The URL can be used to link to this page

2022-08-02 City Council - Full Agenda-3235Op E D o Agenda Edmonds City Council tnl. }nyo REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 AUGUST 2, 2022, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. 6. RECEIVED FOR FILING Edmonds City Council Agenda August 2, 2022 Page 1 1. Claim for Damages from Taylor Sporleder & Yohanes Darmawan (0 min) 2. Written Public Comments (0 min) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 26, 2022 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 26, 2022 3. Approval of claim checks and wire payments. 4. Police Officer Lateral Hiring Inventive MOU 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Set Public Hearing for Street Vacation (10 min) 2. Council "Roles" Statement (20 min) 3. Public Information Officer Job Description Revision (20 min) 4. CIP-CFP Public Works and CIP-CFP Parks (75 min) 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda August 2, 2022 Page 2 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Claim for Damages from Taylor Sporleder & Yohanes Darmawan Staff Lead: NA Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Taylor Sporleder & Yohanes Darmawan Narrative Taylor Sporleder 92nd Ave W (TBD) Yohanes Darmawan 20805 72nd Ave W (TBD) Attachments: Claim for Damages - Yohanes Darmawan - for council Claim for Damages - Taylor Sporleder - for council Packet Pg. 3 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Pleasg,take note tha""U f,Nz-S 0 m tow ft14�) who currently resides at , mailing address _ 2 Date Claim Forme Received by City home phone 4 .4rk phone # and who resided at Z NIfl- a_t the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is _ is claiming damages d � against L OM (ji O& TOLL � Wnkhe sum of $ - 1 o kk -�1� arising out of the following circumstances listed below. 4 0 �� 7� i E DATE OF OCCURRENCE: wr"o�j T � � ZO �� TIME: p:, P►''� p LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: L o�S�� N9 t j i Orl)01-40S wn clW< 6' E DESCRIPTION: 'R V 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about th Y njury oNdamage. Also describe the injury or damage. — i _ VtO )(IfP cA zrooti CI L It ry 1 ft-A-0 �. • 1��' G� (attach an extra sheet for additional information if needgd} 3 . PLIAS L.i7v"_ .�� 210,` 5 — IOiI E 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if a plicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. c`a z 0 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 0 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No c�a E 0 If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: 0 * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: E U Form Revised 04/09/2021 P Packet Pg. 4 2 2 This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare nder penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Sign f Claimant Date and place (residential address, city and county) Or Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) E U Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 04/09/2021 Pan 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 5 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that who currently resides at mailing address home phone # _ work phone # and who resided at n 40� t1he time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is , is claiming damages against [ IA'" 4 _ in the sum of $ arising out of the following circumstances listed below. y m DATE OF OCCURRENCE: "T ' Z.Z TIME: -I '00 f M _ E LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: Zn EAnknn4 WA- 0 DESCRIPTION: E M 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that br ught about the jury or ama e. Also describe -Me- injury or damage. V k In i s )Wurn iYlu '&uk- %m 011& CiZM A vP_ O tS� Pot-1-- l y `Q cblryS 6—arf , ,_, (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. o Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: Yes No * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 6 292 ? V..., This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney -from the Claimant; by -the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Si na a of Claimant Date and place (residential address, city and county) Or Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5tn Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. E M U Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 7 6.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Written Public Comments Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of written public comments. Narrative Public comments submitted to the web form for public comments <https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment> between July 14, 2022 and July 27, 2022. Attachments: 202200802 written public comments Packet Pg. 8 6.2.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 8/02/2022 Submitted on: 7/26/2022 5:15:25 PM Name: Michael Donahue City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Picnic Point Road Comments: Good afternoon, I first want to say, I love Picnic Point Park and all that it offers to us Edmonds residents. But every time I try to get there (not by car), it is extremely dangerous. There is only a two-way road leading to the beach and no space for bikers or walkers to safely get there. For some long stretches, you can't even get off the road to avoid a car because there isn't any space to move to the side. And the road is not straight; often having windy turns where you can't see ahead of you. Could we please work with Snohomish county and create a public works project to install more space along the side of Picnic Point road for both bikers and walkers to use? It doesn't have to have a lot of bells and whistles, just some signs and a good amount of space. There certainly isn't any lack of space to build it off the side of the road. Thank you for considering my proposal. I hope it gets built before a tragedy occurs. Derek Packet Pg. 9 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 26, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E072622 Special Packet Pg. 10 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Council President Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember Mike Nelson, Mayor ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT none 1. CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES July 26, 2022 STAFF PRESENT Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office Jeff Taraday, City Attorney At 6:15 p.m., the Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. CLOSED SESSION a The Council then convened in the Police Training Room in closed session to discuss collective bargaining E strategy per RCW 42.30.140(4)(a). a 3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION N to At 6:58 p.m. the Council reconvened in open session. N 0 w ADJOURN c a) At 6:58 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. z Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 11 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 26, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E072622 Packet Pg. 12 7.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES July 26, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Michelle Bennett, Police Chief Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director Rob English, Acting Public Works Director Leif Bjorback, Building Official Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Council President Olson read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the a original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip a Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. Wecm N respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection W with the land and water." c w 3. ROLL CALL c m E City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 4. PRESENTATIONS Q 1. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin provided an overview of 2021/2022 development services activities which covers building and planning as well as the engineering division in public works: COVID Response o Electronic permitting activities o MyBuildingPermit.com is the online portal for managing permit applications o Pre -application meetings continue over Zoom o Customer feedback on electronic processes is positive City Hall Reopening o City hall reopened to the public in March ■ Hours: loam — 2pm Monday -Friday Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 13 7.2.a o Majority of staff are utilizing hybrid work model o Customer assistance is provided in- person, virtual, or over phone and/or email Customer Survey o Surveyed 29 users of the online permitting system in February 2022. ■ -90% of respondents stated they were satisfied with the online permit process and overall customer service ■ Most respondents (53%) stated they did not require in -person service ■ Zoom meetings remain a popular, time -efficient option In -person service o Effort to be most efficient with staff time while providing in -person customer service. o Staff has been tracking demand since reopening: ■ Average 2.6 customers/day ■ Average visit of 13 minutes ■ Less than 10% of visits require follow up ■ Demand by Division - 46% Planning - 37% Building - 17% Engineering Permit Activity o Reasons for Getting a Permit ■ Helps protect property value ■ Makes selling property easier ■ Reduces liability ■ Improves safety ■ It's required o Permit Activity History $2,000,000 T......................................................................................................................................................................................................r 2,000 U0 $i,800,000 $t,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $i,000,000 $800,000 $600.000 $40D,000 $206,000 $0 ago am0 ago ago arn0 m a a W �rn rn rn rn o 0 00 00000 r as rn o .i N m a in �n r w rn o .y rn o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Total Devel Svc Revenue —# Building Permits Building Permits Issued by Type New Single Family 32 33 $13,220,676 $13,129,167 Duplex 0=11(2 Units) $388,462 Apartment/Condo 2 (202 units) 9 (44 Units) $27 298 995 $8 461,547 Commercial ' 3 ' 0 $2 456 999 $0 Mixed Use (Office/condo) 0 0 $0 Additions/ Alterations Single Family 148 150 $8,678,810 $10,598,819 Apartment/ Gordo 18 36 $754,563 $2 171,982 Commercial 42 52 $6,124,564 $5,457,568 Other Mechanical/Plumbing 470/333 652/400 Demolition 21 12 Miscellaneous 256 287 $1,948,609 $1,157,270 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 14 7.2.a o Enaineerine Permits Issued .0 2018 2019 2020 2021 Permits Issued 460 447 391 444 Permit Revenue $58,221 $41,595 $55,433 $87081 Inspection & Review Revenue $249,427 $223,678 $248,499 $121,935 Impact Fees + General Facilities Charges ■ Transportation Impact Fees $292,730 ■ Parks Impact Fees $134,282 ■ Water GFC $274,541 ■ Sewer GFC $128,373 ■ Storm GFC $51,149 Solar Permits Year # of Permits 2012 3 2013 6 2014 39 2015 32 2016 17 2017 14 2018 14 2019 12 2020 11 2021 22 Totals 170 o Inspections Average/workingAverage/working day 4,831 Building 3,419 Engineering 23.9 2019 235 Planning & Fire 17.4 2020 8,485 Total Inspections in 2021 19.2 2021 Building Inspector Leif Bjorback reviewed KEY PROJECT MA�`�m" ` —Field B0 St ApM WWTP GBH Holdings — PUr[Othce BuildingRecovery ``..•Pine Park -am L � Issued APplled Design Review �$ Pre-App Rezone 4 �I iIl�� ((L, PRD 41 wesrgm _, _ Ralion Brassrar� ant activity: ZI� Greenhill ' Glacier ownhomes EnvVr—nta* Ford Hunber,t F.I Tawn wmes logy An 5 rLMng Sa W.T � tlEii�: s GRE SuntleU Hope Apalln Aprs. Townhomcs* �°-� > Edmonds ,y'"`� Terrace 'Townhomes Edmonds place Crossing Apt, • Projects o Wastewater Treatment Plant Carbon Recovery — 200 — 2"a Ave S ■ Permit Issued, under construction o GRE Apartments - 23400 Highway 99 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 15 7.2.a ■ 192 New Residential Units ■ Permit issued 2020, under construction and nearing completion ■ MFTE Application: 20 moderate income and 20 low income o Anthology of Edmonds — 21200 — 72" d Ave W ■ Permit issued March 2022 ■ 128 new senior living units o Bell Street Apartments — 650 Bell St ■ Permit issued 2019 ■ 4 new residential units o Main Street Commons — 550/558 Main St ■ Permit issued ■ Retail, restaurant and event space o Edmonds Crossing — 23830 Edmonds Way ■ Permit issued 2021 ■ 10 new residential units o Kisan Townhomes — 22810 Edmonds Way ■ Permit issued ■ 18 new residential units o Ford Hunter Townhomes — 7528 — 215th St SW ■ Final occupancy issued ■ 4 unit twnhomes o Paradise Height (condos) — 550 Paradise Lane ■ Permit issued ■ 12 new residential units o Edmonds Townhomes — 8029 — 238" St SW ■ Permit issued ■ 4 unit townhome o Civic Field ■ Permit issued ■ Laying sod next month, delivery of restroom building in September, completion mid- a winter N o Apollo Apartments — 23601 Highway 99 ccoo ■ Applied for Permit c ■ 252 new residential units w ■ MFTE Application: 25 moderate -income and 26 low income o Port Office Building — 471 Admiral Way E ■ Applied for permit ■ Port Administrative offices + other tenants (6,650 sq ft new commercial) o Westgate Station — 9601 Edmonds Way a ■ Applied for permit ■ 4,700 sq ft commercial + 20 residential units o Pine Park — 614/616 5t1i Ave S ■ Applied for permit ■ 6 live/work + 8 unit townhome o Sunde Townhomes — 8629 238th St SW ■ Design Review ■ 5 unit townhome o Greenhill Townhomes — 7103 2101h St SW ■ Design review ■ 6 unit townhome o GBH Holdings — 627 Dayton St Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 16 7.2.a ■ Design Review ■ 24 unit townhome o Housing Hope — 8215 — 236th St SW ■ Design Review ■ 52 new residential units + services ■ On -site programs include household management, finance, parenting, and health o Glacier Environmental — 7509 212th St SW ■ Design Review ■ New commercial office + warehouse o Terrace Place Apartments — 23625 — 84' Ave W ■ Pre-app ■ 260 new residential units o Brass Tack Investments — 9516 Edmonds Way ■ Rezone and lot line adjustment ■ 7 new residential units o Edmonds Way PRD — 5401550 Edmonds Way ■ Pre-app ■ 16-lot planned residential development Ms. McLaughlin reviewed: • Comp Plan Performance Measures o Annually report on: ■ City-wide and city government energy use ■ Number of residential units permitted ■ Average number of jobs within the city ■ Lineal feet of water, sewer, and stormwater mains replaced or rehabilitated ■ Review capital facilities plan project delivery results ■ Lineal feet of sidewalk renovated or rehabilitated • City-wide energy use electricity o Commercial Consumption up 14% YOY o Residential consumption up 23% YOY CITY-WIDE 250 0 m 200 150 N rn $ o m y m 3 � U 100 50 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 ■Commercial ■Residential City government energy use, electricity o City government consumption down 9% YOY CITY OWNED PROPERTIES 9 s 7 6 � 5 4 3 2 0 loll 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 .Ue r,l Utility Street Lighting 4 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 17 Number of Residential Units Permitted o Target: 112 units/year o Average: 88 units/year Housina Type Year SF Multi Duplex ADU Demo Net 2021 33 44 1 4 12 70 2020 32 202 -- 6 20 220 2109 26 26 2 7 (16) 45 2108 57 4 4 9 24 60 2107 60 120 4 7 234 168 2016 41 197 -- 4 16 126 2015 53 4 -- 5 11 51 2014 36 43 14 6 (19 90 2013 36 -- -- 5 10 22 2012 27 -- -- -- 8 19 2011 15 89 -- 5 6 103 Total 426 629 25 58 174 964 • Average number of jobs added o Target: 95 jobs/year o Avera e: 220 jobs/year Year Covered Employment 2021 Not yet released 2020 13,084 2109 12,738 2108 12,480 2107 12,717 2016 10,883 2015 10,677 2014 11,542 2013 12,721 2012 11,952 2011 10,880 • Lineal feet of water, sewer and stormwater mains replaced or rehabilitated Year Water Sewer Storm 2021 Replaced 4,715 327 1,569 Rehabilitated -- 3,546 -- 2022 Replaced 7,016 2,369 4,361 Rehabilitated -- 1,934 --- • CFP Project Delivery Results Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 18 N N W N 0 w c m E 0 2 Q 7.2.a Civic Playfield Acquisition and/or Development Conceptual compk:te CanmunityPark/AthlebcComplea- DidWoodwayHighSchool Conceptual complete Main St & 9th Ave (interimsolution) Conceptual Complete 76th Ave_ W & 212th St SW intersection improvements Design/ROW Complete 76th Ave_ W & 220th St SW intersection improvements Conceptual Design in program 228th St SW Corridor Safety Improvements Design/ROW Complete Residential Traffic Calming Conceptual ❑ngoingannualprogram Trackside WarningSystem or QuietZone@Dayton and Main St_ Conceptual Complete Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements Design Complete Edmonds Marsh/Shellaharger0rAMilowOr/Da7Flighting/Rest,oratian Study Conceptual Perri nvirleCreekHighFlow Red uctiarl/Management Project Study On-goingcapitalprogram Premior�Lsly added CFP projects that are active Highway 99 Gat.eway/Revitalimtion Stage 2 Conceptual Construction in progress 238 St. SW Wa Ikwayfrom Hwy 99 to S R104 Complete Dayton St. Walkwayfrom 3rd Ave to 91 Ave conceptual Selected Sections Completed El m Way Wa Ikwayfrom 8th Ave to 9th Ave Design in progress New CFP protects added in 2020-2025 CFP W alnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave to 7th Ave Completed in 2020 SR t04 Wa Ikway f rnm HAWK Signa I to Pine SVPi ne St from SR104 to 3rd Ave Project does not have secured fund ing Citywide Bicycle I mprovements I rrProgreWOr doing Downtown Lighting I mprovements Project does not have secured fund ing W aterfront Re -development Completed in 2020 Now CFP projects added in 20212026 CFP S R-144.4da ptive System Design to begi n in 2022 236th St. SW Walkwayfrom Hwy 99 to 76th Ave Projectdoes not have secured fund ing New CFP protects added in 2022-2027 UP Lower Perri n vi I le Creek Restoration Preli mina ry Design tD begin in 2022 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 i244th St- 238th St) Design to begin in 2022 Hwy 99 RevitalizatronStage 4 (220th St- 224th St) Design to begin in 2022 • Lineal Feet of Sidewalk renovated or rehabilitated Year Lineal Feet 2021 Contractors Will be added soon Public Works Private Developers 2020 Contractors 1,170' Public Works 300' Private Developers 3,459 Councilmember Paine asked how the City could encourage developments that utilize MFTE to also provide commercial on those properties. The two large projects that have utilized MFTE are great for adding housing options, but they do not add anything else for the community. She recognized taxes would need to be paid on the part of the building that was commercial. Ms. McLaughlin said reasons developers may not provide commercial include, 1) it is not exempt from taxes, 2) it is not required by the zoning, and 3) the parking requirements for residential. Tools to encourage commercial could include reducing the parking, providing an incentive or requiring ground floor commercial. Councilmember Paine recalled the GRE development has private gym space for residents. She was troubled that the MFTE waived all the property taxes including school taxes; developments often include children and the schools need those revenues. Ms. McLaughlin said that may be worth a presentation. Councilmember Tibbott commented it was great to see pictures of the new developments. He asked how many residential units would be added via the buildings that are permitted and/or in process. Ms. McLaughlin answered it is difficult to say how many of the ones in process will be completed. The best numbers to use are the ones that were permitted in 2021 which yields about 290 units in the past 2 years. Councilmember Tibbott said the trend shows a lot of residential units have been added in places that will make a difference. He was impressed by the number of townhomes which are considered missing middle Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 19 N N W N 0 w c m Q 7.2.a and although he assumed they would be quite expensive, townhomes are a housing option the City has not had much of in the past. He will be interested in transition zones where more of that could occur. Council President Olson commented this is always one of her favorite presentations. Sometimes it may feel like there is an anti -development sentiment, but it is exciting to see good development. She expressed her thanks to the department and the planning board as well as developers who develop quality projects, commenting she and the residents appreciate that and hope to see more of it. Her only complaint about the presentation was the use of the word "most" to describe 53% in the customer survey who were satisfied with not having in person service; 53% is not most, it is more than half. Council President Olson asked if the 2021 solar projects included solar projects on City facilities. Mr. Bjorback answered it would include any City projects that required permits, but well over half are residential. Council President Olson recalled recreation and green space and other amenities for residents in high density areas had come up in the context of PROS Plan as well as being proactive with the police department such as having neighborhood crime watches to make buildings safe and that being a renting/selling feature. She was excited to hear that the GRE development has residential gym space in the building. Councilmember Buckshnis said this was also her favorite presentation. She asked about "miscellaneous" in the table of building permits issued by type (256 in 2020) and asked if that represented tree permits. Mr. Bjorback answered those are building permits that do not fall into a major category like plumbing, mechanical, etc. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if any permitting and tracking was being done for trees. Ms. McLaughlin answered that is part of the planning division's review for zoning code compliance and any fees incurred would be paid at that time. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the tree permits were being tracked. Ms. McLaughlin assured they were. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she hears a lot a chain saws in her neighborhood. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if a code writer had been hired. Ms. McLaughlin answered there was a c reorganization within the division that included promotions and an employee's time has been reallocated a to the code rewrite. Recruitment did not result in a viable candidate for the code rewrite. Councilmember a Buckshnis asked if the person would do that full-time. Ms. McLaughlin answered it would not be full -cm N time. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the council approved a full-time code writer and many W believe code writing is very important. Mayor Nelson cautioned that topic is not on the agenda. Ms. c McLaughlin advised that employee deals with code amendments, code rewrite, etc. w c Councilmember Buckshnis said she added together all the numbers for new development and it was about E 916. In response to Councilmember Paine's question, two years were spent on Highway 99 master planning including GRE and no commercial was required due to the MFTE. She noted of all the units being constructed, only 10% are affordable or low income which does not address the issue of a affordability. However, the two developments utilizing MFTE are large apartment complexes and will provide a number of affordable units. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Edmonds Way PRD and asked if it was the property that had 1- 2 houses with a large number of trees. Mr. Bjorback said Mike Clugston, the planner on that project, could provide the history. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there were problems with ingress/egress for that many houses on Edmonds Way. Mr. Bjorback said this is a very preliminary design that has not been approved and will likely be different than the site plan in the presentation. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she was exciting to see all these units being built and she hoped the sewer could handle it. Councilmember Chen said he was happy to see so many multifamily residential building permits approved and in the works. He asked how building permit applications make it to council review, for Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 20 7.2.a example the application for the building proposed at 6t' & Main. Of all these projects, he did not recall any of them, other than 6t1i & Main, coming to the council for review and that project is not included in this presentation. Ms. McLaughlin answered the council's roles in private development is largely related to developing policies that guide the zoning code, code amendments, etc. There are a few instances in which private development comes to council such as rezoning. Only a select few projects are reviewed by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) as smaller projects do not require design review and only go through the building permit process. The council saw the 6' & Main project due to the moratorium and the subsequent zoning amendment and interim design standards. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said some of the choices about who decides land use permit applications are left to each city to decide. In some cities, the legislative body takes on a larger role in land use decision making; those cities tend to get sued more often. It is up to the council to decide how much of a role they want to play in the land use decision making process at the project level. Councilmember Chen observed the council has no knowledge of projects until they are brought to the council's attention. Ms. McLaughlin agreed. Councilmember Chen asked about the criteria used to decide when to bring a project to the council's attention. Ms. McLaughlin answered the process has to be robust enough via staff, council and boards and commissions to yield good projects. The process starts with good code, good policy and how it is applied and interpreted, and the discretion afforded to boards and commissions to shape projects to ensure they are consistent with the policies and codes. As Mr. Taraday mentioned, if council wants a bigger role, that is up to the councils' discretion. It is also important to trust the process to yield good results. When staff sees weaknesses in the code, code amendments can be brought to council such as was done with the — interim design standards for the BD2 zone to ensure the process yields the results everyone expects. Councilmember Chen agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis that the City needs a code writer to 0 improve the process. c Councilmember L. Johnson commented there was a lot in the presentation to be excited about. Although c the survey sample was small, 90% of the respondents stating they were satisfied with the online a permitting process is huge. That allows the City to serve people better via the online permitting which is a easier to do from home, and the fact that 53% did not require in -person service is good information. Ascm N the sample size increases, she suggested taking the poll again to ensure it is moving in the right direction, W but it appears to be a great way for the City to save resources such as staff, paper, fuel, etc. She was c excited to see the all the multifamily projects in the works as those are very much needed. She was also w excited to see the number of jobs added which is over expectations. She found the increased residential energy use concerning and hoped to get more insight into the reason for the increase and separating out E how much is due to growth, increased use of air conditioning, etc. She encouraged staff to work on getting those answers so it possibly could be mitigated. Q Councilmember Paine commented it would be helpful if the permitting system had a mapping feature so users could see locations. She liked that it was online and one -stop and was amazed by the numbers. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described procedures for in -person audience comments. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 21 Kevin Fagerstrom, Edmonds, said he liked Ms. McLaughlin's presentation. Councilmembers appeared to be viewing the presentation on their monitors and he suggested it be displayed on the screen in council chambers so the audience could see it. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, observed the agenda includes a request for the council to approve a new job description for a public records assistant as well as approval of the position. Staff reports the demand placed on the City's public records responders has grown dramatically over the last few years to a pace that staff can no longer keep up with. Before approving this new position, he encouraged the city council to investigate why demand for public records has grown dramatically when the City's population has not grown dramatically. The City's code of ethics states elected officials shall keep the community informed on municipal affairs and encourage communications between the citizens and all municipal officers, emphasize friendly and courteous service to the public and each other, seek to improve the quality of public service and confidence of citizens. The City's general code of conduct states the City's primary function is to provide service to the citizens of Edmonds. To achieve that goal, all employees are expected to treat the public as their most valued customer. All employees are expected to serve the public in a professional manner which is courteous, efficient and helpful. He urged the council to investigate the cause of the dramatic growth in public records requests and report the investigation's findings to the public prior to approving a new public records assistant position. Next, Mr. Reidy said his questions about reimagining the streets have not been answered. For example, if streets are reimagined, who will be responsible to pay for that as well as for the ongoing maintenance. Next, he asked that the City inform the public what will be done about the conflict between Resolution 1381 and Resolution 1498; Resolution 1381 claims we believe the strength and vitality of our community — comes from our rich diversity of cultures, experiences and faiths and we celebrate that diversity; Resolution 1498 does not celebrate that diversity. Finally, he requested the council consider the draft G ordinance he provided to repeal Ordinances 4120, 4121 and 4131, which includes the following c statement, following adoption of this ordinance at the next regular council meeting, all City of Edmonds @ elected officials and the city attorney shall reaffirm their oaths of office. Doing so would benefit everyone c and might improve citizen confidence in Edmonds City government. a a Beth Fleming, Edmonds, referred to the development services presentation, commenting there are manycm N large scale development projects underway, a lot of which are occurring on SR-104. She lives on SR-104 W near the interchange with Highway 99 and there seems to be a lot happening in that area. It is the entry to c the City when people are heading toward downtown as well as home to a lot of people. She requested the w city council consider becoming more involved in the development process due to the number of trees being removed during development. Residents in the bowl have views of Puget Sound, but in the area she E lives in, trees and the environment are the view. She recalled Ms. McLaughlin saying smaller projects were not reviewed by the ADB; the council should consider if there is value in having more projects reviewed by the ADB. That seems appropriate, particularly with the growth that is coming, so "we do not a end up with sort of a big hot mess in our neighborhoods." Mayor Nelson described procedures for virtual audience comments. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, questioned whether the project at 7528 — 215th St SW had parking, and whether the Anthology of Edmonds accepted residents on Medicaid and Medicare, and expressed concern with what she felt was a snarky attitude when Ms. McLaughlin said, "anybody paying attention," noting some people do not speak English or attend council meetings. She noted the project on 215th St SW was already built and questioned how many of the other projects identified as permit issued had already been built. She suggested stopping permits for anything not already started, fearing the area will be overrun with cars. [Difficult to hear Ms. Arthur speaking] Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 22 7.2.a Mayor Nelson declared a recess from 7:59 — 8:09 pm to address technical difficulties. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, said she did not like Ms. McLaughlin's tone. She expressed concern with the removal of trees for development on SR-104. She feared Edmonds would start looking like Seattle. [Difficult to hear Ms. Arthur speaking] 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 19, 2022 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL COMMITTEE MINUTES 3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 19, 2022 4. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 5. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT 6. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM ROBERT BRETZ & CHRISTINA SCHRUM 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS PROCESS FOR FILLING COUNCIL VACANCY - POSITION #1 N Council President Olson explained tonight's agenda item is strictly related to the application process. The N vacancy in council position #1 will be filled with an appointment. The appointment process includes c posting and publicizing an application, reviewing applications, and conducting interviews of the qualified w candidates, and culminates in a nomination/voting process at council to select the appointee. The application in the packet is the application that was used in past. E COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO USE THE APPLICATION IN THE PACKET FOR THE UPCOMING APPLICATION PROCESS. Q Councilmember Paine commented she liked the process that was followed last time and felt it was still appropriate. She did not object to including the questions proposed in the agenda memo. Councilmember Tibbott referred to Question 1, stating he was interested in applicants' volunteer experience in Edmonds. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADD "IN EDMONDS" AT THE END OF QUESTION 1. Council President Olson said she can see the value of hearing about applicants' volunteer experience in Edmonds and anticipated someone would that include in their list of experience, but their other volunteer experience may be relevant as well. She preferred the more general question. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 23 7.2.a Councilmember Tibbott said the candidate is applying for a position in the City of Edmonds and their ability to serve the citizens of Edmonds was very pertinent to him so inclusion of that specificity was important. He hoped applicants would also share their general volunteer experience during the interview process. Councilmember L. Johnson preferred the original language, commenting volunteer experience is volunteer experience. Whether it was at the state level or in another city, the person still gained experience and showed their willingness to give of themselves. Someone with volunteer experience in Edmonds would likely include that on their application. She preferred not to attempt to limit a person's volunteer experience, possibly omitting relevant experience by specifying volunteer experience in Edmonds. Councilmember Paine observed there is a question about volunteer experience on page 184 of the packet. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (1-5); COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Olson offered the following adjustments to the dates in the packet due to receipt of new information • Application will be posted by July 29t' • Application deadline: Wednesday, August 17' • Date of interviews: Saturday, August 27t' • Tentative date for nominations/voting: Week of September 5t'', possibly during the regular meeting on September 6' Council President Olson advised a cover page that provides additional information will accompany the a application. The council's administrative assistant completed it late today so it was not included in the N packet. cm N COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED TO INCLUDE COVER PAGE SIGHT UNSEEN WITH w STRICTLY INFORMATION IN ADDITION TO THE APPLICATION QUESTIONS. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. t Council President Olson asked if that meant the cover page could not accompany the application. Mayor Nelson advised there was a motion to do that and it was not seconded. a Councilmember Paine said she was not certain what would be included in the cover page. For example, she suggested clarifying the Esperance area. Council President Olson asked whether it would be permissible for her to forward an email to councilmembers with that information and add a vote on the cover sheet later on the agenda once councilmembers had a chance to read it. City Attorney Jeff Taraday asked for clarification regarding the process she was proposing. Council President Olson said the cover sheet was not provided to council prior to the meeting; it was simply an instruction sheet with information for the candidate. She asked if that needed to be approved by full council. Mr. Taraday answered this process is sort of ad hoc; there is no City ordinance that states which aspects of the process do or do not have to be approved by full council which makes it difficult to answer. If the council is willing to give the council president the benefit of the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 24 7.2.a doubt on the cover sheet, it becomes a non -issue, but if the council wants to see everything before it goes out, the council has that right. Council President Olson offered to read the cover sheet into the record. Councilmember Chen agreed with Councilmember Paine, the council needs to see the information before approving it. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not understand the complication the council was creating. It is basically a cover sheet and she did not recall the council ever voting on such items in the past. It is important to get the process started and she questioned the need to vote on a cover sheet that provides basic information regarding the timeline. She was comfortable allowing the council president and the council assistant to proceed. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO READ THE COVER SHEET. Mr. Taraday offered to display the cover sheet on the screen. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. Council President Olson read the proposed cover sheet: Information and Instructions City Council Appointment — Council Position #1 Thank you for your interest in serving our community as a member of the Edmonds City Council. The timeline for filling the Council vacancy is as follows: Application Deadline: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 - due by 4:00 p.m. Candidate Interviews: Saturday, August 27, 2022 (or as scheduled) Nomination/ Selection: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 (subject to change) To be considered, your application must be completed and received by the City Council Office at City Hall - 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 no later than 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 17, 2022. Applications received after 4:00 p.m. will not be considered. Additional written information after this date will not be accepted unless requested by City Council. Please submit the following items: Application + Supplemental Questionnaire You may submit a cover letter You may submit a resume Via email: beckie.Peterson (cDedmondswa.gov Via delivery: To 1 st floor reception desk at City Hall Via US Mail: Edmonds City Council Office — 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 25 N N W N O W c as E a 7.2.a Councilmember Eligibility, Vacancy Appointment Term & Public Disclosure • To be eligible for appointment you must be registered to vote within the City; and • You must have been a resident in the City of Edmonds one year immediately preceding the appointment. • If you are appointed to the vacant Position #1 by a majority vote of the City Council, your term will expire after the results of the November 2023 general election have been certified. • Once an application has been submitted to the City, it is a public record available to the public. Citv Council Duties. Reauirements and Compensation • Edmonds City Council has seven part-time council positions; all are non -partisan and at -large (serving the City as a whole as opposed to specific districts). • Councilmembers are required to attend Council and Council Committee meetings (Tuesday evenings) and other meetings as scheduled. • Councilmembers are also expected to serve as liaisons appointed to various regional boards and commissions. • Councilmembers receive $X a month, and are eligible for benefits. • If you are appointed to the vacant position, you will take an Oath of Office and be required to complete Open Public Meeting Act training within 90 days of appointment. For further information please contact: Beckie Peterson, Executive Assistant to Edmonds City Council (425) 771-0248/ beckie.peterson@edmondswa.gov COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO ACCEPT AND USE THE COVER SHEET. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. REPORT ON CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE SEAVIEW PARK INFILTRATION a FACILITY PHASE 2 PROJECT Q N N Acting Public Works Director Rob English explained this project will expand the existing infiltration N facility at Seaview Park to help reduce high flows and velocities in Perrinville Creek. The City received a 40 w grant from Department of Ecology. Bids were opened on June 28, 2022; 10 bids were received. The low .. bid was provided by Northern Contractors at $355,648 and the high bid was just over $643,000. The engineer's estimate was $379,076. The bid documents included a project experience requirement due to E challenges in the past couple years with contractors who provide the low bid but experienced challenges in providing quality construction. The criteria for experience included two projects over a three year Q period. Staff determined Northern Contractors failed to meet that experience. There were also challenges with the formatting of the bid documents to fully verify the other contractors. One of the items in the bid item table did not list a quantity. As a result, staff recommends rejecting all bids, revise the bid documents and readvertise. Plans were to build this project in the fall when the park is at lower usage so the timeline is not an issue. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO REJECT CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE SEAVIEW PARK INFILTRATION FACILITY PHASE 2 PROJECT. Councilmember Chen asked if the rejection creates any financial issue. Mr. English answered no, as there was no contract. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 26 7.2.a MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE 76TH OVERLAY PROJECT Acting Public Works Director Rob English explained the City received a federal grant for this project in 2018. This is a joint project with the City of Lynwood, who owns half the street, to provide a full width grind and pavement overlay between 196" Street and Olympic View Drive. Twelve ADA pedestrian ramps will be rebuilt to be compliant with standards, nine in Edmonds and three in Lynnwood. Edmonds Council took action last fall to add a northbound bike lane on 76' between 196' Street to 1,000 feet south of Olympic View Drive and that pavement striping will be part of the scope of work. Bids were opened bids in mid -July. He reviewed: • Bid results: Contractor bid result Amount Granite Construction $1,981,243 JB Asphalt $2,306,687 Engineer's Estimate $1,569,648 In addition to inflation and the cost of oil and other increases that have occurred over the last several months, the federal grant included a disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) goal requirement of 23% which is established by the state. That is a very high percentage, it is typically 10-12%. It is a mandatory goal; the contractor must meet that percentage of DBE subcontractors. He recognized the importance of the overall program and providing work to those firms, but it presents challenges especially this late in the year for bidding which may be another reason the bids are higher. The delay was due in part to challenges with getting bid documents approved by WSDOT who is having staffing issues in the local program division, the department that reviews bid documents. The colder, wetter spring weather compressed the paving window for paving contractors in the region so it's possible some contractors who may have bid on this project already have a full workload for this summer. Mr. English reviewed: • Construction Budget Item Edmonds Lynnwood Total Contract Award $1,032,988 $948,255 $1,981,234 Construction M mt, inspection and testing $144,620 $132,760 $277,380 Management reserve 10% $103,300 $94,830 $198,139 Total $1,280,908 $1,175,845 $2,456,753 • Construction Funding Funding Edmonds Lynnwood REET Fund 125 $360,000 Federal Grant ($785,100) Street Construction Fund 112- Overlay Program $41,440 REET Fund 125/126 — overlay program $94,368 City ofLynnwood 1 $1,175,845 Total $1,280,908 1 $1,175,845 Approvals o WSDOT concurs with awarding the project o Lynnwood city council approved the award last night Staff recommendation o Award construction contract to Granite construction o Authorize a 10% management reserve of $198,130. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 27 N N W N 0 w c m E 0 2 Q 7.2.a COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO GRANITE CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZE A 10% MANAGEMENT RESERVE OF $198,130. Councilmember Paine asked if WSDOT concurred with the 23% DBE percentage and why such a high percentage was assigned. Mr. English said an explanation does not accompany the goal; the City receives a letter identifying the DBE percentage. There has been some feedback that the state has had difficulty meeting the goal at a statewide level; the state must meet a percentage and assign varying goals to their projects and local program projects. He was unsure if there was a need to increase the DBE goal this year to help meet the overall state goal, but presumed that may be the case. There are not a lot of trades involved in an overlay project and the use of subcontractors is limited. For Councilmember Paine, Mr. English explained the bid documents include the DBE subcontractors that met the goal. WSDOT and the City have verified the contractors are DBE contractors and are in good standing. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. POSITION CONVERSION TO 1.0 FTE FOR DV COORDINATOR POSITION Police Chief Michelle Bennett explained this is a request to increase the 0.5 FTE domestic violence coordinator to 1.0 FTE. This request was discussed at committee two weeks ago and the committee recommend it come to full council. Later on the agenda is a request for a public disclosure specialist position related to bodycam disclosures. c 7 O Administrative Services Director Dave Turley advised there are three similar agenda items, the first is the V domestic violence coordinator. He asked if council wanted the position discussed together. Mayor Nelson O recommended following the agenda. > O L Chief Bennett advised there is sufficient work for a 1.0 FTE domestic violence coordinator as described a in the agenda memo. N N Councilmember Buckshnis recalled this came to the finance committee who recommended it come to full N council as the position is over $100,000 and because the committee wanted citizens to realize the 0 w importance of this position. She used to volunteer for the Portland police teaching self-defense so she was aware a domestic violence coordinator is much different than a social worker. m E COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE A 1.0 FTE FOR THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATOR POSITION. Q Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the narrative that states the City receives an average of 400 domestic violence calls a year and there is more than enough work for the domestic violence advocate to work full-time. If the DV advocate worked 365 days/year, he/she would still not have enough time to manage on average one case/day. She supported having the resources to serve victims of domestic violence. The increased population and effects of COVID may influence the increase and the City needs to be ready to meet the need. Councilmember Paine expressed her total support. She worked in the domestic violence field on the civil side for seven years and relied heavily on the DV advocates in the police departments. She was glad this was getting done and wish staff good luck with hiring. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 28 7.2.a Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for the motion. He asked the advantages of an inhouse domestic violence coordinator versus outsourcing or using south county resources. Chief Bennett answered an outside vendor would not necessarily have access to all the resources or databases. It is also more difficult to supervise a person who is supervised elsewhere. With the amount of cases and call volume, it makes sense to have the person part of the police department and the collaborative effort of people within the police department working toward helping victims of domestic violence and other crimes. Councilmember Chen recalled the finance committee was in full support of this request. He recalled learning about domestic violence calls while attending the police academy; dealing with family members makes it a very complicated issue. He thanked the current 0.5 domestic violence coordinator for their dedication, commenting the position deserved to be recognized and rewarded. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE SPECIALIST POSITION REQUEST Administrative Services Director Dave Turley provided background on the need for the public disclosure specialist in the police department and the public records associate in administrative services, explaining most of the responsibility for fulfilling public disclosure is done by the administrative services, but a lot is also done by the police department. The two are separated because the knowledge and skills need to fulfill public disclosure requests in the police department is very different than administrative services as the rules for redaction are much different as well as the recent addition of body cameras which is a complete new area of public disclosure. The City has one public disclosure officer in the administrative services department who handles all the public disclosure requests for the entire City except those handled by the police department, but the addition of a public records associate is the topic of the next agenda item. Mr. Turley continued, the police department has currently has one approved position in the budget and are c asking for a second position, primarily due to body cameras. He recalled it takes 9-10 hours to analyze n every hour of body camera footage for public disclosure, a huge undertaking. Body cameras are a new a program which is one of the reasons for the additional position. N N W Councilmember Tibbott recalled reading there were cost savings due to not hiring a commissioned 21 officer. Chief Bennett agreed. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the commissioned officer would be in next w year's budget. Chief Bennett answered it was initially planned to have one public disclosure person and one commissioned officer; staff s research found the commissioned officer would be doing what the public disclosure specialist would be doing so it did not make sense to hire a commissioned person. Other needs will be addressed in the upcoming budget. Q Councilmember Tibbott anticipated there could be time savings as staff became familiar with the software and as the software became better at redacting. He envisioned that program would expand and he would hate to see the City hiring 2, 3 or 4 specialists. Chief Bennett said she worried that two would not be enough. It is a good start to see how it goes; she anticipated there could be upward of 56 patrol officers with body cameras. As time goes on, the software will not get better, but the records specialist may get more proficient at reviewing the footage as they get more used to the program. At the same time, the public will get more proficient at understanding body cam footage is available which can increase public disclosure requests. She was hesitant in asking for only two, but felt it was reasonable until the program starts; it may be necessary to ask for more staff later. If these two positions are approved, she hoped to fully roll out the body camera program to all patrol staff by the end of September. Councilmember Tibbott commented Chief Bennett was outlining a fairly significant investment in this program and the possibility it may increase. Chief Bennett explained the budget for body cams was Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 29 7.2.a approved during last year's budget review. The way the laws have been written legislatively, they basically mandate recording of many interactions. It needs to be done for best practices but, the City needs to do it legislatively as it protects officers and the community. It is important for the public to understand this is basically a mandate and not just something the police department chose to do. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the state is offsetting the expense. Chief Bennett answered no. Councilmember L. Johnson asked about the public records associate position, recalling it was mentioned during public comments that the demand placed on the City's public records responders has grown dramatically over the last few years. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, recalling the mayor instructed the council to consider these requests one at a time. Mayor Nelson said he instructed staff, but ruled point taken and requested councilmembers stick to the agenda item under discussion, the police department's public disclosure specialist position. Councilmember Chen asked from a technology standpoint whether backup of the footage was necessary. He asked if there was a central backup that neighboring cities could share, anticipating other cities would be using the same technology due to the state legislation. Chief Bennett answered a lot of other cities are in the process of using body cameras but there are a variety of vendors. The vendor Edmonds chose was Taser Axon; all data is uploaded to the Cloud for purposes of public disclosure and retention. The need for other information technology will be addressed in the next budget year. Councilmember Chen asked if it was better for Edmonds to have its own public disclosure personnel to handle requests. Chief Bennett answered the City must have its own public disclosure staff to handle requests for information; Taser Axon just stores the information which the department accesses and downloads to review and redact in response to requests for public disclosure. Councilmember Paine referred to a statement in the agenda memo regarding daily fines that occur for c failure to comply with public disclosure request timelines, noting that is both for police and regular public a disclosures. She asked if there were statistics regarding how both departments were meeting those a timelines and whether the council will be alerted if staff is not keeping up. Chief Bennett answered thecm N fines can be hefty, there is a public records calendar and process that is very technical. There are W requirements for sending letters, for extensions, for fulfilling requests, etc. and not meeting those c requirements can result in significant fines. Having only one person handling public records for the City w has made it difficult for that person to go on vacation, etc. m E Councilmember Paine expressed her total support for the request and welcomed this discussion because, for many reasons, the number of public disclosure requests is becoming more burdensome. Q COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE 1.0 FTE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE SPECIALIST POSITION REQUEST IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. NEW PUBLIC RECORDS ASSOCIATE POSITION Administrative Services Director Dave Turley explained there is one public records officer, Sue Quan, who handles all the public disclosure requests for the City. A lot of the legal redaction is done by Patricia Taraday at Lighthouse. The City receives different types of public disclosure requests; some are very simple and can be fulfilled quickly such as request for a calendar, minutes for a specific meeting, salaries for the administrative services department, etc. The City also receives requests for a bank of emails; Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 30 7.2.a requests for the emails of a councilmember, the attorney, HR, etc. take a lot of time to review and ensure HIPPA, legal, personnel, etc. information is redacted. Mr. Turley explained this agenda item is a request for a public records assistant which will be two pay ranges below the public records officer. This person could fulfill a lot of the easier requests and the public records officer would concentrate on the high volume requests that take more analysis and are more technical to redact. The lower pay grade allows an opportunity for advancement in the future. Public records requests have increased, sometimes requests ask for thousands of emails, creating a workload backlog of 9-10 years. The three requests are in one ordinance, the domestic violence coordinator, the public disclosure specialist and the public records associate. Councilmember Paine expressed her total support. She pointed out the job description is for a public records associate, but the presentation and narrative refers to a public records assistant. Mr. Turley advised the job description in the packet will rule; he may have referred to an assistant when describing that it would be a slightly lower level than the public records officer. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PUBLIC RECORDS ASSOCIATION POSITION SO CAN BE FILLED IMMEDIATELY AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE SPECIALIST IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATOR AND THE AND PARKING ENFORCEMENT AS WRITTEN IN THE ORDINANCE. Councilmember L. Johnson commented on the demand placed on the City's public records responders, Z recalling a request during public comment to investigate that demand. She asked if the requests for c thousands of emails that take 9-10 years to review come from many individuals or only a few. She was c not suggesting staff investigate that as she understood the City had to respond to public records requests. V She is in favor of this position, but before the council approves it, she wanted to understand the reason for G the dramatic increase. Mr. Turley answered public disclosure requests follow other things that occur in > the City. For example, a large number of people make comment at council meetings, but there are some n people who comment regularly. There is also the 80/20 rule, for example in sales, 80% of the sales are a made by 20% of the salespeople. The City will receive a 100 requests for simple things that take 3-4 days to fulfill and then 5 requests that take a year each. Councilmember L. Johnson observed the requests that N create the backlog are from a few and the rules that require the City to respond necessitate additional N expense and an additional position to meet the requirement. w Councilmember Tibbott relayed he has heard other cities put all emails on their website. For example, Redmond has something where citizens register as users of the website and then all the emails are E available for review. He assumed there was a way to screen for HIPPA and other information. That seems like one possible way for citizens who are interested in doing their own research. Mr. Turley said the a difficulty with that is every single email would need to be screened to look for information to be redacted in almost real time instead of only examining emails that are requested through public disclosure. