The URL can be used to link to this page

2022-07-19 City Council - Full Agenda-3228Op E D o Agenda Edmonds City Council tnl. }nyo REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 JULY 19, 2022, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. 6. RECEIVED FOR FILING Edmonds City Council Agenda July 19, 2022 Page 1 1. Claim for Damages from Stephen Schroeder (0 min) 2. May 2022 Monthly Financial Report (0 min) 3. Written Public Comments (0 min) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 5, 2022 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 5, 2022 3. Approval of Council Committee Minutes 4. Approval of claim checks. 5. Administrative Services Job Descriptions 6. Update to Personnel Policy 3.10 Job Assignments 7. Police Cadet Position 8. Parking Enforcement Position 9. Oktoberfest Special Event Agreement 8. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing BD2 Designated Street Front Interim Ordinance No. 4262 (30 min) 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Community Services/Economic Development Director- Appointment Confirmation and Employment Agreement (10 min) 2. Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study (30 min) 3. Position Conversion to 1.0 FTE for DV Coordinator Position (10 min) 4. Public Disclosure Specialist Position Request (10 min) 5. New Public Records Associate Position (10 min) 6. Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) Training (Part 2) (45 min) 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda July 19, 2022 Page 2 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Claim for Damages from Stephen Schroeder Staff Lead: NA Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Stephen Schroeder Narrative Stephen Schroeder 1142 Vista Place ($557.19) Attachments: Claim for Damages - Schroeder, Stephen - for council Packet Pg. 3 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that Stephen Schroeder and Cheryl Beighle , who currently resides at mailing address same home phone # , work phone # and who resided at at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is , is claiming damages against Water Utility in the sum of $ 557.19 arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: March 11, 2022 LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: Water Utility Office DESCRIPTION: TIME: �7 E I U 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. Starting in August of 2021, our water bill increased by a factor of three over prior years. Since we had had one of our adult children, her husband, and two children living in our house from August of 2018 to August of 2021, it made no sense that our bill would go up so much at a time when the usage had obviously gone down. Concerned, I began calling the City of Edmonds Water Department with my concerns. When, after many unsuccessful attempts, I was able to talk to someone, the person with whom I -spoke was dismissive. She informed me that our water meter had been replaced in August of 2021 and that we obviously had a leak between the meter and our house. I pointed out that, since our metered usage had gone up drastically starting in August, it seemed likely that the meter was faulty. (Continued) (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes X No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: _ and the policy #: License Plate # Type Auto: _ * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * Driver License # (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 4 6.1.a This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted Io practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. r � �. IA r Signature of Claimant' Or 7/�Y � ZG 7-7L Date and place (residential address, city and county) Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 511, Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m.-to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2 a� E CU L E U Packet Pg. 5 s.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 May 2022 Monthly Financial Report Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Sarah Mager Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Received for Filing Narrative May 2022 Monthly Financial Report Attachments: May 2022 Monthly Financial Report Finance Committee Mtg 07_12 Packet Pg. 6 I 6.2.a I OF -`j7c 1$9\3 CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT MAY 2022 Packet Pg. 7 1 I 6.2.a I INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail As of May 31, 2022 Years Agency/ Investment Purchase to Par Market Maturity Coupon Issuer Type Price Maturity Value Value Date Rate FFCB Bonds 1,998,548 0.04 2,000,000 2,000,656 06/14/22 1.88% Energy Northwest Bonds 1,466,077 0.08 1,345,000 1,349,304 07/01/22 5.00% Energy Northwest Bonds 260,748 0.08 250,000 250,325 07/01/22 2.95% Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA Bonds 948,084 0.50 855,000 870,296 12/01/22 5.00% Grant Cnty WA Bonds 1,517,955 0.59 1,500,000 1,495,830 01/01/23 1.54% Grant Cnty WA Bonds 576,332 0.59 520,000 530,759 01/01/23 5.00% Seattle WA Muni Bonds 2,224,500 0.67 2,000,000 2,047,180 02/01/23 5.00% FHLMC Bonds 988,678 0.89 1,000,000 985,858 04/20/23 0.38% FHLB Bonds 1,996,590 1.35 2,000,000 1,953,936 10/05/23 0.22% First Financial - ECA CD 2,803,516 1.46 2,803,516 2,803,516 11/15/23 2.08% Kent WA Bonds 286,648 1.50 250,000 261,880 12/01/23 5.00% FNMA Bonds 992,693 2.09 1,000,000 985,461 07/02/24 1.75% Spokane County WA Bonds 207,260 2.51 200,000 196,890 12/01/24 2.10% First Financial - Waterfront Center CD 1,575,000 5.42 1,575,000 1,575,000 11/01/27 0.20% TOTAL SECURITIES 17,842,627 1.27 17,298,516 17,306,891 Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool 16,906,969 16,906,969 Demand 0.71% Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool 42,731,425 42,731,425 Demand 1.16% TOTAL PORTFOLIO $ 76,936,911 $ 76,945,285 KSeattleent WAIssuer Diversification 1% A Mason & 12% First KitsapCnty Financial - WA, 5% CD, 25% Spokane Grant Cnty am County WA, 12% FHLB, 12% WA, 1% FFCB, 12% Energy Northwest, NMA, 6FHLMC, 6% 9% F% Cash and Investment Balances Checking, (in $ Millions) —$4.2 , 5% Bonds, CD's, $4.4, $12.9, 5% 16% State LGIP, $16.9, 21% County LGIP, $42.7, 53% 1 Packet Pg. 8 1 6.2.a INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Annual Interest Income $1,400, 000 $1,236,875 $1,200, 000 $1,000,000 $947,931 $950,684 $882556 $800,000 $635,781 $600,000 $400,000 $367,590 $200,000 $- 2017 2018 2019 2021 YTD 2022 O d c R c ii 21 z c O 2 N N O N R O C. O C C IL 21 z r C O a N N O N fC C N E t C� r r Q 2 Packet Pg. 9 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY I 6.2.a I General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months) General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenses 10,000, 000 9,000, 000 8,000, 000 7,000,000 + 6,000,000 ♦ ♦ • 5,000,000 4,000, 000 3,000, 000 . 2,000, 000 1,000, 000 June September December March 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000, 000 6,000, 000 4,000,000 2,000, 000 June September December March General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 through 2021) Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes ——---—---- - - — - —- - -- - - -- —— _ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 General Fund Tax Revenue (2022 YTD) 6,500,000 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,000,000 4 4 34 4,500,000 4,00,000 — ,500,000 $3,562,825 3,000,000 2 265 940 2,500,000 2,000, 000 1,500,000 1,000, 000 500,000 Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes r 0 a� c c� c ii 0 M N N O N ca 0 0. m .v c c ii 21 t c 0 2 N N O N c a� E t v M r Q 3 I Packet Pg. 10 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2022 General Fund Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 2,486,429 $ 2,486,429 $ 2,291,020 -7.86% February 4,917,170 2,430,740 4,711,093 -4.19% March 7,380,020 2,462,851 7,394,990 0.20% April 10,516,012 3,135,992 10,451,247 -0.62% May 19,357,334 8,841,322 19,394,416 0.19% June 21,935,611 2,578,276 July 24,465,539 2,529,929 August 27,084,819 2,619,280 September 29,465,113 2,380,294 October 33,512,944 4,047,830 November 42,090,496 8,577,552 December 44,640,708 2,550,212 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2022 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 381,097 $ 381,097 $ 377,895 -0.84% February 611,562 230,465 620,392 1.44% March 952,142 340,580 793,926 -16.62% April 1,227,434 275,291 1,165,930 -5.01% May 1,586,772 359,339 1,544,140 -2.69% June 1,961,879 375,106 July 2,368,248 406,370 August 2,810,074 441,826 September 3,256,638 446,564 October 3,660,486 403,848 November 4,056,561 396,075 December 4,400,000 343,439 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 4 Packet Pg. 11 1 SALES TAX SUMMARY I 6.2.a I Construction Trade, $697,508 Accommodation, $15,095 Clothing and Accessories, $141,889 Communications, $104,216� Wholesale Trade, $150,497 Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: May 2022 Year -to -Date Total $4,483,349 Automotive Repair, Amusement & $95,347 Recreation, $29,916 Health & Personal Business Services, Care, $119,935 , VSm AAA C',aanline, $13,014 Food Stores, S144,383 Others, $73,350 Eating & Drinking, Manufacturing, $52,254 $458,502 Annual Sales Tax Revenue 12,000, 000 $10,302,518 10,000, 000 $7,395,114 $8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046 8,000,000 6,905,122 6,000,000 j4,48q3,349 4,000,000 2,000,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 YTD 2022 5 Packet Pg. 12 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2022 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 763,651 $ 763,651 $ 857,872 12.34% February 1,704,609 940,958 1,853,000 8.71% March 2,420,254 715,646 2,666,259 10.16% April 3,074,639 654,384 3,469,412 12.84% May 3,893,081 818,442 4,483,349 15.16% June 4,672,507 779,426 July 5,523,403 850,896 August 6,439,084 915,680 September 7,293,649 854,565 October 8,203,996 910,347 November 9,139,425 935,429 December 10,000,000 860,575 Sales and Use Tax 11,000,000 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Yeaz Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2022 Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 79,399 $ 79,399 $ 96,596 21.66% February 164,205 84,806 96,596 -41.17% March 246,125 81,920 305,138 23.98% April 313,860 67,734 397,808 26.75% May 367,416 53,556 469,966 27.91% June 402,173 34,757 July 429,975 27,802 August 452,332 22,357 September 472,668 20,335 October 496,035 23,367 November 534,998 38,963 December 595,000 60,002 Gas Utility Tax 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O C. N C R C LL t y+ C O 2 tV tV O tV R O C. O c C LL 21 z r C O 2 N N O tV fC C N E t t� r r Q 6 Packet Pg. 13 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2022 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 53,352 $ 53,352 $ 43,844 -17.82% February 96,981 43,629 66,255 -31.68% March 143,255 46,275 130,244 -9.08% April 192,397 49,142 175,045 -9.02% May 232,481 40,084 208,020 -10.52% June 277,770 45,288 July 321,046 43,277 August 362,710 41,663 September 400,099 37,389 October 445,363 45,264 November 482,039 36,676 December 523,000 40,961 Telephone Utility Tax 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2022 Dectric Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 148,905 $ 148,905 $ 183,023 22.91% February 312,488 163,583 377,116 20.68% March 449,608 137,121 534,798 18.95% April 602,286 152,678 726,969 20.70% May 723,393 121,107 858,720 18.71% June 824,492 101,099 July 920,639 96,147 August 1,015,921 95,282 September 1,108,535 92,614 October 1,199,070 90,535 November 1,299,972 100,902 December 1,410,000 110,028 Electric Utility Tax 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*--CurrentYear Budget �Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 7 Packet Pg. 14 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2022 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 809,979 $ 809,979 $ 827,704 2.19% February 1,383,405 573,426 1,383,308 -0.01% March 2,213,219 829,814 2,127,271 -3.88% April 2,744,029 530,810 2,688,719 -2.02% May 3,542,697 798,668 3,507,398 -1.00% June 4,167,857 625,160 July 5,138,308 970,451 August 5,986,736 848,427 September 7,133,311 1,146,575 October 7,954,825 821,514 November 8,891,706 936,881 December 9,464,783 573,077 Storm Water Sales Meter Water Sales 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 " 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 i 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Yeaz Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2022 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 426,464 $ 426,464 $ 417,730 -2.05% February 1,352,938 926,475 1,322,856 -2.22% March 1,779,789 426,851 1,740,623 -2.20% April 2,159,443 379,654 2,114,167 -2.10% May 2,586,880 427,437 2,531,673 -2.13% June 2,966,444 379,564 July 3,385,868 419,425 August 4,311,526 925,657 September 4,738,766 427,240 October 5,118,192 379,426 November 5,545,860 427,668 December 5,911,497 365,637 Storm Water Sales 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,000,000 500,000 ,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 500,000 000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0--CurrentYear Budget -0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. g Packet Pg. 15 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2022 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 863,521 $ 863,521 $ 877,046 1.57% February 1,571,494 707,973 1,604,010 2.07% March 2,435,565 864,071 2,451,231 0.64% April 3,143,499 707,934 3,183,083 1.26% May 4,009,811 866,312 4,066,458 1.41% June 4,719,932 710,121 July 5,593,564 873,631 August 6,307,925 714,362 September 7,215,145 907,220 October 7,936,868 721,723 November 8,819,637 882,769 December 9,528,089 708,452 Unmeter Sewer Sales 1 V,V VV,VVV 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC —0—CurrentYear Budget PriorYew *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 9 Packet Pg. 16 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2022 General FWnd Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 5,342,528 $ 5,342,528 $ 4,601,625-13.87% February 9,225,120 3,882,592 8,134,057-11.83% March 13,453,045 4,227,925 11,966,023-11.05% April 17,154,891 3,701,846 15,469,533 -9.82% May 21,081,164 3,926,273 19,144,538 -9.19% June 25,953,408 4,872,244 July 30,083,274 4,129,866 August 33,991,194 3,907,920 September 38,121,718 4,130,524 October 42,646,764 4,525,046 November 47,397,312 4,750,547 December 52,360,872 4,963,560 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2022 Non -Departmental Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 2,508,279 $ 2,508,279 $ 2,099,939 -16.28% February 3,543,187 1,034,908 2,938,380 -17.07% March 4,861,868 1,318,681 4,088,791 -15.90% April 5,666,194 804,326 5,036,007 -11.12% May 6,662,820 996,625 6,003,725 -9.89% June 8,507,675 1,844,856 July 9,572,392 1,064,717 August 10,448,509 876,116 September 11,463,698 1,015,189 October 12,742,850 1,279,152 November 14,166,478 1,423,628 December 15,574,121 1,407,643 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 10 Packet Pg. 17 1 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2022 City council Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 33,985 $ 33,985 $ 23,687 -30.30% February 71,308 37,323 43,670 -38.76% March 112,128 40,821 71,408 -36.32% April 150,174 38,046 100,819 -32.87% May 199,408 49,234 129,439 -35.09% June 253,207 53,799 July 291,886 38,679 August 345,215 53,328 September 382,380 37,165 October 414,981 32,601 November 455,321 40,340 December 497,900 42,579 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2022 Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Act uals January $ 36,522 $ 36,522 $ 28,255 -22.63% February 74,639 38,117 59,226 -20.65% March 111,240 36,600 89,568 -19.48% April 148,486 37,247 119,372 -19.61% May 185,158 36,671 148,671 -19.71% June 221,111 35,953 July 257,901 36,789 August 295,030 37,129 September 331,738 36,709 October 367,805 36,067 November 405,747 37,941 December 443,913 38,166 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 11 Packet Pg. 18 1 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2022 Human Resources Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 77,402 $ 77,402 $ 59,932 -22.57% February 141,639 64,236 135,524 -4.32% March 202,815 61,176 203,581 0.38% April 266,756 63,941 270,474 1.39% May 331,195 64,439 334,902 1.12% June 405,872 74,678 July 464,145 58,273 August 524,126 59,981 September 590,408 66,282 October 654,662 64,254 November 726,800 72,138 December 824,831 98,031 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2022 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 104,268 $ 104,268 $ 91,643 -12.11% February 213,906 109,638 187,919 -12.15% March 322,490 108,584 284,025 -11.93% April 431,592 109,102 386,046 -10.55% May 548,505 116,913 482,322 -12.07% June 6S4,S84 106,079 July 763,667 109,084 August 884,110 120,443 September 995,910 111,800 October 1,110,987 115,077 November 1,227,059 116,072 December 1,368,755 141,696 Municipal Court 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY RUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget - -Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O 0. N M C R C_ LL t y+ C O 2 N N O tV R O C. O O C M C LL 21 t r C O 2 N N O tV M C N E t U M r Q 12 Packet Pg. 19 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2022 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs January $ 49,857 $ 49,857 $ 33,127 -33.56% February 103,113 53,256 72,230 -29.95% March 155,568 52,455 122,479 -21.27% April 205,451 49,882 179,118 -12.82% May 260,752 55,301 216,588 -16.94% June 315,986 55,234 July 373,132 57,147 August 434,777 61,645 September 492,000 57,223 October 552,240 60,239 November 622,590 70,351 December 719,388 96,798 Community Services/Economic Development 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*--Current Year Budget -d-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O N C R C LL t y+ C O 2 N N O N R O C. O C C IL z r C O 2 N N O N fC C N E t U M r r Q 13 Packet Pg. 20 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund 2022 Technology Rental Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 176,962 $ 176,962 $ 216,858 22.55% February 334,966 158,004 287,295 -14.23% March 484,397 149,431 502,978 3.84% April 566,805 82,408 545,022 -3.84% May 674,037 107,232 603,046 -10.53% June 784,541 110,504 July 877,847 93,306 August 989,174 111,327 September 1,106,217 117,044 October 1,245,373 139,155 November 1,341,722 96,350 December 1,539,022 197,300 Administrative Services Technology Rental Fund 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 11000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-Current Year Budget --d-PriorYear City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services 2022 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 238,721 $ 238,721 $ 217,022 -9.09% February 399,953 161,232 380,532 -4.86% March 563,330 163,378 547,460 -2.82% April 729,233 165,903 722,690 -0.90% May 896,198 166,965 901,287 0.57% June 1,121,628 225,430 July 1,314,351 192,723 August 1,478,599 164,248 September 1,647,511 168,911 October 1,824,204 176,693 November 1,989,608 165,404 December 2,156,911 167,303 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O N M C R C LL t y+ C O 2 N N O tV R O C. O M C M C LL 21 t r C O 2 N N O tV M C N E t U M r Q 14 Packet Pg. 21 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2022 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 80,982 $ 80,982 $ 77,656 -4.11% February 161,963 80,982 155,234 -4.16% March 242,945 80,982 233,065 -4.07% April 323,927 80,982 287,018 -11.39% May 404,908 80,982 388,315 -4.10% June 485,890 80,982 July 566,871 80,982 August 647,853 80,982 September 728,835 80,982 October 809,816 80,982 November 890,798 80,982 December 971,780 80,982 Police City Attorney 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --*--Current Year Budget --Ip--PriorYear City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 1,045,238 $ 1,045,238 $ 973,358 -6.88% February 2,105,968 1,060,730 1,945,020 -7.64% March 3,177,596 1,071,629 3,008,075 -5.33% April 4,236,492 1,058,896 4,001,453 -5.55% May 5,296,298 1,059,805 5,133,192 -3.08% June 6,428,932 1,132,634 July 7,551,012 1,122,080 August 8,579,704 1,028,692 September 9,657,485 1,077,782 October 10,845,669 1,188,184 November 12,168,634 1,322,964 December 13,375,470 1,206,836 Ponce 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC � Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O IZ Gl 2 C R C LL t y+ C O 2 N N O N R O C. O C C LL t r.+ C O 2 N N O N C N 1= t C� r r Q 15 Packet Pg. 22 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services 2022 Development Services Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 272,173 $ 272,173 $ 309,139 13.58% February 567,186 295,012 661,303 16.59% March 860,247 293,062 909,669 5.75% April 1,174,618 314,370 1,157,411 -1.46% May 1,488,050 313,432 1,419,912 -4.58% June 1,792,716 304,666 July 2,114,310 321,593 August 2,423,605 309,295 September 2,733,462 309,857 October 3,039,102 305,640 November 3,402,002 362,901 December 3,791,859 389,857 Parks & Recreation Development Services 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-Current Year Budget --d-PriorYear City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 358,065 $ 358,065 $ 319,222 -10.85% February 748,023 389,958 651,988 -12.84% March 1,136,243 388,220 1,040,803 -8.40% April 1,535,144 398,902 1,354,932 -11.74% May 1,941,016 405,872 1,709,327 -11.94% June 2,369,808 428,792 July 2,835,053 465,245 August 3,347,305 512,252 September 3,871,489 524,184 October 4,291,784 420,295 November 4,690,353 398,569 December 5,125,535 435,182 Parks & Recreation 5,500,000 5,000,000 500,000 000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 500,000 000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*--Current Year Budget -d--PriorYear *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O N C R C LL t y+ C O 2 tV tV O tV R O C. O c C LL t C O 2 N N O tV C N 1= t t� r r Q 16 Packet Pg. 23 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration 2022 Public Works Administration Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 49,466 $ 49,466 $ 22,716 -54.08% February 100,066 50,600 46,637 -53.39% March 150,167 50,100 71,242 -52.56% April 201,867 51,701 94,556 -53.16% May 252,421 50,554 117,239 -53.55% June 303,852 51,431 July 355,684 51,832 August 405,471 49,786 September 455,172 49,701 October 504,185 49,013 November 567,424 63,239 December 614,113 46,689 Facilities Maintenance Public Works Administration 700,000 600,000 500,000 00,000 300,000 00,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2022 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 219,301 $ 219,301 $ 109,202 -50.20% February 456,337 237,035 369,398 -19.05% March 723,326 266,990 562,089 -22.29% April 964,010 240,684 782,173 -18.86% May 1,206,775 242,765 942,003 -21.94% June 1,404,870 198,095 July 1,647,775 242,905 August 1,934,891 287,116 September 2,271,751 336,861 October 2,655,928 384,177 November 2,962,277 306,349 December 3,425,275 462,998 Facilities Maintenance 3,500,000 3,000,000 500,000 000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*--Current Year Budget -d--PriorYear *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 17 Packet Pg. 24 I 6.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2022 Engineering Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 225,595 $ 225,595 $ 226,829 0.55% February 452,988 227,392 457,182 0.93% March 684,071 231,083 685,977 0.28% April 917,956 233,885 914,235 -0.41% May 1,175,026 257,070 1,140,813 -2.91% June 1,412,521 237,495 July 1,660,688 248,167 August 1,900,016 239,329 September 2,131,816 231,799 October 2,366,570 234,755 November 2,602,612 236,042 December 2,845,336 242,724 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O N M C M C_ M t y+ C O N N O N M O Q. O C M C M z r C O 2 N N O N M C N E t C� M r r Q 18 Packet Pg. 25 1 I 6.2.a I CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 44,640,708 $ 20,122,774 $ 19,394,416 $ 25,246,292 430/ 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 225,000 - - 225,000 00/ 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 119,645 - 14,021 105,624 120/ 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND Ill STREET FUND 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 1 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 136 PARKS TRUSTFUND 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 143 TREE FUND 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 3 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 4 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 4 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND - 100 - - 00/ 200,000 - - 200,000 00/ 167,210 1,235 729 166,481 00/ 1,751,930 568,982 549,412 1,202,518 31°/ .-. 13,684,871 879,839 1,244,306 12,440,565 90/ p sZ 216,701 13,726 84,277 132,424 390/ - 336 - - 00/ 84,410 20,025 35,174 49,236 420/ 26,540 10,112 11,669 14,871 R 443 C 1,550 230 139 1,411 90/ T 29,590 7,667 12,422 17,168 420/ 24. C 2,271,020 1,021,895 811,619 1,459,401 360/ 0 2,261,030 1,015,701 805,698 1,455,332 360/ N N 82,750 38,854 74,921 7,829 910/ N 182,430 89,889 84,910 97,520 47°/ 4,330 2,768 1,632 2,698 380/ 2 43,520 27,774 19,896 23,624 460/ C 10,290 172 150 10,140 10/ 79,349 53,100 54,618 24,731 690/ 65,000 32,633 24,287 40,713 37°1 .� C 4,856,549 - - 4,856,549 00/ 215,330 - 198 215,132 00/ LL 21 611,370 26,546 30,871 580,499 501 t 3,822,685 297,266 810,944 3,011,741 r 21°/ C - 5,070 70,785 (70,785) 00/ N 11,018,136 3,977,023 4,103,567 6,914,569 370/ Np N 7,877,897 3,138,690 2,871,175 5,006,722 36°/ 24,820,083 10,964,836 7,948,007 16,872,076 323 1,988,700 4 1,115 1,987,585 00/ d 1,925,920 662,901 761,804 1,164,116 400/ E 1,153,570 511,560 483,440 670,130 s 420/ U $ 124,438,114 $ 43,491,708 $ 40,306,202 $ 84,131,912 r 320/ Q 1 Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Traffic Impact fee in March 2022. 2 REET revenues are down a total of $(405,510) from this point in time last year. Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Park Impact fee in March 2022. 4 2022 Utility Rate Increases are 4.5%for Water, 5%for Sewer, and 9.5%for Storm Drain. 19 Packet Pg. 26 I 6.2.a I C TIY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERAL FUND $ 52,360,872 $ 17,443,966 $ 19,144,538 $ 33,216,334 370/ 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 260,490 143,272 126,014 134,476 480/ 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,900 - - 5,900 00/ 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 545,000 - 17,074 527,926 30/ 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND - 16,149 - - 00/ 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 200,000 - - 200,000 00/ 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 45,800 - - 45,800 00/ III STREET FUND 2,315,780 944,110 934,609 1,381,171 400/ C 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 12,868,796 718,973 605,359 12,263,437 0. 501 a) 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 195,380 13,098 16,940 178,440 9°/ 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 100,900 16,876 19,714 81,186 200/ 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 - - 26,880 00/ _ 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 - - 3,000 00/ - 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 28,200 - 533 27,667 20/ C 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 4,589,688 118,066 643,105 3,946,583 140/ 0 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2,483,667 335,001 134,700 2,348,967 501 N N 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 78,400 10,981 4,334 74,066 60/ N 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 220,561 99,844 78,494 142,067 360/ 136 PARKSTRUST FUND 50,000 - 2,540 47,460 50/ 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 25,000 - - 25,000 00/ C 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 11,900 - 70 11,830 10/ d 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 87,680 20,149 20,878 66,802 240/ O 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 6,077,492 - 380,776 5,696,716 60/ .� C 143 TREE FUND 214,800 - - 214,800 00/ _ 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 611,370 - - 611,370 00/ LL 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 7,614,418 173,967 2,323,141 5,291,277 310/ s r 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 11,490,988 2,269,017 2,358,873 9,132,115 210/ 0 O 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 9,619,649 1,779,846 1,741,370 7,878,279 180/ N 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,529,856 8,783,826 6,399,786 23,130,070 220/ p N 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 - - 1,988,710 00/ >, 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,950,371 400,759 514,481 1,435,890 260/ 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,539,022 460,963 603,046 935,976 390/ C N 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND - 34,879 - - 0°/ E t $ 147,140,570 $ 33,783,742 $ 36,070,376 $ 111,070,194 250/ r r Q 20 Packet Pg. 27 I 6.2.a I C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Re ccived TAXES: 1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 2 EMSPROPERTY TAX 3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX 4 LOCAL RETAIL SALES✓USE TAX 5 5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 8 GASUTILITY TAX 9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 10 WATERUTILITY TAX 11 SEWER UTILITY TAX 12 STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 15 PULLTABSTAX 16 AMUSEMENT GAMES 17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LICENSES AND PERMITS: 18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE 19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-COMCAST 22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT 23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER 24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 28 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 29 ANIMAL LICENSES 30 STREET AND CURB PERMIT 31 OTR NON -BUS LIC/PERMIT S INTERGOVERNMENTAL: 32 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 33 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 34 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2 35 WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT 36 WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION 37 DOC FAC ROOFING 38 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY 39 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 40 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT 41 CJ - POPULATION 42 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS 43 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION 44 DUI - CITIES 45 FIRE INS PREMIUM TAX 46 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 47 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 48 INTERLOCAL GRANTS 49 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND 50 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ. 51 VERDANT INT ERLOCAL GRANTS $ 11,127,000 $ 5,675,538 $ 5,687,070 $ 5,439,930 510/ 4,278,000 2,236,816 2,265,940 2,012,060 530/ 500 1 27 473 501 10,000,000 3,922,140 4,483,349 5,516,651 450i 7,600 5,022 7,539 61 990i 870,000 370,858 415,496 454,504 480i 1,410,000 872,875 858,720 551,280 610i 595,000 413,190 469,966 125,034 790i 284,000 140,370 143,254 140,746 500/ 953,000 352,743 350,681 602,319 370/ 894,600 380,108 321,835 572,765 360i 471,900 230,815 253,170 218,730 540/ O 792,000 331,723 342,948 449,052 430i 523,000 218,932 208,020 314,980 400i 55,200 38,156 38,435 16,765 700i 350 143 - 350 0°i 'v 306,000 77,762 152,734 153,266 500/ 32,568,150 15,267,190 15,999,183 16,568,967 497i C I.L 250 350 100 150 400i >+ 700 - 20 680 30i 40,000 13,412 29,774 10,226 740i C 702,700 338,231 349,602 353,098 500/ M 41,000 12,806 15,062 25,938 370i cV 100,600 32,964 24,677 75,923 250/ c 384,000 82,609 199,970 184,030 520i N 250,000 100,542 102,163 147,837 41°i 63,000 35,610 41,935 21,065 670i 2 30,000 14,440 30,173 (173) 1010i v 650,600 272,543 348,456 302,144 540i C 24,000 7,821 9,386 14,614 390i Q. 55,000 29,601 39,405 15,595 720i 20,000 6,757 6,450 13,550 32°/ 2,361,850 947,684 1,197,173 1,164,677 510i v C 9,000 6,464 5,237 3,763 580i C 11,100 916 718 10,382 60/ E - 3,947 - - 00/ >+ 3,448 307 (307) 00i M - 2,000 (2,000) 00/ C - 379,270 - - 00/ z 273,000 - 273,000 00i N 210,500 - - 210,500 0°/ c 16,740 8,070 10,776 5,964 640i cN 13,070 6,757 7,142 5,928 550/ 45,600 24,120 25,386 20,214 560i 2 60,000 17,895 24,665 35,335 410i 4,500 3,335 3,587 914 800i - 42,983 56,744 (56,744) 00i E 261,500 146,188 152,556 108,944 580i v 343,200 83,909 83,190 260,010 240/ r - 27,216 - - 00i Q 1,000 - 1,000 00/ 550 - 550 00/ - 66,000 - - 00/ 1,249,760 820,517 372,308 877,452 300/ 5 2022 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $561,209 higher than 2021 revenues. Please also see pages pages 5 & 6. 21 Packet Pg. 28 I 6.2.a I C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: 1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES 3 CREDIT CARD FEES 4 COURT RECORD SERVICES 5 D/M COURT REC SER 6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE 7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE 8 IT TIME PAY FEE 9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURREXPEN 10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS 11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 13 PHOTOCOPIES 14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES 17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES (SNO-ISLE) 18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 24 LEGAL SERVICES 25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 26 BOOKING FEES 27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 33 PLAN CHECKING FEES 34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 35 PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW 37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY 38 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 39 PROGRAM FEES 40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 41 HOLIDAY MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 42 UPTOWN EVENING MARKET FEES 43 WINTERMARKET FEES 44 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 45 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS $ 3,000 $ 2,736 $ 2,212 $ 789 740/ 600 43 72 528 120/ 11,000 2,405 441 10,559 40/ 150 - 1 149 10/ 300 - - 300 00/ - 168 - 00/ 4,000 98 4,000 00/ 1,000 293 49 951 501 50 70 72 (22) 1440/ 100 - 100 00/ 25,000 - 25,000 00/ 600 - 600 00/ 1,000 173 51 949 501 5,000 - - 5,000 00/ 180,000 109,098 102,328 77,672 570/ 1,400 - 2,885 (1,485) 2060/ 85,000 34,942 46,468 38,532 550/ 10,000 - 2,275 7,725 230/ 30,000 - - 30,000 00/ 14,000 - 251 13,749 20/ 210,970 102,412 52,742 158,228 250/ - - 25 (25) 00/ 57,000 33,108 35,250 21,750 620/ 1,050 132 302 748 290/ 38,000 13,786 7,852 30,148 210/ 3,000 408 216 2,784 70/ 10,000 11,672 11,851 (1,851) 1190/ 3,500 1,180 220 3,280 60/ 1,007,500 465,101 238,403 769,097 240/ 2,500 1,382 1,943 557 780/ 100 - - 100 00/ 65,600 43,648 47,673 17,928 730/ 425,000 235,979 129,976 295,024 310/ 4,000 7,125 7,036 (3,036) 1760/ 500 - 110 390 220/ 3,000 1,480 3,700 (700) 1230/ 14,000 6,655 8,010 5,990 570/ 13,000 - 1,015 11,985 80/ 1,011,580 197,480 333,500 678,080 330/ 1,300 - - 1,300 00/ 5,000 880 - 5,000 00/ - - 740 (740) 00/ - 7,310 (7,310) 00/ 1,000 - - 1,000 00/ 4,011,558 1,411,560 491,040 3,520,518 120/ 7,261,358 2,684,014 1,536,019 5,725,339 21°/ t O N 2 C R C U_ s C O 2 N N 0 N A O t O O. d U C C IL z r C O z N N O N T M w C N sr t c� O r r Q 22 Packet Pg. 29 I 6.2.a I Title FINES AND PENALTIES: 1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 6 OTHERINFRACTIONS'04 7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 8 PARK/INDDISZONE 9 DWI PENALTIES 10 DUI - DP ACCT 11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI 12 DUI - DP FEE 13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 15 CRIM CONV FEE CT 16 OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 20 CRIM CONV FEE CN 21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT 24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES MISCELLANEOUS : 26 INVESTMENT INTEREST 27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 29 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS 30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 31 LEASES LONG-TERM 32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION 33 PARKS DONATIONS 34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 39 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT 40 POLICE JUDGMENT SIREST ITUT ION 41 CASHIERS OVERAGESSHORTAGES 42 OTHERMISC REVENUES 43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT 44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 45 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 46 NSF FEES -POLICE 47 NSF FEES -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 48 US BANK REBAT E TRANSFERS -IN: 49 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 TO TAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE C ITY O F EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received $ 2,000 $ 1,231 $ 673 $ 1,327 340/ 230,000 85,310 24,863 205,137 110/ 18,000 4,142 1,933 16,067 110/ 10,000 6,649 1,535 8,465 150/ 1,000 203 - 1,000 00/ 1,500 840 265 1,235 180/ 100,000 25,877 6,270 93,730 60/ 2,000 250 114 1,886 60/ 7,000 3,402 1,159 5,841 170/ 300 16 27 273 90/ 100 59 14 86 140/ 1,500 749 596 904 400/ 25,000 6,030 3,792 21,208 150/ 2,000 693 613 1,387 310/ 700 51 37 663 501 100 12 - 100 00/ 10,000 574 1,187 8,813 120/ 800 115 12 788 20/ 1,000 70 171 829 170/ 200 46 - 200 00/ 8,000 1,883 1,671 6,329 210/ 14,000 3,890 1,217 12,783 90/ 3,000 946 74 2,926 20/ 10,100 - 50 10,050 00/ 150 187 - 150 00/ 448,450 143,223 46,271 4029179 10°/ 270,390 139,409 98,440 171,950 360/ 13,340 3,600 2,920 10,420 220/ 10,180 2,792 2,369 7,811 230/ 153,000 17,079 44,333 108,667 290/ 2,100 - - 2,100 00/ 205,000 80,527 85,929 119,071 420/ 2,500 - 239 2,261 100/ 3,500 - 2,300 1,200 660/ 1,500 350 370 1,130 250/ 5,000 3,503 249 4,751 50/ 300 - 76 224 250/ 3,800 3,340 1,288 2,512 340/ 2,000 - - 2,000 00/ 2,000 102 - 2,000 00/ 200 40 30 170 150/ - 19 100 (100) 00/ 41,180 4,322 808 40,372 20/ 100 38 26 74 260/ 100 30 30 70 300/ 150 - - 150 00/ - 30 - - 00/ - - 60 (60) 00/ 8,500 4,966 3,896 4,604 460/ 724,840 260,146 243,462 481,378 340/ 26,300 - 26,300 00/ 26,300 - - 26,300 00/ $ 44,640,708 $ 20,122,774 $ 19,394,416 $ 25,246,292 430/ t O N lY C R C LL s C O 2 N N O N A O t O O- C O C iL z C O 2 N N O N cc w C d s c� O r r Q 23 Packet Pg. 30 1 I 6.2.a I C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining % Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 19,196,413 $ 7,049,798 $ 7,171,108 $ 12,025,305 37° 2 OVERTIME 594,080 237,408 462,889 131,191 789 3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK 294,001 1,951 8,212 285,789 39 4 BENEFITS 6,820,049 2,662,252 2,681,368 4,138,681 39° 5 UNIFORMS 119,151 30,246 31,471 87,680 26° 6 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 70,944 - 34,118 36,826 480/ 7 SUPPLIES 481,165 172,484 168,405 312,760 35° 8 FUEL CONSUMED - 17 - - 0°. 9 SMALL EQUIPMENT 204,019 70,647 49,557 154,462 249 10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,411,043 5,389,065 6,191,658 11,219,385 36° 11 COMMUNICATIONS 171,235 55,740 57,465 113,770 340, 12 TRAVEL 81,155 6,081 18,300 62,855 239 13 EXCISE TAXES 16,500 9,187 12,094 4,406 735 14 RENTAL/LEASE 2,091,693 632,371 838,322 1,253,371 40° 15 INSURANCE 503,161 405,121 503,160 1 1000/ 16 UTILITIES 529,462 211,763 238,995 290,467 45° 17 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 1,090,350 239,473 237,263 853,087 22° 18 MISCELLANEOUS 652,023 220,361 248,404 403,619 380/ 19 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 1000/ 20 BUILDINGS - - 45,195 (45,195) 0°. 21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,385,000 - 1,385,000 09 22 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 96,343 (96,343) 00/ 23 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 270,180 - 270,180 0° 24 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 55,170 55,170 00/ 25 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 4,790 4,790 09 26 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 268,788 - 268,788 0° 27 OTHER INT EREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 212 288 425 22,360,872 17,443,966 19,144,538 33,216,334 379 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009) 28 BENEFITS $ - $ 89,347 $ 78,420 $ (78,420) 0° 29 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 252,990 53,925 33,405 219,585 139 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 - 13,704 (6,704) 196° 31 MISCELLANEOUS 500 485 15 970/ 260,490 -143272 126,014 134,476 489 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFTFUND (014) 32 SUPPLIES $ 100 $ $ - $ 100 0° 33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 200 09 34 MISCELLANEOUS 5,600 5,600 09 5,900 5,900 0° BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016) 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 195,000 $ $ 450 $ 194,550 09 36 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 150,000 16,072 133,928 11° 37 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 90,000 552 89,448 15 38 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 110,000 - 110,000 09 545,000 17,074 527,926 37 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION (017) 39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ - $ 16,149 $ - $ - 09 16,149 - 00, EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018) 40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 200,000 $ - $ $ 200,000 09 200,000 200,000 09 DRUG ENFORCEMEINTFUND (104) 41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 45,000 $ $ $ 45,000 09 42 REPAIR/MAINT 800 800 09 45,800 45,800 0° t O CL is C R C LL s_ C O 2 N N 0 N R O C. O C O C iL z C O z N N 0 N tv C N sr t c� O r Q 24 Packet Pg. 31 I 6.2.a I C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent STREErFUND (111) l SALARIES AND WAGES $ 749,110 $ 309,006 $ 290,997 $ 458,113 390/ 2 OVERTIME 38,400 17,419 13,596 24,804 3 5 $ 3 BENEFIT S 347,919 152,118 142,682 205,237 4 1 $ 4 UNIFORMS 6,000 5,432 3,912 2,088 65° 5 SUPPLIES 263,000 82,801 47,993 215,007 189 6 SMALL EQUIPMENT 20,000 770 985 19,015 59 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,210 4,378 9,905 13,305 430. 8 COMMUNICATIONS 4,500 2,391 2,426 2,074 549 9 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 09 10 RENTAL/LEASE 290,150 102,337 120,178 169,972 41°, 11 INSURANCE 184,111 148,533 184,111 0 100° 12 UTILITIES 273,730 99,443 88,863 184,867 329 13 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 72,000 9,065 18,073 53,927 250/ 14 MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 10,417 10,891 (2,891) 1360. 15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 30,000 - - 30,000 09 16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 4,270 4,270 09 17INTEREST 380 380 09 $ 2,315,780 $ 944,110 $ 934,609 $ 1,381,171 40° COMBINED STREEI'CONST/IMPROVE(112) 18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 3,159,560 $ 435,017 $ 203,066 $ 2,956,494 65 19 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 1,508,270 - 21,729 1,486,541 15 20 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 108,975 - - 108,975 0° 21 LAND - (842) 36,264 (36,264) 09 22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 8,018,521 211,005 270,868 7,747,653 39 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,220 72,201 72,201 19 100° 24INTEREST 1,250 1,591 1,230 20 9M $ 12,868,796 $ 718,973 $ 605,359 $ 12,263,437 501 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) 25 SUPPLIES $ 4,700 $ 265 $ 548 $ 4,152 120/ 26 SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,700 - - 1,700 09 27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 180,000 11,922 15,328 164,672 90/ 28 TRAVEL 80 - - 80 0° 29 RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 2,000 00/ 30 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 00/ 31 MISCELLANEOUS 6,600 912 1,064 5,536 16° $ 195,380 $ 13,098 $ 16,940 $ 178,440 90i HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) 32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,900 $ 16,876 $ 19,714 $ 76,186 21° 33 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 - - 1,000 0° 34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 4,000 - - 4,000 09 $ 100,900 $ 16,876 $ 19,714 $ 81,186 200/ EMPLOYEEPARKING PERMIT FUND (121) 35 SUPPLIES $ 1,790 $ - $ - $ 1,790 09 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,090 25,090 09 $ 26,880 $ $ $ 26,880 0°. YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) 37 MISCELLANEOUS $ 3,000 $ $ $ 3,000 09 $ 3,000 $ $ $ 3,000 09 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123) 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 28,200 $ $ 533 $ 27,667 20i $ 28,200 $ $ 533 $ 27,667 20i O N is C R C LL 21 s_ C O 2 N N 0 N A O O O. d w <0 C C iL s C O a N N 0 N T M 2 w C N E t U O r r Q 25 Packet Pg. 32 I 6.2.a I CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL ES TATE EXC IS E TAX 2 (125) 1 SUPPLIES $ 21,000 $ 26,431 $ 11,221 $ 9,779 53° 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 469,320 38,094 90,527 378,793 19$ 3 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 668,258 12,046 56,569 611,689 8$ 4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2,534 - - 2,534 00/ 5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,428,576 41,495 484,788 2,943,788 14° $ 4,589,688 $ 118,066 $ 643,105 $ 3,946,583 14$ REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126) 6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 10 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 11 INTEREST 12 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) 13 SUPPLIES 14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15 MISCELLANEOUS 16 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES C KWEIERY MAINTENANC UIMPRO VE VIENT (130) 17 SALARIES AND WAGES 18 OVERTIME 19 BENEFIT S 20 UNIFORMS 21 SUPPLIES 22 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24 COMMUNICATIONS 25 TRAVEL 26 RENTAL/LEASE 27 UTILITIES 28 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 29 MISCELLANEOUS PARKS TRUST FUND (136) 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CEIMIEIERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137) 31 SMALL EQUIPMENT SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) 32 SUPPLIES 33 TRAVEL 34 MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS IMPROVEMEVTDISTRICTFUND (140) 35 SUPPLIES 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37 MISCELLANEOUS EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142) 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE FUND (143) 39 SUPPLIES 40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 41 LAND 2012 LTGO DEBTSERVIC FUND (231) 42 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 43 INTEREST $ 673,827 $ 140,621 $ 23,581 $ 650,246 3° 878,353 14,138 13,266 865,087 2° 144,970 - - 144,970 0° 526,057 180,242 97,473 428,584 19° 149,820 - - 149,820 0° 110,640 - 110,640 0° - - 380 (380) 0O� $ 2,483,667 $ 335,001 $ 134,700 $ 2,348,967 5° $ 45,000 $ 10,981 $ 4,334 $ 40,666 109 6,500 - - 6,500 00/ 600 600 0° 26,300 - - 26,300 09 $ 78,400 $ 10,981 $ 4,334 $ 74,066 69 $ 119,837 $ 37,641 $ 39,143 $ 80,694 339 3,500 249 492 3,008 145 41,069 16,276 16,016 25,053 390. 1,000 - - 1,000 0° 7,000 289 410 6,590 69 20,000 13,501 9,933 10,067 505 4,200 800 1,150 3,050 27° 1,700 701 716 984 420 500 - - 500 0° 11,690 6,938 4,890 6,800 420, 5,565 1,671 1,876 3,689 345 500 19,211 - 500 09 4,000 2,567 3,868 132 979 $ 220,561 $ 99,844 $ 78,494 $ 142,067 36° $ 50,000 $ $ 2,540 $ 47,460 59 $ 50,000 $ $ 2,540 $ 47,460 5° $ 25,000 $ $ $ 25,000 09 $ 25,000 $ $ $ 25,000 09 $ 1,500 $ $ $ 1,500 00, 4,500 4,500 0° 5,900 70 5,830 1° $ 11,900 $ $ 70 $ 11,830 1° $ 4,050 $ 273 $ 466 $ 3,584 11O 77,535 18,903 20,190 57,345 26° 6,095 974 222 5,873 49 87,680 S 20,149 20,878 66,802 247 $ 6,077,492 $ - $ 380,776 $ 5,696,716 6° $ 6,077,492 380,776 5,696,716 60i $ 1,000 $ $ $ 1,000 0° 14,800 14,800 0O 199,000 199,000 09 214,800 214,800 00/ $ 550,000 $ $ $ 550,000 0$ 61,370 61,370 0O $ 611,370 $ $ $ 611,370 0° O N 2 C R C LL z C O 2 N N 0 N R O C. to <0 C C iL z C O z N N 0 N c0 C d t t� r w Q 26 Packet Pg. 33 I 6.2.a I C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining % Spent PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332) 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,832 $ 88,129 $ 170,170 $ (74,338) 1780 2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 63,000 - 62,656 344 99° 3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 7,357,188 85,838 2,090,315 5,266,873 289 4 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 98,398 - - 98,398 0° $ 7,614,418 $ 173,967 $ 2,323,141 $ 5,291,277 31° WATER FUND (421) 5 SALARIES AND WAGES 6 OVERTIME 7 BENEFIT S 8 UNIFORMS 9 SUPPLIES 10 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 11 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 12 SMALL EQUIPMENT 13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14 COMMUNICATIONS 15 TRAVEL 16 EXCISE TAXES 17 RENTAL/LEASE 18INSURANCE 19 UTILITIES 20 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 21 MISCELLANEOUS 22 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 23 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 24 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 25 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 26 REVENUE BONDS 27 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 28 INTEREST 29 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS STORM FUND (422) 30 SALARIES AND WAGES 31 OVERTIME 32 BENEFIT S 33 UNIFORMS 34 SUPPLIES 35 SMALL EQUIPMENT 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37 COMMUNICATIONS 38 TRAVEL 39 EXCISE TAXES 40 RENTAL/LEASE 41 INSURANCE 42 UTILITES 43 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 44 MISCELLANEOUS 45 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 46 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 47 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 48 REVENUE BONDS 49 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 50 INTEREST 51 OTHER INT EREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS $ 842,096 $ 279,505 $ 318,564 $ 523,532 380. 24,000 7,476 6,449 17,551 279 330,100 119,453 133,792 196,309 41°, 4,000 2,691 2,189 1,811 550 150,000 35,444 56,039 93,961 370. 2,170,000 404,550 535,745 1,634,255 259 170,000 83,879 72,908 97,092 43° O 11,000 3,917 2,527 8,473 230/ y 2,237,439 502,107 279,744 1,957,695 13° 30,000 11,346 13,234 16,766 44° 200 - - 200 0° 1,649,700 533,294 528,176 1,121,524 32, 152,590 51,147 62,765 89,825 41° S 122,359 98,196 122,359 (0) 1009 M 35,000 12,746 13,870 21,130 40° 1 176,130 11,030 11,863 164,267 79 -,E 123,600 78,367 84,834 38,766 69° C 645,370 - - 645,370 0° M 10,000 - - 10,000 O° cm 1,998,334 7,513 87,212 1,911,122 49, C 2,870 - - 2,870 05 N 399,780 - - 399,780 00. 25,840 25,839 25,839 1 100° 180,580 517 388 180,192 00. " 378 (378) 00i $ 11,490,988 $ 2,269,017 $ 2,358,873 $ 9,132,115 210 CL O w $ 734,284 $ 293,430 $ 323,817 $ 410,467 44° 26,000 13,629 9,276 16,724 369 2 294,767 129,324 133,632 161,135 45° r- 6,500 4,555 5,543 957 850 46,000 20,636 25,327 20,674 55°LL 4,000 304 985 3,015 255 3,481,263 646,874 334,006 3,147,257 10° s 3,200 2,078 2,087 1,113 659 C 4,300 150 - 4,300 0° 0 470,100 267,737 293,490 176,610 629 267,150 110,071 109,858 157,292 N 41° N 82,335 66,228 82,335 (0) 1009 N 10,500 6,541 7,120 3,380 68° 67,130 19,187 11,302 55,828 179 232,300 113,101 88,269 144,031 3 M 297,787 - - 297,787 00/ 3,137,333 25,974 281,617 2,855,716 99 d 104,540 - - 104,540 0°. s 195,390 - - 195,390 09 t� 53,590 53,576 32,063 21,528 600z w 101,180 6,450 481 100,699 00/ Q - - 165 (165) 00. $ 9,619,649 $ 1,779,846 $ 1,741,370 $ 7,878,279 180/ 27 Packet Pg. 34 I 6.2.a I CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent SEWER FUND (423) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,090,461 $ 738,775 $ 752,725 $ 1,337,736 36° 2 OVERTIME 95,000 55,459 59,197 35,803 62° 3 BENEFITS 847,408 326,266 300,600 546,808 35° 4 UNIFORMS 9,500 7,806 7,197 2,303 76° 5 SUPPLIES 421,000 181,030 131,870 289,130 31° 6 FUEL CONSUMED 60,000 34,804 - 60,000 00/ 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE 4,000 - - 4,000 00/ 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 35,000 72,416 95,443 (60,443) 2730 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,315,884 1,475,846 923,642 1,392,242 400z 10 COMMUNICATIONS 43,000 16,111 19,269 23,731 459 11 TRAVEL 5,000 1,793 - 5,000 09 12 EXCISE TAXES 978,000 459,635 412,890 565,110 420 13 RENTAL/LEASE 317,410 162,475 134,401 183,009 425 14 INSURANCE 202,407 162,851 203,936 (1,529) 101° 15 UTILITIES 1,532,060 537,547 1,068,598 463,462 70° 16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 790,630 78,744 392,452 398,178 50° 17 MISCELLANEOUS 126,350 - 68,126 58,224 54° 18 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 61,364 98,103 (98,103) 0° 19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 6,388,519 1,627,061 - 6,388,519 00/ 20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 12,520,297 2,615,898 1,564,772 10,955,525 129 21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 126,500 - - 126,500 05 22 REVENUE BONDS 89,840 - - 89,840 09 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 174,610 158,667 159,017 15,593 919 24INTEREST 356,980 5,506 4,589 352,391 19 25 DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 1,518 - - 09 26 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 2,252 2,959 (2,959) 0° $ 29,529,856 $ 8,783,826 $ 6,399,786 $ 23,130,070 27 BOND RESERVE FUND (424) 27 REVENUE BONDS $ 810,010 $ - $ - $ 810,010 M 28INTEREST 1,178,700 - 1,178,700 00/ $ 1,988,710 $ - $ $ 1,988,710 09 O N C R C I.L z C O 2 N N O N W O Q d <0 C C IL z r C O a N N O N fC C N E t C� r r Q 28 Packet Pg. 35 I 6.2.a I CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title 2022 Amended Budget 5/31/2021 Expenditures 5/31/2022 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 275,712 $ 114,037 $ 124,683 $ 151,029 4501 2 OVERTIME 2,000 1,573 222 1,778 110 3 BENEFITS 112,077 48,111 48,014 64,063 439 4 UNIFORMS 1,500 969 785 715 520 5 SUPPLIES 120,000 22,912 55,588 64,412 469 6 FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 00/ 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 268,000 64,789 173,973 94,027 65°. 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 5,979 2,072 55,928 40i 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46,750 530 597 46,153 1° 10 COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 877 864 2,136 29° 11 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 05 12 RENTAL/LEASE 11,160 5,164 4,311 6,849 39° 13 INSURANCE 49,172 39,334 51,903 (2,731) 1060 14 UTILITIES 14,000 8,234 9,675 4,325 690 15 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,000 8,525 14,102 45,898 249 16 MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 6,953 1,733 10,267 149 17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 915,000 72,772 25,960 889,040 39 $ 1,950,371 $ 400,759 $ 514,481 $ 1,435,890 269 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512) 18 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 442,074 $ 129,943 $ 111,086 $ 330,988 250 19 OVERTIME 2,000 1,314 - 2,000 00/ 20 BENEFITS 159,538 43,581 43,470 116,068 279 21 SUPPLIES 5,000 2,571 4,036 964 810z 22 SMALL EQUIPMENT 357,900 10,575 21,731 336,170 6° 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61,860 17,652 6,359 55,501 10° 24 COMMUNICATIONS 58,770 21,633 20,362 38,408 35° 25 TRAVEL 1,500 - - 1,500 00 26 RENTAL/LEASE 7,460 1,833 1,858 5,602 259 27 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 381,920 230,799 393,720 (11,800) 1039 28 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 1,061 424 4,576 80 29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - - 56,000 09 $ 1,539,022 $ 460,963 $ 603,046 $ 935,976 399 FIREMAN'S PENSION FUND (617) 30 BENEFIT S $ - $ 12,911 $ - $ - 00/ 31 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 21,968 - 0° $ - $ 34,879 $ - $ - 0° TO TAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS $ 147,140,570 $ 33,783,742 $ 36,070,376 $ 111,070,194 25° O N is C R C LL 21 s_ C O 2 N N O N A O O O- LL C R C iL z r C O a N N O N fC C N E t U M r r Q 29 Packet Pg. 36 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL OFFICE OF MAYOR HUMAN RESOURCES MUNICIPAL COURT CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CITY ATTORNEY NON -DEPARTMENTAL POLICE SERVICES SATELLITE OFFICE COMMUNITY SERVICESIECONOMIC DEV DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM PARKS& RECREATION PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Title $ 497,900 $ 137,169 $ 129,439 $ 368,461 26% 443,913 138,910 148,671 295,242 33% 824,831 319,298 334,902 489,929 41% 1,368,755 445,221 482,322 886,433 35% - 328,247 - - 0% 2,156,911 490,038 901,287 1,255,624 42% 971,780 352,348 388,315 583,465 40% Q. 15,574,121 5,278,401 6,003,725 9,570,396 39% N 13,375,470 4,751,092 5,133,192 8,242,278 3870 'V C 166,576 - 37,314 129,262 22% C 719,388 198,730 216,588 502,800 30% L 3,791,859 1,185,423 1,419,912 2,371,947 37% 2 C 459,109 23,568 39,490 419,619 9% 0 5,125,535 1,604,251 1,709,327 3,416,208 33% N 0 3,459,449 1,334,684 1,258,052 2,201,397 36% 3,425,275 856,587 942,003 2,483,272 28% to $ 52,360,872 $ 17,443,966 $ 19,144,538 $ 33,216,334 37%+ O C. O C ITY O F EDMO NDS v C EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY E IL 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount 2' Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent z WATER UTILITY FUND $ 11,490,988 $ 2,269,017 $ 2,358,873 $ 9,132,115 O 21% E STORM UTILITY FUND 9,619,649 1,779,846 1,741,370 7,878,279 N 18% p SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,529,856 8,783,826 6,399,786 23,130,070 N 22% >, BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 - - 1,988,710 0% $ 52,629,203 $ 12,832,689 $ 10,500,030 $ 42,129,173 20% N E t c� O r r Q 30 Packet Pg. 37 I 6.2.a I CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Title 2022 Amended Budget 5/31/2021 Expenditures 5/31/2022 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent C ITY C O UNC IL SALARIES AND WAGES $ 204,132 $ 83,172 $ 73,008 $ 131,124 36% BENEFITS 121,868 43,547 38,986 82,882 32% SUPPLIES 2,000 1,657 1,006 994 50% SERVICES 169,900 8,794 16,439 153,461 10% $ 497,900 $ 137,169 $ 129,439 $ 368,461 26% O FFIC E O F MAYO R SALARIES AND WAGES $ 232,296 $ 95,623 $ 103,440 $ 128,856 45% BENEFITS 81,787 35,211 35,811 45,976 44% SUPPLIES 1,500 246 1,555 (55) 104% SERVICES 128,330 7,830 7,865 120,465 6% $ 443,913 $ 138,910 $ 148,671 $ 295,242 33% p HUMAN RES O URC ES G' N SALARIES AND WAGES $ 398,299 $ 178,353 $ 194,660 $ 203,639 49% BENEFITS 142,526 66,721 67,416 75,110 47% cC SUPPLIES 13,600 896 701 12,899 5% SERVICES 270,406 73,328 72,125 198,281 27% ca $ 824,831 $ 319,298 $ 334,902 $ 489,929 41% LL MUNIC IPAL C O URT >, SALARIES AND WAGES $ 910,606 $ 283,069 $ 315,526 $ 595,080 35% z BENEFITS 217,654 94,471 93,801 123,853 43% C SUPPLIES 11,600 3,065 4,714 6,886 41% C SERVICES 228,895 64,615 68,281 160,614 30% N $ 1,368,755 $ 445,221 $ 482,322 $ 886,433 35% C CITY CLERK N SALARIES AND WAGES $ $ 166,661 $ $ 0% M BENEFITS 67,480 0% SUPPLIES 530 0%' SERVICES 93,577 0% C0. $ - $ 328,247 $ $ - 0% ADMINIS TRATIVE S ERVIC ES SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,301,073 $ 309,094 $ 557,511 $ 743,562 43% 'tt BENEFITS 413,858 101,366 180,965 232,893 44% SUPPLIES 13,000 2,038 5,268 7,732 41% SERVICES 428,980 77,540 157,541 271,439 37% LL $ 2,156,911 $ 490,038 $ 901,287 $ 1,255,624 42% t C ITY ATTO RNEY C SERVICES $ 971,780 $ 352,348 $ 388,315 $ 583,465 40% 0 $ 971,780 $ 352,348 $ 388,315 $ 583,465 40% N NON -DEPARTMENTAL N SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,750 $ - $ - $ 101,750 0% N BENEFITS 145,504 24,849 53,452 92,052 37% SUPPLIES 5,000 1,152 - 5,000 0% SERVICES 13,557,619 5,202,399 5,900,062 7,657,557 44% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,435,000 50,000 50,000 1,385,000 3% N DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL 55,170 - - 55,170 0% E DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST 274,078 - 212 273,866 0% V $ 15,574,121 $ 5,278,401 $ 6,003,725 $ 9,570,396 39% r PO LIC E S ERVIC ES w Q SALARIES AND WAGES $ 8,723,512 $ 3,167,922 $ 3,281,239 $ 5,442,273 38% BENEFITS 2,994,876 1,119,716 1,160,454 1,834,422 39% SUPPLIES 281,569 113,055 81,278 200,291 29% SERVICES 1,375,513 350,398 513,878 861,635 37% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 96,343 (96,343) 0% $ 13,375,470 $ 4,751,092 $ 5,133,192 $ 8,242,278 38% SATELLITE O FFIC E SALARIES AND WAGES $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0% BENEFIT S 5,000 - 5,000 0% SUPPLIES 12,000 11,057 943 92% SERVICES 124,576 26,257 98,319 21% $ 166,576 $ $ 37,314 $ 129,262 22% 31 Packet Pg. 38 I 6.2.a I CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2022 Amended 5/31/2021 5/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining % Spent COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES AND WAGES $ 365,627 $ 121,109 $ 82,411 $ 283,216 23% BENEFITS 111,361 36,570 26,776 84,585 24% SUPPLIES 4,075 ill 269 3,806 7% SERVICES 238,325 40,941 107,133 131,192 45% $ 719,388 $ 198,730 $ 216,588 $ 502,800 30% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES /PLANNING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,978,832 $ 736,032 $ 858,176 $ 1,120,656 43% BENEFITS 681,706 268,969 295,708 385,998 43% SUPPLIES 19,400 3,024 2,993 16,407 15% SERVICES 1,111,921 177,398 263,035 848,886 24% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 0% $ 3,791,859 $ 1,185,423 $ 1,419,912 $ 2,371,947 37% HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,496 $ 19,015 $ 25,307 $ 76,189 25% BENEFITS 29,113 4,352 5,024 24,089 17% SUPPLIES 15,000 - 442 14,558 3 % SERVICES 313,500 201 8,717 304,783 3% 459,109 23,568 39,490 419,619 9% PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,627,863 $ 930,633 $ 968,866 $ 1,658,997 37% BENEFITS 865,945 343,355 334,040 531,905 39% SUPPLIES 166,640 60,415 72,169 94,471 43% SERVICES 1,465,087 269,848 334,252 1,130,835 23% $ 5,125,535 $ 1,604,251 $ 1,709,327 $ 3,416,208 33% PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION SALARIES AND WAGES $ 387,424 $ 124,742 $ 54,659 $ 332,765 14% BENEFITS 126,689 44,170 26,359 100,330 21% SUPPLIES 9,600 6,863 1,733 7,867 18% SERVICES 90,400 36,685 34,487 55,913 38% $ 614,113 $ 212,461 $ 117,239 $ 496,874 19% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES AND WAGES 860,456 339,698 358,167 502,289 42% BENEFITS 369,679 146,470 143,049 226,630 39% SUPPLIES 128,000 49,301 34,777 93,223 27% SERVICES 1,796,960 321,119 360,816 1,436,144 20% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 270,180 45,195 224,986 17% $ 3,425,275 $ 856,587 $ 942,003 $ 2,483,272 28% ENGINEERING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,866,128 $ 734,034 $ 769,240 $ 1,096,888 41% BENEFITS 702,578 295,252 285,116 417,462 41% SUPPLIES 2,200 795 - 2,200 0% SERVICES 274,430 92,143 86,457 187,973 32% $ 2,845,336 $ 1,122,224 $ 1,140,813 $ 1,704,523 40% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 52,360,872 $ 17,443,966 $ 19,144,538 $ 33,216,334 37% GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW O N is C R C LL z C O 2 N N O N R O M d oc <0 C O C iL s r C O z N N O N O C N 1= t c� O r r Q Packet Pg. 39 6.2.a BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- & SUBFUNDS 5/31/2022 5/31/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 001-General Fund * $ 16,181,227 $ 8,761,345 $ (4,571,033) $ 249,878 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 129,204 129,204 (88,086) (126,014 011-Risk Management Reserve Fund 25,000 25,000 - - 012-Contingency Reserve Fund 1,782,150 1,782,150 - - 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 16,422 16,421 - - 016-Building Maintenance 4,396,947 4,396,947 (1,263) (3,053 0 a 017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation 848,617 848,616 - - Total General Fund & Subfunds $ 23,379,567 $ 15,959,684 $ (4,660,382) $ 120,811 c c� c *$8,067,160 of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,782,150 balance in Fund 012, represent the required L 20% operating reserve. r c 0 There are no interfund loans outstanding at this time. a N N O N W GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW ° U BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES u_ 21 GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- r_ FUNDS 5/31/2022 5/31/2022 Q1 YTD 0 Fund Balance Cash Balance N 0 N General Fund & Subfunds $ 23,379,567 $ 15,959,684 $ (4,660,382) $ 120,811 0 Special Revenue 19,352,725 18,056,261 669,865 974,003 Debt Service 30,871 30,871 - 30,871 a� Capital Projects 2,601,666 3,097,199 (822,073) (1,512,197 t u Total Governmental Funds $ 45,364,829 $ 37,144,015 $ (4,812,590) $ (386,512 Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW 33 Packet Pg. 40 6.2.a BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- SPECIAL REVENUE 5/31/2022 5/31/2022 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund $ 75,904 $ 76,404 $ 578 $ 729 1 1 1 - Street Fund 565,967 428,382 (290,638) (385,198 112- Combined Street Const/Improve 2,877,394 1,901,110 671,892 638,947 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 716,215 719,677 64,290 67,337 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 86,574 73,337 11,410 15,460 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 88,193 88,587 8,246 11,669 122 -Youth Scholarship Fund 14,398 14,471 110 139 p 123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 107,860 103,793 7,199 11,888 W 125 - Real Estate Tax 2 4,221,929 4,220,336 4,384 168,514 W 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 ' 3,984,337 3,813,251 290,145 670,998 •3 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 372,111 373,694 63,468 70,587 130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 272,622 274,747 6,013 6,416 LL 136 - Parks Trust Fund 167,682 168,549 1,294 (908 >, 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 1,126,971 1,132,668 14,031 19,896 r 138 - Sister City Commission 15,560 15,640 119 80 0 140 -Business Improvement Disrict 62,872 62,872 26,311 33,740 N 141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing I'd 183,701 176,308 23,034 24,287 c 142-Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 4,391,605 4,391,605 (232,175) (380,776 143 -Tree Fund 20,830 20,830 157 198 W Total Special Revenue $ 19,352,725 $ 18,056,261 $ 669,865 $ 974,003 M *$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $500,000 for o the purchase of Open Space. ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW U_ 21 BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 0 ENTERPRISE ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- c FUNDS 5/31/2022 5/31/2022 Q1 YTD N Fund Balance Cash Balance 421 -Water Utility Fund $ 30,471,861 $ 8,149,393 $ 1,131,430 $ 1,744,693 c 422-Storm Utility Fund 16,777,183 6,655,910 841,415 1,129,805 a� E 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 61,900,750 16,972,271 1,424,379 1,548,221 u 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 845,076 845,076 3 1,115 Q 411 -Combined Utility Operation 70,785 114,581 46,790 70,785 Total Enterprise Funds $ 110,065,655 $ 32,737,231 $ 3,444,017 $ 4,494,619 *$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding. *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. SUMMARY OVERVIEW 34 Packet Pg. 41 I 6.2.a I CITY-WIDE Governmental Funds Enterprise Funds Internal Services Fund Total City-wide Total BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- 5/31/2022 5/31/2022 Fund Balance Cash Balance $ 45,364,829 $ 37,144,015 $ 110,065,655 32,737,231 10,415,270 5,998,310 $ 165,845,754 $ 75,879,556 $ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- Q1 YTD (4,812,590) $ 3,444,017 (93,646) (1,462,219) $ (386,512 4,494,619 127,718 4,235,826 0 a� c LL 2, 0 M N N BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES N INTERNAL SERVICE ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS I 5/31/2022 5/31/2022 Q1 YTD t 511 -Equipment Rental Fund 512 -Technology Rental Fund Total Internal Service Funds Fund Balance Cash Balance $ 9,455,834 $ 5,209,198 $ 959,436 789,112 $ 10,415,270 $ 5,998,310 1 $ 117,520 $ (211,166) (93,646) $ 0 Q. m 247,323 .v (119,605 c 127,718 M 21 t c 0 Z M Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 35 Packet Pg. 42 May 2022 Financial Report July 12, 2022 N I 0 r d d E E O U m v c m c ii r c m E t Op Eb4 f0 Q Packet Pg. 43 Noteworthy items: • Page 4 & 19 — REET revenues are down $405,510 from this time last year, but only $42,632 under budget. • Page 21— Sales Tax is up $561,209 from this time last year. • Page 21— Gas Utility Tax is up $56,776 from this point in time last year (colder than usual "spring"). • Page 22 — Parks & Recreation Program Fees are up $136,020 from this point in time last year. • Page 22 — Interfund Reimbursement — Contract Services —January through May of 2022 Engineering Overhead has not yet been recorded; we are waiting on this from Engineering. January through May of 2021 was a total of $905,601. • Page 23 — Traffic Infraction Penalties is down $(60,448) from this point in time last year (vacancy in the Enforcement Officer position). of F.D y Q Packet Pg. 44 Sales Tax Revenues for 5 months ended May 31 $561,000 ahead of last year, and $590,000 ahead of budget Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly YID Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Act uaIs Jcnuury $ I-ebruory A/lo rch April May June July August September October November December 763,651 $ 1,704,609 2,420,254 3,074,639 3,893,081 4,672,507 5,523,403 6,439,084 7,293, 649 8,203,996 9,139,425 10,000,000 763,651 $ 940,958 715,646 6S4,384 818,442 1 l9,426 850,896 915,680 854,565 910,347 935,429 860,575 857,872 1,853,000 2,666,259 3,469,412 4,483,349 Variance 4YU 12.34% 8.71% 10.16% 12.84% 15.16% Sales and Use Tax l l .000.000 10.000.000 9.000.000 8.000.000 7.000.000 6.000, 000 5.000.000 4.000.000 3.000.000 2, 000, 000 1, 000,000 0 JAN FEB NLAR APR MAY UL AUCT SEP (_)(`T [_] I)EC =—"— C•urrerit Yeu —Budget Prior Yew 0 ,z LL t c 0 a N N 0 N f3 N I ti 0 m m r E E 0 U a� C Cu iic r c m E U 2 w Q Packet Pg. 45 Sales Tax Revenues for 12 months ended May 31, by Category Sales Tax Analysis By Category CUITent Period: May 2022 Year -to -Date Total $4,483,349 Autormtive Repair, Anus mes engnt & r Recreation. $29,916 Construction Trade. Health & $697,508 Personal Care, Business Services. Acconin dation. $119,935 $507364 Gasoline, $13,014 $15,095 0050- --Retail Food Stores, Clothing and $144383 Accessories, $141,889 Retail Automotive. Con><mrnications, Misc Retail. $1.081.027 $104.216 Wholesale Trade, $1 %497 Others. $73,350 Manufacturing. $52,254 Eating & Drinking. $458,502 Real Estate Excise Tax Revenues for 5 months ended May 31 Under budget by $43,000 (97.3%) Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals ilariance % January 381,097 381,097 377,895 -0.84% February 611,562 230,465 620,392 1.44 March 952,142 340,580 793,926 -16.62% April 1,227,434 275,291 1,165,9.30 -5.01°r6 May 1,586,772 359,339 1,544,140 -2.69% June 1,961,879 375,106 July 2,368,248 406,370 August 2,810,074 441,826 ,September 3,256,638 446,564 October 3,66C,486 403,848 November 4,056,561 396,075 December 4,40C,000 343,439 5, 500.000 5,000.000 4.500.000 4,000_000 3,500,000 3,000.000 2, 500.000 2,000._000 1, 500.000 1,000_000 500.000 0 JANT Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & FEB M_-�R APR MAY JUN JUL ALTG 5EP OC'T NOV DEC --"wm*C iuTent Year -Budget Prior Year 0 ,z i_ c 0 a N N 0 N f3 N ti I 0 r m m r E 0 U cu iic r c 0 E U 2 w r Q Packet Pg. 47 Preliminary results are in for last year: The General Fund's ending fund balance at 12/31/2021 is $15,931,353, the City's largest ever. See attached P&L. Ending Fund Balance - General Fund $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Op EprVQ�O -it w Packet Pg. 48 Preliminary results are in for last year: The General Fund's ending fund balance at 12/31/2021 is $15,931,353, the City's largest ever. Edmonds - General Fund, Budget and Actual for 2021 Revenues Expenses Revenues over (under) Expenses Net Transfers (Out) Net Change in Fund Balance Fund Balance, 1f 1f 2021 Fund Balance, 12/31/2021 Final Budget 42,187,229 (45,353,097) {3,165,868) (529,332) {3,695,200) 13,968,745 $ 10,173,545 Actual ResuJts $ 43,697,155 (41,365,223) 2,331,932 (269,323) 2,062,609 13,868,745 $ 15,931,354 Variance from Budget 1,509,926 3,987,874 5,497,800 260,009 5,757,809 $ 5,757,809 Per Preliminary Annual Report, NOT incl. GF Sub Funds 0 U- 0 a N N O N fC N i 0 a� r m m E E 0 U m v c ca U- c m E t U r �y of Eb4f0� Q w o Packet Pg. 49 Preliminary results are in for last year City-wide Budget compared to Actual Results Edmonds - Preliminary pity -wide Results, Budget and Actual for 2021 Revenues Expenses Revenues over (under) Expenses Fund Balance, 1/1/2021 Fund Balance, 12/31/2021 Final Budget 120,280,616 (135,015,309) (14,734,693) 13701980098 1221463AO5 Actual Results $ 124,475,732 (113,490,582) 10,985,150 13701980098 148J83i248 Variance from Budget $ 4,195,116 211524,727 2517191943 $ 2517191943 Per Preliminary December Monthly Report How budgets work is important to understand as we move into discussions of the upcoming 2023 budget. 0 0 0 LL 0 a N N 0 N N �I 0 E 0 U 0 0 S U_ 0 E w Op E04f0 Q Packet Pg. 50 With $ 16 million of fund balance in the General Fund alone, the city remains in a very strong position financially. General Fund Total and Restricted Fund Balance, and Contingency Fund Reserves per December Monthly Report $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $8,438,022 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,493,332 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,768,863 $2,000,000 General Fund, Contingency Fund 001 Fund 012 ■ Reserved (Restricted) Fund Balance ■ Unrestricted Fund Balance This is important to know as we move into discussions of the upcoming 2023 budget. 0 LL 0 a N N O N N �I 0 a� E E 0 U a� c cu i�c c a� E L) w Op E04f0 Q Packet Pg. 51 Thank you. E w Op Eb4 f0 Q Packet Pg. 52 6.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Written Public Comments Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of written public comments. Narrative Public comments submitted to the web form for public comments <https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment> between June 23, 2022 and July 13, 2022. Attachments: public comments 20220719 Packet Pg. 53 6.3.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 7/19/2022 Submitted on: 7/5/2022 10:22:07 AM Name: Pam Brisse City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: I support Edmonds City Council Resolution in support of abortion rights and other reproductive rights. Comments: I support the original resolution written by Laura Johnson and Susan Paine. Abortion rights go both ways - one person's ability to choose an abortion gives another person the right to refuse an abortion when doctors deem it necessary. Roe v. Wade protected both points of view. Now those protections are gone. Where does that end, if the state can force someone to have an abortion, can they also force someone to donate a kidney? It's a slippery slope when you begin to lose your rights, what will be taken away next? Submitted on: 7/5/2022 9:26:27 PM Name: Natalie Seitz City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: July 19th Public Comment Comments: I would like to take tonight and continue to submit my comments previously provided to council on June 26th into the public record. The following is feedback you received and ultimately disregarded by the City Council: • Chapter 6 -Recreation Programs - The City did a walkability analysis to the recreational facilities located identified on page 86, but provides no text analysis of that accessibility gap within the recreation programs section. Please include text analysis of accessibility in the "program considerations" on page 89. • Figure 28, Map 13 & 14 - The City erroneously identifies a trail south west of Matthey Ballinger Park. Please see the previously referenced e-mail from the PUD identifying that there is no access or agreement between the City and the PUD for areas south west of the park and that this area is signposted "no trespassing." Please adjust all figures and tables to remove this trail segment from the depictions and calculations of existing City services. • Trail system design considerations, pg. 101 and recommendations on pg. 102 - This section should include a discussion of trail security based on recent crimes along the Interurban trial near Matthey Ballinger park and security concerns raised during the second community meeting. • Goals and Objective, pg. 104 - Discussion of the Growth Management Act should include specific reference to the park commitments made as part of the 2017 Unzone of the SR99 corridor (ref. c a� E E 0 V U a. c m r Packet Pg. 54 6.3.a Ordinance 4079) as well as comprehensive plan goals to improve access to Shorelines - specifically Lake Ballinger as the only shoreline for which the city has not made advancements since the previous comprehensive plan was adopted. • Objective 2.1 - Insert open space in association to parks and programs: "... to parks, park programs, and open space and allocate...." • Objective 2.5 - Insert open space in association to parks and programs: "... to parks,park programs, and open space and allocate...." • Objective 2.6 - Include environmental education with recreational and cultural programs: "...distribution of environmental education, recreation and cultural..." • Objective 5.1- Include shorelines and lakes (A- c • Objective 5.3 - Delete "within open spaces" E E • Recommendation 1, pg. 114 - Revise topic sentence to read as follows: "The acquisition of additional j parks and open space is necessary to address existing gaps in park services, address inequities in 2 parkland distribution, and meet the Department's mission to ensure a healthy and active quality of life for all residents." m r • Recommendation 1, pg. 114 - Add bullet: Engage underserved communities during the 2024 Comprehensive planning process to identify open space acquisition priorities. M Next week I will pick up on Recommendation 2. c N N O N N C a� Submitted on: 7/5/2022 9:50:32 PM Name: Natalie Seitz City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: July 26th Public Comment Comments: I would like to continue to submit my comments previously provided to council on June 26th into the public record: • Recommendation 2, pg. 116 - Revise topic sentence so that it encompasses the identified actions: "The City should continue to seek options to expand open space through conservation or restoration of properties." • Recommendation 2, bullet 1 - Revise to include the watersheds in priority order identified by the receiving water assessment. Additional watersheds were added in order to encompass the watershed identified by Council. These watershed additions reflect a DOE -approved methodology for assessing the environmental value and included a public process. Additionally inclusion of the term "interests" allows for greater options to pursue conservation easements and other forms of public interest. Revised bullet: "Pursue opportunities to acquire property interests to conserve natural areas in Packet Pg. 55 6.3.a the Edmonds Marsh, Hall Creek -Ballinger, Lund's Gulch, Deer Creek, Shell Creek and Perrinville watersheds." • Recommendation 2, bullet 2 - Revise bullet to evaluate alternatives (including acquisition of the Unocal property) for Marsh restoration. The 2015 feasibility study and alternatives analysis for willow creek daylighting did not evaluate acquisition of the Unocal property and made several erroneous conclusions. The study should be updated to include the evaluation of: o The potential purchase of the Unocal property o Water quality impacts to fish from runoff from the Unocal property under different alternatives o Public health hazards from daylighting runoff from the Unocal property adjacent to a children's play structure and through a popular beach. E o Updated stream temperature guidelines and regulations. E 0 V o Updated costs including acquisition of the Unocal property if selected as the preferred 2 alternative IL o Risks - including risks and costs of encountering further contamination within the contaminated fill pad if excavated to accommodate a more inland alignment towards Marina Beach r o Long term maintenance costs associated with maintaining an outlet at risk of rn sedimentation o o Outcomes that could be achieved through implementation of applicable regulations or alternate interest strategies o Timeline delays associated with approaches o The study should also eliminate "political considerations" as an evaluation criteria Suggested revised bullet: Revise the 2015 Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis for Willow Creek Daylighting to address potential acquisition of the Unocal property, additional considerations and potential alignments. Develop a funding or negotiation strategy for the preferred alternative identified by the updated alternatives analysis. Packet Pg. 56 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 5, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E070522 Special Packet Pg. 57 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES July 5, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(I) At 6:15 p.m., the council convened in executive session for approximately 30 minutes to discuss pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.3 0.11 0(l)(i). 3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION The council reconvened in open session at 6:46 p.m. 4. INTERVIEW FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMITTEE 1. INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD/COMMISSION Councilmembers interviewed Jeremy Mitchell for appointment to the Historic Preservation Commission (responses in italics). Council President Olson invited Mr. Mitchell to describe his interest in serving on the HPC. My wife and I recently moved to Edmonds with our S and 3 year olds. We love Edmonds so I wanted to get involved in the community. The HPC opening came up and I have a background in architecture, doing exterior envelop related architecture for the last 16 years including a handful of historic preservation or adaptive reuse project in Seattle and Edmonds. I hope provide some insight to the HPC. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 58 7.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis said there has been interest in making the downtown core a historical district on the national historic registry. She asked his opinion on creating a historic district for an entire area. It depends on what the city wants its identity to be. All cities go through an evolutionary process. It is beneficial to target maintaining the historic identify of any city as long as it meets the business, walking, parking needs and makes it vibrant overall. A balance is needed for the city to progress forward. That is part of the HPC's responsibility, evaluation proposals and ensure they meet with the needs. Councilmember Buckshnis summarized rather than an overall district, he preferred to look at buildings case by case. Yes, you do not want to flip a switch and be historic tomorrow; that can be a forced option and can look fake. A city's identity in the long run is better preserved on a case by case basis. Councilmember Paine said the HPC is comprised of a lot of very talented people and she appreciated his background and experience with the building envelope. She asked what he would like to see in the neighborhoods and not just the downtown business core and business districts. There are some neighborhoods with unique and historic buildings. Edmonds has a lot of unique architectural styles built around the post -ware era including a lot of mid-century modern homes. My family lives in a mid-century modern home; they like that style and that style will soon be applicable for preservation. Consideration for the HPC include single houses, clusters in neighborhoods that were planned by a specific architect, and/or whether get every house with architectural significance on list. Edmonds has a unique historic dynamic, but not a lot of significant architectural styles. The mid-century aesthetic will need to be debated to what works. He recalled that was brought up at a recent HPC meeting. Councilmember Chen commented on historic funding in Everett and encouraged the HPC to explore whether Edmonds qualifies. Given his expertise and knowledge, Councilmember L. Johnson what about pitfalls that HPC can avoid, specifically where might clash with other goals in the city. The Seattle HPC put too many precedences in place where it acts against some of the zoning requirements, making it difficult for owners on the registry to do anything with a building without going through a rigorous process. It is a balancing act between the current zoning and ensuring those do not conflict. Since the HPC is advocating for promote historic preservation of qualified properties, there need to be incentives to maintain the property over time. That is where a lot of HPCs to wrong; there are too many steps in the process to maintain the building, or get on the registry so it is often a deterrent rather than welcoming. Councilmember K. Johnson commented unlike Seattle, Edmonds' historic registry is a voluntary list; owners can get on the list and, if they do not like it, they can get off the list. If an owner wants to make changes to the structure, the process involving the HPC. She welcomed him to the commission, advising the HPC's first meeting is virtual next Thursday at 5:30 p.m. Council President Olson advised his appointment is on the consent agenda and once that agenda is approved, his appointment has been confirmed. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 6:57 p.m Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 59 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 5, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E070522 Packet Pg. 60 7.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES July 5, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Whitney Rivera, Municipal Court Judge Uneek Maylor, Court Administrator Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Rob English, Acting Public Works Director Jeanie McConnell, Eng. Program Manager Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip N Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We c respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection io with the land and water." c m 3. ROLL CALL E t City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Q Councilmember Tibbott. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PRESENTATIONS MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT Municipal Court Judge Whitney Rivera reviewed: • Court Operations Update o Restarted Community Court in January 2022 ■ Many thanks to our temporary home at Community Health Center Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 61 7.2.a ■ Moved to our new Community Court Space on Highway 99 o Began processing passports in November 2021 o Completed multiple jury trials safely o Processing infractions for individuals who did not respond during COVID o Legal financial obligation relief and Unified Payment (UP) Program o Fully operational in hybrid model Photos of Edmonds Municipal Court Team and of the community court Lookin at the numbers Traffic Non- DUI/PhysicalOther Criminal Total Year Infractions Traffic Control Criminal Non- Total Criminals Infractions Traffic traffic Filings 2017 3,825 53 90 331 502 4,801 923 2018 4,547 29 144 328 466 5,514 938 2019 2,804 38 135 343 507 3,827 985 2020 1,819 32 105 183 512 2,651 800 2021 1 2,212 20 65 72 318 2,687 455 • Life Cycle: Criminal Case Filing U,1—, , Td.1 cI l" Plea sOClp"-1 C,RLJ 3 5 & J 6 on•er— r 9 GLO1,- k,gg Nni G��lln w..,-5Yean oil Ma:;mum5reeie« °J yeas P"b,11m 2 ree s v otei on Pia.=,. - • Resuming Jury Trials o Resumed in April 2021 0 171 cases set for trial o Since resuming, completed 5 jury trials and 1 bench trial o Charges included ■ Reckless driving ■ DWLS 3 + Reckless Driving ■ Two counts of stalking ■ Driving Under the Influence ■ Assault 4 (non -DV) ■ Violation of No Contact Order (DV) N N Ln O 0 w c m E 0 2 Q Community Court Update o Received a grant from the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) as part of SB 5476 o Grant goes towards enhancing and improving therapeutic programs in courts of limited jurisdiction o Vendors present during Community Court hearing dates o Connecting individuals with services to address underlying issues Statewide Leadership o DMCJA — District & Municipal Court Judges' Association o DMCMA — District and Municipal Court Management Association o MPA — Misdemeanant Probation Association Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 62 7.2.a o Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission o Washington State Minority and Justice Commission (working to identify and to eradicate the effects of racial, ethnic, and cultural bias in our state court system) Court Administration o Uneek Maylor, Court Administrator ■ District & Municipal Court Management Association (DMCMA) — Executive Board Member, Technology Chair, Education Committee Member, Long Range Planning Committee Member ■ Minority & Justice Commission Jury Demographics Study Work Group ■ Member of work group for new case management system through Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) ■ Career & technical education advisor for Edmonds School District Probation o Omar Gamez, Probation Officer ■ Training & Education Co -Chair for the Misdemeanant Probation Association ■ Committee member on Deferred Prosecution Revision workgroup ■ Misdemeanant Probation Academy Instructor at the Criminal Justice Training Center ■ DV and DV-MRT Facilitator ■ Volunteer at Saint Vincent de Paul • Judicial o District & Municipal Court Judges' Association (DMCJA) ■ Co -Chair of Legislative Committee ■ Member of the Public Outreach Committee ■ Member of Council on Independent Courts o Presenter at the Spring DMCJA Judicial Conference on racial disparities in imposition of legal financial obligations based on 2021 task for report on race in the criminal legal system • Looking Forward o Sections of SB 5476 that makes possession of a controlled substance a misdemeanor sunsets July 1, 2023 a o Updating jury summons processing Q o Continuing to develop Language Access Plan and interpreter services N o Change in law to provide for ability to pay hearings for infractions goes into effect in 2023 c o Potential for state funding for pretrial services that impact public safety (SCRAM, EHM, c GPS) w o Transition to new case management system in 2023 m o Expanding pretrial services, including text and email reminders for court dates E Councilmember Buckshnis observed the number of infractions and DUIs have gone down and asked if a that correlated with staffing issues in the police department. Judge Rivera assumed that was part of it as well as COVID. Ms. Maylor assumed it was related to staffing. Councilmember Buckshnis commented these issues do not miraculously go away. Judge Rivera said she did not presume that people were speeding less or driving less after consuming alcohol; there was likely a correlation with staffing. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Judge Rivera for answering her email and for including numbers in the presentation. Councilmember Paine commented it was great to hear the court was working on pretrial issues and helping to keep people out of jail as much as possible while still keeping community safety in mind. She asked about challenges associated with transitioning to the new case management system. Ms. Maylor answered courts have used the same case management system since 1983 which means the printer is as large as her first car and the system is a black screen with dots. It will be a huge change in how the judge looks at files and how papers are processed internally and there will be mechanisms for people to respond Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 63 7.2.a via the web, which is not available currently, recordings will be added to the website immediately, and people will be able to access documents faster. Some of the problems are due to the court still having paper files prior to going electronic during COVID and those need to be processed into the system before the system launches as well as getting everybody in the state trained. It will be exciting to have the ability for the public to access their documents and respond which hopefully will improve access to justice. Judge Rivera commented it will give judges better information by allowing access to documentation in other counties as well as allow the public to see the documentation at same time. It will help with transparency and uniformity across the courts to ensure they are all seeing the same thing. Councilmember Paine asked where backup drives are stored, assuming it was offsite. Ms. Maylor answered the Judicial Information System (JIS) is stored through the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC). Physical files on Laserfiche are stored through the City's IT department and she was unsure if there was a backup generator but assumed a governmental agency would have a secondary backup for electronic files. The data regarding criminal histories or DOL is backed up through Olympia and has multiple backups. Councilmember Paine recalled she was involved with the court at the time of the Cascadia earthquake and the court was able to access files as they were stored in Grant county. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to changes that occurred due to COVID and going virtual and asked r_ what would continue in the interim or become permanent. Judge Rivera answered hybrid appearances will continue. Certain statutes require people to appear in person such as an arraignment for a domestic violence offense or a DUI for example. The Supreme Court has modified some court rules to allow people to appear via Zoom. For example, she has had people appear while on their job at a construction site. Pre- COVID, people spent a lot of time finding childcare, taking time off work or finding transportation to — appear at a 30-second court hearing because their attorney was asking for a continuance. When there is a 3 something substantive that needs to be addressed in court, court rules give her the authority to set a G hearing over and require someone appear in person. The rules evolved very quickly, partially due to the c Supreme Court's response to the pandemic; they can pass rules and emergency orders, some of which are @ still in place and she anticipated would remain. It was a nice confluence that former Judge Coburn had c converted to a paperless system when the pandemic happened. During COVID, a lot was learned about a the obligations put on people who are already struggling to come to court and she doubted few courts Q would return to the old ways of doing things. N N Ln Councilmember L. Johnson commented for a lot of businesses, courts, city council, etc., there has been a c silver lining due to things learned from COVID and she was glad the court had the ability to keep some of w those in place. She remembered attending a kudos presentation by Probation Officer Omar Gamez and asked if that would be done again. She found that very thought provoking and educational, to hear from E people who were struggling, went through court system, where they were today and how proud they were of the work they had done. Judge Rivera answered there is not a kudos scheduled, it fell by the wayside during COVID. The court sees that regularly, people who come to court and want to share their a accomplishments. She agreed a mechanism should be developed to share that with members of the community. It gives people faith in the reliance of human beings to see how well people are doing. She offered to add that to the list of things to follow up on. Councilmember L. Johnson commented it puts a human face to it when people usually only hear about the worst. Council President Olson expressed appreciation for Judge Rivera and Ms. Maylor's flexibility when the court's presentation had to be rescheduled. She also appreciated their responsiveness to council questions. She referred to the numbers, commenting the community is looking for more feedback between the court, police and staff. She was thrilled the court is working directly with human services, remarking on the principle of public safety being everyone's issue and working on it together as a community. Judge Rivera said the court is happy to provide information. She agreed with the overlapping circles. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 64 7.2.a Councilmember Chen commented the City often receives complaints from the community about speeding, but the number of cases is very low. He referred to Ordinance 4261 which took effect on June 191, and asked if any cases had come to the court as a result. Judge Rivera answered they have not seen any yet. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO MOVE UP DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT DECISION TO OVERTURN ROE V. WADE TO COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEM 9.2. Councilmember L. Johnson pointed out there were many people in the audience to hear that item who did not need to sit through the OPMA training on the agenda. Moving the item up would be most respectful of the people who are present today. Councilmember Paine said she would support the amendment for the reasons stated. Although she enjoys OPMA training, she recognized there were people present specifically to listen and/or speak regarding the resolution before council so out of respect for the community, she supported moving that item to 9.2. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS c Mayor Nelson described the procedures for in -person audience comments. c L Q Jay Grant, Port of Edmonds Commissioner, liaison to Edmonds and Woodway, provided an update Q regarding the Port. He explained the Port is a separate government under Washington State law that N works to bring economic value to the community. The businesses in the Port do not pay property tax c because it is government land, instead the state charges a leasehold tax of approximately 13% of which c Edmonds receives approximately 30%. A portion of the sales tax generated by the Port goes to the City. w For example, when Jacobsen sells a $300,000 boat, about 4% or $12,000 goes to the City. The Port plans c to formally announce next week plans to build a new Port headquarters at a cost of approximately $8 E million. The taxes and fees the Port will pay the City total approximately $400,000. Once the new headquarters are built, the old building will be demolished and about 900 feet of the north side of the Port walk reconstructed (from the Port building to the fishing pier) and the former building location will be a a park. Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, thanked the city council for making an Edmonds kind of day with the 4' of July parade that honored the police, fire, and service organizations. The Pledge of Alliance includes the words, one nation under God with liberty and justice for all, but the United States is nearly in a civil war again and very divided. There are many important issues including the shooting in the Chicago parade. She found it very inappropriate for the council to be addressing women's rights and abortion. Fortunately, Washington is very pro women's rights and voices are being heard. Speaking for those who are pro -life, they are the council's constituents; the population of Edmonds is 43,580 and the council represents thousands of pro -life people. There are many big issues the council needs to work on. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 65 7.2.a Rebecca Anderson, Edmonds, said she spent the last several days with a heavy heart reflecting on the reproductive freedom resolution before council tonight, questioning whether taxpayer time and resources should be spent discussing a resolution that would endorse abortion so that Edmonds can claim to be an abortion sanctuary. She questioned whether Edmonds needed to be an abortion sanctuary. Washington State has very liberal abortion laws, in fact abortion was legal in Washington years before the Roe decision in 1973. During the state's last legislative session, a law was passed that no longer requires only doctors perform abortions and replaces "woman" with "person," so it is now legal in Washington for not just a woman but a person to get an abortion and it no longer has to be done by a doctor. People in the state have very few barriers to obtaining an abortion so why does Edmonds need to be an abortion sanctuary? She wondered whether anyone had stopped to think about those in the City who have been wounded physically, emotionally, mentally and spiritually by abortion. Almost a half century of abortion on demand in the United States has resulted in the death of 63.5 million children. Most people know at least one woman who has had an abortion, grandmothers, mothers, sisters, daughters, aunts, nieces and cousins in their families, and the loss they feel needs to be acknowledged and it would be callous to do otherwise as the City declares it a safe place that encourages women to have abortions. Ms. Anderson explained during an abortion, the life of a tiny human being ends. Not all women want to kill their unborn children, not all women who aborted their children are glad they did it, many women who have had abortions deal with regret and great loss. For those who have been directly or indirectly affected by abortion, she was sorry our culture failed them when they needed life affirming support and love for them and their unborn child. She consoled that they were not alone and prayed they had encountered the human mercy of God and if they had not, that they would and if they had started on that path, prayed they would continue. There are several beautiful ministries specifically for women who have experienced the hurt and sorrow of abortion including Project Rachel and it does not matter how long since a person's abortion. She quoted Mother Theresa when speaking at the 1982 Harvard commencement, "It is something unbelievable that today a mother herself murders her own child, afraid of having to feed one more child, afraid to educate one more child. A nation, people, family that allows that, that accepts that, they are the poorest of the poor." For the good of Edmonds, she urged the council to vote no on the resolution; the women of Edmonds deserve better. Denise Alvarado, Edmonds, said Edmonds is considering a very divisive resolution on a topic that has N already been handled at the state and federal levels. A nonpartisan council should not make such a Ln resolution; it is very inappropriate and does not reflect the views of many Edmonds citizens. Washington c State has had abortion rights in place even prior to 1973. Certain councilmember are fear mongering with w this resolution in what appears to be a kneejerk and incredibly partisan reaction. She did not want her taxes going to pay for any support for an already well -endowed Planned Parenthood. There is discussion E about protection or an escort for people going into the Planned Parenthood on 196t'', commenting she was not aware that there has even been a need for protection. There has recently been vandalism and threatening graffiti at the local pregnancy center that serves and supports women seeking help during and a after pregnancy. Planned Parenthood is outside the city limits as is the pregnancy center, if protection is given to Planned Parenthood, she asked that it also be given to the pregnancy center. She gave birth to and cared for a 26%2 week old baby, now a 26 year old, and knows what a pre -term infant looks like. Washington state currently allows abortion up to 24-28 weeks. About 97% of biologists recognize that life begins at conception; abortion is killing a genetically unique human being and 800,000 abortions happen per year in the United States. What the council is considering is very divisive and many do not support it. She wished the council would consider not approving the resolution. Janet Way, Shoreline, expressed her support for the proposed resolution because women's rights are human rights and reproductive rights are healthcare and women's healthcare needs to be supported. She appreciated the council's willingness to take up the resolution; it will benefit families, the economy and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 66 the human rights of women, children and men. She asked the council to vote yes to support access to reproductive choice, anticipating it mattered to the majority of voters. Maralyn Chase, Edmonds, commended the council for bringing this important issue that threatens democracy to a public policy discussion. The U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned the constitutional rights of young women, the right to control one's own body, but that is only the beginning. The U.S. Supreme Court has seriously challenged the First Amendment mandating the separation of church and state. This country was established, the first in the world, without an official religious doctrine, total separation of church and state and that is being challenged. She referred to hospital mergers, commenting 49% of hospitals in Washington are owned and managed by the Catholic church according to the ethical and religious directives of the Catholic healthcare services of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. When someone goes to a Catholic hospital, they are treated as if they are a Catholic and can only receive medical care that adheres to the Catholic religious directives. The religious directives governing hospital policies in half of Washington hospitals prohibits a full range of reproductive health services even if the woman's life is in danger, including ectopic pregnancies. These hospital directives prohibit death with dignity, a direct challenge to the constitutional rights of old people and also prohibit contraception, invitro fertilization, the only way some families can build their families, and care for LGBTQ patients and more. This is a serious public policy issue that fundamentally threatens democracy. Tony Shapiro, Edmonds, hoped the primary and overriding objective of this and any city council would be to focus on the challenges and issues affecting efficient management of the city. Edmonds City Council recently exemplified this objective when it denied permission for camping on public property and he applauded the council for addressing that issue before it became an overwhelming eyesore that is — difficult to stop once permitted on government property. Taking up issues outside the parameters of the council's responsibility is counterproductive to the efficient use of the council's time and detract from G constructive efforts to move the City in a positive direction. Tonight's discussion focuses on issues c outside the legal parameters this council has the authority to govern. Additionally, bringing this issue to @ the forefront effectively divides the citizenry in a manner that does no objective good for the overall c wellbeing of the community and was very aptly expressed in an opinion letter to the council by Paster a Barry this weekend. Morally, he is opposed to abortion and deeply believes that God does not look lightly a or kindly on the taking of innocent human life. Anyone arguing that abortion is not the taking of life is not N looking at the facts. The DNA of a fetus in a woman is not her DNA, the heartbeat within the woman is Ln not her heartbeat; she is the caretaker of the baby being formed within her womb and it is that woman's c and the subsequent mother's responsibility to care for and cherish that life. Abortion does neither of those w things and degrades all individuals involved, bringing a stain on womanhood, society and the country. m E Colleen Tracy, Edmonds, expressed support for the strongest resolution possible to protect and keep abortion access safe, legal and available. She had concerns with access to other health resources such as birth control, family planning and general healthcare that could also go down with the ship. Access is a imperative and vital. When she was out recently in support of pro -choice, a couple men shouted at her that it is still legal here, causing her to think, for how long? People who want women and other minorities to have fewer rights will never stop chipping away. She was saddened, sickened and felt very unsure for the country. She could not imagine the feelings of horror of the women in states with stone -age abortion laws now and in the near future. She requested the council protect women's rights and keep the City out of the stone -age with whatever is within their power. It is absolutely appropriate and important for the council to do this. Citizens cannot do this alone, they need allies near and far. It is not just a women's issue; young men will also pay for this lack of access. She has heard people in the room mention forced abortion, commenting no one is forcing anyone to have an abortion — get over it. The reality is some people need to have abortions; whatever the reason, it is their choice. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 67 7.2.a Carin Chase, Edmonds, expressed appreciation for the time the council would take to discuss the council's response to the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Speaking as one of the majority of women in the country and community that support protections afforded by Roe v. Wade, she was terribly angry and disappointed that for the first time in history, young women now have fewer rights than their mothers. She was angry and disappointed at the leadership shown by the country's highest court. Seeing the resolution that Councilmembers L. Johnson and Paine brought forward gave her faith in her elected officials. She was pleased the resolution would be discussed tonight and that the council has an opportunity to show the leadership the community needs. The community needs to know its leaders have their back and that they recognize rights are under attack and she urged everyone to support the resolution. She read from the resolution, "therefore, be it resolved that the City Council of Edmonds Washington that: The Edmonds City Council adopts this resolution to express its official position in support of amendments to the Washington State and United States Constitution to codify an individual's right to comprehensive, safe and accessible reproductive health care including abortion, contraception, gender affirming healthcare and marriage equality and urge our federal and state legislators to act in support of said rights. The Edmonds City Council also directs copies of this resolution be sent to Governor Inslee and representatives as a means of showing support of a constitutional amendment guaranteeing full access to abortion care services and increasing oversight of hospital mergers that have often interfered with reproductive health care services for all people. Edmonds is a supportive community and welcome people from other states coming to the area for full support of legal and safe reproductive support services. We direct that this policy by the city council that the police department will not commit any of their police services to the pursuit of any investigations related to those people seeking or providing abortion care." Patty Whitmarsh, expressed her opposition to the resolution entitled reproductive freedom. The Supreme Court of the United States is the final arbitrator and law of the land of the constitution. They G have corrected their error after nearly 50 years and the death of over 63 million unborn babies. c Councilmembers swore an oath to uphold the constitution and if they do not, they are in violation. @ Nowhere in the constitution does it say abortion is a right. Using a councilmembers' position to further c their opinion or ideological view to what the Supreme Court of the United States already determined is a outside their jurisdiction does not represent herself nor many Edmonds citizens. No city council should a ever deny an unborn baby its life or right to live. They can better serve the citizens of Edmonds by N immediately dropping this resolution. The country has been in a state of great division and moral decline; Ln pursuing this resolution regarding reproductive freedom will only further hostility and prevent the City c from being a place of nonpartisan, wholesome and quality living. On July 1, 2022, she sent each w councilmember an email stating her concerns. She thanked Council President Olson and Councilmembers Buckshnis and Tibbott for their prompt responses, noting she never heard from the other councilmembers. E She requested each Edmonds councilmember search their hearts, stay within the parameters in which they vowed an oath and seek godly wisdom, discernment, prudence and righteousness as they strive for peace and unity in this great City. Q Mark Ibsen, Edmonds, registered his opposition to the resolution regarding abortion freedom. This is primarily a state issue and should not be taken on by a small city and there are other issues to be concerned with. The impact of the resolution will be very small and will be seen as purely partisan and will divide the City. Unborn citizens are the most vulnerable and need our voices too. To his detractors, he said respect for the rights of human life knows no specific gender. He respectfully requested the council vote no to this resolution. Ruth Johnson Pirie, Edmonds, thanked the council for the many ways they serve the community and thanked citizens for what they do to make Edmonds a beautiful place to be. She expressed her opposition to the resolution. She has heard there needs to be respect for women who have chosen abortion; she has many friends who have done so and she understood their reasons due to choices she has made herself but Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 68 looking back there is also a choice for life that women must consider, the life of a human placed in their womb. There is a reason a human being was placed in a woman's womb to nurture and protect, each of us was one of those. In 1974 when abortion was legalized in Sweden, her mother was told she should have an abortion for medical reasons and chose not to; 28 years later, her mom had a massive heart attack and went into cardiac arrest and that daughter, her sister Rebecca, revived her. She is a math and science teacher who advocates for the poor and needy, an immigrant who now lives in France and works with orphaned children. She urged the city council to put the resolution aside, to consider life and consider men who also have a stake in this issue. If a man is required to pay for a child after it is born, they also have a choice when the child is in the womb. Tiffany Mecca, Edmonds, spoke in support of the resolution in opposition to the Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. She supported the strongest version, Resolution #1. She grew up knowing she had this protection if she needed it which told that her life, her dreams, who she was, and whether she wanted to be a parent mattered and that her existence independent of whether she would be a mother or bear a child mattered. She had that right when she went to bed Thursday night a week ago, but it was gone when she woke up Friday morning. This right has been chipped away for years at the federal level and in other states. She was terrified and angry when she learned about the Supreme Court's decision and it felt like an emergency. As a person who can get pregnant but doesn't want to, and a person who has a lot of privilege in that decision, she has always had the ability to access birth control and healthcare and had parents who understand the implications of being pregnant when you're not ready, her mom was 19 and has had frank conversations with her. She has a caring partner and access to birth control and healthcare, but not everybody has that. It is important for the city council to support women's rights at a local level. This is similar to other medical decisions that people cannot force her to make such as give blood or donate a kidney, or wear a mask, yet women will be forced to bear a child. Cassie Friedle, Edmonds, wearing the wings and blood red color depicted in a Handmaid's Tale, quoted c from the late and great Ruth Bader Ginsberg, "speak your mind even if your voice shakes." She recalled being 9 years old and in the 4' grade when she got her period; at 9 years old she was fertile and could c have had a child, a fetus that could have killed her as she carried something she could not comprehend, a carrying a death sentence. She questioned whether any councilmember would have stood by and watched a a handful of cells rupture their daughter's uterus and watch her die. She envisioned they would instead do N everything in their power to save that person. For those who think it's God plan and would have let her Ln die, they are lying to themselves; no one should be forced to be an incubator because it's God will. Yet c across the nation, women of all ages are being forced to carry a handful of cells that could kill them, w carrying a stillborn or ectopic pregnancy that will cause sepsis or a ruptured fallopian tube that will surely kill them. In North Carolina last week, patients with lupus and rheumatoid arthritis were denied life- E saving medication because they are of viable fertility age. Across the nation, doctors are being forced to break their sacred oath of doing no harm because of four men and one woman who swore to protect our constitution. For those who say it will never be outlawed in Washington and question why we are a fighting, something shouldn't happen to ourselves or our loved ones for us to care. Elected representatives are elected to follow their constituents' will; Edmonds demands protection of its daughters and securing reproductive rights. Shame on those who let their personal views or grudges overrule their duty as elected representatives. Councilmembers may not see the repercussions of their actions now or in five years, but she and other constituents will do everything in their power to unseat them and someday soon they were realize they were a coward but it will be too late. Megan Wolfe, Edmonds, expressed her gratitude to Councilmembers Paine and L. Johnson for proposing this resolution. At a time when it seems everyone in power is doing a lot of awful things, it is nice to know local officials have their backs. She supported a lot of what has been said about having rights taken away. She is now seen as a vessel to have babies, but she is much more than that as are all people who can become pregnant. They deserve equal, easy access to basic healthcare which is what Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 69 7.2.a abortion is. She struggles with the hypocrisy in this very emotional topic, people who claim they are pro - life but are not fighting for things that would actually save lives such as easier access to healthcare, better sex education at all ages, things that would prevent the need for abortion, but abortion should be easy to access as needed because it saves lives. As someone who has had a miscarriage, what came out of her body in no way resembled a human life. The fact that people are fighting for that sack of sells over a living, breathing, and contributing human being is difficult to understand. She strongly supports the resolution and thinks the local level is where there actually can be a very big impact because councilmembers are telling their constituents that they care about them and see them as whole human beings. Sofia Marie Castillo, Edmonds, a high school student, expressed support for the resolution because it supports her, her peers and many others. The formation of the United States was not religiously affiliated. Dawn Modsen, unincorporated Edmonds, said she planned to move into incorporated Edmonds and hoped to vote for the Edmonds council. As a person of baby -making age, with baby -making hormones, the past week has been an absolute nightmare. Although this is Washington, what the Supreme Court did with gun rights recently could also be done in Washington. She asked each councilmember to go on record stating their beliefs by voting for or against the resolution. Stephanie Smith, Edmonds, asked the council to support human rights with the strongest possible form of the resolution. Elected officials need to stand up for basic bodily autonomy and protecting citizens and residents' rights by, 1) ensuring City resources are not used to assist other jurisdictions in investigating and prosecuting individuals accessing basic healthcare, and 2) using the City's clout to ensure people's rights at the national and state level. Lisa Utter, Lynnwood, was glad the council was looking at this issue. She found it appalling that people were urging the council to focus on potholes instead of human rights. Councilmembers took an oath to protect the constitution and previously passed a resolution supporting human rights. She encouraged the council to pass the resolution. Gracelyn Shibayama, Edmonds, encouraged the council to vote yes on the resolution which is near and N dear to her heart. She has struggled over the past few weeks knowing her rights have stripped. Knowing Ln the City she lives in cares about her, her friends and her family to put this forward, to think about them, to c protect them is very important. The council has to pass this resolution for people her age and younger to w be an encouraging and welcoming City and to let young girls thrive and flourish. m E Denise Cooper said choosing to make abortion part of the discussion has placed a division in the community. She is pro -life, in support of the born and the unborn along with her heavenly father. What Councilmembers Paine and L. Johnson did by bringing abortion to the city council was a reckless move, a bullying fellow councilmembers into saying that they support something that possibly they don't. The answer to preventing babies from coming into the world is safe sex or sustaining from sex; killing babies is not birth control. Checking twice, ensuring you have taken your pills or are wearing protection so the woman does not get in a predicament where she has to choose to kill her unborn child. She was unsure why the Catholic church was brought up, but they are pro -life and offer child and family services, adoption, elder care and spiritual care. She asked the council to leave this as a federal decision and not a City statement because not all citizens agree and are not all pro -abortion, some of them choose life. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, encouraged the council to remove the special event permit item from tonight's consent agenda. If the council wants to review the special event permit code, he suggested initiating a policy -making process, tasking the planning board with it as a first step and not add more new problems to the City code. At a minimum, he requested the following terms be correctly defined in the City code: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 70 7.2.a easement, right-of-way, opened public street, opened public alley, unopened public street, and unopened public alley. He requested the council clearly identify who has maintenance responsibilities for all portions of both opened and unopened streets and alleys. He questioned where the idea came from that the City can issue a special event permit to use a right-of-way that the City has never used, plus issue such a permit without the fee owner's approval. The City has experienced a property owner taking legal action to establish adverse possession of a City easement. The City won that 1989 case because the property owner's construction and maintenance of a fence in the easement area was not considered adverse or hostile to the City's easement. The law allows the fee owner to use their land before the City opens a street or alley so the construction and maintenance of the fence was not adverse or hostile to the City's easement. Mr. Reidy continued, however, if the City brings in a third party and allows permits to be issued to third parties for use of unopened streets and alleys, the situation changes. If the City does so, a property owner's use of their property may now become adverse or hostile to the City's right-of-way. If the council decides to go forward, he strongly recommended all permit applications to make use of the unopened streets and alleys require the signed approval of the fee owner; approval by both parties with legal rights to the property might protect the City from opening the door to adverse or hostile use of a City easement by the fee owner. The fee owner should be involved in the permit process if someone wants to use part of an opened street or alley that the fee owner is required to maintain. He urged the council to take time to get this right, to allow property owners with land subject to an unused right-of-way or with maintenance responsibilities an opportunity to be heard on this important topic starting at the planning board level. Bill McClain, Shoreline, recalled fishing in the 1980s and bagging seven silvers, one of which the hook — 0 almost went through the fish's eye. Imagine a hook going through the eye and being dragged into a boat. He commented on the pain inflicted by boiling crab. In an abortion of the unborn, the abortionist crushes G the baby's skull or cuts off the arms and legs while it is alive and struggling, fighting against the c abortionist's actions. He acknowledged having an unplanned child was hard on a woman, but the mother @ can have the child and it can be adopted. The torture that the unborn experience during an abortion is c unimaginable. Slavery was abolished in the 1800s in spite of the inconvenience to the slave masters, the a plantation owners as well as to the country; it cost 500,000 lives to put an end to slavery. The overriding a reason was because slaves were people. The unborn are people too and need protection under the law. N N Ln Mary Jennings, unincorporated Edmonds, said she was 15 when she was taken advantage of and c became a very young mother. She was told to abort, that she would never graduate from high school and w not to bring an unwanted child into the world. She had her daughter; her daughter is now 49 years old, a successful executive with Nordstrom. She herself graduated from high school in the top percentile and E went on to Fresno State University and is a retired law enforcement officer, spending 25 years as a undercover investigator for the State of California. Edmonds is a great place to retire and be closer to her daughter. She is thankful she had her child regardless of what people said and raised her as a single mom a until she turned 16. She is extremely pro -life and her daughter texted her recently thanking her for giving birth to her. Kristen Johnson said this is an incredibly large subject and cannot be solved in an hour or two. Not only have children been allowed to die, but women have also suffered due to what they did. She never had to do that, she brought forth her children and her youngest daughter commanded her heart to beat in the mighty name that we never hear about or dare to discuss because it is forbidden in society. She has seen the greatness of his power in so many ways for many decades. She encouraged everyone to consider that they are a living miracle, put together so fantastically but their offspring are being killed, people who could become doctors, etc. as she has seen in her incredibly smart grandchildren. At 88 years old, she is experiencing difficulty with her knees. She referenced the story relayed by Ruth Johnson Pirie about her daughter reviving her, commenting she was here tonight as a mighty testimony. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 71 7.2.a Heather Damron, Edmonds, said the stripping of rights does not stop here. Washington is one bad election away from what is happening federally happening in Washington. Church and state must be kept separate, legislators must be encouraged to codify Roe at the state level as soon as possible. She urged the council to vote yes to approve the most strongly worded resolution possible. Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments. Dawn Siewert, Director, Edmonds Lutheran Learning Center, was proud Edmonds was taking up the Roe v. Wade discussion. She spoke in favor of the approval of an update to Edmonds City Code to include Impact Fee Waiver for Early Learning Facilities. This came about as a result of her center which has been trying to change the use of the fireside room to be an educational center for children. The fee to change the use for childcare is about $36/square foot. At a time when childcare is so important to so many families, having this space or allowing a reduction in the fee for other centers would allow many more childcare spaces to open up. She urged the council to approve the fee waiver amendment. The information in the Child Care Collaborative Task Force report attachments is from November 2019 so it can be multiplied by COVID. She commended the hard work that childcare teachers, directors, and staff have done over the last two years during the pandemic, in -person with children and taking on an immeasurable amount of stress and keeping things as normal as possible for the children, some of whom have only been alive during COVID. She has 15 kids now that only know COVID, seeing parent and others wearing masks. Opening more childcare spaces as families return to work is important and she urged the council to vote yes on the fee waiver. Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, said Britain's restrictions and fees for cutting pine trees motivated the 3 Declaration of Independence on July 7, 1776. Property rights continue to motivate immigration to the G U.S. Her parents were 5 years old when 400 Nazis occupied their tiny island in Norway, doubling their - population. For five years Nazis kicked families out of their homes in the dark of night, moved in and took their food supplies. When supplies ran out, Nazis moved to the next home. Every home housed c either two families or Nazis who took what they wanted, making families buy back their own supplies, a their own property. In 1965 her parents immigrated to Seattle with their children and were proud to Q become naturalized when they were sworn in as American citizens. Their father employed 100s, served N on museum, charity and hospital boards, volunteered thousands of hours at Ballard Food Bank, Nordic Ln Heritage Museum and supported those in need, paying for drug and alcohol addicted employees' sobriety. c Her mom supported him and their five children in everything, inspiring them to give what's needed and w expect nothing in return. In 2017 they purchased 1.2 acres in Edmonds to downsize and live beside each other. Inexperienced, they first got the go-ahead from the geotech and planning department but then got E the runaround. After five years, they are close to a permit for division. Shockingly 82 years after the terrifying Nazi occupation, it is happening to them again in the USA. Q Ms. Ferkingstad continued, they cannot live on the property until they pay Edmonds for their own trees. Edmonds has permanently seized rights to all trees on their property without just compensation. Permits for tree removal for three homes are denied until $107,000 is received in tree fees in addition to the likely $100,000 in permits and Edmonds' permanent seizure of all rights to trees is recorded on property titles at the county. Their Ukrainian neighbors have to pay $64,000 in tree fees to build a home for their parents, a south Asian family cannot build homes without paying hundreds of thousands, and retired couples cannot afford to divide and sell half their property for retirement. Immigrant families and senior citizens are forced to compensate for tree canopy loss of 100 years of development. Edmonds' seizures and excessive fees restricting the use of vacant properties has decreased values and owners' equity. They are denied constitutional protections that all citizens benefit from. She asked whether the council would honor the pledge they made at all meetings, liberty and justice for all and asked whether all citizens will be free to live peacefully and productively without interference from the government. She asked for this to be Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 72 7.2.a placed on next week's agenda, immediately rescind the illegal tree ordinance and prioritize their constitutional rights. Cynthia Sjoblom, Edmonds, said people from Lynnwood and Shoreline speaking tonight do not have a say in Edmonds' politics. She was appalled by a remark by an audience member to "get over it." The resolution is an overreach and overrides the state's authority. The state of Washington has already decided to keep women's rights in place so fear -mongers saying people will be unable to get birth control, she suggested they get over it because they will be able to get birth control. To those who say, my body my choice, they are the same people, along with the government, telling unvaccinated people what to do with their bodies, shaming people for not being vaccinated or not wearing a mask. When it comes to my body my choice, they only believe it when it is convenient for them. She recalled Councilmember L. Johnson telling others to get vaccinated. There are two sides to every story; many women regret their abortions. In an article by the Daily Caller, former state lawmaker Alveda King, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s niece and media personality Corinne Kimble spoke about their abortion stories and how the experience changed their lives. "Abortion is a civil wrong. Life is a civil right" said Alveda King. King stated her OB/GYN coerced into getting her first abortion and recommended she obtain her second one due to struggles in her marriage and the age of her first child and referred her to Planned Parenthood with the advice not to talk to her family or church about women's health matters and that Planned Parenthood would be a friend to talk to. King had two abortions and an abortion -related miscarriage before she began to look more closely into the issue, before she experienced the reality of the sanctity of life. "If I told my grandfather he would have helped me choose life. He convinced my mother not to let me in 1950." Corinne Kimball, a pro -life advocate and media personality, was pressured by her family and boyfriend who said their lives would be changed and it would affect their careers. She reported being tugged in every direction and crying hysterically because she could not think about going through with an abortion. She wished Planned Parenthood had been honest with her about the pain, guilt and especially options. She said they weren't trying to help her but pushing abortions and no information was given about adoption. She had expected Planned Parenthood to be a safe place for women. She urged the council not to pass the resolution. Mary Kimball, Edmonds, a queer woman, was heartened to see so many pride flags when she a experienced the Edmonds 4t'' of July parade for the first time yesterday. She was heartened by the actions a of Council President Olson and Councilmembers L. Johnson and Paine to include all people who may N need access to reproductive rights and reproductive health care. She recognized it was incredibly Ln unusually for a city council to take up a matter that does not practically impact the City. As others noted, c there are no places in Edmonds that perform abortions. These are unprecedented times, Roe v. Wade has w been overturned and is no longer law and access to comprehensive reproductive care and other forms of healthcare including those affecting the LGBTQA+ community are under threat. She urged the council to E vote yes on either of the resolutions; she liked the first one but both are fantastic. These are unprecedented times that demand unusual comprehensive solutions to protect democracy and civil rights. Q Charlie Ann Lu, Edmonds, thanked the council for their willingness to consider the resolution on abortion and reproductive rights. While she considered herself pro -choice, she is also pro -life; a human live that begins at viability, not at conception. Not all people believe fertilized eggs are babies and since some cited science, as a published scientist, in the strictest biological definition, an embryo is actually a parasite, unable to sustain itself without a host. Women as a whole should not be forced, or to use some others' words, enslaved to become a host to a parasite. Many reference women who regret their abortion, but looking at science, a landmark study at UCFF recently showed 95% of women do not regret their decision and the overwhelming majority had positive feelings or none at all. She had a lifesaving abortion in her 20s and the only trauma she ever experienced is from people who accused her of murder. Despite that trauma, she has become very open with her story and because of that transparency, she has spent the past 25 years advising others on their reproductive decisions. While she does not always agree with every case in which a person chooses an abortion, she believes that every individual must have the freedom to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 73 7.2.a control their own reproductive autonomy and neither she nor the government should impose their own views on other people's medical decisions. Therefore, she supported the council's resolution on abortion and reproductive rights in its strongest form. This is especially important in the context of Edmonds' commitment to equity since restrictive reproductive choices disproportionately harm people of color and those who are economically disadvantaged. Edmonds is small but mighty and this resolution can signal to the governor, senators, representatives that the City is in strong support of women, people of color and other who are economically disadvantaged. She urged the council to vote yes. Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, continued her comments previously provided to council on the most recent version of the PROS Plan. The current council is not able to make commitments to improvements in the next round of the PROS Plan and she wanted a durable public record of the feedback the council received and disregarded. Page 17, the outcome of the community tabling events in SR-99 is only identified by a few sentences on that page and includes no separate write-up in appendix D. This is the only outreach for which this is the case. If the City wants to build relationships with underserved communities, the City needs to do a better job of documenting the feedback received from the community and directly connect it to policy, CFP/CIP, and new inserted action plan. She asked that a separate write-up from the feedback received from the tabling events be included. Figure 5 Map 1, the City erroneously counts land owned by the PUD in the SR-99 area as a special use park. She referred to the email provided to council on June 26t' from the PUD identifying there is no access or agreement between the City and the PUD for areas south of the park and that these locations are signed no trespassing. She requested all figures and tables be revised to remove this area from depictions and calculations of City services. Page 74-76, open space, greater attention should be paid to equity and access as well as the revised definition of open space to focus on restoration of forest land and wetlands that can be or are located in all areas of the City. If the — City is going to change the definition of open space to better accommodate acquisition of the marsh, then 3 that concept of restoration and not just citing open space where natural features exist needs to be applied G throughout the City including underserved areas. c Ms. Seitz continued, additionally, the City included a walkability analysis to open space within the maps c but provides no text analysis of the accessibility gap within the open space section. She requested a text a analysis of the location of significant access gaps be included. Page 75, wetlands, the Unocal property a identified in the wetland section is primarily upland and contaminated fill pad and provides very limited N potential for direct wetland restoration, only the stormwater pond and ditch. Many other properties within Ln the City provide a greater ability to directly provide wetland habitat. She requested the Unocal property c be eliminated from the wetland section or discussion expanded to include any property within the City w that would provide equivalent proportions of land that could be restored to wetlands. This would include but is not limited to the entire area north of the marsh west of SR-104 and south of Dayton as well as E properties along Lake Ballinger. Next week she will start with Chapter 6. She referred to the Supreme Court's decision that this is not a federal issue, and said it is entirely appropriate for the council to take up the matter and provide the City's point of view to the state. There is no such thing as an unborn citizen; a there is birthright citizenship in this country. She absolutely supported bodily autonomy. Susan Hughes, Edmonds, referred to a post in My Edmonds News by Councilmembers Paine and Councilmember L. Johnson that they drafted a resolution in support of abortion. Now they want the Edmonds City Council to adopt it. They did not state that large parts of the resolution are copied from Resolution 3054 submitted by Marxist Seattle City Councilwoman Kshama Sawant who is openly Marxist and has been noted as such on CNN, New York Times, Seattle Times, etc. Councilmembers Paine and L. Johnson distributed the resolution on local news media before disclosing it to their fellow councilmembers. She recalled Councilwoman Sawant brought protestors to then Mayor Durkan's home and unlocked Seattle city hall for protestors and questioned whether Edmonds had to look forward to. Some people who live, work or visit Edmonds support the United States Supreme Court decision. The constitution does not confer a right to abortion and returns the authority to regulate abortion to the people Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 74 7.2.a and their elected representatives. People of both viewpoints are free to have their own opinion and citizens of Edmonds all deserve representation by Edmonds City Council. The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest tribunal in the nation for all cases and controversies arising under the constitution or the laws of the United States. As a final arbitrator of the law, the court is charged with ensuring American people the promise of equal justice under law and thereby also function as guardian and interpreter of the constitution. Edmonds councilmembers have taken an oath of office to support the constitution and laws of the United States. The city council code of ethics states the chief function of local government at all times is to serve the best interest of all the people. Edmonds City Council is foisting opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which exposed citizens to choose between staying silent out of fear or risking harm if they publicly oppose the resolution. Pro -choice and pro -life people deserve to be safe and to feel invited in the community. This resolution should not be part of Edmonds City government and Councilmembers Paine and L. Johnson should be censured for violating their oath of office, the code of ethics, and the code of conduct. 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING MARCH QUARTERLY FINANCE REPORT 8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO PULL ITEM 8.7, ORDINANCE REPEALING OR AMENDING CERTAIN CHAPTERS OF ECC TITLE 4 LICENSES AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER RELATED TO SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS, AND PUT IT ON THE AGENDA AS ITEM 9.3. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as Q follows: N N Ln 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 27, 2022 0 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2022 w c m 3. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE E PAYMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS Q 5. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE 6. EDMONDS CITIZENS' TREE BOARD APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION 8. RESOLUTION ADDING SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT FEES TO THE CITY'S FEE SCHEDULE 9. PLN2022-0009 REZONE 9516 & 9530 EDMONDS WAY 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS APPROVE UPDATE TO EDMONDS CITY CODE CHAPTER 3.36 TO INCLUDE IMPACT FEE WAIVERS FOR EARLY LEARNING FACILITIES Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 75 7.2.a Acting Public Works Director Rob English introduced Engineering Program Manager Jeanie McConnell. He reviewed: • Impact Fee Waiver o ECC 3.36 — regulates Street and Parks Impact fees o ECC 3.36.040 — provides partial exemption for low-income housing units o In 2018, the state legislature created a Child Care Collaborative Task Force to incentivize employer -supported childcare as well as improve childcare access and affordability. Their 2019 report included many recommendations, one of which was to partner with entities and jurisdictions to eliminate local construction impact fees. o July 2021 — RCW 82.02.060 was amended to also allow exemptions for early learning facilities Proposed code update to allow for partial exemption of street and park impact fees 0 80% exemption with remaining 20% paid at building permit issuance o Covenant to be recorded ■ 25% or more of children and families qualify for state subsidized child care ■ Annual report and supporting documentation to be submitted to the City ■ Exempted portion of fees to be paid for failure to comply with covenant ■ Full fees required for property conversation Staff recommends the change Councilmember K. Johnson advised the Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed this proposal and supports staff s recommendation. It was brought to council due to the code change. The committee felt it would be an asset to childcare and learning facilities in the City. The fees that will be waived are not significant for the City and can be recovered if the conditions are not met. Council President Olson thanked staff for the complete packet. She pointed out the permit system will be used to track receipt of the annual reports to ensure compliance. Councilmember Paine appreciated this coming to city council. She thanked former Student a Representative Brook Roberts for bringing this forward after being contacted by Ms. Siewert. It was her N understanding that child care facility would be next to the Housing Hope facility near the Lutheran c Church. Ms. McConnell advised Ms. Siewert operates a business within the Edmonds Lutheran Church c which is adjacent to the future Housing Hope location. Councilmember Paine expressed support for the w proposed change as the apartments at Housing Hope will be large enough for families so it will be m important to have access to childcare nearby. As a parent who paid for childcare, she realized it was E expensive. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked staff for the complete packet. a COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 3.36.040 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE TO ADD A PARTIAL IMPACT FEE EXEMPTION FOR EARLY LEARNING FACILITIES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Nelson declared a recess from 9:09 — 9:15 p.m. 2. DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT DECISION TO OVERTURN ROE V. WADE Council President Olson said before the council discusses the merits of one resolution over the other, she wanted it to be clear that the council wanted to make a statement on this issue. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 76 COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO ABSTAIN FROM MAKING A STATEMENT AS A CITY COUNCIL. Council President Olson said she did not come to the role as a city councilmember to be a politician, she came to serve her community in a nonpartisan role. Whenever the council acts, they should like the process regardless of the subject matter. She felt this process does not work and she did not want the council to weigh in on national issues. The council position is promoted as a part-time job and in her experience, being both an activist and doing the City's business makes it a full time job plus. She was not willing to stop doing the work of the City to be an activists in this role. She was not saying she or anyone else should be silent on this matter, but she shouldn't be speaking on behalf of the community on this matter, she preferred not to and she preferred not to be put in the position of doing so. If this becomes a resolution and the body does not accept her proposal, she will vote on the resolution because she has already taken a stand on this issue. However, nonpartisanship is also part of the council's charter. Council President Olson continued, as council president, she attends a monthly meeting with all the other south Snohomish County city council presidents and Edmonds is the only city taking up this action. All the others are saying their city is choosing not to get involved due to their nonpartisan charter. A councilmember's role is determining what is best for Edmonds. Those who think choice is important, as a lot of people do, would say this is something they have to do. She has looked at this issue very exhaustively this week and last and feels strongly that these rights are secure in Washington State and that a further statement in Edmonds is not needed because the situation will be the same regardless of whether a statement is made or not. Councilmember Paine said she was not in favor of doing nothing. As one of the authors of the resolution, v she pointed out with the ruling of the Supreme Court, everything has changed. Decades of case law ,_ regarding privacy and access to medical care have been lost with this ruling. The decision has been ° delegated to the states and she hoped the council would stand up and send the resolution to state c representatives and the Governor to add reproductive care to the state constitution. The council has heard n stories tonight and via email, lived experiences that should not be ignored or treated lightly. She believes a in choice and as a parent she chose to have her daughters, but that is not everyone's path. This is a good N vote for the city council to take, to stand up for the people who lost their rights a week and a half ago ,N when the country went backwards. She will not support the motion to do nothing. 2 0 w Councilmember L. Johnson said she was also not in favor of doing nothing. She did not accept the argument that the council should not speak out because this is a divisive issue. It should not be divisive to protect freedom, equality, human health and human rights. To those who say this a partisan issue, she asked if they were saying one party did not support religious freedom, equality and human rights. She respects the rights of others to their personal religious beliefs as it pertains to their individual choice. This Q resolution is about supporting, protecting, codifying individual choice and human rights. She was not here to protect people's feelings or desires to control the rights and choices of others. She was here to protect the right to choice, bodily autonomy and freedom which comes in many forms. This is unprecedented, many have had their rights threatened and stripped away and for that reason she cannot do nothing. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Council President Olson for putting together the agenda packet so everyone can review it. As the longest serving councilmember, she recognized this was an extremely emotional topic and tonight's public comments on both sides of the issue may have been the longest. It is an emotional issue, church versus state. She is a very religious person and carries a rosary in her purse. The council has looked at state issues before and provided opinions, approximately 8-10 times in the past 12 years. From a partisan standpoint, this issue is very divisive and the country is extremely divided. She was still processing whether the council should say something and further the division. She used to teach self-defense for the Portland Police and often heard women talk about incest, abuse, rape, date rape, etc. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 77 7.2.a The onus is on women and nothing happens to the man even though it takes two. She hears both sides and recognizes it is a difficult issue to process. She thanked everyone who has contacted her, acknowledging some people are very angry. She anticipated the council would be thoughtful in their decision. Councilmember Chen thanked the community for speaking up and writing to the council to let them know where they stand. This is a very important issue and people are very passionate about it. This was a national issue and has become a local issue as abortion rights and choice are now up to the state. He said choice regarding abortion is the freedom to choose, it is not a forced abortion. He was born and raised in China in the 70s and his relatives went through forced abortion due to the one child policy. In Washington there is choice, women have the freedom to choose. The founding fathers founded this country based on the concept of religious freedom. Forced abortion is wrong, the freedom to choose is a way of life that we pursue and treasure. He immigrated as a first generation to the U.S. with the idea of pursuing freedom. For that reason, the council needs to send a message to the state lawmakers that they want freedom. Councilmember K. Johnson expressed support for the motion to take no action. The Supreme Court is the determinant of the constitution; they made a ruling and defer it to the states for further action. That upset a lot of people as illustrated by many who spoke tonight, but others said this is not the role for local government, it is up to the state to decide. No other cities in south Snohomish County are considering this action. This is a very divisive issue and it is up to a person's personal belief to take action and they have avenues to contact their state legislators and the governor. This is not an appropriate role for the City of Edmonds and as a representative government, she was unsure how councilmembers could promote their own agendas without taking into account there are over 40,000 people in the City and not all are fully represented by this decision. This is a divisive issue and not everyone agrees so councilmembers cannot take a position. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES, COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO, AND COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO Q ACCEPT A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF ACCESS TO A FULL RANGE OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INCLUDING ABORTION SERVICES AND N URGING FEDERAL AND STATE ELECTED OFFICIALS TO CODIFY THESE RIGHTS. c 0 Councilmember L. Johnson clarified the motion was to approve the resolution that was handed out. This w updated resolution is a combination of two resolutions in the packet. She appreciated the improvements that came with the opportunity to update the resolution, specifically adding more information about E Washington State and what Washington has done to -date. She and Councilmember Paine undertook this resolution and wording is borrowed from five cities, Minneapolis, San Diego, Morro Bay, Pasadena as a well as the State of Washington Governor's office. Many of the statistics and additional wording come from the American Psychological Association, the ACLU and the Rabbinical Assembly. Instead of reinventing the wheel, they did their research and used language from other places along with the original language that they and other councilmembers provided. She was proud of the resolution. The reason for the resolution is the U.S. is a country founded on the principle of separation of church and state. Councilmember L. Johnson continued, last week 168 million people who may become pregnant had the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and privacy stripped away; a floodgate was opened allowing individual bodily autonomy and reproductive choice to be dictated by others' religious beliefs. If a constitutional right that was long established by law can be stripped away, what's next, the right to use contraception, marriage equality, protection from criminalizing the private conduct of LGBTQ persons?. In 2007, the council unanimously resolved that it is their utmost responsibility to uphold the rights and freedoms of the families and individuals they represent and that they believe as elected representatives of Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 78 7.2.a the people of Edmonds, they have a special responsibility to speak out against discrimination against any residents and chose to be a leader in protecting human rights, equity, public safety and social wellbeing. Councilmember L. Johnson continued, after Friday's decision, many in the community were terrified about their and their family members, friends and neighbors' safety and wellbeing. Now more than ever as stated in the Safe City Resolution, the council, as elected representatives of the people of Edmonds, have a special responsibility to speak out against discrimination against any residents and choose to be leaders by protecting human rights, equity, public safety and social wellbeing. The council owes it to those who are terrified about the loss of human rights to use their voice to call upon the state and federal government to codify these rights into the Washington State and United States Constitutions so that going forward the right to bodily autonomy and reproductive freedom is protected at the highest level and not threatened in the future. In this resolution, the council stands by those commitments and uses its collective voice to advocate for the restoration and preservation of reproductive freedom and choice. Councilmember Paine spoke in favor of the resolution, a resolution that directly impacts the most intimate decision a family makes, conversations that happen at the kitchen tables, on the phone, everywhere, conversations that need to be held with medical providers and others that a person trusts. These are not discussions for legislators who tell people they no longer have a choice. The Supreme Court's ruling has undone the ability for people to seek clinical care because Casey v. Planned Parenthood was taken away. Roe v. Wade, access to safe, legal abortion care was taken away overnight. Not having the ability to get good counsel will put everyone at risk. There have been discussions about a national law outlawing abortion as soon as the next election. The Supreme Court has been packed with people who do not believe in choice. Having the state and federal constitutions recognize reproductive rights and freedom is absolutely essential so people continue to have access to clinical care for reproductive services and it is nobody else's business. Councilmember Paine continued, what is proposed is not outrageous or out of line with what existed two weeks ago. The council has heard from a lot of people tonight and have received an equal amount or more c emails on this topic. It has been overwhelmingly representative of the state's positions of 80/20 or a sometimes 90/10 in favor of preserving women's right to access to care. She requested the council a support the resolution. She noted domestic violence is an issue, abuse in the family dynamic is part of N what needs to be discussed. Someone with a coercive, violent partner does not have a choice. She wanted Ln to preserve these rights for individuals and families in the future. c w COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AMEND TO REMOVE SECTION 4 WHICH ENGAGES THE EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT IN PURSUIT OF INVESTIGATIONS RELATING TO PEOPLE SEEKING OR t PROVIDING ABORTION, FINDING THAT OVERREACH. Q Councilmember Buckshnis commented this is a very difficult topic, she was old enough to know what happens; at 13 she was a hotel maid and saw what happens when someone tries to self -abort and it wasn't pretty. She has prayed a lot on this, and it is important to understand the implications of what happened and why it is important for the council to make a statement at the city level to state legislators. She summarized Section 4 was too overreaching. Councilmember L. Johnson said this section is important; the State of Washington has already set the groundwork for this by issuing something similar to the Washington State Patrol (WSP). Edmonds has its own police department and it is appropriate to make such a statement regarding the City of Edmonds police department and not committing services in pursuit of any investigations related to people who are seeking or providing abortion care or reproductive health care services and it is not a public safety priority for the Edmonds community. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 79 7.2.a Councilmember Paine pointed out Governor Inslee issued a directive to the WSP, but each community has their own police department and she did not believe this was not overreach or inappropriate to make a policy that this was the lowest priority in the police department. She encouraged councilmembers to support the declaration that pursuit of people coming to the community seeking reproductive health care services, abortion services or those investigations because that is not a public safety issue for Edmonds. Council President Olson said that was a section she wanted to rewrite as it appeared to order or direct the police department which is more of an administration issue. The section she included in one of her versions of the resolution stated the Edmonds City Council and Edmonds Police Department recognize and agree to the restrictions in RCW 9.02.100 prohibiting local law enforcement from penalizing, prosecuting or taking any adverse action against patients exercising their reproductive rights. Instead of the council ordering the police department, it would state the council and Edmonds Police Department support what is already state law. She liked the tone of that language better and suggested voting no on this amendment with a subsequent motion to add the alternative language. Councilmember Chen referred to section 4, commenting it was important to state the police department will not engage in criminalizing anyone seeking abortion services, but he wanted to ensure the language was clear about those seeking abortion services versus other crimes. He feared people would use this clause as a shelter for other wrongdoing. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said one option would be to reference state laws that protect those rights in RCW 9.02, but simply referencing that chapter does not say much. He was unsure if the drafters of section 4 intended for it to go above and beyond what the state is protecting in RCW 9.02. The council does not need to tell the police to protect a right that state law already protects; RCW 9.02.100 states, "The state may not deny or interfere with a pregnant individual's right to choose to have an abortion prior to viability of the fetus or to protect the pregnant individual's life or health." The only possible ambiguity he saw was state law protects up to viability and also to protect the pregnant individual's life or health; the language in section 4 is not limited in that way, but could easily be amended to apply that limitation. He was unsure that would achieve the drafters' intent. Councilmember L. Johnson appreciated Council President Olson bringing up the Governor's directive 22- a 12, a directive to the WSP. She supported applying the wording in that directive to the City of Edmonds a Police Department. N N Ln Councilmember Paine also supported the inclusion of the Governor's directive and the language in RCW c 9.02 which was recently revised by the legislature to make abortion care access a lot broader. w c Council President Olson asked if the Governor's directive applied to local law enforcement. Mr. Taraday E answered it does not. One of the paragraphs in the June 30t' press release from the Governor's office � states, "though the governor does not have jurisdiction over local law enforcement agencies, state law prohibits anyone including all state and local enforcement from penalizing, prosecuting or taking any a adverse action against patients exercising their reproductive rights." The Governor's press release expressly states it does not have jurisdiction over local law enforcement agencies. Council President Olson pointed out the press release also states that state law prohibits penalizing, prosecuting or taking any adverse action against patients exercising their reproductive rights. She did not understand how both could be true. Mr. Taraday said the question it raises is if state law already prohibits anyone including all state and local enforcement from penalizing, prosecuting or taking any adverse action against patients exercising their reproductive rights, the purpose of the Governor's directive is not clear. The directive describes what it does but he was unsure whether it was a real world impact or a symbolic thing. For example, the press release states, "The order directs the WSP to decline cooperation with most subpoenas, search warrants or court orders from states with laws that ban or significantly restrict abortion access. WSP must review and process such requests in conjunction with the Office of the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 80 7.2.a Attorney General and Governor's general counsel." Mr. Taraday suggested if the council wanted to do something similar to the Governor's order, they more closely copy the language used in the Governor's order in the way that it references search warrants or court orders from states with laws that ban or significantly restrict abortion access as that is the meat of the Governor's order. That may be what was intended by section 4, but section 4 does not exactly say that and he did not want to presume the authors' intent. As one of authors of section 4, Councilmember L. Johnson said what the Governor wrote does a much better job of encapsulating the intent. Councilmember K. Johnson raised a point of order, advising Councilmember L. Johnson had already spoken twice on this subject. Councilmember L. Johnson agreed she had spoken twice and was simply clarifying the intent of the authors. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO EXTEND TO 10:15. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. City Clerk Scott Passey restated the motion TO STRIKE SECTION 4. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO TAKE THE VERBIAGE IN THE GOVERNOR'S DIRECTIVE 22-12 THAT APPLIES TO THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL AND ADOPT IT TO APPLY TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT WHICH INCLUDES THE RCW THAT WAS CITED WITHIN THE DIRECTIVE. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE, L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Because the last amendment the council voted on was not a full insertion of language, Mr. Taraday asked a if the intent was for the resolution to come back on consent next week so he could draft language that was N in the spirit of the motion for the council's review prior to a final vote. If not, more work would be Ln necessary to ensure he got the language right. c w Council President Olson pointed out next week is committee night and asked if it would be possible to work on the wording now. Mr. Taraday said he was trying to capture the spirit of the discussion as well as E be mindful that the council was a legislative body speaking to a police department; in the Governor's situation, it is the executive branch speaking to its own law enforcement agency. For that reason he suggested the following, "With the passage of this resolution, the Edmonds City Council requests the City a of Edmonds Police Department to decline cooperation with most subpoenas, search warrants or court orders from states with laws that ban or significantly restrict abortion access." Councilmember L. Johnson said the Governor's directive states, refrain from providing any cooperation or assistance whatsoever to any out of state law enforcement agency, public entity or private party if the matter concerns abortion -related conduct or other reproductive health and establish a process in conjunction. Mr. Taraday observed she was looking at the actual directive, he was looking at the press release which is a shorthand version of the directive. Councilmember L. Johnson said the actual directive does a thorough job of encapsulating the intent of the original section 4. Her motion was to take the language from the directive and adopt it for the City of Edmonds. Mr. Taraday asked if it would work to reference directive 22-12 and add that the council requests the Edmonds Police Department follow the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 81 7.2.a directions provided in the Directive of the Governor 22-12. Councilmember L. Johnson said that would be acceptable to her, but was unsure about the rest of the council. Council President Olson agreed that would be simpler and better. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, asking about parliamentary procedure since the council already voted. Mr. Taraday suggested another motion to amend to tighten up the spirit of what was previously voted on by expressly referencing 22-12 which may be more consistent with Councilmember L. Johnson's motion. Councilmember L. Johnson clarified she referenced the directive, not the press release and the council voted on the directive, not the press release. Her motion was to have the directive worded to apply to the City of Edmonds Police Department. Mr. Taraday asked if her request was for the mayor to issue a directive to the police department. If he directly translated the directive, that's what it would be. Councilmember L. Johnson appreciated that Mr. Taraday was asking for clarity; that would be acceptable to her, but the council would need to vote on it. As Councilmember L. Johnson began to make a motion, Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, commenting this would be a reconsideration as the content of what the council voted on was being changed. Mr. Taraday agreed it could be characterized as a reconsideration if someone on the prevailing side wanted to do that. At the end of the day, he was not sure what the council just voted on, which was why he brought this up. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING SECTION 4 OF THIS RESOLUTION. WITH THE V PASSAGE OF THIS RESOLUTION, THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS THE EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT REFRAIN FROM PROVIDING ANY COOPERATION OR G ASSISTANCE WHATSOEVER TO ANY OUT OF STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, > PUBLIC ENTITY OR PRIVATE PARTY IF THE MATTER CONCERNS ABORTION RELATED o CONDUCT OR OTHER REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICES THAT ARE LAWFUL a IN WASHINGTON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DECLINING TO COOPERATE Q WITH AN OUT OF STATE SUBPOENA, SEARCH WARRANT OR COURT ORDER THAT HAS N NOT BEEN DOMESTICATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. c 0 Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, suggesting the council vote on the reconsideration w before the amendment. Mr. Taraday agreed. E Councilmember Paine restated the motion: TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION. Q MOTION TO RECONSIDER CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, WITH PASSAGE OF THIS RESOLUTION, THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS THE EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT REFRAIN FROM PROVIDING ANY COOPERATION OR ASSISTANCE WHATSOEVER TO ANY OUT-OF-STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, PUBLIC ENTITY OR PRIVATE PARTY IF THE MATTER CONCERNS ABORTION -RELATED CONDUCT OR OTHER REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE OR SERVICES THAT ARE LAWFUL IN WASHINGTON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECLINING TO COOPERATE WITH AN OUT-OF-STATE SUBPOENA, SEARCH WARRANT, OR COURT ORDER THAT HAS NOT BEEN DOMESTICATED IN WASHINGTON. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 82 7.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis said she was not sure where this language came from. She had not read it in any of the materials and therefore would not support it. Council President Olson recalled a comment by the city attorney to have the mayor direct staff rather than the council asking the police department. Mr. Taraday said the motion contains the word "request" versus "direct," a key distinction. The council should not direct employees to do anything. Council President Olson said an earlier version referred to a City of Edmonds policy which may be more appropriate and stronger. She asked if the maker of motion would make that change, to reference City of Edmonds policy. Councilmember K. Johnson said she was also concerned with the language. She wondered if it would be preferable to direct the mayor to ask the police department because the council can tell the mayor what to do but cannot tell his staff what to do. As the executive, the mayor takes direction from the city council. Mr. Taraday clarified the council adopts policy; where that policy is in the form of a law, the mayor is tasked with enforcing the laws of the City. An independently elected mayor does not have the same relationship to the council as a city manager who reports to the city council. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if the council could make it the policy of City to fit within that chain of command. Mr. Taraday said that was similar to the motion that Council President Olson was contemplating by including the word "policy" in the motion. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if Mr. Taraday could craft that language. Mr. Taraday said one option would be, "With the passage of this resolution, it shall be the policy of the City of Edmonds to refrain from providing any cooperation or assistance whatsoever to any out-of-state law enforcement agency, public entity or private party if the matter concerns abortion -related conduct or other reproductive health care or services that are lawful in Washington including but not limited to declining to cooperate without any out-of-state subpoena, search warrant or court order that has not been domesticated in Washington." Councilmember K. Johnson offered that language to keep the mayor, council and staff in its proper order. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO a EXTEND TO 10:30. MOTION CARRIED (5-1) COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Q N Mr. Taraday restated the pending amendment: cm AMEND SECTION 4 TO READ AS FOLLOWS: "WITH THE PASSAGE OF THIS RESOLUTION, IT SHALL BE THE POLICY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS TO REFRAIN w FROM PROVIDING ANY COOPERATION OR ASSISTANCE WHATSOEVER TO ANY OUT- OF-STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, PUBLIC ENTITY OR PRIVATE PARTY IF THE MATTER CONCERNS ABORTION -RELATED CONDUCT OR OTHER REPRODUCTIVE t HEALTH CARE OR SERVICES THAT ARE LAWFUL IN WASHINGTON INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECLINING TO COOPERATE WITHOUT ANY OUT-OF-STATE SUBPOENA, SEARCH WARRANT OR COURT ORDER THAT HAS NOT BEEN Q DOMESTICATED IN WASHINGTON.. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (6-0), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES. 3. ORDINANCE REPEALING OR AMENDING CERTAIN CHAPTERS OF ECC TITLE 4 LICENSES AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER RELATED TO SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS (Previously Consent Agenda Item 8.7) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 23 Packet Pg. 83 City Clerk Scott Passey said he asked Council President Olson to pull this from consent as he received late breaking information from the development services department about retaining chapter 4.80 related to aircraft landing permits. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, FOR ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND STRIKING THE REPEAL OF CHAPTER 4.80. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if this was related to handheld aviation devices. Mr. Passey said he was not sure what it relates to; there was apparently reference in the code to chapter 4.80 in a few places and staff felt to be safe, they wanted to keep it in the code for the time being and strike it later if necessary. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Olson referred to the citizen comment about unopened rights -of -way. She asked if that was on the fee schedule. This has been on the agenda no fewer than six times and that wasn't something that came up. She acknowledged the citizens comment, it will be looked at and brought back for amendment if necessary. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 4269, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF OR AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN CHAPTERS OF TITLE 4 ECC LICENSES AND THE AND ADOPTION OF A NEW CHAPTER TO TITLE 4 ECC RELATING TO SPECIAL PERMITS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. CITY OF LYNNWOOD/MEADOWDALE PARK ILA 2022 EXPENDITURE REQUEST Council President Olson relayed Councilmember K. Johnson's interest in this going back to committee. Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Director Angie Feser advised this was pretty complicated and it may be best to take it back to committee. She recommended it be considered in conjunction with the anticipated renewal of the 2025 deadline on the entire ILA. 3. OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT (OPMA) TRAINING (PART 2) Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Nelson thanked everyone who came to the 4th of July parade, the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce for putting it together, and City staff for their support. It was great to see the new police bike patrol and well as South County Fire's bike patrol. He thanked those who refrained from lighting off fireworks, acknowledging some were disappointed the City did not have official, authorized fireworks this year. He was confident fireworks would return to the redone Civic Park next year. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for everyone's input in the process. As we celebrate the birth of the nation, remember we are all here because of one idea, treasuring freedom. The 4' of July is a big celebration to carry on that spirit. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 24 Packet Pg. 84 N N Ln 0 0 w c m E 0 2 Q Councilmember Buckshnis commented everyone had a good time at the 4t' of July parade. She was shocked and saddened to hear what happened in Highland Park, an area she used to visit, commenting it was unfortunate people will shoot up a 4t' of July parade. She appreciated everyone who contacted her about Roe v. Wade, noting it is a very complicated issue due to financial implications and abortions related to domestic violence, incest, domination, etc. Council President Olson recognized the different times that various members of our society have gain their freedom. She looked forward to a day when the 4' of July can be celebrated as freedom for everyone and appreciating everyone's freedoms. There was a fair amount of fireworks in spite of the ban and she hoped in the future the community would embrace the ban as fireworks are very dangerous and a fire hazard. She thanked Ms. Feser for being professionally dressed and ready to go for her agenda item. Councilmember Paine thanked everyone involved in the great 41'' of July celebration. It was a wonderful time, and it was great to have the parade back and people downtown. It sounded a bit like a war zone on the 4t' of July; she preferred a more silent 4' of July celebration instead of the booms and bangs, particularly after the semi -automatic gunfire that Highland Park experienced during their parade. There has to be something better for people to do and there needs to be a better way to treat people before they do that. Councilmember L. Johnson thanked everyone who came out tonight and/or emailed the council to share their concerns, fears and personal stories. It is not an easy topic for anyone and she appreciated those who were willing to be vulnerable, share and advocate for what they believe is right. She shared her feelings of deep sadness for the six people who were shot and killed in Highland Park at a parade celebrating the idea of freedom from oppressive rule. It is an idea because not everyone is free. That speaks volumes about the state of the nation and the work left to do when people can be shot and killed while celebrating freedom. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 10:29 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 5, 2022 Page 25 Packet Pg. 85 N N Ln O O W r-� C E t 0 2 r� Q 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Approval of Council Committee Minutes Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Committee Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative The Council committee meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: PSPHSP071222 FC071222 PPW071222 Packet Pg. 86 7.3.a PUBLIC SAFETY, PLANNING, HUMAN SERVICES, & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING July 12, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair) Councilmember Susan Paine Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Elected Officials Present Councilmember Diane Buckshnis 1. CALL TO ORDER Staff Participating Virtually Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Michelle Bennett, Police Chief Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPHSP Committee meeting was called to order at 4:30 p.m. by Councilmember L. Johnson. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Administrative Services Job Descriptions Mr. Turley explained there are four accounting specialist positions in administrative services, one that does payroll, one that does accounts payable/receivable, and two that do utility billing; each have a job description written specifically and uniquely for that job. The accounting skills are similar enough that the job descriptions for the three positions could be combined into one which would assist with cross - training and work coverage for one another. This proposal is acceptable to the union, the employees and HR. Staff's recommendation is to combine the three job descriptions into one. Discussion followed regarding support for the proposal, limiting siloing and providing backup when needed. Action: Consent Agenda 2. New Public Records Associate Position Mr. Turley explained the City currently has one public records officer who handles all public records requests other than for the police department who does their own. Public records requests have increased dramatically in the last year and fulfilling them take a great deal of time especially when information needs to be redacted. The proposed public records associate position, which would be two pay ranges below the public records, would respond immediately to requests and handle simple requests as well as provide vacation coverage and have opportunity for advancement. The packet includes statistics regarding the increase in public records requests. Discussion followed the growth in requests this year over last year, reasons for the increase in requests, whether requests are made by the same people, redactions made by city attorney's office, public records requests related to elected officials, opportunity for technology solutions, best practices for electeds related to public records requests, legislative changes related to public records requests, requests received for years' worth of emails, asking a requester for specificity, and restrictions against requesting information for commercial purposes. Packet Pg. 87 7.3.a 07/12/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 2 Mr. Turley clarified the request is for a new job description and an FTE. He anticipated the position would be filled by approximately September; the position could be funded for the remaining four months from salary savings due to other vacancies or via a budget amendment. Discussion continued regarding financials not driving operations, a suggestion to add review of the position to the Finance Committee agenda, and a preference to have this position go to full council. Action: Full council 3. Public Records Specialist Position Request Chief Bennett explained this position is related to public disclosure requests (PDR) specific to body cameras. She provided statistics and lessons learned from the Seattle Police Department; all officers were equipped with body cameras in 2017. At that time they had 8 public disclosure personnel, 2 litigation support analysts, and a full-time video specialist. Seattle now has 13 public disclosure personnel, 2 litigation support analysts, 1 communication analyst and 3 video specialists and over 3.4 million videos in Evidence.com and have retained all video since the programs inception. She anticipated Edmonds would purge video that is not of evidentiary value in 30-90 days. Since Edmonds Police Department's pilot program began, it was discovered every 1 hour of video takes 6-10 hours to redact. Existing staff has been doing that work which has been difficult. The delay in proceeding with a full body camera program is due in part to the need for these PDR positions. She was hopeful that two positions would be enough to handle PDR specific to bodycams. This is a request for a second position (one position was included in the budget); the job description is included in the agenda packet. The original position was anticipated to be a commissioned person but it was determined the disclosures could be handled by a non-commissioned person which is less expensive. Staff's recommendation is to approve the job description and the budget request for a second position. Questions and discussion followed regarding hazards mentioned in the job description, support for the job description but concern with a request for second position, a suggestion to clarify the need for a second position in the agenda memo, and efficiencies associated with posting and filling two positions at the same time. Action: Full Council with explanation regarding the need for a second position. 4. Police Cadet Position Chief Bennett explained the budget for this position has already been approved. The job description was updated using information from Lynnwood's cadet program and the pay range was also updated. Discussion followed regarding support for this internship position and assistance this position will provide to the police department. Action: Consent Agenda 5. Public Information Officer Job Description Revision Council President Olson explained the intent was to add clarity regarding the role of the public information officer (PIO) which would be helpful to the person in the position as well as those the position reports to. The draft update to the job description in the packet reflects the research of other cities done by the council's executive assistant regarding the PIO job description as well as input from Interim Director Merriman who supervised the position at the time and who had experience working with PIOs in other cities. The job description was reviewed by Director Neill Hoyson and some changes were made, primarily removing "neutral" due to the difficulty quantifying that aspect. Packet Pg. 88 7.3.a 07/12/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 3 Questions and discussion followed regarding whether it was standard/accepted practice for the legislative branch to attempt to censor/limit information coming from the executive branch, concern with the legislative branch determining what was fact based, the role of the PIO, opinion pieces not within the role of the PIO, enforcement, redundancy in the description, PIO job descriptions in other cities, lack of a forum for the mayor to express their opinion, PIO as the City's mouthpiece and not opinion based, concern with council overstep, preference for opinion pieces to come from the mayor and not from the PIO, and concern this is person -based and not needs -based. Action: Return to PSPHSP Committee next month. 6. Repeal of Safe Gun Storage and Related Laws after Washington Supreme Court's Field Preemption Ruling Due to the late hour, this item was not considered. Councilmember L. Johnson advised the committee may have a special meeting to discuss this item. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 5:31 p.m. Packet Pg. 89 7.3.b FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING July 12, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair) Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Councilmember Will Chen Michelle Bennett, Police Chief Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk 1. CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online Finance Committee meeting was called to order at 5:32 p.m. by Councilmember Buckshnis. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Position Conversions to 1.0 FTE for DV Coordinator and Parking Enforcement Positions Chief Bennett explained the parking enforcement officer is currently a .75 FTE and the request is to increase it to 1.0 FTE. The domestic violence coordinator is currently a .5 FTE and the request is to increase it to 1.0 FTE. The reason for the request is realistic staffing levels and it is much easier to fill a full-time position. The City has not had a parking enforcement position for a year; revenues are down and parking complaints continue to arise throughout the City. There is a large gap in services available to victims of domestic violence and for victim advocacy. Domestic violence incidents range up to 400 year which includes some unhoused individuals which the social worker and domestic violence advocate can collaborate on. Questions and discussion followed regarding whether the domestic violence coordinator should be a social worker, differences between a domestic violence advocate and a social worker, whether domestic violence cases increased during the pandemic, importance of the domestic violence advocacy's work, and the domestic violence advocate collaborating with the social worker. Action: Domestic violence coordinator - full council; parking enforcement — consent agenda Discussion followed regarding staffing for the community storefront on Highway 99, safety improvements at the storefront, future budget request to staff the storefront with an officer, bike officers who plan to patrol near the storefront, and increased police presence on Highway 99. 2. Business Improvement District - Collections Update Collections Questions and discussion followed regarding sending out the delinquency letter, whether writing off debt from closed businesses was a gift of public funds, and pursuing delinquent dues from active businesses. The City Charging the BID Mr. Turley described staff's activities in support of the BID. N N N 0 U U_ r c as E a Packet Pg. 90 7.3.b 07/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 Pam Stuller, BID, pointed out the BID's budget assumption did not include a charge from the City and she urged committee members to consider the value of BID to the City. Discussion followed regarding whether dues could be increased to cover administrative fees, the process for increasing dues, and the council assistant researching amounts charged by other cities. 12% Delinquency Fee Discussion included the amount of the fees, collection rate, serial non -payers, delaying collection during 2020, and waiving delinquent fees in 2020, Collection Agency Discussion included that a collection agency was not an effective method for businesses, small amount are not worth the collection agency's time, and changing the policy regarding the threshold amount to send to a collection agency. Action: Staff send delinquency letter now and further discussion by the task force 3. 2020 Audit Follow-up Actions Mr. Turley explained in 2020 the City distributed over $1 million in small grants to businesses and individuals in Edmonds, federal CARES funds provided via the Department of Commerce in accordance with eligibility criteria that was reviewed and adopted by Council. The auditor's office audited the grant distribution process and questioned 109 grants totaling $871,500. Staff reviewed the grants and made a judgment that out of the 109, 33 (totaling $268,500) did not qualify. Staff recommends sending a strongly worded letter stating they did not qualify for the grant and asking them to return the money. All the grants were $10,000 or less, most were approximately $2,000. After the letter is sent, the results will be evaluated and a decision made regarding how to proceed; options include doing nothing (not staff's intent), civil court, or criminal court. Questions and discussion followed regarding the auditor's identification of 109 businesses/individuals a who did not qualify, how the auditor's list was narrowed to 33, whether businesses should be required g to be located in Edmonds, providing follow-up to the auditor, potential audit question about distribution N of ARPA funds in 2021, and staffing issues associated with sending out the letters. r- 0 Action: Send letter to 33 businesses/individuals U_ r c 4. ERP Update E Mr. Turley relayed staff is currently implementing the OpenGov budget module which is separate from Q an ERP (the entire financial system). The City hired a consultant as a project manager to research ERP examples and provide a report and recommendation. Questions and discussion followed regarding staffing issues that may affect selection and implementation of the ERP system, research the consultant is doing, whether to delay pursuit of an ERP, end date for support of the Eden financial system, time it will take to implement a new financial system, whether the 2023 budget will utilize OpenGov, timeline for implementing OpenGov, and how financial information is input into OpenGov. Action: Staff continue to provide updates at finance committee meetings 5. May 2022 Monthly Financial Report Mr. Turley reviewed: Packet Pg. 91 7.3.b 07/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3 • Noteworthy items: o REET revenues are down $405,510 from this time last year, but only $42,632 under budget. o Sales Tax is up $561,209 from this time last year. o Gas Utility Tax is up $56,776 from this point in time last year (colder than usual spring). o Parks & Recreation Program Fees are up $136,020 from this point in time last year. o Interfund Reimbursement — Contract Services — January through May of 2022 Engineering Overhead has not yet been recorded; we are waiting on this from Engineering. January through May of 2021 was a total of $905,601. o Traffic Infraction Penalties are down $(60,448) from this point in time last year (vacancy in the enforcement officer position). • Sales Tax Revenues for 5 months ended May 31 - $561,000 ahead of last year, and $590,000 ahead of budget • Sales Tax Revenues for 12 months ended May 31 by category Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: May 2022 Year -to -Date Total $4,483,349 A.c.—'e Re. Amrsane¢r& $s"317 1 Pxcreaiio¢. $29916 Consuucii' Tsaae_ Health R EW'.508 Peno¢al care. Busuress 9ercices. A.—cudAS- S119.935 ME& Cxso�n4re1_a$9 13 5I5495 .!Wu F.4 Sra ies. i13e,7c 1AbSIb Cma—s mi" Actnd. - S1W_l6 Muck sak Tmm e. $1524� J 0011''.$73,3�0 Man¢hchviag. SS??s4 • Real Estate Excise Tax Revenues for 5 months ended May 31 - Under budget by $43,000 (97.3%) • Preliminary results are in for last year: The General Fund's ending fund balance at 12/31/2021 s 41 b,Y31,3bJ, the Uty"s largest ever. Edmonds - General F u nd, Budget and Actual for 2021 Final Budget Revenues $ 42,197,229 Expenses (45,353,097) Revenues over(under) Expenses (3,165,368) Net Transters(Out) (529,332) Net Change in Fund Balance (3,695,200) Fund Balance, 1/1/2021 13,868,745 Fund Balance, 12/31/2021 $ 10,173,545 Actual Results Vari ce from Budget $ 43,697,155 (41,365,223) $ 1,509,926 3,997,874 2,331,932 (269,323) 5,497,800 260,009 2,062,(i09 13,868,745 5,757,809 $ 15,931,354 $ 5,757,809 Per Preliminary Annual Report, NOT incl, GF Sub Funds • Preliminary results are in for last year - City-wide Budget compared to Actual Results Ecmands -Pre I irninarV City -Wide Results, Budget anc Actual for 2021 =mal Eudgzt Revenues $ 120,2E0,616 Expenses 435,015,309) Revenues over (under) Expenses {14,734,693) Fund Balance, 1/112021 137,L8,098 Fund Balance, 12/31/2021 $ 122,4E3,405 Actual Results Variance from Budge - $ 124,175,732 (113,L9�582) $ 4,195,116 21,524,727 1C,985,750 137,19E109E 25,719,843 - $ 14E,183,24E $ 25,719,843 Per Preliminary December Monthly Report Packet Pg. 92 7.3.b 07/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 4 With $ 16 million of fund balance in the General Fund alone, the city remains in a very strong position financially. o General Fund, Fund 001, Restricted fund balance - $7,493,332 o General Fund, Fund 001, Unrestricted fund balance - $$8,438,022 o Contingency Fund 012, restricted - $1,768,863 Questions and discussion followed regarding where bond funds are recorded and staff vacancies. Action: Received for Filing agenda item 6. Miscellaneous Discussion followed regarding requests for additional position 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 7:23 p.m. s N N N O U U- r c m E t tv .r a Packet Pg. 93 7.3.c PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING July 12, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Elected Officials Present Councilmember Diane Buckshnis CALL TO ORDER Staff Participating Virtually Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural Arts & Human Serv. Dir. Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec. & Cultural Arts & Human Serv. Dir. Scott Passey, City Clerk Jeff Taraday, City Attorney The Edmonds City Council virtual online PPW Committee meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Councilmember Tibbott. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Oktoberfest Event Agreement Ms. Burley explained this is a special event agreement with the Rotary to host Oktoberfest which was cancelled twice due to Covid. Oktoberfest is a two-day festival in September at the Frances Anderson Center as well as a 5k. The Rotary is partnering with a professional event management company to host the event who has been fabulous to work with. This is a free event; proceeds benefit nonprofits in the community. The contract has been reviewed by all City departments and the city attorney. Questions and discussion followed regarding a suggestion to have contracts between the City and Chamber of Commerce for Halloween and the tree lighting instead of special events permits, parking for the event, events moving back to Civic Park once it is completed, ADA parking, and potentially using streatery fees to provide additional parking. Action: Consent Agenda. 2. City of Lynnwood/Meadowdale Park ILA 2022 Expenditure Request Ms. Feser recalled this was presented to the PPW Committee last month who recommended a presentation to full council. As there was insufficient time at the council meeting for the presentation, it was referred back to committee for further discussion. She introduced Lynn Sordel, City of Lynnwood Parks Director. Ms. Feser reviewed the Meadowdale Playfields Park Playground Project Funding Request: • Map with the location of the Meadowdale Playfields Park, Edmonds and Lynnwood city limits, Meadowdale Middle School and Meadowdale Elementary • Aerial identifying Meadowdale Playfields Park (3 softball fields, 2 multipurpose fields, parking lot and existing playground), Meadowdale Elementary (2 small playgrounds on opposite side of building from the park) and Meadowdale Middle School (no playground) • Facility Agreement History Date Agreement/Jurisdiction Purpose Expiration 1985 Development/Operations Agreement o Development of adopted 1985 Master Plan 2025 City of Lynnwood Packet Pg. 94 7.3.c 07/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 City of Edmonds Snohomish County Edmonds School District 2012 Interlocal Agreement ILA Extension o Extend Lynnwood's use by 40 years 2065 City of Lynnwood o Lynnwood additional use IF Edmonds Edmonds School District ceases use (2025 renewal) o Establish cost sharing between COL — ESD future redevelopment 2017 Interlocal Agreement (ILA) o Meadowdale Playfields Redevelopment 2025 City of Lynnwood Project — athletic fields (5), fencing and City of Edmonds path ($5.15M) Edmonds School District • 2017 Playfield Redevelopment Project o $2,597,155 City of Lynnwood o $1,000,000 Edmonds School District (property owner o $750,000 RCO local parks and YAF o $500,000* City of Edmonds o $300,000 Snohomish Count o $5,147,155 Total cost estimate *City of Edmonds funded backstops, safety netting and fencing, walkways and ADA improvements of the 5 athletic fields Inclusive Playground project costs - $507,077, City of L nnwood requesting 50% Existing Project Sources Yost Pool Re faster Project savings $94,500 Greenhouse Replacement Recollection Goffette donation can cover this expenditure) $50,000 Civic Park Stormwater Mitigation Project* if ARPA funding is allocated to cover this expenditure) $104,038 Funding total $248,538 *If the council chooses not to cover the $104,038 balance with this proposed allocation, then the funding would need to come from another source outside of the Parks Capital program such as the General Fund Ms. Feser relayed the request is council consideration of City of Lynnwood's request for 50% funding costs of the Meadowdale Playfields Park Playground project Mr. Sordel commented on the importance of the City of Lynnwood's relationship with Edmonds, future renegotiation of the ILA, meetings Lynnwood has had with Edmonds since 2017 regarding this project, Lynnwood's interest in remaining equal partners with Edmonds, importance of the facility to both communities, outreach to the community, the school district's contribution to the fields, and replacement of the 40 year old playground equipment is a maintenance and operational issue. Questions and discussion followed regarding importance of partnering with Lynnwood, the definition of maintenance and operations, concern with investing in a school district property when the school district is not contributing, changes to the proposed playground replacement to make it inclusive, another ADA playground in Edmonds near this location, public feedback regarding accessibility, concern Edmonds was not involved in the design of the playground, funds in the PROS Plan capital program for this project, the inclusive playground in Civic Park, and concern the cost of the playground upgrade should be shared between Lynnwood, Edmonds and the Edmonds School District. Questions and discussion continued regarding requesting funding from Snohomish County, parties in the 2017 ILA, maintaining a relationship with Lynnwood, whether the playground would be upgraded without Edmonds' participation, future investment to replace field turf, collaborating on projects and funding, identifying projects over the next 6-10 years for this park and how the three partners will Packet Pg. 95 7.3.c 07/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 contribute to those, terms in the ILA to move Edmonds' use to other fields, data indicating the importance of this park to the Edmonds community, Lynnwood's commitment to partnering with Edmonds, and the level of urgency to replace the playground equipment. The committee recommended further discussion between Ms. Feser and Mr. Sordel regarding negotiating the ILA and funding for the playground project. Action: Full council 3. Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Department - Q2 Report Action: Information only 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 8:36 p.m. Packet Pg. 96 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Approval of claim checks. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #253119 through #253172 dated July 7, 2022 for $160,862.28 (re -issued check #253132 $18,227.19) and claim checks #253173 through #253272 dated July 14, 2022 for $715,450.60 (re -issued check #253252 $277.00). Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 07-07-22 claims 07-14-22 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 07-14-22 Packet Pg. 97 7.4.a vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253119 7/7/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun INV-2-19068 EDMONDS PD - CLARK FIRST TAC POLO 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 42.9� NAME TAPE EMBROIDERY 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 8.0( y PATCH INSTALL U 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 4.0( E 10.1 % Sales Tax R 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 5.5E INV-2-19266 EDMONDS PD - AWARDS INVENTO 0 3 STAR RECOGNITION BARS > 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 200.0( o Freight a 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 14.7( Q 10.5% Sales Tax ci 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 22.5E INV-2-19385 EDMONDS PD - VICK C CLASS A BLAUER SHIRT c 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 94.9E CLOTH BADGE TAB E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 1.61 Z 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.7E INV-2-19520 EDMONDS PD - PETTIT E BIANCHI DUTY BELT @ 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 62.0( Q NYLON INNER BELT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 27.5( BELT KEEPERS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 17.2E OC MOLLE POUCH 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 27.7E DBL MAG POUCH 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 39.5( Page: 1 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 2 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253119 7/7/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC (Continued) MOLLE CUFF CASE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 33.7,' FIRST TACTICAL PANTS - 2 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 129.9E ui 5.11 BOOTS m 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 145.0( u 10.1 % Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 48.7E 'R Total: 935.6E 0 253120 7/7/2022 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 15-95000 INTERPRETER CHUUKESE 1A0144 R INTERPRETER CHUUKESE 1 A01 44 0 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 L 170.0( Q- 15-95022 INTERPRETER KOREAN 1A027307� a INTERPRETER KOREAN 1A027307� .. 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 N 214.6E N Total : 384.6° c 253121 7/7/2022 001528 AM TEST INC 127835 WWTP: SAMPLE #22-A007696-7699 c SAMPLE #22-A007696-7699 E E 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 200.0( .2 127932 WWTP: SAMPLE #22-A008628-8631 SAMPLE #22-A008628-8631 c 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 100.0( E 127967 WWTP: SAMPLE #22-A007695 SAMPLE #22-A007695 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 r 125.0( Q Total : 425.0( 253122 7/7/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6560028711 WWTP: 6/29/22 UNIFORMSJOWEI Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58.2' Rentals & Prep Charges $44.93+$4.7 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 49.6z 6560028720 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE Page: 2 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253122 7/7/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 55.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.8< Tota I : 169.1( 253123 7/7/2022 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 84062 CITY OF EDMONDS LOGO & LETTERING HWY 99 OFFI( 001.000.60.557.20.49.00 402.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.60.557.20.49.00 42.2' Tota I : 444.2' 253124 7/7/2022 078981 BAILEY, MARK L 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 11.11 Total : 11.1; 253125 7/7/2022 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 69928 INTERPRETER SPANISH 2A0373931 INTERPRETER SPANISH 2A0373931 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( 69979 INTERPRETER SPANISH XZ054077 INTERPRETER SPANISH XZ054077 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( Total : 260.0( 253126 7/7/2022 075025 BRANDING IRON LLC 15472 FIREWORKS BAN SIGNS Fireworks ban signs 001.000.39.518.61.49.00 1,200.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.39.518.61.49.00 126.0( Total : 1,326.0( 253127 7/7/2022 074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE APR2022 REIMBURSE FOR TRAVEL Express Toll Bridge (Good to Go) for Page: 3 Packet Pg. 100 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253127 7/7/2022 074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE (Continued) 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 4.7( Mileage - 68 miles round trip to 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 39.7E Total: 44.41 253128 7/7/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 28694678 WWTP: 6/2022 CONTRACT CHG - C 6/2022 CONTRACT CHG - COPIER f 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 81.8, 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 8.6( Total: 90.41 253129 7/7/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY CG114098 PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 272.4, 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 28.6' Total: 301.01 253130 7/7/2022 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 17695 WWTP: 5/2022 M/O+SEWER 5/2022 M/O & SEWER 423.000.75.535.80.47.20 42,307.0( 17806 WWTP: 6/2022 M/O+SEWER 6/2022 M/O & SEWER 423.000.75.535.80.47.20 42,307.0( Total: 84,614.0( 253131 7/7/2022 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 22-4170 CITY COUNCIL MTG MINUTES City Council Meeting Minutes 6/28/22 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 450.0( Total : 450.0( 253132 7/7/2022 078973 DREXEL, EVELYN M JUNE 2022 FRAUD FUNDS RETURN- DREXEL - FRAUD FUNDS RETURN- CS22-638 001.000.237.350 18.227.1 Page: 4 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253132 7/7/2022 078973 078973 DREXEL, EVELYN M 253133 7/7/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 5 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 18,227.1 <, 3115 PM: PLASTIC WEDGES PM: PLASTIC WEDGES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 18.9 � ui 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.9� t 3120 WWTP: CRUSHED ICE U CRUSHED ICE - no sales tax on this E 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 2.9� Z 3125 WWTP: PO 735 SCALE BTHRM LITI• o PO 735 SCALE BTHRM LITHIUM R 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 18.9� p 10.5% Sales Tax Q. 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1.9� Q 3133 WWTP: PO 735 NUTS, BOLTS .. PO 735 NUTS, BOLTS C14 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.7� c 10.5% Sales Tax r- 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1.01 y 3134 PM: TEST PLUG, ADAPTER E PM: TEST PLUG, ADAPTER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 18.5 10.5% Sales Tax m 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.9E E 3135 PM: HOSE U PM: HOSE° 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 r 19.9� Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.1( 3144 PM: PUTTY, ADAPTER PM: PUTTY, ADAPTER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.9f 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.7, 3145 PM: NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS Page: 5 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 253133 7/7/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) PM: NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3146 PM: CHISEL PM: CHISEL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3147 PM: CEMENT, ADAPTER, PARTS PM: CEMENT, ADAPTER, PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3148 PM: PARTS, ADAPTERS, PUTTY PM: PARTS, ADAPTERS, PUTTY 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 253134 7/7/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 7-05276 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 Total 253135 7/7/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH957375 CITY ORDINANCES 4264 & 4265 City ordinances #4264 & #4265 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 Total 253136 7/7/2022 079007 FASTSIGNS BLD2022-0828 REFUND:BLDG - PERMIT WITHDRP Refund:Bldg - Permit withdrawn 001.000.257.620 7.4.a Page: 6 Page: 6 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 7 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253136 7/7/2022 079007 079007 FASTSIGNS (Continued) Total : 132.0( 253137 7/7/2022 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0612343 PM: IRRIGATION PARTS PM: IRRIGATION PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 122.3( 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.6' Total : 134.9 , 253138 7/7/2022 078983 FLOYD, AMANDA MAY 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 28.1 Total: 28.11 253139 7/7/2022 012199 GRAINGER 9340287730 PM SUPPLIES: SHOWER HOSE, ST PM SUPPLIES: SHOWER HOSE, ST 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 293.6E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 30.8E Total: 324.5( 253140 7/7/2022 071759 GRANICH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS BI-0355591 WWTP: PO 797 INSTALL FAIRBANK PO 797 INSTALL FAIRBANKS PUMF 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 16,352.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1,716.9( Total: 18,068.9E 253141 7/7/2022 078449 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO E21CA/RetRelease E21CA/RETAINAGE RELEASE E21CA/RETAINAGE RELEASE 112.000.223.400 4,785.8 , Total : 4,785.8 , 253142 7/7/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1612115 PM: HARDWARE PARTS PM: HARDWARE PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 25.0( 10.3% Sales Tax Page: 7 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253142 7/7/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.5£ 5010806 PM: SAW, HAMMER DRILL KIT, MA( PM: SAW, HAMMER DRILL KIT, MA( 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 279.8, toi 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 28.& 517018 PM: NOZZLES, PAINT, ADHESIVE E PM: NOZZLES, PAINT, ADHESIVE M 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 145.2.E 10.3% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.9E 8517340 PM: LAWN FERTILIZER o L PM: LAWN FERTILIZER a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 77.9z Q 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 N 8.0< N Total : 582.5: o 253143 7/7/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0552850778 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY r- N MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 111.6E �a Total: 111.6! c 253144 7/7/2022 078794 JR SMOOTS CONSULTING LLC JRSC2022-01 UPDATES TO WOTS MICROSOFTA E UPDATES TO WOTS MICROSOFT A 117.100.64.573.20.41.40 500.0( Total : r 500.0( Q 253145 7/7/2022 078984 KILKER, KATHERINE M 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 13.9£ Total : 13.9E 253146 7/7/2022 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING 47530035185 ACCT#2185-952778-727 CITY HALL Shredding services 5/25/22 Page: 8 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 9 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253146 7/7/2022 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING (Continued) 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 25.0( Tota I : 25.0( 253147 7/7/2022 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLYCO 053111 01 PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 116.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.2E Total : 129Z 253148 7/7/2022 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 02791 CS 22-10253 - EDMONDS PD TOW GRAY JETTA- CS 22-10253 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 208.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 21.8z Total : 229.8z 253149 7/7/2022 078985 MCCARTNEY, PEGGY C 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 26.0E Total : 26.01 253150 7/7/2022 078988 MCDONALD, JOHN CULLY 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 23.5" Total : 23.51 253151 7/7/2022 078809 MCKAY POLYGRAPH 062822EPD EDMONDS PD 2 PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH; 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 350.0( Total : 350.0( 253152 7/7/2022 078989 MILLS, PETER JONATHAN 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 26.7� Page: 9 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 10 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253152 7/7/2022 078989 078989 MILLS, PETER JONATHAN (Continued) Total : 26.7< 253153 7/7/2022 078987 MORGAN, LEAH MARIE 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 13.1( Total : 13.1E 253154 7/7/2022 078990 NAPPEN, VERONICA 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 12.1 Total : 12.1' 253155 7/7/2022 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 246325850001 ACCT 90520437 - EDMONDS PD PAPERMATE PENS - FLEX GRIP 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 57.8( PAPERMATE PENS - INKJOY 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 14.0( POST IT NOTES- BULK PACK -DISC 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 31.8� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.8� 246513881001 ACCT 90520437 - EDMONDS PD 3 ORGANIZER BOXES - EHLERT -D 001.000.41.521.10.35.00 193.8, 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.35.00 20.3f Total: 328.7° 253156 7/7/2022 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 056340 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL SUPPLIES: 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,327.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 139.4, Total : 1,467.2: 253157 7/7/2022 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2V82830 WWTP: PO 850 MOTOR CIRCUIT Page: 10 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253157 7/7/2022 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 253158 7/7/2022 078986 REED, JANICE LEE 253159 7/7/2022 078283 REINTEGRATED MEDIA 253160 7/7/2022 068657 ROBERT HALF 253161 7/7/2022 075742 ROSE, LAURIE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PO 850 MOTOR CIRCUIT 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Tota I : 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 Tota I : 443 A/V TECH SUPPORT FOR HYBRID ( 5 hours of Tech support for meeting o 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 3 hours of Tech Support for Special 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 4 hours of Tech Support for meeting c 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 Tota I : 60291740 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 60307068 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Grants 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 Tota I : 6/16/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 Total 7.4.a Page: 11 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253162 7/7/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 200326460 200663953 201054327 201557303 201610276 201762101 202161535 202250635 202579520 204467435 222704264 253163 7/7/2022 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 25580 PO # Description/Account HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 I BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CEMETERY BUILDING CEMETERY BUILDING 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT i OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT i 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 415 5TH AVE S 415 5TH AVE S 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CEMETERY WELL PUMP CEMETERY WELL PUMP 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 WWTP: 6/1-6/30/22 ENERGY MGMT 6/1-6/30/22 ENERGY MANAGEMEN 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 HAZEL MILLER PLAZA HAZEL MILLER PLAZA 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 WWTP: 5/24-6/23/22 FLOWMETER 5/24-6/23/22 FLOWMETER 1000520; 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 Total WWTP: 6/2022 JANITORIAL SERVIC 7.4.a Page: 12 Amoun 21.5, 90.3' > 0 L 0. a 8.9( Q N N 27.6� o N 158.3, . �a v 20.7E a0i E t U 11.0E r Q 23.0( 503.71 Page: 12 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253163 7/7/2022 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC (Continued) 6/2022 JANITORIAL SERVICES 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 1,165.E 1 Total: 1,165.61, 253164 7/7/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103584 WWTP: ACCT 103584 - 6/2022 REC' ACCT 103584-6/2022 RECYCLING - 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 38.7.E 201159 WWTP: ACCT #201159 - 6/2022 GA 6/2022 GARBAGE - INV. #298745 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 147.4, Total: 186.1 , 253165 7/7/2022 078982 SZILASSY, LISA CASTILLANO 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 22.8- Total : 22.81 253166 7/7/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 024012 WWTP: PO 855 AMMONIA REAGEN PO 855 AMMONIA REAGENT 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 279.4( HACH Surcharge. 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 33.5E Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 17.6( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 34.7- Total : 365.2E 253167 7/7/2022 064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE 1184 SPRING SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTF SPRING SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTF 001.000.64.571.25.49.00 2,440.0( Total : 2,440.0( 253168 7/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9909443231 C/A 571242650-0001 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bldg Page: 13 Packet Pg. 110 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253168 7/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 14 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 680.8E iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 001.000.31.514.31.42.00 36.31 . . iPhone/iPad Cell Service Comm Svc 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 190.8" iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 746.3E E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court 001.000.23.512.51.42.00 375.8' _M iPhone/iPad Cell Service Dev Svcs o 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 271.4, > iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering o 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 1,426.0E a iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities Q 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 368.1' N iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance N 001.000.31.514.20.42.00 36.3z r- c iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance Q 0 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 76.6E iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR E E 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 241.7E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Human Sen 001.000.63.557.20.42.00 50.3E c iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS E 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 449.2E @ iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor Q 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 100.7( iPhone/iPad Cell Service Park Admin 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 50.3E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Maint 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 406.7� iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Rec 001.000.64.571.22.42.00 191.0E iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD Page: 14 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253168 7/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 15 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 2,778.4, Air cards PD 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 1,280.5, iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 450.5" iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin U 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 45.3E E iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 12.9E iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin o 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 45.3E > iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin o 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 12.9E a iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin Q 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 12.9E N iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street N 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 166.7' c iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/SeWe Q 0 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 95.5< iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/Sewe E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 95.51 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 369.1 z c iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water E 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 537.1 z u. . iPhone/iPad Cell Service Storm Q 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 156.3, iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 305.2E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 305.2z iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 661 M iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Disco Page: 15 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253168 7/7/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 253169 7/7/2022 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 16 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 140.7E 9909443231 cm C/A 571242650-0001 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Fleet 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 -31.5� 9909582768 C/A 772540262-00001 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 421.000.74.534.80.49.20 3.3E E Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm M 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 3.3E Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm o 423.000.75.535.80.49.20 3.4( Trimble 1 - Storm o L 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 10.0, a Lake Ballinger monitor Q 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 31.4; N Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te N 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 17.0E o Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te r- 0 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 17.0E N 9909582768 cm C/A 772540262-00001 E Cradlepoint 1 - IT 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 -48.3f Total: 13,176.41 E 122-376 PM: TREE REMOVAL: EDMONDS CI t PM: TREE REMOVAL: EDMONDS CI r 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 11250.0( Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 131.2.E 122-377 PM: TREE REMOVAL: PINE RIDGE I PM: TREE REMOVAL: PINE RIDGE I 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 3,100.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 325.5( 122-378 PM: TREE REMOVAL: CEMETERY Page: 16 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 07/07/2022 9:46:34AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253169 7/7/2022 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS (Continued) PM: TREE REMOVAL: CEMETERY 130.000.64.536.50.48.00 3,200.0( 10.5% Sales Tax -71 130.000.64.536.50.48.00 336.0( u) 122-379 PM: TREE REMOVAL: YOST PARK U PM: TREE REMOVAL: YOST PARK m 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 4,000.0( E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 _R 420.0( U Total: 4" 12,762.7E O 253170 7/7/2022 078979 WHITE, AARON GLENN 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1A0273074 - KIM, A R 0 JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A Q. 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 11.7E Q Total: 11.7E N N 253171 7/7/2022 078980 WILSON, GENE 05192022 JURY TRIAL 1A0273074 - KIM, A c JURY TRIAL 1 A0273074 - KIM, A 9 001.000.23.512.51.49.20 10.3E N Total: 10.3E E M 253172 7/7/2022 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 2022-06 EDMONDS SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: JUNE SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: JUNE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 3,914.0( Total: 3,914.0( M 54 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total : 179,089.4, Q 54 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers 179,089.41 Page: 17 Packet Pg. 114 7.4.b vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253173 7/14/2022 041695 3M XAM3522 253174 7/14/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 9417114251 TRAFFIC - WHITE REFLECTIVE SHI TRAFFIC - WHITE REFLECTIVE SHI 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 588.5E 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 61.8( 0 Total: 650.3E r- E INV-2-18689 EDMONDS PD - SCINKOVEC M 3 IN 1 PARKA U 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 249.9� o PATCH INSTALL R 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 16.0( o 2 NAME TAPES a 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 18.0( Q HEAT PRESS ID PANELAC CONTR( N 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 22.0( N 10.1 % Sales Tax r 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 30.9" c INV-2-19382 EDMONDS PD - GILGINAS U) BIKE S/S POLO E 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 55.0( PATCH INSTALL W/CPL CHEVRON a ; 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 16.0( NAME TAPE EMBROIDERY E 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 8.0( u 10.1 % Sales Tax r 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 7.9� Q INV-2-19383 EDMONDS PD - DANIELS PEER SUPPORT POLO 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 39.9� EMBROIDERY 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 12.0( EBROIDERY NAME TAPE 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 8.0( Page: 1 Packet Pg. 115 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253174 7/14/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 253175 7/14/2022 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC 253176 7/14/2022 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 253177 7/14/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 82544 11014 062222030 070722025 253178 7/14/2022 077968 ANIMAL MEDICAL CTR OF SEATTLE 621901 622542 PO # Description/Account 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 Total FIRE STATION 17 - SERVICE & REP FIRE STATION 17 - SERVICE & REP 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 Total WWTP: ACCT: COEWASTE: 6/22/2; Acct COEWaste:- 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 FINANCE DEPT WATER Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 Total CUST 234493 - EDMONDS PD - ACE ACE TOOTH RE -CHECK W/ MEDS 001.000.41.521.26.41.00 CUST 234493 - EDMONDS PD- ACE ACE TOOTH CHECK W/ MEDS 001.000.41.521.26.41.00 Total 7.4.b Page: 2 Amoun 6.0E 489.9d N m t 447.5( U M 46.9� Z 494.4<, o R 0 L Q. 179,054.4( r 179,054.4E " N N T 45.2E C N c 50.2.E t 5.2£ m 105.51 Q 87.7E 71.3E 159.0E Page: 2 Packet Pg. 116 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253179 7/14/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 6560028722 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9' 10.5% Sales Tax -71 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9: 6560030466 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS m 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� E FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 _M 19.1( 10.5% Sales Tax o 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9£ 10.5% Sales Tax o 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 2.0' a 6560030469 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE N 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6" N PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS T 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' c PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' •� PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' E PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE @ 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3" 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, Page: 3 Packet Pg. 117 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253179 7/14/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 4 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� 10.5% Sales Tax -71 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, u) 6560032354 WWTP: 7/6/22 UNIFORMSJOWELS Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 m 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58.2- E Rentals & Prep Charges $44.93+$4.7 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 49.6, 6560032367 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS o FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9' 0- 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9< Q 6560034105 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT N FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS N 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� r FLEET DIVISION MATS c 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.5 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.4, 6560034110 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE @ 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6" Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' Page: 4 Packet Pg. 118 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253179 7/14/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ 10.5% Sales Tax -71 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3" 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, u 10.5% Sales Tax E 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.62 'R 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, O 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, o 10.5% Sales Tax a 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� Q Total: 303.31 c-4 N 253180 7/14/2022 078763 ARTIFACT 062822 CIVIC PARK: AGREEMENT FOR AR - CIVIC PARK: AGREEMENT FOR AR- c 117.200.64.575.50.41.00 1,000.0( N 070122 CIVIC PARK: AGREEMENT FOR AR- E CIVIC PARK: AGREEMENT FOR AR- 117.200.64.575.50.41.00 25,000.0( a ; Total: 26,000.0( E 253181 7/14/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 124273 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS U UB Outsourcing area Printing 1782 f° r 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 130.5E Q UB Outsourcing area Printing 1782 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 130.5E UB Outsourcing area Printing 1782 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 134.5( UB Outsourcing area Postage 1782 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 379.& UB Outsourcing area Postage 1782 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 379.& Page: 5 Packet Pg. 119 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253181 7/14/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 6 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 10.25% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 13.3E 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 13.3E ui 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 13.7� u 124352 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS E UB Outsourcing area Printing 2462 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 _M 180.3 1 UB Outsourcing area Printing 2462 0 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 180.3 1 > UB Outsourcing area Printing 2462 0- 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 185.8, a UB Outsourcing area Postage 2461 Q 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 524.9E N UB Outsourcing area Postage 2461 N 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 524.9E r 10.25% Sales Tax c 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 18.4E 10.25% Sales Tax E E 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 18.4� 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 c 19.0z 124363 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 1751 U M 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 128.2E Q UB Outsourcing area Printing 1751 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 128.2E UB Outsourcing area Printing 1751 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 132.1( UB Outsourcing area Postage 1751 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 372.1 , UB Outsourcing area Postage 1751 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 372.1 , Page: 6 Packet Pg. 120 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 7 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253181 7/14/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) 10.25% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 13.1 f 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 13.1E ui 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 13.5z 124389 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS E UB Outsourcing area Printing 444 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 _M 32.5' UB Outsourcing area Printing 444 0 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 32.5 > UB Outsourcing area Printing 444 0- 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 33.5' a UB Outsourcing area Postage 444 Q 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 117.6E N UB Outsourcing area Postage 444 N 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 117.6E r 10.25% Sales Tax c 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 3.3< 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 3.3< 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 c 3.4z m Total: 4,365.0F E U 253182 7/14/2022 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 17586 DISCOVERY STAFF NAME BADGES +° r DISCOVERY STAFF NAME BADGES Q 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 12.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 1.3' Total : 13.& 253183 7/14/2022 079011 BAUER, ANNIE 2006913.009 REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP 001.000.239.200 288.0( Page: 7 Packet Pg. 121 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253183 7/14/2022 079011 079011 BAUER, ANNIE 253184 7/14/2022 076260 BELAIR, ROGER 253185 7/14/2022 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 253186 7/14/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 253187 7/14/2022 075025 BRANDING IRON LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 8 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 288.0( 10905 PICKLEBALL 10905 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRU 10905 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRU 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 305.0( ui PICKLEBALL 10903 10904 PICKLEBALL CLINIC Il` 10903 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRU 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 300.0( U 10904 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRU 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 E 305.0E 5 Total: 910.0E o 824173 E194FM - PARTS/ CLIP > E194FM - PARTS/ CLIP o Q. 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 48.3E Q 10.25% Sales Tax �- 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 4.9E N 824264 UNIT 6 - PARTS UNIT 6 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.5E 10.25% Sales Tax N E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.2' .m 824444 UNIT 310 - PARTS UNIT 310 - PARTS c 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 369.9, E 10.25% Sales Tax M 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 37.9, Total : r 484.9: Q 1348299 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 592.10 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 592.10 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 2,098.7E Total : 2,098.7E 15008 HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE Page: 8 Packet Pg. 122 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 9 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253187 7/14/2022 075025 BRANDING IRON LLC (Continued) 001.000.60.557.20.49.00 162.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.60.557.20.49.00 17.0( Total: 179.5E 253188 7/14/2022 066807 BROWNING, DARREN JULY2022 CDL REIMBURSEMENT CDL REIMBURSEMENT 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 136.0( Total : 136.0( 253189 7/14/2022 079015 BURKLANE, AMBER Burklane 06-22-22 PEER SUPPORT SUPPLIES - REIME Peer Support BBQ Supplies from CoE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 321.6, Total: 321.6: 253190 7/14/2022 075280 BYRUM, RICHARD A UMPIRE SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 222.0( Tota I : 222.0( 253191 7/14/2022 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 5841298 ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT E ROADWAY - ASPHALT & ASPHALT E 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 167.8E Tota I : 167.8E 253192 7/14/2022 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 95490561 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 420.4f 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 42.4E 95493536 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 152.9( 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 15.4( 95496993 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA Page: 9 Packet Pg. 123 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253192 7/14/2022 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 253193 253194 7/14/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 95502402 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 Total 28694679 EDMONDS PD 6/22 CONTRACT - 38C01511 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 28802928 WATER SEWER COPIER Water Sewer Copier 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 7/14/2022 075092 CASCADE BICYCLE CLUB ED FNDN 40622 Total : E7DC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 E7DC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 112.000.68.595.61.41.00 E7DC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 125.000.68.595.61.41.00 E7DC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 126.000.68.595.61.41.00 E7DC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 7.4.b Page: 10 Amoun 496.9, 50.1 � U) m t U 496.9' E 50.1 1,725.5' O Ta 0 L Q. 191.7E Q N 20.1 < N T 0 57.8, y E 57.8, a: 6.0, E 6.0, U 339.6E r Q 11,240.0( 3,434.0( 5,316.0( Page: 10 Packet Pg. 124 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253194 7/14/2022 075092 CASCADE BICYCLE CLUB ED FNDN (Continued) 253195 7/14/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 253196 7/14/2022 077735 CENTRAL PAVING LLC 253197 7/14/2022 063902 CITY OF EVERETT BB76449 E21 CA. Pmt 3 Final 122003562 253198 7/14/2022 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC JUL-2022 PO # Description/Account 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 Total ; BTI RBC35 REPLACEMENT BATTEF BTI RBC 35 Compatible Lead Acid BE 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 Total E21CA/SERVICES THRU 6.1.22 E21CA/SERVICES THRU 6.1.22 112.000.68.542.30.48.00 E21CA/SERVICES THRU 6.1.22 125.000.68.542.30.48.00 E21CA/SERVICES THRU 6.1.22 126.000.68.542.30.48.00 E21CA/SERVICES THRU 6.1.22 421.000.74.534.80.48.21 E21CA/SERVICES THRU 6.1.22 422.000.72.531.90.48.21 E21CA/SERVICES THRU 6.1.22 423.000.75.535.80.48.21 Total WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 Total C/A CITYOFED00001 Jul-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 Total 7.4.b Page: 11 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 125 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 12 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253199 7/14/2022 078902 COLEMAN OIL COMPANY LLC 2206-026186 REG FUEL - 5,799 GALLONS REG FUEL - 5,799 GALLONS 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 26,002.2z DELIVERY FEE -71 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 275.0( u) 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 28.8E u 10.5% Sales Tax E 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 28.8; 'R DIESEL - 3,800 GALLONS 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 22,633.7< O DELIVERY FEE 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 275.0( o Total: 49,243.7: a a 253200 7/14/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310301175175 CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl .. CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl N N 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 143.9E r 8498310301175191 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF c MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF y 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 143.9E .E Total: 287.9( T 253201 7/14/2022 078378 CONSERVATION TECHNIX INC 1035 PROS PLAN PROFESSIONAL SERV c PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPA E E 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 5,612.4( U Total : 5,612.4( r Q 253202 7/14/2022 078749 DATAFY LLC 2580 DATAFY SERVICES 3RD QUARTER DATAFY SERVICES 3RD QUARTER 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 3,114.0( Tota I : 3,114.0( 253203 7/14/2022 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2022060029 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098 Scan Services for June 2022 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 285.0( Page: 12 Packet Pg. 126 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253203 7/14/2022 047450 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES (Continued) Total : 285.0( 253204 7/14/2022 078943 DIEL, ARNIE WAYNE UMPIRE SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 444.0( ui Total: 444.0( m 253205 7/14/2022 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 22-4171 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MTG, CITY t U City Council Special Meeting 7/05/22 E 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 522.0( Total: 522.0( o 253206 7/14/2022 078494 ECONORTHWEST 25065 DEV SVCS - PROF SVCS > Comprehensive GAP Analysis- 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 3,717.5( a Total: 3,717.5( Q 253207 7/14/2022 075200 EDUARDO ZALDIBAR 69991 INTERPRETER SPANISH 2A03363T N N INTERPRETER SPANISH 2A03363T le 001.000.23.512.51.41.01 130.0( c Total: 130.0( 253208 7/14/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR214525 MK5610 PW & WATER/ SEWER COI PW Copy Use 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 13.8, y PW Copy Use E 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 7.& U PW Copy Use r 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 7.8' Q PW Copy Use 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 5.5' PW Copy Use 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 5.5' PW Copy Use 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.51 WATER/ SEWER COPY USAGE Page: 13 Packet Pg. 127 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253208 7/14/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) AR221804 AR223768 AR223774 AR223891 7.4.b Page: 14 PO # Description/Account Amoun 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 23.0z WATER/ SEWER COPY USAGE 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 23.01' --. 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 1.4z 10.4% Sales Tax U 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 0.8" E 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 0.8' _M 10.4% Sales Tax o 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2.9 1 > 10.4% Sales Tax o 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.9 1 a 10.4% Sales Tax Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.5E N ACCT MK5031 - EDMONDS PD N 5/22 CONTRACT - 38C01511 T 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 75.7( c 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 7.9,1 •� ACCT MK5031 - EDMONDS PD 6/22 METER CHARGES 3AP01257 8 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 266.4E 10.5% Sales Tax E t 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 27.9E u. MK5532 C165 CONTRACT CHARGE Q B/W copier charges 6/1/22 - 6/30/22 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 8.5" 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 54.3, Color copier charges 6/1/22 - 6/30/22 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 508.8, ENGINEERING COPIER 6.2022 ENGINEERING COPIER 6.2022 Page: 14 Packet Pg. 128 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 15 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253208 7/14/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 178.6£ 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 18.7E .. AR223892 DEV SVCS COPIER LEASE Dev Svcs Copier (SN: 3AP01472)- 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 151.7; 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 AR224117 CANON 2501 OVERAGE bw overage 6/2022 0 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.4E clr overage 6/2022 0 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 22.4� 0- 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.6, N AR224125 MK5610 PW & WATER/ SEWER COI N PW Copy Use r 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 8.11 c PW Copy Use 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 4.6, .E PW Copy Use 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 3.2, PW Copy Use 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 3.2, E PW Copy Use @ 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.2, Q WATER/ SEWER - COPY USE 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 13.6, WATER/ SEWER - COPY USE 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 13.6' 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 0.8E 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 0.4� Page: 15 Packet Pg. 129 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253208 7/14/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 253209 7/14/2022 066004 ESRI 253210 7/14/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD PO # Description/Account 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 PW Copy Use 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 Total ; 94274424 ARCGIS COMMUNITY ANALYST WE ArcGIS Community Analyst Web App 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total EDH957297 PLANNING - LEGAL AD Notice of City Application- 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 EDH957476 PLANNING - LEGALAD Notice of City Application- 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 EDH957597 PLANNING - LEGAL AD Notice of Public Hearing- 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 EDH957793 PLANNING - LEGAL AD Notice of City Application- 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 EDH957978 CITY ORDINANCE 4266 City ordinances #4266 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 7.4.b Page: 16 Page: 16 Packet Pg. 130 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253210 7/14/2022 009350 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 253211 7/14/2022 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 253212 253213 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 1088067 1100949 1101581 1101592 PO # Description/Account Total WATER - INVENTORY - WATER - INVENTORY- 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 WATER - INVENTORY - WATER - INVENTORY- 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 WATER - PARTS/ METER BOXES WATER - PARTS/ METER BOXES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 WATER - PARTS/ METER BOXES WATER - PARTS/ METER BOXES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total : 7/14/2022 075538 GAMEZ, OMAR 06302022 OXG - CLAIM FOR EXPENSES/AUTI OXG - CLAIM FOR EXPENSES/AUTI 001.000.23.523.30.43.00 Total 7/14/2022 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 0000034320 UNIT 93 & 6 - TIRES UNIT 93 & 6 - TIRES 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 WA STATE TIRE FEE 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 7.4.b Page: 17 Amoun 313.0' 3,187.8( ui 334.7, U E 2,619.7( 0 275.0, 0 L 0. 4,160.0( Q 436.8( N T 1 5,136.0( N E 539.2E 12 16,689.31 }0, c m E t U 154.5( r 154.5: Q 642.8z 4.0( 68.1 Page: 17 Packet Pg. 131 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 253213 7/14/2022 063137 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTE (Continued) 253214 7/14/2022 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 1261787 253215 7/14/2022 079009 GUENTHER, MACKEY 253216 7/14/2022 012900 HARRIS FORD INC MGuenther June2022 FOCS559225 253217 7/14/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 22282 3011089 3024817 7.4.b Page: 18 Description/Account Amoun Total : 714.91 OLD PW - SECURITY OLD PW - SECURITY 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 60.5( ui 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 6.3,1 t Total: 66.8! U EMPLOYEE REIMB Misc items for Reimagining Neighborl o 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 200.5, R Total: 200.5: o L UNIT 664 - SERVICE FOR CHECK E a UNIT 664 - SERVICE FOR CHECK E Q 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 210.9( N 10.6% Sales Tax � 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 22.3E r Total : 233.2( c U) SEWER - SUPPLIES E SEWER - SUPPLIES 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 23.8E 10.3% Sales Tax a0i 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.4E E FIRE STATION 17 - SUPPLIES/ VAL% U �a FIRE STATION 17 - SUPPLIES/ VAL% r Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 40.9z 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.2, FIRE STATION 20 - SUPPLIES FIRE STATION 20 - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 68.5z 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.0( Page: 18 Packet Pg. 132 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253217 7/14/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 19 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 5080615 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 205.81 . . 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 21.2( 518717 CITY PARK - SUPPLIES CITY PARK - SUPPLIES E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 124.6( 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.81 o 6032083 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES o L 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 27.1, a 10.3% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.8( N 7022947 F.A.C. - ARTS FESTIVAL SUPPLIES/ N F.A.C. - ARTS FESTIVAL SUPPLIES/ r 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 125.8, c 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.9E . 8011663 STREET - SUPPLIES STREET - SUPPLIES a ; 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 22.3, 10.3% Sales Tax E 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 2.3( u 8032058 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES r CITY HALL - SUPPLIES Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.9E 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.3 , 8522314 STREET - SUPPLIES STREET - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 85.3" 10.3% Sales Tax Page: 19 Packet Pg. 133 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 20 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253217 7/14/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 8.7� 9011484 STREET - SUPPLIES/ MOSS OUT STREET - SUPPLIES/ MOSS OUT 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 24.9 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 2.5 9011597 E22DA - WIRE FOR RRFB'S AT 2201 E E22DA - WIRE FOR RRFB'S AT 2201 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 407.1 10.3% Sales Tax o 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 41.9z Total: 1,301.1E o Q. 253218 7/14/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0552862563 PINE RIDGE PARK HONEY BUCKET a PINE RIDGE PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 252.4.E N Total : 252.4E r 253219 7/14/2022 071642 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 14582 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22 E E 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 12,352.6E .� 14598 PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 1,837.1 £ E Total: 14,189.& � M 253220 7/14/2022 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE BID-0622ED BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER JUN Q BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER JUN 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 2,766.6, Total : 2,766.E , 253221 7/14/2022 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG BID-ED2022-06 BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY JUNE 202; BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY JUNE 202; 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.0( Tota I : 600.0( Page: 20 Packet Pg. 134 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 21 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253222 7/14/2022 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 33137 E22CA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 E22CA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 3,859.5, E22CA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 4,476.8, ui E22CA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 m 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 4,313.61 E22CC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22 E 423.000.75.535.80.41.21 384.3� 'R Total : 13,034.35 0 253223 7/14/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC U2216022990 WATER - PARTS/ COUPLING & GAS 'R WATER - PARTS/ COUPLING & GAS p 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 L 1,335.7E a 10.5% Sales Tax Q 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 140.2( N Total: 1,476.01 N 253224 7/14/2022 077398 INCREDIFLIX INC 10871 10870 10871 10870 INCREDIFLIX CLASS II T 10871 INCREDIFLIX CLASS INSTRL N 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 1,080.0( E 10870 INCREDIFLIX CLASS INSTRL 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 1,260.0( Total: 2,340.0( 253225 7/14/2022 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3578446 RUBBER BANDS, LETTER OPENER Rubber bands, letter openers +a, 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 64.4, Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 6.7( Total: 71.2( 253226 7/14/2022 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10102308 FLEET - SUPPLIES/ RTV SILICONE FLEET - SUPPLIES/ RTV SILICONE 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 99.4� 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 21 Packet Pg. 135 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 22 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253226 7/14/2022 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.4z Total: 109.81 253227 7/14/2022 069366 ISSAQUAH HONDA KUBOTA 488851 PM: PARTS PM: PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 50.2( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.2 Total : 55.41 253228 7/14/2022 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 7073 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC Jul-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 590.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 61.9E Total: 651.9E 253229 7/14/2022 078250 KAUFER DMC LLC 2694 BUSINESS BOOSTER WEB HOST11\ BUSINESS BOOSTER WEB HOSTIN 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 300.0( Total : 300.0( 253230 7/14/2022 078901 KOPP, TIM 04/19/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 54.8, Total: 54.8, 253231 7/14/2022 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC INV-085281 E22CA/PAINT E22CA/PAINT 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 36.2, E22CA/PAINT 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 42.0- E22CA/PAINT 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 40.4E 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 22 Packet Pg. 136 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253231 7/14/2022 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 253232 7/14/2022 078935 LEVESQUE, LEROY 253233 7/14/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 253234 7/14/2022 078936 MORGISON, DUANE 253235 7/14/2022 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 Tota I : UMPIRE SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Tota I : 371892 PM: PRESSURE WASHER PM: PRESSURE WASHER 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 UMPIRE 0658049-IN Total : SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total WATER/ SEWER - LABOR REPAIR WATER/ SEWER - LABOR REPAIR 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 WATER/ SEWER - LABOR REPAIR 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 Total 7.4.b Page: 23 Page: 23 Packet Pg. 137 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253236 7/14/2022 077400 NELSON, MIKE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 06212022 253237 7/14/2022 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS N044472 253238 7/14/2022 074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEN 49903 253239 7/14/2022 066628 NW AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY CO LLC 00730808 253240 7/14/2022 067868 NW TANK & ENVIRONMENTAL 99209 253241 7/14/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER June, 2022 PO # Description/Account AWC ANNUAL CONFERENCE mileage reimbursement for AWC conl 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 Total UNITS 19 & 33 - PARTS/ HOSES UNITS 19 & 33 - PARTS/ HOSES 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.9% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total PLAQUES PLAQUES 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 Total FLEET - SUPPLIES/ WASH BRUSH FLEET - SUPPLIES/ WASH BRUSH 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Total FLEET -TANK CERTIFICATION UST FLEET -TANK CERTIFICATION UST 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Total COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI` Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 7.4.b Page: 24 Page: 24 Packet Pg. 138 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253241 7/14/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 253242 7/14/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 0001520 0001530 0002930 0021400 0026390 7.4.b Page: 25 PO # Description/Account Amoun Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 846.0( State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 47.9( ui Judicial Information Systems Account m 001.000.237.180 1,747.9 u School Zone Safety Account E 001.000.237.200 119.7E 'ca Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 652.3E Traumatic Brain Injury _0 001.000.237.260 315.8E o Hwy Safety Acct a 001.000.237.320 206.5E Q WSP Hwy Acct N 001.000.237.340 271.9( Total : 16,701.5, r 0 PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S\ y PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S1 E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 23.8E TU CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW a ; CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW m 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 55.5- E CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ; U CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ; +° r 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 83.7E Q SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 26.2z FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 435.9z PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF Page: 25 Packet Pg. 139 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 26 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253242 7/14/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 26.2z Total: 651.5: 253243 7/14/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-212164 UNIT 102 - 02 SENSOR UNIT 102 - 02 SENSOR 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 48.6E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.1- 3685-212911 FLEET - OIL FILTERS FLEET - OIL FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 31.7z 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 3.3< Tota I : 88.8E 253244 7/14/2022 075735 PACIFIC SECURITY 41986 SECURITY JUNE 20222 SECURITY JUNE 2022 001.000.23.512.51.41.02 3,976.0( Total: 3,976.0( 253245 7/14/2022 074793 PETDATA INC 10884 JUNE 2022 - EDMONDS PD JUNE 2022 1 YR PET LICENSES 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 411.6( 1 REPLACEMENT TAG 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 4.2( 1 LATE FEE COLLECTED 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 2.5( Total: 418.3( 253246 7/14/2022 071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS 2022-34 EDMONDS PD - TRIMBLE SUMMER WT JUMPSUIT W/ALTERF 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 540.0( 8.6% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 46.4z Tota I : 586.4' Page: 26 Packet Pg. 140 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 27 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253247 7/14/2022 072384 PLAY-WELLTEKNOLOGIES 10880 LEGOS 10880 LEGO INSTRUCTION 10880 LEGO INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 2,240.0( Total: 2,240.0( .. 253248 7/14/2022 078800 POPA & ASSOCIATES BID-6 BID/ED! COPYWRITING (LOVIN SUI N BID/ED! COPYWRITING (LOVIN SUI 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 300.0( U Total: 300.0( 253249 7/14/2022 074712 RAINIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAB 4596 WWTP: CERIODAPHNIA ACUTE TE, o CERIODAPHNIA ACUTE TEST 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 R 650.0( o Total: 650.0( Q. a 253250 7/14/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE Q FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 299.2, 3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; r PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; o 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 44.8E E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 170.5' PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 170.5' PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : t 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 170.5' U PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Q 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 170.5< PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 170.5< 3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 288.9z 3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL Page: 27 Packet Pg. 141 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 28 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253250 7/14/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 73.0z Total: 1,558.71 253251 7/14/2022 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-036870 UNIT 3 - BATTERY UNIT 3 - BATTERY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 328.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 34.5z Total : 363.4< 253252 7/14/2022 078818 SCHRODER, ALICIA 2006360.009 REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATIOP 001.000.239.200 277.0( Total : 277.0( 253253 7/14/2022 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC S3-7371644 UNIT 93 - PARTS/ ROTOR & BRAKE UNIT 93 - PARTS/ ROTOR & BRAKE 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 232.3� 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 24.4- Total : 256.8( 253255 7/14/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200124873 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 46.3z 200202919 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 68.4E 200274959 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 24.4� 200422418 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 898.5, 200493153 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W Page: 28 Packet Pg. 142 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253255 7/14/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 29 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 42.8 , 200650851 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 77.5£ 200651644 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 825.3£ 200748606 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW o 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 21.5, R 200943348 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V o TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V a 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 46.0, Q 201103561 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI N N 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 38.9z r 201192226 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W c TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W y 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 23.0( . 201383270 CITY PARK GAZEBO CITY PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 24.4� y 201501277 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F E LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 @ 23.5' r 201532926 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- Q LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 163.6z 201563434 TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 38.3, 201582152 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 38.0� Page: 29 Packet Pg. 143 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253255 7/14/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 30 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 103.2z .. 