The URL can be used to link to this page

2022-06-21 City Council - Full Agenda-3205Op E D o Agenda Edmonds City Council tnl. }nyo REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 JUNE 21, 2022, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. PRESENTATIONS 1. Community Transit Update (25 min) 2. Resolution Commending Student Representative to City Council (5 min) 5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO Edmonds City Council Agenda June 21, 2022 Page 1 THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Geraldine Sturgeon and Alegria Albers (0 min) 2. April 2022 Monthly Financial Report (0 min) 3. Council Appointment to a Board/Commission (0 min) 4. Written Public Comments (0 min) 8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2022 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2022 3. Approval of Council Committee Minutes 4. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 14, 2022 5. Approval of claim checks. 6. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 7. Resolution Commending Student Representative to City Council 8. Ordinance to Add Human Services to PSPP Committee 9. Opioid Settlement Participation Form 10. Employment Agreement - Executive Assistant to City Council 11. Approval of Right of Entry and Maintenance Agreement between City of Edmonds and property owner at 21000 Highway 99 12. Approve Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas related to design services for Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project. 13. Approve Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas related to construction management services for Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project. 14. Approve Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas for 76th Ave and 220th Ave Intersection Improvements Project. 15. Approval of Professional Service Agreement for Design Services for the Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades 16. Approve Select Homes 7918 203rd St SW 10-foot Right -of -Way Dedication 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Resolution Adopting Findings of Fact in Support of Interim Design Standards for Multifamily -only Buildings in the BD2 zone (15 min) 2. Ordinance amending ECC 1.05.010 regarding remote participation by board and commission members (10 min) 3. Missing Middle Grant Application (30 min) 4. Ordinance amending ECC 5.27.210 regarding Fireworks Fines (20 min) 5. Tree Code Amendments (20 min) 6. Presentation of 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements Project Update (20 min) 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Agenda June 21, 2022 Page 2 ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda June 21, 2022 Page 3 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Community Transit Update Staff Lead: Community Transit Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History Community Transit provides periodic updates to the City Council. Recommendation N/A. For information only. Narrative This update will include Community Transit's service priorities, goals, options, outreach, and project schedule. Attachments: Community Transit Presentation Packet Pg. 4 Edmonds City Council June 21, 2022 0- r Community Transit Update Ric Ilgenfritz, CEO Roland Behee, Director of Planning and Development Agency P O riorities N C fC • Focus on ridership and safety • Regional integration, o Orange Line development o R • Service innovation y L • Zero emissions fleet study • Long range plan • 2024 network planning r c m E t r a Packet Pg. 6 'Irisom: Link Light Rail Arrives Allows Community Transit to redesign transit in Snohomish County Unprecedented mobility opportunities Travel made easy for all 4.1.a 2024 Development Process c mo munity � transit �� 2024 F, -1 2024 Service Goals & Initial Research/Inputs L i Phase 1 Outreach Service concepts, early input Phase 2 Outreach Draft network, refined input 2020-2021 Q3-Q4 2021 Q1-Q2 2022 Q3-Q4 2022 Community Transit Board Approves 2024 Network Plan Packet Pg. 8 4.1.a 2024 Service Goals 'Al Connect Bus to Light Rail "N c mo munity � transit �� 2024 ILI J Access to ant Service Adjust to Changing Market Focus on Equitable Access r Q Packet Pg. 9 ..W IPWI �o- CT 800 series buses ST 510 bus ST 511, 512, 513 buses O00 ST 1 Line (Link) ST N Line (Sounder) O I] Major stop or destination N 4.1.a Marysville Lake Stevens O Everett +: to y mont L fMcCollum h Everett H Park O � Silvei E Firs E O ay V II O Mill Creek o 1 .Yy NCJ OO� a+ C N Station O -Y P&R L �1 a Canyon Park L Mountlake Terrace H C E �i f� U c m Roosevelt E t VU District To Snohomish University of Q Washington Capitol Hill Downtown Seattle To SeaTac Packet Pg. 10 Expanded Frequent Service • Swift Blue Line —Strategic extension to Shoreline North/185th St. • Swift Orange Line — New Bus Rapid Transit service between Lynnwood and Mill Creek • Swift Green Line — Continue service level and leverage new connections • Transit emphasis corridor focus for other frequent routes c mo mul! tY � transit �� 2024 kTALlIrAl 4 191, e LYNNWOOD EDMONDSO11r COLLEGE EDMONDS ) AU RORA M LLAGE TRANSIT CENTER 4 SHORELINE71 ARLINGTON SMOKEY POINT TRANSIT CENTER r °w�LAJcEE" MARYSVILLE TULALIP V HWYM o� EVERETTEYERETr STATI OM ?Ln SEAWAY TRANSIT CENTER _ 1281h St P 132nd St U111111140�r MtCOLLUMPARK I I ' a1 PARK&RIDE MILL CREEK ASH WAY t PARK aRIDE. 1611111Q] 11110 --Y _ +.164th St LAKE STEVENS SNOHOMISH ") IIIIIIIfQ LYNNWOOD Z TRANSIT CENTER Hwy 524 f41Ql1NTLAME` CANYONPARK / TERRACE PARK&RIDE M OU NTLAKE TERRACE `+ TRANS fTCENTER BOTHELL 5NOHOMISHCOUNTY 1411� KING COUNTY UW 90THELL II NE 185th St Swift 1111 Swift Blue Line extension (planned for20241 M Swift Green Line ME Swift Orange Lin (planned for 2024) Swift Gold Line "m (planned for2027) 1111 Future Swift Linn In. Transit EmphasL Corridors N C i ST2 Link Light R; L (planned for 2024) ++ ST3 Bus Rapid Ti 3 (planned for2025) E EO moon ST3 Link Light R; (planned for2036) V p Transit Center c O :1 Q Transit Center 9 with Link Station y N L a H ]NROE C 3 E O c V R r-+ Packet Pg. 11 Q Swift Orange Line A ...- C Swift Station bus stops in both directions Swift Station bus stops only in this direction O Shared Swift Station 0 Parking available ® Link Station co ummco nnytraIn ■ 15 new buses ■ New transit center at Edmonds College ■ 19 platform stations TO SEAWAY TRANSIT CENTER '%Vf P TO EVERETT STATION 1281h St SW McCOLLUM PARK i PARK & RIDE 3 MILL: CREEK- Qy �a TOWN: z4a ao3 CENTER, M ASH WAY SWAMP CREEK PARK & RIDE.; PARK & RIDE O '® O 168th St SW o 172nd St SW 3a LYNNWOOD a� J 1801h St SW Maple Rd a' ■ Redesigned transit center at McCollum Park P&R 3 3 3 3 3 184th h StSt SW M S a' ■ New speed and reliability infrastructure EDMONDS 200th St SW O 'COLLEGE 204thstsw •'r LYNNWOOD 208th St SW . CITY CENTER STATION (2024) TO SHORELINE NORTH/ 185TH STATION (2024)1 je TO SEATTLE EVERETT 132nd St d I f3 Trillium Blvd MILL CREEK L 153rd St SE C Mill Creek Rd G U 0 r .. L :7 i 3 TO CANYON P E +PARK&RIDE E O U r c m Eleven mile long corridor serving Mill Creek Town Center, Alderwood Mall, Edmonds College, and Lynnwood TC, connecting Swift to the Blue `c mo munity transit �� Line, Green Line and light rail. 2024 Packet Pg. 12 f 4.1.a ca umm nitytransi 22OK- 20OK- 180K, 160K- 140K' 120K- Y 100K, 80K 60K' 40K' 2OK OK Community Transit Historical Weekly Boardings Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov j[-c ■ 2019 ■ 2020 ■ 2021 ■ 2022 Excludes weeks with less than 7 days in one year. Community Tranrit 2019 to 2022 r Q Packet Pg. 13 6 ELI h%-5 IP oil 1:. V .6- r Edrnotids StatiOn A - -- EDHOONDS 2016 'A 6% Arm s New service options `c mo munity transit 2024 1�1 TF TTTT� -T • On demand transit service within specified area • Accessed via technology • Flexible stops and destinations • Lynnwood Pilot Project E a Packet Pg. 15 Prioritize Service to Equity Populations Equity has a prominent role in analysis, used in conjunction with ridership and population. Analysis includes: • Population living below 200% of the Federal Poverty Line ($34.5k, 2-person household, 2020) • Population that is Foreign -born • Communities of Color and Latinx/e Populations • Limited English -Speaking Households • Population Living with a Disability C R10C MU!9 ll transit-� 2024 !e ,90783C Cr Packet Pg. 16 4.1.a Outreach Process • Online survey available 11/15 — 12/20, 976 responses • 15 meetings with Community -Based Organizations, agencies, and community partners • 25 in -person outreach events • 2 live virtual sessions • Intentional focus on populations that we may not have reached in the past • Opportunity for input in our top -five Title VI languages • Equity in our outreach to match equity in future service design Packet Pg. 17 a 4.1.a Feedback on service addition priorities • Slight preference for more neighborhood and local service • "More neighborhood service, to local destinations in Snohomish County" (52.7%) • "More service to transit centers that connect you to Seattle and Bellevue" (47.3%) • Preference for more weekday service balanced between midday, morning, and later than current service • 71% prefer Weekday additions • 17% Saturdays • 12% Sundays c munity . transit-J 2024 • 26% prefer more Middle of the Day service • 21% prefer more Morning service • 19% prefer more service Later than current service a Packet Pg. 18 4.1.a Project Schedule I I I 1 I 1 I Detailed Service Design Jan/Mar 2022 `c mo munity transit 2024 Partner Agency Outreach Winter 2022 I I I I I I I i Phase 2 External Outreach Apr/May 2022 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Board Adoption Target Date Dec 1, 2022 Further Service Design Summer 2022 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I Implementation 2023-2024 I I I I I I I Link Opening Mid 2024 a Packet Pg. 19 4.1.a u est Ilk ions v Comments `c mo munity transit 2024 Packet Pg. 20 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Resolution Commending Student Representative to City Council Staff Lead: Council President Vivian Olson Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Student volunteers are important to the fabric and character of the City of Edmonds. We are grateful to Brook Roberts, who served two terms as City Council Student Representative from September 2020- June 2021 and September 2021-June 2022. Staff Recommendation Consider and support the proposed resolution. Narrative Today we commend Brook Roberts for his dedication to the City of Edmonds. Attachments: Resolution Commending Brook Roberts Packet Pg. 21 4.2.a Resolution No: A Resolution Of The Edmonds City Council Commending Brook Roberts for Service as a Student Representative To The Edmonds City Council Whereas, Brook Roberts, a student_ at Shorewood High School, volunteered to serve as a Student Representative of the Edmonds City Council; and 'Iti Whereas, Mr. Roberts served as a student member of the City Council for two terms; September 2020 — June 2021, and September 2021 - June 2022; and - i J Whereas, Mr. Roberts strived to advocate for equity in issues facing Edmonds' youth, and offered a conduit between Council and the Edmonds 'KSWth Commission where he also served; and Whereas, He was enthusiastic and worked diligently on the Suicide Prevention Campaign, facilitated a speaker presentation on Rank Choice voting, and helped in sharing information about the use of pronouns in City-wide communications. Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved, that the City Council and the Mayor hereby extend their best wishes to Brook and his future endeavors and express the hope that he will continue to contribute to the democratic process of government in the City of Edmonds and elsewhere. Passed, Approved, and Adopted this 21 st day of June, 2022. Mike Nelson, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember J -- " Susan Paine, CouncilmImbfj Scott Passey, City Clerk Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember Packet Pg. 22 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Geraldine Sturgeon and Alegria Albers Staff Lead: NA Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Geraldine Sturgeon and Alegria Albers Narrative Geraldine Sturgeon 7905 199th St SW (TBD) Alegria Albers 3rd Ave S & Main Street (TBD) Attachments: 22-0870 - Sturgeon, Geraldine - Claim for Damages - for council Albers, Alegria - Claim for Damages - for council Packet Pg. 23 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Formf ';r Received by City "-'VU who currently resides at Please take note that L maili ddress _ home phone o , work phone # , and who resided at _ at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is _ _ is claiming damages against i r� C E1 ��'''r 1 d 1'iL- in the sum of $ LA)- Xe3n"��rr>cS�arising out of the following circumstances listed below. M 0 DATE OF OCCURRENCE: , pp TIME: �� -� �' o LOCATION OF OCCURRE CE:%_� 1 L] C �' f� rl (G/ E DESCRIPTION: U 1. D scribe the conduct and circumstance that bro ght about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. kJU ti ' Cv o CC R.C- -1 cir, (-Q G Q v L C) . CL t r 4 a { tt h`a}n eA heet for additio! infor tion, n d�ed�) E . r.....e.i. 6 iti` r.a.,, o i. pii,Ainn nmmnc nrlrirnccoc and nhnna niiminpmt'" 2. Pro ide a I' of witnesses, if ap o 0 E .2 U 3. Attach copies oO�dacumentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No R a- If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: 0 and the policy #: o� * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY License Plate # Driver License #00 0 Type Auto: N (year) (make (model) N DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: E t Phone#: Phone#: r Q Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 24 7.1.a This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Claimant Date and place (residentiaA address, city ap# county)1 Or M 0 L O Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) E .2 U Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 25 • 7.1. b CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that . /-jV61kI Q WO A KR'� who currently resides at mailing address 5A H I^ r home phone # , work phone # N1 A , and who resided at - ' Slk HE cL5 a-6Ve at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is is claiming damages against G i Ty d r 5 t>M O(gJ) S in the sum of $ B D arising out of the following circumstances listed below. (bayed 11 ae�lta- chr1J>�8�� in DATE OF OCCURRENCE: R TUO e J [O aa- TIME: a4;P rOY- LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: A Ve S ne a,t, RAIN 5f • 'r� M of s Lkla � cc DESCRIPTION: L 0 E 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also dQscribe the injury or qamage. Y ' + 1:#eA -p--arKiviq tot z Gann m etr ca- ,,c is t;w r n 3 Atle S � v<. v-Vz-1-fv—c-t� On � a.CLo . S- faaL c �Il"4- v GJKGc r�'n c1M LLh e ¢.v1 U�'_Cv #J -4-h e --5i e'V W Y1i L ft.r p A eti e.vci'fe � ect4r G 4c'/nCiv v y,Ary wkfn �� cl��coda :.� rtn �oA-+ ci t a Crv�v-,4 e r-<,vl ay.d CA o (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) '~ rn m 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. No Wt4oe, 4 �eCe_ ar0LLYN bw e tne.�4� cl lo�� ic�wfe� vtn E p VX �d Q �7 dIl7E �F 1� W �= C CL ` -6 c- L p� lit x a i t v1 i t ¢h. v7 c i 2 Y-t4 , 11 �z.Je v' 1n c�•>n Y e i t .Q.. 4'r L o Ve i rn 1c �C�� vr1 cult vaa c ev1 ak V,11 urn [ lKa ice I T o " "A D OA o rv, a v'" E 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or stimates for repair. 5e� C'M'W—fed -• sov'vq Ifie� us�re- +cz,k¢0 2� hnr a44er trlCtr1a 0f t� 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No `x z 2 Y Ct Uril CLSi�y,n Or b iV'Vt o Ie.�SQ I(i'1 e rii [r Y1'r c�2vt R QIy L v1 5 tt5 v C -t•i'� f If so, p! se b[ov de a nt ethe suran� rampjny: �1 c� a e. Yla'" CO d e C 5t zx 4c, ia-k and the Olicy W-, JAEt plaA e-V1+ w\le g L * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: I D Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 26 This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foreaoino is true and correct. l w( " 13 az - l�cvw5l� lilghbture of Claimant Date and Alace (residential address, city and county) Or Signature of Representative Print Name of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5tn Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at a� E c� 0 L 0 E .2 U c 0 U L 0 m a� E 0 0 L0 E M U ca Q N L Q r E V r a Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 27 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 April 2022 Monthly Financial Report Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Sarah Mager Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation No action needed; informational only. Narrative April 2022 Monthly Financial Report Attachments: April 2022 Monthly Financial Report Packet Pg. 28 I 7.2.a I OF EDP � d lac. 1 $9v CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT AP RI L 2022 Packet Pg. 29 1 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY I 7.2.a I Agency/ Investment Issuer Type FFCB Bonds Energy Northwest Bonds Energy Northwest Bonds Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA Bonds Grant Cnty WA Bonds Grant Cnty WA Bonds Seattle WA Muni Bonds FHLMC Bonds FHLB Bonds First Financial - ECA CD Kent WA Bonds FNMA Bonds Spokane County WA Bonds First Financial - Waterfront Center CD TOTAL SECURITIES Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool TOTAL PORTFOLIO City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail As of April 30, 2022 Years Purchase to Par Price 1,998,548 1,466,077 260,748 948,084 1,517,955 576,332 2,224,500 988,678 1,996,590 2,803,516 286,648 992,693 207,260 1,575,000 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.59 0.67 0.67 0.76 0.97 1.43 1.55 1.59 2.18 2.59 5.51 Value 2,000,000 1,345,000 250,000 855,000 1,500,000 520,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,803,516 250,000 1,000,000 200,000 1,575,000 Market Value 2,002,836 1,353,137 250,640 871,459 1,496,940 531,196 2,048,760 983,724 1,947,606 2,803,516 260,825 980,595 196,038 1,575,000 Maturity Date 06/14/22 07/01 /22 07/01 /22 12/01 /22 01 /01 /23 01 /01 /23 02/01 /23 04/20/23 10/05/23 11/15/23 12/01 /23 07/02/24 12/01 /24 11 /01 /27 Coupon Rate 1.88% 5.00% 2.95% 5.00% 1.54% 5.00% 5.00% 0.38% 0.22% 2.08% 5.00% 1.75% 2.10% 0.20% 17, 842, 627 1.36 17,298, 516 17, 302, 272 12,499,942 12,499,942 Demand 0.41% 42,666,548 42,666,548 Demand 1.06% $ 72,465,007 $ 72,468,762 Kent WA, Issuer Diversification Seattle 1% WA Muni, Mason & 12% Kitsap Cnty— WA, 5% Financial - CD, 25% Grant Cnty J I Spokane WA, 12% FHLB, 12% County FFCB, WA, 1% 12% Energy Northwest, FHLMC, 6% 9% FNMA, 6% Checking, Cash and Investment Balances $2.3 , 3%� (in $ Millions) Bonds, State LGIP, CD's, $4.4, $12.9, 17% $12.5, 17% 6% County LGIP, $42.7, 57% O N C C ILL A L r C O 2 N N O N IZ Q O Q d R U C C ILL t C O Z N N O N �L Q Q t to Q 1 Packet Pg. 30 1 I 7.2.a I INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Annual Interest Income $1,400, 000 $1,236,875 $1,200, 000 $1,000,000 $882556 947 931 $950,684 $800,000 $635,781 $600,000 $400,000 317 581 $200,000 $- 2017 2018 201 2020 2021 YTD 2022 2 Packet Pg. 31 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY I 7.2.a I General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months) General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenses 10,000, 000 — 9,000,000 T 8,000,000 7,000, 000 6,000,000 • 5,000,000 4,000, 000 3,000,000 2,000, 000 1,000, 000 • May August November February May August November February General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 through 2021) Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 12,000, 000 10,000, 000 8,000, 000 6,000,000 4,000, 000 2,000,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000, 000 2,500,000 2,000, 000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 General Fund Tax Revenue (2022 YTD) $965,094 $384,002 Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax $2,838,603 Other Taxes 3 Packet Pg. 32 1 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2022 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 2,486,429 $ 2,486,429 $ 2,291,020 -7.86% February 4,917,170 2,430,740 4,711,093 -4.19% March 7,380,020 2,462,851 7,394,990 0.20% April 10,516,012 3,135,992 10,451,247 -0.62% May 19,357,334 8,841,322 June 21,935,611 2,578,276 July 24,465,539 2,529,929 August 27,084,819 2,619,280 September 29,465,113 2,380,294 October 33,512,944 4,047,830 November 42,090,496 8,577,552 December 44,640,708 2,550,212 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2022 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 381,097 $ 381,097 $ 377,895 -0.84% February 611,562 230,465 620,392 1.44% March 952,142 340,580 793,926 -16.62% April 1,227,434 275,291 1,165,930 -5.01% May 1,586,772 359,339 June 1,961,879 375,106 July 2,368,248 406,370 August 2,810,074 441,826 September 3,256,638 446,564 October 3,660,486 403,848 November 4,056,561 396,075 December 4,400,000 343,439 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. r Q w Packet Pg. 33 1 SALES TAX SUMMARY I 7.2.a I Construction Trade, $511,594 Accodation, $11,773 \ Clothing and Accessories, $114,237 - Communications, $83,732 Wholesale Trade, $119,688 Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: Apirl 2022 Year -to -Date Total $3,469,412 Automotive Repair, $75,096 Health & Amusement & Personal Care, Recreation, $23,3044 $96,197 Misc Retail, $643,055 Business Services, $403,478 Gasoline, $10,375 Retail Food Stores, $112,977 Retail Automotive, $809,471 _A Others, $54,026 Eating & Drinking Manufacturing, $40,790 $359,619 Annual Sales Tax Revenue 12,000, 000 $10,302,518 10,000, 000 $7,395,114 $8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046 8,000,000 6,905,122 6,000,000 $3,469,412 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 2016 2017 2018 201 2020 2021 YTD 2022 5 I Packet Pg. 34 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2022 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 763,651 $ 763,651 $ 857,872 12.34% February 1,704,609 940,958 1,853,000 8.71% March 2,420,254 715,646 2,666,259 10.16% April 3,074,639 654,384 3,469,412 12.84% May 3,893,081 818,442 June 4,672,507 779,426 July 5,523,403 850,896 August 6,439,084 915,680 September 7,293,649 854,565 October 8,203,996 910,347 November 9,139,425 935,429 December 10,000,000 860,575 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2022 Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 79,399 $ 79,399 $ 96,596 21.66% February 164,205 84,806 96,596 -41.17% March 246,125 81,920 305,138 23.98% April 313,860 67,734 397,808 26.75% May 367,416 53,556 June 402,173 34,757 July 429,975 27,802 August 452,332 22,357 September 472,668 20,335 October 496,035 23,367 November 534,998 38,963 December 595,000 60,002 Gas Utility Tax 700,000 600,000 500,000 - 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O N C M C LL t C O 2 N N O N �L CL Q O CL C M a LL z C O 2 N N O N �L a C N E t t) M r r Q 6 Packet Pg. 35 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2022 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 53,352 $ 53,352 $ 43,844 -17.82% February 96,981 43,629 66,255 -31.68% March 143,255 46,275 130,244 -9.08% April 192,397 49,142 175,045 -9.02% May 232,481 40,084 June 277,770 45,288 July 321,046 43,277 August 362,710 41,663 September 400,099 37,389 October 445,363 45,264 November 482,039 36,676 December 523,000 40,961 Electric Utility Tax Telephone Utility Tax 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 148,905 $ 148,905 $ 183,023 22.91% February 312,488 163,583 377,116 20.68% March 449,608 137,121 534,798 18.95% April 602,286 152,678 726,969 20.70% May 723,393 121,107 June 824,492 101,099 July 920,639 96,147 August 1,015,921 95,282 September 1,108,535 92,614 October 1,199,070 90,535 November 1,299,972 100,902 December 1,410,000 110,028 Electric Utility Tax 1,zsuu,uuu 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. Packet Pg. 36 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2022 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 809,979 $ 809,979 $ 827,704 2.19% February 1,383,405 573,426 1,383,308 -0.01% March 2,213,219 829,814 2,127,271 -3.88% April 2,744,029 530,810 2,688,719 -2.02% May 3,542,697 798,668 June 4,167,857 625,160 July 5,138,308 970,451 August 5,986,736 848,427 September 7,133,311 1,146,575 October 7,954,825 821,514 November 8,891,706 936,881 December 9,464,783 573,077 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2022 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 426,464 $ 426,464 $ 417,730 -2.05% February 1,352,938 926,475 1,322,856 -2.22% March 1,779,789 426,851 1,740,623 18.95% April 2,159,443 379,654 2,114,167 20.70% May 2,586,880 427,437 June 2,966,444 379,564 July 3,385,868 419,425 August 4,311,526 925,657 September 4,738,766 427,240 October 5,118,192 379,426 November 5,545,860 427,668 December 5,911,497 365,637 Storm Water Sales 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget - Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O N C M C LL t C O 2 N tV O tV �L a Q O CIL C M c LL 21 z r C O 2 N N O tV �L a C N E t t) R r r Q Packet Pg. 37 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2022 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 863,521 $ 863,521 $ 877,046 1.57% February 1,571,494 707,973 1,604,010 2.07% March 2,435,565 864,071 2,451,231 0.64% April 3,143,499 707,934 3,183,083 1.26% May 4,009,811 866,312 June 4,719,932 710,121 July 5,593,564 873,631 August 6,307,925 714,362 September 7,215,145 907,220 October 7,936,868 721,723 November 8,819,637 882,769 December 9,528,089 708,452 EL O N t4 C fC C LL _A L a+ C O 2 N N O N Q Q O rL d R U C C LL t C O 2 N N O N 'L Q Q Q *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 9 Packet Pg. 38 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2022 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 5,342,528 $ 5,342,528 $ 4,601,625-13.87% February 9,225,120 3,882,592 8,134,057-11.83% March 13,453,045 4,227,925 11,966,023-11.05% April 17,154,891 3,701,846 15,469,533 -9.82% May 21,081,164 3,926,273 June 25,953,408 4,872,244 July 30,083,274 4,129,866 August 33,991,194 3,907,920 September 38,121,718 4,130,524 October 42,646,764 4,525,046 November 47,397,312 4,750,547 December 52,360,872 4,963,560 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2022 Non -Departmental Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 2,508,279 $ 2,508,279 $ 2,099,939 -16.28% February 3,543,187 1,034,908 2,938,380 -17.07% March 4,861,868 1,318,681 4,088,791 -15.90% April 5,666,194 804,326 5,036,007 -11.12% May 6,662,820 996,625 June 8,507,675 1,844,856 July 9,572,392 1,064,717 August 10,448,509 876,116 September 11,463,698 1,015,189 October 12,742,850 1,279,152 November 14,166,478 1,423,628 December 15,574,121 1,407,643 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 10 Packet Pg. 39 1 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2022 City Council Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 33,985 $ 33,985 $ 23,687 -30.30% February 71,308 37,323 43,670 -38.76% March 112,128 40,821 71,408 -36.32% April 150,174 38,046 100,819 -32.87% May 199,408 49,234 June 253,207 53,799 July 291,886 38,679 August 345,215 53,328 September 382,380 37,165 October 414,981 32,601 November 455,321 40,340 December 497,900 42,579 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2022 Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 36,522 $ 36,522 $ 28,255 -22.63% February 74,639 38,117 59,226 -20.65% March 111,240 36,600 89,568 -19.48% April 148,486 37,247 119,372 -19.61% May 185,158 36,671 June 221,111 35,953 July 257,901 36,789 August 295,030 37,129 September 331,738 36,709 October 367,805 36,067 November 405,747 37,941 December 443,913 38,166 Office of Mayor 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-CurrentYeaz Budget --*-PriorYeaz *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 11 Packet Pg. 40 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2022 Human Resources Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 77,402 $ 77,402 $ 59,932 -22.57% February 141,639 64,236 135,524 -4.32% March 202,815 61,176 203,581 0.38% April 266,756 63,941 270,474 1.39% May 331,195 64,439 June 405,872 74,678 July 464,145 58,273 August 524,126 59,981 September 590,408 66,282 October 654,662 64,254 November 726,800 72,138 December 824,831 98,031 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2022 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 104,268 $ 104,268 $ 91,643 -12.11% February 213,906 109,638 187,919 -12.15% March 322,490 108,584 284,025 -11.93% April 431,592 109,102 386,046 -10.55% May 548,505 116,913 June 654,584 106,079 July 763,667 109,084 August 884,110 120,443 September 995,910 111,800 October 1,110,987 115,077 November 1,227,059 116,072 December 1,368,755 141,696 Municipal Court 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-CurrentYeaz Budget -m-PriorYear *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 12 Packet Pg. 41 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2022 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 49,857 $ 49,857 $ 33,127 -33.56% February 103,113 53,256 72,230 -29.95% March 155,568 52,455 122,479 -21.27% April 205,451 49,882 179,118 -12.82% May 260,752 55,301 June 315,986 55,234 July 373,132 57,147 August 434,777 61,645 September 492,000 57,223 October 552,240 60,239 November 622,590 70,351 December 719,388 96,798 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 13 Packet Pg. 42 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund 2022 Technology Rental Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 176,962 $ 176,962 $ 216,858 22.55% February 334,966 158,004 287,295 -14.23% March 484,397 149,431 502,978 3.84% April 566,805 82,408 545,022 -3.84% May 674,037 107,232 June 784,541 110,504 July 877,847 93,306 August 989,174 111,327 September 1,106,217 117,044 October 1,245,373 139,155 November 1,341,722 96,350 December 1,539,022 197,300 Administrative Services Technology Rental Fund 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Year Budget -d Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services 2022 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 238,721 $ 238,721 $ 217,022 -9.09% February 399,953 161,232 380,532 -4.86% March 563,330 163,378 547,460 -2.82% April 729,233 165,903 722,690 -0.90% May 896,198 166,965 June 1,121,628 225,430 July 1,314,351 192,723 August 1,478,599 164,248 September 1,647,511 168,911 October 1,824,204 176,693 November 1,989,608 165,404 December 2,156,911 167,303 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 14 Packet Pg. 43 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2022 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 80,982 $ 80,982 $ 77,656 -4.11% February 161,963 80,982 155,234 -4.16% March 242,945 80,982 233,065 -4.07% April 323,927 80,982 287,018 -11.39% May 404,908 80,982 June 485,890 80,982 July 566,871 80,982 August 647,853 80,982 September 728,835 80,982 October 809,816 80,982 November 890,798 80,982 December 971,780 80,982 Police City Attorney 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 oe 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-- Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 1,045,238 $ 1,045,238 $ 973,358 -6.88% February 2,105,968 1,060,730 1,945,020 -7.64% March 3,177,596 1,071,629 3,008,075 -5.33% April 4,236,492 1,058,896 4,001,453 -5.55% May 5,296,298 1,059,805 June 6,428,932 1,132,634 July 7,551,012 1,122,080 August 8,579,704 1,028,692 September 9,657,485 1,077,782 October 10,845,669 1,188,184 November 12,168,634 1,322,964 December 13,375,470 1,206,836 Police 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"- Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 15 Packet Pg. 44 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services 2022 Development Services Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 272,173 $ 272,173 $ 309,139 13.58% February 567,186 295,012 661,303 16.59% March 860,247 293,062 909,669 5.75% April 1,174,618 314,370 1,157,411 -1.46% May 1,488,050 313,432 June 1,792,716 304,666 July 2,114,310 321,593 August 2,423,605 309,295 September 2,733,462 309,857 October 3,039,102 305,640 November 3,402,002 362,901 December 3,791,859 389,857 Parks & Recreation Development Services 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,00001 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Year Budget -d Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2022 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 358,065 $ 358,065 $ 319,222 -10.85% February 748,023 389,958 651,988 -12.84% March 1,136,243 388,220 1,040,803 -8.40% April 1,535,144 398,902 1,354,932 -11.74% May 1,941,016 405,872 June 2,369,808 428,792 July 2,835,053 465,245 August 3,347,305 512,252 September 3,871,489 524,184 October 4,291,784 420,295 November 4,690,353 398,569 December 5,125,535 435,182 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 16 Packet Pg. 45 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration 2022 Public Works Administration Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 49,466 $ 49,466 $ 22,716 -54.08% February 100,066 50,600 46,637 -53.39% March 150,167 50,100 71,242 -52.56% April 201,867 51,701 94,556 -53.16% May 252,421 50,554 June 303,852 51,431 July 355,684 51,832 August 405,471 49,786 September 455,172 49,701 October 504,185 49,013 November 567,424 63,239 December 614,113 46,689 Facilities Maintenance Public Works Administration 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget � Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 219,301 $ 219,301 $ 109,202 -50.20% February 456,337 237,035 369,398 -19.05% March 723,326 266,990 562,089 -22.29% April 964,010 240,684 782,173 -18.86% May 1,206,775 242,765 June 1,404,870 198,095 July 1,647,775 242,905 August 1,934,891 287,116 September 2,271,751 336,861 October 2,655,928 384,177 November 2,962,277 306,349 December 3,425,275 462,998 Facilities Maintenance 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 17 Packet Pg. 46 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2022 Engineering Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 225,595 $ 225,595 $ 226,829 0.55% February 452,988 227,392 457,182 0.93% March 684,071 231,083 685,977 0.28% April 917,956 233,885 914,235 -0.41% May 1,175,026 257,070 June 1,412,521 237,495 July 1,660,688 248,167 August 1,900,016 239,329 September 2,131,816 231,799 October 2,366,570 234,755 November 2,602,612 236,042 December 2,845,336 242,724 Engine a ring 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC � Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 18 Packet Pg. 47 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVINUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 44,640,708 $ 11,029,475 $ 10,451,247 $ 34,189,461 230 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 225,000 - - 225,000 00 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 119,645 - 10,892 108,753 90 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND - 100 - - 04 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 200,000 - - 200,000 00 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 167,210 1,192 675 166,535 00 Ill STREET FUND 1,751,930 453,730 431,336 1,320,594 250 G 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 1 13,684,871 677,709 1,097,315 12,587,556 84 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 216,701 13,334 83,247 133,454 380 ca 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - 324 - - 00 C 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 84,410 15,236 26,448 57,962 310 = 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,540 9,710 11,056 15,484 420 LL ZI 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,550 222 128 1,422 84 t 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 29,590 6,034 9,457 20,133 r� 320 Co 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2 2,271,020 784,296 619,544 1,651,476 270 2 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2 2,261,030 778,370 613,917 1,647,113 N 274 C N 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 82,750 38,166 74,404 8,346 900 - 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 182,430 77,558 65,814 116,616 'L 360 Q 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 4,330 2,671 1,511 2,819 350 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 43,520 25,777 16,991 26,529 390 C Q. 138 SIST ER CITY COMMISSION 10,290 166 139 10,151 14 � 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 79,349 49,995 50,408 28,941 64° ca 141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 65,000 26,290 24,287 40,713 370 r- 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 4,856,549 - - 4,856,549 00 E 143 TREE FUND 215,330 - 183 215,147 00 >% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 611,370 - - 611,370 00 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 2 3,822,685 289,144 808,210 3,014,475 210 0 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 2,400 59,500 (59,500) 04 N 421 WATER UTILITYFUND3 11,018,136 3,096,082 3,185,630 7,832,506 290 N 422 STORM UTILITYFUND3 7,877,897 2,705,036 2,401,152 5,476,745 300 .Q 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 24,820,083 6,735,220 6,756,335 18,063,748 274 Q 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,700 4 514 1,988,186 r-� 04 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,925,920 542,019 612,108 1,313,812 324 t 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,153,570 411,202 387,698 765,872 340 R $ 124,4389114 $ 27,771,460 $ 27,800,146 $ 96,637,968 r 22 Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Traffic Impact fee in March 2022. Z REET revenues are down a total of $(312,143) from this point in time last year. 3 Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Park Impact fee in March 2022. a 2022 Utility Rate Increases are 4.5%for Water, 5%for Sewer, and 9.5%for Storm Drain. 19 Packet Pg. 48 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 1 C ITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERAL FUND $ 52,360,872 $ 14,232,961 $ 15,469,533 $ 36,891,339 300 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 260,490 124,508 114,099 146,391 440 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,900 - - 5,900 00, 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 545,000 17,074 527,926 30, 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 200,000 - 200,000 00 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 45,800 - - 45,800 00 III STREET FUND 2,315,780 754,458 781,473 1,534,307 340, O 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 12,868,796 273,782 494,505 12,374,291 40,, d 117 MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND 195,380 12,451 13,945 181,435 70 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 100,900 13,510 12,011 88,889 120/ T c� C 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 - - 26,880 04 C 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 - 3,000 00, IL 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 28,200 - - 28,200 ZI 00 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 4,589,688 54,964 553,438 4,036,250 r� 120/ C 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2,483,667 238,618 134,032 2,349,635 50, 2 N 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 78,400 10,981 2,462 75,938 30, C 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 220,561 58,898 60,462 160,099 N 270 - 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 50,000 - - 50,000 L 0° C 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 25,000 - 25,000 00, 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 11,900 - - 11,900 00, Q 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 87,680 18,593 16,298 71,382 190, 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 6,077,492 - 295,776 5,781,716 501 <0 143 TREE FUND 214,800 - 214,800 00, r- 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 611,370 - - 611,370 00, LL 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 7,614,418 140,478 2,037,225 5,577,193 270 >% z 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 11,490,988 1,715,970 1,897,778 9,593,210 170/ 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 9,619,649 1,330,584 1,402,081 8,217,568 15° n 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,529,856 6,297,879 5,255,655 24,274,201 180, N 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 - - 1,988,710 O 00, N 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,950,371 338,356 456,143 1,494,228 230/ .a 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,539,022 404,389 545,022 994,000 350 Q r-� 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND - 32,192 - - 00, N $ 147,140,570 $ 26,053,570 $ 29,559,012 $117,5819558 200, t 20 Packet Pg. 49 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 3 Title TAXES: 1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 2 EMS PROPERTY TAX 3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX 4 LOCAL RETAIL SALESIUSE TAX 5 5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 8 GAS UTILITY TAX 9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 10 WATERUTILITY TAX 11 SEWER UTILITY TAX 12 ST ORMWAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX 13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 15 PULLTABSTAX 16 AMUSEMENT GAMES 17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LICENSES AND PERMITS: 18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE 19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST 22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT 23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER 24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 28 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 29 ANIMAL LICENSES 30 STREET AND CURB PERMIT 31 OT R NON -BUS LIC/PERMIT S INTERGOVERNMENTAL: 32 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 33 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 34 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2 35 WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT 36 DOC FAC ROOFING 37 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY 38 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 39 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT 40 CJ - POPULATION 41 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS 42 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION 43 DUI - CITIES 44 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 45 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 46 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND 47 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ. 48 VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 Budget Revenues 4/30/2022 Amount Revenues Remaining %Received $ 11,127,000 $ 900,782 $ 965,094 $ 10,161,906 90/ 4,278,000 354,714 384,002 3,893,998 90/ 500 1 27 473 501 10,000,000 3,041,781 3,469,412 6,530,588 350/ 7,600 3,413 6,401 1,199 840/ 870,000 288,337 325,350 544,650 370/ 1,410,000 721,208 726,969 683,031 520r 595,000 350,366 397,808 197,192 670/ 284,000 118,740 113,712 170,288 400r 953,000 273,016 268,813 684,187 280/ 894,600 297,593 233,564 661,036 260/ 471,900 192,636 211,419 260,481 4501 792,000 263,405 273,041 518,959 340/ 523,000 190,824 175,045 347,955 330r 55,200 32,563 29,294 25,906 530/ 350 143 - 350 00/ 306,000 77,762 77,160 228,840 250/ 32,568,150 7,107,282 7,657,111 24,911,039 240, 250 300 50 200 200/ 700 - 20 680 30/ 40,000 9,914 22,202 17,798 560/ 702,700 338,231 349,602 353,098 5001 41,000 9,639 12,098 28,902 300/ 100,600 18,760 12,550 88,050 120/ 384,000 82,609 84,298 299,702 220/ 250,000 82,108 83,329 166,671 330/ 63,000 29,265 32,055 30,945 5101 30,000 14,440 30,173 (173) 1010/ 650,600 205,312 273,423 377,177 420/ 24,000 6,349 7,419 16,581 310r 55,000 26,355 24,602 30,398 450/ 20,000 5,102 4,928 15,072 250r 2,361,850 828,383 936,750 1,425,100 40°r 9,000 2,671 5,237 3,763 580/ 11,100 908 718 10,382 60/ - 3,947 - - 00/ 3,390 - - 00/ - 379,270 - - 00/ 273,000 - - 273,000 00/ 210,500 - - 210,500 00/ 16,740 8,070 10,776 5,964 640i 13,070 6,757 7,142 5,928 5501 45,600 24,120 25,386 20,214 560r 60,000 17,895 24,665 35,335 410/ 4,500 3,335 3,587 914 800r 261,500 146,188 152,556 108,944 580/ 343,200 83,909 83,190 260,010 240/ 1,000 - - 1,000 00/ 550 - - 550 00/ - 66,000 - - 00/ 1,249,760 746,459 313,257 936,503 250, 5 2022 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $427,631 higher than 2021 revenues. Please also see pagespages 5 & 6. 21 1 Packet Pg. 50 1 I 7.2.a I Page 2 of 3 C TTY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 Title Budget Revenues 4/30/2022 Amount Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: 1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS $ 3,000 $ 2,198 $ 2,212 $ 789 2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES 600 30 44 557 3 CREDIT CARD FEES 11,000 2,036 441 10,559 4 COURT RECORD SERVICES 150 - 1 149 5 D/M COURT REC SER 300 - - 300 6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE - 168 - - 7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE 4,000 98 - 4,000 8 IT TIME PAY FEE 1,000 246 49 951 9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURREXPEN 50 67 51 (1) 10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS 100 - - 100 11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKINGPERMITS 25,000 - - 25,000 12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 600 - - 600 13 PHOTOCOPIES 1,000 83 51 949 14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 5,000 - - 5,000 15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 180,000 92,380 89,145 90,855 16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES 1,400 - 2,885 (1,485) 17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES(SNO-ISLE) 85,000 34,342 45,868 39,132 18 PASSPORTSANDNATURALIZATION FEES 10,000 - 1,820 8,180 19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 30,000 - - 30,000 20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 14,000 - - 14,000 21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 210,970 102,412 52,742 158,228 22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES - - 25 (25) 23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 57,000 33,108 35,250 21,750 24 LEGAL SERVICES 1,050 44 302 748 25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 38,000 11,360 6,745 31,255 26 BOOKING FEES 3,000 313 182 2,818 27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 10,000 7,424 9,193 807 28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 3,500 1,023 211 3,289 29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 1,007,500 201,222 238,403 769,097 30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 2,500 520 1,454 1,046 31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 100 - - 100 32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 65,600 28,433 36,168 29,433 33 PLAN CHECKING FEES 425,000 204,113 88,730 336,270 34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 4,000 5,865 4,881 (881) 35 PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 500 - 110 390 36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW 3,000 1,480 2,960 40 37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY 14,000 4,455 5,975 8,025 38 GYM AND WEIGHT ROOM FEES 13,000 - 599 12,401 39 PROGRAM FEES 1,011,580 148,703 284,310 727,270 40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 1,300 - - 1,300 41 HOLIDAY MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 5,000 185 - 5,000 42 WINTERMARKET FEES - - 7,270 (7,270) 43 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 1,000 - - 1,000 44 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS 4,011,558 1,121,306 392,832 3,618,726 7,261,358 2,003,614 1,310,907 5,950,451 74°r 7 °i 4°/ 1 °/ 0°/ 0°r 0°/ 501 101°/ 0°i 0°r 0°/ Q. 501 N 0°/ 50°1 .0 206°/ 54°/ _ 18° iL 0°/ >, 0°/ t r� 25°/ 0°/ 0 62°/ N 29°r C 18°i N 6°i =i 92°r Q 6°/ Q 24°r r 58°/ OQ 0°/ d 55°r W 21 ° rp 122°i t� 22°/ 99°i 43°/ LL 5° >' 28°/ 0°/ O 0 2 0°/ N cm 0°r O 10°i N 180, .Q a a 22 Packet Pg. 51 7.2.a Page 3 of 3 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received FINES AND PENALTIES: 1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 6 OTHER INFRACTIONS'04 7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 8 PARK/INDDISZONE 9 DWI PENALTIES 10 DUI - DP ACCT 11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI 12 DUI - DP FEE 13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 15 CRIM CONV FEE CT 16 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 20 CRIM CONV FEE CN 21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT 24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES MISCELLANEOUS: 26 INVESTMENT INTEREST 27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 29 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS 30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 31 LEASESLONG-TERM 32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION 33 PARKS DONATIONS 34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 39 OTHERJUDGEMENT/S'ETTLEMENT 40 POLICE JUDGMENT SREST IT UT ION 41 CASHIERS OVERAGES/SHORTAGES 42 OTHER MISC REVENUES 43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT 44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 45 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 46 NSF FEES -POLICE 47 NSF FEES - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 48 US BANK REBATE TRANSFERS -IN: 49 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 TO TAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 2,000 $ 1,083 $ 567 $ 1,433 280/ 230,000 73,311 20,907 209,093 90/ 18,000 3,605 1,788 16,212 100/ 10,000 5,718 1,308 8,692 130/ 1,000 203 - 1,000 00/ 1,500 840 254 1,246 170/ 100,000 20,937 5,190 94,810 501 2,000 250 100 1,900 501 7,000 2,981 1,079 5,921 1501 300 16 26 274 90/ 100 59 9 91 90/ 1,500 676 579 921 390/ 25,000 4,445 3,577 21,423 140/ 2,000 563 573 1,427 290/ 700 19 37 663 50/ 100 12 - 100 00/ 10,000 431 1,089 8,911 110/ 800 15 12 788 20/ 1,000 41 142 858 140/ 200 36 - 200 00/ 8,000 1,327 1,404 6,596 180/ 14,000 3,218 1,043 12,957 70/ 3,000 797 74 2,926 20/ 10,100 - 50 10,050 00/ 150 - - 150 00/ 448,450 1209582 39,808 408,642 270,390 132,525 88,188 182,202 330/ 13,340 2,824 1,645 11,695 120/ 10,180 2,696 2,121 8,059 210/ 153,000 7,811 23,556 129,444 1501 2,100 - - 2,100 00/ 205,000 64,449 68,746 136,254 340/ 2,500 - 239 2,261 100/ 3,500 - 2,300 1,200 660/ 1,500 350 370 1,130 250/ 5,000 - 249 4,751 501 300 - 84 216 280/ 3,800 3,185 996 2,804 260/ 2,000 - - 2,000 00/ 2,000 102 - 2,000 00/ 200 30 30 170 1501 - 2 100 (100) 00/ 41,180 4,122 808 40,372 20/ 100 34 26 74 260/ 100 30 - 100 00/ 150 - - 150 00/ - 30 - - 00/ - - 60 (60) 00/ 8,500 4,966 3,896 4,604 460/ 724,840 223,155 193,414 531,426 270, 26,300 - - 26,300 00/ 26,300 - - 26,300 00, $ 44,640,708 $11,029,475 $10,451,247 $ 34,189,461 230, w Q 23 Packet Pg. 52 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 19,196,413 $ 5,620,596 $ 5,753,269 $ 13,443,144 300 2 OVERTIME 594,080 185,729 381,107 212,973 640 3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK 294,001 1,951 8,212 285,789 M 4 BENEFITS 6,820,049 2,125,750 2,148,219 4,671,830 314 5 UNIFORMS 119,151 26,774 23,139 96,012 190 6 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 70,944 - 23,649 47,295 330 7 SUPPLIES 481,165 143,762 106,353 374,812 224 8 FUEL CONSUMED - 17 - - V 9 SMALL EQUIPMENT 204,019 67,834 36,646 167,373 180 10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,411,043 4,461,965 5,041,380 12,369,663 29° 11 COMMUNICATIONS 171,235 52,306 41,760 129,475 244 12 TRAVEL 81,155 1,779 9,382 71,773 120 13 EXCISE TAXES 16,500 7,672 10,566 5,934 640 14 RENTAL/LEASE 2,091,693 509,599 676,603 1,415,091 324 15 INSURANCE 503,161 405,121 503,160 1 10V 16 UTILITIES 529,462 169,063 195,426 334,036 370 17 REPAIRS& MAINT ENANCE 1,090,350 225,110 213,762 876,588 200 18 MISCELLANEOUS 652,023 177,934 201,492 450,531 314 19 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 1000 20 BUILDINGS - - 45,195 (45,195) V 21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,385,000 - - 1,385,000 04 22 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - - 0° 23 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 270,180 - - 270,180 M 24 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 55,170 - - 55,170 09 25 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 4,790 - - 4,790 0° 26 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 268,788 - - 268,788 M 27 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 - 212 288 420 52,360,872 14,232,961 15,469,533 36,891,339 300 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009) 28 BENEFITS $ - $ 79,133 $ 76,230 $ (76,230) 00 29 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 252,990 45,375 30,384 222,606 120 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 - 7,000 - 10V 31 MISCELLANEOUS 500 - 485 15 970 260,490 124,508 114,099 146,391 44U HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFTFUND (014) 32 SUPPLIES $ 100 $ $ - $ 100 V 33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 - 200 04 34 MISCELLANEOUS 5,600 - 5,600 V 5,900 - 5,900 04 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016) 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 195,000 $ - $ 450 $ 194,550 04 36 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 150,000 - 16,072 133,928 110 37 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 90,000 - 552 89,448 14 38 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 110,000 - - 110,000 V 545,000 - 17,074 527,926 34 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RFSPONSEFUND (018) 39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 V 200,000 - - 200,000 V DRUG ENID RC EMENT FUND (104) 40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 04 41 REPAIR/MAINT 800 - - 800 V 45,800 - - 45,800 V O Q. N 2 C ev C LL t C O 2 N N O N �L CL a O O. d <0 C O C iL z r C O 2 N N O N �L Q. a C N 1= t c� r a 24 Packet Pg. 53 I 7.2.a I Page 2 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining yo Spent STREETFUND (111) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 749,110 $ 247,515 $ 234,647 $ 514,463 319 2 OVERTIME 38,400 15,593 10,544 27,856 279 3 BENEFITS 347,919 121,604 114,387 233,532 339 4 UNIFORMS 6,000 5,432 3,912 2,088 659 5 SUPPLIES 263,000 29,162 42,781 220,219 169 6 SMALL EQUIPMENT 20,000 770 587 19,413 39 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,210 4,351 9,878 13,332 439 8 COMMUNICATIONS 4,500 2,280 1,825 2,675 419 9 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 09 10 RENTAL/LEASE 290,150 81,865 96,149 194,001 339 11 INSURANCE 184,111 148,533 184,111 0 10W 12 UTILITIES 273,730 78,010 67,108 206,622 259 13 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 72,000 9,065 4,653 67,347 69 14 MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 10,278 10,891 (2,891) 1369 15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 30,000 - - 30,000 09 16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 4,270 - - 4,270 09 17 INTEREST 380 - - 380 09 $ 2,315,780 $ 754,458 $ 781,473 $ 1,534,307 349 COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE(112) 18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 3,159,560 $ 274,625 $ 187,251 $ 2,972,309 69 19 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 1,508,270 - 122 1,508,148 09 20 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 108,975 - - 108,975 M 21 LAND - (842) 36,264 (36,264) 09 22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 8,018,521 - 270,868 7,747,653 M 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,220 - - 72,220 M 24 INTEREST 1,250 - - 1,250 09 $ 12,868,796 $ 273,782 $ 494,505 $ 12,374,291 49 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) 25 SUPPLIES $ 4,700 $ 217 $ 36 $ 4,664 14 26 SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,700 - - 1,700 W 27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 180,000 11,622 12,883 167,117 79 28 TRAVEL 80 - - 80 09 29 RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 2,000 09 30 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 M 31 MISCELLANEOUS 6,600 612 1,025 5,575 169 $ 195,380 $ 12,451 $ 13,945 $ 181,435 79 HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) 32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,900 $ 13,510 $ 12,011 $ 83,889 1M 33 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 - - 1,000 09 34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 4,000 - - 4,000 W $ 100,900 $ 13,510 $ 12,011 $ 88,889 129 EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) 35 SUPPLIES $ 1,790 $ - $ - $ 1,790 M 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,090 - - 25,090 M $ 26,880 $ - $ - $ 26,880 09 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) 37 MISCELLANEOUS $ 3,000 $ $ - $ 3,000 09 $ 3,000 $ $ $ 3,000 09 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123 ) 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 28,200 $ $ - $ 28,200 M $ 28,200 $ - $ - $ 28,200 09 a 25 Packet Pg. 54 I 7.2.a I Page 3 of 6 CITY OFEDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL ESTATE EXC ISE TAX 2 (125) 1 SUPPLIES $ 21,000 $ 22,938 $ 8,378 $ 12,622 409 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 469,320 26,956 76,748 392,572 169 3 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 668,258 5,070 56,168 612,090 M 4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2,534 - - 2,534 09 5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,428,576 - 412,144 3,016,432 129 $ 4,589,688 $ 54,964 $ 553,438 $ 4,036,250 129 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126) 6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 10 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 11 INTEREST 12 OTHER INTERESI' & DEBT SERVICE COSTS GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) 13 SUPPLIES 14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15 MISCELLANEOUS 16 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES CEMEIERY MAINTENANCEINWRO VEMENT (130) 17 SALARIES AND WAGES 18 OVERTIME 19 BENEFIT S 20 UNIFORMS 21 SUPPLIES 22 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24 COMMUNICATIONS 25 TRAVEL 26 RENTAL/LEASE 27 UTILITIES 28 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 29 MISCELLANEOUS PARKS TRUSTFUND (136) 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137) 31 SMALL EQUIPMENT SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) 32 SUPPLIES 33 TRAVEL 34 MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140) 35 SUPPLIES 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37 MISCELLANEOUS EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142) 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE FUND (143) 39 SUPPLIES 40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 41 LAND 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) 42 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 43 INTEREST $ 673,827 $ 101,624 $ 22,913 $ 650,914 M 878,353 14,138 13,266 865,087 29 144,970 - - 144,970 09 526,057 122,857 97,473 428,584 199 149,820 - - 149,820 09 110,640 - - 110,640 09 - - 380 (380) M $ 2,483,667 $ 238,618 $ 134,032 $ 2,349,635 59 $ 45,000 $ 10,981 $ 2,462 $ 42,538 59 6,500 - - 6,500 09 600 - - 600 09 26,300 - - 26,300 M $ 78,400 $ 10,981 $ 2,462 $ 75,938 M $ 119,837 $ 27,896 $ 29,146 $ 90,691 249 3,500 150 239 3,261 79 41,069 12,623 12,533 28,536 319 1,000 - - 1,000 09 7,000 107 45 6,955 19 20,000 7,497 8,241 11,759 419 4,200 800 800 3,400 199 1,700 561 572 1,128 349 500 - - 500 09 11,690 5,550 3,897 7,793 339 5,565 1,147 1,121 4,444 209 500 - - 500 09 4,000 2,567 3,868 132 979 $ 220,561 $ 58,898 $ 60,462 $ 160,099 279 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 09 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 09 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 09 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 09 $ 1,500 $ - $ - $ 1,500 M 4,500 - - 4,500 M 5,900 - - 5,900 09 $ 11,900 $ - $ - $ 11,900 09 $ 4,050 $ 273 $ 466 $ 3,584 119 77,535 17,651 15,643 61,892 200 6,095 669 189 5,906 39 87,680 18,593 16,298 71,382 199 $ 6,077,492 $ - $ 295,776 $ 5,781,716 59 6,077,492 - $ 295,776 $ 5,781,716 59 $ 1,000 $ $ $ 1,000 M 14,800 - 14,800 09 199,000 - 199,000 M 214,800 - 214,800 09 $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ 550,000 09 61,370 - - 61,370 M $ 611,370 $ - $ - $ 611,370 09 O Q. d Ta C eo C .E- LL L C O 2 N N O N �L O. Q O Q d <0 C R C iL z C O E N N O N a r-� C N 1= t t� R r Q 26 Packet Pg. 55 I 7.2.a I Page 4 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332) 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,832 $ 67,357 $ 127,454 $ (31,622) 13M 2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 63,000 - 62,656 344 999 3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 7,357,188 73,121 1,847,115 5,510,073 250 4 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 98,398 - - 98,398 M $ 7,614,418 $ 140,478 $ 2,037,225 $ 5,577,193 279 WATER FUND (421) 5 SALARIES AND WAGES 6 OVERTIME 7 BENEFIT S 8 UNIFORMS 9 SUPPLIES 10 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 11 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 12 SMALL EQUIPMENT 13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14 COMMUNICATIONS 15 TRAVEL 16 EXCISE TAXES 17 RENTAL/LEASE 18INSURANCE 19 UTILITIES 20 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 21 MISCELLANEOUS 22 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 23 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 24 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 25 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 26 REVENUE BONDS 27 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 28 INTEREST 29 OTHER INT EREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS STORM FUND (422) 30 SALARIES AND WAGES 31 OVERTIME 32 BENEFIT S 33 UNIFORMS 34 SUPPLIES 35 SMALL EQUIPMENT 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37 COMMUNICATIONS 38 TRAVEL 39 EXCISE TAXES 40 RENTAL/LEASE 41 INSURANCE 42 UTILITES 43 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 44 MISCELLANEOUS 45 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 46 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 47 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 48 REVENUE BONDS 49 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 50 INTEREST 51 OTHER INT EREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS $ 842,096 $ 223,949 $ 255,783 $ 586,313 3M 24,000 6,079 4,561 19,439 199 330,100 95,239 106,858 223,242 329 4,000 2,179 1,913 2,087 489 150,000 25,738 50,199 99,801 339 2,170,000 260,968 398,457 1,771,543 189 170,000 77,184 71,614 98,386 429 11,000 3,917 2,527 8,473 230 2,237,439 358,686 223,634 2,013,805 109 30,000 9,262 9,089 20,911 3M 200 - - 200 09 1,649,700 424,636 415,560 1,234,140 259 152,590 41,065 50,376 102,214 339 122,359 98,196 122,359 (0) 10M 35,000 11,201 12,162 22,838 359 176,130 11,030 11,609 164,521 79 123,600 66,640 73,488 50,112 590 645,370 - - 645,370 09 10,000 - - 10,000 09 1,998,334 - 87,212 1,911,122 49 2,870 - - 2,870 09 399,780 - - 399,780 09 25,840 - - 25,840 09 180,580 - - 180,580 09 - - 378 (378) M $ 11,490,988 $ 1,715,970 $ 1,897,778 $ 9,593,210 179 $ 734,284 $ 237,035 $ 260,998 $ 473,286 369 26,000 12,794 8,503 17,497 339 294,767 103,989 107,248 187,519 369 6,500 4,555 5,543 957 859 46,000 16,177 25,208 20,792 550 4,000 304 587 3,413 159 3,481,263 449,989 285,011 3,196,252 89 3,200 2,017 1,555 1,645 499 4,300 150 - 4,300 09 470,100 223,956 245,680 224,420 529 267,150 88,199 88,054 179,096 339 82,335 66,228 82,335 (0) 1009 10,500 5,134 5,701 4,799 549 67,130 19,187 11,040 56,090 169 232,300 100,872 80,388 151,912 359 297,787 - - 297,787 09 3,137,333 - 194,065 2,943,268 69 104,540 - - 104,540 09 195,390 - - 195,390 09 53,590 - - 53,590 09 101,180 - - 101,180 09 - - 165 (165) 09 $ 9,619,649 $ 1,330,584 $ 1,402,081 $ 8,217,568 150 O a d Ta C eo C .E- LL 21 t C O 2 N N O N �L a a O a C O C iL 21 s C O 2 N N O N �L a a C N t t� R r a 27 Packet Pg. 56 I 7.2.a I Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDPTURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent SEWER FUND (423) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,090,461 $ 594,159 $ 608,327 $ 1,482,134 299 2 OVERTIME 95,000 41,609 52,157 42,843 559 3 BENEFITS 847,408 258,494 240,616 606,792 289 4 UNIFORMS 9,500 7,291 5,839 3,661 619 5 SUPPLIES 421,000 134,972 92,496 328,504 229 6 FUEL CONSUMED 60,000 30,050 - 60,000 09 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE 4,000 - - 4,000 09 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 35,000 70,326 91,475 (56,475) 2619 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,315,884 1,322,635 770,350 1,545,534 339 10 COMMUNICATIONS 43,000 13,568 14,069 28,931 339 11 TRAVEL 5,000 1,580 - 5,000 09 12 EXCISE TAXES 978,000 366,321 311,979 666,021 329 13 RENTALILEASE 317,410 135,541 108,391 209,019 349 14INSURANCE 202,407 162,851 203,936 (1,529) 1019 15 UTILITIES 1,532,060 499,573 775,108 756,952 519 16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 790,630 55,269 332,387 458,243 429 17 MISCELLANEOUS 126,350 52,198 62,611 63,739 509 18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 6,388,519 - - 6,388,519 09 19 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 12,520,297 2,529,639 1,564,772 10,955,525 129 20 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 126,500 - - 126,500 09 21 REVENUE BONDS 89,840 - - 89,840 09 22 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 174,610 15,047 15,397 159,213 99 23 INTEREST 356,980 2,986 2,786 354,194 19 24 DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 1,518 - - 09 25 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 2,252 2,959 (2,959) 09 $ 29,529,856 $ 6,297,879 $ 5,255,655 $ 24,274,201 189 BOND RESERVEFUND (424) 26 REVENUE BONDS $ 810,010 $ $ $ 810,010 09 27 INTEREST 1,178,700 1,178,700 09 $ 1,988,710 $ $ $ 1,988,710 09 O t?. d C eo C LL 21 L r., C O 2 N N O N �L O. a O O. d w C M C iL z r C O a N N O N �L a E M a 2s Packet Pg. 57 I 7.2.a I Page 6 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 275,712 $ 91,289 $ 100,011 $ 175,701 369 2 OVERTIME 2,000 1,573 222 1,778 119 3 BENEFITS 112,077 38,292 38,654 73,423 349 4 UNIFORMS 1,500 928 742 758 499 5 SUPPLIES 120,000 18,316 50,526 69,474 429 6 FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 09 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 268,000 58,493 160,901 107,099 609 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 5,892 2,072 55,928 49 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46,750 418 486 46,264 19 10 COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 755 685 2,315 239 11 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 09 12 RENTAL/LEASE 11,160 4,133 3,438 7,722 319 13 INSURANCE 49,172 39,334 51,903 (2,731) 1069 14 UTILITIES 14,000 6,869 8,256 5,744 599 15 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 60,000 8,525 11,896 48,104 209 16 MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 1,852 1,711 10,289 149 17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 915,000 61,687 24,640 890,360 39 $ 1,950,371 $ 338,356 $ 456,143 $ 1,494,228 239 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512) 18 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 442,074 $ 105,256 $ 88,632 $ 353,442 209 19 OVERTIME 2,000 909 - 2,000 09 20 BENEFITS 159,538 33,761 35,215 124,323 229 21 SUPPLIES 5,000 1,864 2,340 2,660 479 22 SMALL EQUIPMENT 357,900 8,894 18,458 339,442 59 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61,860 13,894 4,736 57,124 M 24 COMMUNICATIONS 58,770 17,696 16,191 42,579 2M 25 TRAVEL 1,500 - - 1,500 09 26 RENTAL/LEASE 7,460 1,467 1,487 5,973 209 27 REPAIRS & MAINT ENANCE 381,920 219,602 377,903 4,017 999 28 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 1,046 60 4,940 19 29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - - 56,000 09 $ 1,539,022 $ 404,389 $ 545,022 $ 994,000 355 FIREMAN'S PENSION FUND (617) 30 BENEFITS $ - $ 11,684 $ - $ - 09 31 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 20,507 - M $ - $ 32,192 $ - $ - 09 TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS $ 147,140,570 $ 26,053,570 $ 29,559,012 $ 117,581,558 205 O Q. N C O C LL 21 L C O 2 N N O N �L Q. a O Q. d w C O C iL z r C O a N N O N E. a E M a 29 Packet Pg. 58 7.2.a Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F IDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL OFFICE OF MAYOR HUMAN RESOURCES MUNICIPAL COURT CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CITY ATTORNEY NON -DEPARTMENTAL POLICE SERVICES SATELLITE OFFICE COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM PARKS & RECREATION PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Title $ 497,900 $ 110,738 $ 100,819 $ 397,081 20% 443,913 111,352 119,372 324,541 27% 824,831 252,612 270,474 554,357 33% 1,368,755 359,370 386,046 982,709 28% - 272,337 - - 0% 2,156,911 402,835 722,690 1,434,221 34% G Q. 971,780 282,407 287,018 684,762 30% LY 15,574,121 4,484,023 5,036,007 10,538,114 32% Ta Z 13,375,470 3,802,023 4,001,453 9,374,017 30% 166,576 - 32,569 134,007 20% C 'L 719,388 157,909 179,118 540,270 25% t 3,791,859 934,573 1,157,411 2,634,448 31% r� C 2 459,109 19,434 30,660 428,449 7% N N 5,125,535 1,273,239 1,354,932 3,770,603 26% N 3,459,449 1,058,659 1,008,792 2,450,657 29% 'Q 3,425,275 711,450 782,173 2,643,102 23% Q $ 52,360,872 $ 14,232,961 $ 15,469,533 $ 36,891,339 30% O C. O lY CITY OF EDMO NDS C EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY jL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount z Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent C WATER UTILITYFUND $ 11,490,988 $ 1,715,970 $ 1,897,778 $ 9,593,210 17% n STORM UTILITY FUND 9,619,649 1,330,584 1,402,081 8,217,568 15% N N N SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,529,856 6,297,879 5,255,655 24,274,201 18% .Q BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 - - 1,988,710 0% Q +. $ 52,629,203 $ 9,344,433 $ 8,555,514 $ 44,073,689 16% CD t t� R r Q 30 Packet Pg. 59 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 2 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Title 2022 Amended Budget 4/30/2021 Expenditures 4/30/2022 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL SALARIES AND WAGES $ 204,132 $ 66,636 $ 58,538 $ 145,594 29% BENEFITS 121,868 34,891 31,073 90,795 25% SUPPLIES 2,000 1,494 236 1,764 12% SERVICES 169,900 7,716 10,972 158,928 6% $ 497,900 $ 110,738 $ 100,819 $ 397,081 20% O FFIC E O F MAYO R SALARIES AND WAGES $ 232,296 $ 76,498 $ 82,732 $ 149,564 36% BENEFITS 81,787 28,170 28,764 53,023 35% SUPPLIES 1,500 246 1,539 (39) 103% SERVICES 128,330 6,438 6,338 121,992 5% O $ 443,913 $ 111,352 $ 119,372 $ 324,541 27% HUMAN RESOURCES tY SALARIES AND WAGES $ 398,299 $ 132,514 $ 155,103 $ 243,196 39% BENEFITS 142,526 54,568 54,486 88,040 38% .� SUPPLIES 13,600 845 362 13,238 3% SERVICES 270,406 64,685 60,524 209,882 22% C $ 824,831 $ 252,612 $ 270,474 $ 554,357 33% LL MUNICIPAL C O URT t SALARIES AND WAGES $ 910,606 $ 230,032 $ 254,416 $ 656,190 28% C BENEFITS 217,654 75,101 74,845 142,809 34% 0 SUPPLIES 11,600 2,054 4,268 7,332 37% N SERVICES 228,895 52,184 52,517 176,378 23% C $ 1,368,755 $ 359,370 $ 386,046 $ 982,709 28% N CITY CLERK i SALARIES AND WAGES $ - $ 133,261 $ - $ 0% Q' Q BENEFITS - 54,054 - 0% SUPPLIES - 493 - 0% O SERVICES - 84,529 - 0% CL 4) d $ - $ 272,337 $ - $ - 0% w ADMINIS TRATIVE S ERVIC ES ea SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,301,073 $ 247,246 $ 446,175 $ 854,898 34% _ BENEFITS 413,858 81,170 146,447 267,411 35% SUPPLIES 13,000 1,644 4,781 8,219 37% jL SERVICES 428,980 72,774 125,287 303,693 29% >% $ 2,156,911 $ 402,835 $ 722,690 $ 1,434,221 34% r CITY ATPO RNEY O SERVICES $ 971,780 $ 282,407 $ 287,018 $ 684,762 30% Z $ 971,780 $ 282,407 $ 287,018 $ 684,762 30% N NON -DEPARTMENTAL o SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,750 $ - $ - $ 101,750 0% N BENEFITS 145,504 24,849 35,472 110,032 24% Q. SUPPLIES 5,000 71 - 5,000 0% Q SERVICES 13,557,619 4,409,103 4,950,323 8,607,296 37% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,435,000 50,000 50,000 1,385,000 3% N DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL 55,170 - - 55,170 0% DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST 274,078 212 273,866 0% V $ 15,574,121 $ 4,484,023 $ 5,036,007 $ 10,538,114 32% PO LIC E SERVIC ES Q SALARIES AND WAGES $ 8,723,512 $ 2,520,875 $ 2,646,287 $ 6,077,225 30% BENEFITS 2,994,876 892,546 927,186 2,067,690 31% SUPPLIES 281,569 110,746 38,354 243,215 14% SERVICES 1,375,513 277,856 389,626 985,887 28% $ 13,375,470 $ 3,802,023 $ 4,001,453 $ 9,374,017 30% SATELLITE O FFIC E SALARIES AND WAGES $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0% BENEFIT S 5,000 - 5,000 0% SUPPLIES 12,000 11,057 943 92% SERVICES 124,576 21,512 103,064 17% $ 166,576 $ $ 32,569 $ 134,007 20% 31 Packet Pg. 60 1 Page 2 of 2 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2022 Amended 4/30/2021 4/30/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES AND WAGES $ 365,627 $ 95,484 $ 66,566 $ 299,061 18% BENEFITS 111,361 28,322 21,559 89,802 19% SUPPLIES 4,075 111 269 3,806 7% SERVICES 238,325 33,993 90,725 147,600 38% $ 719,388 $ 157,909 $ 179,118 $ 540,270 25% DEVELO PMEVT S ERVIC ES /PLANNING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,978,832 $ 581,467 $ 697,722 $ 1,281,110 35% BENEFITS 681,706 213,071 239,274 442,432 35% SUPPLIES 19,400 1,836 2,391 17,009 12% SERVICES 1,111,921 138,199 218,023 893,898 20% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 0% $ 3,791,859 $ 934,573 $ 1,157,411 $ 2,634,448 31% HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,496 $ 15,657 $ 18,045 $ 83,451 18% BENEFITS 29,113 3,575 3,608 25,505 12% SUPPLIES 15,000 - 412 14,588 3% SERVICES 313,500 201 8,596 304,904 3% 459,109 19,434 30,660 428,449 7% PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,627,863 $ 749,976 $ 768,051 $ 1,859,812 29% BENEFITS 865,945 274,592 267,512 598,433 31% SUPPLIES 166,640 41,362 47,487 119,153 28% SERVICES 1,465,087 207,309 271,881 1,193,206 19% $ 5,125,535 $ 1,273,239 $ 1,354,932 $ 3,770,603 26% PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION SALARIES AND WAGES $ 387,424 $ 99,794 $ 44,179 $ 343,245 11% BENEFITS 126,689 35,198 21,265 105,424 17% SUPPLIES 9,600 6,356 1,543 8,057 16% SERVICES 90,400 29,311 27,569 62,831 30% $ 614,113 $ 170,658 $ 94,556 $ 519,557 15% FACILITIFS MAINTENANCE SALARIES AND WAGES 860,456 272,806 289,213 571,243 34% BENEFITS 369,679 116,354 114,007 255,672 31% SUPPLIES 128,000 43,561 30,301 97,699 24% SERVICES 1,796,960 278,730 303,457 1,493,503 17% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 270,180 - 45,195 224,986 17% $ 3,425,275 $ 711,450 $ 782,173 $ 2,643,102 23% ENGINEERING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,866,128 $ 586,029 $ 615,563 $ 1,250,565 33% BENEFITS 702,578 236,062 229,510 473,068 33% SUPPLIES 2,200 795 - 2,200 0% SERVICES 274,430 65,114 69,162 205,268 25% $ 2,845,336 $ 888,001 $ 914,235 $ 1,931,101 32% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 52,360,872 $ 14,232,961 $ 15,469,533 $ 36,891,339 30% a 32 Packet Pg. 61 7.2.a GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- & SUBFUNDS 4/30/2022 4/30/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 001-General Fund ' $ 10,913,064 $ 3,435,725 $ (4,571,033) $ (5,018,286 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 141,119 141,119 (88,086) (114,099 011-Risk Management Reserve Fund 25,000 25,000 - - 0 012-Contingency Reserve Fund 1,782,150 1,782,150 - - 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 16,422 16,421 - - 016-Building Maintenance 4,393,818 4,393,818 (1,263) (6,182 017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation 848,617 848,616 - - ii Total General Fund & Subfunds $ 18,120,189 $ 10,642,849 $ (4,660,382) $ (5,138,567 >, t r c 0 *$8,067,160 of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,78150 balance in Fund 012, represent the 2, required N 20% operating reserve. N There are no interfund loans outstanding at this time. a Q 1` 0 Q. m GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW LL 21 0 BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 2 N ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- o N GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 4/30/2022 4/30/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance Q General Fund & Subfunds $ 18,120,189 $ 10,642,849 $ (4,660,382) $ (5,138,567 E Special Revenue 19,141,181 17,933,062 669,865 762,459 Capital Projects 2,884,848 3,135,015 (822,073) (1,229,015 c� Q Total Governmental Funds $ 40,146,218 $ 31,710,926 $ (4,812,590) $ (5,605,123 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 33 Packet Pg. 62 7.2.a SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- SPECIAL REVENUE 4/30/2022 4/30/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund $ 75,850 $ 76,350 $ 578 $ 675 111 - Street Fund 601,029 463,485 (290,638) (350,136 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 2,841,257 2,027,285 671,892 602,810 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 718,181 721,643 64,290 69,302 Q 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 85,552 72,314 11,410 14,437 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 87,580 87,974 8,246 11,056 �a 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 14,388 14,460 110 128 123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 105,429 101,363 7,199 9,457 125 - Real Estate Tax2 4,119,520 4,044,636 4,384 66,105 u_ 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 * 3,793,224 3,622,138 290,145 479,885 21 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 373,467 375,049 63,468 71,942 0 130- Cemetery Mai ntenance/Improve ment 271,558 272,966 6,013 5,352 M 136 - Parks Trust Fund 170,101 170,968 1,294 1,511 N 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 1,124,066 1,129,763 14,031 16,991 N 138- Sister City Comm ission 15,619 15,699 119 139 140 -Business Improvement Disrict 63,242 63,242 26,311 34,110 Q 141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing I'd 183,701 176,308 23,034 24,287 142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 4,476,604 4,476,604 (232,175) V_ (295,776 143 -Tree Fund 20,816 20,816 157 183 m Total Special Revenue $ 19,141,181 $ 17,933,062 $ 669,865 $ 762,459 *$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $500,000 for 'u the purchase of Open Space. ii ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW O 2 N N O N BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES L a ENTERPRISE ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- Q :.o FUNDS 4/30/2022 4/30/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance a� E t v 421 -Water Utility Fund $ 30,015,020 $ 7,856,422 $ 1,131,430 $ 1,287,852 Q 422 -Storm Utility Fund " 16,646,449 6,572,801 841,415 999,071 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 61,853,209 16,598,607 1,424,379 1,500,680 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 844,474 844,474 3 514 411 -Combined Utility Operation 59,500 106,309 46,790 59,500 Total Enterprise Funds 1 $ 109,418,652 $ 31,978,613 1 $ 3,444,017 $ 3,847,617 *$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding. *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 34 Packet Pg. 63 7.2.a SUMMARY OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- CITY-WIDE 4/30/2022 4/30/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance Governmental Funds $ 40,146,218 $ 31,710,926 $ (4,812,590) $ (5,605,123 Enterprise Funds 109,418,652 31,978,613 3,444,017 3,847,617 Internal Services Fund 10,286,191 5,869,220 (93,646) (1,360 0 n Total City-wide Total $ 159,851,062 $ 69,558,759 $ (1,462,219) $ (1,758,866 c c ii 21 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW t 0 0 2 N N O N Q Q BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES o INTERNAL SERVICE ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- 0. FUNDS 4/30/2022 4/30/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance c 511 - Equipment Rental Fund $ 9,364,475 $ 5,120,226 $ 117,520 $ 155,964 u_ 21 512 -Technology Rental Fund 921,716 748,993 (211,166) (157,325 0 Total Internal Service Funds $ 10,286,191 $ 5,869,220 $ (93,646) $ (1,360 2 N N O N 'L Q Q E Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 35 Packet Pg. 64 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Council Appointment to a Board/Commission Staff Lead: Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Volunteer boards and commissions serve our community by providing advice and recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding programs, activities, and issues unique to their mission and purpose. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Councilmember Kristiana Johnson appoints David Kaufer to the Economic Development Commission. Packet Pg. 65 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Written Public Comments Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of written public comments. Narrative Public comments submitted to the web form for public comments <https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment> between June 1, 2022 and June 15, 2022. Attachments: Online Public Comment 20220621 Packet Pg. 66 7.4.a Submitted on: 6/7/2022 4:30:08 PM Name: Barbara Steller City of Residence: EDMONDS Agenda Topic: Environmental Vision for the Future of Edmonds - 4 key areas Comments: I am grateful for the HARD work and sincere attempts by city employees and officials to include and consider nearly every imaginable factor impacting the healthy future environmental vision for the City of Edmonds. It is not easy to see the forest for the trees because each a€cetreeA€m is critical. AND YET there is the overriding challenge of Climate Change. All references to climate change mitigation/adaptation efforts in the various City of Edmonds documents must be embraced as URGENT Some proposed climate change measures are mentioned with the wording when or as A€cefeasibleA€0. It seems dollar signs rather than quotation marks might be inserted around $feasible$. Costs are presumed to be high whether mitigation steps are or are not taken. May they be taken because we cannot afford otherwise! I naively, but with great sincerity, offer some one sentence encouragements for following agenda items. TREE CODE: Education of Edmonds citizens is paramount and perhaps the newly proposed neighborhood street strategy events might include tree give-aways and lessons on the importance of the tremendous beneficial resources of trees. PROS PLAN: Goal #6 addresses climate impacts around park sustainability/management and needs to be robust in scope, emphasizing community volunteer person power as the ultimate and most A€cefeasibleA€0 green solution. EDMONDS WATERFRONT: Acquire the Unocal property for certain for the sake of preserving the Marsh and Willow Creek, and because a four -foot sea level rise is anticipated, take a lesson from the Dutch and/or the New Orleans remediation efforts to keep the water at bay with proposed berms OR put everything up on stilts. PERRINVILLE CREEK: The proposed improvements to the culverts are long overdue and need to happen around the issues of erosion and to enhance the lives of the fish, so crucial to our environment. Respectfully, Barbara Steller Submitted on: 6/7/2022 5:58:21 PM Name: Ken Reidy City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Administrative Order Comments: Edmonds City Code establishes the Mayor's Duties. The mayor shall be the chief executive and administrative officer of the city, in charge of all departments and employees, with authority to designate assistants and department heads. The mayor shall see that all laws and ordinances are faithfully enforced and that law and order is maintained in the city, and shall have general supervision of the administration of city government and all city interest. The Mayor has a duty to enforce the City's Personnel Policies. According to the City's website, the City's Personnel Policies were last changed after a City Council vote on March 31, 2022. The Personnel Policies include the following: 1. The City's primary goal is to provide quality service to its customers, the citizens of Edmonds. 2. To achieve that c m E E 0 U 0 a c m Packet Pg. 67 7.4.a goal, all employees are expected to treat the public as their most valued customer. 3. All employees are expected to serve the public in a professional manner, which is courteous, efficient and helpful. Is refusing to reply to citizen emails how one treats their most valued customer? Can a Mayor who does not reply to citizen emails require city employees to do so? The Personnel Policies have included the following for years: Harassment, particularly sexual harassment, and discrimination can be difficult to define. For this reason, the City strongly urges employees to use this harassment and discrimination reporting procedure without worrying about whether the conduct involved would be considered harassment or discrimination in a legal sense. This policy is intended to assist the City in addressing not only illegal harassment and discrimination, but also any conduct that is offensive and inappropriate. If, at any time, you believe that you are being subjected to harassment or discrimination, if you become aware of such conduct being directed at someone else, or if you believe another employee has received N more favorable treatment because of discrimination, you must promptly notify Human Resources or a manager or director with whom you feel comfortable. This applies to harassment or discrimination CD E caused by anyone with whom an employee comes into contact with as part of the employee's job, such as supervisors, co-workers, citizens, vendors or others. Supervisors and managers have an obligation to v c, immediately report to Human Resources and the Mayor any harassment or discrimination that they observe or become aware of during the course of their employment. The obligation to immediately a- c report has existed for years. Why has the entire city council been accused of conduct? Why was there no advance notice and why were no details provided? Submitted on: 6/7/2022 6:39:08 PM Name: Joe Scordino City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Updated Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan Comments: I recommend that the Council TABLE consideration of the PROS Plan until a later date when complete information is made available to the Council (and the citizens of Edmonds). At the April 5, 2022 Council meeting, the Council agreed to a PROS Plan revision process where a table of revisions with all the comments would be presented to the Council and the public. THERE IS NO SUCH TABLE IN THE AGENDA PACKET! Specifically, page 20 of the Minutes of the April 5, 2022 states: "Ms. Feser said she has all the comments from the last meeting and various emails and would work with the consultant and bring those forward in a very transparent manner, such as the revision table that was done for the Planning Board to show the proposed changes." Page 20 of the Minutes of the April 5, 2022 meeting also show that Council members clarified what they expected to see when the revised PROS Plan was brought back to the Council as follows: "Councilmember Tibbott assumed if staff were to bring back the revisions, they would include the gaps that have been identified over the last couple months and the council could then approve or reject the revisions. He said that sounded like an expedient way to move forward. Ms. Feser said a table of the revisions could be created and the council could approve/not approve each one or make further revisions to what is proposed." Further, the citizens of Edmonds have been kept "in -the -dark" on this revision process in contradiction to what Council members requested. Page 21 of the Minutes of the April 5, 2022 Council Meeting states "Councilmember L. Johnson said the majority of those comments have been provided at council meetings or emailed. Not Packet Pg. 68 7.4.a everyone is comfortable attending meetings or organized enough to submit their comments. If people still want to submit comments, she asked where they should be sent and what was the deadline. She asked if there would be any outreach for addition comments. Ms. Feser said there is a specific email for comments on the PROS Plan, prosplan@Edmondswa.gov. A schedule will be established and distributed including the mailing list of individuals involved with the process who requested to be on a notification email list, the typical avenues such as social media as well as other avenues to get the word out." THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED! A quick review of the 300+ page document indicates many of the public concerns HAVE NOT been addressed. Without the Revision Table that Ms. Feser said she'd prepare, there is no way Council members can determine if gaps and deficiencies have been addressed. Lastly, this whole update process has been missing a critical element, and that is a report on if/how the planned actions in the current 6-year PROS Plan have been addressed or need to continue. Submitted on: 6/12/2022 11:53:16 PM Name: Willard Magnuson City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Building Development Code U) c m E E 0 U v 0 a c m Comments: Greetings, Thank you all for all your efforts towards creating a forward thinking development code. This is very important work for the community. I wish I could participate but will not be able. Ita€TMs easy for design discussions to focus on the minor elements and misinformation. My hope is that the focus will be towards what we want our core areas and associated spaces/structures to be and not a debate about personal preference of esthetics. This should be a discussion of function. What are the required components and how do they create the desired sense of place for our community? Thank you, Will Magnuson Packet Pg. 69 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E060722 Special Packet Pg. 70 8.