2022-07-26 City Council - Full Agenda-3233o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
tn.. ISLP REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
JULY 26, 2022, 7:00 PM
PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR
THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING
ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A
VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY
DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO
UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND
OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL
MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3. ROLL CALL
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. Development Services Activity Report (30 min)
5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE
AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO
THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE.
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 26, 2022
Page 1
7. RECEIVED FOR FILING
1. Outside Boards and Committee Reports (0 min)
8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 19, 2022
2. Approval of Council Committee Minutes
3. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 19, 2022
4. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
5. Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
6. Claim for Damages from Robert Bretz & Christina Schrum
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Process for Filling Council Vacancy - Position #1 (20 min)
2. Report on Construction Bids for the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Project (10 min)
3. Award Construction Contract for the 76th Overlay Project (10 min)
4. Position Conversion to 1.0 FTE for DV Coordinator Position (10 min)
5. Public Disclosure Specialist Position Request (10 min)
6. New Public Records Associate Position (10 min)
7. Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) Training (Part 2) (45 min)
8. Repeal of safe gun storage and related laws after Washington Supreme Court's field preemption
ruling (10 min)
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 26, 2022
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Development Services Activity Report
Staff Lead: Susan McLaughlin
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Kernen Lien
Background/History
Every year the Development Services Department updates the City Council on development activities in
the city.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
An update on development activities will be presented to the City Council. It includes the following:
Development Services COVID response;
General information about permitting and revenues;
Illustrations of development projects; and
Comprehensive Plan Performance Measures
While COVID has added extra challenges, permitting activity was at historic highs 2021 and development
in Edmonds continues at a healthy pace.
Attachments:
Development Services Presentation
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
IOL J Zvi I AYR I I MOU I
playing$] M
L1
SUSANMCLAUGHLIN I Development Services Director
LEIF BJORBACK I Building Official
r
>00
0
y FD
c: Q
Packet Pg. 4
4.1.a
Agenda
• COVID Response
• Permit Activity
• Key Developments
• Comp Plan Performance Measures
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
of PD4
E
c: Q
Packet Pg. 5
4.1.a
COVID
RESPONSE
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
,O � O�
0 w 1"
E
jFD
Ot n[C U
U Q
Packet Pg. 6
4.1.a
COVID
RESPONSE
• Electronic permitting activities
• MyBuildingPermit.com is the online
portal for managing permit
applications
• Pre -application meetings continue
over Zoom
• Customer feedback on electronic
processes is positive
June 21, 2022
Welcome to MyBuildingPer
One -stop portal for development service application-s, =
inspection scheduling, permit status information -i�
and tip sheets for government agencies.
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
_
0
U)
E
0.
0
0
E
oy PDT
Q
Packet Pg. 7
4.1.a
CITY HALL
REOPENING
June 21, 2022
• City hall reopened to the public in
March
Hours 10am-2pm Monday -Friday
• Majority of staff are utilizing hybrid
work model
r
L
0
Q
a
N
V
d
E
0-
0
0
0
L
• Customer assistance is provided in -
person, virtual, or over phone and/or
email
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
0
0.
0
0
E
�� FD t
o �r� c
r
c: Q
Packet Pg. 8
4.1.a
CUSTOMER
SURVEY
June 21, 2022
Surveyed 29 users of the online
permitting system in February 2022.
• —90% of respondents stated they y
were satisfied with the online permit
process a nd overall customer service
0
• Most respondents (53%) stated they
did not require in -person service
• Zoom meetings remain a popular,
time -efficient option
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
L
U)
r
0.
0
0
of PD4
E
c: Q
Packet Pg. 9
4.1.a
IN -PERSON
SERVICE
June 21, 2022
Effort to be most efficient with staff time o
while providing in -person customer service.
Staff has been tracking demand since
reopening: y
• Average 2.6 customers/day OL
• Average visit of 13 minutes
O
• Less than 10% of visits require follow up
Demand
by Division
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
■ Planning
■ Building
Engineering
E
of PD4
c: Q
Packet Pg. 10
4.1.a
PERMIT
ACTIVITY
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
E
�t FD
O n"[C C1
U Q
Packet Pg. 11
4.1.a
REASONS
FOR
GETTING A
PERMIT
June 21, 2022
w
Helps protectpropertyvalueCL
a
N
V
Makes selling property easier y
E
0-
0
Reduces liability
.0
3
m roves safetyp
E
0.
It's req u i red (D
o
E
of PD4
c: Q
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department Packet Pg. 12
4.1.a
r
L
PERMIT ACTIVITY HISTORY O
Q
N�
ci
Q
N
$2,000,000 2,000
a�
$1,800,000----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,800 y
c
a�
E
$1,600,000 1,600
0
(D
$1,400,000------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ �' 0--
i 1,400 0
$1,200,000----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,200
0
r
2
c
$1,000,000------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 1,000
as
a�
L
$800,000----------------------------------------------- ------------------- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -------------- ------ 800
$600,000----------------- ------------ 600
U)
$400,000----------------------------------------------------------- 400
E
0.
$200,000 - ' , #' 200 .22
as
$0 TI T 0
Ln C0 r— 00 O O r-I N M t Ln CO I-- 00 O O r-i N M zt Ln C0 I` 00 M O r-I N M zl- Ln CO I-- M O O rl
00 x 00 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rl r-I rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl N N
M O M O M O M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O E
-I T -I -I T -I TH -I rl -I rl -I T -I 1 -I T -I TH T -I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N oy
Total Devel Svc Revenue # Building Permits `~ a
June 21, 2022 City of Edmonds I Development Services Department Packet Pg. 13
4.1.a
BUILDING
PERMITS
ISSUED
BY TYPE
June 21, 2022
New
Single Family
Duplex
Apartment/Condo
Commercial
Mixed Use (Office/condo)
Additions/ Alterations
Single Family
Apartment/ Condo
Commercial
Other
Mechanical / Plumbing
Demolition
Miscellaneous
32
33
$13,220,676
1(2 Units)
2 (202 units)
9 (44 Units)
$27,298,995
1$2,456,999
0
0
148
150
$8,678,810
NOW
36
$754,563
42
52
$6,124,564
470/333 652/400
21 12
256 287 $1,848,609
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
r
E.
0
2021
r
Valuation
>
r
ci
a
$13,128,167 .Z
$388,462 jco
$8,461,547 E
CL
m
m
.M
r-
0
$10,598,819 N
$2,171,982 a
$5,457,568 .02
L
E
0.
0
$1,157,270
oy FDI,
Packet Pg. 14
4.1.a
ENGINEERING PERMITS ISSUED
Permits Issued
Permit Revenue
Inspection &
Review Revenue
June 21, 2022
$58y221
$249,427
447
$41y595
$223,678
$55y433
$2487499
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
E'AV, A V, A
r
L
O
Q
N�
ci
El
N
O
d
C
d
E
0-
0
d
0
0
$87yO8O
3
L
$2127935 Q
O
0
of PD4
E
c:
Q
Packet Pg. 15
4.1.a
IMPACT FEES +
GENERAL FACILITY CHARGES s
Transportation Impact Fees
Parks Impact Fees
Water G FC
Sewer G FC
Storm GFC
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
$2927730
$1347282
$2747541
$1289373
$519149
E
oj� PjD4
r
Q
Packet Pg. 16
SOLAR
PERMITS
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Totals
# of Permits
0
a
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
4.1.a
INSPECTIONS
�E.
June 21, 2022
41831
31419
Engineering
235
Planning+ Fire
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
Average Number of o
Building Inspections
per Working Day
a
N
V
23.9
(2019) 0
0-
0
0
17.4
(2020)
19.2
(2021) 00.
0
0
E
oy PDT �
Q
Packet Pg. 18
4.1.a
DEVELOPMENT
ACTIVITY
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
E
�t FD
O n"[C C1
U Q
Packet Pg. 19
�r
ain Street
Civic Field II:=
KEY PROJECT MArcommons _ ..... Fit"
MEMi Bell St Apts. [in■���'-
oil,
WWTP
Port Office Carbon
Building Recove
GBH Holdings
Pine Park
Edmonds Way
PRD�1IMY
a
Issued
F Applied
Design Review
l Pre-App
Rezone
m.
8
i
Paradise Heights _
Kisan!
Westgate Apts.
Station
Brass Tack k
50
IMuGlacier
f Environmental
Ford Hunter
Townhomes,�T
N�
U
Housing
Sunde""""'. Hope
■ sd Townhomes*
F►
aEdmonds
Crossing Apts.
r e
Terrace
TA
•..j G R E
Apartment
Apollo Apts.
Edmonds
Townhomes
Place � M'
� �ra A
ri � w
4.1.a
Green[
ownhoi
Ant olog
Se ' r Livid
N
CDi
v
nIii
� F
r
01 ca
d
o
Packet Pg. 20 1
4.1.a
Wastewater
Treatment
Plant
Issued Carbon Recovery
Project 1 200 - 2nd Ave. S
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
r—
U)
E
0.
0
0
t
01PD4
c: Q
Packet Pg. 21
4.1.a
June 21, 2022
E Apartments
Issued 1 192 New Residential Units 1 23400 Highway 99
MFTE Application: 20 moderate -income and 20 low-income
I— M M � AV
U nde
0n Domes
=I4.0
,Apo rt m en,
Housing
How --a
Edmonds
Terrayetij/ i
Edmonds Place ssi��lpts..� a
gum
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
LW,Oy FDA z
c �
Q
Packet Pg. 22
4.1.a
June 21, 2022
Anthology of Edmonds
Issued 1 127 New Senior Living Units I
-
21200 - 72nd Ave. W
F
0
a
a�
o:
r
2
r
L)
a
N
N
V
E
a-
0
Greenhill
i OU, Glacier 'Townhornes
E nvi ron me naI r
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
yen
y
c
a�
Ol ogy . .�,, o
r Living
0
:99
Ir
�y FD -5
o v
Q
Packet Pg. 23
4.1.a
Bell St. Apartments
Issued
1 4 New Residential Units
1 650 Bell St.
Port Office
AiNg��
� W`40�clri vic Field
A�10
WVVTP 9�0
Carbor,
Recovery'
UN■
%W-14110MMM"
Edmonds
:L PRD
Bel St Apts.
I
1!Y1111111111 -
ro �4 ��- -,
rdlYl�t
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
4.1.a
Main St. Commons
Issued I Retail, Restaurant, and Event Space 1 550/558 Main St.
now
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Se
E
4.1.a
Edmonds Crossing
Issued 1 10 New Residential Units 1 23830 Edmonds Way
Mnde'
Town homes
q!rmqrT
dmonds
M— 0 111b
irtment1
rarnor
Townho
Am
MMW.Ad�n
i AM M - W
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
4.1.a
M
Koisan Townhomes
Issued 1 18 New Residential Units 1 22810 Edmonds Way
M -9 jj1.,Mj
aradise Heig
Kisan�
Westgate�'
Station '
brassTack
win
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
Packet Pg. 27
4.1.a
Ford Hunter Townhomes
Issued 1 4 Unit Townhomes 1 7528 - 215t" St. SW
Greenhill
Townhomes
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
4.1.a
Issued
Heights
aradise
12 New Residential Units 1 550 Paradise Lane
June 21, 2022 City of Edmonds I Development Services Department Packet Pg. 29
4.1.a
Edmonds Townhomes
1
June 21, 2022
Issued 1 4 Unit Townhome
8029 - 238t" St. SW
r
IMP Housing
Su ride Hope
Tory homeydf�
Edmonds PI ,
[?*Crossing Apt�,O
vr
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
r
L
O
Q
N�
r
r
ci
a
N
N
V
E
a-
0
0
G FEE
O
T--Alpartment
L
Apollo Apts.
Edmonds
L Pi 0-
WA id. o
E
�� FD z
o v
Q
Packet Pg. 30
4.1.a
Civic Field
Issued Park Updates 300 - 6t" Ave. N
E
4W AW -� o
=_
�
4.,ain Street Civic Field o
Commons°
..� a. Bell St Apts.
DTP GBH Hol n
Pert Office Cab
BuildingRecovery. � r°
M
-
MEOW" = P6
EdmondsWa
PWRE
,� FD z
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department IPacket Pg. 31
4.1.a
June 21, 2022
Apollo Apartments
Applied 1 252 New Residential Units 1 23601 Highway 99
MFTE Application: 25 moderate -income and 26 low-income
1111111dw
5unde
Townhomes
Edmonds
Housing
Crossing Apts.
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
ALMI
Apartment
0
2
0
7 �� p� I I�
Hope N
�.r..,
I Edmonds
Terrace Townhomes
E
r 2
0
PI
Or
PEP
o
E
O PDT �
Q
Packet Pg. 32
4.1.a
Port Office
Building
June 21, 2022
Port Office Building
Applied 1 6,650 sf. New Commercial
Main Street
CrrloC15..:.'.
WWTP GBH Holdings.a==I,
Carbon" --- -- - - � �
Recov r Pine fl � E�
10
9MM1111
City of Edmonds
Development Services
471 Admiral Way
4.1.a
Westgate Station
Applied 1 4,700 sf. Commercial + 20 Residential Units I
W;I
June 21, 2022 City of Edmonds I Developm
9601 Edmonds Way
0
a
4.1.a
Pine Park
Applied 1 6 Live/Work + 8 Unit Townhome
Port Office
Building
June 21, 2022
, A F i Ap 7
a 1 n Street
commons CiVi c Fi el d
� �
W P GIBHWbkJi%s=3
�,
Ca rbon =Recove rVe a �-= a
IMR
�■�■�Illlll�lllllr
614/616-5t"Ave S.
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
a�
cn
E
0.
0
0
Q
Packet Pg. 35
:am[ 11LU 11 I [ I l 11 IVAh
.3i
W-8
4.1.a
Greenhill Townhomes
Design Review
U - fflale
rvironmclentlal
Ford Hunt
Tovynhame
EM
June 21, 2022
6 Unit Townhome
t
Greenhill
7103 - 210t" St. SW
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
0
U)
U)
M
U
0.
0
0
�V FD �
o �� v
c: Q
Packet Pg. 37
4.1.a
Vehicle Access
i
3 0 o
y
N O
00
N
N
a
13'Setback
GBH Holdings
Design Review 24 Unit Townhome 627 -Dayton St.
3-Story Apartment Building
24u,dsae24u,de ,d Pan* Scares
A4po..a*24,M SF
france
Existing Sidewalk
627 Dayton DAYTON STREET n
June 21, 2022
Port OfifiE
.-4 .1 1.
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
F
0
a
a�
o:
r
2
r
a
N
N
V
U)
E
OL
0
Main Street
Commons Civic Field o
-Bell St Apts.
W TP GBH Holdings fir. N
Carbon r'
Ce vie L Pine Park .q= K U)
L'i "M11=1111-1 1 111 1Fdm0 05 Wa
IL�
P i�E
oFDalu vI L
Packet Pg. 38
4.1.a
Housing Hope
Q
N
V
Design Review 52 New Residential Units + Services 8215 - 236t" St. SW y
On -site programs include household management, finance, parenting, and health. Q
June 21, 2022
F
L
[ W PIOM
All U
5unde
Town homes
1;
Edmonds
Crossing Apts.
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
Terrace
Place
0
0
# G FEE
Apa rt m en
Q I Io Apts.
._ --_:6
:d mo nd
y
Townhomes
E
2
0
oy PDT
Q
Packet Pg. 39
4.1.a
1'M
0
a
a�
r
r
a
N
N
V
Design Review New Commercial Office + Warehouse 7509 - 212t" St. SW
Glacier Environmental
■Glacier
Environment
100 P
Ford Hunter
Town home s
E
0-
0
W�C
r
Greenhill
Ton h ofte
2-1
CD
its
It 0I 2
I:
r L iVi n
o
'dlim
j� FD t
o� U
M
G � Q
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
4.1.a
Terrace Place
Pre-App 260 New Residential Units 1 23625 - 84t" Ave. W
Sunde
ownhomes
Edmonds
sing Apts.
June 21, 2022
ApartmenU-
--
*
y
l0 01 CI
CI iR;
CI
CI 5
T
irn 1�
17 ppl 1�
:1 m
�
irn 17
le
m 17
m
II
l0 01 CI
CI !rn
I CI
CI III
i� 17
17 001 17
81 II
i 17
1: II
17
_
l0 01 CI
CI !rn
CI
CI m
irn 17
_
17 ppl 17
81 m
irn 17
1:
mEdmonds 17
l0 01 CI
m_irn
irnrn
le
1177
mII
TerraceTownhomeS
Grni
_!rn.
311
m
_ 1
1
_m
11
III
_m
_
rMIMMUMMON■1 1■ 1■ ■1 1 ■ ml 1■ 1■ ■■1 ■1 ■1 MilEl7mJ■1 Rim
11
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
CD
E
�y FD z
o �� 5
Q
Packet Pg. 41
4.1.a
Brass Tack Investments
Rezone I
I
June 21, 2022
7 New Residential Units 1 9516 Edmonds Way
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
1'M
O
E
0.
0
0
E
j� FD �
o� v
M
c: Q
Packet Pg. 42
Port Office
Building
V/ CAL
+-dw
�iH It= Civic Field
FFA, rnmmnn-r, jgi�
wowL Bell St Apt&
W1 TP GBH Holdings
Carbon
Rarnviar ■� Pi rye .Pa rl M KW '
y
wE c4m v 2 s,
Edmonds Way D
Pre-App 1 16 Lot Planned Residential Development 1 540/550 Edmonds
June 21, 2022 City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
r+
C
N
E
Way �� F.D t
a
Packet Pg. 43
4.1.a
COMP PLAN
PERFORMANCE �
MEASURES -'
v
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
E
�t FD
O n"[C C1
U Q
Packet Pg. 44
COMP PLAN
PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
June 21, 2022
Annually report on:
t�
0
a
m
city-wide and city government energy use
• number of residential units permitted
• average number of jobs within the city E
0
• lineal feet of water, sewer, and stormwater o
mains replaced or rehabilitated
0
• review Capital Facilities Plan project N
delivery results
• lineal feet of sidewalk renovated or
rehabilitated
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
L
U)
E
0.
0
0
PDT
E
o�
�'J
0
Q
Packet Pg. 45
4.1.a
Commercial
Residential
CITY-WIDE
ENERGY
Consumption
Consumption
USE,
ELECTRICITY
up 14% YOY
up 23% YOY2
a
N
N
V
d
CITY-WIDE
E
250
a-
0 0
200
00
O
00 LO Ln
00 L() `�
rn
L6 o
r
CAc
150
M
04
6j 0o
�
00 00
M
04
M 00 o M
O
M M
0)
N
a
00
0000 000
� I
0
100
LO
0
rn M
00 O
Co
M (D
M
c�
50
0
0 o
6 °' O 0
0')°� o�
0o O
rn 00
rn
rn o
c
0
2011
2012 2013
2014 2015 2016 2017
2018 2019 2020
2021 E
■ Commercial Residential
Oy Mu
�
a
June 21, 2022
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
Packet Pg. 46
CITY GOVERNMENT
ENERGY USE,
ELECTRICITY
City Government Consumption
down 9% YOY
9
8
7 00 LO
ti
ti
6
5
4
3
2
1 Q0 ti (0 oM
I � � 'i �
0
2011 2012 2013 2014
June 21, 2022
CITY -OWNED PROPERTIES
N LO N
0 rn
L6
L6
ti � (0 ti L ti
ri 4 14 al
ri
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Electric Utility Street Lighting
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
0
2
a
N
N
V
d
U)
C
E
a-
0
a�
m
0
c
0
r
c
a�
U)
c� a
U)
Uc U
as
c
a�
E
a
0
m a',
1 c
2021 E
FD t
o v
a
Packet Pg. 47
NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL
UNITS
PERMITTED
Target:
Average:
June 21, 2022
112 units/yr.
88 u n its/yr.
Year
Housing Type
SF
Multi
Duplex
ADU
2021
33
44
1
4
2020
32
202
-
6
2019
26
26
2
7
2018
57
4
4
9
2017
60
120
4
7
2016
41
97
-
4
2015
53
4
-
5
2014
46
43
14
6
2013
36
-
-
5
2012
27
-
-
-
2011
15
89
-
5
total 1 629 25 58
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
Demo
(12)
(20)
(16)
(24)
(23)
(16)
(11)
(19)
(19)
(8)
(174)
w
L
0
Net
70 a
N
U
220 y
45
0-
50
168
126 j
51
90
L
22
19 E
0.
103
0
964
;_
j� FD t
Packet Pg. 48
AVERAGE
NUMBER OF
JOBS ADDED
Target:
Average:
June 21, 2022
95 jobs/yr.
220 jobs/yr.
Year
Covered Employment
Q
2021
Not yet released
2020
137084
a
y
2019
127738
`
2018
127480
0-
°
2017
127717
0
0
2016
107883
2015
107677
N
2014
117542
L
`
2013
12,721
E
0.
°
2012
117952
>
0
2011
107880
G��01F` E
a
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
Packet Pg. 49
LINEAL FEET OF WATER, SEWER, AND
STORMWATER MAINS REPLACED OR
REHABILITATED
Lineal Feet
Water Sewer
2021
Replaced 47715 327
Rehabilitated - 37546
2022 Replaced 77016 27369
Rehabilitated - 17934
June 21, 2022 City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
C
O
Storm
L
17569
4,361 0
_ o
of PD4 �
�U
Q
Packet Pg. 50
4.1.a
CFP
PROJECT
DELIVERY
RESULTS
June 22, 2022
Civic Playfield Acquisition and/or Development
Conceptual
Complete
r
p
CommunityPark/AthleticComplex- OldWoodwayHighSchool
Conceptual
Complete
m
Main St. & 9th Ave S (interim solution)
Conceptual
Complete
W
r
76th Ave. W & 212th St. SW intersection improvements
Design/ROW
Complete
>
76th Ave. W & 220th St. SW intersection improvements
Conceptual
Design in progress
r
Q
228th St SW Corridor Safety Improvements
Design/ROW
Complete
y
Residential Traffic Calming
Conceptual
On-goingannual program
a�
Trackside Warning System or Quiet Zone @Dayton and Main St.
Conceptual
Complete
m
Dayton St. and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements
Design
Complete
y
Edmonds Marsh/ShellabargerCr/Willow Cr/Day-lighting/Restoration
Study
Conceptual
y
Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction/ Management Project
Study
On-goingcapital program
Q
Previously added UP projects that are active
Highway 99 Gateway/Revitalization Stage 2
Conceptual
Construction in progress
aa)
238 St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to SR104
Complete
Dayton St. Walkway from 3rd Ave to 9th Ave
Conceptual
Selected Sections Completed
p
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
Design in progress
o
r
New UP proj&=Lpdded in 2020-2025 UP
m
Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave to 7th Ave
Completed in 2020
SR104 Walkway from HAWK Signal to Pine St/Pine St from SR104 to 3rd Ave
Project does not have secured funding
d
Citywide Bicycle Improvements
In-Progress/On-going
N
v
Downtown Lighting Improvements
Project does not have secured funding
Waterfront Re -development
Completed in 2020
ri
New UP projects added in 2021-2026 UP
SR-104 Adaptive System
Design to begin in 2022
E
236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave
Project does not have secured funding
G
New UP projects added in 2022-2027 UP
jM A
d
Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration
Preliminary Design to begin in 2022
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th St- 238th St)
Design to begin in 2022
c
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (220th St- 224th St)
Design to begin in 2022
d
E
City of Edmonds I Development Services Department
y FD t
Q
Packet Pg. 51
LINEAL FEET OF
SIDEWALK
RENOVATED OR
REHABILITATED
Lineal =eet
Contractors
Will be
2021
Public Works
added soon
Private Development
Contractors
1,170'
2020
Public Works
300'
Private Development
3,459'
t�
0
a
m
a
a�
a
C
z. •i
CL
0
_. o
Packet Pg. 52
i,
4.1.a
11113alls
C
O
R
r
C
d
N
N
L
CL
U)
w
u
II�^
V!
E
Q
O
>
E
�t
O FDn"[C 5
U Q
Packet Pg. 53
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Outside Boards and Committee Reports
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
Outside Boards and Committee Reports will be submitted to the Received for Filing portion of the
agenda for last meeting of the month.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The Council is asked to review the attached committee reports/minutes from Councilmember Tibbott,
and his summaries of the Port of Edmonds and the Snohomish Health District Board of Health meetings.
Port of Edmonds:
1. Repairing the bulkhead and walking path is starting soon. There will be a major disruption in
public access when that happens.
2. The Port is breaking ground on their new building, just east of their current location. The old,
cinder block building will be demolished and replaced with a park. The new building will improve the
flow of operations by having administrative and maintenance offices in the same structure.
Health District:
Health District Exec Director Shawn Fredricks announced his retirement for December 2022 or earlier if
a replacement is found. He has served as the interim director since 2019. He remained and served with
distinction during the pandemic.
Attachments:
Approved-Minutes-6-13-22 Port of Edmonds
Approved-Minutes-6-23-22 Port of Edmonds
Pages from Agenda_2022_7_12_Snohomish Health District Meeting
Packet Pg. 54
DocuSign Envelope ID: F819AB42-9B5A-47ED-A5F0-365E7129B7BA
7.1.a
PORT COMMISSION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
(Hybrid Meeting)
June 13, 2022
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
David Preston, President
Steve Johnston, Vice President
Jim Orvis, Secretary
Jay Grant
Angela Harris
CALL TO ORDER
President Preston called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
FLAG SALUTE
�ORT
OF
E D M 0 N D S
STAFF PRESENT
Bob McChesney, Executive Director
Brandon Baker, Director of Marina Operations
Brittany Williams, Manager of Properties and Economic
Development
OTHERS PRESENT
Jordan Stephens, Port Attorney
Neil Tibbott, Edmonds City Council
All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag.
CONSENT AGENDA
COMMISSIONER ORVIS MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED TO INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING ITEMS:
A. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
B. APPROVAL OF MAY 31, 2022 MEETING MINUTES, AS SUBMITTED
C. APPROVAL OF PAYMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $196,220.53
D. PUGET SOUND EXPRESS 5-YEAR OPERATING AGREEMENT
COMMISSIONER GRANT SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Pete Hanke, Puget Sound Express (PSE), announced that PSE has a new boat coming on line. The new Swift Sure
is four feet longer than the current Saratoga, and is scheduled to launch on July 7th. Following about 12 days of sea
trials and tuning up, it will begin operating out of the Edmonds Marina on about July 22°8. He advised that the
Saratoga, which currently has about 4,800 hours, will be moved to PSE's Port Townsend location. He reviewed that
both boats are licensed to carry 149 passengers, and there will be enough inside seating space on the Swift Sure for
all passengers.
Commissioner Grant asked if PSE is aware of the new law that requires vessels to stay further away from the Orcas.
Mr. Hanke answered yes. He explained that there are two groups of Orcas, Southern Resident and Transient, and the
Packet Pg. 55
DocuSign Envelope ID: F819AB42-9B5A-47ED-A5F0-365E7129B7BA
7.1.a
new law relates to the Resident Orcas. Resident Orcas have changed their habits, traveling to the west coast of
Vancouver Island in search of larger and more plentiful salmon. In any given year, their vessels will encounter
Resident Orcas about 12 times. They will encounter Transient Orcas 300 to 500 times and in a much larger geographic
area. The viewing distance for Transient Orcas remains the same at 200 yards. For the most part, PSE vessels avoid
Resident Orcas because its too much hassle to try and judge the right distance, right time of year and right time of day
to view them.
Mr. Hanke commented that anything the Port can do to help with fuel prices would be much appreciated. Off -road,
dyed diesel is supposed to be less costly than road diesel, but the fuel distributors are currently charging more for off -
road diesel, which is not subject to federal tax. Currently, the Port's diesel price is $6.68 per gallon and upland prices
average about $6.09.
Mr. Hanke said he is very pleased with the new five-year operating agreement, and he appreciates all that Port staff
and the Commission have done to support their operations. He said he is looking forward to many years of operating
out of the Port of Edmonds.
Commissioner Preston asked if Mr. Hanke has received any feedback on the positive impact PSE has had on local
businesses. Mr. Hanke said he couldn't answer that question specifically. However, PSE has purchased a lot of food
from the local sandwich shop to serve on their vessel, and they have provided a high -quality product.
Andor Boeck, Edmonds Yacht Club (EYC), said he is looking forward to the Port's upcoming presentation to the
club on the North Portwalk and Seawall Design. Mr. McChesney said that he and Ms. Williams met with the EYC's
event coordinator and maintenance facility person to provide a general overview of the project. From a planning
perspective, the EYC is concerned about the project's schedule, as their facility is typically booked out up to 18
months. He has agreed to stay in close communication with them to ensure that expectations are managed effectively
and disruptions are minimized as much as possible. Mr. Boeck agreed that timing is a big concern for the EYC. He
understands that this is a complex project to manage and the Port doesn't have all of the answers yet. However, as
they book their facility for future events, they will need to notify people of potential disruptions. Mr. McChesney said
the Port's goal is to mitigate impacts and not cause any interruptions in the EYC's business activity, but they won't
know exactly how that will work out until they have a contract schedule.
Commissioner Preston reported that he attended the EYC's last general membership meeting and advised that the
disruption in front of the EYC would likely occur during the winter months versus summer months when there is
typically more outdoor activity. Mr. Boeck agreed to work with Mr. McChesney to schedule the Port's presentation
at a general membership meeting. He noted that if it doesn't occur at the June 281h meeting due to the scheduled
"Change of Watch," the next general membership meeting won't be until September.
NEW ADMINISTRATION/MAINTENANCE BUILDING UPDATE
Mr. McChesney reviewed that, as previously discussed at the last Commission meeting, the City has provided a
"Notice of Readiness" that the Port's building permit has been approved subject to payment of fees and with the
stipulation that the Port is required to provide a Performance Bond for specified contract installations connected to the
City's infrastructure (landscaping, water/sewer, meters, etc.).
At the Commission's request, Mr. McChesney reported that he approached the City with a request that the bond
requirement be waived. He advised the City that the requirement would be redundant and duplicative without adding
any value. City staff took the matter under advisement, and after further research, they found a new RCW citation
that allowed them to waive the performance bond. He summarized that the outcome reflects well on the good
relationship the Port has with the City of Edmonds staff, and the recent decision will save the Port several thousand
dollars and some headaches.
Commissioner Orvis pointed out that, as per the RCW, a bond requirement for government -to -government projects is
against the law and resolving the issue will bode well for the much larger North Portwalk and Seawall Project, too.
Again, Mr. McChesney thanked City staff for taking the Port's request under advisement and helping them find
resolution.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Port Commission
June 13, 2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 56
DocuSign Envelope ID: F819AB42-9B5A-47ED-A5F0-365E7129B7BA
7.1.a
SEA NOTES AT THE MARINA
Ms. Williams reviewed that Sea Jazz was created in the summer of 2012, with the debut performance taking place at
the Port of Edmonds Public Plaza on July 1, 2012. For nine years, the program featured local high school jazz
musicians twice weekly throughout the summer months. This year, to accommodate for the growth of the music
offering, the program has been rebranded to now be called Sea Notes at the Marina.
Ms. Williams announced that, kicking off on June 17th, Sea Notes will feature performances of various musical genres
throughout the week. Student jazz musicians will still be featured during the weekdays, but there will be guitar and
singer/songwriter performances on the weekends. Like last year, Friday nights will be reserved for jazz jam sessions
hosted by various local professionals. In addition, some select special performances will be offered this year, including
Steel Magic Northwest on August 26th and the Edmonds School District Honor Jazz Band on August 281h. She noted
that an updated performance schedule can be found at www.portofedmonds.ore
lnwsledmonds-events7. Posters for
Sea Notes will be displayed throughout Port property and downtown Edmonds, and advertisements will run on My
Edmonds News, the Edmonds Beacon and on Facebook.
Ms. Williams summarized that, with Sea Notes, the Port is proud to provide both local jazz students and musical
professionals with a beautiful waterfront performance venue. Anthony's Restaurant is returning as a program sponsor
and will provide all musicians with a complimentary meal voucher. Jazz Colony is a program partner, as well. Led
by Peter Bennett and Jake Bergevin, Jazz Colony has provided comprehensive program coordination service. The
2022 budget for Sea Jazz ($3,000) will be used towards advertisement and program coordination services for Sea
Notes.
Commissioner Grant suggested it would be good if someone from the Port could start each of the programs off by
introducing the musicians. Mr. McChesney agreed that would be good.
Commissioner Orvis noted that, for two years during the pandemic, the high school students didn't have an opportunity
to play together with their group. Those in the Edmonds School District have done a terrific job of bringing the music
program back to life. He is glad that the Port is supporting their efforts, and they should encourage people they know
to support it, as well. The Commissioners briefly reviewed the history of the Sea Jazz Program, particularly thanking
Peter Bennet for his help with scheduling and coordination since 2019.
COMMISSION MEETINGS FORWARD SCHEDULE
Mr. McChesney announced that the Port would open bids for the New Administration/Maintenance Building on
Friday, June 17`h, at 10 a.m. In order for the project to stay on schedule, he proposed that the Commission hold a
special meeting for Tuesday, June 21It, at 3:30 p.m. to review the bid results and ask for Commission authorization to
award the contract. To avoid having three Commission meetings in June, and without any pressing action items
requiring Commission approval in the weeks following the contract award, he further proposed that the Commission's
regular meeting on June 271h be cancelled. Following the contract award, and with a contractor ready to start, he
proposed that the Commission's regular meeting on July 11 th be scheduled as a "Golden Shovel" event on the job site.
Unless other important information or action items come up, the July 25`h meeting will be at 9 a.m. for accounts
payable approval, a special meeting by definition because of the time change.
Commissioner Orvis asked where the lay -down area for the Administration/Maintenance Building Project will be
located. Mr. McChesney answered that it will be largely contained on site, as well as to the south where Anthony's
recycle area is located.
The Commissioners agreed with the proposed meeting schedule as outlined above by Mr. McChesney.
CITY OF EDMONDS REPORT
Councilmember Tibbott reported that the City is starting work on the Comprehensive Plan update, which is due in
2024. In preparation for that work, the City engaged the services of Makers Architecture to complete a waterfront
study. The study was ready for presentation to the City Council on June 71h, but it was postponed until June 21". He
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Port Commission
June 13, 2022 Page 3
Packet Pg. 57
DocuSign Envelope ID: F819AB42-9B5A-47ED-A5F0-365E7129B7BA
7.1.a
agreed to provide a copy of the report to the Port, noting that Section 10 references the Port's bulkhead and provides
a map showing its location. It also references the new Administration/Maintenance Building and recognizes that,
based on initial studies, the parking structure project will not proceed. However, the report does not mention the new
public amenities that will be provided as part of the North Portwalk and Seawall Project. He said he would raise this
concern and make sure that the public amenities included in the project are added to the report. Mr. McChesney
pointed out that the consultant should have had this information, since they are designing the Port's project, as well.
Councilmember Tibbott shared that a goal in the Economic Development Element of the Comprehensive Plan calls
for the City to continue to "partner with business leaders, organizations and community members, such as the Port
of Edmonds, Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, etc. to leverage business opportunities and to solicit and address
feedback to enhance the business environment." He also referred to the introduction of the Waterfront Study, which
identifies four top preliminary recommendations:
• Create a new vision for the waterfront. It will be important for the City to include the Port of Edmonds in
these discussions.
Recognize and support the current location of the Edmonds Ferry Terminal. There is a movement away
from the multimodal idea and support for the current location.
■ Prioritize Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration. This is a complex and comprehensive project.
• Plan for improved emergency management of the waterfront. There is no mention of the connector, but there
is mention of the problem.
Commissioner Orvis reviewed that the multimodal center, as it was originally envisioned at the south end, is no longer
part of the plan. However, Brackett's Landing is still a multimodal station area, with a railroad station, a significant
bus stop, and a major ferry landing within a 100-yard radius. He recalled the state requirement that development
should be concentrated in the vicinity of multimodal facilities and suggested that the City needs to consider the
implications of that requirement as the legislature moves forward with the allocation of transportation funding.
Councilmember Tibbott agreed that it begs the question of how to manage the people and vehicle flow around that
hub. The nexus is rather crowded already and the additional third ferry, second train line, and the traffic coming down
to the waterfront will likely double the traffic. Commissioner Orvis noted that the Edmonds Ferry has the highest
vehicular traffic numbers in the state. Councilmember Tibbott said it would be helpful to him if Commissioner Orvis
could cite a source for that information. Commissioner Grant noted that the statistics can be found on the Washington
State Ferries website.
Councilmember Tibbott said he heard that it was also the second highest volume ferry traffic in the nation, with the
first being the Stanton Island Ferry. Commissioner Grant noted that Washington State has the second largest ferry
system in the world.
Commissioner Preston asked if the Waterfront Study primarily focuses on the commercial areas along the waterfront.
Councilmember Tibbott said the study covers all of the area south of the marina all the way to the marine sanctuary
that is just north of Brackett's Landing. Commissioner Grant said the boundaries are defined in the study. Mr.
McChesney pointed out that most of the remaining waterfront is made up of critical areas where there will be very
little opportunity for change.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mr. McChesney didn't have any other items to report.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
Commissioner Johnston said he was asked to be part of the Washington Public Port Association (WPPA) Dues Review
Committee to ascertain whether ports are getting their money's worth and how the dues might be structured going
forward. There will be three meetings, with the first in the next week or so. The committee will consist of eight
commissioners and executive directors, representing both large and small ports.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Port Commission
June 13, 2022 Page 4
Packet Pg. 58
DocuSign Envelope ID: F819AB42-9B5A-47ED-A5F0-365E7129B7BA
7.1.a
Commissioner Harris said she reached out to the WPPA about the potential of restarting the communications
committee. She heard back today that they haven't been able to find anything regarding a charter for the previous
committee. They will continue to explore the idea and get back to her.
Commissioner Harris said she reviewed the agenda for the WPPA Commissioners Meeting in July. While she won't
be able to attend, they have a good lineup of topics. Commissioner Preston said there is still one agenda slot open,
and he suggested they do a cyber presentation. While he recognized that establishing an agenda is time consuming,
Commissioner Johnston said he would like to see a bigger variety of presenters, rather than the same companies and
attorneys all the time.
Commissioner Orvis referred to a recent meeting where Housing Hope of Snohomish County unveiled new plans to
partner with the Edmonds Lutheran Church to build 58 units of low-cost housing on property next to the church. While
the units will be offered at less than market rate, they will produce enough revenue to make a profit so it isn't a tax
hazard.
Commissioner Orvis reported that he attended the WPPA's Compass Award event where Representative Tharinger
emphasized the need for local governments to start applying for funding as soon as possible. They expect the next
biennium will be robust, so now is a good time for the Port to request money for the seawall project. Mr. McChesney
reported that Ms. Williams recently presented a proposal to the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office
(RCO) for an Aquatic Lands Enhancement grant.
Commissioner Grant said he has been reviewing potential grant opportunities. He referred to a press release from
United States Representative Larsen about all of the money he got for his district. Unfortunately, the Port is not
located within his district, and apparently, the money has all been allocated. However, although the proposed
allocations have been passed by the House, they have not been passed by the Senate. He said he will be working with
Representative Larsen, Senator Cantwell, the Chair of the Commerce Committee, and Senator Murray to possibly get
the allocations amended.
Commissioner Grant announced that he and Mr. McChesney would provide a walking tour to Paul Roberts, Chair of
the Washington State Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, as well as Ryan Casey, the District Director.
Along with the tour, staff will make a brief presentation and provide lunch. Commissioner Grant said the intent is to
push from the other side to potentially get an amendment to the transportation allocations. He said he will work with
staff to identify grant opportunities that match up with the Port's needs, and he already has identified some potential
grants from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Commissioner Grant said he has also had discussions with representatives from the WPPA on information sharing
and cybersecurity. The Port of Vancouver has four people in their IT Department, and one, Chris Carter, is an
Information Security Analyst. He is also part of some Information Security Alliance Committees (ISACs), which are
formal information programs under the direction of the Federal Government. He had a lengthy conversation with
him, and he provided information that has been presented previously. He sent an email to Jessica Wilson, WPPA
Communications Manager, regarding a potential smaller meeting first. They have also put together a form that will
data mine all of the ports. Apparently, the WPPA doesn't currently know who's in charge of Information Technology
(IT), security or emergency management at the different ports. There are some ways of doing information sharing, as
well as some shared resources. The intent is to eventually have a meeting in Olympia for IT representatives from all
of the ports. Some ports are very well seasoned in this area, but others have almost no one on staff and are using
outside counsel. There is a need to provide clear information regarding the various rules and procedures.
Commissioner Grant reported that he watches the Edmonds City Council Meetings via Zoom. Two meeting ago, he
made some bold statements regarding the need to include the Port of Edmonds in discussions related to the waterfront.
Unfortunately, presentation of the Waterfront Study has been postponed twice. Once the Waterfront Study has been
presented to the City Council, it will go back before the Planning Board for discussion.
Commissioner Grant reported that he attended a 2-day Shoreline Master Program Seminar where he asked some very
specific questions regarding shoreline permitting and flooding. When he talked about daylighting Willow Creek, the
experts thought it would be near impossible to do a daylight on a creek that is on the water. In particular, Snohomish
County has adopted certain rules that would impact this project. Councilmember Tibbott commented that the
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Port Commission
June 13, 2022 Page 5
Packet Pg. 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: F819AB42-9B5A-47ED-A5F0-365E7129B7BA
7.1.a
information Commissioner Grant received at the seminar regarding Willow Creek doesn't make sense because he
knows of other creeks in the City that flowed through culverts and are now daylighted.
Commissioner Grant continued that a lot of information was shared at the seminar about climate resilience and a
number of new permitting requirements. They discussed that obtaining required Federal permits is time consuming,
even for projects that are imperative. He said he would prepare a summary report on issues that might impact the
Port.
Commissioner Grant said he met with Joe McIalwain, Executive Director of the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA),
which is a special district. He took the opportunity to talk about fiber because they are the hub and the backup for the
City's dark fiber. They also discussed the waterfront and emergency management, as well as some grant opportunities
they are looking into.
Commissioner Preston reported that he attended the WPPA Financial Seminar last week. Janea Stark from the
Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) announced that a lot of CERB funding is available.
Commissioner Johnston pointed out that, typically, the rural areas benefit from CERB funding, and Commissioner
Orvis said she indicated that urban projects are becoming more eligible for CERB funding.
Commissioner Preston said he learned at the seminar that some ports have had success with technology to improve
the job screening process. Employees use one-way video interview request that is used to pre-screen candidates before
an in person interview. It can entice people by showing the culture rather than just by a written job description. Mr.
McChesney said the Port hasn't used videos as a recruitment tool, but he agreed it is a good idea. Commissioner
Preston continued by reporting that representatives from the State Auditor's Office were present and seemed pleased
to be working with ports. They provided a lot of good information, noting that there are a number of resource guides
available at no cost to ports. There was a presentation on IT, in general, but he felt that more information should have
been provided from a training standpoint.
Commissioner Preston reported that he also spoke with Patsy Martin, WPPA Interim Executive Director about the
possibility of revamping the Communications Committee. He pointed out how the WPPA needs a plan for
communicating to the ports, to the public, and to the legislature. In addition, they need to build a model that ports can
use to communicate to the public.
Commissioner Preston asked if staff had an opportunity to talk to Anthony's about potentially moving their food truck
to the plaza during the Sea Note events. Mr. Baker answered affirmatively, but they weren't able to make it work this
year, likely because they are short on staff. He said Anthony's is trying to develop a way for people listening to the
music to order food and get it delivered to them at the plaza. He suggested they promote on-line ordering and using
pings to notify people when their food is ready for pick up. Commissioner Preston noted that Anthony's is a strong
supporter of the event, and he would like to make it easy for people to order food while enjoying the concerts.
However, from an economic development and tourism standpoint, he would like to see at least one other food truck
down there to create more of a mingling atmosphere.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
Brett Tubby, Edmonds, voiced concern about moorage rates, noting that a 28-foot slip at the Port of Everett is about
$100 less than the over $400 the Port of Edmonds charges. He questioned why the sublease fee is recurring and why
it increased from $30 two years ago to $40 now. He commented that the Dry Stack fee is too much to only allow
seven complimentary launches a month. He is also concerned that it now costs $47 to launch his boat. He lives in
Edmonds and would rather be at the Edmonds Marina, but he is concerned that the costs continue to increase.
Commissioner Preston asked Mr. Baker to follow up with Mr. Tubby.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 8:21 p.m., Commissioner Preston announced that the Commission would move into an executive session pursuant
to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 42.30.110(1)(i) to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters
relating to agency enforcement actions, or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or potential
litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become,
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Port Commission
June 13, 2022 Page 6
Packet Pg. 60
DocuSign Envelope ID: F819AB42-9B5A-47ED-A5F0-365E7129B7BA
7.1.a
a party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence
to the agency.
Commissioner Preston advised that the executive session would last approximately 20 minutes. Following the
executive session, the Commission would resume the business portion of the meeting. No action would be taken
during the executive session. The executive session ended at 8:40 p.m., and the Commission returned to the regular
meeting.
ADDITIONAL COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Grant said he has talked to a lot of people in an effort to ascertain who owns the Edmonds Marsh. He
learned about a 1981 quit claim deed from Union Oil to the City of Edmonds that outlines the property boundaries
and designates that it remain a wetland and recreation area. Mr. McChesney clarified that the quit claim deed only
applies to the southeast quadrant of the marsh. Commissioner Grant explained that most aquatic lands are divided
between shore owners, and it would be interesting for the Port to hire someone to help interpret the marsh map. It
was pointed out that they have documentation identifying the portion of the marsh that is owned by the Port.
ADJOURNMENT
The Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:44 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Docn Signed by:
lm VTV15E833&ID3
Port Commission Secretary
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Port Commission
June 13, 2022 Page 7
Packet Pg. 61
DocuSign Envelope ID: 78040979-8E46-4653-BA8E-038D96ADC926
PORT
OF
E D M 0 N D S
PORT COMMISSION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
(Hybrid)
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
Steve Johnston, Vice President
Jim Orvis, Secretary
Jay Grant
Angela Harris
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
David Preston, President
CALL TO ORDER
June 23, 2022
STAFF PRESENT
Bob McChesney, Executive Director
Brandon Baker, Director of Marina Operations
Tina Drennan, Manager of Finance and Accounting
Brittany Williams, Manager of Properties and Economic
Development
OTHERS PRESENT
Jordan Stephens, Port Attorney
Vice President Johnston called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m.
FLAG SALUTE
All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag.
CONSENT AGENDA
COMMISSIONER GRANT MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED TO INCLUDE
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
A. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
B. APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CONTRACT AMENDMENT
COMMISSIONER HARRIS SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chris Wolten, Edmonds, asked that the Port consider providing a launch pad for paddle sports in the harbor, as the
current decks are not safe for people getting in and out of kayaks because they are too high off the water. The current
white floating low deck between C and D Docks would have worked well, but it is sinking. He noted that many other
marinas in the area have great paddle sport launch sites. He proposed the following two ideas:
• Add some storage racks for kayaks and paddle sports up against the fence in the south end where the boat
racks are located. A low floating dock could be added between Docks C and D. This would allow a person
to roll a kayak down the ramp and onto the deck. Right now, this space is used for trailers, but it seems to
be underutilized.
Packet Pg. 62
DocuSign Envelope ID: 78040979-8E46-4653-BA8E-038D96ADC926
7.1.b
• V Dock could be used, as it is much lower to the water and appears to be underutilized. Boats could still be
tied up on one side, with the other side for kayak launching. This option would be less desirable because
there would not be any storage options.
The Commissioners thanked Mr. Wolten for his thoughts and ideas and agreed to consider his proposal.
CONTRACT AWARD FOR NEW ADMINISTRATION/MAINTENANCE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
NO. 2022-417
Mr. McChesney reported that, following a very successful bid process that closed on June 17th, Spee West
Construction Company was determined to be the apparent low bidder at $7,275,000 plus sales tax. PCL Construction
Services, Inc., came very close at $7,330,000. Faber Construction Corporation came in at $7,398,146, and Sea Con
LLC came it at 8,066,480. He recommended the Commission authorize him to enter into a contract with Spee West
Construction Company in the amount of $7,275,000 plus sales tax for the base bid for the New
Administration/Maintenance building Construction.
COMMISSIONER HARRIS MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH SPEE WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $7,275,000.00 PLUS SALES TAX FOR THE BASE BID FOR THE NEW
ADMINISTRATION/MAINTENANCE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 2022-417. COMMISSIONER
ORVIS SECONDED THE MOTION.
Commissioner Grant noted that the difference in cost between the lowest and second lowest bidder was not significant.
Beyond cost, he asked if the Port used any other criteria when reviewing the proposals. Mr. McChesney said the Port
does not use a point system. However, staff has spent considerable time engaging with Spee West Construction
Company staff and reviewing their references. They have done a lot of work for school districts, has extensive
experience working for public agencies, and they are a local Edmonds firm. Staff feels very confident with their
recommendation.
Commissioner Grant asked if there were any particular differences in the bids. Mr. McChesney said the only
difference was the dollar amount, since they all bid the same plans and specifications. Commissioner Johnston
commented that the fact that all four bids were close speaks well to the clarity and detail in the specifications. He said
he has a lot of faith and confidence in the process.
Commissioner Orvis said he always worries about having to accept the low bid no matter what, but his research
indicates that the Port has no reason to be concerned about this particular contractor. The company has a very good
reputation statewide. Mr. McChesney concurred. He reviewed that the Port is bound by the requirement to take the
low bid. There must be some exceptional reason to throw out the low bid, and Port staff has found no reason to do
that.
Commissioner Orvis asked who would oversee the project and work with the contractor, and Mr. McChesney
answered that Dennis Titus from CG Engineering would be the project engineer and project manager. In addition to
Mr. Titus, the project oversight team would include Chris Osterman (Contract Administrator), Brian Menard (Director
of Maintenance and Facilities), and himself.
Commissioner Grant requested an update on the status of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
Certification. Mr. McChesney answered that LEED Certification is still a work in progress, and the actual submittal
to the Clean Building Certification Institute won't happen until the end of July. However, Jackson Main and RWDI
recently advised that the project lost two points because the building's electrical systems are not metered separately.
LEED Certification is still within reach, and the Port could potentially get the two points back if they wanted to go
through a rather expensive redesign and change order.
Commissioner Grant noted that the project would likely meet LEED Silver Certification just by following state law.
He asked if change orders would be required in order for the project to achieve LEED Gold Certification. Mr.
McChesney answered that it would be reasonable to expect change orders if modifications to the work are required.
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
Port Commission
June 23, 2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 63
DocuSign Envelope ID: 78040979-8E46-4653-BA8E-038D96ADC926
7.1.b
The Commission would likely need to make some value judgements once they get more clarity on how the Clean
Building Certification Institute will rate the project.
Commissioner Grant asked if Mr. McChesney has any idea what the cost of the potential change orders might be. Mr.
McChesney answered that it would cost about $20,000 to install separate meters in order to get back the two points
that were lost. However, the project would still be slightly short of the points required for LEED Gold Certification.
Commissioner Orvis summarized that the project would result in a 12,000-square-foot administration and maintenance
building at a cost of nearly $8 million. If they were building a much larger and more costly building, some of the
costs associated with LEED Gold Certification might be worth it. However, he would not support significant
additional costs in order to obtain LEED Gold Certification for this smaller project. Mr. McChesney added that it
might make sense if the new building would create a new revenue stream that would enable the Port to recapture the
upcharges for LEED Certification. That is not the case in this situation.
Commissioner Grant asked when construction of the new building would start, and Mr. McChesney answered that a
pre -construction meeting is scheduled for July 8', and a "Golden Shovel" Event is scheduled for July 1 I". The Port
hasn't yet had a detailed discussion with the contractor about the project timeline, but they fully expect to begin
digging by mid -July. At the "Golden Shovel" event, Commissioner Grant suggested it would be worthwhile to note
how the City of Edmonds would benefit from more than $300,000 in sales taxes revenue that will be collected for the
project. Mr. McChesney concurred and noted that the Port would issue a press release announcing the event. He
emphasized that the project would be a significant benefit to the Port and to the community, and they are very happy
to bring it forward to the Commission for contract approval.
Port Attorney Stephens asked if there were any requests for bid responses. Mr. McChesney answered that they
received one last week from PCL Construction Services, Inc., and state law required that they be allowed two days to
review the other bids. In addition, Sea Con LLC requested a bid response. No bed protests were received from either
company. The bid process has been fully vetted and staff is ready to ask the Commission for authorization to award
the contract to Spee West Construction Company without any qualifications.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. McChesney thanked the Commission and complimented staff and the group of architects and engineers who have
been working on the project for the past year and a half.