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said the question raises an interesting issue regarding how automation could facilitate some of the disclosure opportunities, but he did not have enough information about the software's capabilities. He was skeptical the software would be powerful enough to recognize information that needed to be redacted. For example, would the software be sophisticated enough to pull a Lighthouse email in a PFD form that was forwarded by a staff member? While it would be interesting and some citizens may appreciate having that much information at their fingertips, he did not think it would obviate the City's legal obligation to comply with the Public Record Act (PRA). For example, if someone wants a stack of emails, they can ask for it and the City still has to respond. For example, the City's ordinances are all on line; if someone files a public records request for a specific ordinance, the City cannot refer them to the website. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 31 7.2.a Councilmember Tibbott said it would be worth exploring. The state has been reviewing record request laws and how they apply in cities. Mr. Turley said another reason public disclosure requests have increased so dramatically is people use it essentially as a harassment tool. For example, if a councilmember or a staff person uses their personal email and sends a document to a citizen and the citizen knows about it, they will do a public disclosure request asking for that information. If it was send via personal email, the City's system does not know about it, but even though it was sent from a personal account, it is still a public record. When a person asks for the record and the City doesn't provide it because it doesn't know it exists, the City is sued for significant amounts of money. Council President Olson reminded there is a main motion to pass the ordinance which can be found on packet page 208. To the question of why there are so many public records requests, she noted there is a definitely a correlation between communication and public trust; as public trust goes up, there will be fewer public records requests. It is a great goal for everyone to bring down the number of public records requests via communicating and answering questions. It costs money to process public records requests which is one of the reasons the committee brought this item to council. People need to know when they ask for things, especially huge requests that are fishing rather than an actual concern about an actual matter, it is expensive and may require even more staff. She asked citizens to be conservative and to use public records requests as needed and not as a game. Councilmember Buckshnis read the ordinance title, An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, amending the budgeted full time equivalent positions as originally adopted through the 2022 budget by adding certain new positions with corresponding salary ranges. She observed the number of positions was increasing but there were sufficient funds in the budget so a budget amendment was not required at this time. Mr. Turley said for example the position he is requesting, if it was filled quickly, it would only be funded for three months at a cost of approximately $25,000. The funds are available due to salary savings but the positions need to be approved by council in order to fill them. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has been around long enough to remember the City of Gold Bar went a bankrupt due to public record requests. In the 12 years she has been on council, she has never as many N cm public records requests as she has in the last two years. Many of the requests are for things like all the W emails regarding the PROS Plan, just blanket fishing expeditions that create extra work for the City. c Some requests even come from councilmembers. Public records requests are always a one-sided story. w She recalled even the late Councilmember K. Johnson would call her and say she had a public records request. It is important for the public to regain their trust and it is unfortunate people don't understand the E council is trying to do their job which is to move the City forward. She was supportive of these positions and hoped eventually there would be fewer public records requests. She referred to information from an executive session where her name was not redacted. She offered to share with Mr. Reidy all the public a records requests that had been received for her in the past two years. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT (OPMA) TRAINING (PART 2) City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained did Part 1 of training in February. He reviewed Part 2: • What if action is taken at a closed meeting? o Any action taken at meetings failing to comply with the provisions of this subsection shall be null and void. RCW 42.30.060 • Voting Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 32 7.2.a o No governing body of a public agency at any meeting required to be open to the public shall vote by secret ballot. RCW 42.30.060 • Location o "...meetings of the governing body need not be held within the boundaries of the territory over which the public agency exercises jurisdiction." RCW 42.30.070 • Special meeting notice o "shall specify the time and place of the special meeting and the business to be transacted. Final disposition shall not be taken on any other matter at such meetings by the governing body." RCW 42.30.080 • Final disposition = final action? o "Final action" means a collective positive or negative decision, or an actual vote by a majority of the members of a governing body when sitting as a body or entity, upon a motion, proposal, resolution, order, or ordinance. RCW 42.30.080 • Adjournments o The governing body of a public agency may adjourn any regular, adjourned regular, special, or adjourned special meeting to a time and place specified in the order of adjournment. Less than a quorum may so adjourn from time to time. RCW 42.30.090 • Executive Sessions o Nothing contained in this chapter may be construed to prevent a governing body from holding an executive session during a regular or special meeting: RCW 42.30.110 • Executive Sessions — real estate acquisition o (b) To consider the selection of a site or the acquisition of real estate by lease or purchase when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased price; RCW 42.30.110 • Executive Sessions — real estate disposition o (c) To consider the minimum price at which real estate will be offered for sale or lease when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of decreased price. However, final action selling or leasing public property shall be taken in a meeting open to the public; RCW 42.30.110 • Executive Sessions — complaints o (f) To receive and evaluate complaints or charges brought against a public officer or N employee. However, upon the request of such officer or employee, a public hearing or a 04 meeting open to the public shall be conducted upon such complaint or charge; RCW w 42.30.110 • Executive Sessions — employee qualifications o (g) To evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for public employment or to review the performance of a public employee. RCW 42.30.110 • Executive Sessions — officer qualifications a o (h) To evaluate the qualifications of a candidate for appointment to elective office. However, any interview of such candidate and final action appointing a candidate to elective office shall be in a meeting open to the public; RCW 42.30.110 • Executive Sessions — attorney/client o To discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating to agency enforcement actions, or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or potential litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency. RCW 42.30.110 • "Potential litigation" means: o Litigation that has been specifically threatened to which the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party; Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 33 7.2.a o Litigation that the agency reasonably believes may be commenced by or against the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity; or o Litigation or legal risks of a proposed action or current practice that the agency has identified when public discussion of the litigation or legal risks is likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency; Executive session -- process o Before convening in executive session, the presiding officer of a governing body shall publicly announce the purpose for excluding the public from the meeting place, and the time when the executive session will be concluded. The executive session may be extended to a stated later time by announcement of the presiding officer. RCW 42.30.110(2) Other exceptions to OPMA o "... this chapter shall not apply to: (2) That portion of a meeting of a quasi-judicial body which relates to a quasi-judicial matter between named parties as distinguished from a matter having general effect on the public or on a class or group; or o (4)(b) that portion of a meeting during which the governing body is planning or adopting the strategy or position to be taken by the governing body during the course of any collective bargaining, professional negotiations, or grievance or mediation proceedings, or reviewing the proposals made in the negotiations or proceedings while in progress. RCW 42.30.140 Violations o (1)Each member of the governing body who attends a meeting of such governing body where action is taken in violation of any provision of this chapter applicable to him or her, with knowledge of the fact that the meeting is in violation thereof, shall be subject to personal liability in the form of a civil penalty in the amount of one thousand dollars. RCW 42.30.120 o Other possible consequences? ■ Action rendered null and void ■ Attorney's fees paid by city ■ Recall 2022 Legislation o o ESHB 1329 — Sec. 2 amends 42.30.010 a The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The a people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is N good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on N remaining informed and informing the people's public servants of their views so that they c may retain control over the instruments they have created. For these reasons, even when not w required b, law, agencies are encouraged to incorporate and accept public comment m during their decision -making process. E o ESHB 1329 — Sec. 3 amends 42.30.030 (2) Public agencies are encouraged to provide for the increased ability of the public to a observe and participate in the meetings of governing bodies through real-time telephonic, electronic, internet, or other readily available means of remote access that do not require an additional cost to access the meeting. o ESHB 1329 — Sec. 5(1) New section to address declared emergencies like COVID-19: Reasonable safety standard OPTIONS Remote only; no physical location In person meeting but without some or all of the public o ESHB 1329 — Sec. 5(2) Requirements for remote meetings: Real-time verbal communication by members Requirements for remote / limited attendance meetings: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 34 7.2.a Public listening by free readily available means o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 5(3) No action without public listening except executive sessions. o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 5(4) Notice must include instructions on how the public may listen live to proceedings and on how the public may access any other electronic means of remote access offered by the public agency. o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 5(5) Nothing in this section alters the ability of public agencies ... to have members of a governing body participate in a meeting remotely with no declared emergency. o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 6 amends 42.30.040 A member of the public shall not be required, as a condition to attendance at a meeting of a governing body, to register his or her name and other information, to complete a questionnaire, or otherwise to fulfill any condition precedent to his or her attendance. This section does not prohibit any generally applicable conditions determined by the governing body to be reasonably necessary to protect the public health or safe , , or to protect a ag inst interruption of the meeting, including a meeting at which the physical attendance by some or all members of the public is limited due to a declared emergency. o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 7 amends 42.30.050 ■ Adds: - Nothing in this section prohibits the governing body from stopping people from speaking to the governing body when not recognized by the governing body to speak. o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 8 amends 42.30.070 — If, by reason of fire, flood, earthquake, or other emergency, there is a need for expedited action by a governing body to meet the emergency, the presiding officer of the governing G body may provide for a meeting site other than the regular meeting site, for a remote meeting c without a physical location, or for a meeting at which the physical attendance by some or all cc members of the public is limited due to a declared emergency, and the notice requirements of c this chapter shall be suspended during such emergency. a o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 10(4) amends 42.30.070 Q (4) The notices provided in this section may be dispensed with in the event a special meetingcm N is called to deal with an emergency involving injury or damage to persons or property or the W likelihood of such injury or damage, when time requirements of such notice would make c notice impractical and increase the likelihood of such injury or damage, or when the required w notice cannot be posted or displayed with reasonable safety, including but not limited to declared emergencies in which travel to physically -post notice is barred or advised against. o ESHB 1329 - Sec. I I amends 42.30.090 ((Wheneve Except in the case of remote meetings without a physical location as provided for in this chapter, whenever any meeting is adjourned a copy of the order or notice of a adjournment shall be conspicuously posted immediately after the time of the adjournment on or near the door of the place where the regular, adjourned regular, special, or adjourned special meeting was held o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 13(l) NEW (1) Except in an emergency situation, the governing body of a public agency shall provide an opportunity at or before every regular meeting at which final action is taken for public comment. The public comment required under this section may be taken orally at a public meeting, or by providing an opportunity for written testimony to be submitted before or at the meeting. If the governing body accepts written testimony, this testimony must be distributed to the governing body. The governing body may set a reasonable deadline for the submission of written testimony before the meeting. o ESHB 1329 - Sec. 13(2) NEW Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 23 Packet Pg. 35 7.2.a (2) Upon the request of any individual who will have difficulty attending a meeting of the governing body of a public agency by reason of disability, limited mobility, or for any other reason that makes physical attendance at a meeting difficult, the governing body shall, when feasible, provide an opportunity for that individual to provide oral comment at the meeting remotely if oral comment from other members of the public will be accepted at the meeting. Councilmember Buckshnis asked what recourse a citizen has, other than suing the City, which is costly, if they believe the City violated the OPMA, such as not allowing them to speak during public comments. Mr. Taraday responded he and all elected officials are doing their best to comply with the OPMA but are not perfect and there may be times like the last lawsuit that was dismissed where the City it admitted it had violated the OPMA with its first Zoom executive session because they didn't do it exactly right. Things like that will happen. If citizens are concerned the City is not doing something not in compliance with the OPMA, they can bring it to the City's attention and it will certainly be reviewed to see if a change needs to be made. Councilmember Buckshnis commented it was an isolated incident last year regarding the adjourned meeting and public comment where many citizens believe their rights were violated. Some of the citizens went to the AG, but the AG does not look at things like that. She asked if the only recourse was to sue the City. Mr. Taraday answered it depends on what a person is are looking for. A judge will invalidate action taken in violation of the OPMA. If that is the relief they are seeking, yes, they should sue. If they want the City to change a practice, policy, or technology, the most efficient thing to do is to inform the people in charge of that and see if they can address the concern. Councilmember Buckshnis asked what a citizen can do when the veil of an executive session is pierced or something is disclosed in the public that should not have been or an email is disclosed that has not been redacted. Mr. Taraday said that was more of a that public records question than an OPMA question and suggested tabling that for another training. Where it may become a OPMA issue is an executive session is held for a reason, the information is confidential. It is official misconduct to leak material from an executive session to someone who is not entitled to that confidential information. If that happened, that official misconduct should probably be reported to the City so something can be done about the official misconduct. If documents were accidentally disclosed, that is more of a public records issue. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND 10:15. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER CHEN VOTING NO. 9. GUN STORAGE AND RELATED LAWS AFTER WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT'S FIELD PREEMPTION RULING City Attorney Jeff Taraday advised the packet contains an ordinance that would repeal Chapter 5.26 of the Edmonds City Code, the code that was adopted by Ordinance 4120 requiring safe gun storage. That ordinance was recently found to be unconstitutional under the state constitution on the grounds of preemption because there is a state statute that preempts the entire field of firearms regulation so the city is not allowed to regulate firearms in any way. He recommended the ordinance in the packet or some version of it be adopted by the council so the City would be in compliance with the court order that essentially requires this repeal. Mr. Taraday noted Ordinance 4121 was not the subject of the lawsuit and therefore not the subject of the injunction. So while the council is not under court order to repeal Ordinance 4121, it refers to the ordinance that is being repealed, and from a housekeeping standpoint, it should also be repealed to avoid the code pointing to a chapter that no longer exists. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 24 Packet Pg. 36 N N W N 0 w c m E t 0 2 Q COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO PASS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 5.26 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO SAFE GUN STORAGE AS WELL AS ORDINANCES 4120, 4121, AND 4131. Council President Olson said she would like the council to move forward with this tonight. She will offer an amendment to the ordinance. Councilmember L. Johnson found it disappointing that a city is prohibited from requiring safe storage of firearms which is something that would no doubt save lives. She did not disagree with the need to repeal this ordinance given the ruling from the State Supreme Court, but wished that the council as a body was doing more, and not coming here empty handed. She and Councilmember Paine are working on expanding education and outreach and the administration has been doing quite a bit of work as well. She hoped other councilmembers would join her and Councilmember Paine's efforts because there is no doubt safe storage does save lives. The more education and awareness that can be raised around this issue, the more lives that can be impacted for the better. She was supportive of the ordinance because basically the council does not have a choice. Council President Olson offered to amend the last whereas in the ordinance in the packet, explaining the purpose was to remove reference to the U.S. Constitution 2nd Amendment which was not brought as part of the lawsuit and including it in the ordinance confuses the issue and wasn't tested in this case. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE LAST WHEREAS CLAUSE TO READ, "WHEREAS, THESE ORDINANCES WERE FOUND TO CONFLICT WITH THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE STATE, THEREBY VIOLATING ART. XI, SECTION 11 OF THE WASHINGTON CONSTITUTION ON THE GROUNDS THAT RCW 9.41.290 PREEMPTS THE ENTIRE FIELD OF FIREARMS REGULATION;" Council President Olson explained a citizen pointed out the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was a not brought as part of the case. People automatically think it is about the 2nd Amendment and the city Q attorney added the language about the 2nd Amendment to make it clear it wasn't due to a violation of the N 2nd amendment, but in the end it confused the issue instead of clarifying it. N 21 0 Councilmember L. Johnson did not support the amendment, pointing out the State Supreme Court found w it worthy to include this in the judgment. While an assertation has been made that some citizens find it c confusing, she has heard that others find it very clarifying. This ordinance is being repealed due to the E State Supreme Court ruling and this was in the ruling. In their wisdom, the State Supreme court felt this was important enough to include and therefore it is important to include it in the City's repealer ordinance a as well. Councilmember Buckshnis said this change was not included in the packet; she recognized Mr. Taraday was attempting to share screen, but citizens want to see the change that Council President Olson proposed. She found it confusing and said it would be helpful to have it on the screen for citizens and councilmembers to see. Mr. Taraday said he unable to display it due to technical difficulties. Council President Olson said she looked at this extensively when it was at committee but she did not reread the judgment. She asked if was true that the Supreme Court's ruling including the assertion about the 21 Amendment even though it was not brought as part of the case. Mr. Taraday said in a quick word search, he did not see a reference to the 2nd amendment. It is possible Councilmember L. Johnson is remembering his explanation to the committee that the ordinance was not struck down on 2' Amendment grounds, but rather the grounds of preemption. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 25 Packet Pg. 37 7.2.a Councilmember L. Johnson recalled reading this prior to the council packet so it is in the document somewhere. She said the council cannot vote on the amendment if it is not in front of them. Council President Olson offered to email the amendment to councilmembers. Mr. Taraday said there is no prohibition against that or he could also email it. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND TO 10:20. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Olson referenced the amendment in purple on the second page that includes the lined through and replacement words. Councilmember Paine said she did not see anything in the judgment from the State Supreme Court about violating Article 11, Section 11 of the Washington State Constitution. Mr. Taraday said the reference to Article 11, Section 11 is a proper reference; that is the section of the Washington State Constitution that says cities cannot adopt ordinances that conflict with general laws (state statutes), which is the basis for the court's ruling and the reason the City's ordinance was struck down. Because of RCW 9.41.290, which is a general law, Edmonds' ordinance is unconstitutional for conflicting with the general laws. Councilmember Tibbott said he will support the amendment as it clarifies and simplifies the issue. MOTION CARRIED (4-1-1), COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON VOTING NO AND COUNCILMEMBER PAINE ABSTAINING. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. City Clerk Scott Passey advised the ordinance for this item is 4271 and the personnel ordinance was 4270. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Nelson thanked everyone who attended the various concerts and outdoor movie events held in N various parks throughout the City. With regard to the lawsuit, he said there were originally two parties to io the lawsuit, the National Rifle Association and the 2°a Amendment Foundation. He suspected it might have something to do with what they cared about at the federal level. E 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS 13. ADJOURN Q The council meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 26, 2022 Page 26 Packet Pg. 38 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #253374 through #253511 dated July 28, 2022 for $360,857.66 and wire payments of $28,162.06 & $4,453.88. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 07-28-22 wire 07-22-22 wire 07-27-22 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 07-28-22 Packet Pg. 39 7.3.a vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253374 7/28/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun ui INV-2-19624 EDMONDS PD - NGUYEN a) m FIRST TAC POLO E, 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 42.9� a CUSTOM EMBROIDERY w 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 L 12.0( '3 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 5.5'. INV-2-19632 EDMONDS PD - WEISBERG Y EXTERNAL CARRIER U 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 255.0( SAFARILAND ID PANEL W/HEATPRI E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 18.0( NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 w 18.0( G VELCRO FOR NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 12.0( o DBL MAG POUCH Q- Q. 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 41.2! Q 10.1 % Sales Tax N 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 34.7� N INV-2-19871 EDMONDS PD - SCINKOVEC N FLEX FIT CAP ti 0 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 17.5( EMBROIDERY E 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 8.0( 2 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 2.5£ 4) INV-2-19887 EDMONDS PD - PETTIT E 2 ACADEMY S/S SHIRTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 47.9£ Q PATCH INSTALL X 4 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 16.0( SEWN MILITARY CREASES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 24.0( Page: 1 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253374 7/28/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 253375 253376 253377 7/28/2022 073947 A WORKSAFE SERVICE INC 7/28/2022 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 321998 60029 60041 7/28/2022 074143 AFFORDABLE WA BACKFLOW TESTING 517793 7.3.a Page: 2 PO # Description/Account Amoun N 3 HANES T SHIRTS m 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 20.9 , E 3 HEAT PRESS ca 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 51.0( a CREW SWEATSHIRT 3 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 13.9t HEAT PRESS c� 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 17.0( Y PROWOOL CAP U 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 17.5( EMBROIDERY - EDMONDS PD E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 21.9 0 Total: 707.0, > 0 DRUG TESTING a DRUG TEST - WESTON Q' Q 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 55.0( `r Total : 55.0( N ao LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SER\ N ti LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SERA c 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 99.0( E 10.5% Sales Tax cy 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 10.4( PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS- c PARK MAINT PEST CONTROL CUS E 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 129.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 13.5,1 Q Total : 251.9E PM: BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTS PM: BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTS Page: 2 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 3 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253377 7/28/2022 074143 AFFORDABLE WA BACKFLOW TESTING (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 2,440.0( Total: 2,440.0( 253378 7/28/2022 078904 ALEX CHADSEY MUSIC 7/3/22 CIP 7/3/22 SUMMER CONCERT IN THE 1 7/3/2022 SUMMER CONCERT IN TH 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 1,000.0( Total: 1,000.0( 253379 7/28/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC 072622061 FINANCE DEPT WATER Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 36.2'. 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 3.8' Total: 40.0E 253380 7/28/2022 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-209958 TRAFFIC - WHITE & YELLOW TRAF TRAFFIC - WHITE & YELLOW TRAF 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 26,304.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2,762.0( Total: 29,066.8( 253381 7/28/2022 074306 AMWINS GROUP BENEFITS INC 7348643 JUNE PREMIUMS JUNE PREMIUMS 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 7,976.1, JUNE PREMIUMS 001.000.39.517.20.23.10 1,259.7: Total: 9,235.81 253382 7/28/2022 073573 ANIXTER 23K303595 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES F.A.C. - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 116.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.2,' 23K303917 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES Page: 3 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253382 7/28/2022 073573 ANIXTER 253383 7/28/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 4 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) F.A.C. - SUPPLIES m 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,857.3, E 10.5% Sales Tax M 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 a 195.0, Total: 2,181.1( 3 6560039478 WWTP:7/20/22 UNIFORMS,TOWEI c Rentals & Prep Charges $42.22+$4.4 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 52.7 1 Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58.2' 6560039482 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE E PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 2 U 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 55.5( c 10.5% Sales Tax @ 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.8: c 6560039486 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS a FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS Q• Q 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9, N 6560041489 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT ti FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS c 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.Z E FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1( U 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 a� 1.5 , E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.4, 6560041490 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' Page: 4 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253383 7/28/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE y 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' E PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: M 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 a 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 3 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ u) 10.5% Sales Tax U 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 aD 0.3' 10.5% Sales Tax E 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6: 'E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6: o 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, o 10.5% Sales Tax a 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6, Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� N Total: 270.01 N ti 253384 7/28/2022 079059 ARBANASIN, KIM 4/19/2022 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES c REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 39.6 2 Total: 39.6, .. c 253385 7/28/2022 001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC INV379071 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES/ BRASS HO� w E CITY HALL - SUPPLIES/ BRASS HO 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 151.7' 10.25% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 15.5£ Total: 167.2E 253386 7/28/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 124511 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS Page: 5 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253386 7/28/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) UB Outsourcing area Printing 717 y 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 52.5, E UB Outsourcing area Printing 717 a 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 52.5: UB Outsourcing area Printing 717 3 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 54.1' UB Outsourcing area Postage 718 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 163.9( u) UB Outsourcing area Postage 718 U 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 163.9,1 10.25% Sales Tax E 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 5.3t 'E 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 5.3� o 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 5.5: o Total: 503.31 a Q 253387 7/28/2022 079046 BAHRU, ANDU 2006999.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ N 001.000.239.200 172.0£ N Total: 172.0i ti 0 253388 7/28/2022 002258 BENS EVER READY 22552/10540 FLEET - 4- NEW EXTINGUISHER & I E E FLEET - 4- NEW EXTINGUISHER & I cy 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 508.0( 10.5% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 53.3z E E Total: 561.31 u ca 253389 7/28/2022 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 826213 UNIT 425 - PARTS/ BATTERY Q UNIT 425 - PARTS/ BATTERY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 135.9( 10.25% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.9z Page: 6 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 253389 7/28/2022 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC (Continued) 826441 UNIT 64 - PARTS UNIT 64 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.25% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total : 253390 7/28/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 1352066 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 604.60 G, FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 604.60 G, 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1353362 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 Total 253391 7/28/2022 003074 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 22005649 PED WALK WAY LEASE #40229033 PED WALK WAY LEASE #40229033 111.000.68.542.31.45.00 Total: 253392 7/28/2022 078841 BRAUN CONSULTING GROUP 2294 CONSULTING RETAINER - JUNE JUNE RETAINER 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2300 RETAINER - JULY JULY CONSULTING 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Total: 253393 7/28/2022 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 347804 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM -1 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 7.3.a Page: 7 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253393 7/28/2022 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL (Continued) WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i m 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1,594.3( E, 10.5% Sales Tax ca 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 a 167.4( y 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 167.4( 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 167.4( u) 10.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 W 167.4' Total: 7,046.8, E 253394 7/28/2022 078905 BURKHARDT, DENNIS R 7/19/22 HMP HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT U Agreement for Presentation Services: c 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 200.0( @ Total: 200.0( p L 253395 7/28/2022 079057 BUSS, DAISY 2007012.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: Q Q REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE I 001.000.239.200 172.0£ N Total : 172.01 ao N 253396 7/28/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 28847287 PW ADMIN COPIER o PW Office Copier for 7/01/22 - 7/31/2 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 66.1( PW Office Copier for 7/01/22 - 7/31/2 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 37.4� PW Office Copier for 7/01/22 - 7/31/2 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 26.4( PW Office Copier for 7/01/22 - 7/31/2 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 26.4( Q PW Office Copier for 7/01/22 - 7/31/2 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 26.4( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 6.9( Page: 8 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253396 7/28/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 9 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax y 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 3.9, E 10.5% Sales Tax M 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 a 3.9z 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 2.7£ 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 2.7£ u) 10.5% Sales Tax U 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 aD 2.7( t PW Office Copier for 7/01/22 - 7/31/2 U E 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 28847288 EDMONDS PD 7/22 CONTRACT - FAXBOARD o 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.0, 10.5% Sales Tax o L 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 3.7£ a 28847292 EDMONDS PD Q 7/22 - CONTRACT 3AP0125MAP0 N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 351.9' N 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.9( c 28847294 C5750 U) contract charges July 2022 E 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 181.6: TU contract charges July 2022 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 22.7( contract charges July 2022 E 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 22.7' 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 19.0 1 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 2.3£ 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 9 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 10 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253396 7/28/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.3� y 28847295 P&R C5750 COPIER: CONTRACT OE E P&R C5750 Copier: Contract NumberCL ca 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 227.0z 10.5% Sales Tax 3 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 23.8z 28847298 WWTP: 7/2022 CONTRACT CHG - C 7/2022 CONTRACT CHG - COPIER I ca N 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 81.8z U 10.5% Sales Tax t 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 8.6( U E 28847299 EDMONDS PD 7/22 CONTRACT- 38CO1511 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 191.7E c 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 20.1: c 28847300 FLEET COPIER a Fleet Copier Q 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 35.0 j `r 10.5% Sales Tax N 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 3.6� N 28847301 P&R C2571F COPIER: S/N 3CE0793: ti P&R C257iF Copier: Contract Numbe y 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 35.0 , E 10.5% Sales Tax 2 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 U 3.6� }; 28847303 PM C2571F COPIER: S/N 3CE08178 a� P&R C2571F COPIER: S/N 3CE0793: E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 29.0£ 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 3.0E Q 28847307 HS C2571F COPIER: S/N 3CE09644 PM C2571F COPIER: S/N 3CE08178: 001.000.63.557.20.45.00 31.9£ Page: 10 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253396 7/28/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 253397 7/28/2022 077353 CAPITOL CONSULTING LLC 253398 7/28/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC PO # Description/Account 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.63.557.20.45.00 28847308 CEMETERY MF1238 COPIER: S/N 3 CEMETERY MF1238 COPIER: S/N 3 130.000.64.536.50.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.45.00 28847310 WATER SEWER COPIER Water Sewer Copier 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 Total 7 STATE LOBBYIST JULY 2022 STATE LOBBYIST JULY 2022 001.000.61.511.70.41.00 Total BK83923 AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D ANNUAL SUBS( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.48.00 AutoCAD Civil 3D annual subscriptior 001.000.64.571.21.48.00 BM68080 CISCO SMARTNET EXTENDED AGF Cisco Smartnet extended service 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total: 7.3.a Page: 11 Amoun N c m 3.3f E c� a a� 8.6( '3 0.9' lie 57.8, t 57.8, 6.0 o 6.0, o L 1,758.71 a :� N N 3,750.0( N 3,750.0( r; 0 E 258.8� c 2,465.6( E ca 922.0( Q 96.8' 3,743.3( Page: 11 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253399 7/28/2022 074444 DATAQUEST LLC 253400 7/28/2022 079038 DAWES, KIMBERLY 253401 7/28/2022 061860 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES 253402 7/28/2022 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 253403 7/28/2022 076172 DK SYSTEMS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 12 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 18132 BACKGROUND CHECK - APRIL ui background overage - Arif y 001.000.23.512.51.49.00 95.5( E background checks a 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 300.0( 18663 BACKGROUND CHECKS - JUNE 3 BACKGROUND CHECKS - JUNE 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 1,984.4E PARKS OVERAGE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 20.0( u Total: 2,399.9E 2006989.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: E REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 2 U 001.000.239.200 172.M£ c Total : 172.01 351402 MUSEUM - BOILER INSPECTION a MUSEUM - BOILER INSPECTION Q- Q 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 66.8( 351633 PUBLIC SAFETY - INSPECTION N N PUBLIC SAFETY - INSPECTION ao 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 38.4( Total : 105.2( c 22-4175 COUNCIL & COMMITTEE MEETING E City Council Meeting minutes 7/19/22 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 810.0( Total: 810.0( 31859 LIBRARY- LABOR/ FAN FAIL ALARN LIBRARY- LABOR/ FAN FAIL ALARN ca Q 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 337.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 35.41 Total : 372.9� Page: 12 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 13 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253404 7/28/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 3126 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES ui FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES m 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.5£ E 10.5% Sales Tax M 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 a 1.2, 3179 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 3 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 43.9 , 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.6, u 3183 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES t F.A.C. - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.9( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.0`. o 3188 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ KEYS 10.5% Sales Tax c L 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.6£ a PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ KEYS Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.0, N 971772 WWTP: NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS N NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS 00 N 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.7� c 10.5% Sales Tax U) 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1.0:.� Total: 100.9E 253405 7/28/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-01127 WWTP: 5/17-7/15/22 METER 2088: c 5/17-7/15/22 200 2ND AVE S / MET E E 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 212.2, 6-01130 WWTP: 5/17-7/15/22 METER 9439: +° 5/17-7/15/22 200 2ND AVE S / METI Q 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 23.7'. 6-01140 WWTP: 5/17-7/15/22 METER 50104 5/17-7/15/22 200 2ND AVE S / METE 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 2,164.5E Page: 13 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253405 7/28/2022 008705 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 253406 7/28/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR214696 AR224053 AR224554 AR224841 AR224843 7.3.a Page: 14 PO # Description/Account Amoun Total : 2,400.51 c ACCT MK5031 - EDMONDS PD E 2/22 C58501 BW&CLR CHARGES c� 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 86.5� Q- 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 9.0' 3 ACCT MK5031 - EDMONDS PD c 06/22 C58501 BW & CLR CHARGES f° 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 102.9� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 10.8' CANON 5750 OVERAGES E b/w overage 6/16-7/15/2022 2 U 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 5.6', o clr overage 6/16-7/15/2022 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 63.0( o clr overage 6/16-7/15/2022 a 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 7.8£ Q clr overage 6/16-7/15/2022 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 7.81 N 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 7.2' ti 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 0.8: E 10.5% Sales Tax .2 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.8, U COPIER LEASE/MONTHLY CONTRA Contract overage charge 6/19/22-7/17 E 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 4.5� U 10.5% Sales Tax +° 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 0.4£ Q COPIER LEASE/MONTHLY CONTRA Contract overage charge for 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 0.11, 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 14 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 15 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253406 7/28/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 0.0' Total: 307.8, 253407 7/28/2022 078919 EMERALD CITY FLOORBALL 10762 10755 10762 10755 FLOORBALL CLASS IN 10762 FLOORBALL CLASS INSTRU, 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 9.0( 10755 FLOORBALL CLASS INSTRU, 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 86.4( Total: 95.4( 253408 7/28/2022 074437 EMPLOYERS HEALTH COALITION WA 2022-coed-retmedg3 RETIREE DUES Q4-21 THROUGH C retiree dues Q4-21 through Q3-22 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 6,120.0( Total: 6,120.0( 253409 7/28/2022 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 312 000 093 ES REF # 94513310 7 Q2-22 Unemployment Claims 001.000.39.517.78.23.00 6,659.01 Q2-22 Unemployment Claims 423.000.76.535.80.23.10 6,199.9( Total: 12,858.91 253410 7/28/2022 079037 ERICKSON, LAURA CLAIM FOR EXPENSES CLAIM FOR EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 376.3z Total: 376.31 253411 7/28/2022 079044 ERMOLINA, EKATERINA 2006997.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.0i 253412 7/28/2022 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 365044 UNIT 19 - SUPPLIES UNIT 19 - SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 170.0( 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 15 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 253412 7/28/2022 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total: 253413 7/28/2022 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1113905 WATER - PARTS/ BRASS PIPE & 4" WATER - PARTS/ BRASS PIPE & 4" 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1113905-1 WATER - PARTS/ 6" SADDLE WATER - PARTS/ 6" SADDLE 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1119398 WATER - PARTS/ 24" & 30" VB BOTI WATER - PARTS/ 24" & 30" VB BOT7 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total: 253414 7/28/2022 079060 FRONTLINE UAS LLC 1086 EDMONDS PD - GREENMUN PIX4DMAPPER CLASS - GREENMU 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Total: 253415 7/28/2022 079039 GLENDENNING, JOSHUA 2006990.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total: 253416 7/28/2022 072585 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 119339335 PARKS - PARTITIONS PARKS - PARTITIONS 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 Freight 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 7.3.a Page: 16 Page: 16 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253416 7/28/2022 072585 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC (Continued) 253417 7/28/2022 079025 GORDY'S 2 LANE MANAGEMENT 253418 7/28/2022 012199 GRAINGER 253419 7/28/2022 079061 GREENSTAGE 253420 7/28/2022 067615 GTS INTERIOR SUPPLY PO # Description/Account 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 119344797 PARKS - PARTITIONS PARKS - PARTITIONS 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 Freight 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 Total 7/14/22 HMP HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT Agreement for Presentation Services: 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total 9375490035 PM SUPPLIES: FLEXIBLE METAL H( PM SUPPLIES: FLEXIBLE METAL H( 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 10864 THEATRE CAMP 10864 THEATRE CAMP INSTRUCTI( 10864 THEATRE CAMP INSTRUCTI( 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total: 40115392-00 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES F.A.C. - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 HANDLING CHARGE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.9% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.3.a Page: 17 Page: 17 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 18 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253420 7/28/2022 067615 067615 GTS INTERIOR SUPPLY (Continued) Total: 317.8( 253421 7/28/2022 079048 GUSTAFSON, ANDROMEDA 2007002.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.01 253422 7/28/2022 074804 HARLES, JANINE 284613 PHOTOGRAPHY & INSTAGRAM SEI PHOTOGRAPHY & INSTAGRAM SEI 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 300.0( Total: 300.0( 253423 7/28/2022 076333 HASA INC 814305 WWTP: SOD. HYPOCHLORITE SOD. HYPOCHLORITE 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 6,606.61 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 693.7( 824902 WWTP: SOD. HYPOCHLORITE SOD. HYPOCHLORITE 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 6,748.4'. 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 708.5� Total: 14,757.4' 253424 7/28/2022 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 16154477 WATER - SUPPLIES/ DRAINAGE FA WATER - SUPPLIES/ DRAINAGE FA 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 636.9 1 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 66.8f Total: 703.8! 253425 7/28/2022 013140 HENDERSON, BRIAN 36 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 933.0( Total: 933.0( 253426 7/28/2022 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC 2019-334 TOURISM PROMOTION & MARKETI Page: 18 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 19 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253426 7/28/2022 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC (Continued) TOURISM PROMOTION & MARKETI 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 2,851.61 CONTRACTOR WRITING - CAROL V 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 100.0( Tota I : 2.951.6, 253427 7/28/2022 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 38 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 Total 253428 7/28/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0552883398 YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0552900767 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total: 253429 7/28/2022 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG CD22-03 HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 CD22-04 HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 CD22-05 HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total: 253430 7/28/2022 079033 HYUN SON SHIN 01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Korean interpretation at neighborhooc 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total: 253431 7/28/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC U2216033639 WATER - PARTS/ VALVE BOX & COS Page: 19 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 20 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253431 7/28/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC (Continued) WATER - PARTS/ VALVE BOX & COS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2,300.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 241.5( Total 253432 7/28/2022 063419 INTOXIMETERS INC 711691 CUST 7112022 - EDMONDS PD PBT TESTING DEVICES 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 MOUTHPIECE CUP 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 MOUTHPIECE FST 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 MOUTHPIECE TEST SAFE 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 Total 253433 7/28/2022 072627 INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC 6063847 MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT Monthly 911 database maint 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total: 253434 7/28/2022 079050 JAMES, MEGAN 2007004.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total: 253435 7/28/2022 079055 KIKIKIS, ABIGAIL 2007010.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 21 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253435 7/28/2022 079055 079055 KIKIKIS, ABIGAIL (Continued) Total: 172.0i 253436 7/28/2022 077583 KINCAID, KELSEY 2006991.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total : 172.01 253437 7/28/2022 077586 KNIGHT, REID 2007001.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total : 172.0i 253438 7/28/2022 079056 LAZERTE, ADAM 2007011.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.0i 253439 7/28/2022 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 20580 expenses 06-2022 REIMBURSEMENT FOR EX 06/22 reimbursement for expenses- P 001.000.36.515.41.41.00 1,596.2E Total: 1,596.2E 253440 7/28/2022 076561 LITTLEJOHN, MONICA 2007009.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.01 253441 7/28/2022 079045 LUCAS, REBEKAH 2O06998.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.0i 253442 7/28/2022 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO 053883 01 PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 453.3E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 47.6( Page: 21 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 22 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253442 7/28/2022 074263 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO (Continued) Total: 500.9E 253443 7/28/2022 079053 LYON, CARRIE 2007007.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.01 253444 7/28/2022 071140 MAD SCIENCE OF SNO-KING 10876 MAD SCIENCE 10876 MAD SCIENCE CAMP INSTRI 10876 MAD SCIENCE CAMP INSTRI 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 1,958.0( Total: 1,958.0( 253445 7/28/2022 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0155933 F.A.C. - PAINT F.A.C. - PAINT 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 508.2z 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 53.3 1 253446 7/28/2022 078252 MCDONNELL, TERESA 253447 7/28/2022 079058 MCLEOD, KATHERINE 253448 7/28/2022 076983 MCMAHON, JANE Total 2006995.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total 2007013.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 2007014.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total 07122022 UPTOWN EVENING MARKET PERF UPTOWN EVENING MARKET PERF 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total Page: 22 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 23 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253449 7/28/2022 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA 10799 FELDENKRAIS 10799 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI 10799 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI m 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 85.8( E Total: 85.8( M a 253450 7/28/2022 079047 MEIER, ERIN 2007000.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE 3 001.000.239.200 172.0E c Total : 172.01 lie 253451 7/28/2022 079041 MERK, EILEEN 2006993.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: aUi REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE I 001.000.239.200 172.0E E Total: 172.0i 2 253452 7/28/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 377347 PM: CORDLESS PRUNER w PM: CORDLESS PRUNER > 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 159.9� o 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 16.8( Q 377351 PM: SELF PROPELLED MOWER KP c14 PM: SELF PROPELLED MOWER KP N ao 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 1,009.9E N 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 106.0f E 377352 PM: OIL PM: OIL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 250.4, 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 26.Z Total: 1,569.5: Q 253453 7/28/2022 078942 NATIONAL TRENCH SAFETY 10005946 WATER/ SEWER - SHORING BOX WATER/ SEWER - SHORING BOX 421.000.74.594.34.64.00 9,090.0( 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 23 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253453 7/28/2022 078942 NATIONAL TRENCH SAFETY (Continued) 421.000.74.594.34.64.00 954.4,1 Total: 10,044.4! 