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES June 7, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember (joined meeting 6:42 p.m.) Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER STAFF PRESENT Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator ALSO PRESENT Brook Roberts, Student Representative The Edmonds City Council special meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(I) At 6:00 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced that the city council would meet in executive session to discuss pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). Elected officials present at the executive session were Mayor Nelson, and Councilmembers K. Johnson, Tibbott, Buckshnis, Paine, Olson, L. Johnson, and Chen. City Attorney Jeff Taraday was also present. At 6:15 p.m. Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended for 5 minutes. At 6:20 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended for 5 minutes. At 6:26 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended until 6:30 p.m. The executive session concluded at 6:27 p.m. 3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION: NO ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Nelson reconvened the special City Council meeting at 6:29 p.m. 4. INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARD OR COMMITTEE 1. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO A BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Samuel Spencer, candidate for appointment to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), open position #8, citizen. Council President Olson welcomed Mr. Spencer and invited him to describe his interest in the HPC (responses in italics). Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 71 I retired 20 years ago, I've been with Gallery North for almost 15 years. I am interested in getting involved in the history of Edmonds and writing a book to pick up where Ray Cloud's book stopped. I was excited to be invited to join the HPC. Councilmember K. Johnson said she has known Sam for over a dozen years and believes he will be a wonderful addition to the HPC. She is the council liaison to HPC and looked forward to seeing him at meetings. Council President Olson asked where he lived previously. I originally moved to Mill Creek from New Orleans 37-38 years ago and moved to the Perrinville area approximately 6-7 years ago. Council President Olson asked if he knew of another town with great architectural character besides New Orleans. It's hard to beat New Orleans when it comes to architecture. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she met Sam through the thrift store where she also volunteers and anticipated he would be a perfect fit for this position. She asked his thoughts about designating the bowl as a historic district. When a building is designated historic, the owner gives up certain rights so obviously the owners would have a big say in that. I would be 100% in favor of it for public buildings. Council President Olson advised his appointment is on the Consent Agenda and once that is approved, his appointment is approved. 2. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO A BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Yuri Nishiyama, candidate for appointment to the Sister City Commission. Council President Olson welcomed Yuri and invited her to describe her interest in the SCC (responses in italics). I was born, raised and educated in Kobe City, Japan. I was interested in coming to the U.S. to graduate from college. I applied for and was granted a full scholarship at Seattle Pacific University. I came to the U.S. when I was 19 and attended SPU. I wanted to work in an office so I went to community college for two years and majored in office management, and then graduated from the University of Washington, majoring in anthropology. I lived in Seattle for 41 years. Edmonds is a lot like Kobe and I wanted to live in a smaller city so I sold my house and purchased a condo, my dream home, in February 2021 at SO Pine Street overlooking the bay and Mt. Baker. I have been enjoying the artistic small city. I was involved with Seattle's Sister City program with Kobe and discovered that Edmonds has a sister city relationship with Hekinan. I knew Hekinan through my nephew's wife and although I've never been there, I've heard a lot about it. Councilmember Tibbott commented on her background working with sister cities. Knowing Japan like she does, he asked what Edmonds sights she would like to introduce the Hekinan delegation to. If they are younger students, I found out when doing the exchange student program with Seattle, the things they found the most outstanding were horseback riding and sailing because they do not have an opportunity to do that in Japan. There is water in Japan, but having a boat and going sailing is very unique. Councilmember Paine thanked Yuri for choosing Edmonds. Her partner grew up in Kobe for the first 12 years of his life as part of a diplomatic attachment with his family. She recognized Yuri's marvelous background, and thanked her for volunteering for the SCC. Councilmember L. Johnson welcomed Yuri to Edmonds, commenting she was glad she chose to live here. She enjoyed reading her application and appreciated her willingness to devote her time, energy and experience to Edmonds. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 72 8.1.a Council President Olson commented depending on how much she wants to work, her experience would also be amazing on the Economic Development Commission. Council President Olson advised her appointment is on the Consent Agenda and once that is approved, her appointment is approved. I feel humble to be able to contribute my time, effort and background regarding Japan. I have also taught Japanese language and culture. I am happy to contribute my time and experience to the City's relationship with Hekinan. 3. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO A BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Gillian Young, Sales & Marketing Rep, Best Western Plus Harbor Inn, for appointment to the Edmonds Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC), position #1 tax provider. Council President Olson welcomed Ms. Young and invited her to describe her background (responses in italics). I live and work in Edmonds. I love Edmonds, am a member of the Chamber and volunteer regularly. My background is in sales for over 10+ years. We bought a house in Edmonds in July 2021 and I have a lot of free time. I love running this hotel and meeting people from around the world. I was honored and excited to be nominated. Councilmember L. Johnson welcomed Ms. Young, relaying her understanding that the Harbor Inn is regularly at capacity or very busy which is good news. A group performing at the ECA is here now. Things have totally picked up from the pandemic and the hotel is almost entirely sold out through July. Councilmember L. Johnson commented that is good news for the hotel and for Edmonds. She is also new to LTAC and offered to meet with Gillian to discuss the unique ideas that LTAC is discussing to improve and enhance tourism within Edmonds. Spending money on multiple day events is a great way to generate lodging tax. Councilmember L. Johnson commented there is a lot of creating thinking on the LTAC and she was excited to have Gillian join. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she is the perfect choice for this as she works at the hotel. She hoped to see her involved in the creative district which the hotel is part of. I am aware of the creative district. When I first started learning about areas of the town, I learned the hotel was not included in the downtown district but I was not entirely sure of the boundaries of the creative district. We hope to be added to the Art Walk to bring people to the Harbor Square area. Councilmember K. Johnson relayed she served on the LTAC for several years. The tax is locally called "heads in beds," and the money is spent to enhance the experience and increase the number of overnight visitors to the City for festivals like the Bird Fest, the Art Festival, 4t' of July, etc. LTAC has discussed progressive things like a trolley to connect key points such as Harbor Square, the ferry and downtown Edmonds, but that was put off during the pandemic. There are a lot of opportunities to support the arts in Edmonds. She looked forward to Gillian's input on the committee. I love the trolley idea. I recently proposed to the hotel owners purchasing bikes to connect the hotel to other areas. I am excited to join the LTAC. Council President Olson advised her appointment is on the Consent Agenda and once that is approved, her appointment is approved. 5. ADJOURN With no further business, the special council meeting was adjourned at 6:51 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 73 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E060722 Packet Pg. 74 8.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES June 7, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Brook Roberts, Student Representative 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Rob English, Acting Public Works Director Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Casey Colley, Youth Commission Coordinator Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Q N Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the o original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip o Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We w respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection c with the land and water." E 3. ROLL CALL +° Q City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PRESENTATIONS RESOLUTION CONDEMNING GUN VIOLENCE AND RACIAL HATRED Councilmember Paine read a Resolution of the city council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, condemning the gun violence, both nationally and here locally, which has occurred over the past several Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 75 8.2.a weeks and the racial hatred which has fueled this violence; expressing condolences to those impacted; and issuing a call to action for all in our community to work towards ending gun violence and hatred in our community. Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for the resolution and thanked Councilmember Paine for the work she did putting it together and the additional documentation. He proposed a minor amendment to whereas 10, remove "white nationalism" and insert "them." There are many groups that support racism and hateful ideologies, not just white nationalism. Inserting "them" covers all the groups who might support racism and hateful ideologies. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO REMOVE "WHITE NATIONALISM" AND INSERT "THEM" IN THE LOTH WHEREAS. Councilmember L. Johnson commented without naming it, it will be harder to address. White nationalism is on the rise and by not naming it, the council is doing a disservice to what is actually going on. It is white supremacy rebranded with new language and it has seeped into politics and can be seen at the federal level and especially boys being indoctrinated into it. The use of "them" seems as if the council is afraid to say it; it needs to be named and called what it is. She did not support the proposed change as it dilutes the hard work Councilmember Paine did, it is the council trying to tiptoe around the issue, and it waters down the intent of the resolution. Councilmember Paine expressed the hope that the council would support the resolution as submitted. She referred to what happened in Buffalo, New York and what has happened nationally. Commemorating D- Day, the Battle of Midway and the atrocities of WWII illustrate how damaging white nationalism is to the community. It has been 78 years since D-day, when Allied troops gave blood. There was bloodshed across the nation this last weekend and overwhelmingly atrocious gun violence. Kids are afraid to go to school, parents are afraid to send their children to school. She urged the council to support the resolution as history cannot be ignored. Council President Olson asked if Councilmember Tibbott would accept a friendly amendment and retain a "white nationalism" and add "other hate ideologies." N N 1- COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, m TO ADD "OTHER HATE IDEOLOGIES." w Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for that amendment or listing the 4-5 groups. Councilmember Paine commented hateful ideologies is already in that whereas and she preferred the resolution remain as is. She did not think the resolution would be controversial considering all the recent a history. Councilmember Chen thanked and applauded Councilmember Paine for her hard work drafting the resolution. It is the right thing to do to point out what the United States is experiencing as a nation and he supported the proposed amendment to add "hate ideology." He pointed out in the shooting in California, the shooter was an Asian American; not all shootings are done by white nationalism. He expressed support for the amendment to add "other hate ideology" to the 10' whereas. Mayor Nelson restated the substitute amendment: TO ADD "OTHER HATE IDEOLOGIES." Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 76 8.2.a UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER PAINE VOTING NO. Councilmember L. Johnson proposed amending section 2, paragraph A, to read, "wish to do harm." She was concerned with attaching semi -automatic firearms to the statement "to harm themselves," and preferred it refer to harm to others. She said the current wording touched on suicide which is not what this resolution addresses. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO CHANGE SECTION 2, PARAGRAPH A TO "WISH TO DO HARM." UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. YOUTH COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT AND SENIOR RECOGNITION Youth Commission members Julie Andres, Sam Yi, Finn Paynich, and Aaron Nateephaisan were present. Deputy Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts and Human Services Director Shannon Burley provided an introduction. Youth Commission Coordinator Casey Colley reviewed: ° U • Congratulating graduating seniors c o Owen Lee (they/he) ■ Attending Occidental College to study Critical Theory & Social Justice or Urban & i Environmental Policy a ■ Enjoyed getting to participate in and learn firsthand about government decision -making a ■ Plans to stay engaged with politics and government while also focusing on community N organizing and other forms of social change o o Sydney Pearson (she/her) to 0 ■ Attending Scripps College leaning towards social sciences and humanities W ■ Has valued getting to understand city government while learning how to make an impact through politics and seeing changes in the community from work our commission has E accomplished ■ Wants to work directly with members of the greater community in my college area and to a advocate for mental health resources and programs on campus o Aaron Nateephaisan (he/him) ■ Plans to take a pre-med track and pursue a career in healthcare. ■ Attending the University of California- Los Angeles (UCLA) to study Human Biology and Society. ■ Enjoyed interacting with the community in a new way and helping our community by volunteering my time and offering opinions on diverse topics. ■ Plans to be involved in government. UCLA offers human biology and society, which focuses on health disparities within different communities and highlights the role of government and policies in these issues. o Brooke Rinehimer (she/her) ■ Pursuing a degree in chemical engineering at the University of California, Santa Barbara Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 77 8.2.a ■ Enjoyed creating positive change for youth in the City of Edmonds and gaining a much richer understanding of advocating for change ■ No current plans to continue involvement with politics or government but would like to do so o Audrey Lim (she/her) ■ Attending the University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley), Political Science and Economics at Haas School of Business ■ Wants to get involved with international affairs and work for the United Nations ■ Enjoyed learning about how the municipal government functions and witnessing how powerful youth voice can be o Finn Paynich (they/them) ■ Attending Cornish College of the Arts for a BFA in musical theater ■ Loved the people they met and the opportunities to make real political change —It was inspiring and empowering ■ Hoping to use a passion for arts to make change in the performing world and have a platform to speak out on issues relating to equity, inclusion, justice, and the planet o Brook Roberts (he/him) Sam Yi reviewed: Introduction c o This has largely been a transition year for the Youth Commission. A continuation of COVID protocols, Casey Colley's maternity leave, and a majority of the commission preparing to graduate have all contributed to an atypical 2021-2022 Youth Commission term. Activities and Accomplishments o Added social media manager position 0 o Established committees (Mental health committee, environmental committee, diversity c committee, youth in government committee) o PROS plan participation i o Released a statement on the status of the strEATeries a o Edmonds Food Bank volunteering every Monday Q o Partnership for Earth Day beach cleanup event cm o Attended WLYAC and Office Of Equity Task Force meeting o o Began regular attendance at other boards/commissions to o Youth Guide To Government (Brook Roberts) w o Introduction to Youth Court (Audrey Lim and Sam Yi) Speakers during the Past Year E o Tabatha Shoemake, Community Engagement Officer at the Edmonds Police Department o Civic park artist Clark Wiegman Q o Andrea Petzel, Founder and Principal of Broadview Planning, LLC o Human Services Division o Chris Collier, Alliance for Affordable Housing Program Coordinator, Housing Authority of Snohomish County Aaron Nateephaisan reviewed: • Activities We Hope to Continue Next Year o Youth Court o Updating mental health resources o Regular attendance at Edmonds Food Bank o Regular attendance at other board/commission meetings o Partnership for Earth Day beach cleanup • Goals for the Upcoming Year Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 78 8.2.a o Higher participation inside and outside of meetings o Improved community presence as COVID restrictions continue to lift o A consistent social media presence to get in touch with youth Council President Olson thanked the youth commission for their service to the City, commenting she had a chance to get to know a few members. She noted five of the seven seniors are going to school in California and she hoped they would be back. Councilmember Tibbott commented it is always great to hear about the youth commission's activities and accomplishments. He asked what volunteer activity could be used to promote the youth commission to other youth who have not been involved with the commission's activities. Sam Yi answered one of the best ways to inform people about the youth commission is to engage in schools, and visit classrooms, clubs or social areas where students who like to make change congregate and offer them the opportunity. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was honored to be the council liaison to the youth commission this year. She commented the world is at your fingertips, they will all do great, and she was happy they were going to all these interesting schools. She appreciated their dedication and thanked Owen Lee and Brook Roberts for spending time with her on their projects. She looked forward to working with the remaining youth commissioners next year. Councilmember L. Johnson said the youth commission was by far her favorite council appointment. She was fortunate to be spend two years with these awesome leaders and it was an honor to have a front row seat to everything they accomplished and are still planning to accomplish. She looked forward to sharing the Youth Guide to Government with her kids and said the Youth Court is a fabulous idea. She applauded everything the youth commission did to raise awareness about mental health issues, specifically among teens and all the collaboration they did. She congratulated and thanked the graduating seniors and looked forward to all that they will accomplish. Councilmember Chen thanked the youth commission and congratulated them on all their a accomplishments, commenting the members are so young and have already accomplished so much in a their lives. They are full of ambition and energy and will change the world. He worked with several youth N commission members including Owen and Brook and was amazed by their energy and knowledge and cm their drive to change the community and the world. He congratulated the commission on their success and o thanked them for their service. w c Councilmember Paine commented the youth commission always knocks it out of the park, brings it full E force, does many things the community appreciates and speaks with a varied but young voice which is very exciting. She recognized the seniors for their work, commenting she was jealous they were heading to college, something that would be her first choice of things to do. She encouraged commissioners to a stay in touch with each other and with the council and to stay involved. She suggested forming an impromptu alumni group and continue to be a resource for the community and themselves. Mayor Nelson commented although he cannot have favorites among boards and commissions, the youth commission is his favorite. He wished them all the best. As a California native, he was confident the students would visit California and return to Washington. Youth commissioner are leaders and he looked forward to the wonderful things they will do in the future. He thanked them for their contributions to date and looked forward to future accomplishments. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described the procedures for in -person audience comments. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 79 8.2.a Scott Simpson, Edmonds, commented everyone in Edmonds would appreciate having salmon in Shell Creek and Yost Park again, with the exception of the owners of 625 Carole Way, Brian Washburn and Vanitha Vihongkham, who built an illegal dam on their property that prevents salmon from going upstream to Yost Park. He referred to an image from Zillow.com, 2 of 16, a picture of Shell Creek in their backyard with natural steps in the creek and no dam when the picture taken. They bought that house in 2014 and in the past 8 years built an unpermitted dam in their backyard which was also within the time period the state adopted regulations to prevent stream restriction. At the March 22, 2022 council meeting, he requested a line be included in the PROS Plan indicating the council's support for citizens' efforts to have the dam removed. Councilmember Chen expressed his appreciation for being made aware of the dam but nothing has been done. Bringing salmon back to Yost Park would not only improve the experience of many Edmonds residents who walk the park, but would improve the park's entire ecosystem at no cost to the City. He was not asking for the building department to pursue the illegal building of the dam without a permit or for the state to enforce their regulation; all he was asking was for the council to approve a motion to show where the council stands on this issue. He suggested adding the following to the PROS Plan, "assist citizens in their efforts to have a dam blocking salmon in Shell Creek removed." Laurie Sorenson, Edmonds, expressed her thanks and appreciation to the council, stating she was deeply grateful for what they do to keep the City safe and reading the extensive materials in the packet requires a lot of personal sacrifice. She also thanked staff for their hard work. She expressed support for the recommendation in chapter 9 item 2 in the PROS Plan to expand the marsh to include the Unocal property. Given the well-known effects of climate change and potential species extinction, it is a moral imperative to restore this nearshore habitat. She was excited the council was putting that in writing and backing the plan. However, she did not see a plan for the connection between Marina Park and the marsh. In general she would like to see more detail in the plan regarding salmon recovery and environmental stewardship. Once the council has approved including the Unocal property, she recommended the City make those plans known to the legislature and the powers that be. She recognized Ecology will not done for years, but believed funding needed to be in place. She was interested in council showing leadership, possibly with the public's assistance. Gerald Bernstein, Edmonds, referred to the resolution regarding the problem with shootings, N commenting the shootings that have been experienced in the United States over the last month and in the cm past are a tragedy. With regard to the statement that the largest number of deaths for a certain age group o of young people was from gun violence, it should be pointed out that this is overwhelming in inner cities w by gang warfare, related to money, drug trafficking and protecting their turf. Making a blanket statement without that clarification does not give the whole story. It has been aggravated by the recent defund the E police concept because it has taken police out of the protective position in the inner cities. He is from Chicago which is now nearly unlivable. Identifying one race and others does not cut it; it is not just one race. Emphasizing whites is a racist idea, white supremacist and white nationalism are popular these days a but are unprovable and he and others do not believe it is true. Caleb Nichols, Edmonds, former co-chair and founding member of the youth commission, expressed disappointment over the ban on camping in Edmonds. As housing prices rise in the greater Seattle area, many people choose to live in their vehicles to make ends meet. This action criminalizes people in Edmonds rather than providing sustainable solutions to the problem of rising housing prices and housing insecurity. As someone with family members who live in their vehicles who are gainfully employed, he found it disturbing that they could be imprisoned simply for visiting him. He hoped the council would take the time to address the root causes of housing security and reverse this decision. With regard to the resolution proposed earlier, white nationalism is the prevalent threat today and to hide from that fact is hiding from the truth. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 80 8.2.a [No name given], spoke regarding the equitable engagement framework, the bullying proclamation by the mayor and restated some previous comments made remotely related to drug abuse and fentanyl issues in the community. The opioid overdose crisis is out of control; fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, is 80-100 times stronger than morphine and about 50 times stronger than heroin and is commonly used to create counterfeit pills disguised as oxycodone, Xanax, Adderall, among others. It is virtually undetectable unless a strip is used and is so strong that even a small amount can kill a person. According to the CDC, over 150 people die every day from overdoses related to synthetic opioids like fentanyl. In 2021, the U.S. saw 108,000 overdoes, a nearly 50% increase over 2019 according to CDC data; two-thirds of the 108,000 drug overdose deaths involved fentanyl or other synthetic opioid. This issue dovetails directly to homelessness and crime issues seen in the community today. She implored the council, the city and the youth council to create an awareness and education program for youth in the city so they are aware of the potential threats to their lives and safety. She thanked the council and staff for everything they do. Fires seem to come up regularly and although she would rather be at home relaxing, she felt compelled to ask the mayor to find ways to show better leadership. Creating division in the City is not productive and preys on citizens' emotions who are living their lives. She requested the mayor rethink the way he communicates his concerns without involving more division. Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments. Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Edmonds, thanked the council for all they do, commenting it is a thankless job and she understood how stressful it could be at times. With regard to bullying on the council, she referred to a newspaper article regarding what has occurred on the Edmonds City Council. It is not all councilmembers, there is an issue with council leadership which the rest of the council needs to pay close attention to. The movement has occurred this year and perhaps the council needs to take action on it. Leadership is not always looking at the best for the citizens. With regard to the robbery that occurred off Highway 99 about two blocks from her house, she said residents expect this on a daily basis. For example, she is always worried her house will be broken whenever she leaves or that she or and her son will be harassed or perhaps robbed at a park. If this had occurred in downtown Edmonds on 5t' & Main, people would be totally up in arms; unfortunately, when it occurs in the uptown area, it receives less attention. She anticipated more would be seen regarding bullying of staff by council. N William Leiter, Edmonds, professional engineer, representing Robert Burnhoff, a neighbor of cm Perrinville Creek, spoke regarding the proposal to hire an outside consultant to prepare design up to 60% o for a total of $900,000. He applauded the City for doing the work but had several concerns. First, he w requested the council ask Mr. English if the City has a video inspection of their ductal iron pipe under the BNSF tracks that can be made available to the public. He has been documenting the degradation of that E pipe for 15 years including holes and lamination that is occurring and has been unable to get an answer from Mr. English whether the City has video inspection of the pipe. The Perrinville Creek culvert under Talbot Road cannot be replaced. Unfortunately, Mr. English has presupposed the outcome of the research a on the design in his memo. The pipe under Talbot Road is too steep and the only solution is a bridge that would allow the creek to return to its natural grade. The ductal iron pipe under the BNSF tracks should be replaced with a bridge or at the least, a countersunk box culvert to provide fish passage. The diversion structure, which is actually a flow splitter, cannot be reconstructed or recommissioned as Mr. English suggests in his memo. If WDFW has not already stated so, this permit will not be renewed. It was wrong to install that in the first place to benefit two downstream neighbors so they could have an English garden with a salmon stream through it. Obviously, the City cannot afford to maintain that for two people. The flow splitter needs to be removed and a new outfall installed to Puget Sound so Perrinville Creek can flow free. Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, commented on council changes to the PROS Plan: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 81 8.2.a 1. The City is failing to keep its commitments to the SR-99 area identified in Ordinance 4079. If the City is unwilling to keep its investment in public safety commitments, a public review of this ordinance and development on SR-99 must be undertaken. 2. The City is not siting park investments and critical infrastructure in accordance with the GMA. The vast majority of Edmonds residents agree that parks and recreation are essential to quality of life. The City's continual failure to site resources in gap areas is denial of an essential service to its residents. 3. The inclusive public process and needs assessment identified that park and open space investment should be prioritized in SR-99 and south Edmonds. Council changes to recommendation 2 and 3 must be deleted to be consistent with the public process and needs of the City. 4. The Edmonds Marsh was not prioritized by the inclusive public process or needs assessment. Council should not insert policy commitments for the City to purchase a contaminated site for more than $8 million. It is not a sound use of public funds and is not needed to restore the marsh. It is the connector version 2.0 and uses public funds to achieve outcomes that could easily be achieved through regulation. 5. Perrinville and Shell Creeks were not prioritized by the needs assessment, community meetings, or public survey. The council should not redirect funds from SR-99 and south Edmonds areas that were prioritized by the PROS Plan process. Siting open space in SR-99 and south Edmonds is consistent with the first and second priority regarding watersheds as identified by the City so there is no environmental excuse to redirect funds from these areas, it is just the council's personal preference for these pet areas. 6. The development of environmental priorities did not go through an inclusive, transparent public process and the council disregarded an open letter from the SR-99 community for an inclusive and transparent public process to occur. Council priorities for the Edmonds Marsh, Shell Creek and Yost Park should be deleted. 7. Council identified financial support for specific community groups that were not selected by the G U community or planning board during the public process. These should be deleted. c 8. The City needs to immediately conduct a scoping process for a SEPA environmental impact @ statement to reflect the council's changes. Land use and recreation are significantly impacted and c housing may be significantly impacted. Impacts must be evaluated according to Ordinance 4079, a GMA compliance as well as evaluating the loss of a large mixed use parcel downtown in conflict with a zoning if the council creates a policy commitment to purchase the Unocal property. The analysis must N include impact to housing and implementation of required population growth. cm 9. Council changes are institutionally racist because they redirect environmental investment from the o most diverse areas of the City with the most open space service gaps and the highest environmental w health disparities to the widest areas of the City with the least service gaps. The council cannot say they value all communities and then amend plans to redirect funds from underserved communities. If E the council values all communities, they need to critically reevaluate the more than $41 million in new investment downtown and prioritize access to the environment and health of all communities. Q Tom Murdoch, Director, Adopt a Stream Foundation, advised the Adopt A Stream Foundation in partnership with the City of Lynnwood and the Snohomish County Conservation District, will soon announce a unique program, Perrinville Creek Salmon and Trout Relief Fund. The objective of that effort is to reduce stormwater runoff from the Lynnwood portion of the Perrinville Creek Watershed flowing into Perrinville Creek and into Edmonds. The Adopt a Stream Foundation will work with residents in the Lynnwood portion of the Perrinville Creek watershed to install rain gardens that focus on reducing stormwater runoff flowing into Perrinville Creek and into Edmonds. With regard to the consultant contract associated with Perrinville Creek, he suggested the contract be modified to include that the design consider restoring the salmon run to Perrinville Creek. He has been looking at the creek for about 30 years; it used to have an excellent coho or silver salmon run. There is little mention of channelizing of the creek done without permits from the City or Department of Fisheries downstream from the two Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 82 splitter boxes Mr. Leiter mentioned. That channel needs to be reconfigured to accommodate stream flows from a stormwater perspective and provide suitable habitat for salmon. Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, said with the tree ordinance, Edmonds is knowingly violating the GMA by stealing and then charging for property rights only from those dividing vacant land, increasing home density and lowering house prices. If they built one home on their 1.2 acres, they would be free from City theft and extortion, but that would increase urban sprawl outside Edmonds. According to law, division should be allowed without charging them for or taking the rights to their property. Trees are the property of the owners whose land they grown on. The fact that land is vacant does not negate property rights. The council has been misled regarding how much control government is allowed on private property, vacant or developed. They purchased their land to build three homes for their family and love trees in the right place. The tree ordinance states division applications will be denied unless $3,000 to $12,000 payment for each tree removed is made and remaining trees are permanently signed over to the City as protected and written as such in future sales documents. Developed property owners need only volunteer trees as protected and can remove them from the list at any time. Edmonds has permanently taken property rights to every tree growing on all vacant land without just compensation, then charges owners for their own property before allowing for division. In the U.S., private property is the foundation of not only prosperity, but of freedom itself. Property rights are protected through common law, state law and the constitution. The rights of people to possess, control, protect, derive income from and dispose of freely. Ms. Ferkingstad continued, the supreme court treats property as a fundamental right, forbidding government from imposing arbitrary or irrational restrictions on its use. Both federal and state constitutions provide that the government may not take private property unless it is for a public use and — just compensation has been made. To legally own the rights to all trees on their property, compensation must be made equal to the extortion they are required to pay Edmonds for each tree. For their property, G that could be close to $1 million. In reality, if they sold all their trees, they would get $2,000, nowhere c near close to covering the cost of removing even the ones needed to site their homes. Treeless vacant @ properties are required to place six trees per 1/3 acre; they have to retain 24 huge trees on each 1/3 acre, c 41 % retention, pay the fee cap of $107,000 for removed trees and are forced to permanently sign their a property rights to the City with the hope that Deb Powers and Kernen Lien will approve their application. a By law they should not lose their rights or pay anything to the City for their trees. She urged the City to N following the law and restore property rights of new home buyers and vacant land owners to be equal to ti their neighbors without arbitrary regulations and takings and let people build homes. to w Joe Scordino, Edmonds, said he has spent much of the 40+ years he has lived in Edmonds in the woods and streams and has very personal knowledge of the outdoor environment. With regard to agenda item 8.2 E regarding the Perrinville Watershed Study, he requested the council consider amending the contract to have the contractor use the information analysis they will conduct to also provide alternatives for remediating the excess stormwater flow at the upper end of the watershed, a critical need and a great time a to get it done at the time the other study is done. With regard to agenda item 8.3, the PROS Plan, he urged the council to table action on this item until the council receives the revision table and the public is allowed to provide input which the council committed to at the April 5t1i meeting. He referenced his written comments and quotes from pages 20 and 21 of that meeting. As the council was not provided the information that was committed to, the council should not be taking action at this meeting. With regard to agenda item 8.4, the Tree Code, it is time for the council to reopen the urban forest management plan (UFMP). The tree code is supposed to implement the UFMP, but is not doing that. It would be time better spent to update and revise the UFMP to achieve the intended goals and objectives rather than continuing to fiddle with a tree code that is turning into a mess. With regard to agenda item 8.5, Waterfront Study, Mr. Scordino recommended the City begin the process of amending the comprehensive plan as there is no reason to wait until 2024. The study includes Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 83 8.2.a numerous recommendations; now is the perfect time to put those recommendations into the form of a comprehensive plan amendment with alternatives, start the public process to get public input, and get the comprehensive plan changed. The lack of essentially a viable comprehensive plan relative to that waterfront area affects the public's ability to work with state legislators and state agencies to find the least costly way for the City to utilize the Unocal property to restore the marsh. Unless that is fixed, it will cost the City millions if the process cannot start to get people on board with restoring salmon in Washington and utilizing that property for that purpose. He said council questions of City staff that pertain to accountability of the administration is not bullying, it is good governance. 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 25, 2022 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 24, 2022 3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 20, 2022 4. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS 5. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS 6. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 7. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE 8. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE 9. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE N N ti 10. RESOLUTION CONDEMNING GUN VIOLENCE AND RACIAL HATRED Co to 0 w 11. APPROVAL OF STORMWATER CODE (ECDC 18.30) UPDATE +� c m 12. APPROVAL OF RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION DOCUMENTS FOR COMMUNITY E t HEALTH CENTER (CHC) AS PART OF THE HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION & GATEWAY PROJECT — STAGE 2 Q 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS VACATION ACCRUAL FOR RETURNING EMPLOYEE HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson reported this item is related to an employee who is being rehired. The City's policies do not address vacation accrual for an employee who is rehired. The request is for the employee to be returned to the vacation accrual rate he was at prior to leaving the City's employment. This is something that should be considered in the policies long term. She has usually seen if someone is rehired within a year after leaving the organization, they are put back at the same seniority level they had when they left. The recommendation is to approve placing Brian Tuley, the information services manager, at the same vacation accrual rate, and allow him to take and accrue vacation in the first six months of Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 84 8.2.a employment. The City's current policy states an employee cannot use or accrue vacation during the probationary period. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE MR. TULEY'S VACATION ACCRUAL BASED ON HIS PRIOR YEARS OF SERVICE WITH EDMONDS (APPROXIMATELY 8.5 YEARS), EFFECTIVE ON HIS HIRE DATE OF 6/1/2022, AND 2) WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR HIM TO COMPLETE HIS PROBATIONARY PERIOD PRIOR TO THE ACCRUAL AND USE OF HIS VACATION. Council President Olson said she was thrilled Mr. Tuley missed the City and wanted to come back. Councilmember Paine observed this would give the employee the same rate of accrual for 8.5 years. She asked if he cashed out his vacation bank when he separated from the City or was more vacation being added. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered he would have received vacation and sick leave cash out per policy. This request is not loading the bank, which was cashed out, but placing him at his previous accrual rate rather than the accrual rate of a first year employee. Councilmember Paine was thrilled he returning. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed that was something that should be added to the City's policy. She recalled this happened one other time during her 12 years on council and the City was lucky to have both employees back. She thought it was going to be fixed last time and hoped it was fixed this time. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PRESENTATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ESA FOR DESIGN AND PERMITTING SERVICES FOR THE LOWER PERRINVILLE CREEK RECOVERY PROJECT Acting Public Works Director Rob English explained there are two items in the proposed scope, 1) an interim solution to reestablish the creek to the BNSF culvert below the diversion structure, and 2) look at i a permanent, long term solution to open the fish passage from Talbot Road to Puget Sound, a new creek a assignment and removing barriers at Talbot Road and BNSF. A request for qualifications was issued in a March and one firm, ESA, responded. Their contract is included in the packet. Presentations were made to N the parks & public works committee on May IOt'. Two presentations will be provided tonight, one by Co Senior Utilities Engineer Mike De Lilla related to the Tetra Tech study completed in 2015 and a second c presentation by ESA. w c Mr. De Lilla advised he will present the work that has been done since 2013 to present to help mitigate E flows within the Perrinville basin. In 2015 the Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit n Study was done to evaluate the entire basin to determine ways to decrease flows and scour for Perrinville a Creek. Those findings determined certain portions did not contribute to Perrinville creek including the east infiltration basin and the golf course in Lynnwood and the west basin in Edmonds. Current Basin Limits - 2015 Perrinville Creek Basin Flow Reduction Study (Tetra Tech — Figure 5) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 85 8.2.a Pugat Sound EAST INFILTRATION .'•' BASIN WEST BASIN City of Edmond City of Lynnwood ?'w t 99 4 LeganG _ 1 GOLF COURSE u irro,. Mr. De Lilla continued, the other findings were a majority of the basin has a 15-24 foot layer of glacial till which is low permeability soils which makes infiltration difficult. In 20% of the total area where the creek is located, there are more permeable soils, the same soil that causes scouring. Other findings were mitigating the 2-year storm was the cost effective for decreasing scour and flows. Otherwise, projects became very cost prohibitive and would have to be designed for a storm that no one can predict. Today's design standards are either 50 or 100 year storms. The study includes recommendation for projects for Edmonds and Lynnwood, 12 were selected, as well as recommendations to build rain gardens in private residences, and Perrinville specific code changes. Another findings was the post office site is the headwater for the Perrinville aquifer so the groundwater water levels at that location are quite high so costs for mitigation in that area would be much higher than the $450,000 per cfs limit they were trying to place. Mr. DeLilla reviewed: Possible Project criteria n 0 30 possible projects (14 Edmonds/16 Lynnwood) feasible sites Q o 12 recommended (7 Edmonds/5 Lynnwood) N ■ Meeting all 3 criteria below ti - Project cost below $450,000* per cfs of 2-year peak flow reduction to - Overall 2-year peak flow reduction greater than 0.15 cfs CD - Limited siting and construction constraints *2015 dollars Perrinville Flow Reduction Projects/Studies/Agreements (City) o Completed ■ (2013) Talbot Road Drainage Impr/Perrinville Creek Mitigation Q ■ (2015) Perrinville Flow Reduction Study ■ (2015) Drainage Improvements (Dellwood & 191 st - Raingardens and Infiltration) ■ (2016) Discussions with Snohomish County Conservation District (SCCD) for Municipal Raingarden Program ■ (2018) Seaview Infiltration Project (Phase 1) ■ (2019) Interlocal Agreement with SCCD* ■ (2020) 83rd Ave Raingardens ■ (2020) 81 st Ave Raingardens 0 2022 ■ Seaview Infiltration Project (Phase 2) Fall Construction ■ 83rd Ave Raingardens (Phase 2) Fall Construction ■ Geomorphology Study (In Progress) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 86 • City/Snohomish County Conservation District Improvements PRIVATE RAINGARDENS Number Year Installed Watershed 7905 189th Pl. SW 1 2019 Perrinville 8011 180th St. SW 1 2019 Perrinville 18605 79th Pl. W 1 2019 Perrinville 18505 83rd Ave. W 1 2017 Perrinville 7910 187th Pl. SW 1 2021 Perrinville 19011 78th Pl. W 1 2021 Perrinville 7904 191st St. SW 1 2021 Perrinville 7628 191st St. SW 1 2021 Perrinville 8204 182nd Pl. SW 1 2021 Perrinville 7912 191st St. SW 1 2021 Perrinville • Updates to City Codes Specific to Perrinville Basin o Development Retrofit (applies to existing unmitigated impervious surfaces to remain): ■ 25% _> 50% (currently 25% citywide) ■ 0% in 2015 i o Flow control: Match 50-year peak => Match 100-year peak (ie. King County Level 3 Standard) for developments of 10,000sf or more impervious surface area o Edmonds currently in discussions with Lynnwood to make code changes so that these a requirements are applicable there as well. S • Lynnwood Accomplishments m o Completed ■ (2016) Maximizing the volume of stormwater going into the Lynndale Park infiltration gallery under the dog park. Exceeding its design capacity and performing well. c ■ (2016/2017) Retrofit to the Blue Ridge Pond. ■ (2017) Lynnwood Elementary School is 100% infiltration. ° ■ (2017) 12 rain gardens with the Snohomish County Conservation District c o 2022 n ■ Stream Keepers plan on installing 6-10 rain gardens with the Perrinville Creek Salmon Q and Trout Relief fund this summer. N N ti Jon Ambrose, Hydrologist and Geomorphologist, Engineering Group Director, ESA, reviewed: Q • ESA Team Roles w o All team members have experience on nearby Meadowdale Park Restoration at the railroad o Environmental Science Associates (ESA) ° ■ Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling/Design ■ Geomorphology° ■ Restoration Engineering Q ■ Fish Ecology ■ Permitting o Hanson Professional Services ■ Railroad and Road Bridge Engineering o Shannon & Wilson ■ Geotechnical Engineering o Duane Hartman & Associates ■ Survey Sediment Source Investigation Ongoing Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 87 8.2.a Sediment Source Investigation Ongoing o Photos of Perrinville Creek ■ Debris jam, sediment accumulation that is likely fish passage barrier ■ Layer of less permeable till overlaying thick lenses of highly erodible advanced outwash and massive deposits of erodible sand seen in Perrinville Creek • Proposed Scope of Work for Interim Action and 60% Design of Long -Term Solution at Railroad and Talbot Road o Preparing Necessary Information for Infrastructure and Stream Design ■ Topographic survey, hydraulic modeling and hydrology, geotechnical investigation, geomorphic analysis/sediment transport, and cultural resources assessment o Design of Interim Action(stream channel and diversion structure modification) ■ Including emergency permits 0 60% Design of Long -Term Solution Railroad Crossing and Talbot Road ■ Structural engineering, bridge design, stream challenge design ■ Permitting o Public Engagement and City council Engagement, Stakeholder Meetings ■ 12 different meetings planned with city council members and public o Project management Proposed Sequencing N 1. Interim action — in summer 2022, excavate new stream channel from diversion structure to 0 BNSF culvert to 2. Long-term solution design — replace undersized culverts through BNSF embankment with w property sized bridge or box culvert 3. Watershed management recommendations/activities E 4. Fish passage at Talbot Road — replace undersized culvert at Talbot Road with properly sized bridge or culvert W Interim Action Alternatives Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 88 8.2.a i Dashed lines show three alternative alignments for interim action Maintenance of diversion under 2/3 alternatives These have been presented to WDFW, tribes, and landowners Creek o Properly size replacement structure through BNSF railroad embankment o Properly sized channel and stream mouth o Eliminate diversion o Properly sized replacement structure at Talbot Road o Sediment management upstream Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 89 N N I- Q to 0 w c m E 0 2 Q 8.2.a Paul Schlenger, ESA, reviewed: • Why focus on lower creek when there are problems throughout the watershed? o Most important part for salmon ■ Currently no salmon access to creek ■ No access for spawning by coho, chum, steelhead or sea -run cutthroat trout ■ No access for rearing by juvenile chinook o Stream routed entirely through City's diversion pipe due to no steam channel (filled with sediment) ■ City has to restore creek to an open channel to restore fish passage ■ Urgent to do this during summer/early fall to allow salmon to return to spawn and rear Councilmember K. Johnson referred to the statement that coho could be returned for spawning and asked if they would be able to spawn in the short section between the Talbot culvert and Puget Sound. Mr. Schlenger responded yes, there is a short reach below Talbot Road that could potentially support some spawning. Councilmember Buckshnis commented this will be very costly and there is an infrastructure bill with funding for projects like this and now there is a culvert replacement bill. She asked about outreach to the legislature and others groups for funding such as WRIA 8 for chinook recovery, or if the City was planning to bear the entire cost. Mr. English assured securing grants to help design and construct the project would be one of the efforts. In meetings with a couple of legislators earlier in the year, they indicated the need to have conceptual plans in place and potential opportunities for grant programs. This contract with ESA will assist with obtaining future grants. There are also opportunities with the City of Lynnwood and Snohomish County. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if this contract had morphed enough to include the long-term watershed issues that were disclosed in the PowerPoint. She recalled Joe Scordino suggested expanding the contract to cover the entire reach. Mr. English answered the scope that Mr. Scordino referred to would be an added effort. This contract focuses on the lower reach and the sediment evaluation and assessment. N Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the contract scope could be expanded tonight or should that be done o in the future. She was aware the lower reach needed to be designed now, but it would be nice to have a to 0 package prepared to present to funding partners. She noted looking at the situation is enough, and the W slides from the presentation are great. A package needs to be prepared because there are funding c opportunities available and other jurisdictions are getting funds because their projects are ready. Mr. E English said there could be a conversation with ESA about a feasibility study for upstream options. The Tetra Tech study was the initial assessment and a lot of good projects came out of that study. There can be continued study to determine other opportunities. There are challenges within basin due to high ground a water and identifying areas within the basin for infiltration. Councilmember Buckshnis recognized ECA also worked on the Meadowdale Beach project. She recalled William Leiter thinks the culvert under the railroad tracks has deteriorated enough that there may be a train derailment, another reason for urgency in doing the project now for the short-term effect as well as the culvert issue. Mr. Ambrose responded when the structural engineers are assessing the site, they could also look at the condition of the pipe under the railroad if that is an extreme concern for the City. Mr. Schlenger added one of the early steps is sizing what the replacement would look like. Through their work on Meadowdale and other projects, they are becoming more familiar with BNSF. They believe the current BNSF culvert is undersized; if it is undersized, that leads to a conversation with BNSF to explore their participation in the cost. When they reach that point, he expected BNSF to inspect their own culvert. That information would be provided via this contract, either via ESA or BNSF. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 90 8.2.a Councilmember Tibbott echoed the request for partnerships in future projects. He did not support using more ARPA funds for this in the future and preferred to utilize partnerships. This contract will help leverage other funding sources for restoration. The contract includes $157,00 to study the railroad box culvert/bridge idea; he asked if it was urgent to do that now. The railroad tends to be slow to participate and he wondered if that could be removed from this contract. Mr. Ambrose responded the most critical piece of the entire project is replacing the railroad crossing; the earlier that can start, the earlier it can be completed. BNSF requires any applicant go through a lengthy process, a minimum evaluation to demonstrate lack of capacity, bringing them a 10% design to enter their grade review process. ESA's recommendation and the most effective component of the entire design is replacing the culvert under the railroad. Councilmember Tibbott said he tends to agree, but he viewed it as pushing a string to get something done. The entity that will pull this loose needs to be identified to ensure BNSF's participation happens. He did not see the City being able to tilt the scale toward involvement from BNSF. Mr. Schlenger answered information provided through designs provided and reviewed sequential by BNSF is getting their agreement on what a replacement structure looks like, whether it's a box culvert or a bridge and then working through their design process. That will facilitate BNSF's support and approval for the project. That has been done in part with the way the team has been constructed because Hanson Professional Services and Shannon & Wilson often work with BNSF. A bridge to carry a train is a specialized bridge and requires specialists in this team and having that review opens doors to other funding sources. They have been in discussions with BNSF so if they are familiar with the project and it has gone through their review, they can ask for a letter of support and/or partnership for grants. There are grants the City is eligible for and other rail specific grants as well as funding in the Infrastructure Act. This design opens the door to more partnerships with BNSF on rail grant funding sources. Councilmember Paine referred to the photograph of the 15' sand lens and asked if that was on Perrinville Creek or was it an example. Mr. Ambrose answered that is a photograph from Perrinville Creek and is c approximately 35'. Perrinville Creek has significant erodible geologic lenses so that is a long-term issue. a Sedimentation will not stop and is expected to continue episodically in response to rainfall and flow, as a well as due to mass wasting and landslides. N N ti Councilmember Paine said in looking at the pictures and listening to the presentation, it seems the o broadest access point for sand to flow to create eel grass beds, etc. for nearshore habitat would be at Puget w Sound. She asked about the cost differential between a box culvert under Talbot Road vs. a bridge, recalling the prior public works director said Talbot Road was at risk for washing out with a large storm. E Mr. Ambrose answered as part of their scope of work, the structural engineer will look at various alternatives. The City had a study completed by Herrera in the last five years that looked at three different culvert replacement alternatives. There is different bridge technology since then. There is a steep a embankment with a steep slope; they will look to the structural engineer to make a recommendation and cost is certainly a consideration. Function and cost is part of any analysis they do. Mr. Schlenger added for a crossing like that, there are state standards for a culvert versus a bridge and it would meet the minimum size according to those standards, stream simulation, etc. Councilmember Paine asked if it would be a 100-year or 50-year minimum size. Mr. Ambrose answered there are multiple requirements for new fish passage structures, both width and height; height requires three feet of freeboard for a 100-year storm. It would have to pass a 100-year storm, but it also requires enough width to have a naturally moving channel under the roadway. The current crossing width at Talbot is a 30" pipe; Herrera recommended a 16' crossing. Councilmember Paine commented she was eager to get this started. She echoed the request to search out funding sources, commenting it was long past time and she was aware of the timing of the fish window to get this underway. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 91 8.2.a With regard to the sequence of work necessary to address the Perrinville Creek issues, Councilmember L. Johnson recalled the explanation about doing the BNSF bridge/culvert first and Talbot Road second due to the sediment. She asked if the same logic holds for work needed up stream; that it makes the most sense to approve this step to move the needle with BNSF and provide more access to available funding sources. Mr. Schlenger recommended working in both areas simultaneously. In the lower portion of the creek, the railroad needs to be addressed first, because when the Talbot Road crossing is unleash, all that sediment will head to the railroad crossing and it needs to be able to go out into Puget Sound. If funds are available that does not preclude doing both at the same time. Councilmember L. Johnson asked what was the key portion of the creek. Mr. Ambrose answered the key portion is from Talbot Road to Puget Sound. As part of this scope of work, they will be looking at opportunities to reduce the magnitude and timing of the delivery of sediment. He provided those pictures so people can get a sense of the magnitude of the situation. Access in upper Perrinville Creek is very difficult. They will identify areas and opportunities to reduce sediment quantities, but the reality is, it is a high sediment load river. There is really nothing that can be done to eliminate the fact that sediment will move under Talbot Road and through the stream channel but it needs to move out to Puget Sound. That is the bottleneck now, between Talbot Road and Puget Sound. If a new channel and crossing can be accommodated under the railroad bridge, large episodes of sediment transport can be accommodated in Perrinville Creek. There is nothing that can be done to eliminate that possibility; it needs to be designed to accommodate that reality and doing that requires a better channel alignment, a larger channel and most importantly, a larger crossing under the railroad. Councilmember Chen commented on the urgency of the projects. He has visited the creek at the McLaughlin and Flynn residences and knows about their situations. To him it seemed like things were being done backwards. The picture of the person near the massive deposits of erodible sand in Perrinville Creek is alarming. A landslide could be the result of a storm or the changing climate and there is a possibility that things could get worse. He suggested looking at a holistic design. Without knowing what will happen upstream, he questioned spending efforts downstream to design a bridge or culvert and only guessing at the size that would be necessary to accommodate the situation. Not to diminish the importance of downstream, he recommended understanding the upstream situation before investing in downstream solutions. Mr. Schlenger responded the upstream study is ongoing and that information will be available during the proposed lower Perrinville contract. Councilmember Chen observed the $906,000 proposed project is just a design. He asked about the estimated cost to construct the interim solution. Mr. Ambrose answered early estimates were developed last year, he recalled it was under $500,000, but at the time modifications to the diversion that likely will be required in an interim solution had not been fleshed out. There are no structures, no new culverts, no structural engineering, no geotechnical engineering required. It is a much similar process, but is just interim until the railroad crossing is upgraded. With regard to Councilmember Chen's prior question, he explained the project is not doing anything backward. What is known for certain is that there will be large volumes of sediment moving down Perrinville Creek, that it is geologically unstable, and that it has vast amounts of sediment that will be moving downstream, down Talbot Road and through private property. Completely mitigating for that delivery of sediment is nearly impossible to do completely; the appropriate design approach in their opinion is to accommodate what they know is a certainty in terms of where it comes from. This is an eroding gully that will continue to move sediment down to a problem area. They will also look for opportunities to arrest that sediment delivery. Councilmember Chen suggested the council keep in mind that the proposal is to invest $1.5 million in an interim design. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ESA. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 92 8.2.a With regard to Councilmember Chen's comment, Mr. English explained the $906,000 contract contains two tasks, first the interim solution which is $80,0004100,000 of $906,000; the balance is the design to 60% and the permitting effort for the long-term solution. It is a big investment and gives momentum for the long term solution in solving the culvert at the BNSF tracks as well as Talbot. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested adding to the contract dealing with the excess stormwater in the upper reach in the future. She asked if the contract addressed that. Mr. English answered the contract does not address that. That would need to be considered as part of a feasibility study for opportunities in the upper portion of the watershed. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if she should make an amendment or would staff promise to do it. Mr. English suggested staff talk to ESA and come back to council. Councilmember K. Johnson asked how much it will cost to go from 60% design to 100% design on this project. Mr. English answered he did not have a good number. If $800,000 is invested for permitting and 60% design, he anticipated another $400,000 would be necessary depending on the alignment and efforts with BNSF. Mr. Ambrose said one thing to consider with designs like this is 60% design is 100% geotechnical design, it is very advanced structural engineering, the nature of the structure, the size and location has been agreed to, agreement has been reached with BNSF on their review, there will have been a robust public engagement process, and input received from agencies, tribes and co -managers. He anticipated it could be a smooth process to move from 60% to 100% design given the robustness of this initial effort. He summarized the project will get far with this effort. Councilmember K. Johnson observed in addition to this study, there will be some money required for 100% design and some money to implement the interim design. She summarized the total cost sounded like $1.9 million. Mr. English responded there isn't a good number for construction of the interim portion if that can happen this summer. Councilmember K. Johnson said her point was it was not just this project, but several other segments of the same task. Mr. English agreed, this contract will provide an interim design; there will need to be a separate contract to construct it. The balance of the contract will get the process pretty far down the road toward a permanent solution, but there funds will be necessary to finish that design and to actually build it in the future. City Attorney Jeff Taraday added, getting to 60% design will open up grant funding opportunities. While N it is true additional money will be required to get from 60% design to 100% and additional money for ti construction, everyone is optimistic that once the project gets to 60%, the City will be able to take o advantage of funding partnerships. This project is a prerequisite to get to that point. w c MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. E t Council President Olson commented it was clear the council was not going to get through all the agenda items. Staff prioritized the agenda items as PROS Plan, Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study, and Tree Code a Updates. With the time remaining she asked if the council wanted review the Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study or stop after the PROS Plan. It was the unanimous consensus of council for the PROS Plan to be the last item on the agenda other than Mayor and Council Comments. 3. 2022 PROS (PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE) PLAN Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts and Human Services Director Angie Feser reviewed: • PROS Plan Overview o Purpose ■ The PROS Plan is a 6-year guide for managing and enhancing parks, open space, trails and recreational opportunities for the Edmonds community ■ Plan adoption required to retain eligibility for state and federal grants. o Community Engagement Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 93 8.2.a $u VeYS Planning Virtual Board & [ity Public Council Meetings Informed, Inclusive, Engaged Online Events & Outreach Tabling (web & social) Stakeholder Discussions ■ Community Survey - Total responses: 1,958 Random -sample mail: 501 (20%) Online community -wide: 1,457 ■ 2 Virtual Public Meetings - - 60 Attendees participated ■ Website / Social Media - Ongoing - Chinese, English, Korean, Spanish ■ Events & Tabling - Uptown Market ■ Community feedback - Project email list - Public comments - written and verbal - Primary focus • Equity/diversity Dive Park @ Brackett's North • Southwest Snohomish County Park • Environmental stewardship Edmonds Marsh/Estuary ■ 8 Planning Board sessions - Scope of work review: Jan 27th - Work session: May 26th - Update and Goals: Nov loth - Plan overview: Jan 12th - Public hearing: Jan 26th - Subcommittee session: Feb 3rd - Recommendation Review: Feb 9th - Public hearing: Feb 23rd ■ City Council sessions - Study session: Feb 1st - Capital List (Parks & PW Committee): Mar 8th - Public Hearings: Mar 15th & Mar 22" d - Revision Proposal: Apr 5t1i - Final Review: June 7th N N ti 0 to 0 w c m E 0 2 Q • Plan revisions o Added executive summary o Add full set of maps - Interlocal Agreements (ILA) hashing o Trails maps updated - 76th Avenue bike lane o Capital Facilities Plan Table expanded to include costs sequenced over 6 years Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 94 o Addition of new objective to Goal 3 to highlight partnerships and ILAs o Relocated Goals & Objectives to precede Capital Planning & Implementation (Ch 9) o Minor staff edits and errata corrections o Chapter 9 Key Recommendation/Action Initiatives (Highlighted in Attachment #2) Steve Duh, Conservation Techniques, was present to answer questions. Councilmember Paine commented the gaps identified via public feedback have been addressed. However, the document with changes to chapter 9 was new topics and was not received through the normal planning board and other public outreach processes. She asked where that information came from. Ms. Feser responded Councilmember Paine may be referring to a document provided by Council President Olson that was referenced in the packet in an attempt create a compromise. The document contained things Council President Olson had heard and learned from individuals in the community who were interested in changes. Council President Olson emailed that information to her, asking that she consider them as revisions to the PROS Plan. All the revisions in the document were considered; some were incorporated and some were not. She considered that as input and feedback from the council just as emails and comments she received from other councilmembers. Councilmember Paine expressed concern that it did not go through a more public vetting. She was glad Ms. Feser and the consultant reviewed it, but it seemed to circumvent the normal public process by providing it to Ms. Feser without sharing it with the full council. She found that a bit of a surprise, that it seemed to circumvent the public engagement process that the City paid a lot of money for. Councilmember Buckshnis commented there have been changes. A similar example is the urban forest management plan which included a very detailed public process; rather than send it back to the consultant, it went through a group. There are numerous other examples. She summarized the changes that have been made are great although she still sees some gaps. She referred to the April 5,2022 minutes that indicate a table would be provided which is in chapter 9. Councilmember Buckshnis said in reading the 2022 PROS Plan, it was difficult to follow as she did not a do a compare and contrast with the old plan; some people had a problem with not being able to see all the N changes that had been made. During a previous review, a table highlighting the changes was provided; in ti this update, people did not realize that chapter 9 outlined the revisions. She suggested an amendment to related to combining the Edmonds Marsh estuary and Marina Beach in the capital planning process. The w original grant proposal had it as one project, Daylighting of Willow Creek and it included funds for the hydrology project. In 2019, those were separated with the marsh going into stormwater and Marina Beach E going into parks. That resulted in two different granting cycles and a design that was not sanctioned by council. The waterfront study quotes that report, but it was never council sanctioned. Q Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not want the marsh and Marina Beach separated in future grant applications because the systems starts at Marina Beach and flows into the marsh. The council should not be putting money aside to design the marsh or Marina Beach until the Unocal property is resolved. She liked the suggestion made during audience comments about the barrier on Shell Creek and putting that in the PROS Plan. She suggested adding Shell Creek or the watershed to the section that describes creeks. She expressed appreciation for the work Ms. Feser did with the consultant, commenting the plan is greatly improved. Councilmember L. Johnson commented when this first came to the council, one of the most significant things to her was, as highlighted in the message from the director, emphasis on diversity and equity and the outreach efforts to more inclusively capture the community's ever evolving priorities related to parks, open space, trails, recreation facilities and programing. She highlighted everything in the document that Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 95 8.2.a talked about DEI aspect and steps taken to engage with the community. One in particular, equity, inclusivity and accessibility (page 690), maintaining and enhancing social equity across recreational opportunities and facilities should be a core function of municipal park and recreation systems. Through the PROS Plan, the City of Edmonds made a concerted effort to reach out to, connect with, and engage its historically under -represented communities. The City also invested in and committed to outreach in four major languages of the community, Chinese, English, Korean, Spanish. Also with substantial past investment in downtown, the City is reexamining the distribution of parks and recreation resource investments to other areas of the City with the goal to advance equity across Edmonds. The outreach was vast and statistically significant. Councilmember L. Johnson continued, the PROS Plan states the City did one thing, but now the end result is something else and it was clear to her that a few have had a very outsized influence on the plan. They identified what they thought should be included in the PROS Plan and portions were included; however, the narrative regarding the process has not been corrected. The plan describes the process and celebrates how it was done, but that is not what has happened and those claims can no longer be made. If the council intends to move forward with the revised PROS Plan, then the claims regarding the outreach need to reflect what actually happened. She was unsure that could be accomplished tonight. Councilmember Tibbott thanked Ms. Feser for the work done on the PROS Plan. He was impressed how public comment had been woven into the plan and with specific implementation steps outlined in chapter 9. He recalled from the outreach that the top amenities people were looking for were walking paths and trails, both within parks and providing connectivity between parks. He asked how ideas for future improvements such as in Mathay Ballinger Park could be included. Ms. Feser answered the way to do that on an annual basis is through the capital budget process. The parks & public works committee has been working through the capital program, and during that process, projects can be vetted and brought forward. The PROS Plan is used to inform that effort, but the council's decisions through the budget process are how priority projects are approved. Obviously, everything on the list cannot be accomplished, but the PROS Plan helps inform the capital program. Councilmember Tibbott summarized a decision package would be presented for council consideration. a For example, the council may want to prioritize improvements in an underserved part of the City and N decision packages could be proposed for those in the annual budget. Ms. Feser agreed, advising if a ti priority project is not included as a decision package, council can suggest or propose a decision package.. o w Council President Olson commented when the outreach was done and questions were asked, the feedback not very environmental. This is an update to the 2016 PROS Plan which was more environmental. While E she agreed with the councilmember's comment that the feedback from the process was somewhat different than the council additions, it was because the feedback did not represent what the council wanted the park's exclusive focus to be and were trying to add back in more environmental emphasis that a existed in a degree in the 2016 PROS Plan. That does not water down the feedback from citizens related to park locations, activities and amenities, it just adds focus on the environment which was missing. She did not hold it against citizens who did not contribute that input, but as a representative of the entire community who has a responsibility for environmental stewardship, she felt good about the changes and input by council. The process honored citizens' input and the document she provided was the result of citizen input received through the PROS Plan process. Many of items in the document were not environmentally focused, they were other inputs from other pockets of the community who wanted to ensure there was emphasis on ADA, trails, municipal code updates, etc. Council President Olson referred to the book the council read, "Getting to Yes," and at the time there was discussion about forming a council subcommittee. Starting from a single document is one of the ways to move toward agreement and then people make edits, similar to what Ms. Feser did with the consultant. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 96 The document was intended to be a starting point. At the time she provided it, there were plans to form a council committee and it was intended as a place to start. Councilmember K. Johnson expressed appreciation for chapter 9 and offered a minor revision to item 1 in recommendation #2, Open Space & Conservation Acquisition, adding Shellabarger Creek. Shellabarger Creek feeds into the marsh and there are several opportunities for acquisitions. With regard to chapter 9, Councilmember Paine objected to how the changes came to council despite what others have said. She had no changes to recommendation #1 or #2. She recommended item 9 in recommendation #3 be deleted (Develop a master plan encompassing the city -owned Edmonds Marsh and Marina Beach Park and the Unocal property once acquired). That will likely take until 2028-2030 due to time Ecology is taking to release the Unocal property. The cleanup likely will not be complete until 2024 followed by a 2-year period for reassessment and retesting. Marina Beach Park is an important estuary access point; however it looks now, there are opportunities to get funding and development in the future. She referred to the $1 million in grants, commenting Marina Beach is basically the tailpipe to two major watersheds on the west side of Edmonds. It is important not to hinder grant opportunities for Marina Beach and the Edmonds Marsh. Councilmember Paine continued, it is unknow when the Unocal property will be released. The timeline in item 9 will be impossible to accomplished before the end of this PROS Plan. She suggested rewriting that so it does not hinge on property that the City does not own or for which there is not a solid timeline. There is already a Marina Beach master plan and it may be desirable to do something similar for the Edmonds Marsh as well but that should be delayed until there is some status on the Unocal property. The PROS Plan includes recreation; Marina Beach had a nice recreation aspect to it. Ms. Feser asked for clarification, whether the request was to delete item 9 entirely or modify it so it was c not contingent upon the purchase of the Unocal property. Councilmember Paine answered she wanted it separated so it was not contingent on the Unocal property. Ms. Feser summarized it could be rewritten so c the Unocal property purchase would not hold up moving forward on a planning process that encompasses a the Edmonds Marsh and Marina Beach Park together. Councilmember Paine answered there is a master a plan for Marina Beach. The grants were not accepted due to council's request. Tying a major portion of N the public waterfront to private property does not make sense. ti 0 to Councilmember Paine requested adding to item 2 in recommendation #8, "and in partnership with w community groups." She recommended changing item 3 in recommendation #8 to read, "Develop and continue partnerships with and financial support of community groups" and not list the organizations. An E outreach plan should be for all things and not strictly environmental groups, but be as broad as possible. Listing only a few organizations makes it too narrow. Q Councilmember Buckshnis disagreed with Councilmember Paine's comment about the master plan and Marina Beach and the Edmonds Marsh. She is on the grant committee and has read hundreds of grant applications. The only reason Marina Beach and the Edmonds Marsh were separated was because the council made the decision in 2019 to separate the Edmonds Marsh into stormwater and Marina Beach into parks and recreation. Separate grant proposals were submitted; public works did not receive a grant because WRIA 8 recommended looking at the entire project. The Meadowdale Beach project is one project that includes recreational aspects. She recalled one of the reason for the Marina Beach master plan was to get rid of the dog park. She suggested adding to the survey whether the City should purchase the Unocal property, recalling in the 2016 PROS Plan, there was interest in having the entire project become a natural wildlife habitat due to its urban location. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 23 Packet Pg. 97 8.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis continued, the cleanup of the Unocal property will be beneficial to wildlife and could provide a free -flowing lagoon, etc. She acknowledged it takes time to restore property, efforts to restore Taylor Creek in Seattle have been ongoing for 20 years and it is just now getting to the point of construction. She was not in a hurry to do anything but wanted to maintain a holistic approach to assist with obtaining grant funds or to seek funding to purchase the property from an organization like Forterra. The council removed the marsh from stormwater because it is not a stormwater project although there are stormwater aspects to it. It is basically a nearshore estuary that she hoped can be restored in the next six years. The 2016 PROS Plan included the marsh due to its importance to the ecosystem and there was no concern about the timing. Council President Olson commented there were downsides to spending money on a master plan prior to acquiring land as it could end up being wasted money. Ms. Feser agreed that is the challenge with the Unocal property, the marsh and Marina Beach; it would be nice to move forward with a plan that incorporates all those parcels, but without ownership, a purchase and sale agreement, or permission from the land owner to do a planning process, it could be fiscally irresponsible. If something did not work out with the Unocal property, the expense and time for that planning effort would no longer be applicable. The City is not able to apply for grants on property where there is not a purchase and sale agreement or permission from the owner. The City is two owners away, Unocal has to hand over the property to WSDOT and then WSDOT will go through the process of selling it or figuring out a way for the City to acquire it in some capacity, not necessarily acquisition. It is a great concept, but she was unsure it was wise to do it in the short term. Council President Olson said the language "once acquired" covers that and is also a placeholder so it is not forgotten in the next PROS Plan update. With regard to holistic, the council chose not go forward with the Marina Beach project, because as a recreation area alone, it is not a spending priority. Council is interested in spending in underserved areas that need recreation space. Barring it being part of a holistic project, she did not see moving forward with Marina Beach as a separate project. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, a MOVED TO VOTE TO KEEP ITEM 9, RECOMMENDATION #3 AS PROPOSED BY STAFF ON Q PACKET PAGE 929. N N ti Councilmember Chen thanked Ms. Feser and the team for their excellent work and their patience with this m process. This is the most comprehensive PRO Plan the council has experienced. The process has stressed w equity, inclusion and outreach, an effort that he applauds. He referred to packet page 832, Lake Ballinger Access, the only public access to Lake Ballinger on the Edmonds side. Edmonds owns half the lake; he lives in that neighborhood and visits the area often. The access point is overgrown, the bench is half broken, and there is no access to the lake. The Capital Improvement & Planning Opportunities listed° include adding a permanent base under the bench and improving the waterfront. He requested adding Q another capital improvement opportunity, consider adding a fishing pier for residents' use. Mountlake Terrace has made tremendous improvements on the other side of the lake, including a fishing pier. Although the City's access point is not a large area, it is the only access to Lake Ballinger in the Uptown area. Councilmember Chen referred to Maintenance Considerations for Lake Ballinger Access which state "none noted." However, the picture for that item illustrates tremendous maintenance needs. With regard to equity, inclusion and outreach, the picture says it all. He suggested adding "continuing ongoing maintenance." Councilmember Tibbott asked whether developing a master plan assumed the Unocal property had been acquired and if so, did it need to be included in the sentence. Council President Olson answered it is included. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his support for the motion. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 24 Packet Pg. 98 8.2.a Councilmember Paine said she wouldn't mind supporting this motion if there were equal monetary expenditures in other parts of the City as well, and not just the Edmonds waterfront. With regard to Councilmember Chen's recommendation, she agreed with the idea of a fishing pier at Lake Ballinger Access, commenting she grew up near a lake with numerous fishing piers. It is a great local place to build community and residents can walk there. She was interested in equity balance in the PROS Plan in terms of dollars spent. She did not support retaining item 9 in recommendation #3 as it causes problems. She summarized the City needs to address the equity issue. Councilmember L. Johnson commented throughout the document there is a description of where ideas came from such as from outreach, surveys, etc. The public process was transparent and the source of the input is clear. Now there is another portion of input that came through the council president with the indication the information was provided by citizens. There was no public process or understanding of exactly where the information came from like there was for the other feedback. Due to those concerns, she did not support the motion. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND 10:30. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO EXTEND TO 10:20. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Chen's comment to include maintenance c considerations for Lake Ballinger Access. She suggested an ILA, noting Mountlake Terrace is planning the golf course property. She was unsure where to put it in the PROS Plan, but suggested a goal to discuss o with Mountlake Terrace the creation of a recreational park area in the golf course property, now called a Lake Ballinger Park. She questioned whether the Lake Ballinger Access was part of Lake Ballinger Park. a Ms. Feser responded the western side of Lake Ballinger Park is in Edmonds city limits. There is the N possibility of accessing Lake Ballinger Park from the west from the Interurban Trail. Encouraging ILAs o and partnerships was added to goal 3. Councilmember Buckshnis recommended being more specific, such to as adding item 6 to recommendation #6 related to working with Mountlake Terrace on an access point for w recreation on the Edmonds side of Lake Ballinger. m E Councilmember Chen asked what would be the best way for him to propose an amendment to the PROS Plan to include, 1) adding a fishing pier to Lake Ballinger access, and 2) working with the City of a Mountlake Terrace on an ILA to use part of their park to build a recreational area because there is no land on the Edmonds side. Ms. Feser suggested making a motion for each. A fishing pier could easily be added as an amenity for the Lake Ballinger Access and she could develop language regarding working with Mountlake Terrace via an ILA or a collaborative effort in joint development and access of Lake Ballinger Park on the eastern Edmonds border. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO ADD A FISHING PIER TO THE LAKE BALLINGER ACCESS AT THE LAKE BALLINGER WATERFRONT. Council President Olson recalled the fishing pier in Edmonds was a joint venture with the Port and WSDOT and asked the cost for a fishing pier. Ms. Feser answered quite a bit of research would be required. It is a heavily permitted use and she was not sure it was doable because it creates a structure in Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 25 Packet Pg. 99 8.2.a the water body. That is one of the challenges with that site; even though it looks very simple, lawn up to the water's edge and a bench, it is shoreline which requires a lot of permitting and design work. It is not impossible, but takes a lot of time and effort. Staff can definitely research a fishing pier. Another option would be to talk to Mountlake Terrace about the northwest corner of Lake Ballinger and using the western access to the park from the Interurban Trail and a path to a fishing pier on the northwest portion of the lake. That might be a better option than a fishing pier on the narrow lake access. Staff could explore both options. Council President Olson asked if the motion as stated would cover exploration and possible action based on research. Ms. Feser suggested stating explore the option of installing a fishing pier at Lake Ballinger in conjunction with Mountlake Terrace or any amenity including a fishing pier. Councilmember Chen clarified his motion was to consider adding a fishing pier. Councilmember L. Johnson said she personally found the idea of a fishing pier exciting. However, it was very off the cuff and does not include a public process. While she may find it exciting, she did not have direction from community saying that was what they want or what would be most beneficial to them. She feared the City spending time and money on that without having conversations with the community about things that would be more beneficial. She noted a fishing pier is a community -wide benefit and she questioned whether was what the Lake Ballinger/Highway 99 area needed the most. She did not have that answer and her concern was spending time and money on something off the cuff. There needs to be a better process to determine if this is the right direction. Councilmember Paine agreed shoreline development would be a rigorous process. She will support the motion as it is a good idea for further investigation. The City can also take it out on the dog and pony show to truth test it. Councilmember Chen clarified his motion, consider adding a fishing pier, was not saying do it tomorrow. He acknowledge it was a long process. Projects in the PROS Plan will include public processes and outreach in many languages. N Council President Olson said she was conflicted as a lot of good points have been made. She recalled the cm point Ms. Feser made earlier about the budget process being a good time for council to add projects. o Including this project in the budget, which includes hearings, would be an opportunity to hear whether it w is an amenity the community would be exited to add, instead of adding it to the PROS Plan. Considering a CD fishing pier involves spending time and resources. She leaned toward not supporting the motion and E getting more input from the community. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE CALLED THE QUESTION. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION Q FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND PAINE AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AMEND TO EXPLORE OPTIONS WITH THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FOR ACCESS AND POSSIBLE JOINT DEVELOPMENT FOR LAKE BALLINGER PARK WHICH COULD INCLUDE A FISHING PIER. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled trying to do a gazebo at the dog park in 2008/2009; a lot of money was wasted due to shoreline regulations. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 26 Packet Pg. 100 8.2.a Councilmember L. Johnson expressed concern with off the cuff amendments. If the council is identifying things that they think would be beneficial for the community, she suggested also researching a satellite community center with programs and outreach that the neighborhood could walk to. She also recommended upgrading the playground, installing more robust equipment and benches. She did not want to limit what was possible and feasible for the most underserved area of the community. Councilmember Chen hoped the council would focus on parks and recreation amenities. Council President Olson said the general point is correct; the community has been asked what specific things they want. She asked Ms. Feser if there was enough in the PROS Plan to give her the latitude to pursue something like talking with Mountlake Terrace about improving access and a fishing pier. Ms. Feser answered that is included in new goal 3, objective 11, coordinate for and implement additional facility partnership and/or joint use operating agreements with the Edmonds School District, Snohomish County and neighboring jurisdictions. Neighboring jurisdictions are Shoreline, Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood. There is enough in the PROS Plan for staff to do that work. Council President Olson asked if the language in the PROS Plan was preferrable instead of identifying specific items. Ms. Feser answered it was council's discretion; if council wants to include more specifics in the PROS Plan for Mountlake Terrace and Lake Ballinger, that can be done. Mayor Nelson restated the amendment: TO EXPLORE OPTIONS WITH THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FOR ACCESS AND POSSIBLE JOINT DEVELOPMENT FOR LAKE BALLINGER. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Olson referred to the partnerships listed in item 3, recommendation #8, and asked if there was value to staff, who refer back to the PROS Plan, to have those detailed. The statement also states other organizations and volunteer groups. Ms. Feser answered it tends to call out specific groups more than others and may give some prioritization to those that are listed versus other groups. Council President Olson asked if that was a positive or negative. Ms. Feser answered it was probably not a positive because an organization may not want to come forward if they saw a number of other organizations listed. Eliminating the specificity still creates the opportunity but does not limit or given the perspective of a limitation. Council President Olson suggested rewriting it to include environmental and community groups. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND TO 10:30. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mayor Nelson restated the motion as amended: TO ADD A FISHING PIER TO THE LAKE BALLINGER ACCESS AT THE LAKE BALLINGER WATERFRONT AND EXPLORE OPTIONS WITH THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FOR ACCESS AND POSSIBLE JOINT DEVELOPMENT FOR LAKE BALLINGER. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR ACQUIRING PROPERTY TO CREATE A SATELLITE COMMUNITY CENTER IN THE LAKE BALLINGER OR SOUTH EDMONDS AREA. Councilmember L. Johnson commented without knowing what is the most feasible or what is the preferred direction from the community, if one amenity is highlighted, other options should also be highlighted and not limited. N N ti 0 to 0 w c m E t 0 2 Q Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 27 Packet Pg. 101 8.2.a UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO ADD IN ITEM 4, RECOMMENDATION #3, PARK DEVELOPMENT AND ENHANCEMENT, "EXPLORE OPTIONS TO UPGRADE, ENHANCE OR REPLACE PARK AMENITIES, SPECIFICALLY THE PLAY AMENITIES AT MATHAY BALLINGER PARK." Councilmember L. Johnson commented there are no schools in that area, there is one park with limited offerings, and this is a park that should be considered for upgrading what is offered. She was glad restrooms, benches and tables were listed, but the play structure could be enhanced to offer more to the community. Councilmember Tibbott said this was a good example of something that could be proposed as a decision package so he would not support the motion although he was supportive of replacing equipment. The parks & recreation department has a schedule for replacing equipment. Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out the parks department regularly inspects and upgrades play equipment, usually on a rotating basis throughout the City. The amendment is unnecessary as it is part of the regular park maintenance work. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to page 146 which describes Mathay Ballinger Park including capital improvement and planning opportunities and maintenance considerations. As Councilmember Tibbott said, parks has a schedule for park upgrades. Council President Olson referred to the Park & Facility Condition Assessment Matrix on PROS Plan page 39 (packet page 725) and asked about Mathay Ballinger Park. Ms. Feser answered there are definitely some opportunities for amenity additions to Mathay Ballinger that would be a great return on investment. Council President Olson commented she thought it was tongue in cheek when councilmembers mentioned g identifying specific projects, but that seems to be what is happening. In the interest of not continuing to N tweak the plan, if it is already a high priority in the matrix, she will vote no on the motion. Ms. Feser o explained the parks capital program includes capital replacement projects. The City has heard through the w PROS Plan that Mathay Ballinger Park needs some investment and it will be one of the parks at the top of .. the list. The PROS Plan helps prioritize projects that are brought forward in the budget. Council President CD Olson commented it was clear from past discussions that that park and that underserved area is a council E priority. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON AMENDED HER MOTION TO LEAD WITH Q IMPROVEMENTS AT MATHAY BALLINGER PARK. THE SECONDER AGREED. Ms. Feser asked if the motion was to amend recommend 3.4 to say Mathay Ballinger Park has prioritization in that group or just to include a statement regarding the priority of improvements at Mathay Ballinger Park. Councilmember L. Johnson answered she was open to the most appropriate place to include that; there are a couple places in the PROS Plan that reference the matrix. She wants Mathay Ballinger Park to be at the top of the schedule, so wherever it was most appropriate to highlight that. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 28 Packet Pg. 102 COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO PUT APPROVAL OF THE 2022 PROS PLAN ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THESE CHANGES IMPLEMENTED. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND PAINE AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. 4. TREE CODE UPDATES Due to the late hour, this item was postponed. 5. EDMONDS WATERFRONT ISSUES STUDY Due to the late hour, this item was postponed. 9. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS 12. ADJOURN The council meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. N N ti O O O W r-� C E t 0 2 r� Q Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2022 Page 29 Packet Pg. 103 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of Council Committee Minutes Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Committee Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative The Council committee meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: PSPP061422 FC061422 PPW061422 Packet Pg. 104 8.3.a PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING June 14, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair) Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director Councilmember Susan Paine Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office Scott Passey, City Clerk Other Councilmembers Present Councilmember Buckshnis 1. CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPP Committee meeting was called to order at 4:30 p.m. by Councilmember L. Johnson. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Ordinance to Add Human Services to PSPP Committee Councilmember Paine commented it makes sense to add human services to the PSPP to have more oversight through the committee process and PSPP is the right committee as includes both public safety and planning. A brief discussion followed regarding support for adding human services to the PSPP Committee. Action: Consent Agenda 2. Ordinance Amending ECC 5.27.210 regarding Fireworks Fines Mr. Taraday advised this ordinance was requested by the mayor. The effect of the ordinance is to correct the inadvertent inclusion of language that has the effect of creating a much higher fee than was represented when the ordinance was brought forward. If the language remains as is, the Public Safety and Education Assessment (PSEA) has the effect of adding to the base fine of $500 for a first offense and making it a total penalty of $1,025. If the language in the proposed ordinance is approved, the total fine is $500 and the base fine is reduced to $243.90. The city attorney's office does not have recommendation, it is how much the council wants fines for fireworks violations to be. Questions and discussion followed regarding the regulations in RCW 70.77.111 versus Edmonds' ban, whether a violation of Edmonds law equates to a violation of state law, automatic addition of PSEA to current fines, the council's discretion in setting the base fine, automatic imposition of the PSEA, purpose and use of the PSEA fine, whether there is a PSEA assessment for a second offense, the court's discretion over the base fines, and how the amount of the PSEA is calculated. Mr. Taraday offered to conduct further research during the PSPP meeting. The council returned to this item following the conclusion of other agenda items. Discussion continued regarding the amount of the PSEA in RCW 3.62.090; inability for courts to suspend or waive the PSEA; applicability of PSEA to any fine, forfeiture or penalty assessed; whether to the lower the base fine in view of the PSEA; base fee as a percentage of the PSEA; whether the court has discretion to reduce the base fine; fine as a deterrent; cost of implementing this ordinance; and referencing the state PSEA in the City's ordinance. Mr. Taraday will research whether the court has discretion to lower the base fine. Action: Full council Packet Pg. 105 8.3.a 06/14/22 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 2 3. Opioid Settlement Participation Form Ms. Cates advised this is a continuation of a discussion regarding the One Washington Memorandum of Understanding regarding the settlement with opioid distributors. The settlement participation form that the state is asking all municipalities to sign is part of the settlement reached for $518 million to be paid over 17 years. The settlement requires all litigating municipalities (Edmonds is not one) and 90% of others in the state over 10,000 population to sign it and if they do not, the distributors have the option of deciding whether to enter into the settlement agreement or not. The State Attorney General's Office is encouraging all municipalities to sign. Questions and discussion followed regarding Edmonds not accepting funds and having its funds distributed by Snohomish County and how that would happen logistically. Staff will draft a letter supporting the mayor signing a letter of commitment. Action: Consent Agenda 4. Missing Middle Grant Application Ms. McLaughlin explained the Department of Commerce has offered jurisdictions over 20,000 population up to $100,000 to study missing middle housing, conduct a racial equity analysis and address anti -displacement policies. The City is required to do this work and the grant will help fund technical studies. The grant requires the analysis include 30% of lots currently zoned single family; it does not require adopting changes to 30% of single family zoning. The funds can also be used for informational material for the public, conducting outreach and packaging recommendations to city council. The grant requires a letter of commitment from the mayor; the mayor wanted this presented to committee to get council support for the commitment letter. Questions and discussion followed regarding anti -displacement policies and ensuring the equity analysis includes race and income levels. Staff will draft a letter supporting the mayor signing a letter of commitment. Action: Consent Agenda 5. Employment Agreement - Executive Assistant to City Council Ms. Cates recalled the council contracted with two individuals to job share the position of executive assistant. One of those employees has left the position and the other has agreed to move to a full-time position if the council agrees to certain changes to the terms of the employment agreement. She reviewed changes to the agreement including increasing the hourly rate from $35.00 to $38.36, which is Step 1 of pay range NR-33. This will allow the employee to receive step increases and COLAs that other non -represented employees receive. The NR policy provides a step increase after six months which is September 1, 2022 and another January 1, 2023 and every January 1 thereafter provided the agreement is renewed. Other changes include deleting reference to "this part-time position" in Section 4.1 and adjusting vacation and sick leave for a 40-hour/week employee; the remainder of the agreement is unchanged. Questions and discussion followed regarding changes made to reflect current duties and whether this position serves as backup videographer for council meetings. Action: Consent Agenda once it is clarified whether one of the position's duties is backup videographer. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 5:23 p.m. Packet Pg. 106 8.3.b FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING June 14, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair) Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Councilmember Will Chen Scott Passey, City Clerk Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order in the City Council Conference Room and virtually at 5:30 p.m. by Councilmember Buckshnis. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. April 2022 Monthly Financial Report Finance staff was not present. Committee members raised the following issues: • What are the future plan for funds invested with Snohomish County pool and the state pool? • Non departmental is down • REET is down slightly • Public Works is down 53% Action: Consent Agenda 11% Is that due to the director's salary? 2. 2022 State Auditor Office (SAO) Audit Exit Follow Up 6 Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the City distributed funds to businesses according to its own 'o criteria. A letter was sent to the businesses in January to confirm they were still in business and a stating the loan would convert to a grant and requesting a response. She did not recall seeing the Q letter and she questioned whether council should have been involved in converting the loans to grants N as the amount distributed $1.2 million which was over the mayor's limit. c� 0 Mr. Taraday said he has not reviewed the meeting minutes, ordinance or other documentation that U Councilmember Buckshnis' question implicates. He recalled the council authorized grants, not loans, r with certain conditions consistent with federal law and the CARES program. One of the conditions was to incentivize businesses to remain in business and the loan -to -grant structure was a vehicle to E make that happen. Assuming his recollection was accurate, no further council authorization was required because the council had already authorized the grants. The grants were structured as a loan Q for the purpose of enforcing the grant conditions. Questions and discussion followed regarding the grant conditions, lack of data, actual business losses during specific months of the year, number of businesses who responded to the letter, next steps in response to audit findings, whether the City wants to treat businesses who did not suffer a loss and were dishonest in obtaining a grant the same as businesses who suffered a loss but do not have a detailed month -to -month breakdown of their loss, who will conduct a grant audit, amount of resources the City wants to devote to conducting a grant audit, whether businesses had to have a physical Edmonds address, small businesses who did not apply, and whether to pursue criminal action if investigation concludes there was dishonesty rather than just asking for the funds to be paid back. Action: Further discussion at next month's meeting. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Packet Pg. 107 8.3.c PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING June 14, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Other Councilmembers Present Councilmember Diane Buckshnis CALL TO ORDER Staff Participating Virtually Rob English, Acting Public Works Director Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural Arts & Human Serv. Dir. Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online PPW Committee meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. by Councilmember Tibbott. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS City of Lynnwood/Meadowdale Park ILA 2022 Expenditure Request Ms. Feser explained the cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds have an ILA for Meadowdale Park. In January Lynnwood was planning a simple renovation to the existing playground with a total project of $200,000 (Edmonds' portion of the cost was $100,000). In April Lynnwood notified her the renovations were upgraded to a fully inclusive playground and the cost of the project was closer to $500,000 (Edmonds' portion of the cost was $248,538. She described potential funding sources for Edmond's portion of the project: Yost Pool replaster project savings $94,500 Greenhouse replacement relocation committed donation to cover this expenditure $50,000 Civic Park Stormwater Mitigation Project (If ARPA funding is allocated to cover this expenditure) $104,038 Total $248,538 Ms. Feser said another option is to provide $100,000, half the amount the City was originally quoted. The committee may want to staff to discuss the ILA with the full council in view of anticipated requests in future years including a sizeable contribution from Edmonds in 2025 of nearly $1 million. Questions and discussion followed regarding support to bring this to full council, learning from past ILAs as the City enters into ILAs with other cities, preference to have this expenditure in the CIP, projects Lynnwood delayed due to COVID, whether Edmonds School District will contribute to the playground, grant from Snohomish County, whether the inclusive playground should be located at the elementary school across the street, upgrades made to the baseball fields in 2017, Edmonds' responsibility for maintenance under the ILA, concern this was not a good investment for Edmonds at this time, and arbitration process between parties. Action: Full council 2. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas Related to Design Services for Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Protect Packet Pg. 108 8.3.c 06/14/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 Mr. English explained this is a supplemental agreement to an existing contract. The supplement recognizes the change of the consultant's name as well as extends the completion date from June 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022 to complete all federal documentation and preform the record as-builts. Action: Consent Agenda 3. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas Related to Construction Management Services for Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Protect Mr. English advised the supplement recognizes change of the consultant's name as well as extends the completion date from June 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022. Action: Consent Agenda 4. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas for 76th Ave and 220th Ave Intersection Improvements Proiect Mr. English advised the supplement recognizes the change of the consultant's name. Action: Consent Agenda 5. Presentation of Right of Entry and Maintenance Agreement between City of Edmonds and Property Owner at 21000 Highway 99 Mr. English explained right of entry and maintenance agreement with the property owner would allow the City to enter the property on the west side of Highway 99 adjacent to the north gateway sign in the center median to plant it; the contract includes a one-year plant establishment period. At the end of the one-year period, the landscaping will be maintained by the property owner. This differs from the original proposal made at the end of last year that included purchasing the right-of-way where the landscaping would be planted. The City did not purchase the property, but is proposing an agreement with the property owner for landscaping and maintenance for one year. Questions and discussion followed regarding preparation of the agreement by the city attorney's office and the location of the landscaping covered by the agreement. Action: Consent Agenda. 6. Project Update for the 76th Ave. W C& 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements Project Mr. Hauss provided an introduction: • Federal grants secured o Design $702,000 ($232,000 local match) o Right of Way $387,500 ($387,500 local match) • Project description o Add dedicated eastbound and westbound left turn lanes so turning movements are concurrent, install new traffic signal system, widen sidewalk with planter strips at select locations, add ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps, up -grade City utilities, add street lighting and extend bike lanes thru intersection for south bound/eastbound movements. Preliminary Design tasks completed so far o Survey, Determination of environmental documentation, Lighting Analysis, Stormwater Requirements, and Underground Utility Conversion Requirements Packet Pg. 109 8.3.c 06/14/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 Discussion items o Intersection configuration: 2 options (as identified in grant / reduced footprint) o Conversion of overhead utilities to underground Photographs of lane configuration and signals for westbound, eastbound, southbound and northbound movements • Option 1 (identified in grant application) o Option Elements ■ Added southbound RT turn lane ■ Added eastbound dedicated thru lane ■ Added westbound LT turn lane ■ 4 ft planters and 7 ft on north, south and east legs ■ 7 ft sidewalks w/trees in grates on west leg ■ Extend dedicated bike lanes on north and west legs to intersection ■ Longer pedestrian crossings ■ Most impact to adjacent property owners ■ Biggest ROW acquisition need ■ Longest construction timeline Option 2 (modified from grant application/reduce footprint) o Option Elements ■ Added westbound LT turn lane ■ Removed 2nd eastbound lane on east leg for approx.. 400 ft ■ 4 ft planters and 7 ft sidewalks on north, south and east legs ■ 7 ft planters with trees in grates on west leg ■ Extended dedicated north and west leg, bike lanes to intersection ■ Added dedicated bike lanes on south leg ■ Requires bus stop relocation on east leg ■ Shorter pedestrian crossings — north, west and east legs ■ Lower impact to adjacent property owners — significantly reduces impacts to SW, NW and NE corners, slightly higher impact to SE corner ■ Lower ROW acquisition needs ■ Shorter construction timeline Packet Pg. 110 8.3.c 06/14/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4 Conversion of overhead utilities to underground (possible improvements in grant application) o Removal of 8 utility poles (excluding poles holding high tension lines along 220th St. SW that will remain) ■ 1 on west leg ■ 1 pole on SE and SW corners ■ 4 poles on north leg ■ 2 poles on east leg o Total cost of this addition: $1.8 Million (same cost for both options) Conclusion o Staff recommends Option 2 over Option 1: ■ Total project cost is less ($1.9M less) ■ Similar improvement to level of service ■ Pedestrian crosswalk distance is less ■ Right of way acquisition cost and property impacts are less ■ Reduced area for new impervious surfaces Questions and discussion followed regarding the grant for design and ROW, undergrounding utilities, source of matching funds, capacity added in option 2, preference for option 2, next steps with the grant to change grant from option 1 to option 2, including utility undergrounding as an option with the goal of securing additional grant funding, high tension lines that will remain, describing to full council the efficiencies discovered in the analysis that changed the recommendation from option 1 to option 2, and a supplement to the design contract that will be required for option 2. Mr. English described the process for changing the grant from option 1 to option 2. The PSPP committee expressed support for staff's recommendation. Action: Presentation to full council June 21 7. Presentation of Local Agency Consultant Agreement with Transpo for the SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th St SW to 226th St SW Mr. English relayed Mr. Hauss secured a federal grant for design of an adaptive signal control system for 5 traffic signals on SR-104 from 2361" to 226t". An adaptive system allows for coordination between the five signals to improve traffic flow which reduces vehicle emissions. The timing of signals will adjust based on real time data collectors that count vehicles and provide more green time to movements with higher volume such during traffic from ferry unloading. An RFQ was issued, three firms responded, and the selection committee chose Transpo. The preliminary scope of work covers eight task items related to design plans to implement the system. The goal is to get the design far enough to apply for a grant for construction. He was confident this project would receive grant funding as signal improvements Packet Pg. 111 8.3.c 06/14/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 5 projects that improve coordination and signal timing score well. A brief discussion followed regarding the local match. Action: Consent Agenda 8. Presentation of Construction Contract for the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Project Mr. English explained Seaview phase 2 is part of improvements to the upper portion of Perrinville Creek basin to address stormwater flows. The project was advertised June 8th and bids are due June 28th. If bids are opened June 28' and there is not a large budget impact, the bid award could be on the July 51 or 19th council agenda. This is on the agenda tonight as there is no public works staff available for the July 12th PPW committee meeting. Questions and discussion followed regarding whether to put the bid award on the Consent Agenda, no impact to Seaview park, and this project assisting with reducing peak runoff to Perrinville Creek. Action: Full council 9. Presentation of Professional Service Agreement for Design Services for the Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades Mr. English explained the Yost reservoir was built in 1973 and the Seaview reservoir in 1976; both are 1.5 million gallons and improvements and/or maintenance are needed on both. An assessment of the Yost reservoir found significant issues with leakage and structural issues with the roof and walls. An assessment of Seaview found minimal leakage; the structural assessment is ongoing. This agreement will take the design to 30% for both structures; staff will return with a supplement agreement for final design for both. The contract in the packet is $253,941 which includes a $30,000 management reserve. All project costs will be funded by the 421 Water Utility Fund. Questions and discussion followed regarding use of reservoirs to store water, impacts to the sport court on top of Yost reservoir, and how the Yost tank is accessed. Action: Consent Agenda 10. Select Homes 7918 203rd St SW 10-foot Right -of -Way Dedication Mr. English explained this is a right of way dedication for a 2-lot subdivision on 2031 street. The Not subdivision is currently under review and in accordance with the development code, the official street map requires a 10-foot street dedication. Discussion followed regarding a street map amendment to the west where right-of-way was vacated, other parcels on 203rd that have had a 10-foot street dedication, and whether more trees could be saved if more flexibility was provided on house location. Action: Consent Agenda 11. Presentation to Update Edmonds City Code Chapter 3.36 to Include Impact Fee Waivers for Early Learning Facilities Mr. English explained RCW 82.02.060 was amended last July to allow impact fee exemptions for early learning facilities (facilities providing regularly scheduled care for a group of children 1 month through 12 years of age for periods of less than 24 hours). The RCW provides several options; staff is proposing Packet Pg. 112 8.3.c 06/14/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 6 a 80% exemption for early learning facilities. The exemption would be conditioned on at least 25% of the children using the facility quality for state subsidized child care, and if the property were converted to a use other than an early learning facility, impact fees would be required to be paid. If the early learning facility did not meet the 25% requirement at any time, the full impact fee would be required. A covenant would be recorded documenting those requirements. A search of the past five years found two early learning facilities paid transportation impact fees, one paid $4,000 and the other paid $96,000. This option aligns with the City's existing 80% exemption for low income housing. Mr. Taraday added the RCW provides several options to make it easier to establish new early learning facility. The covenant tool allows recording a covenant to exempt up to all the impact fee, the no covenant model which would allow exempting up to 80%, and the replacement funds model (not supported by the engineering department) which replaces the impact fee with payment from the general fund to make up lost impact fee dollars. Questions and discussion followed regarding other cities with the same exemption for early learning facilities, how the 25% threshold is monitored/audited, providing incentive for early learning facilities providing state subsidized child care, applicability of impact fees on change of use of existing building, limited effect on impact fees collection, whether a public hearing is required, and priority of this item. Action: Full council 12. Public Works CIP-CFP Review Councilmember Tibbott advised he and Councilmember K. Johnson will meet to discuss the information provided and schedule further committee review. Councilmember Buckshnis offered to participate. Committee members expressed their appreciation for the spreadsheet and photographs. Action: Schedule future review For Council President Olson, Mr. English advised the overlay project on 76th is from 196th to Olympic View Drive. Council President Olson asked about traffic calming due to speeding on 761h north of OVD. Mr. English advised he forwarded an email from Council President Olson regarding this issue to Mr. Hauss and traffic counts are being conducted. He will follow-up with him tomorrow. Discussion followed regarding the possibility that it is the neighbors who are speeding and whether a radar feedback sign would slow traffic. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:13 p.m. Packet Pg. 113 8.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 14, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E061422 Special Packet Pg. 114 8.4.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES June 14, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Vivian Olson, Mayor Pro Tern Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tern Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Mike Nelson, Mayor 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis in the City Council Conference Room and virtually. City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Mayor Nelson. 2. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE CITIZENS' COMMENTS ON INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE Senior Planner Mike Clugston thanked the council for scheduling a public hearing tonight. The intent is to have a hearing before the 60 days expires on the interim ordinance for BD2 design standards. The adopting resolution originally scheduled the hearing on May 19, 2022. That date was missed, but by statue the City has 60 days from the date of adoption which was April 21, 2022 so this hearing meets that deadline. The purpose of tonight's public hearing is to gather public input about the proposed standards. Following the hearing, council can determine whether to keep the standards and send them to the planning board and finalize them over the next two months or repeal the standards, knowing some other work has been done in the BD2 zone recently. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis opened the public hearing and described the procedures for in - person public comments. Greg Brewer, Edmonds, commended the council for taking steps to protect the BD2 mixed -use commercial zone. Moving the street frontage line will go a long way toward protecting the small, vulnerable area. The BD2 zone was never intended to be 100% residential and he urge the council to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 14, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 115 8.4.a protect all of it including outside the street frontage line. Design standards are a good tool for great development, the kind of development that blends well with surrounding structures and functions well within the existing infrastructure. However, the standards brought forward by the planning department are not clear or comprehensive. Guidelines need to be spelled out so citizens, developers, planner, building officials and councilmembers are all on the same page. The less subjectivity to the standards the better for all. Four areas of concern need to be addressed: public amenity spaces, building setback and step -backs, modulation, and parking. First, public amenity spaces need clarification; stacking balconies over ground floor public amenity space is like getting credit for the same space twice. Does any part of the amenity space have a percentage of space clear to the sky? Second, setbacks on the ground floor for 100% residential are important which is why all other multifamily zones have ample setbacks except for the mistake project on Edmonds Street & 3rd where there are no setbacks or off-street parking. Buildings should also step back as they rise from the ground floor; even a few feet makes a huge difference. Setbacks and step -backs facilitate pedestrian traffic and allow light and air around these large buildings and both need concrete dimensions associated with them. Third, modulation is key to avoiding a box; any building that has a square roofline the same width and depth as its base should be banned. For lots combined on a slope as on Main & 6t'', modulation of rooftops would make a more attractive appearance and allow for more light and air to adjacent buildings. This is crucial for the health and quality of life for the neighbors. Kathy Brewer, Edmonds, continued Greg Brewer's comments. Furthermore, remember 25 + 5. While the extra 5 feet was granted for modulation and varied roof structure, now there is 30 + 5 for an architectural feature, equipment or elevator structure. This is being used to enable a third floor with a sunken ground floor and results in creeping heights. Taller buildings are being built that overshadow existing buildings, threatening the harmony and small scale of the quaint downtown core. Finally and most importantly, parking will be problematic. Just as 100% residential should mirror the setback standards for multifamily, so should the parking standards. She reference the memorandum from Otak dated May 19, 2022; Mukilteo and Snohomish parking standards require substantially more parking than Edmonds, yet Edmonds is more densely populated than either of those two cities. Edmonds lacks parking and needs to upgrade the number of parking spaces per unit. The 9-unit mistake project on Edmonds Street & 3' has tenant parking fanned out on adjacent streets. Imagine what the two proposed 24-unit apartment buildings on Main Street and Dayton Street would do to the already tight parking. There is a line of vehicles parking well up Main and spilling onto residential side streets daily and into the evening. Where will all the apartment tenants park? Main and Dayton Streets, downtown's main thoroughfares, will be jammed with traffic and parked vehicles. Ms. Brewer continued, this will compound the problem that Dayton residents already have with traffic and pedestrian safety. Getting in and out of downtown with all the traffic and drivers trying to find parking will be a headache and the parking sprawl will be unsightly at the gateway of the historical, charming downtown and should not be allowed. It is imperative that all proposed projects require adequate parking from now on. In conclusion, these design standards are not ready to be passed. There need to be clearly defined public amenity spaces, concrete dimensions for setbacks and step -backs, modulation requirements and an increased number of parking spaces per unit before proceeding. The integrity and charm of the downtown should not be sacrificed for the will of a developer and the ease of the planners. Allowing 100% residential into the tiny BD2 mixed use commercial zone and doing it without clear and comprehensive design standards is a big mistake. Send the planners back to the drawing board to address these issues, not rush this through and ensure what is built is good for the downtown, businesses, citizens and visitors. She referred to an article in My Edmonds News on June 13t'', Meet the New Business, where the owner stated she was thrilled to find a storefront space in downtown Edmonds. Her new business is located on 3' Avenue North in the BD2 zone, evidence that people want and need commercial space in the downtown business district. The BD2 zone needs to be protected and preserved, the demand will only grow as Edmonds grows. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 14, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 116 8.4.a Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, said the downtown corridor has been very special to her since opening her business there in 1980. They worked very hard to have commercial on the first floor and residences above. Although she wanted residential above commercial, she was opposed to this 24-unit apartment building with no commercial. She lived in the 4-unit townhouses in that alley for a time; that alley is very dangerous and that amount of traffic will create a serious situation. She thanked the council for holding this public hearing and expressed her interest in retaining the charm in downtown Edmonds. Lynda Fireman, Edmonds, commented this was supposed to be a public meeting in front of the council and there is not even a sign on the locked door and now citizens find themselves in city hall on Zoom. She had intended to thank the city council for asking questions to clarify the zoning of the designated street fronts and design standards and at no time has she seen anything that was unprofessional, discriminatory, harassing, inappropriate or bullying. It is the council's job to probe to find answers before making decisions. It is staffs job to answer those questions and explain their position and reasoning. Communication is key in any office, whether public or private. Most importantly, it is the job of the mayor to be clear what the agenda is because staff follows his lead. This agenda does not seem to be public or council knowledge. She was angry; whenever this development is brought up, there is only 30 minutes for discussion which she found disrespectful. She questioned whether that represented a public forum in Edmonds. She thought a public forum would include questions and answers. She questioned when the public would be given the time they deserved; this is not a project without impacts, it is real life in Edmonds and there is human cost to what is happening. Some of her neighbors may think this won't affect them or they are afraid to speak up; she is not. The general public is only looking at the inappropriate size and design seen from Main Street and likely don't know what is happening. These additional design standards are very small wins when it comes to the big picture. It does not address the impact of those who live on the square block or the other surrounding 15 parcels waiting to be developed. Ms. Fireman continued, it is encroaching and invasive and will cause loss of privacy, views, safety, livability and enjoyment of the neighbors' homes. Except for these three lots, the zoning is residential, RM-1.5. These two lots have a 10-foot drop from Main Street to the alley which means there will be a 4- story flat wall very close to her building. She has asked for pictures like were provided on the front of the building, but still hasn't received them. The fear factor is being used to push the development through. Edmonds is s small town with small town values, not Seattle or Ballard. She recalled comments from people who spoke about moving to Edmonds to get away from the density. The application said structures on adjacent parcels do not support intensity of development under the current zoning and comprehensive plan and are anticipated to eventually be replaced with higher density development. The proposed project is seen as a guide for future redevelopment allowed and encouraged by comprehensive plan. It also said it was market value. She questioned what is being done and what happens now. The one page of additional design standards doesn't say much and can have different interpretations. If this is passed, will the developer and other parcels quickly have applications into the planning department before the zoning and comprehensive plan can be redone? She was very disappointed to say the least in this whole process. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, referred to Chapter 16.43, definitions and requirements of the five distinct BD zones, and section 16.43.030, site development standards section B.8 states, "Within the BD4 zone, there are two options for developing the ground floor of a building. One option is to develop the ground floor with commercial space, meeting the same requirements detailed for the BD2 and BD3 zones in subsection (B)(7) of this section. As a second option, if more residential space is provided so that the ground floor does not meet the commercial use requirements described in subsection (B)(7) of this section, then the building setbacks listed for the RM-1.5 zone shall apply. In the case where RM-1.5 setbacks are required, the required street setback shall be landscaped and no fence or wall in the setback shall be over four feet in height above sidewalk grade unless it is at least 50 percent open, such as in a lattice pattern." She emphasized BD4 has the ground floor exception to be entirely residential, therefore if Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 14, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 117 8.4.a the BD2 zone is being interpreted to have the same two options as BD4, the same language should be included as a requirement which will allow BD2 to match the definition as a second option for development of the ground floor as BD4. The Highway 99 subarea plan is fantastic, not mentioned enough and was a very thought-out and thorough process that took years to finalize. Even that plan has a very critical concern noted in the design elements, not allowing a flat, unmodulated wall next to single family or less dense RM-1.5 zone or street. Dr. Dotsch continued, an alley is considered a street as was learned from the streateries and reimagining streets conversations. It states, "The current design critical seek to ensure buildings do not display, bank, unattractive walls to the abutting streets or residential properties, walls or portions of walls abutting streets or visible from residentially zoned properties and suggests a variety of architectural treatments to mitigate impact." It also states, "The comprehensive plan includes recommendations that should be considered when developing uses adjacent to single family areas where intense development adjoins residential areas. Site design including buffers and landscaping and building design should be used to minimize adverse impacts on residentially zoned properties." The recommendation was to establish step - back and setback standards for multifamily buildings adjacent to single family zoning including RM-1.5. She requested those be included in these standards as the Highway 99 subarea plan has great ideas that could be used in the downtown as well. Alleys are streets so a zero lot line, blank, unmodulated wall, just as in the Highway 99 subarea plan should also not be allowed in the downtown BD subarea design standards. There has never been a picture provided of a blank wall on that alley. There is no rush; she requested the council slow down and include photos of what these new design standards will look like. She also requested every adjacent property owner within the usual distance of the BD2 subarea be notified that these setbacks and design standards have been altered and allow them to provide comment in the future. Council Pro Tem Buckshnis described the procedures for virtual public comments. There were no virtual public comments. Council Pro Tem Buckshnis closed the public hearing and remanded the matter to council. Councilmember K. Johnson suggested bringing this back for discussion at a future date. There have been good public comments as well as written comments and the council deserves an opportunity to review them before taking action. City Attorney Jeff Taraday advised the council is required to adopt findings based on the hearing at the meeting following the hearing. The adoption of findings will come to council next week although it could be on the Consent Agenda. As the council's agendas have been very full recently, he was unable to say how much time would be devoted to that item. Mayor Pro Tem Olson asked if staff could provide the information on the item mentioned by Michelle Dotsch regarding the Highway 99 subarea plan regarding walls facing streets by email in the next couple days. Mr. Clugston answered yes. He explained what is being considered tonight is just the interim design standards that the council already adopted. The question is whether to continue those for the next four months while the planning board and city council take another look at the standards or allow the interim standards to expire and have no standards while work is done on the design standards. The interim design standards were developed fairly quickly, but the architectural design board (ADB) and the planning board liked them and the council adopted them. These standards could be retained for now, knowing the process will continue at the planning board and council to make some tweaks if necessary in response to issues that have been raised. The interim standards are valid for six months from adoption so consideration by the planning board and council needs to be completed in the next four months. Mayor Pro Tem Olson commented if council was interested in including the language from the Highway 99 subarea plan, it could not be included as part of the interim design standards; the choice was to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 14, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 118 continue with the interim standards or abandon them completely and not have any design standards for multifamily in the BD2 zone. Mr. Clugston answered yes. Councilmember Paine asked if the interim design standards included the analysis done by Kernen Lien regarding the street frontage for the B132 zone. She observed staff was nodding. She asked the status of multifamily design standards, relaying her understanding they had been reviewed by the ADB and should be at the planning board soon. She anticipated the multifamily design standards could help inform this discussion. Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin answered this has been a complex conversation so it is natural there are both active development projects that people are opposed to in addition to the designated street front conversation which was more of a land use conversation regarding permitted uses within the B132 zone as well as the interim design standards. She acknowledged it was confusing, but there are three separate things. The interim design standards are intrinsically linked with the multifamily design standards, however, the multifamily design standards will not get into land uses/permitted uses. Since there is so much interest in this from council, staff has considered whether it is more of a comprehensive plan issue related to the length of the designated street front throughout the downtown and taking a more comprehensive view of the BD zoned properties in conjunction with the vision of the comprehensive plan. The 2022 multifamily design standards are moving forward. Mr. Clugston explained the focus now is on these interim standards. The City has until October to finalize them; it will take time to go through the planning board and council process. Once that is completed, the multifamily design standards will go through the planning board, ADB and council. The interim design standards will inform that larger project, but the interim standards need to be completed first. 3. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 7:31 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 14, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 119 8.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of claim checks. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of re -issued claim check #252722 dated June 2, 2022 for $672.67, claim checks #252723 through #252840 dated June 9, 2022 for $547,813.48 and claim checks #252841 though #252936 dated June 16, 2022 for $390,010.43 (re -issued check #252921$333.51). Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: canon reissue 06-02-22 claims 06-09-22 claims 06-16-22 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 06-16-22 Packet Pg. 120 8.5.a vchlist 06/02/2022 11:21:18AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252722 6/2/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 28542106 MAY 2022 - EDMONDS PD 5/22 - CONTRACT - FAXBOARD ui 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.0, U 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 3.7f U 28542111 MAY 2022 - EDMONDS PD 5/22 - CONTRACT 3AP01257 @ 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 175.9E p 5/22 - CONTRACT - 3AP01253 Ta 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 175.9E p 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.9E Q 28542117 MAY 2022 - EDMONDS PD 5/22 - CONTRACT - 38C0l 511 N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 191.7E c 10.5% Sales Tax w 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 20.1; m 28542124 COUNCIL COPIER MONTHLY LEAS[ N Council Copier monthly lease for w 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 29.0E L 10.5% Sales Tax c 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 3.0E Total: 672.61, u r c Bank total : 672.6, t Total vouchers : 672.61 R a Page: 1 Packet Pg. 121 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252723 6/9/2022 078925 425 MAGAZINE 2022-37056 TOURISM PROMOTION ADS - JUNE TOURISM PROMOTION ADS - JUNE 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 Total 252724 6/9/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC INV-2-18554 EDMONDS PD - HATCHETT EXTERNAL CARRIER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 SAFARILAND ID PANEL 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 HEAT PRESS EDMONDS PD 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2 NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2 VELCRO - FOR NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INV-2-18690 EDMONDS PD - J.PECK NAVY CARDIGAN 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 ZIP UP SWEATSHIRT - NAVY 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 INV-2-18826 EDMONDS PD - NGUYEN BAYLY UNIFORM HAT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BIANCHI DUTY BELT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BIANCHI INNER BELT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 8.5.b Page: 1 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 122 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252724 6/9/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) BELT KEEPERS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 17.2,1 10.1 % Sales Tax -71 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 22.3� u) INV-2-18838 EDMONDS PD - BURKLANE FIRST TAC POLO - S/S 3 m 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 128.9; E EMBROIDERY- 3 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 _M 24.0( PATCH INSTALLL - 3 0 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 12.0( > FIRST TAC POLO - US - 1 0 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 47.9� a EMBROIDERY- 1 Q 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 8.0( N PATCH INSTALL N 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 4.0( c 10.1 % Sales Tax c 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 22.7' INV-2-18839 EDMONDS PD - KERN E FIRST TAC POLO - S/S 3 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 128.9, EMBROIDERY- 3 aoi 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 24.0( E PATCH INSTALL - 3 U �a 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 12.0( Q FIRST TAC POLO US - 1 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 47.9E EMBROIDERY - 1 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 8.0( PATCH INSTALL - 1 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 4.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 22.7' Page: 2 Packet Pg. 123 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252724 6/9/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) INV-2-18840 EDMONDS PD - MORRISON FIRST TAC POLOS - 4 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 171.9( EMBROIDERY- 4 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 32.0( PATCH INSTALL - 4 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 16.0( E 10.1 % Sales Tax _M 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 22.2, INV-2-18841 EDMONDS PD - SCHEELE o FIRST TAC POLO - L/S - 1 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 47.9� o EMBROIDERY- 1 Q- a 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 8.0( Q PATCH INSTALL N 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 4.0( N 10.1 % Sales Tax o 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 6.0E c INV-2-18842 EDMONDS PD - PHONXAYLINKHAN N FIRST TAC POLO- L/S - 1 E 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 47.9� T PATCH INSTALL 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 4.0( BOSTON BELT E t 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 23.3E @ V2 TAC PANTS - 3 r Q 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 194.9, HEMMING - PANTS 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 24.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 30.5' EMBROIDERY- 1 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 8.0( Total : 1,828.6! Page: 3 Packet Pg. 124 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252725 6/9/2022 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 57461 MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 94.0( 10.5% Sales Tax -71 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 9.8, Total: 103.8, 252726 6/9/2022 070963 ACTION FLAG CO 34033 FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FLAGS t U FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FLAGS E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 817.4( Z Freight o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 38.2£ R Total: 855.6f o L 252727 6/9/2022 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL 145478145 ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII Q- Q ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 30.0� N ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I c 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 30.Of ca 145478146 ALARM MONITORING - FS #16 y ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST, E 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 34.2( T 145478147 ALARM MONITORING - FS #17 ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST c 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 70.9E E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 7.4.E° 145478148 ALARM MONITORING - MUSEUM r Q ALARM MONITORING FOR museum 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 133.7.E 145478149 ALARM MONITORING - WWTP ALARM MONITORING FOR wwtp, 2C 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 55.3E 145478150 ALARM MONITORING - PUBLIC SAF ALARM MONITORING FOR city hall, 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 117.1 , Page: 4 Packet Pg. 125 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252727 6/9/2022 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL (Continued) 145478151 FIRE INSPECTION - F.S. #17, MUSE fire inspection, f.s. #17, 275 6th Ave N 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 55.4, .. Fire Inspection, Museum 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 35.0, um Fire Inspection - Public Safety 250 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 153.31 E 145701643 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 140.8' O 145701644 FIRE INSPECTION - CITY HALL 'R ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12 0 L 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 92.5, a Total: 956.2( Q 252728 6/9/2022 078776 AKRAMOFF LLC 20020 PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATION ccm PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATION c 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 2,038.0( co Total: 2,038.0( y E 252729 6/9/2022 078938 ALLOY ARTS LLC PA MAINTENANCE EAC AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES: ca EAC AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES: 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 2157.81 c Total : 2:157.81 t 252730 6/9/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC 052522009 WWTP: ACCT: COEWASTE: 5/25/22 @ Acct COEWaste:- Q 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 21.7E 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 2.2£ 060122035 FINANCE DEPT WATER Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 56.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 5.9' Page: 5 Packet Pg. 126 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252730 6/9/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC (Continued) 060122036 PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 37.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 3.8£ Total: 127.3° 252731 6/9/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6560011215 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS E FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9' o 10.5% Sales Tax R 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9< p 6560013037 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Q. PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE o' a 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6' .. PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE N 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' c PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE W 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0 6.1' N PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' T PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' y PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ U 10.5% Sales Tax r 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3- a 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 6 Packet Pg. 127 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 7 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252731 6/9/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� .. 6560013042 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� FLEET DIVISION MATS E 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1('� 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9E o 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 2.0' o 6560014768 WWTP: 6/1/22 UNIFORMSJOWELS Q- Mats/Towels $52.58 + $5.53 tax @ 1 a Q 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58.1' N Rentals & Prep Charges $46.13 + $4. N 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 50.9E o 6560014773 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE c PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 55.5( . 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.8' 6560014776 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9" u 10.5% Sales Tax r 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9< Q 6560016447 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE: PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE: 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE: 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 128 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252731 6/9/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' ui PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ u 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3" 'ca 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, O 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6, o 10.5% Sales Tax a 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� o 6560016451 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS E 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� FLEET DIVISION MATS a 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 c 19.1( 10.5% Sales Tax E 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9£ @ 10.5% Sales Tax Q 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 2.0 Total : 365.8° 252732 6/9/2022 078763 ARTIFACT 052422 CIVIC PARK: AGREEMENT FOR AR - CIVIC PARK: AGREEMENT FOR AR- 117.200.64.575.50.41.00 4,000.0( Total : 4,000.0( 252733 6/9/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 124102 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS Page: 8 Packet Pg. 129 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252733 6/9/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) UB Outsourcing area Printing 2910 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 2910 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 2910 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 2910 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 2910 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.25% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Tota I : 252734 6/9/2022 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 69635 INTERPRETER 2A0336380 INTERPRETER 2A0336380 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 69680 INTERPRETER 2A0185928 INTERPRETER 2A0185928 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 Tota I : 252735 6/9/2022 012005 BENDIKSEN & BALL POLYGRAPH EDMONDS#1 5/20 - EDMONDS PD 5/20 PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAI 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 EDMONDS#2 5/28 - EDMONDS PD 5/28 PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAI 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 EDMONDS#3 5/28- EDMONDS PD 5/28 PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAI 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 8.5.b Page: 9 Page: 9 Packet Pg. 130 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252735 6/9/2022 012005 BENDIKSEN & BALL POLYGRAPH 252736 6/9/2022 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 252737 6/9/2022 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 10 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) EDMONDS#4 5/28 - EDMONDS PD 5/28 PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAI 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 300.0( .. EDMONDS#5 6/5/2022 POLYGRAPHYS - EDMONC 6/5/22 - 2 PRE EMPLOYEMENT POL 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 600.0( Total : 1,800.0( E 0015994 WWTP: 2/19-5/20/22 PROF SERVICI 2/19-5/20/22 PROF SERVICES o 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 1,177.0( Total: 1,177.0( o L 639069 E21 JA.BLU EPRINTS Q- Q E21JA.BLUEPRINTS 421.000.74.594.34.41.00 410.0E N E21GA.BLUEPRINTS CD 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 0 410.0E E21 FD.BLUEPRINTS o 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 N 410.0� E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.594.34.41.00 43.0( 10.5% Sales Tax c 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 43.0E E 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 43.0E° 639118 E22CA BLUEPRINTS r Q E22CA BLUEPRINTS 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 93.8� E22CA BLUEPRINTS 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 108.9" E22CA BLUEPRINTS 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 104.91 10.5% Sales Tax 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 9.8( Page: 10 Packet Pg. 131 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 11 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252737 6/9/2022 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 11.4z 10.5% Sales Tax 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 11.0" Tota I : 1,699.41 252738 6/9/2022 078922 BJOLSTAD, BRIANNA MAY MILEAGE MAY RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT IN MAY RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT 001.000.64.571.23.43.00 56.4.E Total : 56.4; 252739 6/9/2022 065565 BUD CLARY FORD HYUNDAI 3NS640 E194FM - 2022 FORD E-TRANSIT 3E E194FM - 2022 FORD E-TRANSIT 3E 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 58,767.1( Total : 58,767.1( 252740 6/9/2022 078083 BUYCE JR, RICHARD J 10690 TRAINING 10690 STRENGTH & ENDURANCE 10690 STRENGTH & ENDURANCE 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 36.0( Tota I : 36.0( 252741 6/9/2022 075280 BYRUM, RICHARD A PSA UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE: 5/3-5/1� 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 370.0( Tota I : 370.0( 252742 6/9/2022 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 5835833 ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 392.3E 5836781 ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT E ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT E 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 564.6, 5837100 ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 426.6( 5837609 ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP Page: 11 Packet Pg. 132 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252742 6/9/2022 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 252743 252744 252745 6/9/2022 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 Tota I : 95454786 TRAFFIC - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA FOR RRF TRAFFIC - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA FOR RRF 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 95459020 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 95462028 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA & EXP JOI STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA & EXP JOI 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 95467923 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 Tota I : 6/9/2022 078866 CENTERPOINT LANGUAGE SERVICES 69487 INTERPRETER 2AO185928 INTERPRETER 2AO185928 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 Total 6/9/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY CG112530 PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 8.5.b Page: 12 Amoun 426.5E 1,810.11 N m t 458.7( U M 46.3z Z 4- 0 R 267.5E p L 0. 27.0, Q N N 395.0, c W 0 39.9- y E 267.5E a c m 27.0, E 1,529.1 j U M r Q 130.0( 130.0( 309.6( Page: 12 Packet Pg. 133 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252745 6/9/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 32.5( LY318319 WATER - CARBON DIOXIDE & HAZE WATER - CARBON DIOXIDE & HAZE 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 57.4E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.0z RN05220997 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL E YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL M 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 63.0( 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 6.6, Total: 475.2, o Q. 252746 6/9/2022 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 122003171 WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS a WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS .. 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,069.2( N Total : 1,069.2( c 252747 6/9/2022 076247 COLLEY, CASEY MAY MILEAGE MAY RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT MAY RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT IN E E 001.000.64.571.23.43.00 48.5( .� Total: 48.5E a: 252748 6/9/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310300732547 PUBLIC WRKS - DIGITAL CABLE c Public Works - 7110 210th S SW t 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.3, M Public Works - 7110 210th S SW Q 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 11.1 E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 11.1 E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 11.1.E Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 10.6 , 8498310301175175 CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S� Page: 13 Packet Pg. 134 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 14 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252748 6/9/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS (Continued) CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S� 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 143.9E 8498310301175191 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 143.9E 8498310301340308 UPTOWN CITY HALL - DIGITAL CAB Uptown City Hall - 23632 Highway 99 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 453.5( Total : 787.9( 252749 6/9/2022 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING MAY 2022 DRYCLEANING - EDMONDS PD MAY 2022 DRY CLEANING CHARGE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 251.4E Total: 251.4E 252750 6/9/2022 078948 DELAROSA, KALII April 2022 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Expense reimbursement - Net Protoo 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 59.4, Total: 59.4, 252751 6/9/2022 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2022050029 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098 Scan Services for May 2022 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 285.0( Total : 285.0( 252752 6/9/2022 078943 DIEL, ARNIE WAYNE PSA UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE: 5/3-5/1': 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 259.0( Total : 259.0( 252753 6/9/2022 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 22-4166 CITY COUNCIL MTG, SPECIAL CITY City Council Special Meeting 5/20/22 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 680.4( Tota I : 680.4( 252754 6/9/2022 075153 DOPPS, MARIA 69710 INTERPRETER XZ0329104 Page: 14 Packet Pg. 135 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 15 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252754 6/9/2022 075153 DOPPS, MARIA (Continued) INTERPRETER XZ0329104 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( 69774 INTERPRETER 9Z0915139 INTERPRETER 9Z0915139 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( Tota I : 260.0( 252755 6/9/2022 007253 DUNN LUMBER 8709824 PM: SUPPLIES ACCT E000027 PM SUPPLIES: LUMBER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 295.1( 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 30.3� Tota I : 325.41 252756 6/9/2022 074674 ECOLUBE RECOVERY LLC 3909060122 FLEET - REMOVAL OF USED OIL FLEET - REMOVAL OF USED OIL 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 195.0( Total : 195.0( 252757 6/9/2022 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 000125992 WWTP: PO 707 5-GAL. GEAR OIL PO 707 5-GAL. GEAR OIL 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 129.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 13.6, Total : 143.55 252758 6/9/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 3083 PM: TOTE, SCREWDRIVER, DRILL I PM: TOTE, SCREWDRIVER, DRILL l 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 39.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.1 3084 PM: W D40 PM: W D40 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.9� 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 15 Packet Pg. 136 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 16 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252758 6/9/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.7' 3085 PM: GAS CANS PM: GAS CANS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 71.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.5E 3087 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES E FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES M 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.9E 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.2,' 3090 F.A.C. - PARTS o F.A.C. - PARTS a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.9� Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.0E N 3097 WATER - SUPPLIES/ BRASS HOSE o WATER - SUPPLIES/ BRASS HOSE c 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 17.9E N 10.5% Sales Tax E 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.8� 5080 WWTP: PO 735 SPATULA & TONGS a ; PO 735 SPATULA & TONGS m 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 14.9E E 10.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 M 1.51 r Total : 213.11 Q 252759 6/9/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S' LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S' 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 61.2z 3-03575 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 506.3( 3-07525 LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE Page: 16 Packet Pg. 137 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252759 6/9/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 252760 252761 PO # Description/Account LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 3-07709 LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 3-09350 LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 3-09800 LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 3-29875 LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 Total 6/9/2022 075200 EDUARDO ZALDIBAR 69586 INTERPRETER 2A0267983 INTERPRETER 2A0267983 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 8570/2022 E20CE/SPANISH TRANSLATION E20CE/SPANISH TRANSLATION 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Total 6/9/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR220361 DEV SVCS - COPIER LEASE Dev Svcs Monthly Copier Contract- 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 AR220363 DEV SERVICES - COPIER LEASE Dev Svcs Contract overage charges 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 AR221277 COPY MACHINES MAR -MAY 22 8.5.b Page: 17 Amoun 61.2z N 56.3E t U E 0 61.2z 0 L 0. a 61.2z Q 927.2f N N rn 0 co 130.0( N E 50.0( 180.0( E t U ca 2.4' Q 0.2E 3.4E 0.3E Page: 17 Packet Pg. 138 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252761 6/9/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 252762 6/9/2022 076939 ESSENTRICALLY FIT LLC 252763 6/9/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD AR221435 AR221571 AR221619 10645 ESSENTRICS E D H 948419 EDH955404 8.5.b Page: 18 PO # Description/Account Amoun COPY MACHINES MAR-MAY22 001.000.23.512.51.45.00 153.2,' 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.51.45.00 16.0E U) MK5532 C165 CONTRACT CHARGE m B/W copier charges 5/1/22 - 5/31/22 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 15.1 ' E Color copier charges 5/1/22 - 5/31/22 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 523.11 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 56.5, > DEV SVCS MONTHLY COPIER LEA; o Contract overage charges for Q- 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 a 128.5� Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 13.5( N CANON 250 OVERAGE o bw overage May 2022 c 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 3.3E clr overage May 2022 E 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 28.6E 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 3.3E Total : 948.1: U 10645 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI fd r 10645 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI Q 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 99.0( Total : 99.0( P&R: INVITATION TO BID: YOST PAI P&R: INVITATION TO BID: YOST PAI 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 330.2� PLANNING - LEGAL NOTICE Publication of legal notice in Herald - Page: 18 Packet Pg. 139 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 19 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252763 6/9/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD (Continued) 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 70.5, EDH955511 CITY ORDINANCES 4262 & 4263 City Ordinances 4262 & 4263 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 34.4( Tota I : 435.1 f 252764 6/9/2022 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS NFalk May2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES -MILEAGE F Claim for Expenses (May 2022)- 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 21.1 F Total: 21.11 252765 6/9/2022 076533 FIELDING, LAUREN 2006849.009 REFUND: SCHEDULING CONFLICT REFUND: SCHEDULING CONFLICT 001.000.239.200 55.1( Total : 55.1( 252766 6/9/2022 075538 GAMEZ, OMAR 05232022 OXG CLAIM FOR EXPENSES MAY OXG CLAIM FOR EXPENSES MAY 001.000.23.523.30.43.00 669.3( Total : 669.3( 252767 6/9/2022 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA 10246 10242 10244 10246 10242 10244 QIGONG/TAI CF 10246 QIGONG INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 508.8( 10242 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 396.4� 10244 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 291.5( Total : 1,196.8( 252768 6/9/2022 075082 GOUDA INCORPORATED BID-RET-00898 BID/ED! UMBRELLA DEPOSIT BID/ED! UMBRELLA DEPOSIT 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 4,400.0( Total: 4,400.0( 252769 6/9/2022 012199 GRAINGER 9330721847 WWTP: PO 846 CHAIN HOIST Page: 19 Packet Pg. 140 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 20 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252769 6/9/2022 012199 GRAINGER (Continued) PO 846 CHAIN HOIST 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 217.0f 10.5% Sales Tax -71 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 22.7� u) Total: 239.8' 252770 6/9/2022 067615 GTS INTERIOR SUPPLY 40113285-00 PUBLIC SAFETY - ACCESS DOOR t U HANDLING CHARGE E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.1 � z 9.9% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.8.' R PUBLIC SAFETY - ACCESS DOOR p 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 L 79.2� 0- Total: 88.1 Q 252771 6/9/2022 078391 HARRIS, BRITTANY MAY 2022 NEW WORLD CONFERENCE PER 1 N N NEW WORLD CONFERENCE PER [ c 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 179.5( W Total: 179.5( N E 252772 6/9/2022 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 16070120 WATER - PARTS/ BALL VALVE & STI M WATER - PARTS/ BALL VALVE & STI 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 977.2� 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 102.6" 16070123 WATER INVENTORY - 2" ANGLE BA U WATER INVENTORY - 2" ANGLE BA Q 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 963.1 , 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 101.11 16103324 WATER PARTS/ INVENTORY WATER - PARTS/ QUICK JOINT COL 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 435.9E WATER INVENTORY - 2" QUICK JOI 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 420.8( Page: 20 Packet Pg. 141 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252772 6/9/2022 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 44.1 E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 45.7E 16103327 WATER INVENTORY - ANGLE BALL WATER INVENTORY - ANGLE BALL 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 833.1( 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 87.4 Total : 4,011.4; 252773 6/9/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0552791611 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 111.6E 0552793282 OLYMPIC BEACH HONEY BUCKET OLYMPIC BEACH HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 9,751.4( Total : 9,863.0E 252774 6/9/2022 071642 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 14495 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 5.25.22 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 5.25.22 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 814.5( Total: 814.5E 252775 6/9/2022 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE BID-0522ED BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER MAY BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER MAY 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 2,766.6� Total: 2,766.E , 252776 6/9/2022 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG BID-ED2022-05 BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY MAY 2022 BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY MAY 2022 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.0( Total : 600.0( 252777 6/9/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC U2216022989 WATER INVENTORY - RESETTER- Page: 21 Packet Pg. 142 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 22 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252777 6/9/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC (Continued) WATER INVENTORY - RESETTER- 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,606.2( 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 168.6E U2216025284 WATER INVENTORY - SETTER - WATER INVENTORY - SETTER- 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,862.2E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 195.5, Total : 3,832.E , 252778 6/9/2022 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 7027 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC Jun-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 590.