201703758 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 36.9� 201711785 STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15C E STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 8.61 202077194 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE o FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE �a 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 478.9z o 202087870 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl L a LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl Q 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 156.4E N 202114484 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL N CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL T 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 84.2( c 202139655 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 y BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 29.1 , 202289096 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME a ; TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME m 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 66.5< E 202356739 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W U TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W r 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 36.5, Q 202421582 LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 60.2E 202499539 LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 547.1 E 202529186 STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ Page: 30 Packet Pg. 144 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 31 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253255 7/14/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 4,045.3£ 202529202 STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40( STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 113.1 E 202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 13,788.7E E 202579488 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 R STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 0 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 387.9 o 204292213 CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST �a CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST o L 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 125.7E a 204714893 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' Q STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' N 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 6.2z N 204714927 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 T STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 c 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 162.3' N 204714935 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 E STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 88.5" 204714943 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 y STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 19.2� U 204714950 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 r STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 Q 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 138.0- 205184385 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 27.0, 205307580 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 127.2E 220547582 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE Page: 31 Packet Pg. 145 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253255 7/14/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 253256 253257 7/14/2022 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 220792758 221593742 221732084 222398059 222704272 222818874 4829 7/14/2022 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER June 2022 7.4.b Page: 32 PO # Description/Account Amoun TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 42.4E TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 78.1 , TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 70.5� VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 0 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 101.8 1 SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY o 22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet - L Q- a 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 78.7E Q WWTP: 6/4-7/5/22 FLOWMETER 10 6/4-7/5/22 FLOW METER 2400 HIG N N 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 23.7z r DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A) c Decorative Lighting 115 2nd Ave S / y 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 25.6z .E Total: 23,460.1E TU JUL-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPAI c JUL-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPAI E 001.000.39.528.00.41.50 76,390.8E � JUL-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPAI° 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 r 2,010.2E Q JUL-2022 COMMUNICATION DISPAI 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 2,010.2� Total : 80,411.4, Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 277.1 E Page: 32 Packet Pg. 146 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 33 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253257 7/14/2022 070167 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER (Continued) Total : 277.1E 253258 7/14/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 717.7z ui 103585 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 704.5E U 103586 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 605.1 £ o 103587 PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC 'R PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC 0 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,173.9( Q. 103588 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N Q CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 459.8� N Total : 3,661.3! r 253259 7/14/2022 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 4435282 WATER - SUPPLIES/ CURVED JAW c WATER - SUPPLIES/ CURVED JAW N E 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 420.u, 'M 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 44.1( Total : 464.1 t 253260 7/14/2022 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 22409 TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) U �a TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) Q 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 2,000.0( TOURISM PROMOTION - ARTICLE 1 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 4,600.0( Total : 6,600.0( 253261 7/14/2022 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 46534 EAC: WOTS POSTCARD PRINTING EAC: WOTS POSTCARD PRINTING 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 1,023.3( Page: 33 Packet Pg. 147 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 34 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253261 7/14/2022 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 107.4, Total: 1,130.71, 253262 7/14/2022 038315 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION US53323 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HP ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HP 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,661.9' 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 174.5( Total : 1,836.4' 253263 7/14/2022 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 277306 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 1,832.6E 277653 ROADWAY - 3 WAY TOP SOIL MIX ROADWAY - 3 WAY TOP SOIL MIX 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 247.1( 278053 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 361.4� Total: 2,441.21 253264 7/14/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 015295 WWTP: PO 855 PH 6 POWDER PILL PO 855 PH 6 POWDER PILLOWS & 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 115.8 , HACH Surcharge 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 6.3 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 41.2� 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 17.1, 035980 WWTP: PO 855 POWDER PILLOS 8 PO 855 POWDER PILLOS & GLASE 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 106.2, Glass Filter Page: 34 Packet Pg. 148 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253264 7/14/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 253265 7/14/2022 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 2060147 253266 7/14/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9910072022 253267 7/14/2022 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION 7-2022 253268 7/14/2022 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 122-374 7.4.b Page: 35 PO # Description/Account Amoun 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 12.7,' Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 13.3( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 13.8� um Total: 326.8f u UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI E UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 118.7 0 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 118.7, p UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI Q. 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 122.3 � Q Total : 359.91 N N C/A 442201730-00001 iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office T 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 35.1 , y Dayton St Stormwater Pump Station E 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 27.2- T Total : 62.1 c PMT 13 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC t PMT 13 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 25,626.1( m PMT 13 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC Q 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 2,563.0( Total : 28,189.1( TREE REMOVAL - MAPLE ST - MAR TREE REMOVAL - MAPLE ST - MAR 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 1,200.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 126.0( Page: 35 Packet Pg. 149 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 36 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253268 7/14/2022 067195 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS (Continued) Total : 1,326.0( 253269 7/14/2022 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 0059598-2588-5 WWTP: 6/2022 WASTE PICKUPS 6/2022 WASTE PICKUPS 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 154,531.8( ui Total: 154,531.8( m 253270 7/14/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 8204 DEV SVCS - STAFF BUSINESS CAR t U 250 Business Cards - Les Krestel (BL E 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 52.0( 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 5.4E 'R 8229 #10 WINDOW ENVELOPES FINANC o #10 Window envelopes - Qty 5000 Q. 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 486.8' Q 10.5% Sales Tax — 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 51.1, N Total : 595.41 le T 253271 7/14/2022 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000052285 E2207-I072 - LED ENHANCED STOF o E2207-1072 - LED ENHANCED STOF E 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 4,752.9- Freight 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 157.8' 10.5% Sales Tax t 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 515.6' Total: 5,426.31 253272 7/14/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, r Q TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 278.9" TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 278.9( 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 42.1 Page: 36 Packet Pg. 150 vchlist 07/14/2022 9:11:49AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253272 7/14/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 99 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 99 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.4.b Page: 37 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 144.7< 425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRAI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 47.5E 425-775-1344 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION E 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION M 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 118.6� Z 425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( o SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( R 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 64.4� o 425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCI L a LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIALACC Q 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.4E N 425-776-5316 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII N 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII T 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 118.9- c 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P y CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A E 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 144.7< 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI a ; LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI m 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.4E E Total : 1,292.0( M Bank total : r 715,727.6( Q Total vouchers : 715,727.6( Page: 37 Packet Pg. 151 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Engineering Protect Protect Title Protect Accounting Funding Number Number 175th St. SW Slope StabilizatioGA E21 FB c560 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 SWR e Pm EBFC 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR ffic Calming 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES 019 Waterline Overlay i043 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 1020 Guardrail Installations 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 STR E E0DB STR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STR ffic Calming i 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades E0A13 i047 STR a Q- a 1020 Waterline Overlay N N 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 STR T 1C c 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i062 STR U) 2021 Sewer E21 CC SWR E 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 STM Z 0 L 2021 Traffic Calming i056 STR a a� 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR y �022 Guardrail Program i073 2' c 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 STR a 072 Li 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 STR 22 Signal Upgrade m 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 STR 022 Traffic Calming Program WQ 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES L22 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 STR 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STR 2023 Sew r Pr E23CC i076 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM erl rog 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 STR 6th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 152 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Engineering Protect Protect Title Protect Accounting Funding Number Number 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 STR 76th Ave W at 212th S=Intersection Improvements E1CA c368 STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 STR aCurb Ramp Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 STR allinger Regional Facility Pre -Design Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 STR Ltywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 STR M Protected/Perg�psive E6AB Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 PRK Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR ayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 FAC Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR Ww—ay Walkway 9th Ave 1DA TR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 WTR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalizati Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th Lake Ballinger Associated Projects Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study = Mlle Creek Restoration Minor Sidewalk Program PDES (Students Saving Salmon) Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update 1VD Slope Repair & Stabilization Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvem r Perrinville Creek Recovery Stu Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project Water Utility Replace Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacemeni E22CE i067 STR E4FD c436 STM E4GC c461 SWR B a W S� E6DD i017 STR E7FG 11mo EONA s025 GF m105 ents E20FC c552 STM 028 TM E22GA c566 SW R Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 WTR EOFB c547 STM a Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 153 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Protect Title Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project I Sewer Replace Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project Concrete Regrade & Drainage Engineerinq Proiect Number F21FD Protect Accounting Funding Number c563 E22FA c567 STM OG E21 GA c559 SW R Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21G13 c562 SWR eaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA STM SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th_ E22CG i069 STR SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES E 2 mwater AL AL E6FD Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 STR nds reserve Policies Study s029 i a Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 PRK Q- a Eaterfront Development & Restoration (Design) N Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA Pillow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration 47F Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades Yost Park Infiltration Facility EOJB E22JB E21FA m103 PRK c435 T s026 WTR m 160 WTR c556 PRK Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 154 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Engineering Protect Protect Title Protect Accounting Funding Number Number L020 Guardrail Installations EOAA 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 STIR EM i048 STIR Js 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 STIR 020 Waterline Overlay - 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program ir i049 STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 STIR Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA , c546 STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project E0F13 c547 al Sewer Replace iA Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 NOR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 livic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 F6th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 1 CA= c368 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave Overlay (196th 6 # SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction7Fprovements c552 STM E ° WTR ° 0 L 0. PRK Q N N GF T STIR STIR STR 2021 Traffic Calming E21AA i056 STIR kQ21 Guardrail Installations TR 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 STIR 2021 Waterline Overlav Progra E21 CB 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 SWR Stormwater Overlay Program Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 STIR F021 Pedestrian Task Force Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 PRK 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization M c560 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM Phase 3 Storm Repla Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 STM Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project did c559 V1 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SWR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EEMWVV-Tw Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 155 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) 7.4.c Engineering Protect Protect Title Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 STIR 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 STIR 2022 Guardrail Progrw E22AC 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 STIR 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 STIR �022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD Xio T" Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 STIR �Iwy 99 Revitalizatiok Stage 4 (224th-220th) S E c� SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 STIR 022 Pedestrian Safety progr ° Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 STM M L a Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB Q- a Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 SWR N Lhase 13 Waterline Replacement Project c565 r WTI r Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR c �s res Gies E22NA UTILITIES a� 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES E 023 Overlay Prograrr Z 0 L 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR a 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC a� y D 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM Willq&reek Daylighting/&onds Marsh Restoration STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects �et Stormw Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab' Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating standard Details Updates' Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization otected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion Minor Sidewalk Program tormwater Comp pdate Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E4FD c436 STM STM E4GC c461 SWR E5GB s011 SWR E51KA c473 WTR solo UTILITIES E6AA s014 STIR E6DD i017 STIR E6GB c488 SWR Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 156 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Engineering Protect Protect Title Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Ltywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM NPDE Saving Salmon) 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR aterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 PRK aterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design m103 220th Adaptive E8AB i028 STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements E8CA , i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th E8CC i031 STIR E Ramps E8DB STR 2019 Storm Maintenance Project E8FC c525 STM 019 Sewerline Replacement Project E8GA SWR i 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement E8JA c523 WTR a Q- a 1019 Utility Rate & GFC Update UTILITIES N N 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 STIR r F019 Waterline Overla WTR c Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 STIR a) Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9FA s022 STM E9MA c502 FAC Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 157 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.4.c Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1CA c368 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E41FE c455 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Funding STM STR STIR STM STM FAC STM SWR WTR WTR SWR PRK WTR FAC SWR WTR STM PRK PRK STM STM SWR WTR PRK STM PRK WTR SWR STM WTR SWR STM STM WTR SWR STM STIR ui m z U E U 0 R 0 L Q Q Q Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 158 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.4.c Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 CB i059 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 Funding STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR SWR STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ui m z U E U 0 R 0 L Q Q Q Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 159 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.4.c Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SW R 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 STM Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 PRK OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB s0l l SWR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 STR Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 STM 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 STM 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STR Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GF Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES ui m z U E U 0 0 L Q Q Q Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 160 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.4.c Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1 CA c368 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Funding FAC FAC GF PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ui m z U E U 4- 0 R 0 L Q Q Q Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 161 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.4.c Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E91DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Funding STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR ui m z U E U 0 R 0 L Q Q Q Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 162 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.4.c Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 SW R 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SW R Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB s011 SWR Standard Details Updates ESNA s010 UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR ui m z U E U 4- 0 R 0 L Q Q Q Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 163 7.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Administrative Services Job Descriptions Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History Currently, in the Administrative Services Department we have Accounting Specialist positions who have responsibilities in Utility Billing, Payroll, and Accounts Payable/Receivable. We have one person who does Payroll, one person who does Accounts Payable/Receivable, and two who do Utility Billing. Each job has a job description written specifically and uniquely for that job. All three of the positions are Non- exempt, members of AFSCME Council 2, and are at the same pay grade. All three positions, while not at all identical, do share similar characteristics as far as the skills and knowledge required to do the job. However, because each position has a Job Description written uniquely and specifically to the tasks of that job, we are unable to benefit from any cross -training, and coverage for one another is extremely limited when someone is out of the office. Staff Recommendation Our recommendation is to approve the "Proposed" job description that is attached. If the four people who are currently in siloed job descriptions can move into this combined job description, it will make workload management and work coverage much more efficient. We do not recommend making any changes at this time to the work that the people in these positions are currently doing. The intention is to provide more flexibility in the future. Attachments: Current Acct Spec Descriptions Proposed Acct Spec Description Packet Pg. 164 7.5.a City of EDMONDS Washington Department: Bargaining Unit: Revised Date: 0� k:btil Accounting Specialist - Utility Billing Administrative Services Pay Grade: NE-9 AFSCME Council 2 FLSA Status: Non -Exempt May 18, 2021 Reports To: Deputy Director Administrative Services POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, performs skilled technical accounting assistance in assigned area of utility billing; reconciles, audits, and enters various data into financial tracking system; generates and maintains a variety of routine reports related to utility billing; processes and maintains customer utility payments and accounts; assists customers with account inquiries and researches and indentifies account issues as needed; may reconcile and balances cash and prepares cash deposits; assists customers at the counter or via phone/email; sends notification for collection of monies for current and delinquent accounts, responding to public and departmental requests; serves as back up to payroll and utility billing functions and performs various clerical functions as assigned. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. lncumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, positi017-specific duties. Receives, processes and receipts customer utility payments from the drop box, PO Box, daily mail, uploaded web payments, and bank remittance payments. Establishes and maintains utility billing records, researches, and identifies utility account issues and provides assistance. Prepares and mails utility bills to customers for appropriate services. Prepares and mails delinquent notices and letters and notifies commercial accounts as needed. Dispatches staff for turn-on/off, reread, or related services; prepares related documentation. • Operates remote radio dispatch equipment. ■ Prepares and maintains a variety of files, records and reports related to permits, customers, senior discounts, rates, consumption, and others as assigned. • Develops annual meter reading schedule, and reviews business licenses for proper coding. • Prepares and maintains a variety of files, records and reports related to permits, customers, senior discounts, rates, usage, and others as assigned; operates a computer to enter data into appropriate software systems. • Reviews City ordinance for new annexations and prepares documents for new accounts; collects monies, maintains daily cash drawer, balances cash drawer at the end of the close of the business day and takes deposits to the bank. Assists with budget and CAFR preparation. • Responds to telephone inquiries and assists customers at front counter. • Coordinates the front counter, signs for, receives and distributes all shipments for departments. e Refers customers to correct department. Accounting Specialist —Utility Billing Last Reviewed: 10/01/2021 Last Revised: 05/18/2021 Packet Pg. 165 7.5.a 2 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Accounting Specialist — Utility Billing • Opens and distributes mail for the Finance Department, communicates with various City departments, vendors, and service providers to exchange information and coordinate activities. • Coordinates with public works personnel regarding customer accounts and related issues. • Reviews City ordinances for new annexations and prepares documents for new accounts. • Processes solid waste tax checks, payments for rent and leasehold payments and serves as backup for other accounting specialist functions. Required Knowledge of: • Operational characteristics, services, and activities of assigned area responsibility including the following: payroll and benefits, accounts payable/receivable and utility billing. Basic accounting and bookkeeping principles and practices. Basic office assistant/clerical support principles and practices in area of assignment. Computer hardware and automated accounting/financial systems. • Techniques in data verification and data entry and proper coding of documents. Federal, state, city and departmental policies and procedures affecting assigned work. Financial record keeping practices. • Filing systems and document retention. • Principles of customer service and public relations. Research methods and report preparation. Basic mathematics principles and practices. • Effective communication principles and practices including oral and written communication. • Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers, computer applications such as word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases. Proper telephone etiquette. • English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Principles of business letter writing. Required Skill in: • Utility billing methods, Eden, and BARS system. Providing excellent customer service to customers and visitors in area of assignment. Meeting deadlines and working with multiple projects in area of assignment. Maintaining and reconciling accounting records and in identifying and reporting discrepancies. Preparing a variety of informative reports in area of assignment. • Performing accurate bookkeeping, computing rapid and accurate mathematical computations, and maintaining associated accounting records. Gathering data and verifying information. ® Responding to inquiries or requests from employees, department management, outside agencies and the general public. • Working with equipment, tools, and materials required in area of assignment. Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. • Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work and in compiling and preparing spreadsheets. . Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside agencies, community groups and the general public. Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. Last Reviewed: 10/01/2021 Accounting Specialist — Utility Billing Last Revised: 05/18/2021 Packet Pg. 166 7.5.a 3of3 JOB DESCRIPTION Accounting Specialist — Utility Billing MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: High School Diploma/GED Certification and two years of accounting, bookkeeping, payroll, or related experience that includes tracking accounts, gathering, and verifying various financial data, general office experience, use of automated financial tracking systems, and maintaining records and files in a heavy customer service environment; preferably in a public sector environment; OR an equivalent combination of education, training, and experience. Required Licenses or Certifications: Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: Office environment. Constant interruptions. Physical Abilities • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment. Reading and understanding a variety of materials. • Sitting or otherwise remaining stationary for extended periods of time. Bending at the waist, reaching above shoulders, and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Accounting Specialist - Utility Billing Date: Date: Last Reviewed: 10/01/2021 Last Revised: 05/18/2021 Packet Pg. 167 7.5.a City of EDMONDS Washington ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST -Payroll Department: Finance Pay Grade: NE-9 Bargaining Unit: SEIU FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Revised Date: October 2012 Reports To: Finance Director POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, performs skilled technical accounting assistance in assigned area; reconciles, audits, and enters varlous data into financial tracking system; prepares various journal entries; generates a variety of routine reports. processes and maintains payroll and benefits; reconciles and balances cash and prepares cash deposits; assists various city departments, employees, third parties and vendors with payroll and benefit payment questions; serves as back up for accounts payable and accounts receivable; performs various clerical functions as assigned. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all dirties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. 1r70t)mbelit(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Processes payroll and benefits accurately and according to deadlines. • Reviews and ensures accuracy of employee data and compliance with established standards, policies and procedures. • Reconciles and remits benefit checks, and quarterly taxes and annual W-2's. • Uploads and reconciles daily cash payments; prepares daily bank deposits. • Reconciles miscellaneous monthly accounts, bank cash, special assessments, fixed assets, cemetery fund, sister city fund, control accounts and claims check reconciliation. • Prepares and processes other miscellaneous adjusting journal entries as needed. ■ Assists with budget and CAFR preparation and accounting reports as needed. • Logs deposits and refunds into appropriate system and balance totals to general ledger. • Prepares and maintains a variety of records and reports related to personnel, funds, payments and related activities. • Operates a computer and other office equipment as assigned; enters and maintains direct deposit information and other data into the personal computer as assigned. • Serves as backup for other accounting specialist functions. Required Knowledge of: • Eden and BARS system and payroll processing. • Operational characteristics, services, and activities of assigned area responsibility including: payroll and benefits, accounts payable/receivable and utility billing. • Basic accounting and bookkeeping principles and practices. • Basic office assistant/clerical support principles and practices in area of assignment. Accounting Specialist October 2012 Packet Pg. 168 7.5.a JOB DESCRIPTION Accounting Specialist Computer hardware and automated accounting/financial systems. Techniques in data verification and data entry and proper coding of documents. Federal, state, city and departmental policies and procedures affecting assigned work. Financial record keeping practices. • English usage, spelling, grammar, filing systems and document retention. • Principles of customer service and public relations. • Research methods and report preparation. Basic mathematics principles and practices. Effective communication principles and practices including oral and written communication. • Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications such as: word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases. • Proper telephone etiquette. • Principles of business letter writing. Required Skill in: Providing excellent customer service to customers and visitors in area of assignment. b Meeting deadlines and working with multiple projects in area of assignment. • Maintaining and reconciling accounting records and in identifying and reporting discrepancies. • Preparing a variety of informative reports in area of assignment. • Performing accurate bookkeeping, computing rapid and accurate mathematical computations and maintaining associated accounting records. • Gathering data and verifying information. • Responding to inquiries or requests from employees, department management, outside agencies and the general public. • Working with equipment, tools, and materials required in area o• f assignment. Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. nd other relevant software affecting assigned work and • Utilizing personal computer software programs a in compiling and preparing spreadsheets. • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside agencies, community groups and the general public. • Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: or related High School Diploma/GED Certification and two years of accounting, bookkeeping, payroll, experience that includes tracking accounts, gathering and verifying various financial data, generalsto ices experience, use of automated financial tracking systems, and maintaining records and files in a heavy service environment; preferably in a public sector environment; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience. Required Licenses or Certifications: Certified Payroll Professional (CCP) desirable. Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check. October 2012 Accounting Specialist Packet Pg. 169 7.5.a JOB DESCRIPTION Accounting Specialist WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: Y Office environment. a Constant interruptions. Physical Abilities Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment. Reading and understanding a variety of materials. Sitting or otherwise remaining stationary for extended periods of time. Bending at the waist, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Accounting Specialist Date: Date: October 2012 Packet Pg. 170 7.5.a City of EDMONCAS Washington ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST- Accounts Payable & Receivable Department: Finance Bargaining Unit: SEIU Revised Date: October 2012 Pay Grade: FLSA Status: Reports To: NE-9 Non -Exempt Finance Director POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, performs skilled technical accounting assistance in assigned area; reconciles, audits and enters various data into financial tracking system; processes accounts receivable/payable including: maintaining, reconciling and record maintenance for all City payables; prepares various journal entries; generates a variety of routine reports, reconciles and balances cash and prepares cash deposits; serves as back up for other accounting specialist function areas; assists customers at the counter or via phone/email and performs various clerical functions as assigned. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Processes accounts receivable and accounts payable. • Reviews city department payables for check processing; processes and prints weekly claims checks and enters accounts payables in financial computer system. • Prepares monthly reconciliations for accounts payable(s) and accounts receivable(s), Park and Recreation Security deposits, and refunds due and Bitco/Permit Trax. • Prepares accounts receivable invoices for leases and contracts. • Reviews accounts for past due items and sends out payment notifications and reminders. • Receives and enters new vendor requests for departments. Scans and attaches vendor identification documentation into the EDEN Financial System and prepares various journal entries for departments. • Assists departments with inquiries related to invoices and general ledger account coding. • Prepares various reconciliations and submits them for approval, including, but not limited to: the State Revenue Transmittal, TBD Revenue Transmittal, recurring journal entries, security deposits, refunds, permitting revenue and attorney fees. Assists with budget and CAFR preparation and accounting reports as needed. Balances the deposit fund. Logs deposits and refunds into appropriate system and balance totals to general ledger. Prepares and maintains a variety of records and reports related to personnel, funds, payments and related activities. Operates a computer and other office equipment as assigned; enters and maintains direct deposit information and other data into the personal computer as assigned. Serves as backup for other accounting specialist functions. Accounting Specialist October 2012 Packet Pg. 171 7.5.a JOB DESCRIPTION Accounting Specialist Required Knowledge of: • Operational characteristics, services and activities of assigned area responsibility including: payroll and benefits, accounts payable/receivable and utility billing. Basic accounting and bookkeeping principles and practices including the Eden and BARS reporting system. Basic office assistant/clerical support principles and practices in area of assignment. Computer hardware and automated accounting/financial systems. Techniques in data verification and data entry and proper coding of documents. Federal, state, city and departmental policies and procedures affecting assigned work. Financial record keeping practices. Filing systems and document retention. Principles of customer service and public relations. Research methods and report preparation. Basic mathematics principles and practices. Effective communication principles and practices including oral and written communication. Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers, computer applications such as: word processing, spreadsheets and statistical databases. Proper telephone etiquette. English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation. Principles of business letter writing. Required Skill in: Double entry accounting principles and standards and quadrant receipting system. Providing excellent customer service to customers and visitors in area of assignment. Applicable laws, rules, codes, regulations, policies and procedures related to payroll, taxes, benefits and other assigned areas. Meeting deadlines and working with multiple projects in area of assignment. Maintaining and reconciling accounting records and in identifying and reporting discrepancies. • Preparing a variety of informative reports in area of assignment. Performing accurate bookkeeping, computing rapid and accurate mathematical computations and maintaining associated accounting records. Gathering data and verifying information. • Responding to inquiries or requests from employees, department management, outside agencies and the general public. • Working with equipment, tools and materials required in area of assignment. • Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. • Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work and in compiling and preparing spreadsheets. • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside agencies, community groups and the general public. • Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. Accounting Specialist October 2012 Packet Pg. 172 7.5.a JOB DESCRIPTION Accounting Specialist MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: High School Diploma/GED Certification and two years of accounting, bookkeeping, payroll, or related experience that includes tracking accounts, gathering and verifying various financial data, general office experience, use of automated financial tracking systems, and maintaining records and files in a heavy customer service environment; preferably in a public sector environment; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience. Required Licenses or Certifications: Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Office environment. • Constant interruptions. Physical Abilities • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. • Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment. Y Reading and understanding a variety of materials. Sitting or otherwise remaining stationary for extended periods of time. Bending at the waist, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Accounting Specialist Date: Date: October 2012 Packet Pg. 173 7.5.b City of 1Y EDMONDS Washington' ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST Department: Administrative Services Pay Grade: Bargaining Unit: AFSCME FLSA Status: Revised Date: July 2022 Reports To: NE-9 Non -Exempt Deputy Administrative Services Director POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, perform skilled technical accounting assistance for the Administrative Services Department. This position reconciles, audits and enters data; generates routine reports; reconciles cash and prepares cash deposits; backs up other accounting specialist functions; assists customers in -person, via phone and/or email; and other clerical functions as assigned. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. Processes customer and vendor payments; Enters data to accounting system; Performs cash and/or account reconciliations; • Prepares and mails finance related correspondence; Responds to telephone inquiries and assists in -person customers; Assists with Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Budget preparations; Serves as backup for other administrative and accounting specialist functions. Position -Specific duties may include: Issuance and maintenance of City of Edmonds business licenses per the State Business License Service, for example processes business license applications, maintains license database and provides reports as required/requested; Issuance and maintenance of parking and special event permits; Enters payroll data and prints associated reports, processes personnel related data and enters into system for all City staff including new employees, seasonal and full-time staff; Processes accounts receivable and accounts payable transactions; Process department invoices for payment, both receivables and payables; Utility billing and related customer service. REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE OF: Operational characteristics, services, and activities of assigned area of responsibility which may include: Customer Billing, Accounts Receivable/Payable, Payroll, and/or Permitting; Basic office assistant/clerical support principles and practices in area of assignment; Basic understanding of general ledger and accounting principles. REQUIRED SKILL IN: Excellent customer service. • Basic computer skills including proficiency with word processing, spreadsheet and email applications. • Maintaining and reconciling accounting records. ® Effective oral and written communication. • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with internal and external customers. Packet Pg. 174 7.5.b JOB DESCRIPTION Accounting Specialist MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: High Schaal DipiomalGED Certification and two years of accounting, bookkeeping, payroll, or related experience arious financial data, general office experience, use of that includes tracking accounts, gathering and verifying v automated financial tracking systems, and maintaining records and files in a heavy customer service environment, preferably in a public sector environment; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience. Required Licenses or Certifications: Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: Office environment. © Constant interruptions Physical Abilities Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment. Reading and understanding a variety of materials. Sitting or otherwise remaining stationary for extended periods of time. Bending at the waist, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Incumbent Signature: date. Department Head: Date: Accounting Specialist Packet Pg. 175 7.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Update to Personnel Policy 3.10 Job Assignments Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: Human Resources Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson Background/History A portion of Policy 3.10 "Job Assignments" addresses the process for making changes to job descriptions. The process currently requires that all changes, including minor changes, to job descriptions be approved by Council. As Council has a processes that requires job description changes go to the Personnel Committee before forwarding to Council for final approval, and committees only meet once a month, the process for updating job descriptions can take more than 30 days. This proposed updated was reviewed by the Personnel Committee on 5/10/22 and recommended that it be advanced to full Council on consent. Staff Recommendation Approve the attached resolution updating policy 3.10 Job Assignments. Narrative At times job descriptions may need only minor adjustments that do not impact the duties or compensation of the position. These may be such things as removing equipment that the position no longer uses, changing the physical requirements, updating a reporting relationship if the position now reports to a new supervisor, or removing language that is no longer necessary but has the potential of creating issues of equitable access to applicants. These minor changes currently must go through the Council approval process. Due to the length of time these changes take for approval, they are often not made. This is usually due to the fact that job descriptions are reviewed when a position becomes vacant. At that time the need for these minor updates is usually identified. Due to the need to fill positions quickly, it is then not in the best interest of the City to take the possible 30 days to do minor updates prior to posting a position as this would delay filling the position in an already difficult recruiting environment. Human Resources is proposing a change to the policy that would allow these minor changes that do not impact duties, essential functions, or compensation be made administratively. This will allow the City's job descriptions to be kept up to date and still post positions in a timely manner. Attachments: DRAFT Resolution to Amend Personnel Policies 5.3.2022 Packet Pg. 176 7.6.a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, TO APPROVE A REVISION TO THE JOB ASSIGNMENTS POLICY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS PERSONNEL POLICIES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has adopted Personnel Policies, which include a provision related to employee job assignments and their related job descriptions; and WHEREAS, the current job assignments policy (Section 3.10 of the Personnel Policies) provides as follows: 3.10 JOB ASSIGNMENTS It is the supervisor's responsibility to maintain the employee's primary job assignments within the existing job description, until a revised job description is approved. Requests for revised job descriptions can be made by the Department Director to the Human Resources Office. Revised job descriptions, along with the appropriate pay grade, are subject to the Mayor's approval, before submittal to the Human Resources Office and City Council for their approval. ; and WHEREAS, the Human Resources Department has recommended a revision to the job assignments policy to create efficiencies in making minor revisions to job descriptions that do not impact the position's job duties, essential functions, or compensation; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and discussion, has determined that it is in the best interests of the city to approve the proposed revision to the Personnel Policies' job assignments policy; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. Section 2. Approval ofRevisions. The proposed revision to the job assignments provision of the City of Edmonds Personnel Policies, which is set forth in underlined text in Appendix A, attached hereto, is hereby approved as presented. Section 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect. Packet Pg. 177 7.6.a RESOLVED this day of 2022. APPROVED: MAYOR, MICHAEL NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 178 7.6.a APPENDIX A CHAPTER III RECRUITING, HIRING, AND PROMOTION 3.10 JOB ASSIGNMENTS It is the supervisor's responsibility to maintain the employee's primary job assignments within the existing job description, until a revised job description is approved. Requests for revised job descriptions can be made by the Department Director to the Human Resources Office. Revised job descriptions, along with the appropriate pay grade, are subject to the Mayor's approval, before submittal to the Human Resources Office and City Council for their approval. Minor revisions to job descriptions that do not impact the position's lob duties, essential functions, or compensation may be approved bV the Mayor without City Council approval. Packet Pg. 179 7.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Police Cadet Position Staff Lead: Chief Michelle Bennett Department: Police Services Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert Background/History The budget for this position has already been approved. We now need approval for the job description before we can post and hire. Staff Recommendation I am recommending this be sent to full council on the consent agenda for approval Narrative The budget for these positions where approved as part of the 2022 budget. When the police department went to post for this position, it was determined that the job description needed to be updated. HR advised with Police Department Command Staff on an updated job description which you see attached. We now need council approval so we can post and fill the positions. Attachments: Police Cadet Packet Pg. 180 7.7.a City of EDMONDS Washington Police Cadet Department: Police Pay Grade: H6 Bargaining Unit: Non -Represented FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Revised Date: 07/07/2022 Reports To: Admin Supervisor FTE Equivalent: .475 POSITION SCOPE: The purpose of this program is to provide an introduction into the varied careers related to the field of law enforcement. The cadet program is designed for college students and can double as a paid internship or can exist as continued employment throughout a person's college years. Exposure to law enforcement career related fields can enhance the educational process and studies of college students. Additionally, law enforcement officials can have the opportunity to view candidates for potential later employment. This exposure to law enforcement enhances community police relations and assists the police department with their existing and increasing workload. POSITION PURPOSE: Under the direction of the designated admin supervisor, this is a than training position that will work no more than 19 hours per week, which performs a number of clerical, and staff support functions and provides a broad overview of police department operations. Cadets will be thoroughly indoctrinated regarding performance expectations and consequences for poor or nonperformance. Full-time police department employees will supervise all work. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Assists clerks with reception/phone responsibilities. • Assists with computer data entry and retrieval. • Fingerprints applicants for gun permits, licenses, citizenship, etc. • Drives police vehicles from one location to another as directed. • Make deliveries to crime lab, SNOCOM, prosecutor's office, uniform store or other places as needed. • Assists with restocking of supplies Police Cadet Last Reviewed: 07/07/2022 Last Revised: 07/07/2022 Packet Pg. 181 7.7.a 2 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Police Cadet • Performs vehicle checks • Assists the Property Officer with evidence help and disposal. • Files reports as needed. • Assists animal control and parking enforcement as needed and maintains appropriate records. • Assists Community Engagement Specialist with community policing, crime prevention and Block Watch presentations. • Assist crime scene investigators and/or detectives as needed. • Performs related duties as assigned that are within the scope of the position classification Required Knowledge of: • Office procedures including typing, filing, data entry, and phone responsibilities. • Department policies and procedures. • Planning and organizing work. • Defensive driving. • Receiving and carrying out instructions from different supervisors. Required Skill in: • Operation of computer and office related equipment and machines • Typing MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: Enrolled in an accredited program at a community college, college, or university. Minimum 18 years of age. Required Licenses or Certifications: Must have a valid Washington state driver's license or ability to get one within one month of hire Must have a clean driving record and provide a driver's abstract prior to hire Full background investigation required, which may include a polygraph test and pre -employment drug test. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Indoor and outdoor work environment. • Office environment • Constant interruptions. Physical Abilities: Police Cadet Last Reviewed: 07/07/2022 Last Revised: 07/07/2022 Packet Pg. 182 7.7.a 3 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Police Cadet • Hearing and speaking to exchange information in person and on the telephone. • Dexterity of hands and fingers to operate a computer keyboard. • Seeing to read a variety of materials. • Reaching overhead, above the shoulders and horizontally, bending at the waist, kneeling or crouching to retrieve and store files. Hazards: • Contact with dissatisfied or abusive individuals Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Date: Date: IF 0 r 0 a. m 0 U a� v 0 a m. Police Cadet Last Reviewed: 07/07/2022 Last Revised: 07/07/2022 Packet Pg. 183 7.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Parking Enforcement Position Staff Lead: Chief Michelle Bennett Department: Police Services Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert Background/History The Parking Enforcement Officer position has previously been a .75 FTE. I am asking for it to be converted to a 1.0 FTE due to work load management. Staff Recommendation I am recommending this be sent to full council on consent agenda for approval. Narrative Due to the demand for parking enforcement by community members, as well as a growing list of events that take place throughout Edmonds, we are requesting the parking enforcement position be converted from a .75 to a 1.0 FTE. We expect the revenue received will more than adequately cover the additional cost. This assumption is taken from previous revenue numbers when the parking enforcement position was filled in 2020. According to Dave Turley, "The Parking Enforcement Officer is in the budget at a 0.75 FTE, the budgeted amount is about $42,000 per year. Moving to a 1.0 FTE would probably bring that amount up to around $85,000 per year." This was discussed at the July 12 Finance Committee meeting. A question was posed, as to why Animal Control can not assist with these duties. The demand for our Animal Control Officers (2) continues to rise in the community which has greatly reduced the amount of time they can spend addressing parking concerns. We were approached by another jurisdiction about them contracting with us for animal control services and unfortunately, we had to turn them down as we don't have the band width to address their needs as well as our own at current staffing levels. The parking enforcement officer will be responsible for enforcement throughout the city of Edmonds, that include areas outside the Edmonds Bowl. The schedule of this individual will include weekend work as needed/permitted. Attachments: FW_ parking and DV positions Parking and DV Question 2020 Parking Revenue Effect of Increased Positions Packet Pg. 184 7.8.a From: Bennett, Michelle To: Ehlert, Alexandra Subject: FW: parking and DV positions Date: Thursday, July 7, 2022 16:38:50 Attachments: innaae001.ona Parking and DV Ouestion.pdf Michelle D. Bennett Chief of Police Edmonds Police Department michelle.bennett@edmondswa.gov Office: 425-771-0200 Cell: 425-478-7207 Fax: 425-771-0208 10 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Main Line: (425) 771-0200 Service - Integrity - Respect - Stewardship From: Sharp, Debra <Debra.Sharp@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 16:12 To: Bennett, Michelle <michelle. ben nett@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov> Subject: FW: parking and DV positions Hi Chief Bennett, Dave asked me to reply to your question. Attached is the parking revenue for 2021 and 2022. I've included the pay range for the two full-time positions in question. The DV coordinator is at .5 and the parking enforcement officer is .75. The last page of the attached document includes the current budgeted positions. You will notice the DV coordinator position is budgeted with all the benefits. The ones based on a percentage of salary will change slightly but not much. The part-time parking enforcement officer does not include benefits. Lori from payroll said for medical to add about 40% of annual gross. I think the DV coordinator would give you a good start also. I hope this helps. Sorry it took a bit longer than you requested. I am at my desk if you have any questions —1368. Debra Sharp (she/her), CPA Accountant Packet Pg. 185 7.8.a City of Edmonds Ofc: (425)275-4510 From: Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:49 PM To: Sharp, Debra <Debra.Sharp@edmondswa.gov> Subject: FW: parking and DV positions Deb — can you get this info? I tried looking in the Budget folder but I'm having computer issues and can't view PDF files right now (1) From: Bennett, Michelle<michelle. ben nett@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:35 PM To: Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov> Subject: parking and DV positions Hi Dave - I was hoping that you could give me the total costs of a couple of things: What is the dollar cost of moving the parking enforcement position from .5 to a 1.0 FTE? What is the dollar cost of moving the parking enforcement position from .5 to a 1.0 FTE? Ion 2020, what was the revenue for our parking enforcement officer. Sorry for the short notice, but trying to get this information prior to the 1630 deadline for the personnel committee. Michelle @ Michelle D. Bennett Chief of Police Edmonds Police Department michelle.bennett@edmondswa.gov Office: 425-771-0200 Cell: 425-478-7207 Fax: 425-771-0208 10 Packet Pg. 186 7.8.a 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Main Line: (425) 771-0200 Service - Integrity - Respect - Stewardship Packet Pg. 187 revstat.rpt 07/07/2022 2:52PM Periods: 0 through 13 001 GENERAL FUND Revenue Status Report City of Edmonds 1/1/2021 through 12/31/2021 Adjusted Year-to-date Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues 001.000.354.00.000.00 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 100,000.00 44,811.98 44,811.98 001.000.354.00.070.00 PARK / INDDISZONE 2,000.00 475.03 475.03 Total GENERAL FUND 102,000.00 45,287.01 45,287.01 Grand Total 102,000.00 45,287.01 45,287.01 7.8.b Page: 1 W H u_ Prct o Balance Rcvc O 55,188.02 44.81 0 O 1,524.97 23.7E 56,712.99 44.4( C O U c O N 56,712.99 44.4( d C O r N d 7 C� C al C Y L E L c.i Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 188 revstat.rpt 07/07/2022 2:52PM Periods: 0 through 13 001 GENERAL FUND Revenue Status Report City of Edmonds 1/1/2022 through 12/31/2022 Adjusted Year-to-date Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues 001.000.354.00.000.00 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 100,000.00 6,269.59 6,269.59 001.000.354.00.070.00 PARK / INDDISZONE 2,000.00 113.89 113.89 Total GENERAL FUND 102,000.00 6,383.48 6,383.48 Grand Total 102,000.00 6,383.48 6,383.48 7.8.b Page: 1 W H u_ Prct o Balance Rcvc O 93,730.41 6.2-1 0 O 1,886.11 5.6f 95,616.52 6.2E C O U c O 95,616.52 6.2E d C O r N d 7 C� C al C Y L E L c.i Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 189 7.8.b Police Non -Commissioned 12022 Rates) Grade Minimum Maximum Animal Control / Ordinance Enforcement Officer NE-10 62,220 79,404 Community Engagement/Crime Prevention Coordinator NE-11 65,328 83,376 Domestic Violence Coordinator NE-10 62,220 79,404 Pa rt Ti me Ad m i n istrative Ass ista nt NE-6 51,180 65,3M Pa rt Ti me Pa rki ng Enforcement Off icer NE-6 51,180 65,3M Police Services Assistant NE-7 53,748 68,592 Property Off icer/Eviden ce Tec h n ic ia n NE-9 59,256 75,612 Sen ior An i ma I Control Off icer NE-11 65,328 83,376 Senior Rol ice Services Assistant NE-8 56,424 72,024 yes 1 1 unfilled yes yes 1 yes yes 0.50 yes yes 0.50 yes yes 0.75 .75 unfilled yes yes 3 yes yes 1 yes yes 1 yes yes 3 1 unfilled yes a Packet Pg. 190 7.8.b pyBudDet 7/7/2022 3:30:04PM Position Budget Detail Report City of Edmonds Model: 2022 Date Range: 01/01/2022 thru fiscal 2022 Page: 1 Thru End 2022 Fund : 001 Program : 000 Department : 41 0809/001 DV COORDINATOR .50 Position H 2890 JILL A SCHICK LL o Wages 39,696.00 T- Premiums: acc 408.00 0 .r Premiums: Ig1 792.00 N Benefit: da -- LEOFF/POLICE SUPPORT (E) 349.68 Benefit: 10 -- Cigna Group Insurance 26.64 L Benefit: lb -- Cigna Group Insurance 194.64 m Benefit: ma -- LEOFF/POL SUPPORT (E) 4,962.36 G Benefit: mebt -- MEBT 2,340.96 () Benefit: medcr -- MEDICARE 593.04 >_ Benefit: pens -- PENSION 5,259.12 0_ Benefit: pfml -- PAID FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE 81.84 N O Benefit: va -- LEOFF/POL SUPPORT (E) 57.36 d Total for 0809/001 DV COORDINATOR : 54,761.64 c 0814/001 PART TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT .75 Position O r Unoccupied Position ayi Wages 39,348.00 CY Benefit: fica -- Social Security 2,439.60 Benefit: medcr -- MEDICARE 570.60 Total for 0814/001 PART TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT: 42,358.20 C O Total for 001.000.41 : 97,119.84 C Total for 001.000 : 97,119.84 Y Total for 001 : 97,119.84 R d Grand Totals: 97,119.84 N E t cC Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 191 revstat.rpt 07/07/2022 4:55PM Periods: 0 through 13 001 GENERAL FUND Revenue Status Report City of Edmonds 1/1/2020 through 12/31/2020 Adjusted Year-to-date Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues 001.000.354.00.000.00 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 147,000.00 70,128.67 70,128.67 001.000.354.00.070.00 PARK/INDDISZONE 2,500.00 1,091.06 1,091.06 Total GENERAL FUND 149,500.00 71,219.73 71,219.73 Grand Total 149,500.00 71,219.73 71,219.73 7.8.c Page: 1 ul H Prct LL Balance Rcvc R O r 76,871.33 47.71 N C O 1,408.94 L 78,280.27 47.6z d C O U a 0 78,280.27 47.6z N O d r Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 192 7.8.d This schedule is to show the effects of increasing the DV Coordinator position from 0.5 FTE to a 1.0 FTE, the Parking Enforcement Officer from 0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE, both in the Police Department, and approving a new 1.0 FTE position for a Public Records Assistant in the Administrative Services Department. Also to show the effect of adding another 1.0 FTE for a Public Records Specialist in the Police Department. Current Annual Proposed Annual Effect on 2022 Budget for Budget Actual - Assume Salaries & (Approximate) at 4 Months of Department Job Description Current Status Benefits 1.0 FTE Employment Police Dept. DV Coordinator Budgeted at 0.5 at Step 7 $ 54,762 $ 107,179 $ 35,726 Police Dept. Parking Enforc. Officer Budgeted at 0.75 at Step 1 42,358 70,826 23,609 Subtotal, Police Dept. 97,120 178,006 59,335 Admin. Srvcs. Public Records Assist. New position, not in budget, assume Step 1 - 73,807 24,602 Total Combined $ 97,120 $ 251,813 $ 83,938 Effect on 2022 1.0 FTE Cost of Actual - Assume (Currently Additional 1.0 4 Months of Approved) FTE Employment 1 FTE is approved in the budget, PD Police Dept. Public Records Spec. is asking for a second position, assume Step 3 $ 92,599 $ 92,599 $ 30,866 Packet Pg. 193 7.9 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Oktoberfest Special Event Agreement Staff Lead: Shannon Burley Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Shannon Burley Background/History The Council authorizes Event Agreements on behalf the City of Edmonds. In 2021 the special events of Summer Market, SpringFest, Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July, Taste Edmonds and the Classic Car Show all took place, Oktoberfest was postponed for a second year due to the pandemic. Council has previously authorized the 2022 Summer Market, SpringFest, the Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July Celebration, Taste Edmonds and the Classic Car Show. On July 12, 2022 the Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed this Oktoberfest Event Agreement and recommended its placement on the Consent Agenda. Staff Recommendation Staff recommendation is the City Council approve the Event Agreement between the City of Edmonds and the Edmonds Rotary Club for 2022 Oktoberfest (attached). Approval on consent will authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Narrative After having to cancel the event two consecutive years due to COVID the Edmonds Rotary Oktoberfest Family Festival plans to return to the Frances Anderson Center Field on Friday, September 23, 2022 and Saturday, September 24, 2022. This is family friendly community event and fundraiser featuring live music, food trucks, kids activities, pet parade, beer garden featuring German beer and a 5K Fun Run/Walk. The event is free and open to the public. The 5K features includes minor road closures, some temporary parking closures and assistance by two Edmonds Police Officers for major intersection crossings. Details for the race can be found in the agreement to include a traffic control plan, race map with course monitor placement and plans to notify the public and any impacted residences. The contracts were reviewed and approved by the City's internal team (Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services, Development Services, Human Resources (risk management) and Economic Development Departments) and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Further, the Agreement requires that the Rotary follow all guidelines set forth by the State of Washington and the Snohomish County Health Department and abide by the South County Fire festival guidelines. In the July 12, 2022 Parks and Public Works Committee meeting Council requested that the City evaluate Packet Pg. 194 7.9 potential options to increase downtown parking on event days. This evaluation is ongoing and includes consideration for all large festivals. Attachments: 2022 Oktoberfest Event Agreement Packet Pg. 195 7.9.a EVENT AGREEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS ROTARY CLUB September 23-24, 2022 The following is an agreement ("Agreement") between the CITY OF EDMONDS (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and the EDMONDS ROTARY CLUB (hereinafter referred to as the "Rotary") (collectively, the "Parties"). WHEREAS, the Edmonds Rotary Club has in the past conducted a public event known as "Edmonds Rotary Oktoberfest" (hereinafter referred to as the "Event") and proposes to do so again in 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Event will enhance tourism and promote economic development, as well as providing an opportunity for good clean fun to its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the considerations the City provides are more than adequately recompensed by the promises of the Edmonds Rotary Club and the public benefit to be derived from this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, covenants, conditions and performances set forth below, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Responsibilities of the City (certain Rotary obliLations included). 1.1 The City will provide use of the Playfield, and the Bandshell at the Frances Anderson Center and 8th Avenue between Main Street and Dayton Street (See Site Map at Exhibit A & Traffic Control Plan at Exhibit B) and use of sidewalks and portions of city streets for a 5K race (see race map in Exhibit C) (hereinafter referred to as the "City -Provided Site") for use as the venue for Oktoberfest (hereinafter referred to as the "Event"), and agrees to the following: 1.1.1 No Parking Signs placed on the West Side of 8th Avenue and on Dayton for dumpster delivery by Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 8:00 a.m. 1.1.2 The Event setup on the Frances Anderson Playfields and 8t1i Avenue will begin on Friday, September 23, 2022 at 8:00 a.m.; barricades, ADA and loading zone signs to be in place by 8:00 a.m. 1.1.3 The Event will run from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Friday, September 23, 2022 and 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 24, 2022. The 5K race will begin at 10:00 am and conclude at 11:30 am. 1.1.4 The Frances Anderson Playfield and Bandshell will be used for the stage, beer festival, events and craft booths. The section of 8th Avenue described above will be utilized as an area for food concessions and eating tables. 1.1.5 The race will begin and finish on 8th Avenue between Main St. and Bell. Across from the Frances Anderson Center Playfields. Packet Pg. 196 7.9.a 1.1.6 All surfaces listed will remain available to the Rotary until final cleanup, to be completed by Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 12:00 p.m. 1.2 The City may sprinkle the field prior to the Event to reduce dust. The playfield irrigation system will be turned off by 8:00 a.m. on September 23, 2022. The Rotary agrees to cover the infield dirt only. 1.3 The City will provide up to fifteen (15) picnic tables and up to ten (10) garbage cans around the outside area. The Rotary will also provide crew members to assist with the moving and placement of tables and garbage cans. The Rotary will be responsible for emptying the trash cans. The City will supply backup trash bags. 1.4 The Rotary will provide a minimum of four (4) sheets of plywood to be used at the vehicle entrance location on the South Side of the Frances Anderson Playfield if the ground is soft and the area becomes muddy. 1.5 All use and configuration of structures, booths and other permanent or temporary facilities used in the Event must comply with the "Food Trucks and Special Events Standard" set forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Such structures, booths and facilities may be inspected and reviewed by the City Fire Chief, Police Chief, Building Official and the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director or their designees to determine whether the facilities in use comply with the provisions of Exhibit D and state and local law, as well as to ensure that no lasting or permanent damage will be done to any public facility or property. 1.6 Edmonds Fire Marshal may inspect the facilities prior to the opening to the general public on or before 2:00 p.m., September 23, 2022, as the Parties will agree, and note all potential problems. Prior to the opening of the Event, the Rotary will correct all problems related to fire safety. In the event that such problems are not corrected, the City may at its sole discretion cancel the Event or prohibit the attendance of the general public in certain areas, if in the opinion of the Fire Marshal and at the sole discretion of the City, any violation or other condition that threatens life, health or property has not been corrected. 1.7 Alcohol may be served, so long as the Rotary obtains all required state licenses and approvals to serve alcohol. These will be furnished to the City at least two (2) weeks prior to the Event. 1.8 The City will provide safety barriers at the following locations for street closures required to contain the City -Provided Site described in Paragraph 1.1 and identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: 1.8.1 8th Avenue at Main Street, to close 8th Avenue on both the North and South Sides of Main 1.8.2 8th Avenue at Dayton Street, to close 8th Avenue (local access only) 1.8.3 8th Avenue at Bell St, to close 8th Avenue Packet Pg. 197 7.9.a 1.9 The Rotary will work with the City to identify ADA parking stalls. The City will provide official handicapped parking signs. One load/unload space each will be marked on Dayton and Main Street. 1.10 The City may install Edmonds Oktoberfest street banners as provided by the Rotary at approved sites. The Rotary will obtain a Street Banner Permit and pay the required fee. 1.11 The City has the right to check the noise level of any amplified sound equipment or other source and require that the volume be reduced if it exceeds the safety limits recommended by the Seattle King County Department of Health or levels set forth in the ordinances of the City of Edmonds. 1.12 The City will provide and oversee police supervision of the Event under the command of the Chief of Police or his/her designee. Police staffing levels and fees to be paid to the City will be mutually determined by the Chief of Police, or his/her designee, and the President of the Rotary. 1.13 The City will supply a list of acceptable compostable and recyclable food ware items and of suppliers for the compostable items. The City will provide signage for the on - site collection containers, and any additional containers, if needed. 1.14 The Rotary must supply power as needed. There will be no temporary PUD hookups or power poles installed for this event, it will run off of generator power. A Rotary representative and a City Public Works representative will meet prior to September 9, 2022, to draw up an exterior electrical plan. The City Electrician will have final say in all electrical matters. (No ground penetrations are allowed unless authorized first by the City Electrician and City Parks Department). Any unauthorized ground penetrations may be subject to fine and/or damage cost recovery from the Rotary. 1.15 The Rotary is not authorized to fasten anything to the buildings, structures or trees. Doing so may result in damage cost recovery and/or fine. 2. Responsibilities and RiLrhts of the Rotary 2.1 The Rotary will operate the Edmonds Oktoberfest, and neither the Rotary nor any of its officers, agents or employees will discriminate in the provision of service under this Agreement against any individual, partnership, or corporation based upon race, religion, sex, creed, place of origin, or any other form of discrimination prohibited by federal, state or local law. 2.2 The Parties acknowledge that, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 70.160 RCW (herein after the "smoking ban"), smoking is prohibited in indoor areas, within 25 feet of vents or entrances and in outdoor areas where public employees of the City and employees of any vendor at the Event or of the Rotary are required to be. This general description of the provisions of the statute is included for the purpose of reference and is not intended to expand or contract the obligations created by the smoking ban. The Rotary warrants that it will comply with the smoking ban and will utilize the services and advice of the Snohomish County Health District in assuring compliance during the Event described in this Agreement. Packet Pg. 198 7.9.a 2.3 The Rotary agrees that the Edmonds Oktoberfest is a public event. The Rotary further agrees that areas constituting the City -Provided Site that are covered under this Agreement, including but not limited to public rights of way, streets, sidewalks, parks, parking lots, and gardens, are traditional public forums. As a result, the Rotary will permit citizens attending events open to the general public at the City -Provided Site during the Event to exercise therein their protected constitutional right to free speech without interference in a designated free speech zone that does not violate fire and ADA codes. 2.4 Chapter 6.80 of the Edmonds City Code ("Plastic Bag Reduction") restricts the use of single -use plastic checkout bags. The restrictions do not apply to plastic bags used to carry out cooked food or provided solely for produce, bulk food or meat. The Rotary will encourage its vendors to comply with the purposes of the ordinance by utilizing paper bags or encouraging the use of reusable totes whenever practicable. 2.5 Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 70.93.093, concerning event recycling, the Rotary will place clearly marked recycling containers throughout the Event area for the collection of aluminum cans, glass or plastic bottles and other recyclable materials from Event participants. The Rotary will be responsible for providing recycling, compost, and garbage collection and removal services (see also Section 2.6, below). 2.6 Pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 6.90 ("Noncompostable Food Service Containers Prohibition") and 6.95 ECC ("Single -Use Plastic Utensils — Prohibition"), which prohibit the use of non-compostable food service containers and single -use plastic utensils (such as plastic straws, stirrers and cutlery) at public events requiring a contract with the City, the Rotary will ensure that food vendors at this public event provide only compostable food service containers and utensils, as defined in Chapters 6.90 and 6.95 ECC, to Event participants. Aluminum and steel cans, plastic bottles and certain plastic cups that are accepted as recyclable continue to be acceptable for vendor use. The Rotary will provide for the on -site collection of compostable and recyclable materials from Event participants, using designated color -coded collection containers. The Rotary will ensure that on -site collection containers are serviced properly and continually during the Event. A Rotary representative will meet with the City's Recycling Coordinator or representative prior to September 10, 2022, in order to be educated on the 3-container system to maximize diversion of compostable and recyclable materials from the garbage, and the City will work to identify mutually agreed upon locations for food waste stations. These stations will be identified on Event maps and website. 2.7 The Rotary may in its discretion limit the participation of any vendor who produces duplication in order to adequately recognize limitations of space, failure to comply with applicable State or local health, liquor, or other requirements of law, and in order to provide an adequate and interesting diversity compatible with the recreation of the citizens of Edmonds. 2.8 The Rotary will be responsible for restoring the City -Provided Site to its original condition. A Rotary representative will meet with a member of the City's Parks and Recreation Department on September 22, 2022 to inspect the City -Provided Site to Packet Pg. 199 7.9.a document the "original" and "post event" conditions of the City -Provided Site and surrounding areas. 2.9 The Rotary will provide a sufficient number of portable sani-cans and wash stations. 2.10 The Rotary will be responsible for all required city and state permits. The Rotary will submit all required application(s) and fees(s) for the Street Banner Permits provided for by this Agreement. All permits will be arranged through a designated representative of the City. The Rotary is responsible for obtaining any necessary permits for serving alcohol on the premises from the state. 2.11 The Rotary will ensure that all booths/beer garden/wine garden have the necessary state permits for serving and selling alcohol. The Rotary agrees to make its best effort to prevent service of alcohol to minors, including partition of the beer garden and wine garden, posting security at the entrances of the beer garden and wine garden and checking identification in accordance with common practice. 2.12 The Rotary will obtain any copyright licenses necessary for presenting licensed live and recorded music. 2.13 The provisions of Chapter 5.05 of the Edmonds City Code ("Animal Control") apply to the City -Provided Site. ECC 5.05.060 prohibits dogs, whether on leash or off leash from being present on City playfields. The Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director will provide a temporary exemption to this prohibition and allow dogs to be on leash at the Event. The Rotary will ensure that: (a) dogs remain on leash or under other manner of restraint at all times while on the City -Provided Site; (b) dogs do not enter the playground area; and (c) all dog waste is removed from the site. The Rotary will notify Police of any aggressive dog behavior. The Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director retains the right to suspend this temporary exemption at any time. 2.14 Garbage service will be contracted and paid for by the Rotary. 2.15 The Rotary will provide a minimum of four (4) sheets of plywood to protect the grass at the entrance to the Event area in the event this area becomes muddy due to rain. 2.16 A minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the Event, the Rotary will contact Sound Transit's Construction Supervisor at Construction. Supervisor(d),commtrans.org to share road closure dates and times to allow for busses to be re-routed during the Event. 2.17 The Rotary will be responsible for clean-up of the City -Provided Site as follows: A. Restore all areas to their original condition. B. Pick up all trash and remove all items and equipment related to the Event by 12:00 p.m., September 26, 2022 (including grounds and buildings). C. Power wash the following: a. All paved food concession areas; and b. All pedestrian walkways/steps around amphitheater. Packet Pg. 200 7.9.a D. Install drain guards on all affected storm drains prior to the beginning of the Event, and remove them after clean-up is complete. Drain guards will be provided by the City. Power washed materials (litter, etc.) must be collected and disposed of and not pushed to adjacent areas. E. Pick up and remove all garbage to the size of a cigarette butt, debris, litter, equipment, and any and all other items made necessary by or used in the provision of the Event by 12:00 p.m., Sunday, September 25, 2022. F. Disposal of waste water will be according to the City policy using grease traps provided, cleaned, and picked up by the Rotary. 2.18 A final inspection of the Event area will be conducted by the City Parks Maintenance Division to determine if all areas are clean and returned to their original condition. 2.19 The Rotary will submit a cleaning/damage deposit of One Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($1,500.00) to the City prior to Tuesday, September 6, 2022. The deposit will be refunded to the Rotary if, upon inspection, all is in order, or a prorated portion thereof as may be necessary to reimburse the City for loss or cleaning costs. 2.20 The Rotary will pay the City Seven Hundred Fifty dollars ($750.00) for the use of the City -Provided Site prior to Tuesday, September 6, 2022, and will reimburse the City for the actual costs of supplies or services furnished by the City, unless otherwise established, within thirty (30) days of mailing of a final bill by the City. 2.21 The Rotary will provide a fire watch for all times the Event is open to the general public. The Fire Marshall or representative may inspect the City -Provided Site with the Rotary President, or designated representative, prior to 12:00 p.m. on September 24, 2022. 2.22 The Rotary will insure that: A. Kilns, barbecues, forges and other sources of heat will be insulated from turfed areas to prevent the heat from killing the grass and sterilizing the soil. All heat producing appliances will be approved by the Fire Department and may require conditions for their acceptable use (see exhibit D). Food vendor installations will be inspected prior to the Event opening. Tarps, tents, canopies and covers will be listed and labeled for flame resistance. B. Vehicles will only be allowed on turfed areas to load and unload, with adjacent streets used for parking during the Event. C. The Rotary will notify all individual residents of the affected areas of 8th Avenue and provide general notice to all the citizens of the closure of 8th Avenue. D. Tents are held down with sandbags and not stakes. 2.23 The Rotary will defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including attorney fees, arising from or in connection with the Rotary's performance, or nonperformance, of this Agreement, except to the extent that claims, injuries, Packet Pg. 201 damages, losses or suits are caused by the sole negligence of the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless will include a waiver by the Rotary of the immunity provided under Title 51 RCW, but only to the extent necessary to fully effectuate this promise. This provision will survive the termination and/or expiration of this Agreement. 