Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2022-05-17 City Council - Full Agenda-3175
Op E D o Agenda Edmonds City Council tnl. }nyo REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 MAY 17, 2022, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. PRESENTATIONS 1. Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Booklet (10 min) 2. Proclamation of National Police Week 2022 (5 min) 5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO Edmonds City Council Agenda May 17, 2022 Page 1 THREE MINUTES. SPEAKERS MAY BE LIMITED TO LESS THAN THREE MINUTES BASED ON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKERS. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 19, 2022 2. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2022 3. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 26, 2022 4. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2022 5. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2022 6. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of May 5, 2022 7. Approval of Council Committee Minutes 8. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 9. Approval of claim checks and wire payment. 10. Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Slate Salon & Spa 11. March 2022 Quarterly Financial Report 12. 4th of July, Taste Edmonds, Car Show Event Agreements 13. Approval of Dedication of Bracket's Reserve Plat "Road A" as a public street named 91st PI W 14. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with HBB for Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization - Stage 2 15. Award Construction Contract for the 2022 Utility Replacement Project 16. Approve Local Agency Consultant Agreement with WSP for Construction Management Services on the Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization Stage 2 Project 17. Written Public Comments 18. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with HKA Global, Inc for the Carbon Recovery Project 19. Residential Occupancy Code Amendments 8. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing on the 2023-2028 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (30 min) 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Proposed Ordinance Adding New Chapter, Chapter 5.70 entitled "Unlawful Occupation of Public Property' to the City Code (45 min) 2. Special Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Tltle 4 Licenses (30 min) 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda May 17, 2022 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Booklet Staff Lead: Angie Feser/Cara Brown Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Angie Feser The Board for the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery recently published an educational booklet titled "A Place of Tradition: Edmonds Memorial Cemetery and Columbarium" compiled by Betty Lou Gaeng and edited by Jerry Janacek. Past Board Chair, Jerry Janacek, will formally present the publication to the Council during this meeting. This booklet is a historical documentation of Edmonds, and particularly of the Memorial Cemetery, written and researched by Betty Gaeng. As a past member of the Cemetery Board and an Honorary member, she was the principal researcher, writer and historian of this publication. She has been a historic writer for Edmonds, Lynnwood, south Snohomish County as well as the Edmonds Cemetery. Betty grew up in Edmonds and as a gifted writer and historian, she has significantly contributed to the written and documented history of this region. The Cemetery Board is delighted to present this booklet to the City Council and make it available to members of the Edmonds community free of charge. Packet Pg. 3 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Proclamation of National Police Week 2022 Staff Lead: Mayor Nelson Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation N/A Narrative The purpose of this proclamation is to recognize National Police Week and to honor the service and sacrifice of those law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty while protecting our communities. Attachments: PW_2022 Packet Pg. 4 O City of Edmonds ■ Office of the Mayor National Police Week 2022 To recognize National Police Week 2022 and to honor the service and sacrifice of those law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty while protecting our communities and safeguarding our democracy. WHEREAS, there are more than 800,000 law enforcement officers serving in communities across the United States, including 51 dedicated members of the City of Edmonds Police Department; and WHEREAS, since the first recorded death in 1786, more than 23,000 law enforcement officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice and been killed in the line of duty; and WHEREAS, the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial in Washington, D.C.; and WHEREAS, 619 new names of fallen heroes are being added to the National Law Enforcement Officers a Memorial this spring, including 472 officers killed in 2021 and 147 officers killed in previous N years; and N WHEREAS, the service and sacrifice of all officers killed in the line of duty were honored during the a National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund's 34th Annual Candlelight Vigil, on the evening of May 13, 2022; and WHEREAS, May 15 is designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day, in honor of all fallen officers and their a families; NOW THEREFORE, I, Mike Nelson, Mayor, proclaim May 15 through May 21, 2022 as Police Week and call upon our community to salute our Nation's brave law enforcement officers and remember their peace officer brothers and sisters who have given their last full measure of devotion in the line of duty. Mike Nelson, Mayor May 17, 2022 Packet Pg. 5 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 19, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 04-19-2022 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 6 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL HYBRID SPECIAL MEETING - INTERVIEWS ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER DRAFT MINUTES April 19, 2022 STAFF PRESENT Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council special meeting was called to order at 6:41 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t` Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION 1. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Corbitt Loch, candidate for appointment to Architectural Design Board (ADB) position #7, planner, for appointment to the ADB (responses in italics). Council President Olson welcomed Mr. Loch and invited him to describe his interest in the ADB. I've lived in Edmonds 10 years, have a degree in design, have written design guidelines, served on design review boards, evaluated development proposals relative to design guidelines and a permitting process so I have a pretty well rounded knowledge of design guidelines. The only thing I haven't done is worked as a designer. It is a fascinating field, and the fact that Edmonds will be updating its design standards is important because that is where the success lies, in the clarity of the design guidelines. My experience in writing design guidelines can be useful to the City. Councilmember Paine commented on his marvelous experience, and said she was thrilled to have someone with his breadth of experience both with municipalities and design boards. Councilmember Tibbott expressed his appreciation for his breadth of experience. He asked about his vision for incorporating architectural design in Edmonds when some areas have an older style some newer buildings are being added. What is your vision and experience incorporating new meets old? That is a conundrum for many communities that have a lot of historic character like Edmonds. I spent seven years as the planning director for the City of Snohomish; their downtown is on the National Register of Historic Places and the adjacent area that was somewhat rundown but walkable and close to downtown needed a shot in the arm. The design guidelines I was instrumental in writing helped speak to it. In my Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 19, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 7 opinion, it's inappropriate to create fake history and I would not be one to say let's make buildings look like they are from the 1890s. Buildings should be contemporary and express their current time and place, but still be contextually related and appropriate for their setting. They may have architectural elements that reflect historical context and are compatible with them and not out of place, but not try to create false history. Council President Olson commented she loved that answer. Councilmember Buckshnis said she also loved that answer. She was glad he has the experience and understanding of architectural design related to historic buildings and historic districts. She asked his opinion about designating areas of the City as historic. That depends on the desired outcome. If you want to preserve an area exactly as is, that's fine, but if it is pockets of the community, it might look weird long term, kind of like a monopoly board of architectural styles versus something more contemporary and sensitive throughout. Historic register designation does not mean the buildings cannot be demolished or that they have to be historical replicas, it means buildings should be sensitive to their context and not harm the historic character of the area. Councilmember Chen said he was blown away by the level of experience and knowledge base he brings to City and appreciated him stepping up to volunteer his time and expertise. Edmonds is very unique, there is the downtown area and the rest of Edmonds. He asked his vision to bring Edmonds together as one. I don't know if that's really possible. How could you make Highway 99 like downtown Edmonds and would you like the outcome if you did? One of two would be inaccurate or a misrepresentation of the community. There is nothing wrong with having different neighborhoods; Seattle is known for its distinct and wonderful neighborhoods. There are some uniform elements such as street trees, sidewalks widths, light standards, and other things that tie them together. The design standards for downtown should not be the same as those used on Highway 99. Councilmember Chen commented he did not envision they would be the same but asked if he had a vision for uniformity from a design perspective such as streetlights. Public infrastructure can tie it together while property development is consistent with their own neighborhood standards. There could be some consistent elements in the public areas that say this is Edmonds. Council President Olson advised the confirmations are on consent agenda; approval of the consent agenda means his appointment to the ADB has been approved. 2. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Steve Schmidt, candidate for ADB position #1, architect, (responses in italics). Council President Olson welcomed Mr. Schmidt and asked him to describe his interest in the ADB. I am honored to represent the architecture profession for the ADB. I am a licensed architect for the State of Washington. I graduated with a Master of Architecture from Washington State University. I started my professional career in K-12 education, working on large public institutions such as E.C. Hughes Elementary School in Seattle as well as renovation of a historic high school in Klamath Falls, Oregon. I have also done civic design; one of my latest projects was the Tukwila Justice Center which brought together disparate programs including the Tukwila courts, the Tukwila Police Department, and the emergency operations center. It is located in a very prominent place on Tukwila International Blvd. The project brought a program to a neighborhood in need as well as a neighborhood needing revamp. I have worked on other elementary schools in the region including Parkwood Elementary in Shoreline and many other buildings in the aera. Most recently I worked on 100% affordable housing for the City of Seattle in the Georgetown neighborhood which is currently undergoing permit review as well as student housing Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 19, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 8 7.1.a including my most recent project for the university in Eugene, Oregon. I'm happy to be an architect living in Edmonds and working from home as well as in Pioneer Square where I see all types of urbanism in action. I'm proud to call Edmonds my home and look forward to representing the architectural profession and utilizing my experience in the City. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT EXTEND FOR 5 MINUTES TO 7:05 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember K. Johnson congratulated him for graduating from WSU, her alma mater. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to his comment about working on 100% affordable housing and asked him to share more about that. I am currently on a project in the Georgetown neighborhood, development of 150 units of affordable housing, 100% of those units will be accessible to individuals earning less than 60% of the area average median income. Units will be provided for local artists as well as the local labor force. They are family sized units that they hope to incorporate with Mary's Place and other organizations. Councilmember Tibbott referred to his comment about urban and urban design and asked if he would consider Edmonds an urban environment, a suburban environment, or something different. Edmonds is a mix; the downtown core is one of the original plats of the City and has and urban center/heart whether that is the fountain, the ferry, or the arts district, there are lots of different places. There is not one place that is the heart of Edmond, but the urban core is where you see innovation, excitement, new restaurants, new businesses, new galleries, an area where a lot of effort is being put into it. At the same time, there are neighborhoods that ring the downtown core that could also be considered urban due to the condos and communities build along the waterfront. I live in Westgate, it is almost certainly a suburban neighborhood with few sidewalks and not much infrastructure for multimodal uses. As you move toward Highway 99, a different neighborhood emerges, one that might be called a transitional neighborhood due to the auto uses transitioning into more high density urban or urbane type environments like in Shoreline. Overall, Edmonds is definitely an urban town and will continue to develop in that direction in the future. Council President Olson advised the confirmations are on consent agenda; approval of the consent agenda means his appointment to the ADB has been approved. 3. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 7:03 p.m Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 19, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 9 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 04-21-2022 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 10 7.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE DRAFT MINUTES April 21, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director Kernen Lien, Interim Planning Manager Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 5:15 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present participating remotely, with the exception of Councilmember L. Johnson. 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 11 7.2.a Lynda Fireman, Edmonds, referred to the email she sent to council that asked they use their minds eye to visualize not only what each development will look like as part of a whole in the landscape, but also how it will impact the neighborhood, not just at the front and side but the back of the building as well. Earlier today as she was driving down Main Street, the spectacular view always takes her breath away. The current businesses on either side at 600, 605 and 611 Main do not interfere with the ambiance, allow enjoyment of the wonderful view and don't distract from it which is why residents live here and tourist come to experience it. She suggested imagining how it would look with the proposed apartments dwarfing the heritage cottage at 601 Main and obliterating the 1895 cottage at 605 Main, two of the last vestiges of Edmonds' heritage and a blight on the landscape forever, particularly if the same was built at 600 Main. The square block between 6t1i and 7t1i and Main & Bell is already very high density. Residents pay a premium to live there and spend their money in Edmonds. Some, definitely not all developers, are only in it to maximize their profits and their money goes into the bank; they don't care about the impact on the residents or on the City. Ms. Fireman applauded the council for their wish to add addendums to expand the limits of the designated street front map because businesses are needed, to extend the moratorium for two months for further study, and to eliminate roof top decks, add a provision to follow the slope of the lot against the alley and lot line to help reduce the scale of the building and alleviate the pervasiveness of the 40-foot tall straight flat wall against the alley lot line and allow the adjacent residents to reclaim a little of the lost visual of their surroundings and the light that will be taken away. She urged the council not to allow roof top decks, commenting the development was already oversized and residents want to avoid being kept awake at night. In addition, there is a wind tunnel that comes up the alley and she could envision things flying off the deck. She would like to see the development reduced in height and scale to fit in with the historic downtown and to somehow save the 1895 cottage; it has been a viable business for years and possibly can be moved. She asked the council to give consideration to those who live in the area and are impacted by the development as well as those who will be affected by other imminent development in BD2 spot zones. She recognized there was a lot of divisiveness around these issues, but hoped the council could come together to resolve them. Finis Tupper, Edmonds, commented this has been quite a charade. He recognized councilmembers had a lot of work to do and had to review a lot of materials in the agenda packet. He wondered if any councilmembers looked at Ordinance 3955 regarding BD1 ground floor street front and compared it to the code. He questioned why the code was not updated when Ordinance 3955 was passed. He questioned who was in charge at the City, who was checking this stuff, whether it was the attorney, the council president, the city clerk or the mayor. Anyone with a 6' grade education looking at the building standards for the BD1 zone knows it is business and mixed use commercial. Nowhere has Kernen Lien shown the council where City staff was told that outside the designated street front there could be an entirely multifamily project. The dimensional requirements in the zoning code clearly state 45 feet in the designated street front is required to be commercial. The exception in 7 under BD 1 ground floor street front does not apply to these buildings. There could be doctors or dentists in that 45 feet but there can't be in the BD or the designated street front. Every house in Edmonds has a designated street front. He questioned whether it was defined in the code and said the lie is related to ceiling height and allowed uses in those zones. What the council is trying to do is absolutely illegal and is appealable to the Growth Management Hearings Board. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, said the foundation to tonight's discussion hinges on whether to keep a small portion of the required development in the BD2 downtown mixed commercial zone as commercial. It needs to be accurately stated that multifamily is an allowed use in this zone, even encouraged as mixed use in the comprehensive plan along with a minimum square footage on the ground floor for businesses and jobs that support and compliment the BD 1 commercial only zone. The 2020 validation study of the buildable lands study comparing development predictions with actual development, shows Edmonds exceeded the total predicted housing units by 74%. It also shows the average buildable density in Edmond exceeded predicted Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 12 7.2.a targets by 64%. That is only through 2019, there is time to get this right. She asked how do the community wanted the future vision of Edmonds to play out, whether it was a greater emphasis on Edmonds just expanding housing only which the study clearly shows exceeded county targets, losing small businesses and commercial balance along with local job opportunity growth to coordinate with housing expansion. This will only push residents to travel farther for goods and services including driving further to their jobs because local business options have been removed for even more housing only buildings. A 15-minute City discussion was presented by the development services director as a possible goal for Edmonds, but if the vital supporting role that BD2 service businesses provide to the town is removed, it will become a 45-90 minute town in the end. Dr. Dotsch continued, support service businesses are vital to a thriving community and are excluded from the BD 1 ground floor designated street front zone. Chapter 16.43 which defines all the BD zones contains a footnote that states services, by appointment uses not providing open door retail, dining, entertainment functions as a primary component of the business, are not allowed within BD 1 ground floor street front first 45 feet. Open door businesses, e.g. real estate offices, banks with tellers and no drive throughs, nail and hair salons are allowed. Now the council is prioritizing eliminating the 13132 language that allows for these other uses, these smaller service business to thrive and compliment the mix of jobs and uses in the entire downtown district. Less options for small, appointment -only business will force residents to travel further for these vital services and the staff and clients they bring that frequent the retail shops, restaurants, banks in the core daily. This 13132 use zoning designed on the shoulders of the small downtown district should be preserved for its core economic health, livability and job creation. She requested the council require that businesses and jobs remain in this small BD2 zone. There is already more multifamily square footage allowed in this zone than business, once it is 100% gone, there is no room in the small downtown core to bring it back. She requested the council renew the moratorium and design standards for six months to get this right as there is no rush. 6. COUNCIL BUSINESS EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS IN THE BD2 ZONE City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained two days ago the council adopted an ordinance to extend the moratorium through May 19t'`. However, because that ordinance passed on a 4-3 vote, it will not take effect until sometime next week. The moratorium ends today, so theoretically starting tomorrow building permit applications could be submitted that would vest to the existing design standards, zoning, etc. To the extend the council wants to prevent that from happening, the council has an opportunity at this meeting to adopt the ordinance in the packet that would, with at least five votes, take immediate effect and would also extend the moratorium until June 2" d. That date was chosen after consulting with the development services director to determine the amount of time that likely would be needed for the designated street front issue to be returned to the council for further consideration. Mr. Taraday continued, the idea is the council could extend the moratorium tonight through June 2nd and then take up the designated street front issue on May 17t' and perhaps the following meeting, and still have time to adopt an ordinance before the moratorium expires on June 21. Of course, as long as the moratorium is within the six month authority, the council has some discretion to extend it further, but staff does not believe that it will take longer than June 2' to complete work on the designated street front. If it appears on May 17' that more time is necessary, the council could extend the moratorium again, but his understanding after consulting with the development services director is that it should come to council on May 17d'. Mr. Taraday identified minor amendments that he suggested be made to the packet version. He referenced the draft extension moratorium ordinance on page 4, pointing out the title references both Ordinance 4253 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 13 7.2.a and 4254 (Ordinance 4254 was adopted on Tuesday). As Section 1 does not reference Ordinance 4254, he suggested a minor edit to Section 1 that would read, "...extended by Ordinances 4253 and 4254 ..." The second edit would add a whereas clause before the last whereas clause that reads, "Whereas Ordinance 4254 extended the moratorium through May 19`h, 2022 but did not pass with sufficient margin to take immediate effect; and. He apologized for the edits, but said with the moratorium expiring, they are necessary. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED BY ORDINANCES 4253 AND 4254. Council President Olson said she was excited for the opportunity to pass this ordinance with a super majority and have it take effective immediately so there will be better design standards in place. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ATTORNEY, ADDING ORDINANCE 4254 IN SECTION 1 AND THE ADDITIONAL WHEREAS CLAUSE. Councilmember Buckshnis asked Mr. Taraday to send councilmembers the language he read for the additional whereas. Mr. Taraday shared his screen so councilmembers were able to read it and repeated the amendments, revise Section 1 to read, "...extended by Ordinances 4253 and 4254 ..." and add a whereas clause before the last whereas clause that reads, "Whereas Ordinance 4254 extended the moratorium through May 19`h, 2022 but did not pass with sufficient margin to take immediate effect; and. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-0), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, AND PAINE AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has either an amendment or a clarification. She referred to the 15t' whereas clause (WHEREAS, the history suggests that what was seen in 2011 as the logical limits of the downtown commercial core may no longer fit the circumstances of 2022 due to the fact that certain blocks are showing vibrant commercial activity right up to the edges of the designed street front map; and) and questioned why 2011 was used when the original Ordinance 3628 regarding BD zones was adopted in 2007. Mr. Taraday said it was most recently amended in 2011. Interim Planning Manager Kernen Lien said 2011 is the ordinance that adopted the current extent of the designated street front. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding it was updating Ordinance 3628. Mr. Lien agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis said in reading this, it is kind of judgmental and she preferred using logical limits, fit the circumstances, etc. She questioned if that whereas clause was even needed. Mr. Taraday pointed out a typo in that whereas clause; it should be "designated," instead of "designed." In his opinion the whereas clause is helpful because it explains why the extension of the moratorium to June 2nd is necessary; it is necessary because the council wants to reevaluate the designated street front map. That is essentially the primary reason for the proposed extension. He felt it was a helpful whereas clause, but recognized the council was free to amend. Councilmember Buckshnis said now that Mr. Taraday had explained it, she was fine with it. She suggested a whereas clause saying the definition of the BD2 is mixed residential. She has yet to see where council has deliberated on the two options which were given to the council at the time of the BD4 zones and wanted to have language that states, "Whereas BD2 always been recognized by council as mixed residential." Mr. Taraday answered the whereas clauses explain in essence the reasons for what the council is doing today, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 14 7.2.a but do not prevent the council from taking action in future. He realized that some people may still disagree with the analysis provided regarding the BD zone. That whereas clause does not prevent the council from stating in the future that there is not going to be residential only structures anywhere in the BD2 zone. There are several ways to accomplish that such as drastically increasing the designated street front map, a map amendment, text amendment, etc. That whereas clause does not prevent the council in the future from doing what the council wants to do with residential structures. Councilmember Buckshnis said it was Ordinance 3918 that describes the subdistricts and BD2 is downtown mixed commercial. She would like to have a whereas in Ordinance in 3918 stating the BD2 zone is defined as downtown mixed commercial. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS/COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, TO ADD A WHEREAS CLAUSE THAT ORDINANCE 3918 DEFINES BD2 AS DOWNTOWN MIXED COMMERCIAL. Councilmember Buckshnis commented some councilmembers lived through this; she recalled former Councilmember Petso saying land use is permanent, you better be very careful with what you do. She has read a lot of materials, she appreciated the work done by staff and Mr. Taraday, but in her opinion Ordinance 3918 was left out of the agenda memo and she felt it was a very important ordinance. The new moratorium addresses street fronts and defines building types. Ordinance 39818 defines BD2 as downtown mixed commercial. She had not seen any materials related to transition zones, etc. This further acknowledges that there are a number of important ordinance related to the BD topic. Councilmember Paine said the whereas that refers to 2011 is the reason for extending the moratorium from May 19' to June 2" d. She did not believe this new whereas clause adds additional clarity or a compelling story which is the reason for having clear whereas clauses. Council President Olson said the comment by Councilmember Paine was a fair point. She was the one that noticed Ordinance 4254 was not referenced in the whereas clause and even though it didn't change anything, it did document the history and she felt the same about adding language regarding Ordinance 3918. It does not have an impact because the council can choose what they think is appropriate for the BD2 zone, but it documents the history and therefor it adds value. Councilmember Chen valued the history and the additional understanding via adding Ordinance 3918 to the proposed ordinance. Mr. Taraday commented it is true that Ordinance 3918 was one of the ordinance that amended the BD zoning code, but the language about downtown mixed commercial has been in code since 2008; it was not amended by Ordinance 3918. It was not staff s goal in drafting the memo regarding the history to identify every ordinance that has amended any aspect of the BD zone. Staff s focus was on the ordinances they felt had some relevance to the designated street front and the BD2 uses which is why Ordinance 3918 is not referenced. He did not think there was any harm in referencing it, but it does not add much to explain why the council was doing this. Ordinance 3918 was primary about building height and things like that, not about uses or the designated street front. The red lines in the ordinance show where it was amended. Councilmember Buckshnis read from Ordinance 3918, Whereas the following work sessions with the members of the ADB and Planning Board took place July 9, 2013, February 13 and February 27, 2013. She recalled it very clearly and she was sure Councilmember K. Johnson did as well and likely Councilmember Tibbott. It defines the subdistricts, whereas the memo goes into the reasoning behind the street fronts; in her opinion reference to Ordinance 3918 added a valuable piece of history. Ordinance 3918 was a pivotal year when the council was looking at the BD zones; some may not feel it adds value but she thought it did. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 15 UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER PAINE VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE Senior Planner Mike Clugston offered to review the language in the packet. Councilmember K. Johnson said the first step is to un-table this item so the council can discuss it. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON TO UN -TABLE THIS DISCUSSION ITEM FOR INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY ONLY BUILDING IN THE BD2 ZONE. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said he included a recommendation in the agenda that the council not un-table the motion as it will be a much easier process to move the ordinance in packet. Otherwise a number of amendments would need to be made to the ordinance that the council tabled. If the council prefers to start where they left off on Tuesday, that is certain the council's prerogative. Councilmember K. Johnson asked for further clarification, advising she did not see the recommendation to not un-table the item and she did not understand how the council could discuss it without un-tabling it. Mr. Taraday relayed the recommendation to move the ordinance in the packet. Tuesday's motion was to move the ordinance in that packet. They are not the same ordinances and the council's deliberation would be much more straightforward if the council began by moving the ordinance in the packet. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding that by not removing the item from the table, it would be tabled indefinitely. Mr. Taraday agreed, explaining there is no obligation to ever remove something from the table. His intent was to provide the most streamlined process; the ordinance in tonight's packet will be the best starting point for council's deliberation and starting anywhere else will make deliberations more complex. He recommended leaving Tuesday's ordinance on the table and starting deliberations with the ordinance in tonight's packet. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND-ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4253. Councilmember Tibbott said staff did a good job of capturing the essence of Tuesday's conversation and he agreed with the language used to describe the design standards. He will support ordinance. Councilmember Paine said she will support this ordinance and hoped it would be sufficient for as long as it was needed. She hoped the feasibility study regarding the needs of either commercial businesses or residential in this part of town would be completed prior to the moratorium's expiration on June 2nd. She will support the interim ordinance, expressing her preference to have moratorium lifted well before June 2nd Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 16 Councilmember Chen asked for clarification on design standard D, some roof modulation is required with preference for step-down that follows the slope when slope exists. He asked if that affected the building height. Mr. Clugston answered this was offered as an amendment on Tuesday. It does not affect the maximum height in the zone which is still 30 feet for the BD2 zone, but requires some roof modulation and step-down is one of the option. Councilmember Chen asked if the roof modulation referred to the same building or separate buildings. Mr. Clugston answered it would refer to two separate buildings, As the slope steps down, there would be roof modulation between the buildings and the intent is that each building would have some roof modulation. That could be achieved via a step-down or other ways. Councilmember Chen summarized the intent is for the view from the higher building to not be blocked by the building lower on the slope. Mr. Clugston said he did not know if that was the intent of adding this standard. If there is a slope, the buildings would step down the slope and there would be opportunity to modulate the roof. Councilmember Chen expressed support for the ordinance. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Exhibit A, Chapter 22.43.080, was adopted as part of this ordinance. Mr. Taraday answered yes. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, ADD TO THE END OF SECTION A, INTENT, "AND COMPLY TO HUMAN SCALE BY VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL MODULATION." Councilmember Buckshnis said a builder with over 20 years' experience indicated using "compatible within the downtown area" could result in a big block building and suggested adding human scale. The intent of the amendment is to take vertical and horizontal issues into account. She recall Councilmember Tibbott asking about that relative to the post office building. Councilmember Paine asked if an addition to the intent helped describe what was required or was that accomplished via the specifics regarding materials, private amenity space, street site amenities, roof modulation, landscaping, etc. Human scale is subjective depending on context. Adding human scale is a broader discussion that should be reviewed by the planning board and ADB to ensure they are comfortable with adopting that because they would need to review against it. Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin answered this section will be a subsection of the broader design standards. The intent and purpose of those design standards already articulate human scale, keeping with the historic nature of downtown, repeating historic patterns, vertical and horizontal modulation, etc. so it would be redundant. Having an intention statement identifies the outcome once all the design standards are rolled up. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND SO THE TITLE OF THE ORDINANCE READS, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. , AND —LIFTING THE AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO AMEND ITEM 2 RELATED TO BALCONIES, TO ADD AT THE END OF THE FIRST SENTENCE, "DECKS ENCROACHING INTO SETBACKS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO THE SECOND FLOOR ONLY." Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 17 7.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis commented it is important to understand that decks encroach on the vibrancy of the City because it is part of the common space. Therefore, she wanted to ensure that decks that encroach into the setback were limited to the second floor and up. Councilmember Paine assumed all decks would on the second or third floor and she did not understand what this amendment would change. Most likely decks would encroach, but not beyond 5 feet. Councilmember Buckshnis provided an example, pointing out on the post office building part of it is commercial and she considered the patios to be decks. Mr. Clugston explained the intent of the standard was balconies are on the second and third floors of buildings and can project out or be built into the building; decks and patios are at the ground level which is why two different standard distances were proposed. On the ground level, they can project into the 15 foot setback by 10 feet and balconies on the second and third floors can project a maximum of 5 feet. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 6:11 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 18 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 26, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 04-26-2022 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 19 7.3.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - INTERVIEWS DRAFT MINUTES April 26, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember (arrived at 6:12 p.m.) 1. CALL TO ORDER STAFF PRESENT Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION 1. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Mary Beth Tragus-Campbell, a candidate for appointment to the Planning Board alternate (responses in italics). Council President Olson welcomed Ms. Tragus-Campbell, and invited her to describe her interest in serving on the Planning Board. I live and work in Edmonds. I am a Texas transplant and moved to the Pacific Northwest a couple years ago. I have worked in a variety of industries, but my main focus has been parks. I spent over 10 years working for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. While with the parks, I served as a wildland firefighters working in the urban wildland interface, planned and implemented resource management programs, partnered with city governments for integration into their programs and master plans, developed trails, taught outdoor skills programs and did a lot of design work and research. One of my largest projects was in the Dallas area; I was a site ranger responsible for the redevelopment of a large Texas state park, 7,000 acres, 350 camp sites, and over $3 million in annual revenue that had catastrophic flooding so the project included redoing roads, utilities, playgrounds, swim beaches, meeting hall, and picnic areas. I worked with a broad scope of people that a Planning Board has the opportunity to interact with including architects, park planners, DOT teams and most important to me, the community, to ensure we had their buy -in and a clear understanding of how the community wanted the rebuild to occur. Where I excel and one of the things that drew me to the Planning Board is seeing where small changes can make a large impact, sometimes for better, sometimes for worse. I'm excited to be involved in the research and recommendations for code changes. My experience with the parks will help ensure that we balance our economic and ecological needs. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 26, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 20 7.3.a Council President Olson asked about her housing background, recalling it sounded like she grew up in family with a builder or developer. Construction and housing has been in my family's history since the 1950s. The family owned a lumber mill and yard in Pennsylvania and my dad built houses for living. I had the opportunity to assist him and help build the house my parents currently live in as well as doing home inspections. While construction and working with codes and development have never been in my job title, is something I gravitate toward. I am currently an executive assistant for a chemical distributor but was the lead for redeveloping a building in Westgate for their new company headquarters and am in the process of doing design work for a warehouse in the Everett area. Councilmember Buckshnis commented on her wonderful background, noting she was in the middle of WRIA 8 grant funding and she would be a perfect candidate to work for any parks and recreation system. With regard to ecology and her desire to learn more, she asked her opinion about issues regarding streams and parks in Edmonds. One of the things I see that is a concern for me is invasive species proliferation such as excessive amounts of invasive hollies and sacred bamboo which is lovely ornamental but has high water consumption. Trying to ensure projects when possible use native species adapted to the environment, species with deeper root systems to avoid erosion issues, is important. I was listening to a Planning Board meeting where the parks director was talking about getting rid of concrete in areas to allow water sources to be replenished through natural processes. A lot of times it doesn't take money to do things in an ecologically sound way, it just takes a little extra time and thought. Because I have had the chance do those redevelopments, I've learned each of us works from our own space. Making sure that we have a clear understanding of the need and with any change, why are we doing it, what is the desire for it and how to put the best solutions in place requires always considering those ecological aspects. Councilmember Buckshnis offered to connect her with the Lake Ballinger Forum, commenting there were a lot of problems with invasives in the lake. Councilmember Tibbott asked, with her parks background, what she saw as the biggest opportunity for parks in Edmonds, either green space, recreation, or community activities, what she saw as the low hanging fruit in the parks system. The low hanging fruit, one should always start with trying to more effectively utilize the resources we have. I did not realize until six months after we bought our house that there is marsh trail/boardwalk in excellent condition that has interpretive signs or that there are different neighborhood parks. I live fairly close to the Interurban Trail and would like to see directional signage on Highway 99 showing how to connect to the Interurban Trail system. There are green spaces behind some schools that can be accessed but only if you know where they are. That was a challenge we had with the park system in Texas. I worked at three different sites over my career at TPWT, all within about 25-30 miles of urban areas, either Houston or Dallas. Park staff assumed everyone knew about the resources and programs that can be used with no cost via scholarships, but when we went out in the community to learn why different groups weren't visiting the parks, we found out those assumptions were incorrect. It is important to increase the lands that are held publicly because once they are developed, you can never get them back in that same condition. It is very important to make sure we have those programs, but in terms of low handing fruit, starting with what you have and making sure it can be fully utilized. That is typically fairly inexpensive and can help reignite people's interest andpassion regarding what's in their backyard. Councilmember Paine asked about her work style when she has worked on boards before and working with a group of like-minded citizens. When I first join any working group, I like to ask questions to learn about the projects, what is most important to people and see what's going on and what's already in progress. If there is something in its final stages, I do not need to make changes so that I have my own stamp on it. I want to provide support when I'm coming in at the back end and then as new things rotate through, I will have gained a greater understanding of how the group likes to work and where my function can be most effective. I have a tendency to be in the public forum, I dig into things I work on, I get very excited and passionate about parks and green spaces so I have a tendency to be one of the people Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 26, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 21 who is tasked with going to public meetings and being the representative and explaining what is going on and then trying to build consensus. Not everyone is going to agree with my opinions or the goals of the committee or board, but having clear communication and brining in the sources and experts who have the information, it is always possible to at least understand one another. Councilmember Paine pointed out the Planning Board will be making a presentation to the council tonight. Councilmember Chen thanked her for applying and volunteering her expertise with the City. He asked her thoughts about Highway 99, especially the project on the center median and the Highway 99 project in general. The Highway 99 project is definitely in my backyard. I'm delighted to see we're trying to break up the extra wide concrete there. It will be a good opportunity to provide some greenery and have that portion of Highway 99 more closely mirror my impressions of the western and northern sections of Edmonds with green spaces and places where it feels more forested versus a strip mall type of suburb. It will help to demonstrate the City's delineation andpersonality. I am a little concerned with change in the flow of traffic by not allowing as much movement across the median. It will improve pedestrian safety, but it will take some adjustment once construction starts. Long term, it will result in a reduction of litter; generally ifpeople see a clean green space, there is less inclination to throw things out window and there is more pride in an area. It will get mixed reactions, but I'm delighted to see it moving forward. Councilmember K. Johnson congratulated her on her interest in the Planning Board and looked forward to meeting her in person. She noted the Planning Board is also the City's Park Board. Councilmember L. Johnson welcomed her and thanked her for applying. Council President Olson advised the confirmations are on consent agenda; once that is approved, her appointment to the alternate position on the Planning Board is approved. 2. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Richard Marin for appointment to Cemetery Board Position #4 (responses in italics). Council President Olson welcomed Mr. Marin, and invited him to describe his interest in serving on the Cemetery Board. I've been involved with the Donor Closet for the last 14 years and that has kept me pretty busy. I have missed being involved with the City. I have enjoyed being involved with several projects at the cemetery and the City's parks over the years and would love to get back into the City again. Councilmember K. Johnson commented the last time they had seen each other was at the Memorial Day Cemetery event pre COVID. She recalled having the pleasure of working with him on the Transportation Commission, and relayed her belief that he will love the Cemetery Board. The Cemetery Board works pretty autonomously, does not have any council representation, so the council can rely on him to bring messages to the council. Councilmember L. Johnson asked what encouraged him to apply for this position. I was wishing for something for a long time and this looks like an easy one to get back into the City. Now that my wife is planted in the cemetery and my name is on a headstone, I believe it will be a nice place to start. I have also thoroughly enjoyed my involvement in the Memorial Day ceremony as veteran. Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for his past service and applauded his interest in helping the City again. Council President Olson advised the confirmations are on consent agenda; once that is approved, his appointment to the Cemetery Board is approved. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 26, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 22 3. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION, RCW 42.30.110(t)(I) At 6:25 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.40.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 30 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. Elected officials present at the executive session were Mayor Nelson, and Councilmembers K. Johnson, Tibbott, Buckshnis, Paine, Olson, L. Johnson, and Chen. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday. At 6:55 p.m. Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended for 10 minutes. At 7:05 p.m. Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended for 10 minutes. The executive session concluded at 7:15 p.m. Mayor Nelson reconvened the special City Council meeting at 7:15 p.m. 4. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 26, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 23 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 05-03-2022 Draft Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 24 7.4.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DRAFT MINUTES May 3, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Susan Paine, Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Brook Roberts, Student Representative 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Michelle Bennett, Acting Police Chief Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Dir. Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Rob English, Interim Public Works Director Kernen Lien, Interim Planning Manager Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Patricia Taraday, City Attorney's Office Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerri Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Chen read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present or participating virtually. 4. PRESENTATIONS 1. BUILDABLE LANDS REPORT AND INITIAL 2044 GROWTH TARGETS Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin welcomed Stephen Toy, Principal Demographer, Snohomish County Planning and Development Services. Will follow up with Edmonds specific information. Mr. Toy reviewed: • What preceded tonight's discussion? Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 25 7.4.a \sue Growing Together •�' to dw t 1� What is the Buildable Lands Report (BLR)? o GMA requirement for 7 counties and the cities within them o Requires periodic evaluation of: ■ Urban densities achieved ■ Adequacy of remaining urban capacity for accommodating growth (to 2035), based on observed densities Inconsistencies between actual and planned development patterns and targets If needed, reasonable measures, other than expanding UGAs, to remedy inconsistencies gram (2018) BLR History o Countywide Planning Policies address city/county coordination on BLR through Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT) process ■ SCT Procedures Report (2000) ■ SCT Reasonable Measures Program (2003) o Snohomish County has completed 3 previous BLRs: 2002, 2007 & 2012 o Centralized data collection and analysis approach, focused on use of County GIS resources and PDS staff o Relies on extensive city -county staff meetings for map/data review o SCT recommendation o County Council adoption of final report How is the BLR used? o Cities/county to use the BLR information for: ■ Current plan/zoning evaluation ■ 2044 growth targets development through SCT ■ Base data for land use alternatives analysis for next GMA local plan updates due in 2024 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 26 7.4.a • Snohomish County BLR — Conceptual Model density actually happensin each zone? 1. What land in the UGAs 3. What is the could be land capacity? developed? 5. What are the growth targets? 4. How much 6. Is there is likely to be enough land available by 203 5? capacity? • 2021 BLR Mapping for City of Edmonds and MUGA 1. Land Status Map 2. Zone /Future Land Use Map 3. Critical Areas, Buffers and Easements Map 4. Additional Housing Unit Capacity Map 5. Additional Employment Capacity Map • 2021 BLR Density Analysis for City of Edmonds Zones o Housing Units per Buildable Acre by Zone Assumed ResidmtW nenzA:.7 Fs -2CHD" 2.0:5 RS -liOW 3.17 RS -1 DOM 3.41 RS -a Coe 4.51 RS -6CO& 5.?4 R-S-A" 5.50 R311-3404 10.70 Rhi-NOO 16.55 RM-1504 21.41 RM-Ei�", 3C-Ell" 48.35 SC T%L--s PmjecFs} 28_£6 SC UmriH Fnoj-L-evS) NIA ED-1 5.00 SD-2 46.83 ED-3 28.67 ED-4 fio_0o S;i}--A 30.00 Ems- NIA C4—' (Ne-F-F Prai cecst 42.00 C-G (Infill Froj rc ts) NIA CIA NIA 1% IP-1 15.00 NIP-2 30.00 hit- (hiedical Uze) NIA �474ii- 30.7U Uffice•R�sideatial 21.20 • Visualizing Achieved Densities by Zone Buildable densities for residential or mixed -use development projects observed in City of Edmonds, 2011 through early 2021 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 27 7.4.a Automatic Zoom O $ ej A 3. LF 39. 2% -- ��� JIM ior ...NEON& p ed�ch ea,— peemandsrx�n ._._ � edrrords M•ndirg . f�shnt Mat ... ._._: �_ainat rcce eY.,.s s.�,pn urcr,.etrr a rnmmiw uss a..,. a�b ,....�,c ew, r,r, �s ® MuA��-�mro - MInN 515e ronxewaamrye�n iRr�ms.ix cs4 [e�ia. qua mmw:m mee�su�.m�mmunq'. . • Population Capacity o The City of Edmonds has adequate capacity to accommodate its 2035 population growth target o Most of the City's additional population capacity is for multifamily development on redevelopable properties Comparison of 2035 UGA Population Targets with Total Population Capacity Estimates Edmonds -City and Unincorporated MUGA IANestirnates, Targets and capacitycomparisons below are based on December 13, 2012 city boundaries] 2019 CPP2035 2019-2035 2035 Total Additional Estimated Population Numeric Population 2019-2035 Area Po on Targets Cha a Capacity Po CapacityEdmonds Area 46,153 49,574 3,412 56,508 10,345Edmonds [76.113 City 42,170 45,550 3,380 51,663 9,493 Unincorporated MUGA 3,993 4,024 32 4,845 852 820 Additional Population Capacity of 9,493 {2019-20351, by Land Status, City of Edmonds - 202 1BLR �•uNa Additional population Capacity of 9,493 12019-2935). by Housing Type, City of Edmonds - 2021 BLR sruetxned anvor wn_---- cx MWI. �rni4-- -- en Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 28 C N d c 0 c� 0 0 L 0. rL Q N r 7 C C r N d w 6_ L 0 N N O N M O LC1 O �.i C d E t LJ 2 a+ a 7.4.a • Employment Capacity o The City of Edmonds has adequate capacity to accommodate its 2035 employment growth target o Most of the City's additional population capacity is for commercial development on redevelopable properties Comparison of 2035 Employment Targets with Total Employment Capacity Edmonds - City and Unincorporated MUGA [A4es6rnMs,tar,;PN and capacity comparisons below are based on December 13, 2012 city Iboundaries] EdrTlonds Area Edmonds City LRwnwrporated MUGA I 2U19 CPP2035 2419-2035 1 2435Tdal Estimated Emplayrrlert Murrill Err5:� 17011rt : nlnlry nt Tamets Clanow r aaity 14421 I 14.148 {273y 17.041 14.174 13,948 (Z28) 18.722 247 200 {47)319 Additioltsl Employment Capadty of 2,549 i2019.2035}, by Land Status, Gty of Edmonds - 2021 SLR Additional Employment Capacity of 2,548 {2019-2035), by Employment Type, City of Edmonds - 202113LR rwr ref. • Additional Capacity by Zone, City of Edmonds Population Employment Additional Popaliall Zone GaPacily Zone BC Total Community Business 158 1,7% BC Total Community Business BLEW Total Community Business - Edmonds Way 60 0,6% BC-EW Total Community Business - Edmonds Way BDI Total Downtown Retail Core 13132 Total Downtown Mixed Commercial 10 D,151` 473 5 C% BDl Total Downtown Retail Core BD3 Total Downtown Convenience Commercial 58 1,65E BD2 Total Downtown Mixed Commercial 13134 Total Downtown Mixed Residential 9 D,1% BD3 Total Downtown Convenience Commercial BD5 Total Downtown Arts Corridor 26 1,35E BD5 Total Downtown Arts Corridor BP Total Planned Business 9 0,1% BN Total Neighborhood Business CGTotal Genera l Commercial 52,55 55.4% BP Total Planned Business MP2 Total Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use 373 3.9% CG Total General Commercial RM-1.5 Total Muni Family 1,500 d lots 271 2.9% MP2 Total Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use RM-2.4 Total Mull Family 2,400 sit lots 238 2,5% MU Total Medical Use RM-3 Total Muri Family 3,000 sf lots 3 DD% RS-10 Total Single Family Res. 10=0 sf lots 68 07% OR Total Office Residential RS-12Toto1 Single Family Res. 12,101 sf lots 224 24% WMV Total Westgate Mixed Ose R3-20 Total Single Family Res. 20,000 sf lots 88 0,9% Grand Total R3-6 Total Single Family Res. 6,000 sf lots 91 1 0% RS-B Total Single Fam ly Res. 8,000 st lots 51D 5,4% RS-MP Total Single Family Res. Master Plan 12JM sf lots 49 Db% WMU Total Westgate Mixed Use 1513 15.9% Grand Total 9496 100,0% • 2044 Initial Growth Targets GMA: RCW 36.70A.I10 Comprehensive plans — Urban growth areas. At each major UGA review (every 8 years under GMA): Addidorel Enl Capac 2019-2035 I Sfrptfg vs 2.820 2.893 2,548 2,774 72 119 Additional Employmenf Capacity 207 8.1% 7 0.3% 177 6.9% 162 6.4% 93 3.6% 71 2.8% 163 6.4% 78 3.1% 1500 58.8% 20 0.8% 50 2.0% 0 0.0% 21 0.3% 2549 100.0% Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 29 7.4.a (2) Based upon the growth management population projection made for the county by the office of financial management, the county and each city within the county shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county or city for the succeeding twenty-year period... • Vision 2050 Regional Plan o VISION 2050's multicounty planning policies, actions, and regional growth strategy (RGS) guide how and where the 4-county central Puget Sound region grows through 2050 o The plan informs updates to the Regional Transportation Plan and Regional Economic Strategy ❑ VISION 2050 sets the stage for updates to countywide planning policies and local comprehensive plans done by cities and counties • Vision 2050 Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Regional Population and Job Growth 2017-2050: Region 1,756,000 1,158,000 Data Source, PSRC Regional Forecast Countywide Population and Job Growth 2017-2050: King County 50% 597 Osap County 5% 5% Pierce County 21% 17% Snohomish 24% 197. County Data Sauoe: County growth shares from VISION 2050 Regional Growth Strategy Note: Central Puget Sound counties have agreed to use this forecast for initial growth targetsetting for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Updates • RGS and OFM Countywide Population Comparison Snohomish County Population 4ao,000 — iiY]ZYL'] 7,zoo,aao aao,aao 1,090,757 827,957 922,aae 8w,00a - 600,000 1490 2020Avg Annual 202o-2044Avg A Pop Chaage [Rctuaq: Pop Change lRGSj: 12,078 12,.. 40o,000,9— .�3' �EA'�'y�' yd,'ey8+'�h�h®�h@''486h�mtil�ti'r ti'r'ti� h07�h���h0�'�hOb'YOre'YO1mhO.��ti�M1h�S' h6�'6�6�'�M1tl''YG� h`, hS �6' -OFM Supp. Proletlion - Low —OFM Supp. Projection- Merlum —OFM Supp. Proleeion-High —VISION 2050 RGS Act,al Population RGS: Regional Geographies in Snohomish County Total County population of i,i36,3o9 by 2044 based on PSRCVISION 2o5o Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Increase of 3o8,352 population from 2020 to 2044 Projected annual average population increase is similar to past annual average Falls within low -high range of OFM 2o17 GMA supplemental projections New OFM population projections are anticipated in late 2022 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 30 7.4.a r aap�aawceogrepme. RGS distributes 2017-2050 population O0P9 and employment growth to "regional geographies" (different groups of i pry omw^°W. =o—T^.^, jurisdictions) in the region °sWn.re°a Metro City 20.0% 39.5% Core Crites 12.0% 17.5% IM•^�' •"•^� HCT 50.0% 30.0,�6 EvereCommunities / s�onomisn c"unry Cities &Towns 9.5% 6.0% Urban 4.0% 3.0% Unincorporated Rural 45% 2.0% Total Snohomish 100.0% 100.0% a County VISION zo5o RGS —Clear Emphasis on Focusing Growth NearTransit and in Centers: • 82% of population and 37% of employment growth countywide targeted to Metro, Care, HCT Communities • RGS Population Growth to 2044 Compared with BLR Capacity to 2035 UGA Population Growth to 2044 compared with Current Comp Plan Capacity to 2035 (based on 2021 Buildable Lands Report) 200,0oo 173,455 150,000 120,252 1no,00n - 69,382 50,000 - 39,251 41,629 39,160 42,033 30,616 17,202 3,873 8,fi73 8,529 [11,013] (53,203) {1m,Doo) - Metra City Core Cities HCT Communities Cities & Towns Urban Uninc ■ 2017-04 Pap Chng ■ 2017-2035 Addtnl Pop Cap ■ Addtnl Pop Cap Surplus vs Shortfall to 2044 Notes: 2044 population is derived from 2ol7-2o5o straight line interpolation. • Information shown is for current city boundaries as of Aug-26-2021. • Due to relatively large annexations of portions of the unincorporated UGA into Cities &Towns since 2017, the RGS growth shares were adjusted to il%forCities & Towns (up from 9.540) and 2.5%for Urban Unincorporated (down from 4%). • RGS Employment Growth to 2044 Compared with BLR Capacity to 2035 UGA Employment Growth to 2044 compared with Current Comp Plan Capacity to 2035 (based on 2021 Buildable Lands Report) 71.OB5 Om 5a 9ra 17.781 A6,3eo Daa 31,093 oao n,ma u.ssa eau s� 3,a1b 11 Bb7] Ito�s1 1a7o71 >W1 t7>,.rm xnt Metm CtEs rnrc CX'rs XCr rnmmuntEs CREs&Towns Ilaan aninc ■2017-44 Emp Chng 02017-2G35 Addtnl Emp Cap ■ Addto I Em p Cap Surplus v 51hortfall to 2044 Notes: • z 44 employment isderived from 2017-zo50 straight line interpolation_ • Information shown is for current city boundaries as of Aug-26-2o21. • Employment estimates and forecasts exclude resource and censtruction jobs. • Due to a recommended reassignment of employment growth from theTown of Darrington to other Cities&Towns and to the Paine Field MIC within the U rban Unincorporated regional geography, the RGS employment growth share for Cities & Towns dropped to 7.7% from 8.oM, while the Urban U nincorporated share rose to 3.3%from 3.0% Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 31 7.4.a Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) for Snohomish County o Process for allocating 20 years of projected growth in Snohomish County for city and county GMA planning follows CPP GF-5: ■ Uses SCT process ■ Uses the most recent OFM county population projections and the PSRC's Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) as the starting point ■ Emphasizes growth in and near centers and high -capacity transit, addresses jobs/housing balance, manages and reduces the rate of rural growth over time, and supports infTll within the urban growth area ■ Must consider each community's vision & regional role in the RGS ■ Shall ensure flexibility for jurisdictions in implementing the RGS, considering levels of infrastructure investment and market conditions o CPP GF-5: ■ Calls for two separate steps for establishing 20-year growth targets: - Initial Growth Targets (developed by SCT in 2021) • To be used for at least one of the plan alternatives evaluated by jurisdictions for their GMA plan update - Reconciled Growth Targets (to be developed by SCT in 2024-2025) Follows GMA plan updates by jurisdictions in Snohomish County SCT Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) o PAC developed a methodology for translating the population and employment projections in VISION 2050 by regional geography to individual jurisdictions o Methodology takes into account the capacity results to 2035 from the 2021 BLR o In addition, a series of data factors were used to distribute growth beyond 2035 to individual jurisdictions, that take into account: ■ Existing population and employment distribution ■ Change over the past decade ■ Volume of pending development ■ Number of light rail and HCT stations ■ Mic locations, and ■ Transportation accessibility to job centers (for population) High -Capacity Transit Communities - Population Area Edmonds Area Edmonds City Unincorporated MUGA 2020 2044 Census Population Population Targets 46,860 60,881 42,853 55,966 4,007 4,915 2020-2044 Population Growth Pct of Total Amount County Growth 14,021 4.5% 13,113 4.3% 908 0.3% HCr Conmules PopuLation luslog Wy boundaries as of Aug-26-20211 60o1m 2021L204d Population Change M35 Pop CaPeity Surplus( shortfall p2ata' 0CT Lammunioes 153,241 l53,203; Amngcan aty ] ,731 (t, 1: dC4md Edr ds City 13,113 {3,920; Marysville City 29,108 {8,738; Mill Creek City 3,887 {2,747: MoJW Mountlake Terrace City 13,424 (3,406: Mukilteo City 3,078 {2,074; amPat ot Bhell MUGA 10,927 {BA57: Edmonds MUGA Everett MUGA 17,230 w)pm LY.—ti MUGA 19,793 MITI Greek MUGA 13,377 {6,430; Mutilteo MUGA 8,178 {3,581: to Wa ._dr 5154n {2,801' .A .+, .jl .gyp �y $ .(1 .$ .@ .p ,a 01161111511 'l 11511 "G '1�� 1;1l l4pl , 4piY �R' "P'le —Pop Total Pop Capacity to 2035(2022 B LBQ I I `- Negative amounts i dlidate addai.mal capacity nestled High -Capacity Transit Communities - Employment Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 32 7.4.a Area 2D19 Employment Estimates Edmonds Area 14,421 Edmonds City 14,174 Unincorporated MUGA 247 NCy Communities Employment (using city boi mfari s as of Aug-16-2021) ]IOA00 l�� t ia0aea aaeo 100,k00 eoaoa anAaa IO,k00 mAoa —Emp —Total Emp Capacity to 2035 (2021 BLR) 2D44 Employment Targets 17,585 117,232 353 2D19-2D44 Employment Growth Pct of Total Amount County Growth 3,164 1 .8% 3,058 1 .8% 106 0.1% Kim-ul 21135 Emp Capa[Ity Employment 5urplusj 5hortall 13ETfarnrm.M— 5L3at 16,N j Adfngton City 14,423 (L247] Edmonds City 3,M 1510] —Y-11e cny t7,6t6 (1,492) Mill Creek City 736 1355] Mountlake Terrace Cily 2,717 1408] Mukllleoviv 2,356 (291) Bothell MUGA 542 11W) Edmonds MUGA 1% 04) EVUM MUGA L905 (666) Lynnwood MUGA 21942 1400] Mill Creek MUGA 115% (571) Mukilleo MUGA 2,698 (349] Negaflw amounts inditateadditional ua cityneeded to aUV Cap 0re5U1[ Additional Information 0 2044 housing targets to be adopted into CPPs following development of SCT HO-5 Housing Characteristics and Needs Report in 2022 0 2021 Buildable Lands Report: https://snohomishcountywa.gov/1352/Buildable-Lands 0 2044 Initial Growth Targets (Appendix B of the CPPs, pages 68-71): https://snohomishcountywa.gov/5782/Countywide-Planning-Policies Councilmember Paine relayed her understanding that if there were any inconsistencies, consideration has to be given to reasonable measures related to reaching the goal. Mr. Toy answered reasonable measures take effect if there are any inconsistencies with the BLR requirements in terms of accommodating 2035 growth. The City had adequate capacity to reach the 2035 growth target for population and employment. The 2044 Growth Targets assign more growth than the BLR capacity shows the City can handle. The steps under reasonable measures strategies will apply in the comprehensive plan update to evaluate which reasonable measures make sense to implement. Councilmember Paine asked about additional information regarding HCT communities. Mr. Toy answered the HCT communities was the basis for the 2044 targets. Councilmember Paine observed there were another 53,000 individuals that need to be accommodated across the HCT communities and asked when the City will find out Edmonds' portion. Mr. Toy referred to the slide entitled High -Capacity Transit Communities — Population, pointing out Edmonds' portion of the 53,000 population deficit is approximately 3,900 which means the overall population target will go from 43,000 (census 2020 population) to 56,000 by 2044. Similarly, Edmonds' portion of the 6,700 employment deficit is 510. Councilmember K. Johnson commented she found this information fascinating; she tried to study it in the packet but it is in black and white and a very small font. She observed there was a colored version and asked if that was available in print. Mr. Toy advised the published agenda included the colored PFD version. He offered to send a colored copy of the presentation to her directly. Mayor Nelson relayed the printer had been out of toner, so it was a onetime issue. Councilmember K Johnson commented the font was also very small, for example she was unable to read the key with her glasses on. She expressed appreciation for any colored version she could read. Interim Planning Manager advised he would provide that to Councilmember K. Johnson. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 33 7.4.a Councilmember Tibbott referred to including Edmonds in the HCT, pointing out the light rail station does not come very close to Edmonds. The best access is the Orange Line which ends in Lynnwood and there is no reliable transit route to the transit hub at the waterfront where the ferries and train come together. He objected to Edmonds being listed as a HCT community and asked the implications if Edmonds were not listed as a HCT community. Mr. Toy said the other category is cities and towns, jurisdictions that are not located on a HCT network. The definition of the HCT network includes bus rapid transit (BRT) and the ferry. Councilmember Tibbott commented Edmonds does not have BRT. Mr. Toy said the existing Blue Line on Highway 99 from Community Transit would have been taken into account. In addition to existing service, the HCT community definition takes into account planned service as well which would eventually include the Orange Line. Councilmember Tibbott pointed out the Orange Line ends in Lynnwood and the Blue Line covers only a very small section of Edmonds. Mr. Toy said BLR shows most of the capacity is on the Highway 99 corridor both long term and pending projects. Councilmember Tibbott observed it appeared most of the 3,900 would be in that area. Mr. Toy answered that is a choice the City would want to take a close look at in the comprehensive plan update and zoning to see if it makes sense to continue with that corridor as the location. In far as the BLR, 55% of the City's additional capacity out to 2035 is in GC corridor. The City may want to consider other options especially if the Orange Line eventually goes beyond Lynnwood. Community Transit is showing an eventual connection to the central area of City. Councilmember Tibbott commented Edmonds does not have an option to increase the urban growth area (UGA), but that might be possible in other parts of Snohomish County. Mr. Toy said the regional plan assumes very minor UGA expansion. Councilmember L. Johnson observed Mr. Toy indicated the City has adequate capacity to 2035 and that the BLR indicates Edmonds has a development capacity shortfall based on the initial 2044 growth targets. She asked what that means to current and future Edmonds residents if those goals are not met, especially with regard to the issue of housing costs and the rising issue of housing insecurity. Mr. Toy answered there is a regional goal on housing availability and affordability that needs to be addressed. The Housing HO5 report being developed this year at Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT) will get into questions about housing availability and affordability consistent with these population goals. There is a link between available housing, housing density and affordability as well as a link between housing type, tenure and affordability. A lot of attention is being paid to the missing middle housing category between single family housing and high density to see if more can be done in that category to help make up for affordability problems the region is experiencing. He observed there are a lot of tricky questions to pull out of the housing being built in relation to the population growth goals. The City may want to track the HO5 report which goes to the elected officials on SCT's steering committee just like the BRT did. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Tibbott that Edmonds is not a HCT community based on the fact there is no east -west connectivity and with the pandemic blowing up, there is almost nobody on buses anymore. She asked if putting Edmonds in the HCT category increased the population target, noting there has been little population growth in Edmonds and now the projection is to grow 13,113. She asked if that was due to the HCT community algorithms that were used. Mr. Toy answered it the regional plan defines the characteristic of jurisdictions that are part of HCT communities. The map showed the Swift Blue Line on Highway 99 and takes into account Community Transit's long range plan for the Orange Line. It also takes into account the location of the ferry terminal and commuter rail station. Mr. Toy continued, even though there is not a light rail station in Edmonds, there are other HCT facilities and services that exist or are planned within Edmonds. That became a major determinant in Vision 2050 for assigning further growth. The last time the regional plan was updated was 2008, prior to ST2 and the Lynnwood link extension and prior to the ST3 vote. Vision 2050 was based on the infancy of the light rail system. Once Vision 2050 was updated, there was ST2 and ST3 and the region's investments in the light Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 34 7.4.a rail system and the BRT system feeding into it became paramount and important in the growth assignments that the regional plan developed. Compared to past growth assigned to Edmonds, being in a HCT community means more is expected compared to past trends and targets. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was on SCT for 2010-2012 and remembered doing the CPPs. She recalled cities like Woodway had expected growth of 2,000 and their population is only 2,000. Edmonds should be tracking the data through the SCT representatives, noting SCT has approved all this information. Mr. Toy said the targets were recommended in September, Snohomish County Council held a hearing in February and adopted them into the CPP in February. That means the numbers for Edmonds need to be used in at least one of the plan alternatives that is studied. The City can study other levels of growth, lower or higher. If the City's preferred plan outcome differs from the initial targets, follow-up work needs to be done with SCT to reconcile those differences in 2024 and 2025. That is not always an easy thing to do because everyone will have adopted their comprehensive plans by then and the work will need to be retrofitted if the numbers change for Edmonds, whether a neighboring jurisdiction or Snohomish County. Even though there is a reconciliation phase, cities usually try to work out a plan adoption consistent with the initial targets. If that cannot be done, there is a process for trying to resolve those differences in 2024 and 2025. Councilmember Buckshnis said she found the report fascinating. She asked how the reasonable measures list was prepared and was it Edmonds related. Mr. Toy said the reasonable measures list is the most recent and is an appendix to the CPPs that were updated in October 2021 by Snohomish County following a SCT recommendation. It builds on the list originally developed in 2003. It is a long list of measures that can be considered in increasing capacity within a jurisdiction. They are part of the CPPs which means there is an obligation to look at them, but that does not mean all of them have to be adopted. If a determination is made that a measure is not reasonable, it would not apply. They are there to look at and consider and is important moving forward with the land use decisions the Snohomish County Council has to make regarding UGA expansion, whether all cities have gone through a comprehensive and full evaluation of reasonable measures within their jurisdictions that can be done to address growth before a UGA expansion is needed. Councilmember Chen commented this was fascinating information. He referred to slides 11 and 12, where additional housing units and employment opportunity appear to be concentrated in the Highway 99 area. He asked about the driver for those predictions, whether it was guidance from the county for Edmonds growth, the market, transportation driven, etc. Mr. Toy answered that is the translation of the current zoning and the observed densities, deducting for critical areas to ensure housing units are not placed on environmental sensitive areas, and depicting at a parcel level how many housing units could potentially be built and how much employment could occur in Edmonds. Those are the building blocks for the major conclusions in the BLR. Councilmember Chen asked with this type of growth prediction, would county and city resources such as fire, police and other services follow. Mr. Toy said the map is based on the current comprehensive plan and shows what the capital facilities and transportation, housing and land use elements could support. Those questions would have been answered in the City's last comprehensive plan update in 2015. These maps are specific to 2035, the plan horizon for the 2015 comprehensive plan update. In 2044, there will be an extra 9 years of growth, so the City will need to go through the same exercise to answer questions for the 2024 update whether the City has the services identified in the transportation, capital facilities, housing and utilities elements to accommodate growth out to 2044. If not, strategies need to be considered in the comprehensive plan to address that. The 2024 update is a City process that will occur over the next 2% years. Mr. Lien said staff has another presentation to describe what this means for the 2024 comprehensive plan update. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 35 7.4.a Council President Olson anticipated the answers to her questions are not for today, but wanted to put it on everyone's radar. The council was contacted in early March by an organized neighborhood at 160t' Place SW and 68t' Avenue, literally across the street from the Edmonds city limits. They have Edmonds addresses but are in unincorporated Snohomish County and feed into Meadowdale High School their activities are in Edmonds, and they consider themselves part of Edmonds. They are interested in annexing to Edmonds but are in the UGA for Lynnwood. She asked if there was any opportunity to alter that. Mr. Lien offered to follow up on that later. Mr. Toy said it has been done before, Bothell and Brier and Mill Creek and Bothell have worked out adjustments. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to a councilmember's claim that almost nobody rides the buses anymore, and agreed two years ago when the pandemic hit, transit ridership plummeted; however, that is no longer accurate as ridership has been steadily rising since then. Community Transit will provide an update on May 17t' and she looked forward to getting factual numbers from them. Ms. McLaughlin referred to the work ahead with the 2024 comprehensive plan update. She explained the following presentation is offered both as a reflection of where the City has been in the recent past and a primer of where the City is heading in the coming year plus. She explained the City needs to have a discussion about how the City wants to meet the targets in the 2044 growth targets. There are a lot of different options and a lot of them are in the reasonable measures; those are low, medium and high impact and the City can choose which ones will work for Edmonds. She presented regarding the Buildable Lands Report and Initial Growth Targets and Consideration of CPP reasonable measure and housing commission recommendations: • Agenda o Development Capacity & Initial Growth Targets ■ Gap between BLR development capacity and 2044 initial growth targets o Reasonable measures ■ Examples and Housing Commission recommendations that are consistent with adopted reasonable measures for increasing capacity o Comprehensive Plan Update ■ Consideration of Housing Commission recommendations as an alternative in the comprehensive plan Examples of reasonable measures from CPP: Increase Residential Capacity Increase Employment Capacity Support Increased Densities Small Impact Small -to Moderate Impact Small -to -Moderate Impact o Allow ADUs in SF zones o Develop an Economic o Streamline permitting o Allow co -housing Development Strategy process Moderate Impact Moderate Impact o Administrative procedural o Allow cottage cluster, duplex o Zone by building type, not reforms townhomes and by use (form -based code) o Allow mixed uses condominiums o Reduce off-street parking High Impact requirements o Mandate minimum Moderate -to -High Impact residential densities o Encourage development of o Mandate maximum lot sizes urban villages Housing Commission submitted 15 recommendations and 8 policy proposals to council in January 2021 o Six recommendations have been advanced or are already being done by Snohomish County, but while important, none are identified as reasonable measures to address insufficient population capacity. ■ Adopt Multifamily Design Standards ■ County Implementation of Sales and Use Tax for Housing and Related Services Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 36 7.4.a ■ Develop Community Housing Partners ■ Edmonds-HASCO Interlocal Agreement ■ Eliminate Discriminatory Provisions in Covenants and Deeds ■ Use of Existing Sales and Tax Revenue for Affordable and Supportive Housing o Six of the remaining recommendations are identified as reasonable measures in the CPP to address insufficient population capacity ■ Allow Cluster/Cottage Housing in SF and MF Zones ■ Allowed Detached Accessory Dwelling Units ■ Create Neighborhood Village Subarea Plans ■ Incentives for Development of affordable Missing Middle units ■ Missing Middle Housing in SF Neighborhoods ■ New SF Zoning Designation that allows Duplex to Fourplex Buildings with Zero Lot Line (specific to certain areas) o Allowing detached ADUs would help provide some help toward meeting our growth targets but is not expected to bridge the gap on its own ■ Allowed Detached Accessory Dwelling Units o House -scale Missing Middle building types is the topic of four recommendations ■ Allow Cluster/Cottage Housing in SF and MF Zones ■ Incentives for Development of affordable Missing Middle units ■ Missing Middle Housing in SF Neighborhoods ■ New SF Zoning Designation that allows Duplex to Fourplex Buildings with Zero Lot Line (specific to certain areas) o Creating Neighborhood Village Subarea Plans ■ When coupled with zoning changes to increase density could provide a moderate to high impact toward meeting our growth targets ■ Create Neighborhood Village Subarea Plans Comprehensive plan update preliminary timeline 2022-2024 o Background studies 2022-2023 o Visioning & SEPA Scoping Early 2022- Early 2023 o Draft EIS Mid 2022 to mid-2024 o Draft Comprehensive Plan Mid 2022 to mid-2024 o Final EIS Late 2023 o Public Hearings Early to mid-2024 o Adoption Late 2024 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Nelson relayed staff asked to pull Item 9.2, Award of Job Order Contracts, as it was not ready yet. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described the procedures for in -person audience comments. Jenna Nand, Edmonds, spoke on a topic raised at the last council meeting, the proposed use of American Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) funds to supplement funding for some sort of development at Yost Park. City employee Shannon Burley provided her the Treasury Final Rule. She described why she did not think it was appropriate to use ARPA funding at Yost Park. The Treasury Final Rule states ARPA funding can be used to support families and businesses struggling with public health and economic impacts, vital public services and support long term growth and opportunity and specifically used to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 37 7.4.a address economic harm to households, small businesses, nonprofits, impacted industries and the public center. She referred to a comment related to concern with not being able to adequately use ARPA funds before the expiration date. The timeline outlined in the Treasury Final Rule is that the cost must be incurred before or after March 3, 2021 and funds must be obligated by December 31, 2024 and must be expended by December 31, 2026. She thought there were more appropriate ways to use ARPA funds than at Yost Park and did not believe the taxpayers and voters wanted the funds to be allocated toward park development. She submitted a copy of the Treasury Final Rule. Priya Sinha, Edmonds, spoke in opposition to Ordinance 5.70. She assumed the commentary she provided last week would go on the record. Since providing those comments, she has done more research on the Boise ruling which is very narrow and based on the 8' Amendment, cruel and unusual punishment, and there is a lot of jurisprudence behind it. That jurisprudence clearly states no one can be criminalized simply for being, for being homeless, for being addicted to drugs or for being mentally ill. They have to be non -compliant with something else. The jurisprudence went to Supreme Court, the SCOTUS refused and it went into settlement in 2021. She distinguished this ordinance from what happened in Boise; in Boise, they weren't actually trying to ship out homeless people from town, they simply did not have enough shelter beds. She acknowledged there were limited hotel options in Edmonds and there are not enough shelters. The City is not offering shelters, but offering a bus pass out of Edmonds to sweep away people who are inconvenient into another town. This is a clear distraction between the Boise ruling and there are potential openings for litigation. She encouraged the council to look at the jurisprudence behind this ruling and these cases. Even if the courts allowed this sweeping away of the inconvenient from Edmonds, there is still the issue of the 8' Amendment, cruel and unusual punishment. She asked what if a mentally ill person simply cannot comply, or what if a shelter in Lynnwood cannot take a child over the age of 18, envisioning both situations would fall under the 8' Amendment. As the council considered this, she encouraged them to read the comments she submitted earlier but also look at the jurisprudence related to this and to see how the facts of the case differ from the Boise ruling as she did not think it was as clearcut as some think it is. Kate Sullivan, Edmonds, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance against camping in public. There is not enough affordable housing and not enough housing in western Washington. If a homeless person from Edmonds gets a shelter bed in Lynnwood, that is one less bed for a homeless person in Lynnwood, a zero sum game, someone has to lose. If this proposed ordinance does not decrease homelessness, she questioned what it does. It intimidates, terrorizes, says you are not wanted here, we don't care about you, get out of my sight. She did not think a person's desire not to see a homeless camp in the woods was more important than a person's right to rest their head. The ordinance threatens cruel and unusual punishment against people in dire straits. People need to be helped, not threatened, shamed or punished. More affordable housing must be created. She urged the council to vote no on this heartless ordinance. Lisa Utter, Lynnwood, Chair of the Emergency Cold Weather Shelter for South Snohomish County, provided information from the last season. Generally there is a capacity of 50, but due to COVID that was reduced to 16; with filtration, that number was increased last year to 23. The shelter was open 30 nights and provided 312 bed nights and served 96 individuals, the vast majority of whom are single men. There is no shelter in south Snohomish County at all for single men, the only one is for women and children and has very limited space. The shelter served ages 18 to someone in their 70s. That is not usually, a wide range of people seek shelter and many years they serve people in wheelchairs or who use walkers. She expressed concern with the ordinance related to unlawful occupation of public property, acknowledged the important of having tools to ensure everyone can enjoy parks and other public spaces and amenities, but it is important to remember the majority of the homeless were born and raised here or have lived here a long time and it is very easy to be tipped over into homelessness. She was surprised by the City's study that found there were 450 homeless people in Edmonds; it is a much bigger problem than people are Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 38 7.4.a aware of. Criminalizing people for existing and for sleeping is the opposite of being an inclusive and welcoming neighborhood and city that Edmonds claims to be and it is being a bad neighbor to push people out into neighboring cities. Having been a councilmember for Lynnwood, she knew it was one big community and boundaries really don't mean much. Causing people to move without any place to move to goes against the spirit if not the actual law. Leah Pastrana, Edmonds, said she was born and raised in Seattle, has owned a home in Edmonds for eight years and has worked for Seattle Municipal Court for 17 years as a probation counselor. She stressed the importance of having a plan in place if this ordinance passes and to not implement it until there is a plan in place. There are a lot of resources in the community including the police department, herself and the Edmonds municipal court and it was important to work together for a plan. Doing this without services will not work, it could be very unsuccessful and be very detrimental. People need to be meet where they are, be mindful of the reasons the person is sleeping in a park, what happened to them and recognizing they are human. She stressed the importance of putting collaboration and planning in place before this is implemented. Additionally, it would be great not to impose a fine or have opportunities for community services or classes; she teaches a life skills class in Seattle that is very beneficial. Even though Edmonds is small, there are homeless people who need assistance and attention. A colleague who saw an ordinance passed in Auburn uses three words: accountability, compassion and community. Those needs to be at the forefront when the City moves forward with this ordinance. Ed Lorah, Edmonds, a clinical social worker, mostly retired but still licensed by the State of Washington, said he worked in his early career as a case manager with homeless mentally ill people in Pioneer Square in Seattle, specifically people coming out of the jail. Their mission was to try to keep people out of jail. Over a five year period, they reduced recidivism by case management and partnering with people released from jail, helping them get settled and into treatment and seeing them daily, an intensive case management program that was very successful. He agreed with the comments of previous speakers, and added without resources and resorting only to punitive measures, those efforts are doomed to failure. There is a long tradition of moving homeless people along as seen in Seattle with sweeps; those people disappear from that location, regroup and return which does not really resolve the problem, it just kicks the can down the road even further. If a homeless person commits a crime, the police probably need to be involved, but for the police to ticket people for sleeping in the park or arrange transportation to non- existent shelter beds feels like a complete waste of time for the police and indicates the need for social workers. He urged the council to reject the ordinance, stating it was dead in the water without shelter backup. The council needs to think about the commitment to resources; there need to be shelter beds and outreach teams; this population often does not seek help, there needs to be outreach in order to be successful. Maralyn Chase, Edmonds (Esperance), commented when elected officials take the oath of office, they promise to follow the constitution, obey the laws and represent all the people. That means even the people who are homeless and living on the streets and in parks. The greater Seattle area has five times as many homeless people as Chicago; she knows many people come to Seattle believing there are opportunities, but opportunities are not necessarily available to them. Esperance is along Highway 99 and they are considering annexing Highway 99 if they become a city. Highway 99 pays a lot of taxes to Edmonds. If the ordinance passes, the Edmonds Police Department will spend a lot of time trying to shlep homeless people and their belongings across the country or across the state. She expressed concern there were not enough police to move the homeless and their belonging and fine them $1000 if they don't have. Since Highway 99 has a high crime rate, she questioned who would be protecting the taxpayers if the police are dealing with the homeless people. This is not the way to solve the problem of homelessness; there is simply not enough housing. Housing and infrastructure needs to be built instead of chasing homeless people who don't have any place to go. Maybe there need to be tents and tent cities like the farmer workers in eastern Washington. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 39 Ken Reidy, Edmonds, appreciated the previous speaker mentioning oaths of office and the constitution; both are very important. There can be value in acknowledging things from the past as is stated at the beginning of every council meeting. He encouraged elected officials to expand what they acknowledge; doing so can build trust and restore citizen confidence in government. One thing the council can do is acknowledge what has been done to property owners during street vacations. He suspected it got so bad that efforts were initiated in 2019 to change the street vacation laws; those efforts failed dramatically. In 2019, the council's 5-2 vote was not respected. He suggested councilmembers read his letter to the editor, "What Can Be Learned from a Failed Legislative Process." He asked the council to consider expanding acknowledgment of things from the past including the City's history with WCIA and encouraged the council to initiate the process of ending the City's WCIA membership. He referred to the earlier meeting where there was discussion of adopting rules of procedures related to filling a council vacancy. That process is codified in ECC 1.02.035 as well as governed under state law. The last time it was done, the code was not followed. He pointed that out but nothing happened. He recalled the presenter regarding buildable lands said Edmonds does not want to build on critical area, commenting he laughed at that because Edmonds has a long history of building in critical areas under the concept of one house can be built on each lot except if you are Donna Breske. He recommended that be reviewed, noting the City has allowed many homes to be built in critical areas. Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments. 8:23 Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, commented a majority of homeless people are challenged with mental health issues and drug dependency. Years ago they rented their home through the Section 8 Housing Authority to a woman whose adult daughter was homeless due to mental illness and refusing medical assistance. Her daughter set seven fires and burned their house down. The renter apologized but was thankful because her daughter would finally get the help she refused, available only after she had been arrested. A previous speaker spoke about help acquired after being jailed; a lot of people are becoming invisible because the police have to ignore them. It is difficult for the families of mentally ill adults; they fear for their safety or that they may hurt someone else. The intent of the ordinance is to relocate people living in tents with no bathroom, safety, windows or doors and house them in hotels or shelters and connect them to people and family who can assist them. Making the act of refusing safety and available shelter illegal is not criminalizing homelessness; it is helping those who can't help themselves. Regarding the tree ordinance, in 2015 only 2.8% of Edmonds' land was vacant single family zoned buildable, 167 acres. Today's report did not state the current amount and she was certain it was less, yet instead of encouraging owners of vacant land to build desperately needed single family homes, the planning department and city council have created expensive obstacles. The tree ordinance requires even those retaining the required 30% of trees, to pay the city the worth trees needing removal before allowing division or building of homes, $3,000 to $12,000 each, devaluing all single family vacant land in Edmonds by the worth of the trees. Ms. Ferkingstad continued, most people want to live in single family homes and land is gold in Edmonds but has become undesirable, damaging the potential for desperately needed homes. With the $2.00/square foot cap, the added cost is over $107,000 for their acre. The remaining trees involuntarily become protected by the City forever, leaving new homeowners with no rights to their trees, an illegal taking and violation of the 5t1i and 14' Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Tree penalties raise the costs of permits and regulations and rising construction cost have greatly increased the cost of new housing in Edmonds. The City is extorting money from owners of buildable land to deter them from building needed homes because of a renewable resources, trees. She asked if this was necessary since Edmonds has more tree canopy than it did 20 years ago. She requested the council rescind the illegal penalties imposed on vacant land owners and instruct the planning department to follow the intent of the law instead of using it to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 40 7.4.a punish those providing needed housing. She offered to provide further information regarding discrepancies in the tree canopy report. Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, spoke regarding why the Unocal property does not make sense as an open space acquisition. She offered three of many points she could make. First, pocket estuaries are prioritized salmon habitat. The Unocal property is not marsh; it is an industrially developed, contaminated fill pad and stormwater treatment pond. She wanted to be blunt about this because it was a point often missed in the City's discussion. The Unocal property does not contain prioritized habitats. Second, in relation to the planning board's February 23' comments and council comments on March 22' at the PROS Plan public hearing, both completely disregarded the PROS Plan outreach by deciding that Edmonds residents didn't really mean it when they overwhelmingly prioritized underserved areas for open space investment. Both the planning board and council also intimated a connection between natural features and open space investment. Instead of pragmatically applying the same standard across the City, the council directed staff to rewrite the definition of open space in the latest drafts to support acquisition of the Unocal property that contains no natural features. Why does the board and council use natural features as first a false accusation when there are habitat features in SR-99 and south Edmonds to invest in commensurate with the existing growth? In addition, a requirement for investment in underserved areas that the council is unwilling to apply to the Unocal property. The marina which created the fish passage barrier and Unocal terminal were both constructed prior to the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species, National Environmental Policy Act and any modern environmental regulation. These developments would not be permitted in today's regulatory environment. Imagine the Unocal property was developed in alignment with its current mixed use classification; a bevy of federal and state regulations including the Shoreline Management Act and other critical area regulations would be in effect. Ms. Seitz continued, any construction would be well setback from the marsh and on the contaminated fill pad. Plantings would be required and it is entirely within reason that the City could require a conservation easement on the southern portion of the property as part of the development process. While she disagreed with this alignment as the best solution and many aspects of the 2015 feasibility study for Willow Creek daylighting, the fact is it never envisioned the purchase of the Unocal property was necessary to implement the proposed alignment. She questioned why the City was making it a priority to pay over $8 million for a negligible environment lift and outcomes that could be obtained for free by having a developer pay for them. The City isn't going to remove the contaminated fill pad, a fact proven by the Edmonds Waterfront key findings and recommendations memo. The recommendation is for the site to be a roadway, not restored. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, the conclusion is that is just another way for downtown interests to subvert the existing land use classification and prevent development and growth. She found it more than little disappointing that the City would take staff and resources away from projects that would result in environment lift to do this. She also worried about the leadership it represents; the inability to require those responsible for fish passage barriers to be part of the solution, coupled with absolute inability to consider cost effective solutions for the environment so that more can get done in more locations. The City is failing on both counts. Finis Tupper, Edmonds, suggested the council put an update to the Edmonds Community Development Code on their agenda, specifically Chapter 20.25 which relates to housing for low income elderly. There are a lot of other demographics that are low income and this section dates back to the Jim Crow laws that did not want a lot of single mothers with a bunch of children, cars, and boyfriends in multifamily areas. When talking about outlawing sleeping on public property, everyone needs to admit there isn't a lot of low income housing. He has talked to several councilmembers about this law since he has lived in Edmonds over the past 42 years. The City needs to provide more affordable housing, noting there was a project in process on Highway 99. He summarized this section of the code needs to be updated. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 41 7.4.a Owen Lee, a high school student, spoke against the ordinance entitled Unlawful Occupation of Public Property and urged council to reject the ordinance. She agreed with the earlier comments, finding it appalling that so many people in the City have requested an ordinance like this be passed. Criminalization of the homeless is a policy devoid of empathy and cruel. She appreciated that there were a lot of other issues at play and urged those who support the ordinance to consider other methods that could be used to address the homelessness issue such as more funding for the human services department, more public spaces for homeless people, more infrastructure to support homeless people and addressing root causes of homelessness. She found the proposed ordinance very unfortunate and as a young person, hoped it was not passed into law. Strom Peterson, State Representative and former Edmonds Councilmember, spoke against the ordinance related to unlawful camping on public property. As he said in a letter sent to the council and published in the Edmonds Beacon, he believed this was a shortsighted ordinance and one that needed to be tabled to continue the conversation. He encouraged the council to have conversations with groups and organizations that work on the front lines of this issue. He chairs the Housing, Human Services & Veterans Committee in Olympia and meet with groups often. There is not a single group working day-to- day with people experiencing homelessness that thinks such an ordinance is a good idea. It sends a bad message that those experiencing homelessness are somehow other than the rest of us and instead local, city, county, state and federal and non-profit efforts and the community as a whole need to be focused on finding solutions that actually work and that provide services. He recalled the council holding numerous meetings on streateries, stating those facing homelessness deserve at least that much time for discussion. Virsten Snyder said she is a non -practicing attorney who has worked in a different court systems as well as pro-bono service with indigent and struggling populations, a person who has struggled with mental illness herself, spending the better part of last April in a psych hospital, the most traumatizing, difficult and scary thing in her life and she was grateful to make it through. Dehumanizing is the worst possible thing in treating people. She failed to see what possible good the proposed ordinance could do; it was literally making the issue worse financially on the system and on taxpayers. It involves not just police time but also court time which is very expensive along with enormous administration costs. No one is going to jail because they slept somewhere; even if the City creates this minor misdemeanor, it is not a jailable offense. It just saddles people with financial obligations they cannot pay for processes that are not helpful and dehumanizing. She questioned whether more services or more beds alone was the issue and recommended taking on single family zoning. She found it concerning and the height of immorality that it was legal anywhere in Washington. Edmonds and Shoreline are part of the same housing and job market and she appreciated the planning to meet anticipated housing and job growth. Although there are not many jobs in downtown Edmonds, the salaries offered have increased in recent months. She was concerned with housing for seniors, middle class and upper middle class being displaced by competition and housing availability if major changes are not made to allow the market to meet the need and doing so with transportation planning in a more economical way. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, recognized there were homeless people living in vans, etc. and she also know what goes on in encampments. Heroin, meth and crack are not legal, and she was concerned with robberies and crash and bangs, the inability let children play outside, and finding needles in parks. She was afraid in her own house. She referred to tiny houses in Seattle that were empty because residents could not do drugs there. Meth and crack are flammable and hazmat suits are required for cleanup. While she is compassionate toward people with drug problems, the only way to help is to get them help. Money is required for addicts to feed their drug habit which is the reason for robberies. Residents should not be afraid when leaving their houses that they will be crashed and banged and robbed. She has known several drug addicts and was aware how hard it was to get off crack and meth. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 42 7.4.a Jennifer Delia Bereskin, spoke to the proposed ordinance, advising she has been homeless as a child in Snohomish County for over 25 years. She initially had a low income voucher and was living in Edmonds; currently she is in the unincorporated area because she was unable to have sustainable housing in Edmonds. The proposed ordinance tells her that a person with long-term childhood poverty and trauma and housing instability are not accepted into the community. Residents of Edmonds stand on the bones of her ancestors; her ancestors who stood there since time immemorial and before the new people came and decided they would make this their home, no one in their villages or communities were homeless. The homeless are human beings, children and elders. This is one of the richest countries in the world and we are unable to feed and house people. What is the root cause? She serves on Governor Jay Inslee's Poverty Work Group to dismantle poverty in Washington State and has been working at the state level on these issues. As elected officials, it is the council's job to ensure they are serving all constituents, not just the ones who say we don't want these people in our City. The homeless are human beings, people's parents and people's children. She hoped anyone who supported this ordinance never experienced homelessness because anyone can become homeless. Gerald Bernstein, Edmonds, expressed support for helping the homeless and getting treatment for those who need it; giving them a place to sleep in the park is not treatment, it is not humane, not healthy and condemns them to a short life. Little has been said about the residents of Edmonds; this is a multi- dimensional problem that is being dealt with in a one-dimensional way. When thinking about the homeless, one also needs to think about the rest of the community and the impacts on them. The impact on residents in Seattle, Los Angeles and others has not been good or healthy. 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item 7.7 be removed from the consent agenda so the ordinance number could be provided. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 2022 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 26, 2022 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS 4. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF CANDIDATE TO A BOARD/COMMISSION 5. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1.04 ECC RELATED TO HYBRID MEETINGS, TIME/PLACE OF REGULAR COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND PROVISIONS FOR RECESSES, ADJOURNMENTS, AND CONTINUANCES ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND (ARPA) LANGUAGE CHANGES Councilmember Buckshnis asked for the ordinance number. City Clerk Scott Passey advised it was Ordinance No. 4259. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 43 7.4.a COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4259, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 4229 PERTAINING TO THE EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 4237. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. PUBLIC HEARING 1. RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY CODE AMENDMENTS PUBLIC HEARING Planning Manager Kemen Lien reviewed: • What is a family? o Changes across time and cultures o Traditionally two or more people related by blood and marriage o Modern families include single parent households, foster families, same -sex couples, child free families and many variations of the traditional norms o Some people do not grow up with the family of orientation but become part of a stepfamily or blended family o Updated definitions of family provide a more realistic and inclusive definition of family • Senate Bill 5235 0 2021 State Legislation o Prohibits local governments from limiting the number of unrelated persons occupying a home o Exceptions for short-term rentals, Building Code occupancy loads, some group homes o Also addressed owner occupancy requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units (Governor Vetoed Section) • Conflicting Edmonds Code Definition of Family —ECDC 21.30.010 A. Family means individuals consisting of two or more persons related by genetics, adoption, or marriage, or a group of five or fewer persons who are not related by genetics, adoption, or marriage and none of whom are wards of the court unless such wards are related by genetics, adoption, or marriage to all of the members of such group living in a dwelling unit. D. Calculation of Residents 1. When one or more unrelated persons reside with a family whose members are related by genetics, adoption or marriage, the total number of residents shall not exceed five persons except as provided in subsection (D)(2) of this section. 2. A family unit consisting entirely of persons related by genetics, adoption or marriage may rent a room to a total of two additional renters, or up to two students as a part of a recognized foreign exchange program • Proposed Code Amendments o Removes Residential Occupancy Limits per State Legislation o Strengthens Structural / Element requirements for Single Family Dwellings (One Water, Gas and Electric Meter ... Common Access to Rooms) o Maintains Limits on Number of Dwellings in Single Family Zoning o Maintains Restrictions on Group Homes • Definition of Family — 21.30.010 o Removes occupancy limitation o Family means individuals eensisting of eweor- mefe ^ related ^r- unfelated by ge eties adoption, or- . - I i gFoup of five or- fewer- pefseas who are not related by geneties- by geneties adeption,-er- fnafr-i-age-te- all ofthe members of sueh gfoup living in a dwelling unit. o Removed subsection to calculate occupancy limits (Sub D) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 44 7.4.a o Maintains subsections on Group Living (Sub B) and Exclusions from Family Definition (Sub C) o Maintains provisions limiting rental of ADU to either primary house or ADU o Maintains provision allowing normal hosting activities (guests and visitors) Dwelling Unit Definitions 21.90.080 Single-family dwelling unit o Strengthens and adds criteria for definition o Maintains requirement for one family and one dwelling unit per lot o Adds requirement to: ■ Be limited to one mailbox, water meter, gas meter and electric meter (Properties with an approved ADU may have an additional mailbox) ■ Have common access to and common use of all living, kitchen, and eating areas 21.20.050 Dwelling unit o Strengthens and aligns better with State's definition o Add portion that state it includes permanent provisions for living sleeping eating, cooking and sanitation. Chapter 20.21 ECDC — ADU 20.21.030 Criteria for attached accessory dwelling units. D. Add one gas meter and provision for an addition mailbox F. Occupancy o Removes occupancy limits and exceptions for nurses and caregivers o Maintains owner occupancy requirements 20.21.020 Density limitation —Limitation on the total occupancy o Removes reference to the exceptions listed in 20.21.030 o Maintains the density limits for ADUs Recommendation o Adopt proposed amendments with ordinance in Exhibit 8 Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing and described the procedures for in -person public testimony. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, relayed the City code says the planning board shall do research and investigation on specific projects assigned to it by the mayor and council. The planning board is to analyze data collected, arrange for public participation and organize its findings. The planning board is to then present its findings to the mayor and city council and may recommend a course of action giving reasons for such recommendation. As a citizen, he would greatly prefer the planning board be here tonight to present its findings, recommend a course of action and give reasons for their recommendation. He did not understand why, when items are assigned to the planning board, the planning board doesn't come and make their recommendation directly to the mayor and city council. He anticipated that would work better than having staff present the planning board's recommendation. He recalled with the street vacation code update in the past, staff brought forth their own recommendation and put it next to the planning board's recommendation and no one from the planning board was present to speak to their recommendation. Mr. Reidy recommended the city council reassign the SB5235 issue back to the planning board to consider whether it is appropriate for the City code to define the word family. He suggested there may be a better term; some jurisdictions now use household. He read the proposed definition of family: family means individuals related or unrelated by genetics, adoption or marriage living in a dwelling unit. He questioned the purpose of, related or unrelated by genetics, adoption of marriage in the definition. The definition can be shorted to a very simple, family means individuals living in a dwelling unit. He questioned whether family should be defined in the City code, and whether all individuals living together in a dwelling unit want to be labeled as a family. In this era when it is very important what people are called, the code states if someone is living with others in a dwelling unit, they are all a family. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 45 7.4.a questioned whether there were legal consequences if individuals living together in a dwelling unit were defined as a family. He questioned if there was a better way to comply with S135235. Mayor Nelson described procedures for providing public testimony virtually. Kirsten Snyder said she had no problems with the proposal, finding it pretty basic and straightforward without major changes other than changing language to better reflect current nomenclature. She commented it was important to consider doing a lot more especially when homelessness is a problem but many do not want to allow more housing. She did not want to take down trees, lose open space or take away anyone's preferred neighborhood characteristics, but when one house is replaced by a four-plex, it is not the end of the world. Supply and demand is in effect across the regional housing market, not just in Edmonds. Edmonds' restrictive zoning is dramatically suppressing housing supply and affordability which she felt was the number one driver of homelessness. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, suggested if a four-plex was built in a neighborhood, it should be one story. So many trees had been cut down that they no longer have a territorial view. She did not object to helping people and when she referred to people as those people, she did not mean it as a bad thing. She relayed one of her best friends was addicted to crack and took her life because she was unable to break her addiction. She also had another friend who got addicted to drugs. She suggested building 10-15 one-story units in a semi -circle with green areas. She did not hate people who live in camps, but a meth labs in a park that blows up could start a substantial fire. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked staff for a complete packet. She agreed with Mr. Reidy, SB5235 prohibits local governments from limiting the number of unrelated persons occupying a home. She was uncertain about defining individuals occupying a home as a family. She asked if there was a reason for retaining "family" in the chapter. Mr. Lien said there are single family zones so if "family" is in the name of the zone, there needs to be a definition of family. This code always amends what a dwelling unit is; single family zones regulate density based on the number of dwelling units. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if could be changed to individuals in a dwelling unit. City Attorney Jeff Taraday responded there are several ways the code could have been amended to comply with state law. He recalled when working with Eric on this several months ago, the intent was for the amendment to be as limited in scope as possible to comply with the new state law and not get into making a lot of elective code changes. If the council wants staff to go further and increase the scope of the amendment to get rid of "family" in the code, that could be done at council direction. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested saying family or individuals in a dwelling unit. Mr. Reidy made a valid point, there may have unrelated people in a household who are not family but are living in the dwelling unit. Mr. Taraday responded the zones could be renamed to single household zone. The word family could be removed from every aspect of the code, but that will take a while and might be more work that one thinks. Mr. Lien reiterated the definition of family is individuals related or unrelated by genetics, adoption of marriage living in a dwelling unit. Council President Olson said she could see the complication of changing that definition now. When she was made aware of the state law change, it was clear there was no single family zoning if the definition of who can live in a household changes. She was satisfied with this for now. Approval is scheduled for May 17' as the council does not usually vote the same night as a public hearing. If something comes up in the interim or if there is a better approach that does not parlay into a total code rewrite at this time, possibly that could be incorporated. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 46 7.4.a 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE HIGHWAY 99 GATEWAY - REVITALIZATION STAGE 2 PROJECT Interim Public Works Director Rob English introduced Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss and Lisa Reid, Project Engineer, SO Consultants. Mr. Hauss reviewed: • Vicinity Map o Project Limits from 244th St SW to 210th St SW • Project Description o Installation of landscaped raised median with mid -block left turn pockets along 2 1/4 mile of Hwy 99 corridor from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW with (130) trees (including Hornbean, Magnolia, Parrotia, Maidenhair, and Zelkova trees). o Gateway signs on both end of corridor (north of 244th St. SW and 212th St. SW). o HAWK signal — 600' north of 234th St. SW (in front of CHC) Possible Speed Limit Reduction from 45 mph to 40 mph Gateway Signs ,, Uad North South Hawk Signal — 600' north of Highway 99 @ 234" St SW Bid result Contractor Amount Westwater construction $6,632,644 A-1 Landscaping and Const $8,846,948 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 23 Packet Pg. 47 Engineer's Estimate 1 $5,230,000 Ms. Reid explained the difference between the bids is approximately 26%. She reviewed: • Bid Climate & Trend In Construction Costs o Construction costs continuing to rise due to COVID, concrete strike and new funding ■ Skilled labor shortage ■ Material pipeline and costs ■ Project delay ■ Strong backlog ■ Fewer bidders • Seattle — Construction Cost Index CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX (January 2009 - 100) 179 175 — Seattle 1E5 National 155 167 145 136 139 14 135 12f 126 125 112 116 131 135 138 115 104 107 io6 96 97 ]01 111 114 127 122 85 101 104 107 85 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 • Seattle — Construction Employment SEATTLE CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT (Number of Employees and 12-Month Change) 30K +5% +6% *3% -1% .3% 25K +16% 20K -24% .8% +3% +10% *9% 19l e SIX � 5K OK — Dec DK DeC Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dee Dec Dee Dec 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 • Material Pricing Change MATERIAL PRICING CHANGES (Cumulative Q4 2019 to Q4 2021) 125% 100% 75% 5N 25% 0% -25% tamper+115% PVC pipe +110% Copper Pipe -80% CappervAre -66% Plywood +58% Reinforcing Material 38% Q4 QS Q2 Q3 Q4 QS Q2 Q3 Q4 Structural steel 35% 2019 2020 2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021 • Similar WSDOT Bids (Mar -Apr 2022) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 24 Packet Pg. 48 7.4.a 3/2 Delphi Rd to I-5 Paving and Concrete Barrier E Sunset Way Vic & NB Lowell Rd Vic PCCP Exp Int Rehab & 3/2 Deck Overlay 3/9 Murden Creek Remove Fish Barrier 3/16 SR 104, Edmonds Ferry Terminal Paving Preservation 3/23 2022 Eastern Region Chip Seal - South 3/30 US 195, Old BNRR Bridge to Ict SR 271 PCCP Rehabilitation 4/13 SR 20, Rocky Creek to Granite Creek BST 4/13 SR 163, Tahlequah Ferry Terminal - Facility ADA Compliance 4/20 Dusty to Colfax Add Climbing Lanes 4/27 US 2, East of Leavenworth Slope Stabilization # ENGINEER'S LOW �10 OV LDS ESTIMATE BID#_ EE 3 $1,355,873 $1,602,396 118% 3 $10,293,106 $13,388,943 130% 2 $5,485,328 $7,691,568 140% 2 $255,877 $357,600 140% 1 $9,327,813 $12,979,000 139% 2 $6,735,196 $7,916,365 11B% 2 $7,467,042 $8,305,491 111% 2 $305,920 $426,794 140% 3 $5,901,635 $7,442,000 126% 2 $192,851 $259,651 135% AVERAGES = 2.2 _ $ 732,064. $6,036,981 130% Mr. English reviewed: • ProDOSed Construction Budeet Description Amount Contract Award $ 6,632,644 Gateway Signs & Corten Steel Elements Estimate $ 100,000 Construction Management, Inspection & Testing (16%) $ 1,061,223 WSDOT $ 30,000 1 % for Art on local funding $ 2,700 Management Reserve 10% $ 663,300 Total $ 8,489,867 • Construction Funding Funding Source Amount State Connecting Washington Funds $7,202,000 Additional State Connecting Washington Funds (Stage 3) $1,017,900 126 REET Fund $ 270,000 Total $ 8,489,900 • HiLrhwav 99 Transportation Fundine Stage Description Funds Source Status Stage 1 Corridor Study $430,000 State CNW Complete Stage 2 Highway 99 Gateway- Revitalization $9,40,900 State CNW Construction 2022 Stage 3 Highway 99 (2441 to 2381) $27,197,100 State CNW/MoveWA Begin Design 2022 Stage 4 Highway 99 (2201 to 2241) $3,212,000 State CNW/Fed STP Begin Design 2022 Total $40,580,000 • Construction timeline 0 151 working days, 6.8 months o Start early June o Bulk of construction complete before end of year o Weather dependent work completed in spring 2023 o HAWK signal installed spring 2023 due to supply chain issues • Right -of -Way Acquisition — three parcels o Council approved one o A settlement agreement has been reached on a second and will be presented to council soon o The third, Pacific Place Apartments, is under review by HUD • Plan to have robust public outreach effort Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 25 Packet Pg. 49 N d r 7 C 0 C d d c 0 c.� 0 0 Q. CL Q N c c r a� a� M L N N 0 N M 0 u� 0 c d E z U M a 7.4.a • Construction management contracts will come to council in the future • Staff Recommendation o Award a Construction Contract to Westwater Construction Company for $6,632,644 o Authorize a 10% Management Reserve of $663,300. Council President Olson observed the amount in the packet is less than the amount in the presentation. She asked if the $100,000 contract will come to the council at a later date. Mr. English advised the $100,000 is a separate contract. Council President Olson said she when adds the amounts in the staff recommendation, it does not total $8.4 million. Mr. English said the staff recommendation is the contract award which is $6,632,644. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO AWARD THE HIGHWAY 99 GATEWAY REVITALIZATION STAGE 2 PROJECT TO WESTWATER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,632,644 AND AUTHORIZE A MANAGEMENT RESERVE OF $663,300. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the entire amount should be awarded. Mr. English answered this is just the contract to Westwater Construction. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed appreciation for Ms. Reid's analysis. She anticipated there will be a lot of construction, supply, and labor issues. She asked about funding for Stage 3. Mr. English answered it includes funding from the Move Ahead Washington program the legislature approved this spring. Councilmember Buckshnis asked where those funds are housed. Mr. English answered it is a reimbursement program; the City spends the money and seeks reimbursement. Councilmember Paine thanked staff for answering questions for her about the timeline. She was excited that something may be underway this time next year. It is important to understand pressures related to major construction projects and the importance of moving faster because everyone is in same pipeline for the same people. She had hoped when the Highway 99 redevelopment was first discussed that there would be an opportunity to underground some power lines, but it is too expensive. Councilmember Chen thanked Mr. English, Mr. Hauss and Ms. Reid, stating he excited for this project as his home and business are both close to Highway 99. A member of the gateway sign committee, he recalled there were originally plans to acquire property from the Toyota dealership for the north gateway sign, but the council later decided not to do that. He wanted to confirm that was the case. Mr. English answered that was correct. Councilmember Chen said when he googled Westwater Construction there were several. He asked staff to provide background for this contractor. Mr. English answered this is first time the City has worked with them. Reference checks were positive; they have done work for City of Bothell, Pierce Transit, City of Renton, City of Seattle. The City of Bothell was very complimentary of Westwater and the work they did building the first stage of their Main Street project. There were a lot of challenges with old infrastructure and unforeseen conditions and Westwater worked well with them. Councilmember Chen asked if they were located in Renton. Mr. English offered to find out and inform Councilmember Chen. Councilmember Chen observed Westwater in Renton had only nine employees and he was concerned whether they could handle a project this size. Mr. English assured they have the capacity to do the work, noting the Bothell project was close to $5 million. Ms. Reid answered that likely was just their permanent employees; their seasonal employees are classified differently. Councilmember Chen commented one of the functions of Job Order Contracting is looking at contractors by diversity profile. The sentiment now is inclusion and inclusivity. He asked if any consideration is given to that when awarding contracts, whether bids are sent to different people with that consideration in Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 26 Packet Pg. 50 7.4.a mind. Mr. English answered there is an apprentice requirement for this contract; there is an encouraged DBE goal with the contract, a state requirement with the Connection Washington funds. Councilmember Chen commented there can be rules and regulations, but it comes down to implementation. When the bids are send out, that criteria need to be kept in mind. Councilmember K. Johnson recalled this came before the Parks and Public Works Committee who suggested it come to full council due to the size and the importance of the project. She supports the project 100% but has some lingering questions. Each time projects are presented, she raises these issues and is not sure she gets a response. She asked about bicycles on the Highway 99 corridor, whether they were supposed to ride on sidewalk, in the BRT lane, be walked, etc. The City is imposing more requirements for bicycle racks and storage, but there is no plan for how the bikes are used in corridor. She questioned who people living in the apartments are supposed to get to the Swift station on their bikes to reach light rail. That is a question that needs to be answered, not tonight but eventually. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to the pictures of the new facility and asked if there would be any ADA conflicts. Their appear to be a lot of plantings and lighting and she wanted to ensure the sidewalk would be ADA accessible. She supported moving forward with this project tonight, noting it was unfortunate it was 25% above the engineers estimate, but as the City experienced with Civic, waiting just makes more expensive. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. AWARD JOB ORDER CONTRACTS This item was removed from the agenda. 3. SCREENINGS CONVEYOR REQUEST TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL WWTP Manager Pamela Randolph commented this item has a quick turnaround; if a decision can be made quickly the project can move forward, otherwise it could delay the project. This request is authorization to purchase and install a new screenings conveyor at the WWTP. She reviewed: • Background o During the pricing of the Carbon Recovery Project, the project team identified several pieces of equipment that if replaced during construction (due to their location and interaction with other newly installed equipment), could result in a cost savings to the ratepayers o The equipment identified has not been priced, purchased or installed due to the impacts and supply chain issues associated with the pandemic. This purchase is the exception. o Due to reoccurring failures, compatibility with new equipment, improvement safety and reduced vector attraction, we recommend purchasing and installing this equipment now. • Photos of current screenings conveyor o Belt segments often break and must be manually repaired. When segments break, solids build up and create unsanitary conditions o Material clings to the belt and cannot be scraped off due to the original design o Material clings to the belt and collects in the bottom pan. Staff must remove the material manually • Photo of proposed screenings screw conveyor o Cleaner installation, frees up space, does not allow material to collect underneath, and will reduce odor and vector attraction o The WWTP has standardized on this type of conveyor Diagram of proposed screenings screw conveyor Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 27 Packet Pg. 51 7.4.a o Design of the screw conveyor shows better access and cleaner installation. This reduces maintenance costs and improves working conditions for staff The requested authorization has three elements 1. Purchase of equipment (sole source) $100,831.25 2. Change order for installation $102,217. 28 3. Mgmt reserve $20,000.00 Not to exceed including tax $223,048.53 If approved, the expense will be shared with our treatment plant partners in the following manner o City of Shoreline $21,162.84 o City of Mountlake Terrace $51,689.27 o Olympic View Water District $36,916.76 o City of Edmonds $113,279.66 Staff requests the city council authorize the mayor to approve the sole source purchase and change order for the installation of the new screenings screw conveyor. Council President Olson asked if the city attorney has looked at this and determined the City can legally use a sole source. Mr. English answered Sharon Cates, Lighthouse Law Group, has reviewed the contract. Ms. Randolph said they reviewed the sole source justification and the warranty terms. They have one more item to work out before the purchase order is issued. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AUTHORIZE THE SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF A NEW SCREENINGS SCREW CONVEYOR AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A CHANGE ORDER FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE CONVEYOR. Councilmember Paine commented it looks like everything in the plant has been replaced. Ms. Randolph answered there was a lot of 30 year old equipment and there is still more. Councilmember Paine asked about the condition of the other equipment. Ms. Randolph answered the incinerator failed last summer and was shut down on July 1st. To this point blowers and screw presses have been replaced and the incineration equipment is in the process of being replaced, and the control system and electric switch gear have been replaced in the last 10 years. Some of those needed to be replaced due to the location such as the switch gear which was outside in a saltwater environment and it is now inside a case. She summarized quite a few things have been replaced in the WWTP, but as things are replaced, other things fail. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO EXTEND TO 11:00. Council President Olson pointed out the council has a lot of business to conduct. There are five Tuesdays in May, but no one wants to work on a fifth Tuesday. She hoped the council could get some work done tonight. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO EXTEND UNTIL 10:30. AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Paine hoped the supply chain would start settling down. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 28 Packet Pg. 52 7.4.a Councilmember Chen asked if this was related to the flooding in January. Ms. Randolph answered no, the flooding was in the 400 building. Some equipment there is in the process of being replaced such as motors and a screening system. A lot of the WWTP equipment has a lifecycle of 10 or 15 years so there is always equipment being replaced. Councilmember Chen referred to the change order for installation that includes removal of the old belt. Ms. Randolph answered it includes removal of the old belt, disposal and installation. It needs to be installed in a short period of time which requires double shifts because the wastewater keeps coming into the WWTP while this work is being done. A lot of the cost is removal of the rags by hand which is a challenging endeavor. Councilmember Chen inquired about the contractor. Ms. Randolph answered the contractor through Ameresco will be utilized. Ameresco is the provider of Ecoremedy system for the carbon recovery project. The project requires putting in new screenings wash compactor and a new dumpster and that is what makes installation of this belt critical because the belt feeds into the wash compactor. They are already under contract with the carbon recovery project to do that work. It is designed to work with the new waster compactor. The screenings will have to be washed, compacted and bagged before they can go to the transfer station in the future. The carbon recovery will be tested on rags in the future and hopefully able to incorporate those in the future, but that will take some regulatory finesse. Student Representative Roberts asked if the amount paid by each plant partner was based on the percentage of ownership in the plant. Ms. Randolph answered yes. Council President Olson advised if the public knows anyone who is interested, the City is hiring for the WWTP. They are good union jobs with built in career progression and employees receive premium pay above the union scale. She encouraged the public to consider applying. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADDING NEW CHAPTER, CHAPTER 5.70 ENTITLED "UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY" TO CITY CODE Patricia Taraday, city attorney's office, advised the ordinance has been revised to include input from council at the last meeting and guidance from the council president. The ordinance makes it clear that it is unlawful for anyone to occupy or store personal property on public property overnight. The ordinance also sets forth protections for those who are homeless. Section 5.70.050 Enforcement speaks to those protections. The ordinance will not be enforced against homeless individuals when no available shelter is in place for that particular person. Homeless individuals will not be arrested for sleeping outside when there is no available shelter. The ordinance will only be enforced if available shelter is found, offered and subsequently refused. She had an opportunity to speak with some councilmembers this week and answer questions and she is here tonight to answer questions. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 5.70 ENTITLED UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY TO THE CITY CODE. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the statement, not enforceable when no shelter exists. If available shelter exists and found, it is required to be offered along with other available human services to the individual experiencing homelessness. Only if refused can it be enforced. She asked what that would look like; for example, if a call is made and the Everett Gospel mission says they have space, how is it ensured that once the individual is removed from the place they have chosen to be and transported to Everett, they actually get a bed? Ms. Taraday answered human services and the police chief will create standard Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 29 Packet Pg. 53 7.4.a operating procedures regarding how to document that available shelter exists, what that looks like for that particular person, how to facilitate transport, and how to ensure that it is available once they arrive. Councilmember L. Johnson recalled in a recent letter to the editor from the council president, she talked about serving on the homelessness force and that most actions focused on the underlying causes of homelessness, prevention and human services to help those in crisis and stated that the task force recommended a last resort tool for the rare cases when a person refused to move on from a public space, calling it a last resort measure for the most extreme circumstances. She referred to an example last summer of a woman who lost her housing in Edmonds and was sleeping on the Interurban Trail which is being used as justification for this ordinance. This challenging case took months of relationship building and understanding to find appropriate services to fit the individual's needs, but they did and it was a success story. If the individual had been forcibly removed without taking the time to understand her needs and to find appropriate services, the outcome may have been very different. The same may be true for the young man who was staying outside the library; last she heard he is now in a situation where he doing much better. Councilmember L. Johnson continued, these individuals are Edmonds residents, part of the community. There are housed individuals with issues that take months, sometimes years to resolve; don't our unhoused residents deserve the same dedication and care? In order to survive without a home, a person needs to sleep, eat, bathe, rest and seek shelter. Instead of sleeping and resting, people are often harassed, constantly moved, criminalized and pushed to new levels of exhaustion and poor health. The criminalization of homelessness only increases the burden on those who are unhoused, making the stress and struggle to survive even more difficult. This has been said over and over by experts; we need to meet people where they are. She agreed people should not be living unsheltered; it is not humane, but it is also not humane to ship someone off regardless of their actual need or, as was mentioned earlier, not actually offering shelter but offering a bus ticket out of town. Councilmember L. Johnson continued, the ordinance states it will not be enforced against persons if there isn't overnight shelter that can be utilized for that person. If shelter is available, the shelter space must be offered and only if it's refused. It doesn't state that the services must meet the individual's needs; understanding takes time. It also doesn't state how much time will be spent working with the individual. The task force is used as support for the ordinance; however, the task force stated the City should work to ensure shelter availability, property storage is available and resources are in place to enforce and adhere to the policies before considering no camping laws as required by federal law. They also listed as immediate action to evaluate and seek to establish a centralized care system in which first responders work in collaboration with City social workers to establish consistent care case management for clients. The City does not have a social worker so none of that has been done. The recommendations should be followed by first expanding shelter options in Edmonds and shelter availability. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO TABLE THIS UNTIL WE WORK ON THAT. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Paine asked when the police have contact with someone believe to be unhoused and who plans on staying overnight in a public place, what will that interaction and process look like. Police Chief Bennett answered most often what happens is they receive a call or if an officer is driving around and sees someone who has set up a tent or has shopping carts and appears unhoused, officers will stop and ask how they can help. Officers carry homeless care kits in their car with food, water, socks and other supplies because they want to be seen as a helping entity. The officer then contacts Mindy Woods, the human Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 30 Packet Pg. 54 7.4.a services manager. Once it is determined to be a safe place, human services staff come out to assess and offer services. She offered to provide examples of that occurring prior to development of this ordinance. Options can include motel vouchers, offering assistance via human services, etc. The police are often who gets called to try to get that person the services they need. That can happen over a period of days or weeks or as occurred last week, a period of months. She assumed the process would be the same with this ordinance. Police would make contact, ask if they can be of assistance, ask what they need, do a basic assessment, call human services and have them come out, offer services and transportation, call shelters or get voucher for shelter if the person desires shelter. All but maybe twice since her arrival in Edmonds, people absolutely refuse shelter, but most of the time they will take a motel voucher. Chief Bennett continued, in the small number of cases where services are offered and there is a shelter bed available or a motel voucher is offered and the person refuses and says they want to stay on public property, the police would say there is an ordinance that prohibits occupying public space for camping. At that point the person has the option to leave, it is not an immediate arrest. The person would be warned they are not allowed to occupy the space overnight and then they have a choice to go elsewhere, accept services, get on a bus or whatever they choose to do. It is not a situation of oh, you're unhoused, we're going to arrest you. The person is given the option for services and advised they are not allowed to camp overnight. It is all about first finding services to help. There are officers that started a slices and socks program, where they buy pizza and socks to give to people who are unhoused in the community. Many officers are advocates, trying to help people get the services they need. This is not intended to be punitive, it is trying to help people have a healthy space; it is unhealthy to sleep on the sidewalk. The goal is to get them every shred of help possible; arrest or charging would be the absolute last resort. Councilmember Paine recalled Edmonds officers recently received commendation for respectfully handling a situation with someone who was less than well wrapped. She noted it was important for the community to hear the steps the police would be taking. She asked how often officers have interactions with people who are unhoused. Chief Bennett commented it comes in spates, currently there have been a number of complaints near the Burlington Coat Factory, people camping there with tents. Officers have been out several times trying to gain assistance for those people. Then there might be a period of time where there are no encounters. Today there was an unhoused person who decided to lay down in the middle of the sidewalk near Swedish Hospital and refused to move. That call took a lot of resources and time to get the person the help they needed. It is call dependent, sometimes there might be a couple complaints in a week, sometimes there are none for a couple weeks. If the ordinance goes into effect, word travels fast regarding what is allowed/not allowed so there may be a decline in people trying to camp if they know they aren't allowed to do so in the City of Edmonds. Councilmember Chen thanked Ms. Taraday for spending time talking with him today and the follow-up email on his proposed amendment. He was okay with some of the proposal, but he had an important amendment to add. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO INSERT A NEW SECTION 2 IN THE ORDINANCE TITLED, DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION, THAT READS, THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY ORDINANCE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ANY INDIVIDUALS WHO OCCUPY PUBLIC PROPERTIES UNLAWFULLY. THE OFFER OF ASSISTANCE INCLUDING FOOD, MEDICAL CARE, AVAILABLE SHELTER AND NOTIFYING FAMILY SHALL BE DOCUMENTED. Councilmember Chen recognized the issue of homelessness is very complex and the community wants to protect not only the housed, but also the unhoused. Adding this amendment ensures assistance including food, shelter, medical care, notifying family is documented. He was born and raised in the eastern culture of China where family is a strong bond and 4-5 generations live under one roof taking care of each other. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 31 Packet Pg. 55 7.4.a There is talk about family as a definition, but families need to take care of each other and support each other. In this culture, animals are treated like family, not to mention siblings, parents, etc. He purposefully inserted notifying family into the amendment to ensure that help is documented and empty promises are not offered but truly helping people who don't have a place to stay and give them a place to shower, rest their head, get medical help, whatever they need. That is why the City plans to have a social worker work with the police. Edmonds does not have a lot of available resources, housing is very expensive and out of reach to many, and there is no available shelter. Council President Olson asked the city attorney and police chief to comment on how this would relate in practice. Ms. Taraday answered the law requires offering available shelter. This ordinance goes above and beyond by offering human services. The way it is written now, the standard operating procedures would provide for documenting the offer of available shelter and human services and it does not incorporate any documentation procedures for medical services or notifying family. She suggested Deputy Director Burley or Chief Bennett speak to practical issues related to documenting those services and potentially notifying family. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND TO 11:00. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN AND TIBBOTT VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO EXTEND TO 10:45. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Deputy Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Shannon Burley advised medical services would be provided by paramedics, not by police or human services. Of course, if they entered into a crisis, they would do their best, but the paramedics would provide medical services. As such neither human services nor the police department should be codified as offering medial services. With regard to notifying family, that is an incredibly compassionate suggestion, one that would make sense to try to do. There could not be a guarantee that they would get in touch with family members. Often when they are communicating with individuals, the first steps is to ask if they will accept a cell phone so staff can begin to communicate with an individual and build trust in a way to better understand the challenges they are facing and be able to provide adequate services. There are programs that provide donated cell phones. Councilmember Chen said nothing is guaranteed, but we need to try, and to deliver the effort. With regard to implementation, Ms. Taraday said the way the proposed ordinance is written, both sections 030 and 040 make it clear that it applies to any person and enforcement is only suspended when there is no available shelter. The implementation referring to any person is not necessary as it is already mentioned in 030 and 040. Council President Olson said she has had a lot of conversation about implementation. Staff is amazing and totally has their hearts in the right place. It would be great to include attempting to notify family in the implementation plan, but she did not feel it needed to be in the ordinance although she appreciated the sentiment behind it. The part about food and available shelter is more within the purview of the police and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 32 Packet Pg. 56 7.4.a is already their standard practice. She recommended taking out reference to medical care and notifying family from the proposed amendment. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO DELETE MEDICAL CARE AND NOTIFY FAMILY AND HANDLE THAT IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN INSTEAD. Councilmember Tibbott spoke in favor of the amendment. Notifying family could be problematic, the family of origin could be dangerous to a person, the source of addiction, and/or completely undesirable. It should be up to the professionals to make that contact if it is deemed beneficial. In response to Council President Olson's comment, Councilmember Chen said medical care is very critical when dealing with some of the unhoused population due to their medical needs. He understood the City was not in the position to provide for medical needs, but they could refer it. There needs to be an effort for social workers to connect the needs to different professions. If they need shelter, provide shelter; the City does not provide shelter, staff provides a motel voucher, they don't drive bus, but call Uber or buy plane tickets. The same for medical services, the intent is to refer the person to the provider. With regard to notifying families, he asked if the family does not take care of those people, who else will. Those are their loves ones. Council President Olson restated the amendment: REMOVE REFERENCE TO MEDICAL AND CALLING THE FAMILY AND INSTEAD HAVE THAT IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AS APPROPRIATE. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Council President Olson restated the amendment: ADD SECTION 2, DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION, THAT READS, THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY ORDINANCE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ANY INDIVIDUALS WHO OCCUPY PUBLIC PROPERTIES ILLEGALLY. THE OFFER OF ASSISTANCE INCLUDING FOOD AND AVAILABLE SHELTER SHALL BE DOCUMENTED. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. During the above vote, Councilmember Chen asked for clarification, if this motion fails, does it goes back to his original amendment. Mr. Taraday advised Councilmember Chen's amendment was amended as proposed by Council President Olson. If this vote fails, it returns to the language in the packet. Councilmember Buckshnis asked Ms. Burley and Chief Bennett if they had the staffing available as there needs to be a pragmatic, comprehensive plan in place that includes staff. Some people think the police will spend all their time taking care of this and not doing police work even though this is partially police work. Chief Bennett answered this is part of the regular duties the police perform. This is another tool for offering assistance. She did not see a staffing issue in daily patrol. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there was human service staffing available. Ms. Burley answered this is what human services does, what isn't available is shelter. She did not want to mislead anyone to believe by passing this ordinance people could immediately be put into shelter. The timeline to secure shelter varies by each individual and it will take time. If she called right now, there are no congregate shelter Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 33 Packet Pg. 57 7.4.a beds available anywhere close. It will take time; passing this ordinance does not mean that anyone camping in Edmonds will be swept off the streets. Staff will continue to provide compassion, gain trust and do their best to secure shelter for individuals who often don't decline it once it is found. As Chief Bennett said the hiring of a social worker is getting closer which would expand staffing. Between the human services manager and social worker, she believed they would be able to coordinate services but cannot respond 24/7. Councilmember L. Johnson reiterated there is no shelter and there are limited hotel vouchers. Hotel vouchers are not a City -funded program, it is a temporary grant from the Department of Commerce, tied directly to the pandemic. Actions speak louder than words. In the last two years, there have been multiple attempts to defend human services including in 2020 with CARES funding, Council President Olson supported only dispersing funds to businesses versus low income residents and three councilmembers supported reducing the housing and supplemental relief fund from $300,000 to $100,000. In 2021 budget deliberations, three councilmembers voted to defend human services by half. In 2022 during the budget redo, two councilmembers proposed removing 1/3 or $200,000 from human services. During last week's meeting, Councilmember Buckshnis stated I do believe we should in fact provide an ordinance that allows people, normal people like myself, to have a right that if someone starts camping in my driveway, I have a right to call Chief Bennett and have the police check on what's going on. The use of normal would seem to indicate that those struggling are not normal which is both offensive and discriminatory. It is reminiscent of the so-called ugly laws that existed prior to the 1970s which made it illegal for unsightly people to be in public view. This ordinance says if you lose your access to shelter in Edmonds, the normal people should not have to witness... Mayor Nelson interrupted, stating it was 10:45 p.m. and the council needed to consider whether to extend the meeting. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO EXTEND TO 11:00. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, PAINE, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN AND TIBBOTT VOTING NO. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO CONTINUE THE MEETING ON THURSDAY. 5. SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS AND AMENDMENTS TO ECC TITLE 4 LICENSES 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS 12. ADJOURN The Council meeting was adjourned at 10:46 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 34 Packet Pg. 58 7.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 05-03-2022 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 59 7.5.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES May 3, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:03 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. COUNCIL BUSINESS RESOLUTION ADOPTING COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE Council President Olson explained this was first introduced by City Clerk Scott Passey who worked for the City of Shoreline before coming to Edmonds and felt their rules of procedure had been helpful to the process. Additionally, the parliamentarian who has provided training to the council in the past, Ann Macfarlane, says there is value to having additional rules above and beyond Robert's Rules of Order which only focus on the meeting itself. The rules of procedure have been reviewed by a council committee in the past, the last time was September 21, 2021. She invited councilmembers to ask questions after which she would read each section followed by questions, comments, or amendments. There were no questions. Section 1. Authori , , Paragraphs 1.1, 1.2 1.3 No questions/comments. Section 2 Council Organization • 2.1 (swearing in councilmembers) • 2.2 (election of council president and council president pro tem) Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out there was no reference to the unspoken rule that councilmembers planning to run for office cannot be council president. She recalled a certain councilmember had to be appointed because they were the only one not running for office and even through some councilmembers did not necessarily want that person as council president. There is also no reference to the situation when someone is leaving the council; she recalled two situations where councilmembers left and the decision Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 60 7.5.a was left to the mayor due to a tie. She asked whether the intent was to have issues such as that addressed tonight, or to have councilmembers develop amended language. Council President Olson answered it may be more expedient to put amendments in writing so they can be displayed when this topic returns to council. She suggested councilmembers submit suggestions to the council assistants. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not believe a councilmember should not be prevented from serving as council president just because they were retiring or running for office. If they feel capable of serving as council president and have the trust of other councilmembers, it should be allowed and there should not be an unspoken rule to that effect. Councilmember Paine commented she would like to be able to read an amendment before she votes on it. It is a best practice and cleaner for citizens not to have a council president who is running for office that year. It makes it more difficult to discern what is election behavior versus council president behavior. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to unspoken rules, pointing out the point of rules of procedure is to identify the procedures the council is agreeing to operate by. She did not see the need to address unspoken rules. She found it confusing to bring up unspoken rules instead of speaking directly to the document. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was just bringing up examples from the past 12 years. She was aware of two examples where the mayor selected the council president which was not the will of council. She was also aware of two councilmembers who wanted to be considered for council president but were told they couldn't because one was running for election and the other was retiring. Sometimes it is helpful to understand what has happened in the past in order to address rules for the future. Council President Olson said bringing up those things may be helpful in deciding what should be included in the rules. She believed not allowing someone who was running for office to serve as council president was a good idea and if they ended up getting elected as council president before they made that decision, they could be replaced via another council election. She did not see a reason to exclude councilmembers who were retiring from serving as council president. She agreed the tie should not be broken by the mayor, it should be a vote of the council and some compromises would need to be made by the council as a body. She expressed support for that rule. She explained the intent was to take feedback on the rules; councilmembers could prepare the amended language or submit their suggestion to the council assistants and slides would be prepared for council review. Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for allowing councilmembers who are retiring to be considered for council president. From a political angle, it makes sense that councilmembers running for office should not be considered for council president. He expressed strong encouragement to have the council assistants draft that amendment and bring it to council at a future meeting. Councilmember K. Johnson said she submitted eight amendments regarding the rules of procedure to Mr. Passey today. She asked if she should make comments during the presentation or wait until the meeting when slides were prepared of all the amendments. Mayor Nelson suggested she raise the issue when it was relevant to the subject. Councilmember K. Johnson said no councilmembers should be council president two years in a row and she had a proposed amendment with that language. She also suggested it would be helpful to take longevity into account when selecting council presidents. Council President Olson relayed it was decided instead of making amendments today, amendments would be put in writing on a slide. She has written down Councilmember K. Johnson's comments and will have a slide prepared for council action. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 61 7.5.a Councilmember Buckshnis asked Councilmember K. Johnson what she defined as longevity, whether it was 2 or 3 years, noting it was difficult to define longevity when councilmembers have 4 year terms. Mayor Nelson requested councilmembers address the body and not specific councilmember. Councilmember K. Johnson said she would define longevity as number of years as a councilmember. • 2.3 Duties of Officers o A. (presiding officer) Council President Olson pointed out under state law, the mayor is the presiding officer. o B. (duties of presiding officer) Councilmember L. Johnson suggested the rules also state the presiding officer adjourns the meeting. Regarding duty #4 (state each motion before it is voted upon), Councilmember Tibbott commented the motion is often not restated before it is voted on. In general that is a good practice but is not always done. He asked whether the council wanted that to be optional or a requirement. His preference would be to follow this rule. Councilmember Paine expressed appreciation for the suggestion and agreed the best practice would be to restate motion, however, sometimes the motion is somewhat garbled. She suggested the councilmember who made the motion restate it so their intent is clear rather than getting locked up in an interpretation loop. Council President Olson the intent of the rules was what councilmembers think the council should be doing and what they want to have as guidelines; it does not necessarily reflect what the council is doing now. o C. (questions of order) • 2.4 Appointments to Boards and Committees Council President Olson questioned whether circulating the final appointment list to the council at least seven days prior to appointment was practical based on the election of the council president at the first Tuesday in January and councilmembers are expected to attend meetings that month. Councilmember Paine said last year she surveyed councilmembers asking for feedback and gave the list to the incoming council president. She felt circulating the final appointments seven days prior to appointment would not always be a problem. Councilmember Buckshnis said the legislative assistant used to send out the list to councilmembers and the council president would make the committee assignments the night they were elected. She was unsure a timeframe needed to be included in the rules. It does not necessarily need to be a task for the council president and could be delegated to the council assistants. However, when there are new councilmembers, there should be an opportunity for them to understand the committees before making a selection. Councilmember Chen suggested 14 days. He recalled during the last election, there was also a transition in the council assistant. Council President Olson asked if the seven days was just to circulate information or give councilmembers seven days' notice after the assignments are made. She requested councilmembers with further information reach out to her. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 62 7.5.a • 2.5 Filling a Council Vacancy o A. (procedures in RCW) o B. (application form) Councilmember Paine suggested including a draft application in the rules of procedures. o C. (interviews) o D. (executive session to discuss qualifications) o E. (term of appointed councilmember) Section 3. Agenda Preparation • 3.1 (preparation of meeting agenda) • 3.2 (placing items on agenda) Council President Olson offered an amendment, instead of a majority vote, a vote of 3 or more councilmembers and also changing the majority vote in the last paragraph. Her rationale was three councilmembers wanting to talk about something should be enough to have it heard. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out in the past, she was able to work with the council president to get something on the agenda and she did not think a majority should be required to have something on the agenda. Council President Olson commented that was addressed in 3.2.13, if the council president agrees, something can be placed on the agenda which is how it has worked this year. In the case when the council president does not think something is a good idea, does not want to put it on the agenda, there should be some recourse for a significant minority to say they want to talk about something. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested on issues that the council president does not deem necessary to place on the agenda, an item could be put on the agenda via a vote. She recalled many instances in recent years where items were not added to the agenda because there were not four votes. Councilmember Paine asked if this would be a departure from Robert's Rules. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said it probably would be. It is one thing to have an item added to the agenda in advance of a meeting, but if a majority of the council does not want to talk about that item, it can be tabled. At the end of the day, the majority will always control the agenda. An item might be on agenda for the public to see, but it may not get more than 10 seconds of discussion if the majority does not want to talk about it. Councilmember K. Johnson said that would be a way for the majority to rule, but she objected to the fact that she had agenda items prepared and ready to go, asked for them to be put on the agenda, and it was not done, to the point where they became irrelevant. That has been the practice during the two previous years, but prior to that, she was always able to get something on agenda. There is too much power with the council president deciding whether or not a councilmember's agenda memo is appropriate for the meeting. She wanted something in the rules of procedures that acknowledges the ability for a councilmember to get an item on the agenda and it could be tabled if the majority did not want to discuss it. • 3.3 (agenda memos) • 3.4 (agenda item prioritization) • 3.5 (ordinances readings) o A. (first reading) o B. (second reading) Councilmember Buckshnis commented the three touch rule has been discussed by council often. She suggested there be exceptions to that rule, instances where an item does not require three touches. The first reading, publication on the extended agenda, is not actual a reading. She recalled instances in the past where only the PLN number was listed on the extended agenda so people did not know what the item was Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 63 7.5.a about. She suggested land use items listed on the extended agenda include more than the file number and include the topic such as the tree code. Having an item on the extended agenda is actually notification, not first reading and first reading occurs at either committee or at council. She suggested revising this section because it is not really a three touch rule; it is notification, committee and then council. Council President Olson suggested it may not be three readings, but it is three touches. She offered to assist with revising the language of this section. Councilmember Tibbott asked if it would be possible to have the extended agenda included at the end of the packet. He recalled that was done when he was on the planning board so board members knew what was coming up. It would serve as notification for the public as well as the council. Council President Olson advised the extended agenda is available on the website and asked if he preferred to have it as part of the council packet each week. Councilmember Tibbott suggested notification would be more accessible that way and it could eliminate the possibility that people are not aware of upcoming agenda items. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled when there were paper packets, the extended agenda was included as part of the packet and some council presidents even included when councilmembers would be on vacation. She agreed it was important to have the extended agenda as part the of packet so councilmembers do not have to search for it on the website. Councilmember Paine expressed support for having the extended appended to the back of the electronic packet or printed for those who receive paper packets, with the recognition that the extended agenda is a snapshot in time on the Friday it is included with the packet. o C. (third reading) Section 4. Consent Agenda • 4.1 (placing items on consent agenda) Councilmember Paine commented if committees are used effectively, all the low hanging fruit items go to committees and then to the consent agenda. She suggested adding that one of the council touches can be at council committee. Consent agendas can be used very effectively, be great time savers, and help meetings flow smoothly. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not like the first sentence as all items that go to committee then go to the consent agenda, full council or back to committee for further discussion. She suggested including the fact that consent agenda items are often referred by committee. • 4.2 (adoption of consent agenda) • 4.3 (removing items from consent agenda) Councilmember Buckshnis commented pulling something from the consent agenda and moving it to a future agenda would be a council decision, not the mayor's decision. 3. INTERVIEW FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD/COMMISSION Mayor Nelson said he recommended Mr. Toretta for appointment to the sister city commission. Councilmembers interviewed Colin Toretta for appointment to the sister city commission position #11 (responses in italics). Council President Olson welcomed Mr. Toretta and invited him to describe his interest in the sister city commission. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 64 7.5.a My wife and I have lived in Edmonds for nine years. We were both born and raised in Washington and have fallen in love with Edmonds. Last year I started thinking about ways to get more involved with the community and happened to run into Mayor Nelson at a ribbon cutting and asked his advice. He mentioned Edmonds has a number of citizen boards and encouraged me to see if anything interested me. I looked at the options, and as exciting as the cemetery board sounds, the sister city commission sounded more up my alley, both from my personal interest and work experience. I think I can add value to the board. Councilmember Paine commented it sounded like he had great experience and asked if he spoke Japanese. No, but this could finally give me good justification to learn. Councilmember Tibbott commented this is a fun committee. Although he has not been on the committee himself, he has participated in the social events. He asked Mr. Toretta if he had participated in any of the social events in the past. Not with the sister city commission. It wasn't until I looked at the boards that I realized Edmonds had a sister city program. I was fascinated by sister city program in Spokane where I grew up which was also a Japanese town. Councilmember Tibbott asked if he would have time available to participate in social events when the Hekinan delegations visit Edmonds. Absolutely. This is what I'm looking for, an opportunity, a way to spend time with the community, give back to Edmonds and what better way than to introduce people from another country and culture to all the cools things in Edmonds and Washington. Councilmember K. Johnson said she has participated in some of the activities, both with adult and student delegations. The student delegations are very exciting because the kids have so much energy. She asked what prompted his lifelong interest in Japan. Part of it is Spokane's sister city program and growing up in 1980s, that was about as much multi -culture I was exposed to. My father was art an major at Gonzaga and infused a love of art in his children from an early age including Japanese artists such as Hokusi's crashing wave painting. I became interested in other aspects of Japanese artistry such the artist who turned graphic design for video games and anime into world class art. More recently my wife and I had an opportunity see Yayoi Kusama's traveling exhibit at the Seattle Art Museum who does amazing things with perspective, shape and emotions. I cannot say for sure what caused that to resonate so much for me, but it has definitely something that interested me from an early age. Councilmember K. Johnson commented it was interesting that the arts communicated cultural diversity to him in such a way. I believe in the power of art to connect people of different cultures. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to his application which states he was always fascinated with Spokane's sister city and asked him to expand on how the program connected two different cultures. In a place like Spokane in the 1980s, there weren't a lot of ways to get exposure to other cultures. The sister city programs offered a way for people pre-internet to understand how big and different the world is, provide an opportunity for student and adult exchanges, and make it more real and tangible and less theoretical. Councilmember Buckshnis commented this is a really fun committee. She recalled one year when the adult delegation made beer and another time there was a Halloween party. It is really a multicultural experience. His job as director of program management for Oracle is a perfect position for him because he collaborates with many people. Councilmember Chen thanked him for devoting his energy to this fun commission. He asked his thoughts about Mt. Fuji versus Mt. Rainier, which one is more attractive. Mt. Fuji has definitely had a larger impact on art and culture than Mt. Rainer, although I've only seen one of them firsthand. I have definitely Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 65 appreciated Rainier, but would like to have an opportunity go to Japan and see such a storied mountain that has featured so prominently in so many aspects of Japanese culture, from movies to art, video games, TV shows and everything in between. Council President Olson advised confirmation is on the consent agenda; once it is approved, his appointment will be approved. 4. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 3, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 66 7.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of May 5, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 05-05-2022 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 67 7.6.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING — VIRTUAL/ONLINE MINUTES May 5, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Vivian Olson, Mayor Pro Tern Michelle Bennett, Police Chief Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tern Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., Cultural Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Arts & Human Services Director Will Chen, Councilmember Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Patricia Taraday, City Attorney's Office Councilmember Scott Passey, City Clerk Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Mike Nelson, Mayor 1. CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 8:02 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Olson. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. A11 elected officials were present, participating remotely, with the exception of Mayor Nelson. 3. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADDING NEW CHAPTER, CHAPTER 5.70 ENTITLED "UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY" TO CITY CODE Patricia Taraday, city attorney's office, advised tonight is continued discussion from the last council meeting. An updated ordinance was circulated that included the amendments voted on at the last meeting. She was happy to answer any questions. Councilmember Paine began to make an amendment. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis raised a point of order, whether the main motion was already on the table. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said this is not an adjourned meeting, it is a special meeting. If it was an adjourned meeting, the motion would already be on the table, but since it is a special meeting, the motion is not on the table. To make things smooth and straightforward, he recommended the council agree to continue where they left off which was a motion to adopt the pending ordinance and that motion had been amended by a motion made by Councilmember Chen which was further amended by Mayor Pro Tern Olson. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 68 7.6.a If the council wants to start where it left off on Tuesday, it would be with that amended version. That would require a consensus of the council as this is a special meeting, not a continuation of the last session. MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS, TO CONTINUE FROM WHERE WE HAD BEEN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON, TO AMEND CHAPTER 5.70.020 DEFINITIONS, AFTER THE WORD "CHARGE" ADD "MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN A 35 MILE RADIUS WITH THE STARTING POINT OF EDMONDS CITY HALL." Councilmember Paine explained the reason she was asking for this change was to have a smaller service radius. Including a geographical limitation and looking at the available overnight shelter will benefit individuals by keeping them near the resources they know and allow them to maintain relationship with nearby services and friendships. It also helps the human services program focus on local resources rather than chasing down far-flung overnight shelters from across the state. Councilmember Tibbott said he agreed with this the amendment in principle and appreciated the reasons that were identified. His one concern was someone may prefer another location. For example, someone who moved here from Yakima and wanted to move closer to family or friends. There should be an exception for someone who has a preference to move outside the 35 mile radius. Councilmember Paine said she did not see this as being restrictive when there were extenuating circumstances. This is related to the search for overnight shelter. If shelter was identified outside the purposes of this ordinance, that could occur. For purposes of the ordinance, she wanted to keep it focused to allow resources to be well managed and also serve the individual in a way that's most helpful. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the attorneys understood the amendment that way, applying only to the search radius for the City and not for extenuating circumstances. Ms. Taraday said the way she interpreted the amendment to the definition of available overnight shelter would mean the geographic area that could be considered as available before some is cited for a crime would be within the area cited. Shelter could be arranged for someone outside that geographical radius and she did not see that as a limiting factor. Councilmember Paine restated the amendment: CHANGE SECTION 5.70.020 DEFINITIONS, AFTER "CHARGE" ADD "MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN A 35 MILE RADIUS WITH A STARTING POINT OF EDMONDS CITY HALL". AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to an email received today from the Edmonds diversity commission stating they would like to go on record opposing the unlawful occupation of public property ordinance that would criminalize homelessness if unhoused people declined services and will also disproportionately affect and hurt GLBTQ+ and people of color. Instead of criminalizing the unhoused, we suggest the City of Edmonds create services and infrastructure to assist those in need. The council also received letters from multiple elected officials in neighboring jurisdictions as well as state representatives imploring the council to remain a partner in addressing this crisis and not shift the burden onto neighboring cities. The council has also received a lot of input from citizens. She asked Deputy Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Shannon Burley and Police Chief Michelle Bennett what is the urgency, is this an emergency and is it necessary to pass it tonight or does the council have time to slow down and take into consideration input from advisory committees and what other electeds and experts are saying, that this doesn't resolve homelessness, that services need to be in place. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 69 7.6.a Chief Bennett answered anytime someone is unhoused and does not have the proper care especially in weather like this, for her and her staff, they consider it emergent to get someone the care they need whether it is medical, shelter, warm clothing or social services. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if this ordinance specifically was an emergency. Chief Bennett answered the ordinance gives them more ability to contact people. They currently contact people, offer them services, and take them to services and this ordinance provides a bit of a push if they do not want to accept services, they can be advised that public property is not somewhere they can stay which helps propel people into services they probably desperately need. Chief Bennett continued, in the last couple weeks, there have been a couple complaints, generally community members who see things and are upset. However, anyone driving on Highway 99 will see a number encampments, tents or other signs of people experiencing being unhoused; those are the people they really want to help. Ms. Burley agreed, stating from a human services perspective, they are trying to find shelter as quickly as possible for every person referred to them. With or without an ordinance, that is what they do. Councilmember L. Johnson asked what the $1000 and 90 days were based on. Ms. Taraday answered the $1000 and 90 days are the maximum penalty for any misdemeanor. This is a misdemeanor crime and the maximum penalty the court could impose would be a $1000 fine or 90 days in jail. As written in the ordinance, the first offense carries no mandatory penalty, the second offense has a mandatory penalty of $100 fine and 1 day in jail and the third offense also has a mandatory penalty. However, the ordinance states monetary penalties will be waived for those unable to pay. In that case, the court is asked to provide an opportunity for community service or work crew in lieu of a monetary penalty. Councilmember L. Johnson commented these are individuals who cannot afford shelter and the proposal is to start with the maximum for a first offense. She realized it was up to the maximum. If a person had $1000, they likely wouldn't be sleeping out in the open. For an individual who is struggling, $50 is probably an insurmountable amount. Ms. Taraday answered the language in the ordinance is the statutory language regarding the definition of what constitutes a misdemeanor. In no way would it imply that a fine of $1000 would be imposed for the first offense. Paragraph 4 states if the person is unable to pay, the court is urged to waive the monetary penalty, understanding the circumstance that Councilmember L. Johnson outlined. Councilmember L. Johnson asked why the first offense would be a misdemeanor and were there other options. Chief Bennett answered without it being a misdemeanor, the only option would be to cite and citing would only be monetary so it has no teeth, just giving a person a piece of paper and walking away. Councilmember L. Johnson asked if the council as the legislative body had the discretion to start with a lower amount. Chief Bennett asked if she meant the fine when it went to court or it initially not being a misdemeanor. Councilmember L. Johnson answered either; if it went to court, could the council specify a different amount for the first offense in the ordinance. Ms. Taraday answered the council could mandate a certain amount for the first offense, recalling there was consideration of $50. If a minimum fine is included, that fine would apply to anyone that was unlawfully occupying public property, not just someone who is unhoused. Councilmember L. Johnson asked what is the point of this; it seems like a way to justify $1000 when this is clearly targeted at those who are unhoused, that cannot be sugarcoated. She compared it to a parent making punishment appropriate, stating a $1000 for someone who does not have shelter is so far out of appropriate. Ms. Taraday answered the council could make the first offense a mandatory $25, that is a legislative decision the council could create with an amendment. Chief Bennett said for people who are unhoused and do not have money, it could be the court's decision upon discretion not to impose any monetary fee. Mandating a certain dollar amount takes away the discretion to not impose any fee. She could not imagine the current judge imposing a fee for the first offense. The statutory language is up to $1000, that is rarely imposed even for theft or assault cases. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 70 7.6.a Councilmember L. Johnson agreed with Chief Bennett with regard to the current judicial branch, but this is an ordinance the City is putting its name on. While Chief Bennett and the judge are in place now, that could change. She did not want to impose a minimum and wanted the maximum lowered. She was happy with zero but did not think $1000 was in any way, shape or form appropriate. There are so many loopholes in this because it is related to services and what constitutes adequate shelter for each individual so it is ripe for abuse. That is not an attack or judging the police department or human services; this is legislation that will be in place going forward. She did not support doing this to begin with. Mayor Pro Tem Olson advised Councilmember L. Johnson was approaching 15 minutes of commentary and suggested she finish in the next two minutes and make a motion if she wished. Councilmember L. Johnson reiterated she did not support this ordinance, but given she is here and has an opportunity to reduce the fine, she made the following amendment: COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, THAT THE MAXIMUM ON THE FIRST OFFENSE WOULD BE $25. Councilmember L. Johnson said the council is talking about those among us that have the least; if you don't have housing, what do you have and a fine of $25 is still extremely punitive. Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis did not support the amendment, commenting in reading 5.70, the entire amount can be waived. This puts a dollar amount on it; an individual may not even have $25. Specifying a dollar amount eliminates the leeway to change it. Councilmember Tibbott did not support the amendment, agreeing with the points Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis made. There are also some legal reasons for retaining the $1000 amount that is assigned to other misdemeanors and a lower amount would create another category. Councilmember Paine expressed support for the amendment, noting the goal of reducing the fine was obvious. Imposing a $1000 fine creates a huge burden; the person is unhoused and struggling and is already in poverty and it makes life that much more difficult for them by accumulating more criminal history. The unfairness of this because the individual is poor and unhoused are status crimes that only apply to people who do not have a place to live, who are trying to get shelter when they are in a situation they probably don't want to be in and are having a difficult time finding a way out of it. Having a fine over $25 makes it more difficult for a person to make the strides they need for self-sufficiency. She supported a maximum $25 fine. Ms. Taraday clarified the $1000 fine is the maximum fine that would be imposed as a category of a misdemeanor, the fine could be zero or up to $1000. The way the amendment is proposed is up to $25, it could be zero, but not more than $25. Councilmember K. Johnson did not support the amendment language because she felt the language as written was appropriate and it will be up to the municipal judge to make the determination regarding the amount the plaintiff needs to pay. She believed it was structured in an appropriate manner and she was ready to ready to vote no on the amendment and to support the main motion. Councilmember Chen agreed the monetary amount is up to the maximum and the municipal court judge will make that determination. He summarized the existing language was appropriate. Mayor Pro Tem Olson commented there was one case recently where $30,000 was found on someone who was unhoused. It is not an automatic assumption, and as staff has repeatedly said, it is not one size fits all, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 71 7.6.a so leaving it in the court's hands to make that assessment is appropriate because only they will know all the circumstances that were found by the first responders. Councilmember L. Johnson restated the amendment: TO REDUCE THE FIRST OFFENSE TO BE A MAXIMUM OF UP TO $25. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Chen referred to 5.70.060 Rules, which states, The chief of police is hereby authorized to adopt rules, regulations, administrative policies, and procedures for implementing the provisions of this chapter. He asked what rules would be used to implement this policy. Chief Bennett answered most often what happens is, 1) the police are dispatched when there is a complaint, worry or request for a welfare check for a person on the sidewalk that is in crisis, or 2) the police are driving around (on -view or self - initiated activity) and see tents, shopping carts, bags, etc. In either situation, the police offer services and contact human services to inform Ms. Burley or Ms. Woods there is someone in crisis, provide descriptors and their location, and then either Ms. Burley, Ms. Woods or once a social worker is hired, will come out and do an assessment once it is determined it is a safe place for them to be, There are myriad other options with Compass Health, Swedish Edmonds Hospital and Snohomish County crisis teams, etc. Chief Bennett continued, here are a lot of different entities who can provide assistance. The police department's procedure would be to first contact human services and attempt to get the person the help they need. The next thing would be to offer shelter if the person is willing which is something the police do now. If there is no available shelter, many times the person is offered a motel voucher. She clarified the police department's process is not, oh you have a tent and are camping, you're under arrest. The only time camping on public property would become arrestable under this ordinance is if services are available and they are offered and the person does not want them and are told the City has an ordinance that does not allow camping on public property. They would need to either pack up their things and find another place, or they could accept shelter. Many times when she worked in the Shoreline area, the person would get on a bus to Seattle or elsewhere. It is not an automatic arrest just because the person is unhoused. The only part of the ordinance that is enforceable is if they are offered shelter, refuse it and then refuse to leave. Ms. Burley said in addition to what Chief Bennett said, this ordinance requires property storage. While the current property storage facilities or procedures could be identified, those may change; property storage may need to be larger, smaller, etc. This is why it was important to leave some of the implementation and operational details in the hands of the police chief instead of codifying them. Once they are in the ordinance, for example, if a specific location for property storage was identified, the ordinance would need to be amended if the location changed. Chief Bennett said the rules related to property storage could change due to state law. Property storage is only necessary if a person refuses to leave, won't accept services and they are arrested. It would be important for the person's dignity to store the person's belonging safely so they can retrieve them. Councilmember Chen asked how long it would take for the police department or human services department to develop documented procedures. Chief Bennett answered it can be difficult to have a standard operating procedure (SOP) because every situation is a little different. As much as she would like to say there is a script and an exact way things would be done, it will depend on the circumstances. Their general guidance now would not change; the first thing they try to do is gain assistance for the person and contact human services. That is always the first step unless a crime is already happening, there has been an assault, the person is out of touch with reality or threatening harm to themselves in which case it is an ITA. It varies depending on what is happening with the individual. Without a crime or the person needing medical or imminent mental health treatment, their standard procedure now is to call human services to do an Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 72 7.6.a assessment if they are available. If human services are not available such as at night, officers try to do a referral. Councilmember Chen said he was not interested in details regarding storage but rather a general guidance procedure. He asked if that would take one or two weeks to develop that documentation. Mayor Pro Tern Olson asked if the Public Safety, Planning and Personnel (PSPP) committee could review the implementation plan when it is developed. Chief Bennett answered it would be difficult to encapsulate what will happen with each event. If this ordinance passes, what is mostly like to happen is she will put out a general order to the staff saying this ordinance is now in effect, as you make contact, contact human services, procedures for property if there is an arrest, etc. It would outline as a general order how the ordinance will work. She was hesitant to get into too many specifics because she did not want to box officers into anything when things vary so greatly. Councilmember Chen said that leaves uncertainty regarding the implementation because each officer would handle things differently. Chief Bennett said she would be happy to have council see the general order, but if she wrote procedures saying contact human services, human services comes out to do an assessment and offer housing, they may encounter a person that is in a mental crisis that requires an ITA which would require straying from the SOP. The general order needs to be broad enough for the various types of things that can happen. Another situation could be that a person is unhoused and there has been a theft or a third drug possession or other criminal activity, so that would not follow a standard SOP because the first thing would be to make an arrest due to criminal activity. She summarized there are a lot of different variable and factors, but as a general guideline, the general order to the officers will say minus a criminal complaint or an ITA, contact human services, offer shelter, how to handle property if an arrest is made, etc. She will provide general guidance but there has to be room for dynamic situations that can change quickly. Mayor Pro Tem Olson advised Councilmember Chen his questions/comments were approaching 15 minutes. If he had a motion, it should be made and if he had further questions, she will circle back to him. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR OUR CHIEF OF POLICE TO COME UP WITH A GENERAL GUIDANCE FOR PROCEDURES AND IMPLEMENTATIONS. Councilmember Chen commented this is dealing with homeless people and putting those people into custody and facing fines so this policy impacts people's lives. He wanted to at least have general guidance regarding implementation so officers on duty have rules and procedures to follow, otherwise each officer will approach the situation differently. Given the situation, he would feel more comfortable if he had an opportunity to see those procedures. Mr. Taraday explained a lot of what the chief described are administrative details that the police chief and the police department will work out. To the extend the council wants to provide policy guidance, it certainly can but he believed what the chief described sounded like administrative details that are generally left to the administration to work through. If the motion was asking for an informational report from the chief regarding the rules that were developed and how they would be implemented, that is entirely appropriate. He asked whether the motion was seeking an informational report from the chief or whether it was to have the council approve the rules. Councilmember Chen said attaching information to the ordinance supporting the rules would also work. He wanted to know the guidance and procedures. He recall last Tuesday he proposed offers of shelter be documented because he did not want the City offering empty promises and just drive people out. He was happy with Councilmember Paine's amendment limiting the radius to 35 miles from City Hall to ensure the City was not just driving people out and was sincere about providing help to people in crisis. This is another Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 73 7.6.a way to know that officers have a roadmap to follow. He suggested the police chief prepare that documentation and have it as an attachment to the ordinance. Councilmember Tibbott said what he heard described by Chief Bennett was the way the police department operates. They are trained professional; if the council adds SOPS to the ordinance, there will be hundreds of other ordinances where SOPS could be requested. He preferred to keep the ordinance the way it is and let the police department do their work. If need oversight or a report needs to be requested, that could be done later and does not need to be part of ordinance. He did not support the amendment. Councilmember Paine said she was very familiar with how rule making goes due to her past experience; rulemaking has always been the purview of the administration who put things into operation. Typically it is a courtesy, it's helpful for the policy makers to know there are good rule making steps in place, but it is up to the administration to make those rules and ensure they are workable. With regard to the checklist Chief Bennett listed, she asked what happened if halfway through someone being onery and picked up, they say okay I'll accept housing, would it be possible to back out. Chief Bennett answered absolutely, that would be whole goal, to get the person the help they need. If during the process they changed their mind and wanted to accept housing, that could happen. Councilmember Paine referred to the rule making and procedures described in ordinance 5.07.060, and said documenting a point or two on the webpage would be adequate for her. It may be helpful to have a report every 12-18 months from the police department describing the highs, lows, good and bad, particularly if this ordinance is enacted. Chief Bennett agreed a report could be provided to describe how things are going. Councilmember L. Johnson commented the council is debating the civil liberties of the most vulnerable residents. She referred to Section 5.70.060, relaying her understanding that the rules, regulation, administrative policies will be worked out and are not in place yet. The council also hasn't defined what constituted adequate. The Boise case is based on the 8` Amendment related to cruel and unusual punishment. She asked whether it was cruel to criminalize someone sleeping on the street when shelter options are constrained by mental illness or addition. If the shelter will not accept them due to those issues, she wondered if they would be criminalized because they were mental ill or addicted. Councilmember L. Johnson respected that staff was saying the first goal was to work with them and find them services, yet with the woman last summer, which seems to be the impetus for much of this ordinance, there were a lot of hurdles to overcome. If this ordinance had been in place, she wondered if the time necessary would have been taken to find the services that fit that woman's needs and got her in the place she is today or would the process have been rushed before appropriate services were found for her, an Edmonds resident who was unhoused. None of that is answered in the ordinance, yet the council is being asked to vote on it and say it will be worked out. As Councilmember Chen said, there should at least be an attachment that identifies the process as it exists today. Chief Bennett said without a crystal ball, she did not know how quickly last summer's situation would have been resolved. She knew that the length of time it took caused a lot of difficult times for the family living in the house next door, fear by their children, etc. She referred to a person with mental health struggles sleeping in a city park which is a violation and a misdemeanor who was asked to leave numerous times, and finally given a citation because the police wanted arrest to be the absolutely last resort. The police tried everything, offering services, got Ms. Burley involved, and a mental health professional came out who he unfortunately threatened. On the third night the officers warned him if he was there the next day, they would arrest him and take him to jail. Chief Bennett continued, he was there the next night and was arrested and taken to jail and released within 12 hours. The police stored his property which he retrieved but he never came back to the park. It was a Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 74 violation and it wasn't until there were consequences to his behavior that he stopped sleeping in that park. He was scaring people and staff and there were numerous calls about him. He eventually got the services he needed and is now happily housed. With regard to the woman who was unhoused, Chief Bennett said she eventually got the services she needed and it was unfortunate it took many months and created a lot of issues for the adults and children who lived there. The police department's ultimate goal is to serve everyone in the community to the best of their ability. Councilmember L. Johnson asked when someone is offered services, is it confirmed that there are services available to them. Mayor Pro Tern Olson asked councilmembers to keep their comments to the amendment. Councilmember L. Johnson said Mayor Pro Tern Olson was choosing the questions she could ask and the appropriateness of her questions and she was speaking to the motion. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT CALLED THE QUESTION. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION TO CALL THE QUESTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember L. Johnson raised a point of clarification, was Councilmember Chen's motion that it would be an attachment to the ordinance. Councilmember Chen restated the amendment: REQUEST POLICE CHIEF BENNETT COME UP WITH OPERATING PROCEDURES TO BE AN ATTACHMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis raised a point of order and offered to make a substitute motion. Mr Taraday advised that was not permitted as the question had been called. AMENDMENT FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT, PAINE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for the motion as amended. A lot of assumptions have been made, one of which is if a councilmember supports the ordinance, they are unsympathetic to people in different situations and are unhoused. That is not accurate; most would say they want the best for people in difficult situations. There is also an assumption that people who are unhoused in the City's parks or in other public places are from Edmonds, but that is unknown and there have been many circumstances to the contrary. Another assumption is there are no resources; more resources are coming from Snohomish County and the Health District than there were a year ago and the state has significantly increased funding and is about to double it again. He had an extensive conversation this week with an assistant to the county executive who said more resources are being developed both for housing and mental health support. The assumption that there are no resources is not accurate. Allowing people to stay in parks or occupy public space has not worked out well in other cities and he could cite examples. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT CALLED THE QUESTION. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. Councilmember K. Johnson observed the council has received many emails from people who support this general idea and others who do not support it. She asked Ms. Taraday whether other cities in Snohomish Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 75 7.6.a County that have similar ordinances. Ms. Taraday answered when the city attorney's office was approached to review this issue, they were asked to look at the City of Redmond's ordinance and they also researched other ordinances. The City of Mercer Island as well as other cities have recently passed ordinances, but was unsure off the top of her head which other cities in Snohomish County have similar ordinances. Chief Bennett advised Lynnwood does. Ms. Taraday said a lot of cities are implementing and adopting these types of ordinances. Councilmember K. Johnson asked Chief Bennett to explain the procedural process for implementing the ordinance as written. Chief Bennett answered procedurally if the police department is called to or through an on -view or self -initiated activity come upon a person who is camping overnight, officers first contact human services to ascertain what kind of services the person can be provided and what their needs are and offer assistance. If no shelter is available, there are no motel vouchers available, and there is no place for a person to go, the police will simply leave the scene. The ordinance does not allow for any action if no shelter is available which is part of the Boise decision. If there is shelter available or there are motel vouchers, about half the time a person will take a motel voucher, and transportation is provided. Once the person is provided shelter, human services continues to offer wraparound services such as a caseworker's assessment to assist the person more holistically. If the person refuses shelter or motel voucher and indicates they plan to stay, they will be told the City has an ordinance that does not allow overnight camping and they could be arrested if they remain. At that point the person is free to go elsewhere. If the person refuses to leave, the person would be placed under arrest. At any point, the person could agree to accept shelter or accept other assistance. Councilmember K. Johnson commented without this ordinance, it seems like the police have no final alternative, they cannot say the person will be arrested. Chief Bennett said without the ordinance, the officers would have to walk away and the person can continue to camp there for infinity and the police have no recourse. Councilmember K. Johnson said that is what some cities to south have been dealing with. Councilmember K. Johnson asked Ms. Burley if she had anything else to add regarding her experiences with homeless persons in Edmonds. Mayor Pro Tem Olson asked if her question was related to passage of the ordinance. Councilmember K. Johnson answered yes. Ms. Burley answered it is a really complex issue, staff sees so many different types of people with different types of crises. From a procedural perspective, human services relies on the police department to ensure the safety of the social worker and/or first responder which is why they make the initial contact and not human services. Once human services knows the situation is safe, they need to know quite a bit of information about the individual because each shelter has unique strengths, weakness and opportunities. For example, if the person was male, a women only shelter would not accept them. A domestic violence situation is treated also differently. There was an individual who was disabled and in a wheelchair, but only available room didn't work because there were stairs. There are a host of questions that need to be answered before human services can begin seeking available shelter. Ms. Burley continued, in practice, most likely a temporary hotel voucher would be offered to buy human services more time to seek a longer term solution. A call from Chief Bennett in the middle of night and human services calling shelters will not yield much, because shelters are also closed. There are limitation to securing shelter for an individual. Understanding a person's mental health status and substance abuse disorder status also matters because some shelters will accept individuals who need wraparound services and others will not. Often a motel may deny services to someone who is deescalating or would do better in a medical setting. She summarized finding shelter takes time. She appreciated Chief Bennett bringing up one of the individuals that human services has worked with who is now in permanent supportive housing. To help that person get to that situation, there needed to be an opportunity to connect with the individual and they were resistant to efforts to help. Staff does encounter situations where it is equally heartbreaking Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 76 that people aren't willing to accept the help staff wants to provide to help them help themselves. The vast majority of people want to be off streets and usually people say yes to available shelter. Councilmember K. Johnson asked how frequently they encounter homeless people and how many homeless people human services has found housing for in the past year. Ms. Burley said human services is contacted by individuals experiencing housing crisis nearly every day. Not all those individuals are living in tents on a sidewalk. There are a lot of housing insecure people in Edmonds in need of help and staff is in a constant cycle of connecting people to appropriate services. She acknowledged the council has received numerous emails regarding the wait list to get into shelters and into services and even how long it takes after calling 211 to receive services. Councilmember K. Johnson said she did not have a feeling for how many homeless people were sleeping on sidewalks or encampments or the interurban trail. Ms. Burley answered the number of people they have received complaints about due to where people are living is quite low right now. The police encounter many more people than human services is trying to coordinate housing for. Staff has heard loud and clear from Chief Bennett that the social worker cannot start soon enough and staff is aware the police department has a list of people they want to try to get services for as soon the social worker is hired. It may be a better question for Chief Bennett regarding how many people the police encounter that this ordinance may apply to. With regard to the number of housing insecure people human services is working with, it is a lot. As the Kone report indicated, many of them are couch surfing, staying with relatives, or finding other shelter. The Parks crew is aware of a couple of people they encounter on a more regular basis. It is a transitory situation where there are significant services to the south and north of Edmonds and services in this region are incredibly limited. Often when individuals are connected to services, they have to go elsewhere. Councilmember K. Johnson said those answers were helpful in considering the main motion. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis referred to Section 5.70.060 Rules, stating her belief that SOPs should not be required and she concurred with Councilmember Paine's comments. She was going to make a substitute motion to request semi-annual reports be made to the PSPP committee and asked if that would be possible. Chief Bennett answered she can do whatever the council asks, recognizing there are limited resources. As a councilmember can always ask for a report to a committee, she was unsure she wanted to codify that request. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis said reports would help councilmembers and citizens understand the status. She had total faith in the police department, noting body cameras would also be helpful, and the police departments procedures are very empathetic and compassionate. Mayor Pro Tern Olson referred to feedback about a sense of rushing this through. This has been a topic of conversation and a work in progress for many months, beginning with the work done by the homelessness task force where this concept originated along with many other things dealing with the underlying causes. Since the task force concluded in January 2022, the city attorney, human services program manager and the police chief have been working together to construct the ordinance. This is the third time it has been before council. At this point if councilmember have amendments, those could be discussed, but councilmembers know how they plan to vote on the overall concept and it would be beneficial to conclude this tonight. Ordinance and codes are not permanent and if the council becomes aware of an area that needs improvement, it can be revisited. She noted the time, 9:25 p.m., and was hopeful councilmembers would support extending the meeting if further discussion was needed. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the procedure that Chief Bennett described when the police department encounters someone who looks like they intend to spend the night outside on public property, that they call human services to make an assessment. She assumed the police often encounter people in the evening hours. She asked the human services division's hours, noting until this week, the human services manager was part time but is now full time and the City does not have a social worker or anyone available 24/7. She asked how an assessment was made if there was no one on the clock to do it and what the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 77 7.6.a procedure was at that point. Chief Bennett answered all the sergeants have been issued credit cards as a result of $7,000 in emergency relief funds provided by Snohomish County. If it is nighttime and officers are unable to contact human services, a shelter, or other methodology, several times sergeants have purchased a motel room for the person and gotten them to the motel. The same rules would apply if the person refused shelter, etc. The person's information and location is then given to Ms. Burley or Ms. Woods via email or phone call that night or the next morning so they can do an assessment. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO EXTEND TO 9:50. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND PAINE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS, AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON, TO EXTEND TO 9:45. MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON CALLED THE QUESTION ON THE MAIN MOTION. MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE, L. JOHNSON AND CHEN VOTING NO. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND 9:35. MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE, L. JOHNSON AND K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. 4. ADJOURN The council meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 5, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 78 7.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Council Committee Minutes Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Committee Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative The Council committee meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: PSPP051022 FC051022 PPW051022 Packet Pg. 79 7.7.a PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING May 10, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair) Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Councilmember Susan Paine Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Scott Passey, City Clerk Councilmember Will Chen Jeff Taraday, City Attorney 1. CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPP Committee meeting was called to order at 4:30 p.m. by Councilmember L. Johnson. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Update to Personnel Policy 3.10 Job Assignments Ms. Neill Hoyson explained this proposed update to personnel policies would allow the executive branch to make minor updates to job descriptions that would not impact the overall duties, intention of a position or compensation. Currently, city council must approve every change to job descriptions. When a position becomes vacant, departments are asked to ensure the job classification is correct, reflects the duties, etc. Due to the tight recruitment market and the need to fill positions quickly, often departments do not update job descriptions because it may take up to a month for it go through the council committee and council approval process before the job can be posted. Questions and discussion followed regarding adding to the revised language "or any changes required by changes in law," support for allowing the administration to make minor changes especially in this tight job market, equity fixes such as removing the requirement for a driver's license for jobs that do not require driving, considering life experiences in lieu of a degree, what constitutes a minor change, a suggestion to email minor changes to job descriptions to the PSPP committee members to provide oversight, support for removing process, and job description changes that will continue to come to council. Action: Consent agenda 2. Update on City Recruitment Ms. Neill Hoyson reported the mayor is in the process of interviewing candidates for the economic development & community services director position. Once he provides his feedback, the candidates will be scheduled for council interviews. Five candidates for the public works director position are being interviewed tomorrow. Feedback from those interviews will be provided to the mayor, candidates will be interviewed by the mayor, and then interviews held with council. There are seven vacancies in the WWTP positions, the City is in bargaining with the union which includes issues intended to address recruiting challenges. One WWTP operator in training has been hired but the position will remain open with the possibility of hiring candidates as temporary hires. There are five vacancies for WWTP operators; one has been hired. There are challenges across the industry with hiring operators. A WWTP maintenance mechanic position has also been posted Questions and discussion followed regarding the urgent need for WWTP employees, rationale for temporary hires, whether temporary hires could become permanent employees, whether the change in Packet Pg. 80 7.7.a 05/10/22 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 2 technology at the WWTP impacts hiring, addressing position classifications in bargaining, and hiring challenges. Action: Update only. 3. Proposed Updates to Employee Reimbursement Policy Mr. Turley advised the intent was to describe the proposed changes, gather committee feedback and return the revised policy to the committee next month. In addition to minor cleanup of language and updates, he sought the committee's feedback on, 1) improving the clarity of the policy regarding who can purchase something without preapproval and be reimbursed; typically unless someone is a director or council president, without pre -approval, reimbursement may be denied, 2) the auditors pointed out the reimbursement policy states the City is not allowed to pay for food at retirement parties, but City code states it is allowed, and 3) a proposed change to allow a gift up to $100 for a retirement. Questions and discussion regarding the definition of "reasonable," how council training is approved, a preference to have policies related to council in the council's rules and procedures, volunteer recognition events, clarifying that alcohol is not eligible for reimbursement, working lunches, having full council weigh in on whether to remove reference to council in the reimbursement policy, and some councilmembers' interest in having the reimbursement policy include both employees and council. Action: Return to committee next month. 4. Peace Run Resolution Council President Olson advised the packet included a sample resolution; this is an international initiative. If committee members are satisfied with the resolution, the intent is have it on next week's consent agenda. Questions and discussion followed regarding the lack of information in the packet regarding this event, concern the agenda memo assigns research homework to committee members, concern with putting one's name on a resolution without further information about the organization, councilmembers typically having a connection to an event/issue, concern the resolution is not specific to Edmonds, whether the council has ever had a resolution regarding a run, a resolution regarding Ukraine that was pulled from the agenda, who was co -sponsoring the run in Edmonds, and plans for ceremony in the City on May 18th Action: No recommendation by committee. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 5:27 p.m. Packet Pg. 81 7.7.b FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING May 10, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair) Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Councilmember Will Chen Rob English, Interim Public Works Director Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Megan Menkveld, Deputy Admin. Serv. Dir. Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager Scott Passey, City Clerk Jeff Taraday, City Attorney CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online Finance Committee meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Councilmember Buckshnis. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Capital Maintenance Bond Protect Mr. English explained when the budget was prepared, the bond was not finalized so projects were put into Fund 016. His and Mr. Sullivan's recommendation is to use general fund dollars for the EV charging stations and the solar project. Mr. Sullivan reviewed a list of current projects and described proqress on each: Fund 016 General Government Funds Fund 016 Bond Proceeds DP#45 Public Works Yard Leveling $110,000 DP#71 Citywide Electric Vehicle Chargers $260,000 DP#73 Painting of Various Bldgs. $230,000 DP#74 Library West Deck Repairs $60,000 DP#75 Fleet EV Charging Infrastructure $90,000 Total $580,000 $400,000 Mr. Sullivan displayed a complete list of building maintenance projects, noting the total ($1,125,000) exceeds the bond amount. Some projects will be included in future budgets; some projects are intended to assist with future grant availability. Questions and discussion followed regarding concern the ordinance does not address financing any new projects but two have been financed (EV charging stations and solar project), budget amendment last month that addressed this issue, no requirement to track bond funds by project, maintenance that addressed leaks in city hall, maintenance of the Boys & Girls Club building, ownership of Boys & Girls Club building, prioritizing projects for expenditure of bond funds, requirement in 2028 for buildings to meet an EUI score, legislative intent to use bond proceeds to fund "unsexy projects," and impact of labor shortage on projects. Action: Information only. 2. Biennial Budget Discussion Mr. Turley described moving to a biennial budget. • Noteworthy discussion points o Operating under a biennial budget instead of an annual budget frees up hundreds of hours in every odd -numbered year — e.g., 2023, 2025, 2027, etc. N N 0 0 U U_ c d E U �a r w Q Packet Pg. 82 7.7.b 05/10/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 o The term for an appointed councilmember ends when the election is certified — last year this was November 23. This would always happen in an odd year (e.g., 2021) . Because under a biennial budget the new budget is passed in even years, the conflict of seating a new councilmember in the middle of budget deliberations would never happen. o A biennial budget schedule allows more time during the first 18 months of the biennium to monitor and evaluate the city's financial performance and condition. o A biennial budget schedule would allow time in the odd years to undertake major changes, like implementing "Budgeting by Priorities" for example. o A biennial budget would have no impact on planning and budgeting for large capital projects (e.g., Civic Field, Highway 99 Revitalization). Planning for large projects like these already involve multiple years, and a biennial budget would actually be more in line with planning for multi -year projects. o For context, many neighboring cities are already on biennial budgets, including Lynnwood, Bothell, Mountlake Terrace, Shoreline, Marysville, Kirkland, Kenmore, Mill Creek, Arlington, Snohomish, and Stanwood, and is considered a "Best Practice" among finance professionals. For additional information, a copy of biennial budget process used by the City of Kirkland is included in tonight's council packet. o To move to a biennial budget for the upcoming biennium, RCW requires that Council pass an ordinance before June 30, 2022. Earlier would be better for planning and preparation purposes. A draft copy of this ordinance in tonight's council packet. o Some sample schedules are included in the packet to provide a concrete idea of what the new schedules would look like. Questions and discussion followed regarding the council's return to an annual budget during the great recession, concern the council loses control and oversight with a biennial budget, current issues that do not support changing to a biennial budget, concern with last year's budget process, streamlining the budget process, working toward a biennial budget in two years, tangible benefits of a biennial budget such as reducing the labor intensive budgeting process, the June 30 deadline to pass an ordinance to change to a biennial budget, code language regarding biennial budget, biennial budget increasing the council's capacity for other oversight, the council's ability to make budget amendments at any time, reasons to wait two years to change to a biennial budget, citizens having less exposure to the city's finances with a biennial budget, and options (change to biennial budget now, stay with annual budget, or plan to make transition in two years and specify what needs to be done in the meantime to support that decision). Action: Full council. 3. Enterprise Resource Planning System (ERP) Replacement: Update Request Ms. Menkveld reviewed ERP system options: OpenGov Budget Suite Option 1. only OpenGov (12 to 15 months) 2. only Munis (24 to 28 months) Or other 3. OpenGov Budget plus Munis ERP Budget Suite (5 months) ERP (x r • Sole Source • Attaches to any ERP system Questions and discussion followed regarding progress on the ERP system, go live date for OpenGov budget and reporting suite, elements of the ERP system, vendor selection for the ERP system, hiring a project manager to assist with selection of an ERP system, and vetting OpenGov and Munis. N N 0 T_ to 0 U r c as E a Action: Update only. Packet Pg. 83 7.7.b 05/10/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3 4. Proposed Updates to Leak Adjustment Policy Mr. Turley reviewed: • What is a leak adjustment: o Occasionally a water customer will discover that their plumbing has a leak. This will cause higher water usage and a higher water bill. If caught quickly, the additional cost may only be a few hundred dollars more than normal. Sometimes a leak may be large and go undetected for several weeks, causing the loss of large amounts of water and increases to the customer's water bill of several thousand dollars. The City could just charge the full amount, but we have tried to provide a way to mitigate this unexpected cost. o Current Policy: ■ Customer has to show that they took reasonable steps to fix the leak as soon as it was discovered. Subject to meeting certain requirements, the City will do the following: - Compute what their average bill has been and charge them that, then - Forgive up to $1,000 of the excess, then - Take the remainder and bill that amount to them at wholesale, then - Add a 15% administration fee to the wholesale amount. • Considerations o Question 1. Should we forgive $1,000 of the bill, and do we need to add back the 15% administration fee? (Proposal #1 would be to remove the forgiveness of $1,000 and remove the 15% administration fee add back) o Question 2. Why are we reducing their bill at all? (Proposal #2 would be to offer no leak adjustment) o Question 3. Does council have an alternative proposal? o Payment plan ■ Under the old policy, customer is allowed to pay the balance off over 3 months at 12% interest. ■ Proposal is to update this to allow them to pay it over 6 months at 0% interest. • Comparison of proposed policies o Let's say a current customer usually consumes 14 units and pays $59 per invoice, but after having a large leak they consumed 1,726 units and their bill with tax came to $8,030. o Our wholesale rate is $1.50 per unit, our retail rate is $4.23 per unit. Our computations would be: Proposed Policy Proposal #2-No Current Policy #1 Adjustment Average Units Billed (14 UnitsE at retail $ 59 $ 59 $ - ExcessUnits(1,725-14)at wholesale 21568 2,568 - 5uhtotal - revised hill computation 2,627 2,627 7,300 Add 15%Admin Fee on the Excess Units 385 - - Subtotal 3.012 2,627 7,300 Forgive $1,000 (1,0001 - - Subtotal 2.012 21627 7,300 Add M tax 2D1 263 720 Total Due (Revised Bill to Customer) $ 2,214 $ 2.890 $ 8.030 Clriginal Bill(IncludingrFax} $ sjw3 $ 3,030 $ 8,030 Revised Bill 2,214 2,890 8,030 AmountPeduced due to policy $ 5.816 $ 5,140 $ - Questions and discussion followed regarding support for helping residents particularly during these hard times, investing in a smart system in the long term to monitor flow and avoid wasting water, and a suggestion to charge wholesale for leaked water and offer a payment plan. Packet Pg. 84 7.7.b 05/10/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 4 Action: Staff return to committee with a r)olicv that charges wholesale for the leaked water. 5. March 2022 Quarterly Financial Report Mr. Turley responded to council questions regarding the anomaly in the gas utility tax, and REET being below budget. Action: Short presentation to full council. 6. Finance Committee Agenda Planning Topics the committee identified included: • Risk review policy • Fund balance policy • Utility rate issue • Public safety complex relocation review • Budget calendar Questions and discussion followed regarding the EDC investigating relocation of the public safety complex, and past investigation done of available space on Highway 99. Councilmember Chen will contact the employee staffing the EDC with the suggestion that the EDC investigate relocation of the public safety complex. Action: Planning purposes. 7. 2022 State Auditor Office (SAO) Audit Exit Follow Up Mr. Taraday relayed his understanding that the audit finding regarding CARES funds distribution was that the City did not document compliance with the City's own eligibility requirements; there was no finding that the City's CARES fund distribution failed to comply with any state or federal criteria, therefore, there was no basis to conclude the money needed to be paid back based on the limited findings by the state auditor's office. Mr. Turley explained the auditors highlighted 109 businesses with questioned costs, they did not say the businesses were not eligible, only that they could not tell if they were eligible based on documentation the City received. Businesses were asked to submit information related to business loss for April and May 2020. City staff is reviewing those 109 businesses to determine how to proceed and available options. Mr. Taraday relayed the administration has not finalized its recommendation regarding these 109 businesses. Questions and discussion followed regarding the auditor's comment regarding the municipal court, whether CARES distributions need to be returned, the auditor's finding that CARES fund distribution did not meet the City's eligibility requirements, how the issues will be corrected, the council's role in pursuing businesses that did not meet the criteria, administration providing a recommendation at some point regarding whether to pursue repayment, timeframe for administration to provide a recommendation and whether additional help will be necessary, whether council would direct the city attorney to pursue legal action, steps for determining who warrants further action, whether small claims was an option, and long term debt the auditors said should be under direct borrowing instead of general obligation bonds. Action: Revisit at the next committee meeting. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. N N O LO 0 U u_ c as E V a Packet Pg. 85 7.7.c PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING May 10, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Rob English, Interim Public Works Director Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural Arts & Human Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Serv. Dir. Councilmember Diane Buckshnis Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec. & Cultural Arts & Human Serv. Dir. Pam Randolph, WWTP Manager Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online PPW Committee meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. by Councilmember Tibbott. It was agreed to move Item 2.8 prior to Item 2.3. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. 4th of July, Taste Edmonds, Car Show Event Agreements Ms. Burley explained these three events are put on by the Chamber. The biggest change to the 4th of July agreement is there will be no fireworks due to construction of Civic Park. Funding received from Hazel Miller will be used to partner with Mountlake Terrace to expand their fireworks show. The 4th of July agreement covers the main parade, children's parade and Beat Brackett 1 k and 5k run. Taste Edmonds, a Seafair sanctioned event, will be slightly smaller and held at the Frances Anderson Center due to construction at Civic Park. Taste is the Chambers' largest fundraising event with revenues supporting other events. In response to feedback, the event will close an hour earlier and it will be open to all ages. The Classic Car Show, a one -day event, is largely the same as previous years. New this year, there will be one officer assigned to the event. Ms. Burley recognized the Chamber for the work they do to put on events. Questions and discussion followed regarding the Chamber putting on events that bring the community together and bring people from outside the area, the city attorney's approval of the agreements, and staff's work on an agreement for Oktoberfest. Action: Consent agenda 2. Supplemental Agreement with HKA Global, Inc for the Carbon Recovery Protect Ms. Randolph described challenges with the carbon recovery project due to the supply chain and cost impacts. The carbon recovery project had a guaranteed G-max price and a certain timeline; however, due to cost overruns and delivery timeframes, there have been challenges with the ESCO company, Ameresco. As a result a decision was made to hire HKA Global to help work out contract and construction challenges. HKA's assistance has been very beneficial and staff would like them continue Packet Pg. 86 7.7.c 5/10/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 through the end of the project. The total cost is $144,175; the first $55,000 was approved by the mayor, and the request is for an additional $89,000 which requires council approved. The cost will be shared with the WWTP partners; Edmonds' portion is $73,223. Questions and discussion followed regarding time remaining on the project, an example of how HKA has helped understand service agreement, project complexities that create challenges for DEIS, other Ameresco projects, Ameresco contract requests, whether Ameresco would pay for any of the cost of HKA, and whether the outcome of HKA's involvement will be a successful project. Action: Consent agenda 8. Presentation of a Professional Services Agreement with ESA for Design and Permitting Services for the Lower Perrinville Creek Recovery Project Mr. English explained this is a professional services agreement for design of an interim solution to solve the current issue where water is not getting to the existing BNSF culvert as well as a long-term plan for that section of the creek from Talbot Road out to Puget Sound. This contract would take design to 60% as well as permitting and community outreach. Paul Schlenger and John Ambrose, ESA, reviewed: • Perrinville Creek setting and current infrastructure 0 3 culverts o Perrinville Creek flows across three private properties downstream of Talbot Road o City diversion structure o Proximity to McLaughlin and Robinson residences • Photos of flooding and sediment deposition • No remaining stream channel downstream of diversion o Before and after photos of McLaughlin and Robinson properties • Looking upstream of Talbot Road culvert o Talbot Road culvert prevented more extreme flooding and sediment deposition downstream • Perrinville Creek — current conditions o Currently all flow routed into City's culvert and no fish passage is possible into the creek o WDFW and Tribes demanding creek returned to a channel providing fish access to the creek • Proposed solution and sequence 1. Interim action — in summer 2022, excavate new stream channel from diversion structure to BNSF culvert 2. Long-term solution — replace undersized culverts through BNSF embankment with properly sized bridge or box culvert 3. Fish passage at Talbot Road — replace undersized culvert at Talbot Road with properly sized bridge or culvert • Interim Action Alternatives o Dashed lines on map showing three alternate alignments for interim action o These have been presented to WDFW, Tribes and landowners • Long-term solution at railroad o Properly size replacement structure through BNSF railroad embankment • Proposed Scope of work for interim Action and 60% Design of Long-term solution at Railroad and Talbot Road o Preparing necessary information for infrastructure and stream design o Design of interim action (stream channel and diversion structure modification) o Design of long term railroad crossing and Talbot Road o Public engagement and city council engagement; stakeholder meetings o Project management • Proposed budget Packet Pg. 87 7.7.c 5/10/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 Work Elements Proposed budget Preparing necessary information $230,938 Design of interim Action* $43,400 Design of Railroad and Talbot road crossings $436,246 Engagement with public, city council and stakeholders $121,090 Project management $25,200 M mt. reserve $50,000 Total $906,919 *Design of interim action dependent on other work elements, notable preparing necessary information to support the design and the engagement with public, city council and stakeholders. Questions and discussion following regarding when the diversion channel was built, where the water is coming from, sediment on the Puget Sound side, which of the interim action alternatives follows the natural alignment, the Tribes' preferred alignment, drivers for the alignment, which alignment has the best chance of having the least amount of reconstruction between the interim and the permanent alignment, this contract getting the project to 60% design followed by final design and construction, estimated construction cost, a preference to look at the entire area from the top of the creek to Brown's Bay to see how it has changed and what the issues are, concern whatever is done to strengthen the mouth of Perrinville Creek will result in erosion issues upstream, and moving forward with an interim solution. Mr. De Lilla explained the City contracted with Tetra Tech to do an analysis of the Perrinville Basin and to consider what was done in 2015 to aid in reducing peak flows. The study concluded Edmonds has approximately 30-35% of the entire basin area that contributes to Perrinville and the remainder is within Lynnwood or the county park. He reviewed a map of the current basin limits and a Perrinville Creek flow evaluation from the Tetra Tech study. The goal of the study was to find ways to mitigate flows within the right-of-way. The conclusion was an average of 12% of the basin is within City rights -of -way. The study developed a top 30 list of projects along with discussion about building rain gardens within rights - of -way. • Possible project criteria 0 30 possible projects (14 Edmonds/16 Lynnwood) feasible sites 0 12 recommended (7 Edmonds/5 Lynnwood) meeting all 3 criteria below ■ A project cost below $450k per cfs of 2-year peak flow reduction ■ An overall 2-year peak flow reduction greater than 0.15 cfs ■ Limited siting and construction constraints • Perrinville Flow Reduction Projects/Studies/Agreements (city) 0 8 completed projects 0 3 projects in 2022 Mr. English said time is of the essence. The goal would be to present this to full council for approval; however, agendas are full for the next two meetings. Options include, 1) putting ECA under contract for an amount under $100,000 to start on an interim effort, or 2) finding time on a council agenda to present the entire contract. Questions and discussion followed regarding support for a contract for the interim work, a preference to hold another executive session before deciding how to proceed, the need to approve ESA's contract in order to proceed, high priority of this item, the ESA contract assisting with negotiations with property owners if they see the city is committed to designing a long term solution under the tracks, a suggestion to place an interim contract with ESA on the consent agenda, amount of interim design work the mayor could approve without council approval, importance of the project requiring full council review and a detailed presentation, providing fish passage under BNSF and Talbot Road, preference to complete the conversation in executive session, and potential federal funding for the project. Packet Pg. 88 7.7.c 5/10/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4 Action: Full council as soon as possible 3. Presentation of Construction Contract for the 76th Overlay Project Mr. English explained this project has been in the CIP for a couple years. The design phase is nearly complete and staff expects to advertise for bids this month. The scope of work is overlaying 76th Ave from 196th to Olympic View Drive. A federal grant was secured for 2.5" grind and pavement overlay. The intent is to bring bids to council for award at the June 7th meeting. This is a joint project with the City of Lynnwood. Council previously approved restriping the northbound bike lane from 1961h to the southern edge at Perrinville which is also part of this scope of work. The engineer's estimate for the overlay and 12 ADA ramps (9 in Edmonds, 3 in Lynnwood) is $1.4 million split approximately half between Edmonds and Lynnwood. Action: Consent agenda. 4. Presentation of a Local Agency Consultant Agreement with WSP for Construction Management Services on the 76th Ave Overlay Project Mr. English explained this is the construction management contract for the project in Item 3. An RFQ was issued in March that was paired with the Highway 99 project to get economies of scale. The draft scope of work covers inspection, contract administration, and material testing. Contract administration is more time consuming and involved due to federal funds. WSP was selected by the selection panel based on their qualifications and experience. Discussions are ongoing regarding the scope and fee; he anticipated the budget would be approximately $200,000, with approximately half paid by Lynnwood. The funding source is the federal grant and local match from the REET 125 Fund. Due to difficulty in the Puget Sound area meeting federal allocation targets, this project may receive an additional $170,000 in federal funds which would reduce the local contribution. That will be confirmed next month. Action: Consent agenda. 