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 61.9E Total: 651.9E 252779 6/9/2022 074367 JURASSIC PARLIAMENT 4715 PARLIAMENTARY TRAINING WORK May 20, 2022 videoconference trainin 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 1,900.0( Total: 1,900.0( 252780 6/9/2022 078250 KAUFER DMC LLC 2664 BUSINESS BOOSTER WEB HOSTIN BUSINESS BOOSTER WEB HOSTIN 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 300.0( Tota I : 300.0( 252781 6/9/2022 077229 KERN, KARLY MAY 2022 NEW WORLD CONFERENCE PER [ NEW WORLD CONFERENCE PER [ 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 179.5( Total : 179.5( 252782 6/9/2022 078239 KIM, YOUNGHEE 05192022 INTERPRETER lA0273074 INTERPRETER 1A0273074 - 5/19/22 Page: 22 Packet Pg. 143 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 23 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252782 6/9/2022 078239 KIM, YOUNGHEE (Continued) 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 380.4, Tota I : 380.4, 252783 6/9/2022 067568 KPG PSOMAS INC 1-9122 E7DC.SERVICES THRU 2.24.22 ui E7DC.SERVICES THRU 2.24.22 112.000.68.595.61.41.00 991.3( E7DC.SERVICES THRU 2.24.22 U 125.000.68.595.61.41.00 302.8E E7DC.SERVICES THRU 2.24.22 126.000.68.595.61.41.00 468.8, o E7DC.SERVICES THRU 2.24.22 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 0.8£ p 3-9322 E7DC/SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 Q. E7DC/SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 0' a 112.000.68.595.61.41.00 2,672.2< N E7DC/SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 c14 125.000.68.595.61.41.00 816.4- c E7DC/SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 co 126.000.68.595.61.41.00 0 1,263.8z y E7DC/SERVICES THRU 3.31.22 E 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 2.3£ T 4-3622 E7DC/SERVICES THRU 4.28.22 a: E7DC/SERVICES THRU 4.28.22 m 112.000.68.595.61.41.00 1,721.3, E E7DC/SERVICES THRU 4.28.22 U 125.000.68.595.61.41.00 525.9" r E7DC/SERVICES THRU 4.28.22 a 126.000.68.595.61.41.00 814.1 E7DC/SERVICES THRU 4.28.22 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 1.5, Total : 9,581.E , 252784 6/9/2022 078898 LANG, LIAM GYM MONITOR 5/3-5/31 PICKLEBALL GYM MONITO 5/3-5/31 PICKLEBALL GYM MONITO 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 225.0( Page: 23 Packet Pg. 144 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252784 6/9/2022 078898 078898 LANG, LIAM (Continued) Total : 225.0( 252785 6/9/2022 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING 47490425185 ACCT#2185-952778-727 CITY HALL Shredding services 5/25/22 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 25.0( Shredding services 5/25/22 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 25.0( 47495745185 SHREDDING MAY'22 SHREDDING MAY'22 001.000.23.512.51.49.00 17.2( Total: 67.2E 252786 6/9/2022 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 80500355153 UNIT 88 - INNER TIE ROD UNIT 88 - INNER TIE ROD 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 109.9� 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 11.5! Total : 121.5' 252787 6/9/2022 078935 LEVESQUE, LEROY PSA UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE: 5/3-5/1� 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 148.0( Total : 148.0( 252788 6/9/2022 074848 LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC 2022-1052 REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 334.0( 2022-1055 PLANNING DEPT - PROF SVCS Project: Edmonds Downtown Market ; 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 18,776.5( Total : 19,110.5( 252789 6/9/2022 076001 LUCIE R BERNHEIM, ATTY AT LAW 962 CONFLICT COUNSEL XZ0877363 CONFLICT COUNSEL XZ0877363 001.000.39.515.93.41.00 137.5( 963 CONFLICT COUNSEL XZ0877363 CONFLICT COUNSEL XZ0877363 Page: 24 Packet Pg. 145 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252789 6/9/2022 076001 LUCIE R BERNHEIM, ATTYAT LAW (Continued) 252790 6/9/2022 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 252791 6/9/2022 068529 MCINTYRE, BRIAN 02526 02570 03049 MAY 2022 252792 6/9/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 372368 372475 PO # Description/Account 001.000.39.515.93.41.00 Total : CS 22-8292 - EDMONDS PD TOW GREEN FORD - CS 22-8293 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 CS 22-9593 - EDMONDS PD TOW GRAY 4RUNNER- CS 22-9593 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 CS 22-8231 - EDMONDS PD TOW BLUE CHRYSLER- CS22-8231 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total CPS MINORS FOOD REIMBURSEMI FOOD REIMBURSEMENT FOR CPS 001.000.41.521.21.49.00 Total PM: STARTER GRIP, FILES, SPOOL PM: STARTER GRIP, FILES, SPOOL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 CEMETERY: GATORLINE CEMETERY: GATORLINE 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 8.5.b Page: 25 Page: 25 Packet Pg. 146 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 26 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252792 6/9/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC (Continued) 372880 CEMETERY: SPRING, COVER LINE CEMETERY: SPRING, COVER LINE 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 48.0E 10.5% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 5.0E Tota I : 172.2 252793 6/9/2022 075590 MOBILE GUARD INV00708776 VERIZON - MG CLOUD MT ANNUAL Verizon - MG Cloud MT Annual Servi( 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 14,087.2, Total: 14,087.21 252794 6/9/2022 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS 26718 PUBLIC SAFETY - REPAIRED FAILE PUBLIC SAFETY - REPAIRED FAILE 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 690.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 71.7( Total: 761.7E 252795 6/9/2022 078936 MORGISON, DUANE PSA UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE: 5/3-5/2 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 444.0( Total : 444.0( 252796 6/9/2022 078847 NEWNUM, BETSY 10668 YOGA 10668 YOGA INSTRUCTION 10668 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 38.7E Total: 38.71 252797 6/9/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER May, 2022 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANS Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 147.4( PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 2,767.1 , Building Code Fee Account Page: 26 Packet Pg. 147 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252797 6/9/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 252798 252799 6/9/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 PO # Description/Account 001.000.237.150 State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 Accessible Communities Acct 001.000.237.290 Multi -Model Transportation 001.000.237.300 Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 Total HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/ HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total 6/9/2022 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 46054 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL SUPPLIES: CHEMICAL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 46055 YOST POOL REPLASTER YOST PARK POOL REPLASTER 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 8.5.b Page: 27 Amoun 422.0( 5.7( N 792.9E t U 295.6E E 138.2, 0 5.5E > 0 L 5.5E a a 26.8� N N CD 32.6E c 4,639.8( o N E 25.2z c m E 148.2E U 173.5, r Q 742.2( 77.9< 65,400.0( Page: 27 Packet Pg. 148 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 28 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252799 6/9/2022 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 6,867.0( Total: 73,087.1: 252800 6/9/2022 026830 PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY 51050064 YOST - SUPPLIES N YOST - SUPPLIES t 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 71.5( U E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.5( Z Total: 79.0( o 252801 6/9/2022 075735 PACIFIC SECURITY 41507 SECURITY MAY 22 R 0 SECURITY MAY 22 Q. 001.000.23.512.51.41.02 3,876.6( Q Total : 3,816.6( " N 252802 6/9/2022 078895 PADILLA, TRACIE 05312022 TLP CLAIM FOR EXPENSES MAY 2', CD TLP CLAIM FOR EXPENSES MAY 2, c 001.000.23.523.30.43.00 W 72.0( Total: 72.0( 252803 6/9/2022 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT HPC051222 PLANNING - LEGAL NOTICE .2 Historical Preservation Committee 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 c 80.0( PB050522 PLANNING - PROF SVCS Preparation of Planning Board Minute @ 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 164.0( Q Tota I : 244.0( 252804 6/9/2022 078800 POPA & ASSOCIATES BID-5 BID/ED! COPYWRITING (DADS & GI BID/ED! COPYWRITING (DADS & GI 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.0( Total: 600.0( 252805 6/9/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( Page: 28 Packet Pg. 149 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252805 6/9/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 29 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,551.0( 200007876143 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 208.7- 200009595790 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 599.8E U E 200011439656 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 137.3E o 200016558856 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME �a CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME o L 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 430.5" a 200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / Q FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 521.7( N 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 c FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 co 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 354.5E 0 y 200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 E MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 f° 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 228.0E; 200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN m SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / E 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 103.6, U 200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; r PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH : Q 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 44.4, PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 168.8( PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 168.8( PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 168.8( PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; Page: 29 Packet Pg. 150 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252805 6/9/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 252806 6/9/2022 078283 REINTEGRATED MEDIA 252807 6/9/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 30 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 168.8( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 168.8( .. 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 247.2z Total: 5,271.0E E 439 A/V TECH SUPPORT FOR HYBRID ( U A/V tech support for hybrid council o 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 787.5( R Total: 787.5( o L 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE Q- Q FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 277.4z N 3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; CD PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; c m 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 42.8( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E E 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 162.6, .� PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 162.6, c PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 162.6, u PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 r 162.6, Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 162.6- 3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 268.9( 3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 72.6`. Page: 30 Packet Pg. 151 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 252807 6/9/2022 061540 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 (Continued) 252808 6/9/2022 068657 ROBERT HALF 60111546 252809 6/9/2022 065769 SADORUS, JEFFREY 252810 6/9/2022 074564 SCHEELE, DARCIE 252811 6/9/2022 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 252812 6/9/2022 070127 SHIER, JASON J 252813 6/9/2022 078950 SNIFFEN, ROD 60139141 Description/Account Total ; TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Accountii 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Grants 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 Total PSA UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE PSA SR SOFTBALL UMPIRE: 5/3-5/1� 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total MAY 2022 NEW WOLRD TRAINING PER DIEM NEW WORLD CONFERENCE PER [ 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Total 59469 REMOTE COMPUTER SUPPORT Remote computer support - 5/5/22, 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 Total MAY 2022 BOISE TRAINING PER DIEM - SHIEI BOISE TRAINING PER DIEM MAY 2( 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Total MAY 2022 WASPC CONFERENCE PER DIEM - SNIFFEN WASPC TRANING PER DI 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 8.5.b Page: 31 Amoun 1,474.81 571.2( ui m t 2,314.8( U 1,952.0( o 4,838.0( 0 Q. a 222.0( Q 222.0( N rn 0 W 0 179.5( 179.5( c m 1,560.0( t 1,560.0( UM r Q 243.7E 243.7E 177.2E Page: 31 Packet Pg. 152 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252813 6/9/2022 078950 078950 SNIFFEN, ROD 252814 6/9/2022 066754 SNO CO PUBLIC WORKS 252816 6/9/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 32 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 177.2; 1000593869 SNO COUNTY ASSISTANCE LOAN SNO COUNTY ASSISTANCE LOAN 422.000.72.591.31.78.00 29,527.8� ui SNO COUNTY ASSISTANCE LOAN 422.000.72.592.31.83.20 6,922.1 E Total: 36,450.W U 200124873 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W o 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 37.2� R 200202919 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV o LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV Q. 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 65.7' Q 200274959 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W N 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 22.2E CD 200348233 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W C TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W W c 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 44.4, E 200386456 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE M CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 78.0� 200422418 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( M 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 721.1 E 2 200468593 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / Q LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 262.4E 200493153 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 36.6( 200638609 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 226.7, Page: 32 Packet Pg. 153 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252816 6/9/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 33 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 200663953 ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 52.7- .. 200748606 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 24.4� 200865202 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE E LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 67.2( 200943348 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V o TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V R 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 53.9� o 201054327 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 I L a BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 I Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 46.5( N 201103561 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI N TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI c 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 37.2� c 201192226 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W y TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 23.7, T 201265980 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL a ; LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL m 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 141.9( E 201374964 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P U LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P r 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 20.3, Q 201532926 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 153.2E 201563434 TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 31.4- 201572898 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME Page: 33 Packet Pg. 154 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 34 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252816 6/9/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 39.5 201582152 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 34.3z 201594488 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 20.0' E 201610276 OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT R OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT 0 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 8.6' o 201611951 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W �a TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W o L 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 35.9E a 201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! Q DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! N 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 161.3, N 201703758 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( c PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( 6 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 0 30.4E N 201711785 STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15( E STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ f° 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 8.6 � 201751476 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW m TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 44.0� U 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � r TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � Q 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 20.0' 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 34.3� 202077194 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 525.5, 202087870 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl Page: 34 Packet Pg. 155 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252816 6/9/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 35 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 161.7( 202139655 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 28.2, 202289096 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 202289120 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME o 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 59.9� R 202356739 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W o TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W a 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 31.1' Q 202421582 LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI N N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 109.7' o 202499539 LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST c LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST y 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 500.4� . 202529186 STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ a ; 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 4,045.3E y 202529202 STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40( E STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40 U 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 113.1 E r 202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C Q STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 13,788.7, 202579488 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 387.9< 202579520 W WTP: 5/1-5/31 /22 ENERGY MGMI 5/1-5/31/22 ENERGYMANAGEMEI` 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 11.4' Page: 35 Packet Pg. 156 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252816 6/9/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 36 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 202807632 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 23.6- 204292213 CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 58.8" 204714893 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' E STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 6.2, 204714927 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 0 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 �a 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 162.3< o 204714935 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 Q- STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 Q 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 88.5" N 204714943 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 N STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 c 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 19.2� c 204714950 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 y STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 69.5, 220547582 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE a ; TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE m 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 45.8E E 220792758 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME U TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME r 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 75.0( Q 222398059 SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY 22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet - 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 69.2E 222818874 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A) Decorative Lighting 115 2nd Ave S / 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 23.4, 223189747 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 8326 196- PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 8326 196- Page: 36 Packet Pg. 157 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252816 6/9/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 252817 252818 252819 252820 6/9/2022 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 4743 6/9/2022 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER May 2022 6/9/2022 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE 22-0018 6/9/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 103584 103585 103586 103588 8.5.b Page: 37 PO # Description/Account Amoun 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 27.0' Total : 23,079.7E JUN-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA- ui JUN-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA- 001.000.39.528.00.41.50 76,390.8E JUN-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA- U 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 2,010.2E JUN-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPA- 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 2,010.2� o Total: 80,411.4: R Crime Victims Court Remittance 0 Q. Crime Victims Court Remittance °- a 001.000.237.140 Total : 62.9( N Q1-22 EMS BILLING, POSTAGE & R a) c 01-22 Ambulance billings, postage & c 001.000.39.522.70.41.00 16,784.1( E Total : 16,184.1 f '� CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 717.7z t WWTP: ACCT 103584 - X/2022 REC U �a ACCT 103584 - X/2022 RECYCLING r a 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 38.7E FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 704.5E SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 605.1 E CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N Page: 37 Packet Pg. 158 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252820 6/9/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 201159 W WTP: ACCT #201159 - 5/31 /22 GF ACCT #201159 - 5/31 /22 GARBAGE 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 Tota I : 252821 6/9/2022 076811 STANLEY, MARCUS APRIL 2022 DARC TRAINING PER DIEM - STANI DARC TRAINING PER DIEM - APRIL 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Tota I : 252822 6/9/2022 076054 STRUM, KRAIG MAY 2022 BOISE PER DIEM/REIMBURSEMEN BOISE PER DIEM MAY 2022 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 TIPS& INCIDENTAL & FUEL REIMBL 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Total 252823 6/9/2022 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 180038062-00 ROADWAY - SUPPLIES ROADWAY - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 180038063-00 FLEET MAINT - PARTS FLEET MAINT - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Total : 252824 6/9/2022 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 20898 CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITALADVE CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITAL ADVE 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 Total 8.5.b Page: 38 Page: 38 Packet Pg. 159 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252825 6/9/2022 078897 THE TRITON GROUP EHM 252826 6/9/2022 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 127 131 132 252827 6/9/2022 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 2050146 252828 6/9/2022 077738 VANIA H KIM HAAM 252829 6/9/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 05202022 PO # Description/Account SCRAM 1A0304039 SCRAM 1 A0304039 001.000.39.515.93.41.00 SCRAM 2AO200561 SCRAM 2AO200561 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 SCRAM 2AO200561 SCRAM 21 A0200561 001.000.39.515.93.41.00 Total ; DEV SVCS - COPIER LEASE Monthly lease for HP Pagewide LX40 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 Total INTERPRERTER 1 A0273074 - MAY INTERPRERTER 1 A0273074 - MAY 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 Total 9907267729 C/A 772540262-00001 Cradlepoint 1 - IT 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 8.5.b Page: 39 Amoun 360.0( N 200.0( t U E 270.0( 830.0( 0 �a 0 192.5( Q. a a 20.2' 212.71 N rn 0 W 0 N 117.0; E 117.0, c 120.6- E 354.7; u �a Q 978.0( 978.0( 100.0' Page: 39 Packet Pg. 160 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252829 6/9/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 252830 6/9/2022 078949 VOLCANIC BIKES Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 40 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.49.20 3.3' Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 3.3- Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 423.000.75.535.80.49.20 3.4( Trimble 1 - Storm U 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 10.0' E Lake Ballinger monitor 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 _M 31.4' Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te o 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 17.0E > Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te o 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 17.0( a Total : 185.5E Q 15320 EDMONDS PD BIKES N 6 VOLCANIC PATROL BIKES c 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 9,599.9z c 6 MTX EXPLORER RACKS y 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 359.9z .E 6 MTX TRUNKBAGS 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 629.7( a ; 6 NITERIDER LIGHTING SYSTEM m 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 2,399.9z E 6 DIGITAL PATROL TAILLIGHTS U 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 419.9z r 6 SIREN DUAL TONE Q 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 419.9z 6 POLICE WHITE TOP TUBE 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 60.0( Freight 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 600.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 1,521.3� Page: 40 Packet Pg. 161 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 41 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252830 6/9/2022 078949 078949 VOLCANIC BIKES (Continued) Total : 16,010.7< 252831 6/9/2022 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 201136324 LE RECORDS - EDMONDS PD - MC. LE RECORDS TRAINING - 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 300.0( Total : 300.0( 252832 6/9/2022 060359 WARDEN FLUID DYNAMICS 5793592-00 WWTP: PO 824 NORGREN FILTER PO 824 NORGREN FILTERS 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 994.2( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 37.81' 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 108.3 Total : 1,140.4E 252833 6/9/2022 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 122006868 EDM301 - EDMONDS PD CPL BACKGROUNDS MAY 2022 001.000.237.100 66.2E BACKGROUND CHECKS MAY 2022 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 68.5( Total : 134.7E 252834 6/9/2022 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 122-356 TREE REMOVAL - 20208 87TH AVE' TREE REMOVAL - 20208 87TH AVE' 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 2,800.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 294.0( Total: 3,094.0( 252835 6/9/2022 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 0059370-2588-9 WWTP: 5/2022 WASTE PICKUPS 5022 WASTE PICKUPS 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 91,383.6E Total: 91,383.6E 252836 6/9/2022 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 12793583 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Page: 41 Packet Pg. 162 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 42 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252836 6/9/2022 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.0E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.0E Tota I : 32.1( 252837 6/9/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 8186 BUSINESS CARDS FOR COUNCILIV Box of 250 new business cards for SL 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 56.5, 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 5.8£ Tota I : 62.4( 252838 6/9/2022 063008 WSDOT RE 41 JZ0186 L024 E20CE/SERVICES FOR MARCH 202 E20CE/SERVICES FOR MARCH 202 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 160.8z Total : 160.8z 252839 6/9/2022 078947 YI, GRACE YOON 05052022 INTERPRETER lA0273074 INTERPRETER lA0273074 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 1,000.0( 05192022 INTERPRETER lA0273074 INTERPRETER lA0273074 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 1,076.5E Total : 2,076.5E 252840 6/9/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 272.2( TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 272.2E 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 42.1 425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} Page: 42 Packet Pg. 163 vchlist 06/09/2022 12 : 30 : 57 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252840 6/9/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 117 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 117 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.b Page: 43 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 137.4� 425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRAI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 47.5E 425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 U 58.2' E 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P R CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A 0 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 137.4� o 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIALACCE 'R LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI o L 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.4E 0- Total: 993.91 Q Bank total : 547,813.41 N CD Total vouchers : 547,813.41 9w 0 N E V a+ Q Page: 43 Packet Pg. 164 8.5.c vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 : 59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252841 6/16/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun INV-2-18627 EDMONDS PD - BORST-SWAT SALOMON QUEST GTX BOOT 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 259.9,1 .. 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 26.2E 0 INV-2-18630 EDMONDS PD - HAT INVENTORY U RICHARDSON FLEX FIT CAP - 5 E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 87.5( _R 5- EDMONDS PD GOLD EMBROIDE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 40.0( O 10.1 % Sales Tax > 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 12.9( o INV-2-19137 EDMONDS PD - NGUYEN Q' a EMBROIDERY- POLO Q 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.0( N PATCH INSTALL N co 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 4.0( r SAM BOOME CLIP TIE c 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.9, BLAUER 6 POCKET PANTS E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 104.9� Z PANT ALTERATIONS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 20.0( BLAUER TROUSER PANTS t 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 114.9� @ PANT ALTERATIONS Q 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 20.0( BLAUER L/S CLASS A SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 94.9� BLAUER S/S SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 169.9E BLAUER L/S CLASS B SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 94.9� 3 - NAME TAPES Page: 1 Packet Pg. 165 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252841 6/16/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 252842 6/16/2022 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 252843 6/16/2022 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 252844 6/16/2022 078469 AGUIRRE, RAUL Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 5.11 RAIN PANT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 V2 TACTICAL PANTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BLAUER TRAFFIC VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 HEAT PRESS EDMONDS PD 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Total 58316 WWTP: 6/9/22 PEST CONTROL SEF 6/9/22 Pest Control Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58402 LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SERA LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SERA 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 Tota I : 622355 P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 Tota I : 69670 INTERPRETER 2A0336378 INTERPRETER 2A0336378 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 8.5.c Page: 2 Page: 2 Packet Pg. 166 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252844 6/16/2022 078469 078469 AGUIRRE, RAUL (Continued) 252845 6/16/2022 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 10979 252846 6/16/2022 074718 AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES INC 21947 21990 22116 22310 22378 8.5.c Page: 3 PO # Description/Account Amoun Total : 130.0( MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 164,140.8( ui Total: 164,140.8( m YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL t U YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 224.5( 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 23.31 R YOST POOL/SPA SUPPLIES: CHEM o YOST POOL/SPA SUPPLIES: CHEM Q. 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 3,058.3E Q 10.4% Sales Tax �- 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 318.01 N YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL co YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,670.0( N 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 173.6E .M YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,649.6, E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 346.4, YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,649.6' YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL YOST POOL & SPRAY PARK SUPPL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 228.1 E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 23.9E Total : 9,365.7; Page: 3 Packet Pg. 167 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252847 6/16/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 4 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 6560018168 WWTP: UNIFORMS,TOWELS+MATT Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 52.6£ Rentals & Prep Charges $47.02 + $4. 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 47.0, ui 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 5.5< U 10.5% Sales Tax E 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 4.9z 'R 6560018180 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS z FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS O 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9' > 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9( a 6560019929 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT Q FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS N 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� N FLEET DIVISION MATS T 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1( c 10.5% Sales Tax rn 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9£ •� 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 2.0' 6560019934 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6" u. PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Q 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Page: 4 Packet Pg. 168 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252847 6/16/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� Tota I : 207.9( 252848 6/16/2022 072576 ART ACCESS CORPORATION 20094 EAC: D'ELAINEAD EAC: D'ELAINE AD 117.100.64.573.20.41.40 39.0( Total : 39.0( 252849 6/16/2022 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 69671 INTERPRETER 2A0341815 INTERPRETER 2A0341815 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( 69811 INTERPRETER 2A0336381 INTERPRETER 2A0336381 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( Total : 260.0( 252850 6/16/2022 072455 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC 5289150 WWTP: PO 690 MOTOROLA FIRM" PO 690 MOTOROLA FIRMWARE UP 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 225.0( Cable 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 129.0( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 20.0( Page: 5 Packet Pg. 169 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252850 6/16/2022 072455 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 23.4( 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 15.5( Total: 412.9( 252851 6/16/2022 002300 BEAVER EQUIPMENT SPECALITY CO 22054i WWTP: PO 799 DURA-TANK GASKE PO 799 DURA-TANK GASKET 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 460.0( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 25.7.E 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 51.0( Total: 536.7E 252852 6/16/2022 012005 BENDIKSEN & BALL POLYGRAPH EDMONDS#6 6/9/22 POLYGRAPHS - EDMONDS F 1 PREEMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH 1 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 300.0( EDMONDS#7 6/12/22 POLYGRAPHS - EDMONDS 2 PREEMPOLYMENT POLYGRAPHS 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 600.0( Tota I : 900.0( 252853 6/16/2022 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC 639360 E20CE/BLUEPRINTS E20CE/BLUEPRINTS 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 5,477.9, 10.5% Sales Tax 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 575.1 E Total: 6,053.1( 252854 6/16/2022 078922 BJOLSTAD, BRIANNA 6/7/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 35.4E JUNE MILEAGE JUNE RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT JUNE RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT Page: 6 Packet Pg. 170 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 252854 6/16/2022 078922 BJOLSTAD, BRIANNA (Continued) 001.000.64.571.23.43.00 Tota I : 252855 6/16/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 1342426 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 526.40 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 526.40 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1343788-IN E187WR - AUTOGAS CONVERSION E187WR - AUTOGAS CONVERSION 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Tota I : 252856 6/16/2022 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 23717 EODC/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 EODC/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 EODC/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 125.000.68.595.33.41.00 23723 E22JA/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 E22JA/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 421.000.74.594.34.41.00 23752 ONCALL STORMWATER REVIEW TI ONCALL STORMWATER REVIEW TI 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 Total 252857 6/16/2022 075025 BRANDING IRON LLC 15191 CEMETERY MEMORIAL DAY PROGI CEMETERY MEMORIAL DAY PROGI 130.000.64.536.20.49.00 10.5% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.20.49.00 Total 252858 6/16/2022 078954 BROWN, CARA 05/23/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PARKING F 8.5.c Page: 7 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 171 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252858 6/16/2022 078954 BROWN, CARA (Continued) 001.000.64.571.22.43.00 32.0( 05/23/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 45.3" Total: 77.31 a0i 252859 6/16/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 28694669 CANON ENGINEERING COPIER t U CANON ENGINEERING COPIER E .2 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 253.4.E 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 26.6" -R 28694670 DEV SVCS COPIER LEASE 0 Dev Svcs Copier (SN 3AP01472- Q. 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 217.4, Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 22.8E N Total : 520.3E 252860 6/16/2022 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 10854 10855 ART 10854 10855 ADVENTURES IN ART 10854 ADVENTURES IN ART INSTR E E 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 631.4( .� 10855 ADVENTURES IN ART INSTR 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 315.7( c Total : 947.1( E t 252861 6/16/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC SE2202871 PALO ALTO COMPUTER SERVICES @ Professional Services Palo Alto Projel Q 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 800.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 23.6, Professional Services Palo Alto Projel 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 225.0( Z051377 MS PROJECT SOFTWARE MS Project software license & 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 783.2,1 Page: 8 Packet Pg. 172 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 9 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252861 6/16/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 82.2z Total: 1,914.11 252862 6/16/2022 078866 CENTERPOINT LANGUAGE SERVICES 68555 INTERPRETER 2A0185928 INTERPRETER 2A0185928 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 100.0( Total : 100.0( 252863 6/16/2022 077735 CENTRAL PAVING LLC E21 CA. Pmt 3 CP E21 CA. PMT 3 THRU 6/1/22 E21CA. PMT3 THRU 6/1/22 112.000.68.542.30.48.00 678.9E E21CA. PMT3 THRU 6/1/22 125.000.68.542.30.48.00 2,425.5E E21CA. PMT3 THRU 6/1/22 126.000.68.542.30.48.00 1,815.4E E21CA. PMT3 THRU 6/1/22 423.000.75.535.80.48.21 970.0( E21CA. PMT3 THRU 6/1/22 422.000.72.531.90.48.21 550.0( E21CA. PMT3 THRU 6/1/22 421.000.74.534.80.48.21 1,650.0( Total: 8,090.0( 252864 6/16/2022 074559 CLARK, PATRICK MAY 2022 WHIA CONFERENCE PER DIEM - C WHIA CONFERENCE PER DIEM - M 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 162.2E Total: 162.2E 252865 6/16/2022 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC JUN-2022 C/A CITYOFED00001 Jun-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 661.5� Total : 661.55 252866 6/16/2022 075727 CORT, TODD 6/13/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES Page: 9 Packet Pg. 173 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 10 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252866 6/16/2022 075727 CORT, TODD (Continued) REIMBURSEMENT FOR WRPA CON 001.000.64.571.23.43.00 16.0( REIMBURSEMENT FOR RECREATI( 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 49.0 Total : 65.01 252867 6/16/2022 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 512199 E21 DA/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 E21 DA/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 126.000.68.595.61.41.00 829.7( E21 DA/SERVICES THRU 5.28.22 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 523.8( Tota I : 1,353.5( 252868 6/16/2022 076172 DK SYSTEMS 30340 NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - M, NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - M, 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 153.7.E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 16.1 Total : 169.W 252869 6/16/2022 078332 DOCUSIGN INC LOCKBOX INV32477207 DOCUSIGN ESIGNATURE BUSINES eSignature Business Pro Edition - 001.000.31.514.31.48.00 2,760.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.31.48.00 289.8( Total : 3,049.8( 252870 6/16/2022 075153 DOPPS, MARIA 69663 INTERPRETER 2A0341815 INTERPRETER 2A0341815 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( Total : 130.0( 252871 6/16/2022 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 22-3213.2 TO 22-01 SERVICES THRU 5.8.22 TO 22-01 SERVICES THRU 5.8.22 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 464.0( Page: 10 Packet Pg. 174 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252871 6/16/2022 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC (Continued) 22-3213.3 252872 252873 252874 6/16/2022 068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL 6/16/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 22-15300 3098 3100 Uffe c 6/16/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR221427 AR221570 8.5.c Page: 11 PO # Description/Account Amoun TO 22-01 SERVICES THRU 5.22.22 TO 22-01 SERVICES THRU 5.22.22 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 130.61 Total : 594.6' u) WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE t WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE U 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,290.0( Total: 1,290.0( Z FAC MAINT - NUTS, BOLTS & SCRE 4- O FAC MAINT - NUTS, BOLTS & SCRE R o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 19.3� Q. 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ CAUL N PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ CAUL co 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 T 30.9E 6 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 N 3.2E E CITY PARK BUILDING - SUPPLIES CITY PARK BUILDING - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 39.9 � c 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.2( u Total : 99.8( r Q ACCT MK5031 - EDMONDS PD 5/22 - A12434&12435 BW COPIES 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 56.8E 5/22 - A12434&12435 CLR COPIES 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 162.8E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 23.0 ENGINEERING COPIER 5.2022 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 175 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 252874 6/16/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) AR221912 252875 6/16/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH956429 8.5.c Page: 12 PO # Description/Account Amoun ENGINEERING COPIER 5.2022 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 175.5E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 18.4; MK5610 PUBLIC WORKS USAGE PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 5/6/22-6/5/ m 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 20.4E E PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 5/6/22-6/5/ 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 11.5� PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 5/6/22-6/5/ o 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 11.5� > PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 5/6/22-6/5/ o 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 8.1 £ a PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 5/6/22-6/5/ Q 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 8.1 £ N PUBLIC WORKS USAGE 5/6/22-6/5/ N 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.1, co r 10.5% Sales Tax c 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.1E 10.5% Sales Tax E E 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 1.2, 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 1.2, c 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0.8E @ 10.5% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.8E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.8E Total : 512.OS PUBLIC HEARING BD2 ZONE INTEF Interim Design Standards Multifamily 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 48.1E Page: 12 Packet Pg. 176 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 13 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252875 6/16/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD (Continued) EDH956449 CITY ORDINANCE 4263 City ordinance #4263 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 20.& Tota I : 68.8( 252876 6/16/2022 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 362011 MUSEUM - SUPPLIES MUSEUM - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 181.4( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 19.0f Total: 200.4° 252877 6/16/2022 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS NFalk June 2022 (1) CLAIM FOR EXPENSES: MILEAGE I Claim for expenses: mileage reimb- 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 42.3! Total : 42.3! 252878 6/16/2022 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1107520 WATER - PARTS/ 3/4" & 1" PRV WATER - PARTS/ 3/4" & 1" PRV 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 338.4, 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 35.5, Total : 374.0' 252879 6/16/2022 074613 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE 869-422960560 E20CE/TITLE INSURANCE E20CE/TITLE INSURANCE 112.000.68.595.20.61.00 1,094.8( Tota I : 1,094.8( 252880 6/16/2022 072138 FUELCARE 9067 WWTP: PO 840 TANK WATER & SEI PO 840 TANK WATER & SEDIMENT 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 3,291.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 345.E Total : 3,637.1' Page: 13 Packet Pg. 177 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252881 6/16/2022 011210 GC SYSTEMS 252882 6/16/2022 072634 GCP WW HOLDCO LLC 252883 6/16/2022 075743 GCP WW HOLDCO LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 5646 INV2010001499 INV2050000987 INV2060000216 252884 6/16/2022 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 1250623 252885 6/16/2022 078839 HAHN, ROSS RHahn-6.2022 PO # Description/Account WATER - REBULD CLA-VAL CONTR WATER - REBULD CLA-VAL CONTR 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 Total WATER - WORK WEAR J. BECK WATER - WORK WEAR J. BECK 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 9.9% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 Total WATER - WORK WEAR K. JOHNSO WATER - WORK WEAR K. JOHNSO 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 WATER - WORK WEAR K. KOLBERI WATER - WORK WEAR K. KOLBERi 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 Total OLD PW - SECURITY OLD PW - SECURITY 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total WWTP: 5/25/22 FOOD SUPPLIES F( 5/25/22 FOOD SUPPLIES FOR PW 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 8.5.c Page: 14 Page: 14 Packet Pg. 178 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252885 6/16/2022 078839 078839 HAHN, ROSS 252886 6/16/2022 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 252887 6/16/2022 078961 HOLTROP, JEAN 252888 6/16/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 51203 51208 MAY 2022 PO # Description/Account Total E6FD/SERVICES THRU 5.27.22 E6FD/SERVICES THRU 5.27.22 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 TO 22-01 SERVICES THRU 5.27.22 TO 22-01 SERVICES THRU 5.27.22 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 Total LATE FEE REFUND - EDMONDS PD PET LICENSE LATE FEE REFUND 001.000.322.30.000.00 Total 1020736 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES CITY HALL - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1024847 TRAFFIC - CHISEL FOR #64 TRAFFIC - CHISEL FOR #64 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 192074 WATER/ SEWER - GAS GRILL WATER/ SEWER - GAS GRILL 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 WATER/ SEWER - GAS GRILL 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 2083601 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 8.5.c Page: 15 Amoun 141.21 4,350.8, ui m t 4,118.9� U 8,469.81 •� 0 N 50.9" T 5.2z o N E 25.2, c 2.6( t U M 149.5( Q 149.5( 15.4( 15.4( Page: 15 Packet Pg. 179 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 16 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252888 6/16/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 94.8' 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.7, .. 2330310 F.A.C. - BLINDS F.A.C. - BLINDS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 684.0E 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2525211 CITY PARK - SUPPLIES CITY PARK - SUPPLIES o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 120.8' 10.3% Sales Tax o L 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.4, a 2640354 F.A.C. - BLINDS Q F.A.C. - BLINDS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 N 91.2' N 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5f c 4016632 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 20.9z 10.3% Sales Tax a ; 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.1E 4095522 STREET - SUPPLIES/ GRINDER FOI E STREET - SUPPLIES/ GRINDER FOI U 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 M 348.0( r 10.3% Sales Tax Q 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 35.8z 5025790 YOST - SUPPLIES/ SHEET METAL, YOST - SUPPLIES/ SHEET METAL, 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 53.1: 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.4, 6016310 WATER - SUPPLIES Page: 16 Packet Pg. 180 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252888 6/16/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 17 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 97.7, 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.01 U) 6025539 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ SHOVEL & SI TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ SHOVEL & SI m 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 158.5< E 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 _R 16.3' U 6611328 YOST - SUPPLIES o YOST - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 56.8� 0- 10.3% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.8E Q 8522073 PARKS SHOP - SUPPLIES/ LED N PARKS SHOP - SUPPLIES/ LED N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 174.0( 10.3% Sales Tax c 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 17.9, N 9017116 WATER - SUPPLIES/ HAMMER & LE E WATER - SUPPLIES/ HAMMER & LE 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 82.4' 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 8.4� E 9024003 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES/ SOCKET & @ FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES/ SOCKET & r 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 56.8E Q 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.8E 9053998 WATER - SUPPLIES/ WORK LIGHT, WATER - SUPPLIES/ WORK LIGHT, 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 112.6� 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 11.6 Page: 17 Packet Pg. 181 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 252888 6/16/2022 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 252889 6/16/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3095605 252890 252891 252892 252893 6/16/2022 071642 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 6/16/2022 075479 IDAX 14533 0002213 0002214 6/16/2022 076159 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE MGMT SVCS 50505-1 6/16/2022 073518 INNOVYZE INC Q-121264 8.5.c Page: 18 Description/Account Amoun Total : 2,789.05 WWTP: GAS GRILL FOR PW BARB[ GAS GRILL for PW Barbeque held at 001.000.65.518.20.35.00 229.0( ui 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.35.00 23.5� t Total: 252.55 U PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( o 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 3,879.6E R Total: 3,879.6E o L TRANSPORTATION DATA SVCS THE a TRANSPORTATION DATA SVCS THE Q 001.000.67.518.21.41.00 600.0( N EBCA/THRU 5.31.22-NOT GRANT RI ca EBCA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 r 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 840.0( c Total : 1,440.0( E E22CA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 E22CA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 969.7< aa) E22CA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 E t 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 1,124.81 u. E22CA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 r Q 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 1,083.& Total : 3,178.4( INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL 423.000.75.535.80.49.20 2,325.0( INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 2,325.0( Page: 18 Packet Pg. 182 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 19 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252893 6/16/2022 073518 INNOVYZE INC (Continued) INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL 421.000.74.534.80.49.20 2,805.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.20 244.1 < 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 244.1, 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.20 294.5, Total : 8,237.71 252894 6/16/2022 077390 ISHIGAKI USA LTD 1734 WWTP: PO 830 ROLLER CHAINS & PO 830 ROLLER CHAINS & LINK 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 3,290.9� Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 804.4( Total: 4,095.31 252895 6/16/2022 072530 JACOBSEN'S MARINE 133469 UNIT M-16 - PARTS UNIT M-16 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 24.5 , 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.5£ Total: 27.1 252896 6/16/2022 076136 JEFF ANDERSON 05272022 EDMONDS CREATIVE DISTRICT CL EDMONDS CREATIVE DISTRICT CL 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.0( Total: 600.0( 252897 6/16/2022 078962 JEFFREY & DEBBIE COBB 2-37650 #500133131-NB UTILITY REFUND #500133131-NB Utility refund - receN 411.000.233.000 246.2� Total : 246.25 252898 6/16/2022 075265 KBA INC 3006747 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 Page: 19 Packet Pg. 183 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252898 6/16/2022 075265 KBA INC 252899 252900 252901 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 6/16/2022 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 300637836 6/16/2022 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 6/16/2022 068401 KING CO OFFICE OF FINANCE 10197 10198 SOCCER 10199 10200 SOCCER 10201 SOCCER 119313 8.5.c Page: 20 PO # Description/Account Amoun EOMA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 24,857.2( EOMA/SERVICES THRU 5.31.22 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 7,424.8E � Total: 32,282.0f CUST 100828 - EDMONDS PD t U 10 CASES - COPY PAPER E 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 270.2( Z HANDLING FEE o 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 97.3( R 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 L 28.3, 0- Total : CL 395.81Q 10197 10198 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER II N N 10197 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRL 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 T 694.2( 10198 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRL N 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 636.3E E 10199 10200 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER II 10199 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRL r 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 659.4� r- 10200 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRL E E 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 647.9, U 10201 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRL° 10201 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRL r Q 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 636.3E Total : 3,274.31 W LRD/ W RIA 8- AWARD 114450 FO WLRD/ WRIA 8- AWARD 114450 FO 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 14,352.0- Total : 14,352.01 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 184 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252902 6/16/2022 078898 LANG, LIAM GYM MONITOR 6/7 PICKLEBALL GYM MONITOR 6/7/22 PICKLEBALL GYM MONITOR 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 45.0( Tota I : 45.0( 252903 6/16/2022 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0154332 CITY HALL - PAINT CITY HALL - PAINT 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 71.9� ECO FEES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.6( E0154333 YOST POOL - PUTTY YOST POOL - PUTTY 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.9� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.2( E0154334 YOST POOL - SUPPLIES YOST POOL - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 213.4: ECO FEES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.8E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.7- E0154335 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES & PAINT CITY HALL - SUPPLIES & PAINT 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 73.6E ECO FEES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.8: Total : 415.2, 252904 6/16/2022 078963 MOLNAR BUILDING LLC 7-08850 #500132941-LT UTILITY REFUND #500132941-LT Utility refund - receiv( 411.000.233.000 173.9( Page: 21 Packet Pg. 185 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 22 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252904 6/16/2022 078963 078963 MOLNAR BUILDING LLC (Continued) Total : 173.9E 252905 6/16/2022 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0654485-IN SEWER - LABOR REPAIR BROKEN SEWER - LABOR REPAIR BROKEN 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 78.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 8.1 Total : 86.1 <, 252906 6/16/2022 074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEN 49794 PLAQUES PLAQUES 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 1,832.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 192.3( Total : 2,024.3E 252907 6/16/2022 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 46052 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL SUPPLIES: CHEMICAL 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 2,245.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 235.7< 46053 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL SUPPLIES: SUCTION C 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 1,027.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 107.9, Total : 3,616.4° 252908 6/16/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-208465 UNIT 21 - OIL & FUEL FILTERS UNIT 21 - OIL & FUEL FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 18.4, 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.9, Total : 20.31 252909 6/16/2022 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00106514 SEWER - SEWER HOSE Page: 22 Packet Pg. 186 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 23 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252909 6/16/2022 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY (Continued) SEWER - SEWER HOSE 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 3,200.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 336.0( Total: 3,536.0( 252910 6/16/2022 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 44305 EDMONDS PD 2 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS - MA` 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 40.0( Total : 40.0( 252911 6/16/2022 069633 PET PROS 82 EDMONDS PD - ACE ACE FOOD -DISCOUNT 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 119.6� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 12.5 , Total : 132.2E 252912 6/16/2022 074793 PETDATA INC 10789 MAY 2022 - EDMONDS PD MAY 2022 1 YEAR LICENSES 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 575.4( 5 LATE FEES COLLECTED 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 12.5( Total : 587.9( 252913 6/16/2022 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 4,392.3E Total : 4,392.3E 252914 6/16/2022 074712 RAINIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAB 4195 WWTP: CERIODAPHNIA DUBIAACI CERIODAPHNIA DUBIAACUTE TES 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 600.0( 4394 WWTP: FATHEAD MINNOW ACUTE FATHEAD MINNOW ACUTE TEST Page: 23 Packet Pg. 187 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252914 6/16/2022 074712 RAINIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAB (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 800.0( Tota I : 1,400.0( 252915 6/16/2022 078283 REINTEGRATED MEDIA 440 A/V TECH SUPPORT A/V Tech support for hybrid council 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 875.0( Total : 875.0( 252916 6/16/2022 068657 ROBERT HALF 60155214 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Accountii 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 731.8E 60163329 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Grants 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 3,858.0( 60184328 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 2,440.0( Total: 7,029.8E 252917 6/16/2022 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-036589 UNIT 960 - BATTERY UNIT 960 - BATTERY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 133.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.9 , Tota I : 146.9 , 252918 6/16/2022 078953 SANDSTROM, JAY 6/2/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PARKING F 001.000.64.571.22.43.00 42.0( Total : 42.0( 252919 6/16/2022 078964 SCHULTZ, RYAN APRIL/MAY MILEAGE APRIL/MAY RANGER CLASSROOM APRIL/MAY RANGER CLASSROOM 001.000.64.571.23.43.00 97.1 REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 60.0( Page: 24 Packet Pg. 188 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 25 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252919 6/16/2022 078964 078964 SCHULTZ, RYAN (Continued) Total : 157.1' 252920 6/16/2022 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC S3-7322271 UNIT 10 - PARTS UNIT 10 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 20.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.1 Total : 23.0! 252921 6/16/2022 078966 SKAGIT SHOOTING SPORTS INC 11137 BALANCE FORWARD BALANCE FORWAD 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 -121.8( 12110 BRASS PURCHASE REFUND BRASS REFUND 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 -956.3( 12116 INV 12116 - EDMONDS PD TRL STREAMLIGHT GUN LIGHTS 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 1,299.9( 8.6% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 111.7� Tota I : 333.5' 252922 6/16/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200326460 HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 20.7E 200496834 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 69.5� 200650851 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 41.8 , 200651644 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 618.4: 201184538 HICKMAN PARK HICKMAN PARK Page: 25 Packet Pg. 189 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 26 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252922 6/16/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 25.7,' 201383270 CITY PARK GAZEBO CITY PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 20.7E 201431236 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 20.0' E 201501277 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 24.8� o 201790003 ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH �a ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH o L 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 33.6, a 202114484 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL Q CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 72.5f N 202250635 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 6 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 0 20.7f N 205184385 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV E LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 24.1 E 205307580 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING m DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 127.8� U 221593742 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W Q 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 81.4( 221732084 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 87.7- 222704272 WWTP: 5/5-6/3/22 FLOWMETER 101 5/5-6/3/22 FLOW METER 2400 HIG 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 22.2( Page: 26 Packet Pg. 190 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 27 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 252922 6/16/2022 037375 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) Total : 1,312.45 252923 6/16/2022 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 81653 PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 912.0( Total : 912.0( 252924 6/16/2022 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 180039365-00 FLEET - SHOP PARTS & SUPPLIES FLEET - SHOP PARTS & SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 182.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 19.1; Total: 201.71 252925 6/16/2022 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 20594 TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 2,000.0( Total: 2,000.0( 252926 6/16/2022 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY 136199 DEV SVCS SUPPLIES Ink cartridges for HP PageWide plott( 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 695.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 72.9F Tota I : 767.91 252927 6/16/2022 038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION 3006626308 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUI ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUI 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 461.9� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 48.5' Total : 510.5( 252928 6/16/2022 074471 TULEY, BRIAN June 2022 ACCIS MEMBERSHIP REIMBURSEN ACCIS membership reimbursement 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 75.0( Page: 27 Packet Pg. 191 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252928 6/16/2022 074471 074471 TULEY, BRIAN 252929 6/16/2022 073310 UNISAFE INC 252930 6/16/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 714739 001850 252931 6/16/2022 075762 VECA ELECTRIC & TECHNOLOGIES 111658 111659 PO # Description/Account WWTP: PO 847 GLOVES PO 847 GLOVES 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total Total WWTP: PO 851 COREPRO PO 851 COREPRO 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 WWTP: ABSORBENT PADS FOR PE PO 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total TROUBLESHOOT & REPAIR CAT6 F Troubleshoot & repair CAT6 run for 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 CAT6 RUN TROUBLESHOOT & REP Troubleshoot & repair CAT6 run to 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 8.5.c Page: 28 Page: 28 Packet Pg. 192 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 252931 6/16/2022 075762 075762 VECA ELECTRIC & TECHNOLOGIES (Continued) 252932 6/16/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9907764774 252933 6/16/2022 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 252934 6/16/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 252935 6/16/2022 064213 WSSUATREASURER 252936 6/16/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 201136215 201136430 8203 8205 2022-05 EDMONDS 253-011-1177 Description/Account Total C/A 442201730-00001 iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 Dayton St Stormwater Pump Station 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 Total ACCT 23104-001 - EDMONDS PD - P PRE SUPERVISOR TRAINING 3/21 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 ACCT 23104-001 - EDMONDS PD - SANOGO - BLEA 3/22-7/28/22 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 HATCHETT- BLEA 3/22-7/28/22 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Total EDMONDSPD 10 EMPLOYEE B/C 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 EDMONDS PD 200 - 3 PART CRIM TRESPASS FOR 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 Total SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: MAY SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: MAY 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 8.5.c Page: 29 Amoun 1,170.0: 35.1 , ui 26.5, t 61.6' U 0 300.0( 0 Q. 4,431.0( C 4,431.0( N 9,162.0( W r 6 0 N 199.9( 20.7� m E t 179.0( Q 18.8( 418.45 6,232.0( 6,232.0( Page: 29 Packet Pg. 193 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 252936 6/16/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 96 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 96 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.5.c Page: 30 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 6.4z PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 24.4E Ui PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE m 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 24.4E u PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE' E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 24.4E 'R PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 24.4E O PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 24.4E o 425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M Q- a CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION Q 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 144.7< N 425-775-1344 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION N 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION T 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 113.5E c 425-775-7865 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI' E .T 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 74.6z 425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIALACC 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.4E E 425-776-5316 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII U 425 776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII r 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 110.2E Q Total : 598.3: Bank total : 390,343.91 Total vouchers : 390,343.9' Page: 30 Packet Pg. 194 vchlist 06/ 16/2022 12 :12 :59 P M Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 8.5.c Page: 31 Amoun a Page: 31 Packet Pg. 195 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Engineering Protect Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 175th St. SW Slope Stabilizatio E21 FB c560 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 SWR 2019 Storm Maintenance Project t8FC 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR 2019 Traffic C MTR 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES Waterlin 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 020 Guardrail Installations d 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 STR z E 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 � 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STR 0 2020 Traffic Calming AL > 0 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 STR 0. EOCC 053 TR Q. Q 2021 Guardrail Installations E21 AB i057 STR N Mverlay Progra 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i062 STR m c i0 L 021 Sewer Overlay Progra E21 CC 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 STM 1 Traffic Calming 2021 Waterline Overlay Program kL022 Guardrail Program 2022 Overlay Program V22 Pedestrian Safety program 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program 2022 Siga"pgrariP� 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program IF022 Traffic Calming Progra 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study 222 Waterline Overlay Program 2023 Overlay Program kL023 Sewer Overlay Program A 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program 220th Adaptive 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements E21 CB i059 WTR i073 E22CA i063 STR VE22DA STR E22CC i065 STR E22AA E22CD i066 STR E22NB s030 UTILITIES E23CA i074 STR E23CC E23CD i077 STM llllllllllllllllll�KE23CB TR EBAB i028 STR E20CB i05 STR EBCA i029 STR Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 196 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Protect Title L6th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing Mr Regional Fadme-Design Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project I itywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion Civic Center Playfield (Construction) Civic Center Playfield (Design) V Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project Elm St. Waterline Replacement a Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization shomi 199 Revitalization Stage 3 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) Lake Ballinger Associated Projects Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study r Minor Sidewalk Program NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) - Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update Slope Repair & Stabi Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements Ferrinville Creek Recovery Stud Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project khase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number JOL c368 EBCC i031 STIR EEEFTR E9DA i040 STIR E9F STM I EODC i050 STIR E6GB c488 E7DC i026 STIR d z EOMA c551 PRK EOMA PRK 2 ESJB c482 WTR 0 c455 > 0 E4MB c443 FAC `0. 21 FE 564 0. Q E21JB c561 WTR N STIR . ESKA c473 WTR m E22CE i067 STIR E22CF E4FD c436 STM s011 E4GC c461 SWR 22FB 157 STM E6DD i017 STIR E7FG STAM EONA s025 GF TM E20FC c552 STM E21FC E22GA c566 SWR EOJA c549 WM E21JA c558 WTR EOFB c547 STM E21 FD STM E22FA c567 STM Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 197 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Title khase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project A Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services Seaview Park Infiltra SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) Standard Details Updates tormwater Comp Plan Update Sunset Walkway Improvements Irtility Funds reserve Policies Study Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) Laterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) r RNillow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades Yost Park Infiltration Facility Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number EOGA c548 AEM&SWM E21 GA c559 SW R c502 AC E21 GB c562 SWR E22CG i069 STIR E20CE ESNA solo UTILITIES d z E1 DA c354 STR UTILITIES 2 E7MA c544 PRK 0 0 E7MA m103 PRK 0. vllV4F3V c435 1W Q EOJB s026 WTR cm N E22J B m 160 WTR . E21 FA c556 PRK m c Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 198 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Project Title L020 Guardrail Installations 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades �raffic Calming 2020 Overlay Program 2020 Waterline 2020 Pedestrian Task Force 020 Pedestrian Safety Prog Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project eaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 d Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement P Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Civic Center Playfield (Design) Civic Cente?layfield (Construction) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number EOAA i046 EOAB i047 STIR TR EOCA i042 STIR E EODA s024 STIR EODC i05O STIR -71 d z EOFB c547 STM EOJA c549 WTR 0 M EOMA c536 PRK 0 0. Q. EOMA VW551 1WRK Q Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GF 1/ at 212th SMntersection Improvements E1CA c368 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1DA c354 STIR verlay (196th St. to OVD) A 0i052 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 STIR Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 STM 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 STIR kL021 Guardrail Installations 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 STR V21 Waterline Overlay Program E21 CB i059�WTR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i06O SWR 2021 Stormwater Overlay Progra E21 CD — in Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 STIR 021 PedestriafFask Fo Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 PRK 75th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM khase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project M c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 STM Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA WR Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SWR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JA c558 E21JB c561 WTR WTR Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 199 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Engineering Protect Project Title Protect Accounting Funding Number Number L022 Signal Upgrades 2022 Traffic Calming Program F022 Guardrail Program a 2022 Overlay Program 2022 Waterline 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program 2022 Stormwater Overlay Prog t 99 Revitalization Stage 3 wy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22AA i070 E22AB i071 STIR TR E22CA i063 STIR E22CB i06 E22CC i065 STIR E22CE i067 STIR vi SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 STIR U F022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA E Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 STM 0 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoratio E22FB a157 `° Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 SWR 0 0. Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project �22,1= 5 WTR Q. Q Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR N nds reserve Policies Study E22NA UTIL� co r 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES m L 023 Overlay Progra E23CA � 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR z 023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC SWIF o 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM a. LVillow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 STM a� D Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 STM a on reet Stormwater Pump Station INW455 STM d 3 a Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 SWRLL & Fishing Pier RehaW FAC c m Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study E5GB s011 SWR E ayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) y Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating 45tandard Details Update Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion Minor Sidewalk Program Stormwater Comp Plan Update Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E5KA c473 WTR E6AA s014 STIR E6AB i015 E6DD i017 STIR 017 E6GB c488 SWR E7DC i026 STIR E7FA m105 STM Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 200 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Project Title NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) 2019 Waterline Replacement Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) ent & Restoration (Pre - Design) 220th Adaptive NEFF77 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th FDA Curb Ram 2019 Storm Maintenance Project F019 Sewerline Replacement Project 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update 2019 Traffic Calming 2019 Waterline Overla Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number E7FG m013 E7JA c498 WTR PRK E7MA c544 PRK I E8AB i028 STR E8CC i031 STR vi d z E8FC c525 STM M E8JA c523 WTR 0 M 0 E9AA i038 STR 0. Q. L9CB IVTR Q E9DA i040 STR N E9FA s022 STM E9MA c502 FAC Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 201 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 8.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements ElCA c368 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21GB c562 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Funding STM STR STR STM STM FAC STM SWR WTR WTR SWR PRK WTR FAC SWR WTR STM PRK PRK STM STM SWR WTR PRK STM PRK WTR SWR STM WTR SWR STM STM WTR SWR STM STR STR ui m z U E .2 U 0 R 0 L a a Q Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 202 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 8.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21 AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 CB i059 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 Funding STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR WTR STIR STIR STIR STIR STR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR WTR SWR STM STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR WTR ui m z U E .2 U 0 R 0 L a a Q Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 203 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 8.