REVIEW CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER POLICY
With the Commission's approval to award the contract for the New Administration/Maintenance Building, Mr.
McChesney suggested it would be appropriate to review the delegated authority of the Executive Director to approve
change orders without prior Commission approval. As the project progresses, he anticipates that change orders are
inevitable with a project of this size.
For the Commission's information, Mr. McChesney reviewed the current policy as follows:
Port of Edmonds Commission Policy Directive on Administrative Authority of the Executive Director
B. Change Orders: In instances where contracts for the performance of work have been awarded and
under which work is in progress, and individual changes in plans and/or specifications are necessitated
to properly accomplish the work, the Executive Director is authorized, without prior Commission
approval, to execute on its behalf change orders to the contract if all of the following are met:
a. The estimated cost of the aggregate changes in plans and/or specifications, exclusive of
applicable taxes, will not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50, 000), or 10% of the contract
price, whichever is greater.
b. The contract provides for issuance of change orders.
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
Port Commission
June 23, 2022 Page 3
Packet Pg. 64
DocuSign Envelope ID: 78040979-8E46-4653-BA8E-038D96ADC926
7.1.b
C. The individual change order has been approved and certified by the project architect or
engineer as being necessary to the proper accomplishment of the work called for in the
basic contract.
d. The Executive Director shall inform the Commission at the next scheduled meeting of all
actions undertaken under this section.
Commissioner Johnston noted that, as per Item a, the total amount of change orders the Executive Director could
approve without prior Commission approval would be limited to a maximum of 10% of the total cost of the project.
In the case of the New Administration/Maintenance Building, that would equate to between $700,000 and $800,000.
Prior Commission approval would be required if the aggregate amount of the change orders would exceed 10% of the
total cost of the project.
Mr. McChesney emphasized that, as per the current policy, he would be obligated to report on any change order status
at the next Commission meeting. He said change orders are more commonly associated with earthwork, and the site
of the new building used to be an industrial property. They may find some unsuitable material, and possibly even
some contamination. Once construction of the actual building starts, he wouldn't expect any change orders to escalate
to that magnitude.
Commissioner Grant asked where the numbers in the policy came from, and Mr. McChesney said the policy was last
updated in 2020 based on the Port's experience with the Harbor Square Building 3 Project where there were a number
of change orders. Commissioner Orvis questioned if the current policy is sufficient for the larger projects the Port is
currently undertaking, and Mr. McChesney answered affirmatively.
Commissioner Orvis asked if the Commission could schedule an emergency meeting to approve a change order that
exceeds the Executive Director's authority if a decision must be made right away. Port Attorney Stephens answered
affirmatively but cautioned that, in most cases, a 24-hour notice would be required.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mr. McChesney did not have any additional items to report.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
Regarding the request to provide a launch pad for paddle sports, Commissioner Orvis noted that there is a lot more
boat traffic at the south end of the marina than at the north.
Commissioner Grant recalled that he has been involved in the Cascadia Earthquake and Tsunami Project and recently
met with the commander of the Coast Guard, who is head of emergency management for the Pacific Northwest Region
and lives in Edmonds. She advised that the Edmonds boating community has the highest number of rescues in the
Puget Sound area, and she agreed to provide actual statistics. She was very excited to learn that Edmonds is starting
a marine rescue unit.
Commissioner Johnston reported that he and Commissioner Grant put together a draft vision and mission statement,
along with some values. He forwarded the draft to Mr. McChesney for distribution amongst the Commissioners. The
intent is that the documents will be presented at the first meeting in August for Commission approval.
Commissioner Johnston noted that the July meeting schedule had been modified. Mr. McChesney suggested that the
regular meeting on July I I" could be paired with the "Golden Shovel" event. If the Commission wishes to alter the
meeting time, it would need to be advertised as a special meeting. After a brief discussion, the Commission agreed to
a 3:30 p.m. start time on July 11t'. Mr. McChesney reminded the Commission that their second meeting in July would
conflict with the Washington Public Port Association (WPPA) Commissioners Conference. The Commission agreed
to cancel the July 25th meeting and schedule a special meeting on July 215t at 7 p.m.
Port Attorney Stephens advised that there will be an Open Public Meetings and Public Records Act Training Session
will be offered at the WPPA Commissioners Conference. For Commissioners who haven't completed the training in
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
Port Commission
June 23, 2022 Page 4
Packet Pg. 65
DocuSign Envelope ID: 78040979-8E46-4653-BA8E-038D96ADC926
7.1.b
the past four years, attending this session would check the required statutory boxes. Ms. Drennan noted that all of the
Commissioners completed the training in 2022.
ADJOURNMENT
The Commission meeting was adjourned at 10:15 am.
Respectfully submitted,
puco5igned hy-
;i dfn 8338:R3
Port Commission Secretary
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
Port Commission
June 23, 2022 Page 5
Packet Pg. 66
7.1.c
(IFQ SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
WWW.SNOHD.ORG
SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH
AGENDA
July 12, 2022
3:00 PM
3020 Rucker Ave. Auditorium or Zoom: 253-215-8782; ID: 922-5868-2166
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda Contents and Order
4. Special Business
a. Election of Chair
5. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting of June 14, 2022
6. Public Comment
a. Public Comment
7. Consent Agenda
a. Amendment #4 to the consolidated contract with the Washington State
Department of Health (SR 22-047; P. Sampaga-Khim)
b. Amendment #5 to the consolidated contract with the Washington State
Department of Health (SR 22-063; K. Curtis)
c. Amendment #4 with Health Care Authority for the ABCD program (SR 22-052;
P. Sampaga-Khim)
d. Policy POL 130.004 concerning contracts (SR 22-041; N. Thomsen)
8. Action
a. Vouchers and Res. 22-18 authorizing Health District expenditures from May 16,
2022, to June 15, 2022 (no staff report; S. Centanni)
b. Resolution 22-19 rescinding Resolution 21-18 and authorizing the appointment
of a new Auditing Officer (SR 22-064; S. Frederick)
c. Specialty pay for Environmental Health Safe Environments program (SR 22-
048; J. Myers)
d. Youth Cannabis and Commercial Tobacco Prevention Program (YCCTPP)
request for application to fund one lead organization to facilitate and support the
Program's Practice Collaborative (SR 22-059; P. Sampaga-Khim)
e. Addition of temporary term -limited COVID FTEs (SR 22-058; C. Parker, P.
Packet Pg. 67
7.1.c
Aguilar)
Temporarily suspend the Division of Responsibilities and delegate decision -
making authority to the Executive Committee (SR 22-066; S. Frederick)
9. Executive Session
a. The Snohomish Health District Board of Health will recess and convene into
Executive Session for the purposes of personnel matter pursuant to RCW
42.30.110(1)(g) to review the performance of a public employee, pending
litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i), and to discuss with legal counsel
the legal risk of a potential action pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)(iii).
Executive Session is expected to last up to 10 minutes. Unless extended to a
later time, the Board will reconvene into regular session at p.m. and may
take possible action.
10. Administrative Officer's Report
11. Briefings
a. Public Health Integration Presentation (No staff report; S. Frederick)
12. Written Reports
a. Finance Manager's report for December 2021 (SR 22-056; S. Centanni)
b. Finance Manager's report for April 2022 (SR 22-057; S. Centanni)
C. Program Policy Committee draft minutes - June 16
d. Administration Committee draft minutes - June 22
e. Executive Committee draft minutes - June 23
Public Health Advisory Council special meeting draft minutes - June 29
13. Information Items
a. Upcoming meetings
14. Adjournment
Board of Health members:
Stephanie Wright (Chair), Anji Jorstad (Vice Chair), Julieta Altamirano-Crosby, Elisabeth Crawford,
Megan Dunn, Mark James, Heather Logan, Sam Low, Kyoko Matsumoto Wright, Jared Mead, Nate
Nehring, Joe Neigel, Neil Tibbott, Stephanie Vignal, Ben Zarlingo
The public is invited to attend. Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities.
Questions or additional information about the board meeting may be obtained by contacting Sarah de
Jong at 425.339.5210; Relay: 711; Email SHDInfo@snohd.org. To request reasonable
accommodations, please contact Ms. de Jong by the Friday prior to the board meeting. It's customary
at each regular meeting of the full Board to include an assigned period for public comment from
individuals present at the meeting. Generally, the public comment occurs near the beginning of the
meeting and comments are limited to no more than three minutes per person. The Chair of the board
may, as circumstances require at each meeting, reduce the time allotted to individuals or reduce the
overall time assigned for public comments.
Packet Pg. 68
7.1.c
467Z SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
4$ WWW.SNOHD.ORG
Election of Chair
Background
BOARD OF HEALTH STAFF REPORT ()
J U LY 12, 2022
SPECIAL BUSINESS
Section I I I (A)(1) of the Board Rules of Procedure provides a list of specific responsibilities for
the Chair position:
1. Chair Responsibilities. The Chair is responsible for the management, development, and
effective performance of the Board of Health, and provides leadership to the Board for all
aspects of the Board's work. Specific responsibilities include:
• Chair all meetings, unless unavailable, and then coordinate with Vice Chair
• Work with Administrative Officer to set agenda for meetings
• Conduct the meetings in an orderly, fair, open and efficient manner
• Guide and mediate Board actions and integrity of deliberations
• Facilitate discussion and decision -making
• Call special meetings if necessary
• Ensure committee reports are made to the full Board
• The Chair of the Board may appoint other committees of the Board from time to time
as deemed necessary
• Counsel and consult with the Health Officer
• Speak for the Board as delegated by the Board
• Represent the Board to other groups
• Participate in new Board member orientation
• Consult with Board members who are not fulfilling their responsibilities or who are
violating law, policy, or practice or who are unable to regularly attend Board meetings
• Initiate annual evaluation of the Health Officer
• Oversee searches for anew Health Officer and/or Administrative Officer
• Initiate annual evaluation of the Administrative Officer
Section I I I (A)(3) provides further guidance in selection of a Chair:
The Chair of the Board must exhibit leadership ability and provide direction to the Health
Officer and Health District staff. When selecting a Chair, the Board should identify
someone who is actively engaged and concerned with the issues of the Health District. The
Chair may be called on to go to county and city governing bodies to support Health District
concerns and issues. The person selected for this leadership position should be someone
who has the time, energy, and savvy to work throughout the county to represent the
concerns of the Board and the Health District. Given the responsibilities of the Vice Chair
to perform the responsibilities of the Chair in his/her absence and otherwise support the
Chair, the Board should consider similar qualities in selecting a Vice Chair.
I n selecting members for the Chair and Vice Chair positions, the Board will consider the
mix of representation from member jurisdictions in its leadership positions and will consider
rotating the positions among the member jurisdictions. While not required, the Chair is
Packet Pg. 69
7.1.c
encouraged to serve two consecutive terms and the Vice Chair is encouraged to seek the
Chair position.
The floor will be opened to Board members to place a nomination for their nominee or nominees
for Board Chair. Election of Chair will be made by roll -call vote of the full Board.
Packet Pg. 70
7.1.c
# SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
Oi5� WWW.SNOHD.ORG
BOARD OF HEALTH STAFF REPORT ()
J U LY 12, 2022
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of minutes of the regular meeting of June 14, 2022
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
❑ Draft Minutes
Packet Pg. 71
7.1.c
N NO
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
WWW.SNOHD.ORG
Snohomish Health District
Board of Health Minutes
June 14, 2022
The meeting was held via Zoom conference call/video.
Members Present via Zoom
Julieta Alta mirano-Crosby, Councilmember, Lynnwood (Virtual)
Elisabeth Crawford, Councilmember, Mukilteo (Virtual)
Megan Dunn, County Councilmember (Virtual)
Mark James, Councilmember, Marysville (Virtual)
Anji Jorstad, Councilmember, Lake Stevens (In Person)
Heather Logan, Councilmember, Arlington (Virtual)
Sam Low, County Councilmember (Virtual)
Kyoko Matsumoto Wright, Mayor, Mountlake Terrace (Virtual)
Jared Mead, County Councilmember (Virtual)
Nate Nehring, County Councilmember (Virtual)
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember, Edmonds (Virtual)
Stephanie Wright, County Councilmember — BOH Chair (Virtual)
Ben Zarlingo, Councilmember, Everett (Virtual)
Members Absent
Joe Neigel, Councilmember, Sultan
Stephanie Vignal, Councilmember, Mill Creek
Comings and Goings
Neil Tibbott left at 4:07 p.m.
Sam Low left at 5:38 p.m.
Administration Division
Call to Order
The regular meeting of the Board of Health was called to order using a hybrid setting at 3:02 p.m. by Board
Chair Stephanie Wright.
Roll Call
Roll call was taken by Ms. Sarah de Jong who reported there was a quorum present.
Approval of Agenda Contents and Order
It was moved by Ms. Anii Jorstad and seconded by Ms. Heather Loaan to aoorove the aaenda contents and
order. The motion passed unanimously.
Special Business
Proclamation recognizing and honoring MRC volunteers for their service responding to COVID-19
Mr. Shawn Frederick read aloud the proclamation.
It was moved by Mr. Ben Zarlingo and seconded by Ms. Julieta Altamirano-Crosby to approve the resolution.
Board members expressed their appreciation for the MRC volunteers.
The motion passed unanimouslv.
Proclamation recognizing Grant Weed for his service providing legal counsel to the Health District
Mr. Shawn Frederick read aloud the proclamation.
3020 Rucker Avenue, Suite 306 ■ Everett, WA 98201-3900 ■ Ph: 425.339.5210 ■ fax: 42 6 1
packet Pg. 72
7.1.c
NU0
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
WWW.SNOHD.ORG
Administration Division
It was moved by Ms. Logan and seconded by Ms. Kyoko Matsumoto -Wright to approve the proclamation that
Shawn Frederick lust read. 0
Board members expressed their appreciation for Mr. Grant Weed.
The motion passed unanimously.
Proclamation recognizing Dr. Christopher Spitters for his service as Health Officer of the Snohomish Health E
District °
U
Mr. Frederick read aloud the proclamation. 'D
It was moved by Ms. Altamirano-Crosby and seconded by Ms. Elisabeth Crawford to approve the proclamation c
recognizing Dr. Christopher Spitters. -a
L
Board members expressed their appreciation for Dr. Christopher Spitters. o
The motion passed unanimously. m
Approval of Minutes
It was moved by Mr. Zarlingo and seconded by Ms. Masumoto-Wright to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of May 10, 2022, the special meeting of May 26, 2022, and the special meeting of May 31, 2022. The
motion passed unanimously.
Public Comment
There were no volunteers to speak during public comment. Public comment was closed.
Consent
It was moved by Ms. Jorstad and seconded by Mr. Neil Tibbott to approve the following items on consent:
a. Approve vouchers and Res. 22-15 authorizina Health District expenditures from April 16. 2022. to Ma
15, 2022
b. Authorize the Administrative Officer to sign the amendment to the master services agreement with the
North Sound Accountable Community of Health for participation in the collaborative action network
c. Authorize the Administrative Officer to sign the agreement with Ideal Option to provide sexually -
transmitted disease testing and treatment to Health District clients
d. Approve policy POL 100.001 concerning policies and procedures
e. Authorize the Administrative Officer to purchase vehicles within the allocated limits of the 2022 Adopted
Budget
The motion passed unanimously.
Action
Assignment agreement with Maxim Healthcare Services to provide temporary nursing support for the
tuberculosis program (SR 22-049; K. Curtis)
Ms. Katie Curtis shared that there are at least two nursing vacancies in the Prevention Services division and
the District has a very hard time recruiting for nurses because of private sector pay and bonuses. In the
District's tuberculosis program, there is one nurse position that will be able to start on September 1 and staff
would like to bring on a temporary nurse using Maxim to use in the interim.
It was moved by Ms. Jorstad and seconded by Ms. Logan to authorize the Administrative Officer to sign the
assignment agreement with Maxim Healthcare Services to provide temporary nursing support for the
tuberculosis program. The motion passed unanimously.
Health District Board of Health June 14, 2022 Minutes Packet Pg. 73
7
7.1.c
NU0
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
WWW.SNOHD.ORG
Administration Division
Res. 22-17 approving the 2021 budget amendment #3 (SR 22-050; S. Centanni)
Due to COVID activity, the Health District incurred an additional $960,000 of expenditures and revenue in the
FEMA category in 2021 and staff are prosing to increase the revenue and expenditures for 2021 $5 million to
not exceed the appropriations for financial year 2021.
It was moved by Mr. Zarlingo and seconded by Ms. Logan to approve Res. 22-17 approving the 2021 budget
amendment #3. The motion passed unanimously.
Res. 22-14 approving the 2022 budget amendment #1 (SR 22-043; S. Centanni)
The purpose of this budget amendment was to look at the revenues and expenditures for the year, now that we
have more information, as the budget was originally adopted at the end of 2021. As the District began
demobilizing COVID operations back in March and with the addition of FPHS funding, some adjustments were
needed.
It was moved by Ms. Jorstad and seconded by Ms. Altamirano-Crosby to approve Res. 22-14 approving the
2022 budaet amendment #1. The motion Dassed unanimously.
Briefings
Professional services agreement insurance waiver (SR 22-055; S. Frederick)
The Health District is working to contract with a project manager to work through the process of facilitating and
coordinating efforts related to the County's withdrawal from the Health District. The contractor has requested
that the District waive the insurance terms in the base contract and accept the insurances that he has agreed
to provide. The contractor has unique insight into the conversation related to the merger of the Health District
and the County, having done a similar study in 2016.
It was moved by Mr. Zarlingo and seconded by Ms. Logan that the sense of the Board is to register approval
with this proposal to waive the insurance requirement. The motion passed unanimously.
Administrative Officer's Report
The Department of Health made changes to the WAC related to previous exemptions in the permanent
plumbing code which had an impact to about 90 coffee shops throughout the county. Previously, this would
have required the stands to have permanent plumbing. This item was briefed at Board committee meetings
and since that time, there has been a lot of feedback given to the Department of Health, who has released a
document with their initial guidance. Operators of coffee stands that are not permanently plumbed may
continue with the normal permitting processes as they already exist without any changes. DOH is working on
putting together additional guidance to aid local health jurisdictions in updating local codes. The District will
send a communication out to the businesses that would have been affected by the WAC.
The June 8 vote by the County Council to withdraw from the Health District sets in motion the much larger work
in moving the process forward. There have been a lot of meetings to understand what this means and how to
operationalize the process.
The District is starting the budgeting process a bit earlier than normal. Invitations to a preliminary meeting of
the budget ad hoc committee have already been sent. This meeting is to receive initial direction from Board
members so staff have the ability to bring forward more comprehensive budget and ultimately shorten the
budget development process.
Health Officer's Report
COVID. Cases have been coming down gently over the last few weeks after peaking in mid to late May. The
rate has been around 220 per 100,000 over a seven day period and represents 1,850 cases reported last
week. Looking at case rates by zip code shows that waves tend to start in denser urban core locations
proximate to King County and then move north and east from there. The hospital census is holding steady at
0
Q.
a�
as
as
E
0
U
c
0
m
as
O
Health District Board of Health June 14, 2022 Minutes Packet Pg. 74
8
7.1.c
NV
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
WWW.SNOHD.ORG
Administration Division
about 50-55 staffed beds for COVID out of a total of 690. The healthcare system continues to be stressed by
staffing and supply chain issues. The county remains in the medium risk category and early indicators seem to
0.
indicate the beginning of a downward slope. Neither the recommendations nor the objectives for the
community have changed since the last Board of Health meeting.
Monkeypox. There are now 1,700 cases worldwide out of the endemic area in Central and Western Africa.
as
The United States has about 65 cases and Canada has had some cases, too. Washington has only had one
E
case which was in King County in a traveler that recently came back from an infected area. The concern for
0
this illness is twofold — one, the immediate human health impacts and would we ever cross a tipping point
where it can no longer be contained, and two, if it were to get established and go from a human to an animal,
then a reservoir of the infection in the wild would make it much harder if not impossible to eliminate on the
continent.
o
Avian Influenza. This virus starts primarily with wild birds, geese, and ducks, and then spreads to backyard
0
m
and commercial poultry farms. As a result of this about 40 million commercial poultry and 1,500 backyard
-°'a
flocks have been culled nationwide, with only one mild human case in the United States in March or April. That
case was mild, recovered uneventfully, and did not transmit to others.
o
Executive Session
The Snohomish Health District Board of Health will recess and convene into Executive Session for the
purposes of personnel matter pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) to evaluate qualifications of an applicant for
public employment, personnel matter pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) to review the performance of a public
employee, potential litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i), and to discuss with legal counsel risks of a
proposed action pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). Executive Session is expected to last up to 10 minutes.
Unless extended to a later time, the Board will reconvene into regular session at 4:27 p.m. and is expected to
take action. The Board of Health extended Executive Session 10 minutes, 10 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 5
minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes, 1 minute, 1
minute, 1 minute, and reconvened into regular session at 5:45 p.m. and took the following actions:
It was moved by Ms. Jorstad and seconded by Ms. Logan to approve the Board Chair to sign the employment
aareement as discussed in executive session. The motion passed unanimouslv.
It was moved by Ms. Jorstad and seconded by Ms. Logan to approve District staff to work on an ILA with the
County regarding the District acquisition. The motion passed unanimously.
Written Reports
Chair Wright noted that the following reports can be found in the Board packet:
a. Finance Manager's Report for February 2022 (SR 22-030; S. Centanni)
b. Program Policy Committee draft minutes — Apr 21
c. Administration Committee draft minutes — Apr 27
d. Executive Committee draft minutes — Apr 28
e. Public Health Advisory Council draft minutes — Apr 27
Information Items
Chair Wright announced upcoming meetings.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 5:49 p.m.
Health District Board of Health June 14, 2022 Minutes Packet Pg. 75
9
7.1.c
NU0
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
WWW.SNOHD.ORG
Stephanie Wright, Chair
Administration Division
Shawn Frederick, Administrative Officer / Secretary
Health District Board of Health June 14, 2022 Minutes Packet Pg. 76
10
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 19, 2022
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
E071922 Special
Packet Pg. 77
8.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
July 19, 2022
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Vivian Olson, Council President
Will Chen, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER
STAFF PRESENT
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
The Edmonds City Council special meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually.
2. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(I)
At 6:30 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced that the city council would meet in executive session to discuss
pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). Elected officials present at the executive session
were Mayor Nelson, and Councilmembers Tibbott, Buckshnis, Paine, Olson, L. Johnson, and Chen. City
Attorney Jeff Taraday was also present.
The executive session concluded at 6:59 p.m.
3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION: NO ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION
Mayor Nelson reconvened the special City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m.
ADJOURN
With no further business, the special council meeting was adjourned at 7:01 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 1
Packet Pg. 78
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Approval of Council Committee Minutes
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Recommendation
Approval of Council Committee Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
The Council committee meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
PSPHSP071222
FC071222
PPW071222
PSPHSP071822
Packet Pg. 79
8.2.a
PUBLIC SAFETY, PLANNING, HUMAN SERVICES, & PERSONNEL
COMMITTEE MEETING
July 12, 2022
Elected Officials Participating Virtually
Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair)
Councilmember Susan Paine
Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio)
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis
1. CALL TO ORDER
Staff Participating Virtually
Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director
Michelle Bennett, Police Chief
Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPHSP Committee meeting was called to order at 4:30
p.m. by Councilmember L. Johnson.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Administrative Services Job Descriptions
Mr. Turley explained there are four accounting specialist positions in administrative services, one that
does payroll, one that does accounts payable/receivable, and two that do utility billing; each have a job
description written specifically and uniquely for that job. The accounting skills are similar enough that
the job descriptions for the three positions could be combined into one which would assist with cross -
training and work coverage for one another. This proposal is acceptable to the union, the employees
and HR. Staff's recommendation is to combine the three job descriptions into one.
Discussion followed regarding support for the proposal, limiting siloing and providing backup when
needed.
Action: Consent Agenda
2. New Public Records Associate Position
Mr. Turley explained the City currently has one public records officer who handles all public records
requests other than for the police department who does their own. Public records requests have
increased dramatically in the last year and fulfilling them take a great deal of time especially when
information needs to be redacted. The proposed public records associate position, which would be two
pay ranges below the public records, would respond immediately to requests and handle simple
requests as well as provide vacation coverage and have opportunity for advancement. The packet
includes statistics regarding the increase in public records requests.
Discussion followed the growth in requests this year over last year, reasons for the increase in requests,
whether requests are made by the same people, redactions made by city attorney's office, public
records requests related to elected officials, opportunity for technology solutions, best practices for
electeds related to public records requests, legislative changes related to public records requests,
requests received for years' worth of emails, asking a requester for specificity, and restrictions against
requesting information for commercial purposes.
Packet Pg. 80
8.2.a
07/12/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 2
Mr. Turley clarified the request is for a new job description and an FTE. He anticipated the position
would be filled by approximately September; the position could be funded for the remaining four months
from salary savings due to other vacancies or via a budget amendment. Discussion continued regarding
financials not driving operations, a suggestion to add review of the position to the Finance Committee
agenda, and a preference to have this position go to full council.
Action: Full council
3. Public Records Specialist Position Request
Chief Bennett explained this position is related to public disclosure requests (PDR) specific to body
cameras. She provided statistics and lessons learned from the Seattle Police Department; all officers
were equipped with body cameras in 2017. At that time they had 8 public disclosure personnel, 2
litigation support analysts, and a full-time video specialist. Seattle now has 13 public disclosure
personnel, 2 litigation support analysts, 1 communication analyst and 3 video specialists and over 3.4
million videos in Evidence.com and have retained all video since the programs inception. She
anticipated Edmonds would purge video that is not of evidentiary value in 30-90 days.
Since Edmonds Police Department's pilot program began, it was discovered every 1 hour of video takes
6-10 hours to redact. Existing staff has been doing that work which has been difficult. The delay in
proceeding with a full body camera program is due in part to the need for these PDR positions. She
was hopeful that two positions would be enough to handle PDR specific to bodycams. This is a request
for a second position (one position was included in the budget); the job description is included in the
agenda packet. The original position was anticipated to be a commissioned person but it was
determined the disclosures could be handled by a non-commissioned person which is less expensive.
Staff's recommendation is to approve the job description and the budget request for a second position.
Questions and discussion followed regarding hazards mentioned in the job description, support for the
job description but concern with a request for second position, a suggestion to clarify the need for a
second position in the agenda memo, and efficiencies associated with posting and filling two positions
at the same time.
Action: Full Council with explanation regarding the need for a second position.
4. Police Cadet Position
Chief Bennett explained the budget for this position has already been approved. The job description
was updated using information from Lynnwood's cadet program and the pay range was also updated.
Discussion followed regarding support for this internship position and assistance this position will
provide to the police department.
Action: Consent Agenda
5. Public Information Officer Job Description Revision
Council President Olson explained the intent was to add clarity regarding the role of the public
information officer (PIO) which would be helpful to the person in the position as well as those the position
reports to. The draft update to the job description in the packet reflects the research of other cities done
by the council's executive assistant regarding the PIO job description as well as input from Interim
Director Merriman who supervised the position at the time and who had experience working with PIOs
in other cities. The job description was reviewed by Director Neill Hoyson and some changes were
made, primarily removing "neutral" due to the difficulty quantifying that aspect.
Packet Pg. 81
8.2.a
07/12/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 3
Questions and discussion followed regarding whether it was standard/accepted practice for the
legislative branch to attempt to censor/limit information coming from the executive branch, concern with
the legislative branch determining what was fact based, the role of the PIO, opinion pieces not within
the role of the PIO, enforcement, redundancy in the description, PIO job descriptions in other cities, lack
of a forum for the mayor to express their opinion, PIO as the City's mouthpiece and not opinion based,
concern with council overstep, preference for opinion pieces to come from the mayor and not from the
PIO, and concern this is person -based and not needs -based.
Action: Return to PSPHSP Committee next month.
6. Repeal of Safe Gun Storage and Related Laws after Washington Supreme Court's
Field Preemption Ruling
Due to the late hour, this item was not considered. Councilmember L. Johnson advised the committee
may have a special meeting to discuss this item.
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 5:31 p.m.
Packet Pg. 82
8.2.b
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
July 12, 2022
Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair) Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director
Councilmember Will Chen Michelle Bennett, Police Chief
Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online Finance Committee meeting was called to order at 5:32 p.m.
by Councilmember Buckshnis.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Position Conversions to 1.0 FTE for DV Coordinator and Parking Enforcement
Positions
Chief Bennett explained the parking enforcement officer is currently a .75 FTE and the request is to
increase it to 1.0 FTE. The domestic violence coordinator is currently a .5 FTE and the request is to
increase it to 1.0 FTE. The reason for the request is realistic staffing levels and it is much easier to fill
a full-time position. The City has not had a parking enforcement position for a year; revenues are
down and parking complaints continue to arise throughout the City. There is a large gap in services
available to victims of domestic violence and for victim advocacy. Domestic violence incidents range
up to 400 year which includes some unhoused individuals which the social worker and domestic
violence advocate can collaborate on.
Questions and discussion followed regarding whether the domestic violence coordinator should be a
social worker, differences between a domestic violence advocate and a social worker, whether
domestic violence cases increased during the pandemic, importance of the domestic violence
advocacy's work, and the domestic violence advocate collaborating with the social worker.
Action: Domestic violence coordinator - full council; parking enforcement — consent agenda
Discussion followed regarding staffing for the community storefront on Highway 99, safety
improvements at the storefront, future budget request to staff the storefront with an officer, bike
officers who plan to patrol near the storefront, and increased police presence on Highway 99.
2. Business Improvement District - Collections Update
Collections
Questions and discussion followed regarding sending out the delinquency letter, whether writing off
debt from closed businesses was a gift of public funds, and pursuing delinquent dues from active
businesses.
The City Charging the BID
Mr. Turley described staff's activities in support of the BID.
N
N
N
0
U
U_
r
c
as
E
a
Packet Pg. 83
8.2.b
07/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
Pam Stuller, BID, pointed out the BID's budget assumption did not include a charge from the City and
she urged committee members to consider the value of BID to the City.
Discussion followed regarding whether dues could be increased to cover administrative fees, the
process for increasing dues, and the council assistant researching amounts charged by other cities.
12% Delinquency Fee
Discussion included the amount of the fees, collection rate, serial non -payers, delaying collection
during 2020, and waiving delinquent fees in 2020,
Collection Agency
Discussion included that a collection agency was not an effective method for businesses, small
amount are not worth the collection agency's time, and changing the policy regarding the threshold
amount to send to a collection agency.
Action: Staff send delinquency letter now and further discussion by the task force
3. 2020 Audit Follow-up Actions
Mr. Turley explained in 2020 the City distributed over $1 million in small grants to businesses and
individuals in Edmonds, federal CARES funds provided via the Department of Commerce in
accordance with eligibility criteria that was reviewed and adopted by Council. The auditor's office
audited the grant distribution process and questioned 109 grants totaling $871,500. Staff reviewed the
grants and made a judgment that out of the 109, 33 (totaling $268,500) did not qualify. Staff
recommends sending a strongly worded letter stating they did not qualify for the grant and asking
them to return the money. All the grants were $10,000 or less, most were approximately $2,000. After
the letter is sent, the results will be evaluated and a decision made regarding how to proceed; options
include doing nothing (not staff's intent), civil court, or criminal court.
Questions and discussion followed regarding the auditor's identification of 109 businesses/individuals a
who did not qualify, how the auditor's list was narrowed to 33, whether businesses should be required g
to be located in Edmonds, providing follow-up to the auditor, potential audit question about distribution N
of ARPA funds in 2021, and staffing issues associated with sending out the letters.
r-
0
Action: Send letter to 33 businesses/individuals U_
r
c
4. ERP Update E
Mr. Turley relayed staff is currently implementing the OpenGov budget module which is separate from Q
an ERP (the entire financial system). The City hired a consultant as a project manager to research
ERP examples and provide a report and recommendation.
Questions and discussion followed regarding staffing issues that may affect selection and
implementation of the ERP system, research the consultant is doing, whether to delay pursuit of an
ERP, end date for support of the Eden financial system, time it will take to implement a new financial
system, whether the 2023 budget will utilize OpenGov, timeline for implementing OpenGov, and how
financial information is input into OpenGov.
Action: Staff continue to provide updates at finance committee meetings
5. May 2022 Monthly Financial Report
Mr. Turley reviewed:
Packet Pg. 84
8.2.b
07/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
• Noteworthy items:
o REET revenues are down $405,510 from this time last year, but only $42,632 under
budget.
o Sales Tax is up $561,209 from this time last year.
o Gas Utility Tax is up $56,776 from this point in time last year (colder than usual spring).
o Parks & Recreation Program Fees are up $136,020 from this point in time last year.
o Interfund Reimbursement — Contract Services — January through May of 2022 Engineering
Overhead has not yet been recorded; we are waiting on this from Engineering. January
through May of 2021 was a total of $905,601.
o Traffic Infraction Penalties are down $(60,448) from this point in time last year (vacancy in
the enforcement officer position).
• Sales Tax Revenues for 5 months ended May 31 - $561,000 ahead of last year, and $590,000
ahead of budget
• Sales Tax Revenues for 12 months ended May 31 by category
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: May 2022
Year -to -Date
Total $4,483,349
Anlau a Repa, Ararsxne¢r &
$s"317
1 Pxcreaiio¢. $29916
Cnnsmrcii' Tsaae_
Health R
EW'.508
Peno¢al Care.
Bususess 9ercices.
A.—cudAS-
S119.935
ME&
Cxso�nre_ $13.u13
SI5,495
.!Wu F.4 Sraies.
and1AbSI
41a9 ie7
b
fomn¢ticacions_
mi" Actnd. -
S1W_l6
Muck sak Tmm e.
$1524�
J
07ras'.$73,3�0
Man¢hchviag. SS??W
• Real Estate Excise Tax Revenues for 5 months ended May 31 - Under budget by $43,000
(97.3%)
• Preliminary results are in for last year: The General Fund's ending fund balance at 12/31/2021
s $1 b,Y31,3bJ, the Uty"s largest ever.
Edmonds - General F u nd, Budget and Actual for 2021
Final Budget
Revenues $ 42,197,229
Expenses (45,353,097)
Revenues over(under) Expenses (3,165,368)
Net Transters(Out( (529,332)
Net Change in Fund Balance (3,695,2on)
Fund Balance, 1/1/2021 13,868,745
Fund Balance, 12/31/2021 $ 10,173,545
Actual Results
Vari ce from
Budget
$ 43,697,155
(41,365,223)
$ 1,509,926
3,997,374
2,331,932
(269,323)
5,497,800
260,009
2,062,(i09
13,868,745
5,757,809
$ 15,931,354
$ 5,757,809
Per Preliminary Annual Report, NOT incl, GF Sub Funds
• Preliminary results are in for last year - City-wide Budget compared to Actual Results
Ecmands -Pre I irninarV City -Wide Results, Budget anc Actual for 2021
Final Budget
Revanues $ 120.220,616
Expenses 435,015,309)
Revenues over under' Expenses (14.734,693i
Fund Balance, 1/112021 137,198,098
Fund Balance, 12131 r2P21 $ 122,463,405
Actual Results
Variance from
Budge-
$ 124,475,732
(113,490,582)
$ 4, 1S5, 116
21,524727
10,985,150
137,198,098
25,719,843
-
$ 148,183,248
$ 25,719,843
Per Preliminary December Morthly Report
Packet Pg. 85
8.2.b
07/12/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 4
With $ 16 million of fund balance in the General Fund alone, the city remains in a very strong
position financially.
o General Fund, Fund 001, Restricted fund balance - $7,493,332
o General Fund, Fund 001, Unrestricted fund balance - $$8,438,022
o Contingency Fund 012, restricted - $1,768,863
Questions and discussion followed regarding where bond funds are recorded and staff vacancies.
Action: Received for Filing agenda item
6. Miscellaneous
Discussion followed regarding requests for additional position
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 7:23 p.m.
s
N
N
N
O
U
U-
r
c
m
E
t
tv
.r
a
Packet Pg. 86
8.2.c
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
July 12, 2022
Elected Officials Participating Virtually
Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair)
Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio)
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis
CALL TO ORDER
Staff Participating Virtually
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural Arts & Human
Serv. Dir.
Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec. & Cultural Arts &
Human Serv. Dir.
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PPW Committee meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by
Councilmember Tibbott.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
Oktoberfest Event Agreement
Ms. Burley explained this is a special event agreement with the Rotary to host Oktoberfest which was
cancelled twice due to Covid. Oktoberfest is a two-day festival in September at the Frances Anderson
Center as well as a 5k. The Rotary is partnering with a professional event management company to
host the event who has been fabulous to work with. This is a free event; proceeds benefit nonprofits in
the community. The contract has been reviewed by all City departments and the city attorney.
Questions and discussion followed regarding a suggestion to have contracts between the City and
Chamber of Commerce for Halloween and the tree lighting instead of special events permits, parking
for the event, events moving back to Civic Park once it is completed, ADA parking, and potentially using
streatery fees to provide additional parking.
Action: Consent Agenda.
2. City of Lynnwood/Meadowdale Park ILA 2022 Expenditure Request
Ms. Feser recalled this was presented to the PPW Committee last month who recommended a
presentation to full council. As there was insufficient time at the council meeting for the presentation, it
was referred back to committee for further discussion. She introduced Lynn Sordel, City of Lynnwood
Parks Director.
Ms. Feser reviewed the Meadowdale Playfields Park Playground Project Funding Request:
• Map with the location of the Meadowdale Playfields Park, Edmonds and Lynnwood city limits,
Meadowdale Middle School and Meadowdale Elementary
• Aerial identifying Meadowdale Playfields Park (3 softball fields, 2 multipurpose fields, parking lot
and existing playground), Meadowdale Elementary (2 small playgrounds on opposite side of
building from the park) and Meadowdale Middle School (no playground)
• Facility Agreement History
Date
Agreement/Jurisdiction
Purpose
Expiration
1985
Development/Operations Agreement
o Development of adopted 1985 Master
Plan
2025
City of Lynnwood
Packet Pg. 87
8.2.c
07/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2
City of Edmonds
Snohomish County
Edmonds School District
2012
Interlocal Agreement ILA Extension
o Extend Lynnwood's use by 40 years
2065
City of Lynnwood
o Lynnwood additional use IF Edmonds
Edmonds School District
ceases use (2025 renewal)
o Establish cost sharing between COL —
ESD future redevelopment
2017
Interlocal Agreement (ILA)
o Meadowdale Playfields Redevelopment
2025
City of Lynnwood
Project — athletic fields (5), fencing and
City of Edmonds
path ($5.15M)
Edmonds School District
• 2017 Playfield Redevelopment Project
o $2,597,155
City of Lynnwood
o $1,000,000
Edmonds School District (property owner
o $750,000
RCO local parks and YAF
o $500,000*
City of Edmonds
o $300,000
Snohomish Count
o $5,147,155
Total cost estimate
*City of Edmonds funded backstops, safety netting and fencing, walkways and ADA
improvements of the 5 athletic fields
Inclusive Playground project costs - $507,077, City of L nnwood requesting 50%
Existing Project Sources
Yost Pool Re faster Project savings
$94,500
Greenhouse Replacement Recollection
Goffette donation can cover this expenditure)
$50,000
Civic Park Stormwater Mitigation Project*
if ARPA funding is allocated to cover this expenditure)
$104,038
Funding total
$248,538
*If the council chooses not to cover the $104,038 balance with this proposed allocation, then the
funding would need to come from another source outside of the Parks Capital program such as
the General Fund
Ms. Feser relayed the request is council consideration of City of Lynnwood's request for 50% funding
costs of the Meadowdale Playfields Park Playground project
Mr. Sordel commented on the importance of the City of Lynnwood's relationship with Edmonds, future
renegotiation of the ILA, meetings Lynnwood has had with Edmonds since 2017 regarding this project,
Lynnwood's interest in remaining equal partners with Edmonds, importance of the facility to both
communities, outreach to the community, the school district's contribution to the fields, and replacement
of the 40 year old playground equipment is a maintenance and operational issue.
Questions and discussion followed regarding importance of partnering with Lynnwood, the definition of
maintenance and operations, concern with investing in a school district property when the school district
is not contributing, changes to the proposed playground replacement to make it inclusive, another ADA
playground in Edmonds near this location, public feedback regarding accessibility, concern Edmonds
was not involved in the design of the playground, funds in the PROS Plan capital program for this
project, the inclusive playground in Civic Park, and concern the cost of the playground upgrade should
be shared between Lynnwood, Edmonds and the Edmonds School District.
Questions and discussion continued regarding requesting funding from Snohomish County, parties in
the 2017 ILA, maintaining a relationship with Lynnwood, whether the playground would be upgraded
without Edmonds' participation, future investment to replace field turf, collaborating on projects and
funding, identifying projects over the next 6-10 years for this park and how the three partners will
Packet Pg. 88
8.2.c
07/12/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3
contribute to those, terms in the ILA to move Edmonds' use to other fields, data indicating the
importance of this park to the Edmonds community, Lynnwood's commitment to partnering with
Edmonds, and the level of urgency to replace the playground equipment.
The committee recommended further discussion between Ms. Feser and Mr. Sordel regarding
negotiating the ILA and funding for the playground project.
Action: Full council
3. Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Department - Q2 Report
Action: Information only
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
Packet Pg. 89
8.2.d
PUBLIC SAFETY, PLANNING, HUMAN SERVICES & PERSONNEL
COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING
July 18, 2022
Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually
Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair) Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Councilmember Susan Paine Scott Passey, City Clerk
Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio)
CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPHSP Committee meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m.
by Councilmember L. Johnson.
Councilmember L. Johnson acknowledged the passing of Councilmember K. Johnson She served the
City of Edmonds with admirable passion and dedication and she will be missed by many.
Councilmember Paine said she has known Councilmember K. Johnson for 15 years. She had a passion
for the arts and she appreciated her love of the environment and advocating for planting native species.
She loved Edmonds and loved serving Edmonds. She had a great knowledge and understanding of
planning and transportation. Her passing was terribly unexpected and she will be missed.
Council President Olson said she was not prepared to make a statement.
2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Repeal of Safe Gun Storage and Related Laws After Washington Supreme Court's
Field Preemption Ruling
Mr. Taraday explained this ordinance was the subject of litigation brought against the City on the
grounds that the ordinance was preempted by state law. That lawsuit went from Superior Court to the
Court of Appeals and ultimately to the Supreme Court where the lawsuit was conclusively ruled upon
as preempted by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court issued a ruling and mandate, the document
that states the Supreme Court is done reviewing the Superior Court's decision and the Superior Court's
decision stands. The Superior Court issued an injunction (entered by the court in October 2019 and
subject to review for the last couple years) stated, "Upon final mandate, if the City does not prevail or
does not appeal this order, this section must be repealed." The section referenced is 5.26.020
specifically. At this point there is effectively a court order demanding that the City repeal at least
5.26.020.
Mr. Taraday explained the ordinance he prepared recognizing the Supreme Court ruling repeals in their
entirety Ordinances 4120, 4121 and 4131. Ordinance 4121 was not the subject of the Court's decision,
so technically the City is not under a court order requiring the repeal of Ordinance 4121. However,
Ordinance 4121 refers to Ordinance 4120 so retaining it would create a dead-end in the code.
Questions and discussion followed regarding who initiated this action; the city attorney's opinion that
this action needs to be taken; dismay Edmonds' hands are tied by a state preemption; historic levels of
mass shootings; the skyrocketing health crisis of shootings; information from the Be Smart secure
firearm program about the importance of secure storage to protect children, the rise in unintentional
shootings, increased rate of gun suicide among children in 2020 ages 17 and under, and firearms as
the leading cause of death in children in the United States; the choice to own a weapon comes with the
Packet Pg. 90
8.2.d
07/18/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 2
responsibility to store it securely; pride in the stance the City took to raise awareness and show that
Edmonds takes prevention of gun violence seriously; the executive department's response to partner
with Be Smart; what the City is mandated to do or not do; Seattle's ordinance that is still in court;
preference to have Edmonds take gun violence prevention seriously and determine what else can be
done; support for education and increased advocacy; how the legislative branch can support the
executive branch; preference to do more than repeal the ordinance; and support for this going to a work
group to answer questions about what else can be done before bringing it to council.
Mr. Taraday said while it is true the judge's original injunction only targeted a particular section of
chapter 5.26, it is very clear from the Supreme Court's decision there is no aspect of firearm regulation
that is left to the cities; the state has preempted the entire field and until the state legislature changes
that law, there is nothing left for cities to regulate in the realm of firearms and therefore, there is nothing
to do regulation -wise at the city level. That does not mean the City cannot spend money educating gun
owners on safety or adopt resolution asking the legislature to repeal the statute that preempts the field.
There is no reason for the ordinances to remain when the State Supreme Court has it make it very clear
there is nothing left to regulate at the city level.
Questions and discussion continued regarding forming a taskforce to develop next steps for increasing
safety, raising awareness and looking at ways to create improve safety such as handing out gun locks,
working with the community to create an educational campaign to provide better access to safe gun
storage solutions, advocating for a safe community, focusing on things that are within the realm of the
city council, the City's involvement in the Be Smart program, preference to proceed with the repeal,
concern repealing the ordinances without doing anything else such as a resolution is empty handed,
support for adopting a resolution outlining what the council resolves to do at the same time the
ordinances are repealed, residents' disappointment with the ruling, and whether delaying the repeal to
create a resolution and take steps to increase advocacy, education and awareness creates any risk.
Discussion and questions continued regarding no legal requirement that the repeal occur at the same
time as follow-on action to bolster gun safety; when the mandate was issued (May 13, 2022); support
for a resolution with recommendations for the legislature, city council and community; supporting efforts
of the Be Smart program; residents' disappointment when the city council acted contrary to state law
as well as with the city council's involvement in state and national issues; preference for the city council
to focus on municipal issues; scheduling an agenda item to discuss what residents want the council to
spend its time on; concern with downplaying gun violence; the recent addition of an extreme risk
protection order to the City's code; and addressing gaps in the code before repealing the ordinance(s).
Committee recommendation: Full council on July 26th with the intent of reviewing a resolution at the
same time.
Council President Olson advised she will schedule repeal of the ordinances on the July 26th if time
allows, but she will not schedule a resolution until the more global issue related to council resolutions
is addressed.
2. Public Information Officer Job Description Revision
Council President Olson advised in response to concern at last week's committee meeting whether this
was in the city council's purview, she provided RCW 35a.11.020 which states the content of job
descriptions is within the council's purview. The proposed changes to the job description were due to
the need for guardrails on the job description and making it clear communications by the PIO were the
voice of the entire City and not opinion pieces. To support the concept that this is not personal, she
referred to a media release that was not a neutral voice that was not done by the current PIO.
Questions and discussion followed regarding other cities' PIO job description, cities with a strong mayor
versus mayor/city manager form of government, a suggestion to replace "and be accountable for the
Packet Pg. 91
8.2.d
07/18/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 3
accuracy of information released" (page 3 of job description) with "when working with an elected
official(s), the elected official is accountable for the accuracy and the content of the information
released," a suggestion to remove "or distribution" (page 3 of job description), support a PIO can provide
electeds, only 5 press releases since 2016 that fall into the category of opinion, preference for
discussion at full council, who the PIO reports to in other cities, concern none of the other job
descriptions exert this amount control from the legislative branch, concern this is the third time this job
description has been discussed by council in the last year, concern this is targeting information coming
from the mayor's office, concern with using an employee to get at the mayor, who determines if
information is opinion -based or fact -based, and concern this is overstep by the legislative branch.
Questions and discussion continued regarding concern with manipulating a city employee, other cities'
job descriptions that hold the PIO responsible for fact -based and mention neutrality, HR's direction to
remove reference to neutrality as it is intangible, HR's approval of the proposed job description, 6 press
releases since 2020 that were opinion -based, concern a release regarding the PROS Plan was no
longer on the City's website, guardrails to provide clarity between electeds and PIO, other avenues to
address the issue, job descriptions within the council's purview, whether the form of effects the PIO's
job description, the PIO is the voice of the City as a whole not the mayor or city manager, whether this
is best practice, whether there are unintended consequences, concern with council overstep into
administration and the employee's ability to do their job and feel secure, and the PIO being stuck
between the administration and council.
Questions and discussion continued regarding working with HR to come up with best practices, intent
of the administrative order on bullying to protect employees, finding other guardrails to protect staff, a
suggestion to remove, "this position expressly does not provide support in preparation or distribution of
opinion -based commentary of personal views" and work with HR on alternate language, putting the
responsibility for accuracy on the elected who provides the information, concern with how the council
may intend to use this, the council's job to set policy, concern the policy is not clear enough to prevent
the mayor from putting an employee in a position of violating policy, concern with addressing a policy
issue via a job description, the committee's disagreement with the proposed job description, reason the
job description was rescheduled to this meeting, and best practices for a PIO.
Committee recommendation: Full council.
3. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 3:27 p.m.
Packet Pg. 92
8.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 19, 2022
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
E071922
Packet Pg. 93
8.3.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
July 19, 2022
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Vivian Olson, Council President
Will Chen, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director
Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director
Kernen Lien, Planning Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Buckshnis read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the
original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We
respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection
with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER, STRIKING ITEMS 9.3, POSITION
CONVERSION TO 1.0 FTE FOR DV COORDINATOR POSITION, 9.4, PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
SPECIALIST POSITION REQUEST, AND 9.5, NEW PUBLIC RECORDS ASSOCIATE
POSITION, AT THE REQUEST OF STAFF, AND CHANGING COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEM 9.6,
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT (OPMA) TRAINING (PART 2), TO ITEM 9.3. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson described procedures for in -person audience comments.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 1
Packet Pg. 94
N
N
CD
T
0
w
c
m
E
0
2
Q
8.3.a
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, offered condolences to all who have served with Councilmember K. Johnson,
recognizing how valuable she was to the City and to the community. She referred to comments the public
has made about how Councilmember K. Johnson listened, recalling during the last election she
complimented her hair in her campaign materials; the next day Councilmember K. Johnson showed up
with a new hairdo. Next, Ms. Longstaff invited the public to the Walk Back in Time at the Edmonds
Memorial Cemetery on Thursday, July 21 from 1:00-2:00 p.m. which will recognize pioneers buried in
the cemetery.
Marjie Fields, Edmonds, was saddened by the passing of Councilmember K. Johnson, commenting she
will be missed. She referred to the Waterfront Study which makes many important points, primarily
points that were already known such as the change made long ago regarding plans for the state ferry's use
of the Unocal property adjacent to the marsh. The land use comprehensive plan element emphasizes goals
for open space, especially in areas such as the Edmonds Marsh. The study emphasizes the importance of
rezoning the Unocal property to open space, extending the City's right of first purchase until cleanup
makes the purchase possible as well as the importance of public process for decisions. While she strongly
supports a public process, public input needs to be informed input; public education is needed regarding
environmental issues such as salmon habitat, climate change mitigation and expected sea level rise. The
report also points out a missing piece, City affirmation of intent to rehabilitate the marsh into a
functioning estuary. This omission is a major obstacle for moving forward. All the items in the report are
already known and she questioned why the City continues to fund plans and studies instead of moving
ahead with action on the information. She relayed a quote, planning should be preparation for action, not
a substitute. One new item in the report, after extensive praise for the value of beaches that attract visitors
from near and far, the consultant suggested there should be a hotel and recommended a hotel feasibility
study. She questioned the idea of someone making money by commercializing the valuable beaches and
why the City would fund such a study as it would benefit developers. She strongly recommended that
idea be discarded and move ahead with other ideas.
Kathleen Sears, Edmonds, commented with the passing of Councilmember K. Johnson, the community c
has lost a hardworking, dedicated citizens and the Edmonds Marsh has lost a stalworth champion. a
Councilmember K. Johnson was a year behind her at Edmonds High School and they shared a lifelong a
love of the Edmonds Marsh. She was grateful to Councilmember K. Johnson for all she has done to N
protect the marsh and hoped the council would carry that important work forward. This morning, she oN,
checked in people for the marsh work party; over the past four days, 35 people ranging in age from 16 to c
early 70s wrestled blackberries, balanced precariously on pallets to remove noxious nightshade, and w
donned waders to cut and haul out sections of an old chain link fence. If there is any doubt that the people
of Edmonds love the marsh, she suggested observing the next work party would dispel those doubts. She
referred to a My Edmonds News article about the City's open house last October on the 2024
comprehensive plan update focused on waterfront issues where 75% of attendees rated marsh restoration
as a 4 or 5 on a 1-5 scale. People in Edmonds care about restoring the marsh. The recently adopted PROS a
Plan included strong recommendations to expand the Edmonds Marsh estuary to include the Unocal
property, develop a funding strategy for purchase of the Unocal property, etc. She urged the City to
include this same strong wording in the updated comprehensive plan so the City can obtain necessary
grant funds. She applauded the City for including a gap analysis for equity as part of the update process;
equity and the environment are not in conflict and she urged the council to reject that false dichotomy. A
thriving city needs both equity and a flourishing environment. The funding sources for equity projects
such as improving Edmonds' access to Lake Ballinger or adding parks and open spaces in underserved
areas are separate from the ample funding sources for salmon recovery; the City can do both.