5. Presentation of Local Agency Consultant Agreement with WSP for Construction Management Services on the Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization Stage 2 Mr. English commented this project is more time sensitive than the 76th Ave overlay as the construction contract was awarded next week. WSP will provide construction management services which includes inspection, contract administration, material testing, and communication and outreach due to the project size and impact to property owners and businesses on Highway 99. The total construction budget is $8.4 million, of which $6.4 million was the construction contract with Westwater, and approximately $1 million was allocated for construction management which includes City staff time, this consultant, and other miscellaneous costs related to interpretation/translation services. He anticipated the fee for this contract would be $700,000. Questions and discussion followed regarding WSP's experience with community outreach, the total fee, phases of the Highway 99 revitalization project, $700,000 being a large amount for a consent agenda item, and comfort with placing this item on the consent agenda because council has heard a lot about the project. Action: Consent agenda 6. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with HBB for Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization - Stage 2 Packet Pg. 89 7.7.c 5/10/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 5 Mr. English explained HBB was hired to design the gateway signs, lighting and landscaping. HBB is near the end of that design work, a remaining elements is a structural evaluation of the two signs. The proposed supplement is $5,000; the work will be done by CG Engineering. He requested an additional $5,000 for management reserve so the total amount of the supplement would be $10,000, funded by the Connecting Washington funds. The original HBB management reserve was used for items beyond the original scope of work such as additional public outreach, working with the property owner, and development of additional conceptual drawings. Action: Consent agenda. 7. Report of Bids for the 2022 Utility Replacement Project Mr. English explained this project which consolidated the watermain, sewer and stormwater pipe replacement into one contract, was advertised in April. He reviewed: • Bid Results Company Bid Amount Shoreline Construction $3,685,030 Marshbank Construction $4,257,000 Engineer's estimate $3,581,500 • Proposed construction budget Description Amount Contract Award $3,685,030.33 Construction award m mt. reserve 15% $552,754.55 Construction m mt, inspection and testing 15% $552,754.55 Total $4,790,539.43 • Construction Funding Funding Amount Water Fund $805,308.61 Storm Fund $2,035,528.05 Sewer Fund $1,949,702.77 Total $4,790,539.43 Questions and discussion followed regarding the reason for increasing the management reserve to 15%, amount of the management reserve, concern with placing a project of this size on the consent agenda, and a suggestion to revise the agenda memo to describe consolidation of projects, etc. Action: Consent agenda 9. 2023-2028 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Mr. Hauss displayed the six -year TIP, explaining it is updated annually and lists all the transportation projects planned in the next six years; the first three years are constrained, the last three are unconstrained. A public hearing is scheduled for next week. He highlighted project categories including new projects not identified last year, new projects with recently submitted/upcoming grant applications, recently submitted/upcoming grant application (previously identified in the TIP), secured grant funding (identified in last year's TIP), and recently secured grants. Discussion followed regarding commendation to staff for securing grants and a suggestion to add a slide for the public hearing with the location of projects with secured grants and projects that grants have been submitted for. Action: Public hearing next week Packet Pg. 90 7.7.c 5/10/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 6 10. Dedication of Bracket's Reserve Plat "Road A" as a Public Street Named 91st PI W Mr. English explained this is a proposed 11-lot subdivision with a future street name of 91s' Place West. A street dedication is required with the subdivision, 24' with 1' of curb and gutter, 22' of pavement and S sidewalks. Action: Consent agenda. 11. Interlocal Agreement with Community Transit Mr. English relayed Community Transit informed the City of the need to trim trees near bus stops that impact double-decker buses. Community Transit initially asked the City to do tree trimming at the City's cost, but have since offered an interlocal agreement to pay the actual cost of tree trimming. The City will manage the effort including obtaining approval from property owners whose trees encroach into the right-of-way and the bus stop. Questions and discussion followed regarding relying on the tree trimming company to trim trees appropriately, concern 14' high trimming could change the shape of some trees, pros and cons of trimming trees, having the City Arborist evaluate the tree trimming scope of work, and trimming evergreen versus deciduous trees. Action: Consent agenda with the addition the City Arborist will evaluate the tree trimming scope of work. 12. Public Works CIP-CFP Review Councilmember Tibbott expressed interest in projects the concrete crew has done since their inception and an understanding of how their work is assigned. Action: Schedule on next PPW meeting agenda 13. Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Dept Q1 Report Committee members were impressed with how much has been done in the past quarter and progress that has been made in parks and human services. Action: Written report for information only 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:41 p.m. Packet Pg. 91 7.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Megan Menkveld Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Lori Palmer Background/History Approval of payroll checks #65048 through #65053 for $7,610.82 dated May 5, 2022, payroll direct deposit for $638,283.70, benefit checks #65054 through #65058 and wire payments for $586,634.72 for the pay period April 16, 2022 through April 30, 2022. Staff Recommendation Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: 04-16-22 to 04-30-22 benefit checks summary report 04-16-22 to 04-30-22 payroll earnings summary report Packet Pg. 92 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,046 - 04/16/2022 to 04/30/2022 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt 65054 05/05/2022 bpas BPAS 5,083.02 65055 05/05/2022 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 106.96 65056 05/05/2022 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 3,612.69 65057 05/05/2022 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 5,879.84 65058 05/05/2022 afscme WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO 2,408.00 17,090.51 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt 3357 05/05/2022 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 298,233.01 3359 05/05/2022 aflac AFLAC 4,274.40 3361 05/05/2022 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 29,025.61 3362 05/05/2022 us US BANK 116,209.97 3363 05/05/2022 mebt WTRISC FBO #N317761 114,880.43 3365 05/05/2022 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 6,101.79 3366 05/05/2022 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 819.00 569,544.21 Grand Totals: 586,634.72 7.8.a vi a� t v r m Direct Deposit m 0.00 0.00 cv 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 a 4- 0 0.00 0 L 0. Q Q Direct Deposit V_ 0 0.00 0.00 L 0.00 0 0.00 E 0.00 E 0.00 u3i 0.00 N Y V N 0.00 v .r 0.00 c m N N O M O O r N N t0 4 O 5/4/2022 Packet Pg. 93 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,046 (04/16/2022 to 04/30/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 112 ABSENT NO PAY NON HIRED 80.00 0.00 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 811.58 36,971.07 122 VACATION VACATION 976.50 46,104.94 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 9.50 420.55 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 46.50 1,881.91 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 186.25 7,971.75 129 SICK Police Sick Leave L & 1 120.00 5,054.87 130 COMP HOURS Holiday Compensation Used 8.50 412.68 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 36.00 2,108.10 135 SICK WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEAVE 4.00 58.28 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Day Used 106.00 5,289.82 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 214.29 12,331.76 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 29.00 2,059.36 170 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL BASE PAY 700.00 9,916.62 174 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY 0.00 300.00 175 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICAL 0.00 4,055.30 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 15,425.75 720,480.69 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 4.00 5,912.37 194 SICK Emergency Sick Leave 206.00 9,435.95 195 REGULAR HOURS ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE 128.00 5,177.93 196 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 74.00 4,112.55 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 10.00 314.17 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 48.00 2,653.52 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 15.00 1,361.87 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 352.25 26,718.53 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 9.00 635.54 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 -104.21 403 MISCELLANEOUS PREMIUM PAY 0.00 503.75 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 636.67 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,099.33 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 819.60 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 74.50 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 193.00 0.00 902 MISCELLANEOUS BOOT ALLOWANCE 0.00 318.74 903 MISCELLANEOUS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 0.00 -37.50 05/04/2022 Packet Pg. 94 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,046 (04/16/2022 to 04/30/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 140.39 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 148.12 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstructionist 0.00 92.72 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 185.44 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 308.91 deftat MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 171.68 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 127.02 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 895.02 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 720.18 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 772.80 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 6,343.68 firear MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 461.43 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 273.06 less MISCELLANEOUS LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR 0.00 88.70 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 941.49 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 523.60 Ig12 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 9% 0.00 4,295.45 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 945.39 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 706.98 Iq2 LONGEVITY PAY LONGEVITY PAY 4% 0.00 259.00 Iq4 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 440.49 Iq5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 1,446.77 Iq6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 289.13 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 360.52 Iq8 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 8% 0.00 252.04 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 127.02 ooc MISCELLANEOUS OUT OF CLASS 0.00 431.45 pds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 103.70 pfmp ABSENT Paid Familv Medical Unpaid/Sup 81.88 0.00 pfms SICK Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK 24.04 1,214.47 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,624.34 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER 0.00 201.50 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 0.00 329.16 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 201.50 SOP MISCELLANEOUS Special Ops Serqeant 0.00 151.13 05/04/2022 Packet Pg. 95 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,046 (04/16/2022 to 04/30/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours St REGULAR HOURS traf MISCELLANEOUS vap VACATION Serqeant Pay TRAFFIC Vacation Premium 0.00 0.00 56.00 20, 029.54 Total Net Pay: Amount 151.13 127.02 3,288.28 $945,117.22 $645,894.52 7.8.b 05/04/2022 Packet Pg. 96 7.9 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #252278 through #252371 dated May 5, 2022 for $467,495.86, claim checks #252372 through #252471 dated May 12, 2022 for $826,664.90 (re -issued ck #252471$1,295.42) and wire payment of $3,058.76. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 05-05-22 claims 05-12-22 wire 05-12-22 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 05-12-22 Packet Pg. 97 7.9.a vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page 0 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun r 252278 5/5/2022 078918 3 WIRE LLC 0075103 WWTP: REPAIR VALVE & DOOR G/ c REPAIR VALVE & DOOR GASKET >, 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 819.3£ a 10.5% Sales Tax L_ 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 86.0E 3 Total: 905.4' �a 252279 5/5/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC INV-2-16911 EDMONDS PD - SANOGO Y ACADEMY SHIRTS U 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 47.9£ u SEWN MILITARY CREASES E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 16.0( 'R SPORT TEK SHORTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 39.9E FLEXFIT CAP _0 > 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 17.5( o BOSTON BELT a 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 21.6( Q SWEAT PANTS C%4 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 18.9£ TRAFFIC TEMPLATE c 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 14.0( o 10.1 % Sales Tax N 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 17.7f INV-2-16990 EDMONDS PD - SANOGO z CREW SWEATSHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 13.9E HEAT PRESS SWEATSHIRT E E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 17.0( m 3 HANES T SHIRTS Q 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 20.9 , HEAT PRESS 3 T SHIRTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 51.0( SPORT TEK T SHIRTS Page: 1 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 2 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252279 5/5/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC (Continued) 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 49.9E 10.1 % Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 15.4E a INV-2-16991 EDMONDS PD - HATCHETT L TIE 3 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.9, -a BLAUER CLASS A PANT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 84.9E Y BLAUER CLASS A SHIRT U 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 74.9� 10.1 % Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 16.8E n INV-2-17726 EDMONDS PD - INVENTORY U VELCRO FOR SOFT BADGE PATCH O 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 150.0( > 10.1 % Sales Tax o 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 15.1E a Total : 711.1( Q N 252280 5/5/2022 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 15-94823 INTERPRETER lA0273074 N INTERPRETER lA0273074 0 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 170.0( c 15-94984 INTERPRETER 1A0144765 (n INTERPRETER 1A0144765 E 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 170.0( TU Total : 340.0( 252281 5/5/2022 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 56992 PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUSS E PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS U 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 129.0( 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 13.5E Total: 142.5E 252282 5/5/2022 063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 0000031729 E191 PO, E198PO, E199PO & E200P Page: 2 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252282 5/5/2022 063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS (Continued) E191 PO, E198PO, E199PO & E200P 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 4,780.6E �% 10.4% Sales Tax a 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 497.1 L Total: 5,277.81, 3 252283 5/5/2022 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-208393 PM: ADA SIGNS AND POSTS PM: ADA SIGNS AND POSTS Y 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2,854.0E u 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 299.6E E Total: 3,153.7: 252284 5/5/2022 073573 ANIXTER 23K298443 PM: KEYWAYS p PM: KEYWAYS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 356.5, o 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 37.4' Q Total : 393.9E N N 252285 5/5/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 656000224722 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE LO PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 9 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 58.8, N 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 6.11 .2 656000226596 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE U PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6" E PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE Q 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE Page: 3 Packet Pg. 100 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252285 5/5/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 4 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 c 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E, 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0E a 10.5% Sales Tax L 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3- .3 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 c 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax Y 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6, y 10.5% Sales Tax U 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, E 10.5% Sales Tax ii 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, ,- 10.5% Sales Tax O 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� > 656000226603 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT o L FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS a 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� Q FLEET DIVISION MATS C%4 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1(LO 10.5% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.5 1 o 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.4, 656000228268 WWTP: 4/27/22 UNIFORMSJOWEL Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 52.6E E Rentals & Prep Charges $42.85 + $4. t 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 42.8E 10.5% Sales Tax r Q 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 5.5' 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 4.5( 656000228271 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE Page: 4 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252285 5/5/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 5 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE c E, 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 55.5( 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.& L 656000228272 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 3 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9" 10.5% Sales Tax Y 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9< 656000230018 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE U PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS E 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6- 2 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE ,U 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1- O PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE > 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1- o PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE a 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1- Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE c.i 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 - 6.1LO PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE c 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ o 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.1; 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax m 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6z t 10.5% Sales Tax r 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.61 Q 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6z 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.6E Page: 5 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 6 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252285 5/5/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 656000230022 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 2.0' Total : 396.5( 252286 5/5/2022 078237 ARIAS, ADRIAN 69559 INTERPRETER lA0186310 INTERPRETER 1A0186310 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( Tota I : 130.0( 252287 5/5/2022 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 83998 COUNCIL MEMBER NAME CHANGE Council member name changes - Wil 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 255.0( Update main City Directory at front 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 393.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 68.0� Total: 716.01 252288 5/5/2022 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 80354 ROUGH BOX - SHAW ROUGH BOX - SHAW 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 738.0( 80666 ROUGH BOX - NATHANS ROUGH BOX - NATHANS 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 738.0( Total : 1,476.0( 252289 5/5/2022 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT SUMMER CONCERTS SUMMER CONCERTS FLYER DESK SUMMER CONCERTS FLYER DESK Page: 6 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 7 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252289 5/5/2022 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT (Continued) 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 340.0( SUMMER CONCERTS SUMMER CONCERTS FLYER PRIM SUMMER CONCERTS FLYER PRIM f° a 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 175.0( (D 10.5% Sales Tax 3 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 18.3E -o Total: 533.31 M 252290 5/5/2022 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 23226 ON -CALL STORM REVIEW SERVICE U) U ON -CALL STORM REVIEW SERVICE t 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 U 23,734.0( E Total: 23,734.0( z 252291 5/5/2022 067008 BUCHANAN AUTOMATION INC 0838801 WWTP: PO 823 58D-12-116AA o PO 823 58D-12-116AA R 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 871.5( o Freight a 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 31.1 £ Q 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 94.7E N Total: 997.4E c LO 252292 5/5/2022 078083 BUYCE JR, RICHARD J 10279 10283 TRAINING 10279 102083 PERSONAL TRAININ( 10279 PERSONAL TRAINING INSTP E 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 60.0( .� 10283 PERSONAL TRAINING INSTF 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 36.0( 10284 TRAINING 10284 PERSONAL TRAINING INSTF m E 10284 PERSONAL TRAINING INSTF 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 318.7E Total : 414.7E Q 252293 5/5/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 28380482 WWTP: 5/2022 CONTRACT CHG - C 5/2022 CONTRACT CHG - COPIER 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 81.8z Page: 7 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252293 5/5/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 252294 252295 252296 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 28380491 28475197 5/5/2022 003320 CASCADE MACHINERY & ELECTRIC INV1509 5/5/2022 070088 CASCADIA CONSULTING GROUP 5/5/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 8219 W 434391 7.9.a Page: 8 PO # Description/Account Amoun c 10.5% Sales Tax m E, 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 8.6( HS C2571F COPIER: S/N 3CE09644 f° a PM C2571F COPIER: S/N 3CE08178: L 001.000.63.557.20.45.00 31.9£ .3 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.63.557.20.45.00 c 3.3E CEMETERY MF1238 COPIER: S/N 3 Y CEMETERY MF1238 COPIER: S/N 3 y 130.000.64.536.50.45.00 8.6E 10.5% Sales Tax E 130.000.64.536.50.45.00 0.9- 2 Total : 135.3' ,- 0 WWTP: PO 815 FLOATING SCUM S R PO 815 FLOATING SCUM SKIMMER o L 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 3,182.0( 0- Freight Q 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 409.1- N 10.5% Sales Tax N 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 377.0 1 o Total : 3,968.1f c U) PROF SERV. CASCADIA - EDMONE E Prof Serv. Cascadia - Edmonds Citiz fd 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 U 437.5z Total: 437.5' E VEEAM BACK FOR MS OFFICE 365 Veeam Backup for MS Office 365 - Qi m r 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 7,080.5( Q 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 743.4E Total : 7,823.9E Page: 8 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 05/05/2022 10 :47 :23 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 9 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252297 5/5/2022 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 17670 WWTP: 2/2022 M/O+SEWER r 2/2022 M/O & SEWER c 423.000.75.535.80.47.20 42,307.0( �% Total: 42,307.0( a (D 252298 5/5/2022 077126 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 3244871 GASB 68 & 75 REPORTING ASSIST) 3 GASB 68 & 75 reporting assistance 009.000.39.517.20.41.00 6,704.2E Total : 6,704.2E Y U 252299 5/5/2022 076914 CM DESIGN GROUP LLC 22016 E20CB.SERVICES THRU3.31.22 a) E20CB.SERVICES THRU3.31.22 U 112.000.68.542.30.48.00 15,464.2E •9 Total: 15,464.2E Z 252300 5/5/2022 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO GCO0116677 STANDARD WEB HOSTING O Standard Web Hosting - Annual Web R o 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 480.0( a Total: 480.0( Q 252301 5/5/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310300732547 PUBLIC WRKS - DIGITAL CABLE N Public Works - 7110 210th S SW N 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.3, 9 Public Works - 7110 210th S SW o 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 11.1E E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 11.1E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 11.1E E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW t 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 10.6, r 8498310301175175 CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S� Q CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 143.9E 8498310301175191 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF Page: 9 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 10 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252301 5/5/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS (Continued) 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 143.9E 8498310301340308 UPTOWN CITY HALL - DIGITAL CAB Uptown City Hall - 23632 Highway 99 a 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 201.9E L Total : 536.25 '3 252302 5/5/2022 076829 CRYE PRECISION LLC IN00298638 CUST EP9802 - EDMONDS PD FIELD PANT - BORST SWAT 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 214.1( u FIELD SHIRT - BORST SWAT t 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 U 179.5( E FIELD KNEE PAD M 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 21.0( FIELD ELBOW PAD o 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 19.5( Freight o 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 43.0( a 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 50.1' N Total : 527.21 N LO 0 252303 5/5/2022 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3377356 E22CA.INVITATION TO BID 0 E22CA.INVITATION TO BID c 422.000.72.531.90.41.21 713.0( E Total: 713.0( fd U 252304 5/5/2022 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 508199 E6GB.SERVICES THRU 3.26.22 r- E6GB.SERVICES THRU 3.26.22 m E 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 163.3, u Total: 163.3, Q 252305 5/5/2022 076172 DK SYSTEMS 10639 PUBLIC SAFETY - INSTALLATION O PUBLIC SAFETY - INSTALLATION O 001.000.66.594.18.62.00 40,900.0( 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 10 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252305 5/5/2022 076172 DK SYSTEMS 252306 5/5/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.66.594.18.62.00 Tota I : 2977 PM: MULTI -MIX CONTAINER PM: MULTI -MIX CONTAINER 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 2978 PM: RECEIVER PIN, LUMBER, STOI PM: RECEIVER PIN, LUMBER, STOI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2992 PM: BATTERIES, SCREWDRIVER, 7 PM: BATTERIES, SCREWDRIVER, T 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2993 PM: PICKUP TOOL, PLANTING AUG PM: PICKUP TOOL, PLANTING AUG 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2996 PM: PIPE CUTTERS PM: PIPE CUTTERS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2997 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3005 PM: SPRAY PAINT PM: SPRAY PAINT 7.9.a Page: 11 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 12 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252306 5/5/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.9E 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.4, a 3008 PM: GARDEN SPRAYER, CABLE TIE L PM: GARDEN SPRAYER, CABLE TIE 3 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 106.1 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.1 , Y 3009 PM: KEYS U PM: KEYS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.1 E E 10.5% Sales Tax R 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.9E ,2 Total: 401.9: 0 252307 5/5/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 2-11650 9309 BOW DOIN WAY/ METER 7236 R 0 L 9309 BOW DOIN WAY/ METER 7236 a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 207.4( Q 2-25150 WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C N WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 56.3E o 2-25175 EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 C) c EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 C) N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 56.3E . 2-28275 PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 56.3E r- 2-37180 SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER £ E SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER E U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 81.6E 7-05276 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 Q CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 259.4( Total : 717.6: Page: 12 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252308 5/5/2022 075200 EDUARDO ZALDIBAR 252309 252310 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 69432 5/5/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR218034 AR218819 AR219233 PO # Description/Account INTERPRETER 2A0114330 INTERPRETER 2AO11430 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 Total : B/W - COLOR COPY CHARGE FOR B/W - Color copy charge for Planning 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 COLOR COPIER CHARGES A11617 Color copier charges for A11617 1 /21. 001.000.31.514.20.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.20.48.00 C250 OVERAGE APRIL bw overage 4/2022 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 clr overage 4/2022 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 Total 5/5/2022 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 312 000 093 ES REF # 94513310 7 Q4-21 Unemployment Claims 001.000.39.517.78.23.00 312000093 ES REF # 94513310 7 Q3-21 Unemployment Claims credit 001.000.39.517.78.23.00 312 000 093 ES REF # 94513310 7 01-22 Unemployment Claims 001.000.39.517.78.23.00 01-22 Unemployment Claims 111.000.68.542.60.23.10 7.9.a Page: 13 Amoun c 130.0( E, 130.0( a m L 3 6.71 0.7' u t U E 1.6' 0 R 0 L 2.8E Q 23.2' N N LO 2.7z o 53.2( c E 2 U 9.9' m E 120.9E U m Q 3,945.6< 674.8( Page: 13 Packet Pg. 110 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 14 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252310 5/5/2022 047407 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT (Continued) Total : 4,509.4: m 252311 5/5/2022 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 173630 E21 FC.SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 E E21 FC.SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 sa 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 a 2,832.5( m Total: 2,832.5( 3 252312 5/5/2022 076939 ESSENTRICALLY FIT LLC 10360 ESSENTRICS 10360 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI c 10360 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI N 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 99.0( l Total: 99.0( t U 252313 5/5/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH951821 E22CA.INVITATION TO BID E E22CA.INVITATION TO BID 2 422.000.72.531.90.41.21 278.6z o EDH952912 LEGAL DESCRIPT: HELGESON PLC Legal Descript: Helgeson PLN2022-0 0 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 60.2( a EDH952913 LEGAL DESCRIPT: PRICE PLN202, Legal Descript: Price PLN2022-0022 Q �- 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 60.2( N EDH953032 4254 ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 4254 G L0 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 25.8( EDH953211 4255, 4256 ORDINANCE N E 4255, 4256 Ordinance 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 37.8z Total: 462.6f m 252314 5/5/2022 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS NFalk April 2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES - NFALK E April 2022 Employee Claim for Expen m 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 42.3' Q Total: 42.3° 252315 5/5/2022 078226 GEIGLE SAFETY GROUP INC 220426-003C WWTP: DAWSON LAWRENCE - SAI DAWSON LAWRENCE - SAFETY CC 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 190.3' Page: 14 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 15 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252315 5/5/2022 078226 GEIGLE SAFETY GROUP INC (Continued) 220427-001C WWTP: DEVIN MCCLAMMA- SAFE- DEVIN MCCLAMMA - SAFETY COUF E 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 190.3- a Total: 380.6, L 3 252316 5/5/2022 012560 HACH COMPANY 12995607 WWTP: PO 713 AA KTO: REAGENT PO 713 AA KTO: REAGENT SET, CF 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1,987.4z Y 10.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 208.6E Total: 2,196.1, E 252317 5/5/2022 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 50759 E6FD.SERVICES THRU 4.1.22 R E6FD.SERVICES THRU 4.1.22 — 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 9,940.1E R Total : 9,940.1( o L Q 252318 5/5/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1015657 PM: FILTERS, WRENCH Q PM: FILTERS, WRENCH v 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 71.6( N 10.3% Sales Tax LO 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.31 L0 1021330 PM: CHISEL KIT, GROUT SAWS, SC o PM: CHISEL KIT, GROUT SAWS, SC E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 239.4E .m 10.3% Sales Tax U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 24.6E 2025180 PM: SWITCHES, FOLDING KNIFE, F m E PM: SWITCHES, FOLDING KNIFE, F 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 104.6, 10.3% Sales Tax Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.7E 2621150 PM: WING NUT TEST PLUGS PM: WING NUT TEST PLUGS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 35.3, Page: 15 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252318 5/5/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 16 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 10.3% Sales Tax c E, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.6 3021100 PM: CAULK, PRESSURE TEST GAU f° a 10.3% Sales Tax L 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.3- .3 PM: CAULK, PRESSURE TEST GAU 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 139.0� 3026413 PM: BASKET, CLEANERS, PARTS Y PM: BASKET, CLEANERS, PARTS U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 86.1 � 10.3% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 8.8E n 3622216 PM: PLANTS, SOIL 4- PM: PLANTS, SOIL O 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 539.3E > 10.3% Sales Tax o 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 55.5E a 5026097 PM: SHOVELS, STORAGE BIN Q PM: SHOVELS, STORAGE BIN N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 618.9( LO 10.3% Sales Tax c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 63.7.E o 5084320 PM: PLANTS, FAN SPRAYERS, PAR N PM: PLANTS, FAN SPRAYERS, PAR E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 209.8 � Z 10.3% Sales Tax +% 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 21.6, 5510021 PM: PARTS E PM: PARTS m 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.0E Q 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.4z 7011472 PM: LOCK PINS, PAINT PM: LOCK PINS, PAINT Page: 16 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252318 5/5/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7201487 PM: PAINT MIXER, PLANTS PM: PAINT MIXER, PLANTS 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 9021502 PM: RUST REMOVER, PICK SETS PM: RUST REMOVER, PICK SETS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9512673 PM: PARTS, PULL-UP TOOLS PM: PARTS, PULL-UP TOOLS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 252319 5/5/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1021324 WWTP: PO 736 FLASHLIGHTS, UTII O 736 FLASHLIGHTS, UTILITY KNIF 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 23784 WWTP: PO 736 1/2" PEX CLAMPS, I PO 736 1/2" PEX CLAMPS, PINCH 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 5970504 WWTP: PO 736 CONC SPY, TOTE, i PO 736 CONC SPY, TOTE, GAUG TI 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 6013895 WWTP: PO 736 SOCKET RAILS, BA PO 736 SOCKET RAILS, BAG W/TO1 7.9.a Page: 17 Amoun c 64.4E 6.61 a 3 126.3" �a 13.0- Y U m t U 62.3( E M 6.4, u 0 R 16.3� a a 1.6� Q 2,567.4c c,4 N LA 0 Ln 0 82.3E E 8.4£ TU m 21.2E E t U m 2.1 Q 51.8E Page: 17 Packet Pg. 114 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 18 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252319 5/5/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 89.8E 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.2E Tota I : 265.2: 252320 5/5/2022 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE BID-0422ED BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER APR BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER APR 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 2,766.E , Total : 2,766.E , 252321 5/5/2022 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG BID-ED2022-04 BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY APRIL 202 BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY APRIL 202 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.0( Total : 600.0( 252322 5/5/2022 072528 INTERCOM LANGUAGE SERVICES 68912 INTERPRETER 2A0190984 INTERPRETER 2A0190984 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 100.0( Tota I : 100.0( 252323 5/5/2022 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 6976 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC May-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 590.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 61.9E Total: 651.9° 252324 5/5/2022 078250 KAUFER DMC LLC 2641 BUSINESS BOOSTER WEB HOSTIN BUSINESS BOOSTER WEB HOSTIN 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 300.0( Total : 300.0( 252325 5/5/2022 078471 LEMM, KEVIN 10224 TAEKWON-DO 10224 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI` 10224 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI` 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 534.8( Page: 18 Packet Pg. 115 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 19 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252325 5/5/2022 078471 078471 LEMM, KEVIN (Continued) Total : 534.8( m 252326 5/5/2022 066064 LISTEN AUDIOLOGY SERVICE INC 6263 HEARING TESTS - PUBLIC WORKS E HEARING TESTS - 33 tested at PW sa 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 a 923.0( m 6271 HEARING TESTS - PUBLIC WORKS 3 HEARING TESTS - 12 tested at WW- 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 560.0( Total : 1,483.0( Y 252327 5/5/2022 074848 LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC 2022-1040 REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i U m t REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i U 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 434.0( 2022-1043 REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION o 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 201.0( R Total: 635.0( o L 252328 5/5/2022 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 5114068 PM SUPPLIES: OIL SEAL, AIR CLEA Q PM SUPPLIES: OIL SEAL, AIR CLEA �- 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.8- N 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.0£ 9 Total : 21.W 252329 5/5/2022 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 3131 CS 22-6974 - EDMONDS PD E TOW GOLD KIA - CS 22-6974 z 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 208.0( 10.5% Sales Tax aD 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 21.8z t 4066 CS 22-6822 - EDMONDS PD TOW GREEN SUBARU - CS 22-682' Q 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 208.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 21.81 4212 CS 22-7536 - EDMONDS PD Page: 19 Packet Pg. 116 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 20 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252329 5/5/2022 067235 MARYS TOWING INC (Continued) TOW SILVER ACURA - CS 22-7536 E, 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 208.0( 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 21.81 L 97769 UNIT 818 - TOW PATROL CAR- 3 UNIT 818 - TOW PATROL CAR- 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 c 75.0( Total : 764.5: Y U 252330 5/5/2022 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 76893993 WWTP: PO 826 IRON PIPE FITTING PO 826 IRON PIPE FITTINGS U E 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 59.5. Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.7- O 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 7.3E o 76909510 WWTP: PIPE NIPPLES, IRON PIPE a PIPE NIPPLES, IRON PIPE FITTING Q 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 177.6, N Freight N 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 13.7E o 10.5% Sales Tax c 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 20.0E 77309827 WWTP: PO 829 PIPE FITTINGS E PO 829 PIPE FITTINGS fd U 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 41.2E ; Freight (D 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.2, E 10.5% Sales Tax m 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 5.4( Total : 345.91, Q 252331 5/5/2022 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA 10388 10392 10388 10392 FELDENKRAIS INSTRI 10388 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 42.9( Page: 20 Packet Pg. 117 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 21 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252331 5/5/2022 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA (Continued) 10392 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 21.4E Total: 64.3E 252332 5/5/2022 074322 MICRO PRECISION CALIBRATION STL-64485 WATER QUALITY - CALIBRATION WATER QUALITY - CALIBRATION 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 70.0( Freight 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 4.0( Total : 74.0( 252333 5/5/2022 074831 MILLER PAINT COMPANY 33224188 PM: PAINT PM: PAINT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 39.6E 10.6% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.2' Total : 43.8E 252334 5/5/2022 072746 MURRAYSMITH INC 20-2775.00-15 EOGA.SERVICES THRU 10.31.21 EOGA.SERVICES THRU 10.31.21 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 1,329.5( 20-2775.01-12 E21 GA.SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 E21GA.SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 20,277.6, Total : 21,607.1: 252335 5/5/2022 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0650524-IN WWTP: PO 808 SENSIS VENTIS PO 808 SENSIS VENTIS 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 211.5E Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 16.8E 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 23.9� Total : 252.4E Page: 21 Packet Pg. 118 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 22 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252336 5/5/2022 075872 NELSON, DENISE DNelson April 2022 EMPLOYEE EXPENSE REIMB WSAPT Spring 2022 Conference d E, 001.000.62.524.20.43.00 599.2£ Total: 599.2f a m 252337 5/5/2022 078847 NEWNUM, BETSY 10384 YOGA 10384 YOGA INSTRUCTION 3 10384 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 85.8( Total : 85.8( Y U 252338 5/5/2022 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS N041762 PM: HOSES, CLAMPS t PM: HOSES, CLAMPS U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 221.1 E •9 9.9% Sales Tax z 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 21.9E p N042262 WWTP: PO 828 SUCTION HOSES R PO 828 SUCTION HOSES - picked u o 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 103.0( a 9.9% Sales Tax Q' Q 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.2( Total: 356.2E N 252339 5/5/2022 077808 OSBORN CONSULTING INC 7069 E21 FD.SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 G LO E21 FD.SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 24,494.3z E Total : 24,494.3' .R z 252340 5/5/2022 002203 OW EN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00105901 UNIT 47 - PARTS/ HOSE, HOSE ENE UNIT 47 - PARTS/ HOSE, HOSE ENE m 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1,196.7, 10.1 % Sales Tax m r 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 120.8 1 Q 00105995 UNIT 66 - PARTS/ BEARING PARTS UNIT 66 - PARTS/ BEARING PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 71.3� Freight Page: 22 Packet Pg. 119 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 23 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252340 5/5/2022 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 26.2' 10.5% Sales Tax E E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.2( a Total: 1,425.41, L 3 252341 5/5/2022 069873 PAPE MACHINERY INC 13464095 PARK MAINT: SWITCH, STARTER, E PARK MAINT: SWITCH, STARTER, E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 530.3E Y 10.5% Sales Tax U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 55.6� 13464197 PARK MAINT: FREIGHT CHARGES I E Freight M 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 37.5( 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.9, 13464213 PARK MAINT: PIN, FLAP o PARK MAINT: PIN, FLAP a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 250.1 £ Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 26.21 N 13468667 PARK MAINT: PIN FASTENERS o PARK MAINT: PIN FASTENERS c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.21 9.3% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.5£ TU Total : 910.7E 252342 5/5/2022 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 34753 WWTP: THRU 4/2/22 DESIGN SERV E THRU 4/2/22 DESIGN SERVICES U 423.100.76.594.35.41.00 1,711.2E 34754 WWTP: THRU 4/2/22 CONSTRUCTI( Q THRU 4/2/22 CONSTRUCTION SER` 423.100.76.594.35.41.00 6,330.0( Total : 8,041.2E Page: 23 Packet Pg. 120 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252343 5/5/2022 027450 PAWS 252344 252345 252346 252347 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice MARCH 2O22 MARCH2 2022 MARCH3 2022 5/5/2022 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT #ADB040622 5/5/2022 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5/5/2022 078800 POPA & ASSOCIATES #PB041222 #TB040722 2550163 4 5/5/2022 076317 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING ASSOC 3501-529-1-cbe0 PO # Description/Account MARCH 22 - EDMONDS PD MARCH 2O22 ANIMAL SHELTERING 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 MARCH2 2022 - EDMONDS PD SHAMROCK - SHELTERING 19 DAY 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 MARCH 3 2022 - EDMONDS PD REESE - SHELTERING 19 DAYS 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Total ADB MINUTES 4/6/22 ADB Minutes 4/6/22 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 4/13/2 Planning Board Minutes 4/13/22 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 TREE BOARD MINUTES (NOTES) 4i Tree Board Minutes (Notes) 4/7/2022 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total WWTP: PO 822 WALL BOXES, POU PO 822 WALL BOXES, POLY HANDL 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total BID/ED! COPYWRITING (MOTHER' BID/ED! COPYWRITING (MOTHER' 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total WWTP: JMCKENZIE - WKSHOPS-IN WKSHOPS-INTRO TO PUMPS & PF 7.9.a Page: 24 Amoun c 1,500.0( �% �a o: 590.0( .3 c �a 590.0( Y 2,680.0( t E 96.0( 0 M 180.0( o a a Q 192.0( N 468.0( N LO 0 LO 0 226.4- E 2 23.7 1 U 250.1 F E t U m r 600.0( Q 600.0( Page: 24 Packet Pg. 121 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252347 5/5/2022 076317 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING ASSOC (Continued) 252348 5/5/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 200007876143 200009595790 200011439656 200016558856 200016815843 200017676343 200019375639 200019895354 200020415911 PO # Description/Account 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 Total : FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 7.9.a Page: 25 Amoun c 200.0( 200.0( �a a a� L 3 1,863.8- c ea 333.3E u t U 710.6E •ii U 0 267.3' i 0 L a a 170.7- Q N N 766.5E o 0 0 U) 604.2E E .R U 260.6E E t U 267.9z El 54.3� 206.6� Page: 25 Packet Pg. 122 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 26 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252348 5/5/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; m 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 206.6� >, PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; a 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 206.6� L PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 3 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 206.6� PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; ea 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 206.7( Y 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 365.5, E Total : 6,698.7; .� U 252349 5/5/2022 075770 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 7900 0440 8030 3286 POSTAGE o Postage 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 4,000.0( o Total: 4,000.0( a Q 252350 5/5/2022 075769 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC N9379701 MAIL POSTAGE LEASE CHARGES E Mail postage lease charges 5/23/22 - N 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 1,985.2, o 10.5% Sales Tax Ln 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 0 208.4E N Total: 2,193.7( .E R 252351 5/5/2022 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 40673 MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HOFFER U MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HOFFER 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 216.0( E Total: 216.0( u m 252352 5/5/2022 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 159014 CS22-220 - EDMONDS PD r Q TOW BLUE TOYOTA - CS 22-220 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 184.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 19.3, Page: 26 Packet Pg. 123 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 27 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252352 5/5/2022 070955 070955 R&R STAR TOWING (Continued) Total : 203.3: m 252353 5/5/2022 068708 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC INV53851 WWTP: 4/10/22-4/9/23 16 FIIX LICEP E 4/10/22-4/9/23 16 FIIX LICENSES sa 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 a 14,352.0( m 10.5% Sales Tax 3 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 1,506.9E Total: 15,858.9E 252354 5/5/2022 078857 S P KINNEY ENGINEERS INC 24118V WWTP: STRAINER & PARTS 1k STRAINER & PARTS t 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 7,037.0( U Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 325.0( Z Total: 7,362.0E o 252355 5/5/2022 036955 SKY NURSERY T-1977145 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM SOIL > PM: FLOWER PROGRAM soil a 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 29.0( Q 10.3% Sales Tax �- 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 2.9� N T-1988231 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS LO PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 9 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 175.9, 10.3% Sales Tax E 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 18.11 .� T-1988248 PM: MULCH PM: MULCH 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 550.0( E 10.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 57.7E Total : 833.71 Q 252356 5/5/2022 078782 SMITH FIRE SYSTEMS INC 60374 WWTP: 2022 WET SPRINKLER INSI 2022 WET SPRINKLER INSPECTIO 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 539.0( Page: 27 Packet Pg. 124 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252356 5/5/2022 078782 078782 SMITH FIRE SYSTEMS INC 252357 5/5/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 28 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total: 539.0( m 200260271 YOST POOL E YOST POOL sa 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,336.6, a m 200274959 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W 3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 22.5E 200386456 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE Y CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE U 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 82.& t 200468593 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / U E LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 268.2E 200493146 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M o MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 22.7- o 200638609 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON L a OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON Q 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 304.0, 200748606 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW N TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW LO 0 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 20.9, <n 200943348 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V N TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 51.1 , 12 201192226 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W m 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 21.0( E 201197084 SEAVIEW PARK t SEAVIEW PARK f° 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 27.3E Q 201236825 FISHING PIER RESTROOMS FISHING PIER RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 214.2E 201265980 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL Page: 28 Packet Pg. 125 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252357 5/5/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 29 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL c m 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 153.5z >, 201327111 PINE ST PARK f° a PINE ST PARK L '3 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 20.4' 201374964 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P ca 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 23.8E Y 201572898 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME U TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 43.1' E 201582152 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W M TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 33.9( 201594488 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S _0 > LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S o 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 21.3( a 201611951 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W Q TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W N 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 35.3E 201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! o DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! c 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 310.7, N 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / E TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / l\ 2 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 21.7z +: 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW (D TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 32.1' m 202077194 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE Q 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 568.8z 202087870 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 153.5, Page: 29 Packet Pg. 126 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 30 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252357 5/5/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 202250627 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 19.7, a 202289096 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME L TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME 3 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 64.1 E 202289120 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME Y 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 61.4' y 202421582 LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI E 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 131.21 'R 202620415 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA O 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 20.7E > 204467435 HAZEL MILLER PLAZA o HAZEL MILLER PLAZA a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 26.0' Q 220547582 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE N TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE N 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 41.9" c 220792758 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME 0 0 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 84.3E . 222704264 WWTP: 3/24-4/21/22 FLOWMETER , 3/24-4/21/22 FLOW METER 23219 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 20.9, (D Total: 4,266.7( E U 252358 5/5/2022 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 4600 MAY-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA f° MAY-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA Q 001.000.39.528.00.41.50 76,390.8E MAY-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 2,010.2E MAY-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA Page: 30 Packet Pg. 127 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 31 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252358 5/5/2022 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 (Continued) 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 2,010.2E Total: 80,411.4: E, �a a 252359 5/5/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N m CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 3 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 717.7z 103584 WWTP: 4/2022 RECYCLING INV 29( 4/2022 Recycling + taxes Y 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 38.7. u 103585 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( t FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 U 704.5E •ii 103586 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST U SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST o 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 605.1 £ 1i 103588 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N o CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N L a 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 459.8� Q 201159 WWTP: 4/2022 ACCT #201159 GAR N 4/2022 GARBAGE ACCT. 201159 N 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 147.4, c Total: 2,673.5E c 252360 5/5/2022 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 127299/4 WWTP: RICK BAGAN - 2022 RAING E RICK BAGAN - 2022 RAINGEAR - U M 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 88.4' U 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 9.2E E Total: 97.7: u m 252361 5/5/2022 073621 TANIMURA, NAOAKI 10204 10205 KENDO 10204 10205 KENDO CLASS INSTR r Q 10204 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTIO 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 1,178.1( 10205 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTIO 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 458.1 £ Page: 31 Packet Pg. 128 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252361 5/5/2022 073621 073621 TANIMURA, NAOAKI 252362 5/5/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 32 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total: 1,636.2E m 9904781725 C/A 571242650-0001 E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bldg a 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 640.8z m iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 3 001.000.31.514.31.42.00 36.3z iPhone/iPad Cell Service Comm Svc �a 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 140.7' Y iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council U 001.000.11.511.60.35.00 397.7� iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council E 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 M iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court 001.000.23.512.51.42.00 313.7E O iPhone/iPad Cell Service Dev Svcs > 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 271.4, o iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering a 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 1,473.4 � Q iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 413.5' N iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance o 001.000.31.514.20.42.00 36.3, c iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 76.6E •� iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 141.0E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Human Sen CD 001.000.63.557.20.42.00 50.3E iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS U 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 m 323.4' Q iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 100.7( iPhone/iPad Cell Service Park Admin 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 50.3E Page: 32 Packet Pg. 129 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252362 5/5/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 33 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Maint c E, 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 436.8( iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Rec f° a 001.000.64.571.22.42.00 233.5" L iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD 3 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 2,842.51' Air cards PD 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 1,200.3( Y iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 382.1 , U iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street E 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 166.7' R iPhone/iPad Cell Service Fleet - 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 50.3E o iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/SeWe to 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 95.5< o iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/Sewe a 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 95.5< Q iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer N 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 N 300.7E LO iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water e 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 LO 537.1 o iPhone/iPad Cell Service Storm E 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 156.3; 'M iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn z 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 314.9, -�r; iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn °' t 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 314.9z iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn r 111.000.68.542.90.35.00 397.7� Q iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn 422.000.72.531.90.35.00 397.7� iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 661.1( Page: 33 Packet Pg. 130 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252362 5/5/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 252363 252364 252365 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 9904923352 5/5/2022 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION 4-2022 5/5/2022 075283 WAVE 5/5/2022 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 3201-1027483-01 12742973 7.9.a Page: 34 PO # Description/Account Amoun c iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Disco m 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 225.6- >, C/A 772540262-00001 f° a Cradlepoint 1 - IT L 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 100.0- .3 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 421.000.74.534.80.49.20 3.3" Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm Y 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 3.3- (D Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm U 423.000.75.535.80.49.20 3.4( E Trimble 1 - Storm 6 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 10.01 ,- Lake Ballinger monitor O 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 31.4< Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 17.0E a Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te Q 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 17.0< N Total : N 14,241.6: LO 0 PMT 10 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC c PMT 10 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 34,049.7, •� PMT 10 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC z 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 3,404.9E Total: 37,454.7° E FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF U High Speed Internet service 05/01/22 f° 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 816.0( Q Total : 816.0( PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES Page: 34 Packet Pg. 131 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.a Page: 35 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252365 5/5/2022 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2,762.4( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 290.0E 12742974 PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 745.2( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 78.2E Total : 3,875.9( 252366 5/5/2022 078768 WEAPON OUTFITTERS 1247-INV EDMONDS PD - SWAT AIMPOINT T-2 RED DOT SIGHT 001.000.41.521.23.35.00 664.7( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.35.00 69.7� Total : 734.4< 252367 5/5/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 8167 DESK ASSEMBLY DESK ASSEMBLY 001.000.23.512.51.49.00 400.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.51.49.00 42.0( Tota I : 442.0( 252368 5/5/2022 071467 WEST COAST PET MEMORIAL WA70014-1-0056 APRIL 2022 - EDMONDS PD DISPOSAL OF 2 ANIMAL REMAINS 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 32.0( Tota I : 32.0( 252369 5/5/2022 063008 WSDOT RE 41 JZ0605 L012 GATEWAY SIGN RELOCATION PLAI GATEWAY SIGN RELOCATION PLAT 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 80.4' Total : 80.4' 252370 5/5/2022 078807 ZACHOR STOCK & KREPPS INC PS 22-EDM-0004 APR-2022 RETAINER Page: 35 Packet Pg. 132 vchlist 05/05/2022 10:47:23AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252370 5/5/2022 078807 ZACHOR STOCK & KREPPS INC PS (Continued) 252371 5/5/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 94 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 94 Vouchers in this report PO # Description/Account Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.41.41.20 Total ; 253-012-9189 WWTP: 4/25-5/24/22 AUTO DIALER 4/25-5/24/22 AUTO DIALER - 1 VOI( 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-771-5553 WWTP: 4/25-5/24/22 AUTO DIALER: 4/25-5/24/22 AUTO DIALER - 1 BUSI 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers 7.9.a Page: 36 Amoun c 23,625.0( �% 23,625.0( a m L 3 41.6" U m 137.4� E M 126.E , 0 �a 137.4� o a a El 26.4E N 469.71 N LO 0 467,495.8E LO 0 467,495.8E E M U m E t U m r El Page: 36 Packet Pg. 133 7.9.b vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252372 5/12/2022 041695 3M XAM3522 252373 5/12/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Page 0 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun r c 9416279295 TRAFFIC - YELLOW REFLECTIVE S TRAFFIC - YELLOW REFLECTIVE S >, 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 449.8E a 10.5% Sales Tax L_ 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 47.2z 3 Total: 497.1( �a INV-2-16739 EDMONDS PD - MCINTYRE Y TACTICAL PANTS U 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 64.9� u 10.1 % Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 6.5( 'M INV-2-18153 EDMONDS PD - INVENTORY KNIT C KNIT CAPS - NAVY O 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 104.8E > CUSTOM EDMONDS PD EMBROIDE o L 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 120.0( Q 10.1 % Sales Tax Q 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 22.7' N INV-2-18154 EDMONDS PD - ALERT N STREAMLIGHT TLR 1 HL LIGHTS 04 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 586.0( c 10.1 % Sales Tax N 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 59.1E •� INV-2-18158 EDMONDS PD - CLERKS 3 EDDIE BAUER FLEECE JACKETS +: 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 171.0( (D CUSTOM EMBROIDERY X 5 E t 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 40.0( m PATCH INSTALL X 5 Q 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 20.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 23.3' INV-2-18378 EDMONDS PD - LEEN Page: 1 Packet Pg. 134 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252373 5/12/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 252374 5/12/2022 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL 252375 5/12/2022 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 252376 5/12/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r JUMPSUIT W/ALTERATIONS c 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 522.2,>, 10.1 % Sales Tax a 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 52.7E L Total: 1,793.6E .3 2010551 ALARM MONITORING MEADOWDAI ea ALARM MONITORING CLUBHOUSE Y 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 205.8( u FIRE INSPECTION AND MONITORI� 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 68.8E E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 _M 21.6" Total: 296.25 0 10968 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- Ta 0 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF a 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 137,288.0( Q Total : 137,288.0( N N 050222035 FINANCE DEPT WATER N Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 56.5( N 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 5.9' .2 050222036 WWTP: 5/2/22 ACCT: COEWASTE: U Acct COEWaste:- 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 38.0( E 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 3.9� 050322024 PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE Q PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 22.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 2.3E Page: 2 Packet Pg. 135 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252376 5/12/2022 065568 065568 ALLWATER INC 252377 5/12/2022 073573 ANIXTER 252378 5/12/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total: 129.2F m 23K298442 NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - St E NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - Sl sa 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 a 484.8� m 10.5% Sales Tax 3 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 50.9- Total: 535.8( 656000231699 WWTP: UNIFORMS,TOWELS+MATS 1k Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 t 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 52.5E U Rentals & Prep Charges $42.85 + $4. E 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 48.2E Z 10.5% Sales Tax o 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 5.5, R 10.5% Sales Tax o 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 5.0, a 656000231719 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS Q FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9" N 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9< <n 656000233499 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS E 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6- fd PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS U 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1- PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS E 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1- U PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS f° 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1- Q PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0E Page: 3 Packet Pg. 136 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252378 5/12/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6z >, 10.5% Sales Tax a 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6z L 10.5% Sales Tax 3 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6z c 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6z Y 10.5% Sales Tax W 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.6E U 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.1; R 656000233507 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT ,- FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS O 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� > FLEET DIVISION MATS o L 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.6z a 10.5% Sales Tax Q 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.6( N 10.5% Sales Tax N N 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.4E 7 Total : 209.7E c U) 252379 5/12/2022 071174 AXON ENTERPRISE INC INUS035349 EDMONDS PD - GREENMUN E CLASS 2 UAS AIR LICENSE U 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 13,392.0( CLASS 1 UAS AIR LICENSE W 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 8,016.0( t 10.4% Sales Tax m 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 2,226.4, Q Total : 23,634.4; 252380 5/12/2022 075941 BELL, LAURIE 10259 ZENTANGLE 10259 ZENTANGLE CLASS INSTRU, 10259 ZENTANGLE CLASS INSTRU, 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 44.0( Page: 4 Packet Pg. 137 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252380 5/12/2022 075941 075941 BELL, LAURIE (Continued) Total : 44.0( 252381 5/12/2022 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 818515 UNIT 438 - PARTS/ BUCKLE UNIT 438 - PARTS/ BUCKLE 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 101.9z 10.25% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4E Total : 112.35 252382 5/12/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 1331903 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 503.80 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 503.80 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,465.4( Tota I : 1,465.4E 252383 5/12/2022 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 5830494 ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT I ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT 1 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 269.8, Tota I : 269.8 , 252384 5/12/2022 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 95427869 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA, DARASE- STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA, DARASE- 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 683.3E 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 69.0' Total: 752.3f 252385 5/12/2022 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 10181 10189 ART 10181 10189 ADVENTURES IN ART 10181 ADVENTURES IN ART INSTR 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 631.4( 10189 ADVENTURES IN ART INSTR 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 523.1 E Total : 1,154.5E 252386 5/12/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC V515733 SURFACE PRO 8 Surface Pro 8 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 1,397.1, 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 5 Packet Pg. 138 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252386 5/12/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 252387 5/12/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 252388 5/12/2022 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 252389 5/12/2022 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 252390 5/12/2022 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 6 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 c 146.7( V5235211 MS SURFACE PRO WARRANTY E Surface Pro 8 warranty a 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 440.0( L 10.5% Sales Tax 3 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 46.2E c W056749 ADOBE ACROBAT PRO DC sa Adobe Acrobat Pro DC - Qty 10 Y 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 1,854.9( u 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 194.7E E Total: 4,079X 'R U RN04221000 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL p YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL R 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 63.0( o L 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 6.6, Q Total : 69.6: N N 122002756 WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS N WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS ui 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,623.6( N Total : 1,623.6( E .R MAY-2022 C/A CITYOFED00001 U May-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 661.5E E Total: 661.55 m 3377439 E20CE/INVITATION TO BID Q E20CE/INVITATION TO BID 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 1,069.5( 3377721 WWTP: LEGAL AD FOR PUMP & EN LEGAL AD FOR PUMP & ENERG Mi Page: 6 Packet Pg. 139 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 7 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252390 5/12/2022 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.41.40 253.0( 3377735 E21JA/INVITATION TO BID E21JA/INVITATION TO BID f° a 421.000.74.594.34.41.00 272.9: L E21GA/INVITATION TO BID 3 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 272.9: E21 FD/INVITATION TO BID 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 272.9, Y Total: 2,141.3( u t 252391 5/12/2022 068190 DATEC INC 35385 PANASONIC FZ-55 TOUGHBOOKS Panasonic FZ-55 Toughbooks w/5 yr 001.000.41.594.21.64.00 17,224.6( Desktop Docking Station- o 001.000.41.594.21.64.00 1,065.0( 10.5% Sales Tax o L 001.000.41.594.21.64.00 1,920.4( 0- Total : 20,210.0( Q 252392 5/12/2022 078912 DAWKINS, LOI APRIL 2022 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT - DAWKIN; cN.� FUEL REIMURSEMENT - DAWKINS N 001.000.41.521.10.45.10 20.0( �n Total: 20.0( N E 252393 5/12/2022 069479 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PWTF-253991 LOAN #PW-02-691-019 M Pr Pmt CTED 2002 Sanitary Sewer S U 423.000.75.591.35.78.61 36,450.0( Pr Pmt CTED 2002 Sanitary Sewer S °' E 423.100.76.591.39.78.61 34,875.0( Int Pmt CTED 2002 Sanitary Sewer S r 423.000.75.592.35.83.61 182.2E Q Int Pmt CTED 2002 Sanitary Sewer S 423.100.76.592.35.83.61 174.3£ PWTF-255418 LOAN #PW-04-691-030 Pr Pmt CTED Stormwater Outfall Imp Page: 7 Packet Pg. 140 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252393 5/12/2022 069479 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (Continued) PWTF-257657 PWTF-258221 PWTF-259346 PWTF-266237 PWTF-266249 252394 5/12/2022 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 9982 7.9.b Page: 8 PO # Description/Account Amoun c 422.000.72.591.31.78.64 32,062.5( Int Pmt CTED Stormwater Outfall Imp E >, 422.000.72.592.31.83.64 480.9, a LOAN #PW-04-691-029 L Pr Pmt CTED 220th St SW Improvem 3 112.506.68.591.95.78.63 21,176.4, Int Pmt CTED 220th St SW Improvers sa 112.506.68.592.95.83.63 317.6E Y LOAN #PW-04-691-031 U Pr Pmt CTED 5 Corner Pump Station 421.000.74.591.34.78.65 25,838.9E E Int Pmt CTED 5 Corner Pump Station R 421.000.74.592.34.83.65 387.5E u LOAN #PW-02-691 -PRE-1 23 Pr Pmt CTED 220th St SW Improvem _0 > 112.506.68.591.95.78.62 18,143.2, o Int Pmt CTED 220th St SW Improvers a 112.506.68.592.95.83.62 90.7, Q LOAN #PW-06-962-012 N Pr Pmt CTED 100th Ave W Stabilizati N 112.000.68.591.95.78.67 32,881.5E - Int Pmt CTED 100th Ave W Stabilizat 0 112.000.68.592.95.83.67 822.0z LOAN #PW-05-691-015 E Pr Pmt CTED 2005 Sewer Lift Station 423.000.75.591.35.78.66 72,295.2- Int Pmt CTED 2005 Sewer Lift Statior W 423.000.75.592.35.83.66 1,445.9( E Total: 277,624.4E m r 9982 - EDMONDS PD - HAUGHIAN ; Q EXPLOSIVE LICENSE - HAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.23.49.00 50.0( Total : 50.0( Page: 8 Packet Pg. 141 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 9 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252395 5/12/2022 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 22-4160 CITY COUNCIL MTG, SPECIAL CITY Special City Council Mtg Minutes d 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 1,180.8( �% Total: 1,180.8( a m 252396 5/12/2022 076172 DK SYSTEMS 31503 PUBLIC SAFETY - LABOR FOR BOII 3 PUBLIC SAFETY - LABOR FOR BOII 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 375.0( 10.5% Sales Tax Y 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 39.3E u Total: 414.3F 252397 5/12/2022 007253 DUNN LUMBER 8628093 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ LUME E PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ LUME U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 96.1 o 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.9( o 8642124 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES/ SCREWS a FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES/ SCREWS Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.3E 10.3% Sales Tax N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.1 , 8654732 YOST - SUPPLIES/ SCREWS, GLUE c YOST - SUPPLIES/ SCREWS, GLUE N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 151.0( E 10.6% Sales Tax fd 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 U 16.0- 8655913 YOST - SUPPLIES/ WOOD & BRASr YOST - SUPPLIES/ WOOD & BRASr E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 51.9( U 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.31 Q Tota I : 363.7' 252398 5/12/2022 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 00010124957 PM SUPPLIES: VALVE SNAP PM SUPPLIES: VALVE SNAP Page: 9 Packet Pg. 142 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252398 5/12/2022 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 252399 5/12/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 10 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.1( c 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.2; a 00010125198 M-16 - PARTS/ V-BELT L M-16 - PARTS/ V-BELT 3 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 44.2E c 10.5% Sales Tax M 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.6,1 Y Total: 51.3( u t 3007 PM: BATTERIES E PM: BATTERIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 23.9E 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.5, > 3011 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ CLEA o L PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ CLEA 0. a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.5E Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.7z N 3012 PM: PARTS, PUTTY KNIFE N PM: PARTS, PUTTY KNIFE c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 29.1 E 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.0E TU 3015 PM: PRIMER, PAINT ROLLER PM: VINYL TUBING, PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 36.5E E STATE PAINTCARE FEE m 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.9E 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.8z 3016 PM: VINYL TUBING, PARTS PM: VINYL TUBING, PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 15.4E Page: 10 Packet Pg. 143 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 11 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252399 5/12/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.6 >, 3017 WATER - SUPPLIES/ TOTE f° a WATER - SUPPLIES/ TOTE L .3 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 27.9£ 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 c 2.91 3020 PM: CAULK, GROUT REMOVAL TOC Y PM: CAULK, GROUT REMOVAL TOC y 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 27.5£ 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.9( n 3022 PM: HOOK, NUTS, BOLTS U PM: HOOK, NUTS, BOLTS O 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 57.1E > 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.0( a 3024 PM: PARTS Q PM: PARTS C%4 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.5£ N 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.5� o 3026 PM: VINYL TUBING, SAFETY GLAS; PM: VINYL TUBING, SAFETY GLAS',: E 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 18.8� Z 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 1.9£ 3028 PM: HOSES, WIRE FENCING E PM: HOSES, WIRE FENCING m 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 335.9- Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 35.2 3031 PM: LEADER HOSE PM: LEADER HOSE Page: 11 Packet Pg. 144 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252399 5/12/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 3041 252400 5/12/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR217635 7.9.b Page: 12 PO # Description/Account Amoun c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.9� 10.5% Sales Tax E E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.3( a YOST POOL - PARTS/ NUTS, BOLTS L YOST POOL - PARTS/ NUTS, BOLTS 3 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 50.91 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.3E Y Total: 728.9E t MK5610 PUBLIC WORKS USAGE PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 3/19/22 - 4 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 21.9( PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 3/19/22 - 4 0 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 12.4( R PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 3/19/22 - 4 0 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 12.4( 0- PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 3/19/22 - 4 Q 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 8.7E N PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 3/19/22 - 4 N 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 8.7E 04 PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 3/19/22 - 4 0 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.7E 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.3( 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 1.3( (D 10.5% Sales Tax E t 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 1.3( 10.5% Sales Tax Q 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0.91 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.91 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 12 Packet Pg. 145 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252400 5/12/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) AR218033 AR218035 AR219011 AR219092 PO # Description/Account 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 MK5533 FLEET COPIER USAGE FLEET COPIER USAGE - 3/19/22 - 4 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 COPIER B/W COLOR USAGE B/W and Color Copier Usage for Cou 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 C165 CONTRACT CHARGES MK551 Contract overage charge 4/01/2022 - 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 COPIER LEASE- DEV SVCS Dev Svcs Copier (SN 3AP01472)- 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total 252401 5/12/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH951625 E20CE/INVITATION TO BID E20CE/INVITATION TO BID 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 EDH952744 INVITATION TO BID E21JA/INVITATION TO BID 421.000.74.594.34.41.00 E21GA/INVITATION TO BID 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 E21 FD/INVITATION TO BID 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 EDH953010 WWTP: 4/22-4/23/22 LEGAL AD FOI 4/22-4/23/22 LEGAL AD FOR PUMP 7.9.b Page: 13 Amoun c 0.91 �a a 31.3, L 3 3.2� 21.3E y t 2.2z E M v 390.5E O R 41.0- a a Q LO- 104.3' c%4 N N 10.9E 685.7 , c E 2 U 392.1 E (D E 114.6, L) m Page: 13 Packet Pg. 146 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 14 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252401 5/12/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.41.40 96.3, EDH953493 4257 ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 4257 f° a 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 24.0E L EDH953600 PUBLIC HEARING 3 6-Yr Transportation Improvement Pro 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 51.6( EDH953803 PLANNING -ADVERTISING Y Notice of City Application- U 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 72.2z u EDH953845 PLANNING - LEGALAD E Notice of City Application- 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 _M 77.4( Total: 1,057.8( O 252402 5/12/2022 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1098615 WATER - 3" METER FOR 21200 72N R o WATER - 3" METER FOR 21200 72N L a 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 a 2,061.7' Q 10.5% Sales Tax v 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 N 216.4E N Total: 2,278.21 6 252403 5/12/2022 074358 GEO-TEST SERVICES 48460 EOFB/SERVICES THRU4.30.22 EOFB/SERVICES THRU4.30.22 E 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 2,503.4( 12 Total: 2,503.4( 252404 5/12/2022 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 0000033316 FLEET - TIRES m FLEET - TIRES 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 U 803.1( tea, WA STATE TIRE FEE Q 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 5.0( 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 85.1: 0000033423 FLEET - TIRES Page: 14 Packet Pg. 147 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252404 5/12/2022 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER (Continued) FLEET - TIRES 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 WA STATE TIRE FEE 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 Total: 252405 5/12/2022 012199 GRAINGER 9282108779 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ V-BEI PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ V-BEI 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9282336875 WATER - SUPPLIES/ SHACKLE WATER - SUPPLIES/ SHACKLE 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9282357772 WATER - SUPPLIES/ PLIERS WATER - SUPPLIES/ PLIERS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9284801140 PUBLIC SAFETY - COUPLER PUMP PUBLIC SAFETY - COUPLER PUMP 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9292388809 PUBLIC SAFETY - COUPLER PUMP PUBLIC SAFETY - COUPLER PUMP 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total: 7.9.b Page: 15 Amoun c 764.5E >, �a a 5.0( L 3 81.01 1,743.8, U m t U 65.5E E 6.8£ 0 2.4E Q N N 04 103.8E 0 10.9, 2 U 95.9, m 10.01 E U m 40.1 £ Q 4.2- 363.4: Page: 15 Packet Pg. 148 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252406 5/12/2022 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 252407 5/12/2022 012560 HACH COMPANY 252408 5/12/2022 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 252409 5/12/2022 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 16 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 1241787 OLD PW - SECURITY r OLD PW - SECURITY c d E, 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 55.0( 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 5.7E L Total: 60.7f 3 13007080 WATER QUALITY - SUPPLIES ea WATER QUALITY - SUPPLIES Y 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 133.2E u Freight U 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 110.9' E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 _M 25.6, 13012871 WATER QUALITY - SUPPLIES O WATER QUALITY - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 264.9E o 10.5% Sales Tax a 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 27.8, Q Total : 562.6( N N 16070122 WATER - SUPPLIES/ PLASTIC PLU( 04 WATER - SUPPLIES/ PLASTIC PLU( ui 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0 72.6( N 10.5% Sales Tax E 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 7.6, 2 Total : 80.2: 2019-320 TOURISM PROMOTION & MARKETI E TOURISM PROMOTION & MARKETI U 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 2,851.6, Total: 2,851.61, Q 252410 5/12/2022 078923 HKA GLOBAL INC 0000001 WWTP: 3/1-3/31/22 PROF. SERVICE 3/1-3/31/22 PROF. SERVICES FOR ( 423.100.76.594.35.41.00 22,860.0( Page: 16 Packet Pg. 149 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252410 5/12/2022 078923 078923 HKA GLOBAL INC 252411 5/12/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 0552722352 0552730439 252412 5/12/2022 076614 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SNO CO 644979 252413 5/12/2022 062899 HUFF, ARIELE 252414 5/12/2022 075265 KBA INC 252415 5/12/2022 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 252416 5/12/2022 078898 LANG, LIAM 10252 WRITE 3006607 083716 4/5-4/26 GYM MONITOR PO # Description/Account Total ; FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total PLANNING - PROF SVCS AHA Assessment - FY23 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total : 10252 WRITE ABOUT YOUR LIFE O 10252 WRITE ABOUT YOUR LIFE O 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total EOMA/SERVICES THRU4.30.22 EOMA/SERVICES THRU4.30.22 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 EOMA/SERVICES THRU4.30.22 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 Total HI-VIS VEST FOR RUSSELL LYNCH HI-VIS VEST FOR RUSSELL LYNCH 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 Total 4/5-4/26/22 PICKLEBALL LEAGUE G 4/5-4/26/22 PICKLEBALL LEAGUE G 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 7.9.b Page: 17 Amoun 22,860.0( m E �a a 240.3E m L 3 111.6E 352.0( Y U m t U 4,458.0( •E 4,458.0( u 4- 0 N N N 25,257.3( 0 7,544.4( 32,801.7: m 128.5( E U m 13.3 141.9( Q iu-1011( Page: 17 Packet Pg. 150 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252416 5/12/2022 078898 078898 LANG, LIAM 252417 5/12/2022 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 252418 5/12/2022 076177 MCKINSTRY LOCKBOX 252419 5/12/2022 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total 80500352938 UNIT 282 - WHEEL ALIGNMENT W/; UNIT 282 - WHEEL ALIGNMENT W/; 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Total 2020-157B(2) FACILITIES - CITYWIDE ENERGY U FACILITIES - CITYWIDE ENERGY U 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total 0795557-IN FLEET - FILTERS FLEET - FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 252420 5/12/2022 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 241399519001 252421 5/12/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER April, 2022 Total ; INV 241399519001 ACCT 90520437 PUBLIC WORKS - NAPKINS 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Total COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI• Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 Building Code Fee Account 7.9.b Page: 18 Amoun 180.0( d E �a a 129.9� m L 3 13.6.' 143.6' U m t 9,971.0( U 2 1,046.9( U 11,017.9E o R 0 a 22.6E Q 2.3E N 25.0E c14 0 E 32.3E 'M z 3.3E r 35.65 E t U m r 234.2( Q 5,159.5, Page: 18 Packet Pg. 151 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252421 5/12/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 252422 5/12/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 0001520 0001530 0002930 7.9.b Page: 19 PO # Description/Account Amoun c 001.000.237.150 294.0( State Patrol Death Investigation E E 001.000.237.330 24.9- a Judicial Information Systems Account L 001.000.237.180 1,185.7( .3 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 86.0E Washington Auto Theft Prevention Y 001.000.237.250 469.2( (D Traumatic Brain Injury U 001.000.237.260 209.9E E Accessible Communities Acct 6 001.000.237.290 11.1- ,- Multi -Model Transportation O 001.000.237.300 11.1- > Hwy Safety Acct o 001.000.237.320 118.7z a WSP Hwy Acct Q 001.000.237.340 141.4E N DNA Database Acct N 001.000.237.400 46.6 , 7 Total : 7,992.6E c PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S1 E PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S\ U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 22.8E +% CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW (D CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW E t 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 54.3z m CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ; Q CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ; 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 25.2z SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 25.21 Page: 19 Packet Pg. 152 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252422 5/12/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (Continued) 0021400 FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 0026390 PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total 252423 5/12/2022 072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3685-200899 UNIT 74 - PARTS/ LIGHT UNIT 74 - PARTS/ LIGHT 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-201821 UNIT 891 PARTS/ BOLT UNIT 891 PARTS/ BOLT 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-201970 UNIT 65 - PARTS/ LED LIGHT UNIT 65 - PARTS/ LED LIGHT 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 252424 5/12/2022 068451 OSW EQUIPMENT & REPAIR LLC 519535 UNIT 121 - CAMERA UNIT 121 - CAMERA 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 252425 5/12/2022 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT HPC041422 PLANNING - PROF SVCS 7.9.b Page: 20 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 153 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252425 5/12/2022 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT (Continued) Historical Preservation Committee 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 PB042722 PLANNING - PROF SVCS Planning Board Mtg Minutes- 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Tota I : 252426 5/12/2022 064167 POLLARD WATER WP027392 WATER - SUPPLIES/ 3X4FT DCHLR WATER - SUPPLIES/ 3X4FT DCHLR 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Tota I : 252427 5/12/2022 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 Total 252428 5/12/2022 075769 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC N9387172 UB FOLDING MACHINE LEASE 3/1/, UB Folding Machine Lease 3/1/22 - 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 UB Folding Machine Lease 3/1/22 - 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 UB Folding Machine Lease 3/1/22 - 422.000.72.531.90.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.48.00 Total 252429 5/12/2022 078921 QUALITY PLUMBING BLD2022-0556 PERMIT FEE REFUND 7.9.b Page: 21 Amoun c 84.0( E, �a a 124.0( .3 208.0( c �a U m 134.9E E 149.1, 0 R 0 4,392.3E a 4,392.3E Q N N N 229.9E 0 229.9E E M 236.9z U 24.1E E t U 24.1E Q 24.8E 770.OF Page: 21 Packet Pg. 154 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 22 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252429 5/12/2022 078921 QUALITY PLUMBING (Continued) Permit BLD2022-0556- E, 001.000.257.620 208.0( Total: 208.0( a (D 252430 5/12/2022 073885 RANDOLPH, PAMELA PR-5-4-22 WWTP: PRANDOLPH EXP CLAIM R 3 PRANDOLPH EXP CLAIM FOR AME 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 80.8� Total : 80.W Y U 252431 5/12/2022 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000055722 STORM - STREET SWEEPINGS a) STORM - STREET SWEEPINGS U 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 1,110.4E •9 Total: 1,110.41 Z 252432 5/12/2022 078283 REINTEGRATED MEDIA 436 AV TECH SUPPORT O 5 hours of AV Tech support for Coun( R o 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 875.0( a Total: 875.0( Q 252433 5/12/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE c%4 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 276.4z 3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; o PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 42.4E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 161.3, PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; m 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 161.31 t PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; r 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 161.3z Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 161.3z PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 161.3, Page: 22 Packet Pg. 155 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252433 5/12/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 252434 5/12/2022 068657 ROBERT HALF 252435 5/12/2022 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 252436 5/12/2022 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 23 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; c FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST : E 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 267.4E a 3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL (D CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL 3 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 71.6E Total: 1,464.61 M 59853851 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING U) U Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 2,440.9, E 59923175 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING ii Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee U 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 2,440.0( o Total : 4,880.9: 0 5-036163 UNIT 891 - BATTERY a UNIT 891 - BATTERY Q- Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax N 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.1 , N Total: 127.5, �n 0 650970 ACCT 1733 - EDMONDS PD 9MM AMMUNITION 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 392.7E Freight o 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 24.0( E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 43.3z 651786 ACCT 1733 - EDMONDS PD - SWAT Q 223 55GR AMMUNITION - SWAT 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 3,290.4( Freight 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 50.0( Page: 23 Packet Pg. 156 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252436 5/12/2022 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax E, 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 350.7,' Total: 4,151.2, a m 252437 5/12/2022 076328 SCJ ALLIANCE 67382 E20CE.SERVICES THRU 4.2.22 3 E20CE.SERVICES THRU 4.2.22 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 37,499.5' E20CE.SERVICES THRU 4.2.22 Y 112.000.68.595.20.61.00 3,604.7' u Total: 41,104.2' 252438 5/12/2022 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC S3-7235026 UNIT 282 - PARTS/ STEERING TIE F E UNIT 282 - PARTS/ STEERING TIE F U 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 40.2; p 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.2' p Total: L 44.5( a a Q 252439 5/12/2022 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 59201 REMOTE COMPUTER SUPPORT Remote computer support - 4/20/22, N 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 828.7E N Total : 828.7E 0 252440 5/12/2022 078920 SHOEMAKE, TABATHA DEC 21 SHOEMAKE - FOODBANK REIMBUF E FOOD BANK REIMBURSEMENT DE, 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 242.5, Total: 242.51 m 252441 5/12/2022 078782 SMITH FIRE SYSTEMS INC 58595 WWTP: CREDIT MEMO 58595 DATE E t CREDIT MEMO 58595 DATED 3/15/2 m 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 375.0( Q 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 39.3£ 60721 WWTP: LABOR, REPLACED 2 FIRE LABOR, REPLACED 2 FIRE EXTING Page: 24 Packet Pg. 157 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 25 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252441 5/12/2022 078782 SMITH FIRE SYSTEMS INC (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 345.0( 10.5% Sales Tax E 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 36.2; a CM58595 WWTP: CREDIT AGAINST INV 5859 L CREDIT AGAINST INV 58595 DATES 3 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 -375.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 -39.3E Y Total : 381 Z u t 252442 5/12/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200124873 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W E TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 40.2( 200202919 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV o LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 69.5E o L 200422418 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( a FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( Q 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 782.4' N 200493153 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W N TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W N 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 39.1 E c 200663953 ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M N ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 52.6; 2 201054327 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 48.4, E 201103561 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI U TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI f° 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 39.8E Q 201501277 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 27.2, 201532926 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- Page: 25 Packet Pg. 158 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252442 5/12/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 26 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- c 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 165.0 >, 201557303 CEMETERY BUILDING f° a CEMETERY BUILDING L 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 138.7E '3 201563434 TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA sa 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 34.6, Y 201703758 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( U PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 34.4E E 201711785 STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15( M STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 8.6 � 201762101 415 5TH AVE S _0 > 415 5TH AVE S o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 26.6, a 202139655 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 Q BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 28.6E N 202161535 CEMETERY WELL PUMP CEMETERY WELL PUMP 0 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 83.5" N 202356739 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W E TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W 2 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 31.1 +: 202499539 LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST (D LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST E 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 530.7( m 202529186 STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ Q STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 4,045.3E 202529202 STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40( STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 113.1( Page: 26 Packet Pg. 159 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252442 5/12/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 27 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C c STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 13,788.7< a 202579488 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 L STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 3 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 387.9< 202579520 WWTP: 4/1-4/30/22 ENERGY MGMT 4/1-4/30/22 ENERGY MANAGEMEN Y 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 11.0E 204292213 CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 78.2' 'R 204714893 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' O 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 6.2, > 204714927 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 0 L STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 a 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 162.3' Q 204714935 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 N STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 N 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 88.5" 04 205307580 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 0 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 145.5< .E 221593742 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 81.5E (D 222398059 SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY r 22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet - m 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 77.5 � 222704272 WWTP: 4/6-5/4/22 FLOWMETER 10( Q 4/6-5/4/22 FLOW METER 2400 HIGI- 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 21.5, 222818874 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A) Decorative Lighting 115 2nd Ave S / Page: 27 Packet Pg. 160 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252442 5/12/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 252443 5/12/2022 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER April 2022 252444 5/12/2022 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 69380 69392 252445 5/12/2022 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 25080 252446 5/12/2022 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 127014/4 PO # Description/Account 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 Total : Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 Total EDMONDS PD -STAMPS ACOP SIGNATURE STAMPS - DAWI 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 CASE STAMP- DETECTIVES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 EDMONDSPD- NGUYEN LOCKER MAGNET - NGUYEN 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 MAILBOX TAG - NGUYEN 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Total WWTP: 4/2022 JANITORIAL SERVI� 4/2022 JANITORIAL SERVICES 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total WATER - WORK WEAR K. KUHNHA WATER - WORK WEAR K. KUHNHA 7.9.b Page: 28 Amoun c 23.7( m 21,213.21 E �a a aD L �3 118.8E 118.8E U m t 42.3< U .ii 63.9E U 0 8.0( 0 11.8E a 0_ Q 4.5( N N 7.0( �n 0 4.2E E .R U 1.6z 143.51 E t U m 1,165.6, Q 1,165.E Page: 28 Packet Pg. 161 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 29 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252446 5/12/2022 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 249.7, 10.5% Sales Tax E 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 26.2, a 127705/4 FAC MAINT - WORK WEAR J. NOR[ L FAC MAINT - WORK WEAR J. NOR[ 3 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 388.2( 10.5% Sales Tax sa 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 40.71 Y 128298/4 WWTP: DLAWRENCE RAINGEAR C U DLAWRENCE RAINGEAR/RAINBO( 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 161.2( E 10.5% Sales Tax R 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 16.9, ,u Total: 883Z O 252447 5/12/2022 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 100101895-00 WATER/ SEWER - GREEN & BLUE ( �a o L WATER/ SEWER - GREEN & BLUE l a 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 297.7' Q WATER/ SEWER - GREEN & BLUE l N 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 297.7' N Freight N 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 23.8, c Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 23.8, . 10.5% Sales Tax fd U 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 33.7, 10.5% Sales Tax (D 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 33.7E E Total : 710.6: m r 252448 5/12/2022 078914 TEAMVIEWER GMBH R01423505 WATER/ SEWER - LICENSE SUBSC Q WATER/ SEWER - LICENSE SUBSC 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 1,291.0( WATER/ SEWER - LICENSE SUBSC 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 1,291.0( Page: 29 Packet Pg. 162 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252448 5/12/2022 078914 TEAMVIEWER GMBH (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 135.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 135.5E Total: 2,853.1- 252449 5/12/2022 078863 THE LANGUAGE EXCHANGE INC P2616 EDMONDS PD - TRYKAR TRANSLATION FEES - CHINESE 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 200.0( Total : 200.0( 252450 5/12/2022 027269 THE PART WORKS INC INV79895 F.A.C. - DRINKING FOUNTAIN F.A.C. - DRINKING FOUNTAIN 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 203.0, Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.7( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.5E Total : 237.2, 252451 5/12/2022 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 18811 TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 2,000.0( Total : 2,000.0( 252452 5/12/2022 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392 0033 WWTP: 4/12/22 SHIP CHG 4/12/22 SHIP CHG 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 42.3E Total: 42.3E 252453 5/12/2022 038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION US53294 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-ISI ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-ISI 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,639.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 172.1 E Page: 30 Packet Pg. 163 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 31 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252453 5/12/2022 038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION (Continued) US53301 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE F. ANDE ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE FRANC[ E 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,491.0< a 10.5% Sales Tax L .3 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 156.5( US53869 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC C ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC C ca 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,396.2.E Y 10.5% Sales Tax U 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 146.6E r Total: 5,002.4; E .ii 252454 5/12/2022 076927 TRI-TECH FORENSICS INC 649902 CUST 203641 - EDMONDS PD U NIK KITS - U o 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 151.2( Freight o 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 9.5( a Total : 160.7( Q 252455 5/12/2022 070902 ULVESTAD, KAREN 4/1-5/2 PHOTOS 4/1-5/2/22 PHOTOS OF RECREATIO C14 4/1-5/2/22 PHOTOS OF RECREATIO N 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 400.0( �n Total: 400.0( N E 252456 5/12/2022 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 270653 STORM & PARKS DUMP FEES M PARKS - DUMP FEES U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 424.3< STORM - DUMP FEES/ CLEAN ASP[ W E 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 197.2E Total: 621.61 Q 252457 5/12/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 924827 WWTP: PO 791 TOTAL CHLORINE F PO 791 TOTAL CHLORINE REAGEN 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 976.4, Freight Page: 31 Packet Pg. 164 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252457 5/12/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 0. .e• 252458 5/12/2022 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 2040146 252459 5/12/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS PO # Description/Account 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 WWTP: PO 834 SENSOR, PETRI DI; PO 834 SENSOR, PETRI DISH, PH 4 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 Total 9905415877 C/A 442201730-00001 iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 Dayton St Stormwater Pump Station 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 Total 252460 5/12/2022 072312 VERSATILE MOBILE SYSTEMS INC INVO138188 ACCT 20995 - EDMONDS PD ZEBRA 4000T LABELS 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 Total : 7.9.b Page: 32 Amoun c 68.0E E 108.6: a 3 3,244.7; c �a 34.5E Y U m 344.3, 4,776.71 E .ii U 4- 0 105.1E > 0 L 105.1.E a Q 108.3E N 318.6: N N 0 35.1 , E 2 U 26.5, 61.6E E t U m 640.0( Q 67.2( 707.2( Page: 32 Packet Pg. 165 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252461 5/12/2022 075155 WALKER MACY LLC 252462 252463 252464 5/12/2022 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice P3282.04-48 227566 227932 5/12/2022 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 0059150-2588-5 5/12/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 8173 PO # Description/Account EOMA/SERVICES THRU 4.25.22 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 4.25.22 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 4.25.22 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 Total CS 22-6085 - EDMONDS PD TOW BLUE SUBARU - CS 22-6085 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 CS 22-8076 - EDMONDS PD TOW SILVER HONDA 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total WWTP: 4/2022 WASTE PICKUPS 4/2022 WASTE PICKUPS 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 Total WWTP: RHAHN & RBAGAN BUSINE RHAHN & RBAGAN BUSINESS CAF 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 COUNCILMEMBER BUSINESS CAR New Business Cards, 250 each for Vi 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 One time set up fee, printing 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 7.9.b Page: 33 Amoun c m 4,212.6( �% M a 1,258.3" L 5,470.91 3 c 208.0( U t U 21.8z E v 208.0( O 145,199.3, 145,199.3: c E M 96.0( U 65.5E Q 15.0( 8.4( Page: 33 Packet Pg. 166 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 34 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252464 5/12/2022 073552 073552 WELCO SALES LLC (Continued) Total : 195.1( m 252465 5/12/2022 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000051365 E22AA-1070 - OVD & PUGET PATCH E E22AA-1070 - OVD & PUGET PATCH sa 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 a 25.4z m Freight 3 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 10.7z 10.5% Sales Tax 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 3.8( Y 0000051539 E22AA-I070 - CAT 5 CABLE FOR OV U E22AA-1070 - CAT 5 CABLE FOR OV t 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 U 326.5E E 10.5% Sales Tax M 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 34.2� Z Total: 400.8: o 252466 5/12/2022 077728 WILSON, LYNDA 2006756.