2.24 The Rotary will provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the following insurance: General Liability insurance will be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 covering premises, operations, products -completed operations and contractual liability. The City of Edmonds will be named as an additional insured on the Rotary's General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured -Managers or Lessors of Premises Form CG 20 11 or an endorsement providing at least as broad coverage. The General Liability insurance will be written with limits no less than $2,000,000 each occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate. The insurance policy will contain, or be endorsed to contain, that the Rotary's insurance coverage will be primary insurance as respect the city of Edmonds. Any insurance, self-insurance, or self -insured pool coverage maintained by the city of Edmonds will be excess of the Rotary's insurance and will not contribute with it. In the event that the Rotary's employees and/or volunteers provide the service of alcohol at the event, the Rotary's General Liability insurance will also include host liquor liability coverage. However, if the Rotary contracts with a third -parry vendor or vendors to provide all service of alcohol, the Rotary will be responsible for obtaining a Certificate of Insurance from all vendor(s) confirming that the vendor(s) have Liquor Liability coverage, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per vendor. The City will be named as an additional insured on any third -party vendor(s)' Liquor Liability policies and copies of all endorsement(s) naming the City as an additional insured will be attached to the Rotary's Certificate of Insurance. The Rotary will provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the required insurance before using the premises described herein. Insurance will be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than ANII. 2.25 The Rotary agrees to the following general open hours for Edmonds Oktoberfest: Friday, September 23, 2022 4:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Saturday, September 24, 2022 12:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. The Rotary agrees to keep the hours of operation in the Beer Garden / Wine Garden within the following schedule: Friday, September 23, 2022 4:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Last call 9:30 p.m., no service after 9:45 p.m. Saturday, September 24, 2022 10:30 a.m. — 10:00 p.m. Last call 9:30 p.m., no service after 9:45 p.m. Packet Pg. 202 7.9.a The Rotary agrees to have the race start at 10:00 am with a goal of completion no later than 11:30 am. 2.26 The Rotary will provide any and all security services necessary during the night time hours (night time hours being defined as those hours which the Event is not in operation), sufficient to reasonably secure the area and facilities provided. The City will have no responsibility or liability for the provision of security services, nor will it be liable for any loss or damage incurred by the Rotary or the participants in the Event. 2.27 The Rotary will provide fence installation and removal at the Beer Garden / Wine Garden, if installing fence on 8th Avenue Rotary will ensure the fence runs along the center line of the street allowing for vehicle access on the East side of the street. 2.28 The Rotary is responsible for contracting with appropriate vendors for electrical power. No power is available at the Frances Anderson Center field and gasoline powered generators are not permissible. 2.29 The Rotary will arrange for a walk-through with the City Electrician and obtain approval for the accommodation of power and electricity needs. 2.30 All requests for additional services for, and concerns about, the Event will be directed by the Rotary President to the City's designated representative, the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Deputy Director, who may be contacted at 425-771-0230. 2.31 The Rotary will assume all responsibility for coordination of the 5K race, including but not limited to ensuring that the flow of traffic is not disrupted on City Streets that remain open. The Rotary accepts the condition of the 5K route as it currently exists. 2.32 The Rotary shall provide course monitors and flaggers as indicated in the traffic control plan (exhibit B). The Rotary shall pay for two Edmonds Police Officers to be stationed at the intersections identified a P on the traffic control plan to assist in helping runners safely navigate the course. 2.33 The Rotary shall provide advance notice to businesses and residents along the 5K route regarding the Event. Notification shall include, but not be limited to: event date, timeframe, route, traffic impacts/detours and contact information to obtain more information. 2.33 The Rotary shall make arrangements with a local newspaper to run a Neighborhood Traffic Alert no less than one week prior to the Event. The notice shall include the event contact, event date, time, route, and timeframe of expected impacts. 2.34 The Rotary will provide the "NO PARKING" signage to Public Works prior to September 16, 2022, and that the event organizer agrees to pick up and store the "No Parking" and "Road Closed" barricade signage at an agreed upon location for Public Works to recover on the following Monday. The Rotary should make contact with Chuck Haitt (425-771-0235) for quantity, configuration, and location of storage of the no parking signage. Packet Pg. 203 7.9.a 3. Miscellaneous. 3.1 Entire agreement, integration and amendment. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties relating to the rights and obligations created hereby, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, understandings, and agreements, written or oral, between the Parties. Any prior discussions or understandings are deemed merged with the provisions herein. This Agreement will not be amended, assigned or otherwise changed or transferred except in writing with the express written consent of the Parties hereto. Any action to interpret or enforce this Agreement will be brought before the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington, and the Parties agree that, as between them, all matters will be resolved in that venue. 3.2 Force majeure. The Parties will not be liable for failure to perform or delay in performance due to fire, flood, strike or other labor difficulty, act of God, act of any governmental authority, riot, embargo, fuel or energy shortage, car shortage, wrecks or delays in transportation, or due to any other cause beyond the Parties' reasonable control. In the event of delay in performance due to any such cause, the date of delivery or time for completion will be extended by a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of such delay. 3.3 Relationship between the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted to or in fact create an agency or employment relationship between the Parties. No officer, official, agent, employee or representative of the Rotary will be deemed to be the same of the City for any purpose. The Rotary alone will be solely responsible for all acts of its officers, officials, agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 3.4 Compliance with Laws. The Rotary in the performance of this Agreement will comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and ordinances, including all applicable public health and safety guidelines and all requirements of the federal government, the State of Washington, and the City related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The most recent information regarding the applicable state and federal guidelines and requirements relating to the COVID-19 pandemic can be found on the Washington State coronavirus response webpage at www.coronavirus.wa.gov and on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov. og_v. The Governor's Spectator Events COVID- 19 Requirements, which contains hyperlinks to related resources and any updates to its requirements, may be found at: https://www. govemor.wa. gov/sites/default/files/COVID 19%20Spectator%20Event%20Guidance.pdf . The Rotary will consult this information regularly during the course of the event to ensure that the latest guidelines and requirements are promptly implemented. 3.5 Non -Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 3.6 Termination. Each and every term and condition herein set forth and contained in this Agreement are expressly made terms, covenants, agreements and conditions, and a breach of any one of them by the Rotary will constitute a breach of this Agreement. In the event the Rotary fails to comply with any of the terms, covenants, agreements or conditions of this Agreement, or in the event the Rotary violates any local, city, county, state, or federal law, in connection with the Event, upon giving the Rotary twenty-four (24) hours' advance written notice, the City may terminate this Agreement. Provided, the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director may order the Rotary to cease operation of the Event hereunder immediately at any time should the Parks, Recreation & Packet Pg. 204 7.9.a Cultural Services Director determine that the Event is detrimental to public safety, health, or welfare. Such a determination may be made in relation to COVID-19 or to any other public safety, health or welfare issue. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all the rights, licenses, and privileges herein contained will be terminated, the Rotary will have no further rights hereunder, and the City may require the immediate removal of all property of the Rotary and its vendors from the City -Provided Site. DATED this day of 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS: EDMONDS ROTARY CLUB: Mike Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Libby Freese, Edmonds Rotary Club Treasurer Packet Pg. 205 Exhibit A: Site Map I Packet Pg. 206 7.9.a Sno-Isle Library May 2020 rn LU a Exhibit B Traffic Control Plan — Festival & Race EDMONDS ST Z W Q 2 = O� II P MAIN S [Water Barricades and Barricade Signs ided by Public Works. Closed to all traffic. Frances Anderson Anderson Center Field Center Water Barricades and Barricade Signs © © °AYTON ST provided by Public Works. Local Access Only U) W Q 2 MAPLE ST co W 2 I— d� ALDER ST WALNUT ST ■ Road Closure Barricade Reserved for ADA A Parking Signs Food Trucks West side only Packet Pg. 207 7.9.a LIP 3 Rg N ^+ N p� � � a 1 7 N anV 419 m mTII 3 a O 0 N (p ID0 a C]a O 0 0 U7 O C- 4 4 Oh 8 U t➢ CD Q V in GY O 'tom 13_ Cr 1 iJ O O � 'fir W m Q� C �kg fG @ Y/ ro n w "m -�. ro n m m o, N V y19 3f4 Pt3 f-3 °o K m �n v x O 2 a U a � A x x m x as C,-1 5 m10 G1 [n v f7 *c C T La '3 Q o m>>o° imam a �a � n � I r�S a x Q ` tt � r a� -moo a,o is �A'D as r0 =F m 'a (P n N b 7 n N N S N Co CP @- N [nA[nANC..�z�sa[n n� �.° N O > @ Z ° z rnn m m@ N 1J 6hlf {list i �' T o z $$.P z$ z _ .w4o . � C` 91 .N-t m Cry m � _ Ch S° D o m° o S xi m>> 4 4 o- o o. o S o o _�'n�nn' > C �C z CO a [O Cfi µ 4 µ W µp m m S [ S-. ET R C S 7 S= S S A (D a �Na a i 0 0 �' A wA[P[PC� [n CnCnAm N 0 a Z 0 O1 W a g o a o o Coo o e } CA �s N -c ❑ 3 03 rnn ,mapa rl O Nan d' anUir, 'a rT � . a A A Z c a 6 ow �� 0 p Co> a A z� C7� g{A N al z 6 ' n--"o Cm� n9 9m ¢y err L+ S F �i d��1 Co - n t� dap n CD 3: ql -00 -j ro rrt -t y� ��o � w Cow o �. � m ^3' � � m n NId41LL w MhAvl�l 4F G - N d L Q C d W .g d Q. Co N d O Q L tm Q C CD > W (n O O N N O N C d t 0 m a Packet Pg. 208 7.9.a C 0'1 m C N p wT rqr� a�2 � N H 0 �m na w � d w Q �7 a N � C a m 9 'd 2 C� r5 N antl 439 E-401, w r] SY Exhibit C Race Map m � N N d '� T N w •CrA •n _ n _c m N a 7 �l Z1 � P+ OL m iD M 71 m 02 p 02Z �Q 0 O fD' O G O COLN G :32 =� �� N ��a 3 3 3 3 �. q ?� ; � 0 03Q 1 Og 1, 1.0Q o° O3° O° O W `� v [+7mA0� Co Co Co O 3 `@C U7 U7 U7 f� N P 6 n CL V imL 3 (D 3 NN 9u v Q Cr cn X am 4100 0 a r 4 - t -- o IQ ' m m ',w 5 2 N C N env u1e - m @ Q @ 0 @ C ... f-. Q Q� CO D- y 0 m @ N GAV 6 4° o 3 o a N O@ ^E =@ D @ Q@ D m Z Cj - L co [' 3i = �i r' it W OQ r�i LO � r n� @ Zi m @ m co m @ kn w @ T. N dCd v � { x 4 6 H a rn V+ n y = v 1 u N Id TLL 121h A vQ Ni N an Q Packet Pg. 209 7.9.a Exhibit D FOOD TRUCKS AND SPECIAL EVENTS STANDARD BUSINESS LICENSE ❑ All food trucks are required to obtain a business license unless they are part of a special event in which case they are covered under the special event. FIRE LANE ❑ A MINIMUM 20-foot Fire Lane must ALWAYS be maintained for emergency vehicle access ❑ Unobstructed access to fire hydrants and FDCs shall always be maintained. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining immediate access for rendering aid or to fire protection equipment or fire hydrants (IFC 507.5.4) TENTS AND OTHER MEMBRANE STRUCTURES ❑ All tents, canopies, and other membrane structures erected shall meet the requirements of the current edition of NFPA 701 and the IFC Section 3103 and 3104 and shall be labeled fire resistive. Exceptions are: a. Limited in size to 120 square feet; b. Occupancy is limited to 10 persons or less; c. Minimum of 12 feet seperation between the canopy and the building (including any overhang or canopy); and Cl. No open flame or cooking is associated with the use of the canopy. ❑ Tents shall be 400 square feet or less, or an additional permit maybe required. The aggregate area of multiple tents placed side by side shall not exceed 700 square feet without having a 12-foot fire break. Break may be reduced to 10 feet with the approval of the fire official. Smoking shall not be permitted in tents or membrane structures. (IFC 3104.6) ❑ Tents or membrane structures and their appurtenances shall be adequately roped, braced and anchored to withstand the elements of weather and prevent against collapsing. Documentation of structural stability shall be furnished to the fire code official on request. SOUTH COUNTY FIRE 12425 Meridian Avenue South, Everett, WA 98208 (425) 551-1264 I Prevention@SouthSnoFire.org SERVING THE CITIES OF • BRIER • EDMONDS • LYNNWOOD • MOUNTLAKE TERRACE Packet Pg. 210 7.9.a ❑ Maintain a minimum of 20 feet separation between rows of vendor booths, and a minimum of 20-foot-wide emergency apparatus access from parking area into vendor and stage area. HOOD AND FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ❑ A MINIMUM OF ONE 2A10BC PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER is required in all trucks and food vendor tents, with current annual inspection/service tag attached, and appropriately mounted. KEEP FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ACCESSIBLE AND CONSPICUOUS with no more than 75 feet of unobstructed travel distance. ❑ Trucks and food vendor tents with deep fat fryers also require a Class "K" rated fire extinguisher with current annual inspection/service tag attached. ❑ Hood suppression systems must have current inspection documentation (within 6 months) and shall be UL300 Compliant. ❑ Hood suppression systems must have current cleaning inspection documentation. ❑ NO CANDLES or open flame devices like Tiki torches shall be allowed. ❑ NO FLAMING FOOD shall be allowed. ❑ ALL COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS shall be kept away from heat sources. ❑ NO COOKING APPLIANCES/HEAT SOURCES will be within physical reach of the general public. ❑ COOKING OIL STORAGE CONTAINERS within mobile food preparation vehicles shall have a maximum aggregate volume not more than 120 gallons (454 L), and shall be stored in such a way as to not be toppled or damaged during transport. ELECTRICAL CORDS ❑ Minimum size 12-2 with ground UL approved outdoor rated from power feed source, 14-2 with ground UL approved is allowed elsewhere. ❑ All cords shall be free of splices, cuts or breaks in outer sheathing. ❑ UL or other approved Strip Plugs with integral circuit breaker are the only allowed power tap/adapter. ❑ See "Generators" below South County Fire — Food Trucks and Special Events Standard 2021 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 211 7.9.a RUBBISH ❑ Keep combustible rubbish in closed containers. ❑ Cardboard boxes are rubbish, not rubbish containers. ❑ Rubbish containers larger than 40 gallons must be labeled "Fire -Resistive". FUEL USE AND STORAGE ❑ All tanks/cylinders (whether in use or storage) must be secured to avoid falling and damaging the valve assembly. ❑ Storage tanks/cylinders must remain upright, so pressure relief valve is in vapor space. ❑ MANUAL SHUTOFF VALVES ON GAS LINES ARE REQUIRED AT THE POINT OF USE AND AT THE SUPPLY. ❑ The maximum aggregate capacity of LP -gas containers transported on the vehicle and used to fuel cooking appliances only shall not exceed 200 pounds (91 kg) propane capacity. ❑ The maximum aggregate capacity of CNG containers transported on the vehicle shall not exceed 1,300 pounds (590 kg) water capacity. ❑ LP -gas containers installed on the vehicle and fuel -gas piping systems shall be inspected annually by an approved inspection agency or a company that is registered with the U.S. Department of Transportation to requalify LP -gas cylinders, to ensure that system components are free from damage, suitable for the intended service and not subject to leaking. CNG containers shall be inspected every 3 years in a qualified service facility. CNG containers shall not be used past their expiration date as listed on the manufacturer's container label. Upon satisfactory inspection, the approved inspection agency shall affix a tag on the fuel gas system or within the vehicle indicating the name of the inspection agency and the date of satisfactory inspection. ❑ No smoking in or around cooking/fuel use or storage areas GENERATORS ❑ No generators are allowed unless they are part of the food truck fuel system or fueled by LP/CNG. NO GASOLINE GENERATORS WILL BE PERMITTED. South County Fire — Food Trucks and Special Events Standard 2021 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 212 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Public Hearing BD2 Designated Street Front Interim Ordinance No. 4262 Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The City Council adopted Ordinance 4247 which imposed a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned properties that do not front on a designated street front as shown in Map 16.43-1. The moratorium was initially adopted for a 60-day period to allow the development of interim design standards for such properties. During discussions on the interim design standards, findings for the moratorium (Resolution 1490) and three subsequent extensions of the original moratorium (Ordinances 4253, 4254, and 4255), questions regarding uses in the BD2 arose, particularly with regard to residential only buildings on BD2 properties. Staff and the city attorney provided a memorandum to the City Council on the legislative history of the designated street front and demonstrated how multifamily only buildings may be permitted on BD2 properties outside of a designated street front. In adopting Resolution 1490 (findings for multifamily moratorium), a WHEREAS was added noting some councilmembers felt it was important to reconsider with the designated street front map should be extended. Ordinance 4255 extended the moratorium to allow staff time to analyze possible extensions of the designated street front. At the May 24, 2022 Council meeting, Interim Ordinance 4262 (Exhibit 1) was adopted which extended the designated street front in selection locations and removed ambiguities in the BD use table in ECDC 16.43.020. Staff Recommendation Adopt findings of fact for the continuance of Interim Ordinance 4262 as provided in the draft resolution in Exhibit 2. Narrative Public Hearing Pursuant to RCW 36.70A390 and RCW 35A.63.220, the City Council is required to hold a public hearing within 60 days of the adoption of an interim ordinance. Interim Ordinance 4262 set July 19, 2022 as the hearing date. The purpose of the hearing is to consider findings of fact on the subject of the interim ordinance and either justify its continuation or repeal the interim ordinance. A draft resolution is provided in Exhibit 2 for the continuation of Interim Ordinance 4262 while potential permanent changes to the designated are evaluated by the Planning Board and Economic Development Commission for a Packet Pg. 213 8.1 recommendation to the City Council. Planning Board and Economic Development Commission Review Schedule An introduction to the designated street front issue was presented to the Planning Board on June 8th and an introduction will be presented the Economic Development Commission (EDC) July 20th. The Planning Board and EDC are schedule to hold a joint meeting on the issue August 10th. The Planning Board is scheduled to hold a public hearing on September 28th after which they will likely forward a recommendation on a permanent ordinance to the Council. We recognize that there may be interest in conducting a more in-depth analysis of the designated street front, however, legal timelines for the interim ordinance and the comprehensive plan update do not align. If discussions on the designated street leads to a broader review of the designated street front throughout the entire downtown area, this discussion would best be held in conjunction with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update. Interim Ordinance 4262 Interim Ordinance 4262 implemented two changes to the BD2 code; extending the designated street front in Map 16.43-1 and clarified uses in Table 16.43-1. Map 16.43-1 The BD2 zone is identified as the Downtown Mixed Commercial zone in ECDC 16.43.010. Most of the BD2 zone requires commercial uses within the first 45 feet of the designated street front (ECDC 16.43.030.B.7). Any permitted use may be located on the ground floor outside of the designated street front (ECDC 16.43.030.B.7). Where properties do not front on a designated street front as shown in Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front from BD Zones, any permitted use is allowed including residential only buildings. With Interim Ordinance 4262, the designated street front map (Exhibit A in Interim Ordinance 4262) was extended is a few locations. The blue dotted areas are locations where the designated street front was extended while the solid blue are the currently mapped designated street fronts in Map 16.43-1. These were identified as areas for expansion based on Council comments and review of the legislative history of the designated street front. Council noted a desire to have commercial spaces supporting the retail core where certain office uses are not allowed in the designated street front of BD1 zoned properties (ECDC 16.43.020.A Table 16.43-1). The legislative history for the designated street front noted that some of the consideration for the designated street front were where pedestrian activity was most prevalent and whether there were commercial uses on both sides of the street. Interim Ordinance 4262 extended the designated street front around the retail core where there are commercial uses on both side of the street in the BD2 zones. Table 16.43-1. In order to remove the ambiguity in the BD permitted use table, Interim Ordinance 4262 included amendments to clarify office uses outside of the BD1 zone and revising the language regarding multifamily only building locational requirements consistent with the legislative history. The office use blank spaces that were created when Ord. 3955 was adopted were replaced with "A" meaning these specified office uses are allowed. Additionally, the locational requirement for multifamily units was Packet Pg. 214 8.1 replaced with a reference to ECDC 16.43.040.13 which provides the detail on ground floor uses. (Exhibit B in Interim Ordinance 4262) Attachments: Exhibit 1: Interim Ordinance No. 4262 Exhibit 2: DRAFT Resolution of Findings Supporting BD2 Designated Street Front Revisions Exhibit 3: April 19, 2022 City Council Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 4: April 21, 2022 City Council Public Minutes Exhibit 5: May 24, 2022 City Council Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 215 8.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.4262 N AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, N ESTABLISHING INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD ZONES, SETTING 6 SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE ORDINANCE, Z AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED a THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH a ORDINANCES 4253, 4254, AND 4255. WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots that do not front on a designated street front; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4247 took effect on immediately on February 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium adopted by Ordinance 4247 was scheduled to terminate on April 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended six days by virtue of Ordinance 4253; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended two more times by virtue of Ordinances 4254 and 4255; and WHEREAS, the moratorium extensions were intended to allow planning staff and the city attorney sufficient time to research the history and legislative intent surrounding the BD zones and to carefully evaluate the intent behind the designated street front regulations and the ramifications of possible changes to those regulations, particularly in the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, that research led to a heightened understanding of the intent behind the BD designated street front map and the BD permitted use table; and WHEREAS, the history suggests that what was seen in 2011 as the logical limits of the downtown commercial core may no longer fit the circumstances of 2022 due to the fact that certain blocks are showing vibrant commercial activity right up to the edges of the designed street front map; and WHEREAS, the city council would like to encourage the continued vibrancy of the downtown commercial core by expanding the limits of the designated street front map to require at least some commercial use of new structures within the expansion area; and s x w WHEREAS, the city council would also like to remove an ambiguity in the permitted use table; NOW, THEREFORE, z THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS 2 FOLLOWS: a Packet Pg. 216 8.1.a Section 1. Designated Street Front Map Revision. Map 16.43-1, contained within N ECDC 16.43.030, and entitled "Designated Street Front for BD Zones," is hereby amended to Cm extend the designated street front as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth (extended street fronts are shown in crosshatch). Section 2. BD Permitted Use Table Revision. Table 16.43-1, contained in ECDC 16.43.020, entitled "Uses," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in kedffetigh)• Section 3. Repeal of Moratorium. Ordinance 4247, which had established a moratorium on certain development in the BD2 zone, and Ordinances 4253, 4254, and 4255 which collectively extended that moratorium through June 2, 2022, are collectively hereby repealed. Section 4. Duration of Interim Regulations Adopted in Sections 1 and 2. The interim regulations adopted by sections 1 and 2 of this ordinance shall commence on the effective date of this ordinance. As long as the city holds a public hearing on this ordinance and adopts findings and conclusions in support of its continued effectiveness (as contemplated by Section 5 herein), this ordinance shall not terminate until six (6) months after the effective date, unless it is repealed sooner. Section 5. Public Hearing on Interim Standards. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and s x w RCW 35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing on this interim ordinance within d E sixty (60) days of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on July 19, 2022 unless the city council, by subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No later a Packet Pg. 217 8.1.a than the next regular council meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council shall adopt findings of fact on the subject of this interim ordinance and either justify its continued effectiveness or repeal the interim ordinance. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: C CLE , SCO P SSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADA FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: May 20, 2022 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: May 24, 2022 PUBLISHED: May 27, 2022 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2022 N m N le r Q Packet Pg. 218 8.1.a ORDINANCE NO. 4262 N tD N le 6 Z d u c C EL O E �L r 0 L U- L Co N N a Co C �L 2 V a N w N le 6 Z d v C R C EL O E �L r a+ t K W r C d E t v r r Q Packet Pg. 219 8.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4262 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 241h day of May, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4262. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD ZONES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE ORDINANCE, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCES 4253, 4254, AND 4255. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 24th day of May, 2022. CLERK,S PASSEY N m N le r Q Packet Pg. 220 IIIIIII I 8.1.a Designated Street Front ""NpDALEY SIN J 1 d w a -3= �BD3 L WAY LE ST ALDE DALEY ST lz[= >� Z — a C E_ �L - C C - Z LL > BELL m m L � n N W G tm co� V N� N 0 Zu CM E= R c WALNUT a ST O E d s K w C I Packet Pg. 221 1 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 1/3 8.1.a 16.43.020 Uses. A. Table 16.43-1. Permitted Uses BD1 GBDI BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Commercial Uses Retail stores or sales A A A A A A Offices A X A A A A Legal/law firms A X A A A A Financial A X \ A A A Advising A X A A A A Mortgage A X A A A A Banks (without tellers) A X A A A A Accounting A X A A A A Counseling A X A A A A Architecture A X A A A A Engineering A X A A A A Advertising A X \ \ A \ Insurance A X \ \ A A Fitness related business (yoga/pilates/gym/fitness club) A X \ A A A Service uses A A«1 A A A A Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X X X X X Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant, microbreweries/distilleries or food service establishment that also provides an on -site retail outlet open to the public A A A A A A Automobile sales and service X X A A X X Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents C X A A A X Printing, publishing and binding establishments C X A A A C Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in Chapter 4.90 ECC' A A A A A A Residential Single-family dwelling A X A A A A Multiple dwelling unit(s) — must he-, Inented onsecend floor or behind first ^ [ feet fromside-walk or rights e f waysee ECDC 16.43.030.13 for further location standards A X A A A A Other Uses Bus stop shelters A A A A A A Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A A A A A A N CD N r� a The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 222 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 2/3 8.1.a Permitted Uses BD1 BDI GFSF0) BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R) A X A A A A Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C C C A C Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 A A A A A A Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B X B B B B Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone B X B B B X Commercial parking lots C X C C C X Wholesale uses X X X C X X Hotels and motels A A A A A A Amusement establishments C C C C C C Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions C X C C C C Drive-in/through businesses (businesses with drive through facilities) X X C A C X Laboratories X X C C C X Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use X X X C X X Day-care centers C X C C A C Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums X X C C A X Medical uses, e.g., A X A A A A Physicians A X A A A A Dental A X a A A A Optometrist (without retail) A X A A A A Physical therapy (without retail) A X A A A A Counseling A X \ 1 1 1 Other similar medical services A X \ 1 1 \ Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A A A A A A Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 C X C C C A Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers X X C C A X Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 C C C C C C Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D X D D D D Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC X X D D D D A = Permitted primary use B = Permitted secondary use N to N r.+ X W r C d E t c� c� a The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 223 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 3/3 C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit N X = Not permitted C4 NOTES: (1) BD Zone GFSF = Ground Floor Designated Street Frontage (first 45 feet measured from public rights-of-way/sidewalk or parks/plazas) as defined under Edmonds Community Development Code Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones. Buildings set back 15 feet or more from the sidewalk shall not be subject to the BD Zone GFSF requirements. (2) Services — by appointment uses not providing open door retail/dining/entertainment functions as a primary component of the business are not allowed within BD 1 GFSF (first 45 feet). Open door businesses, e.g., real estate offices, banks (with tellers and no drive-throughs), nail and hair salons are allowed. For conditional uses listed in Table 16.43-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria are met: 1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk. Vehicular access shall only be provided consistent with ECDC 18.80.060. When a curb cut is necessary, it shall be landscaped to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape and shall be located and designed to be as unobtrusive as possible. 2. Design and Landscaping. The project shall be designed so that it is oriented to the street and contributes to the pedestrian streetscape environment. Fences more than four feet in height along street lot lines shall only be permitted if they are at least 50 percent open, such as a lattice pattern. Blank walls shall be discouraged, and when unavoidable due to the nature of the use shall be decorated by a combination of at least two of the following: a. Architectural features or details; b. Artwork; c. Landscaping. B. Exception to the BD GSFS. The owner of a building in the BD zone may apply for an exception from the restrictions on offices and medical uses within the designated street front for leasable space meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The space is less than 500 square feet; 2. The space does not contain direct access to the street or sidewalk; 3. The previous use was a nonconforming use (e.g., not retail); and 4. The space has been vacant for a period of more than six months. [Ord. 3955 § 1 (Att. A), 2014; Ord. 3932 § 6, 2013; Ord. 3918 § 1 (Att. 1), 2013; Ord. 3894 § 4, 2012; Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008]. a The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 224 8.1.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH955511 ORD NO 4262 4263 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 05/27/2022 and ending on 05/27/2022 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers Linda Phillips during all of said period. Morary Public EMY te of VVashinroton l"'r"C"i �,;liiM$ El2;l2025 The amount the fee fors h publicarion is ip:lon tiunibe, 4417 $34.40. Subscribed and sworn 7� day of before, a on this f. I , / 2 - , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds - LEGALADS 114101416 NICHOLASAALK N tD N le Q Packet Pg. 225 8.1.a Classified Proof ORDINANCE SUMMARY of" City of Edmonds, Washiroon On me 241h day of Mayy, 2 ,'Q the Clly Cduft" of the Cily o} EdRtnncu, p'dB9ad If}a follkI drdlna 11. 1fr6 atmmades Of Bail Ordinances tonslsiing QI int are Provided "foftwe: OR iNAN NO.42B AN CROINANCE CIF I DS, WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD ZONES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE ORDINANCE, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCES 425a. 4264. AND 4255, AN ORDINANCE OF�NRNE 4 OS, WASH INGTON, AMENDING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 1830 FCDC, ENTITLED '$TO RMWATE R MANAGEMENT,' IN ITS ENT1RE7Y. The full Vaxl of these ordnance will be sent upon requrat DATED this 241h Day of May.2022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Published: May 27, 2022- EDH956511 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 05/27/2022 01:23:13 pm Page: 2 N tD N le r Q Packet Pg. 226 8.1.b RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO SUPPORT THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 4262, WHICH ADOPTED INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD ZONES. WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots that do not front on a designated street front; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4247 took effect on immediately on February 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium adopted by Ordinance 4247 was scheduled to terminate on April 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended six days by virtue of Ordinance 4253; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended two more times by virtue of Ordinances 4254 and 4255; and WHEREAS, the moratorium extensions were intended to allow planning staff and the city attorney sufficient time to research the history and legislative intent surrounding the BD zones and to carefully evaluate the intent behind the designated street front regulations and the ramifications of possible changes to those regulations, particularly in the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, that research led to a heighted understanding of the intent behind the BD designated street front map and the BD permitted use table; and WHEREAS, the history suggests that what was seen in 2011 as the logical limits of the downtown commercial core may no longer fit the circumstances of 2022 due to the fact that certain blocks are showing vibrant commercial activity right up to the edges of the designed street front map; and WHEREAS, the city council adopted an updated designated street front map with Ordinance 4262 as an interim zoning measure; and WHEREAS, with Ordinance 4262, the city council sought to encourage the continued vibrancy of the downtown commercial core by expanding the limits of the designated street front map to require at least some commercial use of new structures within the expansion area; and o WHEREAS, with Ordinance 4262, the city council also sought to remove an ambiguity in the permitted use table; and z x w WHEREAS, the city council would like to leave the updated designated street front map and c permitted use table in place for the remainder of the interim zoning period while awaiting a E a Packet Pg. 227 8.1.b recommendation from the planning board on a permanent map and permitted use table; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS. The city council hereby adopts the above Whereas clauses as its findings of fact to support the adoption of Ordinance 4262. RESOLVED this day of )2022. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, MIKE NELSON ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. .r Q Packet Pg. 228 8.1.c with the auditor the City's hired to review those numbers. It is not as simple as looking at the incoming number of cases, it is also the things being juggled and the ones in the system appearing for probation. If that trend continues, SCPDA will reduce staffing in Edmonds and reduce public defender costs. Councilmember L. Johnson said two things stood out to her including Ms. Kyle's comment about the most vulnerable may have the worst outcome and not using the criminal justice system for systemic issues. When talking about poverty and specifically those who are unhoused and everything that comes with that, she asked what is the best way to address that. Some people are very uncomfortable with seeing people who are unhoused and want it addressed in a certain way. Ms. Kyle said housing is the key; if the intent is housing the unhoused, they need a home to go to, but that requires being creative as it is not a one size fits all. For example, someone who is unhoused because they are autistic and no longer have family support, need a different housing option than a shelter with ambient noise that may dysregulate an autistic person but would be good for a person who just needs recovery as being in a community can be a positive for people in recovery. It is important to see people as individuals and recognize their strengths. Generalizations are used as a way to wrap our head around things, but these are human beings who are complex and have the possibility of success. Ms. Kyle continued, one of the hardest parts of working with unhoused populations is many of them have lost hope. As one thinks of a chronically unhoused person or someone who doesn't want help, it is because they have been harmed previously and are taking survival protective action and maybe the behaviors that people don't like to see is just that trauma showing up and they need to be asked about their path. There are 41 navigation teams in Snohomish County; there needs to be housing to navigate them to. Creating opportunities through education is important; Edmonds College has some great low barrier programs to help with basics such as how to sign up for medical insurance, how to get into college, etc. Every year of education is likely a protective action and the less likely a person will be her client and more likely they will be out in the community earning a living and supporting themselves. The City is trying to be creative such as establishing the community court and a court calendar for people to get relicensed and consider their ability to pay. The highest crime they see referred is Theft III; getting creative around diversion programs for simple thefts is important. The stereotypical way of thinking is that if people are punished, they will stop the behavior. However, as public defenders they see that punishment does not change behavior, relationships change behavior and their needs to be investment in those relationships. Mayor Nelson thanked Ms. Kyle for sharing their social worker with the City's homelessness taskforce earlier this year. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO ADD AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION AS ITEM 8.1 AND TO RENUMBER THE REMAINING COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEMS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described the procedures for in -person audience comments. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 229 8.1.c Christi Flynn, Edmonds, representing her husband and her neighbors the McLaughlin, spoke about Perrinville Creek, fish, City structures and their properties. Their properties, west of Talbot Road at the end of Perrinville Creek before it goes beneath the railroad tracks, have been significantly impacted by the creek in the last two years. Exhibit A in her handout is an overview map from a report the City did in 2010 studying similar issues. Increased heavy rain events and resulting stormwater runoff create damaging high water flows in the creek when coupled with the undersized and/or improperly maintained City structures, culverts and crossings. Tons of sediment, large rocks and wood debris are flushed downstream choking out potential salmon habitat and damaging properties. For the last 18 months, they have been working with the Edmonds public works department to find a long term solution to the flooding, fish habitat and property destruction. They seek a collaborative and cooperative process with all the stakeholders involved. Ms. Flynn continued, they strongly believe any plan for the creek must include the following, 1) they basically agreed to a concept shown or known as option/alignment C in the handout in 2021. However, details such as making it more natural looking, more sinuous, possibly backup bypass issues and maintenance issues may need to be worked out. 2) a mitigation plan or diversion plan for the huge volume of water and sediment that flows through the creek during heavy rainfall events. Former Public Works Director Phil Williams informed them that 73% of the water in the creek originates in Lynnwood. During heavy rain events, rushing waters erode the banks in South County Park sending tons of sand and rock through the creek which end up damming and blocking the City's structures in the creek and ruining any hope of salmon habitat. 3) a substantially improved culvert or crossing under the railroad tracks. 4) replace and lower the culvert under Talbot Road. The current configuration is a barrier to high flows downstream and any fish migration upstream. As property owners, they want to work with the City and all stakeholders in a common-sense approach. It is does not make sense to carve out a new, temporary creek bed through their properties. She submitted written materials Chris Walton, Edmonds, referenced the project at Main Street & 6t'', and said consideration needs to be given to where the town wants to be in 10-20 years and have a vision for that. He was concerned because developers and real estate development organizations throughout the region are changing the town fast and not necessarily in a great way. They have a lot of money and can influence people who make decisions; the only thing that can be done to slow the negative effects of developers is to have very good codes, a vision, and a good architectural review board that keeps them from using the maximization of profits as the only goal. He was not anti -business, but the reality is maximizing profits results in pushing the limits of codes as far as possible. He felt Main Street was a good example of where the City is not headed in the next 10-20 years, where there will be an immensely dense downtown with a lot of people in condos, very limited businesses with only high end restaurants and wine bars, and pushing out the type of businesses that are needed in Edmonds. He urged the council to create a solid vision and communicate that vision to the engineering groups creating the codes to preserve the quality of Edmonds going forward. Lynda Fireman, Edmonds, commented Edmonds is a small town with historic roots. It is a suburb and c not Seattle which is why people are drawn to live and visit. The business core is very small and now BD2 c' is not required to have a commercial first floor. She cited a comment from the developer that the high T density of the proposed project is seen as a guide for further development allowed and encouraged by the Q comprehensive plan. She asked if there was a secret plan to change the zoning and increase density for Q RM 1.5 on this square blook and for the rest of Edmonds. After reading through all the ordinances and ch council meetings, there is never enough time set aside to have a clear and transparent City plan to align the wishes of the residents with the need to increase the density for revenue. Everything is pushed through without attention to detail or consideration of the ramifications on surrounding properties. She questioned w why these three lots downtown were mixed commercial if the intent was always to allow multifamily building. Ordinance 3955 clearly states permitted residential uses for downtown mixed commercial are E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 230 8.1.c single family dwelling and multiple dwelling units but they have to be located on the second floor behind the first 45 feet from the sidewalks. Staff has said that was not the intent of the ordinance, it was different than what was written further on, apparently an interpretation. As she understood it from a legal perspective, intent is not the law. Clarifying it now after the fact when this is a current development issue cannot be legal, there is too much doublespeak. Citizens deserve clarity and to know the true intent of the mayor's intention and his direction to staff. Ms. Fireman asked that the emergency ordinance be extended so that design standards can be properly addressed. She was not asking for the ordinance to be extended for a maximum of six months and not to have the developer and his architect involved as it is a conflict of interest. If it takes a year or more, so be it; the city council has the power to have it done right once and for all. Interim and future design features should require the scale be addressed; scale is the relationship of a building in terms of size, height, bulk, density and aesthetics to its surroundings. A building scale is contextual in nature and is a key factor in determining how well it blends in with the neighborhood. The comprehensive plan says stereotype, boxy, multiple unit residential buildings are to be avoided and it's essential that commercial developments continue to harmonize and enhance the residential small town character that the citizens of Edmonds so strongly desire to retain. She questioned what else was waiting in the pipeline that would use these interim design standards before the design standards and comprehensive plan is looked at again and how long will that take and whether it would be after all the 25 identified parcels had been developed. She gestured toward a wall in council chambers, stating it likely was not even 25 feet high; looking across from her condo, the wall will be 40 feet high and she will not be any further away from it than the chairs. Greg Brewer, Edmonds, said an important decision is about to be made concerning permittable uses in BD2 mixed commercial zone. If 100% residential is allowed to be built there, the ability to protect and grow diversity and equity in that important zone is at stake. Losing ground floor commercial will have devastating effects on the ability of businesses to grown and thrive in a zone set aside for them by the predecessors. Ground floor commercial must be protected. The City is changing rapidly as more restaurants and services fill the downtown core extending up Main Street to the BD2 zone. With the new construction of the Commons on the corner and Civic Park nearby, the intersection at 6t' & Main will soon have an even greater prominence for the downtown. It is indeed the eastern gateway to the downtown business district. As he read through the memorandum that City planners and city attorney put together to justify 100% residential, he saw more evidence toward keeping ground floor commercial in the BD2 zone. Both sides of Main Street east of 6t' currently have businesses with 9 on the north side and at least 2 on the south side, an extension of the business corridor. Eliminating commercial on the north side will permanently destroy this corridor. Mr. Brewer referred to page 11, paragraph 1 of the memorandum which states, in the core area the intent c was to avoid extending the designated street front along areas where there are significant residential uses. 0 There are few residential uses near this intersection. Conversely, designated street fronts should be reserved for areas where there are businesses on both sides of the street. It makes perfect sense to extend v N the line east on Main and include this part of the BD2 zone. There are a couple areas of town where this N extension could help clarify the code and eliminate the need to rewrite spot zoning for BD2 areas left c' behind. Regarding the blue line identifying the designated street front, on page 12 it states council has the r legislative discretion to alter the designated street front map if it sees fit to do so. Recognizing it as a no Q brainer; he asked the council to extend the line and save the eastern gateway to the downtown core for Q business on the ground floor. Businesses are already across the street and it is by far the easiest way to ch clean up the confusion. Jenna Jotika Nand, Edmonds, spoke regarding a troubling trend of underage prostitution along the z w Highway 99 corridor, specifically being facilitated by bikini barista shops. She interviewed multiple young women who claim they are of age but look to be between 12 and 14 years old. These young °' E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 231 8.1.c women are heavily tattooed and are often functionally illiterate. This is a scrouge in the community where she grew up and was a girl scout, not a place where girls are supposed to be selling sex in barista shops claiming they are 18 years old when they have clearly not even gone through puberty. This is a very sensitive topic that has to be approached in a way that the young girls do feel they are being criminalized but to target the pimps. She would like the City to make an effort to review business licenses and L&I compliance with all of these underage prostitution joints that are springing up on Highway 99, specifically in the Edmonds section of Highway 99, but it is a problem from Everett to Seattle. She was shocked to see one of these prostitution joints spring up in Edmonds. Robert Stivers, Edmonds, said he loves living in Edmonds has been here for nearly a half century. Downtown is like one of Rick Steves' precious backdoors to Europe but in the USA and its history goes back to the 19t' century. A visitor once compared it to Main Street in Disneyland, only more real. It is his go -to place for shopping and services; he loves stopping at Teri's Toybox to see the latest models of exotic animals, seeing what David Varnau and Andy Eccleshall have created, the wonders of geology in the Wishing Stone, buying a gift card for his wife at Sound Styles, and getting train tickets at the Amtrak station, all essentially public spaces, one of the reasons why cities exist. Edmonds has a pedestrian scale vibrant downtown and public spaces like parks and playing fields. The City needs more public spaces as the population increases especially downtown; it does not make sense to increase one without increasing the other. The proposed development flies in the face of this; it is the beginning of the alteration of downtown Edmonds culture. He urged the council not to erode space dedicated to public uses or erode downtown Edmonds with increased population without also providing this type of space. He also did not want to walk under private balconies having lived in New York City too long for that, or go by streetside private reserves even down an alley. He supported utilizing for private use the most underutilized of all developable spaces in the modern city, the rooftops. Acknowledging it would cost more for a developer, the future of downtown Edmonds is at stake and the result will be a healthier and cleaner downtown with public spaces to accommodate all who want to visit and the preservation of the unique Edmonds downtown culture. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, spoke regarding the BD2 moratorium and BD2 design standards. The minutes of the April 2, 2013 city council meeting are clear, only BD4 was presented to the council with having two options, either commercial on the ground floor or multifamily only. She quoted from page 7 where Rob Chave stated clearly for the councilmembers to understand, "in the BD4 there are two options, a commercial building that requires the 15 foot step -back or a multifamily building up to 30 feet with a front yard setback." She pointed out he never mentions nor is there any reference during the entire city council meeting before the ordinance is passed that BD2 also has these two options, only BD4 has the second use of multifamily clearly defined and referenced in writing in the code and there are different standards if either commercial or multifamily only. BD2 is not included in that exception. If the intent was that BD2 could also have both interpretations, why did Mr. Chave not say that? Because it never could. Only BD4 is clarified in the code that there are different parameters, setbacks, design standards and density with the multifamily only option versus commercial. She questioned why BD2 was not done at the same time. There is nothing in writing to clearly define that there are two options in the BD2 just like BD4. The staff -created multifamily only areas in the BD2 zone will now have the most intense density of any multifamily building in any downtown zoning. The reason is they are attempting to use the commercial zoning to go right up to the sidewalk with entirely residential. Dr. Dotsch urged the council to think about these newly zoned 28 multifamily lots within the BD2 subarea now having the highest density anywhere downtown. To say this is somehow a transition area is incorrect as it goes from the less intense density of BD1 to this new BD2 designation that is much denser to then the adjacent surrounding RM-1.5 zoning which is less dense. She imagined this ring of 28 lots w being out of sorts with downtown density, use and bulk from Sunset Avenue, down 2" d South, down 3' Avenue North, on 6t' Avenue and up Main Street and Dayton Street with the solution for the setback idea E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 232 8.1.c to actually shrink the current 15 foot setback to only 5 feet from the RM-1.5 middle housing zone adjacent to these lots. The neighbors might want to know that their homes next to this newly defined zoning is putting these giant housing projects only 5 feet from their property line with decks and roof top decks hanging over their homes. This is not a small change, but newly created zone with new zoning requirements. Consideration also needs to be given to the increased density and massing on these 28 downtown lots and whether it even complies with the GMA or is compatible with current infrastructure including public facilities and services needed to serve these developments. She urged the council to make a fully informed decision tonight; if councilmembers were unable to say they were fully informed, she urged them not to allow this public process to be stopped by removing a full and fair discission of what this will truly look like. Just like the connector discussion sped up before the public really knew the impact and many councilmembers helped stop that from happening. Once these decisions are allowed to go ahead without clarity, it is hard to pull back, but it can be done. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, said on April 5t' after the public hearing was closed, the city council took unplanned and unannounced action which upset citizens and resulted in citizens speaking out from the audience. New information including staff opinions about historical legislative intent were discussed after the citizens' time to comment ended. During the public hearing, he asked city council how citizens were supposed to know how to prepare public comments for the public hearing as neither the public notice nor the agenda packet identified the findings the council was to consider adopting. Council did not answer his question but added an additional unannounced element to the public hearing process that citizens were also unaware of before the public hearing. He asked the council to address this conduct and take steps to ensure it never happens again during the middle of a public hearing. Next, Mr. Reidy said state law states a moratorium may be renewed for one or more six month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal. He referred to the use of the word "renewal," which is different than extension. Renewal allows for a new moratorium as opposed to the mere extension of extra time to the pervious moratorium. A moratorium adopted without a work plan may be effective for not longer than six months. A moratorium can be for one month, two months, four months, any length of time not longer than six months. This fact was known to the Edmonds city council prior to council's vote to pass Ordinance 4247 on February 15t''. Mr. Reidy continued, as this fact was known upfront, it was critical that city council established a proper time period for the original moratorium. Edmonds city council chose two months; this was allowed by the not longer than six months authority provided by the statute. Once Edmonds city council made its legal choice of two months, that time period could not be extended. Who would imagine Edmonds city council thinking a moratorium could be extended rather than replacing the original moratorium with a new moratorium. Making it worse, council failed to adopt findings of fact justifying the original moratorium before it expired. Council also failed to justify continuing the original moratorium after the April 5t' public hearing up to April 15t''. He urged the council to read the emergency declaration in Ordinance 4218 and questioned whether there was really an emergency if the council had the legal right to merely extend the four months effective period of Ordinances 4200 and 4201 and do so without holding a subsequent public hearing and making findings of fact. He questioned whether the council is being advised that they can have their cake and eat it too. He urged the council to stop abusing the moratorium and interim zoning process, citing Ordinance 4210 as another great example. Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments. Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, referred to the tree ordinance, stating trees are legally the property of of those whose land they grown on and can only be given voluntarily to the City by owners for protection. Edmonds has placed the public burden of tree canopy coverage on a small group of property owners by w seizing and then charging them for the rights to their trees and the land they shadow. She provided an analogy; the City decides your neighbors would benefit from more vehicles. Although neighbors have °' E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 233 8.1.c 13. APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH SCJ FOR HWY 99 GATEWAY -REVITALIZATION STAGE 2 PROJECT 14. PARK PLANNER AND CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGER JOB DESCRIPTION APPROVAL 15. LEAD BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATOR JOB DESCRIPTION 16. RESOLUTION EXTENDING TEMPORARY EMERGENCY SICK LEAVE POLICY 17. PROCEDURE FOR ACCEPTING WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS 18. WWTP PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION: POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(D At 8:38 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 20 minutes and would be held in the Police Training Room, located in the Public Safety Complex as well as virtually. Elected officials present at the executive session were Mayor Nelson, and Councilmembers K. Johnson, Tibbott, Buckshnis, Paine, Olson, L. Johnson, and Chen. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday. At 8:59 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended for 15 minutes to 9:14 p.m. At 9:14 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended for 10 minutes to 9:24 p.m. At 9:24 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced the executive session would be extended for 10 minutes to 9:34 p.m. The executive session concluded at 9:34 p.m. Mayor Nelson reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 9:34 p.m. Mayor Nelson announced in conferring with Council President Olson, it was agreed to move the ARPA Funding Status and Special Event Permits and Amendments to ECC Title 4 Licenses to a future meeting. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO DELETE ITEMS 3 AND 4. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE BD2 MORATORIUM (Previously Azenda Item 8.1) City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained any time a city council adopts a moratorium, the statute requires v findings be adopted to justify the moratorium. It is not a question of whether to adopt findings, but N whether the findings reflect the council's belief in terms of why the moratorium was adopted and whether N they clearly and fully articulate the bases for the moratorium. Item 8.1 in the packet contains a draft cm resolution with several whereas clauses that represent his best effort to capture what he believes to be r many of the council's concerns, but he may not have captured all of them. Therefore, the council is free to Q amend, add, or remove whereas clauses, but ultimately the resolution in some form should be adopted Q tonight with possible amendments by the city council. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADD A WHEREAS CLAUSE THAT STATES SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF, w WHEREAS SOME COUNCILMEMBERS FELT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO RECONSIDER WHETHER THE DESIGNATED STREET FRONT MAP SHOULD BE EXTENDED. E t Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 234 8.1.c Councilmember Tibbott recalled during council deliberations and looking at the map, councilmembers realized the development of downtown has filled out and his question was what would it take to extend the blue line to other areas of the City thereby extending the street front. Council President Olson expressed her full support for this change, commenting a lot has changed in the downtown over the years. One specific recent change is the Commons and that is one direction in which the line should be extended because it has become almost a hub of the commercial district. Councilmember Paine asked whether the timing mattered as part of the findings, whether it was during the first part of the moratorium or mid -moratorium. Mr. Taraday answered the council has six months of moratorium authority. Justifications on day 1 of the moratorium for initially enacting it may be different than on day 60 or day 90 if the council decides to continue the moratorium. The justifications do not have to be the ones that were anticipated on day 1; anything from day 1 to present would be acceptable to include in the resolution. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the motion. She noted some councilmembers were around during the BD discussions. The gist of the 2013 ordinances and the latest Ordinances 3955 and 3918 dealt with something that fulfilled the economic development plan and strategic goals, to create synergy for commercial businesses where possible, for example, implementing a retail core. Adding this will help; there is already a very dense downtown and multifamily housing is needed throughout the City. She referred to the Edmonds City Council approved minutes of November 4, 2013 where Stephen Clifton talked about public safety with the office space and the central gathering place coming into the Commons. The vision was for a retail core in the downtown area. Councilmember Chen expressed support for extending the blue line, however, he wanted to see a vibrant downtown with mixed use. The BD2 zone was intended to be mixed use so he would like to see that type of development where commercial and residential are mixed for that purpose. Councilmember L. Johnson said she did not support the motion. This is a new concern that never came up with the other two projects in a similar area of the BD2 zone. By extending it, commercial only would be allowed, but there would be no requirement for mixed use or multifamily. The City limits where multifamily is allowed and this is one more attempt to further limit it. These concerns were not expressed before and are an example of the way the community has repeatedly reacted to multifamily development. Councilmember Paine said she was troubled by this last minute addition. It is trying to create a solution that is very short sighted before there is additional information from an economic and residential needs assessment of the community. It is clearly no longer 2013 and she does not support this addition to the whereas clauses as the council is not operating with good information. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. L JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON Q- VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Q ci City Clerk Scott Passey advised that was Resolution 1490. z x Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. W c d E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 235 8.1.c 3. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE (previously Item 8.2) Senior Planner Mike Clugston provided an update on the status of the design standards for multifamily only buildings in BD2. Since the April 5' meeting where there were comments on several of the design standards, staff took the standards to the Architectural Design Board (ADB) who were generally in favor of the proposed language with a couple of tweaks. Staff s recommend is to approve the interim design standards in Exhibit 2 via the ordinance in Exhibit 3. With regard to materials, which was one of the design standards, no change was recommended; the ADB and the public seemed to like the concept of materials used on these types of buildings. Similarly, for the street side amenity space, the concept that provides a setback was well received and no changes are proposed. Mr. Clugston continued, there were no concerns with the private amenity space generally, but there was some concern with roof top decks. As a result a small change was proposed to the roof top deck areas as outlined in the packet. Previously a roof top deck would be allowed to fulfill the amenity space requirement; that was changed to say it could not be used to fulfill the amenity space requirement, but could be provided. Another question raised was whether roof top decks should be allowed to the edge of the roof; the building code allows railings at the edge. There was some concern from the council, public and the ADB who felt some setback of the railing would be useful for safety and proposed a 5-foot setback as a starting point. He recalled a setback for the railing was also suggested by a member of the public at the April 5' meeting. Mr. Clugston continued, another question was raised about whether the roof top deck should be counted toward the private amenity space requirement. There was some concern that a developer would put all the 50% amenity space on the roof, thereby depriving some individual residences of balconies, decks and patios. The revised language changes the ability to use the roof top deck to meet the amenity space requirement; a roof top deck is still allowed, but all the private amenity space has to be provided with individual units or at the ground level meeting the existing standards in the proposed language. He summarized with the feedback from council, the ADB and the public, the design standards are generally pretty good and would result in improved projects in multifamily only buildings in BD2. Council President Olson said she not sure she was against the idea of a roof top deck but was not sure she was ready to say they absolutely should be allowed. Her concern was with building heights, a cultural value in Edmonds. When building heights were increased 5 feet at one point, the idea wasn't to allow increased levels of living units, but to allow for some roof modulation or slope so the roofs were not all flat because that is not a great design in the Pacific Northwest. Things can be placed on a roof top deck, even if they aren't permanent, such as umbrellas and furniture. If part of the desire to keep building heights at a certain level is to be respectful of views due to the slope throughout the lower level of Edmonds, she had an issue with roof top decks in the context of the community value of avoiding increasing building heights due the impact on views. She summarized she was uncertain she was ready to allow roof top decks as an amenity. Mr. Clugston responded a number of exceptions to the height are allowed such as an architectural feature T that can cover 5% of the roof area on a BD building, elevator penthouses, solar panels, etc. He L summarized the height limit such as 30 feet is not an absolute drop dead maximum as things can project Q above it. Using that information, staff determined roof top decks fit with that concept particularly if the railings are transparent and there are no permanent structures on the roof top. z COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, x w TO EXTEND FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. c d E t Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 236 8.1.c Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin said staff is not wed to the concept of roof top decks as part of the interim design standards. The most recent revision excludes roof top decks from the required private amenity space and they are happy to exclude roof top deck from the interim design standards. The multifamily design standards are a 2022 work plan item which will provide more time to delve into it. The focus of the interim design standards is setback, articulation, and more green space on multifamily buildings. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was not sure if she was in favor of roof top decks; Edmonds is not Seattle and Seattle has a lot of them. She might be interested if they were recessed further than five feet. She recalled complaints the City received about the visibility of a tent on a business's roof for a long period of time due the slope. She supported having more research done because Edmonds is unique and she anticipated roof top patios could get out of hand. There are rooftop patios in many large cities and she was not sure Edmonds was large enough for that yet. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE REVISED INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS IN EXHIBIT 2 AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE IN EXHIBIT 3. Councilmember L. Johnson commented this is the third time the council has worked on this and the issues that were raised last week have been addressed. Staff came forward with what the council requested and further amendments can be made. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE BY REMOVING THE ROOF TOP PORTION AS IT IS WORTHY OF FURTHER DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Paine expressed support for the product as amended, noting there is an opportunity for greater review by the public and another public process. This is a good interim proposal and it was her understanding the process would take about nine months which would allow for a good public process. A MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON TO AMEND TO CHANGE THE CURRENT SECTION D OF 22.43.080 TO E AND ADD A NEW SECTION D THAT READS, SOME ROOF MODULATION IS REQUIRED WITH PREFERENCE FOR STEP DOWNS THAT FOLLOW THE SLOPE WHEN SLOPE EXISTS. Council President Olson said that was one of the features she notices and likes when she is downtown and prefers to see. The history of allowing an additional 5 feet in height was to allow slope on roofs or modulation so buildings were not square boxes and were a more attractive design. She recognized these were interim design standards, but some projects will vest under these interim design standards. Councilmember Paine asked how much slope modulation there was in other parts of Edmonds. She was concerned this would be disparate if it was only required in one of the business districts, noting it was not required for single family residences. She asked if any other zoning districts in the City required modulation on the slope. Council President Olson offered a point of clarification, that was not the amendment. Her motion was ch some roof modulation is required with preference for step-downs that follow the slope when slope exists, it would not be a mandate. z x w c a� E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 237 8.1.c Councilmember Paine said she was still curious about the answer to her question, whether this existed in any other zones. Mr. Clugston answered in the RM zones the base height maximum was 25 feet and an additional 5 feet was allowed with a roof pitch of 4:12 or greater. That was also permitted in BC zones. Councilmember Chen asked if there were any buildings in the City that had roof top amenities. Mr. Clugston answered roof top decks were allowed in other zones but the only one he was aware of was the new building at Westgate. Councilmember Chen said that could be a wonderful feature with enough setback. He supported respecting people's privacy by having enough distance from the edge of building so that people were looking at the water and mountain views and not into other people's windows. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AMEND WITH REGARD TO GROUND FLOOR STREET FRONTS, TO EXTEND THE STREET FRONT TO THE ABUTTING CORNERS AROUND THE INTERSECTION TO INCLUDE STREET FRONTS IN THOSE LOCATIONS. THE EFFECT WOULD BE TO EXTEND WHERE THERE IS COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL ON THE GROUND FLOOR IN THOSE LOCATIONS. THERE ARE THREE PLACES ON THE MAP WHERE IT IS EXTENDED TO ALL FOUR CORNERS AND FOUR PLACES WHERE IT IS NOT. FOR EXAMPLE MAIN AND 6TH, IT STOPS RIGHT AT 6TH AND THERE ARE TWO OTHER CORNERS THAT DO NOT HAVE STREET FRONT AND THREE OTHER PLACES THAT SIMILAR TO THAT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. Mr. Taraday asked if the intent was to have that brought back or have an ordinance drafted tonight that would accomplish that. Councilmember Tibbott said he was open to asking Mr. Taraday to bring and ordinance back to council for review. Mr. Taraday said he would need to work with planning staff on that; that type of an amendment would be difficult to adopt tonight. If the intent is to have that in place before lifting the moratorium, the moratorium would need to be extended. The complexity involved with a map amendment of that nature would be difficult to do at 10:15 p.m. without long extensions of the meeting. If the council extended the moratorium for a month, it would give him time work with the planning division to bring back an ordinance that would accomplish that. If that was the case, there would need to be other amendments made to the ordinance currently before the council such removing language in Section 2 that lifts the moratorium. Council President Olson asked if the council was otherwise satisfied with the design standards, could the section about the moratorium be struck while staff is figuring out the designated street front. Mr. Taraday answered the council has options, 1) adopt the design standards as just amended and lift the moratorium, �j or 2) adopt the design standards as just amended and keep the moratorium in place. Adopting the design standards and keeping the moratorium in place will require two separate ordinances. As he was not v certain how the discussion/vote would go, as a precaution, he prepared an ordinance to extend the c moratorium for a month so it was ready if the council needed it. If council wants to adopt the design N standards as amended and keep moratorium in place, a motion would need to be made to approve the T version of the ordinance that he sent the council by email this afternoon that contains immediate effect L language, not the packet version of the ordinance. Section 2 of that ordinance which repeals the Q moratorium would need to be deleted. He summarized if the council likes the design standards as amended and does not want to repeal the moratorium, that could be accomplished by deleting Section 2 of the ordinance he sent council this afternoon. z x w COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF +� THE SECOND. (D E t Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 238 8.1.c COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO ACCEPT THE DESIGN STANDARDS AS AMENDED TONIGHT AND OTHERWISE REPRESENTED IN THE ORDINANCE SENT THIS AFTERNOON BY EMAIL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DELETING SECTION 2 THAT LIFTS THE MORATORIUM. Councilmember L. Johnson observed there was an motion on the floor to approve the ordinance in the packet. Mr. Taraday agreed the ordinance was moved originally and assumed the version of the ordinance was the one he sent this afternoon. Councilmember L. Johnson said her motion was to approve the ordinance in the packet. Mr. Taraday clarified the packet version will not take effect prior to the expiration of the moratorium. A version of the ordinance needs to be adopted which takes effect immediately which is why he sent out a revised version this afternoon. The revised version does not change any of the substance of the design standards, it is contains a declaration of emergency and has an immediate effect clause. He asked whether the maker of the motion was okay substituting that version for the version in the packet. Councilmember L. Johnson said she was unable to give that at this point without reading what was emailed. Mayor Nelson observed there was already a motion on the floor and this is another motion. He suggested addressing the main motion. Council President Olson began to make an amendment, to have Section 2 deleted that lifts the moratorium. She asked if the emergency clause could be removed if the moratorium was not lifted. Mr. Taraday said if the council wanted to prevent developments vesting to the preexisting standards, the ordinance needs to take effect immediately. The packet version does not take effect immediately; the council would need to adopt the version he sent this afternoon in order for it to take effect immediately. He offered to highlight the change to the ordinance in the packet. Councilmember L. Johnson clarified the version Mr. Taraday sent this afternoon does not lift the moratorium, it allows the design standards to take immediate effect. Mr. Taraday answered it does both; the council probably will want the design standards to take immediate effect either way unless a separate ordinance is adopted that extends the moratorium. If a separate ordinance is adopted to extend the moratorium, then the design standards ordinance does not need to be an emergency. The motion was clarified as follows: Councilmember L. Johnson was open to changing the motion to include what was emailed to the council now that she had had a chance to look at it, provided that that lifts the moratorium. The seconder, Councilmember Paine agreed as long as it lifted the moratorium. Councilmember Buckshnis said she would like to see all of this in writing and give citizens an opportunity to participate. She was concerned that at 10:25 p.m., the council was attempting to approve something that was sent this afternoon and then making amendments to it. She preferred to have the ordinance in the packet. She did not support the motion but wanted to have the moratorium extended so this could be fixed and everyone could see it in writing in the packet. She asked what needed to be done to make that happen. Mr. Taraday said the council would want to adopt the other ordinance he emailed this evening, not the afternoon one, that extends the moratorium for a month. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the council would have to wait to do that until the motion the floor was addressed. Mr. Taraday agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis did not support the motion as she _ believed there needed to be a public process, the public had not read the ordinance and she had only read Z z it quickly. x w COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT WE TABLE THIS MOTION. E t Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 239 8.1.c UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM ONE MONTH. Council President Olson observed there was an ordinance that does that. She offered to read the ordinance. Councilmember L. Johnson raised a point of order, asking where this was on the agenda. Council President Olson answered this was one of the things the council can do. Councilmember L. Johnson said the council tabled this item. Mr. Taraday explained the motion to adopt the ordinance that adopts the interim design standards was tabled. If the council wants to take alternative action regarding the moratorium, it can do so, it can amend agenda, etc. A majority of the council can do whatever it wants during a regular meeting. Councilmember L. Johnson observed it was not on the existing agenda. Council President Olson asked if it was the council's desire to take vote to add this to the agenda or could it be done via a head nod. Councilmember L. Johnson commented the council did not take action via head nods. Council President Olson restated her motion: TO ADD THE ITEM TO THE AGENDA AND EXTEND THE MORATORIUM. Councilmember Paine said adding this to the agenda at 10:26 p.m. was a rather thin nail to hang the transparency hat on. Councilmember Chen said the council needs more time and cannot vote on something that was sent in the afternoon. He did not support the motion. Council President Olson offered to withdraw the motion and plan a special meeting on Thursday. Councilmember Chen said that would be more appropriate. Councilmember K. Johnson said she like to take this vote tonight and did not want to have a special meeting on Thursday for this one item. It is part and parcel of what the council has discussed tonight related to adopting a resolution to adopt the findings in support of the BD2 moratorium. The motion would be to extend moratorium and she favored taking that action tonight. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND 10 MINUTES TO 10:40. MOTION CARRIED (5-2) COUNCILMEMBERS L. JOHNSON AND PAINE VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, M FOR AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 z ZONE LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY x w ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED BY ORDINANCE 4253. c d E t Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 240 8.1.c Councilmember Buckshnis said this was following through on what Councilmember K. Johnson said. There is a moratorium in place, this is the formal action to extend it for one month. If the council does not take this action, the moratorium will expire on Thursday and she did not think the city attorney and staff would have the necessary materials completed in time for a continued meeting on Thursday. She preferred to either approve extending the moratorium and if not, it will end on April 21 and the interim building standards will take effect. This will give time to do what needs to be done in terms of getting packet materials done and extending the moratorium. Councilmember L. Johnson did not support the motion. She found it interesting that the council just tabled something based on being unable to review something that was received at 5:00 p.m., yet would vote on a document that was received during the council meeting which she has not had an opportunity to review. Councilmember Paine preferred to come back on Thursday. There is a chance to have enough public process to get through the tail end of the moratorium. Moratoriums are damaging to the City's reputation and progress on building, things that are normally allowed. She felt it was shortsighted and that the council would not get that much more information about what the business practices need to look like within a month as that is a much bigger study. Councilmember Chen agreed that the council needs to come back on Thursday. It is late at night and all of a sudden the council wants to pass a motion to extend the moratorium. He was not comfortable supporting that. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mr. Taraday explained a 4-3 vote adopts the ordinance, but does not take immediate effect with a 4-3 vote and will take effective 5 days after passage and publication. If the council does not meet on Thursday to take some other action, the moratorium will end at the close of business on Thursday and on Friday a developer theoretically could vest an application pursuant to the prior development standards. If the ordinance takes effect five business day after publication, next Wednesday, that leaves four business days, Friday, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, for a developer to vest an application. The council could take other action on Thursday that would take immediate effect, but five votes are required for an ordinance to take immediate effect. Council President Olson began to make a motion to add back Items 3 and 4 that were deleted so they could be discussed at the special meeting on Thursday, and then concluded a motion was not necessary. 4. ARPA FUNDING STATUS (Previously Item 8.3) Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 5. SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS AND AMENDMENTS TO ECC TITLE 4 LICENSES (Previously Item 8.4) Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. COUNCIL COMMITTEE MINUTES z x w c d E t Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 19, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 241 8.1.d EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE APPROVED MINUTES April 21, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director Kernen Lien, Interim Planning Manager Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 5:15 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present participating remotely, with the exception of Councilmember L. Johnson. 