Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2022-09-20 City Council - Full Agenda-3268
Op E D o Agenda Edmonds City Council tnl. }nyo REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEPTEMBER 20, 2022, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. PRESENTATION 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Councilmember Laura Johnson (5 min) 5. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. Edmonds City Council Agenda September 20, 2022 Page 1 RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. Claim for Damages from Allan Gourlie, Christopher Hernandez and Anthony Saldana (0 min) 2. July 2022 Monthly Financial Report (0 min) 8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2022 2. Approval of Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2022 3. Approval of Council Committee Minutes 4. Approval of claim checks. 5. Resolution of Appreciation to Councilmember Laura Johnson 6. Opioid Settlement Allocation Agreement 7. Changes to Finance Manager Job Description 8. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas for 76th Ave and 220th St. Intersection Improvements Project. 9. Approve Vacation Accrual for Returning Employee 10. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with Landau Associates for the Civic Center Playfield Project 11. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with Herrera Environmental Consultants for the Stormwater Management Action Plan (SMAP) 12. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with HKA Global, Inc for the Carbon Recovery Project 13. Approve Resolution Declaring Utility Easements as Surplus at 23610 Highway 99 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing Permanent Design Standards for Multifamily Buildings in the BD2 Zone (30 min) 2. Public Hearing for Street Vacation PLN2022-0045 (30 min) 10. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Park Land Acquisition Report (30 min) 2. Development Code Rewrite Work Plan (30 min) 3. 2022 September Budget Amendment (10 min) 4. Award Construction Contract for the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Project (5 min) 5. Edmonds City Attorney Contract Extension (20 min) 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Edmonds City Council Agenda September 20, 2022 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Resolution of Appreciation to Councilmember Laura Johnson Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Laura Johnson was elected to Edmonds City Council in November 2019 and served as a Councilmember until September 13, 2022. Recommendation N/A Narrative Today we thank Councilmember Laura Johnson for her contributions to the City of Edmonds. Attachments: Resolution of Appreciation - LJohnson Packet Pg. 3 4.1.a RESOLUTION NO. XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL THANKING COUNCILMEMBER LAURA JOHNSON FOR HER SERVICE TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Laura Johnson was sworn into office on January 7, 2020 to serve a four-year term; she served one year as Council President Pro Tem; and WHEREAS, during her tenure, she embraced the work of the City Council with passion and compassion, and steadfast dedication to Edmonds citizens, City staff, and community leaders; and WHEREAS, during her term, Councilmember Laura Johnson approached her duties diligently — apprising herself of all the facts and ensuring that the Council as a body had all the relevant information needed to make informed decisions; and WHEREAS, she helped to see the completion of the following: Advocated for and supported a Human and Social Services program to serve Edmonds' most vulnerable residents; Supported the HASCO resolution to support affordable housing; Advocated and lobbied for the redevelopment of Highway 99; Provided significant contributions to the Development Tree Code; Developed the Council Code of Conduct; Advocated for equitable distribution of resources, focusing on neighborhoods outside the Bowl Suicide Prevention Month — 2 years; Supported the development of a community center in So. Edmonds/Lk Ballinger neighborhood; Supported ongoing access to Reproductive Healthcare; Supported and passed budgets which prioritized people and the environment; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Laura Johnson was involved with many committees and commissions on behalf of the City of Edmonds including: LEOFF Disability Board; Mayors Climate Protection Committee; Seashore Transportation Forum; Edmonds Lodging Tax Commission; Youth Commission Liaison — 2 years; Affordable Housing Alliance; Lake Ballinger Regional Workgroup; and WRIA 8 alternate; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Councilmember Laura Johnson be applauded and thanked for her service to City Council. RESOLVED this 20th day of September 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON MAYOR, MIKE NELSON 1 Packet Pg. 4 4.1.a ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. September 16, 2022 September 20, 2022 xxxx z Packet Pg. 5 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Claim for Damages from Allan Gourlie, Christopher Hernandez and Anthony Saldana Staff Lead: NA Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Allan Gourlie, Christopher Hernandez and Anthony Saldana Narrative Allan Gourlie 18709 92nd Ave W ($74,000.00) Anthony Saldana 6th Ave N ($132.60) Christopher Hernandez 131 10th Ave E (TBD) Attachments: Gourlie, Allan - Claim for Damages - for council Claim for Damages - Saldana, Anthony - for council Claim for Damages - Hernandez, Christopher - for council Packet Pg. 6 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Please take note that Allan & Julie Gourlie mailing address home phone # _, work phone # who currently resides at and who resided at Date Claim Form Received by City at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is , is claiming damages against City Of Edmonds in the sum of $ 74,000.00 arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: 5/9/2022 TIME: 1:30 pm LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 1 8 7 0 9 9 2" d A v e W E d m o d n s, W A 9 8 0 2 0 DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. We requested to remove 3 trees from our property over a year ago (emails) as they had already damaged our sprinkler system and were starting to encroach on the shed and other piping systems and the road. We were denied as they said they were on the right-of-way for the city and they didn't want to cut them down at the time. I told them then if anything else was damaged they would be responsible for ii Now those same trees damaged our main sewer line — busting through the line and completely clogging the system to the point that it overflowed into my house. The sewage flooded parts of my bathroom, living room, dining area and kitchen on the main floor. Estimates foi cleanup are $24,000. Repairs are probably $20k. The pipe needs to be replaced at cost of $14k1 and trees cut at 8K for a minimum total of $68,000 so far. I turned this into insurance but they don't pay for it all and It is not their responsibility anyhow as this would not have happened if they were cut down and killed. (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. Mike — Mikes Plumbing — 425-775-0201 — scoped with Camera and cataloged where clogged Two city Sewer system employees — Saw the sewer system clogged at trees — through scope 13 ft from rd (pictures) Servpro — Chris Verellen — 425-005-0132 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? x Yes No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: License Plate # Type Auto: _ * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * Driver License # (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: m E L O 4— E V Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page l of 2 Packet Pg. 7 7.1.a This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. 4z--, xeF;, ignature of Claimant Date and place (residential address, city and county) Or Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. E v Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 Of 2 Packet Pg. 8 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM i. Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that n�►Sc�,�. who currently resides at mailing address home phone # ; work phone # and who resided at — at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is is claiming damages against Q1� CA— in the sum of $ arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: Se ` .1 -1` o) . LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: (o'u'l L_C_ DESCRIPTION: w. � TIME: � � P Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought 4,bout the injury or damage. Also describe the inju or mage. (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes /'�No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY E V Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page I of 2 Packet Pg. 9 7.1.b This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Claimant Signature of Representative `"f- (2-- )-()a2 Date and place (residential address, city and county) Date and place (residential address, city and county) Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. a� a� E R 0 0 E U Fonn Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 10 7.1.c CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that (t s� 34�& 4t� �Xo kla , who currently resides at mailing address I' home phone # , work phone # , and who resided at . at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is Tom, is claiming damages against i hci►^ +"�'1 { in the sum of $ arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: ! zI I�6 b TIME: LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: +i,� t /0th /1Vr 3 r ,'S' {��' � wit �22 � O DESCRIPTION: �v V' h 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that bought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. t) C.a- L G C) h Os ka 'C.] r'el LJ i—f " a d t"c IMo , US a ►- _ A�' r� n -mot; �•z .epU,p'r t a ` 'T�"Ciw 1,i — I i7 C.L I—+ ' /£ r e. rj i i"L.J'7� t C V t o NCB -A "r-Zdg&u / (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) I 5I"ae 0,54e`h&may , /trn WOt�'f47 rt;a7 it J BU�" h2 >,1'{/4' S /i.r Sous Gqc 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names,_ addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: License Plate # Type Auto: _ Yes �No * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * Driver License # (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Address: Phone#: Name: Address: m a� R E M L 4- E U Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 11 7.1.c This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. ignat a of Claimant Date and place (residential address, city and county) Or Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) E .2 U Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Frr6_► I Chr;5� r. 44rv►av,,L2, Q jv,,oa_-\ cahi Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 12 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 July 2022 Monthly Financial Report Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Sarah Mager Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Receive for filing. Narrative July 2022 Monthly Financial Report Attachments: July Monthly Financial Report Packet Pg. 13 I 7.2.a I OF EDP � d lac. 1 $9v CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT JULY 2022 Packet Pg. 14 1 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail As of July 31, 2022 Years Agency/ Investment Purchase to Par Market Issuer TvPe Price Maturitv Value Value Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA Bonds Grant Cnty WA Bonds Grant Cnty WA Bonds Seattle WA Muni Bonds FHLMC Bonds FHLB Bonds First Financial - ECA CD Kent WA Bonds FHLB Bonds FM Bonds FNMA Bonds FHLB Bonds Spokane County WA Bonds First Financial - Waterfront Center CD TOTAL SECURITIES Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool TOTAL PORTFOLIO Maturity Coupon Date Rate 948,084 0.34 855,000 865,021 12/01/22 5.00% 1,517,955 0.42 1,500,000 1,490,280 01/01/23 1.54% 576,332 0.42 520,000 527,675 01/01/23 5.00% 2,224,500 0.51 2,000,000 2,036,060 02/01/23 5.00% 988,678 0.72 1,000,000 981,517 04/20/23 0.38% 1,996,590 1.18 2,000,000 1,932,910 10/05/23 0.22% 2,803,516 1.29 2,803,516 2,803,516 11/15/23 2.08% 286,648 1.34 250,000 261,250 12/01/23 5.00% 954,866 1.70 1,000,000 957,183 04/10/24 0.35% 996,082 1.88 1,000,000 997,043 06/17/24 2.80% 992,693 1.92 1,000,000 980,291 07/02/24 1.75% 950,774 2.30 1,000,000 953,340 11/18/24 0.90% 207,260 2.34 200,000 195,410 12/01/24 2.10% 1,575,000 5.26 1,575,000 1,575,000 11/01/27 0.20% 17,018,977 1.54 16,703,516 16,556,496 Seattle WA Issuer Diversification Muni, 12%� Kent WA, rhF: 1% r s t Financial- Mason & � CD, 26% Kitsap Cnty WA, 5% Gra nt Cnty_ Spokane WA, 12% FHLB, 12% . County FNMA, 6% WA, 1% FHLMC, 6% 26,018,466 26,018,466 Demand 1.63% 42,835,212 42,835,212 Demand 1.37% $ 85,557,193 $ 85,410,173 Cash and Investment Balances Bonds, (in $ Millions) $12.3, 14%— CD's, $4.4, 5% State LGIP, $26.0, 29% ■ County LGIP, $42.8 , 48% Checki ng, —$3.0,4% Q 1 Packet Pg. 15 1 I 7.2.a I INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Annual Interest Income $1,400, 000 77771 $1,236,875 $1,200, 000 $1,000,000 $882556 947 931 $950,684 $800,000 $635,781 $600,000 $508,183 4 $400,000 $200,000 $- 2017 2018 201 2020 2021 YTD 2022 2 Packet Pg. 16 I 7.2.a I GENERAL FUND SUMMARY General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months) General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenses 10,000, 000 — 9,000,000 8,000,000 �♦ 7,000, 000 6,000,000 • • 5,000,000 • •V • % 4,000, 000 • ♦ • 3 000 000 , 2,000, 000 1,000, 000 — August November February May August November February May General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 through 2021) Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 12,000, 000 10,000,000 8,000, 000 6,000,000 4,000, 000 2,000,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 General Fund Tax Revenue (2022 YTD) 7,000,000 6,00,000 6,0000,000 55,761,874 5,500, 000 54.770.936 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000, 000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,294,959 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 3 Packet Pg. 17 1 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2022 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 2,485,140 $ 2,485,140 $ 2,186,816 -12.00% February 4,914,775 2,429,635 4,606,889 -6.26% March 7,376,703 2,461,928 7,290,787 -1.16% April 10,510,823 3,134,120 10,347,043 -1.56% May 19,347,867 8,837,044 19,290,212 -0.30% June 21,924,850 2,576,983 21,853,448 -0.33% July 24,4S3,S03 2,528,653 24,106,033 -1.42% August 27,071,593 2,618,090 September 29,450,864 2,379,271 October 33,497,347 4,046,483 November 42,070,966 8,573,619 December 44,640,708 2,569,742 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2022 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 376,007 $ 376,007 $ 135,500 -63.96% February 604,057 228,050 377,997 -37.42% March 942,203 338,145 551,531 -41.46% April 1,215,412 273,209 923,535 -24.01% May 1,570,915 355,503 1,301,746 -17.13% June 1,942,927 372,012 1,703,080 -12.34% July 2,344,831 401,904 2,043,169 -12.86% August 2,781,982 437,151 September 3,225,577 443,595 October 3,626,122 400,545 November 4,018,664 392,542 December 4,400,000 381,336 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O CL C M C lL t r C O M N N O N 21 3 O 0. O U a M a M t r C O M 21 7 7 �.i C d E t t� M 4+ a w Packet Pg. 18 1 SALES TAX SUMMARY I 7.2.a I Construction Trade, $978,353 Accodation, $23,736 Clothing and Accessories, $212,740 Comawnications, $131,511 Wholesale Trade, — $208,818 12,000,000 10,000, 000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 ,905,122 Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: July 2022 Year -to -Date Total $6,337,518 Amusement & Automotive Repair, Recreation, $42,386 $134,596 Health & Personal Business Services, Gasoline, $60 Care, $44,216 $673,026 Misc Retail, $1,222,364 Others, $169,295 Retail Food Stores, W-P-- $200,594 Retail Automotive $1,551,113 Manufacturing, $71,469 Eating & Drinking, $673,239 Annual Sales Tax Revenue $7,395,114 $8,4�96 $8,4� 15 $8,317,046 2016 2017 2018 20110 V 2020 $10,302,518 $6,337,518 2021 YTD 2022 5 I Packet Pg. 19 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2022 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 763,651 $ 763,651 $ 857,872 12.34% February 1,704,609 940,958 1,853,000 8.71% March 2,420,254 715,646 2,666,259 10.16% April 3,074,639 654,384 3,469,412 12.84% May 3,893,081 818,442 4,483,349 15.16% June 4,672,507 779,426 5,402,133 15.62% July 5,523,403 850,896 6,337,518 14.74% August 6,439,084 915,680 September 7,293,649 854,565 October 8,203,996 910,347 November 9,139,425 935,429 December 10,000,000 860,575 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2022 Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 79,399 $ 79,399 $ 96,596 21.66% February 164,205 84,806 96,596 -41.17% March 246,125 81,920 305,138 23.98% April 313,860 67,734 397,808 26.75% May 367,416 53,556 469,966 27.91% June 402,173 34,757 524,767 30.48% July 429,975 27,802 563,428 31.04% August 452,332 22,357 September 472,668 20,335 October 496,035 23,367 November 534,998 38,963 December 595,000 60,002 Gas Utility Tax 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O CL C M C LL t r C O N N O N 21 M O CL O U a M C LL t r C O 7 �.i C d E t U M 4+ a 6 Packet Pg. 20 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2022 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 53,352 $ 53,352 $ 43,844 -17.82% February 96,981 43,629 66,255 -31.68% March 143,255 46,275 130,244 -9.08% April 192,397 49,142 175,045 -9.02% May 232,481 40,084 208,020 -10.52% June 277,770 45,288 250,253 -9.91% July 321,046 43,277 293,198 -8.67% August 362,710 41,663 September 400,099 37,389 October 445,363 45,264 November 482,039 36,676 December 523,000 40,961 Electric Utility Tax Telephone Utility Tax 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ February March April May June July August September October November December 148,905 $ 312,488 449,608 602,286 723,393 824,492 920,639 1,015,921 1,108,535 1,199,070 1,299,972 1,410,000 148,905 $ 183,023 163,583 377,116 137,121 534,798 152,678 726,969 121,107 858,720 101,099 993,628 96,147 1,117, 008 95,282 92,614 90,535 100,902 110,028 22.91 20.68 18.95 20.70% 18.71 20.51 21.33 Electric Utility Tax 1,zsuu,uuu 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. Packet Pg. 21 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2022 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 809,979 $ 809,979 $ 827,704 2.19% February 1,383,405 573,426 1,383,308 -0.01% March 2,213,219 829,814 2,127,271 -3.88% April 2,744,029 530,810 2,688,719 -2.02% May 3,542,697 798,668 3,507,398 -1.00% June 4,167,857 625,160 4,071,843 -2.30% July 5,138,308 970,451 4,964,389 -3.38% August 5,986,736 848,427 September 7,133,311 1,146,575 October 7,954,825 821,514 November 8,891,706 936,881 December 9,464,783 573,077 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2022 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 426,464 $ 426,464 $ 417,730 -2.05% February 1,352,938 926,475 1,322,856 -2.22% March 1,779,789 426,851 1,740,623 -2.20% April 2,159,443 379,654 2,114,167 -2.10% May 2,586,880 427,437 2,531,673 -2.13% June 2,966,444 379,564 2,904,040 -2.10% July 3,385,868 419,425 3,322,096 -1.88% August 4,311,526 925,657 September 4,738,766 427,240 October 5,118,192 379,426 November 5,545,860 427,668 December 5,911,497 365,637 Storm Water Sales 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget - Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O CL C M C LL t r C O N N O N 21 M O CIL U a M a LL 21 t r C O M 21 M �.i C d E t U M a Packet Pg. 22 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2022 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 863,521 $ 863,521 $ 877,046 1.57% February 1,571,494 707,973 1,604,010 2.07% March 2,435,565 864,071 2,451,231 0.64% April 3,143,499 707,934 3,183,083 1.26% May 4,009,811 866,312 4,066,458 1.41% June 4,719,932 710,121 4,800,930 1.72% July 5,593,564 873,631 5,679,193 1.53% August 6,307,925 714,362 September 7,215,145 907,220 October 7,936,868 721,723 November 8,819,637 882,769 December 9,528,089 708,452 r Q *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 9 Packet Pg. 23 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2022 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 5,342,104 $ 5,342,104 $ 4,585,579 -14.16% February 9,224,399 3,882,295 8,118,010 -11.99% March 13,452,004 4,227,605 11,949,976 -11.17% April 17,153,547 3,701,543 15,453,486 -9.91% May 21,079,517 3,925,970 19,128,482 -9.26% June 25,951,414 4,871,897 23,484,941 -9.50% July 30,080,975 4,129,561 27,097,845 -9.92% August 33,988,564 3,907,589 September 38,118,760 4,130,195 October 42,643,501 4,524,741 November 47,393,697 4,750,196 December 52,360,872 4,967,175 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2022 Non -Departmental Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 2,507,470 $ 2,507,470 $ 2,083,892 -16.89% February 3,542,042 1,034,573 2,922,333 -17.50% March 4,860,388 1,318,346 4,072,745 -16.21% April 5,664,390 804,002 5,019,960 -11.38% May 6,660,696 996,306 5,987,679 -10.10% June 8,505,096 1,844,400 7,606,046 -10.57% July 9,569,495 1,064,399 8,530,659 -10.86% August 10,445,244 875,749 September 11,460,143 1,014,899 October 12,738,982 1,278,840 November 14,162,256 1,423,274 December 15,574,121 1,411,865 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O CL C M C tL t r C O M N N O N 21 3 O 0. O U a M a M t r C O M 21 7 7 �.i C d E t t� M -W a 10 Packet Pg. 24 1 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2022 City Council Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 33,985 $ 33,985 $ 23,687 -30.30% February 71,308 37,323 43,670 -38.76% March 112,128 40,821 71,408 -36.32% April 150,174 38,046 100,819 -32.87% May 199,408 49,234 129,439 -35.09% June 253,207 53,799 157,419 -37.83% July 291,886 38,679 188,068 -35.57% August 345,215 53,328 September 382,380 37,165 October 414,981 32,601 November 455,321 40,340 December 497,900 42,579 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2022 Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 36,522 $ 36,522 $ 28,255 -22.63% February 74,639 38,117 59,226 -20.65% March 111,240 36,600 89,568 -19.48% April 148,486 37,247 119,372 -19.61% May 185,158 36,671 148,671 -19.71% June 221,111 35,953 178,561 -19.24% July 257,901 36,789 208,847 -19.02% August 295,030 37,129 September 331,738 36,709 October 367,805 36,067 November 405,747 37,941 December 443,913 38,166 Office of Mayor 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-CurrentYeaz Budget --&---PriorYeaz *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 11 Packet Pg. 25 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2022 Human Resources Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 77,402 $ 77,402 $ 59,932 -22.57% February 141,639 64,236 135,524 -4.32% March 202,815 61,176 203,581 0.38% April 266,756 63,941 270,474 1.39% May 331,195 64,439 334,902 1.12% June 405,872 74,678 458,397 12.94% July 464,145 58,273 537,794 15.87% August 524,126 59,981 September 590,408 66,282 October 654,662 64,254 November 726,800 72,138 December 824,831 98,031 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2022 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 104,268 $ 104,268 $ 91,643 -12.11% February 213,906 109,638 187,919 -12.15% March 322,490 108,584 284,025 -11.93% April 431,592 109,102 386,046 -10.55% May 548,505 116,913 482,322 -12.07% June 654,584 106,079 591,066 -9.70% July 763,667 109,084 691,341 -9.47% August 884,110 120,443 September 995,910 111,800 October 1,110,987 115,077 November 1,227,059 116,072 December 1,368,755 141,696 Municipal Court 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-CurrentYeaz Budget -m-PriorYear *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O CL C M C LL t r C O N N O N 21 M O CL O U a M C LL t r C O 7 7 �.i C d E t U M 4+ a 12 Packet Pg. 26 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2022 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 49,857 $ 49,857 $ 33,127 -33.56% February 103,113 53,256 72,230 -29.95% March 155,568 52,455 122,479 -21.27% April 205,451 49,882 179,118 -12.82% May 260,752 55,301 216,588 -16.94% June 315,986 55,234 250,483 -20.73% July 373,132 57,147 288,425 -22.70% August 434,777 61,645 September 492,000 57,223 October 552,240 60,239 November 622,590 70,351 December 719,388 96,798 O CL FY C M C ILL t r C O N N O N 3 O CL O U C M C LL z r C O 7 r C d E z U M 4+ a *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 13 Packet Pg. 27 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund 2022 Technology Rental Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 176,962 $ 176,962 $ 216,858 22.55% February 334,966 158,004 287,295 -14.23% March 484,397 149,431 502,978 3.84% April 566,805 82,408 545,022 -3.84% May 674,037 107,232 603,046 -10.53% June 784,541 110,504 705,231 -10.11% July 877,847 93,306 771,437 -12.12% August 989,174 111,327 September 1,106,217 117,044 October 1,245,373 139,155 November 1,341,722 96,350 December 1,539,022 197,300 Administrative Services Technology Rental Fund 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget -d Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ February March April May June July August September October November December 238,721 $ 399,953 563,330 729,233 896,198 1,121,628 1,314,351 1,478,599 1,647,511 1,824,204 1,989,608 2,156,911 238,721 $ 217,022 161,232 380,532 163,378 547,460 165,903 722,690 166,965 901,287 225,430 1,088,001 192,723 1,236,936 164,248 168,911 176,693 165,404 167,303 -9.09 -4.86 -2.82 -0.90 0.57 -3.00 -5.89 Administrative Services 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget - Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 14 Packet Pg. 28 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2022 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 80,982 $ 80,982 $ 77,656 -4.11% February 161,963 80,982 155,234 -4.16% March 242,945 80,982 233,065 -4.07% April 323,927 80,982 287,018 -11.39% May 404,908 80,982 388,315 -4.10% June 485,890 80,982 465,893 -4.12% July 566,871 80,982 545,067 -3.85% August 647,853 80,982 September 728,835 80,982 October 809,816 80,982 November 890,798 80,982 December 971,780 80,982 Police City Attorney 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"-- Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 1,045,238 $ 1,045,238 $ 973,358 -6.88% February 2,105,968 1,060,730 1,945,020 -7.64% March 3,177,596 1,071,629 3,008,075 -5.33% April 4,236,492 1,058,896 4,001,453 -5.55% May 5,296,298 1,059,805 5,133,192 -3.08% June 6,428,932 1,132,634 6,213,167 -3.36% July 7,551,012 1,122,080 7,213,970 -4.46% August 8,579,704 1,028,692 September 9,657,485 1,077,782 October 10,845,669 1,188,184 November 12,168,634 1,322,964 December 13,375,470 1,206,836 Police 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --"- Current Yeaz Budget �Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O CL C LL t r C O N N O N 21 3 O sZ O U c C LL t r C O M 21 7 �.i C d E t U O a 15 Packet Pg. 29 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services 2022 Development Services Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 272,173 $ 272,173 $ 309,139 13.58% February 567,186 295,012 661,303 16.59% March 860,247 293,062 909,669 5.75% April 1,174,618 314,370 1,157,411 -1.46% May 1,488,050 313,432 1,419,912 -4.58% June 1,792,716 304,666 1,678,976 -6.34% July 2,114,310 321,593 1,985,079 -6.11% August 2,423,605 309,295 September 2,733,462 309,857 October 3,039,102 305,640 November 3,402,002 362,901 December 3,791,859 389,857 Parks & Recreation Development Services 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -0-- Current Yeaz Budget -d Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2022 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 358,065 $ 358,065 $ 319,222 -10.85% February 748,023 389,958 651,988 -12.84% March 1,136,243 388,220 1,040,803 -8.40% April 1,535,144 398,902 1,354,932 -11.74% May 1,941,016 405,872 1,709,318 -11.94% June 2,369,808 428,792 2,119,385 -10.57% July 2,835,053 465,245 2,564,042 -9.56% August 3,347,305 512,252 September 3,871,489 524,184 October 4,291,784 420,295 November 4,690,353 398,569 December 5,125,535 435,182 Parks & Recreation 5,500,000 4,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -*-- Current Yeaz Budget -0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 16 Packet Pg. 30 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration 2022 Public Works Administration Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 49,466 $ 49,466 $ 22,716 -54.08% February 100,066 50,600 46,637 -53.39% March 150,167 50,100 71,242 -52.56% April 201,867 51,701 94,556 -53.16% May 252,421 50,554 117,239 -53.55% June 303,852 51,431 140,684 -53.70% July 355,684 51,832 163,431 -54.05% August 405,471 49,786 September 455,172 49,701 October 504,185 49,013 November 567,424 63,239 December 614,113 46,689 Facilities Maintenance Public Works Administration 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget � Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2022 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 219,301 $ 219,301 $ 109,202 -50.20% February 456,337 237,035 369,398 -19.05% March 723,326 266,990 562,089 -22.29% April 964,010 240,684 782,173 -18.86% May 1,206,775 242,765 942,003 -21.94% June 1,404,870 198,095 1,081,995 -22.98% July 1,647,775 242,905 1,236,300 -24.97% August 1,934,891 287,116 September 2,271,751 336,861 October 2,655,928 384,177 November 2,962,277 306,349 December 3,425,275 462,998 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 17 Packet Pg. 31 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2022 Engineering Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 225,595 $ 225,595 $ 226,829 0.55% February 452,988 227,392 457,182 0.93% March 684,071 231,083 685,977 0.28% April 917,956 233,885 914,235 -0.41% May 1,175,026 257,070 1,140,813 -2.91% June 1,412,521 237,495 1,368,545 -3.11% July 1,660,688 248,167 1,597,752 -3.79% August 1,900,016 239,329 September 2,131,816 231,799 October 2,366,570 234,755 November 2,602,612 236,042 December 2,845,336 242,724 Engine a ring 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC � Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 18 Packet Pg. 32 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVINUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 44,640,708 $ 25,583,320 $ 24,106,033 $ 20,534,675 540 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 225,000 - 112,500 112,500 500 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND - 2,500 - - 00 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 119,645 - 22,390 97,255 190 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND - 150 1,150 (1,150) 00 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 200,000 - 200,000 - 1000 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 167,210 1,645 885 166,325 10 Ill STREET FUND 1,751,930 1,042,541 988,280 763,650 560 C 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 1 13,684,871 1,135,453 1,711,170 11,973,701 O 130 d 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 216,701 27,138 96,406 120,295 440 iC 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - 447 - - 04 'V 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 84,410 34,240 54,413 29,997 C 640 C 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,540 11,638 12,725 13,815 480 li 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,550 306 727 823 470 t r 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 29,590 12,768 18,997 10,593 640 G 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2 2,271,020 1,505,209 1,069,772 1,201,248 474 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2 2,261,030 1,496,114 1,063,137 1,197,893 N 470 G 127 GIFT S CAT ALOG FUND3 82,750 41,374 2,970,680 (2,887,930) 35900 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 182,430 168,463 126,523 55,907 690 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 4,330 3,685 1,977 2,353 460 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 43,520 40,206 24,549 18,971 560 0 CL 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,290 2,737 2,683 7,607 260 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 79,349 60,185 66,328 13,021 844 tt 141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 65,000 40,407 32,377 32,623 500 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 4,856,549 5,946,550 5,952,359 (1,095,810) 1230 LL 143 TREE FUND 215,330 - 241 215,089 00 % z 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 611,370 40,853 41,009 570,361 74 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 4 3,822,685 385,689 1,741,465 2,081,220 O 460 M 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 5,590 93,080 (93,080) 04 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 11,018,136 5,845,898 5,805,093 5,213,043 7 530 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 5 7,877,897 3,903,543 3,757,939 4,119,958 484 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 6 24,820,083 12,990,644 11,860,767 12,959,316 480 z 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,700 600,423 592,065 1,396,635 300 M 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,925,920 886,499 1,057,748 868,172 r� 554 Q 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,153,570 715,800 674,665 478,905 580 $ 124,438,114 $ 62,532,012 $ 64,260,132 $ 60,177,982 520 Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Traffic Impact fee in March 2022. z REET revenues are down a total of $(835,896) from this point in time last year. i Differences due to a large donation received in June of 2022. 4 Differences due to Grant reimbursement received in 2022 for 2021, as well as a large Park Impact fee in March 2022. 5 2022 Utility Rate Increases are 4.5%for Water, 5%for Sewer, and 9.5%for Storm Drain. 6 Differences due primarily to WWTP partner bilings in 2021. 19 Packet Pg. 33 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 1 C ITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERAL FUND $ 52,360,872 $ 24,346,357 $ 27,097,845 $ 25,263,027 520, 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 260,490 193,928 170,531 89,959 650/ 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,900 - - 5,900 00 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 545,000 - 17,074 527,926 30, 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND - 16,149 - - 00 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 200,000 123,581 - 200,000 00 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND - 28,445 - - 00 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 45,800 - - 45,800 001 O III STREET FUND 2,315,780 1,256,963 1,263,886 1,051,894 550 d 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 12,868,796 1,307,320 722,544 12,146,252 60/ 117 MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND 195,380 22,318 60,699 134,681 310/ tt 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 100,900 32,289 36,018 64,882 360, C 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 - - 26,880 04 jL 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 - 3,000 00 r 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 28,200 - 533 27,667 20/ O 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 4,589,688 246,022 988,448 3,601,240 220, M N 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2,483,667 568,724 239,583 2,244,084 100 G 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 78,400 32,879 20,260 58,140 260/ 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 220,561 118,129 113,496 107,065 5101 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 50,000 - 2,540 47,460 50, 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 25,000 19,211 - 25,000 0 04 CL O 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 11,900 - 70 11,830 1° W 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 87,680 30,144 36,407 51,273 420/ .@ U 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 6,077,492 - 461,521 5,615,971 8° r- 143 TREE FUND 214,800 - - 214,800 04 LL 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 611,370 40,853 41,009 570,361 70/ >% t 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 7,614,418 243,769 2,939,095 4,675,323 390/ _ O 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 11,490,988 4,219,882 3,610,757 7,880,231 310, 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 9,619,649 2,621,939 2,406,422 7,213,227 250, 7 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,529,856 14,690,197 9,875,949 19,653,907 330/ 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 600,417 589,342 1,399,368 300 y 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,950,371 799,843 761,458 1,188,913 390, s t� 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,539,022 572,585 771,437 767,585 500, 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND - 63,132 - - 00 Q $ 147,140,570 $ 52,195,076 $ 52,226,924 $ 94,913,646 350, 20 Packet Pg. 34 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 3 Title TAXES: 1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 2 EMS PROPERTY TAX 3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX 4 LOCAL RETAIL SALESIUSE TAX 7 5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 8 GAS UTILITY TAX 9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 10 WATERUTILITY TAX 11 SEWER UTILITY TAX 12 ST ORMWAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX 13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 15 PULLTABSTAX 16 AMUSEMENT GAMES 17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LICENSES AND PERMITS: 18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE 19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST 22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT 23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER 24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 28 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 29 ANIMAL LICENSES 30 STREET AND CURB PERMIT 31 OT R NON -BUS LIC/PERMIT S INTERGOVERNMENTAL: 32 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 33 WA ASSOC OF SHERRIF'S TRAFFIC GRANT 34 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 35 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2 36 WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT 37 WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION 38 DOC FAC ROOFING 39 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY 40 WA STATE ART COMMISSION 2021-003-CD 41 2022-2023 BIENNUM ONE-TIME ALLOCATION 42 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 43 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT 44 CJ -POPULATION 45 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS 46 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION 47 DUI - CITIES 48 FIRE INS PREMIUM TAX 49 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 50 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 51 MISCELLANEOUS INTERLOCAL REVENUE 52 INTERLOCAL GRANTS 53 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND 54 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ. 55 VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS C ITY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 Budget Revenues 7/31/2022 Amount Revenues Remaining %Received $ 11,127,000 $ 5,820,281 $ 5,761,874 $ 5,365,126 520/ 4,278,000 2,295,063 2,294,959 1,983,041 540/ 500 1 32 468 60/ 10,000,000 5,699,002 6,337,518 3,662,482 630/ 7,600 6,644 10,796 (3,196) 1420/ 870,000 529,162 583,066 286,934 670/ 1,410,000 1,105,355 1,117,008 292,992 790r 595,000 489,128 563,428 31,572 950/ 284,000 204,210 209,730 74,270 740r 953,000 514,074 496,381 456,619 520/ 894,600 528,207 483,064 411,536 540/ 471,900 299,942 332,213 139,687 700/ 792,000 460,775 479,212 312,788 610/ 523,000 322,813 293,198 229,802 560r 55,200 52,580 48,415 6,785 880/ 350 143 - 350 00/ 306,000 143,456 154,393 151,607 5001 32,568,150 18,470,834 19,165,287 13,402,863 59F 250 450 100 150 400/ 700 - 20 680 30r 40,000 18,595 42,307 (2,307) 1060/ 702,700 500,753 523,616 179,084 750/ 41,000 22,286 20,913 20,087 5101 100,600 32,964 24,677 75,923 250/ 384,000 271,246 199,970 184,030 520/ 250,000 138,903 140,724 109,276 560/ 63,000 51,550 60,775 2,225 960/ 30,000 14,440 30,173 (173) 1010/ 650,600 433,381 482,204 168,396 740/ 24,000 8,799 11,708 12,292 490r 55,000 35,101 65,441 (10,441) 1190/ 20,000 11,328 12,505 7,495 630r 2,361,850 1,539,796 1,615,133 746,717 680, 9,000 6,464 5,237 3,763 580/ - - 992 (992) 00/ 11,100 916 718 10,382 60r - 3,947 - - 00/ 3,448 307 (307) 00/ - - 2,000 (2,000) 00/ - 379,270 - - 00/ 273,000 - - 273,000 00/ - 6,000 - - 00/ 168,950 - - 00/ 210,500 - - 210,500 00/ 16,740 8,070 10,776 5,964 640r 13,070 10,362 10,942 2,128 840/ 45,600 36,923 38,827 6,773 850/ 60,000 35,791 49,330 10,670 820/ 4,500 5,143 3,497 1,003 780/ - 53,334 56,744 (56,744) 00/ 261,500 216,694 221,986 39,514 850/ 343,200 167,820 166,379 176,821 480/ - 13,780 (13,780) 00/ - 27,216 - - 00/ 1,000 335 279 721 280i 550 - - 550 00/ - 66,000 - - 00/ 1,249,760 1,196,682 581,793 667,967 470, O O. C O C LL z r c O 2 N N O N 3 O CL O C R C iL z C O C d z t� t0 a 7 2022 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $638,516 higher than 2021 revenues. Please also see pagespages 5 & 6. 21 1 Packet Pg. 35 1 7.2.a Page 2 of 3 C TTY O F IDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: 1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES 3 CREDIT CARD FEES 4 COURT RECORD SERVICES 5 D/M COURT REC SER 6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE 7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE 8 IT TIME PAY FEE 9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS 11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 13 PHOTOCOPIES 14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES 17 CUSTODIAL SERVICES (SNO-ISLE) 18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 24 LEGAL SERVICES 25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 26 BOOKING FEES 27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTSFROM STATIONS 31 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 33 PLAN CHECKING FEES 34 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 35 PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW 37 CRITICAL AREA STUDY 38 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 39 PROGRAM FEES 40 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 41 HOLIDAY MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 42 UPTOWN EVENING MARKET FEES 43 WINTER MARKET FEES 44 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 45 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS $ 3,000 $ 3,566 $ 3,241 $ (241) 1080/ 600 98 141 459 230/ 11,000 3,322 441 10,559 40r 150 2 1 149 10/ 300 - - 300 00/ - 168 - - 00/ 4,000 98 98 3,902 20/ 1,000 375 54 946 501 50 117 128 (78) 2560/ 100 - - 100 00/ 25,000 - - 25,000 00/ 600 - - 600 00/ 1,000 165 51 949 501 5,000 - - 5,000 00/ 180,000 147,941 130,437 49,563 720/ 1,400 - 2,885 (1,485) 2060/ 85,000 49,902 66,573 18,427 780/ 10,000 - 2,873 7,127 290/ 30,000 - - 30,000 00/ 14,000 2,505 3,169 10,831 230/ 210,970 153,619 105,485 105,485 5001 - 20 25 (25) 00/ 57,000 45,982 49,842 7,158 870/ 1,050 309 702 348 670r 38,000 18,812 11,221 26,779 300/ 3,000 610 371 2,629 120i 10,000 16,202 17,049 (7,049) 1700/ 3,500 1,427 460 3,040 130/ 1,007,500 465,101 486,524 520,976 480r 2,500 2,140 2,356 144 940/ 100 - - 100 00/ 65,600 70,163 69,248 (3,648) 1060r 425,000 305,471 212,529 212,471 5001 4,000 11,349 9,371 (5,371) 2340/ 500 158 110 390 220/ 3,000 3,700 4,440 (1,440) 1480/ 14,000 10,450 10,375 3,625 740/ 13,000 31 1,272 11,728 100/ 1,011,580 315,996 385,188 626,392 380/ 1,300 - - 1,300 00/ 5,000 3,885 370 4,630 70/ - 2,040 4,290 (4,290) 00/ - - 7,310 (7,310) 00/ 1,000 - - 1,000 00/ 4,011,558 1,966,602 687,450 3,324,108 170/ 7,261,358 3,602,324 2,276,080 4,985,278 310i 22 Packet Pg. 36 7.2.a Page 3 of 3 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received FINES AND PENALTIES: 1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 6 OTHER INFRACTIONS'04 7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 8 PARK/INDDISZONE 9 DWI PENALTIES 10 DUI - DP ACCT 11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI 12 DUI - DP FEE 13 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 14 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 15 CRIM CONV FEE CT 16 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 17 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 18 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 19 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 20 CRIM CONV FEE CN 21 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 22 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 23 COURT COST RECOUPMENT 24 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 25 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES MISCELLANEOUS: 26 INVESTMENT INTEREST 27 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 28 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 29 SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS 30 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 31 LEASES LONG TERM 32 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION 33 PARKS DONATIONS 34 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 35 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 36 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 37 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 38 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 39 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT 40 POLICE JUDGMENT S✓RESTITUTION 41 CASHIERS OVERAGES✓SHORTAGES 42 OTHER MISCREVENUES 43 SMALL OVERPAYMENT 44 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 45 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 46 NSF FEES -POLICE 47 NSF FEES - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 48 US BANK REBATE TRANSFERS -IN: 49 OPERATING TRANSFER IN 50 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM FUND 018 51 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 TO TAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 2,000 $ 1,668 $ 968 $ 1,032 480/ 230,000 119,851 37,523 192,477 160/ 18,000 6,214 2,599 15,401 140/ 10,000 8,783 2,504 7,496 250/ 1,000 6,803 - 1,000 00/ 1,500 997 698 802 470/ 100,000 35,562 13,372 86,628 130/ 2,000 250 114 1,886 60/ 7,000 4,189 2,005 4,995 290/ 300 73 47 253 160/ 100 59 18 82 180/ 1,500 1,098 838 662 560/ 25,000 9,835 5,838 19,162 230/ 2,000 1,221 860 1,140 430/ 700 56 103 597 150/ 100 12 - 100 00/ 10,000 764 8,383 1,617 840/ 800 215 27 773 30/ 1,000 159 225 775 220/ 200 64 - 200 00/ 8,000 3,475 1,933 6,067 240/ 14,000 5,184 1,827 12,173 130/ 3,000 1,191 196 2,804 70/ 10,100 - 50 10,050 00/ 150 187 - 150 00/ 448,450 207,909 80,130 368,320 IF 270,390 207,006 129,961 140,429 480/ 13,340 4,670 5,047 8,293 380/ 10,180 5,010 3,225 6,955 320/ 153,000 47,383 96,212 56,789 630/ 2,100 - - 2,100 00/ 205,000 112,074 120,296 84,704 590/ 2,500 - 239 2,261 100/ 3,500 750 5,050 (1,550) 1440/ 1,500 1,510 1,515 (15) 1010/ 5,000 3,503 249 4,751 50/ 300 118 76 224 250/ 3,800 6,371 1,761 2,039 460/ 2,000 - - 2,000 00/ 2,000 102 - 2,000 00/ 200 50 55 145 280/ - 21 100 (100) 00/ 41,180 4,822 4,550 36,630 110/ 100 68 36 64 360/ 100 30 30 70 300/ 150 - 30 120 200/ - 30 - - 00/ - - 60 (60) 00/ 8,500 7,079 5,970 2,530 700/ 724,840 4009597 374,460 350,380 52°/ 28,445 - - 00/ - 123,581 - - 00/ 26,300 13,150 13,150 13,150 500/ 26,300 165,176 13,150 13,150 500/ $ 44,640,708 $ 25,583,320 $ 24,106,033 $ 20,534,675 540/ 23 Packet Pg. 37 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 6 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 19,196,413 $ 9,886,954 $ 10,104,040 $ 9,092,373 53°/a 2 OVERTIME 594,080 352,609 644,898 (50,818) 1090/0 3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK 294,001 3,558 10,798 283,203 4°/a 4 BENEFITS 6,820,049 3,695,644 3,768,602 3,051,447 5501c 5 UNIFORMS 119,151 42,751 51,197 67,954 430% 6 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 70,944 - 48,981 21,963 69°/a 7 SUPPLIES 481,165 238,730 248,442 232,723 52% 8 FUEL CONSUMED - 125 - - 0°/a 9 SMALL EQUIPMENT 204,019 91,741 96,178 107,841 470/a 10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,411,043 7,386,112 8,621,986 8,789,057 50ON 11 COMMUNICATIONS 171,235 105,171 83,900 87,335 49% 12 TRAVEL 81,155 15,729 32,784 48,371 40% 13 EXCISE TAXES 16,500 13,189 17,159 (659) 104°/a 14 RENTAL/LEASE 2,091,693 883,252 1,176,114 915,579 56% 15 INSURANCE 503,161 405,121 503,160 1 1MON 16 UTILITIES 529,462 305,613 325,757 203,705 620/c 17 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 1,090,350 301,053 258,460 831,890 24ON 18 MISCELLANEOUS 652,023 273,974 298,849 353,174 46°/a 19 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 100% 20 BUILDINGS - - 45,195 (45,195) 0% 21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,385,000 234,945 542,500 842,500 39% 22 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - 96,343 (96,343) 00/0 23 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 270,180 - 270,180 00/0 24 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 55,170 - - 55,170 00/0 25 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 4,790 60,087 72,294 (67,504) 15090/c 26 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 268,788 - - 268,788 0% 27 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 212 288 42% 52,3 0,872 24,346,357 27,097,845 25,2 3,027 5207c LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009) 28 BENEFITS $ - $ 105,903 $ 104,944 $ (104,944) 00/0 29 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 252,990 71,025 51,398 201,592 200/c 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 17,000 13,704 (6,704) 196% 31 MISCELLANEOUS 500 - 485 15 970/c 260,490 1937928 170,531 89,959 65% HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) 32 SUPPLIES $ 100 $ $ - $ 100 0°/a 33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 200 00/0 34 MISCELLANEOUS 5,600 5,600 00/0 5,900 - 5,900 0% BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016) 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 195,000 $ $ 450 $ 194,550 0% 36 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 150,000 16,072 133,928 110/0 37 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 90,000 552 89,448 10/0 38 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 110,000 - 110,000 0% 545,000 17,074 527,926 30/c MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION (017) 39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ - $ 16,149 $ - $ - 00/0 - 16,149 - - 00/0 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018) 40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 00/0 41 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES - 123,581 - 0°/a 200,000 123,581 200,000 0% EDMONDS OPIOED RESPONSEFUND (019) 42 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $ - $ 28,445 $ $ - 00/0 - 28,445 - 0% DRUG INFO RCEMENTFUND (104) 43 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 45,000 $ - $ $ 45,000 00/0 44 REPAIR/MAINT 800 800 0% 45,800 45,800 00/0 a 24 Packet Pg. 38 Page 2 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent STREETFUND (111) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 749,110 $ 435,405 $ 406,779 $ 342,331 54% 2 OVERTIME 38,400 26,589 21,222 17,178 55% 3 BENEFITS 347,919 213,572 199,032 148,887 57% 4 UNIFORMS 6,000 5,432 3,912 2,088 65% 5 SUPPLIES 263,000 105,334 104,145 158,855 40% 6 SMALL EQUIPMENT 20,000 3,565 985 19,015 5% 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,210 7,396 11,039 12,171 48% 8 COMMUNICATIONS 4,500 3,988 3,687 814 82% 9 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 10 RENTAL/LEASE 290,150 143,256 170,584 119,566 59% 11 INSURANCE 184,111 148,533 184,111 0 100% 12 UTILITIES 273,730 141,461 132,316 141,414 48% 13 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 72,000 10,793 22,493 49,507 31% 14 MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 11,421 3,396 4,604 42% 15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 30,000 - - 30,000 0% 16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 4,270 - - 4,270 0% 17INTEREST 380 220 185 195 49% $ 2,315,780 $ 1,256,963 $ 1,263,886 $ 1,051,894 55% COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE(112) 18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 3,159,560 $ 630,663 $ 277,159 $ 2,882,401 9% 19 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 1,508,270 14,236 31,326 1,476,944 2% 20 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 108,975 39,925 - 108,975 0U/a 21 LAND - (842) 69,759 (69,759) 0% 22 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 8,018,521 549,545 270,868 7,747,653 3% 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,220 72,201 72,201 19 100% 24 INTEREST 1,250 1,591 1,230 20 98% $ 12,868,796 $ 1,307,320 $ 722,544 $ 12,146,252 6% MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) 25 SUPPLIES $ 4,700 $ 265 $ 930 $ 3,770 20% 26 SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,700 - - 1,700 0% 27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 180,000 19,862 57,429 122,571 32% 28 TRAVEL 80 - - 80 0% 29 RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 - 2,000 0% 30 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 0% 31 MISCELLANEOUS 6,600 2,191 2,340 4,260 35% $ 195,380 $ 22,318 $ 60,699 $ 134,681 31% HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REV NUE FUND (120) 32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,900 $ 30,289 $ 34,018 $ 61,882 35% 33 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 34 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 50% $ 100,900 $ 32,289 $ 36,018 $ 64,882 36U/a EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) 35 SUPPLIES $ 1,790 $ - $ - $ 1,790 0% 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,090 - 25,090 0% $ 26,880 $ $ $ 26,880 0% YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) 37 MISCELLANEOUS $ 3,000 $ $ $ 3,000 0% $ 3,000 $ $ $ 3,000 0% TO URISM PRO MO TIO NAL FUND/ARTS (123) 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 28,200 $ $ 533 $ 27,667 2% $ 28,200 $ $ 533 $ 27,667 2% O O. d is C O C IL z C O 2 N N O N 3 O CL O 2 U C O C LL z r C O 7 C d s t� t0 a 25 Packet Pg. 39 I 7.2.a I Page 3 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125) SUPPLIES $ 21,000 $ 36,880 $ 13,609 $ 7,391 65% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 469,320 86,569 241,246 228,074 51% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 668,258 72,284 98,419 569,839 15010 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2,534 - - 2,534 00/0 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,428,576 50,288 635,174 2,793,402 190/0 $ 4,589,688 $ 246,022 $ 988,448 $ 3,601,240 220/c REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126) 6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 8 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 10 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 11 INTEREST 12 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) 13 SUPPLIES 14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15 MISCELLANEOUS 16 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES CEMETERY MAINTENANCEIIMPROVEMENT(130) 17 SALARIES AND WAGES 18 OVERTIME 19 BENEFITS 20 UNIFORMS 21 SUPPLIES 22 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24 COMMUNICATIONS 25 TRAVEL 26 RENTAL/LEASE 27 UTILITIES 28 REPAIRS &MAINTENANCE 29 MISCELLANEOUS PARKS TRUSTFUND (136) 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137) 31 SMALL EQUIPMENT 32 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) 33 SUPPLIES 34 TRAVEL 35 MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENTDISTRICTFUND (140) 36 SUPPLIES 37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38 MISCELLANEOUS EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142) 39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE FUND (143) 40 SUPPLIES 41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42 LAND 2012 LTGO DEBTSERVIC FUND (231) 43 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 44 INTEREST $ 673,827 $ 231,419 $ 59,381 $ 614,446 90/0 878,353 51,435 16,897 861,456 20/c 144,970 11,863 10,138 134,833 7% 526,057 272,726 97,473 428,584 19% 149,820 - - 149,820 0% 110,640 1,282 55,314 55,326 50% - - 380 (380) 0% $ 2,483,667 $ 568,724 $ 239,583 $ 2,244,084 10% $ 45,000 $ 19,729 $ 7,110 $ 37,890 16% 6,500 - - 6,500 0% 600 - - 600 0% 26,300 13,150 13,150 13,150 50% $ 78,400 $ 32,879 $ 20,260 $ 58,140 26% $ 119,837 $ 57,696 $ 59,360 $ 60,477 50% 3,500 302 788 2,712 23% 41,069 23,304 22,941 18,128 56% 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 7,000 1,355 636 6,364 9% 20,000 18,724 10,702 9,298 54% 4,200 800 1,150 3,050 27% 1,700 982 1,004 696 59% 500 - - 500 0% 11,690 9,713 6,857 4,833 59% 5,565 2,687 2,540 3,025 46% 500 - 3,536 (3,036) 707% 4,000 2,567 3,981 19 100% $ 220,561 $ 118,129 $ 113,496 $ 107,065 51% $ 50,000 $ $ 2,540 $ 47,460 5% $ 50,000 $ $ 2,540 $ 47,460 5% $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0% - 19,211 - - 0% $ 25,000 $ 19,211 $ - $ 25,000 0% $ 1,500 $ $ $ 1,500 0% 4,500 4,500 0% 5,900 70 5,830 1% $ 11,900 $ $ 70 $ 11,830 1% $ 4,050 $ 394 $ 6,211 $ (2,161) 153% 77,535 28,529 29,441 48,094 38% 6,095 1,221 755 5,340 12% 87,680 30,144 36,407 51,273 42% $ 6,077,492 $ $ 461,521 $ 5,615,971 8% 6,077,492 461,521 5,615,971 8% $ 1,000 $ $ $ 1,000 0% 14,800 14,800 0% 199,000 199,000 0% 214,800 214,800 0% $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ 550,000 0% 61,370 40,853 41,009 20,361 67% $ 611,370 $ 40,853 $ 41,009 $ 570,361 7% O Q d w i0 C O c li z r C O 2 N N O N 3 O M O lY U C R C M 21 z C O 2 21 7 C d E z U M 4� a 26 Packet Pg. 40 I 7.2.a I Page 4 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title 2022 Amended Budget 7/31/2021 Expenditures 7/31/2022 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332) 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 95,832 $ 132,730 $ 256,601 $ (160,769) 268% 2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 63,000 - 62,656 344 990/0 3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 7,357,188 - 26,059 7,331,129 0% 4 INTEREST - 111,039 2,593,779 (2,593,779) 0% 5 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 98,398 - - 98,398 0% $ 7,614,418 $ 243,769 $ 2,939,095 $ 4,675,323 39% WATER FUND (421) 6 SALARIES AND WAGES 7 OVERTIME 8 BENEFIT S 9 UNIFORMS 10 SUPPLIES 11 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 12 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 13 SMALL EQUIPMENT 14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15 COMMUNICATIONS 16 TRAVEL 17 EXCISE TAXES 18 RENTAL/LEASE 19INSURANCE 20 UTILITIES 21 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 22 MISCELLANEOUS 23 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 24 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 25 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 26 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 27 REVENUE BONDS 28 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 29 INTEREST 30 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS STORM FUND (422) 31 SALARIES AND WAGES 32 OVERTIME 33 BENEFITS 34 UNIFORMS 35 SUPPLIES 36 SMALL EQUIPMENT 37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38 COMMUNICATIONS 39 TRAVEL 40 EXCISE TAXES 41 RENTAL/LEASE 42INSURANCE 43 UTILITES 44 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 45 MISCELLANEOUS 46 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 47 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 48 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 49 REVENUE BONDS 50 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 51 INTEREST 52 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS $ 842,096 $ 383,026 $ 442,505 $ 399,591 53% 24,000 12,623 7,509 16,491 31% 330,100 165,487 186,506 143,594 56% 4,000 3,222 2,659 1,341 66% 150,000 50,352 86,409 63,591 58% 2,170,000 828,238 878,940 1,291,060 41% '- 170,000 116,024 90,186 79,814 5 3 % 0 CL 11,000 3,917 2,692 8,308 24% 41 2,237,439 1,225,335 357,654 1,879,785 16% 30,000 16,898 18,303 11,697 61% i0 200 - - 200 0% .v 1,649,700 773,963 749,620 900,080 45% M 152,590 74,497 87,940 64,650 5 8 % S 122,359 98,196 122,359 (0) 100% LL 35,000 16,590 18,843 16,157 54% 176,130 18,537 23,203 152,927 13% 123,600 103,151 112,618 10,982 91% p 645,370 198,136 194,533 450,837 3 0 % M 10,000 - 10,044 (44) 100% N 1,998,334 7,513 87,212 1,911,122 4% p 2,870 - - 2,870 0% N 399,780 - - 399,780 0% 25,840 25,839 25,839 1 100% 180,580 98,336 104,805 75,775 5 8 % v - - 378 (378) 0% $ 11,490,988 $ 4,219,882 $ 3,610,757 $ 7,880,231 31% Q. w $ 734,284 $ 403,768 $ 445,089 $ 289,195 61% 26,000 15,739 10,792 15,208 42% 294,767 175,860 185,073 109,694 63% C 6,500 5,049 5,543 957 85% C 46,000 22,824 30,874 15,126 67% LL 4,000 304 985 3,015 25% 3,481,263 961,163 479,713 3,001,550 14% z 3,200 3,591 3,229 (29) 101% = 4,300 150 1,982 2,318 46% G 470,100 348,881 385,427 84,673 82% 2 267,150 154,076 153,466 113,684 57% 82,335 66,228 82,335 (0) 100% 10,500 8,292 9,258 1,242 88% 67,130 19,629 12,402 54,728 18% d 232,300 147,195 120,211 112,089 52% E 297,787 76,327 74,810 222,977 25% v 3,137,333 100,618 281,617 2,855,716 9% M 104,540 - - 104,540 0% Q 195,390 - - 195,390 0% 53,590 53,576 61,590 (8,000) 115% 101,180 58,672 61,859 39,321 61% - - 165 (165) 0% $ 9,619,649 $ 2,621,939 $ 2,406,422 $ 7,213,227 25% 27 Packet Pg. 41 I 7.2.a I Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent SEWER FUND (423) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,090,461 $ 1,022,074 $ 1,057,085 $ 1,033,376 51°/a 2 OVERTIME 95,000 75,744 80,217 14,783 840/c 3 BENEFITS 847,408 452,348 423,799 423,609 50°/a 4 UNIFORMS 9,500 8,291 7,643 1,857 80°/a 5 SUPPLIES 421,000 231,036 176,105 244,895 42% 6 FUEL CONSUMED 60,000 52,818 - 60,000 0% 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE 4,000 - - 4,000 00/0 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 35,000 79,889 99,144 (64,144) 283°/a 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,315,884 3,053,848 1,258,368 1,057,516 54% 10 COMMUNICATIONS 43,000 24,126 26,166 16,834 610/c 11 TRAVEL 5,000 1,919 - 5,000 00/0 12 EXCISE TAXES 978,000 642,628 611,317 366,683 630/c 13 RENTAL/LEASE 317,410 216,261 186,374 131,036 59°/a 14 INSURANCE 202,407 162,851 203,936 (1,529) 1010/0 15 UTILITIES 1,532,060 739,572 1,488,020 44,040 97°/a 16 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 790,630 240,953 538,194 252,436 680/o 17 MISCELLANEOUS 126,350 - 68,126 58,224 540/u 18 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 78,431 145,210 (145,210) 0% 19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 6,388,519 1,953,015 1,175,403 5,213,116 180/c 20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 12,520,297 5,292,686 1,989,039 10,531,258 160/Q 21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 126,500 - - 126,500 0% 22 REVENUE BONDS 89,840 - - 89,840 0% 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 174,610 158,667 159,017 15,593 91O/C 24 INTEREST 356,980 199,266 179,830 177,150 500/c 25 DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 1,518 - - 0% 26 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 2 252 2 959 (2 959) 0% $ 29,529,856 $ 14,690,197 $ 9,875,949 $ 19,653,907 3 3 % BOND RESERVEFUND (424) 27 REVENUE BONDS $ 810,010 $ - $ - $ 810,010 0% 28 INTEREST 1,178,700 600,417 589,342 589,358 50% $ 1,988,710 $ 600,417 $ 589,342 $ 1,399,368 300/a O CL O io C M c li z r C O 2 N N O N 7 O M O U C M C LL z r C O 7 r C d 1= z t� c0 a 2s Packet Pg. 42 I 7.2.a I Page 6 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent EQ UIPNIENT RENTAL FUND (511) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 275,712 $ 159,491 $ 181,823 $ 93,889 66°/a 2 OVERTIME 2,000 1,573 222 1,778 110/0 3 BENEFITS 112,077 66,538 61,625 50,452 55ON 4 UNIFORMS 1,500 1,056 880 620 590/0 5 SUPPLIES 120,000 41,279 62,466 57,534 52% 6 FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENT ORY/RESALE 268,000 110,454 238,812 29,188 890/0 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 5,979 2,380 55,620 4% 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46,750 776 862 45,888 2% 10 COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,316 1,184 1,816 39% 11 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 12 RENTAL/LEASE 11,160 7,204 6,057 5,103 54% 13INSURANCE 49,172 39,334 51,903 (2,731) 106% 14 UTILITIES 14,000 10,232 12,317 1,683 88% 15 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 60,000 23,974 16,678 43,322 28% 16 MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 8,365 5,722 6,278 48% 17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 915,000 322,273 118,526 796,474 13% $ 1,950,371 $ 799,843 $ 761,458 $ 1,188,913 39% TEC HNO LO GY RENTAL FUND (512) 18 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 442,074 $ 178,504 $ 178,904 $ 263,170 40% 19 OVERTIME 2,000 1,987 677 1,323 34% 20 BENEFITS 159,538 61,553 69,227 90,311 43% 21 SUPPLIES 5,000 3,089 4,784 216 96% 22 SMALL EQUIPMENT 357,900 18,305 27,832 330,068 8% 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61,860 22,224 18,203 43,657 29% 24 COMMUNICATIONS 58,770 43,855 41,979 16,791 71% 25 TRAVEL 1,500 - - 1,500 0% 26 RENTAL/LEASE 7,460 5,348 2,602 4,858 35% 27 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 381,920 236,516 399,603 (17,683) 105% 28 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 1,205 1,280 3,720 26% 29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - 26,346 29,654 47% $ 1,539,022 $ 572,585 $ 771,437 $ 767,585 50% FIREMAN'S PENSION FUND (617) 30 BENEFITS $ - $ 15,483 $ - $ - 0% 31 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS - 36,149 - - 0% 32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,500 - - 0% $ - $ 63,132 $ - $ - 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS $ 147,140,570 $ 52,195,076 $ 52,226,924 $ 94,913,646 35% O M O io C M C li 21 z r C O 2 N N 0 N 3 O M O U C M C li 21 z r C O 2 7 r C d 1= z t� t0 a 29 Packet Pg. 43 7.2.a Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F IDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL OFFICE OF MAYOR HUMAN RESOURCES MUNICIPAL COURT CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CITY ATTORNEY NON -DEPARTMENTAL POLICE SERVICES SATELLITE OFFICE COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM PARKS & RECREATION PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Title $ 497,900 $ 192,621 $ 188,068 $ 309,832 38% 443,913 194,309 208,847 235,066 47% 824,831 419,004 537,794 287,037 65% 1,368,755 622,191 691,341 677,414 51% - 363,075 - - 0% 2,156,911 766,314 1,236,936 919,975 57% 971,780 492,368 545,067 426,713 56% _ 0 O CL 15,574,121 7,203,386 8,530,659 7,043,462 55% 13,375,470 6,626,850 7,213,970 6,161,500 54% io 166,576 - 50,104 116,472 30% CM C 719,388 308,903 288,425 430,963 40% j,i 21 3,791,859 1,730,845 1,985,079 1,806,780 52% r 459,109 31,912 60,031 399,078 13% 0 O 2 5,125,535 2,366,948 2,564,042 2,561,493 50% N N 3,459,449 1,857,140 1,761,183 1,698,266 51% N 3,425,275 1,170,492 1,236,300 2,188,975 36% 2+ 3 $ 52,360,872 $ 24,346,357 $ 27,097,845 $ 25,263,027 52% O 0. O CITY OF EDMO NDS U C EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY C LL 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent r WATER UTILITYFUND $ 11,490,988 $ 4,219,882 $ 3,610,757 $ 7,880,231 31% r_ 0 STORM UTILITY FUND 9,619,649 2,621,939 2,406,422 7,213,227 25% SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 29,529,856 14,690,197 9,875,949 19,653,907 33% w BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,710 600,417 589,342 1,399,368 30% d $ 52,629,203 $ 22,132,435 $ 16,482,470 $ 36,146,733 31% s t� t0 a 30 Packet Pg. 44 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 2 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Title 2022 Amended Budget 7/31/2021 Expenditures 7/31/2022 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent CPIY COUNCIL SALARIES AND WAGES $ 204,132 $ 116,857 $ 107,870 $ 96,262 53% BENEFITS 121,868 60,816 53,993 67,875 44% SUPPLIES 2,000 1,708 1,194 806 60% SERVICES 169,900 13,241 25,011 144,889 15% $ 497,900 $ 192,621 $ 188,068 $ 309,832 38% O FFIC E O F MAYO R SALARIES AND WAGES $ 232,296 $ 133,872 $ 145,000 $ 87,296 62% BENEFITS 81,787 48,767 49,915 31,872 61% SUPPLIES 1,500 358 1,664 (164) 111% SERVICES 128,330 11,312 12,268 116,062 10% $ 443,913 $ 194,309 $ 208,847 $ 235,066 47% HUMAN RESOURCES O CL SALARIES AND WAGES $ 398,299 $ 225,271 $ 274,667 $ 123,632 69% BENEFITS 142,526 85,669 93,441 49,085 66% SUPPLIES 13,600 1,156 701 12,899 5% SERVICES 270,406 106,907 168,985 101,421 62% C $ 824,831 $ 419,004 $ 537,794 $ 287,037 65% a C MUNICIPAL C O URT 11 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 910,606 $ 392,657 $ 443,519 $ 467,087 49% % BENEFITS 217,654 130,742 137,702 79,952 63% +�+ SUPPLIES 11,600 3,250 6,382 5,218 55% p SERVICES 228,895 95,542 103,738 125,157 45% M $ 1,368,755 $ 622,191 $ 691,341 $ 677,414 51% N C ITY CLERK G N SALARIES AND WAGES $ $ 166,661 $ $ 0% >% BENEFITS 67,480 0% SUPPLIES - 1,306 - 0% 0 SERVICES - 127,628 - 0% O $ - $ 363,075 $ - $ 0% Q' O ADMINIS TRATIVE S ERVIC ES SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,301,073 $ 509,270 $ 767,273 $ 533,800 59% BENEFITS 413,858 165,579 241,657 172,201 58% SUPPLIES 13,000 2,608 7,544 5,456 58% Mr SERVICES 428,980 88,857 220,462 208,518 51% - 'LL $ 2,156,911 $ 766,314 $ 1,236,936 $ 919,975 57% >, C ITY ATTO RNEY r SERVICES $ 971,780 $ 492,368 $ 545,067 $ 426,713 56% G $ 971,780 $ 492,368 $ 545,067 $ 426,713 56% NON -DEPARTMENTAL >+ SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,750 $ - $ - $ 101,750 0% BENEFITS 145,504 26,878 77,493 68,011 53% SUPPLIES 5,000 1,152 - 5,000 0% d SERVICES 13,557,619 6,830,323 7,788,161 5,769,458 57% E INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,435,000 284,945 592,500 842,500 41% DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL 55,170 - - 55,170 0% c�0 DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST 274,078 60,087 72,505 201,573 26% r� Q $ 15,574,121 $ 7,203,386 $ 8,530,659 $ 7,043,462 55% POLICE SERVICES SALARIES AND WAGES $ 8,723,512 $ 4,417,115 $ 4,638,140 $ 4,085,372 53% BENEFIT S 2,994,876 1,570,707 1,638,959 1,355,917 55% SUPPLIES 281,569 125,741 120,925 160,644 43% SERVICES 1,375,513 513,288 719,603 655,910 52% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 96,343 (96,343) 0% $ 13,375,470 $ 6,626,850 $ 7,213,970 $ 6,161,500 54% S ATELLITE O FFIC E SALARIES AND WAGES $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 0% BENEFIT S 5,000 - 5,000 0% SUPPLIES 12,000 11,057 943 92% SERVICES 124,576 39,047 85,529 31% $ 166,576 $ $ 50,104 $ 116,472 30% 31 Packet Pg. 45 Page 2 of 2 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2022 Amended 7/31/2021 7/31/2022 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES AND WAGES $ 365,627 $ 172,390 $ 117,085 $ 248,542 32% BENEFITS 111,361 52,439 36,228 75,133 33% SUPPLIES 4,075 509 269 3,806 7% SERVICES 238,325 83,565 134,843 103,482 57% $ 719,388 $ 308,903 $ 288,425 $ 430,963 40% DEVELO PMEVT S ERVIC ES /PLANNING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,978,832 $ 1,076,844 $ 1,176,411 $ 802,421 59% BENEFITS 681,706 373,058 411,480 270,226 60% SUPPLIES 19,400 4,504 4,503 14,897 23% SERVICES 1,111,921 276,440 392,686 719,235 35% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - - 0% $ 3,791,859 $ 1,730,845 $ 1,985,079 $ 1,806,780 52% HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM SALARIES AND WAGES $ 101,496 $ 25,730 $ 39,832 $ 61,664 39% BENEFITS 29,113 5,780 10,869 18,244 37% SUPPLIES 15,000 - 442 14,558 3% SERVICES 313,500 402 8,888 304,612 3% 459,109 31,912 60,031 399,078 13% PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,627,863 $ 1,342,835 $ 1,393,994 $ 1,233,869 53% BENEFITS 865,945 483,263 481,021 384,924 56% SUPPLIES 166,640 110,531 141,392 25,248 85% SERVICES 1,465,087 430,319 547,636 917,451 37% $ 5,125,535 $ 2,366,948 $ 2,564,042 $ 2,561,493 50% PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION SALARIES AND WAGES $ 387,424 $ 175,970 $ 75,620 $ 311,804 20% BENEFITS 126,689 61,687 36,545 90,144 29% SUPPLIES 9,600 7,381 2,733 6,867 28% SERVICES 90,400 52,064 48,533 41,867 54% $ 614,113 $ 297,102 $ 163,431 $ 450,682 27% FACILITIFS MAINTENANCE SALARIES AND WAGES 860,456 459,908 503,230 357,226 58% BENEFITS 369,679 196,988 203,041 166,638 55% SUPPLIES 128,000 69,597 45,413 82,587 35% SERVICES 1,796,960 443,999 439,421 1,357,539 24% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 270,180 - 45,195 224,986 17% $ 3,425,275 $ 1,170,492 $ 1,236,300 $ 2,188,975 36% ENGINEERING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 1,866,128 $ 1,027,744 $ 1,077,095 $ 789,033 58% BENEFITS 702,578 408,543 396,437 306,141 56% SUPPLIES 2,200 795 402 1,798 18% SERVICES 274,430 122,957 123,818 150,612 45% $ 2,845,336 $ 1,560,038 $ 1,597,752 $ 1,247,584 56% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 52,360,872 $ 24,346,357 $ 27,097,845 $ 25,263,027 52% a 32 Packet Pg. 46 7.2.a GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- & SUBFUNDS 7/31 /2022 7/31 /2022 Q2 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 001-General Fund * $ 12,939,537 $ 5,526,986 $ 3,027,697 $ (2,991,812 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 197,187 197,187 57,060 (58,031 011-Risk Management Reserve Fund 25,000 25,000 - - 012-ContingencyReserve Fund 1,782,150 1,782,150 - - 0 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 16,422 16,421 - - 016-Building Maintenance 4,405,316 4,405,316 1,816 5,316 017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation 849,767 849,766 - 1,150 c 018 - Edmonds Homelessness Response Fd 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 c� Total General Fund & Subfunds $ 20,415,379 $ 13,002,826 $ 3,286,573 $ (2,843,377 �, t c 0 *$8,067,160 of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,782,150 balance in Fund 012, represent the required 20% operating reserve. N N No N There are no interfund loans outstanding at this time. , 0 a a� 76 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW LL 21 0 BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES a , GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS 7/31 /2022 7/31 /2022 Q2 YTD c Fund Balance Cash Balance — m E t U General Fund & Subfunds $ 20,415,379 $ 13,002,826 $ 3,286,573 $ (2,843,377 r Q Special Revenue 28,626,946 27,616,390 3,713,230 10,248,224 Capital Projects 2,916,232 2,864,020 (1,252,457) (1,197,631 Total Governmental Funds $ 51,958,557 $ 43,483,236 $ 5,747,347 $ 6,207,216 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 33 Packet Pg. 47 7.2.a SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- SPECIAL REVENUE 7/31/2022 7/31/2022 Q2 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund $ 76,060 $ 76,560 $ 324 $ 885 111 - Street Fund 675,559 539,074 79,264 (275,606 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 3,227,073 2,367,211 309,484 988,626 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 684,586 688,048 5,634 35,707 �E 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 89,509 76,271 6,508 18,395 Q. 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 89,249 89,643 4,048 12,725 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 14,987 15,059 61 727 123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 114,436 110,369 7,973 18,464 .3 125 - Real Estate Tax2 4,134,739 4,181,051 96,203 81,324 c 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 * 4,136,892 4,087,004 502,714 823,554 ii 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 3,251,945 3,253,527 2,881,289 2,950,420 21 130- Cemetery Mai ntenance/Improve ment 279,233 280,642 11,419 13,027 136 - Parks Trust Fund 168,027 168,893 (1,822) (563 0 137- Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 1,131,625 1,137,322 9,134 24,549 N 138- Sister City Comm ission 18,093 18,173 2,498 2,613 N 140 -Business Improvement Disrict 59,052 59,052 (1,597) 29,920 >, 141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing I'd 191,791 184,398 1,253 32,377 142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 10,263,218 10,263,218 (201,157) 5,490,838 .. 143 -Tree Fund 20,873 20,873 - 241 0 Total Special Revenue $ 28,626,946 $ 27,616,390 $ 3,713,230 $ 10,248,224 aQi *$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $700,000 for the purchase of Open Space. 76 U c c� ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW LL O a 21 BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ENTERPRISE ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- y FUNDS 7/31/2022 7/31/2022 Q2 YTD E t Fund Balance Cash Balance U r r Q 421 -Water Utility Fund $ 30,921,503 $ 8,519,057 $ 556,701 $ 2,194,336 422 -Storm Utility Fund " 16,998,895 6,868,067 278,943 1,351,517 423-Sewer/WWTPUtility Fund 62,337,347 16,962,769 (560,785) 1,984,818 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 846,684 846,684 1,805 2,723 411 -Combined Utility Operation 93,080 146,238 35,770 93,080 Total Enterprise Funds $ 111,197,509 $ 33,342,815 $ 312,433 $ 5,626,474 *$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding. *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 34 Packet Pg. 48 7.2.a SUMMARY OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- CITY-WIDE 7/31/2022 7/31/2022 Q2 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance Governmental Funds $ 51,958,557 $ 43,483,236 $ 5,747,347 $ 6,207,216 Enterprise Funds 111,197,509 33,342,815 312,433 5,626,474 Internal Services Fund 10,487,070 6,062,471 210,841 199,518 Total City-wide Total $ 173,643,136 $ 82,888,522 $ 6,270,621 $ 12,033,208 0 Q. a� 76 U c c� INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW c LL 0 a N N O N BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 3 ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 7/31/2022 7/31/2022 Q2 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 76 511 - Equipment Rental Fund $ 9,504,801 $ 5,252,925 $ 124,919 $ 296,290 c M 512 -Technology Rental Fund 982,268 809,546 85,922 (96,772 Total Internal Service Funds $ 10,487,070 $ 6,062,471 $ 210,841 $ 199,518 21 t c 0 2 2, c m E U 0 r r a *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 35 Packet Pg. 49 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E090622 Special Packet Pg. 50 8.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER DRAFT MINUTES September 6, 2022 STAFF PRESENT Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council special meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. APPOINTMENT TO FILL COUNCIL POSITION 1 VACANCY City Clerk Scott Passey read the procedures to be followed: Nominntinns Each councilmember may nominate one candidate from the list of applicants by placing an "X" beside the name of the applicant of their choice on the form supplied by the city clerk and initialing the form. The city clerk will announce and maintain a permanent record of the nominations and the councilmember nominating each candidate. The F.lectinn Each councilmember may vote for one candidate by placing an "X" beside the name of the candidate of their choice on the ballot provided and numbering and initialing their ballots. The city clerk will announce and maintain a permanent record of each ballot and who voted for each candidate. A Deadlock A deadlock occurs after each councilmember votes the same way on three consecutive ballots. In the event the council should deadlock, previous nominations are declared null and void and the council may begin a new round of nominations. Appointment A candidate is successfully appointed upon receiving four affirmative votes. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 51 8.1.a Mr. Passey advised if councilmembers wish to speak regarding their nominations or the process, the appropriate time would be after the nomination ballots have been collected and he has indicated which councilmembers nominated which candidates. He thanked former Student Representative Brook Roberts for his assistance with collecting the forms. ROLL CALL Mr. Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. Mr. Passey advised councilmembers have a stack of nomination forms and ballot forms. He requested councilmembers complete Nomination #1. Nomination 1 Candidate Councilmember Michelle Dotsch Buckshnis Maria Montalvo Chen, L. Johnson, & Paine Dave Teitzel Tibbott Jenna Nand Olson Councilmember L. Johnson relayed she received a number of emails in support of applicants, every single one was for Maria Montalvo. The emails listed things like ability to navigate hard conversations, chairing numerous groups, very involved in her community, consistently prioritizes the underrepresented population of Edmonds, deeply committed to the health and wellbeing of Edmonds, choices represent inclusion and balanced thinking, analytical, open minded, forward thinking, gets things done, prepared for meetings. Based on what constitutes have been saying as well as the council's interviews, she nominated Maria Montalvo. Councilmember Tibbott relayed he nominated former Councilmember Dave Teitzel primarily because the council is about to enter into the budget season and he brings a great deal of experience with that process and will add a lot to the council's deliberations. He also looked at 2023 as a fairly intense year due to comprehensive planning and anticipated Mr. Teitzel, having been on the council previously, could draw on his former experience during that intense season. Council President Olson added to the nomination of Dave Teitzel, he is very experienced and has served the City well. With regard to her nomination of Jenna Nand, similar to Mr. Teitzel, she has spent most of life in Edmonds so has seen it through a child and young adult's eyes as well as through her parents' eyes. As a former council candidate and someone who has continued to be very involved in the City in the interim, her intellect, awareness, long term attendance, and law background would serve the council well. Councilmember Paine spoke to her nomination of Maria Montalvo, commenting she was impressed with her background and her work with groups in the community. She recalled Ms. Montalvo also spoke to how to reach a situation where everyone has some satisfaction with the outcome. She also talked about tradeoffs which equal compromise and she has done some very hard work on that. She was wowed by Ms. Montalvo's interview as well as during a subsequent conversation. She understands the dynamics of how government works, watersheds, and big projects in the City. She would be a terrific addition to the council and knows how to make things happen and make them happen swiftly. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked everyone who applied, commenting all the candidates are equally qualified and have different and unique skills. She hoped all the candidates will choose to run in the next election; there will be five seats available on the council. If anyone needs help, she has done many campaigns. She received numerous emails and telephone calls. She was particularly interested in what the late Councilmember K. Johnson brought to the table, her understanding of planning, zoning and the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 52 8.1.a environmental which is why chose to nominate Michelle Dotsch who has been a watchdog on the zoning process for a very long time. She knows Dr. Dotsch personally and believed she would do a great job. She mirrored Councilmember Tibbott's comments about Dave Teitzel; he was a very good friend of Kristiana Johnson and helped her a lot and would be very happy if he took on this short term commitment of 14-15 months to help bridge the gap until a councilmember is elected. Councilmember Chen thanked all the candidates who applied, relaying his respect for each of them and recognizing they each bring a unique skill set and qualifications to the table. He nominated Maria Montalvo because he received many emails and calls in support of her, but he also has personal experience working with her on projects that helped the Chamber through difficult times and saw her dedication and commitment to the community. He was looking for someone who can bring the community together and work through the issues facing the City. He acknowledged many of the candidates would do the same, but the community's support was the reason he nominated Ms. Montalvo. Candidate Votes Councilmember Ballot 1 Maria Montalvo 4 Chen, Paine, L. Johnson Michelle Dotsch 1 Buckshnis Dave Teitzel 1 Tibbott & Olson Ballot 2 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 3 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 4 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson The Council vote reached a deadlock. Mr. Passey requested councilmembers complete Nomination #2 Nomination 2 Candidate Councilmember Dave Teitzel Olson & Buckshnis Maria Montalvo Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Michelle Dotsch Tibbott Candidate Votes Councilmember Ballot 5 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 6 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 7 Michelle Dotsch 1 Tibbott Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 2 Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 8 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine, & L. Johnson Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 53 8.1.a Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 9 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 10 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson The Council vote reached a deadlock. Mr. Passey requested councilmembers complete Nomination #3. Nomination 3 Candidate Councilmember Roger Pence Olson & Tibbott Jenna Nand Chen Dave Teitzel Buckshnis Maria Montalvo L. Johnson & Paine Councilmember Paine spoke regarding her nominee Maria Montalvo. This position was unfortunately vacated due to loss of friend and colleague Kristiana Johnson. Maria Montalvo has the exact same educational background as Kristiana Johnson, bachelor and master's degrees; Kristiana Johnson's degrees were in planning and Maria Montalvo's are in economics and political science. They also share the same love of Edmonds. Nominating and balloting for Maria Montalvo will also support the memory of Kristiana Johnson and add a lot of the get up and go that Maria Montalvo brings which is why she continued her nomination of Maria Montalvo. Councilmember Tibbott spoke to his nomination of Roger Pence, explaining he brings a great deal of experience having been on the Planning Board and several other community involvements and could step into the council position ready to serve. He also appreciated his background in communication. He has expressed his willingness to run for office in 2023 but is also a veteran of running campaigns and will do a good job as a candidate running for office. Councilmember Buckshnis said former Councilmember Teitzel knows how to step into the big shoes left by Kristiana Johnson. She was an independent and so is he; they are both strong willed in terms of ethics and are independent thinkers. Dave Teitzel has proven himself; he served on the long range financial planning committee with Kristiana Johnson for 18 months which resulted in the development of the fund balance policy which was necessary for the City's AAA rating. He is very conservative about maintaining downtown and has a proven track record. She expressed support for him as he will be great for the finance team, is a great policy wonk, and selecting him will respect who Kristiana Johnson might have picked had she retired. She concluded the best candidate for the late Councilmember K. Johnson's seat is Dave Teitzel. Council President Olson agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis' sentiments, relaying she knew firsthand that the late Councilmember K. Johnson respected Mr. Teitzel as a colleague when he was on council. She nominated Roger Pence who is at everything and has a passion for city government. She anticipated he could get up to speed quickly, almost as fast as someone who had already been on the council. Councilmember Chen spoke to his nomination of Jenna Nand; he has known her for the last 3-4 years, she is very dedicated, involved, has a heart for the City of Edmonds, ran for council, applied for appointment and has been at council meetings focusing her energy on City matters. She is an attorney and her skills sets will complement the council. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 54 8.1.a Candidate Votes Councilmember Ballot 11 Jenna Nand 1 Chen Roger Pence 1 Tibbott Dave Teitzel 2 Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 2 Paine & L. Johnson Ballot 12 Maria Montalvo 2 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 13 Roger Pence 1 Chen Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 2 Paine & L. Johnson Ballot 14 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 15 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Roger Pence 1 Tibbott Dave Teitzel 2 Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 16 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis &Olson Ballot 17 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 18 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson The Council vote reached a deadlock. Mr. Passey requested councilmembers complete Nomination #4 Nomination 4 Candidate Councilmember Natalie Seitz Olson, Chen & Paine Dave Teitzel Buckshnis Maria Montalvo L. Johnson Erika Barnett Tibbott Councilmember Tibbott explained he nominated Erika Barnett and even though she did not have an interview, he interviewed her individually before she left on vacation. She is an independent thinker in Edmonds, gets along with a lot of people, professionally she works collaboratively with a variety of people in the business world, and is also very well connected in the community. He concluded those were the characteristics he was looking for in a councilmember. Councilmember L. Johnson spoke to her nomination of Maria Montalvo; in reviewing the comments she received from citizens, two stook out: constantly prioritizes the under -represented population of Edmonds and her choices represent inclusion and balanced thinking. Historically, the Edmonds City Council has not been very diverse; Maria Montalvo would not only prioritize, speak for and represent a more diverse Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 55 8.1.a community, but she also comes from that community. She is proven and numerous citizens sent emails speaking to that which is she nominated Maria Montalvo. Councilmember Paine explained she nominated Natalie Seitz because she is a regular speaker at council meetings, understands how the comprehensive plan flows into work plans and other planning documents and technical details. She is also very familiar with watersheds and stormwater which is crucial in Edmonds as well as applying the policy and understanding the operations. She has a lot of confidence in Ms. Seitz' ability to include other aspects of policy work the council does which includes adding equity across the City and across different groups and putting it together in a comprehensive manner. She will be a good fit for the City and helps address the imbalance of resources spread across the City. For those reasons, she was proud to nominate Natalie Seitz. Council President Olson said she has learned a lot from Natalie Seitz being part of the process during the last year. She is very smart, knowledgeable and her day job segues well into what the council does. She agreed with Councilmember Tibbott's nomination and said she was also impressed talking with Erika Barnett and there was no doubt that Maria Montalvo was a great Edmonds citizen. If former Councilmember Teitzel had not been one of the candidates, this decision would have been devastatingly hard. She will continue to hope to get one of the best councilmembers back to participate in the very challenging year ahead. Councilmember Buckshnis said she also enjoyed her conversations with Natalie Seitz and Erika Barnett. Dave Teitzel has had four years of understanding of complex and detailed matters and previously brought forward Job Order Contracting for minorities in the council's policy discussions. He will bring that diversity and knowledge of diversity. It is important to respect what the late Councilmember K. Johnson brought to the table. Last year's budget process was a mess and needs to be fixed this year. It would be very advantageous for the financial individuals on the team to have Dave Teitzel as a councilmember. Councilmember Chen said he nominated Natalie Seitz because he learned a lot from her expertise in public works, an aspects that can help the council deal with massive undertakings that are ahead including many big projects as well as a new public works director. Having someone that is strong in that area would help the council which is why he nominated Natalie Seitz. Candidate Votes Councilmember Ballot 19 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & Paine Erika Barnett 1 Tibbott Dave Teitzel 2 Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 L. Johnson Ballot 20 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Ballot 21 Erika Barnett 1 Chen Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Natalie Seitz 1 L. Johnson Ballot 22 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & Paine Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 L. Johnson Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 56 8.1.a Ballot 23 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Ballot 24 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Ballot 25 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 2 Tibbott & Buckshnis Erika Barnett 1 Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Ballot 26 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & Paine Erika Barnett 1 Tibbott Dave Teitzel 2 Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 L. Johnson Ballot 27 Natalie Seitz 2 Chen & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Ballot 28 Erika Barnett 1 Chen Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Natalie Seitz 1 Paine Maria Montalvo 1 L. Johnson Ballot 29 Erika Barnett 2 Chen & Tibbott Dave Teitzel 2 Buckshnis & Olson Natalie Seitz 1 Paine Maria Montalvo 1 L. Johnson Ballot 30 Maria Montalvo 2 Chen & Paine Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Natalie Seitz 1 L. Johnson Ballot 31 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 32 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 33 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson The Council vote reached a deadlock. Mr. Passey advised councilmembers could complete Nomination #5 or could adjourn this meeting and take this up at the regular meeting. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 57 8.1.a Councilmember Paine expressed support for adjourning and take this up at the regular meeting when the council was done with its regular business. Council President Olson relayed it was the council's consensus they were ready for a break. 2. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE FOR COUNCIL POSITION #1 3. ORDINANCE REVISING CHAPTER 2.05 ECC; CITY ATTORNEY CODE UPDATE 3. ADJOURN COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The council meeting was adjourned at 6:53 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 58 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of Council Regular Meeting Minutes of September 6, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E090622 Packet Pg. 59 8.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES September 6, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember (seated at 9:00 p.m.) 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., & Cultural Serv. Dir. Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Kris Reintegrado, A/V Technician The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Chen read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 4. PRESENTATIONS 1. RESOLUTION HONORING COUNCILMEMBER KRISTIANA JOHNSON Council President Olson read a resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, honoring Councilmember Kristiana Johnson for her service to the Edmonds City Council. She was honored to have Kristian Johnson's sister, Janette Johnson, present to receive these accolades on behalf of the family. Janette Johnson thanked the council for the resolution, a wonderful tribute to Kristiana. Her passion for the City of Edmonds, service and leadership were profound. On behalf of the family, she thanked the council for this wonderful tribute. 2. NATIONAL SUICIDE PREVENTION AWARENESS MONTH Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 60 Q 8.2.a Mayor Nelson read a proclamation proclaiming the month of September 2022 as Suicide Prevention Awareness Month in the City of Edmonds. 3. SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT 2022 SUICIDE PREVENTION REPORT Wendy Burchill, Healthy Communities Specialist & Child Death Review Coordinator, Snohomish Health District, explained through her work with Child Death Review, recommendations are made about prevention of future deaths of youth by focusing on modifiable risk factors, one of which is youth suicide prevention. A lot of the information she will share is applicable to all ages, not just youth. She reviewed: • Adult Suicide Rates by Age Group, Snohomish County 35 29 30 25 g d 20 0 a 15 K 10 5 0 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 wAge 20 to 24 Age 25 to 34 Age 35 to 44 Age 4S to 64 Age 65+ • Youth (age 0-17) Suicide Rates, Snohomish County and Washington State 16 IS 14 12 10 0 0 a fi 4 2 l 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2010 2019 2020 —Snahamish Coenty �Wwhingtan State Youth Suicide in our Community o Zero Suicide Discussion ■ In 2020 there were no youth (age 0-17) suicides in Snohomish County. This was the first time in nearly 20 years where there were zero youth suicides in a 12-month period. ■ Protective Factors - Sleep - More family time/interaction (and pets!) - Less juggling of commitments, not overextended - Less bullying Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 61 N N W 0 0 W r E c.i Q 8.2.a - More flexibility in terms of schedule and an opportunity to take ownership of when and where schoolwork is completed - Less academic pressure - testing, deadlines - Less distraction and chatter (esp for ADD/HD, anxiety students) - Supervision Risk Factors (in addition to the traditional suicide risk factors) - Unpredictability of the future - days, weeks, months, years - increases anxiety - Lack of coping strategies - Youth who have become disengaged from school - When home is not a safe space - creating trauma that may lead to mental health crisis or suicide attempt(s) - Increased access to firearms Suicide Clues and Warning Signs o The more clues and signs observed, the greater the risk. o Take all signs seriously. o Direct Clues ■ "I'm going to kill myself." ■ "I wish I were dead." ■ "I'm going to commit suicide." ■ "I'm going to end it all." ■ "If (such and such) doesn't happen, I'll kill myself." o Indirect Clues ■ "I'm tired of life, I just can't go on." ■ "My family would be better off without me." ■ "Who cares if I'm dead anyway." ■ "I just want out." ■ "I won't be around much longer." ■ "Pretty soon you won't have to worry about me." o Behavioral Clues ■ Any previous suicide attempt o ■ Acquiring a gun or stockpiling pills ■ Putting personal affairs in order ° ■ Giving away prized possessions a ■ Sudden interest or disinterest in religion ■ Co-occurring depression, moodiness, hopelessness N ■ Drug or alcohol abuse, or relapse after a period of recovery o ■ Unexplained anger, aggression and irritability w o Situational Clues r ■ Being fired or being expelled/suspended from school ■ A recent unwanted move E ■ Loss of any major relationship ■ Death of a spouse, child, or best friend, especially if by suicide a ■ Sudden unexpected loss of freedom/fear of punishment ■ Fear of becoming a burden to others How to Help Someone in Crisis o Listen to the problem and give them your full attention o Do not rush to judgment o Offer hope in any form. "You matter!" o Get others involved. Ask the person who else might help. Family? Friends? Brothers? Sisters? Clergy? Physician? Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 62 8.2.a o Follow up with a visit, a text or a card, or in whatever way feels comfortable to you. Let the person know you care about what happens to them. • What We Know o Suicide is complex. There are almost always multiple causes, including mental illnesses and childhood trauma, that may not have been recognized or treated. Death by suicide is rarely caused by a single event, such as a recent job loss, divorce, bullying, or bad grades. o Mental disorders and/or substance abuse have been found in 90 percent of people who have died by suicide. o Suicide is a response to intense, emotional pain that results in feelings of hopelessness and of burdensomeness. o Depression, anxiety, and suicidal crises are livable and survived by most who get help. o The majority of people who survive suicide attempts report that they did not want to die, instead they did not believe there was any other way to end their pain. o Safe firearm storage saves lives. An adolescent's risk of suicide increases nearly fourfold if they live in homes with a firearm compared to those living in homes with no firearm. • How the Community Can Help o Take and/or offer trainings like Mental Health First Aid, QPR or Talk Saves Lives o Partner with area mental health providers and crisis resources to keep the conversation about suicide in the forefront o Utilize social media platforms to accurately relay hopeful survivor stories and resources o Be the source for timely and accurate data about suicide in your community o Provide crisis line information and mental health resources to clients, community members and/or students via flyers, posters, cards, and on student IDs • Why Talk About Suicide? o Discussing suicide (in person or in the media) carefully and appropriately, can ■ Change public misperceptions ■ Correct myths ■ Reduce stigma ■ Encourage those who are vulnerable or at risk to seek help. ■ PREVENT future suicides • Snohomish County Youth Suicide Prevention Task Force o Enhances community coordination, identifies service gaps to help leverage resources, provides technical assistance and training, and identifies policy gaps all regarding youth suicide and prevention. o https://snocochildrenswellnesscoalition.com/index.php/suicide-prevention-task-force/ • Crisis Resources in Snohomish County 0 24/7 consultation with professional staff o Urgent appointments o Mobile outreach ➢ 800-584-3578 ➢ Crisis Chat: www.imhurting.org • 988 — 24/7 Crisis & Support o Simply calling or texting 988 or chatting at 988Lifeline.org will connect you to compassionate care and support for mental health -related distress. • Suicide Resources o American Foundation for Suicide Prevention - www.afsp.org o National Alliance on Mental Illness - www.nami.org o Suicide Prevention Resource Center - www.sprc.org o The Trevor Project - www.thetrevorproject.org o Mental Health First Aid - www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org • Veteran Suicide Resources Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 63 N N W 0 rn 0 w c as E ca a o US Dept of Veteran Affairs REACH and Mental Health Resources - www.va.gov/REACH and www.mentalhealth.va.gov o Wounded Warrior Project - www.woudedwarriorproject.org o NAMI: Veterans and Active Duty - www.nami.org/Your-JoumeyNeterans-Active-Duty o Stop Veteran Suicide - www.stopveteransuicide.org Native American Suicide Resources o The Washington Indian Behavioral Health HUB exists as a central resource point for those affiliated with the Native American and Alaskan Native Communities. We are available statewide to assist in a variety of ways, giving special attention to culture and community connection. ■ 1-866-491-1683 ■ Native text line. Text NATIVE to 97779 Suicide Loss Survivor Resources o American Foundation for Suicide Prevention - www.afsp.org o National Alliance on Mental Illness - www.nami.org o Friends for Survival - https:Hfriendsforsurvival.org/ o Crisis Connections - https://www.crisisconnections.org/support-after-suicide/ o Bereaved Parents of the USA - https://www.bereavedparentsusa.org/ o Survivors of Suicide Support Group - bereavement@swedish.org and www.swedish.org/classes-and-resources/bereavement-support Councilmember Paine commented was glad Ms. Burchill was back to make a presentation again this year. She was most impressed by having the risk factors identified and talked about. She was glad youth a suicide decreased to zero in 2020 and hoped that trend would continue. She asked how to best monitor r and be active in the community such as will the presentation be made to schools or in other places where young people are as well as community events in Edmonds and in the region, noting the importance of L everyone having this information. Many have been touched by suicide in their personal lives and knowing what can be done and that it is totally preventable is important. Ms. Burchill suggested one of the best ways to get actively involved is the task force which is community wide. There are several people from the Edmonds School on the task force. In the past suicide prevention was only a small portion of her work c at the health district; with the formation of the task force, she feels there is a community -wide effort > assisting her. She also suggested checking in more often with youth, veterans and the elderly, even if it is n just a text. Even if a person does not tell them they matter or ask if they are thinking of suicide, showing a they care and are thinking of them gives them a sense of value and that they have a place. N N Councilmember L. Johnson commented the presentation was very informative and every time she hears the presentation, something new stands out to her. She referred to the change in the number of youth w suicide in 2020 and the indication that the trend in Snohomish County is not necessarily the same nationwide. She expressed interest in knowing more about that; whether Snohomish County was an anomaly, whether something was different or what happened. As a parent of teens during this time, she E saw how some of the things like more sleep, less juggling of commitments benefited their health overall. She was interested in seeing what could be done with the information related to suicide prevention but a also for the continuum; if it reduced suicide, it resulted in youth who are less stressed, have less anxiety, etc. She asked how that information could be used going forward. Councilmember L. Johnson referred to the comment that the number one cause of suicide is untreated depression and that depression is an illness. She noted illnesses are treated and talked about, but for many, talking about suicide and mental health comes with a stigma. It is important to talk about and treat depression until it becomes something normal to talk about with family and friends. She reiterated safe firearm storage saves lives. Edmonds has done its part to try to address this head on. She highlighted the statistic of four times the risk of suicide for youth who live in a home with guns. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 64 8.2.a Ms. Burchill advised 2020 was an anomaly; 5 youth in Snohomish County were lost to suicide in 2021, but she hoped to see zero suicides again. Looking at the protective factors during COVID provide tools. Many on the task force have kids and agreed it did not mean they weren't struggling with mental health because those were stressful times for everyone, but what specifically was happening that made it different? Taking that information to the next level is something they are talking about. The zero suicide was the springboard for creating the task force, getting into schools, looking at their policies, looking at what they offer in terms of support, etc. are things that are being looked at more closely. Councilmember L. Johnson liked the term protective factors, even before the pandemic, parents heard how important sleep and family time are, but COVID gave an opportunity to see it. Labeling them as protective factors is key because not only is it good for youth, but it is protective. Ms. Burchill agreed, noting there is a lot of data to back up the issue of sleep. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO ADD 9.1, A RESOLUTION TO CELEBRATE HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH FROM SEPTEMBER 15 TO OCTOBER 15. Councilmember L. Johnson expressed her appreciation to Councilmember Chen for bringing this forward. She looked forward to an opportunity to learn more through this resolution. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO AMEND THE AGENDA AS FOLLOWS: ITEM 9.2, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT; ITEM 9.3, 96TH AVE o STORMWATER/CIVIC PARK MITIGATION PROJECT FUNDING; ITEM 9.4, COUNCILMEMBER APPOINTMENT PROCESS; ITEM 9.5, ORDINANCE REVISING o CHAPTER 2.05 ECC; AND REMOVING REVISIT PERMANENT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR a MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE WHICH IS NOT A STATUTORY Q REQUIREMENT BUT AN EXTRA TOUCH BEFORE NEXT WEEK'S PUBLIC HEARING. N N t0 Councilmember Paine pointed out next week is committee meetings. Council President Olson clarified o she meant the September 20t' meeting. w r c Councilmember Buckshnis commented it would be more appropriate to move the council appointment process up on the agenda as Item 9.3 is not time sensitive. Council President Olson advised it was time sensitive. Q AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described procedures for in -person audience comments. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 65 8.2.a Carl Zapora, Edmonds, thanked councilmembers and City staff who organized and attended the memorial for Kristiana Johnson, a beautiful tribute to a great councilmember. He also appreciated the council honoring her this evening. With regard to appointing someone to replace the Kristiana Johnson for the rest of her term, there is a lot of work to be done. September -December entail a huge amount of work to put together the City's budget. Every councilmember he knows have said it is a very big learning curve and they do not get up to speed in a few months, it is often 5-9 months before they grasp everything going on in the City, the complexities, legal issues, budget matters, etc. With that in mind, there are a lot of great people who have applied for appointment to the city council and he applauded them for their interest in the City. As it relates to being up to speed as quickly as possible during this important time for the City, there is one applicant who has what it takes and can serve as a full city councilmember on day one, former Councilmember Dave Teitzel. He encouraged the council to seriously consider Dave Teitzel; he is experienced and well respected by all councilmembers. N N Mayor Nelson described procedures for virtual audience comments. N co Ken Reidy, Edmonds, read from the State Attorney General, the Open Public Meetings Act establishes procedures for a governing body to adjourn a regular or special meeting and continue that meeting to a E time and place identified in an order of adjournment, RCW 42.30.090. Less than a quorum of a governing n body may adjourn and continue a meeting under these procedures or the clerk or secretary of the body Cn may do so if no members are present. Notice of the meeting adjournment must be the same that is required for special meetings in RCW 42.30.080 and a copy of the order or notice of adjournment must 3 r be posted on or near the door of the place where the meeting was held. He asked whether the council was allowed to adjourn tonight's special meeting and then continue it as part of the regular meeting for two a items, Council Appointment for the Vacancy and Review of City Attorney Code, Chapter 2.05. Next, he = r encouraged the city council to form a citizen task force to review the historical conduct of city attorneys and recommend how the City should obtain and manage legal advice. This task force can also help with L the update of chapter 2.05 ECC. a Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Edmonds, said although she appreciated Mr. Teitzel's ability to communicate with others, she reminded that he, Councilmember Tibbott and former Councilmember o Mesaros were the last councilmembers censured by Councilmember K. Johnson regarding the freeway offramp onto the beach where there was a 4-3 vote and those three councilmembers went to the o Department of Ecology to more or less complain about what the council did and indicate their support for a the offramp to the beach. Mr. Teitzel also supported decreasing the buffer in the marsh to a level that a would not have protected it from parking, oil, gasoline, and vehicle emissions. If the council was N interested in supporting the environment, supporting someone who wanted a huge structure going to the o beach and creating a smaller buffer for the marsh was probably not the best idea. She wished the council w luck in making this decision, recalling her involvement in multiple council appointments. She r summarized the council needs to base their appointment decision on who can do a good job all around for the council, not just those who will support the votes of the minority or the majority whichever the case E may be. a Dee [no last name given], commented it may not be beneficial to Edmonds to appoint Maria Montalvo to the city council as she is Strom Peterson's wife and tied to a democratic party position. Councilmembers are supposed to be non -partisan and she did not feel good about the council appointing her. She encouraged the council to look carefully at all the candidates' backgrounds and ensure they are putting Edmonds first and before big city politics. 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM STEVEN NOBLE Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 66 2. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. Councilmember Buckshnis requested Items 8.1 and 8.2 be removed from the Consent Agenda to allow her to abstain from the vote. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 27, 2022 4. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 29, 2022 5. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 6. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS 7. ARTS & CULTURAL SERVICES PROGRAM MANAGER JOB DESCRIPTION REVISION 8. CULTURAL ARTS PROGRAM SPECIALIST JOB DESCRIPTION REVISION 9. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEMBER REVISION 10. RESOLUTION HONORING COUNCILMEMBER KRISTIANA JOHNSON 11. MARCHIS V. CITY OF EDMONDS CONFLICT WAIVER ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 23, 2022 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 23, 2022 N N t0 Councilmember Buckshnis said she was out of country for the August 23, 2022 meetings so she will abstain from the vote. c w r COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 23, 2022 AND COUNCIL t REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 23, 2022. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING. Q 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. RESOLUTION TO CELEBRATE HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH Councilmember Chen read a proclamation proclaiming September 15 - October 15 as Hispanic Heritage Month. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 67 8.2.a COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 1503, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON CELEBRATING HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DIRECTOR APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson summarized Oscar Antillon's background, advising the council has previously seen his application materials and the employment contract is included in the packet. Mr. Antillon has over 20 years' experience in public works, serving in a variety of increasingly responsible positions. His background includes municipal public works director positions as well as program management for NASA. He is a veteran of the U.S. Navy and holds an MS in information science and technology management as well as a BS in civil engineering and is a registered professional engineer. He brings a strong background in budgeting and project management and in his tenure with the Navy, led the largest construction project in the Navy inventory. He has extensive experience in leadership and personnel management, facilities management, as well as energy efficiency and green construction. Councilmember Tibbott commented when he reviewed Mr. Antillon's resume, one of his concerns was the short tenures in the cities he worked for. He asked what led him to move from one city to another so rapidly. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered that has been discussed with Mr. Antillon, mostly focused on his commitment to being with the City of Edmonds. Of course, when an employee is hired, they cannot be tied to a length of employment. In her discussions with him, he is committed to a long tenure with Edmonds and is moving his family here and plans to live and stay in Edmonds a while. Councilmember Tibbott asked how many people applied for the position and how many were offered the position. Ms. Neill Hoyson recalled there were 18 applicants and 2 people were offered the position. Council President Olson shared things that excited her with regard to why this candidate will be a great fit for Edmonds and hopefully with that great fit, he will be compelled to stay for a long time. One of the things that resonated with her was he mentioned attending board and commission meetings in other communities he was in and getting to know the community members who participate. People in Edmonds will appreciate having that person sitting next to them learning and listening. She felt he was without ego in that way and would take all the good input from the community. She was excited about this candidate and thanked Mayor Nelson for bringing the appointment forward for council confirmation. N Councilmember Buckshnis relayed a question from a citizen regarding the $8,000 traveling expense for a previous director. This director will be traveling much further but was only paid $8,000 for moving c expenses. She asked if the $8,000 provided to the prior director established a precedent. Ms. Neill Hoyson w answered council previously approved that amount so the mayor felt comfortable forwarding that proposal for council consideration. E Councilmember Buckshnis said she was excited to get Mr. Antillon on board as the City has been without f° a public works director for a long time and there are many important projects on the horizon. a COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO CONFIRM THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF OSCAR ANTILLON TO THE PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DIRECTOR POSITION EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2022 ALONG WITH APPROVAL OF THE CORRESPONDING EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT VOTING NO. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 68 Mr. Antillon thanked FIR staff for guiding him through the process. He was honored to be appointed to this important role and looked forward to working with the team, delivering services the community expects, and learning from citizens and partners that make public works possible. 3. 96TH AVE STORMWATER/CIVIC PARK MITIGATION PROJECT FUNDING Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Services Director Angie Feser explained this agenda item was to request the allocation of ARPA funds for a stormwater mitigation project related to Civic Park. This project has been part of Civic Park for quite some time. As demonstrated in a presentation to council committee last month, there are issues with funding allocation and cost overruns on the Civic project. One option to assist with that situation is to use ARPA funds for the stormwater project. The stormwater mitigation is required for the Civic Park project because the park site has a very high water table, there is more than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface and all the stormwater cannot be treated onsite. The project can be mitigated by creating a stormwater treatment infiltration project within the same watershed. She reviewed: Early design o Stormwater Mitigation — Yost Park ■ Many locations ■ Tree impacts ■ Loss of parking spaces ■ Loss of pool spectator area ■ Pool operations impact ■ In-house construction Alternative design o Stormwater Mitigation — 96' Ave Right -of -Way ■ Due to groundwater limiting stormwater detention at Civic Park, this project will detain stormwater through infiltration within the same Shell Creek Watershed ■ Less impactful to the park and more efficient ■ Still meets the requirements of the permitting for Civic Park ■ Council authorization for contract award later this year ■ Getting ready to go to bid but need to identify funding source first ■ Proposing to use one-time ARPA funds for this project instead of REET or parks related funds • Project expenses through 6/30/22 (Construction completion 57%) Expenditures %to Anticipated Anticipated Projected Expenditures Estimate to date date Expenditures % Construction (6130122) $ 11,933,162 $ 7,026,883 59% $ 11,785,297 99% Construction Contract Sales Tax (10A%) ' Owner Furnished Amenities Management Reserve (12%) Construction Support $ 1,476,463 $ 819,660 56% $ 1,543,210 105% W alker Macy Construction Support KBA Construction Support City Engineering Staff Time + Testing Construction Preparation $ 108,926 $ 52,225 48% $ 104,477 96% Permits City Engineering Staff (Design & Permit) Stormwater Mitigation (96th Ave ROW) $ 200,600 $ - D% $ 431,620 215% 1%Art Donation $ 61,002 $ 61,002 100% $ 61,002 100% Total Project S 13,757,283 $ 7,959,770 58% S 13,925,596 101 % S (168,313) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 69 N N CD O O O LLI r C N t V rC Q 8.2.a Ms. Feser summarized the cost of the stormwater mitigation was originally $200,000 when the project was to be done in-house and is now estimated at $430,000 due to the technical nature and the requirement for a contractor. With that addition and the shortfall in funding from Snohomish County, here is an estimated deficit of $313,000. Options for funding are BEET, Park bond funds, the General Fund, or ARPA funds. This is a standalone project that has not gone out to bid yet and qualifies as a green infrastructure and stormwater project. She requested the council considering funding this project with ARPA funds. A decision is needed soon as the bid documents need to contain this information because the contractor needs to be aware of the different requirements when ARPA funds are used. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Ms. Feser for the explanatory email she sent her today. She recalled the original mitigation was to be done by park maintenance staff but now the project footprint will be smaller and the cost will be increased. Due to technical difficulties with Ms. Feser's internet connection, Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. Councilmember Buckshnis observed there was a 215% or $431,620 increase, but the project footprint was smaller. She asked why the price was increasing, whether it was simply because it was being contracted out. Ms. Feser explained the original project was to be done with in-house labor. This project is a different approach, requiring digging a very deep hole and installation of an inground infiltration system which in-house staff is not technically capable of doing so it has to be contracted out. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the additional cost was $450,000. Ms. Feser said the allocation she is requesting is up to $450,000. Councilmember Buckshnis observed that will reduce the BEET allocation. Ms. Feser agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why stormwater was not paying any of this and if it was because it was mitigation for Civic Park. Ms. Feser answered stormwater funds were never allocated as part of the Civic Park project and when funds were originally allocated for Civic, ARPA funds did not exist as they were the result of COVID. The Civic Park project included this mitigation project and it was covered by funds allocated for the Civic Park project and did not include any stormwater funds. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there would still a $313,000 shortfall if $450,000 in ARPA funds were allocated. Ms. Feser answered no, the shortfall will be covered by the ARPA funding. Councilmember Paine asked the timeline to complete the mitigation project. Ms. Feser answered if the council approves the allocation tonight, she was hopeful the work could be completed in the December- N February timeframe. Councilmember Paine asked if the council approves the allocation, will there be an o ordinance provided for approval at the next council meeting. [Ms. Feser's internet connection was lost.] w r COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AUTHORIZE THE ALLOCATION OF UP TO $450,000 OF ARPA FUNDING TO CONSTRUCT E THE 96TH AVENUE STORMWATER MITIGATION PROJECT AS REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETION OF CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELDS PARK PROJECT Q Councilmember L. Johnson asked if there was anything that could be reduced or removed from the project instead of going over budget. This started as an expensive project and is getting more expensive and she was certain the funds could be used for other worthwhile things. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON ABSTAINING. Due to time constraints and because an executive session needs to be held tonight, Council President Olson made the following motion: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 70 8.2.a COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO MOVE THE EXECUTIVE SESSION TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. Council President Olson commented the executive session is time critical and needs to happen tonight. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the executive session is scheduled for 60 minutes. She suggested trying to appoint a councilmember to the vacancy for the next 25 minutes. Council President Olson said she planned to make another motion to continue the meeting to tomorrow evening to consider the remaining items. Councilmember L. Johnson understood the council may need to meet on another night, but as it is 8:30 p.m., she suggested working on the appointment for another hour and then holding the executive session. Council President Olson suggested if the council wanted to delay the start time of the executive session by %2 to 1 hour followed by a 1 hour executive session, asking staff who were here for the executive session what time they get up in the morning, noting they may not be at their peak to make a presentation at the executive session in another hour. Councilmember Paine asked if the planning board was scheduled in council chambers tomorrow evening. Mr. Passey said he would need to check the calendar. Councilmember L. Johnson suggested holding the executive session first and then the other agenda items. In addition to asking staff about the late hour, she wondered about them giving up another evening if the council could complete this work tonight. Council President Olson preferred to come back after the executive session if that was what the rest of the council wanted to do. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with continuing to work on the appointment of a councilmember until 9 p.m. and then convene the executive session. She did not want citizens waiting in the audience for the next agenda items while the council was in executive session. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (1-5), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. N Council President Olson advised the former Student Representative was no longer present and asked if o there was anyone in the audience who would assist the city clerk with picking up nomination and ballot c forms. A/V Technician Kris Reintegrado offered to assist. w r c 4. APPOINTMENT TO FILL COUNCIL POSITION 1 VACANCY t City Clerk Scott Passey relayed the council would continue where they left off at the conclusion of the special meeting where ballot 33 was a deadlock. He requested Councilmembers complete Nomination #5. a Nomination 5 Candidate Councilmember Natalie Seitz L. Johnson Dave Teitzel Olson, Tibbott & Buckshnis Roger Pence Chen Maria Montalvo Paine Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 71 Councilmember Tibbott spoke to his nomination again, partially due to the misinformation provided during Audience Comments. He assured the three councilmembers mentioned were not censured for anything. The comments provided were confusing with regard to whether they were related to the marsh or the connector. None of the information was accurate and it was rather confusing. Instead of listening to the misinformation, he suggested focusing on Mr. Teitzel's community involvement. As a councilmember, he was involved with the community task force that gathered input on Civic Park, he has served on the Historic Preservation Commission, served on Historic Preservation Commission, currently assists with organizing the summer market, and as a private citizen is very involved with delivering food to needy families in the community. During his previous campaign for council, he doorbelled over 6,000 homes in the community, working hard to connect with people in every neighborhood in the City and even lost 15 pounds walking around the city. Councilmember Tibbott summarized in addition to the previous comment he made about him, Mr. Teitzel is very well connected with people in the City and will represent the City well. Councilmember Paine spoke on behalf of her nomination of Maria Montalvo, relaying if she were elevated to city council, as a person of color, she would also represent one of the more diverse aspect of the community. She has been actively involved in the food bank, charitable and veterans organizations, and education foundations at Edmonds College and elsewhere in south Snohomish County and likes to get things done. She encouraged councilmembers to consider supporting Maria Montalvo's nomination to the city council. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the late Councilmember K. Johnson had big shoes to fill. She was an independent, was very thoughtful and did not censure anyone. When she was council president in 2016, Ann Macfarlane was invited to provide the council an update on parliamentary procedures because three councilmembers wrote a minority letter to Ecology, but there was no censure. She recalled when the late Councilmember Peggy Olson died, she was selected on the first ballot. She did not understand why the council was not considering who the person selected would be representing; Kristiana Johnson was a very kind, independent, and thoughtful person, and a watchdog for budgets and planning and Dave Teitzel is the right person to fill her shoes. Candidate Votes Councilmember Ballot 34 Roger Pence 1 Chen Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Natalie Seitz 1 L. Johnson Ballot 35 Maria Montalvo 2 Chen & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Natalie Seitz 1 Paine Ballot 36 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 37 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Ballot 38 Maria Montalvo 3 Chen, Paine & L. Johnson Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis &Olson a The Council vote reached a deadlock. Mr. Passey requested councilmembers complete Nomination #6. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 72 8.2.a Nomination 6 Candidate Councilmember Maria Montalvo L. Johnson & Paine Jenna Nand Tibbott Dave Teitzel Olson & Buckshnis Natalie Seitz Chen Candidate Votes Councilmember Ballot 39 Natalie Seitz 1 Chen Jenna Nand 2 Tibbott & Paine Dave Teitzel 2 Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 L. Johnson Ballot 40 Jenna Nand 1 Chen Dave Teitzel 3 Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 1 Paine Natalie Seitz 1 L. Johnson Ballot 41 Dave Teitzel 4 Chen, Tibbott, Buckshnis & Olson Maria Montalvo 3 Paine & L. Johnson Mr. Passey announced Dave Teitzel is appointed to vacant council seat #1. 5. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE FOR COUNCIL POSITION #1 Mayor Nelson swore in Dave Teitzel to council position #1. Councilmember Teitzel took his seat on the dais at 9:00 p.m. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO Q REMOVE ORDINANCE REVISING CHAPTER 2.05 ECC; CITY ATTORNEY CODE UPDATE N FROM THE AGENDA. MOTION CARIED UNANIMOUSLY. W 0 rn 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS w r c Mayor Nelson congratulated Councilmember Teitzel on his appointment to the council. He announced an event hosted by the Multicultural Association of Edmonds on Friday, September 9t' at the Edmonds Waterfront Center to raise money for the 2023 Lunar New Year Edmonds Celebration. More information is available at maedmonds.org. a Mayor Nelson announced the fire department will have a 9/11 Memorial Ceremony on Sunday, September 1 lt' at 9:11 a.m. at Station 17 in downtown Edmonds. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Teitzel thanked the council for their confidence and said he looked forward to working with the council again and saw great things ahead for the City. He expressed his appreciation and respect for the other 16 applicants; the City is fortunate to have qualified, well engaged citizens who are willing Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 73 8.2.a to serve. There are five positions open for election in 2023 and he encouraged each of the well -qualified applicants to consider pursuing those positions. He urged the applicants to stay in touch with him as he wanted to hear from them, noting he had a good conversation with Natalie Seitz this evening about what is needed on the east side of Highway 99. Councilmember Teitzel recognized Kristiana Johnson, a great councilmember for over a decade who cared about the City, grew up in Edmonds and he often heard her say she loved Edmonds. He shared that sentiment, having lived in Edmonds for decades and also loves Edmonds and wants nothing but the best for the City and its citizens and that can be accomplished by working together. He thanked the council for selecting him and urged the community to pay their respects and keep the legacy of the late Councilmember K. Johnson alive. Councilmember Chen commented he thought council decisions would get easier and easier but that does not seem to be happening. He thanked all 17 applicants for the council vacancy, relaying his tremendous respect for each one and recognizing they all have the community at heart. He thanked Councilmember Teitzel for getting out of the council business and his willingness to step up again. During this process, he was hoping for a new member of the community to share this responsibility. He encouraged the applicants to continue to be engage and to remember the One Edmonds concept; all the neighborhoods in Edmond deserve attention from City government. Councilmember Chen recognized the traditional Autumn Moon Festival and the Hispanic Heritage Festival, commenting the numerous heritages make this country a great nation. He advised of the Korean Moon Festival celebrated on Thursday night. Councilmember Buckshnis encouraged the applicants to call her about running a campaign for one of the five council seat that will be open next year; she has done three general elections and two primaries so she is well aware of what needs to be done. She appreciated all the work the applicants put in and their thoughtful applications. She recalled the selection of former Councilmember Mesaros took 59 ballots and Councilmember Teitzel only took 41. She was trying to honor her friend which is why stuck with one candidate although all the applicants were very good. Kristiana Johnson's family contacted her to recommend the selection of Dave Teitzel to fill Kristiana's seat and she wanted to be fair to her family and her legacy. Councilmember Buckshnis announced the Korean Harvest Moon Festival hosted by the Korean American Historical Society, the Seattle Washington Korean Association and the Korean Consulate Office in N partnership with the Edmonds Waterfront Center on Thursday, September 8tn from 6:30 to 9 p.m. in the o Waterfront Center banquet room. It is free to the community, no RSVP is required and the event will w include food tasting, costumes, and stories of Korean history. r c as Council President Olson commented literally nothing has been easy for the last 2t/2 years which includes E the process of selecting a new councilmember. She acknowledged she was stubbornly holding out for what was easiest and best going forward for both for the council and for Edmonds and thanked a Councilmember Teitzel for putting his hat in the ring. The council is facing an intense budget season and a year ahead so having someone so capable, reasonable, and thoughtful in his process will be a gift for all involved, including community. Council President Olson explained before Kristiana Johnson's unfortunate passing, she had been in conversation with the city attorney and the city clerk about the use of ranked choice voting for this process. However, Edmonds citizens do not like changing more than one thing at a time and she recognized it wasn't the right time to discuss a different approach while the council was filling a vacancy on the council. She is interested in the council considering a different approach and that is one approach Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 74 8.2.a that the city attorney, the city clerk and she have discussed that they think would be a good solution going forward. That will be discussed by the council and the community, possibly at a retreat or at a council meeting if time allows. Councilmember Tibbott thanked all the applicants. In addition to considering running for office, he encouraged them to look for opportunities to serve the City on one of the boards or commissions or other volunteer opportunities as they give insight into how the City runs, deliberations, collaboration, how to read a City packet and how to come to meetings prepared. He concurred with other councilmembers regarding the appointment of Dave Teitzel and looked forward to working with him. Councilmember Tibbott reported on the Snohomish Health District retreat that included six councilmembers from neighboring cities. It was a historic meeting as it was the last meeting of the health district before it becomes a department of Snohomish County. There were a lot of new staff present and it was an opportunity to inform board members and new staff members including the new health officer for Snohomish County of the health district's work and activities. He relayed the health district is basically the rapid response team for Snohomish County. First responders get a lot of recognition; a rapid response team prepares in advance to respond to crises. One of way they do that is by gathering data such as the data presented tonight regarding suicides in Snohomish County. The health district gathers a myriad facts and figures in order to gather resources, be prepared to respond, and to respond very rapidly as they did to COVID. The health district and soon to be health department deserve a lot more credit than they get because they are the rapid response team addressing health concerns and in some cases, very dire health needs for Snohomish County. Councilmember Tibbott displayed a Narcan kit he received and was trained to use at the health district retreat that he stores in his briefcase, relaying his understanding that Councilmember L. Johnson also has a Narcan kit. He advised a notebook containing the presentation from the health district's retreat is available in the council office. Councilmember Paine thanked all the applicants, recognizing they have gone through a lot tonight as well as preparing for interviews. This process has been used repeatedly and she was not sure it can be improved upon. She welcomed new Councilmember Teitzel. She expressed appreciation to the health district for talking about the importance of early intervention regarding suicide. Every loss is a loss to the community, family, school and friends. Councilmember L. Johnson welcomed Councilmember Teitzel. She thanked all the candidates, N recognizing it was not an easy process. The process she followed to join the council was different but she o was not sure which one she would pick as they were both nerve racking. Tomorrow is the first day of w school for Edmonds School District students and she hoped everyone had had a wonderful summer. To r everyone in an vehicle, she reminded them to be the lookout for students as pedestrians have the right-of- way. E ca Councilmember L. Johnson said she has had the same Narcan kit training and has actually done it. For a those fortunate enough to have health insurance, the kits are available at pharmacies without a prescription. She sent Narcan kits to college with each of her daughters, not because she was particularly concerned about them, but so they could use it for anyone in need. 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(I) At 9:17 p.m., the council convened in executive session for 60 minutes to discuss pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). The executive session concluded at 10:16 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 75 8.2.a 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION At 10:16 p.m., the council reconvened in open session. 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 10:16 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 6, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 76 N N (D O a) O W r C N E t v Q 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of Council Committee Minutes Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Committee Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative The Council committee meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: PSPHSP091322 FC091322 PPW091322 Packet Pg. 77 8.3.a PUBLIC SAFETY, PLANNING, HUMAN SERVICES & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING September 13, 2022 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Susan Paine (Chair) Rob English, Acting Public Works Director Council President Vivian Olson Dave Turley, Administrative Services Dir. Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk 1. CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council PSPHSP Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 212 — 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 4:30 p.m. by Councilmember Paine 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Changes to Finance Manager Job Description Mr. Turley advised minor changes were made to reflect that the position will report to the administrative services director instead of the public works director as most of work the person will do is finance related. The position is already a member of the AFSCME union which relates to administrative services rather than Teamsters which relates to public works. Questions and discussion followed regarding this change offering more flexibility to assist with other administrative services tasks, where the person will be physically located, and difficulty filling this position. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 2. Vacation Accrual for Returning Employee Mr. English advised Jerry Schuster worked for the City in 2008-2016 as a stormwater engineer and has worked for Bellevue since 2016. He applied for the City's stormwater engineer position and requested vacation accrual based on his prior years of service. Mr. De Lilla advised this has been done in the recent past for staff who have returned to the City as well as staff members with large amounts of experience. Mr. Schuster has been a stormwater engineer in the Puget Sound area for 30 years and this is a reasonable request. In response to a question, Mr. English advised the request is to base the vacation accrual rate on the years the employee worked for Edmonds. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 3. Opioid Settlement Allocation Agreement Ms. Cates advised the State Attorney General has been working on this with 125 municipalities. Edmonds was one of earlier adopters and providers of information. The allocation agreement between the state and municipalities adds more nuance to how the settlement amount will be allocated and Packet Pg. 78 8.3.a 09/13/22 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 2 spent. The agenda memo identifies the four required steps to be a participating jurisdiction; one does not apply to Edmonds, and the other three are related to signing the memorandum of understanding (signed in May), the subdivision participation form (signed in June), and the allocation agreement. If all the appropriate jurisdictions sign on, the allocation amount to be distributed 50/50 between the state and cities is $430 million paid out over 16 years. The first two payments (years one and two) are due December 1, 2022, followed by equal payments over the next 16 years. The City's allocation amount is 0.305% of the $430 million which equates to $1.3 million divided by 16. The deadline to sign the agreement is September 23, 2022. Committee recommendation: 09/20/22 consent agenda 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 4:42 p.m. Packet Pg. 79 8.3.b Elected Officials Present FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING September 13, 2022 Staff Present Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair) Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Councilmember Will Chen Todd Tatum, Comm. Serv. & Econ. Dev. Dir. Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Dir. Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., & Cultural Serv. Dir. Pamela Randolph, WWTP Manager Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council Finance Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 212 — 5` Avenue North, Edmonds, at 5:30 p.m. by Councilmember Buckshnis. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 2022 September Budget Amendment Ms. Randolph reviewed: • WWTP CIP Amendment (total is $589,166, Edmonds' portion is $299,220) • WWTP O&M Budget Amendment — insurance deductible for January 2022 peak flow event that flooded the 400 building (total $25,000, Edmonds' portion $11,000) • WWTP O&M Budget Amendment — extension of carbon recovery project Mr. Turley reviewed: • Additional funds to continue temporary staffing while a person is on administrative leave • Convert office on first floor of City Hall to be used as a physical location for the public to attend board and commission meetings • Public records request system maintenance • Increases in Microsoft Office 365 license counts and costs • Endpoint protection — implement tools that enhance security by better protecting workstations and providing visibility into network activity • Ebb Tide trial expenses • Park maintenance overtime due to lack of seasonal staff • State grant to assist with funding consultants for comprehensive plan update • Professional services for outside consultant plan review of building permits which has exceeded existing budget • Provide budget authority for small claims to be paid from the risk fund • Increased costs due to high fuel prices • Move designated ARPA budget to accounts from which expenditures will be made through end of 2022 • Civic Park Mitigation Project Questions and discussion followed regarding informing WWTP partners of their share of expenses, estimated timeline for completion of the carbon recovery project, WWTP flood repairs, whether the temporary staff person used in administrative services could be hired by the City, alternatives for N N M CD 0 U U- r c as E cc a Packet Pg. 80 8.3.b 09/13/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 providing a physical location for the public to attend meetings, new OPMA rules that require a physical location for the public to attend meetings, staffing the physical location in city hall, creating a remote work policy, whether to allow employees to continue to work remotely, whether employees working remotely should have individual VPNs, expenditures for expert witness testimony at the Ebb Tide trial, appreciation to parks staff for working necessary overtime, details regarding the state grant to assist with the comprehensive plan update, having staff available at council meetings to answer questions about budget amendments, using consultants to assist with plan review versus hiring staff, removal of funds from the CIP/CFP for the marsh and green streets, and flagging amendments that the committee questioned when bringing them to council. The committee requested an executive session to update the council on the Ebb Tide pending litigation. Committee recommendation: Full council. 5. 2020 Audit Follow-up Actions Mr. Turley advised the 2020 audit identified 33 potentially ineligible CARES Funds grant recipients. A letter was sent to the 33 businesses 2 weeks ago advising that the audit found they were not eligible and requesting repayment. Since then, it was discovered 2 of the businesses were closed, 12 did not respond, and 15 submitted additional documentation which he and Mr. Taraday plan to review next week. The remaining 4 ($34,000) have either repaid the grant or are on a payment plan. He will follow with a more sternly worded letter, possibly from the city attorney, for the 12 that did not respond. Committee recommendation: Information only 2. ARPA Program Status Report Mr. Tatum reviewed: Subdivision of Funds by Ordinance No. 4259 o City Expenditure Reimbursements: $750,000 o Edmonds Rescue Plan Household Support: $4,150,000 ■ Household Support • Utility Bill Support ■ Housing Repair o Edmonds Rescue Plan Business Support: $1,125,000 ■ General Business Support ■ Tourism Support ■ Small Business Support o Edmonds Rescue Plan Nonprofit Support: $500,000 o Edmonds Rescue Plan Job Retraining Program: $600,000 o City Green Infrastructure: $4,768,099 ■ Edmonds Marsh ■ Lower Perrinville Creek Realignment ■ Green Streets and Rain Gardens • Total ARPA Funds $11,893,099 N N M CD 0 U U- r c as E a Packet Pg. 81 8.3.b 09/13/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3 $394,740 A- City Expenditures -6.3% $7 0,809 $7 0,000 $7 7,785 B - Household Support - 34,9% $264,525 C- Business Support -9.5% $608, 83 $1,125,000 20,50 0- Nonprofit Support -4.2% $420,50 $500,0 0 $199,999 E-1a6Retreining-5.0% $600, $600, 510,926 F- Green Infrastructure -40.1% $99.250 $4,150,000 $0 $L000.000 52,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 ■ 5pent by 9/6/22 m Commitments @ 9/6/22 ■ Allocated Funds • Household Support Subcategories - $4,150,000 Housing Repair Utility Support 24.1 % 3.6% o Spent by 9/6/22 $0 $5,443 o Commitments @ 9/6/22 $0 $50,000 o Allocated Funds $1,000,000 $150,000 Household Grants 72.3% $772,343 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 • Business Support Subcategories - $1,125,000 Small Business Tourism Support Support Grants 25.7% 55.6% o Spent by 9/6/22 $184,161 o Commitments @ 9/6/22 $501,661 o Allocated Funds $625,000 • Nonprofit Support - 4.2% o 15 total grantees ■ All in 2021 ■ Ranged from $8,000-$50,000 - Spent by 8/22/22 $420,500 - Commitments @ 8/22/22 $420,500 - Allocated funds $500,000 • Job Retraining - 5% o Edmonds College: $325,000 over 3 years o Shoreline CC: $275,000 over 3 years ■ Spent by 8/22/22 $199,999 ■ Commitments @ 8/22/22 $600,000 ■ Allocated funds $600,000 • Green Infrastructure - 40.1 % o Edmonds Marsh Water Quality & Flood Control o Lower Perrinville Creek Realignment o Green Streets 0 96th Right of Way Infiltration $55,738 $73,395 $300,000 ■ Spent by 9/6/22/22 $10,926 ■ Commitments @ 9/6/22 $89,250 ■ Allocated funds $4,768,099 General Business Support 17.8% $24,627 $33,227 $200,000 $750,000 $2,968,099 $600,000 $450,000 Questions and discussion followed regarding the need to revise Ordinance 4259 to reflect changes made to the CIP/CFP to reduce funds for the Edmonds Marsh and green streets, support for implementing a household repair program, accounting for CARES and ARPA funds in the special revenue fund 142, adding presumption of impact language to the ordinance to make small business Packet Pg. 82 8.3.b 09/13/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 4 support grants more flexible, difference between small business support grants and general business support, reallocating funds from general business support to small business support grants, support for another round of applications for nonprofits funded by reallocating funds from green infrastructure, defining green streets, whether ARPA funds can be allocated for sidewalk construction, and contacting Edmonds-Woodway High School about the availability of job retraining funds. Committee recommendation: Full council 09/27/22 4. Employee Expense Reimbursement Policy Mr. Turley highlighted revisions made to the policy. Questions and discussion followed regarding non - city sponsored training and whether there should be a dollar limit for "reasonable" food and beverages. Committee recommendation: Full council. 6. Risk Management Policy Questions and discussion followed regarding the definition of "large claims," how a $5,000/claim payment approval limit was determined, when claims are forwarded to WCIA, whether the ability to authorize risk reserve claim payments is in the ordinance related to the city attorney, whether this policy addresses risks associated with the City's assets, whether the City paying small claims from the risk management policy would result in a reduction in the WCIA premium, and the council's request to develop this policy when a risk management fund was established last year. Committee recommendation: Mr. Taraday will discuss policy with HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson. 7. Business Improvement District - Collections Update Mr. Turley advised letters were sent to businesses in the BID that are in arrears; there was LA Q approximately $35,000 in late dues from active business and approximately the same from business N that had closed. Since the letter was sent out, active businesses have caught up late dues by 04 approximately $9,700; leaving approximately $33,600 in arrears from active businesses and another $40,000 due from businesses that have closed or are inactive. He plans to discuss with Mr. Taraday U removing the accounts for closed/inactivity businesses. He acknowledged the amount in arrears from r active businesses is primarily from 6-8 businesses. E Committee recommendation: Full council r w Q 3. July 2022 Monthly Financial Report Mr. Turley reviewed: • General Fund revenues for 7 months ended July 31 $347,000 under budget • General Fund spending for 7 months ended July 31 $3 million under budget • Sales tax revenues for 7 months ended July 31 $638,000 ahead of last year, and $814,000 ahead of budget • Sales Tax Revenue for 12 months ended July 31 by category: Packet Pg. 83 8.3.b 09/13/22 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 5 Sales lai .luah�is GJ l nleFai+ C'usrvul Peibtl: ]uh ?112= Y'exr-In.I1au Tot.! 54a31,�lx REET for 7 months ended July 31 under budget by $302,000 (partly due to an accounting change) o On track to collect around $4 million in 2022 Noteworthy items: o REET revenues are down a total of $835,896 from last year. The decrease for property taxes and REET is due in part to us having to back the December 2021 SnoCo deposit out of period 1 and into period 12 of 2021. Since our monthly reports are cash basis, that adjustment affected it whereas our year-end accruals don't affect this report. It will be the same for the monthly report until December of 2022, and then next year won't be affected by this. The entry that backed these revenues out of January 2022, decreased REET by $242,395. o The human resources department is over budget by about 15%, this is mostly attributable to the non -represented salary increase that went into effect in February. With other labor negotiations still ongoing, we have not yet done a budget amendment to account for the salary and benefit increases from the non -rep raises. o The difference for Fund 422 is primarily due a grant reimbursement in January of 2021. o Fund 112: The large traffic impact fee that was received in March of 2022 was for $133,581.97. o Fund 332: The large park impact fee that was received in March of 2022 was for $288,259.84. o Sales Tax is up $638,516 from last year. o Gas Utility Tax is up $74,300 from last year. o Parks & Recreation Program Fees are up $69,193 from last year. o Interfund Reimbursement — Contract Services — January through July of 2022 engineering overhead has not yet been recorded; we are waiting on this from engineering. January through July of 2021 was $1,258,371. o Total interest earnings for all funds are down a total of $(159,283) from this point in time last year; Fund 001 interest is down $(77,045). Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. N N M rn 0 U u_ r c d E U ca r w Q Packet Pg. 84 8.3.c PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING September 13, 2022 Elected Officials Participating Virtually Staff Participating Virtually Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Rob English, Acting Public Works Director Councilmember Dave Teitzel Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council Finance Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 212 — 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 7:32 p.m. by Councilmember Tibbott. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Job Order Contracting - Approval Process Mr. English explained when this was introduced at the August committee meeting, the committee requested staff create a boilerplate form for approving JOCs that were included in the budget on the consent agenda and not to go through the committee process. Mr. Sullivan explained the purchasing policy was changed in January 2022 to allow JOC, a new form of procurement allowed by the state. The sole goal of JOC is to expedite procurement of primarily construction services, not necessarily as a cost savings measure but to reduce the time and labor to get a project from thought to execution. Most of the larger JOC projects will go through the decision package process during budget deliberations. New or emergency projects will still go through the committee process. He displayed the proposed JOC Work Order Summary that includes project name, budget decision package #, budget amount, approval date, amount, budget estimate, fund #, BARS #, project description/narrative, project benefits, projected duration, and projected start date. Questions and discussion followed regarding the dollar amount of individual job order contracts, delays that occur using the existing process, contractors providing a price proposal for review, developing a policy regarding the process for approving JOCs, process for approving JOCs on the consent agenda that have been previously approved as decision packages, concern with committee members reviewing projects outside of a public meeting, how other cities approve JOCs, and content of the annual JOC report. Mr. Taraday, Mr. Sullivan, and Mr. English will discuss an intermediate step that allows contracts to go to the consent agenda and not through the monthly open committee meeting. Committee recommendation: Develop a policy for PPW committee consideration at the next meeting. 2. Presentation of PSA Supplement with Landau Associates for the Civic Center Playfield Project Mr. English advised this supplemental agreement is to provide additional geotechnical construction and monitoring services to assist the construction management team at the Civic Center project. Some of the budget was consumed related to groundwater and peat issues; onsite inspection services will be Packet Pg. 85 8.3.c 09/13/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 required related to installation of the restroom building as well as other aspects of the project. The supplement is $18,665 which takes the contract over $100,000. The supplement will be funded by Civic Playfield project funds. Mr. English responded to questions regarding whether additional supplements with Landau Associates were anticipated, the geotechnical engineer providing recommendations to the contractor to address groundwater and soil issues, and availability of funds for this supplement. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 3. Presentation of Construction Contract for the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Protect Mr. English explained Phase 2 will expand the capacity of an existing infiltration facility in Seaview Park to reduce peak flows in Perrinville Creek. A Department of Ecology grant was secured for the project which requires a 25% match. All bids were rejected for the initial June bid opening; the project was rebid in August and bids opened September 6t". Three bids were submitted, the low bid was provided by WSB Excavating & Utilities in the amount of $373,941; the other bids were $419,677 and $531,821. The engineer's estimate was $344,555. Reference checks on the low bid contractor were positive. He reviewed: • Proposed construction budget Description Amount Contract Award $373,941 Contract Award M mt. Reserve 20% $74,788 Construction M mt., Insp., & Testing 20% $74,788 1 % Arts (non -grant portion of project $935 Total $524,452 Funding Amount Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $160,252 Grant — Department of Ecology $364,200 Total Funds Available $542,452 Questions and discussion followed regarding the difference between the bid amounts, reasons for the 20% management reserve, whether Phase 1 had reduced stormwater flows in Perrinville Creek, why the project was done in two phases, and a preference to refer this project to full council due to the public interest's in Perrinville Creek. Committee recommendation: Five minute presentation to full council 4. Street Dedication at Intersection of 162nd St SW and 74th PI W Mr. English explained this is related to a proposed 2-lot subdivision at the east corner of 162nd St SW & 74t" PI W. Issues were identified during plan review with the location of the existing street compared to the location of the right-of-way; a portion of the roadway as well as existing utilities are outside the right- of-way on private property and the easement captures only a portion of the roadway and utilities. He referred to Attachment 3, Access and Utility Easement, that identifies the existing easement and proposed street dedication area to place the road and utilities within the public right-of-way. Ms. McConnell added it is basically an extension of 162nd St SW to the east. Questions and discussion followed regarding the requirement for council approval of a street dedication, location of the street dedication, and agreement by the property owner. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda. Packet Pg. 86 8.3.c 09/13/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 5. Presentation of City of Edmonds Stormwater Management Action Plan (SMAP) to Meet NPDES Stormwater Permit Requirements Mr. De Lilla explained the City has a federal Municipal Stormwater Permit that is managed by the Department of Ecology. The permit is on a five year cycle and the City must follow certain requirements. The SMAP is a new requirement. If DOE's deadlines are not met, the City is not compliant with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit that regulates stormwater and quantifies how to address polluted stormwater via best management practices. Rebecca Dugopolski, Herrera Environmental Consultants, provided an update on Edmonds Stormwater Action Planning: • Project background o Driver: Municipal Stormwater Permit ■ Stormwater planning requirements include a water health assessment (March 2022), selecting a priority watershed (June 2022), and developing an implementation plan (March 2023) o Public Input ■ Workshops ■ StoryMap and Survey • Stormwater Permit History o Phase I (populations > 100,000) o Phase II (generally populations > 10,000) o Current Phase 1 and II permits issued by Ecology on July 1, 2019 ■ Became effective August 1, 2019 ■ Expire on July 31, 2024 • Project Schedule o Jan — Feb 2022 StoryMap and Public Survey 0 02/08/22 and 02/10/22 Public Workshops 0 03/31/22 Water Health Assessment Complete (met permit deadline) 0 06/30/22 Selection of Priority Watershed Complete (met permit deadline) 0 03/31/23 Implementation Plan Deadline Watershed Prioritization Process Step 1 Develop list of candidate watersheds 9 watersheds Step 2 Evaluate candidate watersheds 6 candidate watersheds Step 3 Evaluate restoration and moderate restoration 4 watersheds watersheds (jurisdiction control, social equity, public feedback, promotes other plans/projects Step 4 Select highest priority watershed and catchment 1 highest priority watershed Refine List of Candidate Watersheds o Excluded Watershed City Control Acres in City Reason for Exclusion Deer Creek 43% 97 Size Lund's Gulch Creek 4% 55 Size & low City control Southwest Edmonds 13% 72 Size o Retain for Prioritization Watershed City Control Acres in City Edmonds Marsh 77% 1,406 Hall Creek -Lake Ballinger 16% 829 Northstream-Fruitdale Creeks 100% 774 Perrinville Creek 42% 541 Shell Creek 100% 1,340 Stilthouse-Terrace Creeks 86% 476 Packet Pg. 87 8.3.c 09/13/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4 Select Metrics o Water Use Importance ■ Public Recreation Access ■ Wellhead protection area (10 year time of travel) ■ Forage fish nearshore species use ■ Pocket Estuary —juvenile fish habitat/fish use o Development and Growth ■ Percent total imperious area • Percent development in riparian buffer ■ Expected population growth o Water and Habitat Conditions ■ Listed water quality impairments ■ Water quality concerns from local studies ■ Fish passage barriers per stream mile Watershed Manaaement Matrix and Retrofit Strateav H-0-t watershed Management Matrix 3 oration ii n E Rest--�: 0 Conservation j oerelop NO Lownt lewlofkgndatlon Nei ,t Identify Restoration and Moderate Restoration Watersheds o Six Candidate Watersheds (Step 2) ■ Edmonds Marsh ■ Hall Creek -Lake Ballinger ■ Northstream-Fruitdale Creeks ■ Perrinville Creek ■ Shell Creek ■ Stilthouse-Terrace Creeks Water Use Development Water and Habitat Watershed Watershed Importance and Growth Conditions Management Goal Retrofit Strategy Perrinville High Low LowlGood Restoration Proactive Creek Edmonds High High HighlPoor Moderate Restoration Proactive Marsh Shell Creek High High HighlPoor Moderate Restoration Proactive Hall Creek- Moderate High HighlPoor Moderate Restoration Proactive Ballinger Northstream- Low Low LowlGood Development ` Opportunity Fruitdale Creeks Stilthouse- Low Low LowlGood Development Opportunity Terrace Creeks o Four restoration and moderate restoration watersheds (Step 3) ■ Edmonds Marsh ■ Hall Creek -Lake Ballinger ■ Perrinville Creek ■ Shell Creek Packet Pg. 88 8.3.c 09/13/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 5 Watershed I Public Input Social Equity Projects Perrinville ist in public and for EHD composite score • Seaview Infiltration Facility Phase II (2022-2023) Creek survey/ workshop (upper basin ranked higher • Perrinville Creek Retrofit Study (projects compared to lower basin) identified in 2015) • Perrinville Creek Recovery Project Hall Creek— znd in public ist for EHD composite score • Ballinger Regional Stormwater Facility at Ballinger survey/workshop MathayPublic Park (5.8years) • Lake Ballinger Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Project (planned for 2023) Edmonds 3rd in public 3rd for EHD composite score Willow Creek Daylight and Marsh Enhancement Marsh survey/ workshop (upper basin ranked higher Project (currently on hold) compared to lower basin) Shell Creek rth in public rth for EHD composite score No stormwater projects or plans identified survey/workshop • Identify Priority Watershed o One priority watershed (Step 4) ■ Perrinville Creek Next Steps o Identify the following and document in the Implementation Plan: ■ Retrofit opportunities ■ Existing projects (with updated cost estimates) ■ Land management/development strategies ■ Enhanced stormwater management actions ■ Proposed implementation schedule/budget/funding sources - Short-term actions (6 years) - Long-term actions (7 to 20 years) Questions and discussion followed regarding permit requirements, infiltration project planned for Shell Creek as part of Civic Park, erosion issues in Shellabarger Creek, survey response rate, outreach for public survey/workshop, percentage of Hall Creek -Lake Ballinger within Edmonds' control, percentage of Perrinville Creek that is in Snohomish County, how the priority watershed was selected, locating projects in the implementation plan within Edmonds, examples of land management development strategies, and a fish passage barrier in Shell Creek at 7th & Glen on private property that is not in WDFW database. Committee recommendation: Full council 6. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with Herrera Environmental Consultants for the Stormwater Management Action Plan (SMAP) Mr. De Lilla explained the SMAP is part of the stormwater comprehensive plan update, but without a stormwater engineer, Herrera was selected to assist with meeting the SMAP timelines. The next portion of the effort to complete the SMAP process will be time consuming. Once a stormwater engineer is hired, work on the stormwater comprehensive plan will continue. Mr. De Lilla responded to questions regarding funding provided for the supplemental agreement from the Utility Fund and carryforward for work on the stormwater comprehensive plan update. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 7. Supplemental Agreement with HKA Global, Inc for the Carbon Recovery Project Mr. English explained HKA Global provides construction management support services to the WWTP manager for the carbon recovery project such as evaluating potential change order requests, review of extra costs, disputed work, time extension requests, etc. The cost of the supplemental agreement is Packet Pg. 89 8.3.c 09/13/22 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 6 $124,475; approximately $82,000 is for services into February 2023, $31,600 to support staff evaluating disputed work, and a $10,000 management reserve. Questions and discussion followed regarding the original HKA contract plus supplemental agreements #1 and #2, allocation of the expense between Edmonds and the WWTP partners, informing partner cities of this expense, target completion date of the carbon recovery project and start-up period, complexity of the project, and the funding source. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 8. Public Water Meter Vault Easement at 23610 Highway 99 Mr. English advised this is related to the Apollo Apartments at 236th & Highway 99 where a new 3" water meter service will be installed with the development. The meter does not fit within the 13' foot right-of- way plus an easement, so additional area is needed for the water meter vault. The easement provided will be approximately 12' x 25 feet. Questions and discussion followed regarding the size of the water meter and similar easements. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 10/4/22 (depending on outcome of public hearing on 9/27/22 regarding surplus of the easement). 9. Resolution Declaring Utility Easements as Surplus at 23610 Highway 99 Mr. English explained this resolution declares the existing 5' wide storm/sewer easement on the east side of the parcel surplus. Construction of the proposed development includes installation of a new sewer service directly into 236th so the existing easement is no longer needed. The developer is required to provide a pedestrian easement for frontage improvements on Highway 99 and 236th. He recommended scheduling both the pedestrian and water meter easement for the10/4/22 meeting after the 9/27/22 public hearing regarding surplusing the storm/sewer easement. Mr. Taraday advised the surplus resolution can go on the consent agenda; the public hearing should happen after the council adopts the surplus resolution. Questions and discussion followed regarding the timing of the resolution and the public hearing, and the difference between vacation and release of easement. Committee recommendation: Resolution on 9/20/22 or 9/27/22 consent agenda and public hearing at 9/27/22 meeting 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:21 p.m. Packet Pg. 90 8.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of claim checks. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #253991 through #254074 dated September 8, 2022 for $419,038.98, check #254075 dated September 14, 2022 for $812.00 and checks #254076 through #254186 dated September 15, 2022 for $1,032,232.83. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 09-08-22 claim 08-14-22 claims 09-15-22 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 09-15-22 Packet Pg. 91 8.4.a vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253991 9/8/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 253992 9/8/2022 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice I N V-2-21341 61658 253993 9/8/2022 070466 ADEFUA CULTURAL ED WORKSHOP 8/23/22 HMP 253994 9/8/2022 078776 AKRAMOFF LLC 20033 PO # Description/Account EDMONDS PD - TRYKAR BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 CONCEALABLE CARRIER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 TRAUMA PLATE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 EXTERNAL CARRIER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 SAFARILAND ID PANEL W/ HEAT PF 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2 NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2 VELCRO 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Total WWTP: 9/1/22 PEST CONTROL SEF 9/1/22 Pest Control Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total HAZEL MILLER PLAZA CONCERT Agreement for Presentation Services: 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATION PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATION 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 Page Amoun 960.0( N 93.0( t U 26.0( E 255.0( 0 27.0( > 0 18.0( a a 12.0( N 00 140.5- c 1,531.51 o N E 77.0( c m 8.0� E 85.05 @ M r Q 750.0( 750.0( 5,152.0( Page: 1 Packet Pg. 92 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 253994 9/8/2022 078776 078776 AKRAMOFF LLC 253995 9/8/2022 077610 ALBA PAINTING & COATINGS 253996 253997 253998 9/8/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 8/16/2022 082522003 090622021 9/8/2022 074718 AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES INC 22816 23019 9/8/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 656000235411 8.4.a Page: 2 PO # Description/Account Amoun Total : 5,152.0( MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - PRE MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - PRE 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 13,500.0( ui 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,417.5( Total: 14,917.5( U WWTP: ACCT: COEWASTE: 8/29/22 Acct COEWaste:- o 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 53.5( -R 10.5% Sales Tax o 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 5.6, Q. FINANCE DEPT WATER Q Finance dept water �- 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 51.2.E N 10.5% Sales Tax 00 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 0 5.3£ Total : 115.7E o N E YOST POOL/SPA SUPPLIES: HOT T YOST POOL/SPA SUPPLIES: HOT T 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 91.3, 10.5% Sales Tax t 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5� YOST POOL/SPA SUPPLIES: CHEM @ YOST POOL/SPA SUPPLIES: CHEM Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2,004.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 210.4, Total : 2,315.3! PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 55.5( Page: 2 Packet Pg. 93 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 3 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253998 9/8/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.8< 6560061777 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 60.3" 10.5% Sales Tax 0 U 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 6.3: E 6560061778 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS R FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9' O 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9' o 6560063724 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE a PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Q 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6" N PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE N 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' o PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE c 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' N PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE E 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0£ u. 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 3 Packet Pg. 94 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 253998 9/8/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 253999 9/8/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER PO # Description/Account 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6560063725 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 Total 124846 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 2472 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 2472 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 2472 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 2472 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 10.25% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 2472 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 124853 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 1760 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 8.4.a Page: 4 Amoun J.. I't N m 9.2� E 19.1('M Z 4" 1.5-, O R 1.4', o 225.7( a a N N 181.1( c am 0 181.1( N E 186.5£ 563.3< y E 18.5E U M r 563.3< a 18.5E 19.1: 128.91 Page: 4 Packet Pg. 95 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 5 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253999 9/8/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) UB Outsourcing area Printing 1760 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 128.9z UB Outsourcing area Printing 1760 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 132.8z UB Outsourcing area Postage 1760 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 399.6E UB Outsourcing area Postage 1760 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 399.6z 10.25% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 13.2, 10.25% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 13.2, 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 13.6- Total : 2,961.7' 254000 9/8/2022 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 82433 ROUGH BOX - HELGELAND ROUGH BOX - HELGELAND 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 844.0( 82537 ROUGH BOX - HOLSENBACK ROUGH BOX - HOLSENBACK 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 844.0( Total: 1,688.0( 254001 9/8/2022 073041 BECK & ASSOCIATES PLLC 2022-EDM-06/07/08 BUILDING - PROF SVCS Prof svcs June - Aug 2022- 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 2,340.0( Total : 2,340.0( 254002 9/8/2022 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 16309 E22GA/SERVICES THRU 7.22.22 E22GA/SERVICES THRU 7.22.22 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 24,918.4E Total : 24,918.4E 254003 9/8/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 1360198 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 649.50 GF Page: 5 Packet Pg. 96 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254003 9/8/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS (Continued) FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 649.50 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,496.8- Total : 1,496.81 254004 9/8/2022 075874 BULGER SAFE & LOCK 69896 FAC MAINT - SHOP KEY STOCK FAC MAINT - SHOP KEY STOCK 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 59.3( 10.25% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.OE Total : 65.31 254005 9/8/2022 078083 BUYCE JR, RICHARD J 10681 TRAINING 10681 CIRCUIT TRAINING INSTRUC 10681 CIRCUIT TRAINING INSTRUC 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 90.0( Total : 90.0( 254006 9/8/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 29014075 C2501 F contract charges 8/2022 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 26.4z 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.7E 29014095 LEASE FOR COPIER TO COUNCIL 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 3.Of Lease for copier to Council office 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 29.0E Total: 61.3° 254007 9/8/2022 079089 CATALYST CONSTRUCTION STF2022-0008 PERMIT FEE REFUND STF2022-0008 (21200 72nd AVE W)- 001.000.257.620 55.0( Total : 55.0( 254008 9/8/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC CD83246 MS SURFACE PRO DOCK MS Surface Pro Dock Page: 6 Packet Pg. 97 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254008 9/8/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 254009 9/8/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 7 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 119.0 1 10.5% Sales Tax 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 12.5( CJ85420 STARTECH MDP TO HDMI Startech MDP to HDMI 4K 60Hz conv 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 207.6� 10.5% Sales Tax E 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 CK57060 CISCO CATALYST 9200L NETWORK Cisco Catalyst 9200L Network Esseni o 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 3,627.7E 10.5% Sales Tax o L 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 380.9- a CL89933 CISCO CATALYST 9200L NETWORK Q Cisco Catalyst 9200L Network Esseni 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 N 3,627.7E N 10.5% Sales Tax o 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 380.9' c CM40653 ADOBE ACROBAT PRO Adobe Acrobat Pro - Qty 6 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 3,059.4( 10.5% Sales Tax a ; 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 321.21 y Total: 11,759.0° E U RN06220984 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL f° r YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL Q 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 63.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 6.6, RN08220990 YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL YOST POOL CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 63.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 6.6, Page: 7 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 254009 9/8/2022 003510 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) 254010 9/8/2022 075162 CITIES DIGITAL INC 55303 254011 9/8/2022 079062 COMCAST 254012 9/8/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8.24.22 Comcast 8498310301175175 254013 9/8/2022 078498 COMMUNITIES OF COLOR COALITION 1004 254014 9/8/2022 075648 COVICH-WILLIAMS CO INC 254015 9/8/2022 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 352504-IN 3381158 8.4.a Page: 8 Description/Account Amoun Total : 139.2' LASERFICHE ANNUAL SUPPORT & Laserfiche Annual Support & Updates 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 20,248.0( ui 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 2,126.0z t Total: 22,374.0z U PERMIT FEE REFUND Various Permits - fee refunds- 0 001.000.369.91.000.00 4,175.0( R Total: 4,175.0( o L CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S� CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl Q 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 143.9E N Total : 143.9° 00 0 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPORT GRA rn 0 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPORT GRA 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 -2,240.8z •� PMT 7 FINAL ERPF HOUSEHOLD SI PMT 7 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPOF 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 12075.8E Total : 9:835.0, U FLEET - DIESEL FUEL ISLAND FILTI f° r FLEET - DIESEL FUEL ISLAND FILTI Q 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 833.3� 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 87.5- Tota I : 920.9( EOFA/INVITATION TO BID 8.2022 EOFA/INVITATION TO BID 8.2022 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 979.8( Page: 8 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 9 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254015 9/8/2022 006200 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE (Continued) Total : 979.8( 254016 9/8/2022 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY LAU-WA-W657-22 WWTP: 7/16/22-7/15/23 LAB ACCRE 7/16/22-7/15/23 Lab Accreditation 423.000.76.535.80.41.50 840.0( ui Total: 840.0( m 254017 9/8/2022 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 22-4180 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES t U City Council Meeting minutes 8/16/22 E 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 698.4( Total: 698.4( o 254018 9/8/2022 007253 DUNN LUMBER 8883648 LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES/ WOOD > LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES/ WOOD o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 126.2z o- 10.3% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.0" N 8885515 LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES/ ROUTER E ao LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES/ ROUTER E C 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 86.1E c 10.6% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total : 234.5: 254019 9/8/2022 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 00010128833 PM SUPPLIES: DETERGENT a: d PM SUPPLIES: DETERGENT E t 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.9E UM 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.1( Total : 22.0F 254020 9/8/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 3251 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES/ SIMPLE GRE LIBRARY - SUPPLIES/ SIMPLE GRE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.1 E 3260 PM: BATTERY Page: 9 Packet Pg. 100 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 10 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254020 9/8/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) PM: BATTERY 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.9� 10.5% Sales Tax -71 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.0E 3263 PM: LED HEAD LAMP U m PM: LED HEAD LAMP 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 44.9E E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 _M 4.7, 3266 PM: DECK SPRAYER O PM: DECK SPRAYER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 34.9� 0- 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.6 � Q Total : 111.5' N N 254021 9/8/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR227209 B/W AND COLOR USAGE 7/19 - 8/1 £ 00 0 B/W and Color usage 7/19 - 8/18 c 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 10.2( N 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 1.0 T AR228013 CEMETERY MF1238 COPIER: S/N 3 CEMETERY MF1238 COPIER: S/N 3 m 130.000.64.536.50.45.00 4.2E E 10.5% Sales Tax U 130.000.64.536.50.45.00 0.4E r AR228520 MK5532 C165 CONTRACT CHARGE Q B/W copier charges 8/1 /22 - 8/31 /22 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 7.5E Color copier charges 8/1/22 - 8/31/22 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 188.4E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.31.45.00 20.5E AR228522 DEV SVCS MONTHLY COPIER LEA,' Dev Svcs Copier (SN: 3AP01472)- Page: 10 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254021 9/8/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 254022 9/8/2022 076992 ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS 254023 9/8/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 254024 9/8/2022 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS 254025 9/8/2022 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL AR228801 W110 1 EDH960986 EDH961912 PO # Description/Account 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02 Maintenance 07/21/22 - 08/20/22 Car 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total DEV SVCS PROF SVCS People, STreets & Public Space Outn 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total EOFA/INVITATION TO BID 8.2022 EOFA/INVITATION TO BID 8.2022 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PLN202, Public hearing notice PLN2022-0045 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 Total NFalkAug2022 MILEAGE REIMB Mileage remimb for Aug 2022- 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 Total 021735442 1001074529 - EDMONDS PD - STAN SALOMON BOOTS - SWAT 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.24.00 8.4.a Page: 11 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 254025 9/8/2022 002500 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL (Continued) 254026 9/8/2022 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 0000035187 254027 9/8/2022 012199 G RAI N G E R 254028 9/8/2022 067615 GTS INTERIOR SUPPLY 254029 9/8/2022 076333 HASA INC 9408673763 9410334701 40117196-00 844913 Description/Account FLEET - TIRES FLEET - TIRES 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 WA STATE TIRE TAX FEE 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 Total Total PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT & PUBLIC SAFETY - SU FAC MAINT-SUPPLIES/ EAR PLUG 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 PUBLIC SAFETY - V-BELT 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 HANDLING CHARGE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.9% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total WWTP: 8/29/22 SOD. HYPOCHLORI SOD. HYPOCHLORITE 8.4.a Page: 12 Amoun 204.35 549.9E ui 4.0( U 58.3( 612.2E Z 4- 0 �a 0 136.7- Q. a a 14.3 1 " N N 0 0 106.3, 9 0 N 25.4z E 13.& 296.6 , c m E t U M 18.6, 210.11 Page: 12 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254029 9/8/2022 076333 HASA INC (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 7,142.7E 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 749.9E Total: 7,892.7, ui 254030 9/8/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0552981539 PINE RIDGE PARK HONEY BUCKET t PINE RIDGE PARK HONEY BUCKET U 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 252.4.E 0552981540 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER HC o 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 439.9E R 0552986524 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET 0 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET Q. 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4E Q 0552986526 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC .. HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC C14 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 346.0( c 0552986527 WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I N 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 240.3E E 0552986529 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 439.6( 0552986530 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE E PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4.E° Total : r 1,959.2E Q 254031 9/8/2022 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE BID-0822ED BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER AUG BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER AUG 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 2,766.6� Total : 2,766.E , 254032 9/8/2022 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG BID-ED2022-08 BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY AUGUST BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY AUGUST Page: 13 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 14 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254032 9/8/2022 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG (Continued) 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.0( Tota I : 600.0( 254033 9/8/2022 076136 JEFF ANDERSON BID-080522 BID/ED! LOVIN SUMMER DESIGN N BID/ED! LOVIN SUMMER DESIGN \A 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 400.0( Total : 400.0( 254034 9/8/2022 078946 KITCHENS, KYLEE 10902 BARRE 10902 BARRE CLASS INSTRUCTIOI 10902 BARRE CLASS INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 100.8( Tota I : 100.8( 254035 9/8/2022 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 51783 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 8.6.22 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 8.6.22 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 776.8, EOMA/SERVICES THRU 8.6.22 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 232.0E Total: 1,008.9, 254036 9/8/2022 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING 4760821 S185 ACCT#2185-952778-727 CITY HALL Shredding services 8/24/22 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 25.0( Shredding services 8/24/22 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 25.0( Tota I : 50.0( 254037 9/8/2022 078471 LEMM, KEVIN 10664 TAEKWON-DO 10664 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI` 10664 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI` 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 759.6( Total : 759.6( 254038 9/8/2022 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 20583 expenses 07-2022 REIMBURSEMENT FOR EX 07/22 reimbursement for expenses - 001.000.36.515.41.41.00 510.6, Page: 14 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 15 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254038 9/8/2022 073603 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC (Continued) Total : 510.6, 254039 9/8/2022 074848 LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC 2022-1092 REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i REAL ESTATE/LAND ACQUISITION i 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 11,894.2E Total : 11,894.21 254040 9/8/2022 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0157985 F.A.C. - PAINT F.A.C. - PAINT 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 399.9E ECO FEES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 42.2( Total : 444.1( 254041 9/8/2022 079084 MCLAUGHLIN, SUSAN SMcLaughlin AUG2022 EMPLOYEE REIMB Reimb for lunch at Chanterelle- 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 18.7E Total: 18.71 254042 9/8/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 381092 PM: HEDGE TRIMMER BLADE CLE/ PM: HEDGE TRIMMER BLADE CLE/ 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 21.9( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.3( Total: 24.2( 254043 9/8/2022 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0807673-IN UNIT 121 - DEF UNIT 121 - DEF 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 262.9( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 27.6' Tota I : 290.5' 254044 9/8/2022 078847 NEWNUM, BETSY 10671 YOGA 10671 YOGA INSTRUCTION 10671 YOGA INSTRUCTION Page: 15 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254044 9/8/2022 078847 NEWNUM, BETSY (Continued) 254045 9/8/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER July, 2022 254046 9/8/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0021400 254047 9/8/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-225552 8.4.a Page: 16 PO # Description/Account Amoun 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 149.6( Total : 149.6( COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI` ui Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 304.3- t PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account U 001.000.237.130 6,189.5- Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 490.5E o State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 40.5z o Judicial Information Systems AccountCL Q. 001.000.237.180 1,643.8z Q School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 N N 265.0� N Washington Auto Theft Prevention c 001.000.237.250 609.2E c Traumatic Brain Injury y 001.000.237.260 290.8( E Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 193.1 a ; WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 230.0E E Motorcycle Safety Acct 001.000.237.420 194.0� r Total : 10,451.21 Q FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 506.2, Total : 506.2, UNIT 121 -PARTS/ AIR FILTER UNIT 121 -PARTS/ AIR FILTER Page: 16 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254047 9/8/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 31.3z 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.2� 3685-225555 UNIT 75 & 100 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER; UNIT 75 & 100 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER; 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.1 E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.2, Total : 58.01 254048 9/8/2022 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 38009 WWTP: THRU 7/30/22 CONSTRUCT THRU 7/3022 CONSTRUCTION SER 423.100.76.594.35.41.00 12,831.5( 38086 WWTP: THRU 7/30/22 DESIGN SER THRU 7/30/22 DESIGN SERVICES 423.100.76.594.35.41.00 1,171.0' Total : 14,002.5: 254049 9/8/2022 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 3D24376 PM: IRRIGATION PARTS PM: IRRIGATION PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 94.0, 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8, Total : 101W 254050 9/8/2022 078283 REINTEGRATED MEDIA 447 A/V TECH SUPPORT FOR HYBRID Meeting 8/2 4 hours, Meeting 8/16 4 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 2,100.0( Total: 2,100.0( 254051 9/8/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 300.E , 3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Page: 17 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 18 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254051 9/8/2022 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 (Continued) 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 45.4( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 172.5< --. PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 172.5< PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 172.5< E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 _R 172.5' PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : O 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 172.5 > 3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 0- FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST : a 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 319.7E Q 3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL N CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 00 74.6, o Total : 1,603.OS c N 254052 9/8/2022 068657 ROBERT HALF 60643355 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING E Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 488.0( r 60658394 TEMPORARY HELP WEEK ENDING Temp Position at Customer: Bookkee m E 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 2,440.0( U Total : 2,928.0( r Q 254053 9/8/2022 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC S3-7505696 FLEET - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS FLEET - PARTS/ BRAKE PADS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 265.01 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 27.