Jay Grant, Port of Edmonds commissioner and liaison to the city council, commented a lot of people will
miss Councilmember K. Johnson, but the community will miss her voice. As he got to know her over the
past few years, there were a few times he did not agree with her votes but knew her well enough to talk to
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 2
Packet Pg. 95
8.3.a
her about it. With the knowledge and experience she had as a professional planner, she was an advocate
for Edmonds residents. When discussing her vote, she used her knowledge and experience to benefit the
citizens. Next, Commissioner Grant advised the Port will look at the Waterfront Issues Study. The Port
has many stakeholders including BNSF, private land owners, and Washington State Ferries so it is not as
simple as it may seem. There are a lot of issues to consider including rising tides, development, the marsh,
etc. that the City and the Port need to work together on.
Linda Fireman, Edmonds, commented Councilmember K. Johnson was a friend to many and so
important to Edmonds and she and all Edmonds residents will miss her. Next, regarding the BD2
Designated Street Front Interim Ordinance 4262, she encouraged the council to vote yes to move it
forward. Edmonds has a small business district and the small businesses are needed and the issue should
not be just thrown aside for more apartments and developers' ideas.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, paid his respects to Councilmember K. Johnson, commenting she loved Edmonds
and worked really hard to support her constituents and will be greatly missed; it's a sad day for Edmonds.
He referred to Resolution 1271 regarding marriage equality and Resolution 1498 regarding access to a
full range of reproductive rights. Jeff Taraday was the city attorney when both resolutions were passed
but they are very different. Resolution 1271 was signed by the four councilmembers who supported the
resolution and not the mayor; Resolution 1498 is signed by the mayor and not any of the councilmembers
who supported it. Resolution 1271 added the issue to the council's legislative agenda which is pretty
important; Resolution 1498 did not. Resolution 1271 did not adopt any policies as it is a resolution;
Resolution 1498 attempts to adopt policy. Resolution 1271 was consistent with what the United States
Supreme Court said; Resolution 1498 calls for amendments to constitutions that councilmembers took an —
oath to support. Resolution 1271 makes no mention of supporting people coming from other states to 3
Edmonds, no mention of not cooperating or assisting whatsoever with any out-of-state law enforcement G
agency, public entity or private party. In expressing support for Resolution 1271, then-Councilmember c
Michael Plunkett stated rights come from nature and the god of nature; Plunkett stated most governments
cc
oppress or take rights, that in the western culture, government supports human rights. The July 28, 2022 c
city council meeting minutes document that Councilmember Tibbott said he would like to have a whereas a
clause added that the unborn also have rights. Councilmember Tibbott was absent on July 5, 2022 and his a
request was not honored. Years after Resolution 1271 was passed, city council adopted Resolution 1381 N
which was supposed to ensure Edmonds remains a welcoming, inclusive and safe community for all who CD
live, work and visit Edmonds. The 2022 city council will now have to consider repealing or amending c
Resolution 1381 to exclude preborn life and citizens who are pro -life. He suggested it would be preferable w
to repeal Resolution 1498 and keep Resolution 1381 as is and urged the council to do so.
m
E
Steve Brogs spoke regarding Sunset Avenue, what he calls Blackberry Avenue, commenting the water is
not visible in many places due to the blackberries. He was told Councilmember Buckshnis and Council
President Olson are the best ones to talk to as they get things done. He thought about cutting the a
blackberries himself but friends said that was up to Burlington Northern. He suggested the City get BNSF
to cut the blackberries on Sunset Avenue.
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Edmonds, said she and Councilmember K. Johnson started their friendship
in about 2007 with her appointment to the Edmonds Transportation Committee; Kristiana was the chair
and transportation issues was where she truly shined. She nicknamed Councilmember K. Johnson "KJ" as
she saw a sense of coolness about her; she never seemed like a Kristiana and she enjoyed being called KJ.
Over their long friendship, they enjoyed many things including meals out, reminiscing about riding their
horses around Edmonds as children, attending political cultural events and her son Dominic who was a
favorite of hers as she had no children. She had a fabulous sense of humor and was very generous to all
that mattered and was always willing to engage the people around her, especially people who were
socially awkward, wanting them to understand they belonged. She loved her family, especially her sister
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 3
Packet Pg. 96
8.3.a
Janette Johnson who she was very close to. As most sisters agree, relationship aren't always easy. She
was proud of her father, but particularly proud of her mother who served as the district republican chair of
the area and was involved in the League of Women Voters. Family meant everything to her. KJ became
ill with long term issues about 3-4 years ago; she spoke with her about giving up her council position to
focus on her health. KJ knew she would eventually resign but would know when. KJ faced a number of
serious medical issues bravely and with determination.
Ms. Fraley-Monillas said she spent much time with KJ in hospitals and in her home assisting her when
possible. Their close relationship fell apart about two years ago with the political divide that hit the small
town of Edmonds and the electeds. She was most sad about the amount of time KJ spent in healthcare
facilities and hospitals over the past 2-3 years. She privately suggested she not run again and spend time
enjoying hobbies, art, poetry, family, friends and resting for her health. KJ told her that her physician
suggested the pace and stress of the council would be difficult for her recovery and recommend she
resign. Unfortunately, this past election season she was encouraged to run again by some on council and
some Edmonds citizens in order to have the votes needed to pass the political agenda. She believed this
was too much for her to overcome. She wished people would have thought of Kristiana first and
encouraged her to take care of herself and enjoy life. In the end, KJ made the decision she wanted and
remained in the fast, high -paced environment until the end. She hoped she was finally able to rest in
peace, saying adios for now my friend.
Jenna Nand, Edmonds, relayed her sadness at the passing of Councilmember K. Johnson. As someone
who frequently attends council meetings, she recalled Councilmember K. Johnson was never scared to
confront anyone, whether a consultant or expert, whenever she and probably most people in the room did not understand what they were talking about and forcing them to put things in terms that a majority of 3
citizens could understand. That is a very valuable skill that will be lost without her as a councilmember. G
As a citizen activist, she will miss Councilmember K. Johnson's presence on the council. Next, regarding c
the updates and improvements in the Highway 99 corridor which she commended the council for @
undertaking, she relayed there have been close to 1,000 deaths in the UK related to the heat wave, c
reminiscent to what happened in the Pacific NW last year when hundreds died because the infrastructure, a
social services and society were completely unprepared for such a weather event. Although that may not a
be at top of mind this year due to the milder summer, she hoped the planning related to the Highway 99 N
cm
improvement project included building heat shelters, access to water, places to sit, shade and some sort of CD
compassionate accommodate for the unhoused population who are the most vulnerable during heat waves c
to heat stroke and death. w
c
Mayor Nelson described the procedures for virtual audience comments.
Greg Ferguson, Edmonds, said council should not accept the Waterfront Study as drafted and should
return it for revisions such as the study recommendations 3A-F related to waiting until the 2024 a
comprehensive plan update to formally recognize that the ferry terminal will not be moved to the marsh.
That is too late; the timeline is clearly laid out in the memo and the Unocal property could come up for
sale as early as December 2023. Identification of outside natural resource agency funding and restoration
partners will be a long process that needs to begin much sooner. These efforts are impeded by city
planning documents that include a ferry terminal at the marsh. Salmon recovery grants will not fund a
place to park cars and big boats. Next, the study recognizes rising sea levels but little attention is paid to
what needs to be done about it, whether there will be a giant seawall built along the waterfront, buildings
moved inland, and what happens to the beaches. A waterfront study should include a discussion of
alternatives to address the most significant threat and the process used to make critical decisions about its
future. He urged the council to recommend the study be revised to address these issues. He wished
Councilmember K. Johnson rest in peace.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 4
Packet Pg. 97
8.3.a
Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, said her heart and prayers are with everyone in the loss of
Councilmember K. Johnson. She always felt more informed by staff s answers to her insightful questions
during meetings and she was thankful for her dedication to the community as well the time and effort that
each councilmember gives to the community. Next, with regard to the tree ordinance, she said the right to
own and use one's property is the guardian of every other right. Owners of vacant and developed property
have equal rights protected by the U.S. constitution. Trees, the rights to them, and the land beneath them
belong to the owner whose land they grow on. Edmonds denies constitutional protections to owners of
vacant property that all U.S. citizens benefit from. Edmonds is using land use laws, excessive fees and
property rights seizures to restrict or eliminate development they don't like, limiting the responsible use
of property and unbelievably charging residents for the worth of their own property, their trees, plus tree
replacement fees of $2500 per tree unplanted, 1-3 trees required for each tree removed for homes. Under
the unconstitutional conditions doctrine, government may not deny benefit to a person because they
exercise their constitutional rights. The doctrine vindicates the constitution's rights by preventing
government from coercing people into giving them up as a requirement for permits.
Ms. Ferkingstad continued, the tree ordinance enables the City to take possession of land owners' trees
and has meaningfully interfered with land owners' possession and control over their trees. This is an
unreasonable seizure of property under the 4' Amendment and the excessive fine in violation of the 8'
and 14' Amendments. Fewer developments means fewer housing options and limiting housing options
means urban sprawl, less economic growth and less vitality. The protections written within the
constitution cannot be thrown away by a city's ordinance and it is important to retain the freedoms and
rights to private property protected by the constitution. She believed the original intent of the tree
ordinance was to avoid clear cutting and encourage more trees to be planted, not to restrict and
unnecessarily raise the cost of needed homes. She questioned whether anyone would honor the pledge
made at every meeting, liberty and justice for all. This is an emergency for her and many Edmonds
families. She requested the council remove the illegal elements from the tree ordinance.
6. RECEIVED FOR FILING
1. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM STEPHEN SCHROEDER Q
N
2. MAY 2022 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT cm
T
3. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS w
7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
E
t
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda Q
items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 5, 2022
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 5, 2022
3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL COMMITTEE MINUTES
4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS
5. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES JOB DESCRIPTIONS
6. UPDATE TO PERSONNEL POLICY 3.10 JOB ASSIGNMENTS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 5
Packet Pg. 98
7. POLICE CADET POSITION
8. PARKING ENFORCEMENT POSITION
9. OKTOBERFEST SPECIAL EVENT AGREEMENT
8. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING BD2 DESIGNATED STREET FRONT INTERIM ORDINANCE NO.
4262
Planning Manager Kernen Lien reviewed:
• Recap
o Multifamily Building Permit Moratorium Ord. 4247 adopted to address insufficient design
standards for multifamily only building in the BD2 zone
o Extended three times —Ordinances 4253, 4254, and 4255
o Interim Design Standards adopted April 29' with Ordinance 4256
o Led to discussions regarding BD allowed uses and Designated Street Front
o Council indicated a desire to explore expanding the Designated Street Front resulting in the
adoption of Interim Ordinance 4262
• Interim Ordinance 4262 — Section 1: Map 16.43-1
� Onsgnalnrl S1r¢ot From
was
� r = onLer sr
r
? i
s
v fs n
• R:
J ' Y BELL Si
, - L JD2
wrr❑ .,
n
ALVERW
ALDER Si "-
WA.qur IT - WAL—T 71
1
11:
o Councilmembers and residents voiced interest to have commercial office to support retail
core
o Legislative history favored pedestrian activity and commercial uses on both sides of the street
as part of the original designation
• Interim Ordinance 4262: Section 2 Table 16.43-1
o Clarifies ambiguities
o Fill in blanks in uses created by Ordinance 3955
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 6
Packet Pg. 99
Q
8.3.a
o Reference ground floor in ECDC 16.43.030.B for locational requirements
Public hearing required
o Public hearing on interim ordinances within 60 days pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW
35A.63.220
o Purpose to consider findings of fact for the interim ordinance and either justify its
continuance or repeal the interim ordinance
o Draft findings provided in Exhibit 2 of packet
Planning Board/EDC Review
o BD Designated Street Issue Planning Board/EDC Schedule
■ Intro to Planning Board June 8
■ Into to EDC July 20
■ Joint Planning Board/EDC August 10
■ Planning Board Public hearing September 28
o More in-depth analysis than interim ordinance limited extensions should be considered with
2024 comprehensive plan update
Staff s recommendation
o Adopt finding of fact in Exhibit 2 which would mean this interim ordinance would continue
while the BD2 designated street front issue is discussed at planning board and EDC
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled raising the issue previously why Ordinance 3918 which was the c
culmination of many months of discussion with Roger Brooks regarding the whole downtown area was
not included and she was still confused why that very detailed ordinance that defines all the BD zones and
the design standards and things of that nature was not included. She also questioned references to 2011
versus 2013. Mr. Lien recalled Councilmember Buckshnis referencing that previously, how the BD2 was
mentioned in that ordinance. The language regarding BD2 has been there since the beginning of the BD �j
zones where it states mixed use commercial, it was not established by Ordinance 3918. When the c
legislative history was compiled, the focus was on the designated street front itself. Ordinance 3918 was a
continuation of the 2011 discussions when the designated street front happened. He reviewed: i
• Ordinance 3918 — Design Standards and building step -back a
o Applied Chapter 22.3 ECDC Design Standards to all BD Zones (formally used to only apply a
to BD1) N
o The step -back resulted in loss of usable space without achieving benefit in design
T
o Step -back was eliminated and design standards applied c
o Did not deal with the designated street front at all which is why it was not included in the w
legislative history
E
Council President Olson said this supports what Mr. Lien said earlier about a possible segue to the
comprehensive plan and how taking those in isolation was not necessarily the right thing. She referred to a
language in the Waterfront Study about extending the waterfront westward and connecting it to the
shoreline by encouraging mixed use development and pedestrian oriented amenities, etc. She wanted to
bring that to staff s and the council's attention in the context of integrating studies and ideas.
Councilmember Paine said she looked forward to the presentation tomorrow at Economic Development
Commission (EDC) and hoped that presentation will include economic analysis such as the study that was
done regarding commercial versus multifamily residential in that zoning. Mr. Lien said the limited market
study analysis provided when council adopted Ordinance 4262 in March has been provided to the EDC
and will be part of the presentation tomorrow.
Councilmember Buckshnis requested that study be provided to the council. She commented highest and
best use is always density. She recalled a great deal of time was spent with Roger Brooks and determining
these zones.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 7
Packet Pg. 100
Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing.
Greg Brewer, Edmonds, expressed support for expanding the street frontage lines for the BD2 mixed
use commercial zone. The manner in which the code governing the BD2 zone has been interpreted is of
great concern; the code should never need a 13-page document produced by staff and city attorney to
explain an interpretation. The code seemed clear to the public who commented months ago about
allowable uses, ground floor must be commercial for the first 45 feet. Unfortunately, interim standards
needed to be adopted quickly so the moratorium could be lifted. hi the process, a permitted use language
change was included along with the interim design standards; those are two separate issues. Council took
action to extend the street frontage line to protect more of the small and fragile business district, an effort
he fully supported, but the work is not done as these are interim standards. As the street frontage
ordinance moves through the EDC and planning board, he urged citizens to speak up and encourage
expansion of the line. This is a time to go the extra mile for the downtown business core and protect all
BD2 parcels for their intended use, mixed use commercial. Edmonds has been deemed a desirable
location to visit and live. This same scenario has played out around the world; a small town is discovered,
people and money flow in, development follows and in some cases new development displaces the very
thing people came for. Pressure to develop will be immense and the downtown core will become even
more precious as the city grows and citizens require more businesses and services to meet their needs.
With thoughtful and careful planning, the small scale and charm of downtown Edmonds has been saved
and should continue. He urged the council to give the entire BD2 zone protection from 100% residential
development.
Kathy Brewer, Edmonds, spoke in support of protecting and preserving the BD2 zone for what it was
designed for, downtown mixed commercial. The code states multiple dwelling units must be located on G
the second floor or behind the first 45 feet from sidewalk or rights -of -way. It was designed this way by v
0
wise predecessors to ensure a healthy and vibrant downtown business core. It is a very small but
important zone and 100% residential should not be allowed to encroach on BD2. The businesses in the c
BD2 zone should be protected. Due to staff s reinterpretation of code putting BD2 requirements into a
question, council voted to extend the blue line so that mixed commercial clearly must be adhered to a few a
lots up on Main Street & 6t' in the BD2 zone. This was to prevent an oversized, ugly apartment buildingcm
N
box from marring the historical downtown gateway and taking away businesses in the business district. It CD
should have never gotten this far. This was necessary and important and should be supported and upheld. c
She asked why mixed commercial was only being preserved on the blue line; there are lots in BD2 with w
businesses not on the blue line that are in jeopardy of being developed into 100% residential including
one on Dayton west of the library that has always housed businesses in a building built in 1901. It was
originally Baker's Funeral Home, a charming character -filled craftsman building with a similar style
detached building in the back that also houses a business. These two historical structures with business
space are in danger of being destroyed to allow a 100% multifamily apartment building by the same a
developer. If it is designed anything like the project on Main & 6t'', there should be concern.
Ms. Brewer continued, replacing buildings used for businesses with 100% residential should not be
allowed in the BD2 zone. Every building on the north side of Dayton, where this building is, up to the
library is mixed commercial. This property should also remain mixed commercial. During a recent
discussion with Planning Manager Kernen Lien, she was told during the course of creating interim design
standards for multifamily only in the BD2 zone, the code was rewritten to allow 100% multifamily
outside the blue line in BD2. It appears staff has taken advantage of the situation to rezone the BD2 zone.
Staff should not be allowed to rezone and eliminate businesses under the guise of improving design. She
requested council ensure this interim rezone language is not made permanent. There are two solutions to
this rezoning attempt, 1) hold staff to code that BD2 is mixed commercial everywhere in the zone, not just
on the blue line, or 2) extend the blue line throughout the BD2. This way everything that is built from
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 8
Packet Pg. 101
8.3.a
now on in BD2 will preserve and protect the businesses that are there. There are other zones that allow
100% multifamily in Edmonds and a lot of new apartment building are being built there. That is good, but
it is not good in the BD2 zone. She urged the council to do the right thing for the downtown business
district.
Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, expressed her sincere sadness on the passing of Councilmember K. Johnson.
She had smarts, inner strength, class, and humor and stayed focused on Edmonds and all its citizens and
will be greatly missed. With the BD2 street front designation and BD2 multifamily design standards now
on separate tracks, she respectfully reminded the council to take holistic control of the process once it
come back to council. The BD2 spot rezoning and rewriting of primary uses will alter core downtown
zoning from its original intent to have areas carved out for by -appointment businesses, often the small,
family owned ones for which Edmonds is well known, in the primary retail core where they belong.
Businesses in the BD2 zone create desirable jobs that pay a living wage which should be welcomed and
encouraged. These primary professional offices or home office uses create vital connections with their
clients and staff in the adjacent BD1 core retail and restaurant businesses, supporting a harmonious and
economic viable commercial core of the precious downtown that has stood for over 100 years. If this core
zoning is now permanently altered in a piecemeal fashion, it will neglect constituents' desire for the small
downtown to continue to be a core meeting, gathering, prosperous and eclectic mix of what makes the
unique town of Edmonds special. Many councilmembers ran on keeping the downtown core intact. Those
who visit or work in Edmonds have glowing praise for Edmonds. One block from council chambers, there
is commercial development, the Commons and before that, the Graphite Building. The downtown
commercial core is strong and a desirable place to do business from the business owner, visitors and
community members' perspective.
Ms. Dotsch urged the council to carefully review this process when it comes to council, and at a v
minimum, consider expanding the street front designation up the north side of Dayton which currently _
allows for mixed commercial, residential homes and home -based businesses. The BD2 multifamily only 0
design process seems to be a bit off the rails after watching the last Architectural Design Board meeting c
where over half the time was used by staff to promote adding roof decks even though council clearly a
expressed this was not the process for that. She supported the continuance of interim Ordinance 4262 so a
there can be robust local involvement and encouraged council to oversee this process from beginning to N
end. The Chamber is also a valuable resource. She requested hiring an outside company to review and oN,
organize the Edmonds City Code be an immediately priority as the City approaches the comprehensive c
plan process. Having it done by a professional person or company will ensure these types of irregular w
zoning, loopholes and code language issues are not continually creating critical hiccups that force
everything to stop and restart with piecemeal underwhelming results. With the planning department E
currently understaffed, it would seem more prudent to have someone outside the department who has the
time and in-depth knowledge to give Edmonds an understandable and consistent code before 2024.
Q
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, recalled the Chamber was formed in 1908. When she opened her brokerage
in 1980, the first thing she did was attend a Chamber meeting. At that time, the Chamber was dying and
South County Chamber wanted Edmonds to join them. Members of the Edmonds Chamber worked hard
to ensure the Chamber survived and part of that was the downtown zoning with businesses on the main
level and residential above. There is plenty of opportunity for multifamily in the community but it doesn't
have to be there.
Jenna Nand, Edmonds, relayed the community's preference for the council proceeding with caution
when making changes to zoning in the downtown core. The City is responding to regional pressure
created by forces outside its control like Jeff Bezos deciding to build an entire Amazon headquarters on
the middle of south Lake Union, easy driving distance to Edmonds, raising the issue of whether Edmonds
is a bedroom community for Seattle or does it have its own unique identity. She recalled in 2019
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 9
Packet Pg. 102
8.3.a
Councilmember Olson suggesting defining Edmonds charm, what makes Edmonds charming and how to
protect it. That is related to things other commentors have raised such as historical structures which may
not be the most efficient at housing density but Edmonds character and identity needs to be considered
versus the behemoth neighbor Seattle. Shoreline decided to do a 50,000 unit upzone in response to the
light rail. She grew up in Shoreline and no longer recognizes it other than Seattle sprawl. She urged
caution for anything that would take away from the business -related nature of BD2.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, expressed his strong support for all the great citizen comments made tonight by
Greg Brewer, Kathy Brewer, Michelle Dotsch, Jenna Nand, Joan Longstaff and incredible comments
made previously by Linda Fireman. This has been one of the most complicated issues to track and follow
that he has witnessed in all the years he has been engaged with Edmonds city government. It has been
extremely difficult to keep track of what's going on from one step to another. He encouraged the council
to step it up; there is a lot of work to be done and the City needs to work hard to engage citizens to get
this right. The City has a very poor history of moratoriums and interim zoning ordinances over the years
including forgetting to have the required public hearings within 60 days such as Ordinance 4006 in June
2015 as well as the recent Ordinance 4210. He encouraged the City to improve its practices as a city
government. The process needs to be followed for interim zoning ordinances and moratoriums to do it
right which includes adopting findings of fact. Although the council can have someone else do it by
adopting whereas clauses as the findings of fact, he encouraged the council to take it to a higher level and
not adopt findings of fact in a whereas section, but write their own findings of fact that justify why they
adopt an interim zoning ordinance or moratorium. He was hopeful there would be improvement in the
future and thanked the council for their hard work.
Jay Grant, Edmonds, said he was encouraged by the comments made by the previous speakers. His
family moved to Edmonds in 1963, he walked to Edmonds Junior High School, dear friends owned the
Edmonds Hardware Store, and Edmonds was a safe place to be. There are over 200 multifamily
complexes in Edmonds; preserving the downtown core for thriving businesses is very important.
Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing.
Mr. Lien advised the finding of fact are in Exhibit 2 of the packet for council consideration. N
N
0)
Councilmember Buckshnis wanted to ensure BD2 zones retain the spirt of Ordinance 3918 which defined c
BD2 as downtown mixed commercial. She recalled requesting that Ordinance 3918 be part of this but did w
not see it. City Attorney Jeff Taraday requested she elaborate on what she meant, whether it was her
intent not to allow any residential only buildings in the BD2 zone. Councilmember Buckshnis answered
that was correct. Mr. Taraday said that would require a code change that the council has not yet adopted
and was not under consideration tonight. Tonight's business is for the council to state their justification
for the existing interim ordinance that has already been adopted. There is nothing to prevent the council Q
from adopting an ordinance such as Councilmember Buckshnis described, but the council would need to
provide direction regarding whether that would be done on an interim basis and whether it would be sent
to the planning Board. The normal process for an interim ordinance is the planning board reviews it and
makes a recommendation to the city council on a permanent ordinance. What Councilmember Buckshnis
described could theoretically be part of the planning board's recommendation for a permanent ordinance,
but he did not know to what extent that was already within the range of possibilities the planning board
was already considering. Mr. Lien said once the interim ordinance is passed, it goes to the planning board
to review the interim ordinance and make a recommendation to council. The designated street front went
through that process at the EDC and planning board in 2011.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the council had a public hearing and now there are findings of fact to
consider but she has heard completely different information from the public. She supported retaining the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 10
Packet Pg. 103
8.3.a
BD zoning in accordance with the ordinance and if there is a desire to redo downtown zoning, it should be
done very carefully and not just spot zoning. Citizens and she are confused and she was unsure how
things left the track and there is suddenly residentially only in the downtown area when Ordinance 3918
specifically does not say residential only. She was unsure how this reached the moratorium stage as it
should never have even made it to the drawing board. Mr. Lien said a 13-page legislative history was
prepared regarding how the designated street front came to be. The city attorney's and his interpretation
was that multifamily use was allowed outside the designated street front.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she continued to be confused regarding how ordinances are piggybacked
without repealing one and starting another. Ordinance 3918 does not allow residential only. She wanted to
ensure the BD designations were retained. She referred to Durbin and 6` Avenue where a speaker
mentioned the former Bakers Funeral Home would be residential only but it is a BD2 zone. She wanted to
retain the BD2 zoning standards originally identified in Ordinance 3918 which was never repealed.
Mr. Lien referred to the 13-page legislative history that the city attorney and he prepared. The original BD
ordinance did not reference designated street front but required commercial on the ground floor. The first
ordinance that adopted a designed street front was Ordinance 3700. He displayed the map from Ordinance
3700:
• Ordinance 3700 — BDl Zone 30 foot depth
.NplG.f}t: uoip.td en..1 I— Ir., r.ure.on i. f►. 6I)1 Z-
0 fMopfoW b..w Far W+e.`d 8a foot no...rV po+wfdMrm. vH6.to-1
o Map only applied to BD 1 zone
o BD1 zone designated street front 30-feet in depth
o Zoning text —"for all other BD zones the designated street front is established as the first 60
feet of the lot measured perpendicular to any street right-of-way, excluding alleys."
Mr. Lien explained the map came about via a challenge to an interpretation regarding what was allowed
on the ground floor for a property at 6' & Main and whether it was required to wrap around the corner on
6`h. The council adopted an interim ordinance at that time and forwarded it to the planning board for
review. The result was Ordinance 3700 that mapped the designated street front for the BD zones and did
not wrap around the corner on 6`h
He displayed the map in Ordinance 3865:
0 Ordinance 3865 — Revised 2011
N
N
0)
T
0
W
E
0
2
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 11
Packet Pg. 104
8.3.a
� Oosgnelul 51ruc1F�nl .�{
+r
8n7
ena Do+
_ 4A4lE
A— IT �
RLMR
—1
WUNYI IT
BD7
� wwl�. war
w .arcL.ro �
z
++ALRN $1
o Designated street front mapped for all BD zones
0 45 feet from mapped designated street front
o Reviewed by planning board and EDC
o "The purpose of the map is to clarify where the primary pedestrian areas and commercial uses
are intended to be oriented within the BD Zones." (Rob Chave, PB Public Hearing,
2011.06.08)
Mr. Lien explained if the two maps are compared, it looks like an extension of the designated street front,
however, it is actually a contraction because there are now portions of the BD2, BD4 and BD5 zones that
do not have a designated street front. There was a great deal of discussion at the EDC and planning board
and reading the minutes, they wanted to revisit it due to concern whether there should be designated street
front past Howell Way and discussion about whether it made sense to have designated street front in the
Arts Corridor, but it was ultimately adopted and has not been revisited. There was discussion about uses
outside the designated street front; all other uses allowed in the zone are allowed outside the designated
street front which is how there are residential only buildings outside the mapped designated street front.
That has been a consistent interpretation for every building permit application since these ordinances were
adopted, the post office building, another building with residential only on the ground floor, and a
residential only building outside the designated street front. It is also consistent with the legislative
history.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there was a moratorium as a result of the 9-unit apartment that had no
parking. Mr. Lien advised that resulted in another code change to require parking. Councilmember
Buckshnis expressed concern with piggybacking ordinances and not repealing any. She wanted to retain
the downtown core and not get into density creep, commenting there was already plenty of multifamily in
the downtown area. She recalled the council spent many months on the BD2 zoning including
presentations by Roger Brooks about a vibrant downtown. She recommended revisiting this to ensure the
downtown core is retained. Mr. Lien advised this is the process where it will be revisited and go through
planning board and the EDC. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not understand how some of the
projects in the BD2 were even proposed.
N
N
(n
ti
0
W
c
m
E
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 12
Packet Pg. 105
8.3.a
Council President Olson agreed this has been very confusing and the fact that there is a 13-page
explanation is evidence of that confusion. She understood there wasn't a zoning change, changing to say
that multifamily allowed is the result of the 13-page explanation that outlines the legislative intent along
the way. She reiterated there was not a zoning change, the 13 pages clarify what happened. What another
councilmember is mentioning is whether the council wants to make different changes.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION IN THE PACKET, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO SUPPORT
THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 4262, WHICH ADOPTED INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD
ZONES.
Council President Olson commented there are many intermixing parts and it has been a long time since a
deep dive was done on some of the planning documents and there are many separated silos. She was
excited after being on council 2% years that she had a broad enough base to put them together and
understand how things mesh and to work with staff. She was glad this will go to the planning board who
can take a harder look at it. There is an interim ordinance in place, and the council is required to do
findings of fact to support the interim ordinance. She encouraged the council to pass the resolution and
get on to the business that either backs up the interim ordinance or a different, better, permanent plan.
Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for the interim ordinance; it is a good start and has brought up
a lot of discussion that the City needs to have. Since 2011, the downtown has become even more vibrant
than many might have expected and the commercial enterprises in the downtown zone need to be
preserved. This is an appropriate time to pass this resolution to include it in the planning process. He
recalled a time when the downtown core had a lot of vacant spaces and a former mayor was very involved
in bringing back businesses and getting grants to support those activities. There has been a tremendous
trajectory of improvement and Edmonds has become an attractive place to do business and use services.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to packet page 246 where she proposed adding a whereas clause that °
the council previous voted on but was never included. The previous motion was to add a whereas clause a
that Ordinance 3918 defines 13132 as downtown commercial. Mr. Taraday explained the findings in the
packet are a draft of the council's proposed findings. Staff cannot read councilmembers' minds about the N
findings which is the reason for the public hearing. The council hears from the public, reflects on what the CD
public says, considers the draft findings and what they heard from public and their own thoughts, and then io
decides whether the draft findings are significantly reflective of the council's thoughts to warrant };
approving them. If they are not, the council can amend the findings so they can support the resolution.
The proposed findings are a draft and can be amended; the findings are his best guess and opinion of the E
justification for the ordinance. Councilmember Buckshnis said she understands the process, but if the
council voted on this whereas clause, why didn't it appear in the document. She asked if she should make a
another amendment. Mr. Taraday answered she could certainly do that.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON,
TO ADD A WHEREAS CLAUSE THAT ORDINANCE 3918 DEFINES BD2 AS DOWNTOWN
MIXED COMMERCIAL.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented this must have slipped through the cracks as the council voted on
this on April 21, 2022.
Councilmember Chen said it is clear from the public comment that it is the will of the people to protect
the downtown core. He expressed support for the findings of fact so it can move on to the next stage. He
saw protecting the downtown core as an opportunity for Highway 99.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 13
Packet Pg. 106
8.3.a
Council President Olson raised a point of order, requesting the councilmember speak to the amendment.
Mayor Nelson ruled point taken.
Councilmember Chen expressed support for the amendment as the council had voted on it previously. He
began to continue his comments about Highway 99.
Council President Olson raised a point of order, advising the council needed to vote on the amendment
before returning to general discussion. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked Mr. Lien to read the definition of downtown mixed commercial. Mr.
Lien answered there is not a definition per se. What Councilmember Buckshnis refers to in Ordinance
3918 is language that has existed since the BD zones were originally adopted. He referred to ECDC
16.43.010 that refers to different subdistricts, "The downtown business zone is divided into five
subdistricts, each intended to implement specific aspects of the comprehensive plan that pertain to the
downtown and waterfront activity center. Each subdistrict contains its own unique mix of uses and zoning
and regulations as described in this chapter. There are five districts, BD1, downtown retail core, BD2,
downtown mixed commercial, BD3 downtown convenience commercial, BD4, downtown mixed
residential, and BD5, downtown arts corridor." There are no definitions about the uses but the use table
states what is allowed in the zones as does the remainder of ECDC 16.43.
Councilmember L. Johnson did not support the amendment. People have stated they found this process
confusing. While she agreed the 13 pages were a lot to digest and understand, it spells out how we got to
where we are. There is no clear definition of downtown mixed commercial; googling it results in a variety
of definitions. This amendment continues the lack of clarity and moves things in the wrong direction.
Councilmember Paine said Ordinance 3918 does not add any specificity or clarity to the BD2 which is
unfortunate. She agreed things needed to be clearer and there needed to be an easier path that everyone
can understand. Sometimes if the normal procedures are not followed, things get added at the last minute
which does not add clarity.
Councilmember Tibbott asked when the BD zones were established and if BD2 was considered a mixed N
commercial area, did that
imply that every building would have a commercial element. Mr. Lien oN,
answered when the BD zones were initially adopted, there was a requirement for commercial on the c
ground floor. Mr. Lien reviewed
the following w
• BD Ordinance History c
o Ordinance 3624
— Original BD zone Adoption (Jan 2007) E
o Ordinance 3700
— First Designated Street Front (November 2008)
o Ordinance 3865
— Revised Designated Street Front (Dec 2011)
Q
o Ordinance 3894
— Interim Ordinance for Farmer's Market (Sept 2012)
o Ordinance 3902
— Food Trucks (Sept 2012)
o Ordinance 3918
— Design standards and building step -back (Apr 2013
o Ordinance 3932
— Farmers Markets (July 2013
o Ordinance 3955
— BD1 GFSF (Jan 2014)
o Ordinance 4190
— Parking (Feb 2019)
Mr. Lien said the 13-page memo contains several excerpts from the planning board and city council
minutes and it seemed clear that the planning board and council were aware that where there wasn't a
designated street front, any other allowed use was allowed in those areas.
Councilmember Tibbott asked for clarification, on that date it was permissible in BD2 outside the
designated street front to have residential only. Mr. Lien answered yes, beginning with Ordinance 3865 in
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 14
Packet Pg. 107
8.3.a
December 2011. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the other ordinance was ever repealed. Mr. Lien
answered it was not repealed, but has been amended a number of times over the years. Councilmember
Tibbott clarified it did not need to be repealed, it was just amended. Mr. Lien answered yes. He explained
when the designated street front was contracted via Ordinance 3865, where there was not a designated
street front, all the other uses were allowed which resulted in allowing residential only. Councilmember
Tibbott observed in BD2 there became a mix of uses, not a requirement for mixed use in every building.
Mr. Lien answered yes, outside the designated street front.
Councilmember Tibbott did not support the amendment to add the whereas clause. It's clear it was
established in 2011 that a mix of uses in BD2 was permissible. He was comfortable with the idea that the
interim ordinance extends where commercial is required. He commended the planning board's work in
further developing how to expand commercial uses in BD2. That may be part of the comprehensive plan
process or it may precede the comprehensive plan process. Mr. Lien answered if the intent is to take a
larger, more holistic look at the downtown, that should be part of the comprehensive plan process.
Councilmember Tibbott was supportive of that.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out 2011 was superseded by 2013 when the study was done that talks
about downtown mixed residential. She reiterated the council already approved this language on April 21,
2022 and it was left out.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND BUCKSHNIS
VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO, AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON ABSTAINING.
Councilmember Chen expressed support for adopting the findings of fact. Development is occurring on
Highway 99 and services such as parks, and other luxury items in downtown should also be made
available in other areas so the City is treated as one city. He supported the findings of fact to protect the
downtown core, commenting the downtown is unique and deserves attention to protect the mixed use
zoning.
Councilmember L. Johnson commented the area is in the middle of a housing crisis. People talk about a
vibrant downtown which means people and walkability; this brings people who will walk to businesses. cm
Comments about this issue have changed over time; they started with this is ugly and box -like and
included opinions that people who reside in apartments do not have the same pride in where they reside as w
those who live in condos or single family. She found it frustrating to parse out the real concern, whether it
was a true concern about the need for more commercial or whether it was a desire to keep out additional
multifamily. While she respected that Highway 99 was an opportunity, it is only one opportunity, and the
City should not focus multifamily efforts in just one area. Studies show dispersing multifamily throughout
the community and mixed use communities benefit the entire community. If the concern is to keep plenty Q
of commercial available and not an attempt to keep out multifamily, consideration should be given to
increasing heights to allow for true mixed use. As written, it is cost prohibitive to develop residential
mixed use. If the council wants to solve problems, it should be pursued with an honest attempt. She did
not support the motion.
Councilmember Paine said she was satisfied with the drafted findings of fact. She shared
Councilmembers Chen and L. Johnson's concern it will be uneven. If the desire is to have vibrancy and
evenness across all of Edmonds, there needs to be the same level of focus and concentration on all areas
where there can possibly be good residential/commercial mixed use so all neighborhoods can benefit from
commercial and vibrancy. There are similar opportunities in other business districts to improve
walkability, vibrancy and get the right mix. Retail and restaurants in the City survived the pandemic, and
whether people like them or not, the streateries were great example of a way to support businesses in the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 15
Packet Pg. 108
8.3.a
downtown area. She hoped there would be the same amount of time, energy, and thought given to
neighborhoods so the zoning would be equally as vibrant as the downtown area.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, AND
PAINE, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS
BUCKSHNIS AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO.
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR -
APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson advised this item is the appointment of Todd Tatum to the community
services/economic development director position. The process is outlined in the packet. She described Mr.
Tatum's qualifications: he has held increasingly responsible positions with Washington States Parks &
Rec including the business development manager and is currently the division manager for parks
development. He is a U.S. Army veteran who holds a master's degree in business and bachelor's degree
in finance. His work with Washington State Parks & Rec has included providing leadership and strategic
direction in planning, real estate, design of new parks, and creating historical tribal partnerships. His work
included integrating both SEPA and state and local land use policy into parks plans and construction
efforts. He has also worked closely with the state legislature and municipal leaders on issues related to
tourism and economic development. He passed all required background and reference checks. Mayor
Nelson requests confirmation of his appointment to the position of community services/economic
development director along with approval of the employment contract which is consistent with previous
directors employment contracts.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO
CONFIRM MAYOR NELSON'S APPOINTMENT OF TODD TATUM.
Council President Olson commented it was nice to have good news this week. She welcomed Mr. Tatum,
commenting his collaboration and partnership background stood out and got her excited about hiring him.
N
N
Councilmember Chen welcomed Mr. Tatum, commenting he enjoyed their conversation during the r
council interview process. Among his many other strengths, Mr. Tatum will bring emphasis on equity, a c
skill the City can use. w
c
m
Councilmember L. Johnson welcomed Mr. Tatum, commenting his arrival to Edmonds was much needed E
and she could not wait for him to get started as there is a lot to accomplish.
Councilmember Paine welcomed Mr. Tatum, commenting it was an exciting step for everyone. She hoped a
he would enjoy getting to know the council. She congratulated him and welcomed him to Edmonds.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. EDMONDS WATERFRONT ISSUES STUDY
Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin introduced consultant, Scott Bonjukian, Makers,
explaining he has been a great asset in helping with complex issues with the waterfront. He and staff
understand the complexities with the waterfront and its iconic character and the identity it provides to the
downtown core. For decades Edmonds Crossing was an assumption and removing that from the
comprehensive plan is a significant gap. A waterfront vision will position Edmonds to be more defensible
when agencies ask for new ideas, the City will know what it wants in partnership with those agencies. It is
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 16
Packet Pg. 109
8.3.a
critical to include a waterfront vision in the comprehensive plan while fully recognizing the status of the
Unocal property, the first right of refusal with WSDOT and other critical issues. She cited the importance
of the marsh restoration and that area as future open space.
Scott Bonjukian, Urban Planning Consultant, Makers, reviewed:
• Background
o Project Purpose
■ The purpose of this project was to identify strategic updates and high-level
recommendations to be considered in the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to
reflect new information about waterfront uses, needs, and issues.
- 30 references and 8 pages in the plan are dedicated to Edmonds Crossing
- This affects assumptions about the future of the Downtown Waterfront and the
Edmonds Marsh
o Issues Studied
1. Edmonds Crossing
2. Ferry Service
3. Unocal Property
4. Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek Restoration
5. Natural Hazards and Critical Areas
6. Railroad Double -Tracking
7. Waterfront Emergency Access
8. Edmonds Station Access Projects and Sound Transit Service
9. Bus Service
10. Port of Edmonds
11. Land Use and Economic Development
o Study Area
■ From the shoreline to 3' Avenue
■ From Edmonds Street to Pine Street
Project Team
o City Staff
■ Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager
■ Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director
o Makers
■ Bob Benford
■ Scott Bonjukian
o The Watershed Company
N
N
0)
T
0
W
E
n
2
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 17
Packet Pg. 110
8.3.a
■ Nell Lund
■ Pete Heltzel
o Leland Consulting Group
■ Brian Vanneman
■ Sam Brookham
Work To -Date
o Public Outreach
■ Online meeting in October 2021 with 37 participants
■ Live polling indicated marsh restoration, flooding and sea level rise and waterfront
access issues were the top concerns.
■ Key priorities in written comments:
- Enhancing the marsh as a wildlife reserve and avoiding development
- Planning for climate change
- Retaining the unique charm, character, and natural features of the waterfront
■ Stakeholder interviews in late 2021 with:
- Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Washington State
Ferries (WSF)
- Sound Transit
- Community Transit
- BNSF Railway
- Port of Edmonds
- Tulalip Tribes
- Save Our Marsh
- JSH Properties
- Lund Consulting representing Chevron/Unocal
o Research
■ Over 40 reports and records reviewed to establish key facts
■ Follow-up stakeholder conversations c
■ Research support from staff at Edmonds departments of Public Works & Utilities and a
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services a
o Key Findings and Recommendations Memo N
cm
■ Incorporates key findings from the research and the stakeholder interviews
■ Makes recommendations based on the key findings, best practices, and consultant c
observations w
■ Organized by: c
- Executive Summary E
- Introduction
- Sections 1-1Ion each key issue
- Section 12 with sources Q
o Top Recommendations
■ Create a new vision for the waterfront
■ Recognize and support the Edmonds ferry terminal's current location
■ Prioritize Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration
■ Plan for improved emergency management of the waterfront
Key Findings and Recommendations
1. Edmonds Crossing
o Key Findings
■ The project originated in the 1990's and was active until 2005
■ Evidence points to the project being effectively cancelled with no signs of life
- No major documentation published since FEIS
- Not included in WSF 2040 Long Range Plan
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 18
Packet Pg. 111
8.3.a
2
- Legislature did not include the project in the 2022 "Move Ahead Washington"
package
- The Legislature's official stance is that the City of Edmonds should be able to
purchase the Unocal Property for habitat enhancement
o Recommendations
■ Update the Downtown Waterfront vision in a community engagement process as part
of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update (1.A)
■ Address how each Edmonds Crossing reference should be addressed in the
Comprehensive Plan update (1.B-1.Q)
Ferry Service
o Key Findings
■ WSF plans three -boat service Edmonds -Kingston to increase service frequency and
capacity
■ WSF has not analyzed impacts of train traffic
■ The WSF Long Range Plan anticipates a study of Edmonds terminal improvements
o Recommendations
■ Develop policies that recognize the existing ferry terminal and its current location
■ When three -boat service or a vehicle reservation system advances, the City should
collaborate on joint transportation planning
■ Ferry Traffic Study (Recommendation 2.13)
- Adopt a transportation policy that supports a ferry traffic study to assess the
impacts on the Downtown Waterfront.
- The study should also quantify the current number and duration of train crossing -
closures at Main Street and Dayton Street.
Unocal Property G
o Key Findings - Ownership c
■ 1991: Bulk fuel terminal closes 0
■ 2005: WSDOT enters purchase and sale agreement c
■ December 2017: Cleanup system installed to remove contamination a
■ June 2023: Expiration of the City's state -provided "right of first purchase at fair a
market value"cm
N
■ December 2023: An assessment will determine whether the cleanup goals have been CD
met
■ WSDOT will be given title once the Department of Ecology has deemed the site w
sufficiently cleaned
■ If deemed surplus, WSDOT will be required to receive fair market value for the E
E
property
o Key Findings - Zoning
■ The site is zoned Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) under a 2002 contract a
rezone
■ If a different zoning is envisioned (e.g. open space), the City must approve a new
master plan as a comprehensive plan amendment, a planned residential development,
or as a contract rezone.
■ Alternatively, the City or the property owner may initiate a rezone at any time.
o Recommendations
■ Exercise the right of first purchase by June 2023, or update the City's legislative
agenda to include an extension of the right
■ Determine the community's desired future land use of the Unocal Property
■ This public process is expected to result in a redesignating and rezoning of the
Unocal Property for open space purposes
■ Unocal Property real estate appraisal (Recommendation 3.A)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 19
Packet Pg. 112
8.3.a
E
5.
- Retain an outside firm to perform a development feasibility assessment of the
Unocal Property to determine its fair market value. These analyses should
consider the site's accessibility, ecological features, contamination, and other
customary real estate considerations.
Edmonds Marsh & Willow Creek Restoration
o Key Findings
■ The main action needed for restoration is daylighting Willow Creek and improving
fish access to migrate, rear, and forage in the marsh
■ A sinuous channel east of the railroad will provide beneficial habitat for fish and
other animals
■ Stakeholders have expressed interest in moving the creek further away from the
railroad tracks than illustrated in conceptual designs
■ WSDOT has no concerns with this if public process, environmental considerations
around contamination, and appropriate compensation lead to that conclusion
o Recommendations
■ Continue prioritizing the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project
■ If Edmonds acquires the Unocal Property, update the design options for Willow
Creek restoration to optimize ecological outcomes and further improve fish habitat
■ Coordinate on areawide pollutant control to minimize untreated runoff
Natural Hazards and Critical Areas
o Key Findings
■ Most of the waterfront is within a 100-year floodplain
■ Sea level rise of 4" - 4' expected long term
■ The Edmonds Marsh restoration project rise may result in increased flood risk
■ Large portion of the waterfront is in an area susceptible to liquefaction in an
earthquake
o Recommendations
■ Plan for flood mitigation as an essential component of the Edmonds Marsh
restoration project
■ Update/modernize natural hazard planning policies
Railroad Double -Tracking
o Key Findings
■ BNSF Railway plans a second track between Edmonds Street and Point Wells
■ It will be located within BNSF Railway right-of-way
■ Construction anticipated to begin 2024
■ Specific design plans are not available
o Recommendations
■ Create additional planning policies that support mitigation of railroad traffic
■ Apply to create a full quiet zone
■ Seek to minimize construction impacts and maintain Edmonds Station's full function
Waterfront Emergency Access
o Key Findings
■ Approximately 40 trains pass through daily
■ The "gate down" time currently averages about two minutes per train
■ Future projections show 60-80 trains per day
■ The waterfront and marina area west of the railroad have special emergency access
considerations because of the isolation
■ Ferry delays have been documented
o Recommendations
■ Create new policies to jointly plan and implement enhanced emergency management
services in the area
N
N
a)
T
0
w
c
m
E
0
2
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 20
Packet Pg. 113
■ Pursue a previous recommendation (from the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access
Study) to plan for a midblock pedestrian overpass
■ Explore an emergency vehicle overpass below Point Edwards to Admiral Way in
coordination with the Port of Edmonds and BNSF Railway
Edmonds Station Access and Service
o Key Findings
■ Commuter rail service is 4 daily trips compared to 8 trips pre-COVID
■ Due to financial challenges, the station access projects are delayed by ten years
o Recommendation
■ Incorporate the station access projects into the Comprehensive Plan
■ Support the projects' implementation as soon as possible
9. Bus Service
o Key Findings
■ In 2024, bus service will better connect Downtown Edmonds to light rail
■ Most lines will run every 15 minutes, requiring new Downtown layover space
■ Future extension of the Orange Line and a south "emphasis corridor" are unfunded
o Recommendations m
■ Continue joint planning of the Downtown transit center improvements, and promote
more direct service to the light rail stations
■ Add policy support for bus service improvements on local streets
10. Port of Edmonds
o Key Findings
■ Bulkhead reconstruction and new administration building plans are ongoing —
■ Harbor Square property is economically stable 3
■ No other projects planned v
o Recommendation c
■ As they arise, continue coordinating infrastructure and development planning 0
between the City and the Port c
11. Land Use and Economic Development a
o Key Findings Q
■ Edmonds stands out with its historic character, human -scaled development pattern, N
and walkable waterfront CD
■ The major properties in the study are well -utilized, including Harbor Square, Salish c
Crossing, and the Edmonds Waterfront Center/Senior Center w
■ The community's vision for the level of density and vibrancy on the Downtown
Waterfront is unclear
E
o Recommendations — Visioning
■ Craft an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront as part of the 2024
Comprehensive Plan update a
■ The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires for the type and
intensity of desired land uses
■ The vision should reflect market realities, sea level rise, and other conditions
o Recommendations — Economic Development
■ Continue efforts to finish the waterfront walkway
■ Adopt policies that support working to attract a hotel operator and associated uses
■ Consider adopting policies that allow a wider mix of land uses in the Commercial
Waterfront zone
■ Create an adaptive reuse support program
■ Explore infill/redevelopment concepts that explore the tradeoffs of modest and
strategic development capacity changes in exchange for desired public benefits and
amenities
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 21
Packet Pg. 114
8.3.a
Parking Study (Recommendation 11.H)
- Conduct a comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront area to
understand current utilization, find opportunities for consolidated parking and
shared parking, and analyze possible changes to parking regulations for off-street
and on -street parking. The study should compare Edmonds and similar
downtown waterfronts.
Mr. Lien commented one of the key recommendations is a new vision for the waterfront area. The
Edmonds Crossing has been part of the comprehensive plan since the 1990s. There have been a number of
downtown/waterfront visioning projects that have been incorporated into the comprehensive plan.
Extracting Edmonds Crossing from the comprehensive plan is not as easy as just deleting it; it will be a
big job and new vision for the waterfront area without Edmonds Crossing and with the ferry terminal in
its current location should be a major part of the 2024 comprehensive plan update. Staff's
recommendation for next steps is to begin implementing the recommendations in the waterfront study
with the comprehensive plan update in 2024. Ms. Laughlin advised the RFP for that vision is out now and
closes on August 5'.
For Council President Olson, Ms. McLaughlin advised the RFP is being currently being advertised and
closes August 5th. The proposals will be reviewed, interviews conducted and a consultant selected to
begin the work. She was hopeful visioning sessions would be occurring throughout the City by the end of
the summer.
Council President Olson commented if the council adopts the study, the expectation is to implement the —
recommendations in the study. She referred to an email she sent staff about information in the study 3
regarding acquisition of as many parks as possible in that area which she felt was in conflict with the G
PROS Plan priorities. Mr. Lien said he could not find what she was referencing in the study; the biggest c
acquisition is the Unocal property. The City's first right of refusal expires in 2023; the recommendation is 0
to ensure that is extended if necessary. He did not recall recommendations to acquire other properties. c
Council President Olson recalled the terms necklacing and tying things together. Mr. Lien wondered if a
that was related to the walkway. Council President Olson recalled it was related to land acquisition. Ms. a
McLaughlin offered to search the study for that reference. N
N
CD
Council President Olson expressed concern about delaying removal of Edmonds Crossing from the c
comprehensive plan and removing reference to moving the ferry terminal until the 2024 comprehensive w
plan update. Ms. McLaughlin answered she was confident the electeds and the community want the same
thing related to the Unocal property becoming open space to support marsh restoration. The timing is E
sensitive because WSDOT does not currently own the property, Edmonds has first right of refusal but
WSDOT is also obligated to get fair market value and the property is currently zoned for a larger
development. There are legal implications if the City changes the comprehensive plan to be inconsistent a
with the zoning as the comprehensive plan designation and the zoning need to be consistent to be
compliant with the GMA. Staff is confident they have signaled intent many times to WSDOT and have a
good relationship with WSDOT as well as the City's first right of refusal and recent correspondence that
WSDOT supports legislative action to formalize the extension until the environmental cleanup is
completed and properties can change hands. Establishing the waterfront vision will strengthen the
community's expectation of the waterfront area as well as strengthen the City's position.