253454 7/28/2022 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 10482964 FSA- COMMUTER GONAVIA COMMUTER 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 25.0( 10482965 FSA FEES -JUNE FSA FEES - JUNE 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 215.8( Total : 240.8( 253455 7/28/2022 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0803799-IN FLEET - FILTERS FLEET - FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 3.8z 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 0.4( 0803972-IN FLEET - FILTERS FLEET - FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 75.6£ 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 7.9! Total : 87.8 , 253456 7/28/2022 075542 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 6240 ROADWAY - SUPPLIES ROADWAY - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 69.0( 10.6% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 7.3' Total : 76.3' 253457 7/28/2022 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 75225263 DOT RECERTIFICATION DOT RECERT - KOBYLK 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 110.0( 75525945 DOT CERTIFICATION DOT RECERT - CLEMENS Page: 24 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253457 7/28/2022 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA (Continued) 75741995 253458 7/28/2022 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 253459 7/28/2022 079049 OWENS, JEFFREY 253460 7/28/2022 075694 PACIFIC SOUND DESIGN 75818410 75961092 INV0600281 2007003.009 PMT 1 SOUND CIP PO # Description/Account 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 DOT RECERTIFICATION DOT RECERT - JOHNSON, BROWN 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 DOT RECERT - MATTHEWS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 DOT RECERT - MERBACK 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 DOT RECERTIFICATION DOT RECERT-HIATT 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 DOT RECERT - WARD 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PRE -EMPLOYMENT PRE -EMPLOYMENT - LUTTRELL 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 Total YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL SUPPLIES: CHEMICAL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total SOUND FOR SUMMER CONCERTS SOUND FOR SUMMER CONCERTS 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total 7.3.a Page: 25 Amoun N 110.0( y E c� 330.0( L 110.0( c ca 110.0( Y U a� t 110.0( M 110.0( z 4- 0 0 76.0( c L 1,066.0( a :� N N 1,039.4( N ti 109.1, " 1,148.5' E U c 172.Of 172.0( ca 600.0( 600.0( Page: 25 Packet Pg. 64 Q vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253461 7/28/2022 027450 PAWS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice JUNE 2022 253462 7/28/2022 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT 22071 22072 253463 7/28/2022 074830 PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS INTEG 12470063 12470325 253464 7/28/2022 070431 PITNEYBOWES EASYPERMIT POSTAGE 8000 9090 0618 6873 253465 7/28/2022 076892 PNCWA 5098 PO # Description/Account JUNE - EDMONDS PD JUNE ANIMAL SHELTERING 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Total : PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 7.5 H Planning Board Minutes 7.5 hrs 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 PLANNING: PROF SVCS Arch Design Board- 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total F.A.C. - FIRE ALARM SERVICE LAB, F.A.C. - FIRE ALARM SERVICE LAB, 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 FUEL SURCHARGE 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 F.A.C. - FIRE ALARM SERVICE F.A.C. - FIRE ALARM SERVICE 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 FUELSURCHARGE 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 Total BULK MAIL POSTAGE Bulk Mail Postage 001.000.31.514.31.42.00 Total WWTP: PRANDOLPH 2O22 PNCWA PRANDOLPH 2O22 PNCWA CONFEI 7.3.a Page: 26 Page: 26 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 27 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253465 7/28/2022 076892 PNCWA (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 599.0( Total: 599.0( 253466 7/28/2022 064167 POLLARD WATER WP030019 WATER - SUPPLIES/ FIREHOSE WATER - SUPPLIES/ FIREHOSE 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 659.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 69.2£ Total: 729.0£ 253467 7/28/2022 078941 PRR INC 4337.01-01 PROF SVCS Edmonds Comp Plan Visioning-- 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 2,420.51 4337.01-02 PROF SVCS Edmonds Comp Plan Visioning- 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 10,988.5, Total : 13,409.1( 253468 7/28/2022 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC 2022-442 Q2 SUBSCRIPTION FEES Q2 FEES 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 857.0( Total : 857.0( 253469 7/28/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 220027305568 WWTP: 6/21-7/21/22 200 2ND AVE E 6/21-7/21/22 200 2ND AVE S, #WST- 423.000.76.535.80.47.63 37.0' Total: 37.0' 253470 7/28/2022 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 39975 MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HAW LEY MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HAWLEY 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( 40673 MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HOFFER MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HOFFER 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 216.0( 42126 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-GLI INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-GLi Page: 27 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 28 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253470 7/28/2022 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC (Continued) 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 150.0( y =1156 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-GA E INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-GACL c� 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 -150.0( =1157 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SEI INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-SEI 3 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 -150.0( cm1158 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-GRlie INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-GR U 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 -150.0( Total: 141.0( 253471 7/28/2022 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SOUND & DATA 23860 CITY HALL - SERVICE CALL AC FIRI 2 U CITY HALL - SERVICE CALL AC FIRI o 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 416.5( @ 10.5% Sales Tax c 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 43.7, a Total: 460.2; Q 253472 7/28/2022 068657 ROBERT HALF 60265075 TEMPORARY HELP WE 06/24/22 C14 OGSTON Co 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 1,848.0( N 60311080 TEMP HELP W/E 07/01/2022 0 OGSTON E 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2,310.0( 60343001 TEMP HELP W/E 07/08/2022 U OGSTON 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 1,848.0( 60385308 TEMP HELP W/E 07/15/2022 OGSTON 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 1,848.0( Q Total: 7,854.0( 253473 7/28/2022 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-037018 UNIT 10 - BATTERY UNIT 10 - BATTERY Page: 28 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 29 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253473 7/28/2022 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 133.5E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 14.0, 5-037105 UNIT 9 - BATTERY UNIT 9 - BATTERY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 267.1( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 28.0E Total: 442.7, 253474 7/28/2022 079043 SAWYER, THOMAS 2006996.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.0i 253475 7/28/2022 072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC 61429665 WWTP: PO 848 TUBE-HYD PO 848 TUBE-HYD 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 160.8E Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1,139.5E 61701183 WWTP: CREDIT FOR FRT CHARGE CREDIT FOR FRT CHARGES ON IN' 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 -51.8, Total: 1,248.6, 253476 7/28/2022 066918 SEDOR, NORMAN 37 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 6,000.0( Total: 6,000.0( 253477 7/28/2022 077069 SEMACONNECT INC NWS-2207052 CITY WIDE - NETWORK SERVICE F CITY WIDE - NETWORK SERVICE F 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 1,440.0( Total: 1,440.0( 253478 7/28/2022 063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 3071-1 CEMETERY PAINT SUPPLIES Page: 29 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 30 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253478 7/28/2022 063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS (Continued) CEMETERY PAINT SUPPLIES 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 104.9, 10.5% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 11.01 253479 7/28/2022 071655 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 253480 7/28/2022 036850 SMITH, SHERLUND D 253481 7/28/2022 060889 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL B15502972 39 ARV/53585417 253482 7/28/2022 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 3752 253483 7/28/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202547 200398956 Total JUN-2022 CLOUD SERVICE CHARC Jun-2022 Cloud Service Charges 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 Total REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 Total FLEET - HOSE CLAMP KIT FLEET - HOSE CLAMP KIT 511.000.77.548.68.35.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.35.00 Total PUBLIC DEFENSE - JUNE JUNE 001.000.39.515.93.41.00 Total PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST Page: 30 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 31 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253483 7/28/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 823.0E y 200468593 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / E, LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / ca 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 211.41 w 200493146 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M 3 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 23.7z r- 200611317 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V N LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V U 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 131.9, t 200638609 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON E 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 184.3( U 200714038 SEAVIEW PARK - SEAVIEW PARK @ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 25.5,1 p 200739845 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH a SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH Q' Q 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 22.2E `r 201197084 SEAVIEW PARK cN� SEAVIEW PARK N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 34.5 ti 201236825 FISHING PIER RESTROOMS c FISHING PIER RESTROOMS E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 148.4z 2 201327111 PINE ST PARK U PINE ST PARK c 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 25.2, E 201431244 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 25.2: Q 201551744 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / P 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,010.5E 201572898 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME Page: 31 Packet Pg. 70 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253483 7/28/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 32 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME m 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 47.4, E 201751476 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW ca TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW a� w 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 49.7' 3 201942489 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; a 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 80.2( u) PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; U 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 304.9( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 304.9( •= PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 6 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 304.9£ o PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 304.9£ o L PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; a 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 304.9( Q 202291662 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1 , N CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1, N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 5,360.2( N 202439246 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER c CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,018.7'. .E 202807632 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW U }; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 25.5t 203652151 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 E FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 120.7 1 220216386 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF Q PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 M/ 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 59.9� 223189747 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 8326 196' Page: 32 Packet Pg. 71 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 33 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253483 7/28/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 8326 196- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 29.6z Total: 13,007.3, 253484 7/28/2022 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 81854 PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,274.0( ILLEGAL DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 12.0( Total: 1,286.0( 253485 7/28/2022 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 26042 WWTP: 7/20/22 CARPET CLEANING 7/20/22 CARPET CLEANING 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 279.0( Total: 279.0( 253486 7/28/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103587 PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,162.3z Total: 1,162.31 253487 7/28/2022 075971 STEEL MAGIC NORTHWEST 10868 STEEL BAND 10868 STEEL BAND CAMP INSTRU( 10868 STEEL BAND CAMP INSTRU( 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 180.0( Total: 180.0( 253488 7/28/2022 076054 STRUM, KRAIG 076054 07-22-22 STRUM EXPENSES 076054 07-22-2 EXPENSES (PER DIEM) FOR TRAIN 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 116.7,1 Total: 116.7! 253489 7/28/2022 072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT 10646 10647 CAMP 10646 10647 BEACH CAMP 10646 BEACH CAMP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 10647 BEACH CAMP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Page: 33 Packet Pg. 72 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253489 7/28/2022 072319 072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT 253490 7/28/2022 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC 253491 7/28/2022 078929 SUSTAIN MUSIC PROJECT 253492 7/28/2022 079052 SWARTHOUT, MATTHEW 253493 7/28/2022 079054 SYMES, LIZ Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 11376 7/24/22 HMP 2007006.009 253494 7/28/2022 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 180036576-01 180042502-00 180042505-00 PO # Description/Account Total: SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR JUL SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR JUL 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Total HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT Agreement for Presentation Services: 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total ROADWAY - SUPPLIES ROADWAY - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 FLEET - SUPPLIES FLEET - SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 ROADWAY - SUPPLIES ROADWAY - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 7.3.a Page: 34 Page: 34 Packet Pg. 73 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 35 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253494 7/28/2022 040917 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued) Total: 1,435.51 253495 7/28/2022 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 96310 CLOTHING ITEMS FOR CODE ENF( Polo, Jacket and Hat for DGooding (C 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 201.9f 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 21.0( Total: 222.9! 253496 7/28/2022 068105 THORSON MCDONALD WHITEMAN & 88786 MEBTACCOUNT MEBT 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2,720.0( Total : 2,720.0( 253497 7/28/2022 079006 TIFFANY ROSE NAPUTI LACSADO CSED-052522 CANDIDATE REIMBURSEMENT TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 001.000.22.518.10.49.00 1,068.0' Total : 1,068.0' 253498 7/28/2022 079029 TOOLE DESIGN GROUP LLC SEA.00104_01 CONSULTANT FOR: RE -IMAGINING Consultant for: Re -Imagining Streets 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 8,830.0( Total : 8,830.0( 253499 7/28/2022 078891 TUBE ART GROUP 120531 HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE HWY 99 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE 001.000.60.557.20.48.00 7,623.8� Total : 7,623.8$ 253500 7/28/2022 070902 ULVESTAD, KAREN 10863 PHOTOGRAPHY 10863 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY CL) 10863 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY CL) 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 212.5( Total : 212.5( 253501 7/28/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9911029779 C/A671247844-00001 Cell Service Fac-Maint 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 103.9, Page: 35 Packet Pg. 74 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 36 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253501 7/28/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) Cell Service-PD 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 41.5( Cell Service-PW Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 41.5( 253502 7/28/2022 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 253503 7/28/2022 079042 WASKE, SARA 253504 7/28/2022 079051 WAWRZYCKI, BRIANNE 253505 7/28/2022 078302 WEBER, CAROL 253506 7/28/2022 074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH Total 122007614 JUNE 2022 - EDMONDS PD CPL BACKGROUNDS- JUNE 001.000.237.100 BACKGROUNDS-JUNE 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 Total 2006994.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total 2007005.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 Total 18 VISIT EDMONDS WEBSITE SUPPOI VISIT EDMONDS WEBSITE SUPPOI 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total 2557055 MARCH & APRIL - EDMONDS PD MARCH & APRIL RANGE FEES 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 2609189 MAY & JUNE - EDMONDS PD MAY & JUNE RANGE RENTAL FEES Page: 36 Packet Pg. 75 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 37 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253506 7/28/2022 074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH (Continued) 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 2,504.1 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 249.8' Total: 3,231.9E 253507 7/28/2022 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000052390 TRAFFIC - RADAR FEED BACK TRAFFIC - RADAR FEED BACK 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 4,981.6( Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 397.2' 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 564.7£ Total: 5,943.6E 253508 7/28/2022 075232 WETMILLER, TIMOTHY RICHARD 7/21/22 HMP HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT Agreement for Presentation Services: 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 600.0( Total: 600.0( 253509 7/28/2022 079040 WILLIAMS, WILLARD 2006992.009 REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE: REFUND: PRESCHOOL CLOSURE[ 001.000.239.200 172.0£ Total: 172.0E 253510 7/28/2022 078807 ZACHOR STOCK & KREPPS INC PS 22-EDM-0007 253511 7/28/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 253-007-4989 253-012-9166 JUL-2022 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.41.41.20 Total SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Page: 37 Packet Pg. 76 vchlist 07/28/2022 9:57:55AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.a Page: 38 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253511 7/28/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER (Continued) TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES m 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 302.4, E 253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE ca TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE a� w 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.8� 3 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.9z 253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE U 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 47.0£ t TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 87.4, •@ 425-697-6502 MUSEUM ALARM LINES - 118 5TH P U Museum Alarm Lines - 118 5th Ave N p 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 114.7E 425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE p CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE 0- 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 79.2E Q 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 `r CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 73.0- N 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER AL, ti FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF c 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 150.0: E Total: 1,104.8i 2 138 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total : 360,857.6E c w 138 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 360,857.6E ca Q Page: 38 Packet Pg. 77 7.3.b vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun .-. N 0881/5437 UMC CC JUNE 2022 FRED MEYER - COMMUNITY COUR E 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 182.2£ ORCA - COMMUNITY COURT BUS C Q- 001.000.23.523.30.43.00 560.0( a) COSTCO - COMMUNITY COURT - S 3 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 411.81 STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES f° 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 U) 452.0 � DRY CLEANING/TAILOR - JUDGE'S t 001.000.23.512.51.49.00 131.5( u STAPLES - OFFICE SUPPLIES E 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 210.0E TU COSTCO - COMMUNITY COURT - F, o 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 165.8E ia DRY CLEANING - JUDGES ROBES o 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 60.5( Q. FRED MEYER - OFFICE SUPPLIES Q- Q 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 71.1 1 " 1807 HAWLEY CC 1807 07-06-22 N N GAS TO ATTEND TRAINING LOCALI c� 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 N 206.9, ti 1880 parks 1880 PARKS CREDIT CARD AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: SF 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 13.2, 3 AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: G) c 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 55.2, E AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: Sl 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 41.3z +° AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: DOCU Q 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 17.1 z AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: FOLD[ 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 23.1 � AMAZON: ADMIN SUPPLIES: NOTEI Page: 1 Packet Pg. 78 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 8.8' COSTCO: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: SP 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 104.8z >% UPLIFT DESK: STANDING DESKS a 001.000.64.571.21.35.00 3,982.4, AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: O' 3 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 39.9, AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: Pl. 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 47.5( Y AMERICAN RED CROSS: CPR ONLI aUi 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 70.0( U AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: Sl E 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 233.5( 2 AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: DI 4- 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 33.1 £ c AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: LOCKS, > 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 78.0 j 0 CL AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: G) Q- Q 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 97.6� AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: G) N 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 N 347.4, cN ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE N ti 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 39.0E AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: BF 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 26.4£ 3 AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: BL 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 31.5' E AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: COPY P/ 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 58.2' cc AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: NE Q 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 33.1 z AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: CARDS? 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 8.8, QFC: YOUTH COMMISSION SUPPLI Page: 2 Packet Pg. 79 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 N 17.3z DOMINOS: YOUTH COMMISSION S1 >% 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 26.4 AMAZON: DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: P( a 001.000.64.571.26.31.00 142.7, 2519 PD 1 2519 07-06-22 3 FED Ex - WSP Toxicology Lab c 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 21.7£ FED Ex - Firearms Buyback/Trade � 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 262.2( aUi 2969 COUNCIL VISA SUPPLIES U Supplies; file folders, resolution E 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 48.4: 2 Award plaque for student rep ,- 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 39.5z o Publication: Elected Official Guide to > 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 33.6 " 4171 MCCLURE CC 4171 07-06-22 CL a APPLE CLOUD STORAGE - REOCC Q 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 0.9� N FLASHLIGHT ENGRAVING N 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 92.01 ti 4729 EHLERT CC 4729 07-06-22 c COSTCO - STORAGE BINS FOR PR 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 120.2: 3 COSTCO - CANDY FOR 4TH OF JUL 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 287.8, AMAZON - SUPPLY ORDER t 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 153.5' M NATIONAL NIGHT OUT SWAG Q 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 465.0( JIMMY JOHNS - 4TH OF JULY 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 117.2' DOMINOS - 4TH OF JULY Page: 3 Packet Pg. 80 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 4 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 46.9 , AMAZON - SUPPLY ORDER >% 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 24.4' 4929 US BANK DEV SVCS a Amazon-- W 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 13.2`. 3 Amazon- c 001.000.62.524.10.35.00 18.1 £ Adobe- � 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 91.11aUi Click2Mail- U 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 56.5£ E Amazon- U 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 27.6' 4- The Branding Iron- o 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 414.3£ > Click2Mail-- o Q . 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 129.7, 0- Amazon- < 001.000.62.524.10.35.00 26.5' N Seattle Times- N 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 67.5( ti Amazon- o 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 110.4� .= The Branding Iron- 3 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 226.5: Ladro- E 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 117.3( Cafe Ladro- 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 60.0( Q Amazon- 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 53.6, The Branding Iron- 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 17.6f Page: 4 Packet Pg. 81 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 5 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ Amazon- N 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 120.2, Adobe- >+ 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 c� 117.1( Q- Click2Mail-- 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 241.1 £ 3 Snacks for reimagining neighborhood 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 117.3( f° Ladro- Y 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 U 117.3( t MailChimp- U 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 25.4, E 5160 HP LAPTOPS, CISCO SWITCH, BLU �° Server Supply - Ws-c2960x-24td-I 4- 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 955.5( c Newegg.com - HP ProBook 450 Lapt( > 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 4,508.3: 0 CL Newegg.com - Tripp Lite Cat6 cables Q- Q 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 153.7' ARIN - American Registry for Internet N N 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 500.0( c4 Newegg.com - Logitech MX ERGO pl N ti 001.000.64.571.21.49.00 119.4, Trimble - SketchUp Pro 1 yr 001.000.64.571.21.48.00 330.4( 3 Bluebeam Inc - Bluebeam Revu Stan, 001.000.64.571.21.48.00 415.7( E 5401 SAUNDERS CC 5401 07-06-22 GRANTS WRITING TRAINING - EHL 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 455.0( Q ROOM RENTAL FOR INDIVIDUAL IN 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 279.4 5401 SAUNDERS CC 5401 07-06-22 REFI REFUND FROM SILVER STATE COS Page: 5 Packet Pg. 82 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 6 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK (Continued) ^ 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 -115.0( 6714 SNIFFEN CC 6714 07-06-22 >, WSU FBINAA CONFERENCE AND T 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 939.7! a SKAMANIA LODGE HOTEL HOLD - I 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 199.2 , 3 SKAMANIA LODGE HOTEL HOLD - 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 199.2 , SKAMANIA LODGE HOTEL HOLD - I � 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 199.2 1 aUi WSU FBINAA CONFERENCE AND T U 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 472.5( E 6714 SNIFFEN CC 6714 07-06-22 CREDII 0 WSU REFUND FOR EVENTS AT TR, ,- 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 -80.0( c 6748 DAWKINS CC 6748 07-06-22 > GAS FOR CITY VEHICLE L 001.000.41.521.10.43.00 15.7� a 7573 SMITH CC 7573 07-06-22 Q WAPRO CERTIFICATION - KERN N 001.000.41.521.11.49.00 N 100.0( N DETECTIVE SUPPLIES N 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 57.Z c FINGERPRINT STATION ACCESSOF 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 32.0, 3 8017 ENG CC JUNE 2022 PAINT FOR SIDEWALK DINING-JW 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 16.4£ t KEYBOARD/MOUSE-MD 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 53.5£ Q E20CE/BROCHURE BOXES 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 158.9z E21 DA/POSTCARDS 126.000.68.595.61.41.00 47.6£ Page: 6 Packet Pg. 83 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 7 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ E21 DA/POSTCARDS N c 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 30.0� HEADSETS/W EBCAM 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 175.4 , Q- 8559 PECK CC 8559 07-06-22 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FC 3 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 139.9! c jUGGERNAUTCASE.COM 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 159.9E Y RAYALLEN MANUFACTURING w 001.000.41.521.26.35.00 691.6E u SHREDDING E 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 25.0E 2 BOOTS FOR OFFICER BROWN 4- 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 224.3, c FINANCE CHARGE DUE TO INVOIC > 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 4.61 0 CL PLANNER INSERT Q- Q 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 38.3' BATTERIES N 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 N 229.6, cN TACTICAL TAILOR INC N ti 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 221.0, ZAPPOS - BURKLANE 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 193.3, 3 5.11 TACTICAL c 001.000.41.521.30.24.00 68.5' E AMAZON SUPPLIES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 64.1 � cu AMAZON - SUPPLIES Q 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 58.4 FITFLOPU.S. 001.000.41.521.80.24.00 79.5' VIVO BAREFOOT Page: 7 Packet Pg. 84 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 8 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 224.3: TRACKER FOREST >% 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 224.3, AMAZON - SUPPLIES a 001.000.41.521.70.35.00 13.2: a' UPS 3 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 13.8� c 8559 PECK CC 8559 07-06-22 REFUND M CREDIT FOR ORDER NOT SENT -1 � 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 -210.& w 9010 SPEER CC 9010 07-06-22 U BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 1 E 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 273.4'. 2 BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 2 ,- 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 107.1', c BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 3 > 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 20.6£ " BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 4 CL a 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 25.1 f Q BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 5 N 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 12.9 1 N BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 6 N ti 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 289.8' BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 7 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 26.7'. 3 BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 8 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 75.3 BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 9 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 25.1'. c BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 10 Q 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 64.8f BIKE UNIT SUPPLIES PT. 11 001.000.41.521.30.31.00 636.0 9573 DUO, DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATIC Page: 8 Packet Pg. 85 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.3.b Page: 9 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 7222022 7/22/2022 062693 US BANK (Continued) ^ ENOM Domain registration - N c 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 97.5( m Duo Security MFA monthly qty 100- 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 300.0( Q- 9573 LODGING CREDIT Austin Marriott - lodging at GFOA 3 001.000.31.514.20.43.00 -1.3( 9644 OXG CC JUNE 2022 USPS PASSPORT POSTAGE � 001.000.23.512.51.42.00 35.8( aUi BID-9798 BID/ED! CREDIT CARD JUNE 2022 U BID/Ed! - Sticker Mule Lovin' Summei E 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 693.9z 2 BID/Ed! - Amazon Printing Supplies ,- 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 107.0( c BID/Ed! - My Edmonds News April Cc > 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 55.0( L- BID/Ed! - Uline Poster Tubes CL a 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 74.5� Q BID/Ed! - Branding Iron Lovin' Summi N 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 84.3' N BID/Ed! - Facebook Ads (Features & N 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 ti 490.5£ BID/Ed! - My Edmonds News June C( 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 55.0( 3 BID/Ed! - Zoom July Subscription 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 16.5( Total: 28,162.0E 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total : c� 28,162.0E Q 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 28,162.0( Page: 9 Packet Pg. 86 vchlist 07/22/2022 4:55:13PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 7.3.b Page: 10 Amoun Page: 10 Packet Pg. 87 7.3.c vchlist 07/27/2022 1:26:07PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 7272022 7/27/2022 078787 FW WAAURORA MARKETPLACE LLC RD07151037 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Page PO # Description/Account Amoun TENANT#861907 LEASE#90097002 c Hwy 99 Neighborhood City Hall- E 001.000.60.557.20.45.00 4,453.8£ Total : 4,453.81 0 L Bank total : 4,453.81 3 Total vouchers : 4,453.81 M U aD t U E 2 U 4- 0 I� N N N f` O d L 3 r c m E U �a a Page: 1 Packet Pg. 88 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Protect Title 175th St. SW Slope StabilizatioGA 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project e Pm 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement A�affic Calmi� 2019 Utility Rate & GFC UpdE r019 Waterline Overlay Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number E21FB c560 EBGA = EBFQ EBJA E8,113 c516 SWR c523 WTR s020 UTILITIES i043 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 1020 Guardrail Installations ESM6 ST 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 STR E0DB STR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STR affic Calmi EOAC 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades E0A13 i047 STR 2020 Waterline Overlay 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 STR 1C STR 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i062 STR 2021 Sewer E21 CC SWR 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 STM 2021 Traffic Calming i056 STFA 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR kQ22 Guardrail Program C i073 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 STR bL i072 STR 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 STR 22 Signal Upgrade 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 STR ro-22 Traffic Calming Program E22AB 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES k022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB K064 STR 2023 Overlay Program _ E23CA i074 STR 2023 Sew r Pr E23CC i076 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM 023 Waterline Overt o 220th Adaptive 6th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) EBAB i028 STR ui c m E M a L c M U) m z E M 0 0 0 a a Q Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 89 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Engineering Proiect Project Title Proiect Accounting Number Number 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 76th Ave W at 212th S�Intersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th aCurb Ramp 7.3.d Funding STR E1CA c368 STR EBCC i031 STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 STR allinger Regional Facility Pre -Design c E E Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 STR a Ltywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III ;v Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 STR c Protected/Pe rr psive E6AB Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 PRK 0 St. Utility Replacement Street Stormwater Pump Station Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project Elm St. Waterline Replacement Ww—ay Walkway 9th Ave Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalizati Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th m z Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR 0 E4MB c443 FAC 0 a a E21JB c561 WTR a 1DA TR N ESKA c473 WTR 00 N Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) Lake Ballinger Associated Projects Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study = Mlle Creek Restoration Minor Sidewalk Program PDES (Students Saving Salmon) Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update 1VD Slope Repair & Stabilization Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements r Perrinville Creek Recovery Stu Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project Water Utility Replace Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project E22CE i067 STR E4FD c436 STM WR E4GC c461 SWR B aW So E6DD i017 STR E7FG 11mo EONA s025 GF m105 XSTM E20FC c552 STM STM E22GA c566 SW R E21JA c558 WTR EOFB c547 STM Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 90 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Protect Title Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project I Sewer Replace Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project Engineerinq Proiect Number F21FD Protect Accounting Funding Number c563 E22FA c567 STM OG E21 GA c559 SW R W Concrete Regrade & Drainage Sou Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21GB c562 SWR c m eaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA STM E a SR 104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th_ E22CG i069 STR L SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES c Emwater AL AL E6FD Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 STR 0 nds reserve Policies Study s029 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 PRK o Eaterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 PRK Q. a Pillow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration 47Fc435 WTM Q Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades Yost Park Infiltration Facility EOJB s026 WTR E22JB m160 WTR E21 FA c556 PRK Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 91 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Protect Title L020 Guardrail Installations 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades 2020 Overlay Program 020 Waterline Overlay 2020 Pedestrian Task Force 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number EOAA EOAB i047 STIR EM i048 STIR JS EOCA i042 STIR HIM,-. EODA s024 STIR c E 010 i049 STR M Q. EODC i050 STR L_ EOFA , c546 STM 3 c Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project E0F13 c547 STM al Sewer Replace iA Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 WTR 0 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Civic Center Playfield (Design) livic Center Playfield (Construction) E EOMA c536 PRK o EOMA c551 - f E 0 Official Street Map &Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GFCL a F6th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 1 CA= c368 STIRa Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 STIR N 76th Ave Overlay (196th # N SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 STIR Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction'Vprovements c552 2021 Traffic Calming E21AA i056 STIR kQ21 Guardrail Installations 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 STIR 2021 Waterline Overlav Progra E21 CB 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 SWR Stormwater Overlay Program Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 STIR F021 Pedestrian Task Force Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 PRK 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization M c560 JKSTM Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM Phase 3 Storm Repla Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 STM Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c559 HIM Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SWR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project MIEWW Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 92 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) 7.3.d Protect Title Elm St. Waterline Replacement 2022 Signal Upgrades 2022 Traffic Calming Program 2022 Guardrail Progrw 2022 Overlay Program 2022 Waterline Overlay Program 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program �022 Stormwater Overlay Program Engineerinq Proiect Number E21JB Protect Accounting Funding Number c561 WTR E22AA i070 STIR E22AB i071 STIR E22AC E22CA i063 STIR c E22CB i064 E22CC i065 STIR co a E22CD �0 TQ I.3v Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 STIR wy 99 Revitalizatig0 Stage 4 (224th-220th) S c SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 STIR 22 Pedestrian Safety Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration z E22FA c567 STM E E22FB 0 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 SWR Lhase 13 Waterline Replacement Project r c565 W 0 a a Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR a �s res Gies E22NA UTILITIES N 2022 Utilitv Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES N 23 Overlay Progra 2023 Waterline Overlay Program 2023 Sewer Overlay Program 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program Will &reek Daylighting/&onds Marsh Restoration Lake Ballinger Associated Projects �et Stormw Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab' Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating standard Details Updates' Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization otected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion Minor Sidewalk Program tormwater Comp pdate Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E23CB i075 WTR E23CC MorWR E23CD i077 STM STM E4FD c436 STM STM E4GC c461 SWR EW E5GB s011 SWR E51KA c473 WTR solo UTILITIES E6AA s014 STIR E6DD i017 STIR E6GB c488 SWR Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 93 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Engineering Protect Protect Title Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Ltywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM NPDE Saving Salmon) 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR aterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 PRK c E aterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design m103 a 220th Adaptive E8AB i028 STIR L_ 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements E8CA , i029 STR 3 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th E8CC i031 STIR c Ramps E8DB STIR m 2019 Storm Maintenance Project E8FC c525 STM 0 019 Sewerline Replacement Project E8GA SWR E 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement E8JA c523 WTR o 1019 Utility Rate & GFC Update UTILITIES 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 STIR STIR a a 019 Waterline Overlav WTR Q Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 STIR N Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9FA s022 STM E9MA c502 FAC Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 94 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.3.d Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1CA c368 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E41FE c455 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Funding STM STIR STIR STM STM FAC STM SWR WTR WTR SWR PRK WTR FAC SWR WTR STM PRK PRK STM STM SWR WTR PRK STM PRK WTR SWR STM WTR SWR STM STM WTR SWR STM STIR ZA Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 95 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.3.d Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 CB i059 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 Funding STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR SWR STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ZA Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 96 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.3.d Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SW R 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 STM Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 PRK OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB s0l l SWR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 STR Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 STM 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 STM 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STR Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GF Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES ZA Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 97 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.3.d Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1 CA c368 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Funding FAC FAC GF PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ZA Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 98 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.3.d Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Number Number Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E91DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive Systems (136th-226th) E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Funding STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR ZA Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 99 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.3.d Engineering Project Protect Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 SW R 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SW R Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB s011 SWR Standard Details Updates ESNA s010 UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR ZA Revised 6/29/2022 Packet Pg. 100 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Police Officer Lateral Hiring Inventive MOU Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: Human Resources Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson Background/History Due to the difficulty in hiring police officers being experienced across our state, many agencies have put in place hiring bonus for newly hired later police officers. Lateral officers have already been through the Washington State Basic Law Enforcement Academy and have passed the field training program with their agency. In order to remain competitive with other agencies in the state a lateral hiring bonus was negotiated with the Edmonds Police Officers Association Union. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was bargained within the authority provided by City Council to the HR Director. Staff Recommendation Approve the attached MOU providing for a Lateral Police Officer hiring bonus. Narrative See attached MOU Attachments: Lateral Officer Hiring Bonus MOU- EPOA signed Packet Pg. 101 7.4.a MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PREMIUM HIRING BONUS PAYMENTS Amended to the AGREEMENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON and EDMONDS POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION REPRESENTING THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMISSIONED EMPLOYEES January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023 THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is supplemental to the AGREEMENT by and between the City of Edmonds (City) and the Edmonds Police Officers' Association (EPOA), representing the Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees. WHEREAS, the parties have ratified a Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) effective January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023; and WHEREAS, due to City concerns relating to the recruitment of commissioned law enforcement officers, the parties have agreed to a certain incentive payment to assist in addressing those concerns; and WHEREAS, Appendix A of the CBA addresses the compensation due to employees. It is the intention of the parties, through this MOU, to provide for the payment of a certain Premium Hiring Bonus Payment to newly hired lateral law enforcement officers; NOW THEREFORE, the City and the EPOA agree as follows: 1. Premium Hiring Bonus Payments — All newly hired law enforcement officers who meet the City definition of a Lateral law enforcement officer, and who have been hired to fill the approximately 13 currently or soon -to -be open law enforcement officer positions, shall be paid a Twenty -Five Thousand Dollar ($25,000.00) Premium Hiring Bonus. The total of all such bonuses paid by the City shall be a maximum of Three Hundred Twenty -Five _----- Packet Pg. 102 7.4.a Thousand Dollars ($325,000.00). This Premium Hiring Bonus will be paid as follows: $10,000.00 at the date of hire, $10,000.00 one year after the date of hire, and $5,000.00 two years after the date of hire. If the officer leaves City employment within two years of the date of hire, the officer must repay the City according to the following schedule: an officer who leaves within one (1) year must repay $10,000.00; an officer leaves within two (2) years must repay $10,000.00; an Officer who leaves within three (3) years must repay $5,000.00. 2. This MOU is intended to clarify the intent of the parties with regard to the above referenced payments and does not alter any of the terms of the CBA, which shall remain in full force and effect. s+- DONE this I i day of �2022. CITY OF EDMONDS Mike Nelson, Mayor EDMONDS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOC. Representing the Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees Ro s resident Packet Pg. 103 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Set Public Hearing for Street Vacation Staff Lead: Michele Szafran Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michele Szafran Background/History Kent Scudder has submitted a petition to vacate an unopened dirt alley located between C Ave. and 9th Ave. S., extending south 119 feet from the south boundary of Fir St. The City Council is required to consider street vacations in a public hearing set by resolution. Staff Recommendation Adopt the resolution in Exhibit 1 setting a public hearing for September 20, 2022. Narrative The unopened dirt alley that is subject to this application is located between C Ave. and 9th Ave. S., extending south from the south boundary of Fir St. The right-of-way is approximately 17 feet wide and approximately 119 feet long. The City of Edmonds does not have utilities located within the right-of- way. All property owners adjacent to this alley have signed the petition for street vacation. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.070, the City Council is to consider the vacation request at a public hearing set by resolution. The resolution provided in Exhibit 1 will set a public hearing date of September 20, 2022. Staff will prepare a report and recommendation for the Council's consideration at the hearing. The application materials are attached. Attachments: EXHIBIT 1-ResolutionSettingHearing EXHIBIT 2-Application EXHIBIT 3-Petition EXHIBIT 4-Legal Description & Survey EXHIBIT 5-VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT 6-Appraisal EXHIBIT 7-Survey Packet Pg. 104 8.1.a RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SETTING A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF AN UNOPENED ALLEY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY ADDRESSED AT 838 FIR STREET. WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.050 authorizes a street vacation process to be initiated by the petition of the owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has received a petition from all of the property owners abutting the unopened alley adjacent to the property addressed at 838 Fir Street; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.070 requires the city council to fix a time by resolution for public hearing on any proposed street vacation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.070 requires that such hearing occur no less than twenty days and no more than sixty days after the passage of the resolution fixing the hearing date; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington as follows: Section 1. A public hearing on the proposed street vacation shall be scheduled for September 20, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. before the Edmonds City Council. Section 2. The city clerk shall provide notice of the public hearing as required pursuant to RCW 35.79.020 and ECDC 20.70.090 to the extent that such notice requirements are applicable. RESOLVED this 2nd day of August, 2022. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. 1 APPROVED: MAYOR, MIKE NELSON Packet Pg. 105 CITY OF EDMONDS nnyst,ilaingPermit.com Land Use Application #1155861 - Fir Street Alley Vacation Applicant First Name Last Name Company Name Kent Scudder Number Street Apartment or Suite Number E-mail Address 838 Fir Street kscudder(cr_noray.net City State Zip Phone Number Extension Edmonds WA 98020 (206) 715-4329 Contractor Company Name Number Street City State Zip State License Number License Expiration Date UBI # Project Location Number Street City Zip Code County Parcel Number Associated Building Permit Number Tenant Name Additional Information (i.e. equipment location or special instructions). Work Location Unopened alley south of Fir Street between C Avenue and 9th Ave S. Property Owner First Name Last Name or Company Name Number Street City State Zip Certification Statement - The applicant states: Apartment or Suite Number Phone Number Extension E-mail Address Floor Number Suite or Room Number Apartment or Suite Number I certify that I am the owner of this property or the owner's authorized agent. If acting as an authorized agent, I further certify that I have full power and authority to file this application and to perform, on behalf of the owner, all acts required to enable the jurisdiction to process and review such application. I have furnished true and correct information. I will comply with all provisions of law and ordinance governing this type of application. If the scope of work requires a licensed contractor to perform the work, the information will be provided prior to permit issuance. Date Submitted: 6/8/2022 Submitted By: Kent Scudder a+ a Packet Pg. 106 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF EDMONDS MyBui[di ngPerrnit.com Land Use Application #1155861 - Fir Street Alley Vacation Project Contact Company Name: Name: Kent Scudder Email: kscudder@noray.net Address: 838 Fir Street Phone #: (206) 715-4329 Edmonds WA 98020 Project Type Activity Type Scope of Work New New Development Activity Project Approval Project Name: Fir Street Alley Vacation Applicat Description of Avenue lon for the vacation of the 17-foot wide and 9th Ave S. extending south 119.9 feet from l alleyrt C m thesouth boundary of the F Work: Street right-of-way. Project Details Development Type Land Use r a Packet Pg. 107 Page 2 of 2 nF r.o. 8.1. b MyBui ld i n gPermit. com Jurisdiction: Edmonds Project Name: Fir Street Alley Vacation Application ID: 1 ] 55861 Supplemental Name: Applicant Certification - Planning The applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. The property affected by the application is in the exclusive ownership of the applicant or that the application has been submitted with the consent of all owners of the affected property. I certify, under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that the information and exhibits herewith submitte are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on behalf of the owner of the subje property. I do so certify. Packet Pg. 108 8.1.b MyBui ldi ngPermit. cem .rcr of ech' Jurisdiction: Edmonds Project Name: Fir Street Alley Vacation Application ID: 1155861 Supplemental Name: Land Use Application If this is a new parcel or lot that does not yet have an address or a County tax account number, please describe the property and its location (otherwise, you may skip this question): (Not Applicable) Please describe the project and/or proposed use(s) you are seeking approval for with this application (you can upload a more detaile filelletter later in the application, as necessary): The application, in the form of a petition, seeks approval for the vacation of the 17-foot wide unopened dirt alley located between C Avenue and 9th Ave S. extending south 119.9 feet from the south boundary of the Fir Street right-of-way. Check the boxes indicating all of the related approvals you are seeking for this project (including this application). NOTE THAT A SEPARATE APPLICATION I: REQUIRED FOR EACH APPROVAL. Street Vacation an Iq O 0 N N O N Z J a c 0 r 0 0 M a� a� L in L Q �L ci a r a� fn Packet Pg. 109 8.1.c PETITION FOR STREET OR ALLEY VACATION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON We, the undersigned owners of two-thirds of the real property abutting upon that public right-of-way described below, pursuant to RCW 35.79.010, do hereby petition the City of Edmonds to vacate said public right-of-way, described as follows: THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 6, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS AND A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF FIR STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88°40'14" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS; THENCE SOUTH 0117'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 119.