& S3-7513087 UNIT 436 - PARTS/ TPMS SENSOR UNIT 436 - PARTS/ TPMS SENSOR 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 110.8z Page: 18 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254053 9/8/2022 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 254055 9/8/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 19 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.6' Total: 415.3' 200124873 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W N TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 40.7E U E 200202919 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 67.1 o 200274959 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W 0 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 21.5, Q. 200326460 HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON a HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 20.7f N 200422418 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( c FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 721.6E y 200493153 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W E TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W T 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 37.7, 200663953 ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 68.2( U 200748606 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW° TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW r Q 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 23.7, 200943348 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 44.7( 201054327 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 I BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 43.3E 201103561 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI Page: 19 Packet Pg. 110 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254055 9/8/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 20 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 36.8, 201192226 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 21.5, 201501277 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F E 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 23.2z 201532926 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- o 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 148.3( �a 201563434 TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA o TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA a 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 35.1E Q 201703758 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10( N N 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 33.6E o 201711785 STREET LIGHTING 1 LIGHTS @ 15( c STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ y 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 8.61 E 202077194 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE a ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 625.3� y 202139655 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 E BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 29.6f r 202161535 CEMETERY WELL PUMP Q CEMETERY WELL PUMP 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 295.4f 202250635 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 21.5, 202289096 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 58.4( Page: 20 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254055 9/8/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 21 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 202356739 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 33.4� .. 202499539 LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 409.7, 202529186 STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ E STREET LIGHTING (406 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 4,045.3E 202529202 STREET LIGHTING 7 LIGHTS @ 40( o STREET LIGHTING (7 LIGHTS @ 40 R 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 113.1 E o 202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C a STREET LIGHTING (2097 LIGHTS C Q 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 13,801.9z N 202579488 STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 N STREET LIGHTING (33 LIGHTS @ 2 0 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 387.9' c 202579520 WWTP: 8/1-8/31/22 ENERGY MGMT y 8/1-8/23/22 ENERGY MANAGEMEW E 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 11.4- 204714893 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' a ; STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' y 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 6.2z E 204714927 STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 U STREET LIGHTING (19 LIGHTS @ 2 r 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 162.3' Q 204714935 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 88.5" 204714943 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 STREET LIGHTING (4 LIGHTS @ 10 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 19.2� 204714950 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 Page: 21 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254055 9/8/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 254056 9/8/2022 037376 SNO CO PUD NO 1 254057 9/8/2022 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 22 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 138.0- 205307580 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 144.2, 220547582 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 41.8E E 220792758 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 70.8E o 221593742 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W �a TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W o L 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 82.5< a 222398059 SIGNAL CABINET 22730 HIGHWAY' Q 22730 Highway 99, Signal Cabinet - 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 78.5E N cm N 222818874 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A) c Decorative Lighting 115 2nd Ave S / c 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 22.7E N Total: 22,085.91 E �a ENG2022-0297 PERMIT FEEVREFUND ENG2022-0297 (ROW-DUC)- 001.000.257.620 370.0( E Total: 370.0( U �a 5002 SEPT-2022 COMMUNICATION DISP Q SEPT-2022 COMMUNICATION DISP, 001.000.39.528.00.41.50 76,390.8E SEPT-2022 COMMUNICATION DISP, 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 2,010.2E SEPT-2022 COMMUNICATION DISP 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 2,010.2� Total : 80,411.4: Page: 22 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 23 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254058 9/8/2022 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER July 2022 Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 128.7, Total: 128.7, 254059 9/8/2022 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 26132 WWTP: 8/2022 JANITORIAL SERW N 8/2022 JANITORIAL SERVICES 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 1,165.E - U Total : 1,165.61 254060 9/8/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N o 'R 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 720.7- o 103584 WWTP: ACCT 103584 - 8/2022 REC' Q. ACCT 103584 - 8/2022 RECYCLING Q 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 103585 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( N FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 00 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 0 704.5E 9 103586 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST o SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST E E 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 605.1E .� 103587 PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC c 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 246.3E E 103588 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N +a, 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 459.8� Q 201159 WWTP: ACCT #201159 - 8/2022 GA ACCT #201159 - 8/2022 GARBAGE - 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 184.5 Total: 2,960.0 , 254061 9/8/2022 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3006137315 CUST 6076358 - EDMONDS PD MED BOX DISPOSAL PLUS MONTH 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 35.9� Page: 23 Packet Pg. 114 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 24 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254061 9/8/2022 071585 071585 STERICYCLE INC (Continued) Total : 35.9' 254062 9/8/2022 067628 THE PIN CENTER 0822088 COE PINS COE pins 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 584.5( Total : 584.5( 254063 9/8/2022 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 22693 CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITAL ADVE CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITALADVE 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 3,200.0( 25787 TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) TOURISM PROMOTION - GOOGLE ) 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 7,400.0( 26061 CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITAL ADVE CREATIVE DISTRICT DIGITAL ADVE 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 3,200.0( Total : 13,800.0( 254064 9/8/2022 079017 TONG, JESSIE 8/1-8/22 ATTENDANT 8/1-8/22 OUTDOOR VOLLEYBALL 8/1-8/22 OUTDOOR VOLLEYBALL X 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 210.0( Total : 210.0( 254065 9/8/2022 073255 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC 2525128-00 FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE FILTERS FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE FILTERS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 57.6E Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.51 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.1( 2525128-01 FAC MANIT - CITYWIDE FILTERS FAC MANIT - CITYWIDE FILTERS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 312.6( Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.2E 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 24 Packet Pg. 115 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 25 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254065 9/8/2022 073255 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 33.7� 2525128-02 FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 50.1; Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.61' 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.7( 2525128-03 FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 61.0E Freight o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.61' a 10.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.9( N 2525128-04 FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS N FAC MAINT - CITYWIDE FILTERS o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 366.4f c Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 21.0� . 10.5% Sales Tax `° 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 40.6E 2525128-05 FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE FILTERS y FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE FILTERS E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3,527.01 u Freight r 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 203.8E Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 391.7,' Total : 5,115.0 , 254066 9/8/2022 070774 ULINE INC 152062103 CUST 2634605 - EDMONDS PD ULINE MASKS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 72.0( 8OZ PURELL BOTTLES Page: 25 Packet Pg. 116 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254066 9/8/2022 070774 ULINE INC (Continued) 254067 9/8/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9914234885 9914234886 254068 9/8/2022 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 229579 254069 9/8/2022 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION 10-2022 PO # Description/Account 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Total : C/A 772540262-00001 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 421.000.74.534.80.49.20 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm 423.000.75.535.80.49.20 Trimble 1 - Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 Lake Ballinger monitor 422.000.72.531.90.49.20 Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 C/A 772540262-00002 Elevator & call out communication 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Total UNIT 144 - TOW/ HOOK FEE UNIT 144 - TOW/ HOOK FEE 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Total PMT 16 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC 8.4.a Page: 26 Amoun 134.4( 19.2 N 23.6� 249.3( u E 3.3' o R 3.3' o L Q. 3.4( Q N 10.0, N 00 0 32.3( c 17.0E .E �a 17.0' c m E 100.1( U 186.5, r Q 208.0( 22.0`, 230.0E Page: 26 Packet Pg. 117 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254069 9/8/2022 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION (Continued) 254070 9/8/2022 075283 WAVE 254071 9/8/2022 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 9-2022 3201-1027481-01 3201-1027483-01 12907128 12907129 12907130 8.4.a Page: 27 PO # Description/Account Amoun PMT 16 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 33,533.7z PMT 16 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 3,353.3, Ui PMT 15 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC PMT 15 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC m 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 33,737.6" E PMT 15 ERPF HOUSEHOLD SUPPC R 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 3,373.7' 0 Total: 73,998.4; O IRU OP & MAIN FEE - IRU MAINTEN 'R 0 IRU Op & Main Fee - IRU Maintenanc Q. 512.000.31.518.87.48.00 304.9E Q FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF .. High Speed Internet service 09/01/22 N 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 816.0( c Total : 1,120.91 c PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES E PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 140.7, 10.5% Sales Tax c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.7E E PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 r 141.0( Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.8" PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 137.6( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.4E Page: 27 Packet Pg. 118 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.a Page: 28 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254071 9/8/2022 075635 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) Total : 463.3E 254072 9/8/2022 079087 WINDSTAR CONSTRUCTION CO ENG2019-0111 PERMIT FEE REFUND ENG2019-0111 (1001 Olympic Ave)- 001.000.257.620 2,970.0( ui Total: 2,970.0( m 254073 9/8/2022 063008 WSDOT RE 41 JZ0186 L027 E20CE/JULY 2022 PROJECT COST; t U E20CE/JULY 2022 PROJECT COST; E 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 84.0- Total: 84.01 o 254074 9/8/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI fd LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[ o 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 42.1 a 425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} Q FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA) c14 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 150.0< 00 425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCI C LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRA[ a) 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 47.5E 425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( M SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 64.4I 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 150.0< R 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI Q LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.4,1 Total : 480.71 83 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total : 419,038.91 83 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 419,038.91 Page: 28 Packet Pg. 119 vchlist 09/07/2022 2:25:37PM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 8.4.a Page: 29 Amoun a Page: 29 Packet Pg. 120 8.4.b vchlist 09/15/2022 11:34:57AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254075 9/14/2022 078466 HUSTLE BASKETBALL LLC 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Page 0 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 10893 10893 BASKETBALL SUMMER CAM 10893 BASKETBALL SUMMER CAM 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 812.0( Total: 812.0( w U Bank total : 812.0( t U Total vouchers : 812.0( E U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q Q Q N N 00 O E a V a+ C d E t V r+ Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 121 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 254076 9/15/2022 078925 425 MAGAZINE 2022-37057 TOURISM PROMOTION ADS - SEPT TOURISM PROMOTION ADS - SEPT 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 Total 254077 9/15/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC INV-2-17727 EDMONDS PD - SCINKOVEC V2 TACTICAL PANTS 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 NAME PLATE - METAL 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 INV-2-18155 EDMONDS PD - DAWKINS BIANCHI BELT 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 INV-2-18156 EDMONDS PD - SNIFFEN FLEECE & NAME TAPE - CREDIT 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 INV-2-18626 EDMONDS PD - MCARTHUR BOSTON BELT 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 V2 TACTICAL PANT 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 INV-2-18633 EDMONDS PD - ADMIN CARDIGAN - EHLERT 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 EMBROIDERY 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 8.4.c Page: 1 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 122 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254077 9/15/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 6.4' INV-2-18828 EDMONDS PD - NGUYEN JUMPSUIT W/ALTERATIONS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 358.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax U 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 36.1 E E INV-2-18896 EDMONDS PD - GILGINAS METAL NAME PLATE 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 15.0( o Freight 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 9.5( o 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.41.521.70.24.00 2.5E Q INV-2-19607 EDMONDS PD - CLERKS N CLERK POLO FOR SIZING N 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 32.6, r Freight c 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 10.0( 10.5% Sales Tax .T 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 4.41 INV-2-19621 EDMONDS PD - SNIFFEN SINGLE BREAST COAT y 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 368.9( E BULLION STARS X 12 @ 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 78.0( Q DCS STRIPING 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 31.0( 1 HR ALTERATIONS 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 12.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 49.4� INV-2-19633 EDMONDS PD - NGUYEN SAFARILAND ID PANEL W/HEATPRI Page: 2 Packet Pg. 123 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254077 9/15/2022 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 27.0( 2 EXTERNAL NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 18.0( 2 VELCRO 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 12.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 5.7; E INV-2-19637 EDMONDS PD - PETTIT ACADEMY T SHIRTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 49.9f O SWEAT PANTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 18.9� 0- SPORT TEK JERSEY SHORTS Q- a 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 39.9E Q V2 TACTICAL PANTS N 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 64.9� N BOSTON BELT T 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 23.3E c TRAFFIC TEMPLATE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 14.0( •� IRON GLOVES GRAVITY GRIP 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.9E 10.1 % Sales Tax m 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 22.3z E INV-2-20068 EDMONDS PD - INVENTORY U �a 10.1 % Sales Tax r Q 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 94.4z BELLY CHAINS X 10 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 935.0( INV-2-21681 EDMONDS PD - HAIR DANNER BOOTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 350.0( 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 35.3E Page: 3 Packet Pg. 124 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254077 9/15/2022 076040 076040 911 SUPPLY INC (Continued) Total : 3,393.61 254078 9/15/2022 073947 A WORKSAFE SERVICE INC 323167 DRUG TESTS GERRARD PRE -EMPLOYMENT 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 55.0( ui 324348 DRUG TESTS FRENCH & SEIFERT PRE-EMPLOYI 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 110.0( U Total : 165.0( •� 254079 9/15/2022 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 60888 LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SERV .� LOG CABIN - 1 BAIT STATION SERV 0 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 R 99.0( o 10.5% Sales Tax Q. 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 10.4( Q Total : 109.4( .. 254080 9/15/2022 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC 83118 LIBRARY - ANNUAL FIRE ALARM IN N LO LIBRARY - ANNUAL FIRE ALARM IN r 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 1,845.0( c 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 Total : 2,038.7; 254081 9/15/2022 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 11035 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF a: d MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF E t 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 312,352.0( u. Total: 312,352.0( Q 254082 9/15/2022 001528 AM TEST INC 129088 WWTP: SAMPLE #21-A00 SAMPLE #22-A0011349 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 125.0( 129089 WWTP: SAMPLE #21-A00 SAMPLE #22-A0012666-12671 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 300.0( 129166 WWTP: SAMPLE #22-A0011344-113 SAMPLE ##22-A0011344-11348 Page: 4 Packet Pg. 125 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254082 9/15/2022 001528 AM TEST INC (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 410.0( 129167 WWTP: SAMPLE #22-A0010670-10E SAMPLE #22-A0010670-10673 & 10, 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 240.0( Total: 1,075.0( u 254083 9/15/2022 077968 ANIMAL MEDICAL CTR OF SEATTLE 622155 CUST 234493 - EDMONDS PD - ACE t U ACE TOOTH FOLLOW UP E 001.000.41.521.26.41.00 2 613.4, U Total: 613.4: o 254084 9/15/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 24846226 WWTP: DEVIN/DAWSON/EMILYT-S > Devin, Dawson & Emily_ T-Shirts & 0 Q. 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 227.2, Q Freight .. 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 8.9� N 10.5% Sales Tax Ln 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 T 24.8( d6 Total: 261.01 N E 254085 9/15/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6560061776 WWTP: 8/31/22 UNIFORMS,TOWEL Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58.2- Rentals & Prep Charges $39.81+$4.1 t 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 43.9� 6560065528 WWTP: 9/7/22 UNIFORMS,TOWELS M Mats/Towels $52.68 + $5.53 tax @ 1 Q 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58.2- Rentals & Prep Charges $39.81+$4.1 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 43.9� Total : 204.4( 254086 9/15/2022 079111 ASHPAUGH & SCULCO CPAS PLC 22094 CONSULTANT SVCS THRU 8.31.22 COMCAST REVIEW THRU 8.31.22 001.000.39.513.40.41.00 700.0( Page: 5 Packet Pg. 126 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254086 9/15/2022 079111 ASHPAUGH & SCULCO CPAS PLC (Continued) 22095 CONSULTANT SVCS THRU 8.31.22 ZIPLY REVIEW THRU 8.31.22 001.000.39.513.40.41.00 350.0( Total: 1,050.0( ui 254087 9/15/2022 001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC INV382461 PUBLIC SAFETY - SINK FAUCET t PUBLIC SAFETY - SINK FAUCET U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 465.0( 10.25% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 47.6E o Total: 512.6( R 254088 9/15/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 124893 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS o Q. UB Outsourcing area Printing 447 Q- a 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 447 N 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 32.7E u) UB Outsourcing area Printing 447 T Q, 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 33.7( y UB Outsourcing area Postage 447 E 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 127.4( T UB Outsourcing area Postage 447 a: 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 127.3� 10.25% Sales Tax m E 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 3.3E U 10.25% Sales Tax° 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 r 3.3E a 10.25% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 3.4E EDC2207983 UB - JULY WEB ACH PROCESSING UB - JULY WEB ACH PROCESSING 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 6.2E UB - JULY WEB ACH PROCESSING 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 6.2E UB - JULY WEB ACH PROCESSING Page: 6 Packet Pg. 127 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 7 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254088 9/15/2022 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 6.2E EDC2208983 UB - AUGUST WEB ACH PROCESS UB - AUGUST WEB ACH PROCESS 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 163.7< UB - AUGUST WEB ACH PROCESS 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 163.7< UB - AUGUST WEB ACH PROCESS 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 163.7� Total : 874.1 <, 254089 9/15/2022 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 18000 SERVICE AWARDS SERVICE AWARDS 001.000.22.518.10.49.00 464.7E Total: 464.7E 254090 9/15/2022 079090 B E MEYERS & CO INC 311994 EDMONDS PD BEM MAWL X 4 - SWAT 001.000.41.521.23.35.00 11,996.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.35.00 1,259.5E Total : 13,255.5E 254091 9/15/2022 002100 BARNARD, EARL 42 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 001.000.39.517.20.23.20 286.7� Total : 286.71 254092 9/15/2022 076338 BECK, JAMES SEPT 2022 CDL RENEWAL CDL RENEWAL 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 136.0( Total : 136.0( 254093 9/15/2022 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 830355 UNIT 25 - PARTS/ GLASS UNIT 25 - PARTS/ GLASS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 210.0E Page: 7 Packet Pg. 128 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254093 9/15/2022 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 254094 9/15/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 254095 9/15/2022 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 8 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 10.25% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.5< 830543 UNIT 62 - PARTS/ LATCH UNIT 62 - PARTS/ LATCH 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 20.9z 10.25% Sales Tax U 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.1E E 830701 UNIT 54 - PARTS/ COVER UNIT 54 - PARTS/ COVER 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 26.8( O 10.25% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.7,' o 830759 UNIT 62 - PARTS/ LATCH Q- UNIT 62 - PARTS/ LATCH a Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 20.9z N 10.25% Sales Tax N 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.1E r Total : 307.3z c 1361631 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 512.90 GF E FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 512.90 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,147.5" 1362899 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 639.10 GF FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 639.10 GF m E 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,363.1 z U Total : 2,510.6E r Q 24280 ONCALL STMWATER AUGUST 2022 ONCALL STMWATER AUGUST 2022 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 10,474.7E 24325 E22JA/SERVICES THRU 8.27.2022 E22JA/SERVICES THRU 8.27.2022 421.000.74.594.34.41.00 14,550.5( Total : 25,025.2E Page: 8 Packet Pg. 129 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 9 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254096 9/15/2022 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 1072772 EOFA/BID DOCS PUBLISHING EOFA/BID DOCS PUBLISHING 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 56.6( Total: 56.6( .. 254097 9/15/2022 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 5857324 ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP N ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 448.7� U E 5857603 ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP ROADWAY -ASPHALT, LIQUID ASP 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 267.3, o Total: 716.1: R 254098 9/15/2022 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 95595442 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA o Q. STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA Q 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 10.1 % Sales Tax N 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 16.4 � u) 95597275 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA T d6 STREET - 5.5 SK 3/8 AEA 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 N 162.9( E 10.1 % Sales Tax M 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 16.4, Total: 358.7' c d 254099 9/15/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 29163970 ENGINEERING COPIER 9.2022 t ENGINEERING COPIER 9.2022 @ 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 253.4E Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 26.6" 29163971 DEV SVCS COPIER CONTRACT Monthly copier contract charge- 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 217.4 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 22.8' Page: 9 Packet Pg. 130 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher 254099 254100 254101 Voucher List City of Edmonds Date Vendor Invoice 9/15/2022 073029 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 9/15/2022 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC CN21759 CN31314 CQ63462 CR26263 SE2203508 9/15/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY CG117037 LY322042 8.4.c Page: 10 PO # Description/Account Amoun Total : 520.3E CISCO SMART NET TOTAL CARE Cisco Smart Net Total Care extended 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 630.9( ui 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 66.2z CISCO DIGITAL NETWORK ARCHIT U Cisco 3 yr Digital Network Architectur, E 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 929.6E Z 10.5% Sales Tax o 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 97.6" —R CISCO SMART NET TOTAL CARE 0 Cisco Smart Net Total Care extended 0. 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 630.9( Q 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 66.2z N VMWARE CARBON BLACK EP ADV r VMware Carbon Black cloud endpoini Q, 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 15,780.0( N 10.5% Sales Tax E 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 1,656.9( 12 PALO ALTO COMPUTER SERVICES Professional Services Palo Alto Proje, 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 550.0( E 10.5% Sales Tax U 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 47.2E r Total : 20,455.71 Q PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE PM: YOST POOL CARBON DIOXIDE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 165.5z 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 17.3� WATER - SUPPLIES/ CARBON DIO> WATER - SUPPLIES/ CARBON DIO> Page: 10 Packet Pg. 131 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 254101 9/15/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total : 254102 9/15/2022 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS 264543 EOMA/PERMIT BLD2022-1008 EOMA/PERMIT BLD2022-1008 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 EOMA/PERMIT BLD2022-1008 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 Total 254103 9/15/2022 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 9056920000 WWTP: 7/12-8/8/22 FLOWMETER 8' FLOW METER #879026 @ 2203 N 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 Total 254104 9/15/2022 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC SEPT-2022 254105 9/15/2022 078902 COLEMAN OIL COMPANY LLC 2209-047395 C/A CITYOFED00001 Sept-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 Total FLEET - FUEL/ DIESEL & REGULAR REG FUEL 8,000 GALLONS 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 DELIVERY FEE 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 DELIVERY FEE 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 DIESEL 2,000 GALLONS 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 8.4.c Page: 11 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 132 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 12 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254105 9/15/2022 078902 078902 COLEMAN OIL COMPANY LLC (Continued) Total : 40,332.6, 254106 9/15/2022 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC RO47659 UNIT 286 - REPAIR DAMAGES (DEC UNIT 286 - REPAIR DAMAGES (DEC 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 1,000.0( Total : 1,000.0( 254107 9/15/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310301175191 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 143.9E Total: 143.9E 254108 9/15/2022 074444 DATAQUEST LLC 19195 BACKGROUND CHECKS - AUGUST AUGUST BACKGROUND CHECKS 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 490.0( WWTP BACKGROUND CHECK OVE 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 30.0( Tota I : 520.0( 254109 9/15/2022 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 512897 TO 22-01/SERVICES THRU 6.11.22 TO 22-01/SERVICES THRU 6.11.22 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 666.8( Total : 666.8E 254110 9/15/2022 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2022080028 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098 Scan Services for August 2022 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 285.0( Total : 285.0( 254111 9/15/2022 076172 DK SYSTEMS 31951 FIRE STATION 17 - LABOR FIRE STATION 17 - LABOR 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 187.5( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 19.6� Tota I : 207.11 254112 9/15/2022 007253 DUNN LUMBER 8898126 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - SUF Page: 12 Packet Pg. 133 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254112 9/15/2022 007253 DUNN LUMBER (Continued) MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - SUF 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 18.4 10.6% Sales Tax -71 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.9E 8907775 PUBLIC SAFETY- SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY- SUPPLIES m 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 113.1' E 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 _M 11.6E 8913511 FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE SUPPLIES O FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 303.7z o 10.6% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 32.1 Q Total: 481.1, N N 254113 9/15/2022 007625 EDMONDS ARTS FESTIVAL TPA EAF TPA EDMONDS ARTS FESTIVAL LO r TPA EDMONDS ARTS FESTIVAL d6 123.000.64.573.20.41.40 0 2,500.0( y Total: 2,500.0( E 70 254114 9/15/2022 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 00010129093 CEMETERY SUPPLIES: ENGINE 011 10.5% Sales Tax c 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 3.6, E CEMETERY SUPPLIES: ENGINE 011 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 34.9E° Total : r 38.6E Q 254115 9/15/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 3271 PM: POOL FILTERS PM: POOL FILTERS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 59.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.3( 3278 LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES/ WOOD PU LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES/ WOOD PU Page: 13 Packet Pg. 134 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 254115 9/15/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3279 PM: ICE PM: ICE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3280 PM: ICE PM: ICE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 254116 9/15/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 5-00080 5-10351 254117 9/15/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR228521 AR228795 AR228887 Total ; IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 INTERURBAN TRAIL INTERURBAN TRAIL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total ENGINEERING COPIER 9.2022 ENGINEERING COPIER 9.2022 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 CANON 2501 OVERAGE bw overage 8/2022 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 clr overage 8/2022 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02 Maintenance 08/21/22 - 09/20/22 Car 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 8.4.c Page: 14 Amoun N m 29.9( E 14.9,1 125.6 o R 0 L Q. 56.3E Q N N 61.2z r 117.6: d6 0 N E M 131.5E c 13.8- E t U �a 1.4' Q 19.1< 2.1 E 307.2( Page: 14 Packet Pg. 135 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254117 9/15/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 254118 9/15/2022 069469 ENNIS-FLINT INC 254119 9/15/2022 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 254120 9/15/2022 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 254121 9/15/2022 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY PO # Description/Account 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total ; 268724 TRAFFIC - WHITE LINES & LEFTAF TRAFFIC - WHITE LINES & LEFTAF 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total 0168268-IN EDMONDS PD CORPORAL BADGE REFURBISHEC 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 SERGEANT BADGE REFURBISHED 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 PACKING INSURANCE & HANDLINC 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Total EDH961972 PLANNING - ADVERTISING Notification of City Application- 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 EDH962156 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BD2 DE; Public hearing notice BD2 zone desig 001.000.31.514.31.41.40 Total WAEVE191363 WWTP: PO 886 HCS 9/16-12 X 3.5 HCS 9/16-12 x 3.5 Z5 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 8.4.c Page: 15 Page: 15 Packet Pg. 136 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 16 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254121 9/15/2022 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 0.1 � WAEVE191454 WWTP: PO 886 9/16-12X3-1/2TPBT( PO 886 9/16-12X3-1/2TPBTG5Z 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 24.1 � 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 2.5z Total : 28.7E 254122 9/15/2022 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1101592-2 WATER - SUPPLIES/ LIDS WATER - SUPPLIES/ LIDS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 3,888.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 408.2z Total: 4,296.2z 254123 9/15/2022 078226 GEIGLE SAFETY GROUP INC 220906-004C WWTP: GMOORE OSHACADEMY S GMOORE OSHACADEMY SAFETY C 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 190.3- Total : 190.31 254124 9/15/2022 074358 GEO-TEST SERVICES 49495 E21 FD/SERVICES THRU 8.28.22 E21 FD/SERVICES THRU 8.28.22 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 2,382.0( Total : 2,382.0( 254125 9/15/2022 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 0000035408 FLEET - TIRES FLEET - TIRES 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 1,169.8( WA STATE TIRE TAX FEE 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 8.0( 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 124.0( Total : 1,301.8( 254126 9/15/2022 012199 GRAINGER 9411742068 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ V-BEI Page: 16 Packet Pg. 137 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254126 9/15/2022 012199 GRAINGER (Continued) PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ V-BEI 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.4< Total: 15.0E 254127 9/15/2022 076462 GREAT FLOORS LLC JB22-139665 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - SUF MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - SUF 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 238.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 25.0 , Tota I : 263.8 , 254128 9/15/2022 078424 GREEN LATRINE INC 124709 UPTOWN MARKET LATRINE SERVI, UPTOWN MARKET LATRINE SERVI, 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 3,450.0( Total : 3,450.0( 254129 9/15/2022 079112 HIGHWAY SPECIALTIES LLC 0003821-IN E202SO - SOLAR TECH MESSAGE E202SO - SOLAR TECH MESSAGE 111.000.68.594.42.64.00 18,600.0( Freight 111.000.68.594.42.64.00 750.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.594.42.64.00 2,031.7E 0003851-CM E202SO - PARTS NOT RECEIVED E202SO - PARTS NOT RECEIVED 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 -500.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 -52.5( Total: 20,829.2E 254130 9/15/2022 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 43 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 44.3E Page: 17 Packet Pg. 138 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 18 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254130 9/15/2022 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT (Continued) REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 3,292.& Total: 3,337.2 , 254131 9/15/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1011615 FIRE STATION 20 - SUPPLIES FIRE STATION 20 - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 31.3, 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.2' 1011624 LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES LOG CABIN - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 43.8E 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.5, 1073511 WATER - SUPPLIES WATER - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 175.6z 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 18.0� 1090021 SEWER - SUPPLIES SEWER - SUPPLIES 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 19.7z 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.0< 15778 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ CLEA PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES/ CLEA 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.1- 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.2, 2030148 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 85.9E 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.8� 2231506 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES RETURNED Page: 18 Packet Pg. 139 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254131 9/15/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 19 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) F.A.C. - SUPPLIES RETURNED 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 -54.9 10.3% Sales Tax -71 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 -5.6E u) 4015182 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES/ WASHERS F.A.C. - SUPPLIES/ WASHERS m 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.3E E 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 _M 0.9E 4514339 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ HAMMER O TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ HAMMER 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 65.9z o 10.3% Sales Tax a 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 6.7� Q 7024279 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES N FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 55.6E r 10.3% Sales Tax c 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.7< 7024281 PIBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES E PIBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 81.2f 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.3 � E 7520286 F.A.C. - SUPPLIES (RETURNED) U F.A.C. - SUPPLIES (RETURNED) r 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 54.9, Q 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.6E 8521900 FISHING PIER - SUPPLIES FISHING PIER - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 179.9' 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 18.5, Page: 19 Packet Pg. 140 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254131 9/15/2022 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 254132 9/15/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0552810927 0552810928 0552810929 0552810930 0552810931 0552810932 0552810933 0552928306 0552928307 0552928308 0552928309 0552928310 8.4.c Page: 20 PO # Description/Account Amoun Total : 828.1, SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4E ui MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1,514.1, U WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 240.3E o HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC 'R HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC 0 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 346.0( Q. HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET Q HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 644.9� N PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE LO PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE T c6 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4E N YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET E YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 439.6( SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET c SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4.' u MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED Q 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1,514.1 , YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 203.5E WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 240.3E HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC Page: 20 Packet Pg. 141 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 21 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254132 9/15/2022 061013 HONEY BUCKET (Continued) HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 346.0( 0552928311 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 644.9� 0552928312 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 439.6( 0552928313 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE o 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 120.4.' 'R 0552986525 MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED o MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED a 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1,514.1 , Q 0552986528 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET N N 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 644.9� r Total : 9,214.51 c 254133 9/15/2022 071642 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 14680 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 8.25.22 N E E20CE/SERVICES THRU 8.25.22 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 2,774.2' 14701 PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( PARK PLANNING SUPPORT SERVI( E 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 780.2' Total : 3,554.4: r Q 254134 9/15/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC U2216036547 WATER INVENTORY - 4" RESETTEF WATER INVENTORY - 4" RESETTEF 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,976.2E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 207.5 U2216043036 WATER INVENTORY - 7" RESETTEF WATER INVENTORY - 7" RESETTEF 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 3,662.4( Page: 21 Packet Pg. 142 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 22 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254134 9/15/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 384.5E Total: 6,230.7E 254135 9/15/2022 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10104548 FLEET - SUPPLIES/ PLASTIC PLUG FLEET - SUPPLIES/ PLASTIC PLUG 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 61.4z 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 6.4E Total : 67.W 254136 9/15/2022 076917 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC W3Y0200016 WWTP: PROF SERVICES THRU 8/2 PROF SERVICES THRU 8/26/22 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 427.0( Total : 427.0( 254137 9/15/2022 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 7170 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC Sept-2022 Fiber Optics Internet 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 590.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 61.9E Total: 651.9E 254138 9/15/2022 075265 KBA INC 3007003 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 9.12.22 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 9.12.22 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 30,764.2z EOMA/SERVICES THRU 9.12.22 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 9,189.3, Total: 39,953.5E 254139 9/15/2022 062477 KEEP POSTED 23720 BIRD FEST POSTER DISTRIBUTIOI` BIRD FEST POSTER DISTRIBUTIOI` 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 255.0( Tota I : 255.0( 254140 9/15/2022 066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC 12065 FLEET - REPLACEMENT MOUNT KI Page: 22 Packet Pg. 143 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 23 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254140 9/15/2022 066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC (Continued) FLEET - REPLACEMENT MOUNT KI 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 129.6( Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.9� 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.0E Tota I : 158.6 , 254141 9/15/2022 078500 LEFTA SYSTEMS INV-001143 EDMONDS PD LEFTA ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION & E 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 6,180.0( Total : 6,180.0( 254142 9/15/2022 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING 4760941 S185 ACCT#2185-952778-814 2ND & DAY 2nd & Dayton shredding- 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 194.5( Total : 194.5( 254143 9/15/2022 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 5126600 PM SUPPLIES: GASKET, AIR CLEAT PM SUPPLIES: GASKET, AIR CLEAT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.8, 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.0� Total : 21.9E 254144 9/15/2022 078913 MAINTENANCE SERVICES LLC 12778 FLEET - FUEL ISLAND REPAIRS FLEET - FUEL ISLAND REPAIRS 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 807.2( 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 84.7E Total : 892.0: 254145 9/15/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 380998 STREET - GATORLINE STREET - GATORLINE 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 39.9E Page: 23 Packet Pg. 144 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 24 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254145 9/15/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 4.2( 381441 STREET - GATORLINE STREET - GATORLINE 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 39.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 4.2( 381959 STREET -PARTS STREET -PARTS 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 4.9F 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 0.5, 382026 SEWER - DRILL RENTAL SEWER - DRILL RENTAL 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 134.4( 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 14.1 Total : 242.3 , 254146 9/15/2022 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 378766 WATER - PARTS WATER - PARTS 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 42.2< 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 4.41' 381090 WATER - PARTS WATER - PARTS 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 56.4: 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 5.9: Total : 109.0: 254147 9/15/2022 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0807910-IN FLEET - FILTERS FLEET - FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 66.8� 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 24 Packet Pg. 145 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254147 9/15/2022 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued) 254148 9/15/2022 077628 NW CORROSION ENGINEERING LLC 2647 254149 9/15/2022 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 76034124 76115710 76414885 254150 9/15/2022 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 257707635002 254151 9/15/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER August, 2022 8.4.c Page: 25 PO # Description/Account Amoun 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 7.0' Total : 73.8E GENERAL ENG SVCS - WATER ui GENERAL ENG SVCS - WATER 001.000.67.518.21.41.00 3,511.6' t Total: 3,511.61 DRUG TEST BRADLEY DRUG TEST o 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 76.0( -R DRUG TEST o HALE - DRUG TEST Q. 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 76.0( < DOT RECERTIFICATION ROCHFORD RE-CERT N 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 110.0( u) Total : 262.0(' 0 INV 257707635002 ACCT 90520437 N E PW - SUPPLIES/ NOTE PADS 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 22.8E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.4( E Total : 25.2E t U COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI` �a r Emergency Medical Services & Traun Q 001.000.237.120 776.0' PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 18,123.8E Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 676.5( State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 86.1, Page: 25 Packet Pg. 146 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254151 9/15/2022 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 254152 9/15/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 0001520 0001530 0002930 PO # Description/Account Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 Accessible Communities Acct 001.000.237.290 Multi -Model Transportation 001.000.237.300 Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 Distracted Driving Prevention Acct 001.000.237.380 Motor Vehicle Acct 001.000.237.440 Congestion Relief Traffic Safety Acct 001.000.237.430 Total PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S1 PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S\ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 8.4.c Page: 26 Amoun 3,647.5 169.0( m 1,553.5� u E 762.9� 'R 99.9c o �a 99.9c o Q. a 393.3� Q N 488.8E LO T 0.0E o N 37.5( •� 12.5( 26,927.9E t U �a 23.8E Q 100.1' Page: 26 Packet Pg. 147 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 27 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254152 9/15/2022 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (Continued) SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 116.1, 0026390 PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 26.2� Tota I : 334.9' 254153 9/15/2022 072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3685-228359 UNIT 29 - PARTS/ PCV TUBE UNIT 29 - PARTS/ PCV TUBE 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 14.2, 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.4� 3685-228499 UNIT 14 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER UNIT 14 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 45.1 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.7, Total : 65.55 254154 9/15/2022 002203 OW EN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00107616 UNIT 47 - PARTS UNIT 47 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 266.4< Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.1 E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 29.5E Total : 311.1 <, 254155 9/15/2022 026830 PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY 51109444 PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 39.2E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.1 , Total : 43.3 , Page: 27 Packet Pg. 148 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 28 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254156 9/15/2022 075130 PATRICK DOHERTY PROF SVCS 2-2022 SERVICES THRU AUGUST 2022 SERVICES THRU AUGUST 2022 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 2,756.0( Total: 2,756.0( .. 254157 9/15/2022 074793 PETDATA INC 11024 AUG - EDMONDS PD N AUG PET LICENSE FEES 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 141.1( U Total : 141.1( 254158 9/15/2022 008475 PETTY CASH 1/6/22 - 9/7/22 1/6/22 - 9/7/22 PW PETTY CASH STORM - TOD MOLES PUMP FUSE o 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 R 7.2E o STREET - SKYLAR MERBACK - CDL Q. 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 136.0( Q WATER - JEFF KOBYLK - BLEACH E 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 25.9E N PW - CHELSEA MERRITT - SUPPLIE U) 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 T 19.8 1 SEWER - SCOTT WESTON - TARP t N 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 37.0( E STREET/ STORM SUPPLIES MIKE J 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 16.8( SEWER - DAVID LEDER - ANTI-FOC 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 m 12.1 E E STREET - BILL SANDERS - CDL REI U 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 136.0( r Total : 391.0E Q 254159 9/15/2022 064167 POLLARD WATER 0220651 WATER - SUPPLIES/ MAGNET WATER - SUPPLIES/ MAGNET 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 147.6( Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 14.9E 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 17.0 , Page: 28 Packet Pg. 149 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 29 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254159 9/15/2022 064167 064167 POLLARD WATER (Continued) Total : 179.6: 254160 9/15/2022 079069 POST CREATIVE COLLECTIVE September 12, 2022 ARPA GRANTS ADMINISTRATION ARPA Grants Administration 08/29/22 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 4,095.0( ui Total: 4,095.0( m 254161 9/15/2022 076909 POWER DMS INC INV-23356 CUSTA-5565 - EDMONDS PD t U POWERTIME SET UP E 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 2,300.0( POWER TIME YEARLY SUBSCRIPT o 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 3,000.0( R 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 556.5( Q. Total : 5,856.5( Q 254162 9/15/2022 075822 QUADIENT INC 16783757 SURE SEAL FOR POSTAGE MACHII Sure Seal 1 gallon bottle N LO 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 24.7( r 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 2.5� E Total 254163 9/15/2022 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 41632 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-RAI INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-RAI 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( E 41633 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-TAI U �a INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-TAI r Q 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( 41634 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-RIN INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-RIN 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( 41635 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-KRI INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-KRI 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( 41785 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-MII` Page: 29 Packet Pg. 150 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254163 9/15/2022 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC (Continued) INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-MIS 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( 41786 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-HAI INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-HAI 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( 41904 MARKER/INSCRIPTION-MILLS MARKER/INSCRIPTION-MILLS 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 225.0( Total : 1,575.0( 254164 9/15/2022 079109 RAPP, JULIE PLN2022-0008 PERMIT FEE REFUND PLN 2022-0008 001.000.257.620 625.0( Tota I : 625.0( 254165 9/15/2022 068657 ROBERT HALF 60437984 TEMP HELP WE 7/22/22 - OGSTON WE 7/22 - OGSTON 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2,310.0( 60566387 TEMP HELP WE 8/12/22 - OGSTON 8/12/22 - OGSTON 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2,310.0( 60635313 TEMP HELP WE 8/26 - OGSTON WE 8/26 - OGSTON 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2,223.3E 60679068 TEMP HELP WE 9/2/22 - OGSTON WE 9/2 - OGSTON 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 2,223.3E Total: 9,066.7E 254166 9/15/2022 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-037667 UNIT 25 - BATTERY UNIT 25 - BATTERY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 252.6F 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 26.5: 5-037769 UNIT 75 - BATTERY Page: 30 Packet Pg. 151 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 31 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254166 9/15/2022 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC (Continued) UNIT 75 - BATTERY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 126.3z 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.2, Total: 418.8, 254167 9/15/2022 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 653335 ACCT 1773 - EDMONDS PD 223 55GR AMMO 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 6,580.8( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 690.9E 653366 CUST 1733 - EMONDS PD TRAINING AMMO 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 1,695.0( AR 15 TRAINING BOLT 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 1,788.0( Freight 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 46.1 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 370.5E Total : 11,171.4", 254168 9/15/2022 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 235272-1 UNIT 120 - VACTOR TRUCK GUN W UNIT 120 - VACTOR TRUCK GUN W 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 689.9E Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.8' 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 74.1- Total : 779.8$ 254169 9/15/2022 066918 SEDOR, NORMAN 44 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 6,000.0( Page: 31 Packet Pg. 152 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254169 9/15/2022 066918 066918 SEDOR, NORMAN 254170 9/15/2022 079110 SHEA, SARAH 254171 9/15/2022 075590 SMARSH INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 08232022 INV-44700 254172 9/15/2022 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 3815 254173 9/15/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 PO # Description/Account Total UPTOWN EVENING MARKET PERF UPTOWN EVENING MARKET PERF 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total VERIZON - MG CLOUD MT ANNUAL Verizon - MG Cloud MT Annual Servi( 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 Total PUBLIC DEFENSE CONTRACT - AU AUGUST CONTRACT 001.000.39.515.93.41.00 Total 200650851 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200651644 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201383270 CITY PARK GAZEBO CITY PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202114484 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 221732084 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 222704272 WWTP: 8/4- 9/2/22 FLOWMETER 1C 8/4- 9/2/22 FLOW METER 2400 HIG 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 Tota I : 8.4.c Page: 32 Amoun 6,000.0( -71 800.0( y 800.0( m t U E 21.8E 21.8E o R 0 35,918.8( a 35,918.8( N N LO T 69.6' c N E 682.3( U �a r 88.1( Q 103.3E 22.2E 987.1 S Page: 32 Packet Pg. 153 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254174 9/15/2022 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 82265 254175 9/15/2022 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER August 2022 254176 9/15/2022 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE 254177 9/15/2022 076324 SUPERION LLC PO # Description/Account PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 ILLEGAL DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Total Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 Total L150101 08-2022 AUDIT FEES 08-2022 Audit Fees 001.000.39.514.20.41.50 08-2022 Audit Fees 111.000.68.543.30.41.50 08-2022 Audit Fees 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 08-2022 Audit Fees 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 08-2022 Audit Fees 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 Total 332402 PROF SVCS Trakit Community Development- 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 362869 TRAKIT ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FE Trakit Annual Maintenance Fee - 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 362913 SUPERION FUSION ANNUAL MAIN1 Superion Fusion Annual Maintenance 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 8.4.c Page: 33 Amoun 1,332.0( 5.0( Ui 1,337.0( t U E M 395.2 1 Z 395.21, o �a 0 L Q. 14,281.3� Q 1,428.1 z N LO T 4,284.4, c6 0 N 4,284.4, E 4,284.4( 28,562.71, r- E t U M 8,400.0( Q 43,804.5, 4,599.4( 3,588.6, Page: 33 Packet Pg. 154 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 8.4.c Page: 34 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254177 9/15/2022 076324 SUPERION LLC (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 376.8- Total : 60,769.4' 254178 9/15/2022 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 180025902-03 STREET - LAWN RAKE STREET- LAWN RAKE 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 16.4, 10.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 1.7- Total : 18.1; 254179 9/15/2022 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 97252 FAC MAINT - SCREEN PRINTING FAC MAINT - SCREEN PRINTING 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 58.2E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 6.1 , Total : 64.3 254180 9/15/2022 075649 TEITZEL, DAVE sep2022 REIMBURSE FOR COUNCIL SUPPL Case for iphone SE/ screen protector 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 84.9E Total : 84.9E 254181 9/15/2022 078744 THE PUBLIC RESTROOM COMPANY 23301 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 8.31.22 EOMA/SERVICES THRU 8.31.22 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 74,462.0E EOMA/SERVICES THRU 8.31.22 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 22,241.9, Total: 96,704.0( 254182 9/15/2022 076724 TODD & CHRISTINA FLYNN PLN2022-0059 PERMIT FEE REFUND PLN2022-0059- 001.000.257.620 465.0( Tota I : 465.0( 254183 9/15/2022 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 286148 STORM - DUMP FEES Page: 34 Packet Pg. 155 vchlist 09/15/2022 9:26:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 254183 9/15/2022 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER (Continued) 254184 254185 254186 9/15/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 287039 9914733526 9/15/2022 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 0060045-2588-4 9/15/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 111 Vouchers for bank code: usbank 111 Vouchers in this report 425-776-5316 8.4.c Page: 35 PO # Description/Account Amoun STORM - DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 664.6E PARKS - CLEAN BRUSH PARKS - CLEAN BRUSH 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 348.9E Total : 1,013.6: C/A 442201730-00001 E iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 35.1 o Dayton St Stormwater Pump Station 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 27.1 z o Total: 62.2E Q. a Q WWTP: 8/2022 WASTE PICKUPS 8/2022 WASTE PICKUPS N 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 182,499.1 � r Total : 182,499.1 , 0 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII N 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 _E 118.9- Total : 118.91 m Bank total : 1,032,232.W E U Total vouchers : 1,032,232.& Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 156 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Title 175th St. SW Slope StabilizatiopA& 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project 2019 MIN 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Khimhor Khimhor E21FB c560 EBGA c516 SW R EBFC EBJA c523 WTR 2019 Utilitv Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES P019 Waterline Overlay 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 19 20 Guardrail Installations z 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 STR E R2020 Pedestria EODB SML ° 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STR 4- ° ffic Calming o 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 STR a Q- a r020 Waterline Overlay i053 N N 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 STR Lh 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i062 STR a1 Seweriverlay Program 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21CD i061 STM affic Calming 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR 1022 Guardrail Program 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 STR n Safety 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 STR 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 STR 022 Traffic Calming Program 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES bL022 Waterline Overlay Program 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STR 1023 Sewer2verla 076 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM 23 Waterline Overlay Prograrr1llllllllllllllll i075 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 STR 6th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 157 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) 8.4.d Project Title 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th aCurb Ramps Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossinq Ilinger Regional Facility PrdVesign Engineering Project Khimhor EBCA E 1 CA Project Accounting Funding Number i029 STR c368 STR EBCC i031 STR E9DA i040 STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 STR Ltywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 ASWIN 0 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 STR Ltvwmd PrntPc tPct/PPrmissivP Traffic Signal Conversio FA-AE .2 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 PRK 0 yfield (Desig r EOMA 4- ° Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR o Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4 c455 a Q- a Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 FAC N N Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Ln T Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR c 1 D i058 TR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 WTR E OMER wy 99 Gateway Revitalizati c L Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 STR a- m wy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th)21 w Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 STM Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study le Creek Restoration Minor Sidewalk Program PDES (Students Saving Salmon)' Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update IrVD Slope Repair & Stabilization W E4GC c461 SW R SM E6DD EONA Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC Perrinville Creek Recovery Stud IIIIIIIII. M E21 FC Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Prof �nnual Water Utility Replace i017 s025 m 105 c552 s028 STR GF 1W STM STM STM E22GA c566 SW R Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 hase 13 Waterline Replacement Project Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 WTR WTR STM Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 158 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Title Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Numher Numher Phase 3 Storm Utility ReplacemeWroject E21 FD c563 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 STM 6se 8 An I OGA Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 SWR W Concrete Regrade & Drainage Sou E9MA Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services eaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 SR-104 Adaptive System 236th-226th SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) Standard Details Updates nwater Sunset Walkway Improvements tility Funds reserve Policies Study Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 GB c562 SW R E22CG i069 STR Y 0 CD TR ESNA solo UTILITIES E MML -2 E1 DA c354 STR o s029 0 a E7MA c544 PRK Q- a c496 N E7MA m103 PRK Ln T 4FC I STM c EOJB s026 WTR E22JB m160 WTR E E21 FA c556 PRK Z Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 159 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Engineering Project Title Project Number L020 Guardrail Installations 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades 2020 Overlay Program 12020 Waterline Ova 2020 Pedestrian Task Force 020 Pedestrian Safety Program Project Accounting Funding Number i046 EOAB i047 STR i048 EOCA i042 STR EODA s024 STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB al Sewer Replace Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project NOR EOJA ost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA rvic Center Playfield (Construction EOMA Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 1C i05O STR Y d z c547 STM E .2 c549 WTR ° R o a c536 PRK Q- a c551 UNE&L N s025 G F c368 VVSTR Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 STR a Ave Overlay (196 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 STR rrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements 2021 Traffic Calming 1021 Guardrail Installations 2021 Overlay Program t021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 AA E21 CA 21CB c552 i056 STR i051 STR WTR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i06O SW R j?021 Stormwater Overlay Progra- Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 STR F-021 Pedestrian Task Force Mop" Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 PRK 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization wow E21 FB Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM t Replacemel qW1FD Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 STM I Sewer Replacement Project E21GA c559 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SW R 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA =MWhase WT Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 160 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) 8.4.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 STIR 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 STIR 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 STIR 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 STIR 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 STIR 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 STIR 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 STIR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 STIR Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 STIR SR-104 Adaptive System 236th-226th E22CG i069 STR 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 STIR Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 STM Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 STM Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 SWR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STIR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SWR 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 STM Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 SWR Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 FAC Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study E5GB sol l SWR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) E5J13 c482 WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating E5KA c473 WTR Standard Details Updates E5NA solo UTILITIES Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 STIR Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 STIR Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 STM Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 SWR ui U m U E U 0 0 L Q a Q Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 161 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Project Title Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Engineering Project Numher Project Accounting Funding Numher E7DC i026 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM NPDES (Students aving a mon) ML6.. 7FG 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR Development & Restoration (Design) c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 PRK aterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 220th Adaptive E8AB i028 STR Lth Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th E8CC i031 STR TR 2019 Storm Maintenance Project 019 Sewerline Replacement Project 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement 1019 Utility Rate & GFC Update 2019 Traffic Calmi Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E8FC c525 E8JA E9AA E9CB E9DA E9FA E9MA c523 i038 i043 i040 s022 c502 STM SWR WTR UTILITIES STR 1W STR STM FAC 4 Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 162 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 8.4.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1 CA c368 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Funding STM STR STR STM STM FAC STM SWR WTR WTR SWR PRK WTR FAC SWR WTR STM PRK PRK STM STM SWR WTR PRK STM PRK WTR SWR STM WTR SWR STM STM WTR SWR STM STR ui U m U E U 0 0 L Q a Q Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 163 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 8.4.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21 AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 CB i059 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive System 236th-226th E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 Funding STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR SWR STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ui U m U E U 0 0 L Q a Q Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 164 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 8.4.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STIR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SWR 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 STM Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 PRK OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB sol l SWR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 STR Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 STM 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s02O UTILITIES Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 STM 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STIR Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GF Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s03O UTILITIES ui U m U E U 0 0 L Q Q Q Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 165 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 8.4.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1CA c368 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Funding FAC FAC GF PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ui U m U E U 0 0 L Q Q Q Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 166 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 8.4.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E91DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21 AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive System 236th-226th E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Funding STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR ui U m t U E U 0 0 L Q a Q Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 167 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 8.4.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21CC i060 SWR 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB sol l SWR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s02O UTILITIES Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s03O UTILITIES Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR ui U m U E U 0 0 L Q Q Q Revised 8/23/2022 Packet Pg. 168 8.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Resolution of Appreciation to Councilmember Laura Johnson Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Laura Johnson was elected to Edmonds City Council in November 2019 and served as a Councilmember until September 13, 2022. Recommendation N/A Narrative Today we thank Councilmember Laura Johnson for her contributions to the City of Edmonds. Attachments: Resolution of Appreciation - LJohnson Packet Pg. 169 8.5.a RESOLUTION NO. XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL THANKING COUNCILMEMBER LAURA JOHNSON FOR HER SERVICE TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Laura Johnson was sworn into office on January 7, 2020 to serve a four-year term; she served one year as Council President Pro Tem; and WHEREAS, during her tenure, she embraced the work of the City Council with passion and compassion, and steadfast dedication to Edmonds citizens, City staff, and community leaders; and WHEREAS, during her term, Councilmember Laura Johnson approached her duties diligently — apprising herself of all the facts and ensuring that the Council as a body had all the relevant information needed to make informed decisions; and WHEREAS, she helped to see the completion of the following: Advocated for and supported a Human and Social Services program to serve Edmonds' most vulnerable residents; Supported the HASCO resolution to support affordable housing; Advocated and lobbied for the redevelopment of Highway 99; Provided significant contributions to the Development Tree Code; Developed the Council Code of Conduct; Advocated for equitable distribution of resources, focusing on neighborhoods outside the Bowl Suicide Prevention Month — 2 years; Supported the development of a community center in So. Edmonds/Lk Ballinger neighborhood; Supported ongoing access to Reproductive Healthcare; Supported and passed budgets which prioritized people and the environment; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Laura Johnson was involved with many committees and commissions on behalf of the City of Edmonds including: LEOFF Disability Board; Mayors Climate Protection Committee; Seashore Transportation Forum; Edmonds Lodging Tax Commission; Youth Commission Liaison — 2 years; Affordable Housing Alliance; Lake Ballinger Regional Workgroup; and WRIA 8 alternate; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Councilmember Laura Johnson be applauded and thanked for her service to City Council. RESOLVED this 20th day of September 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON MAYOR, MIKE NELSON 1 Packet Pg. 170 8.5.a ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. September 16, 2022 September 20, 2022 xxxx 2 Packet Pg. 171 8.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Opioid Settlement Allocation Agreement Staff Lead: Sharon Cates, Lighthouse Law Group Department: City Attorney's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History In May 2022, the City Council approved the Mayor's signature on the "One Washington Memorandum of Understanding Between Washington Municipalities" (MOU) to opt the City in to the settlement of certain opioid lawsuits brought by Washington State against the three major opioid distributors and other entities involved in the pharmaceutical supply chain that manufacture and dispense prescription opioids. In June 2022, the City Council approved the Mayor's signature on the Subdivision Settlement Participation Form, which was provided to the Attorney General's Office as requested as an additional document required to allow the City to participate in the opioid settlement. The next, and final, step in this process for which the City Council has already given conceptual approval is to approve the filing with the State of a signed Allocation Agreement. The Agreement was reviewed in the PSPHSP Committee on September 13 and recommended for approval on the consent agenda. Recommendation Approval of Mayor's signature on and filing of Allocation Agreement on consent agenda. Narrative The State has reached an agreement in principle to settle its lawsuit against the three opioid distributors for $518 Million. The State Attorney General's Office requires that a sufficient number of local jurisdictions agree to all of the terms of the settlement before it can be finalized. The City has already provided signatures to the AG's Office for the MOU and the Subdivision Settlement Participation Form. The attached Allocation Agreement is between the State and local governments and: (a) provides more details on the distribution of funds obtained from the settling opioid distributors; (b) makes some amendments to the MOU; and (c) includes some additional requirements on local governments' participation in the settlement. The Allocation Agreement provides that the funds from the opioid settlement that must be used for opioid abuse remediation and abatement activities ("Abatement Amount") will be distributed 50% to the State and 50% to local governments according to the formula in set forth in the MOU, as amended by the Agreement. The maximum Abatement Amount may be over $430,000,000. The Allocation Agreement does not govern the attorneys' fees and costs for the associated litigation, but notes that that is anticipated to be approximately $57,000,000. The Allocation Agreement sets forth the steps that local governments must take in order to participate Packet Pg. 172 8.6 in the opioid settlement: Requirements to become a Participating Local Government. To become a Participating Local Government that can participate in this Allocation Agreement, a Local Government must do all of the following: A. The Local Government must execute and return this Allocation Agreement. B. The Local Government must release their claims against the Settling Distributors and agree to by bound by the terms of the Distributors Settlement by timely executing and returning the Participation Form. This form is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. C. Litigating Subdivisions must dismiss the Settling Distributors with prejudice from their lawsuits. The Litigating Subdivisions are listed on Exhibit B of the Distributors Settlement. D. The Local Government must execute and return the One Washington Memorandum of Understanding Between Washington Municipalities ("MOU") agreed to by the Participating Local Governments in Washington State, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. As specified in Paragraph 10.A of this Allocation Agreement, the Local Government may elect in its discretion to execute the MOU for purposes of this Allocation Agreement only. As noted above, the City has already submitted signature pages for the Participation Form and MOU as required by Sections B and D, above. And the City is not a "litigating subdivision" that would need to take any action as required by Section C, above. The only remaining step is to provide a signature on the Allocation Agreement. The City Attorney's Office can answer questions regarding the requirements of the Allocation Agreement as needed. Attachments: 9-page Allocation Agreement without Exhibits; link to 108-page Allocation Agreement with Exhibits, which include the Distributors Washington Settlement Agreement, the Subdivision Settlement Participation Form, the MOU and other supporting documents: https://agportal-s3bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/Allocation%20Agreement O.pdf Attachments: Opioid Settlement Allocation Agreement (No Exhibits) 8.8.2022 Packet Pg. 173 8.6.a ALLOCATION AGREEMENT GOVERNING THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS PAID BY THE SETTLING OPIOID DISTRIBUTORS IN WASHINGTON STATE AUGUST 8, 2022 This Allocation Agreement Governing the Allocation of Funds Paid by the Settling Opioid Distributors in Washington State (the "Allocation Agreement") governs the distribution of funds obtained from AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the "Settling Distributors") in connection with its resolution of any and all claims by the State of Washington and the counties, cities, and towns in Washington State ("Local Governments") against the Settling Distributors (the "Distributors Settlement"). The Distributors Settlement including any amendments are attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 1. This Allocation Agreement is intended to be a State -Subdivision Agreement as defined in Section I.VVV of the Global Settlement (the "Global Settlement"), which is Exhibit H of the Distributors Settlement. This Allocation Agreement shall be interpreted to be consistent with the requirements of a State -Subdivision Agreement in the Global Settlement. 2. This Allocation Agreement shall become effective only if all of the following occur: A. All Litigating Subdivisions in Washington and 90% of Non -Litigating Primary Subdivisions in Washington as the terms are used in Section II.C.1 of the Distributors Settlement must execute and return the Subdivision Settlement Participation Form, Exhibit F of the Distributors Settlement (the "Participation Form") by September 23, 2022. This form is also attached hereto as Exhibit 2. B. The Consent Judgment and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, Exhibit G of the Distributors Settlement, is filed and approved by the Court. C. The number of Local Governments that execute and return this Allocation Agreement satisfies the participation requirements for a State -Subdivision Agreement as specified in Exhibit O of the Global Settlement. 3. Requirements to become a Participating Local Government. To become a Participating Local Government that can participate in this Allocation Agreement, a Local Government must do all of the following: A. The Local Government must execute and return this Allocation Agreement. B. The Local Government must release their claims against the Settling Distributors and agree to by bound by the terms of the Distributors Settlement by timely executing and returning the Participation Form. This form is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Packet Pg. 174 8.6.a C. Litigating Subdivisions must dismiss the Settling Distributors with prejudice from their lawsuits. The Litigating Subdivisions are listed on Exhibit B of the Distributors Settlement. D. The Local Government must execute and return the One Washington Memorandum of Understanding Between Washington Municipalities ("MOU") agreed to by the Participating Local Governments in Washington State, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. As specified in Paragraph 10.A of this Allocation Agreement, the Local Government may elect in its discretion to execute the MOU for purposes of this Allocation Agreement only. A Local Government that meets all of the conditions in this paragraph shall be deemed a "Participating Local Government." Alternatively, if the requirements of Paragraphs 2(A), 2(B), and 2(C) of this Allocation Agreement are satisfied and this Allocation Agreement becomes effective, then all Local Governments that comply with Paragraph 3(B) of this Allocation Agreement shall be deemed a "Participating Local Government." 4. This Allocation Agreement applies to the Washington Abatement Amount as defined in Section IV.A of the Distributors Settlement. The maximum possible Washington Abatement Amount for the Distributors Settlement is $430,249,769.02. As specified in the Global Settlement, the Washington Abatement Amount varies dependent on the percentage of Primary Subdivisions that choose to become Participating Local Governments and whether there are any Later Litigating Subdivisions as defined in Section I.EE of the Global Settlement. 5. This Allocation Agreement does not apply to the Washington Fees and Costs as defined in Section V of the Distributors Settlement. After satisfying its obligations to its outside counsel for attorneys' fees and costs, the State estimates that it will receive approximately $46 million for its own attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Section V.B.1 of the Distributors Settlement. The State shall utilize any and all amounts it receives for its own attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Section V.B.1 of the Distributors Settlement to provide statewide programs and services for Opioid Remediation as defined in Section I.SS of the Global Settlement. 6. While this Allocation Agreement does not apply to the Washington Fees and Costs as defined in Section V of the Distributors Settlement, Section V.B.2 of the Distributors Settlement estimates that the Settling Distributors shall pay $10,920,914.70 to Participating Litigating Subdivisions' attorneys for fees and costs. The actual amount may be greater or less. This Allocation Agreement and the MOU are a State Back -Stop Agreement. The total contingent fees an attorney receives from the Contingency Fee Fund pursuant to Section II. D in Exhibit R the Global Settlement, the MOU, and this Allocation Agreement combined cannot exceed 15% of the portion of the LG Share paid to the Litigating Local Government that retained that firm (i.e., if City X filed suit with outside counsel 2 Packet Pg. 175 8.6.a on a contingency fee contract and City X receives $1,000,000 from the Distributors Settlement, then the maximum that the firm can receive is $150,000 for fees.) 7. No portion of the Washington Fees and Costs as defined in Section V of the Distributors Settlement and/or the State Share as defined in Paragraph 8.A of this Allocation Agreement shall be used to fund the Government Fee Fund ("GFF") referred to in Paragraph 10 of this Allocation Agreement and Section D of the MOU, or in any other way to fund any Participating Local Government's attorneys' fees, costs, or common benefit tax other than the aforementioned payment by the Settling Distributors to Participating Litigating Subdivisions' attorneys for fees and costs in Section V.13.2 of the Distributors Settlement. 8. The Washington Abatement Amount shall and must be used by the State and Participating Local Governments for Opioid Remediation as defined in Section I.SS of the Global Settlement, except as allowed by Section V of the Global Settlement. Exhibit 4 is a non -exhaustive list of expenditures that qualify as Opioid Remediation. Further, the Washington Abatement Amount shall and must be used by the State and Participating Local Governments as provided for in the Distributors Settlement. 9. The State and the Participating Local Governments agree to divide the Washington Abatement Amount as follows: A. Fifty percent (50%) to the State of Washington ("State Share"). B. Fifty percent (50%) to the Participating Local Governments ("LG Share"). 10. The LG Share shall be distributed pursuant to the MOU attached hereto as Exhibit 3 as amended and modified in this Allocation Agreement. 