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Q COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. x w 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS c m Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments. z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 21, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 242 8.1.d Lynda Fireman, Edmonds, referred to the email she sent to council that asked they use their minds eye to visualize not only what each development will look like as part of a whole in the landscape, but also how it will impact the neighborhood, not just at the front and side but the back of the building as well. Earlier today as she was driving down Main Street, the spectacular view always takes her breath away. The current businesses on either side at 600, 605 and 611 Main do not interfere with the ambiance, allow enjoyment of the wonderful view and don't distract from it which is why residents live here and tourist come to experience it. She suggested imagining how it would look with the proposed apartments dwarfing the heritage cottage at 601 Main and obliterating the 1895 cottage at 605 Main, two of the last vestiges of Edmonds' heritage and a blight on the landscape forever, particularly if the same was built at 600 Main. The square block between 6' and 7' and Main & Bell is already very high density. Residents pay a premium to live there and spend their money in Edmonds. Some, definitely not all developers, are only in it to maximize their profits and their money goes into the bank; they don't care about the impact on the residents or on the City. Ms. Fireman applauded the council for their wish to add addendums to expand the limits of the designated street front map because businesses are needed, to extend the moratorium for two months for further study, and to eliminate roof top decks, add a provision to follow the slope of the lot against the alley and lot line to help reduce the scale of the building and alleviate the pervasiveness of the 40-foot tall straight flat wall against the alley lot line and allow the adjacent residents to reclaim a little of the lost visual of their surroundings and the light that will be taken away. She urged the council not to allow roof top decks, commenting the development was already oversized and residents want to avoid being kept awake at night. In addition, there is a wind tunnel that comes up the alley and she could envision things flying off the deck. She would like to see the development reduced in height and scale to fit in with the historic downtown and to somehow save the 1895 cottage; it has been a viable business for years and possibly can be moved. She asked the council to give consideration to those who live in the area and are impacted by the development as well as those who will be affected by other imminent development in BD2 spot zones. She recognized there was a lot of divisiveness around these issues, but hoped the council could come together to resolve them. Finis Tupper, Edmonds, commented this has been quite a charade. He recognized councilmembers had a lot of work to do and had to review a lot of materials in the agenda packet. He wondered if any councilmembers looked at Ordinance 3955 regarding BD1 ground floor street front and compared it to the code. He questioned why the code was not updated when Ordinance 3955 was passed. He questioned who was in charge at the City, who was checking this stuff, whether it was the attorney, the council president, the city clerk or the mayor. Anyone with a 6' grade education looking at the building standards for the BD1 zone knows it is business and mixed use commercial. Nowhere has Kernen Lien shown the council where City staff was told that outside the designated street front there could be an entirely multifamily project. The dimensional requirements in the zoning code clearly state 45 feet in the designated street front is required to be commercial. The exception in 7 under BD 1 ground floor street front does not apply to these buildings. There could be doctors or dentists in that 45 feet but there can't be in the BD or the designated street front. Every house in Edmonds has a designated street front. He questioned whether it was defined in the code and said the lie is related to ceiling height and allowed uses in those zones. What the council is trying to do is absolutely illegal and is appealable to the Growth Management Hearings Board. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, said the foundation to tonight's discussion hinges on whether to keep a small a portion of the required development in the BD2 downtown mixed commercial zone as commercial. It needs 4 to be accurately stated that multifamily is an allowed use in this zone, even encouraged as mixed use in the comprehensive plan along with a minimum square footage on the ground floor for businesses and jobs that x support and compliment the BD 1 commercial only zone. The 2020 validation study of the buildable lands w study comparing development predictions with actual development, shows Edmonds exceeded the total predicted housing units by 74%. It also shows the average buildable density in Edmond exceeded predicted E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 21, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 243 8.1.d targets by 64%. That is only through 2019, there is time to get this right. She asked how do the community wanted the future vision of Edmonds to play out, whether it was a greater emphasis on Edmonds just expanding housing only which the study clearly shows exceeded county targets, losing small businesses and commercial balance along with local job opportunity growth to coordinate with housing expansion. This will only push residents to travel farther for goods and services including driving further to their jobs because local business options have been removed for even more housing only buildings. A 15-minute City discussion was presented by the development services director as a possible goal for Edmonds, but if the vital supporting role that BD2 service businesses provide to the town is removed, it will become a 45-90 minute town in the end. Dr. Dotsch continued, support service businesses are vital to a thriving community and are excluded from the BD 1 ground floor designated street front zone. Chapter 16.43 which defines all the BD zones contains a footnote that states services, by appointment uses not providing open door retail, dining, entertainment functions as a primary component of the business, are not allowed within BD 1 ground floor street front first 45 feet. Open door businesses, e.g. real estate offices, banks with tellers and no drive throughs, nail and hair salons are allowed. Now the council is prioritizing eliminating the 13132 language that allows for these other uses, these smaller service business to thrive and compliment the mix of jobs and uses in the entire downtown district. Less options for small, appointment -only business will force residents to travel further for these vital services and the staff and clients they bring that frequent the retail shops, restaurants, banks in the core daily. This 13132 use zoning designed on the shoulders of the small downtown district should be preserved for its core economic health, livability and job creation. She requested the council require that businesses and jobs remain in this small BD2 zone. There is already more multifamily square footage allowed in this zone than business, once it is 100% gone, there is no room in the small downtown core to bring it back. She requested the council renew the moratorium and design standards for six months to get this right as there is no rush. 6. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS IN THE BD2 ZONE City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained two days ago the council adopted an ordinance to extend the moratorium through May 19'. However, because that ordinance passed on a 4-3 vote, it will not take effect until sometime next week. The moratorium ends today, so theoretically starting tomorrow building permit applications could be submitted that would vest to the existing design standards, zoning, etc. To the extend the council wants to prevent that from happening, the council has an opportunity at this meeting to adopt the ordinance in the packet that would, with at least five votes, take immediate effect and would also extend the moratorium until June 2nd. That date was chosen after consulting with the development services director to determine the amount of time that likely would be needed for the designated street front issue to be returned to the council for further consideration. Mr. Taraday continued, the idea is the council could extend the moratorium tonight through June 2nd and then take up the designated street front issue on May 17th and perhaps the following meeting, and still have N time to adopt an ordinance before the moratorium expires on June 2n1. Of course, as long as the moratorium Q is within the six month authority, the council has some discretion to extend it further, but staff does not a believe that it will take longer than June 2' to complete work on the designated street front. If it appears on May 17' that more time is necessary, the council could extend the moratorium again, but his understanding after consulting with the development services director is that it should come to council on z May 17d`. w c Mr. Taraday identified minor amendments that he suggested be made to the packet version. He referenced the draft extension moratorium ordinance on page 4, pointing out the title references both Ordinance 4253 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 21, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 244 8.1.d and 4254 (Ordinance 4254 was adopted on Tuesday). As Section 1 does not reference Ordinance 4254, he suggested a minor edit to Section 1 that would read, "...extended by Ordinances 4253 and 4254 ..." The second edit would add a whereas clause before the last whereas clause that reads, "Whereas Ordinance 4254 extended the moratorium throwh May 19`h, 2022 but did not pass with sufficient margin to take immediate effect; and. He apologized for the edits, but said with the moratorium expiring, they are necessary. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT DO NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED BY ORDINANCES 4253 AND 4254. Council President Olson said she was excited for the opportunity to pass this ordinance with a super majority and have it take effective immediately so there will be better design standards in place. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ATTORNEY, ADDING ORDINANCE 4254 IN SECTION 1 AND THE ADDITIONAL WHEREAS CLAUSE. Councilmember Buckshnis asked Mr. Taraday to send councilmembers the language he read for the additional whereas. Mr. Taraday shared his screen so councilmembers were able to read it and repeated the amendments, revise Section 1 to read, "...extended by Ordinances 4253 and 4254 ..." and add a whereas clause before the last whereas clause that reads, "Whereas Ordinance 4254 extended the moratorium through May 19`h, 2022 but did not pass with sufficient margin to take immediate effect; and. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-0), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, AND PAINE AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has either an amendment or a clarification. She referred to the 15t' whereas clause (WHEREAS, the history suggests that what was seen in 2011 as the logical limits of the downtown commercial core may no longer fit the circumstances of 2022 due to the fact that certain blocks are showing vibrant commercial activity right up to the edges of the designed street front map; and) and questioned why 2011 was used when the original Ordinance 3628 regarding BD zones was adopted in 2007. Mr. Taraday said it was most recently amended in 2011. Interim Planning Manager Kernen Lien said 2011 is the ordinance that adopted the current extent of the designated street front. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding it was updating Ordinance 3628. Mr. Lien agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis said in reading this, it is kind of judgmental and she preferred using logical v limits, fit the circumstances, etc. She questioned if that whereas clause was even needed. Mr. Taraday N pointed out a typo in that whereas clause; it should be "designated," instead of "designed." In his opinion N the whereas clause is helpful because it explains why the extension of the moratorium to June 2nd is r necessary; it is necessary because the council wants to reevaluate the designated street front map. That is essentially the primary reason for the proposed extension. He felt it was a helpful whereas clause, but Q recognized the council was free to amend. a Councilmember Buckshnis said now that Mr. Taraday had explained it, she was fine with it. She suggested a whereas clause saying the definition of the 13132 is mixed residential. She has yet to see where council has deliberated on the two options which were given to the council at the time of the B134 zones and wanted to w have language that states, "Whereas B132 always been recognized by council as mixed residential." Mr. Taraday answered the whereas clauses explain in essence the reasons for what the council is doing today, E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 21, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 245 8.1.d but do not prevent the council from taking action in future. He realized that some people may still disagree with the analysis provided regarding the BD zone. That whereas clause does not prevent the council from stating in the future that there is not going to be residential only structures anywhere in the BD2 zone. There are several ways to accomplish that such as drastically increasing the designated street front map, a map amendment, text amendment, etc. That whereas clause does not prevent the council in the future from doing what the council wants to do with residential structures. Councilmember Buckshnis said it was Ordinance 3918 that describes the subdistricts and BD2 is downtown mixed commercial. She would like to have a whereas in Ordinance in 3918 stating the BD2 zone is defined as downtown mixed commercial. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS/COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, TO ADD A WHEREAS CLAUSE THAT ORDINANCE 3918 DEFINES BD2 AS DOWNTOWN MIXED COMMERCIAL. Councilmember Buckshnis commented some councilmembers lived through this; she recalled former Councilmember Petso saying land use is permanent, you better be very careful with what you do. She has 13 read a lot of materials, she appreciated the work done by staff and Mr. Taraday, but in her opinion Ordinance 3918 was left out of the agenda memo and she felt it was a very important ordinance. The new moratorium a, addresses street fronts and defines building types. Ordinance 3918 defines BD2 as downtown mixed commercial. She had not seen any materials related to transition zones, etc. This further acknowledges that o there are a number of important ordinance related to the BD topic. c m Councilmember Paine said the whereas that refers to 2011 is the reason for extending the moratorium from E May 19th to June 2" d. She did not believe this new whereas clause adds additional clarity or a compelling story which is the reason for having clear whereas clauses. _ Council President Olson said the comment by Councilmember Paine was a fair point. She was the one that a noticed Ordinance 4254 was not referenced in the whereas clause and even though it didn't change anything, it did document the history and she felt the same about adding language regarding Ordinance 3918. It does not have an impact because the council can choose what they think is appropriate for the BD2 zone, but it documents the history and therefor it adds value. Councilmember Chen valued the history and the additional understanding via adding Ordinance 3918 to the proposed ordinance. a Mr. Taraday commented it is true that Ordinance 3918 was one of the ordinance that amended the BD c o' zoning code, but the language about downtown mixed commercial has been in code since 2008; it was not v amended by Ordinance 3918. It was not staff s goal in drafting the memo regarding the history to identify every ordinance that has amended any aspect of the BD zone. Staff s focus was on the ordinances they felt N had some relevance to the designated street front and the BD2 uses which is why Ordinance 3918 is not c referenced. He did not think there was any harm in referencing it, but it does not add much to explain why N the council was doing this. Ordinance 3918 was primary about building height and things like that, not N about uses or the designated street front. The red lines in the ordinance show where it was amended. L a a Councilmember Buckshnis read from Ordinance 3918, Whereas the following work sessions with the members of the ADB and Planning Board took place July 9, 2013, February 13 and February 27, 2013. She recalled it very clearly and she was sure Councilmember K. Johnson did as well and likely Councilmember z Tibbott. It defines the subdistricts, whereas the memo goes into the reasoning behind the street fronts; in w her opinion reference to Ordinance 3918 added a valuable piece of history. Ordinance 3918 was a pivotal year when the council was looking at the BD zones; some may not feel it adds value but she thought it did. m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 21, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 246 8.1.d UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER PAINE VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE Senior Planner Mike Clugston offered to review the language in the packet. Councilmember K. Johnson said the first step is to un-table this item so the council can discuss it. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON TO UN -TABLE THIS DISCUSSION ITEM FOR INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY ONLY BUILDING IN THE BD2 ZONE. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said he included a recommendation in the agenda that the council not un-table the motion as it will be a much easier process to move the ordinance in packet. Otherwise a number of amendments would need to be made to the ordinance that the council tabled. If the council prefers to start where they left off on Tuesday, that is certain the council's prerogative. Councilmember K. Johnson asked for further clarification, advising she did not see the recommendation to not un-table the item and she did not understand how the council could discuss it without un-tabling it. Mr. Taraday relayed the recommendation to move the ordinance in the packet. Tuesday's motion was to move the ordinance in that packet. They are not the same ordinances and the council's deliberation would be much more straightforward if the council began by moving the ordinance in the packet. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding that by not removing the item from the table, it would be tabled indefinitely. Mr. Taraday agreed, explaining there is no obligation to ever remove something from the table. His intent was to provide the most streamlined process; the ordinance in tonight's packet will be the best starting point for council's deliberation and starting anywhere else will make deliberations more complex. He recommended leaving Tuesday's ordinance on the table and starting deliberations with the ordinance in tonight's packet. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND-ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4253. Councilmember Tibbott said staff did a good job of capturing the essence of Tuesday's conversation and 0. a he agreed with the language used to describe the design standards. He will support ordinance. Councilmember Paine said she will support this ordinance and hoped it would be sufficient for as long as z it was needed. She hoped the feasibility study regarding the needs of either commercial businesses or x w residential in this part of town would be completed prior to the moratorium's expiration on June 2nd. She will support the interim ordinance, expressing her preference to have moratorium lifted well before June m 2nd E t t� R Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes r Q April 21, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 247 8.1.d Councilmember Chen asked for clarification on design standard D, some roof modulation is required with preference for step-down that follows the slope when slope exists. He asked if that affected the building height. Mr. Clugston answered this was offered as an amendment on Tuesday. It does not affect the maximum height in the zone which is still 30 feet for the BD2 zone, but requires some roof modulation and step-down is one of the option. Councilmember Chen asked if the roof modulation referred to the same building or separate buildings. Mr. Clugston answered it would refer to two separate buildings, As the slope steps down, there would be roof modulation between the buildings and the intent is that each building would have some roof modulation. That could be achieved via a step-down or other ways. Councilmember Chen summarized the intent is for the view from the higher building to not be blocked by the building lower on the slope. Mr. Clugston said he did not know if that was the intent of adding this standard. If there is a slope, the buildings would step down the slope and there would be opportunity to modulate the roof. Councilmember Chen expressed support for the ordinance. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Exhibit A, Chapter 22.43.080, was adopted as part of this ordinance. Mr. Taraday answered yes. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, ADD TO THE END OF SECTION A, INTENT, "AND COMPLY TO HUMAN SCALE BY VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL MODULATION." Councilmember Buckshnis said a builder with over 20 years' experience indicated using "compatible within the downtown area" could result in a big block building and suggested adding human scale. The intent of the amendment is to take vertical and horizontal issues into account. She recall Councilmember Tibbott asking about that relative to the post office building. Councilmember Paine asked if an addition to the intent helped describe what was required or was that accomplished via the specifics regarding materials, private amenity space, street site amenities, roof modulation, landscaping, etc. Human scale is subjective depending on context. Adding human scale is a broader discussion that should be reviewed by the planning board and ADB to ensure they are comfortable with adopting that because they would need to review against it. Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin answered this section will be a subsection of the broader design standards. The intent and purpose of those design standards already articulate human scale, keeping with the historic nature of downtown, repeating historic patterns, vertical and horizontal modulation, etc. so it would be redundant. Having an intention statement identifies the outcome once all the design standards are rolled up. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, N TO AMEND SO THE TITLE OF THE ORDINANCE READS, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF N EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS a THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. , AND —LIFT-ING—THE Q MORATORIUM THAT- WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCE . AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. z COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, w TO AMEND ITEM 2 RELATED TO BALCONIES, TO ADD AT THE END OF THE FIRST SENTENCE, "DECKS ENCROACHING INTO SETBACKS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO THE SECOND FLOOR ONLY." t Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 21, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 248 8.1.d Councilmember Buckshnis commented it is important to understand that decks encroach on the vibrancy of the City because it is part of the common space. Therefore, she wanted to ensure that decks that encroach into the setback were limited to the second floor and up. Councilmember Paine assumed all decks would on the second or third floor and she did not understand what this amendment would change. Most likely decks would encroach, but not beyond 5 feet. Councilmember Buckshnis provided an example, pointing out on the post office building part of it is commercial and she considered the patios to be decks. Mr. Clugston explained the intent of the standard was balconies are on the second and third floors of buildings and can project out or be built into the building; decks and patios are at the ground level which is why two different standard distances were proposed. On the ground level, they can project into the 15 foot setback by 10 feet and balconies on the second and third floors can project a maximum of 5 feet. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 6:11 p.m. z x w c m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q April 21, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 249 8.1.e several issues, some it can control and others likely not, including the environment, increased transportation requirements and emergency management. This process will take time and several to stakeholders are effected including governments like the City and Port, the Washington State Department 14 of Transportation, Ferries as well as private entities and each have various requirements and objectives z° including determining the waterfront of the future. The waterfront is one of the City's gems, visited by thousands each year. How a person enjoys the waterfront is very personal; the Edmonds waterfront he c enjoyed as a kid is very different from today's waterfront and collectively the stakeholders need to c determine what they want it to be in the future. Each of the waterfront stakeholders plays a significant role and realistic solutions need to be identified for some of the challenges. The Port of Edmonds E contributes greatly to the waterfront, as an environmental steward, a place for citizens and guests to enjoy, and the economic impact it brings to the City as one of the most significant tax contributors. The Port is committed to working with the City and other stakeholders in this process, expecting a cooperative and collaborative effort that addresses the best interest of all. c Marlin Phelps said if there was someone in the community who grew up here, went to college, came back and did something of great substance to which a younger generation wants to emulate her, something very good has been done, a legacy. He commented Edmonds is a fine city with a fine city council. He relayed in 2015, Judge Linda Coburn gave an order to have a private inspector work for him, unsolicited, which he thought was odd but he was grateful. The inspector ran a PUD list of where his wife of 10 years had lived and none of it was close to what he had known to be true. He goggled her, looked at several background check websites, found his name and her kids' names, but her employer is a law firm Honigman, Miller, Quartz and Cohn. He was being persecuted and had good story, so he called 50 law firms, and the only one that returned his call was Honigman, Miller Quartz, Cohn so he knew there was a connection. U.S. Senator Carl Levin then abruptly retired, became the managing lawyer of that law firm. Meanwhile, he received a letter from Maria Cantwell offering her help. Senator Levin was Maria Cantwell's mentor in the senate. He referred to the murder of Tom Wells, the path of righteousness, and finding out who killed him, something that is well within the City's rights and is why municipal courts were invented. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, commented she had little time to prepare because the BD2 agenda item was recently changed and Friday's packet did not contain some of the information being presented today. She pointed out BD2 has the label downtown mixed use commercial, a separate district from all the other BD w zones because it is complimentary to the BD zone, especially BD ground floor street front which only allows businesses with open door policies, not by -appointment businesses unless they are grandfathered c' in. BD2 allows offices such as accountants, lawyers, doctors, dentists, medical, acupuncture, counseling, tutoring, etc., businesses that provide services not permitted in BD 1 and providing a symbiotic relationship. BD4 is labeled downtown mixed residential which the proposal is trying to turn BD2 into. She questioned why BD2 was called mixed use commercial when the zones were created instead of 0 saying it is all BD4, downtown mixed use residential. She expressed concern with doing this hurriedly and having outside people evaluate what is best for Edmonds. Multifamily is being constructed v throughout Edmonds; the zones considered did not include all the multifamily downtown such as up on N the hill, on 3', 2' or 5'. She referred to the book, Building a Vibrant Community, and a statement in the N book about not rushing things and not thinking that what is good for one city is good for another. She N questioned whether the goal was to build a vibrant city for Edmonds, that considers walkability, use of > services, and that leads to using retail and commercial. Jack Malek, Shoreline, a Windermere relator, spoke regarding BD2 Designated Street Front. He has a listing for the Soundview Plaza on 2" d & James; the suggested extension is in front of 2" d & James which x he opposes. The market study favors residential; allowing mixed use and a more robust ability to adapt to w different economies is a smarter choice. He suggested a fully residential building could be allowed with c the option to use the ground level for commercial in the future to allow for fluctuating market conditions. E z c� r Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 250 8.1.e Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments. W N 14 Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, referred to the tree ordinance, explaining Edmonds has taken the rights and worth of their trees, making the building and safety of their homes infeasible with regulatory and monetary takings. The intent seems to be to decrease the value of vacant property so the City can acquire it at lower prices for their tree agenda. Edmonds has 35% tree canopy but only 2% buildable vacant land in single family zones. She questioned whether it was necessary to punish those needing and providing housing. In 2017, she and her family found a beautiful, sloped 1.25 acre property with trees to build homes for themselves and her then 82-year old parents. They hired a geotech whose reports verified there was no critical area, and water retention and soil integrity on the sloped property was so strong, he certified no risk of slides in the next 100-200 years. The report was provided to Edmonds planning who assured them there was no obstacle to dividing the property and they purchased it. After purchasing, Mike Clugston advised dividing would be difficult with the small wet corner that is a landslide risk area; he did not reveal this before. With his encouragement, they gave the corner to the neighbor, a process that took two years, and were then ready to apply for division in November 2020, the week the Edmonds city council halted applications to write tree codes requiring exorbitant tree fees and more work from their engineers and arborists. On June 22, 2021, Edmonds council voted to take ownership of every tree on all vacant, private properties, violating the constitution's takings clause. Before division is permitted for single family homes, payment of $3,000412,000 for each tree needing removal must be made to the City. Ms. Ferkingstad continued, they have applied for division retaining 50% of the trees, forfeiting safety and mountain and sound views. The City's response letter states all trees retained on private property become the City's protected trees involuntarily and indefinitely. When the property is sold, no trees rights remain for homeowners. In the event a tree is damaged, arborist appraisals are still required for every tree, at a costs of $200-$300 each along with a list of replacement trees and planting locations or payment of an additional $2500 for each tree in addition to the worth of each removed. An attached drawing showed about 40% of their property is now classified as untouchable critical area, shocking their geotech. Trees in this area would not count toward the 30% open space or tree retention. She relayed Kernen Lien's explanation that if 50% of trees are retained, trees in critical area count toward retained trees. If less than 50% are retained, trees in the critical area do not count and additional trees must be retained, plus fees of over $107,000. She urged councilmembers to let them build their homes without the unconstitutional [inaudible] only upon vacant land owners and future homeowners. The Edmonds tree ordinance violates the 5th and 14' amendments and takings clause of the U.S. Constitution, the Washington State Constitution, the Growth Management Act, and the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. She requested the council reconsider and rescind the tree ordinance. Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, spoke regarding Ordinance 4079, the 2017 upzone of the SR-99 and park mitigation. In 2017 the City promised to improve the park system within or near SR-99 to address geographic gaps in service. Specifically, the City promised to expand and partner with the Edmonds v School District. This was always a bit of a false commitment as there are no Edmonds schools in the SR- N 99 area. Second, explore property acquisition and development and partner with neighboring and N overlapping jurisdictions to expand recreational opportunities for the community. By and large that did N not happen with the exception for the Uptown Market last year, no acquisition and no improvements since 2017. Chase Lake is not in the SR-99 area so another false commitment. Third, acquire park land in the SR-99/104 area to provide adequate park services in redeveloping areas, create new civic spaces to enhance investment and revitalization while meeting recreational needs especially where service gaps exist or high residential impact is planned. That clearly did not happen. Defining the best routes and x treatments to create pedestrian and bicycle corridors did not happen. Increasing connections to the w Interurban Trail using signage, sidewalks, curb extensions and other pedestrian and bicycle enhancements c focusing on crossing Highway 99; the City did not even include the Interurban Trail in the bicycle E z c� r Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 251 8.1.e improvement plan. Strongly considering the formation of a Metropolitan Park District; again, did not happen. Broken promises from the past five years not fulfilled in the draft PROS Plan. One new W proposition with only a $1.5 million budget will be less than 1 acre and will not provide adequate service 14 for residents living in the area with the growth and existing land use applications let alone what is planned z° over the coming years or make up for the historic inequity in service provided to this area. d Ms. Seitz continued, those living in the area pay increased property taxes associated with higher land values in the SR-99 area which the City caused despite the upzone so the expensive property excuse is not valid because residents already pay higher taxes to offset higher acquisition costs. All the park mitigation in Ordinance 4079 is feasible if the City stops diverting their revenue to downtown. The PROS Plan CFP demonstrates the City does not have the will to mitigate development impacts because they are not identified in the PROS Plan as promises made to this area. With the over $41 million of investment identified for downtown compared to the less than $4 million for SR-99, the City is not creating spaces for these commitments to occur. Section 5B of Ordinance 4079 identifies that planned action ordinances shall be reviewed no later than five years from the effective date by the SEPA responsible official. The assumptions made by the environmental impact statement are not relevant because the City did not undertake the required mitigation and is not planning to. August 2022 is the timeline for this review; she requested the City perform outreach and engage the SR-99 community in the SEPA responsible official's review of the EIS. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, asked whether any of the apartments proposed in BD2 would be designated for lower rent housing. Next, she did not want streateries to return to Edmonds, noting there were other options for outside dining. She was interested in having things done to the right-of-way on Highway 99 to improve safety. She supported construction of a parking garage in downtown Edmonds, envisioning it would solve a lot of problems. She did not object to closing Main Street occasionally such as once a month in the evenings, but she did not support an open pavilion with no parking. Something needs to be done about all the crime on 80t' and 76t''. Arisha Ko, Edmonds, described her family's circumstances over the past 16 months. Her parents are immigrants from Hong Kong and she is the first generation to go high school and university. They are trying to open a family business restaurant in Edmonds near Highway 99. Her 75-year old uncle has been helping her dad realize his dream of opening a small business noodle shop. Unfortunately, their general contractor's construction estimate of $138,000 went up to $400,000 with equipment. Her family will be borrowing those funds from their uncle. They trusted the contractor to do the work, but he did not finish the fire alarm system and they failed their firm alarm inspection. The contractor hired a lawyer to sue them and for the past 16 months they have been unable to afford to pay for the fire alarm system. As a result, her family has been struggling with mental health issues, including her father with anxiety disorder. They want to open a noddle shop, Harvest Wonton Noodle, in Edmonds. 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17, 2022 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17, 2022 x 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT w c 4. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE E PAYMENTS c� r Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 252 8.1.e With regard environmental impacts, Council President Olson said the City has been aware of creek impacts and downstream stormwater issues for decades and this is an opportunity to deal with some of W those issues. With regard to the WWTP, perhaps some of the funds could be used to address the new 14 environmental requirement/standard that the WWTP is being held accountable for. Retention of WWTP z° employees is a real issue and has been on the City's radar and would be money well spent. The nonprofit d allocation was underfunded in the last funding allocation. She encouraged councilmembers to share their thoughts regarding this opportunity. c Councilmember Paine suggested when this comes back to council, hearing more about green infrastructure related to global warming and climate crisis. She was also interested in hearing from directors about their progress on opportunities such as the Perrinville Creek watershed and making a lasting impact. She was interested in lessening the burden on carbon fuels that are completely destroying the planet. The council also needs to hear about projects that are already underway. With regard to providing funds to nonprofits, she was interested in hearing about nonprofits' needs. Some nonprofits have other funding streams from ARPA; for example, the Edmonds Center for the Arts has some terrific funding sources. She was also interested in supporting human services and ensuring Edmonds is funding its fair share and taking advantage of collaborative programs with neighboring communities. Councilmember Chen said his priorities are small businesses and family relief. There are many small business who are struggling such as those in Plum Tree Plaza who were negatively impacted by a fire and some are still looking for space and recovery. He referenced the comments by during Audience Comments regarding Ms. Ko's family's struggles. Many of the services provided to residents are offered by nonprofits and they should not be forgotten. A third priority is a homeless shelter and wraparound services. Last week the council passed a compassionate enforcement ordinance; now it is up to the council to follow up by provide the necessary services and shelter to make the ordinance better. The environment is also important; flooding from Perrinville Creek needs to be taken care of. Councilmember L. Johnson reported she recently learned the City of Kenmore made affordable housing their #1 priority and have discussed dedicating half of their ARPA funds toward 100 units of affordable 30% or below AMI. She hoped Edmonds would explore that. She also supported fully funding human services and fully funding Edmonds's share of short term shelter and not simply relying on other cities to provide it. 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. BD2 DESIGNATED STREET FRONT Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin commented there is some urgency to lifting the moratorium. The last time this was discussed, council was exploring the possibility of extending the designated street frontage. Staff wanted to ensure council understands the implications of doing that, what a market demand analysis says, and will present that information tonight. Mixed development is definitely supported by the comprehensive plan as is residential development. This will offer transparency to what the market wants to do and what the implication would be in terms of extending street frontage or not in meeting comprehensive plan goals. She apologized for the late arrival of agenda materials, acknowledging it was a lot to process overnight Interim Planning Manager Kernen Lien reviewed: • Recap o Multifamily Building Permit Moratorium Ord. 4247 adopted to address insufficient design w standards for multifamily only building in the BD2 zone o Moratorium extended three times —Ordinances 4253, 4254, and 4255 E z c� r Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 253 8.1.e o Interim Design Standards for BD2 properties outside the designated street front that allowed multifamily only were adopted April 29t' with Ordinance 4256 c`Vo o Led to discussions regarding BD allowed uses and designated street front 14 o Council indicated a desire to explore expanding the designated street front z • Potential Designated Street Front Designation � Designated Strcel Fran! � � 6ALEY ST Av J r -- t 4~ � sni • eR[L = TELL ST ,-.FT��. .:. .. __ Spit p01 'a 5 a ALDER ST 1 Si Al kDl SI �r Tr, fn--� i Bn3 n s. ELL IAt � ncNo.0 LY vr.n t0.Ne a F EREER DR o Councilmembers voiced interest to have commercial office to support retail core o Legislative history favored pedestrian activity and commercial uses on both sides of the street as part of the original designation o Solid blue line = designated street front current in the zoning code o Light blue = potential areas for expansion of the designated street front ■ 6' Avenue & Main down to Dayton ■ On Sunset, extending 2nd Avenue to James Street ■ Dayton & Third • 16.43.020 Uses Table o Clarify ambiguities o Fill in blanks in uses created by Ordinance 3955 o Reference ground floor in ECDC 16.43.030.B for locational requirements • Comprehensive plan: Supports a mix of land uses o Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal E, E-1 ■ Provide for a strong central retail core ... while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. ■ Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial, and cultural activities. • BD Zone Purposes — ECDC 16.43.030 o ...Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 254 8.1.e Designated Street Front — key differences o Must be commercial use within first 45 feet of designated street front N 0 12-foot minimum ground floor height in BD2 (15 feet in BD 1) 14 o Different design standards c z Market Demand Analysis o Would designated street front restrictions inhibit market demand for residential development? cc o Is there existing market demand for mixed commercial buildings? 5 o Is there market demand for solely commercial buildings? 13 Market Analysis Area E o Target Area 1: Edmonds BD1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 designated areas, defined by blue outlined areas, focus of commercial analysis c o Target Area 2: Expanded search area around downtown core area, defined by yellow 0 Commercial Space Demand Data RETAIL MARKET Current Average days on Market All SF types of Spaces available spaces DOM Historical days on market — last 3.5 years N/A 255 DOM (historical) General retail 5 276 DOM (current) Vacant — not listed: C'est La Vie 1 N/A Business appears closed — not listed: 1 N/A Bop N Burger OFFICE MARKET Current Average days on Market All SF types of spaces available spaces (DOM) Historical days on market — last 3.5 years N/A 230 DOM (historical) 1000 to 2000 sf spaces are what currently 7 307 DOM (current) is available o Closeness of the historic and current DOM is an indicator of a stable market. Inventory is low in retail sector but not considered a leasers market o Retail is the stronger of the two commercial uses based on DOM Multifamily Rental Units Demand o Approximately 425 MF rental units in study area ■ 56% Two -bedroom Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 255 8.1.e ■ 34% One -bedroom ■ 10% Studio and Three -bedroom 0 1 % vacancy rate in the study area ■ 5 —6% vacancy rate considered strong and balanced market ■ Average DOM approximately 20 days o Biggest takeaway from multifamily information is short supply and high demand of rental units o Study did not look at affordability of units, low inventory drives up rents, limiting who can live in the downtown Edmonds area. Mr. Lien explained the analysis also looked at types of development that occur: • Option 1 — Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning/Residential Option 3-Story over below grade parking o Residential Units �a:1=U•1 ■ 2 BR: 7 ■ 3 BR: 3 ■ Total:22 o Garage parking (1 stall per unit required): 22 o Building height: ■ Garage below level ■ First floor: 9' ■ Second floor: 9' ■ Third floor: 9' ■ Parapet: 3' ■ Total Height: 30' Option 2: Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning/Residential Option 3 story o Residential Option ■ 1 BR: 6 ■ 2 BR: 6 ■ 3 BR: 3 ■ Total: 15 o Garage parking at grade (1 stall per unit required): 16 o Building height: ■ First floor: 10' ■ Second floor: 9' ■ Third floor: 9' ■ Parapet: 2' ■ Total Height: 30' Option 3: Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning/Commercial Option 2-Story o Commercial: 1900 square feet o Residential Option ■ 1 BR: 4 ■ 2 BR: 2 ■ 3 BR: 2 ■ Total: 8 o Garage parking (1 stall per unit required): 12 o Building height: ■ First floor: 12' ■ Second floor: 8' ■ Parapet: 2' N W N 14 c d z c� r Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 256 8.1.e ■ Total Height: 2' o Note: Financial feasibility of a 2-story with commercial may be questionable. Third floor to may not be feasible due to 30' height limitation and specific site constraints 14 Examples of three story development with below grade commercial entrance c z 0 307 Bell Street 0 2' & Main (Post Office) Conclusion of market analysis cc 5 o The risk associated with the long absorption time for retail spaces coupled with the drastic L- 0 reduction in rental residential units would make mixed use projects not feasible for the E average boutique developer. Recommendation c o Given that the current designated street front map is consistent with the comprehensive plan and BD zoning purpose, staff does not recommend extending the designated street front o Adopt amendment to ECDC 16.40.020 use table which clarifies ambiguity within the code �i 19 Councilmember Paine commented there are new properties coming on line in BD 1 that are all commercial. The analysis recognized it is not a big zone and she asked how having commercial space in BD 1 would impact BD2. Ms. McLaughlin referred to DOM and the absorption rate and how it factors into the proforma for developers making those decisions. A solely commercial building has the lowest absorption rate. Given the increase in commercial from Main Street Commons, the report mentions that may dilute the absorption rate potential for commercial. It is important to differentiate between commercial and retail, commercial office, which is allowed in the BD2 zone, has the lowest absorption rate. Retail has a positive absorption rate, however, the Main Street Commons presents a question whether it will dilute the historic absorption rate. Council President Olson commented the council had been waiting for the market analysis; it was not intentional for it to be added to the packet late. The intent was to have this on last week's agenda, but that was not possible as the information was not yet available from the consultant. She agreed with the comps, Mukilteo and Snohomish, and she found the comparisons enlightening for Edmonds as well as for the other cities. One of the possible deficits in Edmonds compared to other cities is parking per unit; Edmonds is the only city with 1 space per housing unit versus 1.5-2 parking spaces per unit in other cities; even the smallest units have 1.5 parking spaces. Edmonds may want to evaluate that criteria. Council President Olson recognized the importance of what is happen with the Edmonds Commons and the addition of commercial property, but it is open door commercial property, it is all restaurants. The design of the BD zones was to have offices in the next ring. As downtown expands, having businesses and patrons for those businesses is appropriate. She referred to a written comment submitted to council regarding the idea of versatility and the ability to change the lower level from commercial to residential via a code change in the future if there is less demand for commercial. However, it does not seem appropriate to shortcut the BD2 zone today which is what would be done if the edge on the side of 6th at least is not captured. She remarked on the differential between the commercial absorption on 5t' heading toward Pine versus on Main Street. Ms. McLaughlin advised the exiting BD2 zone accommodates commercial, but the proposal the City o received was not commercial. It likely was not commercial because of the absorption rate and the risk to developers of building solely a commercial building and combining it with residential does not get the 'n residential yield to justify it due to DOM for a commercial tenant space. Some of the risk is if that mixed use development isn't feasible, development will not turn over. x w Councilmember Tibbott said his comments relate well to Council President Olson's comments. The spaces currently in the corners where consideration is being given to extending the street front are E z c� Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes r Q May 24, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 257 8.1.e currently commercial spaces that are rented and where businesses have been in existence for many years. As the downtown continues to grow and become more robust, the City will run out of that kind of space c`Vo in the downtown area. He had no reason to dispute the DOM that were presented, but recalled the spaces 14 at 2" d and Main filled up quickly with interesting and exciting businesses that the City was glad to have z° them. He anticipated the City would be glad to have commercial businesses in the areas where the designated street front was extended. There are a lot of ways to configure buildings and improve cc residential opportunities. c Councilmember Tibbott relayed one of his concerns was losing service space. Eliminating the ability for residents to walk to a service business instead of driving was a lost opportunity so he wanted to preserve those commercial space. There are many good examples of integrating commercial into a building that conformed with the parameters. It may not be ideal to step down into a commercial space, but when visiting one of those spaces recently, he found it very nice and people appreciate those spaces even if have to step down two steps. Councilmember K. Johnson commented all the information in the presentation was new to her as she had no time to read it prior to the meeting. In addition, it came to a conclusion very rapidly. She asked staff to review the conclusions again. Ms. Laughlin explained staff wanted to make sure if the designated street front was extended, there would still be developable lots given the market demand for mixed use development. The study found it could be more challenging to build a mixed use development with a residential component, literally because of the ground floor height requirement for commercial offices (12 feet) or retail (15 feet). Those requirements, combined with the City's 30 foot height limit, mean it is not possible to get enough residential units to ensure a return. The analysis concluded that long absorption rate to occupy commercial and retail spaces, coupled with the reduction in the number of residential units, means a mixed use project would be very challenging on these sites. Staff recommends not extending the designated street front, because there can still be mixed use development, commercial development, and residential development within the existing zoning and would allow the market to dictate. It is also consistent with the comprehensive plan and existing zoning ordinance. Councilmember K. Johnson how many closed door business are currently in the 6t' & Main development. Mr. Lien estimated 8-10. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if those eight businesses could be replaced. Ms. Laughlin answered staff is not the developer of this parcel; staff is looking at what the market is demanding and understanding the likelihood of what types of development they may see. The market analysis showed those types of businesses are more sluggish at the moment, but that's okay because when looking at the mix of retail, commercial and residential in downtown Edmonds, there is a very healthy market overall. The other good news is residential development will continue to boost economic development; the report states the City cannot go wrong with adding residences to a robust economy that serves retail and commercial which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. She summarized staff s goal is to offer transparency to the council with the market analysis and understand the implications. Staff is not developing this parcel and she did not want to be too hyper focused on that development in particular. Councilmember K. Johnson said she was trying to understand the implications of eliminating eight closed N door businesses; those businesses may not relocate in the retail core. Ms. McLaughlin suggested Cynthiacc Berne, Long Bay Enterprises, address that. Ms. Berne relayed her understanding there was a specific proposal for development on the northeast corner of 6t' & Main and there are currently two houses with commercial offices. She asked if Councilmember K. Johnson's question was if those offices were removed for a new development, would they find places elsewhere within downtown Edmonds to locate. x Councilmember K. Johnson said her question was whether those eight closed door businesses located on w Main Street would be able to find closed door business space in that area. Ms. Berne answered in the area c a� E z c� r Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 258 8.1.e they studied, which was not a full-blown study due to a limited area and limited time, there were spaces where those businesses could relocate in that core area. W N 14 Councilmember K. Johnson recalled citizens have complained about the scale of development. She asked if the frontage were extended and it was a mixed use development, would the building scale be less and more compatible with the adjacent residential areas. Ms. Berne answered that was a complicated question; a lot of analysis goes into developing property. That could possibly be the case, but it could be commercial development on first floor, office or retail, most likely retail because offices do not like to be on the first floor, the rest would be residential. If the building was residential multifamily units or commercial on the first floor, depending on how it is designed, a developer could do a 3-story building with underground parking. She concluded the building could be exactly the same scale with or without commercial depending on how the developer analyzes the feasibility of the project. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if commercial was allowed in BD2. Ms. Berne answered yes. Ms. McLaughlin commented there could be a solely residential building. Councilmember K. Johnson said her question was whether commercial was allowed in the BD2 zone. Ms. McLaughlin answered yes. Ms. Berne asked if her question was related to commercial office or retail; commercial is a general category. Councilmember K. Johnson said she meant closed door businesses. Ms. Berne asked if that meant office and/or services. Councilmember K. Johnson answered yes. Ms. Berne said those are allowed in the BD2 zone. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if retail was allowed in the BD2. Ms. Berne answered yes, both commercial uses are allowed in BD2. Councilmember K. Johnson did not understand the conclusion not to designate the street front in that area. Ms. McLaughlin said the conclusion comes from the market analysis. Staff s recommendation pulls from that conclusion and the reason is because there can be a mix of uses, retail, commercial, residential under the existing zoning, Extending the street front designation would limit what developers can do and the City may not see any development in the near term. In terms of limiting the potential to build residential units downtown, staff thinks that's problematic given there is a very low supply and as the market analysis indicated only a 1% vacancy rate, a very high demand for residential units. Because of those implications, staffs recommendation is not to extend the designated street front. Councilmember K. Johnson asked if that recommendation was based on the 1% vacancy rate. Ms. McLaughlin advised it was based on the conclusion, the risk associated with long absorption time. If a building is required to be mixed use, either retail or office for the 45' depth in the BD2 zone, the absorption rate is quite lengthy so a developer would need to lean on the residential unit yield of the development to make it feasible. If the number of residential units is cut in half with this zoning change, that means a developer will likely not be able to make a mixed use development work. Ms. Berne commented this a very complex discussion on a very complex topic. There are no black and white answers; she has been a developer and developed projects throughout her career. She listed a few v factors that go into a development analysis. N 1. Absorption rate — this is a critical element of the pro -forma analysis that determines financial N feasibility (different types of pro forma analysis can be based on profit margin, internal rate of N return or return on investment). The absorption rate assumptions are based on historical DOM for the proposed use and projections as to what the future absorption could be. Absorption rates are directly related to the risk of the given project. 2. Cost of asset management after the project is complete — a mixed use project requires a more complete property management system than a single use project. x 3. The economies of scale — this is directly related to maximizing the highest and best use of a w property, which includes the greatest density possible to spread all the cost of developing and c maintaining the property over the greatest number of income -producing units. E z c� Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes r Q May 24, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 259 8.1.e 4. Construction costs — these vary significantly depending on the complexity of the site, the size of the development company itself, and the market cost of labor and materials. W N 14 Ms. Berne explained given the current market in commercial uses and residential supply, they considered what a developer would to build in the community and how would they look at it given assumptions they have to make. They will look at current absorption rates; the new retail space, Edmonds Commons, will be an indicator of how much retail the community can absorb. There are two large spaces in that development that have not been leased, one that is 4,000 square feet and another that is 1,900 square feet. If those remain vacant when it opens, that is an indicator there is not a huge demand for more retail development. Office space has softened, there is more available than there was in the last two years; it not a bad market but it is not a hot market. Their conclusion was a developer will look at the biggest demand in the community and that is residential. There is a huge demand for multifamily residential in the downtown area and there is very little supply. This only affects 21 lots in the BD2 zone, some of which cannot be developed individually and would have to be assembled. It is about 15 development projects that could include retail or office on the bottom floor or not. Mayor Nelson commented this agenda item had exceed the allocated 30 minutes. He asked when council was provided this packet. Ms. McLaughlin answered 7 p.m. yesterday. He commented when councilmembers publicly acknowledge they have not read the packet and now want full-fledged explanations, that holds up and delays everything else. He reminded councilmembers to come prepared so meetings can be more productive. Councilmember Buckshnis said providing council a packet at 7 p.m. last night was not a lot of time, but she read it. She acknowledged the highest and best use downtown would be an apartment complex. A lot of time was devoted to crafting the BD2 zone in 2013 and it is an offshoot of the BD 1 zone. She did not believe it should be changed. Ten businesses have been displaced; the other building purchased by this developer displaced several other businesses. Those business owners are upset and contacted her, but do not want to rock the boat. She wanted to keep BD2 as it is with the storefront. She referred to the Greggory building which was the first one with below grade commercial. She recalled the Spee property took about five years to get through council. The council has spent a lot of time on these designations. Sixth & Main is a main corridor where there is a lot of traffic. Councilmember Buckshnis acknowledged a lot people want to live downtown but the fact of the matter is 35% of downtown is already residential. Her vision was to retain the charm in Edmonds and that does not include allowing multifamily buildings in the BD2 zone. She referred to 39.80.018 which states BD2 is mixed commercial. The City's comprehensive plan is very outdated and still includes Edmonds Crossing. She wondered where the ten displaced business would go. Likely they would not be able to afford to locate in a new building due to increased rent. She preferred to honor downtown businesses and if the desire was to change the entire BD2 zone, it should be mapped out clearly and not spend less than two months trying to figure it out, getting a report at 7 p.m. last night and discussing such a hot topic tonight. She has received a lot of comments from people who are tired of talking about it because no one is doing anything other than trying to pushing this building through. Councilmember L. Johnson said listening to this discussion begs the question where is the concern over the housing shortage, an actual crisis, homes for people to live in, specially multifamily? She had yet to hear anything about a commercial or retail space crisis, yet the council's focus is on retail displacement without any actual facts. Her hairdresser was one of the displaced businesses and they found another location and she suspected others have as well. Councilmembers are referring to the displacement of ten x businesses when there are spaces available to absorb them. She referred to a councilmember's comment w that commercial in the downtown area gives residents an opportunity to walk to a service base; walking is c only possible if one lives in the general area, yet another bowl centric focus. There are many other areas E z c� Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes r Q May 24, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 260 8.1.e of Edmonds where services can be increased such as Highway 99; she suggested adding services there that are within walking distance, it does not have to be bowl centric. The analysis found absorption is c`Vo longer for commercial; vacant spaces do not create vibrancy, people do. People living in an area support 14 business. c Councilmember L. Johnson continued, this began as a concern with how the building looks; that can be addressed by the Architectural Design Board (ADB). Councilmembers keep throwing out other things, but are not interested in addressing the housing shortage. The council should be prioritizing multifamily, not fighting against. If it is a priority of council to increase commercial, although it should be a priority to increase multifamily, she suggested talking about increasing heights, something that was mentioned in the report but not discussed. In light of news reports about housing and the 1% multifamily vacancy rate in Edmonds, the council's roundabout discussion does not make sense, priorities are very mixed up and they do not address the need for housing. She reiterated the council should talk about increasing heights, what that would look like and what that would offer. Ms. McLaughlin commented an aspects of the report was to look at zoning challenges if the designated street front were extended, One of those challenges is the 12-foot floor height suitable for commercial office. Adding two floors of residential then bumps up against the 30-foot height limit. Sunken commercial office is challenging from both an absorption rate perspective and is not best practice for pedestrian friendly design as it is not accessible for people with disabilities and is more expensive. As the report indicates, the delta is only 2-5 feet; trying to mitigate for the sunken commercial office strategy and allowing developers to get 3 floors which pencils out for the mixed use development option. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to a statement that given the height restrictions, mixed use projects are not feasible for the average boutique builder. She asked if an additional 2-5 feet were allowed, would mixed use development be feasible for the average boutique developer. Ms. McLaughlin answered that is what the consultant team concluded. She recognized applying that to Edmonds was challenging. If that tactic would make mixed use development successful on these BD2 properties and council is willing to support it, that is a solid recommendation to get what we want, mixed use develop in the BD2 to support the retail core. Councilmember L. Johnson commented it is clear something has to give and she hoped it was not decreasing the availability of multifamily. To her a win -win across the board would be to consider a height increase and she hoped other councilmembers would consider that. Ms. Berne answered if the height were increased 2-2% feet, there would be a much more pedestrian friendly commercial spaces. She pointed out the different between walking down the older Main Street where everything is at eye level and very inviting compared to the below grade commercial spaces which are not as inviting and not artistically creative. An addition 2 feet would also result in more residential because the extra 2 feet would allow commercial with 2 floors of residential. The 30 foot heigh limit at one time meant 3 floors with 10 feet per floor. The below grade commercial has been an unintended consequence of the 30-foot height limit Councilmember Chen appreciated the study and the discussion, noting a lot of work was done in a short N amount of time. He referred to the conclusion, which relates to whether the development will work for the developer. He acknowledged developers are very important to the economy, but he preferred the study focus on Edmonds, whether extending the designated street front was good or bad for the City in the long term. Real estate and commercial markets fluctuate. He preferred the study focus on the outlook for the City and not what will work for the developer. x w Ms. McLaughlin answered that was where staff was coming from, what is the intent of the zoning code c and comprehensive plan. She agreed demands fluctuates; staff has done a thorough job of interpreting the E z c� Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes r Q May 24, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 261 8.1.e policies, zoning code and market demand, the conclusion is not based on a single parcel. All the parcels that extending the designated street front would apply to were considered and then the average was c`Vo factored into the analysis. She empathized the analysis did not focus on a particular parcel or 14 development; it is about the best approach for the City for the BD2 zone. The goal is to afford the most z° flexibility so it does not result in undevelopable lots thereby resulting in a de facto moratorium or lots that are developed and cannot be occupied (risk of vacancy). It is about balancing marketing demand as it fluctuates and giving developers the most flexibility moving forward. c Council President Olson remembered a terrific business, a drop in daycare operated by December Louis, commenting it would be amazing to have a daycare like that at the top of Main Street. She recalled the history of the 25 foot height going to 30 feet height was the 25 foot limit resulted in 2 story buildings with flat roofs. The height limit was changed to 30 feet to get pitched roofs, but now people are building flat roofs to get 3 floors. Mr. Lien explained the height limit actually came down. Back in the day, there was a 40 foot height limit downtown that was reduced to 35 and then to 30 feet in about 1980. What has changed over the years is what happens between 25 and 30 feet. There have been pitched roofs, modulation, etc. He summarized the 30 foot height limit has been in place since about 1980. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, THAT THE BD USE TABLE IN ECDC 16.43.020.A BE AMENDED TO CLARIFY THE AMBIGUITY IN THE TABLE AND THAT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT 5 TO AMEND DESIGNATED STREET FRONT MAP AND AMEND ECDC 16.43.020.A BE ADOPTED. Council President Olson stressed this is an interim ordinance. The council got this information really late, but the council needs to make a decision because the moratorium is coming to an end. There are a lot of moving parts; for example, looking at the designated street front map, it is appropriate to extend it on 6t' but it may be worth considering moving it north on 5" Avenue and allow more residential there. Since this is an interim ordinance, it will go to the planning board and there will be more public hearings, so the council should adopt something a little more conservative that protects the core. A lot of time, effort and thought went into establishing the BD zones and how they supported each other and in the next few months, these other things can be discussed with more public participation and participation by the experts on the planning board. For Councilmember Buckshnis, Council President Olson advised this was staff s recommendation in the original packet, not the staff recommendation provided today. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the motion, and recommended re -analyzing the BD zones. She believed what was done in 2013 was very thorough and comprehensive and she would like to retain mixed use commercial. Councilmember Paine did not support extending the designated street frontage for the reasons outlined tonight. BD2 allows for mixed use which means multifamily, commercial and all the options. The most j conservative methodology would be ensure developers and businesses are not impacted in ways the City N cannot recover from. The demand analysis states to have effective commercial, building heights would N need to be raised 2-5 feet and that current market conditions support multifamily housing. The City needs --i more housing in the downtown area; housing abundance and options are good for the community. She >, supported having more analysis done, but was not in favor of extending the moratorium or having a de `° facto moratorium. She supported having this considered in a broader way through normal procedures like multifamily design guidelines and zoning. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to comments about sticking with the original 2013 plan. That begs w the question whether there was a housing crisis in 2013 and what was the focus in 2013. Sometimes things need to change with the times and not get stuck in the past. This presentation was through and the E information, although provided late, was easy to understand; a councilmember only needed to read it and z c� Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes r Q May 24, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 262 8.1.e it pretty much explained itself although it may not have been the outcome some hoped for. With regard to analysis, no analysis is needed to understand the need for more housing; the need is clear, specifically W multifamily housing. A delay does not address the housing crisis, something the City needs to focus on 14 and it also seems like kicking can down the road. She did not support the motion. Councilmember Chen said he cannot support the proposal, not because he didn't not like it, but because he was confused. Within the same meeting, staff presented two conflicting recommendations, one is to extend and this one is not to extend. More analysis is needed. Ms. McLaughlin said staff did not recommend extending the designated street front in a previous agenda. Mr. Lien explained the ordinance in the packet was for council consideration. Ms. McLaughlin said the ordinance was prepared that way because at a previous meeting, it appeared the council wanted to go in that direction. Given the timeliness the moratorium, staff wanted to have that ordinance ready but wanted to share the implications of doing it so council could make an informed decision. Mayor Nelson clarified staff drafted an ordinance but did not recommend it. Ms. McLaughlin said staff s recommendation was not to extend; council asked for an evaluation related to extending the designated street front. Councilmember Chen asked if this was urgent or was there more time. Mr. Lien answered the moratorium expires June 2" d which is one of the reason the ordinance is in the packet. If council acts on the ordinance tonight, it will be in effect before the moratorium ends. The urgency depends on whether the council wants to extend the designated street front. It is possible to extend the moratorium again, but it has been extended three times already. Councilmember Chen concluded more study was needed including looking at the relationship to the City's development from a long term standpoint, not from the standpoint of one project. Ms. McLaughlin said the analysis studied all the parcels this would be applicable to approximately 15 parcels. Council President Olson referred to the agenda memo which states staff will provide a more specific recommendation at the council meeting on Tuesday. This was not the recommendation in the packet. The motion she made was in conflict with the recommendation made on the slide. Her recommendation is in the interim, stay the course, extend the designated street front on Main and through the process that follows, all of this will be revisited during the hearings. She asked it was better to adopt an interim ordinance rather than extend the moratorium or would it be better to extend the moratorium. Ms. McLaughlin agreed with a previous councilmember's comment that enough analysis has been done to know where this will land. At this point up it is to council in terms of the direction they want to go, vote to either extend the designated street front or not. Council President Olson clarified the motion on the table is to extend the designated street front and all the attachments to the ordinance in the original packet before the new information yesterday. For Councilmember L. Johnson, Council President Olson explained the motion is the last two sentences on packet page 196 in the staff recommendation section. That section also stated staff would provide a more specific recommendation at the council meeting on Tuesday. She restated the motion: THAT THE BD USE TABLE IN ECDC 16.43.020.A BE AMENDED TO CLARIFY THE AMBIGUITY IN THE TABLE. A DRAFT ORDINANCE IN EXHIBIT 5 WHICH AMENDS THE DESIGNATED STREET FRONT MAP AND AMENDS ECDC 16.43.020.A IS HEREBY MOVED. COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO 6 AMEND THE MOTION TO SIMPLY CLARIFY THE AMBIGUITY BUT NOT EXTEND THE DESIGNATED STREET FRONT. w Councilmember L. Johnson said obviously the ambiguity needs to be clarified, but as has been stated, the moratorium has been extended a number of times, the council has the information it needs to make an z c� Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes r Q May 24, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 263 8.1.e informed decision. Clarifying the ambiguity is necessary but she did not believe extending the designated street front was in the City's best interest. to N 14 Councilmember K. Johnson did not support the amendment although she supported the original motion. She clarified a misstatement during discussion, when she on the planning board in 2012, there was discussion was about 25 plus 5 feet not 30 feet. The height was never intended to be 30 feet, it was intended to be 25 feet plus 5 feet for articulation. Councilmember Paine expressed support for the amendment because there is new, good, data -based information and this is the cycle of market. This may have been what was needed in 2013 or 2008, but it is no longer those times. Not extending the designated street front would allow more multifamily housing, would not put the entire BD1 and BD2 in a moratorium, and offered Edmonds a lot more opportunity for vibrancy and participation in the marketplace. Councilmember Buckshnis did not support the amendment and will support original motion. Zoning is permanent for a long time; this is the result of a rush decision, targeted toward one parcel when it affects a larger area. From an interim standpoint, the 6th & Main parcel is very important to the downtown business area and the designated street map should be extended to allow commercial on the lower level. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING NO. Mr. Taraday pointed out the main motion is lacking specificity with regard to the map. Before the council votes, he wanted to ensure staff understood the map because there is not an amended map in the packet. He believed he understood what the maker of the motion intended and Mr. Lien described earlier in his presentation where the designated street front could be extended. Mr. Lien said the amended map is Exhibit 1, packet page 198. The ordinance contains a space for a public hearing date; a public hearing is required within 60 days of adoption of an interim ordinance. He recommended setting the public hearing date before the vote. July options include the 5th, 19th, or 26th. Council President Olson advised the public hearing would be held on July 19th UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mayor Nelson commented he did not believe the council would get to the Waterfront Study agenda item. 2. STORMWATER CODE (ECDC 18.30) UPDATE Interim Public Works Director Rob English introduced Rebecca Dugopolski, PE, Herrera Environmental Consultants, and Engineering Program Manager Jeanie McConnell. He explained this item was discussed in July 2021 and public hearings were held in September 2021. The project was delayed by a SEPA appeal and the resignation of the City's stormwater engineer. Staff is proceeding now that the appeal is complete and Herrera Environmental Consultants was hired to help with the process. Ms. Dugopolski reviewed: • Why the Update? o The Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit requires the City's development code to meet or w exceed Ecology's standards designed to protect surface water from being impacted by development E z c� r Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes Q May 24, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 264 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Community Services/Economic Development Director- Appointment Confirmation and Employment Agreement Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: Human Resources Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson Background/History After a comprehensive recruitment and interview process, Mayor Mike Nelson has selected Todd Tatum as his appointee to the regular position of Community Services/Economic Development Director. Upon the retirement of the Community Services/Economic Development Director at the end of December 2021, the City undertook the process to solicit applications for the regular appointment to the Community Services/Economic Development Director position. City staff conducted the required recruitment process. The position was posted on 11/08/2021 on the City website, professional organization sites, Association of Washington Cities job site, and Indeed. A total of 30 applications were received prior to the deadline for first review. An additional 10 applications were considered after the first review deadline. Of those 40 applications, 20 met the minimum qualifications for the position. Those who passed the minimum qualifications were then asked to submit written response to a supplemental questionnaire, 13 candidates completed this step of the process. After review of the written responses, 5 candidates were advanced for interviews. One candidate declined to interview. On 4/22/22 4 candidates were interviewed by a panel consisting of the HR Director, Parks & Recreation Director, and Development Services Director. The three candidates were then advanced for interviewed by the Mayor who then advanced all three for Council interview. Three candidates were interviewed by Council on 5/25/22. The Mayor solicited feedback from City Council prior to making a final appointment decision. Reference checks have been completed by City staff and the required background has been processed by the City's contracted third -party background check company. Mr. Tatum has passed all parts of the background and reference process. Staff Recommendation Considering Mr. Tatum's experience, education, background, and the results of his reference checks, Mayor Nelson seeks confirmation of the appointment of Todd Tatum to the Community Services/Economic Development Director position effective August 16, 2022 along with approval of the corresponding employment agreement. Packet Pg. 265 9.1 Narrative Attached is the employment agreement for Todd Tatum. This is the standard Director employment agreement for the City and there are no additional items included. Attachments: DRAFT Todd Tatum Employment Agreement 7.8.2022 Packet Pg. 266 9.1.a EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Todd Tatum (the "Employee") and the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (the "City"), to describe the terms and conditions of the Employee's appointment to the position of, and employment as, the City's Director of Community Services and Economic Development. WHEREAS, the City desires to employ the services of the Employee as the Director of Community Services and Economic Development of the City of Edmonds, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and as provided by the Edmonds City Code ("ECC"); and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City to provide certain benefits, establish certain conditions of employment, and to set working conditions of the Employee; and WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that the Employee is appointed by the Mayor, subject to City Council approval; that the Employee will serve at the pleasure of the Mayor; and that nothing herein is intended to modify the Employee's at -will status; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Employee to accept employment as the Director of Community Services and Economic Development under the terms provided herein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 1. Appointment and Effective Date In accordance with RCW 35A.12.090 and ECC 2.10.010, the Mayor appoints, and the City Council confirms, the Employee as the Director of Community Services and Economic Development for an indefinite term commencing August 16, 2022. 2. Qualifications The Employee affirms that he possesses the education, training and experience which are an essential condition of the Employee's appointment and employment. 3. Duties and Authority The Director of Community Services and Economic Development is a department head position with executive management responsibility for Community Services and Economic Development. As the Director of Community Services and Economic Development, the Employee will devote his full time and attention to faithfully perform the duties thereof, which include but are not limited to management of all activities related to the following: Under administrative direction, plans, organizes, controls and directs the Community Services and Economic Development functions and programs of the City; provides internal consulting assistance to the City's management and supervisory staff on a variety of Community Services and Packet Pg. 267 9.1.a Economic Development matters; supervises and evaluates the performance of assigned personnel. Directors are responsible for the operations of the departments and may delegate signing authority except as limited by the provisions of the Edmonds City Code or state or federal law. In addition, this position will perform such other duties as may be assigned by the Mayor. The Employee's position is FLSA-exempt and not eligible for overtime. It is recognized that the Employee must devote time outside the normal office hours to the business of the City. 4. Salary The Employee will be paid at Range 44, Step 5, which is an annual salary of $165,897.32 for 2022, and which will be pro -rated and paid in periodic installments consistent with the City's normal payroll procedures. This salary may be subject to step adjustments, market adjustments, and/or annual COLA adjustment, as determined by City Policy, City Code, the City Council and/or the Mayor. 5. Benefits Holidays and Leaves The Employee will be granted or accrue holidays, vacation, sick leave and other leave as provided in Chapter 2.35 ECC and City policy. The City has twelve (12) paid holidays, and the Employee will receive vacation leave at the rate of twenty-two (22) days per year. The Employee will be granted a bank of ten (10) days (80 hours) of vacation leave and five (5) days (40 hours) of sick leave at the beginning of his employment. The Employee will be eligible to use vacation and sick leave banks at the start of his employment. The Employee will thereafter accrue vacation and sick leave as provided in Chapter 2.35 EMC. The Employee is also entitled to twenty-four (24) hours of management leave per year. Insurance The Employee will be provided the same medical, dental, disability, life insurance and other insurance benefits as other management level employees. Retirement The Employee may elect to participate in one of the City's deferred compensation programs, and is required to participate in the Municipal Employees Benefit Trust (which is provided in lieu of federal Social Security) on the same terms as other City employees. These programs are in addition to the mandatory DRS-managed retirement plan, if any, applicable to the Employee's position. Automobile and Travel The Employee will be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary travel and business expenses in accordance with the City's reimbursable expense policy and state and federal law. 2 Packet Pg. 268 9.1.a Professional Organization and Development Within departmental budget limitations, the City will pay the Employee's annual dues for membership(s) in the professional organization(s) necessary for accomplishing the Employee's duties and responsibilities as Director of Community Services and Economic Development. 6. Performance Appraisals The Mayor will review the Employee's performance in February 2023 and each subsequent December thereafter. 7. Termination and Severance Pay The Employee is employed at -will, and the Mayor may remove him from the position of Director of Community Services and Economic Development and terminate his appointment at any time, with or without cause. The Employee is subject to a six (6) month probationary period. In the event the Employee is terminated either during probation or after, without cause, he will receive severance pay equal to three (3) months' salary and payment for any accrued but unused leave per Chapter 2.35 ECC. Employees removed and terminated for cause, including but not limited to malfeasance in office or conviction of a felony, will not be eligible for severance pay. In the event the Employee voluntarily resigns and gives at least two (2) weeks advance notice in writing, he will be paid at separation for unused leave as provided in Chapter 2.35 ECC. The Mayor may waive the notice requirement in the case of resignation due to health or family emergency. 8. Indemnification The City will defend, save harmless and indemnify the Employee as set forth in Chapter 2.06 ECC, or any amendment thereof, with respect to claims and/or litigation resulting from any conduct, acts or omissions arising from the scope or course of the Employee's service to or employment with the City. 9. Entire Agreement/Modification/Severability This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any other agreements, oral or written. This Agreement may be amended or modified only with the written concurrence of both parties. If any clause, section, sentence or provision of this Agreement is ultimately held invalid by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction, such invalidation will not affect the validity of any other clause, section, sentence or provision. 