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SWR 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 STM Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 PRK OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB s0l l SWR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 STIR Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 STM 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 STM 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STIR Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GF Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES ui m z U E .2 U 0 R 0 L a a Q Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 204 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 8.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E41FE c455 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1CA c368 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 Funding FAC FAC GF PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR ui m z U E .2 U 0 R 0 L a a Q Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 205 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 8.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21 AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (224th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 Funding STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR ui m z U E .2 U 0 R 0 L a a Q Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 206 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 8.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB s0l l SWR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR ui m z U E .2 U 0 R 0 L a a Q Revised 6/16/2022 Packet Pg. 207 8.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Megan Menkveld Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History Approval of Clothing Allowance checks #65080 through #65088 dated June 17, 2022 for $3,741.92 and payroll checks #65089 through #65095 for $8,102.00 dated June 17, 2022, payroll direct deposit for $652,251.23, benefit checks #65096 through #65101 and wire payments for $652,117.62 for the pay period June 1, 2022 through June 15, 2022. Staff Recommendation Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: 06-01 to 06-15-22 payroll earnings summary report 06-01-22 to 06-15-22 benefit checks 06-14-22 clothing allowance payroll earnings summary Packet Pg. 208 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,049 (06/01/2022 to 06/15/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 111 ABSENT NO PAY LEAVE 92.00 0.00 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 446.25 18,758.54 122 VACATION VACATION 961.35 42,392.65 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 92.50 4,481.61 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 15.00 609.55 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 159.03 6,817.43 129 SICK Police Sick Leave L & 1 96.00 3,225.90 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 10.00 559.72 141 BEREAVEMENT BEREAVEMENT 26.00 1,086.74 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Day Used 126.62 5,984.14 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 126.59 6,687.13 157 SICK SICK LEAVE PAYOFF 400.00 24,997.12 158 VACATION VACATION PAYOFF 76.94 4,808.20 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 17,588.45 755,254.69 194 SICK Emerqency Sick Leave 218.00 9,471.72 195 REGULAR HOURS ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE 184.00 6,992.50 196 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 70.00 2,984.10 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 24.25 877.46 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 42.00 2,394.34 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 15.00 1,361.87 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 362.00 28,007.30 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 18.50 1,308.16 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 -104.21 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 381.05 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,165.63 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 1,516.98 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 64.25 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 148.00 0.00 903 MISCELLANEOUS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 0.00 -37.50 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 141.63 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 148.12 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 92.72 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 185.44 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 308.91 ctr MISCELLANEOUS CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM 0.00 520.00 06/15/2022 Packet Pg. 209 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,049 (06/01/2022 to 06/15/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount deftat MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 171.68 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 127.02 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 895.02 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 720.18 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 772.80 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 6,357.84 firear MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 461.43 fmla ABSENT FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID 18.00 0.00 fmlc COMP HOURS Familv Medical Leave -Comp Used 24.00 932.45 hol HOLIDAY HOLIDAY 10.00 806.44 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 273.06 less MISCELLANEOUS LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR 0.00 88.70 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 941.49 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 523.60 Ig12 LONGEVITY Longevity 9% 0.00 4,295.45 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 945.39 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 706.98 Iq2 LONGEVITY PAY LONGEVITY PAY 4% 0.00 259.00 Iq4 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 459.32 Iq5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 1,597.90 Iq6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 308.99 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 360.52 Iq8 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 8% 0.00 252.04 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 127.02 ooc MISCELLANEOUS OUT OF CLASS 0.00 416.27 pds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 103.70 pfmp ABSENT Paid Familv Medical Unpaid/Sup 28.00 0.00 pfms SICK Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK 56.00 2,822.67 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,627.88 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER 0.00 201.50 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 0.00 329.16 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 201.50 slw SICK SICK LEAVE ADD BACK 349.93 0.00 st REGULAR HOURS Serqeant Pay 0.00 151.13 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 127.02 06/15/2022 Packet Pg. 210 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,049 (06/01/2022 to 06/15/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount vab VACATION VACATION ADD BACK 10.07 0.00 vap VACATION Vacation Premium 64.50 2,604.62 21,923.23 $965,349.41 Total Net Pay: $660,353.23 8.6.a 06/15/2022 Packet Pg. 211 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,049 - 06/01/2022 to 06/15/2022 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 65096 06/17/2022 bpas BPAS 5,086.76 0.00 65097 06/17/2022 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 5,904.00 0.00 65098 06/17/2022 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 698.26 0.00 65099 06/17/2022 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 3,496.02 0.00 65100 06/17/2022 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,565.00 0.00 65101 06/17/2022 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 6,506.81 0.00 26,256.85 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 3377 06/17/2022 awc AWC 352,765.12 0.00 3380 06/17/2022 us US BANK 123,001.38 0.00 3381 06/17/2022 mebt WTRISC FBO #N317761 115,929.46 0.00 3382 06/17/2022 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 27,923.52 0.00 3384 06/17/2022 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,912.29 0.00 3386 06/17/2022 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 329.00 0.00 625,860.77 0.00 Grand Totals: 652,117.62 0.00 8.6.b 6/15/2022 Packet Pg. 212 Hour Type Hour Class 903 MISCELLANEOUS Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,086 (06/14/2022 to 06/14/2022) Description CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Hours Amount 0.00 4,200.00 0.00 $4,200.00 Total Net Pay: $3,741.92 8.6.c 06/15/2022 Packet Pg. 213 8.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Resolution Commending Student Representative to City Council Staff Lead: Council President Vivian Olson Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Student volunteers are important to the fabric and character of the City of Edmonds. We are grateful to Brook Roberts, who served two terms as City Council Student Representative from September 2020- June 2021 and September 2021-June 2022. Staff Recommendation Consider and support the proposed resolution. Narrative Today we commend Brook Roberts for his dedication to the City of Edmonds. Attachments: Resolution Commending Brook Roberts Packet Pg. 214 8.7.a Resolution No: A Resolution Of The Edmonds City Council Commending Brook Roberts for Service as a Student Representative To The Edmonds City Council Whereas, Brook Roberts, a student_ at Shorewood High School, volunteered to serve as a Student Representative of the Edmonds City Council; and 'Iti Whereas, Mr. Roberts served as a student member of the City Council for two terms; September 2020 — June 2021, and September 2021 - June 2022; and - i J Whereas, Mr. Roberts strived to advocate for equity in issues facing Edmonds' youth, and offered a conduit between Council and the Edmonds 'KSWth Commission where he also served; and Whereas, He was enthusiastic and worked diligently on the Suicide Prevention Campaign, facilitated a speaker presentation on Rank Choice voting, and helped in sharing information about the use of pronouns in City-wide communications. Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved, that the City Council and the Mayor hereby extend their best wishes to Brook and his future endeavors and express the hope that he will continue to contribute to the democratic process of government in the City of Edmonds and elsewhere. Passed, Approved, and Adopted this 21 st day of June, 2022. Mike Nelson, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember J -- " Susan Paine, CouncilmImbfj Scott Passey, City Clerk Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember Packet Pg. 215 8.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Ordinance to Add Human Services to PSPP Committee Staff Lead: Councilmember Susan Paine Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History The City Council periodically adjusts the content of their standing committee meetings to conform to the desires of the city council. This item was reviewed on 6/14/22 in the Public Safety, Personnel and Planning Committee and forwarded to the consent agenda. Staff Recommendation Consider and support the proposed ordinance. Narrative The City Council has added significant programming and funding streams for our Human Services program. The work of Human Services involves multiple departments and the standing committee is a proper platform for policy discussions. Attachments: Ordinance adding Human Services to PSPP Committee Packet Pg. 216 8.8.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADDING A NEW PROGRAM TO THE REGULAR STANDING CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS, AND AMENDING ECC 1.04.010 WHEREAS, the city council has the power to organize and regulate its internal affairs under RCW 35A.11.020; and WHEREAS, the city council has determined that the city's Human Services Program shall provide reports at regular city council committee meetings; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1.04.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Regular public meeting time and days," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfike through): 1.04.010 Regular public meeting time and days. A. Full Council. Regular meetings of the city council shall be held on every Tuesday of every month, except for the second and fifth Tuesdays of a month, at 7:00 p.m. Regular meetings of the city council shall be held as a hybrid meeting that is accessible both virtually and in -person and where the in -person component is conducted -in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 Fifth Avenue N., Edmonds, Washington. Council meetings shall adjourn no later than 10:00 p.m. on the day initiated unless such adjournment is extended by an affirmative vote of a majority of the council as a whole plus one. B. Council Committees. The city council shall have the following standing committees: finance; parks and public works ("PPW"); public safety, planning, human services, and personnel ("PSPHSP"). Regular meetings of the city council standing committees shall be held on the second Tuesday of every month. Councilmembers and staff may attend all committee meetings virtually. Members of the public may view the meeting virtually from their own device or from a monitor that provided by the City in the City Council conference room, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. The respective regular committee meeting times shall be as follows: (1) PSHSPP shall commence at 4:30 p.m. and end at 5:30 p.m.; (2) Finance shall commence at 5:30 p.m. and end at 7:30 p.m.; and (3) PPW shall commence at 7:30 p.m. and end at 9:30 p.m. Recordings of city council standing committee meetings shall be made and posted online. Packet Pg. 217 8.8.a Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 218 8.8.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADDING A NEW PROGRAM TO THE REGULAR STANDING CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS, AND AMENDING ECC 1.04.010 The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 219 8.9 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Opioid Settlement Participation Form Staff Lead: Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office Department: City Attorney's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History On May 24, 2022, the City Council approved the Mayor's signature on the "One Washington Memorandum of Understanding Between Washington Municipalities" (MOU) to opt the City in to the settlement of certain opioid lawsuits brought by Washington State against the three major opioid distributors and other entities involved in the pharmaceutical supply chain that manufacture and dispense prescription opioids. The next step in this process for which the City Council has already given conceptual approval is to approve the filing with the State of a Subdivision Settlement Participation Form. Recommendation Approval of filing of Subdivision Settlement Participation Form on consent agenda. Narrative The State has reached an agreement in principle to settle its lawsuit against the three opioid distributors for $518 Million. The attached letter from Attorney General Bob Ferguson explains that the State has entered into this agreement with the opioid distributors and that the State requires municipalities to file the attached Subdivision Settlement Participation Form by each municipality as evidence of its acceptance of the settlement. The form references the Distributors Washington Settlement Agreement, which is also attached hereto. By authorizing the filing of the Participation Form, the City acknowledges that it is aware of and agrees to the provisions of the Distributors Washington Settlement Agreement and the related Distributor Global Settlement Agreement. The Distributor Global Settlement Agreement can be accessed by clicking on the following link: <https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/wp- content/uploads/2022/03/Final Distributor Settlement Agreement 3.25.22 Final.pdf> The City Attorney's Office can answer questions regarding the requirements of these documents as needed. Attachments: Opioid Settlement Attachments for 6.21.2022 CC Meeting Packet Pg. 220 8.9.a Bob Ferguson ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 1125 Washington Street SE — PO Box 40100 — Olympia, WA 98504-0100 June 1, 2022 Dear Local Elected Leaders: After six months of trial, my office recently announced an agreement in principle with the three largest opioid distributors, Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen and McKesson. The resolution will result in these three companies paying approximately $518 million over 17 years if all conditions are met. If approved, this will also constitute one of the largest settlements in state history. As detailed in the attached agreement, you and your colleagues will have discretion to earmark a significant portion of these resources to combat the opioid epidemic in your communities. The opioid distributor settlement will only be finalized after 100% of litigating Washington local governments and 90% of non -litigating Washington local governments with a population over 10,000 agree to the deal by executing and returning the enclosed Participation Form. We have a deadline of September 23, 2022 for local government approval. I strongly urge you to agree to the settlement. While no settlement is perfect, this resolution will result in our state receiving significantly more than we would have received if we accepted the national resolution earlier this year. If we do not receive the requisite participation by the local governments, we will not receive the $518 million to help Washington combat the opioid epidemic. Additionally, if approved, these resources will start flowing into our communities this year to abate the crisis that continues to devastate families across our state. Local governments will be able to choose from a broad array of strategies to combat the epidemic. As examples, this includes: • Supporting individuals in treatment and recovery, including providing comprehensive wrap -around services to individuals with opioid use disorder, including housing, transportation, education, job placement, job training or childcare; • Addressing the needs of pregnant women and their families, including those with babies with neonatal disorder; • Preventing opioid misuse, overprescribing and overdoses through, among other strategies, school -based and youth -focused programs, public education campaigns, increased availability and distribution of naloxone and other drugs that treat overdoses, additional training and enhancements to the prescription drug monitoring program; and • Supporting first responders, among other strategies. Packet Pg. 221 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 8.9.a Local Elected Leaders June 1, 2022 Page 2 This structure is similar to the arrangement that 48 other states and local governments have entered into with opioid distributors. Importantly, no group of litigating or non -litigating jurisdictions has decided not to approve the national settlement, and this resolution will bring tens of millions more to our communities. Since February of last year, our office has recovered a total of more than $730 million from opioid litigation, including $183 million in recoveries from Purdue Pharma, more than $18 million from Mallinckrodt, and $13.5 million from McKinsey to address harms from the opioid crisis. This includes $159 million in additional resources because we rejected national settlements involving Purdue Pharma and the distributors and took those corporations to court. Our trial with Johnson & Johnson is scheduled for September 2022. Sincerely, BOB FERGUSON Attorney General RWF/jlg Encl. Packet Pg. 222 8.9.a Exhibit F Subdivision Settlement Participation Form Governmental Entity: State: Authorized Official: Address 1: Address 2: City, State, Zip: Phone: Email: The governmental entity identified above ("Governmental Entity"), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated May 2, 2022 ("Distributors Washington Settlement"), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Distributors Washington Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Distributors Washington Settlement, including the Distributor Global Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021 ("Global Settlement") attached to the Distributors Washington Settlement as Exhibit H, understands that all terms in this Participation Form have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by signing this Participation Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Distributors Washington Settlement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein. 2. The Governmental Entity shall, within 14 days of October 1, 2022 and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, secure the dismissal with prejudice of any Released Claims that it has filed. 4. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Distributors Washington Settlement pertaining to Subdivisions as defined therein. 5. By agreeing to the terms of the Distributors Washington Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after December 1, 2022. 6. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Distributors Washington Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein. 7. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the Washington Consent Judgment Court for purposes limited to that court's role as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the Distributors Washington Settlement. The Governmental Entity likewise agrees to arbitrate before the National Arbitration Panel as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent otherwise provided in the Distributors Washington Settlement. F-1 Packet Pg. 223 8.9.a 8. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Distributors Washington Settlement as provided therein. 9. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Distributors Washington Settlement, including, but not limited to, all provisions of Section XI of the Global Settlement, and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Distributors Washington Settlement are intended by the Agreement Parties to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Distributors Washington Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim. 10. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision as set forth in the Distributors Washington Settlement. 11. In connection with the releases provided for in the Distributors Washington Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads: General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, and that if known by him or her would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party. A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Released Claims, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the date the Distributors Washington Settlement becomes effective pursuant to Section II.B of the Distributors Washington Settlement, any and all Released Claims that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities' decision to participate in the Distributors Washington Settlement. F-2 Packet Pg. 224 8.9.a 12. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Distributors Washington Settlement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Participation Form is worded differently from Exhibit F to the Distributors Washington Settlement or interpreted differently from the Distributors Washington Settlement in any respect, the Distributors Washington Settlement controls. I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Participation Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity. Signature: Name: Title: Date: F-3 Packet Pg. 225 8.9.a DISTRIBUTORS WASHINGTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT E r Q Packet Pg. 226 8.9.a Table of Contents I. Overview..............................................................................................................................1 II. Conditions to Effectiveness of Agreement.......................................................................... I E III. Participation by Subdivisions..............................................................................................3 0 IV. Settlement Payments 3 0 V. Plaintiffs' Attorneys' Fees and Costs ..................................................................................4 VI. Release 6 a. c to VII. Miscellaneous ...................................................................................................................... 6 E to Exhibit A Primary Subdivisions................................................................................................. A-1 as 'o Exhibit B Litigating Subdivisions................................................................................................B-1 a 0 Exhibit C ABC IRS Form 1098-F...............................................................................................C-1 c Exhibit D Cardinal Health IRS Form 1098-F ............................................................................. D-1 as U U Exhibit E McKesson IRS Form 1098-F.......................................................................................E-1 N N t7 N Exhibit F Subdivision Settlement Participation Form................................................................. F-1 r N to Exhibit G Consent Judgment and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice ................................ G-1 w N r Exhibit H Distributor Global Settlement Agreement.................................................................. H-1 0) as Packet Pg. 227 8.9.a DISTRIBUTORS — WASHINGTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. Overview This Distributors Washington Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") sets forth the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement between and among the State of Washington, McKesson Corporation ("McKesson"), Cardinal Health, Inc. ("Cardinal") and AmerisourceBergen Corporation ("Amerisource") (collectively, the "Agreement Parties") to resolve opioid-related Claims against McKesson, Cardinal, and/or Amerisource (collectively, "Settling Distributors"). By entering into this Agreement, the State of Washington and its Participating Subdivisions agree to be bound by all terms and conditions of the Distributor Global Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021 (including its exhibits) ("Global Settlement"), which (including its exhibits) is incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit H.1 By entering this Agreement, and upon execution of an Agreement Regarding the State of Washington and the Distributor Global Settlement Agreement ("Enforcement Committee Agreement"), unless otherwise set forth in this Agreement, the Settling Distributors agree to treat the State of Washington for all purposes as if it were a Settling State under the Global Settlement and its Participating Subdivisions for all purposes as if they were Participating Subdivisions under the Global Settlement. Unless stated otherwise in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement are intended to be consistent with the terms of the Global Settlement and shall be construed accordingly. Unless otherwise defined in this Agreement, all capitalized terms in this Agreement shall be defined as they are in the Global Settlement. The Settling Distributors have agreed to the below terms for the sole purpose of settlement, and nothing herein, including in any exhibit to this Agreement, may be taken as or construed to be an admission or concession of any violation of law, rule, or regulation, or of any other matter of fact or law, or of any liability or wrongdoing, or any misfeasance, nonfeasance, or malfeasance, all of which the Settling Distributors expressly deny. No part of this Agreement, including its statements and commitments, and its exhibits, shall constitute or be used as evidence of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing by the Settling Distributors. Unless the contrary is expressly stated, this Agreement is not intended for use by any third party for any purpose, including submission to any court for any purpose. II. Conditions to Effectiveness of Agreement A. Global Settlement Conditions to Effectiveness. 1. The Agreement Parties acknowledge that certain deadlines set forth in Section VIII of the Global Settlement passed before the execution of this Agreement. For ' The version of the Global Settlement as updated on March 25, 2022 is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit H. Further updates to the Global Settlement shall be deemed incorporated into this Agreement and shall supersede all earlier versions of the updated provisions. Packet Pg. 228 that reason, (i) Settling Distributors agree to treat the State of Washington as satisfying the deadlines set forth in Section VIII of the Global Settlement provided that the State of Washington satisfies its obligations set forth in this Section II and (ii) the State of Washington agrees to treat Settling Distributors as having satisfied all notice obligations under Section VIII.B of the Global Settlement as to the State of Washington. 2. The State of Washington shall deliver all signatures and releases required by the Agreement to be provided by the Settling States to the Settling Distributors by September 30, 2022. This Section II.A.2 supersedes the deadline for delivering those signatures and releases set forth in Section VIII.A.I of the Global Settlement. B. Agreement with Enforcement Committee. This Agreement shall not become effective unless the Enforcement Committee and the Settling Distributors execute the Enforcement Committee Agreement. If the Enforcement Committee Agreement is not executed by June 1, 2022, the State of Washington and Settling Distributors will promptly negotiate an agreement that mirrors the Global Settlement to the extent possible and with a credit of $1,000,000 to Settling Distributors to account for possible credits the Settling Distributors would have received under Section V of this Agreement from the State Cost Fund and the Litigating Subdivision Cost Fund of the Global Settlement and to be deducted from the Year 7 payment described in Section V.B.1 and Section V.C.g of this Agreement. C. Participation by Subdivisions. If the condition in Section II.B has been satisfied, this Agreement shall become effective upon one of the following conditions being satisfied: 1. All Litigating Subdivisions in the State of Washington and ninety percent (90%) of Non -Litigating Primary Subdivisions (calculated by population pursuant to the Global Settlement) in the State of Washington must become Participating Subdivisions by September 23, 2022. 2. If the condition set forth in Section II.C.1 is not met, the Settling Distributors shall have sole discretion to accept the terms of this Agreement, which shall become effective upon notice provided by the Settling Distributors to the State of Washington. If the condition set forth by Section II.C.1 is not met and Settling Distributors do not exercise discretion to accept this Agreement, this Agreement will have no further effect and all releases and other commitments or obligations contained herein will be void. D. Dismissal of Claims. Provided that the conditions in Sections II.B and II.0 have been satisfied, the State of Washington shall file the Consent Judgment described in Section I.N of the Global Settlement and attached hereto as Exhibit G ("Washington Consent Judgment") with the King County Superior Court ("Washington Consent Judgment Court") on or before November 1, 2022. This Section II.C.2 supersedes the deadline for submitting a Consent Judgment set forth in Section VIII.B of the Global Settlement. In the event that the Court declines to enter the Washington Consent Judgment, each Settling Distributor shall be entitled to terminate the Agreement as to itself and shall be excused from all obligations under the Agreement, and if a Settling Distributor terminates the Agreement as to itself, all releases and other commitments or obligations contained herein with respect to that Settling Distributor will be null and void. The date of the entry of the Washington Consent Judgment shall be the effective date of this Agreement 2 Packet Pg. 229 8.9.a ("Washington Effective Date"). Within the later of forty-five (45) days after the Washington Effective Date or December 31, 2022, each Settling Distributor will certify to the State that all medical claims data provided to it during the litigation (including Medicaid, PMP, LNI claims, and PEBB data) has been destroyed by the party and its agents, including all retained experts. III. Participation by Subdivisions A. Notice. The Office of the State of Washington Attorney General in consultation with the Settling Distributors shall send individual notice of the opportunity to participate in this Agreement and the requirements for participation to all Subdivisions eligible to participate who have not returned an executed Subdivision Settlement Participation Form within fifteen (15) days of the execution of this Agreement. The Office of the State of Washington Attorney General may also provide general notice reasonably calculated to alert Subdivisions, including publication and other standard forms of notification. Nothing contained herein shall preclude the State of Washington from providing further notice to, or from contacting any of its Subdivision(s) about, becoming a Participating Subdivision. B. Trigger Date for Later Litigating Subdivisions. Notwithstanding Sections I.EE and I.GGGG of the Global Settlement, as to the State of Washington, Settling Distributors and the State of Washington agree to treat the Trigger Date for Primary Subdivisions as September 23, 2022 and the Trigger Date for all other Subdivisions as May 3, 2022. C. Initial and Later Participating Subdivisions. Notwithstanding Sections I.BB, I.CC, I.FF and Section VII.D and E of the Global Settlement, any Participating Subdivision in Washington that meets the applicable requirements for becoming a Participating Subdivision set forth in Section VII.B or Section VII.0 of the Global Settlement on or before September 23, 2022 shall be considered an Initial Participating Subdivision. Participating Subdivisions that are not Initial Participating Subdivisions but meet the applicable requirements for becoming Participating Subdivisions set forth in Section VII.B or Section VII.0 of the Global Settlement after September 23, 2022 shall be considered Later Participating Subdivisions. D. Subdivision Settlement Participation Forms. Each Subdivision Settlement Participation Form submitted by a Participating Subdivision from the State of Washington shall be materially identical to Exhibit F to this Agreement. Nothing in Exhibit F is intended to modify in any way either the terms of this Agreement or the terms of the Global Settlement, both of which the State of Washington and Participating Subdivisions agree to be bound. To the extent that any Subdivision Settlement Participation Form submitted by any Participating Subdivision is worded differently from Exhibit F to this Agreement or interpreted differently from the Global Agreement and this Agreement in any respect, the Global Agreement and this Agreement control. IV. Settlement Payments A. Schedule. Annual Payments under this Agreement shall be calculated as if the State of Washington were a Settling State under the Global Settlement and shall be made pursuant to the terms of Section IV of the Global Settlement except that, as to the State of Washington, the Payment Date for Payment Year 1 shall be December 1, 2022 and the Payment Date for Payment Packet Pg. 230 8.9.a Year 2 shall be December 1, 2022. For the avoidance of doubt, the sole component of the State of Washington's Annual Payment is the portion of the Net Abatement Amount allocated to the State of Washington under the Global Settlement ("Washington Abatement Amount"). The maximum possible Washington Abatement Amount is $430,249,769.02. B. Use of Payment. The Washington Abatement Amount paid under this Agreement shall be used as provided for in Section V of the Global Settlement. C. Nature of Payment. The State of Washington and its Participating Subdivisions agree that payments made to the State of Washington and its Participating Subdivisions under this Agreement are properly characterized as described in Section V.F of the Global Settlement. V. Plaintiffs' Attorneys' Fees and Costs A. Interaction with Global Settlement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Global Settlement, payments to cover attorneys' fees and costs under this Agreement ("Washington Fees and Costs") shall be made pursuant to this Section V. B. Amounts. The total amount to cover of all Washington Fees and Costs is $87,750,230.98. That total consists of the categories of attorneys' fees and costs set forth in this Section V.B and shall be paid on the schedule set forth in Section V.C. 1. State Outside and Inside Counsel Fees and Costs. Settling Distributors shall pay $76,829,316.21 to cover in-house fees and costs and outside counsel fees and costs to the Washington Attorney General's Office, which shall be used for any lawful purpose in the discharge of the Attorney General's duties at the sole discretion of the Attorney General. The amount shall be paid in increments as specified in Section V.0 (Payment Year 1 — 20%, Payment Year 2 — 20%, Payment Year 3 — 15%, Payment Year 4 — 15%, Payment Year 5 — 15%, Payment Year 6 — 10%, Payment Year 7— 5%.) 2. Fees and Costs for Participating Litigating Subdivisions' Attorney. Settling Distributors shall pay $10,920,914.70 to Participating Litigating Subdivisions' attorneys for fees and costs into a single account as directed by the Washington Attorney General's Office, which then shall be paid as agreed between the State of Washington and attorneys for Participating Litigating Subdivisions. Participating Litigating Subdivisions' attorneys shall be paid in accordance with the schedule in Section V.0 and V.D.5 of this Agreement. C. Schedule. Washington Fees and Costs shall be paid according to the following schedule: a. Payment Year 1: Twenty percent (20%) of the total Washington Fees and Costs amount ($17,550,046.20), to be paid on or before December 1, 2022. 2 Packet Pg. 231 8.9.a b. Payment Year 2: Twenty percent (20%) of the total Washington Fees and Costs amount ($17,550,046.20), to be paid on or before December 1, 2022. C. Payment Year 3: Fifteen percent (15%) of the total Washington Fees and Costs amount ($13,162,534.65), to be paid on or before July 15, 2023. d. Payment Year 4: Fifteen percent (15%) of the total Washington Fees and Costs amount ($13,162,534.65), to be paid on or before July 15, 2024. e. Payment Year 5: Fifteen percent (15%) of the total Washington Fees and Costs amount ($13,162,534.65), to be paid on or before July 15, 2025. f. Payment Year 6: Ten percent (10%) of the total Washington Fees and Costs amount ($8,775,023.10), to be paid on or before July 15, 2026. g. Payment Year 7: Five percent (5%) of the total Washington Fees and Costs amount ($4,387,511.55), to be paid on or before July 15, 2027. D. Remittance. So that Settling Distributors do not pay the same fees and costs under both the Global Settlement and this Agreement, Washington and its Participating Litigating Subdivisions and their respective counsel shall do as follows: 1. Participating Litigating Subdivisions in Washington and their counsel shall apply to the Attorney Fee Fund and the Litigating Subdivision Cost Fund created pursuant to Exhibit R of the Global Settlement for all fees, costs and expenses for which they may be eligible and shall instruct the Fee Panel and the Cost and Expense Fund Administrator to remit to Settling Distributors the full amount awarded to such Participating Litigating Subdivision, with each Settling Distributor receiving the percentage of that amount corresponding to the allocation set forth in Section IV.I of the Global Settlement. 2. Counsel for Participating Subdivisions shall instruct the Fee Panel created by the MDL Court pursuant to Exhibit R of the Global Settlement to remit to Settling Distributors the Contingency Fee Amount for their Participating Subdivisions in the State of Washington, with each Settling Distributor receiving the percentage of that amount corresponding to the allocation set forth in Section IV.I of the Global Settlement. 3. The State of Washington shall instruct the Fee Fund Administrator selected pursuant to Exhibit S of the Global Settlement that the Settling Distributors shall not pay the Fixed Amount for the State of Washington, and the State of Washington will not be eligible to receive funds from the State Outside Counsel Fee Fund under the Global Settlement. 4. The State of Washington shall submit documented costs, as provided for in Exhibit T of the Global Settlement, to the Global Settlement State Cost Fund created pursuant to Exhibit T of the Global Settlement for all costs and expenses for which it may be eligible and shall instruct the State Cost Fund Administrator to remit to Settling Distributors the full amount awarded to the State of Washington, with each Settling 5 Packet Pg. 232 8.9.a Distributor receiving the percentage of that amount corresponding to the allocation set forth in Section IV.I of the Global Settlement. 5. No Participating Litigating Subdivision shall receive any payment due under this Agreement, including but not limited to the portion of the Washington Abatement Amount allocable to the Participating Subdivision, until it and/or its outside counsel, as applicable, fulfill their obligations under Sections V.D. 1-2. VI. Release A. Scope. As of the Washington Effective Date, Section XI of the Global Settlement is fully binding on, and effective with respect to, all Releasors under this Agreement. Accordingly, as of the Washington Effective Date, the Released Entities are hereby released and forever discharged from all Released Claims of Releasors, including the State of Washington and its Participating Subdivisions. VII. Miscellaneous A. No Admission. The Settling Distributors do not admit liability, fault, or wrongdoing. Neither this Agreement nor the Washington Consent Judgment shall be considered, construed or represented to be (1) an admission, concession or evidence of liability or wrongdoing or (2) a waiver or any limitation of any defense otherwise available to the Settling Distributors. It is the understanding and intent of the Agreement Parties that no portion of the Agreement shall be entered into evidence in any other action against the Settling Distributors, among other reasons, because it is not relevant to such action. For the avoidance of any doubt, nothing herein shall prohibit a Settling Distributor from entering this Agreement into evidence in any litigation or arbitration concerning a Settling Distributor's right to coverage under an insurance contract. B. Tax Cooperation and Reporting. The State of Washington and its Participating Subdivisions will be bound by Section V.F and Section XIV.F of the Global Settlement, except (i) as set forth in the final sentence of this Section VII.B and (ii) that the State of Washington shall be its own Designated State and shall designate its own "appropriate official" within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.6050X-l(f)(1)(ii)(B) (the "Appropriate Official"). The IRS Forms 1098-F to be filed with respect to this Agreement are attached as Exhibit C, Exhibit D, and Exhibit E. The State of Washington and its Participating Subdivisions agree that any return, amended return, or written statement filed or provided pursuant to Section XIV.F.4 of the Global Settlement with respect to this Agreement, and any similar document, shall be prepared and filed in a manner consistent with reporting each Settling Distributor's portion of the aggregate amount of payments paid or incurred by the Settling Distributors hereunder as the "Total amount to be paid" pursuant to this Agreement in Box 1 of IRS Form 1098-F, each Settling Distributor's portion of the amount equal to the aggregate amount of payments paid or incurred by the Settling Distributors hereunder less the Compensatory Restitution Amount as the "Amount to be paid for violation or potential violation" in Box 2 of IRS Form 1098-F and each Settling Distributor's portion of the Compensatory Restitution Amount as "Restitution/remediation amount" in Box 3 of IRS Form 1098-F, as reflected in Exhibit C, Exhibit D, and Exhibit E. no Packet Pg. 233 8.9.a C. No Third -Party Beneficiaries. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, no portion of this Agreement shall provide any rights to, or be enforceable by, any person or entity that is not the State of Washington or a Released Entity. The State of Washington may not assign or otherwise convey any right to enforce any provision of this Agreement. D. Cooperation. Each Agreement Party and each Participating Subdivision agrees to use its best efforts and to cooperate with the other Agreement Parties and Participating Subdivisions to cause this Agreement to become effective, to obtain all necessary approvals, consents and authorizations, if any, and to execute all documents and to take such other action as may be appropriate in connection herewith. Consistent with the foregoing, each Agreement Party and each Participating Subdivision agrees that it will not directly or indirectly assist or encourage any challenge to this Agreement or the Washington Consent Judgment by any other person, and will support the integrity and enforcement of the terms of this Agreement and the Washington Consent Judgment. E. Enforcement. All disputes between Settling Distributors and the State of Washington and/or the Participating Subdivisions in the State of Washington shall be handled as specified in Section VI of the Global Settlement, including the referral of relevant disputes to the National Arbitration Panel. F. No Violations of Applicable Law. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to authorize or require any action by Settling Distributors in violation of applicable federal, state, or other laws. G. Modification. This Agreement may be modified by a written agreement of the Agreement Parties. For purposes of modifying this Agreement or the Washington Consent Judgment, Settling Distributors may contact the Washington Attorney General for purposes of coordinating this process. The dates and deadlines in this Agreement may be extended by written agreement of the Agreement Parties, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. H. No Waiver. Any failure by any Agreement Party to insist upon the strict performance by any other party of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement, and such party, notwithstanding such failure, shall have the right thereafter to insist upon the specific performance of any and all of the provisions of this Agreement. I. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the Global Settlement (and its exhibits), represents the full and complete terms of the settlement entered into by the Agreement Parties, except as provided herein. In any action undertaken by the Agreement Parties, no prior versions of this Agreement and no prior versions of any of its terms may be introduced for any purpose whatsoever. J. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and a facsimile or .pdf signature shall be deemed to be, and shall have the same force and effect as, an original signature. K. Notice. All notices or other communications under this Agreement shall be provided to the following via email and overnight delivery to: 7 Packet Pg. 234 8.9.a Copy to AmerisourceBergen Corporation's attorneys at: Michael T. Reynolds Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 825 8th Avenue New York, NY 10019 mreynolds@cravath.com Copy to Cardinal Health, Inc. 's attorneys at: Elaine Golin Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 51 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 epgolin@wlrk.com Copy to McKesson Corporation's attorneys at: Thomas J. Perrelli Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001-4412 TPerrelli@jenner.com Copy to the State of Washington at: Shane Esquibel Jeffrey Rupert Laura Clinton Washington Attorney General's Office 1125 Washington Street SE PO Box 40100 Olympia, WA 98504-0100 Shane.Esquibel@atg.wa.gov Jeffrey.Rupert@atg.wa.gov Laura.Clinton@atg.wa.gov [Signatures begin on next page.] 0 Packet Pg. 235 8.9.a Authorized and agreed to by: r-- Dated: ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General, State g� LIM Name: Title: Division Chief T Packet Pg. 236 8.9.a Authorized and agreed to by: Dated: May 2, 2022 AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION By: Elizabeth Campbell Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer Packet Pg. 237 8.9.a Authorized and agreed to by: Dated: 04/29/2022 CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. By: Name: Jessica Mayer Title: Chief Legal and Compliance Officer Packet Pg. 238 8.9.a Authorized and agreed to by: Dated: 4 Z! Z2' MCKESSON CORPORATION By: Name: Scxf-oat-JA C- Ora v Title: Qff rpe rak Packet Pg. 2379 8.9.a Exhibit A Primary Subdivisions2 No. Subdivision Name 1. Aberdeen city 2. Adams County 3. Anacortes City 4. Arlington City 5. Asotin County 6. Auburn City* 7. Bainbridge Island City 8. Battle Ground City 9. Bellevue City* 10. Bellingham City* 11. Benton County* 12. Bonney Lake City 13. Bothell City* 14. Bremerton City* 15. Burien City* 16. Camas City 17. Centralia City 18. Chelan County* 19. Cheney City 20. Clallam County* 21. Clark County* 22. Covington City 23. Cowlitz County* 24. Des Moines City* 25. Douglas County* 26. East Wenatchee City 27. Edgewood City 28. Edmonds City* 29. Ellensburg City 30. Enumclaw City 31. Everett City* 32. Federal Way City* 33. Ferndale City 34. Fife City 35. Franklin County* 36. Gig Harbor City 37. Grandview City 38. Grant County* 2 Entities denoted with an asterisk (*) indicate a population of greater than 30,000 for purposes of the definition of Primary Subdivision as it relates to Incentive Payment C. A-1 Packet Pg. 240 8.9.a 39. Grays Harbor County* 40. Island County* 41. Issaquah City* 42. Jefferson County* 43. Kelso City 44. Kenmore City 45. Kennewick City* 46. Kent City* 47. King County* 48. Kirkland City* 49. Kitsap County* 50. Kittitas County* 51. Klickitat County 52. Lacey City* 53. Lake Forest Park City 54. Lake Stevens City* 55. Lakewood City* 56. Lewis County* 57. Liberty Lake City 58. Lincoln County 59. Longview City* 60. Lynden City 61. Lynnwood City* 62. Maple Valley City 63. Marysville City* 64. Mason County* 65. Mercer Island City 66. Mill Creek City 67. Monroe City 68. Moses Lake City 69. Mount Vernon City* 70. Mountlake Terrace City 71. Mukilteo City 72. Newcastle City 73. Oak Harbor City 74. Okanogan County* 75. Olympia City* 76. Pacific County 77. Pasco City* 78. Pend Oreille County 79. Pierce County* 80. Port Angeles City 81. Port Orchard City 82. Poulsbo City 83. Pullman City* 84. Puyallup City* A-2 Packet Pg. 241 8.9.a 85. Redmond City* 86. Renton City* 87. Richland City* 88. Sammamish City* 89. San Juan County 90. Seatac City 91. Seattle City* 92. Sedro-Woolley City 93. Shelton City 94. Shoreline City* 95. Skagit County* 96. Skamania County 97. Snohomish City 98. Snohomish County* 99. Snoqualmie City 100. Spokane City* 101. Spokane County* 102. Spokane Valley City* 103. Stevens County* 104. Sumner City 105. Sunnyside City 106. Tacoma City* 107. Thurston County* 108. Tukwila City 109. Tumwater City 110. University Place City* 111. Vancouver City* 112. Walla Walla City* 113. Walla Walla County* 114. Washougal City 115. Wenatchee City* 116. West Richland City 117. Whatcom County* 118. Whitman County* 119. Woodinville City 120. Yakima City* 121. Yakima County* A-3 Packet Pg. 242 8.9.a Exhibit B Liti!ating Subdivisions No. Subdivision Name 1. Anacortes City 2. Bainbridge Island City 3. Burlington City 4. Chelan County 5. Clallam County 6. Clark County 7. Everett City 8. Franklin County 9. Island County 10. Jefferson County 11. Kent City 12. King County 13. Kirkland City 14. Kitsap County 15. Kittitas County 16. La Conner School District 17. Lakewood City 18. Lewis County 19. Lincoln County 20. Mount Vernon City 21. Mount Vernon School District 22. Olympia City 23. Pierce County 24. San Juan County 25. Seattle City 26. Sedro-Woolley City 27. Sedro-Woolley School District 28. Skagit County 29. Snohomish County 30. Spokane City 31. Spokane County 32. Tacoma City 33. Thurston County 34. Vancouver City 35. Walla Walla County 36. Whatcom County 37. Whitman County IM Packet Pg. 243 8.9.a Exhibit C ABC IRS Form 1098-F This Exhibit C will be appended to the Agreement prior to the Effective Date pursuant to Section VII.B. C-1 Packet Pg. 244 8.9.a Exhibit D Cardinal Health IRS Form 1098-F This Exhibit D will be appended to the Agreement prior to the Effective Date pursuant to Section VII.B. D-1 Packet Pg. 245 8.9.a Exhibit E McKesson IRS Form 1098-F This Exhibit E will be appended to the Agreement prior to the Effective Date pursuant to Section VII.B. E- I Packet Pg. 246 8.9.a Exhibit F Subdivision Settlement Participation Form Governmental Entity: State: Authorized Official: Address 1: Address 2: City, State, Zip: Phone: Email: The governmental entity identified above ("Governmental Entity"), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated May 2, 2022 ("Distributors Washington Settlement"), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Distributors Washington Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Distributors Washington Settlement, including the Distributor Global Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021 ("Global Settlement") attached to the Distributors Washington Settlement as Exhibit H, understands that all terms in this Participation Form have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by signing this Participation Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Distributors Washington Settlement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein. 2. The Governmental Entity shall, within 14 days of October 1, 2022 and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, secure the dismissal with prejudice of any Released Claims that it has filed. 4. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Distributors Washington Settlement pertaining to Subdivisions as defined therein. 5. By agreeing to the terms of the Distributors Washington Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after December 1, 2022. 6. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Distributors Washington Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein. 7. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the Washington Consent Judgment Court for purposes limited to that court's role as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the Distributors Washington Settlement. The Governmental Entity likewise agrees to arbitrate before the National Arbitration Panel as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent otherwise provided in the Distributors Washington Settlement. F-1 Packet Pg. 247 8.9.a 8. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Distributors Washington Settlement as provided therein. 9. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Distributors Washington Settlement, including, but not limited to, all provisions of Section XI of the Global Settlement, and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Distributors Washington Settlement are intended by the Agreement Parties to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Distributors Washington Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim. 10. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision as set forth in the Distributors Washington Settlement. 11. In connection with the releases provided for in the Distributors Washington Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads: General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, and that if known by him or her would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party. A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Released Claims, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the date the Distributors Washington Settlement becomes effective pursuant to Section II.B of the Distributors Washington Settlement, any and all Released Claims that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities' decision to participate in the Distributors Washington Settlement. F-2 Packet Pg. 248 8.9.a 12. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Distributors Washington Settlement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Participation Form is worded differently from Exhibit F to the Distributors Washington Settlement or interpreted differently from the Distributors Washington Settlement in any respect, the Distributors Washington Settlement controls. I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Participation Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity. Signature: Name: Title: Date: F-3 Packet Pg. 249 8.9.a Exhibit G Consent Judgment and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice The Honorable Michael Ramsey Scott Trial Date: November 15, 2021 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, 0 MCKESSON CORPORATION, CARDINAL HEALTH INC., and AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, Defendants. NO. 19-2-06975-9 SEA FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE The State of Washington ("State") and McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and AmerisourceBergen Corporation, together with the subsidiaries thereof (collectively, the "Settling Distributors," and each a "Settling Distributor") (together with the State, the "Parties," and each a "Party") have entered into a consensual resolution of the above -captioned litigation (the "Action") pursuant to a settlement agreement entitled Distributors Washington Settlement Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2022 (the "Washington Agreement"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Washington Agreement shall become effective by its terms upon the entry of this Final Consent Judgment (the "Judgment") by the Court without adjudication of any contested issue of fact or law, and without finding or admission of wrongdoing or liability of any kind. By entering into the Washington Agreement, the State of Washington agrees to be bound by all terms and conditions G-1 Packet Pg. 250 8.9.a of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2021 (as subsequently updated) (the "Global Agreement"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B (together with the Washington Agreement, the "Agreements") unless stated otherwise in the Washington Agreement. Unless stated otherwise in the Washington Agreement, the terms of the Washington Agreement are intended to be consistent with the terms of the Global Settlement and shall be construed accordingly. I. RECITALS: 1. Each Party warrants and represents that it engaged in arm's-length negotiations in good faith. In hereby executing the Agreements, the Parties intend to effect a good -faith settlement. 2. The State has determined that the Agreements are in the public interest. 3. The Settling Distributors deny the allegations against them and that they have any liability whatsoever to the State, its Subdivisions, and/or (a) any of the State's or Subdivisions' departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, including its Attorney General, and any person in his or her official capacity whether elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, (b) any public entities, public instrumentalities, public educational institutions, unincorporated districts, fire districts, irrigation districts, and other Special Districts, and (c) any person or entity acting in a parens patriae, sovereign, quasi - sovereign, private attorney general, qui tam, taxpayer, or other capacity seeking relief on behalf of or generally applicable to the general public. 4. The Parties recognize that the outcome of the Action is uncertain and a final resolution through the adversarial process likely will require protracted litigation. 5. The Parties agree to the entry of the injunctive relief terms pursuant to Exhibit P of the Global Agreement. 6. Therefore, without any admission of liability or wrongdoing by the Settling Distributors or any other Released Entities (as defined in the Global Agreement), the Parties now mutually consent to the entry of this Judgment and agree to dismissal of the claims with prejudice pursuant G-2 Packet Pg. 251 8.9.a to the terms of the Agreements to avoid the delay, expense, inconvenience, and uncertainty of protracted litigation. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: In consideration of the mutual promises, terms, and conditions set forth in the Agreements, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by all Parties, it is agreed by and between the Settling Distributors and the State, and adjudicated by the Court, as follows: 1. The foregoing Recitals are incorporated herein and constitute an express term of this Judgment. 2. The Parties have entered into a full and final settlement of all Released Claims of Releasors against the Settling Distributors (including but not limited to the State) and the Released Entities pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreements. 3. The "Definitions" set forth in Section I of the Global Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Judgment. The State is a "Settling State" within the meaning of the Global Agreement. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms in this Judgment shall have the same meaning given to them in the Global Agreement, or, if not defined in the Global Agreement, the same meaning given to them in the Washington Agreement. 4. The Parties agree that the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over the Parties with respect to the Action and this Judgment. This Judgment shall not be construed or used as a waiver of any jurisdictional defense the Settling Distributors or any other Released Entity may raise in any other proceeding. 5. The Court finds that the Agreements were entered into in good faith. 6. The Court finds that entry of this Judgment is in the public interest and reflects a negotiated settlement agreed to by the Parties. The Action is dismissed with prejudice, subject to a retention of jurisdiction by the Court as provided herein and in the Agreements. G-3 Packet Pg. 252 8.9.a 7. By this Judgment, the Agreements are hereby approved by the Court, and the Court hereby adopts their terms as its own determination of this matter and the Parties' respective rights and obligations. 8. The Court shall have authority to resolve disputes identified in Section VI.F.1 of the Global Agreement, governed by the rules and procedures of the Court. 9. The Parties have satisfied the Conditions to Effectiveness of Agreement set forth in Section II.B of the Washington Agreement as follows: a. The Enforcement Committee and the Settling Distributors executed the Enforcement Committee Agreement by June 1, 2022. b. All Litigating Subdivisions in the State of Washington and ninety percent (90%) of Non -Litigating Primary Subdivisions (calculated by population pursuant to the Global Settlement) in the State of Washington became Participating Subdivisions by September 23, 2022. 10. The Parties have satisfied the Condition to Effectiveness of Agreement set forth in Section VIII of the Global Agreement and the Release set forth in Sections XI.A, F, and G of the Global Agreement, as follows: a. The Attorney General of the State exercised the fullest extent of his or her powers to release the Settling Distributors and all other Released Entities from all Released Claims pursuant to the release attached hereto as Exhibit C (the "AG Release"). b. The Settling Distributors have determined that there is sufficient State participation and sufficient resolution of the Claims of the Litigating Subdivisions in the Settling States to proceed with the Agreements. C. The Participation Form for each Initial Participating Subdivision in the State has been delivered to the Settling Distributors. As stated in the Participation Form, and for the avoidance of doubt, nothing in the Participation Form executed by the Participating Subdivisions is intended to modify in any way the terms of the G-4 Packet Pg. 253 8.9.a Agreements to which the Participating Subdivisions agree. As stated in the Participation Form, to the extent the executed version of the Participation Form differs from the Global Agreement in any respect, the Global Agreement controls. d. Pursuant to Section VIII.B of the Global Agreement, each Participating Subdivision in the State is dismissing with prejudice any Released Claims that it has filed against the Settling Distributors and the Released Entities. 11. Release. The Parties acknowledge that the AG Release, which is incorporated by reference herein, is an integral part of this Judgment. Pursuant to the Agreements and the AG Release and without limitation and to the maximum extent of the power of the State's Attorney General, the Settling Distributors and the other Released Entities are, as of the Effective Date, hereby released from any and all Released Claims of (a) the State and its Participating Subdivisions and any of their departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, Subdivisions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, including the State's Attorney General, and any person in his or her official capacity whether elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing, and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, (b) any public entities, public instrumentalities, public educational institutions, unincorporated districts, fire districts, irrigation districts, and other Special Districts in the State, and (c) any person or entity acting in a parens patriae, sovereign, quasi -sovereign, private attorney general, qui tam, taxpayer, or other capacity seeking relief on behalf of or generally applicable to the general public with respect to the State or any Subdivision in the State, whether or not any of them participate in the Agreements. Pursuant to the Agreements and the AG Release and to the maximum extent of the State's power, the Settling Distributors and the other Released Entities are, as of the Effective Date, hereby released from any and all Released Claims of (1) the State, (2) all past and present executive departments, state agencies, divisions, boards, commissions and instrumentalities with the regulatory authority to enforce state and federal controlled substances acts, and (3) any of the State's past and present executive departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions and instrumentalities that have the authority to bring Claims related to Covered Conduct seeking G-5 Packet Pg. 254 8.9.a money (including abatement and/or remediation) or revocation of a pharmaceutical distribution license. For the purposes of clause (3) above, executive departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, and instrumentalities are those that are under the executive authority or direct control of the State's Governor. Further, the provisions set forth in Section XI of the Global Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Judgment as if fully set forth herein. The Parties acknowledge, and the Court finds, that those provisions are an integral part of the Agreements and this Judgment, and shall govern the rights and obligations of all participants in the settlement. Any modification of those rights and obligations may be made based only on a writing signed by all affected parties and approved by the Court. 12. Release of Unknown Claims. The State expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads: General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party. 13. The State may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Released Claims, but the State expressly waived and fully, finally, and forever settled, released and discharged, through the Agreements and AG Release, any and all Released Claims that may exist as of the Effective Date but which the State does not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would have materially affected the State's decision to enter into the Agreements. 14. Costs and Fees. The Parties will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees except as otherwise provided in the Agreements. w: Packet Pg. 255 8.9.a 15. No Admission of Liability. The Settling Distributors are consenting to this Judgment solely for the purpose of effectuating the Agreements, and nothing contained herein may be taken as or construed to be an admission or concession of any violation of law, rule, or regulation, or of any other matter of fact or law, or of any liability or wrongdoing, all of which the Settling Distributors expressly deny. None of the Settling Distributors or any other Released Entity admits that it caused or contributed to any public nuisance, and none of the Settling Distributors or any other Released Entity admits any wrongdoing that was or could have been alleged by the State, its Participating Subdivisions, or any other person or entity. No part of this Judgment shall constitute evidence of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing by the Settling Distributors or any other Released Entity. The Parties acknowledge that payments made under the Agreements are not a fine, penalty, or payment in lieu thereof and are properly characterized as described in Section V.F of the Global Agreement. 16. No Waiver. This Judgment is entered based on the Agreements without adjudication of any contested issue of fact or law or finding of liability of any kind. This Judgment shall not be construed or used as a waiver of any Settling Distributor's right, or any other Released Entity's right, to defend itself from, or make any arguments in, any other regulatory, governmental, private individual, or class claims or suits relating to the subject matter or terms of this Judgment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the State may enforce the terms of this Judgment as expressly provided in the Agreements. 17. No Private Right of Action. This Judgment is not intended for use by any third party for any purpose, including submission to any court for any purpose, except pursuant to Section VI.A of the Global Agreement. Except as expressly provided in the Agreements, no portion of the Agreements or this Judgment shall provide any rights to, or be enforceable by, any person or entity that is not a Settling State or Released Entity. The State shall allow Participating Subdivisions in the State to notify it of any perceived violations of the Agreements or this Judgment. No Settling State, including the State of Washington, may assign or otherwise convey any right to enforce any provision of the Agreements. G-7 Packet Pg. 256 8.9.a 18. Admissibility. It is the intent of the Parties that this Judgment not be admissible in other cases against the Settling Distributors or binding on the Settling Distributors in any respect other than in connection with the enforcement of this Judgment or the Agreements. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing herein shall prohibit a Settling Distributor from entering this Judgment or the Agreements into evidence in any litigation or arbitration concerning (1) a Settling Distributor's right to coverage under an insurance contract or (2) the enforcement of the releases provided for by the Agreements and this Judgment. 19. Preservation of Privilege. Nothing contained in the Agreements or this Judgment, and no act required to be performed pursuant to the Agreements or this Judgment, is intended to constitute, cause, or effect any waiver (in whole or in part) of any attorney -client privilege, work product protection, or common interest/joint defense privilege, and each Party agrees that it shall not make or cause to be made in any forum any assertion to the contrary. 20. Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that the Agreements were negotiated on an arm's-length basis between parties of equal bargaining power and was drafted jointly by counsel for each Party. Accordingly, the Agreements are incorporated herein by reference and shall be mutually interpreted and not construed in favor of or against any Party, except as expressly provided for in the Agreements. 21. Retention of Jurisdiction. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of the Parties for the limited purpose of the resolution of disputes identified in Section VI.F.1 of the Global Agreement. The Court shall have jurisdiction over Participating Subdivisions in the State for the limited purposes identified in the Agreements. 22. Successors and Assigns. This Judgment is binding on each of the Settling Distributor's successors and assigns. 23. Modification. This Judgment shall not be modified (by the Court, by any other court, or by any other means) without the consent of the State and the Settling Distributors, or as provided for in Section XIV.0 of the Global Agreement. Packet Pg. 257 8.9.a So ORDERED this day of 2022. THE HONORABLE JUDGE MICHAEL. R. SCOTT APPROVED, AGREED TO AND PRESENTED BY: ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General s/ MARTHA RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ, WSBA No. 35466 ANDREW R.W. HUGHES, WSBA No. 49515 NATHAN K. BAYS, WSBA No. 43025 BRIAN H. ROWE, WSBA No. 56817 SPENCER W. COATES, WSBA No. 49683 KELSEY E. ENDRES, WSBA No. 39409 LAURA K. CLINTON, WSBA No. 29846 JONATHAN J. GUSS, WSBA No. 57663 SUSAN E. LLORENS, WSBA No. 38049 LIA E. PERNELL, WSBA No. 50208 MOTLEY RICE LLC s/ LINDA SINGER, pro hac vice ELIZABETH SMITH, pro hac vice DAVID I. ACKERMAN, pro hac vice JAMES LEDLIE, pro hac vice DON MIGLIORI, pro hac vice REBECCA FONSECA, pro hac vice MICHAEL J. QUIRK, pro hac vice ANNIE KOUBA, pro hac vice MICHAEL J. PENDELL, pro hac vice CHRISTOPHER MORIARTY, pro hac vice LISA M. SALTZBURG, pro hac vice NATALIA DEYNEKA, pro hac vice MICHAEL E. ELSNER, pro hac vice ANDREW P. ARNOLD, pro hac vice MIMI LIU, pro hac vice STOEL RIVES LLP s/ VANESSA SORIANO POWER, WSBA No. 30777 JENNA M. POLIGO, WSBA No. 54466 RACHEL C. LEE, WSBA No. 48245 S. JULIA LITTELL, WSBA No. 54106 PER RAMFJORD, pro hac vice CHRIS C. RIFER, pro hac vice WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP s/ LORYN HELFMANN, pro hac vice A. JOSHUA PODOLL, pro hac vice SUZANNE SALGADO, pro hac vice NEELUM J. WADHWANI, pro hac vice PAUL E. BOEHM, pro hac vice ELEANOR J.G. WASSERMAN, pro hac vice DAVID J. PARK, pro hac vice JOSHUA D. TULLY, pro hac vice STEVEN PYSER, pro hac vice ENU A. MAINIGI, pro hac vice JENNIFER G. WICHT, pro hac vice JOSEPH S. BUSHUR, pro hac vice COLLEEN MCNAMARA, pro hac vice MATTHEW P. MOONEY, pro hac vice ASHLEY W. HARDIN, pro hac vice J. ANDREW KEYES, pro hac vice EMILY R. PISTILLI, pro hac vice BRAD MASTERS, pro hac vice CAS Packet Pg. 258 8.9.a ANN RITTER, pro hac vice WILLIAM F. HAWKINS, pro hac vice SARA AGUINGUA, pro hac vice DAVID BURNETT, pro hac vice Attorneys for Defendant Cardinal Health Inc. VINCENT GREENE, pro hac vice Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Washington GORDON TILDEN THOMAS & CORDELL LLP FRANKLIN D. CORDELL, WSBA No. 26392 JEFFREY M. THOMAS, WSBA No. 21175 KASEY HUEBNER, WSBANo. 32890 COVINGTON & BURLING CHISTOPHER EPPICH, pro hac vice ANDREW STANNER, pro hac vice KEVIN KELLY, pro hac vice AMBER CHARLES, pro hac vice MEGHAN MONAGHAN, pro hac vice ISAAC CHAPUT, pro hac vice DANIEL EAGLES, pro hac vice MEGAN MCLAUGHLIN, pro hac vice DEVON L. MOBLEY RITTER, pro hac vice MEGAN RODGERS, pro hac vice SONYA D. WINNER, pro hac vice CLAYTON L. BAILEY, pro hac vice JAMES A. GOOLD, pro hac vice EMILY KVESELIS, pro hac vice PAUL W. SCHMIDT, pro hac vice ALEXANDER SETZEPFANDT, pro hac vice CHRISTIAN J. PISTILLI, pro hac vice LAUREN DORRIS, pro hac vice NICHOLAS GRIEPSMA, pro hac vice ALISON DICIURCIO, pro hac vice SARA J. DENNIS, pro hac vice PHYLLIS A. JONES, pro hac vice DALE A. RICE, pro hac vice Attorneys for Defendant McKesson Corp. LANE POWELL PC s/ JOHN S. DEVLIN III, WSBA No. 23988 PILAR FRENCH, WSBA No. 33300 REED SMITH LLP G-10 Packet Pg. 259 8.9.a ROBERT A. NICHOLAS, pro hac vice KIM M. WATTERSON, pro hac vice STEVEN BORANIAN, pro hac vice ELIZABETH BRANDON, pro hac vice Attorneys for Defendant AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and AmerisourceBergen Corporation G-11 Packet Pg. 260 8.9.a DECLARATION OF SERVICE I declare that I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be electronically served using the Court's Electronic Filing System, which will serve a copy of this document upon all counsel of record. CARDINAL Vanessa S. Power, Atty vanessa. ower stoel.com Jenna Poli o, Atty jenna.poligo(&,stoel.com Per A. Ramfjord, Atty per.ramfjordAstoel.com Rachel C. Lee, Atty rachel.lee stoel.com Christopher C. Rifer, Atty christopher.rifer@stoel.com Loryn Helfmann, Atty Ihelfinann@wc.com A. Joshua Podoll, Atty apodoll@wc.com Suzanne Salgado, Atty ssalgado@wc.com Neelum J. Wadhwani, Atty nwadhwani wc.com Paul E. Boehm, Atty pboehm@wc.com Eleanor J. G. Wasserman, Atty easserman wc.com David J. Park, Atty dpark@wc.com Joshua D. Tully, Atty jtullypwc.com Steven P ser, Atty spyserAwc.com Enu A. Maini i, Atty emainigi@wc.com Jennifer G. Wicht, Atty jwicht(&wc.com Joseph S. Bushur, Atty jbushurAwc.com Colleen McNamara, Atty cmcnamara wc.com Ashley W. Hardin, Atty ahardin@wc.com J. Andrew Keyes, Atty akeyes@wc.com Emily R. Pistilli, Atty epistilli@wc.com William F. Hawkins, Atty whawkins@wc.com Stoel Docketing docketclerk stoel.com Leslie Lomax, Legal Assistant leslie.lomax stoel.com WA Action cardinalwashin tonaction wc.com MCKESSON Franklin D. Cordell fcordell ordontilden.com Jeffrey M. Thomas jthomasggordontilden.com Kasey Huebner khuebner ordontilden.com Christopher Eppich, Atty ceppichAcov.com Andrew Stanner, Atty astanner cov.com Kevin Kelly, Atty kkellyAcov.com Amber Charles, Atty acharles cov.com Me han Monaghan, Atty mmona han cov.com Isaac Cha ut, Atty icha ut cov.com Daniel Eagles, Atty dea les cov.com Megan McLaughlin, Atty mmclau hlin cov.com Devon L. Mobley -Ritter, Atty dmobleyritterAcov.com Megan Rodgers, Atty mrod ers cov.com Sonya D. Winner, Atty swinner cov.com Clayton L. Bailey, Aft cbaile cov.com G-12 Packet Pg. 261 8.9.a James A. Goold, Atty igoold@cov.com Emily Kveselis, Atty eveselis cov.com Paul W. Schmidt, Atty pschmidt(&,cov.com Alexander Setze fandt, Atty asetze fandt cov.com Christian J. Pistilli, Atty c istilli cov.com Lauren Dorris, Atty ldorris cov.com Nicholas Grie sma, Atty ngriepsmaAcov.com Alison DiCiurcio, Atty adiciurcio cov.com Sara J. Dennis, Atty sdennis cov.com Phyllis A. Jones, Atty pajones@cov.com Dale A. Rice, Atty drice@cov.com Nicole Antoine, Atty nantoine@cov.com Timothy Hester, Atty thester@cov.com Gregory L. Halperin, Atty ghalperin@cov.com Stephen Petkis, Atty s etkis cov.com Alice Phillips Atty a hilli s cov.com Ellen Evans, Legal Assistant eevansAgordontilden.com Jacqueline Lucien Legal Assistant jlucienggordontilden.com Courtney Caryl Garth, Paralegal ccar 1 ordontilden.com Electronic Mailing Inbox mckessonwa cov.com AMERISOURCEBERGEN Pilar French, Aft frenchpglanepowell.com John S. Devlin III, Atty devlin' lane owell.com Katie Bass, Atty bassk lane owell.com Elizabeth Brandon, Atty ebrandon reedsmith.com Sarah Johansen, Atty s'ohansen reedsmith.com Rachel B. Weil, Atty rweil reedsmith.com Steven Boranian, Atty sboranian reedsmith.com Adam D. Brownrout, Atty abrownrout reedsmith.com Nicole S. Soussan, Atty nsoussan reedsmith.com Brian T. Himmel, Atty bhimmel reedsmith.com Shannon E. McClure, Atty smcclure reedsmith.com Michael J. Salimbene, Atty msalimbene reedsmith.com Robert A. Nicholas, Atty micholas reedsmith.com Thomas H. Suddath, Jr., Atty tsuddath reedsmith.com Thomas J. McGarri le, Atty tmc arri le reedsmith.com Courtland C. Chillingworth, Atty cchillin orth reedsmith.com Christina M. Vitale, Atty cvitale reedsmith.com Brian T. Kiolbasa, Atty kiolbasab lane owell.com Abigail M. Pierce, Atty abi ail. fierce reedsmith.com Joseph Mahad , Atty jmahady(q-,)reedsmith.com Jeffrey R. Melton, Atty jmeltongreedsmith.com Anne E. Rollins, Atty arollins reedsmith.com Eric J. Buhr, Atty ebuhr reedsmith.com Brent R. Gary, Atty b a reedsmith.com Kim M. Watterson, Aft KWatterson reedsmith.com Jeffrey M. Weimer, Aft JWeimer reedsmith.com E-Mailbox Docketin -SEA lane owell.com E-Mailbox Docketin -PDX lane owell.com E-Mailbox ABDCWA LanePowell.com E `0 U- c 0 0 a .2 r- 0 a c m E as as Cn 'o Q 0 W as as N N 0 N N to L c d E z a c as E d d Co 'o 0 c as E Q G-13 Packet Pg. 262 8.9.a DATED day of 2022, at Seattle, Washington. s_/ ANDREW R.W. HUGHES, WSBA No. 49515 G-14 Packet Pg. 263 8.9.a [See attachment.] Exhibit H Distributor Global Settlement Agreement E L O LL C M Q. .2 r- M IL c m E a� m Cn 'o Q O a� c m m V V N N O N N O L d E t V Q d E d d Co .O Q O d E t Q H-1 Packet Pg. 264 8.10 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Employment Agreement - Executive Assistant to City Council Staff Lead: Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History The City Council may, pursuant to ECC 2.03.010, hire a contract employee on an annual basis to serve as its Executive Assistant. The contract is to provide for the delegation by the Mayor of the day-to-day employment direction of this individual to the City Council President. For 2022, the Council contracted with two individuals to job share the position of Executive Assistant. Recently, however, one of those individuals has had a change in life circumstances that necessitated her departure. The other individual is willing to move to a full-time position if the City Council agrees to certain changes to the terms of the Executive Assistant's Employment Agreement. Staff Recommendation Approve the attached Employment Agreement - Executive Assistant to City Council on consent agenda. Narrative Rebecca Black Peterson has agreed to move into a full-time position as Executive Assistant to the City Council if the terms of the attached Employment Agreement meet with the City Council's approval. The proposed Employment Agreement was reviewed by the PSPP Committee on 6/14/22 and the Committee's suggested revisions have been incorporated into the version attached here for Council approval. Attachments: FINAL Employment Agreement - CC Executive Assistant - Rebecca Black Peterson 6.15.2022 (clean) Packet Pg. 265 8.10.a EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT c EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL E as as L WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "City a Council") utilizes the services of an Executive Assistant to perform a variety of confidential tasks related to its legislative and research functions; and E 0 0. WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Edmonds is by state statute the chief E administrative officer of the City, invested with the power to hire and fire employees and w to direct their day-to-day activities; and c WHEREAS, in the interest of fostering an appropriate working relationship between the Executive Assistant and the City Council, the Mayor has evidenced his wish to delegate the day-to-day responsibility for the direction of said employee to the City Council's President; and WHEREAS, with the Mayor's consent, the City Council wishes to fill the position of Executive Assistant with an employee specifically answerable to the Council, under specific, limited terms and conditions governed by the provisions of this employment agreement and not subject to the general personnel policies of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Edmonds, Washington and Rebecca Black Peterson (hereinafter "Employee") do hereby enter into this agreement for employment services ("Agreement"). The Employee's employment will be governed exclusively by the provisions of this Agreement unless otherwise provided herein. 1. Term of Employment: This Agreement will take effect as of the effective date set forth below and will expire on January 31, 2023 unless extended pursuant to its terms. Thereafter, this Agreement may be extended for an unlimited number of terms of one (1) calendar year duration at the sole discretion of the City Council. The purpose of this term is to permit an annual review of the performance of the Employee by the outgoing City Council President in order that the City Council President may determine whether or not it is appropriate to renew this Agreement for an additional term. It is one of the basic understandings of this Agreement that the Employee will work closely with the City Council President and the City Council. As such, this position will be one in which the confidence of the City Council President and City Council will be essential to the proper performance of the Employee's duties. Therefore, the City Council reserves the right not to renew this Agreement, or to terminate this Agreement as herein provided in order to preserve that confidence and a feeling of confidentiality between the City Council President, the City Council and the Employee as Executive Assistant. 2. Duties: The Employee will serve as the Executive Assistant for the City Council and complete legislative research when requested by Council. The Employee will be under the general day-to-day direction of the City Council President and will provide such assistance as may be necessary to individual members of the City Council. In the event of a conflict in direction between Council members, the Employee will rely upon Packet Pg. 266 ►4 8.10.a 2022 Employment Agreement Executive Assistant to City Council the direction of the City Council President. A generalized description of the duties of this c position is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. The E listing of duties in Exhibit A is intended as a descriptive tool only, and will not limit the 2 City Council President or City Council to make task assignments; provided, however, a that such duties be linked to the City Council President's Office and the legislative function of the City Council and will, in all respects, be governed by statutory, E constitutional and ordinance limitations on the duties of public employees. The City o 0. Council President, by her signature below, specifically represents that the Mayor has E delegated his statutory authority to direct the day-to-day duties of this Employee to the w City Council to be exercised by and through the City Council President. This delegation is revocable by the Mayor and will not be binding on the subsequent elected or appointed mayors unless ratified by them. N 3. Hours of Work: This is a full-time position. The Employee will work office hours as assigned and directed by the City Council through the City Council President. Such hours may normally be worked Monday through Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., with any appropriate meal and rest periods as required by law. In addition, the Employee may perform assigned work off site. Such hours will be within prescribed limits and approved by the City Council President. It is anticipated that the Employee will work up to 40 hours per week to successfully perform the required work. This general description of working hours will not limit the ability of the City Council President to change the working schedule or adjust it from time to time. 4. Wages and Benefits: The wages set forth in this Section 4 hereby provide for a base rate of $38.36 per hour, which is Step I of pay range NR-33. The Employee will move through this pay range per the non -represented employee compensation policy. The Employee will progress to Step 2 after six (6) months of employment, which will include the time the Employee has spent working for the City under her previous Employment Agreement, making the Step 2 progression date September 1, 2022. Thereafter, additional step progressions will take place on January I of each year. In addition, the Employee will receive any annual COLA that the Council chooses to give non -represented employees. The City will pay the applicable employer's portion of Medicare, PERS retirement, Municipal Employee Benefit Trust (MEBT), Washington State Industrial Taxes, and such other payments or benefits as may be required under the provisions of state and federal law based upon the number of hours worked. MEBT benefits will be provided as required by law or by the provisions of a plan document. "Plan Document" will mean for the purposes of this Agreement the MEBT or other contract, or policy documents, which require, by their terms, the participation of all qualified employees. The benefits to be paid to the Employee will be governed solely by this Agreement. No benefit not specifically addressed or listed herein will be granted to the Employee. The provisions of this Agreement will control over any conflicting provision of the City ordinances, City Personnel Policy Manual, any collective bargaining agreement or any other general grant of benefits to City employees. The benefits which the Employee will receive are limited to the following: Packet Pg. 267 3 8.10.a 2022 Employment Agreement Executive Assistant to City Council 4.1 Insurance Benefits: The City will allow the Employee to participate in the City's c group employee insurance programs listed below. The City will pay the insurance E premiums in accordance with the following schedule: 2 a� a INSURANCE BENEFIT/PREMIUM PAID c *Dental (WDS) family coverage / 90% E *Vision / 90% o *Medical / 90% a E Medicare /As per Federal law w Industrial Accident /As per State law Public Employees Retirement /As per State law Unemployment Insurance /As per State law N MEBT /As per City ordinance c *NOTE: The City pays 90% of the health insurance premium costs for a 100% full-time employee (working 40 hours per week). This percentage may be adjusted according to hours worked below 40 hours per week. The City will allow the Employee to use payroll deduction (Premium Only Plan) to pay for the Employee's cost of the above -listed insurance benefits. The City's payment is contingent on the Employee's qualification for such insurance program in accordance with Plan Documents and does not constitute an obligation to pay a sum in lieu of insurance or premium. 