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 ; THENCE NORTH 88°42'57" WEST 17.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE NORTH 01 °17'03"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 119.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. all situate in the City of Edmonds, County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and request that said City Council by Resolution fix a time and place when this Petition shall be heard and determined by that authority, which time shall not be more than sixty (60) days nor less than twenty (20) days after the passage of such Resolution. These pages are a group of pages containing an identical text and prayer intended by the signers of this Petition to be presented and considered as one Petition and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Petition. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. PRAYER OF PETITION: For the vacation of the 17-foot wide unopened dirt alley extending 119.9 feet south from the Fir Street right-of-way as described in the attached Exhibit A, and as shown in the attached Exhibit B. SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS DATE %t ct, Far x evi D . 6�mwv' a d -� �• -� �I'�� j l a.� S-e�.1![s-� . P i . �� w� 5' f 3 � Orm Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 110 8.1.d Exhibit A 17-foot Alley Vacation THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 6, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS AND A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF FIR STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88°40'14" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS; THENCE SOUTH 01°17'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 119.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 88°42'57" WEST 17.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE NORTH 01 °17'03"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 119.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Packet Pg. 111 8.1.d C AVE. S r o 00- W C� err 000-900 K:cf7 T. _ �0�N0 �MM / 0 r F-I N01*17'03"E 119.90 G r; ALLEY ,- 7� r n S01 *17'03"W 119.88 col CA G < , V D J \ c� m 0 o; \ N o� C) \ .m 0 co 0 TI 00 0 Z 0 0 C/7 ; x m 30' \ �ON� 0 MM CA 0)�0 r 0 I 9TH AVE. S n : � •�• ram; frTl "Yp'••... j�l EYOR 11 .. U� O Packet Pg. 112 8.1.e i City of Edmonds VICINITY MAP 0 126.30 252.6 Feet 188.1 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is fo 2,257 p B p pp g reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTIOI LO o O N N O N Legend a Sections Boundary r- O Sections Edmonds Boundary ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIP ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLIN — <all other values, Cl) Interstate i 0 Principal Arterial C Minor Arterial; Collector L fC a� Local Street = V State Highways - <all other values> 3 d -- o 1 2 d County Boundary Parks H ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY WASHII Z _ V ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES 5; ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES Lh City of Edmonds ~ m City of Lynnwood = City of Mountlake Terrace W Unincorporated King Cc; Unincor City of Woodway N E Citv of Arlinaton: Citv of Bothell C t V R r Notes Q Packet Pg. 113 1 8.1.f ABS Valuation Robert J. Macaulay, MAI Jim E Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser 2927 Colby Avenue, Suite 100 Everett, WA 98201 425-258-2611 rmacaulay@absvaluation.com jdodae@absvaluation.corr absvaluation.com it Appraisal Report Scudder Property 838 Fir Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 FOR Kent Scudder 838 Fir Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Date of Valuation: March 7, 2022 Date of Report: March 15, 2022 ABS Valuation Job # 22-0029 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q Packet Pg. 114 8.1.f Corporate Office 419 Berkeley Avenue 2927 Colby Avenue Smith Tower Suite A Suite 100 506 2nd Avenue Fircrest, WA 98466 Everett, WA 98201 Suite 3200 253-274-0099 phone 425-258-2611 phone Seattle, WA 98104 425-252-1210fax 425-252-1210fax 206-209-3016 phone 425-252-1210fax absvaluation.com Appraisal Report March 15, 2022 Kent Scudder 838 Fir Street Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: APPRAISAL OF SCUDDER PROPERTY BEFORE AND AFTER VACATION OF AN ALLEY ADJOINING THE EAST BOUNDARY, LOCATED AT 838 FIR ST, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (Our File #22-0029). Dear Mr. Scudder: In response to your request, We have completed an appraisal of the above referenced property. The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opinion of fee simple market value before and after vacation of an alley abutting the subject property. The intended users are the client and City of Edmonds. The subject larger parcel consists of one tax parcel (006194-012-010-00), containing 0.33 acres or 14,375f SF according to Snohomish County Assessor records. The property has approximate dimensions of 119 feet by 120 feet situated 140f feet west of 9th Avenue S. The vacated alley has dimensions of 17 feet by 119.9f feet based on a survey prepared by Jouni Kalevi Paavola for a total area of 2,038f SF. The larger parcel after alley vacation will contain 16,413f SF. The larger parcel is improved with a single family residence built in 2006. The two-story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and not analyzed herein. The property is zoned RS-10, single family, 10,000 SF lots by the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. This appraisal was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Code of Professional Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. Complete descriptions of properties used for comparison are included in this report, as well as all of our analyses and conclusions. The value conclusions herein are given subject to the specific assumptions and limiting conditions stated in the Addenda of this report. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 115 8.1.f March 15, 2022 Mr. Kent Scudder Page 2 Based on our investigation and analysis of all relevant data, it is our opinion that the market value of the subject property before and after the alley vacation as of March 7, 2022 is: Market Value Before Vacation Market Value After Vacation Difference Sincerely, ABS VALUATION Robert 1. Macaulay, MAI Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser $1,000,000 $1,035,000 $35,000 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 116 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................ 1 VicinityMap........................................................................................................... 2 AerialPhotograph.................................................................................................. 3 Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 Identification of the Subject Property........................................................................4 Summary of Appraisal Problem.................................................................................4 LegalDescription....................................................................................................4 Historyand Ownership............................................................................................4 Intended Use and Users...........................................................................................4 Date of Inspection/Valuation & Owner Contact...........................................................4 Purpose of the Appraisal..........................................................................................5 PropertyRights Appraised........................................................................................5 Scopeof the Appraisal.............................................................................................5 Competency Provision.............................................................................................5 LargerParcel..........................................................................................................5 Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions....................................................6 PersonalProperty....................................................................................................6 Exposure and Marketing Periods...............................................................................6 Area/Market/Neighborhood Descriptions.............................................................. 7 Boundaries/Larger Area...........................................................................................7 Population..............................................................................................................8 Business and Economic Activity................................................................................8 Neighborhood Description...................................................................................... 14 Overview.............................................................................................................. 14 SiteData.............................................................................................................. 16 Description of the Subject Property......................................................................... 16 SurveyMap.......................................................................................................... 19 AlleyVacation Legal............................................................................................. 20 Subject Property Photographs............................................................................. 21 Highestand Best Use........................................................................................... 22 AsVacant............................................................................................................22 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page i Packet Pg. 117 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY TABLE OF CONTENTS AsImproved........................................................................................................23 PropertyValuation............................................................................................... 24 Valuation -Before Vacation...................................................................................... 24 Conclusion of Land Value....................................................................................... 28 Site Valuation After Vacation.................................................................................. 29 Summary of Site Value Before and After Street Vacation...........................................29 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions................................................................... 30 Addenda............................................................................................................... 37 Comparable Property Information...........................................................................38 ZoningMap..........................................................................................................48 Qualifications of Appraiser......................................................................................49 Qualifications of Robert J. Macaulay, MAI.................................................................50 Qualifications of Jim E. Dodge................................................................................53 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page ii Packet Pg. 118 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary Project: Scudder property - alley vacation. Ostensible Owners: Kent M. Scudder Family Trust. Client: Kent Scudder. Intended User: The intended user of this report is the client and City of Edmonds Location: The parent property has a mailing address of 838 Fir Street, Edmonds, WA 98020. Access is by 119f feet of frontage on Fir Street. Site Size: Based on Snohomish County Assessor records, the parent property contains 0.33 acres or 14,375 SF. The rectangular shaped tract has an overall downward slope to the west. Improvements: The larger parcel is improved with a single family residence built in 2006. The two-story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and not analyzed herein. Utilities: The site has utility services of electricity, telephone, natural gas, public water and sanitary sewer available along its street frontage. Zoning: The larger parcel is zoned RS-10, Single Family 10,000 SF Lots according to the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. Highest & Best Use: The parent property is located in a prime residential neighborhood. A good grid system of streets provides access to surrounding residential areas and retail/commercial services. Most probable highest and best use of the subject larger parcel as if vacant is for single family residential development. The property as improved represents highest and best use of the subject property as if vacant. Market Value: Before Street Vacation: $1,000,000 After Street Vacation: $1,035,000 Difference: $35,000 Date of Valuation: March 7, 2022 Date of Report: March 15, 2022 Appraisers: Robert J. Macaulay, MAI Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 1 Packet Pg. 119 Vicinity Map Puget at Gaspers St THE BOWL OF EDMONDS J10116 ids.-ngaton F 41 `m x 0 Edmonds Main St lb 838 Fir 5t, Edmonds, ` WA 98020 220th St sw 104 — Woodway Espe Mth St SW 1 ,tat PC\r C Co mini#yt.\ Markets - Edmonds � Q � ,od � w Q a m Kruckeberg Botanic Garden a 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY VICINITY MAP $D Lynnwood Ice Cj b.; i -.. 212th S1 SW WinCc Foods 220th St Sips { 99 Ranch Market, knce {� 7 1+ � r WhirlyBall } 7r ICostco Wholesale ht 2P4th ST .I I ECHO LAKE 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 2 Packet Pg. 120 Aerial Photograph A eN +v, SKY PW 14'� 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 3 Packet Pg. 121 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Introduction Identification of the Subject Property The subject larger parcel consists of one tax parcel located at 838 Fir Street, Edmonds, WA. The property is situated on the south side of Fir St, 140f feet west of 9th Ave S. Based on Snohomish County Assessor records the larger parcel contains 0.33 acres or 14,375± SF. The rectangular shaped tract has approximate dimensions of 100 feet by 120. Summary of Appraisal Problem The purpose of the report is to provide an opinion of the fee simple market value of the parent tract before and after vacation of the alley. The alley vacation lies along the eastern boundary of the parent tract with dimensions of 17 feet by 119.9f feet based on the provided survey. The property is zoned RS-10, single family 10,000 SF lots according to the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. Legal Description No title report was provided. The subject parent property is briefly described as Lot 10, Block 12, Yost's 1st Addition to Edmonds as recorded in Volume 8 of Plats, page 6, Snohomish County, WA. Snohomish County Tax Parcel No. is; 006194-012-010-00. History and Ownership The parent property was purchased by Statutory Warranty Deed 6/22/2017 and recorded under A.F. No. 201706280190. Transaction price was $1,585,000 for land and improvements. Intended Use and Users The intended use of this appraisal is to provide an opinion of market value before and after an alley vacation. Intended user of the report is the client, Kent Scudder and City of Edmonds. Date of Inspection/Valuation & Owner Contact The subject property was inspected by Jim Dodge on March 7, 2022 and accompanied by Kent Scudder. The effective date of this appraisal is March 7, 2022. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 4 Packet Pg. 122 SCUDDER PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Appraisal The purpose of this appraisal is to provide an opinion of the market value of the subject property before and after vacation of an adjoining alley on the eastern boundary of the larger parcel, as of March 7, 2022. Market value is defined as:1 "the amount in cash, or on terms reasonably equivalent to cash, for which in all probability the property would have sold on the effective date of the appraisal, after a reasonable exposure time on the open competitive market, from a willing and reasonably knowledgeable seller to a willing and reasonably knowledgeable buyer, with neither acting under any compulsion to buy or sell, giving due consideration to all available economic uses of the property at the time of the appraisal. " Property Rights Appraised This appraisal is of fee simple interest as encumbered by existing easements. Fee simple interest is defined as:2 Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. Scope of the Appraisal This appraisal fulfills the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. The appraisal assignment included on -site inspection of the subject parcel; evaluation of local and regional economic conditions; analysis of market supply and demand; determination of highest and best use; and preparation of value estimates by the relevant approaches to value. The scope of this appraisal involves the Sales Comparison. The Income and Cost Approaches are not relevant in valuing land only. In appraising the subject property, the appraisers did the following: • Researched CoStar, CBA and NWMLS databases • Researched ABS Valuation existing database • Confirmed all sales with buyers, sellers, their agents, and/or public records • Inspected all comparable sales • Reviewed all documents as cited throughout this report Competency Provision Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser, has previously appraised similar property and has the training and experience needed to competently complete this assignment. Larger Parcel In analyzing the subject property, the larger land in the vicinity under similar ownership. parcel must be considered. There is no other 'Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions, Page 10, Section 1.2.4 2 From The Appraisal of Real Estate, Fifteenth Edition, 2020, Appraisal Institute 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 5 Packet Pg. 123 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions Extraordinary assumption is defined as an assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, as of the effective date of the assignment results, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraisers' opinions or conclusions. Extraordinary assumptions presume as fact otherwise uncertain information about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis. No extraordinary assumption is made. Hypothetical condition is defined as a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results but is used in the analysis. Hypothetical conditions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis. No hypothetical condition is made. Hazardous Waste We have been provided no information regarding the presence or absence of hazardous waste on the subject property. This report assumes the absence of any and all hazardous waste on the subject property. If hazardous waste is found to be present on the subject property, we reserve the right to change the valuation contained in this report. Access and Utility Easements No title was provided. Review of available public records indicated there are no known access or utility easements which would adversely affect use or market value of the subject property. Personal Property There is no personal property included in our analysis. Exposure and Marketing Periods Exposure and marketing periods are the respective timeframes before and after the date of valuation that are necessary to sell the subject property at the appraised value. The two periods may differ depending upon a variety of factors, including changes in market conditions or property characteristics. The exposure and marketing periods are considered to be similar for the parent tract and concluded to be one to nine months. The global outbreak of a "novel coronavirus" (known as COVID-19) was officially declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is currently unknown what direct, or indirect, effect, if any, this event may have on the national economy, the local economy, or the market in which the subject property is located. The reader is cautioned and reminded that the conclusions presented in this appraisal report apply only as of the effective date(s) indicated. The appraiser makes no representation as to the effect on the subject property of this event, or any event, subsequent to the effective date of the appraisal. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 6 Packet Pg. 124 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Area/Market/Neighborhood Descriptions Boundaries/Larger Area The larger market area is defined as Snohomish County, located on Puget Sound in the north central portion of western Washington, between Skagit County to the north and King County to the south. Snohomish County is the third most populous county in the state behind King and Pierce counties. The county encompasses approximately 2,100 square miles, of which 43%± (to the east) includes portions of the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest and the Glacier Peak Wilderness Area. Most of the population is concentrated in the foothills of the Cascades and the Puget Sound lowlands. The Puget Sound region has emerged as an area not only known for Boeing, but also as a global center for high technology. Seattle, the "Emerald City," and the centerpiece of Puget Sound, continues to be ranked as one of the most desirable cities in which to live and do business. The region has a solid economic base, which continues to keep pace with growth in high-tech industries and with development throughout the Pacific Rim. However, with all the attention and growth come the typical problems of congestion, environmental contamination, and depletion of natural resources. Puget Sound, like most metropolitan areas, is squarely facing the challenge of striking a balance between economic growth and the preservation of its quality of life. The Puget Sound basin is a major lowland area located between the Olympic and Cascade mountain ranges in northwest Washington State. The area is defined by the Puget Sound, a major inland body of saltwater lying between the two mountain ranges and connected to the Pacific Ocean via the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The Puget Sound basin incorporates four counties: King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap. The city of Seattle, recognized as the hub of the Puget Sound region, is located in King County on the east side of Puget Sound. Pierce County is adjacent to the south of King County; Snohomish County is adjacent to King County to the north; and Kitsap County is located directly west of King County across Puget Sound. The Puget Sound region offers diverse economic opportunities and the best of social, governmental, and health services. The area also boasts a rich array of cultural, entertainment, and recreational opportunities. The city of Seattle has a professional ballet, opera, and symphony and several live theatrical companies. Public and private joint ventures were successful in constructing Safeco Field and Century Link Field providing new homes for professional baseball, football, and soccer teams which continue to shape the "SODO" neighborhood, south of Seattle's Central Business District (CBD). The varied topography of the region offers outdoor activities ranging from boating to snow skiing and other mountain sports. With Puget Sound as a centerpiece, the region is one of the premiere recreational boating areas in the country. Both the Cascade and Olympic Mountains offer countless recreational activities in settings ranging from rainforests to marine vistas to rugged volcanic peaks. Mount Rainier, a classically cone -shaped, dormant volcano, is a trademark visible throughout the Puget Sound region. The region supports several state universities and colleges, and numerous private and community colleges. The University of Washington, founded in 1851 and located in Seattle, 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 7 Packet Pg. 125 8.1.f is one of the largest universities respected and productive research for achievements in fields such as 25 years or older hold a Bachelor' nation for higher education. SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS on the West Coast. It is also one of the most highly centers in the country, garnering international attention medicine and physics. Thirty percent of state residents Degree or higher, ranking Washington State 11t" in the Historically, the Puget Sound region has received a great deal of favorable publicity on a national level. Magazine, radio, and television stories have highlighted the vitality of the Northwest and its exceptional quality of life. For the last 20 years, the region experienced a large in -migration of business and population, the result of which has been tremendous growth and consequentially congestion and higher real estate prices. After a downturn in the local economy following the September 2001 tragedies, the region rebounded to pre-9/11 economic and employment numbers with solid growth in jobs, per capita income and retail sales. Most local forecasters predict another recovery from the recent recession at a pace similar to that of the nation. Population King, Pierce, Kitsap and Snohomish counties are the most populated counties within Washington State, as of April 2020, these counties contained 55%± of the state's total population. The region's annual population double-digit growth rate of the 1990's has cooled since the turn of the century. Driving this trend was a slowdown, then recession, in the region's economy primarily due to the burst of the tech bubble in early 2000 and subsequent job losses in the technology and aerospace sectors. Prior to 2000, about two-thirds of the state population growth came from persons moving to Washington — attracted by the state's good employment climate relative to nearby states and the nation as a whole. Since 2000, that number has fluctuated from between 39% in 2003 & 2010, 65% in 2006 & 2007 and a high of 76% for 2019 of net in -migration. Population Growth y 010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 a King County 1,931,249 2,052,800 2,105,100 2,153,700 2,190,200 2,226,300 2,260,800 2,293,300 Q Snohomish County 713,335 757,600 772,860 789,400 805,120 818,700 830,500 844,400 t— Pierce County 795,225 830,120 844,490 859,400 872,220 888,300 900,700 917,100 00 Kitsap County 251,133 258,200 262,590 264,300 267,120 270,100 272,200 275,600 X w Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management, April 2021 c a� E t v Business and Economic Activity a Overview The economic base of the state of Washington is anchored in lumber and wood products, aircraft manufacturing, high technology, agriculture, and marine -based industries. Puget Sound has also established itself as a major shipping and distribution center whose importance grows with the continued development of the Pacific Rim. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 8 Packet Pg. 126 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS In the Puget Sound metropolitan area, aircraft manufacturing by the Boeing Company is most important, but is slowly becoming less of a factor, due to the diversification of the regional economy through an increase in high technology companies. Microsoft has grown to be just as important to Seattle employment as Boeing. In addition to Microsoft the region is also headquarters to several top U.S. companies, including Weyerhaeuser, Paccar, Burlington Resources, Nordstrom, Safeco, Starbucks, Alaska Airlines, and Costco Wholesale. There have also been some recent additions to the area in the form of internet-based companies, such as Amazon.com, Adobe, and Real Networks. The Boeing Company In the 1970s and 1980s, the economic well-being of the region rose and fell with swings at Boeing. During the past decade, this dependency has diminished. Even with the typically fluctuating employment at Boeing, the region's total employment rose steadily upward. This constant increase can mostly be attributed to the robust growth in high technology jobs. Overall, the region's economy remains somewhat linked to Boeing's fortunes, but substantially less so than in previous decades. Though Boeing remains an important factor in the Puget Sound economy, significant changes in the health of Boeing's operations can still have a relatively large impact on the overall condition of the area, as exhibited by the layoffs that have occurred over the recent past. After the September 11th tragedy, sales of aircraft, and estimated future sales decreased dramatically. Boeing, in an attempt to balance their situation relocated their corporate headquarters to the business -friendly Chicago area and laid off 23,000 workers nationwide. In an attempt to return jobs to the Seattle area, city and state leaders won the bid in 2007 to become the final assembly center for the new Boeing 787 wide -body jet. Boeing's long term - market outlook calls for obtaining 1/2 of the sales of the anticipated 20,000 new planes that will be built over the next two decades, or an average of 500 per year. The first 787 was scheduled to enter passenger service in May 2008; however, delays pushed the first delivery date to September 2011, achieving a production rate of 10 airplanes per month in late 2012. They report Washington State aerospace employment (including contract workers) to be about 81,000 as of December 2014. High Technology High technology companies have steadily grown to become the major economic factor over the past decade. Microsoft has grown to become the largest, and most well-known, high-tech company in the region. As of December 2014, they employ 41,664 in the Puget Sound area and continue to post gains in net revenue and net income in each of the past 10 years, except for 2009. Microsoft is nearly maximized their employment at the primary Redmond Headquarters and has leased 1.3 million square feet of space in two different buildings in Bellevue, which will house 4,000 employees. Microsoft's influence in the area has brought a number of high-technology companies to the area. For the most part, all of these high-tech companies have formed 'clusters" in the region, with the largest and most highly concentrated cluster located on the "Eastside." The Eastside is the area located east of Seattle and Lake Washington, and includes the cities of Redmond, Bellevue, Bothell, Kirkland, and Issaquah. While Seattle has the second largest amount, almost 80% of high-tech jobs can be found on the Eastside, with Redmond having the most of any city in the region. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 9 Packet Pg. 127 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Most biotech jobs are located near the University of Washington, and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center on Lake Union. The clustering of these companies can be attributed to the fact that newer startup businesses and competing companies want to be located near the University and research center in order to become part of their knowledge transfer network. In addition, locating in proximity to existing successful companies provides a startup with access to a highly skilled, trained workforce. Employment Two-thirds of the total jobs in the Puget Sound region are located in King County. Roughly one-half of King County's jobs are located in the city of Seattle. Continuing growth in the region has made the political lines separating the counties increasingly artificial. The labor force often travels from Pierce and Snohomish Counties across county lines to their place of employment; only slightly more than half the King County labor force actually resides in the county. Historically on a statewide level, through 2008, the labor force and employment increased, in the face of fluctuating unemployment as is shown in the chart below. This trend reversed in 2009 as employment declined until a recovery began in 2012. Labor Force and Unemployment, Washington 2000-2022 r LaborYea •rce Employment Unemployment Rate 2000 3,059,545 2,901,730 157,815 5.2% 2001 3,038,958 2,847,661 191,297 6.3% 2002 3,083,044 2,855,168 227,876 7.4% 2003 3,126,825 2,895,331 231,494 7.4% 2004 3,196,362 2,996,430 199,932 6.3% 2005 3,263,918 3,082,806 181,112 5.5% 2006 3,323,729 3,156,030 167,699 5.0% 2007 3,403,542 3,243,709 159,833 4.7% 2008 3,479,083 3,290,590 188,493 5.4% 2009 3,535,712 3,212,466 323,246 9.1% 2010 3,510,955 3,160,567 350,388 10.0% 2011 3,461,929 3,140,993 320,936 9.3% 2012 3,471,266 3,189,356 281,910 8.1% 2013 3,463,772 3,220,512 243,260 7.0% 2014 3,489,528 3,275,766 213,762 6.1% 2015 3,546,199 3,346,373 199,826 5.6% 2016 3,635,704 3,443,952 191,752 5.3% 2017 3,719,280 3,543,908 175,372 4.7% 2018 3,790,481 3,620,266 170,215 4.5% 2019 3,912,667 3,745,751 166,916 4.3% 2020 3,912,795 3,583,955 328,840 8.4% 2021 3,893,983 3,691,775 202,208 5.2% 2022-YTD 3,961,146 3,786,484 174,662 4.4% Source: WA State Employment Security Department, March 2022 seasonally adjusted 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 10 Packet Pg. 128 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS The Covid 19 pandemic has significantly impacted employment nationwide and in the State of Washington with forced shut -downs of many businesses. Washington State Employment Security Department reported that the unemployment rate began climbing in March with a rate of 5.1%. April 2020 peaked at a rate of 16.3%. The trend has been downward since, with a rate of 4.4% in January of 2022. One cannot underestimate the local effect of military presence in our state. Joint Base Lewis-McChord employs more people that Microsoft and when combined with the Naval Shipyards in Bremerton exceeds even Boeing. It was reported that in 2009 Defense Spending in Washington was over $13 billion. Local governments contribute significantly as well. Washington State and the Puget Sound region specifically continue to draw business and labor here, perceived as a desirable place to live. Washington ranked No. 6 among a list of "The 10 States that will boom over the next 5 Years" in the November 2012 issue of Forbes, a ranking based on a study by the National Chamber Foundation. This is based on "strong aerospace and technology sectors and a vibrant export economy," according to Forbes. Other factors include productivity, livability, tax structure and regulatory burden, exports and trade and an atmosphere for fostering innovation. The magazine has previously ranked Washington as one of the five best states in America to do business. Immigration/In-migration An important contributor to growth in the Puget Sound is its advantage over California in affordability and quality of life. Puget Sound offered less expensive land and housing, and less congestion in a similar, if somewhat more rainy, West Coast setting. For the past two decades, an influx of Californians has fueled the region's escalating real estate market. As a result, while the high quality of life remains an attractive factor, land and housing prices have risen to the point that they provide an offset to that quality of life. Despite the national economic upheaval, the region continues to experience in -migration from other parts of the United States, though at much lower rates. The area is perceived as having a labor surplus. In addition, these are for the most part highly skilled, computer savvy workers. People of all education levels perceive the region as one offering many employment opportunities. The lack of employment in Alaska and the Rocky Mountain and High Plains states has contributed to the area's population increases. The Puget Sound region has also seen significant immigration from several Asian, North American, and Central American nations. Transportation Growth in the Puget Sound region has resulted in the Seattle area becoming the most traffic -congested region in the nation. To alleviate congestion, the Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) was formed and has completed construction on the first segment of a high -capacity light rail transit system between downtown Seattle and Sea-Tac Airport while continuing to study long-range growth and transportation strategies for central Puget Sound. Major expansions and revisions are either proposed, underway, or completed on Interstate 405 (I-405), the primary north/south arterial serving the Eastside's high-tech corridor, as well as to the University of Washington, just north of downtown. Sea-Tac International Airport's most recent report of statistics states it is the 16t" busiest airport in the nation for passenger service. The airport is home to twenty-five scheduled 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 11 Packet Pg. 129 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS passenger airlines that serve 75 non-stop domestic and 21 international destinations. In order to accommodate the roughly 862 aircraft operations per day, the Port of Seattle continues with its 10-year, $2 billion renovation project in order to help the airport better provide services into the next century. In addition to Sea-Tac, the region has jumbo -jet capable airports in south Seattle (Boeing Field) and Everett (Paine Field), both sites of significant Boeing activity. The Port of Seattle and Port of Tacoma are major marine shipping facilities. Together the two ports represent the country's second largest load center for containerized cargo. In order to capture their share of the future container traffic, which is projected to grow by an average of 4.1% per year annually over the next 20 years, the two ports have completed major expansions which have consumed most of the land readily available. The Port of Seattle broke its cargo volume record in 2011 with more than 2.1 million TEU's (20-foot equivalent units) due in part to its "fee free" policy and ability to receive larger ships in port. This ranked them 6t" in the country for TEU volume. Cargo handled at the Port of Seattle's seaport generates over 135,000 jobs for Washington and creates over $2 billion in annual business revenue for the region. Residential Market Trends in single-family residential development vary among the Puget Sound counties depending on factors such as: • Population (changes) • Economic activity and employment centers • Income levels • Supply of developable land • Infrastructure • Permitting processes Obviously, this is not an exhaustive list of relevant factors. However, the point to be made is that each county will grow in different ways based on specific criteria. Since the Puget Sound region is somewhat interdependent, it is logical that the smaller, less populous counties will react to factors affecting the King County market. The Growth Management Act (GMA) has been in effect since the early 1990s to further protect the unique Pacific Northwest quality of life. The GMA directs the state's most populous and fastest growing counties and their cities to prepare comprehensive land use plans that anticipate growth and impact for a 20-year horizon. The GMA policies encourage dense development within defined urban growth areas, leaving outlying areas rural with the goal of reducing urban sprawl, protecting rural areas, and more efficiently providing roads, parks, and other services. Neighborhoods with existing infrastructure and available land will provide increasingly dense housing options. Alternatively, rural developments of large tracts (5-, 10-, and 20-acre homesites) have occurred increasingly in areas that cannot meet infrastructure requirements for more dense development under the GMA. This has a direct effect on residential growth and development. Additional GMA guidelines require all jurisdictions to classify, designate, and regulate resource lands and critical areas. Regional citizens are also now faced with land development restrictions stemming from the creation of these more specific Critical Areas Ordinances, which consider wetlands, erosion, landslide, aquatic areas, and wildlife among others. These wide-ranging protections which define permitted uses, buffer areas and 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 12 Packet Pg. 130 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS setback requirements have affected businesses, developers, and homeowners alike, adding layers of study, permitting, and cost to the development process. Snohomish and Pierce Counties continue to experience single-family development and construction at significantly lower price levels than King County according to data from the Northwest Multiple Listing Service. Over the past year, King County median home price rose 8.9%; prices increased 9.2% in Snohomish County, 8.7% in Pierce County and 0.8% in Kitsap County. The November 2015 median prices ranged from a high of $479,000 in King County to a low of $245,000 in Kitsap County. Economic Forecast Puget Sound Economic Forecaster utilizes a housing market index comprised of three indicators: closed home sales, average real home price and average time on the market. Between the first and second quarters of 2008, all 3 components worked to pull the composite index down, for the first time in several years. That drop marked the end of the regional housing bubble and confirmed that a recession was underway, followed by falling home prices, massive losses in the stock market and a sluggish increase in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Many economists now see mid-2009 as the low point of the recession, and indeed recent information shows U.S Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has advanced without interruption since mid-2009, albeit at rates less than 3%. However, employment actually fell in 2009 and 2010 before finally adding jobs in 2011 with unemployment slowly increasing into 2016. The Forecaster economists remain modestly optimistic in their national predictions of a slow and steady recovery of employment during the next few years. Their long-term forecast for the Puget Sound employment growth averages 1.4% over the next 10-year period and 0.3% faster than the national rate. This is despite their assertion that neither Microsoft nor Boeing will contribute much to job creation, having already adjusted their local workforce to fit future needs. Many are cautiously optimistic as the employment level increases and unemployment rate declines over the next ten years. Conclusion The Puget Sound Region has experienced tremendous growth since the 1980s which has contributed to major congestion, inflated housing prices, and increased land use regulations to limit environmental deterioration. As in the 1990s and throughout the first decade of the new millennium, the challenge for the region continues to be creating a balance that will allow growth in industry while preserving the natural amenities that attracted many here in the first place. Increasingly, the various Puget Sound governments are agreeing to regional planning in order to confront the area's problems, particularly with regard to environmental and transportation issues. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 13 Packet Pg. 131 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Neighborhood Description Overview The City of Edmonds is situated on the shore of Puget Sound, midway between the cities of Seattle and Everett. The 5.679 square mile town is in the southwestern corner of Snohomish County. The principal geographic feature of Edmonds is its waterfront location and outstanding water and mountain views. The city lies generally south of 156th Street SW, west of 76th Avenue W, and north of 220th Street SW. Also included within the city limits is Stevens Memorial Hospital and to the southeast there is a small pocket of incorporated land between Highway 99, Lake Ballinger and 244th Street SW. Edmonds was established in 1890, when timber was the primary industry. The last sawmill closed in 1951 and the city is now largely residential in nature. Most of the city's commercial development is found in downtown, along the waterfront and on Edmonds Way and Highway 99. Most businesses are retail in nature and cater to the local community. Topography within the city limits is generally sloping upward from Puget Sound, leveling out onto undulating benchland. The western half of the city has good westerly views. Main east -west commercial thoroughfares include Edmonds Way (SR 104), Main Street and 196th Street SW (SR 524). Main north -south arterials include 5th Avenue, 9th Avenue and 76th Avenue W. Freeway access is good; there are interchanges approximately 1/2 mile east of the city at 220th, 236th and 244th Streets SW. Another factor which may positively affect the local economy is the Amtrak station west of downtown, which has become part of Sound Transit, a regional rail transit system. Population Population growth for Edmonds, the third largest city in Snohomish County and surrounding cities is summarized below. Population Trends Brier 6,087 6,500 6,555 6,560 6,605 6,665 6,760 6,815 Edmonds 39,709 40,490 40,900 41,260 41,820 42,170 42,470 42,780 Everett 103,019 105,800 108,300 109,800 111,200 111,800 112,700 114,700 Lynnwood 35,836 36,420 36,590 36,950 38,260 39,600 40,690 41,020 Marysville 60,020 64,140 64,940 65,900 67,040 67,820 69,180 70,040 Mill Creek 18,244 19,760 19,900 19,960 20,470 20,590 20,590 20,720 Mountlake Terrace 19,909 21,090 21,090 21,290 21,560 21,590 21,660 22,640 Snohomish County 713,335 757,600 772,860 789,400 805,120 818,700 830,500 844,400 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management, April 2021 The City of Edmonds population has increased at an annual rate 0.7 % since 2010, whereas Snohomish County has increased at 1.67%. The lower growth rate of Edmonds as compared to Snohomish County and most surrounding cities is due primarily to the absence of available vacant land. Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 14 Packet Pg. 132 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Employment The city's largest employer is Stevens Memorial Hospital, located in the 76th Ave corridor that anchors the growing medical district. The largest employment sector is retail trade and services located in the Historic downtown, Highway 99, SR 104 and waterfront areas. Ferry traffic and the resulting tourist trade are also a significant part of the local economy. Because Edmonds is mainly a bedroom community with little manufacturing base, the local economy is dependent on employment growth in Snohomish and King counties. Land Use Most of the land in Edmonds is residential in character. Residences are primarily single family, but there is a growing multi -family segment in and around downtown, most of which is condominiums. Multi -family development is also found around Stevens Memorial Hospital and along major thoroughfares. There are few manufacturing and industrial land uses in Edmonds. The largest commercial uses are neighborhood shopping centers along Edmonds Way and several office buildings in and near downtown. Most commercial development consists of small offices and shops, in keeping with the city's small town atmosphere. Edmonds is an affluent community, which is reflected in its median home sale price of $861,000±. Housing affordability is a concern. Governmental Edmonds provides a full range of services including water, sewer, garbage collection, police, fire, public transportation and primary education. Like many suburban communities in the region, Edmonds has sizable areas zoned for residential use. In compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act of 1991, the city has adopted interim urban growth boundaries and is updating its comprehensive plan. Conclusion The City of Edmonds is a medium-sized city of 42,780, situated along the Puget Sound shoreline. Because of its waterfront location and outstanding views, Edmonds is an attractive place to live and work. The desirable amenities are reflected in increasing real estate values, particularly for property with westerly marine views. This is consistent for both residential and commercial property. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 15 Packet Pg. 133 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY SITE DATA Site Data Description of the Subject Property Site The subject larger parcel is located at 838 Fir Street, Edmonds, Washington. The subject site is situated on the south side of Fir St, 140f feet west of 9th Ave S. Topography The larger parcel has an overall upward slope to the east providing good water views to the west. Access The property has 119f feet of frontage on Fir Street, a public asphalt paved minor arterial Sensitive Areas The subject property is designated a Zone X, area of minimal flood hazard by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map Number 53061C 1315 F, effective date June 19, 2020. No wetland information was provided. The appraiser reserves the right to revise the herein value conclusions upon receipt of any wetland data or delineation. Utilities The site has electrical, telephone, natural gas, public water and sanitary sewer service available at the property boundary. Zoning The subject property is zoned RS-10, single family 10,000 SF lots according to the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. Purpose of the RS-10 zone is to reserve and regulate areas for single-family residential dwellings. Permitted uses include a single family dwellings, churches, schools and public facilities. Below is a table of development standards for the RS-10 zoning designation. Standard RS-10 Minimum lot area 10,000 SF Maximum density 4.4 du's/acre Minimum lot width 75 feet Setback front 25 feet Setback rear/abuts residential 20 feet Setback side/abuts residential 10 feet Maximum lot coverage 35% Maximum building height 25 feet 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 16 Packet Pg. 134 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY SITE DATA Easements and Encumbrances No title report was provided. Review of available public records revealed no unusual easements or encumbrances that would adversely affect market value of the subject larger parcel. Assessed Value and Real Estate Taxes Below is the current assessed value and tax burden for the subject property. Assessed Value and Taxes ParcelTax . Improvements Tota1 006194-012-010-00 $835,700 $669,100 $1,504,800 $12,575.21 Site Improvements The larger parcel has good quality residential landscaping. Building Improvements The larger parcel is improved with a 3,730 SF single family residence built in 2006. The two- story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and therefore not analyzed herein. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 17 Packet Pg. 135 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY SITE DATA PLAT MAP Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 18 Packet Pg. 136 Survey Map a EL IYII s -SAY H16 � w M J O 7 98"6LL *_MLUQS 7 0$'6Ll 3,t .iL.LON IFS fA W - a - P L4�tnpa F rib G] (nu _j Ln S 'SAV D 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY PROJECT PLAN Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 19 Packet Pg. 137 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY PROJECT PLAN Alley Vacation Legal E Nbtt A 174 of Ailey Vacaflon THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS. AL`AZ�OftDING TO THE PL..A7 7HEF1E0F ACCORDEV IN VpI,UW 8 Or PuaM F�AOE 6, PICCOR05 OF $NOl"OMPSH COUNTY. WASHINGTON- MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIEED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NOftTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10_ OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS AND A POt"T ON THE SOLFfH MARGIN OF FIR STREET; THENCE $OUTH Q8"44'14" i ALONG E,AID 5QgjEH M+7WW4, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YCST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS: THENCE SOUTH 01 `17'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 119-M FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1. THENCE N FFrrH 89'42'57" WEST 17_¢0 FEET TO THE 3QVTHEP$T CORN EF1 QF $AID LQ'i 1Q; THENCE NORTH 01"17'03"EASI ALOhtG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 11e.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF 13EGI N N ING SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 20 Packet Pg. 138 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS Subject Property Photographs 1. Southerly view of alley right of way from Fir Street. 2. Looking north toward Fir Street along alley right of way. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 139 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and Best Use Highest and best use is defined as: 1 The highest and most profitable use for which the property is adaptable and needed or likely to be needed in the reasonably near future A determination of highest and best use is guided by the following parameters: 1) physically possible; 2) legally permissible; 3) financially feasible; and 4) must result in the highest value. Physically possible uses require an analysis of both the improvements (existing or proposed), as well as the underlying land. Size, topography, shape, access, soil conditions, wetlands, and utilities are all factors that can affect the development potential of a given site. With regard to the improvements, obviously, it must be physically possible to construct a building before it can be considered the highest and best use. Legally permitted uses are those which fall within current zoning laws and are permitted by all agencies having jurisdiction. These may include federal, state, and local laws; zoning; easements and deed restrictions; as well as the possibility for reasonable zoning changes and variances. The financially feasible category analyzes those uses that are physically possible, legally permitted, and which provide an adequate investor return. For income properties, this return is measured monetarily, while non -income -producing properties provide a somewhat less tangible measure of return. Risk is a primary determinant in the assessment of adequate return. Finally, the uses satisfying all of the above criteria can be analyzed. The one use providing the highest return is considered maximally productive, and thus, the highest and best use. As Vacant Physically Possible. The larger parcel as identified herein is a rectangular shaped tract containing 0.33 acres or 14,375 SF according to Snohomish County Assessor records. The site has an overall downward slope to the west providing good water views. Access is by 119f feet of frontage on Fir Street. Legally Permissible. The site is zoned single family by the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. The RS-10 designation is oriented toward single family development with churches, schools and public facilities also permitted. Minimum lot size is the designation is 10,000 SF per lot. 1 From The Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions, 2016 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 22 Packet Pg. 140 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY HIGHEST AND BEST USE Financially Feasible/Maximally Productive. The maximally productive use is that use producing the highest residual land value. Based on surrounding uses, single family zoning and market demand, the maximally productive use of the subject site is concluded to be for single family residential development. As Improved The subject larger parcel is improved with a 3,730 SF single family residence built in 2006. The two-story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and therefore not analyzed herein. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 23 Packet Pg. 141 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Property Valuation Valuation -Before Vacation The scope of the assignment is to estimate the market value of the subject property before and after vacation of an adjoining alley along the eastern boundary. Approaches Used in the Valuation Process — The valuation is obtained by the proper use of three different approaches to the value conclusion: the Cost Approach, the Income Approach, and the Sales Comparison Approach. These three approaches are different in character but, related somewhat in the known facts they require to arrive at an opinion of value from each. The final conclusion of value is derived through a correlation process in which the appraiser weighs one approach against the other to determine the relative merits of each before coming to a conclusion. The Cost Approach to Value is the process of first determining the value of the subject land, to which is added the replacement cost new of the structure, less depreciation and the cost of land improvements. The sum of the costs is the indication of value by the Cost Approach. The subject property building improvements are not affected by the street vacation and not included in the analysis. Therefore, the Cost Approach is not used. The Income Approach to Value involves the estimation of a gross economic rental, which is then processed by subtracting an estimated vacancy and credit loss and operating expenses to obtain an estimated net operating income. The net operating income is then capitalized into a value conclusion by the appropriate capitalization rate derived from the market. Land is not typically purchased based on its ability to generate an income stream. Therefore, the Income Approach is not relevant and not utilized. The Sales Comparison Approach to Value is a comparative technique which utilizes sales of comparable properties and analyzes them to determine an applicable sale price per unit to apply to the subject's underlying land. In this case, the subject will be analyzed on an overall residential site basis. Final Correlation and Conclusion of Value the various indications of value from the approaches are analyzed as to how they relate to one another, as well as to the market. The approach or approaches most appropriate are given the most consideration in arriving at a final opinion of value. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 24 Packet Pg. 142 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Site Valuation Residential land is typically purchased on an overall site basis. Based on the concluded highest and best use, we have analyzed a series of sales that reflect the market for the subject larger parcel. All sales considered comparable to the subject were utilized. Comparable sales are adjusted for variation in market conditions, location, size, useable area, zoning, topography and utilities. Comparable Land Sales Tabulation Land PriceSale per No. • . Date Sale Price Zone Subj 838 Fir St, Edmonds NA NA RS-10 14,375 NA 1 21222 Pioneer Wy N, Edmonds 8/14/20 $240,000 RS-8 10,000 $24.00 2 22521 82nd AV W, R- Edmonds 8/21/19 $310,000 8400 15,682 $19.77 3 22328 88th AV W, R- Edmonds 8/19/21 $652,000 8400 16,117 $40.45 4 131 Skyline Dr, Edmonds 8/18/20 $1,000,000 RS-12 13,939 $71.74 The following discussion of sales relates to the comparables presented in the above chart Comparable 1 is the sale of a 0.23 acre (10,019 SF) single family residential lot. Site has no street frontage and is accessed by an easement from Pioneer Way N. Property slopes upward from street grade to the west. All utilities are available from Pioneer Way, requiring extension to the property boundary. Comparable 2 is the sale of a 15,682 SF single family residential lot. Rectangular shaped site at street grade. Property was in probate. Transaction included a 1,188 SF double wide mobile home which had nominal contribution value. All utility services are available. Comparable 3 is the sale of a 16,117 SF residential homesite. A 1,304 SF residence built in 1948 contributed no value to the transaction and has since been removed. The site slopes gently upward to the west from street grade. All utilities are available. Comparable 4 is the sale of a 13,939 SF residential lot in a prestigious area of Edmonds. The corner site has excellent westerly views of Puget Sound. Level area for building site with downward slope to the west. All utilities are available. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 25 Packet Pg. 143 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Discussion of Adjustments Unadjusted sale prices range from $240,000 to $1,000,000. In comparison to the subject, the sales have been adjusted for differences in market conditions, location, and a variety of physical characteristics. Certain adjustments will be discussed in additional detail in this section. The first category of adjustments includes market conditions (time), financing, and issues relating to the interests purchased. The subsequent category of adjustments reflects the physical features and locational differences. Rights Conveyed relates to the actual interests transferred. All of the comparable sales include fee simple rights and no adjustments are necessary. Conditions of Sale reflect adjustments for sales, which occurred under unusual and specific conditions. This category is different than the adjustment for time, which will be dealt with subsequently. No adjustment is made for conditions of sale. Financing adjustments are necessary for sales that were financed with atypical terms. This includes seller financing with non -market interest rates or abnormal down payment levels; the theory being that a comparable figure for use in appraisal analysis should reflect a cash equivalent price, or a price that is in line with existing market terms at the time of sale. No adjustments are necessary. In terms of adjustment support for time (market conditions), we have reviewed the market and found that paired sales activity is limited. Average and median sale price trends of residential sales in the 730 Southwest Snohomish County area were analyzed based on data from the Northwest Multiple Listing Service. The monthly sales data is contained in the Addenda. The results summarized below are from January 2019 to January 2022 (most current available). Average Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.10% Median Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.02% The monthly upward trend is relatively similar with an average of 2.06%. The date of sale adjustment is concluded at a conservative 2.0% per month. All the sales are older transactions and adjusted upward for inferior market time. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 26 Packet Pg. 144 8.1.f Physical characteristics, including differences in the location, zoning or land use issues, are now discussed. Market data i quantitative adjustments; therefore, qualitative adjustments ar the chart as follows: SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION e size, intensity of use, and s not adequate to support necessary and reflected in Location: Factors in the location equation include the subject's regional access and proximity to major employment centers and commercial services. The subject property is situated east of downtown Edmonds in a primarily single family neighborhood. Sale 4 is located in an upscale neighborhood and considered to be superior for location. The remaining sales are considered similar to the subject site in location with no adjustment considered necessary. Size: The site size adjustment is based on the larger parcel size of 14,375 SF of land area. Typically, if all other factors are similar, a larger site will sell for more on an overall basis. Sale 1 is smaller and considered inferior on an overall basis for size. The remaining comparable sales are similar in overall size and rated similar. Site Quality: This adjustment considers the topography, shape and sensitive area impact, which combine to affect the overall site utility. Sale 1 is relatively steep with no street frontage and is rated inferior. The remaining sales are considered similar overall for shape, topography and sensitive areas with no adjustment considered necessary. Amenities: This adjustment is made for any perceived amenities, including views, waterfrontage, privacy, and atmosphere of the neighborhood. This also considers nuisances to the property (traffic noise, powerlines, etc.) that can negatively affect value. This can be a very subjective adjustment and is based on the appraiser's opinion of the amenity quality. Sales 1, 2 and 3 have no water view and are rated inferior. Sale 4 is considered similar with no adjustment made. Zoning/Entitlements: This adjustment reflects the differences in zoning and entitlements, as properties with higher density or more intense allowable uses typically sell for higher values. The comparable sales are all zoned for single family development with no adjustment for zoning made. Access/utilities: This adjustment considers visibility, quality of road access, utilities and general infrastructure available at a property. Sale 1 is accessed by easement and requires extension of utilities. Therefore, it is rated inferior. The remaining comparable sales are considered similar to the subject for developed access. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 27 Packet Pg. 145 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Following is a grid summarizing adjustment of the sales as compared to the subject property. Comparable Land Sales Adjustment Summary Sale Date NA 08/20 08/19 08/21 08/20 Sale Price NA $240,000 $310,000 $652,000 $1,000,000 Size - SF 14,375 10,000 15,682 16,117 13,939 Price/SF NA $24.00 $19.77 $40.45 $71.74 Property rights fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple Financing terms NA similar similar similar similar Sale conditions NA similar similar similar similar Market conditions-mos NA 18 30 6 18 Adjustment $86,400 $186,000 $78,240 $360,000 Adjusted sale price $326,400 $496,000 $730,240 $1,360,000 Location Avg similar similar similar superior Site size 14,375 inferior similar similar similar Site quality Avg inferior similar similar similar Amenities Avg inferior inferior inferior similar Zoning/entitlements RS-10 similar similar similar similar Access/utilities Avg inferior similar similar similar Overall Adjustment inferior inferior inferior superior Conclusion of Land Value The comparable sales adequately bracket a market value range for subject land area. Adjusted value range is $326,400 to $1,360,000 after a quantitative adjustment for date of sale. Qualitative adjustments resulted in Sale 4 being superior. The remaining sales are rated inferior to the subject larger parcel. Emphasis is placed on the upper end of the range and Sale 4. Most probable market value of the larger parcel is concluded to be $1,000,000. Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 28 Packet Pg. 146 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Site Valuation After Vacation The street vacation is for a 17 foot by 119.9± foot (2,038f SF) strip of an alley right of way adjacent on the east boundary of the subject parent parcel. The subject tract contains 16,413 SF of land area after the street vacation. The additional land area is inadequate to provide an additional building site. The alley vacation strip lies 4 plus feet above the original larger parcel in elevation and contributes limited benefit to physical use of the larger parcel. Primary utility of the alley strip is to contribute a buffer from adjoining development to the east. Highest and best use as if vacant and as improved are unchanged from the before situation. Market data research indicates no measurable difference in residential homesite values based on the nominal size difference of the subject site before and after the street vacation. The before alley vacation value conclusion was $1,000,000 or $69.57/SF. Contribution value of the alley vacation is considered nominal and estimated at 25% of $69.57/SF or $17.39/SF. Contribution value of the 2,038 SF alley vacation strip is concluded to be $35,000 (2,038 SF @ $17.39/SF). Total market value of the subject site after the alley vacation totals $1,035,000. Summary of Site Value Before and After Street Vacation Based on the preceding discussion and in consideration of property rights to be acquired, below is a summary of market value before and after the street vacation. Market Value Before Vacation $1,000,000 Market Value After Vacation $1,035,000 Difference $35,000 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 29 Packet Pg. 147 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This appraisal is subject to the following limiting conditions: 1. The legal description - if furnished to us - is assumed to be correct. 2. No responsibility is assumed for legal matters, questions of survey or title, soil or subsoil conditions, engineering, availability or capacity of utilities, or other similar technical matters. The appraisal does not constitute a survey of the property appraised. All existing liens and encumbrances have been disregarded and the property is appraised as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management unless otherwise noted. 3. Unless otherwise noted, the appraisal will value the property as though free of contamination. ABS Valuation will conduct no hazardous materials or contamination inspection of any kind. It is recommended that the client hire an expert if the presence of hazardous materials or contamination poses any concern. 4. The stamps and/or consideration placed on deeds used to indicate sales are in correct relationship to the actual dollar amount of the transaction. 5. Unless otherwise noted, it is assumed there are no encroachments, zoning violations or restrictions existing in the subject property. 6. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this appraisal unless previous arrangements have been made. 7. Unless expressly specified in the engagement letter, the fee for this appraisal does not include the attendance or giving of testimony by Appraiser at any court, regulatory, or other proceedings, or any conferences or other work in preparation for such proceeding. If any partner or employee of ABS Valuation is asked or required to appear and/or testify at any deposition, trial, or other proceeding about the preparation, conclusions or any other aspect of this assignment, client shall compensate Appraiser for the time spent by the partner or employee in appearing and/or testifying and in preparing to testify according to the Appraiser's then current hourly rate plus reimbursement of expenses. 8. The values for land and/or improvements, as contained in this report, are constituent parts of the total value reported and neither is (or are) to be used in making a summation appraisal of a combination of values created by another appraiser. Either is invalidated if so used. 9. The dates of value to which the opinions expressed in this report apply are set forth in this report. We assume no responsibility for economic or physical factors occurring at some point at a later date, which may affect the opinions stated herein. The forecasts, projections, or operating estimates contained herein are based on current market conditions and anticipated short-term supply and demand factors and are subject to change with future conditions. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 30 Packet Pg. 148 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 10. The sketches, maps, plats and exhibits in this report are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraiser has made no survey of the property and assumed no responsibility in connection with such matters. 11. The information estimates and opinions, which were obtained from sources outside of this office, are considered reliable. However, no liability for them can be assumed by the appraiser. 12. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. Neither all, nor any part of the content of the report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to property value, the identity of the appraisers, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organization or the firm with which the appraisers are connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without prior written consent and approval. 13. No claim is intended to be expressed for matters of expertise that would require specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that ordinarily employed by real estate appraisers. We claim no expertise in areas such as, but not limited to, legal, survey, structural, environmental, pest control, mechanical, etc. 14. This appraisal was prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the client for the function outlined herein. Any party who is not the client or intended user identified in the appraisal or engagement letter is not entitled to rely upon the contents of the appraisal without express written consent of ABS Valuation and Client. The Client shall not include partners, affiliates, or relatives of the party addressed herein. The appraiser assumes no obligation, liability or accountability to any third party. 15. Distribution of this report is at the sole discretion of the client, but third -parties not listed as an intended user on the face of the appraisal or the engagement letter may not rely upon the contents of the appraisal. In no event shall client give a third -party a partial copy of the appraisal report. We will make no distribution of the report without the specific direction of the client. 16. This appraisal shall be used only for the function outlined herein, unless expressly authorized by ABS Valuation. 17. This appraisal shall be considered in its entirety. No part thereof shall be used separately or out of context. 18. Unless otherwise noted in the body of this report, this appraisal assumes that the subject property does not fall within the areas where mandatory flood insurance is effective. Unless otherwise noted, we have not completed, nor have we contracted to have completed an investigation to identify and/or quantify the presence of non -tidal wetland conditions on the subject property. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this determination. 19. The flood maps are not site specific. We are not qualified to confirm the location of the subject property in relation to flood hazard areas based on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or other surveying techniques. It is recommended that the 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 31 Packet Pg. 149 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS client obtain a confirmation of the subject's flood zone classification from a licensed surveyor. 20.If the appraisal is for mortgage loan purposes 1) we assume satisfactory completion of improvements if construction is not complete, 2) no consideration has been given for rent loss during rent -up unless noted in the body of this report, and 3) occupancy at levels consistent with our "Income and Expense Projection" are anticipated. 21.It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures which would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for engineering which may be required to discover them. 22.Our inspection included an observation of the land and improvements thereon only. It was not possible to observe conditions beneath the soil or hidden structural components within the improvements. We inspected the buildings involved, and reported damage (if any) by termites, dry rot, wet rot, or other infestations as a matter of information, and no guarantee of the amount or degree of damage (if any) is implied. Condition of heating, cooling, ventilation, electrical and plumbing equipment is considered to be commensurate with the condition of the balance of the improvements unless otherwise stated. Should the client have concerns in these areas, it is the client's responsibility to order the appropriate inspections. The appraiser does not have the skill or expertise to make such inspections and assumes no responsibility for these items. 23. This appraisal does not guarantee compliance with building code and life safety code requirements of the local jurisdiction. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, certificates of occupancy or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or national governmental or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value conclusion contained in this report is based unless specifically stated to the contrary. 24. When possible, we have relied upon building measurements provided by the client, owner, or associated agents of these parties. In the absence of a detailed rent roll, reliable public records, or "as -built" plans provided to us, we have relied upon our own measurements of the subject improvements. We follow typical appraisal industry methods; however, we recognize that some factors may limit our ability to obtain accurate measurements including, but not limited to, property access on the day of inspection, basements, fenced/gated areas, grade elevations, greenery/shrubbery, uneven surfaces, multiple story structures, obtuse or acute wall angles, immobile obstructions, etc. Professional building area measurements of the quality, level of detail, or accuracy of professional measurement services are beyond the scope of this appraisal assignment. 25. We have attempted to reconcile sources of data discovered or provided during the appraisal process, including assessment department data. Ultimately, the measurements that are deemed by us to be the most accurate and/or reliable are used within this report. While the measurements and any accompanying sketches are considered to be reasonably accurate and reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Should the client desire a greater level of measuring detail, they are urged to retain the measurement services of a qualified professional (space planner, architect or building engineer). We reserve the right to use an alternative source of 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 32 Packet Pg. 150 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS building size and amend the analysis, narrative and concluded values (at additional cost) should this alternative measurement source reflect or reveal substantial differences with the measurements used within the report. 26.In the absence of being provided with a detailed land survey, we have used assessment department data to ascertain the physical dimensions and acreage of the property. Should a survey prove this information to be inaccurate, we reserve the right to amend this appraisal (at additional cost) if substantial differences are discovered. 27.If only preliminary plans and specifications were available for use in the preparation of this appraisal, then this appraisal is subject to a review of the final plans and specifications when available (at additional cost) and we reserve the right to amend this appraisal if substantial differences are discovered. 28. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the value conclusion is predicated on the assumption that the property is free of contamination, environmental impairment or hazardous materials. Unless otherwise stated, the existence of hazardous material was not observed by the appraiser and the appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required for discovery. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 29. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey of the property to determine if it is in conformity with the various requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with an analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this could have a negative effect on the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible noncompliance with the requirements of ADA in developing an opinion of value. 30. This appraisal applies to the land and building improvements only. The value of trade fixtures, furnishings, and other equipment, or subsurface rights (minerals, gas, and oil) were not considered in this appraisal unless specifically stated to the contrary. 31. No changes in any federal, state or local laws, regulations or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated, unless specifically stated to the contrary. 32. Any income and expense estimates contained in the appraisal report are used only for the purpose of estimating value and do not constitute prediction of future operating results. Furthermore, it is inevitable that some assumptions will not materialize and that unanticipated events may occur that will likely affect actual performance. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 33 Packet Pg. 151 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 33. Any estimate of insurable value, if included within the scope of work and presented herein, is based upon figures developed consistent with industry practices. However, actual local and regional construction costs may vary significantly from our estimate and individual insurance policies and underwriters have varied specifications, exclusions, and non -insurable items. As such, we strongly recommend that the Client obtain estimates from professionals experienced in establishing insurance coverage. This analysis should not be relied upon to determine insurance coverage and we make no warranties regarding the accuracy of this estimate. 34. The data gathered in the course of this assignment (except data furnished by the Client) shall remain the property of the Appraiser. The appraiser will not violate the confidential nature of the appraiser -client relationship by improperly disclosing any confidential information furnished to the appraiser. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Appraiser is authorized by the client to disclose all or any portion of the appraisal and related appraisal data to appropriate representatives of the Appraisal Institute if such disclosure is required to enable the appraiser to comply with the Bylaws and Regulations of such Institute now or hereafter in effect. 35. You and ABS Valuation both agree that any dispute over matters in excess of $5,000 will be submitted for resolution by arbitration. This includes fee disputes and any claim of malpractice. The arbitrator shall be mutually selected. If ABS Valuation and the client cannot agree on the arbitrator, the presiding head of the Local County Mediation & Arbitration panel shall select the arbitrator. Such arbitration shall be binding and final. In agreeing to arbitration, we both acknowledge that, by agreeing to binding arbitration, each of us is giving up the right to have the dispute decided in a court of law before a judge or jury. In the event that the client, or any other party, makes a claim against ABS Valuation or any of its employees in connections with or in any way relating to this assignment, the maximum damages recoverable by such claimant shall be the amount actually received by ABS Valuation for this assignment, and under no circumstances shall any claim for consequential damages be made. 36. ABS Valuation shall have no obligation, liability, or accountability to any third party. Any party who is not the "client" or intended user identified on the face of the appraisal or in the engagement letter is not entitled to rely upon the contents of the appraisal without the express written consent of ABS Valuation. 'Client" shall not include partners, affiliates, or relatives of the party named in the engagement letter. Client shall hold ABS Valuation and its employees harmless in the event of any lawsuit brought by any third party, lender, partner, or part-owner in any form of ownership or any other party as a result of this assignment. The client also agrees that in case of lawsuit arising from or in any way involving these appraisal services, client will hold ABS Valuation harmless from and against any liability, loss, cost, or expense incurred or suffered by ABS Valuation in such action, regardless of its outcome. 37. Acceptance and/or use of this appraisal report constitutes acceptance of the foregoing general assumptions and limiting conditions. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 34 Packet Pg. 152 SCUDDER PROPERTY CERTIFICATION Certification I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: • the statements of fact contained in this report and upon which the opinions herein are based are true and correct • the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions • I have no interest, either present or prospective in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. • I have no bias with respect to the subject property, or to the parties involved. • My engagement in this assignment was in no way contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results, nor was it based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific value, or the approval of a loan • My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal • My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed in conformity with requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Regulations for Federally Assisted Programs (The Uniform Act) . • I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. • I have made a personal inspection of the subject property, and the owner or owner's representative was given the opportunity to accompany the appraiser on the property inspection • No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification, with the exception of the person(s) shown on additional certification(s), if enclosed. • This report was prepared in compliance with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute • Use of this report is subject to the Appraisal Institute's right to review the appraisal report • As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute for Designated Members • In my opinion, the market value of the subject property is: Market Value Before Vacation $1,000,000 Market Value After Vacation $1,035,000 Difference $35,000 Date of Value: March 7, 2022 Robert J. Macaulay, MAI WA State Certified- General Appraiser No. 1100517 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 35 Packet Pg. 153 SCUDDER PROPERTY CERTIFICATION Certification I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: • the statements of fact contained in this report and upon which the opinions herein are based are true and correct • the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions • I have no interest, either present or prospective in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. • I have no bias with respect to the subject property, or to the parties involved. • My engagement in this assignment was in no way contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results, nor was it based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific value, or the approval of a loan • My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal • My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed in conformity with requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Regulations for Federally Assisted Programs (The Uniform Act) . • I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. • I have made a personal inspection of the subject property, and the owner or owner's representative was given the opportunity to accompany the appraiser on the property inspection • No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification, with the exception of the person(s) shown on additional certification(s), if enclosed. • This report was prepared in compliance with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute • Use of this report is subject to the Appraisal Institute's right to review the appraisal report • As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute for Practicing Affiliates • In my opinion, the market value of the subject property is: Market Value Before Vacation $1,000,000 Market Value After Vacation $1,035,000 Difference $35,000 Date of Value: March 7, 2022 � 7, d4, _/ Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser WA State Certified- General Appraiser No. 1100557 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 36 Packet Pg. 154 SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Addenda Comparable Property Information NWMLS Market Trend Data Zoning Map Qualifications 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 37 Packet Pg. 155 Comparable Property Information n z C 33ppm .31 THE BOWL. OF EDMONOS a . Kingston �� Brackelt's rt Landing North C3 � Edmonds Main s� Daylan 131 S., R Walnut St rina Edrnond5 p h Pa�c City Park I PINE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD 2201h St $W 10S � a K y�r k k ood a C Pee Community Markets - Edmonds _2 J � 1 5 SHERWOOD FOREST 9 $GWdOiA IvaY 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA City Municip Buirgef Kil 212ih St SW D 15 anch 1 5 � Esperance 228th Sk sw Comparable Land Sales Map 10S WhirlyBall� Safeawa Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 156 LAND SALE NO. 1 21222 Pioneer Wy N Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 21222 Pioneer Wy'N 10993599 Residential (Single -Family) Single family lot 21222 Pioneer Way N Edmonds, Washington 980 Snohomish Westerly of Pioneer Way, 003736-005-005-04 47.807179 - 122.352712 Mariah Sebastien Oregon Excellence, LLC 08-12-2020 08-14-2020 $240,000 $240,000 Statutory Warranty Deed 202008140728 Fee Simple 13 days Jim Dodge Chris Pollock, agent 03-02-2022 Land 26 north of Shell Valley Rd. 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 157 Land Data Land Size 0.23 acres or 10,019 SF Topography Sloping Front Footage None Utilities All available Access Easement to Pioneer Way N. Shape Irregular Grade At or above street grade Access Easement to Pioneer Way N. In Flood Plain? No Zoning Code RS-8, Single Family 8,000 SF Lots, Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $1,043,478 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $23.95 per SF SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA City of Edmonds 8.1.f Property Remarks Sale of a 0.23 acre (10,019 SF) single family residential lot. Site has no street frontage and is accessed by an easement from Pioneer Way N. Property slopes upward from street grade to the west. Comp ID No. 10993599 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 158 LAND SALE NO. 2 22521 82nd AV W Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Section, Township, Range Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 22521 82nd Av W 10993600 Residential (Single -Family) Land Single Family lot 22521 82nd Ave W Edmonds, Washington 98026 Snohomish East side of 82nd Ave W, 72f feet north of 226th St SW 30-27-4 004914-001-003-01 47.794500 - 122.343152 Estate of Timothy Gritten Timofey Karpenko 08-16-2019 08-21-2019 $310,000 $310,000 Statutory Warranty Deed 201908210281 Fee Simple 62 days Jim Dodge Michael Thornes, agent 03-02-2022 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 159 8.1.f Land Data Land Size Topography Front Footage Depth (Feet) Utilities Access Shape Grade Access In Flood Plain? Zoning Code 0.36 acres or 15,682 SF Mostly level 100.00 feet on two lane 158.00 All available 82nd Ave W Generally Rectangular At street grade 82nd Ave W No SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA paved public street R8400, Residential 1 DU/8,400 SF, Snohomish County Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $861,111 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $19.77 per SF Analysis Price/Front Foot $3,100.00 Property Remarks Sale of a 15,682 SF single family residential lot. Rectangular shaped site at street grade. Property was in probate. Transaction included a 1,188 SF double wide mobile home which had nominal contribution value. Comp ID No. 10993600 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 160 LAND SALE NO. 3 22328 88th Av W Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Section, Township, Range Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 22328 88th Av W 10993601 Residential (Single -Family) Land Single family lot 22328 88th Ave W Edmonds, Washington 98026 Snohomish Northwest corner of 88th Ave W 30-27-4 004610-007-001-02 47.796206 - 122.352327 Estate of Miriamdale Doyle Christopher & Brandon Melton 08-13-2021 08-19-2021 $652,000 $652,000 Bargain and Sale Deed 202108190671 Fee Simple 9 days Jim Dodge Dan Willner, agent 03-02-2022 and 224th St SW. 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 161 8.1.f Land Data Land Size Topography Front Footage Utilities Access Shape Grade Access In Flood Plain? Zoning Code SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 0.37 acres or 16,117 SF Mostly level 125.00 feet on 88th Ave W All available 88th Ave W Mostly Square At or above street grade 88th Ave W No R8400, Residential 1 DU/8,400 SF, Snohomish County Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $1,762,162 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $40.45 per SF Analysis Price/Front Foot $5,216.00 Property Remarks Sale of a 16,117 SF residential homesite. A 1,304 SF residence built in 1948 contributed no value to the transaction and has since been removed. Comp ID No. 10993601 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 162 LAND SALE NO. 4 131 Skyline Dr Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Section, Township, Range Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 131 Skyline Dr 10993602 Residential (Single -Family) Land Residential site 131 Skyline Dr Edmonds, Washington 98020 Snohomish Skyline Dr., 250f feet north of Main Street. 24-27-3 004230-000-053-00 47.811415 - 122.357113 Susannah Johnston Sue & Gerald King 08-20-2020 08-18-2020 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Statutory Warranty Deed 202008180370 Fee Simple 3 days Jim Dodge Terry Vehrs, agent 03-02-2022 8.1.f 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 163 8.1.f Land Data Land Size Topography Front Footage Utilities Access Shape Grade Access In Flood Plain? Zoning Code SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 0.32 acres or 13,939 SF Sloping 93.00 feet on Skyline Dr. All available Skyline Drive Irregular At or below street grade Skyline Drive No RS12, Single Family 12,000 SF Lots, City of Edmonds Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $3,125,000 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $71.74 per SF Analysis Price/Front Foot $10,752.69 Property Remarks Sale of a 13,939 SF residential lot in prestigious area of Edmonds. Site has excellent westerly view of Puget Sound. Level area for building site with downward slope to the west. Comp ID No. 10993602 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 164 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA NWMLS Market Trend Data Monthly Average Sale Price -Residential Area 730 Month 2019 2020 2021 2022 Jan $543,051 $628,297 $769,638 $965,155 Feb $615,329 $681,139 $857,260 Mar $614,136 $648,330 $816,787 Apr $617,005 $651,850 $840,410 May $629,066 $650,418 $856,550 Jun $674,838 $637,817 $895,065 Jul $626,628 $722,878 $843,363 Aug $627,955 $739,830 $886,415 Sep $623,357 $704,374 $826,058 Oct $647,327 $706,595 $890,949 Nov $602,137 $716,284 $874,254 Dec $620,549 $754,348 $942,803 Monthly Median Sale Price -Residential Area 730 Month 2019 2020 2021 2022 Jan $492,998 $575,000 $712,500 $861,000 Feb $525,000 $620,750 $750,000 Mar $542,500 $610,000 $780,500 Apr $555,000 $603,000 $775,000 May $558,750 $585,000 $825,000 Jun $596,500 $580,000 $850,000 Jul $578,250 $660,000 $780,000 Aug $553,800 $640,000 $791,250 Sep $567,500 $675,000 $780,500 Oct $568,250 $650,000 $805,000 Nov $554,000 $660,000 $815,000 Dec $559 950 $685 500 $861 865 Q Average Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.10% Median Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.02% 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 165 ABS VALUATION SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Qualifications of Appraisers 8.1.f 0 C N N O N Z J d C O r R v R i O d L v/ L O �L 2 V 2) CU L Q Q Q W X W E Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 167 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Qualifications of Robert J. Macaulay, MAI ABS Valuation Education Bachelor of Arts in Economics, Washington State University, 1983. Professional Education Appraisal Courses: All appraisal courses required for MAI designation. Seminars and Continuing Education (abbreviated summary of coursework): • Environmental & Property Dangers • UASFLA Seminar (Yellow Book) • Introduction to Valuation for Financial Reporting • Eminent Domain and Condemnation • Evaluating Commercial Construction • The Road Less Traveled: Special Purpose Properties • The Appraiser as Expert Witness • Litigation Appraising: Specialized Topics and Applications • Appraiser Consulting: A Solutions Approach for Professionals • Subdivision Valuation Professional Affiliation Member, Appraisal Institute. Received MAI Designation in 1995. (Member No. 10,712) Approved Appraiser and Review Appraiser, Washington State Department of Transportation Member, International Right -of -Way Association Past Board of Trustees - Washington Center for Real Estate Research Appraisal Experience Principal with Macaulay & Associates. Appraisal assignments include a wide variety of commercial, industrial and residential properties for financial institutions, governmental entities, law firms, corporations and private individuals. Examples include medical and non- medical related office buildings, retail shopping centers, multifamily properties, industrial warehouses, restaurants, retail stores, mobile home parks, service stations, single-family subdivisions and special purpose properties. Other valuation assignments cover rental valuations, partial interest studies (leasehold/leased fee estates), waterfront commercial and industrial properties for various port authorities, together with remote large acreage agricultural and forest land. One of Mr. Macaulay's specialties in which he has extensive knowledge and over 25 years of experience with is Local improvement district (LID) special benefit and feasibility study analysis. Robert's (LID) special benefit and feasibility study experience includes a variety of road improvement, utility and other infrastructure projects. The firm's extensive experience with these projects dates back to 1975. Right-of-way projects include easement analysis for the United States Navy and analysis of 70+ parcels for the City of Renton for acquisition and easement purposes. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 168 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI (cont.) Numerous appraisals were also prepared for a large trunk water line easement extending under the Snohomish River to the Tulalip Tribes and City of Marysville for the City of Everett. Similar to right-of-way work, special benefit and economic feasibility studies have been completed for the cities of Marysville, Vancouver, Bellevue, Burien, Ferndale, Freeland, Kent, Lynnwood, Ocean Shores, and Yelm (2006 to 2015). Consultation work on a road improvement district (RID) project for unincorporated Clallam County was performed in 2010. Other current or recently completed projects (2010-2014) include special benefit and feasibility studies for the cities of Bellevue, Edgewood, Freeland, Lynnwood and Tacoma. In addition to over 30 other feasibility and special benefit studies completed. A wide variety of multi -parcel right-of-way acquisition appraisals have been completed, such as riverbank protection easements for the City of Tukwila, right-of-way acquisition for road widening for the City of Bellingham and utility line easements, road widening and other public improvement projects for the City of Everett. A large right-of-way project for the Montana Department of Highways near Kalispell, Montana was completed several years ago. Also, eminent domain appraisals have been completed for the Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation (WSDOT) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad in Wenatchee and Tacoma. Other special purpose assignments are 6,000 acres on the Tulalip Indian Reservation for the Tulalip Tribes, 80 acres on Burrows Island in Skagit County, 900 acres in Skagit County for Skagit County Parks and Recreation Department, and the Eagle Harbor ferry maintenance site on Bainbridge Island for WSDOT. Various reports on mineral rights have been completed, including an 80-acre operating quarry in Bremerton, WA. Testified in various cases in King, Snohomish and Skagit counties, together with presentations at LID hearings on preliminary and final assessment rolls. Qualified as expert witness in the states of Washington and Montana. Other Experience Mr. Macaulay has been involved with MRSC dating back to the late 1990's and involves published (and updated) information on their website pertaining to local improvement district (LID) special benefit analysis, methodology and proportionality issues for a wide range of LID projects such as freeway interchange/arterial road improvements, utility (large sewer/water installation) infrastructure, slope stabilization, bridge improvements and other related publicly funded development. Numerous presentations have been made around the state for MRSC involving LID analysis examples completed for various cities and utility districts. Conferences have been made touching upon a wide variety of special benefit analysis issues relating to a wide variety of LID projects ranging from $500,000 to over 100 million in project cost. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 169 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI (cont.) Representative Client List Cities/Counties Cities of Aberdeen, Arlington, Bellevue, Bellingham, Blaine, Bothell, Burlington, Edgewood, Edmonds, Everett, Ferndale, Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland, Lacey, Lake Forest Park, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Marysville, Mount Vernon, Mukilteo, Oak Harbor, Ocean Shores, Pacific, Port Townsend, Redmond, Renton, Seattle, Shoreline, Stanwood, Sultan, Tacoma, Vancouver, Wenatchee and Washougal. Counties of Clark, Clallam, Douglas, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, Thurston and Whatcom. Government Ports of Anacortes, Edmonds, Everett, Seattle and Skagit County. Edmonds, Everett, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Monroe, Mukilteo, Marysville and Snohomish School Districts. Washington State Parks, WSDOT (Approved Appraiser/Reviewer Lists), DNR, WA State Attorney General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Navy, Everett Parks Foundation, Seattle DOT, University of Washington, Department of Interior, Snohomish County PUD, Skagit County PUD, Montana Department of Highways, Financial Institutions Anchor Bank, Bank of Washington, Banner Bank, Community Bank, Columbia Bank, Commerce Bank, International Bank, Heritage Bank, Homestreet Bank, Pacific Coast Bank, Opus Bank, Prime Pacific Bank, Fargo. Corporations, Law Firms and Non Profits BECU, China Trust Bank, Coastal First Savings Bank Northwest, GBC Key Bank, Mountain Pacific Bank, One Peoples Bank, US Bancorp and Wells Weyerhaeuser Company, Puget Sound Energy, SCA Engineering, Entranco Engineering, The Trust for Public Land, OTAK, HDR, Inc., The Boeing Company, Coates Field Service, Inc., Perteet Engineering, Gray & Osborne, Inc., Tetra Tech, Steven J. Fields, Brewe Layman, Weed, Graafstra & Benson, Inc., P.S., Anderson Hunter, Foster Pepper, Burgess, Fitzer, Leighton & Phillips, Inslee, Best & Dozier, Preston, Gates & Ellis. State Certification Number - General: 1100517 Expiration: 10/10/23 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 170 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Qualifications of Jim E. Dodge Senior Associate Appraiser ABS Valuation Education Bachelor of Science in Business Management, University of Idaho, 1977. Professional Education Appraisal Courses: Standards of Professional Practice SPP- Part C, Standards of Professional Practice SPP- Part B. Report Writing and Valuation Analysis, Case Studies 2-1, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, Module A, Capitalization Theory & Techniques, Parts 1BA & 1BB, Basic Valuation Procedures 1A2, Real Estate Appraisal Principles 1A1 Seminars and Continuing Education (abbreviated summary of coursework): • Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) • IRWA: 403-Easement Valuation • IRWA: 802 - Legal Aspects of Easements • AI: Business Practice & Ethics, Agricultural Special Use • AI: Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book) • AI: Easements & Divided Partial Interests, Errors & Misconceptions in Yellow Book • AI: USPAP, Evaluating Commercial Construction, Business Practices & Ethics • AI: Attacking/Defending Appraisals in Litigation, Fall Real Estate Conference • AI: Real Estate Finance, Statistics & Valuation Modeling, Course 300 • AI: Eminent Domain & Condemnation, Conservation Easements, Analyzing Distressed Properties • Appraisal Review Overview (WSDOT) • AI: Partial Interest Valuation • AI: Condemnation Appraising - Basic Principles, 710 Professional Affiliation Practicing Affiliate, Appraisal Institute. Approved Appraiser and Review Appraiser, Washington State Department of Transportation Member, International Right -of -Way Association Appraisal Experience Assignments have included fee and ad valorem appraisals of commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural and special use properties. Qualified as an expert witness in Snohomish County and Island County Superior Courts. Presentations at LID/LUD preliminary and final assessment roll hearings. Ad Valorem appraisal contracts completed for several northern Idaho counties. Tasks included field inspections, analysis of market data, agricultural production income/costs, depreciation studies and board of equalization. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 171 8.1.f SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA JIM DODGE (cont.) A variety of right-of-way acquisition appraisals have been completed, typically involving multiple parcel assignments. Projects include trail acquisition for the Snohomish County Parks Department and the Skagit County Parks Department. Right-of-way acquisition for road widening purposes have been completed for Snohomish and Skagit County Public Works departments and the cities of Marysville, Snohomish, Stanwood, Lake Stevens and Everett. A highway right-of-way acquisition project for the Montana Department of Highways involved approximately 100 properties. Eminent domain appraisals have been completed for the Washington State Department of Transportation. Currently on the WSDOT approved list for fee and review appraisers. Valuation assignments completed cover a wide variety of commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural and special use properties in addition to real estate consultations with private individuals and organizations. LID Special Benefit Study experience includes the 1,400 acre Northwest Landing development by Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company at DuPont, WA, City of Ocean Shores sewer LID 98-01 and various studies for Snohomish County PUD No. 1 and Skagit County PUD No. 1. Representative Client List Cities/Counties Cities of Arlington, Bellingham, Burlington, Edmonds, Everett, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Marysville, Monroe, Mountlake Terrace, Mount Vernon, Mukilteo, Oak Harbor, Ocean Shores, Renton, Seattle, Snohomish, Stanwood, Sultan, and Woodinville. Counties of Island, King, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, and Whatcom. Government Ports of Everett and Skagit County. Edmonds, Everett, Granite Falls, Mukilteo, Marysville and Stanwood School Districts. WSDOT, U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command NW, Seattle City Light, Snohomish County PUD, Skagit County PUD, Tulalip Tribes, Lummi Indian Nation and Montana Department of Highways. Financial Institutions Bank of Washington, BECU, Everett Mutual Bank, Farm Credit Services, First Heritage Bank, First Interstate Bank, Frontier Savings Bank, Seafirst National Bank, The Commerce Bank and US Bancorp. Corporations, Law Firms and Non -Profits Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, Puget Sound Energy, OTAK, HDR Inc., Coates Field Service, Inc., Perteet Engineering, Brewe Layman, Weed, Graafstra & Benson, Inc., P.S., Anderson Hunter, Hill Street Development, Industrial Electric, Les Schwab, Millstone, Northcoast Electric, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Providence Hospital, Steel Fab and Tyr Energy. State Certification Number - General: 1100557 Expiration: 9/3/23 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 172 8.1.g C AVE. S r o 00- W C� err 000-900 K:cf7 T. _ �0�N0 �MM / 0 r F-I N01*17'03"E 119.90 G r; ALLEY ,- 7� r n S01 *17'03"W 119.88 col CA G < , V D J \ c� m 0 o; \ N o� C) \ .m 0 co 0 TI 00 0 Z 0 0 C/7 ; x m 30' \ �ON� 0 MM CA 0)�0 r 0 I 9TH AVE. S n : � •�• ram; frTl �'.. EYOR... Un O a Packet Pg. 173 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Council "Roles" Statement Staff Lead: Council President Vivian Olson Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Although the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission (pdc) describes our Edmonds City Council positions as nonpartisan, this facet of our positions is not expressly stated in our City code or on the City website. The Council "Mission" currently on the website is attached. Recent events have indicated a lack of agreement among councilmembers and among residents about what the roles of the Edmonds City Council are. Staff Recommendation Consider proposed "Roles" statement and offer input and/or amendments. It will be brought back for action on a future council agenda unless the body is ready to vote to put on the consent agenda for the next regular meeting. Narrative As we do not have a job description, City Code and Council Policies and Mission Statements or "Statements of Roles" are relied on for providing this clarity. These documents are not setting clear expectations for the councilmembers and the community. A clear "Roles" statement should be agreed upon and made visible to all. Such a statement should express the nonpartisan nature of our elections and positions* and the part time hours our salaries are based on** (or both of those things should be changed to reflect the reality of who we are, what we do, and how much time that takes). The City of Redmond and the City of Shoreline have "identity and roles" statements that are very similar to each other. From Shoreline's: "As the City's governing body, Shoreline's seven elected part-time City Councilmembers establish City policies and laws, adopt an annual budget, approve appropriations, contract for services and grant franchises. City Councilmembers serve staggered four-year terms; roughly half the Council is up for election every two years. All Councilmembers are "at -large" meaning that they serve the City as a whole as opposed to a specific district. Packet Pg. 174 8.2 Redmond's statement additionally mentions that the positions are nonpartisan. Many articles have been written and published over the years on the subject of nonpartisan elections and positions, to include some that express what is intended by such designations and what are the typical impacts (positive and negative). Some examples are provided as attachments for reference. An updated statement of "Council Roles" is attached for consideration. Attachments: Mission, Purpose & Contact - City of Edmonds, WA Proposed replacement language for current Mission on website Keeping Political Partisanship Out of Local Government _ icma Keep partisan politics out of city government_ Opinion — Daily News Why are some elections non -partisan— - MSU Extension Packet Pg. 175 8.2.a MISSION, PURPOSE & CONTACT MISSION The City Council establishes City policies, sets forth the powers vested in legislative bodies, represents the City on boards and commissions, attends Council meetings and legislative briefings, represents the City to other organizations, and performs ceremonial duties. PURPOSE The City Council is the legislative body that establishes City policy. The Council's legislative authority is established by Title 35 of the Revised Code of Washington Laws of Cities and Towns. Section 35A.11.020 of the Optional Municipal Code sets forth the powers vested in legislative bodies of non -charter code cities. CODE OF ETHICS The City Council approved the attached Code of Ethics on June 2, 2015. CONTACT City Council Offices 1215th Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 nNiVANUINZ1:3 council@edmondswa.gov a Packet Pg. 176 8.2.b Proposed replacement for current "Mission" on City website that expressly asserts the non partisan nature of our position "Roles of the City Council" (new heading to replace "Mission" on the City website) As the legislative branch of a mayor -council, non -partisan form of government, seven part-time councilmembers are elected directly by the people to staggered four year terms. All positions represent the community at large. The City Council adopts the City budget, establishes law and policy, approves appropriations and contracts, levies taxes, and grants franchises. Councilmembers also represent the City on boards and commissions and to other organizations. E w U) 0 0 U Packet Pg. 177 8.2.c Home Keeping Political Partisanship Out of Local Government Sometimes inaction is appropriate By Michael Williams, PhD, ICMA-CM I Aug01, 20211 PM MAGAZINE -ARTICLE Political polarization and incivility are intensifying in society today, which has included a desire by some advocates to demonstrate that elected officials, as opinion leaders, favor their opinion. As a result, city councils, county boards, and individual elected officials have been asked to adopt positions on a variety of political and divisive issues that do not directly pertain to city or county services. Understandably, elected officials have strong opinions and are prone to action to solve problems and improve their communities. This article suggests that sometimes restraint from action can be the wiser choice. Political polarization is feeding on itself. For example, there is substantial literature that demonstrates that partisanship is correlated with migration, to the point that it impacts decisions about where and with whom one will live. In addition, today's technology supports the creation of like-minded "communities" within our personal digital world. We can easily choose to read and view only information that supports our own opinions. The increased polarization within these "echo chambers' can foster dehumanizing language, increased incivility, and extreme ideals. Partisan polarization combined with incivility and gridlock contributes to the low trust in the federal government. The Pew Research Center finds that not only is the public's confidence in the federal government low, but partisan animosity has increased substantially and trust among individuals is shrinking. Seventy-five percent of adults believe that American's trust in the federal government is declining and 64 percent believe that trust in each other is shrinking. Over 85 percent of people feel that those that voted for the other candidate in the 2020 presidential election do not understand "people like me" Many intense partisans even believe the opposing party's policies are "so misguided that they threaten the nation's well-being'! In short, when considering partisan issues, we have become so divided that we do not trust one another. Thankfully, local government remains nonpartisan. We even know, from studies by Richard Florida, that "Democratic and Republican residents see very little difference on local issues" People that might very well be divided on national issues are not necessarily divided on local issues. Thus, trust in local government remains high. Further, that high level of trust is critical to social capital, compromise, collaboration, and relationships —critical components to solving local problems. Recently, local governing bodies have been requested to enter the political fray about issues such as the Second Amendment and gun control, school choice, immigration and refugee policy, COVID-19 business closures and mask mandates, and other topics that do not directly pertain to city/county services. These types of issues are incompatible with the regular duties of local government for at least five reasons. 1. Local governments rely on relationships, collaboration, and compromise to solve problems and provide services. Injecting the partisan divide into local decisions may very well degrade the crucial relationships and trust required to solve local issues. In local government, our relationships are much more important than party and ideology. 2. Local issues are almost exclusively nonpartisan. Residents' attitudes about local issues are not shaped by partisan politics or party loyalty. 3. Local government officials typically use their roles to build community trust and healthy relationships rather than contribut disagreement and bickering. Packet Pg. 178 8.2.c 4.Often, the public is unaware of the limitations of the authority of city and county governments. Proposed resolutions may not have th impact desired or anticipated by its supporters. 