10. Notices Notices pursuant to this Agreement will be given, by deposit in the custody of the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Packet Pg. 269 9.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS: Office of the Mayor City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 EMPLOYEE: Todd Tatum 7726 19th Ave NE Seattle, WA 98115 11.Opportunity to Confer with Independent Counsel In signing below, the Employee expressly represents and affirms that the City Attorney was not acting as the Employee's counsel in drafting this Agreement and that the Employee had the opportunity to consult with independent counsel in reviewing and deciding to execute this Agreement. DATED this day of 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS EMPLOYEE Michael Nelson, Mayor Todd Tatum ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney E Packet Pg. 270 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The City Council appropriated $20,000 in the 2021 budget to assist in removing references to Edmonds Crossing from the Comprehensive Plan. The intent was for a targeted update to the Comprehensive Plan in 2021 to deal with waterfront, ferry terminal, Edmonds Marsh issues and related issues. However, the complexities of this planning decision warrant a more comprehensive look. Discussions about moving the ferry terminal to the Unocal property date back to the early 1990's. A central part of the 1994 Edmonds Downtown/Waterfront Plan included moving the ferry terminal to the Unocal site. This was also included City's Comprehensive Plan dating back to the 1995 Comprehensive Plan. The Edmonds Downtown/Waterfront Plan was updated again in 2004 and this effort incorporated into the 2004 Comprehensive Plan. This material and visioning from the 2004 Downtown/Waterfront plan has been carried forward in subsequent Comprehensive Plan updates and is in the Comprehensive Plan to this date. All the major planning efforts for nearly the last 30 years in the Downtown/Waterfront area has envisioned moving the ferry terminal to the Unocal site. 30 years of planning efforts vision cannot be eliminated simply by deleting the Edmonds Crossing reference from the Comprehensive Plan. The ferry terminal is a major feature of the waterfront, adding to the downtown character; the removal would impact traffic circulation, waterfront access, and economic development. If the ferry terminal is going to stay in its current location, a new vision of the waterfront must be developed. The 2024 Comprehensive Plan update is a major periodic update of the Comprehensive Plan and has been identified as the appropriate avenue for developing a new vision for the waterfront. Staff Recommendation Implement recommendations provided in the Waterfront Issues Study Memorandum provided in Exhibit 1. Narrative The purpose of this project was to identify strategic updates and high-level recommendations to be considered in the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to reflect new information about waterfront uses, needs, and issues. The Edmonds Crossing project, which proposed to relocate the Edmonds ferry terminal to the south end of the waterfront, is not recognized in the Washington State Ferries 2040 Long Range Plan and the Washington State Department of Transportation has made no recent efforts to advance it. The City's long-range planning efforts have been relying upon the Edmonds Crossing project for decades; the Comprehensive Plan currently includes 30 references and eight pages devoted to the project. Packet Pg. 271 9.2 The Edmonds Crossing project's effective cancellation also impacts future ownership and uses of key properties, restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh, transportation planning, and several other infrastructure and planning issues. This Waterfront Issues Project is intended to be the initial step in identifying needs and opportunities to incorporate into the Comprehensive Plan for the 2024 update. MAKERS architecture and urban design, with the help of Leland Consulting and The Watershed Company, conducted a thorough review of existing plans and studies, held numerous conversations with City staff, led an online open house/webinar with 37 participants, and interviewed nine stakeholder groups to gain a better understanding of the waterfront's current context, issues, and opportunities. Based on the project team's findings and discussions, the top preliminary recommendations include: Create a new vision for the waterfront (Recommendation 11.A). Addressing the effective cancellation of Edmonds Crossing is not as simple as deleting its name from the Comprehensive Plan, because the plan heavily relies upon the project for land use assumptions and resolving the at -grade railroad crossing conflicts. As part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, the City should engage the public to craft an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront area. The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires around land use and character within the framework of market realities and trends. The future use of the Unocal Property and planning for sea level rise should be special considerations in the visioning. See related Recommendations 1.13, 2.A, S.A, and 3.C. Recognize and support the Edmonds ferry terminal's current location (Recommendation 2.A). Develop new and more specific land use and transportation policies that recognize the existing ferry terminal and guide the City's approach to planning around the terminal. Prioritize Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration (Recommendation 4.A-B). Continue planning and funding of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project, including refined cost estimates, design, and flood mitigation planning. If the Unocal Property is acquired by the City, update the design of Willow Creek to optimize ecological outcomes. Plan for improved emergency management of the waterfront (Recommendation 7.C). Street closures due to train crossings are a continued problem, and emergency service west of the tracks remains at risk of disruption. In coordination with other jurisdictions, this issue requires further study and possible improvements involving capital facilities investments or new transportation infrastructure. Emergency management planning must be conducted collaboratively with organizations such as the Port of Edmonds, BNSF Railway, Washington State Ferries, Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. The full Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study Key Findings and Recommendations Memo is attached. Consultants and staff will present the complete findings at the Planning Board meeting and discuss next steps. 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update One of the main recommendations from the Waterfront Issues Study is to create a new vision for the waterfront area. This coincides with a major focus of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update to create a vision for the City of Edmonds. The Comprehensive Plan is the primary guiding document for the City of Edmonds; however, the current Comprehensive Plan lacks a clear overarching vision for the City of Edmonds as a whole. One of the first steps in the Comprehensive Plan update will be a visioning and scoping exercise that will help guide the Comprehensive Plan update. This will help focus review alternatives considered in the Environmental Impact Statement that will be developed with the Packet Pg. 272 9.2 Comprehensive Plan. The vision will continue to be refined throughout the update process and will include visions for individual areas of the city such as the waterfront area as well as for the city as a whole. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Exhibit 2: Edmonds Waterfront Presentation Packet Pg. 273 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study Key Findings and Recommendations Memo July 14, 2022 Executive Summary The purpose of this project was to identify strategic updates and high-level recommendations to be considered in the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to reflect new information about waterfront uses, needs, and issues. The Edmonds Crossing project, which proposed to relocate the Edmonds ferry terminal to the south end of the waterfront, is not recognized in the Washington State Ferries 2040 Long Range Plan and the Washington State Department of Transportation has made no recent efforts to advance it. The City's long-range planning efforts have been relying upon the Edmonds Crossing project for decades; the Comprehensive Plan currently includes 30 references and eight pages devoted to the project. 0 500 1,000 Feet Figure 1- Overview of keyproperde5 and projects in the Edmonds waterfront study area (MAKERS) The Edmonds Crossing project's effective cancellation also impacts future ownership and uses of key properties, restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh, transportation planning, and several other infrastructure and planning issues. shows the general relationship between key sites, features, and projects in the waterfront study area. a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 1 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 274 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo This Waterfront Issues Project is intended to be the initial step in identifying needs and opportunities to incorporate into the Comprehensive Plan for the 2024 update. MAKERS architecture and urban design, with the help of Leland Consulting and The Watershed Company, conducted a thorough review of existing plans and studies, held numerous conversations with City staff, led an online open house/webinar with 37 participants, and interviewed nine stakeholder groups to gain a better understanding of the waterfront's current context, issues, and opportunities. The findings are organized by sections 1-11 pertaining to each issue or project. Based on the project team's findings and discussions, the top preliminary recommendations in this memo include: Create a new vision for the waterfront (Recommendation 11.A). Addressing the effective cancellation of Edmonds Crossing is not as simple as deleting its name from the Comprehensive Plan, because the plan heavily relies upon the project for land use assumptions and resolving the at -grade railroad crossing conflicts. As part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, the City should engage the public to craft an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront area. The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires around land use and character within the framework of market realities and trends. The future use of the Unocal Property and planning for sea level rise should be special considerations in the visioning. See related Recommendations 1.B, 2.A, 5.A, and 3.C. Recognize and support the Edmonds ferry terminal's current location (Recommendation 2.A). Develop new and more specific land use and transportation policies that recognize the existing ferry terminal and guide the City's approach to planning around the terminal. Prioritize Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration (Recommendation 4.A-B). Continue planning and funding of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project, including refined cost estimates, design, and flood mitigation planning. If the Unocal Property is acquired by the City, update the design of Willow Creek to optimize ecological outcomes. Plan for improved emergency management of the waterfront (Recommendation 7.C). Street closures due to train crossings are a continued problem, and emergency service west of the tracks remains at risk of disruption. In coordination with other jurisdictions, this issue requires further study and possible improvements involving capital facilities investments or new transportation infrastructure. Emergency management planning must be conducted collaboratively with organizations such as the Port of Edmonds, BNSF Railway, Washington State Ferries, Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. Several technical studies are recommended to support comprehensive planning and economic development. Refer to the recommendation number to find information on each study. Study Recommendation Number Ferry traffic study 23 Unocal Property real estate appraisal 3.A Federal Railroad Administration quiet zone application 6.13 Hotel feasibility study 11.13 Comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront area 11.H Figure 2 - List of recommended studies Q City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 2 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 275 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Introduction Project Purpose The Edmonds Crossing project, which proposed to relocate the Edmonds ferry terminal to the south end of the waterfront, is no longer active. The City's long-range planning efforts have been relying upon the Edmonds Crossing project for decades. This change affects future ownership and uses of key properties; it also relates to restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh. The City undertook this project as a first step in examining the implications of this change at a fairly high level for the purpose of updating the Comprehensive Plan for the 2024-2044 planning period. This project also considered other major properties, infrastructure, and environmental elements in the study area. Memo Overview This memo contains the key findings, relevant Comprehensive Plan Policies, and preliminary recommendations for the 11 waterfront issues studied: Section 1 -The status of Edmonds Crossing.........................................................................................4 Section 2 - Ferry operations on the Edmonds -Kingston route.....................................................12 Section 3 - Unocal Property cleanup, property rights, and future land use ............................15 Section 4 - Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration efforts.............................................19 Section 5 - Flooding and sea level rise potential impacts..............................................................24 Section 6 - Railroad double -tracking project impacts and planning considerations ........... 28 Section 7 - Waterfront emergency access next steps......................................................................30 Section 8 - Edmonds Station access and improvements...............................................................35 Section 9 - Bus service improvements and light rail connections..............................................36 Section 10 - Port of Edmonds projects and properties...................................................................39 Section 11 - Land use and economic development opportunities............................................40 Section12 - Sources.....................................................................................................................................47 The key findings and facts in this memo were developed from the project's background research and public outreach efforts. Many of the facts are pulled from existing public documents and studies and from stakeholder interviews conducted with property owners, transportation agencies, and environmental interests. Stakeholders interviewed were the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Washington State Ferries (WSF), Sound Transit, Community Transit, BNSF Railway, Port of Edmonds, Tulalip Tribes, Save Our Marsh, JSH Properties, and Lund Consulting representing Chevron/Unocal. Following each set of findings, the consultant team's recommendations to address the major issues are listed. Most recommendations relate to updating the Comprehensive Plan, while some recommendations are for City -led actions and studies. x w a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 3 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 276 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 1 - Edmonds Crossing Key Findings The Edmonds Crossing project originated in the 1990s when Washington State Ferries (WSF) proposed a vehicle loading bridge over the Main Street railroad crossing. The City objected to that design, and a concept for a new ferry terminal on the south part of the waterfront was developed as an alternative. It would be located on the Unocal Property adjacent to the Edmonds Marsh (see Section 3) and on land occupied by the Port of Edmonds and Marina Beach Park. Conceptually, major elements of the Edmonds Crossing project would consist of a three -slip ferry dock, large vehicle holding areas, surface and structured parking, a new/relocated Edmonds Station and bus transit center, pedestrian access across the railroad tracks, daylighting of Willow Creek, and stormwater treatment. The project's most advanced milestone was a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) published in 2004. Figure 3 -Edmonds Crossing 'preferred alternative "from the 2004 FEIS Today, the Edmonds Crossing project, as originally envisioned and planned for, is effectively cancelled -0 with no signs of life. This is evidenced by: w • Edmonds Crossing has had no major plans, designs, cost estimates, or other project documentation published since the FEIS was released nearly 20 years ago x w • The Edmonds Crossing project is not included in the WSF 2040 Long Range Plan (published 2019) • WSDOT has no staff assigned to work on the project • WSDOT has no funding for the project, nor did the Legislature include the project in its major 2022-2038 transportation funding package (known as Move Ahead Washington) a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 4 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 277 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo • WSDOT has not identified any further transportation need for the Unocal Property beyond the agency's original intent to use the property for Edmonds Crossing, and the Legislature's official stance is that the City of Edmonds should be able to purchase the Unocal Property for the purpose of rehabilitating near -shore habitat for salmon (read more in Section 3) The WSF Long Range Plan says, "Edmonds multimodal terminal improvements are proposed in the long term." WSF staff have confirmed these improvements are undefined, they do not include the Edmonds Crossing project, and no alternative terminal relocation schemes are planned. The scope of the "multimodal terminal improvements" will be determined later in a community planning process. City staff report that ferry traffic issues associated with the existing terminal remain unresolved. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Excerpts, Policies and Recommendations Addressing the effective cancellation of Edmonds Crossing is not a simple task. The Land Use Element heavily relies upon the project for assumptions and planned actions in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center, and it has no policies on the existing ferry terminal. Therefore, each recommendation of Section 1 carefully considers how Edmonds Crossing should be unwrapped from the Comprehensive Plan. Unlike the other sections of this memo, here each relevant Comprehensive Plan passage is listed and immediately followed by an associated recommendation. Some passages are abbreviated for brevity, and the full Comprehensive Plan should be referred to for complete context. See Section 2 on Ferry Service for related recommendations. Land Use Element Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Plan Content (page 44): A number ofpublic plans and projects have been taking shape in recentyears, and these could have a profound impact on the future of the city's downtown/waterfront area. Some of these ongoing activities include... • Transportation planning to accommodate ferry traffic, including options fora reservation system, additional parking for ferry users, and the possible Edmonds Crossing multimodal project. The latter project would move the existing ferry terminal at the base ofMain Street to a new multimodal transportation center at Pt. Edwards. Recommendation 1.A. Update the bullet point to reference the existing Edmonds ferry terminal and remove reference to Edmonds Crossing. Considering adding a reference to WSF's future undefined multimodal terminal improvements at the existing ferry terminal, potential changes to holding lanes, and the planned three -boat service (see Section 2 for additional ferry information and recommendations). Downtown/Waterfront Vision (page 44). Taken together, the goals and policies for the t Downtown/WaterfrontActivityCenterpresenta vision for Edmonds downtown/waterfront. By actively w pursuing the ferry terminal's relocation, the City has set upon an ambitious and exciting course. It is a course that holds promise for the downtown/waterfront, but it is one that will require concerted action by the a) E entire community, including local, state and federal public officials, business groups and citizens. While the challenges presented in this effort are substantial, the possible rewards are even greater, for with its existing physical assets, future opportunities and the energy ofits citizens, Edmonds has the potential to create one a of the region's most attractive and vital city centers in the midst of magnificent shoreline setting. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 5 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 278 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 1.B. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference and update this Downtown Waterfront vision in a community engagement process as part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update. Since the Edmonds Crossing project is inactive, the updated vision should clearly articulate the community's desires for the area and reorient the community's desires for how the existing ferry terminal is integrated into the Downtown Waterfront. For further guidance on updating the vision, please see related Recommendations 3.C. and 11.A. Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center (page 45). Components of the overall vision for the downtown/waterfrontarea include: • The Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center pro vides convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto and ,bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal reduces negative impacts to downtown Edmonds while still providing a link between the terminal and downtown Edmonds. The project provides the community with varied transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. • Downtown is extended westward and connected to the shoreline bypositive mixed -use development as well as by con venient pedestrian routes. Redevelopment of the holding lanes and SR-704 is pursued after the ferry terminal relocates to Point Edwards. Recommendation 1.C. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference and update the Downtown Waterfront vision per Recommendation I.B. The update should consider that "negative impacts to downtown Edmonds" are currently undefined and possibly unresolved by the continuation of ferry operations in the current configuration. See also Recommendation 2.13 for a ferry traffic study. Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal B (page 46). B. I Future developmentalong the waterfront should support the continuation and compatible design of three regional facilities: Edmonds Crossing at Pt. Edwards; the Port of Edmonds; and the regional parks, beaches and walkways making up the public shoreline. Recommendation 1.113. Replace the Edmonds Crossing reference with the existing Edmonds ferry terminal. Clearly define what "compatible design" means for the existing terminal or remove that from the goal. See also Recommendation 2.13 for a ferry traffic study. Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal C (page 47). Continue to plan for and implement the Edmonds E Crossing multimodal transportation cen ter a t Poin t Edwards - pursuing the design, permitting, land w acquisition and development of the project, as resources allow. The completion of Edmonds Crossing will help address the competing needs of three regional facilities (transportation, parks and open space - including the Edmonds Marsh, and the Port of Edmonds) while providing opportunities for redevelopment x and linkage between downtown Edmonds and its waterfront. w r c C. I Utilize the Point Edwards site to its best community and regional potential by developing a multimodal transit center with compatible developmentin the surrounding area. In addition to the regional benefits arising from its multi modal transportation function, an essential community benefit is in removing intrusive ferry traffic from the core area which serves to visually and Q physically separate downtown from the waterfront. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 6 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 279 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo C.2 When feasible, establish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which provides con venient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto, pedestrians and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal should be planned to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds - such asgrade separation/safety concerns and conflicts with other regional facilities - while providing the community with unique transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. C.3 Extend Downto wn westward and connect it to the shoreline by encouraging mixed -use development and pedestrian -oriented amenities and streetscape improvements, particularlyalong Dayton and Main Streets. Development in this area should draw on historical design elements found in the historic center of Edmonds to ensure an architectural tie throughout the Downtown Area. Pursue redevelopment ofSR-704 and the existing holding lanes once the ferry terminal moves to Point Edwards. C.4lmprove traffic conditions by removing ferry traffic impacts from the downtown core. Recommendation 1.E. Revise goal C and subgoals C.1, C2., and C.4 to acknowledge the continued existence of the ferry terminal in its current location. The issues of Downtown ferry traffic, the railroad crossings, and multimodal transportation are addressed in other recommendations (respectively, see Sections 2, 6-7, and 8-9). Most of subgoal C.3 could potentially be retained as a higher -level Downtown/Waterfront Area goal since it does not necessarily rely upon Edmonds Crossing to be achieved. An updated Downtown Waterfront vision is needed per Recommendations 1.13, 3.C, and 11.A. To replace subgoal C.4, the updated visioning process should evaluate the extent of ferry traffic impacts on the downtown core and be addressed by the vision (see Recommendation 2.13 regarding a ferry traffic study). Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal H (page 49). H. I Improve and encourage economic development opportunities by providing space for local businesses and cottage industries and undertaking supporting public improvement projects. Ofparticularsignificance is the enhancement of economic development opportunities resulting from the Edmonds Crossing project and the enhancement of Edmonds as an arts and water -oriented destination. Recommendation 1.F. Update this goal to explain how the "enhancement of Edmonds as an arts and water -oriented destination" will occur with the existing ferry terminal in place. Downtown/WaterfrontActivity Center Multi -modal Transportation (page 49). Primarygoals of the Citys Downtown Waterfront Plan include integrating the downtown core with the waterfront, improving pedestrian access and traffic circulation, and encouraging mixed -use development. Current conditions limit t the city' ability to achieve these plan goals by making it difficult to move between the two areas, thereby w minimizing the value of the shoreline as a public resource and amenity while adversely affecting the potential for redevelopment, including greater public use. E c� Q City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 7 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 280 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo P u c E r s o U N U \ m.r -' CertcrN. Pbr [Part e[Eal.11np encken'. Lantllnp Corry PNfh M Park lsomh) � _ �.� Br.cNWfa Un0lnp \ � l Park(NPrtD) _ a .� O ParkDlnoe �\M\) Figure 15.• Integration of the Remaining Ferry Pier Structure into Surrounding Parks (page 49). Recommendation 1.G. Update the Multi -modal Transportation section to acknowledge the existing ferry terminal and update the Downtown Waterfront Vision. See related Recommendations 2.A, 11.A, and 11.G. Consider removing Figure 15 since there are no active plans to alter the ferry terminal or pier structures. Edmonds Crossing subsection (pages 49-55). The full text of these pages is not shown for brevity. Recommendation 1.H. Remove the multi -page Edmonds Crossing subsection. Relocate some of the text from pages 49-55 which remains relevant, as follows. 2015 Alternatives Analysis (page 52) The project remains the City's stated preference to resolve the many conflicts created by the at -grade railroad crossings at Dayton and Main Streets. Recommendation 1.1. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element, integrate a new preference to resolve the at -grade railroad crossing conflicts. See Sections 6 and 7 for further information and recommendations. Also, update the Downtown Waterfront vision per Recommendations 1.13 and 11.A. Short Term Actions (page 53).3. Improve the existing downtown rail station between Dayton and Main Streets in order to better accommodate inter -city passenger and commuter rail service, including provisions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and downtown. During the short term planning period, evaluate the feasibility and benefits of retaining a commuterrail and transitpresence downtown after the construction ofEdmonds Crossing. Recommendation 1.J. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element, relocate Short Term Action #3 and integrate the known Edmonds Station access improvements that are planned by Sound Transit (see Section w 8). Also update Short Term Action #3 to include bus transit connections to light rail stations (see Recommendation 9.13). E E c� a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 8 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 281 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Short Term Actions (page 53) 4. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area ,between 5R-704 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). Although Amtrak and commuter rail service will be included as a part of the Edmonds Crossing project, the City and transit service pro viders should examine whether a commuter rail stop can be retained between Dayton and Main Streets in order to provide improved service and stimulate potential redevelopment of the surrounding area. Recommendation 1 X Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference. As part of the Downtown Waterfront vision update (see Recommendations 1.13 and 11.A), the community's desires for the area between SR-104 and the railroad tracks should be determined and if a joint public/private development of this area is still relevant. See Section 3 for information and recommendations for the Unocal Property, and Section 11 for details on the current zoning and status of major properties like Harbor Square and Salish Crossing. See Recommendation 11.H regarding a parking study. Short Term Actions (page 53) S. Upgrade secondary downtown streets for pedestrians. Implement the city's public urban design plan and street tree plan while expanding public amenities and streetscape improvements in areas where these do not already exist. These improvements are particularly needed along Main and Dayton Streets in the area between downtown and the waterfront in order to improve pedestrian connections between downtown and the waterfront area. Pedestrian improvements shouldbe combined with traffic impro vement projects where applicable. 6. Continue to promote sustainable shoreline management and public access to the city's beaches, parks, and walkways. 7. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Brackett s Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina functions into the long term plan. 9. Encourage a variety of housing to be developed as part of new development and redevelopment of downtown properties. Housing should be provided to serve a diverse community, including single family homes, multi family apartmen ts and condominiums, housing as part of mixed use developments, and housing connected with live/work developments that could also encourage an arts -oriented communityin the downtown area. A special focus forarts-supporting live/work arrangements could be in the corridor and nearby residential areas linking downtown with the Edmonds Center for the Arts. 77. Develop 'gateways"at keyentrances to the downtown area which enhance the identity and sense E ofplace for downtown. Gateways should signal that visitors are entering downtown Edmonds, and w should include elements such as public art, landscaping, signage and directional ("way -finding) aids. Recommendation 11. The above short term actions are relevant without the Edmonds Crossing project and could be integrated elsewhere in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity w Center section of the Land Use Element, the Housing Element, and the Community Culture & Urban Design Element. E c� a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 9 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 282 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Long Term Actions (page 54) 3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development. 4. Continue to protect and enhance existing wetlands and continue to develop supporting non - intrusive interpretive trails and exhibits to help educate local citizens and visitors about Edmonds' unique ecosystems and natural and cultural history. 5. Continue development of 'necklace"ofshoreline parks with improvements, focusing on missing links in the parkand walkwaysystem. Retain and expand existing parks, providing linkages whenever property acquisitions or easements ,become available for public use. 6. Encourage the development of centralized parking facilities as part of redevelopment projects. Under the right circumstances, these types of facilities can provide an efficient mechanism for consolidating expensive parking improvements while freeing up land for more intensive and desirable uses that support local housing, commercial, and pedestrian activities. Public/private partnerships should be explored when the opportunity arises, both in private and public projects (e.g. the commuter rail station downtown). Centralized parking facilities could be built as part of master -planned mixed -use development. 8. Redevelop the area from the east side of5R-704 to the railroad tracks, from Harbor Square to Main Street, according to a mixed use master plan. This area could pro vide a significant opportunity for public/private partnerships Under the right circumstances, consolidated parking or a pedestrian/bicycle crossing to the waterfront could be possible as part ofa redevelopmentproject. Every opportunity should be taken to improve the pedestrian streetscape in this area in order to encourage pedestrian activity and linkages between downtown and the waterfront. Uses developed along public streets should support pedestrian and bicycle activity and include amenities such as street trees, street furniture, flowers and mini parks. Main and Dayton Streets should receive special attention for public art or art integrated into private developments to reinforce the visual arts theme for downtown. Redevelopment of this area should also take advantage of the ability to reconfigure and remove the ferry holding lanes paralleling SR-704 once the Edmonds Crossing project is developed. 10. New development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be designed to meet overall design objectives and the intent of the various 'districts"described for the downtown area. Recommendation 1.M. The above long term actions are relevant without the Edmonds Crossing project and could be integrated elsewhere in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element. An updated Downtown Waterfront vison, with community desires about development and redevelopment is need, per Recommendations 1.13, 1.K, and 11.A. See also Section 4 regarding wetlands and Edmonds Marsh, and Recommendations 11.G and 11.H regarding the waterfront walkway and waterfront parking. Master Plan Development planning designation (page 57) The waterfront area south of Olympic Beach, including the Port of Edmonds and the Point Edwards and multi modal developments. This area is recognized by master plans for the Port of Edmonds, Point Edwards, and the Edmonds Crossing project as described in an FE15issued on November 10, 2004. These areas are also developed consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, as it applies. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 10 Q Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 283 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 1.N. Update this this description of the Master Plan Development designation based on the outcome of recommended visioning process for the downtown waterfront and Unocal Property (see the recommendations in Section 3). Transportation Element Policy 6.9 (page 230) Locate and design a multi -modal transportation center and terminal to serve the city's needs with the following elements: • A ferry terminal that meets the operational requirements to accommodate forecast ridership demand and that provides proper separation of automobile, bicycle and walk-on passenger loading; • A train station that meets intercity passenger service and commuter rail loading requirements, and provides the requisite amenities such as waiting areas, storage and bicycle lockers; • A transit center with connections to major regional destinations; • A linkage between stations/terminals that meets the operational and safety requirements of each mode, including a link between the multi -modal station terminal to the business/commerce center in downtown Edmonds; • Safetyfeatures thatinclude better separation between train traffic and other modes of travel, particularly vehicle and passenger ferry traffic as well as the general public; and • Overall facility design that minimizes the impact to the natural environment, in particular the adjacent marshes. Recommendation 1.0. Edit this policy with the assumption that the City is recognizing and supporting the ferry terminal in its existing location. Incorporate or update policies elsewhere in the plan that refer to all of these objectives. See Recommendation 2.A regarding ferry facilities, Section 8 regarding train service, Section 9 regarding bus service, Section 7 regarding separation between train traffic and other modes of travel, and Section 4 regarding the Edmonds Marsh. Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Facility (page 299) The City is also a partner in the Edmonds Crossing multimodal ferry, bus, and rail facility. Sound Transit is planning to relocate Edmonds station as part of the larger Edmonds Crossing Multimodal project being led by WSDOT. While there is no funding for this relocation, the multimodal facility would be an important transit hub for the city. Recommendation 1.P. Remove the Edmonds Crossing subsection under the "transit" heading Acknowledge the existing ferry terminal through the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the other recommendations of Sections 1 and 2. Interjurisdictional Coordination (page 318) Coordinate with WSDOTand the FHWA to move forward with the Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Project. t x Recommendation 1.Q. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference. Coordinate with WSDOT on w r other ferry terminal and traffic improvements per the recommendations of Section 2. E c� a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 11 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 284 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 2 - Ferry Service Key Findings The Edmonds Ferry Terminal is located at the end of Main Street. Vehicle and foot passenger traffic to and from ferries must cross over railroad tracks at the end of the terminal pier. During regular two -boat service, Edmonds/Kingston ferry route has 25 daily round trips running approximately every 45 minutes (depending on time of day). In 2021, the route carried approximately 3.5 million passengers, which included 1.9 million vehicles. This is up from 2020 but still 15% below pre -pandemic volumes. The route has recently operated with only a single vessel due to ongoing pandemic and crew shortage impacts. N Bainbridge Island ;1:0 1 Bremerton Everett • Clinton Mukilteo Kingston 00 Edmonds 5 Seattle SERVICE ENHANCEMENTS Route capacity increase O New vessel Q Additional service hours Increase passenger capacity TERMINAL ENHANCEMENTS Major preservation or improvement Electrification Figure 4 - Summary ofplanned Improvements to the Edmonds/Kingston route (Washington State Ferries) The route currently uses vessels carrying up to 144 or 188 vehicles. Starting in the 2028-2041 timeframe, Washington State Ferries plans to add a third boat to the route for the purpose of increasing service frequency and capacity. All boats on the service would be the 144-vehicle vessels that can be loaded and unloaded more quickly to meet 30-minute headways. One of the two current service vessels, the Puyallup, is planned to be converted to electric -hybrid propulsion and operate all -electric in 2023. Washington State Ferries has not received any data or plans from BNSF on the double -tracking project and therefore has not performed an analysis of how changes in train traffic will affect ferry operations. In one 30-day period in 2015 Washington State Ferries tracked ten ferry delays (ranging from 3 to 15 minutes each) attributed to railroad crossing issues. See Sections 6 and 7 for further information and recommendations on the train crossings. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 12 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 a Packet Pg. 285 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Figure 5 - Main Street where it crosses the railroad and connects to the ferry dock (MAKERS) A reservation system for the Edmonds -Kingston route was studied in 2010, and it was determined that all central Puget Sound ferry routes would need to switch to reservations at the same time for the system to be feasible. The Long Range Plan anticipates a further study of Edmonds terminal improvements and what physical changes would be needed to the vehicle holding lanes. The City of Edmonds 2021-2041 Capital Facilities Plan includes a $357,00 project to "Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users" by 2024. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Economic Development Element PolicyA.8 Leverage business opportunities related to travelers to/from Edmonds using the Washington State Ferry system. Transportation Element Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system thatlinks ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non -motorized travel providing access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. Recommendations See Section 1 on Edmonds Crossing for related recommendations. Recommendation 2.A. Develop new and more specific land use and transportation policies that w recognize the existing ferry terminal and reinforce the City's support for the terminal's current location. Policies should explain the City's stance and strategy around ferry traffic and holding lane E configuration, a potential vehicle reservation system, transit and walking/biking connections to the terminal, and the implications of future three -boat service. a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 13 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 286 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 2.113. Adopt a new transportation policy that calls for a ferry traffic study to assess the impacts of ferry traffic on the Downtown Waterfront. It is currently unclear what, if any, impacts ferry traffic currently has since the SR-104 holding lanes appear to effectively segregate waiting vehicles from the local street network and deboarding traffic occurs for 5-10 minutes during peak times. This study is needed to support the update of the Downtown Waterfront vision (per Recommendations 1.13 and 11.A). When the City conducts the study, it should direct staff to focus on street intersections to determine if ferry traffic has any impacts on transit reliability, private property and business access, and the safety and accessibility of pedestrian and bicycle routes between the waterfront and the core business district. The study should also quantify the current number and duration of train crossing closures at Main Street and Dayton Street, with averages developed over several days/weeks and which also consider the peak freight holiday season (see also Section 7 and Recommendation 7.A). The study should be done in time to support the updated Downtown Waterfront vision (see Recommendation 11.A). If WSF begins planning for a vehicle reservation system or three -boat service during the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, the study could potentially incorporate the considerations of Recommendations 2.0 and 2.D below. Recommendation 2.C. If WSF moves to implement a vehicle reservation system, collaborate on joint transportation planning to balance traffic improvements with the mitigation of potential community impacts, such as pedestrian safety, vehicle idling, air and water pollution, transit reliability, local business impacts, and local street access. Recommendation 2.113. If WSF moves to implement three -boat service on the Edmonds -Kingston route, the City should evaluate the community impacts and opportunities. In particular, collaboration with WSF is needed to determine whether an additional boat slip, employee parking, or other terminal expansion will be built and where the third boat will be moored overnight. The City should also consider if higher service frequency would necessitate or allow changes to the configuration of holding lanes and how this relates to the current holding lane project in the Capital Facilities Plan. a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 14 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 287 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 3 - Unocal Property Key Findings The Unocal Property is a large irregularly shaped parcel (ID 27032600102400) on the south end of the waterfront. The parcel is 21.31 acres in size. In 2005, the State of Washington signed a purchase and sale agreement with Union Oil Company of California (Unocal), a subsidiary of Chevron, to purchase the Unocal Property in anticipation of the Edmonds Crossing project. Figure 6 - View of the Unocal Property (with approximate boundaries in yellow), cleanup operations, Willow Creek, and storm water pond. The Edmonds Marsh is at far left. (MAKERS) The property remains contaminated after the shutdown of a bulk fuel terminal in 1991. The Washington State Department of Ecology has been monitoring the cleanup of the site since that time. Unocal is using a dual phase extraction system, which is a vacuum pumping technology that removes contaminated ground water, petroleum products, and hydrocarbon vapor from the subsurface. According to an email from the Department of Ecology, the extraction system was installed in December 2017. Under an Interim Action Work Plan, the extraction system is expected to run for six E years (until December 2023). At that point, an assessment will determine whether the cleanup goals w have been met. If so, an additional two years of "confirmation monitoring" will occur through the end of 2025 to show long term success. If the cleanup goals are not met, then contingency cleanup actions will be taken with an uncertain schedule. The Department of Ecology will soon publish a draft Cleanup Action Plan with more details on these processes, with the public invited to comment. w r c Per the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the State will be given title to the property once the Department of Ecology has deemed it to be sufficiently cleaned. The City of Edmonds and stakeholders have an interest in the property because it could play a key role in the restoration of f° Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh. a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 15 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 288 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo In 2021 the State Legislature approved a proviso that provides the City of Edmonds the right of first purchase at fair market value to acquire property rights for the site: During the 2027-2023 biennium, if the [state transportation] department takes possession of the property situated in the city of Edmonds for which a purchase agreement was executed between Unocal and the department in 2005 (Tax Parcel Number262703-2-003-0009), and if the department confirms that the property is still no longer needed for transportation purposes, the department shall provide the city of Edmonds with the right of first purchase at fair market value in accordance with RCW 47.12.063(3) for the city's intended use of the property to rehabilitate near -shore habitat for salmon and related species The end of the 2021-2023 biennium is June 30, 2023. Based on the information above provided by the Department of Ecology, this right will expire before a determination can be made on whether cleanup goals have been met at the property. When WSDOT is given title to the property, they will conduct a public process and determine whether the agency has any further need for the property for a transportation purpose. At this time, WSDOT has not identified any such need beyond the agency's original intent to use the property for the now - inactive Edmonds Crossing project. If the property is deemed surplus, WSDOT will be required to receive fair market value for the property either monetarily or through a land exchange. The WSDOT Real Estate Office will work with stakeholders on how that compensation requirement is met. The Unocal Property has a land use designation of Master Planned Development. The site is zoned Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) under a contract rezone signed with Unocal in 2002. The contract rezone is accompanied by a master plan showing two land use alternatives: Alternative One includes the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center and a limited area set aside for mixed -use development; Alternative Two acknowledges the unlikelihood of Edmonds Crossing moving forward, and therefore exclusively includes only mixed -use development. The master plan proposed specific zoning provisions that are still in place under Chapter 16.75 EMC, MP - Master Plan Hillside Mixed -Use Zone, such as permitted uses and dimensional requirements. EMC 16.75.020(D) stipulates that, "(1) No development shall be permitted in an MP1 or MP2 zone unless a master plan has been prepared...", and "(3) All property identified in the master plan shall be developed in a manner consistent with the provisions of the master plan." Therefore, if the Unocal Property retains the MP2 zoning and the property owner desires a different land use type or configuration than that envisioned in the 2002 master plan, a new master plan is required to be approved by the City as a comprehensive plan amendment, a planned residential development, or as a contract rezone. Under the terms of the original contract rezone, the City of Edmonds may initiate a property rezone at any time, or the property owner may amend or terminate the contract using the City's rezoning procedures. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the character and quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies. A.7. Undeveloped public property should be studied to determine its suitability and appropriate areas designed as open space. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 16 Q Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 289 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces: A.2.a Lands which have unique scientific or educational value. A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are linked wildlife corridors or habitats of rare or endangered species. A.2.c Natural and green belt areas adjacent to highways and arterials with the priority to highways classified as scenic. A.2.d Areas which have steep slopes orare in majorstream drainage ways, particularly those areas which have significance to Edmonds residents as watersheds or natural drainage ways. A.2.f Bogs and wetlands. A.2.h Lands which would have unique suitability for future passive or active recreational use. Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply ofprime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the followingpolicies: B.1 Edmonds saltwatershorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. B.2 Wherever possible, provide public access to public bodies of water. Recommendations Recommendation 3.A. The City should retain an outside firm to perform a development feasibility assessment of the Unocal Property to determine its fair market value. The assessment should account for the site's accessibility, presence of critical areas and other ecological features, historic soil and water contamination, proximity to the railroad and other neighboring land uses, and other customary real estate considerations. After completion of the assessment, the City should budget appropriately for the expected fair market value. Recommendation 3.B. The City should exercise its right of first purchase at fair market value on the Unocal Property if it becomes available before June 2023. If this right expires before being exercised, the City should update its 2023 state legislative agenda to include an extension of the right into the 2023-2025 biennium or permanently. This is because the Unocal property cleanup will likely continue past the right's current expiration, and the property's transfer to WSDOT and subsequent availability for purchase has an uncertain schedule. Recommendation 3.C. As part of a cohesive Downtown Waterfront vision and 2024 Comprehensive -0 Plan Update, conduct a public process that determines the community's desired future land use of the w Unocal Property. While there is vocal support for the City to acquire the property for the purpose of ecological restoration and wildlife habitat preservation, and the Legislature's understanding of the City's intended use of the property is to rehabilitate near -shore habitat for salmon and related species, w this has not been affirmed by official City policy. The current Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and site - specific master plan all assume and allow for the now -inactive Edmonds Crossing project and E commercial and mixed -use development. c� a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 17 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 290 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo The public process could take a variety of forms and should be integrated into the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update and aligned with the visioning for the Downtown Waterfront, consistent with Recommendations 1.13 and 11.A. This recommended public process is expected to result in a redesignating and rezoning of the Unocal Property for open space purposes. If this is the case, the following Recommendations 3.D-F also apply Recommendation 3.113. See Recommendation 3.0 above to determine if this recommendation applies. Consider updating the Comprehensive Plan map to redesignate the Unocal Property from Master Planned Development to Open Space. As documented by the key findings, the Edmonds Crossing project as originally envisioned and planned for is no longer active and there are no alternative development proposals by the property owner. Therefore, the Unocal Property's designation for Master Plan Development is outdated and should be updated. The Open Space designation is appropriate if the City's vision for the property is for ecological restoration and wildlife habitat preservation. The City may adopt findings of fact that the designation change meets Open Space goals and policy because the Edmonds Marsh system and associated uplands property: • provides unique scientific and educational value; • has an abundance of wildlife; • is a scenic natural area adjacent to a highway; • provides major drainage way containing salmonid habitat with significance to Edmonds residents; • consists of wetlands and saltwater estuary; and • already includes passive recreation uses. Lastly, update the Comprehensive Plan's description of the Master Plan Development designation (see Recommendation 1.N). Recommendation 3.E. See Recommendation 3.0 above to determine if this recommendation applies. Consider a City -initiated rezoning of the Unocal Property from Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) to Open Space (OS) and prepare a staff report for Planning Board recommendation and City Council approval. The OS zone is appropriate if the City's vision for the property is for ecological restoration and wildlife habitat preservation. The OS zone purpose includes: • "To designate land ... for open space use or which contributes significantly to the open space E inventory of the community"; and w • "To regulate the use of these lands ... which provide an identifiable link to the city's open space or critical areas inventory." x Permitted uses in the OS zone include "conservation areas including forest and wildlife preserves" and w r "reclamation areas limited to soil, forest, wildlife or watershed." E Recommendation 3.F. See Recommendation 3.0 above to determine if this recommendation applies. Prepare an ordinance for the aforementioned Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone to be a adopted simultaneously. This could be integrated into the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update process. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 18 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 291 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 4 - Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek Restoration Key Findings The Edmonds Marsh is one of the few urban, tidally -influenced, saltwater estuaries remaining in the Puget Sound area. The marsh is hydrologically connected to Puget Sound through Willow Creek. Before settlement, the marsh was 40 acres and today it is approximately 22 acres. The marsh is publicly accessible on a half -mile of walkways and boardwalks and is popular with bird watchers due to the variety of observed species. Coho salmon and cutthroat trout have a documented presence, and a volunteer -run fish hatchery is located at the southeast area of the marsh. The marsh is classified as a category II wetland. Figure 7- Left. -Aerial view of Edmonds Marsh and en virons at high tide, looking north. Right- Boardwalk and wildlife viewing areas on the north side of Edmonds Marsh (MAKERS). Willow Creek was diverted into an underground pipe in 1962 during the construction of the Port of Edmonds marina, which has since limited fish access to the marsh. The creek currently empties into Puget Sound under Marina Beach Park. The main action needed to restore the Edmonds Marsh is daylighting Willow Creek and improving fish access forjuvenile Chinook and other fish species to migrate, rear, and forage in the marsh. The 2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan estimated a cost of $12 million for the "Daylighting Willow Creek, salmon habitat and stormwater management project." The 2019 Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling study estimated this a cost of $13.6-16.6 million (this -0 estimate does not include additional work outside the scope of that study). w x w a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 19 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 292 Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo 9.2.a Intersection with Recurrent Flooding DAYTON ST I� J}li SITE Figure 8 - Edmonds Marsh and existing drainage network. The inset photo shows the Willow Creek culvert west of the railroad tracks (Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan). The 2016 Marina Beach Park Master Plan, and subsequent 30% design drawings for the redesigned park, have the creek daylit west of the railroad and emptying into the Puget Sound on the beach. Pedestrian bridges over the creek will discourage human and dog interaction with fish habitat. Reconstruction of the park is estimated to cost $5.6 million. LEg PROPOSEo:LOOD PRaTECTION STRVCTuRE PROPS D OAYLIC+R CONTOUR -j NETLANORESTORATICN RIPARIAN BUFFER SNOHOUL" COLNTY GIS PARCELS Figure 9- Excerpt from October2019 City Council presentation illustrating daylight alignment alternative #6, 'channel with flood wall or berm"(City of Edmonds) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Paae 20 a Packet Pg. 293 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo East of the railroad, the 2019 study determined that a sinuous channel with a low flow habitat channel, large woody debris, and wetland and riparian buffers will provide beneficial habitat for juvenile salmon, meet fish -passage criteria, and provide instream and marsh connectivity habitat functions. This channel was illustrated roughly parallel to the railroad tracks (see Figure 9). Stakeholders have expressed interest in moving the creek further away from the railroad tracks than illustrated in conceptual designs. In August 2020, WSDOT communicated to Save Our Marsh that is has no concerns with routing Willow Creek in a new channel across the middle of the Unocal Property if public process, environmental considerations (particularly with regard to remaining contamination), and appropriate compensation lead to that conclusion. The 2019 study considers this possibility, saying: We understand that the City staffand City Council are interested in expanding the Daylight channel and riparian buffer footprint to the fullest extent possible. In this study, the Daylight Project footprint is constrained by the assumption that WSDOT Ferries will use the site for the future Edmonds Crossing ... lf the WSDOTFerries site constraints are laterremoved, the Daylight Channel alignment can be modified in final design. The one caution with expanding the Daylight Channel is that costs will increase due to increases in excavation, fill, and potential treatment and disposal quantities, as the risks for encountering residual contamination on the site increase with any additional excavation. The 2019 study also found water and sediment quality issues in the marsh and recommends sediment contamination remediation, water quality monitoring, and fecal coliform source studies to restore and improve the marsh health and ecosystem functions. During this project, stakeholders suggested vehicle pollutant runoff from non -point sources across the study area are additional challenges to improving the Edmonds Marsh water quality and creating a safe salmon habitat. The critical area regulations (Chapter 23.50, Edmonds Community Development Code) provide that ecological restoration of the Edmonds Marsh is an eligible location for off -site compensatory mitigation for development projects. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy See other relevant policies under the Unocal Property section above. Community Sustainability Element Environmental Quality Goal A.1 Ensure that the city's natural vegetation, especially native vegetation, associated with its urban forests, wetlands, and other wildlife habitat areas are protected and enhanced for future generations Environmental Quality Goal B.1 The Cityshould promote and increase public awareness and pride in its natural areas and wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving natural areas and habitats (forests, wetlands, streams and beaches), especially those with native vegetation, that support a diversity of wildlife. w Land Use Element Vegetation and Wildlife Goal A. The city should ensure that its woodlands, marshes and other areas E containing natural vegetation are preserved... � c� Q City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 21 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 294 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Vegetation and Wildlife Goal B. The city should promote and increase public awareness and pride in its wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving the natural habitats (woodlands, marshes, streams and beaches) of the city's wildlife in accordance with the following policies: B. l Establish and maintain a variety of educational and recreational programs and activities for all age le vels. B.2 Erect and maintain educational displays that identifysome of the more common plants and animals and their ecosystems and habitats, including at streams, beaches, and marshes. B.3 Prevent the unnecessary disturbance ofnative species and their respective habitats. B.4 Encourage landscaping and site improvement on city -owned property which recognizes value of habitat in overall site design. Community Culture and Urban Design Element Community Culture Goal B. Encourage recreational opportunities. B. l Encourage public access to significant recreational areas and development ofpedestrian friendly connections between areas. B.2 Significant recreational areas would include, but not be limited to: Puget Sound Shorelines, Lake Ballinger, Edmonds Marsh, Yost Park, Lund'5 Gulch, etc. B.3 Compatible land uses should be made ofsurrounding areas. B.4 Promote public awareness and recognition of the value of these resources. Utilities Element Storm and Surface Water Management Goal B. To preserve, protect, and (where feasible) restore surface water resources to provide beneficial uses to humans, fish, and wildlife. 2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Goal 3: Shoreline Use and Access Action plan item 3.F- Develop and implements masterplan to restore the hydrological and ecological connection ofMarina Beach Park to the Edmonds Marsh. Goal4: Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation Action plan item 4.1- Consider expanding the function and facilities around the Willow Creek Hatchery to create a more expansive interpretive center that includes the Edmonds Marsh. Recommendations See related recommendations under Section 3 and Section 5. Recommendation 4.A. Continue planning and funding of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project, including refined cost estimates, engineering, and flood mitigation planning. A x collection of projects related to marsh restoration are listed in the Edmonds 2021-2041 Capital w Facilities Plan. See also the recommendations regarding flooding and sea level rise in Section 5, and as the need to coordinate with a possible Admiral Way overpass under Recommendation TE. E Recommendation 4.13. If Edmonds acquires the Unocal Property (see Section 3), update the design a options for Willow Creek restoration to fully consider the land, optimize ecological outcomes, and City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 22 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 295 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo further improve fish habitat. Key considerations include adjacent land uses and potential pollutants, the width of vegetated riparian zones, avoiding potential fish stranding in connected seasonal inundation areas, avoiding residual contamination from site soils, and minimizing additional cost. Recommendation 4.C. Continue coordinating with property owners and public agencies on pollutant control to minimize untreated runoff into Edmonds Marsh. This may include capital improvements, joint application for grant funding, or enhanced maintenance. For example, the Port of Edmonds manages stormwater quality management with catch basin cleaning and regular power vacuum sweeping of paved areas. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 23 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 296 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 5 - Natural Hazards and Critical Areas Key Findings Figure 10 - National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map sho wing base flood le vel in Edmonds (Federal Em ergen cy Managem en t A gen cy) The Downtown Waterfront is subject to impacts from several types of natural hazards and critical areas. In Edmonds, sea level rise of 4 inches to 4 feet is expected over the next century, and the intensity of storm surges is expected to increase during this time. Nearly the entire Edmonds waterfront is within the 100-year floodplain. Flood maps were updated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in June 2020. Base flood elevation (BFE) is the elevation of surface water resulting from a flood that has a one w percent chance of equaling or exceeding that level in any given year. The BFE on the Edmonds waterfront is 12 feet above sea level. During a major flood event at BFE, the inundation area would include all waterfront properties along w Admiral Way and Railroad Avenue, the ferry terminal, the railroad tracks, Edmonds Station and the transit center, a portion of Edmonds Way/Highway 104, Harbor Square, and part of Salish Crossing. E This indicates that a major flood event could pose a risk to human life, property, and the environment. Major flooding would also disrupt a multimodal transportation hub of regional significance. a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 24 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 297 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo The 2019 Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling study found that without flood mitigation, the Willow Creek daylighting project in combination with extreme king tides, storm surges, and future sea level rise may increase flooding along the railroad, Harbor Square, and State Route 104. Flood protection berms or floodwalls in these locations will be necessary to reduce flood risks compared to existing conditions. The 2019 study included these elements in the cost estimates, and further noted: We estimated costs forAlternative 6A (flood berms $73.6M) and 68 (floodwalls $76.6M). Flood berms may be feasible but may be more difficult to permit as the floodberms will ha ve increased wetland impacts. Depending on wetland permitting regulations, Project funding sources, and BNSF Railway input, there may be Project regulatory and landowner drivers that could dictate which of these structures is feasible and acceptable, regardless of the Project costs. The Port of Edmonds bulkhead project considered sea level rise during project development. The bulkhead is only being raised six inches to accommodate a grade change. Analysis by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Port determined a taller bulkhead was not necessary because the bulkhead does not support any structures, nor would a taller (and therefore more costly) bulkhead prevent flooding beyond its extents. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 25 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 298 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo 1 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Legend — creeks Seismic Hazard Areas r Wetlands ✓` / FT S PHS Public Points — PHS Public Lines �N J _ Q iO 3E PHS Public Polygon Outlines ASMAPPED etl PHS Public Polygons t,yi ASMAPPED LA IY W 1Y sEcnoN 9M 1'f1 u ITI r TOWNSHIP TCINS I Landslide Hazard Area 40% L I ; �' O Severe Erosion Hazard 154G4011 ❑ Erosion Hazard Areas 15%.40% SH7-1 — _ _ _ _ — _ _ � - Sections Boundary Sections Edmond s Boun dary Ar6DE, 0S.STREET_CENTERUN E'. all oInervaluee� _ 12 I =EEEEEEE75125 T y Interstate Pnndpal nnerlal J D ^ PI R3 ST � M FT Mlnor A, Colletlor Herlal' Local Sheet, On Ramp e- •j 1: 12,125 U Notes 0 1,0t038 2,020.8 Fee[ 1,504.7 Thls ma 18,056 P�sa�sergenerae t tlstatic out tfmm an lntern1, a t d,,for P� PP�nEs�ean reference only. Data layerstnat appear on ml � map may or may ao< he acaaee, W65 1984 Web Mercator_Au hi ny_Sphere rent, or oth—se yell Inc S) 0nr of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTMUCTI ON Figure I I -Critical areas map generated ,by the City of Edmonds online Geographic Information System. The purple shading represents sensitive species habitat areas. A large portion of the planning area is within a seismic hazard zone, meaning that soil may liquefy and cause additional damage to buildings and infrastructure in the event of an earthquake. In the Puget Sound area, this type of risk is typically found in waterfront areas of fill where land has been artificially expanded. Data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources further subdassifies the liquefaction hazard area shown on Figure 11, with the area west of the railroad having a high -risk susceptibility the area around the Edmonds Marsh and Harbor Square having a moderate -to -high susceptibility. The slope between the Edmonds Marsh/Unocal Property and the Point Edwards development is -0 w mapped as an erosion hazard. Much of the offshore marine waters and the Edmonds Marsh system are mapped as sensitive species habitat area. x w r As noted in Section 4, the Edmonds Marsh is classified as a category II estuarine and coastal lagoon wetland. The critical area regulations (Chapter 23.50, Edmonds Community Development Code) E provide that ecological restoration of the Edmonds Marsh is an eligible location for off -site compensatory mitigation for development projects. Information on the relationship between the a marsh and land use is in Section 11. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 26 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 299 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Relevant Comprehensive Plan and Hazard Mitigation Plan Policy Community Sustainability Element Climate Change Goal C. Assess the risks and potentia/impacts on both citygovernment operations and on the larger Edmonds community due to climate change. The assessment ofrisk and potential responses - both in terms of mitigation and adaptation -should evaluate the full range of issues, paying particular attention to those arising from the city's location on Puget Sound. Implementation Action: By2077, update the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan to reference emerging risks and hazards related to climate change, such as rising sea levels and ocean acidification. Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan, City of Edmonds Annex Table 6-7 Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix. ED-23. Sea level rise mitigation planning, including assessment of riskandstrategiestoaddress. Leaddepartment.•DevelopmentServices, Public Works, Parks and Recreation. CostLow. Timeline: Short term. Recommendations Recommendation S.A. Update the Comprehensive Plan with more specific policies that address the 0 E City's preparation for and response to future major flooding events and long-term sea level rise in the Downtown Waterfront area. Utilize the latest information on flood levels and sea level rise projections. Sea level rise should be factored into the updated Downtown Waterfront vision (see Recommendation o c m Recommendation S.B. Using the latest sea level rise projections and FEMA flood data, update the E assessment of the physical, economic, and social impacts of long-term sea level rise in the Downtown 0 Waterfront area and the necessary actions or projects to protect lives, public infrastructure, and private property. This may support an update to the 2015 Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan and City of Edmonds Annex. Communicate findings on sea level rise to the Edmonds community. y a Recommendation S.C. Continue planning for flood mitigation as an essential component of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project (see also Recommendation 4.A.). This includes U. refined cost estimating and determining the preferred location for flood berms and/or floodwalls that m most effectively protect lives and property. The construction and operation of flood berms and Y r floodwalls should seek to minimize environmental disturbances and takings of private property. o Coordinate with BNSF Railway, the Port of Edmonds, and WSDOT on planning, design, and potential cost sharing. Additionally, adequate sizing of the stream crossing near the Puget Sound shoreline would improve hydrologic connections to the marsh and the flood water storage functions it naturally provides. Given E the modeled increases in flood event frequency and magnitude, site improvements in floodplains -0 w should be scaled accordingly. x w a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 27 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 300 Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo 9.2.a Section 6 - Railroad Double -Tracking Key Findings BNSF Railway owns and operates railroad tracks along the eastern shoreline of Puget Sound, and a single-track segment runs through the Edmonds waterfront. Spurred by the business and operations efficiency needs of freight service and the reliability of passenger service (operated by Sound Transit and Amtrak), BNSF plans to add a second track to this segment. The project is anticipated to begin construction in 2024. According to Sound Transit, a second passenger platform on the west side of Edmonds Station is not planned since passenger service is infrequent and unidirectional. The project will fill the 2-mile gap between other double -track segments roughly between Edmonds Street in the north to Point Wells in the south. The second track will be located 15 feet east of the current track within BNSF right-of-way. Some site work has already occurred to prepare for the project, including embankment work on the west edge of the Edmonds Marsh and stockpiling of ties. BNSF Railway owns the land at the two railroad street crossings in the waterfront area, located at Main Street and Dayton Street, and the City possesses easements for the street crossings. Legal research on case law and property documents determined there is no evidence that the City of Edmonds has acquired fee simple title to the underlying property. BNSF has not shared any project plans with the City. MAKERS conducted a preliminary analysis of physical impacts based on the minimum track clearances for railroads being 8 feet horizontal and 23.5 feet vertical. The analysis shows Railroad Avenue should not be affected by the project. At Edmonds Station the existing ADA wheelchair ramp (mini -high platform) will be removed and the passenger platform and stationhouse at Edmonds Station are likely to remain in place. /Y Figure 12 - Visualization ofsecond railroad track (MAKERS) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 i s Visualization of Second Railroad Track at the Edmonds Waterfront Legend E Approximate center of existing track - Estimated center of second track Estimated horizontal clear zone of second track Paae 28 Q Packet Pg. 301 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo BNSF is not planning any major mitigation work associated with the project. Sound Transit plans to rebuild the wheelchair ramp and make refinements to the existing platform edge, and the agency believes BNSF may provide track protection/flagging during these platform improvements. Figure 13 - Left.• View looking north at Edmonds Station. The second track will remove most of the asphalt paving and require replacing the wheelchairramp in the distance. Right.• This walkwaybetween the station and Main Street would also be remo ved by the second track construction. (MAKERS) Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Noise Pollution Goal A. A.3 It is the policy of the city to minimize noise created by the railroad. Recommendations See related recommendations under Sections 7 and 8. Recommendation 6.A. Create additional Comprehensive Plan policies in the Transportation Element that support mitigation of railroad traffic and crossing closures. Recommendation 6.113. Apply to the Federal Railroad Administration to establish a full quiet zone. Wayside horns are currently in place which still have sound impacts on surrounding land uses. A full M quiet zone greatly reduces train horns sound impacts in exchange for upgrading the safety of at -grade crossings with additional gates, signals, and other measures. Local jurisdictions usually need to c provide funding for the safety upgrades. Applying for a quiet zone requires the assistance of a E specialized consultant. w Recommendation 6.C. Coordinate with Sound Transit and BNSF to minimize construction impacts from the second track project and to expediate improvements to Edmonds Station that maintain x passenger accessibility and capacity. w r c as E c� a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 29 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 302 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 7 - Waterfront Emergency Access Key Findings The waterfront and marina area west of the railroad have special emergency access considerations because the train tracks isolate it from the rest of Edmonds. On several occasions, train traffic has delayed ambulances or required first responders to cross through stopped trains on foot to treat/evacuate individuals needing care. In the period July 2010 to December 2015, emergency calls to locations west of the railroad track numbered 277 (including 72 advanced life support calls, 14 fires, and eight water rescues). This is an average of one call per week. Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 also receives 40-50 calls per year that requires accessing their emergency boat that is moored at the Edmonds Marina. Figure 14 - A freight train passing through the Dayton Street crossing (photo ,by Bill Anderson) Observed and projected train volumes vary widely (see Figure 15). Currently, approximately 40 trains of all kind pass travel through Edmonds daily. Various studies and plans estimate up to 80 trains per day in the future, with freight volumes being highly dependent on economic trends. A related factor is the average length of freight trains, which has been steadily increasing over time nationwide. The number and length of trains has implications for "gate down" time at the Dayton Street and Main E Street crossings, which currently average about two minutes per train. In one 30-day period in 2015, w Washington State Ferries tracked ten ferry delays ranging from three to 15 minutes, each attributed to railroad crossing issues. x w a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 30 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 303 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Year Average Daily Trains Sources/Notes Observations 2008 48 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009) 2012 37 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, page 18, citing 2012 City of Edmonds video recordings Note: This study found average gate down times of 1.33 hours daily and 2.16 minutes per train. 2012 40 Edmonds Resolution No. 1280 (2012) 2014 36-43 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, pages 1 and 18 Projections/Forecasts 2028 80 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009) 2035 82 PSRC Economic Evaluation of Regional Impacts for the Proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point (2014) Note: This projection includes 18 trains associated with the cancelled Gateway Pacific Terminal project. 2035 64 Washington State Rail Plan (2014) 2040 44-76 Washington State Rail Plan (2020), range of low/moderate/high growth scenarios Figure 75 - Observed and projected train volumes in Edmonds The 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study presented a near -term recommendation to implement an Edmonds Street Emergency Access Overpass, which was further studied in the January 2019 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Alternatives Analysis Report. The concept was a pedestrian -bike bridge that could also be used for emergency vehicle access and ferry loading during train blockages. The Connector project was in early design when, in June 2019, the Edmonds City Council voted to cancel the project due to public opposition to potential impacts to the waterfront's natural features. Reliable emergency access for the waterfront west of the railroad tracks remains unresolved. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Transportation Element Policy 5.6 Design streets to accommodate emergencyservice vehicles. Improve emergency service access to the waterfront, especially to west side of train tracks when there is a train crossing. Recommendations See related recommendations under Section 6. Recommendation 7.A. For planning purposes, assume 60-80 trains per day will pass through Edmonds by the end of the 2024-2044 planning period. To better understand current train traffic, w perform the ferry traffic study described by Recommendation 2.13. Recommendation 7.113. Update the Comprehensive Plan transportation policy 5.6 to clarify that emergency service access to the waterfront includes considerations for both vehicular and non- w vehicular access. c as Recommendation 7.C. Street closures due to train crossings are a continued problem, and emergency service in the waterfront area west of the railroad tracks remains at risk of disruption. Consider updating the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Community Sustainability Element, a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 31 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 304 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo and Capital Facilities Plan with policies to support enhanced emergency management services in this area. Emergency considerations include fire and medical response, police response, boating and marine incidents, and natural disaster response (such as flooding). Further, the City should take such actions to implement the policies. Emergency management planning and investments must be conducted collaboratively with organizations such as the Port of Edmonds, BNSF Railway, Washington State Ferries, Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. Opportunities for capital facilities studies west of the tracks include a new staffed fire station or ambulance/paramedic facility, a staffed police kiosk or mini -precinct, and/or unstaffed storage of emergency response vehicles/equipment (which was considered in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study). Transportation options that should be studied include a new pedestrian -only overpass (see Recommendation 7.D) and/or a new vehicular emergency vehicle roadway (see Recommendation 7.E). Recommendation 7.1113. Update the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element and Capital Facilities Plan with policies to support planning, design, and funding of a pedestrian -only overpass across the railroad tracks. Further, the City should take such actions to implement the project. This is consistent with the "near -term" recommendation from the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study for a midblock pedestrian overpass, estimated to cost $6-8 million (not adjusted for inflation). To minimize costs and aesthetic impacts, the City should plan for the overpass to have a compact footprint with switchback stairs and elevators (no ramps or escalators) and clearances no greater than required by the railroad. There are several opportunities to site the overpass on public property, illustrated conceptually in Figure 16. Planning considerations include span length and subsequent cost, pedestrian safety, ease of use, staging areas for emergency responders, and changes to circulation systems (parking, transit center, sidewalks, etc.) depending on where structures are placed. Coordination with BNSF Railway will be needed to maintain railroad track clearances and manage construction. The project also will require agreements with any affected property owners. Figure 76 - Conceptual midblock pedestrian o verpass locations illustrated in orange, generally on public property, between Dayton Street and Main Street (MAKERS) Q City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 32 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 305 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo ter' Figure 77 - Concept for a midblock pedestrian overpass at Edmonds Station (2076 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study) Recommendation 7.E. If vehicular emergency access remains desirable by the City and emergency response agencies, update the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element and Capital Facilities Plan to support planning, design, and funding of an emergency vehicle roadway and overpass at the south end of the waterfront. Further, the City should take such actions to implement the project if it acquires the Unocal Property (see Section 3 for related recommendation). An "Admiral Way Overpass" was evaluated in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, receiving positive public feedback and scoring high for human and natural environment criteria, and was screened out after a second level evaluation. The estimated cost is $10 million for the overpass and $25-31 million for the full project (not adjusted for inflation). Cost assumptions could likely be updated around land acquisition needs, new parking, and hazardous material removal. The concept should be revisited because the route could utilize an existing roadway on the Unocal site, and it would not have the aesthetic or environmental concerns that were raised with the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector. By hugging the base of the hillside below Point Edwards, the route is mostly out of public view, does not occupy a beach shoreline, and it would not be designed for ferry traffic. The route could be open for non -motorized use during non -emergency times, which would enhance pedestrian and bicycle access between the waterfront and residential areas south of Downtown. The design may need to be coordinated with the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration (see Recommendations 4.A and 4.13). Close coordination with the Port of Edmonds will be necessary to minimize impacts to parking and marina operations. Coordination with BNSF Railway will be needed to maintain railroad track clearances, resolve any property issues, and manage construction. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 33 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 306 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Figure 78 - Conceptual route fora vehicular emergency access connection (MAKERS) r a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 34 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 307 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 8 - Edmonds Station Access Projects and Sound Transit Service Key Findings During regular service, the Sounder North commuter rail line operates eight daily trips from Everett to Seattle with an intermediate stop in Edmonds. Pre -pandemic, the route carried about 1,500 passengers daily. Service has been reduced to four daily trips during the pandemic. Inset Map � sq 5r� v \�o f Q' i OU y Edmonds 4 Station n �d ^' R'esst W Dayton St 13 13 Dayton St Edmonds Station improvements recommended for further study 1. Washington State Ferries parking lot 2. Salish Crossing parking lot 4. Downtown pedestrian lighting improvements 8. Additional bus bays at Edmonds Station 10. Additional on -demand bicycle lockers 11. Wind and rain screening at Edmonds Station 12. Bus transfer timing improvements (not mapped) Figure 79 - Excerpt ofplanned access projects at Edmonds Station (Sound Transit, MAKERS) Sound Transit proposed several Edmonds Station access and mobility improvements in the Sound Transit 3 funding package, which voters approved in 2016. The value of the improvements is estimated at $25 million and includes parking improvements, pedestrian lighting, additional bus bays, bike lockers, and additional weather protection on the station platform. One of the parking improvement projects under consideration is reconfiguring or repainting the WSDOT parking lot on James Street so that it fits more parking spaces. Due to financial challenges, Sound Transit's mobility/access projects around Edmonds Station are delayed by about ten years, with completion expected in 2034 instead of 2024. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Downtown/WaterfrontArea Short Term Actions 3. Improve the existing downtown rail station .between Dayton and Main Streets in order to better accommodate inter -city passengerand commuter rail service, including provisions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and downtown... Transportation Element Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non -motorized travel providing access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. Recommendations Recommendation 8.A. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element, acknowledge the Edmonds Station access improvements that are planned by Sound Transit and support their implementation as soon as possible. See related Recommendation 6.C. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 35 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 308 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 9 - Bus Service Key Findings Community Transit operates four bus routes that stop at Edmonds Station. Three of the routes are local and one is an express service to Downtown Seattle. The agency is currently updating its Long Range Plan and network vision, with adoption targeted for late 2022. By 2024, the agency is planning a major service restructure in the area to leverage the new light rail stations opening at the nearby Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace transit centers. As part of the restructure, local bus service in Downtown Edmonds will increase 30-50% with most lines running every 15 minutes. Additional layover space is necessary to accommodate increased bus service but has not yet been located or designed (Sound Transit proposes new bus bays by the year 2034, see Section 8). Adjacent properties would be most desirable for this purpose and buses cannot be routed across the railroad tracks. The current local routes 116 and 130 connect people in Downtown Edmonds to the transit centers in Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace. City of Edmonds staff report community interest in improved bus service/speed for these connections. In 2022 Community Transit began construction on a bus rapid transit (BRT) route, known as the Swift Orange Line, running between Edmonds College to Lynnwood, Ash Way, and Mill Creek. The route will open by mid-2024 and connect to the Lynnwood light rail station. Community Transit anticipates a future extension of the Orange Line westward to the vicinity of Downtown Edmonds, possibly using 196th Street. Currently, the extension is conceptual and unfunded, and it requires a BRT-compliant terminal facility. Also, Community Transit's draft 2050 Long Range Plan includes a "transit emphasis corridor" along SR-104 between Downtown Edmonds and the Mountlake Terrace light rail station, with potential 15-minute service all day on weekdays. Legend Local Community Transit Routes Express Community Transit Routes Funded Swft Orange Line BRT pening 2024) uuuuuuu Cooncepttual extenson of Swift Orange Line BRT (unofficial) uuumuuu Conceptual bus transit emphasis corridor 0 downtown Edmonds 1101I Sound Transit light rail route �/ and stations (opening 2024) Ldmends Station; QQ Ldmonds College Ferry Terminal Transit Center a 116 130 196 115 11b IN aspersst Edmonds Park&Ride bc, ` Main St t- O�' on Boyaor7YVj _ y =DMONDS ova°5c ''~ _ 220th St ''*_h/IIIllo."NAIIIIfill] llllllBIIII IIIII IIIIIIIV, a fill a' , Is •�r�2oath55 Lynnwood Transit Center 196 201 2 2 402 4261 1, z 810 821 855 511 512 535 © Mountlake Terrace High Schorr. z MOUNTLA z�SthstTERRACE 236th St A mum CS ;0 Mountlake Terrace Transit Center SNOHOn4. Aurora Village J 11' 119 130 410 KING O Transit Center c 35 810 871 Swift Blue Line �N `corn St 101 115 130 511 512 513 Uig County Metro Q King County Metro Figure 20 -Edmonds transit map (Community Transit, MAKERS) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 36 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Q Packet Pg. 309 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Figure 21- Edmonds Station bus transit center (MAKERS) Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal B. Continue to plan for and implement improvements in the downtown/waterfront area that resolve safety conflicts while encouraging multi -modal transportation and access to the waterfront. B.3 Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring improved bus service, pedestrian and bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas. Transportation Element Policy 5.77 Encourage the provision of bus rapid transit system or other high -capacity frequent transit service along SR 704, Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non -motorized travel providing access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity oflocal commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. Recommendations Recommendation 9.A. Continue discussions with Community Transit and Sound Transit about the location and design of the additional bus bays that are planned at Edmonds Station. Consider a new policy in the Transportation Element that promotes that these new bus bays include a BRT-compliant terminal facility to facilitate future delivery of the Orange Line (e.g., see the transit design guidelines from the National Association of City Transportation Officials). Recommendation 9.13. Consider a new policy in the Transportation Element that promotes City actions to accelerate the delivery of the Swift Orange Line extension to Downtown Edmonds and/or frequent service to the Mountlake Terrace light rail station. The policy should support discussions with W WSDOT about options for future bus service enhancements along SR-104 and SR-524. Avenues of City r_ support could include, but are not limited to, City funding for planning and construction, joint grant E applications, expedited right-of-way permitting/easements (e.g., for stations), transit spot improvements (e.g., bus lanes and signal priority), and proactive community discussions of preferred a alignments. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 37 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 310 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 9.C. Continue coordinating with Community Transit generally on bus service revisions and transit facility planning to maximize multimodal connectivity, transit ridership, and pedestrian safety. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 38 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 311 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 10 - Port of Edmonds Key Findings The Port of Edmonds owns and manages approximately 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats. A variety of services and marine -related businesses are located on the Port's properties. The Port is rebuilding part of the bulkhead at the marina, a project valued at $15-20 million. The project includes an improved walkway on the bulkhead and two new plazas, public restrooms, and landscaping. The bulkhead reconstruction is in the design phase with earliest estimated completion in 2025, depending on timing of permits. The Port's new administration building is in the permitting phase and estimated to be completed by 2024. After this current series of work, the Port of Edmonds does not have plans for major infrastructure or development work. Figure 22 - Port of Edmonosproject sites (MAKERS) The Port recently considered building a parking structure at the corner of Admiral Way and Dayton Street. The current surface parking lot there has approximately 100 spaces for a mix of commuters and Port tenants. Due to the site's zoning (Commercial Waterfront with a 30 feet height limit), a parking structure could not be built large enough on the site to create a worthwhile increase in the current number of spaces, so the Port is not proceeding with the concept. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Downtown/Waterfront Area Long Term Actions. 3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development. Economic Development Element Economic Development Goal A.7 Continue to partner with business leaders, organizations and community members, such as the Port ofEdmonds, Edmonds Chamber ofCommerce, etc., to leverage business opportunities and to solicit and address feedback to enhance the business environment. Recommendations Recommendation 10.A. As they arise, continue coordinating infrastructure and development planning efforts with the Port of Edmonds. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 39 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 a Packet Pg. 312 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 11 - Land Use and Economic Development Key Findings Land use and economic development considerations in the waterfront study area include several large properties. One such property is Harbor Square, a commercial site owned by the Port of Edmonds. The site is under a contract rezone dating from 1980 and updated in 1998. The site has several 1-2 story buildings containing a mix of commercial uses, including a hotel, athletic club, retail shops, medical clinics, professional offices, and associated parking lots. In 2012 the Port of Edmonds applied for an amendment to the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan to adopt a Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan with a vision for mixed -use development. The redevelopment plan intended to further the Port's statutory directive of "engaging in economic development programs" to benefit constituents of the Port District as well as the overall Edmonds community with an expanded tax base, increased downtown activity, and promotion of transit -oriented development. - U LEGEND Eli whicleac ,"d parking �� P ae+ nolenleE sbl90onM and O yillape plaza ReaidenLal Tillage ....... Primaryapetleslaae d, ❑ MiKad use Q D Figure 23 - Left: Concept for the 2012 Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan (Port of Edmonds). Right.• A building at Harbor Square (MAKERS). A specific architectural design was not part of the Harbor Square amendment. The Edmonds Planning Board approved the Port's amendment with conditions, and the Edmonds City Council rejected the application due to public opposition to potentially taller buildings on the site and a desire to do a comprehensive review of the entire waterfront area. Today the Port considers Harbor Square to be economically stable and there are no other plans for major improvements or redevelopment. Another major property is the Salish Crossing commercial center. The center is fully leased, and the owner has no plans for major improvements or redevelopment. The non-profit Cascadia Art Museum, located at Salish Crossing, draws approximately 13,000 visitors per year. Harbor Square and Salish Crossing are located between SR-104 and the railroad tracks, which is the area subject to Land Use Element short term action #4 that calls for a joint public/private development and activities such as infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, and City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 40 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 a Packet Pg. 313 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). The Edmonds Waterfront Center, a two-story community facility owned by the non-profit Edmonds Senior Center, opened in July 2021. Along with hosting social, health, and recreation programs and a coffee shop, the venue is available to the public for events. The project also rebuilt a portion of the waterfront walkway. Figure 24 - Left: The Ebb Tide Condominiums (gray. building) and the new Edmonds Waterfront Center. Right The Salish Crossing property and Edmonds Station (at far right). Images by MAKERS. There is an approximately 300-feet long gap in the recreational waterfront walkway that runs between Main Street and Dayton Street. The completion of this "missing link" has been delayed by litigation since at least 2017. The litigation is a result of disagreement between the Ebb Condominium homeowner association and the City of Edmonds about the use of an easement. Following a recommendation by City staff and the Citizens Economic Development Commission, in February 2021 the City Council amended the CW zone to allow hotels. The most likely prospect for a hotel in the study area is limited to adaptive reuse due to limited land availability and the CW zone height limit. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Edmonds Crossing Short Term Actions (page 53) 4. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area between SR-104 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives andguidelinesor modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or masterplanning)... Downtown/Waterfront Districts. In addition to the goals and policies for the downtown/waterfront area, the Comprehensive Plan Map depicts a number of districts in the downtown/waterfront area. These districts are described below. x w Downtown Mixed Commercial. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floorspacesshould be designed r with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range ofretail and commercial uses., with commercial 0) entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal ofachieving pedestrian scale development. The first floor of buildings must provide pedestrian M weatherprotection along publicsidewalks. Design guidelines should provide forpedestrian-scale design Q features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 41 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 314 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo interior commercial spaces must allo w for flexible commercial space, so that individual ,business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear of property adjoins a residentially -designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Where single family homes still exist in this area, development regulations should allow for "live-work"arrangements where the house can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required (i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between). Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian -friendly streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels. Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required (i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between). Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian -friendly streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels. Downtown Master Plan. The properties between SR-704 and the railroad, including Harbor Square, the Edmonds Shopping Center (former Safeway site), and extending past the Commuter Rail parking area up to Main Street. This area is appropriate for design -driven master planned development which provides for a mix of uses and takes advantage ofits strategic location between the waterfront and downtown. Any rede velopment in this area should be oriented to the street fronts, and pro vide pedestrian -friendly walking areas, especially along Dayton and Main Streets. Development design should also not ignore the railroad side of the properties, since this is an area that provides a "first impression'of the city from railroad passengers and visitors to the waterfront. Artwork, landscaping, and modulated building design should be used throughout any redevelopmentproject. Shoreline Commercial. The waterfront, west of the railroad tracks between the public beaches and the Port (currentlyzoned CW). Consistent with the City' Shoreline Master Program, this area should allow a mix of public uses, supporting commercial uses, and water -oriented and water -dependent uses. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development while providing incentives to encourage public view corridors. Roof and building forms should be an important consideration in design guidelines for this area, because of its high sensitivityand proximity to public open spaces. Redevelopment should result in singular, landmark buildings of high quality and sustainable design which take advantage of the visibility and natural en vironment of their location, and which contribute to the unique character of the waterfront. Pedestrian amenities and weatherprotection must be provided for buildings located along public walkways and street fronts. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal A. A.4 Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities. E Improve public access to the shoreline and link waterfront features by establishing a continuous esplanade w along the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and Shoreline Master Program requirements placed on private development. Downtown/Waterfront Area Short Term Actions 7. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline x walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Bracketts Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of w r Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina functions into the long term plan. E Economic Development Element Economic Development Goal B. Revitalize and enhance the city's business districts, balancing the needs for a housing, commerce and employment development with neighborhood character, amenities and scale. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 42 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 315 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo B.4. Continue to foster and enhance the economic vitality of Downtown Edmonds, including retention andgrowth of existing businesses, attraction of new,businesses, and promotion ofappropriate in -fill redevelopment., B.6. Promote enhanced connectivity between the Edmonds Center of the Arts and the Downtown business community to maximize synergyand economic impacts. Economic Development Goal E. Expand and enhance the tourism sector to attract outside spending to help fuel the local economy. E.7. Support efforts to enhance the hospitality infrastructure, including potential for an increased numberand/or widerrange of lodging establishments Downtown... Community Culture and Urban Design Element Urban Design Goal B: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. Design objectives and standards should be carefully crafted for the Downtown/WaterfrontActivity Center to encourage its unique design characterand important place -making status within the city. B.9 Building Height. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown buildings. Building frontages along downtown streetscapes should be pedestrian in scale. Zoning Standards The table below summarizes key zones in the waterfront area. As noted in the recommendations below, the consultant team finds that the building height limits in most zones and the prohibition on residential use in the CW zone are a constraint to economic development on the Edmonds waterfront. Permitted Examples of Major Zones in the Residential Permitted Non - Waterfront Study Area Height Limit Density Limit Uses Residential Uses Commercial Waterfront 30 feet None None Marine -oriented (CW) service, retail, office, hotels General Commercial (CG) 35 feet None None Most non-residential with Harbor Square contract uses rezone ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Other Harbor Square contract rezone requirements include minimum 25 feet setbacks from streets and the marsh, required screening of service and storage areas, and requiring all development to receive Architectural Design Board approval. Community Business (BC) 25-30 feet* 3.0 FAR max. Single-family Retail, restaurants, and multifamily offices, services Downtown Mixed 30 feet None Single-family Retail, office, service, Commercial (BD2) and upper -story hotels multifamily Downtown Mixed 30 feet None Residential (BD4) Multi Family (RM-1.5) 25 feet 1,500 sq. ft. lot Single-family None area per unit and multifamily min. Multi Family (RM-2.4) 25-30 feet* 2,400 sq. ft. lot area per unit min. * Maximum height depends on roof design, see Title 16 EMC for details. Figure 25 - Summary of waterfront area zoning standards City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 43 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Q Packet Pg. 316 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo _ Historic Sites Sites on Edmonds Register of Historic Places Rezanes Contract Rezones (contractual requirements apply) Single Family RS-6 Single Family, 6,000aq. ft. fats Multi Family RPh-3 Multi Family, 3,(?m sq. ft. of lot area per unit RM-2.4 Multi Family, 2,400 sq. ft. cf lot area per unit - RM-1.5 Multi Family, 1,500 sq. ft. of lat areo per unit Downtown Business BD1 Downtown Retail Core BD2 Downtown Mixed Commercial BD3 Downtown Convenience Commercal BD4 Downtown Mixed Resideatiat BD5 Downtown Arts Corridor OR Office-Residenfral Commercial - BC Community Business CG General Commercaf Waterfront - CW Commercrai Waterfront ® MP1 Master Pico Hiilside Mixed Use MP2 Master Plan Hil(ssde Mixed Use Other = P Public Use �'ej OS Open space 500 300 0 600 1,200 Fcet N Figure 26 - Excerpt of Edmonds zoning map in the waterfront area (City of Edmonds) H Shoreline Management Standards The Edmonds Shoreline Master Program (SMP) provides standards for development and environmental protection along the shorelines of Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. The shoreline jurisdiction generally extends 200 feet landward. Figure 27 shows shoreline designations. Figure 27- South Edmonds Shoreline Master Program designations (City of Edmonds) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 44 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 a Packet Pg. 317 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo In general, the shoreline designations impose stricter limitations on permitted uses than what is allowed by the underlying zoning. Some land uses have minimum shore setbacks that may exceed other setback requirements, such as minimum 50-60 feet shore setbacks for parking areas in some designations. The building height limits follow the standards of the underlying zoning. Notably, for the Edmonds Marsh, in the Urban Mixed Use IV designation the standards require a minimum 110-foot buffer and an additional 15-foot building setback beyond (Edmonds Community Development Code section 24.40.090). The buffer must be vegetated and maintained to protect ecological functions. The width of the required buffer impacts the future economic development potential of the Port of Edmonds' Harbor Square property. The code's footnote 18 allows for an alternative buffer width through a shoreline conditional use permit "if a site -specific scientific study determines that the default buffer is not necessary to protect and maintain the baseline functions of this wetland/tideland habitat and its other associated ecological functions from being adversely impacted by the proposed project." Recommendations The consultant team observes that the Edmonds Waterfront and Downtown are special places in Puget Sound. To be sure, there are other waterfront towns, but Edmonds stands out with its historic character, human -scaled development pattern, and walkable waterfront. These attributes appear to drive Edmonds' economic health (and economic development) in as much as people want to live, work, and visit in such a community. Recommendation 11.A. As part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, conduct public engagement for the purpose of crafting an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront area. The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires for the type and intensity of desired land uses for key properties within the framework of current market realities (building height is a significant controversy in the area, but the community's vision for the level of density and vibrancy on the Downtown Waterfront is unclear). Since Edmonds Crossing is inactive, the updated vision should also reorient the community's desires for how the existing ferry terminal is integrated into the Downtown Waterfront. Similarly, the updated vision should explain how the Port of Edmonds, the waterfront parks, the Unocal Property, Edmonds Station, and other major waterfront properties and amenities are best related and planned for in the future. Sea level rise should also be considered. This should include an update to the Downtown Master Plan land use designation and description that currently applies to Harbor Square, Salish Crossing, and the rail/bus transit center (see page 56 of the Comprehensive Plan). See related Recommendations 1.13, 3.C, 5.A, and 1 I.E. Recommendation 11.113. Based on land use patterns on other Pacific Northwest waterfronts, it is reasonable to believe that there may be demand for new hotel rooms on the Edmonds waterfront. Given the unique potential of a beachfront hotel, the City should adopt Comprehensive Plan policies x that support working to attract a hotel operator and associated uses (restaurant, water -related, and/or W other commercial). Hotels can anchor waterfront destinations and their customers typically have higher spending power than local permanent residents of an area, which will help support nearby E commercial space in the area. The City should explore a range of strategies to attract a hotel, including first conducting a hotel feasibility study, developing a targeted incentives package, and identifying a and potentially acquiring an appropriate site, among others. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 45 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 318 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 11.C. Consider adopting Comprehensive Plan policies, zoning updates, and shoreline management updates that facilitate allowing a wider mix of land uses of all types in the Commercial Waterfront (CW) zone. As demand for many office and retail uses ebbs (due to work -from home and online shopping trends), greater flexibility is needed for properties to find economically stable and viable uses that will in turn support employment and commercial activity in the waterfront and wider Downtown area. Recommendation 11.113. The height limitations in the waterfront area (generally three -stories) are likely to lock most buildings in place as they are today for the coming decades. Given that most development is likely to take place via adaptive reuse, the City should consider adopting Comprehensive Plan policies that support an adaptive reuse incentive program, which can provide technical or financial assistance to property owners for design and engineering assessments; facade, systems or interior improvements; seismic retrofits; or other building improvements. Good local examples are in Vancouver and Tacoma. Recommendation 11.E. Where new development or adaptive reuse projects are proposed adjacent to the railroad, encourage buildings to incorporate soundproofing that mitigates the impacts of railroad traffic. This could occur through updates to zoning standards, the locally adopted building code, or education of permitting staff and applicants. Design standards should require that railroad - facing frontages avoid blank walls, however, and should incorporate artwork, landscaping, and modulated building design to provide a welcoming gateway to railroad passengers and visitors. Recommendation 11.F. The height limitations in the waterfront area (generally three -stories) are likely to lock most buildings in place as they are today for the coming decades. If the City is interested in encouraging redevelopment or infill development of surface parking lots, consider adopting Comprehensive Plan policies that support exploration of the tradeoffs of modest and strategic height or density bonuses in exchange for desired land uses and public benefits/amenities, and which consider view corridors. Recommendation 11.G. Continue the legal efforts to finish the waterfront walkway. Recommendation 11.H. Conduct a comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront area between SR-104 and the shoreline to understand current utilization, find opportunities for consolidated parking and shared parking, and analyze possible changes to parking regulations for off- street and on -street parking. The study should consider differences between residential and non- residential uses and the effects of priced parking. The study should include a comparison of the amount of surface parking between Edmonds and similar downtown waterfronts such as, but not limited to, Anacortes, Port Angeles, Bremerton, Port Townsend, and Kirkland. Recommendation 11.1. Consider changing the Marina Beach Park land use designation from Master Planned Development to Open Space and rezoning it from Commercial Waterfront to Public Use. This -2 would more accurately accommodate the use and purpose of the park as a public recreation site. The x w redesignation and rezoning could potentially occur alongside similar actions for the Unocal Property r c (see the recommendations in Section 3). E c� a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 46 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 319 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 12 - Sources Documents > Document No. 8005060198 and Reference No. R-1979-4, Agreement and Covenant Constituting a Contract Rezone, (1998), City of Edmonds and Port of Edmonds. U) U) a� Ordinance No. 3411 and Reference No. R-2002-38, Covenant Regarding Use and Future Development N (Contract Rezone), (2002), City of Edmonds and Union Oil Company of California. 0 Washington State 2070-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009), Exhibit 3-12, Washington State Department of Transportation. Final Vehicle Reservation System Predesign Study (2010), Washington State Ferries. c Edmonds City Council Resolution 1263 (2011). E Edmonds City Council Resolution 1280 (2012). w 0 Memorandum: Cherry Point Coal Export Facility Rail Operations(2012), for City of Edmonds Public Works by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. c 0 Washington State Rail Plan: Integrated Freight and Passenger Rail Plan 2073-2035(2014), Figure 4.3, Washington State Department of Transportation. c m E Economic Evaluation of Regional impacts for the Proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point E (2014), for the Puget Sound Regional Council by The PFM Group, Parametrix, and HR&A Advisors. Letter (January 8, 2014), from Washington State Department of Transportation to City of Edmonds. R Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan, Volume2, City of EdmondsAnnex(September 2015), a Snohomish County. c Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2016), City of Edmonds. U. m Letter (March 17, 2017), from Washington State Department of Transportation to City of Edmonds. Y c 0 Letter (April 17, 2017), from City of Edmonds to Washington State Department of Transportation. m Sea Level Rise in Edmonds, WA: Expected Impacts & Recommended Actions (2017), project report by3.1 Disaster Reduction and Emergency Planning Studio, ENVS 476, Western Washington University. N c Topics Related to Restoration of the Edmonds Marsh (2017), project reports by Ecological Restoration E class, ESCI 470, Western Washington University. w New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master- East Side. Harbor Square Redevelopment_ Plan (2014), Port of Edmonds. x w Edmonds Waterfront A ccess 5tudy(2016), for the City of Edmonds by Tetra Tech, Inc. c as Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling Report(2019), for the City of Edmonds E Public Works Department by Shannon and Wilson, Inc. c� 20205ervice Implementation Plan, (November 2019), Sound Transit. a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 47 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 320 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Washington State Ferries2040Long Range Plan (2019), Exhibit 5-6, Exhibit 5-5, Exhibit 5-6, Washington State Department of Transportation. Washington State Rail Plan 2079-2040(2020), Washington State Department of Transportation. Marina Beach Park& Willow Creek Daylighting Project (2020), PowerPoint by City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services. Guide to the Quiet Zone Establishment Process (May 2020), Federal Railroad Administration. https:Hrai lroads.dot.ciov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2020-05/Qu ietZoneBrochure.pdf National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map, panel 1292 of 1575 (revised June 19, 2020), Federal Emergency Management Agency. Comments to Save Our Marsh, document by Washington State Department of Transportation (August 13, 2020). CityofEdmonds Comprehensive Plan (November 17, 2020), City of Edmonds. 2021 Session Laws of the State of Washington, Chapter 333, Substitute Senate Bill 5165, Transportation Budget, §213(5). https:Hleg.wa.gov/CodeReviser/documents/sessionlaw/2021 pam4.pdf#page=29 Media Edmonds City Council pulls plug on beleaguered Harbor Square project (October 8, 2013), My Edmonds News. Council votes to kill controversial Edmonds Waterfront Connectorproject(June 19, 2019), My Edmonds News. Council agrees to zoning change that will allow hotels on Edmonds waterfront (February 9, 2021), My Edmonds News. BNSF Rai/way confirms p/ans to double track Edmonds in 2023, but key questions remain (September 6, 2021), My Edmonds News. Video Calls 0 Note: Consultant firm names below are abbreviated. Full names are: MAKERS architecture and urban � design; Leland Consulting Group; and The Watershed Company. 0 Video calls with Washington State Department of Transportation and Washington State Ferries, City of E Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 12 and November 23, 2021). w Video call with Tulalip Tribes, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (October 18, 2021). Video call with Sound Transit, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 17, 2021). w r Video call with Port of Edmonds, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Leland (October 19, 2021). E Video call with Community Transit, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 19, 2021). Video call with Save Our Marsh, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (October 19, 2021). a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 48 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 321 9.2.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Video call with JSH Properties, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Leland (October 20, 2021). Video call with BNSF Railway, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 22, 2021). Video call with Lund Consulting, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (November 3, 2021). Emails Email from Edmonds staff (October 7, 2021). Email from BNSF (October 15, 2021). Email from Sound Transit (November 24, 2021). Email from Washington State Department of Transportation and Washington State Ferries (November 22 and 23, 2021; February 8, 2022). Email from Long Bay Enterprises Inc. (December 16, 2021). Email from Washington State Department of Transportation (February 8, 2022). Email from Community Transit (February 11, 2022). Email from Washington State Department of Ecology (April 11, 2022). Websites Unocal Edmonds Bulk Fuel Terminal0178, Washington State Department of Ecology. https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/gsp/Sitepage.aspx?csid=5180 Edmonds Marsh, City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services. https://edmondswa.ciov/services/parks rec/discovery programs/explore discovery places/edmon ds marsh TraffcStatistics, Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries. https:Hwsdot.wa.gov/travel/wash i ngton-state-ferries/a bout-us/wash i ngton-state-ferries- planning/traffic-statistics r c 0 SalmonScape, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/map.html The Train Horn Rule and Quiet Zones, Federal Railroad Administration. N https:Hrailroads.dot.gov/highway-rail-crossing-and-trespasser-programs/train-horn-rulequiet- c zones/train-horn-rule-and-quiet E w Washington Geologicallnformation Portal, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources. https:Hgeologyportal.dnr.wa.gov/2d-view#wigm?-1 3628270,-13619098,6072591,6077019 x w r c as E c� a City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 49 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 322 9 9,2,b .2.b E2 0 Packet Pg. 323 1 'f. �- !'k G'. L n"," )Illy,,,I mnurll if 1ptll I 81110111114 mill[$ :11[• EDMONDS WATERFRONT ISSUES STUDY I CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING I JULY 19, 2022 1 9.2.b Project Purpose The purpose of this project was to identify strategic updates and high-level recommendations to be considered in 41 the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to reflect new information about waterfront uses, needs, and issues. • 30 references and 8 pages in the plan are dedicated to Edmonds Crossing • This affects assumptions about the future of the Downtown Waterfront and the Edmonds Marsh City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan J, A&ptad K aemher 17, 2020 Packet Pg. 325 9.2.b Issues Studied 1. Edmonds Crossing 2. Ferry Service 3. Unocal Property 4. Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek Restoration 5. Natural Hazards and Critical Areas 6. Railroad Double -Tracking 7. Waterfront Emergency Access 8. Edmonds Station Access Projects and Sound Transit Service 9. Bus Service 10. Port of Edmonds 11. Land Use and Economic Development Packet Pg. 326 Study Area From the shoreline to 3rd Avenue From Edmonds Street to Pine Street 0 500 11000 Feet11W , "VI No u� �-m: Y A .a•. Edmonds Street ' _ ' Waterfront Waterfront Path Connector - Missing Link (cancelled) Har r_ . - qu a Unocal Property `•� AIR w Bulkhead Reconstruction ;�,7 } 9.2.b w ? N Uj C . . 1 1 y k � Edmonds Crossing (effectively cancelled) -Willow Creek 1 � Restoriation Packet Pg. 327 9.2.b Project Team City Staff rev ED4,, Kernen Lien Environmental Programs Manager Susan McLaughlin Development Services Director Consultant Staff architecture • planning • urban design THE WATERSHED COMPANY" L LELAND CONSULTING GROUP Bob Bengford Scott Bonjukian Nell Lund Pete Heltzel Brian Vanneman Sam Brookham Packet Pg. 328 I 111 ,. pill i! ll�M li;'.Lwo I llj 11 Il llll {;w nmauu p I mnnli L ' ! 9qi v...,.,,, to I . III Ili#iiliilll ill��i �i! Ilillill�l iiul��i �III� II ul � , , -� 1.. �r� j��Yi9',(y �f ".,I 4 �,+. �r%/dr .�_.),�. 1,, _ .�.� 1 - r'�'"-•el; lei 'Ni OMAN f •fir �� f'r � �e-1-♦i..vb vfij a.,►� .�'�' L ; r. I I Y L i f was 4r Work To -Date O - N -a c _ I - O LV Packet Pg. 329 9.2.b Public Outreach • Online meeting in October 2021 with 37 participants • Stakeholder interviews in late 2021 with: ■ Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Washington State Ferries (WSF) ■ Sound Transit ■ Community Transit ■ BNSF Railway ■ Port of Edmonds ■ Tulalip Tribes ■ Save Our Marsh ■ JSH Properties ■ Lund Consulting representing Chevron/Unocal Packet Pg. 330 Research • Over 40 reports and records reviewed to establish key facts • Follow-up stakeholder conversations • Research support from staff at Edmonds departments of Public Works & Utilities and Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Fxe + As pai !dent® Sounc parkin Ian Edt LP Ultimz forpd l r�epq thEvel Edmai Edmonds and Mukilteo Stations ,a��nro City of Edmonds Puhnc works oeparlment City Hall, 2nd Floor 121 51h Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98C20 Sham n &Wilson, Inc. 40C N.34 Street, Suite 100 G Seattle, WA 931 C3 �206f 632-8C20 vmw.sha nnonwilson.com 1 r0� i ry MII SHANNON 6WILSON Packet Pg. 331 9.2.b Key Findings and Recommendations Memo • Incorporates key findings from the research and the stakeholder interviews • Makes recommendations based on the key findings, best practices, and consultant observations • Organized by: ■ Executive Summary ■ Introduction ■ Sections 1-11 on each key issue ■ Section 12 with sources Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study Key Findings and Recommendations Memo July 14, 2022 Executive Summary The purpose ofthis project was to identify strategic updates and high-level recommendations to be considered in the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to reflect new information about waterfront uses, needs, and issues. The Edmonds Crossing projec4 which proposed to relocate the Edmonds ferry terminal to the south end of the waterfront, is not recognized in the Washington State Ferries 2040 Long Range Plan and the Washington State Department of Transportation has made no recent efforts to advance it. The City's long-range planning efforts have been relying upon the Edmonds Crossing project for decades; the Comprehensive Plan currently includes 30 references and eight pages devoted to the project. F+gum I- Owlervarkeygopwr andprolarnm Vie C&nax�r»araftnrsrA*y (MAAMS) The Edmonds Crossing projects effective cancellation also impacts future ownership and uses of key properties, restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh, transportation planning, and several other i nfrastructure a nd planning issues. shows the general relationship between key sites, Features, and projects in the waterfront study area. C"of E�__y I Devekprnwirt Sanla% Plannieg Division rage 1 Edmmds Watertrvnt KV Flndngs and Remrvnerl(mliats Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 332 9.2.b Top Recommendations • Create a new vision for the waterfront Recognize Edmonds location and support the ferry terminal's current • Prioritize Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration • Plan for improved emergency management of the waterfront Packet Pg. 333 ow sommo , iMON9S WdI[RFk0Nfilam, 7"I'll av■idIIIIIIIII • b�� y :j1[Ire 1Ull t W EDMONDS WATERFRONT ISSUES STUDY I CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING I JULY 19, 2022 9.2.b 1 1 Edmonds Crossing Key Findings • The project originated in the 1990's and was active until 2005 • Evidence points to the project being effectively cancelled with no signs of life Recommendations • Update the Downtown Waterfront vision in a community engagement process as part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update (1.A) • Address how each Edmonds Crossing reference should be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan update (13-1.Q) m A p •a m � 9 . � T F—Ed — M „R Washington State Ferries, from final environmental impact statement (FEIS) c W C Edmonds Comprehensive PI Packet Pg. 335 9.2.b 2 � Ferry Service Key Findings • WSF plans three -boat service Edmonds -Kingston to increase service frequency and capacity • WSF has not analyzed impacts of train traffic • The WSF Long Range Plan anticipates a study of Edmonds terminal improvements Recommendatione, • Develop policies that recognize the existing ferry terminal and its current location • When three -boat service or a vehicle reservation system advances, the City should collaborate on joint transportation planning Packet Pg. 336 9.2.b 3 � Unocal Property Key Findings - Ownership • 1991: Bulk fuel terminal closes • 2005: WSDOT enters purchase and sale agreement • December 2017: Cleanup system installed to remove contamination • June 2023: Expiration of the City's state -provided "right of first purchase at fair market value" • December 2023: An assessment will determine whether the cleanup goals have been met • WSDOT will be given title once the Department of Ecology has deemed the site sufficiently cleaned • If deemed surplus, WSDOT will be required to receive fair market value for the property RJ 10 T Department of Ecology Packet Pg. 337 3 � Unocal Property Key Findings - Zoning • The site is zoned Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) under a 2002 contract rezone • If a different zoning is envisioned (e.g. open space), the City must approve a new master plan as a comprehensive plan amendment, a planned residential development, or as a contract rezone. • Alternatively, the City or the property owner may initiate a rezone at any time. .N L >TER PLAN y for VVARDS POINT ED r: LU pi-appgred by r David Evans and Associates,. Inc. `gyp Packet Pg. 338 9.2.b 3 � Unocal Property Recommendations • Exercise the right of first purchase by June 2023, or update the City's legislative agenda to include an extension of the right • Determine the community's desired future land use of the Unocal Property • This public process is expected to result in a redesignating and rezoning of the Unocal Property for open space purposes Packet Pg. 339 9.2.b 4 � Edmonds Marsh & Willow Creek Restoration 0 Key Findings • The main action needed for restoration is daylighting Willow Creek and improving fish access to migrate, rear, and forage in the marsh • A sinuous channel east of the railroad will provide beneficial habitat for fish and other animals • Stakeholders have expressed interest in moving the creek further away from the railroad tracks than illustrated in conceptual designs • WSDOT has no concerns with this if public process, environmental considerations around contamination, and appropriate compensation lead to that conclusion Marina Beach Park %V Willow Creek Daylighting Project P L N Edmonds E Marsh w o D Packet Pg. 340 O 4 1 Edmonds Marsh & Willow Creek Restoration 0 Recommendations • Continue prioritizing the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project • If Edmonds acquires the Unocal Property, update the design options for Willow Creek restoration to optimize ecological outcomes and further improve fish habitat • Coordinate on areawide pollutant control to minimize untreated runoff Packet Pg. 341 9.2.b 5 1 Natural Hazards and Critical Areas Key Findings • Most of the waterfront is within a 100-year floodplain • Sea level rise of 4" — 4' expected long term • The Edmonds Marsh restoration project rise may result in increased flood risk • Large portion of the waterfront is in an area susceptible to liquefaction in an earthquake Recommendations • Plan for flood mitigation as an essential component of the Edmonds Marsh restoration project • Update/modernize natural hazard planning policies Federal Emergency Management Agency Packet Pg. 342 9.2.b 6 � Railroad Double -Tracking Key Findings • BNSF Railway plans a second track between Edmonds Street and Point Wells • It will be located within BNSF Railway right-of-way • Construction anticipated to begin 2024 • Specific design plans are not available 1-t monds $tationa�y. Railroad Avenue — N rn _ a+ 0 M �- W 0 o �M _ Visualization of Second Railroad o Track at the Edmonds Waterfront mo W Legend i Approximate center of existing track 2 x Estimated center of second track W ,. Estimated horizontal clear zone m of second track E t� a Packet Pg. 343 9.2.b 6 � Railroad Double -Tracking Recommendations Create additional planning policies that support mitigation of railroad traffic Apply to create a full quiet zone Seek to minimize construction impacts and maintain Edmonds Station's full function Packet Pg. 344 9.2.b 7 1 Waterfront Emergency Access Key Findings • Approximately 40 trains pass through daily • The "gate down" time currently averages about two minutes per train • Future projections show 60-80 trains per day • The waterfront and marina area west of the railroad have special emergency access considerations because of the isolation • Ferry delays have been documented Photo by Bill Anderson Photo by South County Fire Packet Pg. 345 9.2.b 7 1 Waterfront Emergency Access Recommendations • Create new policies to jointly plan and implement enhanced emergency management services in the area • Pursue a previous recommendation (from the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study) to plan for a midblock pedestrian overpass • Explore an emergency vehicle overpass below Point Edwards to Admiral Way in coordination with the Port of Edmonds and BNSF Railway Railroad Avenues Packet Pg. 346 9.2.b 8 1 Edmonds Station Access and Service Key Findings • Commuter rail service is 4 daily trips compared to 8 trips pre-COVID • Due to financial challenges, the station access projects are delayed by ten years Recommendation • Incorporate the station access projects into the Comprehensive Plan • Support the projects' implementation as soon as possible Inset Map 0 m' st myQ4, e Edmonds Station tin �dmes st %�`C'=:,.oi t' 0 0 Dayton St Hewitt Seattle O Ic Edmonds Station improvements recommender for further study N O E 1. Washington State Ferries parking lot 'a 2. Salish Crossing parking lot W 4. Downtown pedestrian lighting improvements p 8. Additional bus bays at Edmonds Station a 10. Additional on -demand bicycle lockers 11. Wind and rain screening at Edmonds Station (D L 12. Bus transfer timing improvements (not mapped) IL Packet Pg. 347 9.2.b 9 1 Bus Service Key Findings • In 2024, bus service will better connect Downtown Edmonds to light rail • Most lines will run every 15 minutes, requiring new Downtown layover space • Future extension of the Orange Line and a south "emphasis corridor" are unfunded Recommendations • Continue joint planning of the Downtown transit center improvements, and promote more direct service to the light rail stations • Add policy support for bus service improvements on local streets Legend Local Community Transit Routes Express Community Transit Routes Funded Swft Orange Line BRT (opening 2024) IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Conceptual extenson of Swift Orange Line BRT(unofficial) IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Conceptual bus transit emphasis corridor ODowntown Edmonds II11 Sound Transit light rail route and stations (opening 2024) ■ O Joe A. Kunz(er Photo, AvgeekJoe Productions Packet Pg. 348 9.2.b 10 1 Port of Edmonds Key Findings • Bulkhead reconstruction and new administration building plans are ongoing • Harbor Square property is economically stable • No other projects planned Recommendation • As they arise, continue coordinating infrastructure and development planning between the City and the Port Packet Pg. 349 9.2.b 11 1 Land Use and Economic Development Key Findings • Edmonds stands out with its historic character, human -scaled development pattern, and walkable waterfront • The major properties in the study are well -utilized, including Harbor Square, Salish Crossing, and the Edmonds Waterfront Center/Senior Center • The community's vision for the level of density and vibrancy on the Downtown Waterfront is unclear V Packet Pg. 350 9.2.b 11 1 Land Use and Economic Development Recommendations - Visioning • Craft an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront as part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update • The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires for the type and intensity of desired land uses • The vision should reflect market realities, sea level rise, and other conditions •t. Historic Sites Sites on Edmonds Register of Historic Places Rezones Contract Rezones (contractual requirements apply) Single Family N RS-6 Single Porn fly, 6,000sq. ft. lots Multi Family RM-3 Mu(ti Family, 3,000 sq. ft. of lot area per unit . RM-Z.4 Mu(ti Family, 2,400 zq. ft. of lat area per unit - RM-1.5 Multi Family, 1,500sq. ft. of iot area per unit Downtown Business BD1 Downtown Retail Core 6 D2 Downtown Mixed Commercial BD3 D—r— Convenience Commercial BD4 Downtown Mixed Residential BDS Downtown Arts Corridor OR Office -Residential Commercial — BC Community Business �eneral ammarrial Waterfront - _W Comni—toi Waterfront ® MP1 Master Pia' Hillside Mixed Use MPZ MnsYer Plan Hillside Mixed Use Other = P Public Use c j 05 Open space Edmonds Waterfront Center Marina 500 300 0 600 1,200 Feet N Sa(ish Crossing, LLC r® o L D o Packet Pg. 351 9.2.b 11 1 Land Use and Economic Development Recommendations -Economic Development • Continue efforts to finish the waterfront walkway • Adopt policies that support working to attract a hotel operator and associated uses • Consider adopting policies that allow a wider mix of land uses in the Commercial Waterfront zone • Create an adaptive reuse support program • Explore infill/redevelopment concepts that explore the tradeoffs of modest and strategic development capacity changes in exchange for desired public benefits and amenities Packet Pg. 352 Y _Allowl x. f � r1 ■ Ab u I 1 7 � "I mm o:iim-110. i m 94 EDMONDS WATERFRONT ISSUES STUDY I CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING I JULY 19, 2022 O Project Contact a 0 Kernen Lien Environmental Programs Manager O E Kernen. Lien @ed mondswa.gov W Project website: https://www.edmondswa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalld= 16495016&pa eId=18024615 Packet Pg. 354 9.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Position Conversion to 1.0 FTE for DV Coordinator Position Staff Lead: Chief Michelle Bennett Department: Police Services Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert Background/History The D.V. Coordinator position has previously been a .5 FTE. I am asking for it to be converted to a 1.0 FTE due to work load management. This went through the Finance Committee on July 12. Staff Recommendation We would like approval of 1.0 FTE for the DV position so we can post and hire for this job. Narrative For many years the city has run with a .5 DV (Domestic Violence) Advocate position. With DV calls running on average at approximately 400 calls per year, there is more than enough workload for our DV advocate to work full time. If the DV advocate worked 365 days a year, he or she still would not have time to manage, on average, one case a day. As population and officer numbers increase, this need of victim advocacy will be ever more prevalent. In previous years, our part time DV advocate expressed frustration at the lack of dedication and resources toward DV and victim advocacy. The DV Advocate position requires a different skill set working with other experts in victim advocacy and with police and prosecutors as opposed to the human who most often finds resources for the mentally ill, homeless, or chronically addicted. The DV victim often suffers in the cycle of violence with mental, physical, emotional and/or financial domination or cruelty. These elements require specialized services of a trained victim advocacy professional. Such a skill set requires that the DV Advocate possess kindness, support, and connection to the right people. Contracting these services out might not give our community members the dedicated services that they need. Additionally, the person might not be able to access some of our systems due to CAS and other background issues. For these and other reasons, not the least of which is the difficulty in hiring a part-time person, and the general lack of police resources, it is the recommendation of my department that this position be made a full-time FTE. The DV Coordinator is in the budget at a 0.5 FTE, the budget amount is about $55,000 per year. Moving to a 1.0 FTE would bring that amount up to around $105,000, roughly. Attachments: FW_ parking and DV positions Parking and DV Question Effect of Increased Positions Packet Pg. 355 9.3.a From: Bennett, Michelle To: Ehlert, Alexandra Subject: FW: parking and DV positions Date: Thursday, July 7, 2022 16:38:50 Attachments: innaae001.ona Parking and DV Ouestion.pdf Michelle D. Bennett Chief of Police Edmonds Police Department michelle.bennett@edmondswa.gov Office: 425-771-0200 Cell: 425-478-7207 Fax: 425-771-0208 10 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Main Line: (425) 771-0200 Service - Integrity - Respect - Stewardship From: Sharp, Debra <Debra.Sharp@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 16:12 To: Bennett, Michelle <michelle. ben nett@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov> Subject: FW: parking and DV positions Hi Chief Bennett, Dave asked me to reply to your question. Attached is the parking revenue for 2021 and 2022. I've included the pay range for the two full-time positions in question. The DV coordinator is at .5 and the parking enforcement officer is .75. The last page of the attached document includes the current budgeted positions. You will notice the DV coordinator position is budgeted with all the benefits. The ones based on a percentage of salary will change slightly but not much. The part-time parking enforcement officer does not include benefits. Lori from payroll said for medical to add about 40% of annual gross. I think the DV coordinator would give you a good start also. I hope this helps. Sorry it took a bit longer than you requested. I am at my desk if you have any questions —1368. Debra Sharp (she/her), CPA Accountant Packet Pg. 356 9.3.a City of Edmonds Ofc: (425)275-4510 From: Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:49 PM To: Sharp, Debra <Debra.Sharp@edmondswa.gov> Subject: FW: parking and DV positions Deb — can you get this info? I tried looking in the Budget folder but I'm having computer issues and can't view PDF files right now (1) From: Bennett, Michelle<michelle. ben nett@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:35 PM To: Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov> Subject: parking and DV positions Hi Dave - I was hoping that you could give me the total costs of a couple of things: What is the dollar cost of moving the parking enforcement position from .5 to a 1.0 FTE? What is the dollar cost of moving the parking enforcement position from .5 to a 1.0 FTE? Ion 2020, what was the revenue for our parking enforcement officer. Sorry for the short notice, but trying to get this information prior to the 1630 deadline for the personnel committee. Michelle @ Michelle D. Bennett Chief of Police Edmonds Police Department michelle.bennett@edmondswa.gov Office: 425-771-0200 Cell: 425-478-7207 Fax: 425-771-0208 10 Packet Pg. 357 9.3.a 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Main Line: (425) 771-0200 Service - Integrity - Respect - Stewardship Packet Pg. 358 revstat.rpt 07/07/2022 2:52PM Periods: 0 through 13 001 GENERAL FUND Revenue Status Report City of Edmonds 1/1/2021 through 12/31/2021 Adjusted Year-to-date Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues 001.000.354.00.000.00 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 100,000.00 44,811.98 44,811.98 001.000.354.00.070.00 PARK / INDDISZONE 2,000.00 475.03 475.03 Total GENERAL FUND 102,000.00 45,287.01 45,287.01 Grand Total 102,000.00 45,287.01 45,287.01 9.3.b Page: 1 W H u_ Prct o Balance Rcvc O 55,188.02 44.81 0 O 1,524.97 23.7E 56,712.99 44.4( C O U c O N 56,712.99 44.4( d C O r N d 7 C� C al C Y L E L c.i Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 359 revstat.rpt 07/07/2022 2:52PM Periods: 0 through 13 001 GENERAL FUND Revenue Status Report City of Edmonds 1/1/2022 through 12/31/2022 Adjusted Year-to-date Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues 001.000.354.00.000.00 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 100,000.00 6,269.59 6,269.59 001.000.354.00.070.00 PARK / INDDISZONE 2,000.00 113.89 113.89 Total GENERAL FUND 102,000.00 6,383.48 6,383.48 Grand Total 102,000.00 6,383.48 6,383.48 9.3.b Page: 1 W H u_ Prct o Balance Rcvc O 93,730.41 6.2-1 0 O 1,886.11 5.6f 95,616.52 6.2E C O U c O 95,616.52 6.2E d C O r N d 7 C� C al C Y L E L c.i Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 360 9.3.b Police Non -Commissioned 12022 Rates) Grade Minimum Maximum Animal Control / Ordinance Enforcement Officer NE-10 62,220 79,404 Community Engagement/Crime Prevention Coordinator NE-11 65,328 83,376 Domestic Violence Coordinator NE-10 62,220 79,404 Pa rt Ti me Ad m i n istrative Ass ista nt NE-6 51,180 65,3M Pa rt Ti me Pa rki ng Enforcement Off icer NE-6 51,180 65,3M Police Services Assistant NE-7 53,748 68,592 Property Off icer/Eviden ce Tec h n ic ia n NE-9 59,256 75,612 Sen ior An i ma I Control Off icer NE-11 65,328 83,376 Senior Rol ice Services Assistant NE-8 56,424 72,024 yes 1 1 unfilled yes yes 1 yes yes 0.50 yes yes 0.50 yes yes 0.75 .75 unfilled yes yes 3 yes yes 1 yes yes 1 yes yes 3 1 unfilled yes a Packet Pg. 361 9.3.b pyBudDet 7/7/2022 3:30:04PM Position Budget Detail Report City of Edmonds Model: 2022 Date Range: 01/01/2022 thru fiscal 2022 Page: 1 Thru End 2022 Fund : 001 Program : 000 Department : 41 0809/001 DV COORDINATOR .50 Position H 2890 JILL A SCHICK LL o Wages 39,696.00 T- Premiums: acc 408.00 0 .r Premiums: Ig1 792.00 N Benefit: da -- LEOFF/POLICE SUPPORT (E) 349.68 Benefit: 10 -- Cigna Group Insurance 26.64 L Benefit: lb -- Cigna Group Insurance 194.64 m Benefit: ma -- LEOFF/POL SUPPORT (E) 4,962.36 G Benefit: mebt -- MEBT 2,340.96 () Benefit: medcr -- MEDICARE 593.04 >_ Benefit: pens -- PENSION 5,259.12 0_ Benefit: pfml -- PAID FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE 81.84 N O Benefit: va -- LEOFF/POL SUPPORT (E) 57.36 d Total for 0809/001 DV COORDINATOR : 54,761.64 c 0814/001 PART TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT .75 Position O r Unoccupied Position ayi Wages 39,348.00 CY Benefit: fica -- Social Security 2,439.60 Benefit: medcr -- MEDICARE 570.60 Total for 0814/001 PART TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT: 42,358.20 C O Total for 001.000.41 : 97,119.84 C Total for 001.000 : 97,119.84 Y Total for 001 : 97,119.84 R d Grand Totals: 97,119.84 N E t cC Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 362 9.3.c This schedule is to show the effects of increasing the DV Coordinator position from 0.5 FTE to a 1.0 FTE, the Parking Enforcement Officer from 0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE, both in the Police Department, and approving a new 1.0 FTE position for a Public Records Assistant in the Administrative Services Department. Also to show the effect of adding another 1.0 FTE for a Public Records Specialist in the Police Department. Current Annual Proposed Annual Effect on 2022 Budget for Budget Actual - Assume Salaries & (Approximate) at 4 Months of Department Job Description Current Status Benefits 1.0 FTE Employment Police Dept. DV Coordinator Budgeted at 0.5 at Step 7 $ 54,762 $ 107,179 $ 35,726 Police Dept. Parking Enforc. Officer Budgeted at 0.75 at Step 1 42,358 70,826 23,609 Subtotal, Police Dept. 97,120 178,006 59,335 Admin. Srvcs. Public Records Assist. New position, not in budget, assume Step 1 - 73,807 24,602 Total Combined $ 97,120 $ 251,813 $ 83,938 Effect on 2022 1.0 FTE Cost of Actual - Assume (Currently Additional 1.0 4 Months of Approved) FTE Employment 1 FTE is approved in the budget, PD Police Dept. Public Records Spec. is asking for a second position, assume Step 3 $ 92,599 $ 92,599 $ 30,866 Packet Pg. 363 9.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Public Disclosure Specialist Position Request Staff Lead: Chief Michelle Bennett Department: Police Services Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert Background/History The budget for 1.0 FTE position has already been approved. We are now asking for approval for the job description. We are also requesting budget for a second position due to work load. Both of these items where reviewed in committee on July 12. Staff Recommendation I am recommending the job description be approved and budget is granted for an additional FTE. Narrative Public Disclosure Requests (PDR) have become more frequent, in part, due to our current societal norms. The Edmonds Police Department (also in compliance with new legislative initiatives) has been in ongoing conversations to outfit Edmonds PD law enforcement officers with body cameras. In November of 2021, the pilot project for body cameras started with 10 officers wearing them. The feedback for these body cameras was very positive. Originally, the police department asked for (in the 2022 budget) a commissioned officer and a PDR specialist to redact and process body cam PDRs. During the budget process, the commissioned officer position was removed. Therefore, the budget currently allows for one full-time PDR position to be hired (ordinance attached). HR has reviewed and approved our PDR job description, and conversations related to collective bargaining have also occurred. We are requesting from full council that the PDR job description be accepted and that a second position is approved. Though the process of the pilot project, the police department realized that for every hour of body cam footage, it took almost six hours of redaction. Per a conversation with my training corporal today, that number is now about two and a half to five hours per hour of body cam video (some reduction as our training corporal got used to the system). When one considers that up to 55 officers could wear body cameras, the amount of PDR requests and the time to process those requests will most likely become restrictive for all involved. Most traffic stops last 15-30 minutes (depending on the nature of the stop) and calls and arrests can last for several hours. Multiple officers might wear a camera for one incident, and each camera's footage for that one PDR, must be processed and redacted. Two PDR persons might not be enough for our police department, but it is a good place to start. It would make sense to post for both positions at the same time. The PDR job description was approved at the personnel committee meeting held on July 121". It is important that the police department and the city be timely with PDRs. Daily fines occur for failing to comply with PDR timelines. For this and other aforementioned reasons, it is important that the police department receive two PDR positions. Packet Pg. 364 9.4 Attachments: Position Description 2022-07-14 Salary Schedule amendment Ord Effect of Increased Positions Packet Pg. 365 9.4.a City of EDMONDS Washington Police Public Disclosure Specialist Department: Police Pay Grade: NE-10 Bargaining Unit: EPOA - Law Support FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Revised Date: February 2022 Reports To: Sergeant POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision of a Sergeant, receives, analyzes, researches, processes and responds to police public records requests in compliance with State laws, regulations and department policy; collaborates with Departments and staff to coordinate a timely and appropriate City-wide response; works with the City Attorney to evaluate exemptions, makes appropriate redactions and maintains exemption logs and statistics to substantiate compliance; contributes to the development and implementation of records related policies and best practices. ESSENTIAL FUNTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Processes police public disclosure requests in compliance with the WA State Public Records Act, the Model Rules adopted by the WA Attorney General's office, and internal City and Department policies. • Utilizes provided public disclosure software/programs to maintain tracking, documentation and statistics to substantiate compliance with legal requirements and policies. • Communicates with public records requestors to obtain clarification when necessary, prioritize elements of the request, determine reasonable timeframes for response or installments, and keeps the requestor informed on the progress of the request; memorializing the communications in writing. • Provides third -party notification to affected parties as required or appropriate to maintain the balance between meeting public disclosure obligations and safeguarding privacy and confidential information. • Researches, queries and collects all potential responsive records whether active or inactive and regardless of format such as physical or digital to include but not limited to reports, videos, photos and audio. • Collaborates with department members and other City departments on the production of records in response to public records requests; establishes timeframes for responses and coordinates the assembly of requested records. • Reviews collected records to ensure they are responsive, complete and in accordance with the public records request submitted to the Department. Records may contain graphic, violent, and/or disturbing content. • Determines if collected records are exempt from production following established laws and directives; seek legal review and guidance from City Attorney as necessary. • Redacts exempt information from responsive records, physical or digital, using department provided software before releasing records; prepares exemption/redaction logs to accompany the release. • Provides conclusive written communication to requestors upon closure of public records requests; logs and tracks overall timeline metrics. • Maintains applicable logs to support potential collection of fees from as allowed by law and policy. Police Public Disclosure Specialist Packet Pg. 366 9.4.a 2 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Police Public Disclosure Specialist • Provides guidance to department employees on compliance and the requirements of the Public Records Act and City practices when maintaining and releasing records. • Develops and maintains a variety of performance measures documenting volumes and complexity of requests and work effort required to comply with State law, policies and procedures. • Reports on public disclosure operations and documentation during State audits. • Assists the City Attorney in establishing and maintaining legal holds and collects records in response to litigation and discovery requests. • Maintains and updates the department master exemption log and coordinates with supervisor and the City Attorney for review and concurrence for publishing to the public. • Oversees on -site viewing of records or provides copies of requested records to fulfill requests; maintains records of all public records requests and responses to such requests. • Maintains, archives and purges records according to City retention policies and Washington State law. • Responds to general inquiries from the public; provides information, instructions, and assistance to assist customers having business with the City. • Supports the relationship between the City of Edmonds and the constituent population by demonstrating courteous and cooperative behavior when interacting with clients, visitors, and City staff; promotes City goals and priorities in compliance with all policies and procedures. • Perform other duties as assigned. Required Knowledge of: • The Public Records Act (RCW 42.56) • State records management statutes and guidance. • Police Department policies, procedures and general orders. • Modern office practices and processing tools for applicable programs and media. • Customer service principles • English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Skill and Ability to: • Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing, with tact and courtesy. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with public officials, City staff, and the general public. • Work independently as well as collectively. • Interpret and apply new information. • Conduct thorough file and document searches in electronic and paper document filing systems. • Analyze large volumes of complex information while consistently applying laws/standards. • Work under pressure and maintain deadlines • Organize and manage workload; make decision necessary to respond to information requests in an expeditious manner. • Work effectively with individuals and agencies with a variety of backgrounds and purposes. • Read reports, view and listen to audio records, photographs and videos that may contain disturbing information involving sex crimes, serious assaults, homicide and fatality collisions. • Maintain strict confidentiality and exercise discretion when handling sensitive information. • Encourage a work environment free of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. • Support diversity and multicultural understanding in the workplace. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Police Public Disclosure Specialist Packet Pg. 367 9.4.a 3 of 3 JOB DESCRIPTION Police Public Disclosure Specialist Education and Experience: Associates Degree in Records/Information Management, Library Science, Business Administration, or related field AND two (2) years of general office, communications, or customer support experience that includes records management. Experience dealing with confidential information and records in a law enforcement, judicial office or similar environment is preferred; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience which allows the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions of the position. Licensing and Certifications: • Valid WA State Driver's License and a driving record acceptable to the City's insurance requirements. • Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check. • Obtain Washington State ACCESS System Certification (Level II) and CJIS Certification upon hire. • Obtain Public Records Officer certification within three (3) years of hire date. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Office environment. • Constant interruptions. Physical Abilities: • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. • Reading and understanding a variety of materials. • Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment. • Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time. • Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Hazards: • Contact with dissatisfied and/or abusive customers. Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Date: Date: Police Public Disclosure Specialist Packet Pg. 368 9.4.b CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE BUDGETED FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED THROUGH THE 2022 BUDGET BY ADDING CERTAIN NEW POSITIONS WITH CORRESPONDING SALARY RANGES. WHEREAS, RCW 35A.33.050 requires the salary or salary range for each office, position or job classification to be set forth separately together with the title or position designation thereof in the city's budget; and WHEREAS, the 2022 adopted budget (page 17) included various full time equivalent positions by department to authorize hiring and maintenance of staff at certain levels; and WHEREAS, the 2022 adopted budget (pages 177 through 180) includes the approved salary ranges for each position; and WHEREAS, the mayor has determined that the city should create certain new positions during this budget cycle; and WHEREAS, no additional appropriation for 2022 would be required to create these positions because there is more than adequate salary savings in the general fund due to various vacancies in other positions; and WHEREAS, even though adequate funds exist in the general fund, it is still necessary for the city council to approve these new positions and their salaries before hiring can occur; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The city council hereby approves the addition of the full time equivalent positions and their corresponding salary ranges as shown on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Packet Pg. 369 9.4.b Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. PASSED by the City Council this day of July 2022. APPROVED MAYOR, MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 2 Packet Pg. 370 9.4.b APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: By: CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE: ORDINANCE NO: Packet Pg. 371 9.4.b Q Packet Pg. 372 9.4.b SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On July _, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, adopted Ordinance No. the main point of which may be summarized by its title as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE BUDGETED FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED THROUGH THE 2022 BUDGET BY ADDING CERTAIN NEW POSITIONS WITH CORRESPONDING SALARY RANGES. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of July, 2022. SCOTT PASSEY, CITY CLERK 5 Packet Pg. 373 9.4.c This schedule is to show the effects of increasing the DV Coordinator position from 0.5 FTE to a 1.0 FTE, the Parking Enforcement Officer from 0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE, both in the Police Department, and approving a new 1.0 FTE position for a Public Records Assistant in the Administrative Services Department. Also to show the effect of adding another 1.0 FTE for a Public Records Specialist in the Police Department. Current Annual Proposed Annual Effect on 2022 Budget for Budget Actual - Assume Salaries & (Approximate) at 4 Months of Department Job Description Current Status Benefits 1.0 FTE Employment Police Dept. DV Coordinator Budgeted at 0.5 at Step 7 $ 54,762 $ 107,179 $ 35,726 Police Dept. Parking Enforc. Officer Budgeted at 0.75 at Step 1 42,358 70,826 23,609 Subtotal, Police Dept. 97,120 178,006 59,335 Admin. Srvcs. Public Records Assist. New position, not in budget, assume Step 1 - 73,807 24,602 Total Combined $ 97,120 $ 251,813 $ 83,938 Effect on 2022 1.0 FTE Cost of Actual - Assume (Currently Additional 1.0 4 Months of Approved) FTE Employment 1 FTE is approved in the budget, PD Police Dept. Public Records Spec. is asking for a second position, assume Step 3 $ 92,599 $ 92,599 $ 30,866 Packet Pg. 374 9.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 New Public Records Associate Position Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History The Administrative Services Department currently has one Public Records Officer who responds to Public Records Requests for the City, other than requests that go to the Police Department. The demand placed on the City's Public Records Responders has grown dramatically over the last few years, to a pace that we can no longer keep up with. We are submitting this proposal at the same time that the Police Department is submitting similar proposals, so that Council can see them and discuss them at the same time. (This is a separate agenda item mostly because it comes from a different department.) The currently posted salary for an NE-9 is from $4,909 to $6,088 monthly. See attachment for additional information. Staff Recommendation Staff is asking for 1) a new Job Description to be approved for a Public Records Assistant and 2) a new position to be approved, so that we can fill the position, after being placed on Consent for the July 19 full council meeting. Attachments: Public Records info Public Records Assistant JD Draft Effect of Increased Positions Packet Pg. 375 9.5.a Additional background related to the request for a new Public Records Assistant position We have 24 Public Records Requests open as of July 1, which is the most we have had at once time for a long time. Public Records Requests that we have received and are currently open will take an estimated 10 years to fully process and close, at our current rate. We had 285 Public Records Requests opened between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2021. We have had 178 Public Records Requests opened between 1/1/2022 and 7/1/2022. We have successfully closed 462 Public Records Requests between 1/1/2021 and 7/1/2022. This includes requests that were opened prior to 2021 but were closed within that date range. These numbers are simply the total requests made, and do not reflect the time spent searching a� for, reviewing, redacting records; emails, texts, reaching out to Staff and working with the U 0 Attorneys. Nor does it reflect in-house records requests such as the Attorneys asking for Q records for investigations, etc. or working on lawsuit discovery projects. We only have one person in Administrative Services to manage this workload. This workload 0 U W leaves no time to draft policies, make process improvements, do public records training for .2 staff, or take time off. a This proposal would place the new Public Records Assistant job at an NE-9 pay range, which is the same as the other Administrative Assistant positions in the Department and two pay ranges lower than the Public Records Officer position. This would allow for the opportunity for growth in the position over time. Packet Pg. 376 9.5.b City of EDMONDS Washington Public Records Associate �yOV e -40 Department: Administrative Services Pay Grade: NE-9 Bargaining Unit: AFSCME FLSA Status: Non -Exempt Revised Date: Reports To: Deputy Administrative Services Director POSITION PURPOSE: Under administrative direction, analyzes, processes and responds to public records requests; receives and reviews requests, communicates with requestors for clarification when needed, and collaborates with Departments to coordinate a timely and appropriate City-wide response; works with the Public Records Officer and/or City Attorney to evaluate exemptions, make appropriate redactions and to maintain exemption logs and statistics to substantiate compliance with the Public Records Act requirements, the Model Rules, and City policy; Serves as the Public Records Officer backup. ESSENTIAL FUNTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Coordinates timely and appropriate responses to public disclosure requests. • Updates tracking log, documentation, and statistics to substantiate compliance withPublic Records Act requirements, the Model Rules, and internal City policy. • Administers the public disclosure software used for on-line requests and tracking. • Communicates with requestors to ensure timely and full assistance on public disclosure requests. Clarifies and prioritizes elements of the request, estimates reasonable timeframes for response, and memorializes these communications in writing. • Provides preliminary research on the location of responsive records and collaborates with departments on production of records responsive to requests. Establishes timeframes for responses. Coordinates assembly of multi -departmental responses. • Reviews collected records to ensure they are responsive, complete and in accordance with the request submitted to the City. • Conducts research and analysis to determine if collected records are exempt from production and coordinates with the City Attorney for review of records determined to be exempt. Redacts exempt information before releasing records. • Assists the Public Records Officer and/or City Attorney in establishing and maintaining legal holds and collects records in responseto litigation and discovery requests. • Provides routine updates on the status of requests and performance measures. • Reports on public disclosure operations and documentation as needed. Public Records Officer Last Reviewed Last Revise Packet Pg. 377 9.5.b 2of3 JOB DESCRIPTION Public Records Officer • Oversees on -site viewing of records or provides copies of requested records to fulfill requests; maintains records of all public records requests and responses to such requests. • Serves as Public Records Officer backup. Required Knowledge of: • Knowledge of records management and public disclosure laws, regulations, and policies. • Skill in gathering records, organizing the information and providing timely responses. • Skill in communicating both orally and in writing. • Ability to work in a complex records and information environment involving application and interpretation of rules, regulations and policies. • Ability to analyze large volumes of complex information under strict legal deadlines. a� a • Ability to maintain strict confidentiality and exercise discretion and sound decision making when handling y sensitive documents. v, • Ability to conduct file and document searches in electronic and paper document filing systems. a v, • Ability to work with technical staff to access records in electronic file formats from various storage systems. o • Ability to communicate with customers and to form relationships. • Ability to document information regarding research, practices and resources. 2 • Ability to handle multiple and competing deadlines and priorities, organize and manage workload, and make decision necessary to respond to information requests in an expeditious manner. a • Ability to work cooperatively and respectfully with the public and staff. Ability to safely work in office or from home as -needed, and remain flexible to working in office or home due to public health -related situations. Required Skill in: MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Bachelor's degree or equivalent in records/information management library science, business, or related field One year of clerical experience, including records management. Any combination of relevant education and experience that would enable the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions of the position. Licensing and Certifications: Public Records Officer Certification or the ability to obtain within three (3) years. PaFalegal G8l4ifiGati„n is referred Driver's license required if driving City vehicles. Must be able to successfully complete pass a background check. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Office environment • Constant interruptions Physical Abilities: Public Records Officer Last Reviewed Last Revise Packet Pg. 378 9.5.b 3of3 JOB DESCRIPTION Public Records Officer • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. • Reading and understanding a variety of materials. • Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment. • Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time. • Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Hazards: • Contact with angry and/or dissatisfied customers. Incumbent Signature: Date: Department Head: Date: Public Records Officer Last Reviewed Last Revise Packet Pg. 379 9.5.c This schedule is to show the effects of increasing the DV Coordinator position from 0.5 FTE to a 1.0 FTE, the Parking Enforcement Officer from 0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE, both in the Police Department, and approving a new 1.0 FTE position for a Public Records Assistant in the Administrative Services Department. Also to show the effect of adding another 1.0 FTE for a Public Records Specialist in the Police Department. Current Annual Proposed Annual Effect on 2022 Budget for Budget Actual - Assume Salaries & (Approximate) at 4 Months of Department Job Description Current Status Benefits 1.0 FTE Employment Police Dept. DV Coordinator Budgeted at 0.5 at Step 7 $ 54,762 $ 107,179 $ 35,726 Police Dept. Parking Enforc. Officer Budgeted at 0.75 at Step 1 42,358 70,826 23,609 Subtotal, Police Dept. 97,120 178,006 59,335 Admin. Srvcs. Public Records Assist. New position, not in budget, assume Step 1 - 73,807 24,602 Total Combined $ 97,120 $ 251,813 $ 83,938 Effect on 2022 1.0 FTE Cost of Actual - Assume (Currently Additional 1.0 4 Months of Approved) FTE Employment 1 FTE is approved in the budget, PD Police Dept. Public Records Spec. is asking for a second position, assume Step 3 $ 92,599 $ 92,599 $ 30,866 Packet Pg. 380 9.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/19/2022 Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) Training (Part 2) Staff Lead: Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Department: City Attorney's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative The city attorney will continue with the OPMA training. The first part of this training took place on February 25, 2022, during the city council retreat. There was not time during the retreat to complete the training. Also, the legislature amended the OPMA after February 25, 2022. So, the training will cover the 2022 amendments. Packet Pg. 381