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION R > 0 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION a 001.000.239.200 105.0( Q Total: 105.0E N N 252467 5/12/2022 063008 WSDOT RE 41 JZ1441 L001 EODC/ MARCH 2O22 PROJECT COS 04 EODC/ MARCH 2O22 PROJECT COS 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 199.9- EODC/ MARCH 2O22 PROJECT COS E 125.000.68.595.33.41.00 36.01 .m Total: 235.95 252468 5/12/2022 063008 WSDOT RE-313-ATB20418126 EBCC/PM THRU 3/31/22 E EBCC/PM THRU 3/31/22 t 112.000.68.542.33.41.67 42.3( EBCC/PM THRU 3/31/22 r Q 126.000.68.542.30.41.67 9.4 Total : 51.71 252469 5/12/2022 051280 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 9007335068 WATER - CLEANER Page: 34 Packet Pg. 167 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 35 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252469 5/12/2022 051280 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued) WATER - CLEANER 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 164.9, >, Freight a 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 24.9E L 10.5% Sales Tax 3 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 19.91 Total: 209.81 252470 5/12/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, U TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 272.2E E TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 272.2E 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI O LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 42.1 o 425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACC[ a LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRA[ Q 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 47.5E N 425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( N SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 58.2< c 425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIALACC E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.4E TU 425-776-5316 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 110.2E E Total : 829.11 u m r 252471 5/12/2022 073621 TANIMURA, NAOAKI 10039 10040 10041 10039 10040 10041 KENDO CLASS Q 10039 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTIO 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 420.7E 10040 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTIO 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 430.2 Page: 35 Packet Pg. 168 vchlist 05/12/2022 8:58:24AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252471 5/12/2022 073621 TANIMURA, NAOAKI 100 Vouchers for bank code: usbank 100 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.b Page: 36 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) r 10041 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTIO c E, 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 444.4( Total: 1,295.4, a m Bank total : 827,960.3: 3 Total vouchers : 827,960.3: U m t U E 2 U 4- 0 M 0 L Q El N N N Lf) O N E M V C d E t V f0 r Q Page: 36 Packet Pg. 169 7.9.c vchlist 05/12/2022 9:57:03AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 5122022 5/12/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 2892 HP 134X TONER CARTRIDGE a� Amazon - HP 134X toner cartridge E 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 88.2f ca 4210 BUSINESS MEETING m business lunch Nelson/Bennett 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 59.01 4697 FILE CABINET FOR NEIGHBORHOC file cabinet for neighborhood office N 001.000.60.557.20.49.00 202.0" ESCC booth at Summer Market 2 dat t 138.100.21.557.21.49.00 70.0( U Canva subscription 4/2022 E 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 12.9E Z May 2022 SCC meeting o 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 49.6E R keyboard cleaner o 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 16.5E L 0- 5593 SNO RECORDINGS, OFFICE SUPPI a a General Recording Fee - 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 737.5( N N N General Recording Fee - N T 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 737.5( c General Recording Fee 001.000.31.514.31.49.00 207.5( L 3 Snohomish Co Parking Garage - park 001.000.31.514.31.43.00 3.0( y Amazon - letter size minute book pap E 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 21.9, U Amazon - basics multipurpose copy `0 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 32.9� a Powered USB Hub 3.0, Atolla 7 Port l 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 29.9E Notary Renewal - Falk Nicholas 001.000.31.514.31.49.00 152.7. Page: 1 Packet Pg. 170 vchlist 05/12/2022 9:57:03AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 5122022 5/12/2022 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.9.c Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) -� Snohomish Co Auditor - Lien & 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 40.0( E Snohomish Co Auditor - Lien & �a 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 40.0( SanDisk 2 TB - File storage - City Cle 3 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 219.9� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.31.31.00 32.0, �a N 8842 GFOA MEMBERSHIP DUES GFOA - Membership dues for D Turle t 001.000.31.514.20.49.00 152.5( U GFOA - Membership dues for D Turle E 001.000.31.514.23.49.00 152.5( U Total: 3,058.7E o Bank total : 3,058.7E R o L Total vouchers : 3,058.7E Q N N N L6 O d L 3 c a� E U a Page: 2 Packet Pg. 171 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) 7.9.d Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number Moor174th St. & 71st Ave Stolllmprovements STM 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization c560 E21 FB 2018 Lorian Woods Stu s018 SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA 2019 Storm Maintenance Projec WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA IF STR 2019 Traffic Calming STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD TILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB Er WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement STR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA 2020 Overlay Program STR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB NEEP-2020 Pedestrian Task Force STR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC Er STR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR 2020 Waterline Overlay i053 EOCC irSTR 2021 Guardrail Installations STR 2021 Overlay Program i051 E21 CA STR 2021 Pedestrian Task Force i06 SWR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program i060 E21 CC STM 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program i061 E21 CD STR 2021 Traffic Calming i056 E21 AA 021 Waterline Overlay Program STR 2022 Guardrail Program i073 E22AC STR 2022 Overlay Program STR 2022 Pedestrian Safety program i072 E22DA 022 Sewerline Overlay Program = E22CC STR 2022 Signal Upgrades i070 E22AA 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program STR 2022 Traffic Calming Program i071 E22AB 11LITILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study STR 2022 Waterline Overlay Program i064 E22CB STR 220th Adaptive STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ram EBDC STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to H c485 E61DA STR 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) lb&R 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i052 E20CB i029 EBCA Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 172 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) 7.9.d Project Engineering Accounting Proiect Funding Project Title Number Number STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th ML STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD ADA Curb Ramps STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA Audible Pedestrian Signals STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA m E STIR Bikelink Project Q STIR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC L SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I 3 STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC M STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA t v Civic Center Playfield (Design) E WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB 2 STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 v o FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB > STM Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project c564 E21 FE O Q. O. STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB Q Elm St. Waterline Replacement N N STIR Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave i058 E21 DA Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA 0 O Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E O STIR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) i067 E22CE Z o VW Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) a STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD w SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i E6DD s as STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG Li GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA = d STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA E STM Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements c552 E20FC STM Perrinville Creek Recovery Study s028 E21FC .r Q SWR Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project c566 E22GA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c558 E21JA WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project c565 E22JA ■ STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project c563 E21 FD Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 173 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) 7.9.d Fundinq Project Title Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Projem SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Seaview rk InfiltrationliWility Phase 2 WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring W SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-2 STIR SR Revitalization Staqe 2 (Medians, Gatewav Siqnaqe & Hawk �S StandardWtails Update Project Engineering Accounting Project Number Number c548 EOGA E21 GA c502 E9MA E21 GB c479 ESFD c446 E4HA Moor E22CG i055 E20CE STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7F6 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA kside Warning Syst UTILITIES Utility Funds reserve Policies Study s029 E22NA alnut St. Walkway (3rd-4tW E913C PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration PRK STM WWTP WTR WTR PRK c544 E7MA estoration (Design) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration 7435 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 Yost & Seaview Reservoirsent s026 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades m160 Yost Park Infiltration Fac c556 E7MA E4FC ESHA EOJB E22JB E21 FA Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 174 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installation STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR qWOAM STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program _ 2020 Waterline Overlayl STR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force a EODB Y049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program L STR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project 13 In _ STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 N Y STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project d s SWR c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project co -Yost WT off & Seaview Reservoir Assessment c PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) > 0 Civic Center Playfield (Design) Q. GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update04 a Q tersection Improvements C N STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements 0 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) L STR E20CE i055 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20FC c552 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements 3 z STR E21 AA i056 2021 Traffic Calming a STR 2021 Guardrail Installations w STR E21 CA i051 2021 Overlay Program Waterlina`erlay Program d SWR E21 CC i060 2021 Sewer Overlay Program d E21 CD i061 ff'L 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program u: STR E21 DA i058 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E i062 2021 Pedestrian Task Forc PRK E21 FA c556 Yost Park Infiltration Facility Q STM 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization STM E21FC s028 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study hase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project STM E21 FE c564 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project hase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project SWR E21 GIB c562 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 175 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WTR _jL E21JA c558 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project WTR E21JB c561 Elm St. Waterline Replacement 070 STR E22AB i071 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AC F 2022 Guard STR E22CA i063 2022 Overlay Program E22CB ffi064 2022 Waterline Overlay Program STR E22CC i065 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CD __.ia66 2022 Stormwater Overlay Progra STR E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) rnnr r wy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) STR E22CG i069 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) 2022 Pedestrian Safety progra STM E22FA c567 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project c566 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E22JA c565 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JB & Seaview Resew airs and Upgrades UTILITIES E22NA s029 Utilitv Funds reserve Policies Study E22NB STR E3DB c423 E4FC 01WC435 STM E4FD c436 E4FE c455 SWR E4GC c461 WW FAC E4MB c443 STR E5DA c474 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Stu 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Lake Ballinger Associated Projects Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab MqVTrackside Warning System Bikelink Project nds Street Waterfront Connector STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility MENOW E5GB e a WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c482 yton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) WTR E51KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating Standard Details Updates STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 176 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) alk Pmnrqm STM E617D s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III , STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall MM IN L Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization ain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) c498 2019 Waterline Replacement 19 PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) IL"&. E8AB i028 -A20th Adaptive STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements E8CC AINLILPve W Overlay from to 212th STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps r 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Upda PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor IMSTR 91§MFPE9AA i038 W019 Traffic Calming STR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades WTR E9CB AL iO4,-J.,dAh.J019 Waterline Overlay STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR' E9DC STM E9FA s022 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) Ballinqer Reqional Facilitv Pre-Desiqn c502 VW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 177 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title PM EBMA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave); c STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects a FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station f° Y SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study U a� t STR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System U E WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating .2 STR ESDA c474 Bikelink Project _ STR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector > 0 STM ESFD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility a a WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications Q WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) N N STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) u� SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III N L STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) ° z_ WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement ° a FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South SWR EBGA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM EBFB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements y 3 WTR EBJA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement C L STM EBFC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project PRK EOMA c536 Civic Center Playfield (Design) r c ° E PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) �a STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 .r Q STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) STM E20FC c552 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements PRK E21 FA c556 Yost Park Infiltration Facility WTR E21JA c558 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 178 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title SWR E21 GA c559 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project STM E21 FB c560 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization WTR E21JB c561 Elm St. Waterline Replacement SWR E21 GB c562 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services STM E21 FD c563 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project STM E21 FE c564 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project WTR E22JA c565 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project SWR E22GA c566 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project STM E22FA c567 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive STR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) STR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAC i048 2020 Traffic Calming STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program STR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STR E21 CA i051 2021 Overlay Program STR E20CB i052 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) STR EOCC i053 2020 Waterline Overlay STR E20CE i055 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) STR E21 AA i056 2021 Traffic Calming Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 179 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title STR E21 AB i057 2021 Guardrail Installations STR E21 DA i058 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave WTR E21 CB i059 2021 Waterline Overlay Program SWR E21 CC i060 2021 Sewer Overlay Program ^ c STM E21 CD i061 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E STR E21 DB i062 2021 Pedestrian Task Force ca a STR E22CA i063 2022 Overlay Program STR E22CB i064 2022 Waterline Overlay Program STR E22CC i065 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program c STR E22CD i066 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program lie U STR E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) E STR E22CF i068 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) STR E22CG i069 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) _ STR E22AA i070 2022 Signal Upgrades STR E22AB i071 2022 Traffic Calming Program a STR E22DA i072 2022 Pedestrian Safety program Q STR E22AC i073 2022 Guardrail Program N STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) N PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) c STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization WTR E22JB m160 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E 3 UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates ? 0 SWR ESGB sol l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study a STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization N STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update T STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study c UTILITIES EBJB s02O 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design u_ c STR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force E GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update �a WTR EOJB s026 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Q STM E21 FC s028 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study UTILITIES E22NA s029 Utility Funds reserve Policies Study UTILITIES E22NB s03O 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 180 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA PRK Yost Park Infiltration Facility c556 E21 FA STM 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization c560 E21 FB STM Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project c567 E22FA STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program i061 E21 CD STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA STM Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project c563 E21 FD STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements c552 E20FC STM Perrinville Creek Recovery Study s028 E21 FC STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project c564 E21 FE STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 HAD STIR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 181 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA STR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB STR 2021 Guardrail Installations i057 E21AB STR 2021 Overlay Program i051 E21 CA STR 2021 Traffic Calming i056 E21AA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STR 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) i052 E20CB STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) i067 E22CE STR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) i068 E22CF STR SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) i069 E22CG STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB STR Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave i058 E21 DA STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STR SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) i055 E20CE STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC STR 2021 Pedestrian Task Force i061 E21 DB STR 2022 Overlay Program i063 E22CA STR 2022 Waterline Overlay Program i064 E22CB Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 182 7.9.d PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STIR 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program i065 E22CC STIR 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program i066 E22CD STIR 2022 Signal Upgrades i070 E22AA STIR 2022 Traffic Calming Program i071 E22AB STIR 2022 Pedestrian Safety program i072 E22DA STIR 2022 Guardrail Program i073 E22AC STIR 2020 Waterline Overlay i053 EOCC STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA SWR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program i060 E21CC SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA SWR Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c559 E21GA SWR Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services c562 E21GB SWR Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project c566 E22GA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA UTILITIES Utility Funds reserve Policies Study s029 E22NA UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study s030 E22NB WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program i059 E21CB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement c561 E21JB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c558 E21JA WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment s026 EOJB WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project c565 E22JA WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades m160 E22JB WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA Revised 5/12/2022 Packet Pg. 183 7.10 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Slate Salon & Spa Staff Lead: NA Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Slate Salon & Spa Narrative Slate Salon & Spa 601 Dayton ($10,549.20) Attachments: Claim for Damages - Slate Salon - for council Packet Pg. 184 7.10.a CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City Please take notp that r {x- (� Q� . who currently resides at E?I la fL t� T vas mailing address home phone # work phone # and who resided at rvs.." at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is is claiming damages against f� f elfinn . :6 the sum of $ /t7 �I�y �rJ arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: TIME: LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: Pa / f" DESCRIPTION: Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought A — ono I (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. - l 12 kjt c /c � _ �' � G i I � C �i S /v � �! 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2 E U Packet Pg. 185 7.10.a This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. i declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Claimant Date and place (residential address, city and county) Or_ /, ,,, AJ a4 Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 186 7.11 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 March 2022 Quarterly Financial Report Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Sarah Mager Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation No action needed; informational only. Narrative March 2022 Quarterly Financial Report Attachments: March 2022 Quarterly Financial Report Jan -March 2022 P&L Packet Pg. 187 1 7.11.a I OF EDP � d lac. 1SOV CITY OF EDMONDS QUARTERLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT MARCH 2O22 Packet Pg. 188 1 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY 1 7.11.a I Agency/ Investment Issuer Type FFCB Bonds Energy Northwest Bonds Energy Northwest Bonds Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA Bonds Grant Cnty WA Bonds Grant Cnty WA Bonds Seattle WA Muni Bonds FHLMC Bonds FHLB Bonds First Financial - ECA CD Kent WA Bonds FNMA Bonds Spokane County WA Bonds First Financial - Waterfront Center CD TOTAL SECURITIES Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool TOTAL PORTFOLIO City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail As of March 31, 2022 Years Purchase to Par Price 1,998,548 1,466,077 260,748 948,084 1,517,955 576,332 2,224,500 988,678 1,996,590 2,803,516 286,648 992,693 207,260 1,575,000 0.21 0.25 0.25 0.67 0.76 0.76 0.84 1.05 1.52 1.63 1.67 2.26 2.67 5.59 Value 2,000,000 1,345,000 250,000 855,000 1,500,000 520,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,803,516 250,000 1,000,000 200,000 1,575,000 Market Value 2,004,054 1,358,531 251,425 875,443 1,499,625 533,785 2,058,600 985,185 1,952,512 2,803,516 263,083 986,044 197,380 1,575,000 Maturity Date 06/14/22 07/01 /22 07/01 /22 12/01 /22 01 /01 /23 01 /01 /23 02/01 /23 04/20/23 10/05/23 11 /15/23 12/01 /23 07/02/24 12/01 /24 11 /01 /27 Coupon Rate 1.88% 5.00% 2.95% 5.00% 1.54% 5.00% 5.00% 0.38% 0.22% 2.08% 5.00% 1.75% 2.10% 0.25% 17,842,627 1.44 17,298,516 17,344,183 13,362,530 13,362,530 Demand 0.22% 42,585,060 42,585,060 Demand 0.99% $ 73,246,106 $ 73,291,773 Kent WA, Issuer Diversification Seattle WA 1% N Muni, 12% Mason & Kitsap Cnty— Fi rst WA 5% Financial - Grant Cnty CD, 25% Spokane WA, 12% I County FHLB, 12% WA, 1% FFCB, Energy 112% Northwest, FHLMC, 6% 9% FNMA, 6 . Cash and Investment Balances Checki ng, (in $ Millions) _$2.3 , 3% Bonds, State LGIP, CD's, $4.4, $12.9, 17% $13.4, 18% 6% County LGIP, 1` M Packet Pg. 189 1 1 7.11.a I INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Annual Interest Income $1,400, 000 $1,236,875 $1,200, 000 $1,000,000 $882556 947 931 $950,684 $800,000 $635,781 $600,000 $400,000 $258,837 $200,000 $- 2017 2018 201 2020 2021 YTD 2022 2 Packet Pg. 190 711a GENERAL FUND SUMMARY 10,000, 000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000, 000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000, 000 2,000, 000 1,000, 000 April General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months) General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenses IF July October January April July October January General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 through 2021) Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 12,000, 000 10,000, 000 8,000, 000 6,000,000 4,000, 000 2,000,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 General Fund Tax Revenue (2022 YTD) 3,000, 000 2 666 259 2,500,000 2 164 800 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 $144,014 Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 2 3 I Packet Pg. 191 July October January April July October January General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 through 2021) Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 12,000, 000 10,000, 000 8,000, 000 6,000,000 4,000, 000 2,000,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 General Fund Tax Revenue (2022 YTD) 3,000, 000 2 666 259 2,500,000 2 164 800 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 $144,014 Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 2 3 I Packet Pg. 191 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2022 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 2,486,429 $ 2,486,429 $ 2,291,020 -7.86% February 4,917,170 2,430,740 4,711,093 -4.19% March 7,380,020 2,462,851 7,394,990 0.20% April 10,516,012 3,135,992 May 19,357,334 8,841,322 June 21,935,611 2,578,276 July 24,465,539 2,529,929 August 27,084,819 2,619,280 September 29,465,113 2,380,294 October 33,512,944 4,047,830 November 42,090,496 8,577,552 December 44,640,708 2,550,212 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2022 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 381,097 $ 381,097 $ 377,895 -0.84% February 611,562 230,465 620,392 1.44% March 952,142 340,580 793,926 -16.62% April 1,227,434 275,291 May 1,586,772 359,339 June 1,961,879 375,106 July 2,368,248 406,370 August 2,810,074 441,826 September 3,256,638 446,564 October 3,660,486 403,848 November 4,056,561 396,075 December 4,400,000 343,439 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O Q N la U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t C) L M 2 4 Packet Pg. 192 SALES TAX SUMMARY 1 7.11.a I Health & Personal Care, $74,403 Construction Trade, $381,496 Accormnodation, $9,163 Clothing and Accessories,$93,384 Conmmnications, $64,476 Wholesale Trade, $93,277 12,000,000 10,000, 000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: March 2022 Year -to -Date Total $2,666,259 Automotive R air ep , Amusement & $55,691 Recreation, $17,716 Business Services, $311,926 Gasoline, $8,034 Retail Food Stores, $86,832 Misc Retail, $507,843 Others, $41,564 Manufacturing, $31,531 Eating & Drinlang, $271,236 Annual Sales Tax Revenue Lm-- — — 7.395.114 $8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046 $10,302,518 $2,666,259 2016 2017 2018 2019% 2020 2021 YTD 2022 0 a a� 76 U c c� c ii 21 a� 0 0 C� N N O N M 2 5 Packet Pg. 193 1 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2022 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 763,651 $ 763,651 $ 857,872 12.34% February 1,704,609 940,958 1,853,000 8.71% March 2,420,254 715,646 2,666,259 10.16% April 3,074,639 654,384 May 3,893,081 818,442 June 4,672,507 779,426 July 5,523,403 850,896 August 6,439,084 915,680 September 7,293,649 854,565 October 8,203,996 910,347 November 9,139,425 935,429 December 10,000,000 860,575 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2022 Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 79,399 $ 79,399 $ 96,596 21.66% February 164,205 84,806 96,596 -41.17% March 246,125 81,920 305,138 23.98% April 313,860 67,734 May 367,416 53,556 June 402,173 34,757 July 429,975 27,802 August 452,332 22,357 September 472,668 20,335 October 496,035 23,367 November 534,998 38,963 December 595,000 60,002 Gas Utility Tax 700,000 600,000 500,000 - 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O sZ N la U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t C) L M 2 6 Packet Pg. 194 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2022 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 53,352 $ 53,352 $ 43,844-17.82% February 96,981 43,629 66,255-31.68% March 143,255 46,275 130,244 -9.08% April 192,397 49,142 May 232,481 40,084 June 277,770 45,288 July 321,046 43,277 August 362,710 41,663 September 400,099 37,389 October 445,363 45,264 November 482,039 36,676 December 523,000 40,961 Electric Utility Tax Telephone Utility Tax 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 148,905 $ 148,905 $ 183,023 22.91% February 312,488 163,583 377,116 20.68% March 449,608 137,121 534,798 18.95% April 602,286 152,678 May 723,393 121,107 June 824,492 101,099 July 920,639 96,147 August 1,015,921 95,282 September 1,108,535 92,614 October 1,199,070 90,535 November 1,299,972 100,902 December 1,410,000 110,028 Electric Utility Tax 1,zsuu,uuu 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. :' O Q N la U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t U L M 2 Packet Pg. 195 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2022 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 809,979 $ 809,979 $ 827,704 2.19% February 1,383,405 573,426 1,383,308 -0.01% March 2,213,219 829,814 2,127,271 -3.88% April 2,744,029 530,810 May 3,542,697 798,668 June 4,167,857 625,160 July 5,138,308 970,451 August 5,986,736 848,427 September 7,133,311 1,146,575 October 7,954,825 821,514 November 8,891,706 936,881 December 9,464,783 573,077 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2022 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 426,464 $ 426,464 $ 417,730 -2.05% February 1,352,938 926,475 1,322,856 -2.22% March 1,779,789 426,851 1,740,623 18.95% April 2,159,443 379,654 May 2,586,880 427,437 June 2,966,444 379,564 July 3,385,868 419,425 August 4,311,526 925,657 September 4,738,766 427,240 October 5,118,192 379,426 November 5,545,860 427,668 December 5,911,497 365,637 Storm Water Sales 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget - Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O Q N Ia U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t U L M 2 Packet Pg. 196 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2022 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 863,521 $ 863,521 $ 877,046 1.57% February 1,571,494 707,973 1,604,010 2.07% March 2,435,565 864,071 2,451,231 0.64% April 3,143,499 707,934 May 4,009,811 866,312 June 4,719,932 710,121 July 5,593,564 873,631 August 6,307,925 714,362 September 7,215,145 907,220 October 7,936,868 721,723 November 8,819,637 882,769 December 9,528,089 708,452 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. W k'M 9 Packet Pg. 197 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2022 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 5,037,517 $ 5,037,517 $ 4,601,625 -8.65% February 8,698,448 3,660,931 8,134,057 -6.49% March 12,684,996 3,986,548 11,966,023 -5.67% April 16,175,500 3,490,504 May 19,877,618 3,702,118 June 24,471,701 4,594,083 July 28,365,788 3,894,088 August 32,050,601 3,684,813 September 35,945,309 3,894,708 October 40,212,016 4,266,707 November 44,691,350 4,479,334 December 49,371,535 4,680,185 Non -Departmental General Fund 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 5,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --*--Current Year Budget —Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 2,235,029 $ 2,235,029 $ 2,099,939 -6.04% February 3,157,194 922,165 2,938,380 -6.93% March 4,332,218 1,175,025 4,088,791 -5.62% April 5,048,922 716,703 May 5,936,975 888,054 June 7,580,854 1,643,878 July 8,529,581 948,727 August 9,310,253 780,673 September 10,214,848 904,595 October 11,354,650 1,139,802 November 12,623,189 1,268,539 December 13,877,484 1,254,295 Non -Departmental 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"— Current Year Budget 0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O sZ N la U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t U L M 2 10 Packet Pg. 198 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2022 City Council Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 33,985 $ 33,985 $ 23,687-30.30% February 71,308 37,323 43,670-38.76% March 112,128 40,821 71,408-36.32% April 150,174 38,046 May 199,408 49,234 June 253,207 53,799 July 291,886 38,679 August 345,215 53,328 September 382,380 37,165 October 414,981 32,601 November 455,321 40,340 December 497,900 42,579 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2022 Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 36,522 $ 36,522 $ 28,255 -22.63% February 74,639 38,117 59,226 -20.65% March 111,240 36,600 89,568 -19.48% April 148,486 37,247 May 185,158 36,671 June 221,111 35,953 July 257,901 36,789 August 295,030 37,129 September 331,738 36,709 October 367,805 36,067 November 405,747 37,941 December 443,913 38,166 Office of Mayor 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-CurrentYeaz Budget --*-PriorYeaz *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O Q N 76 U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t 0 L M 2 11 Packet Pg. 199 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2022 Human Resources Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 77,402 $ 77,402 $ 59,932 -22.57% February 141,639 64,236 135,524 -4.32% March 202,815 61,176 203,581 0.38% April 266,756 63,941 May 331,195 64,439 June 405,872 74,678 July 464,145 58,273 August 524,126 59,981 September 590,408 66,282 October 654,662 64,254 November 726,800 72,138 December 824,831 98,031 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2022 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 104,268 $ 104,268 $ 91,643 -12.11% February 213,906 109,638 187,919 -12.15% March 322,490 108,584 284,025 -11.93% April 431,592 109,102 May 548,505 116,913 June 654,584 106,079 July 763,667 109,084 August 884,110 120,443 September 995,910 111,800 October 1,110,987 115,077 November 1,227,059 116,072 December 1,368,755 141,696 Municipal Court 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-CurrentYeaz Budget -m-PriorYear *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O Q N R U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t 0 L M 2 12 Packet Pg. 200 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2022 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 49,857 $ 49,857 $ 33,127-33.56% February 103,113 53,256 72,230-29.95% March 155,568 52,455 122,479-21.27% April 205,451 49,882 May 260,752 55,301 June 315,986 55,234 July 373,132 57,147 August 434,777 61,645 September 492,000 57,223 October 552,240 60,239 November 622,590 70,351 December 719,388 96,798 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 13 Packet Pg. 201 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund 2022 Technology Rental Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 176,962 $ 176,962 $ 216,858 22.55% February 334,966 158,004 287,295-14.23% March 484,397 149,431 502,978 3.84% April 566,805 82,408 May 674,037 107,232 June 784,541 110,504 July 877,847 93,306 August 989,174 111,327 September 1,106,217 117,044 October 1,245,373 139,155 November 1,341,722 96,350 December 1,539,022 197,300 Administrative Services Technology Rental Fund 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget -d Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 225,174 $ 225,174 $ 217,022 -3.62% February 377,256 152,082 380,532 0.87% March 531,363 154,106 547,460 3.03% April 687,851 156,488 May 845,341 157,490 June 1,057,978 212,637 July 1,239,765 181,786 August 1,394,692 154,927 September 1,554,018 159,326 October 1,720,684 166,666 November 1,876,703 156,018 December 2,034,511 157,808 Administrative Services 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget - Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. :' O sZ N la U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t 0 L M 2 14 Packet Pg. 202 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2022 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 80,982 $ 80,982 $ 77,656 -4.11% February 161,963 80,982 155,234 -4.16% March 242,945 80,982 233,065 -4.07% April 323,927 80,982 May 404,908 80,982 June 485,890 80,982 July 566,871 80,982 August 647,853 80,982 September 728,835 80,982 October 809,816 80,982 November 890,798 80,982 December 971,780 80,982 Police City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 1,045,238 $ 1,045,238 $ 973,358 -6.88% February 2,105,968 1,060,730 1,945,020 -7.64% March 3,177,596 1,071,629 3,008,075 -5.33% April 4,236,492 1,058,896 May 5,296,298 1,059,805 June 6,428,932 1,132,634 July 7,551,012 1,122,080 August 8,579,704 1,028,692 September 9,657,485 1,077,782 October 10,845,669 1,188,184 November 12,168,634 1,322,964 December 13,375,470 1,206,836 Police 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"— Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O sZ N la U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t 0 L M 2 15 Packet Pg. 203 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services 2022 Development Services Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 272,173 $ 272,173 $ 309,139 13.58% February 567,186 295,012 661,303 16.59% March 860,247 293,062 909,669 5.75% April 1,174,618 314,370 May 1,488,050 313,432 June 1,792,716 304,666 July 2,114,310 321,593 August 2,423,605 309,295 September 2,733,462 309,857 October 3,039,102 305,640 November 3,402,002 362,901 December 3,791,859 389,857 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2022 Parks & Recreation Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 355,005 $ 355,005 $ 319,222-10.08% February 741,630 386,626 651,988-12.09% March 1,126,533 384,902 1,040,803 -7.61% April 1,522,026 395,493 May 1,924,429 402,403 June 2,349,557 425,128 July 2,810,826 461,269 August 3,318,701 507,875 September 3,838,405 519,704 October 4,255,109 416,704 November 4,650,272 395,163 December 5,081,735 431,463 Parks & Recreation 5,500,000 4,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget - Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O sZ N R U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t U L M 2 16 Packet Pg. 204 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration 2022 Public Works Administration Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 49,466 $ 49,466 $ 22,716-54.08% February 100,066 50,600 46,637-53.39% March 150,167 50,100 71,242-52.56% April 201,867 51,701 May 252,421 50,554 June 303,852 51,431 July 355,684 51,832 August 405,471 49,786 September 455,172 49,701 October 504,185 49,013 November 567,424 63,239 December 614,113 46,689 Facilities Maintenance Public Works Administration 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget � Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 147,178 $ 147,178 $ 109,202-25.80% February 306,257 159,079 369,398 20.62% March 485,440 179,182 562,089 15.79% April 646,968 161,528 May 809,892 162,925 June 942,838 132,946 July 1,105,857 163,019 August 1,298,546 192,690 September 1,524,621 226,074 October 1,782,450 257,829 November 1,988,047 205,597 December 2,298,775 310,728 Facilities Maintenance 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O sZ N la U C fC C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t 0 L M 2 17 Packet Pg. 205 1 7.11.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2022 Engineering Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 225,595 $ 225,595 $ 226,829 0.55% February 452,988 227,392 457,182 0.93% March 684,071 231,083 685,977 0.28% April 917,956 233,885 May 1,175,026 257,070 June 1,412,521 237,495 July 1,660,688 248,167 August 1,900,016 239,329 September 2,131,816 231,799 October 2,366,570 234,755 November 2,602,612 236,042 December 2,845,336 242,724 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 18 Packet Pg. 206 1 7.11.a I Page 1 of 1 C TTY O F IDMO NDS REVINUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 44,640,708 $ 7,050,949 $ 7,394,990 $ 37,245,718 170 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 225,000 - - 225,000 00 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND - - 15,259 (15,259) 04 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 200,000 - - 200,000 04 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 167,210 551 578 166,632 00 Ill STREET FUND 1,751,930 334,430 321,969 1,429,961 180 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 1 13,684,871 537,842 1,084,583 12,600,288 80 d 117 MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND 216,701 7,521 77,198 139,503 360 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - 150 - - 04 t� 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 84,410 10,579 19,965 64,445 240 C 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,540 8,137 8,246 18,294 310 li 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,550 102 110 1,440 74 i N 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 29,590 3,949 7,199 22,391 240 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2,271,020 630,895 428,334 1,842,686 190 CY 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2,261,030 628,639 423,383 1,837,647 190 N 127 GIFT S CAT ALOG FUND 82,750 35,216 65,930 16,820 800 N 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 182,430 45,191 51,737 130,693 280 V 136 PARKSTRUST FUND 4,330 1,235 1,294 3,036 L 300 M 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 43,520 12,939 14,031 29,489 320 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,290 77 119 10,171 10 O 0. 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 79,349 36,305 37,412 41,937 470 � 141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSINGFUND 65,000 20,307 23,034 41,966 350 .D 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 4,856,549 - - 4,856,549 04 C 143 TREE FUND 215,330 - 157 215,173 04 E 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 611,370 - - 611,370 00 >, 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 2 3,822,685 239,273 808,208 3,014,477 210 4) 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 250 46,790 (46,790) 04 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 11,018,136 2,508,558 2,553,715 8,464,421 230 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 3 7,877,897 2,272,486 1,984,530 5,893,367 250 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 4 24,820,083 5,539,148 5,144,772 19,675,311 210 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,700 3 3 1,988,697 04 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,925,920 355,678 463,683 1,462,237 240 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,153,570 305,397 291,812 861,758 250 $ 124,318,469 $ 20,585,807 $ 21,269,040 $103,049,429 170 Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Traffic Impact fee in March 2022. 2 Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Park Impact fee in March 2022. r 2022 Utility Rate Increases are 4.5%for Water, 5%for Sewer, and 9.5%for Storm Drain. 4 Difference is primarily due to WWTP partner billings in January 2021. 19 Packet Pg. 207 1 7.11.a I Page 1 of 1 C ITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining '%Spent 001 GENERAL FUND $ 49,371,535 $ 11,022,804 $ 11,966,023 $ 37,405,512 240 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 260,490 104,456 88,086 172,404 340 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,900 - 5,900 00, 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 980,000 16,522 963,478 20,, 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 200,000 - 200,000 00 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 45,800 - 45,800 0/ III STREET FUND 2,254,676 600,399 612,607 1,642,069 270, Q 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 12,868,796 65,351 412,691 12,456,105 d 30, 117 MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND 195,380 9,336 12,908 182,472 70, t� 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 100,900 10,144 8,555 92,345 80 _ R C 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 - - 26,880 00, jL 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 - 3,000 00, i 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 28,200 - - 28,200 a� 00 R 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 4,589,688 26,799 423,951 4,165,737 9° CY 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2,483,667 149,742 133,238 2,350,429 50, N 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 78,400 8,980 2,462 75,938 30, N 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 220,561 45,001 45,724 174,837 210 V L 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 50,000 - - 50,000 00 M 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 25,000 - 25,000 00, 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 11,900 - - 11,900 00, 0 0. 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 87,680 8,828 11,101 76,579 130 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 5,977,492 - 232,175 5,745,317 40/ !C 143 TREE FUND 214,800 - 214,800 00 r 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 611,370 - 611,370 00, LL 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 7,614,418 67,492 1,630,281 5,984,137 210 >% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 11,475,894 1,134,754 1,422,285 10,053,609 120 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 9,681,440 877,509 1,143,115 8,538,325 120 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,512,501 2,127,934 3,720,393 25,792,108 130, 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 - - 1,988,710 00, 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,942,460 279,099 346,163 1,596,297 180 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,539,022 350,229 502,978 1,036,044 330 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND - 25,838 - - 00, S 144,446,560 $ 16,914,695 $ 22,731,259 $121,715,301 160, 20 Packet Pg. 208 1 7.11.a I Page 1 of 3 Title TAXES: 1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 2 EMS PROPERTY TAX 3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX 4 LOCAL RETAIL SALESIUSE TAX 5 5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 8 GAS UTILITY TAX 9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 10 WATERUTILITY TAX 11 SEWER UTILITY TAX 12 ST ORMWAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX 13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 15 PULLTABSTAX 16 AMUSEMENT GAMES 17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LICENSES AND PERMITS: 18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE 19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST 22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT 23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER 24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 28 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 29 ANIMAL LICENSES 30 STREET AND CURB PERMIT 31 OT R NON -BUS LIC/PERMIT S INTERGOVERNMENTAL: 32 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 33 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 34 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2 35 DOC FAC ROOFING 36 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY 37 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 38 CJ - POPULATION 39 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT 40 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS 41 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION 42 DUI - CITIES 43 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 44 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 45 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND 46 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ. 47 VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 Budget Revenues 3/31/2022 Amount Revenues Remaining %Received $ 11,127,000 $ 156,809 $ 362,542 $ 10,764,458 30/ 4,278,000 61,297 144,014 4,133,986 30/ 500 1 27 473 501 10,000,000 2,350,659 2,666,259 7,333,741 270/ 7,600 1,803 4,804 2,796 630/ 870,000 223,665 249,575 620,425 290/ 1,410,000 537,433 534,798 875,202 380r 595,000 269,171 305,138 289,862 5101 284,000 90,594 94,158 189,842 330r 953,000 220,042 212,668 740,332 220i 894,600 229,266 160,357 734,244 180/ 471,900 158,676 174,064 297,836 370i 792,000 195,056 203,217 588,783 260/ 523,000 140,907 130,244 392,756 250r 55,200 23,251 18,591 36,609 340/ 350 143 - 350 00/ 306,000 75,813 77,158 228,842 250r 32,568,150 4,734,587 5,337,614 27,230,536 160, 250 300 50 200 200/ 700 - 20 680 30r 40,000 8,951 14,725 25,275 370/ 702,700 170,449 179,444 523,256 260/ 41,000 9,639 9,105 31,895 220i 100,600 15,635 12,550 88,050 120/ 384,000 82,609 84,298 299,702 220r 250,000 62,275 64,396 185,604 260/ 63,000 23,410 24,775 38,225 399 30,000 14,440 30,173 (173) 1010/ 650,600 140,920 222,875 427,725 340/ 24,000 5,114 7,135 16,865 300/ 55,000 17,915 12,958 42,042 240/ 20,000 3,497 3,754 16,246 190r 2,361,850 555,153 666,258 1,695,592 280, 9,000 2,671 5,237 3,763 580/ 11,100 908 718 10,382 60/ - 3,947 - - 00/ - 379,270 - - 00/ 273,000 - - 273,000 00/ 210,500 - - 210,500 00/ 13,070 3,379 3,571 9,499 270/ 16,740 4,035 5,388 11,352 320/ 45,600 12,061 12,693 32,907 280/ 60,000 17,895 24,665 35,335 410/ 4,500 1,667 1,793 2,707 400/ 261,500 68,016 72,230 189,270 280r 343,200 83,909 83,190 260,010 240/ 1,000 - - 1,000 00/ 550 - - 550 00/ - 30,000 - - 00/ 1,249,760 607,758 209,486 1,040,274 170/ O O. lY i0 C R C iL A L d R 3 CY N N O N t c� M 2 5 2022 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $315,600 higher than 2021 revenues. Please also see pagespages 5 & 6. 21 1 Packet Pg. 209 1 7.11.a Page 2 of 3 C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: 1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES 3 CREDIT CARD FEES 4 COURT RECORD SERVICES 5 D/M COURT REC SER 6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE 7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE 8 IT TIME PAY FEE 9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS 11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 13 PHOTOCOPIES 14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES 17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES (SNO-ISLE) 18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 24 LEGAL SERVICES 25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 26 BOOKING FEES 27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTSFROMSI'ATIONS 31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 33 PLAN CHECKING FEES 34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 35 PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW 37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY 38 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 39 PROGRAM FEES 40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 41 HOLIDAY MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 42 WINTERMARKET FEES 43 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 44 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS $ 3,000 $ 1,147 $ 1,897 $ 1,103 630r 600 24 44 557 70/ 11,000 1,521 441 10,559 40r 150 - 1 149 10/ 300 - - 300 00/ - 168 - - 00/ 4,000 - - 4,000 00/ 1,000 164 49 951 501 50 60 37 13 730r 100 - - 100 00/ 25,000 - - 25,000 00/ 600 - - 600 00/ 1,000 92 51 949 501 5,000 - - 5,000 00/ 180,000 66,687 82,228 97,772 460/ 1,400 - 2,885 (1,485) 2060/ 85,000 17,070 24,410 60,590 290/ 10,000 - 1,400 8,600 140/ 30,000 - - 30,000 00/ 14,000 - - 14,000 00/ 210,970 51,206 52,742 158,228 250/ - - 13 (13) 00/ 57,000 14,616 15,373 41,627 270/ 1,050 39 126 924 120/ 38,000 8,404 4,560 33,440 120/ 3,000 181 103 2,897 30/ 10,000 4,885 7,963 2,037 800r 3,500 932 177 3,323 501 1,007,500 201,222 238,403 769,097 240i 2,500 520 1,164 1,336 470/ 100 - - 100 00/ 65,600 19,323 24,928 40,673 380/ 425,000 174,718 57,962 367,038 140/ 4,000 2,606 4,234 (234) 1060/ 500 - 110 390 220/ 3,000 740 2,220 780 740/ 14,000 2,750 5,370 8,630 380/ 13,000 - 231 12,769 20r 1,011,580 57,824 174,034 837,546 170/ 1,300 - - 1,300 00/ 5,000 185 - 5,000 00/ - - 6,880 (6,880) 00/ 1,000 - - 1,000 00/ 4,011,558 303,576 294,624 3,716,934 70i 7,261,358 930,658 1,004,658 6,256,700 140, O O. d iC C O C LL a� R 3 CY N N O N t L 9 22 Packet Pg. 210 7.11.a Page 3 of 3 C ITY O F EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received FINES AND PENALTIES: 1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 6 OTHER INFRACTIONS'04 7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 8 PARK/INDDISZONE 9 DWI PENALTIES 10 DUI - DP ACCT 11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI 12 DUI - DP FEE 13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 15 CRIM CONV FEE CT 16 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 20 CRIM CONV FEE CN 21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT 24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES NIIS C ELLANEO US : 26 INVESTMENT INTEREST 27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 29 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS 30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 31 LEASES LONG TERM 32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION 33 PARKSDONATIONS 34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 39 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT 40 POLICE JUDGMENTS✓RESTITUTION 41 CASHIERS OVERAGES✓SHORTAGES 42 OTHER MISC REVENUES 43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT 44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 45 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 46 NSF FEES - POLICE 47 US BANK REBATE TRANSFERS -IN: 48 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 2,000 $ 907 $ 469 $ 1,531 230/ 230,000 53,193 15,805 214,195 70/ 18,000 2,184 1,180 16,820 70/ 10,000 4,287 963 9,037 100/ 1,000 203 - 1,000 00/ 1,500 688 218 1,282 150/ 100,000 15,262 4,135 95,865 40/ 2,000 250 72 1,928 40/ 7,000 2,027 990 6,010 140/ 300 16 26 274 90/ 100 38 9 91 90/ 1,500 563 505 995 340/ 25,000 3,355 2,971 22,029 120/ 2,000 398 475 1,525 240/ 700 16 34 666 50/ 100 12 - 100 00/ 10,000 307 636 9,364 60/ 800 15 12 788 20/ 1,000 9 81 919 80/ 200 7 - 200 00/ 8,000 649 933 7,067 120/ 14,000 2,535 790 13,210 60/ 3,000 620 49 2,951 20/ 10,100 - - 10,100 00/ 150 - - 150 00/ 448,450 87,542 30,353 418,097 70/ 270,390 69,052 74,203 196,187 270/ 13,340 2,191 1,132 12,208 80/ 10,180 1,971 1,875 8,305 180/ 153,000 1,987 11,244 141,756 70/ 2,100 - - 2,100 00/ 205,000 48,371 51,562 153,438 250/ 2,500 - 76 2,424 30/ 3,500 - 2,300 1,200 660/ 1,500 350 - 1,500 00/ 5,000 - 249 4,751 501 300 - - 300 00/ 3,800 2,392 996 2,804 260/ 2,000 - - 2,000 00/ 2,000 102 - 2,000 00/ 200 20 20 180 100/ - 2 14 (14) 00/ 41,180 3,767 773 40,407 20/ 100 21 20 80 200/ 100 30 - 100 00/ 150 - - 150 00/ - 30 - - 00/ 8,500 4,966 2,158 6,342 250/ 724,840 135,251 146,621 578,219 200, 26,300 - - 26,300 00/ 26,300 - - 265300 00/ $ 44,640,708 $ 7,050,949 $ 7,394,990 $ 37,245,718 170/ 23 Packet Pg. 211 1 7.11.a I Page 1 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 19,196,413 $ 4,228,263 $ 4,326,088 $ 14,870,325 230 2 OVERTIME 594,080 133,856 302,420 291,660 510 3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK 294,001 1,951 8,212 285,789 M 4 BENEFITS 6,820,049 1,594,208 1,616,010 5,204,039 24° 5 UNIFORMS 119,151 19,640 13,344 105,807 110 6 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 70,944 - 11,825 59,119 170 7 SUPPLIES 481,165 109,833 80,236 400,929 174 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 204,019 60,119 29,359 174,660 14° 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,274,828 3,529,801 3,958,794 11,316,034 260 10 COMMUNICATIONS 171,235 41,100 30,315 140,920 1M 11 TRAVEL 81,155 517 4,397 76,758 5° 12 EXCISE TAXES 16,500 5,627 7,774 8,726 470 13 RENTAL/LEASE 2,091,693 382,348 510,493 1,581,200 240 14INSURANCE 375,539 405,121 503,160 (127,621) 1344 15 UTILITIES 529,462 140,132 157,296 372,166 3M 16 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 364,850 168,969 179,938 184,912 490 17 MISCELLANEOUS 652,023 151,319 176,364 475,659 270 18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 10M 19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,385,000 - - 1,385,000 M 20 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - - 0° 21 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 270,180 - - 270,180 04 22 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 55,170 - - 55,170 04 23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 4,790 - - 4,790 M 24 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 268,788 - - 268,788 04 25 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 - - 500 04 49,371,535 11,022,804 11,966,023 37,405,512 27 LEO FF-MEDIC AL INS. RESERVE (009) 26 BENEFITS $ - $ 67,631 $ 59,723 $ (59,723) 00 27 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 252,990 36,825 21,363 231,627 84 28 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 - 7,000 - 100° 29 MISCELLANEOUS 500 - - 500 0° 260,490 S 104,456 88,086 172,404 344 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) 30 SUPPLIES $ 100 $ $ - $ 100 0° 31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 200 00 32 MISCELLANEOUS 5,600 5,600 0° 5,900 - 5,900 04 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016) 33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 115,000 $ $ 450 $ 114,550 09 34 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 665,000 - 16,072 648,928 2° 35 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 90,000 - - 90,000 0° 36 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 110,000 - - 110,000 00 980,000 - 16,522 963,478 24 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018) 37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 04 200,000 - - 200,000 00 DRUG ENFO RC EMENT FUND (104) 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 04 39 REPAIR/MAINT 800 - - 800 0° 45,800 - 45,800 04 2 24 Packet Pg. 212 1 7.11.a I Page 2 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent STREETFUND (111) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 749,110 $ 185,871 $ 175,741 $ 573,369 2M 2 OVERTIME 38,400 13,854 8,784 29,616 2M 3 BENEFITS 347,919 91,562 86,684 261,235 250 4 UNIFORMS 6,000 4,156 3,107 2,893 524 5 SUPPLIES 263,000 15,469 15,428 247,572 6° 6 SMALL EQUIPMENT 20,000 - 587 19,413 39 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,210 4,276 4,457 18,753 190 8 COMMUNICATIONS 4,500 1,725 1,284 3,216 294 9 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 W 10 RENTAL/LEASE 290,150 61,397 72,120 218,030 250 11 INSURANCE 123,007 148,533 184,111 (61,104) 15W 12 UTILITIES 273,730 57,041 45,731 227,999 170 13 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 72,000 9,065 4,212 67,788 64 14 MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 7,450 10,360 (2,360) 13W 15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 30,000 - - 30,000 W 16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 4,270 - - 4,270 09 17 INTEREST 380 - - 380 04 $ 2,254,676 $ 600,399 $ 612,607 $ 1,642,069 274 COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE(112) 18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 3,159,560 $ 65,351 $ 109,042 $ 3,050,518 M 19 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 1,508,270 - 122 1,508,148 04 20 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 108,975 - - 108,975 04 21 LAND - - 32,660 (32,660) 0° 22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 8,018,521 - 270,868 7,747,653 M 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,220 - - 72,220 04 24 INTEREST 1,250 - - 1,250 0° $ 12,868,796 $ 65,351 $ 412,691 $ 12,456,105 M MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) 25 SUPPLIES $ 4,700 $ 217 $ $ 4,700 0° 26 SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,700 - 1,700 0° 27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 180,000 8,507 11,883 168,117 74 28 TRAVEL 80 - - 80 04 29 RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 2,000 09 30 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 04 31 MISCELLANEOUS 6,600 612 1,025 5,575 164 $ 195,380 $ 9,336 $ 12,908 $ 182,472 79 HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) 32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,900 $ 10,144 $ 8,555 $ 87,345 94 33 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 - - 1,000 0° 34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 4,000 - - 4,000 09 $ 100,900 $ 10,144 $ 8,555 $ 92,345 M EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) 35 SUPPLIES $ 1,790 $ - $ - $ 1,790 0° 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,090 - - 25,090 0° $ 26,880 $ - $ - $ 26,880 0° YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) 37 MISCELLANEOUS $ 3,000 $ $ - $ 3,000 04 $ 3,000 $ $ $ 3,000 09 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123 ) 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 28,200 $ $ - $ 28,200 04 $ 28,200 $ - $ - $ 28,200 0° O O- iC C R C LL A L d R 7 CY N N O N t v tL0 2 25 Packet Pg. 213 1 7.11.a I Page 3 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL ESTATE EXC ISE TAX 2 (125) 1 SUPPLIES $ 21,000 $ 12,215 $ 7,222 $ 13,778 340 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 469,320 9,514 59,372 409,948 139 3 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 668,258 5,070 56,168 612,090 M 4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2,534 - - 2,534 09 5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,428,576 - 301,189 3,127,387 94 $ 4,589,688 $ 26,799 $ 423,951 $ 4,165,737 9° REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126) 6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 10 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 11 INTEREST GWIS CATALOG FUND (127) 12 SUPPLIES 13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14 MISCELLANEOUS 15 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES CEVIEIIItYMAINTENANCF/I PR0VEMENT(130) 16 SALARIES AND WAGES 17 OVERTIME 18 BENEFIT S 19 UNIFORMS 20 SUPPLIES 21 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 22 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23 COMMUNICATIONS 24 TRAVEL 25 RENTAL/LEASE 26 UTILITIES 27 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 28 MISCELLANEOUS PARKS TRUSTFUND (136) 29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137) 30 SMALL EQUIPMENT SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) 31 SUPPLIES 32 TRAVEL 33 MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140) 34 SUPPLIES 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36 MISCELLANEOUS EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142) 37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE FUND (143) 38 SUPPLIES 39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40 LAND 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) 41 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 42 INTEREST $ 673,827 $ 52,341 $ 22,499 $ 651,328 M 878,353 14,138 13,266 865,087 2° 144,970 - - 144,970 00 526,057 83,264 97,473 428,584 190 149,820 - - 149,820 0° 110,640 - - 110,640 09 $ 2,483,667 $ 149,742 $ 133,238 $ 2,350,429 54 $ 45,000 $ 8,980 $ 2,462 $ 42,538 59 6,500 - - 6,500 0° 600 - - 600 0° 26,300 - - 26,300 0° $ 78,400 $ 8,980 $ 2,462 $ 75,938 T $ 119,837 $ 20,978 $ 21,898 $ 97,939 180 3,500 120 210 3,290 64 41,069 9,434 9,412 31,658 2M 1,000 - - 1,000 00 7,000 - 45 6,955 1° 20,000 5,616 5,253 14,747 260 4,200 800 800 3,400 190 1,700 421 428 1,272 254 500 - - 500 0° 11,690 4,163 2,923 8,767 250 5,565 902 888 4,677 16° 500 - - 500 M 4,000 2,567 3,868 132 970 $ 220,561 $ 45,001 $ 45,724 $ 174,837 214 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 04 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 M $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0° $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0° $ 1,500 $ - $ - $ 1,500 M 4,500 - - 4,500 M 5,900 - - 5,900 04 $ 11,900 $ - $ - $ 11,900 09 $ 4,050 $ 273 $ 94 $ 3,956 2° 77,535 8,203 10,835 66,700 140 6,095 352 172 5,923 M 87,680 8,828 11,101 76,579 IM $ 5,977,492 $ - $ 232,175 $ 5,745,317 44 5,977,492 - 232,175 5,745,317 44 $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000 04 14,800 - - 14,800 04 199,000 - - 199,000 00 214,800 - - 214,800 04 $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ 550,000 00 61,370 - - 61,370 M $ 611,370 $ - $ - $ 611,370 0° O O. d is C O C LL A L d R 3 CY N N 0 N t v W 2 26 Packet Pg. 214 1 7.11.a I Page 4 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332) 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,832 $ 718 $ 91,809 $ 4,023 969 2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 63,000 - 62,656 344 999 3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 7,357,188 66,774 1,475,816 5,881,372 209 4 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 98,398 - - 98,398 09 $ 7,614,418 $ 67,492 $ 1,630,281 $ 5,984,137 210 WATER FUND (421) 5 SALARIES AND WAGES 6 OVERTIME 7 BENEFIT S 8 UNIFORMS 9 SUPPLIES 10 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 11 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 12 SMALL EQUIPMENT 13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14 COMMUNICATIONS 15 TRAVEL 16 EXCISE TAXES 17 RENTAL/LEASE 18 INSURANCE 19 UTILITIES 20 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 21 MISCELLANEOUS 22 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 23 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 24 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 25 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 26 REVENUE BONDS 27 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 28 INTEREST STORM FUND (422) 29 SALARIES AND WAGES 30 OVERTIME 31 BENEFIT S 32 UNIFORMS 33 SUPPLIES 34 SMALL EQUIPMENT 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36 COMMUNICATIONS 37 TRAVEL 38 EXCISE TAXES 39 RENTALILEASE 40INSURANCE 41 UTILITES 42 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 43 MISCELLANEOUS 44 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 45 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 46 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 47 REVENUE BONDS 48 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 49 INTEREST $ 842,096 $ 168,392 $ 190,522 $ 651,574 239 24,000 5,237 4,561 19,439 199 330,100 71,004 79,936 250,164 249 4,000 2,016 1,221 2,779 319 150,000 18,501 44,060 105,940 299 2,170,000 123,474 262,019 1,907,982 129 170,000 56,175 57,613 112,387 349 11,000 2,327 670 10,330 69 2,237,439 156,098 127,633 2,109,806 69 30,000 6,927 6,709 23,291 229 200 - - 200 09 1,649,700 326,269 318,512 1,331,188 199 152,590 30,980 37,987 114,603 259 107,265 98,196 122,359 (15,094) 1149 35,000 8,854 8,339 26,661 240 176,130 11,030 11,535 164,595 79 123,600 49,272 61,398 62,202 509 645,370 - - 645,370 09 10,000 - - 10,000 09 1,998,334 - 87,212 1,911,122 49 2,870 - - 2,870 09 399,780 - - 399,780 09 25,840 - - 25,840 09 180,580 - - 180,580 09 $ 11,475,894 $ 1,134,754 $ 1,422,285 $ 10,053,609 129 $ 734,284 $ 180,867 $ 196,131 $ 538,153 279 26,000 11,826 7,110 18,890 279 294,767 79,457 80,379 214,388 279 6,500 2,463 4,640 1,860 719 46,000 16,156 19,986 26,014 4M 4,000 304 587 3,413 159 3,481,263 172,800 199,607 3,281,656 69 3,200 1,516 1,091 2,109 349 4,300 - - 4,300 M 470,100 183,707 201,489 268,611 439 267,150 66,330 66,250 200,900 259 144,126 66,228 82,335 61,791 579 10,500 4,497 4,748 5,752 459 67,130 10,963 11,040 56,090 169 232,300 80,395 73,657 158,643 329 297,787 - - 297,787 09 3,137,333 - 194,065 2,943,268 69 104,540 - - 104,540 09 195,390 - - 195,390 M 53,590 - - 53,590 09 101,180 - - 101,180 M $ 9,681,440 $ 877,509 $ 1,143,115 $ 8,538,325 129 O O. d is C O C iL A d R 7 CY N N O N t v c`o 2 27 Packet Pg. 215 1 7.11.a I Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDPTURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent SEWER FUND (423) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,090,461 $ 448,654 $ 467,317 $ 1,623,144 229 2 OVERTIME 95,000 30,002 44,128 50,872 469 3 BENEFITS 847,408 191,235 184,029 663,379 229 4 UNIFORMS 9,500 6,054 4,794 4,706 500 5 SUPPLIES 421,000 118,144 67,115 353,885 169 6 FUEL CONSUMED 60,000 23,413 - 60,000 09 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE 4,000 - - 4,000 09 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 35,000 12,163 89,777 (54,777) 2579 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,315,884 376,542 511,460 1,804,424 229 10 COMMUNICATIONS 43,000 10,467 10,851 32,149 259 11 TRAVEL 5,000 - - 5,000 09 12 EXCISE TAXES 978,000 278,989 217,029 760,971 229 13 RENTALILEASE 317,410 107,477 81,329 236,081 269 14INSURANCE 185,052 162,851 203,936 (18,884) 1109 15 UTILITIES 1,532,060 200,021 364,051 1,168,009 249 16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 790,630 42,222 317,205 473,425 409 17 MISCELLANEOUS 126,350 27,611 44,414 81,936 359 18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 6,388,519 - - 6,388,519 09 19 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 12,520,297 70,424 1,092,673 11,427,624 99 20 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 126,500 - - 126,500 09 21 REVENUE BONDS 89,840 - - 89,840 09 22 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 174,610 15,047 15,397 159,213 99 23 INTEREST 356,980 2,986 2,786 354,194 19 24 DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 1,380 - - 09 25 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COST S - 2,252 2,102 (2,102) 09 $ 29,512,501 $ 2,127,934 $ 3,720,393 $ 25,792,108 1M BOND RESERVEFUND (424) 26 REVENUE BONDS $ 810,010 $ $ $ 810,010 09 27 INTEREST 1,178,700 1,178,700 09 $ 1,988,710 $ $ $ 1,988,710 09 O N R U C ca C LL i N R 7 CI N N O N t 0 L M 9 28 Packet Pg. 216 1 7.11.a I Page 6 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 275,712 $ 68,567 $ 73,548 $ 202,164 274 2 OVERTIME 2,000 1,573 222 1,778 114 3 BENEFITS 112,077 28,958 29,018 83,059 264 4 UNIFORMS 1,500 636 689 811 464 5 SUPPLIES 120,000 14,917 45,415 74,585 384 6 FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 04 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 268,000 49,302 112,225 155,775 424 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 5,154 1,950 56,050 34 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46,750 356 349 46,401 14 10 COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 573 516 2,484 174 11 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 04 12 RENTAL/LEASE 11,160 3,101 2,526 8,634 2M 13 INSURANCE 41,261 39,334 51,903 (10,642) 1264 14 UTILITIES 14,000 5,932 5,850 8,150 424 15 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,000 8,288 9,606 50,394 164 16 MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 1,787 1,441 10,559 124 17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 915,000 50,620 10,903 904,097 14 $ 1,942,460 $ 279,099 $ 346,163 $ 1,596,297 184 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512) 18 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 442,074 $ 85,721 $ 66,179 $ 375,895 154 19 OVERTIME 2,000 707 - 2,000 04 20 BENEFITS 159,538 26,589 26,961 132,577 174 21 SUPPLIES 5,000 1,605 2,075 2,925 414 22 SMALL EQUIPMENT 357,900 8,894 15,261 342,639 44 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61,860 5,723 3,349 58,511 54 24 COMMUNICATIONS 58,770 12,829 12,087 46,683 214 25 TRAVEL 1,500 - - 1,500 04 26 RENTAL/LEASE 7,460 1,100 1,115 6,345 154 27 REPAIRS & MAINT ENANCE 381,920 206,816 375,901 6,019 9M 28 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 246 50 4,950 14 29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - - 56,000 04 $ 1,539,022 $ 350,229 $ 502,978 $ 1,036,044 334 FIREMAN'S PENSION FUND (617) 30 BENEFITS $ - $ 10,457 $ - $ - 04 31 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 15,381 - 04 $ - $ 25,838 $ - $ - 04 TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS $ 144,446,560 $ 16,914,695 $ 22,731,259 $ 121,715,301 164 O CL d is C C LL A N R 3 CY N N 0 N t c� L 2 29 Packet Pg. 217 7.11.a Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F IDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL OFFICE OF MAYOR HUMAN RESOURCES MUNICIPAL COURT CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CITY ATTORNEY NON -DEPARTMENTAL POLICE SERVICES SATELLITE OFFICE COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM PARKS & RECREATION PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE $ 497,900 $ 83,267 $ 71,408 $ 426,492 14% 443,913 83,532 89,568 354,345 20% 824,831 187,141 203,581 621,250 25% 1,368,755 275,717 284,025 1,084,731 21% - 209,183 - - 0%' O 2,034,511 314,260 547,460 1,487,051 27% lL' 971,780 212,467 233,065 738,715 24% 13,877,484 3,679,050 4,088,791 9,788,693 29% O 13,375,470 2,871,535 3,008,075 10,367,395 22% .� LL 166,576 - 21,922 144,654 13% >+ L 719,388 130,319 122,479 596,909 17% R 3,791,859 690,769 909,669 2,882,190 24% CY 459,109 - 25,870 433,239 6% N 5,081,735 971,861 1,040,803 4,040,932 20% 0 N t 3,459,449 784,963 757,219 2,702,230 22% 2,298,775 528,741 562,089 1,736,686 24% 2 $ 49,371,535 $ 11,022,804 $ 11,966,023 $ 37,405,512 24% r_ O CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY Title 2022 Amended Budget 3/31/2021 Expenditures 3/31/2022 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent WATER UTILITYFUND $ 11,475,894 $ 1,134,754 $ 1,422,285 $ 10,053,609 12% STORM UTILITY FUND 9,681,440 877,509 1,143,115 8,538,325 12% SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,512,501 2,127,934 3,720,393 25,792,108 13% BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 - - 1,988,710 0% $ 52,658,545 $ 4,140,196 $ 6,285,793 $ 46,372,752 12% 30 Packet Pg. 218 1 7.11.a I Page 1 of 2 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES O FFIC E O F MAYO R SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES MUNICIPAL C O URT SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES CITY CLERK SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES $ 204,132 $ 50,038 $ 42,890 $ 161,242 21% 121,868 26,196 23,106 98,762 19% 2,000 1,494 236 1,764 12% 169,900 5,538 5,176 164,724 3% $ 497,900 $ 83,267 $ 71,408 $ 426,492 14% $ 232,296 $ 57,374 $ 61,694 $ 170,602 27% 81,787 21,124 21,658 60,129 26% ^+ 1,500 124 1,440 60 96% 0 128,330 4,910 4,777 123,553 4% 0. $ 443,913 $ 83,532 $ 89,568 $ 354,345 20% W R $ 398,299 $ 99,382 $ 116,150 $ 282,149 29% C 142,526 41,117 41,649 100,877 29% 13,600 781 246 13,354 2% 'y 270,406 45,861 45,536 224,870 17% $ 824,831 $ 187,141 $ 203,581 $ 621,250 25% $ 910,606 $ 179,281 $ 192,338 $ 718,268 21% 7 217,654 55,827 54,922 162,732 25% U' 11,600 1,427 2,507 9,093 22% N 228,895 39,182 34,258 194,637 15% N $ 1,368,755 $ 275,717 $ 284,025 $ 1,084,731 21% c� $ - $ 99,613 $ - $ 0% M - 40,838 - 0% v 0 - 403 - 0% O - 68,328 - 0% Q- $ - $ 209,183 $ - $ - 0% ADMINIS TRATIVE S ERVIC ES SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,301,073 $ 185,435 $ 331,842 $ 969,231 26% BENEFITS 413,858 61,588 110,163 303,695 27% SUPPLIES 13,000 1,476 2,729 10,271 21% SERVICES 306,580 65,761 102,725 203,855 34% $ 2,034,511 $ 314,260 $ 547,460 $ 1,487,051 27% CITY ATPO RNEY SERVICES $ 971,780 $ 212,467 $ 233,065 $ 738,715 24% $ 971,780 $ 212,467 $ 233,065 $ 738,715 24% NON -DEPARTMENTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,750 $ - $ - $ 101,750 0% BENEFIT S 145,504 14,707 18,865 126,639 13% SUPPLIES 5,000 29 - 5,000 0% SERVICES 11,860,982 3,614,314 4,019,926 7,841,056 34% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,435,000 50,000 50,000 1,385,000 3% DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL 55,170 - - 55,170 0% DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST 274,078 274,078 0% $ 13,877,484 $ 3,679,050 $ 4,088,791 $ 9,788,693 29% PO LIC E SERVIC ES SALARIES AND WAGES $ 8,723,512 $ 1,885,128 $ 2,001,754 $ 6,721,758 23% BENEFITS 2,994,876 673,000 692,447 2,302,429 23% SUPPLIES 281,569 101,429 28,690 252,879 10% SERVICES 1,375,513 211,978 285,184 1,090,329 21% $ 13,375,470 $ 2,871,535 $ 3,008,075 $ 10,367,395 22% SATELLITE O FFIC E SALARIES AND WAGES $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0% BENEFIT S 5,000 - 5,000 0% SUPPLIES 12,000 10,980 1,020 92% SERVICES 124,576 10,941 113,635 9% $ 166,576 $ $ 21,922 $ 144,654 13% 31 Packet Pg. 219 1 7.11.a I Page 2 of 2 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2022 Amended 3/31/2021 3/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES AND WAGES $ 365,627 $ 81,474 $ 50,441 $ 315,186 14% BENEFITS 111,361 22,889 16,285 95,076 15% SUPPLIES 4,075 47 184 3,891 5% SERVICES 238,325 25,908 55,568 182,757 23% $ 719,388 $ 130,319 $ 122,479 $ 596,909 17% DEVELO PMEVT S ERVIC ES /PLANNING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,978,832 $ 435,823 $ 542,158 $ 1,436,674 27% BENEFITS 681,706 159,746 183,402 498,304 27% SUPPLIES 19,400 1,199 1,366 18,034 7% SERVICES 1,111,921 94,001 182,744 929,177 16% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 0% $ 3,791,859 $ 690,769 $ 909,669 $ 2,882,190 24% HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,496 $ - $ 14,413 $ 87,083 14% BENEFITS 29,113 - 2,888 26,225 10% SUPPLIES 15,000 - 59 14,942 0% SERVICES 313,500 - 8,510 304,990 3% 459,109 25,870 433,239 6% PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,627,863 $ 572,503 $ 571,618 $ 2,056,245 22% BENEFITS 865,945 207,893 202,033 663,912 23% SUPPLIES 166,640 24,689 41,287 125,353 25% SERVICES 1,421,287 166,777 225,866 1,195,421 16% $ 5,081,735 $ 971,861 $ 1,040,803 $ 4,040,932 20% PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION SALARIES AND WAGES $ 387,424 $ 74,845 $ 33,162 $ 354,262 9% BENEFITS 126,689 26,223 16,076 110,613 13% SUPPLIES 9,600 221 1,211 8,389 13% SERVICES 90,400 22,175 20,793 69,607 23% $ 614,113 $ 123,465 $ 71,242 S 542,871 12% FACILITIFS MAINTENANCE SALARIES AND WAGES 860,456 205,470 216,781 643,675 25% BENEFITS 369,679 85,571 84,651 285,028 23% SUPPLIES 128,000 35,839 18,660 109,340 15% SERVICES 670,460 201,861 241,997 428,463 36% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 270,180 - - 270,180 0% $ 2,298,775 $ 528,741 $ 562,089 $ 1,736,686 24% ENGINEERING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,866,128 $ 437,702 $ 461,480 $ 1,404,648 25% BENEFITS 702,578 177,129 173,033 529,545 25% SUPPLIES 2,200 795 - 2,200 0% SERVICES 274,430 45,872 51,464 222,966 19% $ 2,845,336 $ 661,498 $ 685,977 $ 2,159,359 24% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 49,371,535 $ 11,022,804 $ 11,966,023 $ 37,405,512 24% O O. d iC C O C LL i N R 7 CY N N O N t 0 L 9 32 Packet Pg. 220 7.11.a GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- & SUBFUNDS 3/31 /2022 3/31 /2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 001-General Fund ' $ 11,360,317 $ 3,845,555 $ (4,571,033) $ (4,571,033 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 167,132 167,132 (88,086) (88,086 0 011-Risk Management Reserve Fund 25,000 25,000 - - 012-ContingencyReserve Fund 1,782,150 1,782,150 - - 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 16,422 16,421 - - U c 016-Building Maintenance 4,398,737 4,398,737 (1,263) (1,263 c_ 017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation 848,617 848,616 - - u_ 21 Total General Fund & Subfunds $ 18,598,374 $ 11,083,612 $ (4,660,382) $ (4,660,382 a� 1` CY *$8,067,160 of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,782,150 balance in Fund 012, represent the required N 20% operating reserve. N There are no interfund loans outstanding at this time. 1` 0 Q. m GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW LL 21 L L BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES CY GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- c FUNDS 3/31 /2022 3/31 /2022 Q1 — YTD N t Fund Balance Cash Balance 2- General Fund & Subfunds $ 18,598,374 $ 11,083,612 $ (4,660,382) $ (4,660,382 c Special Revenue 19,048,587 17,763,440 669,865 669,865 E Capital Projects 3,291,790 3,541,957 (822,073) (822,073 u 0 Total Governmental Funds $ 40,938,751 $ 32,389,008 1 $ (4,812,590) $ (4,812,590 r Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 33 Packet Pg. 221 7.11.a SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- SPECIAL REVENUE 3/31/2022 3/31/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund $ 75,753 $ 76,253 $ 578 $ 578 111 - Street Fund 660,527 521,942 (290,638) (290,638 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 2,910,339 2,020,380 671,892 671,892 Q. 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 713,169 716,631 64,290 64,290 W 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 82,524 69,286 11,410 11,410 6 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 84,770 85,164 8,246 8,246 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 14,369 14,442 110 110 123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 103,170 99,104 7,199 7,199 u_ 125 - Real Estate Tax2 4,057,799 3,982,914 4,384 4,384 21 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 * 3,603,484 3,432,398 290,145 290,145 r 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 364,993 366,576 63,468 63,468 130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 272,218 273,627 6,013 6,013 CY 136 - Parks Trust Fund 169,884 170,751 1,294 1,294 c 137- Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 1,121,106 1,126,803 14,031 14,031 138- Sister City Comm ission 15,599 15,679 119 119 L 140 -Business Improvement Disrict 55,442 55,442 26,311 26,311 141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing I'd 182,448 175,055 23,034 23,034 142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 4,540,205 4,540,205 (232,175) V_ (232,175 143 -Tree Fund 20,789 20,789 157 157 m Total Special Revenue $ 19,048,587 $ 17,763,440 $ 669,865 $ 669,865 *$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $500,000 for 'u the purchase of Open Space. ii ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW L 1= CU N N O BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES t ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- ENTERPRISE FUNDS 3/31/2022 3/31/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance c m E 421 -Water Utility Fund $ 29,858,598 $ 7,626,106 $ 1,131,430 $ 1,131,430 U 422 -Storm Utility Fund " 16,488,793 6,446,043 841,415 841,415 Q 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 61,776,908 17,162,548 1,424,379 1,424,379 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 843,964 843,964 3 3 411 -Combined Utility Operation 46,790 92,550 46,790 46,790 Total Enterprise Funds $ 109,015,052 $ 32,171,212 $ 3,444,017 $ 3,444,017 *$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding. *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 34 Packet Pg. 222 7.11.a SUMMARY OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- CITY-WIDE 3/31/2022 3/31/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance Governmental Funds $ 40,938,751 $ 32,389,008 $ (4,812,590) $ (4,812,590 Enterprise Funds 109,015,052 32,171,212 3,444,017 3,444,017 0 Internal Services Fund 10,193,906 5,768,972 (93,646) (93,646 0. Total City-wide Total $ 160,147,709 $ 70,329,192 $ (1,462,219) $ (1,462,219 U c c� c ii 21 a� INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW N N O N L V L C� G BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES o INTERNAL SERVICE ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- 0. FUNDS 3/31/2022 3/31/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance c 511 - Equipment Rental Fund $ 9,326,031 $ 5,074,155 $ 117,520 $ 117,520 u_ 21 512 -Technology Rental Fund 867,875 694,817 (211,166) (211,166 Total Internal Service Funds $ 10,193,906 $ 5,768,972 $ (93,646) $ (93,646 CY N O N L V L C� G d E t V Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 35 Packet Pg. 223 7.11.b GENERAL FUND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE 2021 2022 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 (Jan -March) (Jan -March) Beginning Fund Balance 9,841,719 10,273,342 11,233,279 15,552,188 13,868,744 13,868,744 15,931,353 Revenue Taxes Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment earnings Miscellaneous Operating Revenues Nononeratine Revenues Transfers in Debt proceeds Sale of capital assets Insurance recoveries Total Revenue Expenditures General government Public safety Transportation Economic environment Mental and physical health Culture and recreation Debt service Capital outlay Operating Expenditures Nononeratine Expenditures Transfers out Debt refunding Total Expenditures Prior Period Adjustments Change in position 29,572,203 30,755,578 30,846,665 30,738,452 32,979,704 4,734,587 5,337,614 2,506,800 2,401,855 2,299,972 2,276,861 2,453,186 555,153 666,258 890,572 1,014,434 1,008,432 1,633,633 1,608,646 607,758 209,486 5,463,913 5,810,961 6,419,836 5,412,044 5,913,557 930,658 1,004,658 459,929 616,783 496,093 287,693 272,302 87,542 30,353 154,737 273,228 573,806 265,627 122,241 73,213 77,209 471,675 931,495 587,882 322,816 310,902 62,038 69,412 39,519,829 41,804,334 42,232,686 40,937,126 43,660,538 7,050,949 7,394,990 26,300 75,884 4,793,650 1,535,800 425,164 - 7,143 5,273 - - - - 15,570 - 16,977 - - - 39,553,272 41,901,061 47,026,336 42,489,903 44,085,702 7,050,949 7,394,990 9,714,867 10,288,694 11,565,563 12,514,526 11,850,838 3,311,792 3,492,861 22,228,871 22,585,212 23,036,185 23,759,212 22,765,260 6,259,160 6,803,024 3,600 4,779 5,012 5,012 2,088 1,253 - 1,551,152 1,460,763 1,562,702 1,675,334 1,991,624 425,657 576,185 126,791 178,859 164,888 147,957 84,642 3,053 3,122 3,959,731 4,331,806 4,158,397 3,732,644 4,341,658 1,021,889 1,090,831 198,361 197,694 197,967 296,624 60,228 - - 90,573 93,105 110,935 835,048 268,885 - - 37,873,946 39,140,912 40,801,649 42,966,358 41,365,223 1,247,703 1,800,212 1,905,778 1,206,990 657,870 11,022,804 11,966,023 39,121,649 40,941,124 42,707,427 44,173,348 42,023,093 11,022,804 11,966,023 431,623 959,937 4,318,909 (1,683,445) 2,062,609 (3,971,855) (4,571,033) Ending Fund Balance 10,273,342 11,233,279 15,552,188 13,868,744 15,931,353 9,896,889 11,360,321 ON O a� c ca c ii , L L 3 CY N N O N t V L C� G J 06 d N N O N L V L C� G i d i Q R:\Finance Committee\2022\Jan-March 2022 P&L 5/4/2022 Packet Pg. 224 7.12 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 4th of July, Taste Edmonds, Car Show Event Agreements Staff Lead: Shannon Burley Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Shannon Burley Background/History The Council authorizes Event Agreements on behalf the City of Edmonds. In 2021 the special events of Summer Market, SpringFest, Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July, Taste Edmonds and the Classic Car Show all took place. Council has previously authorized the Summer Market, SpringFest and the Edmonds Arts Festival. On May 10, 2022 the Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed the Event Agreements for the 4th of July Celebration, Taste Edmonds and the Classic Car Show and recommended they move to the May 17, 2022 Council Consent Agenda. Staff Recommendation Approve the Event Agreements between the City of Edmonds and Chamber of Commerce for the 4th of July Celebration (attached), Taste Edmonds (attached) and the Classic Car Show (attached). Approval will authorize the Mayor to sign the contracts. Narrative 4th of July Event Agreement: This year there will be no fireworks on the 4th of July due to Civic Park construction. The Chamber has opted to support the Mountlake Terrace Fireworks display on July 3, 2022. The attached 4th of July agreement outlines details for the use of City Streets, sidewalks, parking and City Park to support the planned Beat the Brackett Race (both a 5K and 1K) and the Parade which will include the Children's Parade this year (cancelled due to Covid in 2021). Taste Edmonds Event Agreement: A Seafair Sanctioned Community Event, Taste Edmonds will take place Friday, August 19 - Sunday, August 21. Taste Edmonds is the Chamber of Commerce's largest fundraising event each year with revenues supporting multiple free events such as Halloween, the Holiday Tree Lighting, and the 4th of July Parade. The mix of live music, beer garden and food has a long standing history in Edmonds. In 2022 the event will remain at the Frances Anderson Center and be reduced in size due to the renovation of Civic Park. The event will feature food trucks / food vendors on 8th Avenue between Main St. and Dayton with live music and beer garden on the field. The event will be an all ages event with children's programming in the bandshell. This year the event will end an hour earlier in response to notice concerns in the neighborhood. Packet Pg. 225 7.12 Classic Car Show Event Agreement: This one -day event will be held on Sunday, September 11, 2022 and is largely the same as in previous years. The event will utilize several streets downtown to showcase classic cars. The event is free and open to the public. New this year, the Chamber will pay for one officer to be on -site throughout the day. The Chamber is required to comply with all noise ordinances, COVID guidelines and recycling/composting ordinances throughout the events. Further they are required to provide sufficient ADA parking, comply with Fire Marshall festival guidance and ensure the public spaces be left in good condition. The contracts have been reviewed and approved by our internal team (Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services, Development Services, Human Resources (risk management) and Economic Development Departments) and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Attachments: 2022 Taste Edmonds Event Agreement 2022 Classic Car Show Event Agreement 2022 July 4 Event Agreement Packet Pg. 226 7.12.a EVENT AGREEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE August 17-22, 2022 THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and the GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as the "Chamber") (collectively, the "Parties"). WHEREAS, the Chamber has for a number of years sponsored a public event known as Taste Edmonds and proposes to do so again in 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that Taste Edmonds provides distinct benefits to local businesses and helps raise necessary funding to support events such as Halloween, 4th of July and the Holiday Tree Lighting, while providing a unique recreational opportunity for its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such an event enhances tourism and promotes economic development as well as providing an opportunity for good clean fun to its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the considerations the City provides are more than adequately recompensed by the promises of the Chamber and the public benefit to be derived from this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, covenants, conditions and performances set forth below, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Responsibilities of the City (certain Chamber obligations included). 1.1 The City will provide use of the Frances Anderson Center playfield, bandshell and plaza area behind the bandshell, 8th Avenue between Main Street and Dayton Street (See Exhibit A) and parking spaces on the North side of Dayton (See Exhibit B) (hereinafter referred to as the City -Provided Site") for use as the venue for Taste Edmonds (hereinafter referred to as the "Event"), and agrees to the following: 1.1.1 No Parking Signs placed on the West Side of 8th Avenue and on Dayton by Monday, August 15, 2022 at 8 a.m. 1.1.2 The Event setup will begin on Wednesday, August 17, 2022, at 8:00 a.m. Barricades, ADA and loading zone signs to be in place at 8:00 a.m. 1.1.3 The Event will run from 12:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Friday, August 19, 2022; 12:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. Saturday August 20, 2022 and 12:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. on Sunday, August 21, 2022. 1.1.4 All surfaces listed will remain available to the Event until final cleanup, to be completed by Monday, August 22, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. Packet Pg. 227 7.12.a 1.1.5 The City will designate five (5) additional handicapped parking spaces to be located along Dayton Street near the Event entrance (See Exhibit A). 1.2 The City may sprinkle the field prior to the Event to reduce dust. The playfield irrigation system will be turned off by 8:00 a.m. on August 17, 2022. The Chamber may cover the infield dirt with a tarp but will not place tarps on the grass. 1.3 All use and configuration of structures, booths and other permanent or temporary facilities used in the Event must comply with the "Food Vendor & Festival Requirements" set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Such structures, booths and facilities may be inspected and reviewed by the City Fire Chief, Police Chief, Building Official and Parks and Recreation Director or their designees to determine whether the facilities in use comply with the provisions of Exhibit C and state and local law, as well as to ensure that no lasting or permanent damage will be done to any public facility or property. 1.4 Edmonds Fire Marshal will inspect the facilities and all food trucks prior to the opening to the general public on or before 12:00 p.m., August 19, 2022, as the Parties will agree and note all potential problems. Prior to the opening of the Event, the Chamber will correct all problems related to fire safety. In the event that such problems are not corrected, the City may at its sole discretion cancel the Event or prohibit the attendance of the general public in certain areas, if in the opinion of the Fire Marshal and at the sole discretion of the City, any violation or other condition that threatens life, health or property has not been corrected. 1.5 Alcohol may be served, so long as the Chamber obtains all required state licenses and approvals to serve alcohol. These will be furnished to the City at least two (2) weeks prior to the event. 1.6 The City will provide safety barriers and road closure signs near the following two (2) locations for street closures required to contain the City -Provided Site described in Paragraph 1.1 and identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: 1.6.1 8th Avenue at Main Street, to close 8th Avenue 1.6.2 8th Avenue at Dayton Street, to close 8th Avenue 1.7 The City will provide five (5) official handicapped parking signs and two (2) loading zone signs on Main Street and Dayton Street as identified in Exhibit B. In addition, the North side of Dayton from 8th Ave west to the ADA parking spot will be marked "No Parking" August 17, 2022 at 8:00 a.m. through August 22, 2022 at 12:00 p.m., as identified in Exhibit B. One "Local Access Only" sign will be provided for the corner of Dayton and 8th Avenue. 2 Packet Pg. 228 7.12.a 1.8 The City may install Taste Edmonds street banners as provided by the Chamber at approved sites. The Chamber will obtain a Street Banner Permit and pay the required fee. 1.9 The City has the right to check the noise level of any amplified sound equipment or other source and require that the volume be reduced if it exceeds the safety limits recommended by the Seattle King County Department of Health or levels set forth in the ordinances of the City of Edmonds. 1.10 The City will provide and oversee police supervision of the Event under the command of the Chief of Police or his/her designee. Police staffing levels and fees to be paid to the City will be mutually determined by the Chief of Police, or his/her designee, and the President and CEO of the Chamber. 1.11 The City will supply a list of acceptable compostable and recyclable food ware items and of suppliers for the compostable items. The City will provide signage for the on - site collection containers, and any additional containers, if needed. 1.12 The Chamber must supply power as needed. A Chamber representative and a City w Public Works representative will meet prior to July 27, 2022, to draw up an exterior N electrical plan. The City Electrician will have final say in all electrical matters. No I ground penetrations are allowed unless authorized first by the City Electrician and City Parks Department. Any unauthorized ground penetrations may be subject to fine and/or damage cost recovery from the Chamber. 4- ° v 1.13 The Chamber is not authorized to fasten anything to the buildings, structures or trees. c Doing so may result in damage cost recovery and/or fine. 2. Responsibilities of the Chamber 2.1 Insurance: The Chamber will provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the following insurance: General Liability insurance will be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 covering premises, operations, products -completed operations and contractual liability. The City of Edmonds will be named as an additional insured on the Chamber's General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured -Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or an endorsement providing at least as broad coverage. The General Liability insurance will be written with limits no less than $2,000,000 each occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate. The insurance policy will contain, or be endorsed to contain, that the Chamber's insurance coverage will be primary insurance as respect the city of Edmonds. Any insurance, self-insurance, or self -insured pool coverage maintained by the city of Edmonds will be excess of the Chamber's insurance and will not contribute with it. Packet Pg. 229 7.12.a In the event that the Chamber's employees and/or volunteers provide the service of alcohol at the event, the Chamber's General Liability insurance will also include host liquor liability coverage. However, if the Chamber contracts with a third -party vendor or vendors to provide all service of alcohol, the Chamber will be responsible for obtaining a Certificate of Insurance from all vendor(s) confirming that the vendor(s) have Liquor Liability coverage, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 in the aggregate per vendor. The City will be named as an additional insured on any third -party vendor(s)' Liquor Liability policies and copies of all endorsement(s) naming the City as an additional insured will be attached to the Chamber's Certificate of Insurance. The Chamber will provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the required insurance before using the premises described herein. Insurance will be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than ANII. 2.2 The Chamber agrees that Taste Edmonds is a public event. The Chamber further 0 agrees that areas constituting the City -Provided Site that are covered under this 06 Agreement, including but not limited to public rights of way, streets, sidewalks, parks, parking lots, gardens, meeting halls and squares, are traditional public forums. 0 As a result, the Chamber will permit citizens attending events open to the general w public at the City -Provided Site during the Event to exercise therein their protected r constitutional right to free speech without interference in a designated free speech zone that does not violate fire and ADA codes. ~ 21 2.3 The Chamber will provide security services necessary during the day time hours o (day time hours being defined as those hours which the Event is in operation), sufficient to reasonably secure the area and facilities provided. The City will have no responsibility or liability for the provision of security services nor will it be liable for any loss or damage incurred by the Chamber or the participants in the Event. E 2.4 Chapter 6.80 of the Edmonds City Code ("Plastic Bag Reduction") restricts the use of single -use plastic checkout bags. The restrictions do not apply to plastic bags used to carry out cooked food or provided solely for produce, bulk food or meat. The Chamber will encourage its vendors to comply with the purposes of the ordinance by utilizing paper bags or encouraging the use of reusable totes whenever practicable. 2.4 Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 70.93.093 concerning event recycling, the Chamber will place clearly marked recycling containers throughout the Event area for the collection of aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles and other recyclable materials from Event participants. The Chamber will be responsible for providing recycling, compost, and garbage collection and removal services (see also Section 2.5, below). 2.5 Pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 6.90 ("Noncompostable Food Service Containers Prohibition") and 6.95 ECC ("Single -Use Plastic Utensils — Prohibition"), which prohibit the use of non-compostable food service containers and single -use plastic utensils (such as plastic straws, stirrers and cutlery) at public events requiring a Packet Pg. 230 7.12.a contract with the City, the Chamber will ensure that food vendors at this public event provide only compostable food service containers and utensils, as defined in Chapters 6.90 and 6.95 ECC, to Event participants. Aluminum and steel cans, plastic bottles and certain plastic cups that are accepted as recyclable continue to be acceptable for vendor use. The Chamber will provide for the on -site collection of compostable and recyclable materials from Event participants, using designated color -coded collection containers. The Chamber will ensure that on -site collection containers are serviced properly and continually during the Event. A Chamber representative will meet with the City's Recycling Coordinator or representative prior to August 1, 2022, in order to be educated on the 3-container system to maximize diversion of compostable and recyclable materials from the garbage, and the City will work to identify mutually agreed upon locations for food waste stations. These stations will be identified on Event maps and website. 2.6 Indemnification: The Chamber will defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, U 06 officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including attorney fees, arising from or in connection with o the Chamber's performance, or nonperformance, of this Agreement, except to the E extent that claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits are caused by the sole w negligence of the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. This promise N to indemnify and hold harmless will include a waiver by the Chamber of the immunity provided under Title 51 RCW, but only to the extent necessary to fully effectuate this promise. This provision will survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 0 v 2.7 The Chamber may in its discretion limit the participation of any vendor who c produces duplication in order to adequately recognize limitations of space, failure to E comply with applicable State or local health, liquor, or other requirements of law, and in order to provide an adequate and interesting diversity compatible with the t recreation of the citizens of Edmonds. 2.8 Neither the Chamber nor any of its officers, agents, or employees will discriminate in the provision of service under this Agreement against any individual, partnership, or corporation based upon race, religion, sex, creed, place of origin, or any other form of discrimination prohibited by federal, state or local law. 2.9 The Parties acknowledge that, pursuant to the provisions Chapter 70.160 RCW (herein after the "smoking ban"), smoking is prohibited in indoor areas, within 25 feet of vents or entrances and in outdoor areas where public employees of the City, and employees of any vendor at the Event or of the Chamber are required to be. This general description of the provisions of the statute is included for the purpose of reference and is not intended to expand or contract the obligations created by the smoking ban. The Chamber warrants that it will comply with the smoking ban and will utilize the services and advice of the Snohomish County Health District in assuring compliance during the Event described in this Agreement. Packet Pg. 231 7.12.a 2.10 The Chamber will post "NO DOGS" signs on the City -Provided Site per Chapter 5.05 of the Edmonds City Code ("Animal Control"). The Chamber will notify vendors of this requirement as part of their registration instructions, and also inform vendors that this requirement will be enforced. This provision will not apply to service animals for the disabled. 2.11 The Chamber will ensure that all vendors have the necessary state permits for serving and selling alcohol. The Chamber intends to allow Event attendees of all ages, and agrees to make its best effort to prevent service of alcohol to minors, including appropriate fencing around the Event, —posting security at the entrances of the and checking identification in accordance with common practice. Required fencing, is addressed at Section 2.17, below. 2.12 The Chamber will obtain any copyright licenses necessary for presenting licensed live and recorded music. 2.13 The Chamber agrees to the following general open hours of Taste Edmonds: Friday, August 19, 2022: 12:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. Last call 8:30 p.m., no service after 8:45 p.m. Saturday, August 20, 2022: 12:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. Last call 8:30 p.m., no service after 8:45 p.m. Sunday, August 21, 2022: 12:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. Last call 7:30 p.m., no service after 7:45 p.m. 2.14 The Chamber will provide any and all security services necessary during the night time hours (night time hours being defined as those hours which the Event is not in operation), sufficient to reasonably secure the area and facilities provided. The City will have no responsibility or liability for the provision of security services nor will it be liable for any loss or damage incurred by the Chamber or the participants in the Event. 2.15 The Chamber will provide a fire watch for all times the Event is open to the general public. The Fire Marshal or representative may inspect the Playfield and Amphitheater with the Chamber CEO or designated representative, prior to 12:00 p.m., Friday, August 19, 2022. 2.16 The Chamber will provide a sufficient number of portable sani-cans and wash stations. 2.17 The Chamber will provide fence installation and removal at the Frances Anderson Center to include along the center line of 8th Avenue for street closure, ensuring the East side of the street remains available to local access and emergency vehicles, and any Beer Garden and Wine Garden fencing as required by law. N 0 t v Packet Pg. 232 7.12.a 2.18 The Chamber is responsible for contracting with appropriate vendors for electrical power. No power is available at the Frances Anderson Center field. 2.19 The Chamber will arrange for a walk-through with the City electrician and obtain approval for the accommodation of power and electricity needs. 2.20 Garbage service will be contracted and paid for by the Chamber. 2.21 The Chamber will be responsible for restoring the City -Provided Site to its original condition including steam cleaning and pressure washing whenever required for all hard surfaces impacted by the Event. A Chamber representative will meet with a member of the City's Parks and Recreation Department prior to August 17, 2022 and on August 22, 2022 to inspect the City -Provided Site to document the "original" and "post event" conditions of the Frances Anderson Center outside areas. 2.22 Cleanup areas include the City -Provided Site as described in paragraph 1.1 and all streets immediately surrounding the Event perimeter. 2.23 All garbage to the size of a cigarette butt, debris, litter, equipment, and any and all w other items made necessary by or used in the provision of the Event will be picked N up and removed by 12:00 p.m., Monday, August 22, 2022. 1 2.24 Damage Deposit: The Chamber will submit a cleaning/damage deposit of $1,500.00 to the City prior to Monday, July 18, 2022. The deposit will be refunded to the ° Chamber if, upon inspection, all is in order, or a prorated portion thereof as may be v necessary to reimburse the City for loss or cleaning costs. 2.25 Fees: The Chamber will pay the City $1,250.00 for the use of the City -Provided Site prior to Monday, July 18, 2022, and will reimburse the City for the actual costs of supplies or services furnished by the City, unless otherwise established, within thirty (30) days of mailing of a final bill by the City. 2.26 Notices. All requests for additional services and concerns of the Chamber will be directed by the Chamber President to the City's designated representative, Parks Deputy Director 425-771-0232. 2.27 The Chamber will insure that: 2.27.1 Kilns, barbecues, forges and other sources of heat will be insulated from turfed areas to prevent the heat from killing the grass and sterilizing the soil. All heat producing appliances will be approved by the Fire Department and may require conditions for their acceptable use. Food vendor installations will be inspected prior to the Event opening. Tarps, tents, canopies and covers will be listed and labeled for flame resistance. 2.27.2 Vehicles will only be allowed on the grass areas to load and unload, with adjacent streets used for parking during the Event. Packet Pg. 233 7.12.a 2.27.3 The Chamber will notify all individual residents of the affected areas of 8th Avenue and provide general notice to all the citizens of the closure of 8th Avenue. 2.27.4 Tents must be held down with sandbags and not stakes. 3. Miscellaneous 3.1 Entire agreement, integration and amendment. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties relating to the rights and obligations created hereby, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, understandings, and agreements, written or oral, between the Parties. Any prior discussions or understandings are deemed merged with the provisions herein. This Agreement will not be amended, assigned or otherwise changed or transferred except in writing with the express written consent of the Parties hereto. Any action to interpret or enforce this Agreement will be brought before the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington, and the Parties agree that, as between them, all matters will be resolved in that venue. 3.2 Force majeure. The Parties will not be liable for failure to perform or delay in performance due to fire, flood, strike or other labor difficulty, act of God, act of any governmental authority, riot, embargo, fuel or energy shortage, car shortage, wrecks or delays in transportation, or due to any other cause beyond the Parties' reasonable control. In the event of delay in performance due to any such cause, the date of delivery or time for completion will be extended by a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of such delay. 3.3 Relationship between the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted to or in fact create an agency or employment relationship between the Parties. No officer, official, agent, employee or representative of the Chamber will be deemed to be the same of the City for any purpose. The Chamber alone will be solely responsible for all acts of its officers, officials, agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 3.4 Compliance with laws. The Chamber in the performance of this Agreement will comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and ordinances, including all applicable public health and safety guidelines and all requirements of the federal government, the State of Washington, and the City related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The most recent information regarding the applicable state and federal guidelines and requirements relating to the COVID-19 pandemic can be found on the Washington State coronavirus response webpage at www.coronavirus.wa.gov and on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov. The Governor's Spectator Events COVID-19 Requirements, which contains hyperlinks to related resources and any updates to its requirements, may be found at: https://www. govemor.wa. gov/sites/default/files/COVID 19%20Spectator%20Event%20Guidance pdd£ The Chamber will consult this information regularly during the course of the event to ensure that the latest guidelines and requirements are promptly implemented. 3.5 Non -Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any other provision. s Packet Pg. 234 7.12.a 3.6 Termination. Each and every term and condition herein set forth and contained in this Agreement are expressly made terms, covenants, agreements and conditions, and a breach of any one of them by the Chamber will constitute a breach of this Agreement. In the event the Chamber fails to comply with any of the terms, covenants, agreements or conditions of this Agreement, or in the event the Chamber violates any local, city, county, state, or federal law, in connection with the Event, upon giving the Chamber twenty-four (24) hours' advance written notice, the City may terminate this Agreement. Provided, the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director may order the Chamber to cease operation of the Event hereunder immediately at any time should the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director determine that the Event is detrimental to public safety, health, or welfare. Such a determination may be made in relation to COVID-19 or to any other public safety, health or welfare issue. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all the rights, licenses, and privileges herein contained will be terminated, the Chamber will have no further rights hereunder, and the City may require the immediate removal of all property of the Chamber and its vendors from the City - Provided Site. DATED this day of 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS: GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Mike Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Greg Urban, President and CEO 9 Packet Pg. 235 7.12.a Exhibit A 2022 Taste Edmonds Site Plan 1.1 WWI � 6[ X X f � Y� „4 1 X W m Cif A p 0 Al f 7CL 0 Nan tir:G ,1.. m m -J W O i C NCD AI .... C CD b y -Ilk,'f } J b0. lP Lo al Assess Only 10 Packet Pg. 236 7.12.a Exhibit B 2022 Taste Edmonds Traffic Control Plan c a� E a� a� L a w 3 O t L U 06 c O E W O N R H 3 O t r.+ C N E d d L tM a W 0 E w a� N N O N �.i C d E t t� r Q Packet Pg. 237 7.12.a Exhibit C South County Fire' Food Vendor & Festival Requirements Fire Lane - A 20 ft Fire Lane must be maintained for emergency vehicle access. - Unobstructed access to Fire hydrants shall be maintained at all times. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining immediate access for rendering aid or to fire protection equipment or fire hydrants (IFC 507.5.4) Tents and Other Membrane Structures - All tents, canopies, and other membrane structures erected shall meet the requirements of the current edition of NFPA 701 and the IFC Section 3103 and 3104 and shall be labeled fire resistive. - Tents need to be less than 400 sq ft or additional permit maybe required. - Inflatable play equipment and all membrane structures shall be properly installed per the manufacturer instructions Fire Extinquishers - 5-lbs. Portable ABC type extinguisher is required in all booths with current annual inspection/service tag attached. - Booths with deep fat fryers also require a Class "K" rated fire extinguisher with current annual inspection/service tag attached. - Hood suppression systems MUST have current inspection documentation. - Keep fire extinguishers accessible and conspicuous. Cooking M H - No candles or open flame devices like tiki torches. - No flaming food. - Barbecue pits need a 10' separation from combustibles and portable FE. 4- - Open flame from cooking devices shall be enclosed in such a manner as to prevent the flame from contacting any t combustible material and shall be placed on a non-combustible surface. le - All combustibles shall be kept away from heat sources. }, - No cooking appliances/heat sources will be within physical reach of the general public. r_ Electrical Cords - Minimum size 12-2 with ground UL approved outdoor rated from power feed source, 14-2 with ground UL approved is allowed elsewhere. - All cords shall be free of splices, cuts or breaks in outer sheathing. - UL or other approved Strip Plugs with integral circuit breaker are the only allowed power tap/adapter. Booth Construction - Cooking booth construction shall be labeled fire resistive. - Non -rated blue, green or brown plastic tarps are not allowed over cooking areas. Rubbish - Keep combustible rubbish in closed containers. - Cardboard boxes are rubbish/not rubbish containers. - Rubbish containers larger than 40 gallons must be labeled fire -resistive. Fuel Use/Storage - All tanks/cylinders (whether in use or storage) must be secured to avoid falling and damaging the valve assembly - No smoking in or around cooking/fuel use or storage areas. - Store tanks/cylinders upright so pressure relief valve is in vapor space. - Fuel tank/cylinder storage/Use is limited to one day's supply, quantity at the discretion of Fire Marshal. Fire District 1 (South County Fire), 12425 Meridian Avenue S, Everett, WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 / www.firedistrictl.org 12 Packet Pg. 238 7.12.b EVENT AGREEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND THE GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and the GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as the "Chamber") (collectively, the "Parties"). WHEREAS, the Chamber has for many years held a public event known as the Edmonds Classic Car & Motorcycle Show ("Classic Car Show" or "Event"); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the "Classic Car Show" provides distinct benefits to the City by showcasing the City while providing a unique recreational opportunity for its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such an event enhances tourism and promotes economic development as well as providing an opportunity for good clean fun to its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, covenants, conditions and performances set forth below, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Resbonsibilities of the Citv: >; 1.1 City will provide use of the following surfaces by Chamber for the Classic Car ° Show as shown in Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the "City -Provided Site"): "Center Round" around the fountain in downtown Edmonds at 5th Avenue and Main Street, ii. Main Street from the East side of its intersection with 3rd Avenue to the West side of its intersection with 0h Avenue, iii. 4th Avenue from the South side of its intersection with Bell Street to the North side of its intersection with Dayton Street, and again from the South side of its intersection with Dayton Street to approximately 100 feet south down 4th Avenue, iv. 5th Avenue, from the North side of its intersection with Walnut Street to the South side of its intersection of the northern leg of Bell Street, v. Dayton Street, from the West side of 5th Avenue to the East side of 4th Avenue, vi. Dayton Street, from the East side of 5th Avenue to immediately east of 529 Dayton Street, Packet Pg. 239 7.12.b vii. City Hall parking lot located immediately South of the City Hall building at 121 5th Avenue N and the parking lot under City Hall, viii. On street parking spaces on 5th Ave N from Bell Street to Seville driveway, 217 5th Ave N (west), and Bell Street to the Public Safety parking lot access midblock (east). 1.2 City will place "no parking" signs a minimum of 72 hours before the Event, which is scheduled for Sunday, September 11, 2022, so as to clear the City -Provided Site of all vehicles from 2:00 a.m. on the date of the Event until 7:00 p.m. on the same day. The Main and 5th closure to the most northern portion of Bell will be until 8:00 P.M. 1.3 City will provide barriers near the following 17 locations for street closures required to contain the City -Provided Site described in Paragraph 1.1 and identified in Exhibit A: 1.3.1 Pine and 5th, to close 5th Avenue north to Walnut, controlling northbound traffic. Northbound will reopen at 11:30 am following registration. 1.3.2 Howell and 5th, to Walnut, controlling southbound traffic. Southbound will reopen at 10:00 am following registration. 1.3.3 Walnut and 5th, to close Sth Avenue north and south of Walnut Street 1.3.4 Alder and 5th, to close Alder Street east of Sth Avenue 1.3.5 Maple and 5th, to close Maple Street east of 5th Avenue 1.3.6 On 0, to close 4th Avenue south of Dayton 1.3.7 4th and Dayton, to close Dayton at 4th 1.3.8 Dayton Street immediately east of 529 Dayton Street to close Dayton West of this point 1.3.9 Main and 6th, to close Main Street west of 6th Avenue 1.3.10 6th and the Alley between Bell Street and Main Street (local access only) 1.3.11 5th and the Alley to the South of Museum, to close 5th Avenue N 1.3.12 Alley between 4th Avenue N and 5th Avenue N and Main Street to block traffic from entering Main Street a Packet Pg. 240 7.12.b 1.3.13 Main and 3rd, to close Main Street east of 3rd Avenue 1.3.14 4th and Bell, to close 4th Avenue N south of Bell Street 1.3.15 Alley between 4th Avenue N and 5th Avenue N and Bell Street (local access only) 1.3.16 5th and Bell, to close 5th Avenue N south of Bell Street 1.3.17 5th and Bell, to close 5th Avenue N (south side of Centennial Plaza) 4 The intersection of 5th Avenue South at Walnut Street will remain open to general traffic east and west, but access will be controlled and may be limited to allow for safe staging of Event vehicles. There will be an event volunteer at the intersection to designate which vehicles will be part of the Event and aid east and west traffic through the intersection. 1.5 City shall arrange for one police officer to work the event from approximately 7 am w until the conclusion of the event (exact times to be decided mutually between the Chamber and the Edmonds Police Department). Chamber will be responsible for paying the actual cost of the overtime wages incurred by the City of the police officer. 0 1.6 City will deliver barriers so as to allow Chamber to position such barriers at 5:00ii a.m. the day of the Event. The number of barriers left by City at each of the eight : locations will be sufficient to provide adequate street closure. a 1.7 City has the right to check the noise level of any amplified sound equipment or other source and require that the volume be reduced if it exceeds the safety limits recommended by the Snohomish County Department of Health or levels set forth in the ordinances of the City of Edmonds. 2. Responsibilities of the Chamber: 2.1 On the day of the Event, Chamber will place traffic cones on the center -dividing line of 5th Avenue between Pine Street and Walnut Street from 5:00 a.m. until 10:00 a.m. 2.2 Chamber will remove barriers at 7:00 p.m. to reopen intersections after first checking with the officer on duty and receiving confirmation that it is safe to do so. 2.3 Police, Fire, and Public Works will meet with Chamber of Commerce officials to resolve any remaining or potential issues of traffic control and barricades prior to the Event, but will have no authority to waive the requirements of city ordinance or state law. Packet Pg. 241 2.4 Chamber will establish a sixteen -foot (16') fire lane down the middle of each street on which Classic Car Show cars will be parked for emergency vehicle access throughout the day of event. Chamber car show staff and ambassadors will ensure that no cars encroach upon this fire lane. 2.5 All use and configuration of structures, booths and other temporary facilities used in the Event must comply with the "Food Vendor & Festival Requirements" set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Such structures, booths and facilities will be inspected and reviewed by Edmonds Fire Marshal, Police Chief, Building Official and Parks and Recreation Director or their designees to determine whether the facilities in use comply with the provisions of State and local law, as well as to ensure that no lasting or permanent damage will be done to any public facility or property. Edmonds Fire Marshal will inspect the facilities prior to the opening to the general public on or before 7:00 a.m., September 11, 2022, as the Parties will agree and note all potential problems. Prior to the opening of the event, Chamber will correct all problems. In the event that such problems are not corrected, City may at its sole discretion cancel such Event or prohibit the attendance of the general public in certain areas, if in the opinion of the Fire Marshal and at the sole discretion of City, anything that threatens life, health or property appears. 2.6 Chamber will provide a fire watch for all times in and around the booths and displays open to the general public as a part of this Event. c 2.7 Chamber will obtain and note on the back of the Classic Car Show registration card, which is posted on the dashboard of cars on display, at least one cell phone number for the car's owner, to allow the Chamber to contact the owners when away from their cars. as 2.8 Insurance: The Chamber shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the following insurance: General Liability insurance will be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 covering premises, operations, products - completed operations and contractual liability. The City of Edmonds will be named as an additional insured on the Chamber's General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured -Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or an endorsement providing at least as broad coverage. The General Liability insurance will be written with limits no less than $2,000,000 each occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate. The insurance policy will contain, or be endorsed to contain, that the Chamber's insurance coverage will be primary insurance as respect the City of Edmonds. Any insurance, self-insurance, or self -insured pool coverage maintained by the City of Edmonds will be excess of the Chamber's insurance and will not contribute with it. Packet Pg. 242 7.12.b The Chamber will provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the required insurance before using the premises described herein. Insurance will be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than ANII. 2.9 The Chamber agrees that the Classic Car Show is a public event. The Chamber further agrees that areas constituting the City -Provided Site that are covered under this Agreement, including but not limited to public right of way, streets, sidewalks, parks, parking lots, gardens, meeting halls and squares, are traditional public forums. As a result, the Chamber will permit citizens attending events open to the general public at City -Provided Site during the Classic Car Show to exercise therein their protected constitutional right to free speech without interference. 2.10 Chapter 6.80 of the Edmonds City Code ("Plastic Bag Reduction") restricts the use of single -use plastic checkout bags. The restrictions do not apply to plastic bags used to carry out cooked food or provided solely for produce, bulk food or meat. The Chamber will encourage its vendors to comply with the purposes of the ordinance by utilizing paper bags or encouraging the use of reusable totes whenever practicable. 2.11 Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 70.93.093 concerning event recycling, the Chamber will place clearly marked recycling containers throughout the Event area for the collection of aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles and other recyclable materials from Event participants. The Chamber will be responsible for providing recycling, compost, and garbage collection and removal services (see also Section 2.12, below). 