5. When governing bodies, individual elected officials, or local government managers meander from their proper roles, things will get messy fast. What we do in local government is not partisan or overtly political. Local governments do not decide everything with a vote but, rather, operate much more with consensus on community issues. This makes sense because, as Richard Florida found, there is very little difference between the attitudes of Democrats and Republicans on local issues. No doubt, a single elected official's political base might agree with a position on a non-city/county issue; and the entire elected body might agree with a position on a non-city/county issue. But why would the body act on an empty proclamation or resolution that will be the cause of any divide in the community? It does not make sense politically or for the common good. County boards and city councils have responsibilities in numerous policy areas —many of them statutory or mandated —that need not intersect with controversial, partisan issues. To differentiate and define such boundaries, several county boards in Minnesota have adopted policies or guidelines that describe when a county will (or will not) consider a resolution or proclamation. To use cliche, these boards are formalizing the concept of "staying in their lane" and working within their defined role as county commissions. An important reason for formalizing this type of policy is to not only be fair with every constituency, but also with one another. To be successful, all elected members must adhere to a policy to prohibit action on issues that are irrelevant to city or county government. Being nonpartisan will not prevent a local government from confronting controversy or partisan disagreement. But freedom from partisan controversy and the partisan atmosphere enhances a local government's trust within the community and increases its ability to solve local issues. A local government's effectiveness is enhanced by its nonpartisan nature. Let's keep it that way. MICHAEL WILLIAMS, PhD, ICMA-CM, is county administrator of Stearns County, Minnesota. REGISTER FOR THE ICMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE Join us September 17-21 in Columbus/Franklin County, Ohio for the 2022 ICMA Annual Conference. REGISTER TODAY Advertisement JOIN ICMA TODAY! ICMA provides the tools, resources and connections to help you become part of the international network of 13,000+ local government management professionals. BECOMEAMEMBER Q Packet Pg. 179 8.2.d NEWS Keep partisan politics out of city government: Opinion NO Packet Pg. 180 8.2.d Fontana Mayor Acquanetta Warren By DAILY NEWS I I • PUBLISHED: January 10, 2013 at 12:00 a.m. I UPDATED: August 28, 2017 at 8:35 a.m. • • Q Packet Pg. 181 8.2.d One Fontana, one leadership team, regardless of politics DURING my tenure as mayor of this great city of Fontana I have had a consistent message: "One City - One Leadership Team." It has been this philosophy which has allowed us, as a city, to be highly successful in providing quality services to our residents, building infrastructure to meet the needs of the entire community, and engendering trust so our City Council can provide nonpartisan leadership in solving the city's challenges. There is only one goal: To always move Fontana forward in a positive direction. Nonpartisan leadership is the key to this success. Putting party labels on local government officials directly defies what the founding fathers of this nation envisioned. Whether Republican or Democratic, our duty is to serve this community and assure that life, liberty and d the pursuit of happiness is achieved by all. While I serve as mayor, this will continue to be the guarantee to all the citizens we are privileged d to represent. r Building a library, interchange, road or storm drain system is necessary, irrespective of a public official's partisan registration. Providing police and fire safety services, or a quality after -school program to enhance the educational system is all about meeting needs and doing f/J 2 the right thing. O Discussions about the implications of the recent election are misplaced when they focus strictly on partisan issues, rather than focusing on the needs of the community. Fontana is one city, with one elected leadership team, and we will continue to work together for the good of all. Pursuing policy based on partisan politics is counterproductive to the success of the community as a whole. O V If you look at the other levels of government where partisan and parties dominate you see the business of the people taking a back seat to to the partisan gamesmanship of both political parties. You need to look no further than the current battle between the executive branch and 3 the House of Representatives to stave off the "fiscal cliff" which could result in an economic downturn for the entire nation. This is not d Z what we want to happen to local governments and particularly in our city. Z+ .i In Fontana city elections the ballot doesn't list the party affiliations of the candidates because once elected you must leave those affiliations at the door. Once elected to the City Council, you only need to address one basic issue as you consider your vote: "Is this good for Fontana?" C We all have our beliefs and they pattern our ability to govern but they can't be the driving force when we decide at the local level to serve 2 our neighbors. O O I respect each person's voice and opinion on local issues and encourage everyone to participate in the process of Fontana government. Whether Republican or Democrat, your opinions are important to me and to the other members on the City Council. Let your voice be C heard because it will be listened to by all. O E C Right now, Fontana is fortunate to have a diverse City Council representative of the community as a whole. That is truly positive. d O Fontana, beware of partisan party interests from any political party organizers who want to interject party politics into this city and local 0) government. There is no place for it here at the local level. We must not allow partisan politics to polarize the community by race, gender or party affiliations. We have far too many challenges and good work ahead of us to be distracted by such counterproductive messages. v w O Fontana is indeed a very diverse community with a rich history of being a family -oriented community. Let's keep it that way. 7 O Surely, we don't desire the dysfunctional structure that governs us at the state and federal level, because we want to get things done and be V responsive to the needs of our citizens. Fontanans demand action and results, not finger -pointing and political games. ++ O Our Founding Fathers, who sat down in Philadelphia in 1787 and wrote the 17-page document known as the Constitution of the United O- States of America, didn't intend party politics to destroy the ability of our nation to govern at the federal and state levels or to dominate M every decision made for our nation from our birth to our death. It should be this Constitution, our laws, and the needs of our community to that drive our decisions, not special interest groups. Q. As long as I am mayor, Fontana will continue to be successful because we will not allow the interference of political parties to dominate C our policy discussions. Rather it will be the needs and voices of our citizens to which each and every member of this City Council will Y listen. Fontana has been and will continue to be a glowing example of what happens when party politics do not get a chance to dominate. }; C I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your trust in me as mayor. I look forward to working with each and every one of you, O regardless of whether you are a Republican, a Democrat or neither. This community deserves nothing less. I sincerely wish you and your C� families all the best in the new year. Q The future of Fontana is exceptionally bright. By working together, there is nothing we cannot do! Acquanetta Warren is the mayor of Fontana. Packet Pg. 182 Why are some elections non -partisan? Eric Walcott, Michigan State University Extension - December 1, 2017 r c E a� Some cities' elections in Michigan are partisan while others are nonpartisan. r U) a� 0 Recently, I heard a county commissioner note that their board worked so well together because they were able to set aside partisan differences and focus on what needed to 0 be done for their county. That commissioner added that they thought all county U elections should be non -partisan, rather than partisan elections. Unfortunately, for that .N commissioner, Michigan counties do not have the authority to change the structure of x their elections; that would require a change in state law, according to the Michigan w � Bureau of Elections. However, some elections in Michigan and across the country are non -partisan, for a variety of reasons. _ ca In Michigan, cities have the authority to decide whether elections for offices such as city council or commission and mayor are partisan elections or non -partisan. In non -partisan elections, such as in the City of Lansing, a specified number of candidates advance from the primary and face off in the general election. In Lansing, the top two individuals who receive majority vote in the mayoral race advance from the primary to the general election with no party affiliation stated. Other cities, like Ann Arbor, have partisan elections similar to those for state and federal offices. Proponents of non -partisan elections argue that at the local level, political parties are irrelevant to providing services. The famous saying for this situation is, "There is no Democratic or Republican way to pick up the garbage." They also suggest that cooperation between officials belonging to different parties is more likely. Politicians in non -partisan offices are in theory more likely to be focused on getting their job done than making the other party look bad, as we often see at the national level. Packet Pg. 183 Non -partisan elections also are more likely to encourage moderate candidates be candidates are more likely to have to seek votes from across the political spectrum. This also leads to elections that are more competitive. For example, in Lansing's recent mayoral election both candidates in the general election were affiliated with the Democratic Party. However, it was a non -partisan election, which allowed the two to fac off in the general election, and forced them to campaign to voters across the spectrum. Non -partisan elections also tend to be more competitive, and are less likely to have candidates running unopposed. Many elected offices in areas that lean heavily to Republican or heavily Democratic are essentially decided in the Primary, with no member of the other party running in the general election. Non -partisan elections allow for competitive campaigns in these seats, giving the voters more options to choose from. 0 Opponents argue that the absence of party labels confuses voters and that in the L) absence of party affiliation, unprepared voters often turn to whatever cue is available, 0 L) which often ends up being the ethnicity of a candidate's name. Without a doubt, name c recognition becomes more important in non -partisan elections. For all else they may r bring, party identification does usually give voters some idea of where a candidate x LU stands on certain issues. Cn Non -partisan elections place more burden on voters to seek information about individuE candidates, rather than party platform. While many would view this as a positive, if voters do not do their research, the result is an even less informed electorate, which can lead to lower voter participation. Across the county, many municipalities use non -partisan voting. According to the National League of Cities, only seven of the 30 largest cities in the United States use partisan elections to elect their local officials. The Nebraska State Senate, the state's only legislative chamber, is technically non -partisan because there are no formal party groups within the Senate. However, almost all members are affiliated with the Democratic or Republican Party and both parties explicitly endorse candidates. In Michigan, as mentioned, cities have the authority to implement non -partisan elections for local offices, but units of government, such as counties, do not. It would require changes to state law to allow counties to move to non -partisan elections or to consider non -partisan elections statewide. As a voter, what do you think? How would non- partisan elections affect elections where you live? Packet Pg. 184 Those in Michigan State University_ Extension that focus on Government and Publi Policy- provide various training programs that are available to be presented in your county. Contact your local Government and Public Policy educator for more information This article was published by Michigan State University Extension. For more informatior visit https://extension.msu.edu. To have a digest of information delivered straight to you email inbox, visit https://extension.msu.edu/newsletters. To contact an expert in your area, visit https://extension.msu.edu/experts, or call 888-MSUE4M1 (888-678-3464). c E a� p-irtancinn mcii arlu F, v c O MSU is an affirmative -action, equal -opportunity employer, committed to achieving excellence through a diverse �? workforce and inclusive culture that encourages all people to reach their full potential. r_ Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national O y origin, gender, gender identity, religion, age, height, weight, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, family status or veteran status. Issued in furtherance of MSU Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, x 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Quentin Tyler, Director, MSU Extension, East W Lansing, MI 48824. This information is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names does not imply endorsement by MSU Extension or bias against those not mentioned. The 4-H Name and Emblem have special protections from Congress, protected by code 18 USC 707. We comply with the Federal Trade Commission 1998 Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) c u�i (https://www.ftc.goy/enforcement/rules/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings/childrens-online-privacy_ protection -rule). Q Packet Pg. 185 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 Public Information Officer Job Description Revision Staff Lead: Council President Olson Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Council President Olson requested a revision to the job description of the city's Public Information Officer position. This item was discussed at both the July 12, 2022 and July 16, 2022 PSPHSP Committee meetings. Staff Recommendation For Council's consideration for approval of changes to the job description. Narrative The main objective of these changes to the job description is to clarify the expectation of neutral and fact -based communications and to limit/prohibit the position of the Public Information Officer from preparing and/or disseminating opinion -based commentary. Job descriptions are policy and serve to inform the Public Information Officer's supervisor(s) and the public of this expectation. This revised job description has been reviewed by HR and approved as meeting city standards. The city attorney agrees that RCW 35A.11.020 places the content of job descriptions within the council's purview and is not aware of anything in the city code or elsewhere that requires review of a job description to initiate with the administration, as opposed to the council. Attachments: Draft PIO Job Description 2022-07-12 City Council - Full Minutes-3156 2022-07-18 City Council - Public Minutes-3159 RCW 35A.11.020_ Powers vested in legislative bodies of noncharter and charter code cities_ Olympia Strategic Communications Director Packet Pg. 186 8.3.a City of EDMONDS Washington Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist Department: Community Services Pay Grade: NR-10* Bargaining Unit: AFSCME FLSA Status: Non-exempt Revised Date: 01/08/2020 Reports To: Community Services Director *This position's wages were established on the non -represented scale. It was later determined this position qualifies for AFSCME membership. Wages will be bargained on the AFSCME scale with the next union contract negotiations. POSITION PURPOSE: The Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist is a professional -level position that directly impacts the relationship between the City and its citizens through the dissemination of critical information and the development of effective communication and engagement strategies. The incumbent is responsible for developing media strategies that promote a positive public image, create transparency, improve public engagement, and alleviate impacts of emergency and crisis situations. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Plans and manages Public Information Office (PIO) activities for the City, including community relations, media relations, public relations, and marketing; • Exercises independent judgment within broad policy guidelines; evaluates and analyzes issues and recommends solutions; provides leadership, direction, and guidance in PIO strategies, internal policy development, and priorities; • Develops information and public statements to ensure that the City's key messages generate accurate coverage of city issues and reach the internal and external customers; • Writes, edits, and disseminates press releases, newsletters, bulletins, information packages, and public service announcements; this position expressly does not provide support in preparation or distribution of opinion -based commentary of personal views. • Assists in the development of media strategies for City programs and departments; places stories in media outlets and on the City website, and advises on placement of content on City website; • Establishes effective relationships with journalists to promote the City's image; responds to inquiries from news media and City departments; • Designs, develops, and edits public communications and promotional materials utilizing a variety of media; • Attends City and local meetings to collect information and encourage effective communications; • Maintains program records and files; prepares special and recurring reports; • Promotes City services and events through a variety of communication platforms, including the integration of the City's website, social media, and other emerging platforms; • Develops, manages, and posts content for the social media, website, and other platforms; maintains a consistent writing style, voice, and branding across platforms; Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist Last Reviewed: 03/01/2022 Last Revised: 01/08/2020 Packet Pg. 187 8.3.a 2 of 4 JOB DESCRIPTION Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist • Composes communications on a wide variety of subjects requiring knowledge of City procedures and policies; creates media articles, technical documents, special reports, and other communications. • Serves as City Spokesperson to provide public information and promote public awareness of City programs and events; • Conducts and coordinates assigned projects, research studies, surveys, and special events; analyzes and interprets data and communicates results; • Works effectively and collaboratively with the City's Web Systems Analyst and department web representatives to establish city-wide standards for online communications and ensure a cohesive and consistent communications strategy across departments.; • Supports the PIO function during emergencies as a part of the Public Information Team for the City's EOC. Required Knowledge of: • City policies and procedures. • Current principles, techniques, and objectives of marketing, public information, media relations, and community relations programs. • Professional journalistic methods, including research, publication, and presentation. • Legal, ethical, and professional rules of conduct for public sector employees. • Current legislative, political, and economic trends in State and Federal governmental activities. • Local community resources and regional community services programs. • Project planning and management principles. • Materials, processes, equipment, methods, and techniques used in the production of video projects. • FCC guidelines, rules, and regulations governing public access television. Required Skill in: • Principles and best practices of public relations, marketing, and news media techniques, including Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. • Principles and best practices of effective copy writing and copy editing. • Best practices and applications of social media. • Publications and communications productions in a multi -media environment. • Research methodology, reporting techniques, and report preparation principles. • Developing community relations and communications programs and strategies. • Representing the City to and communicating effectively with members of the media, other agencies, and the public. • Maintaining composure and working effectively in a high-pressure environment with changing priorities. • Preparing and presenting information for diverse audiences. • Producing, directing, writing, shooting, and editing public access video productions. • Assessing and prioritizing multiple tasks, projects, and demands. • Methods and procedures of file management and business correspondence. • English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation. • Contemporary office procedures, methods, and computer equipment. • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships. Required Ability to: • Create timely, accurate, and relevant web content, social media content, multimedia content, video content, and materials that support City outreach goals and municipal government/industry standards and practices. • Communicate with all sectors of the public across diverse issues and audiences, including the media. • Work collaboratively with the City's web designer, department web representatives, and other City staff. Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist Last Reviewed: 03/01/2022 Last Revised: 01/08/2020 Packet Pg. 188 8.3.a 3 of 4 JOB DESCRIPTION Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist • Handle sensitive and complex projects or issues to generate relevant, accurate, fact -based, and appropriate public information, stories, content, and professional guidance, working in partnership with other City staff. • Deploy creative marketing plans across multiple platforms and media sources. • Analyze complex problems and develop creative solutions. • Assist with writing speeches or talking points and preparing/coaching speakers. • Maintain political neutrality while working with elected officials on City messaging, and be accountable for the accuracy of information released. • Work effectively in a fast -paced environment with competing priorities and deadlines. • Travel locally to attend meetings or make presentations. • Work and act as a team player in all interactions with other City employees. • Provide a high level of customer service at all times. • Project and maintain a professional and positive image with those contacted in the course of work. • Develop and maintain collaborative and respectful working relationships with team members and others. • Maintain regular and dependable attendance. • Work in a manner consistent with the City of Edmond's mission and organizational values. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: Bachelor's Degree in Journalism, Communications, Public Relations, Marketing, or related field; AND four (4) years of increasingly responsible experience, preferably within the public sector; OR an equivalent combination of education, training, and experience that will allow the incumbent to successfully perform the essential functions of the position. Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check. Required Licenses or Certifications: Valid Driver's license required at time of hire. State of Washington Driver's License required within 30 days of hire WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Office environment • Frequent interruptions • Travel to conduct work may be necessary at times, mostly locally • Some evening and weekend hours may be required for meetings and events Physical Abilities • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone • Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment • Reading and understanding a variety of materials • Sitting or otherwise remaining stationary for extended periods of time • Bending at the waist, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish task. Hazards: • Contact with angry and/or dissatisfied customers. • Prolonged exposure to glare from computer monitors. Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist Last Reviewed: 03/01/2022 Last Revised: 01/08/2020 Packet Pg. 189 8.3.a 4 of 4 JOB DESCRIPTION Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist • Exposure to heavy dust in some work areas • Occasional exposure to toxic or caustic chemicals, i.e. copier toner Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Date: Date: Public Information Officer/Communications Strategist Last Reviewed: 03/01/2022 Last Revised: 01/08/2020 Packet Pg. 190 8.3.b PUBLIC SAFETY, PLANNING, HUMAN SERVICES, & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING July 12, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair) Councilmember Susan Paine Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Elected Officials Present Councilmember Diane Buckshnis 1. CALL TO ORDER Staff Participating Virtually Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Michelle Bennett, Police Chief Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPHSP Committee meeting was called to order at 4:30 p.m. by Councilmember L. Johnson. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Administrative Services Job Descriptions Mr. Turley explained there are four accounting specialist positions in administrative services, one that does payroll, one that does accounts payable/receivable, and two that do utility billing; each have a job description written specifically and uniquely for that job. The accounting skills are similar enough that the job descriptions for the three positions could be combined into one which would assist with cross - training and work coverage for one another. This proposal is acceptable to the union, the employees and HR. Staff's recommendation is to combine the three job descriptions into one. Discussion followed regarding support for the proposal, limiting siloing and providing backup when needed. Action: Consent Agenda 2. New Public Records Associate Position Mr. Turley explained the City currently has one public records officer who handles all public records requests other than for the police department who does their own. Public records requests have increased dramatically in the last year and fulfilling them take a great deal of time especially when information needs to be redacted. The proposed public records associate position, which would be two pay ranges below the public records, would respond immediately to requests and handle simple requests as well as provide vacation coverage and have opportunity for advancement. The packet includes statistics regarding the increase in public records requests. Discussion followed the growth in requests this year over last year, reasons for the increase in requests, whether requests are made by the same people, redactions made by city attorney's office, public records requests related to elected officials, opportunity for technology solutions, best practices for electeds related to public records requests, legislative changes related to public records requests, requests received for years' worth of emails, asking a requester for specificity, and restrictions against requesting information for commercial purposes. Packet Pg. 191 8.3.b 07/12/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 2 Mr. Turley clarified the request is for a new job description and an FTE. He anticipated the position would be filled by approximately September; the position could be funded for the remaining four months from salary savings due to other vacancies or via a budget amendment. Discussion continued regarding financials not driving operations, a suggestion to add review of the position to the Finance Committee agenda, and a preference to have this position go to full council. Action: Full council 3. Public Records Specialist Position Request Chief Bennett explained this position is related to public disclosure requests (PDR) specific to body cameras. She provided statistics and lessons learned from the Seattle Police Department; all officers were equipped with body cameras in 2017. At that time they had 8 public disclosure personnel, 2 litigation support analysts, and a full-time video specialist. Seattle now has 13 public disclosure personnel, 2 litigation support analysts, 1 communication analyst and 3 video specialists and over 3.4 million videos in Evidence.com and have retained all video since the programs inception. She anticipated Edmonds would purge video that is not of evidentiary value in 30-90 days. Since Edmonds Police Department's pilot program began, it was discovered every 1 hour of video takes 6-10 hours to redact. Existing staff has been doing that work which has been difficult. The delay in proceeding with a full body camera program is due in part to the need for these PDR positions. She was hopeful that two positions would be enough to handle PDR specific to bodycams. This is a request for a second position (one position was included in the budget); the job description is included in the agenda packet. The original position was anticipated to be a commissioned person but it was determined the disclosures could be handled by a non-commissioned person which is less expensive. Staff's recommendation is to approve the job description and the budget request for a second position. Questions and discussion followed regarding hazards mentioned in the job description, support for the job description but concern with a request for second position, a suggestion to clarify the need for a second position in the agenda memo, and efficiencies associated with posting and filling two positions at the same time. Action: Full Council with explanation regarding the need for a second position. 4. Police Cadet Position Chief Bennett explained the budget for this position has already been approved. The job description was updated using information from Lynnwood's cadet program and the pay range was also updated. Discussion followed regarding support for this internship position and assistance this position will provide to the police department. Action: Consent Agenda 5. Public Information Officer Job Description Revision Council President Olson explained the intent was to add clarity regarding the role of the public information officer (PIO) which would be helpful to the person in the position as well as those the position reports to. The draft update to the job description in the packet reflects the research of other cities done by the council's executive assistant regarding the PIO job description as well as input from Interim Director Merriman who supervised the position at the time and who had experience working with PIOs in other cities. The job description was reviewed by Director Neill Hoyson and some changes were made, primarily removing "neutral" due to the difficulty quantifying that aspect. Packet Pg. 192 8.3.b 07/12/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 3 Questions and discussion followed regarding whether it was standard/accepted practice for the legislative branch to attempt to censor/limit information coming from the executive branch, concern with the legislative branch determining what was fact based, the role of the PIO, opinion pieces not within the role of the PIO, enforcement, redundancy in the description, PIO job descriptions in other cities, lack of a forum for the mayor to express their opinion, PIO as the City's mouthpiece and not opinion based, concern with council overstep, preference for opinion pieces to come from the mayor and not from the PIO, and concern this is person -based and not needs -based. Action: Return to PSPHSP Committee next month. 6. Repeal of Safe Gun Storage and Related Laws after Washington Supreme Court's Field Preemption Ruling Due to the late hour, this item was not considered. Councilmember L. Johnson advised the committee may have a special meeting to discuss this item. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 5:31 p.m. Packet Pg. 193 8.3.c PUBLIC SAFETY, PLANNING, HUMAN SERVICES & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING July 18, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Laura Johnson (Chair) Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Councilmember Susan Paine Scott Passey, City Clerk Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council virtual online PSPHSP Committee meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m. by Councilmember L. Johnson. Councilmember L. Johnson acknowledged the passing of Councilmember K. Johnson She served the City of Edmonds with admirable passion and dedication and she will be missed by many. Councilmember Paine said she has known Councilmember K. Johnson for 15 years. She had a passion for the arts and she appreciated her love of the environment and advocating for planting native species. She loved Edmonds and loved serving Edmonds. She had a great knowledge and understanding of planning and transportation. Her passing was terribly unexpected and she will be missed. Council President Olson said she was not prepared to make a statement. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Repeal of Safe Gun Storage and Related Laws After Washington Supreme Court's Field Preemption Ruling Mr. Taraday explained this ordinance was the subject of litigation brought against the City on the grounds that the ordinance was preempted by state law. That lawsuit went from Superior Court to the Court of Appeals and ultimately to the Supreme Court where the lawsuit was conclusively ruled upon as preempted by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court issued a ruling and mandate, the document that states the Supreme Court is done reviewing the Superior Court's decision and the Superior Court's decision stands. The Superior Court issued an injunction (entered by the court in October 2019 and subject to review for the last couple years) stated, "Upon final mandate, if the City does not prevail or does not appeal this order, this section must be repealed." The section referenced is 5.26.020 specifically. At this point there is effectively a court order demanding that the City repeal at least 5.26.020. Mr. Taraday explained the ordinance he prepared recognizing the Supreme Court ruling repeals in their entirety Ordinances 4120, 4121 and 4131. Ordinance 4121 was not the subject of the Court's decision, so technically the City is not under a court order requiring the repeal of Ordinance 4121. However, Ordinance 4121 refers to Ordinance 4120 so retaining it would create a dead-end in the code. Questions and discussion followed regarding who initiated this action; the city attorney's opinion that this action needs to be taken; dismay Edmonds' hands are tied by a state preemption; historic levels of mass shootings; the skyrocketing health crisis of shootings; information from the Be Smart secure firearm program about the importance of secure storage to protect children, the rise in unintentional shootings, increased rate of gun suicide among children in 2020 ages 17 and under, and firearms as the leading cause of death in children in the United States; the choice to own a weapon comes with the Packet Pg. 194 8.3.c 07/18/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 2 responsibility to store it securely; pride in the stance the City took to raise awareness and show that Edmonds takes prevention of gun violence seriously; the executive department's response to partner with Be Smart; what the City is mandated to do or not do; Seattle's ordinance that is still in court; preference to have Edmonds take gun violence prevention seriously and determine what else can be done; support for education and increased advocacy; how the legislative branch can support the executive branch; preference to do more than repeal the ordinance; and support for this going to a work group to answer questions about what else can be done before bringing it to council. Mr. Taraday said while it is true the judge's original injunction only targeted a particular section of chapter 5.26, it is very clear from the Supreme Court's decision there is no aspect of firearm regulation that is left to the cities; the state has preempted the entire field and until the state legislature changes that law, there is nothing left for cities to regulate in the realm of firearms and therefore, there is nothing to do regulation -wise at the city level. That does not mean the City cannot spend money educating gun owners on safety or adopt resolution asking the legislature to repeal the statute that preempts the field. There is no reason for the ordinances to remain when the State Supreme Court has it make it very clear there is nothing left to regulate at the city level. Questions and discussion continued regarding forming a taskforce to develop next steps for increasing safety, raising awareness and looking at ways to create improve safety such as handing out gun locks, working with the community to create an educational campaign to provide better access to safe gun storage solutions, advocating for a safe community, focusing on things that are within the realm of the city council, the City's involvement in the Be Smart program, preference to proceed with the repeal, concern repealing the ordinances without doing anything else such as a resolution is empty handed, support for adopting a resolution outlining what the council resolves to do at the same time the ordinances are repealed, residents' disappointment with the ruling, and whether delaying the repeal to create a resolution and take steps to increase advocacy, education and awareness creates any risk. Discussion and questions continued regarding no legal requirement that the repeal occur at the same time as follow-on action to bolster gun safety; when the mandate was issued (May 13, 2022); support for a resolution with recommendations for the legislature, city council and community; supporting efforts of the Be Smart program; residents' disappointment when the city council acted contrary to state law as well as with the city council's involvement in state and national issues; preference for the city council to focus on municipal issues; scheduling an agenda item to discuss what residents want the council to spend its time on; concern with downplaying gun violence; the recent addition of an extreme risk protection order to the City's code; and addressing gaps in the code before repealing the ordinance(s). Committee recommendation: Full council on July 26' with the intent of reviewing a resolution at the same time. Council President Olson advised she will schedule repeal of the ordinances on the July 26th if time allows, but she will not schedule a resolution until the more global issue related to council resolutions is addressed. 2. Public Information Officer Job Description Revision Council President Olson advised in response to concern at last week's committee meeting whether this was in the city council's purview, she provided RCW 35a.11.020 which states the content of job descriptions is within the council's purview. The proposed changes to the job description were due to the need for guardrails on the job description and making it clear communications by the PIO were the voice of the entire City and not opinion pieces. To support the concept that this is not personal, she referred to a media release that was not a neutral voice that was not done by the current PIO. Questions and discussion followed regarding other cities' PIO job description, cities with a strong mayor versus mayor/city manager form of government, a suggestion to replace "and be accountable for the Packet Pg. 195 8.3.c 07/18/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 3 accuracy of information released" (page 3 of job description) with "when working with an elected official(s), the elected official is accountable for the accuracy and the content of the information released," a suggestion to remove "or distribution" (page 3 of job description), support a PIO can provide electeds, only 5 press releases since 2016 that fall into the category of opinion, preference for discussion at full council, who the PIO reports to in other cities, concern none of the other job descriptions exert this amount control from the legislative branch, concern this is the third time this job description has been discussed by council in the last year, concern this is targeting information coming from the mayor's office, concern with using an employee to get at the mayor, who determines if o information is opinion -based or fact -based, and concern this is overstep by the legislative branch. .N Questions and discussion continued regarding concern with manipulating a city employee, other cities' job descriptions that hold the PIO responsible for fact -based and mention neutrality, HR's direction to remove reference to neutrality as it is intangible, HR's approval of the proposed job description, 6 press releases since 2020 that were opinion -based, concern a release regarding the PROS Plan was no longer on the City's website, guardrails to provide clarity between electeds and PIO, other avenues to address the issue, job descriptions within the council's purview, whether the form of effects the PIO's job description, the PIO is the voice of the City as a whole not the mayor or city manager, whether this is best practice, whether there are unintended consequences, concern with council overstep into administration and the employee's ability to do their job and feel secure, and the PIO being stuck between the administration and council. Questions and discussion continued regarding working with HR to come up with best practices, intent of the administrative order on bullying to protect employees, finding other guardrails to protect staff, a suggestion to remove, "this position expressly does not provide support in preparation or distribution of opinion -based commentary of personal views" and work with HR on alternate language, putting the responsibility for accuracy on the elected who provides the information, concern with how the council may intend to use this, the council's job to set policy, concern the policy is not clear enough to prevent the mayor from putting an employee in a position of violating policy, concern with addressing a policy issue via a job description, the committee's disagreement with the proposed job description, reason the job description was rescheduled to this meeting, and best practices for a PIO. Committee recommendation: Full council. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 3:27 p.m. Packet Pg. 196 7/15/22, 1:53 PM RCW 35A.11.020: Powers vested in legislative bodies of noncharter and charter code cities. MDF RCW 35A.11.020 Powers vested in legislative bodies of noncharter and charter code cities. The legislative body of each code city shall have power to organize and regulate its internal affairs within the provisions of this title and its charter, if any; and to define the functions, powers, and duties of its officers and employees; within the limitations imposed by vested rights, to fix the compensation and working conditions of such officers and employees and establish and maintain civil service, or merit systems, retirement and pension systems not in conflict with the provisions of this title or of existing charter provisions until changed by the people: PROVIDED, That nothing in this section or in this title shall permit any city, whether a code city or otherwise, to enact any provisions establishing or respecting a merit system or system of civil service for firefighters and police officers which does not substantially accomplish the same purpose as provided by general law in chapter 41.08 RCW for firefighters and chapter 41.12 RCW for police officers now or as hereafter amended, or enact any provision establishing or respecting a pension or retirement system for firefighters or police officers which provides different pensions or retirement benefits than are provided by general law for such classes. Such body may adopt and enforce ordinances of all kinds relating to and regulating its local or municipal affairs and appropriate to the good government of the city, and may impose penalties of fine not exceeding five thousand dollars or imprisonment for any term not exceeding one year, or both, for the violation of such ordinances, constituting a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor as provided therein. However, the punishment for any criminal ordinance shall be the same as the punishment provided in state law for the same crime. Such a body alternatively may provide that violation of such ordinances constitutes a civil violation subject to monetary penalty, but no act which is a state crime may be made a civil violation. The legislative body of each code city shall have all powers possible for a city or town to have under the Constitution of this state, and not specifically denied to code cities by law. By way of illustration and not in limitation, such powers may be exercised in regard to the acquisition, sale, ownership, improvement, maintenance, protection, restoration, regulation, use, leasing, disposition, vacation, abandonment or beautification of public ways, real property of all kinds, waterways, structures, or any other improvement or use of real or personal property, in regard to all aspects of collective bargaining as provided for and subject to the provisions of chapter 41.56 RCW, as now or hereafter amended, and in the rendering of local social, cultural, recreational, educational, governmental, or corporate services, including operating and supplying of utilities and municipal services commonly or conveniently rendered by cities or towns. In addition and not in limitation, the legislative body of each code city shall have any authority ever given to any class of municipality or to all municipalities of this state before or after the enactment of this title, such authority to be exercised in the manner provided, if any, by the granting statute, when not in conflict with this title. Within constitutional limitations, legislative bodies of code cities shall have within their territorial limits all powers of taxation for local purposes except those which are expressly preempted by the state as provided in RCW 66.08.120, * 82.36.440, 48.14.020, and 48.14.080. [ 2007 c 218 § 66; 1993 c 83 § 8; 1986 c 278 § 7; 1984 c 258 § 807; 1969 ex.s. c 29 § 1; 1967 ex.s. c 119 § 35A.11.020.] NOTES: *Reviser's note: Chapter 82.36 RCW was repealed in its entirety by 2013 c 225 § 501, effective July 1, 2016. https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35A.11.020 1 Packet Pg. 197 7/15/22, 1:53 PM RCW 35A.11.020: Powers vested in legislative bodies of noncharter and charter code cities. Intent—Finding-2007 c 218: See note following RCW 41.08.020. 8.3.d Effective date-1993 c 83: See note following RCW 35.21.163. Severability-1986 c 278: See note following RCW 36.01.010. Court Improvement Act of 1984—Effective dates—Severability—Short title-1984 c 258: See notes following RCW 3.30.010. Effective date-1969 ex.s. c 29: "The effective date of this act is July 1, 1969." [ 1969 ex.s c29§2.] https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35A.11.020 I Packet Pg. 198 8.3.e Strategic Communications D i rector Bargaining Unit: Independent CITY OF OLYMPIA Established Date: ]an 1, 1985 Revision Date: Jun 10, 2015 SALARY RANGE $65.19 Hourly $11,300.19 Monthly $135,602.27 Annually DESCRIPTION: Class Code: 19 Under the general direction of the City Manager develops and implements various programs relating to public communication and Community Relations Programs. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: The essential functions of this position include but are not limited to: 1. Directs the City's communication strategy development and implementation; this includes public information and education, media relations, public involvement, marketing, and emergency communications. 2. Develops strategies and tools for communication with our citizens (e.g. City News, Home Page, and Legislative Guide). 3. Advises on high profile media issues and plays a strategic communications and public involvement role on emerging public policy issues. 4. Develops and facilitates strategic approaches to emerging issues. 5. Negotiates and administers the City's cable television contracts. 6. Serves as community relations liaison. 7. Provides communications support and guidance to the City Council. 8. Represents the City Council and City Manager at community meeting's and various employee staff functions. 9. Punctual, regular and reliable attendance is essential for successful job performance. Packet Pg. 199 8.3.e TYPICAL QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge/Skills/Abilities: 1. Knowledge of government systems, processes, procedures. 2. Knowledge of public opinion research techniques and various methods of application in governmental issues. 3. Knowledge of public communication plan development, and the production of support materials. 4. Understands full range of communication and public involvement strategies and how to strategically apply them. 5. Ability to think in an atmosphere of ambiguity or rapidly changing environment. 6. Able to clearly present information sometimes under pressure in large and small groups. 7. Able to serve as a consultant and trainer to staff, boards, neighborhood associations, community groups. 8. Able to gain and maintain confidences of Council and others involved in policy and public processes. 9. Able to effectively work in a team environment; contributes openly, disagrees with respect, understands the ideas of others, listens well, works for consensus, is cognizant of the sense of self worth of others. 10. Able to diplomatically and skillfully intervene in department projects, programs when necessary to provide guidance and training. 11. Respects and understands the role of appointed and elected officials. 12. Good sense of humor. 13. Critical Strategic thinker. 14. Self starter - initiator. 15. Willing to take on tough issues; cool under fire. 16. Politically sensitive, but not politically active. 17. Analytical 18. Works effectively without formal organizational authority. Experience/Education: 1. Three years municipal government experience as part of Chief Executive Officer's team and as strategic advisor to policy -makers, staff, advisory boards and committees, and neighborhoods is required. 2. Demonstrated experience in working with both print and broadcast media and developing outreach tools is required. 3. Superior communication skills (verbal, written, public) and a collaborative and inclusive professional style are required. Packet Pg. 200 8.3.e SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Contacts: 1. The Communications Manager has contact with citizens, staff of all departments, the business community, neighborhood organizations and City Council Members. 2. A great diversity of contacts can be anticipated, varying with the information to be disseminated, and the target audience. 3. Ability to communicate information in a clear, concise manner and in accordance with the listeners frame of reference is required for program success. Supervision: 1. None (May provide direction to staff during project completion). Accountability: 1. The Communications Manager is accountable for enhancing the City's public image through effective public information and media relations programs. 2. This requires the accurate assessment of the intent of the City Council, City Manager and various City departments and translating that intent into an effective presentation, brochure, information campaign, etc. 3. The Communications Manager is accountable for the accuracy and impact of information released. Working Conditions: 1. Mobility sufficient to establish and continue contacts with all community members is required. 2. Duties are frequently performed under the stress of information deadlines, pressure from the public, and/or the press for information on sensitive issues. 3. The conditions encountered will vary depending on the sensitivity and complexity of the information to be disseminated, the format used for dissemination, and the target audience. The City of Olympia is an Equal Opportunity Employer, committed to a diverse workforce. Women, people of color, and people with disabilities are encouraged to apply. CLASS SPEC DATA: FLSA Status - Exempt Pay Grade - 220 Represented - No Packet Pg. 201 8.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/2/2022 CIP-CFP Public Works and CIP-CFP Parks Staff Lead: Council President Olson Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects are identified within the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects which encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects CIP vs. CFP The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City levels of service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. (Source: November 6, 2017 Agenda Memo of Presentation of the Proposed 2018-2023 Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvement Program) Staff Recommendation: N/A Narrative In preparation for the 2023 Budget Cycle, this provides an opportunity for the City Council to discuss the development of the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) for Public Works and Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services. Attachments: Final-2022-2027_CIP_CFP Public Works 2022-2027 Proposed Parks CIP_CFP Packet Pg. 202 Y L 0 i ti N O N N N O N C LL I C 0 E L V R r Q p Packet Pg. 203 8.4.a Index TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP ..................................................... 2 FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECT MAP....................................................................... 3 TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LIST........................................................................4-6 TRANSPORTATION PROJECT SHEETS............................................................. ..7-64 WATER PROJECT LIST..........................................................................................65-66 WATER PROJECT SHEETS....................................................................................67-69 STORMWATER PROJECT LIST............................................................................70-71 STORMWATER PROJECT SHEETS......................................................................72-80 SEWER PROJECT LIST...........................................................................................81-82 SEWER PROJECT SHEETS.....................................................................................83-87 FACILITIES PROJECT LIST...................................................................................88-89 FACILITIES PROJECT SHEETS...........................................................................90-107 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT LIST.................................108-109 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT SHEETS...........................110-113 CIP-CFP COMPARISON(2021-2027).................................................................114-117 a U Packet Pg. 204 1 Public Works & Utilities Department TRANSPORTATION & PW D-04� UTILITY PROJECTS �� WT-28 Projects o Sewer o Stormwater • Street/Intersection Project o Non -Motorized Transportation Project o Water Sewer Street/Intersection Project Non -Motorized Transportation Project PWT-05 PWT-17 • • PWT-24 PWT-03 PWT-09 mPWT-12 PWT-35 PWT- PWT-19 IPWT-16 • PWT-11 PWT-15 -13 IPWT-14 PWT-31 PWT-50 PWS-11 PAM m 0 MMWr��<fflw PWT-10 I � Packet P 205 * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 PWT-2 g' Public Works & Utilities Department FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECTS i OF �F01?oP 9 u St Sprague S ot .N,�4 PWF-01 4 1ziQ WF-07 +� /aa,. tii ✓ ca Q6 I I Edmonds_5 �T r PWF-16� dor '✓abjes� °` PWF,03` 0 Z�r1j��1M� L; • Mai 0-AME.-09 > sell st PWF-10L EWE10 -1 coDayton St c _ low;' N • �� Dayton WIC r St � co N Daytoi IIIP - W F-13 P Q� m,- 004 Q o go . ,, O �'hkMl�� Alder ff U�� ■■� Walnut MEN St Walnut St ,�, t PWF-07 PWI PWF-04 PWF-09 • PWI PWF-03 PWF-10 00 PWF-13 P Projects '1% pmu)-& ge o Facilities I o WWTP N plan MM x-11i i♦ ` ■■� WF-1 � MEN 1 44 1 Midi C AN U� PWF-08 1• —_r.dICI■ �I� lY � * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. Packet P 206 J• 8.4.a TRANSPORTATION Packet Pg. 207 Transportation Projects 8.4.a # CFP PROJECT DP 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL # (2022-2027) (2028-42) Project Cost Preservation / Maintenance Proiects PWT-01 lAnnual Street Preservation Program 76 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,386,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $9,186,000 $0 $9,186,00C PWT-02 84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW 84 $5,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,780 $0 $5,78C PWT-03 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. 