11. For purposes of this Allocation Agreement only, the MOU is modified as follows and any contrary provisions in the MOU are struck: A. The MOU is amended to add new Section E.6, which provides as follows A Local Government may elect in its discretion to execute the MOU for purposes of this Allocation Agreement only. If a Local Governments executes the MOU for purposes of this Allocation Agreement only, then the MOU will only bind such Local Government and be effective with respect to this Allocation Agreement and the Distributors Settlement, and not any other Settlement as that term is defined in Section A.14 of the MOU. To execute the MOU for purposes of this Allocation Agreement only, the Local Government may either (a) check the applicable box on its signature page of this Allocation Agreement that is returned or (b) add language below its signature lines in the MOU that is returned indicating that the Local Government is executing or has Packet Pg. 176 8.6.a executed the MOU only for purposes of the Allocation Agreement Governing the Allocation of Funds Paid by the Settling Opioid Distributors in Washington State. B. Exhibit A of the MOU is replaced by Exhibit E of the Global Settlement, which is attached as Exhibit 4 to this Agreement. C. The definition of "Litigating Local Governments" in Section AA of the MOU shall mean Local Governments that filed suit against one or more of the Settling Defendants prior to May 3, 2022. The Litigating Local Governments are listed on Exhibit B of the Distributors Settlement, and are referred to as Litigating Subdivisions in the Distributors Settlement. D. The definition of "National Settlement Agreement" in Section A.6 of the MOU shall mean the Global Settlement. E. The definition of "Settlement" in Section A.14 of the MOU shall mean the Distributors Settlement. F. The MOU is amended to add new Section C.4.g.vii, which provides as follows: "If a Participating Local Government receiving a direct payment (a) uses Opioid Funds other than as provided for in the Distributors Settlement, (b) does not comply with conditions for receiving direct payments under the MOU, or (c) does not promptly submit necessary reporting and compliance information to its Regional Opioid Abatement Counsel ("Regional OAC") as defined at Section CA.h of the MOU, then the Regional OAC may suspend direct payments to the Participating Local Government after notice, an opportunity to cure, and sufficient due process. If direct payments to Participating Local Government are suspended, the payments shall be treated as if the Participating Local Government is foregoing their allocation of Opioid Funds pursuant to Section C.4.d and C.4.j.iii of the MOU. In the event of a suspension, the Regional OAC shall give prompt notice to the suspended Participating Local Government and the Settlement Fund Administrator specifying the reasons for the suspension, the process for reinstatement, the factors that will be considered for reinstatement, and the due process that will be provided. A suspended Participating Local Government may apply to the Regional OAC to be reinstated for direct payments no earlier than five years after the suspension." G. Consistent with how attorney fee funds for outside counsel for Participating Local Subdivisions are being administered in most states across the country, the Government Fee Fund ("GFF") set forth in the 2 Packet Pg. 177 8.6.a MOU shall be overseen by the MDL Fee Panel (David R. Cohen, Randi S. Ellis and Hon. David R. Herndon (ret.)). The Fee Panel will preside over allocation and disbursement of attorney's fees in a manner consistent with the Motion to Appoint the Fee Panel to Allocate and Disburse Attorney's Fees Provided for in State Back -Stop Agreements and the Order Appointing the Fee Panel to Allocate and Disburse Attorney's Fees Provided for in State Back -Stop Agreements, Case No. 1:17-md-02804- DAP Doc #: 4543 (June 17, 2022). H. The GFF set forth in the MOU shall be funded by the LG Share of the Washington Abatement Amount only. To the extent the common benefit tax is not already payable by the Settling Distributors as contemplated by Section D.8 of the MOU, the GFF shall be used to pay Litigating Local Government contingency fee agreements and any common benefit tax referred to in Section D of the MOU, which shall be paid on a pro rata basis to eligible law firms as determined by the Fee Panel. To fund the GFF, fifteen percent (15%) of the LG Share shall be deposited in the GFF from each LG Share settlement payment until the Litigating Subdivisions contingency fee agreements and common benefit tax (if any) referred to in Section D of the MOU are satisfied. Under no circumstances will any Non -Litigating Primary Subdivision -or Litigating Local Government be required to contribute to the GFF more than 15% of the portion of the LG Share allocated to such Non -Litigating Primary Subdivision or Litigating Local Government. In addition, under no circumstances will any portion of the LG Share allocated to a Litigating Local Government be used to pay the contingency fees or litigation expenses of counsel for some other Litigating Local Government. The maximum amount of any Litigating Local Government contingency fee agreement (from the Contingency Fee Fund pursuant to Section II. D in Exhibit R the Global Settlement) payable to a law firm permitted for compensation shall be fifteen percent (15%) of the portion of the LG Share paid to the Litigating Local Government that retained that firm (i.e., if City X filed suit with outside counsel on a contingency fee contract and City X receives $1,000,000 from the Distributors Settlement, then the maximum that the firm can receive is $150,000 for fees.) The firms also shall be paid documented expenses due under their contingency fee agreements that have been paid by the law firm attributable to that Litigating Local Government. Consistent with the Distributors Settlement and Exhibit R of the Global Settlement, amounts due to Participating Litigating Subdivisions' attorneys under this Allocation Agreement shall not impact (i) costs paid by the subdivisions to their attorneys pursuant to a State Back -Stop agreement, (ii) fees paid to subdivision attorneys from the Common Benefit Fund for common benefit work performed by the attorneys pursuant to Section II.0 of Exhibit R of the Global Settlement, or (iii) costs paid to subdivision attorneys from the MDL Expense Fund 5 Packet Pg. 178 8.6.a for expenses incurred by the attorneys pursuant to Section ILE of the Global Settlement. K. Under no circumstances may counsel receive more for its work on behalf of a Litigating Local Government than it would under its contingency agreement with that Litigating Local Government. To the extent a law firm was retained by a Litigating Local Government on a contingency fee agreement that provides for compensation at a rate that is less than fifteen percent (15%) of that Litigating Local Government's recovery, the maximum amount payable to that law firm referred to in Section D.3 of the MOU shall be the percentage set forth in that contingency fee agreement. L. For the avoidance of doubt, both payments from the GFF and the payment to the Participating Litigating Local Governments' attorneys for fees and costs referred to in Paragraph 6 of this Allocation Agreement and Section V.13.2 Distributors Settlement shall be included when calculating whether the aforementioned fifteen percent (15%) maximum percentage (or less if the provisions of Paragraph 10.K of this Allocation Agreement apply) of any Litigating Local Government contingency fee agreement referred to above has been met. M. To the extent there are any excess funds in the GFF, the Fee Panel and the Settlement Administrator shall facilitate the return of those funds to the Participating Local Governments as provided for in Section D.6 of the MOU. 12. In connection with the execution and administration of this Allocation Agreement, the State and the Participating Local Governments agree to abide by the Public Records Act, RCW 42.56 eq seq. 13. All Participating Local Governments, Regional OACs, and the State shall maintain all non -transitory records related to this Allocation Agreement as well as the receipt and expenditure of the funds from the Distributors Settlement for no less than five (5) years. 14. If any party to this Allocation Agreement believes that a Participating Local Government, Regional OAC, the State, an entity, or individual involved in the receipt, distribution, or administration of the funds from the Distributors Settlement has violated any applicable ethics codes or rules, a complaint shall be lodged with the appropriate forum for handling such matters, with a copy of the complaint promptly sent to the Washington Attorney General, Complex Litigation Division, Division Chief, 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98104. 15. To the extent (i) a region utilizes a pre-existing regional body to establish its Opioid Abatement Council pursuant to the Section 4.h of the MOU, and (ii) that IN Packet Pg. 179 8.6.a pre-existing regional body is subject to the requirements of the Community Behavioral Health Services Act, RCW 71.24 et seq., the State and the Participating Local Governments agree that the Opioid Funds paid by the Settling Distributors are subject to the requirements of the MOU and this Allocation Agreement. 16. Upon request by the Settling Distributors, the Participating Local Governments must comply with the Tax Cooperation and Reporting provisions of the Distributors Settlement and the Global Settlement. 17. Venue for any legal action related to this Allocation Agreement (separate and apart from the MOU, the Distributors Settlement, or the Global Settlement) shall be in King County, Washington. 18. Each party represents that all procedures necessary to authorize such party's execution of this Allocation Agreement have been performed and that such person signing for such party has been authorized to execute this Allocation Agreement. 7 Packet Pg. 180 8.6.a FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: ROBERT W.FERGUSON Attorney General JEFFREY G. RUPERT Division Chief Date: Packet Pg. 181 8.6.a FOR THE PARTICIPATING LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Name of Participating Local Government: Authorized signature: Name: Title: Date: A Local Government may elect in its discretion to execute the MOU for purposes of this Allocation Agreement only by checking this box (see Paragraph 10.A of this Allocation Agreement): ❑ Local Government is executing the MOU in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 3, but which is further amended and modified as set forth in this Allocation Agreement, only purposes of this Allocation Agreement. G� Packet Pg. 182 8.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Changes to Finance Manager Job Description Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History This is to make small changes to the Finance Manager job description, mainly to change the reporting responsibility from Public Works to Administrative Services. Staff Recommendation Approve changes as part of Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: Public Works and Utilities Financial Manager rev 2022-08 Packet Pg. 183 8.7.a City of EDMONDS Washington .1. ,t, Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities Department: Publie Wens Administrative Services Bargaining Unit: AFSCME Council 2 Revised Date: duly 208September 2022 Pay Grade: NE-14 FLSA Status: Non-exempt Reports To: o, bliG WGFkS & Utilities Administrative Services Director POSITION PURPOSE: Under the supervision of the PubAdministrative Services Director (Director) the Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities performs professional financial management and accounting activities primarily for the Public Works and Utilities Department (PW&U). Responsibilities include departmental project and grant accounting; management of utility rate studies, rate calculations, and comparative rate analyses; acting as financial advisor to the Director and Departmental Managers in the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program, Transportation Improvement Program, and Comprehensive Plans for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater; organizes and participates in the preparation of the Department's annual budget and financial reports; develops the PW&U Department long-range financial planning inputs to the Finance Department; consistently applies relevant accounting standards and practices as established by the Finance Department and City financial policies, follows guidelines established by granting and/or contracting agencies; understands and applies the Washington State Budgeting, Accounting, and Reporting System (BARS); and ensures the accuracy of information provided by the PW&U Department to the City's Finance Department for subsequent preparation of periodic financial reports. Provides leadership, procedural support, and guidance to staff assigned to work on capital projects and grants. Works closely with Finance Department staff and PW&U Managers {6) to help develop annual budget submittals, estimate revenues, track budget performance, identify deviations from expected performance as early as possible, and develop budget amendments as necessary. The position will also provide data and evaluation for updating Public Works capital asset records, including recording and documenting Public Works asset dispositions and trade-ins. Additionally, this position will be responsible for quality control and documentation for grant agency invoicing and reimbursements to ensure grant and contract work is reimbursed to the City in a timely manner. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, but only as a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) assigned to this position are expected to perform the responsibilities of the Accountants and may or may not be required to perform all duties listed, and may be required to perform additional, position -specific duties. • Responsible for preparing Public Works Department grant agency invoicing and reimbursements to ensure that grant and contract work is reimbursed to the City in a timely manner. Provides similar services for other departmental grants being managed by the Public Works Department. • Prepares and submits accurate and timely Public Works Department Capital Work In Progress status reports as required by the Finance Department. • Following guidance and policies established by the Finance Department, establishes and maintains project accounting codes and structures to ensure a consistent application of these policies across all Divisions in the Public Works Department. Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities Last Reviewe Last Revise Packet Pg. 184 8.7.a 2 of 4 JOB DESCRIPTION Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities • Responsible for working as the key Public Works Department team member in developing the text and data necessary to prepare any revenue bond statements for reports on existing debt as well as for new borrowings. • Responsible for providing Public Works Department forecasts and summaries to the Finance Department and the Public Works Director for use in the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program. • Responsible for providing confidential research reports and analysis as requested for the Public Works Department labor negotiating representatives. • Responsible for developing the information required by the Director to respond to budget questions and accounting inquiries from other department directors, Councilmembers, and citizens. • Responsible for coordinating Public Works Department submittals to Finance for completion of the fixed asset reconciliation. • Responsible for preparing and maintaining a variety of reports, including preparing and presenting staff reports and other necessary correspondence as requested by the Director • Responsible for preparing ad hoc reports as requested by Public Works Department Divisions, and/or outside agencies as requested by the Director, and working on a variety of special projects as assigned by the Director. • Responsible for participating in the preparation of the City's annual budget by assisting Finance Division staff and Public Works Department Division Managers with their budgets; analyzing requested funding levels; preparing assigned portions of the budget document in coordination with the Director and other staff. • Responsible for providing information as requested by the Director in the preparation of the City's Long- range Financial Plan. • Provides data and evaluation for updating Public hz ., Wor ks rl,s capital asset records, provide periodic reports to the Public Works Director and Finance Department to ensure assets are accurately recorded in the City's capital asset system; accurately records and documents D hliG Works capital asset dispositions and trade-ins. • May be required to serve as staff on a variety of internal committees. • Attendance at occasional evening meetings may be required to represent the division or department at City Council meetings. • Responsible for attending and participating in professional group meetings, and maintaining awareness of new trends and developments in the fields related to the areas assigned. • Responsible for incorporating new developments in management and accounting as assigned, and ensuring processes, policies and practices are interpreted and applied consistently and effectively within the Public Works department. • Performs other duties as required. Required Knowledge of: • Operational characteristics, services and activities of governmental financial management and accounting. • Public sector accounting principles and practices, including generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), GASB, BARS, state laws and regulations, city codes and departmental policies. • Preparation of information for inclusion in overall City financial statements and comprehensive accounting reports, including producing data to be used by the Finance Department in preparing the CAFR annual financial report and annual budgets. • Grant recording and reporting for compliance with BARS. • Computer hardware and software for automated accounting/financial systems. • Techniques in data verification and data entry and proper coding of documents. • Analysis of complex financial statements, reports and systems. • Performing a variety of professional financial analyses and forecasts. • Principles of customer service and public relations. • Research methods and report preparation and presentation. Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities Last Reviewe Last Revise Packet Pg. 185 8.7.a 3 of 4 JOB DESCRIPTION Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities • Advanced mathematical computations adequate to correctly perform work. • Record -keeping and report writing techniques. • Effective oral and written communication principles and practices, to include public relations. • Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment, including computers and computer applications such as: word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases. • English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation. • Principles of business letter writing. • Principles and practices of governmental budget preparation and administration. Required Skill in: • Meeting deadlines, working with multiple projects and overseeing, verifying and validating the work of others, occasionally including those in other departments. • Operating automated accounting systems and general office equipment. • Familiarity with and competency in Microsoft Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Outlook. Competency with €derma City Financial software, asset management, and GIS systems desired but not required_ • Identifying and reporting discrepancies between budgeted and actual financial performance_ • Analyzing and interpreting fiscal and accounting reports_ • Producing rapid and accurate mathematical computations. • Gathering and verifying data from multiple sources. • Responding to inquiries from customers, regulatory agencies, audit firms or members of the business community. • Interpreting and applying federal, state and local policies, laws and regulations. • Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work, and in compiling and preparing spreadsheets. • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside agencies, community groups and the general public. • Interpreting and administering policies and procedures sufficient to administer, discuss, resolve and explain them. • Maintaining confidentiality and communicating with tact and diplomacy. • Communicating effectively verbally and in writing, including public relations. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: Bachelor's Degree in Accounting, Finance, Business Administration or related field and three years of progressively responsible financial management experience and/or professional accounting that includes experience developing financial reports and recordkeeping, and budget preparation in a medium to large scale municipal or private sector organization, two years budgeting and accounting experience related to municipal utilities; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience. Required Licenses or Certifications: CPA license desired but not required. Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check & credit check. Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities Last Reviewe Last Revise Packet Pg. 186 8.7.a 4 of 4 JOB DESCRIPTION Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: • Office environment. • Constant interruptions. Physical Abilities • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. • Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment. • Reading and understanding a variety of materials. • Sitting or otherwise remaining stationary for extended periods of time. • Bending at the waist, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • May have to occasionally lift up to 25 pounds. Hazards: • Occasional contact with angry and/or dissatisfied customers. Incumbent Signature: Department Head: Date: Date: Financial Manager for Public Works & Utilities Last Reviewe Last Revise Packet Pg. 187 8.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas for 76th Ave and 220th St. Intersection Improvements Project. Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 18, 2021, the Professional Services Agreement with KPG for the 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW Intersection Improvements project was approved. On October 12, 2021, Supplemental Agreement #1 with KPG for the 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW Intersection Improvements Project was approved. On June 21, 2022, Supplemental Agreement #2 with KPG for the 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW Intersection Improvements Project was approved. On August 9, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the consent agenda for approval. A delay in scheduling the item on the consent agenda was related to the assignment of a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal by WSDOT for the supplemental agreement. Staff Recommendation Approve Supplemental Agreement with KPG Psomas. Narrative This project proposes intersection improvements at 76th Ave. W and 220th St. SW to convert the existing split phasing signal operation to simultaneous protected/permissive left turns with flashing yellow arrows for the eastbound and westbound movements. This conversion will be possible with the addition of left turn lanes for both movements. The existing bike lanes for the southbound and eastbound movements will be extended to the intersection as part of this project, along with sidewalk widening, planter strip addition depending on the land use category of the properties, water/stormwater upgrades with potential conversion of overhead lines to underground, and lighting upgrades. At the June 27tn 2022 City Council meeting, Council approved Option 2 as the preferred option to reconfigure travel lanes in the eastbound approach to provide a dedicated left turn lane (aligned with new dedicated left turn lane for the westbound movement), a combined thru / right turn lane with one departing eastbound lane only along 2201h St. SW, and removal of the proposed southbound right -turn lane along 76th Ave. Packet Pg. 188 8.8 As part of the preliminary design phase, the consultant has completed the survey base map, preliminary analysis for the environmental and stormwater requirements, street lighting evaluation, and undergrounding of overhead utility requirements. The following tasks will be completed in order to finalize the design and prepare final plans, specifications and cost estimates: Finalize survey; Finalize geotechnical report; Environmental documentation; Public outreach; Utility coordination; 30%, 60%, 90%, 95%, and 100% Plans Specifications & Estimate (including design of undergrounding utility conversion, and water and stormwater design); Right of way acquisition services and/or temporary construction easements for a total of (14) parcels; and Bid support. The LAG Professional Services Consultant Supplemental Agreement #3 is attached. City Staff and the consultant have agreed to a total contract amount of $988,662 (including $85,333 in management reserve). The total cost of Supplemental Agreement #3 for the Design Phase Contract is $807,951 and $180,711 for the ROW phase. The City secured a $702,000 Federal transportation grant for the design phase and a $387,500 Federal grant for the right of way phase. The City is negotiating with Puget Sound Regional Council on an adjustment (possibly pro -rated) in right of way grant funding due to a smaller project footprint with preferred option compared to initial project scope when grant application submitted. The local funding match for this project is revenue collected from the traffic impact fee program and Utility Local Funds (to fund Design / ROW phases). During the design phase, grant applications will be submitted to secure construction funds to build the project. Attachments: Attachment 1 - 76th Ave & 220th Supplemental Agreement Packet Pg. 189 8.8.a Washington State To Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number 3 KPG Psomas Inc. fka KPG, P.S. 3131 Elliott Ave, Ste 400 Seattle, WA Original Agreement Number Phone: 206-286-1640 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date KPG Psomas PN: 21002 5/24/21 12/31/24 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable 76th Ave W @ 200th St. SW Intersection Improvement Project $1,249,822.82 Description of Work The Consultant shall complete design and prepare 30%, 60%, 90% & 95% & Bid documents, prepare enviromental documents for permit approval, prepare Right of Way funding estimate, conduct ROW neogtiations, prepare contract specifications for WSDOT approval and support community outreach efforts. Design elements include: roadway widening, new curb, sidewalks, planters, new illuination & signal systems, water line replacement, minor storm modifications, new water quality system, aerial utility undergrounding and property restoration. The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with KPG Psomas Inc. flea KPG, P.S. and executed on 5/24/21 and identified as Agreement No. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: See attached exihbit B 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: December 31, 2024 III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: See attached exhibit B as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: By: �a 3/2022 Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 190 8.8.a Exhibit "A" Summary of Payments Basic Agreement Supplement #1 Supplement #2 Supplement #3 Total Direct Salary Cost $82,977.59 $2,780.11 $0.00 $329,117.60 $414,875.30 Ovehead (Icluding Payroll Additives) $129,467.17 $1,612.74 $0.00 $504,229.37 $635,309.28 Direct Non -Salary Costs $18,780.23 $250.00 $0.00 $57,272.29 $76,302.52 Fixed Fee $24,487.61 $805.95 $0.00 $98,042.16 $123,335.72 Total 1 $255,712.60 $5,448.80 $0.00 $988,661.42 $1,249,822.82 a+ a Packet Pg. 191 8.8.a EXHIBIT B City of Edmonds 76t" Ave W @ SW 220th St Intersection Improvements Supplement #3 — Final Design Scope of Work August 17, 2022 Background This supplement includes work to finalize the intersection design based on the preferred alternative developed during the preliminary design. The preferred alternative includes the addition of a westbound left turn lane, widening for a bike southbound bike lane on the north leg and an eastbound bike lane on the west leg; removal of second eastbound travel lane on the east leg for approx. 400 ft; installation of 7 ft sidewalks on all legs; installation of 5' planters on the north, south and east legs; water line replacement within the project limits, stormwater conveyance modifications and new water quality structures, new signal and illumination systems; and aerial utility undergrounding (except for high powered transmission lines on the south side of 220th St SW. The work to be performed by the consultant team consists of preparing design drawings and documentation, production of plans, specifications and cost estimates for review and bidding, environmental documentation, right of way acquisition services, & supplemental geotechnical investigation. The Design phase is partially funded through a Federal CMAQ grant / local funds (serving as local match) and the right of way acquisition phase is partially funded by a Federal STP grant / local funds (serving as local match). Right of way funds are required to be obligated by June of 2023. The City will be pursuing additional transportation grants in the future to fund the construction phase. This phase on the project includes finalizing the environmental assessment and receiving approval of the NEPA documentation, preparing the project funding estimate and completing right of way and easement acquisitions, completing the roadway, sidewalk, water conveyance, stormwater conveyance and water quality design, illumination and signal design, aerial utility undergrounding, property restoration and landscaping. Project Assumptions • Designs will meet the LAG Manual standards. • There is no set DBE goals for the design and right of way phases of the project. • The 2005 PROWAG standards will be used as a basis for ADA design requirements for all intersections. • No significant changes will be made to the overall layout or project footprint developed during the preliminary design phase. • Drafting and plan production will be completed using The Consultant standards established on previous City of Edmonds projects. City of Edmonds Page 1 of 24 76" Ave W @ 220' St Intersection Improvements Packet Pg. 192 8.8.a Work Element 1 Project Management It is anticipated that design, environmental permitting and right of way acquisition services will be completed by December 2024 (approx. 28 month duration). 1.1 Provide project management administrative services including: • Execution of subcontractor agreements • Preparation of monthly progress reports and invoices • Record keeping 1.2 Provide internal project management and coordination: • Project staff management and coordination • Subcontractor management and coordination • Prepare and update project schedule • Schedule and budget monitoring 1.3 Coordinate with City staff, including preparation and attendance of up to 8 coordination meetings throughout the duration of the project. • Review discussion meetings after each submittal has been reviewed (estimate 3) — Assumes 3 consultant team members at meeting • Project team meetings with the City throughout the project duration (estimate 9) — Assumes 3 consultant team members at meeting • Weekly check -in phone meetings for the duration of the project (PM only) Deliverables: ♦ Monthly invoices including a brief outline of work completed within the billing period and identification of any possible work or coordination items that may delay the project schedule ♦ Consultant and sub -consultant invoices shall be submitted in a format approved by the City and in compliance with the WSDOT LAG Manual ♦ Meeting agendas and minutes ♦ Emails regarding work status updates, design questions, coordination efforts, ect... ♦ Monthly Project Schedule updates when/if the project schedule is altered Work Element 2 Quality Control/Quality Assurance The Consultant shall provide internal QA/QC reviews of the following major work elements prior to submittal to the City. 2.1 Field review completed base maps for completeness and accuracy and incorporate findings. 2.2 Senior review of discipline reports. City of Edmonds Page 2 of 24 76" Ave W @ 220' St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design KPG Psomas Packet Pg. 193 8.8.a 2.3 Provide senior review of 30% Plans and estimates. 2.4 Provide senior review of 60% Plans, specifications and estimates. Provide constructability review of 60% Plans, specifications and estimates. 2.5 Provide senior review of 90% Plans, specifications and estimates. Provide constructability review of 90% Plans, specifications and estimates. 2.6 Provide senior review of 95% & Bid Plans, specifications and estimates. Deliverables: ♦ Senior review & construction review notes/recommendations regarding preliminary design to be submitted to the City ♦ The Consultant QA/QC checklist to be filled out and signed by senior reviewer. Checklists for each stage shall be provided concurrent with the submittal documents. Work Element 3 Supplemental Survey and Mapping Additional survey may be required to support the final design efforts. 3.1 Additional survey may be required to support driveway and utility design efforts. No additional survey work will be performed without prior authorization from the City. The Consultant shall use previously established controls for additional survey needs, integrate additional survey elements into the working basemap and update existing surface data as needed. Deliverables: ♦ Electronic copies of survey and basemap files saved in Civil 3D version 2018 or 2022 ♦ Back-up documentation for utility locates, utility measure -downs and control features Work Element 4 Environmental Permitting and Documentation Landau provided initial National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) support for the project, including submittal of Area of Potential Effect (APE) and Endangered Species Act (ESA) No Effect determination technical memoranda in 2021. The response from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation indicated that an additional survey may be needed, and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) updated its ESA effect determination guidance in June 2022 that includes revised procedures for assessing effects from stormwater. 4.1 WSDOT Local Programs NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form City of Edmonds Page 3 of 24 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement #3 — Final Design KPG Psomas Packet Pg. 194 8.8.a The Consultant will prepare a preliminary version of the WSDOT Local Programs NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) Form (formerly the Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary). The purpose of the preliminary NEPA CE form is to facilitate discussion with WSDOT Local Programs to determine subsequent NEPA compliance needs. To complete the preliminary version of the CE form, Landau will compile and review environmental information from readily available public domain resources to gain a general understanding of relevant environmental resources along the project corridor. The CE form will require a discussion of stormwater runoff treatment and detention, which will be based on the stormwater design report to be provided by KPG Psomas. This task includes preparation of a letter describing the APE in support of Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act compliance. The letter will include a figure outlining the project area and will support an evaluation of applicable Section 106 exemption. This task includes participation by a Landau Senior Associate in a NEPA kickoff meeting with staff from the City and WSDOT Local Programs. The final version of the project NEPA CE form will be prepared after the kickoff meeting and preparation of supporting documentation provided under the tasks described below. Assumptions: ♦ Federal funding will be provided by the Federal Highway Administration distributed through WSDOT Local Programs. ♦ The NEPA coordination meeting will occur after the preliminary version of the CE form has been updated. ♦ NEPA documentation prepared in association with federal funding will be adopted as the State Environmental Policy Act determination of non -significance pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-610. ♦ The project will not require preparation of individual discipline reports associated with air quality conformity/greenhouse gases, wetlands/waterways, Section 6f resources, Section 4(f), cultural/historic resources, or agricultural lands. Deliverables: ♦ An electronic copy of the preliminary and final NEPA CE form in Microsoft Word ♦ An electronic copy of the APE letter and associated figure 4.2 Traffic Noise Assessment The Consultant will conduct a traffic noise assessment for the project corridor for potential noise impacts to sensitive receivers within the project study area. The traffic noise assessment will include the following components: Pre -Consultation with WSDOT: Before conducting field work or traffic noise model (TNM) development, the Consultant will meet with WSDOT noise specialists, if necessary, to confirm the appropriate number of modeling receptors and noise validation measurement locations. City of Edmonds Page 4 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220' St SW Intersection Supplement 43 — Final Design Packet Pg. 195 8.8.a Noise Measurements for TNM Model Validation: Noise measurements will be collected along selected existing roadway segments that may be affected by the proposed project. The collected data will be used for model validation as part of the noise assessment. Noise Assessment: Noise levels will be predicted for the existing road (the "no -build" alternative) and one "build" alternative. The City planning department will be consulted to determine the locations for which residential building permits have been issued for any vacant lots adjacent to the roadway. A land -use inventory will be conducted to identify the existing and currently -permitted future noise -sensitive land uses and to assist in selection of noise modeling locations. Representative receiver locations will be modeled for prediction of noise levels and determination of noise impacts. The Consultant will incorporate provided traffic data into the model. The traffic noise impact criteria against which the project traffic noise levels will be evaluated will be from WSDOT's 2020 Traffic Noise Assessment and Abatement Policy guidance manual. Noise Barrier Analysis: If the noise analysis indicates impacts in areas where noise abatement measures are constructible, then the Consultant will use the TNM model to design the height and length of noise barrier walls that satisfy WSDOT's acoustical feasibility criteria. The Consultant will estimate the construction cost for each wall by using WSDOT's unit cost factor and will determine the economic reasonableness based on the number of benefited receivers shielded. For budgetary purposes, based on inspection of preliminary aerial photographs, this scope assumes that up to three separate noise walls will be evaluated. The Consultant will coordinate with the civil engineering design team to provide the required heights, top elevations, and lengths of each noise wall that satisfy both the feasibility and reasonableness criteria. Noise Discipline Report: The Consultant will prepare a technical report summarizing the findings of the noise study. The contents will include descriptions of land use in the project area, existing noise conditions, methods of analysis, impacts, and evaluated noise mitigation measures. Mitigation cost estimates will be included, and construction noise impacts will be discussed. The report will also include maps of the existing and proposed alignments, as well as existing and proposed future land uses, on a scaled vicinity map. Comparative tables will be prepared to aid in understanding project impacts and mitigation. A draft report will be submitted to the City for review. The Consultant will then revise the report based on the City's consolidated comments and submit it to WSDOT for review. The Consultant will respond to WSDOT comments to prepare the final report. Assumptions: ♦ The Consultant will conduct validation modeling for up to three receiver locations, and noise modeling for no more than 10 receiver locations. ♦ Peak hour Existing Year, No Build, and Build Year traffic volumes will be provided by the City ♦ The Consultant will provide a letter for the City to distribute to noise -sensitive receivers (i.e., residences, businesses, etc.) seeking permission to complete noise field measurements. City of Edmonds Page 5 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 196 8.8.a ♦ Efforts to collect noise measurements from building interiors or balconies is not included in this scope of services. r1PlivPrah1Pc- ♦ An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the City -review draft noise technical report ♦ An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the WSDOT-review draft noise technical report ♦ An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final noise technical report 4.3 Biological Assessment, Section 7 Endangered Species Act; Magnuson -Stevens Act Essential Fish Habitat Evaluation The Consultant will prepare a biological assessment (BA) for selected species federally listed as threatened or endangered in the action area under the Endangered Species Act and an Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) evaluation for the proposed project. The Consultant will obtain updated species lists from agency websites, request site -specific species and habitat information from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitats and Species database, and review information from the Washington Natural Heritage Program. Evaluation of specific project details, such as construction techniques and equipment used, timing of construction, and best management practices will be based on information provided by KPG Psomas. The report will establish the project action area, which will incorporate the farthest extent of both aquatic and terrestrial impacts. Appropriate environmental baseline information and species history will be summarized in the BA. A determination "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" (NLAA) is anticipated. The project is not expected to impact EFH. The Consultant will prepare a draft BA and EFH evaluation for review and comment by KPG Psomas and the City, and then a final document. Assumptions: ♦ The BA will be drafted using the current WSDOT template ♦ A 30 percent to 60 percent level of design will be sufficient for preparation of the BA and EFH evaluation report ♦ The project will have a NLAA determination on listed species and/or their designated critical habitat and a formal Biological Opinion will not be required. The project will have no adverse impact to EFH. ♦ WSDOT BA procedures for calculating the extent of in -water impacts will be used; this task includes water quality modeling using HI -RUN modeling software. In -water construction will not be required as part of the proposed project. ♦ This task does not include meetings with agency staff from the US Fish & Wildlife Service or National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries. ♦ Design and construction details required for permit applications that are not directly related to a critical areas determination will be provided to the LAI biologist. Such elements include, but are not limited to, a stormwater drainage City of Edmonds Page 6 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 197 8.8.a report; a temporary sediment and erosion control plan; proposed construction timing, sequencing, and duration; and primary types and duration of construction equipment to be used. ♦ This task does not include efforts to conduct a 6-month update review of species listings. ♦ The scope of work does not include monitoring of any federally listed or state listed species during construction activities. Should any monitoring of these species be required, an addendum to this scope and budget can be prepared. Deliverables: ♦ Electronic (Adobe PDF) copies of the draft and final BA and EFH Evaluation report. 4.4 Environmental Justice The Consultant will prepare the WSDOT Environmental Justice — Decision Matrix to assist the project team in determining whether minority or low-income groups or individuals should be targeted during the project's public involvement process. Based on available existing demographic information, the Consultant will inventory the population potentially impacted by the project to determine the extent of populations that conform to US Department of Transportation (DOT) definitions for "minority" and "low- income." The Consultant will examine US Census block information for the project area and local school district attendance records, and will compare demographic information of the people within the study area to the larger City/Snohomish County (County) populations to evaluate whether any minority or low-income populations reside within the project limits that exceed the characteristics of the City and/or County as a whole. The Consultant will also prepare a WSDOT Environmental Justice "letter to file" for the proposed project. The letter to file will be prepared consistent with Section 458 of the WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual. This work will include the following: A summary of the public involvement that has occurred for the project and documentation of any issues related to minority and low-income populations that have arisen through the project's public involvement process. A summary of the demographic information. Evaluation of any disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority or low-income populations as defined by DOT, which will include but not be limited to impacts associated with transportation, housing, community cohesion, and health and social services. A description of any measures that shall be taken to address disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority or low-income populations. Assumptions: ♦ The City will provide sufficient information on the project's public involvement history for the Consultant to summarize in the report. City of Edmonds Page 7 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220' St SW Intersection Supplement #3 — Final Design Packet Pg. 198 8.8.a ♦ The Consultant will not conduct door-to-door surveys of impacted dwellings or businesses. r1PlivPrah1Pc- ♦ Electronic (Adobe PDF) copies of the decision matrix 4.5 Screening -Level Hazardous Materials Linear Corridor Assessment The Consultant will conduct a screening -level assessment of sites along the project corridor for the potential presence of contamination. The screening -level assessment for the project corridor will include the following components: Reviewing available aerial photographs to assess past uses of the project corridor and adjacent properties from the present back to their first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. Reviewing listings from a subcontracted database service (Environmental Data Resources Inc.) of confirmed and suspected contaminated sites within a 1-mile radius of the project corridor abstracted from US Environmental Protection Agency, tribal, and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) environmental databases. Reviewing reports documenting previous environmental investigations completed at sites along the project corridor (if provided by the City and/or WSDOT). Conducting a site reconnaissance of the project corridor to visually and physically observe current land -use activities and environmental conditions from the project right- of-way. Requesting and reviewing information from Ecology, if necessary, to further evaluate the sites of potential hazardous and problem waste concerns for the project that were identified in the regulatory database search or site reconnaissance. Assumptions: ♦ A hazardous materials report to address hazardous and problem waste may be required by WSDOT based on its review of the preliminary CE Form. Preparation of a hazardous materials report is not included in this scope of services. The level of detail and report format for a hazardous materials report is dependent on the project activities, and type and number of potential hazardous material impacts identified. A scope and cost estimate to complete a hazardous materials report, if required by WSDOT, will be provided after receipt of review comments from WSDOT regarding the preliminary CE Form. The Consultant will not conduct door-to-door surveys of impacted dwellings or businesses. ♦ The screening -level hazardous materials linear corridor assessment technical memorandum will not meet the requirements of a Phase I environmental site assessment under ASTM International standard E 1 527-13. ♦ Building interiors will not be accessed as part of the site reconnaissance. ♦ Conditions at immediately adjacent properties may not be observable from public access areas and, as a result, may not be identified during the site reconnaissance. ♦ Please note that during the agency level are experiencin City of Edmonds 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design g 8.8.a more to complete. If file reviews cannot be completed by the time the screening - level hazardous materials linear corridor assessment is published, the lack of file review may be identified as a data gap and its significance in relation to the opinions and conclusions of the report would be noted. nPlivPrahlAc- ♦ An electronic copy of the draft screening -level hazardous materials linear corridor assessment technical memorandum in Microsoft Word format and Adobe PDF format. ♦ An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final screening -level hazardous materials linear corridor assessment technical memorandum. 4.6 Cultural/Historic Resources Landau will subcontract with Cultural Resource Consultants, LLC (CRC) to provide cultural/historic resources support. CRC will conduct background research, a limited site evaluation, and prepare a report for cultural/historic resources compliance. Assumptions: ♦ Preparation of historic property inventory forms is not included in this scope of services. nPlivPrah1Pc- ♦ An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the draft cultural/historic resources assessment technical memorandum. ♦ An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final cultural/historic resources assessment technical memorandum. Work Element 5 Community Outreach 5.1 Prepare for attend one-on-one property owner meetings for the parcels that are more heavily impacted by the proposed improvements to discuss proposed changes and identify mitigation measures. 5.2 Prepare updated graphics to post on the City's website. 5.3 Prepare for and attend one Open House Meeting with the community. The Consultant shall provide scroll plots, perspective drawings and other graphics in support of the community meeting. This task assumes the Consultant shall provide 2 engineers familiar with the project at the open house. 5.4 Attendance at 1 council meeting to discussion project status. Work Element 6 30% Design and Submittal The Consultant shall provide Plans and Estimates in accordance with the current WSDOT H&LP Local Agency Guidelines (LAG) Manual for review and approval by the City. Plans shall be formatted to provide sufficient detail for convenient field layout of all proposed facilities. City of Edmonds Page 9 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 200 8.8.a City standard details and WSDOT standard plans will be supplemented with project specific details as required. 6.1 30% Design and Plans Civil Design - Using the design criteria established in the Design Memo, the 30% Civil Design and Plans will include identification and stationing of the roadway centerlines, removal limits, proposed curb and sidewalk locations, roadway and lane widths, channelization and signage, proposed driveway locations and reconstruction limits, grading limits, walls with approx. heights and preliminary property reconstruction limits and impacts and right of way/easement needs. Illumination Design - The illumination plans shall include illumination layouts based on the AG132 analysis (already completed as part of preliminary design) Signal Design - and the Consultant shall meet on -site with agency staff for coordination/verification of existing signal equipment with the signal maintenance representative will be performed prior to beginning the signal design. The signal plans shall include intersection layout and equipment including cabinets (signal, BBS, service), poles, signal heads, pushbuttons, EVPE and detection, signs and any other equipment to show intent of the design. The design will include maintaining the existing ADAPTIVE SYSTEM connection (from 1-5 to 76t" Ave.W). Landscape and Restoration Design — Landscaping and restoration areas will be identified on the plans by hatching. General landscaping details will be included in the 30% submittal. Specific planting plans will not be included until the 60% Submittal. Plans shall be 1 "=10' scale full size and shall include: • Title and index sheet with a vicinity map • Legends, abbreviations, survey control and general notes sheet • Typical section and detail sheets (general details only at 30%) • Site preparation and erosion control plan sheets • Roadway alignment plan sheets • Storm alignment plan sheets • Water alignment plan sheets • Signalization and Illumination plan and detail sheets • Channelization and signing plan sheets • Landscaping plan and detail sheets • Right of Way and easement plan sheets City of Edmonds Page 10 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 2201 St SW Intersection Supplement 43 — Final Design Packet Pg. 201 8.8.a 6.2 30% Aerial Utility Undergrounding Design and Plans The various franchise utility providers will be contacted and informed of the potential project. Existing facility maps will be obtained and compared to the basemap to determine if all existing facilities are identified. The Consultant will work with the franchise utility providers to develop preliminary trench alignments and determine the number and type of required structures and well as possible structure locations. Preliminary private service connections will also be identified. 30% JUT plans and preliminary details sheet will be developed and included with the 30% submittal. If the City wishes to move forward with the Aerial utility undergrounding design, the plans will be sent to the franchise utility providers for review and comment. 6.3 30% Cost Estimate The Consultant will develop 30% estimate of cost based on the 30% design. Unit and lump sum costs will be determined based on current bid prices with and escalation percentage assuming a construction advertisement date in late 2024. City standard contingencies will be included for potential bid item additions or changes in quantities. The ROW acquisition costs will be determined using data provided by RES NW. Sufficient contingencies will be included for potential bid item additions or changes in quantities. Assumptions: ♦ Aerial Utility Undergrounding will be a separate schedule of work in the cost estimate. ♦ The plans will incorporate applicable City, County and WSDOT design standards and details as appropriate and required. Deliverables: ♦ 30% plans sheet set (PDF) ♦ 30% Cost Estimate (PDF) Work Element 7 60% Design and Submittal After the City has reviewed and commented on the 30% Submittal documents the Consultant shall begin preparing the 60% Submittal documents. The 60% design will address City comments and builds on the 30% design and cost estimate. 7.1 60% Design and Plans Civil Design — Curb and centerline profiles will be added to roadway plans, ADA ramp details will be developed, driveway and wall profile and detail sheets will be added, grading and restoration limits will be refined, additional details and callout information will be included on the plans, stationing and offset information will be included on channelization and signing plans. Site preparation and erosion City of Edmonds Page 11 of 24 KPG Psomas 76`h Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 202 8.8.a control plans will be updated and right of way plans will be further developed to comply with WSDOT requirements for ROW funding obligations. Illumination Design - The illumination layout will be adjusted as necessary to fit with the proposed improvements and still meet coverage requirements. The electrical service and power source locations shall be coordinated with SnoPUD and identified on the plans. Signal Design - The plans shall be updated to include phasing diagram, signal head assignments, general and construction notes, legend, sign schedule, partial signal pole specifications and details. A review of geotechnical report and evaluation of the structural design of foundations shall be conducted. The Consultant will evaluate the ability to keep the existing signal components and determine an approach to temporary signal operation during the various phases of construction. If necessary, additional plans shall be provided for temporary modifications to the signal system. Landscape and Restoration Design — Landscaping and restoration areas will be adjusted to account for changes in the grading and replacement limits. Specific planting layouts and details will be developed. Private irrigation systems will be reviewed and evaluated for necessary modifications due to the project improvements. Traffic Control and Phasing Plans — These plans will include a preliminary evaluation of lane closures and potential work to be performed, identify pedestrian access routes and note if any detours are likely to be required. Additional Plans to be included in the 60% Submittal: • Roadway profile sheets • Driveway plan and profile sheets • Wall plan and profile sheets • Temporary signal sheets • Traffic Control and phasing sheets 7.2 60% Pothole Plans The Consultant will coordinate with the utility departments and franchise utility companies for the preparation of the utility basemap. The Consultant will identify required locations for potholing based on project designs. The City shall approve the location and number of potholes being performed. The Consultant will provide a surveyor on site to pick up the elevation and location of the pothole. Pothole plans and the basemap will be updated with the potholing information. The Consultant will provide the updated information to the franchise utilities. City of Edmonds Page 12 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 203 8.8.a 7.3 60% Cost Estimate The Consultant will update the cost estimate to include new bid items and updated quantities for previous bid items. Increases in unit and lump sum costs will be evaluated based on the most current bid prices and any changes to the anticipated construction advertisement fate for the project. City standard contingencies will be included for potential bid item additions or changes in quantities. 7.4 60% Specifications The Consultant will use a City provided template to start the specifications for the project. For this submittal The Consultant will focus on the updating Division 2-9 special provisions to include all identified project elements and clearly identify methods of measurement and payment. City and Federal contract documents and Division 1 will not be addressed in this submittal 7.5 60% Aerial Utility Undergrounding Design, P,S & E The 60% design for the aerial utility undergrounding will include refinement of structure locations based on resident input, identification of private service connection needs, development of JUT profiles and specific trench sections, as well as structure location tables and callouts. Custom special provisions will be written for the aerial utility undergrounding based on past projects and input from the franchise utilities. Costs estimates for aerial utility undergrounding will be prepared. Each utility will have a separate schedule. Assumptions: ♦ The City will provide bid contract document templates (contract forms, Invitation to Bid formats, City GSPs, etc.). ♦ The franchise utilities will perform potholing of their facilities at their own cost ♦ City utility potholing will be performed by an approved sub -contractor, the $50,000 potholing budget is as estimate. The Consultant shall provide the City with an approved potholing cost estimation before potholing work can begin npiivPrnhIPc- ♦ 60% plans sheet set (PDF) ♦ 60%ROW plans (WSDOT approved format (PDF) ♦ 60% Pothole plans (PDF) ♦ 60% Cost Estimate (PDF) ♦ 60% Special Provisions (PDF & Word) ♦ Response log w/ consultant comments to address City's 30% comments (Excel) City of Edmonds Page 13 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220' St SW Intersection Supplement 43 — Final Design Packet Pg. 204 8.8.a Work Element 8 90% Design and Submittal The 60% comments from the City WSDOT, utility providers and other stakeholders will be addressed and incorporated into the 90% submittal. 8.1 90% Design and Plans The design will be revised based on 60% comments from the City, Snohomish County, Franchise Utility providers and elements identified during ROW negotiations. Layouts, details, notes and tables will be adjusted and refined to provide sufficient information for construction. 8.2 90% Cost Estimate The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. City standard contingencies will be included for potential bid item additions or changes in quantities. 8.3 90% Specifications The specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. City and stakeholder comments will be addressed. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. 8.4 90% Aerial Utility Undergrounding Design, P,S & E The 90% design for the aerial utility undergrounding will include comments from the City and the franchise utilities. Plans will include refinement of structure locations and private service connection needs based on property owner feedback, updating of JUT profiles and trench sections, as well as structure location tables and callouts. Special provisions will be updated with current franchise utility standards and requirements. Costs estimates will be updated based on recent bid tabs and the projected construction date. 8.5 Structural Wall Design and Plans The Consultant shall develop wall plans, profiles, specifications and bid items to be included in the cost estimate. Deliverables: ♦ 90% plans sheet set (PDF) ♦ 90%ROW plans (WSDOT approved format (PDF) City of Edmonds Page 14 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 205 8.8.a ♦ 90% Cost Estimate (PDF) ♦ 90% Special Provisions (PDF & Word) ♦ Response log w/ consultant comments to address City's 60% comments (Excel) Work Element 9 95% Design and Submittal The 90% comments from the City WSDOT, utility providers and other stakeholders will be addressed and incorporated into the 95% submittal. 9.1 95% Design and Plans Layouts, details, notes and tables will be refined and finalized. 9.2 95% Cost Estimate The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. 9.3 95% Specifications Specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. 9.4 95% Aerial Utility Undergrounding Design, P, S & E The 95% design for the aerial utility undergrounding will include comments from the City and the franchise utilities. Plans will include refinement of structure locations and private service connection needs based on property owner feedback, updating of JUT profiles and trench sections, as well as structure location tables and callouts. Special provisions will be updated with current franchise utility standards and requirements. Costs estimates will be updated based on recent bid tabs and the projected construction date. Deliverables: ♦ 95% plans sheet set (PDF) ♦ 95%ROW plans (WSDOT approved format (PDF) ♦ 95% Cost Estimate (PDF) ♦ 95% Quantity Tabulations (Excel) ♦ 95% Special Provisions (PDF & Word) ♦ Response log w/ consultant comments to address City & WSDOT 90% comments (Excel) City of Edmonds Page 15 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 206 8.8.a Work Element 10 Bid Design and Submittal The 95% comments from the City and WSDOT will be addressed and incorporated into the Bid submittal. 10.1 Bid Design and Plans Final comments will be addressed. 10.2 Bid Cost Estimate The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items (if necessary). Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information. 10.3 Bid Specifications Specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. 10.4 Bid Aerial Utility Undergrounding Design, P, S & E The Bid design for the aerial utility undergrounding will include comments from the City and the franchise utilities. Special provisions will be updated with current franchise utility standards and requirements. Costs estimates will be updated based on recent bid tabs. Deliverables: ♦ Bid plans sheet set (PDF) ♦ Bid ROW plans (WSDOT approved format (PDF) ♦ Bid Cost Estimate (PDF) ♦ Bid Quantity Tabulations (Excel) ♦ Bid Special Provisions (PDF & Word) ♦ Response log w/ consultant comments to address City's, WSDOT and other agency 95% comments (Excel) Work Element 11 Water Conveyance Design 11.1 30% Design, Plans and Cost Estimate The 30% water design and plans will be further developed based on input and direction received as a result of concept verification/analysis efforts of the preliminary design phase. Locations of valves, services, bends and other City of Edmonds Page 16 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 207 8.8.a appurtenances will be identified on the plans. The Consultant shall also up update the bid item list associated with the water work and update unit costs based on current data and the anticipated advertisement date. 11.2 60% Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 30% comments and the horizontal alignment and connections will continue to be refined. Profiles will be developed. Details for valves, services, bends and other appurtenances will be prepared. The Consultant will use a City provided template to start the specifications for the project. For this submittal the focus will be to include all identified project elements and clearly identify methods of measurement and payment. The Consultant will update the cost estimate to include new bid items and updated quantities for previous bid items. Increases in unit and lump sum costs will be evaluated based on the most current bid prices and any changes to the anticipated construction advertisement fate for the project. Sufficient contingencies will be included for potential bid item additions or changes in quantities. 11.3 90% Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 60% comments from the City, Snohomish County, Franchise Utility providers and elements identified during ROW negotiations. Layouts, details, notes and tables will be adjusted and refined to provide sufficient information for construction. The specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. City and stakeholder comments will be addressed. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. 11.4 95% Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 90% comments from the City, WSDOT, Snohomish County, Franchise Utility providers, other project stakeholders and ROW negotiations. Layouts, details, notes and tables will be adjusted and refined. The specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. City, WSDOT and stakeholder comments will be addressed. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. City of Edmonds Page 17 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 208 8.8.a The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. 11.5 Bid Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 95% comments from the City, WSDOT, Snohomish County, Franchise Utility providers, other project stakeholders. The specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. City, WSDOT and stakeholder comments will be addressed. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. Assumptions: ♦ Bid items associated with water work will be a separate schedule of work in the cost estimate. ♦ The plans will incorporate applicable City, County and WSDOT design standards and details as appropriate and required. ♦ The City will provide bid contract document templates (contract forms, Invitation to Bid formats, City GSPs, etc.). Deliverables: ♦ 30%, 60%, 90%, 95% and Bid plans sheet set (PDF) ♦ 60%, 90%, 95% and Bid Special Provisions (PDF & Word) ♦ 30%, 60%, 90%, 95% and Bid Cost Estimate (PDF) ♦ Response log w/ consultant comments to address City's 30%, 60%, 90% & 95% comments (Excel) Work Element 12 Storm Conveyance and WQ System Design 12.1 30% Design, Plans and Cost Estimate The stormwater design will be updated based on the information determined during the draft technical memorandum and City comments on the preliminary design. The storm pipe, catch basin, manholes and water quality/treatment facilities will be sized and located. The Consultant shall also up update the bid item list associated with the storm work and update unit costs based on current data and the anticipated advertisement date. City of Edmonds Page 18 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 209 8.8.a 12.2 60% Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 30% comments. stormwater horizontal layouts will be refined, the storm system profiles will be added, details for conveyance and water quality facilities will be further developed. The Consultant will use a City provided template to start the specifications for the project. For this submittal the focus will be to include all identified project elements and clearly identify methods of measurement and payment. The Consultant will update the cost estimate to include new bid items and updated quantities for previous bid items. Increases in unit and lump sum costs will be evaluated based on the most current bid prices and any changes to the anticipated construction advertisement fate for the project. Sufficient contingencies will be included for potential bid item additions or changes in quantities. 12.3 90% Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 60% comments from the City, Snohomish County, Franchise Utility providers and elements identified during ROW negotiations. Layouts, details, notes and tables will be adjusted and refined to provide sufficient information for construction. The specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. City and stakeholder comments will be addressed. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. The Consultant shall update the draft Stormwater Technical Memo to account for design changes and requirements and provide a Final Stormwater Technical Memo as part of the 90% Submittal. 12.4 95% Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 90% comments from the City, WSDOT, Snohomish County, Franchise Utility providers, other project stakeholders and ROW negotiations. Layouts, details, notes and tables will be adjusted and refined. The specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. City, WSDOT and stakeholder comments will be addressed. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. City of Edmonds Page 19 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 210 8.8.a The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. 12.5 Bid Design, Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate The design will be revised based on 95% comments from the City, WSDOT, Snohomish County, Franchise Utility providers, other project stakeholders. The specifications shall be updated with current City and Federal contract documents as necessary. City, WSDOT and stakeholder comments will be addressed. Special Provisions will be updated per the most current WSDOT Standard Specifications and APWA & WSDOT GSPs. The cost estimate will be updated to include new bid items. Unit and lump sum prices will be evaluated based on the most recent bidding information and anticipated timing of advertisement. Assumptions: ♦ Bid items associated with storm conveyance and water quality work will be a separate schedule of work in the cost estimate. ♦ The plans will incorporate applicable City, County and WSDOT design standards and details as appropriate and required. ♦ The City will provide bid contract document templates (contract forms, Invitation to Bid formats, City GSPs, etc.). nPiivarahlAc- ♦ 30%, 60%, 90%, 95% and Bid plans sheet set (PDF) ♦ 60%, 90%, 95% and Bid Special Provisions (PDF & Word) ♦ 30%, 60%, 90%, 95% and Bid Cost Estimate (PDF) ♦ Response log to address City's 30%, 60%, 90% & 95% comments (Excel) ♦ Final Stormwater TIR Work Element 13 WSDOT Coordination and Documentation 13.1 WSDOT PS&E Approval The Consultant shall prepare the updated WSDOT Design Checklist and Design Matrix for the project, which will be submitted to the City for review and approval before the City submits to WSDOT for final approval. The Consultant shall prepare contract forms and Division 1 specifications in compliance with WSDOT P,S&E Checklist, and including the necessary APWA & WSDOT GSPs. 13.2 Additional Funding Estimate - If required for funding support, the Consultant shall City of Edmonds Page 20 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 211 8.8.a provide an updated cost estimate for an anticipated construction date in 2026. No work under this sub -task shall be conducted without prior authorization from the City. Assumptions: ♦ The City will complete the project PIF. ♦ It is assumed that 3 submittals will be required to receive WSDOT approval Deliverables: ♦ LAG Manual Matrix ♦ LAG Manual Checklist ♦ Division 1 Additions and Modifications for WSDOT review and approval ♦ Cost Estimate for Construction Year 2026 Work Element 14 Right of Way Services RES Group NW (RESGNW) shall perform the following work as part of the Right of Way services: • Coordination ROW consultant shall provide overall coordination for right-of-way activities; maintain records, files, documents and reports. • Status Reports During negotiations, ROW consultant shall provide written status reports on a monthly basis for twelve (12) months and provide verbal status reports as requested. • Monthly Project Meetings ROW consultant shall attend monthly project status meetings as requested. A maximum of one (1) meeting. • Contract Management, Maintenance and Billing • Pre -Negotiation Services o Document Review ■ ROW consultant shall review Title Commitment Reports, Right-of-way Plans, Legal Descriptions and Exhibits, and Appraisal Reports. ■ RESGNW will review City supplied title reports for affected parcel and provide Title Review Memo identifying all potential encumbrances to project team members. RESGNW will assist in clearing the necessary encumbrances prior to closing, if feasible. RESGNW will assist in facilitating in-house closing on low impact parcel or manage closing through escrow should those services become necessary. City of Edmonds Page 21 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 212 8.8.a • Appraisal Work and Evaluations o ROW consultant shall utilize the City's appraisal waiver valuation process for those parcels with just compensation of less than $25,000. Should appraisals be required, RESGNW will make a recommendation with cost estimates for appraisal consultants to KPG Psomas and/or the City. Appraisals and appraisal review contracts shall be handled directly by RESGNW and will make necessary recommendations to KPG Psomas and/or the City. o ROW consultant shall prepare a Right of Way funding estimate in accordance with the rules of WSDOT's Right of Way Procedures Manual, M26-01.18, and LAG Chapter 25.4 Right of Way Funding Estimate for WSDOT's review and approval. • Right of Way Documentation Services RESGNW will assist the Agency in developing all right-of-way documents/offer letters in accordance with the Agency's right-of-way procedures manual for acquisition of impacted properties. RESGNW will draft the acquisition documents using City approved forms or QC any forms that are created directly by City staff for pre -acquisition review by the WSDOT LPA coordinator before any offers are made to property owners. • Negotiation Services o ROW consultant shall provide pre -negotiation and negotiation services for securing of right-of-way in fee, temporary construction and permanent easements —Twelve (12) parcels. o Upon the City's approval to proceed with negotiations and the receipt of Determination of Value and the necessary documents from the City, ROW consultant shall contact property owners and advise them of the process; prepare and assemble negotiation packages; schedule appointments with property owners — Twelve (124) parcels. o If it becomes apparent that negotiations have reached an impasse and sufficient time has passed for the property owner to make a settlement decision, ROW consultant shall provide the City with a written notification. The filing of condemnation proceedings shall be the City's responsibility. • Closing Services: o ROW consultant shall prepare all documents necessary for monetary lien encumbrance removal and obtain signatures from parties in interest on each parcel with just compensation exceeding $10,000 for land acquisitions. o ROW consultant shall prepare payment vouchers for title clearing and submit to the City to process payment for the parcel (the City will issue actual payment of all fees charged by trustees and/or beneficiaries to clear encumbrances, and other closing costs such as title policies, recording fees, and escrow services if necessary); o ROW consultant shall submit payment vouchers to the City for payments to owners; o ROW consultant shall submit conveyance documents to the title company for recording. ROW consultant assumes 45 hours of negotiations per parcel. It is also assumed that there will be no more than twelve (12) as part of this project. City of Edmonds Page 22 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 213 8.8.a KPG Psomas will perform the following work items necessary to establish the existing Right -of - Way (ROW) and private property parcels within the survey limits, prepare documentation and graphics for ROW and easement acquisition and support ROW consultant as needed with ROW negotiations and graphics. Research Records. Determine which existing corners and monuments should be field located and surveyed. 14.1 Calculations for ROW lines. Using the research information and the survey work described above, calculate location and surveyed corners, roadway features and monuments. 14.2 Support RESGNW with graphics for property acquisition and negotiations (estimate 14 parcels). See attached exhibit for RESGNW scope of work. KPG Psomas task includes: • Providing graphics and information to RESGNW for appraisal services • Providing graphics and exhibits for outreach to impacted properties 14.3 KPG Psomas shall prepare ROW drawings in support of PFE to WSDOT requirements. Drawings shall include a schedule that includes parcel number, parcel owner, parcel area, Right -of -Way or easement acquisition area and total remaining unencumbered area for each parcel that requires an acquisition. 14.4 KPG Psomas shall prepare legal descriptions and map exhibits for approximately 14 parcels requiring right of way or easement acquisitions. Assumations: Exclusions: ♦ The City and KPG Psomas shall provide parcel sites and other parcel information, right-of-way plans, and legal descriptions. ♦ Title Reports will be ordered by the City at the City's expense. ♦ The ROW consultant will be the point -of -contact for property owners. ♦ Real estate legal services will be provided by City of Edmonds legal staff. ♦ The project is federally -funded. ♦ The project will not result with the dislocation of persons or personal property ♦ The actual filing of condemnation and subsequent litigation; ♦ Closing costs such as recording fees, escrow services, title insurance fees, title reports, transfer taxes, etc., penalty costs for pre -payments; costs of a pre- existing mortgage; the pro rate share of real property taxes paid subsequent to vesting title to the City; ♦ Continued negotiation services during condemnation or work associated in preparing and/or obtaining possession and use agreements; ♦ Additional appraisal and appraisal review fees; ♦ Relocation services nPux/PrahIPc- ♦ Legal descriptions and exhibits for easements and right-of-way acquisitions (assumes 10 parcels will require ROW/permanent easement acquisitions and 12 City of Edmonds Page 23 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 214 8.8.a parcels will require temporary construction easements) ♦ Existing and Proposed ROW plans (to be included in the plan submittals) ♦ Graphics to support ROW negotiations (assumes 12 parcels maximum) ♦ Draft Administrative Offer Summary ♦ Appraisals ♦ Offer Letters (assumes initial letter, plus 2 revisions) ♦ ROW plans for ROW Funding Estimate ♦ ROW certification documentation Work Element 15 Assistance During Bidding 15.1 Prepare addenda and respond to bidders questions relayed through the City. It is assumed that The Consultant will prepare three (3) addenda. The consultant team will not charge for work to prepare addendums if they are needed to correct or clarify errors or omissions in the bid package. Management Reserve Management reserve will be used to address potential unforeseen design changes and/or additions as mutually agreed upon by the City and the Consultant. No work will be billed to this task without prior authorization from the City. A fee estimate will be developed at the time the work is requested. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: The City of Edmonds may require other services of the consultant. These services could include additional design, right of way, environmental documentation, construction phase services, or other work tasks not included in the scope of work. At the time these services are required, the Consultant will provide the City with a detailed scope of work and an hour and fee estimate. The Consultant will not proceed with the work until the City has authorized the work and issued a Notice to Proceed. City of Edmonds Page 24 of 24 KPG Psomas 76" Ave W @ 220" St SW Intersection Supplement 93 — Final Design Packet Pg. 215 W L X W y C d E U O E 0 W i1 Z O 41 FC N N � N 0 N u~ iaoLL Z N NM 005# w + a J LL > E noQ0 0. Z �— C V U n N w u C N � N O ac�Q` y LL Y 0 0 0 0 W o 0 0 N V W O 00 N N W V 0 0 0 0 W In 0 0 0 0 N m M ONi Ol O V � M M O O M O o N O O 0 0 N V O O O 0 o V O o O y Ny N O O O O M N M V O O a n a d N N 3 £ to M to to M Vi V3 M to to M to to M to M M1 H3 to M to E9 Vi to N O uiwptljolues ,$ uelo!uyoal n o a o 0 o v y Utlo Joluas ,aaul6u3 ua Isa 1 P. ?J ua0 � N a joluas uelaluyaal adeaspue1 foally0iv adeospuel �n o 0 0 0 o v a ro m hafad �a6euew u6lsap uegjfl r v v a m N uePuyool Ra—s-luas joAe,ns d 4oafad o 0 0 0 0 m E (dlnb3lm) II m 0 majo Aemns H 0 _ Ja6euew C fa—s uelaluyoei v v o o N J 6uuaaul6u3 a' M N M .aaul6u3 M v N u6lsap N N O R v N O M M M 1 Jaaul6u3 'a foafad v a II iaaul6u3 foafoM r a a aaaul6u3 r ioafoJd •is ,aaul6u3 a v v v v v v v v v a v N a �o!uas Ja6eueyy o u 6uu88ul6u3 led!Ouud N N N N O v V C O O F N O F N O H N Yv£i O F N O F N O F b F F H A ¢ F F F N d E a o = a 0 °' o c U U d o E c In N c 'a ao g U D U w is t r m m E (y T E Q N ~ d£ £ N m N £ d o A N £ E ¢°1� c o ym 3 Q 0 2 N .- m = 0 Io o3i a 3 w a \ 0 N �, cam N w� 3- m 3 8 3 :9 m y? x O y d D a d E o o ao'E@£o E- c'$¢ y S 3 °' me •N E w �Q� m - oo'gEm= E000� o dEd dm� a._ :o yam.-cooE cameo.>v - E„_�o c dom 0 0 d aka Omm--- wzzmw_ Va0�¢ o0 Y � N Y w M Y ¢ � Y � NMv into 1n Y �NM O t"'MMM t0 Y � d FZ � NM�tn (V N(V to � F F F F F F Packet Pc W L X W y C d £ d O E c O W i1 Z W O N N N N ,-- a Z N 0M NI 0 5 # z ❑ ?� c Q W N J LL w E noQ0 Z �_ C V U n N w ; � c d aUa` d LL ...... 0 O V 0 0 C CO, 0 O N Q .... 0 0 V f p 0 0 N N 0 0 t D V O O O O r O] O O O O d i N 0 0 f D 0 0 0 0 1. O O o N N O O 0 o O N O O o O V O O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 O (p N G Y d W N O V O N V V T_ W M I a6 O V r O Ol _ M N __ N N __ t0 LO N w ___ r V N a n d N R d N N 3 E M to to M to M to to M to to EA:A to W to to M V3 Hi H3 to M to to M- 43 to M- O V of V N� O N M N r 0 O fOO M O F � 2 c00 M fOd uiwpy joluaS ueloluyoal �y N N N N O O N N O UVO Mues 1aaul6u3 luaplsaa ua0i joins ue!o!uyoal v a N adeospue� loallyojy ade3spue-1 N V N O N M N O loafad �a6euew u6lsaU ueqjn N N N V Q N N N N ueloluyool R.—S -1, joAe,nS d loafad o 0 m E (dlnb3lm) II N W majo AemnS N o 0 _ ja6eueyy C M Aan�nS ueloluyoal Q Nr O N M Q OMrQOM O N �` N NQ N V N w. M N N MQ�ON a O M O J 6uuaaul6u3 ... u l 6 u 3 M Q � r u6!saU N M N r N N N N N O O N� N O V n a Q NON 1 jaaul6u3 Q loafad II jaau!6u3 ov loafoM a Q a v Q aaaul6u3 O O Ol loafOJd 'iS V N N N N laaul6u3 N N f0 N N Q V N N (O V N JOlua$ ja6eueyy N �NN�O O O O 6uuaaul6u3 A NN V �O N V NMN� m led!3u!ld N Q Q Q Q O O O F O F O F O F O F O H A A A A d E _EE d d E E« R c 07 W m d N E_E_EE� d d N N R w_wwW ❑ wwwW _ w w w 'a w at d o o" y o 0 0 W y d Q U o o d U o o a a c c c o: c.6 -6o i. y a�emmo ;O m mo o o o o u+ u o 0 0 u o o o o = = v m = = =c o x E s c E a :6 ca £ m c £ m cmNu�m q-O cm�u�vi f N Vl N y o c c. c c c d c c c c d c LEL i.FLEEL R�p m d w7 '^ A d7 > - c c rn -c a,N c c0 c o, 07 a -_ _rn E - K��i W E - K� E m -_ O" U d 000t)p m d '- U y y Qc y y. DOD N G dr d m ._ m ❑ W .. m_ do m N ❑ d W c do y Oj O m £ E E o E E `o f as°Um¢ aU n¢ auoa .. aU o. „d„ N d ��3�� d d o m(nmrn o o o m m o o rnmmrnin wrnmw m mmm m¢ m mmrn in �° N roismrn m Z y r � m W Nao of N rnmOirn N o N � N N Packet Pc W L X W C E O E c 0 W iJ Z W O N F C 01 N N 0 0 F- O LL 0 Z N M N F2@)# z13 c Q W N J LL > E m o Q 0 za �«3 V U n N w u C N � N O acla` 0 o 0 0 0 0 0000 0 o O 0 0 0 p O f D 0'J' o 00 to J o O N LL 614 m N m m o Cd V' 0 C w o wo a ___ r V n cl V V W voi N M m O m w O w J f va IY w N M p] W m a d 3 E <» <» w F» w w F» w JA F» w w <» <» w w f» N c 0 o« w F = N N V V W N N N N Y N O. N 3 S .6 0 w N M F % W o o x 7 m d NO2 •- 3 Q c N a y :L N = C n - N ry U!Wpv Joluas m N 'o "�' c '` o t' E 'y U E E a m E - m cw 3 N d� W aJU E c ue!o!uyoal �n o 0 0 m m R UVO Joluas aNi o F R N z � c y 3 Jaau!6u3 E lueplsaa ua0i w o T K rn Joluas > - o a uelolugoal o m c m adeospue, o N d E loallyojv W ade3spue-1 �n N o o N a n m loafoJd Ja6eueW o u6lsea uegJn r M ueloluyool o o 0 JC—SJoluas a v JoAeNnS d loafad m E (dmb3/M) II N W MaJ'J AemnS a H o m N O O U = Ja6eueW 00 C .(aNnS R J N N uelaluyaal 6uu8aul6u3 a o P ;: N o fJ O o y Jaaul6u3 N o a a u6lsea N M I Jaaul6u3 v o 0 a loafad E w w II Jaaul6u3 r 0 loafoJd Jaaul6u3 r 0 loafad •JS Jaaul6u3 v o v 0 N N JOIUas M Ja6eueW N v m N 6uuaaul6u3 Iedlou!ld N O N _ F c N _ F _ F N LL � Y � 0 o c E c 7 o ° a y o a p .a O o OJ m J m _ x o f C 72� N. O W C 'o o is m R W V a o¢ o W R `�' t w a 3 fWm a G t�3m�, a¢ Dam N Q p rn `o 0 ❑ o N ` �==0d Q d N p N m N O V V N f Z o u`oirn 0 c Ul p �2 Jolua 1°. ueioluyoa ,6 c6 cj � pyO Joiva 00 ` Jaaul6u3 45 Lo ,, luepised JOIUa v o o `9 uepluyoa www` odeospue1 p; e m 6 a loaligoJ ,� edeospuel loafad o v N Ja6eueW co v m u6isad n uegJn N ueioluyoa ua w w rw�M Aomn Ime 0 Jo,(anJn loafoJd oo ao m (dmb3/M man N II maJ ReNn v m N w w Ja6eueW ReNn ueiolugoa cow Ja v ` uuaaupu3 i u'> o w H Jaaul6u3 v �2 u6lsed � � v M I Jaaul6u3 v m ; loafad II J99ul6u3 � m�O r loafad n m Jaaul6u3 co w w w loafad IS O v Jaaul6u3 JOlua d 5 n ro O m 0 Ja6eueW a 'Ni� � uuaaui6u3 N a m � mm�w m ' cJ ,6 O v ledpuud N L o o 2 3 O O L o � N od�dm dIL A Packet Pc 8.8.a CPWashington State Department of Transportation May 5, 2022 KPG, P.S. 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Acceptance FYE 2021 ICR — CPA Report Dear Susan Rowe: Development Division Contract Services Office PO Box 47408 Olympia, WA 98504-7408 7345 Underson Way SW Tumwater, WA 98501-6504 TfY:1-800-B33-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov We have accepted your firms FYE 2021 Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) of 173.37% (0.27% Facilities Capital Cost of Money) based on the "Independent CPA Report," prepared by Stambaugh Ness, Inc. This rate will be applicable for WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual basis. Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract. This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with the firm is responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR. If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email consultantrates(a,wsdot.wa.gov. Regards; ERIK K. JONSON Contract Services Manager EKJ: ah Packet Pg. 219 8.8.a 4aGroup Northwest Acquisition and Relocation Services August 1, 2022 SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE: KPG - City of Edmonds 76th Ave. W at 220th St. SW Improvement PROJECT OVERVIEW AND SCOPE OF WORK KPG Inc., is the (PRIME) consultant with RES GROUP NW LLC (RESGNW) serving as a sub -consultant on a project for City of Edmonds 76th Ave. W at 2201h St. SW Improvement Project. The project will improve and widen the intersection by installing a new traffic signal with protected permissive left turn phases for all approaches through the additional eastbound and westbound left turn lanes on 220th St. SW. Additional improvement include wider sidewalk, bike lanes within the intersection, pavement, street lighting, signing, and striping, utility upgrades. It is anticipated that the project requires partial acquisitions of Fee, Permanent and Temporary Easements from 12 larger parcels, ranging in zoning (various commercial, residential, and mix use). It is not anticipated that the acquisition will impact current utilization of the property. The project is currently funded with Federal funds. To ensure the City's ability to use this fund for this project, all acquisition activities will follow Federal Highways Administration policies and procedures as well as all applicable federal, state and local laws, including, but not limited to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Police Act of 1970 and its amendments, 49CFR Part 24, and state Revised Guidelines and by reference the WSDOT Right of Way Manual. Preliminary Right -of -Way Services PROJECT FUNDING ESTIMATE (PFE) AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFER SUMMARY (AOS) Following review of the right-of-way plan, RESGNW will prepare a Funding Estimate and AOS for all impacted parcels. The AOS will utilize consistent comparable sales and valuation techniques. AOS will be written for those acquisitions valued under $25,000 in the PFE. Should any appraisals be required, RESGNW will make a recommendation with cost estimates for appraisal consultants to the Prime or the City. APPRAISAL AND APPRAISAL REVIEW Appraisal and appraisal review contracts shall be handled directly by RESGNW and will make necessary recommendations to the Prime or the City. TITLE REVIEW, CLEARING AND CLOSING RESGNW will review Prime supplied title reports for affected parcel and provide Title Review Memo identifying all potential encumbrances to project team members. RESGNW will assist in clearing the necessary encumbrances prior to closing, if feasible. RESGNW will assist in facilitating in-house closing on low impact parcel or manage closing through escrow should those services become necessary. Acquisition Services RIGHT-OF-WAY DOCUMENTATION, NEGOTIATIONS AND CLOSING RESGNW will assist the Agency in developing all right-of-way documents/offer letters in accordance with the Agency's right-of-way procedures manual for acquisition of impacted properties. RESGNW will draft the acquisition documents using City approved forms or QC any forms that are created directly by City 1913 6th Street, Kirkland, WA 98033 - 624 S Lander Street #202, Seattle, WA 98134 - ■ ph.206-457-5681 ■ www.resgnw.com Packet Pg. 220 8.8.a 4aGroup Northwest Acquisition and Relocation Services staff for pre -acquisition review by the WSDOT LPA coordinator before any offers are made to property owners. REGNW agents will act in good faith at all times and never coerce owners in an attempt to settle the parcels. All negotiations will start with an in -person presentation of all offers when feasible. We will identify property owner issues, concerns and differences early on and document that information in the individual parcel negotiation diaries. RESGNW will work with Agency staff throughout the negotiation process with the property owner until settlement is reached on each parcel. Cost Estimate Payment to RESGNW for its professional services is not dependent upon outcome, the amount or terms of any agreement reached for the property, or on any contractual arrangement between the City and any third party. Prime agrees to compensate RESGNW for actual professional services rendered as follows: Our fees for services are calculated based upon the applicable hourly rates for those professional who perform the work - at -hand. The billing rate is $129.96 per hour for all tasks performed under this agreement. In addition, necessary travel time and mileage will be billed at the current year's IRS standard mileage reimbursement rate. PRELIMINARY FUNDING ESTIMATE, AOS SUMARIES. AND APPRAISALS FE/AOS (2 Parcels) Appraisals (10 Parcels & 1 signe relocation appraisal) Appraisal Reviews (10 parcels) PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CERTIFICATION 50 HOURS NEGOTIATIONS R/W Acquisitions 45 hours per parcel x 12 TITLE REVIEW AND CLEARANCE / CLOSING Senior Acquisition Agents: 8 hours per parcel x12 ODC: Estimated Mileage and Postage Reimbursement TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: KPG $ 2,500.00 $35,500.00 $15,000.00 50 Hours @$129.96 per hour = $ 6,498.00 540 hours @ $129.96 per hour = $ 70,178.40 96 hours @ $129.96 per hour = $12,476.16 RES GROUP NW, LLC 1913 6th Street, Kirkland, WA 98033 - 624 S Lander Street #202, Seattle, WA 98134 - ■ ph.206-457-5681 ■ www.resgnw.com $1,200.00 $143,352.56 Packet Pg. 221 8.8.a Y-12358: Northwest Region General Engineering Consultant Services Professional Services Agreement Actuals Not to Exceed (ANTE) Rate Table RES Group NW, LLC 2022-2023 Job Classifications Direct Labor Overhead Fee (Profit) All Inclusive Hourly Rate 76.09% 29% Billing Rate NTE NTE NTE NTE Sr. Acquisition/Relocation Agent $ 69.50 $ 52.88 $ 20.15 $ 142.52 Technician/Jr. Right of Way Agent $ 32.40 $ 24.65 $ 9.40 $ 66.45 Packet Pg. 222 8.8.a CPWashington State Department of Transportation August 11, 2022 RES Group NW, LLC 624 S Lander Street #201 Seattle, WA 98134 Development Division Contract Services Office PO Box 47408 Olympia, WA 98504-7408 7345 Underson Way SW Tumwater, WA 98501-6504 TfY:1-800-B33-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov Subject: Acceptance FYE 2021 ICR — Risk Assessment Review Dear Sonja Davis: Based on Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Risk Assessment review and the economic hardship approved by our WSDOT Audit Office of your Indirect Cost Rate (ICR), we have accepted your proposed FYE 2021 ICR of 76.09%. This rate will be applicable for WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual basis. Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract. This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with your firm is responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR. If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email consultantrates(&wsdot.wa.gov. Regards; / fz- Aug 15, 2022 ERIK K. JONSON Contract Services Manager EKJ:mya Packet Pg. 223 8.8.a LALANDAU August 5, 2022 KPG, Inc. 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98121 Attn: Nandez Miller, PE Transmitted via email to: nandezC&kpq.com Re: Proposed Scope of Services and Cost Estimate Environmental Permitting Support Services City of Edmonds 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Edmonds, Washington Dear Nandez: Landau Associates, Inc. (Landau) is pleased to submit this proposed scope of services and cost estimate for the 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements project in Edmonds, Washington (project). The proposed scope of services presented in this letter is based on discussions with and information provided by KPG, Inc. (KPG). Presented below is a summary of Landau's project understanding and the proposed scope of services. Project Understanding The City of Edmonds (City) is proposing the 761h Avenue West at 2201h Street SW Intersection Improvements project, which will improve and widen the intersection by installing a new traffic signal with protected -permissive left -turn phases for all approaches through the addition of eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes on 220th Street SW. A southbound right -turn lane will also be added along 76th Avenue West to further enhance the intersection level of service. Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bicycle lanes within the intersection, pavement, street lighting, signing and striping, and utility upgrades (including water and stormwater upgrades, along with potential conversion of overhead utility lines to underground). Landau provided initial National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) support for the project, including submittal of Area of Potential Effect (APE) and Endangered Species Act (ESA) No Effect determination technical memoranda in 2021. The response from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation indicated that an additional survey may be needed, and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) updated its ESA effect determination guidance in June 2022 that includes revised procedures for assessing effects from stormwater. The improvements will require acquisition of right-of-way and will be receiving federal funds. The City has requested support with environmental documentation associated with the project. 