4.2 Vacation: Annual vacation is earned at the rate of 7.33 hours per month (to be otherwise pro -rated if the employee works under 40 hours per week). Earned vacation can be carried over into the next calendar year, provided the amount carried over does not exceed 176 hours total at the end of the duration of the contract. Unused, accrued vacation will be paid upon termination of employment. 4.3 Sick Leave: Sick leave is earned at the rate of 96 hours per year which is 8 hours per month and will be loaded to the employee's sick leave bank in the amount of 4 hours per pay period (to be otherwise pro -rated if the employee works under 40 hours per week). Earned sick leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 500 hours. Unused, accrued sick leave will be forfeited upon termination of employment. 4.4 Holiday Pay: The employee will receive pay for all holidays during which City offices are closed (to be otherwise pro -rated if the employee works under 40 hours per week). 5. Confidentiality: One of the basic purposes of this Agreement is to provide an employee who serves in a confidential capacity to the City Council and its City Council President. The Employee acknowledges that she has been informed of the necessity for confidentiality and understands that she will report directly to the City Council President any matter which she feels would breach such confidence or confidentiality. In the event of any apparent conflict between the needs of the City Council and that of the City in general, the Employee will report such matter to the City Council President and rely on Packet Pg. 268 8.10.a 4 2022 Employment Agreement Executive Assistant to City Council his/her direction. In keeping with this confidential relationship, the Executive Assistant c position will not be a part of a collective bargaining unit or subject to any collective E bargaining agreement. L a� a 6. Termination of Agreement: The parties acknowledge that this employment agreement creates an at -will employment relationship that may be terminated at any time, E with or without cause, by either party. This paragraph will control and supersede any o 0. portion of this Agreement that might otherwise be construed as in any way altering the E Employee's at -will status. 7. Indemnification: As an employee of the City, the Employee will have the right to indemnification by and on behalf of the City for actions taken in the scope of her employment in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2.06 of the Edmonds City Code as same exists or is hereafter amended. 8. Entire Written Agreement: This document represents the entire agreement, written or oral, between the parties. No representation or other oral agreement by either party will survive the execution of this document. This document will be amended only upon the express written agreement of both parties. The City Council President will confer with the Mayor regarding any change. 9. Severability: The provisions of this Agreement will be severable. In the event that any provision hereof is held to be void, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will survive; PROVIDED, however, that in the event the provisions of paragraph 5, relating to the exclusion of this position from any collective bargaining unit, or of paragraph 6, relating to this Agreement as one of at -will employment, are/is held to be unenforceable, invalid, or void, this Agreement will immediately be at an end. 10. Effective Date: The effective date of this Agreement will be the date set forth below. DONE THIS day of June 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS: Vivian Olson, City Council President EMPLOYEE: Rebecca Black Peterson Packet Pg. 269 5 8.10.a 2022 Employment Agreement Executive Assistant to City Council EXHIBIT A E EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT a Scope of Work/Position Duties as E POSITION PURPOSE: Provides public contact and complex clerical/administrative ° Q. and research support to the Council. Plans and performs complex administrative office w coordination to assures smooth, timely and efficient office operations for the department or assigned office; researches, collects, analyzes and compiles data and information for inclusion in reports; maintains records, files and budgets related to departmental °; operations, programs and expenditures. ry ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Researches, collects and analyzes background data on pending legislative matters as requested. • Schedules meetings for Council and individual Council members; prepares agenda memos for Council. • Attends Council meetings as needed, prepares requested reports, minutes, agendas, correspondence and other materials as appropriate and according to decisions and approved actions. • Assists Council President in drafting budget and planning of various Council events and functions including coordinating arrangements for meeting facilities, equipment and refreshments as appropriate; coordinates management of legislative priorities with Council President. • Coordinates and prepares press releases for Council as requested and/or various community relations. • Plans and performs complex administrative office coordination; relieves the Council President of technical clerical and administrative duties having Council - wide impact. • Completes PSR's for the department, enters payroll into the City's financial accounting software for the department and processes Council accounts payables. • Performs various administrative duties including answering telephones and greeting visitors; provides information in person or on the telephone or refers to appropriate department personnel; opens, screens and routes mail. • Maintains calendars relating to Council events as requested; schedules appointments and conferences; assists with travel reservations and vehicle check - in and checkout for Council as requested. Packet Pg. 270 6 8.10.a 2022 Employment Agreement Executive Assistant to City Council • Composes, prepares and types a variety of correspondence, memos, reports and other materials and proofreads materials to assure accuracy and completeness. • Administers and oversees contracts, Interlocal Agreements and other agreements entered into by the City Council. • Organizes and coordinates office functions, activities and communications; assures efficient workflow and office operations. • Must be able to work independently under direction of Council President to complete assignments. • Maintains accurate financial records and files pertaining to departmental expenditures, budget balances and operations; prepares status reports, charts and other documents as requested; prepares and coordinates purchase of office supplies, equipment and other expenditures. • Manages and maintains all records as required by State and Federal law; including, but not limited to, records related to City elections, and records pertaining to State audit requirements. • Provides staff support and administrative assistance to various boards and committees; prepares reports, agendas, correspondence and other materials as appropriate and according to decisions and approved actions. • Manages and maintains website for Council and provide website support/administration for Council and any Council -related assigned boards, committees, groups and/or events. • Maintains files and records related to Council activities/business and retains and purges records as needed under the Washington State records retention and archiving rules. • Operates office machines including: computers, copiers, calculators, fax machines and other equipment as assigned. • Performs a variety of special duties, projects or activities of the Council Office. Required Knowledge of: • City organization, procedures, federal and state laws. • Administrative functions and operations of a City government. • Legislative processes, research methods, data collection and statistical analysis. • Accurate, lawful, and efficient record -keeping techniques. • Budget monitoring and control including proficient skills in mathematics. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. • Principles of customer service and public relations. • Proper telephone etiquette. • Effective oral and written communication principles and practices. C as as a r c a� E 0 0. E w Packet Pg. 271 8.10.a 2022 Employment Agreement Executive Assistant to City Council • Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and c computer applications and software programs sufficient to perform assigned E work. L • English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation. a r • Principles of business letter writing. 0 0. Required Skill in: E w • Computer applications to include Microsoft Office Suite (such as Word, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint, etc.). as • Tracking and researching legislative bills. • Assisting in the management of workload items for 7 Council members who may have, at times, competing interests • Performing technical clerical and administrative duties having department -wide impact. • Planning and performing technical administrative office coordination duties. • Maintaining records, files, and information in compliance with laws, policies and procedures. • Interpreting, applying and explaining rules, regulations, policies, procedures and laws. • Must be able to meet required deadlines for legislative/administrative duties/assignments. • Successfully meeting schedules and time lines. • Preparing a variety of reports, logs, records and files related to assigned activities. • Maintaining confidentiality of sensitive information, including confidentiality between staff and Council members; working confidentially with discretion. • Being flexible and able to work with diverse personalities. • Researching a variety of subjects and presenting information in an efficient, accurate manner. • Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work. • Working with diverse interest groups with potentially competing priorities. • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with elected officials, staff (other departments), management, vendors, outside agencies, community groups and the general public. • Meeting schedules and time lines and ability to work independently. • Communicating effectively verbally and in writing including public relations and customer service. Packet Pg. 272 8.10.a 2022 Employment Agreement Executive Assistant to City Council C d MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: E L Education and Experience: Any combination equivalent to: graduation from high school including or supplemented a c by course work in political science, business administration, office management, office administration or related field and three years of increasingly responsible administrative c office support experience including research work. Previous work experience in a 0. legislative environment and/or role preferred. w Required Licenses or Certifications: Valid State of Washington Driver's License. Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Office environment. • Constant interruptions. • The employee may be required to work some evenings (Tuesday night Council meetings) and occasional weekends for Council events as necessary • Must be able to work in a solitary environment. Physical Abilities: • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. • Reading and understanding a variety of materials. • Operating/using a computer keyboard and other office equipment. • Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time. • Bending at the waist, kneeling or crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 20 lbs. Hazards: • Contact with angry or potentially upset individuals. Packet Pg. 273 8.11 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of Right of Entry and Maintenance Agreement between City of Edmonds and property owner at 21000 Highway 99 Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the June 21, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve Right of Entry and Maintenance Agreement. Narrative As part of the Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway Project - Stage 2, the City is proposing the installation of a raised landscaped median throughout the entire corridor from 2441h St. SW to 2101h St. SW. On both ends of the corridor, a Gateway sign is being added. On the north end, the sign is being added within the raised median. A landscaped area with a tree and bushes will be installed on the west side of Highway 99 behind the sidewalk to line up with this Gateway sign and provide a Gateway feel for southbound vehicles entering Edmonds City limits. Under this agreement, the owner agrees to the installation of the landscaping by our contractor and the maintenance of this landscaped area after the one-year plant establishment expires. The construction of the entire project is scheduled to begin in mid -June and be completed in early 2023. The exact timeline of this landscaping feature is unknown at this time but will be installed during ideal planting season. The preliminary cost estimate for the planting work is $5,100. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Right of Entry and Maintenance Agreement Attachment 2 - Gateway Sign Packet Pg. 274 8.11.a RIGHT OF ENTRY AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT This Right of Entry and Maintenance Agreement ("Agreement") is made effective this day of 2022 between the City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and SC Edmonds RE, LLC, the owner of the property that is the subject of this Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the "Owner". WHEREAS, the Owner owns the real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Property"); and WHEREAS, as part of the Highway 99 Revitalization and Gateway Project — Stage 2, the City intends to install certain landscaping on the Property, as described and depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, entry onto the Property by the City is necessary to install the landscaping as set forth in Exhibit B and to maintain it during the one-year plant establishment period (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Work"); and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to permit the City to enter the Property to undertake the Work; and WHEREAS, the Owner has agreed to the installation of this landscaping and has further agreed to undertake the maintenance of this landscaping after the plant establishment period has expired (hereinafter referred to as the "Long Term Maintenance"); and WHEREAS, the City and the Owner desire to memorialize their understanding of the rights and responsibilities of each with regard to the Work and the Long Term Maintenance; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions herein stated, the City and the Owner agree as follows: 1. Grant of License / Right of Entry. The Owner hereby grants to the City a non-exclusive license of reasonable access to the Property for the purposes of performing the Work and activities reasonably related thereto. The right of entry authorized by this Agreement is subject to all valid rights existing in the Property as of the effective date of this Agreement. The Owner reserves the right to grant others the privilege to use the Property, and the parties specifically agree that this Agreement is not exclusive. The City will not permit any other party, except the City's duly authorized representatives, employees, agents and independent contractors (collectively "Representatives") to enter or use the Property. 1 Packet Pg. 275 8.11.a 2. Contacts. Prior to entry, the City and/or its designated Representative(s) will contact the following representative(s) of the Owner to arrange for access to the Property: Name: Paul Chung Title: General Manager, Swickard Toyota Telephone #: 425-775-4422 3. Liability. While on the Property, the City will comply, and will cause all of its Representatives to comply, with all applicable government laws, ordinances, rules and regulations during the exercise of its rights herein. The City and its Representatives will be responsible for any damage done to the Property by the City or its Representatives during the performance of the above -described Work and will pay the costs of repairing and restoring the Property to substantially the same condition as existed before the City's or its Representative(s)' entry onto the Property. 4. Long Term Maintenance. The Owner agrees to undertake the maintenance of the landscaped area beginning one calendar year after the City has completed the installation of the landscaping as set forth in Exhibit B. Long Term Maintenance will consist of, at a minimum, the regular (at least quarterly) weeding, mulching and edging of the ground around the plantings and the regular (at least annual) trimming and other tasks required to maintain the health of the plants. The Owner will continue the Long Term Maintenance until the termination of this Agreement as set forth in Section 8, below. 5. Governing LawNenue. The validity, meaning, and effect of this Agreement will be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any legal proceeding is initiated involving this Agreement, it will be brought in Snohomish County Superior Court. 6. No Third Party Rights/Assignment. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies upon any person, other than the parties and their respective employees and representatives. 7. Indemnification/Hold Harmless. To the extent authorized by law, the City and the Owner will each indemnify and hold the other, including its officers, employees, and representatives, harmless from and will process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, loss, costs or suits at law or 2 Packet Pg. 276 8.11.a equity arising in whole or in part from that party's negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing herein will require either party to indemnify the other party against and hold harmless the other party from claims, demands, loss, costs or suits at law or equity based solely upon the conduct of the other party, its officers, employees, and representatives; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the City, its officers, employees, or representatives and (b) the Owner, its officers, employees, or representatives, this indemnity provision with respect to: (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence; and (2) the costs to any party of defending such claims and suits, will be valid and enforceable only to the extent of that party's negligence or the negligence of that party's officers, employees, or representatives. The provisions of this section will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Termination. This Agreement will commence on the effective date set forth above. The City's right of entry onto the Property will terminate upon completion of the Work, which will be no later than one calendar year after the completion of the landscaping installation, unless the Owner approves an extension of the right of entry by written amendment to this Agreement. The remainder of this Agreement, and the Owner's Long Term Maintenance obligations hereunder, will terminate upon either: (a) the Owner's sale of the Property; or (b) the Owner's redevelopment of the Property that requires the removal of the landscaping set forth in Exhibit B. 9. Notice. Any notice to be given or any documents to be delivered by either party to the other party herein will be mailed by certified post and addressed to the City or the Owner at the following address: City of Edmonds Bertrand Hauss 121 51h Avenue Edmonds, WA 98020 425-771-0220 Owner Eric Iversen PO Box 371507 Las Vegas, NV 89137 541-301-2748 Either party may, with written notice to the other, designate a different contact name, address and/or telephone number. DATED THIS DAY OF , 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS OWNER Mike Nelson, Mayor Property Owner Packet Pg. 277 8.11.a EXHIBIT A Property Description Property Address: 21000 Highway 99 Lynnwood, WA 98036-7334 HOYT ACRES BLK 000 D-00 LOTS 7,8,9,10,11 & 12 LESS N 30FT OF LOT 12 AS MEAS AT R/A TON LN LOT 12 & TGW FDP TH PTN El/2 SEI/4 SWI/4 OF SEC 20 TWP 27N RGE 4E WM DAF BEG SW COR LOT 7 HOYT AC IN SD SUB TH N PLW W BDY SD SUB 365FT M/L TAP ON S LNLOT 12 HOYT AC PROJ W TH E ALG SD EXT S LN SD LOT 12 TO SW COR LOT 12 TH SWLY ALG W BDY LOTS 7 THRU I I TPB ALSO TGW FDP TH PTN E1/2 SE1/4 SW1/4 SEC 20 TWP 27N RGE 4E WM DAF BEG NW COR LOT 12 HOYTACRES TH S25*12 OOW ALG W LN LOT 12 33.14FT TAP TH IS 30FT S OF N LN LOT 12 AS MEAS AT R/A THE TPB TH N89*57 44W 60FT TH S25*12 OOW 19.14FT TH N89*57 44W366.98FT M/L TO C/L 70TH AVE W TH SO1*4712E ALG SD C/L 25FT TH S89*57 44E 414.44FT M/L TO SW COR LOT 12 HOYT ACRESTH N25*12 OOE 46.76FT M/L TO TPB EXC THE WLY PTN DEEDED FOR RD FOR 70TH AVEW 4 Packet Pg. 278 8.11.a GERANIUM MACRURRHIZUM 0 r az R d EXHIBIT B ° a Q. Landscaping Plans � 1rYVT.=4vu115cuunu NUB I H PA [)PUS PO RAISED M PIMAN hWY 99 h4RT�180�1RD � T..',US LAURUCLHASUVNDUNL VLHYGN' NANDINA DOMF5TICA VOON FLAY' POIY5TIC-.lY VI.A1111 CORNU5KOUSA WNUT Gl PARROTIA PFRSICA VANFSSK Packet Pg. 279 8.11.b North Gateway Sign a+ a Packet Pg. 280 8.12 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approve Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas related to design services for Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project. Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 15, 2018, Council approved a Local Agency Agreement with KPG for the Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements. On November 19, 2019, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement #2 with KPG. On November 17, 2020, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement #3 with KPG. On October 19, 2021, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement #4 with KPG. On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the June 21, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve Supplemental Agreement. Narrative The proposed Supplemental Agreement changes the consultant's name from KPG, P.S. to KPG Psomas, Inc. due to a merger with another consultant. In addition, the completion date is being extended from June 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022 in order to finish all Federal documentation and for the contractor to complete all punchlist items. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Supplemental Agreement #5 Packet Pg. 281 8.12.a AM � Washington State VI/ Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number #5 KPG Psomas Inc. fka KPG, P.S. 3131 Elliot Ave. Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98121 Original Agreement Number Phone: 206-286-1640 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date Fed Aid Number 0365(013) KPG PN 17099 5.21.2018 December 31, 2022 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Citywide Crossing Enhancements $387,251.63 (no change) Description of Work Updating Consultant's legal name and amending the Contract Extension date to December 31, 2022 Up dating Consultant's legal name and amending the Contract Extention date to December 31, 2022. The Project was placed in suspension due to a long lead time for material procurement. The original scope of Work Remains unchan ed. The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with KPG Psomas Inc.fka KPG, P.S. and executed on 5.21.2018 and identified as Agreement No. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: No change to scope of work. This amendment updates the Consultant's legal name from KPG, P.S. to KPG Psomas Inc. and KPG Psomas Inc. is now the contracted party that is undertaking all of the Consultant's responsibilities under this agreement. Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: December 31, 2022 Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: No Change. as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Nandez Miller By: / P ( 2022.06.07 19:54:50-07'00' Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 282 8.13 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approve Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas related to construction management services for Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project. Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On November 17, 2020, City Council approved the Local Agency Agreement with KPG to provide construction management services for the Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project. On October 19, 2021, Supplemental Agreement #1 with KPG for the Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project was approved. On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the June 21, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve Supplemental Agreement. Narrative Supplemental Agreement #2 changes the consultant's name from KPG, P.S. to KPG Psomas, Inc. due to a merger with another consultant. In addition, the completion date is being extended from June 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022 in order to finish all Federal documentation and for the contractor to complete all punchlist items. Attachments: Attachment 1 - KPG Psomas Supplemental Agreement #2 Packet Pg. 283 8.13.a Washington State To Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number 2 KPG Psomas Inc. fka KPG, P.S. 3131 Elliott Ave., Suite 400 Original Agreement Number Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: 206-286-1640 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date SRTS-365(013) 11/30/2020 12/31/2022 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements - CM Services $112,063.53 (No Change) Description of Work Up dating Consultant's legal name and amending the Contract Extention date to December 31, 2022. The Project was placed in suspension due to a long lead time for material procurement. The original scope of Work Remains unchanged. The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with KPG Psomas Inc. and executed on 11/30/2020 and identified as Agreement No. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: No Change 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: New Contract Completion Date 12/31/2022 III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: No Change as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Terry Wright By: Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature L 0 DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 284 8.14 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approve Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas for 76th Ave and 220th Ave Intersection Improvements Project. Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 18, 2021, the Professional Services Agreement with KPG for the 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW Intersection Improvements project was approved. On October 12, 2021, Supplemental Agreement #1 with KPG for the 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW Intersection Improvements Project was approved. On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the June 21, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve Supplemental Agreement. Narrative The propoed Supplemental Agreement changes the consultant's name from KPG, P.S. to KPG Psomas, Inc. due to a merger with another consultant. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Supplemental Agreement #2 Packet Pg. 285 8.14.a AM Washington State To Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number 2 KPG Psomas Inc. flea KPG, P.S. 3131 Elliott Ave, Ste 400 Original Agreement Number Seattle, WA Phone: 206- 286-1640 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date KPG Psomas PN: 21002 5/24/21 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable $261,161.40 (no change) Description of Work Updating Consultant's legal name The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with KPG Psomas Inc. fka KPG, P.S. and executed on 5/24/21 and identified as Agreement No. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: No change to scope of work. This amendment updates the Consultant's legal name from KPG, P.S. to KPG Psomas Inc. and KPG Psomas Inc. is now the contracted party that is undertaking all of the Consultant's responsibilities under this agreement. 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: No change in completion date. III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: No change in payment. as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Nandez Miller By: 2022.06.07 19:56:09-07'00' Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 286 8.15 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approval of Professional Service Agreement for Design Services for the Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the June 21, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve Professional Service Agreement with MurraySmith. Narrative The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in March 2022 to hire a consultant to provide design engineering services for the Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades. The City received statements of qualifications from two (2) engineering firms. The selection committee selected MurraySmith to provide design engineering services for the Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades. The proposed contract will take the design of the project to a 30% level. As part of this work, the design will address needed structural upgrades and pipe replacements in both reservoirs, water leaks in the Yost Reservoir and any other upgrades required by the department of health. In addition, as part of this process, a more in depth evaluation of the reservoirs will be completed. This will supplement the current understanding of the state of the two reservoirs so that any additional items can be factored into this level of design. The design engineering for this phase of the project is estimated to be completed by early 2023. When this phase of the design services is completed, a separate scope and fee will be drafted to finish the design. This scope and fee will be submitted to City Council for approval. Per the attached negotiated scope of services, the cost to complete the work is $253,941. This includes a management reserve of $30,000 that will only be authorized by the City for unforeseen conditions or design changes. All project costs will be funded by the 421 Water Utility Fund. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Professional Service Agreement and Exhibits Attachment 2 - Project Map Packet Pg. 287 8.15.a CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON 121 ST" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR Website: www.edmondswa.gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and MurraySmith, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant." WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a o consulting firm to provide preliminary engineering services with respect to the Yost and Seaview `o Reservoirs Repairs and Upgrades project; and a Cn a WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and experience, and desires to provide — such services to the City; 0 L NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by a and between the parties hereto as follows: �- I . Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Work that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on a time and expense basis as set forth in Exhibit A; provided, in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FORTY ONE DOLLARS ($253,941.00). B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly during the progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been submitted to the City three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle. Packet Pg. 288 8.15.a C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. 3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, reports, and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the Consultant, provided, however, that: A. All final reports, presentations, documentation and testimony prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become the property of the City. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and copy any work product during normal office hours. Documents prepared under this Agreement and in the possession of the Consultant may be subject to public records request and release under Chapter 42.56 RCW. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost. 4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Indemnification / Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, demands, or suits at law or equity arising from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Packet Pg. 289 8.15.a 6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Insurance Coverage A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the State. B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit. D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by o L the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. 4 The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies a at any time. c All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State L of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within a fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City. a No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the City. The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. 7. Discrimination prohibited. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written notification to the City and the City's prior written consent. Packet Pg. 290 8.15.a 10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said termination. 11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document, its Appendices 1 & 2, and the Scope of Work and fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibit A or B, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage the Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and the Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be CO liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation a, is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Work, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Work and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph ° shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render services, or the City to pay for servicesCn rendered, in excess of the Scope of Work in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this a Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. o 0 13. Standard of Care. The Consultant represents that the Consultant has the a necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. The a Consultant and any persons employed by the Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the r work in a professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of w the type described in the Scope of Work. 14. Non -waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non -assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he/she/they has/have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she/they has/have not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. Because this Agreement is subject to federal nondiscrimination laws, the Consultant Packet Pg. 291 8.15.a agrees that the provisions of Appendices 1 & 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, apply to this Agreement. The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. 18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address: Murraysmith 2707 Colby Avenue, Suite I I10 Everett, WA 98201 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three (3) days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed. DATED THIS day of CITY OF EDMONDS Mike Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk] APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 2022. MURRAYSMITH [Name, Title] Packet Pg. 292 8.15.a )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of 2022, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Pg. 293 8.15.a APPENDIX 1 CONTRACT (Appendix A of USDOT 1050.2A Standard Title VI Assurances) During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant/Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Consultant/Contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations: The Consultant/Contractor shall comply with the acts and regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally -assisted programs of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 (49 CFR 21), as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement. Nondiscrimination: The Consultant/Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the Agreement, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income -level, or LEP in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant/Contractor shall not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the Agreement covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR 21. 4 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all a solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by the Consultant/ Contractor for c work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Consultant/Contractor of the L Consultant's/Contractor's obligations under this Agreement and the Regulations relative to a Q. nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income -level, or 4 LEP. 4. Information and Reports: The Consultant/Contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the City or the appropriate state or federal agency to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders, and instructions. Where any information required of a Consultant/Contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the Consultant/Contractor shall so certify to the City, or state or federal agency, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Consultant's/Contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement, the City shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the appropriate state or federal agency may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: • Withholding of payments to the Consultant/Contractor under the Agreement until the Consultant/Contractor complies; and/or • Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Agreement, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant/Contractor shall include the provisions of the above paragraphs one (1) through five (5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The Consultant/Contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontractor or procurement as the City or appropriate state or federal agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Consultant/Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation by a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Consultant/ Contractor may request that the City enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the City; or may request that the appropriate state agency enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the State of Washington. In addition, the Consultant/Contractor may request the appropriate federal agency enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. Packet Pg. 294 8.15.a APPENDIX 2 CONTRACT (Appendix E of USDOT 1050.2A Standard Title VI Assurances) During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant/Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Consultant/Contractor") agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities, including but not limited to: Pertinent Non -Discrimination Authorities: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); in • and 49 CFR Part 21. g ' • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal -aid programs and proejcts); aM • Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of o sex); `o • Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits 'F discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; Q Cn • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), (prohibits a discrimination on the basis of age); G • Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. § 471, Section 47123), as amended, > (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); a • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and Q applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and -- Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or r activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal -aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); w • Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilties Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; E E • The Federal Aviation Administration's Non -Discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits d discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); Q • Executive Order 12898 , Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low -Income Populations, which ensures discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; Cn • Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Person with Limited English Profcency, c and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of ° limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure the LEP person have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 0 74100); a • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq). c Packet Pg. 295 8.15.a EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES YOST AND SEAVIEW RESERVOIRS REPAIRS AND UPGRADES PHASE 1— PRELIMINARY DESIGN CITY OF EDMONDS Background and Approach Murraysmith, Inc. (Murraysmith) has developed the following scope of services and accompanying fee estimate to provide preliminary engineering services for the City of Edmonds (City) Yost and Seaview Reservoirs Repairs and Upgrades project. General information for the reservoirs is summarized below. 1973 1.5 Burled Reinforced concrete Tennis courts Seaview 1975 1.5 Buried Reinforced concrete None The scope and the fee have been developed based on discussions with City staff and our understanding of the project from the previously completed tasks from the Yost and Seaview Reservoir Assessment Project. The reservoir assessment project includes a completed evaluation of the Yost Reservoir, which is summarized in a technical memorandum dated September 02, 2021. The Seaview Reservoir evaluation is currently underway with onsite observation conducted on May 5, 2022. Scope of Services The Scope of Services is divided into the following work tasks: ■ Task 1— Project Management ■ Task 2 — Communications and Meetings ■ Task 3 — Subconsultant Coordination and Review ■ Task 4 — Improvements Evaluation ■ Task 5 — Preliminary Design ■ Task 6 — DOH Project Report ■ Task 7 — Subconsultant Services ■ Task 8 — Unanticipated Task Reserve (As Needed) City of Edmonds MURRAYSMITH Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Ungmdp- June 2022 Packet Pg. 296 8.15.a Upon completion of the work in this scope of services, the improvements for each reservoir will be clearly defined, conceptually detailed at the 30% preliminary design level, and cost estimates will be provided for the City's use in budgeting the proposed improvements. Task 1 - Project Management This task includes project management tasks associated with the project. 1.1 Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices Prepare and submit electronic monthly invoice for review and approval by the City. Each invoice shall include the following information: ■ Billing period (start and end date) included in the invoice ■ Description of work accomplished in each work -breakdown structure (WBS)/contract task for the billing period ■ Name, billing rate, and hours for each resource that worked on each task ■ Percent spent vs. percent completed (by task if appropriate to the project) ■ Potential out -of -scope work items. 1.2 Project Team Management Murraysmith's Project Manager will manage project staff and subconsultants to ensure all services are in conformance with the scope of services, fee estimate, and schedule. 1.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Perform in-house quality assurance reviews of all deliverables Task Deliverables ■ Up to six (6) months of progress reports and invoices Assumptions ■ The total length of this phase of the projects is estimated to be up to six (6) months ■ Kickoff meeting will be held digitally and attended by up to two (2) Murraysmith staff. It is expected to be up to two hours. City of Edmonds MURRAYSMITH Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades June 2022 \\ad.nnsa-ep.conn\Portland\PDX_BD\Clients\Edmonds, WA\Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades 4-22\Scope-Fee\Exh A - Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Prel Design Scope 6 Packet Pg. 297 8.15.a Task 2 — Communications and Meetings This task includes participation in meetings and workshops with City staff. General communications with the City (e.g. email, telephone) are ancillary to other tasks and are not included in this task. 2.1 Kick-off Meeting Prepare for and conduct project kick-off meeting with City staff and key team members to discuss project approach, project schedule and discuss key elements of the project. Prepare meeting agenda and record meeting summary to document items discussed and transmit to City. 2.2 Project Status Coordination Coordinate with City PM as necessary to discuss project progress, review project schedule and budget, and discuss key elements of the project. 2.3 Workshop Prepare for and attend one (1) workshop with City staff to discuss findings of the Seaview Reservoir condition assessment work, collaborate on recommended improvements for each reservoir, and identify specific improvements to proceed with preliminary design. Task Deliverables ■ Agendas (draft and final) ■ Summary of meetings and workshops (draft and final) Assumptions ■ One kick-off meeting with City staff will be attended by up to three (3) Murraysmith staff in addition to subconsultant members of project team. ■ Project status coordination will occur to the extent of the hours shown in the fee estimate ■ One workshop with City staff will be attended by up to three (3) Murraysmith staff in addition to subconsultant members of project team. ■ Murraysmith PM will coordinate with City PM to schedule and facilitate the workshop discussion. ■ Workshop will be held at Edmonds City Hall. Provided by the City ■ Meeting coordination, setup, and hosting City of Edmonds MURRAYSMITH Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades June 2022 \\ad.nnsa-ep.conn\Portland\PDX_BD\Clients\Edmonds, WA\Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades 4-22\Scope-Fee\Exh A - Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Prel Design Scope 6 Packet Pg. 298 8.15.a ■ Review meeting agendas, meeting minutes, and provide comments to Murraysmith ■ Attend all meetings with Murraysmith Task 3 - Subconsultant Coordination and Review 3.1 Survey Coordination and Review Coordinate survey tasks with subconsultant surveyor, DHA, and review draft and final survey deliverables. 3.2 Geotechnical Coordination and Review Coordinate geotechnical tasks with subconsultant geotechnical engineer, HWA, and review draft and final geotechnical deliverables. 3.3 Structural Coordination and Review Coordinate structural tasks with structural engineer, Peterson, and review draft and final structural deliverables. Task Deliverables ■ Geotechnical and structural reports will be included in the appendix of the DOH Project Report, which will be submitted electronically to the City. Task 4 — Improvements Evaluation Improvements identified in the prior condition assessment phase will evaluated and alternative identified to provide the City with options for resolving existing deficiencies. These alternatives will be discussed with the City in the workshop under a separate task. 4.1 Alternatives Evaluation Evaluated alternative improvements identified in the prior condition assessment phase of the project, based on established criteria. 4.2 Cost Evaluation Update the Yost Reservoir improvements cost estimates that were developed in 2021 and develop cost estimates for alternative improvements identified in the prior subtask. Task Deliverables ■ None. The work from this task will be documented in the DOH Project Report. City of Edmonds MURRAYSMITH Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades June 2022 \\ad.nnsa-ep.conn\Portland\PDX_BD\Clients\Edmonds, WA\Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades 4-22\Scope-Fee\Exh A - Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Prel Design Scope 6 Packet Pg. 299 8.15.a Assumptions ■ Up to two (2) improvement alternatives will be developed for each reservoir, as applicable Provided by the City ■ Input on evaluation criteria and proposed improvements Task 5 — Preliminary Design This task will incorporate work completed from the prior tasks and the workshop with City staff as the basis for the development of preliminary plans to the 30% completion level. 5.1 Design Criteria / Basis of Design Develop design criteria for the proposed improvements based on the workshop with City staff, City standards, regulatory agency requirements, and completed services by subconsultants. 5.2 Stormwater Review Review the project work and site conditions for compliance with the City's Surface Water Engineering Standards and identify stormwater tasks to be completed during final design. The work will consider surface water drainage, reservoir drainage and overflow conveyance. 5.3 30% Preliminary Plans Prepare preliminary plans at the 30% completion level for each reservoir using the information developed in prior tasks. Preliminary plans will be developed at a 1"=20' scale for site improvements. 5.4 30% Cost Estimate Prepare 30% opinion of probable construction cost (OPCC) estimate for the proposed improvements of each reservoir. 5.5 Technical Specifications Outline Prepare an outline in table of contents format of the anticipated specifications for the project Task Deliverables ■ 30% preliminary plans at half size (11x17) in PDF format ■ 30% OPCC estimate in PDF format ■ The Design Criteria and Stormwater Review subtask work will be documented in the DOH Project Report. City of Edmonds MURRAYSMITH Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades June 2022 \\ad.nnsa-ep.conn\Portland\PDX_BD\Clients\Edmonds, WA\Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades 4-22\Scope-Fee\Exh A - Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Prel Design Scope 6 Packet Pg. 300 8.15.a Assumptions ■ City review period will be up to 3 weeks for the 30% preliminary plans and OPCC Provided by the City ■ Comments from review of the 30% preliminary plans and OPCC Task 6 — DOH Project Report 6.1 Draft Project Report Prepare a draft report and submit to City for review and comment. The report will document the project background, proposed improvements, design criteria, evaluation, and cost estimate. Include in the appendix the 30% preliminary plans, prior phase condition assessment technical memorandums, and the technical memorandums from the services performed by subconsultants. The report will be prepared to fulfill the Department of Health (DOH) Project Report requirements for facility projects. 6.2 Final Project Report Modify report and plans based on City review comments and submit copies of final report and plans to City. 6.3 DOH Report Submittal and Coordination Submit the Project Report and required DOH form to DOH for review in accordance with the project report requirements for proposed facility projects. Coordinate with DOH staff as required and provide written responses to comments received from DOH's review of the report. Task Deliverables ■ Draft and final project report to the City ■ Final project report to DOH Assumptions ■ City review period will be up to 2 weeks for the project report Provided by the City ■ Comments from review of the project report City of Edmonds MURRAYSMITH Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades June 2022 \\ad.msa-ep.com\Portland\PDX_BD\Clients\Edmonds, WA\Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades 4-22\Scope-Fee\Exh A - Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Prel Design Scope 6 Packet Pg. 301 8.15.a Task 7 — Subconsultant Services 7.1 Surveying and Mapping (DHA) Murraysmith's subconsultant Doug Hartman and Associates (DHA) will provide the utility locating, field surveying, and base mapping services for the project. Murraysmith will coordinate the extent of the survey and review and provide comment on the base mapping to the surveyor. A more detailed description of services is provided in DHA's attached scope and fee estimate. 7.2 Geotechnical Engineering (HWA) Murraysmith subconsultant HWA Geosciences (HWA) will provide geotechnical engineering services consisting of subsurface explorations and analyses to develop recommendations for the reservoirs and site improvements. A more detailed description is provided in HWA's attached scope and fee estimate. 7.3 Structural Engineering (Peterson) Murraysmith subconsultant, Peterson Structural Engineers (Peterson), will provide structural engineering services for preliminary design of the two reservoirs. This includes updating the structural evaluations with the new geotechnical information (seismic and soil parameters) from HWA. A more detailed description of services is provided in Peterson's attached scope and fee estimate. Task 8 — Unanticipated Task Reserve (As -Needed) A reserve budget amount has been included in the fee estimate for work under this task, which may include additional unanticipated work not specifically identified in the scope of work tasks defined above. Such work items will be undertaken only after written authorization from the City. Preliminary Estimated Schedule Murraysmith will begin work upon receipt of Notice to Proceed from the City and complete all work in approximately six months. City of Edmonds MURRAYSMITH Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades June 2022 \\ad.nnsa-ep.conn\Portland\PDX_BD\Clients\Edmonds, WA\Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades 4-22\Scope-Fee\Exh A - Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Prel Design Scope 6 Packet Pg. 302 EXHIBIT B SEAVIEW AND YOST RESERVOIRS -PRELIMINARY DESIGN CITY OF EDMONDS FEE ESTIMATE 8.15.a L ABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS) 4 Principal Engineer VI Principal Engineer V Professional Engineer VI I Engineering Designer III Cost Estimator III — Principal 11 Technician IV — Administr III Subsonsultants Itiplier X Markup Total with Markup CADD Units $18/hr ONE --------- --------- --------- --------- Taskl.2- Project Team Management --------- --------- Task 2.3 - Workshop aammaaaam®®®�®®® TaskSSubtotal --------- --------- Report . . .. . .:Coordination Task 6 Subtotal Task 7 Subtotal Unanticipated Task Reserve (As Needed) Task 8 Subtotal oaooaaaoa ®®®®�®® C a'l a) L 0 Q U) 0 0 L Q Q Q N r x w c �a c as E a) W Q a� �L s= 0 0 a City of Edmonds Seav E°Rez°zz """FFay=mith Packet Pg. 303 xM1 R Yost -& 9eaview Reservoirs Desi gn ign Fee 69-32xlsx City of Edmonds Maabook 8.16 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Approve Select Homes 7918 203rd St SW 10-foot Right -of -Way Dedication Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the June 21, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve 10-foot right-of-way dedication. Narrative The City is currently reviewing a proposed 2-lot subdivision at 7918 203rd St SW. In accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.75.085 (Subdivision - Review Criteria), the city council may require dedication of land in the proposed subdivision for public use. In accordance with ECDC 18.50.020 (Official Street Map - Dedication presumption and requirement), applicants for a subdivision shall be presumed to create development impacts upon the street and transportation system of the city and such presumed impacts shall be mitigated by the dedication of such right-of-way to the city and to public use. The City's Official Street Map indicates a 10-foot right-of-way dedication is required along the 203rd St SW property frontage of the subject development. As a condition of development, the 10-foot right-of-way shall be deeded to the City. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Partial Site Plan Packet Pg. 305 I 8.16.a I City of Edmonds ■1 Ill 110111 IL I %E I a 16.% IN L Nis q Ss +�■ N t k ` w . a aF +l a so 7918 203rd St SW SP Vicinity Map -F tr a I M ■E 1 111 11 0 505.19 1,010.4 Feet 752.3 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is fc 9,OZ8 P � B P PP B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurat, WGS_1984_Web _Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliabl, © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTIOI o Z,, r s[crn- � rADuriil.s aI O O Legend 47 c r Sections Boundary Sections Edmonds Boundary -O ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIP C ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN 04 — <all other values> rn Interstate ~ Principal Arterial E Minor Arterial; Collector O Local Street; On Ramp V M State Highways y — <all other values> fn a) -- a > 0 1 Q 2 Q County Boundary Q to Parks ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY WASHIr += ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES Z ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY CITIES 5 City of Edmonds City of Lynnwood m City of Mountlake Terrace E s Unincorporated King Co; Unincor City of Woodway Q Citv of Arlinaton: Citv of Bothell: d Notes s Packet Pg. 306 ATTACHMENT 2: PARTIAL SITE PLAN 22- 12" 50 0 6, OO.V VANED GRATE PVC TEE RlM 424.10 6' IE 42140 (OUT-S)' 'NO PARKING - . FIRE LANE" SIGNS & 100 , O-C MAX' (SEE DETAIL ON SH T D 1- 02) lNnL MA 17ON TRENCH 7� WDE x -120� LONG X 4 DEEP- W TH 5 - PERF PVC PIPES (SEE DETAIL THIS SFE-Er) 25* DRAINAGE & jamr U77UrYEASEMENT (TYP) ACCESS EASEME&Nr CR f "s -sdll s 203RD ST Slff� — !!L—SD —W L------------------- --------- IG'ROW DE-01CA nON 144, a ULCAIVV i — — RIM 424-41 6- IE 421.45 (IN-P 6' C 421.45 (OUT-S) . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . "ASPHALT PR; VA T ROAD . . . . . . Et DETAIL THIS SHEET) . . . . . . . I . O'PRIVATE I . rSEiIER EASEMENT 61422.6i . . . . . . . . . I Packet Pg. 307 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Resolution Adopting Findings of Fact in Support of Interim Design Standards for Multifamily -only Buildings in the BD2 zone Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michael Clugston Background On February 15, 2022, Council adopted an emergency moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for certain projects in the Downtown Business (BD2) zone. The moratorium applied to projects that require a SEPA threshold determination on sites that were not subject to the Designated Street Front standards in Chapters 16.43 and 22.43 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The moratorium (which is no longer in effect) was intended to give staff time to create interim design standards to address gaps in the code that apply to those sites. On April 21, 2022, the Council approved emergency Ordinance 4256 and the interim design standards that were created for multifamily -only buildings in the BD2 zone. The interim standards are valid for six months. On June 14, 2022, the Council took public testimony regarding the interim design standards as required by state law. Staff Recommendation Adopt the findings of fact in support of retaining the interim BD2 design standards. By adopting, the remaining BD2 parcels that do not have the Designated Street Front requirement will have the additional design standards for materials, private amenity space, and street -side amenity space. By not adopting, the interim standards go away and any future multifamily -only building would not have to comply with them. Narrative These are not permanent standards. Because these are interim design standards, final standards must now be developed. The final standards must be adopted by October 21, 2022 since the interim standards adopted on April 21 are only valid for six months. The Architectural Design Board and Planning Board will work on the final design standards and make a recommendation to Council who must decide on the final standards. Attachments: Resolution on findings supporting BD2 interim design standards Ordinance 4256 and Interim BD2 Design Standards 2022-04-21 City Council - Excerpt Minutes Packet Pg. 308 9.1 2022-04-19 City Council - Excerpt Minutes Packet Pg. 309 9.1.a N RESOLUTION NO. m as A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO SUPPORT THE 0 0 ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 4256, WHICH ADOPTED INTERIM DESIGN Q. a STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THE Cn BD2 ZONE. S WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots that do not front on a designated street front; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was originally intended to allow planning staff sufficient time to draft interim design standards for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, planning staff completed a proposed set of interim design standards for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, the interim design standards only apply to projects in the BD2 zone that do not have the Designated Street Front requirement and are multifamily -only buildings; and WHEREAS, the intent of the interim design standards is to ensure that this type of project is compatible within the downtown area by adding standards for materials, private amenity space, and street -side amenity space; and WHEREAS, the city council adopted the interim design standards with Ordinance 4256 on April 21, 2022; and WHEREAS, the city council held the required public hearing on the interim design standards on June 14, 2022, which was within 60 days as required by RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220; and WHEREAS, planning staff will continue to work on a permanent set of design standards, which will be ready for adoption in October 2022; and WHEREAS, the city council desires to keep in effect the interim design standards adopted by Ordinance 4256 while the work referenced above continues; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS. The city council hereby adopts as its findings of fact to support the adoption of Ordinance 4256 the Whereas clauses contained in this Resolution and also in Ordinance 4256. RESOLVED this day of , 2022. Packet Pg. 310 9.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, MIKE NELSON ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. N c m as s 0 r- 0 a a Cn c Packet Pg. 311 9.1.b ORDINANCE NO. 4256 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots that do not front on a designated street front; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4247 took effect on immediately on February 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium adopted by Ordinance 4247 was scheduled to terminate on April 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended six days by virtue of Ordinance 4253; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was intended to allow planning staff sufficient time to draft interim regulations for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, the six -day extension was afforded to allow planning staff and the city attorney sufficient time to research the history and legislative intent surrounding the BD zones and the designated street front; and WHEREAS, with work continuing on the designated street front, it is proposed that these standards be adopted without lifting the moratorium and that the moratorium be lifted in conjunction with resolution of designated street front issues; and WHEREAS, planning staff have now completed a proposed set of interim design standards for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, planning staff continue to work on a permanent set of multi -family design standards, which could be ready for adoption in the next six -months; and WHEREAS, while the work referenced above continues, the city council desires to adopt the following interim standards to bring the BD2 regulation into closer harmony with the city's values and policy statements; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Interim ❑esign Standards. A new section 22.43.080, entitled "Additional Design Standards Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buildings in the BD2 zone," is hereby added Packet Pg. 312 to the Edmonds Community Development Code to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. Section 2. Duration of -Interim Design Standards. The interim design standards adopted by this ordinance shall commence on the effective date of this ordinance. As long as the city holds a public hearing on this ordinance and adopts findings and conclusions in support of its continued effectiveness (as contemplated by Section 3 herein), this ordinance shall not terminate until six (6) months after the effective date, unless it is repealed sooner. Section 3. Public Hearing on Interim Standards. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing on this interim ordinance within sixty (60) days of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on May 17, 2022 unless the city council, by subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No later than the next regular council meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council shall adopt findings of fact on the subject of this interim ordinance and either justify its continued effectiveness or repeal the interim ordinance. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Declaration of EmeMencv. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the city council, is not subject to referendum. Because it is not subject to referendum, RCW 35A.12.130 applies. Pursuant to RCW 35A.12.130, this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage by a majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the city council. The city council hereby declares that an emergency exists necessitating that this 2 Packet Pg. 313 ordinance take immediate effect. Without taking immediate effect the interim regulations adopted by this ordinance would not take effect prior to the expiration of the moratorium, allowing for the possibility that building permit applications could become vested to the existing regulations, which are not consistent with the city's values and vision for the BD2 zone. Therefore, these interim regulations must be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, and to ensure that any building permit applications submitted would vest to the regulations set forth in this ordinance. This ordinance does not affect any existing vested rights. Section 6. Publication. This ordinance shall be published by an approved summary consisting of the title. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance is not subject to referendum and shall take effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon passage, as set forth herein, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the Council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130. If it is only approved by a majority of the Council, it will take effect five days after passage and publication. APPROVED: MAY MIKE NELS N ATTEST/AUTHENTI TED: &JYXW,SCOtL!�4AEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Packet Pg. 314 BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: April 28, 2022 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: April 19, 2022 PUBLISHED: April 21, 2022 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 2022 ORDINANCE NO. 4256 4 Packet Pg. 315 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4256 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 191h day of April, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4256. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 191h day of April, 2022. �y CIT CL I %K, S c,6 SEY Packet Pg. 316 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publieation State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDI1953211 ORMNIANCE 4255, 4256 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of I issuc(s), such publication commencing on 04/25/2022 and ending on 04/25/2022 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount o the fee for su publication is $37.84. Subsefted and sworn air.. day of ;,,,,,me on this Nof!aty Public in and for the State of Washington. Ciq• of Edmonds - LEGALADS 114101416 SCOIT PASSEY + Linda Phillips Notary Public State of Washington MyAppoin.-,ent Expires 8!2912025 Commis„ion Number b417 .may Packet Pg. 317 Classified Proof ORDINANCE SUMMARY gf the Cily0IEdmoods, Washington On the 2151 o[ Aprll, 2022, the City Council of fie City of Edmonds, passed Iha following Oronarmes, The Summaries of said ordinances consisting of titles are provided as fottoWS: ORpINAN� - NO.4255 AN ORDINANCE OF H CITY DMbNDS, WASHINGTON. EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMTT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT 00 NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED BY ORDINANCES 4253 AND 4254. ORDINANCE NO.425E AN ORDINANCE OF c�IDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. The full text of these Ordinances will be sent upon roquest. DATED Ihis 21st Day of ApnL 2D22 CITY CLERK. SCOTT PASSEY Published: April 25, 2022. EDH953211 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 04/25/2022 01:18:20 pm Page: 2 Packet Pg. 318 EXHIBIT A 22.43.080 Additional Design Standards Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buildings in the BD2 zone. A. Intent. To ensure that buildings entirely comprised of multiple dwelling residential units are compatible with the downtown area. B. Materials. Building facades must be clad with preferred building materials which include natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber cement products and the like may be permitted by the Director or Architectural Design Board if they replicate the appearance of the preferred materials. C. Private Amenity Space. An exterior area equivalent to at least 10% of the project's gross lot area must be provided as private amenity space for residents of the development. This standard can be met through a combination of balconies (cantilevered, recessed or semi - recessed), decks, patios or yards for individual dwelling units or the site as a whole. 1. Not all dwelling units are required to have private amenity space. When it is provided, it must be immediately accessible from the dwelling unit and be a minimum of 40 sq. ft. 2. If the space is at ground level facing a street, no fence may be over three feet in height. 3. Balconies may encroach into a required setback adjacent to R-zoned property up to a maximum of 5 feet. Patios and decks may encroach into a required setback adjacent to R-zoned property up to a maximum of 10 feet. D. Some roof modulation is required with preference for step-downs that follow the slope when slope exists. E. Street -side amenity space or Pedestrian Area. An exterior area equivalent to at least 5% of the project's gross lot area must be provided as street -side amenity space or pedestrian area. This space must be arranged along the street front between the building and the sidewalk and must be open to the sky, unless otherwise excepted. The space must be pedestrian -oriented and may include the following elements: 1. Landscaping 2. Seating area 3. A similar feature as approved by the Director or Architectural Design Board 4. Areas allocated to private amenity space cannot be used toward the street -side amenity space or pedestrian area requirement. Packet Pg. 319 9.1.c UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER PAINE VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE Senior Planner Mike Clugston offered to review the language in the packet. Councilmember K. Johnson said the first step is to un-table this item so the council can discuss it. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON TO UN -TABLE THIS DISCUSSION ITEM FOR INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY ONLY BUILDING IN THE BD2 ZONE. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said he included a recommendation in the agenda that the council not un-table the motion as it will be a much easier process to move the ordinance in packet. Otherwise a number of amendments would need to be made to the ordinance that the council tabled. If the council prefers to start where they left off on Tuesday, that is certain the council's prerogative. Councilmember K. Johnson asked for further clarification, advising she did not see the recommendation to not un-table the item and she did not understand how the council could discuss it without un-tabling it. Mr. Taraday relayed the recommendation to move the ordinance in the packet. Tuesday's motion was to move the ordinance in that packet. They are not the same ordinances and the council's deliberation would be much more straightforward if the council began by moving the ordinance in the packet. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding that by not removing the item from the table, it would be tabled indefinitely. Mr. Taraday agreed, explaining there is no obligation to ever remove something from the table. His intent was to provide the most streamlined process; the ordinance in tonight's packet will be the best starting point for council's deliberation and starting anywhere else will make deliberations more complex. He recommended leaving Tuesday's ordinance on the table and starting deliberations with the ordinance in tonight's packet. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND-ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4253. Councilmember Tibbott said staff did a good job of capturing the essence of Tuesday's conversation and he agreed with the language used to describe the design standards. He will support ordinance. Councilmember Paine said she will support this ordinance and hoped it would be sufficient for as long as it was needed. She hoped the feasibility study regarding the needs of either commercial businesses or residential in this part of town would be completed prior to the moratorium's expiration on June 2nd. She will support the interim ordinance, expressing her preference to have moratorium lifted well before June 2nd Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 21, 2022 Q Page 6 Packet Pg. 320 9.1.c Councilmember Chen asked for clarification on design standard D, some roof modulation is required with preference for step-down that follows the slope when slope exists. He asked if that affected the building height. Mr. Clugston answered this was offered as an amendment on Tuesday. It does not affect the maximum height in the zone which is still 30 feet for the BD2 zone, but requires some roof modulation and step-down is one of the option. Councilmember Chen asked if the roof modulation referred to the same building or separate buildings. Mr. Clugston answered it would refer to two separate buildings, As the slope steps down, there would be roof modulation between the buildings and the intent is that each building would have some roof modulation. That could be achieved via a step-down or other ways. Councilmember Chen summarized the intent is for the view from the higher building to not be blocked by the building lower on the slope. Mr. Clugston said he did not know if that was the intent of adding this standard. If there is a slope, the buildings would step down the slope and there would be opportunity to modulate the roof. Councilmember Chen expressed support for the ordinance. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Exhibit A, Chapter 22.43.080, was adopted as part of this ordinance. Mr. Taraday answered yes. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, ADD TO THE END OF SECTION A, INTENT, "AND COMPLY TO HUMAN SCALE BY VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL MODULATION." Councilmember Buckshnis said a builder with over 20 years' experience indicated using "compatible within the downtown area" could result in a big block building and suggested adding human scale. The intent of the amendment is to take vertical and horizontal issues into account. She recall Councilmember Tibbott asking about that relative to the post office building. Councilmember Paine asked if an addition to the intent helped describe what was required or was that accomplished via the specifics regarding materials, private amenity space, street site amenities, roof modulation, landscaping, etc. Human scale is subjective depending on context. Adding human scale is a broader discussion that should be reviewed by the planning board and ADB to ensure they are comfortable with adopting that because they would need to review against it. Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin answered this section will be a subsection of the broader design standards. The intent and purpose of those design standards already articulate human scale, keeping with the historic nature of downtown, repeating historic patterns, vertical and horizontal modulation, etc. so it would be redundant. Having an intention statement identifies the outcome once all the design standards are rolled up. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND SO THE TITLE OF THE ORDINANCE READS, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. , AND LIFT-ING—THE AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO AMEND ITEM 2 RELATED TO BALCONIES, TO ADD AT THE END OF THE FIRST SENTENCE, "DECKS ENCROACHING INTO SETBACKS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO THE SECOND FLOOR ONLY." Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 21, 2022 Q Page 7 Packet Pg. 321 9.1.c Councilmember Buckshnis commented it is important to understand that decks encroach on the vibrancy of the City because it is part of the common space. Therefore, she wanted to ensure that decks that encroach into the setback were limited to the second floor and up. Councilmember Paine assumed all decks would on the second or third floor and she did not understand what this amendment would change. Most likely decks would encroach, but not beyond 5 feet. Councilmember Buckshnis provided an example, pointing out on the post office building part of it is commercial and she considered the patios to be decks. Mr. Clugston explained the intent of the standard was balconies are on the second and third floors of buildings and can project out or be built into the building; decks and patios are at the ground level which is why two different standard distances were proposed. On the ground level, they can project into the 15 foot setback by 10 feet and balconies on the second and third floors can project a maximum of 5 feet. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 6:11 p.m. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 21, 2022 Q Page 8 Packet Pg. 322 9.1.d 3. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE (previously Item 8.2) Senior Planner Mike Clugston provided an update on the status of the design standards for multifamily only buildings in BD2. Since the April 5' meeting where there were comments on several of the design standards, staff took the standards to the Architectural Design Board (ADB) who were generally in favor of the proposed language with a couple of tweaks. Staff s recommend is to approve the interim design standards in Exhibit 2 via the ordinance in Exhibit 3. With regard to materials, which was one of the design standards, no change was recommended; the ADB and the public seemed to like the concept of materials used on these types of buildings. Similarly, for the street side amenity space, the concept that provides a setback was well received and no changes are proposed. Mr. Clugston continued, there were no concerns with the private amenity space generally, but there was some concern with roof top decks. As a result a small change was proposed to the roof top deck areas as outlined in the packet. Previously a roof top deck would be allowed to fulfill the amenity space requirement; that was changed to say it could not be used to fulfill the amenity space requirement, but could be provided. Another question raised was whether roof top decks should be allowed to the edge of the roof; the building code allows railings at the edge. There was some concern from the council, public and the ADB who felt some setback of the railing would be useful for safety and proposed a 5-foot setback as a starting point. He recalled a setback for the railing was also suggested by a member of the public at the April 5' meeting. Mr. Clugston continued, another question was raised about whether the roof top deck should be counted toward the private amenity space requirement. There was some concern that a developer would put all the 50% amenity space on the roof, thereby depriving some individual residences of balconies, decks and patios. The revised language changes the ability to use the roof top deck to meet the amenity space requirement; a roof top deck is still allowed, but all the private amenity space has to be provided with individual units or at the ground level meeting the existing standards in the proposed language. He summarized with the feedback from council, the ADB and the public, the design standards are generally pretty good and would result in improved projects in multifamily only buildings in BD2. Council President Olson said she not sure she was against the idea of a roof top deck but was not sure she was ready to say they absolutely should be allowed. Her concern was with building heights, a cultural value in Edmonds. When building heights were increased 5 feet at one point, the idea wasn't to allow increased levels of living units, but to allow for some roof modulation or slope so the roofs were not all flat because that is not a great design in the Pacific Northwest. Things can be placed on a roof top deck, even if they aren't permanent, such as umbrellas and furniture. If part of the desire to keep building heights at a certain level is to be respectful of views due to the slope throughout the lower level of Edmonds, she had an issue with roof top decks in the context of the community value of avoiding increasing building heights due the impact on views. She summarized she was uncertain she was ready to allow roof top decks as an amenity. Mr. Clugston responded a number of exceptions to the height are allowed such as an architectural feature that can cover 5% of the roof area on a BD building, elevator penthouses, solar panels, etc. He summarized the height limit such as 30 feet is not an absolute drop dead maximum as things can project above it. Using that information, staff determined roof top decks fit with that concept particularly if the railings are transparent and there are no permanent structures on the roof top. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 19, 2022 Q Page 17 Packet Pg. 323 9.1.d Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin said staff is not wed to the concept of roof top decks as part of the interim design standards. The most recent revision excludes roof top decks from the required private amenity space and they are happy to exclude roof top deck from the interim design standards. The multifamily design standards are a 2022 work plan item which will provide more time to delve into it. The focus of the interim design standards is setback, articulation, and more green space on multifamily buildings. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was not sure if she was in favor of roof top decks; Edmonds is not Seattle and Seattle has a lot of them. She might be interested if they were recessed further than five feet. She recalled complaints the City received about the visibility of a tent on a business's roof for a long period of time due the slope. She supported having more research done because Edmonds is unique and she anticipated roof top patios could get out of hand. There are rooftop patios in many large cities and she was not sure Edmonds was large enough for that yet. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE REVISED INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS IN EXHIBIT 2 AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE IN EXHIBIT 3. Councilmember L. Johnson commented this is the third time the council has worked on this and the issues that were raised last week have been addressed. Staff came forward with what the council requested and further amendments can be made. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE BY REMOVING THE ROOF TOP PORTION AS IT IS WORTHY OF FURTHER DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Paine expressed support for the product as amended, noting there is an opportunity for greater review by the public and another public process. This is a good interim proposal and it was her understanding the process would take about nine months which would allow for a good public process. A MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON TO AMEND TO CHANGE THE CURRENT SECTION D OF 22.43.080 TO E AND ADD A NEW SECTION D THAT READS, SOME ROOF MODULATION IS REQUIRED WITH PREFERENCE FOR STEP DOWNS THAT FOLLOW THE SLOPE WHEN SLOPE EXISTS. Council President Olson said that was one of the features she notices and likes when she is downtown and prefers to see. The history of allowing an additional 5 feet in height was to allow slope on roofs or modulation so buildings were not square boxes and were a more attractive design. She recognized these were interim design standards, but some projects will vest under these interim design standards. Councilmember Paine asked how much slope modulation there was in other parts of Edmonds. She was concerned this would be disparate if it was only required in one of the business districts, noting it was not required for single family residences. She asked if any other zoning districts in the City required modulation on the slope. Council President Olson offered a point of clarification, that was not the amendment. Her motion was some roof modulation is required with preference for step-downs that follow the slope when slope exists, it would not be a mandate. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 19, 2022 Q Page 18 Packet Pg. 324 9.1.d Councilmember Paine said she was still curious about the answer to her question, whether this existed in any other zones. Mr. Clugston answered in the RM zones the base height maximum was 25 feet and an additional 5 feet was allowed with a roof pitch of 4:12 or greater. That was also permitted in BC zones. Councilmember Chen asked if there were any buildings in the City that had roof top amenities. Mr. Clugston answered roof top decks were allowed in other zones but the only one he was aware of was the new building at Westgate. Councilmember Chen said that could be a wonderful feature with enough setback. He supported respecting people's privacy by having enough distance from the edge of building so that people were looking at the water and mountain views and not into other people's windows. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AMEND WITH REGARD TO GROUND FLOOR STREET FRONTS, TO EXTEND THE STREET FRONT TO THE ABUTTING CORNERS AROUND THE INTERSECTION TO INCLUDE STREET FRONTS IN THOSE LOCATIONS. THE EFFECT WOULD BE TO EXTEND WHERE THERE IS COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL ON THE GROUND FLOOR IN THOSE LOCATIONS. THERE ARE THREE PLACES ON THE MAP WHERE IT IS EXTENDED TO ALL FOUR CORNERS AND FOUR PLACES WHERE IT IS NOT. FOR EXAMPLE MAIN AND 6TH, IT STOPS RIGHT AT 6TH AND THERE ARE TWO OTHER CORNERS THAT DO NOT HAVE STREET FRONT AND THREE OTHER PLACES THAT SIMILAR TO THAT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. Mr. Taraday asked if the intent was to have that brought back or have an ordinance drafted tonight that would accomplish that. Councilmember Tibbott said he was open to asking Mr. Taraday to bring and ordinance back to council for review. Mr. Taraday said he would need to work with planning staff on that; that type of an amendment would be difficult to adopt tonight. If the intent is to have that in place before lifting the moratorium, the moratorium would need to be extended. The complexity involved with a map amendment of that nature would be difficult to do at 10:15 p.m. without long extensions of the meeting. If the council extended the moratorium for a month, it would give him time work with the planning division to bring back an ordinance that would accomplish that. If that was the case, there would need to be other amendments made to the ordinance currently before the council such removing language in Section 2 that lifts the moratorium. Council President Olson asked if the council was otherwise satisfied with the design standards, could the section about the moratorium be struck while staff is figuring out the designated street front. Mr. Taraday answered the council has options, 1) adopt the design standards as just amended and lift the moratorium, or 2) adopt the design standards as just amended and keep the moratorium in place. Adopting the design standards and keeping the moratorium in place will require two separate ordinances. As he was not certain how the discussion/vote would go, as a precaution, he prepared an ordinance to extend the moratorium for a month so it was ready if the council needed it. If council wants to adopt the design standards as amended and keep moratorium in place, a motion would need to be made to approve the version of the ordinance that he sent the council by email this afternoon that contains immediate effect language, not the packet version of the ordinance. Section 2 of that ordinance which repeals the moratorium would need to be deleted. He summarized if the council likes the design standards as amended and does not want to repeal the moratorium, that could be accomplished by deleting Section 2 of the ordinance he sent council this afternoon. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 19, 2022 Q Page 19 Packet Pg. 325 9.1.d COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO ACCEPT THE DESIGN STANDARDS AS AMENDED TONIGHT AND OTHERWISE REPRESENTED IN THE ORDINANCE SENT THIS AFTERNOON BY EMAIL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DELETING SECTION 2 THAT LIFTS THE MORATORIUM. Councilmember L. Johnson observed there was an motion on the floor to approve the ordinance in the packet. Mr. Taraday agreed the ordinance was moved originally and assumed the version of the ordinance was the one he sent this afternoon. Councilmember L. Johnson said her motion was to approve the ordinance in the packet. Mr. Taraday clarified the packet version will not take effect prior to the expiration of the moratorium. A version of the ordinance needs to be adopted which takes effect immediately which is why he sent out a revised version this afternoon. The revised version does not change any of the substance of the design standards, it is contains a declaration of emergency and has an immediate effect clause. He asked whether the maker of the motion was okay substituting that version for the version in the packet. Councilmember L. Johnson said she was unable to give that at this point without reading what was emailed. Mayor Nelson observed there was already a motion on the floor and this is another motion. He suggested addressing the main motion. Council President Olson began to make an amendment, to have Section 2 deleted that lifts the moratorium. She asked if the emergency clause could be removed if the moratorium was not lifted. Mr. Taraday said if the council wanted to prevent developments vesting to the preexisting standards, the ordinance needs to take effect immediately. The packet version does not take effect immediately; the council would need to adopt the version he sent this afternoon in order for it to take effect immediately. He offered to highlight the change to the ordinance in the packet. Councilmember L. Johnson clarified the version Mr. Taraday sent this afternoon does not lift the moratorium, it allows the design standards to take immediate effect. Mr. Taraday answered it does both; the council probably will want the design standards to take immediate effect either way unless a separate ordinance is adopted that extends the moratorium. If a separate ordinance is adopted to extend the moratorium, then the design standards ordinance does not need to be an emergency. The motion was clarified as follows: Councilmember L. Johnson was open to changing the motion to include what was emailed to the council now that she had had a chance to look at it, provided that that lifts the moratorium. The seconder, Councilmember Paine agreed as long as it lifted the moratorium. Councilmember Buckshnis said she would like to see all of this in writing and give citizens an opportunity to participate. She was concerned that at 10:25 p.m., the council was attempting to approve something that was sent this afternoon and then making amendments to it. She preferred to have the ordinance in the packet. She did not support the motion but wanted to have the moratorium extended so this could be fixed and everyone could see it in writing in the packet. She asked what needed to be done to make that happen. Mr. Taraday said the council would want to adopt the other ordinance he emailed this evening, not the afternoon one, that extends the moratorium for a month. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the council would have to wait to do that until the motion the floor was addressed. Mr. Taraday agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis did not support the motion as she believed there needed to be a public process, the public had not read the ordinance and she had only read it quickly. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT WE TABLE THIS MOTION. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 19, 2022 Q Page 20 Packet Pg. 326 9.1.d UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM ONE MONTH. Council President Olson observed there was an ordinance that does that. She offered to read the ordinance. Councilmember L. Johnson raised a point of order, asking where this was on the agenda. Council President Olson answered this was one of the things the council can do. Councilmember L. Johnson said the council tabled this item. Mr. Taraday explained the motion to adopt the ordinance that adopts the interim design standards was tabled. If the council wants to take alternative action regarding the moratorium, it can do so, it can amend agenda, etc. A majority of the council can do whatever it wants during a regular meeting. Councilmember L. Johnson observed it was not on the existing agenda. Council President Olson asked if it was the council's desire to take vote to add this to the agenda or could it be done via a head nod. Councilmember L. Johnson commented the council did not take action via head nods. Council President Olson restated her motion: TO ADD THE ITEM TO THE AGENDA AND EXTEND THE MORATORIUM. Councilmember Paine said adding this to the agenda at 10:26 p.m. was a rather thin nail to hang the transparency hat on. Councilmember Chen said the council needs more time and cannot vote on something that was sent in the afternoon. He did not support the motion. Council President Olson offered to withdraw the motion and plan a special meeting on Thursday. Councilmember Chen said that would be more appropriate. Councilmember K. Johnson said she like to take this vote tonight and did not want to have a special meeting on Thursday for this one item. It is part and parcel of what the council has discussed tonight related to adopting a resolution to adopt the findings in support of the BD2 moratorium. The motion would be to extend moratorium and she favored taking that action tonight. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND 10 MINUTES TO 10:40. MOTION CARRIED (5-2) COUNCILMEMBERS L. JOHNSON AND PAINE VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, FOR AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONE LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED BY ORDINANCE 4253. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 19, 2022 Q Page 21 Packet Pg. 327 9.1.d Councilmember Buckshnis said this was following through on what Councilmember K. Johnson said. There is a moratorium in place, this is the formal action to extend it for one month. If the council does not take this action, the moratorium will expire on Thursday and she did not think the city attorney and staff would have the necessary materials completed in time for a continued meeting on Thursday. She preferred to either approve extending the moratorium and if not, it will end on April 21 and the interim building standards will take effect. This will give time to do what needs to be done in terms of getting packet materials done and extending the moratorium. Councilmember L. Johnson did not support the motion. She found it interesting that the council just tabled something based on being unable to review something that was received at 5:00 p.m., yet would vote on a document that was received during the council meeting which she has not had an opportunity to review. Councilmember Paine preferred to come back on Thursday. There is a chance to have enough public process to get through the tail end of the moratorium. Moratoriums are damaging to the City's reputation and progress on building, things that are normally allowed. She felt it was shortsighted and that the council would not get that much more information about what the business practices need to look like within a month as that is a much bigger study. Councilmember Chen agreed that the council needs to come back on Thursday. It is late at night and all of a sudden the council wants to pass a motion to extend the moratorium. He was not comfortable supporting that. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mr. Taraday explained a 4-3 vote adopts the ordinance, but does not take immediate effect with a 4-3 vote and will take effective 5 days after passage and publication. If the council does not meet on Thursday to take some other action, the moratorium will end at the close of business on Thursday and on Friday a developer theoretically could vest an application pursuant to the prior development standards. If the ordinance takes effect five business day after publication, next Wednesday, that leaves four business days, Friday, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, for a developer to vest an application. The council could take other action on Thursday that would take immediate effect, but five votes are required for an ordinance to take immediate effect. Council President Olson began to make a motion to add back Items 3 and 4 that were deleted so they could be discussed at the special meeting on Thursday, and then concluded a motion was not necessary. 4. ARPA FUNDING STATUS (Previously Item 8.3) Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 5. SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS AND AMENDMENTS TO ECC TITLE 4 LICENSES (Previously Item 8.4) Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. COUNCIL COMMITTEE MINUTES Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes 43 April 19, 2022 Q Page 22 Packet Pg. 328 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Ordinance amending ECC 1.05.010 regarding remote participation by board and commission members Staff Lead: Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Department: City Attorney's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Consider attached ordinance and deliberate re possible action. Narrative For much of the pandemic, the city was required to provide remote access to board and commission meetings. The proclamation requiring that access has now expired. During the pandemic, remote participation became so normal that the city code that limits remote participation may no longer be in keeping with the city's values and objectives. The current code, ECC 1.05.010, limits members to two instances per year of remote participation. The proposed amendment would do away with that limit. But the amendment distinguishes itself from the proclamation era by expressly stating that remote participation is not a right. Other updates are proposed to clarify the process for excusing absences and the bases for possible removal. Attachments: 2022-06-16 Ordinance Removing Limits on Remote Participation by Members of Boards and Commissions v2 (002) Packet Pg. 329 9.2.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 1.05.010 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE TO REMOVE THE LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT MEMBERS OF CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MAY PARTICIPATE IN THEIR MEETINGS REMOTELY AND TO CLARIFY CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATED TO REMOVAL AND EXCUSED ABSENCES. WHEREAS, Chapter 1.05 of the Edmonds City Code provides the basic requirements for attendance and quorums for the city's boards and commissions; and WHEREAS, additional specific provisions regarding quorums and other details are provided for in the respective sections for each board and commission found in Title 10 ECC; and WHEREAS, ECC 1.05.010 has, since 2018, placed a limit on the number of times per year that members of the city's boards and commissions are allowed to participate remotely; and WHEREAS, the necessities brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic have made the use of remote participation technology much more common and acceptable; and WHEREAS, the city, through gubernatorial proclamation, was required to provide remote meeting access during the height of the pandemic; and WHEREAS, now that the proclamation has expired, the city is no longer required to provide remote meeting access; and WHEREAS, the OPMA as revised in 2022 does not require a remote meeting option, but does allow it in addition to an in -person option; and WHEREAS, even though in -person meetings are once again allowed, some members of the city's boards and commissions have expressed a preference to continue participating remotely for health, access, and other reasons; and WHEREAS, the city council finds it to be in the public interest to remove the two -times -per -year limit for remote participation; and WHEREAS, there is no substitute for in -person attendance in building relationships and community, so in -person attendance is highly encouraged by members of the city's boards and commissions; and Packet Pg. 330 9.2.a WHEREAS, the city council acknowledges that an individual's unique circumstances may make remote participation necessary or preferable at times; and WHEREAS, the city's leniency toward remote participation should not be understood by members of the city's boards and commissions (or members of the public) as a guarantee that remote meeting technologies will always work; and WHEREAS, there may be times when a member who opts to participate remotely may not be able to participate in a meeting due to a failure of technology; and WHEREAS, ECC 1.05.010 could also be made more clear by referencing other expectations of the city's board and commission members and possible bases for removal; and WHEREAS, the city council would also like to take this opportunity to clarify that a chair's determination is subject to appeal to the full board or commission under Robert's Rules; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1.05.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Attendance required — Remote Participation," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike througl ): 1.05.010 Attendance required — Remote Participation Allowed. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... . A. In addition to being subject to removal for other particularized grounds as set forth in applicable provisions of the Edmonds City Code and the City of Edmonds Code of Ethics for Board and Commission Members, members of all city boards, commissions and committees (hereinafter "members"), except as set forth herein, shall be removed from office, and the position deemed vacant as set forth in ECC 1.05.020(C) if such member attends less than 70 percent of the regular meetings in any one calendar year, and/or is not in attendance at three or more consecutive regular meetings. Members may participate in board and commission meetings remotely (by telephone, video conference, etc.) up to twe times peF Galen aF „ea and such participation shall be considered attendance for the purposes of this subsection; provided, that any such participation must allow for all other members of the board or commission and any public in attendance to hear the member on the remote device; and provided further, that any member participating remotely must commence participation at the Packet Pg. 331 9.2.a beginning of the meeting and must declare an intention to participate until the end of the meeting. Remote participation is not a right. Reasonable efforts should be made to facilitate remote participation within the limits of the city's personnel and fiscal resources, but technical disruption may still occur. After resuming a remote connection after any technical disruption of said connection, the chair shall determine, subject to appeal, whether a remote member may participate in any action on a matter that may have been discussed during the disconnection, based on the duration of the disconnection, nature of the discussion, etc. B. The chairperson of the particular board, commission or committee may excuse, subject to appeal, any member from attendance at any particular meeting or meetings for reasons that are (1) work related, (2) due to illness or death in the family, of (3) extended vacations in excess of two weeks in length, or (4) technical disruption; provided, however, each such excused absence shall be so noted by the chairperson at the meeting from which the member is being excused and such fact shall be recorded in the minutes along with the reason given for the excused absence by the member. Excused absences shall not be counted for purposes of removal from office, but only if so noted in the minutes as set forth herein. In the absence of the chairperson, the member acting in the chairperson's behalf, such as vice -chairperson or pro tem, shall make the determination, subject to appeal, of whether the absence is excused, and announce the same for recording in the minutes of the meeting from which the member is excused. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Packet Pg. 332 9.2.a CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 333 9.2.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 1.05.010 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE TO REMOVE THE LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT MEMBERS OF CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MAY PARTICIPATE IN THEIR MEETINGS REMOTELY AND TO CLARIFY CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATED TO REMOVAL AND EXCUSED ABSENCES. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 334 9.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Missing Middle Grant Application Staff Lead: Brad Shipley Department: Planning Division Preparer: Brad Shipley Background/History Washington State's 2022 supplemental operating budget directed the Department of Commerce to develop a grant program to support, but not require, the adoption of ordinances authorizing middle housing types, along with a conducting a required racial equity analysis. The grant would provide the city with $100,000 to support this analysis. Staff Recommendation We recommend Council provide a letter of commitment for the grant application to provide funds that supports analysis that is already required and/or anticipated. Narrative Acceptance of the grant funds requires the City to evaluate and consider allowing missing middle housing on 30 percent of lots zoned single family and conduct racial equity analysis. The City anticipates the need to analyze house -scale, missing middle building typologies to meet our 20 year growth projections in association with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update. This gentle density approach is consistent with reasonable measures identified in the Countywide Planning Policies to address lack of developable capacity and is consistent Housing Commission recommendations. Accepting the grant will help fund the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update which requires the city to evaluate housing. Acceptance of the grant does not require the city to adopt missing ordinances to require missing middle housing (see email from Commerce). The attached Q&A provides some answers on the requirements and commitments related to the acceptance of the grant funding. Deliverables required to meet the terms of grant acceptance are expected to include two staff reports and the results from our public engagement efforts. Attachments: Dept -of -Commerce — EmaiI_2022.06.16 Middle Housing Grat Q&A Missing Middle -Grant -Instructions DRAFT Council Letter to Mayor Missing Middle Grant Packet Pg. 335 9.3.a From: Fritzel, Anne (COM) To: Shipley. Brad Subject: Middle housing grant Date: Thursday, June 16, 2022 4:33:52 PM Hi Brad, Thank you for checking on the middle housing grant today. There is no requirement to adopt anything, there isn't time before the end of the state biennium. We are expecting that staff reports and public engagement results would be the major deliverables The majority of the larger cities in the region intend to apply for the funds. If you need more information, here is the address for the grants web page, and scroll down to the second item. The Q&A on the grant program might be particularly helpful. https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving-communities/growth-management/growth-management- rants Anne Aurelia Fritzel, AICP I HOUSING PROGRAMS MANAGER Growth Management Services I Washington State Department of Commerce 1011 Plum Street SE, Olympia, WA 98504-2525 Cell: 360.259.5216 1 Email: Anne. Fritzel (@commerce.wa.gov www. commerce. wa. goy/serving-communitieslarowth-management/ Subscribe for monthly e-mail updates from Growth Management Services. Facebook I Twitter I Linkedln I Subscribe Email communications with state employees are public records and may be subject to disclosure, pursuant to Ch. 42.56 RCW, Packet Pg. 336 Middle Housing Grant Q 6 A ° M a Summary: L ^ , V In the 2022 legislative session, Growth Management Services (GMS) received $7.5 million to create a grant d program for middle housing. In May, GMS formalized the grant program application process, grant a requirements, and provided an informational workshop on May 23, 2022 to discuss the program with potential a� applicants. Approximately 30 city representatives attended the workshop, and asked questions. This Q&A 5 .N captures those questions and answers, and others sent by email, providing an update to the grant program. LA 2 a 06 c� Contents L a MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT PROGRAM PROVISO EXCERPT............................................................................ tm 2 E N 7 WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY MIDDLE HOUSING AND 30%? ° a� HOW MUCH COMMITMENT DOES A CITY HAVE TO MAKE TO GET THE GRANT? .......................................... 4 -a WHAT ARE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES? 6 a� TIMING OF APPLICATIONS AND POTENTIAL LEGISLATION......................................................................... 6 MORE DETAIL ON COMMERCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES................................................. 7 a MORE DETAIL ON WORKING WITH COMMUNITY -BASED ORGANIZATIONS (CBOs)...................................... 7 Packet Pg. 337 9.3.b Proviso excerpt: MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT PROGRAM PROVISO EXCERPT (189) $7,500,000 of the general fund —state appropriation for fiscal year 2023 is provided solely for the department to administer grants to eligible cities for actions relating to adopting ordinances that would authorize middle housing types on at least 30 percent of lots currently zoned as single family residential. For the purposes of this subsection, "middle housing types" include duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, courtyard apartments, cottage housing, and stacked flats. (a) For the purposes of this subsection, a city is eligible to receive a grant if: i. The city is required to plan under RCW 36.70A.040; and ii. The city is required to take action on or before June 30, 2024, to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130(5)(a). (b) Grant recipients must use grant funding for costs to conduct at least three of the following activities: i. Analyzing comprehensive plan policies and municipal code to determine the extent of amendments required to meet the goal of authorizing middle housing types on at least 30 percent of lots currently zoned as single family residential; ii. Preparing informational material for the public; iii. Conducting outreach, including with the assistance of community -based organizations, to inform and solicit feedback from a representative group of renters and owner -occupied households in residential neighborhoods, and from for -profit and nonprofit residential developers; iv. Drafting proposed amendments to zoning ordinances for consideration by the city planning commission and city council; V. Holding city planning commission public hearings; vi. Publicizing and presenting the city planning commission's recommendations to the city council; and vii. Holding city council public hearings on the planning commission's recommendations. (c) Before updating their zoning ordinances, a city must use a racial equity analysis and establish antidisplacement policies as required under RCW 36.70A.070(2)(e) through (h) to ensure there will be no net displacement of very low, low, or moderate -income households, as defined in RCW 43.63A.510, or individuals from racial, ethnic, and religious communities which have been subject to discriminatory housing policies in the past. (d) The department shall prioritize applicants who: i. Aim to authorize middle housing types in the greatest proportion of zones; and ii. Subcontract with multiple community -based organizations that represent different vulnerable populations in overburdened communities, as defined in RCW 70A.02.010, that have traditionally been disparately impacted by planning and zoning policies and practices, to engage in eligible activities as described in (b) of this subsection. SOURCE: Section 189 of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5693, the 2022 supplemental operating budget Packet Pg. 338 9.3.b Questions &Answers WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "MIDDLE HOUSING" AND 30%? Q: The proviso seems to say that the 30% condition is only one of a list of seven activities a community must conduct with the grant funding, while the instructions reads as if the activities chosen must enable middle housing on at least 30% of lots. Is there a discrepancy here, or am I misreading the proviso? A: It is only one of the seven activities, but if you take it off the list, there is no direction about what you are supposed to be doing. (ii) through (vii) follow (i). (i) is very broad in the types of activities that you can do to meet the goal, so there is room for a lot of activities, but the goal is clearly stated. Q: Does a city have to authorize all middle housing types or is a subset of them ok? A: The grant proviso includes a definition for "middle housing types", which includes duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, courtyard apartments, cottage housing, and stacked flats. We suggest considering the whole suite of middle housing types, and think about where they might fit in your community. It may not be appropriate that all types are allowed in all parts of your community. For example, higher intensity types might be more appropriate in corridors or commercial nodes, where 2-3,4 plexes might be more appropriate for low density residential zones. None of the middle housing types may be appropriate in high density centers and transit station areas. The recommendations should take into account your public engagement findings, and document how the suite of middle housing types were considered. Q: How are you calculating the 30%? Does it have to be considered in existing zones, or do we need to develop new zones? And are we calculating based on area or number of parcels? And when do you calculate that? A: We see the complications. The proviso said "lots" but there is definitely room for interpretation. If you are fully platted, you can count all lots. If you have a lot of unplatted land, look at area. There is no requirement to create a new zone. Also, Commerce realizes that many communities already changed their zoning with or without state funds. So any changes to your zoning code since January 1, 2019 (when housing action plan grants first were provided), may be considered in the calculation of 30%. Q: We are struggling with this 30%. Does this refer to platted lots or land area? Could it be 30% of buildable or developable lots? We have issues with changing zoning on newly developed subdivisions. There is a lot of concern and fear from new homeowners if they hear of zoning changes. People are worried. A: The proviso appears to look at the net number of lots, and since middle housing is generally applied by zone, it would make sense to apply by zoning district. However, 30% can be however you work it out, but it appears to be total lots or area in the community. The Buildable Lands Report can help to see what is possible. Q: 30% seems premature with the intentions of the grant to have middle housing conversations, and seems prescriptive. A: The grant program must reflect the language in the proviso. We are requiring that the application show a minimum of 30% of area or lots as a place where middle housing types are considered. Q: How do you authorize the most middle housing types? Would you split some zones to allow more in other areas? How you achieve it is flexible. There is no specific requirement to change existing zones or create new ones. Q: What would the deliverable be when final products are not required? A. The example scope of work shows deliverables as reports on the racial equity analysis, and on the middle housing work. Middle housing grant a Packet Pg. 339 9.3.b deliverables could be draft policies to include in the comprehensive plan update, related to middle housing. Such policies are already required for areas inside the UGA as part of the periodic update. Another deliverable could be recommendations on which zones could accommodate which types of middle housing, or draft changes to zoning codes, permit structures, fees, etc., that could feed into the update. Q: Even to just have those conversations by June of 2023 is a tight timeline. But if conversations are still going on in June 2023 — what would be the deliverables that are being submitted to Commerce? A: The way we think it might work is to include a review of the policies and regulations and structures. The range of things a city could do to address middle housing could include a report that provides the data, analysis, draft policies and recommendations for amendments to the development regulations. Much of this is already required for your housing element update. Q: What if you already meet the 30% threshold? A: That's great! What types of other middle housing work you can do? Can you evaluate fees, permitting processes, and incentives? Could you refine the zoning, design, etc.? What else can you do to incentive or remove barrier to these housing types? c M a a HOW MUCH COMMITMENT DOES A CITY HAVE TO MAKE TO GET THE GRANT? Q: We don't have a commitment from the council to do this amount of work. Does this exclude us from d working on this? What is your guidance for us if we don't have the ability to predict it's not going to go sideways when it goes to council? Council members in Washington and Minneapolis lost their seats over 2 middle housing. A: There is no requirement to adopt the policy changes or zoning code amendments because c the timeline is so short. We assume the legislature wanted cities to have these discussions and understand n where these middle housing types are most appropriate in their community, and propose updates to their 2 policies and regulations. There is enough money that the legislature envisioned every community would have < 08 these conversations. Regarding the City of Minneapolis, recent information is that the city has authorized a about 9,000 housing units since they authorized middle housing on all lots in the city, and only 50 units are r_ middle housing. c� a� c Q: It appears that the grant does not require us to adopt anything. Is that correct? A: Yes, due to the tight time frame, the grant requires certain activities, but should end with recommendations that would be eventually = adopted or incorporated into the periodic update of the comprehensive plan and regulations. Q: Is the letter of commitment from the mayor (or authorized official) required to even be eligible for the grant, or does it only factor into scoring for the "Local Commitment" points? A. A letter of commitment to authorize staff to do the work is required. Unlike the HAP grants, which required adoption of a final result, this E grant, like the majority of growth management grants requires consideration of the proposals, but does not presuppose a final result. We do require agreement from city leadership to work on the issues.. a Q: Do you think it's essentially a non -starter for a city being awarded a middle housing grant if they can't state a commitment to that 30% threshold through their proposed eligible activities under the grant? A: The grant application requires you to submit a zoning map, buildable lands report, and a summary of how you might be considering getting to the 30% threshold. If that shows that it is possible, and that you are considering a minimum of 30% of lots, you would be able to receive the grant. If the map and analysis shows that you are only considering 10 or 20% of lots or area, you are not meeting the minimum threshold for receiving the funds. Packet Pg. 340 9.3.b Q: We thought we would not qualify because we don't have direction from council yet. We are still looking at our strategy for growth. One of their goals is to have more middle housing - but it would put the cart before the horse if we say we have this grant to do 30% of SF lots as middle housing - they will say they have not done the pre -work. A: This grant could be very good for your community to explore your middle housing goal and capacity. The intent is to queue up work in your periodic update. This will help define the goal for middle housing and see where it might work in your community. Q: Our city has a Housing Action Plan (HAP) grant, but we are nervous about changing goal posts. With Vision 2050, we have a certain amount of growth they have to accommodate. The director is nervous about the perception that the two grants are similar but different perspective work products. A: The requirements for a housing action plan and a housing element are similar, and the work required by the middle housing grant is also similar to that needed for a housing element. Here is a chart with the major components Middle Housing Element Housing Action 36.70A.-070(2) (Optional grant to Optional grant to Other (required for all GMA cities and fund many required fund mostly ornmen counties) activities) requiredRCW . Housing projections by income band and a. Housing needs assessment Required for shelters will be provided by Commerce b. Goals and policies..., for Must review housing Middle housing is one Local policies must preservation, improvement, and element. strategy, consider be consistent with development of housing, including policies and zoning, and countywide planning single-family residences, and within Must develop strategies other programs to policies and Vision an urban growth area boundary, for meeting housing needs support middle housing 2050 moderate density housing options including, but not limited to, duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes; Required, and must May consider capacity Jurisdictions inside c.. Land capacity analysis for analyze employment for middle housing the Puget Sound housing trends region should have already completed a buildable lands report d. adequate provisions for all Suggested economic segments, consider housing location relative to employment, ADUs Must address Must address racial Guidance and e.. to h. Address racial displacement discrimination, exclusion technical assistance discrimination, exclusion and and displacement in on this topic will displacement in housing housing come this summer Community Engagement Required Required Implementation Plan Required Q Packet Pg. 341 9.3.b Q: This should be a tool to help with other work. So this will not create new goal posts? A: Correct. This can fund about half of the update requirements for the housing element. A HAP is optional ,and helps support overall housing planning work. WHAT ARE ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES? Q: If we already have a grant to develop code amendments (to do missing middle). Could we use this grant to supplement that grant to do more with addressing equity and displacement and other impediments to middle housing? A: Yes, but Commerce can't pay twice for the same thing — so we just need to clearly document what is covered under one grant and what is covered in another grant. But your other work to address middle housing should be consistent with this grant, considering all middle housing types, and considering on at least 30% of lots. Q: So we do not have to use this funding to create a new zone. Could we create new zone? A: Yes. c 0 M Q: Could we conduct financial analysis of proposed policies to evaluate affordable housing requirements? A. 00 The grant funds can be used to outreach to, communicate with, and educate the community on issued related to middle housing as long as the jurisdiction is using that outreach to evaluate the implementation of middle 2- housing types on at least 30% of the lots currently zoned as single family. If some of that communication includes clear analysis and information on middle housing types, affordable housing, and implementation this could be included in the grant. c Q: Can the grant be used to assess displacement, equity, and other impediments to middle housing like fees, y financing, etc.? A: Yes. Absolutely! Q: Can the final deliverable be only draft comp plan policies, or would it also have to include draft 06 zoning code amendments? A: In looking at the proviso, the language is "$7,500,000 of the general fund —state appropriation for fiscal year 2023 is provided solely for the department to administer grants to eligible cities for a actions relating to adopting ordinances that would authorize middle housing types on at least 30 percent of lots c currently zoned as single family residential. " The list of eligible activities leads with "(i) Analyzing comprehensive plan policies and municipal code to determine the extent of amendments required to meet the = goal of authorizing middle housing types on at least 30 percent of lots currently zoned as single family residential," Policy changes are certainly part of the support for code changes, and it is great time to review policies, but the intent of the proviso is beyond changing policies, it needs to be on the path to adopting ordinances, or changes E in code. You will only have 12 months, so the analysis and shaping potential middle housing will take a while. a A first draft of code amendments would likely be sufficient, or even a list of which specific code sections a would be need to be revised. TIMING OF APPLICATIONS AND POTENTIAL LEGISLATION Q: Could we have more time? A: No. We may ask for re -appropriation of unspent funds, but it is uncertain as this is operating funds, not capital funds (capital funds are what is typically re -appropriated). The current state biennium is July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023. Typically operating funds are to be spent within the biennium. Packet Pg. 342 9.3.b Q: If we choose to submit for the July 5 deadline — will we receive lower priority like the climate grants? A: No, we should be able to fund everyone in this program. Q: Can you speak to missing middle housing bills that didn't pass? A. The middle housing bill (HB 1782) and others did not pass last year. It would have required significant densities around transit services. I have heard the bill may come back next session. We believe this grant program was intended as a voluntary approach at this time. MORE DETAIL ON COMMERCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OPPORTUNITIES Comment: Cities like the sound of technical assistance. We have already come across the lack of capacity in the consultant world. So prepping a clear explanation of what those technical assistance people can do to help cities do the work would be really helpful. ° M Q: Is the interdisciplinary team to help reduce jurisdiction reliance on consultants? A: Yes, we recognize that a it is very difficult to hire consultants, or staff, at this time. The interdisciplinary team is Commerce in-house a assistance to support in-house city staff or hired consultants. The team will be able to help in several ways: i c� • Review existing comprehensive plans and other housing policies and suggest changes • Review your local code and recommend approaches to allowing middle housing • Assisting with community outreach • Completing the racial equity analysis, y • Communications and messaging and a series of videos, presentations and handouts on various 2 housing topics. Q Q: What are you looking for in terms of the pilot studies for middle housing? A: We are looking for communities that have done the policy work for middle housing. We can then hire a national level firm that develops model missing middle housing codes and design guidelines for cities of different sizes. Q: Our council isn't even aware of this need. Can we use the Commerce tech team to present on the need? A: yes! And we have provided slides on the grant program that local planners can use. MORE DETAIL ON WORKING WITH COMMUNITY -BASED ORGANIZATIONS (CBOs) Q: What are the parameters for subcontracting with CBOs? Are there certain eligibility requirements? Do they have to be based in the city? A: There are some guidelines for paying people to attend your meetings. We can find if there are state guidelines for working with CBOs. We will have to get back to you. Q: When we hear "C130" — we hears a cultural identity group, NGO, etc. Is there something more specific or broad this is referring to? A: We will have to do more research to find out that answer. Q: Is it correct that we are not required to subcontract with community -based organizations, but applications that do include that aspect are prioritized? A: That is correct, subcontracting is not required, but consultation is certainly recommended. The proviso says that Commerce shall prioritize applicants who subcontract with multiple Packet Pg. 343 9.3.b community -based organizations that represent different vulnerable populations in overburdened communities, as defined in RCW 70A.02.010, that have traditionally been disparately impacted by planning and zoning policies and practices, to engage in eligible activities as described in (b) of this subsection. Q: Regarding CBO subcontracting funds, application instructions state, "Additional funding requests will be reviewed after the first round of applications are received. " Is this above and beyond the base grant limits listed by city size (i.e. $100K for cities over 20K pop)? Yes. Q: Are there guidelines/limits for this additional CBO funding, and can you share that? There are no limits, but we put $20,000 in the example. We have heard that it can cost $2,000 to work with a community -based organization. So we thought about working with 10 groups. I think you would need to provide enough detail in your proposal to provide clear explanations about the improved engagement, and outcome based on how you would spend the extra money. Q: Should the additional funding for CBOs be explained and requested through the grant applications due o June 9, or will there be a separate request period for that CBO funding? The request should be submitted as the same time. �. a a Q:Can you tell me more about Civic Spark Fellows to help with the work? CivicSpark is an AmeriCorps program operated by CivicWell (formerly the Local Government Commission) in California. Over the last seven years 500+ CivicSpark Fellows have contributed over 500,000 hours of support for hundreds of community resilience projects (e.g., climate action, affordable housing, mobility, and equitable community engagement) with over 250 public agencies. CivicSpark is coming to Washington in the Fall of 2022 and they are looking for local governments and organizations across the state who might be interested in hosting one or more N AmeriCorps Fellows who will spend 11 months supporting local resilience projects including affordable A housing. V a 08 CivicSpark places highly motivated emerging leaders with local organizations for 11-months to support research, planning, and implementation projects for community resilience. CivicSpark Fellows are AmeriCorps L Members selected through a competitive national application process. Fellows have at minimum a college degree in a relevant field, as well as workplace and community service experience. Public agencies, state c agencies, Tribes, and non-profit organizations can contract directly to host CivicSpark Fellows. To date, c housing support projects have generally focused on priorities such as analysis of housing capacity and = inventory, planning for increased housing supply, housing equity programs, and disaster recovery and rebuilding support. Applications are being accepted on a rolling basis, but they encourage interested -a applicants to apply in parallel with the Middle housing grant process (e.g. June 9). The local financial contribution is $29,000, which can be covered by the grant. For a bit more about the program, the background, and the process of getting involved, please see the attached 2 flyer, visit the Washington Partner page, check out a recent MRSC Blog posting at Tapping the Power of a Emerging Leaders for Climate Resilience or reach out directly to Kif Scheuer (kif@farallonstrategies.com). Packet Pg. 344 Middle Housing Grant Program Application Instructions First Application Deadline: June 9, 2022 If applying later, letter of intent should be submitted by June 9, 2022 Revisions to this document, since initial publication are indicated in the orange underlined text. MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 345 9.3.c Table of Contents 1. Grant Overview......................................................................................................................................1 2. Eligible Grant Activities.......................................................................................................................... 2 3. Grant Funding and Technical Assistance Available................................................................................. 3 4. Completing the Grant Application Form.................................................................................................. 5 JurisdictionInformation...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of Work and Project Schedule................................................................................................................................ 6 Budget and Financial Information...................................................................................................................................... 8 Grant Application Questions and Scoring Method......................................................................................................... 9 5. Letter of Commitment.......................................................................................................................... 11 AuthorizingOfficial Letter..................................................................................................................................................11 Community -based Organization Letter(s)......................................................................................................................11 6. Application Format and Submittal Requirements.................................................................................. 11 For more information, please contact.............................................................................................................................12 7. Other Helpful Resources...................................................................................................................... 12 Questionsand Answers.....................................................................................................................................................12 a MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 346 9.3.c 1. Grant Overview Section 189 of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5693, the 2022 supplemental operating budget, directs Commerce to develop a grant program to support the adoption of ordinances authorizing middle housing types, along with a conducting a racial equity analysis. Funding is available only to cities in the Puget Sound region. The proviso alse align` w44 can fund the following bolded requirements to update the housing element of the comprehensive plan as set out in amendments to RCW 36.70A.070(2). Commerce encourages all cities in Puget Sound to accept this funding to be able to do this work they are already required to do by December of 2024. A housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that: (a) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the number of housing units necessary to manage projected growth, as provided by the department of commerce, including: (i) Units for moderate, low, very low, and extremely low-income households, and (ii) Emergency housing, emergency shelters, and permanent supportive housing, (b) Includes a statement of goals, policies, objectives, and mandatory provisions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, including single-family residences, and within an urban growth area boundary, moderate density housing options including[,] but not limited to, duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes; (c) Identifies sufficient capacity of land for housing including, but not limited to, government -assisted housing, housing for moderate, low, very low, and extremely low-income households, manufactured housing, multifamily housing, group homes, foster care facilities, emergency housing, emergency shelters, permanent supportive housing, and within an urban growth area boundary, consideration of duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes; (d) Makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community, including: (i) Incorporating consideration for low, very low, extremely low, and moderate -income households, (ii) Documenting programs and actions needed to achieve housing availability including gaps in local funding, barriers such as development regulations, and other limitations, (iii) Consideration of housing locations in relation to employment location; and (iv) Consideration of the role of accessory dwelling units in meeting housing needs, (e) Identifies local policies and regulations that result in racially disparate impacts, displacement, and exclusion in housing, including: (i) Zoning that may have a discriminatory effect; (ii) Disinvestment; and (iii) Infrastructure availability; (f) Identifies and implements policies and regulations to address and begin to undo racially disparate impacts, displacement, and exclusion in housing caused by local policies, plans, and actions; (g) Identifies areas that may be at higher risk of displacement from market forces that occur with changes to zoning development regulations and capital investments; and (h) Establishes antidisplacement policies, with consideration given to the preservation of historical and cultural communities as well as investments in low, very low, extremely low, and moderate -income housing; equitable development initiatives; inclusionary zoning; community planning requirements; tenant protections; land disposition policies; and consideration of land that may be used for affordable housing. In counties and cities subject to the review and evaluation requirements of RCW 36.70A.215, any revision to the housing element shall include consideration of prior review and evaluation reports and any reasonable measures identified. The housing element should link jurisdictional goals with overall county goals to ensure that the housing element goals are met. Q MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 347 9.3.c 2. Eligible Grant Activities "Middle housing types" include duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, courtyard apartments, cottage housing, and stacked flats. Grantees must choose at least three of the eligible activities that authorize middle housing types on at least 30 percent of lots currently zoned as single family residential. The following activities are eligible for funding: • Analyzing comprehensive plan policies and municipal code to determine the extent of amendments required to meet the goal of authorizing middle housing types on at least 30 percent of lots currently zoned as single family residential. This could involve identifying plan policy changes for the periodic update to align with Vision 2050, countywide planning policies, and the new middle housing and new discrimination and equity requirements for GMA housing elements. This may also include considerations related to parking, design, fee structures, permitting processes or infrastructure considerations related to middle housina. • Preparing informational material for the public. m • Conducting outreach, with the assistance of community -based organizations, to inform and solicit :2 feedback from a representative group of renters and owner -occupied households in residential neighborhoods, and from for -profit and nonprofit residential developers. y • Drafting proposed amendments to zoning ordinances for consideration by the city planning A commission and city council. • Holding city planning commission public hearings and publicizing and presenting the city planning c commission's recommendations to the city council. 3 • Holding city council public hearings on the planning commission's recommendations.' N c • Each city must use a racial equity analysis and establish antidisplacement policies as required under 2 RCW 36.70A.070(2)(e) through (h) to ensure there will be no net displacement of very low, low, or Y a� moderate -income households,' and/or individuals from racial, ethnic, and religious communities which have been subject to discriminatory housing policies in the past. RCW 70A.02.010 (11) defines "overburdened community" as geographic area where vulnerable populations face combined, multiple a� S environmental harms and health impacts, and includes, but is not limited to, highly impacted N communities as defined in RCW 19.405.020. RCW 19.405.020 (23) defines "highly impacted community" as a community designated by the Department of Health (DOH), based on cumulative c impact analyses in RCW 19.405.140 or a community located in census tracts that are fully or partially U on "Indian country" as defined in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1151. Under RCW 19.405, The Clean Energy Q This list of eligible activities comes directly from Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5693 (2022), section 189, with the exception of the text in italics, which support state and regional policy. 'Except specifically calling out extremely low income households RCW 43.63A.510, Washington's Housing Policy Act defines these income groups in the same way as the Growth Management Act. RCW 36.70a.030: Definitions. (wa.gov), MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 K Packet Pg. 348 9.3.c Transformation Act, DOH developed a cumulative impact analysis to designate the communities highly impacted by fossil fuel pollution and climate change. Additional Criteria • Commerce is to prioritize applications which aim to authorize middle housing types in the greatest proportion of zones. Applications should focus on adding middle housing in areas adjacent to more intense station areas, along transit corridors, and in areas that are amenity rich or have opportunities for employment, education, etc. • Commerce is to prioritize applications which plan to subcontract with multiple community -based organizations that represent different vulnerable populations in overburdened communities, as defined in RCW 70A.02.010, that have traditionally been disparately impacted by planning and zoning policies and practices, to engage in eligible activities. 3.Grant Funding and Technical Assistance Available Due to the short timeline and shortage of technical staff and consultants, applicants can request both funds to support staff work and technical assistance from Commerce. Commerce Technical Assistance Team Commerce is offering technical assistance to review comprehensive plan policies, development regulations, proposed amendments, and support the required racial equity analysis. Commerce staff may also provide support through letters and presentations to elected officials, videos, concept papers, and other publications. Applications should clearly indicate in their scope of work if they would like to receive technical assistance and when they intend to access this assistance. Grant Eligibility and Amounts Grants are available to cities within King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties. Additional funding may be requested to subcontract with community -based organizations and to access translation services. Additional funding requests will be reviewed after the first round of applications are received. Base grant amounts are as follows: • Cities under 10,000 population $60,000 • Cities between 10-20,000 population $75,000 • Cities over 20,000 population $100,000 Joint Applications Joint applications from two or more jurisdictions are encouraged where regional groups may work jointly on housing policy. Joint applicants may apply for funding per jurisdiction based on the grant amounts noted above. However, where work can be shared, funding requests should reflect these savings. Joint applicants must designate a lead agency for purposes of grant administration and contracting. The lead city and partner city or cities must meet all the eligibility requirements for this grant. Each joint city may have a separate grant r Q MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 3 Packet Pg. 349 9.3.c agreement through Commerce, due to the need for a separate legislative action by each grantee, in order to receive their portion of the grant funding. Interaction with Other Grants If you have or intend to apply for other grants from Commerce, the agency cannot pay for the same work item more than once. If similar or overlapping activities are in more than one grant, the work items must be carefully defined so they do not duplicate work paid for by another grant by Commerce or another source of funding. +. Grant Timeline • May 9, 2022: Grant applications available. c Application packets posted on the Commerce website: https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving- 0 M communities/growth-management/growth-management-grants/. .2 a • May 16 23, 2022: Pre -application workshop at 3:30 p.m. Applicants are encouraged to attend this pre -application workshop to learn more about the granting program and ask questions. Register at this Zoom link. Any updates to the grant program will be sent a� directly to this list, so we encourage you to register, even if you are not able to attend at the time. A :2 Q&A of questions from the workshop will be developed. c • June 9, 2022: First round of grant applications are due by 5:00 p.m. PST. Completed applications must .N be submitted electronically to gmsgrants@commerce.wa.gov. Applications submitted in Word will be easier to process into a contract, letters of suppert commitment may be submitted by PDF. 0 July 5, 2022: second round of grant applications accepted by 5:00 p.m. PST. Letters of intent for this 3 round should be submitted by June 9, 2022 to gmsgrants@commerce.wa.gov . A letter of intent may N be an email for city staff to gmsgrants@commerce.wa.gov. The email should indicate if the jurisdiction plans to apply, if they would like to request Commerce technical assistance to complete the L requirements, and the budget ask, including the set grant amount and any additional funds needed to a? work with community -based organizations. It should also indicate the timeline for getting a letter of commitment from Council, and any delays in meeting the July 9 deadline. a� c • June 28, 2022: First round of grant awards announced. y Successful applicants will receive an email with notification of grant award. Commerce may work with 2 jurisdictions to clarify specific application information, implementation actions, or discuss adjustments to the grant amount prior to execution of the contract. Monitoring and progress reports will be required as part of the contract. r r • July 1, 2022: Funds Available. An award letter will authorize expenditures from July 1, 2022, and communities may begin to charge work to the grant as of that date, even though a contract may come a little later. • June 15, 2023: Final grant deliverables must be submitted to Commerce. All deliverables must be complete and submitted to Commerce by June 15, 2023. • June 30, 2023: Grant end date. MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 350 9.3.c Final billing and closeout documents must be submitted by this date. 4. Completing the Grant Application Form Summary Page • Provide the name of your city, and the total grant funding requested. • Indicate desire for technical assistance and where in your scope of work it will be accessed. • Provide the names of community -based organizations the city will be subcontracting with. • Provide the information needed to allow reviewers to understand the potential to meet objectives of the grant program. These may be included in the application or attached to the final email, but a narrative should provide a review of the opportunities in your community. o A zoning map showing current zoning. Applicants should make every effort to include as much data on the map or as separate maps/documents to display: Location of transit/station area ■ Location of amenities such as education and employment centers o Detail on what middle housing types are currently allowed in single family or low density residential zones. o The latest buildable lands report showing capacity for new development. o Projections of how your grant will reach the goal of allowing middle housing on at least 30% of lots which currently allow only single family development types. Jurisdictions which have large unplatted areas may use acreage instead of percentage of lots. Changes in zoning since January 1, 2019, may be included as gains in the 30% and will not be counted against progress in this grant. Jurisdiction Information Complete the requested fields and provide jurisdiction information. If two or more cities are jointly applying and collaborating on this grant, submit a separate page for each city. Indicate which city is the lead city for purposes of the grant. Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number: For entities in Washington state, the 9-digit Unified Business Identifier (UBI) is assigned for doing business in Washington state. It is written as "_ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _." Your accounting/finance officer should be able to provide this number or you can search for it here: Washington State Department of Revenue. Statewide Vendor (SWV) Number: This is a nine digit number assigned by the state to your jurisdiction in order for direct deposit/EFT payments. It is typically written as "SWV_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ --" Your accounting/finance officer should be able to provide this number. Contact us for more information. Authorized Official: Please provide the name and title of the official authorized to sign the grant agreement. Usually this is the Mayor. However, it may be a designated administrative officer, such as the city manager, depending on your city's policies and governance structure. Please provide the name and title as it should appear under the grant agreement signature line. 2 MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 351 9.3.c Scope of Work and Project Schedule The application should include a scope of work (SOW) with clear deliverables and a project schedule. This is a performance -based contract, therefore cities will be paid upon satisfactory completion of deliverables rather than hours spent working on the project. Please note this is different than how some consultants currently contract with cities. The SOW should be itemized into actions, steps and deliverables as explained below. It is also recommended that the application include an objective for each part of the project, as explained below. Unless otherwise noted, each of the parts below should have a start and end date. If only a month and year are given, we will assume that the estimated start date is the first day of the first month and the estimated end date is the last day of the last month. • "Actions" refer to the components of the project and typically align with deliverables. They are provided as an organizing element within the scope of work, as shown below. • "Steps" are brief statements about the work activities that this particular portion of the project entails Steps need an estimated end date. Start dates are optional. • "Deliverables" are the final products that the grant and/or portion of the grant will generate. The applicant will need to deliver these products by the dates indicated in the "End Date" column. Start dates are not needed for deliverables, as the start date is the start of the first step leading to the deliverable. Example scopes of work are included below, please note these examples are for illustrative purposes only. When developing your SOW, please be aware that: • The SOW in the grant application will be used to develop a contract when the grant is awarded. • Applicants are not limited to the number of lines represented on the grant application form. Add additional lines as needed. • If an action and/or step is currently in progress at the time you are applying for this funding, clearly document progress to date and detail the tasks that will be carried out using grant funds. Grant funds may be used for any tasks occurring after July 1, 2022. • The final due date for Deliverables must be no later than June 15, 2023. Example Scope of Work Items in Italics are directly from the budget proviso, and require that components of the housing element update in RCW 36.70A.070(2) are included in the SOW. Grant Objective: Develop and adopt an ordinance that authorizes middle housing types on at least 30% of lots currently zoned as single family residential. Steps/ Deliverables Description Start Date End Date Action 1 Public Engagement Activities July 2022 June 2023 Step 1.1 Develop community engagement plan July 2022 August 2022 Step 1.2 ISubcontract with community -based organizations IJuly 2022 ISept 2022 MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 352 9.3.c Inform and solicit feedback from a representative group of Step 1.3 for -profit and nonprofit residential developers, renters and August 2022 May 2023 owner -occupied households in residential neighborhoods. Deliverable 1a Public Engagement Plan July 2022 Sept 30, 2022 Deliverable 1b Public Engagement Results July 2022 May 31, 2023 Action 2 Racial Equity Report July 2022 Jan 31, 2023 Step 2.1 Access supports from Commerce technical assistance staff. Sept 2022 Identify local policies and regulations that result in racially Step 2.2 disparate impacts, displacement, and exclusion in housing, July 2022 Sept 2022 including: zoning that may have a discriminatory effect, disinvestment; and infrastructure availability. Identify areas that may be at higher risk of displacement Step 2.3 from market forces that occur with changes to zoning July 2022 Sept 2022 development regulations. Step 2.4 Evaluate displacement risk of very low, low, and moderate Sept 2022 Nov 2022 income households. Evaluate displacement risk of individuals from racial, Step 2.5 ethnic, and religious communities which have been subject Sept 2022 Nov 2022 to discriminatory housing policies in the past. Step 2.6 Evaluate displacement risk of locally owned businesses. Sept 2022 Nov 2022 Develop policies and regulations to address and begin to Step 2.7 undo the impacts of local policies and regulations that July 2022 Dec 2022 result in racially disparate impacts, displacement, and exclusion in housing. Develop anti -displacement strategies, including strategies Step 2.8 to minimize displacement of low-income residents July 2022 Dec 2022 resulting from redevelopment. Develop anti -displacement policy documents that include a Step 2.9 schedule of programs and actions to implement the anti- Nov 2022 Dec 2022 displacement strategies including a timeline. Deliverable 2a Racial equity analysis report Dec 30, 2022 Deliverable 2b Proposed policies to address anti -displacement Jan 31, 2023 Action 3 Zoning amendments Nov 2022 June 2023 Step 3.1 Review and evaluate the current housing element and Nov 2022 Jan 2023 other policies to support middle housing. Review buildable lands report and current residential land uses for potential to allow middle housing, or where station Step 3.2 areas or higher intensity uses might be defined, or where Nov 2022 Jan 2023 commercial areas might be converted or residential or mixed use development. Q MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 353 9.3.c Review current programs, development regulations, impact Step 3.3 fees, system development charges, and permitting Nov 2022 Jan 2023 processes as to how they might encourage or discourage the development of multiunit housing. Consider bonus densities and incentives for affordable Step 3.4 housing to accompany any changes in zoning that increase Jan 2023 Feb 2023 density. Gather data, analyze and review to understand the realistic Step 3.5 potential of the various changes. Conduct financial Jan 2023 Feb 2023 feasibility analysis of developing new various housing typologies in various zones. Middle housing staff report on changes needed to support middle housing including recommended Deliverable 3a changes to policies, regulations, fee structures, June 15, 2023 incentives and permitting procedures for consideration with periodic update. Deliverable 3b Draft middle housing ordinance. June 15, 2023 Budget and Financial Information In the budget table, provide detailed information about the project's cost by assigning a cost to each deliverable in the scope of work. Commerce recommends the budget for each deliverable be based on the expenses estimated by the city and/or chosen consultant. If a grant is awarded, budget amounts can be adjusted before the final contract is executed to align with consultant expenses. In the budget narrative, provide estimates of staff hours for each deliverable, staff hourly rates, and other expenses to support the requested funding amount. Budget managers should be aware that the final twenty percent (20%) of the grant amount is contingent upon completion of the final deliverables (i.e., draft middle housing ordinance). Grant applications should include detail that shows the level of effort and funding required for each deliverable under the scope of work. This information is discussed in more detail in Section 5 below. Budget amounts should reflect the inclusion of Commerce's technical assistance. Sample Budget for Middle Housing Ordinance Deliverables Commerce Funds Deliverable 1a: Public Engagement Plan $5,000 Deliverable 1b: Public Engagement Results $15,000 Deliverable 2a: Racial equity report $20,000 a MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 Packet Pg. 354 9.3.c Deliverable 2b: Anti -displacement policy documents $10,000 Deliverable 3a: Middle housing staff report $30,000 Deliverable 3b: Draft middle housing ordinance $20,000 Total: $100,000 Cities may request additional funds for contracting with community -based Commerce Funds organizations and translation of project materials.3 Contracting with community -based organizations $20, 000 Grant Application Questions and Scoring Method Commerce will award grant funds proportionate to the level of effort proposed by a city and the potential increase in middle housing allowed in the city. All grant applications will be scored and ranked on the following criteria. a. Readiness to Proceed: (20 points) How ready is your jurisdiction to complete this project in a timely manner? Please describe your plan to initiate and complete the project by June 15, 2023. • If already developed, include the timeline for your periodic update, and how this work will intersect. • Identify work already completed to identify vulnerable populations, overburdened communities, and develop anti -displacement strategies. • Provide key policies that support middle housing. Identify the key staff or consultants who will be implementing the project along with their history regarding their ability to successfully complete other grant projects. If you plan to hire a consultant but have not started the process, please indicate this and the status of that work. If you plan to use Commerce technical assistance indicate this as well. b. Local Commitment to the Project: (20 points) Indicate the level and type of support that the appropriate legislative body will provide to the project. For example, include the amount of staff time and/or funding that is committed to the project as well as other funding and "in -kind" support. • Include a letter from the mayor or authorized official committing the city to the project. • Jurisdictions should also submit letters from community -based organizations they plan to subcontract with, which indicate willingness and capacity to participate. (See Section 6 — Letter of Commitment below.) 3 Additional funds for contracting with community -based organizations above the base grant award may be requested with initial grant application. These funds will be determined during contract development, based on the requests received. Y Q MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 L•] Packet Pg. 355 9.3.c c. Racial Equity Analysis: (30 points) Each city must use a racial equity analysis and establish anti -displacement policies. Include a detailed statement discussing the general direction of this work, how you will tailor the approach to your community. If you are already aware of the potential for displacement of very low, low, or moderate - income households, or past discrimination in land use against households from racial, ethnic, and religious communities, include a brief statement of work to date, and how this grant will be used for the purpose. You may document this by sharing the current areas which have been identified as geographic areas where vulnerable populations face combined, multiple environmental harms and health impacts, and includes, but is not limited to, highly impacted communities designated by the Department of Health based on cumulative impact analyses. Include screenshots of the maps or other information to support your narrative. d. Middle Housing Opportunities: (30 points) • Commerce will prioritize applications which aim to authorize middle housing types in the greatest proportion of zones. Discuss how other tools, fee structures and incentives will support the zoning. • Applications should focus zoning amendments in areas that are amenity rich and adjacent to transit. How will your work strengthen existing transit investments? How will this work make the most of other amenities in the community? Your work should consider the need for appropriate intensity of land use at and adjacent to high capacity station areas (such as future high -intensity zoning). Summary of Criteria Points Readiness to Proceed 20 points Local Commitment to the Project 20 points Racial Equity Analysis 30 points Middle Housing Opportunities 30 points Total 100 points r Q Applications are scored based on the responses to questions. After scoring, the applications are ranked by total points. The scores, together with the total number of applications received and the size of the community, will assist in determining the grant funding and any adjustments needed. Applications will be considered based on the answers to the auestions and potential to implement middle housing. Additional funding may be available. MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 10 Packet Pg. 356 9.3.c 5. Letter of Commitment Authorizing Official Letter (REVISED LANGUAGE) A letter of commitment from the city mayor, or other authorized official, should accompany the completed application form. The letter from the mayor should include the following language: Mayor of , authorize the city to propose the attached scope of work and budget request for Middle Housing Grant funding to consider policy, zoning and development regulation code strategies to allow middle housing in our community. We acknowledge the grant threshold to consider middle housing types on at least 30% of the lots which only allow single family development at this time. We understand that the periodic update, due December 2024, requires us to adopt policies related to moderate density housing options, including, but not limited to duplexes, triplexes and townhomes, and this funding will help us meet this requirement. We also acknowledging this work is required to address new components of the housing element to address past racial discrimination, exclusion and displacement in housing. [Include proposed grant objectives or actions. Mention how the work plan fits with the vision and goals of the community and include a short description of efforts already underway to support the work.] Community -based Organization Letter(s) A letter of commitment from the executive director, board chair, of other official from each community -based organization should accompany the completed application form. The letter should include the following language: Our organization [does this]. We represent [this group] in the City of . We agree to participate in the middle housing grant and update of the housing element work, including the racial equity analysis. 6. Application Format and Submittal Requirements The maximum length of the main application form is 12 pages, not including zoning and/or other maps and letters of commitment. This should be submitted in word so that it can easily be turned into a contract. The letters of commitment should be scanned and attached, or have a scanned signature of the mayor or individual within the organization authorized to sign this letter. The letters of commitment may be submitted within a reasonable time period after the application deadline, but before the grant award. Please include a note in your email when those letters might be submitted. Applications must be submitted electronically as an attachment to an e-mail to gmsgrants@commerce.wa.gov. Attachments to e-mail shall be in Microsoft Word format or PDF. Zipped files cannot be received by Commerce and cannot be used for submission of proposals. a MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 11 Packet Pg. 357 9.3.c will confirm receipt of emailed applications. Applications should not be mailed in hardcopy or transmitted using facsimile transmission. All proposals and any accompanying documentation become the property of Commerce. For more information, please contact: • Anne Fritzel, GMS Housing Program Manager Phone: (360) 259-5216 Email: anne.fritzel@commerce.wa.gov • Laura Hodgson, Senior Planner Phone: (360) 764-3143 Email: laura.hodgson@commerce.wa.gov c 0 • Grants Email: gmsgrants@commerce.wa.gov a Q r 7.Other Helpful Resources • A list of anti -displacement strategies collected from community HAPs are available here (required with RCW 36.70A.600(d)). a, • Anti -displacement guidance is available in Chapter 5 of the Guidance for Development a Housing S Action Plan. Questions and Answers 0 Answers to potential questions about the Middle Housing Grant Program are below. 2 1. If a city currently is currently working on a HAP or HAPI grant which includes a racial equity analysis and development of anti -displacement strategies, does that disqualify them or lower their competitive chances of getting a grant under the 21-23 biennium? No. However, since Commerce is already paying for the racial equity analysis under another grant, we expect the middle housing grant funds to be used for additional work to achieve the grant objectives. You will need to indicate in your application that this work is already being completed under another grant. 2. If awarded, would funding cover work prior to the date of contract execution? Yes, invoices may include work starting July 1, 2022. 3. If a city shows intention to adopt zoning and development code changes to allow development of middle housing in a greater percentage than 30% of lots that currently allow only single-family development, could they apply to receive more funding? No, the proviso states the funding is to support communities to adopt zoning changes in at least 30% of lots. MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 12 Packet Pg. 358 9.3.c 4. If a zone currently allows attached and/or detached accessory dwelling units in single family zones does that zone still qualify as currently allowing only single family development? Yes, the additional dwelling unit is only allowed as an accessory to the primary unit on the lot. Middle housing types for this grant include duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, courtyard apartments, cottage housing, and stacked flats. S. Can the grant be used to pursue strategies that are in an adopted HAP? Grant funds can be used to analyze comprehensive plan policies and the municipal code to determine the extent of amendments required to meet the goal of authorizing middle housing types on at least 30 percent of lots currently zoned as single family residential. Grant funds may also be used to develop and adopt middle housing types in more zones, and may include review and revisions to: • Existing housing policies • Development regulations and fee structures • Design regulations • Infrastructure investment strategies • Define station areas and transit corridors for more intense development (generally higher densities than middle housing) • Density bonuses and affordable housing incentives Basicallv anvthine that would suaaort the eoal of more middle housine in more Darts of communities. 6. How does this grant connect with VISION 2050 and new middle housing requirements for GMA housing element? This grant provides support for communities to implement many of the policies in VISION 2050, including providing a range of housing types and choices (MPP-H-2), expanding housing capacity for moderate density housing to bridge the gap between single-family and more intensive multifamily development (MPP-H-9), and "identify[ing] potential physical, economic, and cultural displacement of low-income households and marginalized populations that may result from planning, public investments, private redevelopment, and market pressures" (MPP-H-12). Similarly, the middle housing grant will help communities to achieve part of the new requirements of the updated GMA housing element, namely to consider middle housing opportunities in growth area boundaries (b and c) and implement sections (e) through (h) of RCW 35.70A.070(2). 7. Can a jurisdiction decide during this grant -funded work to access the technical assistance offered by Commerce if it was not indicated in the SOW submitted with this application? Yes. Even those communities that choose not to accept a grant would be able to access technical assistance from Commerce. MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 13 Packet Pg. 359 9.3.c 8. What is this technical assistance? Due the tight market for contractors (and planners), and the tight timeline for this grant, Commerce will hire experienced technical experts to help staff planners do this work more quickly and easily, and provide state support. This will include 0 Three staff to help with: • Review of comprehensive plans and develop policy recommendations • Review of development regulations and recommendations for amendments • Communications, trainings and messaging • Outreach to underserved communities • Racial equity analysis 0 National level consultant to help with individual community codes 0 A series of videos, handouts and PowerPoints aimed at residents, planning commissioners and elected officials to inform about the issues, state requirements, and the policy choices available at the local level, using examples as appropriate. 