Council President Olson said that was the first time she had heard the change related to when the cleanup
was done and asked if that was in writing. Ms. McLaughlin said those conversations are ongoing. With
the confirmation of the new economic development director, she was confident that will be formalized via
the 2023 legislative agenda. Mr. Lien added the defensibility of the change is important; the state
recognizes the City plans to use the Unocal property for environmental purposes so the proviso that gave
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 22
Packet Pg. 115
8.3.a
the City first right of refusal notes WSDOT shall provide the City with the first right to purchase at
market value for the City's intended use of the property to rehabilitate nearshore habitat for salmon and
related species.
Councilmember Buckshnis hoped the council was not ready to vote on implementing the
recommendations as some were inaccurate and some issues were not even discussed such as partnering
with the Port which is extremely important. The study does not bring up the special zoning of Harbor
Square and the need to work with the Port on zoning changes. She was concerned by how much was left
out of the study and she did not believe there was enough public input. The continued reference to the
marsh design was never properly approved by council; it was a backroom issue with the former mayor
and a former director related to connector negotiations. The $13-16 million includes seawalls and has
nothing to do with marsh restoration. That value was assigned as part of mitigation for the connector
project, but it continues to be used as the cost.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to downzoning the property to open space. The study does not
reference culverts on SR-104, something that WSDOT can address that will enhance the Shellabarger side
of the marsh and the Edmonds Marsh. The study does not address the sewer plant which will be at
capacity. She suggested forming a taskforce to review the study and offered to serve on the taskforce. The
council also needs to look at the study from a CIP/CFP standpoint; there is currently no emergency access
in the CIP/CFP, yet this study includes that recommendation. Another issue is the missing link which she
has never supported as she did not believe creating a walkway was feasible, it will be detrimental for the
environment and for fish. The discussion about the emergency access needs be thoughtful and she did not
support putting anything through the marsh.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there were several designs proposed for a connector, commenting c
there needed to be collaboration with the Port on a lot of issues. The study does not discuss the fishing c
pier which the City put millions into. There is a lot of history missing and information about partnerships 0
with the Port who owns approximately half the property. She hoped the council would not pass the c
recommendations and would form a taskforce to discuss the issues and add an emergency access during a
the CIP/CFP process. There will also be homeland security issues if a third ferry is docked in Edmonds. a
She concluded this is a great report that summarizes things, but it did not engage the public or people who N
have been around long enough to know what's going on. She offered to serve on a taskforce and oN,
suggested the Port also be included. c
w
Ms. McLaughlin said Councilmember Buckshnis' comments help substantiate the need for the vision.
The lack of vision makes everything so complicated and pegs one issue over another. Establishing a
vision will bring the community, agencies and the council together so it can be collectively defended
when proposals come up, when grant opportunities arise, and move forward with efficiency. She agreed
with Councilmember Buckshnis' suggestion to work with the Port. Vision comes first, followed by policy a
which is the comprehensive plan, then technical analysis such as culverts, wastewater capacity, etc. and
then the CIP/CFP process. It needs to be done in the right order to get it right.
Councilmember Paine said the study was extremely well done and brought up a lot of issues. She would
like to see the recommendations separated into those that are and are not comprehensive plan dependent,
and recommendations related to initiatives the City should be considering related to the climate crisis
such as sea level rise. The City has to figure out how to guard against water infiltration into the
wastewater treatment plant because it is only a few inches above sea level and there are many other issues
the City needs to plan for and implement quickly as sea level rise is expected to be 9 inches by 2040. She
appreciated all the elements in that were in this study. She referred to things she thought she knew such as
the second track being on the west rather than the east side and that the third ferry would be docked in
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 23
Packet Pg. 116
8.3.a
Kingston because they have the space instead of Edmonds where there is no room to expand the dock.
There are a lot of questions and prioritization that needs to be done.
Councilmember Paine was glad the RFP for a comprehensive plan consultant was being advertised. She
was hopeful a lot of the elements in Senate Bill 1099 from the last legislative session could be
incorporated as well as resiliency and sustainability priorities and best practices. She suggested a little
more work needed to be done on the study such as a roadmap.
Councilmember Tibbott affirmed other councilmembers comments about filling missing gaps. Visioning
processes are like a child's coloring book, it starts with the lines, then detail and color is added. He
recognized it may take a couple years before the picture is filled in. A lot of the council's questions will
be answered in the process of moving toward a vision. He appreciated the study and supported the idea of
putting all the recommendations on one page so they can be prioritized which may make it easier to
identify the gaps.
Councilmember Tibbott referred to the recommendation for a traffic study related to the ferry service. He
suggested that should be funded by the state rather than the city as the state is creating the urgency.
Similarly with regard to a connector, with double tracking, BNSF will need to figure out a way to get
people across the tracks and BNSF should pay for that, not the City. He concurred the City should work
with the Port. As the council liaison to the Port, there is a lot of exciting activity happening at the Port as
well as a desire to improve economic development in that area. Completing the boardwalk will add a
pedestrian amenity to the waterfront that is not referenced in the study. The Port's current offices will be
demolished and replaced with a park. The marina is an industrial and recreation complex that will soon
include a park and that should be included in the study.
Mr. Lien advised language was added to the report about improvements to the walkway and park on the c
Port's boardwalk. With regard to coordinating with the Port and other stakeholders in the area, he agreed 0
that was part of the comprehensive plan process. Part of the process for this study and recommendation c
include continuing that coordination with stakeholders. The Port was one of the agencies the consultant a
met with and changes were made based on their comments. The Port is the major property owner on the Q
waterfront and will be part of the process. It was his understanding when BNSF was involved in N
discussions regarding the connector project, they were willing to cooperate but would not provide any oN,
funding. In the interview with BNSF regarding this study, they did not share much and basically do their c
own thing. The City will continue to reach out and work with them. w
c
Mr. Lien explained the transportation element is part of the comprehensive plan update and will include E
traffic studies in the waterfront area. Moving the ferry terminal from its current location to Unocal would
have solve some traffic issues. With the ferry terminal remaining in its current location, the associated
traffic impacts need to be considered. He was uncertain if the state would contribute toward that. Ms. a
McLaughlin assumed there would be a state grant to fund that work, but if the state were to pay for it out
of their ferry operations interest, it would be at a point where there is a project level. The City would want
to know based on future ferry projections what the implication would be to the downtown waterfront
vision before a project is actually proposed.
Council President Olson asked the source of the information that the double tracking would occur on the
east side; she has always heard it would be on the west side. Mr. Bonjukian responded that was from an
interview with a BNSF representative, but they did not see design drawings so it has not been verified.
Mr. Lien said this is a high level review with high level policy recommendations. It does not recommend
any specific projects. There is a lot of environmental analysis in the study; recommendations 4, 5 and 6
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 24
Packet Pg. 117
8.3.a
are related to the environment and marsh. The details will come during visioning, starting at the top and
working down.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed visioning starts at the top, but the CIP/CFP is a very important
budgeting document. She reiterated her concern with the missing link and her offer to serve on a
taskforce.
3. OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT (OPMA) TRAINING (PART 2)
Due to late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting.
Mayor Nelson declared a 5 minute recess at 9:45 p.m.
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO
EXTEND TO 10:15. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson said Councilmember K. Johnson presence is missed. She was very keen on ensuring the
council was punctual and did not stay late and likely would have voted against the motion to extend. Her a
voice would have been very apparent in a lot of the items the council discussed tonight whether it was the
BD2 zone, the Edmonds Waterfront Study, but especially about the marsh. He enjoyed her dedication, her
commitment, her interest in the numbers and the studies and understanding and processing information
before making a commitment or vote. As there are two councilmember with the last name Johnson, he
always had to say their first name along with their last. There is only one Kristiana Johnson; she will be c
missed and will not be forgotten. He was sorry he was unable to say goodbye to her. v
0
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
0
L
Councilmember Paine said she has known Councilmember K. Johnson for as long as she was on the a
planning board and council. They enjoyed going to the Cascadia Art Museum and attending their benefit.
She always enjoyed art, something they shared, as well as grabbing a meal. She appreciated her N
CD
generosity with her time and her social ability. She appreciated her voice on council that was always
trying to elevate and focus on the right thing. The council operates at the 5,000 and the 500,000 foot level c
w
and her voice helped focus on the policy decision. It's hard to accept she is no longer with us. In looking
though old emails, text and photos, she was reminded that it's nice to have people who are dedicated to
Edmonds, and to civil and civic discourse when talking about things. She had the ideal background in E
transportation planning to put her mark on things. She will miss her; she made her mark on the City and
everyone is better for it. a
Councilmember L. Johnson said she did not have the opportunity or pleasure of knowing Councilmember
K. Johnson at the same personal or lengthy professional level. Without a doubt, she served Edmonds with
an admirable level of dedication and there was no question she loved Edmonds with a deep passion and
clearly she will be missed.
Councilmember Tibbott said he was reflecting on some of the lessons he has learned from
Councilmember K. Johnson over the years. They served in different capacities for over 10 years,
beginning with the transportation committee and intersected at the planning board and city council. They
worked together for nearly four years on the Parks and Public Works Committee and got to know each
other well. One thing he learned from her is that process is really important; the only thing more
important than process is procedure and the only thing better than procedure is getting every detail right.
He leaned on her in the PPW Committee to draw out the details and ensure they were giving their best.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 25
Packet Pg. 118
8.3.a
He also learned it doesn't matter how one dresses; it's better to show up with a pure heart and say what's
on your mind. To her it was really important to first have the right heart attitude when expressing
yourself. He also learned a technical word from her, mansplaining, which she did not like it. He will miss
the friendship of his colleague a great deal.
Council President Olson said she was pleased to have this opportunity to say goodbye to her friend and
mentor, Kristiana Johnson. She was at the same time the smartest person in the room and the most
humble and down to earth person, a rare combination. In a world where politics is too often a turf war
rather than a way to deliver for the people, she did not play that game. There needs to be a lot more of
that. She will miss her personally and professionally. Many have talked about how Councilmember K.
Johnson was Edmonds through and through; as a result she had many passions such as art, the 4' Avenue
corridor, Yost Park, Five Corners. A lot of great ideas have been suggested about places where she could
be commemorated, remembered and memorialized; no decision has been made but it will be something
fabulous. Anyone interested in supporting that can make a donation to the City referencing Kristiana
Johnson. The public will be informed when a final plan is formulated.
Councilmember Buckshnis said Edmonds lost two heroes recently, Rose Cantwell and Kristiana Johnson.
Ms. Cantwell was a wonderful person, she drafted Councilmember Buckshnis to serve on the senior
center board in 2009. She was a leader in creating the Waterfront Center, she was kind and a mentor, and
a second mom when her mom passed. She thanked the public for their comments about Councilmember
K. Johnson, agreeing she was a very dedicated public servant. She always put citizens first, she didn't
care about politics or image. To set the record straight, Councilmember Buckshnis said Councilmember
K. Johnson's intent with the July 5, 2022 vote regarding Roe v. Wade was to abstain from the final —
motion. She referred to Councilmember K. Johnson's reasoning on page 78 of the packet or page 18 of 3
the July 5, 2022 minutes where she felt no action should have been taken, that it was divisive issue and 0
not everyone agrees that councilmembers should take a position. If she was here tonight, she would have c
brought that up. Councilmember Buckshnis said she will greatly miss her. 0
0
Councilmember Chen commented a lot has been said about Councilmember K. Johnson's dedication, a
hard work, and being a true public servant. Most of the council have more than one job, from his a
observation she had only one job, the city council. He shared a recent personal experience withcm
N
Councilmember K. Johnson, three weeks ago his wife and son both had COVID. Although she was CD
struggling with her own health, Councilmember K. Johnson called him to ask how he and his family were c
doing which touched his heart and showed what a caring person she was, not only caring for the City as a w
whole at a professional level, but also caring about her coworkers and colleagues. When he was running
for appointment to a city council seat, she aways talked to him. At the beginning he felt like an outsider
and she always made him feel welcome. He will miss her personally and professionally and wished her
rest in peace.
Q
12. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:04 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 19, 2022
Page 26
Packet Pg. 119
8.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Lori Palmer
Background/History
Approval of payroll checks #65150 to #65160 for $11,667.19 dated July 20, 2022, payroll direct deposit
for $647,560.00, benefit checks #65161 through #65166 and wire payments for $634,279.86 for the pay
period July 1, 2022 through July 16, 2022.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
payroll earnings summary 07-01-22 to 07-15-22
benefit checks summary 07-01-22 to 07-15-22
Packet Pg. 120
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,051 (07/01/2022 to 07/15/2022)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
112
ABSENT
NO PAY NON HIRED
36.00
0.00
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
603.25
24,817.84
122
VACATION
VACATION
1,479.24
70,246.55
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
157.00
6,703.16
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
25.00
998.82
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
159.26
7,293.12
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
84.00
4,276.50
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
48.00
1,658.25
134
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE -UNPAID
64.00
0.00
135
SICK
WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEAVE
3.00
44.97
141
BEREAVEMENT
BEREAVEMENT
10.00
530.45
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Day Used
70.50
3,252.62
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
207.95
10,992.50
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
52.00
4,585.75
170
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL BASE PAY
0.00
2,833.32
174
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY
0.00
-300.00
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
15,820.50
670,860.11
194
SICK
Emergency Sick Leave
159.00
6,128.72
195
REGULAR HOURS
ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
96.00
5,721.98
196
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
107.50
5,506.13
197
MISCELLANEOUS
INCLEMENT WEATHER
10.00
345.90
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
151.75
7,484.17
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
42.00
2,198.06
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
15.00
1,361.87
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
461.50
35,084.55
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
16.50
1,242.05
400
MISCELLANEOUS
MISC PAY
0.00
312.69
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
637.93
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
900.59
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
291.51
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
111.50
0.00
603
COMP HOURS
Holiday Comp 1.0
20.00
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
206.75
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 2.0
6.00
0.00
903
MISCELLANEOUS
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
0.00
450.00
07/19/2022 Packet Pg. 121
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,051 (07/01/2022 to 07/15/2022)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
141.63
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
148.12
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstructionist
0.00
93.65
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
187.30
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
308.91
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
280.00
deftat
MISCELLANEOUS
DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
128.50
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
1,075.04
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
727.36
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
554.18
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
6,421.53
firear
MISCELLANEOUS
FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
409.49
fmis
SICK
FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
16.00
407.36
hol
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY
1,359.16
59,310.03
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
275.80
less
MISCELLANEOUS
LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR
0.00
89.60
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
1,009.87
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
527.84
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 9%
0.00
3,829.14
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Longevity 7%
0.00
954.85
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 5%
0.00
968.42
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
259.00
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
388.46
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3%
0.00
1,461.31
Iq6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
319.83
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1.5%
0.00
417.94
Iq8
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 8%
0.00
252.04
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
128.30
pds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
103.70
pfml
ABSENT
Paid Familv Medical Leave
28.00
0.00
pfmp
ABSENT
Paid Familv Medical Unpaid/Sup
5.83
0.00
pfmv
VACATION
Paid Familv Medical Vacation
2.17
84.30
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,654.20
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER
0.00
203.50
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY
0.00
329.16
07/19/2022 Packet Pg. 122
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,051 (07/01/2022 to 07/15/2022)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
203.50
St
REGULAR HOURS
Serqeant Pay
0.00
152.63
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
128.30
vap
VACATION
Vacation Premium
71.50
3,031.90
21,705.86 $964,426.80
Total Net Pay: $659,227.19
8.4.a
c
0
L
Q
0
0
L
0.
Q
Q
07/19/2022 Packet Pg. 123
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,051 - 07/01/2022 to 07/15/2022
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
65161
07/20/2022
bpas
BPAS
5,355.05
65162
07/20/2022
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
5,904.00
65163
07/20/2022
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
698.26
65164
07/20/2022
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
3,516.85
65165
07/20/2022
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
4,569.00
65166
07/20/2022
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
6,514.81
26,557.97
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
3390
07/20/2022
awc
AWC
335,928.12
3393
07/20/2022
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
27,925.64
3394
07/20/2022
us
US BANK
122,242.84
3395
07/20/2022
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N317761
115,615.50
3397
07/20/2022
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
5,680.79
3399
07/20/2022
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
329.00
607,721.89
Grand Totals: 634,279.86
8.4.b
N
m
Direct Deposit
0.00
d
0.00
m
0.00
0.00
c
0.00
f°
0.00
0
L
0.00
a-
0
R
0
L
Direct Deposit
Q-
a
Q
0.00
0.00
N
N
0.00
'n
r
0.00
ti
0.00
0
0
0.00
N
N
0.00
c
0
0.00
E
E
3
N
N
Y
V
N
t
V
N
C
d
7/19/2022 Packet Pg. 124
8.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #253273 through #253373 dated July 21, 2022 for $1,198,584.72 (re -issued
check #253319 $8,237.78) and wire payment of $9,456.81.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 07-21-22
wire 07-14-22
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 07-21-22
Packet Pg. 125
8.5.a
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253273 7/21 /2022 076040 911 SUPPLY I N C
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun r
c
INV-2-17221 EDMONDS PD - SNIFFEN
3 LS UNIFORM SHIRTS
>,
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
284.9 1 a
BLAUER TROUSER
L_
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
114.9� 3
PANT ALTERATIONS
c
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
12.0(
US WHITE SHIRT
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
54.9� a0i
S/S WHITE SHIRT
U
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
44.9� E
2 NAME TAPES
R
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
18.0( 4-
EMBROIDERY FOR SHIRTS
O
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
24.0( >
3 BLAUER PANTS
o
a
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
314.9 1
3 PANT ALTERATIONS
Q
.-
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
36.0( N
3 BLAUER S/S SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
254.9
3 NAME TAPES
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
27.0( E
3 SHIRT EMBROIDERY
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
36.0(
TIE
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
11.0f E
DOUBLE STARS 5/8"
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
26.0(
10.1 % Sales Tax
Q
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
127.2E
INV-2-19490 EDMONDS PD - AC BADGES
50 AC SOFT BADGE PATCHES
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
200.5(
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 126
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 2
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253273
7/21/2022
076040 911 SUPPLY INC
(Continued)
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
20.2',
Total:
1,607.9E
253274
7/21/2022
070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
15-96328
INTERPRETER 1A0674160
INTERPRETER lA0674160
001.000.23.512.51.41.01
170.0(
Total :
170.0(
253275
7/21/2022
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
59534
MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI
MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
94.0(
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
9.8
59708
W WTP: 7/14/22 PEST CONTROL SE
7/14/22 Pest Control Service
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
77.0(
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
&M
Tota I :
188.9E
253276
7/21/2022
064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
146133696
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 122
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
140.8'
146133697
FIRE INSPECTION - CITY HALL
fire inspection - CITY HALL 121 5TH
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
92.5,
Tota I :
233.3:
253277
7/21/2022
071634 ALLSTREAM
18605819
C/A768328
PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
1,354.8 ,
Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929;
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
11.M
Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 127
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253277 7/21/2022 071634 ALLSTREAM
253278 7/21/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC
253279 7/21/2022 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
Tota I :
070722026
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
Total
23140
WWTP: 6/10, 6/15 & 6/24/22 COURI
6/10, 6/15 & 6/24/22 COURIER SER\
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
253280 7/21/2022 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 180853-2273
342759-2273
253281 7/21/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 24691737
6560032362
WI1 1-ZI1411
APA MEMBERSHIP
National and State membership fees-
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
APA MEMBERSHIP
National & State membership dues-
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
Total
PARKS MAINT TEE SHIRTS
PARKS MAINT TEE SHIRTS
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
WWTP:7/13/22 UNIFORMS,TOWEL;
Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 11
8.5.a
Page: 3
Amoun
c
11.0� d
1,377.0° E
�a
a
m
L
�3
30.7.E
c
�a
3.2( Y
33.91 u
t
U
E
2
219.1( U
219.1( p
R
0
a
420.0( Q
N
N
361.0(
781.0(
0
E
576.7�
60.5E E
t
U
m
r
55.5( Q
5.8E
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 128
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 4
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253281 7/21/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
58.2'
Rentals & Prep Charges $40.73+$4.2
>%
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
45.0' a
6560035762
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
L
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
3
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
55.5(
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
5.8( Y
6560035765
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
U
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
27.9' E
10.5% Sales Tax
M
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
2.9< u
6560037642
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
_0
>
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
9.2� o
FLEET DIVISION MATS
a
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
19.1( Q
10.5% Sales Tax
C%4
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
1.5 1
10.5% Sales Tax
N
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.4, o
6560037649
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
E
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6- Z
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1 - aD
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
E
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
6.1' m
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
Q
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 129
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 5
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253281
7/21/2022
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0£
10.5% Sales Tax
E
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.3- a
10.5% Sales Tax
L
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6, .3
10.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
c
0.6,
10.5% Sales Tax
Y
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6, y
10.5% Sales Tax
U
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6, E
10.5% Sales Tax
ii
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.5� ,-
Total:
960.9E
�a
253282
7/21/2022
078237 ARIAS, ADRIAN
70186
INTERPRETER 2A0454756
0
INTERPRETER 2A0454756
a
001.000.23.512.51.41.01
130.0( Q
Total :
130.0( N
N
253283
7/21/2022
078443 ARMSTRONG, THOMAS M
07192022
UPTOWN EVENING MARKET PERF
N
UPTOWN EVENING MARKET PERF
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
0
400.0( N
Total:
400.0( E
.R
253284
7/21/2022
069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC
16149
E22GA/SERVICES THRU 6.24.22
U
E22GA/SERVICES THRU 6.24.22
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
43,500.8E E
Total:
43,500.8E u
m
253285
7/21/2022
074307 BLUE STAR GAS
1349969
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 546.70 G,
r
Q
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 546.70 G,
511.000.77.548.68.34.12
1,617.4,
Total :
1,617.41,
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 130
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 6
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253286
7/21/2022
073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
23937
E22JA/SERVICES THRU 6.26.22
r
E22JA/SERVICES THRU 6.26.22
c
m
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
2,966.0( �%
23938
E22CA/CIP CM THRU 6.25.22
f°
a
E22CA/CIP CM THRU 6.25.22
L
.3
112.000.68.542.30.41.00
5,168.3£
E22CA/CIP CM THRU 6.25.22
c
125.000.68.542.30.41.00
5,995.01
E22CA/CIP CM THRU 6.25.22
Y
126.000.68.542.30.41.00
5,776.5,
23955
ONCALL STMWTR REVIEW THRU E
U
ONCALL STMWTR REVIEW THRU E
E
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
8,075.2E n
23963
EODC/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22
U
EODC/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22
O
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
5,140.0( >
EODC/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22
0
125.000.68.595.33.41.00
4,169.1 < a
Total :
37,290.3: Q
253287
7/21/2022
072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
10666 YOGA
10666 YOGA INSTRUCTION
N
N
10666 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
764.4( c
Total:
764.4( u)
E
253288
7/21/2022
072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE
1072359
E20CB/EOFA.BID DOCS PUBLISHIN
is
E20CB/BID DOCS PUBLISHING
U
112.000.68.542.30.48.00
75.1(
EOFA/BID DOCS PUBLISHING
E
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
56.1 E U
Total:
131.2E
Q
253289
7/21/2022
003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
346343
PM: CRUSHED ROCK
PM: CRUSHED ROCK
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
2,163.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 131
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253289 7/21/2022 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
253290 7/21/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
28847285
28847296
28847297
28847302
28847305
28847309
PO # Description/Account
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total :
C2501 F
contract charges July 2022
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
ENG COPIER JULY 2022
ENG COPIER JULY 2022
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
C/A 572105-1 CONTRACT# 06619
Finance dept copier contract charge
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
IMAGEPRESS LITE C165 SCH# 572
Contract charge imagePRESS Lite C
001.000.31.514.31.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.31.45.00
BLDG COPIER MONTHLY CONTRA(
Bldg copier (SN 3CE08167)-
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
PLANNING MONTLY COPY LEASE
Planning Copier (SN 3CE07934)-
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
CONTRACT #06619 SCH #572105-1
Contract charge - 07/W01/22 - 07/31/
8.5.a
Page: 7
Amoun
c
224.9E m
2,387.9E E,
�a
a
W
L
�3
26.4z
c
�a
2.7E Y
U
m
t
U
253.4E E
26.6"
0
R
227.0z o
a
a
23.8z Q
N
N
302.&
0
31.8(
E
2
U
35.0
m
3.6E E
U
m
35.0, Q
3.6�
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 132
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
253290 7/21/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued)
253291 7/21/2022 078992 CARR, JANICE EILEEN 06022022
253292 7/21/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC BG45257
BH35833
BH53454
SE2203113
253293 7/21/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY CG114775
PO #
Description/Account
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
Total :
Total ;
EPSON DS-530 II DOCUMENT SCAT
Epson DS-530 II document scanner
001.000.67.518.21.35.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.35.00
STARTECH 6U VERTICAL SERVER
Startch 6U vertical wallmounted serve
001.000.64.571.21.35.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.35.00
HP LASERJET PRO M203DW PRINT
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.35.00
HP Laserjet Pro M203dw printer
001.000.64.571.21.35.00
PALO ALTO COMPUTER SERVICES
Professional Services Palo Alto Proje
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
10.5% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
Total
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.5.a
Page: 8
Amoun
c
16.3(
1.7, a
990.35 L
3
c
12.3z Y
12.3z u
t
U
E
2
363.4, U
0
38.1 E
0
L
a
329.4( Q
34.5� N
N
20.1 N
E
192.2£ fd
U
m
5,725.0( E
t
U
543.4(
7,246.45 Q
208.8'
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 133
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 9
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253293
7/21/2022
003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
(Continued)
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
21.9:
CG115164
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
138.1(
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
14.5
Total :
383.4;
253294
7/21/2022
073249 CG ENGINEERING, PLLC
47256
TO 22-02 SERVICES THRU 7.14.22
TO 22-02 SERVICES THRU 7.14.22
001.000.245.963
135.0(
Tota I :
135.0(
253295
7/21/2022
035160 CITY OF SEATTLE
9056920000
WWTP: 5/11-7/12/22 FLOWMETER i
5/11-7/12/22 FLOW METER #87902
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
26.0,
Total :
26.0'
253296
7/21/2022
076914 CM DESIGN GROUP LLC
22030
E20CB/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
E20CB/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
112.000.68.542.30.48.00
8,285.5,
Total :
8,285.5:
253297
7/21/2022
006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
3379291
EOFA/INVITE TO BID
EOFA/INVITE TO BID
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
883.2(
3379735
E20CB/INVITE TO BID
E20CB/INVITE TO BID
112.000.68.542.30.41.00
556.6(
3380162
PLANNING ADVERTISING
Advertisement of Comp Plan Update-
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
71.5!
Total:
1,511.3°
253298
7/21/2022
079002 DONALDSON, MICHAEL P
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 134
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 10
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253298
7/21/2022
079002
DONALDSON, MICHAEL P
(Continued)
JURY TERM I - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
15.8E
Total:
15.8E
253299
7/21/2022
078997
DONELSON, MARK ALAN
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
22.8'
Total :
22.8'
253300
7/21/2022
079031
DOUGLAS & TAMARA MITCHELL
5-04550
#500132494-ND UTILITY REFUND
#500132494-ND Utility refund
411.000.233.000
17.3E
Total:
17.3E
253301
7/21/2022
078494
ECONORTHWEST
25778
DEV SVCS PROFESSIONAL SERVI(
Comprehensive GAP Analysis-
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
5,785.0(
Total:
5,785.0(
253302
7/21/2022
076610
EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
3118
NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - Sl
NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OFFICE - St
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.5(
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
0.4
3132
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.5�
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
0.4£
3152
PM: ADAPTER
PM: ADAPTER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
7.1 £
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
0.7E
3153
PM: MIX CONTAINER, VINYL TUBIN,
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 135
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253302 7/21/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
253303 7/21/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 11
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
PM: MIX CONTAINER, VINYL TUBIN,
c
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
24.8 >,
10.5% Sales Tax
a
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.6" L
3155
PM: PARTS
3
PM: PARTS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
c
21.31
10.5% Sales Tax
Y
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.2z
3156
PM: MOUNT, RECEIVER PIN
U
PM: MOUNT, RECEIVER PIN
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
74.5E n
10.5% Sales Tax
,-
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
7.& _0
3161
PM: ADAPTERS, REMOVAL TOOL, I
PM: ADAPTERS, REMOVAL TOOL, I
o
L
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
28.9z a
10.5% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
3.0z c,4
3163
PM:ADAPTERS
PM:ADAPTERS
N
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
7.9E o
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
0.8z •�
3167
PM: SOCKET SET
PM: SOCKET SET
+%
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
27.9E
10.5% Sales Tax
E
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.9z m
Total :
223.1; Q
5-00080 IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE
IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 56.3E
5-10351 INTERURBAN TRAIL
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 136
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 12
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253303 7/21/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued)
INTERURBAN TRAIL
E,
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
61.2z
6-00025
MARINA BEACH PARK SPRINKLER
f°
a
MARINA BEACH PARK
L
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
421.3( .3
6-00200
FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS
FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
858.2E Y
6-00410
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPF
U
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPF
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
502.6E E
6-00475
ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS
R
ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,777.7E
6-01250
CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER
_0
>
CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER
o
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
362.9E a
6-01275
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
Q
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2,147.4E
6-01280
CITY PARK SPRAY PARK
C�
CITY PARK SPRAY PARK
r-
0
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
3,029.3z
6-02125
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL
2
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
412.0, +:
6-02727
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER
(D
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
323.5 , m
6-02730
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I
Q
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
323.5
6-02735
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
2,826.2z
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 137
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253303 7/21/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 13
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
6-02736
FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH Ab
c
FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH A�
E
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
13.5, a
6-02737
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
L
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
3
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
504.5"
6-02738
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA
Y
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
440.2.E uw
6-02745
VETERANS PLAZA
VETERANS PLAZA
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
352.9E 'm
6-02825
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / �
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / �
O
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
4,700.2E >
6-02875
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF
o
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF
a
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
23.7.E Q
6-02885
DOWNTOWN RESTROOM
N
DOWNTOWN RESTROOM
N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
545.9E
6-02900
FAC SPRINKLER
0
FAC SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
581.2E .
6-02925
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
2,688.71 (D
6-03000
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI
E
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
m
678.7E
6-03275
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI
Q
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 217.1(
6-03575 MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER
MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 138
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 14
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253303 7/21/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
408.2(
6-04127
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST :
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST :
a
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
1,101.91 L
6-04128
FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TI•
3
FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TF
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
13.5 1
6-04400
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
Y
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
761.1.' u
6-04425
SEAVIEW PARK
E
SEAVIEW PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
_M
795.9< Z
6-04450
SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER
O
SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
493.6' o
6-05155
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
a
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
Q
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
242.7E N
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
N
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
922.4E N
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
c
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
922.4E N
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
E
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
922.4E U
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH :
+:
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
922.4E (D
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
E
t
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
922.4 1 m
6-05156
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
Q
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
1.7(
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
6.4z
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 139
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253303 7/21/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
253304
253305
7/21/2022 075200 EDUARDO ZALDIBAR
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
6-06040
6-07775
6-08500
6-08525
8583/2022
7/21/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR224555
AR224565
8.5.a
Page: 15
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
d
E,
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
6.4z
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
f°
a
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
6.4z L
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
.3
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
6.4z
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21
ea
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
6.4< Y
5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGF
5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGF
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
56.3f E
MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER
ii
MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
444.7, _0
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
>
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
P
L
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,718.6� a
YOST POOL
Q
YOST POOL
N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
336.2(
Total :
34,869.35 N
0
E20CE/SPA TRANSLATION SVC
N
E20CE/SPA TRANSLATION SVC
E
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
65.0( TU
Total :
65.0(
WWTP: 6/16-7/15/22 OVERAGE CH)
E
6/16-7/15/22 OVERAGE CHARGE
t
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
60.0�
10.5% Sales Tax
Q
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
6.3"
CUST# MK5533 C57501 3AP07496 C
Meter charges 06/16/22 - 07/15/22 Bt
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
6.7(
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 140
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
253305 7/21/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued)
AR224568
AR224844
AR224845
PO # Description/Account
Meter charges 06/16/22 - 07/15/22
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
P&R COPIER USAGE: C57501: S/N
P&R COPIER USAGE: C57501: accot
001.000.64.571.22.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.22.45.00
PM COPIER USAGE: C2571F: S/N 3(
PM COPIER USAGE: C2571F: Accou
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
P&R COPIER USAGE: C2571F: S/N
P&R COPIER USAGE: C2571F: Acco
001.000.64.571.22.45.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.22.45.00
Total
253306 7/21/2022 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0166794-IN ACCT 11847 - EDMONDS PD
2 ACOP FLAT BADGES
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
2 LEATHER CASES
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
PACKING/INSURANCE
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.10.24.00
Total
253307 7/21/2022 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 176049 E21 FC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
E21 FC/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
8.5.a
Page: 16
Amoun
c
m
29.4( E,
�a
a
3.7� L
3
c
68.5, 0
7.2( y
t
U
E
53.9- n
U
4-
5.6E 0
R
0
L
63.6( a
El
6.6f c,4
311.91
N
0
236.0( .
�a
U
66.0(
10.5( E
U
m
16.0(
328.5( Q
4,672.5(
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 141
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
253307 7/21/2022 075136 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC (Continued)
253308 7/21/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH956343
EDH957307
EDH958319
253309 7/21/2022 072493 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC 174127
253310 7/21/2022 076340 FIRSTTWO INC
253311 7/21/2022 078917 GALLAGHER, BRUCE
253312 7/21/2022 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL
1725
7/12/22 HMP
021409847
Description/Account
Total
EOFA/INVITE TO BID
EOFA/INVITE TO BID
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
E20CB/INVITE TO BID
E20CB/INVITE TO BID
112.000.68.542.30.41.00
CITY ORDINANCES 4267,4268 & 42,
City ordinances #4267, #4268 & #42E
001.000.31.514.31.41.40
Total
JUL-2022 SUPPORT SERVICES
Jul-2022 Support Services
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
10.5% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Total
ACCT 294 - EDMONDS PD
FIRST2 FULL AGENCY YRLY RENE\
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
Total
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT
Agreement for Presentation Services:
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Total
ACCT 1001074529 - EDMONDS PD
REEBOK BOOTS - HAUGHIAN
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
8.5.a
Page: 17
Amoun
4,672.5(
d
E
�a
a
354.3,
L
3
199.5,
U
48.1E t
602.0( U
2
U
0
265.0(
0
27.8' a
292.W Q
N
N
2,400.0(
0
252.0( E
2,652.0E 'M
750.0( t
750.0(
r
Q
98.4(
5.0(
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 142
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
253312
7/21/2022
002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL
(Continued)
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
021515539
EDMONDS PD - STRUM
ZEPHYR BOOTS - STRUM
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
Total
253313
7/21/2022
079005 GUENTHER, MARK
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
Tota I :
253314
7/21/2022
078923 HKA GLOBAL INC
0000004
WWTP: 6/1-6/30/22 PROF. SERVICE
6/1-6/30/22 PROF. SERVICES FOR
423.100.76.594.35.41.00
Tota I :
253315
7/21/2022
061013 HONEY BUCKET
0552869468
SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET
SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0552869469
MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED
MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0552869470
WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I
WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY 1
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0552869471
HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC
HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0552869472
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET
8.5.a
Page: 18
Amoun
c
m
10.8( E,
�a
a
196.8( 3
c
5.0(
21.1� y
337.2E U
E
2
U
4"
12.31 o
12.3'
0
L
a
a
Q
12,282.5(
12,282.5( CN
N
0
120.4E E
1,514.1,
m
E
t
U
240.3E
Q
346.0(
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 143
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253315 7/21/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET
253316 7/21/2022 078466 HUSTLE BASKETBALL LLC
253317 7/21/2022 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
253318 7/21/2022 079022 INFRAWEST INC
253319 7/21/2022 073518 INNOVYZE LLC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 19
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
r
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
c
644.9�
0552869473
PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE
PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE
f°
a
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
120.4E L
0552869474
YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET
3
YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
439.6(
Total :
3,425.9E Y
U
10783 BASKETBALL
10783 BASKETBALL SUMMER CAM
a)
10783 BASKETBALL SUMMER CAM
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
U
1,274.0( •ii
Total:
1,274.0( U
4-
0
3572018
COPY PAPER, PACKAGING TAPE
R
Copy paper - Qty 6, Packaging tape -
o
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
413.2z a
10.5% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
43.3,
3577393
ENG.STANDING DESK - PAT JOHNS
cN.i
ENG.STANDING DESK - PAT JOHNS
N
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
2,530.0( r�
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
265.6E E
Total:
3,252.Z R
ENG2022-0224
PERMIT FEE REFUND
ENG2022-0224-
aD
E
001.000.257.620
370.0(
Total :
370.0(
Q
Q-121264
INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL
INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL
423.000.75.535.80.49.20 2,325.0(
INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 144
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 20
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253319
7/21/2022
073518 INNOVYZE LLC
(Continued)
422.000.72.531.90.49.20
2,325.0(
INFOCARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL
421.000.74.534.80.49.20
2,805.0(
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.20
244.1,
10.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.20
244.1,
10.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.20
294.5,
Total :
8,237.71
253320
7/21/2022
076917 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
W3Y0200014
WWTP: FOR 5/28-7/1/22 SERVICES
FOR 5/28-7/1/22 SERVICES
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
964.0(
Tota I :
964.0(
253321
7/21/2022
078994 KANE, JANICE L
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
11.5,
Total:
11.5,
253322
7/21/2022
075265 KBA INC
3006854
EOMA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
EOMA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
332.000.64.594.76.41.00
27,082.0,
EOMA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
125.000.64.594.76.41.00
8,089.4,
Tota I :
35,171.41
253323
7/21/2022
072101 KCR MEDIA GROUP INC
12708
E20CE/KRN TRANSLAND AD PUBL
E20CE/KRN TRANSL AND AD PUBL
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
390.0(
Total :
390.0(
253324
7/21/2022
078999 KEPPLER RAMER, VALERIE ANN
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 145
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 21
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
253324
7/21/2022
078999
KEPPLER RAMER, VALERIEANN
(Continued)
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
13.2E
Total:
13.2f
253325
7/21/2022
067568
KPG PSOMAS INC
185047
E71DC/SERVICES THRU 6.2.22
E71DC/SERVICES THRU 6.2.22
112.000.68.595.61.41.00
768.5E
E71DC/SERVICES THRU 6.2.22
125.000.68.595.61.41.00
234.8-
E71DC/SERVICES THRU 6.2.22
126.000.68.595.61.41.00
363.5(
E71DC/SERVICES THRU 6.2.22
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
0.6�
Total:
1,367.51
253326
7/21/2022
078998
KUBALANZA, ANN FRANCES
06022022
JURY TERM I - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
26.0E
Total :
26.01
253327
7/21/2022
078471
LEMM, KEVIN
10662 TAEKWON-DO
10662 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI`
10662 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI`
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
799.6f
Total :
799.61
253328
7/21/2022
075159
LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER
August CIGNA 2022
AUGUST 2022 CIGNA PREMIUMS
August 2022 CIGNA Premiums
811.000.231.550
13,405.11
Total:
13,405.1
253329
7/21/2022
073603
LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC
Jul-2022
07-2022 LEGALS FEES
07-2022 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.41.41.00
53,953.0(
Total:
53,953.0(
253330
7/21/2022
076001
LUCIE R BERNHEIM, ATTYAT LAW
995
CONFLICT COUNSEL 1A0635947
CONFLICT COUNSEL 1 A0635947
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 146
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 22
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
253330
7/21/2022
076001 LUCIE R BERNHEIM, ATTYAT LAW
(Continued)
001.000.39.515.93.41.00
700.0(
Tota I :
700.0(
253331
7/21/2022
078951 MCARTHUR, ELIZABETH
APRIL 2022
RECORDS TRAINING PER DIEM MC
RECORDS TRAINING PER DIEM AP
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
238.5(
Total :
238.5(
253332
7/21/2022
075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA
10797 FELDENKRAIS
10797 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI
10797 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
75.0E
Tota I :
75.0f
253333
7/21/2022
078974 MIRANTE, JOHN
PLN2021-0033
DEV SVCS - PERMIT FEE REFUND
Refund of Permit Fees-
001.000.257.620
8,250.0(
Total:
8,250.0(
253334
7/21/2022
072746 MURRAYSMITH INC
20-2775.01-15
E21GA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
E21GA/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
5,215.0(
20-2967.00-13
EOJB/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
EOJB/SERVICES THRU 6.30.22
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
11,507.8E
Total:
16,722.8E
253335
7/21/2022
078847 NEWNUM, BETSY
10669 YOGA
10669 YOGA INSTRUCTION
10669 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
85.8(
Total :
85.8(
253336
7/21/2022
075694 PACIFIC SOUND DESIGN
07192022
PMT 1 - 2022 UPTOWN EVENING M
PMT 1 - 2022 UPTOWN EVENING M
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
2,100.0(
Total :
2.100.0(
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 147
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253337 7/21/2022 078995 PEABODY, AARON GARETH
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
06022022
253338 7/21/2022 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT HPC062922
253339 7/21/2022 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC
253340 7/21/2022 078781 PETTIT, MAUREEN C
253341 7/21/2022 078952 PHONXAYLINKHAM, PHAIVANH
44470
44636
10674 10672 CLOGGING
APRIL 2022
253342 7/21/2022 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 1120477
253343 7/21/2022 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
03870
PO # Description/Account
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
Total
PROF SERVICES - PLANNING DEP-
Historical Preservation Commission-
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
Total
PRE PAID EVALUATIONS - EDMON[
50 PRE PAID PERSONNEL EVALUA
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
JUNE 2022 - EDMONDS PD
JUNE PERSONNEL EVALUATION
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
Total
10674 10672 CLOGGING CLASS IN:
10674 CLOGGING CLASS INSTRUC
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
10672 CLOGGING CLASS INSTRUC
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
RECORDS TRAINING PER DIEM - P
RECORDS TRAINING PER DIEM - 4,
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
Total
SEWER - SHIPPING
SEWER - SHIPPING
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
Total
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR
8.5.a
Page: 23
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 148
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 24
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
253343
7/21/2022
029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
(Continued)
422.000.72.531.90.41.50
4,392.3,1
Total:
4,392.3°
253344
7/21/2022
079020 PRECISION LANGUAGE SERVICES
69634
INTERPRETER 2A0114333
INTERPRETER 2A0114333
001.000.23.512.51.41.01
130.0(
Total :
130.0(
253345
7/21/2022
046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
200000704821
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
949.8"
Total :
949.81
253346
7/21/2022
075965 RISDON, DANIELLE
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
18.7E
Total:
18.7f
253347
7/21/2022
065769 SADORUS, JEFFREY
UMPIRE JULY5
SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF
SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
74.0(
UMPIRE JUNE
SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF
SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
222.0(
Tota I :
296.0(
253348
7/21/2022
078993 SCOFIELD, JOHN R
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
23.9E
Total :
23.91
253349
7/21/2022
079004 SCOTT, AARON LANE
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
13.5
Total :
13.51
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 149
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
253350 7/21/2022 071159 SEATTLE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY 7/17/22 HMP
253351 7/21/2022 079023 SELENA FITCH
253352 7/21/2022 036955 SKY NURSERY
253353 7/21/2022 071157 SLABJACK NW LLC
253354 7/21/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
PO # Description/Account
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT
Agreement for Presentation Services:
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Total
ENG2022-0101 PERMIT FEE REFUND
Applicant charge std fee for RW perrr
001.000.257.620
Total
T-2057836 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
Total
61021.12124 WWTP: FIX CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
FIX CONCRETE DRIVEWAY RAMP
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
200260271 YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
200496834 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
200723021 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201184538 HICKMAN PARK
HICKMAN PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
8.5.a
Page: 25
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 150
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253354 7/21/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
253355
253356
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
201431236
201441755
201790003
202250627
202289450
202540647
204425847
220547574
223283185
7/21/2022 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE Aug-22
7/21/2022 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L149325
8.5.a
Page: 26
PO # Description/Account Amoun
c
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OILY
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OILYE
E
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
25.2< a
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
L
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
3
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
142.8E
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
Y
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
24.4� y
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
24.4� 'm
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
O
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
69.2( >
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191
o
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191
a
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
23.0( Q
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
N
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
N
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
54.5< N
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
0
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
76.3, .
UPTOWN CITY HALL - 23632 HIGHV
Uptown City Hall - 23632 Highway 99
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
98.9, (D
Total:
2,055.55 E
U
AUG-2022 FIRE SERVICES CONTR)
Aug-2022 Fire Services Contract Pay
Q
001.000.39.522.20.41.50
784,987.6E
Total :
784,987.61
06-2022 AUDIT FEES
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 151
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 27
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
253356
7/21/2022
039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
(Continued)
06-2022 Audit Fees
001.000.39.514.20.41.50
5,921.1(
06-2022 Audit Fees
111.000.68.543.30.41.50
592.1
06-2022 Audit Fees
421.000.74.534.80.41.50
1,776.3<
06-2022 Audit Fees
422.000.72.531.90.41.50
1,776.3<
06-2022 Audit Fees
423.000.75.535.80.41.50
1,776.3,
Total :
11,842.2(
253357
7/21/2022
078991 STRONG, CAROLYN ELAINE
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
11.&
Total:
11.61
253358
7/21/2022
079003 TERWILLINGER, GARRETT CLYDE
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
24.2'
Tota I :
24.2'
253359
7/21/2022
071666 TETRATECH INC
51914837
EOFA/SERVICES THRU 4.22.22
EOFA/SERVICES THRU 4.22.22
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
29,830.0(
Total :
29,830.0(
253360
7/21/2022
072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY
136916
COPIER LEASE
Monthly base charge for Dev Svcs-
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
192.5(
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
20.2'
Total :
212.7'
253361
7/21/2022
079017 TONG, JESSIE
6/27 ATTENDANT
6/27 OUTDOOR VOLLEYBALL ATTE
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 152
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 28
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253361
7/21/2022
079017 TONG, JESSIE
(Continued)
6/27 OUTDOOR VOLLEYBALL ATTE
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
52.5(
Total:
52.5(
253362
7/21/2022
076946 TSERENDAVAA, ARIUNTULGA
70088
INTERPRETER 7Z0811965
INTERPRETER 7Z0811965
001.000.23.512.51.41.01
130.0(
Total :
130.0(
253363
7/21/2022
079000 TURNBULL, ANNE MICHELLE
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
27.2E
Total:
27.2E
253364
7/21/2022
076823 TYR TACTICAL LLC
2072302
EDMONDS PD
TYR OPEN TOP MAG
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
33.9(
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
7.9(
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
4.11
Total :
46.0 ,
253365
7/21/2022
077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER
278704
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
3,474.9(
278705
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
1,995.1
278706
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
3,780.5(
278707
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
3,909.2(
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 153
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 29
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253365
7/21/2022
077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER
(Continued)
278708
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
3,909.2(
278709
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
3,909.2(
279344
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
1,281.4,
279353
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
PARKS - PLAYGROUND WOODCHII
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
4,691.1 ,
Total:
26,950.91
253366
7/21/2022
078996 WADE, KAREN LEE
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
17.0,
Total :
17.0:
253367
7/21/2022
075155 WALKER MACY LLC
P3282.04-50
EOMA/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22
EOMA/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22
332.000.64.594.76.41.00
8,366.7(
EOMA/SERVICES THRU 6.25.22
125.000.64.594.76.41.00
2,499.1'.
Total :
10,865.8°
253368
7/21/2022
079001 WALSH, ROSEMARY LYNN
06022022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
JURY TERM 1 - 6/2022
001.000.23.512.51.49.20
26.0(
Total :
26.01
253369
7/21/2022
075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
12793583CR
FAC MAINT - RETURN
FAC MAINT - RETURN
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
-16.1(
F Freight
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 154
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253369 7/21/2022 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
253370
253371
7/21/2022 073552 W ELCO SALES LLC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
12826737
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Freight
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
12830147
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Total:
8228
UTILITY BILLING - WINDOW & RETI
UTILITY BILLING - #9 RETURN QTY
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
UTILITY BILLING - #9 RETURN QTY
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
UTILITY BILLING - #9 RETURN QTY
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
Total
7/21/2022 073018 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 65107415
PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER
PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.5.a
Page: 30
Amoun
c
12.9E E
-3.0E a
3
21.1(
12.9,1 Y
U
m
3.5E
E
M
20.1( u
0
2.1-
27.7d o
a
a
Q
N
293.91 N
N
293.9z c
294.0( .
�a
U
30.8,
aD
30.8E E
U
m
30.8
974.51 Q
367.3E
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 155
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
253371 7/21/2022 073018 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC
253372 7/21/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.a
Page: 31
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
r
10.5% Sales Tax
c
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
38.5�
>,
Total:
405.9,
a
m
253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
3
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
6.4,
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE'
Y
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
24.4E
u
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
24.4E
E
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE'
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
24.4E
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE'
O
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
24.4E >
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE'
o
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
24.4E a
425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
Q
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
N
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
38.7' N
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
38.7( c
425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC ALARM, FAX,
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
18.5z U
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
92.6, (D
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
E
t
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
77.8z m
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
Q
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
77.8z
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
103.7�
425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 156
vchlist
07/21 /2022 9:55:16AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account
253372 7/21/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER (Continued)
CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
425-775-7865 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
Total:
253373 7/21/2022 079021 ZOOM DRAIN ENG2022-0271 PERMIT FEE REFUND
Permit fee refund. Sewer damage ca
001.000.257.620
Total
101 Vouchers for bank code: usbank Bank total
101 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers
8.5.a
Page: 32
Amoun
c
150.0' >,
�a
a
77.2( 3
804.0f
c
U
m
150.0( �
150.0( E
1,206,822.5( 2
4-
0
1,206,822.5(
0
L
Q
Q
N
N
N
O
N
E
M
V
C
d
E
t
V
f0
r
El
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 157
8.5.b
vchlist
07/15/2022 9:00:19AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7142022 7/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page:
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
0747 PW CC - 07/06/2022
AMAZON - SHARPIES
E
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
22.3E M
AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES
Q'
m
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
48.9 1 •3
AMAZON - CEILING TILES FOR PUE
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
244.3,
WALMART - SUPPLIES
w
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
53.0z cYi
AMAZON - SUPPLIES
t
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
40.9z U
AMAZON - FAC MAINT SUPPLIES L,
E
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
92.6£ 6
AMAZON - SUPPLIES
p
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
23.9( Ta
GREEN RIVER - BACKFLOW PRO C
p
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
L
145.0( 0-
ITUNES MONTHLY CHARGE FOR IC
a
Q
001.000.65.518.20.49.00
0.9� N
1937 FLEET CC - 7/06/2022
N
WA DOL - E194FM REGISTRATION
r
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
64.0( c
GOOD TO GO - TOLL FEES
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
7.7E .3
HARBOR FREIGHT - E194FM - ROL
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
685.0E y
JACOBSEN MARINE - M-16 -PARTS
E
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
27.1E U
DEALERSHIP GLASS - UNIT 437 GL
f°
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
785.7£ Q
AMAON - FLEET ENGINE HEATER
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
198.8�
UPS STORE - SHIPPING FORKLIFT
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
11.91
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 158
vchlist
07/15/2022 9:00:19AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7142022 7/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.b
Page: 2
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
FREIGHTLINER - UNIT 47 - PARTS/
c
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
247.3'
E
WA DOL - E197FM REGISTRATION
R
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
64.0(
Q-
EMERALD CITY HARLEY - UNIT 928
L
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
979.9£
3
GOOD TO GO - TOLL FEES
c
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
2.7E
y
2892
HP 134X TONER CARTRIDGE
Amazon - HP 134x Toner cartridge
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
88.2£
2985
WWTP: PO 860 PADDLE
E
PO 860 PADDLE
f°
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
29.6E
o
10.5% Sales Tax
70
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
3.1'
o
3732
3732 RICH LINDSAY CREDIT CARD
a
FASTSIGNS: FLOWER PROGRAM E
C
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
4210
AWC CONFERENCE
N
AWC annual conference accommoda
v
001.000.21.513.10.43.00
333.3(
r
ti
AWC annual conference parking
a�
001.000.21.513.10.43.00
47.2E
.3
4286
4286 SHANNON BURLEY CREDIT C
NAME BADGES: CEMETERY BOARI
130.000.64.536.20.49.00
35.5E
E
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: JOURI
U
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
9.91
2
AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: D( Q
001.000.64.571.26.31.00 229.7£
AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: BI
001.000.64.571.26.31.00 23.8z
AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: B/
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 159
vchlist
07/15/2022 9:00:19AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7142022 7/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.b
Page: 3
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.26.31.00
166.0: c
AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: S1
E
E
001.000.64.571.26.31.00
89.4t
4697 PARADE
Q-
parade supplies
L_
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
312.8' 3
postage for retirement paperweight
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
9.2: y
desk drawer organizers
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
20.6E 41
canva subscription
U
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
12.9,1 .
parade decorations
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
20.9£ o
parade supplies/decorations
�a
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
77.3' o
Juneteenth flag
a
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
15.3E Q
bags
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
36.4.1 N
5585 5585 JESSE CURRAN CREDIT CAR
d
r
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: RAIN GEP
ti
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
CD
57.2E
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: TOOLS
W
3
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
39.7'. . .