2.12 Pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 6.90 ("Noncompostable Food Service Containers Prohibition") and 6.95 ECC ("Single -Use Plastic Utensils — Prohibition"), which prohibit the use of non-compostable food service containers and single -use plastic utensils (such as plastic straws, stirrers and cutlery) at public events requiring a contract with the City, the Chamber will ensure that food vendors at this public event provide only compostable food service containers and utensils, as defined in Chapters 6.90 and 6.95 ECC, to Event participants. Aluminum and steel cans, plastic bottles and certain plastic cups that are accepted as recyclable continue to be acceptable for vendor use. The Chamber will provide for the on -site collection of compostable and recyclable materials from Event participants, using designated color -coded collection containers. The Chamber will ensure that on -site collection containers are serviced properly and continually during the Event. A Chamber representative will meet with the City's Recycling Coordinator or representative prior to August 15, 2022, in order to be educated on the 3-container system to maximize diversion of compostable and recyclable materials from the garbage, and the City will work to identify mutually agreed upon locations for food waste stations. These stations will be identified on Event maps and website. 2.13Indemnification: The Chamber will defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, s Packet Pg. 243 7.12.b injuries, damages, losses or suits, including attorney fees, arising from or in connection with the Chamber's performance, or nonperformance, of this Agreement, except to the extent that claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits are caused by the sole negligence of the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless will include a waiver by the Chamber of the immunity provided under Title 51 RCW, but only to the extent necessary to fully effectuate this promise. This provision will survive the termination and/or expiration of this Agreement. 2.14 The Parties acknowledge that pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 70.160 RCW (hereinafter the "smoking ban"), smoking is prohibited in indoor areas, within 25 feet of vents or entrances and in outdoor areas where public employees of the City, and employees of any vendor at the Event or of the contracting organization are required to be. This general description of the provisions of the initiative is included for the purpose of reference and is not intended to expand or contract the obligations created by the smoking ban. The Chamber warrants that it will comply with the smoking ban and will utilize the services and advice of the Snohomish County Health District in assuring compliance during the Event described in this Agreement. 2.15 Chamber will provide any and all security services necessary to reasonably secure the area and facilities provided, including the City -Provided Site. City will have no ~ responsibility or liability for the provision of security services nor will it be liable for any loss or damage incurred by Chamber or the participants in this Event. c 2.16 Chamber will provide sufficient wash stations and approximately 10 sani-cans that may be placed on site the night preceding the Event. Garbage service will be contracted and paid for by Chamber. Chamber will place 25 garbage and recycle d containers around downtown for garbage collection. 2 2.17 Upon completion of the Event, Chamber will make adequate provisions for the cleanup of all sites provided under the terms of this Agreement so as to restore them to the same state of cleanliness as existed the night prior to the Event. Cleanup of all relevant street pavements will be completed by 7:00 p.m. on that day. Cleanup of sidewalks will be completed by 11:00 p.m. on that day. Cleanup areas include the City -Provided Site as described in Section 1 and all streets immediately surrounding the Event perimeter. A final inspection of the Event area will be conducted by a designated City official to determine if all areas are clean and returned to their original condition. For purposes of marking sidewalk or asphalt, Chamber agrees to use a temporary, water soluble, environmentally friendly material, further Chamber will make best efforts to minimize the markings used on sidewalks and streets. 2.18 Chamber will pay City all permit fees for the above -mentioned facility use and services at least ten (10) days prior to the Event, and will reimburse City for the actual costs of supplies or services furnished by City (excluding those agreed to in Section 1) within thirty (30) days of mailing of a final bill by the City, provided such supplies and services are approved and listed by all Parties to this Agreement in a Packet Pg. 244 7.12.b signed addendum to this Agreement prior to the date which they purport to be required. 2.19 Colored banners or flags may not be placed in the existing holes in the public sidewalk designated for the American flag program. 2.20 Chamber will provide "no parking" signs to the City no later than September 4, 2022. 2.21 Chamber will coordinate with and hire one Edmonds Police Officer for the duration of the event. 3. Miscellaneous. 3.1 Entire agreement, integration and amendment. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties relating to the rights and obligations created hereby, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, understandings, and agreements, written or oral, between the Parties. Any prior discussions or understandings are deemed merged with the provisions herein. This Agreement will not be amended, assigned or otherwise changed or transferred except in writing with the express written consent of the Parties hereto. Any action to interpret or enforce this Agreement will be brought before the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington, and the Parties agree that, as between them, all matters will be resolved in that venue. 3.2 Force majeure. The Parties will not be liable for failure to perform or delay in performance due to fire, flood, strike or other labor difficulty, act of God, act of any governmental authority, riot, embargo, fuel or energy shortage, car shortage, wrecks or delays in transportation, or due to any other cause beyond the Parties' reasonable control. In the event of delay in performance due to any such cause, the date of delivery or time for completion will be extended by a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of such delay. 3.2 Relationship between the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted to or in fact create an agency or employment relationship between the Parties. No officer, official, agent, employee or representative of the Chamber will be deemed to be the same of the City for any purpose. The Chamber alone will be solely responsible for all acts of its officers, officials, agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 3.3 Compliance with Laws. The Chamber in the performance of this Agreement will comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and ordinances, including all applicable public health and safety guidelines and all requirements of the federal government, the State of Washington, and the City related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The most recent information regarding the applicable state and federal guidelines and requirements relating to the COVID-19 pandemic can be found on the Washington State coronavirus response webpage at www.coronavirus.wa.gov and on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov. The Governor's Spectator Events COVID-19 7 Packet Pg. 245 7.12.b Requirements, which contains hyperlinks to related resources and any updates to its requirements, may be found at: https://www. govemor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/COVID 19%2OSpectator%20Event%20G uidance.pdf. The Chamber will consult this information regularly during the course of the event to ensure that the latest guidelines and requirements are promptly implemented. 3.4 Non -Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 3.5 Termination. Each and every term and condition herein set forth and contained in this Agreement are expressly made terms, covenants, agreements and conditions, and a breach of any one of them by the Chamber will constitute a breach of this Agreement. In the event the Chamber fails to comply with any of the terms, covenants, agreements or conditions of this Agreement, or in the event the Chamber violates any local, city, county, state, or federal law, in connection with the Event, upon giving the Chamber twenty-four (24) hours' advance written notice, the City may terminate this Agreement. Provided, the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director may order the Chamber to cease operation of the Event hereunder immediately at any time should the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director determine that the Event is detrimental to public safety, health, or welfare. Such a determination may be made in relation to COVID-19 or to any other public safety, health or welfare issue. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all the rights, licenses, and privileges herein contained will be terminated, the Chamber will have no further rights hereunder, and the City may require the immediate removal of all property of the Chamber and its vendors from the City -Provided Site. DATED this day of , 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS: Mike Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Greg Urban, President and CEO APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney 44 0 Packet Pg. 246 7.12.b Exhibit A City Provided -Site Sunday, September 11 xxx Street Closure xx Alleyway Closure 0 Restrooms Vehicle Display Registration Area Packet Pg. 247 7.12.b Exhibit B South County Fire' Food Vendor & Festival Requirements Fire Lane - A 20 ft Fire Lane must be maintained for emergency vehicle access. - Unobstructed access to Fire hydrants shall be maintained at all times. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining immediate access for rendering aid or to fire protection equipment or fire hydrants (IFC 507.5.4) Tents and Other Membrane Structures - All tents, canopies, and other membrane structures erected shall meet the requirements of the current edition of NFPA 701 and the IFC Section 3103 and 3104 and shall be labeled fire resistive. - Tents need to be less than 400 sq ft or additional permit maybe required. - Inflatable play equipment and all membrane structures shall be properly installed per the manufacturer instructions Fire Extinquishers - 5-lbs. Portable ABC type extinguisher is required in all booths with current annual inspection/service tag attached - Booths with deep fat fryers also require a Class "K" rated fire extinguisher with current annual inspection/service tag attached. - Hood suppression systems MUST have current inspection documentation. - Keep fire extinguishers accessible and conspicuous. Cooking H - No candles or open flame devices like tiki torches. >+ - No flaming food. - Barbecue pits need a 10' separation from combustibles and portable FE. c - Open flame from cooking devices shall be enclosed in such a manner as to prevent the flame from contacting any combustible material and shall be placed on a non-combustible surface. v - All combustibles shall be kept away from heat sources. - No cooking appliances/heat sources will be within physical reach of the general public. P Electrical Cords - Minimum size 12-2 with ground UL approved outdoor rated from power feed source, 14-2 with ground UL approved is allowed elsewhere. - All cords shall be free of splices, cuts or breaks in outer sheathing. - UL or other approved Strip Plugs with integral circuit breaker are the only allowed power tap/adapter. Booth Construction - Cooking booth construction shall be labeled fire resistive. - Non -rated blue, green or brown plastic tarps are not allowed over cooking areas. Rubbish - Keep combustible rubbish in closed containers. - Cardboard boxes are rubbish/not rubbish containers. - Rubbish containers larger than 40 gallons must be labeled fire -resistive. Fuel Use/Storage - All tanks/cylinders (whether in use or storage) must be secured to avoid falling and damaging the valve assembly. - No smoking in or around cooking/fuel use or storage areas. - Store tanks/cylinders upright so pressure relief valve is in vapor space. - Fuel tank/cylinder storage/Use is limited to one day's supply, quantity at the discretion of Fire Marshal. Fire District 1 (South County Fire), 12425 Meridian Avenue S, Everett, WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 / www.firedistrictl.org 10 Packet Pg. 248 7.12.c EVENT AGREEMENT THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as "Chamber") (collectively, the "Parties"). WHEREAS, the Chamber has for many years sponsored a public celebration honoring Independence Day - 4th of July through a parade and 5K race; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such an event enhances tourism and promotes economic development as well as providing an opportunity for good clean fun to its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to participate in the sponsorship of such events by providing the consideration set forth in this Agreement in order to enhance the safety of the public celebrations for its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, covenants, conditions and performances set forth below, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Responsibilities of the Citv 1.1 The City will provide the following spaces to be used by the Chamber: c Use of City streets as diagrammed in Exhibit A - Parade Site Plan, for parade to occur on July 4, 2022. City will provide traffic barriers as identified in Exhibit A. E The Edmonds Police and Public Works Departments will determine whether any changes to the Parade Site Plan map will be needed and will communicate any such a, changes to the Chamber no later than June 30, 2022. a Use of Hazel Miller Plaza for small stage, amplified sound and parade announcements throughout parade on July 4, 2022. Use of City Park Parking lot, parking spaces on 3rd Avenue and sidewalks as diagrammed in Exhibit B — Race Route, and Exhibit C — No Parking Map, for the 5 K race. The Edmonds Police and Public Works Departments will determine whether any changes to the Race Route or No Parking maps will be needed and will communicate any such changes to the Chamber no later than June 30, 2022. The City will provide a flatbed truck provided by facilities to be used as an elevated platform for parade announcements and amplified sound. Vehicle to be delivered and parked by City Staff; Chamber staff will not operate the vehicle. 1.2 The City will install 4th of July Celebration street banners at all approved sites. Packet Pg. 249 7.12.c 1.3 The City will waive fees for the Street Banner (s) and Parade Permit Fee. 1.4 The City will authorize a maximum of three (3) stationary self-contained vendors on closed sections of 5th or Main Streets off the parade route. No vendors will be authorized along the parade route. Vendors will operate at specified locations and will not block entrances or fire hydrants. Vendors must be self-contained; no power hookups are available for vendors. Vendors are responsible for having appropriate permits and for compliance with all local and state requirements. 2. Responsibilities of the Chamber. 2.1 The Chamber will assume all responsibility for coordination of the 4th of July Parade, including but not limited to hiring off -duty police officers to police the route and assuring that all participants are informed of and abide by the parade rules to ensure that no participants draw people viewing the parade onto the parade route. 2.2 The Chamber will assume all responsibility for coordination of the 5K race, including but not limited to ensuring that the flow of traffic is not disrupted on City Streets and that volunteers are stationed at crosswalks to ensure runner safety. 2.3 The Chamber shall notify Community Transit of activities that may impact N transportation services in Edmonds. IM 21 2.4 The Chamber will utilize the barricades and detour signs provided by the City and position them at their assigned locations at 6:00 a.m., July 4, 2022. ° 2.5 The Chamber will not illegally discriminate in the provision of either event or in their entrance requirements against any person or organization in violation of state or federal statute or local ordinance. 2.6 The Chamber agrees that the 4th of July celebration is a public event. The Chamber further agrees that areas constituting the City -Provided sites that are covered under this Agreement, including but not limited to public right of way, streets, sidewalks, parks, parking lots, gardens, meeting halls and squares, are traditional public forums. As a result, the Chamber will permit citizens attending events open to the general public at the City -Provided sites during the 4th of July celebration to exercise therein their protected constitutional right to free speech without interference on City Property. 2.7 Permits: The Chamber will be responsible for obtaining all required city and state permits. The Chamber will submit all required application(s) for the Street Banner Permit and Parade Permit provided for by tis Agreement. 2.8 The Chamber will obtain ASCAP and any other copyright licenses necessary. Packet Pg. 250 7.12.c 2.9 The Chamber will provide sufficient portable sani-cans and wash stations along both the parade and race routes. 2.10 The Chamber will provide for security along the parade and race routes. 2.11 The Chamber will provide signs one (1) week prior to the event to indicate that chairs cannot be placed early. Signs must be laminated, no exceptions. 2.12 The Chamber will provide 60 no parking signs one (1) week prior to the event. 2.13 The Chamber agrees to consult with the City Electrician and Parks Maintenance Manager before installing any electrical service or stakes in the ground. The City Electrician will have final say in all electrical matters. No ground penetrations are allowed unless authorized first by the City electrician and City Parks Department. Any unauthorized ground penetrations may be subject to fine and/or damage cost recovery from the Chamber. It is not allowed to fasten anything to the buildings, structures or trees; doing so may result in damage cost recovery and /or fine. City staff will coordinate any utility locates. 2.14 To comply with Chapter 6.80 of the Edmonds City Code (ECC) ("Plastic Bag Reduction"), which restricts the use of single -use plastic checkout bags. The restrictions do not apply to plastic bags used to carry out cooked food or provided solely for produce, bulk food or meat. The Chamber will encourage its vendors to comply with the purposes of the ordinance by utilizing paper bags or encouraging the use of reusable totes whenever practicable. 2.15 To comply with RCW 70.93.093, concerning event recycling. The Chamber will place clearly marked recycling containers throughout the Event area for the collection of aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles and other recyclable materials from event participants. The Chamber will be responsible for providing recycling, compost, and garbage collection and removal services (see also Section 2.14, below). 2.16 To comply with Chapters 6.90 ("Noncompostable Food Service Containers Prohibition") and 6.95 ECC ("Single -Use Plastic Utensils — Prohibition"), which prohibit the use of non-compostable food service containers and single -use plastic utensils (such as plastic straws, stirrers and cutlery) at public events requiring a contract with the City. The Chamber will ensure that food vendors at this public event provide only compostable food service containers and utensils, as defined in Chapters 6.90 and 6.95 ECC, to event participants. Aluminum and steel cans, plastic bottles and certain plastic cups that are accepted as recyclable continue to be acceptable for vendor use. The Chamber will provide for the on -site collection of compostable and recyclable materials from event participants, using designated color -coded collection containers. The Chamber will ensure that on -site collection containers are serviced properly and continually during each event. A Chamber representative will meet with the City's Recycling Coordinator or representative prior to June 6, 2022, in order to be educated on the 3-container system to maximize diversion of compostable and recyclable materials from the garbage. 3 Packet Pg. 251 7.12.c 2.17 To comply with Chapter 70.160 RCW (hereinafter the "smoking ban") pursuant to which smoking is prohibited in indoor areas, within 25 feet of vents or entrances and in outdoor areas where public employees of the City, and employees of any vendor at the event or of the contracting organization are required to be. This general description of the provisions of the statute is included for the purpose of reference and is not intended to expand or contract the obligations created by the smoking ban. The Chamber warrants that it will comply with the smoking ban and will utilize the services and advice of the Snohomish County Health District in assuring compliance during the event described in this Agreement. 2.18 Clean -Up: The Chamber will be responsible for clean-up of the parade and race routes to include staging areas as follows: 2.18.1 To restore all public spaces to their original condition, including removing and disposing of any and all litter and trash to the size of a cigarette butt, including metal and litter debris, equipment, and any and all other items made necessary by or used in the provision of this event. 2.18.2 Pick up all trash and remove all items and equipment related to the 4th of July Parade and 5K race by 5 p.m. on July 4, 2022. 2.18.3 To return all event barricades, if applicable, to original locations at the end of the parade, exact locations to be determined by the Streets Department. 2.19 Insurance: The chamber will provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the ° following insurance: General Liability insurance will be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 covering premises, operations, products - completed operations and contractual liability. The City of Edmonds will be named as an additional insured on the Chamber's General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured -Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or an endorsement providing at least as broad coverage. The General Liability insurance will be written with limits no less than $2,000,000 each occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate. The insurance policy will contain, or be endorsed to contain, that the Chamber's insurance coverage will be primary insurance as respect the City of Edmonds. Any insurance, self-insurance, or self -insured pool coverage maintained by the City of Edmonds will be excess of the Chamber's insurance and will not contribute with it. The Chamber will provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the required insurance before using the premises described herein. Insurance will be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. Packet Pg. 252 7.12.c 2.18 Indemnification: The Chamber will defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including attorney fees, arising from or in connection with the Chamber's performance, or nonperformance, of this Agreement, except to the extent that claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits are caused by the sole negligence of the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless will include a waiver by the Chamber of the immunity provided under Title 51 RCW, but only to the extent necessary to fully effectuate this promise. This provision will survive the termination and/or expiration of this Agreement. 3. Miscellaneous. 3.1 Entire agreement, integration and amendment. This Agreement contains the entire 0 agreement and understanding between the Parties relating to the rights and cn obligations created hereby, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous v negotiations, understandings, and agreements, written or oral, between the Parties. Os Any prior discussions or understandings are deemed merged with the provisions herein. This Agreement will not be amended, assigned or otherwise changed or 0 transferred except in writing with the express written consent of the Parties hereto. Any action to interpret or enforce this Agreement will be brought before the aU Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington, and the Parties agree that, as between them, all matters will be resolved in that venue. ~ 3.2 Force majeure. The Parties will not be liable for failure to perform or delay in c performance due to pandemic -related restrictions, fire, flood, strike or other labor difficulty, act of nature, act of any governmental authority, riot, embargo, fuel or energy shortage, car shortage, wrecks or delays in transportation, or due to any other cause beyond the Parties' reasonable control. In the event of delay in E performance due to any such cause, the date of delivery or time for completion L will be extended by a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect a of such delay. E 3.3 Relationship between the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted to or in fact create an agency or employment relationship between the Parties. No officer, official, agent, employee or representative of the Chamber will be deemed to be the same of the City for any purpose. The Chamber alone will be solely responsible for all acts of its officers, officials, agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 3.4 Compliance with Laws. The Chamber in the performance of this Agreement will comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and ordinances, including all applicable public health and safety guidelines and all requirements of the federal government, the State of Washington, and the City related to the COVID- 19 pandemic. The most recent information regarding the applicable state and Packet Pg. 253 7.12.c federal guidelines and requirements relating to the COVID-19 pandemic can be found on the Washington State coronavirus response webpage at www.coronavirus.wa.gov and on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov. The Governor's Spectator Events COVID-19 Requirements, which contains hyperlinks to related resources and any updates to its requirements, may be found at: https://www.govemor.wa. jzov/sites/default/files/COVID 19%2OSpectator%2OEve nt%20Guidance.pdf. The Chamber will consult this information regularly during the course of the event to ensure that the latest guidelines and requirements are promptly implemented. DATED this day of , 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS: GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER Mike Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney OF COMMERCE: Greg Urban, President and CEO N- 0 z Packet Pg. 254 7.12.c Exhibit A Parade Site Plan XXY Main Parade 'r �-Reg istration° Staging Area - Route Children"Parade AN EDM�.r" NDS Registration KIND OF 4TH StagingArea 1- Route } � 1 r1 Q Puh[icRestrooms 2}} xv Street Closures 4,O h�Q NOSST }'AFC` sr edmonds CHAMBER OFCOFAMERCE a r h �w END i Q � a ST `ham DEIST a o-4 Chamber office GLEN ST _ Edmonds Centerfor ,hp Arts 'r DALFY ST fND SPRACLIE 5T = S1 x I Ci�Fi.ld' �GS�C li START MAIN ST s a a m p DAYT4N ST MAPLE ST — —MAVLEST=' I� ALDER-ST --AIDE1tSr _ IL a START — X)C7L tNT 0 Edmonds K HOLLY DR — ACE .HOWEttWAY XXX IOLMtN• Q 7 Packet Pg. 255 � Vadnu hPark Point m £Ihlbk a Race Route '411# marsIl r.J.;reeK . .� / Z � 45" Ede u i ids, WA 9 8 020 Avenue So Uth e �e PoImEdwaW\ Eons m@dmse m_ Sc : 3 � MA2511u e 2 � SYLILo ) I 2 e~y Bells GC9.0 `�---, ■ e-- m �lhramm . e I; mi 1 * $�@ �e e e� 2 - 27g8 0 O Wog w■ y Dogwood �� a � @ ■■aeeee� o ® e e ® $� ® e ® e ( [ I' 22 WOW■WA gee®®Sherwood Eememyh .« - D r k Park } _ . \ B Packet Pg. 256 7.12.c Chamber HQ (infield) Proposed "No Parking" Gam - 1 pm Exhibit C No Parking Map for Race Start/Finish Hamburger Harrys II91 � m m �.. m m Barkada Edmonds 19 _ EdmOrlds m a ly Parr Startline (parking lane) Finish line (parking lane) Vdunteer & CAUTION sign (park entrance) 1 ❑Corrals for vuaiting runners s 'Parking lotin City Park remains open to public a ri Wv,rLtomll PS hell CP w CL M ro 0 0 tPlillowIr O< O The Continental u 0 Ud Q 9 Packet Pg. 257 7.13 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Dedication of Bracket's Reserve Plat "Road A" as a public street named 91st PI W Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 10, 2022, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was placed on the May 17, 2022 consent agenda for City Council approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the Bracket's Reserve street dedication. Narrative The City is currently reviewing a proposed 11-lot subdivision at 9105 240t" St SW. In accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.75.085 (Subdivision - Review Criteria), the city council may require dedication of land in the proposed subdivision for public use. In accordance with ECDC 18.50.020 (Official Street Map - Dedication presumption and requirement), applicants for a subdivision shall be presumed to create development impacts upon the street and transportation system of the city and such presumed impacts shall be mitigated by the dedication of such right-of-way to the city and to public use. As a condition of development, the applicant shall dedicate the access road shown in Attachment 2 as "Road A", to the city for public use. The 40-ft dedication includes sidewalk area for public pedestrian access. In addition, a 45' radius will be dedicated as a cul-de-sac for vehicle turnaround. Consistent with ECDC 19.75, the street shall be named "915t PI W" in accordance with the Snohomish County grid system and the Official Street Map. Subsequent to City Council approval of the Bracket's Reserve subdivision, the street dedication will be recorded against the subject property with the final plat documents for the subdivision. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Site Plan Packet Pg. 258 I 7.13.a I "City of Edmonds Brackets Reserve Conservation Plat 0 505.19 1,010.4 Feet 752.3 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet ma 9r028 p' g p Aping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 0 U 0 tv Legend Q ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN — <all other values> 0 1 }, fC 2 d 5; 4 U 9;71;7;8 d N d State Highways ,all other values, N - - 0 tv Y U 1 fC i 2 m O R O L tZ Q Q IZ C� G ..2 (v I_ U f4 r r a Notes E t U 9105-9125 240th Ave. SW co File PLN2021-0037 VICINITY MAP Packet Pg. 259 1 1 7.13.b I a 0 0 N LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 12, HANBURY'S SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED WEST BOULEVARD LYING ADJACENT TO SAID SOUTH 100 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 12 AS CONVEYED BY THAT DEED UNDER AUD/TORS FILE NO. 9008170139 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. SITUATE /N THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL B: LOTS 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 13, HANBURY'S SOUND VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 20 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED WEST BOULEVARD LYING ADJACENT TO SAID NORTH 100 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 13 AS CONVEYED BY THAT DEED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO. 9008170139 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED WEST BOULEVARD AS WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING ADJACENT TO THE NORTH 100 FEET OF SAID LOT 5, BLOCK 13. EXCEPT THEREFROM THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT J. SITUATE /N THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON BASIS OF BEARINGS HELD A BEARING OF NORTH 8945'00" EAST ALONG THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF 240TH ST SW PER PLAT OF EDMUNDS HIGHLANDS. HORIZONTAL DATUM NAD '83/'07 PER SNOHOMISH COUNTY MONUMENT DESIGNATION 1379 AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M VERTICAL DATUM NAVD '88 AS VERIFIED TO SNOHOMISH COUNTY CONTROL POINT 25. _Q�BENCH MARK OR/G/NA TING BENCHMARK SNOHOMISH COUNTY CONTROL POINT 25 FOUND INVERTED NAIL IN CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 1.0' IN CASE AT THE CENTERLINE OF 236TH ST SW AT THE INTERSECTION WITH 92ND AVE W. ELEVA TION: 442.74' IBM A' AT FOUND 'X' IN 1-1/2" BRASS DISK STAMPED "WSI 16916" IN 4'X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.4' IN CASE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF 240TH ST SW & 92ND AVE W. ELEVA TION. 429. 50' IBM B' AT FOUND X' IN 1 3/4" BRASS DISK /N 4'X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.3' IN CASE LOCATED AT THE CENTERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 240TH ST SW, SOUTH OF HOUSE NO. 9019. ELEVA TION: 455.40' SCHEDULE B SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS EASEMENTS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE ALTA COMMITMENT BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 500111460, DATED OCTOBER 5, 2020, AT 8: 00 A.M. 1 SUBJECT TO EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO, AS GRANTED /N A DOCUMENT REGARDING INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES PER RECORDING NUMBER 2113089. 2 SUBJECT TO EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO, AS GRANTED /N A DOCUMENT REGARDING ROAD AND UTILITIES PER RECORDING NUMBER 9009120248. 3 DOCUMENT NOT PROVIDED WITH ALTA COMMITMENT. 4 SUBJECT TO EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO, AS GRANTED IN A DOCUMENT REGARDING INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES PER RECORDING NUMBER 9006210519. AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT UNDER AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 9009120248 RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH. 5 SUBJECT TO EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSES) AND RIGHTS INC/DENTAL THERETO, AS GRANTED IN A DOCUMENT REGARDING INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES PER RECORDING NUMBER 9006210520. 6 SUBJECT TO ANY IRREGULARITIES, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS IN THE PROCEEDINGS OCCASIONING THE ABANDONMENT OR VACATION OF WEST BOULEVARD. 7 SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS NOT DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS TO MATTERS AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY, WHETHER OR NOT SAID EASEMENTS ARE VISIBLE AND APPARENT. 8 SUBJECT TO LIABILITY FOR SEWER TREATMENT CAPACITY CHARGES, IF ANY. SURVEYOR NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY CONCLUDED ON 111912020 AND CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS INDICATING THE GENERAL CONDITIONS EXISTING AT THAT TIME. 2. THIS SURVEY DISCLOSES FACTORS OF RECORD AND ON THE GROUND AFFECTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY, BUT IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO LEGALLY RESOLVE RELATED PROPERTY LINE DISPUTES WHERE AMBIGUITIES ARE NOTED, AXIS RECOMMENDS THAT THE OWNER CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL TO DETERMINE HOW BEST TO INTERPRET THEIR PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ADDRESS ANY POTENT/AL PROPERTY LINE DISPUTES. SE1/4, SEC 31, TWP 27N, RGE 4E, W,M, BRACKET'S RESERVE PRELIMINARY PLAT N i I SCALE. • 1 " = JO' I I 0 15 30 60 BLOCK 112 HANBURY'S SOUND VIEW TRACTS V, 7 / PG,20 LOT 5"- \ I LOT 4 J �4rDyg ,� ` `-_____---,,,,45 54! -- -�- Rom\ N 8945'00" E �201.IiPg -,'4452 - --------444--� _-- R Z \ NN N�,_ FOUND 1/2" REBAR r \ - 0.1'E. OF LOT CORNER. / `� `� \ \ I (1110712020) � - 201.62' \ -44 \ O 1.2'W. OF LOT LINE \ \\ \\ 11 �\ \� \�� FENCE CROSSES / 11 LOT LINE 55.8'N. / \�•�N'`� \\ I N, \\ `\ \ I OF LOT CORNER. N�\ \\ \\\ \\ \ ..Of 1 VILLAGER TRACT 999 \I \` 1 �` \` 5'cLFNc REC, NO. 81112285001 OPEN SPACE \ i i I `� \1 5' 1 l 1 j � hcb ' ��' ` 30,164 SF \\ �\ `\ I\ \ \\ R%4 FENCE CROSSES Id I \ \ \ \ \ LOT LINE 9.8N. OF 5 LOT CORNER. J J d co \ ` \ ` FENCE INTERSECTION I i I 1 I � a IN9TALd Ndl PArKl G ) IRE�-LAN�,\ \\ \ ' '� IS 0.4E OF LOT LINE. s/+S 6\ 50' 10. a AROUNp C�-S , 1 \\ \\\ NNI � \\�\ `� \ ✓ i 6'CLFNC E. flND FENCE J 1 I I \ �\ II �?-- cr.�448 1 4 4 IS O LOT LINE. N �� �- �4.50 N 89'45'00" E _ 8J.71' 5 - — IillI I j I I j I \\�\I \\N 89.45?OW E >Z361'�`� \�`� \�•�� } _8 — - — FOUND 1/2" REBAR SW FENCE CORNER \/tS ' AND SMASHED CAP �i I 1 I I I r`N _�s. 1 0.1 'N. OF LOT CORNER 0.5N.x0.5E. OF L07` \` \\ \�`� <� _SST - ��`• CORNA I I (11 06 2020 u, \ \ \ \� �\ ``. — I _6 i I o TRACT 998 5,043 SF i i I L 4,537 SF --- I i i I I I I \\ \\ \ J N � \ FOUND 1/2" REBAR `- ` I PROPOSED.EIRE HYDRANT \ __0 1 I I _ - I I `\ I AND CAP "LSA 22959" ap 1 I \ \\ \ \I \ \ I ` L----- �— J `\ \ \\ `\ I`\ L`� — — N`� — — J N N 8.945OO�E`\100. �I 0.1 N.x0.1'E. OF LOT N 8945'00" E 100.00 I CORNER `�\ \ \� \ I F- - - - - j- - - � - L � (11/06/2020) l FENCE INTERSECTION `1� IS 0.5E. OF LOT LINE. oo 8 I o \ 5 \ I o 4,600 SF I I \ 5, 000 SF -�\ _ \\o \\ \ \v\ \\� \\\ \ \� �I I o \\ I I \`� \; I 4 IN,— — — — — J I L _ — - 1 -� \ N 89 45'00" E 100.00' `O \ N 89 5'00" E 100.00� ' EDMONDS I Q o REBAR 10 \— /2 \ BSBL (TYP) AND CAP LSA 22969"Au FOUND 1 SCHOOL N 15 \ AT LOT CORNER.D/STR/CT 15 11/o62jo2oo o iI 9 o 4I L L5, 000 SF _ — — — I i 5,000 SF \� I Ln p I I I I I 1 \ I 1 _� I I -- —__j L—\�__1 _ I _�J EDMUNDS HIGHLANDS _, wo. oo I N_ 89 45 0 I E 100. oQ 3 REC. NO. 2004041125344 I 1J. \\II \ `: I I IIII IJ,\\ �\ \\ \ \ `..k` - I `• \ \ I ' v� li I i i iI I Ii b I. I i \I II I o \ 3` \ 1 1 1 I III II N o I I I I I 10 0 co I I I co FOUND 1/2" REBAR u� I I 1 I I I I o d I I 4 �00 SF \ 2 1 I 1 I 1 5,000 SF �n I I \ \ I AND CAP "LSA 22969" AT LOT CORNER. 1 iii Ili o li i I i I i I �-— �-- 1 J) — - u— 10----J —'—N 894500"k 1 .00 T ----_"k45 0 E 0.00 `\ I 'I \ \� FENCE INTERSECTION III\��-----� I `\ IS 0.6'E. OF LOT LINE. IO' JOINT UTILITY \\ EASEMENT TYP \ I\ 2 J J l o I 61 / FOUND 1 \o 2» REBAR I illjll 2 \ I I Ili I �1I1I _ ' _p 44 I 4,800 SF `\ I AND CAP "LSA 22969" to - I / I \ \\ I 011 020 CORNER. (062) // J/ 1 N 8945 0 0E 1�19.00 1 — -- - J-- \ FENCE INTERSECTION 1 1 \I i I i IV 89 45'QLL _�Ot?OCL 20' 20 \ L - - - T_ - - �,- I IS 0.6E. OF LOT LINE. 1 Im as \\ _--- .�\\\ �\\ \ 12' 12 0 ` i i i _ I I 6'BFNC ' w I \\ I _ \` \ I I I I I �\ N �1SW FENCE - :`\ M. I I I 1 I I I - I I CORNER IS I. I 'E. rn\ \ 11 1 1 � TRACT 998 ��51115F� OF LOT LINE. OPEN SPACE / DETENTION - �`� ``� `� i I I FOUND 1 2" REBAR n I IIII I\� _7 FOUND _ _----- ' 4,973 SF / �" _ = I �j ` ��_� `�c�� i 141 AND CAP "LSA 22969" ,\— \ j T � \ — — —\\\�\ `� `—�` sr O (1110612020) \ --_�9'45'80;'��_ 2�3.55' _ \ \ ` \\ \, ► __1 — _ _ _ � _ — - " � --- �1 o ------------------ \ L--------------------------- -------------------- .------ ----- ------ -----------------I--� 1 r I � � FOUND REBAR AND CAP � � — 294.04' I — �—I\ \— I 194.63' �127 1 "WEl 16916" '. — (12116120) \\ I I \ \R C30 240TH ST SW \ A� 2 RR �`� ELEV.=455.40 1— - — -- ------------------- FOUND XI '' N 1 1 2" BRASS DISK TBM 'A' / Q I ELEV.=429.50' FOUND 'X' IN 1 3/4" BRASS STAMPED "WSI 16916" IN 4'X4" Z CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.4' DISK IN 4'X4" CONCRETE CASE 0.08'W. OF SECTION LINE N FOUND 'X' IN 1 3/4" MONUMENT DOWN 0.3' IN CASE. IN IN CAE 020) BRASS DISK IN 4'X4" (1110612020) CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.3' IN CASE. (1110612020) 141.02' 4 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT TEAM OWNER LANDSCAPE UNIQUE HEIRLOOM ART REVOCABLE TRUST CRAMER DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 9029 240TH ST SW 1909 242ND ST SE EDMONDS, WA 98026 BOTHELL, WA 98012 (00463301300400) (425) 241-6258 APPLICANT CONTACT- GAYLE CRAMER CDCLSA@FRONTIER.COM PACIFIC RIDGE - DRH, LLC 17921 BOTHELL-EVERETT HWY, SUITE 100 GEOTECHN/CAL BOTHELL, WA 98012 (425) 438-8444 EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC CONTACT SCOTT BORGESON 1805 136TH PL NE, SUITE 201 SRBORGESON@PACIFICRIDGEHOMESCOM BELLEVUE, WA 98005 (425) 284-3300 CIVIL ENGINEER CONTACT • HENRY WRIGHT, PE HENRY. WRIGHT@EARTHSOLUTIONSNW. COM RAM ENGINEERING, INC. 16531 13TH AVE W, SUITE A 108 ARBOR/ST L YNNWOOD, WA 98037 (425) 678-6960 SHOFFNER CONSULTING CONTACT ROB L. LONG, PE 14515 NORTH CREEK DRIVE A209 ROBLQRAMENGINEER/NGINC.COM MILL CREEK, WA 98012 SURVEYOR (206) 755-9407 CONTACT TONY SHOFFNER AXIS SURVEY & MAPPING TON YO TON YSHOFFNER. COM 15241 NE 90TH ST REDMOND, WA 98052 (425) 823-5700 CONTACT. TRAVIS BRADLEY,, PLS IRA V/S©AXISMAP. COM SITE DATA RAM ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering / Land Planning 16531 13TH AVE W, SUITE A108 LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 PHONE: (425) 678-6960 WWW.RAMENGINEERINGINC.COM Ma SITE ADDRESS: 9125 240TH ST SW, EDMONDS, WA 98026 9109 240TH ST SW, EDMONDS, WA 98026 9105 240TH ST SW, EDMONDS, WA 98026 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 00463301300400, 00463301300301, 00463301300303, 0046330120040J GROSS SITE AREA: 107,474 SF (2.47 AC) EXISTING ZONING RS-8 PROPOSED ZONING: RS-8 w PROPOSED LOTS: 11 J PROPOSED USE. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENT/AL AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 4,914 SF MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE. • 359? (TOTAL AREA) Q 1 CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION DESIGN AVERAGE LOT SIZE (89,190 SF / 11): 8,108 SF (LOT AREA + TRACTS 998 & 999) SMALLEST NET LOT SIZE (LOT 7): 4,537 SF Q *SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. STREET SETBACK MIN/MUM = 15 FEET UA cc REAR SETBACK MINIMUM = 10 FEET SIDE SETBACK MINIMUM = 5 FEET * PER EDC 20.75.048(B)(1) Q **MAX/MUM LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED = 31,217 SF Z%6- (J57. OF 89,190 SF) ftsm **PER EDC 20.75.048(8)(3) tj AGENCIES/UTILITIES JURISDICTION CITY OF EDMONDS STORM DISTRICT CITY OF EDMONDS WATER DISTRICT OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT SEWER DISTRICT OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 FIRE DISTRICT SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 TELEPHONE ZIPLEY ELECTRICAL SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD NO. 1 GAS PSE GARBAGE REPUBLIC SERVICE SHEET INDEX CITY OF EDMONDS 1 PP-01 PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT 2 EC-01 EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP Know whars below, Call before you dig. 1 STREET l ljOO�� S REDMOND, WA TEL. 425.823-5700 98052 p� Survey & Mapping FAX 425.823-6700 THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A WASHINGTON STA TE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR AXIS PROJECT 20 229 L. OY WASV, d 365 8 �CL! is 1Eg'9 \SSIO>\re t .�� ROB L. LONG, PE DRAWN BY.• MIKE MORRIS ISSUE DA TE.• SCALE.• 619121 AS NOTED JOB NO: 20-024 SHEET: PP-0 1 Q SHT o% OF-2 I Packet Pg. 260 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT 15 SE1/4, SEC 31, TWP 27N, RGE 4E, W.M. I I I BLOCK 12 HANBURYS ND VIEW TRACTSI I V, 7 / PG.20 LOT 5-- NI LOT 4 460 1-1 17189 I A,y6 "17173 IN. 32 F// // ` J'718�♦ r r 17166 4�s8"� `A ��� \����e� tFy2 9 ,mac ---4-- 1 1 89 45 E .� I 171175 - �1.1 1712 / `� n`� -��.�.��� \ JaZ16 ram` r'. 14 c FOUND 1/2" REBAR I / 1771 16 \\ i / \ \\ __=_ __ 0.1E OF LOT CORNER. I/ s \�` n4" �-r�' " �`� �`\ 12T \ i i\� rl (1110712020) I k6 / -- _ :4 11 `� �i / AU4�--F€AICE-lam N�� -\-z\ " i \ \ `- -440, 00 1.2'W OF LOT LINE / I II I e/ --,z12S_� ��\`7 N � \ � .7 '!i \\� -r- �' �\ \ FENCE CROSSES82 / 71' 1 `y t7� \ \ / `N\ \ LOT LINE 55.8N. / 4 NI,`��7--i> 17162 \I \ OF LOT CORNER. a / �171 0 , `�2 h--�- �- i h \/ 1 LbT 4\ N w CORNER FENCE /S VILLAGER 1 1 / co / / �� x'��\ v 1 n . `\ \ _7 , /1 / 1�lso 1 5'CLFNC J / \ 17161 \ / 1.2'W. OF LOT LINE >s 1 �1 / 1 />�� ~ '$ Fa 1 1 „ \ / �\ \ I .r ; \� 20 �c 12o"c \y ` - - - REC. NO, 8112285001 _ �/ _ a rA l ' 1 '' �yT'�-- 7122t1-� \ l +,, ,`%,ram �\ FENCE CROSSES j, I/1 I I / -� V / 1 \ \ � 11� � ZC / / \ FENCE CROSSES I Y + \ \ r y�� \ LOT LINE 9.8'N. OF 5 �\� „ � � , k ,T�,g INE 9. 8'N. OF , � 1 L O T CORNER. I I' 111 1lSGT `1 T�!} \ \Vi��\��\`x ���,j " �E�pf�_-�� T L2 ' �I IV 1 �,, -\''S' /4 1 �\ �j/ ��. \ fjj, `>fi-F'` `� cam/ FENCE INTERSE I I 1 n \ I �\ a E -1 a �\ \ \ �� 3 \ �, \ '� 1 F 1 " " , 17z5a 1 ° CEO SL N ,r GATE 161 / \ \ s h1 41LOT LINE\ G E IS 0.4E. OF LOT 8 C �\ 1 1 Z�\ / \ ' 6'CLFNC 10582 \�\ �\ / I iZ144 `: I 1715 ���17�152�/� / /7154 1 8"C 10579 %0577 1_ / `I \ �\ s� N / , 22'F� �1� I -+--- 20�HEM 1 4 F fo"n�'^ ..�Z6 E. �ND FENCE I I 1 I T I �0' / \ N \`. / �\ ``L714h�.\ 1 \1�BNEM/ _ __L_ , fo"H \ c /S Or T LINE. 1 1 !' ? ' tD -1 ` 123 91 \� \ b� i 2eF/ - : ti / 1 / // �'' 1 �� r i�`8� r i ili - 1 . . \ 1 \ . . . .. _ ,-- N 89 45 F . .�. \ 26� \ �� �! \ / z� \ . %� sSj} \ �- - N -'` - �� 1�'st4 �2,.T_s�G�k_ �- �_�/ i S6 ` i FOUND 1/2" REBAR Y \ 4._ ,,_ / F�. END F'r\N,CE AND SMASHED CAP �T_f7 SW FEN�'E CORNEA l�N LO6,, E 0.1 %V. OF LOT CORNER �. ' 91r�%?. L^l 1077107 _ - 'r F #' fj - 1 - J 0.5 N.0.5'E. OF-Lf 539 / \ 2 .1079 .\ \1�A �% Q \ r� 1 a 7"` ter' .r, _ 1'�� iT�rl I oR E, /'\ i 1 (1110612020) 9 /I;' ii 'tom -�� 17 9y / itN87 �` 1 4�� �,' V� 1s \ ``�{��JC ' . `� �I TRACT 998 FI III I \ 10 I `1 1 F r� 2 F �/� _ f- �� �� 240N/4 W 1 I ' I -r ; ; `� I •\ i %% r ' / `\ f7 ' \\ 1 R Y wn,�I_/ 00 Vj ,(\ I /1c$ / 1 }a EIHO- ,/� i \ FOUND 1 2" REBAR I A 1 / Ir2 ��\ 'w"'ia1 l 2216- 111 / "'I -fit` 1 % 0" ' `` I I . 1 \ V^�` 601 r�1 7� 1 � _ � 11Q752 \ �� AND CAP "LSA 22969" ICI11\�\` 1 2 �- 1 % 1 `N\ \,'/ I 2K _ 1' CHICKEN l I� 1 i j ie vb I \ ' 1D�e I �'T 7 - \ / \ il?<53� " 0.1 N.x0.1 E OF LOT \ 1 / 'Dl FENCE I • 1 I o \ 32 F I, I CORNER I I 1 y. ,/ 4 A i � -' � nas� ^ � X •� - o \ ( \ � i\ '1 � (11/06/2020) _ l 7 a-�� , �\ F`,� , C 28"C� ♦ f0540 \ Yf i"�-� I \ 1 I /\ I 1\♦ \< \` \\ \` j 10755 i -�: ' 1TiYF - If \ 4' l f0 0\ \\ I 1 12"F/ L� 1075ii \~ 096 / Z \ I `a ���-� I II ill r %S' � / / \ / 0098 FENCE INTERSECTION Fa t�Cy\/ Z6 x \ �a�_ . 2" \ i ` \\ 1 or \I / F , d�c% / 1 \ X- � 1 \ v _\ 10 � � IS 0.5E. OF LOT LINE \ tb]39 \ I 107 / I , i `�� ` \ X/ I I `\ `\ I\ •-� 1� Q E EDGE GRA t EL IS F s/�7099� 1.5'W OF LOT LINE. \ CY 1 !- I \ , 16'C, mil, / , 1`N 40;q / \ \ ♦ { 1 1 ` \ 4 1 \ 4 kt N. 10507 N \` 3 47 �` \� \ � \ \`\ \`\ ; `\ 20 F i -- 1 `\ i \ { `�`, k'� C) FOUND 1/2" REBAR / AND CAP "LSA 22969" 34 \\ i ;I i "w `\\--� �/ \` \\ ��---_�� \ 1 i ,'' ^`. \1 �_J__ \ �I AT LOT CORNER. _ POW �R UTILITY r/ - PANT, NO SIGNAL E/ 1 -? 11/06�20� 500 \\ \N\ 2 \ `l \\ �\ F _ / 1 \ I ► / - E EDGE OF ASPHALT 117 1 / `\\ I \1 I/�/T / 1 f044\ / \I--� \ / \ -4-4 AD i �r1\ ' =\� 0,a1o4se� �iQ W j -I�\ s�� ; / 1o�v\� i \ to37�\ II \I 0 CROSSES LOT LINE 7.2S. OF I 'r 0841 / \ x o P \ I \ \ 4`F I FOUND REBAR AND CAP. 1 a 1 1 1 17078\ -l� I o I ' DlI?T _- \ s TT EDMUNDS HIGHLANDS 1 1 o I l \ 17083 Q v ♦ \ \ / / \ \ L�- o I 1 I \ ``/ \ �+ ` - `` �' ` ` ` -� > ' ' \ ` / 3 ` REC. NO, 200404125344 P TH ` I 1 I \ II 11 . `� \-/ 1 r� T� i / 1 O �I I I 1 0251 \ 170(� L 1 1082 `�� 1/ `st �� O= /]� " ! / J `� I ` `� ♦ / , `\ 1 1 11 I I 5`k4'PQ`-`►"cl ob\ _68 <[� --i h__� - �\ t �\_`� / . I \ I\ Y \ j a70�1 ,1-707 '1 -Nw N�� -L! \ \\ �/6 r , ,��� \\ \ � II 1 �03C 1 `8"', + >�0497 `\�,' \� {��7---J` 10352 \1X7 �1`I I \ III 1 ,JB: M \-___ I I A 3 I �� II �-/ 8�'�L\ Q'%y�1 Ii'I / 1 �/n / ON1 1P \ 1 \ j 4� O i I I ^ I III I \ \ I 1 I I ` / I 1 1 / 170,39 / \ � fCUFiG7�` / � F'` / 1 \ I 1034� I / t��44 I. l-�` 3�s / `\ 1 \ � �\\ 2 ��UND 1/2" REBAR 11 1 I 1 �`�41,1 1 F / /{ 11 8pI M_1./---G/\8 �\ � \./AND CAP "LSA 22969" I11 'kN� -{17-/I 1 I I 1 , 7j 1 � �� .' 1 ,� 1 ,'� �3 � \ / 1g✓=- 1 Al LOT CORNER. �\1.1019�< +ice o" - �- 1 CONC. BLOCK - I�Ih I 1 `(L� " 7 J'i fF II �P� to I �`I II `I I / / 1 � FENCE INTERSECTION r i \ \ ,JO F,�� 1 1 / / �- r _ = ` \ , i \ \ Z 1 0.6E. OF LOT LINE. \ \ 1 -� - �t--=' F 1I \ /� \ \ _ FENCE INTERSECTION L\ W45 \ \_ I- `\ 1034 N__ 1 � �1 � IS 0.6E. OF LOT LINE. / 1\ / �7777T7iiYi�, I', /"(sF k F �� IIF \ I OF I /k I \ / l 1 % I l \� l _/'1 / -�LT9 Q T� i- ��/ ' /7'/ 7ZtT ' " , �1 ` I \ I 10 `try �:.. 3b 1 / / /`�[c-/-��`F ,I 4-1-{-rV'C'TU (i i-� / 7 /�FFE-470.0'_- `VVIN 111 1 / mil--J \ I IQ 1 2 I I 1 ' �5g11 9125 240TH ST SW �'�\`►1,;� -� \ /\7 /' ,J1_09 240TH_ST I A0314 1 i \\ i \ I / I 1 I J 1.5 STORY WOOD , /< /. ,1_ / / \ 7 /, FOUND 1 2" REBAR i / ` �\ / {' I/ I _ yL `' ` 8465 \ ,/ 1 STOf�`Y WOOD ERA '� II I I \ / ' I ,\' I\�`\�� AND CAP 'LSA 22969" /f, / FF� FRAME HOUSE _ \ yI \ 1 , M 1 x I\ �17010` \ '. - ��---OUP w&9,SElu7�NT \ �1 1 _ �. / ` ��((/ __ / #03 0.1E OF LOT CORNER. I/�j �`I�II\\ \\1I �� 11 ' . E- / \`� `�` - o7� r3r1 " � - / (1110612020) I I' 11 /1°r- tmQ19 Q , II�y=lL/�/ �T� �IQ31- \1- 1 5 1 II�sp& ' - I1 /v /� I;�IIr -/� ll- - s' \-1 \I ------- 1 I \ L-a' >Is2 J��1.� 54 _ 0 1 / \ I \ t v ` / -ram _ ' 1 111 h \ � I 1 x FENCE INTERSECTION 1 I IIII\r1 �i I 1 - �� i\� _ V _I I - - - - 3' . k, I.io3C�. l I o31� _� \ I \ \ 1�39 0.6E OF LOT LINE. ` I I�\ �/ �\ V8 / \ / / Y /\ \ 1 33 f081P1 4"C/ - L} \ \ �1 / �"(-p�'fJE i°K -i� tl� 1 / / f07\ / _ 20 F \ 11th L- v � - J / X 1 . < . "C - - / 22" t 103 ylO F , I 6'BFNC N EDGE ASPHALT ICI I 1� \/ 110736 \ l `� � - ' ` ` 11032g c�� F `x 1, \ �� IS 18.6'E. OF LOT I I �� \ I / , iN0 \ 1 1064X`_I - "14 F/r'�` `L_ 1 - 6kt�31�2 `\ 1 \>/1 `O�F ♦ 1 ; 11 SW FENCE i _ __1----r-�- lL I\ o \� CORNER. \ w s - 1 I �- \ \ I > $ { I 22 Fl\ I I _ 1 1-__ -11> 2�� I \ I > I IHL`F\ y\ , N ? I"F CORNER IS 1. 1 'E. 70PI .y T_� >` I 31�9 OF LOT L/NE. %L- _ _ _ iD \ �. -� 1 I 1 E EDGE ASPHALT 1�5� 1 _�4C"Z4 -i' \=�\ 'i _r;c ` 1� �3� F �`fp�j ` I " -�-`\•__i _ I \ �_ ��-� F\ IS 3.5'W. OF LOT -��5 1 I 1- 8 CYj \/ \ _� i� � 15 -Z� 0 �0- `_ _ 'f 1s r CORNER. 1\ III 1 \1700d`-,4• _"{_ .% � 1os 5+,� � � � � � 'I CB 10020 tlo max_ �6 �t \ v / RIM 428.46 ` \ ; FOUND 1 2" REBAR 1 .� ♦F _ 6 6" PVC lE 423.92 (N) 1 \ - _ _ �_`•� `y. �_ ►\ I AND CAP "LSA 22969" 12 DI lE 423.55 (E) / - -1� '\�A� _� c _ r ��. _�� r",_, __-�` 1 cv 1cPtr yE . / i \ _ - ---- 8' DI 1E 423.42 SW O /1 0 ` ____ ----- - - O iP' -o �6 "�� �� `. �;�s:Qb--, j�HPI\ ` OH - - -SD 0 ( ) \ k' -� - -�-}-p-- _Q \ ; L�0644 .�/ `\ `T_ --sD- ={}kiP_ 9i�BE3S'FS7VµTfl- EH#lfd3 /y_B -? �_ -_ �- \ _ _ _ _ _ -W ----OHP M \IVY- _ �I--�--mil - - W-- -- -r- - - \ -� I - / _T - - I I I IADDRES ES \ �I _ _ _ \ CULV 12"CVC IE = 433.90' FOUNDERAlJD CAP 294.oa1a1.oz' / W/TRASH RACK j �_ ` ar4 ASS - SS + 1z7.1�3 G� 1 Za (12/16/20) � ��b'_ - -SS ---�\ -SS - - � SS - - - ASS - - \ 6S�� \ \ CB 10018 - G ` } - "LIMITED S1�1_ DISTANCE" - _ RIM 427.19 �� - - -M G- -¢ _ \ jam¢ R,a� T � N T PST 12" DI 1E 423.71 ) _ / 7 �LBOX `� ADDRESS ON P9iST \ �Ro i RR2 sr�R _ 6 .� 8" Dl lE 423.09 ^1�1 �1 It 12" DI 1E 422.88 8" CONC 1E 418.82 (E) 8" CONC 1E 418.76 (S) FOUND X' IN 1 1/2" BRASS DISK STAMPED "WSI 16916" IN 4"X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.4' IN CASE 0.08'W. OF SECTION LINE (1110612020) \ I KIOSK NO PARKING 17 - --------------------------------E�STPF-MER,�-L- IBM A' SDMH 10043 N O I STREET RIM 432.15 ELEV.=429.50' 12" CONC 1E 427.42 (E) SSMH 10118 t LQ 12" CONC 1E 423.74 (W) FOUND X' IN 1 3/4" RIM 452.30 N BRASS DISK IN 4'X4" 6" CONC 1E 445.85 (N) CONCRETE MONUMENT 8" CONC 1E 444.77 (W) DOWN 0.3' IN CASE. (1110612020) �-v ---- - TBM B' ELEV. = 455.40' FOUND X' IN 1 3/4" BRASS DISK IN 4'X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.3' IN CASE. (1110612020) VERTICAL DATUM NAVD '88 AS VERIFIED TO SNOHOMISH COUNTY CONTROL POINT 25. BENCH MARK ORIGINATING BENCHMARK SNOHOMISH COUNTY CONTROL POINT 25 FOUND INVERTED NAIL IN CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 1.0' IN CASE AT THE CENTERLINE OF 236TH ST SW A T THE INTERSECTION WI TH 92ND A VE W. ELEVA TION. 442. 74' IBM A' AT FOUND 'X' IN 1-1/2" BRASS DISK STAMPED "WSI 15916" IN 4'X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.4' IN CASE LOCATED AT THE SCALE.1" = JO' INTERSECTION OF 240TH ST SW & 92ND AVE W. 0 15 30 60 ELEVATION: 429.50' IBM B' AT FOUND X' IN 1 3/4" BRASS DISK IN 4'X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT DOWN 0.3' IN CASE LOCATED AT THE CENTERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 240TH ST SW, SOUTH OF HOUSE NO. 9019. ELEVA TION: 455.40' TREE LEGEND TREE TAG NUMBER & DESCRIPTION _ xxx _ xxx EXISTING TREE � i DRIP LINE LEGEND - EXISTING UTILITIES / FEATURES X WIRE FENCE EX REBAR -0- POWER POLE 0 CHAIN LINK FENCE E- GUY ANCHOR ❑ WOOD FENCE SECTION M Y STREET LIGHT DITCH OR SWALE r-:� QUARTER SECTION POLE LIGHT n n n n GUARDRAIL ® EX MONUMENT © POWER VAULT RETAINING WALL ROCKERY ❑ ASPHALT W TRANSFORMER -------FLOW .®' POWER METER - - - - - - - CURB ❑ CONCRETE Z JUNCTION BOX -- - - - - - ASPHALT ❑O GAS METER -- - - - - - CONCRETE ❑ GRAVEL -------GRAVEL GAS VALVE ------------- ROOF a WETLAND FIBER OPTICS MANHOLE CHANNELIZA TION B TV RISER DRIP LINE ❑ CATCH BASIN, TYPE I � TELECOMM VAULT - SURFACE FEATURES 0❑ CATCH BASIN, TYPE ll ❑ TELECOMM RISER Ll11Ll/1/1/1/1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT Q SD PIPE FLOW - - - - - - - - - TOP OF 40% SLOPE Qo YARD DRAIN Z TELECOMM JUNCTION BOX - - - - - STEEP SLOPE BUFFER EZ::_ TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 STORM CLEANOUT - - EDGE OF WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER STORM CULVERT END o MAIL BOX - - -190- - - 10' CONTOURS SEWER MANHOLE JZ SIGN ------ 192------ 2' CONTOURS 0 SEWER CLEANOUT ® BOLLARD ----SD- STORM DRAIN PIPE 4 • SOIL LOG TEST PIT ----SS- SEWER MAIN SS PIPE FLOW ----FM- SEWER FORCE MAIN ® SEPTIC LID CONIFEROUS TREE ----W- WA TER MAIN R FIRE HYDRANT - - - OHP AERIAL POWER LINE EEI- WATER METER 0 DECIDUOUS TREE P BURIED POWER LINE ----G- GAS MAIN pd GATE VALVE C BURIED CABLE OW WATER MANHOLE - -TV- BURIED TV '7 AIR/VAC RELEASE VALVE T BURIED TELEPHONE LINE 0- BLOW OFF P/T BURIED POWER/TELEPHONE ® IRRIGATION METER - FO- BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE IRRIGATION VALVE Know what"s below, Call before you dig. 1 STREET �oO�D Axis REDMOND, WA TEL. 425.823-5700 98052 p� Survey & Mapping FAX 425.823-6700 THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVS/ON 1 OF A WASHINGTON STA TE PROFESSIONAL _ LAND SURVEYOR s'r� AXIS PROJECT 20 229 Est f i i I nY I, 7.13.b RAM ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering / Land Planning 16531 13TH AVE W, SUITE A108 LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 PHONE: (425) 678-6960 WWW.RAMENGINEERINGINC.COM Ma i 0 a fa rn L4 rn V � Y L m Z w o Z = O W >Z Q Wcn N Z O O d \ U Lift Z v v Q m � O W W 40 oqj�' pF WAS�f �Q� ti� coo r�4�Av?/ t71!;�, IO>\1e ROB L. LONG, PE DRAWN BY.• MIKE MORRIS ISSUE DA TE.• SCALE.• 619121 AS NOTED JOB NO: 20-024 SHEET: EC-01 SHT 2 OF 2 Packet Pg. 261 7.14 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with HBB for Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization - Stage 2 Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On February 16, 2021, the Mayor approved the Professional Services Agreement with HBB for the Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization project. On October 21', 2021, the Mayor approved Supplemental Agreement with HBB for the Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization project. On May 10, 2022, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was placed on the May 17, 2022 consent agenda for City Council approval. Staff Recommendation Approve Supplemental Agreement. Narrative The design phase of the Gateway Signs are nearing completion. When the initial scope of work was developed with HBB, the material of the proposed signs were unknown. The material for both signs have been selected and will be aluminum with concrete pier foundations. Due to this selected material, a structural analysis needs to be completed (as part of the design phase) and CG Engineering will complete this task. The additional services included in the scope of work also includes potential construction services from CG Engineering. The design phase of the Gateway Signs are scheduled to be completed in June 2022 and the installation is currently scheduled for Fall 2022. This task is being paid by Connecting Washington funds and local funds (funding source for Highway 99 project). Staff and the consultant have agreed on a scope of services and budget for this supplement, in the amount of $10,000 (increasing the HBB contract from $133,235 to $143,235). The fee for the structural review is $5,000 and a $5,000 management reserve is included for unforeseen work or changes that may be needed prior to issuing a contract to construct the Gateway Signs. Attachments: Attachment 1 - HBB Supplemental Agreement Packet Pg. 262 7.14.a Washington State Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number 02 Hough Beck & Baird Inc. 2101 4th Avenue, Suite 1800 Original Agreement Number Seattle, WA 98121 E20CE/i055 Phone: 206-682-3051 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date March 4, 2021 December 31, 2022 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Highway 99 Revitalization & Gateway - Stage 2 $143,232.30 Description of Work See Exhibit A - HBB Scope of Work. See Exhibit B - CG Engineering Scope of Work. The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with fiougb Beck & Baird Inc.. and executed on and identified as Agreement No. E20CE/i055 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: See Exhibit A - HBB Scope of Work. See Exhibit B - CG Engineering Scope of Work. 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: N.A. III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: Increase Contract amount by $10,000.00. as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: City of Edmonds By: Hough Beck & Baird Inc. Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature Date DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 263 Ex 7.14.a Project: Highway 99 Gateway Signs Client: City of Edmonds Firm: HBB Landscape Architecture Date: 5111/2022 Scope of Work Principal PM / LA Design Comp./ Tech Contracts Admin Admin. TASK SUBTOTAL $ 75.00 $ 66.00 $ 44.001 $ 36.00 $ 56.00 $ 36.50 TASK 1. 1 Management Reserve Supplement 000000 $5,000.00 LUMP SUM $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 1 of 1 P:12021 Projects12021-10 Edmonds HWY 99 GatewaylAdmin101-ContractslManagemetn Reserve SupplimentlHBB Management Reserve Suppleme Packet Pg. 264 Supplement Agreement #2 - Exh I7.14.a Ccivil & structural ENGINEERING engineering & planning CG Engineering, PLLC 250 4th Ave S, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 P - 425.778.8500 F — 425.778.5536 Website: cgengineering.com Project Name/Location: Highway 99 Gateway Signs City of Edmonds Scope/Intent and Extent of Services: As described in Exhibit A. Fee Arrangement: As described in Exhibit A. Payment terms: Retainer Waived* *Standard payment terms. Offered by: jam,.,,,,,• -�-� �,.y-- s/�r��. signature date Dennis Titus, PE, SE, Associate Principal printed name/title CG Engineering PLLC name of design professional firm Professional Services Agreement Client/Billing: Clayton Moss Forma 114 4th Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: May 11, 2022 Project #: CG Contact: Dirk Rogstad, PE, SE Project Contact: Name/Phone: ClaVton Moss/206.920.5912 Email: cmoss@formaseattle.com ASSUMPTIONS: Our fee is based upon the information provided us for the purposes of preparing this agreement and on our current understanding of the project. Any changes in the anticipated scope of work uncovered through the review of additional information related to this project and/or as a result of agency review may result in additional engineering fees. Accepted by: signature printed name/title name of client date The Terms and Conditions and the initials required on the second page of this form are a part of this Agreement. S:\2022 Proposals\Forma\Highway 99 Gateway\Highway 99 Gateway Signs 05.05.22.docx Page Packet Pg. 265 Agreement Between CG Engineering and Forma Construction Structural Engineering Services — Highway 99 Gateway Signs May 11, 2 7.14.a Page 2 of 5 Terms and Conditions The Firm shall perform the services outlined in this agreement for the stated fee arrangement. Dispute Resolution: Any claims or disputes made during design, construction or post -construction between the Client and Firm shall be submitted to non -binding mediation. Client and Firm agree to include a similar mediation agreement with all contractors, subcontractors, subconsultants, suppliers and fabricators, thereby providing for mediation as the primary method for dispute resolution between all parties. Billings/Payments: Invoices for the Firm's services shall be submitted either upon completion of such services or on a monthly basis at the Firm's option unless noted otherwise on Page 1 under fee arrangement. Invoices shall be payable within 30 days after the invoice date. If the invoice is not paid within 30 days, the Firm may, without waiving any claim or right against the Client, and without liability whatsoever to the Client, terminate the performance of the service. Retainers shall be credited on the final invoice. Late Payments: Accounts unpaid 30 days after the invoice date will be charged a monthly interest rate of 1.0% on the then unpaid balance. In the event any portion or all of an account remains unpaid 90 days after billing, the Client shall pay any costs of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees, and/or other related expenses. Initial here:_ (Firm) (Client). Delay of Performance: If effective authorization to proceed with the services is not given by Client for any reason within 3 months of the date of this Agreement or the performance of Firm's services is delayed or suspended for any reason for a period of 90 consecutive days, the Firm has the right to renegotiate the fees, or failing to reach mutual agreement on fees, to terminate its obligation for all tasks thereby delayed. Indemnification: The Client and the Firm mutually agree, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold each other harmless from any and all damage, liability or cost, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense, arising from their own negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of their services under this Agreement, to the extent that each party is responsible for such damages, liabilities and costs on a comparative basis of fault. Limitation of Liability: In recognition of the relative risks, rewards and benefits of the projects to both the Client and the Firm, the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Firm's total liability to the Client for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses, damages or claim expenses arising out of this agreement from any cause or causes, shall not exceed fee paid. Such causes include, but are not limited to, the Firm's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or breach of warranty. Initial here: J�a_ (Firm) (Client). Termination of Services: The Client or the Firm for any reason with or without cause may terminate this agreement. In the event of termination, the Client shall pay the Firm for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses, and reimbursable termination expenses. Ownership of documents: All documents produced by the Firm under this agreement shall remain the property of the Firm and may not be used by the Client for any other endeavor without the written consent of the Firm. 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 9 ph. 425.778.85 Packet Pg. 266 ENGINEERING www.cgengineering.com Agreement Between CG Engineering and Forma Construction Structural Engineering Services — Highway 99 Gateway Signs May 11, 20 7.14.a Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT `A' PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE Structural design is required for (2) City of Edmonds gateway signs located on Highway 99. Both signs will be constructed from aluminum members supporting metal lettering. The signs will be attached to concrete pier foundations (by others) with aluminum baseplates and steel anchor bolts. Wind and seismic forces will be considered in the design. TASK 1— STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS — NORTH SIGN • We will provide stamped structural calculations for permit. • We will provide a structural review and redlines the construction drawings (provided by Forma) with the necessary structural information. After the redlines have been incorporated into the drawings, we will provide a "structural review" stamp on the drawings. • Design of the sign foundation is by others and is excluded from this scope of work. • Specifications will be on the drawings in the form of notes. Detailed specifications are not part of this proposal. • We will respond to building department comments within our scope of work by providing a written response letter and making necessary revisions to obtain a building permit. • Construction services encompassing shop drawing review, substitution requests, instruction and interpretation of the drawings, periodic site visits, and responses to contractor's questions & RFI's will be provided for this project on a time and expense basis as needed. ESTIMATED FEE: NTE $2,500.00 Initial here to authorize this task To be invoiced on a percent complete basis at the enclosed rates TASK 2 — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS — SOUTH SIGN • We will provide stamped structural calculations for permit. • We will provide a structural review and redlines the construction drawings (provided by Forma) with the necessary structural information. After the redlines have been incorporated into the drawings, we will provide a "structural review" stamp on the drawings. • Design of the sign foundation is by others and is excluded from this scope of work. • Specifications will be on the drawings in the form of notes. Detailed specifications are not part of this proposal. • We will respond to building department comments within our scope of work by providing a written response letter and making necessary revisions to obtain a building permit. • Construction services encompassing shop drawing review, substitution requests, instruction and interpretation of the drawings, periodic site visits, and responses to contractor's questions & RFI's will be provided for this project on a time and expense basis as needed. ESTIMATED FEE: NTE $2,500.00 Initial here to authorize this task To be invoiced on a percent complete basis at the enclosed rates 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 C CM Edmonds, WA ENGINEERING ph. 425.778.85 Packet Pg. 267 www.cgenaineering.com Agreement Between CG Engineering and Forma Construction Structural Engineering Services — Highway 99 Gateway Signs May 11, 2 7.14.a Page 4 of 5 ADDITIONAL SERVICES THAT MAY BE REQUIRED The following items, sometimes necessary for a project, are not included in our scope of work but can be provided as Additional Services if requested: • We will work to design a cost-efficient structure, but value -engineering services undertaken after preliminary design has been completed will be an Additional Service. • Engineering services not expressly identified in this scope of work. • Revisions due to owner or contractor -initiated changes, or changes required due to unforeseen conditions ASSUMPTIONS Our fee is based upon the information provided us for the purposes of preparing this agreement and on our current understanding of the project. Any changes in the anticipated scope of work uncovered through the review of additional information related to this project and/or as a result of agency review may result in additional engineering fees. 250 Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, ds, WA ENGINEERING ph. 425.778.85 Packet Pg. 268 www.cRenRineerinR.com Agreement Between CG Engineering and Forma Construction Structural Engineering Services — Highway 99 Gateway Signs May 11, 2 7.14.a Page 5 of 5 2022 Schedule of Charges Personnel Charges Hourly Rate Managing Principal $250.00 Principal $230.00 Associate Principal $205.00 Project Manager $185.00 Structural Engineer III $155.00 Structural Engineer II $135.00 Structural Engineer 1 $115.00 Civil Engineer III $155.00 Civil Engineer II $135.00 Civil Engineer 1 $115.00 Planner $145.00 CAD Drafter III $120.00 CAD Drafter II $105.00 CAD Drafter 1 $90.00 Clerical $90.00 Expert Witness $300.00 Reimbursable expenses for items such as plotting, reproduction, and mileage (0.585/mile), shall be invoiced at costs plus 12%. These rates are subject to change. 250 4th Avenue South, Suite 200 C CM Edmonds, WA ENGINEERING ph. 425.778.85 Packet Pg. 269 www.caenizineerinR.com 7.15 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Award Construction Contract for the 2022 Utility Replacement Project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 10, 2022, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was placed on the May 17, 2022 consent agenda for City Council approval. Staff Recommendation Award a construction contract to Shoreline Construction in the amount of $3,685,030.33 and authorize a management reserve of $552,755 for the 2022 Utility Replacement Project. Narrative This project is part of the City's program to replace and upgrade existing water lines, sewer lines, and storm lines at various locations around the City that are reaching the end of their useful service life, are undersized and unable to meet current requirements, or has some other existing system deficiency. This project is a combination of the annual water, sewer and storm replacement projects, which usually are completed at different times of the year and are bid separately. This year's projects designs were completed at approximately the same time allowing them to be combined into one bid package. This will save staff considerable project management and administration time and costs, since instead of three contracts, there will only be one contract to administer. The City received construction bids from Shoreline Construction and Marshbank Construction on May 5, 2022. Shoreline Construction submitted the low responsive bid of $3,685,030.33 and Marshbank Construction provided a bid of $4,257,104.74. The engineer's estimate was $3,581,500.00. A review of the low responsive bidder's record was completed and it was positive. Construction is expected to begin in June and be completed by the end of 2022. The project costs are being funded by the 421, 422, and 423 Utility Funds respectively. The scope of work for the sewer and stormwater replacement portions were increased to complete pipeline segments in one construction season instead of two. The added cost for this work will be paid from available 2022 sewer and stormwater funding for projects that have been postponed due to lack of staffing. Attachments: Attachment 1 - 2022 Utility Replacement map Attachment 2 - 2022 Utility Construction Budget and Funding Packet Pg. 270 City of Edmonds Mapbook 7.15.b 2022 Utility Replacement Project Proposed Construction Budget Description Amount Contract Award $ 3,685,030.33 Contract Award Management Reserve (15%) $ 552,754.55 Construction Management, Inspection & Testing (15%) $ 552,754.55 1% for the Arts $ 1,366.74 Total = $ 4,791,906.17 Construction Funding Funding Amount Water Fund $ 805,308.61 Storm Fund $ 2,035,528.05 Sewer Fund $ 1,951,069.51 Total = $ 4,791,906.17 Packet Pg. 272 7.16 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approve Local Agency Consultant Agreement with WSP for Construction Management Services on the Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization Stage 2 Project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 10, 2022, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was placed on the May 17, 2022 consent agenda for City Council approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the Local Agency Agreement. Narrative The Highway 99 Gateway -Revitalization Stage 2 project consists of the addition of a continuous landscaped raised median along Highway 99 from 2441" St. SW to 2101" St. SW with mid -block left turn pockets, a HAWK signal approximately 600' north of 2341" St. SW, and gateway signs on both ends of the corridor. This project will improve corridor safety by reducing high -angle vehicle accident rates with the removal of the center two-way left turn lane. The proposed HAWK signal will improve active transportation safety for pedestrians attempting to cross the corridor between the existing signalized intersection at 238t" St. SW and 2281" St. SW. The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in March to hire a consultant to support City staff with contract administration, material testing, community outreach and inspection services for this project. The City received statements of qualifications from two engineering firms and interviewed both firms in April. The selection committee chose WSP to provide the construction management services during construction based on their qualifications, experience and approach. The proposed agreement, scope of services and fee are included in Attachment 1. A brief summary of the scope of work is outlined below: Provide full time field Inspector Provide full time Office Engineer for contract administration Pre -construction services (such as attendance of pre -construction meeting and review of plans and specifications) Contract administration services for tracking/verifying/reviewing contractor's and sub- contractor's certified payroll, weekly statement of working days, WSDOT Reporting, tracking/verifying contractor's and sub -contractor's compliance documentation, force account tracking and payment, monitoring monthly apprentice reports, preparing weekly meeting agendas/minutes and project closeout documentation. Packet Pg. 273 7.16 Tracking/reviewing material submittals, request for information processing and maintaining record of materials incorporated into the project Material Testing Services including sampling, testing and test reports. Community Outreach Assist/track/review/comment of Change Orders, and requested Force Account Staff and consultant have agreed on a scope of services and budget for the agreement, in the amount of $636,578 (including $30,000 in management reserve). The construction management services provided under this agreement will be funded by the State Connecting Washington transportation funds. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Agreement Packet Pg. 274 7.16.a Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreemen Agreement Number: Firm/Organization Legal Name (do not use dba's): WSP USA Inc. Address Federal Aid Number 1001 4th Avenue, Ste. 3100, Seattle, WA 98154 UBI Number Federal TIN or SSN Number 600-275-529 11-1531569 Execution Date Completion Date June 30, 2023 1099 Form Required Federal Participation ❑ Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Yes ❑✓ No Project Title Highway 99 Revitalization and Gateway Project (Stage 2) Description of Work Provide construction management services to the City of Edmonds for this project. ❑i Yes ❑ No DBE Participation Total Amount Authorized: $606,578 ❑ Yes ❑ No MBE Participation Management Reserve Fund: $30,000 ❑ Yes ❑ No WBE Participation ❑✓ Yes ❑ No SBE Participation Maximum Amount Payable: $636,578 Index of Exhibits Exhibit A Scope of Work Exhibit B DBE Participation Exhibit C Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and Other Data Exhibit D Prime Consultant Cost Computations Exhibit E Sub -consultant Cost Computations Exhibit F Title VI Assurances Exhibit G Certification Documents Exhibit H Liability Insurance Increase Exhibit I Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures Exhibit J Consultant Claim Procedures r a Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 275 Revised 311112016 7.16.a THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as shown in the "Execution Date" box on page one (1) of this AGREEMENT, between the hereinafter called the "AGENCY," and the "Firm / Organization Name" referenced on page one (1) of this AGREEMENT, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the work referenced in "Description of Work" on page one (1) of this AGREEMENT and hereafter called the "SERVICES;" and does not have sufficient staff to meet the requires commitment and therefore deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provid the necessary SERVICES; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that they comply with the Washington State Statutes relating to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish consulting services to the AGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performance contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. General Description of Work The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above -described SERVICES as herein defined, and necessary to accomplish the completed work for this project. The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services, labor, and related equipment and, if applicable, sub -consultants and subcontractors necessary to conduct and complete the SERVICES as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT. II. General Scope of Work The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for these SERVICES is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The General Scope of Work was developed utilizing performance based contracting methodologies. III. General Requirements All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENT with outside agencies, groups, or individuals shall receive advance approval by the AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies, groups, and/or individuals shall be coordinated through the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination, progress, and presentation meetings with the AGENCY and/or such State, Federal, Community, City, or County officials, groups or individuals as may be requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation. The minimum required hours or days' notice shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "A." The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY, which will outline in written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the SERVICES in sufficient detail so that the progress of the SERVICES can easily be evaluated. The CONSULTANT, any sub -consultants, and the AGENCY shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, rules, codes, regulations, and all AGENCY policies and directives, applicable to the work to be performed under this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the Stat of Washington. Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 276 Revised 311112016 7.16.a Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) or Small Business Enterprises (SBE), if required, per 49 CFR Part 26, shall be shown on the heading of this AGREEMENT. If DBE firms are utilized at the commencement of this AGREEMENT, the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will a, be shown on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime co CONSULTANT is a DBE certified firm they must comply with the Commercial Useful Function (CUF) regulation c outlined in the AGENCY's "DBE Program Participation Plan" and perform a minimum of 30% of the total amount of this AGREEMENT. It is recommended, but not required, that non -DBE Prime CONSULTANTS perform a minimum of 30% of the total amount of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, is required to submit DBE Participation of the amounts paid to all DBE firms invoiced for this AGREEMENT. All Reports, PS&E materials, and other data furnished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned. All electronic files, prepared by the CONSULTANT, must meet the requirements as outlined in Exhibit "C — Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and other Data." All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products, including all electronic files, prepared by the CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for these SERVICES, and are the property of the AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others, acting through or on behalf of the AGENCY of any such instruments of service, not occurring as a part of this SERVICE, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the CONSULTANT. Any and all notices or requests required under this AGREEMENT shall be made in writing and sent to the other parry by (i) certified mail, return receipt requested, or (ii) by email or facsimile, to the address set forth below: If to AGENCY: Name: Robert English Agency: City of Edmonds Address: 121 5th Avenue N City: Edmonds Email: Phone: Facsimile: State: WA Zip: IV. Time for Beginning and Completion If to CONSULTANT: Name: Jill Marilley Agency: WSP USA Inc. Address: 1001 4th Avenue, Ste. 3100 City: Seattle State: WA Zip: 98154 Email: jill.m.marilley@wsp.com Phone: 206.398.5215 Facsimile: n/a The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in writing by the AGENCY. All work under this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT titled "Completion Date." The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT, but may be extended by the AGENCY in the event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or because of unavoidable delays caused by an act of GOD, governmental actions, or other conditions beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. A prior supplemental AGREEMENT issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the establishes completion time. Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 277 Revised 311112016 7.16.a V. Payment Provisions The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed SERVICES rendered under this AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for SERVICES performed or SERVICES rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete SERVICES, specified in Section II, "Scope of Work". The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR Part 31 (www.ecfr.gov). The estimate in support of the Cost Plus Fixed Fee amount is attached hereto as Exhibits "D" and "E" and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. A. Actual Costs: Payment for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the basis of the CONSULTANT'S actual cost plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, indirect cost rate and direct non -salary costs. 1. Direct (RAW) Labor Costs: The Direct (RAW) Labor Cost is the direct salary paid to principals, professional, technical, and clerical personnel for the time they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall maintain support data to verify the direct salary costs billed to the AGENCY. 2. Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) Costs: ICR Costs are those costs, other than direct costs, which are included as such on the books of the CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the ICR rates shown in attached Exhibits "D" and "E" of this AGREEMENT. Total ICR payment shall be based on Actual Costs. The AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT the actual ICR costs verified by audit, up to the Maximum Total Amount Payable, authorized under this AGREEMENT, when accumulated with all other Actual Costs. A summary of the CONSULTANT'S cost estimate and the ICR percentage is shown in Exhibits "D" and "E", attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT (prime and all sub -consultants) will submit to the AGENCY within six (6) months after the end of each firm's fisca year, an ICR schedule in the format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for the purpose of adjusting the ICR rate for billings received and paid during the fiscal year represented by the ICR schedule. It shall also be used for the computation of progress payments during the following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's ICR cost to reflect the actual rate. The ICR schedule will be sent to Email: ConsultantRates@wsdot.wa.gov. Failure to supply this information by either the prime CONSULTANT or any of their sub -consultants shall cause the AGENCY to withhold payment of the billed ICR costs until such time as the required information c is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved. J The AGENCY's Project Manager and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the a CONSULTANT'S books and records at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual ICR a rate, if they so desire. 3. Direct Non -Salary Costs: Direct Non -Salary Costs will be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to the c E CONSULTANT. These charges may include, but are not limited to, the following items: travel, printing, L long distance telephone, supplies, computer charges and fees of sub -consultants. Air or train travel will be Q reimbursed only to economy class levels unless otherwise approved by the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall comply with the rules and regulations regarding travel costs (excluding air, train, and rental car costs) in accordance with WSDOT's Accounting Manual M 13-82, Chapter 10 — Travel Rules and Procedures, an c revisions thereto. Air, train, and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with 48 Code of Federal 0 Regulations (CFR) Part 31.205-46 "Travel Costs." The billing for Direct Non -Salary Costs shall include an a itemized listing of the charges directly identifiable with the PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall maintain the original supporting documents in their office. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be E supplied to the AGENCY upon request. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided under this AGREEMENT. Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 278 Revised 311112016 7.16.a 2 Fixed Fee: The Fixed Fee, which represents the CONSULTANT'S profit, is shown in attached Exhibits "D" and "E" of this AGREEMENT. This fee is based on the Scope of Work defined in this AGREEMENT and the estimated person -hours required to perform the stated Scope of Work. In the event the CONSULTANT a, enters into a supplemental AGREEMENT for additional work, the supplemental AGREEMENT may y include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The Fixed Fee will be prorated c and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSULTANT and reported in the Monthly Progress Reports accompanying the billings. Any portion of the Fixed Fee earned but not previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the final payment, subject to the provisions of Section IX entitled "Termination of Agreement." 5. Management Reserve Fund (MRF): The AGENCY may desire to establish MRF to provide the Agreement Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of $100,000 or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the MRF is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. This fund may not be replenished. Any changes requiring additional costs in excess of the MRF shall be made in accordance with Section XIII, "Extra Work." 6. Maximum Total Amount Payable: The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, and the MRF. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in Section XIII, "Extra Work." No minimum amount payable is guaranteed under this AGREEMENT. B. Monthly Progress Payments: The CONSULTANT may submit billings to the AGENCY for reimbursement of Actual Costs plus the ICR and calculated fee on a monthly basis during the progress of the work. Such billings shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports required unde Section III, "General Requirements" of this AGREEMENT. The billings will be supported by an itemized listing for each item including Direct (RAW) Labor, Direct Non -Salary, and allowable ICR Costs to which will be added the prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the billed Direct (RAW) Labor costs for CONSULTANT employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of recording the names, titles, Direct (RAW) Labor rates, and present duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the interview. C. Final Payment: Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT, contingent, if applicable, upon receipt of all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, electronic data and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such Final Payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment, which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY b, the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY may pursue with respect to such claims. The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and at the time of final audit; all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within thirty (30) calendar days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment. The CONSULTANT has twenty (20) working days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to begin the appeal process to the AGENCY for audit findings. Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 279 Revised 311112016 7.16.a c VI. Inspection of Cost Records: The CONSULTANT and their sub -consultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the AGENCY and the United States, for a period of six (6) years after receipt of final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upo: & these records with the following exception: if any litigation, claim or audit arising out of, in connection with, y or related to this AGREEMENT is initiated before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the cost records and accounts shall be retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed. An interim or post audit may be performed on this AGREEMENT. The audit, if any, will be performed by the State Auditor, WSDOT's Internal Audit Office and/or at the request of the AGENCY's Project Manager. Sub -Contracting The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items of SERVICES as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the performance of any SERVICE under this AGREEMENT without prior written permission of the AGENCY. No permission for subcontracting shall create, between the AGENCY and sub -consultant, any contract or any other relationship. Compensation for this sub -consultant SERVICES shall be based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit "E" attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. The SERVICES of the sub -consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable identified in each sub - consultant cost estimate unless a prior written approval has been issued by the AGENCY. All reimbursable direct labor, indirect cost rate, direct non -salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub -consultant shall be negotiated and substantiated in accordance with section V "Payment Provisions" herein and shall be memorialized in a final written acknowledgement between the parties. All subcontracts shall contain all applicable provisions of this AGREEMENT, and the CONSULTANT shall requirf each sub -consultant or subcontractor, of any tier, to abide by the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. With respect to sub -consultant payment, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the STATE's Prompt Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39.76.011. The CONSULTANT, sub -recipient, or sub -consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts. Failure by the CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT, which may result in the termination of this AGREEMENT or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate. VII. Employment and Organizational Conflict of Interest The CONSULTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annu this AGREEMENT without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from this AGREEMENT price or consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCY, and any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's E aD L a� c m E a c d E ¢ Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 280 Revised 311112016 7.16.a Compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT's employees or other persons while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligatioi a, and responsibility of the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full- or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of this AGREEMENT, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been, at any time during the period of this AGREEMENT, in the employ of the United States Department of Transportation or the AGENCY, except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the public employer of such person if he/she will be working on this AGREEMENT for the CONSULTANT. VIII. Nondiscrimination During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, sub -consultants, subcontractors and successors in interest, agrees to comply with the following laws and regulations: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. Chapter 21 Subchapter V § 2000d through 2000d-4a) • Federal -aid Highway Act of 1973 (23 U.S.C. Chapter 3 § 324) • Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. Chapter 16 Subchapter V § 794) • Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. Chapter 76 § 6101 et. seq.) • Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-259) • American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Chapter 126 § 12101 et. seq.) • 23 CFR Part 200 • 49 CFR Part 21 • 49 CFR Part 26 • RCW 49.60.180 In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CONSULTANT is bound by the provisions of Exhibit "F' attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT, and shall include the attached Exhibit "F" ir every sub -contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. IX. Termination of Agreement The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time with or without cause upon ten (10) days written notice to the CONSULTANT. In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY, other than for default on the part of the CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged and any appropriate fixed fee percentage at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT, plus any direct non -salary costs incurred up t, the time of termination of this AGREEMENT. No payment shall be made for any SERVICES completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the CONSULTANT of the notice to terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notic of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due when computed as set forth in paragraph two (2) of this section, then no final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any excess paid. If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSULTANT the above formula for payment shall not apply. In the event of a termination for default, the amount to be paid to the CONSULTANT shall be determined by the AGENCY with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing SERVICES to the date of termination, the amount of SERVICES originally required which was satisfactorily completed to Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 281 Revised 311112016 7.16.a date of termination, whether that SERVICE is in a form or a type which is usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination, the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the SERVICES required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY of the SERVICES a, performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed th, amount, which would have been made using the formula set forth in paragraph two (2) of this section. If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT's failure to perform is without the CONSULTANT's or its employee's fault or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY. In such an event, the CONSULTANT would be reimbursed for actual costs and appropriate fixed fee percentage in accordance with the termination for other than default clauses listed previously. The CONSULTANT shall, within 15 days, notify the AGENCY in writing, in the event of the death of any member partner, or officer of the CONSULTANT or the death or change of any of the CONSULTANT's supervisory and/or other key personnel assigned to the project or disaffiliation of any principally involved CONSULTANT employee. The CONSULTANT shall also notify the AGENCY, in writing, in the event of the sale or transfer of 50% or more of the beneficial ownership of the CONSULTANT within 15 days of such sale or transfer occurring. The CONSULTANT shall continue to be obligated to complete the SERVICES under the terms of this AGREEMENT unless the AGENCY chooses to terminate this AGREEMENT for convenience or chooses to renegotiate any term(s of this AGREEMENT. If termination for convenience occurs, final payment will be made to the CONSULTANT as set forth in the second and third paragraphs of this section. Payment for any part of the SERVICES by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of any type it may have against the CONSULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CONSULTANT, or for failure of the CONSULTANT to perform SERVICES required of it by the AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those right; with respect to any future act or omission by the CONSULTANT. X. Changes of Work The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the completed work of this AGREEMENT as necessary to correct errors appearing therein, without additional compensation thereof. Should the AGENCY find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed SERVICES or parts thereof changed of revised, the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under section XIII "Extra Work." XI. Disputes Q Any disputed issue not resolved pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be submitted in writing within 0. a 10 days to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT; provided however, that if an action is brought challenging the E Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be subject to judicial review. If the parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree, disputes concerning alleged design errors will be conducted under Q the procedures found in Exhibit "J". In the event that either party deem it necessary to institute legal action or r proceeding to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, this action shall be initiated in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located. The parties hereto E agree that all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties have the right of o appeal from such decisions of the Superior Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The a CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located. E Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 282 Revised 311112016 7.16.a XII. Legal Relations The CONSULTANT, any sub -consultants, and the AGENCY shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, rules, codes, regulations and all AGENCY policies and directives, applicable to the work to be performed under thi AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and hold The State of Washington (STATE) and the AGENCY and their officers and employees harmless from all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the negligence of, or the breach of any obligation under this AGREEMENT by, the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable; provided that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to defend or indemnify the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers and employees against and hold harmless the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers and employees from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the negligence of, or breach of any obligation under this AGREEMENT by the STATE and the AGENCY, their agents, officers, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the STATE and/or the AGENCY may be legally liable; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT is legall liable, and (b) the STATE and/or AGENCY, their agents, officers, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors and c vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the STATE and or AGENCY may be legally liable, the defense and indemnity obligation shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable. This provision shall be included in any AGREEMENT between CONSULTANT and any sub -consultant, subcontractor and vendor, of any tier. The CONSULTANT shall also defend, indemnify, and hold the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers and employees harmless from all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly improper appropriation or use of trade secrets, patents, proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or inventions by the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable, in performance of the Work under this AGREEMENT or arising out of any use in connection with the AGREEMENT of methods, processes, designs, information or other items furnished or communicated to STATE and/or the AGENCY, their agents, officers and employees pursuant to the AGREEMENT; provided that this indemnity shall not apply to any alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly improper appropriation or use of trade secrets, patents, proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or inventions resulting from STATE and/or AGENCY'S, their agents', officers' and employees' failure to comply with specific written instructions regarding use provided to STATE and/or AGENCY, their agents, officers and employees by the CONSULTANT, its agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, of any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable. The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor. Notwithstanding any determination by the Executive Ethics Board or other tribunal, the AGENCY may, in its sole discretion, by written notice to the CONSULTANT terminate this AGREEMENT if it is found after due notice and examination by the AGENCY that there is a violation of the Ethics in Public Service Act, Chapter 42.52 RCW; or any similar statute involving the CONSULTANT in the procurement of, or performance under, this AGREEMENT The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT's own employees or its agents against the STATE and /or the AGENCY and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated between the Parties. Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 283 Revised 311112016 7.16.a Unless otherwise specified in this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject to the processing of a new sole source, or an acceptable supplemental AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT shall provide On -Call assistance to the AGENCY during contrac administration. By providing such assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for: proper construction techniques, job site safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of this AGREEMENT, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Insurance Coverage A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE. B. Commercial general liability insurance written under ISO Form CG 00 01 12 04 or its equivalent with minimur limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the aggregate for each policy period. C. Business auto liability insurance written under ISO Form CG 00 01 10 01 or equivalent providing coverage for any "Auto" (Symbol 1) used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit for each occurrence. Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance, the STATE and AGENCY, their officers, employees, and agents will be named on all policies of CONSULTANT and any sub - consultant and/or subcontractor as an additional insured (the "AIs"), with no restrictions or limitations concerning products and completed operations coverage. This coverage shall be primary coverage and non-contributory and any coverage maintained by the AIs shall be excess over, and shall not contribute with, the additional insured coverage required hereunder. The CONSULTANT's and the sub -consultant's and/or subcontractor's insurer shall waive any and all rights of subrogation against the AIs. The CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with verification of insurance and endorsements required by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen (14) days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to: Name: Robert English Agency: City of Edmonds Address: 121 5th Ave N. City: Edmonds Email: Phone: Facsimile: State: WA Zip: 98020 No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the AGENCY, including that which may arise in reference to section IX "Termination of Agreement" of this AGREEMENT, shall be limited to the accumulative amount of the authorized AGREEMENT amount or one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), whichever is greater, unless the limit of liability is increased by the AGENCY pursuant to Exhibit H. In no case shall the CONSULTANT's professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 284 Revised 311112016 7.16.a The parties enter into this AGREEMENT for the sole benefit of the parties, and to the exclusion of any third party, and no third party beneficiary is intended or created by the execution of this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under section V "Payment Provisions" until the CONSULTANT has fully complied with this section. This remedy is not exclusive; and the AGENCY may take such other action as is available to it under other provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law. XIII. Extra Work A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of this AGREEMENZ in the SERVICES to be performed. B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the SERVICES under this AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the order, or otherwise affects any other terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment in the: (1) maximum amount payable; (2) delivery or completion schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms and shall modify this AGREEMENT accordingly. C. The CONSULTANT must submit any "request for equitable adjustment," hereafter referred to as "CLAIM," under this clause within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the written order. However, if the AGENCI decides that the facts justify it, the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLAIM submitted before final payment of this AGREEMENT. D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the section XI "Disputes" clause. However, nothing in this clause shall excuse the CONSULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed. E. Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs (A.) and (B.) above, the maximum amount payable for this AGREEMENT, shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement to this AGREEMENT. XIV. Endorsement of Plans If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans, estimates, or any other engineering data furnished by them. XV. Federal Review The Federal Highway Administration shall have the right to participate in the review or examination of the SERVICES in progress. XVI. Certification of the Consultant and the Agency g Attached hereto as Exhibit "G-1(a and b)" are the Certifications of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, Exhibit "G-2" Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions, Exhibit "G-3" Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying Q and Exhibit "G-4" Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibit "G-3" is required only in AGREEMENT's T over one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and Exhibit "G-4" is required only in AGREEMENT's over five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00.) These Exhibits must be executed by the CONSULTANT, and E submitted with the master AGREEMENT, and returned to the AGENCY at the address listed in section III "Genera Requirements" prior to its performance of any SERVICES under this AGREEMENT. a r c d E Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 285 Revised 311112016 7.16.a XVII. Complete Agreement This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the parties. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for, any statement, representation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, o modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as a supplement to this AGREEMENT. XVIII. Execution and Acceptance This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and AGREEMENT's contained in the proposal, and the supporting material submitted by the CONSULTANT, and does hereby accept this AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. XIX. Protection of Confidential Information The CONSULTANT acknowledges that some of the material and information that may come into its possession or knowledge in connection with this AGREEMENT or its performance may consist of information that is exempt from disclosure to the public or other unauthorized persons under either chapter 42.56 RCW or other local, state or federal statutes ("State's Confidential Information"). The "State's Confidential Information" includes, but is not limited to, names, addresses, Social Security numbers, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, financial profiles, credit card information, driver's license numbers, medical data, law enforcement records (or any other information identifiable to an individual), STATE and AGENCY source code or object code, STATE and AGENCY security data, non-public Specifications, STATE and AGENCY non -publicly available data, proprietary software, State security data, or information which may jeopardize any part of the project that relates to any of these types of information. The CONSULTANT agrees to hold the State's Confidential Information in strictest confidence and not to make use of the State's Confidential Information for any purpose other than the performance of this AGREEMENT, to release it only to authorized employees, sub -consultants or subcontractors requiring such information for the purposes of carrying out this AGREEMENT, and not to release, divulge, publish, transfer, sell, disclose, or otherwise make it known to any other party without the AGENCY's express written consent or as provided by law. The CONSULTANT agrees to release such information or material only to employees, sub -consultants or subcontractors who have signed a nondisclosure AGREEMENT, the terms of which have been previously approved by the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT agrees to implement physical, electronic, and managerial safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the State's Confidential Information. Immediately upon expiration or termination of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT shall, at the AGENCY's a option: (i) certify to the AGENCY that the CONSULTANT has destroyed all of the State's Confidential Information; or (ii) returned all of the State's Confidential Information to the AGENCY, or (iii) take whatever other E steps the AGENCY requires of the CONSULTANT to protect the State's Confidential Information. L As required under Executive Order 00-03, the CONSULTANT shall maintain a log documenting the following: Q the State's Confidential Information received in the performance of this AGREEMENT; the purpose(s) for which the State's Confidential Information was received; who received, maintained and used the State's Confidential m Information; and the final disposition of the State's Confidential Information. The CONSULTANT's records shall be subject to inspection, review, or audit upon reasonable notice from the AGENCY. a The AGENCY reserves the right to monitor, audit, or investigate the use of the State's Confidential Information collected, used, or acquired by the CONSULTANT through this AGREEMENT. The monitoring, auditing, or investigating may include, but is not limited to, salting databases. Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 286 Revised 311112016 7.16.a Violation of this section by the CONSULTANT or its sub -consultants or subcontractors may result in termination of this AGREEMENT and demand for return of all State's Confidential Information, monetary damages, or penalties. It is understood and acknowledged that the CONSULTANT may provide the AGENCY with information which is proprietary and/or confidential during the term of this AGREEMENT. The parties agree to maintain the confidentiality of such information during the term of this AGREEMENT and afterwards. All materials containing such proprietary and/or confidential information shall be clearly identified and marked as "Confidential" and shall be returned to the disclosing party at the conclusion of the SERVICES under this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall provide the AGENCY with a list of all information and materials it considers confidentia and/or proprietary in nature: (a) at the commencement of the term of this AGREEMENT; or (b) as soon as such confidential or proprietary material is developed. "Proprietary and/or confidential information" is not meant to include any information which, at the time of its disclosure: (i) is already known to the other party; (ii) is rightfully disclosed to one of the parties by a third parry that is not acting as an agent or representative for the other party; (iii) is independently developed by or for the other party; (iv) is publicly known; or (v) is generally utilized by unaffiliated third parties engaged in the same business or businesses as the CONSULTANT. The parties also acknowledge that the AGENCY is subject to Washington State and federal public disclosure laws. As such, the AGENCY shall maintain the confidentiality of all such information marked proprietary and/ or confidential or otherwise exempt, unless such disclosure is required under applicable state or federal law. If a public disclosure request is made to view materials identified as "Proprietary and/or confidential information" or otherwise exempt information, the AGENCY will notify the CONSULTANT of the request and of the date that sucl records will be released to the requester unless the CONSULTANT obtains a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that disclosure. If the CONSULTANT fails to obtain the court order enjoining disclosure, the AGENCY will release the requested information on the date specified. The CONSULTANT agrees to notify the sub -consultant of any AGENCY communication regarding disclosure that may include a sub -consultant's proprietary and/or confidential information. The CONSULTANT notification to the sub -consultant will include the date that such records will be released by the AGENCY to the requester and state that unless the sub -consultant obtains a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that disclosure the AGENCY will release the requested information. If the CONSULTANT and/or sub -consultant fail to obtain a court order or other judicial relief enjoining the AGENCY by the release date, the CONSULTANT shall waive and release and shall hold harmless and indemnify the AGENCY from all claims of actual or alleged damages, liabilities, or costs associated with the AGENCY's said disclosure of sub -consultants' information. XX. Records Maintenance During the progress of the Work and SERVICES provided hereunder and for a period of not less than six (6) years a from the date of final payment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall keep, retain and maintain all "documents" pertaining to the SERVICES provided pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Copies of all "documents" d pertaining to the SERVICES provided hereunder shall be made available for review at the CONSULTANT's place E of business during normal working hours. If any litigation, claim or audit is commenced, the CONSULTANT shall cooperate with AGENCY and assist in the production of all such documents. "Documents" shall be retained until Q all litigation, claims or audit findings have been resolved even though such litigation, claim or audit continues past the six (6) year retention period. m E For purposes of this AGREEMENT, "documents" means every writing or record of every type and description, 0 including electronically stored information ("ESI"), that is in the possession, control, or custody of the a CONSULTANT, including, without limitation, any and all correspondences, contracts, AGREEMENT `s, appraisals, plans, designs, data, surveys, maps, spreadsheets, memoranda, stenographic or handwritten notes, reports, records, telegrams, schedules, diaries, notebooks, logbooks, invoices, accounting records, work sheets, charts, notes, drafts, scribblings, recordings, visual displays, photographs, minutes of meetings, 2 Q Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 287 Revised 311112016 7.16.a tabulations, computations, summaries, inventories, and writings regarding conferences, conversations or telephone conversations, and any and all other taped, recorded, written, printed or typed matters of any kind or description; every copy of the foregoing whether or not the original is in the possession, custody, or control of the a, CONSULTANT, and every copy of any of the foregoing, whether or not such copy is a copy identical to an original y or whether or not such copy contains any commentary or notation whatsoever that does not appear on the original. o For purposes of this AGREEMENT, "ESI" means any and all computer data or electronic recorded media of any kind, including "Native Files", that are stored in any medium from which it can be retrieved and examined, either directly or after translation into a reasonably useable form. ESI may include information and/or documentation stored in various software programs such as: Email, Outlook, Word, Excel, Access, Publisher, PowerPoint, Adobe Acrobat, SQL databases, or any other software or electronic communication programs or databases that the CONSULTANT may use in the performance of its operations. ESI may be located on network servers, backup tapes, smart phones, thumb drives, CDs, DVDs, floppy disks, work computers, cell phones, laptops or any other electronic device that CONSULTANT uses in the performance of its Work or SERVICES hereunder, including any personal devices used by the CONSULTANT or any sub -consultant at home. "Native files" are a subset of ESI and refer to the electronic format of the application in which such ESI is normally created, viewed, and /or modified. The CONSULTANT shall include this section XX "Records Maintenance" in every subcontract it enters into in relation to this AGREEMENT and bind the sub -consultant to its terms, unless expressly agreed to otherwise in writing by the AGENCY prior to the execution of such subcontract. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year shown in the "Execution Date" box on page one (1) of this AGREEMENT. Signature Signature Date Date Any modification, change, or reformation of this AGREEMENTshall require approval as to form by the Office of the Attorney General. Agreement Number: Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Packet Pg. 288 Revised 311112016 7.16.a Exhibit A See attached Exhibit A. Scope of Wor) Project No. Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit Packet Pg. 289 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Construction Management Services for the Highway 99 Revitalization and Gateway Project (Stage 2) WSP USA Inc (Consultant) will provide Construction Management (CM) services to the City of Edmonds (CITY) for the Highway 99 Revitalization and Gateway Project (Stage 2). Services will be provided in accordance with the WSDOT LAG Manual. These services will include Project Management of the contract, Construction Management, Office Engineering, Public Communication, and Inspection services to oversee the final construction tasks and closeout of this project as detailed below. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project area is on Highway 99 between 244T" ST SW to 210TH ST SW. Project work performed by the CITY's selected contractor includes construction of a raised center median with hardscaping, landscaping, irrigation; the addition of drainage inlets and piping, curb ramps; pavement markings; signing; gateway signage, landscaping, and irrigation; a new pedestrian hybrid beacon (HAWK) signal approximately 600' north of 234th Street SW; and connection to the existing interconnect system. Consultant will provide Robert Hallowell to perform field observation and Christie Baklund for contract administration services unless the Project is delayed or suspended to the extent they must be assigned to a different project, in which case Consultant will provide staff of similar experience and skills. Consultant shall not assign another employee to perform field observation or contract administration services without prior written approval of the CITY. Consultant will submit a proposed personnel change to the CITY for review and approval if named staff are no longer available due to Project delay or suspension, or they leave employment with Consultant. Upon request by the CITY, Consultant will replace any personnel from Project team within one week of the CITY's submittal of a written request to remove an employee. Consultant shall furnish all services and labor necessary to complete the following tasks: Task 1— Project Management and Administration of the CM Agreement Provide overall project management, project oversight, coordination with the CITY, monthly progress reports, and invoicing. This effort specifically includes the following: A. Develop and follow reporting and invoicing procedures specific for the CM Services for this project, and review and adjust procedures as may be requested by the CITY. B. Manage Consultant Team (CM Team), comprised of Consultant's staff and subcontractor(s). Organize and layout work for CM Team C. Review Consultant's monthly expenditures and prepare and submit invoices and a monthly progress letter outlining major CM activities to the CITY. Format of monthly invoices and reports will be submitted to the CITY for review and approval prior to first invoice submittal. D. Prepare cost proposals and negotiate timely amendments of the CM contract if needed. No costs for preparing amendments included in this contract. E. Provide current WSDOT ICR approval letter for CM Team and prepare monthly invoices with ICR information clearly identified for each member of CM Team. Packet Pg. 290 7.16.a F. Review City and Contractor safety Plan for additional safety protocols for staff on site that are in addition to established plans. G. Comply with WSDOT's DMCS requirements for project. Consultant shall input monthly payment information into DMCS in accordance with the LAG Manual. Deliverables • Monthly Status Reports • Monthly Invoices • Contract Amendments if needed • WSDOT ICR Approval Letters Task 2 Pre -Construction Services Pre -construction services will be performed by the Office Engineer and Inspector. A. Review project plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) and the Contract Documents including addenda and agreements in preparation to perform the Contract Administration and Inspection services. B. Document pre-existing conditions, including photographs and/or videos. The photographs and/or videos shall be provided to the CITY for review prior to the start of construction. C. Set up project files, both electronic and hard copy, meeting WSDOT LAG Manual requirements. D. Set up review/approval process with CITY and Engineer of Record. E. Participate in the CITY led pre -construction meeting and take meeting notes. Deliverables • Pre -construction photos and video documentation • Initial Tracking Sheets • Pre -construction meeting notes in Draft form for City use and distribution Task 3 Construction Services Task 3.1 Contract Administration A. Monitoring of DMCS, prompt payment and DBE condition of award goal. B. Review Apprentice Utilization Plan and track monthly reports to verify Contractor is on track to meet the Apprentice Utilization Requirement. C. Check weekly payrolls for prime Contractor and subcontractors to ensure applicable prevailing wage rates and benefits are paid. Compare to employee interview reports to ensure Contractor field staff are being paid in accordance with the contract. D. Progress Meetings. a. Consultant will prepare draft weekly progress meeting agenda to be finalized by the CITY prior to the meeting and take meeting notes. Draft meeting notes will be provided to the CITY for review, finalization, and distribution to the attendees. The weekly meeting agenda will track outstanding and completed issues on a weekly basis in coordination with the CITY. b. The CITY will lead progress meetings. Consultant will review (within 5 working days) the Contractor's initial Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule against allowable working days, key utility coordination dates, procurement of long lead items and Project milestone dates. Consultant will also review the schedule sequencing and activity duration to check if they are reasonable. Any discrepancies, conflicts or Packet Pg. 291 7.16.a unreasonable work durations will be brought to the attention of the Contractor and the CITY. F. Consultant will review (within 5 working days) Contractor's monthly updates to the CPM Schedule and notify the CITY and Contractor of discrepancies, conflicts, or unreasonable work durations. G. Consultant will evaluate construction Contractor's Schedule of Values for lump sum items. Review the Contract Price allocations and verify that such allocations are made in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. H. In accordance with the WSDOT Construction Manual, Consultant will monitor Contractor and Subcontractor's employment documentation for adherence to contract requirements. Monitoring will include: a. Collecting, reviewing, and approving (or rejecting) Requests to Sublet, WSDOT Form 421- 012. b. Collecting Certified Payrolls and reviewing selected payrolls to verify that they meet contract wage requirements. Provide updates on missing payrolls at the weekly progress meeting through the Payroll Tracking Log. c. Collecting and reviewing L&I form Statements of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages. d. Collecting and reviewing L&I form Affidavits of Wages Paid. e. Collecting/filing City Edmonds Business Licenses for the Contractor and its subcontractors. The CITY will prepare construction Change Orders and Change Order Directives. Consultant will review Contractor price quotes, CITY prepared Change Orders and supporting documentation for Change Orders. Consultant will prepare independent cost estimates to evaluate Change Order pricing in accordance with the WSDOT LAG Manual. Consultant will maintain the change order log and files for WSDOT review and verify the following documents are in each file: a. Fully executed Change Order(s). b. CITY Written Authorization to Proceed with Change Order work or executed Change Order Directive(s). c. Change Order Pricing. d. Independent Cost Estimate. e. Force Account records (if needed). f. Schedule analysis for extra working days. J. Consultant will prepare and maintain, on a weekly interval, a potential Change Order list for unpaid, CITY -requested, or disputed work. The list will include the following: a. Dates for when work was completed. b. Description of work. c. Force account estimate of work. d. CITY Authorization date (if owner requested). K. Consultant will prepare and maintain a Submittals Log and maintain the Record of Materials (ROM) that will be provided to the Contractor at the weekly coordination meeting. Consultant shall actively track status of submittals based on information provided by the CITY. The CITY will assign review of submittals. L. Consultant will prepare the weekly statement of working days and provide the information at the weekly coordination meeting. M. Consultant will prepare and maintain, on a weekly interval, a Request for Information (RFI) log that will be provided at the weekly coordination meeting with the Contractor. Consultant shall actively track status of RFIs based on information provided by the CITY. N. Consultant will prepare and maintain, on a weekly interval, a material testing log that identifies date, location, test type, test result and test specification for all testing performed during Packet Pg. 292 7.16.a project. O. Consultant will prepare and maintain, on a weekly interval, a Force Account Log that tracks by number and date, all force account work performed by Contractor. P. Document Control. Maintain document filing and tracking systems, following CITY guidelines and meeting funding CITY requirements. Collect, organize, and prepare documentation on the Project. Q. Consultant shall provide SharePoint site or similar as already available in Consultant's company services for remote access to all files for the CITY. Deliverables • Weekly Meeting Agendas and Notes • Weekly Statement of Working Day— provided on the following Monday of each work week. • Weekly tracking logs for Submittals, RFls, material testing, force account payments, potential change orders, and certified payrolls • Memo of review of initial schedules and monthly update memos • Monthly summaries of Materials on Hand • Copy of ROM, monthly • Apprentice hour Tracking • Verify Certified Payroll & compare to Wage Rate Interviews Task 3.2 Field Inspector A. Observe the technical conduct of the construction, including providing day-to-day contact with the construction Contractor, CITY, utilities, and other stakeholders, and monitor for adherence to the Contract Documents. The Consultant's personnel will act in accordance with Section 1- 05.2 of the Standard Specifications. B. Observe material, workmanship, and construction areas for compliance with the Contract Documents and applicable codes and notify construction Contractor of noncompliance. Promptly notify the CITY of any non -conforming work observed during site visits. C. Prepare Inspector Daily Reports (IDRs) in compliance with CITY and WSDOT requirements. Consultant shall provide the CITY with completed IDRs by the following workday. The IDRs shall include, at a minimum, a description of the work performed by the Contractor and Subcontractors, approximate quantities of materials installed, log of Contractor equipment and staff, traffic control observations, weather condition, and any observed problems or construction issues. D. Maintain records of materials and quantities incorporated into the Project, including but not limited to all gravel, rock, concrete tickets and their respective Manufacturing Certificate of Compliance, and asphalt delivery tickets. Obtain Scaleman's Daily Reports or Scaleman's Certification from Asphalt batch plant. E. Prepare accurate field note records and supporting documents in accordance with CITY and WSDOT requirements. F. Monitor daily the Contractor's traffic control procedures and implementation of the approved traffic control plans and collect and file the Contractor's Daily Traffic Control Summary Report. G. Monitor the Contractor's temporary erosion and sediment control procedures and systems and promptly notify the Contractor and CITY if erosion or sediment problems are observed within the Project limits. Collect and file the Contractor's Weekly Erosion Control Report. H. Monitor the Contractor's compliance with all permits provided to Consultant by the CITY. I. Provide daily Project construction photos of traffic control set-up and work activities during construction. Photographs will be in digital format and cataloged by date and time. Packet Pg. 293 7.16.a J. Material testing coordination, as required under the ROM and WSDOT Construction Manual, with material testing Subconsultant. K. In accordance with the WSDOT Construction Manual, use WSDOT form 424-003 and conduct employee interviews and prepare Employee Interview Report for the Contractor and all Subcontractors. L. Review the Contractor's construction record drawings on a weekly interval in accordance with the Contract Provisions. Track and record field changes on drawings and use information to verify the Contractor's construction record drawings. M. Assist the CITY with establishing communications with adjacent property owners and coordinate response with CITY to questions from property owners and the public. N. Attend and participate in weekly construction meetings and/or regular on -site meetings. O. Punch list. Upon substantial completion of work, Consultant will contribute, and the CITY will coordinate with affected agencies to prepare a punch list of items to be completed or corrected. The CITY will coordinate final inspection with those agencies. Deliverables • IDRs with photos, delivered on the following workday • Field Note Records • Contractor Employee Interview Reports • Non -Conformance Reports • Employee Wage Rate Interviews • Force Account Documentation Task 4 Post -Construction Services (Close-out) Post construction field services will be performed by the Inspector. Post -construction office services will be performed by Inspector and Office Engineer. A. Comment on outstanding claims if needed. B. Coordinate final inspections and punch list activities. C. Obtain final documentation for project files including Affidavits of Wages Paid D. Prepare claims initiated by the CITY, including analysis and negotiations for a resolution E. Print project documentation and place into 3 ring binders in an order acceptable to the CITY F. Copy complete electronic files onto removable digital storage (USB flash drive) G. Perform Close-out activities and evaluation of project documentation for auditing purposes H. Review final Red -Line drawings from the contractor I. Draft Material Certification Checklist for City Engineer signature and submission J. Participate in one "lessons learned" meeting led by CITY Deliverables Draft Material Certification Checklist for City Engineer signature and submission Reviewed as -built (red line) drawings. • Construction documentation in digital and printed formats. Task 5 Material Testing Services Material testing services will be provided by HWA Geosciences Inc. A. Sampling and testing of mineral aggregates per WSDOT specifications based upon estimated Packet Pg. 294 7.16.a quantities B. Inspection and testing of compacted backfill for trenches, utilities, concrete subgrade, etc. C. Concrete inspection and testing for foundation, curb and gutter, hardscaping, and ADA curb ramps. Testing includes slump, air entrainment, and fabrication of compressive strength specimens. D. Sampling and testing HMA during paving for Rice density, extraction, and gradation. Assumes one sample for up to 1000 tons of HMA. E. Inspection and testing of HMA placement and compaction. F. QA Review, reporting, construction meetings, and submittal review. Deliverables • Inspection reports • Test results within 24 hours of field test Immediate verbal notification to CM Team and the CITY of a failed test report followed by field report via email within 24 hours of field test. Task 6 Community Outreach Support Community outreach support shall be provided to a limit as estimated in the budget. Services may include the following upon request of the CITY." A. Public Involvement and Communications Plan the Consultant may develop a public involvement and communications plan. The plan would include outreach goals and objectives, a detailed list of activities, outreach schedule, roles and responsibilities, a preliminary stakeholder list, and demographic information. This plan would be reviewed and approved by CITY staff. B. Communications Planning, Progress, and Strategy Meetings Up to (2) Consultant staff may attend monthly communications meetings with CITY staff. C. Preconstruction Meeting the Consultant may support one public preconstruction meeting(s). Each online public meeting may require: 1 notification (see NOTIFICATIONS below); meeting materials including translation into Spanish, Korean, Chinese, and Ukrainian; meeting planning and agendas; online meeting support, staffing with up to two (2) consultant staff, and facilitation; and meeting summary. As part of the preconstruction meeting, staff may distribute project fliers and check -in on businesses. Following the event, the Consultant may prepare a high-level summary including number of attendees, questions asked, and general comments. D. Community Drop -In Sessions the Consultant may plan and staff bi-monthly community drop -in sessions during the nine (9) months of construction. Each online public meeting may require: 1 notification (see Notifications below); meeting materials including translation into Spanish, Korean, Chinese, and Ukrainian; meeting planning and agendas; online meeting support, staffing, and facilitation; and meeting summary. As part of the drop -in sessions, staff may distribute project fliers and check -in on businesses. Following the event, the Consultant may prepare a high-level summary including number of attendees, questions asked, and general comments. E. Construction Meetings the Consultant may virtually attend monthly construction schedule meetings. F. Notifications Consultant may develop and distribute up to twelve (12) notifications based on construction activities, such as night work and major Movement of Traffic (MOT) (traffic control) changes, or milestones, such as groundbreaking and completion. Notification methods may include emails, flyers, social media, and phone calls. Each notification may include content Packet Pg. 295 7.16.a development (working with the construction team), site map and map updates, distribution, and translation into Spanish, Korean, Chinese, and Ukrainian. Each notification will be reviewed by the CITY prior to publication. G. In -Person Business and Stakeholder Outreach per milestone) Consultant can perform business and stakeholder outreach at project kickoff and at other milestones. Door-to-door notifications assume business and stakeholder contact list development, planning, and materials production. H. Monthly Project Email Updates the Consultant may prepare and send up to nine (9) email construction updates sent via the CITY listserv. Each email update may include content development for summary of work performed and lookahead (working with the construction team), site map and map updates, distribution, and translation into Spanish, Korean, Chinese, and Ukrainian. Each email will be reviewed by the CITY prior to publication. I. Monthly Project Flyer Updates per flyer) The Consultant may prepare and send up to nine (9) monthly flyer construction updates. Each flyer will be modified from the Monthly Project Email Update and formatted to fit the format. The flyer would not be original content. Flyers may be distributed throughout the project area. J. Project Website the consultant will manage project website and project email. K. Social Media the Consultant may create and monitor social media posts in conjunction with project emails, meetings, and notifications. Each post will be in English, Spanish, and Korean and will be reviewed by the CITY prior to posting. L. Database Management the Consultant may document all project -related communications and correspondence monthly for up to nine (9) months into database. M. Communications support The Consultant may provide day-to-day communications support as needed, including monitoring the project email inbox, developing responses to public questions, tracking project correspondence, coordinating with CITY staff, and liaising with residents, neighborhood associations, businesses, and other stakeholders as needed. Translation services of incoming emails and outgoing responses may be required. Up to two (2) staff shall attend monthly communication meetings with the City of Edmonds staff as needed or requested. N. 24-Hour Hotline the Consultant will be responsible receiving and summarizing all phone calls, including after-hours for nine (9) months if requested by the City. The 24-Hour Hotline will be in English. Translation services will be made available. O. Door -to -Door Notifications per milestone) Consultant may assist in performing door-to-door notifications in the Project Area at project kickoff and other milestones. Door-to-door notifications assume stakeholder contact list development, planning, and materials production. P. Online Surveys and Polls Consultant may create, distribute, and tabulate/analyze results for online surveys and polls via listserv, social media, or website. Q. Maps The CONSULTANT may develop one (1) corridor -wide map and make key modifications as work progresses. Maps will be used in notifications, social media posts, and on the website. ASSUMPTIONS 1. Budget A. Staffing levels are anticipated in accordance with the attached Exhibit D for the duration of the 150 working day contract. The budget total assumes the following personnel are assigned to the Project: a. One full-time Inspector and a not to exceed budget for on -call inspection services. b. One 3/4-time Office Engineer (OE) c. Project Manager (PM) and Project Accountant (PA) Packet Pg. 296 7.16.a d. Public Communications Team B. Consultant will work to the limitations of the authorized budget. If additional budget is needed to complete work under this Scope due to scope changes, the CITY and Consultant will negotiate a supplement to this Agreement. Issues may include but not be limited to: a. The contractor's schedule requires additional inspection coverage, and/or inspection coverage of extra crews and shifts. b. Services needed beyond the budgeted hours. c. More than 15 non -working days credited to the contractor when inspection work was still necessary. For example, rain days that impact critical path, but contractor is still working. d. Any added scope tasks. e. More than 150 hours of Overtime for Inspector. C. The budget allocations shown in Exhibit D are itemized to aid in Project tracking purposes only. The budget may be transferred between people, or between labor and expenses, provided the total contracted amount is not exceeded without prior authorization. D. Consultant shall coordinate with the CITY to allocate staff accordingly to cover contractor work hours. E. Consultant will provide iPads with the construction management software "Headlight" for field staff to record daily activities and uploading information to a common web -based storage system. The system will be accessible to the CITY, WSDOT and other identified stakeholders to review field staff's observations in real time upon request. F. Consultant will utilize PlanGrid to maintain plan notes for FNRs and as -built notes. G. Unless previously stated, the budget assumes WSDOT standard forms, logs, and processes will be used on the Consultant Project SharePoint site. H. Consultant shall provide virtual meeting services and coordinate the same I. For purposes of estimation, Consultant assumes no more than five (5) contractor generated change orders and no more than two (2) City initiated change orders. Standard hours per change order are assumed to be 4 hours. 2. Items and Services the CITY will provide A. Meeting facilities for project meetings B. Access for the OE to the DCMS system. C. Retain Engineer of Record for shop drawing review, RFIs, design changes, and final record drawings. D. Coordination with and enforcement of utility franchise agreements and/or contracts and schedules for services related to this Project. E. Verify that the required permits, bonds, and insurance have been obtained and submitted by the construction contractor. Obtain all permits not required to be provided by construction contractor and provide copy of same to consultant. F. Construction Survey. Provide project control survey and staking that is not already assigned to the construction contractor. G. If necessary, geotechnical and/or environmental support for unsuitable and/or contaminated soils. H. Materials Record of Materials (ROM) from WSDOT and any design related testing reports. I. Access to Public Works Building or sanitation facilities and intermittent weather protection as needed and coordinate with the City Project Manager. Packet Pg. 297 7.16.a 3. Assumptions related to purposes of Communications services as they relate to selected services: 1. City of Edmonds will manage media relations. 2. City of Edmonds will lead translations and Title 6 reporting. CONSULTANT will provide Spanish and Korean live translation options for the 24- hour Hotline. • City of Edmonds will translate all print materials into Spanish and Korean. 3. City of Edmonds staff will provide current stakeholder lists and contact information as available 4. Consultant will develop resident, business, and stakeholder lists that the City does not have. Consultant will manage all preparations for and staff online preconstruction and other online public meetings, including drop -in sessions. 5. City of Edmonds will schedule and manage venue for in -person meetings. 6. City of Edmonds staff will review all materials prior to publication. 7. City of Edmonds staff will review all deliverables. ADDITIONAL SERVICES When requested by the CITY, the Consultant shall provide additional services that may increase the level of effort described in this document. Authorization to perform additional services will be in the form of a mutually negotiated Supplement to this Agreement, specifying the work to be performed, and basis of payment. Packet Pg. 298 7.16.a Exhibit B DBE Participatiot Our subconsultant is a S/DBE, but there is no mandatory S/DBE participation. Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit B Packet Pg. 299 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit C Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and Other Dati IM In this Exhibit the agency, as applicable, is to provide a description of the format and standards the consultant is to use in preparing electronic files for transmission to the agency. The format and standards to be provided may include, but are not limited to, the following: I. Surveying, Roadway Design & Plans Preparation Section A. Survey Data See Exhibit A. B. Roadway Design Files Civil 3D. version to be determined by City of Edmonds based on current version used at the time the work is completed. C. Computer Aided Drafting Files AutoCAD. Version to be determined by City of Edmonds based on current version used at the time the work is completed. Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Packet Pg. 300 Revised 1013012014 D. Specify the Agency's Right to Review Product with the Consultant 7.16.a See Exhibit A. E. Specify the Electronic Deliverables to Be Provided to the Agency See Exhibit A. F. Specify What Agency Furnished Services and Information Is to Be Provided See Exhibit A. Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Packet Pg. 301 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a IL Any Other Electronic Files to Be Provided See Exhibit A. III. Methods to Electronically Exchange Data Methods will be determined in consultation with agency during the course of the work. WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Packet Pg. 302 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a A. Agency Software Suite None. B. Electronic Messaging System None. C. File Transfers Format See attached Exhibit A. WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Packet Pg. 303 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit D Exhibit D - Consultant Fee Determination Exhibit D - Consultant ICR Prime Consultant Cost Computation! Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit D Packet Pg. 304 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a EXHIBIT D - CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION Edmonds Hwy 99 Fee Est. EDMONDS HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION CM 5/12/2022 DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC) Personnel Hours Rate Cost 1 Officer 0 X $ 132.22 = $ - 2 Sr. Project Managers & PM's 176 X $ 90.46 = $ 15,921 GSO 3 Construction Mgt. 1,722 X $ 64.44 = $ 110,971 Field 4 Scheduling 42 X $ 59.58 = $ 2,502 GSO 5 Inspector 480 X $ 67.96 = $ 32,621 Field 6 Community Outreach 540 X $ 51.36 = $ 27,733 GSO 7 Construction Office Asst. 1,140 X $ 65.69 = $ 74,884 GSO 8 Project Accountant 44 X $ 45.19 = $ 1,988 GSO Total GSO Hours 1,942 Direct Salary Costs (DSC) = $ 123,029 Tota Field Hours 2,202 Direct Salary Costs (DSC) = $ 143,592 Salary Escalation: 0% of DSC = $ - Subtotal (DSC + SE) = $ 266,621 GSO Overhead 130.75% of (DSC + SE) = $ 160,861 Field Overhead 96.36% of (DSC + SE) = $ 138,365 Fixed Fee (FF) 30.00% of (DSC + SE) = $ 79,986 SUBTOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) = $ 507,469 TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) = $ 507,469 w N TOTAL WSP = $ 507,469 s3f Q Estimated DIRECT EXPENSES Rate Quantity Expense Mileage - flyer distribution, in -person meetings, in -person drop -ins, in - person outreach 0.585 1000 $ 585.00 0 In -person meeting materials 600 2 $ 1,200.00 V In-prson stakeholder/business >% v meetings materials/brochures/cards 200 3 $ 600.00 24-hour hotline, incl. translation and activation fee 100 9 $ 900.00 Q Mailhouse for 7,078 mailpieces 1415.6 3 $ 4,246.80 Flyer printing 100 pieces 300 9 $ 2,700.00 0 Printing and reprographics 1 750 $ 750.00 J Headlight (2 users x 9 months) 18 200 $ 3,600.00 N G PlanGrid (2 users x 9 months) 18 35 $ 630.00 L_ Q Mileage 0.585 16000 $ 9,360.00 Q Printing and reprographics 1 500 $ 500.00 �- Other 1 1000 $ 1,000.00 d d TOTAL Direct Expenses = $ 25,487 Q SUBCONSULTANTS C HWA GeoSciences $ 73,622 N E t TOTAL Subconsultants = $ 73,622 v ca Q Management Reserve = $ 30,000 r c TOTAL FEE = $ 636,578 d t v R .r r a Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 305 EXHIBIT D - CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION EDMONDS HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION CM 7.16.a -a O .0 C C C V` C C t V y `m o rn r E m E y Q d c V 7 Subtas r a R 2 o w o= o ° Task k O u`� 2 IL U 2 n m 5 U O U O c0i a Q Totals DSC $ 123.09 $ 70.55 $ 72.00 $ 75.99 $ 51.00 $ 58.96 $ 36.88 $ 45.18 TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1 176 44 220 Project Management 176 44 220 TASK 2 - PRECONSTRUCTON SERVICES 2 80 80 160 80 80 160 TASK 3 - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3 1,350 42 480 900 2,772 1,200 42 480 900 2,622 Estimated Overtime for CM 150 150 TASK 4 - POST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 4 256 160 416 256 160 416 TASK 5 - MATERIAL TEST SERVICES 5 36 36 36 36 TASK 6 - COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUPPORT 6 540 540 540 540 TOTAL - 176 1,722 42 480 540 1,140 44 4,144 3 r a Packet Pg. 306 7.16.a AdElk Washington State w, Department of Transportation August 4, 2021 WSP USA, Inc. 250 West 34th Street New York, NY 10119 Subject: Acceptance FYE 2020 ICR — CPA Report Dear Christopher Kidd: Development Division Contract Services Office PO Box 47408 Olympia, WA 98504-7408 7345 Linderson Way SW Tumwater, WA 98501-6504 TTY:1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov We have accepted your firms FYE 2020 Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) based on the "Independent CPA Report," prepared by Deloitte & Touche, LLP as follows: • General Services Office: 130.75% of direct labor (rate includes 0.24% Facilities Capital Cost of Money) • Base Field: 93.36% of direct labor (rate includes 0.14% Facilities Capital Cost of Money) This rate will be applicable for WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual basis. Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract. This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with the firm is responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR. If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email consultantrates(a,wsdot.wa.gov. Regards; Aug 4, 2021 ERIK K. JONSON Contract Services Manager EKJ:mya Packet Pg. 307 7.16.a Exhibit E Sub -consultant Cost Computation! There isn't any sub -consultant participation at this time. The CONSULTANT shall not sub -contract for the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior written permission of the AGENCY Refer to section VI "Sub -Contracting" of this AGREEMENT. Exhibit E - Subconsultant Fee Determination Exhibit E - Subconsultant ICR Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit E Packet Pg. 308 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a EXHIBIT E - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION HWA Fee Estimate EDMONDS HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION CM 5/12/2022 DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC) Personnel Hours Rate Cost 1 Principal 0 X $ 90.18 = $ - 2 Project Manager 16 X $ 86.76 = $ 1,388 3 Geologist VI 9 X $ 53.75 = $ 484 4 Geologist III 180 X $ 40.83 = $ 7,349 5 Geologist III 296 X $ 37.42 = $ 11,076 6 Clerical 0 X $ 32.32 = $ - Total Hours 501 Direct Salary Costs (DSC) = $ 20,300 Salary Escalation: 0% of DSC = $ - Subtotal (DSC + SE) = $ 20,300 Overhead (OH) 163.90% of (DSC + SE) = $ 33,272 Fixed Fee (FF) 30.00% of (DSC + SE) = $ 6,090 SUBTOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) = $ 59,662 TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) = $ 59,662 EXPENSES Acceptance testing for CSBC (GS, SE, Fracture), assume 2 sources Acceptance testing for gravel borrow (GS, SE), assume 2 sources Proctor tests on all materials to be compacted Bitumen content by extraction with gradation of aggregate (1 mix desigi Maximum theoretical specific gravity of HMA (rice density, 1 mix design HMA oven correction factor (3 burns) Concrete aggregate acceptance testing (assume 2 sources x 2 mixes x 2 aggregates) Concrete compressive strenth tests (45 sets of four cylinders) Mileage to job site IRS rate (0.585/mile), assume 120 trips to site Mileage for sampling aggregates/HMA at sources Nuclear gauge rental: 30 days @ $40/day Thin lift (HMA) nuclear gauge rental: 5 days @ $60/day TOTAL HWA = $ 59,662 Est. No. Unit Test Tests Cost Total Cost 2 $ 345.00 $ 690.00 2 $ 285.00 $ 570.00 4 $ 275.00 $ 1,100.00 3 $ 185.00 $ 555.00 3 $ 140.00 $ 420.00 3 $ 140.00 $ 420.00 8 $ 185.00 $ 1,480.00 180 $ 30.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 300.00 TOTAL EXPENSES = $ 13,960 TOTAL FEE $ 73,622 r a Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 309 EXHIBIT E - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION EDMONDS HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION CM 7.16.a ld C v Ct d R O O O v O C O O W O CD 0. 0.2 (7 (7 0 U Totals Work Task Description $ 90.18 $ 86.76 $ 53.75 $ 40.83 $ 37.42 $ 32.32 Aggregate/Soils Inspection and Testing Preconstruction Meeting (Prior to job start) 1 1 Aggregate Acceptance Sampling at Pits (2 materials sampled from two initial sources) 6 6 Utility trench backfil (four 6-hour visits) 24 24 Night work in W SDPT exclusion zone (three nights of catch basin installation/trench backfill) 24 24 Water service crossing backfill (10 4-hour visits) 40 40 Subgrade inspecting for garden wall (one 4-hour visit) 4 4 Backliill for garden wall (two 6-hour visits) 12 12 Sidewalk, curb/gutter, etc., base materials (10 4-hur visits) 40 40 Concrete/Pervious Concrete Testing and Inspection Concrete Aggregate Acceptance Sampling (assume 2 sources) 6 6 ADA ramps (10 pours, plus next -day cylinder pickup) 40 20 60 Traffic island (4 pours, plus next -day cylinder pickup) 16 8 24 Foundations for Corten steel (4 pours, plus next -day cylinder pickup) 16 8 24 Curb and gutter (20 pours, plus next -day cylinder pickup) 80 40 120 Garden wall (2 pours, plus next -day cylinder pickup) 8 4 12 Hardscaping (3 periodic pours, plus next -day cylinder pickup) 12 6 18 Sidewalk (2 periodic pours, plus next -day cylinder pickup) 8 4 12 Hot Mix Asphalt Testing and Inspection HMA sampling at batch plant (2 samples) 6 6 Night paving for st9ormwater trenches (assume all paves in one night) 8 8 Inspection and testing during HMA overlay placement (4 full-time visits) 36 36 Project Management QA review, reporting, submittal reviews, and report distribution 16 8 24 TOTAL - 16 9 180 296 501 O IM M M N M N M 3 d 0 M 3 Z Im O a t r+ 3 -W a Packet Pg. 310 7.16.a AdElk Washington State w, Department of Transportation September 9, 2021 HWA GeoSciences, Inc. 21312 301h Drive SE, Suite 110 Bothell, WA 98021 Subject: Acceptance FYE 2020 ICR — CPA Report Dear Vasiliy Babko: Development Division Contract Services Office PO Box 47408 Olympia, WA 98504-7408 7345 Linderson Way SW Tumwater, WA 98501-6504 TTY:1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov We have accepted your firms FYE 2020 Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) of 163.90% of direct labor (rate includes 0.22% Facilities Capital Cost of Money) based on the "Independent CPA Report," prepared by Thomas W. Maxwell, CPA. This rate will be applicable for WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual basis. Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract. This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with the firm is responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR. If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email consultantratesAwsdot.wa.gov. Regards; ERIK K. JONSON Contract Services Manager EKJ:ah Packet Pg. 311 7.16.a Exhibit F Title Vl Assurance: During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to non- discrimination in federally assisted programs of the AGENCY, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the "REGULATIONS"), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT. 2. Non-discrimination: The CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed during this AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of sub -consultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The CONSULTANT shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the REGULATIONS, including employment practices when this AGREEMENT covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the REGULATIONS. 3. Solicitations for Sub -consultants, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed under a sub -contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub - consultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's obligations under this AGREEMENT and the REGULATIONS relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin. 4. Information and Reports: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the REGULATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the AGENCY, the STATE, or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such REGULATIONS, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the CONSULTANT shall so certify to the AGENCY, the STATE, or the FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Non-compliance: In the event of the CONSULTANT's non-compliance with the non- discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT sanctions a as it, the STATE, or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: a • Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT complies, and/or; • Cancellation, termination, or suspension of this AGREEMENT, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through L Q (5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the REGULATIONS, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The CONSULTANT shall take such action with m respect to any sub -consultant or procurement as the STATE, the AGENCY, or FHWA may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance. a Provided, however, that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with, c litigation with a sub -consultant or supplier as a result of such direction, the CONSULTANT may request the AGENCY enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the STATE and/or the AGENCY and, in addition, the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests Q of the United States. Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit F Packet Pg. 312 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit G Certification Document: Exhibit G-1(a) Certification of Consultant Exhibit G-1(b) Certification of Exhibit G-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions Exhibit G-3 Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying Exhibit G-4 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Packet Pg. 313 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit G-1(a) Certification of Consultant I hereby certify that I am the and duly authorized representative of the firm of whose address is and that neither the above firm nor I have: a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT; b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT; or c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out this AGREEMENT; except as hereby expressly stated (if any); I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation in connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. WSP USA Inc. Consultant (Firm Name) Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Packet Pg. 314 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit G-1(b) Certification of CITY OF EDMONDS I hereby certify that I am the: El ❑ Other of the , and or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to: a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ to retain, any firm or person; or b) Pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind; except as hereby expressly stated (if any): I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. Signature Date Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Packet Pg. 315 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit G-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions I. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; B. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgmer rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State anti-trust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and D. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this application / proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State and local) terminated for cause or default. II. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. WSP USA Inc. Consultant (Firm Name) Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Packet Pg. 316 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit G-3 Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan the entering into of any cooperative AGREEMENT, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative AGREEMENT. 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative AGREEMENT, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000.00, and not more than $100,000.00, for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier sub -contracts, which exceed $100,000, and that all such sub -recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. WSP USA Inc. Consultant (Firm Name) Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Packet Pg. 317 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit G-4 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403-4) submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the Contracting Officer or to the Contracting Officer's representative in support of Highway 99 CM Project * are accurate, complete, and current as of 5/11/2022 **. This certification includes the cost or pricing data supporting any advance AGREEMENT's and forward pricing rate AGREEMENT's between the offer or and the Government that are part of the proposal. Firm: Signature Date of Execution***: Title *Identify the proposal, quotation, request for pricing adjustment, or other submission involved, giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g. project title. **Insert the day, month, and year, when price negotiations were concluded and price AGREEMENT was reached. ***Insert the day, month, and year, of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to. Q Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Packet Pg. 318 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit H Liability Insurance Increas( To Be Used Only If Insurance Requirements Are Increased The professional liability limit of the CONSULTANT to the AGENCY identified in Section XII, Legal Relations and Insurance of this Agreement is amended to $ N/A The CONSULTANT shall provide Professional Liability insurance with minimum per occurrence limits in the amount of $ N/A Such insurance coverage shall be evidenced by one of the following methods: • Certificate of Insurance. • Self-insurance through an irrevocable Letter of Credit from a qualified financial institution. Self-insurance through documentation of a separate fund established exclusively for the payment of professional liability claims, including claim amounts already reserved against the fund, safeguards established for payment from the fund, a copy of the latest annual financial statements, and disclosure of the investment portfolio for those funds. Should the minimum Professional Liability insurance limit required by the AGENCY as specified above exceed $1 million per occurrence or the value of the contract, whichever is greater, then justification shall be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for approval to increase the minimum insurance limit. If FHWA approval is obtained, the AGENCY may, at its own cost, reimburse the CONSULTANT for the additional professional liability insurance required. Notes: Cost of added insurance requirements: $ N/A • Include all costs, fee increase, premiums. • This cost shall not be billed against an FHWA funded project. • For final contracts, include this exhibit. Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit H Packet Pg. 319 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit I Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedure: The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant's alleged design error is of a nature that exceeds the accepted standard of care. In addition, it will establish a uniform method for the resolution and/or cost recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some material damage due to the alleged error by the consultant. Step 1 Potential Consultant Design Error(s) is Identified by Agency's Project Manager At the first indication of potential consultant design error(s), the first step in the process is for the Agency's project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the potential design error(s). For federally funded projects, the Region Local Programs Engineer should be informed and involved in these procedures. (Note: The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer may appoint an agency staff person other than the project manager, who has not been as directly involved in the project, to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.) Step 2 Project Manager Documents the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s) After discussion of the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged error(s), and with the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence, the project manager obtains more detailed documentation than is normally required on the project. Examples include: all decisions and descriptions of work; photographs, records of labor, materials and equipment. Step 3 Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s) If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further, the next step in the process is for the project manager to contact the consultant regarding the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged error(s). The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the consultant should be represented by their project manager and any personnel (including sub -consultants) deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s) issue. Step 4 Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant After the meeting(s) with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design error(s), there are three possible scenarios: • It is determined via mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s). If this is the case, then the process will not proceed beyond this point. • It is determined via mutual agreement that a consultant design error(s) occurred. If this is the case, a then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, or their representatives, negotiate a settlement a with the consultant. The settlement would be paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced from the consultant's agreement with the agency for the services on the project in which the design error took place. The agency is to provide LP, through the Region Local Programs Engineer, a summary L of the settlement for review and to make adjustments, if any, as to how the settlement affects federal Q reimbursements. No further action is required. T • There is not a mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The consultant may request that the alleged design error(s) issue be forwarded to the Director of Public Works or Agency E Engineer for review. If the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, after review with their legal counsel, is not able to reach mutual agreement with the consultant, proceed to Step 5. a c d E Q Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I Packet Pg. 320 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Step 5 Forward Documents to Local Programs For federally funded projects all available information, including costs, should be forwarded through the Region Local Programs Engineer to LP for their review and consultation with the FHWA. LP will meet a, with representatives of the agency and the consultant to review the alleged design error(s), and attempt in to find a resolution to the issue. If necessary, LP will request assistance from the Attorney General's Office c for legal interpretation. LP will also identify how the alleged error(s) affects eligibility of project costs M for federal reimbursement. M • If mutual agreement is reached, the agency and consultant adjust the scope of work and costs to reflect the agreed upon resolution. LP, in consultation with FHWA, will identify the amount of federal participation in the agreed upon resolution of the issue. 3 as • If mutual agreement is not reached, the agency and consultant may seek settlement by arbitration M or by litigation. a; Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I Packet Pg. 321 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Exhibit J Consultant Claim Procedure! The purpose of this exhibit is to describe a procedure regarding claim(s) on a consultant agreement. The following procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than $1,000. If the consultant's claim(s) are a total of $1,000 or less, it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps. It is suggested that the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s) that total $1,000 or less. This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential claim by the consultant. Step 1 Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside of the agreement's scope of work, they may be entitled to a claim. The first step that must be completed is the request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager. The consultant's claim must outline the following: • Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim; • Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work; • Timeframe of the additional work that was outside of the project scope; • Summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated with the additional work; and • Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the agreement scope of work. Step 2 Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation After the consultant has completed step 1, the next step in the process is to forward the request to the Agency's project manager. The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine if the Agency agrees with the claim. If the FHWA is participating in the project's funding, forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the Agency's recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Local Programs through the Region Local Programs Engineer. If the claim is not eligible for federal participation, payment will need to be from agency funds. If the Agency project manager, Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, WSDOT Local Programs (if applicable), and FHWA (if applicable) agree with the consultant's claim, send a request memo, including backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement, or create a new agreement for the claim. After the request has been approved, the Agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit. No further action in needed regarding the claim procedures. If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, proceed to step 3 of the procedures. Q Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J Packet Pg. 322 Revised 1013012014 7.16.a Step 3 Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s) If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, the project manager shall prepare a summary for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following: • Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim; • Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firm that should be included in the claim; • Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work; • Agency's summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated with the additional work; • Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does/does not agree with the consultant's claim(s); • Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s); and • Recommendations to resolve the claim. Step 4 Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Reviews Consultant Claim and Agency Documentation The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or disapprove the claim, or portions thereof, which may include getting Agency Council or Commission approval (as appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures). If the project involves federal participation, obtain concurrence from WSDOT Local Programs and FHWA regarding final settlement of the claim. If the claim is not eligible for federal participation, payment will need to be from agency funds. Step 5 Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify (in writing) the consultant of their final decision regarding the consultant's claim(s). Include the final dollar amount of the accepted claim(s) and rationale utilized for the decision. Step 6 Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claim(s) The agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit. Agreement Number: WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J Packet Pg. 323 Revised 1013012014 7.17 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Written Public Comments Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Public comments submitted to email address publiccomments@edmondswa.gov and the web form for public comments<https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment> between April 28 and May 11, 2022. Attachments: Public Comment for Council May 17 2022 Packet Pg. 324 7.17.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 5/17/2022 Submitted on: 5/2/2022 3:27:48 PM Name: Dana Peregrine City of Residence: Tacoma Agenda Topic: Camping Ban if shelter refused Public Comment: Dear Edmonds City Council Members, Even if the proposed ordinance that will transport people out of Edmonds for housing isn't intended to be used often, the fact Edmonds feels it is E E a viable tool says a lot about Edmonds' values. It says to me Edmonds only accepts residents and o U citizens who fit certain criteria. It sounds to me like those few with the greatest need get kicked out of 2 Edmonds for another community to deal with. It's time Edmonds steps up as a city and provides shelter and services for its homeless. Edmonds nor any city is immune to homelessness. Homelessness will only go away when all ban together to serve, including City government. Do your part! Provide safe places to sleep for ALL your residents and citizens! Respectfully, Dana Peregrine Submitted on: 5/2/2022 4:42:41 PM Name: Rita Koenigs City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Criminalizing Unhoused People Public Comment: Hello. I currently reside in Edmonds. I would like to urge you to not criminalize our unhoused neighbors, and to argue that it is not acceptable to place them far from an environment that they are familiar with. Thank you. Rita Koenigs Submitted on: 5/2/2022 10:55:13 PM Name: Joe Wack City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Chapter 5.70 Public Comment: To Edmonds City Council: My name is Joe Wack and I live in the Lake Ballinger neighborhood of Edmonds. I am an elementary school teacher and I have had many students through the years whose families were experiencing homelessness. None of those students would have been better off if a member of their family had been thrown in jail for refusing the exact housing offered by a police officer. My students have sometimes struggled to get to school regularly. This is made worse when the housing they can get is further away from their school. When the only housing they can get is further away from their school, their absence rate goes up; their tardy rate goes up; they fall farther Packet Pg. 325 7.17.a behind and struggle more when they are in school. Chapter 5.70, entitled "Unlawful Occupation of Public Property," will not make easier the lives of people experiencing homelessness. But it's not for them. It's so that property owners made nervous by having to look at homelessness can feel better. Vote this proposal down. Thank you, Joe Wack From: Pam Brisse Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 10:16 AM To: Council; Public Comment (Council) Subject: I oppose adding "Unlawful Occupation of Public Property" to city code. a� E E Dear City Council, U I would like to register my opposition to this cruel and inhumane proposal that would criminalize poverty. Voting yes to this would show your disregard for the problem - to try to ship unhoused people away from Edmonds to make them someone else's problem, to separate them from their loved ones or pets, to send them into a situation that may be more unsafe for them than they currently are, to separate them from what support systems they do have, not to mention jailing N the homeless costs more than housing the homeless. We can do better and we should. o Please vote no. Pam Brisse Edmonds Resident Submitted on: 5/3/2022 6:58:52 PM Name: Scott Marshall City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Against draft ordinance to arrest unhoused Public Comment: This ordinance to arrest and fine the most vulnerable members of our community is worse than barbaric. This is nothing less than a proposal to bring back debters prison. I look forward to canvassing for the opponents of any councilmembers who support this ordinance. Submitted on: 5/4/2022 6:08:52 AM Name: Tracy Tallman City of Residence: Edmonds Packet Pg. 326 7.17.a Agenda Topic: Criminalizing homelessness Public Comment: Please do not approve this measure. Frankly, I'm horrified that you are even considering it so strenuously. Somehow, all the other communities in our area are managing homelessness without passing such archaic laws. It is embarrassing that Edmonds is in the news for all the wrong reasons. Submitted on: 5/4/2022 2:01:04 PM Name: John McKinney City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Overnight Camping Ordinance Public Comment: I oppose this ordinance. We should not be engaging in hasty policy as a reaction to one publicized example. Listen to experts, come up with a real plan. This ordinance does not address the problem. A compassionate solution could be designed with a bit more effort, and it would be well worth it. For instance, we could host something like a community Design Storm (an invention of Surya Vanka) with experts, creatives, some research or even some of the homeless themselves, there, telling their situation and answering questions, helping those solution architects understand what they are trying to solve. Just one idea, most importantly, I think we all know we could find a better solution. A better solution will have much greater community support. Submitted on: 5/4/2022 7:03:36 PM Name: Anne Nylander City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: No camping ban Public Comment: I would like to register my opposition to the proposed no camping ban. Not only is it inhumane, it also does not demonstrate any proactive effort to directly mitigate the underlying causes of the problem. Without effective and adequate social supports, the problem will continue. Please continue to seek solutions that prevent, deter, and alleviate any person's need to sleep outside, and avoid punishing the most vulnerable members of our community. Submitted on: 5/6/2022 9:53:48 AM Name: Rick Carter City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Ordinance a� E E 0 U v 0 IL c m r. Packet Pg. 327 7.17.a Public Comment: I observed the city council meeting last night. I applaud the chairperson and yet was appalled by a few council members who stalled the vote to make the right decision. The interim police chief and the HR director want to move forward. Helping the homeless is finding them help and not allowing them to camp in our parks and public spaces. Do NOT follow Seattle! I beg you to pass this ordinance immediately. Thank you Vivian Olsen for your leadership. Do not stall. Thanks, Rick Submitted on: 5/6/2022 10:16:03 AM Name: Kathe Matrone City of Residence: EDMONDS Agenda Topic: Proposed Camping Ban v Public Comment: I fully support offering individuals who are homeless assistance in finding transitional housing. If their choice is to refuse assistance, they should not be enabled by allowing them to camp or a sleep in public places. L Submitted on: 5/6/2022 12:45:55 PM N Name: Jim Penhollow City of Residence: 71 Pine st. 303 Agenda Topic: Camping in Edmonds Public Comment: I do not understand why we would question camping made legal in Edmonds. It should not take much common sense to see what the ramifications are when you would invite homelessness to your community. Why would we burden our community and our law enforcement officers to deal with homelessness. If the Lynnwood YMCA wants to encourage Edmonds to have encampments then I suggest the 99 corridor. Lynnwood law enforcement has a larger budget. I think there will be very strong activism against those who want to change Edmonds !! Packet Pg. 328 7.18 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with HKA Global, Inc for the Carbon Recovery Project Staff Lead: Pamela Randolph Department: Public Works & Utilities Preparer: Rob English Background/History In early March, HKA Global was brought onto the Edmonds Team to assist the WWTP Manager in negotiating contract disagreements between Ameresco and Department of Enterprise Services (DES). HKA's initial contract was established March 1, 2022 for $55,000. Administration of the construction contract between Washington DES and the contractor (Ameresco) has been challenging due to the contracting method, complexity of the project and DES personnel not having experience in wastewater treatment plants. HKA Global has the skill and ability to assist in the ongoing negotiations and reconciliation of project costs. They are experts in resolving disputes by following the contract language, which in this case is key. We have already seen success with this approach and believe that having HKA continue their work with the Edmonds team is a critical step to contain project cost. Staff are requesting that HKA Global Supplemental Agreement for $89,175 be approved. On May 10, 2022, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was placed on the May 17, 2022 consent agenda for City Council approval. Staff Recommendation Approve Supplemental Agreement. Narrative The Carbon Recovery Project has been impacted by the pandemic which has strained our relationship with Ameresco and DES. Supply chain impacts, increased costs of materials and labor are consuming funds (contingency) which we had envisioned would be available for additional work. In addition, the delays have translated into additional cost to the City for hauling and disposal of solids. Currently there is a list of work that Ameresco believes is not in the base scope. The City contends that it is. In December 2021 DES Supervision and Claims Specialist began to meet with the team to help resolve the disagreements. This approach has been a slow process and produced limited results. In March of 2022, HKA was brought onto the Edmonds Team to assist the WWTP Manager in the resolution of the claims that Ameresco has made. Packet Pg. 329 7.18 HKA has the skill and ability to assist in the ongoing negotiations and reconciliation of project costs. They are experts in resolving disputes by following the contract language, which in this case is key. The original HKA contract amount of $55,000 and the Supplemental Agreement for $89,175 will be managed under the Carbon Recovery Project and subject to the % of ownership. The total expense is for $144,175 and will be shared with our Treatment Plant Partners. City of Shoreline $13,679 City of Mountlake Terrace $33,411 Olympic View Water District $23,862 City of Edmonds $73,223 Attachments: Attachment 1 - HKA Supplemental Agreement Packet Pg. 330 7.18.a Al CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON MAYOR 121 5T" AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-672-5750 i Website: www.edmondswa.gov Id'yo iqa� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery Project WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and HKA Global, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", entered into an underlying agreement for consulting services with respect to WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery Project, dated March 8, 2022; and WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified with regard to construction engineering services; NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of March 8, 2022 incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is further amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement, as amended by Supplemental Agreement No. 1 and 2, shall be further amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $55,000 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $89,175 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $144,175 ($55,000 plus $89,175). 1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying agreement, as amended by Supplemental Agreement No. 1 and 2, consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby further amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B to this Supplemental Agreement No. 3, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 2. In all other respects, the underlying agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth in Supplemental Agreement No. 1 but only as set forth therein. Packet Pg. 331 7.18.a DONE this day of , 20 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSULTANT By: By: _ Michael Nelson, Mayor Title: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Packet Pg. 332 7.18.a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: \\edmsvr-userfs\userprof$\erodarte\Documents\HKASuppI-WWTPPhase 6Carbon Recovery.docx Packet Pg. 333 7.18.a 0016rArmil Agreement for Professional Services EXHIBIT A Scope of Services: HKA shall provide the scope of services outlined below: A. Scope: 1. Provide continued consulting services to City of Edmonds Public Works related to the construction of the WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery Project. Services may include analysis of claims and disputed extra work, review of change order requests, time extension requests, review of entitlement, on -call CM Support, and other services as requested. B. Budget Estimate: HKA shall provide the services outlined in Section A based on the hourly rates for professional services included in the project fee schedule below: Task Budget Cost Estimate On -Call CM through July 2022 13 Weeks (15 hrs/week) @ $325/hr $63,375 COR / Claim Review through July 2022 40 hrs @ 395/hr $15,800 Management Reserve $10,000 Total $89,175 WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery PROJECT FEE SCHEDULE (January 2022): Partner (Spieker) $ 395 Director (Zimmerman) $ 345 Assoc. Director (Gockel) $ 325 Manager(Rosenker) $ 305 Sr. Assoc. Consultant $ 300 Assoc. Consultant (Hawn) $ 270 The above hourly rates apply to all services performed on the Client's behalf to the nearest quarter of an hour, including travel time. Computerized time and expense reports are included with HKA's monthly billing statements or are otherwise available upon request. HKA reserves the right to review and adjust this Fee Schedule effective January 1st of each year. Out-of-pocket expenses such as travel, lodging, meals and overnight couriers will be billed at cost. Special project expenses such as laboratory tests, special fees, extra insurance, equipment, materials, charges for outside computer services, etc., will be billed at cost plus 15%. Mileage will be charged at the current U.S. Federal Government rate. Copies of expense receipts are available upon request. C. Retainer: HKA will not require a retainer prior to commencement of services HKA Glnba I Inc. One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, Suite 820 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Packet Pg. 334 7.19 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Residential Occupancy Code Amendments Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The Washington State Legislature adopted Senate Bill (SB) 5235 during the 2021 legislative session to address "Housing Unit Inventory - Removing Limits." It was signed by the Governor in May 2021 and addresses local control over residential occupancy restrictions. Specifically, it limits a local government's ability to regulate the number of occupants living within a household (dwelling). The only exceptions are for occupancy limits assigned in the Building Code, group homes, and short-term rentals. The applicable portion of SB 5235 is provided as Exhibit 1. Note: The majority of SB 5235 was vetoed by the Governor. To avoid confusion, the vetoed and non -applicable sections have not been included. The Planning Board discussed the potential code amendments at their October 28, 2021 and December 8, 2021 meetings, and held a public hearing on January 12, 2022 which they forwarded a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council heard an introduction to the draft residential occupancy code amendments at the April 5, 2022 Council meeting and held a public hearing on May 3, 2022. Staff Recommendation Adopt residential occupancy code amendments with the ordinance provided in Exhibit 1. Narrative SB 5235 removes the City's ability to set limits on the number of people living in a household. The Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) contains several references to occupancy limits in the definitions section of the code. The definition for Families (ECDC 21.30.10) and the Criteria for Attached Accessory Dwelling Units (ECDC 20.21.030) both currently contain limits on the number of unrelated persons that can live in a dwelling unit. The purpose of this code amendment is to remove these specific occupancy limits and replace them with other criteria and standards to address how a single-family dwelling (structure) operates. The definition of family changes across time and across cultures. Traditionally family has been defined as two or more people who are related by blood, marriage, and adoption. Traditional families may also include joint families where three or more generations of blood relatives live in a single household. These joint families often include cousins, aunts and uncles, and other relatives from the extended Packet Pg. 335 7.19 family. Modern families exist in many forms including the single parent family, foster families, same -sex couples, childfree families, and many other variations from traditional norms. In many cases, people do not grow up with their family of orientation, but become part of a stepfamily or blended family. These code amendments while compliant with state law also provide a more realistic and inclusive definition of family. The draft amendment covers three main areas: 1) Updating the definition of a Family in ECDC 21.30.010 to remove residential occupancy limits. 2) Strengthening the definitions for single-family dwelling units. 3) Updating accessory dwelling unit (ADU) requirements for consistency. The main element of the code amendment is removing the limitations for unrelated people living in a house from the definition of a family. The definition will maintain limitations on certain group usages such as halfway homes. It also maintains other provisions of the family definition in ECDC 21.30.010. The other major component involves finding other ways to maintain and protect the single-family zoning and usage. To do that, staff has focused on including tangible and objective criteria to the single-family dwelling (unit) definition in ECDC 21.90.080. It includes adding structural requirements, such as limitations to one mailbox, electric meter, water meter, and gas meter (An exception was provided for properties with an approved ADU that two mailboxes may be allowed). It will codify the requirement for common access to living, sleeping, cooking, eating areas. This should help ensure single-family zoning and usage remain without relying on residential occupancy limits. Lastly, it updates several accessory dwelling unit code sections to remove residential occupancy requirements. It does however maintain the owner -occupancy requirement and rental limits that currently exist. One commenter during the May 3rd public hearing questioned whether the city still needs a definition of family. There are 255 references to family in Titles 15 through 24 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Given this number of references to family, staff feels it is important to maintain a definition of family at this type. Removing family and/or considering the impact that would have in all the other aspects of the development code would require an extensive review. At this time, staff recommends that code amendments as proposed in Exhibit 2 be adopted for compliance with state law. A more extensive review of family and an appropriate replacement may be considered with the Comprehensive Plan update. The relevant portion of SB 5235 is provided in Exhibit 3 and the draft code language is provided in Exhibit 2. Planning Board minute excerpts are contained in Exhibits 4 - 6. The SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance and SEPA Checklist are provided in Exhibit 7. An excerpt of the City Council April 5, 2022 meeting is proved in Exhibit 8 and a draft ordinance for the adoption of the residential occupancy code is provided in Exhibit 1. Draft minutes from the May 3rd public hearing are included in the consent agenda for this meeting. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Draft Residential Occupancy Code Amendments Ordinance Exhibit 2: Draft Residential Occupancy Code Amendments PB Recommendation Exhibit 3 - SB 5235 (Simplified) Exhibit 4: October 27, 2021 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 336 7.19 Exhibit 5: December 8, 2021 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 6: January 12, 2022 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 7: Residential Occupancy SEPA DNS and Checklist Exhibit 8: April 5, 2022 City Council Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 337 7.19.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATED TO RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY LIMITS. WHEREAS, in 2021, the Legislature adopted ESSB 5235, which was described in the final bill report as "increasing housing unit inventory by removing arbitrary limits on housing options;" and WHEREAS, the final bill report describes the unrelated occupancy provisions as follows "Cities, towns, code cities, and counties may not regulate or limit the number of unrelated persons that may occupy a household or dwelling unit except for any occupant limits on group living arrangements regulated under state law or on short-term rentals and any lawful limits on occupant load per square foot or generally applicable health and safety provisions as established by applicable building code or city ordinance;" and WHEREAS, the planning board considered and ultimately recommended certain amendments to the Edmonds Community Development Code that are intended to implement the new legal requirements described above; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 20.21.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Density limitation — Limitation on the total occupancy," is hereby amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in s4ile dffetigh). Section 2. Subsections D and F of Section 20.21.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Criteria for attached accessory dwelling units," is hereby amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st ike- Packet Pg. 338 7.19.a Section 3. Section 21.20.050 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Dwelling unit," is hereby amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in s4ile thfettgh). Section 4. Section 21.30.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Family," is hereby amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike through). Section 5. Section 21.90.080 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Single-family dwelling (unit)," is hereby amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strive through). Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: Packet Pg. 339 7.19.a PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Q Packet Pg. 340 7.19.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATED TO RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY LIMITS. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2022. 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 E CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 341 7.19.b Draft Residential Occupancy Code Amendment, w/ Planning Board Recommendations Section Modified 20.21.020 Density limitation — Limitation on the total occupancy (ADUs) 20.21.030 Criteria for attached accessory dwelling units (ADUs) 21.20.050 Dwelling unit. 21.30.010 Families. 21.90.080 Single-family dwelling (unit) ADU Changes (Chapter 20.21) 20.21.020 Density limitation — Limitation on the total occupancy. Exe pt as pre-vided- i., FECD Rn fer the - ,,.Ja+ien „f the d*r;;hip J � No lot shall be — occupied by more than one family as defined in ECDC 21.30.010. This limitation shall be interpreted to accomplish its purpose, which is to ensure that the approval of an accessory dwelling unit shall not increase the overall density of a single-family residential neighborhood. 20.21.030 Criteria for attached accessory dwelling units. D. Location and Appearance. The single-family appearance and character of the residence shall be maintained when viewed from the surrounding neighborhood. The design of the accessory dwelling unit shall be incorporated into the design of the principal dwelling unit and shall be designed to maintain the architectural design, style, appearance and character of the main building as a single-family residence using matching materials, colors, window style, and roof design. The primary entrance to the accessory dwelling unit shall be located in such a manner as to be unobtrusive when viewed from the street. Whenever possible, new entrances should be placed at the side or rear of the building. Only one electric, one gas meter, and one water meter shall be allowed for the entire building, serving both the primary residence and the accessory dwelling unit. An additional mailbox can be added to the lot if the accessory dwelling unit is approved according to the requirements for an accessory dwelling unit found in Chapter 20.21 ECDC. Accessory dwelling units must be located within or attached to single-family dwelling units. F. Occupancy. Either the primary dwelling or the accessory dwelling unit shall be owner -occupied. "Owner -occupied" shall mean a property owner who makes his or her legal residence at the site, as evidenced by voter registration, vehicle registration, or similar means, and actually resides at the site more than six months out of any given year, and at no time receives rent for the owner -occupied unit 1.20.22 Proposed amendments are shown with stFikethreugh to denote text to be deleted and underline to denote text to be added. Packet Pg. 342 7.19.b Draft The owner(s) shall not rent the designated owner -occupied unit at any time during the pendency of the ADU permit; any such rental shall void the permit. The owner(s) shall not rent any portion of the owner occupied residence either during the owner(s)' occupancy or while the owner is absent from the owner occupied unit for any period. In no event shall the *^+^l 4G4 occupants of the lot exceed one family as defined in this code; provided however, that Of the aceesseFy dwelling „nit ;� mur-se A_F other eaFegiveF assisting a disabled person ;Aohe iS an erce-upant of the prinempal residence, eF th -1 - - - I- I - -1 - - - - - . - - -- -1 - _- i L - . - ... - - - I - - - - - i I- - - - - - - - - - - - - I M - - � i - t - . - - t - - - M � - - . - - - - I- - - - - - - - - - -1 1- . . - - - exceed ene family as defined in thaS c--e4e-. Changes to Definitions (Title 21) 21.20.050 Dwelling unit. Dwelling unit means a building, or portion thereof, providing complete housekeeping facilities for one family, which includes permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. Dwelling unit does not include recreation vehicles or mobile homes. (See also, Multiple Dwelling Units and Family.) 21.30.010 Famaiees Family. A. Family means individuals censis*i^^ of two or mere persons related or unrelated by genetics, adoption, or marriage, or f five or fewer peFSORS .,he @Fe IRGet Related by geReties, a deptiOR ., , or marriage +., ,II .,f+he members .,f such group living in a dwelling unit. B. The term "family" shall include: 1. State licensed adult family homes required to be recognized as residential use pursuant to RCW 74.4-29440 70.1281 2. State licensed foster family homes and group care facilities as defined in RCW 74.15.180, subject to the exclusion of subsection {Q of this section; 3. Group homes for the disabled required to be accommodated as residential uses pursuant to the Fair Housing Act amendments as the same exists or is hereafter amended. C. The term "family" shall exclude individuals residing in halfway houses, crisis residential centers as defined in RCW � .' n�(3)( �74.15.020.1.c, group homes licensed for juvenile offenders, or other facilities, whether or not licensed by the state, where individuals are incarcerated or otherwise required to reside pursuant to court order under the supervision of paid staff and personnel. 1.20.22 Proposed amendments are shown with stFikethiceugh to denote text to be deleted and underline to denote text to be added. Packet Pg. 343 7.19.b Draft D. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). When an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is approved pursuant to Chapter 20.21 ECDC, only one of the dwelling units, either the primary residence or the ADU, shall be used to house renters and E)F uRFelated peFSORS I.VhA_ are SWid 9CCUPa e# the 401 1 Sh-,II net .,.J ^ ^ family as de -fined- ubseetie -. (A) of this Seetae.A. 4. E. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit normal hosting activities associated with residential use. 21.90.080 Single-family dwelling (unit). Single-family dwelling (and single-family dwelling unit) means a detached building used by ^^^ fan4y configured as described herein and occupied or intended to be occupied by one family, limited to one per lot. A single-family dwelling shall be limited to one mailbox, electric meter, gas meter, and water meter. It will also have common access to and common use of all living, kitchen, and eating areas within the dwelling unit. An additional mailbox can be added to the lot if it is associated with an accessory dwelling unit approved according to the requirements for an accessory dwelling unit found in Chapter ?0_?1 FCDC_ 1.20.22 Proposed amendments are shown with stFil(ethFeugh to denote text to be deleted and underline to denote text to be added. Packet Pg. 344 7.19.c CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5235 Chapter 306, Laws of 2021 (partial veto) 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session HOUSING UNIT INVENTORY —REMOVING LIMITS EFFECTIVE DATE: July 25, 2021 Passed by the Senate April 14, 2021 Yeas 30 Nays 18 DENNY HECK President of the Senate Passed by the House April 7, 2021 Yeas 57 Nays 40 LAURIE JINKINS Speaker of the House of Representatives Approved May 13, 2021 11:53 AM with the exception of sections 1, 3, and 4, which are vetoed. JAY INSLEE Governor of the State of Washington CERTIFICATE I, Brad Hendrickson, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5235 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. BRAD HENDRICKSON Secretary FILED May 13, 2021 Secretary of State State of Washington r c as E c a� E Q m 0 U v c a O c d .y m d E Cn Ln M N LO m Cn ch z K W c d E t 0 r Q Packet Pg. 345 7.19.c ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5235 AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE Passed Legislature - 2021 Regular Session State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By Senate Housing & Local Government (originally sponsored by Senators Liias, Das, Nguyen, Nobles, Saldana, and Wilson, C.) READ FIRST TIME 02/05/21. m E c a� E Q m 0 U v c v v O 1 AN ACT Relating to increasing housing unit inventory by removing 2 arbitrary limits on housing options; amending RCW 36.70A.696, 3 36.70A.697, and 36.70A.698; adding a new section to chapter 35.21 4 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 35A.21 RCW; adding a new section 5 to chapter 36.01 RCW; and creating a new section. .Q E 6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: N M N LO 7 *NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that local zoning m 8 laws can contribute to limiting the housing available for C, 9 Washingtonians. The legislature finds that reducing these barriers r 10 can increase affordable hog options. The legislature finds that w 11 accessory dwelling units can %oneway to add affordable long-term 12 housing and to provide a needed � reaee in housing density. However, E 13 the legislature finds that resea from several cities shows that r Q 14 when accessory dwelling units are b)lt and offered for short-term 15 rental for tourists and business vis" rs, they may not improve 16 housing affordability. Therefore, it is t -ntent of the legislature 17 to encourage reducing barriers to accessory 2l%elling units when local 18 governments have programs to incentivize or assure that they will be 19 utilized for long-term housing. The legislature finds that owner 20 occupancy requirements may provide an appropriate means for local 21 governments to ensure community impacts of accessory dwelling unit.- P. 1 E S S packet Pg. 346 7.19.c 1 applicable health and safety provisions as established by appli, 2 building code or city ordinance, a city or town may not regulate or 3 limit the number of unrelated persons that may occupy a household or 4 dwelling unit. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NEW SECTION._ Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 35A.21 RCW to read as follows: Except for occupant limits on group living arrangements regulated under state law or on short-term rentals as defined in RCW 64.37.010 0 and any lawful limits on occupant load per square foot or generally a applicable health and safety provisions as established by applicable building code or city ordinance, a code city may not regulate or c E limit the number of unrelated persons that may occupy a household or dwelling unit. 0 NEW SECTION._ Sec. 7. A new section is added to chapter 36.01 c 3 RCW to read as follows:,<V- O Except for occupant limits on group living arrangements regulated under state law o short-term rentals as defined in RCW ,Nn 64.37.010 and any lawful limi't�gn occupant load per square foot or generally applicable health and Q�ety provisions as established by .. applicable building code or couni>ordinance, a county may not regulate or limit the number of�(Ctnrelated persons that may occupy a household or dwelling unit. W M Passed by the Senate April 14, 2021. LO Passed by the House April 7, 2021. W Approved by the Governor May 13, 2021, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed. Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 13, 2021. -2 z x w Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:; c "I am returning herewith, without my approval as to Sections 1, 3, E and 4, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5235 entitled: "AN ACT Relating to increasing housing unit inventory by removing arbitrary limits on housing options." a Section 3 allows cities to delay local implementation of statewide requirements around siting of accessory dwelling units until two years after their next required comprehensive plan update. Accessory dwelling units play an important role in creating additional housing options in urban areas and the state is currently facing a housing crisis. Section 4 limits the ability for local governments to require owner occupancy on lots containing an accessory dwelling unit, but it also creates numerous exceptions to that limitation which are problematic. I am concerned that the language may allow a local government to p. 6 E S S Packet Pg. 347 7.19.c prevent the siting and development of accessory dwelling units in perpetuity with very little justification. Section 1 establishes the intent of the bill. Due to the vetoes of Sections 3 and 4, the original statement of intent no longer fully applies to this bill. For these reasons I have vetoed Sections 1, 3, and 4 of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5235. With the exception of Sections 1, 3, and 4, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5235 is approved." --- END --- p. 7 E S S Packet Pg. 348 7.19.d specific. Angie Feser: Suggests calling it the Marsh Restoration Project. Chair Rosen: Asks for the members to vote. (all say aye or raise their hands) Motion to Recommend the 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to City Council with the following recommendations: 1. That staff do their best to explain the funding aspect of the CFP to the public and explain why items are located where they are, particularly the Marsh Restoration Project and other projects that incorporate multiple components of the CFP. 2. That the City should establish a formal process to establish values and a vision of Edmonds that would be as part of, and lead, the Comprehensive Planning process. 3. Seek opportunities to shift monies or look for funding to move forward with projects that advance equity throughout the City. Motion passes 6-0. (Discussion on whether the motion includes the overall recommendation. Clarifies that it was part of the motion.) Chair Rosen: Closes this part of the agenda and thanks Rob, Angie, and Shannon. New Item- Code Amendment to Update Residential Occupancy Standards Chair Rosen: Asks Eric Engmann to introduce the item. Eric Engmann: Walks through the presentation. • This will be a code update that affects residential occupancy standards in the City. • Mentions the topics will cover the Senate Bill that requires these changes, non- compliant city code sections, and some potential solutions. Discusses Residential Occupancy Limits in general. • Limits the number of unrelated people living in a dwelling. • Started with tenement laws in the late 19th century to protect overcrowding • Such a part of planning that our zoning categories are based on these terms: single- family and multifamily. • This is an issue because it doesn't address 21 st century living or what a family really looks like. • There have been plenty of case law that has slowly removed the ability to set these Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 19 Packet Pg. 349 7.19.d limits. Senate Bill (SB) 5235 • Bill passed by State in 2021 that prohibits cities from doing this with a few exceptions. • Cities can no longer regulate the number of unrelated persons occupying a home. • Cities often use this to limit other uses in residential zoning. Conflicting Edmonds Code Sections • The Edmonds definition for a family in ECDC 21.30.010 sets this limit to five unrelated persons living in a house. • Mentions many other definitions in the code are related to this family definition. Possible Solutions • Will remove these references per state law and look at other section that need updates • Will look for solutions to ensure single-family uses and zones are maintained. • Clarifies that the single-family zoning categories and uses will not be removed. Two Possible Approaches to the Updates • Highlights several options for new criteria • Includes limitations on the number of items that generally represent multifamily living, such as the number of mailboxes, gas meters, garbage collection areas, etc. • Can also include limitations on components of usage, such as having common access to living, sleeping, and cooking facilities. • Mentions that these are just options but not necessarily ones that staff will propose. • Staff is currently working with the legal team to ensure that the recommendations are well vetted. Rob Chave: Further clarifies that staff will be looking more toward measurable things rather than things like lease arrangements. Eric Engmann: Mentions staff will come back in about a month with draft recommendations. Also discusses the webpage on www.edmondswa.gov/codeupdates that covers this issue and allows people to sign up for notifications. Board Discussion on this Item. Chair Rosen: Opens it up to Board questions. Judi Gladstone: Asks what other places, not just locally, are doing to deal with this. Talks about the challenge with trying to regulate the many living arrangements in the single-family defined residences. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 20 Packet Pg. 350 7.19.d Eric Engmann: Mentions these limits are still used by the vast majority of the country. • Many cities that have looked at this, have done so to remove single-family zoning districts. • There are very few examples of things done between those two ideas. • Even with this new state law, most Washington cities haven't updated this code yet. Vice Chair Crank: Talks about her experience and some recommendations. • Would recommend having directed messages to renters and property owners that rent. • Mentions common area standards would be easier to include. • Discusses using limitations on things like mailboxes or water meters. • Talks about all of the 21 st century living arrangements that make this needed. Judi Gladstone: Mentions multigenerational households and how that will continue to grow. Vice Chair Crank: Mentions single people with a mortgage that will rely on others living there to make those mortgage payments. Eric Engmann: Recommends that the Board start thinking about scenarios can be tested against the draft recommendations in the next session. New Item- Student Representative to the Planning Board Chair Rosen: Introduces the next topic. • Mentions there was an application for student rep from Lily Distelhorst. • Talks about her application and her desire to learn more about urban planning. • The Chair and Vice Chair met with her. Rob Chave: Mentions Lily has been in the audience all night. Vice Chair Crank: Says she had a great meeting with her and asks if she would like to talk. Lily Distelhorst: Introduces herself. • Currently a sophomore in high school. • Looking at majoring in Urban Planning. • Passionate about affordable housing and public transit. Chair Rosen: Makes a motion that Lily become the student representative to the Board. (Motion and Seconded) Affirmation is unanimous. All welcome her to the Board. Chair Rosen: Mentions she will be getting a city email address and will receive the packet. She can't vote but will be a great voice to the conversation. Planning Board Minutes October 27, 2021 Page 21 Packet Pg. 351 7.19.e AUDIENCE COMMENTS Natalie Seitz spoke regarding the PROS (Parks, Recreation, and Open Space) plan resources and the SR99 Corridor. She stressed that the City does not own the land that Mathay-Ballinger Park is on in its entirety. Its play structures are partially located on right-of-way, and modifications are only allowed through Temporary Limited Use Permit authorization from the Snohomish County Public Utility District (PUD). The PUD has the perpetual right to build an electrical substation that they are currently allowing park uses on. Since Highway 99 is an area of concern for utility upgrades, she is concerned about the limitations and risks to the only existing city park to serve the Highway 99 uptown area. She discussed multiple issues with this park and urged the City to work harder and invest in durable park resources to provide equity in this area. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Residential Occupancy Code Amendment Senior Planner Engmann continued a previous discussion on existing Residential Occupancy Limits standards and amendments that need to be made because of state legislation that happened this past year. He gave a recap of SB 5235 and the city's existing code section. SB 5235 prohibits local governments from limiting the number of unrelated persons occupying a home. There are some exceptions for short-term rentals, building code occupancy loads, and some group homes. SB 5235 also addressed owner requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), but this was vetoed by the governor. Regarding the portion limiting the number of unrelated persons occupying a home, the conflicting portions of Edmonds' code are in the Section A with the definition of "family" and Section D — Calculations in Single -Family Zones. The proposed draft would: • Remove residential occupancy limits (per state legislation) • Maintain limits on number of dwellings in single-family zoning • Shorten the definition of "Family" to include related or unrelated individuals • Rely on the definition of a single-family dwelling to enforce the single-family component of it. Strengthen structural/element requirements for single-family dwellings which doesn't rely on the people that live inside the dwelling (one mailbox, water meter, gas meter ... common access to rooms) • Maintain section that talks about Group Living and Exclusions from Family Definition. • Maintain provisions limiting the rental of an ADU to either the primary house or the ADU • Maintain provision allowing normal hosting activities • Strengthen the definition of Single -Family Dwelling Unit and add criteria to the definition. • Maintain the requirement for one family and one dwelling per lot • Adds requirements to limit one mailbox, water meter, and gas meter and to have common access to and common use of all living, kitchen and eating areas • Strengthen definition of Dwelling Unit so that it aligns better with the State's definition. A portion was added that states that it includes: permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation • Remove exceptions for nurses and caregivers in Accessory Dwelling Unit section because this isn't needed anymore • Maintain owner -occupancy requirement for ADUs • Remove exceptions in the density limitation for ADUs because these aren't needed anymore. • Maintain density limits for ADUs a Planning Board Meeting Minutes December 8, 2021 Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 352 7.19.e Board Member Pence referred to the criteria for determining a single-family dwelling, he noted that a limit on one kitchen is used in some jurisdictions. Regarding ADUs and mailboxes, he commented that it seems reasonable to allow a separate mailbox for the ADU. Mr. Engmann commented that a lot of modern homes have two kitchens so this could be problematic. Staff opted to use scenarios which are more common to all single-family dwellings. He noted it is likely that the ADU code will be coming to the Planning Board for review in the not -too -distant future so they can look at the mailbox regulations at that time. Board Member Pence asked how often the City must engage in enforcement actions regarding the number of people in a dwelling. Mr. Engmann replied that they often get calls, but it is usually related to a secondary issue like the number of cars. Chair Rosen referred to the section on owner occupancy and asked for more information about the ability to leave and or rent. Specifically, he wondered if VRBOs and the like were acceptable in Edmonds. Mr. Engmann replied that you can only rent out the main home or the ADU, but not both. Commissioner Gladstone asked for confirmation that a scenario with a senior and a caregiver would be covered under this definition. Mr. Engmann replied that it would be. Commissioner Gladstone asked why the criteria focused on water and gas but not electric. Mr. Engmann was not sure but noted they could add electric. Planning Manager Chave added that the City permits water and gas, but electrical is entirely done through the State; it would be much more difficult to get information. Commissioner Gladstone noted that some utilities (like water) like to have separate meters on ADUs. Mr. Engmann indicated they could look at that. Mr. Chave stated this provision has been in place for many years with no problems. Mr. Engmann commented that individuals may sign up for updates at www.edmondswa.gov/codgWdates. There was consensus to move forward with scheduling of a public hearing on this item. NEW BUSINESS Item B was addressed first because Commissioner Gladstone had to leave the meeting early. B. Election of Officers for 2022 COMMISSIONER PENCE NOMINATED ALICIA CRANK FOR CHAIR FOR 2022. CHAIR ROSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. COMMISSIONER CRANK ACCEPTED THE NOMINATION AND WAS ELECTED UNANIMOUSLY. CHAIR ROSEN NOMINATED ROGER PENCE FOR VICE CHAIR FOR 2022. THE MOTION WASLn " SECONDED. COMMISSIONER PENCE ACCEPTED THE NOMINATION AND WAS ELECTED UNANIMOUSLY. x w A. Multifamily Design Standards: Intro and Scoping Exercise as E Mr. Engmann explained this is a dual conversation with the Architectural Design Board. He introduced the code amendment and the scoping/framework on the zoning. The three phases of the code amendment process are the formation phase, the articulation phase, and the adoption phase. This topic is currently in the formation process a where they create initial ideas, create objectives, establish an outreach plan, gather information have initial Planning Board Meeting Minutes December 8, 2021 Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 353 7.19.f Greg Ferguson discussed environmental issues which he believes should be included in the PROS Plan. These include a Marsh Comprehensive Plan, climate change issues, water quality issues, and the impact of rising sea levels on marine parks. He asked that the PROS Plan be delayed until they can be addressed. Bernie Bush commented that there had been a previous discussion about putting the plans for the marsh under Parks; however, the PROS Plan shows no money allocated until 2023 or 2024. He asked what money would be used to leverage grants to purchase the property. He asked that this be determined as soon as possible. PUBLIC HEARING A. Code Amendment to Update Residential Occupancy Standards Mr. Engmann gave a recap of SB 5235, the related city code section, and the proposed code amendment. He summarized that SB 5235 would prohibit local governments from limiting the number of unrelated persons from occupying a home with a few exceptions. This has resulted in the need to revise the definition of family in Edmonds city code. The new definition says that "Family means individuals related or unrelated by genetics, adoption, or marriage living in a dwelling unit." The amendments would: • remove the residential occupancy limits; • strengthen structural/element requirements for single family dwellings such as one mailbox, water meter, gas meter ... common access to living, sleeping, cooking, eating areas; • maintain limits on number of dwellings in single family zoning districts; and • maintain restrictions on group homes Staff is recommending that the Planning Board decide whether to transmit the proposal to City Council for review and adoption. Board Member Questions: Board Member Gladstone asked why they didn't include electrical meters in the list of uses for structural/element requirements for single-family dwellings. Mr. Engmann explained that the City doesn't do electrical permits so it would not be easily checked or monitored. Board Member Gladstone expressed concern because this is one thing that is often metered separately. Water and gas are rarely metered separately. Vice Chair Pence commented he believes that ADUs should have the option of a separate mailbox. 6 The public hearing was opened at 7:35 p.m. and public testimony was solicited. Seeing no public comments, the public hearing was closed at 7:36 p.m. W c m Board Discussion: E Board Member Rosen expressed support for Board Member Gladstone's and Vice Chair Pence's comments. Q Planning Board Meeting Minutes January 12, 2022 Page 3 of 9 Packet Pg. 354 7.19.f Board Member Gladstone asked if, as they forward this to the City Council, they can recommend areas for the City Council to look at as part of their review. Chair Crank replied that they could. Board Member Gladstone asked that both of the issues that she and Vice Chair Pence raised be flagged for the City Council. Mr. Engmann summarized the Board's two recommendations: • Single family dwellings shall be limited to one electric meter, and • An additional mailbox may be permitted for an approved accessory dwelling unit. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, TO FORWARD THIS TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE WITH CONSIDERATION OF THOSE TWO POTENTIAL CHANGES. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Draft Plan Parks Director Feser introduced this item. She was very happy to have members of the public reviewing the Plan and providing comment. Consultant Steve Duh from Conservation Technix made a PowerPoint presentation regarding the draft PROS Plan. He gave an overview of the Plan and steps to building it including inventory assessments, community engagement, system -wide needs assessment, goals and policies review, capital project planning, implementation and funding strategies, and plan review and approval. He discussed the project timeline and reviewed community feedback. Community feedback revealed that priority improvements to the park system included connecting gaps in the trail system and expanding trail connections, improving or upgrading existing parks and amenities, buying more conservation and open space lands, renovating or replacing the pool, and improving restroom facilities. In recreation programming, there was a strong interest in community events such as outdoor movies and Hazel Miller Plaza summer concerts. There was also continued and strong interest in outdoor programs, youth programs, and youth sports programs and camps. Mr. Duh reviewed the Plan structure and content. The contents included Introduction & Community Profile, Community Engagement, Goals & Objectives, Inventory & Classifications, Parks & Open Space, Recreation Programs & Facilities, Trails & Connections, Capital Projects & Implementation, and Appendices. System analysis used in the PROS Plan involved examining system gaps related to park access and distribution; physical accessibility; diversity of places and spaces; programs, events, and activities; serving today's residents; and planning for future growth. He reviewed approaches to analyzing service standards used in this Plan including acreage/population-based, distribution/proximity-based, and quality/condition. One of the recommendations of this Plan is to adjust the service standards to be more focused toward the community/neighborhood parks and the open spaces, realign standards for trails around the notion of connectivity, and reframe some of the calculations on active -use and open space. Some other metrics include discussion of current quality, distribution, and usage. Key recommendations include: Planning Board Meeting Minutes January 12, 2022 Page 4 of 9 Packet Pg. 355 Off" t•,U,L/ U� CITY OF EDMONDS ts1 18c)0 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: The proposed code amendment addresses changes made by the 2021 Washington State Legislature in SB 5235, which removes the City's ability to set limits on the number of people living in a household. The proposed amendment removes these specific occupancy limits that currently exist in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) under the definition for Families in ECDC 21.30.010 and replaces them with other criteria and standards to address how the single-family dwelling (structure) operates. Proponent: City of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address if any: City Wide. Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The City of Edmonds has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by February 24, 2022. Project Planner: Eric Engmann, Senior Planner Responsible Official: Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 980?0 1 425-771-0220 1 ;l Date: February 10, 2022 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than March 3, 2022. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Kernen Lien to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on February 10, 2022, at City Hall, Edmonds Public Library, and the Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@ecy.wa.gov). XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and associated documents can be obtained online at https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under 7.19.g Page I oft SEPA DETERMINATION RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY CODE AMENDMENT AMD02021-0003 2/9/22 SEPA Packet Pg. 356 7.19.g permit number AMD2021-0003, by emailing the project planner (eric.engmann@edmondswa.gov), or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Distribution List: This DNS and SEPA checklist were distributed to the following: N Applicant ❑ Parties of Record ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish and Wildlife ❑ Puget Sound Energy N Snohomish PUD ❑ Olympic View Water & Sewer ❑ Alderwood Water District N Edmonds School District ❑ Port of Edmonds N South County Fire ❑ Swedish Hospital ❑ Community Transit pc: File No. SEPA Notebook N Dept. of Ecology ❑ Dept. of Ecology - Shorelands ❑ Dept. of Natural Resources N Dept. of Commerce ❑ WSDOT ❑ WSDOT — Ferries ❑ Dept. of Fish & Wildlife ❑ Dept. of Health — Drinking Water ❑ Dept. of Arch. & Historic Pres. ❑ Dept. of Parks and Rec. Commission ❑ Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ❑ Puget Sound Regional Council ❑ Puget Sound Partnership N Tulalip Tribe N City of Everett N City of Lynnwood N City of Mountlake Terrace ❑ City of Mukilteo N City of Shoreline ❑ Town of Woodway ❑ Snohomish Co. Public Works ❑ Snohomish Co. PDS ❑ Snohomish Co. Health Dist. ❑ King County - Transit ❑ King County — Environ. Planning ❑ Other Page 2 of 2 SEPA DETERMINATION RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY CODE AMENDMENT AMD02021-0003 2/9/22. SEPA Packet Pg. 357 OF ED�O �a ##P71 Vt.,gCITY OF EDMONDS g ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist. Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process. 7.19.g The checklist questions apply to all parts ofyour proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements — that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Residential Occupancy Code Amendment 2. Name of applicant: City of Edmonds 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Eric Engmann, Senior Planner City of Edmonds 121 5t' Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Q WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist guidance updated June 2011 Packet Pg. 358 7.19.g 4. Date checklist prepared: January 29, 2022 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The city sponsored amendment has been reviewed by the local Planning Board and is intended for review by the City Council in Spring 2022. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No further activity is planned at this time. Staff will monitor the outcomes of the proposed amendment and any new state legislation to see if any future amendments are necessary. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. No direct environmental information has been prepared for this proposed amendment. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No pendind applications or approvals would be affected. Once adopted, the proposed would apply all residential development within the City of Edmonds. Permit applications within the City of Edmonds would be processed according to the regulations and procedures in effect at the time the application was determined to be complete. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 1) Review and determinations under the State Environmental Policy Act for non -project actions; and 2) Adoption by the Edmonds City Council. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non -project action for an amendment to the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The proposed code amendment (AMD2021-003) addresses changes made by the 2021 Washington State Legislature in SB 5235, which removes the City's ability to set limits on the number of people living in a household. The proposed amendment removes these specific occupancy limits that currently exist in the Edmonds Community " Development Code (ECDC) under the definition for Families in ECDC 21.30.010, and replaces them with other criteria and .r standards to address how a single-family dwelling (structure) operates. This will ensure that the intent of single-family dwelling units and single-family zoning remains intact without limiting the number of people living in the household. x w 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your m proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would E occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, M vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to Q this checklist. This is a citywide non -project action that will affect development throughout the City of Edmonds. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 15 Packet Pg. 359 7.19.g B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long- term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. £ Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildi ngs)? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. Q SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 15 Packet Pg. 360 7.19.g c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The City of Edmonds sits along the western shores of the Puget Sound and contains a number of relatively small streams including Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek, Hindley Creek, Northstream, Frutidale Creek, Perinville Creek, Meadowdale Creek and a number of smaller unnamed creeks. Portions of Lake Ballinger are also located within the City of Edmonds' jurisdiction. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The 100-year flood plain is mapped for the City of Edmonds on the Snohomish County Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance rate maps. Within Edmonds, the 100-year flood plain is shown around the Edmonds Marsh, the Port of Edmonds, near the mouths of Shell Creek and Perrinville Creeks. The flood plan is also mapped around the shoreline of Lake Ballinger. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the Q SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 15 Packet Pg. 361 7.19.g following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass asture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. r� .r b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? s x w N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c am c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. E z c� N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. Q d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 15 Packet Pg. 362 7.19.g N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable to a non -project action. S. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Numerous fish and wildlife species depend on the Edmonds shoreline and adjacent shoreland habitats for either part or all of a life stage. Shellfish resources include clams, mussels, crab, and shrimp. Eight species of salmonids use nearshore areas of Puget Sound at some point in their life cycle. These include Chinook, chum, coho, sockeye, and pink salmon and sea -run cutthroat, steelhead, and bull trout. Birds with priority habitats that occur within the City include bald eagle, purple martin, and great blue heron. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Several federally listed threatened or endangered species that may inhabit marine waters or adjacent habitats within the City are identified in the State database The threatened marbled murelet are observed intermittently in inland Puget Sound waters; winter and summer surveys by WDFW conducted near Edmonds found no murrelets in winter and only a few birds in the Edmonds area in summer. Federally listed threatened fish species that may occur in or in the vicinity of Edmonds, including Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull trout. Federally listed marine mammals (Steller sea lion and Puget Sound orcas) may be present in the Edmonds shore zone, but are not commonly observed. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The shoreline of Puget Sound provides a migratory route for salmon and the City of Edmonds is located within the Pacific Flyway, which is a flight corridor for migrating waterfowl and other birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. r� N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. .r x 6. Energy and Natural Resources w a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet c the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, z manufacturing, etc. Q N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 15 Packet Pg. 363 7.19.g b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. IM 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. h. Noise .r 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? X w N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c m E 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 15 Packet Pg. 364 7.19.g 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. The proposed non -project, non -site -specific action would not affect current land uses or nearby or adjacent properties. Single-family residential uses are relatively evenly dispersed throughout the city and occupy the majority of the city's land use base. Approximately 3,100 acres, or 55 percent of the City's area is developed for single-family residential uses. Higher density residential development (including apartments and condominiums) is primarily located south and north of the downtown; in the vicinity of the Edmonds-Woodway High School site and Stevens Hospital; and adjacent to 196th Street, 76th Avenue and Highway 99. Together, single-family and multi -family residential units comprise approximately 3,400 acres (nearly 60 percent of the total land in the city). Commercial activity is concentrated in two principal areas -- the Downtown/Waterfront and the Highway 99 corridor (which includes the retail and medical development in the vicinity of Swedish Hospital). Smaller commercial nodes that primarily serve adjacent neighborhoods are located at the intersection of Edmonds Way (SR104) and 100th Avenue/9th Avenue (Westgate) and at212th Street/84th Avenue (5 Corners). The Port of Edmonds is located in the southern portion of the city's waterfront. The Port owns and manages 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats (approximately I I acres). The Port's property is occupied by approximately 80 businesses including office uses located in Harbor Square. Approximately 258 acres of parks and open space lands are owned or operated by the City, while there are another 229 acres of County -owned parks and open space land in the Edmonds area. Regional parks and beaches figure prominently in the City, including Brackett's Landing North and South, the Edmonds Fishing Pier, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, Edmonds Underwater Park, Marina Beach Park, Olympic Beach Park, local tidelands, and the South County Senior Center. The Edmonds Marsh is a significant City -owned open space (23 acres), while Yost Memorial Park is the largest community park owned by the City (4S acres). The largest County resources are Southwest County Park (120 acres) and Meadowdale Beach County Park (95 acres). Overall, approximately 96 percent of the city is developed. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: c. Describe any structures on the site. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Q SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 15 Packet Pg. 365 7.19.g N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. £ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. in. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial " significance, if any: 1-- .r N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. x u.l c 9. Housing E a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. Q SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 15 Packet Pg. 366 7.19.g N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. This is a measure intended to comply with State legislation in 2021 (SB 5235), which semoves a municipality's ability to regulate the number of unrelated occupants living in a household. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. r� c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? x w N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. }; c m d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: c� N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. Q 12. Recreation SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 15 Packet Pg. 367 7.19.g a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The City of Edmonds has a number of recreational opportunities within its jurisdiction. The City of Edmonds Park Recreation and Open Space Plan identifies 9 neighborhood parks (24.85 acres),2 Community Parks (58.10 acres), 6 Regional Parks (17.05 acres), 15 Special Use Parks (19.77 acres), and 12 Open Space sites (69.21 acres). b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. There are numerous buildings through the City of Edmonds that are over 45 years. The City of Edmonds has a local historic register with 20 sites on the register. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None known. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Edmonds is served by a series of state and local roads. SR 104 runs from the east at Interstate 5 through the southern part of Edmonds, ending at the State of Washington Ferry Terminal. SR 524 begins in Lynnwood at Interstate 5 and runs west through the center of Edmonds from the crest ofthe hill and down into the city center. Local roads provide access throughout Edmonds. These roads provide access for Community Transit, the commuter bus service for South Snohomish County. Commuter Park and Ride lots are located throughout Edmonds and are served by Community Transit bus service. Q SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 15 Packet Pg. 368 7.19.g The rail lines along the Edmonds' shoreline are primarily used by BNSF for freight service, but also provide Amtrak passenger train service through Edmonds. Sound Transit provides daily commuter service to and from Seattle. Washington State Ferries operates ferry service from Edmonds to Kingston providing access to the Olympic Peninsula. This is one of the busiest commuter ferry terminals in Puget Sound, as well as one of the major access points from the east side of Puget Sound to the west. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The City of Edmonds is served by Community Transit bus service, Washington State ferries, Sound Transit commuter rail and Amtrak passenger train service. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: .r N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. s x w 15. Public Services m E a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Q No. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 15 Packet Pg. 369 7.19.g b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other The City of Edmonds is served by all the utilities identified above. While a few septic systems may still be in service in Edmonds, that vast majority of the City's residences are connected to a sanitary sewer system. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A - The proposal is a non -project, non -site -specific action that would take effect City-wide. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Name of signee Eric Engmann, AICP Position and Agency/Organization Senior Planner, City of Edmonds Date Submitted: 9/13/2021 D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-duction, storage, or W release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? r� The proposal would not directly increase discharges to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of .r s toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. The code amendment does not increase the number of housing x w units that will be built, it only removes calculations that put limits on unrelated people living in a household. }; c m All development and redevelopment within the City of Edmonds would be subject to applicable local, state and z federal regulatory requirements, including building code, fire code, and storm water, in addition to the provisions of critical area regulations (where applicable). Q Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 13 of 15 Packet Pg. 370 7.19.g The City has a variety of environmental policies and regulations governing these potential impacts, including SEPA, critical areas, Shorelines, and public works standards. Specific projects, whether public or private, must comply with the applicable environmental regulations and review processes. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment would have a neutral to positive affect on plants, animals, fish, and marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: The City has a variety of environmental policies and regulations governing these potential impacts, including SEPA, critical areas, Shorelines, and public works standards. Specific projects, whether public or private, must comply with the applicable environmental regulations and review processes. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment will not deplete energy or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The City has a variety of environmental policies and regulations governing these potential impacts, including SEPA, critical areas, Shorelines, and public works standards. Specific projects, whether public or private, must comply with the applicable environmental regulations and review processes. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed code amendment will not likely use or affect environmentally sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: The City has a variety of environmental policies and regulations governing these potential impacts, including SEPA, critical areas, Shorelines, and public works standards. Specific projects, whether public or private, must comply with the applicable environmental regulations and review processes. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed code amendment will not likely affect land and shoreline uses. It will not allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The City has adopted a Shoreline Master Plan (SMP) that guides development within shoreline jurisdiction. The SMP allows most uses that are allowed by the underlying zoning provided they are developed consistent with the SMP's development standards. The SMP would not allow any new uses in the shoreline that are not currently allowed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Q SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 14 of 15 Packet Pg. 371 7.19.g The proposed amendment will not likely increase transportation demand. It will simply reevaluate the definition of a family and how it operates. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The City has adopted a Transportation Plan and follows all regulations to address transportation, public services, and utilities within the City. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. This proposed code amendment will not likely conflict with laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any new development will be subject to all applicable laws and regulations to protect the environment. None of the provisions of this code amendment would allow a development to avoid or reduce environmental regulations. Q SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 15 of 15 Packet Pg. 372 7.19.h Councilmember Chen agreed with Councilmember K. Johnson about including verbal and written comments as well as the council's input. He preferred to have staff and the consultant compile the amendments and bring it back to council. That would be less time consuming, less costly and more transparent. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis agreed it would be best if Ms. Feser worked with the consultant. She asked if the amendments would include the addition of an implementation chapter. Many people have repeated themselves weekly so in her opinion staff has enough information. She observed the survey is one component of the PROS Plan; the reason so many environmental and nearshore estuary issues were raised was because that was not addressed in the survey. She wanted to ensure there was an implementation chapter to assist with grant writing, noting the City just received over $20 million for Highway 99. She summarized it will be an open and transparent process, and no one's comments will be diluted. Council is available to help and she preferred the traditional method. With regard to comments after the public outreach process, Councilmember L. Johnson said the majority of those comments have been provided at council meetings or emailed. Not everyone is comfortable attending meetings or organized enough to submit their comments. If people still want to submit comments, she asked where they should be sent and what was the deadline. She asked if there would be any outreach for addition comments. Ms. Feser said there is a specific email for comments on the PROS Plan, prosplankEdmondswa.gov. A schedule will be established and distributed including the mailing list of individuals involved with the process who requested to be on a notification email list, the typical avenues such as social media as well as other avenues to get the word out. The council packet is available the Friday before council meetings which provides an opportunity for the public to review materials and comment via email to the council and/or staff or at council meetings, Part of reason the packets related to the PROS Plan have been so large is because all the comments have been included. That has been the practice and staff will continue collecting them up to the publication of the packet. Councilmember L. Johnson said it takes a certain amount of availability and know how to do this. Going out again and opening the opportunity for comment risks diluting the detailed, expansive and statistically significant outreach. She was hoping there was a good way to balance that with the comments that are still being submitted. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS, TO USE OPTION 2 THAT WAS PRESENTED THIS EVENING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Pro Tern Olson proposed a 5 minute break and to adjourn at 10:30 p.m. because the meeting started late. Mr. Taraday recommended a motion to extend before the break. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO EXTEND TO 10:30. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Pro Tem Olson declared a 5 minute recess at 9:55 p.m. 3. RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY CODE AMENDMENTS INTRODUCTION Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien reviewed: 0 Changing concept of Family o What is a family? ■ Changes across time and cultures ■ Traditionally two or more people related by blood and marriage Q Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes April 5, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 373 7.19.h ■ Modern families include single parent households, foster families, same -sex couples, child free families and many variations of the traditional norms ■ Some people do not grow up with the family of orientation but become part of a stepfamily or blended family ■ Updated definitions of family provide a more realistic and inclusive definition of family SB 5235 0 2021 State Legislation Z o Prohibits local governments from limiting the number of unrelated persons occupying a home o Exceptions for short-term rentals, Building Code occupancy loads, some group homes E o Also addressed owner occupancy requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units (Governor Vetoed Section) E Conflicting Edmonds Community Development Code o Definition of Family -ECDC 21.30.010 0 A. Family means individuals consisting of two or more persons related by genetics, v adoption, or marriage, or a group of five or fewer persons who are not related by U genetics, adoption, or marriage and none of whom are wards of the court unless such n wards are related by genetics, adoption, or marriage to all of the members of such group living in a dwelling unit. 0 D. Calculation of Residents 1. When one or more unrelated persons reside with a family whose members are related by genetics, adoption or marriage, the total number of residents shall not exceed five a persons except as provided in subsection (D)(2) of this section. a� 2. A family unit consisting entirely of persons related by genetics, adoption or marriage may rent a room to a total of two additional renters, or up to two students as a part of n a recognized foreign exchange program Proposed Code Amendments w o Removes Residential Occupancy Limits per State Legislation o Strengthens Structural / Element requirements for Single Family Dwellings (One Water, Gas 3 and Electric Meter ... Common Access to Rooms) o Maintains Limits on Number of Dwellings in Single Family Zoning - o Maintains Restrictions on Group Homes c o Definition of Family - 21.30.010 v ■ Removes occupancy limitation Family means individuals related or unrelated by v geneties, adoption, or- gr-attp of five or- fewer- per -sons who are not related N 0 N wafds are mla4ed by >adeption, 49 living in a dwelling unit. ■ Removed subsection to calculate occupancy limits (Sub D) a ■ Maintains subsections on Group Living (Sub B) and Exclusions from Family Definition 60 (Sub C) Maintains provisions limiting rental of ADU to either primary house or ADU z ■ Maintains provision allowing normal hosting activities (guests and visitors) w o Dwelling Unit Definitions c ■ 21.90.080 Single-family dwelling unit - Strengthens and adds criteria for definition - Maintains requirement for one family and one dwelling unit per lot - Adds requirement to: Q • Be limited to one mailbox, water meter, gas meter and electric meter (Properties with an approved ADU may have an additional mailbox) Have common access to common use of all living, kitchen, and eating areas Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes April 5, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 374 7.19.h ■ 21.20.050 Dwelling unit - Strengthens and aligns better with State's definition - Add portion that state it includes permanent provisions ,for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. o Chapter 20.21 ECDC - ADU ■ 20.21.030 Criteria for attached accessory dwelling units. D. Add one gas meter and provision for an addition mailbox F. Occupancy - Removes occupancy limits and exceptions for nurses and caregivers - Maintains owner occupancy requirements ■ 20.21.020 Density limitation -Limitation on the total occupancy o Removes reference to the exceptions listed in 20.21.030 o Maintains the density limits for ADUs Next Steps o Public hearing o Adoption following public hearing Councilmember Tibbott said the planning board had this discussion when he was on the board ages ago. He recalled the same question, what is a family, and was glad that finally some changes have been made and he was not surprised this was coming to council at this point. He asked if a single family residence with two kitchens with people living on multiple floors was still a single family residence. Mr. Lien said two kitchens in houses is becoming more common, particularly in larger houses. The question is whether they are two separate living areas or if there is common access to the areas. As long as there is common access throughout the house, it is still single family. Councilmember Tibbott asked about a locked door between the first and second floors. Mr. Lien said then it would not have common access and it was not single family. Councilmember Paine said she encountered the definition of family in an HOA code, relaying her understanding this would not affect HOAs in the community. Mr. Lien answered this change applied to how family is defined in the City code and zoning code. CC&RS could have additional restrictions about who is allowed to live in homes, but that is not affected by this. Councilmember Chen said this may sound funny but it is a serious question. The language does not exclude animals and he asked if dogs or cats were considered family. Mr. Lien said other sections of the code limit the number of domestic animals; he recalled five domestic animals were allowed in single family zones. While many people think of their pets as family, they are not included in this definition. Councilmember L. Johnson assumed the reason for doing this was to not be discriminatory regarding what defines a family. If that was the case, she asked why the City would allow HOAs to be ° Q discriminatory regarding what defines a family. That has been done in the past and she questioned why 66 the City would allow it to continue. Mr. Lien referred to senior living 55 and older communities that can be located in single family zones but have private restrictions on residents. There are a lot of CC&RS in the City, the City is involved with compliance with zoning; if they are more restrictive, they are enforced w by the HOA. m City Attorney Jeff Taraday said the legislature clearly told cities what they cannot do but did not take the z next step to regarding how HOAs define a family. One is a regulation of a private entity and the other is what a city does with its police power. The question is whether the city can use its police power to do Q what the legislature did not do, prohibit that type of private regulation through an HOA. He would need research that if it was something the council was interested in pursuing. In general, the City does not place restrictions on what HOAs can do via their neighborhood restrictions. The City has laws that apply Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes April 5, 2022 Page 23 Packet Pg. 375 7.19.h citywide but do not generally target HOA with special focus. That was not to say that the City can't, but he was not certain. Councilmember L. Johnson said it deserves more thought; in the past HOAs have discriminated based on race, gender, etc. and there is a reason the state did this. She acknowledged there were certain things the City would not want to tell HOAs that they could/could not do, but if an HOA allowed a family of 3-4 related people but not 3-4 unrelated people, that could be discriminatory. She reiterated there is a reason the state did this and it was worth additional conversation. Mayor Pro Tem Olson asked if having a public hearing needed to be voted on by council. Mr. Lien said code amendments require a public hearing and the date needs to provide enough time for notice. He can work with Mayor Pro Tem Olson on the schedule. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY CODE AMENDMENTS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS AND AMENDMENTS TO ECC TITLE 4 LICENSES Mayor Pro Tem Olson requested City Clerk Scott Passey provide an quick introduction, noting there have been some emails submitted with questions. Mr. Passey said he had more than a couple minute of introduction. There is a lot of information and he did not want to give this item short shrift because it has been in the works for literally years. This proposal was developed prior to COVID and then the idea of special events became rather superfluous given other priorities that arose. He introduced this to the PSPP committee last September and they recommended a presentation to full council. He explained the City has administered a special event permit program for many years, however, there is no adopted City code that outlines the process or criteria governing the issuance of special event permits. Mr. Passey continued, the intent of this proposal is to codify the process for permitting special events that impact City right-of-way, public property and other facilities or services. These special events enhance the community and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of venues for expression and entertainment that are not normally provided as part of government services. A new chapter is proposed to Title 4, Chapter 4.100, special event permits, that will provide a clear and efficient process for permitting special events within the City. Mr. Passey said he has a lot more information. Mayor Pro Tem Olson said she want to have this introduced and encouraged councilmembers to review the information and contact Mr. Passey with any questions so when it comes back, the council is prepared to take action or not. Councilmember Paine suggested scheduling this sooner rather than later as it has been on the schedule for some time. She noted there may be time on April 26t1'. There are a lot of summer events, and it would be helpful to have this codified and announced in advance. Mayor Pro Tem Olson shared that prioritization and assured it would be scheduled as soon as possible. 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS Mayor Pro Tem Olson felt strongly she needed to make this statement based on repetitive comments by the audience regarding the use of the hybrid option. "This city council voted unanimously to conduct our meetings in a hybrid format. This had something to do with continuing uncertainties related to COVID and something to do with feeling that hybrid is the way of future and that we may as well just get on Q Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes April 5, 2022 Page 24 Packet Pg. 376 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Public Hearing on the 2023-2028 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 10, 2022, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee. Staff Recommendation After the presentation a public hearing will be held. Narrative The Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a transportation planning document that identifies funded, partially funded, and unfunded projects that are planned or needed over the next six calendar years. The TIP also identifies the expenditures and secured or reasonably expected revenues for each of the projects included in the TIP. The City practice in preparing the TIP each year has been to keep it financially constrained the first 3 years (2023-2025), but not the last 3 years (2026-2028). RCW 35.77.010 requires each city to update and adopt their TIP prior to July 1st. A copy of the adopted TIP will be submitted to Puget Sound Regional Council, Washington State Department of Transportation, and adjacent jurisdictions after City Council approval. Some of the projects in the TIP are shown as funded through secured or unsecured Federal/State grants, as well as from the local funds. Due to a shortfall in transportation funding, a number of unsecured State and Federal transportation grants have been programmed to fund projects beginning in 2026. Most transportation grants are competitive, and the success of how many grants are secured in the future will depend on other transportation needs and funding requests in the region. Projects not identified in this document may not be eligible for Federal/State funding. Attachments: Attachment 1 - 2023-2028 TIP Presentation Attachment 2 - 2023-2028 TIP Packet Pg. 377 �i O� Inc 1890 PUBLIC HEARING 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program (2023-2028 TIP) May 17, 2022 Bertrand Hauss, PE Transportation Engineer Introduction Construction Projects in 2022 Scheduled Construction projects (2023 / 2024) Other Projects Identified in Recently Secured Grants /Submitted Grants Public Hearing /Questions Introduction Inc 103 • Revised Code of Washington (RCW) requires that each city update their TIP by July 1st • Document contains all significant transportation project that a City possibly plans to undertake in the next six years. • City of Edmonds policy: TIP financially constrained first years • Federal Grants, State Grants, and Local funds are programmed as revenue source for TIP projects. Construction Projects in 2022 Annual Street Preservation Program (Protect #1 Project Details Inc 103 • Approximately 6.8 lane miles of variable depth overlay along local streets throughout the City • 8 curb ramps upgrades (completed by City crews for 2023 Overlays) MTM'_[1 M • Construction Funding Spring/Summer 20 • Local funds • Utility Funds • Annual Funding Goal $1,500,000 7 $90,000 $2,000,000 per yea 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to OVD (Protect #2) Project Description • Overlay with ADA curb ramp upgrades • Addition of northbound bike lane City of Lynnwood funding east side of corridor MI - S-MIZ • Design • Construction Funding 2021-2022 2022 • Local Funds • Secured Federal grant • City of Lynnwood $320,000 $710,000 $905,000 SR-99 Revitalization & GatewaV Project — Stage 2 (Project # 9) Inc 103 Project Description • Installation of landscaped raised median along entire corridor from 244th St. SW to 210th St. SW with 130 trees • HAWK signal N 600' north of 234th St. SW • Gateway signs on both ends of corridor Schedule Construction Funding • Design 2020-2022 • Connecting Washington $8,2191( • Construction 2022-2023 • Local funds $270,00 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project Description Completion of Citywide pedestrian crossing enhancements a 2 locations in 2022 (7 others completed in 2020/2021) E n Schedule HAWK signal (SR-524 @ 84th Ave. W) Fully actuated traffic signal (SR-104 @ • Design • ROW • Construction Funding 232nd St. SW) April 2018 — November 2020 April 2019 —April 2020 March 2021— Early 2022 • Secured Federal Grant • Local funds • Utility funds $115761000 $6631000 $51,000 2022 Traffic Calmin Project Description • Installation of traffic calming devices along certain stretches (based on evaluation results) Schedule • Construction Funding • Local funds yr Fall 2022 $70,000 TM Scheduled Construction Projects in 2023/2024 Main St. Overlay from 6t" Ave. to 9t" Ave. Inc 103 Project #3' Project Details • Overlay with ADA curb ramps upgrades • Pedestrian Improvements at Main @ 8th Ave. Crossing Schedule Funding • Design 2023 • Local Funds $187,00 • Construction 2024 • Secured Federal grant $750,00 .4n�rwwwwq i pr....._ F,' A' 8.1.a Inc ;•1 a� X_ CO CO 228th St. SW to 1 0 N M N O JI .2 1 mile , r _ !v cash 4xs 9T l;. Tr. sT MN N 1/2 mile 8F t e t 3 d 1 fA mile § d Pna Gdg. Edmonds "° =c 00 iYA19ly� rdns�i = N .0 c Downtown %dPrk ti Ce n1:: r and PX4 Edmonds M 45 r N ........ i111 -4-, Ia11 Jdm..cL", des., N 2�rTr d + aT yr, i i 1l1.11�19� 1lll. 1 li St e—b7 Hkb— o PO* r �11111. Nestgat& Aixed UseVIM M Q .Yndan , . 9N r' Kz y• Firdole Village +'z-Ba;ingQl hrk 'r •� MixEii� Packet Pg. 387 Elm Wav Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S (Protect #24) Project Description • Identified as Short Walkway #6 in 2015 Transportation Plan • Complete missing sidewalk links (N 700' new sidewalk on south side of street) • ADA curb ramp upgrades with stormwater upgrades • Project to be combined with Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project Schedule • Design • Construction f 2021-2022 2023 Funding • Local funds Stormwater funds (Fund 422) $716,000 $366,000 Other Projects in 2023-2028 TIP �� Inc 103 A. Corridor Improvements • 228th St. SW from Highway 99 to 95th PI. W (Project #14) 2026-2028 • SR-99 Revitalization from 220th to 224th Stage 4 (Project #10) 2022-2027 • SR-99 Revitalization from 244th to 238th Stage 3 (Project #11) 2022-2026 • SR-99 Revitalization from 216th to 212th Stage 5 (Project #12) 2026-2028 • SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th to 226th (Project #17) 2022-2026 B. Pavement Preservation • Olympic View Dr. Overlay from 196th to Talbot (Project #4) 2025-2026 C. Signal Upgrades • Puget Dr. @ OVD (Project #6) 2026-2027 • 238th St. SW @ 100th Ave. W (Project #7) 2026-2027 • Main St. @ 3rd Ave. (Project # 8) 2027-2028 D. Intersection Improvements • 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW (Project #12) • 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W (Project #14) • Main St. @ 9th Ave. (Project #15) • SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W (Project #22) • SR-104 @ 238th St. SW (Project # W-t 10; arm", -l" El� mi Inc 103 2021-2027 2026-2028 2026-2027 2026-2027 E. Active Transportation Projects • 4th Ave. Corridor Enhancement Walkway (Project #34) • SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Transp. Impr. (Project #36) • SR-104 @ 100th St. Bike Improvements (Project #41) • SR-104 / Pine St. Sidewalk (Project #39) • Walkway projects within proximity to schools / parks o Maplewood Dr. Walkway (Project #23) 0 80th Ave. Walkway from 212nd St. SW to 206th St. SW (Proj. #25) 0 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St to OVD(Proj. #26) 0 95th PI. W Walkway from 224th to 220th (Project # 27) %�A" Inc 103 2026-2028 2026-2027 2026-2028 2026-2028 2026- 2028 2026-2028 2026-2027 2026-2027 8.1.a Project Name Citywide Bicycle Improvements 76t" Ave. W Overlay from 196t" to OVD Main St. Overlay from 6th to 8tn [1 Grant Program Sound Transit STP Federal STP Federal 1 Phase Amount Secured Design / Construction $1,850,000 Design / Construction $710,000 Design / Construction $750,000 ;•1 c`aN a� X_ U) O N O N M N CD Award Dat( a November'* '19 N N O N November `19 U a December '20 Packet Pg. 392 8.1.a Project Name Grant Program Phase Amount Secured 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. CMAQ / STP SW Intersection Design / ROW $1,089,500 Federal Improvements SR-104 ITS Adaptive CMAQ Federal Design $354,560 System UHwy 99 Revitalization from 220th St. SW to STP Federal Design $1,580,000 224th St. SW Hwy 99 Revitalization State Funds Design / ROW / from 244th St. SW to (throughConstruction for $16,500,000 210th St. SW Connecting Specific Stages WA) Hwy 99 Revitalization State Funds Design / ROW / from 244th St. SW to (through Move Construction for $22,500,000 210th ST. SW Ahead WA) Specific Stages ;•1 c`a a� x co Award Date N 0 N - - November `19 M N 0 December '20 December '20 a co N 0 N April `21 . N U April '19 a E a April '22 Packet Pg. 393 1 TOTAL SECURED TRANSPORTATION GRANTS 1APPROPRIATIONS OVER LAST 4 YEARS $451500'll000 8.1 .a Grant application submitted / to be submitted Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 4 OVD Overlay SR-104 @ 76th Intersection Bicycle Improvements SR-104 @ 100th Ave. Bicycle Improvements Maplewood Dr Wawlkay from Main ST to 200th St 95th PI. W Walkway from 224th tn 220th 80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th to 208th SR-104 Adaptive System (Infrastructure Bill) Amount requested / to be requested $2,650,000 $750,000 TBD (>$1,000,000) TBD (>$1,000,000) $1,500,000 $461,000 $1,536,000 lM Design + Construction Design + ROW + Construction Design + ROW + Construction Design + Construction Design + Construction Design + Construction Construction Grant Submittal Date 04/22 04/22 06/22 06/22 06/22 06/22 06/22 Fall 2022 Respo y Dat� N 0 06/2 N N 06/2 s 07/2 Cn a a 07/2 co cm N M N O N 07/2 E 07/2 CU Q w a TB[ Packet Pg. 395 Inc 103 PUBLIC HEARING / QUESTIONS City of Edmonds Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2023-2028) 8.1.b Grant Opportunity Project (2023-2028) Project Name Purpose Phase(s) Total Cost Source(s) 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 New Projects not in 2022-2027 TIP New Projects (not in 2022-2027 TIP) & recently submitted / up -coming rant application Recently submitted / upcoming grant application submittal (previously identified in TIP) Secured grant funding shown in last ear's TIP Recently secured Grant Preservation/Maintenance Projects: 1. Annual Street Preservation Program Grind pavement, overlay, chip seal, and slurry seal Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $750,000 (Federal, unsecured) (Fund 125, Fund 126) Local, unidentified $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 $100,000 $1,500,000 $1,900,000 $650,000 $1,500,000 $2,200,000 $9,000,000 $5,800,000 2. 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. Grind pavement, overlay the west side of 76th Ave. W. Lynnwood will be completing the east side of the street within their jurisdiction). Secured Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $7,000 (Federal, secured) (State) Local, General Fund $7,000 $3,000 $0 $3,000 3. Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 8th Ave. Grind pavement, 2" overlay, and curb ramps upgrades Secured grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $750,000 (Federal, secured) (State) Local, General Fund $126,000 $31,000 $624,000 1 $156,000 $0 $187,000 4. Olympic View Dr. Overlay from 196th St. SW to Talbot Rd Grind pavement, overlay curb ramps uprades, and vaned grates catch basin grate upgrades Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction Engineering & Construction $750,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local, General Fund $100,000 $100,000 $650,000 $650,000 $0 $750,000 5. Citywide Signal Improvements Upgrade traffic signal cabinets and improve technology Local Funds $0 (Federal) (State) Local, unidentified $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $0 $300,000 6. Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades Upgrade traffic signal Possible grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $283,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $43,000 $43,000 $240,000 $240,000 $0 $283,000 7. 100th Ave. W @ 238th St. SW Signal Upgrades Rebuild traffic signal system with new signal mast arms and new vehicle detection Possible Grant Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (State, unsecured) Local $160,000 $750,000 $910,000 $0 8. Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades Upgrade traffic signal Possible grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $344,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $53,000 $53,000 $291,000 $80,000 $0 $133,000 TOTAL $1,697,000 $2,310,000 $1,730,000 $4,816,000 $4,906,000 $4,791,000 Safety / Capacity Projects: 9. SR-99 Revitalization & Gateway Project Stage 2 out of total of 9 Stages along Hwy 99 Install raised median along the entire corridor in order to improve corridor safety (restrict left turns to / from two-way left turn onto private driveways), a HAWK signal, and Gateway Features Secured Grant & Local Funds Design, ROW, & COnstruction $0 (Federal) (State, secured) Local $250,000 $250,000 $0 10. SR-99 Revitalization Project (from 244th St. SW to 238th St. SW) Stage 3 (out of total of 9 Stages along Hwy 99) Installation of planter strip, lighting upgradesm utility upgrades, and capacity imprpvements at Hwy 99 @ 238th St SW (additional northbound left turn lane). Secured Grant, Possible Grant, & Local Funds Design, ROW, and Construction $0 (Federal) (Federal, unsecured) (State, secured) (State, unsecured) Local $1,500,000 $2,500,000 $915,000 $7,600,000 $22,500,000 $7,600,000 $27,415,000 $0 $0 11. SR-99 Revitalization Project from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW Stage 4 (out of total of 9 Stages of Hwy 99) Installation of planter strip, lighting upgrades, utility upgrades, and capacity imprpvements at Hwy 99 @ 220th St SW (additional nothbound / southbound left turn lane & westbound right turn lane Secured Grant, Possible Grant, & Local Funds Design, ROW, and Construction $1,323,000 (Federal, secured) Federal, unsecured (State, secured) (Local, unidentified) Fund 125, Fund 126 $245,000 $170,000 $85,000 $490,000 $340,000 $170,000 $490,000 $1,017,019 $664,400 $1,645,600 $98,000 $2,648,000 $34,000 $951,200 $68,000 $13,500,000 $13,000,000 $17,165,019 $1,208,400 $13,951,200 $1,968,600 12. SR-99 Revitalization Project from 216h St. SW to 212th St. SW Stage 5 out of total of 9 Stages along Hwy 99 Installation of planter strip, lighting upgradesm utility upgrades, and capacity imprpvements at Hwy 99 @ 212th St SW add left turn / bike lane for northbound and southbound movements). Possible Grant & Local Funds Design, ROW, and Construction $3,950,000 (Federa, unsecured) (State) Local $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000 $1,450,000 $0 $3,950,000 13. 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements Re -design intersection to reduce intersection delay and improve level of service (LOS). Various utility improvements are also included in the project. Secured Grant, Possible Grant, & Local Funds Design, ROW, & Construction $3,633,000 (Federal, unsecured) (Federal,secured) (Local, Fund 421) (Local, Fund 422) Local $351,000 $15,000 $25,000 $74,000 $351,000 $5,000 $5,000 $74,000 $184,000 $183,500 $184,000 $183,500 $3,633,000 $567,000 $1,070,000 $20,000 $30,000 $1,082,000 14. 228th St. SW Corridor improvements from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W Widen roadway to add two-way left turn lane along stretch or left turn lanes at specific intersections. Install sidewalk and bike lanes. Possible grant Engineering, ROW, & Construction $0 (Federal) (Sound Transit, unsecured) Local $2,862,000 $6,360,000 $6,360,000 $15,582,000 $0 15. SR 524 (196th St. SW) @ 88th Ave W. Intersection Improvements Design intersection improvements and addition of guardrail on the west side of intersection due to 12' vertical drop (grade. adjustment to improve sight distance to be considered). Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering $0 (Federal) (State, unsecured) Local, traffic impact fees $160,000 $95,000 $160,000 $95,000 ROW acquisition ROW $0 (Federal) (State, unsecured) Local $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 Complete intersection improvements Construction $765,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $765,000 $0 $0 to L O a C E O O Q E C O R L O Q to C R H L tQ d X_ fn 00 N 0 N M N O N a_ H 00 N 0 N M N O N N C M E L v Q r C d E t t� Q Page 1 Packet Pg. 3 7 City of Edmonds Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2023-2028) 8.1.b Project Name Purpose Grant Opportunity Project Phase(s) (2023-2028) Total Cost Source(s) 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 16. Main St. @ 9th Ave. Installation of traffic signal or mini -roundabout. Possible grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $625,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local, Traffic Impact Fees $95,000 $95,000 $530,000 $530,000 $0 $625,000 17. SR-104 ITS Adaptive System Install ITS Adaptive System along SR-104 from 95th PI W to 226th St. SW Secured Grants, Possible Grants, & Local Funds Engineering, ROW, & Construction $173,000 (Federal, secured) (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $173,000 $27,000 $1,700,000 $265,000 $1,700,000 $0 $310,000 18. SR-104 @ 226th St. SW/ 15th St. SW Intersection Improvements Extend SR-104 Westbound left turn lane and complete bicycle improvements with traffic signal improvements. Possible Grants & Local Funds Engineering, & Construction $231,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $21,000 $21,000 $210,000 $0 $21,000 19 Westgate / SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W Intersection Access Management Provide safety improvements within proximity to the intersection by providing better access management on all approaches Possible Grants & Local Funds Engineering, & Construction $610,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $610,000 $140,000 $0 $140,000 20 SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W Intersection Improvements Provide C-Curb with left turn channelization for access management. Possible Grants & Local Funds Engineering, & Construction $221,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $35,000 $6,000 $186,000 $35,000 $0 $41,000 21. SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements Install traffic signal and other intersection improvements. Possible Grants & Local Funds Engineering, ROW, & Construction $1,230,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $185,000 $29,000 $1,045,000 $165,000 $0 $194,000 TOTAL $2, 915,000 $3,935, 000 $5, 099,519 $43, 543, 700 $41,823, 000 $10,235, 000 Pedestrian Projects: 22. Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S Install sidewalk on south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S Possible Grant Engineering, & Construction $0 (Federal) (State, unsecured) Local $281,000 $281,000 $0 23. Maplewood Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW Install sidewalk on Maplewood St. from Main St. to 200th St. SW, creating connection to Maplewood Elementary and Yost Park. Possible Grant Engineering & Construction $1,908,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $159,000 $159,000 $1,590,000 $0 $0 24. Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S Install sidewalk on Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S, creating connections to Westgate and Sherwood Elementary Schools. Local funds Only Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (State) (Local, Fund 112) Local, Fund 422 $551,880 $349,900 $0 $551,880 $349,900 25. 80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW Install sidewalk on 80th Ave. W from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW, creating connections to Chase Lake and College Place Elementary Schools. Possible Grant Engineering & Construction $1,536,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $106,000 $117,000 $1,313,000 $0 $0 26. 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. Install sidewalk on Both Ave. W from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. creating connections to Seaview Elementary School. Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $1,597,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local, Fund 422 $335,000 $133,000 $1,262,000 $535,000 $0 $668,000 27. 95th PI. SW Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW [!M Install sidewalk on 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW = to improve pedestrian safety. Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (State, unsecured) Local $106,000 $21,000 $355,000 $355,000 $461,000 $376,000 28. 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104 Install sidewalk on one side of 232nd St. SW Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $901,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $138,000 $138,000 $763,000 $763,000 $0 $901,000 29. 236th St. SW Walkway from SR-104 to 97th Pl. W Provide sidewalk on one side of 236th St. SW Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $964,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $143,000 $143,000 $821,000 $821,000 $0 $964,000 30 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW Provide sidewalk on one side of 84th Ave. W Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $420,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $80,000 $80,000 $340,000 $340,000 $0 $420,000 31. 2nd Ave. S Walkway from James St. to Main St. Provide sidewalk along short missing link. Local Funds Only Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (State) Local $42,000 $0 $42,000 32. 218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W Install sidewalk along missing link Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $843,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $128,000 $128,000 $715,000 $715,000 $0 $843,000 33. 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W Install 300' sidewalk on the north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $160,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $160,000 $53,000 $0 $53,000 34. 4th Ave. Corridor Enhancements Walkway Create corridor improvements to encourage pedestrian activity along 4th Ave. N from Main St. to 3rd Ave. N from Downtown retail to Edmonds Center for the Arts Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $8,000,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 35. ADA Curb Ramps Improvements Construct Citywide ADA compliant curb ramps where facilities don't exist nor meet current standards / PW concrete crews upgrade curb ramp upgrades on annual program / also included as part of Capital Projects Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (State, unsecured) Local, General Fund $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $0 36. SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -motorized Transportation Improvements Install ADA curb ramps, extend bike lanes,and complete signal modifications in order to improve non -motorized transportation safety. Traffic signal owned by Shoreline. Possible Grant & Local Funds Engineering, ROW, and Construction $0 (Federal) (State, unsecured) Local $253,000 $1,272,000 $1,525,000 $0 37. Pedestrian Safety Program Complete pedestrian safety improvements at pedestrian crossings Engineering $0 (Federal) R L O a C d E O O Q E C O r R r L O Q y C R i H L tQ tv X_ 00 N 0 N M N 0 N a_ H 00 N 0 N M N O N N C G1 E L v M Q r C d E t 0 M Q Page 2 Packet Pg. 3 8771 City of Edmonds Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2023-2028) 8.1.b Project Name Purpose Grant Opportunity Project Phase(s) (2023-2028) Total Cost Source(s) 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 such as RRFB's, Flashing LED's at stop signs, and signage. Local funds & Construction $0 (State, unsecured) Local, unidentified $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $120,000 38. Downtown Lighting Improvements Install additional street lights on both sides of Dayton St. (cobra heads combined with pedestrian lights) and other locations within proximity to Edmonds Transit Station. Possible Grant Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (Sound Transit, unsecured) Local $318,000 $1,272,000 $1,500,000 $0 39. SR-104 /Pine St Walkway: SR-104 from mid -block crossing - 400' north of Pine St. to Pine St. and Pine St. from SR-104 to 9th Ave. S Complete sidewalk missing links to improve pedestrian safety and connectivity to Edmonds Transit Station. Possible Grant Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (Sound Transit, unsecured) Local $265,000 $265,000 $2,650,000 $3,180,000 $0 40. Citywide Bicycle Improvements Install bike lanes along 100th Ave.W I9th Ave. W from 244th St. SW to Walnut St., Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W, and 228th St. SW from 78th Ave. W to 80th Ave. W. Secured Grant Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (Sound Transit, secured) Local $1,500,000 $273,000 $1,500,000 $273,000 41. SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W Bicycle Improvements Extension of bike lanes for the southbound movement on north and south side of intersection along 100th Ave. W (bike lanes to be extended from what proposed as part of Citywide Bicycle Improvementsproject) Possible Grant Engineering, ROW, and Construction $1,550,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $200,000 $250,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 TOTAL $2,694,780 $20,000 $1,020,000 $4,198,000 $14,966,000 $9,029,000 Traffic Calming / Non -motorized Transportation Safety Projects: 42. Traffic Calming Program / Non -Motorized Transportation Safety Traffic circles, speed cushions, radar feedback signs, bulb -outs, etc. Local Funds only Engineering & Construction $0 (Federal) (State) Local, Fund 125 & Fund 126 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $0 $108,000 Ferry I Waterfront Projects 43. Ferry Storage Improvements from Dayton St. to Pine St. Provide additional ferry storage area closer to the Ferry Terminal (through striping revisions I C-Curb addition...). Possible Grant Engineering & Construction $357,000 (Federal, unsecured) (State) Local $357,000 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $357,000 $0 $0 i rarric riammng t-roieccs: 44. Citywide ADA Transition Plan Complete an compliance evaluation of all existing ADA curb ramps, as well as long range plan on how to address those defficiencies. Local Funds Only Engineering & Planning $0 (Federal) (State) Local, General Funds $150,000 $150,000 $0 $300,000 45. Pavement Rating Study Analyse the pavement condition of all arterial, collector, and local streets to determine the stretches to be repaved as part of future annual overlays. Local Funds Only Planning $0 (Federal) (State) Local / General Funds $45,000 $45,000 $0 $0 49. Transportation Plan Update Update Transportation Plan (current Plan was completed in 2015) Local Funds Only Engineering & Planning $0 (Federal) (State) Local $150,000 $0 $150,000 TOTAL $300,000 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $195,000 Total $162,121,999 Total Federal Total Federal (Secured) Total Federal (Unsecured Total State Total State (Secured) Total State (Unsecured) Sound Transit (secured / unsecured Total Local Fund Total Local (Fund 112) Total Local (Fund 125 / Fund 126) Toal Local (Fund 421) Total Local (Fund 422) Total Local (Fund 423) Total Local (Traffic Impact Fees) Total Local (General Fund) Total Local (unidentified) $7,624,780 $902,000 $902,000 $0 $1,920,000 $1,920,000 $0 $1,500,000 $2,768,900 $524,000 $1,603,000 $15,000 $374,900 $0 $0 $184,000 $68,000 $6,283,000 $1,465,000 $1,465,000 $0 $2,840,000 $2,840,000 $0 $0 $1,996,000 $74,000 $1,688,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $156,000 $68,000 $7,912,519 $2,791,019 $674,000 $2,117,019 $1,579,400 $1,579,400 $0 $0 $3,560,100 $183,500 $3,163,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $68,000 $52,932,700 $17,888,000 $282,000 $17,606,000 $23,635,000 $22,534,000 $1,101,000 $3,445,000 $7,823,700 $2,505,500 $1,586,000 $0 $133,000 $0 $190,000 $650,000 $2,759,200 $61,713,000 $29,523,000 $0 $29,523,000 $1,365,000 $0 $1,365,000 $7,897,000 $21,569,000 $3,978,000 $1,518,000 $0 $535,000 $0 $530,000 $0 $15,008,000 $24,268,000 $8,847,000 $0 $8,847,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $9,010,000 $7,029,000 $3,008,000 $1,518,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $195,000 $2,308,000 IL _ H 00 N O N M N O N N C G1 L v Q r C d t t,1 Q Page 3 Packet Pg. 399 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Proposed Ordinance Adding New Chapter, Chapter 5.70 entitled "Unlawful Occupation of Public Property' to the City Code Staff Lead: Patricia Taraday, City Attorney, Lighthouse Law Group PLLC Department: City Attorney's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History This agenda item had been brought forward to Council for consideration on April 26, 2022, May 3rd and May 5th*. The ordinance reflects the most recent amendments that have been approved by Council. Staff Recommendation Adopt Ordinance No. XXXX, adding a new Chapter 5.70 entitled "Unlawful Occupation of Public Property" to the City Code. Narrative The ordinance makes it clear that it is unlawful for anyone to occupy, or store personal property, on public property overnight. Enforcement is suspended against those individuals experiencing homelessness when no available shelter exists. If available shelter exists, it is required to be offered, along with other available human services, to the individual(s) experiencing homelessness. Only if the shelter is available, offered and then refused can the ordinance be enforced against those experiencing homelessness. An amendment to the ordinance was made redefining the term "available shelter." For a shelter to be considered "available" under this ordinance it must now be within a 35-mile radius of Edmonds City Hall. In terms of penalties, the ordinance makes it a misdemeanor to occupy, or store personal property, on public property overnight with a maximum fine up to $1000 and up to 90 days in jail. An amendment was proposed to make the first offense a $25.00 maximum penalty. The proposed amendment did not pass. With respect to fines, it was also clarified that the ordinance provides that before a court can impose any fine, the court must inquire as to a person's ability to pay. If a person is not able to pay the fine, the court can waive all fines and impose community service or work crew in lieu thereof. Attachments: * The minutes of the Council discussion of this agenda item on April 26th, May 3rd and May 5th can be found in the consent agenda section of this packet. Attachments: Unlawful Occupation of Public Property Ordinance as Amended 20220505 Packet Pg. 400 9.1.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, CHAPTER 5.70, TO THE EDMONDS CITY CODE ENTITLED "UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY" WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XI, Section I I of the Washington Constitution and RCW 35A.11.020, the City of Edmonds is authorized to regulate public property; and WHEREAS, public property is intended to be used by the public for public purposes, including daily City operations, park recreational use, pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular transportation and other public uses; and WHEREAS, there is an awareness that when the unhoused population does not have available overnight shelter, public property can be unavailable to the general public for its intended purposes; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has expanded its human services by adding a component of human services to the Deputy Parks and Recreation Director position and by growing its partnerships with local non-profit organizations for the purpose of improving the coordination of existing services, including programs specifically related to improving the lives of the unhoused residents of the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds authorized the creation of a task force to analyze the complex issues related to the unhoused residents of the City and the task force overwhelmingly supports and prioritizes the offering of human services, including available shelter, to the unhoused Packet Pg. 401 9.1.a residents of the City as part of the provision of wrap -around services necessary to support the City's unhoused residents; and WHEREAS, in Martin v. City of Boise, 920 F.3d 584 (9th Cir. 2019), the Night Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits cities from enforcing ordinances criminalizing camping on public property when there is no available shelter; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance makes it unlawful to occupy and store personal property on public property overnight, but suspends enforcement against those experiencing homelessness if overnight shelter is not available; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the regulatory requirements within this ordinance are necessary to promote public health, safety and welfare by preserving public use of public spaces for which they are intended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new chapter of the Edmonds City Code, chapter 5.70, entitled "Unlawful Occupation of Public Property" is hereby added to read as set forth in Attachment A hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Packet Pg. 402 9.1.a Section 2. Documentation and implementation. The implementation of this ordinance shall be applied to any individuals who occppy public property illegally. The offer of assistance, including food and available shelter shall be documented. Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance. APPROVED: MAYOR MICHAEL NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Im JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: Packet Pg. 403 9.1.a PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. a� c c O a� a 0 L a. c.i a. 4- 0 Q c.i c.i O 4- 3 0 c Lo O 0 N N O N N C N E a N R N V C m C L O L Q 0 L a. m a 4- 0 c 0 :r 0 Q. O 3 3 0 c c m E z u 0 r Q Packet Pg. 404 9.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, CHAPTER 5.70, TO THE EDMONDS MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY" The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 405 9.1.a ATTACHMENT A Chapter 5.70 UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY Sections 5.70.010 Purpose 5.70.020 Definitions 5.70.030 Unlawful occupation of public property 5.70.040 Unlawful storage of personal property on public property 5.70.050 Enforcement 5.70.060 Rules 5.70.070 Penalty for Violations 5.70.010 Purpose It is the purpose of this chapter to promote public health, safety, and welfare by preserving public use of public spaces for which they are intended. 5.70.020 Definitions "Available overnight shelter" means a public or private facility, with an available overnight space, open to person(s) experiencing homelessness at no charge, must be located within a 35-mile radius with the starting point of Edmonds Cites and to which the city facilitates transport. "Occupy" means to evidence an intent to remain in a place, at least overnight. Intent can be evidenced by setting up tents, shelter, or bedding, for example. "Personal property" means an item(s) recognizable as belonging to a person, has apparent utility or value in its current condition, and is not hazardous. "Public property" means all parks, streets, rights -of -way, sidewalks and any other property of which the City has a property interest. Packet Pg. 406 9.1.a "Store" means to put aside or accumulate for use when needed, to put for safekeeping, or to place or leave in a location. 5.70.030 Unlawful occupation of public property Unless caused by city action, or otherwise authorized by city code, city contract or permit, it shall be unlawful for any person to occupy public property. 5.70.040 Unlawful storage of personal property on public property A. Unless caused by city action, or otherwise authorized by city code, city contract or permit, it shall be unlawful for any person to store personal property on public property overnight. B. Removal of personal property. The City may remove unlawfully stored personal property after the city provides necessary notice and an opportunity to be heard. The City shall facilitate the storage of personal property if required by law. 5.70.050 Enforcement The City shall not enforce the provisions of 5.70.030 or 5.70.040 against persons experiencing homelessness if there is no available overnight shelter that can be utilized by that particular person. If available overnight shelter is available, the shelter space must be offered to the person(s) experiencing homelessness, along with other available human services. Only if the shelter space is refused, can the provisions of 5.70.030 and 5.70.040 be enforced against persons experiencing homelessness. 5.70.060 Rules The chief of police is hereby authorized to adopt rules, regulations, administrative policies, and procedures for implementing the provisions of this chapter. 5.70.070 Penalty for violations A. Violation of any of the provisions of this chapter is a misdemeanor, and shall be punished as follows: 1. First Offense. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction of such violation, be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. 2. Second Offense. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter, upon conviction of such violation, a second time within a five-year period shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. One Packet Pg. 407 9.1.a hundred dollars of the fine and one day of imprisonment shall not be suspended or deferred. 3. Third or Subsequent Offense. Every person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter, upon conviction of such violation, a third or more times within a five- year period shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Five hundred dollars of the fine and five days imprisonment shall not be suspended or deferred. 4. Prior to imposing any fine for violation of this chapter, the court shall make an inquiry as to a person's ability to pay. If a person is unable to pay the monetary penalty set forth in subsections (1), (2) or (3) of this section, the court is explicitly authorized to order performance of community service or work crew in lieu of a monetary penalty. Packet Pg. 408 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/17/2022 Special Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Title 4 Licenses Staff Lead: City Clerk Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History The City of Edmonds has administered a special event permit program for many years, although there is no adopted city code outlining the process or criteria governing the issuance of special event permits. This proposal was presented in the Public Safety, Personnel and Planning Committee on September 14, 2021. The Committee recommended that it be presented to the full council and a future meeting. This item was subsequently introduced at the March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting. Staff Recommendation Consideration of an ordinance codifying the special event permit program in the Edmonds City Code (ECC) and amending various code provisions in ECC Title 4 Licenses. Passage of a resolution adopting a new City Fee Schedule to add fees relating to special event permits. Narrative It is the purpose of the City to establish a formal process for permitting special events that impact city right-of-way, public property and other facilities or services. It is recognized that these special events enhance the City of Edmonds community and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of venues for expression and entertainment that are not normally provided as a part of governmental services. Staff is proposing a new chapter to Title 4 to be known as Chapter 4.100 (Special Event Permits) to provide a clear and efficient process for permitting special events within the City. This Chapter is intended to supplement land use and street right-of-way regulations, to provide a coordinated process for the regulation of certain activities to be conducted in conjunction with special events, and to ensure that the impacts of the special event do not unduly impact the public's health, safety or welfare. It is further intended to protect and preserve public infrastructure and city resources, prevent unplanned disruption of public services, mitigate impacts to the extent feasible and to create a mechanism for cost recovery without having an adverse effect on those events that contribute to the community. In addition to adding a new Special Events section, some sections of Title 4 are proposed for repeal and others have been refined to reflect that licenses are reviewed through the business license application process. There are also changes to ECC 4.72 Business Licenses to reflect the city's partnership with the State of Washington Department of Licensing. Finally, Chapter 4.98 Constitutionally Protected Events, has been updated to address the need for flexibility regarding certain constitutionally protected spontaneous demonstrations. Packet Pg. 409 9.2 If the Council adopts the new special event permit code, staff recommends adoption of a resolution adding permit fees to the City's Fee Schedule, consistent with the policy of recovering costs associated with reviewing and issuing city permits. Attachments: Draft Special Events Permits Code Draft Ordinance Amending Title 4 ECC Licenses Resolution amending Fee Schedule related to Special Event Permits PSPP091421 Packet Pg. 410 9.2.a Special Events Permits Code 4.100.010 Purpose. 4.100.020 Definitions. 4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events. 4.100.040 Permit applications. 4.100.050 Indemnification. 4.100.060 Insurance. 4.100.070 Permit decision. 4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision. 4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events. 4.100.100 Cleanup deposit. 4.100.110 Suspension and revocation. 4.100.120 Exercise of police power. 4.100.130 Violation — Penalties. 4.100.010 Purpose. It is the purpose of the City to establish a process for permitting special events that impact city right-of- way, public property and other facilities or services. It is recognized that these special events enhance the City of Edmonds community and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of venues for expression and entertainment that are not normally provided as a part of governmental services. This Chapter is intended to supplement land use and street right-of-way regulations, to provide a coordinated process for the regulation of certain activities to be conducted in conjunction with special events, and to ensure that the impacts of the special event do not unduly impact the public's health, safety or welfare. It is further intended to protect and preserve public infrastructure and city resources, prevent unplanned disruption of public services, mitigate impacts to the extent feasible and to create a mechanism for cost recovery without having an adverse effect on those events that contribute to the community. 4.100.020 Definitions. A. "City sponsored event" means a special event for which the city provides some level of sponsorship and/or support to the primary event organizer/sponsor through the use of city funds, equipment, and/or other city resources that is not a "city contracted event." City sponsored events may also be special events that are organized and sponsored in full by the City of Edmonds. Reimbursement for city resources may be required. B. "City contracted event" means a special event that typically takes places on an ongoing annual basis and for which the City and the event organizer/sponsor enter into an event contract to apportion responsibility for the event, thereby eliminating the need for the event organizer/sponsor to obtain a special event permit under this Chapter. Such events may be sponsored in part by the city. Examples of city contracted events include the Garden Market/Summer Market, Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July celebration, Octoberfest, and Taste Edmonds. C. "Commercial special event" means an activity or occurrence sponsored and operated by one or more businesses that is conducted primarily for the exchange of goods or services for financial gain. Commercial special events typically occur upon private property. Examples of commercial special events include parking lot sales and tent sales, promotional events, and sidewalk sales. Packet Pg. 411 9.2.a D. "Emergency response plan" means a plan detailing the expected actions of event management and/or public safety agencies in the event or threat of an emergency. E. "Expressive event" or "Constitutionally protected event" means an activity or occurrence in which the sole or principal purpose is the expression, dissemination, or communication of political or religious opinion, views or ideas, and for which no fee or donation is charged or required as a condition of participation or attendance. Examples of expressive special events include political rallies, marches, public speeches, and political demonstrations. These events are regulated by Chapter 4.98. F. "Fire marshal" means the city of Edmonds fire marshal or designee. G. "Parade" means a type of special event involving an organized procession or march of more than 25 persons or 25 objects, or any combination thereof amounting to 25, that temporarily disrupts the general public's normal use of public streets or sidewalks. H. "Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, incorporated or unincorporated association, organization, or other entity or group of persons, however organized. I. "Private" or "private event" means an event where persons are specifically and individually invited. It does not include an event where tickets, invitations, or announcements are available to the public. J. "Public" or "public event" means a special event open to the public, and includes an event where tickets, invitations, or announcements are available to the public. K. "Public amusement" means circuses, carnivals, motion picture shows, exhibitions, concerts, side shows, plays and other stage shows, amusement parks and any other form of diversion, pastime or recreation conducted for and open to the public regardless of whether an admission fee or other charge is made for attendance; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require the licensing and inspection of an activity conducted under the auspices of a bona fide, accredited elementary school, middle school, high school or college and conducted on the premises thereof in facilities previously inspected and approved for public assembly. L. "Right-of-way" means, within the City of Edmonds, all public right-of-way and property granted or reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for street purposes, together with public property granted or reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for walkways, paths, trails, sidewalks, and bikeways, whether improved, unimproved, or unopened, including the air rights, sub -surface rights and easements related thereto, and over which the City of Edmonds has authority and control. M. "Run" or "race" means a type of special event involving any race, contest or event, whether of a competitive or a noncompetitive nature, involving a procession of persons, whether afoot or upon any vehicle or device propelled by the human body, including but not limited to marathons, fun runs, walkathons, and bicycle races. N. "Security" means employees, or other hired personnel, dedicated to maintaining order and ensuring compliance with the laws of the state of Washington and ordinances of the city of Edmonds. O. "Site" has the same meaning as set forth in ECDC 21.90.090, as now or hereafter amended, and in addition in the case of undeveloped property, a land area under common ownership, whether the land area is comprised of one lot, a combination of contiguous lots, or contiguous fractions of lots. P. "Special events" include any event which is to be conducted on public property or in a public right-of- way; and also, any event held on private property which would have a direct significant impact on: (a) Packet Pg. 412 9.2.a traffic circulation to and from the event over public streets or rights -of -way; (b) public streets or rights -of - way near the event, or (c) the need for city -provided emergency services, such as police, fire or medical aid, as determined by the city. It is presumed that any event on private property which involves: (i) an open invitation to the public to attend; or (b) anticipated attendance by private invitation of 100 or more people is an event that will have a direct significant impact on the public streets, rights -of -way or emergency services. Special events may include, but are not limited to: fun runs and walks, auctions, parades, carnivals, exhibitions, film/movie events, circuses, outdoor markets, and fairs. Q. "Tent" means a temporary membrane structure or shelter, such as pop-up canopies, sails, and the like, as defined in the current editions of the fire and building codes. 4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events. A. Permit Required. Any person desiring to conduct or operate a special event within the City of Edmonds shall first obtain a special event permit from the city, unless specifically exempt. It shall be unlawful for any person to sponsor or conduct an event or activity requiring a special event permit without a valid special event permit. Penalties for violation of the terms of this chapter shall be as specified by this chapter. B. Consistency with Permit and Law. A special event shall be conducted as described by the special event permit, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. C. Public and Personal Safety. The configuration and operation of special events shall conform to applicable laws and regulations, including provisions relating to emergency ingress and egress, barrier -free facilities, fire prevention, health and sanitation, and the operation of vehicles and equipment. D. Business Licenses and Taxes. As required by applicable law, special event businesses/vendors shall have City of Edmonds business licenses and shall record, report and remit taxes. E. Exemptions. The following activities and occurrences shall comply with applicable laws and regulations, but are exempt from the permit requirements of this chapter: 1. City contracted events. 2. Funerals and wedding processions. 3. Garage sales and rummage sales. 4. Neighborhood block parties. 5. Special event facilities. Events conducted at a facility designed for special event purposes or at facilities where such events are normally held, such as churches, event centers, convention centers, schools, athletic fields, auditoriums, stadiums, theaters, and the like. 6. Governmental activities. Activities conducted by a governmental agency acting within the scope of its authority. 7. Regularly scheduled events utilizing park and recreation facilities, in accordance with the intended use of the facility, and with park rules and policies. Packet Pg. 413 9.2.a 8. A privately scheduled, non -reoccurring event upon private property in a residential zone with up to 100 persons attending. 9. The temporary sale of seasonal goods when regulated by other statutes, such as Christmas tree sales, and peddling of farm produce. 10. Expressive events (but see Chapter 4.98 for regulations pertaining to expressive events). F. Signs. 1. With a special event permit application, applicants may request, and the appropriate director or designee that would otherwise authorize such signage may authorize, the use of temporary on -site (on -premises) and off -site (off -premises) signs. 2. Special event signs shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the sign. Signs shall not obstruct visibility for motorists and pedestrians, nor impede access to buildings or property. The installation of signs upon public property shall be subject to inspection by the building official and/or city engineer. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for installation, maintenance, and removal of all signs. 4.100.040 Permit applications. A. The administrative services director or designee is authorized to prepare and maintain necessary application forms and may issue written administrative policies and procedures as needed for the implementation of this chapter. B. Applications for special event permits shall be submitted to the administrative services director or designee, a minimum of 60 days prior to a small event (less than 100 people) and a minimum of 90 days prior to a major event (more than 100 people). If an event organizer fails to meet these timelines, the application may still be processed if all affected departments agree to process the application within the shortened timeframe. Factors in determining whether to allow for processing a late application will include the impact on city resources and rights -of -way, and conflicts with other already scheduled events. C. Applications for special event permits shall include written authorization of the property owner. For special events proposed upon city -owned property, the approval of a special event permit application shall constitute city authorization to conduct the event upon the property described in the permit application. D. Applications for special event permits shall be on forms prepared by the administrative services director or designee and shall include information that any city department processing the application deems necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare to enable it to review the application. The information requested shall enable the city to assess the scope of the event so as to evaluate the impact of the event on city resources and the community. E. Application fee(s) for special event permits are set forth in the City's adopted fee schedule. 4.100.050 Indemnification. Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant and authorized officer of the sponsoring organization must agree to reimburse the city for any costs incurred by it in repairing damage to city property and indemnify and defend the city, its officers, employees, and agents from all causes of Packet Pg. 414 9.2.a action, claims or liabilities occurring in connection with the permitted event, except those which occur due to the city's sole negligence. 4.100.060 Insurance. Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant shall comply with the following insurance requirements: (1) The permit applicant shall obtain commercial general liability insurance in amounts acceptable to the city attorney's office. (2) Written proof of such insurance is required prior to permit issuance. The insurance policy shall be written on an occurrence basis, shall name the city as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 26, or coverage at least as broad, and shall be written for a period that includes the timeframe for both the set-up before and the clean-up following the completion of the event. The applicant shall provide the city and all additional insureds for this event with written notice of any policy cancellation within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice. (3) Liquor Liability Coverage. Liquor liability coverage must be obtained when liquor is served as a part of a special event permitted under this chapter. (a) A vendor hired by the special event permittee to serve liquor must provide evidence of liquor liability coverage in amounts acceptable to the city attorney's office, naming the city as additional insured. This insurance coverage is in addition to the special event permittee's overall general liability requirement. (b) A special event permittee serving liquor directly shall obtain host liquor coverage as a part of providing commercial general liability insurance per subsection (1) of this section. 4.100.070 Permit decision. A. After receiving a completed application in conformance with this chapter, along with the non-refundable permit application fee, the administrative services director or designee shall consult with all affected divisions or departments, such as Building, Planning, Engineering, Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Finance, and Risk Management. Following consultation with all affected departments and divisions, the administrative services director or designee may approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application for a special event permit based upon the provisions of this chapter. When an application is conditionally approved or denied, the administrative services director or designee shall provide written explanation of the grounds for the conditions of approval or denial, and the applicant's right of appeal pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. B. Decision criteria. A permit may be issued to an applicant only if all the following criteria and conditions for issuance are met: 1. The special event will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; 2. The special event will not be injurious to property or improvements in the immediate vicinity of the special event; 3. The special event will not endanger participants, spectators, or the public; Packet Pg. 415 9.2.a 4. The special event has a traffic management plan or other adequate and appropriate measures in place to mitigate any traffic safety and mobility issues, including for both vehicles and pedestrians; 5. Adequate and appropriate sanitation and refuse facilities are planned; 6. The special event has adequate and appropriate measures in place to ensure the safe movement, assemblage and dispersion of people attending the event. Such measures may include the use of safety guardrails, fences, ropes, barricades, and the like; 7. The special event will not cause excessive or harmful fumes, odor, smoke, noise or light and must be consistent with Chapter 5.30 entitled "Noise Abatement and Control"; 8. The special event will provide for the appropriate collection and disposal of waste, recycling, and compostables; 9. Adequate plans exist to return the area or routes impacted by the special event to the same condition or cleanliness as existed prior to the event; 10. Applicant has agreed to the indemnity and hold harmless provisions in the application; 11. Applicant has provided proof of the requisite insurance provisions in the application; 12. For city sponsored events, applicant has agreed to reimburse the city for the provision of additional city services, including but not limited to the employment of police officers to direct or block pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or the provisions of standby aid car or fire protection services, as required. 4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision. Decisions of the administrative services director or designee are appealable. An appeal of the administrative services director or designee's decision related to application of this chapter may be filed with the administrative services director or designee within 10 business days of notification of the decision. Such appeal shall be filed and processed in accordance with the appeal provisions for business licenses as provided by Chapter 4.72. The appeal filing fee shall be as specified by the fee schedule. 4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events. A. Upon approval of a special event permit application for a city sponsored event, the administrative services director or designee shall provide the applicant with a statement of the estimated cost of providing city resources, such as personnel and equipment, for the special event, if applicable. The applicant/sponsor of the event may be required to prepay these estimated costs ten (10) days prior to the special event. The special event application fee per the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the city council is a separate processing fee and is not applicable to the city services fees. City resources may include the use of police officers and public employees for traffic and crowd control; pickup and delivery of traffic control devices, picnic tables, and the like; extraordinary street sweeping; and any other needed, requested or required city service, along with the cost of operating any equipment needed to provide such services. B. If the actual cost for the use of city resources on the date(s) of the city sponsored event is less than the estimated cost, the applicant/sponsor will be refunded the difference by the city in a timely manner. If the actual cost for the use of city resources on the date(s) of the city sponsored event is greater than the estimated Packet Pg. 416 9.2.a cost, the city will invoice the applicant/sponsor for the difference, and the invoice shall be paid in a timely manner. C. Permit fees and fees for the use of city resources may be waived in part or in full by the city if, in review of the application, it is found that the city sponsored event is of sufficient public benefit to warrant the expenditure of city funds without reimbursement by the applicant/sponsor and would not result in the private financial gain of any individual or "for -profit" entity. 4.100.100 Cleanup deposit. A. The applicant/sponsor of a special event likely to create a substantial need for cleanup may be required to provide a cleanup deposit prior to the issuance of a special event permit. B. The cleanup deposit may be returned after the event if the area used for the permitted event has been cleaned and restored to the same condition as existed prior to the event within twenty-four (24) hours after the conclusion of the event. C. If the property used for the event has not been properly cleaned or restored within twenty-four (24) hours after the conclusion of the event, the applicant/sponsor shall be invoiced for the actual cost to the city for cleanup and restoration, which invoice shall be paid in a timely manner. The cleanup deposit shall be applied toward the payment of the invoice. 4.100.110. Suspension and revocation. A. In instances in which the special event does not comply with the provisions of this chapter, the terms and conditions of the approved permit, or other applicable law, the administrative services director or designee may suspend or revoke an approved special event permit with the issuance of written findings. B. When necessary to prevent serious injury to persons, property or the public peace, health, safety or welfare, the administrative services director or designee, fire marshal, building official, development services director or chief of police, or the designee of each, may suspend or revoke an approved special event permit effective immediately. The city official or designee shall deliver written notice of suspension or revocation to the permit applicant/event sponsor or manager. 4.100.120 Exercise of police power. This chapter is enacted as an exercise of the city's police powers and shall not be construed to impose any duty owed by the city to any permittee under this chapter or to any member of the public, nor shall any permit be construed as waiver of any violation of the laws of the city. 4.100.130 Violation — Penalties. A. It shall be a misdemeanor for any person to violate any of the provisions of this chapter or the conditions imposed upon any permit issued hereunder, which shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or imprisonment not to exceed ninety (90) days. Each day, or part thereof, during which any such violations occur or are continued, shall constitute a separate offense. B. In addition, permits issued hereunder shall be subject to suspension or revocation as provided herein, and civil abatement proceedings as set forth in Chapter 20.110 ECDC. Packet Pg. 417 9.2.a C. In addition, or alternatively, any person violating the provisions of this chapter or the conditions of any permit issued hereunder shall also subject the permittee to a daily civil penalty in the amount specified by Chapter 20.110 ECDC. D. In addition, or alternatively, any person violating the provisions of the chapter or the conditions of any permit issued hereunder may forfeit their right to hold a special event in the city. Packet Pg. 418 9.2.b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF OR AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN CHAPTERS OF TITLE 4 ECC (LICENSES) AND FOR THE ADOPTION OF A NEW CHAPTER TO TITLE 4 ECC RELATING TO SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has determined that certain Chapters of Title 4 ECC (Licenses) are obsolete and are no longer required to be maintained in the code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain revisions to Chapters 4.12 (Peddlers, Solicitors and Street Vendors), 4.52 (Regulations for Adult Entertainment Facilities), 4.68 (Community Antenna Televisions Systems), 4.72 (Business License), 4.90 (Public Markets), and 4.98 (Constitutionally Protected Events) are needed to clarify City requirements, to reflect the repeal of other sections of Title 4, and to address the need for flexibility regarding certain constitutionally protected spontaneous demonstrations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a new chapter to Title 4 to be known as Chapter 4.100 (Special Event Permits) is needed to provide a clear and efficient process for permitting special events within the City for the benefit of its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following Chapters of Title 4 ECC (Licenses) are hereby repealed in their entirety: 4.11 (Motor Vehicle Wreckers); 4.22 (Malt Liquor by the Keg); 4.24 (Game Licenses); 4.32 (Public Amusements); 4.40 (Public Dances); 4.44 (Teen Dance Halls); 4.48 (Cabaret Dances); 4.50 (Licensing of Public Massage Parlors and Public Bathhouses); 4.56 (Sound Trucks); 4.60 (Taxicabs); 4.75 (Pawnbrokers); 4.80 (Aircraft Landing Permits); and 4.85 (Horse Taxis). Packet Pg. 419 9.2.b Section 2. Chapter 4.12 ECC (Peddlers, Solicitors and Street Vendors) is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfike thfough): 4.12.010 Definitions. A. "Solicitor" or "peddler" means any person who shall sell, offer for or expose for sale, or who shall trade, deal or traffic in any goods or services in the city by going from house to house or from place to place or by indiscriminately approaching individuals. 1. Sales by sample or for future delivery, and executory contracts of sale by solicitors or peddlers are included; provided, however, that this section shall not be deemed applicable to any salesman or canvasser who solicits trade from wholesale or retail dealers in the city. 2. Any person who, while selling or offering for sale any goods, services or anything of value, stands in a doorway, any unenclosed vacant lot, parcel of land, or in any other place not used by such person as a permanent place of business shall be deemed a solicitor or peddler within the meaning of this chapter, except as noted in subsection (B) of this section. B. "Street vendor" means any person who shall sell food, flowers, nonalcoholic beverages only, and/or other goods or services from either a motorized or nonmotorized mobile vending unit. C. "Motorized mobile vending unit" means a truck, van or other motorized vehicle that incorporates a kitchen or other food preparation area from which prepared or prepackaged food may be sold. D. "Nonmotorized mobile vending unit" means a cart, kiosk or other device capable of being pushed by one person, with at least two functional wheels and positive wheel -locking devices. 4.12.020 License required. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to act as solicitor, peddler or street vendor within the meaning and application of this chapter unless that person or his/her employer shall have first secured a Ci1y of Edmonds business license in manner- pr-evidedinthis ehapte�—The lieense required by as required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. 1. Any person who shall sell, deliver or peddle any dairy product, meat, poultry, eel, fish, mollusk, or shellfish must first obtain a license pursuant to this chapter. 2. No licenses shall be issued or maintained for the sale of poultry or poultry products or meat or meat products which are adulterated or distributed under unsanitary conditions. 3. No licenses shall be issued for the sale of shellfish unless the vendor can produce a certificate of compliance as required by RCW 69.30.020. B. All persons acting as a solicitor, peddler or street vendor shall comply with all laws, ordinances and regulations, including all Snohomish County health department requirements. Packet Pg. 420 9.2.b C. All solicitors, peddlers or street vendors must report any sales made within the city of Edmonds to the Department of Revenue as sales that have occurred within the city. The lieense fees for- selieiter-s, peddlers or- street Neader-s shall be as �911ews: I' .111r " 11 • �� All No AWN. !El�iLf!fs !!�!1fl4!• ems= w am N C d t� J N r+ F- LU O N r C 1v E C d E a to E L a) a c m w m a CO m to C d C� J <.i U W d r� H r� Q Packet Pg. 421 9.2.b be�ween the Edmonds the Por-t Edmonds the eity of or- of and another- entiVy, sUeh as aAs , FE)tn4h July fir-ewor-ks, Taste Edmonds, stimmer- maf4Eet, of par-ade and of a -ad elassie ear- show. C J N their- identifleation by r+ exempt stattis along with photo upon request a pr-OspeetiVe e:UstE)Mef H law enforcement officer; U W O N r health ,list.-i,.t 0 0 0 �.ts Gl C d 4.12.040 License applieation information required-. E a A. Any firm desiring to ) per -son, or other organization seeure a solicitor's, peddler's of , and stieh follows:1. c m The name, addfess and telephone number- of the pr-ineipal applieant, firm or- other- > organization; in the the the has the last two m a event 'applieant name or address of ehanged within yeafs,Coname .. and address ever- the last two year- period pr-eeeding the most r-eeefit; m N 3. The the to be by C natufe or- ehafaetef of goods, war -es, mefehandise of sefvi.ees offered eaeh- ipal C� ' .2 <.i 4. A list th U ef —inally eentempla4ing solieita4ion, peddling of street vending within- Wthe Edmonds, the information in this to eity of and r-eqttir-ed subseetion (B) of seetieft as eaeh, r� H5. The telephone home) the individual name, address and atimber- (btisiness and of aefing as For- 1e the Edmonds to eaeh pefson solieiting, peddling E)r- street vending wit -kin e4y of ptir-stia-at a L independent employee,B. ++ by the ..its, shall sot forth t -son the following: 0c1 provided and as each such per G t l�ev n o ��v�n }p�1 y ddress�eCV1 a Packet Pg. 422 9.2.b 2. The telephone the fifm holding name, address and number- o� per -son, or- other- or-ganiza4ion ipal 0 0. m the t.,. Vl 3 His or- her- age and gefiefal pe „1 ,lo.,,.Fiptioo o .-oa by e , C d t� J the e ty i the . f ,- an N plie.,tio ; H G U Sueh other- ifi f,,-.-.-.a4ion as r-easonably required by ,.;tom. ,. ffieials W O N baek-gr-otifid im,esfig4ion the Upon C of " ' Gl results of the investigation t the a ty elo -L. E C d D. if, the iwvestigation, the is found to have the E as a result of applieant not eommitted any of aets denial listed below, the the isso a requififig as eity elefk shall, ttpon payment of prescribed N Committed fraud • any act eonsisting of or misrepresentation; L w IL c o t f r e e; >W o been felony difeedy to- years, eonvieted of a misdemeanor- of felating e. , CO but not limited to, those misdefneafiefs and felonies iffi,olving moral , m C d C� 4. Been felony the type defined in t J ehafged with a misdemeanor- or- ef subseetien (D)(3) of tha4 is <.i seefien and 'pending;osition of e still U W 5. Been lieense the this that refused a under- previsions of ehapter-; pr-evided, , any denied license the this if the r� applicant a under provisions of chapter may reapply and when H reasons fer- denial no longer- ; an r E. Evefy peddler- shall be feqttir-ed to eaffy the peddler's lieense and display it along with ph F. The is to the O eity elerk authorized pr-emulga4e niles r-egafdifig manner and method of payment, ineltiding a prohibition or- r-egttl4ion of payment by and the fefm of the applieation. L ' • .050 • �c G t (i yr a Packet Pg. 423 9.2.b or stfeet 0 pr-eor-0 0s. 4.12.055 Street vendor requirements. Any person seeking a pem+k City of Edmonds business license for a street vendor license under the definition of this chapter shall comply with the following requirements: A. Mobile vending units may be allowed to operate within the following commercially zoned areas including unzoned property or right-of-way adjacent to or abutting commercially zoned areas: 1. Motorized and nonmotorized mobile vending units: neighborhood business (BN), community business (BC), planned business (BP), downtown business zones (BD I, BD2, BD3, BD4 and BD5), commercial waterfront (CW), general commercial (CG, CG2), Firdale Village mixed -use (FVMU), medical use (MU) and public use (P). B. In addition to the licensing requirements of this chapter, any street vendor shall be required to obtain a street use permit. Application fees for street use permits are those established by the city council by resolution in its sole legislative discretion. Application fees shall be paid to the city prior to issuance of any permit. C. All advertising shall be placed on the nonmotorized mobile vending unit and will not be allowed on the street or sidewalk. Maximum sign area allowed shall be 10 square feet. D. The vending site shall be kept clean and orderly at all times, and the vendor must provide a refuse container and is encouraged to provide containers for recycling. No portion of a vendor's inventory, sales equipment, or any other structure or equipment used in the sales or solicitation process shall be left overnight upon any unenclosed portion of any lot or site within the city, nor upon any public street or right-of-way. E. The city reserves the right to limit the number of vending permit sites in any given area of the city. When the number of permitted mobile vendors reaches 15, a review before the city council is triggered to determine if the number of mobile vendors should be limited. The city council review may consider the needs of the public, diversity of products offered for sale, the smooth flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, number of complaints, and locations where the vending units are located. F. If located on a sidewalk, a minimum clearance of five feet shall be maintained by any street vendor Packet Pg. 424 9.2.b G. Street vendors shall not locate within that portion of improved street right-of-way designed for vehicular traffic or parking. Street vendors seeking to locate in improved street rights -of -way or on sidewalks shall be oriented toward pedestrian traffic movement or safety. Any application to locate a street vendor in the street right-of-way shall require approval by the city traffic engineer and shall not interfere in any way with vehicular or pedestrian traffic or safety. H. No mechanical audio or noise making devices and no hawking is allowed. Hawking is the loud, repeated oral solicitation of business by the vendor or an assistant. I. Street vendors may operate in parks if they have a concession agreement with the city of Edmonds to operate on a specific park property. J. Street vendors are prohibited in residentially zoned areas, and unzoned property or right-of-way adjacent to or abutting the residentially zoned areas. K. All street vendors shall comply with all applicable Snohomish County health district requirements. L. The applicant shall submit with his application a copy of the written approval for the vending site from the property owner when locating on private property. When locating on a sidewalk within the right-of-way, the applicant shall have written approval for the vending site from the abutting property owner and/or tenant. In the event that the property owner or tenant shall disagree, the property owner's decision shall be final. 1. In the event that the proposed site is on or abuts property owned by the city of Edmonds, the applicant shall be required to obtain the city's approval. Approvals relating to park property shall be handled as a request to let a concession under the terms of this chapter. Request for sites abutting all other public land owned by the city shall be forwarded to the city council for their review and approval. 2. In the event that the proposed site is on or abuts publicly owned property not owned by the city of Edmonds, the applicant shall be required to obtain approval from the public entity that owns the property. 3. In the event that the site for which approval is sought abuts vacant land, the applicant shall make reasonable written attempts to secure the approval of the property owner. If the applicant is unable to do so, the city may accept written proof of such attempts and issue a conditional permit. If a complaint is later received from the owner of the land, the license shall be revoked. The granting of such a conditional license shall vest no right in the applicant. M. When locating within a parking lot of a private location, the applicant shall: 1. Identify the location the mobile vending unit will be located and provide a circulation plan. The location and circulation plan shall require approval by the city traffic engineer to ensure the vending unit will not interfere in any way with vehicular or pedestrian traffic or safety. 2. Demonstrate that the site will meet the parking requirements of Chapter 17.50 ECDC excluding the parking space(s) occupied by the mobile vending unit. Packet Pg. 425 9.2.b N. The maximum permissible size for any nonmotorized mobile vending unit shall be: 1. Thirty square feet for sidewalk locations; and 2. Fifty square feet for locations within the street or other public right-of-way or when located on private property. 3. In no event shall any nonmotorized mobile vending unit exceed 10 feet in length. O. During special events held within the city where food providers are required to pay a fee to participate (such as the Edmonds Art Festival and Taste of Edmonds), no mobile vending units may be allowed to operate within one -quarter mile of the special event. lop 4.12.065 Soliciting and peddling restrictions. All licenses issued pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to the following time and location restrictions: A. Fourth of July Fireworks Display. For the purpose of crowd and traffic control on the Fourth of July, all soliciting after 6:00 p.m. within one mile of the official fireworks display shall take place only within the confines of the fireworks viewing area as designated by the chief of police on the Civic Center playfield. B. No peddler or solicitor shall engage or attempt to engage in the business of peddling at any home, residence, apartment complex or business that prominently displays a "No Peddlers" or "No Solicitors" sign or any other similar sign that communicates the occupants' desire to not be contacted by peddlers. C. No peddler or solicitor shall engage in the business of peddling between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. D. Motorized and nonmotorized mobile vending units which are located directly adjacent to residentially zoned property may not operate between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Motorized and nonmotorized mobile vending units not located directly adjacent to residentially zoned property may not operate between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Packet Pg. 426 9.2.b 4.12.070 Carrying of license required. Stieh heense A City of Edmonds business license shall be carried at all times by each solicitor, peddler or street vendor for whom issued, when soliciting, canvassing or street vending in the city of Edmonds, and shall be exhibited by any such solicitor, peddler or street vendor whenever and wherever he or she shall be requested to do so by any police officer or any person solicited. soheitor, peddlef or- stfeet vendor- of any of the or-dinanees of the eity of Edmonds. The eity of - Edmonds may also r-&veke a heense fet: a st-Feet veader- under- the following eenditions: A. Failufe to eemply with the tefms of this ehaptef; A. Aqienever- the detefmines that thefe is for- denying heense city eler-k eadse any appheation keense using a4 least ene of the following fnetheds: (1) fegister-ed of the heensee. Netiee to the (2) eet4ified mail, r-etufa feeeipt the lieense be requested of (3) personal sef-,4ee on mailed deemed three days The the address on shall for- the deni r-eeeived after- mailing. notiee shall speeif� r-eveea4ien of ., 1: gr-otmds 6isi:if� - ••y:. D. The hearing shall be de neve. The eity eetineil may , e d cscisivrr. appropriate aefien in Snohomish Getnity s"er-ier- eetift within 14 days of the eity eetineil's deeision. Q Packet Pg. 427 9.2.b 4.12.090 Purchase orders — Form and content. All orders taken by licensed solicitors; or peddlers ^r street vend shall be in writing, in duplicate, stating the name as it appears on the license, the address of both the solicitor, peddler or street vendor and his or her employer, the terms thereof, and the amount paid in advance, and one copy shall be given to the purchaser. 4.12.100 Pe-nalties.Penalty for violation. Any per -son or- per -sons who violate or- fail to eemply with any of the pfevisions of this ehapter- shall npo�sen otioN of said violation be punished as providedinECC5.59 020. AU person, as defined herein, and the officers, directors, managing agents, or partners of anorporation, firm, partnership or other organization or business violating or failing to comply with any provisions of this chapter shall be . uilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine in any sum not exceeding $250.00 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding nine months, or both, and each day of violation shall constitute a separate offense. 4.12.110 Severability. Should any section, clause or provision of this chapter be declared by the courts to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the chapter as a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 3. Chapter 4.52 ECC (Regulations for Adult Entertainment Facilities), subsections .030, .060, .070, .080, .100, .110, .250 and .260, are hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike through): 4.52.030 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, certain terms and words are defined as follows: A. "Adult entertainment" shall mean: 1. Any exhibition, performance or dance of any type conducted in an adult entertainment facility where such exhibition, performance or dance involves a person who is unclothed or in such costume, attire or clothing as to expose any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola or any portion of the pubic region, anus, buttocks, vulva or genitals, or human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, or wearing any device or covering exposed to view which simulates the appearance of any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola or any portion of the pubic region, anus, buttocks, vulva or genitals, or human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered; or 2. Any exhibition, performance or dance of any type conducted in an adult entertainment facility where such exhibition, performance or dance is distinguished or characterized by a predominant emphasis on the depiction, description, simulation or relation to the following specified sexual activities: Packet Pg. 428 9.2.b a. Human genitals in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal; or b. Acts of human masturbation, sexual intercourse or sodomy; or c. Fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, anus, buttocks or female breast; or 3. Any exhibition, performance or dance intended to sexually stimulate any patron and conducted in an adult entertainment facility where such exhibition, performance or dance is performed for, arranged with or engaged in with fewer than all patrons in the adult entertainment facility at that time, with separate consideration paid, either directly or indirectly, for such performance, exhibition or dance. For purposes of example and not limitation, such exhibitions, performances or dances are commonly referred to as table dancing, couch dancing, taxi dancing, lap dancing, private dancing or straddle dancing. B. "Adult entertainment facilities" shall mean those businesses defined as follows: 1. "Adult arcade": a commercial establishment containing individual viewing areas or booths, where, for any form of consideration, including a membership fee, one or more still or motion picture projectors, slide projectors, or other similar image producing machines are used to show films, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides, or other photographic reproduction of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. 2. "Adult cabaret": a nightclub, bar, restaurant, theater or auditorium, or similar commercial establishment, whether or not alcoholic beverages are served, which features adult entertainment. 3. "Adult motel": a hotel, motel, or similar commercial establishment which: a. Offers sleeping accommodations to the public for any form of consideration and provides patrons with closed-circuit television transmissions, films, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides, or other photographic reproductions which are characterized by the depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas and are not rated G, PG, PG-13, NC-13, NC-17 or R by the Motion Picture Association of America; or the establishment has a sign visible from the public right-of-way which advertises the availability of this adult type of photographic reproductions; or b. Offers a sleeping room for rent for a rental fee period of time that is less than 10 hours; or c. Allows a tenant or occupant of a sleeping room to subrent the room for a period of time that is less than 10 hours. 4. "Adult motion picture theater": a commercial establishment or drive-in theater where films, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides, or similar photographic reproductions characterized by the depiction or description of specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities and are not rated G, PG, PG-13, NC-13, NC-17 or R by the Motion Picture Association of America and are shown for any form of consideration. Packet Pg. 429 9.2.b 5. "Other adult entertainment facility": any commercial establishment to which any patron is invited or admitted and where adult entertainment is provided on a regular basis and as a substantial part of the activities of the establishment. C. "Barker" shall mean any person who is located at the entrance of or outside of an adult entertainment facility, and attempts to solicit business for the same by using voice or gestures. D. "City" shall mean the city of Edmonds, Washington. E. "Director" shall mean the administrative services director e or his/her designee. F. "Employee" shall mean any and all persons, including managers, entertainers, independent contractors, renters, lessees, or sublessees, who work in or at or render any services directly related to the operation of any adult entertainment facility whether or not such person is paid compensation by the operator of said business. G. "Entertainer" shall mean any person who provides live adult entertainment in an adult entertainment facility, whether or not that person is an employee of the business and whether or not a fee is charged or accepted for such entertainment, and whether or not that person is nude, semi-nude or clothed. H. "Establishment" shall mean any of the following: 1. The opening or commencement of an adult entertainment facility as a new business; or 2. The conversion of an existing business, whether or not an adult entertainment facility, to an adult entertainment facility; or 3. The addition of an adult entertainment facility to any other existing adult entertainment facility; or 4. The relocation of any adult entertainment facility; or 5. An existing adult entertainment facility. I. "Expressive dance" shall mean any dance which, when considered in the context of the entire performance, constitutes an expression of art, theme, story or ideas, but excluding any dance such as, but not limited to, common barroom -type topless dancing which, when considered in the context of the entire performance, is presented primarily as a means of displaying nudity as a sales device or for other commercial exploitation without substantial expression of theme, story or ideas, and the conduct appeals to the prurient interest, depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way and lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. J. "Manager" shall mean any person who manages, directs, administers, or is in charge of, the affairs and/or the conduct of an adult entertainment facility. K. "Nude" or "state of nudity" shall mean the appearance or less than complete and opaque covering of the human anus, male genitals, female genitals, or the areola or nipple of the female breast. The Packet Pg. 430 9.2.b opaque covering shall be made of material or fabric, but shall not include any liquid substance, including mud, water, lotion, whipping cream, or other such substances that are easily broken down or removed and do not offer the covering intended for an "opaque covering." L. "Operator" shall mean the owner, significant stockholder or significant owner of interest, custodian, licensee, manager, or person in charge of any licensed adult entertainment facility. M. "Licensed establishment" shall mean any establishment that requires a license and that is classified as an adult entertainment facility. N. "Licensee" shall mean a person in whose name a license to operate an adult entertainment facility has been issued, as well as the individual listed as an applicant on the application for a license. O. "Person" shall mean and include any individual, firm, joint venture, partnership, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, business trust, receiver or any other group or combination acting as a unit. P. "Semi-nude" shall mean a state of undress in which clothing completely and opaquely covers only the genitals, pubic region, and areola and nipple of the female breast, as well as portions of the body covered by supporting straps or devices. Q. "Specified anatomical areas" shall mean and include any of the following: 1. Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, anus, or areola of the female breasts or any artificial depiction of the same; or 2. Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered. R. "Specified criminal activities" shall mean and include any conviction for acts which constitute sexual crimes against children, sexual abuse, rape, distribution of obscenity or erotic material to minors, prostitution, pandering, or racketeering. S. "Specified sexual activity" shall mean and include any of the following: 1. The fondling or other intentional touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttocks, anus, or female breasts; or 2. Sex acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including intercourse, oral copulation, or sodomy; or 3. Masturbation, actual or simulated; or 4. Human genitals or artificial depictions of the same in a state of sexual stimulation, arousal or tumescence; or 5. Excretory functions as part of or in connection with any of the activities set forth in subdivisions 1 through 4 of this subsection. Packet Pg. 431 9.2.b T. "Transfer of ownership or control" shall mean and include any of the following: 1. The sale, lease, or sublease of an adult entertainment facility, or substantially all of the assets of an adult entertainment facility; or 2. The transfer of securities which constitute a controlling interest in the adult entertainment facility, whether by sale, exchange, or similar means; or 3. The establishment of a trust, gift, or other similar legal device which transfers the ownership or control of the adult entertainment facility, except for transfer by bequest or other operation of law upon the death of a person possessing the ownership or control. 4.52.060 License required. A. It shall be unlawful to operate an adult entertainment facility without a valid adult entertainment facility license, issued by the city for the particular type of adult entertainment to be conducted. The license or licenses required under this chapter are in addition to a business license that may be required under Chapter 4.72 ECC. B. The administrative services director sty elerlf, or hiss designee, is responsible for granting, denying, revoking, renewing, suspending, and canceling adult entertainment facility licenses. The director of the department of planning or his/her designee is responsible for ascertaining whether a license application for a proposed adult entertainment facility complies with all requirements enumerated herein and all other applicable zoning laws and/or regulations. C. An application for an adult entertainment facility license shall be made on a form provided by the city. D. The completed application shall contain the following information and shall be accompanied by the following documents: 1. If the applicant is an individual/sole proprietor, then the individual/owner shall state his/her legal name and any aliases, stage names, or previous names, date of birth, Social Security number and submit satisfactory proof that he/she is 18 years of age or older. 2. If the applicant is a partnership, then the partnership shall state its complete name, and the legal names of all partners, including their dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and whether the partnership is general or limited, and a copy of the partnership agreement, if any. 3. If the applicant is a corporation, including a limited liability organization, then the corporation shall state its complete name, the date of its incorporation, evidence that the corporation is in good standing under the laws of the state of Washington, the legal names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers of all directors, or principal stockholders, and the capacity of all officers, directors and principal stockholders; the name of the registered corporate agent, and the address of the registered office for service of process. Packet Pg. 432 9.2.b 4. Each officer, director, or principal stockholder shall provide the administrative services director, or designee, eity e1ef 4 -easufeF with an affidavit attesting to his/her identity and relationship to the corporation. A principal stockholder shall mean those persons who own 10 percent or greater interest in the adult entertainment facility. 5. If the applicant or any other individual listed pursuant to subsection (D)(1), (2) or (3) has been convicted of a crime within a four-year period immediately preceding the date of the application, then the applicant must state the specific criminal act involved, the date of conviction and the place of conviction. 6. If the applicant or any other individual listed pursuant to this section has, within the last four years, had a previous permit or license under this chapter or other similar ordinances from another city or county denied, suspended, or revoked, then the applicant must state the name and location of the adult entertainment facility for which the permit or license was denied, suspended, or revoked, the entity denying the same, as well as the date of the denial, suspension, or revocation. 7. If the applicant or any other entity listed pursuant to this section holds any other licenses under this chapter or any other permits or licenses from other jurisdictions, including a sexually oriented business license from another city or county, then the applicant must state the names and locations of such other permitted or licensed businesses. 8. The single classification of license for which the applicant is filing. 9. The location of the proposed adult entertainment facility, including a legal description of the property, street address, and telephone number(s), if any. 10. The applicant's mailing address and residential address. 11. Two two-inch by two-inch color photographs of the applicant, including any corporate applicants, taken within six months of the date of the application, showing only the full face of the same. The photographs shall be provided at the applicant's expense. The license, when issued, shall have affixed to it one such photograph of the applicant. 12. The applicant and/or each corporate applicant's driver's license number, Social Security number, and his/her state or federally issued tax identification number, if any. 13. Each application shall be accompanied by a complete set of fingerprints of each person required to be a party to the application, including all corporate applicants as defined above, utilizing fingerprint forms as prescribed by the chief of police or homer designee. 14. A sketch or diagram showing the configuration of the adult entertainment facility, including a statement of total floor space occupied by the establishment. The sketch or diagram must be professionally prepared and accepted by the city, and it must be drawn to a designated scale or drawn with marked dimensions of the interior of the adult entertainment facility to an accuracy of plus or minus six inches. E. Applicants for a license under this chapter shall have a continuing duty to promptly supplement application information required in the event that said information changes in any way from what is Packet Pg. 433 9.2.b stated on the application. The failure to comply with said continuing duty within 30 days from the date of such change by supplementing the application on file with the administrative services director eil�- e er-k or homer designee shall be grounds for suspension of a license. F. In the event the administrative services director eity eleor her designee determines or learns at any time that the applicant has improperly completed the application for a proposed adult entertainment facility license, he/she shall promptly notify the applicant of such fact and allow the applicant 10 days to properly complete the application. (The time period for granting or denying a license shall be stayed during the period in which the applicant is allowed an opportunity to properly complete the application). G. The applicant must be qualified according to the provisions of this section, and the adult entertainment facility must be inspected and found to be in compliance with health, fire, and building codes of the city. H. The applicant shall pay a preliminary nonrefundable processing fee established by resolution at the time of filing an application under this section. Note: This is a processing fee. License fees shall also be required in the event the application is approved. I. The fact that a person possesses other types of state or city permits and/or licenses does not exempt him/her from the requirement of obtaining an adult entertainment facility license. J. The application form for licenses issued under this chapter shall contain a provision providing that under penalty of perjury the applicant verifies that the information contained therein is true to the best of his/her knowledge. 4.52.070 Investigation and application. A. Upon receipt of an application properly filed with the administrative services director e , and upon payment of the nonrefundable processing fee, the administrative services director e or his4ie designee shall immediately stamp the application as received and shall immediately thereafter send photocopies of the application to other city departments or other agencies responsible for enforcement of health, fire, criminal and building codes and laws. Each department or agency shall promptly conduct an investigation of the application and the proposed adult entertainment facility. Said investigation shall be completed within 20 days of receipt of the application by the administrative services director eity ele or maker designee, unless circumstances support extending the investigation. If the investigation is extended, the city shall inform the applicant of the extension and the reason. The extension shall be for no longer than 10 additional days from the original expiration of the 20-day time period stated above. At the conclusion of its investigation, each department or agency shall indicate on the photocopy of the application its recommendation as to approval or disapproval of the application, date it, sign it, and in the event it recommends disapproval, state the specific reasons therefor, citing applicable laws or regulations. B. A department or agency shall recommend disapproval of an application if it finds that the proposed adult entertainment facility will be in violation of any provision of any statute, code, ordinance, regulation, or other law in effect in the city, or if the applicant does not meet the conditions as specified in this chapter. After its indication of approval or disapproval, each department or agency shall immediately return the photocopy of the application to the administrative services director eit)- eler-k or his�her designee. Packet Pg. 434 9.2.b C. In addition to the license fees set forth in this chapter, an applicant shall pay a charge equal to the actual cost of fire inspection in accordance with the provisions of ECDC 19.25.025. 4.52.080 Issuance of license. A. The administrative services director eity ele or hs/her designee shall grant or deny an application for a license within 60 days from the date of its proper filing unless the city or applicant establishes a good reason for up to a 10-day extension as provided above. B. Grant of Application for License. 1. The administrative services director eity ele or his/he designee shall grant the application unless one or more of the criteria set forth in subsection C of this section (Denial of Application for License) is present. 2. The license, if granted, shall state on its face the name of the person or persons to whom it is granted, the expiration date, and the address of the adult entertainment facility. The license shall be posted in a conspicuous place, at or near the entrance to the adult entertainment facility so that it can be easily read at any time. The license shall be valid until the end of the year. C. Denial of Application for License. The administrative services director eity ele or his/her designee shall deny the application for any of the following reasons: 1. An applicant is under 18 years of age or will be employing a person under 18 years of age. 2. An applicant is overdue on his/her payment to the city of taxes, fees, fines, assessments, or penalties assessed or imposed against him/her in relation to an adult entertainment facility. 3. An applicant has failed to provide information required by this section or the application for the issuance of the license, or has falsely answered a question or request for information on the application form. 4. The applicant has failed to comply with any provision or requirement of this chapter. 5. The applicant has failed to comply with any city codes or zoning regulations, or other state or federal regulations or court order applicable to an adult entertainment facility. 6. The applicant has been convicted of a felony within the last 10 years involving an adult entertainment facility including, but not limited to, prostitution, promoting prostitution, and/or possession of controlled substances as that term is defined in Chapter 69.50 RCW. 4.52.100 Licenses for managers and entertainers. A. No person shall work as a manager or entertainer at any adult entertainment facility without having first obtained the appropriate entertainer's or manager's license from the administrative services director ei yLele. Each such applicant shall not be required to obtain an adult entertainment facility Packet Pg. 435 9.2.b license, but shall complete an application containing the information identified in ECC 4.52.060 (D) and comply with the same requirements and procedures as set forth in ECC 4.52.060 through 4.52.080. A nonrefundable processing fee established by resolution shall accompany the application. B. It is unlawful for any entertainer, employee or operator to knowingly work in or about or knowingly perform any service directly related to the operation of an unlicensed adult entertainment facility. C. The annual fee for such a license shall be established by resolution. The amount shall be used for the cost of administration and enforcement of this chapter. D. This license expires annually on December 31 st of each year and must be renewed by January 1 st of each year. This license shall not be prorated. E. The applicant must be 18 years of age or older. 4.52.110 Due date for license fees. All licenses required by this chapter must be issued and the applicable fees paid to the administrative services director eit-y eleat least 14 calendar days before commencing work at an adult entertainment facility, and on an annual basis as described above. 4.52.250 Record keeping requirements. A. Within 30 days following each calendar quarter, each adult entertainment facility licensee shall file with the administrative services director eity elerk a verified report showing the licensee's gross receipts and amounts paid to entertainers, models, or escorts, if applicable, for the preceding calendar year. B. Each adult entertainment facility licensee shall maintain and retain for a period of two years from the date of termination of employment, the names, addresses, Social Security numbers and ages of all persons employed or otherwise retained as entertainers, models, and escorts by the licensee. 4.52.260 Denial, suspension or revocation of license, and appeal procedures. A. When the administrative services director perk refuses to grant a license, or revokes the same, he/she shall notify the applicant in writing of the same, describing the reasons therefor, and shall inform the applicant of his right to appeal to the city council within 10 days of the date of the written notice by filing a written notice of appeal with the administrative services director eity elek containing a statement of the specific reasons for the appeal and a statement of the relief requested. B. Whenever the administrative services director eity elek has found or determined that any violation of this chapter has occurred, he/she shall issue a notice of violation and suspension or revocation ("notice") to the licensee. In addition, the administrative services director eity elerlf shall issue a notice of suspension or revocation to the licensee under the following circumstances: 1. Where such license was obtained by fraud or false representation of fact; Packet Pg. 436 9.2.b 2. For the violation of, or failure to comply with, the provisions of this chapter or any other similar local or state law by the licensee or by any of its agents, employees or representatives, when the licensee knew or should have known of the violations committed by its agents, employees or representatives; 3. For the conviction of the licensee of any crime or offense committed at the adult entertainment facility involving prostitution, promoting prostitution or transactions involving controlled substances (as that term is defined in Chapter 69.50 RCW), or the conviction of the licensee's employees, agents or representatives of any crime or offense committed at the adult entertainment facility involving prostitution, or transactions involving controlled substances (as that term is defined in Chapter 69.50 RCW). C. The notice shall include the following: 1. Name(s) of person(s) involved. 2. Description of the violation(s), including date and section of this chapter violated. 3. Description of the administrative action taken. 4. Rights of appeal as set forth above. D. The notice shall be served either personally or by mailing a copy of the notice by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the licensee at his or her last known address. Proof of service shall be made at the time of service by a written declaration under penalty of perjury, executed by the person effecting the service, declaring the time, date, and the manner by which service was made. The decision may be appealed to the city council if request for appeal is properly filed with the administrative services director ewewithin 10 calendar days of receipt of the notice. Said request shall be in writing, state specific reasons for the appeal, and the relief requested. E. The suspension or revocation of a license shall be effective at the end of the expiration of any appeal period, unless there is a written request for an appeal properly filed by the licensee. If there is an appeal so requested, then the revocation or suspension shall be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. This effective date of suspension shall not apply to any fire code violation or building code violation deemed by the appropriate officials to be a serious risk to health and welfare. F. Within 10 working days of receiving a timely appeal, the administrative services director eity eler shall forward the administrative record of the licensing decision to the city council. G. When an applicant has appealed the administrative services director e decision according to the stipulations herein, the city council shall review the administrative record as soon as possible, but no later than 30 working days after the city receives the appeal. Written notice of the date, time, and place of the scheduled meeting will be given to the applicant by the administrative services director eity ele by mailing the same, postage prepaid, to the applicant at the address shown on the license application, at least five days prior to the meeting. H. If the licensee appeals the notice to the city council, the licensee shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard as to the violation and action taken. The licensee and administrative services director eity elerlf or designee his e„resenta* shall be given an opportunity to argue the merits of Packet Pg. 437 9.2.b the appeal before the city council. Oral argument by each party shall not exceed 10 minutes and shall be limited to the administrative record before the council. I. The city council shall uphold the administrative services director's e s decision unless it finds the decision is not supported by evidence in the administrative record. J. The city council shall issue a written decision within 10 working days of hearing the appeal. The council may uphold the administrative services director's e4 elerk's decision and deny the license, overrule the administrative services director's "c's decision and issue the license, or remand the matter to the administrative services director eivy ele for further review and action. The administrative services director city cle shall complete further action or review within 30 working days of receiving any remand. K. A decision by the city council shall constitute final administrative review. The applicant or licensee shall be responsible for the cost of any preparation of the record for appeal. L. Either party may seek judicial review of a final decision of the city council as provided by law. Section 4. Chapter 4.68 (Community Antenna Television Systems), subsections .050, .290, .390, and .400, are hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike through): 4.68.050 Acceptance. No franchise granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall become effective unless and until the ordinance granting same has become effective. Within 30 days after the effective date of the ordinance awarding a franchise, or within such extended period of time as the council in its discretion may authorize, a franchisee shall file with the administrative services director eity elerl£ its written acceptance of the franchise, in a form satisfactory to the city attorney, together with the bond and insurance policies required by ECC 4.68.330, Insurance, and 4.68.340, Performance bond. 4.68.290 Removal and abandonment of property of franchisee. The city may direct a franchisee to temporarily disconnect or bypass any equipment of a franchisee in order to complete street construction or modification, install and remove underground utilities, or for other reasons of public safety and efficient operation of the city. Such removal, relocation or other requirement shall be at the sole expense of a franchisee. In the event that the use of any part of the cable system is discontinued for any reason for a continuous period of 12 months, or in the event such system or property has been installed in any street or public place without complying with the requirements of the franchise or other city ordinances or the franchise has been terminated, cancelled or has expired, a franchisee shall promptly, upon being given 10 days' notice, remove within 90 days from the streets or public places all such property and poles of Packet Pg. 438 9.2.b such system other than any which the city may permit to be abandoned in place which permission shall not be unreasonably withheld. In the event of such removal, a franchisee shall promptly restore the street or other areas from which such property has been removed to a condition reasonably satisfactory to the city. Any property of a franchisee remaining in place 90 days after the termination or expiration of the franchise shall be considered permanently abandoned unless the franchisee has commenced removal within a reasonable time. Any property of a franchisee to be abandoned in place shall be abandoned in such manner as the city shall prescribe. Upon permanent abandonment of the property of a franchisee in place, the property shall become that of the city, and a franchisee shall submit to the administrative services director eity- e4erk an instrument in writing, to be approved by the city attorney, transferring to the city the ownership of such property. None of the foregoing affects or limits franchisee's rights to compensation for an involuntary abandonment of its property under state or federal law. 4.68.390 Expedited review process — Competitive franchises. In accordance with the competitive franchise rule adopted pursuant to Part 76 of Title 47 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 76.41, a process for expedited review of franchise applications for a competitive franchise is hereby established. A. Application of Rule. Any application for a cable franchise agreement submitted pursuant to 47 CFR Section 76.41 to the city shall contain the requisite information set forth herein. The mayor and staff shall evaluate the application and make recommendations to the Edmonds city council based on the criteria set forth herein. B. Definitions. As used in this local rule, definitions shall be as follows: 1. "Affiliated entity" or "affiliate" means any entity having ownership or control in common with the grantee, in whole or in part, including, without limitation, grantee's parent corporations and any subsidiaries or affiliates of such parent corporations. 