155 NE 100th St, Ste 302 • Seattle, WA 98125 • 206.631.8680 • www.landauinc.com Packet Pg. 224 8.8.a Proposal: KPG/City of Edmonds/761h Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Landau Associates Proposed Scope of Services The following tasks define Landau's proposed scope of services to support environmental permitting for the proposed project. Task 1: WSDOT Local Programs NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form Landau will prepare a preliminary version of the WSDOT Local Programs NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) Form (formerly the Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary). The purpose of the preliminary NEPA CE form is to facilitate discussion with WSDOT Local Programs to determine subsequent NEPA compliance needs. To complete the preliminary version of the CE form, Landau will compile and review environmental information from readily available public domain resources to gain a general understanding of relevant environmental resources along the project corridor. The CE form will require a discussion of stormwater runoff treatment and detention, which will be based on the stormwater design report to be provided by KPG. This task includes preparation of a letter describing the APE in support of Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act compliance. The letter will include a figure outlining the project area and will support an evaluation of applicable Section 106 exemption. This task includes participation by a Landau Senior Associate in a NEPA kickoff meeting with staff from the City and WSDOT Local Programs. The final version of the project NEPA CE form will be prepared after the kickoff meeting and preparation of supporting documentation provided under the tasks described below. Assumptions • Federal funding will be provided by the Federal Highway Administration distributed through WSDOT Local Programs. • The NEPA kickoff meeting will occur after the preliminary version of the CE form has been prepared. • NEPA documentation prepared in association with federal funding will be adopted as the State Environmental Policy Act determination of non -significance pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-610. • The project will not require preparation of individual discipline reports associated with air quality conformity/greenhouse gases, wetlands/waterways, Section 6f resources, Section 4(f), cultural/historic resources, or agricultural lands. Deliverables • An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the preliminary and final NEPA CE form. • An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the APE letter and associated figure. August 5, 2022 2 Packet Pg. 225 8.8.a Proposal: KPG/City of Edmonds/761h Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Landau Associates Task 2: Traffic Noise Assessment Landau will conduct a traffic noise assessment of the project corridor for potential noise impacts to sensitive receivers within the project study area. The traffic noise assessment will include the following components: • Pre -Consultation with WSDOT: Before conducting field work or traffic noise model (TNM) development, Landau will consult with WSDOT noise specialists, if necessary, to confirm the appropriate number of modeling receptors and noise validation measurement locations. • Noise Measurements for TNM Model Validation: Noise measurements will be collected along selected existing roadway segments that may be affected by the proposed project. The collected data will be used for model validation as part of the noise assessment. • Noise Assessment: Noise levels will be predicted for the existing road (the "no -build" alternative) and one "build" alternative. The City planning department will be consulted to determine the locations for which residential building permits have been issued for any vacant lots adjacent to the roadway. A land -use inventory will be conducted to identify the existing and currently -permitted future noise -sensitive land uses and to assist in selection of noise modeling locations. Representative receiver locations will be modeled for prediction of noise levels and determination of noise impacts. Landau will incorporate provided traffic data into the model. The traffic noise impact criteria against which the project traffic noise levels will be evaluated will be from WSDOT's 2020 Traffic Noise Assessment and Abatement Policy guidance manual. • Noise Barrier Analysis: If the noise analysis indicates impacts in areas where noise abatement measures are constructible, then Landau will use the TNM model to determine the height and length of noise barrier walls that satisfy WSDOT's acoustical feasibility criteria. Landau will estimate the construction cost of each wall by using WSDOT's unit cost factor and will determine the economic reasonableness based on the number of benefited receivers shielded. For budgetary purposes, based on inspection of preliminary aerial photographs, Landau assumes that up to three separate noise walls will be evaluated. Landau will coordinate with the civil engineering design team to provide the required heights, top elevations, and lengths of each noise wall that satisfy both the feasibility and reasonableness criteria. Noise Discipline Report: Landau will prepare a technical report summarizing the findings of the noise assessment. The contents will include descriptions of land use in the project area, existing noise conditions, methods of analysis, impacts, and evaluated noise mitigation measures. Mitigation cost estimates will be included, and construction noise impacts will be discussed. The report will also include maps of the existing and proposed alignments, as well as existing and proposed future land uses, on a scaled vicinity map. Comparative tables will be prepared to aid in understanding project impacts and mitigation. A draft report will be submitted to the City for review. Landau will then revise the report based on the City's consolidated comments and submit it to WSDOT for review. Landau will respond to WSDOT comments to prepare the final report. Assumptions Landau will conduct validation modeling for up to three receiver locations, and noise modeling for no more than 10 receiver locations. • Peak hour Existing Year, No Build, and Build Year traffic volumes will be provided to Landau August 5, 2022 3 Packet Pg. 226 8.8.a Proposal: KPG/City of Edmonds/761h Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Landau Associates • Landau will provide a letter for the City to distribute to noise -sensitive receivers (i.e., residences, businesses, etc.) seeking permission to complete noise field measurements. • Efforts to collect noise measurements from building interiors or balconies are not included in this scope of services. Deliverables • An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the City -review draft noise technical report. • An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the WSDOT-review draft noise technical report. • An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final noise technical report. Task 3: Biological Assessment, Section 7 Endangered Species Act; Magnuson - Stevens Act Essential Fish Habitat Evaluation Landau will prepare a biological assessment (BA) for selected species federally listed as threatened or endangered in the action area under the ESA and an Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) evaluation for the proposed project. Landau will obtain updated species lists from agency websites, request site -specific species and habitat information from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitats and Species database, and review information from the Washington Natural Heritage Program. Evaluation of specific project details, such as construction techniques and equipment used, timing of construction, and best management practices will be based on information provided by KPG. The BA report will establish the project action area, which will incorporate the farthest extent of both aquatic and terrestrial impacts. Appropriate environmental baseline information and species history will be summarized in the BA. A determination "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" (NLAA) is anticipated. The project is not expected to impact EFH. Landau will prepare a draft BA and EFH evaluation for review and comment by KPG and the City, and then a final document. Assumptions • The BA will be drafted using the current WSDOT template. • A 30 percent to 60 percent level of design will be sufficient for preparation of the BA and EFH evaluation report. • The project will have a NLAA determination on listed species and/or their designated critical habitat and a formal Biological Opinion will not be required. The project will have no adverse impact to EFH. • WSDOT BA procedures for calculating the extent of in -water impacts will be used; this task includes water quality modeling using HI -RUN modeling software. In -water construction will not be required as part of the proposed project. • This task does not include meetings with agency staff from the US Fish & Wildlife Service or National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries. August 5, 2022 4 Packet Pg. 227 8.8.a Proposal: KPG/City of Edmonds/761h Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Landau Associates • Design and construction details required for permit applications that are not directly related to a critical areas determination will be provided to the Landau biologist. Such elements include, but are not limited to, a stormwater drainage report; a temporary sediment and erosion control plan; proposed construction timing, sequencing, and duration; and primary types and duration of construction equipment to be used. • This task does not include efforts to conduct a 6-month update review of species listings. • The scope of work does not include monitoring of any federally listed or state listed species during construction activities. Should any monitoring of these species be required, an addendum to this scope and budget can be prepared. Deliverables • Electronic (Adobe PDF) copies of the draft and final BA and EFH Evaluation report. Task 4: Environmental Justice Landau will prepare the WSDOT Environmental Justice — Decision Matrix to assist the project team in determining whether minority or low-income groups or individuals should be targeted during the project's public involvement process. Based on available existing demographic information, Landau will inventory the population potentially impacted by the project to determine the extent of populations that conform to US Department of Transportation (DOT) definitions for "minority" and "low-income." Landau will examine US Census block information for the project area and local school district attendance records, and will compare demographic information of the people within the study area to the larger City/Snohomish County (County) populations to evaluate whether any minority or low- income populations reside within the project limits that exceed the characteristics of the City and/or County as a whole. Landau will also prepare a WSDOT Environmental Justice "letter to file" for the proposed project. The letter to file will be prepared in accordance with Section 458 of the WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual. This work will include the following: • A summary of the public involvement that has occurred for the project and documentation of any issues related to minority and low-income populations that have arisen through the project's public involvement process. • A summary of the demographic information. • Evaluation of any disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority or low-income populations as defined by DOT, which will include but not be limited to impacts associated with transportation, housing, community cohesion, and health and social services. • A description of any measures that shall be taken to address disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority or low-income populations. Assumptions • The City will provide sufficient information on the project's public involvement history for Landau to summarize in the report. August 5, 2022 5 Packet Pg. 228 8.8.a Proposal: KPG/City of Edmonds/761h Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Landau Associates • Landau will not conduct door-to-door surveys of impacted dwellings or businesses. Deliverables • An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the decision matrix • Electronic (Adobe PDF) copies of the draft and final Environmental Justice letter to file. Task 5: Screening -Level Hazardous Materials Linear Corridor Assessment Landau will conduct a screening -level assessment of sites along the project corridor for the potential presence of contamination. The screening -level assessment of the project corridor will include the following components: • Reviewing available aerial photographs to assess past uses of the project corridor and adjacent properties from the present back to their first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. • Reviewing listings from a subcontracted database service (Environmental Data Resources Inc.) of confirmed and suspected contaminated sites within a 1-mile radius of the project corridor abstracted from US Environmental Protection Agency, tribal, and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) environmental databases. • Reviewing reports documenting previous environmental investigations completed at sites along the project corridor (if provided by the City and/or WSDOT). • Conducting a site reconnaissance of the project corridor to visually and physically observe current land -use activities and environmental conditions from the project right-of-way. • Requesting and reviewing information from Ecology, if necessary, to further evaluate the sites of potential hazardous and problem waste concerns for the project that were identified in the regulatory database search or site reconnaissance. The data collected through performance of this task will be summarized in a technical memorandum. Assumptions • A hazardous materials report to address hazardous and problem waste may be required by WSDOT based on its review of the preliminary CE form. Preparation of a hazardous materials report is not included in this scope of services. The level of detail and report format for a hazardous materials report is dependent on the project activities, and type and number of potential hazardous material impacts identified. A scope and cost estimate to complete a hazardous materials report, if required by WSDOT, will be provided after receipt of review comments from WSDOT regarding the preliminary CE form. • The screening -level hazardous materials linear corridor assessment technical memorandum will not meet the requirements of a Phase I environmental site assessment under ASTM International standard E1527-13. • Building interiors will not be accessed as part of the site reconnaissance. • Conditions at immediately adjacent properties may not be observable from public access areas and, as a result, may not be identified during the site reconnaissance. • Please note that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, file reviews at the agency level have been experiencing extensive delays and may require 3 months or more to complete. If file reviews cannot be completed by the time the screening -level hazardous materials linear corridor August 5, 2022 6 Packet Pg. 229 8.8.a Proposal: KPG/City of Edmonds/761h Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Landau Associates assessment is published, the lack of file review may be identified as a data gap and its significance in relation to the opinions and conclusions of the report would be noted. Deliverables • An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the draft screening -level hazardous materials linear corridor assessment technical memorandum. • An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final screening -level hazardous materials linear corridor assessment technical memorandum. Task 6: Cultural/Historic Resources Landau will subcontract with Cultural Resource Consultants, LLC (CRC) to provide cultural/historic resources support. CRC will conduct background research, a limited site evaluation, and prepare a report for cultural/historic resources compliance. Assumptions • Preparation of historic property inventory forms is not included in this scope of services. Deliverables • An electronic (Microsoft Word) copy of the draft cultural/historic resources assessment technical memorandum. • An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final cultural/historic resources assessment technical memorandum. Estimated Cost Landau estimates the cost for these proposed scope of services will be approximately $48,100 as detailed in the table below. Project Task Budget Task 1: WSDOT Local Programs NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form $4,000 Task 2: Traffic Noise Assessment $19,800 Task 3: Biological Assessment and Essential Fish Habitat Evaluation $8,800 Task 4: Environmental Justice $2,700 Task 5: Screening -Level Hazardous Materials Linear Corridor Assessment $6,900 Task 6: Cultural/Historic Resources $ 5,900 Project Total $48,100 Landau proposes to provide the above -described services on a cost -plus -fixed -fee basis according to the budget set forth above and the attached fee determination tables. It is possible that the level of effort actually required to complete a specific scope item will differ from that currently being assumed, and Landau may need to reallocate authorized budget amounts between the various tasks or request additional budget as required to meet the needs of the project. August 5, 2022 7 Packet Pg. 230 8.8.a Proposal: KPG/City of Edmonds/761h Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project Landau Associates In the event the project requirements change, or unexpected conditions are disclosed that appear to require further field effort, study, or analysis, Landau will bring these to your attention and seek your written approval for an addendum to the scope of services and costs prior to performing additional services. Authorization Landau anticipates that you will develop a subconsultant agreement consistent with other agreements between KPG and Landau to formalize our working relationship on this project. Please let us know how we can assist you in that process. Landau appreciates the opportunity to work with KPG and the City of Edmonds on this project. Please contact me if you have any questions about our proposed scope of services and budget for this project. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. 4wrl&� Amy Maule Senior Scientist emu.: Steven Quarterman Senior Associate Ecologist AEM/SJQ/KMS/ccy 2023-0399 \\edmdata02\Proposals\C_Edmonds\2021-01_76th Ave and 220th St SW Improvements\Proposal\2022\Landau_City of Edmonds 76th-220th_prop - 08-05-22.docx Attachments Table 1: Fee Determination Table — WSDOT Local Programs NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form Table 2: Fee Determination Table —Traffic Noise Assessment Table 3: Fee Determination Table — Biological Assessment Table 4: Fee Determination Table — Environmental Justice Table 5: Fee Determination Table — Screening -Level Hazardous Materials Linear Corridor Assessment Table 6: Fee Determination Table — Cultural/Historic Resources August 5, 2022 8 Packet Pg. 231 8.8.a Table 1: WSDOT Local Programs NEPA Categorical Exclusion Form Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Subconsultant: Landau Associates Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification (b) Hours Principal* 1 Senior Associate 16 Associate Senior Senior Project Project Senior Staff Staff/Senior Technician II Assistant/Senior Technician I Project Coordinator 4 Data Specialist CAD/GIS Technician Support Staff Reimbursables = Typical Rate (a) = Cost X $91.35 $91.35 X $65.39 $1,046.24 X $56.01 $0.00 X $48.08 $0.00 X $47.36 $0.00 X $36.06 $0.00 X $32.70 $0.00 X $33.00 $0.00 X $24.00 $0.00 X $38.50 $154.00 X $38.47 $0.00 X $45.35 $0.00 X $25.75 $0.00 Total Direct Salary = $1,291.59 Overhead Cost @ 180.98% of Direct Labor Cost (c) = $2,337.52 Fixed Fee @ 30% of Direct labor Cost = $387.48 Total Direct Labor = $4,016.59 Travel Expenses (est. ## miles @ $0.56/mile IRS) $0.00 Reproduction Expenses $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subconsultant Total Prepared By: SJQ Date: 7/29/2022 _ $4,016.59 (a) Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category listed. Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each employee may have a different hourly rate of pay. Employee compensation is subject to adjustment annually. (b) Classifications shown are general, the actual invoice will show our employee's specific discipline for e.g., Senior Engineer, Senior Geologist, Senior Planner. (c) Per WSDOT analytical review of Landau Associates' financial statements for the year ended 6/30/21. * Excludes CEO Packet Pg. 232 8.8.a Table 2: Traffic Noise Assessment Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Subconsultant: Landau Associates Direct Salary Cost (DSQ Classification (b) Hours = Typical Rate (a) = Cost Principal* X $91.35 $0.00 Senior Associate 15 X $65.39 $980.85 Associate X $56.01 $0.00 Senior 74 X $48.08 $3,557.92 Senior Project X $47.36 $0.00 Project X $36.06 $0.00 Senior Staff 40 X $32.70 $1,308.00 Staff/Senior Technician II X $33.00 $0.00 Assistant/Senior Technician I X $24.00 $0.00 Project Coordinator 6 X $38.50 $231.00 Data Specialist X $38.47 $0.00 CAD/GIS Technician 6 X $45.35 $272.10 Support Staff X $25.75 $0.00 Total Direct Salary = $6,349.87 Overhead Cost @ 180.98% of Direct Labor Cost (c) = $11,491.99 Fixed Fee @ 30% of Direct labor Cost = $1,904.96 Total Direct Labor = $19,746.83 Reimbursables: Travel Expenses (est. 20 miles @ $0.56/mile IRS) $11.20 Equipment $83.67 Subconsultant Total = $19,841.70 Prepared By: SJQ Date: 7/29/2022 (a) Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category listed Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each employee may have a different hourly rate of pay. Employee compensation is subject to adjustment annually. (b) Classifications shown are general, the actual invoice will show our employee's specific discipline for e.g., Senior Engineer, Senior Geologist, Senior Planner. (c) Per WSDOT analytical review of Landau Associates' financial statements for the year ended 6/30/20. Excludes CEO 02/26/21 \\edmdata02\Proposa1s\C_Edmonds\2021-01_76th Ave and 220th St SW Improvements\Proposal\2022\Table2_FeeDetermination Landau Associates Packet Pg. 233 8.8.a Table 3: Biological Assessment Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Subconsultant: Landau Associates Direct Salary Cost (DSQ Classification (b) Hours = Typical Rate (a) = Cost Principal* 1 X $91.35 $91.35 Senior Associate 36 X $65.39 $2,354.04 Associate X $56.01 $0.00 Senior X $48.08 $0.00 Senior Project X $47.36 $0.00 Project X $36.06 $0.00 Senior Staff X $32.70 $0.00 Staff/Senior Technician II X $33.00 $0.00 Assistant/Senior Technician I X $24.00 $0.00 Project Coordinator 6 X $38.50 $231.00 Data Specialist X $38.47 $0.00 CAD/GIS Technician 3 X $45.35 $136.05 Support Staff X $25.75 $0.00 Total Direct Salary = $2,812.44 Overhead Cost @ 180.98% of Direct Labor Cost (c) = $5,089.95 Fixed Fee @ 30% of Direct labor Cost = $843.73 Total Direct Labor = $8,746.13 Reimbursables: Travel Expenses (est. 0 miles @ $0.56/mile IRS) $0.00 Reproduction $30.81 Subconsultant Total = $8,776.94 Prepared By: SJQ Date: 7/29/2022 (a) Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category listed Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each employee may have a different hourly rate of pay. Employee compensation is subject to adjustment annually. (b) Classifications shown are general, the actual invoice will show our employee's specific discipline for e.g., Senior Engineer, Senior Geologist, Senior Planner. (c) Per WSDOT analytical review of Landau Associates' financial statements for the year ended 6/30/20. Excludes CEO 02/26/21 \\edmdata02\Proposa1s\C_Edmonds\2021-01_76th Ave and 220th St SW Improvements\Proposal\2022\Table3_FeeDetermination Landau Associates Packet Pg. 234 8.8.a Table 4: Environmental Justice Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Subconsultant: Landau Associates Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification M Hours = Typical Rate (a) _ Principal* 1 X $91.35 Senior Associate 10 X $65.39 Associate X $56.01 Senior X $48.08 Senior Project X $47.36 Project X $36.06 Senior Staff X $32.70 Staff/Senior Technician II X $33.00 Assistant/Senior Technician I X $24.00 Project Coordinator 3 X $38.50 Data Specialist X $38.47 CAD/GIS Technician X $45.35 Support Staff X $25.75 Total Direct Salary = Overhead Cost @ 180.98% of Direct Labor Cost (c) _ Fixed Fee @ 30% of Direct labor Cost = Total Direct Labor = Reimbursables: Travel Expenses (est. 0 miles @ $0.56/mile IRS) Reproduction Subconsultant Total Prepared By: SJQ Date: 8/18/2022 (a) Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category listed Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each employee may have a different hourly rate of pay. Employee compensation is subject to adjustment annually. (b) Classifications shown are general, the actual invoice will show our employee's specific discipline for e.g., Senior Engineer, Senior Geologist, Senior Planner. (c) Per WSDOT analytical review of Landau Associates' financial statements for the year ended 6/30/21 " Excludes CEO Cost $91.35 $653.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $115.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $860.75 $1,557.79 $258.23 $2,676.76 $0.00 $23.24 $2,700.00 02/26/21 X:\C_Edmonds\2021-01_76th Ave and 220th St SW Improvements\Proposal\2022\Table4_FeeDetermination Landau Associates Packet Pg. 235 8.8.a Table 5: Screening -Level Hazardous Materials Linear Corridor Assessment Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Subconsultant: Landau Associates Direct Salary Cost (DSQ Classification (b) Hours = Typical Rate (a) = Cost Principal* 2 X $91.35 $182.70 Senior Associate 2 X $65.39 $130.78 Associate X $56.01 $0.00 Senior 10 X $48.08 $480.80 Senior Project X $47.36 $0.00 Project X $36.06 $0.00 Senior Staff 24 X $32.70 $784.80 Staff/Senior Technician II X $33.00 $0.00 Assistant/Senior Technician I X $24.00 $0.00 Project Coordinator 6 X $38.50 $231.00 Data Specialist X $38.47 $0.00 CAD/GIS Technician 6 X $45.35 $272.10 Support Staff X $25.75 $0.00 Total Direct Salary = $2,082.18 Overhead Cost @ 180.98% of Direct Labor Cost (c) = $3,768.33 Fixed Fee @ 30% of Direct labor Cost = $624.65 Total Direct Labor = $6,475.16 Reimbursables: Travel Expenses (est. 20 miles @ $0.56/mile IRS) $11.20 EDR Report $360.00 Reproduction $3.68 Subconsultant Total = $6,850.04 Prepared By: SJQ Date: 7/29/2022 (a) Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category listed Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each employee may have a different hourly rate of pay. Employee compensation is subject to adjustment annually. (b) Classifications shown are general, the actual invoice will show our employee's specific discipline for e.g., Senior Engineer, Senior Geologist, Senior Planner. (c) Per WSDOT analytical review of Landau Associates' financial statements for the year ended 6/30/20. Excludes CEO 02/26/21 \\edmdata02\Proposa1s\C_Edmonds\2021-01_76th Ave and 220th St SW Improvements\Proposal\2022\Table5_FeeDetermination Landau Associates Packet Pg. 236 8.8.a Table 6: Cultural/Historic Resources Fee Determination Summary Sheet Project: 76th Avenue West at 220th Street SW Intersection Improvements Subconsultant: Landau Associates Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification (b) Hours Principal* Senior Associate 8 Associate Senior Senior Project Project Senior Staff Staff/Senior Technician II Assistant/Senior Technician I Project Coordinator 2 Data Specialist CAD/GIS Technician Support Staff Reimbursables = Typical Rate (a) = Cost X $91.35 $0.00 X $65.39 $523.12 X $56.01 $0.00 X $48.08 $0.00 X $47.36 $0.00 X $36.06 $0.00 X $32.70 $0.00 X $33.00 $0.00 X $24.00 $0.00 X $38.50 $77.00 X $38.47 $0.00 X $45.35 $0.00 X $25.75 $0.00 Total Direct Salary = $600.12 Overhead Cost @ 180.98% of Direct Labor Cost (c) = $1,086.10 Fixed Fee @ 30% of Direct labor Cost = $180.04 Total Direct Labor = $1,866.25 Travel Expenses (est. ## miles @ $0.56/mile IRS) $0.00 Reproduction Expenses Cultural Resource Consultants, LLC $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subconsultant Total Prepared By: SJQ Date: 7/29/2022 _ $5,866.25 (a) Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category listed. Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each employee may have a different hourly rate of pay. Employee compensation is subject to adjustment annually. (b) Classifications shown are general, the actual invoice will show our employee's specific discipline for e.g., Senior Engineer, Senior Geologist, Senior Planner. (c) Per WSDOT analytical review of Landau Associates' financial statements for the year ended 6/30/21. * Excludes CEO Packet Pg. 237 8.8.a Ank Washington State '' Department of Transportation March 15, 2022 Landau Associates, Inc. 103 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Acceptance FYE 2021 ICR — CPA Report Dear Ashleigh Walker: Development Division Contract Services Office PO Box 47408 Olympia, WA 98504-7408 7345 Underson Way SW Tumwater, WA 98501-6504 TfY:1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov We have accepted your firms FYE 2021 Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) of 180.98% of direct labor (rate includes 0.13% Facilities Capital Cost of Money) based on the "Independent CPA Report," prepared by Stambaugh Ness. This rate will be applicable for WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual basis. Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract. This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with the firm is responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR. If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email consultantratesna,wsdot.wa.i!ov. Regards; ERIK K. JONSON Contract Services Manager EKJ:ah Exhibit B Packet Pg. 238 8.8.a LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. STATEMENT OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS, AND GENERAL OVERHEAD FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 Financial % of Statement Unallowable Direct Description Expense Costs FAR Ref Total Proposed Labor Direct Labor $ 4,227,328 $ $ 4,227,328 INDIRECT COSTS Fringe Benefits: Vacation, sick, and holiday Retirement plan Employee group insurance Incentive compensation Payroll taxes Workers compensation Other employee benefits Total Fringe Benefits General Overhead: Indirect labor Accounting Fees Advertising Automobile expense Bank charges Contributions Depreciation and amortization Dues and professional licenses Entertainment Insurance Interest Leased equipment Meals expense Office supplies and postage Professional services Recruitment expense Rent Repairs and maintenance Seminars and professional education Supplies Taxes Telecommunications Travel Recovery accounts Total General Overhead Total Indirect Costs $ 803,951 $ $ 803,951 310,077 310,077 793,836 793,836 1,417,200 (152,350) (1)(2)(3) 1,264,850 (57,034) (15,940) (4) (72,974) 24,269 - 24,269 17,583 (4,559) (5) 13,024 3,137,033 74.20% 3,309,882 (172,849) 3,156,228 (331,712) (6)(7)(8) 2,824,516 49,106 - 49,106 23,397 (23,397) (7) - 56,361 - 56,361 13,475 (13,475) (9) - 10,202 (10,202) (10) - 206,034 4,068 (11)(12) 210,102 65,826 (41,442) (3)(10)(13)(14) 24,384 2,739 (2,739) (5) - 217,294 217,294 38,779 (38,779) (9) - 22,031 - 22,031 3,099 (1,598) (5)(11) 1,501 368,055 (5,230) (7)(12) 362,825 149,183 149,183 195 195 975,574 (4,012) (11) 971,562 50,212 - 50,212 42,634 - 42,634 54,705 (1,309) (12) 53,396 274,850 55,153 (15)(16) 330,003 197,650 - 197,650 15,938 (2,669) (17) 13,269 (126,945) - (126,945) 5,866,622 (417,343) $ 9,176,504 $ (590,192) PPP Loan forgiveness PPP Loan (1,449,444) 508,296 Total Indirect Costs with PPP Loan Forgiveness $ 7,727,060 $ (81,896) Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCM) 5,449,279 128.90% $ 8,586,312 203.11% (18) (941,148) $ 7,645,164 180.85% $ 5,575 0.13% Packet Pg. 239 8.9 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approve Vacation Accrual for Returning Employee Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On September 13, 2022 staff presented this item to the Public Safety -Planning -Human Services - Personnel Committee and it was forwarded to the September 20, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve vacation accrual rate and waive requirement to complete probationary period prior to accrual and use of vacation time. Narrative Mr. Jerry Shuster was originally hired as the Stormwater Program Manager on July 21, 2008. He worked in that capacity until he voluntarily resigned, effective January 18, 2016. According to the City Personnel Policy Section 3.9, "The City may rehire previous employees, provided they performed satisfactorily in their previous employment with the City." While working here, he always received outstanding performance reviews. Recent references were checked as well, and they confirm that he continues to deliver outstanding work and receive outstanding performance reviews. We are fortunate to have an opportunity to bring him back to Edmonds as the Stormwater Engineer. His rehire date will be October 3, 2022. Section 2.35.030 of the ECC outlines the rates of vacation accrual for different amounts of "length of continuous service." In short, as a person works for the city, over the years their rate of vacation accrual increases. In the past, in the case of a rehire, the City has allowed employees to begin their new employment period at the same rate of vacation accrual that they had when they left, rather than make them start over again at a lower accrual rate. Staff is requesting City Council approval for: 1) Mr. Shuster's vacation accrual be based on his prior years of service and position with Edmonds (approximately 7.5 years), effective on his hire date of 10/3/2022. 2) Waive the requirement for him to complete his probationary period prior to the accrual and use of his vacation. This would allow him to begin accruing and using his vacation immediately, which is consistent with what has been done in similar situations in the past. Packet Pg. 240 8.10 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with Landau Associates for the Civic Center Playfield Project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On July 28th, 2021, the City entered into a $39,425.00 contract with Landau Associates to provide geotechnical observation, testing and consultation for the construction of the Civic Center Playfield Project. On December 22nd, 2021, the City entered into Professional Services Supplemental Agreement 1 with Landau Associates for $51,342.00 to cover the increased scope of geotechnical observation, testing and consultation for the construction of the Civic Center Playfield Project. On September 13, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the September 20, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve supplemental agreement. Narrative Professional Services Supplemental Agreement 2 with Landau Associates for $18,665.00 would cover additional observation and testing for the construction of the Civic Center Playfield Project and consultation concerning the westward movement of groundwater from Civic Center Playfield to the Sprague Street pavement and stormwater system. The total fee for the Professional Services Agreement is $109,432.00. The portion of the contract in Supplemental Agreement No. 2 is scheduled to be complete by Spring of 2023. The project costs are being funded by Park Impact Fees, Funds 125, 126 and 132, City General Fund, RCO/Local Parks/YAF grants, LWCF/State grants, Snohomish County grant, Hazel Miller Foundation grant, playground donations, Verdant/Fitness Zone grant and City bonding. Attachments: Attachment 1 - PSA Supplement 2 with Exhibits Packet Pg. 241 8.10.a CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON 121 ST" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 . 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-872-5750 MAYOR Website: www.edmondswa.gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Civic Center Playfield Project WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Landau Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant.", entered into an underlying agreement for design, engineering and consulting services with respect to a project known as Civic Center Playfield Project, dated July 281h, 2021 and amended December 22"a 2021; and WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified; NOW THEREFORE, In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of July 28, 2021 between the parties as amended by Supplemental Agreement No. 1, dated December 2211, 2021 incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement, as amended by Supplemental Agreement No. 1, shall be further amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $39,425.00 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, which was increased by $51,342.00, by the Supplemental Agreement No. 1, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $18,665.00 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $109,432.00 ($39,425.00 plus $51,342.00 plus $18,665.00). 1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying agreement consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B to this addendum, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Packet Pg. 242 8.10.a 2. In all other respects, the underlying agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth in Supplemental Agreements Nos. 1 and 2 but only as set forth herein. DONE this day of , 20 CITY OF EDMONDS LANDAU ASOCIATES, INC. By: By: - - I/J Michael Nelson, Mayor Title: -- ?AjSq>6-4� ATTESTIAUTHENTICATE: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Packet Pg. 243 8.10.a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OFJh� ) On this Z day of e _ , 20 ,, before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State"�f Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared i , to me known to be the Oc4f - r r r. , ,{ of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he.'she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written OTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: '.1EDAISVR•OEPTFS%EngmeenneCapilalICAPITAL PROJECTSTOMA Civic Cmrer Playfie[&Conwrucuon�600 Bids A Comncis\630 ConuactsTmdau-1 a dau Civic Cemer Professi n l Services Supplemental Agreement 2 Rev A doc Packet Pg. 2 47 EXHIBIT A LA LAN 6s.10.a A S S O C I A T E q August 30, 2022 City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave. N Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Mr. Henry Schroder, PE, Capital Projects Manager Re: Change Order Request No. 2 Geotechnical Construction Monitoring Services Civic Center Playfield Edmonds, Washington Landau Project No. 0074211.010.011 Dear Mr. Schroder: Since September 2021, Landau Associates, Inc. (Landau) has provided geotechnical construction monitoring services in support of the Civic Center Playfield project in Edmonds, Washington (site). Services have been performed in accordance with the scopes outlined in the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Edmonds (City, project owner) and Landau, dated July 28, 2021, and Supplemental Agreement 1, dated December 22, 2021. The original and supplemental scopes include the following services: • 10 part-time site visits to observe subgrade overexcavation. • 6 part-time site visits to observe subgrade preparation. • 10 full-time site visits to observe fill placement and compaction. • 5 full-time site visits to observe utility trench construction. • 8 full-time site visits to observe other construction activities. • A contingency equal to 15 percent of the supplemental budget (proportionally equivalent to three additional, full-time site visits). The above scope items are roughly equivalent to 34 full-time site visits. As of this writing, Landau has completed 79 full- and part-time site visits and has exhausted its authorized budget. Landau requests a $18,665 change order to finance the following additional services requested by the City: • 2 full-time visits to observe subgrade preparation and fill placement associated with the restroom facility. • 1 part-time site visit to observe preparation of the grade beam subgrade. • 1 part-time site visit to observe preparation of the pump pit subgrade. • 1 full-time site visit to observe pump pit backfill placement and compaction. • 2 part-time site visits to observe preparation of the seat terrace subgrade. 155 NE 100th St, Ste 302 • Seattle, WA 98125 • 206.631.8680 • www.landauinc.com Packet Pg. 245 8.10.a Change Order Request No. 2 Landau Associates • 2 part-time site visits to observe preparation of the seat wall subgrade. • 3 part-time site visits for additional, as -needed tasks. • Geotechnical consultation related to groundwater expressions in the pavement in Sprague Street and groundwater infiltration into stormwater drainage structures at the site (limited to 4 hours). • Design recommendations for construction of a groundwater cutoff grout curtain at the western boundary of the park, near Sprague Street (limited to 6 hours). If you have questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at 425.329.0251 or at sgertz@landauinc.com. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Sean M. Gertz, PE Senior Engineer SMG/SRW August 30, 2022 2 Packet Pg. 246 EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION SCHEDULE - 2022 8.10.a LA L A N D A A 5 5 0 C I A T E 5 Personnel Labor Hourly Rate Senior Principal 305 Principal 285 Senior Associate 265 Associate 240 Senior 215 Senior Project 195 Project 175 GIS Analyst / CAD Designer 175 Senior Staff 160 Staff / Senior Technician II 145 Data Specialist 145 CAD / GIS Technician 135 Project Coordinator 125 Assistant / Senior Technician 1 115 Technician 100 Support Staff 85 Expert professional testimony or the preparation thereof for court, deposition, declaration, arbitration, or public testimony is charged at 1.5 times the hourly rate. Rates apply to all labor, including overtime. Equipment Field, laboratory, and office equipment used in the direct performance of authorized work is charged at unit rates. A rate schedule will be provided on request. Subcontractor Services and Other Expenses Subcontractor billing and other project expenses incurred in the direct performance of authorized routine services will normally be charged at a rate of cost plus a twelve percent (12%) handling charge. A higher handling charge for technical subconsultants and for high -risk field operations may be negotiated on an individual project basis; similarly, a lower handling charge may be negotiated on projects requiring disproportionally high subconsultant involvement. Invoices Invoices for Landau Associates' services will be issued monthly. Interest of 1% percent per month (but not exceeding the maximum rate allowable by law) will be payable on any amounts not paid within 30 days. Term Unless otherwise agreed, Landau Associates reserves the right to make reasonable adjustments to our compensation rates over time (e.g., long-term continuing projects). T: Templates\Contracts\2022 Compensation Schedule Landau Associates Packet Pg. 247 8.11 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with Herrera Environmental Consultants for the Stormwater Management Action Plan (SMAP) Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On October 25, 2022 the City entered into an agreement with Herrera Environmental Consultants to provide services for the Stormwater Management Action Plan in the amount of $97,090. On September 13, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the September 20, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve supplemental agreement. Narrative The Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) now requires that their receiving water prioritization process be used by all Phase II cities, which includes the City of Edmonds (City), to meet the requirements of S5.C.1.d.ii of the Western Washington Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater permit (Phase II permit). The approach taken to complete this prioritization process follows Ecology's Stormwater Management Action Planning (SMAP) Guidance manual, with data that reflect Edmonds priorities, resident feedback, and the Edmonds specific drainage basins. The City is retaining the services of Herrera Environmental so that it can meet these requirements within the dictated timelines set by DOE and keep the City's NPDES permit compliant. Herrera was selected because this document is one of the sections/parts of the City's upcoming Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Update, which was in the early phases of scope development, and Herrera Environmental had been selected to provide these services. Due to the imposed DOE requirements and timelines, portions of the SMAP needed to be started as soon as possible, which required that at least a portion of the scope of work be brought under contract to meet the timelines. This scope and fee covered work that was required to be completed by June 2022. This left the scoping of the remainder of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Update and SMAP work on hold until the City finds a replacement for the currently vacant Stormwater Engineer position. It was originally hoped that the Stormwater Engineer position would have been filled by this time, and they would have been able to work on the scoping of the last part of the SMAP scope and fee and also Packet Pg. 248 8.11 the scope and fee for the remainder of the Stormwater Comprehensive plan update, but unfortunately this has not happened. In order to ensure that the City continues to meet the SMAP timelines and be compliant with their NPDES permit requirements, Herrera has provided the City with a scope and fee to cover the costs of finishing the SMAP task. The original scope and fee was $97,090. Per the attached negotiated scope of services, the additional fees to finish the SMAP are $85,022, bringing the total cost to $182,112. All project costs will be funded by the 422 Stormwater Utility Fund. Attachments: Attachment 1- Supplemental Agreement with Herrera Packet Pg. 249 8.11.a CITY OF EDMONDS MIKE NELSON 121 5T" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR Website: www.edmondswa.gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Stormwater Management Action Plan WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Herrera Environmental Consultants, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", entered into an underlying agreement for design, engineering and consulting services with respect to a project known as Stormwater Management Action Plan, dated October 25, 2021; and WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified with regard to providing Receiving Water Assessment and Prioritization services, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of October 25, 2021 between the parties, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying Agreement shall be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $97,090 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $85,022 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $182,122 ($97,090 plus $85,022). 1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying Agreement consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B to this supplemental agreement, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 2. In all other respects, the underlying Agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth in this Supplemental Agreement 1, but only as set forth herein. Packet Pg. 250 8.11.a DONE this day of , 20 CITY OF EDMONDS HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Michael Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) Theresa Wood, Vice President On this day of , 20 , before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Pg. 251 8.11.a EXHIBIT A - SCOPE CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN The City of Edmonds (the City) authorized Herrera Environmental Consultants (Herrera) to prepare a scope of services and cost estimate outlining services that Herrera will provide to support the City's Stormwater Management Action Plan (SMAP). Rebecca Dugopolski is Herrera's project manager for this project. Patrick Johnson is the City's project manager. This scope of services includes a discussion of the activities, assumptions, deliverables, and a schedule associated with this project: • Task 3.0 — Stakeholder Involvement and Public Participation .................................... • Task 4.0 — Project Management/Contract Administration.......................................................2 • Task 5.0 — Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Development..................................................3 • Task 6.0 — Stormwater Management Action Plan(SMAP).........................................................4 • Task 7.0 — Contingency..........................................................................................................................8 • Project Budget............................................................................................................................................8 • Project Schedule........................................................................................................................................9 TASK 3.0 — STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Based on the attendance and feedback provided at the Receiving Water Assessment public/stakeholder workshop held earlier in this project, this task will include one additional virtual public/stakeholder workshop scheduled during the lunch hour to gather input on the proposed projects (Task 5.0) and draft SMAP (Task 6.0). The Herrera team will also support up to two City Council meetings (in -person). Assumptions • The StoryMap developed for the initial phase of this project will be updated with the proposed basin/catchment and a short description of the proposed projects R� HERR ERA Q Ed monds_SMAP_Scope_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 September 8, 2022 Page 1 of 9 Packet Pg. 252 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES • City staff will be responsible for advertising for the public/stakeholder meeting • The Herrera team will lead the preparation of PowerPoint slides and handouts for the public/stakeholder workshop • Preparation for the public/stakeholder workshop will include two, 1-hour coordination meetings and one dry run • Up to 2 Herrera team staff will participate in one public/stakeholder workshop (assumed to be 1 hour long and presented virtually) • One Herrera staff will participate in up to two City Council meetings (in -person). Deliverables • Revised draft and final StoryMap • Draft and final agenda for the public/stakeholder workshop (electronic [Word and PDF]) • Draft and final PowerPoint slides for the public/stakeholder workshop (electronic [PowerPoint and PDF]) • Draft and final meeting notes from the public/stakeholder workshop (electronic [Word and PDF]) • Facilitation of one virtual public/stakeholder workshop • Draft and final PowerPoint slides for the City Council meetings (electronic [PowerPoint and PDF]) • Attendance at up to two City Council meetings TASK 4.0 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT/CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Herrera will be responsible for ongoing management and contract administration of this project, including preparing monthly invoices, as well as coordination of work efforts with the City's project manager (Patrick Johnson). Herrera's project manager and contract manager will have phone and e-mail contact with the City's project manager and other City representatives on an as -needed basis with regard to scope, schedule, budget, and invoicing issues. HERRERA Q Edmonds_SMAP_Scope_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 (kji September 8, 2022 Page 2 of 9 Packet Pg. 253 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES This task also includes a project kickoff meeting and regular check -in meetings between the Herrera and City project manager. These meetings are in addition to task -specific meetings outlined in previous tasks. Assumptions • Check -ins will occur on a monthly basis at a minimum, but can be scheduled more frequently as needed. Meetings will be conducted via conference call (or Microsoft Teams). • Herrera and City will provide contact information for project manager back-up should primary contact(s) be unavailable. Deliverables • Draft and final detailed schedule (Microsoft Project) • Project kickoff meeting with City project manager and Herrera project manager • Monthly (or more frequent if needed) check -in meetings with City project manager and Herrera project manager • Monthly invoices and progress reports TASK 5.0 — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) DEVELOPMENT Herrera will review the summary sheets from the Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study. If the study projects are determined to be appropriate, the project summary sheets from the study will be revised to update cost estimates. If the study projects are not determined to be appropriate, new projects will be identified. "Stormwater facility retrofits" developed as part of this task may include projects that retrofit existing treatment and/or flow control facilities/best management practices (BMPs), and new flow control or treatment facilities/BMPs that address impacts from existing development. Pursuant to the receiving water assessment and prioritization work, the CIPs developed for the SMAP will include retrofits intended to provide flow control and/or treatment benefits that address and support the goals for the receiving water. Edmonds_5 MAP_Sco pe_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 n� HERRERA September 8, 2022 Page 3 of 9 Packet Pg. 254 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES Herrera will develop draft and final project summary packages that will include a 1-page description of the project, including existing conditions, proposed concept, project benefits, and cost; a 1-page graphic; and a project cost estimate. Assumptions • This task includes up to two, 1-hour conference calls. o Meeting #1 is to review existing retrofit projects and to determine if existing retrofit projects will be updated or if new projects will be identified. o Meeting #2 is to review the results of updating cost estimates of existing retrofit projects, or to review new project opportunities identified through field visits. • Meeting notes will not be prepared for the conference call discussions; however, a list of action items will be developed following each call that will be distributed via e-mail to the project team. • Two Herrera staff will conduct up to one day of field assessment to evaluate existing projects or identify potential new stormwater retrofit projects. • Projects from the Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Retrofit Study will be included in the SMAP, but will not be visited during the field assessment, unless time allows. • City will provide one staff member to accompany Herrera during the field visits. • Herrera will revise cost estimates for up to two existing retrofit projects from the Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Retrofit Study. Herrera will also identify BM type, location, and 10% conceptual design for up to two new retrofit projects if needed. Deliverables • Action items for two conference calls (e-mail summary) • Draft and final project summary packages for up to four existing and/or new retrofit projects (Word, Excel, and/or PDF) TASK 6.0 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN (SMAP) The goal of this task is to develop a SMAP document per the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Permit requirement S5.C1.d.iii and accompanying SMAP Edmonds_SMAP_Scope_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 (kji H E R R E RA September 8, 2022 Page 4 of 9 Packet Pg. 255 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES guidance developed by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). Herrera will develop a SMAP for one priority catchment area/watershed for the City based on the watershed assessment and prioritization completed in 2022. The SMAP must be finalized in time to meet the NPDES Phase II permit deadline of March 31, 2023. Herrera will prepare a draft and final SMAP that includes: • Summary of SMAP background, assessment and prioritization process, and description and map of the selected watershed. A description of the stormwater facility retrofits needed for the watershed, including the BMP types and preferred locations. • Land management/development strategies and/or actions identified for water quality management. Herrera will conduct a high-level analysis of the benefit of increasing flow control requirements for the entire basin. Herrera will work with City staff to identify lands to protect or conserve, opportunities for depaving projects, and other land management opportunities. o SMAP may include identification of lands to protect or conserve from impervious surface conversions or native vegetation removal, and the strategic means for providing the needed protection, which could be addressed via purchase or zoning or land use policy changes, to name a few options. SMAP may also include other zoning or land use policy changes deemed necessary to prevent the water body from maintaining its current designated uses. Targeted, enhanced, or customized implementation of stormwater management actions related to NPDES Phase II Permit Section S5. Herrera will develop maps to assist with determining which targeted, enhanced, or customized stormwater management actions would most benefit the SMAP catchment, including evaluating the following: o Illicit discharge detection and elimination field screening o Prioritization of source control inspections o Operations and maintenance (O&M) inspections or enhanced maintenance of public facilities o Maintenance that requires capital construction of more than $25,000 o Public education and outreach behavior change programs to support SMAP actions for the receiving water or the selected watershed Edmonds_5 MAP_Sco pe_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 n� HERRERA September 8, 2022 Page 5 of 9 Packet Pg. 256 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES o Identified actions shall support other specifically identified stormwater management strategies and actions for the watershed. If applicable, identification of changes needed to local long-range plans, to address SMAP priorities. Herrera will review existing long-range plans to identify changes, if needed. Include a proposed implementation schedule and the determination of the necessary budget to implement SMAP projects and activities. Herrera will work with the City to prioritize retrofits, land management strategies, and targeted, enhanced or customized stormwater management actions; identify costs; and preliminary cost/benefit analysis. After completing this table, a short-term and long-term schedule, costs, and potential funding sources will be developed. o Include facility design, land acquisition, permit fees, installation, O&M, staff, and other resources to support tailored S5.0 activities for the watershed; any desired monitoring and analysis; and administrative support. o Prioritize investments and actions to achieve the quickest and surest possible preservation and/or restoration of designated uses. Develop the SMAP in a way that will expect the investments to meet the goals for the receiving water and can be reasonably implemented over the course of future NPDES Phase II Permit cycles. SMAP budget should identify likely and potential funding sources and a realistic schedule to accomplish progress on both short-term and long-term actions. o Short-term actions (i.e., actions to be accomplished within 6 years). ■ The 6-year timeframe is identified in Growth Management Act (GMA) Capital Facility Planning process. Short-term SMAP actions will help meet water quality goals, but they are a mix of opportunistic efforts (that are the result of other efforts occurring or planned in the area) and strategic projects/activities. These short-term improvements can be helpful in providing visibility to successes and gaining support for continued actions, and will complement the more strategic, long-term approach to meet SMAP objectives. o Long-term actions (i.e., actions to be accomplished within 7 to 20 years). The 20-year timeframe is identified in the GMA Capital Facility Planning process. Long-term SMAP actions and projects are strategic rather than opportunistic. SMAP should include an anticipated schedule for long-term implementation that includes interim steps. This schedule is not intended to be a Permit compliance goal, but rather an indication of the anticipated level of effort that reflects an Edmonds_SMAP_Scope_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 41 H E R R E RA September 8, 2022 Page 6 of 9 Packet Pg. 257 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES understanding of the time and resources required for detailed planning and successful implementation. • A process and schedule to provide future assessment and feedback to improve the planning process and implementation of procedures or projects. Herrera will work with the City to identify assessment and feedback process which may include recommending continued water quality monitoring or expanding existing monitoring. o The process to adaptively manage the SMAP will document the City's progress toward meeting SMAP goals and enables the City to report progress to Council, funders, the public, and Ecology. The process should directly reflect the protection and/or restoration goals that were set for the receiving water. The adaptive management process may also address the process used to develop the SMAP to improve effectiveness of the program. SMAP adaptations are expected over time as the City finds better ways to run the process or learns from implementation. The SMAP may benefit from strategic monitoring, particularly where little data were initially available. The SMAP should include a long-term assessment approach in sufficient detail that it is clear how the City will know and be able to report whether the protection and/or restoration goals are being achieved. The adaptive management process should include implementation tracking and an ongoing assessment of what portion of the planned projects and activities have taken place and how much of the watershed has been addressed. Assumptions • This task includes up to three, 1-hour conference calls. o Meeting #1 is to review the draft list of SWMP enhancements and draft list of land management strategies. o Meeting #2 is to review the draft SMAP actions and prioritize according to costs, feasibility, and time frame for implementation (short term or long term). o Meeting #3 is to review the draft SMAP incorporating the budget, funding sources, timeframe of actions, and adaptive management strategy. Meeting notes will not be prepared for the conference call discussions, however a list of action items will be developed following each call that will be distributed via e-mail to the project team. • The SMAP will include project summary sheets for identified stormwater facility retrofits (developed as part of Task 5.0), management/development strategies, and/or targeted Edmonds_5 MAP_Sco pe_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 n� HERRERA September 8, 2022 Page 7 of 9 Packet Pg. 258 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES non-structural actions. It is anticipated that two to four project summary sheets will be developed for management/development strategies and/or targeted non-structural actions in addition to the project summary sheets developed as part of Task 5.0. • The final SMAP will be provided to the City on or before March 1, 2023. Deliverables • Action items for three conference calls (e-mail summary) • Draft and final project summary sheets for two to four management/development strategies and/or or targeted non-structural actions • Draft, revised draft, and final SMAP (Word and PDF) TASK 7.0 - CONTINGENCY The nature of this project is such that additional technical needs may potentially arise that are pertinent to the overall scope of services. However, the specifics of these needs will not be known until some preliminary work has been accomplished. Examples needs could include: • Additional CIP projects (or analysis to support CIP project development) • Additional site investigation work related to CIP development • Additional meetings with staff • Additional public workshops or City Council meetings. Herrera will provide additional services as requested by and authorized by the City, subject to amendment of the approved scope of services. Herrera shall submit a scope of services amendment and corresponding budget estimate for supplemental services not covered in previous tasks as may be requested by the City. The City shall provide written (e-mail) authorization to proceed with any supplemental services prior to any such work being performed by Herrera. PROJECT BUDGET The estimated project budget is provided in Exhibit B. Edmonds_SMAP_Scope_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 (kji H E R R E RA September 8, 2022 Page 8 of 9 Packet Pg. 259 8.11.a SCOPE OF SERVICES PROJECT SCHEDULE Task Deliverable/Meeting Timeline a Task 3.0 — Stakeholder Draft workshop agenda Jan. 6, 2023 Involvement and Public Draft StoryMap Jan. 13, 2023 Participation Draft workshop slides Jan. 13, 2023 Final workshop agenda Jan. 20, 2023 Final workshop slides Jan. 20, 2023 Public workshop (virtual) Jan. 2023 (TBD) Draft workshop notes 1 week following workshop Final workshop notes 2 weeks following workshop Final StoryMap 2 weeks following workshop Draft City Council slides Feb. 3, 2023 Final City Council slides Feb. 7, 2023 City Council Meeting 41 Feb. 2023 (TBD) Draft City Council slides Mar. 3, 3023 Final City Council slides Mar. 7, 2023 ...............................................................................................................................................3 Council Ci l Meetin.g..#2 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................)................................................................ Mar. 2023 TBD _ . Task 4.0 — Project Draft detailed schedule Sept. 16, 2022 Management/Contract Final detailed schedule Sept. 30, 2022 Administration PM check -in meetings Sept. 2022 through March 2023 Monthly invoices and progress reports Sept. 2022 through March 2023 Task 5.0 — Capital CIP Meeting #1 Sept. 2022 (TBD) Improvement Projects Action items from CIP Meeting #1 1 week following meeting Conduct field reconnaissance Oct. 2022 CIP Meeting 42 Nov. 2022 (TBD) Action items from CIP Meeting #2 1 week following meeting Draft project summary package Dec. 14, 2022 Final project summary package Mar. 6, 2023 Task 6.0 — Stormwater SMAP Meeting #I Sept. 2022 (TBD) Management Action Plan Action items from SMAP Meeting 41 1 week following meeting (SMAP) Draft project summary sheets (programmatic) Dec. 14, 2022 Draft SMAP Dec.14, 2022 SMAP Meeting #2 Jan. 2023 (TBD) Action items from SMAP Meeting #2 1 week following meeting Revised draft SMAP Feb. 7, 2023 SMAP Meeting #3 Feb. 2023 (TBD) Action items from SMAP Meeting 43 1 week following meeting Final project summary sheets (programmatic) Mar. 6, 2023 Final SMAP plan Mar. 6, 2023 Task 7.0 - Continizencv TBD TBD TBD: to be determined a The proposed project timeline assumes that the notice to proceed will be issued on September 13, 2022. HERRERA Q Edmonds_SMAP_Scope_DRAFT_v2_08.31.2022 (bill September 8, 2022 Page 9 of 9 Packet Pg. 260 EXHIBIT B Herrera Environmental Consultants 8/31/2022 Cost Estimate for City of Edmonds Stormwater Management Action Plan Herrera Project No. [21-07723-001] Task No. Herrera Labor based on: Burdened Labor Rates Michaud, Joy Scientist VI $277.83 16 6 24 2 8 46 4 17 14 10 8 4 75 76 Dugopolski, Rebecca Engineer V $237.87 Fontaine, Matthew Engineer V $237.94 Fohn, Mindy Scientist IV $178.44 4 2 4 44 8 62 Wingrove, Katie Engineer III $163.23 18 1 17 10 46 Johnson,Rachel Engineerll $142.15 6 1 115 18 16 156 Jackowich, Pamela Administrative Coordinator IV $135.67 0 0 10 0 10 Maloof, Charles Project Accountant II $119.29 10 10 Total Hours per Task 50 40 190 117 42 439 Subtotal Labor $9,738 I $8,040 1 $32,684 I $21,885 I $7.984 $80,332 Subtotal Herrera Labor $9,738 I $8,040 $32,684 I $21,885 I $7,984 I $80,332 3% Escalation on Herrera Labor in 2023 $292 I $241 $981 $657 I $240 $2,410 Escalated Subtotal Herrera Labor $10,030 I $8,281 $33,665 $22,542 I $8,224 $82,742 Subconsultants Cascadia Consulting Group $0 $2,000 $2,000 Subtotal Subconsultant Cost $o $o $2,000 $0 $o $2,000 Travel and Per Diem (PD) ,Auto Use Mile $0.63 36 44 0 72 152 Subtotal Per Diem 0 $23 $28 $0 $45 S95 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) Camera, digital Day $10.00 1 0 E7= 3 GPS unit (Garmin/Toughbook navig) Day $50.00 1 7 0 3 3% Fee on ODCs $0 $2 $o $0 $5 Subtotal ODCs $o $62 $o $o $=4 $18s Subtotal Per Diem, Lab Costs, and ODCs $0 $84 $28 $0 $169 $280 Grand Subtotal $10,030 $8,365 $35,692 $22,542 $8,392 $85,022 Grand Total = ' Packet Pg. 261 8.12 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with HKA Global, Inc for the Carbon Recovery Project Staff Lead: Pamela Randolph Department: Public Works & Utilities Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History In early March, the City hired HKA Global, Inc. to assist the WWTP Manager with on -call construction management support, analysis of potential change order requests, review of extra costs, disputed work and time extension requests and other services as requested. HKA's initial contract was established March 1, 2022 for $55,000. In May of this year, City staff requested a Supplemental Agreement for $89,175, which was approved. On May 17, 2022, Supplemental Agreement #1 with HKA Global for the Carbon Recovery Project was approved by City Council. On September 13, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the September 20, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve supplemental agreement. Narrative The City hired HKA Global, Inc. to assist the WWTP Manager with on -call construction management support, analysis of potential change order requests, review of extra costs, disputed work and time extension requests and other services as requested. This supplemental agreement will provide additional budget to continue HKA's services on the Carbon Recovery Project. The original HKA contract amount of $55,000, Supplemental Agreement (#1) for $89,175 and the Supplemental Agreement #2 for $124,475 will be managed under the Carbon Recovery Project and subject to the % of ownership. The total HKA on -call contract amount of $268,650 will be shared with our Treatment Plant Partners. The City of Edmonds share ($136,439) will be funded by the Sewer Utility Fund. City of Shoreline $25,490 City of Mountlake Terrace $62,257 Olympic View Water District $44,464 City of Edmonds $136,439 Packet Pg. 262 8.12 Attachments: Attachment 1 - HKA Supplemental Agreement 2 Packet Pg. 263 8.12.a CITY OF EDMONDS r� MIKE NELSON rr4di��-) 121 5T" AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR Website: www.edmondswa.gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery Project WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and HKA Global, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", entered into an underlying agreement for consulting services with respect to WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery Project, dated March 8, 2022 and amended May 23, 2022; and WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified with regard to construction engineering services; NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of March 8, 2022 between the parties, as amended by Supplemental Agreement 1, dated May 23, 2022, both of which are incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is further amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying Agreement, as amended by Supplemental Agreement 1, shall be further amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $55,000 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, and which was increased by $89,175, by Supplemental Agreement 1, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $124,475 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $268,650 ($55,000, plus $89,175, plus $124,475). 1.3 Exhibit A to the underlying Agreement, as amended by Supplemental Agreement 1, consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby further amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit A to this Supplemental Agreement 2, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Packet Pg. 264 8.12.a 2. In all other respects, the underlying Agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth in Supplemental Agreement 1 and 2 but only as set forth therein. DONE this day of , 20 CITY OF EDMONDS HKA GLOBAL INC Michael Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE : Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Henry Spieker, Partner Packet Pg. 265 8.12.a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) a, a On this day of 20 before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of a the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to 3 be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein co mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the c seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Pg. 266 8.12.a 0016rArmil Agreement for Professional Services EXHIBIT A Scope of Services: HKA shall provide the scope of services outlined below: A. Scope: 1. Provide continued consulting services to City of Edmonds Public Works related to the construction of the WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery Project. Services may include analysis of claims and disputed extra work, review of change order requests, time extension requests, review of entitlement, on -call CM support, and other services as requested. B. Budget Estimate: HKA shall provide the services outlined in Section A based on the hourly rates for professional services included in the project fee schedule below: Task Budget Cost Estimate On -Call CM through February 2023 17 Weeks (15 hrs/week) @ $325/hr $82,875 COR / Claim Review through February 2023 80 hrs @ 395/hr $31,600 Management Reserve $10,000 Total $124,475 WWTP Phase 6 Carbon Recovery PROJECT FEE SCHEDULE (January 2022): Partner (Spieker) $ 395 Director (Zimmerman) $ 345 Assoc. Director (Gockel) $ 325 Manager(Rosenker) $ 305 Sr. Assoc. Consultant $ 300 Assoc. Consultant (Hawn) $ 270 The above hourly rates apply to all services performed on the Client's behalf to the nearest quarter of an hour, including travel time. Computerized time and expense reports are included with HKA's monthly billing statements or are otherwise available upon request. HKA reserves the right to review and adjust this Fee Schedule effective January 1 st of each year. Out-of-pocket expenses such as travel, lodging, meals and overnight couriers will be billed at cost. Special project expenses such as laboratory tests, special fees, extra insurance, equipment, materials, charges for outside computer services, etc., will be billed at cost plus 15%. Mileage will be charged at the current U.S. Federal Government rate. Copies of expense receipts are available upon request. C. Retainer: HKA will not require a retainer prior to commencement of services HKA Glnba I Inc. One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, Suite 820 Philadelphia, PA 19103 c d E m a c m E m a a Packet Pg. 267 8.13 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Approve Resolution Declaring Utility Easements as Surplus at 23610 Highway 99 Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On August 9, 2022 staff presented the Release of Easement to the Parks and Public Works Committee. On September 13, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the September 20, 2022 consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve resolution. Narrative RCW 35.94.040 provides a process for disposing of surplus utility property. Through the attached resolution, the City will declare the utility easements as surplus. The disposition of sewer -storm easements located at 23601 Highway 99 will be brought before the full council at a public hearing on September 27, 2022. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Resolution Attachment 2 - Vicinity Map Attachment 3 - Survey of Sewer -Storm Easement Packet Pg. 268 8.13.a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DECLARING AS SURPLUS SEWER AND STORM UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 236TH STREET SW, APPROXIMATELY 176 FEET EAST OF HIGHWAY 99 IN EDMONDS, WASHSINGTON. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds is reviewing a development application for property located at the southeast corner of Highway 99 and 236`k' Street SW, consisting of tax parcel numbers 00451900100201, -202, -203, and -204 (collectively the "Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, in 1962, the city acquired storm utility and sewer utility easements, respectively recorded under auditor's file numbers 1588234 and 1588238 (collectively the "Utility Easements"); and WHEREAS, the Utility Easements encumber the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the city has determined that it no longer needs the Utility Easements to provide continued public utility service to the Subject Property or any other property in the vicinity; and WHEREAS, the city has determined that it has no foreseeable future need for the Utility Easements; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.94.040 provides a process for disposing of surplus utility property; now therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Utility Easements described above are hereby determined to be surplus to the city's needs and are not required for providing continued public utility service. Section 2. Any disposition of the Utility Easements should proceed in accordance with RCW 35.94.040. RESOLVED this day of 32022. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, MIKE NELSON Packet Pg. 269 8.13.a ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 270 8 13b " City of Edmonds 36! 00 L ■ 23 706 23720 m �81 2380 * 23904 73914 IOWA N 8215 =a 23525 v ■ APOLLO APTS VICINITY MAP 23625 3711' 23711M 238TH ST SW 723821■ 23Aw, ,qw 4 23 904 4 i 2341A 2342211 234 ■ 235G� 23508 , 5 fps . 23514, �_ _ . a 235 12 am AMP235 261 f 23635 ry. 3 M # . 23637 237 237 � Amer 23639 8029 � a1o1 0) �P a sow � 6 �z B� 2382� 1� 0� 1� cr'Ii - ��� u 238061 2 7 U82 23811 23815 1 rJ827P 2 1: 3,031 Oj 0 252.60 505.2 Feet 376.2 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is 1 4,514 P B P PP B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accural WGS 1984 Web Mercator_ Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliab © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTIC 1a to 3 "�.•",.• rioumiak 1n ra, fn C Legend m aEi Sections Boundary to fC Sections LU Edmonds Boundary += a+ ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIP ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN =_ — <all other values> L f1S Interstate V Principal Arterial C Minor Arterial; Collector O Local Street; On Ramp 3 O State Highways — <all other values> d -- 0 > O 1 � IZ 2 Q County Boundary Q- 1a Parks ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY WASHII — c ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES .0 ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES City of Edmonds N City of Lynnwood d City of Mountlake Terrace t Unincorporated King Co; Unincor City of Woodway Q Citv of Arlinaton: Citv of Bothell: ( C d Notes s tt t0 r� a Packet Pg. 271 (5. 8.13.c o0*0 < c cn c� o mo v o z m I- cn : ,<,, c� m o � - z n; o A a o ,� �< 2 o o w o 0 O N z Lo co o m c o o '' cn z 2 a N m '� 0 2 m a _ -zi �\ m � z o m o a� n ma zo m _ i rn Z I a cn "i o v (A N m m m n I.- Arn m Z C Sao cry „�o n (7) o o o Lo I� zy n p 00 m C" ZD z I,, cn a z o � rncocn 2 � m Zo I O N Lo n .\ y n o o C) �yz y y a 0 w � o \ V � \ Ci \ \ IV Z7 \ V ok \ 'A 1448_ _ 0 y 4 '\ 7 a r/r//l/C \ Go l F -� I - I -�-- - 442 - - w Ell - � I IC ^: 6' � zI r I Off' I ` A -, I n , 2 --444----------- \\ o Nm r4--N ED ------ _--------442-------__-- ONE WALL c� \ I�v7v71 -Tj ,v I n n m m \\ I�\A77 N \ I -440- I III w ' � z I ww %o Ot '---- T, y ASPHALT CURB ROCK WALL WALKOUT BASEMENT Ir Is g€� \�—— — — — — — — — — ------ T I OVERHANG- _436 - _ Iv _I -,:: J n _ O----- - --- _ -i V I - --- N N N O I I N I v rn rn rn �" �� m k VVV/// Sip-CL / I Z _ I ---------------- I T I z �'// \\ ------------ -- �- -��-- — — — —430� i� z v, p 00 o �i ❑ SDI C,Q ¢ 1 m - --- I - m rm' a - O o J4�"� I �iF 32 -- % 30, O —I -- -- -- w o m y -� / �— — !Tl ----- I ----------- L------------ — -j --------------------- I--------------� --�-- _N WOOD -FENCE - ------ _ I —— — — — — — — — — — — — — ---------- I — --� _ _> E -� --- - o - -- ---- — - - - _ -__ - - - - -------- --- ------------------a -----------------426--- i ��, DUMPSTER = - I o m I �o„ m vN, rn rn rn - - _ _ ROCKERY CONCRETE CURB I -------- r ova I TI I NO ------------------------------ ^ -' °� ---- --- o 4, - - o II �mr- ------------- ----- --I-- -- --- '------------ I ---- , - N \ Y------- , -- -- --'--------- -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — -------------------- ------- Iit 420L rn mu -- I00 00 00 22 --- � V i �SDSD m m � r� SD 1 I aaZ �� N i-----------¢- c� �a !_--- -- -- S 4T n n n n ii----��ra,------------------ n2 1 I Imcn cn � �Do - .1 - �-I O z I I a r y w a �, = I I / I---------�—_ II -------------- N tel m <'' y z I I o/ , � 9) 9) I �, ------------------ -- _ - - - c l CONCRETE CURB i i------- d- - _ _ _ - — - - - I o to CONCRETE CURB_ I ; m �• � �, N i Hoy db o z �• ----==-y ---- �- - -- r R✓� Z m a � � ((�� 1 — / I ---_---- � --� —_-- — _ — � _— _ --- q--- A �I � --_ _— —_Ol--_�—,Np, _ �S -- - -_ ----' N ��R i ®-------------------------4F6-------- ----r4 - --- -- ----= =------�---------------------- --- -- 30� - '� I - --- SS 0 o 1-----I---------- oYO-- \\ y c c cn I I (n Z I I tQj o I —0 t $� eo 00 00 = /---------------- I I /NJ I I I € O i I I I I P I o 0 o rn �' i\ ---- - rn rn I I SON tnC�- 0 I N C O I m I a I -cam 2 y m� cn I Z7� z �1�7Z I z oo ~on z a cn m 2 (m o �� rn on =y zZm �o Wow mo �o mZm r � a o� I I I I O I O ~ i � I I I I I I I I I I Z c ono= a a�apma a a�apma a zm=�� � -^�m � r- � m m z-^�m m z o z�- n1 m Ir�'10 o zc)0Z- rO�^,O�o� z cn �� °°o �� °°o O nAZ =�azo =�azo z mmo O v 000�ro„ 000r" � v -2rn.: � -Zrn.: cn 2 Z�y O can��Z� can��Z� onm cl �o z10)CS N -I zoc)a Zpy&: ZpyCD, om c�Zy --I p�p4Ni �OJ. cOp�pCN.r Dap I Dao I m�p� mcmn�� m m oc�o,? vm'zo �mzo o y 'z = r- n rrl Lei y 0 z oz I I I r I I-------- --- I ` O I N N I I-CTJ__- -- I I o O NaCI �-Too I V 1 -_ i_ `P O :� ZELl II I)oo00 O O Ch I `, I I I Qo OVo C�,.I I I cl) O _ N I I I I I I C7 I I I ` I I I � ay I 30\ kq I I I \ I r+1 I I I I -0- I I I C O V O I I �ZNo O 76TH AVE, W, <_ N -------------- o ?z oa�o 'z�=z oc z N cn o r,i rn° � 2 -- -----432 - rn m t 0 r M N to 3 L rn to C a� W c u N C O 7 O to N m 0 O_ CL Q Packet Pg. 272 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Public Hearing Permanent Design Standards for Multifamily Buildings in the BD2 Zone Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michael Clugston Background On April 21, 2022, the Council approved emergency Ordinance 4256, which adopted interim design standards for multifamily buildings in the BD2 zone. These standards are intended to fill a narrow gap within the wide range of design guidance for projects in the downtown area included in the Comprehensive Plan and development codes to ensure multifamily -only buildings in the BD2 zone are compatible within the downtown area. On June 21, the Council adopted findings supporting the interim standards in order to retain them through October 21. In practice, building permit applications for multifamily -only buildings in the BD2 zone submitted prior to October 21, 2022 must meet the interim design standards while applications submitted after that date will not have to meet the interim standards unless they are replaced with permanent design standards before that date. On June 21, staff was directed to prepare permanent design standards for the multifamily buildings in the BD2 zone and take them through the standard review process for code amendments. The interim BD2 design standards were introduced to the Architectural Design Board on June 29, 2022 and the Planning Board on July 27. On August 3, the ADB recommended several changes to the interim language for inclusion in draft permanent standards and the Planning Board held a public hearing the draft permanent standards on August 10. While Council was considering the additional design standards, a concern was raised about the extent of the Designated Street Front "blue line" in ECDC 16.43.030. Where the 'blue line' is adjacent to a parcel in Map 16.43-1, that parcel must be include commercial uses on at least of portion of the ground floor and meet the other Designated Street Front requirements for ceiling height, transparency at the street, etc. Multiple dwelling units can be located behind or above the commercial space. For parcels that are not adjacent to the 'blue line', the Designated Street Front requirements do not apply. In those instances, buildings can be multifamily -only and do not have to meet the other Designated Street Front standards in ECDC 16.43. On June 1, Council extended the 'blue line' slightly to make a small number of additional parcels subject to the Designated Street Front requirements through interim Ordinance 4262 and then sent that project back to the Planning Board for further analysis. In a joint meeting with the Economic Development Commission on August 10, the Planning Board and EDC were generally supportive of extending the Designated Street Front line to all BD2-zoned parcels and then revisiting the BD zones more fully after the Comprehensive Plan is updated in 2024. The Planning Board is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the map change on September 28 and will forward a recommendation to Council for their consideration before interim Ordinance 4262 expires on December 1, 2022. If the Designated Street Front map is extended to include all BD2 parcels, the permanent design standards for multifamily buildings in BD2 would become unnecessary since multifamily -only buildings Packet Pg. 273 9.1 would no longer be permitted (at least some commercial space would be required on all BD2 ground floors near the sidewalk). If the existing adopted or interim map is retained, multifamily buildings would still be allowed on some parcels where the 'blue line' is not present. Given this uncertainty, completing the permanent BD2 design standard work is recommended since the interim design standards expire before the Designated Street Front map work will be completed (October 21 versus December 1). If the 'blue line' is eventually extended by Council to include all BD2 parcels, that permanent adopting ordinance could repeal the BD2 multifamily design standards if they are no longer needed. Staff Recommendation Staff will provide a brief presentation on the draft permanent BD2 design standards. Council will take public testimony and consider the draft permanent standards, ask clarifying questions, and discuss any further revisions. Given the short timeline needed for adoption of permanent standards prior to October 21 when the interim standards expire, an adopting ordinance will be brought back on October 4, 2022. Narrative The following permanent design standards for multifamily buildings in the BD2 zone were recommended by the Architectural Design Board and Planning Board. The recommended draft permanent standards are included as redline/strikeout in Attachment 1 and the interim ordinance valid through October 21, 2022 is Attachment 2. A) Materials The Boards recommended a revision to the interim language regarding alternative materials. Use of preferred materials like natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass remains the first choice. B) Private amenity space The Boards recommended a small change to the distance a balcony could encroach into a required setback from an R-zoned property. A six foot encroachment would provide for ADA compatibility while the 5-foot language in the interim ordinance would not. C) Roof treatment and modulation The Boards recommended revising the interim language to provide a menu of options to achieve roof treatment and modulation. While step downs may be appropriate in some circumstances, other types of roof modulation could reduce broad expanses of flat roof form. The interim language states: "Some roof modulation is required with preference for step downs that follow the slope when slope exists." The recommended language states: "Roof Treatment and Modulation. In order to provide the appearance of a well -modulated roof, three types of roof modulation are required and can include differing heights, projections, Packet Pg. 274 9.1 slopes, materials, step downs, step setbacks, or a similar expression." D) Street -side amenity space or pedestrian area No changes were recommended to the interim language. E) Roof top deck The Boards proposed to add language allowing roof top decks as an additional amenity on top of buildings that are built to the maximum height allowed height of the zone. There was general agreement that roof decks are sought-after amenities for multi -residential projects while standards are proposed to minimize their visual impact. "Roof top deck. A roof top deck may be provided as an additional design feature that extends above the height limit for the zone. Deck railings may extend a maximum of 42 inches above the height limit provided the railing and guard system has the appearance of being transparent, such a glass panel system. All railings must be set back at least 5 feet from the edge of the roof line adjacent to an R-zoned property. No permanent structures are allowed within the roof deck area. " Interim/Permanent Ordinance Histo On February 15, 2022, Council adopted Ordinance 4247, which declared a two -month emergency moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for certain projects in the Downtown Business (BD2) zone. The moratorium applied to projects that require a SEPA threshold determination on sites that are not subject to the Designated Street Front standards in Chapters 16.43 and 22.43 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The moratorium was intended to give staff time to create interim design standards to address gaps in the code that apply to those sites. On March 29, staff introduced the proposed interim design standards to Council. A new section would be added to the existing design standards for the Downtown Business zones in Chapter 22.43 ECDC. These new standards only apply to projects in the BD2 zone that do not have the Designated Street Front requirement and are multifamily -only buildings. The intent of the section was to ensure that this type of project is compatible within the downtown area by adding standards for materials, private amenity space, and street -side amenity space. On April 5, Council held a public hearing on the moratorium and voted to extend the moratorium for two weeks to allow additional time to consider the proposed interim design standards and to gather additional information about the history of the Designated Street Front requirements in the BD zones. Staff also presented the proposed interim design standards and received feedback from Council. The designated street front topic moved along more or less in parallel with the design standard work. On April 19, Council discussed the proposed standards and proposed some amendments of before tabling the discussion due to the late hour. On April 21, the Council discussed the revised interim design standards and approved emergency Ordinance 4256 and revised standards at that meeting. After being extended several times, the building permit moratorium was lifted on June 1 by Council's adoption of Ordinance 4262. On June 14, the Council held a public hearing on the interim ordinance as required by state law (Attachment 3). On June 21, the Council adopted findings supporting the interim standards and to retain them through October 21, 2022. Staff was directed to prepare permanent design standards for the multifamily Packet Pg. 275 9.1 buildings in the BD2 zone and take them through the standard review process for code amendments (Attachment 4). The permanent standards were introduced to the Architectural Design Board on June 29, 2022 and the Planning Board on July 27. The ADB recommended several changes to the interim language for inclusion in the permanent standards on August 8 and the Planning Board held a public hearing the draft permanent standards on August 10. The minutes for those four meetings are included as Attachments 5- 8. Attachment 9 includes the SEPA determination and notice to the Department of Commerce (SEPA was not appealed). Attachments: Attachment 1 - ADB-PB Draft Permanent BD2 Design Standards Attachment 2 - Ordinance 4256 and Interim BD2 Design Standards Attachment 3 - Council minutes 6.14.21 Attachment 4 - Council Findings on Interim BD2 Design Standards Attachment 5 - ADB minutes 6.29.22 Attachment 6 - PB minutes 7.27.22 Attachment 7 - ADB minutes 8.3.22 Attachment 8 - PB minutes 8.10.22 Attachment 9 - SEPA and Commerce Packet Pg. 276 9.1.a EXHIBIT A 22.43.080 Additional Design Standards for Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buildings in the BD2 zone. A. Intent. To ensure that buildings entirely comprised of multiple dwelling ^s;�^t;^I^+ al units are compatible with the downtown area. B. Materials. Building facades must be clad with preferred building materials which include natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Ce RGret^ laminates, veneer fib.,. Gement predu^t,- ;;Rd th.. hki- Alternative materials may be permitted by the Director or Architectural Design Board if they contribute to a cohesive design theme for the building 'c ..lir^te the appeaFaRGe .,F the pFefeFFe,d mat...i^4 C. Private Amenity Space. An exterior area equivalent to at least 10% of the project's gross lot area must be provided as private amenity space for residents of the development. This standard can be met through a combination of balconies (cantilevered, recessed or semi - recessed), decks, patios or yards for individual dwelling units or the site as a whole. 1. Not all dwelling units are required to have private amenity space. When it is provided, it must be immediately accessible from the dwelling unit and be a minimum of 40 sq. ft. 2. If the space is at ground level facing a street, no fence may be over three feet in height. 3. Balconies may encroach into a required setback adjacent to R-zoned property up to a maximum of �6 feet. Patios and decks may encroach into a required setback adjacent commented [cM1]: Change recommended to pr to R-zoned property up to a maximum of 10 feet. ADA compatibility D. Sewe reefmedulation is required with preferenr=e fer step dewns that fellpvV the slepe when slepe exists. Roof Treatment and Modulation. In order to provide the appearance of a well -modulated roof, three types of roof modulation are required and can include differing heights, protections, slopes, materials, step downs, step setbacks, or a similar expression. E. Street -side amenity space or Pedestrian Area. An exterior area equivalent to at least 5% of the project's gross lot area must be provided as street -side amenity space or pedestrian area. This space must be arranged along the street front between the building and the sidewalk and must be open to the sky, unless otherwise excepted. The space must be pedestrian -oriented and may include the following elements: 1. Landscaping 2. Seating area 3. A similar feature as approved by the Director or Architectural Design Board 4. Areas allocated to private amenity space cannot be used toward the street -side amenity space or pedestrian area requirement. F. Roof top deck. A roof top deck may be provided as an additional design feature that extends above the height limit for the zone. Deck railings may extend a maximum of 42 inches above the height limit provided the railing and guard system has the appearance of being transparent, such a glass panel system. All railings must be set back at least 5 feet from the edge of the roof Packet Pg. 277 9.1.a EXHIBIT A line adjacent to an R-zoned property. No permanent structures are allowed within the roof deck area. �L :i N L C C N a Co T C N C m E L a) ♦. L m ♦1 m zi Q Packet Pg. 278 9.1.b ORDINANCE NO. 4256 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots that do not front on a designated street front; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4247 took effect on immediately on February 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium adopted by Ordinance 4247 was scheduled to terminate on April 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended six days by virtue of Ordinance 4253; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was intended to allow planning staff sufficient time to draft interim regulations for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, the six -day extension was afforded to allow planning staff and the city attorney sufficient time to research the history and legislative intent surrounding the BD zones and the designated street front; and WHEREAS, with work continuing on the designated street front, it is proposed that these standards be adopted without lifting the moratorium and that the moratorium be lifted in conjunction with resolution of designated street front issues; and WHEREAS, planning staff have now completed a proposed set of interim design standards for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, planning staff continue to work on a permanent set of multi -family design standards, which could be ready for adoption in the next six -months; and WHEREAS, while the work referenced above continues, the city council desires to adopt the following interim standards to bring the BD2 regulation into closer harmony with the city's values and policy statements; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Interim ❑esign Standards. A new section 22.43.080, entitled "Additional Design Standards Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buildings in the BD2 zone," is hereby added Packet Pg. 279 to the Edmonds Community Development Code to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. Section 2. Duration of -Interim Design Standards. The interim design standards adopted by this ordinance shall commence on the effective date of this ordinance. As long as the city holds a public hearing on this ordinance and adopts findings and conclusions in support of its continued effectiveness (as contemplated by Section 3 herein), this ordinance shall not terminate until six (6) months after the effective date, unless it is repealed sooner. Section 3. Public Hearing on Interim Standards. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing on this interim ordinance within sixty (60) days of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on May 17, 2022 unless the city council, by subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No later than the next regular council meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council shall adopt findings of fact on the subject of this interim ordinance and either justify its continued effectiveness or repeal the interim ordinance. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Declaration of EmeMencv. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the city council, is not subject to referendum. Because it is not subject to referendum, RCW 35A.12.130 applies. Pursuant to RCW 35A.12.130, this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage by a majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the city council. The city council hereby declares that an emergency exists necessitating that this 2 Packet Pg. 280 ordinance take immediate effect. Without taking immediate effect the interim regulations adopted by this ordinance would not take effect prior to the expiration of the moratorium, allowing for the possibility that building permit applications could become vested to the existing regulations, which are not consistent with the city's values and vision for the BD2 zone. Therefore, these interim regulations must be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, and to ensure that any building permit applications submitted would vest to the regulations set forth in this ordinance. This ordinance does not affect any existing vested rights. Section 6. Publication. This ordinance shall be published by an approved summary consisting of the title. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance is not subject to referendum and shall take effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon passage, as set forth herein, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the Council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130. If it is only approved by a majority of the Council, it will take effect five days after passage and publication. APPROVED: MAY MIKE NELS N ATTEST/AUTHENTI TED: &JYXW,SCOtL!�4AEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Packet Pg. 281 9.1.b BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: April 28, 2022 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: April 19, 2022 PUBLISHED: April 21, 2022 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19. 2022 ORDINANCE NO. 4256 4 Packet Pg. 282 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4256 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 191h day of April, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4256. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this I91h day of April, 2022. �y CIT CL I %K, S c,6 SEY Packet Pg. 283 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publieation State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDI1953211 ORMNIANCE 4255, 4256 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of I issuc(s), such publication commencing on 04/25/2022 and ending on 04/25/2022 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount o the fee for su publication is $37.84. Subsefted and sworn air.. day of ;,,,,,me on this Nof!aty Public in and for the State of Washington. Ciq• of Edmonds - LEGALADS 114101416 SCOIT PASSEY + Linda Phillips Notary Public State of Washington MyAppoin.