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GARDEN
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
a�
116.7( E
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: BABY CH)
U
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
303.7,
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: SPRAY B(
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 49.6,
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GLOVES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 54.1 f
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: VESTS
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 160
vchlist
07/15/2022 9:00:19AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7142022 7/14/2022 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.b
Page: 4
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
40.8 c
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: PACKAGII
m
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
34.4£
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: VESTS
Q-
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
33.1:.L
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: FUNNEL
3
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.4� c
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: PRUNING
N
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
149.8£
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: BABY CH)
m
t
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
297.4(
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: EAR PLU(
E
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
24.2£
5585 CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEMS - P
o
CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEMS - A
Fa
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
-303.7, c
5593 IIMC, SNO CO AUDITOR RECORDIN
Q.
Snohomish Co Auditor - recordings
a
Q
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
"
60.0(cm
Snohomish Co Auditor - recordings
N
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
60.0( 4
r
Snohomish Co Auditor - recordings
ti
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
CD
615.5(
Snohomish Co Parking garage
aa)
L
001.000.31.514.31.49.00
3.0(
Amazon - copy paper
001.000.31.514.31.31.00
40.8 , E
Snohomish Co Auditor - recordings
001.000.62.558.60.49.00 410.0( 26
International Institute of Municipal Q
001.000.31.514.31.49.00 240.0(
5919 5919 FRANCES CHAPIN CREDIT CI
AMAZON: EAC SUPPLIES: TABLECI
117.100.64.573.20.31.00 15.4E
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 161
vchlist
07/15/2022 9:00:19AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8.5.b
Page: 5
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
7142022 7/14/2022 062693 US BANK (Continued)
5923
CS/ECON DEV CREDIT CARD JUNE
c
CREATIVE DISTRICT - BUSINESS &
E
E
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
1,092.8E
DIVERSITY COMMISSION 4TH OF J
Q-
001.000.61.557.20.49.00
35.0( .L
HWY 99 OFFICE - TOASTER OVEN
3
001.000.60.557.20.49.00
88.3� c
6459
6459 ANGIE FESER CREDIT CARD
M
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: PENS
N
Y
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
10.4t
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: EXPAP
U
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
32.5( .
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: FILE F
f°
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
17.8( o
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: FILE C
Fa
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
17.1 , o
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: EXPAP
0-
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
22.4' Q
AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: BINDE
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
7.2£ N
6842
WEBCAMS, SPEAKERS, WIRELES:
r
Amazon - 1080p Webcam w/microph�
ti
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
CD
249.6E
8111
8111 MICHELE PARKER CREDIT CA
L
GLASSWORKS: PRESCHOOL SUPF
3
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
11.0E
8842
GFOA FUNDAMENTALS VIRTUAL R
E
E
GFOA- Fundamentals Virtual Forum
U
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
111.7E 2
Total : 9,456.8' Q
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total : 9,456.8'
1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 9,456.8'
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 162
8.5.b
vchlist
07/15/2022 9:00:19AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Page:
Amoun
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 163
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Protect Title
175th St. SW Slope StabilizatioGA
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
e Pm
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
Engineerinq
Protect
Number
E21FB
Protect
Accounting Funding
Number
c560
EBGA c516 SWR
EBFC
EBJA c523 WTR
-affic Calming
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES E
019 Waterline Overlay i043
a
2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR
3
1020 Guardrail Installations
'a
2020 Overlay Program
EOCA
i042
STR
c
w
E0DB
STR jA
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
EODA
s024
STR
s
ffic Calming
E
co
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
E0A13
i047
STR
c
1020 Waterline Overlay
0
2021 Guardrail Installations
E21AB
i057
STR
a
1C
a
a
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
E21 DB
i062
STR
N
2021 Sewer E21 CC SWR .
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
E21 CD
i061
STM
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
STFO
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
E21CB
i059
WTR
kL022 Guardrail Program
i073
2022 Overlay Program
E22CA
i063
STR
072
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
E22CC
i065
STR
22 Signal Upgrade
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
E22CD
i066
STR
022 Traffic Calming Program
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
E22NB
s030
UTILITIES
L22 Waterline Overlay Program
E22CB
1064
2023 Overlay Program
E23CA
i074
STR
2023 Sew Pr
E23CC
i076
2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM
erl rog
220th Adaptive EBAB i028 STR
6th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 164
PROJECT NUMBERS (By
Project Title)
Engineering
Proiect
Project Title
Proiect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
EBCA
i029
STR
76th Ave W at 212th S=Intersection Improvements
E1CA
c368
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
EBCC
i031
STR
aCurb Ramp
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
E9DA
i040
STR
_7
allinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
c
E
E
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
EODC
i050
STR
0
a
Ltywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
3
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
E7DC
i026
STR
V
c
Protected/Pe rr psive
E6AB iy
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
EOMA
c551
PRK
s
E
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
ESJB
c482
WTR
M
ayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
0
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
E4MB
c443
FAC
0
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
a
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
E21JB
c561
WTR
Q
�ay Walkway 9th Ave
1DA
TR
N
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
ESKA
c473
WTR
T_
N
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalizati
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
= Mlle Creek Restoration
Minor Sidewalk Program
PDES (Students Saving Salmon)
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
1VD Slope Repair & Stabilization
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvem
r
Perrinville Creek Recovery Stu
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
Water Utility Replace
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacemeni
E22CE
i067 STR
E4FD
c436 STM
E4GC
c461 SWR
B
a W S�
E6DD
i017 STR
E7FG
11mo
EONA
s025 GF
m105
ents E20FC
c552 STM
028
E22GA
c566 SW R
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
E21JA c558 WTR
EOFB c547 STM
Revised 6/29/2022
Packet Pg. 165
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Protect Title
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
I Sewer Replace
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
Engineerinq
Proiect
Number
F21FD
Protect
Accounting Funding
Number
c563
E22FA c567 STM
OG
E21 GA c559 SW R
W Concrete Regrade & Drainage Sou
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
E21GB
c562
SWR
c
E
E
eaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
EOFA
STM
a
SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th_
E22CG
i069
STR
3
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
E20CE
Standard Details Updates
ESNA
solo
UTILITIES
c
Emwater AL AL
E6FD
Sunset Walkway Improvements
E1 DA
c354
STR
s
E
nds reserve Policies Study
s029
co
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
E7MA
c544
PRK
c
Eaterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
>
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
E7MA
m103
PRK
0
a
Pillow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
47F
c435
Q
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
EOJB
s026
WTR
E22JB
m160
WTR jd
E21 FA
c556
PRK
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 166
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #)
Engineering Protect
Protect Title Protect Accounting Funding
Number
Number
L020 Guardrail Installations
EOAA
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
EOAB
i047
STIR
EM
i048
STIR Js
2020 Overlay Program
EOCA
i042
STIR
020 Waterline Overlay
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
EODA
s024
STIR
c
E
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
STR
0
a
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
EODC
i050
STIR
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
�
EOFA
, c546
STM
3
'a
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
E0F13
c547
STM
c
w
al Sewer Replace
iA
d
s
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
EOJA
c549
WTR
NOR
E
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
co
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
EOMA
c536
PRK
c
livic Center Playfield (Construction)
EOMA
c551
c°
0
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
EONA
s025
GF
a
F6th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
i CA=
c368
STIR
Q
Sunset Walkway Improvements
E1 DA
c354
STIRN
cm
76th Ave Overlay (196th
6#
N
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
E20CE
i055
STIR
ti
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction provements
c552
0
2021 Traffic Calming _
E21AA
i056
STIR
3
z
kQ21 Guardrail Installations
a
2021 Overlay Program
E21 CA
i051
STIR
2021 Waterline Overlav Program-�w
E21 CB
N
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
E21 CC
i060
SWR
Stormwater Overlay Program
0
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
E21 DA
i058
STIR
LL
F021 Pedestrian Task Force
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
E21 FA
c556
PRK
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
Q
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM
Phase 3 Storm Repla
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 STM
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c559 rsvP_
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SWR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project Elmwvv—Tw
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 167
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #)
8.5.c
Engineering
Protect Title Protect
Number
Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB
2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA
2022 Traffic Calming Program
2022 Guardrail Progrw
Protect
Accounting Funding
Number
c561 WTR
i070 STIR
E22AB i071 STIR
E22AC
2022 Overlay Program
E22CA
i063
STIR
_7
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
E22CB
i064
c
E
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
E22CC
i065
STIR
M
a
�022 Stormwater Overlay Program
E22CD
Xio T"
3
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th)
E22CE
i067
STIR
V
�Iwy 99 Revitalizatig0 Stage 4 (224th-220th)
S
c
`°
N
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
E22CG
i069
STIR
22 Pedestrian Safety
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration
s
E
E22FA c567 STM co
E22FB c
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
E22GA
c566 SWR
Lhase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
c565 r WTI
a
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
E22JB
m160 WTR
Q
�s res Gies
E22NA
UTILITIES
cc
2022 Utilitv Rate and GFC Study
E22NB
s030 UTILITIES
N
23 Overlay Progra
2023 Waterline Overlay Program
2023 Sewer Overlay Program
2023 Stormwater Overlay Program
Will &reek Daylighting/&onds Marsh Restoration
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
�et Stormw
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab'
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
standard Details Updates'
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
otected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
Minor Sidewalk Program
tormwater Comp pdate
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
E23CB i075 WTR
E23CC
E23CD i077 STM
E4FD c436
E4GC c461
E5GB s011
STM
STM
SWR
SWR
E51KA
c473
WTR
solo
UTILITIES
E6AA
s014
STIR
E6DD
i017
STIR
E6GB
c488
SWR
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 168
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #)
Engineering
Protect
Protect Title
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Ltywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
E7DC
i026
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
E71FA
m105
STM
NPDE Saving Salmon)
2019 Waterline Replacement
E7JA
c498
WTR
aterfront Development & Restoration (Design) ,
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction
E7MA c544
Faterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - DesignJW m103
220th Adaptive E8AB i028
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements E8CA , i029
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
E8CC
i031
Ramps
E8DB
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
E8FC
c525
019 Sewerline Replacement Project
E8GA
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
E8JA
c523
1019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
2019 Traffic Calming
E9AA
i038
F019 Waterline Overla
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
E9DA
i040
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
PRK E
mrom
a
STIR
3
STIR
c
w
STIR
d
STM
s
SWR
E
co
WTR
c
UTILITIES
>
STIR
0
a
a
WTR Q
STIR
E9FA s022 STM
E9MA c502 FAC
Revised 6/29/2022
Packet Pg. 169
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #)
8.5.c
Engineering
Project
Protect Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Number
Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration
E22FB
a157
Sunset Walkway Improvements
E1 DA
c354
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
E1CA
c368
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
E4FC
c435
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
E4FD
c436
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
E4MB
c443
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
E41FE
c455
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
E4GC
c461
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
ESKA
c473
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
ESJB
c482
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
E6GB
c488
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
E7MA
c496
2019 Waterline Replacement
E7JA
c498
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
E9MA
c502
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
EBGA
c516
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
EBJA
c523
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
EBFC
c525
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
EOMA
c536
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
E7MA
c544
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
EOFA
c546
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
EOFB
c547
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
EOGA
c548
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
EOJA
c549
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
EOMA
c551
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
E20FC
c552
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
E21 FA
c556
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
E21JA
c558
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
E21 GA
c559
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
E21 FB
c560
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
E21JB
c561
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
E21 GB
c562
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
E21 FD
c563
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
E21 FE
c564
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
E22JA
c565
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
E22GA
c566
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
E22FA
c567
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
E6AB
i015
Funding
STM
STIR
STIR
STM
STM
FAC
STM
SWR
WTR
WTR
SWR
PRK
WTR
FAC
SWR
WTR
STM
PRK
PRK
STM
STM
SWR
WTR
PRK
STM
PRK
WTR
SWR
STM
WTR
SWR
STM
STM
WTR
SWR
STM
STIR
c
m
E
M
a
a�
3
c
M
U)
Y
V
a�
E
w
0
0
L
a
0.
P
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 170
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #)
8.5.c
Engineering
Project
Protect Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Number
Minor Sidewalk Program
E6DD
i017
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
E7DC
i026
220th Adaptive
EBAB
i028
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
EBCA
i029
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
EBCC
i031
ADA Curb Ramps
EBDB
i033
2019 Traffic Calming
E9AA
i038
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
E9DA
i040
2020 Overlay Program
EOCA
i042
2019 Waterline Overlay
E9CB
i043
2020 Guardrail Installations
EOAA
i046
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Calming
EOAC
i048
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
EODB
i049
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
EODC
i050
2021 Overlay Program
E21 CA
i051
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
E20CB
i052
2020 Waterline Overlay
EOCC
i053
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
E20CE
i055
2021 Traffic Calming
E21 AA
i056
2021 Guardrail Installations
E21AB
i057
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
E21 DA
i058
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
E21 CB
i059
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
E21 CC
i060
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
E21 CD
i061
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
E21 DB
i061
2022 Overlay Program
E22CA
i063
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
E22CB
i064
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
E22CC
i065
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
E22CD
i066
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th)
E22CE
i067
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
E22CF
i068
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
E22CG
i069
2022 Signal Upgrades
E22AA
i070
2022 Traffic Calming Program
E22AB
i071
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
E22DA
i072
2022 Guardrail Program
E22AC
i073
Funding
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
WTR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
WTR
SWR
STM
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
c
m
E
M
a
a�
3
c
M
U)
Y
V
a�
E
w
0
0
L
a
0M
P
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 171
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #)
8.5.c
Engineering
Project
Protect Title
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
2023 Overlay Program
E23CA
i074
STR
2023 Waterline Overlay Program
E23CB
i075
WTR
2023 Sewer Overlay Program
E23CC
i076
SW R
2023 Stormwater Overlay Program
E23CD
i077
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
E7FG
m013
STM
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
E7MA
m103
PRK
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
E7FA
m105
STM
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
E22JB
m160
WTR
Standard Details Updates
ESNA
solo
UTILITIES
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
ESGB
s0l l
SWR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
E6AA
s014
STR
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
E6FD
s017
STM
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
EBJB
s020
UTILITIES
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
E9FA
s022
STM
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
EODA
s024
STR
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
EONA
s025
GF
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
EOJB
s026
WTR
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
E21 FC
s028
STM
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
E22NA
s029
UTILITIES
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
E22NB
s030
UTILITIES
c
m
E
M
a
a�
3
c
M
U)
Y
V
a�
E
w
0
0
L
a
Q.
P
Revised 6/29/2022
Packet Pg. 172
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
8.5.c
Engineering
Project
Protect Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Number
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
E4MB
c443
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
E9MA
c502
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
EONA
s025
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
E7MA
c496
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
EOMA
c536
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
E7MA
c544
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
EOMA
c551
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
E21 FA
c556
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
E7MA
m103
Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration
E22FB
a157
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
E4FC
c435
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
E4FD
c436
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
E4FE
c455
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
EBFC
c525
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
EOFA
c546
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
EOFB
c547
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
E20FC
c552
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
E21 FB
c560
Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project
E21 FD
c563
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project
E21 FE
c564
Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project
E22FA
c567
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
E21 CD
i061
2023 Stormwater Overlay Program
E23CD
i077
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
E7FG
m013
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
E7FA
m105
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
E6FD
s017
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
E9FA
s022
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
E21 FC
s028
Sunset Walkway Improvements
E1 DA
c354
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
E1 CA
c368
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
E6AB
i015
Minor Sidewalk Program
E6DD
i017
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
E7DC
i026
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
EBCA
i029
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
EBCC
i031
ADA Curb Ramps
EBDB
i033
2019 Traffic Calming
E9AA
i038
Funding
FAC
FAC
GF
PRK
PRK
PRK
PRK
PRK
PRK
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STM
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
c
m
E
M
a
a�
3
c
M
U)
Y
V
a�
E
w
0
0
L
a
0M
P
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 173
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
8.5.c
Engineering
Project
Protect Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Number
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
E91DA
i040
2020 Overlay Program
EOCA
i042
2020 Guardrail Installations
EOAA
i046
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Calming
EOAC
i048
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
EODB
i049
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
EODC
i050
2021 Overlay Program
E21 CA
i051
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
E20CB
i052
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
E20CE
i055
2021 Traffic Calming
E21 AA
i056
2021 Guardrail Installations
E21AB
i057
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
E21 DA
i058
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
E21 DB
i061
2022 Overlay Program
E22CA
i063
2022 Waterline Overlay Program
E22CB
i064
2022 Sewerline Overlay Program
E22CC
i065
2022 Stormwater Overlay Program
E22CD
i066
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th)
E22CE
i067
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)
E22CF
i068
SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th)
E22CG
i069
2022 Signal Upgrades
E22AA
i070
2022 Traffic Calming Program
E22AB
i071
2022 Pedestrian Safety program
E22DA
i072
2022 Guardrail Program
E22AC
i073
2023 Overlay Program
E23CA
i074
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
E6AA
s014
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
EODA
s024
220th Adaptive
EBAB
i028
2020 Waterline Overlay
EOCC
i053
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
E4GC
c461
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III
E6GB
c488
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
EBGA
c516
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
EOGA
c548
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
E21 GA
c559
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
E21 GB
c562
Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project
E22GA
c566
Funding
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
STR
SWR
SWR
SWR
SWR
SWR
SWR
SWR
c
m
E
M
a
a�
3
c
M
U)
Y
V
a�
E
w
0
0
L
a
0M
P
Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 174
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
8.5.c
Engineering
Project
Protect Title
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
E21 CC
i060
SW R
2023 Sewer Overlay Program
E23CC
i076
SW R
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
ESGB
s011
SWR
Standard Details Updates
ESNA
s010
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
EBJB
s020
UTILITIES
Utility Funds reserve Policies Study
E22NA
s029
UTILITIES
2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study
E22NB
s030
UTILITIES
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
ESKA
c473
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
ESJB
c482
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
E7JA
c498
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
EBJA
c523
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
EOJA
c549
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
E21JA
c558
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
E21JB
c561
WTR
Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project
E22JA
c565
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
E9CB
i043
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
E21CB
i059
WTR
2023 Waterline Overlay Program
E23CB
i075
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
E22JB
m160
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
EOJB
s026
WTR
P
Revised 6/29/2022
Packet Pg. 175
8.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Claim for Damages from Robert Bretz & Christina Schrum
Staff Lead: NA
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Marissa Cain
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Robert Bretz & Christina Schrum
Narrative
Robert Bretz
16705 74th PI W
($600.00)
Christina Schrum
212th St & 72nd St
($500.00)
Attachments:
Schrum, Christina - Claim for Damages - for council
Bretz, Robert - Claim for Damages - for council
Packet Pg. 176
CITY OF EDMONDS
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM
Date Claim Form
Received by City
Please take note that Cl. ?\ I SI I N A L - S GIN R t1 M , who currently resides at _
mailing address _ S A M E AS F"boy E
home phone # N A work phone #� and who resided at SP+IY\f A S
R UU� at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is C3 S3 a . is claiming damages
against in the sum of $ 5W. 00 arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
DATE OF OCCURRENCE: JUL/ 15 _. _10 2.2- TIME: t Z - S 5 p IJ _
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 2I S i ` bi7W gFN - z-"D �'� qq 1
DESCRIPTION:
Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage.
+ �►A� �1!1v �II�C� �F1�� [fir; 212�t 63•cT43i�i=t� 1zN"��e_��_��-�ti �lq
S T RIEET RP7 t t,JG PVRFUR NAV=-b ie PAI MTl M()
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers.
1 Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
4- Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes k No
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: .
and the policy #:
" ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY "
E
U
Form Revised 05/06/14 Pagel of 2
Packet Pg. 177
'1 2n22
* * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
'
I, i~ M P( L. L° , being first duly swom, depose and y th I am t e la' an
for the above
described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe it jsa�i to t1true. i f rth acknowledgethat any
information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and ma b s ect rsclvs p apt to RCW 42.56.
Signature of Claimant(s)
O
State of Washington
Q
County of
L
O
1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said
E
person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and
W
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
U
Dated: J % L 19, 2027,
v
c
O
Signature
O
L
O
Title
My appointment expires:
rn
a)
Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 5t�' Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Form Revised 05/06/14
Page 2 of 2
Packet Pg. 178
8.6.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM
Date Claim Farm
Received by City
Please take note that �(7 2 who currently resides at
mailing address Shill L—
home phone # work phone #t and who resided at
at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is is claiming damages
against tw- in the sum of $ arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
DATE OF OCCURRENCE: ;'�� ZP 2� p _TIIME:
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: %k %!� S % ` r L G� ��yvt c 1C; fi tldfil-
DESCRIPTION:
Describe the conduct and c'rcumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage.
se-r At r17e-die d
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers.
Epf.Cif 0ILt T _
ey-' F7n(o �.Z
3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy #:
* * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * *
License Plate #
Type Auto:
(year) (make)
DRIVER:
Address:
Phone#:
Driver License #
(model)
_ OWNER:
Address:
Phone#:
Passengers:
Name: Name:
Address: Address:
Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2
N
a�
a�
cc
E
Jq
E
M
U
Packet Pg. 179
Ai.
This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the
attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a
court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.
- 3,2"�t 0
Signature of Claimant Dante and pl ce (residential address, city and county) '
Or
Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county)
Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable)
Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2
E
U
Packet Pg. 180
8.6.b
Flow Technologies used my driveway @ 16705 7411 PL W to turn around there three ton
sewer inspection/re pair vehicle. Flow Technologies was undercontractto the City of Edmonds
for sewer inspection/re pair to inspect the sewer lines in the vicinity of my address (16705 741h PL W).
Flow Technolgies employees used my driveway as a turnaround. They ran overthe east cornerof the
concrete driveway @ 16705 7411 PI W, which is a stamped/colored 1 % feet border. They did structural
damage to the concrete border. I believe thatthe Flow Technologies employees used my driveway
as a turnaround because the egress to the north/east is a private road. (Flow Technologies vehicle
a�
was parked on the private road while they were accessingthe sewer manhole on the northwest E
CU
corner of where the private road begins). o
E
U
Attached is the bid for concrete work and photos of before and after. I am claiming a $600 dollar loss
for the repair of the east border of my driveway.
Robert Bretz
16705 74th P L W
Edmonds, WA 98026
(425) 770-2846
Packet Pg. 181
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Process for Filling Council Vacancy - Position #1
Staff Lead: Council President Olson
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
The vacancy of Council Position #1 will be filled with an appointment. The appointment process
includes posting and publicizing an application, reviewing applications, conducting interviews of
qualified candidates, and then culminates in a nomination/voting process of Council to select the
appointee.
Staff Recommendation
Approve questions to be included on the 2022 Application for Council Vacancy - Position #1 and discuss
proposed timeline.
Narrative
The most recent Council Vacancy was 2019; the application that was approved by that Council is
attached (1).
Two additional questions to be considered to add to this application:
1. Tell us about your experience as an Edmonds resident.
2. How have you included others in important conversations from under -served or hard -to -reach
populations in the past?
The proposed timeline for the appointment process is as follows:
Date Application Posted: Friday, July 29
Date of Application Deadline: Friday, August 19
Date(s) of Interviews: Still to be determined, pending staff availability
Date of Nominations/Voting/Appointment: Set once interview dates are determined.
There are a number of items still to be determined in this process, including the selection/voting
process. Tonight's discussion will allow the application process to be initiated in a timely fashion.
Attachments:
City Council Position No 2 Application 2019
Packet Pg. 182
9.1.a
City of Edmonds
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY COUNCIL
POSITION NO. 2
Please complete entire form.
Eligibility Requirements:
1) You must be registered to vote within the City; and
2) Have been a resident in the City for one year immediately preceding the appointment.
Applications are due to the City Council Office by 4:30pm on Friday, December 30, 2019. Applicants
may attach a cover letter and/or resume in addition to the application form. Please email
application materials, to Maureen.iudge@edmondswa.gov. You may print completed form and drop
off your application materials at the 111 Floor Reception Desk at City Hall, 121 S"' Ave. N. Edmonds. If
you are mailing your application, it must reach us by 4:30pm on 12/30/19. Please mail to: Edmonds
City Council Office—121511 Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020.
Interviews are tentatively scheduled for the week of 1/13/20; the City Council will consider nominations
at the regular Council meeting on 1/21/20.
Date:
Name:
Registered voter: []Yes ❑ No
Available to attend evening meetings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Available to daytime meetings?❑Yes ❑No
Contact Phone:
Length of residency in Edmonds:
Email:
If selected, would you campaign for election to retain your seat?[] Yes ❑No
1. What is your volunteer experience?
Please see attached pages
Packet Pg. 183
9.1.a
L Abal i-s nur X4111C1I= 82 Qwi nce?
2. Have you previously served as an elected official or do you have any experience as an appointed
official including -public boards, commissions, committees, etc. in either Edmonds or elsewhere?
3. What are three of your greatest strengths and three of your greatest weaknesses?
c
0
0
c
0
0
U
ii
I.-
0
U)
W
ci
O
L
a
0
N
C
O
R
v
.Q
Q
Q
N
O
Z
C
0
N
O
a
c
O
U
U
c
O
E
t
v
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 184
9.1.a
I YYhatAQUId Im y== Sh= jaag rlm fQL=altY.?
`� Y1LhSt SiQ Y.Q.0 ,iQ.@ 3S Y.QldCS SOS1 � SiQldOS�l1'S IQIQ 10 ,Q1JL �QIIltIll1Q ib!?.
6. What do you believe to be the greatest challenge for our City Council?
Packet Pg. 185
9.1.a
L Bou add any. addWonal ru=p.=
Packet Pg. 186
9.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Report on Construction Bids for the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Project
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Emiko Rodarte
Background/History
On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was
forwarded to a future City Council meeting for possible approval.
Staff Recommendation
Reject construction bids.
Narrative
On June 28, 2022 the City received ten (10) bids for the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Project.
The bids ranged from a low of $355,647.89 by Northern Contractors LLC to a high of $643,017.18 by A-1
Landscaping and Construction, Inc. The engineer's estimate was $379,075.78.
This project will expand the capacity of an existing infiltration facility located at Seaview Park by adding
an additional row of underground injection wells beneath a stormwater dispersion chamber and
connecting it to the existing stormwater drainage system. Major project elements include excavation
and backfill for storm pipe, catch basins, a stormwater pre-treatment structure, HMA pavement
restoration, infiltration well construction, and connection to existing stormwater system.
Due to the complexities of the project, similar project experience requirements with an associated
section for them to fill in pertinent information, was introduced into the contract documents. This was
done to decrease the number of inexperienced contractors that would submit a bid for this work. Upon
evaluation of the requirements it was determined that:
Northern Contractor's bid was not responsive because they failed to demonstrate successful
past construction experience by submitting information on at least two projects that are similar
in size and scope to this project within the last three years.
The bid for New X Inc. was considered irregular and rejected because they submitted an
improperly executed proposal form, and failed to provide their Employment Security
Department number.
The contractors did not fill out correctly the information for staff to ascertain that they met the
similar project experience requirements.
Lastly, there was a quantity omission error in one of the project's bid items. This error was only
discovered after the bids were received, which meant that a clarifying addenda could not be issued to fix
the omission. This led to staff not being able to evaluate the costs for this bid item.
Packet Pg. 187
9.2
City staff recommends rejection of all bids. Revisions will be made to the project bid documents to more
explicitly describe what the contractor and subcontractors need to include in their similar project
experience submittal to document successful past construction experience of projects of similar size and
scope, fix the quantity omission and then re -advertise for bids at a later date.
Project costs are being funded by a Department of Ecology Stormwater Grant and the 422 Utility
Fund.
Attachments:
Attachment 1- Seaview Phase 2 Project Map
Packet Pg. 188
City of Edmonds
Maabook
9.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Award Construction Contract for the 76th Overlay Project
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Emiko Rodarte
Background/History
On May 10, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was
forwarded to a future consent agenda for possible approval.
Staff Recommendation
Award construction contract to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $1,981,243.20 and
authorize a management reserve of $198,130 for the 76th Ave Overlay Project.
Narrative
The project consists of a full -width grind and pavement overlay on 76th Ave. W from 196th St. SW/ SR-
524 to Olympic View Dr. This project also includes adding a northbound bike lane (196th St SW to 1,000
ft south of Olympic View Dr.), minor utility repairs and upgrading all noncompliant ADA curb ramps
within the project limits. The east side of the street is within City of Lynnwood and will be incorporated
into the project.
The 76t" Ave Overlay project advertised for bids on June 23rd and June 301". Two contractors
submitted bids that were opened on Thursday, July 14th. JB Asphalt submitted a bid of
$2,306,686.80 and Granite Construction Company (Granite) submitted the low bid of
$1,981,243.20. The low bid was approximately 26% higher than the Engineer's Estimate (June)
of $1,569,648. The City completed a review of Granite's record and contacted references which
were positive. A copy of the bid tabulation is attached.
City staff believe that a number of factors are contributing to the notable increase in cost:
Inflation - The inflation currently impacting global economies is felt even more acutely in
the construction industry where oil prices and labor costs constitute significant portions of
overall expenses.
Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) Goal - WSDOT assigned this project an unusually
high DBE goal of 23%. This is a very challenging goal to meet for an overlay project
especially when many DBE contractors are already busy for this year. This may have
resulted in fewer DBE subcontractors competing for the work and providing construction
bids for this project.
Packet Pg. 190
9.3
Bidding Season - The project advertisement was delayed due to lengthy review times by
WSDOT. City staff initially reached out to WSDOT in February to begin their review of City
bid documents and to receive permission to advertise the project. Ordinarily this would
provide enough review time to allow for the project to be advertised in early May, but a
prolonged review process pushed the advertisement of construction bids into late June.
2022 Spring Weather - The unseasonably cold and wet spring weather experienced this
year in Western Washington made it difficult for paving companies to work.
Consequently, all of the paving work in our region is occurring on a compressed timeline
since the paving window typically ends in October. This may be the reason only two bids
were received, since other paving companies may have been less likely to submit
construction bids with the reduced paving window.
The City was successful in securing a federal grant in 2018 to fund a portion of the Edmonds' share of
the project. The initial local match required for the grant was programmed from REET Funds (Fund 125).
The City is also in the process of securing an additional $170,100 in federal funds that will be used to
fund the project. The estimated shortfall (approximately $170,000) will be funded from the 2022
overlay program. Refer to the proposed budget in attachment 2.
Lynnwood will be paying for its side of the corridor with local funds. The Cities of Edmonds and
Lynnwood signed an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) on February 19t", 2021, establishing a cooperative
relationship to complete the work.
City staff has been coordinating with WSDOT and the City of Lynnwood. Both are expected to concur
with the award before Edmonds' City Council meets on Tuesday, July 26tn
Construction is expected to begin in late August or early September and should be complete by
November.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Area Map
Attachment 2 - Proposed Construction Budget
Packet Pg. 191
76TH AVE PAVE - AREA MAP
9.3.a
�._ :_�;�+ � - •ram' , � :� t: ,.. _ .,• , r• .-� ,� . � _
� .�"'�` .� _. �,�.� .`� _ ..',fir} � - r-� y * ` .•� � :'..y # �;yi �� •� r�ra.
AN_yr r
;.
�. v �+• _ -
• �� r % J r � rir'�. '�` :�� �, d' : 1 � fir:: � ^•� �� . '.i _ �: I�
1i i xr r : �r _ a. •.T III
Ar
r�-•�'- .-�� � �` . x�' � =fir I
5 E N D PAV E - O
VIEW DR 3.. 'r4 �r
, r�r
[+jam' i�•+ �r , �T PERRINVILLE �•- �j`,.
�'•ay r. Yam►► ti [� '• � .. r- � ='1".. .�a � ^ P:' . •�'
pf
0.7
• 4 �' ' . :�-.moo. +. �.. .: � -Y n , y t � -
�
4:
f=- IT r.
_ � � _ � � `ice• "�� �.� •�+�•��
JI
r+� '• � tr.i Y
2
BEGIN PAVE
? - s SR 524/196th St,SrT
Ls
rT
• - .r f _ R .-- -
rT n
- rr.� • t`
S
r
r
Packet Pg. 192
9.3.b
EXHIBIT 2
76th Ave Overlay
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION BUDGET
BUDGET
Edmonds
Lynnwood
Total
Contract Award
$
1,032,988
$
948,255
$
1,981,243
Construction Management,
Inspection, & Testing (14%)
$
144,620
$
132,760
$
277,380
Management Reserve (10%)
$
103,300
$
94,830
$
198,130
TOTALS
$
1,280,908
$
1,175,845
$
2,456,753
CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
FUNDING
Edmonds
Lynnwood
REET (Fund 125)
$ 360,000
Federal Grant
$ 750,000
Street Construction (Fund 112 - Overlay Program)
$ 52,140
REET (Fund 125 - Overlay Program)
$ 60,480
REET (Fund 126 - Overlay Program)
$ 58,288
City of Lynnwood
$ 1,175,845
TOTALS
$ 1,280,908
$ 1,175,845
r
Q
Packet Pg. 193
9.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Position Conversion to 1.0 FTE for DV Coordinator Position
Staff Lead: Chief Michelle Bennett
Department: Police Services
Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert
Background/History
The D.V. Coordinator position has previously been a .5 FTE. I am asking for it to be converted to a 1.0
FTE due to work load management. This went through the Finance Committee on July 12.
Staff Recommendation
We would like approval of 1.0 FTE for the DV position so we can post and hire for this job.
Narrative
For many years the city has run with a .5 DV (Domestic Violence) Advocate position. With DV calls
running on average at approximately 400 calls per year, there is more than enough workload for our DV
advocate to work full time. If the DV advocate worked 365 days a year, he or she still would not have
time to manage, on average, one case a day. As population and officer numbers increase, this need of
victim advocacy will be ever more prevalent. In previous years, our part time DV advocate expressed
frustration at the lack of dedication and resources toward DV and victim advocacy.
The DV Advocate position requires a different skill set working with other experts in victim advocacy and
with police and prosecutors as opposed to the human who most often finds resources for the mentally
ill, homeless, or chronically addicted. The DV victim often suffers in the cycle of violence with mental,
physical, emotional and/or financial domination or cruelty. These elements require specialized services
of a trained victim advocacy professional. Such a skill set requires that the DV Advocate possess
kindness, support, and connection to the right people. Contracting these services out might not give our
community members the dedicated services that they need. Additionally, the person might not be able
to access some of our systems due to CAS and other background issues. For these and other reasons,
not the least of which is the difficulty in hiring a part-time person, and the general lack of police
resources, it is the recommendation of my department that this position be made a full-time FTE.
The DV Coordinator is in the budget at a 0.5 FTE, the budget amount is about $55,000 per year. Moving
to a 1.0 FTE would bring that amount up to around $105,000, roughly.
Attachments:
FW_ parking and DV positions
Parking and DV Question
Effect of Increased Positions
Packet Pg. 194
9.4.a
From: Bennett, Michelle
To: Ehlert, Alexandra
Subject: FW: parking and DV positions
Date: Thursday, July 7, 2022 16:38:50
Attachments: innaae001.ona
Parking and DV Ouestion.pdf
Michelle D. Bennett
Chief of Police
Edmonds Police Department
michelle.bennett@edmondswa.gov
Office: 425-771-0200
Cell: 425-478-7207
Fax: 425-771-0208
10
250 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Main Line: (425) 771-0200
Service - Integrity - Respect - Stewardship
From: Sharp, Debra <Debra.Sharp@edmondswa.gov>
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 16:12
To: Bennett, Michelle <michelle. ben nett@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Turley, Dave <Dave.Turley@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: FW: parking and DV positions
Hi Chief Bennett,
Dave asked me to reply to your question. Attached is the parking revenue for 2021 and 2022. I've
included the pay range for the two full-time positions in question. The DV coordinator is at .5 and
the parking enforcement officer is .75. The last page of the attached document includes the current
budgeted positions. You will notice the DV coordinator position is budgeted with all the benefits.
The ones based on a percentage of salary will change slightly but not much. The part-time parking
enforcement officer does not include benefits. Lori from payroll said for medical to add about 40%
of annual gross. I think the DV coordinator would give you a good start also.
I hope this helps. Sorry it took a bit longer than you requested. I am at my desk if you have any
questions —1368.
Debra Sharp (she/her), CPA
Accountant
Packet Pg. 195
9.4.a
City of Edmonds
Ofc: (425)275-4510
From: Turley, Dave <Dave.TurleyPedmondswa.gov>
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:49 PM
To: Sharp, Debra <Debra.SharpPedmondswa.gov>
Subject: FW: parking and DV positions
Deb — can you get this info? I tried looking in the Budget folder but I'm having computer issues and
can't view PDF files right now (!)
From: Bennett, Michelle<michelle. ben nettPedmondswa.gov>
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:35 PM
To: Turley, Dave <Dave.TurleyPedmondswa.gov>
Subject: parking and DV positions
Hi Dave -
I was hoping that you could give me the total costs of a couple of things:
What is the dollar cost of moving the parking enforcement position from .5 to a 1.0 FTE?
What is the dollar cost of moving the parking enforcement position from .5 to a 1.0 FTE?
Ion 2020, what was the revenue for our parking enforcement officer.
Sorry for the short notice, but trying to get this information prior to the 1630 deadline for the
personnel committee.
Michelle O
Michelle D. Bennett
Chief of Police
Edmonds Police Department
michelle.bennett@edmondswa.gov
Office: 425-771-0200
Cell: 425-478-7207
Fax: 425-771-0208
r �
u
Packet Pg. 196
9.4.a
250 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Main Line: (425) 771-0200
Service - Integrity - Respect - Stewardship
Packet Pg. 197
revstat.rpt
07/07/2022 2:52PM
Periods: 0 through 13
001 GENERAL FUND
Revenue Status Report
City of Edmonds
1/1/2021 through 12/31/2021
Adjusted
Year-to-date
Account Number
Estimate
Revenues
Revenues
001.000.354.00.000.00 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES
100,000.00
44,811.98
44,811.98
001.000.354.00.070.00 PARK / INDDISZONE
2,000.00
475.03
475.03
Total GENERAL FUND
102,000.00
45,287.01
45,287.01
Grand Total
102,000.00
45,287.01 45,287.01
9.4.b
Page: 1
W
H
u_
Prct o
Balance
Rcvc
O
55,188.02
44.81 0
O
1,524.97
23.7E
56,712.99
44.4( C
O
U
c
O
N
56,712.99
44.4( d
C
O
r
N
d
7
C�
C
al
C
Y
L
E
L
c.i
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 198
revstat.rpt
07/07/2022 2:52PM
Periods: 0 through 13
001 GENERAL FUND
Revenue Status Report
City of Edmonds
1/1/2022 through 12/31/2022
Adjusted
Year-to-date
Account Number
Estimate
Revenues
Revenues
001.000.354.00.000.00 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES
100,000.00
6,269.59
6,269.59
001.000.354.00.070.00 PARK / INDDISZONE
2,000.00
113.89
113.89
Total GENERAL FUND
102,000.00
6,383.48
6,383.48
Grand Total
102,000.00
6,383.48
6,383.48
9.4.b
Page: 1
W
H
u_
Prct o
Balance
Rcvc
O
93,730.41
6.2-1 0
O
1,886.11
5.6f
95,616.52
6.2E C
O
U
c
O
95,616.52
6.2E d
C
O
r
N
d
7
C�
C
al
C
Y
L
E
L
c.i
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 199
9.4.b
Police Non -Commissioned 12022 Rates)
Grade
Minimum
Maximum
Animal Control / Ordinance Enforcement Officer
NE-10
62,220
79,404
Community Engagement/Crime Prevention Coordinator
NE-11
65,328
83,376
Domestic Violence Coordinator
NE-10
62,220
79,404
Pa rt Ti me Ad m i n istrative Ass ista nt
NE-6
51,180
65,3M
Pa rt Ti me Pa rki ng Enforcement Off icer
NE-6
51,180
65,3M
Police Services Assistant
NE-7
53,748
68,592
Property Off icer/Eviden ce Tec h n ic ia n
NE-9
59,256
75,612
Sen ior An i ma I Control Off icer
NE-11
65,328
83,376
Senior Rol ice Services Assistant
NE-8
56,424
72,024
yes
1
1 unfilled yes
yes
1
yes
yes
0.50
yes
yes
0.50
yes
yes
0.75
.75 unfilled yes
yes
3
yes
yes
1
yes
yes
1
yes
yes
3
1 unfilled yes
a
Packet Pg. 200
9.4.b
pyBudDet
7/7/2022 3:30:04PM
Position Budget Detail Report
City of Edmonds
Model: 2022 Date Range: 01/01/2022 thru fiscal 2022
Page: 1
Thru End 2022
Fund : 001
Program : 000
Department : 41
0809/001 DV COORDINATOR .50 Position
H
2890 JILL A SCHICK
LL
o
Wages
39,696.00
T-
Premiums: acc
408.00
0
.r
Premiums: Ig1
792.00
N
Benefit: da -- LEOFF/POLICE SUPPORT (E)
349.68
Benefit: 10 -- Cigna Group Insurance
26.64
L
Benefit: lb -- Cigna Group Insurance
194.64
m
Benefit: ma -- LEOFF/POL SUPPORT (E)
4,962.36
G
Benefit: mebt -- MEBT
2,340.96
()
Benefit: medcr -- MEDICARE
593.04
>_
Benefit: pens -- PENSION
5,259.12
0_
Benefit: pfml -- PAID FAMILY & MEDICAL LEAVE
81.84
N
O
Benefit: va -- LEOFF/POL SUPPORT (E)
57.36
d
Total for 0809/001 DV COORDINATOR :
54,761.64
c
0814/001 PART TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT .75 Position
O
r
Unoccupied Position
ayi
Wages
39,348.00
CY
Benefit: fica -- Social Security
2,439.60
Benefit: medcr -- MEDICARE
570.60
Total for 0814/001
PART TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT:
42,358.20
C
O
Total for 001.000.41 :
97,119.84
C
Total for 001.000 :
97,119.84
Y
Total for 001 :
97,119.84
R
d
Grand Totals:
97,119.84
N
E
t
cC
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 201
9.4.c
This schedule is to show the effects of increasing the DV Coordinator position from 0.5 FTE to a 1.0 FTE, the Parking Enforcement
Officer from 0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE, both in the Police Department, and approving a new 1.0 FTE position for a Public Records Assistant
in the Administrative Services Department. Also to show the effect of adding another 1.0 FTE for a Public Records Specialist
in the Police Department.
Current Annual
Proposed Annual
Effect on 2022
Budget for
Budget
Actual - Assume
Salaries &
(Approximate) at
4 Months of
Department
Job Description
Current Status
Benefits
1.0 FTE
Employment
Police Dept.
DV Coordinator
Budgeted at 0.5 at Step 7
$ 54,762
$ 107,179
$ 35,726
Police Dept.
Parking Enforc. Officer
Budgeted at 0.75 at Step 1
42,358
70,826
23,609
Subtotal, Police Dept.
97,120
178,006
59,335
Admin. Srvcs.
Public Records Assist.
New position, not in budget, assume Step 1
-
73,807
24,602
Total Combined
$ 97,120
$ 251,813
$ 83,938
Effect on 2022
1.0 FTE
Cost of
Actual - Assume
(Currently
Additional 1.0
4 Months of
Approved)
FTE
Employment
1 FTE is approved in the budget, PD
Police Dept.
Public Records Spec.
is asking for a second position, assume Step 3
$ 92,599
$ 92,599
$ 30,866
Packet Pg. 202
9.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Public Disclosure Specialist Position Request
Staff Lead: Chief Michelle Bennett
Department: Police Services
Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert
Background/History
The budget for 1.0 FTE position has already been approved. We are now asking for approval for the job
description.
We are also requesting budget for a second position due to work load. Both of these items where
reviewed in committee on July 12.
Staff Recommendation
I am recommending the job description be approved and budget is granted for an additional FTE.
Narrative
Public Disclosure Requests (PDR) have become more frequent, in part, due to our current societal
norms. The Edmonds Police Department (also in compliance with new legislative initiatives) has been in
ongoing conversations to outfit Edmonds PD law enforcement officers with body cameras. In November
of 2021, the pilot project for body cameras started with 10 officers wearing them. The feedback for
these body cameras was very positive. Originally, the police department asked for (in the 2022 budget) a
commissioned officer and a PDR specialist to redact and process body cam PDRs. During the budget
process, the commissioned officer position was removed. Therefore, the budget currently allows for one
full-time PDR position to be hired (ordinance attached). HR has reviewed and approved our PDR job
description, and conversations related to collective bargaining have also occurred. We are requesting
from full council that the PDR job description be accepted and that a second position is approved.
Though the process of the pilot project, the police department realized that for every hour of body cam
footage, it took almost six hours of redaction. Per a conversation with my training corporal today, that
number is now about two and a half to five hours per hour of body cam video (some reduction as our
training corporal got used to the system). When one considers that up to 55 officers could wear body
cameras, the amount of PDR requests and the time to process those requests will most likely become
restrictive for all involved. Most traffic stops last 15-30 minutes (depending on the nature of the stop)
and calls and arrests can last for several hours. Multiple officers might wear a camera for one incident,
and each camera's footage for that one PDR, must be processed and redacted.
Two PDR persons might not be enough for our police department, but it is a good place to start. It would
make sense to post for both positions at the same time. The PDR job description was approved at the
personnel committee meeting held on July 121h. It is important that the police department and the city
be timely with PDRs. Daily fines occur for failing to comply with PDR timelines. For this and other
aforementioned reasons, it is important that the police department receive two PDR positions.
Packet Pg. 203
9.5
Attachments:
Position Description
2022-07-14 Salary Schedule amendment Ord
Effect of Increased Positions
Packet Pg. 204
9.5.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
Police Public Disclosure Specialist
Department:
Police
Pay Grade:
NE-10
Bargaining Unit:
EPOA - Law Support
FLSA Status:
Non -Exempt
Revised Date:
February 2022
Reports To:
Sergeant
POSITION PURPOSE:
Under general supervision of a Sergeant, receives, analyzes, researches, processes and responds to police public
records requests in compliance with State laws, regulations and department policy; collaborates with Departments
and staff to coordinate a timely and appropriate City-wide response; works with the City Attorney to evaluate
exemptions, makes appropriate redactions and maintains exemption logs and statistics to substantiate
compliance; contributes to the development and implementation of records related policies and best practices.
ESSENTIAL FUNTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees
in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may
not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties.
• Processes police public disclosure requests in compliance with the WA State Public Records Act, the
Model Rules adopted by the WA Attorney General's office, and internal City and Department policies.
• Utilizes provided public disclosure software/programs to maintain tracking, documentation and statistics
to substantiate compliance with legal requirements and policies.
• Communicates with public records requestors to obtain clarification when necessary, prioritize elements
of the request, determine reasonable timeframes for response or installments, and keeps the requestor
informed on the progress of the request; memorializing the communications in writing.
• Provides third -party notification to affected parties as required or appropriate to maintain the balance
between meeting public disclosure obligations and safeguarding privacy and confidential information.
• Researches, queries and collects all potential responsive records whether active or inactive and
regardless of format such as physical or digital to include but not limited to reports, videos, photos and
audio.
• Collaborates with department members and other City departments on the production of records in
response to public records requests; establishes timeframes for responses and coordinates the assembly
of requested records.
• Reviews collected records to ensure they are responsive, complete and in accordance with the public
records request submitted to the Department. Records may contain graphic, violent, and/or disturbing
content.
• Determines if collected records are exempt from production following established laws and directives;
seek legal review and guidance from City Attorney as necessary.
• Redacts exempt information from responsive records, physical or digital, using department provided
software before releasing records; prepares exemption/redaction logs to accompany the release.
• Provides conclusive written communication to requestors upon closure of public records requests; logs
and tracks overall timeline metrics.
• Maintains applicable logs to support potential collection of fees from as allowed by law and policy.
Police Public Disclosure Specialist
Packet Pg. 205
9.5.a
2 of 3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Police Public Disclosure Specialist
• Provides guidance to department employees on compliance and the requirements of the Public Records
Act and City practices when maintaining and releasing records.
• Develops and maintains a variety of performance measures documenting volumes and complexity of
requests and work effort required to comply with State law, policies and procedures.
• Reports on public disclosure operations and documentation during State audits.
• Assists the City Attorney in establishing and maintaining legal holds and collects records in response to
litigation and discovery requests.
• Maintains and updates the department master exemption log and coordinates with supervisor and the
City Attorney for review and concurrence for publishing to the public.
• Oversees on -site viewing of records or provides copies of requested records to fulfill requests; maintains
records of all public records requests and responses to such requests.
• Maintains, archives and purges records according to City retention policies and Washington State law.
• Responds to general inquiries from the public; provides information, instructions, and assistance to assist
customers having business with the City.
• Supports the relationship between the City of Edmonds and the constituent population by demonstrating
courteous and cooperative behavior when interacting with clients, visitors, and City staff; promotes City
goals and priorities in compliance with all policies and procedures.
• Perform other duties as assigned.
Required Knowledge of:
• The Public Records Act (RCW 42.56)
• State records management statutes and guidance.
• Police Department policies, procedures and general orders.
• Modern office practices and processing tools for applicable programs and media.
• Customer service principles
• English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Skill and Ability to:
• Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing, with tact and courtesy.
• Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with public officials, City staff, and
the general public.
• Work independently as well as collectively.
• Interpret and apply new information.
• Conduct thorough file and document searches in electronic and paper document filing systems.
• Analyze large volumes of complex information while consistently applying laws/standards.
• Work under pressure and maintain deadlines
• Organize and manage workload; make decision necessary to respond to information requests in an
expeditious manner.
• Work effectively with individuals and agencies with a variety of backgrounds and purposes.
• Read reports, view and listen to audio records, photographs and videos that may contain disturbing
information involving sex crimes, serious assaults, homicide and fatality collisions.
• Maintain strict confidentiality and exercise discretion when handling sensitive information.
• Encourage a work environment free of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation.
• Support diversity and multicultural understanding in the workplace.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Police Public Disclosure Specialist
Packet Pg. 206
9.5.a
3 of 3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Police Public Disclosure Specialist
Education and Experience:
Associates Degree in Records/Information Management, Library Science, Business Administration, or related field
AND two (2) years of general office, communications, or customer support experience that includes records
management. Experience dealing with confidential information and records in a law enforcement, judicial office or
similar environment is preferred; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience which allows
the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions of the position.
Licensing and Certifications:
• Valid WA State Driver's License and a driving record acceptable to the City's insurance requirements.
• Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check.
• Obtain Washington State ACCESS System Certification (Level II) and CJIS Certification upon hire.
• Obtain Public Records Officer certification within three (3) years of hire date.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office environment.
• Constant interruptions.
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Reading and understanding a variety of materials.
• Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise
positioning oneself to accomplish tasks.
• Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs.
Hazards:
• Contact with dissatisfied and/or abusive customers.
Incumbent Signature:
Department Head:
Date:
Date:
Police Public Disclosure Specialist
Packet Pg. 207
9.5.b
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE BUDGETED FULL TIME
EQUIVALENT POSITIONS AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED THROUGH
THE 2022 BUDGET BY ADDING CERTAIN NEW POSITIONS WITH
CORRESPONDING SALARY RANGES.
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.33.050 requires the salary or salary range for each office, position
or job classification to be set forth separately together with the title or position designation thereof
in the city's budget; and
WHEREAS, the 2022 adopted budget (page 17) included various full time equivalent
positions by department to authorize hiring and maintenance of staff at certain levels; and
WHEREAS, the 2022 adopted budget (pages 177 through 180) includes the approved
salary ranges for each position; and
WHEREAS, the mayor has determined that the city should create certain new positions
during this budget cycle; and
WHEREAS, no additional appropriation for 2022 would be required to create these
positions because there is more than adequate salary savings in the general fund due to various
vacancies in other positions; and
WHEREAS, even though adequate funds exist in the general fund, it is still necessary for
the city council to approve these new positions and their salaries before hiring can occur;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The city council hereby approves the addition of the full time equivalent
positions and their corresponding salary ranges as shown on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Packet Pg. 208
9.5.b
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
PASSED by the City Council this day of July 2022.