78 $1,663,723 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,663,723 $0 $1,663,722 PWT-04 Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 9th Ave. $0 $157,000 $780,000 $0 $0 $0 $937,000 $0 $937,00C PWT-05 Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $450,000 $0 $530,000 $0 $530,OOC PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $150,0001 $700,000 $0 $850,000 $0 $850,OOC PWT-07 Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades sol sol $0 $0 $100,0001 $350,0001 $450,000 $0 $450,OOC Safetv / Canacity Analvsis PWT-08 X 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W Corridor $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 $14,700,000 $0 $14,700,OOC PWT-09 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 80 $7,660,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,660,000 $0 $7,660,OOC PWT-10 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 3 81 $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,930,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 $0 $32,522,000 $0 $32,522,OOC PWT-11 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 4 82 $400,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 $41,001,000 $0 $41,001,00C PWT-12 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $7,044,000 $37,971,000 $45,015,OOC PWT-13 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,217,000 $20,217,00C PWT-14 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,142,000 $38,142,00C PWT-15 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,242,000 $35,242,00C PWT-16 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,072,000 $20,072,00C PWT-17 X SR 524 196th St. SW / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $238,000 $216,000 $720,000 $1,174,000 $0 $1,174,00C PWT-18 X Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $176,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,176,000 $0 $1,176,OOC PWT-19 X 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW - Intersection Improvements 83 $276,902 $387,439 $725,000 $6,881,000 $0 $0 $8,270,341 $0 $8,270,341 PWT-20 SR-104 Adaptive System 86 $150,000 $260,000 $0 $1,955,000 $0 $0 $2,365,000 $0 $2,365,OOC PWT-21 X SR-104 tooth Ave W. Intersection & Access M mt m rovements $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $931,000 $0 $1,091,000 $0 $1,091,000 PWT-22 X SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $450,000 $0 $530,000 $0 $530,OOC PWT-23 X SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements 1 $0 $0 $0 $213,000 $1,219,000 $0 $1,432,000 $0 $1,432,OOC PWT-24 X Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,266,000 $1,266,OOC PWT-25 X 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th St. SW) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,622,000 $16,622,OOC PWT-26 X SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $481,000 $2,750,000 $0 $3,231,000 $0 $3,231,OOC PWT-27 X Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $671,000 $671,OOC PWT-28 175th St Sope Repair $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,OOC PWT-57 2022 Guardrail Program 95 $20,180 $0 sol sol $0 $0 $20,180 $0 $20,18C PWT-58 2022 Traffic Signal Upgrades 88 1 $30,280 $0 sol sol $0 $0 $30,280 1 $0 $30,28C Non -motorized transportation Proiects PWT-29 X 232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 $1,183,000 $1,389,000 $0 $1489,00C N PWT-30 X 236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $227,000 $1,267,000 $1,494,000 $0 $1,494,OOC N PWT-31 X 236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,831,000 $1,831,00C N PWT-32 X 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $640,000 $790,000 $0 $790,OOC p PWT-33 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 $2,894,000 $0 $2,894,00C N PWT-34 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. $0 $0 $0 $597,000 $2,339,000 $0 $2,936,000 $0 $2,936,OOC O C PWT-35 X 218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000 $1,350,000 $1,590,000 $0 $1,590,00C iL PWT-36 X Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave S $0 $0 $0 $265,000 $0 $0 $265,000 $0 $265,00C j.; PWT-37 X 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $200,00C d PWT-38 Citywide Pedestrian Enhancements Project 85 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $t0,00C E PWT-39 X Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project 79 $1,562,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,562,390 $0 $1,562,39C v PWT-40 X Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $2,702,000 $0 $2,702,00C +_ PWT-41 I X 195th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $668,000 $0 $788,000 $0 $788,00C Q PWT-42 X I Railroad St. Walkway from Dayton St. to Main St. / SR-104 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $754,000 $0 $924,000 $0 $924,00( PWT-43 X SR-104 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Trans Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,294,000 $1,294,000 PWT-44 X Downtown Lighting Improvements $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $1,200,000 $0 $1,500,000 PWT-45 X SR-104 Walkway: HAWK to Pine/Pine from SR-104 to 9th $0 $0 $0 $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 $3,290,000 Packet Pg. 208 Transportation Projects 8.4.a # CFP PROJECT DP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028.42) TOTAL Project Cost PWT-46 X 191st St. SW Walkway from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $678,000 $678,OOC PWT-47 X 104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane Walkway from 238th St. SW to 106th $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $1,060,OOC PWT-48 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $324,000 $324,OOC PWT-49 I X 184th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $328,000 $328,OOC d PWT-50 X 238th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,285,000 $1,285,OOC -0 PWT-55 X Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S 93 $901,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $901,780 $0 $901,78C PWT-56 X 2022 Pedestrian Safety Program 87 $20,185 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,185 $0 $20,18E N Ferry Projects i 0 PWT-51 Fx IFerry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St. $0 $0 $0 $357,000 $0 $0 $357,000 $0 $357,00 V Traffic Calming PWT-52 Traffic Calmin Pro ram 94 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $123,130 $0 $123,13C 11 Traffic Planning Projects LLLL PWT-53 I ICitywid.ADA Transition Plan $0 $100,000 $0 $01 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,00C U PWT-54 I I Transportation Plan Update 77 $185,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $185,000 $0 $185,00C d U Total Projects $15,059,350 $8,622,439 $7,953,000 $34,731,000 $46,537,000 $47,988,000 $160,890,789 $177,003,000 $337,893,78E ^ Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028.42) TOTAL (2022-2027) Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal revenue $185,000 $131,000 $156,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $922,000 $0 $922,00C REET Fund 125 $835,199 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $835,199 $0 $835,19S REET Fund 126 $1,382,400 $1,596,000 $1,518,000 $1,518,000 $1,518,000 $1,518,000 $9,050,400 $0 $9,050,40C Transportation Impact Fees $60,000 $75,6091 $343,750 $145,000 $500,000 $0 $1,124,359 $0 $1,124,35E General Fund $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,OOC Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $371,272 $25,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $401,272 $0 $401,272 Federal Grants $936,428 $1,811,830 $1,343,250 $0 $0 $0 $4,091,508 $0 $4,091,50E State Grants $8,700,000 $3,700,000 $2,607,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,007,000 $0 $15,007,OOC Other $2,073,211 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,073,211 $0 $2,073,211 Unsecured Funding$0 $1,268,000 $1,975,000 $32,918,000 $44,369,000 $46,320,000 $126,850,000 -$177,003,0001 $303,853,OOC Total Revenue $15,059,350 $8,622,439 $7,953,000 $34,731,000 $46,537,000 $47,988,000 $160,890,789 $177,003,000 $337,893,78E Packet Pg. 209 Q Project Description Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets. Project Benefit Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steets. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000/ year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $225,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,275,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,236,000 $1,450,000 $1,450,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,386,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,236,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,386,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 N L a �a L O (,i 3 a a u_ U 7 Packet Pg. 210 212TH ST SW r - to 21filn_ sa sw <a � L a 220TH.ST :� LL U a U Project Description T Pavement overlay of 84th Ave. W from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW, with curb ramps upgrades, RRFB's at the o existing crosswalk in front of the Chase Lake Elementary School, and bike lane addition from 215th St. SW to T 212th St. SW on both sides of the street. This project is funded through a secured Federal grant and local funds. o! The project will be completed in fall 2021 and the funding in 2022 is necessary to close-out the project and N complete the grant documents. Project Benefit Improve pavement condition and active transportation safety along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $1,130,000 Design Right of Way Construction $5,780 Expense Total $5,780 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $780 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $5,000 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $5,780 Packet Pg. 211 Q;- w Q �F151i5 Sh 5i4 155th S1 SW rj�,Smm MN .'7 Q Q. W lain PI Sw � �88TWST SW _ 1$d� p1 9W � Penny LP � to � 189uF P7 L ' F4+�de S1 54h' F c 141MI St SW � al lg2m P1 Stir 1920 PF M L P3jr4 1% G 1?J`d PY > 193r sW #51 Nw S t d N 3 a a — LL a U a U Project Description T Pavement overlay of 76th Ave. W from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. with pedestrian curb ramps upgrades, o RRFB's at the proposed crosswalk at 75th PI. W, and possible addition of a bike lane for the northbound T movement. This is a joint project funded by the Cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood, since the west half of the street is in the City of Edmonds and the east half is in the City of Lynnwood. Project Benefit Improve pavement condition, install new Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) for pedestrian safety and upgrade pedestrian curb ramps to meet ADA standards. In addition to the existing southbound bike lane, the project may add a new northbound bike lane as outlined in the City's Transportation Comprehensive Plan. Estimated Project Cost 1,955,000 Design Right of Way Construction $1,663,723 Expense Total $1,663,723 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $274,195 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $639,788 State Grants Other $749,740 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,663,723 Packet Pg. 212 G Edmonds Police and Orvic Pinyfleid Municipal Court Veteran's. Z Plaza Bell[ r IN A Srio•lsle Frances Artdvrson Christian, Science Church LU > i It F N a Yo: � s ■ XD Librar Anderson Par an • � Y �erater 7 L jf : a Cees#er Field LuDavton Project Description � a u_ hdi.11�� U a U Pavement overlay along Main St. from 6th Ave. to 9th Ave. with pedestrian curb ramps upgrades and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) at the existing pedestrian crosswalk at 8th Ave. The project will be funded with a federal grant (funds available in 2023) and City funds for a local match. Project Benefit Improve pavement conditions on this segment of Main St., pedestrian safety with the addition of RRFB's, and pedestrian accessibility with the ADA curb ramp. Estimated Project Cost $937,000 Design $157,000 Right of Way Construction $780,000 Expense Total $157,000 $780,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re $31,000 $156,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $126,000 $624,000 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $157,000 $780,000 Packet Pg. 213 10 a C• PU ET DR P U Project Descriptio The project consists of a complete signal rebuilt, with the removal of all vehicle head currently on spam wire and conversion to standard traffic signal poles with mast arms. Vehicle detention will also be upgraded as part of this project. Project Benefit his upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the vehicle heads aren't fixed while handing on those wires. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that all vehicles will be detected. Estimated Project Cost $530,000 Design $80,000 Right of Way Construction $450,000 Expense Total $80,000 $450,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $80,000 $450,000 Funding Source Total $80,000 $450,000 Packet Pg. 214 11 2381h St SW Faith fJ F Community < Church Project Description Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. Project Benefit _V The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. Estimated Project Cost ,,VJV,VVV Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2311h F! L a �a 0 238th Si $150,000 $700,000 $150,000 $700,000 $150,000 $700,000 $150,000 $700,000 12 Packet Pg. 215 Orackom La nd i ng"t 5avth 0 -f it F dr *4. Railroad `'Sf Si�CiC►t r �ti. � � ' w Edmonds Palici "t and Municipal At ' Court w tvCO Av llateran'! Y li:ni Park r'- Edmonds Centennial Plaza a '�� City HaOellS Hall Playa r_ IFN r .w.- ■ doh s F4UFktain a- �. •� r� MAIN ST a- U U Project Description T Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. o T Project Benefit The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. Y Estimated Project Cost $450,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $100,000 $350,000 $100,000 $350,000 $100,000 $350,000 $100,000 $350,000 13 Packet Pg. 216 Al JL 1 • * ;�; pair} p ! i' it ,? # w+y� F�"�:f*'��} W 1 W1 II• M �_J � 1 A .� art■ 1 # � y ! # L 1L lY Sh SVf ■ Ln {y�.ti t * ��■ i ..{ i; # # ! r tY1r J' two 0, .1 f * s � E PHAN E hMfWo ! i �. Y �i�la =ift Rk'rip {. r A rP SW rho :.'� �* ' ■ � � 5' 1 #`: } ILMr U1 x y A 4F %�Jj I il IL P, do TMT: !=1 Q ME JP �do 6114,J 7�N Rm �0 ��■ r4�r ■„ k k klwh a.t111 R 7 r i ! ¢.A� f* ty i y� • �dt-� i34tli 3t $Vi �ddk'S7 t:k' I.M 1 err i_ J * ##X } ridMiM ' ■. r, �r ytrt�r ■t f*0 7� ��w A Ir -W. j` PM '% � �■ 4 !a •� 3FE1lSraSy} 14 e-q * �i Tti 4+ ,i• * , t Y` _ Jr, �'Iilw �.8 �'� tw'Lr! IF f Zip '. L ;71W 91. .0 J 1211f1la ! * J . •7 �, - 1prr.J.6 le It Project Description Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W to three lanes (with center two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Project Benefit This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this corridor. Community Transit will evaluate the possibility of creating a new east -west bus route along 228th St. SW, if this project moves forward (connecting Edmonds Transit Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station). Estimated Project Cost $14,700,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $700,000 $1,000,000 $12,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,700,000 $12,000,000 14 Packet Pg. 217 6OWZ)0 f 244TH ST S 212THS1_,T_ n w a > 3 t Lu J ? +�D 2 L to Q W Ifs >236TKST SW 244TIA sT SLV Project Description Installation of raised landscaped median along Highway 99 corridor from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW, addition of"Gateway" signage on both ends of the corridor, and a new pedestrian HAWK signal just north of 234th St. SW The project is funded from state funds provided by the Connecting Washington Transportation program. Project Benefit The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a landscaped raised median will improve corridor safety along this Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 35,000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK signal will provide a signalized pedestrian crossing between the existing traffic signals at 238th St and 228th St. Estimated Project Cost 9,033,000 Design Right of Way Construction $7,660,000 Expense Total $7,660,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants $7,660,000 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $7,660,000 a LL U a U 15 Packet Pg. 218 244TH 0 SW z ", to v: J IF I*yI i 5� SW 4 L 'tilts R L`Rr �f J�_.T r. ayy�l�i F� Sa v L a UkK.E,BJ4Ll,lhIGER 4+J�Y W+ LAKE E k,kUNGEF 1 U a U Project Description V T The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to 238th St. SW. The project will construct wider o sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, improved stormwater facilities, targeted utility replacements, A potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments. The Design and right o: of way phases are funded through secured Connecting Washington funds. N L Project Benefit � Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99 corridor. a Estimated Project Cost LL U $32,522,000 a Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $640,000 $2,000,000 $712,000 $1,200,000 $1,218,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,930,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,875,000 $55,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 $640,000 $3,200,000 $1,930,000 $16,000,000 $10,752,000 16 Packet Pg. 219 .4 F i; T se w 222hd Si 5W h isP, y r Project Description fit P1a sw imt- ti t kn ne �UJ _w - (J ' U.JI— z '1 To 0 40 The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 220th St SW to 224th St. SW. The project will construct wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, improved stormwater facilities, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments. The intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St. will be widened to add capacity and improve the level of service. The Design and right of way phases are funded through secured Connecting Washington funds, a federal grant and local transportation impact fees. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved Estimated Project Cost $41,001,000 Design $400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $688,000 Right of Way $500,000 $1,500,000 $2,479,000 = Construction ii $16,000,000 $16,434,000 Expense Total $400,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re v REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Q Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $1,232,000 $348,000 State Grants $400,000 $500,000 $732,000 Unsecured Funding $268,000 $1,920,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 Funding Source Total $400,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,167,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 Packet Pg. 220 17 212TH ST SW 3kh W our 216m a sw iL i.0 T d 0 o a a u_ U U Project Description Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development will be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $45,015,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,580,000 $2,013,000 $1,000,00 $500,000 $2,951,000 $1,000,00 $35,971,OC $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,00 $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,OC $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,00 is Packet Pg. 221 d 0 o a a u_ U U Project Description Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development will be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $45,015,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,580,000 $2,013,000 $1,000,00 $500,000 $2,951,000 $1,000,00 $35,971,OC $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,00 $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,OC $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $37,971,00 is Packet Pg. 221 ;_S.-- f �- 2MI, 51 SW Madknnn Lm 61da `rrt4 Ar swim Of Wi # 235th St~SW M _ {p f d " 8TF4 ST !;Vd I R— d 2�fn, Sr Sw n it 5 .,P Project Description Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $20,217,000 A a LL U d- U Design $2,146,OC ' Right of Way $1,433,OC Construction $16,638,OC Expense Total $20,217,00 i Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $20,217,OC Funding Source Total $20,217,00 Packet Pg. 222 19 ESPERANCE 5-.A _ 1;�*iaf* 228 TH ST SW i 5 i ;sit IF .� Pon a iPh # 4 Ztn 51 9W r — 4 -� r M # A % J dP i l k . �JO it f, x i■ �,..,� Mor- ■rt '3nbn sr sw :�Tureiswt r-M�.h#. r �■� ��` F i l e i � �s 14.4 HrIfV to ��04rt 6+'; 7 * � � 'A * £� I aItY*�K L ! k isIPP ■ra1Aw�l■yM' 234ih h 8W — Project Description W"A 4 W < O � 4 Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 228th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $38,142,000 A Design $4,013,OC Right of Way $5,354,OC Construction $28,775,OC Expense Total $38,142,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $38,142,OC Funding Source Total $38,142,00 Packet Pg. 223 20 ilia 7. i � M} IL *� F. 1W 00 ■ a * 9 2751h as 5:W G' N* am Z a % 44 3 'mmaat�� 225ah Sw k 5 IN -L INN LU HIM A JP 7► sw.. 'k' n A k u� $ 228TH 5T SW Project Description w w t" t 0 It i Jr i- 226TH PL SIN Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 224th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $35,242,000 Design $3,596,OC Right of Way $2,439,OC Construction $29,207,OC Expense Total $35,242,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $35,242,OC Funding Source Total $35,242,00 N a. m 0 3 a a. U_ U 21 Packet Pg. 224 A Project Description Along Hwy 99 from 220th St. SW to 216th St. SW, the project will include wider sidewalks with a planter strip, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $20,072,000 Design $1,866,OC Right of Way $2,036,OC Construction $16,170,OC Expense Total $20,072,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $20,072,OC Funding Source Total $20,072,00 to a �a L O 3 a a U_ U a_ U 22 Packet Pg. 225 7 96TH ST SW Project Descriptio Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW. Estimated Project Cost $1,174, 000 N a �a L O (,i 3 a a LL U a_ U Design $238,000 Right of Way $216,000 Construction $720,000 Expense Total $238,000 $216,000 $720,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re Q REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees $80,000 General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $158,000 $216,000 $7 Packet Pg. 226 23 Funding Source Total $238,000 $216,000 $720,000 geil St z ,� GJ < ■ �ii 41 of CrL _ MAIN ST .4nd�rson U7 Center ti.l Field } Yost Park Project Description Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. Estimated Project Cost $1,176,000 Design $176,000 Right of Way Construction $1,000,000 Expense Total $176,000 $1,000,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees $500,000 General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $176,000 $500,000 Funding Source Total $176,000 $1,000,000 P 24 Packet Pg. 227 7a uo rw -220TH ST SW Z. �. L At +WO m 219th St S;W I .�i 21919 *��e LU 7514 L 421stPIS INCO STARBUCKS Project Description Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right turn lane. Add eastbound and westbound dedicated left turn lanes with a protected -permitted phase. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. (Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, and various utility improvements (invluding potential conversion overhead utility lines to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan). Project Benefit Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. Improve active transportation conditions for pedestrians and bicycle riders. Estimated Project Cost $8,270,341 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Water Utility Fund 421 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $276,902 $287,439 $50,000 $100,000 $675,000 $6,881,000 $276,902 $387,439 $725,000 $6,881,000 $60,000 $75,609 $343,750 $21,062 $25,000 $5,000 $15,840 $15,000 $5,000 $180,000 $271,830 $371,250 $6,881,000 $276,902 $387,439 $725,000 $6,881,000 N L a �a Y 0 3 a a u_ U Packet Pg. 228 25 AIYMr 147 '.' m4h' ga :l1bu,. ut A¢ss Dr Q* fi . - - 71 ►ram k �..• } _•',,arm„ Jilihal vi O Project Description U Installation of an Adaptive System along SR-104 from 236th St. SW to 226th St. SW (total of five traffic signals along this stretch / spaced — % mile from each other). No signal communication currently exists between any of the existing traffic signals. Project Benefit Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 25,000 vehicles per day. Estimated Project Cost $2,365,000 Design $150,000 $260,000 Right of Way Construction $1,955,000 Expense Total $150,000 $260,000 $1,955,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $45,000 REET Fund 126 $78,000 $264,000 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $105,000 $182,000 State Grants Unsecured Funding $1,691,000 Funding Source Total $150,000 $260,000 $1,955,000 Packet Pg. 229 26 QFC PCC NATURAL MARKET 0 ?s gas WALGREEN'S PARIIINO BABE{ N a. EDMONDS WAY eQ o Q Q o v 0 co .r sn a o m rn Gy � i BANK w a a$ ; %, a m as a "° t t a m O *e� IVAR' 2 ELaRTELL•s C:� a r— LL U a Project Description U T Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve o safety to access the driveways within proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the T potential addition of bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve active transportation safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,091,000 Design $160,000 Right of Way Construction $931,000 Expense Total $160,000 $931,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $160,000 $931,000 Funding Source Total $160,000 $931,000 Packet Pg. 230 27 a 2281h Sr SVV PVD Sub Station CL En 7L - � nn di a. a, 28TH2ST SW Vh�estgate �Clia pgl Project Description Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. Estimated Project Cost $530,000 Design $80,000 Right of Way Construction $450,000 Expense Total $80,000 $450,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $80,000 $450,000 Funding Source Total $80,000 $450,000 y Y uw w za y L LU LA LU 3 u_ a u_ U _ a U Packet Pg. 231 28 38TH ST %: N ICaren Presby,t:rAk Church Project Description Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. Estimated Projec ost $1,432,000 Design $213,000 Right of Way Construction $1,219,000 Expense Total $213,000 $1,219,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $213,000 $1,219,000 Funding Source Total $213,000 $1,219,000 a_ U 29 Packet Pg. 232 Seaview Park '0st Office L� LU ia5lh PI SW > l� ir 7841h PI SW e A lo �o a. 01 Y OLYMP(c vitV R Lynndals Park a IL u_ U a Project Description Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). Project Benefit The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B. Estimated Project Cost $1,266,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REST Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total U $213,OC c c c $1,053,OC c c $1,266,00 , $1,266,OC $1,266,00 Packet Pg. 233 30 rr LU a > 220TFI ST SiA, w _J CL CL v 287-H T SW O� u, z N a L a� 2367H sY�� a u_ U d U Project Descriptio T Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this o project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). T d Project Benefit Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation uses by installing a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks, 0 bike lanes and street lighting. Estimated Project CostLL a a $16,622,000 v Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 3: L } W } 4WD 3 �} w 228TH :S t' 2 $2,122,OC c c $14,500,OC c $16,622,00 $16,622,OC $16,622,00 Packet Pg. 234 31 Seattle 243rit PI S _ Z Baptist �r !!-: � Church °' a LLJ EDMONDS WAY LASE BALLINGE R 4A Lake Ballinger a a U a U Project Description Add a second westbound left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Project Benefit Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection. Estimated Project Cost $3,231,000 Design $481,000 Right of Way Construction $2,750,000 Expense Total $481,000 $2,750,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees $65,000 General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $416,000 $2,750,000 Funding Source Total $481,000 $2,750,000 Packet Pg. 235 32 /17 OkVDA LE B 17,W1 St Sl') __V K 7 rd St SW 173rd p1 SVV 1740 St SW 5t. Thomas Moore school Project Description Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13) Project Benefit Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. Estimated Project Cost $671,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total A $109, OC $562,OC $671,00 $671,OC $671,00 33 Packet Pg. 236 Project Descriptio — a The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the damaged pavement on 175th St. SW. Project Benefit r Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment. Estimated Project Cost $1,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction $1,000,000 Expense Total $1,000,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $1,000,000 Funding Source Total $1,000,000 Packet Pg. 237 34 ESPER.ANC-F-, VIE x �... s f — �-4 f Im 3M 'A" Project Description Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,389,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $206,000 $1,183,000 $206,000 $1,183,000 $206,000 $1,183,000 $206,000 $1,183,000 35 Packet Pg. 238 236th Si SUA maarona Elementary Project Descriptio Aff Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Projec ost $1,494,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $227,000 $1,267,000 $227,000 $1,267,000 $227,000 $1,267,000 $227,000 $1,267,000 a_ U 36 Packet Pg. 239 3, W < ,. 4 L o < a � d U Project Description ., Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of c the 2015 Transportation Plan. A Project Benefit d This project would improve pedestrian safety. 0 Estimated Projec ost $1,831,000 Design $264,OC Right of Way Construction $1,567,OC Expense Total $1,831,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $1,831,OC Funding Source Total $1,831,00 Packet Pg. 240 37 16 0 w _ �+ �i#}bass *- ! ■ #� 0 J3 81.141 :, 'y F �- t'LvhFC 13 A N 238 rimn ESPERANCE w. _Ni . ac A. 1 f ECMtiunl: AP HALI Christ z; y�l 111 �Ifl4¢■ _ . Lutheran ,,,,hrn = CMIST LUTHERA N a 3 S y {'R1FCM Church vs -n ell I.II r . perk and Ride ?''' E a7G@23 1 Ch 2HO? Wm ■ 111111 2Sd15 G R ,t AURORA MARKETPLACE U reWILY h4ni.n�i u seoQn Project Description Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 238th St .SW to 234th St. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $790,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $150,000 $640,000 $150,000 $640,000 $150,000 $640,000 $150,000 $640,000 a P N a� U Packet Pg. 241 38 (YNNWOOD`,,,,, 1, EDMONDS A a u_ U U Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids due to proximity of several schools). Estimated Project Cost $2,894,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 $209,000 $209,000 $2,476,000 39 Packet Pg. 242 It iL' C LYC rS N ' � L a LYNNWOOD N u_ U a U Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $2,936,000 Design $597,000 Right of Way Construction $2,339,000 Expense Total $597,000 $2,339,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $597,000 $2,339,000 Funding Source Total $597,000 $2,339,000 Packet Pg. 243 40 Chase Lake Elementary Chase Lake School } Edmonds Church of'God .' i 6tlt St SVV Edmonds Woodway High School wadisi Edmond LIJ �I a �a Y 0 PROM MOREft� L JtJ1 514' N 3 a a u_ U ' a Project Description T Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 0 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. w d Project Benefit The improvements will improve pedestrian safety. 0 Estimated Project Cost $1,590,000 a a Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 0TH ST SW $240,000 $1,350,000 $240,000 $1,350,000 $240,000 $1,350,000 $240,000 $1,350,000 Packet Pg. 244 41 BECK'S GPEGORY THE MAMNER LU COMMODORE t dw 111 �} wG 4 Holly or ,5 Project Description Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S. Project Benefit This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch. Estimated Project Cost $265,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total miq alp 1 L M a �a 0 Cedar a� a u_ U a U $40, 000 $225,000 $265,000 $265,000 $265,000 Packet Pg. 245 42 ANT N no z- � �T ' t rS I� Swedish F_dmil ndc 216?11 st SW EDMONDS MEDICAL PAIILlOIV 21645 KRUGE:R CLINIC EN'S E F� MCDONALD'S VALUE Q VILLAGE <.' Project Descriptio Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of 216th St. SW). This project ranked #3 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). Project Benefit To provide a safe and desirable walking route. Estimated Project Cost $200,000 Design $20,000 Right of Way Construction $180,000 Expense Total $200,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $200,000 Funding Source Total $200,000 N a m 0 a a a U a U 43 Packet Pg. 246 Project Description Complete pedestrian crossing enhancements with the installation of RRFB's at (7) intersections (Walnut St. @ 8th Ave. S, SR-524 @ Brookmere, 106th Ave. W @ 229th PI. SW, Main St. @ Olympic Ave., 76th Ave W @ 206th St. SW, Dayton @ 2nd Ave. S, and Dayton St. @ Private Drive ), a new traffic signal at SR-104 @ 232nd St. SW, and a HAWK signal at SR-524 @ 84th Ave. W. Design, right of way and construction phases are funded through a federal grant, TIB state grant and local funds. Project Benefit Improve pedestrian safety by increasing driver yielding compliance for pedestrians waiting to cross at a marked crosswalk and safer crossing along SR-104 and SR-524 with higher speeds and longer crossing distances through signal and HAWK signal. Estimated Project Cost $2,145,000 Design Right of Way Construction $10,000 Expense Total $10,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $820 REET Fund 126 $2,230 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $310 Federal Grants $6,640 Other Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $10,000 U Packet Pg. 247 Project Description Installation of bike lanes or sharrows along various street segments as identified on the Proposed Bike Facilities map of 2015 Transportation Plan. Bike lanes or sharrows will be added along 100th St. SW / 9th Ave. from 244th St. SW to Walnut St, Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave. to 84th Av., 228th St. SW from 80th Ave. to 78th Ave., and 80th Ave. from 228th St. SW to 220th St. SW. Project Benefit This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout the City (such as schools, parks, Downtown, Sound Transit Station...). Sound Transit awarded the grant to fund improvements that will provide more convenient access so that more people can use Sound Transit services. Estimated Project Cost 2,100,000 Design Right of Way Construction $1,562,390 Expense Total $1,562,390 Other $1,323,471 $0 $0 $0 $0 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $238,919 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,562,390 $0 $0 $1 $0 45 N - L a kp� V $0 $ Packet Pg. 248 CASPIRs T Z w w ff+ G J CL MAIN ST a v_ U a U Project Description Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (— 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). Project Benefit Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school. Estimated Project Cost $2,702,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 $201,000 $201,000 $2,300,000 Packet Pg. 249 46 220TH ST SVJ O# rr .rr • 0. tA �s + f L 3r F 3 1 I* 2 �•� y # ; Z Voi a. A LL � t r � U Project Description U Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost Design $120,000 Right of Way Construction $668,000 Expense Total $120,000 $668,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $120,000 $668,000 Funding Source Total $120,000 $668,000 Packet Pg. 250 47 Puget Sound Fishing Pi@r Olympic Beach Park Restro D m Washington State Ferry T2rmT vial Bracketts Landing South •� 4 Railroad Station 4N/ Past Office Mini Park CO ►i z City of Edmonds V < B 3 a � CL � � v a U Project Description ., Install new and wider sidewalk along Railroad Ave from Dayton St. to SR-104. c .y Project Benefit Improve active transportation safety along Railroad Ave from Dayton St. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to Y various destination points (such as Waterfront Center, Port of Edmonds, Downtown Edmonds, WSDOT Ferry 0 Terminal...). 3 a a LL $924,000 v Design $170,000 Right of Way Construction $754,000 Expense Total $170,000 $754,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $170,000 $754,000 Funding Source Total $170,000 $754,000 Packet Pg. 251 Seattle .. flap#ist Church W Lake Ballinger OAI b WA Y � FDMONDS WAIF LACE BALD GER WA A Project Descripti ila Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps. Project Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail and across SR-104. Estimated Project Cost $1, 294,000 Design $238,OC Right of Way Construction $1,056,OC Expense Total $1,294,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $1,294,OC Funding Source Total $1,294,00 Packet Pg. 252 or _ Project Description N L a �a L O (,i 3 a a u_ U Installation of street lights along various streets within Downtown Edmonds. Project Benefit This project will add new street lighting in Downtown to improve pedestrian safety at night. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000 Design $300,000 Right of Way Construction $1,200,000 Expense Total $300,000 $1,200,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $300,000 $1,200,000 Funding Source Total $300,000 $1,200,000 Packet Pg. 253 50 Edmonds Marsh � cra z 0 W w 4-- z m rc s ,� LAY ❑WOn _.- _ F V) .JJ Project Description Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to Pine St and along Pine St from SR-104 to 9th Ave S Project Benefit This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds and City Park. Estimated Project Cost $3,290,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 $327,000 $327,000 $2,636,000 a LL U a U 51 Packet Pg. 254 Sierra Park un m ❑0 2 o 0 z Oz u, Project DescriptiAom Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $678,000 Design $100,00 Right of Way Construction $578,00 Expense Total $678,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $678,OG Funding Source Total $678,00 Packet Pg. 255 52 4 LA i=::. n C LU 23Nh wl SW Edmonds Memorial Com etery Salem Edmonds l uth@ran Helghts Church K-12 Scrilorl rk High chooE Ak.qP L a w' = 236 i�K. Pr' Svy o F Fkk� u_ Community U Church a U Project Description T Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked o #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. T Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,060,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $160,oa ' $900,00 $1,060,00 $1, 060, 00 $1,060,00 53 Packet Pg. 256 46, " 1� •wow— 2191;k1 St 5w 1 .a a_ L r— 0TH ST SW Edmond} Church of C,od Project Description ir Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Projec ost $324,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total A 0- u_ U d- U $59,OC ' $265,OC $324,00 $324,OC $324,00 54 Packet Pg. 257 4 Ln im seaview 1=lmmantai 19151h St SW L 1871h St SV� a� O L O 188ih St SW low A 3 a CL v ;d U Project Description ., Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Projec ost $328,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $50,OC $278,OC $328,00 $328,0c $328,00 55 Packet Pg. 258 � OC -Kr Q, G O lathay Ballinger Park f r r Project Description Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,285,000 Design $187,OC N a LL U a U Right of Way r Construction c $1,098,OC Expense Total $1,285,00 c Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re i s REET Fund 125 u REET Fund 126 = Transportation Impact Fees i General Fund s Y Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $1,285,OC Funding Source Total $1,285,00 Packet Pg. 259 56 Pugel Sound vl {r.to LU a Edmonds Marsh Project Description JV Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users. Project Benefit Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways. Estimated Project Cost $357,000 Design Right of Way Construction $357,000 Expense Total $357,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $357,000 Funding Source Total $357,000 a LL U a U 57 Packet Pg. 260 N L a �a L O (,i 3 a a u_ U Project Description Install traffic calming devices (such as Radar Feedback signs, speed cushions, or other elements). Project Benefit Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming Policy. Estimated Project Cost $33,130 for 2022 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 Packet Pg. 261 "fir�J P 3 a a 1 U Project Description The Plan identifies all existing ADA deficiencies within the City Right of Way (such as non -compliant ADA curb ramps, tripping hazards within sidewalk, non -compliant ADA driveways, and signalized intersection without Audible Pedestrian Signals (APS). Project Benefit Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way. Estimated Project Cost $100,000 Design $100,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $100,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re $100,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $100,000 Packet Pg. 262 59 Project Description Update the City's long range transportation plan. Project Benefit Estimated Project Cost $185,000 Design $185,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $185,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re $185,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $185,000 a U Packet Pg. 263 Ln 9J Sea Vista p5. 7#h and w Elm Paris Q 2 DTI ST SW ruu . o Project Description The walkway project is ranked #6 on the short walkway list from the 2015 Transportation Plan. The project will install approximately 700 feet of new sidewalk, six pedestrian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater system on Elm Way between 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S. Project Benefit The project will improve pedestrian safety and provide a missing link of sidewalk on Elm Way between 8th Ave and 9th Ave. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction $901,780 Expense Total $901,780 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $551,880 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $349,900 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $901,780 N L a �a 0 a a a U a U 61 Packet Pg. 264 Project Description Jw Addition of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) and/or flashing LED lights around regulatory signs at selected locations throughout the City. Project Benefit Improve safety at pedestrian crossings. Estimated Project Cos $20,000/year Design Right of Way Construction $20,185 Expense Total $20,185 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $20,185 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $20,185 no 62 Packet Pg. 265 Project Description J Install guardrails along selected stretches throughout the City with steep drop-off and other safety issues. Project Benefit Improve safety of City transportation system. Estimated Project Cost 520,000/year Design Right of Way Construction $20,180 Expense Total $20,180 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $20,180 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $20,180 L a c m 0 2 3 a a u_ U a_ U 63 Packet Pg. 266 Project Description Upgrade traffic signal equipment at selected signalized intersections with new equipment within signal cabinet, new vehicular detection, new vehicle heads, and/or new pedestrian heads. Project Benefit Improve reliability of traffic signal operation. Estimated Project Cost $30,000/year Design Right of Way Construction $30,280 Expense Total $30,280 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal re REET Fund 125 $30,280 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $30,280 a_ U Packet Pg. 267 64 8.4.a WATER Packet Pg. 268 65 8.4.a Water Proiects # CFP PROJECT OP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWW-01 Phase 12 Annual Replacement Program 2022 50 $2,159,412 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,159,412 $2,159,412 PWW-02 Phase 13 Annual Replacement Program 2023 46 $486,661 $3,389,788 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,876,449 $3,876,449 PWW-03 Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program 2024 $0 $506,128 $3,525,379 $0 $0 $0 $4,031,507 $4,031,507 PWW-04 I I Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program 2025 $0 $0 $526,373 $3,666,379 $0 $0 $4,192,7521 $4,192,752 PWW-05 Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program 2026 $0 $0 $0 $547,428 $3,813,034 $0 $4,360,462 $4,360,462 PWW-06 Phase 17 Annual Replacement Program 2027 $0 $0 $0 $0 $569,325 $3,965,555 $4,534,880 $4,534,880 PWW-07 Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program 2028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $592,098 $592,098 $592,098 PWW-08 2022 Waterline Overlays 49 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 PWW-09 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment 47 $505,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $505,000 $505,000 Total Projects $3,326,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $24,427,560 $0 $24,427,560 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Y027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (2022-2027) (2028-42) Water Fund - 421 $3,326,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $24,427,560 $24,427,560 Total Revenue $3,326,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $24,427,560 $0 $24,427,560 Packet Pg. 269 66 1 N L a �a L O (,i 3 a a u_ U U Project Description Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone to breakage due to its material properties. Project Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $2.9 to $4.5 million/year Design $486,661 $506,128 $526,373 $547,428 $569,325 $592,098 Right of Way Construction $2,159,412 $3,389,788 $3,525,379 $3,666,379 $3,813,034 $3,965,555 Expense Total $2,646,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 Water Fund 421 $2,646,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 Funding Source Total $2,646,073 $3,895,916 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 Packet Pg. 270 67 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Waterline Replacement Projects. Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Waterline Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost $175,000 Design $30,000 Right of Way Construction $145,000 Expense Total $175,000 Water Fund 421 $175,000 Funding Source Total $175,000 Packet Pg. 271 185th P[ SW -, LL S 18151h PI SW view 00 00 Water Tank A LIa' k OW Project Description Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the project will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone to breakage due to its material properties. This work is being done to provide an in detail evaluation of the condition of our two underground potable water storage reservoirs. Findings will be used to determine costs and next steps for any future needed maintenance or repairs. Project Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost TBD Design Right of Way Construction $505,000 Expense Total $505,000 Water Fund 421 $505,000 Funding Source Total $505,000 a_ U Packet Pg. 272 8.4.a STORMWATER Y L a c R Y L O V 7 IL a u_ U d U c 0 .N a� o: Y L O c,> IL a u_ U I IL_ U ti I N O N N N O N R U- r_ d E L V fC r r Q Packet Pg. 273 70 8.4.a Stormwater Projects DP TOTAL TOTAL # CFP PROJECT 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 # (2022-2027) (2028-42) Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Related Projects PWD-01 I X Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements 551 $190,000 $1,230,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,420,840 $0 Perrinville Creek Basin Proiects PWD-03 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects 60 $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $621,542 $0 PWD-04 X Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration (Phase 1) 53 $550,000 $150,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 PWD-05 X Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 59 $555,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $555,000 $0 Storm Drainage Improvement Proiects PWD-06 Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design Phase 54 $300,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 PWD-07 X Ballinger Regional Facility Construction Phase $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 PWD-08 Green Street & Rain Gardens 1 61 $400,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 Annually Funded Proiects PWD-09 2022 SD Overlays 57 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 PWD-10 Phase 3 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2022) 58 $1,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,450,000 $0 PWD-11 Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2023) 52 $312,000 $1,622,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,934,400 $0 PWD-12 Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2024) 1$0 $324,480 $1,687,296 $0 $0 $0 $2,011,776 $0 PWD-13 Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2025) $0 $0 $337,460 $1,754,786 $0 $0 $2,092,246 $0 PWD-14 Phase 7 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2026) $0 $0 $0 $350,958 $1,824,977 $0 $2,175,935 $0 PWD-15 Phase 8 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2027) $E0 $0 $0 $0 $364,996 $1,897,976 $2,262,972 $0 PWD-16 Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2028) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,5961 $379,596 $0 Compliance Related Projects PWD-17 I IStorm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan 56 1 $300,000 $0 $0 1$0 1$0 1$0 $300,000 $0 Total Projects $4,238,542 $4,277,720 $10,924,756 $2,205,744 $2,289,973 $2,377,572 $26,314,307 $0 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $ 2,457,292 $ 2,363,880 $ 3,774,756 $ 41205,744 $ 4,289,973 $ 2,377,572 $ 19,469,217 $ - Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants $ 6717250 $ 723,840 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,395,090 $ - Unsecured Grants $ 15110,000 $ 1,790,000 $ 7,750,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ - $ 22,650,000 $ - Total Revenue $ 41238,542 $ 4,877,720 $ 11,524,756 $ 10,205,744 $ 101289,973 $ 2,377,572 $ 43,514,307 $ - a_ U 71 Packet Pg. 274 Edmonds Marsh RJniup Qf, O Edmonds Marsh Project Descriptio Feasibility documents for the Willow Creek Daylighting project identified some areas of concern for water quality of stormwater entering the Marsh. Additionally, new research has identified a chemical in tire production causing pre -spawn mortality in salmon, further cementing the linkage between vehicle traffic and poor water quality for fish habitat. By improving the water quality inputs of stormwater, the future marsh can provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. This project was previously included in the 2021 budget as only a "Phase 1" project specific to the west side of SR-104. However, with additional funding identified, staff propose to expand this effort to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges directly into the marsh form SR-104 and Harbor Square. Project Benefit Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the west portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000 Design $190,000 $10,000 Right of Way Construction $1,220,840 Expense Total $190,000 $1,230,840 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $104,500 Federal Grants State Grants $30,000 $536,340 Unsecured Grants $160,000 $590,000 Funding Source Total $190,000 $1,230,840 Packet Pg. 275 72 Project Descriptio Reducing scouring flows in order to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The projects funded by this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish habitat. These effort have become even more critical given recent challenges around the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for implementing projects within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff flexibility to respond to ad -hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available for chasing grant applications for flow reductions projects. Project Benefit The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and decrease creek bed scour during peak flow events. Estimated Project Cost $100,000/year Design $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Right of Way Construction $111,542 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 Expense Total $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $121,542 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,001 Packet Pg. 276 73 Project Description The City has struggled to manage the undersized outfall system at Perrinville Creek; the current combination of creek alignment, sedimentation, and undersized culverts creates several issues which make the creek unsustainable as a natural system. The concern must be addressed from the bottom of the creek up in order to sequence the relief of the numerous concerns correctly. A future phase would replace the culvert under Talbot Road as well. The improvements are needed to relieve current flooding, ease City maintenance needs, and provide better and more sustainable fish habitat. This project will build on any interim improvements which staff are able to complete in 2021. The project would include a new culvert under BNSF right-of-way which is fully compliant with current flood management and fish passage regulations. The project will include many stakeholders and likely include a minimum 2-year design and development phase before being ready for construction. Project Benefit The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish passage. Estimated Project Cost $5,500,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $550,000 $100,000 $50,000 $2,800,000 $550,000 $150,000 $2,800,000 $550,000 $150,000 $2,800,000 $550,000 $150,000 $2,800,000 74 Packet Pg. 277 Po s'. EL Office S&a- -),v Park cn 7851h 81 SVv 3: J Ik lu � N L 1 R6th s7t 5W ° kt a Ti a u_ cc_ U a U Project Descriptio T Reducing scouring flows in order to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin o report completed in 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by h urban development. The project is an incremental step toward recovering this stream run as an adequate fish o: habitat. The grant for this project has already been secured. This project proposes construction of an infiltration N system in Seaview Park, almost identical to the successful Phase 1 project which was completed in 2019, in order 0 to infiltrate more runoff in the Perrinville Creek basin. 3: Project Benefit Decrease peak storm flows in the Perrinville Creek basin to help normalize flows within Perrinville Creek and decrease potential of scour within the Creek. Estimated Project Cost $742,000 Design $60,000 Right of Way Construction $495,000 Expense Total $555,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $138,750 Federal Grants State Grants $416,250 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $555,000 75 Packet Pg. 278 Mathay Ballinger Park 'r94 240Ih PI SW L rLco f� - 242 nd SI S Project Descriptiois t� W tq 241st ST FVV � w L O Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flooding & seasonal algae blooms along with other water quality impairments. The Highway 99 corridor is an area of high development, including a future City project which will require stormwater mitigation. By creating a regional facility, the City can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development, addressed stormwater mitigation needs for the future Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger pollution generating areas. The City can drastically improve Lake Ballinger water quality. The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. This phase is limited to design and production of plans and specifications; construction phase will be tracked as separate project (to ease and simplify grant management/reporting). Project Benefit The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. Estimated Project Cost $550,000 Design $300,000 $250,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $300,000 $250,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $75,000 $62,500 Federal Grants State Grants $225,000 $187,500 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $300,000 $250,000 _ 3 a U 76 Packet Pg. 279 Mathay Ballinger Park Ld — n3l yy }y.., [y` 240th Pa S','- - f 1b C Y l'- '�` % EL 242od S# 5vv Project Description Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flooding & seasonal algae blooms along with other water quality impairments. The Highway 99 corridor is an area of high development, including a future City project which will require stormwater mitigation. By creating a regional facility, the City can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development, addressed stormwater mitigation needs for the future Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger pollution generating areas. The City can drastically improve Lake Ballinger water quality. This phase is limited to the construction phase and will be tracked as separate project (to ease and simplify grant management/reporting) Project Benefit The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction $6,000,000 Expense Total $6,000,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $1,500,000 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants $4,500,000 Funding Source Total $6,000,000 N a i O a a u_ U a U 77 Packet Pg. 280 Project Descriptio City forays into green stormwater infrastructure elements have been limited, but with good success. Continuing to implement such projects will allow us to proactively make improvements to the conditions of the City drainage system and will help reduce flooding. This project proposes to implement green stormwater elements, such as rain garden and bioretention, throughout the City. Staff will leverage opportunities with other projects, communication with property owners, and historical knowledge/experience to identify and selected locations where green infrastructure can be implemented with relative ease or efficiency. Staff proposes to implement this effort as a series of small work projects over the next several years. Project Benefit Improvements to the City drainage systems using raingardens and green infrastructure resulting in reduced flooding and a reduction to peak stormwater flows. Estimated Project Cost $1,000,000 Design $75,000 $100,000 Right of Way Construction $325,000 $500,000 Expense Total $400,000 $600,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants $400,000 $600,000 Funding Source Total $400,000 $600,000 Packet Pg. 281 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Annual Storm Maintenance Projects. Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Storm Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost $60,000 Design $9,000 Right of Way Construction $51,000 Expense Total $60,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $60,000 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $60,000 79 Packet Pg. 282 a U Project Description Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or rehab storm drain infrastructure in several locations throughout the City. Locations of work identified by City crews and staff via first had knowledge or video inspection results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its lifespan and requires routine replacement or repair in order to preserve the function of the storm drain system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase chances of a storm drain system failure. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs Estimated Project Cost $1.8 to $2.3 million/year Design $312,000 $324,480 $337,460 $350,958 $364,996 $379,596 Right of Way Construction $1,450,000 $1,622,400 $1,687,296 $1,754,786 $1,824,977 $1,897,976 Expense Total $1,762,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $1,762,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 Funding Source Total $1,762,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 Packet Pg. 283 8.4.a Sewer Proiects # CFP PROJECT OP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWS-01 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements, (2022) 65 $1,606,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,606,550 $1,606,550 PWS-02 Phase 10 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2023) 62 $336,074 $1,889,212 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,225,286 $2,225,286 PWS-03 Phase 11 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2024) $0 $349,517 $1,964,780 $0 $0 $0 $2,314,297 $2,314,297 PWS-04 Phase 12 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2025) $0 $0 $363,498 $2,043,372 $0 $0 $2,406,8701 $2,406,870 PWS-05 Phase 13 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2026) $0 $0 $0 $378,038 $2,125,107 $0 $2,503,145 $2,503,145 PWS-06 Phase 14 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2027) $0 $0 $0 $0 $393,160 $2,210,111 $2,603,271 $2,603,271 PWS-07 Phase 15 Annual Sewer Repl/Rehab/Improvements (2028) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $408,886 $408,886 $408,886 PWS-08 1 12021 SS Overlays 64 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 PWS-09 I I Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 4 63 $482,258 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $482,258 $482,258 PWS-10 I IAnnual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation $0 $501,549 $521,6111 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 $2,716,550 $2,716,550 PWS-11 1 1 Lake Ballinger Sewer $0 $1,000,0001 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Total Projects $2,484,882 $3,740,278 $7,849,889 $2,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $23,327,113 $0 $23,327,113 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (2022-2027) (2028-42) Sewer Fund -423 $2,484,882 $3,740,278 $7,849,889 $2,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $23,327,113 $23,327,113 Total Revenue $2,484,882 $3,740,278 $7,849,889 $2,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $23,327,113 $0 $23,327,113 Packet Pg. 285 82 N L a �a L O (,i 3 a a u_ U Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due to its material properties. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $2.0 to $2.6 million/year Design $336,074 $349,517 $363,498 $378,038 $393,160 $408,886 Right of Way Construction $1,606,550 $1,889,212 $1,964,780 $2,043,372 $2,125,107 $2,210,111 Expense Total $1,942,624 $2,238,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 Water Fund 423 $1,942,624 $2,238,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 Funding Source Total $1,942,624 $2,238,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 Packet Pg. 286 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost $60,000 Design $12,000 Right of Way Construction $48,000 Expense Total $60,000 Water Fund 423 $60,000 Funding Source Total $60,000 Packet Pg. 287 Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $482,258 Design $72,338 Right of Way Construction $409,920 Expense Total $482,258 Water Fund 423 $482,258 Funding Source Total $482,258 a_ U Packet Pg. 288 Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $500,000 to $590,000/year Design $75,232 $78,241 $81,371 $84,626 $88,011 Right of Way Construction $426,317 $443,370 $461,104 $479,548 $498,730 Expense Total $501,549 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 Water Fund 423 $501,549 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 Funding Source Total $501,549 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 Packet Pg. 289 tSVLKANU- W � r na 238TH ST SW 244TH ST SVO A. rn Lake Ballifig�� » 4 sw den M W ul+�i s /[M 235TH PL SW 236TH ST. Ruj 4YAY LAKF 'BA LLrNGER WAY -.:�244:TH;STa {WL:7 Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the sewer pipe along Lake Ballinger will require additional flow capacity in the near future. These improvements are needed to account for population growth, reduce Infiltration and Inflow from the pipe and improve maintenance and emergency access for this major trunk system. Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Improved access will help ease maintenance and access for emergencies, which will further decease any chance of potential sewer spills into Lake Ballinger. Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Water Fund 423 Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 a u_ U a U Packet Pg. 290 8.4.a FACILITIES Packet Pg. 291 8.4.a Facilities Proiects # CFP PROJECT OP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWF-01 Boys and Girls Club $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $186,549 $0 $186,549 PWF-02 Cemetery Building $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $17,112 $0 $17,112 PWF-03 City Hall $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 $1,103,350 $0 $1,103,350 PWF-04 I I Fishing Pier 1 $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,9181 $5,628 $1,043 $32,870 $0 $32,870 PWF-05 I Frances Anderson Center $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $805,751 $0 $805,751 PWF-06 IFS 16 $24,970 $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $205,377 $0 $205,377 PWF-07 I FS 17 $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 $641,678 $0 $641,678 PWF-08 I FS 20 $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $241,029 $0 $241,029 PWF-09 IHistoric Log Cabin $7,903 $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $97,167 $0 $97,167 PWF-10 I Historical Museum $12,121 $13,0891 $15,000 $10,000 $4,6211 $10,199 $65,029 $0 $65,029 PWF-11 Library $45,000 $105,1751 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $434,441 $0 $434,441 PWF-12 Meadowdale Club House $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $59,464 $0 $59,464 PWF-13 Old Public Works $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $262,205 $0 $262,205 PWF-14 Parks Maint. Building $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $270,495 $0 $270,495 PWF-15 Public Safety $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $1,558,144 $0 $1,558,144 PWF-16 Public Works O&M $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $628,697 $0 $628,697 PWF-17 WadeJames Theater $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $320,860 $0 $320,860 PWF-18 Yost Pool House $25,0001 $65,5701 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $174,623 $0 $174,623 Total Projects $1,188,429 $1,205,800 $1,924,741 $900,120 $711,762 $1,173,988 $7,104,840 $0 $7,104,840 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $388,076 $111,454 $126,656 $117,964 $106,361 $122,520 $973,031 $0 $973,031 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $800,353 $1,094,345 $1,798,085 $48,325 $0 $0 $3,741,108 $0 $3,741,108 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $0 $0 $0 $30,453 $0 $0 $30,453 $0 $30,453 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $703,3791 $605,401 $1,051,4671 $2,360,2471 $0 $2,360,247 Total Revenue $1,188,429 $1,205,799 $1,924,741 $900,121 $711,762 $1,173,987 $7,104,839 $0 $7,104,839 Packet Pg. 292 N M a P a a U_ U a U Project Description This building built in 1900 was the original field house for Edmonds High School. The property located at Civic Field and is not part of the large Civic Field Park restoration project. The building is solely operated by the Snohomish County Boys and Girls Club in partnership with the City's Parks and Recreation department. The building has significant need for major renovations if it is expected to be in operation for another 10 years. Renovation and deferred maintenance may eclipse the building value in its current location. Projects: Exterior plumbing access, Window replacement, Roof replacement, Siding replacement, ADA Access, Plumbing replacement, Front entry door replacement, Fire Alarm System new installation, Fire Sprinkler updates, Baseboard heating replacement Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $186,549 Construction\Professional Services $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 Expense Total $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $6,000 $6,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $30,151 $32,034 $20,733 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $30,453 Unsecured Funding $25,077 $8,101 Funding Source Total $36,151 $38,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 Packet Pg. 293 Project Descriptio M This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the cemetery Sextant office. The building is in relatively good condition and has little deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be needed as technology dictates. Projects: Minor repair and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $455 $1,954 $2,094 $2,000 $2,000 $818 $6,414 $1,377 $455 $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 91 Packet Pg. 294 16 Project Description City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until the City purchased and renovated the building in the 1990s. The City has operated Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. The building is in near original condition and is in need of substantial repair and maintenance. Projects: Solar utilization and cool roof engineering scope, HVAC upgrades and equipment replacements, Electrical Service replacement, Plumbing and drain pipe replacement, Restroom remodels w/gender neutral consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and replacement, Lobby remodel, Main Entry Awning re -glazing, Interior Painting, ADA accessibility improvements, Whole building generator installation Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $1,103,350 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 $15,000 $15,000 $18,000 $156,463 $264,064 $305,246 $171,463 $279,064 $323,246 $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 $18,000 $20,000 $20,000 $132,000 $50,949 $88,628 $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 92 Packet Pg. 295 o Project Description a_ U The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Ranger Office is a 1200 square foot office and restroom facility located near the east end of the pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operate out of this facility. Projects:, Electrical panel and pier electrical feed replacement, Minor repairs and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $32,870 Construction\Professional Services $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 Expense Total $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $5,000 $2,971 $2,918 $2,500 $1,043 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $5,320 $4,991 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $3,128 Funding Source Total $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 Packet Pg. 296 93 Project Description The Frances Anderson Center is housed in the 1928 Edmonds elementary school building. This building serves as the Parks, Recreation, Cultural and Human Services offices and is on the City's Historic Register. The Building is nearly 55,000 square feet and is home to several permanent tenants including, Main Street Kids daycare, Edmonds Montessori, Sno-King Youth Organization and the Olympic Ballet practice space and offices. The building serves as the City's main recreation center offering arts, athletic and cultural programing year round. Due to the age and high usage of the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or restoration. Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add ventilation, cooling and heating, Replacement of all exterior doors (24 ea), New, ADA accessible door closures, New Windows (historically appropriate), Interior painting Classrooms , Plumbing drainage collector, Gym Floor, Drinking fountains ADA compliant, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures, Replacement of several common area and classroom flooring, Addition of building security card readers , Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Alarm replacement, Fire Sprinkler replacement, Elevator refresh and code updates Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $805,751 Construction\Professional Services $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 Expense Total $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $20,000 $20,000 $25,000 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $25,000 $15,000 $30,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $123,925 $110,593 $273,378 Packet Pg. 297 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Project Description 8.4.a $73,892 $5,934 $83,029 $143,925 $130,593 $298,378 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 This facility is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue and was built in 2003 and has a building area of 10,700 square feet. The building is in fair condition and will require some infrastructure updates or replacements to remain operationally ready for the needs of the City. Projects: Roll -up bay door replacements, HVAC unit replacements, Gutter and drainage repair or replacements, Building Controls updates , Interior painting and flooring Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $205,377 Construction\Professional Services $24,970 $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 Expense Total $24,970 $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $5,000 $1,591 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $19,970 $42,689 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $61,388 $22,107 $23,631 Funding Source Total $24,970 $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 Packet Pg. 298 95 LNa M 62- - - - O -} V 3 _ a u_ .LL U U Project Description This building is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue, was built in 1999 and has a building area of 9,800 square feet. This building has had some updates but will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain operationally ready. Projects: Bay Door replacements, Drainage updates, Electrical infrastructure updates, HVAC Chiller plant replacement, Interior Painting and flooring Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 $5,000 $5,000 $8,000 $8,000 $5,000 $5,000 $34,935 $76,545 $217,547 $136,830 $22,575 $117,245 $39,935 $81,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 $122,245 Packet Pg. 299 96 Project Description This building is the eldest of the City's three fire stations and is operated by South County Fire and Rescue. This station serves Esperance and supports the other two fire stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. The building has had significant updates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior and HVAC system updates. Projects: New engine bay doors, Fire alarm system replacement, New property perimeter fencing, Storm water drainage system, Interior painting and flooring Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $241,029 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $13,460 $16,500 $12,774 $16,960 $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $89,248 $64,782 $18,765 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 97 Packet Pg. 300 Project Description This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center, the structure was a purpose built cabin from the turn of the century. The structure is professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and requires only minor maintenance and upkeep annually. Projects: Front entry steps and railing, New thick cut shat roof Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $97,167 Construction\Professional Services $7,903 $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 Expense Total $7,903 $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $4,000 $1,000 $500 $546 $1,361 $500 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $3,903 $79,000 $388 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $5,969 Funding Source Total $7,903 $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 Packet Pg. 301 Project Description N L a �a L O (,i 3 a a u_ U The 110 year old original Carnegie Library building is home to the Edmonds Museum. The building is on the State of Washington Historic registry and has been well maintained over the last several years. Buildings of this age require specialized maintenance and coordination with the state historic architect to maintain the historic status. Structural stabilization and weatherproofing are the most significant priorities to maintain this facility. Projects: Minor structural reinforcement , Entry facade masonry repair, Lower entry restoration, Heating boiler replacement Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $65,029 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $12,121 $13,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $12,121 $13,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $12,121 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,000 $2,500 $10,589 $12,500 $7,500 $2,621 $7,699 $12,121 $13,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 Packet Pg. 302 (,i 3 a a u_ U a U Project Description The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the Second floor Plaza room rental space. The library is a 19,000 square foot building built in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library programming and community services. This is one of the City's most heavily used buildings by the public and has significant deferred maintenance needs, including the building fagade and plaza deck waterproofing. Projects: Window replacement, ADA access device upgrades or replacement, Gender inclusive public restroom creation, Plaza room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza room A/V installation, Building masonry restoration or building cladding, Exterior stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan replacement, Building breezeway remodel, Building flooring replacement, Garage level drainage and stucco repairs, Exterior planter box replacement and waterproofing, Staff restroom remodel Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $399,441 Construction\Professional Services $45,000 $105,175 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 Expense Total $45,000 $105,175 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $5,000 $7,500 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $40,000 $100,175 $143,402 $48,325 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $40,038 $30,000 Funding Source Total $45,000 $105,175 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 $ Packet Pg. 303 100 Project Description This 4000 square foot facility was built in 1965 as a community theater facility and later was transformed into the Meadowdale community club house. The building is currently owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses the City operated Meadowdale pre-school and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental facility. This facility while dated has been well maintained and only requires minor maintenance and repairs. Projects: Minor maintenance and repairs, Furnace replacement, Increased mechanical ventilation Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost Construction\Professional Services $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 Expense Total $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $2,500 $1,159 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $21,083 $9,926 $2,865 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $4,485 $1,946 Funding Source Total $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1.1 �n Packet Pg. 304 101 7 Project Description This facility was built in 1965 to house the City's Public Works Department, the building was converted in 1995 to tenant space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the Waste Water Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements dictate. Building is primarily used as storage and will need some updates to maintain current operational readiness. Projects: HVAC updates, Role -up door replacement, Parking lot resurfacing Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $262,205 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 $2,500 $5,000 $2,000 $53,135 $102,743 $22,308 $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $23,000 $23,000 $22,519 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 102 Packet Pg. 305 Project Description This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility now houses all City Facility Operations staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks engine repair shop and Parks and Facilities maintenance supply storage as well as Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersized to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility. Projects: Maintenance and Repair to maintain operational capacity Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $270,495 Construction\Professional Services $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 Expense Total $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) $5,000 $2,500 $5,000 $1,500 $1,500 $5,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $125,631 $13,289 $35,320 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $7,849 $3,677 $64,228 Funding Source Total $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 Packet Pg. 306 103 owl *�. Project Description The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal Court and the City Council Chambers. The building was built in 1999 encompassing 30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The building houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator facilities and evidence processing and storage. The building has had minimal system updates over it's life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance and should be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers. Projects: Boiler replacement, Air Handler and Outdoor ventilation unit replacements, Chiller plant replacement study/scope, Auxiliary heating coil replacement, New solar plant installation, Parking lot reconfiguration to meet current usage, Fire Sprinkler Installation, Interior hallway renovation and painting, Sleeping room remodel and gender specific/neutral accommodations, Gender inclusive public restrooms, Operable windows is specific locations, Roof replacement, Courts flat roof, Sally Port garage/processing remodel Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $1, 558,144 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 $285,000 $15,000 $20,000 $55,180 $35,967 $425,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $15,000 $15,000 $20,000 $40,169 $136,481 $495,071 $55,169 $151,481 $5 Packet Pg. 307 Funding Source Total $340,180 $50,967 $445,276 104 Project Description This building built in 1995 houses four Public Works divisions and the auxiliary City Emergency Operations Center This building is 28,000 square feed and is capable of operations 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The building has significant deferred maintenance needs and infrastructure updates. Projects: Vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit replacements, Ventilation fan replacements, Fire Alarm system replacement, Lobby remodel, Restroom remodel with gender inclusivity considerations, Electric Vehicle Charging and maintenance infrastructure, Emergency Communications updates, Wireless network expansion, Interior hallway flooring, Utility Bay HVAC replacement, Water main replacement (building connection), Window replacement Offices and Conference rooms, Achieve storage room remodel Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $628,697 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $5,000 $8,500 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $75,000 $118,070 $208,643 $75,315 $74,348 $38,821 $80,000 $126,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 0 A iY L O P 105 Packet Pg. 308 Project Descriptio This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and was deeded to City ownership at a later date. The facility is 6,300 quare feet in size and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City meetings. The City's maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot, roofing and grounds. Projects: Parking lot repair and recoating, Gutter/down spout replacement, Minor repair and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $320,86u Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $2,000 $2,000 $5,000 $19,697 $16,600 $94,077 $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $5,000 $5,000 $2,000 $38,880 $110,734 $19,872 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 106 Packet Pg. 309 r , ` L � F^� J Project Description L A a U This recreational facility houses the City's aquatic programing and some Parks and Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the pool house historically was only operated seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is currently expanding to year round lap and team aquatic activities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility requires minimal maintenance to remain operational and is subject to tenant lease terms of use. Projects: Security updates, Roof replacement, Gutter replacement, Plumbing fixture updates, Operational repair and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $174, 623 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $25,000 $65,570 $26,128 $25,000 $65,570 $26,128 $2,500 $5,000 $2,500 $22,500 $60,570 $23,628 $25,000 $65,570 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $2,000 $2,500 $2,500 $6,409 $16,627 $27,889 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 107 Packet Pg. 310 8.4.a WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT u Packet Pg. 311 8.4.a WWTP Proiects # CFP PROJECT DP # 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL (2022.2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Project Cost PWP-01 WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-house Projects $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $14,000,000 $19,000,000 PWP-02 Carbon Recovery Project 67 $1,162,671 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,162,671 $0 $1,162,671 PWP-03 City Park Odor Scrubber 68 $297,121 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $297,121 $0 $297,121 PWP-04 I I Nutrient Removal Project 1 $0 $1,000,0001 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Projects $1,459,792 $2,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $12,459,792 $14,000,000 $26,459,792 Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2047 TOTAL (2022-2027) TOTAL (2028-42) TOTAL Edmonds (Sewer Fund 423) (50.79%) $741,428 $1,015,800 $3,047,400 $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $6,328,328 $7,110,600 $13,438,928 Mountlake Terrace (23.17%) $338,234 $463,400 $1,390,200 $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $2,886,934 $3,243,800 $6.130,734 Olympic View Water Sewer District (16.55%) $241,596 $331,000 $993,000 $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $2,062,096 $2,317,000 $4,379,096 Ronald Sewer District (9.49%) $138,5341 $189,8001 $569,4001 $94,9001 $94,9001 $94,9001 $1,182,4341 $1,328,6001 $2,511,034 Total Revenue $1,459,792 $2,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $12,459,792 $14,000,000 $26,459,792 Packet Pg. 312 109 Project Description This ongoing project is to ensure that critical infrastructure is maintained and replaced as needed. Project expenditures may include, but are not limited to, variable frequency drives, pumps, motors, gear boxes, conveyors or any WWTP equipment that needs replacement versus repair. Project Benefit This project ensure that the critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is replaced in order to reduce risk to the City. Estimated Project Cost $19,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District Ronald Sewer District Funding Source Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $2,800,OC $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 $11,200,OC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $14,000,00 i $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $507,900 $7,110,6C $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $231,700 $3,243,8C $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $165,500 $2,317,OC $94,900 $94,900 $94,900 $94,900 $94,900 $1,328,6C $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $14,000,00 110 Packet Pg. 313 High Efficiency Blowers Project saves: $33,9091yr, and 345 tons CO2, equivalent to: 36.6 home's energy I 799 barrels of use For one year oil com med Dewaterin Project saves: $133,211iyr. and 537 tons C 0 r, equivalent to: 56.7 riome s e, ergy 1.243 barrels oFoil u�afor one year I c,pn3mmd Aeration & Blower Projects ayes, $3d,00yr. and 294 tons M, equivalent to: 87.3 home's energy 611 barrels of use for oneyear I ail cDn5umed Project Description The Carbon Recovery Project replaces the aging Sanitary Sewage Sludge Incinerator with the Ecoremedy Gasification Process. The multi -year project which was approved by City Council on July 7, 2020 is being delivered through the State of Washington Energy Savings Performance Contracting program. Project Benefit Project benefits include a more sustainable approach to treating and disposing of biosolids by creating a marketable biochar. The project will reduce overall energy requirements while producing a PFAS free (or greatly reduced) end product. The project also includes a more robust odor scrubber and screenings management enhancements which are designed to reduce operation and maintenance cost for our ratepayers while improving odor in our surrounding community. The Carbon Recovery Project is the final project that was envisioned within the Pathway to Sustainability Estimated Project Cost $26,121,039 Design Right of Way Construction $1,162,671 Expense Total $1,162,671 Sewer Fund 423 $590,521 Mountlake Terrace $269,391 Olympic View Water Sewer District $192,422 Ronald Sewer District $110,337 Funding Source Total $1,162,671 111 Packet Pg. 314 Project Descriptio This project will remove and treat the hydrogen sulfide gas that is being released into the atmosphere from a City owned sewer mainline and private roof vents in the area of Pine St and 2nd/3rd Ave S. The gas has a rotten egg smell which results in numerous complaints from residents in the area. An activated carbon odor scrubber was identified as the most efficient and effective method of capturing and destroying the nuisance odor. Project Benefit This project would formally address the ongoing problem and reduce odors in the area for residents and park patrons. Estimated Project Cost $297,121 Design Right of Way Construction $297,121 Expense Total $297,121 Sewer Fund 423 $150,908 Mountlake Terrace $68,843 Olympic View Water Sewer District $49,174 Ronald Sewer District $28,197 Funding Source Total $297,122 112 Packet Pg. 315 Project Description The State of Washington Department of Ecology will soon issue the General Permit for Nutrient Reduction. This General Permit will be issued to all WWTP's who discharge into the Puget Sound and currently caps the WWTP nutrient load. With the anticipation of the General Permit, the City has participated in a full scale pilot program that began in August 2020. The pilot program has shown promise to meet the requirements of the General Permit. This project is a place holder to fully develop a design and ultimately determine the cost of construction and ongoing O&M expenses. Project Benefit This project will ensure a reduction in nutrients discharged by the WWTP into the Puget Sound while increasing settleability and reducing effluent solids. Completion of the project will allow the City to meet the requirements within the General Permit, accompanying NPDES Permit and to increase flows in order to maximum the rated capacity of the WWTP. Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 Design $1,000,000 Right of Way Construction $5,000,000 Expense Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 Sewer Fund 423 $507,900 $2,539,500 Mountlake Terrace $231,700 $1,158,500 Olympic View Water Sewer District $165,500 $827,500 Ronald Sewer District $94,900 $474,500 Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 Packet Pg. 316 113 8.4.a CIP- CFP c R COMPARISON 3 V 7 (2021-2022) a a u_ U d U c 0 .N a� o: Y L 0 i a a LL U a_ U ti N O N N N O N R C LL C d L V fC r r Q Packet Pg. 317 114 UP / CIP COMPARISON (2021 TO 2022) 8.4.a ADDED PROJECTS Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 2 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 3 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 4 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway -Stage 5 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 6 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 7 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 8 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Transp Hwy 99 Revitalization and Gateway - Stage 9 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project divided in different Stages Parks ADA Playground Upgrade Program Annual Program to upgrade / replace plagrounds Parks Yost Pool Repair Replacement of failing plaster at the pool Water Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program (2028) Estimated future costs for waterline replacements. Water Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Reservoir assessment to determine upgrade needs and preliminary design Water 2022 Waterline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements. Storm Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2028) Estimated future costs for storm pipe replacements. Storm Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Phase 1 Estimated future costs for 1st phase of Creek Restoration Storm 2022 SD Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to storm replacements Storm Green Street & Rain Gardens Estimated future costs for Citywide green infrastructure projects Sewer Phase 15 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements (2028) Estimated future costs for sewer line replacements/rehab/impr. Sewer 2022 SS Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewer line replacements. Sewer Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 4 Estimated future costs for sewer project. N Y L cc a C Y L O 3 a a U- U d U c O .y d Y O 3 a a U- U I a_ U ti I N O N N N O N R LL a+ C d E L V R r r Q Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 318 115 8.4.a UP / CIP COMPARISON (2021 TO 2022) REMOVED PROJECTS Type PROJECT NAME UP DESCRIPTION Transp Hwy 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Removed / Included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project - Stage 4 Transp Hwy 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Removed/ included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project - Stage 9 Transp Hwy 99 @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Removed / included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project - Stage 5 Transp Hwy 99 Pedestrian Improvements (SR-104 Off -Ramps) X Removed / included in Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project Stage 2 & 3 Transp Hwy 99 @ 234th St. SW Traffic Signal X lRemoved Transp Sunset Ave. Sidewalk X Removed Transp Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd Ave. S to 4th Ave. S X Completed Transp Dayton St. Walkway from 7th Ave.S to 8th Ave. S X Completed Parks Greenhouse Replacement 2021 Project Water 2021 Waterline Overlays Completed Water Dayton 3rd to 9th Completed Water 5 Corners Reservoir RecoatinR Completed Water Phase 11 Annual Replacement Program (2021) Completed Storm Dayton 3rd to 9th Completed Storm Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements -Dayton Pump Station Completed Storm 2021 SD Overlays Completed Storm Phase 1 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2020) Completed Sewer Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 2 Completed Sewer Phase 7 SS Replacement Project (2020) Completed Sewer Phase 8 SS Replacement Project (2021) Completed Sewer Dayton 3rd to 9th Completed Sewer 2021 SS Overlays Completed Sewer LS#1 Metering and Flow Study Completed Y L cc a C Y L O 3 a a U- U d U C O .y d Y L O 3 a a U- U I a_ U ti I N 0 N N N O N R LL a+ C d E L V R r r Q Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 319 116 8.4.a UP / CIP COMPARISON (2021 TO 2022) CHANGED PROJECTS Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Transp SR-104 Adaptive System X Moved up from 2023 to 2022 Transp 175th Slope Repair Moved from Fund 126 to Fund 112 Transp Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave.S to 9th Ave. S X Construction funding added in 2022 Parks 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Postponed until 2025 Parks Waterfront Walkway Completion Moved to fund 125 Parks Civic Park X Utilizing $2M from REET and not General Fund Parks Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Increase in funding 2023-2027 Y L cc a C Y L O 3 a a a U d U c O .y d N Y L O 2 a a a U I a_ U ti I N O N N N O N R LL a+ C d E L V R r r Q Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 320 117 EDMONDSPARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES 2022-2027 PROPOSED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 17. � �- �� e �c�`�� ~i{�.`�•.��,s.^ �-•`ram •:. .i '��}�`t'•%�+` y _ 8.4.b EDMONDSPARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES October 13, 2021 Members of the City Council, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds, It is an honor to present the 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP serves as a long- range planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources, both secured and unsecured. The CIP is updated each year and presented in conjunction with the budget. Capital Improvement projects that are also included in the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) which are identified in the following document. In 2022 the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department will focus on the completion of the largest ever City of Edmonds Parks Capital project, the redevelopment of the 8-acre Civic Center Playfields. There are significant resources of staff time and funding invested in this project which began construction in August 2021 and is schedule to be complete Winter 2022. In addition to Civic Center the department will continue to focus on deferred maintenance of existing parks and recreation facilities, playground renovations and upgrades and required maintenance at Yost Pool. The updated Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (PROS) will be completed in early 2022. This document, based largely on citizens priorities will guide future CIP plans. At this time, near future projects include the re -development of Marina Beach Park ($1M in grant funding secured), and annually funds are being set aside and accumulating for potential parkland and open space acquisition should the right opportunity become available. The department is focused on providing an equitable distribution of access to park and recreational facilities throughout the entire City. Your Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department is proud to have served the citizens throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, working to ensure residents and visitors had safe and enjoyable places to recreate. With unprecedented usage of the city's parks system our priorities shifted to enhanced litter, garbage and restroom sanitization however we are looking forward to returning to our list of deferred maintenance and keeping the Edmonds Parks safe and enjoyable for all. Sincerely, ,Ril� Angie Feser Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director 425-771-0256 Angie.Feser@EdmondsWA.gov Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services • 600 Main Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 322 8.4.b 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CFP # PROJECT 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 6-Year Toll PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS Civic Center Playfield Redevelopment of 8-acre park consistent with Master Plan adopted in 2017; X PRK 1 add restrooms, walking track, landscaping, inclusive playground, improve $ 9,755,742 $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,755,7 field and lighting, skate park, petanque grove, tennis and multi sports courts. Marina Beach Park Improvements Redevelop the park consistent with the Master Plan adopted in 2015; X PRK 2 Parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn areas, permanent restrooms, $ $ $ 1,750,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,750,000 $ $ 6,000,0 upgrade play area, improve ADA Accessibility, add bridges over new alignment of Willow Creek. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Prioritized in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and State certified Creative PRK 3 District. Improvements encourage pedestrian traffic and provide visual $ $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 8,000,0 connection between ECA and downtown contributing to economic vitality. Playground Upgrade Program Annual upgrades of playground equipment and fall surfacing to provide PRK 4 additional inclusive playgrounds/facilities providing access for children of all $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,050,0 ages and abilities. Yost Pool Repair Regular maintenance to re -plaster the pool to replace and repair failing PRK 5 plaster. Pool will be forced to close without repair. $ 175,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 175,0 Waterfront Walkway Completion Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina PRK 6 Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums, $ $ $ 500,000 $ 750,000 $ $ $ 1,250,0 to provide ADA improvements. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) X PRK 7 Restoration of the Marsh to reconnect the Puget Sound within the Edmonds $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Marsh and two fresh water creeks to provide fresh water / salt water estuary and natural tidal exchange. N Y L ca a c M rn Y L O U a a LL U a c� a u_ V I IL N L M a m N O M O L a ti N 0 N N N O N r C d E t v R Q Page 2 Packet Pg. 323 8.4.b 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CFP # PROJECT 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 6-Year Toll Community Park & Athletic Complex - Phase II X PRK 8 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park $ $ $ $ $ $ $ and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and - - - - - - construction of two additional fields. Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building X PRK 9 Replace and/or renovate deteriorating building in City Park. Project in $ $ $ $ $ $ $ conceptualphase. (A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS $ 10,107,764 $ 177,023 $ 2,427,024 $ 3,427,025 $ 3,927,026 $ 6,177,027 $ 26,230,7 PARKS CIP PROGRAMS Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program PRK A This ongoing program allocates funds for the regular maintenance, repair and $ 155,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,405,0 replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. Beautification Program This ongoing program allocates funds to support beautification. Specifically PRK B flower plantings, irrigation and mulch in areas such as corner parks, landscape $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 126,0 beds, streetscapes and gateways as well as flower baskets. Park and Open Space Acquisition Program PRK C To acquire land for future parks and open spaces as opportunities become $ 1,099,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 399,000 $ 3,094,0 available. Debt Service and Interfund Transfers PRK D Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to $ 193,832 $ 123,000 $ 148,000 $ 173,000 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 $ 1,033,8 Engineering for Capital Project Support. (B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 1,468,832 $ 993,000 $ 1,018,000 $ 1,043,000 $ 1,068,000 $ 1,068,000 $ 6,658,8, (C) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B) 1 $ 11,576,596 1 $ 1,170,023 1 $ 3,445,024 1 $ 4,470,025 1 $ 4,995,026 1 $ 7,245,027 $ 32,889,5 N Y R a c R y Y O U a a LL U a c� a LL U I V N M a m N O M O L a r• N O N N N O N r c d E t U fC Q Page 3 Packet Pg. 324 8.4.b 2022 - 2027 SIX -YEAR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS CIP REVENUE 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 6-Year Tot Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,900,0 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) 11 - Fund 125 $ 3,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 11,000,0 Park Impact Fee's - Fund 332-100 $ 874,575 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 3,124,5 Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 1,194,0 Operating Contribution - General Fund $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ $ Investment Interest (3%) $ 78,110 $ 39,793 $ 50,797 $ 31,381 $ 25,632 $ (539) $ 225,1 Donations $ 142,000 $ $ $ - $ - $ $ 142,0 Bond Proceeds $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ Secured Grants $ 2,728,000 $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ - $ $ 3,728,0 Unsecured Grants $ - $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 8,600,0 (D) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE $ 8,421,685 $ 2,388,793 $ 2,399,797 $ 4,380,381 $ 3,974,632 $ 8,348,461 $ 29,913,7. Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 (E) Beginning Fund Balance (332 + 332-100) $ 4,554,645 $ 1,399,734 $ 2,618,504 $ 1,573,276 $ 1,483,632 $ 463,238 (D) Revenue $ 8,421,685 $ 2,388,793 $ 2,399,797 $ 4,380,381 $ 3,974,632 $ 8,348,461 (C) Expenditures $ 11,576,596 $ 1,170,023 $ 3,445,024 $ 4,470,025 $ 4,995,026 $ 7,245,027 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) 1 $ 1,39%734 1 $ 2,61%504 1 $ 1,5731276 1 $ 11483,632 1 $ 463,238 1 $ 1,566,672 N Y L ca a c M N Y L 0 U B a a u_ U a V a u_ U I a L M a m 0 M 0 L a r, N O N N N O N C d E L V ft3 a Page 4 Packet Pg. 325 of EI)4 Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services PARKS PROJECTS ,-- 1��. 1890 Projects nor o Parks �1 � „ o IL �I IL U- P W �RK,03P p P`RK-Q6 y7� �� U ,�� •� ' Ch�� 1�■�� NMI � mm_ PRK-05 a Fif P `K-02 m � = . a PRK+09 _ o � V �111111 �•�Cl1111 � � N N N r N E N �� a PRK-0� -1 --- II ■ � � III L4 r/I�Y * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. Packet Pg. 326 Page 5 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 1: Civic Center Playfield bib f, 310 61h Ave. N — Downtown Edmonds Project Summary: An 8-acre downtown park development supported by $3.47M in grant funding, $5.3M in bonds, $1.3M in Park Impact Fees and $3.4M in Real Estate Excise Tax. This signature project broke ground in August 2021 and is slated for completion Winter 2022. Project Justification: This is a multi -year design, fund development and construction project that is a very high priority in the 2016 PROS plan. The Master Plan process was robust with extensive community input. Construction began August 9, 2021 and is underway and 2022 funding necessary to complete the project. Estimated Construction Cost: $13,758,000 2022 2023 0- Planning & Design Construction $9,755,742 $9,755,742 Total Expenses $9,755,742 $9,755,742 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $2,898,672 $2,898,672 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 $1,352,620 $1,352,620 Bond Proceeds $1,634,450 $1,634,450 Federal Grant (LWCF) $500,000 $500,000 RCO State Grants $850,000 $850,000 Snohomish County Grants $450,000 $450,000 Verdant Grant $170,000 $170,000 Hazel Miller Foundation Grant $1,500,000 $1,500,000 State Appropriation / DOC Grant $258,000 $258,000 Park Donations $142,000 $142,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $9,755,742 $0 $9,755,742 $0 Project Accounting #C536 & C551 Page 6 Packet Pg. 327 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 2: Marina Beach Park Improvements 470 Admiral Way, South of the Port of Edmonds Project Summary: Park renovation to better serve the community as it accommodates the new alignment of Willow Creek. The project will include parking lot reconfiguration, overlooks, lawn areas, potential concession areas, permanent restrooms, upgraded play area, upgraded benches, picnic tables and BBQ's, improved ADA accessibility, a loop trail system including two pedestrian bridges connecting the park across Willow Creek, personal watercraft staging and launching area, bicycle racks, fencing, retaining the existing beach/ driftwood area and off leash dog area and environmental education opportunities. The Marina Beach Master Plan includes daylighting Willow Creek which requires removal of a 1,600' pipe that was placed in the early 1960's and is the only exchange between the Puget Sound and the freshwater Edmonds Marsh Estuary. $1,000,000 in RCO grants were awarded for this project in 2021. Project Justification: Marina Beach Park is a highly used regional park. Through the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Action Plan and the 2016 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan the community identified the need to restore the adjacent Edmonds Marsh, and re-established for salmon habitat. Improvements are intended to retain this site as an asset to the regional waterfront park system. This project is intended to address sea level rise and will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. Estimated Cost: $6,000,000 Planning & Design 2022 2023 2024 2025 $600,000 2026 $600,000 Construction $1,150,000 $1,500,000 $2,750,000 $5,400,000 Total Expenses $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $2,750,000 $6,000,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $750,000 $1,000,000 $1,750,000 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,150,000 $2,650,000 Secured Grants $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $2,150,000 $600,000 $5,400,000 $600,000 Project Accounting # C550 Page 7 Packet Pg. 328 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 3: 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor 41h Avenue from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the Arts, Downtown Project Summary: Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary design development through 2020-21. Funding for this project has not been secured at this time. Project Justification: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and contribute to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District. Estimated Cost: $8,000,000 Planning & Design 2022 2023 2024 2025 $800,000 $800,000 Construction $200,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,200,000 Total Expenses $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 Operating contribution — general fund Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $0 $1,000,000 1 $0 $1,000,000 1 $0 $6,000,000 1 $0 $8,000,000 Project Accounting #C538 N Y L a. M N Y L 0 V a u_ U d U d u_ U i a U (L m 0 Q. 0 L ti N 0 N N N O N r.: c a) E 0 Q Page 8 Packet Pg. 329 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 4: Playground Upgrade Program Project Summary: City of Edmonds owns, operates and maintains 15 playgrounds and only two of them are considered fully inclusive and accessible (Seaview and Civic Parks). One of the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department initiatives is to continually update playgrounds which range in installation dates from 1985 - 2019. As part of these scheduled updates the department will work to enhance playgrounds to be inclusive versus merely meeting ADA standards. In many cases this includes enhanced play surfacing and play equipment that provide for children of all abilities. The playground improvement prioritization is slated to be established at the conclusion and adoption of the 2022 PROS plan to determine an implementation strategy. Project Justification: Playground upgrades are a necessary part of maintaining a safe play environment. With playgrounds that are 35+ years old many will be scheduled for upgrades. Further, it is the goal of the City to ensure that those upgrades include considerations for children of all physical and mental abilities and that these play amenities are designed to be a welcoming and healthy experience for all. Estimated Cost: $175,000 per year / $1,050,000 (6-year total) Planning & Design Construction $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 Total Expenses $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $175,000 $175,000 $0 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $1,050,000 $0 L CL N Y L 0 V CL a u_ U d U d u_ U I CL U Y (L 0 U) 0 a 0 L N O N N N O N r c a� E M 0 a Page 9 Packet Pg. 330 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 5: Yost Pool Repair 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for many residents. In addition to teaching our youth water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity for community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. At this time, the pool needs a significant capital repair as the plaster lining the inside of the pool is continuing to deteriorate, falling off the walls and detaching from the bottom of the pool. The pool was re -plastered in 2001, 2011 and it is past due to re -plaster it again. Project Justification: Typically, the plaster on the pool bubbles when it reaches its end of life, eventually breaking open creating sharp edges which present a danger to the pool users and leads to future damage to existing plaster. If the plaster repair is not completed, the pool will not be operational at a point in the near future. Estimated Cost: $175,000 2022 20231 Planning & Design 125 2026 2027 Construction $175,000 $175,000 Total Expenses $175,000 $175,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $175,000 $175,000 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fee's Secured Grants Total Revenue $175,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $175,000 1 L a. M N Y L 0 V a. u_ U d U a U a i U L (L m rn 0 sa. 0 L a ti N O N N N O N r C a) E t v ns Q Page 10 Packet Pg. 331 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 6: Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section Beachfront in front of Ebb Tide Condominiums (200 Beach Place) Project Summary: This would connect the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina Beach Park ensuring all individuals, including those with mobility challenges and those pushing strollers can safely enjoy the waterfront. The final missing piece would be constructed in front of the Ebb Tide condominiums in the easement owned by the City of Edmonds. The easement and walkway design are currently under legal review. Project Justification: To provide public access along the waterfront for all individuals. Completion of the walkway would meet ADA requirements and would support efforts to keep dogs off of the beaches. A top priority in the 2016 PROS plan is to open up beachfront access. Estimated Cost: $1,250,000 i Planning & Design $125,000 1 $125,000 Construction $375,000 1 $750,000 $1,125,000 Total Expenses $500,000 $750,000 $1,125,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $500,000 $750,000 $1,125,000 Park Impact Fee's - Fund 332-100 Operating contribution — general fund Secured Grants Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $500,000 so $750,000 $0 $1,125,000 $0 Y R a. C R N L 0 V a. u_ U d U d u_ U I d U N IL m 0 om 0 L ti N O N N N O N r c a) E 0 a Page 11 Packet Pg. 332 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 7: Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh and property owned by Unocal (Chevron Services Co.) Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh restoring the natural tidal exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including daylighting of Willow Creek within the park. That project is identified and detailed a separate capital improvement project (PRK 2). Project Justification: This project will fulfill the 2016 PROS plan goals and support Governor's Inslee's capital budget for salmon recovery, culvert removal, water quality and water supply projects to expand and improve salmon habitat. The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow Chinook salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. In addition, it will promote recreational tourism at both Marina Beach and the Marsh for all generations to enjoy, learn about, and utilize as a wildlife sanctuary in an urban environment. The project has a stormwater component which will require removal of tidal gates and a 1,600 pipe that was placed in the early 1960's as a connection between the Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. Estimated Cost: TBD Page 12 Packet Pg. 333 8.4.b Land Acquisition Planning & Design Construction Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fee's Bond Proceeds Secured Grants Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition Park Donations Operating Contribution — General Fund Stormwater — Fund 422 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding Project Accounting #M070 N L d c 0 N Y L 0 v d IL u_ U d U d u_ U I d U N L IL m 0 Om 0 L ti N O N N N O N r a N E L V Q Page 13 Packet Pg. 334 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 8: Community Park & Athletic Complex Phase II (CFP Only) 23200 100`h Ave. W — Former Woodway High School Project Summary: Two projects - Phase I lighting, Phase II renovation of existing underdeveloped athletic field Project Justification: By adding lighting to the newly renovated Phase I year-round field, usage of the multi -use facility would significantly increase. Phase II would renovate a currently poorly maintained and underutilized large athletic field to provide community significantly more multi -sport use of an existing facility. This Athletic Complex serves a densely populated area of more than 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance costs offset by user fees. Phase I was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phase II estimated at $6-8M. Estimated Cost: $6-8M 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total TotalConstruction ------- Real Estate Excise Tax 11 - '125TotalBond ------- Proceeds ------- Unsecured Funding $6-8 M Page 14 Packet Pg. 335 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK 9: Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building (CFP Only) 600 3rd Avenue South — City Park Project Summary: The 40+ year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and needs major renovation or replacement and is currently too small to accommodate staff and needed work areas. Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. Estimated Cost: $3 — 4M 2022 20231 125 2026 2027 Planning & Design Construction Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees— Fund 332-100 Bond Proceeds Operating Contribution — General Fund Park Donations Total Revenue Unsecured Funding I L"I IL u_ U I a U L IL m 0 a 0 L IL N O N N N O N r c a� E t v R r a Page 15 Packet Pg. 336 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK A: Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Project Summary: The City of Edmonds owns, operates, and maintains 47 parks and open spaces consisting of more than 230 acres and including a mile of Puget Sound beach and shoreline. Funding allocation for major maintenance, replacements and small capital projects for the city-wide parks and recreation amenities including paved and soft -surface trails, bridges, playgrounds, sports courts, athletic fields, skate park, Yost pool, restrooms, pavilion, picnic shelters, fishing pier, lawn areas, parking lots, fencing, lighting, flower poles, monument and interpretative signage and related infrastructure. Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs, increased city liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. The 2016 PROS Plan Goal #7 is to provide a high quality and efficient level of maintenance for all parks and related public assets in Edmonds. Estimated Cost: $2,405,000 (6-year total) Repair & Maintenance $105,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 i $400,000 $400,000 $2,105,000 Professional Services $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Total Expenses $155,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,405,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $155000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,405,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $155,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,405,000 $0 Page 16 Packet Pg. 337 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK B: Beautification Program Project Summary: Beautification to include flower plantings, irrigation and mulch in multiple areas throughout town for example: outdoor plazas, corner parks, the library, Frances Anderson Center, streetscapes, gateways and hanging flower baskets. Project Justification: Improve beautification and provide comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees. This program is highly supported by volunteers in the community. Baskets and corner parks are sponsored resulting in about $19,000 of contributions a year in additional funding. Estimated Cost: $21,000 per year / $126,000 (6-year total) Page 17 Packet Pg. 338 8.4.b Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services PRK C: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program Project Summary: Acquisition of land when feasible that will benefit citizens and support the priorities identified in the PROS plan. $700,000 is currently reserved for park land and open space acquisition. These funds were accumulated in 2019, 2020 and 2021. There is no request to purchase a specific property at this time. Project Justification: There are large areas of Edmonds where the Parks, open space and recreation facilities level of service is below adopted standards; particularly on the Hwy 99 corridor. This is a priority in the PROS plan. Estimated Cost: TBD, funds accumulated in preparation for land acquisition opportunities total $3,094,000 over 6 years. Land — Park Facilities Total Expenses Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $900,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,900,000 Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $199,000 $1,194,000 Total Revenue $1,099,000 $399,000 $399,000 $399,000 $399,000 $399,000 Unsecured Funding —A IN= $3,094,000 L CL N Y L 0 V CL IL u_ U d U IL u_ U I d U N Y L IL m 0 a 0 L IL N O N N N O N r c a� E t R r a Page 18 Packet Pg. 339 8.4.b CIP/CFP COMPARISON 2021-2022 Fund Project Name CFP Description New Projects Added 125 Playground Upgrade Program Annual upgrades of playground equipment and fall surfacing to provide additional inclusive playgrounds / facilities providing access for children of all ages and abilities. 125 Yost Pool Repair Regular Maintenance to re -plaster the pool to replace and repair the failing plaster. Pool will be forced to close without repair. Projects Removed 125 Greenhouse Replacement 2021 Project Projects Changed 125 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Postponed until 2025 125 Waterfront Walkway Completion Moved to fund 125 125 Civic Center Playfield X Utilizing $2M from REET and not the General Fund 125 Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Increase in funding 2023-2027 N Y L a C O to Y L O L) a a ILL U a c� a ILL U I a L M a m O a O L a r` N O N N N O N C d E L V M ++ a Page 19 Packet Pg. 340