-,ent Expires 8!2912025 Commis„ion Number b417 .may Packet Pg. 284 Classified Proof ORDINANCE SUMMARY gf the Cily0IEdmoods, Washington On the 2151 o[ Aprll, 2022, the City Council of fie City of Edmonds, passed Iha following Oronarmes, The Summaries of said ordinances consisting of titles are provided as fottoWS: ORpINAN� - NO.4255 AN ORDINANCE OF H CITY DMbNDS, WASHINGTON. EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMTT APPLICATIONS FOR BD2 ZONED LOTS THAT 00 NOT FRONT ON A DESIGNATED STREET FRONT AS IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED BY ORDINANCES 4253 AND 4254. ORDINANCE NO.425E AN ORDINANCE OF c�IDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR STAND- ALONE MULTIPLE DWELLING BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM STANDARDS. The full text of these Ordinances will be sent upon roquest. DATED Ihis 21st Day of ApnL 2D22 CITY CLERK. SCOTT PASSEY Published: April 25, 2022. EDH953211 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 04/25/2022 01:18:20 pm Page: 2 Packet Pg. 285 EXHIBIT A 22.43.080 Additional Design Standards Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buildings in the BD2 zone. A. Intent. To ensure that buildings entirely comprised of multiple dwelling residential units are compatible with the downtown area. B. Materials. Building facades must be clad with preferred building materials which include natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber cement products and the like may be permitted by the Director or Architectural Design Board if they replicate the appearance of the preferred materials. C. Private Amenity Space. An exterior area equivalent to at least 10% of the project's gross lot area must be provided as private amenity space for residents of the development. This standard can be met through a combination of balconies (cantilevered, recessed or semi - recessed), decks, patios or yards for individual dwelling units or the site as a whole. 1. Not all dwelling units are required to have private amenity space. When it is provided, it must be immediately accessible from the dwelling unit and be a minimum of 40 sq. ft. 2. If the space is at ground level facing a street, no fence may be over three feet in height. 3. Balconies may encroach into a required setback adjacent to R-zoned property up to a maximum of 5 feet. Patios and decks may encroach into a required setback adjacent to R-zoned property up to a maximum of 10 feet. D. Some roof modulation is required with preference for step-downs that follow the slope when slope exists. E. Street -side amenity space or Pedestrian Area. An exterior area equivalent to at least 5% of the project's gross lot area must be provided as street -side amenity space or pedestrian area. This space must be arranged along the street front between the building and the sidewalk and must be open to the sky, unless otherwise excepted. The space must be pedestrian -oriented and may include the following elements: 1. Landscaping 2. Seating area 3. A similar feature as approved by the Director or Architectural Design Board 4. Areas allocated to private amenity space cannot be used toward the street -side amenity space or pedestrian area requirement. Packet Pg. 286 9.1.c EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APPROVED MINUTES June 14, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Vivian Olson, Mayor Pro Tern Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tern Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Mike Nelson, Mayor 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT Susan McLaughlin, Dev. Serv. Director Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis in the City Council Conference Room and virtually. City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Mayor Nelson. 2. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE CITIZENS' COMMENTS ON INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY -ONLY BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE Senior Planner Mike Clugston thanked the council for scheduling a public hearing tonight. The intent is to have a hearing before the 60 days expires on the interim ordinance for BD2 design standards. The adopting resolution originally scheduled the hearing on May 19, 2022. That date was missed, but by statue the City has 60 days from the date of adoption which was April 21, 2022 so this hearing meets that deadline. The purpose of tonight's public hearing is to gather public input about the proposed standards. Following the hearing, council can determine whether to keep the standards and send them to the planning board and finalize them over the next two months or repeal the standards, knowing some other work has been done in the BD2 zone recently. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis opened the public hearing and described the procedures for in - person public comments. Greg Brewer, Edmonds, commended the council for taking steps to protect the BD2 mixed -use commercial zone. Moving the street frontage line will go a long way toward protecting the small, vulnerable area. The BD2 zone was never intended to be 100% residential and he urge the council to Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 14, 2022 Q Page 1 Packet Pg. 287 9.1.c protect all of it including outside the street frontage line. Design standards are a good tool for great development, the kind of development that blends well with surrounding structures and functions well within the existing infrastructure. However, the standards brought forward by the planning department are not clear or comprehensive. Guidelines need to be spelled out so citizens, developers, planner, building officials and councilmembers are all on the same page. The less subjectivity to the standards the better for all. Four areas of concern need to be addressed: public amenity spaces, building setback and step -backs, modulation, and parking. First, public amenity spaces need clarification; stacking balconies over ground floor public amenity space is like getting credit for the same space twice. Does any part of the amenity space have a percentage of space clear to the sky? Second, setbacks on the ground floor for 100% residential are important which is why all other multifamily zones have ample setbacks except for the mistake project on Edmonds Street & 3rd where there are no setbacks or off-street parking. Buildings should also step back as they rise from the ground floor; even a few feet makes a huge difference. Setbacks and step -backs facilitate pedestrian traffic and allow light and air around these large buildings and both need concrete dimensions associated with them. Third, modulation is key to avoiding a box; any building that has a square roofline the same width and depth as its base should be banned. For lots combined on a slope as on Main & 6t'', modulation of rooftops would make a more attractive appearance and allow for more light and air to adjacent buildings. This is crucial for the health and quality of life for the neighbors. Kathy Brewer, Edmonds, continued Greg Brewer's comments. Furthermore, remember 25 + 5. While the extra 5 feet was granted for modulation and varied roof structure, now there is 30 + 5 for an architectural feature, equipment or elevator structure. This is being used to enable a third floor with a sunken ground floor and results in creeping heights. Taller buildings are being built that overshadow existing buildings, threatening the harmony and small scale of the quaint downtown core. Finally and most importantly, parking will be problematic. Just as 100% residential should mirror the setback standards for multifamily, so should the parking standards. She reference the memorandum from Otak dated May 19, 2022; Mukilteo and Snohomish parking standards require substantially more parking than Edmonds, yet Edmonds is more densely populated than either of those two cities. Edmonds lacks parking and needs to upgrade the number of parking spaces per unit. The 9-unit mistake project on Edmonds Street & 3' has tenant parking fanned out on adjacent streets. Imagine what the two proposed 24-unit apartment buildings on Main Street and Dayton Street would do to the already tight parking. There is a line of vehicles parking well up Main and spilling onto residential side streets daily and into the evening. Where will all the apartment tenants park? Main and Dayton Streets, downtown's main thoroughfares, will be jammed with traffic and parked vehicles. Ms. Brewer continued, this will compound the problem that Dayton residents already have with traffic and pedestrian safety. Getting in and out of downtown with all the traffic and drivers trying to find parking will be a headache and the parking sprawl will be unsightly at the gateway of the historical, charming downtown and should not be allowed. It is imperative that all proposed projects require adequate parking from now on. In conclusion, these design standards are not ready to be passed. There need to be clearly defined public amenity spaces, concrete dimensions for setbacks and step -backs, modulation requirements and an increased number of parking spaces per unit before proceeding. The integrity and charm of the downtown should not be sacrificed for the will of a developer and the ease of the planners. Allowing 100% residential into the tiny BD2 mixed use commercial zone and doing it without clear and comprehensive design standards is a big mistake. Send the planners back to the drawing board to address these issues, not rush this through and ensure what is built is good for the downtown, businesses, citizens and visitors. She referred to an article in My Edmonds News on June 13t'', Meet the New Business, where the owner stated she was thrilled to find a storefront space in downtown Edmonds. Her new business is located on 3' Avenue North in the BD2 zone, evidence that people want and need commercial space in the downtown business district. The BD2 zone needs to be protected and preserved, the demand will only grow as Edmonds grows. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 14, 2022 Q Page 2 Packet Pg. 288 9.1.c Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, said the downtown corridor has been very special to her since opening her business there in 1980. They worked very hard to have commercial on the first floor and residences above. Although she wanted residential above commercial, she was opposed to this 24-unit apartment building with no commercial. She lived in the 4-unit townhouses in that alley for a time; that alley is very dangerous and that amount of traffic will create a serious situation. She thanked the council for holding this public hearing and expressed her interest in retaining the charm in downtown Edmonds. Lynda Fireman, Edmonds, commented this was supposed to be a public meeting in front of the council and there is not even a sign on the locked door and now citizens find themselves in city hall on Zoom. She had intended to thank the city council for asking questions to clarify the zoning of the designated street fronts and design standards and at no time has she seen anything that was unprofessional, discriminatory, harassing, inappropriate or bullying. It is the council's job to probe to find answers before making decisions. It is staffs job to answer those questions and explain their position and reasoning. Communication is key in any office, whether public or private. Most importantly, it is the job of the mayor to be clear what the agenda is because staff follows his lead. This agenda does not seem to be public or council knowledge. She was angry; whenever this development is brought up, there is only 30 minutes for discussion which she found disrespectful. She questioned whether that represented a public forum in Edmonds. She thought a public forum would include questions and answers. She questioned when the public would be given the time they deserved; this is not a project without impacts, it is real life in Edmonds and there is human cost to what is happening. Some of her neighbors may think this won't affect them or they are afraid to speak up; she is not. The general public is only looking at the inappropriate size and design seen from Main Street and likely don't know what is happening. These additional design standards are very small wins when it comes to the big picture. It does not address the impact of those who live on the square block or the other surrounding 15 parcels waiting to be developed. Ms. Fireman continued, it is encroaching and invasive and will cause loss of privacy, views, safety, livability and enjoyment of the neighbors' homes. Except for these three lots, the zoning is residential, RM-1.5. These two lots have a 10-foot drop from Main Street to the alley which means there will be a 4- story flat wall very close to her building. She has asked for pictures like were provided on the front of the building, but still hasn't received them. The fear factor is being used to push the development through. Edmonds is s small town with small town values, not Seattle or Ballard. She recalled comments from people who spoke about moving to Edmonds to get away from the density. The application said structures on adjacent parcels do not support intensity of development under the current zoning and comprehensive plan and are anticipated to eventually be replaced with higher density development. The proposed project is seen as a guide for future redevelopment allowed and encouraged by comprehensive plan. It also said it was market value. She questioned what is being done and what happens now. The one page of additional design standards doesn't say much and can have different interpretations. If this is passed, will the developer and other parcels quickly have applications into the planning department before the zoning and comprehensive plan can be redone? She was very disappointed to say the least in this whole process. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, referred to Chapter 16.43, definitions and requirements of the five distinct BD zones, and section 16.43.030, site development standards section B.8 states, "Within the BD4 zone, there are two options for developing the ground floor of a building. One option is to develop the ground floor with commercial space, meeting the same requirements detailed for the BD2 and BD3 zones in subsection (B)(7) of this section. As a second option, if more residential space is provided so that the ground floor does not meet the commercial use requirements described in subsection (B)(7) of this section, then the building setbacks listed for the RM-1.5 zone shall apply. In the case where RM-1.5 setbacks are required, the required street setback shall be landscaped and no fence or wall in the setback shall be over four feet in height above sidewalk grade unless it is at least 50 percent open, such as in a lattice pattern." She emphasized BD4 has the ground floor exception to be entirely residential, therefore if Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 14, 2022 Q Page 3 Packet Pg. 289 9.1.c the BD2 zone is being interpreted to have the same two options as BD4, the same language should be included as a requirement which will allow BD2 to match the definition as a second option for development of the ground floor as BD4. The Highway 99 subarea plan is fantastic, not mentioned enough and was a very thought-out and thorough process that took years to finalize. Even that plan has a very critical concern noted in the design elements, not allowing a flat, unmodulated wall next to single family or less dense RM-1.5 zone or street. Dr. Dotsch continued, an alley is considered a street as was learned from the streateries and reimagining streets conversations. It states, "The current design critical seek to ensure buildings do not display, bank, unattractive walls to the abutting streets or residential properties, walls or portions of walls abutting streets or visible from residentially zoned properties and suggests a variety of architectural treatments to mitigate impact." It also states, "The comprehensive plan includes recommendations that should be considered when developing uses adjacent to single family areas where intense development adjoins residential areas. Site design including buffers and landscaping and building design should be used to minimize adverse impacts on residentially zoned properties." The recommendation was to establish step - back and setback standards for multifamily buildings adjacent to single family zoning including RM-1.5. She requested those be included in these standards as the Highway 99 subarea plan has great ideas that could be used in the downtown as well. Alleys are streets so a zero lot line, blank, unmodulated wall, just as in the Highway 99 subarea plan should also not be allowed in the downtown BD subarea design standards. There has never been a picture provided of a blank wall on that alley. There is no rush; she requested the council slow down and include photos of what these new design standards will look like. She also requested every adjacent property owner within the usual distance of the BD2 subarea be notified that these setbacks and design standards have been altered and allow them to provide comment in the future. Council Pro Tem Buckshnis described the procedures for virtual public comments. There were no virtual public comments. Council Pro Tem Buckshnis closed the public hearing and remanded the matter to council. Councilmember K. Johnson suggested bringing this back for discussion at a future date. There have been good public comments as well as written comments and the council deserves an opportunity to review them before taking action. City Attorney Jeff Taraday advised the council is required to adopt findings based on the hearing at the meeting following the hearing. The adoption of findings will come to council next week although it could be on the Consent Agenda. As the council's agendas have been very full recently, he was unable to say how much time would be devoted to that item. Mayor Pro Tem Olson asked if staff could provide the information on the item mentioned by Michelle Dotsch regarding the Highway 99 subarea plan regarding walls facing streets by email in the next couple days. Mr. Clugston answered yes. He explained what is being considered tonight is just the interim design standards that the council already adopted. The question is whether to continue those for the next four months while the planning board and city council take another look at the standards or allow the interim standards to expire and have no standards while work is done on the design standards. The interim design standards were developed fairly quickly, but the architectural design board (ADB) and the planning board liked them and the council adopted them. These standards could be retained for now, knowing the process will continue at the planning board and council to make some tweaks if necessary in response to issues that have been raised. The interim standards are valid for six months from adoption so consideration by the planning board and council needs to be completed in the next four months. Mayor Pro Tem Olson commented if council was interested in including the language from the Highway 99 subarea plan, it could not be included as part of the interim design standards; the choice was to Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 14, 2022 Q Page 4 Packet Pg. 290 9.1.c continue with the interim standards or abandon them completely and not have any design standards for multifamily in the BD2 zone. Mr. Clugston answered yes. Councilmember Paine asked if the interim design standards included the analysis done by Kernen Lien regarding the street frontage for the B132 zone. She observed staff was nodding. She asked the status of multifamily design standards, relaying her understanding they had been reviewed by the ADB and should be at the planning board soon. She anticipated the multifamily design standards could help inform this discussion. Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin answered this has been a complex conversation so it is natural there are both active development projects that people are opposed to in addition to the designated street front conversation which was more of a land use conversation regarding permitted uses within the B132 zone as well as the interim design standards. She acknowledged it was confusing, but there are three separate things. The interim design standards are intrinsically linked with the multifamily design standards, however, the multifamily design standards will not get into land uses/permitted uses. Since there is so much interest in this from council, staff has considered whether it is more of a comprehensive plan issue related to the length of the designated street front throughout the downtown and taking a more comprehensive view of the BD zoned properties in conjunction with the vision of the comprehensive plan. The 2022 multifamily design standards are moving forward. Mr. Clugston explained the focus now is on these interim standards. The City has until October to finalize them; it will take time to go through the planning board and council process. Once that is completed, the multifamily design standards will go through the planning board, ADB and council. The interim design standards will inform that larger project, but the interim standards need to be completed first. 3. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 7:31 p.m. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 14, 2022 Q Page 5 Packet Pg. 291 9.1.d RESOLUTION NO. 1494 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO SUPPORT THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 4256, WHICH ADOPTED INTERIM DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THE BD2 ZONE. WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots that do not front on a designated street front; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was originally intended to allow planning staff sufficient time to draft interim design standards for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, planning staff completed a proposed set of interim design standards for the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, the interim design standards only apply to projects in the BD2 zone that do not have the Designated Street Front requirement and are multifamily -only buildings; and WHEREAS, the intent of the interim design standards is to ensure that this type of project is compatible within the downtown area by adding standards for materials, private amenity space, and street -side amenity space; and WHEREAS, the city council adopted the interim design standards with Ordinance 4256 on April 21, 2022; and WHEREAS, the city council held the required public hearing on the interim design standards on June 14, 2022, which was within 60 days as required by RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220; and WHEREAS, planning staff will continue to work on a permanent set of design standards, which will be ready for adoption in October 2022; and WHEREAS, the city council desires to keep in effect the interim design standards adopted by Ordinance 4256 while the work referenced above continues; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS. The city council hereby adopts the above Whereas clauses as its findings of fact to support the adoption of Ordinance 4256. 1 Packet Pg. 292 9.1.d RESOLVED this 21" day of June, 2022. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYO , MIKE NELSON ATTEST: =CdRK,aSCOASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: June 17, 2022 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: June 21, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 1494 2 Packet Pg. 293 9.1.e Board Member Brooks thought that the last unit should not be the only unit to enjoy the landscaping at the end of the building. They already have the benefit of extra windows and natural light that the other units do not have. She liked Board Member Strauss's idea of making it more accessible to all the residents. Board Member Strauss requested that the ADB or staff see the final plans regarding the massing. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER STRAUSS, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER BROOKS, THAT THE ADB ADOPT THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND FINDS THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, POLICIES OF ECDC 20.10, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDS 20.11, AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND APPROVES THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY HOMES WITH THE TEN CONDITIONS AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • ADD ADDITIONAL COLORS AND VARIETY OF MATERIALS TO ADD ADDITIONAL INTEREST AROUND THE BUILDING, PARTICULARLY AT PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. • CONNECT THE WALKWAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH THE NEW SIDEWALK ALONG 210TH AND TO THE SETBACK PORTION OF THE NORTHERN LANDSCAPE AREA. • CONSIDER ADDING SOME KIND OF PEDESTRIAN INTEREST ENTRY FEATURE AT THE WALKWAY AT 210TH TO DRAW A PEDESTRIAN'S EYE TO THE ENTRY IN THE FORM OF AN ARBOR OR OTHER SIMILAR FEATURE. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. The hearing was closed at 8:28 p.m. BOARD REVIEW ITEMS None BOARD DISCUSSION ITEMS Permanent Design Standards for Multifamily Buildings in the BD2 Zone Senior Planner Clugston referred to the set of Interim Design Standards that the Council adopted as part of their work earlier this spring. It is required that permanent standards be adopted by October, and staff is seeking the Board's input. He emphasized that this is only focused on multifamily design standards in the BD2 zone and reviewed the proposed timeline for this work. Designated Street Front Standards: • Commercial and mixed -use buildings • 45-foot depth of ground floor commercial • Floor height minimums • Transparency and access at sidewalk • Detail at ground level • Multifamily allowed behind 45-feet and above Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting June 29, 2022 Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 294 9.1.e Some parcels on the edges of the downtown area but in the BD2 zone do not have Designated Street Front requirements. Since there is no ground floor commercial requirement for those parcels, it is possible that you could have a multifamily -only building. During the Interim Design Standard process Council adopted regulations further extending the Designated Street Front in certain areas. The Interim Design Standards dealt with materials, private amenity space, street -side amenity space, and roof modulation/stepdown. Materials: • Breaks up massing and strengthens identity • Preferred exterior materials: natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick, and glass • Man-made okay if made to look like preferred materials. Private Amenity Space: • Improves livability for smaller residential units • Allows for architectural discretion to design amenity space to align with building character, orientation, and style • Provides additional articulation of massing, adds interest to the facade, and increases 'eyes on the street' The private amenity space has to be 10% of the project area. It can be divided up between balconies, decks, patios, and yards. It can be provided with each individual dwelling unit (if at least 40 so or can be grouped for resident use. Example photos of this were reviewed. Street -side Amenity Space: • Results in a setback to the street to serve as amenity space • Activates street front to improve the pedestrian experience Strengthens pedestrian access and site identity Street -side amenity space is 5% of the lot area. It must be between the building and the sidewalk only and open to the sky. It must include landscaping, seating, art, etc. The street -side amenity space excludes private amenity space area. Canopy/awnings are required and do not impact the amount of street -side amenity space. The intent is to move the building back from the property line and activate that space. Discussion topics: Roof modulations/step downs — The existing language says: "Some roof modulation is required with preference for step downs that follow the slope when slope exists." The intent is to provide variation in roof plane and to reduce bulk. Step downs (or step backs) are useful where tall and short buildings are near each other. They are less useful where adjacent zoning heights are very similar. Are step backs appropriate for buildings of similar heights? Another option is to have roof modulation with similar heights. Board Member Strauss recommended deleting, "follow the slope when slope exists." Board Member Schmitz agreed. He thought that the modulation was important. He cautioned against being overly prescriptive in order to allow creativity by developers. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of virtual Meeting June 29, 2022 Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 295 9.1.e Board Member Brooks said she likes the idea of the variation of rooflines because it provides more interest and allows for more creativity by the developers. She spoke in support of the roof modulation language rather than step backs but thinks that the language should be precise in so they can get the desired outcome. This approach seems to be more appropriate for Edmonds. Board Member Loch commented that the step back is unnecessary with the scale of buildings they are talking out. He suggested that buildings should have visual interest in human scale. He recommended offering the designer a menu of things they can pick from such as modulation, change in materials, varied roofline, awnings, eves, etc. Board Member Herr commented from a builder perspective that the more restrictions they have the more expensive it gets to build. He thinks it will become that no one will build in Edmonds if it gets too restrictive. Board Member Jeude pointed out they are talking only about this particular zone in the city. She thinks that the roof modulation and step back are important to make the transition from downtown to residential. Chair Bayer agreed with Board Member Jeude. She thinks step backs may be important depending on the situation. She is concerned about lack of light and human scale development. Board Member Strauss suggested language such as: "Some roof modulation is required with using variations in slope, variations in overhang projections, setbacks, and step downs." She also recommended requiring a variation from building to building. Private Amenity Space — Rooftop Decks: "A maximum of 50% of the required private amenity space may be provided as a roof top deck. Deck railings may extend a maximum of 42 inches above the height limit provided the railing and guard system has the appearance of being transparent, such as a frameless glass railing system. No permanent structures are allowed within the roof deck area." This was originally in staff s draft to Council. They didn't like having the required private amenity space in the roof top deck area, but he thought they might be open to allowing it after some other amount of private amenity space requirement is met. Chair Bayer thought the Council was mainly concerned about privacy of neighbors and those on the street. Board Member Herr thought that roof top decks provide outdoor space that people aren't getting otherwise. He noted that most of what is being built in Seattle now has rooftop decks. Seattle allows you to use it as outdoor space which provides for more density on the site. Normally the decks don't go all the way to the edge of the building which alleviates some of the privacy concerns. Board Member Schmitz commented that he has designed many buildings, and the rooftop deck is one of the most coveted amenities because it is the largest area you can get in that type of building and allows for enjoying the great views in this region. He commented that many buildings often have patios, but they aren't used as much as rooftop decks because they are smaller and just not as usable. Since height limits aren't changing in the downtown core, it is one of the best and most valuable resources they have. Regarding privacy, he commented that anyone on the street can stand outside your house and look in anytime they want for as long as they want. Finally, he noted that rooftop decks provide accessible space if there are allowances for an elevator core that is a little over height (15 feet typically) to allow for accessible use. He noted that accessibility should also be considered when looking at limiting the sizes of private balconies. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of virtual Meeting June 29, 2022 Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 296 9.1.e Board Member Loch agreed that rooftop decks enhance the livability and often the appearance of structures. He could see not orienting them to face adjacent single-family residences. Board Member Strauss agreed with Board Member Schmitz. She also agreed that it should be accessible. She asked about the elevator core being allowed above the height limit. She also recommended having a minimum size for balconies in order to have usable space. Mr. Clugston noted that the code right now says they must be a minimum of 40 square feet. Board Member Strauss added that she doesn't think builders should be able to take away ground open space and put it on the roof. Board Member Brooks agreed that rooftop decks are a great addition to a living space. She is also in favor of rooftop gardens. One of the great uses of a rooftop garden are that it is a natural coolant for the building. Board Member Jeude agreed that a rooftop deck is a positive thing. From what she recalled of Council's discussion on this, she thought they were concerned about privacy and about people hanging over the deck and yelling at people in the street. She didn't think they were opposed to rooftop decks. They also were concerned that if you could put all that private amenity space on top of the building then you could mass out the building and not provide any other space around it. She likes the option that after a certain percentage of private amenity space is met that a rooftop deck would be allowed. Chair Bayer said she loves rooftop decks. Her concern is height limits and that other green space be provided. She asked if rooftop decks would limit roof modulation. Mr. Clugston did not think it would. Mr. Clugston summarized that the consensus appeared to be that in addition to the 10% of open space, some type of rooftop area could be allowed. Refinements to materials, private or street -side amenity Mr. Clugston asked for any discussion on the list of materials suggested on page 349 of the packet. He noted that the intent is to add interest and to allow flexibility in how builders could achieve these standards. Board Member Strauss liked the list of materials and suggested adding a living wall to the list of options. She also suggested banning LAP siding. Board Member Loch suggested applying these standards to the offending building at 6r' and Main to see if it would help or not. He commented that design standards can't prevent ugly. Board Member Schmitz agreed with Board Member Loch that aesthetics can't be regulated. For example, LAP siding can be very classic in the right situation. Asking for natural materials is kind of irresponsible because they are so expensive and hard to get. A green material or recycled material made of fibers or recycled contents could be a good alternative to the natural materials they are looking for. He noted that there are a lot of different kinds of fiber cements that look very nice. Mr. Clugston noted that concrete laminates, veneers, fiber cement products and the like may be permitted by the director or the Board if they replicate the appearance of the intended materials. Board Member Schmitz did not think that the alternative materials should require approval. He thought there should be more objective standards. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of virtual Meeting June 29, 2022 Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 297 9.1.e Board Member Strauss suggested saying that other materials could be approved by the director or the ADB if they contribute to the appearance of the building. She expressed frustration that even with all their work on the design guidelines they still end up with some ugly buildings. She stressed that they are only talking about this certain zone. She felt they could give ideas of what they are looking for without prescribing the design or the materials. Board Member Loch referred to a case from Issaquah regarding clarity in design review. He stressed that the applicant needs enough information in order to turn in an application that can be approved. He cautioned against being too wishy washy or vague. Chair Bayer agreed and noted they had reviewed the Issaquah case several times, and it is a good reminder. Board Member Schmitz noted that today's ugly building is tomorrow's gem. He cautioned the Board not to become the arbiter of beauty. He said he joined the board to help in that process and to help keep things sane. Chair Bayer stated that her goal is to line standards and designs up with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Clugston indicated he would take the guidance provided tonight and work on some additional draft language for August. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: Mr. Clugston asked the Board to provide feedback at some point on the draft Architectural Design Board Handbook he had sent out a couple months ago. Chair Bayer thanked him for handbook. She thinks it is very helpful. Board Member Brooks stated she hadn't received a copy. ADJOURNMENT: The next meeting will be held on August 3. The meeting was adjourned at 9:46 p.m. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of virtual Meeting June 29, 2022 Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 298 9.1.f together a Stormwater Management Action Plan. In some ways the Salmon -Safe certification will supplement other things; in other ways, it will not. He reviewed other work the City is also doing. Board Member Campbell asked about the impact that focusing on this is having on staff time and other projects. Director Feser replied that some of these items would not have been on the work plan. By committing to the certification, they have to put off other things. Board Member Campbell asked what those things are. Director Feser indicated she would need to follow up on that. This is part of why they want to go to Council to make sure Council understands the price tag and the time commitment required. Ultimately, this will be the Council's decision. Mr. De Lilla concurred. The preference would be to get additional staffing and funds so they can continue to deal with all the other issues. Board Member Gladstone commented that the tradeoff issue is an important one that the Council should consider seriously given the demands on the budget. She thinks it would also be important for Council to consider what those milestones will be. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG, THAT THE PLANNING BOARD ADVANCE THIS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION, UNDERSCORING THE IMPORTANCE OF LOOKING AT THE FINANCIAL TRADEOFFS OF IMPLEMENTING THIS VERSUS THE IMPACTS ON THE REST OF THE BUDGET AND ENSURING THAT THERE ARE GOOD MILESTONES OR BENCHMARKS FOR MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS VALUE IN THE WORK THAT IS BEING DONE. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. NEW BUSINESS A. Permanent Design Standards for Multifamily Buildings in the BD2 Zone Senior Planner Clugston reviewed a PowerPoint presentation regarding Permanent Design Standards for multifamily -only buildings in the BD2 zone. Council adopted interim design standards a couple months ago. Staff is in the process of developing permanent design standards for these same buildings. He reviewed the timeline for the adoption process and the moratorium process. These standards are intended to apply to the areas in the BD2 zone that do not have the Designated Street Front requirements. Council also adopted an interim map during the design standard discussion which changed the Street Front map. As a result, only a handful of non -Designated Street Front parcels remain in the BD2 zone at the edges of the downtown area. The interim design standards targeted these particular sites and addressed materials, private amenity space, street -side amenity space, and roof modulation/stepdown regulations. Materials: • Breaks up massing; strengthens identity • Preferred exterior materials: natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick, and glass • Man-made is acceptable if made to look like preferred materials Private Amenity Space: • Intended to improve livability for smaller residential units • Allows for architectural discretion to design amenity space to align with building character, orientation, and style • Provides additional articulation of massing, adds interest to the fagade, and increases `eyes on the street' Planning Board Meeting Minutes July 27, 2022 Page 7 of 9 Packet Pg. 299 9.1.f • Standards: 0 10% of project area o can be made by balconies, decks, patios, yards o can be grouped together with a dwelling unit or grouped for resident use o if with individual units must be greater than 40 square feet o balconies can project 5' into setback from R-zone property o decks and patios can project up to 10' in the setback area Street -side Amenit Space: • Results in a setback from the sidewalk to serve as amenity space • Activates street front to improve the pedestrian experience • Strengthens pedestrian access and site identity • Standards: o Must be 5% of lot area o Must be between the building front and sidewalk only and open to sky o Must include landscaping, seating, art, etc. o Street -side amenity space area excludes any private amenity space area that is provided at the front of the building o Canopy/awnings are required and do not impact the amount of street -side amenity area. Roof Modulation/Stepdown: The language added to the interim standards stated that "some roof modulation is required with preference for stepdowns that follow the slope when slope exists." The intent was to provide a variation in roof plane and reduced the bulk of the building. The Architectural Design Board asked staff to pick up more on the roof modulation aspect and provide a menu of options that a developer could use to meet the additional roof modulation requirements. Staff will be working on this for next week. Private Amenity Space — Rooftop Deck: There was some concern that if the required private amenity space was allowed on the rooftop, it might all go there. The Architectural Design Board wanted the rooftop option to be available after the 10% of private amenity space is achieved for individual units. They also would allow that to be above the height limit with certain conditions. Mr. Clugston stated that staff would be going back to the ADB next week to further refine the language for permanent standards and then be back before the Planning Board in two weeks for a public hearing on those standards. Comments/Questions: None PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Mr. Lien reviewed the extended agenda and solicited feedback on the length of the agenda/meeting tonight. Chair Crank stated she did not like late meetings. She thinks the length of agenda tonight was good, but the members need to self -monitor the amount of questions and comments. She reminded board members that staff welcomes questions between meetings also. Board Member Gladstone thought there was too much on the agenda tonight. It's not necessarily the number of items on the list, but how long each one takes. She appreciates Chair Crank's comments about being judicious Planning Board Meeting Minutes July 27, 2022 Page 8 of 9 Packet Pg. 300 9.1.g CITY OF EDMONDS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Minutes of Webinar Meeting August 3, 2022 Chair Bayer called the meeting of the Architectural Design Board to order at 7:01 p.m. via Zoom. Board Members Present Kim Bayer, Chair Joe Herr Maurine Jeude Corbitt Loch Steve Schmitz Board Members Absent Lauri Strauss (excused) Alexa Brooks, Vice Chair (absent) APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 29, 2022 ADB Meeting Minutes Staff Present Mike Clugston, Senior Planner MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER LOCH, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER SCHMITZ, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None PUBLIC HEARINGS None BOARD REVIEW ITEMS Recommendation on Permanent Design Standards for Multifamily Buildings in the BD2 Zone (AMD2022- 0001) Architectural Design Board Meeting Q Minutes of Virtual Meeting August 3,2022 Pagel of4 Packet Pg. 301 9.1.g Senior Planner Mike Clugston introduced a presentation regarding Permanent Design Standards for BD2 properties that do not have Designated Street Front requirements. Mr. Clugston reviewed changes made by staff in response to comments from the last meeting. Questions and comments were taken throughout the presentation. Board Member Loch asked why they were only discussing this only for the standalone multifamily buildings and not including mixed use and commercial buildings. Mr. Clugston explained how this came about with an application this year when they realized there was a hole in this zone related to parcels with no Designated Street Front requirements. He reviewed the moratorium enacted by Council in February which gave time to develop an interim ordinance. Now they are taking the interim standards and developing permanent standards for these parcels. Mr. Clugston explained that commercial and multiuse buildings would presumably have first floor heights that would match or be very similar to first floor heights that the code calls for where the street front standard does exist. Chair Bayer thought there should be clarification about what "compatible" means in the Intent section. Mr. Clugston explained this was a general statement to make sure the intent is to make sure the building fits in to the downtown area. Board Member Schmitz commented that downtown has an eclectic mix of buildings and not one particular style. He suggested what they really want is for it to look nice with higher end materials. He said he liked the language the way it is. Private Amenity Space: • Board Member Schmitz commented that the 10% gross lot number seems in line with what he has seen in a lot of other jurisdictions. • Chair Bayer expressed concern about the lack of privacy with a three-foot fence and asked if this is standard. Mr. Clugston explained that the intent is to have the building interact with the sidewalk. He acknowledged that units on the street level would have less privacy than those in other areas. Tenants would be aware of this going into the situation. • Board Member Schmitz asked about allowing clear or translucent balcony -like features to enhance privacy of ground -level private amenity space. Mr. Clugston referred to the post office building and three units that exit right to the sidewalk as an example of what they are looking for. The idea was that they could put a small fence there, but not a solid barrier to screen off the building. • Board Member Loch asked about any flexibility available in these standards. Mr. Clugston replied that the design standards have very little flexibility built in. It would take a separate code amendment to provide the director or the Board to allow some flexibility in certain, specific design standards. He agreed that this would be desirable. • Board Member Loch referred to Private Amenity Space, item 3, and suggested it might be better to state how far away from the property line patios and decks could be rather than stating how far into the setback they could go. Mr. Clugston explained that the building must be set back a certain amount, but there are elements that can project into that space. • Board Member Schmitz commented that from an accessibility perspective, a five-foot turning radius is the minimum for a wheelchair. A five-foot balcony would not allow for this by the time railings are considered. He suggested allowing balconies to encroach six feet, instead of five feet, into the setback to allow for this kind of accessibility. He noted that the Washington State Building Code requires a certain number of units be ADA accessible and be provided with amenities that are accessible generally. There was consensus to change this amount to six feet. Architectural Design Board Meeting Q Minutes of Virtual Meeting August 3,2022 Page 2 of Packet Pg. 302 9.1.g Roof Modulation: • Chair Bayer asked how the roof modulation requirement would impact the ability to have rooftop decks. Mr. Clugston replied that the entire roof wouldn't have to be modulated. • Board Member Schmitz agreed that they don't want to have a single expression on a roof. He commented that sometimes the edge of the roof is different than the rest of the roof. Requiring a slope could complicate things for the builder who must keep the building within a certain height. He suggested adding language to clarify that this refers to just the frontage or fagade and not necessarily the roof itself. • Board Member Herr expressed concern about having a false front that looks like a "cowboy town". • Chair Bayer and Board Member Jeude asked about verbiage related to requiring "horizontal" modulation to break up the boxy look of a building. Mr. Clugston replied that the private amenity space and roof modulation requirements are attempts to address this. There are other places in the code that address modulation such as the Comprehensive Plan and design standards in use for the downtown area. • Chair Bayer said her biggest concern is trying to avoid a big flat box with just balconies and/or patios in this zone. She doesn't understand how this language avoids that. Mr. Clugston thought this language would give builders options of ways to not make a flat roof since they must choose three of the options. Portions of it can be flat, but other portions must use various methods. He envisions multiple ways to achieve the objective she raised. • Board Member Jeude also was concerned that the amenity space requirement and the roof modulation language would not prevent the box issue. Mr. Clugston agreed and noted that the existing Comprehensive Plan and design guidelines address and require modulation of walls. He reviewed how the development feedback process generally works. • Board Member Loch agreed with Board Member Schmitz that they are referring to the part of the building that they can see. He wasn't sure if requiring that developers use three of the options was the way they should go. He suggested that the intent statements and policy goals be included here for clarity. • There was some discussion about the intent for these small pockets of buildings to make a smooth transition between residential and downtown commercial. • Board Member Schmitz suggested calling it parapet modulation or roof treatment modulation instead of rooftop modulation. To him, rooftop modulation implies the whole roof instead of just the part you can see. There was discussion about revised verbiage for this section to include: "In order to avoid the appearance of a well -modulated roof, three types of roof modulation are required..." Street -side Amenity Space or Pedestrian Area: cm • Board Member Schmitz asked about allowing a rain cover or trellis instead of "open to sky". Mr. o Clugston explained the intent behind the "open to sky" requirement. r c Roof Top Deck: E • Board Member Loch asked where the 10-foot setback from the roof edge came from. Mr. Clugston o explained there had been some concern at a previous meeting about having a railing at roof edge which Q is why the change was made. However, per building code, it can go right up to the roof edge. ti r • Chair Bayer commented that since this BD2 zone is transitional and right next to multifamily or single- family residential, having the deck go all the way to the edge of the roof could be problematic. • Mr. Clugston proposed that it could be a 10-foot setback on a roof edge adjacent to a residential zoned property. In other cases, it wouldn't have to be set back. Q • Board Member Jeude noted that the City Council was very concerned about people hanging over the edge. She agreed that ten feet was a lot. Five feet might be sufficient. E Architectural Design Board Meeting Q Minutes of Virtual Meeting August 3,2022 Page 3 of Packet Pg. 303 9.1.g Board Member Schmitz commented that the roof is already set back a certain distance from the property line and balconies can already project into that space. He is not sure that being on top of a building behind a railing would be more problematic. He spoke in support of getting rid of the setback requirement on the roof Chair Bayer was supportive of leaving the language as it was written. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER LOCH, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER SCHMITZ, TO AMEND THE LAST SENTENCE OF ITEM F REGARDING ROOF TOP DECKS TO READ: "ALL RAILINGS MUST BE SET BACK AT LEAST 5 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF A ROOF LINE ADJACENT TO AN R-ZONED PROPERTY." Board Member Schmitz commented that there are already roof decks allowed to the edge of some buildings. He stated he was open to compromising on a lesser setback amount if necessary. THE MOTION TO AMEND PASSED. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER JEUDE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER LOCH, TO FORWARD THE LANGUAGE AS REVISED TO THE PLANNING BOARD. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. BOARD DISCUSSION ITEMS There as discussion about pros and cons of meeting in person versus remotely. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: None ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:19 p.m. N N M 00 N N r 7 C E m a Architectural Design Board Meeting Q Minutes of Virtual Meeting August 3,2022 Page 4 of Packet Pg. 304 9.1.h difference between making the interim designation permanent and the Recommendation 5 regarding allowing mixed use. Mr. Lien explained Recommendation 5 would also address potential height issues. • EDC Commissioner Smith commented that the Comprehensive Plan update is the appropriate time to take a deeper look at this. He cautioned against getting rid of potential commercial space as they are seeing vibrant growth in the city. He voiced support for Recommendation 4. • PB Member Kuehn expressed concern that if they only do Recommendation 3 it allows issues to happen in other areas. He agrees with "protecting the dirt" until they can take a broader look at this. He spoke in support of Recommendation 4. • PB Member Campbell spoke in support of trying to raise the building height limits in order to get to three stories. She thinks it is going to be necessary in the long run to have this commercial space. She spoke in support of Recommendations 4 or 5 to keep commercial space from disappearing. • EDC Commissioner Hoag commented that this will all lead to some reevaluation of the Comprehensive Plan. It doesn't seem feasible that the current owners of the building could adjust their current building to match the interim standards and get it approved before they get to the Comprehensive Plan update. He wasn't sure if anything would ever occur if they did Recommendation 3. MOTION MADE BY PB MEMBER ROSEN TO SUPPORT OF RECOMMENDATION 4 TO "PROTECT THE DIRT" AND TAKE A BROADER LOOK AT THIS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS. MOTION SECONDED BY PB MEMBER GLADSTONE. • Student Representative Distelhorst spoke to the need for more housing and spoke in support of preserving options for multifamily housing. • EDC Commissioner Haug asked if EDC members should participate in voting tonight. Mr. Lien noted that the formal recommendation by the Planning Board would be taken following the September 28 public hearing. He stated that they would like to hear the recommendation from the EDC. • EDC Commissioner Hamilton agreed that the City does need some housing in the downtown area, especially charming housing. He thinks that this will help the existing businesses. He also recommended making sure to change height requirements so that they can get three floors. He recommended Recommendation 3 which gives the most flexibility and uses the Comprehensive Plan process. • PB Member Kuehn clarified that the motion would extend the B132 zones and take a broader look at all BD zones after the Comprehensive Plan process. It will not take away the ability to build residential units. THE MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDED OPTION 4 PASSED. Mr. Lien stated that staff would bring back Recommendation 4 to the public hearing on September 28. Chair Crank thanked the EDC for joining them tonight. EDC Chair Hughes thanked the group for the collaboration. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Hearing on Permanent Design Standards for Multifamily Buildings in the BD2 Zone (AMD2022- 0001) Senior Planner Mike Clugston introduced the public hearing for the permanent standards for multifamily only buildings in the BD2 zone as recommended by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) last week. He reviewed Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 305 9.1.h the amended language from the ADB. He noted that if the recommendation tonight is eventually passed by the Council these standards would be moot. • Materials — The intent was to use preferred building materials such as stone, wood, metal, brick, and glass. The ADB wanted to allow alternative materials if they are contributing to a cohesive design theme for the building. • Private AmenitySpace — The ADB suggested allowing balconies to encroach into an R-zoned property up to 6 feet rather than 5 feet to make the balconies ADA compatible. • Roof Treatment and Modulation — New verbiage provides a menu of options for developers to use. They have to use at least three of them. • Roof Top Deck — The ADB liked the roof top deck concept in addition to the private amenity space. Vice Chair Pence asked if the stairwell penthouse structure would be allowed on the roof deck area. Mr. Clugston replied that it would not be allowed, but an elevator penthouse would be allowed. Vice Chair Pence did not think that made sense and that it would make the building more expensive than needed. Board Member Campbell agreed that a stairwell penthouse should also be allowed. Mr. Clugston replied that could be looked at as they go through the process and look at definitions of height. Public Testimony: Michelle Dutch referred to building massing, step backs, and shadows. She suggested that a step back for the top floor could be an option for a rooftop amenity so it is not massing and towering over the pedestrian area. She stated that horizontal modulation is critical for interest in the building. She commented that the Subarea Highway 99 Plan has a critical design concern related to not allowing a flat unmodulated wall next to single family or less dense RM 1.5 zone, street, or alley. She also expressed concern about the lack of requirements for green space. Will Magnuson spoke in support of the Board's vote tonight on the BD2 zone. He also spoke in support of the 15-foot height requirement for first floor commercial because it allows for flexibility in uses by providing space for ducting and HVAC options. Regarding roof top decks, he thinks that the stairwell should be an option also and should be adjacent the elevator. He appreciates the roof variance design intent but noted he has seen some really interesting buildings with flat roofs and some really horrible buildings with pitched roofs. Board Discussion: Board Member Campbell asked about green space requirements. Mr. Clugston reviewed requirements for open space, noting that there is not a specific green space requirement in the downtown area. Residential areas have setbacks which are typically green areas. Where multifamily buildings are adjacent to R-zones, landscape buffer plantings would be required. Chair Crank encouraged consideration of pocket parks. She agreed that stairwells should be an option for roof top decks. Board Member Campbell suggested having some sort of green requirement to allow surfaces to allow water absorption. She referred to the Salmon Safe certification and how this could tie in. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 306 9.1.h Board Member Rosen asked if there is anything about this staff is concerned about. Mr. Clugston thought that this is a good effort at providing additional guidance for these particular projects. He acknowledged that if the designated street front line is redrawn, these design standards become moot. For now, they are a good addition. Board Member Kuehn suggested encouraging developers to consider incorporating green space wherever possible. MOTION MADE BY CHAIR CRANK, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, TO FORWARD THIS TO COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL. Board Member Campbell stated that this is going in a good direction, but she would like to see inclusion of green space and green building requirements. MOTION PASSED. The public hearing was closed at 9:06 p.m. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Staff reviewed the extended agenda. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Rosen thanked everyone who participated tonight. He also appreciated the nature of the discussion. He especially thanked Student Representative Distelhorst for her participation. Vice Chair Pence suggested they need to be paying attention to the community conversations related to the visioning stage of the Comprehensive Plan process. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Crank thanked everyone for their participation. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:19 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 307 or EDA, o� -f c CITY OF EDMONDSIF 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 p DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Amendment to Chapter 22.43 of the Edmonds Community Development Code adding Section 22.43.080, Additional Design Standards for Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buildings in the BD2 Zone. Proponent: City of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address if any: This is a non -project action. Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The City of Edmonds has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. X This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by September 6, 2022. Project Planner: Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Responsible Official: Kernen Lien, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220 Date: August 22, 2022 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Kernen Lien, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than September 13, 2022. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Kernen Lien to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on August 22, 2022, at City Hall and the Edmonds Public Safety Building. Not posted at Edmonds Public Library since it's currently closed. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@ecy.wa.gov). XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and associated documents can be obtained online at https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under permit number AMD2022-0001, by emailing the project planner(michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov), or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Page 1 of 2 AMD2022-0001 SEPA DETERMINATION BD2 ME ONLY DESIGN STANDARDS CODE AMENDMENT 8i17/22.SEPn Packet Pg. 308 9.1.i Distribution List: This DNS and SEPA checklist were distributed to the following: ❑ Applicant ❑ Parties of Record ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish and Wildlife ❑X Puget Sound Energy ❑X Snohomish PUD ❑ Olympic View Water & Sewer ❑ Alderwood Water District ❑X Edmonds School District ❑ Port of Edmonds ❑X South County Fire ❑ Swedish Hospital ❑X Community Transit pc: File No. SEPA Notebook ❑X Dept. of Ecology ❑ Dept. of Ecology - Shorelands ❑ Dept. of Natural Resources ❑N Dept. of Commerce ❑ WSDOT ❑ WSDOT— Ferries ❑ Dept. of Fish & Wildlife ❑ Dept. of Health — Drinking Water ❑N Dept. of Arch. & Historic Pres. ❑ Dept. of Parks and Rec. Commission ❑ Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ❑ Puget Sound Regional Council ❑ Puget Sound Partnership ❑X Tulalip Tribe ❑ City of Everett ❑ City of Lynnwood ❑ City of Mountlake Terrace ❑ City of Mukilteo ❑ City of Shoreline ❑ Town of Woodway ❑ Snohomish Co. Public Works ❑ Snohomish Co. PDS ❑ Snohomish Co. Health Dist. ❑ King County -Transit ❑ King County— Environ. Planning ❑ Other Page 2 of 2 AMD2022-0001 SEPA DETERMINATION BD2 ME ONLY DESIGN STANDARDS CODE AMENDMENT 8i17/22.SEPn Packet Pg. 309 9.1.i File No.: AMD2022-0001 Applicant: City of Edmonds DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 22th day of August, 2022, the attached SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance was posted as prescribed by Ordinance. However, it was not posted at the Edmonds Public Library because it is currently closed due to a water leak that occurred on June 24. I, Mike Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 22nd day of August, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: Packet Pg. 310 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly swom, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH961280 AMD22022-0001 SEPA as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 08/22/2022 and ending on 08/22/2022 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount the fee for s h publication is $44.72. Subscribed an sworn b me on this ~ day of , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmond' Development Savim 186031703 MICBME MARTIN Ambn)-Z-m ( geFn-- 7AP�Pai a Phi-- Ilip��` ry Public Wshington f:apiras 8/29/2025 ,onPlumber 4417 9.1.i Packet Pg. 311 9.1.i k,,,assified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF SEPA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance for the following project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment to Chapter 22.43 of the Edmonds CommunPty Development Code adding Section 22,43.080, Additional Design Standards for Stand -Alone Multiple Dwelling Buttdfngs in the BD2 Zone. PROJECT PROPONENT: City of Edmonds DATE DNS ISSUED: August22,2022 PROJECT LOCATION: This is a non -project action, SEPA COMMENTS DUE: September 6, 2022 APPEAL PERIOD: You may appeal this determination by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required appeal fee no later than September 13, 2022 by 4100 PM. SEPA MATERIALS: The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and related project information are available for review at; https-//www.edmondswa.gov/services/public_involvemenUpubec notices/development—notices under permit number AMD2022- 5001, by ematHng the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugslon, AICP, Senior Planner n)ichael.cluston@ediiiondswa.gov 425-771-02 -0 Published: August 22, 2022. EDH961280 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 08/22/2022 09:23:09 am Page: 2 Packet Pg. 312 9.1.i From: COM GMU Review Team <reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:35 AM To: Clugston, Michael Subject: City of Edmonds - Expedited Review Request Granted for Submittal ID: 2022- E-4245 Dear Mr. Clugston, Your request for an Expedited Review has been granted for: Proposed amendment to create additional design standards for multifamily -only buildings in the City's Downtown Mixed Commercial (BD2) zone that are not subject to the designated street front requirements in Chapter 16.43 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The regulations are provided in a new section, ECDC 22.43.080. As of receipt of this email, you have met the Growth Management notice to state agency requirements in RCW 36.70A.106 for this submittal. Please keep this email as confirmation. If you have any questions, please contact Kirsten Larsen at (360) 280-0320 or by email at kirsten.larsen@commerce.wa.gov. --- ONLINE TRACKING SYSTEM AVAILABLE ---- Log into our new PlanView system at https://secureaccess.wa.gov/com/planview where you can keep up with this submittal status, reprint communications and update your contact information. Don't have a user account? Reply to this email to request one and attach a completed PlanView User Request Form. Have questions about using PlanView? Use the PlanView User Manual for assistance at https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving-communities/growth- management/washington-department-of-commerce-growth-management-submitting- materials/. Sincerely, Review Team Growth Management Services Packet Pg. 313 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Public Hearing for Street Vacation PLN2022-0045 Staff Lead: Michele Szafran Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michele Szafran Background/History Kent Scudder has submitted a petition to vacate an unopened alley right-of-way located south of Fir St., adjacent to the properties addressed 838 Fir St. and 1108 9th Ave. S. The city council is required to consider street vacations in a public hearing set by resolution. The City Council passed Resolution No. 1501 setting the public hearing for September 20, 2022. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that city council adopt the resolution of intent to vacate the portion of unopened alley right-of-way south of Fir Street, adjacent to the properties addressed 838 Fir St. and 1108 9th Ave. S. as shown on Exhibits A and B of the resolution on condition that the petition pay for one-half the appraised value of the vacation property. Narrative The unopened alley that is subject to this application is located south of Fir St. and adjacent to the properties addressed 838 Fir St. and 1108 9th Ave. S. The alley right-of-way is approximately 17 feet wide and approximately 119 feet long. The City of Edmonds does not have utilities located within the right-of-way. All property owners adjacent to this alley have signed the petition for street vacation. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.070, the City Council is to consider the vacation request at a public hearing set by resolution. The City Council passed Resolution No. 1501 setting the public hearing for September 20, 2022. Procedures and criteria for street vacations are detailed in Chapter 20.70 Edmonds Community Development Code. The attached staff report and attachments includes a detailed analysis of the requested street vacation and provides a recommendation to the City Council. Attachments: PLN2022-0045 Staff Report & Attachments Resolution of Intent to Vacate Packet Pg. 314 9.2.a '11c. 18yV Project: CITY OF EDMONDS 12151h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Consideration of vacating that portion of unopened Alley adjacent to the properties addressed at 838 Fir Street and 1108 91h Ave. South. Requested Permits: PLN2022-0045 Date of Report: September 15, 2022 Staff Contacts: Michele Q. Szafran, Associate Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Public Hearing: September 20, 2022 Council Chambers 250 - 5th Avenue North, Edmonds Citizens may connect using a computer or smart phone at: https:Hzoom.us/j/95798484261 or join the meeting by phone at: US: +1 253 215 8782. I. II. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND PROCESS An application and petition have been filed by Kent Scudder to vacate that portion of unopened right-of-way lying south of Fir St. between 838 Fir St. and 1108 91h Ave. S. running south for approximately 120 feet to the northern boundary of 1125 Sea Vista PL. (Attachments 1-2 and 4-6). This stretch of right-of-way is 17 feet wide and approximately 120 feet in length, for a total area of approximately 2,038 square feet (Attachments 4-6). The properties adjacent to the proposed street vacation area are privately owned. The City Council is required to consider street vacations in a public hearing set by resolution. The Council passed Resolution No. 1501 (Attachment 8) which set the public hearing for September 20, 2022. Following is staff s evaluation of the street vacation criteria as established in Chapter 20.70 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Location: The subject street vacation is for that portion of unopened right-of-way lying directly south of Fir St. and east of 838 Fir St. and west of 1108 9th Ave. S. This section PLN20170052 — Gunn Street Vacation Page 1 of 9 Packet Pg. 315 9.2.a of unopened right-of-way is surrounded by existing single-family residential developments. Refer to Attachments 3 & 11 for a vicinity map. 2. Zoning: Public rights -of -way are unzoned. All surrounding properties are located within the RS-10 zone (Single -Family Residential; 10,000 square feet minimum lot size). See Attachment 11 for a zoning and vicinity map. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the immediately adjacent properties is "Single Family - Urban 3". Given the surrounding Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations, if the City Council approves the proposed street vacation, the vacated right-of-way should be zoned RS-10 with a Comprehensive Plan designation of "Single Family - Urban 3." This would be consistent with the existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations of the abutting land to the east and west of the subject right-of-way that it would be dedicated to. 3. Size: The area of the proposed vacation is approximately 2,038 square feet. 4. Existing Use: This portion of right-of-way is currently unopened and unimproved. There is sod and some vegetation throughout and is relatively unused except for possibly being used on an informal basis by the adjacent property owner for an extended yard space. III. NOTICE Public Notice requirements for street vacations are detailed in ECDC 20.70.090. A notice for the council's consideration of vacation was published in the Herald Newspaper on August 31, 2022. A notice was also posted in three locations at the subject site and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. In accordance with ECDC 20.70.090, the public notice stated that no easements will be retained during the vacation process for no utilities currently exist within the right-of-way (Attachment 9). The City has complied with the noticing provisions of ECDC 20.70.090. IV. PUBLIC CONCERNS As of the writing of this staff report, the City has received one written comment regarding the proposed street vacation. Mr. Ken Reidy submitted a written response via email on July 31, 2022. The email in summary raises questions regarding ownership as a whole or one- half to each abutting property owner and questioned the need to pay for an appraisal prior to knowing if one would be necessary (Attachment 10). The following is provided in response to these comments. The final decision section of this report describes the original plat dedication and future ownership of the subject right-of- way. Should it be approved for vacation, one-half of the right-of-way would be deeded to each of the property owners abutting the west and east sides of the vacation area. The submission of an appraisal at the time of application is a code requirement as provided in Edmonds Community Development Code 20.70.060. PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 2 of 9 Packet Pg. 316 9.2.a V. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE This application was reviewed and evaluated by South County Fire and City of Edmonds Public Works Operations & Maintenance and Engineering Divisions. Additionally, PSE, SNOPUD, Comcast and Ziply were consulted regarding the proposal. South County Fire: South County Fire District did not have any concerns on the subject proposal. City of Edmonds Engineering and Maintenance & Operations Divisions of Public Works: There are no existing City utilities located within the subject right-of-way and there are no future plans to locate utilities within the subject right-of-way. This area does not need to be reserved for public use and no easements to the City are required (Attachment 12). PSE, SNOPUD, Comcast and Ziply: Verification has been provided from PSE, PUD, Comcast and Ziply stating that there are no utilities or easements within the subject right-of-way. The area does not need to be reserved for public use and no easements are required (Attachment 7). VI. ECDC 20.70 — STREET VACATIONS A. ECDC 20.70.050 Initiation of Proceedings Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.050.B, a vacation may be initiated by petition of the owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of the street or alley to be vacated. The portion of right-of-way proposed for vacation directly abuts the properties addressed 838 Fir St. and 1108 9th Ave. S. The southern portion of right-of-way is bordered by the developed single-family lot located at 1125 Sea Vista Pl. A petition for vacation (Attachment 2) was submitted with signatures from the following adjacent property owners (shown by a red dot on the map below): Kent Scudder who owns the property addressed 838 Fir St.; Sandra Schenkar who owns the property addressed 1108 9th Ave. S.; and Chris and Deirdre Miller who owns the property addressed 1125 Sea Vista PL. PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 3 of 9 Packet Pg. 317 9.2.a iLl all 1133 1150 Area to be +� vacated • w } • 1108 0 a 1125 1141 With signatures from the owners of more than two-thirds of the property abutting the portion of the right-of-way to be vacated, the initiation of vacation proceedings is compliant with ECDC 20.70.050. B. ECDC 20.70.020 Criteria for Vacation The City Council may vacate a street, alley or easement only if it finds that: 1. The vacation is in public interest; and The section of unimproved right-of-way that is subject to this proposal currently serves as additional yard area to those property owners on the west and east sides of the area to be vacated. All properties abutting this section of right-of-way take access from either Fir Street or Sea Vista Place. The property to the east of the unimproved right-of-way also has access off 9th Ave. S. The City of Edmonds has no existing or planned future transportation use for the right-of-way and it is not otherwise used by the public. In addition, there are no existing utilities or plans to locate utilities within this portion of right-of-way in the future. The proposed vacation area would remove the City from any maintenance concerns and/or liability from potential issues with any existing or future vegetation within the area of the proposed vacation. As noted, the right-of-way currently serves as additional yard area to the adjacent property owners and given it serves no public purpose, returning the property to the tax rolls would be in the interest of the public. 2. No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation. PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 4 of 9 Packet Pg. 318 9.2.a No properties use the subject portion of right-of-way for direct property access. This right-of-way is currently unopened and unimproved. Adjoining properties will continue to have direct access from Fir St, 91h Ave. S. and Sea Vista Pl. No properties would be denied direct access as a result of the vacation. C. ECDC 20.70.040 Limitations on Vacations 1. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.040.A, "The city may not vacate any street, alley, easement, or part thereof that abuts any body of water unless all elements of RCW 35.79.035 are complied with, and the vacated area will thereby become available for the city or other public entity to acquire and to use for a public purpose." The proposed vacation area does not abut any bodies of water. 2. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.040.B, "The city shall not proceed with the vacation if the owners of 50 percent or more of the property abutting the street or alley or part thereof, or underlying the easement or part thereof, to be vacated file a written objection in the planning division prior to the time of the hearing." As of the writing of this staff report, the City has not received any written objections from owners of property abutting the subject right-of-way. As discussed above in section IV, as of the writing of this staff report, the City has received one written comment regarding the proposal from Mr. Ken Reidy, who does not have property directly abutting the subject portion of right-of-way. D. ECDC 20.70.140 Final Decision 1. ECDC 20.70.140.A provides the following: Following the public hearing, the city council shall, by motion approved by a majority of the entire membership in a roll call vote, either: 1. Adopt an ordinance granting the vacation; or 2. Adopt a motion denying the vacation; or 3. Adopt a resolution of intent to vacate stating that the city council will, by ordinance, grant the vacation if the owner(s) of property abutting upon the street or alley, or part thereof so vacated, meet specific conditions within 90 days. The city may require the following as conditions: a. Either: i. Monetary compensation to be paid to the city in the amount of up to one-half the fair market value for the street, alley, or part thereof to PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 5 of 9 Packet Pg. 319 be vacated unless acquired at 'Public expense, " then full appraised value shall be paid; or ii. The grant of a substitute public right-of-way which has value as an access way at least equal to the vacated street, alley, or part thereof; or iii. Any combination ofsubsections (A)(3)(a)(i) and (A)(3)(a)(ii) of this section totaling but not more than one-half the fair market value of the street, alley, or part thereof to be vacated. b. A grant of an easement to the city in exchange for the easement vacated. If the abutting property owner(s) complies with conditions imposed in the resolution of intent to vacate within 90 days, the city council shall adopt an ordinance granting the vacation. 2. The City may require monetary compensation OR require a grant of an easement to the City. The City of Edmonds is not requiring an easement; thus, the City should be monetarily compensated for the vacation. ECDC 20.70.140.A.3.a allows the City to be monetarily compensated in the amount of up to one-half the fair market value for the street right-of-way being vacated. In considering the history of what the City has required in the past for compensation of vacated right-of-way, staff has reviewed street vacations going back to 1998. There was a series of City -initiated street vacations in 1998 (twelve in total) where the City Engineer identified rights -of -way that were either surplus to the needs of the City or, due to terrain and other topographical features, were unsuitable for construction of a roadway. For these twelve vacations initiated by the City, the vacating ordinances (Ordinances 3197 - 3208) noted that public interest outweighed the necessity to require compensation from abutting property owners. There have been eighteen other street vacations since 1998. Of these eighteen street vacations, eleven were required to pay compensation to the City. Six of the eleven paid the City one-half of the assessed value of the property. Four others compensated the City slightly less than one-half the assessed value due to other site restrictions, such as critical areas or recording of a covenant limiting future development potential. One paid more than one-half the assessed value due to differing appraisals. Seven of the street vacations were not required to pay compensation due to either the City being the property owner, the reservation of easements, obligation as part of a property sale and/or public benefit met without compensation. PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 6 of 9 Packet Pg. 320 9.2.a 3. An appraisal was included with the subject application for the property addressed 838 Fir Street, which assessed the value of the property before and after the proposed street vacation. The appraisal found the value of this property to be $1,000,000 before vacation and $1,035,000 after vacation, for a difference of $35,000. (Attachment 6). 4. For the requested street vacation, staff recommends monetary compensation of one- half the assessed value. This is consistent with past City practices and ECDC 20.70.140.A.3.a and supports the public benefit of said vacation. The appraised value as documented in Attachment 6 is $35,000. One-half of this fair market value is $17,500. The entire 17-foot width of undeveloped right-of-way that is the subject of this vacation request was dedicated with the Plat of Yost's First Addition to Edmonds, recorded in 1909 (Attachment 13). Therefore, upon vacation of the right-of-way, the land will be deeded to each of the abutting properties on the west and east sides of the vacation. VIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan designation for the properties directly adjacent to the proposed vacation is "Single Family — Urban 3." The comprehensive plan provides the following stated goals and policies for single-family residential development: Residential Development A. Goal. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. The options available to the City to influence the quality of housing for all citizens should be approached realistically in balancing economic, social, aesthetic and environmental considerations. A.1. Encourage those building custom homes to design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to harmonize with the surroundings, adding to the community identity and desirability. A.2. Protect neighborhoods from incompatible additions to existing buildings that do not harmonize with existing structures in the area. A.3. Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction or additions to existing structures. A.4. Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is economically feasible. A.5. Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses through the careful control of other types of development and expansion based upon the following principles: A.5.a Residential privacy is a fundamental protection to be upheld by local government. A.5.b. Traffic not directly accessing residences in a neighborhood must be discouraged. PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 7 of 9 Packet Pg. 321 9.2.a A.S. c. Stable property values must not be threatened by view, traffic or land use encroachments. A.5.d. Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc. A.6. Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, drainage, vegetation and habitat. (Comprehensive Plan; Adopted November 17, 2020, pg. 66 & 67) Nothing in the proposed right-of-way vacation is in conflict with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the proposal is not in conflict with the goals and policies of the Transportation Comprehensive Plan. As conditioned, the proposed street vacation would still be consistent with the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. VIII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis in and the attachments to this report, staff finds the requested vacation of unopened and undeveloped right-of-way to be in accordance with the criteria in ECDC 20.70.020 and the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution of intent for the right-of-way vacation and that the following conditions be addressed within 90 days of adoption of the resolution in accordance with ECDC 20.70.140.A.3: The petitioners shall deposit $17,500 with the City of Edmonds, which is one-half the appraised value of the vacation property, and which money, upon adoption of an ordinance vacating the property, shall belong to the City of Edmonds. IX. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application 2. Petition for Vacation 3. Vicinity Map 4. Vacation Survey 5. Legal Description of Vacation 6. Appraisal Information 7. Public Utilities Comments 8. Resolution No. 1501 9. Public Notice Material 10. Public Comments 11. Zoning and Vicinity Map 12. Public Works Memo of Compliance 13. Plat of Yost's First Addition to Edmonds PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 8 of 9 Packet Pg. 322 9.2.a X. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds 121 — 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Kent Scudder 838 Fir St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Sandra Schenkar 1108 9th Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Ziply c/o Mike HaKahan; Ziply OSP Engineer Via email: mike. hakahan(i�ziply.com Snohomish County PUD Distribution Engineering Services c/o Richard Dumo 1802 75th St. SW. Everett, WA 98206 PLN2022-0045 — Scudder Street Vacation Page 9 of 9 Ken Reidy Citizen of Edmonds Via email: kenreidykhotmail.com Chris & Deirdre Miller 1125 Sea Vista Pl. Edmonds, WA 98020 Comcast Construction, Planning & Design c/o John Warrick Via email: John Warrick@comcast.com South County Fire c/o Karl Fitterer 12425 Meridian Ave. S Everett, WA 98208 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Relations North c/o Patrick Robinson 19900 N. Creek Parkway, Bldg. G, Bothell, WA 98011 Packet Pg. 323 9.2.a ram. CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPermit.com Land Use Application #1155861 - Fir Street Alley Vacation Applicant First Name Last Name Company Name Kent Scudder Number Street Apartment or Suite Number E-mail Address 838 Fir Street kscudder(cr_noray.net City State Zip Phone Number Extension Edmonds WA 98020 (206) 715-4329 Contractor Company Name Number Street City State Zip State License Number License Expiration Date UBI # Project Location Number Street City Zip Code County Parcel Number Associated Building Permit Number Tenant Name Additional Information (i.e. equipment location or special instructions). Work Location Unopened alley south of Fir Street between C Avenue and 9th Ave S. Property Owner First Name Last Name or Company Name Number Street City State Zip Certification Statement - The applicant states: Apartment or Suite Number Phone Number Extension E-mail Address Floor Number Suite or Room Number Apartment or Suite Number I certify that I am the owner of this property or the owner's authorized agent. If acting as an authorized agent, I further certify that I have full power and authority to file this application and to perform, on behalf of the owner, all acts required to enable the jurisdiction to process and review such application. I have furnished true and correct information. I will comply with all provisions of law and ordinance governing this type of application. If the scope of work requires a licensed contractor to perform the work, the information will be provided prior to permit issuance. Date Submitted: 6/8/2022 Submitted By: Kent Scudder uF Iq O O N N O N Z J d C 0 r V r d N L Ir V! L 0 C �L V 3 a Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 324 9.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPerrnit.com Land Use Application #1155861 - Fir Street Alley Vacation Project Contact Company Name: Name: Kent Scudder Email: kscudder@noray.net Address: 838 Fir Street Phone #: (206) 715-4329 Edmonds WA 98020 Project Type Activity Type Scope of Work New New Development Activity Project Approval Project Name: Fir Street Alley Vacation Applicat Description of Avenue lon for the vacation of the 17-foot wide and 9th Ave S. extending south 119.9 feet from l alleyrt C m the south boundary of the F Work: Street right-of-way. Project Details Development Type Land Use uO v 0 0 N N 0 N Z J d c 0 r 0 cc m U) 0 4- 0� c �L cc 3 a Packet Pg. 325 Page 2 of 2 / 9.2.a J MyBui ld i n gPermit. com . cry; rc, Jurisdiction: Edmonds Project Name: Fir Street Alley Vacation Application ID: 1 ] 55861 Supplemental Name: Applicant Certification - Planning The applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. The property affected by the application is in the exclusive ownership of the applicant or that the application has been submitted with the consent of all owners of the affected property. I certify, under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that the information and exhibits herewith submitte are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on behalf of the owner of the subje property. I do so certify. u� 0 0 N N O N Z J a c 0 r v ca r a� m L U) L 0 �L :i a. Packet Pg. 326 9.2.a MyBui ldi ngPermit. cem .rcr of ech' Jurisdiction: Edmonds Project Name: Fir Street Alley Vacation Application ID: 1155861 Supplemental Name: Land Use Application If this is a new parcel or lot that does not yet have an address or a County tax account number, please describe the property and its location (otherwise, you may skip this question): (Not Applicable) LO Please describe the project and/or proposed use(s) you are seeking approval for with this application (you can upload a more detaile o filelletter later in the application, as necessary): C N N The application, in the form of a petition, seeks approval for the vacation of the 17-foot wide unopened dirt alley located between C Avenue N and 9th Ave S. extending south 119.9 feet from the south boundary of the Fir Street right-of-way. Z J M Check the boxes indicating all of the related approvals you are seeking for this project (including this application). NOTE THAT A SEPARATE APPLICATION I: r_ REQUIRED FOR EACH APPROVAL. 0 R Street Vacation V M r a� d L t) L W i �L M 0 a Packet Pg. 327 9.2.a PETITION FOR STREET OR ALLEY VACATION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON We, the undersigned owners of two-thirds of the real property abutting upon that public right-of-way described below, pursuant to RCW 35.79.010, do hereby petition the City of Edmonds to vacate said public right-of-way, described as follows: THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 6, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS AND A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF FIR STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88°40'14" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS; THENCE SOUTH 0117'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 119.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 ; THENCE NORTH 88°42'57" WEST 17.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE NORTH 01 °17'03"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 119.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. all situate in the City of Edmonds, County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and request that said City Council by Resolution fix a time and place when this Petition shall be heard and determined by that authority, which time shall not be more than sixty (60) days nor less than twenty (20) days after the passage of such Resolution. These pages are a group of pages containing an identical text and prayer intended by the signers of this Petition to be presented and considered as one Petition and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Petition. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. PRAYER OF PETITION: For the vacation of the 17-foot wide unopened dirt alley extending 119.9 feet south from the Fir Street right-of-way as described in the attached Exhibit A, and as shown in the attached Exhibit B. SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS DATE %t ct, Far x evi D . 6�mwva_,' a d !ZS_ C4i&XS vA`l.0 G-L 1� sP�.`J�� �Iw� v�.1 WA b 1 LZ -� �• -� �I'�� ��� j l a.� S-e�.1![s-� . P i . �� w� 5' f 3 � Orm Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 328 9.2.a i City of Edmonds VICINITY MAP 0 126.30 252.6 Feet 188.1 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is fo 2,257 p B p pp g reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTIW N N O N Z J O M Legend Sections Boundary d at Sections r N Edmonds Boundary LO ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIP ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLIN .� - L <all other values, d Interstate = V Principal Arterial Minor Arterial; Collector a Local Street fn State Highways - <all other values> E L -- 0 V 1 Q 2 06 r County Boundary O Parks N ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_WASHII ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES LO City of Edmonds C O City of Lynnwood N City of Mountlake Terrace G N Unincorporated King Cc; Unincor J a City of Woodway Citv of Arlinaton: Citv of Bothell: C N Notes U r r a j Packet Pg. 329 1 9.2.a FIR ST. o L1 17' ALLEY TO BE VACATED o ao V] I SCUDDER WW SCHENKAR ,y LOT 10 LOT 1 d' BLOCK 12 BLOCK 12 YOST'S FIRST ADD. M } YOST'S FIRST ADD. TO EDMONDS TO EDMONDS VOL. 8, PG. 6 a VOL. 8, PG. 6 x z H 0) 30' L2 30' I MILLER / I 4 LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 17.00 S88'40'14"E L2 17.00 N88`42'57"W SCALE - 1 " = 50' EXHIBIT B ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 330 9.2.a Exhibit A 17-foot Alley Vacation THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 6, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS AND A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF FIR STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88°40'14" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS; THENCE SOUTH 01°17'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 119.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 88°42'57" WEST 17.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE NORTH 01 °17'03"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 119.