APPROVED
MAYOR, MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
2
Packet Pg. 209
9.5.b
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
By:
CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE:
ORDINANCE NO:
Packet Pg. 210
9.5.b
Q
Packet Pg. 211
9.5.b
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On July _, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, adopted
Ordinance No. the main point of which may be summarized by its title as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE BUDGETED FULL TIME
EQUIVALENT POSITIONS AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED THROUGH
THE 2022 BUDGET BY ADDING CERTAIN NEW POSITIONS WITH
CORRESPONDING SALARY RANGES.
The full text of this ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of July, 2022.
SCOTT PASSEY, CITY CLERK
5
Packet Pg. 212
9.5.c
This schedule is to show the effects of increasing the DV Coordinator position from 0.5 FTE to a 1.0 FTE, the Parking Enforcement
Officer from 0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE, both in the Police Department, and approving a new 1.0 FTE position for a Public Records Assistant
in the Administrative Services Department. Also to show the effect of adding another 1.0 FTE for a Public Records Specialist
in the Police Department.
Current Annual
Proposed Annual
Effect on 2022
Budget for
Budget
Actual - Assume
Salaries &
(Approximate) at
4 Months of
Department
Job Description
Current Status
Benefits
1.0 FTE
Employment
Police Dept.
DV Coordinator
Budgeted at 0.5 at Step 7
$ 54,762
$ 107,179
$ 35,726
Police Dept.
Parking Enforc. Officer
Budgeted at 0.75 at Step 1
42,358
70,826
23,609
Subtotal, Police Dept.
97,120
178,006
59,335
Admin. Srvcs.
Public Records Assist.
New position, not in budget, assume Step 1
-
73,807
24,602
Total Combined
$ 97,120
$ 251,813
$ 83,938
Effect on 2022
1.0 FTE
Cost of
Actual - Assume
(Currently
Additional 1.0
4 Months of
Approved)
FTE
Employment
1 FTE is approved in the budget, PD
Police Dept.
Public Records Spec.
is asking for a second position, assume Step 3
$ 92,599
$ 92,599
$ 30,866
Packet Pg. 213
9.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
New Public Records Associate Position
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Nicholas Falk
Background/History
The Administrative Services Department currently has one Public Records Officer who responds to
Public Records Requests for the City, other than requests that go to the Police Department. The demand
placed on the City's Public Records Responders has grown dramatically over the last few years, to a pace
that we can no longer keep up with. We are submitting this proposal at the same time that the Police
Department is submitting similar proposals, so that Council can see them and discuss them at the same
time. (This is a separate agenda item mostly because it comes from a different department.) The
currently posted salary for an NE-9 is from $4,909 to $6,088 monthly. See attachment for additional
information.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is asking for 1) a new Job Description to be approved for a Public Records Assistant and 2) a new
position to be approved, so that we can fill the position.
Attachments:
Public Records info
Public Records Associate JD FOR COUNCIL
Effect of Increased Positions
Packet Pg. 214
9.6.a
Additional background related to the request for a new Public Records Assistant position
We have 24 Public Records Requests open as of July 1, which is the most we have had at once
time for a long time. Public Records Requests that we have received and are currently open will
take an estimated 10 years to fully process and close, at our current rate.
We had 285 Public Records Requests opened between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2021.
We have had 178 Public Records Requests opened between 1/1/2022 and 7/1/2022.
We have successfully closed 462 Public Records Requests between 1/1/2021 and 7/1/2022. This
includes requests that were opened prior to 2021 but were closed within that date range.
These numbers are simply the total requests made, and do not reflect the time spent searching
a�
for, reviewing, redacting records; emails, texts, reaching out to Staff and working with the
U
0
Attorneys. Nor does it reflect in-house records requests such as the Attorneys asking for
Q
records for investigations, etc. or working on lawsuit discovery projects.
We only have one person in Administrative Services to manage this workload. This workload
0
U
W
leaves no time to draft policies, make process improvements, do public records training for
.2
staff, or take time off. a
This proposal would place the new Public Records Assistant job at an NE-9 pay range, which is
the same as the other Administrative Assistant positions in the Department and two pay ranges
lower than the Public Records Officer position. This would allow for the opportunity for growth
in the position over time.
Packet Pg. 215
9.6.b
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
Public Records Associate
Department: Administrative Services Pay Grade: NE-9
Bargaining Unit: AFSCME FLSA Status: Non -Exempt
Revised Date: 7/15/2022 Reports To: Deputy Administrative Services
Director
POSITION PURPOSE: Under administrative direction, analyzes, processes and responds to public
records requests; receives and reviews requests, communicates with requestors for clarification when
needed, and collaborates with Departments to coordinate a timely and appropriate City-wide response;
works with the Public Records Officer and/or City Attorney to evaluate exemptions, make appropriate
redactions and to maintain exemption logs and statistics to substantiate compliance with the Public
Records Act requirements, the Model Rules, and City policy; Serves as the Public Records Officer
backup.
ESSENTIAL FUNTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all
employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities.
Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional,
position -specific duties.
• Coordinates timely and appropriate responses to public disclosure requests.
• Updates tracking log, documentation, and statistics to substantiate compliance with Public
Records Act requirements, the Model Rules, and internal City policy.
• Administers the public disclosure software used for on-line requests and tracking.
• Communicates with requestors to ensure timely and full assistance on public disclosure requests.
Clarifies and prioritizes elements of the request, estimates reasonable timeframes for response,
and memorializes these communications in writing.
• Provides preliminary research on the location of responsive records and collaborates with
departments on production of records responsive to requests. Establishes timeframes for
responses. Coordinates assembly of multi -departmental responses.
• Reviews collected records to ensure they are responsive, complete and in accordance with the
request submitted to the City.
• Conducts research and analysis to determine if collected records are exempt from production and
coordinates with the City Attorney for review of records determined to be exempt. Redacts exempt
information before releasing records.
• Assists the Public Records Officer and/or City Attorney in establishing and maintaining legal holds
and collects records in response to litigation and discovery requests.
• Provides routine updates on the status of requests and performance measures.
• Reports on public disclosure operations and documentation as needed.
• Oversees on -site viewing of records or provides copies of requested records to fulfill
requests; maintains records of all public records requests and responses to such requests.
Public Records Associate Last Reviewed: 07/19/2022
Last Revised: 07/
Packet Pg. 216
9.6.b
2of3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Public Records Associate
• Serves as Public Records Officer backup.
• May perform other duties as assigned that are within the classification's scope of work.
Required Knowledge of:
• Knowledge of records management and public disclosure laws, regulations, and policies.
• Skill in gathering records, organizing the information and providing timely responses.
• Skills in effectively communicating both orally and in writing.
• Ability to work in a complex records and information environment involving application and
interpretation of rules, regulations and policies.
• Ability to analyze large volumes of complex information under strict legal deadlines.
• Ability to maintain strict confidentiality and exercise discretion and sound decision making when
handling sensitive documents.
• Ability to communicate with customers and to form relationships.
• Ability to document information regarding research, practices and resources.
• Ability to handle multiple and competing deadlines and priorities, organize and manage workload,
and make decision necessary to respond to information requests in an expeditious manner.
• Ability to work cooperatively and respectfully with the public and staff.
• Ability to safely work in office or from home as -needed and remain flexible to working in office or
home due to public health -related situations.
Required Skill in:
• Conducting document and file searches in electronic and paper document filing systems.
• Working with technical staff to access records in electronic files formats from various storage
systems.
• Analyzing, recommending, and implementing improvements to records management systems
including managing record series, indexes and inventory control to enable efficient access.
• Preparing records for release using document imaging, photocopying and/or electronic file copies.
• Working effectively with a variety of individuals from diverse backgrounds.
• Preparing and maintaining a variety of records and files related to assigned activities.
• Meeting schedules and legal timelines.
• Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work
and in compiling and preparing spreadsheets.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with others.
• Maintaining confidentiality and communicating with tact and diplomacy.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing, including public relations.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience
Associates degree or equivalent in Records/Information Management, Library Science, Business, or
related field AND one (1) year of clerical experience that includes records management. Experience
dealing with confidential information and records in a municipal or similar environment is preferred.
a�
U
0
Q
L
0
U
a�
a
Public Records Associate Last Reviewed: 07/19/2022
Last Revised: 07/
Packet Pg. 217
9.6.b
3of3
JOB DESCRIPTION
Public Records Associate
An equivalent combination of education, training and experience which allows the incumbent to
successfully perform the essential functions of the position may also be considered.
Licensing and Certifications:
• Public Records Officer Certification or the ability to obtain within three (3) years.
• Valid WA State Driver's License and a driving record acceptable to the City's insurance
requirements.
• A criminal background check is required following a verbal offer.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office environment
• Constant interruptions
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Reading and understanding a variety of materials.
• Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or
otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks.
• Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs.
Hazards:
• Contact with angry and/or dissatisfied customers.
Incumbent Signature:
Department Head:
Date:
Date:
Public Records Associate
Last Reviewed: 07/19/2022
Last Revised: 07/
Packet Pg. 218
9.6.c
This schedule is to show the effects of increasing the DV Coordinator position from 0.5 FTE to a 1.0 FTE, the Parking Enforcement
Officer from 0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE, both in the Police Department, and approving a new 1.0 FTE position for a Public Records Assistant
in the Administrative Services Department. Also to show the effect of adding another 1.0 FTE for a Public Records Specialist
in the Police Department.
Current Annual
Proposed Annual
Effect on 2022
Budget for
Budget
Actual - Assume
Salaries &
(Approximate) at
4 Months of
Department
Job Description
Current Status
Benefits
1.0 FTE
Employment
Police Dept.
DV Coordinator
Budgeted at 0.5 at Step 7
$ 54,762
$ 107,179
$ 35,726
Police Dept.
Parking Enforc. Officer
Budgeted at 0.75 at Step 1
42,358
70,826
23,609
Subtotal, Police Dept.
97,120
178,006
59,335
Admin. Srvcs.
Public Records Assist.
New position, not in budget, assume Step 1
-
73,807
24,602
Total Combined
$ 97,120
$ 251,813
$ 83,938
Effect on 2022
1.0 FTE
Cost of
Actual - Assume
(Currently
Additional 1.0
4 Months of
Approved)
FTE
Employment
1 FTE is approved in the budget, PD
Police Dept.
Public Records Spec.
is asking for a second position, assume Step 3
$ 92,599
$ 92,599
$ 30,866
Packet Pg. 219
9.7
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) Training (Part 2)
Staff Lead: Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Nicholas Falk
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The city attorney will continue with the OPMA training. The first part of this training took place on
February 25, 2022, during the city council retreat. There was not time during the retreat to complete the
training. Also, the legislature amended the OPMA after February 25, 2022. So, the training will cover the
2022 amendments.
Attachments:
2022-07-26 OPMA training - part 2
Packet Pg. 220
Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA)
Training
February 25, 2022 (part 1 - ends with discussion of Proclamation)
July 26, 2022 (part 2 - starts with Miscellaneous (slide 66))
Lighthouse
LyawPacket Pg. 221
Outline
The Basics
Committees
Serial Meetings
Conditions on Attendance
Governor's Proclamation
Miscellaneous
Executive Sessions
Violations
Lighthouse
LyawPacket Pg. 222
The Basics
0 LighthL yawou�
Why do we have the OPMA?
"All political power is inherent in the
people, and governments derive
their just powers from the consent of
the governed."
Const. art. I I § 1.
Lighthouse
LyawPacket Pg. 224
Why do we have the OPMA?
The legislature ... declares that all
... councils, ... exist to aid in the
conduct of the people's business.
0 0 0
RCW 42-30 - 010
Lighthou
LyawPacket Pg
Why do we have the OPMA?
... It is the intent of this chapter that
their actions be taken openly and
that their deliberations be
conducted openly.
RCW 42-30 - 010
Lighthouse
LyawPacket Pg. 226
The basic OPMA requirement
All meetings of the governini � body
of a public agency shall be open
and public ..., except as otherwise
provided in this chapter.
RCW 42-30-030
Lighthouse
LyawPacket "P�g.2271
What's a meeting?
(4) "Meeting" means meetings at
which action is taken.
RCW 42-30.020
0 � Lighthouse
LyawPacket Pg. 228
What is "action"?
(3) "Action" means the transaction of
the official business of a public agency
by a governing body including but not
limited to receipt of public testimony,
deliberations, discussions,
considerations, reviews, evaluations,
and final actions.
RCW 42-30.020
' Lighthouse
L Law29
Transitive Property of the OPMA
Meeting
= Action
Action = Discussion of official
business
Meeting = Discussion of official
business
0 Lighthouse
LLawPacket Pg. 230
Who is subject to OPMA?
(1)"Public age. , " means:
(a) Any state board, commission, committee,
department, educational institution, or other
state agency which is created by or pursuant
to statute, other than courts and the
legislature;
RCW 42-30.020
Lighthouse
am �Law
Who is subject to OPMA?
(1)"Public age., " means:
(b) Any county, city, school district, special
purpose district, or other municipal
corporation or political subdivision of the
state of Washington;
RCW 42.30.020
' Lighthouse
haw
Who is subject to OPMA?
(1)"Public age. , " means:
(c) Any subagency of a public agency which
is created bv or qursuant to statute.
ordinance, or other legislative act, including
but not limited to planning commissions,
library or park boards, commissions, and
agencies;
RCW 42-30.020
' Lighthouse
Law - •
Who is subject to OPMA?
(1)"Public agency" means:
(d) Any policy group whose membership
includes representatives of publicly owned
utilities formed by or pursuant to the laws of
this state when meeting together as or on
behalf of participants who have contracted
for the output of generating plants being
planned or built by an operating agency.
RCW 42.30.020
' Lighthouse
haw
Does the OPMA address quorum?
All meetings of the governini • body
of a public agency shall be open
and public ..., except as otherwise
provided in this chapter.
RCW 42-30-030
RV 0 Lighthouse
s L LawPacket Pg. 235
Can OPMA apply to < quorum?
(2) "Governing body" means the
multimember board, commission,
committee, council, or other policy or rule -
making body of a public agency, or any
committee thereof when the committee acts
on behalf of the governing body, conducts
hearings, or takes testimony or public
comment.
RCW 42-30.020
' L ighthouse
Law
Committees
0 Lighthou
LyawPacket Pg. 237
Can OPMA apply to < quorum?
... any committee thereof when the
committee
1. acts on behalf of the governing body,
2. conducts hearings, or
I takes testimony or public comment.
RCW 42.30.020
Lighthouse
haw
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
When is a committee a
committee of the governing
body"?
Lighthouse
Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
[T]he CAO Team can be considered a
committee of the Council only if the Council
somehow acted to bring the CAO Team into
being.
' Lighthouse
haw
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
When a governing body directs its staff to
develop a plan of action and the staff
creates a committee to develop the plan, the
staff, not the governing body, has created
the committee.
' Lighthouse
Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
When does a committee " act on
behalf of the governing body"0
?
I
' Lighthouse
haw
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
"We adhere to the clear and
workable definition that a
committee acts on behalf of a
governing body only when the
committee exercises actual or de
facto decision -making authority for
a governing body."
' Lighthouse
LM Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
"To the extent that the team addressed the
substance of the CAO update, nothing in the
record indicates that they did anything more
than gather information, conduct internal
discussions, and provide information to the
Council."
' hawLighthouse
L
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
"As ... the Court of Appeals held, none of
these activities amount to the exercise of
actual or de facto decision -making
authority. Rather, they are consistent with
the role of an informal advisory committee or
administrative staff support."
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County (CoA)
"[d]uring the course of committee meetings,
ideas and policies are brought forward,
discussed, narrowed and discarded and
approaches are formulated
presentations of subcommi
entire Council."
for making
ttee work to the
LM
Lighthouse
Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County (CoA)
"this group was trying to take care of some
of the behind the scenes details so that the
Council —the full Council could focus on
making policy decisions and having
substantive discussions and giving the staff
direction on what they wanted to see."
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County (CoA)
"Even viewed in the light most favorable to
CAPR, these statements do not provide
evidence that the CAO Team exercised
actual or de facto decision making
authority. Rather, they describe an advisory
or information gathering role."
' hawLighthouse
L
Serial Meetings
Lighthouse
L Lawno
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
But [Plaintiff] asserts that a serialized e-mail
and telephone exchange involving members
of the Council constituted a " meeting" of the
Council because four council members were
" present" during the communications. ...The
communications that [Plaintiff] describes as
a "meeting" consisted of two e-mails and a
telephone call that occurred over the course
of a 14—hour period.
Lighthouse
am �Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
Council member Peterson, who did not
attend any of the CAO Team's in -person
meetings, sent the first e-mail on which
[Plaintiff] relies; the recipients were Fralick
and Miller, who were on the CAO Team.
' Lighthouse
Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
Fralick responded to Peterson later the
same day, copying Miller. In his e-mail,
Fralick alluded to a telephone call between
himself and Pratt (another CAO team
member) that apparently had occurred
earlier in the same day. Both the e-mails and
Fralick's summary of the telephone call
reference the CAO update.
Lighthouse
k. �Law
9.7.a
ens Alliance
Peterson I Fralick
Miter
P ratt
Packet Pg. 253
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
These communications did not
constitute a meeting of the Council
because they contain no indication that
the participants had the requisite
collective intent to meet.
IIIFIW LM
Lighthouse
Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
The text of the e-mails do not indicate that
Miller or Peterson were aware of Fralick's
call to Pratt before Fralick sent his e-mail
summarizing it; certainly, the e-mails do not
suggest that Miller or Peterson actually
intended for a telephone call to Pratt to be
part of an otherwise e-mail-based " meeting"
of the Council.
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
Likewise, there is no indication that Pratt
was aware of the e-mails sent by Peterson
or Fralick. Consequently, the
communications cited by [Plaintiff] do not
evidence a collective intent for the four
council members to meet to transact council
business.
Lighthouse
k. �Law
9.7.a
ens Alliance
Peterson I Fralick
Miter
P ratt
Packet Pg. 257
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
Moreover, the record does not contain any
e-mails sent by Miller in this exchange, nor
does it reference any telephone calls in
which Miller participated. Instead, Miller
passively received one e-mail each from
Fralick and Peterson. Because passive
receipt of e-mail does not constitute
participation in a meeting, ... Miller could not
have been part of the ostensible " meeting"
for OPMA purposes.
' L ighthouse
Law
Citizens Alliance v. San Juan County
Without Miller, the communications at issue
involve only three council members —the
same number that participated on the CAO
Team and less than a majority of the full
Council. For these reasons, the e-
mail/telephone exchange did not constitute a
" meeting" of the Council.
' Lighthouse
L haw
Egan v. City of Seattle
Plaintiff " contends city council members
" met" serially between June 9 and June 11,
2018, in small groups or in one-on-one
meetings, telephone calls, e-mails, and text
messages, for the purpose of obtaining a
collective commitment of a majority to vote
in favor of repealing the EHT 3)
Lighthouse
L.L'aw Packet Pg. 260
Egan v. City of Seattle
"To establish that this conduct constitutes an
OPMA violation, [Plaintiff] must show (1) a
majority of the council " met" (2) with the
collective intent to transact official business,
and (3) during the " meeting," the council
members took " action" as defined by the
OPMA—specifically, they discussed or
deliberated on repealing the EHT 11
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Egan v. City of Seattle
"Extending the reasoning of Citizens
Alliance to this case, the in -person
meetings, e-mails, phone calls, and text
messages between and among the city
council members could constitute a
" meeting" under the OPMA if there
was evidence that at least five members (a
quorum) participated in and were aware that
four others were participating in
conversations about repealing the EHT 31
Lighthouses
LawPacket Pg.
Egan v. City of Seattle
[T]here is evidence that ... seven council
members signed on to a draft press release
stating that the EHT repeal bill had "the
support of a majority of the City Council."
' Lighthouse
Law Pg. a263
Egan v. City of Seattle
Each of the seven council members
submitted a declaration in which they stated
that they "did not discuss with any other
[c]ouncilmember the substance of the
statement (whether in draft or final form)"
and that by joining the June 11 press
statement, they "did not understand or
intend that doing so represented or indicated
how [they] would vote with respect to
proposed legislation."
' Lighthouse
Law • -
Egan v. City of Seattle
The text of what each was asked to review
and approve, however, seems to express a
very different sentiment:
We heard you. It is time to hit reset. This week,
instead of prolonging a fight, we are moving
forward with legislation to repeal the current tax
on large businesses to address the
homelessness crisis — this bill has the support of
a majority of the City Council.
' Lighthouse
L Law
Egan v. City of Seattle
There is certainly sufficient evidence to
create a genuine issue of fact as to whether
the council members' decision to approve
this press release constituted a collective
decision on the part of more than five
members to vote to approve the EHT repeal
legislation.
Lighthouse
k. � LawPacket Pg. 266
Egan v. City of Seattle
We thus conclude if a quorum of a legislative
body, such as the City Council, collectively
commits or promises to each other to vote
as agroup—in favor of or in opposition to a
piece of pending legislation at a future public
meeting, then such a commitment may be
evidence that a majority of the body
attended a " meeting" with the collective
intent to take an " action" in violation of the
OPMA.
L' haLighthouse
M w - •
Egan v. City of Seattle
There is sufficient evidence here from which
a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that
the seven members who agreed to join
Mayor Durkan's press statement, indicating
that the pending bill had the support of a
majority of the council, were expressing their
collective decision to vote to repeal the EHT
outside of a public meeting.
Lighthouse
k. � LawPacket Pg. 268
Egan v. City of Seattle
Here, ... there is evidence to suggest that
seven council members privately expressed
to each other their collective intent to vote to
repeal the EHT If each individual council
member "pre-decided," ahead of the June
12 public meeting, how they intended to
vote, that fact would be insufficient to
establish the collective intent to deliberate or
discuss pending legislation.
I Lighthouse
Law �
Egan v. City of Seattle
But if [Plaintiff] can prove that, through their
serial approval of a draft press release, they
" pre -decided" how they intended to vote and
then expressed that intent outside of a public
meeting to a sufficient number of council
members to constitute a quorum, then a trier of
fact could reasonably conclude a majority of the
council " met" with the collective intent to
transact official business —specifically, to
discuss or deliberate on repealing the EHT
Lighthouse
k. � Law - •
M
Conditions on
Attendance
0 Lighthouse
L Law
■
Can conditions be placed on
attendance at council meetings?
A member of the public shall not be
required, as a condition to attendance at a
meeting of a governing body, to register his
or her name and other information, to
complete a questionnaire, or otherwise to
fulfill any condition precedent to his or her
attendance.
RCW 42-30.040
' L ighthouse
Law
Zink v. City of Mesa
We interpret the OPMA as prohibiting
governing bodies from restricting audio or
video recordings as a condition precedent to
attending a public meeting. This is not to say
a governing body cannot exclude a member
of the public who is recording a meeting in a
disruptive manner. But the undisputed facts
show this is not what happened here.
' Lighthouse
Law
Zink v. City of Mesa
The video evidence demonstrates Ms. Zink did
not cause a disturbance when she began
recording. The discussion between Ms. Zink,
Mayor Ross and others was civil and orderly.
There were no threats and the discussion took
place prior to the council's discussion of items
on the agenda.... Ms. Zink's actions did not
constitute an interruption of the council's public
meeting. ...The decision to eject Ms. Zink from
the May 8, 2003, city council meeting was not
reasonable under the circumstances.
' Lighthouse
L Law
Zink v. City of Mesa
Mesa argues that even if a prohibition on
audio and video recordings is an invalid
condition precedent under the OPMA, the
city did not violate the OPMA because the
condition was imposed by the mayor, not the
city's governing body. We disagree. The
mayor was not some sort of a rogue third
party. She was the city's chief executive and
served as a presiding officer of the city
council.
' Lighthouse
L haw
Zink v. City of Mesa
When speaking to the 911 operator, Mayor
Ross used the first person plural " we"
throughout the brief conversation. In addition,
while talking during Ms. Zink's recording,
the mayor made abundantly clear she was
speaking for the council when she directed Ms.
Zink to stop recording. Ms. Zink has therefore
stated a claim that the city of Mesa's governing
body established an invalid condition precedent
on her attendance at a public meeting.
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Zink v. City of Mesa
Unique fact pattern:
This case does not hold that the mayor is
always considered to be part of the
governing body.
' Lighthouse
LawPacket - •
M
9.7.a
�0vernur s
:)roclamatir
i
L
a
a
0
N
ti
O
N
N
O
N
r
C
0
E
t
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 278
OPMA changes due to pandemic
• Gubernatorial proclamation 20-28
• 15 versions, most recent issued on
January 19, 2021
• In effect until termination of state of
emergency
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Proclamation
Prohibition:
Any public agency subject to RCW 42.30 is
prohibited from conducting a public meeting subject
to RCW 42.30 unless (a) the meeting is not
conducted in -person and instead provides an
option(s) for the public to attend the proceedings
through, at minimum, telephonic access, and may
also include other electronic, Internet or other means
of remote access, and (b) provides the ability for all
persons attending the meeting to hear each other at
the same time.
' Lighthouse
L Law
Proclamation
Exemption from Prohibition:
As an exception to the above prohibition,
public agencies holding public meetings
may, at their option and in addition to hosting
the remote meeting elements described
above, include an in -person component to a
public meeting if all of the following
requirements are met:
' hawLighthouse
L
Proclamation
1. The open public meeting complies with
the guidelines for "business meetings",
found in the "Miscellaneous Venues"
guidance here, as incorporated into the
Proclamation 20-25 et seq., Stay Safe —
Stay Healthy - Rollback of County -By -
County Phased Reopening Responding to a
COVID-19 Outbreak Surge; and
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Proclamation
2. Any person wishing to attend in person a
public meeting with an in -person component
must be able to do so at a physical location
meeting the requirements herein, either in a
primary meeting location or an overflow
physical location that provides the ability for
all persons attending the meeting to hear
each other at the same time; and
' Lighthouse
Law283
Proclamation
3. If at any time during a public meeting the
in -person component cannot comply with
each of the requirements herein, the public
meeting (to include the telephonic/remote
access portions) must be recessed until
compliance is restored or if compliance
cannot be restored then adjourned,
continued, or otherwise terminated; and
ihthouse
haw
Proclamation
4. The public agency holding an in -person public
meeting shall accommodate, to the extent
practicable, those wishing to participate in and/or
attend the public meeting (to include the press) by
allowing persons to attend the meeting by listening
and speaking through operable telecommunications
devices (examples include using an attendee's cell
phone with service to connect to a conference calling
service, or allowing persons to call in using an
attendee's cell phone with service); and
' Lighthouse
Law - •
miscellaneous
(part 2 starts here)
Lighthouse
L yaw:
What if action is taken at a closed
meeting?
Any action taken at meetings failing to
comply with the provisions of this subsection
shall be null and void.
RCW 42-30-060
' Lighthouse
haw
Voting
No governing body of a public agency at any
meeting required to be open to the public
shall vote by secret ballot.
RCW 42-30-060
' Lighthouse
Law Packet Pg. 2
Location
".. . meetings of the governing body need not
be heia within the boundaries of the territory
over which the public agency exercises
jurisdiction."
RCW 42-30.070
Lighthouse
k. � LawPacket Pg. 289
Special meeting notice
"Shall specify the time and place of the
special meeting and the business to be
transacted. final disposition shall not b..
taKen o, anv other ratter at such meetings
by the governing body."
RCW 42-30-080
' Lighthouse
LO � LawPacket a
Final disposition = final action?
"Final action" means a collective positive or
negative decision, or an actual rotF by a
majority of the members of a governing body
when sitting as a body or entity, upon a
motion, proposal, resolution, order, or
ordinance.
RCW 42-30-080
Lighthouse
Law
Adjournments
The governing body of a public agency may
adjourn any regular, adjourned regular,
special, or adjourned special meeting to a
time and place specified in the order of
adjournment. Less than a quorum may so
adjourn from time to time.
RCW 42-30-090
' L ighthouse
Law
9.7.a
Am
:46"1 *"1 [o
i
L
a
a
0
N
ti
O
N
N
O
N
r
C
0
E
t
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 293
Executive Sessions
Nothing contained in this chapter may be
construed to prevent a governing body from
holding an executive session during a
regular or special meeting:
RCW 42.30.110
' Lighthouse
haw
Executive Sessions - real estates
acquisition
(b) To consider the selection of a site or the
acquisition of real estate by lease or
purchase when public knowledge regarding
nsideration would cause a likelihood
used price;
RCW 42-30-110
Lighthouse
Law
Executive Sessions - real estates
disposition
(c) To consider the minimum price at which
real estate will be offered for sale or lease
when public knowledge regarding such
consideration would cause a likelihood of
decreased price. However, final action
selling or leasing public property shall be
taken in a meeting open to the public;
RCW 42.30.110
' Lighthouse
haw
Executive Sessions — complaints
(f) To receive and evaluate complaints or
charges brought against a uublic ►mt,er or
employee. However, upon the request of
such officer or employee, a public hearing or
a meeting
open
to the
public shall be
conducted
upon
such
complaint or charge;
RCW 42-30-110
Lighthouse
k. �Law
Executive Sessions - employee
qualifications
(g) To evaluate the qualifications of an
applicant ror public employment or to review
the performance of a public employee.
RCW 42.30.110
' Lighthouse
haw
Executive Sessions — offices
qualifications
(h) To evaluate the qualifications of a
candidateTor mpointment to elective office.
However, any interview of such candidate
and final action appointing a candidate to
elective office shall be in a meeting open to
the public;
RCW 42-30.110
' Lighthouse
LO � LawPg. 299
Executive Sessions
attorney/client
To discuss with legal counsel representing the
agency matters relating to agency enforcement
actions, or to discuss with legal counsel
representing the agency litigation r potential
litigation to which the agency, the governing
body, or a member acting in an official capacity
is, or is likely to become, a party, when public
knowledge regaraing the discussion is likely to
result in an adverse legal or financial
consequence to the agency.
RCW 42-30.110
' Lighthouse
Law
"Potential litigation" means
(i) Litigation that has been specifically threatened to which the
agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an
official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party;
Litigation that the agency reasonably believes may be
commencec.. by or against the agency, the governing body,
or a member acting in an official capacity; or
Litigation or legal risks of a proposed action or current
practices that the agency has identified when public
discussior of the litigation or legal risks is likely to result in
an adverse legal or financial consequencE to the agency;
Lighthouse il
k= � Law Packet - •
Executive session -- process
Before convening in executive session, the
presiding officer of a governing body shall
publicly announce the purposu for excluding
the public from the meeting place, ana the
time when the PXecutive seGGinn will hp -
concluded. The executive session may be
extended to a stated later time by
announcement of the presiding officer.
RCW 42-30-110(2)
' Lighthouse
Law - •
Other exceptions to OPMA
"... this chapter shall not apply to:
(2) That portion of a meeting of aquasi-judicial body which
relates to aquasi-judicial matter between named parties as
distinguished from a matter having general effect on the public or
on a class or group; or
(4)(b) that portion of a meeting during which the governing body
is planning or adopting the strategy or position to be taken by the
governing body during the course of any collective bargaining,
professional negotiations, or grievance or mediation
proceedings, or reviewing the proposals made in the
negotiations or proceedings while in progress.
RCW 42.30.140
L ighthouse
Law
9.7.a
ol Nooll [o
i
L
a
a
O
N
ti
O
N
N
O
N
r
C
0
E
t
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 304
Violations
(1) Each member of the governing body who
ttends a meeting of such governing body
where action is taken in violation of any
provision of this chapter applicable to him or
her, with knowledge of the fact that the meeting
is in violation thereof, shall be subject to
personal liability in the form of a civil penalty in
the amount of one nundred dollars.
RCW 42.30.120 1
r L,3htho��ol
Other possible consequences?
• Action rendered null and void
• Attorneys fees paid by city
• Recall
' Lighthouse
Lm � Law
2022 Legislation
Lighthouse
L Law07
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 2
amends 42-30-010
The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty
to the agencies which serve them. The people, in
delegating authority, do not give their public servants
the right to decide what is good for the people to
know and what is not good for them to know. The
people insist on remaining informed and informing
the people's public servants of their views so that
they may retain control over the instruments they
have created. For these reasons, even when not
required by law, public agencies are encouraged to
incorporate and accept public comment during their
decision -making process.
' Lighthouse
L Law
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 3
amends 42.30.030
(2) Public agencies are encouraged to
provide for the increased ability of the public
to observe and participate in the meetings of
governing bodies through real-time
telephonic, electronic, Internet, or other
readily available means of remote access
that do not require an additional cost to
access the meeting.
Lighthouse
k. �Law
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 5(1)
New section to address declared
emergencies like COVID-19:
• reasonable safety standard
• OPTIONS
— Remote only; no physical location
— In person meeting but without some or all of
the public
' Lighthouse
Law
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 5(2)
Requirements for remote meetings:
• Real-time verbal communication by
members
Requirements for remote / limited
attendance meetings:
• Public listening by free readily available
means
L g hthouse
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 5(3)
No action without public listening except
executive sessions.
' Lighthouse
km � haw
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 5(4)
Notice must include instructions on how the
public may listen live to proceedings and on
how the public may access any other
electronic means of remote access offered
by the public agency.
' hawLighthouse
L
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 5(5)
Nothing in this section alters the ability of
public agencies ... to have members of a
governing body participate in a meeting
remotely with no declared emergency.
' Lighthouse
haw
ESHB 1329 — Sec. (i
amends 42-30-040
A member of the public shall not be required, as a
condition to attendance at a meeting of a governing
body, to register his or her name and other
information, to complete a questionnaire, or
otherwise to fulfill any condition precedent to his or
her attendance. This section does not prohibit any
generally applicable conditions determined by the
governing body to be reasonably necessary to
protect the public health or safety, or to protect
against interruption of the meeting, including a
meeting at which the physical attendance by some
or all members of the public is limited due to a
declared emergency.
' Lighthouse
Law - •
ESHB 1329 — Sec.
amends 42.30.050
Adds:
Nothing in this section prohibits the
governing body from stopping people from
speaking to the governing body when not
recognized by the governing body to speak.
' Lighthouse
haw
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 8
amends 42.30.070
If, by reason of fire, flood, earthquake, or other
emergency, there is a need for expedited action
by a governing body to meet the emergency,
the presiding officer of the governing body may
provide for a meeting site other than the regular
meeting site, for a remote meeting without a
physical location, or for a meeting at which the
physical attendance by some or all members of
the public is limited due to a declared
emergency, and the notice requirements of this
chapter shall be suspended during such
emergency.
Lighthouse
k. �Law
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 10(4)
amends 42.30-070
(4) The notices provided in this section may be
dispensed with in the event a special meeting is
called to deal with an emergency involving
injury or damage to persons or property or the
likelihood of such injury or damage, when time
requirements of such notice would make notice
impractical and increase the likelihood of such
injury or damage, or when the required notice
cannot be posted or displayed with reasonable
safety, including but not limited to declared
emergencies in which travel to physically post
notice is barred or advised against.
' Lighthouse
haw - •
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 11
amends 42.30.090
((NAlho-nownr%wi)) Except in the case of remote
meetings without a physical location as
provided for in this chapter, whenever any
meeting is adjourned a copy of the order or
notice of adjournment shall be
conspicuously posted immediately after the
time of the adjournment on or near the door
of the place where the regular, adjourned
regular, special, or adjourned special
meeting was held.
Lighthouse
k. �Law
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 13(1)�
NEW
(1) Except in an emergency situation, the governing
body of a public agency shall provide an opportunity
at or before every regular meeting at which final
action is taken for public comment. The public
comment required under this section may be taken
orally at a public meeting, or by providing an
opportunity for written testimony to be submitted
before or at the meeting. If the governing body
accepts written testimony, this testimony must be
distributed to the governing body. The governing
body may set a reasonable deadline for the
submission of written testimony before the meeting.
' Lighthouse
Law - •
ESHB 1329 — Sec. 13(2)',
NEW
(2) Upon the request of any individual who will
have difficulty attending a meeting of the
governing body of a public a?(or
ency by reason of
disability, limited mobility, or any other
reason that makes physical attendance at a
meeting difficult, the governing body shall,
when feasible, provide an opportunity for that
individual to provide oral comment at the
meeting remotely if oral comment from other
members of the public will be accepted at the
meeting.
Lighthouse
haw - •
Questions?
0 LighthL yawou�
9.8
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/26/2022
Repeal of safe gun storage and related laws after Washington Supreme Court's field preemption ruling
Staff Lead: City Attorney
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Nicholas Falk
Background/History
N/A
Recommendation
Repeal Ordinance 4120 and 4131 because they are preempted by state law. Also repeal Ordinance 4121
so that the city code does not reference a section that has been repealed.
Narrative
On July 24, 2018, the Edmonds City Council adopted Ordinance 4120. This ordinance established certain
regulations related to the safe storage of firearms, which were subsequently codified in chapter 5.26 of
the Edmonds City Code. On July 24, 2018, the Edmonds City Council also adopted Ordinance 4121.
Ordinance 4121 amended the city's regulations related to the reporting of lost or stolen firearms, which
are codified in chapter 5.24 of the Edmonds City Code. Ordinance 4121 references a portion of chapter
5.26 ECC. On October 23, 2018, the Edmonds City Council adopted Ordinance 4131. Ordinance 4131
amended Ordinances 4120 and 4121 to further define what constitutes a proper locking device under
those ordinances.
Ordinance 4120 was challenged in a lawsuit filed on August 7, 2018 by Brett Bass, Swan Seaberg, The
Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., and The National Rifle Association of America, Inc. On October 18,
2019, on preemption grounds, the superior court issued an injunction requiring that RCW 5.26.020 be
repealed if the city does not prevail in its appeal. The superior court also ruled that plaintiffs did not
have standing to challenge ECC 5.26.030. The case was cross -appealed to the court of appeals, and
ultimately the supreme court.
The Washington Supreme Court, filed an opinion (attached) (Bass v. City of Edmonds, 199 Wash.2d 403)
on April 21, 2022 in which it held that chapter 5.26 ECC is preempted by state law, specifically RCW
9.41.290. It also reversed the superior court with respect to the plaintiffs' standing to challenge ECC
5.26.030.
RCW 9.41.290, which was adopted in 1983 and was last amended in 1994 states as follows:
The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation
within the boundaries of the state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale,
acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms, or any other element relating to firearms
or parts thereof, including ammunition and reloader components. Cities, towns, and counties or other
municipalities may enact only those laws and ordinances relating to firearms that are specifically
authorized by state law, as in RCW 9.41.300, and are consistent with this chapter. Such local ordinances
Packet Pg. 323
9.8
shall have the same penalty as provided for by state law. Local laws and ordinances that are inconsistent
with, more restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state law shall not be enacted and are
preempted and repealed, regardless of the nature of the code, charter, or home rule status of such city,
town, county, or municipality.
The legislature could repeal or amend RCW 9.41.290 to allow ordinances like 4120 and 4131 to no
longer be preempted. But unless and until that happens, they are preempted.
It should be noted that these ordinances were not found to violate the 2nd Amendment of the United
States Constitution, only the Washington Constitution, and only on the grounds that RCW 9.41.290
preempts the entire field of firearms regulation.
Procedurally speaking, the Washington Supreme Court sent the case back to the Snohomish County
Superior Court with its May 13, 2022 mandate (attached) "for further proceedings in accordance with
the attached true copy of the opinion."
This ordinance was discussed during the PSPHSP special committee meeting of July 18, 2022.
Attachments:
Ordinance 4120
Ordinance 4121
Ordinance 4131
2019.10.18 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Summary Judgment 4840-8366-5834
v.1
2022-04-21 99596-6 Opinion
- 995966 - Public - Disposition - Mandate - - 5 13 2022
2022-07-07 safe gun storage repealer
Packet Pg. 324
9.8.a
ORIDINANCE NO.4120
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF AND
ACCESS TO FIREARMS.
WHEREAS, in 2015, 714 Washington State residents died from a firearm injury and a
child or teen under the age of 17 was killed by gunfire in every nine days, on average, according
to WA State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics Death Certificate data; and
WHEREAS, suicide is the leading cause of firearm death in Washington State according
to the WA State Department of Health. In 2015, 47% of all those who took their own lives —
used a firearm; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Bureau of Justice Statistics estimated an average of at least
232,000 guns were stolen per year from 2005 to 2010; and
WHEREAS, the US Secret Service and US Department of Education published a study
examining school shootings from 1974-2000 that found that in more than 65% of cases, the
shooter obtained the firearm from their home or that of a relative.
WHEREAS, 63% of firearm -owning households in Washington state do not store their
firearms locked and unloaded, according to 2018 research led by the University of Washington
School of Public Health; and
WHEREAS, among firearm -owning households, keeping firearms unlocked have been
associated with a greater risk of firearm suicide among both youths and adults; and
WHEREAS, according to 2018 RAND corporation analysis of firearm policies
throughout the United States available evidence supports the conclusion that safe storage laws,
reduce self-inflicted fatal or nonfatal firearm injuries among youth, as well as unintentional
firearm injuries or deaths among children; and
WHEREAS, the Center for Disease Control states safe firearm storage practices —such as
keeping guns secured with a cable lock or in a gun safe —reduce the risk of firearm injuries; and
Packet Pg. 325
9.8.a
WHEREAS, in 2012, the Washington State Division One Court of Appeals recognized
the potential for liability in a negligence action when a firearm owner allows an individual who
may be at -risk of misusing a weapon to have access to that weapon while in the weapon -owner's
home; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Washington has expressed a public policy that
third -parties should avoid allowing firearms to come into the possession of persons who would
be ineligible to obtain such weapons under RCW 9.41.040, including minors in most
circumstances; and
WHEREAS the people of the State of Washington enacted by initiative the "Extreme
Risk Protection Order Act," now RCW Chapter 7.94, allowing family, household members, and
law enforcement to petition a court to remove firearms from at -risk individuals; and
WHEREAS the City of Edmonds recognizes the grave harm that could occur when an
unlocked firearm is used by someone other than the firearm's rightful owner, such as when an
unlocked firearm is stolen and used by a third -party to perpetrate a crime; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A new Chapter 5.26 is added to the Edmonds City Code as follows:
Chapter 5.26 STORAGE OF FIREARMS
5.26.010 Definitions
For purposes of this Chapter 5.26, the following definitions apply:
A. "At -risk person" means any person who has made statements or exhibited behavior
that indicates to a reasonable person there is a likelihood that the person is at risk of
attempting suicide or causing physical harm to oneself or others.
B. "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be
fired by an explosive such as gunpowder, including but not limited to any machine gun,
pistol, rifle, short -barreled rifle, short -barreled shotgun, or shotgun as those terms are
defined in RCW 9.41.010. "Firearm" does not include a flare gun or other pyrotechnic
2
Packet Pg. 326
9.8.a
visual distress signaling device, or a powder -actuated tool or other device designed solely
to be used for construction purposes.
C. "Lawfully authorized user" means any person who:
1. Is not in the unlawful possession of a firearm under RCW 9.41.040; and
2. Is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under any other state or federal law;
and
3. Has the express permission of the owner to possess and use the firearm.
D. "Locking device" includes any cable lock, barrel lock, storage container, or other
device approved of or meeting specifications established by the Chief of Police by rule
promulgated in accordance with Chapter 5.26.
E. "Minor" means a person under 18 years of age who is not authorized under RCW
9.41.042 to possess a firearm, or a person of at least 18 but less than 21 years of age who
does not meet the requirements of RCW 9.41.240.
F. "Prohibited person" means any person who is not a lawfully authorized user.
5.26.020 Safe storage of firearms
It shall be a civil infraction for any person to store or keep any firearm in any premises
unless such weapon is secured by a locking device, properly engaged so as to render such
weapon inaccessible or unusable to any person other than the owner or other lawfully
authorized user.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Section 5.26.020, such weapon shall
be deemed lawfully stored or lawfully kept if carried by or under the control of the owner
or other lawfully authorized user.
5.26.030 Unauthorized access prevention
Packet Pg. 327
9.8.a
It shall be a civil infraction if any person knows or reasonably should know that a minor,
an at -risk person, or a prohibited person is likely to gain access to a firearm belonging to
or under the control of that person, and a minor, an at -risk person, or a prohibited person
obtains the firearm.
5.26.040 Penalties
A. A violation of Section 5.26.020 shall constitute a civil infraction subject to a civil fine
or forfeiture not to exceed $500. For good cause shown, the court may provide for the
performance of community restitution, in lieu of the fine or forfeiture imposed under this
subsection 5.26.040.A.
B. A violation of Section 5.26.020 or 5.26.030 shall constitute a civil infraction subject to
a civil fine or forfeiture in an amount up to $1,000 if a prohibited person, an at -risk
person, or a minor obtains a firearm as a result of the violation. For good cause shown,
the court may provide for the performance of community restitution, in lieu of the fine or
forfeiture imposed under this subsection 5.26.040.B.
C. A violation of Section 5.26.020 or 5.26.030 shall constitute a civil infraction subject to
a civil fine or forfeiture in an amount up to $10,000 if a prohibited person, an at -risk
person, or a minor obtains an unsecured firearm and uses it to injure or cause the death of
oneself or others, or uses the firearm in connection with a crime. A separate civil fine or
forfeiture may be issued for each instance that a person that is injured or killed as a result
of a violation of Section 5.26.020 or 5.26.030.
D. A violation of Section 5.26.020 or 5.26.030 is hereby deemed at minimum negligent
and may be considered reckless depending upon the knowledge and actions of the
violator.
E. Nothing in this Chapter 5.26 shall be construed to alter any requirements, including,
but not limited to, any warrant requirements applicable under the Fourth Amendment to
the United States Constitution or Article I, Section 7 of the Washington State
Constitution.
0
Packet Pg. 328
9.8.a
F. Sections 5.26.020 and 5.26.030 shall not apply to "antique firearms," as defined in
RCW 9.41.010.
5.26.050 Notice of infraction —Issuance
A. A peace officer has the authority to issue a notice of infraction:
1. When an infraction under this Chapter 5.26 is committed in the officer's
presence;
2. If an officer has reasonable cause to believe that a person has committed an
infraction under this Chapter 5.26.
B. A court may issue a notice of infraction upon receipt of a written statement of the
officer that there is reasonable cause to believe that an infraction was committed.
5.26.060 Response to notice of infraction —Contesting determination —Hearing —
Failure to appear
A. Any person who receives a notice of infraction shall respond to such notice as
provided in this section within 15 days of the date the notice is personally served or, if the
notice is served by mail, within 18 days of the date the notice is mailed.
B. If the person determined to have committed the infraction does not contest the
determination the person shall respond by completing the appropriate portion of the
notice of infraction and submitting it, either by mail or in person, to the Edmonds
Municipal Court. A check or money order in the amount of the penalty prescribed for the
infraction must be submitted with the response, if responding by mail, or if responding
online, payment may be made using a credit card. When a response that does not contest
the determination is received, an appropriate order shall be entered in the court's records.
C. If the person determined to have committed the infraction wishes to contest the
determination the person shall respond by completing the portion of the notice of
infraction requesting a hearing and submitting it, either by mail or in person, to the
Packet Pg. 329
9.8.a
Edmonds Municipal Court. The court shall notify the person in writing of the time, place,
and date of the hearing, and that date shall not be sooner than seven days from the date of
the notice, except by agreement.
D. If the person determined to have committed the infraction does not contest the
determination but wishes to explain mitigating circumstances surrounding the infraction,
the person shall respond by completing the portion of the notice of infraction requesting a
hearing for that purpose and submitting it, either by mail or in person, to the Edmonds
Municipal Court. The court shall notify the person in writing of the time, place, and date
of the hearing.
E. In any hearing conducted pursuant to subsections 5.26.060.0 or 5.26.060.1), the court
may defer findings, or in a hearing to explain mitigating circumstances may defer entry
of its order, for up to one year and impose conditions upon the defendant the court deems
appropriate. Upon deferring findings, the court may assess costs as the court deems
appropriate for administrative processing. If at the end of the deferral period the
defendant has met all conditions and has not been determined to have committed another
infraction under this Chapter 5.26, the court may dismiss the infraction. A person may
not receive more than one Deferral within a seven-year period.
F. If any person issued a notice of infraction:
1. Fails to respond to the notice of infraction as provided in subsection
5.26.060.13; or
2. Fails to appear at a hearing requested pursuant to subsections 5.26.060.0 or
5.26.060.D; the court shall enter an appropriate order assessing the monetary
penalty prescribed for the infraction and any other penalty authorized by this
Chapter 10.79.
5.26.070 Hearing —Contesting determination that infraction committed —Appeal
C�
Packet Pg. 330
9.8.a
A. A hearing held for the purpose of contesting the determination that an infraction has
been committed shall be without a jury.
B. The court may consider the notice of infraction and any other written report made
under oath submitted by the officer who issued the notice or whose written statement was
the basis for the issuance of the notice in lieu of the officer's personal appearance at the
hearing. The person named in the notice may subpoena witnesses, including the officer,
and has the right to present evidence and examine witnesses present in court.
C. The burden of proof is upon the City to establish the commission of the infraction by a
preponderance of the evidence.
D. After consideration of the evidence and argument, the court shall determine whether
the infraction was committed. Where it has not been established that the infraction was
committed, an order dismissing the notice shall be entered in the court's records. Where it
has been established that the infraction was committed, an appropriate order shall be
entered in the court's records.
E. An appeal from the court's determination or order shall be to the Superior Court. The
decision of the Superior Court is subject only to discretionary review pursuant to Rule 2.3
of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this
ordinance, or the invalidity of its application to any person or circumstance, does not
affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance or the validity of its application to
other persons or circumstances.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect
thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance. Once effective, this ordinance shall
not be enforced until one hundred eighty (180) days after final passage.
7
Packet Pg. 331
9.8.a
APPR ED:
PQ, e gn
MA Q DAVE VARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
5�;:;
CI LERK, SCOTT SSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JAFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: July 20, 2018
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: July 24, 2018
PUBLISHED: July 29, 2018
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 23, 2018
ORDINANCE NO. 4120
Packet Pg. 332
9.8.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4120
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 24 h day of July, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No.
4120. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF AND ACCESS
TO FIREARMS.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 251h day of July, 2018.
C LERK,-S ASSEY
I
Packet Pg. 333
9.8.a
Everett Daily Herald
Affidavit of Publication
State of Washington }
County of Snohomish } ss
Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the first publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH818914 ORDINANCE
4118-4121 as it was published in the regular and
entire issue of said paper and not as a
supplement form thereof for a period of 1
issue(s), such publication commencing on
07/29/2018 and ending on 07/29/2018 and that
said newspaper was regularly distributed to its
subscribers during all of said period.
The amount of the fee for such publication is
$61.92.
Subscribed and sworn fore me on this
day of
Not ry Public in and for the State o[
Washington.
City of Edmonds -LEGAL ADS 114101416
SCOTT PASSEY
Urxis PhfllfpsNota
of W�+c
Myap �ngton
- AIXRt nsEV 93Q8r2Wj Zn,
Packet Pg. 334
9.8.a
Classified Proof
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
of she City of Edmonds. WMIringlon
On the 24th day of July. 2018. Ilse Onv Coimrlf of the City of
Edmonds, Mood Ina following Ofdlnun(mli. the sumnlana6 of sold
pff,Ialtances cornslMmg of tl8ea am Dlovided as follows:
ORDIH�NCE. NO. 4118
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON. AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4109 AS A
RESULT OF UNANTiOIPATED TRANSFERS AND
F%PENDi'ruRES OF vARIOUS FUNDS, AND MING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE
ORDINANCE NO, 4119
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE
YOST HOUSE LOCATED AT 658 MAPLE STREET.
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE
EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AND
DIRECTING THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
OR DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN "HR" DESIGNATION.,
AND FIXING A TIMF WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOMIE
EFFECTIVE.