2. "CFAR franchise applicant" or "applicant" means an applicant for a cable franchise pursuant to the provisions of the competitive franchise application rule (CFAR) set forth in Part 76 of 47 CFR Section 76.41, and includes the parent corporation, its subsidiaries and principals. 3. "City" means the city of Edmonds. 4. "Control" is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised. 5. "Interest" includes officers, directors and shareholders owning five percent or more of the CFAR franchise applicant's outstanding stock or any equivalent voting interest of a partnership or joint venture. Packet Pg. 439 9.2.b 6. "Model cable franchise template" means this chapter, containing standard franchise terms and conditions for cable franchises granted in the city, as the same exists or is hereafter amended through a process that wi44 commenced in 2008. Franchises granted under the then -existing Chapter 4.68 shall expired on April 26, 2011, unless an earlier date is was established in the review process. 7. "Staff' means the persons or positions designated by the mayor for review. The term shall include any consultant hired by the city to assist in its review. 8. "Parent corporation" includes any entity with ownership or control of the CFAR franchise applicant. 9. "Principal" includes any person, firm, corporation, partnership, joint venture, affiliates, or other entity, who or which has control of or interest in a CFAR franchise applicant. 10. "Regulatory authority" includes any governmental or quasi -governmental organization or entity with jurisdiction over all or any portion of the CFAR franchise applicant or its operations C. Competitive Franchise Application Submission. A CFAR franchise applicant shall include in its application detailed written responses to the requisite information set forth in ECC 4.68.400, in addition to any information required by 47 CFR Section 76.41 (hereinafter collectively the "application"). A CFAR franchise applicant shall submit an application fee required under ECC 4.68.410 as part of its application to the city. A CFAR franchise applicant shall also provide any additional information requested by the staff that is relevant to the evaluation of the application under the criteria adopted herein and applicable law. Completed application and the application fee shall be filed with the administrative services director eit-y eleat the following address: Administrative Services Director City Cie City of Edmonds 121 — 5th Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 The staff shall accept and review only those applications that include complete responses to every element of the information required herein. Submission of an application that does not include the requisite information set forth in ECC 4.68.400 and the application fee shall not commence the time period set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 for granting or denying an application. If the staff requests any additional information from the CFAR franchise applicant, the time period set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 shall be tolled from the date the information is requested until the date such information is received by the staff. The CFAR franchise applicant shall immediately submit additional or updated information as necessary to ensure the requisite information provided is complete and accurate throughout the staff review of the application. Packet Pg. 440 9.2.b Upon request, the staff will promptly provide access to documents or information in its possession or control that are necessary for the completion of an application; provided, that the CFAR franchise applicant does not otherwise have access to such documents or information and that such documents or information are subject to disclosure under Washington public records laws. 4.68.400 CFAR application requisites. A. Identification and Ownership Information. 1. Identification of Applicant and Proposed Franchisee. a. State the name, address, telephone number and web site (if applicable) of the applicant and the proposed franchisee (if different from applicant). b. State the name, address, primary telephone number and primary e-mail address of all individual(s) authorized to represent the applicant before the staff during their consideration of the franchise(s) requested, including the applicant's primary contact and any additional authorized contacts. 2. Business Structure. a. Corporation. i. If applicant is a corporation, please list all officers and members of the board of directors, their principal affiliations and their addresses; ii. Attach a certified copy of the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the corporation as well as certificates of good standing from the Secretary of State of the state of incorporation as well as the state of Washington; and iii. State whether the applicant is directly or indirectly controlled by another corporation or legal entity. If so, attach an explanatory statement and response to subsections (2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section concerning the controlling corporation. b. Partnership. i. If applicant is a partnership, please describe the structure of the partnership and the interests of general and limited partners. ii. State whether the applicant is controlled directly or indirectly by any corporation or other legal entity. If so, respond to subsections (2)(a)(i) and (ii) or (2)(b)(i) of this section, as applicable, concerning the controlling entity. 3. Experience. a. Current Franchises. Please list all cable systems operated by the applicant in the last five years. For each system, include name of system, address, communities served, number of subscribers, number of homes passed, date of system award, duration (start and end date) Packet Pg. 441 9.2.b of franchise, status of construction, and percent of penetration of homes passed as of most recently available date (include date). Also include name, title, and telephone number of the system manager and authorized representative of the franchising authority. b. Pending Franchises. List communities where the applicant or any affiliate currently has a formal or informal request pending for an initial franchise, the renewal of a franchise, or the approval of a transfer of ownership. Include names of communities, date of application, date of expected action, and estimated number of homes. Also include complete contact information of an authorized representative of the franchise authority. 4. Management Structure. Attach a management/organizational chart showing the management structure of the applicant. Also, provide a similar chart showing the relationship of the applicant to all general partners, parent corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates and all other subsidiaries of parent corporation, including a brief description of each entity's relationship to the applicant. 5. Management Agreement. State whether there are any management agreements existing or proposed between the applicant and any parent corporation or affiliate related to construction and operation of the applicant's planned system in Edmonds. If yes, attach a copy of any such agreement. B. Legal Qualifications. 1. Media Cross -Ownership. Section 613 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 USC Section 533 (a), and applicable FCC rules prohibit certain forms of media cross - ownership. Please state whether the applicant or an affiliate directly or indirectly owns, operates, controls or has an interest in any of the following, or whether the applicant holds or operates any company or business operating jointly with any of the following: a. A national broadcast television network (such as ABC, CBS or NBC, etc.). b. A television broadcast station whose predicted Grade B contour, computed in accordance with Section 73.684 of the FCC's rules, overlaps in whole or in part in the city, or an application for license to operate such a station. c. A telecommunications or telephone company whose service area includes any portion of the city. If the response to any of the above is affirmative, state the name of the applicant or affiliate, the nature and percentage of ownership or interest and the company that is owned or in which the interest is held. 2. Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action. Federal law requires cable system operators to be certified by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as being in compliance with the equal employment opportunity requirements of Section 634(e) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 USC Section 554(e). The applicant shall attach any current FCC certification(s) for its existing cable system holdings, if any, or indicate its intention to apply for and abide by same. Packet Pg. 442 9.2.b 3. Franchise Violations. State whether the applicant or any affiliate has been found in violation by a regulatory authority or franchising authority of any franchise ordinance or agreement, contract or regulation governing a cable system. If so, identify the judicial or administrative proceeding, giving the date, name of tribunal and result or disposition of that proceeding. 4. Other Violations. State whether the applicant or any affiliate has been found in violation of any franchise, ordinance, agreement, permit, contract or regulation by a regulatory authority of any other type (e.g., public utility commission). If so, identify the judicial or administrative proceeding, giving the date, name of tribunal and result or disposition of that proceeding. C. Financial Qualifications. 1. For applicants with existing operations: provide audited financial statements, including statements of income, balance sheets and cash flow statements, together with any notes necessary to the understanding of the financial statements for the last three fiscal years for the applicant and any parent corporation. Please provide associated operating statistics including distribution plant miles, homes passed, number of basic cable service subscribers, and number of subscribers to other tiers or services, including digital services, Internet access services, telephone services and number of premium units, for the operations corresponding to the financial statements. 2. For all applicants: provide detailed pro forma projections for both applicant's operations in the city and any regional or national planned operations of which the city is a part for the next five fiscal years from the date of the application, including balance sheets, income statements, and statements of cash flows, or, alternatively, at a minimum, detailed projected income and cash flow statements. Please include associated operating statistic assumptions for these projections including distribution plant miles, homes passed, number of basic cable service subscribers, number of subscribers to other tiers or services (e.g., digital service, high-speed Internet access service, telephone service, etc.), and number of premium units. Also, describe any other assumptions reflected in the projections, including (a) revenue assumptions, such as service rates, (b) expense assumptions, such as direct costs of service, staffing levels, or anticipated cost inflation, (c) capital expenditure assumptions, such as miles of plant to be built and costs per mile of construction or per subscriber, and (d) financing assumptions, such as funds to be borrowed and from whom, interest rates, and timing of repayment, or equity infusions and distributions. Please provide these projections in electronic (Excel spreadsheet) form as well as in printed form. D. Technical Qualifications, Planned Services and Operations. 1. Describe the applicant's planned initial and proposed geographic cable service area, including a map and proposed dates for offering service to each area; 2. If the applicant has or asserts existing authority to access the public right-of-way in any of the initial or proposed service areas listed in subsection (D)(1) of this section, state the basis for such authority or asserted authority and attach the relevant agreements or other documentation of such authority; Packet Pg. 443 9.2.b 3. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned residential cable services, including basic cable services, cable programming service tiers, and any additional pay -per -view, on -demand or digital services; and the projected rates for each category or tier or service; 4. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned system technical design, upstream and downstream capacity and speed, provision for analog or digital services or packages, distribution of fiber, and planned count of households per residential node; 5. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned nonresidential cable services; 6. Describe the applicant's planned construction and extension or phase schedule, as applicable, including system extension plans or policy; describe current status of the applicant's existing or proposed arrangements with area utilities, including pole attachments, vault, or conduit sharing agreements as applicable; 7. Describe the applicant's plan to ensure that the safety, functioning and appearance of property and convenience and safety of other persons not be adversely affected by installation or construction of the applicant's facilities, and that property owners are justly compensated for any damages caused by the installation, construction, operation or removal of the facilities; also state the proposed allocation of costs of installation, construction, operation or removal of facilities between the applicant and the subscriber; 8. Describe the availability and cost of a device to enable a subscriber to block obscene or indecent programming; and 9. Describe the applicant's plan to comply with the subscriber privacy protections set forth in 47 USC Section 551. E. Minimum Franchise Obligations. Please state the applicant's intention to meet each of the following minimum cable franchise standards: 1. Model Franchises. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of this chapter. 2. Right -of -Way ("ROW") Regulations. The applicant shall stipulate in writing that it will at all times comply with all applicable and lawful city laws and regulations related to use of the public ROW within the boundaries of the city. 3. Nondiscrimination. The applicant shall stipulate that it shall not deny cable service to any group of potential residential cable subscribers in the cable service area proposed by applicant based on their income. 4. Franchise Fees. The applicant shall pay franchise fees on a monthly basis, unless otherwise agreed to by the city, at the franchise fee rate established by ordinance for all cable service providers in Edmonds. F. City Expectations. The applicant will provide a detailed proposal as part of its application regarding each of the below provisions to enable the city to determine whether the application meets the cable - related needs and interests of the city. Packet Pg. 444 9.2.b 1. Build -Out. The city expects that all residents within a specified cable service area will have access to applicant's cable services consistent with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations. The applicant shall provide a proposal to provide access to cable services to all residents in applicant's proposed cable service area within a reasonable time period. Maps of existing franchise districts are on file with the staff s office or available by contacting the city at 425-775-2525. The staff may reconsider cable service areas proposed by applicant that overlap the geographic boundaries of existing Edmonds cable franchise districts. Applicant shall clearly specify all build -out criteria and exceptions. 2. PEG Channel Capacity. The applicant shall provide the same channel capacity as available under existing incumbent city cable franchise agreements. Channel capacity is not limited to channels currently in use but shall include all available channels under existing franchise agreements. G. Proposed Franchise Terms. The city's model cable franchise template, Attachment A to this rule, reflects terms and conditions required of other cable operations in Edmonds as of the effective date of the CFAR. The applicant shall list any proposed amendments to the model cable franchise template and an explanation as to why the amendment should be considered by the city. These proposed amendments may either be included in this section of applicant's CFAR franchise application or shown directly on the model cable franchise template. An electronic copy of the model cable franchise template may be obtained by calling staff at 425-775-2525 or on the city's web site: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. H. Miscellaneous Provisions. State whether the applicant contemplates the provision of any cable services on its system under an open video systems ("OVS") regulatory regime, within the meaning of Section 653 of the 1934 Communications Act (47 USC Section 573). I. Affidavit of Applicant. Each application shall be accompanied by an affidavit substantially in the form set forth below: This application of the Applicant is submitted by the undersigned who has been duly authorized to make the representations within on behalf of the Applicant and certifies the representations are true and correct. The Applicant recognizes that all representations are binding on it and that material misrepresentations or omissions, or failure to adhere to any such representation may result in a negative staff recommendation to the Edmonds City Council, or denial of a CFAR Franchise Application by the Edmonds City Council. Consent is hereby given to the staff and their representatives or agents to make inquiry into the legal character, technical, financial and other qualifications of the Applicant by contacting any persons or organizations named herein as references, or by any other appropriate means. The Applicant recognizes that information submitted is open to public inspection and subject to the Washington Public Records Law. We advise the Applicant to be familiar with the Washington Public Records Act at Chapter 42.56 RCW. The Applicant should specifically identify any information which the Applicant has deemed proprietary, the Staff, as appropriate, will tender to the Applicant the defense of any request to compel disclosure. By submitting information which the Applicant deems proprietary or otherwise Packet Pg. 445 9.2.b exempt from disclosure, the Applicant agrees to defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds and the staff from any claim for disclosure including but not limited to expenses including out-of-pocket costs and attorneys' fees, as well as any judgment entered against the City of Edmonds or the staff for the attorney fees of the party requesting disclosure. Name of Applicant's Authorized Representative: Affiant's Signature: Official Position: Date: NOTARIZATION Subscribed and sworn before me this of , 20 Notary Public for Washington: My Commission expires: J. Application Fee. The application fee to cover the reasonable cost of processing application is set forth in ECC 4.68.410. The fee shall be equal to the actual, reasonable costs of review, and the application fee shall be considered a deposit against payment or reimbursement of the city's costs. K. Review Process. 1. Acceptance of Application. Within 10 business days of receipt of an application, staff shall review the application to ensure all requisite information is included in the application. a. If the application is not complete, staff will notify the applicant in writing within 10 business days, listing the requisite information that is required to complete the application and notifying the applicant that the time period for granting or denying the application set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 will not begin to run until such information is received. b. If the application is complete, staff will notify the applicant in writing within five business days by certified mail that all requisite information has been received. 2. Staff Review. Staff shall review all completed applications based on the review criteria set forth herein. If, during the review of an application, staff requires additional information from the applicant, staff will promptly request the information from the applicant, in writing, along with a notification that the time period for granting or denying the application set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 will be tolled until such information is received by the staff. After completing the review, staff shall provide an analysis of the application and recommendations to the Edmonds city council. 3. Public Notification and Opportunity to Comment. The Edmonds city council may hold a public hearing to provide the applicant and residents in the proposed cable service area prompt notice and an opportunity to comment on any CFAR franchise application. Notice requirements for public hearings shall be provided 10 business days in advance; provided, however, that the Packet Pg. 446 9.2.b administrative services director " may shorten or alter these requirements as needed to meet the deadline for a council decision set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41, unless the applicant and the staff agree to extend the deadline. 4. Review Criteria. The staff may recommend to the city council denial of an application of any of the following exists: a. The applicant does not have the financial, technical, or legal qualifications to provide cable service; or b. The applicant will not provide adequate public, educational, and governmental access channel capacity, facilities, or financial support, as evidenced by the most recent needs ascertainment conducted by or on behalf of the staff or other relevant study of community needs; or c. The applicant will not meet the city's minimum reasonable build -out requirements; or d. The applicant's proposed terms do not comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations including, but not limited to, local customer service standards or relevant existing city contractual obligations; or e. Applicant has made material misrepresentations or omissions, or has failed to adhere to any such representations. 5. Length of Franchise. A franchise granted under these provisions shall expire on the date established in the review process, in no event later than April 26, 2011, the same date as any underlying, nonexclusive cable franchise previously granted by the city. This franchise length has been established in order to permit full assessment of the needs of the city and its citizens as permitted by 47 USC Section 521, et seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder as this chapter is revised. Section 5. Chapter 4.72 ECC (Business License) is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strip): 4.72.010 Definitions. In construing the provisions of this chapter, save when otherwise declared or clearly apparent from the context, the following definitions shall be applied: A. Person. The term "person" shall include one or more persons of either- s&and gender, corporations, partnerships, associations, or other entity capable of having an action at law brought against such entity, but shall not include employees of of persons licensed pursuant to this chapter. B. Business. The term "business" includes all services and activities engaged in with the object of pecuniary gain, benefit or advantage to the person, or to any other person or class, directly or indirectly, whether part-time or full-time. Packet Pg. 447 9.2.b C. Engaging in Business. The term "engaging in business" means commencing, conducting, or continuing in business, and also the exercise of corporate or franchise powers, as well as liquidating a business when the liquidators thereof hold themselves out to the public as conducting such business. 1. This section sets forth examples of activities that constitute engaging in business in the city, and establishes safe harbors for certain of those activities so that a person who meets the criteria may engage in de minimis business activities in the city without having to pay a business license fee. The activities listed in this section are illustrative only and are not intended to narrow the definition of "engaging in business" in subsection (C) of this section. If an activity is not listed, whether it constitutes engaging in business in the city shall be determined by considering all the facts and circumstances and applicable law. 2. Without being all-inclusive, any one of the following activities conducted within the city by a person, or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another acting on its behalf, constitutes engaging in business and requires a person to register and obtain a business license: a. Owning, renting, leasing, maintaining, or having the right to use, or using, tangible personal property, intangible personal property, or real property permanently or temporarily located in the city. b. Owning, renting, leasing, using, or maintaining an office, place of business, or other establishment in the city. c. Soliciting sales. d. Making repairs or providing maintenance or service to real or tangible personal property, including warranty work and property maintenance. e. Providing technical assistance or service, including quality control, product inspections, warranty work, or similar services on or in connection with tangible personal property sold by the person or on its behalf. f. Installing, constructing, or supervising installation or construction of real or tangible personal property. g. Soliciting, negotiating, or approving franchise, license, or other similar agreements. h. Collecting current or delinquent accounts. i. Picking up and transporting tangible personal property, solid waste, construction debris, or excavated materials. j. Providing disinfecting and pest control services, employment and labor pool services, home nursing care, janitorial services, appraising, landscape architectural services, security system services, surveying, and real estate services including the listing of homes and managing real property. Packet Pg. 448 9.2.b k. Rendering professional services such as those provided by accountants, architects, attorneys, auctioneers, consultants, engineers, professional athletes, barbers, baseball clubs and other sports organizations, chemists, psychologists, court reporters, dentists, doctors, detectives, laboratory operators, teachers, veterinarians. 1. Meeting with customers or potential customers, even when no sales or orders are solicited at the meetings. m. Training or recruiting agents, representatives, independent contractors, brokers or others, domiciled or operating on a job in the city, acting on its behalf, or for customers or potential customers. n. Investigating, resolving, or otherwise assisting in resolving customer complaints. o. In-store stocking or manipulating products or goods, sold to and owned by a customer, regardless of where sale and delivery of the goods took place. p. Delivering goods in vehicles owned, rented, leased, used, or maintained by the person or another acting on its behalf. 3. If a person, or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another acting on the person's behalf, engages in no other activities in or with the city but the following, it need not register and obtain a business license: a. Meeting with suppliers of goods and services as a customer. b. Meeting with government representatives in their official capacity, other than those performing contracting or purchasing functions. c. Attending meetings, such as board meetings, retreats, seminars, and conferences, or other meetings wherein the person does not provide training in connection with tangible personal property sold by the person or on its behalf. This provision does not apply to any board of directors member or attendee engaging in business such as a member of a board of directors who attends a board meeting. d. Renting tangible or intangible property as a customer when the property is not used in the city. e. Attending, but not participating in, a "trade show" or "multiple vendor events." Persons participating at a trade show shall review the city's trade show or multiple vendor event ordinances. f. Conducting advertising through the mail. g. Soliciting sales by phone from a location outside the city. 4. A seller located outside the city merely delivering goods into the city by means of common carrier is not required to register and obtain a business license; provided, that it engages in no Packet Pg. 449 9.2.b other business activities in the city. Such activities do not include those in subsection (C)(3) of this section. The city expressly intends that engaging in business include any activity sufficient to establish nexus for purposes of applying the license fee under the law and the Constitutions of the United States and the state of Washington. Nexus is presumed to continue as long as the taxpayer benefits from the activity that constituted the original nexus generating contact or subsequent contacts. D. Rental Unit. The term "rental unit" shall mean a separate room or apartment leased for human occupancy and contained within a single structure, and shall include the operations of rooming houses, boarders within private residences and the operation of bed and breakfast establishments. E. Private Residence. The term "private residence" shall mean a separate, freestanding structure leased for residential purposes and human occupancy by one "family" as defined by ECDC 21.30.010. F. Day. The term "day" when used in this chapter shall refer to days on which the city of Edmonds City Hall is open for business. Any day which is defined as a holiday by ordinance and any day on which City Hall has been closed by exee�.for business shall not constitute a "day." G. Business Licensing Service. The term "Business Licensing Service" or "BLS" means the office within the Washington State Department of Revenue providing business licensing services to the city 4.72.020 Business License Required. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate, engage in or practice any business in the city of Edmonds without first having obtained a business license from the city. If more than one business is located on a single premises, a separate license shall be required for each separate business conducted, operated, engaged in or practiced. 4.72.021 Threshold exemption. To the extent set forth in this section, the following persons and businesses shall be exempt from the registration, license and/or license fee requirements as outlined in this chapter: A. Any person or business whose annual value of products, gross proceeds of sales, or gross income of the business in the city is equal to or less than $12,000 and who does not maintain a place of business within the city, i.e., a non-resident applicant, shall be exempt from the general business license requirements in this chapter. The exemption does not apply to regulatory license requirements or activities that require a specialized permit. B. Nonprofit organizations or corporations with tax exempt status under 26 USC Section 501(c)(3) shall require a nonprofit business license but are exempt from a license fee. 4.72.023 Registration of transient accommodations. Repealed by Ord. 3900. 4.72.030 Procedure. Packet Pg. 450 9.2.b A. Application for the business license shall be made to the Washington State Business Licensing Service, and must include all information required for the licenses requested, and total fees due for all licenses requested, as well as the handling fee required by RCW 19.02.075. B. The administrative services director eity or designee shall receive all applications for city business licenses. The administrative services director eity ele or designee shall cause an investigation of the completed application to be made by the proper city officials and shall grant or refuse to grant the license within 15 days of the date of receipt of the application information._ Applications may be referred to the planning and development services department, the fire department, or other governmental agencies for their review. Compliance with building zoning and other laws is the business owner's responsibility and issuance of a business license is not a ,guarantee of compliance or a waiver of future enforcement by the city or other agencyjurisdiction. If an application is refused, the reason for refusal shall be designated on the application. The application fee shall not be refunded, except under the following circumstances: 1. An applicant requests cancellation of a license application from the city within five business days of submitting an application to the Business Licensing Service. 4.72.040 Fee — Terms — Penalty. A. Business licenses required to be obtained pursuant to this chapter expire on the date established by the Business Licensing Service. The renewal application must be submitted to the Business Licensing Service, and must contain all information that may be required for all licenses being renewed, and the total fees due for all licenses being renewed, as well as the handling fee required by RCW 19.02.075. B. The annual amounts of fees for the city business licenses issued hereunder shall be as follows: 1. The fee for an application for a new business license for any business that is not a home occupation, as provided in ECDC 20.20.010, to be operated from any real estate within the city of Edmonds shall be $125.00; 2. The fee for an application for a new business license for a new home occupation business, as provided in ECDC 20.20.010, to be operated from any residential real estate within the city of Edmonds shall be $100.00; 3. The fee for an application for a new business license for any other business conducted for, under contract with or by providing services to any person within the city, to be operated in locations outside the city limits, shall be $50.00; and 4. The fee for an application for an annual renewal of a city business license shall be $50.00 for any business operated within the city of Edmonds. 5. A nonprofit business license application shall be exempt from a license fee; provided, that the business provides proof of tax exempt status under 26 USC Section 501(c)(3). 6. The term and respective fee amount for a license may be prorated to accommodate synchronizing of the city license expiration date with the business license account expiration date established by the Business Licensing Service. Packet Pg. 451 9.2.b C. All businesses required to renew licenses hereunder shall obtain the same and pay all fees required on or before the expiration date established by the Business Licensing Service. Any business which fails to renew and pay the license fees within said period of time shall, in addition to any other penalties provided in this chapter, be assessed the penalty for such late application and/or payment required by RCW 19.02.085. Failure to renew a license within 120 days after expiration will result in the cancellation of the license. In order to continue business in the city, reapplication for the license is required as provided in this chapter. D. Repealed by Ord. 3036. 4.72.050 Ineligible activities. Notwithstanding any provisions hereof to the contrary, a license hereunder may not be issued to any person who uses or occupies or proposes to use or occupy any real property or otherwise conducts or proposes to conduct any business in violation of the provisions of any ordinance of the city of Edmonds or the statutes of the state of Washington. The granting of a business license shall in no way be construed as permission or acquiescence in a prohibited activity or other violation of the law. 4.72.055 Denial of license — Hearing. In the event that a license is denied under this chapter based on the provisions of ECC 4.72.050, or for any other lawful reason, the applicant may request a hearing. Such request shall be in writing and filed within 10 days of the date of written denial by the city of a license application. A hearing shall be scheduled within 30 days before the hearing examiner. The hearing shall proceed in the following format: A. The applicant/appellant shall present proof of the nature of the activities which it seeks to conduct pursuant to a business license in the city of Edmonds. B. The city shall have the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the activities are in violation of a provision of any ordinance of the city of Edmonds, or the general statutes of the state of Washington. C. The applicant/appellant may then present any rebuttal testimony which it wishes to present. The hearing examiner shall enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law. No motion for reconsideration shall be available to either party. Appeal of the final decision shall be to the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the applicable laws of the state of Washington. 4.72.060 Revocation or suspension. The mayor or his designee may, at any time, suspend or revoke any license issued hereunder whenever the licensee or officer or partner thereof has been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of violating any statute of the United States or the state of Washington or any ordinance of the city of Edmonds upon the business premises stated in the license or in connection with the business stated in the license; where the business activity violates ECC 4.72.050; or where the place of business does not conform to the ordinances of the city of Edmonds. Prior to such suspension or revocation, the permittee shall be provided an opportunity for a hearing. The licensee shall be notified in writing by sending a written notice to the address stated on the license of the intention of the city to revoke or Packet Pg. 452 9.2.b suspend said license. The applicant may then appeal by filing written notice with the administrative services director eity ele or designee within 10 days of the notice of revocation or suspension. The administrative services director e or designee shall schedule a hearing within 20 days before the hearing examiner. The licensee may appear at that time and be heard in opposition to such revocation or suspension. 4.72.065 Transfer or sale of business — New license required. Upon the sale or transfer of any business licensed by this chapter, the license issued to the prior owner or transferor shall automatically expire on the date of such sale or transfer and the new owner intending to continue such business in the city of Edmonds shall apply for a new business license pursuant to the procedures established by this chapter. 4.72.070 Penalty for violation. Any person, as defined herein, and the officers, directors, managing agents, or partners of any corporation, firm, partnership or other organization or business violating or failing to comply with any provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine in any sum not exceeding $250.00 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding nine months, or both, and each day of violation shall constitute a separate offense. Section 7. Chapter 4.90 ECC (Public Markets), subsections .020, .050, .090, and .100, are hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike 4.90.020 Activities requiring a license. It shall be unlawful for any person to own, use or permit property to be used as a public market until the market and site have been licensed under this chapter. No person shall then sell or offer for sale products at any location in conjunction with a market activity until sponsor has been duly licensed and each vendor submitted to the city. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to authorize activities to be conducted in accordance with the market's activities unless appropriately licensed as required under another provision of this code; provided, however, that business license requirements are limited as provided in ECC 4.90.050. A special event permit under Chapter 4.100 ECC and a City of Edmonds business license under Chapter 4.72 ECC shall be required before a public market ma, begin operating , pawnbrokers and dealers of seeandhand goods shall not eendtiet aefivifies in Chapter- 4.72 EGG A. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale goods at a public market unless such person has been listed on the application fee of the licensee and paid the processing requirement specified herein. Packet Pg. 453 9.2.b B. All structures employed on the site shall comply with the requirements of the State Building Code, including but not limited to the Uniform Building and Fire Code elements. C. The activities of the public market shall be limited to daylight hours on Saturday and Sunday of each week within public rights -of -way, but extended hours are allowed up to 10:00 p.m. for any day of the week if the market takes place outdoors on private property or public property not located within public rights -of -way. Operational hours related to activities of the public market are not limited when the market takes place within a fully enclosed building. 4.90.050 Sponsor licensee — Business license required when. The sponsor of a market shall be required to obtain a City of Edmonds business license and a special event permit before the market may begin operating. The issuanee of a p ub lie v.,.,f4wt heense to the . . ntended to setwe as a master- lieense authorizing limited business aetivities. Vendors at the markets renting or leasing space from the mastersponsor licensee are not required to have a city business license unless they engage in other business activities subject to licensing under the provisions of this title. By way of illustration and not limitation, a the following examples are o r-e : B— A business license shall be obtained by any vendor who conducts business activities beyond the premises licensed as a public market and/or outside of the time for which the license is issued. For example, a business operating from a booth on the premises licensed as a public market during the days of approved market operation shall not require a business license to conduct such activities. If, however, the vendor conducts other business activities subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.72 ECC, the person conducting such activities shall be duly licensed in accordance with the provisions of that chapter. 4.90.090 Application for license. Each applicant for a license to operate a public market shall file an application with the administrative services director eity eleaccompanied by the license fee provided for in ECC 4.90.070. The application shall be in writing and submitted on a form prepared by the administrative services director eity elek and signed by the applicant. The application shall give the applicant's nonprofit organization's business address and principal business location, a copy of documents indicating its charitable nonprofit status as well as the residence address and phone number of the applicant's agent. In addition to such other information as the administrative services director "shall require, the application shall be accompanied by: A. A plot plan showing the location of any outdoor facilities or activities. Adequate parking and ingress and egress shall be maintained during the course of this temporary special event. Adequate precautions shall be put in place to prevent vehicular access to pedestrian pathways within the confines of the activity. Applications to utilize a site or lot already occupied by an existing business shall show Packet Pg. 454 9.2.b on the plot plan the location of all parking required to be provided under the provisions of Chapter 17.50 ECDC for such business. B. A list of each and every vendor participating or anticipated to participate in the market for which the license is sought shall be submitted to the administrative services director eit-y elerl£. The listing shall include the vendor's name, address and business phone number together with a general description of goods and/or services offered by each vendor. Any changes in the list of vendors shall be provided to the administrative services director e in a minimum of three business days prior to the date of the proposed change (i.e., the first date at which the new vendor will participate in the market). C. Provisions for event management and garbage control shall be addressed in a management plan. All tables, tents, booths, signs and other structures associated with the market shall be removed from public rights -of -way at the end of each day; provided, however, that approved outdoor storage may be provided between the close of business the day a public market is held and commencement of business the following morning on public land not located within public rights -of -way or on private property. D. Garbage receptacles shall be strategically located and have sufficient capacity to accommodate the vendors and estimated members of the public in attendance. In addition the area shall be kept clean of rubbish, garbage, junk, waste paper, plastic, styrofoam cups, sacks, food and other waste. The city of Edmonds encourages the use of recycling receptacles and products whenever possible. The license holder shall be responsible to keep the area clean. The area to be kept clean shall include the area immediately surrounding sidewalks and public streets. E. Temporary signage announcing the event shall be approved on the site in the licensing process in accordance with the requirements of ECDC 20.60.080. F. The fire marshal shall designate appropriate fire lanes through the licensed area on the plot plan. These fire lanes are intended for pedestrian use and shall be kept free of structures, debris or other blockage. Failure to maintain appropriate fire lanes shall be cause for immediate revocation of the license. The police chief may, in his or her sole discretion, require that security personnel be provided by the public market during times and in a number designated by the police. 4.90.100 Records. The named licensee sponsor of the public market shall maintain a record of all vendors participating in the event. Such record shall be available for inspection by the administrative services director eit�- eler-k or a designated agent during normal business hours of city offices (that is, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Section 8. Chapter 4.98 ECC (Constitutionally Protected Events) is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-rike ffifeegk): Packet Pg. 455 9.2.b Chapter 4.98 CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED EVENTS / EXPRESSIVE EVENTS 4.98.010 Definitions. A. "Constitutionally protected events" or "expressive events" include any event, such as political or religious activity, intended primarily for the communication or expression of ideas, in which no fee or donation is charged as a condition of participation or attendance, and that is to--4e conducted on public property or on a public right-of-way; and, also, any such event held on private property which would have a direct significant impact on traffic congestion or traffic flow to and from the event over public streets or rights -of -way; or which would significantly impact public streets or rights -of -way near the event; or which would significantly impact the need for city -provided emergency services, such as police, fire or medical aid. B. "Use" shall mean to construct, erect, or maintain in, on, over or under any street, right-of-way, park or other public place any building, structure, sign, equipment or scaffolding, to deface any public right- of-way by painting, spraying or writing on the surface thereof, or to otherwise occupy in such a manner as to obstruct the normal public use of any public street, right-of-way, park or other public place within the city, including a use related to special events. 4.98.020 Permit required. A. A permit from the city is required for any constitutionally protected events or expressive events as defined in this chapter. Such permit shall be in lieu of any other city permit, including but not limited to special event, Tar-ade, street use and park use permits as they may be required by ordinance. B. Contents of Application. The applicant must file the application in writing on a form supplied by the city to the license officer, setting forth: 1. Contact information of the applicant, including but not limited to name, telephone number and address; 2. The date, time, and expected duration of the event; 3. The probable number of participants; 4. The place or route of the event, including a map and written narrative of the proposed route; 5. A description of all public ways proposed to be blocked; 6. A description of the measures to be taken to protect participants and the general public from injury, including traffic control and crowd control, emergency medical services, fire and life safety services and emergency communication systems; 7. A description of the measures to be taken to ensure cleanup of any litter or damage resulting from the event; 8. The number and location of portable sanitation facilities, if any; Packet Pg. 456 9.2.b 9. A certification that the applicant will be financially responsible for any cost to the city resulting from breach of any condition of the permit; 10. A certification that the applicant will not sponsor or encourage any commercial activity unrelated to First Amendment rights during the event; 11. A description of the types and number of vehicles to be used in the special event; 12. Insurance and surety bond information, if any; 13. Any other additional information required to ensure public health, safety and welfare. C. A constitutionally protected event permit is not required for the following: 1. Parades, Parades of the military forces of the United States of America or the State of Washington. 2. Funeral and wedding processions. 3. Groups required by law to be so assembled. 4. Gatherings of 25 N or fewer people in a city park, unless merchandise or services are offered for sale or trade. 5. Other similar events and activities which do not directly affect or use city services of property. D. Any person desiring to obtain a constitutionally protected event permit shall apply for such a permit by filing an application with the city at least 72 hours 69 days prior to the date on which the event is to occur. E. Waiver of Application Deadline. 1. Good Cause. Upon a showing of good cause or at the discretion of the city, the city shall consider an application that is filed after the filing deadline if there is sufficient time to process and investigate the application and obtain police and other city services for the event. Good cause can be demonstrated by the applicant showing that the circumstance that gave rise to the permit application did not reasonably allow the participants to file within the time prescribed. 2. Spontaneous Demonstration. The City shall waive the 72-hour application deadline in those instances in which a permit is sought for a spontaneous demonstration responding to a local, national or international event, within 72 hours after the event has occurred. F. No Fee. No application or permit fee shall be required in order to obtain a permit for a constitutionally protected event or expressive event. Packet Pg. 457 9.2.b 4.98.030 Grounds for denial of application — Limited. No permit shall be denied by the citv except upon the following grounds: c A. The event location or desired parade route conflicts with another event for which a permit has 14 already been issued; or as B. The proposed event location or route would unreasonably prevent or block the provision of v emergency services within the City of Edmonds or would unduly disturb the convenience of the public w 0 in the use of public streets and sidewalks. w c a) In the event that a permit is denied for the reasons stated in subsection A or B of this section, the City E of Edmonds shall work with the applicant to find an unencumbered time, date, location, or route C suitable to the applicant. The requirement of a permit for constitutionally protected events or E expressive events shall not be used or administered to prevent the exercise of free speech by any a individual or group of individuals so long as the event or route is reasonable as to its time, place and manner. It is the policy of the City of Edmonds to permit, encourage and promote the lawful exercise of free speech by all of it citizens regardless of the content thereof. E 1. The appliea-at provides infefma4ion that is false, misleading, or- aene*istet4 ill a" material -W a c m detail; the applieant fails to eamplete the applieation or- to supply other- required infafmation or- > documents; or the applicant declares or shows an unwillingness or inability to comply with the w reasonableor-0 .� m a - CO abutting p „eft,.. C C� J 3. The dispdpt the tr-af4e proposed event would tip&easenably orderly or- safe eir-eulation of as-V ipjtwy damage w wouldprese-nt an uflfeasenable risk of or- to the publieer 4. The in, illegal dia thfeaten ++ proposed event would engage advaeate, or- eneoufage aetivities NEW 4.98.040 Permit conditions — Appeal. ns L the f plaee and fnanner- of event, and stieh r-equir-efnefits as Q . ++ fell wing , n iti ns apply t all . nstit„ti,,n lly pr-eteeted o ,mot ,. .-, .is. 0 o t cC C (i 1. Alteration the titne, the the of plaee and manner- of event pt:opesed on event applieation. Q Packet Pg. 458 9.2.b ostri .ting the o fA t only . portion E) f the streetor-fight f way. 5. C mplianeev�,ith any other- applieable federal, state E)r- leeal law E)r- regulation. B—. The applicant shall have the right to appeal the denial of a permit or a permit condition. A written notice of appeal shall be filed within three business days after receipt or personal delivery of a notice of denial or permit conditions from the city. Receipt of notice of denial or permit conditions shall be presumed three days after the same is mailed with USPS postage prepaid and certified. The written notice of appeal shall set forth the specific grounds for the appeal and attach any relevant documents for consideration. The hearing examiner shall hear the appeal on the record provided from the designated city official and upon public comment given at the scheduled hearing before the examiner. The hearing shall be scheduled for the earliest possible hearing date after receipt of a timely and proper notice of appeal. The decision of the hearing examiner shall be final. 4.98.050 Revocation of permits. A. Any permit issued under this chapter may be summarily revoked by the city at any time when, by reason of disaster, public calamity, riot or other emergency or exigent circumstances, the city determines the safety of the public or property requires such immediate revocation. The city may also summarily revoke any permit issued pursuant to this chapter if the city finds that the permit has been issued based upon false information or when the permittee exceeds the scope of the permit or fails to comply with any condition of the permit. B. Notice of such action revoking a permit shall be delivered in writing to the permittee by personal service or certified mail at the address specified by the permittee in the application. To the extent that written notice by personal service or certified mail is not likely to achieve timely actual notice, any other reasonable form of notification intended to achieve the same shall suffice. preteeted event pem:iit pufsuant to this ehapter- unless a valid pemit has been issued and Fe i i effeet for- the event. it is ttalawftil for- any per -son to pai4ieipa4e in stteh an event with the knowledge tha4 the speaser- of the evef4 has not been issued a r-e"ir-ed, valid pefmit or- with knowledge that a enee .,li,l p ,mit has expiredor- been r-evoked. NOWN. OWN Packet Pg. 459 9.2.b dier-eef be to fine than misdemeanor-, and upon eenvietion shall subjeet a penalty of a E)f not more $500.00 E)r- by impfisenment of not more than 90 days, of both such fine and imprisonment. -F N C 4.98.070 Savings clause. J If any section, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the .r validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. v U W 0 Section 9. Anew Chapter 4.100 (Special Event Permits) is hereby adopted to read as follows: d E Sections: c E a 4.100.010 Purpose. 4.100.020 Definitions. N 4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events. 4.100.040 Permit applications. m 4.100.050 Indemnification. a 4.100.060 Insurance. 4.100.070 Permit decision. w 4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision. w 4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events. 4.100.100 Cleanup deposit. co 4.100.110 Suspension and revocation. 4.100.120 Exercise of police power. y 4.100.130 Violation — Penalties. d J 4.100.010 Purpose. U U W It is the purpose of the City to establish a process for permitting special events that impact city right- of-way, public property and other facilities or services. It is recognized that these special events ' enhance the City of Edmonds communi and provide benefits to the citizens through the creation of ~ , venues for expression and entertainment that are not normally provided as a part of governmental 5 services. c This Chanter is intended to supplement land use and street right-of-wav regulations. to provide a coordinated process for the regulation of certain activities to be conducted in conjunction with special events, and to ensure that the impacts of the special event do not unduly impact the public's health, safety or welfare. It is further intended to protect and preserve public infrastructure and city resources, prevent unplanned disruption of public services, mitigatepacts to the extent feasible and to create a mechanism for cost recovery without haviniz an adverse effect on those events that contribute to the community. 4.100.020 Definitions. °' E A. "City sponsored event" means a special event for which the city provides some level of sponsorship and/or support to the primary event organizer/sponsor through the use of city funds, equipment, and/or a other city resources that is not a "city contracted event." Citysponsored events may also be special Packet Pg. 460 9.2.b events that are organized and sponsored in full by the City of Edmonds. Reimbursement for cit resources may be reauired. m B. "City contracted event" means a special event that typically takes places on an ongoing annual basis and for which the City and the event organizer/sponsor enter into an event contract to apportion responsibility for the event, thereby eliminating the need for the event organizer/sponsor to obtain a special event permit under this Chapter. Such events may be sponsored in part by the ci . Examples of , city contracted events include the Garden Market/Summer Market, Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July celebration, Oktoberfest, and Taste Edmonds. U U w C. "Commercial special event" means an activity or occurrence sponsored and operated by one or more o businesses that is conducted primarily for the exchange of goods or services for financial gain. Commercial special events typically occur upon private property. Examples of commercial special d events include parking lot sales and tent sales, promotional events, and sidewalk sales. E c a) D. `Emergency response plan" means a plan detailingthe he expected actions of event management and/or a public safety agencies in the event or threat of an emergency_ E. `Expressive event" or "Constitutionally protected event" means an activity or occurrence in which the sole or principal purpose is the expression, dissemination, or communication of political or religious E opinion, views or ideas, and for which no fee or donation is charged or required as a condition of a participation or attendance. Examples of expressive special events include political rallies, marches, c public speeches, and political demonstrations. These events are regulated by Chapter 4.98. w F. "Fire marshal" means the city of Edmonds fire marshal or designee. m a G. "Parade" means a type of special event involving an organized procession or march of more than 25 y persons or 25 objects, or any combination thereof amounting to 25, that temporarily disnpts the general public's normal use of public streets or sidewalks. w c a� H. "Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, incorporated or unincorporated association, organization, or other entity or group of persons, however organized. U U w I. "Private" or "private event" means an event where persons are specifically and individually invited. It does not include an event where tickets, invitations, or announcements are available to the public. J. "Public" or "public event" means a special event open to the public, and includes an event where tickets, invitations, or announcements are available to the public. C m K. "Public amusement" means circuses, carnivals, motion picture shows, exhibitions, concerts, side shows, plays and other stage shows, amusement parks and any other form of diversion, pastime or recreation conducted for and open to the public regardless of whether an admission fee or other charge is made for attendance; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require the licensingand nd inspection of an activity conducted under the auspices of a bona fide, accredited elementary school, middle school, 0 high school or college and conducted on the premises thereof in facilities previously inspected and L approved for public assembly_ L. "Right-of-way" means, within the City of Edmonds, all public right-of-way and property_ granted or m reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for street purposes, together with public property granted or E reserved for, or dedicated to, public use for walkwayss,paths, trails, sidewalks, and bikeways, whether improved, unimproved, or unopened, including the air rights, sub -surface rights and easements related thereto, and over which the City of Edmonds has authority and control. a Packet Pg. 461 9.2.b M. "Run" or "race" means a type of special event involving any race, contest or event, whether of a competitive or a noncompetitive nature. involving a procession of persons. whether afoot or upon anv vehicle or device propelled by the human body, including but not limited to marathons, fun runs, m walkathons, and bicycle races. to c d N. "Security" means employees, or other hired personnel, dedicated to maintaining order and ensuring compliance with the laws of the state of Washington and ordinances of the city of Edmonds. O. "Site" has the same meaning as set forth in ECDC 21.90.090, as now or hereafter amended, and in .r v addition in the case of undeveloped property, a land area under common ownership, whether the land v w area is comprised of one lot, a combination of contiguous lots, or contiguous fractions of lots. o N r P. "Special events" include any event which is to be conducted on public property or in a public right- C of -way; and also, any event held on private property which would have a direct significant impact on: E (a) traffic circulation to and from the event over public streets or rights -of -way_; (b)public streets or C rights -of -way near the event, or (c) the need for city -provided emergency services, such as police, fire d Q or medical aid, as determined by the city. It is presumed that any event on private property which involves: i an open invitation to the public to attend; or (b) anticipated attendance by private invitation of 100 or more people is an event that will have a direct significant impact on the public streets, rights- y of -way or emergency services. Special events may include, but are not limited to: fun runs and walks, E auctions, parades, carnivals, exhibitions, film/movie events, circuses, outdoor markets, and fairs. m IL Q. "Tent" means a temporary membrane structure or shelter, such as pop-up canopies, sails, and the like, c as defined in the current editions of the fire and buildingcodes. w 4.100.030 General provisions applicable to all special events. a CO A. Permit Required. Any person desiring to conduct or operate a special event within the City of m Edmonds shall first obtain a special event permit from the city, unless specifically exempt. It shall be c unlawful for any_person to sponsor or conduct an event or activity requiring a special event permit without a valid special event permit. Penalties for violation of the terms of this chapter shall be as specified by this chapter. v w B. Consistency with Permit and Law. A special event shall be conducted as described by the special event permit, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. am C. Public and Personal Safety. The configuration and operation of special events shall conform to applicable laws and regulations, including provisions relating to emergency ingress and egress, barrier - free facilities, fire prevention, health and sanitation, and the operation of vehicles and equipment. D. Business Licenses and Taxes. As required by pplicable law, special event businesses/vendors shall have City of Edmonds business licenses and shall record, report and remit taxes. E. Exemptions. The following activities and occurrences shall comply with applicable laws and L regulations, but are exempt from the permit requirements of this chapter: c m 1. City contracted events. E 2. Funerals and wedding processions. a Packet Pg. 462 9.2.b 3. Garage sales and rummage sales. 4. Neighborhood block parties. N C 5. Special event facilities. Events conducted at a facility designed for special event purposes or at facilities where such events are normally held, such as churches, event centers, convention j centers, schools, athletic fields, auditoriums, stadiums, theaters, and the like. d .r 6. Governmental activities. Activities conducted by a governmental agency acting within the v scope of its authority. U w 0 7. Regularly scheduled events utilizing park and recreation facilities, in accordance with the intended use of the facility, and with park rules and policies. E 8. A privately scheduled, non -reoccurring event upon private property in a residential zone with d up to 100 persons attending. Q 9. The temporary sale of seasonal goods when regulated by other statutes, such as Christmas tree sales, and peddling of farm produce. E 10. Expressive events (but see Chapter 4.98 for regulations pertaining to o expressive events). a F. Signs. w 1. With a special event permit application, applicants may request, and the appropriate director or designee that would otherwise authorize such signage may authorize, the use of temporary on -site a (on -premises) and off -site (off -premises) signs. W 2. Special event signs shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the sign. Signs shall not obstruct visibili , for motorists and pedestrians, nor impede access to buildings or property. The installation of signs upon public property shall be subject to inspection by the building official and/or city engineer. v U w 3. The applicant shall be responsible for installation, maintenance, and removal of all signs. 4.100.040 Permit applications. m A. The administrative services director or designee is authorized to prepare and maintain necessary application forms and may issue written administrative policies and procedures as needed for the implementation of this chapter. B. Applications for special event permits shall be submitted to the administrative services director or designee, a minimum of 60 days prior to a small event (less than 100 people) and a minimum of 90 dam prior to a major event(more than 100 people). If an event organizer fails to meet these timelines, the O application may still be processed if all affected departments agree process the application within the L shortened timeframe. Factors in determining whether to allow for processing a late application will o include the impact on city resources and rights -of -way, and conflicts with other already scheduled events. m E C. Applications for special event permits shall include written authorization of the property owner. For special events proposed upon city -owned property, the approval of a special event permit application a Packet Pg. 463 9.2.b shall constitute city authorization to conduct the event upon the property described in the permit application. N m D. Applications for special event permits shall be on forms prepared by the administrative services director or designee and shall include information that any city department processing the application deems necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare to enable it to review the application. The information requested shall enable the city to assess the scope of the event so as to evaluate the impact of the event on city resources and the community. c� E. Application fee(s) for special event permits are set forth in the Ci . 's adopted fee schedule. v w 0 4.100.050 Indemnification. w c d Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant and authorized officer of the E sponsoring_ organization must agree to reimburse the city, fly costs incurred by it in repairing damage a� to cily property and indemnify and defend the city, its officers, employees, and agents from all causes E of action, claims or liabilities occurring in connection with the permitted event, except those which occur due to the city's sole negligence. N 4.100.060 Insurance. E L a) Prior to the issuance of a permit for a special event, the permit applicant shall comply with the following c insurance requirements: w (1) The permit applicant shall obtain commercial general liability insurance in amounts acceptable to the city attorney's office. 0. Co (2) Written proof of such insurance is required prior to permit issuance. The insurance policy shall y be written on an occurrence basis, shall name the city as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 26, or coverage at least as broad, and shall be written for a period that includes the timeframe for both the set-u before and the clean -Lip following the com letion of the event. The a licant shall J p p p � v provide the city and all additional insureds for this event with written notice of any v w cancellation within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice. m (3) Liquor Liability Coverage. Liquor liability coverage must be obtained when liquor is served as ~ a part of a special event permitted under this chapter. (a) A vendor hired b, t�pecial event permittee to serve liquor must provide evidence of liquor liability coverage in amounts acceptable to the city attorney's office, namingthe he city as additional insured. This insurance coverage is in addition to the special event permittee's overall general liabili . requirement. (b) A special event permittee serving liquor directly shall obtain host liquor coverage as a part of providing commercial general liability insurance per subsection (1) of this section. o 4.100.070 Permit decision. E A. After receiving a�completed application in conformance with this chapter, along with the non- refundable permit application fee, the administrative services director or designee shall consult with all a affected divisions or departments, such as Building, Planning, Engineering, Police, Fire, Public Works, Packet Pg. 464 9.2.b Parks and Recreation, Finance, and Risk Management. Following consultation with all affected departments and divisions. the administrative services director or designee may approve. conditionallv gpprove, or deny an gpplication for a special event permit based upon the provisions of this chapter. m When an application is conditionally approved or denied, the administrative services director or designee c shall provide written explanation of the for the conditions of approval or denial, and the ,grounds applicant's rightof ppeal pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. d B. Decision criteria. A permit may be issued to an applicant only if all the following criteria and conditions for issuance are met: v c� w 1. The special event will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; o N r 2. The special event will not be injurious to property or improvements in the immediate vicinity C of the special event; E c 3. The special event will not endanger participants, spectators, or the public; a) E 4. The special event has a traffic management plan or other adequate and appropriate measures in place to mitigate any traffic safety and mobility issues, including for both vehicles and pedestrians; E L 5. Adequate and appropriate sanitation and refuse facilities are planned; a) a c m 6. The special event has adequate and appropriate measures in place to ensure the safe movement, w assemblage and dispersion of people attending the event. Such measures may include the use of safely guardrails, fences, ropes, barricades, and the like; a 7. The special event will not cause excessive or harmful fumes, odor, smoke, noise or light and must be consistent with Chapter 5.30 entitled "Noise Abatement and Control"; d 8. The special event will comply with all applicable ordinances relating to food service containers and utensils and provide for the appropriate collection and disposal of waste, recycling, and v compostables; w 9. Adequate plans exist to return the area or routes impacted b. t�pecial event to the same m condition or cleanliness as existed prior to the event; 10. Applicant has agreed to the indemnity and hold harmless provisions in the application; 11. Applicant has provided proof of the requisite insurance provisions in the application; 12. For citysponsored events, applicant has agreed to reimburse the city for the provision of additional city services, including but not limited to the employment of police officers to direct or block pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or the provisions of standby aid car or fire protection services, as required. 4.100.080 Appeal of permit decision. m E Decisions of the administrative services director or designee are appealable. An appeal of the administrative services director or designee's decision related to application of this chapter may be filed a Packet Pg. 465 9.2.b with the administrative services director or designee within 10 business days of notification of the decision. Such anneal shall be filed and processed in accordance with the anneal provisions for business licenses as provided by Chapter 4.72. The meal filing fee shall be as specified by the fee schedule. m N 4.100.090 Reimbursement of fees for city sponsored events. C a) J A. Upon approval of a special event permit application for a city sponsored event, the administrative services director or designee shall provide the applicant with a statement of the estimated cost of providing city resources, such as personnel and equipment, for the special event, if applicable. The v aqpplicant%sponsor of the event may be required to prepay these estimated costs ten (1 O) dgys prior to the v w special event. The special event application fee per the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the city o council is a separate processing fee and is not applicable to the city services fees. City resources may 4 include the use of police officers and public employees for traffic and crowd control; pickup and delivery d of traffic control devices, picnic tables, and the like; extraordinary street sweeping; and any other needed, E requested or required city service, along with the cost of operating any equipment needed to provide C such services. E a B. If the actual cost for the use of city resources on the dates of the city sponsored event is less than cw the estimated cost, the applicant/sponsor will be refunded the difference by the city in a timely manner. If the actual cost for the use of city resources on the dates of the city sponsored event is than E ,greater the estimated cost, the city will invoice the applicant/sponsor for the difference, and the invoice shall be a paid in a timely manner. C w C. Permit fees and fees for the use of city resources may be waived in part or in full by the city if, in ia review of the application, it is found that the city sponsored event is of sufficient public benefit to warrant the expenditure of city funds without reimbursement b, the he applicant/sponsor and would not result in CO the private financial gain of any individual or "for -profit" entity. w m 4.100.100 Cleanup deposit. N aCi J A. The applicant/sponsor of a special event likely to create a substantial need for cleanup may be v required to provide a cleanup deposit prior to the issuance of a special event permit. w B. The cleanup deposit may be returned after the event if the area used for the permitted event has been cleaned and restored to the same condition as existed prior to the event within twenty-four (24,) hours ~ after the conclusion of the event. 5 C. If the property used for the event has not been properly cleaned or restored within twenty-four (24) hours after the conclusion of the event, the applicant/sponsor shall be invoiced for the actual cost to the city for cleanup and restoration, which invoice shall be paid in a timely manner. The cleanup deposit shall be applied toward the payment of the invoice. 4.100.110. Suspension and revocation. A. In instances in which the special event does not comely with the provisions of this chanter, the terms " and conditions of the approved permit, or other applicable law, the administrative services director or C m designee may suspend or revoke an approved special event permit with the issuance of written findings. E B. When necessary to prevent serious injury to persons, property or the public peace, health, safety or a welfare, the administrative services director or designee, fire marshal, building official, development Packet Pg. 466 9.2.b services director or chief of police, or the designee of each, may suspend or revoke an approved special event permit effective immediately. The city official or designee shall deliver written notice of suspension or revocation to the permit applicant/event sponsor or manager. 4.100.120 Exercise of police Dower. This chapter is enacted as an exercise of the cily's police powers and shall not be construed to impose any duty owed by the city to any permittee under this chapter or to any member of the public, nor shall any permit be construed as waiver of any violation of the laws of the city. 4.100.130 Violation — Penalties. A. It shall be a misdemeanor for M person to violate any of the provisions of this chapter or the conditions imposed upon any permit issued hereunder, which shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000,) or imprisonment not to exceed ninety (90) dgys. Each day, or part thereof, during which any such violations occur or are continued, shall constitute a separate offense. B. In addition, permits issued hereunder shall be subject to suspension or revocation as provided herein, and civil abatement proceedines as set forth in Chanter 20.110 ECDC. C. In addition, or alternatively, M person violating the provisions of this chapter or the conditions of any permit issued hereunder shall also subject the permittee to a daily civil penalty in the amount specified by Chanter 20.110 ECDC. D. In addition, or alternatively, any person violating the provisions of the chapter or the conditions of any permit issued hereunder may forfeit their right to hold a special event in the city. Section 10. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 11. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 467 9.2.b APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: :• JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 468 9.2.b Ordinance No. as follows: On the of the City of Edmonds, Washington day of 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed _. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF OR AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN CHAPTERS OF TITLE 4 ECC (LICENSES) AND FOR THE ADOPTION OF A NEW CHAPTER TO TITLE 4 ECC RELATING TO SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 2022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 469 9.2.c RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT -RELATED FEES AND CHARGES TO ADD FEES RELATING TO THE CITY'S SPECIAL EVENTS PERMITS. WHEREAS, ECDC 15.00.020 provides for the establishment and amendment of certain fees charged by the city by resolution; and WHEREAS, extensive effort has been made by city staff to analyze the full costs associated with city permitting and service activities; and WHEREAS, the city council has previously established and affirms as its goal that permit fees shall be set to cover the costs of processing and issuing permits and requests for service; and WHEREAS, the city council adopted Resolution 1475 in June 2021, which adopted a schedule of fees to be charged in relation to permit issuance and other development activity; and WHEREAS, the city council has adopted Ordinance to document in the Edmonds City Code the requirements for obtaining permits from the city to hold Special Events; and WHEREAS, city staff has established the costs associated with issuing such permits; and WHEREAS, this resolution is intended to add the new Special Event Permit fees to the city's schedule of fees and to replace Resolution 1475; now therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The fees and charges for services set forth in the schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby adopted, along with the referenced tables which are also included therein, and shall be effective on and after , 2022. Section 2. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution or any fee or charge for service adopted or amended hereby should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase, or any fee or charge adopted or amended hereby. Section 3. Resolution 1475 shall have no further effect as of , 2022 as the fees adopted by Resolution 1475 are being replaced by the fees adopted herein. Packet Pg. 470 9.2.c RESOLVED this day of 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, MIKE NELSON ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. 2 Packet Pg. 471 I 9.2.c I FEES ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT :j OV E DA, Building — Engineering — Planning - Fire 121 5t" Ave N, Edmonds WA 98020 425.771.0220 Approved fees effective January 1, 2022; ENG updated July 6'h, 2021 Page 1 of Y 11 Packet Pg. 472 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERMIT FEES I 9.2.c I Building / Planning / Engineering / Fire City Technology Fee for each permit application Credit Card Transaction Fee ................................. Development Review Committee Meeting ................................................... Pre -Application Meeting................................................................................ (50% applied toward future plan check fee for that specific project only) Recording Fee (for recording documents with Snohomish County) Violation Compliance Fee $40.00 ..... 3% ............$0 $1,000.00 Recording Cost + $110.00 $250.00 or up to 5x Permit Fee Residential State Building Code Surcharge Fee........................................................................................ $6.50 ..................................................................................................................... Each additional dwelling unit $2.00 Commercial State Building Code Surcharge Fee..................................................................................... $25.00 ..................................................................................................................... Each additional dwelling unit $2.00 (not applicable to certain minor permits such as plumbing, mechanical, re -roof) PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION FEES: Plan review is calculated at 85% of the building permit fee and includes up to 3 reviews per division/ department. Commercial/ Multi -family/ Residential: Plan review fee includes Building, Planning, Fire & Engineering reviews General plan review fee per reviewing department/division.........................................$110.00/hr (1 hr min.) plus peer review fee if applicable Plan review for re -submittals after the 3rd review............................................................................$110.00/hr Development Project Peer Review (Peer Review).................................................................................. $110.00 plus cost of consultant review fee charged for outside consultant peer review services when City staff lacks the expertise to review a specific project or aspect of a project. General Inspection Fee per department/division Re -Inspection Fee ................................................. $110.00/ea $110.00/ea Engineering Inspection Fee*..............................................................................3.3% of Value of Improvements *Applies to Civil Site Improvements, such as Subdivisions, Commercial & Multi -Family Permits Stormwater Engineer Review Fee..... Transportation Engineer Review Fee Utility Engineer Review Fee .............. REFUNDS: $130.00/hr $130.00/hr $130.00/hr The City may authorize refunding of any permit fee paid which was erroneously paid or collected. The City may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with the applicable code(s). The City may also refund not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. Refunds shall not be granted of any fee on an expired permit. Any application for a refund must be made in writing and describe the circumstances to justify. Refunds for permit fees covered by 19.70.025 ECDC may be authorized by the Building Official. The Planning Manager may authorize refunds of Planning fees or service charges. The City Engineer may authorize refunds of Engineering fees or service charges. Page 2 of 1'' Packet Pg. 473 1 I 9.2.c I BUILDING PERMIT FEES Accessory Dwelling Unit Compliance(ADU).............................................................................................$405.00 Adult Family Home Compliance (AFH).....................................................................................................$550.00 Alternate Methods Review.......................................................................................... $110.00/hr+ Peer Review Appeal of Building Official Interpretation.................................................................................................$970.00 Cellular Communication and Facilities...................................................................................................... TABLE 1 Changeof Use............................................................................................................................................ $510.00 Demolition (Residential Primary Structure)..............................................................................................$300.00 Demolition (Commercial Primary Structure)............................................................................................ $500.00 Demolition (Secondary Structure or Interior Only)................................................................................... $150.00 Dock/Marina/Floats..................................................................................................................$200.00+TABLE 1 Fence..........................................................................................................................................................$100.00 Hot Tub/Spa (Single-Family)......................................................................................................................$200.00 Manufactured Coach Installation - Commercial (Federal HUD Label)....................................................$500.00 Manufactured Home Installation (Federal HUD Label)............................................................................$550.00 ParkingLot.................................................................................................................................$200.00+TABLE 1 Re -roof (Commercial).......................................................Valuation based on $2.00 per square foot +TABLE 1 Re -roof (Residential - includes sheathing)................................................................................................ $100.00 Retaining Wall (Commercial)............................................................................................ $740.00 + Peer Review Retaining Wall (Residential).............................................................................................. $300.00 + Peer Review Solar/Photovoltaic (Residential)................................................................................................................$120.00 Solar/Photovoltaic (Commercial) - Valuation does not include cost of solar panels or inverters......... TABLE 1 Swimming Pool (Pre -manufactured, above ground)................................................................................$120.00 Swimming Pool (In-Ground)...................................................................................................................... TABLE 1 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (Commercial Only — valid for 60 days) ......................................... $330.00 SIGNS: Sign (Per sign excluding specific sign categories listed below)................................................................ $165.00 Blade Sign (Includes all blade signs in proposal)............................................................................................... $0 Pedestrian Sign (Includes all pedestrian signs in proposal)....................................................................... $80.00 PoleSign (per sign).................................................................................................................................... $825.00 Murals (Includes all murals in a proposal)................................................................................................ $165.00 *Planning ADB Design Review may apply ESLHA DESIGNATED PROPERTIES: Additional fees associated with development in the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA) ESLHA Administrative Fee ESLHA Consultant Review Deposit at Application for Peer Completeness Review ......... Deposit at Full Application...................................................... Deposit at Re -submittal if additional Peer Review is needed ESLHA Minor Project Administrative Processing Fee ................. ESLHA Submittal Packet............................................................... ............................................... $ 2, 385.00 Full cost of review is paid by applicant. ................................................. $500.00 ............................................... $2,500.00 ............................................... $1,500.00 .................................................. $ 300.00 ................................................... $15.00 Page 3 of 1? Packet Pg. 474 1 I 9.2.c I MECHANICAL PERMITS: BASEPERMIT FEE: ...................................................................................................................................... $50.00 UNIT FEE SCHEDULE: For the installation or relocation of each: FURNACE - Forced -air or gravity -type, including ducts and appliance vents.........................................$30.00 AIR HANDLER- Including ducts (Diffusers, blowers, etc.) Up to and including 10,000 cfm (4719 L/s).......................................................................................$30.00 Over 10,000 cfm (4719 L/s) including ducts......................................................................................$40.00 GAS HEATER -Suspended, recessed wall or floor -mounted unit...........................................................$30.00 HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM..................................................................................................................$150.00 APPLIANCE VENT - (Type B, BW, L gas vent, etc.).................................................................................... $15.00 INCINERATOR....................................................................................................................................... $50.00 VENTILATION AND EXHAUST Fan connected to single duct (Bath, laundry, kitchen exhaust, etc.)...............................................$15.00 Each system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system .............................. $15.00 HOOD - Type 1, Type 2, Fume Hood including ducts............................................................................$150.00 GAS PIPING: (New or relocated) Gas -Piping systems of 1 to 5 outlets........................................................................................................ $30.00 Each additional outlet over 5..................................................................................................................... $5.00 BOILER OR COMPRESSOR Up to and including 50 HP (176 KW)........................................................................................................$50.00 Over 50 HP (176 kW)...............................................................................................................................$100.00 ABSORPTION SYSTEM, AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM OR HEAT PUMP Up to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW)................................................................................... $50.00 Over 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW)..........................................................................................................$100.00 OTHER FEES: Commercial Plan review hourly fee..................................................................................................$110.00/hr Each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the IMC for which no other fee is listed (Fire dampers, ductless mini- split systems, etc.)............................................................ $30.00 Page 4 of 1? Packet Pg. 475 1 I 9.2.c I PLUMBING PERMITS: BASE PERMIT FEE: .................................................................................................................................... $50.00 UNIT FEE SCHEDULE: For the installation, alteration, repair, addition or relocation of each: ......................................................... $15.00 Plumbing fixture (on one trap or a set of fixtures on one trap) Drain w/in footprint of building (rainwater systems, roof deck drains, etc.) Water Heater (includes expansion tank) Re -pipe - Drain, vent or water piping (each fixture served) Water Service Line (replacement or repair) For the installation, alteration, repair, addition or relocation of each: Water treating equipment (water softener)............................................................................................$35.00 Backflow protective device - 2" and smaller...........................................................................................$35.00 Backflow protective device - Over 2".......................................................................................................$45.00 Graywater system or reclaimed water system (in addition to fixture fee) ............................................$65.00 Non -grease waste pre-treatment interceptor (oil/waterseparator, etc.) ...........................................$110.00 Medical gas piping system serving 1 to 5 inlet/outlet(s) for a specific gas ..........................................$110.00 Each additional medical gas inlet/outlet...............................................................................................$15.00 Grease Trap (HGI Inside Building)............................................................................................................$220.00 Gravity Grease Interceptor(GGI))...........................................................................................................$770.00 OTHER FEES: Commercial plan review fee hourly fee............................................................................................$110.00/hr IMPACT FEES PARK IMPACT FEES: Single -Family ............................. Multi -Family .............................. Non -Residential Development Residential Administrative Fee . Commercial Administrative Fee TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES: $2,734.05 per Dwelling Unit $2,340.16 per Dwelling Unit ..........$1.34 per square foot ................................... $ 50.00 ................................ $100.00 Refer to City Code & Handouts to calculate impact fee. The following applies in addition to impact fee: Residential Administrative Fee..................................................................................................................$50.00 Commercial Administrative Fee.............................................................................................................. $100.00 Independent Fee Calculation —Transportation Engineer Review........................................................ $260.00 plus peer review fee as applicable. Page 5 of 1? Packet Pg. 476 1 I 9.2.c I GRADING PERMIT FEES PLAN REVIEW: CUBIC YARDS PLAN REVIEW FEE 50 cubic yards or less $55.00 (when located in a designated critical area) 51 to 100 cubic yards $110.00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $220.00 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $440.00 $440.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $110.00 for 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards each additional 10,000 yards or fraction thereof. $1,430.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $110.00 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 200,001 cubic yards or more $2,530.00 for the first 200,000 cubic yards, plus $110.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. PERMIT FEE: CUBIC YARDS PERMIT FEE Base Permit Fee $35.00 50 cubic yards or less $110.00 (when located in a designated critical area) 51 to 100 cubic yards $110.00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $110.00 for the first 100 cubic yards, plus $25.00 for each additional 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof. $335.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $45.00 for each 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards additional 1,000 cubic yards, or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $740.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $65.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. $1,325.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $100.00 for 100,001 cubic yards or more each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Page 6 of 12 Packet Pg. 477 1 I 9.2.c I FIRE PERMIT FEES FIRE SPRINKLER PERMITS: Residential IRC Structures New Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems................................................................................................. $300.00 Residential Fire Sprinkler System Alteration..........................................................................................$200.00 Commercial & Multi -Family Fire Sprinkler Systems Newsystems........................................................................................................................... $300.00 + TABLE 1 Modifications: 1 to 5 sprinklers........................................................................................................................................$250.00 6 to 25....................................................................................................................................................... $500.00 26 or more.............................................................................................................................. $300.00 + TABLE 1 Additional inspections/plan review as required................................................................................$110.00/hr FIRE ALARM PERMITS: New fire alarm system........................................................................................................... $300.00 + TABLE 1 Emergency Responders Radio System(DAS)........................................................................ $100.00 + TABLE 1 Modifications: 1 to 5 initiating devices, Communicator (AES, Cellular)....................................................................... $250.00 6 to 25, including panel replacement.....................................................................................................$500.00 26 or more.............................................................................................................................. $300.00 + TABLE 1 Additional inspections/plan review as required................................................................................$110.00/hr TANK PERMITS: Residential fill, remove or install (per each)...........................................................................................$200.00 Commercial fill, remove or install (per each).........................................................................................$450.00 OTHER FIRE PERMITS: Fire Suppression Systems: Commercial Hood Suppression System (per system)......................................................................$325.00 Standpipe............................................................................................................................................ $450.00 FireConnection........................................................................................................................................$500.00 FireOperational......................................................................................................................................$100.00 Fire fees include plan review and inspections. Page 7 of 1? Packet Pg. 478 1 I 9.2.c I PLANNING AND LAND USE FEES GENERAL: Type I (Staff decisions, no notice)............................................................................................................. $275.00 Type 11 A (Staff decisions with notice)....................................................................................................... $970.00 Type I I IA (ADB / Hearing Examiner)............................................................. Hearing Examiner Cost + $2,000.00 Type I I I B (Hearing Examiner)........................................................................ Hearing Examiner Cost + $2,000.00 Type IV (Rezone, Development Agreement)..........................................................................................$7,000.00 Type V (Plan & Edmonds Community Development Code Amendments) ............................................ $7,000.00 LotLine Adjustment................................................................................................................................$1,050.00 Short Subdivision Preliminary Approval................................................................................................$3,225.00 Short Subdivision Civil Plan Review.......................................................................................................$3,050.00 Short Subdivision Final Approval...........................................................................................................$1,590.00 Subdivision Preliminary Approval................................................................ Hearing Examiner Cost + $6,510.00 Subdivision Civil Plan Review.................................................................................................................$4,670.00 Subdivision Final Approval....................................................................................................................$1,590.00 ModificationRequest................................................................................................................................$970.00 Minor Change to Approved Plat............................................................................................................... $275.00 Major Change to Approved Plat....................................................................... Same as Original Application Fee PRD Preliminary Approval......................................................................................................................$6,510.00 PRDFinal Approval.................................................................................................................................$1,590.00 ADB Design Review —Signs ....................................................................................................................... $970.00 Staff Design Review if project exceeds SEPA threshold........................................................................... $970.00 Landscape Plan Inspection Fee......................................................................................................1% of Estimate SEPAReview...............................................................................................................................................$740.00 SEPA Planned Action Compliance Review (Hwy 99)................................................................................$275.00 EISReview........................................................................................................................................................ Cost Outdoor Dining, Amateur Radio............................................................................................................... $275.00 Critical Areas Checklist Application...........................................................................................................$110.00 Critical Areas Checklist Update...................................................................................................................$55.00 Critical Areas Variance / Reasonable Use Application ................................ Hearing Examiner Cost + $7,640.00 Critical Areas Study Admin................................................................................................ $110.00/hr (min. 1 hr) Critical Areas Contingent Review (See ECDC 23.40.195 for more detail on fees).................................$970.00 Shoreline Contingent Review (See ECDC 24.80.100)...............................................................................$970.00 Planning Fee not categorized Request for Reconsideration. $110.00/hr ..... $275.00 Note: When an application is heard by the Hearing Examiner (HE), the cost of the hearing is billed to the applicant. APPEALS: Appeal of Staff Decision (Type I, II or Hearing Examiner) Appeal of Type IIIB Decision to City Council ..................... Appeal of Notice of Civil Violation .................................... ADB = Architectural Design Board HE = Hearing Examiner SEPA = State Environmental Policy Act $450.00 $550.00 $970.00 EIS = Environmental Impact Statement PRD = Planned Residential Development Page 8of1� Packet Pg. 479 1 I 9.2.c I ENGINEERING FEES MISCELLANEOUS FEES: Backflow Prevention Compliance Fee .................................................... $165.00 Developers Agreements.......................................................................... $220.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees Fire/Aid Sign Address Fabrication Fee...............................................$100.00/ea Street Sign Fabrication Fee.................................................................$200.00/ea Water and Sewer Availability Letters...................................................$65.00/ea Latecomers Agreement............................................................................ $220.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees LID Sewer Agreement.............................................................................. $220.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees Variance from Underground Wiring ....................................................... $330.00 + $110.00/hr + City Attorney Fees Special Event Permit Fee (small event / less than 100 people) ............ $50.00/ea Special Event Permit Fee (major event / more than 100 people) ........... $125/ea GENERAL FACILITY CHARGES: • Water GFC's are based on meter size: Water and sewer GFC's shall be paid by each new customer connecting to the utility systems. Storm GFC's shall be paid by the applicant for ESU's added or created by development. Meter Size General Facility Charge %" $5,050.00 1" $12, 624.00 11/2 " $25,248.00 2" $40,397.00 GFC's for Single Family Residences only: Fee is based on meter size required for domestic demand (typically %") GFC shall not be based on meter upsizing for fire sprinkler system only. Sewer Utility GFC............................................................. $4,417.00 per ERU A single family residential development = 1.0 ERU per dwelling unit A multifamily residential development = .67 ERU per dwelling unit Applicants for non-residential development shall pay a GFC equal to the ERU determination that is made by the Public Works Director. Stormwater Management GFC..........................................$799.00 per ESU A single family residential development with up to 5,000 sf hard surface area = 1.0 ESU All other construction calculated according to a ratio of 1.0 ESU per 3,000 sq ft of new, replaced or new plus replaced impervious surface area. Page 9 of 12 Packet Pg. 480 1 I 9.2.c I RIGHT-OF-WAY FEES: Right -of -Way Construction Permit....................................$330.00 + Inspection Fees Right -of -Way Construction Permit —Small Wireless .......... $330.00 + $110/hour for any portion of an hour after the first three hours of staff review time + City Attorney Fees for legal review (if necessary) + Inspection Fees Right -of Way Minor Construction Permit .......................$110.00 + Inspection Fees Street Restoration for Water Meter Installation .........$1,000.00 + Street Overlay Cut Penalty Fee if applicable Street Overlay Cut Penalty Fee.......................................$220.00 + ROW Permit Fees + Add'I per SQYD charge times overlay cut multiplier Encroachment Permit......................................................$330.00 + Recording Fees Street Use Permit..............................................................$110.00 + Bistro Dining Fees if applicable Bistro Dining Fees...............................................................$30.00 Annual Fee + Monthly ROW Use Fee @ $0.50/ SO. FT x 12.84% (leasehold tax) Alley, Sidewalk, Parking Disruption/ Closure Fees ..........$220.00 + ROW Permit + Monthly Closure Fees Closure fees charged for any activity that occupies or closes, sidewalks, parking spaces(s), parking lanes(s) or other paved area of a street/road for more than 72 hours. Monthly portion of Fee [$ per month] = 1% of assessed value per square foot of abutting property x right of way area [SF] disrupted/closed. If disruption/closure affects any portion of the area of a parking space, the area of disruption closure is calculated based upon the area of a full parking space. SEWER FEES: New Commercial & Multi -Family New Single Family ........................ Repair - Full Line Replacement .... Repair - Partial Line Replacement Special Conditions (Grinder Pumps, Ejectors) Drainage Permit (Pool, Hot Tub, Jacuzzi)....... STORMWATER FEES: Stormwater Permit WATER METER FEES: General $220.00 + Inspection Fees Facility $110.00 + Inspection Fees Charges May Apply $110.00 + Inspection Fees $110.00 (Includes 1 inspection +Add'I Inspection Fees, if applicable) $110.00 + Sewer Fees + Utility Engineer Review .. $55.00 Each Occurrence $330.00 +General Inspection Fees Meter Size Meter Fee Installation of New Service & Meter* 3/4" $2,920.00 1" $2,970.00 1%" $6,220.00 2" $6,390.00 *General Facility Charges may apply GFC = General Facility Charge ESU = Equivalent Service Unit ROW = Right of Way ERU = Equivalent Residential Unit Page 10 of 1? Packet Pg. 481 1 I 9.2.c I ICC VALUATION TABLE August 2021 Adopted by City of Edmonds effective Jan 1, 2022 Group (2021 International Building Code) IA IB IIA 116 IIIA IIIB IV VA VB A-1 Assembly, theaters, with stage 298.55 288.43 280.93 269.54 253.09 245.77 260.87 235.34 226.84 A-1 Assembly, theaters, without stage 273.51 263.39 255.89 244.51 228.06 220.73 235.84 210.31 201.80 A-2 Assembly, nightclubs 233.39 226.42 220.85 211.80 199.64 194.14 204.26 180.65 174.48 A-2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet halls 232.39 225.42 218.85 210.80 197.64 193.14 203.26 178.65 173.48 A-3 Assembly, churches 276.84 266.72 259.22 247.83 231.83 225.68 239.17 214.08 205.57 A-3 Assembly, general, community halls, libraries, museums 231.62 221.50 213.00 202.61 185.16 178.84 193.94 167.42 159.91 A-4 Assembly, arenas 272.51 262.39 253.89 243.51 226.06 219.73 234.84 208.31 200.80 B Business 240.93 232.14 224.41 213.38 194.94 187.44 204.97 171.50 163.65 E Educational 253.16 244.50 238.07 227.82 212.65 201.92 219.97 185.88 180.09 F-1 Factory and industrial, moderate hazard 142.51 135.81 128.20 123.31 110.60 105.32 118.02 91.13 85.44 F-2 Factory and industrial, low hazard 141.51 134.81 128.20 122.31 110.60 104.32 117.02 91.13 84.44 H-1 High Hazard, explosives 133.05 126.35 119.74 113.85 102.42 96.14 108.56 82.95 0.00 H234 High Hazard 133.05 126.35 119.74 113.85 102.42 96.14 108.56 82.95 76.26 H-5 HPM 240.93 232.14 224.41 213.38 194.94 187.44 204.97 171.50 163.65 1-1 Institutional, supervised environment 240.35 232.11 225.21 216.12 198.77 193.28 216.40 178.22 172.87 1-2 Institutional, hospitals 403.60 394.81 387.08 376.05 356.54 0.00 367.65 333.11 0.00 1-2 Institutional, nursing homes 280.29 271.50 263.77 252.74 235.00 0.00 244.34 211.57 0.00 1-3 Institutional, restrained 273.98 265.19 257.46 246.43 229.58 221.08 238.03 206.14 196.29 1-4 Institutional, day care facilities 240.35 232.11 225.21 216.12 198.77 193.28 216.40 178.22 172.87 M Mercantile 174.08 167.12 160.55 152.50 140.10 135.60 144.96 121.12 115.94 R-1 Residential, hotels 242.77 234.53 227.63 218.55 200.90 195.42 218.82 180.35 175.00 R-2 Residential, multiple family 203.34 195.11 188.20 179.12 162.64 157.15 179.40 142.08 136.73 R-3 Residential, one- and two-family 189.34 184.22 179.47 175.04 169.94 163.79 172.07 157.66 148.33 R-4 Residential, care/assisted living facilities 240.35 232.11 225.21 216.12 198.77 193.28 216.40 178.22 172.87 S-1 Storage, moderate hazard 132.05 125.35 117.74 112.85 100.42 95.14 107.56 80.95 75.26 S-2 Storage, low hazard 131.05 124.35 117.74 111.85 100.42 94.14 106.56 80.95 74.26 U Utility, miscellaneous 104.03 98.14 92.46 88.40 79.71 73.77 84.55 62.84 59.88 Square Foot Construction Costs a, b, ` a. Private Garages use Utility, miscellaneous b. For shell only buildings deduct20 percent c. N.P. = not permitted d. Unfinished basements (Group R-3) _ $23.20 persq. ft. e. Carport = $25.00 per sq. ft. f. Sunroom (unheated) _ $28.00 g. Deck, Ramp, Stairs, Trellis, Porch = $20.00 per sq. ft. h. Dock = $35.00 per sq. ft. i. Unheated Storage = $25.00 per sq. ft. Page 11 of 1'' Packet Pg. 482 1 I 9.2.c I VALUATION BASED BUILDING PERMIT FEES TABLE 1 Total Valuation** Residential Commercial $1 to $500 $100 Base fee + $30 $100 Base fee + $36 $100 Base fee + $30 for the first $500 + $3 for $100 Base fee + $36 for the first $500 + $3.60 for $501 to $2,000 each additional $100, or fraction thereof to and each additional $100, or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 including $2,000 $100 Base fee + $75 for the first $2,001 + $14 for $100 Base fee + $90 for the first $2,001 + $16.80 $2,001 to $25,000 each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to and for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to including $25,000 and including $25,000 $25,001 to $100 Base fee + $400 for the first $25,001 + $10 $100 Base fee + $480 for the first $25,001 + $12 $50,000 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 and including $50,000 $50,001 to $100 Base fee + $650 for the first $50,001 + $7 $100 Base fee + $780 for the first $50,001 + $8.40 $100,000 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 and including $100,000 $100,001 to $100 Base fee + $1,000 for the first $100,001 + $100 Base fee + $1,200 for the first $100,001 + $500,000 $6 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof $7.20 for each additional $1,000, or fraction to and including $500,000 thereof to and including $500,000 $500,001 to $100 Base fee + $3,400 for the first $500,001 + $100 Base fee + $4,080 for the first $500,001 + $6 $1,000,000 $5 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof to to and including $1,000,000 and including $1,000,000 $1,000,001 and $100 Base fee + $5,900 for the first $1,000,000 + $100 Base fee + $7,080 for the first $1,000,000 + up $4 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof $4.80 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof The Building Valuation Data table shall be updated on January 1st of each year to the latest version as published by ICC. **See Valuation Table located on previous page. TABLE 1 -VALUATION BASED APPLICABLE PERMITS: Commercial Structures: New, Additions & Remodels Garages & Carports Residential Structures: New, Additions & Remodels Swimming Pools (In -Ground) Accessory Structures (Greenhouse/Shed) Cell Communications/ Cellular Facilities Deck, Stairs, Ramps Other permits types as determined Commercial: Hot/Tub and Spas, Solar/ Photovoltaic Systems, Re -roofs & Tenant Improvements Plus: $6.50 Residential State Surcharge Fee per permit and $2 per each dwelling unit $25.00 Commercial State Surcharge Fee per permit and $2 per each dwelling unit Page 12 of 12 Packet Pg. 483 1 9.2.d PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING September 14, 2021 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Councilmember Kristiana Johnson 1. CALL TO ORDER Staff Participating Virtually Emily Wagener, HR Analyst Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPP Committee meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Councilmember Fraley-Monillas. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Audio/Visual Assistant Job Description Ms. Wagener explained the City has long retained an employee via an employment agreement as an administrative assistant in charge of audio/video recording for City Council and Planning Board meetings. Historically, this position has been employed through an employment contract with 2-year terms. Human Resources has reviewed and updated the related job description and compensation and the job description is ready to be reviewed and approved. Once approved, the employee currently working in this position will be transitioned to the hourly wage scale and future employee agreements will no longer be necessary. A brief discussion followed regarding why this position was being transitioned from an employment contract to an employee. Action: Consent Agenda 2. Special Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Title 4 Licenses Mr. Passey explained this proposal has been in the works for years, was delayed due to a lack of events as a result of COVID and now there is renewed interest in special events permitting. The City's special event program has been handled administratively in the past and there was no adopted City code outlining the process or criteria for issuing permits. The purpose is to establish a formal process for permitting special events that impact City right-of-way, public property and other facilities or services. He described the interdepartmental effort to research and draft the code as well as efforts to research and compare other cities' codes and procedures. Another goal of the special event permit code is to distinguish it from events partially or fully sponsored by the City which are governed by a formal agreement that is approved by the Council. Special event permits are smaller events not sponsored by the City such as neighborhood block parties, benefit walks, store's customer events, etc. Staff also cleaned up outdated and obsolete code provisions in Title 4 regarding licenses, updated ECC 4.72 Business Licenses to reflect the city's partnership with the State of Washington Department of Licensing, and updated Chapter 4.98 Constitutionally Protected Events, to address the need for flexibility regarding certain constitutionally protected spontaneous demonstrations. If the Council adopts the new special event permit code, staff recommends adoption of a resolution adding permit fees to the City's Fee Schedule, consistent with the policy of recovering costs associated with reviewing and issuing city permits. Staff proposes a $50 permit fee for events with less than 100 Packet Pg. 484 9.2.d 09/14/21 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 2 people and $125 for events over 100 people which is similar to fees charged by other cities. Tonight's presentation is intended as an introduction with a future presentation to full Council. Discussion followed regarding whether street -side fruit vendors were required to have a business license, the City Council's role other than adoption of the special event permit policy and fee schedule, a suggestion for a third fee for events with less than 50 people such as block parties, intent of the fee to cover staff time to review impacts, ways to disseminate information to the public about the need for a permit, ADA requirements for special events, adult entertainment locations, and a suggestion to conferring with Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss and Diversity Commission VC Dean Olson regarding ADA requirements. N Action: Presentation to full Council. N c as 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 5:22 p.m. Packet Pg. 485