Loading...
REVIEWED BLD2021-1362+Geotechnical_Report+2.10.2022_2.08.14_PM+2674295REVIEWED Earth Solutions NW«C BY CITY OF EDMONDS s 15365 NE 90" Street, Suite 100 Redmond, WA 98052 Main (425) 449-4704 1 Fax (425) 449-4711 www.esnw.com REVISION Feb 10 2022 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT FIELD REPORT Project No. 8394 Page 1 of 2 ReportID 8394.00 G 01172022 Date Mon 1/17/2022 Weather Overcast, 46°F Arrival/Departure Time(s) 2:00 1 2:45 Travel Time (hr) 1.0 Project Name Tollefson ADU Location 633 Walnut Street, Edmonds ESNW Rep. & Phone Henry Wright 1 206-793-4193 Client Info/Contact L. Tollefson 1 425-773-9302 General Contractor Info/Contact Leif Helleren Construction, Inc. 425-770-1970 Contractor #2 1 nfo/Contact Permit No(s). Reviewed By LAC HTW Field Supervisor Initials/Date Project Manager Initials/Date Limitations: The presence of ourfield representative at the site is to provide our clientwith a source of professional advice, opinions, and recommendations based upon the field representative's observations and testing of the contractor's work. Our services do not include supervision or direction of the contractor, their employees, or agents. Geotechnical recommendations for obtaining project objectives may be made by our representatives; however, direction of the actual work should come from the owner or contractor, as appropriate. The contractor is responsible for complying with the contract documents at all times, regardless of the presence of our field representative. Jobsite safety, including compliance with all applicable state or federal regulations, is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The observations, recommendations, and conclusions provided in this field report are preliminary until reviewed by the ESNW project manager. ESNW rep. was on site to observe a test pit excavation within the proposed ADU building pad. ESNW rep. observed dark brown, loose, wet, organic -rich material exposed along the proposed ADU building pad subgrade. ESNW rep. observed the contractor excavate a test pit approximately 10.5 feet deep below the current building pad subgrade. The upper 4.5 feet was observed to consist of loose, wet, topsoil/peat material which may have been old fill or reworked native material; an approximate 6-inch layer of washed rock was observed at about 4 feet deep and heavy seepage was emerging from the rock. Native dark brown peat was observed from about 4.5 feet to about 10 feet deep. The native peat was underlain by loose to medium dense, wet gray silty sand. Moderate caving was observed throughout the depth of the test pit. The peat material is not suitable for support of the proposed structure. The peat should be removed and replaced with suitable structural fill, or the structure should be supported on pipe piles. Removal of the material may prove to be impractical due to the depth of the peat. It is our opinion that supporting the structure on pipe piles is a suitable option. Based on the local geologic mapping (advance outwash) and the depth of the peat, we anticipate pipe piles would be driven to depths of approximately 20 to 25 feet; however, we recommend driving a test pile or advancing a test boring to better delineate anticipated depth to refusal. If the proposed structure is supported on pipe piles, assuming the pipe piles are driven to refusal, the allowable axial load capacities listed below can be used for design: Pile Diameter Load Capacity* Refusal Criteria seconds/inch Hydraulic Hammer 2-inch 6 kips 8 400 lbs. 3-inch 12 kips 10 850 lbs. 4-inch 20 kips 16 850 lbs. * Assumes a factor -of -safety of at least 2.0 Report ID 8394.00 G 01172022 Page 2 of 2 With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of approximately three quarters of an inch. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. Due to the groundwater conditions, we recommend the piles include corrosion protection. We recommend supporting the slab on grade beams if pipe piles are utilized. An ESNW representative should observe and document the pipe pile installation to confirm the refusal criteria during the pile driving operation. ESNW can provide additional testing and information upon request. IT�W TONAL V 01 /24/2022 Henry T. Wright, P.E. Associate Principal Engineer Earth Solutions NW. LLC