ORDINANCE NO. 4120
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF
AND ACCESS TO FIREARMS
ORDINANCE NO 4121
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF LOST
OR STOLEN FIREARMS, INCREASING THE MAXIMUM
PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO REPORT A LOST OR STOLEN
RRF-4RM, ADDING LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS AND
DEFENSES REI.ARDING COMPLIANCE OR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH SECTION 524.070 OF THE EDMONDS
CITY CODE
The fun text of these Ordinances will be mailed upon request
DATED this 251h day of July, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
POmhod: July 29, 2018, EDH818914
Proofed by Sheppard, Dicy, 07/30/2018 09:30:52 am Page: 2
Packet Pg. 335
9.8.b
ORDINANCE NO.4121
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF LOST
OR STOLEN FIREARMS; INCREASING THE MAXIMUM
PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO REPORT A LOST OR STOLEN
FIREARM; ADDING LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS AND
DEFENSES REGARDING COMPLIANCE OR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH SECTION 5.24.070 OF THE EDMONDS CITY
CODE
WHEREAS, the city council would like to further strengthen Ordinance 4060, which it
adopted in 2017; and
WHEREAS, the city council would like to provide additional procedures for the
enforcement of Ordinance 4060; and
WHEREAS, the recitals from Ordinance 4060 should be incorporated herein by this
reference; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 5.24.070 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Reporting theft or loss of
firearm required," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted
text is shown in strike -through):
5.24.070 Reporting theft or loss of firearm required.
A. If a firearm is lost or stolen, the person who owned or was in possession of the firearm
shall report the theft or loss to the Edmonds Police Department if the loss or theft
occurred in Edmonds. The report shall be made within 24 hours after the theft or loss is
first discovered, and shall include to the extent known:
1. The firearm's caliber, make, model, manufacturer, and serial number;
2. Any other distinguishing number or identification mark on the firearm; and
1
Packet Pg. 336
9.8.b
3. The circumstances of the loss or theft, including the date, place, and manner.
B. On receipt of a report of a stolen or lost firearm under this section, the Edmonds Police
Department shall enter into the National Crime Information Center Database the
following information, to the extent known:
1. The firearm's caliber, make, model, manufacturer, and serial number; and
2. Any other distinguishing number or identification mark on the firearm.
C. Any violation of or failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall
constitute a civil infraction and shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $590-i ,000.
D. If a lost or stolen firearm is used by a third party to injure or kill. another:
1. The failure to comply with subsection 5.24.070.A is prima facie evidence of
ne&Iigence, but
2. The proper use of measures to safely store or keep a firearm — including
securing it with a locking device, approved of or meeting specifications
established by the Chief of Police by rule promulgated in accordance with
Chapter 5.26 ECC properly en a ed so as to render such weapon inaccessible or
unusable to any person other than the owner or other lawfully authorized user
is an affirmative defense to a claim of negligence. For purposes of this subsection
5.24.070.D.2 "lawfully authorized user" means any 12erson who:
a. Is not in the unlawful possession of a firearm under RCW 9.41.040; and
b. Is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under any other state or
federal law, and
c. Has the express permission of the owner to possess and use the firearm.
Section 2. A new Section 5.24.75 is hereby added to the Edmonds City Code to read as follows:
5.24.075 Notice of infraction —Issuance
2
Packet Pg. 337
9.8.b
A. A peace officer has the authority to issue a notice of infraction:
1. When an infraction under this Chapter 5.24 is committed in the officer's
presence;
2. If an officer has reasonable cause to believe that a person has committed an
infraction under this Chapter 5.24.
B. A court may issue a notice of infraction upon receipt of a written statement of the
officer that there is reasonable cause to believe that an infraction was committed.
Section 3. A new Section 5.24.080 is hereby added to the Edmonds City Code to read as follows:
5.24.080 Response to notice of infraction —Contesting determination —Hearing —
Failure to appear
A. Any person who receives a notice of infraction shall respond to such notice as
provided in this section within 15 days of the date of the notice is personally served or, if
the notice is served by mail, within 18 days of the date the notice is mailed.
B. If the person determined to have committed the infraction does not contest the
determination the person shall respond by completing the appropriate portion of the
notice of infraction and submitting it, either by mail or in person, to the Edmonds
Municipal Court. A check or money order in the amount of the penalty prescribed for the
infraction must be submitted with the response, if responding by mail, or if responding
online payment may be made using a credit card. When a response that does not contest
the determination is received, an appropriate order shall be entered in the court's records.
C. If the person determined to have committed the infraction wishes to contest the
determination the person shall respond by completing the portion of the notice of
infraction requesting a hearing and submitting it, either by mail or in person, to the
Edmonds Municipal Court. The court shall notify the person in writing of the time, place,
and date of the hearing, and that date shall not be sooner than seven days from the date of
the notice, except by agreement.
3
Packet Pg. 338
9.8.b
D. If the person determined to have committed the infraction does not contest the
determination but wishes to explain mitigating circumstances surrounding the infraction,
the person shall respond by completing the portion of the notice of infraction requesting a
hearing for that purpose and submitting it, either by mail or in person, to the Edmonds
Municipal Court. The court shall notify the person in writing of the time, place, and date
of the hearing.
E. In any hearing conducted pursuant to subsections 5.24.080.0 or 5.24.080.1), the court
may defer findings, or in a hearing to explain mitigating circumstances may defer entry
of its order for up to one year and impose conditions upon the defendant the court deems
appropriate. Upon deferring findings, the court may assess costs as the court deems
appropriate for administrative processing. If at the end of the deferral period the
defendant has met all conditions and has not been determined to have committed another
infraction under this Chapter 5.24, the court may dismiss the infraction. A person may
not receive more than one deferral within a seven-year period.
F. If any person issued a notice of infraction:
1. Fails to respond to the notice of infraction as provided in subsection
5.24.080.13; or
2. Fails to appear at a hearing requested pursuant to subsections 5.24.080.0 or
5.24.080.D; the court shall enter an appropriate order assessing the monetary
penalty prescribed for the infraction and any other penalty authorized by this
Chapter 5.24.
Section 4. A new Section 5.24.085 is hereby added to the Edmonds City Code to read as follows:
5.24.085 Hearing —Contesting determination that infraction committed —Appeal
A. A hearing held for the purpose of contesting the determination that an infraction has
been committed shall be without a jury.
B. The court may consider the notice of infraction and any other written report made
under oath submitted by the officer who issued the notice or whose written statement was
.19
Packet Pg. 339
9.8.b
the basis for the issuance of the notice in lieu of the officer's personal appearance at the
hearing. The person named in the notice may subpoena witnesses, including the officer,
and has the right to present evidence and examine witnesses present in court.
C. The burden of proof is upon the City to establish the commission of the infraction by a
preponderance of the evidence.
D. After consideration of the evidence and argument, the court shall determine whether
the infraction was committed. Where it has not been established that the infraction was
committed, an order dismissing the notice shall be entered in the court's records. Where it
has been established that the infraction was committed, an appropriate order shall be
entered in the court's records.
E. An appeal from the court's determination or order shall be to the Superior Court. The
decision of the Superior Court is subject only to discretionary review pursuant to Rule 2.3
of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance
should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty
(30) days after final passage of this ordinance. Once effective, this ordinance shall not be
enforced until one hundred eighty (180) days after final passage.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
SCOTT PAS SEY
APPKOVED:
5
MIN 97.111FA Q V.11 3 a I M
Packet Pg. 340
9.8.b
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
E F TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: July 20, 2018
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: July 24, 2018
PUBLISHED: July 29, 2018
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 23, 2018
ORDINANCE NO. 4121
0
Packet Pg. 341
9.8.b
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4121
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 24 h day of July, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No.
4121. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF LOST
OR STOLEN FIREARMS; INCREASING THE MAXIMUM
PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO REPORT A LOST OR STOLEN
FIREARM; ADDING LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS AND
DEFENSES REGARDING COMPLIANCE OR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH SECTION 5.24.070 OF THE EDMONDS CITY
CODE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 251" day of July, 2018.
CI LERK, SC SSEY
7
Packet Pg. 342
9.8.b
Everett Daily Herald
Affidavit of Publication
State of Washington }
County of Snohomish } ss
Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the first publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH818914 ORDINANCE
4118-4121 as it was published in the regular and
entire issue of said paper and not as a
supplement form thereof for a period of 1
issue(s), such publication commencing on
07/29/2018 and ending on 07/29/2018 and that
said newspaper was regularly distributed to its
subscribers during all of said period.
The amount of the fee for such publication is
$61.92.
Subscribed and sworn fore me on this
day of
Not ry Public in and for the State o[
Washington.
City of Edmonds -LEGAL ADS 114101416
SCOTT PASSEY
Urxis PhfllfpsNota
of W�+c
Myap �ngton
- AIXRt nsEV 93Q8r2Wj Zn,
Packet Pg. 343
9.8.b
Classified Proof
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
of she City of Edmonds. WMIringlon
On the 24th day of July. 2018. Ilse Onv Coimrlf of the City of
Edmonds, Mood Ina following Ofdlnun(mli. the sumnlana6 of sold
pff,Ialtances cornslMmg of tl8ea am Dlovided as follows:
ORDIH�NCE. NO. 4118
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON. AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4109 AS A
RESULT OF UNANTiOIPATED TRANSFERS AND
F%PENDi'ruRES OF vARIOUS FUNDS, AND MING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE
ORDINANCE NO, 4119
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE
YOST HOUSE LOCATED AT 658 MAPLE STREET.
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE
EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AND
DIRECTING THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
OR DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN "HR" DESIGNATION.,
AND FIXING A TIMF WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOMIE
EFFECTIVE.
ORDINANCE NO. 4120
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF
AND ACCESS TO FIREARMS
ORDINANCE NO 4121
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF LOST
OR STOLEN FIREARMS, INCREASING THE MAXIMUM
PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO REPORT A LOST OR STOLEN
RRF-4RM, ADDING LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS AND
DEFENSES REI.ARDING COMPLIANCE OR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH SECTION 524.070 OF THE EDMONDS
CITY CODE
The fun text of these Ordinances will be mailed upon request
DATED this 251h day of July, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
POmhod: July 29, 2018, EDH818914
Proofed by Sheppard, Dicy, 07/30/2018 09:30:52 am Page: 2
Packet Pg. 344
9.8.c
ORIDINANCE NO. 4131
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF
AND ACCESS TO FIREARMS, RELATING TO THE
REPORTING OF LOST OR STOLEN FIREARMS, AMENDING
ORDINANCES 4120 AND 4121, AND DEFINING "LOCKING
DEVICE" BY INCORPORATING A LIST OF APPROVED
DEVICES
WHEREAS, earlier this year, the city council adopted Ordinance 4120, AN
ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF AND ACCESS TO FIREARMS,
and Ordinance 4121, AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF LOST OR
STOLEN FIREARMS; INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO
REPORT A LOST OR STOLEN FIREARM; ADDING LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS AND
DEFENSES REGARDING COMPLIANCE OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SECTION
5.24.070 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4120 called for the Chief of Police to promulgate a rule defining
locking device; and
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police and the City Attorney have recommended that the City
incorporate the state of California's list of approved locking devices to satisfy the definition of
"locking device" called for in the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, incorporation of the state of California's list will provide gun owners with a
specific list of devices that one may use to comply with the terms of the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the list of approved devices incorporates a wide range of products at
various price points; and
WHEREAS, including this definition of "locking device" in the city code, as opposed to
having it promulgated by rule, may make the definition easier to find on the internet; and
WHEREAS, to ensure that there is sufficient time for gun owners to comply with the
provisions of these ordinances, the city council would like to extend the non -enforcement period
of Ordinances 4120 and 4121 by sixty days so that they cannot be enforced until 240 days after
passage, which would be March 21, 2019; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 5.26.010, of the Edmonds City Code, entitled, "Definitions," is hereby
amended to read as follows (deleted text is shown in strikethrough; new text is shown in
underline):
Packet Pg. 345
9.8.c
5.26.010 Definitions
For purposes of this Chapter 5.26, the following definitions apply:
A. "At -risk person" means any person who has made
statements or exhibited behavior that indicates to a reasonable
person there is a likelihood that the person is at risk of attempting
suicide or causing physical harm to oneself or others.
B. "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a
projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as
gunpowder, including but not limited to any machine gun, pistol,
rifle, short -barreled rifle, short -barreled shotgun, or shotgun as
those terms are defined in RCW 9.41.010. "Firearm" does not
include a flare gun or other pyrotechnic visual distress signaling
device, or a powder -actuated tool or other device designed solely
to be used for construction purposes.
C. "Lawfully authorized user" means any person who:
1. Is not in the unlawful possession of a firearm under
RCW 9.41.040; and
2. Is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under any
other state or federal law; and
3. Has the express permission of the owner to possess and
use the firearm.
D. "Locking device" includes any device listed on the
Approved Firearms Safety Devices Compatibility Chart, published
by the State of California's Office of the Attorney General and
attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A, which is incorporated
herein by this reference as if set forth in full, and stored in
conjunction with a compatible firearm. eable 10GIE, baffel leek,
speeifieatnens Chief of Police by Fule
E. "Minor" means a person under 18 years of age who is not
authorized under RCW 9.41.042 to possess a firearm, or a person
of at least 18 but less than 21 years of age who does not meet the
requirements of RCW 9.41.240.
F. "Prohibited person" means any person who is not a
lawfully authorized user.
Packet Pg. 346
9.8.c
Section 2. Subsection 5.24.070 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled, "Reporting theft or
loss of firearm required," is hereby amended to read as follows (deleted text is shown in
strikethrough; new text is shown in underline):
5.24.070 Reporting theft or loss of firearm required
A. If a firearm is lost or stolen, the person who owned or was in
possession of the firearm shall report the theft or loss to the
Edmonds police department if the loss or theft occurred in
Edmonds. The report shall be made within 24 hours after the theft
or loss is first discovered, and shall include to the extent known:
1. The firearm's caliber, make, model, manufacturer, and
serial number;
2. Any other distinguishing number or identification mark
on the firearm; and
3. The circumstances of the loss or theft, including the date,
place, and manner.
B. On receipt of a report of a stolen or lost firearm under this
section, the Edmonds police department shall enter into the
National Crime Information Center Database the following
information, to the extent known:
1. The firearm's caliber, make, model, manufacturer, and
serial number; and
2. Any other distinguishing number or identification mark
on the firearm.
C. Any violation of or failure to comply with the provisions of this
section shall constitute a civil infraction and shall be punished by a
fine not to exceed $1,000.
D. If a lost or stolen firearm is used by a third party to injure or kill
another:
1. The failure to comply with subsection (A) of this section
is prima facie evidence of negligence; but
2. The proper use of measures to safely store or keep a
firearm, including securing it with a locking device,
appmved byor- meeting . eeifirm+:o.- s established _by the
Packet Pg. 347
9.8.c
ehiefofp lice by ,.tiro promulgated : ar-dance with
Ch «e, s 26 ECCas defined in ECC 5.26.010.D, properly
engaged so as to render such weapon inaccessible or
unusable to any person other than the owner or other
lawfully authorized user, is an affirmative defense to a
claim of negligence. For purposes of this subsection,
"lawfully authorized user" means any person who:
a. Is not in the unlawful possession of a firearm under
RCW 9.41.040;
b. Is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under any
other state or federal law; and
c. Has the express permission of the owner to possess and
use the firearm.
Section 3. Non -enforcement period of Ordinance 4120 and 4121. Ordinances 4120 and
4121 shall not be enforced until 240 days after final passage, which is March 21, 2019.
Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and
severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of
this ordinance, or the invalidity of its application to any person or circumstance, does not affect
the validity of the remainder of this ordinance or the validity of its application to other persons or
circumstances.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect
thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance.
' ' W011QI
R DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTH TICATED:
CITY CLERK, SC ASSEY
Packet Pg. 348
9.8.c
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: October 19, 2018
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: October 23, 2018
PUBLISHED: October 28, 2018
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 2018
ORDINANCE NO. 4131
Packet Pg. 349
9.8.c
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4131
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 23`d day of October, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No.
4131. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF
AND ACCESS TO FIREARMS, RELATING TO THE
REPORTING OF LOST OR STOLEN FIREARMS, AMENDING
ORDINANCES 4120 AND 4121, AND DEFINING "LOCKING
DEVICE" BY INCORPORATING A LIST OF APPROVED
DEVICES
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 241h day of October, 2018. 4�;;
CIT ERK, SC • AS SEY
Packet Pg. 350
9.8.c
Approved Firearms Safety Devices Compability Chart
The firearms safety devices on this chart must be used in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. Aftermarket modifications, such as new grips
or sights, may affect the fit and functionality of a firearms safety device. Please ensure that the firearm safety device fits appropriately.
All firearms should be stored unloaded and locked using an approved firearms safety device.
There are currently 1586 devices in the database.
The following two tables list: 1) firearms safety devices that are currently approved by the DOJ and available for retail
sale; and 2) The following two tables list: 1) firearms safety devices that are currently approved by the DOJ and available
for retail sale; and 2) Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) devices that are provided to firearm manufacturers and
generally included with new firearms. Each table indicates the device type and name, and firearm types for which the
device is suitable:
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
DEVICES THAT ARE SOLD AT RETAIL
Bartell Lock
Zore Life Shaping Solutions Zore-X Core Gun Lock
Cabinet
Barska AX12752
r
>F
x
9
Cabinet
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3655
_
Cabinet
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30120080
_
Cabinet
Rhino Ironworks SC552112
>F
Cabinet
Rhino Ironworks SC552116
Cabinet
Safewell Group Holdings GC10-14
e
_
Cabinet
Safewell Group Holdings GC14-20
_
Cabinet
Safewell Group Holdings GC18-24
_
Cabinet
Safewell Group Holdings GC24-30
_
Cabinet
Sentinel GSXSG-24E
Cabinet
Stack -On Cabelas-14
Cabinet
Stack -On Cabelas-1413
Cabinet
Stack -On Cabela's- 1 8-MB-B
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 1 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:48 AM
Packet Pg. 351
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Cabinet
Stack -On FGCM-14
x
Cabinet
Stack -On FGCM-16
Cabinet
Stack -On GC-14P
Cabinet
Stack -On GC- 18C
e
Cabinet
Stack -On GC-8RTA
x
Cabinet
Stack -On GC-910-5
Cabinet
Stack -On GC-912
Cabinet
Stack -On GCAB-10-CP
Cabinet
Stack -On GCAB-8RTA
Cabinet
Stack -On GCAG-10-CP
Cabinet
Stack -On GCAG-8RTA
e
e
Cabinet
Stack -On GCB-14P
Cabinet
Stack -On GCB-1522
r
r
x
Cabinet
Stack -On GCB-17
Cabinet
Stack -On GCB- I8-C
Cabinet
Stack -On GCD-9216-5
Cabinet
Stack -On GCD-924
Cabinet
Stack -On GCDG-9216
e
Cabinet
Stack -On GCG-8RTA
Cabinet
Stack -On GCG-910
Cabinet
Stack -On GCM-17
e
Cabinet
Stack -On GCM-1914
Cabinet
Stack -On GCM-9216
Cabinet
Stack -On GCPO-12
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 2 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 352
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Cabinet
Stack -On GCSENB-8RTA
x
Cabinet
Stack -On GS-810
Cabinet
Stack -On H-16-DS
Cabinet
Stack -On HEH00205
Cabinet
Stack -On HEH00229
x
Cabinet
Stack -On IWC-I I
Cabinet
Stack -On IWC-22
Cabinet
Stack -On IWC-55
Cabinet
V-Line Industries 51653-S
Cable Lock
Adstar Inc. AB105
k
Cable Lock
Adstar Inc. AB106B
Cable Lock
AIM Sports Inc. CGLO1
_
Cable Lock
AIM Sports hic. CGLO1 S
_
Cable Lock
Allen Company 15413
Cable Lock
Allen Company 15414
Cable Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 110149 (green)
_
Cable Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 110149 (red)
_
Cable Lock
Birotech, Inc. CLC (Cable Lock Complete)
Cable Lock
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD8011
Cable Lock
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD8013
_
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies 38289
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL551
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL551B
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL551S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 3 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 353
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL558
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1070BKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
CL107ORKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1095BKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
CL1095RKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
x
CL1145BKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
CL1145RKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1250BKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
CL125ORKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1335BKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1335RKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
CL156ORKA
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
CL1725BCB
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
_
CL1725RCB
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1850BKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL185ORKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1996RCB
Cable Lock
Guarantee Lock Co Gun Loc 1000PTR-2-13
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 4 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 354
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
Guarantee Lock Co Gun Loc IOOOPTR-4-13
x
Cable Lock
GunMaster 38289
Cable Lock
Leapers Inc. TL-GLKO1
Cable Lock
Leapers Inc. TL-GLK02
Cable Lock
Leapers Inc. TL-GLK03
Cable Lock
Leapers Inc. TL-GLK04
Cable Lock
Master Lock 107
k
Cable Lock
Master Lock 108
Cable Lock
NAD Corporation CGL-13
Cable Lock
NAD Corporation CGL-15
Cable Lock
NAD Corporation CGL-15-K
Cable Lock
NAD Corporation CGL-60
Cable Lock
NAD Corporation CGL-8
Cable Lock
Premium Tactical Supply PTS Gun Cable Lock
_
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL 705
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL 790
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL710
k
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL7IOa
e
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL710-NSSF
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL-750
>r
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL750a
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL770 Longarm
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL777
Cable Lock
Pro-Lok GL850S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 5 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 355
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCSC-5DTAC-C14
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R12SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R13SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R14CBS3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R14SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15LC4
_
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15SC3-01
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15SC4
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15TC3
_
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R38LALC3
_ k
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R38LASC3
_ >F
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R38LASC3-NC
_
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R38LATC3
_
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R60LC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R60SC3
_
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RSE11SO
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RSE15SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RSE7SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RX15SC
_
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RXTI ISO
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RXT15SO
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RXT7SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales SL14-4PTAC (Rev. A)
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales SL14-4PTACB
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 6 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 356
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
Remington 18364
Cable Lock
Royal Case Company 28099-Red
_
Cable Lock
Royal Case Company 33505-Red
9;
_
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-14
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-18.5
x
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GA13-20
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-21
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-22
x
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-23
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GA13-24
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-25
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-26
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GA13-27
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-28
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-30
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GAB-32
Cable Lock
Secure Arms 12GA13-34
Cable Lock
Shanghai ITPC QS0130-15
_
Cable Lock
Shot Lock Corp. 10000PTR-2
Cable Lock
Shot Lock Corp. 10000-PTR-4
Cable Lock
Shot Lock Corp. 10000-PTR-4-SD
Cable Lock
SnapSafe 75280 - SnapSafe Cable Padlock
_
Cable Lock
Tactical Performance FSTFSA1011
Cable Lock
The Sports Products SP00224
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 7 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 357
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
Tippmann Arms Co. AF01370
x
_
Cable Lock
Uni-Hardware Ltd 30mm
Cable Lock
Uni-Hardware Ltd LPV/500
Cable Lock
Wan Cai Co., Ltd. WCCL171018
Cable Lock
Winchester 363035
x
Cable Lock
Winner International UTL 883
Cable Lock
Winner International UTL 883 KA
Cable Lock
Winner International UTL-881
Cable Lock
Winner International UTL-881 The Club
Chamber Lock
Gun Vault Inc. AR-01 MagVault AR/Carbine
Electronic Saf
Sport Lock 00064
External
Apollo EDM The Piece Keeper
_
External/Wrist
Armatix iW 1 - Intelligent Watch
Gun Cabinet
Chicago American Mfg. CAI
_
Gun Cabinet
Chicago American Mfg. CA5
_
Gun Cabinet
Chicago American Mfg. CA8
_
Gun Cabinet
H.S. Cabinets HS12
Gun Cabinet
H.S. Cabinets HS5
Gun Cabinet
H.S. Cabinets HS8
Gun Cabinet
Sentry Safe G2215
_
Gun Cabinet
Sentry Safe G7311
_
Integral
Omega Safety Systems SU 016 101, 16 gauge
over/under
Integral
Springfield Armory U.S. (Integral Locking System)
Internal
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. AR-15 Mag Well Lock
w/Wall Mount
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 8 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 358
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Internal
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. Lockdown
Internal
Omega Safety Systems RF 457, 101, .45-70 Govt.
Internal
Omega Safety Systems SU 012 101, 12 Gauge
Over/Under
Internal
Omega Safety Systems SU 012 IOTA, 12 Gauge
Over/Under
Internal
Omega Safety Systems SU 020 101, 20 Gauge
Over/Under
Internal
Omega Safety Systems SU 028 101, 28 Gauge
Over/Under
Internal
Omega Safety Systems SU 410 101, .410 Gauge
Over/Under
Internal
Your Gunlock YGL-038 (Lock)/THYG-18-400(Key)
Lock Box
9G Products Inc. INPRINT
Lock Box
ADG Sports 33003 Standard Security Vault
Lock Box
ADG Sports 33013 Deluxe Secure Vault
Lock Box
ADG Sports 33018
Lock Box
ADG Sports Select Biometric
Lock Box
Advanced Security Products Mini Vault Deluxe GV-
1000C
Lock Box
Advanced Security Products Mini Vault GV-1000C
Lock Box
Advanced Security Products Multi Vault Deluxe GV-
2000C
Lock Box
Advanced Security Products Multi Vault GV-2000C
Lock Box
AEGIS Industries AMPLB-11TL
Lock Box
AEGIS Industries AMPLB-18
Lock Box
AEGIS Industries APLB-10
Lock Box
AEGIS Industries APLB-13
Lock Box
AEGIS Industries APLB-8
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 9 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 359
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
American Security Products HAS410
Lock Box
American Security Products PB 1
Lock Box
American Security Products PB2
Lock Box
American Security Products PB48
Lock Box
American Security Products PS1210EZ
Lock Box
American Security Products PS1210HD
Lock Box
American Security Products SWPB1
Lock Box
American Security Products SWPB2
Lock Box
American Security Products SWW1014
Lock Box
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 9006ES
Lock Box
Barska AX11224
Lock Box
Barska AX11620
Lock Box
Barska AX12038
Lock Box
Barska AX12400
Lock Box
Barska AX12404
Lock Box
Barska AX12840
Lock Box
Barska AX13092
Lock Box
Barska AX13094
Lock Box
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 1082263
Lock Box
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 1082264
Lock Box
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 1082265
Lock Box
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 222820
Lock Box
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 222905
Lock Box
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 222933
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 10 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 360
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Beretta Quick Defense Pistol Vault LB1000
Lock Box
Boyt Harness Co. 83003
Lock Box
Boyt Harness Co. 83005
Lock Box
Boyt Harness Co. 83006
Lock Box
Boyt Harness Co. Select Series/83001
Lock Box
Boyt Harness Co. Select Series/83002
Lock Box
Boyt Harness Co. Speed Series/83004
Lock Box
BRK Brands 520ODF
Lock Box
BRK Brands 540ODF
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD1050
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD1060
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD1070
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD2000
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD3000
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4000
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4010
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4020
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4030
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4030B
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4040
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4040B
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4055
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4055B
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4060
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 11 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 361
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD4065B
Lock Box
Cannon Safe QS-01
Lock Box
Cannon Safe QS-01
Lock Box
Cannon Safe VV500
Lock Box
Cannon Safe WS-00-C
x
x
Lock Box
Cannon Safe WS-60
Lock Box
Caron Products 6182 RAD2
k
Lock Box
Caron Products 6184 RAD4
_
Lock Box
DAC Technologies ATV-2003C
Lock Box
DAC Technologies CS35E
Lock Box
DAC Technologies S2500E
Lock Box
DAC Technologies S25EBK
Lock Box
DAC Technologies S25EWH
Lock Box
Doskocil Manufacturing Gun Guard Deluxe Double
Pistol Safe
Lock Box
Doskocil Manufacturing Gun Guard Deluxe Pistol Safe
Lock Box
Doskocil Manufacturing Gun Guard DLX Double
Security Safe
Lock Box
Doskocil Manufacturing Gun Guard DLX Single
Security Safe
Lock Box
Doskocil Manufacturing Gun Guard SE Security Safe
Lock Box
Doskocil Manufacturing Gun Guard XLT Security Safe
Lock Box
Energy Technology Laboratories 20700 Wall Vault-
Biometric Unit
Lock Box
Energy Technology Laboratories 20710 Wall Vault-
Key Pad Unit
Lock Box
Fireann Safety Device Corporation (FSDC) MLC9000
Lock Box
FireKing Security Group Laptop Safe
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 12 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 362
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
FireKing Security Group Personal Safe
Lock Box
Fort Knox Security Products Fort Knox Pistol Box -
FKPB
Lock Box
Fortress B-P2EA Quick Access Pistol Safe
Lock Box
Fortress P2EA-Quick Access Pistol Safe
Lock Box
Fortress P2EAR
Lock Box
Granite Security Products, Inc. ET-180
Lock Box
Granite Security Products, Inc. eV-1200
Lock Box
Granite Security Products, Inc. eV-400
Lock Box
Granite Security Products, Inc. eV-600
Lock Box
GSM Products ELB 1
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. AR 1000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. ARB1000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GV-1000, Mini -Vault
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GV-1000D, Mini -Vault Deluxe
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GV-2000, Multi -Vault
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GV-2000D, Multi -Vault Deluxe
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GV3000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GV5926F
_
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GVB 1000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GVB2000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. GVB3000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. HV3000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. MV 1000
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. MV 500
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 13 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 363
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. MVB 1000
x
x
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. MVB 500
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. SV500
9;
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. SVB500
Lock Box
GunVault EXV 1000
x
Lock Box
Heritage Security Products, Inc. P3EAR
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 36010
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 36017KD
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 36028
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3605
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3607
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3630
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3632
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3638
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3660
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 36614
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 36685
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 36688
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. 3690
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HSI0036683
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HSI0036684
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS10036685
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS20036614
*
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS20136614
_
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 14 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 364
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30003605
x
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30003630
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30003630
9;
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30003660
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30036010
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30036028
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30103605
*
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30103630
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30103630
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30103660
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30120100
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30120140
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30136010
_
Lock Box
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS30136028
_
Lock Box
Honeywell 5101DOJ
Lock Box
Honeywell 5112
Lock Box
Honeywell 5112DOJ
Lock Box
Honeywell 5301DOJ
Lock Box
Hornady 95430 - Keypad Vault
Lock Box
Hornady 95432 - Two -Gun Keypad Vault
Lock Box
Hornady 98110 - Biometric Safe 2700
Lock Box
Hornady 98141 - RAPiD Safe 4800KP
Lock Box
Hornady 98150 - RAND Safe
Lock Box
Hornady 98151 - Armlock Lock Box
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 15 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 365
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Homady 98152 - Tripoint Lock Box
Lock Box
Homady 98152 - Tripoint Lock Box
Lock Box
Homady 98153 - Alpha Elite Lock Box
Lock Box
Homady 98170 - RAPiD Safe 2700
Lock Box
Homady 98171 - Key Lock Safe 270OKL
Lock Box
Homady 98172 - RAPiD Safe 270OKP
Lock Box
Homady 98175 - RAPiD Safe 2600
Lock Box
Homady 98176 - Key Lock Safe 260OKL
Lock Box
Homady 98177 - RAND Safe 260OKP
Lock Box
Homady 98210-RAPiD Vehicle Safe
Lock Box
Industrial Lock and Hardware WMS
Lock Box
Innovative Procurement 20EI
Lock Box
Innovative Procurement P2EA-B
Lock Box
Innovative Procurement S-STPS-Summit Trails
Personal Safe
Lock Box
Isteki Electronics Inc BG-12-002
Lock Box
Legacy Sports International BRSB23EFGRN - Buffalo
River
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HD-100
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HD-200
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HD-300
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HD-50
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HD-90
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HDX-150
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HDX-250
Lock Box
Liberty Safe HDX-350
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 16 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 366
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Lock SAF PBS-001
x
x
Lock Box
Master Lock MLQAP2BE
Lock Box
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. 25NEK
Lock Box
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. SW-
SCOT (B077K3FJHC)
Lock Box
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. SW-
SCO2 (B077KlYH8Z)
Lock Box
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. SW-
SC03 (B077K2QNVD)
Lock Box
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. SW-
SKOI (B077JSL9FQ)
Lock Box
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. SW-
SK02 (B077JSL9FS)
Lock Box
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. SW-
SK03 (B077JSNGlV)
Lock Box
Pro-Lok GLSF-08
Lock Box
Pro-Lok GLSF-10
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PPV
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-1000
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-1000-B
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-1500
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-1500-B
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-500
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-500-B
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-900
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV-900-B
Lock Box
Rhino Ironworks PSIW 1014
Lock Box
Rhino Ironworks PSIW 1818
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 17 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 367
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Rhino Metals, Inc. LSB 1818
x
_
Lock Box
Ridgeline Safe & Vault PV-50
Lock Box
Safari Safe Co. SQS-01
Lock Box
Safari Safe Co. SWS-00-C
Lock Box
Safari Safe Co. SWS-60
x
Lock Box
Safewell Group Holdings PS14VA
Lock Box
Safewell Group Holdings PS15VB
Lock Box
Safewell Group Holdings PS56B
Lock Box
Sentinel GCW-1
Lock Box
Sentinel GCW-12
Lock Box
Sentinel GCW-8
Lock Box
Sentinel GCWB-1
Lock Box
Sentinel GCWB-10-5
Lock Box
Sentinel GCWB-14
Lock Box
Sentinel GCWB-14-5
Lock Box
Sentinel GCWB-8
Lock Box
Sentinel GCWD-10
Lock Box
Sentinel PBW-1
Lock Box
Sentinel PBWB - 2
Lock Box
Sentinel PBWB-2
Lock Box
Sentry Safe E5251-T
_
Lock Box
Sentry Safe G0135
Lock Box
Sentry Safe G1410
*
_
Lock Box
Sentry Safe G4311
>r
_
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 18 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 368
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Sentry Safe G5241
x
_
Lock Box
Sentry Safe G5245
_
Lock Box
Sentry Safe G6211
Lock Box
Sentry Safe P100
Lock Box
Sentry Safe QAPIBE
Lock Box
Sentry Safe QAP2BEL
Lock Box
Sentry Safe QAP2E - XL Quick Access Pistol Safe
Lock Box
Sentry Safe QAP2EL - XL Quick Access Pistol Safe
Lock Box
Sentry Safe Quick Access Pistol
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X031
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X031A
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X041E
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X041E
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X055
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X055
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X055A
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X075
Lock Box
Sentry Safe X105P
Lock Box
Sequiam Biometrics BioVault 2.0
Lock Box
ShotLock Handgun Solo Vault 200E
Lock Box
ShotLock Handgun Solo -Vault 200M
Lock Box
ShotLock Shotgun Solo Vault 200E
Lock Box
ShotLock Shotgun Solo -Vault 200M
Lock Box
Sleep Safe Co. Sleep Safe
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 19 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 369
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Sleep Safe Company NSC 09
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75200 - SnapSafe Key Lock Box L
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75210 - SnapSafe Key Lock Box XL
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75220 - SnapSafe Key Lock Box XXL
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75230 - SnapSafe Combo Lock Box L
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75240 - SnapSafe Combo Lock Box XL
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75250 - SnapSafe Combo Lock Box XXL
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75430 - Two Gun Keypad Vault
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75431 - Drop Box Keypad Vault
Lock Box
SnapSafe 75432 - Keypad Vault
Lock Box
Sport Lock 00061
Lock Box
Sport Lock 00063
Lock Box
Sport Lock 00071
Lock Box
Sport Lock 00072
Lock Box
Sports Afield SA -RV 1
Lock Box
Sports Afield SA-RV2
Lock Box
Sports Afield SA-RV3
Lock Box
Sports Afield SA-RVS
Lock Box
Stack -On E-029-MB-E
Lock Box
Stack -On ES-403
Lock Box
Stack -On ES-604
e
e
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-900
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-900-5
9
9
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-908
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 20 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 370
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-908-5
x
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-908-A
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-914
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-914-5
e
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-916
x
Lock Box
Stack -On GCAB-500-CP
Lock Box
Stack -On GCAG-500
Lock Box
Stack -On GCAG-500-CP
Lock Box
Stack -On GCB-500
Lock Box
Stack -On GCB-5300-RTA
Lock Box
Stack -On GCB-8RTA
Lock Box
Stack -On GCB-900
Lock Box
Stack -On GCB-908
Lock Box
Stack -On GCB-910
Lock Box
Stack -On GCB-914
Lock Box
Stack -On GCD-920
Lock Box
Stack -On GCD-9216
Lock Box
Stack -On GCD-924-5
Lock Box
Stack -On GCDB-924
Lock Box
Stack -On GCG-500
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-10
e
e
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-12
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-16BLK
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-16EL
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 21 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 371
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-300
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-316
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-410
9;
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-412
e
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-416
x
Lock Box
Stack -On GS-8
Lock Box
Stack -On GSBLK-I6-CB
Lock Box
Stack -On GSD-323
Lock Box
Stack -On GSD-419
Lock Box
Stack -On GSD-423
Lock Box
Stack -On GSD-819
e
e
Lock Box
Stack -On GSX-514
Lock Box
Stack -On GSX-520
Lock Box
Stack -On GSX-5714
Lock Box
Stack -On GSX-814
Lock Box
Stack -On GSX-820
Lock Box
Stack -On GSX-8714
Lock Box
Stack -On H-11-BP-E
Lock Box
Stack -On H-20-BP-E
Lock Box
Stack -On H-5-BP-E
9c
Lock Box
Stack -On H-8-BP-E
Lock Box
Stack -On PB-101
Lock Box
Stack -On PB-201
Lock Box
Stack -On PB-201B
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 22 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 372
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Stack -On PBWB-2
x
x
Lock Box
Stack -On PC-2HG-MB-RFiD
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-1500
9;
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-1500-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-1505
x
x
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-1800-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-1800-E
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-1805E
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-300
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-305
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-500
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-500-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-505
Lock Box
Stack -On PDS-505-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PFS-1608
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-10-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-10-B-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1415-RTX
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-15-05
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1508
Lock Box
Stack -On PS- 15-10-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1514
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1515
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1520
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 23 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 373
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-15-20-B
x
x
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-15-5-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1805-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS- 1805-E
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1808-E
x
x
Lock Box
Stack -On PS- 1810-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS- 1814-E
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1815-E
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1820-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-1820-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-20-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-20-B-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-312
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-314
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-315
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-320
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-508
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-508-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-512
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-514
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-514-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-515
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-515-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-520
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 24 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 374
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-520-12
x
x
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-5-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-5-B-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-7-B
Lock Box
Stack -On PS-7-B-12
x
x
Lock Box
Stack -On PSE-507
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-709 Mechanical
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-717 Mechanical
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-722
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-726
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-809 Electronic
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-809-K
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-817 Electronic
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-817-K
Lock Box
Stack -On PSFE-826
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-RH-17
Lock Box
Stack -On PWS-1522-12
Lock Box
Stack -On PWS-15522
Lock Box
Stack -On PWS-1555
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1200
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1200B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1300
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1304
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1304-12
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 25 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 375
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1310
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1330
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1510
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1510-B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1512
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1512-B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1514
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1514-B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1530
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1545
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1545-B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1810-E
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1812-B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1845-B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-1845-E
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-450
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-450B
Lock Box
Stack -On QAS-710
Lock Box
Stack -On SHD-I-MB-PB
Lock Box
Stack -On SHD-AOTT-MB-B
Lock Box
Stack -On SHD-AOTT-MB-E
Lock Box
Stack -On WIN-201
Lock Box
Stanley STFPQA190
Lock Box
Stealth STL-HHS
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 26 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 376
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
The Gun Box The GunBox Biometric
x
x
Lock Box
Titan Security Products Inc. Titan Compact Pistol Vault
AS-2020-01
Lock Box
Titan Security Products Inc. Titan Gun Safe/Vault AS-
2020-02
Lock Box
Titan Security Products Inc. Titan Gun Vault AS-2020-
02
Lock Box
TruckVault TruckVault Standard Height 2-Drawer
_
Lock Box
TruckVault TV Magnum Height 1-Drawer
_
Lock Box
TruckVault TV Magnum Height 2-Drawer
Lock Box
TruckVault TV Standard Height 1-Drawer
_
Lock Box
TruckVault TV Std. Height 1-Drawer for Sedans
_
Lock Box
TruckVault TV Std. Height 2-Drawer for Sedans
_
Lock Box
TruckVault TV Std. Hgt. 1-Drawer for Comm. Ctr.
_
Lock Box
Union Safe Company Electronic Handgun Safe 62984
Lock Box
Union Safe Company Fast Dropdown Handgun Safe -
64022
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. Pro Mxi
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. Pro VT
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. Pro Vti
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. SL20i
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. VR10
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. VT10i (Pink)
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. VT20 (Black)
Lock Box
Vaultek Safe, Inc. VT20i (Black)
Lock Box
Verifi S4000
Lock Box
Verifi S5000
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 27 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 377
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Lock Box
Verifi S6000
x
x
Lock Box
V-Line Industries 10123-S-FBLK
Lock Box
V-Line Industries 279-S
9;
Lock Box
V-Line Industries Brute 1394-5 FBLK
Lock Box
V-Line Industries Desk Mate 2597-S
x
Lock Box
V-Line Industries Hide -Away 3912-SH
Lock Box
V-Line Industries Quick Vault 41214-5
Lock Box
V-Line Industries Top Draw 2912-5
Lock Box
Winchester D-TP-HS-9
Lock Box
Winchester eVault Biometric 3.0
Lock Box
Winchester Safes D-KL-HS-9 DEFENDER Keylock
Safe
Lock Box
Winchester Safes D-RF-HS-9 DEFENDER RFiD Safe
Lock Box
Winchester WIN-500
Magazine Blo
Franzen AR 15 Firearm Lock
Other/Extemal
Advanced Security Products GV3000C
Other/Extemal
DAC Technologies CCM003C
Other/External
DAC Technologies SGL 1100
Other/External
Hornady 98180 - RAPiD Shotgun Wall Lock
Other/Extemal
Homady 98185 - RAPiD AR Wall Lock
Other/External
Mogul Company LLC LJl Life -Jacket
Other/Extemal
Mogul Company LLC LJ2 Life -Jacket
Other/External
Mogul Company LLC LJ3 Life -Jacket
Other/Extemal
Pro-Lok GL675-B 1- Lever Action (Brown)
Other/External
Pro-Lok GL675-B2 Lever Action (Green)
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 28 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 378
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Other/External
Pro-Lok GL675-B3 Lever Action (Black)
Other/External
Sooner Gun Safety GL150
Other/External
TmckVault ShotLock Mini Vault
Other/External
TmckVault ShotLock Solo Vault
Other/External
US RAC The RAC
x
Other/External
VisuaLock Model H, Size B
Other/Extemal
VisuaLock Model H, Size C
Other/External
VisuaLock Model H, Size D
Other/External
VisuaLock Model H, Size E
Other/Intemal
All Steel Firearms Kidsafe Gunlock
9c
k
Other/Internal
Armatix Quick Lock .308 Win
Other/Internal
Armatix Quick Lock .45 ACP
Other/Internal
Armatix Quick Lock, Kaliber 12
Other/Intemal
CeaseFire BR12A
Other/Internal
GSI International GSI 1911/45
Other/Internal
gunBlocker gunBlocker
Other/Intemal
GunLock Inc. LG-308-2200-01
Other/Internal
Gunlock Inc. PI-9mm-0500-01
Other/Internal
Gunlock Inc. RV-357-0400-02
Other/Intemal
Life Save-R Gun Lock Inc. IB-SA-45-2401
Other/Intemal
Northeast Design 01-700
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com 357 Sig -A
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com 380-ACP-A
Other/Intemal
Omegagunlock.com 40 S&W-A
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 29 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 379
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com 45 ACP-A
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com 9mm-A
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com A-10mm
_
Other/Intemal
Omegagunlock.com A-22LR
_
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com A-25 ACP
_
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com A-32 ACP
_
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com R-30-.30
_
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com R-.30-06/.25-06/.270
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com R-.45-.70
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com R-223 Rem.
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com R-308
Other/Internal
Omegagunlock.com R-7mm Mag./.300 Win. Mag.
Other/Intemal
Phoenix Arms PAL 2
Other/Intemal
Precision Tactical PT -AR LOK
k
Other/Internal
VisuaLock 40SW/5
Other/Internal
VisuaLock Model H, Size A
Other/Internal
VisuaLock R-22/5
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 5025-2.5"
Shackle 50mm body
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 9010 1.5"
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 9011 2.5"
Padlock
DAC Technologies PLL425
Padlock
DAC Technologies SL035
Padlock
DAC Technologies SL060
Padlock
DAC Technologies SPK025
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 30 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 380
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Padlock
DAC Technologies SPK060
Padlock
Guarantee Lock Co Gun Loc SHLD-150
Padlock
Master Lock 111LF
k
Padlock
Master Lock 111LFNV
Padlock
Master Lock 111LJ
x
Padlock
Master Lock 111LK
Padlock
Master Lock 111LN
k
Padlock
Mogul Company LLC LJ5
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales SL40-5PT1
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales SL40-5PT5
Padlock
Ruger 5015NV
Padlock/Clam
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC) LL675RKD
Safe
ADG Sports Select Medium
Safe
ADG Sports Select Personal
Safe
American Security Products TF5517
_
Safe
American Security Products TF5924
_
Safe
Barska AX11652
Safe
Barska AX11780
_
Safe
Barska AX11898
_
Safe
Barska AX12216 FV-1000
Safe
Barska AX 12218 FV-2000
Safe
Barska AX12220 FV-3000
Safe
Barska AX12760
*
_
Safe
Barska AX13100
_
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 31 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 381
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Bighorn UABI9ES
x
_
Safe
BRK Brands 2730 DFC
_
Safe
BRK Brands 2743 DF
Safe
BRK Brands 6720F
_
Safe
BRK Brands 6740F
_
Safe
BRK Brands 6742 DF
_
Safe
Burg Wachter USA Ranger R S1/7 Version E
_
Safe
Cannon Safe 551816-30-HITEC
Safe
Cannon Safe 5518-A
Safe
Cannon Safe 5518-B
Safe
Cannon Safe 5521 DLX
_
Safe
Cannon Safe 5521F-A
Safe
Cannon Safe 5521F-B
Safe
Cannon Safe 5526F-A
Safe
Cannon Safe 5526F-B
Safe
Cannon Safe 5526F-C
Safe
Cannon Safe 5526F-D
Safe
Cannon Safe 553620-30-HITEC
Safe
Cannon Safe 5540E-A
Safe
Cannon Safe 5540E-B
Safe
Cannon Safe 5540E-C
Safe
Cannon Safe 5540E-D
Safe
Cannon Safe 5540E-E
Safe
Cannon Safe 5540E-F
>r
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 32 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 382
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Cannon Safe 5926-DOK
x
Safe
Cannon Safe 5926F-A
Safe
Cannon Safe 5926F-B
Safe
Cannon Safe 5926F-C
Safe
Cannon Safe 5926F-D
x
Safe
Cannon Safe 5932F-C
Safe
Cannon Safe 5940
Safe
Cannon Safe 5940E-A
Safe
Cannon Safe 5940E-B
Safe
Cannon Safe 5940E-C
Safe
Cannon Safe 5940E-D
Safe
Cannon Safe 602618-30-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe 603020-30-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe 604024-30-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe 604830-30-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe AS5932
_
Safe
Cannon Safe CP482014-30-HlHEC
Safe
Cannon Safe CP594024-30-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe CS32S
_
Safe
Cannon Safe CS4820
_
Safe
Cannon Safe CS6026AR-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe CS6036AR-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe CS6036-HlTEC
Safe
Cannon Safe CS72-60-H12FEC
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 33 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 383
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Cannon Safe FR593020-30-1-112TEC
x
Safe
Cannon Safe HD14F-AR
Safe
Cannon Safe HD48
9;
Safe
Cannon Safe M5929
Safe
Cannon Safe S5521E
x
x
Safe
Cannon Safe S5521EF
_
Safe
Cannon Safe S5521M
Safe
Cannon Safe S5521MF
Safe
Cannon Safe SH4818-30-HIHEC
Safe
Cannon Safe SH5948-45-HIFEC
Safe
Cannon Safe TS5926-AR
Safe
Cannon Safe TS5934-45
Safe
Cannon Safe TS5940-60
Safe
Cannon Safe TS5940-75
Safe
Cannon Safe TS5950-75
Safe
Cannon Safe USA42-HITEC
Safe
Cannon Safe VF24AR-HlTEC
Safe
Cannon Safe VF24-H1TEC
Safe
Cannon Safe VF42AR-HlTEC
Safe
Cannon Safe VF42-HITEC
9c
Safe
Cannon Safe WS21
_
Safe
Cannon Safe WS-24-DOK
Safe
Fortress Safe Fortress FS 14E
*
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. Bandit 9 (Winchester)
_
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 34 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 384
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. Deputy 10 (Winchester)
x
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. Deputy 14 (Winchester)
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. Legend 21 (Winchester)
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. S-592620 "Redhead"
>F
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. S-594027 'Redhead"
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. S-724027 'Redhead"
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. Tradition 15
_
(Winchester)
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. Tradition 19
_
(Winchester)
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. Tradition 30
>F
_
(Winchester)
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. TS-15-11
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. TS-22-BLK
_
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. TS-9-11-EFL
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. WW-592820
_
(Winchester)
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. GV5500
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. GV5900
>F
_
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. GV590OF
_
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. GVB5900
_
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. GVB590OF
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. GVB5926F
>F
_
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. TV4810
_
Safe
Gun Vault Inc. TVB4810
Safe
Heritage Security Products, Inc. HSI4ULE
_
Safe
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS40221120
_
RETAIL DEVICES Page 35 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 385
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS40231120
x
_
Safe
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS40231160
_
Safe
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS50121160
9;
_
Safe
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS50121240
_
Safe
Homak Manufacturing Inc. HS50123360
_
Safe
Homady 98190 - RAND Safe AR Gunlocker
_
Safe
Kodiak K13ES
Safe
Kodiak K19ES
Safe
Kodiak KB5520ECS
Safe
Kodiak KB5940
Safe
Kodiak UAKI9ES
Safe
Legacy Sports International Q4320 - Buffalo River
_
Safe
Legacy Sports International Q5320 - Buffalo River
_
Safe
Liberty Safe CAB-DK23-BKT-Chrome M Lock
_
(Cabella's)
Safe
Liberty Safe Cabelas Pro Vault 12 Gun
_
Safe
Liberty Safe Cabelas Pro Vault 18 Gun
Safe
Liberty Safe Cabelas Pro Vault 24 Gun
_
Safe
Liberty Safe CAB-PTI2-GTT
_
Safe
Liberty Safe CAB-PT24-GTT
Safe
Liberty Safe CAB-WD30-BKT-Chrome M Lock (8
_
bolt)
Safe
Liberty Safe Centurion 12
_
Safe
Liberty Safe Centurion 18
_
Safe
Liberty Safe Centurion 24
_
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 36 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 386
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Liberty Safe FRDM-ES64-GTT-Chrome D Lock
x
_
(Freedom Sec Fat Boy)
Safe
Liberty Safe FRDM-ID20-Chrome M Lock (Freedom
Security)
Safe
Liberty Safe FRDM-ID30-BKT-Chrome M Lock (5
_
bolt)
Safe
Liberty Safe FRDM-PS50-GTT-Chrome M Lock
_
(Freedom Security)
Safe
Liberty Safe GAND-GF25-GYM-Bchrome D Lock
_
Safe
Liberty Safe JD-PM35-BKG-Chrome D Lock (John
_
Deere)
Safe
Liberty Safe Liberty Revolution 12 Gun
_
Safe
Liberty Safe Liberty Revolution 18 Gun
_
Safe
Liberty Safe Liberty Revolution 24 Gun
_
Safe
Liberty Safe LIB-PX25-BLM- Chrome M Lock
_
Safe
Liberty Safe LIB-PX40-BLM-24 M Lock
_
Safe
Liberty Safe LIB-PX50-BLM-Brass D Lock
_
Safe
Liberty Safe LIB -RE I8-BKT
_
Safe
Liberty Safe LOWE-FJ48-BKT-Chrome M Lock
_
(Liberty Fat Boy Jr.)