0 Commerce's work to develop guidance around sections (e) through (h) of RCW 35.70A.070(2) will become available in August 2022, which will be directly applicable to this grant. a MIDDLE HOUSING GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Date Published: May 9, 2022 14 Packet Pg. 360 9.3.d DRAFT LETTER June 21, 2022 Mayor Mike Nelson 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Middle Housing Grant Program Dear Mayor Nelson: This letter of support from the City Council grants you authorization to accept the $100,000 Middle Housing Grant from the Department of Commerce on behalf of the City of Edmonds This letter becomes active if Council passes a motion to provide a letter of support during the June 21, 2022 meeting. Sincerely, Vivian Olson Council President Edmonds City Council Packet Pg. 361 9.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Ordinance amending ECC 5.27.210 regarding Fireworks Fines Staff Lead: Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Department: City Attorney's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Consider attached ordinance and determine whether it should be sent to consent or full council. Narrative The state fireworks law is set forth in chapter 70.77 RCW. The City's fireworks regulations are codified in chapter 5.27 ECC. The penalty for violating the City's fireworks regulation was updated in 2020 with Ordinance 4194. The 2020 update included language related to public safety and education assessments (PSEA). Ordinance 4194 did not quantify the PSEA in dollars. The PSEA amount was substantial enough that, when combined with the new penalties imposed by Ordinance 4194, some concern has arisen that the fines may now be higher that the council may have understood. When one includes PSEA the total financial obligation for a first offense would be $1,025 instead of $500, which is the base fine. PSEA is a state required (see RCW 3.62.090) additional assessment that gets added on to almost every fine imposed by the court. It is calculated based on percentages of the base fine. If the council wants the total financial obligation for a first offense to be $500, then the base fine would need to be reduced. The city council should review the amount that PSEA adds to the current fines. If the council finds the total amount to be acceptable, then no further action by the council is necessary. If the council finds the total amount to be more than desired, then the attached proposed ordinance would correct that situation by including the PSEA amount within the fine. In other words, the attached proposed ordinance would effectively reduce the base fine for a first offense to $243.90, resulting in a total financial obligation of $500. Note that if a violator requests a mitigation hearing, the court has discretion to reduce the base penalty if the circumstances warrant reduction. The court can also set up a payment plan or convert the penalty to community service hours. The court does not, however, have the discretion to remove the PSEA component of a fine. Attachments: Ordinance Fireworks Penalties Packet Pg. 362 9.4.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PENALTIES ASSOCIATED WITH VIOLATING THE CITY'S FIREWORKS CODE. WHEREAS, the state fireworks law is set forth in chapter 70.77 RCW; and WHEREAS, the City's fireworks regulations are codified in chapter 5.27 ECC; and WHEREAS, the penalty for violating the City's fireworks regulation was updated in 2020 with Ordinance 4194; and WHEREAS, the 2020 update included language related to public safety and education assessments (PSEA); and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4194 did not quantify the PSEA in dollars; and WHEREAS, the PSEA amount is substantial enough that, when combined with the new penalties imposed by Ordinance 4194, it makes for total amount that is higher than what the city council supports; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 5.27.210 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Penalty and violations," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in A. Except as otherwise provided in subsection B of this section, violations of this chapter shall be punished as a non -traffic infraction, punishable by a fine of five hundred dollars, PROVIDED THAT —.A the base fine set forth herein shall be adjusted so that the total amount of the financial obligation to the violator is five hundred dollars after including all public safety and education assessments (PSEA) required by state law shall to be added to the base fine described herein. Remission of PSEA money shall be as set forth in state law and cannot be suspended or waived. The municipal court shall have Packet Pg. 363 9.4.a discretion to assess additional penalties for failure to pay or respond to notices of infraction issued under this section as otherwise allowed by law. B. Any person violating or failing to comply with the provisions of this chapter which does not also constitute a violation of state law for the second time within five years, and any subsequent violations within five years, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000 and/or jail not to exceed 90 days, PROVIDED THAT if fines are imposed the base fine set forth herein shall be adjusted so that the total amount of the financial obligation to the violator is one thousand dollars after including all public safety and education assessments (PSEA) required by state law to be added to the base fine described herein.; Any violation of this chapter which also constitutes a violation of state law shall be punishable under state law penalties. In addition, any fireworks that are involved in the violation may be confiscated. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: Packet Pg. 364 9.4.a OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 365 9.4.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PENALTIES ASSOCIATED WITH VIOLATING THE CITY'S FIREWORKS CODE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 Packet Pg. 366 9.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Tree Code Amendments Staff Lead: Deb Powers Department: Planning Division Preparer: Deb Powers Background/History Trees provide multiple benefits that contribute to a healthy, vibrant, and livable community. Recognizing this, Edmonds has taken steps to proactively manage its urban forest resource, including the adoption of an Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP). The UFMP is a guidance document outlining specific actions towards achieving a healthy, sustainable urban forest. Its goals are meant to be implemented by City boards/commissions, the City Council, the community, or City divisions/staff over a long-term horizon, as resources allow. In late 2020, the Planning Board (PB) set out to achieve UFMP Goal 1A: Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban forest and consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations. The PB made its recommendation for development -related tree codes Oto the City Council in 2021. In response to public feedback, the PB also recommended to the City Council that a second phase of code amendments, outside the scope of UFMP Goal 1A, address property owner tree removals not related to development activity. The City Council concurred and expressed a desire to consider regulating property -owner tree removals. A detailed description of the 2020-2021 tree code amendment process is available on the City's Tree Code Updates project webpage. Staff presented the following six options limiting tree removals on private property at the May 18, 2021, City Council meeting. Note that the discussion of options did not take place until the June 1, 2021, City Council meeting. Staff has added the expected results for each option below in italics, based on information from similar code application in other jurisdictions. 1. Require a permit/fee to remove any significant tree. A fee permit would be required for the removal of any significant tree on private property. ('Significant' trees are defined as those with a minimum 6-inch DBH (trunk diameter measured at 4.5 feet above grade). With this option, there would be a cost to the property owner. Additional resources for permit review would be required. There may be a negligible effect on the rate of tree canopy cover loss. 2. Allow limited tree removal with notification. Allow the removal of a certain number of significant trees within a specific timeframe. For example, two significant trees may be removed from a property, per year. This option would not require a paid permit but would involve establishing a process for notification/City approval to track the number of trees removed over time and check for additional conditions, such as critical areas. With this option, there would be no cost to the property owner. Additional resources would be required for intake of notifications and to check that other limitations do not apply. This option would slow the rate of canopy cover loss over time. Note that in other jurisdictions, this option is typically paired with a minimum remaining number of trees on the property and/or tree replacement requirements - see #5 and Packet Pg. 367 9.5 6. 3. Allow limited tree removal with notification, except for Landmark trees. Same as #2 above, but the allowance would only apply to trees less than 24-inches DBH. This option assumes that a permit would be required to remove Landmark trees over 24-inches DBH (as described in #4) that further limits the number of Landmark trees and/or increases the time periods between Landmark tree removal. The property owner would need to provide documentation on tree size for City review of proposed tree removals. As with #2, there would be no cost to the property owner. Additional resources for the intake of notifications, including tree size documentation, would be required. Limiting Landmark tree removal would further slow the loss of mature tree canopy cover over time. Note that currently, Landmark tree retention or removal is not regulated in Edmonds. 4. Reauire a permit/fee to exceed tree removal allowances and/or to remove a Landmark tree. To exceed the allowed number of tree removals within a given timeframe in #2 and/or to remove a Landmark tree in #3, a permit would be required. The additional trees would need to meet certain criteria to allow their removal, such as hazard or nuisance tree (note that hazard and nuisance trees are currently defined in Chapter 23.10 ECDC). The number of Landmark tree removals and frequency of their removal would be limited more than the allowances described in #3. Here's an example of how this option would work, if 2 significant tree removals were allowed per year: say a property owner has 5 significant trees on their property and they wish to remove all 5. Two trees would automatically be allowed to be removed. Three trees would need to fit hazard or nuisance criteria for all 5 to be approved for removal at one time. A permit/fee would be required in addition to documentation of the hazard or nuisance condition for 3 trees. If none of the 5 trees fit nuisance or hazard criteria, only 2 trees could be removed under the allowance. The property owner could, however, remove 2 more trees after a year had lapsed, then remove the fifth existing tree on the property after another year had lapsed. If any of the 5 trees were Landmark trees, a permit/fee would be required. The number of Landmark tree removals that could occur at once and frequency of their removal may be limited, too. Option #4 effectively slows the loss of canopy cover over time yet allows property owners to remove hazardous/nuisance trees as needed. Limiting Landmark tree removal would further slow the loss of mature tree canopy cover over time. Significant resources would be required for permit review and to field -verify nuisance/hazard/Landmark tree documentation. 5. Establish a minimum threshold of trees remaining on the property. In tandem with any of the above options, there could be a requirement to retain a certain number or percentage of existing trees on the property. Currently, Edmonds' tree code requires 30% tree retention on properties under development. Other jurisdictions establish a certain number of existing trees that must remain on the lot depending on the property size. To remove the last remaining trees required on the lot, a permit would be required and/or the existing trees must meet certain criteria such as hazard or nuisance tree. Alone, this option establishes a "baseline" of tree canopy cover on a lot -by -lot basis. It may also serve as the trigger for tree replacements when combined with Option #6. 6. Require tree replacements with removal. In tandem with any of the above options, significant tree removal by property owners would be mitigated by planting new trees. The appropriate number of replacement trees and the threshold that triggers tree replacements would need to be established. Other jurisdictions require a certain number of tree replacements based on the size of the removed trees. When combined with Option #5, tree replacements would only be required when the property owner is removing the last remaining trees on the lot. This option mitigates the loss of tree canopy cover associated with property owner tree removal over time. Resources would be required to inspect and field -verify replacement trees. Packet Pg. 368 9.5 Although the June 1, 2021, City Council meeting minutes reflect that the City Council did not provide a consensus decision, the discussion does indicate there was general support for tracking tree removals to gain more information and a preference for Options 2 and 3, summarized as: With the exception of Landmark trees, allow the removal of a limited number of trees on a given property within a certain time frame, with no or low permit fees, in a manner that allows data on tree removal activity be derived. The August 24, 2021, City Council meeting minutes indicate that the Council felt sufficient direction was provided to staff on "Phase II" code amendments for the PB and Tree Board to move forward with draft code development and public engagement. The Phase II tree code amendment project has been identified in the 2022-2023 Development Services Work Plan. City Council Considerations In addition to establishing property owner tree removal codes, the City Council may want to consider minor code changes that simplify the current code, align with industry standards/BMPs and respond to findings in the recent Tree Canopy Assessment. "Minor" code changes do not change the meaning of the code and do not result in increased applicant requirements. In contrast, "major" code amendments result in a substantial prohibition/ban on what's currently allowed, add substantial new requirements that result in significant changes to procedures, and/or add significant costs to the applicant and changes the intent of the code. To clarify, the prior direction provided by the City Council for tree removal not related to development constitutes a major code amendment. Staff noted in reviewing the related meeting minutes that there was a concern for how and when urban forest management actions that are outside the regulatory approach of tree code development would be taken. For that reason, the continued implementation of the Urban Forest Management Plan has been added as an objective under the scope of this project. Staff Recommendation Affirm that the project scope for Phase II code amendments to Chapter 23.10 ECDC is defined by the following objectives: 1. Pursue code updates to address property owner tree removals under the City Council's preferred Options #2 and 3. 2. Address issues that have arisen with administering the current code and respond to findings in the recent tree canopy assessment with minor code changes to Chapter 23.10 ECDC. 3. Continue to implement the UFMP. Next Steps No action is needed at this time. Staff will continue working with the Planning Board and Tree Board. Attachments: CC Memo 5_18_21 Tree Code Part 2 CC Minutes 6 1 21 CC Minutes 8 24 21 Packet Pg. 369 9.5.a °V EDA, o� �' Edmonds City Council Agenda Memo /'7c. I S90 Meeting Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Subject: Tree Code Stage 2 Staff Lead / Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager Author: Introduction During review of the development related tree regulations update in the first half of 2021, the City Council expressed a desire to expand the scope of the tree regulations. Staff identified a number of Stage 2 tree related actions (Exhibit 1). A few of these identified actions could pertain to subsequent code development including tree retention on private property (not related to development), view corridors, wildlife & habitat corridors, and a Heritage Tree Program. Before embarking on the next stage of tree code development staff and the Planning Board will need direction from the Council on the potential approaches to pursue during code development. Tree Retention on Private Property Not Related to Development The Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) notes that about 83% of the City's canopy is located on private residential properties. Given that the preponderance of the City's urban forest is located on private property, these properties are critical in meeting a goal of no net loss of the City's urban forest canopy. Goal LA of the UFMP provides: A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban forest and to consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations Stage 1 one of the tree regulations update focused on this first goal in the UFMP. Interest was expressed from members of the Planning Board, City Council, and public in expanding tree regulations to address trees on private property that is not being developed and does not have critical areas present. Some options for tree retention code on private property include those below. Note that most, if not all, of these options would require more resources (staffing, consultants or both). c W E c m E a 0 0 U W L City of Edmonds caR City Council Packet Pg. 370 9.5.a 1. Require a fee permit for removal of any significant tree (6 inch or larger DBH) on private property. This option would require additional staff resources. 2. Allow the removal of a certain number of significant trees on a given property over a certain time period. For example, two significant trees may be removed from a property per year. This option does not require a paid permit but would require submittal and approval by the City to track tree removal to ensure more than the allowed number of trees are not removed. This option will require additional staff resources. 3. Allow for the removal of a certain number of trees with a diameter of less than 24 inches diameter at breast height (DBH) to be removed on a given property over a certain time period. Similar to number 2 above, but only allows the removal of smaller trees without a paid permit. More documentation will need to be provided to the City with this option to review the diameter of trees proposed for removal. 4. Require a paid permit for removal of more than the allowed number of trees over a certain period of time or trees with a 24 inch or great DBH. For this option and number 1 above, criteria will need to be established for the permit review. When would the City deny a requested tree cutting permit? Or is it just allowed with a permit? Do the permitted tree removals require replanting where the allowed tree removals do not, thus a fee is required for the additional review? 5. For all of the above options, review could include a review of tree retention as in Chapter 23.10 ECDC. Does a property need to retain at least 30% of the trees with the allowed removals in Options 2 and 3? Or only when a permit is required? 6. Consider whether all residential properties should be required to have a minimum number of trees or tree coverage, perhaps with certain exceptions. Heritage Tree Program Goal 1.D of the UFMP is to develop a voluntary Heritage Tree Program. A Heritage Tree Program is a way to recognize unique or special trees and to recognize stewardship of the urban forest by local property owners. While the UFMP notes a voluntary Heritage Tree Program, the level protection provided to designated heritage trees is not noted. Below are some options for consideration with a Heritage Tree Program. 1. A completely voluntary program where a property owner must sign a nomination form for a specific tree and provide protection of the tree while it is designated as a heritage tree. However, if the property owner so desires, the heritage tree may be removed from the heritage tree program and removed consistent with the City's adopted tree regulations. This is similar to the Edmonds Register of Historic Places where the property must sign a nomination Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 371 9.5.a form and follow certain rules while a property is on the register, but the property owner also has the option to remove a register property. 2. A voluntary program where a property owner must sign a nomination form. Then once a tree has been designated as a heritage tree, that tree must be protected and could not be removed unless the tree became a hazard or 3. Another less voluntary option would be to allow tree to be nominated as a heritage tree and protected without the owner signing a nomination consent form. There are some serious property rights issues that would need to be evaluated if this option were pursued. View Corridors During review of the tree regulations, several comments were submitted concerning trees obstructing views. The UFMP recognizes views are an important aspect of living in Edmonds (at least in some areas) but does not provide any specific goals related to view protection. The City's Comprehensive Plan and policies recognize the protection of public views (views from parks or view corridors down streets and street ends) but does not specifically address private view protection. View protection may be established through private view protection easements limiting the height of vegetation and structures on one property to protect views on another. Private view easements may be purchased and are sometimes set up during a subdivision or before a person sells a piece of property. These easements are private easements however and not regulated or enforced by the City of Edmonds. Enforcement of view easements is a civil matter between the property owners to which the easement applies. Should the City pursue regulations regarding trees and views, it should be noted that the City would then become an arbitrator between two (or more) property owners. To some people, trees are the view while to others trees block the view. Below are some options for consideration in incorporating some view aspects into the tree regulations. Furthermore, Washington State has very strong protections granted to private property rights, and the City will have limited ability to enforce restrictions on one property to protect the view afforded another. 1. Not all areas of the City are blessed with views. The City may consider establishing "view sheds" or "view areas" within the City where views are given extra consideration when a tree planting plan is being developed. Options for the "view areas" may include: a. Limiting the mature height of trees being planted to the allowable height of the zone in which the tree is being planted. In single family zones, this would mean that trees planted in a "view area" could not be taller than 25 feet when that tree reaches maturity. This is a blanket approach which Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 372 9.5.a may have unanticipated down -sides, such as not allowing for native species that grow taller. b. Require a "view corridor" over a percentage of the property line where trees could not be planted. For comparison, the Shoreline Master Program requires a view corridor be maintained across 30 percent of the average parcel width. This would not result in an unobstructed view, but will preserve some view while allowing the planting of trees that reach a taller mature height. 2. Establish "view areas" where trees may be removed if they grow up into a view. The City could establish a process where a property owner who has lost views that once existed when they purchased the property to require the trees on their property that have grown into their view to be removed or trimmed to reestablish the view. If the City pursues developing regulations with regard to private views, other factors such as critical areas must also be taken into consideration. For example, north Edmonds view shed is associated with significant slopes (potential landslide hazards are slopes 40% and greater) as well as a historic landslide area that has specific regulations that apply to development in that area (Chapter 19.10 ECDC — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas) in addition to critical area regulations. The mechanical and hydrogeological benefits which trees and other vegetation provide to maintain slope stability and reduce erosion are well documented. Equity Issues Edmonds is a varied city that has developed over many years. In some areas, large swaths of native trees have been cut — as part of intense urban development or sometimes to afford maximum views. Elsewhere, many trees remain, due to limited incentives to remove them or perhaps the landscape did not encourage their removal (e.g. steep slopes or stream corridors). If the City pursues regulating trees on private property beyond what is already done through the critical areas code, equity concerns should be considered. For example, is it fair to insist that those property owners who have large stands of trees remaining be solely responsible for the continued cost of tree maintenance and upkeep while those who have already cleared their property (whether for view or other considerations) do not bear any costs? A balancing of private property rights with public benefit and an equal sharing of related costs needs to be part of the discussion. Wildlife & Habitat Corridors Protection and enhancement of wildlife & habitat corridors was raised during review of the tree regulations. While tree retention is important everywhere, it is particularly Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 373 9.5.a critical in the stream and wildlife corridors. These areas are largely protected by the City's critical area regulations. However, much of the City was developed prior to the establishment of critical area or other environmental regulations. One option to improve wildlife and habitat corridors would be to work with landowners to improve the quality of the City's stream and wildlife corridors. Currently, the City's stormwater crews are the primary contact with streamside landowners and have been providing landowners with best management practices such as the information provided on the City's stormwater website. The City could also partner with organizations like Stream Keepers to help educate streamside property owners. Over the past several years the City has been supporting Students Saving Salmon which has been doing excellent documenting the state of the City's streams and working with property owners and streamside maintenance and planting. A percentage of the tree vouchers from the Tree Fund program could be targeted for planting within stream and wildlife corridors. The City's critical area code has regulations regarding corridor protection in the wetland section (ECDC 23.50.040.F) and the 30% native vegetation requirement in ECDC 23.90.040.0 is intended to help protect wildlife and habitat corridors. If the intent is to protect, enhance, expand, or establish wildlife corridors in upland areas not associated with critical areas more information and criteria for the type of habitat we are trying to protect or establish needs to be determined. For instance, the critical area code defines "habitats of local importance" as: areas that include a seasonal range or habitat element with which a given species has a primary association, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term. These might include areas of high relative density or species richness, breeding habitat, winter range, and movement corridors. These might also include habitats that are of limited availability or high vulnerability to alterations such as cliffs, talus, and wetlands. In urban areas like the city of Edmonds, habitats of local importance include biodiversity areas and corridors, which are characterized by a framework of ecological components which provides the physical conditions necessary for ecosystems and species populations to survive in a human -dominated landscape. These habitats of local importance are usually associated with a "species of local importance" which the critical area code defines as: those species that are of local concern due to their population status, their sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or that are game (hunted) species. No species of local importance or habitat of local importance has been identified in the City of Edmonds. If the City wants to pursue establishing wildlife corridors beyond those currently described in the critical areas regulations and best available science report, additional studies will be required. Page 5 of 6 c aD E c aD E a 0 U Packet Pg. 374 9.5.a Other information that will be important for improving wildlife and habitat corridors will be the canopy assessment the City will be conducting. The canopy assessment could identify existing corridors and areas where planting should be a priority for providing connections that may have been lost. Incentives No net loss cannot be achieved via regulation alone. Apart from Goal LA of the UFMP which relates to developing regulations to retain trees during development, there are no goals in the UFMP that address developing regulations for private property that are not being developed. Rather the UFMP Goal 3 discusses developing incentives for private property. Goal 3 provides: Goal 3 - Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the city recognizes that voluntary public participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective. A. Have a program of giving away trees and/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds B. For properties that retain a certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore establishment of: A property tax "rebate" applicable to the City portion of property taxes; and/or ii. A stormwater utility fee reduction; and/or iii. Other techniques that provide a financial recognition of the benefits of tree planting and protection. C. Develop a certification/awards program to publicly recognize property owners that maintain a certain amount or type of healthy trees Rather than pursing the regulations for tree retention on private property not related to development, the City could focus its efforts on developing incentive programs for protecting and planting trees on private property. Even if the City pursues tree regulations for private property not related to development, it should be combined with incentive programs. Page 6 of 6 c aD E c m E a 0 U a� aD L Packet Pg. 375 her a picture of a DADU and it looks like just another house. She was concerned about upzoning and not having transition zones. Citizens need to know where and how rather than everything being carte blanche. Hearing no opposition, Ms. Hope assumed there was Council consensus to proceed with those items and schedule a special study session. 3. STAGE 2 TREE ISSUES Development Services Director Hope said this is a follow up on an issue the Council has considered over several months. The Council adopted new regulations related to development following up on the UFMP and other work. Council has also been interested in doing things beyond that. Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained when the Council was working on tree code regulations that applied to developing sites, a number of Stage 2 items were identified for future updates. Some are underway now and nearing completion such as Inventory of Downtown Trees, Street Tree Plan Update, and Tree Canopy Assessment. He displayed a list of Upcoming Tree -Related Items and Timing, explaining the shaded items will go to the Planning Board and the Planning Board has requested clear direction from Council on those items. Item Timing Inventory of downtown street trees Q2 2021-Q3 2021 Inventory of other public trees 2022 or TBD Street Tree Plan update Q2 2021-Q4 20221 Tree canopy assessment Q2 2021-Q3 2021 Heritage Tree Program Q32021-Q4 2021 Tree Canopy Goal Q3 2021 Assessment of staffing and other resource needs Q2 2021 -2022 or TBD Incentive program using stormwater utility fee reductions Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Exploration of other incentive programs 2022 or TBD Open sace acquisition Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Tree retention on private property (not related to development) Q4 202 Partnerships with other organizations Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD Annual reports on City tree activities Q2 2021 Treegive-away program 2022 or TBD View corridors 2022 or TBD Wildlife & habitat corridors Q3 2021-Q4 2021 Expanded public education & Information Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD Stormwater & watershed Analysis Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Other tree -related issues 2022 or TBD Mr. Lien reviewed: Tree Regulations on Private Property o Goal 1 - Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage The city has limited information about the condition of the urban forest. Success with this objective will be achieved with enhanced management of public trees and a deeper understanding of the population of trees on private property. The following actions will support this objective: A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban forest and to consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations o Goal 3 -Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property c m E c m E a a� 0 U m m Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2021 Page 16 Packet Pg. 376 9.5.b To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the city recognizes that voluntary public participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective. Equity o Edmonds is a varied city that has developed over many years. o In some areas, large swaths of native trees have been cut — as part of intense urban development o Elsewhere, many trees remain, due to limited incentives to remove them or perhaps the landscape did not encourage their removal (e.g. steep slopes or stream corridors) o Equity concerns should be considered o A balancing of private property rights with public benefit should be considered Options for Tree Retention on Private Property Not Related to Development 1. Require fee permit for removal of any significant tree (6 inch DBH) 2. Allow X number of trees on a given property to be removed over a period of time 3. Allow X number of trees less the 24 inch DBH to be removed over a period of time 4. Require paid permit for removal of more than the allowed number of trees and for removal of 24 inch DBH trees 5. Review retention requirements for all of the above, or only when permit is required? 6. Consider whether all residential properties should be required to have minimum number of N trees m Heritage Tree Program o UFMP Goal LD Develop a voluntary heritage tree program m 1. Completely voluntary program. Designated Heritage Tree to be removed from Heritage E a Tree Program at owners desire a� 2. Property owner voluntarily designates Heritage Tree, but Heritage Tree must be protected v and only removed if hazard or nuisance 3. Anyone may nominate a Heritage Tree regardless of property owner's consent and Heritage Tree must be protected Views N. o UFMP recognizes views, but does not include in specific goals related to view protection o Public view corridors vs. private view protection o City would be arbitrator between property owners o State has strong protections regarding private property rights and city will have limited ability to enforce restrictions on one property to protect the view afforded another o Other considerations include critical areas View Options o Establish "view sheds" or "view areas" a. Limit mature tree height to allowable zoning height b. Require a "view corridor" over a percentage of the property line where trees could not be planted o Establish process where trees may be removed if they grow into a view in a "view area" o If city pursues regulations regarding private views other factors need to be considered such as critical areas Habitat Corridors o Largely protected by critical areas o Education ■ Stormwater crews ■ Partner with organizations such as Stream Keepers and Students Saving Salmon o Critical area Habitat and Species of Local importance o Tree canopy assessment Incentives o Goals 3 — Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2021 Page 17 Packet Pg. 377 9.5.b To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the City recognizes that voluntary public participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective: A. Have a program of giving away trees and/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds B. For properties that retain a certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore establishment of: i. A property tax "rebate" applicable to the City portion of property taxes; and/or ii. A stormwater utility fee reduction; and/or iii. Other techniques that provide a financial recognition of the benefits of tree planting and protection. C. Develop a certification/awards program to publicly recognize property owners that maintain a certain amount or type of healthy trees Mr. Lien relayed staff was seeking direction from direction from Council on what they wanted to see in the Stage 2 Tree Update related to the options for tree retention on private property not related to development: Councilmember Buckshnis asked why it was necessary to charge any fees when the goal was to keep track of trees being cut down. She asked why the City would want to require a fee permit for 6 inch tree. Mr. Lien referred to the list of options on page 186 for tree retention on private property not related to development. He was not recommending a fee, but that was one of the options for Council to consider. With that option, if someone wanted to remove a tree, a permit could be required with a minimal fee. E Options 2 would not require fee permit but would require documentation. Property owners would be allowed to remove X trees of any size per year; it would not require a permit or fee, but documentation a would need to be submitted so the City could track it and ensure they were not asking to remove more than the number of trees they were allotted. Option 3 would allow property owners to remove X number of o smaller trees. Option 4 would require a permit to remove more than the allowed number of trees or removal v m of 24" DBH trees. If permits are required for removal, even the 24" DBH trees, it will be necessary to L establish criteria; why would the City say no to removing those trees, are they allowed outright, is a permit ~ required to review a replanting plan, etc. Options 5 and 6 refer to retention requirements and a minimum N number of trees on the property. He summarized a fee permit for any tree removal is option as well as no r fee but documentation. co Councilmember Buckshnis preferred Options 1, 2 and 3. She recognized those will be labor intensive and asked whether an analysis had been done regarding additional staff. Ms. Hope said the exact amount of staffing depends on which option the Council selects. There would need to be an urban forester or arborist position to oversee this as well as 1-2 additional staff or more if a more complex process was selected. There are a lot of costs associated with tracking regardless of whether a fee is charged. Councilmember Buckshnis commented on the unintended consequences she has witnessed with the emergency ordinance regarding 24" landmark trees. Homeowners reporting their neighbors to the City for cutting a big tree. She wanted citizens to feel comfortable that they could remove some trees and to understand the environmental reasons for retaining trees. She preferred a no fee permit and only monitoring. Ms. Hope recalled some Councilmembers were interested in staff talking with people who wanted to cut trees and explaining their options. That is a great idea but will also require staff resources. Council President Paine agreed with either free or low cost permitting for trees. She supported some type of permitting process so the City can track what is happening with trees. Before adopting requirements, it will be important to have the canopy assessment to provide a measurement. The Council can then determine a canopy goal/target and how to reach that canopy. Education will be helpful to many homeowners. The program will require resources include urban forestry staff, code enforcement, permit review, and staff who to provide education. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2021 Page 18 Packet Pg. 378 9.5.b Council President Paine asked if the Planning Board was seeking direction from the Council about a Heritage Tree Program. Ms. Hope said the Planning Board was interested in direction from the Council about a Heritage Tree Program. Mr. Lien said the Heritage Tree Program is separate from regulations for tree retention on private property. The Heritage Tree Program would be a recognition type program, two separate code updates. The Planning Board is seeking direction from Council regarding tree retention on private property not related to development. He provided the six options to give Council something to consider. Councilmember Olson agreed with not requiring a fee. She recalled Bill Phipps referencing Kirkland's code and what he like about it was there was no fee and the city took responsibility for planting elsewhere for some of the trees being removed. There is greater incentive for a property owner to identify the trees they want to remove and get counsel from the city arborist or other knowledgeable source regarding alternatives to removing a tree. The time the Council has spent on the tree code has been very valuable and she thanked staff and citizens for being patient with the time it takes to synthetize inputs and develop good policy. Some of points that have resonated with her are the difficulty to enforce prohibitions, people who are determined to take trees down and people who love trees and therefore bought property full of trees and end up being penalized. Councilmember Olson referred to the question raised during Audience Comments about why the City is c m E doing this. She said the environmental component was the driver, trees are an important part of carbon sequestration and a component in climate change. Protecting the tree canopy not only helps with that but a also enhance the aesthetics. With regard to a Heritage Tree Program, she would support a site specific tree program and if it is required in the UFMP, she would support a voluntary program. With regard to views, o she referred to vegetation used as a fence. The City legislates how high fences can be, and if someone uses v m vegetation as a fence, it should not be allowed to be 20 feet tall and block their neighbor's light or view. L Mr. Lien said the City has regulated hedge height in the past, but that was removed from the code before ~ he came to the City 13 years go. Regulating hedge height requires the City to be arbitrator between N neighbors; one person wants the hedge for privacy and the other wants the hedge removed for view reasons. r Councilmember Olson commented the code could be clear if vegetation used as a fence blocked views, it co needed to comply with the fence height regulations. That did not mean a property owner could not have a tree in that area, but they could not use a hedge as a fence. Councilmember K. Johnson thanked Mr. Lien for taking a comprehensive look at the Tree Code Stage 2, incorporating a range of options and asking the Council to narrow it down for the Planning Board. She was unsure if that was what staff wanted or if the Planning Board wanted to continue to look at the range of options. Ms. Hope said staff was not asking Council to eliminate any of the options tonight, but to determine next steps for the Planning Board to begin that work. All the other items will come back to the Council in the future. Mr. Lien said the Planning Board was seeking clear direction from the Council regarding what direction to go and what to look at. Tree retention on private property not related to development is the most difficult. If the Council wants to pursue a Heritage Tree Program, that is pretty easy and there are a few options. With regard to tree retention on private property, Council appeared to be interested in an option that did not require a fee; tracking tree removal with no fee. Additional Council direction is needed regarding when a permit is required, whether it is above X number of trees or is it not allowed and a property owner can only remove two trees, or is it limited by size, etc. He asked when a permit would be required. Councilmember K. Johnson agreed with moving the Heritage Tree Program to the Planning Board. She was also interested in wildlife and habitat corridors, relaying her understanding that they were protected under the critical area ordinance but there are large trees in parks and other areas so she encouraged the Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2021 Page 19 Packet Pg. 379 Planning Board to tackle that issue. Wildlife and habitat corridors are important for the tree canopy as well as salmon recovery efforts. Council President Paine agreed with having the Planning Board look at a Heritage Tree Program. She supported a free or low cost tree permit for removal of any significant trees, and suggested having the Planning Board consider Options 2 and 3 along with data from the canopy assessment. She also agreed with looking at wildlife and habitat corridors. Councilmember Distelhorst agreed with providing general direction to the Planning Board regarding Options 2 and 3 and have them consider a no cost tracking permit. The clock is ticking on the emergency ordinance so there is some pressure to ensure the 24" and larger trees are addressed via an update from the Planning Board that will come to Council. He expressed support for Option 1 for a Heritage Tree Program. He has seen how some of the more restrictive options such as Option 3 have been used with buildings where people have applied for landmark status on something they do not own and have no interest in and how that has been weaponized. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with a Heritage Tree Program. She recalled the Floretum Garden Club and the Tree Board had discussed that and Councilmember Olson provided an example of program that did m not need to be codified. She supported doing districting or establishing view/no view areas in the UFMP. E Edmonds' real estate market is flourishing and houses with trees are priced differently than houses with views. She was not sure how to diplomatically address view versus no view in the code. She agreed with a focusing on wildlife and habitat corridors, no net loss and net ecological gain. A lot of it is related to critical areas but there are also wildlife corridors in non -critical areas. With regard to incentives, she was concerned o with opened up a ball of wax, especially related to stormwater issues. She summarized habitat, permitting v m and view corridors were her top three. L Councilmember L. Johnson recommended approaching this as a shared responsibility; the overwhelming responsibility should not be on one subset of the community or homeowners over another. She agreed with Options 2 and 3 for tree retention on private property not related to development, noting the canopy assessment will guide that. The canopy assessment will also guide Option 6, whether all residential property should be required to have a minimum number of trees. Without the information provided by the canopy assessment, it is difficult to decide. With regard to a Heritage Tree Program, Councilmember L. Johnson supported Options 1 or 2 related to a voluntary program. With regard to view corridors, this is related to the equity issue and providing a balance. A number of properties have already been cleared, is it fair to put the burden on those who have not yet removed trees? It will be a delicate balance and will depend on the canopy assessment. She questioned what constitutes a view corridor, observing there are a lot of different views. She referred to comment related to light and asked whether access to light was prioritized for someone living in a view corridor but not for other homeowners which she felt was an inequity issue. The City does not want to be in the business of defining and regulating views and should leave that up to homeowners to do amongst themselves. With regard to wildlife and habitat corridors, she cited the importance of education and incentives. She supported certification for wildlife and habitat corridors similar to a Heritage Tree Program. She was not sold on incentives but neither did she want to rule them out. She would support incentives that were easier to do and did not require as much staff time to monitor. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was not prepared to provide her arguments for and against options tonight. She misunderstood what the Council was doing with this agenda item and will not be stating her preferences but is listening to everyone else and has a good understanding of their priorities. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2021 Page 20 Packet Pg. 380 9.5.b With regard to the issue of light, Councilmember Olson agreed that related to equity; it could arise anywhere and was not exclusive to the bowl. Blocking light can be an issue for someone's garden. She strongly favored incentives, agreeing they were complicated to figure out but that was the way to go. The environment is important, and instead of spending money on enforcement and punishment, she preferred to provide incentives for having the right tree in the right place. She felt the City could get better results with incentives rather than punishments. Mr. Lien said he did not assume the Council would complete this tonight; it was intended to provide some guidance. The Council has provided clear direction on the Heritage Tree Program. The direction regarding tree retention on private property not related to development seemed to be no permit but tracking for the removal of a certain number of trees. He will come back to Council to discuss views and habitat corridors in more depth so Council can provide clearer direction. Council agreed. Mr. Lien referenced comments regarding light, noting some jurisdictions have regulations related to solar access.. Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. He relayed Council President Paine and he conferred during the recess and decided Item 8.5 would be postponed to a future meeting. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:15 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 17.75 ECDC, ENTITLED "OUTDOOR DINING," AND A RELATED SECTION IN CHAPTER 17.70 ECDC Development Services Director Shane Hope advised this is not about outdoor dining on sidewalks or streets. Planning Manager Rob Chave advised this is a Planning Board recommendation on an interim ordinance Council adopted at the end of December related to outdoor dining. Although the ordinance was listed, it was not included in packet. He displayed the one -page ordinance and explained on private property, dining is allowed as an outdoor use. Until the interim ordinance, an additional 10% of the indoor seating was allowed as outdoor seating or 12 seats whichever was greater and beyond those limits a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was required. He commented 10% of the interior seating or 12 seats was not very much and especially during COVID, it came to the City's attention that restaurants needed more flexibility. A CUP goes to the Hearing Examiner and costs thousands of dollars and takes up to three months for approval, making any significant outdoor dining cost and time prohibitive for a typical restaurant/small business. Mr. Chave explained the interim ordinance adopted by Council removed the requirement for a CUP, clarified the need for a building permit for any structures, and for retaining any ADA accessible parking spaces. The original code did not have a limitation on the amount of outdoor dining; the interim ordinance had a limit up to 50% of the existing interior seating and up to 30 seats. The interim ordinance was more generous than what was allowed without a permit, but not as open ended as the original code. The Planning Board held a public hearing and recommended making the interim ordinance permanent. A public hearing at City Council is scheduled on June 15t'' Councilmember Buckshnis asked how 30 seats versus 40 or 20 was decided when the original was 12. Mr. Chave it was 12 or 10% of the indoor seating whichever was more. Thirty seats seemed like a reasonable number, it could be lower or higher. The 50% was not a magic number but it clearly indicates that outdoor dining was to be a secondary part of the overall operation, not the main part. Under the interim code, the additional outdoor dining could be 50% of the interior or 30 seats. For example, a small takeout place with just a kitchen and no interior seating could have 30 outdoor seats. c m E c m E Q a� 0 U m m L Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2021 Page 21 Packet Pg. 381 9.5.c when they get to Edmonds, but there will be subtext via color, font, and other elements that can match and contrast to tell a story about Edmonds. He recognized it was important to the Council to have cohesiveness with the existing signs and certain elements should resonate, but they do not have to be exactly the same. The team will do their best including more outreach to determine if the signs are on right track and bring that information back to Council. Councilmember Buckshnis said she liked the vertical signs better than the horizontal signs. The city of Shoreline is on 205t' and the Edmonds sign will be across the street. She agreed the signage should be unique and she like inspiration signage that brings color, texture, artistic. 2. LANDMARK TREE ORDINANCE EXTENSION City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained there is an ordinance in the packet that was presented for Council consideration; however, he recommend the Council not take action on it tonight because the Council needed to have a public hearing before it can be extended. Mr. Lien and he had a discussion about the ordinance when he was heading out of town on vacation and did not had the statute in front of him. He apologized for not realizing that earlier. When this ordinance was first adopted, there was a thought that N only six months would be needed to develop something more permanent and move on to adopting a permanent regulation governing landmark trees. The City is obviously not at that point. His recollection E was staff has sought direction regarding where the Council wants to go or what staff should be trying to draft, but the Council has not yet given staff clear direction to staff on that issue. From his perspective the E Council was not even close to being able to adopt a permanent regulation governing landmark trees. 0 To frame the discussion, Mr. Taraday suggested after hearing from Mr. Lien tonight, the Council deliberate on whether they want to reprioritize some work in order to get a permanent landmark tree code developed in the next six months which he understood would require a significant reprioritization of �- work, or whether to just allow things to return to the way they were six months ago and allow the N landmark tree regulation process to work its way through the normal course of business. There is a lot of N work going through the Planning Board and Planning Department and it was not clear to him whether this ci was a high enough Council priority to be the subject of another interim ordinance. If so, he requested the Council advise staff. He was concerned that in the absence of a priority change and given the trajectory that this effort has been on, there could be repeated extensions without making any real progress which is not how interim regulations are intended to be used and he would advise against doing that. c) Environmental Program Manager Kemen Lien said the key part of what Mr. Taraday said related to the timeline for the next stage of the tree code. The general direction received during the first stage of the tree code update was the Council wanted a tree code that applied more broadly to all properties in the City whether they was being developed or not. The first stage of the tree code update was implementing the first goal of the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP), update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban forest and consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations. Clear direction was provided on that and the first update was tree regulations that strictly focused on development. He provided that focused code update to the Planning Board last September and the Council adopted the last version in July 2021, a total of 10 months. If there is a tree regulation that will apply more broadly throughout the City and have a larger impact/reach, Mr. Lien said that type of update needs to have broad public engagement and will take more time. Staff does not have a lot of clear direction regarding that next stage. The interim ordinance that was being considered tonight was for landmark trees but during discussion of the next stage, there was interest in reviewing all tree removals. There was also discussion about potential view impacts but not a lot of clear direction. Another approach would be to begin the public engagement before drafting code; getting input from Edmonds citizens regarding what they would like to see in a tree code that applies more broadly and weave that into the next phase of the code update. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 24, 2021 Page 15 Packet Pg. 382 9.5.c Mr. Lien advised that interviews were conducted for the urban forest planner position yesterday and an offer will be made to a really good candidate. It will likely be at least a month before that person can be hired. Having one person solely focused on trees will help this move forward rather than adding it to his job. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was currently not at home so she did not have the history of the Tree Board's efforts at hand. She recalled there was a designated timeframe and she asked for that to be sent to her today. She expressed concern that suddenly staff was saying Council had not provided clear direction, but she felt the Council had. She would like to further define the language in the flexible subdivision design in 20.048.075. She was perplexed by tonight's discussion and asked if the intent was to start over at square one and what happened to all the planning documents initiated through the Tree Board and the Council last year or this year. Mr. Lien said the code Councilmember Buckshnis was referencing was 20.75.048, the flexible subdivision design; that is in code and has been adopted. That first stage of the code update was based on Goal 1A of the UFMP strictly focused on reducing clear cutting and other development impacts on the urban forest. When Stage 1 of the code update started, staff presented the scope to Council in July 2020; began discussion with the Planning Board in September, the Planning Board held a public hearing in E December and forwarded a recommendation to Council in January 2021 and the Council begin discussions in January//February. During that review, there were a lot of comments that the code update E a was not broad enough and needed to be expanded to cover situations beyond development. In June 2021, staff brought back the Stage 2 topics to be considered such as tree removal not associated with v development. A few options were discussed at that time. With regard to review on other properties, there was consensus that the Council wanted that review, but not what that review would look like such as requiring a permit for all tree removals. With regard to views, the discussion was all over the board regarding how views would be addressed in the next stage of the update. He concluded many of the topics Ni were discussed, but he did not feel clear direction was provided at that time. N Councilmember Buckshnis asked if he was referring to clear direction from Council or from citizens. She i 00 thought Council has been giving clear direction for a long time. Mr. Lien answered from the Council. Councilmember Buckshnis said the Council approved 20.75.048 but never any language for amendments. c She would like to discuss and refine the development aspect of things. The landmark tree ordinance is V backfiring because trees are going down all over and there is no enforcement. She recalled she did not v vote the last two times because it penalizes citizens instead of developers. She thought Stage 2 of the tree code would be done by September/October and now it sounds like there's nothing. She concluded she E was completely mystified. Councilmember K. Johnson inquired about enforcement since there was a moratorium for landmark trees. Q Mr. Lien answered staff has been implementing the landmark tree interim ordinance; landmark trees can still be removed if they are nuisance or hazard trees. Staff has been reviewing arborist reports with regard to nuisance and hazard landmark trees. Staff does enforce the tree code including the landmark tree interim ordinance. People call frequently when tree cutting is occurring and planning staff, code enforcement or building officials in the field visit those properties. Mr. Lien clarified some of the tree cutting that has occurred since the interim ordinance went into effect was the result of developments vested prior to adoption of the new tree code and prior to the effective date of the interim ordinance. Subdivisions have five years from preliminary approval to begin development; for example, a development that was approved 2-3 years ago under the old tree code is just now getting to the development stage and removing trees. He assured staff was enforcing the tree code and the interim ordinance. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 24, 2021 Page 16 Packet Pg. 383 9.5.c Councilmember K. Johnson asked how many violations had been cited. Mr. Lien answered he knew of two violations in regard to the interim ordinance, only one may have been related to the landmark tree ordinance or potentially the other moratorium on subdivision properties that restricted cutting trees on properties being subdivided. He did not think any were related to the landmark tree ordinance, one was a critical area and the other was related to the moratorium ordinance. Councilmember K. Johnson asked how practical this moratorium has been. Mr. Lien answered it has prevented 24" trees from being removed. The word is out, staff get calls all the time from property owners that haven't heard about it until told by their neighbor. Nuisance and hazard 24" trees are being cut as well as trees on developments vested prior to the adoption of these codes. Councilmember K. Johnson commented it was great news that an urban forester had been hired. She supported getting more public input even after this has been discussed for years. She personally thought the moratorium had done more harm than good; she hears so many trees being cut down in her neighborhood and although they may not be landmark trees, the word is out, if you want to get rid of a tree, do it now. She would not support this ordinance when it comes back because she believed more needed to be done to protect citizens and there needed to be better enforcement. She loves trees, particularly protecting large native trees, but did not see that this has accomplished that goal. She will E keep her mind open to that possibility based on Mr. Lien's comments, but she did not see that the moratorium had done what it was intended to do, save trees. E a Councilmember Olson said she came to tonight's meeting with three reasons for not supporting this and aD v Mr. Taraday's comments addressed a lot of them. She originally voted for a six-month Band-Aid until a m code for private property could be developed because that seemed reasonable, but not only has that part of the code not been started, a public input process is planned which she totally supports. Ms. Seitz' comments have been valuable to her thought process and there are things that could help direct a code that Ni is better received and more incentive based rather than enforcement based. She also expressed concern N with treating this like an emergency ordinance when it wasn't and holding a hearing until after fact. From 001 her personal case studies, she did not share the opinion that this has been more of a positive than a negative. Possibly some bigger trees are being protected, but there are a lot of big trees between 12-24". She recalled three parties making comment to the effect that they were going to take down the 12-24" trees before they would be protected forever. She was not sure the bigger trees were always the better v trees. She supported the ordinance originally, believing it was a reasonable thing to do, but no longer v believed it was serving the purpose of protecting and encouraging the tree canopy and is working counter to that. She did not plan to support the ordinance tonight and was unlikely to support it in the future. E Councilmember Distelhorst said he would definitely like see it prioritized as he preferred not to regulate through ongoing temporary extensions. He voiced his support for a reprioritization if necessary so there can be a permanent code regarding landmark trees, trees that have been here the longest, can be here into the future and take the longest to grow. Recognizing the exponential benefit these trees provide, he was interested in prioritizing a long term landmark tree code and expressed support for shuffling work if necessary. Council President Pro Tern L. Johnson said she was also perplexed because she remembered sitting through numerous Council meetings and meeting with directors on this and being repeatedly shown a schedule of how this would be accomplished and the Council providing input. This emergency ordinance was supported by the Administration. The message the Council is receiving now is totally different than the message they received before. She has been communicating her desires to protect the old growth as much as possible. It was not particularly comfortable protecting them through emergency ordinance and she had hoped the City was well on the way to a real plan to accomplish this and now is hearing staff has Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 24, 2021 Page 17 Packet Pg. 384 9.5.c no idea what the Council wants. She recalled staff describing at meetings how this would be accomplished and other meetings where Council provided feedback. She concluded she was really confused and said there needed to be better communicating between the two branches. Mayor Pro Tern Paine expressed frustration, commenting this was the first she was hearing about this and feared a lot of momentum had been lost. She was unclear where the momentum was lost, recalling the City was marching down a great path, having an interim approach to preserving the largest trees, the ones that will not easily grow back due to the climate crisis. So much progress has been made this year; it was a priority for the Administration and the Council to do tree preservation in large blocks. She said some of her questions have never answered; for example, how many permits are vested where everything can be removed, including every last blade of grass. Mr. Lien said he did not have that information, but could track it at least for subdivisions that are vested and maybe multifamily sites. Mayor Pro Tern Paine said it was terribly frustrating to see large swaths of trees coming down. Another thing the Council wanted to prioritize was the use of incentives such as stormwater fees to reduce the impact of preserving tree canopy. The Council has been supportive of alternative methods and doing updated subdivision planning for land use practices to build housing in a more creative way. She did not want to throw the baby out with bathwater and did not understand why the process was returning to zero. E She asked when the tree canopy assessment would be available, anticipating that would assist with database decision making as most properties are privately held and not under development. Mr. Lien 4) answered the tree canopy assessment is underway and should be completed by the end of September. E a Mayor Pro Tern Paine asked for a practical timeline to complete Stage 2 of the tree canopy work. She aD v acknowledged it involved the Planning Board and other staff and Administration time. She recalled there was a path to get this done in a year or so. She recognized COVID had slowed things, and asked what would be a reasonable time to go through the Planning Board and public hearings. Mr. Lien asked if she was talking about the code or the canopy assessment. Mayor Pro Tern Paine answered she meant the Ni Stage 2 of the code. Acting Development Services Director Rob Chave said there is a short summary in N the cover memo in the packet describing some of the things that are underway. The problem is there are a 001 lot of moving parts. Staff has been working on a number of things such as the tree canopy assessment, street tree plan, establishing a tree fund, and hiring a urban forest planner who can devote all their time to this effort. The one thing that will take the most time because it will require a lot of public outreach is any c 2 code regulating private property which is different from a landmark tree ordinance. He recalled the last V time a proposal generated by the Tree Board came forward, it created a hailstorm of criticism from v general public. c Mayor Pro Tem Paine interrupted, saying she was on the Tree Board at that time and part of their charter was a comprehensive tree code which included private property. Mr. Chave said a lengthy public outreach is critical before bringing forward a tree code that addresses what happens on private property. The Planning Department has been inundated with people asking questions, wanting assessment done of their trees, etc. There is a lot of engagement by the community but there are a lot of different opinions and it is difficult to know what the community expects until that outreach is done. The regulations related to landmark trees can be completed sooner, but without clear direction regarding regulating trees on private property, it will take a lot of time to figure out. There are a lot of pieces of the tree code that are moving forward, but the private property piece, other than landmark trees, is a big question mark. Mayor Pro Tern Paine asked what would be required and how much time would it take to resuscitate and extend the landmark tree interim ordinance one more time. Mr. Taraday answered the Council can use the ordinance in the packet to do that, there just needs to be a public hearing first. The only real question is how quickly that public hearing can be noticed and he deferred to Planning staff to answer that question. Alternatively if that timeline was not acceptable, the Council could entertain the possibility of an Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 24, 2021 Page 18 Packet Pg. 385 9.5.c emergency ordinance of a different scope adopted at a special meeting in the next few days that would take immediate effect. The exact same substance cannot be adopted without first holding a public hearing. Mr. Lien advised the soonest a public hearing could be scheduled would be September 14t' if notice was sent to the Herald tomorrow. Councilmember K. Johnson relayed two requests, 1) Mr. Taraday hold an executive session to discuss the legal ramifications; this had been requested but it had not been scheduled, and 2) consider alternatives to the landmark tree moratorium, specifically ways to incentivize retaining landmark trees. The Council has typically put aside $300,000 in the budget for open space; the Council could consider during the budget process making one-time payments to people who own landmark trees to reduce their taxes. She was interested in alternatives that were more palatable, helpful and positive to the community. Council President Pro Tern L. Johnson requested an update on what was referred to at one time as upcoming tree related items and timing. She recalled this was last reported to the Council on June 1st and was what the Council has been using to gauge progress. The upcoming tree related items included view corridors, open space acquisition, and other things that staff mentioned earlier that they had not received direction on. She disagreed that direction had not been given. She requested an update on that timeline and whether the timing of some items needed to be adjusted from what was reported in June. Mr. Lien He displaved State 2 Upcoming Tree -Related Items: Item Timing Inventory of downtown street trees Q2 2021-Q3 2021 Inventory of other public trees 2022 or TBD Street Tree Plan update Q2 2021-Q4 20221 Tree canopy assessment Q2 2021-Q3 2021 Heritage Tree Program Q3 2021-Q4 2021 Tree Canopy Goal Q3 2021 Assessment of staffing and other resource needs Q2 2021 -2022 or TBD Incentive program using stormwater utility fee reductions L Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Exploration of other incentive programs 2022 or TBD Open space acquisition Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Tree retention on private property (not related to development) Q4 2021 Partnerships with other organizations Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD Annual reports on City tree activities Q2 2021 Tree give-away program 2022 or TBD View corridors 2022 or TBD Wildlife & habitat corridors Q3 2021-Q4 2021 Expanded public education & Information Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD Stormwater & watershed Analysis Q4 2021-2022 or TBD Other tree -related issues 2022 or TBD Mr. Lien explained the above was a timeline developed by former Development Services Director Shane Hope. He commented on the items highlighted in gray which were discussed at the June 1st Council meeting: • Heritage Tree Program - clear direction was provided about moving forward and it will potentially be completed in Q4 2021 • Incentive program using stormwater utility fee reductions - identified for Q4 2021 — 2022 • Tree retention on private property - will require robust public engagement. Director Hope identified that as potentially being completed in Q4 2021; when this list was developed, he thought that a little ambitious. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 24, 2021 Page 19 Packet Pg. 386 9.5.c • \View corridors - identified for 2022 or TBD. • Wildlife & habitat corridors - identified for Q3-4 2021. He is tying wildlife and habitat corridors to the tree canopy assessment which will be completed in late September. Mr. Lien commented on the progress of other items on the list: • Street plan update — in process • Inventory of downtown street trees — completed • Assessment of staffing and other resource needs — ongoing. Hopefully Urban Forester starting soon • Tree give-away program — tied to tree fund. Some current subdivisions applications will have fee - in -lieu Mr. Lien referred to a May 18, 2021 memo regarding Tree Code Stage 2 and options identified for Tree Retention on Private Property Not Related to Development. Goal LA of the UFMP provides: A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban forest and to consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations Mayor Pro Tem Paine interrupted, stated this is not the time for an update. She suggested they work tomorrow to identify a date for an update and a solid outreach plan to discuss this with the community. Council President Pro Tem L. Johnson clarified her request was for staff to come back with an update as given the information the Council was provided tonight, she assumed some changes had been made. She recalled a slide provided to the Council at one point stated outreach and public engagement would start Q3, it is now the middle of Q3. She was not expecting those answers tonight, but requested some thought be given to it. If staff felt they did not have clear direction, although she felt she has given direction, she was perplexed why they did not ask again because the Council has been clear this is a priority. She recalled speaking rather passionately at the beginning of the year about her frustration that the Council just keeps talking about this and not doing anything. She thought staff and the Council was on a path to doing something and now it feels like they are moving backward. She concluded she was confused and frustrated as well. Councilmember Buckshnis emphasized many cities have very good tree codes that address private property. This was one of criticisms that Council had of the Administration when the UFMP was prepared as well as the Tree Board because it glossed over the private property aspect. She thought the Council had provided clear direction and now she is baffled. Mayor Pro Tem Paine proposed concluding this discussion and she will work with staff to find a date to come back quickly with more information, an update and to get questions answered. The Council agreed. MAYOR PRO TEM PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO MOVE ITEM 9.4, COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE, TO OCTOBER 5TH Councilmember Distelhorst asked if the rules could be considered in September since their approval has been put off for over a year. Mayor Pro Tem Paine said she would try for September 28ch Councilmember K. Johnson acknowledged there were more agenda items than time allowed. She suggested delaying outdoor dining because the Council was unlikely to finish by 10 p.m. at rate they were going. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON AND MAYOR PRO TEM PAINE VOTING YES; AND Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 24, 2021 Page 20 Packet Pg. 387 9.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/21/2022 Presentation of 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements Project Update Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 18, 2021, City Council approved the Professional Services Agreement with KPG for the 76th @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements project. On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and the Committee agreed with the staff recommendation for Option 2. Staff Recommendation Approve Option 2. Narrative This project proposes intersection improvements at 761h Ave. W and 2201h St. SW, converting the existing split phasing signal operation to simultaneous protected / permissive left turns (with flashing yellow arrows) for the eastbound and westbound movements. This conversion will be possible with the addition of left turn lanes for both movements. The existing bike lanes for the southbound and eastbound movements will be extended to the intersection as part of this project, along with sidewalk widening, planter strip addition depending on the land use category of the properties, water / stormwater upgrades (with potential conversion of overhead lines to underground), and lighting upgrades. The consultant has completed the survey base map, preliminary analysis for the environmental and stormwater requirements, street lighting evaluation, and undergrounding of overhead utility requirements. A detailed evaluation of two intersection configurations has been completed to determine the best option to proceed to the final design phase (both options include all the improvements listed above): Option 1 (original grant application): addition of southbound right turn lane along 76' Ave W and maintaining two eastbound lanes approaching and departing the intersection along 2201h St. SW Option 2: reconfigure travel lanes in the eastbound approach to provide a dedicated left turn lane and a combination thru and right turn lane with one departing eastbound lane along 220th St. SW and removal of proposed southbound right turn lane along 76th Ave. As part of the evaluation, the following criteria were compared: Intersection delay / Level of Service (LOS) under current and future conditions Vehicle emissions reduction Packet Pg. 388 9.6 Active Transportation safety improvements (including pedestrian crossing distance) Right of way acquisition (impact to adjacent properties within the project limits) Total project costs Schedule Staff recommends Option 2, since it provides a very similar level of service to Option 1, improves pedestrian safety by reducing the crosswalk distance, reduces right of way acquisition impacts and has a lower project cost. If the City Council selects Option 2, then Staff will request approval from WSDOT to change the scope of work in the grant agreement from Option 1 to Option 2. This change to the project scope of work may also require approval from the Snohomish County Infrastructure Coordinating Committee and Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). The City secured a $702,000 Federal CMAQ grant for the Design phase (with 232,000 local match) and a $387,500 Federal STP grant to complete the right of way acquisition (funding available in 2023 / with $387,500 in local match). The local match will be funded by traffic impact fees. Funding from water and stormwater utilities are budgeted to complete the section of waterline replacement and stormwater upgrades / relocations. The City will pursue transportation grant opportunities in the future to fund the construction phase. Attachments: Attachment 1- 76th and 220th Project Update Presentation Packet Pg. 389 9.6.a a� a r ti 4- 0 c 0 c a� m L Q_ r_ 0 U) L CL m Q D ci 0 L. Q_ 0 N N C R t ti r a Packet Pg. 390 °QED Introduction Wiwi, • '5% Federal grants secured 1nc90 . 18 • Design $7027000 ($232,000 local match) • Right of Way $387,500 ($387,500 local match) Project description • Add dedicated eastbound and westbound left turn lanes so turning movements are concurrent, install new traffic signal system, widen sidewalk with planter strips at select locations, add ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps, up -grade City utilities, add street lighting and extend bike lanes thru intersection - for south bound/eastbound movements. Preliminary Design tasks completed so far • Survey, Determination of environmental documentation, Lighting Analysis, Stormwater Requirements, and Underground Utility Conversion Requirements Discussion items • Intersection configuration: 2 options (as identified in grant / reduced footprint) • Conversion of overhead utilities to underground `. mlw Y \ � r* t � A� - i 'k 1 a t4 fw JJJJJJ r ' J'- oil] Ho■ \TI[SITLaHtno dw'd or P71 Ey BlstriButea By 1. 8"NO-1111.2.1711floation Inc 9.6.a OPTION ELEMENTS Added Southbound RT Turn Lane Added Eastbound Dedicated Thru Lane Added Westbound LT Turn Lane 4 ft planters and 7 ft on North, South and East Legs 7 ft sidewalks wltrees in grates on West Leg Extend Dedicated Bike Lanes on North & West Legs to Intersection Longer Pedestrian Crossings Most Impact to Adjacent Property Owners Biggest ROW Acquisition Needs Longest Construction Time Line _ aD OFM a r ti #4i •`� o c 0 c a� N m L (L c 0 r r c m U) L I. a m � I D L) 0 o• m ttMw• L a 0 N Mu•»04 �-� a a "� •� -! Gam' - I - -- � 111NINNlINIIIANN - - - - LL; L_to 1 I i I C • � I� 'ili[ I. qIf Wi 7ST14 AND 220TH -OPTION 1 Q Packet Pg. 396 9.6.a a r ti *pbon 2 / 'I I grant I / I I I '/ '/ II I '93 0 0 OPTION ELEMENTS aD Added Westbound LT Turn Lane <tii m Removed 2nd Eastbound Lane on East Leg for approx. 400 ft 4 ft planters and 7 ft sidewalks on North. South and East Legs .. 7 ft planters with trees in grates on West Leg 0 Extended Dedicated N orth and West Leg Bike Lanes to intersection Added Dedicated Bike Lanes on South Leg c Requires Bus Stop Relocation on East Leg v0i Shorter Pedestrian Crossings - North. West and East legs Lower Impactto Adjacent Property Owners - Significantly Reduces Impacts to SW, MW d & NE corners - slightly higher impact to SE corner Lower ROW Acquisition Needs Q Shorter Construction Time Line 76TH AND 220TH - OPTION 2 0 L - Ii N 04 �tIN111BY1 -�• - ++ 4l11AINefu ' - � Packet Pg. 397 2022 2050 Baseline Compariso Existing Conditions - 2050 Option 1 2050 Option 2 n Conditions Same as Existing Intersection Delay/ Level of Service AM Peak: 31 sec (LOS C) AM Peak: 37 sec (LOS D) AM Peak: 20 sec (LOS C) AM Peak: 27 sec (LOS C) . (LOS) PM Peak: 44 sec (LOS D) PM Peak: 59 sec (LOS E) PM Peak: 33 sec (LOS C) PM Peak: 37 sec (LOS D) Reductions — Reductions — Vehicle Emissions - Baseline — No Reduction CO — 4,890g Daily, 1.46TAnnually CO - 4,030g Daily, 1.20TAnnually NOx - 950g daily, 0.28T Annually NOx - 785g daily, 0.23T Annually HC—1,140g Daily, 0.34TAnnually HC - 940g Daily, 0.28TAnnually Improved Surface Yes - 2 Filterra Units & Yes -1 Filterra Unit, Water Treatment/ Requires None No Detention Tank (8,000 SF No Detention Tank (1600 SF Detention new Impervious Surface) new Impervious Surface) 5' to 7' wide sidewalks, 7' wide sidewalks, 0' - 4' planter strips, 4' planter strips on North & Improved 2 non -compliant curb East legs Safety/Accessibility ramps, No change ADA compliant curb ramps & Same as Option 1 non -compliant ped signal, pedestrian signal, ex. luminaires on available new illumination system utility poles Pedestrian Crossing Distances: North Crossing Distances: North Crossing Distances: North Crossings and South legs 53' West No change leg 82', South leg 57', West leg 70', South leg 57', West leg 51' East leg 52' leg 77', East leg 72' leg 65', East leg 74' 2022 2050 Comparison Existing Baseline 2050 Option 1 2050 Option 2 s Conditions Conditions Add dedicated bike lanes to Bike Lanes None No change intersection on West, North Same as Option 1 and South approaches 3 large trees NE corner, 3 3 large trees on NE corner, 3 Tree Removal - None medium trees North leg - west side, 3 smaller trees smaller trees on West leg - West leg - south side south side 3 small trees in planter on south 4' landscaped planters w/ street trees on North, East & 4' landscaped planters w/ side of West Leg, large amount South legs, street trees in street trees on North, East & Landscaping & of private landscaping on NW No change grates on West leg, heavy South legs, street trees in Trees corner, medium amount of impacts to private grates on West leg, much landscaping on NE & SE landscaping on NW & NE lower impacts to landscaping corners corners and on West leg on private property Impacts to NW, NE & SW Less Impacts to NW, NE & SW Right of Way _ None corners, relocate private corners, relocate private Acquisition driveway on SW corner for driveway on SW corner for intersection requirements intersection requirements Community _ None None Bus Stop Relocation on East Transit Impacts Leg Project Cost $8.1 M $6.2M Conversion of Overhead Utilities to Underground Inc. (possible improvements in grant application) Removal of 8 utility poles (excluding poles holding high tension lines along 220th St. SW that will remain) • 1 on west leg • 1 pole on SE and SW corners • 4 poles on north leg • 2 poles on east leg TOTAL COST of this addition: $1.8 Million (same cost for both options) Conclusion Staff recommends Option 2 over Option 1: o Total project cost is less ($1.9M less) o Similar improvement to level of service o Pedestrian crosswalk distance is less o Right of way acquisition cost and property impacts are less o Reduced area for new impervious surfaces 9.6.a a� a r ti 4- 0 c 0 c a� m L Q_ r_ 0 U) L CL m Q D ci 0 L. Q_ 0 N N C R t ti r a Packet Pg. 402