Safe
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. 28EGPF
>F
_
Safe
Ningbo Safewell International Holding Corp. 64EBF
_
Safe
Pregex Industrial (Suzhou) Co. SFG-15036-E
_
Safe
Rhino Ironworks KBI9ECX
Safe
Rhino Ironworks KB5933ECX
Safe
Rhino Ironworks PSIW2418
Safe
Rhino Metals, Inc. K13ES
_
Safe
Rhino Metals, Inc. LSB1014
*
_
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 37 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 387
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Rhino Metals, Inc. LSB2418
x
_
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5518-A
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5518-B
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5521 DLX
e
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5521F-A
x
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5521F-B
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 552617-A
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 552617-13
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 552617-C
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5526F-D
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5540E-A
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5540E-B
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5540E-C
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5540E-D
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5540E-E
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5540E-F
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5926-DOK
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 592617-A
e
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 592617-13
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5926F-C
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 592617-1)
e
e
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5940
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5940E-A
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5940E-B
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 38 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 388
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Safari Safe Co. 5940E-C
x
Safe
Safari Safe Co. M5929
Safe
Safari Safe Co. S5521E
Safe
Safari Safe Co. S5521MF
e
Safe
Safari Safe Co. WS-24-DOK
x
Safe
Sentinel GCB-14F
Safe
Sentinel GCWB-14-P
Safe
Sentinel GSXSG-24E
Safe
Sentry Safe C1208
_
Safe
Sentry Safe C1212
_
Safe
Sentry Safe C1216
_
Safe
Sentry Safe E1459C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe EF3025E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe EF3428E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe EF4738E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe EM1055E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe EQ1459C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G1055C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G1055E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G1214
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G1455C
Safe
Sentry Safe G1455E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G1459C
*
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G1459DC
_
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 39 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 389
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Sentry Safe G1459E
x
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G1464C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G2215
9;
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G2459C
e
_
Safe
Sentry Safe G7311
x
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM1055E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM1255E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM1459C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM1459E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM1459ES
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM2459C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM2459E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM3659C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GM3659E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GS1459C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GS1459E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GS2459C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GS2459E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GS3659C
_
Safe
Sentry Safe GS5351
_
Safe
Sentry Safe HDCI1E
_
Safe
Sentry Safe HDCI IESGP
_
Safe
Sentry Safe PP1K
Safe
Sentry Safe T6-331
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 40 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 390
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Sentry Safe TW8-331
Safe
Sports Afield SA 5926
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA 5940
9;
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5516
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5520
x
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5520-SC
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5526 Basic
*
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5924P
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5925H
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5928
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5930H
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5932P
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5933
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA5942H
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA6028
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA6033
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA6040
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA6046
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA7240
_
Safe
Sports Afield SA-ESO1
Safe
Sports Afield SA-ES02
Safe
Sports Afield SA-ES03
Safe
Sports Afield SA-ES04
Safe
Stack -On A-18-MB-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 41 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:49 AM
Packet Pg. 391
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On A-24-MB-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On A-40-MB-B-S
Safe
Stack -On A-40-MB-B-S
Safe
Stack -On A-40-MB-E-S
e
Safe
Stack -On A-64-MB-E-S-72
x
Safe
Stack -On A-64-MB-E-S-72-C
Safe
Stack -On AGC-408
Safe
Stack -On BC-18-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On BC-24-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On BC-24-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On BC-40-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On Cabela's- 1 8B-DS
Safe
Stack -On E-029-SB-C
Safe
Stack -On E-029-SB-E
Safe
Stack -On E-040-SB-C
Safe
Stack -On E-040-SB-E
Safe
Stack -On E-059-SB-C
Safe
Stack -On E-059-SB-E
Safe
Stack -On E-13-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-16-NM-E
Safe
Stack -On E-16-MG-C
e
Safe
Stack -On E-22-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-24-NM-E
Safe
Stack -On E-24-MB-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 42 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 392
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On E-24-MG-C
x
Safe
Stack -On E-24-MG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On E-24-MG-E
Safe
Stack -On E-24-MG-E-S
e
Safe
Stack -On E-30-MB-B-S
x
Safe
Stack -On E-30-MB-B-S
Safe
Stack -On E-30-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-30-MG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On E-35-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-36-NM-E
Safe
Stack -On E-36-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-36-MG-C
Safe
Stack -On E-36-MG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On E-36-MG-E
Safe
Stack -On E-36-MG-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-40-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-40-MB-RFID-S
Safe
Stack -On E-40-MG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On E-48-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On E-48-MB-E-S
9c
Safe
Stack -On E-48-MG-C
e
Safe
Stack -On E-48-MG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On E-48-MG-E
Safe
Stack -On E-48-MG-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 43 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 393
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On E-4-MB-E-S
x
x
Safe
Stack -On E55-24-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-60-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-66-MB-E-S
e
Safe
Stack -On E-69-MB-B-S
x
Safe
Stack -On E-69-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-69-MG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On E-8-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-90-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On E-90-MB-E-S-72
Safe
Stack -On ES-2902-7
Safe
Stack -On ES-29-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On ES-36-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On ES-36-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On ES-403-7
Safe
Stack -On ES55-24-GP-E
Safe
Stack -On ES55-24-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On ES55-40-GP-E
Safe
Stack -On ES55-40-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On ES55-64-GP-E
Safe
Stack -On ES55-64-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On ES55-90-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On ES-604-7
Safe
Stack -On ES-803-7
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 44 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 394
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On ES-804-7
x
x
Safe
Stack -On ES-8902-7
Safe
Stack -On FS-14-MB-C
9;
Safe
Stack -On FS-14-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On FS-14-MG-C
x
x
Safe
Stack -On FS-18-MB-C
Safe
Stack -On FS-24-MB-C
Safe
Stack -On FS-24-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On FS-24-MB-E-DB
Safe
Stack -On FS-24-MG-C
Safe
Stack -On FS-36-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On FS-36-MG-C
Safe
Stack -On FS-8-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On FS-8-MG-C
Safe
Stack -On FSBC-40-MB-E-S-MEN
Safe
Stack -On FSS-10-MB-C
Safe
Stack -On FSS-10-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On FSS-I2-DGP-E
Safe
Stack -On FSS-I2-MB-C
Safe
Stack -On FSS-I4-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On FSS15-40-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On FSS15-64-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack-OnFSS15-64-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On FSS15-64-MB-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 45 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 395
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On FSS-I8-MB-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On FSS-I8-MGY-E
Safe
Stack -On FSS-24-MB-E-S
9;
Safe
Stack -On FSS-28-BP-E
e
Safe
Stack -On FSS-40-MB-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On FSS-48-MG-E-S
Safe
Stack -On FSS-64-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On FSS-64-MGY-E-S
Safe
Stack -On FSS-64-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On FSW-24-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On GCBRTA
e
e
Safe
Stack -On GCAG-10
Safe
Stack -On GCAG-14
Safe
Stack -On GCAG-I4-CP
Safe
Stack -On GCAG-8RTA
Safe
Stack -On GCB
Safe
Stack -On GCB-14F
Safe
Stack -On GCB-1716-CP
Safe
Stack -On GCB- 18-K
Safe
Stack -On GCBL-I4-LE
Safe
Stack -On GCBL-I8-LE
e
e
Safe
Stack -On GCBL-8-LE
Safe
Stack -On GCDBC-1631
Safe
Stack -On GCDG-924
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 46 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 396
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On GCG-14P
x
Safe
Stack -On GCG-900
Safe
Stack -On GCG-914
Safe
Stack -On GCWB-10
e
Safe
Stack -On GCWB-10-5
x
Safe
Stack -On GCWB-14P
Safe
Stack -On GCWB-18
Safe
Stack -On GCWB-5
Safe
Stack -On GS-208
Safe
Stack -On GS-212
Safe
Stack -On GS-310
Safe
Stack -On GS-312
Safe
Stack -On GS-816
Safe
Stack -On GSB-16
Safe
Stack -On GSB-16E
Safe
Stack -On GSB-710E
Safe
Stack -On GSB-719
Safe
Stack -On GSB-722-55
Safe
Stack -On GSG-16
Safe
Stack -On GSG-710
Safe
Stack -On GSG-716
e
e
Safe
Stack -On GSG-719
Safe
Stack -On GSG-722
Safe
Stack -On GSGX-514
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 47 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 397
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On GSGX-522
x
Safe
Stack -On GSGX-532
Safe
Stack -On GSGX-814
Safe
Stack -On GSGX-822
e
Safe
Stack -On GSGX-832
x
Safe
Stack -On GSX-12
Safe
Stack -On GSX-14
Safe
Stack -On GSX-414
Safe
Stack -On GSX-420
Safe
Stack -On GSX-516
Safe
Stack -On GSX-524
Safe
Stack -On GSX-524-55
Safe
Stack -On GSX-536
Safe
Stack -On GSX-536-55
Safe
Stack -On GSX-536-59
Safe
Stack -On GSX-536BR
Safe
Stack -On GSX-545
Safe
Stack -On GSX-560 Mechanical
e
Safe
Stack -On GSX-8
Safe
Stack -On GSX-816
Safe
Stack -On GSX-816
e
e
Safe
Stack -On GSX-824
Safe
Stack -On GSX-824
Safe
Stack -On GSX-824GR
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 48 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 398
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On GSX-836
x
Safe
Stack -On GSX-836GR
Safe
Stack -On GSX-845
9;
Safe
Stack -On GSX-845GR
e
Safe
Stack -On GSX-845-GR
x
Safe
Stack -On GSX-848-GR
Safe
Stack -On GSX-860 Electronic
Safe
Stack -On GSX-916
Safe
Stack -On GSX-924
Safe
Stack -On GSX-936
Safe
Stack -On GSX-945
Safe
Stack -On GSX-966
Safe
Stack -On GSXW-528
Safe
Stack -On GSXW-528
Safe
Stack -On GSXW-536
Safe
Stack -On GSXW-828
Safe
Stack -On GSXW-828
Safe
Stack -On GSXW-836
Safe
Stack -On GSXW-936-55
Safe
Stack -On GSXWB-824
Safe
Stack -On H-15-BP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On H-16-BP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On H-16-GB-K-S-DS
Safe
Stack -On H-22-BP-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 49 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 399
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On H-26-GP-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On H-26-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On H-28-BP-E-S
9;
Safe
Stack -On H-32-GP-E-S
e
Safe
Stack -On H-42-GP-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00343
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00344
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00353
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00354
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00355
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00356
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00357
Safe
Stack -On HEH 00358
Safe
Stack -On HEH00212
Safe
Stack -On HEH00216
Safe
Stack -On HEH00223
Safe
Stack -On HEH00613
Safe
Stack -On HEH00889
Safe
Stack -On HEH00890
Safe
Stack -On HEH00893
Safe
Stack -On HEH00894
Safe
Stack -On HEH00895
Safe
Stack -On HEH00900
Safe
Stack -On HEH00901
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 50 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 400
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On HEH00902
x
x
Safe
Stack -On HEH01561
Safe
Stack -On HS-AOD-GB-E
Safe
Stack -On Huntshield-40
e
Safe
Stack -On PFS-012-BG-E
x
Safe
Stack -On PFS-016-BG-E
Safe
Stack -On PFS-019-BG-E
Safe
Stack -On PSF-809k
Safe
Stack -On PSF-817
Safe
Stack -On PSF-817k
Safe
Stack -On PSF-917K
Safe
Stack -On PWS-15522-B
Safe
Stack -On PWS-1822-E
Safe
Stack -On PWS-1855-E
Safe
Stack -On Rangemax-14
_
Safe
Stack -On S-22-DGP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On S-24-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-24-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-24-HGB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On S-24-HGG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On S-24-SP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-24-SP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On S-24-SP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On S-24-SP-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 51 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 401
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On 5-25-GY-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On S-33-GY-E-S
Safe
Stack -On S-36-DGP-B-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-36-DGP-B-S
e
Safe
Stack -On S-36-DGP-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On S-36-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-36-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-36-HGB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On S-36-HGG-C-S
Safe
Stack -On S-36-SP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-36-SP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-36-SP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On S-36-SP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-39-GY-E-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-60-DGP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On 5-60-DGP-E-S-72
Safe
Stack -On SHD-2-MB-PB
Safe
Stack -On SHD-SU-BG-B
Safe
Stack -On SHD-SU-BG-E
Safe
Stack -On SHD-SU-BG-RFID
Safe
Stack -On SS-10-MB-C
Safe
Stack -On SS-10-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On SS-10-MG-C
Safe
Stack -On SS-16-MB-B
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 52 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 402
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On SS-16-MB-C
x
Safe
Stack -On SS-16-MB-E
Safe
Stack -On SS- 16-MG-C
9;
Safe
Stack -On SS-22-MB-C
Safe
Stack -On SS-22-MB-E
x
Safe
Stack -On SS-22-MG-C
Safe
Stack -On SS-8-MB-C
Safe
Stack -On SS-8-MG-C
Safe
Stack -On T3-36-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TB-30-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TC-16-GB-K
Safe
Stack -On TD-040-GP-E
Safe
Stack -On TD14-22-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-22-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-22-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-22-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-28-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-28-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-28-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-28-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-36-GP-C-S
e
Safe
Stack -On TD14-36-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-36-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-36-SB-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 53 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 403
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On TD14-54-GP-C-S
x
Safe
Stack -On TD14-54-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD14-54-SB-C-S
9;
Safe
Stack -On TD14-54-SB-E-S
e
Safe
Stack -On TD14-GB-E
Safe
Stack -On TD14-GG-C
Safe
Stack -On TD-22-GB-E
Safe
Stack -On TD-22-GB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-22-GG-C
Safe
Stack -On TD-22-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-22-GP-E-S
e
e
Safe
Stack -On TD-22-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-22-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-24-GP-B-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-24-GP-B-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-24-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-24-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-24-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-28-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-28-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-28-SB-C
Safe
Stack -On TD-28-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-28-SB-E
Safe
Stack -On TD-28-SB-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 54 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 404
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On TD-32-GB-E
x
Safe
Stack -On TD-32-GG-C
Safe
Stack -On TD-36-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-36-GP-E-S
e
Safe
Stack -On TD-36-MILLS-PC
x
Safe
Stack -On TD-36-SB-C
Safe
Stack -On TD-36-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-36-SB-E
Safe
Stack -On TD-36-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-40-BP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-40-GP-B-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-40-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-40-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-40-SB-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-40-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-54-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-54-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-54-SB-C-S
e
Safe
Stack -On TD-54-SB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD55-24-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD55-60-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-69-GP-C-S
Safe
Stack -On TD-69-GP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TDS-30-GP-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 55 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 405
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Stack -On TDS-30-MB-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On TDS-35-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TDS-36-DGP-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TDS-40-BP-E-S
e
Safe
Stack -On TDS-42-SG-E-S
x
Safe
Stack -On TDS-528
Safe
Stack -On TDS-536
Safe
Stack -On TDS-545
Safe
Stack -On TDS-60-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TDS-828
Safe
Stack -On TDS-836
Safe
Stack -On TDS-845
Safe
Stack -On TDSS-60-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TS-20-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On TSS-15-MB-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W15-22-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W15-35-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W15-60-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W-22-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W-24-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W-35-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W-40-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W-60-BH-E-S
Safe
Stack -On W-69-BH-E-S
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 56 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 406
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Safe
Union Safe Company 64008
x
_
Safe
Union Safe Company 64009
Safe
Union Safe Company 64010
Safe
Union Safe Company 64011
e
_
Safe
Winchester Bandit 10
x
Safe
Winchester Bandit 14
Safe
Winchester Bandit 19
Safe
Winchester Bandit 31
Safe
Winchester Safes TS-9-11
Trigger Lock
Allen Company 15415
_
Trigger Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 110150
_
Trigger Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 110151
_
Trigger Lock
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD8000
Trigger Lock
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD8001
Trigger Lock
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD8003
_
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC) FSDC-
TL4167BCB
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3005BKD
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3030BKD
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3045BKA
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL305ORKD
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3060BKA
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3095RKA
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 57 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 407
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3248BCB
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3969RCB
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL4000RKD Trigger Lock
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL4379RCB
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL4853RCB
Trigger Lock
Gun Vault Inc. BV-0I Breech Vault
Trigger Lock
Master Lock 106
Trigger Lock
Nortek Security & Control LLC 2GIG-GNGRDI-345
_
Trigger Lock
Pro-Lok GL500
Trigger Lock
Pro-Lok GL550
Trigger Lock
Pro-Lok GL600
Trigger Lock
Pro-Lok GL650
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales M2018
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RTL3248
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RTL4167
Trigger Lock/
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC) LB4000-
B1/FSDC-TL4000RKD
Trigger Lock/
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC) LB4000-
B1/Pro-Lok GL650
Wall Safe
Homak Manufacturing hrc. WS00018002
*
_
Wall Safe
Stack -On PWS-1522
RETAIL DEVICES
Page 58 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 408
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
DEVICES THAT ARE SOLD AS OEM EQUIPMENT
Cable Lock
Adstar Inc. AB-106
k
Cable Lock
Adstar Inc. AB- 106-A
Cable Lock
Adstar Inc. AB-107
Cable Lock
Allen Company 15417
Cable Lock
Allen Company 15418
Cable Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 399390000
_
Cable Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 399390000 (red)
_
Cable Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 411380000 (green)
_
Cable Lock
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. 411380000 (red)
_
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL 062012
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL012014
_
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL860
Cable Lock
DAC Technologies CL885
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CL1010BKD
Cable Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
CLI020RKD
Cable Lock
Import Traders ITI-4000
Cable Lock
M USA IM USA 006000000
_
Cable Lock
Keng's Firearms Specialties GE5020
_
Cable Lock
Keng's Firearms Specialties GE5024
_
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCLO1
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCLOIA
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCLOIB
_
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCLO1-P
OEM DEVICES
Page 59 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 409
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCLOI-P-PCS
x
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCL02
_
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCL02B
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCL02C
_
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCL02-P
x
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCL02-P-11R
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCL02-P-15R
Cable Lock
Mascon Inc. MCL03
Cable Lock
Master Lock 107PCS
Cable Lock
Master Lock 109
k
Cable Lock
Master Lock 109PCS
Cable Lock
Mossberg R10SC
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe 107 China
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe AB106B China
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe CLA15
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe CLD-14 (Steel Key)
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe DCDBAI5
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe GL710-NSSF Taiwan R.O.C.
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe R15SC3P
Cable Lock
Project ChildSafe RX14SC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales CLA14
_
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales CLA15
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales CLC10
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales CLD-14 (Brass Key)
OEM DEVICES
Page 60 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 410
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales CLD-14 (Steel Key)
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCDBA15
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCDB-D15
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCSC-5DTACA
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCSC-5DTAC-A14
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCSC-5DTACA-S14
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCSC-5DTACB
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCSC-5DTAC-C10
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales DCSC-5DTACC-S10
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R07C1
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R07SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R10-LC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R10LC1
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R10SC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R10SC1
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R10SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R10SCA
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RI ISC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RI ISC1
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RI 1 SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15-LC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15LC1
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15LC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RI 5-SC
OEM DEVICES
Page 61 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 411
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15SC1
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15SC1P
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15SC3
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15SC3P
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15SCA
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales R15-SU
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RX10SC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RX14LC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RX14SC
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales SLA14
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales SLA15
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales SLC10
Cable Lock
Regal Industrial Sales SLC10S
Cable Lock
Remington MCL02
_ k
Cable Lock
Shot Lock Corp. Kimber "Shot Lock 10000PTR-2"
Cable Lock
Shot Lock Corp. Weatherby ZMI4047
Cable Lock
Springfield Armory GE5020 Springfield
_
Cable Lock
Springfield Armory GE5024 XD
_
Cable Lock
Sturm, Ruger & Co. R15LC1
Cable Lock
The Sports Products SP00224
Cable Lock
Umarex 9993542A
Cable Lock
Uni-Hardware Ltd LPV/300
Cable Lock
Walther R15SC3
Integral
Beretta B-Lok 8000 Series
OEM DEVICES
Page 62 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 412
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers
Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Integral
Beretta B-Lok 90 Series
Integral
Beretta B-Lok 9000-series
Integral
Sako Sako Key Concept
Integral
Sig Arms P229-40
Integral
Taurus 17
Integral/Padlo
Ruger KOUG2-5010 Lock Assembly 12 ga.
Internal
Remington Integrated Security System (ISS)
Lock Box
American Security Products PB3
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD1030
Lock Box
Bulldog Cases & Vaults BD1035
Lock Box
Bunker Hill Security Handgun Safe 61581
Lock Box
Gun Vault Inc. QV2000
Lock Box
Honeywell 5101DOJ
Lock Box
Honeywell 5301DOJ
Lock Box
Pro-Lok GL100C
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV 1000
Lock Box
ProSteel Security Products Browning PV500
Lock Box
Stack -On GC-500-5
Lock Box
Stack -On PSF-712
Other/External
Marlin MFC-10/Shot Lock 40mm
Other/External
Marlin MFC-20/Shot Lock 40mm
Other/External
Marlin MFC25/Shotlock XS 1240
Other/External
Marlin MFC-30/Shot Lock 40mm
>�
Other/External
Mossberg SSI Clamshell
OEM DEVICES
Page 63 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 413
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Other/External
Regal Industrial Sales M2005
Other/External
Ruger PM-151/R501.5 Padlock
Other/External
Ruger PM-151/SLHD-150 Padlock
Other/External
Ruger PM-152/SLHD-150 Padlock
_
_
_
Other/External
Ruger PM-153/R503.5 Padlock
_
_
_
_
Other/External
Ruger PM-153/SLHD-150 Padlock
_
_
_
Other/External
Ruger PM- 154/Armadillo 50mm Padlock
_
_
_
Other/External
Shot Lock Corp. SLC-1040
Other/External
Shot Lock Corp. SLC-2040
Other/External
Shot Lock Corp. SLC-3040
Other/Internal
Benelli BLK 12 (right hand)
Other/Internal
Benelli BLK 20 (right hand)
Other/Internal
Beretta Chamber Lock
Other/Intemal
Federal Defense Industries FDI Magazine Lock No. 1
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 4015-1.5" Shackle
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 4025-2.5" Shackle
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 4035-3.5" Shackle
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 4050-5" Shackle
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 5015 1-1/2"
Shackle
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 5025 2-1/2"
Shackle
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 5035 3-1/2"
Shackle
Padlock
Armadillo Firearm Security Products 5050 5" Shackle
Padlock
Master Lock 528 Curved Shackle Padlock
OEM DEVICES
Page 64 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 414
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 4015NV-A
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5015A w/vinyl cover
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5015ANV no vinyl
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5025-A
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5025ANV no vinyl
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5035A w/vinyl cover
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5035ANV no vinyl
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5050-A
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales 5050ANV no vinyl
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R401.5 NV
_ k
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R501.5
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R501.5 NV
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R502.5
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R502.5 NV
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R503.5
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R503.5 NV
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R505.0
_ k
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales R505.0 NV
_
�c
Padlock
Regal Industrial Sales SL40-5PT3
Padlock
Ruger 4015
Padlock
Ruger 4015 NV/Regal R401.5 NV
Padlock
Ruger 4025NV
Padlock
Ruger 5015
Padlock
Ruger5015
OEM DEVICES
Page 65 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 415
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers
Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns
Caliber Specific
Padlock
Ruger 5015
Padlock
Ruger 5015 NV/Regal R501.5 NV
Padlock
Ruger 5015/Regal R501.5
Padlock
Ruger 5015NV
Padlock
Ruger 5025
Padlock
Ruger 5025
Padlock
Ruger 5025 NV/Regal R502.5 NV
Padlock
Ruger 5025/Regal R502.5
Padlock
Ruger 5025NV
Padlock
Ruger 5025NV
Padlock
Ruger 5035
Padlock
Ruger 5035
Padlock
Ruger 5035/Regal R503.5
Padlock
Ruger 5050
Padlock
Ruger 5050
Padlock
Ruger 5050/Regal R505.0
_
Padlock
Ruger 5050NV
Padlock
Ruger 5050NV
Padlock
Ruger Ruger 4015
Padlock
Ruger Ruger 4025
Padlock
Ruger Ruger 4035
Padlock
Ruger Ruger4050
Padlock
Ruger Ruger 5025
Padlock
Shot Lock Corp. SL40-100
OEM DEVICES
Page 66 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 416
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers Pistols
Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Padlock
Shot Lock Corp. SL40-238
Padlock
Shot Lock Corp. SL40-500
Padlock/Clam
Regal Industrial Sales 5015-A w/clamp 151
Padlock/Clam
Regal Industrial Sales 5015-A w/clamp 152
Padlock/Clam
Regal Industrial Sales 5035-A w/clamp 153
Padlock/Clam
Regal Industrial Sales R40mm-1mm/MFC-30
Padlock/Clam
RugerPM151/R501.5
Padlock/Clam
RugerPM153/R503.5
Padlock/Clam
Ruger PM267/Lock 5015A
Safe
American Security Products DV652
Safe
Cannon Safe TS5518F-AR
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. P-592420 "Pony" -
Winchester
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. R-592320 'Ranger" -
Winchester
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. S-593022 "Silverado" -
Winchester
Safe
Granite Security Products, Inc. W-592822 "Western" -
Winchester
Safe
Rhino Metals, Inc. LSB 1818P
Safe
Rhino Metals, Inc. LSB2418P
Safe
Safari Safe Co. S5521EF
Safe
Safari Safe Co. S5521M
Safe
Sentry Safe T-6 No Backer Plate
Safe
Stack -On GCG-908
>�
Trigger Lock
Allen Company 15416
Trigger Lock
Child Guard CS-100
OEM DEVICES
Page 67 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 417
9.8.c
FSD Type
FSD
Revolvers Pistols Derringers Rifles
Shotguns Caliber Specific
Trigger Lock
Firearm Safety Device Corporation (FSDC)
TL3457RCB
Trigger Lock
Pro-Lok GL200C
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales M2006
_ _ _
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales M2007
_ _ _
_
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales M2007-J
_ _ _
_
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales M5070
_ _ _ k
_
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RTL06
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RTL06 (Brass Key)
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RTL06 (Steel Key)
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RTL 10
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RTL464
Trigger Lock
Regal Industrial Sales RX14SU
Trigger Lock
Remington 870 Express Aluminum Two -Dot ISS
Trigger Guard
Trigger Lock
Remington 870 Express Plastic Two -Dot ISS Trigger
Guard
OEM DEVICES
Page 68 of 68 Report Generated 10/17/2018 9:40:50 AM
Packet Pg. 418
9.8.c
Everett Daily Herald
Affidavit of Publication
State of Washington }
County of Snohomish } ss
Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the first publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH831975 ORD 4130 & 4131
as it was published in the regular and entire
issue of said paper and not as a supplement
form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such
publication commencing on 10/28/2018 and
ending on 10/28/2018 and that said newspaper
was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period.
The amount of the fee for such publication is
$36.12.
A3t�o/j/
Subscribed and sworn before me on this
T day of
611
Notary Public in a d for the State of
Washington.
City of Edmonds -LEGAL ADS 114101416
SCOTT PASSITY
RECEIVED
NOV 0 12018
EDMONDS CITY CLERK
Z AUBREY KNAPP
Notary Public
State of Washington
My Commission Expires
July 30, 2022
Packet Pg. 419
9.8.c
Classified Proof
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
of Ina Clty of Ed"" Wos1.rqIon
On the 21d day of October. 2018, tnn Cily Council of the City of
Etlmands, posed fho f000wing Ordnances. Ina summaries of said
ul dlnarlCBS S011V7ting of athls xr8 nfaVldetl a$ fObOWf.
ORDINANCE NO 4130
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON AMENDING EDMONDS CITY CODE,
CHAPTER 10.55 ENTITLED, 'EDMONDS YOUTH
COMMISSION"
ORDINANCE NO. 4131
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SAFE STORAGE OF
AND ACCESS TO FIREARMS, RELATING TO THE
REPORTING OF LOST OR STOLEN FIREARMS,
AMENDING ORDINANCES 4120 AND 4121, AND DEFINING
'LUGGING DEVICE" BY INCORPORATING A LIST OF
APPROVED DEVICES
The full text of these Ordinances will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 24th day of October, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Published: October 28, 2018. EDH831975
RECEIVED
Nov 012018
EDMONDS CITY CLERK
Proofed by Sheppard, Dicy, 10/29/2018 11:09:16 am Page: 2
Packet Pg. 420
9.8.d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY
3RETT BASS, an individual; CURTIS
gCCULLOUGH, an individual; and SWAN No. 18-2-07049-31
3EABERG, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
V.
'Y OF EDMONDS, a municipality;
MONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT, a
artment of the City of Edmonds,
Defendants.
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS MAI-rER having come on regularly for hearing before the undersigned Judge on
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Court having reviewed
1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment;
2. Declaration of Eric A. Lindberg in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
Judgment, and exhibits thereto;
3. Declaration of Brett Bass in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
Judgment;
4. Declaration of Curtis McCullough in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONT FOR SUMMARY CORR CRON[N LLP
«s
JUDGMENT — I 1001 Fourih Avenue, Suite 3900
Seattle, Washington 98154-1051 Q
Tel (206) 625-8600
COPY Fax (206) 625-0900
Packet Pg. 421
9.8.d
r�
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
5.
c
tsl
m
Summary Judgment; N
4-
0
Declaration of Swan Seaberg in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
a
Judgment;
r
6. Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and M
Go
U2
Cross -Motion for Summary Judgment; t
M
00
7. Declaration of Jessica L. Goldman in Support of Defendant City of Edmonds'
0
Cross -Motion for Summary Judgment; and exhibits thereto;
EI
8. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and
9. Declaration of Eric Lindberg in Support of Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of
E
Motion for Summary Judgment; L to '
0
and the files and records herein, and deeming itself fully advised; r ��� (t S OMN c
h wv; O
COURT
THE CRT MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDING
�. Mo Ild Im is l�e•3-� t �1 6)�Ui`�,Z�S•^ a
Z.4. The Plaintiffs have standing to challenge E onds City Code Chanter ,
3 RCW 9.41.290 is intended to create statewide uniformity of firearms reg lations;
The Legislature fully preempted the field of firearm regulation wi hin the
c
boundaries of the state in RCW 9.41.290;
c�'Z,6.OZ0 a
5 yl' Edmonds City Code Edmonds City Code Chapter impermissibly regulates
firearms in violation of RCW 9.41.290; i
0
L
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
fog �- o, nl r rlec� 0
1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 0 j
0
2. Plaintiffs have satisfied the requirements for injunctive relief; o�
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT - 2
0
N
C
E
� I
CORR CRONIN LLP
V
1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3900
+�
Seattle, Washington 98154-1051
Q
Tel (206) 625-8600
Fax (206) 625-0900
Packet Pg. 422
9.8.d
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3. Defendants, and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, are hereby
PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from enforcement of Edmonds City Code Chapter, uW because
-J` peI�&t ojq�QCal� 5,d4,.,oa0
those provisions are preempted and repealed by RCW 9.41.290.E
1Aak (Y\(lCiGl � i 1 —ice A-(,)cue-5�
CcD r CIO 2S
n CA P p4eA 1 t S 0 ( CA It St cki J (1 (Y\ j (--P ?a I2
DONE IN OPEN COURT this 1 day of 2019.
HON. ANITA F RRIS
Presented by:
CORR CRONIN LLP
Steven W. Fogg, WSBA No. 23528
Eric A. Lindberg, WSBA No. 43596
1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3900
Seattle, Washington 98154
(206) 625-8600 (Phone)
sfogg@corrcronin.com
elindberg@corrcronin.com
ttorneys for Plaintiffs
firm
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY CORR CRONIN LLP
JUDGMENT-3 1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3900
Seattle, Washington 98154-1051
Tel (206) 625-8600
Fax (206) 625-0900
Packet Pg. 423
FILE
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON
APRIL 21, 2022
I
CHIEF .TUSTI
9.8.e
THIS OPINION VZ
FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON
APRIL 21, 2022
c
ERIN L. LENNON +�
SUPREME COURT CLERH Q'
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
BRETT BASS, an individual; )
CURTIS MCCULLOUGH, an )
Individual; SWAN SEABERG, an )
Individual; THE SECOND )
AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, )
INC., a Washington nonprofit )
Corporation; and NATIONAL RIFLE)
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, )
INC., a New York nonprofit )
Association; )
Plaintiffs, )
V. 1
CITY OF EDMONDS, a
municipality; EDMONDS POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a department of the
City of Edmonds,
Defendants. )
No. 99596-6
En Banc
Filed: April 21, 2022
GONZALEZ, C.J. — Under our system of divided government, many elected
bodies hold legislative power, including elected city councils. These councils,
however, must legislate within constitutional constraints. One of those constraints is
that city ordinances must not "conflict with general laws" that have been enacted by
Packet Pg. 424
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
the people of our state by initiative or by our state legislature. WASH. CONST. art. XI,
§ 11. Constitutional general laws that state they explicitly occupy the field, that
implicitly occupy the field, or that are otherwise inconsistent with local laws preempt
local lawmaking. We are asked today whether a city ordinance that requires that guns
be stored safely and kept out of unauthorized hands is preempted by state law. We
hold that it is.
BACKGROUND
After robust debate following a mass shooting at the nearby Marysville
Pilchuck High School, the Edmonds City Council adopted an ordinance requiring
residents to safely store their firearms when not in use. Ordinance 4120, codified as
Edmonds City Code (ECC) chapter 5.26. The ordinance contains two operative
provisions. Under the "storage provision,"
It shall be a civil infraction for any person to store or keep any firearm in any
premises unless such weapon is secured by a locking device, properly engaged
so as to render such weapon inaccessible or unusable to any person other than
the owner or other lawfully authorized user.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this section, such weapon shall
be deemed lawfully stored or lawfully kept if carried by or under the control of
the owner or other lawfully authorized user.
ECC 5.26.020. Under the "unauthorized access" provision,
It shall be a civil infraction if any person knows or reasonably should know that
a minor, an at -risk person, or a prohibited person is likely to gain access to a
firearm belonging to or under the control of that person, and a minor, an at -risk
person, or a prohibited person obtains the firearm.
ECC 5.26.030. Violation of either provision carries a fine. ECC 5.26.040.
2
Packet Pg. 425
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
At around the same time, Washington voters enacted Initiative 1639. LAWS OF
2019, ch. 3. This initiative, among many other things, criminalizes unsafe storage of
firearms but in more limited circumstances than Edmonds' ordinance. Compare RCW
9.41.360, with ECC 5.26.020, .030. The initiative specifically did not "mandate[] how
or where a firearm must be stored." RCW 9.41.360(6).
The plaintiffs' challenged the ordinance as preempted by state law. The city
moved to dismiss on the theory that the challengers did not have standing. Based on
the facts alleged in the initial complaint, the trial judge found the plaintiffs had
standing to challenge the safe storage section of the ordinance, ECC 5.26.020, but not
the unauthorized access section, ECC 5.26.030, since they had not alleged facts that
would tend to show an unauthorized person would get access to their weapons.
Later, both sides moved for summary judgment. Report of Proceedings at 3
The trial judge renewed her earlier determination that the plaintiffs had standing to
challenge the safe storage portion of the ordinance, ECC 5.26.020, but not the
unauthorized access portion, ECC 5.26.030. She concluded that the storage portion of
the ordinance was preempted by state law.
Both sides appealed. The Court of Appeals concluded that the plaintiffs had
standing to challenge the entire ordinance and that the ordinance was preempted by
1 The current plaintiffs are Brett Bass, Curtis McCullough, and Swan Seaberg. They were joined
on the complaint by the Second Amendment Foundation Inc. and the National Rifle Association
of America Inc. The record suggests these organizations withdrew as parties to avoid discovery
requests but continue to fund the litigation.
3
Packet Pg. 426
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
state law. City of Edmonds v. Bass, 16 Wn. App. 2d 488, 495, 497, 481 P.3d 596
(2021). We granted review. 198 Wn.2d 1009 (2021). The city is supported by the
cities of Seattle, Walla Walla, Olympia, and Kirkland, as well as Brady and
Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility.
ANALYSIS
This case is here on review of summary judgment, presenting only issues of
law. Our review is de novo. Wash. Ass'n for Substance Abuse & Violence Prevention
v. State, 174 Wn.2d 642, 652, 278 P.3d 632 (2012) (citing Pierce County v. State, 150
Wn.2d 422, 429, 78 P.3d 640 (2003)). Summary judgment is appropriate when there
is no genuine dispute as to any material question of fact and the moving party is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law. CR 56(c). Municipal ordinances are
presumed valid, and the burden is on the challenger to establish otherwise.
Winkenwerder v. City of Yakima, 52 Wn.2d 617, 624, 328 P.2d 873 (1958) (citing City
of Spokane v. Coon, 3 Wn.2d 243, 100 P.2d 36 (1940)).
1. Standing
The city does not contest the plaintiffs' standing to challenge the storage
portion of the ordinance. It contends that the plaintiffs lack standing to challenge the
unauthorized access portion of the ordinance because they have not established they
are likely to violate it. We conclude the plaintiffs have standing.
The plaintiffs brought their case under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act,
chapter 7.24 RCW, and sought injunctive relief under chapter 7.40 RCW. Under the
11
Packet Pg. 427
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, "[a] person ... whose rights, status or other
legal relations are affected by a statute[] [or] municipal ordinance ... may have
determined any question of construction or validity arising under the ... statute[] [or]
ordinance ... and obtain a declaration of rights." RCW 7.24.020. The city has
challenged the plaintiffs' standing to bring a declaratory judgment action. We use the
common law test for standing to determine whether someone has standing under this
act. Wash. State Hous. Fin. Comm'n v. Nat'l Homebuyers Fund, Inc., 193 Wn.2d
704, 711, 445 P.3d 533 (2019) (citing Grant County Fire Prot. Dist. No. 5 v. City of
Moses Lake, 150 Wn.2d 791, 802, 83 P.3d 419 (2004)). Under that test, a person has
standing if (1) the interest they seek to protect "`is arguably within the zone of
interests to be protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee in
question"' and (2) "`the challenged action has caused injury in fact, economic or
otherwise, to the party seeking standing."' Id. at 711-12 (internal quotation marks
omitted) (quoting Grant County, 150 Wn.2d at 802). Courts take a more liberal
approach to standing for questions of major public importance. See Farris v. Munro,
99 Wn.2d 326, 330, 662 P.2d 821 (1983) (quoting Wash. Nat. Gas Co. v. Pub. Util.
Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish County, 77 Wn.2d 94, 96, 459 P.2d 633 (1969)).
Standing under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act "is not intended to be a
particularly high bar. Instead, the doctrine serves to prevent a litigant from raising
another's legal right." Wash. State Hous. Fin. Comm'n, 193 Wn.2d at 712 (citing
Grant County, 150 Wn.2d at 802). Plaintiffs plainly meet the first element of the
5
Packet Pg. 428
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
common law test —the plaintiffs own and store firearms. They are within the zone of
interests regulated.
The city, in essence, argues that to satisfy the second element, the plaintiffs
must show "`actual, concrete harm"' and that they have failed to do so because they
have not shown they are likely to violate the statute. Pet'r City of Edmonds' Suppl
Br. at 20 (quoting Walker v. Munro, 124 Wn.2d 402, 412, 879 P.2d 920 (1994)). But
this mistakes the sufficient for the necessary. Walker mentions "actual, concrete
harm" in describing what the challengers there had failed to show. Actual, concrete
harm is sufficient to establish injury in fact. It is not, however, necessary. See To-Ro
Trade Shows v. Collins, 144 Wn.2d 403, 417, 27 P.3d 1149 (2001) (citing
Diversified Indus. Dev. Corp. v. Ripley, 82 Wn.2d 811, 815, 514 P.2d 137 (1973)).
Plaintiffs have testified they keep firearms unsecured and unlocked even when
children are in their homes. Regardless of whether plaintiffs subjectively believe they
are storing their firearms in such a way to keep them out of the hands of children and
others who should not have access to them, should a prohibited person get access to
their firearms, the plaintiffs could be charged with a civil infraction that carries a
potentially heavy penalty. These consequences are sufficient to establish the injury -
in -fact element of standing. Therefore, they have standing to bring this challenge.2
2 In contrast, this court recently concluded that a plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the
alleged improper positioning of a traffic camera monitoring vehicle speeds in a school zone. See
Williams v. City of Spokane, 199 Wn.2d 236, _ P.3d _ (2022). There, the plaintiff had not
challenged his own ticket for speeding in that school zone, establishing, as a matter of law, that
he had been properly ticketed. Id. at 247-48. Accordingly, the plaintiff in Williams lacked
C
Packet Pg. 429
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
2. Preemption
We turn now to whether state law has occupied the field or otherwise preempts
this ordinance. Cities have broad police power under article XI, section 11 of our
state constitution. Municipal exercises of police power, however, may "not ...
conflict with general laws." WASH. CONST. art. XI, § 11; see also Cont'l Baking Co. v.
City of Mt. Vernon, 182 Wash. 68, 72, 44 P.2d 821 (1935) (citing Detamore v.
Hindley, 83 Wash. 322,145 P. 462 (1915)).
The plaintiffs contend that both operative portions of the ordinance are
preempted by RCW 9.41.290. "A state statute preempts an ordinance if the statute
occupies the field or if the statute and the ordinance irreconcilably conflict." Watson
v. City of Seattle, 189 Wn.2d 149, 171, 401 P.3d 1 (2017) (citing Brown v. City of
Yakima, 116 Wn.2d 556, 559, 807 P.2d 353 (1991)). Older cases have held that "[a]
statute will not be construed as taking away the power of a municipality to legislate
unless this intent is clearly and expressly stated." State ex rel. Schillberg v. Everett
Dist. Justice Court, 92 Wn.2d 106, 108, 594 P.2d 448 (1979) (citing Nelson v. City of
Seattle, 64 Wn.2d 862, 866, 395 P.2d 82 (1964)). We have since found that the intent
to occupy the field may be implied. Watson, 189 Wn.2d at 171 (citing Brown, 116
Wn.2d at 560). We consider both the specific preemption statute and any related
statutes that shed light on legislative intent. See Dep't of Ecology v. Campbell &
standing because there was no "`actual, present and existing dispute."' Id. (internal quotation
marks omitted) (quoting League of Educ. Voters v. State, 176 Wn.2d 808, 816, 295 P.3d 743
(2013)).
7
Packet Pg. 430
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
Gwinn, LLC, 146 Wn.2d 1, 11-12, 43 P.3d 4 (2002) (citing Cockle v. Dep't of Labor
& Indus., 142 Wn.2d 801, 808, 16 P.3d 583 (2001)).
Our legislature has limited local firearm regulation for decades. The current
preemption statute says:
The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the entire field of
firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state, including the registration,
licensing, possession, purchase, sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge, and
transportation of firearms, or any other element relating to firearms or parts
thereof, including ammunition and reloader components. Cities, towns, and
counties or other municipalities may enact only those laws and ordinances
relating to firearms that are specifically authorized by state law, as in RCW
9.41.300, and are consistent with this chapter. Such local ordinances shall have
the same penalty as provided for by state law. Local laws and ordinances that
are inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state
law shall not be enacted and are preempted and repealed, regardless of the
nature of the code, charter, or home rule status of such city, town, county, or
municipality.
RCW 9.41.290; see also LAWS of 1983, ch. 232, § 12 ("Cities, towns, and counties
may enact only those laws and ordinances relating to firearms that are consistent
with this chapter. Local laws and ordinances that are inconsistent with, more
restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state law shall not be enacted.").
While the legislature's intent to occupy the entire field of firearm regulation is
clear, not every municipal action that touches on firearms is within that field. For
example, RCW 9.41.290 does not prevent a municipality from barring its employees
from carrying concealed weapons while on duty. See Cherry v. Municipality of
Metropolitan Seattle, 116 Wn.2d 794, 800, 808 P.2d 746 (1991). After reviewing
relevant legislative history, this court concluded that "the Legislature ... sought to
Packet Pg. 431
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
eliminate a multiplicity of local laws relating to firearms and to advance uniformity in
criminal firearms regulation" and that "[t]he `laws and ordinances' preempted are
laws of application to the general public." Id. at 801. Since the personnel policy was
not a law of general application, it was not preempted by the statute.
Similarly, RCW 9.41.290 did not prevent a city from imposing strict rules on a
gun show held at a municipal convention center. See Pac. Nw. Shooting ParkAss'n v
City of Sequim, 158 Wn.2d 342, 356-57, 144 P.3d 276 (2006). Not only were the
restrictions not laws of general application, cities have specific statutory authority to
regulate gun possession in municipal convention centers and general proprietary
authority to limit how their convention centers could be used. Id. at 355-56 (citing
RCW 9.41.300), 357 (citing Cherry, 116 Wn.2d at 802). Accordingly, the city could
impose the rules.
Not all rules of general application that touch on firearms are preempted by
RCW 9.41.290. For example, RCW 9.41.290 does not prevent a city from taxing
firearms and ammunition. Watson, 189 Wn.2d at 156. While we acknowledge that
some regulations could masquerade as taxes, the Watson plaintiffs failed to show that
the particular tax was a regulation. Id. Since RCW 9.41.290 preempted only firearm
regulations, not taxes, the tax was not preempted. Id.
Similarly, the Court of Appeals found that RCW 9.41.290 did not preempt a
county ordinance requiring shooting facilities to obtain operating permits. Kitsap
County v. Kitsap Rifle & Revolver Club, 1 Wn. App. 2d 393, 399, 405 P.3d 1026
E
Packet Pg. 432
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
(2017). The court noted that on its face, the preemption statute did not reference
regulating shooting facilities. Id. at 406. The court also noted that the ordinance
"impose[d] requirements only on owners and operators of shooting facilities, not on
the individuals who discharge firearms at those facilities." Id. at 407. The court also
noted (among many other things) that the legislature had explicitly given
municipalities the power to "enact ordinances restricting the discharge of firearms
`where there is a reasonable likelihood that humans, domestic animals, or property
will be jeopardized."' Id. at 409 (quoting RCW 9.41.300(2)(a)).
Taken together, these cases establish that RCW 9.41.290 broadly preempts
local ordinances that directly regulate firearms themselves, but not necessarily
ordinances that have an incidental effect on the use and enjoyment of firearms or
exercises of municipal authority that do not establish rules of general application to
the public.
The city argues that the legislature intended only to preempt regulation in the
nine statutorily enumerated areas: "registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale,
acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms." RCW 9.41.290. But
the preemption statute begins with "[t]he state of Washington fully occupies and
preempts the entire field of firearms regulation." Id. Given that broad introductory
phrase, we conclude the list is illustrative, not exclusive.
In the alternative, the city argues that RCW 9.41.290 does not preempt storage
and unauthorized access regulations under the principle of ejusdem generis. "The rule
10
Packet Pg. 433
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
of ejusdem generis requires that general terms appearing in a statute in connection
with specific terms are to be given meaning and effect only to the extent that the
general terms suggest similar items to those designated by the specific terms."
Silverstreak, Inc. v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 159 Wn.2d 868, 882, 154 P.3d 891
(2007) (citing Davis v. Dep't of Licensing, 137 Wn.2d 957, 970, 977 P.2d 554
(1999)). The city suggests the nine enumerated items on the list can be divided into
two topics: firearms transactions ("registration, licensing, ... purchase, sale,
acquisition, [and] transfer") and active use of firearms ("possession ... discharge, and
transportation"). Since the ordinance does not apply to guns in the owner's
possession, it argues that ordinances pertaining to storage are not preempted.
We decline to limit the preemption statute to firearms' transactions and active
use. That limitation is simply not consistent with the words of the statute as a whole.
Under that statute, "[t]he state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the
entire field of firearms regulation." RCW 9.41.290 (emphasis added). The key
question is whether the ordinance regulates firearms —not whether it regulates firearm
transactions or active use.
The legislature plainly meant to broadly preempt local lawmaking concerning
firearms except where specifically authorized in chapter 9.41 RCW or other statutes.
The city was acting in its regulatory, not proprietary, role and without the sort of
explicit or necessarily implied authorization present in Watson, 189 Wn.2d 149,
Pacific Northwest Shooting Park, 158 Wn.2d 342, or Kitsap Rifle & Revolver Club, 1
11
Packet Pg. 434
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
Wn. App. 2d 393. Nor was the city acting as an employer as in Cherry, 116 Wn.2d
794. Accordingly, we hold that this ordinance is preempted by state law.3
One volume of the record arrived at the court marked "sealed." Clerk's Papers
at 301-99. This volume included considerable material, such as a newspaper article
and minutes of city meetings, that plainly should not have been sealed under article 1,
section 10 of the Washington State Constitution. See Dreiling v. Jain, 151 Wn.2d
900, 915, 93 P.3d 861 (2004) (holding that the documents filed in support of
dispositive motions may be sealed only under the five -factor test established by
Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa, 97 Wn.2d 30, 37-39, 640 P.2d 716 (1982)). The trial
court's sealing order was not designated on appeal. We remand this matter to the trial
court to make any corrections necessary such that only documents that have been
properly sealed under article I, section 10 are sealed, and to inform our clerk's office
of any corresponding corrections to the record on appeal that should be made.
CONCLUSION
We hold that the plaintiffs have standing and that this ordinance is preempted
by RCW 9.41.290. We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for
further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
3 Given that we resolve this case based on field preemption, we do not reach arguments about the
intersection of this law and Initiative 1639. Nor do we reach the city's argument that ambiguous
statutes should be construed against preemption or their arguments below concerning jurisdiction
and justiciability generally.
12
Packet Pg. 435
Bass v. City of Edmonds, No. 99596-6
9.8.e
WE CONCUR:
9 Johnson, J.
Madsen, J.
Owen�
f Step}�ens, J.
13
cccKq�.
Gonzatez, C.J
Gordon McCloud, I
Yu —
_ �I V
1VIo toya-Lewis, J.}
Whitener, J.
a+
Q
Packet Pg. 436
FILED
SUPREME COURT
STATE OF WASHINGTON
5/1312022
BY ERIN L. LENNON
CLERK
THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
BRETT BASS, an individual; CURTIS
MCCULLOUGH, an Individual; SWAN
SEABERG, an Individual; THE SECOND
AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., a
Washington nonprofit Corporation; and
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF
AMERICA, INC., a New York nonprofit
Association;,
Plaintiffs,
V.
CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipality; EDMONDS
POLICE DEPARTMENT, a department of the City
of Edmonds,
Defendants.
MANDATE
Supreme Court No. 99596-6
Court of Appeals No. 80755-2-1
Snohomish County Superior Court
No. 18-2-070493-1
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: The Superior Court of the State of Washington
in and for Snohomish County
The opinion of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington was filed on April 21,
2022, and became the decision terminating review of this Court in the above entitled case on
May 11, 2022. This case is mandated to the superior court from which the appellate review was
taken for further proceedings in accordance with the attached true copy of the opinion.
N
N
O
N
M
i
Packet Pg. 437
9.8.f
Page 2
No. 99596-6
MANDATE
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand and affixed the seal of this Court at
Olympia, Washington, on May 13, 2022.
SARAH R. PENDLETON
Deputy Clerk of the Supreme Court
State of Washington
cc: Clerk, Snohomish County Superior Court
Jessica L. Goldman
Molly Thomas -Jensen
Eric Tirschwell
Steven Walter Fogg
Eric A. Lindberg
Jeffrey Burton Taraday
Reporter of Decisions
N
N
O
N
M
i
Packet Pg. 438
9.8.g
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 5.26 OF THE
EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO SAFE GUN
STORAGE AS WELL AS ORDINANCES 4120, 4121, AND
4131.
WHEREAS, on July 24, 2018, the Edmonds City Council adopted Ordinance 4120; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4120 established certain regulations related to the safe storage of
firearms, which were subsequently codified in chapter 5.26 of the Edmonds City Code; and
and
WHEREAS, on July 24, 2018, the Edmonds City Council also adopted Ordinance 4121;
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4121 amended the city's regulations related to the reporting of
lost or stolen firearms, which are codified in chapter 5.24 of the Edmonds City Code; and
and
WHEREAS, on October 23, 2018, the Edmonds City Council adopted Ordinance 4131;
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4131 amended Ordinances 4120 and 4121 to further define what
constitutes a proper locking device under those ordinances; and
WHEREAS, these ordinances were challenged in a lawsuit filed on August 7, 2018 by
Brett Bass, Swan Seaberg, The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., and The National Rifle
Association of America, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, that lawsuit was ruled on by the superior court, the court of appeals, and
ultimately the supreme court; and
WHEREAS, the Washington Supreme Court, filed an opinion (Bass v. City of Edmonds,
199 Wash.2d 403) on April 21, 2022 in which it held that the above ordinances are preempted by
state law, specifically RCW 9.41.290; and
WHEREAS, RCW 9.41.290, which was adopted in 1983 and was last amended in 1994
states as follows:
Packet Pg. 439
9.8.g
The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the
entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the
state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase,
sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms,
or any other element relating to firearms or parts thereof, including
ammunition and reloader components. Cities, towns, and counties
or other municipalities may enact only those laws and ordinances
relating to firearms that are specifically authorized by state law, as
in RCW 9.41.300, and are consistent with this chapter. Such local
ordinances shall have the same penalty as provided for by state
law. Local laws and ordinances that are inconsistent with, more
restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state law shall not be
enacted and are preempted and repealed, regardless of the nature of
the code, charter, or home rule status of such city, town, county, or
municipality. ; and
WHEREAS, these ordinances were not found to violate the 2nd Amendment of the
United States Constitution, only the Washington Constitution, and only on the grounds that
RCW 9.41.290 preempts the entire field of firearms regulation;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Repealer. Chapter 5.26 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Storage of
Firearms," and Ordinances 4120, 4121, and 4131 are hereby repealed. Chapter 5.24 of the
Edmonds City Code shall read as it did prior to the passage of Ordinance 4121.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an administrative function of the city
council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
Packet Pg. 440
9.8.g
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED :
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
Im
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 441
9.8.g
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 5.26 OF THE
EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO SAFE GUN
STORAGE AS WELL AS ORDINANCES 4120, 4121,
AND 4131.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2022.
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
2
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 442