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 331 9.2.a ABS Valuation Robert J. Macaulay, MAI Jim E Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser 2927 Colby Avenue, Suite 100 Everett, WA 98201 425-258-2611 rmacaulay@absvaluation.com jdodae@absvaluation.corr absvaluation.com !f Appraisal Report Scudder Property 838 Fir Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 FOR Kent Scudder 838 Fir Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Date of Valuation: March 7, 2022 Date of Report: March 15, 2022 ABS Valuation Job # 22-0029 ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 332 9.2.a Corporate Office 419 Berkeley Avenue 2927 Colby Avenue Smith Tower Suite A Suite 100 506 2nd Avenue Fircrest, WA 98466 Everett, WA 98201 Suite 3200 253-274-0099 phone 425-258-2611 phone Seattle, WA 98104 425-252-1210fax 425-252-1210fax 206-209-3016 phone 425-252-1210fax absvaluation.com Appraisal Report March 15, 2022 Kent Scudder 838 Fir Street Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: APPRAISAL OF SCUDDER PROPERTY BEFORE AND AFTER VACATION OF AN ALLEY ADJOINING THE EAST BOUNDARY, LOCATED AT 838 FIR ST, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (Our File #22-0029). Dear Mr. Scudder: In response to your request, We have completed an appraisal of the above referenced property. The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opinion of fee simple market value before and after vacation of an alley abutting the subject property. The intended users are the client and City of Edmonds. The subject larger parcel consists of one tax parcel (006194-012-010-00), containing 0.33 acres or 14,375f SF according to Snohomish County Assessor records. The property has approximate dimensions of 119 feet by 120 feet situated 140f feet west of 9th Avenue S. The vacated alley has dimensions of 17 feet by 119.9f feet based on a survey prepared by Jouni Kalevi Paavola for a total area of 2,038f SF. The larger parcel after alley vacation will contain 16,413f SF. The larger parcel is improved with a single family residence built in 2006. The two-story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and not analyzed herein. The property is zoned RS-10, single family, 10,000 SF lots by the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. This appraisal was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Code of Professional Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. Complete descriptions of properties used for comparison are included in this report, as well as all of our analyses and conclusions. The value conclusions herein are given subject to the specific assumptions and limiting conditions stated in the Addenda of this report. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 333 9.2.a March 15, 2022 Mr. Kent Scudder Page 2 Based on our investigation and analysis of all relevant data, it is our opinion that the market value of the subject property before and after the alley vacation as of March 7, 2022 is: Market Value Before Vacation Market Value After Vacation Difference Sincerely, ABS VALUATION Robert J. Macaulay, MAI Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser $1,000,000 $1,035,000 $35,000 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 334 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................ 1 VicinityMap........................................................................................................... 2 AerialPhotograph.................................................................................................. 3 Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 Identification of the Subject Property........................................................................4 Summary of Appraisal Problem.................................................................................4 LegalDescription....................................................................................................4 Historyand Ownership............................................................................................4 Intended Use and Users...........................................................................................4 Date of Inspection/Valuation & Owner Contact...........................................................4 Purpose of the Appraisal..........................................................................................5 PropertyRights Appraised........................................................................................5 Scopeof the Appraisal.............................................................................................5 Competency Provision.............................................................................................5 LargerParcel..........................................................................................................5 Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions....................................................6 PersonalProperty....................................................................................................6 Exposure and Marketing Periods...............................................................................6 Area/Market/Neighborhood Descriptions.............................................................. 7 Boundaries/Larger Area...........................................................................................7 Population..............................................................................................................8 Business and Economic Activity................................................................................8 Neighborhood Description...................................................................................... 14 Overview.............................................................................................................. 14 SiteData.............................................................................................................. 16 Description of the Subject Property......................................................................... 16 SurveyMap.......................................................................................................... 19 AlleyVacation Legal............................................................................................. 20 Subject Property Photographs............................................................................. 21 Highestand Best Use........................................................................................... 22 AsVacant............................................................................................................22 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page i Packet Pg. 335 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY TABLE OF CONTENTS AsImproved........................................................................................................23 PropertyValuation............................................................................................... 24 Valuation -Before Vacation...................................................................................... 24 Conclusion of Land Value....................................................................................... 28 Site Valuation After Vacation.................................................................................. 29 Summary of Site Value Before and After Street Vacation...........................................29 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions................................................................... 30 Addenda............................................................................................................... 37 Comparable Property Information...........................................................................38 ZoningMap..........................................................................................................48 Qualifications of Appraiser......................................................................................49 Qualifications of Robert J. Macaulay, MAI.................................................................50 Qualifications of Jim E. Dodge................................................................................53 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page ii Packet Pg. 336 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary Project: Scudder property - alley vacation. Ostensible Owners: Kent M. Scudder Family Trust. Client: Kent Scudder. Intended User: The intended user of this report is the client and City of Edmonds Location: The parent property has a mailing address of 838 Fir Street, Edmonds, WA 98020. Access is by 119f feet of frontage on Fir Street. Site Size: Based on Snohomish County Assessor records, the parent property contains 0.33 acres or 14,375 SF. The rectangular shaped tract has an overall downward slope to the west. Improvements: The larger parcel is improved with a single family residence built in 2006. The two-story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and not analyzed herein. Utilities: The site has utility services of electricity, telephone, natural gas, public water and sanitary sewer available along its street frontage. Zoning: The larger parcel is zoned RS-10, Single Family 10,000 SF Lots according to the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. Highest & Best Use: The parent property is located in a prime residential neighborhood. A good grid system of streets provides access to surrounding residential areas and retail/commercial services. Most probable highest and best use of the subject larger parcel as if vacant is for single family residential development. The property as improved represents highest and best use of the subject property as if vacant. Market Value: Before Street Vacation: $1,000,000 After Street Vacation: $1,035,000 Difference: $35,000 Date of Valuation: March 7, 2022 Date of Report: March 15, 2022 Appraisers: Robert J. Macaulay, MAI Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 1 Packet Pg. 337 Vicinity Map KiNstou Fw,� i k Puget at 5'Ll Caspefs St THE BOWL OF EDMONDS J10116 s � �¢ n `m El Edmonds 6 x t: Main St Y ID lb 4y$Y 838 Fir St, EdmandSr WA 98020 220tn S1 su 104 . Woodway Espe r 22Bth St SW ,,tat PCC CortimtJni#y�� '• Markets - Edmonds � 7 w. a Kruckeberg Botanic Garden 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY VICINITY MAP Lynnwood Ice Ce 212th S1 SW WinCc Foods 22Dth St Svo., { 99 Ranch Market knce {� 7 WhirlyBall ICostco Wholesale, ht 2P4sh $� .I ECHO LASE 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 2 Packet Pg. 338 Aerial Photograph A r 7' k +� -NIL, Ilk- 1 1 4. Al. E % 1 14- 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH V le Q O N N O N Z J a c 0 cc V m L L C �L m a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 3 Packet Pg. 339 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Introduction Identification of the Subject Property The subject larger parcel consists of one tax parcel located at 838 Fir Street, Edmonds, WA. The property is situated on the south side of Fir St, 140f feet west of 9th Ave S. Based on Snohomish County Assessor records the larger parcel contains 0.33 acres or 14,375± SF. The rectangular shaped tract has approximate dimensions of 100 feet by 120. Summary of Appraisal Problem The purpose of the report is to provide an opinion of the fee simple market value of the parent tract before and after vacation of the alley. The alley vacation lies along the eastern boundary of the parent tract with dimensions of 17 feet by 119.9f feet based on the provided survey. The property is zoned RS-10, single family 10,000 SF lots according to the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. Legal Description No title report was provided. The subject parent property is briefly described as Lot 10, Block 12, Yost's 1st Addition to Edmonds as recorded in Volume 8 of Plats, page 6, Snohomish County, WA. Snohomish County Tax Parcel No. is; 006194-012-010-00. History and Ownership The parent property was purchased by Statutory Warranty Deed 6/22/2017 and recorded under A.F. No. 201706280190. Transaction price was $1,585,000 for land and improvements. Intended Use and Users The intended use of this appraisal is to provide an opinion of market value before and after an alley vacation. Intended user of the report is the client, Kent Scudder and City of Edmonds. Date of Inspection/Valuation & Owner Contact The subject property was inspected by Jim Dodge on March 7, 2022 and accompanied by Kent Scudder. The effective date of this appraisal is March 7, 2022. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 4 Packet Pg. 340 SCUDDER PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Appraisal The purpose of this appraisal is to provide an opinion of the market value of the subject property before and after vacation of an adjoining alley on the eastern boundary of the larger parcel, as of March 7, 2022. Market value is defined as:1 "the amount in cash, or on terms reasonably equivalent to cash, for which in all probability the property would have sold on the effective date of the appraisal, after a reasonable exposure time on the open competitive market, from a willing and reasonably knowledgeable seller to a willing and reasonably knowledgeable buyer, with neither acting under any compulsion to buy or sell, giving due consideration to all available economic uses of the property at the time of the appraisal. " Property Rights Appraised This appraisal is of fee simple interest as encumbered by existing easements. Fee simple interest is defined as:2 Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. Scope of the Appraisal This appraisal fulfills the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. The appraisal assignment included on -site inspection of the subject parcel; evaluation of local and regional economic conditions; analysis of market supply and demand; determination of highest and best use; and preparation of value estimates by the relevant approaches to value. The scope of this appraisal involves the Sales Comparison. The Income and Cost Approaches are not relevant in valuing land only. In appraising the subject property, the appraisers did the following: • Researched CoStar, CBA and NWMLS databases • Researched ABS Valuation existing database • Confirmed all sales with buyers, sellers, their agents, and/or public records • Inspected all comparable sales • Reviewed all documents as cited throughout this report Competency Provision Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser, has previously appraised similar property and has the training and experience needed to competently complete this assignment. Larger Parcel In analyzing the subject property, the larger land in the vicinity under similar ownership. parcel must be considered. There is no other 'Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions, Page 10, Section 1.2.4 2 From The Appraisal of Real Estate, Fifteenth Edition, 2020, Appraisal Institute 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 5 Packet Pg. 341 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY INTRODUCTION Extraordinary Assumptions/Hypothetical Conditions Extraordinary assumption is defined as an assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, as of the effective date of the assignment results, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraisers' opinions or conclusions. Extraordinary assumptions presume as fact otherwise uncertain information about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis. No extraordinary assumption is made. Hypothetical condition is defined as a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results but is used in the analysis. Hypothetical conditions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis. No hypothetical condition is made. Hazardous Waste We have been provided no information regarding the presence or absence of hazardous waste on the subject property. This report assumes the absence of any and all hazardous waste on the subject property. If hazardous waste is found to be present on the subject property, we reserve the right to change the valuation contained in this report. Access and Utility Easements No title was provided. Review of available public records indicated there are no known access or utility easements which would adversely affect use or market value of the subject property. Personal Property There is no personal property included in our analysis. Exposure and Marketing Periods Exposure and marketing periods are the respective timeframes before and after the date of valuation that are necessary to sell the subject property at the appraised value. The two periods may differ depending upon a variety of factors, including changes in market conditions or property characteristics. The exposure and marketing periods are considered to be similar for the parent tract and concluded to be one to nine months. The global outbreak of a "novel coronavirus" (known as COVID-19) was officially declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is currently unknown what direct, or indirect, effect, if any, this event may have on the national economy, the local economy, or the market in which the subject property is located. The reader is cautioned and reminded that the conclusions presented in this appraisal report apply only as of the effective date(s) indicated. The appraiser makes no representation as to the effect on the subject property of this event, or any event, subsequent to the effective date of the appraisal. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 6 Packet Pg. 342 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Area/Market/Neighborhood Descriptions Boundaries/Larger Area The larger market area is defined as Snohomish County, located on Puget Sound in the north central portion of western Washington, between Skagit County to the north and King County to the south. Snohomish County is the third most populous county in the state behind King and Pierce counties. The county encompasses approximately 2,100 square miles, of which 43%± (to the east) includes portions of the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest and the Glacier Peak Wilderness Area. Most of the population is concentrated in the foothills of the Cascades and the Puget Sound lowlands. The Puget Sound region has emerged as an area not only known for Boeing, but also as a global center for high technology. Seattle, the "Emerald City," and the centerpiece of Puget Sound, continues to be ranked as one of the most desirable cities in which to live and do business. The region has a solid economic base, which continues to keep pace with growth in high-tech industries and with development throughout the Pacific Rim. However, with all the attention and growth come the typical problems of congestion, environmental contamination, and depletion of natural resources. Puget Sound, like most metropolitan areas, is squarely facing the challenge of striking a balance between economic growth and the preservation of its quality of life. The Puget Sound basin is a major lowland area located between the Olympic and Cascade mountain ranges in northwest Washington State. The area is defined by the Puget Sound, a major inland body of saltwater lying between the two mountain ranges and connected to the Pacific Ocean via the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The Puget Sound basin incorporates four counties: King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap. The city of Seattle, recognized as the hub of the Puget Sound region, is located in King County on the east side of Puget Sound. Pierce County is adjacent to the south of King County; Snohomish County is adjacent to King County to the north; and Kitsap County is located directly west of King County across Puget Sound. The Puget Sound region offers diverse economic opportunities and the best of social, governmental, and health services. The area also boasts a rich array of cultural, entertainment, and recreational opportunities. The city of Seattle has a professional ballet, opera, and symphony and several live theatrical companies. Public and private joint ventures were successful in constructing Safeco Field and Century Link Field providing new homes for professional baseball, football, and soccer teams which continue to shape the "SODO" neighborhood, south of Seattle's Central Business District (CBD). The varied topography of the region offers outdoor activities ranging from boating to snow skiing and other mountain sports. With Puget Sound as a centerpiece, the region is one of the premiere recreational boating areas in the country. Both the Cascade and Olympic Mountains offer countless recreational activities in settings ranging from rainforests to marine vistas to rugged volcanic peaks. Mount Rainier, a classically cone -shaped, dormant volcano, is a trademark visible throughout the Puget Sound region. The region supports several state universities and colleges, and numerous private and community colleges. The University of Washington, founded in 1851 and located in Seattle, 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 7 Packet Pg. 343 is one of the largest universities respected and productive research for achievements in fields such as 25 years or older hold a Bachelor' nation for higher education. 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS on the West Coast. It is also one of the most highly centers in the country, garnering international attention medicine and physics. Thirty percent of state residents Degree or higher, ranking Washington State 11t" in the Historically, the Puget Sound region has received a great deal of favorable publicity on a national level. Magazine, radio, and television stories have highlighted the vitality of the Northwest and its exceptional quality of life. For the last 20 years, the region experienced a large in -migration of business and population, the result of which has been tremendous growth and consequentially congestion and higher real estate prices. After a downturn in the local economy following the September 2001 tragedies, the region rebounded to pre-9/11 economic and employment numbers with solid growth in jobs, per capita income and retail sales. Most local forecasters predict another recovery from the recent recession at a pace similar to that of the nation. Population King, Pierce, Kitsap and Snohomish counties are the most populated counties within Washington State, as of April 2020, these counties contained 55%± of the state's total population. The region's annual population double-digit growth rate of the 1990's has cooled since the turn of the century. Driving this trend was a slowdown, then recession, in the region's economy primarily due to the burst of the tech bubble in early 2000 and subsequent job losses in the technology and aerospace sectors. Prior to 2000, about two-thirds of the state population growth came from persons moving to Washington — attracted by the state's good employment climate relative to nearby states and the nation as a whole. Since 2000, that number has fluctuated from between 39% in 2003 & 2010, 65% in 2006 & 2007 and a high of 76% for 2019 of net in -migration. Population Growth King County 1,931,249 2,052,800 2,105,100 2,153,700 2,190,200 2,226,300 2,260,800 2,293,300 Snohomish County 713,335 757,600 772,860 789,400 805,120 818,700 830,500 844,400 Pierce County 795,225 830,120 844,490 859,400 872,220 888,300 900,700 917,100 Kitsap County 251,133 258,200 262,590 264,300 267,120 270,100 272,200 275,600 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management, April 2021 Business and Economic Activity Overview The economic base of the state of Washington is anchored in lumber and wood products, aircraft manufacturing, high technology, agriculture, and marine -based industries. Puget Sound has also established itself as a major shipping and distribution center whose importance grows with the continued development of the Pacific Rim. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 8 Packet Pg. 344 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS In the Puget Sound metropolitan area, aircraft manufacturing by the Boeing Company is most important, but is slowly becoming less of a factor, due to the diversification of the regional economy through an increase in high technology companies. Microsoft has grown to be just as important to Seattle employment as Boeing. In addition to Microsoft the region is also headquarters to several top U.S. companies, including Weyerhaeuser, Paccar, Burlington Resources, Nordstrom, Safeco, Starbucks, Alaska Airlines, and Costco Wholesale. There have also been some recent additions to the area in the form of internet-based companies, such as Amazon.com, Adobe, and Real Networks. The Boeing Company In the 1970s and 1980s, the economic well-being of the region rose and fell with swings at Boeing. During the past decade, this dependency has diminished. Even with the typically fluctuating employment at Boeing, the region's total employment rose steadily upward. This constant increase can mostly be attributed to the robust growth in high technology jobs. Overall, the region's economy remains somewhat linked to Boeing's fortunes, but substantially less so than in previous decades. Though Boeing remains an important factor in the Puget Sound economy, significant changes in the health of Boeing's operations can still have a relatively large impact on the overall condition of the area, as exhibited by the layoffs that have occurred over the recent past. After the September 11th tragedy, sales of aircraft, and estimated future sales decreased dramatically. Boeing, in an attempt to balance their situation relocated their corporate headquarters to the business -friendly Chicago area and laid off 23,000 workers nationwide. In an attempt to return jobs to the Seattle area, city and state leaders won the bid in 2007 to become the final assembly center for the new Boeing 787 wide -body jet. Boeing's long term - market outlook calls for obtaining 1/2 of the sales of the anticipated 20,000 new planes that will be built over the next two decades, or an average of 500 per year. The first 787 was scheduled to enter passenger service in May 2008; however, delays pushed the first delivery date to September 2011, achieving a production rate of 10 airplanes per month in late 2012. They report Washington State aerospace employment (including contract workers) to be about 81,000 as of December 2014. High Technology High technology companies have steadily grown to become the major economic factor over the past decade. Microsoft has grown to become the largest, and most well-known, high-tech company in the region. As of December 2014, they employ 41,664 in the Puget Sound area and continue to post gains in net revenue and net income in each of the past 10 years, except for 2009. Microsoft is nearly maximized their employment at the primary Redmond Headquarters and has leased 1.3 million square feet of space in two different buildings in Bellevue, which will house 4,000 employees. Microsoft's influence in the area has brought a number of high-technology companies to the area. For the most part, all of these high-tech companies have formed 'clusters" in the region, with the largest and most highly concentrated cluster located on the "Eastside." The Eastside is the area located east of Seattle and Lake Washington, and includes the cities of Redmond, Bellevue, Bothell, Kirkland, and Issaquah. While Seattle has the second largest amount, almost 80% of high-tech jobs can be found on the Eastside, with Redmond having the most of any city in the region. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 9 Packet Pg. 345 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Most biotech jobs are located near the University of Washington, and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center on Lake Union. The clustering of these companies can be attributed to the fact that newer startup businesses and competing companies want to be located near the University and research center in order to become part of their knowledge transfer network. In addition, locating in proximity to existing successful companies provides a startup with access to a highly skilled, trained workforce. Employment Two-thirds of the total jobs in the Puget Sound region are located in King County. Roughly one-half of King County's jobs are located in the city of Seattle. Continuing growth in the region has made the political lines separating the counties increasingly artificial. The labor force often travels from Pierce and Snohomish Counties across county lines to their place of employment; only slightly more than half the King County labor force actually resides in the county. Historically on a statewide level, through 2008, the labor force and employment increased, in the face of fluctuating unemployment as is shown in the chart below. This trend reversed in 2009 as employment declined until a recovery began in 2012. Labor Force and Unemployment, Washington 2000-2022 r LaborYea •rce Employment Unemployment Rate 2000 3,059,545 2,901,730 157,815 5.2% 2001 3,038,958 2,847,661 191,297 6.3% 2002 3,083,044 2,855,168 227,876 7.4% 2003 3,126,825 2,895,331 231,494 7.4% 2004 3,196,362 2,996,430 199,932 6.3% 2005 3,263,918 3,082,806 181,112 5.5% 2006 3,323,729 3,156,030 167,699 5.0% 2007 3,403,542 3,243,709 159,833 4.7% 2008 3,479,083 3,290,590 188,493 5.4% 2009 3,535,712 3,212,466 323,246 9.1% 2010 3,510,955 3,160,567 350,388 10.0% 2011 3,461,929 3,140,993 320,936 9.3% 2012 3,471,266 3,189,356 281,910 8.1% 2013 3,463,772 3,220,512 243,260 7.0% 2014 3,489,528 3,275,766 213,762 6.1% 2015 3,546,199 3,346,373 199,826 5.6% 2016 3,635,704 3,443,952 191,752 5.3% 2017 3,719,280 3,543,908 175,372 4.7% 2018 3,790,481 3,620,266 170,215 4.5% 2019 3,912,667 3,745,751 166,916 4.3% 2020 3,912,795 3,583,955 328,840 8.4% 2021 3,893,983 3,691,775 202,208 5.2% 2022-YTD 3,961,146 3,786,484 174,662 4.4% Source: WA State Employment Security Department, March 2022 seasonally adjusted 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 10 Packet Pg. 346 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS The Covid 19 pandemic has significantly impacted employment nationwide and in the State of Washington with forced shut -downs of many businesses. Washington State Employment Security Department reported that the unemployment rate began climbing in March with a rate of 5.1%. April 2020 peaked at a rate of 16.3%. The trend has been downward since, with a rate of 4.4% in January of 2022. One cannot underestimate the local effect of military presence in our state. Joint Base Lewis-McChord employs more people that Microsoft and when combined with the Naval Shipyards in Bremerton exceeds even Boeing. It was reported that in 2009 Defense Spending in Washington was over $13 billion. Local governments contribute significantly as well. Washington State and the Puget Sound region specifically continue to draw business and labor here, perceived as a desirable place to live. Washington ranked No. 6 among a list of "The 10 States that will boom over the next 5 Years" in the November 2012 issue of Forbes, a ranking based on a study by the National Chamber Foundation. This is based on "strong aerospace and technology sectors and a vibrant export economy," according to Forbes. Other factors include productivity, livability, tax structure and regulatory burden, exports and trade and an atmosphere for fostering innovation. The magazine has previously ranked Washington as one of the five best states in America to do business. Immigration/In-migration An important contributor to growth in the Puget Sound is its advantage over California in affordability and quality of life. Puget Sound offered less expensive land and housing, and less congestion in a similar, if somewhat more rainy, West Coast setting. For the past two decades, an influx of Californians has fueled the region's escalating real estate market. As a result, while the high quality of life remains an attractive factor, land and housing prices have risen to the point that they provide an offset to that quality of life. Despite the national economic upheaval, the region continues to experience in -migration from other parts of the United States, though at much lower rates. The area is perceived as having a labor surplus. In addition, these are for the most part highly skilled, computer savvy workers. People of all education levels perceive the region as one offering many employment opportunities. The lack of employment in Alaska and the Rocky Mountain and High Plains states has contributed to the area's population increases. The Puget Sound region has also seen significant immigration from several Asian, North American, and Central American nations. Transportation Growth in the Puget Sound region has resulted in the Seattle area becoming the most traffic -congested region in the nation. To alleviate congestion, the Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) was formed and has completed construction on the first segment of a high -capacity light rail transit system between downtown Seattle and Sea-Tac Airport while continuing to study long-range growth and transportation strategies for central Puget Sound. Major expansions and revisions are either proposed, underway, or completed on Interstate 405 (I-405), the primary north/south arterial serving the Eastside's high-tech corridor, as well as to the University of Washington, just north of downtown. Sea-Tac International Airport's most recent report of statistics states it is the 16t" busiest airport in the nation for passenger service. The airport is home to twenty-five scheduled 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 11 Packet Pg. 347 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS passenger airlines that serve 75 non-stop domestic and 21 international destinations. In order to accommodate the roughly 862 aircraft operations per day, the Port of Seattle continues with its 10-year, $2 billion renovation project in order to help the airport better provide services into the next century. In addition to Sea-Tac, the region has jumbo -jet capable airports in south Seattle (Boeing Field) and Everett (Paine Field), both sites of significant Boeing activity. The Port of Seattle and Port of Tacoma are major marine shipping facilities. Together the two ports represent the country's second largest load center for containerized cargo. In order to capture their share of the future container traffic, which is projected to grow by an average of 4.1% per year annually over the next 20 years, the two ports have completed major expansions which have consumed most of the land readily available. The Port of Seattle broke its cargo volume record in 2011 with more than 2.1 million TEU's (20-foot equivalent units) due in part to its "fee free" policy and ability to receive larger ships in port. This ranked them 6t" in the country for TEU volume. Cargo handled at the Port of Seattle's seaport generates over 135,000 jobs for Washington and creates over $2 billion in annual business revenue for the region. Residential Market Trends in single-family residential development vary among the Puget Sound counties depending on factors such as: • Population (changes) • Economic activity and employment centers • Income levels • Supply of developable land • Infrastructure • Permitting processes Obviously, this is not an exhaustive list of relevant factors. However, the point to be made is that each county will grow in different ways based on specific criteria. Since the Puget Sound region is somewhat interdependent, it is logical that the smaller, less populous counties will react to factors affecting the King County market. The Growth Management Act (GMA) has been in effect since the early 1990s to further protect the unique Pacific Northwest quality of life. The GMA directs the state's most populous and fastest growing counties and their cities to prepare comprehensive land use plans that anticipate growth and impact for a 20-year horizon. The GMA policies encourage dense development within defined urban growth areas, leaving outlying areas rural with the goal of reducing urban sprawl, protecting rural areas, and more efficiently providing roads, parks, and other services. Neighborhoods with existing infrastructure and available land will provide increasingly dense housing options. Alternatively, rural developments of large tracts (5-, 10-, and 20-acre homesites) have occurred increasingly in areas that cannot meet infrastructure requirements for more dense development under the GMA. This has a direct effect on residential growth and development. Additional GMA guidelines require all jurisdictions to classify, designate, and regulate resource lands and critical areas. Regional citizens are also now faced with land development restrictions stemming from the creation of these more specific Critical Areas Ordinances, which consider wetlands, erosion, landslide, aquatic areas, and wildlife among others. These wide-ranging protections which define permitted uses, buffer areas and 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 12 Packet Pg. 348 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS setback requirements have affected businesses, developers, and homeowners alike, adding layers of study, permitting, and cost to the development process. Snohomish and Pierce Counties continue to experience single-family development and construction at significantly lower price levels than King County according to data from the Northwest Multiple Listing Service. Over the past year, King County median home price rose 8.9%; prices increased 9.2% in Snohomish County, 8.7% in Pierce County and 0.8% in Kitsap County. The November 2015 median prices ranged from a high of $479,000 in King County to a low of $245,000 in Kitsap County. Economic Forecast Puget Sound Economic Forecaster utilizes a housing market index comprised of three indicators: closed home sales, average real home price and average time on the market. Between the first and second quarters of 2008, all 3 components worked to pull the composite index down, for the first time in several years. That drop marked the end of the regional housing bubble and confirmed that a recession was underway, followed by falling home prices, massive losses in the stock market and a sluggish increase in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Many economists now see mid-2009 as the low point of the recession, and indeed recent information shows U.S Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has advanced without interruption since mid-2009, albeit at rates less than 3%. However, employment actually fell in 2009 and 2010 before finally adding jobs in 2011 with unemployment slowly increasing into 2016. The Forecaster economists remain modestly optimistic in their national predictions of a slow and steady recovery of employment during the next few years. Their long-term forecast for the Puget Sound employment growth averages 1.4% over the next 10-year period and 0.3% faster than the national rate. This is despite their assertion that neither Microsoft nor Boeing will contribute much to job creation, having already adjusted their local workforce to fit future needs. Many are cautiously optimistic as the employment level increases and unemployment rate declines over the next ten years. Conclusion The Puget Sound Region has experienced tremendous growth since the 1980s which has contributed to major congestion, inflated housing prices, and increased land use regulations to limit environmental deterioration. As in the 1990s and throughout the first decade of the new millennium, the challenge for the region continues to be creating a balance that will allow growth in industry while preserving the natural amenities that attracted many here in the first place. Increasingly, the various Puget Sound governments are agreeing to regional planning in order to confront the area's problems, particularly with regard to environmental and transportation issues. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 13 Packet Pg. 349 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Neighborhood Description Overview The City of Edmonds is situated on the shore of Puget Sound, midway between the cities of Seattle and Everett. The 5.679 square mile town is in the southwestern corner of Snohomish County. The principal geographic feature of Edmonds is its waterfront location and outstanding water and mountain views. The city lies generally south of 156th Street SW, west of 76th Avenue W, and north of 220th Street SW. Also included within the city limits is Stevens Memorial Hospital and to the southeast there is a small pocket of incorporated land between Highway 99, Lake Ballinger and 244th Street SW. Edmonds was established in 1890, when timber was the primary industry. The last sawmill closed in 1951 and the city is now largely residential in nature. Most of the city's commercial development is found in downtown, along the waterfront and on Edmonds Way and Highway 99. Most businesses are retail in nature and cater to the local community. Topography within the city limits is generally sloping upward from Puget Sound, leveling out onto undulating benchland. The western half of the city has good westerly views. Main east -west commercial thoroughfares include Edmonds Way (SR 104), Main Street and 196th Street SW (SR 524). Main north -south arterials include 5th Avenue, 9th Avenue and 76th Avenue W. Freeway access is good; there are interchanges approximately 1/2 mile east of the city at 220th, 236th and 244th Streets SW. Another factor which may positively affect the local economy is the Amtrak station west of downtown, which has become part of Sound Transit, a regional rail transit system. Population Population growth for Edmonds, the third largest city in Snohomish County and surrounding cities is summarized below. Population Trends Brier 6,087 6,500 6,555 6,560 6,605 6,665 6,760 6,815 Edmonds 39,709 40,490 40,900 41,260 41,820 42,170 42,470 42,780 Everett 103,019 105,800 108,300 109,800 111,200 111,800 112,700 114,700 Lynnwood 35,836 36,420 36,590 36,950 38,260 39,600 40,690 41,020 Marysville 60,020 64,140 64,940 65,900 67,040 67,820 69,180 70,040 Mill Creek 18,244 19,760 19,900 19,960 20,470 20,590 20,590 20,720 Mountlake Terrace 19,909 21,090 21,090 21,290 21,560 21,590 21,660 22,640 Snohomish County 713,335 757,600 772,860 789,400 805,120 818,700 830,500 844,400 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management, April 2021 The City of Edmonds population has increased at an annual rate 0.7 % since 2010, whereas Snohomish County has increased at 1.67%. The lower growth rate of Edmonds as compared to Snohomish County and most surrounding cities is due primarily to the absence of available vacant land. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 14 Packet Pg. 350 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY AREA/MARKET/NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTIONS Employment The city's largest employer is Stevens Memorial Hospital, located in the 76th Ave corridor that anchors the growing medical district. The largest employment sector is retail trade and services located in the Historic downtown, Highway 99, SR 104 and waterfront areas. Ferry traffic and the resulting tourist trade are also a significant part of the local economy. Because Edmonds is mainly a bedroom community with little manufacturing base, the local economy is dependent on employment growth in Snohomish and King counties. Land Use Most of the land in Edmonds is residential in character. Residences are primarily single family, but there is a growing multi -family segment in and around downtown, most of which is condominiums. Multi -family development is also found around Stevens Memorial Hospital and along major thoroughfares. There are few manufacturing and industrial land uses in Edmonds. The largest commercial uses are neighborhood shopping centers along Edmonds Way and several office buildings in and near downtown. Most commercial development consists of small offices and shops, in keeping with the city's small town atmosphere. Edmonds is an affluent community, which is reflected in its median home sale price of $861,000±. Housing affordability is a concern. Governmental Edmonds provides a full range of services including water, sewer, garbage collection, police, fire, public transportation and primary education. Like many suburban communities in the region, Edmonds has sizable areas zoned for residential use. In compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act of 1991, the city has adopted interim urban growth boundaries and is updating its comprehensive plan. Conclusion The City of Edmonds is a medium-sized city of 42,780, situated along the Puget Sound shoreline. Because of its waterfront location and outstanding views, Edmonds is an attractive place to live and work. The desirable amenities are reflected in increasing real estate values, particularly for property with westerly marine views. This is consistent for both residential and commercial property. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 15 Packet Pg. 351 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY SITE DATA Site Data Description of the Subject Property Site The subject larger parcel is located at 838 Fir Street, Edmonds, Washington. The subject site is situated on the south side of Fir St, 140f feet west of 9th Ave S. Topography The larger parcel has an overall upward slope to the east providing good water views to the west. Access The property has 119f feet of frontage on Fir Street, a public asphalt paved minor arterial Sensitive Areas The subject property is designated a Zone X, area of minimal flood hazard by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map Number 53061C 1315 F, effective date June 19, 2020. No wetland information was provided. The appraiser reserves the right to revise the herein value conclusions upon receipt of any wetland data or delineation. Utilities The site has electrical, telephone, natural gas, public water and sanitary sewer service available at the property boundary. Zoning The subject property is zoned RS-10, single family 10,000 SF lots according to the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. Purpose of the RS-10 zone is to reserve and regulate areas for single-family residential dwellings. Permitted uses include a single family dwellings, churches, schools and public facilities. Below is a table of development standards for the RS-10 zoning designation. Standard RS-10 Minimum lot area 10,000 SF Maximum density 4.4 du's/acre Minimum lot width 75 feet Setback front 25 feet Setback rear/abuts residential 20 feet Setback side/abuts residential 10 feet Maximum lot coverage 35% Maximum building height 25 feet 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 16 Packet Pg. 352 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY SITE DATA Easements and Encumbrances No title report was provided. Review of available public records revealed no unusual easements or encumbrances that would adversely affect market value of the subject larger parcel. Assessed Value and Real Estate Taxes Below is the current assessed value and tax burden for the subject property. Assessed Value and Taxes ParcelTax . Improvements Tota1 006194-012-010-00 $835,700 $669,100 $1,504,800 $12,575.21 Site Improvements The larger parcel has good quality residential landscaping. Building Improvements The larger parcel is improved with a 3,730 SF single family residence built in 2006. The two- story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and therefore not analyzed herein. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 17 Packet Pg. 353 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY SITE DATA PLAT MAP V Iq 0 0 N N O N Z J a c 0 cc V m m d L L O �L m a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 18 Packet Pg. 354 SCUDDER PROPERTY PROJECT PLAN Survey M a p � \ � EL Ty \ S � S -2±* H±e \ I 7 §\\3\ m 2>7 6 99' eL *_ML QS o¥R wpm q §7\ E� � 2 . _roc 7fA §5EO (§@7w §@cu \=2 | )� Ln R ']AY D 2 04 k z a § k > / ¥ � tm : 0 _ 2 � a 22-0029 - Scudder Pro«r % 2022 ABS Valuation Page !g Packet Pg. 355 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY PROJECT PLAN Alley Vacation Legal E Nbtt A 174 of Ailey Vacaflon THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS. AL`AZ�OftDING TO THE PL..A7 7HEF1E0F ACCORDEV IN VpI,UW 8 Or PuaM F�AOE 6, PICCOR05 OF $NOl"OMPSH COUNTY. WASHINGTON- MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIEED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NOftTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10_ OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS AND A POt"T ON THE SOLFfH MARGIN OF FIR STREET; THENCE $OUTH Q8"44'14" i ALONG E,AID 5QgjEH M+7WW4, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YCST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS: THENCE SOUTH 01 `17'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 119-M FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1. THENCE N FFrrH 99'42'57" WEST 17_¢0 FEET TO THE 3QVTHEP$T CORN EF1 QF $AID LQ'i 1Q; THENCE NORTH 01"17'03"EASI ALOhtG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 11e.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF 13EGI N N ING SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 20 Packet Pg. 356 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS Subject Property Photographs 1. Southerly view of alley right of way from Fir Street. 2. Looking north toward Fir Street along alley right of way. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 357 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and Best Use Highest and best use is defined as: 1 The highest and most profitable use for which the property is adaptable and needed or likely to be needed in the reasonably near future A determination of highest and best use is guided by the following parameters: 1) physically possible; 2) legally permissible; 3) financially feasible; and 4) must result in the highest value. Physically possible uses require an analysis of both the improvements (existing or proposed), as well as the underlying land. Size, topography, shape, access, soil conditions, wetlands, and utilities are all factors that can affect the development potential of a given site. With regard to the improvements, obviously, it must be physically possible to construct a building before it can be considered the highest and best use. Legally permitted uses are those which fall within current zoning laws and are permitted by all agencies having jurisdiction. These may include federal, state, and local laws; zoning; easements and deed restrictions; as well as the possibility for reasonable zoning changes and variances. The financially feasible category analyzes those uses that are physically possible, legally permitted, and which provide an adequate investor return. For income properties, this return is measured monetarily, while non -income -producing properties provide a somewhat less tangible measure of return. Risk is a primary determinant in the assessment of adequate return. Finally, the uses satisfying all of the above criteria can be analyzed. The one use providing the highest return is considered maximally productive, and thus, the highest and best use. As Vacant Physically Possible. The larger parcel as identified herein is a rectangular shaped tract containing 0.33 acres or 14,375 SF according to Snohomish County Assessor records. The site has an overall downward slope to the west providing good water views. Access is by 119f feet of frontage on Fir Street. Legally Permissible. The site is zoned single family by the City of Edmonds Zoning Code. The RS-10 designation is oriented toward single family development with churches, schools and public facilities also permitted. Minimum lot size is the designation is 10,000 SF per lot. 1 From The Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions, 2016 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 22 Packet Pg. 358 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY HIGHEST AND BEST USE Financially Feasible/Maximally Productive. The maximally productive use is that use producing the highest residual land value. Based on surrounding uses, single family zoning and market demand, the maximally productive use of the subject site is concluded to be for single family residential development. As Improved The subject larger parcel is improved with a 3,730 SF single family residence built in 2006. The two-story residence contains 1,961 SF of main floor and 1,769 SF of second floor area. The subject residence is not affected by the street vacation and therefore not analyzed herein. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 23 Packet Pg. 359 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Property Valuation Valuation -Before Vacation The scope of the assignment is to estimate the market value of the subject property before and after vacation of an adjoining alley along the eastern boundary. Approaches Used in the Valuation Process — The valuation is obtained by the proper use of three different approaches to the value conclusion: the Cost Approach, the Income Approach, and the Sales Comparison Approach. These three approaches are different in character but, related somewhat in the known facts they require to arrive at an opinion of value from each. The final conclusion of value is derived through a correlation process in which the appraiser weighs one approach against the other to determine the relative merits of each before coming to a conclusion. The Cost Approach to Value is the process of first determining the value of the subject land, to which is added the replacement cost new of the structure, less depreciation and the cost of land improvements. The sum of the costs is the indication of value by the Cost Approach. The subject property building improvements are not affected by the street vacation and not included in the analysis. Therefore, the Cost Approach is not used. The Income Approach to Value involves the estimation of a gross economic rental, which is then processed by subtracting an estimated vacancy and credit loss and operating expenses to obtain an estimated net operating income. The net operating income is then capitalized into a value conclusion by the appropriate capitalization rate derived from the market. Land is not typically purchased based on its ability to generate an income stream. Therefore, the Income Approach is not relevant and not utilized. The Sales Comparison Approach to Value is a comparative technique which utilizes sales of comparable properties and analyzes them to determine an applicable sale price per unit to apply to the subject's underlying land. In this case, the subject will be analyzed on an overall residential site basis. Final Correlation and Conclusion of Value the various indications of value from the approaches are analyzed as to how they relate to one another, as well as to the market. The approach or approaches most appropriate are given the most consideration in arriving at a final opinion of value. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 24 Packet Pg. 360 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Site Valuation Residential land is typically purchased on an overall site basis. Based on the concluded highest and best use, we have analyzed a series of sales that reflect the market for the subject larger parcel. All sales considered comparable to the subject were utilized. Comparable sales are adjusted for variation in market conditions, location, size, useable area, zoning, topography and utilities. Comparable Land Sales Tabulation Land PriceSale per No. • . Date Sale Price Zone Subj 838 Fir St, Edmonds NA NA RS-10 14,375 NA 1 21222 Pioneer Wy N, Edmonds 8/14/20 $240,000 RS-8 10,000 $24.00 2 22521 82nd AV W, R- Edmonds 8/21/19 $310,000 8400 15,682 $19.77 3 22328 88th AV W, R- Edmonds 8/19/21 $652,000 8400 16,117 $40.45 4 131 Skyline Dr, Edmonds 8/18/20 $1,000,000 RS-12 13,939 $71.74 The following discussion of sales relates to the comparables presented in the above chart Comparable 1 is the sale of a 0.23 acre (10,019 SF) single family residential lot. Site has no street frontage and is accessed by an easement from Pioneer Way N. Property slopes upward from street grade to the west. All utilities are available from Pioneer Way, requiring extension to the property boundary. Comparable 2 is the sale of a 15,682 SF single family residential lot. Rectangular shaped site at street grade. Property was in probate. Transaction included a 1,188 SF double wide mobile home which had nominal contribution value. All utility services are available. Comparable 3 is the sale of a 16,117 SF residential homesite. A 1,304 SF residence built in 1948 contributed no value to the transaction and has since been removed. The site slopes gently upward to the west from street grade. All utilities are available. Comparable 4 is the sale of a 13,939 SF residential lot in a prestigious area of Edmonds. The corner site has excellent westerly views of Puget Sound. Level area for building site with downward slope to the west. All utilities are available. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 25 Packet Pg. 361 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Discussion of Adjustments Unadjusted sale prices range from $240,000 to $1,000,000. In comparison to the subject, the sales have been adjusted for differences in market conditions, location, and a variety of physical characteristics. Certain adjustments will be discussed in additional detail in this section. The first category of adjustments includes market conditions (time), financing, and issues relating to the interests purchased. The subsequent category of adjustments reflects the physical features and locational differences. Rights Conveyed relates to the actual interests transferred. All of the comparable sales include fee simple rights and no adjustments are necessary. Conditions of Sale reflect adjustments for sales, which occurred under unusual and specific conditions. This category is different than the adjustment for time, which will be dealt with subsequently. No adjustment is made for conditions of sale. Financing adjustments are necessary for sales that were financed with atypical terms. This includes seller financing with non -market interest rates or abnormal down payment levels; the theory being that a comparable figure for use in appraisal analysis should reflect a cash equivalent price, or a price that is in line with existing market terms at the time of sale. No adjustments are necessary. In terms of adjustment support for time (market conditions), we have reviewed the market and found that paired sales activity is limited. Average and median sale price trends of residential sales in the 730 Southwest Snohomish County area were analyzed based on data from the Northwest Multiple Listing Service. The monthly sales data is contained in the Addenda. The results summarized below are from January 2019 to January 2022 (most current available). Average Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.10% Median Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.02% The monthly upward trend is relatively similar with an average of 2.06%. The date of sale adjustment is concluded at a conservative 2.0% per month. All the sales are older transactions and adjusted upward for inferior market time. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 26 Packet Pg. 362 9.2.a Physical characteristics, including differences in the location, zoning or land use issues, are now discussed. Market data i quantitative adjustments; therefore, qualitative adjustments ar the chart as follows: SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION e size, intensity of use, and s not adequate to support necessary and reflected in Location: Factors in the location equation include the subject's regional access and proximity to major employment centers and commercial services. The subject property is situated east of downtown Edmonds in a primarily single family neighborhood. Sale 4 is located in an upscale neighborhood and considered to be superior for location. The remaining sales are considered similar to the subject site in location with no adjustment considered necessary. Size: The site size adjustment is based on the larger parcel size of 14,375 SF of land area. Typically, if all other factors are similar, a larger site will sell for more on an overall basis. Sale 1 is smaller and considered inferior on an overall basis for size. The remaining comparable sales are similar in overall size and rated similar. Site Quality: This adjustment considers the topography, shape and sensitive area impact, which combine to affect the overall site utility. Sale 1 is relatively steep with no street frontage and is rated inferior. The remaining sales are considered similar overall for shape, topography and sensitive areas with no adjustment considered necessary. Amenities: This adjustment is made for any perceived amenities, including views, waterfrontage, privacy, and atmosphere of the neighborhood. This also considers nuisances to the property (traffic noise, powerlines, etc.) that can negatively affect value. This can be a very subjective adjustment and is based on the appraiser's opinion of the amenity quality. Sales 1, 2 and 3 have no water view and are rated inferior. Sale 4 is considered similar with no adjustment made. Zoning/Entitlements: This adjustment reflects the differences in zoning and entitlements, as properties with higher density or more intense allowable uses typically sell for higher values. The comparable sales are all zoned for single family development with no adjustment for zoning made. Access/utilities: This adjustment considers visibility, quality of road access, utilities and general infrastructure available at a property. Sale 1 is accessed by easement and requires extension of utilities. Therefore, it is rated inferior. The remaining comparable sales are considered similar to the subject for developed access. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 27 Packet Pg. 363 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Following is a grid summarizing adjustment of the sales as compared to the subject property. Comparable Land Sales Adjustment Summary Sale Date NA 08/20 08/19 08/21 08/20 Sale Price NA $240,000 $310,000 $652,000 $1,000,000 Size - SF 14,375 10,000 15,682 16,117 13,939 Price/SF NA $24.00 $19.77 $40.45 $71.74 Property rights fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple Financing terms NA similar similar similar similar Sale conditions NA similar similar similar similar Market conditions-mos NA 18 30 6 18 Adjustment $86,400 $186,000 $78,240 $360,000 Adjusted sale price $326,400 $496,000 $730,240 $1,360,000 Location Avg similar similar similar superior Site size 14,375 inferior similar similar similar Site quality Avg inferior similar similar similar Amenities Avg inferior inferior inferior similar Zoning/entitlements RS-10 similar similar similar similar Access/utilities Avg inferior similar similar similar Overall Adjustment inferior inferior inferior superior Conclusion of Land Value The comparable sales adequately bracket a market value range for subject land area. Adjusted value range is $326,400 to $1,360,000 after a quantitative adjustment for date of sale. Qualitative adjustments resulted in Sale 4 being superior. The remaining sales are rated inferior to the subject larger parcel. Emphasis is placed on the upper end of the range and Sale 4. Most probable market value of the larger parcel is concluded to be $1,000,000. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 28 Packet Pg. 364 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY PROPERTY VALUATION Site Valuation After Vacation The street vacation is for a 17 foot by 119.9± foot (2,038f SF) strip of an alley right of way adjacent on the east boundary of the subject parent parcel. The subject tract contains 16,413 SF of land area after the street vacation. The additional land area is inadequate to provide an additional building site. The alley vacation strip lies 4 plus feet above the original larger parcel in elevation and contributes limited benefit to physical use of the larger parcel. Primary utility of the alley strip is to contribute a buffer from adjoining development to the east. Highest and best use as if vacant and as improved are unchanged from the before situation. Market data research indicates no measurable difference in residential homesite values based on the nominal size difference of the subject site before and after the street vacation. The before alley vacation value conclusion was $1,000,000 or $69.57/SF. Contribution value of the alley vacation is considered nominal and estimated at 25% of $69.57/SF or $17.39/SF. Contribution value of the 2,038 SF alley vacation strip is concluded to be $35,000 (2,038 SF @ $17.39/SF). Total market value of the subject site after the alley vacation totals $1,035,000. Summary of Site Value Before and After Street Vacation Based on the preceding discussion and in consideration of property rights to be acquired, below is a summary of market value before and after the street vacation. Market Value Before Vacation $1,000,000 Market Value After Vacation $1,035,000 Difference $35,000 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 29 Packet Pg. 365 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This appraisal is subject to the following limiting conditions: 1. The legal description - if furnished to us - is assumed to be correct. 2. No responsibility is assumed for legal matters, questions of survey or title, soil or subsoil conditions, engineering, availability or capacity of utilities, or other similar technical matters. The appraisal does not constitute a survey of the property appraised. All existing liens and encumbrances have been disregarded and the property is appraised as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management unless otherwise noted. 3. Unless otherwise noted, the appraisal will value the property as though free of contamination. ABS Valuation will conduct no hazardous materials or contamination inspection of any kind. It is recommended that the client hire an expert if the presence of hazardous materials or contamination poses any concern. 4. The stamps and/or consideration placed on deeds used to indicate sales are in correct relationship to the actual dollar amount of the transaction. 5. Unless otherwise noted, it is assumed there are no encroachments, zoning violations or restrictions existing in the subject property. 6. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this appraisal unless previous arrangements have been made. 7. Unless expressly specified in the engagement letter, the fee for this appraisal does not include the attendance or giving of testimony by Appraiser at any court, regulatory, or other proceedings, or any conferences or other work in preparation for such proceeding. If any partner or employee of ABS Valuation is asked or required to appear and/or testify at any deposition, trial, or other proceeding about the preparation, conclusions or any other aspect of this assignment, client shall compensate Appraiser for the time spent by the partner or employee in appearing and/or testifying and in preparing to testify according to the Appraiser's then current hourly rate plus reimbursement of expenses. 8. The values for land and/or improvements, as contained in this report, are constituent parts of the total value reported and neither is (or are) to be used in making a summation appraisal of a combination of values created by another appraiser. Either is invalidated if so used. 9. The dates of value to which the opinions expressed in this report apply are set forth in this report. We assume no responsibility for economic or physical factors occurring at some point at a later date, which may affect the opinions stated herein. The forecasts, projections, or operating estimates contained herein are based on current market conditions and anticipated short-term supply and demand factors and are subject to change with future conditions. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 30 Packet Pg. 366 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 10. The sketches, maps, plats and exhibits in this report are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraiser has made no survey of the property and assumed no responsibility in connection with such matters. 11. The information estimates and opinions, which were obtained from sources outside of this office, are considered reliable. However, no liability for them can be assumed by the appraiser. 12. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. Neither all, nor any part of the content of the report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to property value, the identity of the appraisers, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organization or the firm with which the appraisers are connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without prior written consent and approval. 13. No claim is intended to be expressed for matters of expertise that would require specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that ordinarily employed by real estate appraisers. We claim no expertise in areas such as, but not limited to, legal, survey, structural, environmental, pest control, mechanical, etc. 14. This appraisal was prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the client for the function outlined herein. Any party who is not the client or intended user identified in the appraisal or engagement letter is not entitled to rely upon the contents of the appraisal without express written consent of ABS Valuation and Client. The Client shall not include partners, affiliates, or relatives of the party addressed herein. The appraiser assumes no obligation, liability or accountability to any third party. 15. Distribution of this report is at the sole discretion of the client, but third -parties not listed as an intended user on the face of the appraisal or the engagement letter may not rely upon the contents of the appraisal. In no event shall client give a third -party a partial copy of the appraisal report. We will make no distribution of the report without the specific direction of the client. 16. This appraisal shall be used only for the function outlined herein, unless expressly authorized by ABS Valuation. 17. This appraisal shall be considered in its entirety. No part thereof shall be used separately or out of context. 18. Unless otherwise noted in the body of this report, this appraisal assumes that the subject property does not fall within the areas where mandatory flood insurance is effective. Unless otherwise noted, we have not completed, nor have we contracted to have completed an investigation to identify and/or quantify the presence of non -tidal wetland conditions on the subject property. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this determination. 19. The flood maps are not site specific. We are not qualified to confirm the location of the subject property in relation to flood hazard areas based on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or other surveying techniques. It is recommended that the 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 31 Packet Pg. 367 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS client obtain a confirmation of the subject's flood zone classification from a licensed surveyor. 20.If the appraisal is for mortgage loan purposes 1) we assume satisfactory completion of improvements if construction is not complete, 2) no consideration has been given for rent loss during rent -up unless noted in the body of this report, and 3) occupancy at levels consistent with our "Income and Expense Projection" are anticipated. 21.It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures which would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for engineering which may be required to discover them. 22.Our inspection included an observation of the land and improvements thereon only. It was not possible to observe conditions beneath the soil or hidden structural components within the improvements. We inspected the buildings involved, and reported damage (if any) by termites, dry rot, wet rot, or other infestations as a matter of information, and no guarantee of the amount or degree of damage (if any) is implied. Condition of heating, cooling, ventilation, electrical and plumbing equipment is considered to be commensurate with the condition of the balance of the improvements unless otherwise stated. Should the client have concerns in these areas, it is the client's responsibility to order the appropriate inspections. The appraiser does not have the skill or expertise to make such inspections and assumes no responsibility for these items. 23. This appraisal does not guarantee compliance with building code and life safety code requirements of the local jurisdiction. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, certificates of occupancy or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or national governmental or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value conclusion contained in this report is based unless specifically stated to the contrary. 24. When possible, we have relied upon building measurements provided by the client, owner, or associated agents of these parties. In the absence of a detailed rent roll, reliable public records, or "as -built" plans provided to us, we have relied upon our own measurements of the subject improvements. We follow typical appraisal industry methods; however, we recognize that some factors may limit our ability to obtain accurate measurements including, but not limited to, property access on the day of inspection, basements, fenced/gated areas, grade elevations, greenery/shrubbery, uneven surfaces, multiple story structures, obtuse or acute wall angles, immobile obstructions, etc. Professional building area measurements of the quality, level of detail, or accuracy of professional measurement services are beyond the scope of this appraisal assignment. 25. We have attempted to reconcile sources of data discovered or provided during the appraisal process, including assessment department data. Ultimately, the measurements that are deemed by us to be the most accurate and/or reliable are used within this report. While the measurements and any accompanying sketches are considered to be reasonably accurate and reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Should the client desire a greater level of measuring detail, they are urged to retain the measurement services of a qualified professional (space planner, architect or building engineer). We reserve the right to use an alternative source of 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 32 Packet Pg. 368 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS building size and amend the analysis, narrative and concluded values (at additional cost) should this alternative measurement source reflect or reveal substantial differences with the measurements used within the report. 26.In the absence of being provided with a detailed land survey, we have used assessment department data to ascertain the physical dimensions and acreage of the property. Should a survey prove this information to be inaccurate, we reserve the right to amend this appraisal (at additional cost) if substantial differences are discovered. 27.If only preliminary plans and specifications were available for use in the preparation of this appraisal, then this appraisal is subject to a review of the final plans and specifications when available (at additional cost) and we reserve the right to amend this appraisal if substantial differences are discovered. 28. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the value conclusion is predicated on the assumption that the property is free of contamination, environmental impairment or hazardous materials. Unless otherwise stated, the existence of hazardous material was not observed by the appraiser and the appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required for discovery. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 29. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey of the property to determine if it is in conformity with the various requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with an analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this could have a negative effect on the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible noncompliance with the requirements of ADA in developing an opinion of value. 30. This appraisal applies to the land and building improvements only. The value of trade fixtures, furnishings, and other equipment, or subsurface rights (minerals, gas, and oil) were not considered in this appraisal unless specifically stated to the contrary. 31. No changes in any federal, state or local laws, regulations or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated, unless specifically stated to the contrary. 32. Any income and expense estimates contained in the appraisal report are used only for the purpose of estimating value and do not constitute prediction of future operating results. Furthermore, it is inevitable that some assumptions will not materialize and that unanticipated events may occur that will likely affect actual performance. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 33 Packet Pg. 369 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 33. Any estimate of insurable value, if included within the scope of work and presented herein, is based upon figures developed consistent with industry practices. However, actual local and regional construction costs may vary significantly from our estimate and individual insurance policies and underwriters have varied specifications, exclusions, and non -insurable items. As such, we strongly recommend that the Client obtain estimates from professionals experienced in establishing insurance coverage. This analysis should not be relied upon to determine insurance coverage and we make no warranties regarding the accuracy of this estimate. 34. The data gathered in the course of this assignment (except data furnished by the Client) shall remain the property of the Appraiser. The appraiser will not violate the confidential nature of the appraiser -client relationship by improperly disclosing any confidential information furnished to the appraiser. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Appraiser is authorized by the client to disclose all or any portion of the appraisal and related appraisal data to appropriate representatives of the Appraisal Institute if such disclosure is required to enable the appraiser to comply with the Bylaws and Regulations of such Institute now or hereafter in effect. 35. You and ABS Valuation both agree that any dispute over matters in excess of $5,000 will be submitted for resolution by arbitration. This includes fee disputes and any claim of malpractice. The arbitrator shall be mutually selected. If ABS Valuation and the client cannot agree on the arbitrator, the presiding head of the Local County Mediation & Arbitration panel shall select the arbitrator. Such arbitration shall be binding and final. In agreeing to arbitration, we both acknowledge that, by agreeing to binding arbitration, each of us is giving up the right to have the dispute decided in a court of law before a judge or jury. In the event that the client, or any other party, makes a claim against ABS Valuation or any of its employees in connections with or in any way relating to this assignment, the maximum damages recoverable by such claimant shall be the amount actually received by ABS Valuation for this assignment, and under no circumstances shall any claim for consequential damages be made. 36. ABS Valuation shall have no obligation, liability, or accountability to any third party. Any party who is not the "client" or intended user identified on the face of the appraisal or in the engagement letter is not entitled to rely upon the contents of the appraisal without the express written consent of ABS Valuation. 'Client" shall not include partners, affiliates, or relatives of the party named in the engagement letter. Client shall hold ABS Valuation and its employees harmless in the event of any lawsuit brought by any third party, lender, partner, or part-owner in any form of ownership or any other party as a result of this assignment. The client also agrees that in case of lawsuit arising from or in any way involving these appraisal services, client will hold ABS Valuation harmless from and against any liability, loss, cost, or expense incurred or suffered by ABS Valuation in such action, regardless of its outcome. 37. Acceptance and/or use of this appraisal report constitutes acceptance of the foregoing general assumptions and limiting conditions. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 34 Packet Pg. 370 SCUDDER PROPERTY CERTIFICATION Certification I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: • the statements of fact contained in this report and upon which the opinions herein are based are true and correct • the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions • I have no interest, either present or prospective in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. • I have no bias with respect to the subject property, or to the parties involved. • My engagement in this assignment was in no way contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results, nor was it based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific value, or the approval of a loan • My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal • My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed in conformity with requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Regulations for Federally Assisted Programs (The Uniform Act) . • I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. • I have made a personal inspection of the subject property, and the owner or owner's representative was given the opportunity to accompany the appraiser on the property inspection • No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification, with the exception of the person(s) shown on additional certification(s), if enclosed. • This report was prepared in compliance with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute • Use of this report is subject to the Appraisal Institute's right to review the appraisal report • As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute for Designated Members • In my opinion, the market value of the subject property is: Market Value Before Vacation $1,000,000 Market Value After Vacation $1,035,000 Difference $35,000 Date of Value: March 7, 2022 Robert J. Macaulay, MAI WA State Certified- General Appraiser No. 1100517 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 35 Packet Pg. 371 SCUDDER PROPERTY CERTIFICATION Certification I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: • the statements of fact contained in this report and upon which the opinions herein are based are true and correct • the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions • I have no interest, either present or prospective in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. • I have no bias with respect to the subject property, or to the parties involved. • My engagement in this assignment was in no way contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results, nor was it based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific value, or the approval of a loan • My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal • My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed in conformity with requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Regulations for Federally Assisted Programs (The Uniform Act) . • I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. • I have made a personal inspection of the subject property, and the owner or owner's representative was given the opportunity to accompany the appraiser on the property inspection • No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification, with the exception of the person(s) shown on additional certification(s), if enclosed. • This report was prepared in compliance with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute • Use of this report is subject to the Appraisal Institute's right to review the appraisal report • As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute for Practicing Affiliates • In my opinion, the market value of the subject property is: Market Value Before Vacation $1,000,000 Market Value After Vacation $1,035,000 Difference $35,000 Date of Value: March 7, 2022 � 7, d4, _/ Jim E. Dodge, Senior Associate Appraiser WA State Certified- General Appraiser No. 1100557 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 36 Packet Pg. 372 SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Addenda Comparable Property Information NWMLS Market Trend Data Zoning Map Qualifications 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Page 37 Packet Pg. 373 Comparable Property Information Puget' b Y C 33ppm .31 THE BOWL. OF EDMONOS is Kingston �� Brackelt's rt Landing North C3 � Edmonds Main s� Daylan 131 R Walnut St rina Edrnond5 p h Pa�c City Park I PINE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD 2201h St $W 10S � a K y�r k k ood a C Pee Community Markets - Edmonds 0 _2 J � 1 5 SHERWOOD FOREST Comparable Land Sales Map 9 $GWdOiA IvaY 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA City Municip 2121h St SW Wi D 15 Esperance 228th Sk sw 10S WhirlyBall� Safeawa 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 374 LAND SALE NO. 1 21222 Pioneer Wy N Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 21222 Pioneer Wy'N 10993599 Residential (Single -Family) Single family lot 21222 Pioneer Way N Edmonds, Washington 980 Snohomish Westerly of Pioneer Way, 003736-005-005-04 47.807179 - 122.352712 Mariah Sebastien Oregon Excellence, LLC 08-12-2020 08-14-2020 $240,000 $240,000 Statutory Warranty Deed 202008140728 Fee Simple 13 days Jim Dodge Chris Pollock, agent 03-02-2022 Land 26 north of Shell Valley Rd. 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 375 9.2.a Land Data Land Size Topography Front Footage Utilities Access Shape Grade Access In Flood Plain? Zoning Code SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 0.23 acres or 10,019 SF Sloping None All available Easement to Pioneer Way N. Irregular At or above street grade Easement to Pioneer Way N. No RS-8, Single Family 8,000 SF Lots, City of Edmonds Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $1,043,478 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $23.95 per SF Property Remarks Sale of a 0.23 acre (10,019 SF) single family residential lot. Site has no street frontage and is accessed by an easement from Pioneer Way N. Property slopes upward from street grade to the west. Comp ID No. 10993599 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 376 LAND SALE NO. 2 22521 82nd AV W Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Section, Township, Range Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 22521 82nd Av W 10993600 Residential (Single -Family) Land Single Family lot 22521 82nd Ave W Edmonds, Washington 98026 Snohomish East side of 82nd Ave W, 72f feet north of 226th St SW 30-27-4 004914-001-003-01 47.794500 - 122.343152 Estate of Timothy Gritten Timofey Karpenko 08-16-2019 08-21-2019 $310,000 $310,000 Statutory Warranty Deed 201908210281 Fee Simple 62 days Jim Dodge Michael Thornes, agent 03-02-2022 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 377 9.2.a Land Data Land Size Topography Front Footage Depth (Feet) Utilities Access Shape Grade Access In Flood Plain? Zoning Code 0.36 acres or 15,682 SF Mostly level 100.00 feet on two lane 158.00 All available 82nd Ave W Generally Rectangular At street grade 82nd Ave W No SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA paved public street R8400, Residential 1 DU/8,400 SF, Snohomish County Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $861,111 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $19.77 per SF Analysis Price/Front Foot $3,100.00 Property Remarks Sale of a 15,682 SF single family residential lot. Rectangular shaped site at street grade. Property was in probate. Transaction included a 1,188 SF double wide mobile home which had nominal contribution value. Comp ID No. 10993600 v 0 0 N N O N Z J d c 0 r M U a a� r L �0 CD c m x Q a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 378 LAND SALE NO. 3 22328 88th Av W Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Section, Township, Range Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 22328 88th AV W 10993601 Residential (Single -Family) Land Single family lot 22328 88th Ave W Edmonds, Washington 98026 Snohomish Northwest corner of 88th Ave W 30-27-4 004610-007-001-02 47.796206 - 122.352327 Estate of Miriamdale Doyle Christopher & Brandon Melton 08-13-2021 08-19-2021 $652,000 $652,000 Bargain and Sale Deed 202108190671 Fee Simple 9 days Jim Dodge Dan Willner, agent 03-02-2022 and 224th St SW. 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 379 9.2.a Land Data Land Size Topography Front Footage Utilities Access Shape Grade Access In Flood Plain? Zoning Code SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 0.37 acres or 16,117 SF Mostly level 125.00 feet on 88th Ave W All available 88th Ave W Mostly Square At or above street grade 88th Ave W No R8400, Residential 1 DU/8,400 SF, Snohomish County Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $1,762,162 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $40.45 per SF Analysis Price/Front Foot $5,216.00 Property Remarks Sale of a 16,117 SF residential homesite. A 1,304 SF residence built in 1948 contributed no value to the transaction and has since been removed. Comp ID No. 10993601 v 0 0 N N 0 N Z J d c 0 r M U a a� r L 0 CD c m x a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 380 LAND SALE NO. 4 131 Skyline Dr Property Identification Property ID Property Type Property Name Address City, State Zip County Location Description Section, Township, Range Tax ID Latitude and Longitude Sale Data Seller Buyer Sale Date Recording Date Sale Price Analysis Price Deed Type Recording No. Property Rights Transferred Market Time Verified By Verification With Verification Date SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 131 Skyline Dr 10993602 Residential (Single -Family) Land Residential site 131 Skyline Dr Edmonds, Washington 98020 Snohomish Skyline Dr., 250f feet north of Main Street. 24-27-3 004230-000-053-00 47.811415 - 122.357113 Susannah Johnston Sue & Gerald King 08-20-2020 08-18-2020 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Statutory Warranty Deed 202008180370 Fee Simple 3 days Jim Dodge Terry Vehrs, agent 03-02-2022 9.2.a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 381 9.2.a Land Data Land Size Topography Front Footage Utilities Access Shape Grade Access In Flood Plain? Zoning Code SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA 0.32 acres or 13,939 SF Sloping 93.00 feet on Skyline Dr. All available Skyline Drive Irregular At or below street grade Skyline Drive No RS12, Single Family 12,000 SF Lots, City of Edmonds Indicators Analysis Price/Gross Acre $3,125,000 per Acre Analysis Price/Gross SF $71.74 per SF Analysis Price/Front Foot $10,752.69 Property Remarks Sale of a 13,939 SF residential lot in prestigious area of Edmonds. Site has excellent westerly view of Puget Sound. Level area for building site with downward slope to the west. Comp ID No. 10993602 uO v 0 0 N N O N Z J d c 0 r m a� r U) L 0 a� c m x 3 a 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 382 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA NWMLS Market Trend Data Monthly Average Sale Price -Residential Area 730 Month 2019 2020 2021 2022 Jan $543,051 $628,297 $769,638 $965,155 Feb $615,329 $681,139 $857,260 Mar $614,136 $648,330 $816,787 Apr $617,005 $651,850 $840,410 May $629,066 $650,418 $856,550 Jun $674,838 $637,817 $895,065 Jul $626,628 $722,878 $843,363 Aug $627,955 $739,830 $886,415 Sep $623,357 $704,374 $826,058 Oct $647,327 $706,595 $890,949 Nov $602,137 $716,284 $874,254 Dec $620,549 $754,348 $942,803 Monthly Median Sale Price -Residential Area 730 Month 2019 2020 2021 2022 Jan $492,998 $575,000 $712,500 $861,000 Feb $525,000 $620,750 $750,000 Mar $542,500 $610,000 $780,500 Apr $555,000 $603,000 $775,000 May $558,750 $585,000 $825,000 Jun $596,500 $580,000 $850,000 Jul $578,250 $660,000 $780,000 Aug $553,800 $640,000 $791,250 Sep $567,500 $675,000 $780,500 Oct $568,250 $650,000 $805,000 Nov $554,000 $660,000 $815,000 Dec $559 950 $685 500 $861 865 Average Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.10% Median Sale Price 1/2019 - 1/2022 2.02% 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 383 ABS VALUATION SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Qualifications of Appraisers 9.2.a Q 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 385 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Qualifications of Robert J. Macaulay, MAI ABS Valuation Education Bachelor of Arts in Economics, Washington State University, 1983. Professional Education Appraisal Courses: All appraisal courses required for MAI designation. Seminars and Continuing Education (abbreviated summary of coursework): • Environmental & Property Dangers • UASFLA Seminar (Yellow Book) • Introduction to Valuation for Financial Reporting • Eminent Domain and Condemnation • Evaluating Commercial Construction • The Road Less Traveled: Special Purpose Properties • The Appraiser as Expert Witness • Litigation Appraising: Specialized Topics and Applications • Appraiser Consulting: A Solutions Approach for Professionals • Subdivision Valuation Professional Affiliation Member, Appraisal Institute. Received MAI Designation in 1995. (Member No. 10,712) Approved Appraiser and Review Appraiser, Washington State Department of Transportation Member, International Right -of -Way Association Past Board of Trustees - Washington Center for Real Estate Research Appraisal Experience Principal with Macaulay & Associates. Appraisal assignments include a wide variety of commercial, industrial and residential properties for financial institutions, governmental entities, law firms, corporations and private individuals. Examples include medical and non- medical related office buildings, retail shopping centers, multifamily properties, industrial warehouses, restaurants, retail stores, mobile home parks, service stations, single-family subdivisions and special purpose properties. Other valuation assignments cover rental valuations, partial interest studies (leasehold/leased fee estates), waterfront commercial and industrial properties for various port authorities, together with remote large acreage agricultural and forest land. One of Mr. Macaulay's specialties in which he has extensive knowledge and over 25 years of experience with is Local improvement district (LID) special benefit and feasibility study analysis. Robert's (LID) special benefit and feasibility study experience includes a variety of road improvement, utility and other infrastructure projects. The firm's extensive experience with these projects dates back to 1975. Right-of-way projects include easement analysis for the United States Navy and analysis of 70+ parcels for the City of Renton for acquisition and easement purposes. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 386 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI (cont.) Numerous appraisals were also prepared for a large trunk water line easement extending under the Snohomish River to the Tulalip Tribes and City of Marysville for the City of Everett. Similar to right-of-way work, special benefit and economic feasibility studies have been completed for the cities of Marysville, Vancouver, Bellevue, Burien, Ferndale, Freeland, Kent, Lynnwood, Ocean Shores, and Yelm (2006 to 2015). Consultation work on a road improvement district (RID) project for unincorporated Clallam County was performed in 2010. Other current or recently completed projects (2010-2014) include special benefit and feasibility studies for the cities of Bellevue, Edgewood, Freeland, Lynnwood and Tacoma. In addition to over 30 other feasibility and special benefit studies completed. A wide variety of multi -parcel right-of-way acquisition appraisals have been completed, such as riverbank protection easements for the City of Tukwila, right-of-way acquisition for road widening for the City of Bellingham and utility line easements, road widening and other public improvement projects for the City of Everett. A large right-of-way project for the Montana Department of Highways near Kalispell, Montana was completed several years ago. Also, eminent domain appraisals have been completed for the Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation (WSDOT) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad in Wenatchee and Tacoma. Other special purpose assignments are 6,000 acres on the Tulalip Indian Reservation for the Tulalip Tribes, 80 acres on Burrows Island in Skagit County, 900 acres in Skagit County for Skagit County Parks and Recreation Department, and the Eagle Harbor ferry maintenance site on Bainbridge Island for WSDOT. Various reports on mineral rights have been completed, including an 80-acre operating quarry in Bremerton, WA. Testified in various cases in King, Snohomish and Skagit counties, together with presentations at LID hearings on preliminary and final assessment rolls. Qualified as expert witness in the states of Washington and Montana. Other Experience Mr. Macaulay has been involved with MRSC dating back to the late 1990's and involves published (and updated) information on their website pertaining to local improvement district (LID) special benefit analysis, methodology and proportionality issues for a wide range of LID projects such as freeway interchange/arterial road improvements, utility (large sewer/water installation) infrastructure, slope stabilization, bridge improvements and other related publicly funded development. Numerous presentations have been made around the state for MRSC involving LID analysis examples completed for various cities and utility districts. Conferences have been made touching upon a wide variety of special benefit analysis issues relating to a wide variety of LID projects ranging from $500,000 to over 100 million in project cost. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 387 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA ROBERT J. MACAULAY, MAI (cont.) Representative Client List Cities/Counties Cities of Aberdeen, Arlington, Bellevue, Bellingham, Blaine, Bothell, Burlington, Edgewood, Edmonds, Everett, Ferndale, Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland, Lacey, Lake Forest Park, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Marysville, Mount Vernon, Mukilteo, Oak Harbor, Ocean Shores, Pacific, Port Townsend, Redmond, Renton, Seattle, Shoreline, Stanwood, Sultan, Tacoma, Vancouver, Wenatchee and Washougal. Counties of Clark, Clallam, Douglas, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, Thurston and Whatcom. Government Ports of Anacortes, Edmonds, Everett, Seattle and Skagit County. Edmonds, Everett, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Monroe, Mukilteo, Marysville and Snohomish School Districts. Washington State Parks, WSDOT (Approved Appraiser/Reviewer Lists), DNR, WA State Attorney General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Navy, Everett Parks Foundation, Seattle DOT, University of Washington, Department of Interior, Snohomish County PUD, Skagit County PUD, Montana Department of Highways, Financial Institutions Anchor Bank, Bank of Washington, Banner Bank, Community Bank, Columbia Bank, Commerce Bank, International Bank, Heritage Bank, Homestreet Bank, Pacific Coast Bank, Opus Bank, Prime Pacific Bank, Fargo. Corporations, Law Firms and Non Profits BECU, China Trust Bank, Coastal First Savings Bank Northwest, GBC Key Bank, Mountain Pacific Bank, One Peoples Bank, US Bancorp and Wells Weyerhaeuser Company, Puget Sound Energy, SCA Engineering, Entranco Engineering, The Trust for Public Land, OTAK, HDR, Inc., The Boeing Company, Coates Field Service, Inc., Perteet Engineering, Gray & Osborne, Inc., Tetra Tech, Steven J. Fields, Brewe Layman, Weed, Graafstra & Benson, Inc., P.S., Anderson Hunter, Foster Pepper, Burgess, Fitzer, Leighton & Phillips, Inslee, Best & Dozier, Preston, Gates & Ellis. State Certification Number - General: 1100517 Expiration: 10/10/23 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 388 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA Qualifications of Jim E. Dodge Senior Associate Appraiser ABS Valuation Education Bachelor of Science in Business Management, University of Idaho, 1977. Professional Education Appraisal Courses: Standards of Professional Practice SPP- Part C, Standards of Professional Practice SPP- Part B. Report Writing and Valuation Analysis, Case Studies 2-1, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, Module A, Capitalization Theory & Techniques, Parts 1BA & 1BB, Basic Valuation Procedures 1A2, Real Estate Appraisal Principles 1A1 Seminars and Continuing Education (abbreviated summary of coursework): • Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) • IRWA: 403-Easement Valuation • IRWA: 802 - Legal Aspects of Easements • AI: Business Practice & Ethics, Agricultural Special Use • AI: Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book) • AI: Easements & Divided Partial Interests, Errors & Misconceptions in Yellow Book • AI: USPAP, Evaluating Commercial Construction, Business Practices & Ethics • AI: Attacking/Defending Appraisals in Litigation, Fall Real Estate Conference • AI: Real Estate Finance, Statistics & Valuation Modeling, Course 300 • AI: Eminent Domain & Condemnation, Conservation Easements, Analyzing Distressed Properties • Appraisal Review Overview (WSDOT) • AI: Partial Interest Valuation • AI: Condemnation Appraising - Basic Principles, 710 Professional Affiliation Practicing Affiliate, Appraisal Institute. Approved Appraiser and Review Appraiser, Washington State Department of Transportation Member, International Right -of -Way Association Appraisal Experience Assignments have included fee and ad valorem appraisals of commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural and special use properties. Qualified as an expert witness in Snohomish County and Island County Superior Courts. Presentations at LID/LUD preliminary and final assessment roll hearings. Ad Valorem appraisal contracts completed for several northern Idaho counties. Tasks included field inspections, analysis of market data, agricultural production income/costs, depreciation studies and board of equalization. 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 389 9.2.a SCUDDER PROPERTY ADDENDA JIM DODGE (cont.) A variety of right-of-way acquisition appraisals have been completed, typically involving multiple parcel assignments. Projects include trail acquisition for the Snohomish County Parks Department and the Skagit County Parks Department. Right-of-way acquisition for road widening purposes have been completed for Snohomish and Skagit County Public Works departments and the cities of Marysville, Snohomish, Stanwood, Lake Stevens and Everett. A highway right-of-way acquisition project for the Montana Department of Highways involved approximately 100 properties. Eminent domain appraisals have been completed for the Washington State Department of Transportation. Currently on the WSDOT approved list for fee and review appraisers. Valuation assignments completed cover a wide variety of commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural and special use properties in addition to real estate consultations with private individuals and organizations. LID Special Benefit Study experience includes the 1,400 acre Northwest Landing development by Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company at DuPont, WA, City of Ocean Shores sewer LID 98-01 and various studies for Snohomish County PUD No. 1 and Skagit County PUD No. 1. Representative Client List Cities/Counties Cities of Arlington, Bellingham, Burlington, Edmonds, Everett, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Marysville, Monroe, Mountlake Terrace, Mount Vernon, Mukilteo, Oak Harbor, Ocean Shores, Renton, Seattle, Snohomish, Stanwood, Sultan, and Woodinville. Counties of Island, King, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, and Whatcom. Government Ports of Everett and Skagit County. Edmonds, Everett, Granite Falls, Mukilteo, Marysville and Stanwood School Districts. WSDOT, U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command NW, Seattle City Light, Snohomish County PUD, Skagit County PUD, Tulalip Tribes, Lummi Indian Nation and Montana Department of Highways. Financial Institutions Bank of Washington, BECU, Everett Mutual Bank, Farm Credit Services, First Heritage Bank, First Interstate Bank, Frontier Savings Bank, Seafirst National Bank, The Commerce Bank and US Bancorp. Corporations, Law Firms and Non -Profits Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, Puget Sound Energy, OTAK, HDR Inc., Coates Field Service, Inc., Perteet Engineering, Brewe Layman, Weed, Graafstra & Benson, Inc., P.S., Anderson Hunter, Hill Street Development, Industrial Electric, Les Schwab, Millstone, Northcoast Electric, Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Providence Hospital, Steel Fab and Tyr Energy. State Certification Number - General: 1100557 Expiration: 9/3/23 22-0029 - Scudder Property © 2022 ABS Valuation Packet Pg. 390 9.2.a From: Warrick, John To: McConnell, Jeanie Cc: Szafran, Michele Subject: RE: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Date: Thursday, August 4, 2022 6:42:15 AM Attachments: imaae002.Dna image003.pnno (Comcast) 836 Fir St, Edmonds.Dna Good Morning Jeanie, Looks like we are with the PUD aerial on the North side of Fir St. so you are correct we do not have any facilities on that section of ROW, I have attached a print. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks John Warrick 4? 1AT Construction, Planning & Design 0: 425.263-5328 1 C: 425.757-1794 From: McConnell, Jeanie<Jeanie.McConnell @edmondswa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 6:58 PM To: Warrick, John<John_Warrick@cable.comcast.com> Cc: Szafran, Michele <Michele.Szafran@edmondswa.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Good evening John, The City of Edmonds is in the process of reviewing a street vacation application for a segment of unopened ROW adjacent to 838 Fir Street, location shown below and in the attached survey. ATTACHMEq Packet Pg. 391 9.2.a 809 1062M 010 AN I am reaching out to you as I'm not sure who to send this to at Comcast for review and comment. I appreciate your help forwarding this request as needed. We would like to confirm that Comcast does not have any facilities within this section of ROW and request any comments you may have by August 26th Thanks much! Jeanie Jeanie McConnell I Engineering Program Manager City of Edmonds 425-771-0220, ext 1338 425-754-5327 cell ieanie.mcconnellPedmondswa.gov The Development Services Permit Center is open M-F 8:00om to 4:30pm for Telephone and Digital/Remote access. In -Person walk-in service is currently available M-F 10:00am to 2:00pm: appointments are encouraged. For general service: Phone 425.771.0220 Email engineeringpermits(@edmondswa.(Zov uF v 0 0 N N O N Z J d C O r v cc m r U) L O a) c �L cc am x U a Packet Pg. 392 9.2.a From: Robinson, Patrick To: McConnell, Jeanie Cc: Sidick, Susan; Szafran, Michele Subject: RE: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Date: Thursday, August 4, 2022 3:32:02 PM Hi Jeanie, Thank you for reaching out on the subject. Looking at our facilities in the area we don't seem to have anything in the proposed ROW. I ran this past our Real Estate team and they concur and have provided the following comments: Service is limited to gas. There is a gas main along Fir St (public R/W) to the north. The two parcels on each side of the unopened ROW are currently served directly from the main on Fir St. We do not need an easement within the proposed vacation area to continue serving both parcels. Thanks again. Regards, Patrick Robinson Municipal Liaison Manager Municipal Relations North PUGET SOUND ENERGY 425-424-7498 1 (89-7498) 19900 N. Creek Parkway, Bldg G, Bothell, WA 98011 From: Sidick, Susan <Susan.Sidick@pse.com> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 7:16 AM To: Robinson, Patrick <Patrick.Robinson@pse.com> Subject: FW: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Importance: High Hi Patrick do you know which dept would do these walking surveys is it the maintance group? Is it the MLM group? Susan Sidick 1660 Park Lane Burlington Wa 98233 425-457-6353 SR Permit Specialist From: McConnell, Jeanie<Jeanie.McConnell(@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 7:00 PM To: Sidick, Susan <Susan.Sidickftse.com> Cc: Szafran, Michele <Michele.SzafranCcDedmondswa.gov> Subject: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Packet Pg. 393 9.2.a Good evening Sue, The City of Edmonds is in the process of reviewing a street vacation application for a segment of unopened ROW adjacent to 838 Fir Street, location shown below and in the attached survey. I am reaching out you as I'm not sure who to send this to at PSE for review and comment. I appreciate your help forwarding this request as needed. We would like to confirm that PSE does not have any facilities within this section of ROW and request any comments you may have by August 26th Thanks much! Jeanie Jeanie McConnell I Engineering Program Manager City of Edmonds 425-771-0220, ext 1338 425-754-5327 cell ieanie.mcconnell(@edmondswa.gov The Development Services Permit Center is open M-F 8:00om to 4:30pm for Telephone and Digital/Remote access. In -Person walk-in service is currently available M-F 10:00om to 2:00am,• appointments are encouraged. For general service: Phone 425.771.0220 Email engineeringgermits(@edmondswa.gov Packet Pg. 394 9.2.a i v 0 0 N N O N Z J d C O r R v R d O L vJ L O CD �L d :i Q_ Q 06 L O Q R v/ LO O N N O N Z J d r C d t V R r.+ Q Packet Pg. 395 9.2.a From: Dumo, Richard To: McConnell, Jeanie; HaysliD. Gordon Cc: Szafran, Michele; Burke, Erin; Flaherty, Andra Subject: RE: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Date: Thursday, August 4, 2022 6:21:42 AM Attachments: imaae002.Dna image003.pnng imaae004.Dna Hello Jeanie, Our map does not indicate any presence of PUD equipment on that area of unopened ROW (see below). The closest electrical equipment is a secondary pedestal serving "838" and it appears to have been installed inside the private property back in 2005. I hope this helps and let me know if you have any other questions. Map: Old record: 827 2-101 1-170cn . 3 15-7755 1054 > SL-1368-0 SL-3946-0 Q 15-8695 2-98 2-5003 CII \F 65 1-168 O i2G 3 25-1958 1108 404 L-22675-0 SHEET OF 5 1 W 0 V Iq 0 0 N N 0 N Z J IL c cc V M m d L L IM S L M 4) a Packet Pg. 396 9.2.a Have a good day Jeanie. Richard Dumo Distribution Engineering Services 1802 75th St. SW, Everett, WA 98206 Office: 425-783-5110 From: McConnell, Jeanie<Jeanie.McConnell @edmondswa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 6:36 PM To: Dumo, Richard <RSDumo@SNOPUD.com>; Hayslip, Gordon <GWHayslip@SNOPUD.com> Cc: Szafran, Michele <Michele.Szafran@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street CAUTION: THIS EMAIL IS FROM AN EXTERNAL SENDER. Do not click on links or open attachments if the sender is unknown or the email is suspect. Good evening, The City of Edmonds is in the process of reviewing a street vacation application for a segment of unopened ROW adjacent to 838 Fir Street, location shown below and in the attached survey. o� 54 E809 i062M ■1�FIR ST I am reaching out to both of you as I'm not sure who to send this to at PUD for review and comment. I appreciate your help forwarding this request as needed. We would like to confirm that PUD does not have any facilities within this section of ROW and request any comments you may have by August 26th Thanks much! Jeanie Packet Pg. 397 9.2.a Jeanie McConnell I Engineering Program Manager City of Edmonds 425-771-0220, ext 1338 425-754-5327 cell ieanie.mcconnell(@edmondswa.gov The Development Services Permit Center is open M-F 8:00am to 4:30pm for Telephone and Digital/Remote access. In -Person walk-in service is currently available M-F 10:00am to 2:00pm,: appointments are encouraged. For general service: Phone 425.771.0220 Email engineeringpermitsCcDedmondswa.goy Packet Pg. 398 9.2.a From: Hakahan, Mike To: McConnell, Jeanie; Szafran, Michele Cc: Diaz, Adam; Nance, Rob Subject: RE: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Date: Friday, August 19, 2022 11:50:16 AM Attachments: image001.Dna imaae002.pna imaae003.pna imaae004.pna Survev.odf Zioly 7PFAOAR for 838 Fir St. Edmonds.pdf Hi Jeanie and Michele, The attached record shows we have a 1.25" conduit road bore from the pole heading south across the street, and then travelling across this ROW section you described, and stopping at the small green "flower pot" to serve 838 Fir St. Below are some approximations of this 1.25" conduit. Excavation in the field would find it to be orange in color and likely with a think black stripe along the length. Packet Pg. 399 9.2.a Our current records show that residence 838 Fir St is not currently working, so they are probably a Comcast customer. Even if there is a Ziply Fiber service drop inside the conduit that feeds the residence, we can make a fast and easy response to get the conduit out of your way. The fiber service drop can be disconnected at the top of the pole, pulled through the conduit, and coiled on the ground near the flower pot at the house. Then we could cut and reconnect the empty 1.25" conduit if it might be in your way. Once the conduit is restored we would then put the fiber service drop back through the conduit and reconnect it at the pole. By the way, I also noticed the PUD power service cable follows this same route, as we can see their vault even closer to the driveway for 838 Fir St. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, i v 0 0 N N O N Z J a 0 M U) L O �L d :i Packet Pg. 400 9.2.a Mike HaKahan, Ziply OSP Engineer 425-949-0230 mike.hakahan(@ziply.com From: Nance, Rob <robert.nance@ziply.com> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 11:31 AM To: McConnell, Jeanie <Jeanie.McConnell @edmondswa.gov>; Hakahan, Mike <mike.hakahan@ziply.com>; Diaz, Adam <adam.diaz@ziply.com> Cc: Szafran, Michele <Michele.Szafran@edmondswa.gov> Subject: RE: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street Mike, Sorry for the delay in handing this off to you. Can you please review quickly and provide feedback to City of Edmonds on the street vacation? It needs to be committed by 8/26/22. From: McConnell, Jeanie <Jeanie. McConnell Co)edmondswa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 6:55 PM To: Nance, Rob <robert.nance(@ziply.com> Cc: Szafran, Michele<Michele.Szafran(d)edmondswa.gov> Subject: Proposed Street Vacation - 838 Fir Street WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links. Good evening Rob, The City of Edmonds is in the process of reviewing a street vacation application for a segment of unopened ROW adjacent to 838 Fir Street, location shown below and in the attached survey. Packet Pg. 401 9.2.a 111a r W 0) 1 I.S.; ! � 113 A ■ I am reaching out to you as I'm not sure who to send this to at Ziply for review and comment. I appreciate your help forwarding this request as needed. We would like to confirm that Ziply does not have any facilities within this section of ROW and request any comments you may have by August 26th Thanks much! Jeanie Jeanie McConnell I Engineering Program Manager City of Edmonds 425-771-0220, ext 1338 425-754-5327 cell ieanie.mcconnell(@edmondswa.gov The Development Services Permit Center is open M-F 8:00om to 4:30pm for Telephone and Digital/Remote access. In -Person walk-in service is currently available M-F 10:00am to 2:00am: appointments are encouraged. For general service: Phone 425.771.0220 Email engineeringgermitsla)edmondswo.gov i v 0 0 N N O N Z J d C O r cc m r U) L O a� c �L cc m x a Packet Pg. 402 9.2.a RESOLUTION NO. 1501 A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SETTING A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF AN UNOPENED ALLEY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY ADDRESSED AT 838 FIR STREET. WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.050 authorizes a street vacation process to be initiated by the petition of the owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has received a petition from all of the property owners abutting the unopened alley adjacent to the property addressed at 838 Fir Street; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.070 requires the city council to fix a time by resolution for public hearing on any proposed street vacation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.070 requires that such hearing occur no less than twenty days and no more than sixty days after the passage of the resolution fixing the hearing date; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington as follows: Section 1. A public hearing on the proposed street vacation shall be scheduled for September 20, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. before the Edmonds City Council. Section 2. The city clerk shall provide notice of the public hearing as required pursuant to RCW 35.79.020 and ECDC 20.70.090 to the extent that such notice requirements are applicable. RESOLVED this 2nd day of August, 2022. APPROVED: r MgdR, MIKE NELSON ATTESTIAUTHE CATED: CITY CLERK, SC ASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: July 29, 2022 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: August 2, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 1501 1 ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 403 9.2.a ` PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 during the regularly scheduled city Council Meeting the Edmonds City Council will hold a public hearing regarding the following issue: CONSIDERATION OF THE VACATION OF THAT PORTION OF AN UNOPENED ALLEY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTIES ADDRESSED AT 838 FIR STREET AND 1108 9T" AVE. SOUTH. NO EASEMENTS WILL BE RETAINED WITHIN THE ALLEY. FILE NO. PLN2022-0045. The meeting will be held in the Council Chamber of Edmonds Public Safety Complex, 250 5th Avenue N., Edmonds, Washington. Council meetings are scheduled to start at 7:00 p.m. unless otherwise noticed. All interested persons are encouraged to attend and provide oral and/or written comments. Meeting attendance is also possible via the Zoom Platform. Citizens may connect using a computer or smart phone at: https:Hzoom.us/m/95798484261 or join the meeting by phone at: US: +1 253 215 8782 Webinar ID: 957 9848 4261. Written comments are welcome prior to the public hearing, https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment. Additional information may be obtained from: Development Services Dept. 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 las Falk for Scott M. Passey, MMC Edmonds City Clerk Published: August 31, 2022 Posted: August 30, 2022 Vicinity Map WARNING! THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE OF THE MEETING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER September 20, 2022. Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771-2525 with 24 hours advance notice for special accommodations. ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 404 9.2.a FILE NO.: PLN2022-0045 DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 30th day of August, 2022, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at the subject property in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.70.090, City Hall and the Public Safety Complex in accordance with ECC 1.03.020. The library was not posted as the public notice area is cordoned off due to closure for remodeling. I, Michele Q. Szafran, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 30t" day of August, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: IBFP747893.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 405 9.2.a FILE NO.: PLN2022-0045 Applicant: CONSIDERATION OF THE VACATION OF THAT PORTION OF AN UNOPENED ALLEY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTIES ADDRESSED AT 838 FIR STREET AND 1108 9Tx AVE. SOUTH. NO EASEMENTS WILL BE RETAINED WITHIN THE ALLEY. DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 30th day of August, 2022, the attached Notice of Public Hearing notification was mailed to the City of Edmonds to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. The adjacent property owners list was provided by the applicant. I, Michelle Martin, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 301h day of August, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: X"e&e Xatia {BFP747887.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 406 9.2.a From: Ken Reidv To: Council; Peterson, Beckie Cc: Nelson, Michael; Taraday, Jeff; Planning; Citizens Planning Board; Szafran, Michele; Engineering; McLaughlin, Susan Subject: Street vacation discussed in next week"s City Council Packet Date: Sunday, July 31, 2022 9:44:05 AM Attachments: Ouit Claim Deed before Street Vacation.pdf 270325-2.odf Resolution 1145.ndf Dear City Council (others blind cc'd), There is an interesting street vacation discussed in the August 2, 2022, City Council Packet. The vacation of a 17-foot-wide easement has been petitioned for. I've never seen a 17' wide city easement for a public alley. Right-of-way easements that can be improved and opened for use as a public alley are typically 15' wide. I also see no discussion of whether the fee title to the property burdened by the easement is owned 100% by just one of the abutting property owners or both abutting property owners, one-half to each. The general rule is that abutting property owners own the fee title to the center of the street or alley. RCW 35.79.040 provides: If any street or alley in any city or town is vacated by the city or town council, the property within the limits so vacated shall belong to the abutting owners, one-half to each. The attached County Document (270325- 2.pdf) indicates a dotted line down the middle of the easement being vacated, so the fee title may belong to the abutting owners, one-half to each. I am also attaching a document (Quit Claim Deed before Street Vacation.pdf) that shows how one abutting owner quit claim deeded their one-half fee title interest in a portion of 8th to their neighbor PRIOR to a street vacation. I am sad to see that the applicant was made to pay for an appraisal prior to anybody knowing if such will be necessary. Should this street vacation go forward, please ask yourself why this applicant would be treated differently than the applicant involved with Resolution No. 1145. Please see Resolution No. 1145 attached (Resolution 1145.pdf). In Resolution No. 1145, the City Council determined that the value of the property should be reduced to reflect the costs associated with obtaining an appraisal and the other associated costs of the vacation process. Please also appreciate that the Street Vacation Code update has been sitting on the extended agenda for years. The 2019 City Council was unable to reach a final decision. Instead, the 2019 City Council voted to initiate a two-step process to resolve the differences between the Planning Board and the Staff recommendations and to add a second public hearing. The 2019 City Council Clearly ATTAC H M E N I Packet Pg. 407 9.2.a tasked City Staff with responsibilities. The City Attorney was asked to help City Staff with drafting the related Ordinance. The last words on the topic are documented in the October 15, 2019 City Council Meeting minutes: "Mayor Earling assumed this would be done by the end of the year or the process would need to start over." What City Council requested was not done by the end of 2019. It is still not done as we approach the second half of 2022. City Staff and the City Attorney did not do what the 2019 City Council asked them to do Would this applicant have had to pay for an appraisal if City Staff and the City Attorney did what the 2019 City Council asked them to do? I highly doubt it as revising the appraisal process and timing was something both staff and Planning Board agreed on in 2019! A great amount of Planning Board work and citizen work was expended in response to City Staff's effort to update our Street Vacation Code. I felt called to get involved as a citizen and I spent many hours working on this. I knew very well what Edmonds City_ government is willing to do to }property owners. I suspected our City Staff was not doing this on behalf of our property owners. I believe my fears were confirmed during the August 14, 2019 Planning Board Meeting when City Attorney Jeff Taraday told the Planning Board: "I represent the City of Edmonds. I'm here to advance the interest of the City of Edmonds, not individual property owners." Yes, he really said that. What must happen when City Staff and City Attorney fail to do what City Council asks them to do? This massive legislative process was initiated by City Staff. The action City Staff initiated required much time to be spent by our valuable Planning Board. Citizens were made to choose to participate or stand by passively and allow City Staff to be the only voices Planning Board and City Council would hear. Please read my related Letter to the Editor: https://myedmondsnews.com/2021/11/letter-to-the-editor-what-can-be-learned-from-a-failed- legislative-process/ Letter to the editor: What can be a learned from a failed legislative process? - My Edmonds News THIS. The government should put citizen input, Advisory panel, with more weight than unelected bureaucrats. City staff? myedmondsnews.com I am very disappointed that City Officials allow this conduct to take place. Why have City Staff and the City Attorney not been held accountable for not doing what they were asked to do by City Council on October 15, 2019? Packet Pg. 408 9.2.a Will this process now have to start over as represented by former Mayor Earling on October 15, 2019? If it starts over, are Planning Board members and citizens going to have to spend more time over and above what was expended the first time? City Staff gets a "i while working on stuff like this. Planning Board and citizens aren't compensated with public money while working hard on legislation. My hope is that a higher level of respect will be afforded our Advisory Boards and citizens who participate in the legislative process. I encourage City Officials to learn from this failed legislative effort, an effort initiated by City Staff. City Council hopefully will discuss a Resolution adopting Council Rules of Procedure sometime in the future. I strongly request City Council consider its constituents while doing this. Please adopt rules governing the steps City Council will take when City Staff or the City Attorney do not do what City Council asks them to do. Thank you. Ken Reidy, citizen of Edmonds Packet Pg. 409 201389 •�...:-� ,f :.. ll�l�f �f�I�������IIIII�'lfl�[1i��91�s'I6'I�I��I�'II��I M 00 PG AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO 7 ITONaMe TERESA SVA"TON NCN Addnbei3 BaS SPRA.GU E STREET ChY- State. ZIP EDMONDS, WA 9W20 Quit Claim Dead Vjg-GRANTOR, MARILYN HARDESTY, on unrnarrkcd we,oan, for and in rwaidcmlion to lacf�-f&-A• and U43fer bu nght w acquift her paraw of mid property fmin the Ci ry of Fdm nds. conveys a10 Still cfmmll-uG.KUM SIMANTON AND TERESA Sjr4AJNTOlq. husband and wife. the rollowsng .1'-."4Whbcd icalIN-8i= revaie. County or s s oimm is". Sue of W=hpogtowi, together wi ch all after C:§fw kkMin -NUE NORTIl Ltr ix BETWEEN Of OCKS Of AND 84, CITY OF rw PEAT -rifF.Ftroi, RECORDED IN VOLUIAL 2 Of PWLTS, Pk E %90UECOk Or"OeSNO11 G%1 I Sl I COUNTY, WASHINCTON, LYI.NC. SOJ) rfl E R l.V OF rN E 513�7-1`1 LIME 'OF Tflt ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 81 AND 94 AND NORTHERLY OF TILE NORTH MARL 1,14F SP lkgCUF. STREET AM t-RI&N This document is filed for record by FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO as an accomodation only It has not been examined as it its execution or as to ils affect upon the litle TAX PARCEL 0 Doled AR A RJDF'4 I V STATE OF WAS I U 1443TON Coup F'ry OF I ctnify that I kno,, or have mialiatiorf evidence .. r�"ARJIYN"AARDESTY is Lhc pawn who appeared before me. mnd said pereon ackwwjt4ed Lho, Sjjj argdcd 1h;l mssrumni and wknowlefted it to be HF. F: frea and vohmnary act far i1w uses and pkirpoelell ii4r4cow in [lira inorumcm Nied --------- Notary Puh1K to d so 4f WaAlo'gion Rmidrng at Hr. OVARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASP-NGTON complisso" EXPRES 2M 2., Packet Pg. 410 9.2.a QUARTER SECTION TOWNSHIP N.W,B.L. RANGE E.W.M. R3E_ RAE _ FEE RSE ROE ROE R_- R10E R11 ALL lfAPB, DATA, AHD DiFOAMATiDH SET FORTH HEREEH f•DATA'I, ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AN OFFICIAL CITATION __ —_—_ROE __ _ ____ TO, OR REPRESENTAT[DH OF- THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY' CODE" AMENDMENTS AND UPDATES TO THE DATA, TOGETHER WITH OTHER APPLICABLE COUNTY CODE - �~ PROVISIONS. MAY APPLY WHECH ARE NOT DEPICTED HERE [N" SN ONO MESH CO LINTY MAKES NO IRS PRESS NT.ATEON OR WARRANTY CONCERNING THE CONTENT. ACCURACY, CURRENCY, COMPLETENESS OR OVALETY OF THE DATA CONTAINED HEREIN AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY OP MERCHANTABILITY OR PiTNES3 FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE" ALL PE RSDHS ACCE SSiNG OR OTHERWISE USING THIS DATA ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR USE THEREOF AND AGREE TO HOLD NW SNDHOMISHAID COUNTY HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ANY CWPRDAMAGE B LOSS CLAIM DA LIABILITY ANCIEARMING FOUTROM OF ANY ERROR. DEFECT IS $ OFJNDN CONTAINED s u'iTH3N SHED pATR. WASH]NGTON STATE LAW, CH- 42,56 RCW. PRpHi63T3 SPATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES PROM PRpYlpLyG ACCESS 1'O LISTS OF 1Np1VipVAL3 INTENDS]] FOR USE FOR CO M MERCLAL PURPOSES AND, THUS" NO COMM ERCFAL USE MAY BE MADE OF ANY DATA COMPRISING LISTS OF INDIVIDUALS CONTAINED HEREIN" - .: el 1 Centerline - - - Lot Block Section - - City Limits s .e� _AA i -. Gov Lot Subdiv ROW Quarter Tax Acct r f«, 4 I inch = 200 feet - --. - -- - Major Water Other Lot - Vac ROW - - - - 16th - Easement A product of the Assessor's Office- ,Vap produced on May 23, 2022 Snohomish County, Washington Minor Water Other Subdiv Vac Lot R9E--_RSE---R3E--RSE•---R9E�--I?HIE---R9fE SW-24-27-03 p . - 4-123 �� i 2 H+i�r; F 4-124 T7 EMERAL 4-135 I �9���� rzo PG�4p ��� I Gb z �o WALNUT wain LI-I.'uvlpr[t CDNCMINILJM {7819] f O p CONDO z z { OMI — — — AMBRIDGE w w RIN PLACE I ! J — I o: 4 'r 40 39 38 3� 116115 WALNUF ST o,-------------'--r.*----------------+ I i 33 2 3i 0 29 8L27 fi 25 L321 F 02 38 37 36 35 34132131300= ! E'3 3 8 10 1 1 i 16— 1 3Z32 31 30 9 I 1 28 7 26 5 2413r22 1 20 , B^ AFN — — — 29 0091 5001 1 2 39 3 37 3 35 34 33 32 �= I — 31 3[ - --- - -- --- -- - -- - - - - --- --- D I PLACE iH+:iI.+I;`�J:3 B} 4-134 �2❑ CONDO OF z {8002} E 24 o¢p EdMpnlbS CONDO 03fiTHAVE 01 �_ THE {8s00J 4:r I 0 i 4 5 8 9 } fi 1 21 I CONQ-d ,��C) {sa43j ¢ w S {79s8 p2 01• x+ r } (9182} 1-041 �7 �+ GREGCR x r P S- 1-87 25CONDo x } , =� z-a2s x -' ------ ----------- SP -- -------------- -2 f --- tNAfNrl:1:GL] x + ,�* ^ x a{ s-zao 45 1 z j { I, a �' C' p [ 10709} o o r�I ` 2-208 2-207 2-118 -067 2-029 { a �3 N z , 1 { --^ 1 ;+x+,v r+x _ -�r-' __ —_ N _ 4 2-031 2_fl33 - LE -} - - - N N , RCN ; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1i 12 13 4 5 16 17 8 19 20 1 _ 3 4 2-030 x x �1t, ELL GG� PLR T S 2119 2 191 AF 121 1 SPS 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 '18 9 0+11 12+ 3 14 15 1" 1718 1 p E13 N 1 S 4 5} �II'f 2' 'In-, -6 7 '9 x7OM ALBERT B L F j 9 21.3). 41 5 6 71JIIJ�910 11 , 1-025 m3 2-081 {tit-083 x 2-085 2-087 r - - - - - - - - - - - - z r t 2-089 I 2-182 2-038i r' 2-228 CE[]AR S-T -- - - - -- - -- i - - -- - ter;+s 2 y� I { s j `+ ' YhYh'�a�Y.W+ii+a yet r tr'�:•�.w; w + 4 5 6 7 8 9 1U ii o �:+>�+H �:+ t VIE W x 5 G `v,, s s i x 2-09D ! 2-039� -037� { -036 2-227 cv 1 2 3 4 5 6 T 8 9 10 }112 13 # 161 1718 9 z0 I 4 11 1 2 I 1 2 02 2-080 2-0$2 2-fl$4 2-086 2-088 z 9 I T 1 `0.4; '{ ti 1 U)a ! x 3 s 3 �• -LL T WAY--- - - - r_ x SEAWQ❑ I-IDMES 5 — — - — — — — — -- -- -- — — + + ,' + 02 Q M �� II 3029 28 27 2fi 25 24J2§ 22 21 20 REPL- OF sP 8`�0�' 2-042 1 1 1 µ- '+V o^' 2-138 1 Z 3 4 [�8401 f I M i�io r. j 10 N- �� it SAND A Al EVII Z� o o° 15 14 13 12 1 JO H R Y 7E S "D D I T 10 N 140 39 38 37 fi 3 34 3 32 31 30 29 8 27 6 25 24 23 22 21 -008 I O2 2 �' z-17z +h'i 7F V r I A S_g_$2 B 7 01 �D 5 4 01 �P `e 2 18 17 1fi D1 j ICI+;�+;+,y',,•.'�. y 2-048 ��3 ��} $ 9 CU�O I� - - -_ ---- - - w tixw 2-093 Lo RT 3� -- pR- 1 2-044 = = - - SPRUCE-----S-T---- - F 6 =- }_ o ca (JR- 5 T}- - ! z p] I go\ 1-009 } �l r:rr;ry ':r r:; '�er+iil+h+H+Y+ + - �.h +1�ii;K o 2-047 r sP + o , 19s�- 0 �, 1-044 -1-043 = •I -042 N r1-029 HOMELAND - 01 01 01 Qz-ao7 a 2 a77 -IV 9} - _ i 2-095 Q 2-055 I + 2-049 z-15a x ,,) t ` r'+„ r•.vr ; C1 i + 2 '3I 4 5-1 fi 7 9 0 11 12 Jj-'T 4 17 38 19 20 r� Y'�s 2 2-D32 II N �G -- 3 9 10 11 H+,,},iF;N,+}:� [ x ! U2 D1 r--- - - -- �+iN�+I i; [��� $ 2-054 ��:+�;, n4r,�.r.rfi�r r * 1-147 Z 5 6 7 2-096 2-052 u $- �- -$ - - - - - - - 2-D08` { 0�92-187w + 1 1-04� a 03 :iH V'i ✓-Vi .1+H r4Yh .ti -- -f,,, - _ —__I — —� _ _ _ 1 _ _2tOQ5 1 12 z-05� 2-050 - - - - - _ - o Ho ELAND A DITI©N (4773) 2-097 -174 ?2-051 2-157 � Y YauxnwrWYVWvru; Yiei I ` I 0 39 8 37 3 35 34 3 321 0 2 28 2 26 25 24 2122 21 I '''�� ' I' SPA 5-7-89 r r-2-183 .. 2-184 I P 5- :- f 2-D09 5P 5-14-9 i o 2 �, B •}: C HOMELA ❑ DD1T14�N WESTINy I x2-175 :*,��' 0 2-153 , r+w+ r 7 16 5 4 3 2 1 2-190 2-056 0 x x a I. " 3"� �� 4 > z `.� I w Q I z-152 z-185 2-167 2-186 �^ 0 I �3 A + A a N. 2 (47 4) 1 2 3 4 rz 1 �- --1-•1EML-DEK- -- - - - -- `s' = - it 1-148 1 5T SP 57 -9 -149 �. 1 L NVILLA g �,� �. ' - a48 i o o-Fj pC - - ,ory- - - -- �- - - -- - M CK 2-154r 2-057 Q o Q N vl G S a 0 2 r TR 9 1... cn jj WAY-_- -- I x [V { CD x 2 1 1 O 1' '2 '4 . 6 i s 9 10 1112 13 14 1516 1718 19 20 10 2 2 I 1-163 'sue.4 ,o 5 i BELLA 2-105 T �- o} 2-1 D1 :2-o9s D2 00 10 5 I 2 `Z" 1 1-162 _ cooLA x cv N r i a r m o r wl� A x �cD I - - _ _ - 9 l a $ 1 2 11 4 coNoo ry cv x t;, +1.i iV, i 11 # 1 ; IT - - - - - - - - - - _ - LAlJREL WAY 2 011 cP c ? �4-48 3 +a+r:r:Iily{7x*vrr+r�' rrrvrTv :err' +i++i * p 2-155 5P5-25-T7 6 I z i —ads.- � yLLA 7-37 7 I + -1 D6 ! 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 0 29 28 2 6 z 4 23 2 21 3 B1�4 LLA 2 -4 _ ^r_ w- - -L (90E5) - I x p� O� } pip 2 �� �^ �;H+ii�r+r D3 $ 7 J 2-107 KARINA rssSitila 5� tyi�i wlNs oN CONDO ;� iY4KiA PARK ADITIO (6109) i ! 5 2-012t 2-D13 �' 1-051 1" � r r I CONDO ' 729,] x ni N N x` 4 �455$} �, 1-015 �77z5f 1,4+14":++i+> i•i�+A �;+N�:I �r:t,r �; 3 C, �2-114 j 2-188 2 16fl 2-QAO - - - - - - - -- - - j SEAM❑NT �:+'�*"�: r 2-058 LAUF�EL 5T j lzt4wh" n I PLACE 2-178 SP S-96-49 r * ::; r,4� 4,r C B SR S-D3-153 3 sii 44 i++:4li;ii}44i i' a 1 1-017 J W cowo❑ 2-126 c 3 2 2-169x* N2-115 ! SP 5-19 85 I I I 1� 2�❑� ` 2-014 1 �54 1-132 139 8295 2-197 2-1 $ :+i4:iY.i }FE F;.$r �aai+i� 2-059 1 2 3 4 5 6 ++++r,^�� 2 202 2-016�� �' 1 C13 EMERAL❑ SP 5 3.86 s,ir ti+,•, - I — 7 8 9 1 1i 12 13 14 15 16 17 8 19 2a 1 Vv" T 4 2-D 5 I 1 z 3 4 E �, ' 1 2-16s 2-� 16 sPs--a61 T j 1-016 ❑ Z u7 CREST 2 8 r.�r #r+,;,,+Hi-+iI-0.F 1 -- - - - - - - - - - - - 2�203 2 2D5 ' -140 2-125 2-177 2-i98 x Z r` x2CS—— 1' SPPLN2017i0033 [+ I 2-19s `x+'''' SP 81-1D1 �` I CONDO vi ¢ 121 [D x Q �2-117 -052 * 2-D72 +si+Ysa.�ti�A;xl+a~sa�WA�'W 2-D24 * r A z B OO x C7 k, x2-204 2-D25 :r. r �,*'ii44Y 2-019 ' 7 1-D18 illl (7791j A V](b(DB f i r r Yd'XhWh' 2-063 2-094 ,u_tv 2-012 2-Dz1 2-110 r [ZI ' ++i 1-169T _ 1-i52 Q '` - Q 2-124 •' a rt r I 1 x z-D64,co fl56 2-023 2 20fi I�1 1s7 c ,acr2_ a 4 2-018 2 t 1 '�A I �' N at N r cv 2-151 SP S-3*$9 YyxN ! 77 2 CNI x SP S- -15 SP 5-28-89 1 1-1fi8��" '06 ` 1 r - _ -- z SIP : „ L N - - - - - PINE - ST - - - - ---� - - I - -- - __ -1 - -- ---�-- ==-P-I 1E=ST}= --��—_=W—_ � --��— - - 1 c °,z =�- w 1 � = 21-6TH---- EDMND��1 ! N YO T'S ! FIRST AQD To 1 01 j w - S-T-- ; 02 r x Y A e + EDM NDS i �6194}' Q r { 10 1 1 � 0 1: 0� 02 I 01 ao Sp 5-98-20 CU [ C� r [ Lo a 2-1 28 , , +r Yr "'W 1 'I"0 1 �v � � j i (5820) PJ�� Llf7 o I- r Nti m - r, :c �� ! I D1 } D2 j SD1 �24 D2 i +�+.N2Hr. I rY µN D1 <� '! I 11".is' 10 ! 1 1 T 2 M } in 2 ��' o° 0❑ ti a �' o� +N; cv N x Y.i' j D0 ' Aqqq �� w �2 i D2 i Q DO o1 i 1-146 1-155 r C o G°���a1 X zo a)� U o r�7 COW � A. } 2-129 i g � 2 ,.,�+Ig I 01��* Q •�,::„��,:� I firrr,�r+f+r � i i 02 D© I i � i�4+u�� N� N L1J [D Q co iur I 5 2 i�Hg+wi u.i'� r Vx Q] N Lu U Lu LU LU U v r r�[I] row ��3{ p 1 I i 02 01 53 B 02 D2 1 02 1 4'd Y i'r r' 4 R I g 1 2 1-092 1-093 -1 N BOARDWALK 1 01 H+Hti+H}}N+iikfYh'r.ti'F;'h'fi.4d:N+y Z = 02 b2 01 ! CV N r�!i� 5P 5-22-8 I k J � I SP 21-83 I � I OF EDMONDS 8 +hiii3,+Fi 01 8„ g A 00 02 ! 01 1 01 00 II a 00 �- +:di'I+ I} F' rr:rN i �rg�:+N. 4Vh'l3'rVr' $ f 1-097 1-096 CONDO (7~a72} - - --FDRSYT-H-- - - $ ,r~'r,r 3 4'iir5 45iFhYtSiH}-W.i:ifi:iFi#4 lAN E - a 01 00 B 01 *� 01 I i D 1 02 DO AMENDED �¢ /� SPPLIV20oa3 I 01 1 +�,vr ,r . + 01 �y I 1-098 s 1-135 53, �A2-139 22sz 01 I o DD D2 D1 D1 02 D1 1 n1 I D1 A 1`O I 4 �1QD B 2252x4 I +rl,r+7r+rlrr 4 ii45�r +aa,+ram 7r.�++ri+Y x; r '.r {Cr o 3 i _7. i, i5i4 4ii i4+ i + I; �.i i 4 N ! YN; r,'+x 4 1 7 4C'p� Q PLN20 40 10 DO 02 I 01 2 01 f +vr r +t:Y4n �_ji I 4 + �� Q - j MAPLEVINE + aO G Q' 2-194 - ��+ „ -I I x i `n i 1 O2 i 02 I/] D1 I DD 1 00 1 Q g0D 1-101 x GARDE �GQ rye 4 3 ''�z 1 1 D1 x 3 02 2 a1 01 03 I i °' Q I vlEw co $ i 00 o° 01 00 1 ! 02 1 SP AFN 85D221 DD$2 �"- CONDO CONDO r2-19312-192 2-142 �++r. [ 5 D1 W r6 f �4�•� ! .44Hj._.&yH u�r;�Wrrr xr, wr' sN+;.4 sN+;• I jt [ si SPIS-1190 z 1 + 01 W 5 6+ 5 ! 5 1-102 x 1 141 (6873} 1 I 00 DO 4 eeL 1 01 02 02 01 2 0 I Ga 6 I 1 CALA15 OLYM:PIC----____ I - - L ¢ 01 I -1 a1-103 w b° 2-143 3 2 --- - -- - -- - ! I I 1 1 07 2 GONsa �q ' 1 D1 ti� -� - -� FIR- --! -sT -j-- - - --� ------�----- - - - - +- - - -- 5P 5-7-85 i 10537 �����, I 4 FIR-- -P-L- - ¢ 11°RD2 I ¢ + DO D1 1 1 z j �o { ! 01 ! i `� SHAMROCK I �1 I I 01 10 i e A f i C .4 � 71 F.V / 7 � 5 6 5e 2 i 01 00 i i a1 t D0 011 02 0214a01 0011 I 10 I 1 10 1 8 � . ,137, PLAZA CONDO 7 $ O2 5P-24- 6 �'""" 1-108� 7W Yr.1-145 6$D0 �° Q1 i D1 D1 i D13 ! 1 iFIi+A+}H+ 1-111 A D i 7 ) L�4NE 5300 g 2 �,•• D1 01 ; E as i hi4 ;.Si 1- Ftd:.E I Wvr v9 r A I+r+rr cV 02 *r,� 2 i 9 N 2 i g ! N:,� +x� ,! i 4 P 5-14-82 2-144 9 02 1 02 02 �,� 4 a A 2 9 2 I 1-1 SEAVUE 2-147 i 0 `� 1 1 i �"�� I 02 I I i 5 3 1-114 2 714 01 CONDO - x N 011 W062 4 3 2 01 I} J ; t 00 i i 1-1 \ •tiY,i'.��,iY.4'' r+�ii''�1.Yrr; I h4,i ,+.4'.5•• +3}`„ii�,{y ,. w o I 18 f CI] _ (6912) HIGHLAND $ s i z E r $,; V 0i'i4 1 "N V3Yr.. a D1 41 00 ' ;ti5 fY 5xisi 1� t 5 1 oa U) i r c 1 D2 D1 I 17 E 2 1fi I c P H 2 "+ ` ivr.uwti+ M, I + 2 g 00 I PARK 7 2-148 1 oz i D1 i 7, D1 ` I�+H Q?N x� 02 �- - - - QQ �v.A'r„ri�rrAa 1 RESERVGIR RESERV ! 18 7 �. •` 7 I i•Y.rWrHi. I , 7 V EL-M - WAY--- •- ; 41 1 02 02 a1 ix1 2-149 D1 ;- - -�. 1� $ �q RL , 10 11 12 CONDOMINIUM HE _HL =ND { a1 fi i ErY rvr I"I Q1 +1�1 02 ; II G TEVIf o PH 1 4 3 ad:2 6 I_.I g II �.5+ F�Fiyii 1�t1 I V AY.S'•'; AY 15 01; # 02 j 02 1 j I I 00 1�*i i 01 13 12 g 9 8 7 6 [8363� PARKr{4 2) 1 14 10 _-L_�� ��E_�M-STD -- - 220TH —S-T--SW�-----� SE VISTA x: W - -- -- �' �,' 3-012 g 21 22 -20 g '\ T oo� E� M VIEW ADD DIV B Q P�WELLS s o�:M13-Do1 `. 18 2 3 4 5 6 1 j 2 �� sr. ' 1 1 1 10 1 28 �. 23 - T 1 2 {53 6 � t ' 4 7 ��a 4 x 17 t 14 ELM- VIE "} 2❑ 1 3 4 7 ��, ! 0 31 25 �.. E L- -JIB] - 3 W 3 ❑ i A D 54 72 Q 2 j 2 9 2 \ 26 r 13 • A _ 2 F- nn 1 R I V11lLLOW 36 33 �. LM-P ,� �ti \!.i_ 4. r.�t 5 Q --EL-1�11- - - 1 U) .L SW-25-27-03 Packet Pg. 411 9.2.a 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 4/18/07 RESOLUTION NO. 1145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, STATING THE INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO VACATE A PORTION OF 8TH AVENUE NORTH, NORTH OF SPRAGUE STREET, ESTABLISHING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SUCH VACATION AND STATING THE INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO VACATE SUCH RIGHT-OF-WAY UPON FULFILLMENT OF THE CONDITIONS.. WHEREAS, on October 28, 2005, the Edmonds City Council held a public hearing regarding a vacation of certain unopened right-of-way along 8th Avenue North, north of Sprague Street, and shown on the attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, and, WHEREAS, at said hearing, no evidence was presented showing a need for the public right-of-way for the purpose of passage, but City staff noted a need for a thirty (30) foot easement to be retained for maintenance and erosion control projects of the adjacent drainage way of Shell Creek as needed; and WHEREAS, the fair market value of the property was appraised to be Twenty- two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($22,500); and fifty percent (50%) of that value or Eleven Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($11,250) is the target established by Edmonds ordinance as an appropriate value for the property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the value of the property should be reduced to reflect the costs associated with obtaining an appraisal and the other associated costs of the vacation process, as well as a required lot line adjustment and the cost of {WSS658647.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - Packet Pg. 412 9.2.a tree removal, yielding in the City Council's estimation, a reasonable compensation to the public of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the vacation is in the public interest, that no property will be denied access as a result of the vacation, that a construction easement should be retained for the purpose of maintaining the adjacent Shell Creek drainage way by construction, maintenance, erosion control and the removal of invasive non- native species from the site, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby states its intent to vacate a portion of the unopened right-of-way of 8th Avenue North, north of Sprague Street and shown on the attached Exhibit A upon fulfillment of the following condition: 1.1 receipt and confirmation of the sum of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500) within ninety (90) days of the date of enactment of this resolution. and 1.2 that an easement be retained for construction, maintenance, erosion control and control of vegetation relating to the adjacent drainage way. Section 2. When the City Clerk has confirmed receipt of such funds and/or that a check for such amount has cleared the appropriate bank and the funds deposited to the credit of the City, and that such payment was received and cleared within ninety (90) days of the passage of this resolution, the City Clerk is authorized and directed to place an ordinance of vacation upon the City Council's Consent Agenda for passage. Section 3. If the condition of payment is not fulfilled as provided in Section 2 above, this resolution shall be void and without effect. {WSS658647.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Pg. 413 9.2.a RESOLVED this 8th day of May, 2007. APPROV ! . I �� MAY R, G H KENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: C TY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 04/27/2007 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 05/08/2007 RESOLUTION NO. 1145 {WSS658647.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Pg. 414 9.2.a Exhibit A 84 ALLEYAL4Y 81 _'N 8r� 89'39 -813 1 y W .a a z w� �, ��'► 7 / 00 K7 i � N 4-T22�p" E VAGAYF-D SPRAatjj;-,. C+\D RRA55 p15[ S1 SEhMP6W "TH'� KO-O 4561 I —S STREET VACATION EXHISiT O W 2W 40' W. W. FOR SCALIE ; 1' 4a" KEI TH .& TERESA SIMAN TC1N 0 O N N O N Z J d C O R L) L U) 0 a� c •L a� d Packet Pg. 415 9.2.a " City of Edmonds Zoning Map 0 o ;,11, 4 r � -- �. 1125 T � r T r ... 33 n-y 150 1140 1 RS-10 ; 1 1 125 1: 1,348 Oj 900' 0 112.34 224.7 Feet 167.3 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site ar 2,0�8 p B p pp g reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be ac WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise r © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRU ■ Legend 0 ReZones PRD RoW Zoning RS-6 RS-8 RS-10 RS-12 © RSW-12 RS-20 RS-MP RM-3 RM-2.4 ■ RM-1.5 RM-EW BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 OR ® WMu ® BP BN ® FVMU BC Notes N N O N Z J d V 3 a Q Cd V- O LO 1* 0 O N N O N Z J a a+ E z U a Q Packet Pg. 416 9.2.a Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM July 19, 2022 Michele Szafran, Associate Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager PLN2022-0045 — Street Vacation Scudder — 838 Fir Street The Engineering and Maintenance & Operations Divisions of Public Works have reviewed the subject street vacation application. At one time, the subject right-of-way shown below (outlined in blue) continued to the south, but this area was vacated under Ord. 777. The portion that was vacated is shown hatched in purple and extends through the realigned public street Sea Vista Pl. This previous street vacation appears to have been completed in conjunction with the development of the plat to the south. .6 mil i 0 O N N O N Z J d C 0 r M L) a� as L L aM c M a) x a City of Edmonds ATTAC H M E N Packet Pg. 417 9.2.a There are no existing City utilities located within the right-of-way subject the street vacation and there are no future plans to locate utilities within the subject right-of-way. Public access through this portion of right-of-way is not needed and is no longer feasible with the existence of the established single-family residential neighborhood to the south. The Engineering and Maintenance & Operations Divisions of Public Works have determined the subject right-of-way does not need to be reserved for public use and no City easements need to be retained. Thank you. Packet Pg. 418 9.2.b RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, STATING ITS INTENT TO VACATE THE PORTION OF UNOPENED ALLEY RIGHT-OF- WAY SOUTH OF FIR STREET AND ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTIES ADDRESSED 838 FIR ST. AND 1108 9TH AVE. S. UPON THE FULFILLMENT OF CERTAIN CONTIONS. WHEREAS, on August 2, 2022, the Edmonds City Council adopted resolution No. 1501 establishing a public hearing on a proposed street vacation, File No. PLN2022-0045; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed street vacation was held on September 20, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the vacation is in the public interest, and that no property will be denied access as a result of the vacation; and WHEREAS, there are no easements to the City required; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing, the record contained a real estate appraisal showing the value of the proposed vacation area to be $35,000; and WHEREAS, the subject right-of-way was originally acquired pursuant to dedication with the Plat of Yost's First Addition to Edmonds; and WHEREAS, pursuant to ECDC 20.70.140.A.3.a and RCW 35.79.030 the City may be compensated up to an amount equal to one-half of the fair market value of the right-of- way prior to vacation by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds $17,500 (one-half of $35,000) is reasonable compensation when determined in accordance with the fair market value of the land to be vacated; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1 Packet Pg. 420 9.2.b Section 1. The city council hereby states its intent to vacate by ordinance the portion of unopened alley right-of-way south of Fir Street and adjacent to the properties addressed 838 Fir St. and 1108 9th Ave. S. as shown on the attached Exhibits A and B and further described in File No. PLN2022-0045, which exhibit and file are incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth as long as the following conditions are met within ninety (90) days of adoption of this resolution: 1. The petitioners shall deposit $17,500 with the City of Edmonds, which is one-half the appraised value of the vacation property, and which money, upon adoption of an ordinance vacating the property, shall belong to the City of Edmonds. RESOLVED THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022: ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. 2 MAYOR MIKE NELSON Packet Pg. 421 9.2.b EXHIBIT "A" 17-foot Alley Vacation THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 6, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. k L41INa9_191N1111l1011ZIW�YNalaafL'9Z0110IiFM BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS AND A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF FIR STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88'40'14" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF SAID BLOCK 12, YOST'S FIRST ADDITION TO EDMONDS; THENCE SOUTH 01'17'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 119.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 88'42'57" WEST 17.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE NORTH 01°17'03"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 119.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON Packet Pg. 422 9.2.b SCUDDER fs] LOT 10 BLOCK 12 YOST'S FIRST ADD A TO EDMONDS U VOL. 8, Pr, 6 30' 1 7- EXHIBIT `B" FIR ST. 0 L1 17' ALLEY TO BE VACATED rn � SCHENKAR LOT 1 w 3 BLOCK 12 a } YOST'S FIRST ADD. n TO EDMONDS a VOL. 8, PG. 6 0 z 0 L2 MILLER / 4 SO' 5 , vOL 12" / 3 r LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 17.0D 568'40'14" E L2 17.00 N88'42 57"W .1 x � u a� SCALE - 1" = 50' 3p' EXHIBIT B Ln le O O N 04 O N Z J a 0 V m L N O c 'L 2 7 a Packet Pg. 423 10.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Park Land Acquisition Report Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Angie Feser Background/History The Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department has actively pursued parkland acquisition for the past two years as one of the Mayor's priorities for the City of Edmonds. The purpose of acquiring property is for the conservation of the community's natural resources. The presentation scheduled for the September 20, 2022, City Council meeting is to share an update of park land acquisition efforts including property considerations and negotiations to date as well as share methods used to acquire public property and funding sources. Highlights are included in this agenda item with more detail provided during the presentation. 2021 Acquisitions The transfer of nearly one acre of property at 9309 Bowdoin Way adjacent to Yost Park donated by Shirley Johnson was completed during 2021 and is now part of the Edmonds park system. The historical site contains a house and several outbuildings, numerous fruit and significant trees and connects Bowdoin Way and Yost Park. In addition, a result of records research determined the City has a 1968 Use Deed for 20 acres of tidelands adjacent to and north of Brackett's Landing North Park which provides access to nearly 1,000 feet of beach and Puget Sound and prohibits future development of the beach or tidelands. 2020 - 2021 Property Considerations and Negotiations The past two years the Parks Department has evaluated more than a dozen properties and engaged in negotiations for a number of potential acquisitions, both in the form of donation and purchase. These include, but are not limited to, the following parcels. Donations - owner approached City about possible donation 1. 232"d St W/Edmonds Way, 0.5 acre, developed with small house (owner changed their mind) 75th PI W/Meadowdale Rd, 1.28 acres, undeveloped (owner conditions not agreeable with City) Donations - ongoing discussion between jurisdictions 3. Southwest Snohomish County Park, 120 acres within Edmonds city limits, open space 4. Esperance Park, 9.55 acres outside Edmonds city limits, developed park Purchase - negotiations not actively ongoing 5. Perrinville Woods, 4.69 acres, mostly undeveloped land (2 houses) 6. Main Street Property, 0.15 acre, undeveloped Packet Pg. 424 10.1 Purchase - negotiations ongoing 1. Unocal Property (adjacent to Edmonds Marsh), 21.13 acres, undeveloped 2. Hwy 99 Property, developed Staff Recommendation No Council action necessary as this is an update of the park land acquisition program. Narrative Acquisition Methods Methods for land acquisition may be divided into four general categories: purchase, donation, conservation and other. Purchases include methods to achieve an outright purchase of property at fair market value and can be Fee Simple Purchase, Option to Purchase or Right of First Refusal. Donations include approaches to work with a private property owner to ultimately donate property to the City such as Full Donation, Partial Donation and Life Estate. Conservation methods work to achieve conservation of property in its current context through use of Snohomish County funding programs. These programs have many stipulations and limitations, but when properties are eligible for and fit these programs, these methods can be effective tools to accomplish acquisition goals. They include Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), Public Benefit Rating System (PBRS) and Conservation Futures Grant Program. There are other creative tools and techniques to accomplish land acquisition. These methods include the acquisition of partial property rights, such as public easements, leases, land trades and partnership agreements. Also included are private developer obligations which result in dedications of property. In rare cases relating to essential public facilities, eminent domain may also be a tool for land acquisition. Funding Land acquisitions can require considerable funding resources and at time extend beyond existing capital allocations. The City currently has nearly $1.1M allocated for land acquisition, with an additional $200,000 designated to accumulate annually in the fund. Other city funding sources include REET (Real Estate Excise Tax), PIF (Park Impact Fees) and General Fund. The City also has the ability to borrow money in ways including the use of bond funds. State and local grants are another source of acquisition resources, but timing of funding cycles and landowner purchase requirements can be an issue. In those situations, there are programs through land trust organizations that can bridge the timing of fund expenditures and availability. Packet Pg. 425 10.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Development Code Rewrite Work Plan Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michael Clugston Background/History This is a new item. Staff Recommendation Staff will give a presentation about a proposed work plan for the development code update work and would like Council's support on the approach. Packet Pg. 426 10.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 2022 September Budget Amendment Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History Amend the 2022 Ordinance No. 4270 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Council approve Ordinance No. XXXX amending the 2022 Budget. Attachments: 2022 September Budget Amendment Ordinance 2022 September Decision Package Exhibits 2021-23 Commerce Update Grant App Instructions G ra nt Awa rd Letter Packet Pg. 427 10.3.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4270 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers and increases in appropriations; and WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is transferred from one fund to another; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2022 Budget; and THEREFORE, WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4270 adopting the final budget for the fiscal year 2022 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, and D adopted herein by reference. 1 Packet Pg. 428 10.3.a Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED: MAYOR, MIKE NELSON 2 Packet Pg. 429 10.3.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4270 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 12022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 3 Packet Pg. 430 10.3.a EXHIBIT "A": Budget Amendment Summary (September 2022) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION 2022 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES 2022 ENDING FUND BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 15,931,350 44,986,484 52,919,589 7,998,245 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 255,218 225,000 260,490 219,728 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 25,000 - 25,000 - 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 1,782,150 - 1,782,150 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 16,421 - 5,900 10,521 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,400,001 119,645 545,000 3,974,646 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 848,616 - - 848,616 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND - 200,000 200,000 - 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND - - - - 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 75,174 167,210 45,800 196,584 111 STREET FUND 951,166 1,751,930 2,315,780 387,316 112 COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE 2,238,449 13,684,871 12,868,796 3,054,524 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 648,879 216,701 195,380 670,200 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 71,114 84,410 100,900 54,624 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 76,524 26,540 26,880 76,184 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 14,259 1,550 3,000 12,809 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 95,972 29,590 28,200 97,362 125 PARK ACCl/IMPROVEMENT 4,053,415 2,271,020 4,589,688 1,734,747 126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 3,313,338 2,261,030 2,483,667 3,090,701 127 G I FTS CATALOG FU N D 301,524 82,750 78,400 305,874 130 C EMETERY MAI NTENANCE/I MP ROV 266,205 182,430 220,561 228,074 136 PARKSTRUSTFUND 168,589 4,330 50,000 122,919 137 CEMETERYMAINTENANCETRUST FD 1,107,074 43,520 25,000 1,125,594 138 SISTERCITY COMMISSION 15,481 10,290 11,900 13,871 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND 29,132 79,349 87,680 20,801 141 AFFORDABLE & SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 159,414 65,000 - 224,414 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 4,772,380 3,806,413 5,027,356 3,551,437 143 TREE FUND 20,632 215,330 214,800 21,162 211 LID FUND CONTROL - - - - 231 2012 LTGO DEBTSERVICE FUND - 611,370 611,370 - 332 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 4,113,862 4,272,685 8,064,418 322,129 421 WATER 28,727,168 11,018,136 11,492,138 28,253,166 422 STORM 15,647,377 7,967,147 9,709,596 13,904,928 423 SEWER/TREATMENT PLANT 60,352,529 26,095,636 31,340,523 55,107,642 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 843,961 1,988,700 1,988,710 843,951 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 9,208,511 1,925,920 2,065,371 9,069,060 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,079,041 1,553,180 1,929,322 702,899 Totals 161,609,926 125,948,167 149,531,215 138,026,878 C N E C N E Q r N 7 m L d E N r Q d Cn CV CV O CV L N E C� sz d Cn CV CV O CV C d E t v R r r Q Packet Pg. 431 10.3.a EXHIBIT "B": Budget Amendments by Revenue (September 2022) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION Adopted Budget Ord. #4240 1/1/2022 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4249 3/1/2022 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4250 3/15/2022 Adopted Amendment Ord. #4257 4/26/2022 Proposed Amendment Ord. # 2022 Amended Revenue Budget 001 General Fund $ 44,204,863 $ (35,000) $ 470,845 $ $ 345,776 $ 44,986,484 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 225,000 - - 225,000 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund - 016 Building Maintenance Fund 119,645 119,645 017 Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund - 018 Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund 200,000 200,000 019 Edmonds Opioid Response Fund - - - 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 167,210 167,210 111 Street Fund 1,751,930 - 1,751,930 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 13,359,021 325,850 13,684,871 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 216,701 - 216,701 118 Memorial Street Tree - - 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 84,410 84,410 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,540 26,540 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,550 1,550 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 29,590 29,590 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 2,271,020 2,271,020 126 Special Capital Fund 2,261,030 2,261,030 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 82,750 82,750 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 182,430 182,430 136 Parks Trust Fund 4,330 4,330 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd 43,520 43,520 138 Sister City Commission 10,290 10,290 140 Business Improvement District Fund 79,349 79,349 141 Affordable and Supportive Housing Fund 65,000 65,000 142 Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 4,856,549 (1,050,136) 3,806,413 143 Tree Fund 215,330 215,330 211 Lid Fund Control - - 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service fund 611,370 - 611,370 332 Parks Construction 3,822,685 450,000 4,272,685 421 Water 11,018,136 - 11,018,136 422 Storm 8,277,897 (400,000) - 89,250 7,967,147 423 Sewer/Treatment Plant 16,001,340 8,818,743 1,275,553 26,095,636 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,988,700 - - 1,988,700 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,925,920 - 1,925,920 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,153,570 399,610 1,553,180 617 1 Firemen's Pension Fund - - - Totals $ 114,938,031 1 $ (235,000) $ 9,615,438 1 $ 119,645 1 $ 1,510,053 1 $ 125,948,167 C N E C N E Q r Ci) 7 m L d E N Q d Cn CV CV O CV N E C� sz d Cn CV CV 0 CV C d E t v R r Q Packet Pg. 432 10.3.a EXHIBIT "C": Budget Amendment by Expenditure (September 2022) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION Adopted Budget Ord.#4240 1/1/2022 Adopted Amendment Ord.#4249 3/1/2022 Adopted Amendment Ord.#4250 3/15/2022 Adopted Amendment Ord.#4257 Proposed Amendment Ord.# 2022 Amended Expenditure Budget 001 General Fund $ 49,246,551 $ (1,677) $ 126,661 $ 2,989,337 $ 558,717 $ 52,919,589 009 Leoff-MedlcaIIns. Reserve 260,490 - - 260,490 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - 25,000 25,000 012 Contingency Reserve Fund - - - 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,900 5,900 016 Building Maintenance Fund 980,000 (435,000) 545,000 017 Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund - - - 018 Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund 200,000 200,000 019 Edmonds Opioid Response Fund - - 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 45,800 - 45,800 111 Street Fund 2,254,676 61,104 2,315,780 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 12,542,946 325,850 - 12,868,796 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 181,880 13,500 195,380 118 Memorial Street Tree - - - 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 100,900 100,900 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,880 26,880 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 3,000 3,000 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 28,200 - 28,200 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 4,279,876 309,812 4,589,688 126 Special Capital Fund 1,922,273 561,394 2,483,667 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 78,400 - 78,400 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 220,561 - 220,561 136 Pa rks Trust Fund - 50,000 50,000 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd 25,000 - 25,000 138 Sister City Commission 11,900 11,900 140 Business Improvement District Fund 87,680 87,680 141 Affordable and Supportive Housing Fund - - - - 142 Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 1,250,000 4,727,492 100,000 (1,050,136) 5,027,356 143 Tree Fund 214,800 - - 214,800 211 Lid Fund Control - - 231 2012LTGO Debt Service Fund 611,370 - - 611,370 332 Parks Construction 7,321,018 293,400 - 450,000 8,064,418 421 Water 11,110,498 365,396 15,094 1,150 11,492,138 422 Storm 8,638,202 (400,000) 1,443,238 (61,791) 89,947 9,709,596 423 Sewer/Treatment Plant 15,656,812 13,855,689 17,355 1,810,667 31,340,523 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,988,710 - - - 1,988,710 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,942,460 - 7,911 115,000 2,065,371 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,447,422 91,600 - 390,300 1,929,322 617 Firemen Pension Fund - - - - - Totals $122,484,205 1 $ (201,677)1 $ 22,164,032 1 $ 2,694,010 1 $ 2,390,645 $ 149,531,215 C N E C N E Q r N 7 m L d E N r Q d CV CV O CV N E C� d Cn CV CV 0 CV C d E t v R r Q Packet Pg. 433 EXHIBIT "D": Budget Amendment Summary (September 2022) 10.3.a Fund Number Proposed Amendment Change in Revenue Proposed Amendment Change in Expense Proposed Amendment Change in Ending Fund Balance 001 345,776 558,717 (212,941) 011 - 25,000 (25,000) 142 (1,050,136) (1,050,136) 332 450,000 450,000 421 1,150 (1,150) 422 89,250 89,947 (697) 423 1,275,553 1,810,667 (535,114) 511 115,000 (115,000) 512 399,610 390,300 9,310 Total Change 1,510,053 1 2,390,645 (880,592) N E C N E Q N 7 m L d E N Q d to N N O N a+ Q Packet Pg. 434 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: This request is for additional funds needed to continue Temporary staffing to cover the workload while a person is on administrative leave. Because this is paid leave, we do not have salary savings to offset this expenditure. Finance hired a temporary consultant through Robert Half starting full-time at $60 per hour. The City has a standing contract with Robert Half. In April, Council approved a budget amendment which allowed for a consultant for three months, at a weekly rate of $2,400 ($60 per hour X 40 hours). We would like to ask for additional budget to be able to keep this person for another four months, through the end of 2022. Department: Administrative Services Fund Name: 001 GENERAL Division: Finance Title: Temporary Staff Preparer: Dave Turley Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 Professional Services $ 40,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ 40,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 40,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ 40,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - Packet Pg. 435 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: Many city public meetings, including meetings of boards and commissions, are being carried out primarily remotely, using the Zoom platform. For all public meetings, including those primarily over Zoom, the city is required to provide a physical location for people to attend the meeting. For the last several months we have utilized a room at the Waterfront Center for this purpose, but this room is no longer available. We would like to convert the two offices in the South East corner of the first floor of City Hall into a room that can be used for this purpose for a longer term basis. For this to be optimal, we would like to combine two offices, paint the room and make some minor repairs, and add a small amount of technological equipment to make this a functional meeting room. Department: Administrative Services Finance Fund MULTIPLE FUNDS Division: Title: Building modification Name: Dave Turlev Prenarer: Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider OEM 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating JIL Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Repair and Maintenance $ 25,000 $ - $ - S - $ - 512.000.31.594.18.64.00 IS Equipment $ 5,000 - - - - Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 30,000 $ - $ - S - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 512.000.333.21.019.00 Coronavirus Relief Fund / Technology $ 5,000 S - $ - S Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ 5,000 $ - $ - S Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 25,000 $ - $ - S - $ - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ 25,000 $ - $ - S Packet Pg. 436 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: This adjustment moves the cost of software for public records requests between departments. GovQA historically charged to different departments will be paid by Information Services and charged back to Departments. This is an accounting change with a net -zero cost. Department: Information Services Division: Administrative Services Fund MULTIPLE FUNDS Title: Public record request system maintenance Name: Preparer: Brian Tuley Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance On -Going Operating Fill out on -going costs & revenues Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 IS REPAIR & MAINTENANCE $ 27,950 $ 27,950 $ 27,950 $ 27,950 $ 27,950 001.000.31.514.31.48.00 CITY CLERK REPAIR & MAINTENANCE $ (27,950) $ (27,950) $ (27,950) $ (27,950) $ (27,950) Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 27,950 $ - $ - $ - $ - 512.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 27,950 - - - - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Packet Pg. 437 10.3.b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: Microsoft office 365 uses a subsection -based pricing model. The City subscription contract go through an annual review process termed a "true -up" which audits user counts versus licensing. Increasing staff and committee group numbers requires additional licensing. This decision package provides for the increased license counts need to cover existing user levels. Department: Information Services Division: Administrative Services Fund MULTIPLE FUNDS Title: Increases in Microsoft license counts and costs Name: Preparer: Brian Tuley Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance What is the nature of the expenditure? On -Going Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fill out on going costs & revenues Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 IS REPAIR & MAINTENANCE $ 18,760 $ 18,760 $ 18,760 $ 18,760 $ 18,760 001.000.62.524.20.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 381 $ 381 $ 381 $ 381 $ 381 001.000.31.514.31.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 001.000.61.557.20.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 5,888 $ 5,888 $ 5,888 $ 5,888 $ 5,888 001.000.11.511.60.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 466 $ 466 $ 466 $ 466 $ 466 001.000.23.512.51.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 42 $ 42 $ 42 $ 42 $ 42 001.000.62.524.10.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 001.000.67.518.21.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 890 $ 890 $ 890 $ 890 $ 890 001.000.31.514.23.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 001.000.39.522.20.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 169 $ 169 $ 169 $ 169 $ 169 001.000.22.518.10.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 212 $ 212 $ 212 $ 212 $ 212 001.000.21.513.10.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 127 $ 127 $ 127 $ 127 $ 127 001.000.64.571.22.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 2,499 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 001.000.41.521.10.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 3,135 $ 3,135 $ 3,135 $ 3,135 $ 3,135 001.000.62.558.60.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 424 $ 424 $ 424 $ 424 $ 424 001.000.65.518.20.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 1,417 $ 1,417 $ 1,417 $ 1,417 $ 1,417 423.000.75.535.80.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 533 $ 533 $ 533 $ 533 $ 533 422.000.72.531.90.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 351 $ 351 $ 351 $ 351 $ 351 421.000.74.534.80.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 579 $ 579 $ 579 $ 579 $ 579 423.000.76.535.80.45.11 INTERFUND RENTAL $ 636 $ 636 $ 636 $ 636 $ 636 Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ (16,661) $ (16,661) $ (16,661) $ (16,661) $ (16,661) 512.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 18,760 18,760 18,760 18,760 18,760 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance (1,169) (1,169) (1,169) (1,169) (1,169) 421.000.74.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance (579) (579) (579) (579) (579) 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance (351) (351) (351) (351 (351) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - Packet Pg. 438 10.3.b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Description: Remote work has become more prevalent and widespread throughout the enterprise. Working from home or remote locations introduces new vectors for bad actors to exploit. Unfortunately, municipalities have become a frequent target. New technology trends require new methods and tools to protect the enterprise from cyberthreats. This decision package implements tools that enhance security by better protecting workstations and providing visibility into network activity. Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Services Ive Services New Item For Council To Consider 100 % Ending Fund Balance On -Going Operating Fund MULTIPLE FUNDS Name: Fill out on -going costs & revenues Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Repair / Maintenance $ 18,500 $ 18,760 $ 18,760 $ 18,760 $ 18,760 001.000.62.524.20.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 376 $ 381 $ 381 $ 381 $ 381 001.000.31.514.31.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 334 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 001.000.61.557.20.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 5,807 $ 5,888 $ 5,888 $ 5,888 $ 5,888 001.000.11.511.60.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 460 $ 466 $ 466 $ 466 $ 466 001.000.23.512.51.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 41 $ 42 $ 42 $ 42 $ 42 001.000.62.524.10.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 328 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 001.000.67.518.21.43.11 Interfund Rental $ 877 $ 890 $ 890 $ 890 $ 890 001.000.31.514.23.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 334 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 $ 339 001.000.39.522.20.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 167 $ 169 $ 169 $ 169 $ 169 001.000.22.518.10.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 209 $ 212 $ 212 $ 212 $ 212 001.000.21.513.10.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 125 $ 127 $ 127 $ 127 $ 127 001.000.64.571.22.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 2,465 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 001.000.41.521.10.45.11 InterfundRental $ 3,091 $ 3,135 $ 3,135 $ 3,135 $ 3,135 001.000.62.558.60.43.11 Interfund Rental $ 418 $ 424 $ 424 $ 424 $ 424 001.000.65.518.20.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 1,398 $ 1,417 $ 1,417 $ 1,417 $ 1,417 423.000.75.535.80.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 526 $ 533 $ 533 $ 533 $ 533 422.000.72.531.90.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 346 $ 351 $ 351 $ 351 $ 351 421.000.74.534.80.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 571 $ 579 $ 579 $ 579 $ 579 423.000.76.535.80.45.11 Interfund Rental $ 627 $ 636 $ 636 $ 636 $ 636 Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ $ $ $ $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 1 2022 2023 2024 1 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ $ $ $ $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 16,430 $ 16,661 $ 16,661 $ 16,661 $ 16,661 512.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance 18,500 18,760 18,760 18,760 18,760 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance (1,153) (1,169) (1,169) (1,169) (1,169) 421.000.74.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance (571) (579) (579) (579) (579) 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance (346) (351) (351) (351) (351) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ $ $ $ $ Packet Pg. 439 September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) 10.3.b Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: The Ebb Tide Trial scheduled for October 2022 requires expert witnesses in various fields such as engineering and environmental firms. The City has contracted with several firms to provide that expert witness. Requesting expenditure authority necessary to support expert witness involvement in the trial as needed. Recreation and Human Services Division: jAdministration Title: I Ebb Tide Trial Expenses Preuarer: I Aneie Feser Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 1000/o Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Fund 001 GENERAL Name: Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 Professional Services $ 130,000 $ $ $ $ Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 130,000 $ $ $ $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ $ $ $ $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 130,000 $ $ $ $ Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ 130,000 $ I $ I $ $ Packet Pg. 440 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: Parks Maintenance exceeded the division's $10,000 Overtime budget allocation by mid -year due to lack of seasonal staff, the lack of an FTE for several months and service demand. An additional allocation is needed to cover costs through the second half of the year. Department: Parks, Recreation and Human Services Fund Name: 001 GENERAL Division: Parks Title: Park Maintenance Overtime Preparer: Angie Feser Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.64.576.80.12.00 Overtime $ 12,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 12,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ (12,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ (12,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - Packet Pg. 441 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that cities and counties update their Comprehensive Plans on a periodic schedule. The City of Edmonds' periodic update is due December 31, 2024. This periodic update will be an extensive update ofthe Comprehensive Plan addressing residential density; community character; housing affordability and displacement; equity and inclusion; environmental protection and climate change; economic development. A significant focus of the update will be a visioning and extensive community engagement, with a particular effort on inclusive outreach.The Department of Commerce has provided a $125,000 reimbursable grant to the City to assist with the Comprehensive Plan update. Half of the $125,000 ($62,500) is available on a reimbursment basis beginning July 1, 2022. This budget amendment is to begin accessing this funding source. Services Division: jPlanning Title: I Comprehensive Plan Undate Kernen Lien Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Fund 001 GENERAL Name: Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 00 1.000.62.558.60.4 1.00 Professional Services $ 62,500 $ - $ - S - $ - Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 62,500 $ - $ - S - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.334.00.000.00 State Grants - Budget Only $ 62,500 $ - $ - S - $ - Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ 62,500 S - $ - S - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 $ - S - $ - S - $ - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ - S - $ - S Packet Pg. 442 10.3.b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Description: The need for outside consultant plan review of building permits has exceeded the existing budget of $43,000 by over $50,000 due to increases in permitting activity and larger developments. Larger scale developments require a level of complexity that requires additional expertise in structural and non structural review. We anticipate additional consultant needs through the end of the year. However, the requested increase in funding will be recoverable by increased permit revenues. Services clonal Services orback Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Fund 001 GENERAL Name: Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 Professional Services $ 167,000 $ $ $ $ Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease' $ 167,000 $ $ $ $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 001.000.345.83.000.00 Permit Revenue $ 167,000 $ $ $ $ Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ 167,000 1 $ S S $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease' $ $ $ $ $ Packet Pg. 443 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: To provide Budget Authority for Small Claims to be paid from the Risk Fund Department: Human Resources Division: Risk Management Fund Olt RISK MANAGEMENT Title: Risk Fund Small Claims Name: RESERVE Preparer: Dave Turley Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance On -Going Operating Fill out on -going costs & revenues Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 011.000.39.518.61.49.00 Miscellaneous - Judgements & Settlements $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 011.000.39.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000) 10 Packet Pg. 444 10.3.b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: In 2022 Mayor Nelson approved a change order for additional work required by the PUD at City Park odor unit which was $83,191.51. The new screenings conveyor (May 2022 $223,048.53), ash thickener drive (March 2022, $121,220.44) and HKA Technology contract (to support the Carbon Recovery Project May 2022 $134,175.00) were presented to City Council and approved. Our prior public Works Director approved wetland survey work being completed by Landau to support the Carbon Recovery Project with totaled $18,800. Due to staff safety concerns a carport cover was purchased to cover the sludge trailers and loading operation for a total of 8730.99. The total of these additions to the CIP is $589,166.47. Department: Public Works Fund Name: J23 SEWER / TREATMENT PLANT Division: JWWTP Title: IWWTP CIP Amendment Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? 3 items were previously discussed in March and May of 2022 How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Capital Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.100.76.594.35.41.00 HJK and Landau $ 152,975 $ S $ $ 423.100.76.594.35.65.10 Thickener, Carport 129,951 423.100.76.594.35.65.00 Carbon Recovery Project 306,240 423.000.75.597.35.55.23 Intrafand Transfer to 423.100 299,220 Total Expenditure Increase(Decrease) $ 888,386 $ S $ $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.100.374.07.020.00 OVWS District $ 97,513 $ S $ $ 423.100.374.07.010.00 City of Mountlake Terrace 136,533 423.100.374.07.030.00 City of Shoreline 55,900 423.100.397.38.423.20 Intrafund Transfer from 423.000 299,220 Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ 589,166 $ S S S Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ (299,220) S S $ $ Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ 299,220 $ I S I $ I $ 11 Packet Pg. 445 10.3.b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: In early January the WWTP experienced a peak flow event which caused severe flooding of the 400 building. Due to regulatory and potential enviornmentatl impacts the repairs had to begin immediately. All the equipment in the 400 building has been assessed and repaired if possible. Some equipment had to be replaced or is still on order. We are awaiting final assessment on our Genie Lift. We are hoping to have repaired as opposed to replaced due to the long lead time. The final piece will be the detailed cleaning of the area which we have a quote for. An insurance claim has been filed and our deductible is $25,000. Public Works Division: WWTP Title: WWTP O&M Budget Amendment Preparer: Pamela Randolph Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider Jan 22 flood and increased sludge hauling 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Fund I 423 SEWER / TREATMENT Name: PLANT Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Flooding Damages $ 444,959 $ - $ - $ - $ - 423.000.76.535.80.46.00 Flooding Deductable 25,000 - - - - Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 469,959 $ - $ - $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.000.343.50.300.00 OVWS District 14.08% $ 3,520 $ - $ - $ - $ - 423.000.343.50.400.00 City of Mountlake Terrace 29.47% 7,368 - - - - 423.000.343.50.500.00 City of Shoreline 12.54% 3,135 - - - - 423.000.372.10.000.00 Insurance reimbursement 419,959 - - - - Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ 433,982 $ - $ - $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ (35,977) $ - $ Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) 1$ (35,977) $ -1 $ - $ - $ - 12 Packet Pg. 446 10.3.b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: The budget amendment is due to the carbon recovery project being extended. There have some some reductions in the O&M expenses (due to significant under staffing and the ability to perform repair and maintenance work) that will offset the total estimated hauling expenses this year. We anticipate the increase in budget authority to be $450,000. Public Works Division: WWTP Title: WWTP O&M Budget Amendment Preparer: Pamela Randolph Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider Increase sludge hauling 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Fund I 423 SEWER / TREATMENT Name: PLANT Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Increased Sludge hauling expense $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ Total Expenditure Increase Decrease $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.000.343.50.300.00 OVWS District 14.08% $ 63,360 $ - $ - $ - $ - 423.000.343.50.400.00 City of Mountlake Terrace 29.47% 132,615 - - - - 423.000.343.50.500.00 City of Shoreline 12.54% 56,430 - - - - Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ 252,405 $ - $ - $ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ (197,595) $ - $ Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) $ (197,595)1 $ 13 Packet Pg. 447 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: Due to high fuel prices there is a need for $40,000 additional for Diesel fuel and $75,000 additional for regular unleaded gas. Department: Fleet Maintenance Division: Fund MULTIPLE FUNDS Title: Increased Fuel Costs Name: Preparer: Carl Rugg Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 Fuel - Diesel $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 Fuel - Regular Unleaded 75,000 - - - - Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ 115,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 511.000.77.508.00.00.00 Ending Fund Balance $ 115,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ 115,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 14 Packet Pg. 448 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: This decision package moves designated ARPA budget to the accounts from which the expenditures will be made through the end of 2022. OpenGov - $394,610 ARPA Grant Contractors - $70,000 Datafy - $12,456 Hiatt Consulting - $11,820 Uptown Market - $22,000 Green Streets Conceptual Designs - $89,250 Finance Division: Title: 12022 ARPA Budget Prenarer: IMarissa Cain Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) New Item For Council To Consider 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Operating IM Fund I MULTIPLE FUNDS Name: Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 00 1.000.61.558.70.4 1.00 Professional Services $ 24,276 $ - $ - S - $ - 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Repair & Maintenance 394,610 - - - - 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Professional Services 22,000 - - - - 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 Professional Services 70,000 - - - - 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 Capital Professional Services 89,250 - - - - 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Community Relief Funds 600,136 - - - - Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - S Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 202.5 2026 142.000.333.21.019.00 Coronavirus Relief Fund $ 600,136 $ - $ - S - $ - 001.000.333.21.019.00 Coronavirus Relief Fund 116,276 - - - - 422.000.333.21.019.00 Coronavirus Relief Fund 89,250 - - - - 512.000.333.21.019.00 Coronavirus Relief Fund 394,610 - - - - Total Revenue Increase Decrease $ - $ - $ - S Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 $ - S - $ - S Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ - S - $ - S 15 Packet Pg. 449 10.3. b September Budget Amendment for Council to Consider (September 2022) Budget Amendment for: September 13, 2022 Item Description: On September 7, 2022 City Council authorized the allocation of up to $450,000 of ARPA funding to construct the 96th Avenue Stormwater Mitigation project as required for the completion of Civic Center Playfields Park project. Although tied to the Civic Park project, this is a stormwater project located in public right-of-way and therefore, qualifies for Federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding. Currently, city revenues are allocated for this stormwater project but by using ARPA funding, those dollars can be used for additional costs related to Civic Park and other park capital projects. Department: Parks Fund Name: 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND Division: Title: Civic Park Mitigation Project Preparer: Marissa Budget Amendment Type Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? How is this amendment funded? What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Previously Discussed By Council Sep 6 2022 100% Ending Fund Balance One -Time Capital Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 332.000.64.594.76.65.00 Parks Construction $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 Community Relief Funds (450,000) - - - - Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 332.000.333.21.019.00 Coronavirus Relief Fund $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 142.000.333.21.019.00 Coronavirus Relief Fund (450,000) - - - - Total Revenue Increase (Decrease) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Account Number Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 16 Packet Pg. 450 10.3.c Growth Management Act 2023-24 Periodic Update Grants Application Form E Overview and Instructions Q w 3 m 2024 Scheduled Jurisdictions: E King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties, and N cities within these counties RCW 36.70A.130(5)(a) Application Deadline: September 30, 2022 Local Government Division Growth Management Services Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 1 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 451 10.3.c This page is intentionally left blank Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 2 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 452 10.3.c Growth Management Services GMA Periodic Update Grants 2021-2023 Biennium Grant Application Overview and Instructions Part I: OVERVIEW OF THE UPDATE GRANT This information is for county and city governments applying for a Department of Commerce (Commerce), Growth Management Services, grant to assist with meeting the requirements of RCW 36.70A.130(5). Currently this the application round is open for King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties, and the cities within those counties, which must review, and if needed, revised their comprehensive plans and development regulations by June 30, 2024. Commerce update grant funding will be available for two years prior to the statutory deadline. Therefore, additional update grant funding rounds will be open for additional counties and cities, based on the statutory update deadline scheduled under RCW 36.70A.130(5). Jurisdictions with an update deadline of December 31, 2024: The initial round of update grant funding will be available for King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties, and the cities within those counties. The first year of funding will be available to reimburse comprehensive plan and development regulation review and update work from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Commerce will continue to work with your jurisdiction in Spring 2023 to prepare your second grant application, for the remaining 50% of funding, available July 1, 2023. Jurisdictions with an update deadline of June 30, 2025: Commerce will contact 2025 jurisdictions in Spring 2023 with further information and their update grant application. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 3 of 16 rev.06/22 E Q w m L E r N N O N Packet Pg. 453 10.3.c Frequently Asked Questions: What is the See RCW 36.70A.130(5): Counties and cities shall take action to review deadline to and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development review and regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the update its requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA) as follows: comprehensive plan and (a) On or before December 31, 2024, and every ten years thereafter, development for King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and the cities regulations? within those counties. (b) On or before June 30, 2025, and every ten years thereafter, for Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Lewis, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties. (c) On or before June 30, 2026, and every ten years thereafter, for Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Franklin, Kittitas, Skamania, Spokane, Walla Walla, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties. (d) On or before June 30, 2027, and every ten years thereafter, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties. How much As in prior update grant rounds, the funding will be awarded based on grant funding population size for jurisdictions. This information will be provided in your will we be award letter and posted on the Commerce, Growth Management Services eligible to webpage. receive? When are grant September 30, 2022. As soon as we receive a completed application we applications will begin to immediately prepare and finalize your grant agreement. So due? applications may be submitted as soon as possible. Do we need to No. All jurisdictions are eligible for funding. You will receive an award apply for grant letter that outlines the available grant funds for your jurisdictions, based on funding through formula for population size. a competitive process? Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 4 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 454 10.3.c How soon will As soon as the grant agreements are signed and based on the agreed the funds be upon Budget and Scope of Work, invoice vouchers may be submitted for available and reimbursement as soon as possible. We will provide further instructions when can we be once the agreements are finalized. reimbursed? What activities This grant can be used to cover most activities related to the review and may be funded update of the comprehensive plan and development regulations per the by this grant? requirements of RCW 36.70A.130. Examples of eligible expenditures include, but are not limited to, staff time, consultant contracts, costs of providing public notice, printing, and copying. Eligible costs must be incurred during the grant period. Any work performed prior to execution of this agreement will not be paid for with Commerce update funds. This grant may not be used to make capital purchases or to repay debt. How will grant Grantees will be reimbursed based on performance under the grant funds be contract and completion of the actions and deliverables outlined in the disbursed? scope of work. Invoices will be provided by Commerce for the grantee to sign and submit for reimbursement. Periodic status reports and deliverables will be established, and these will be the bases for Commerce to review and monitor progress, and approve grant payment or partial payment. Due to state law, and the end of the biennial budget on June 30, 2023, the first 50% of grant funding under this first year will need to be spent by that date. Unfortunately, any unspent state grant funds may not be carried over into the next fiscal year/biennium. What is needed Two items are needed to apply: to apply? (1) A completed update grant application; and (2) A letter of support from the mayor (for cities and towns); or the county executive or the chair of the board of county commissioners (for counties), supporting the work to be done as funded by this grant. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 5 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 455 10.3.c How should Electronic versions may be sent to gmsgrants(q)_commerce. wa.gov. grant applications be submitted to Commerce? When will Commerce will award these grants as soon as possible after receiving a Commerce completed application. We will communicate with the jurisdictions and send the grant send a final draft contract to the jurisdiction by Email for signature. It is our contract? intent to send contracts to all applicants as soon as possible. Grant funding will reimburse any project work and costs incurred as of July 1, 2022. So grantee jurisdictions may proceed with their update work now. Will we need to No. Commerce will assist you with finalizing and updating your grant re -apply for the Scope or Work and Budget for the second half of the funding. Because second half of the grant crosses the state biennial budgets, authorization and funding will our grant need to be re -authorized by the state Legislature in the next session and funding in July under the next 2023-25 Biennial budget. However, Commerce will work 2023? directly with jurisdictions to streamline the new contract preparation and execution. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 6 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 456 10.3.c Part II: APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS These instructions will help applicants fill out the application form necessary for this GMA Update grant from the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce), Growth Management Services. Reading these instructions prior to filling -out the application form will help assure that each question is answered clearly and with sufficient detail to meet the grant criteria. E In addition to these instructions, prospective grant applicants are encouraged to read Part I above "Overview of The Update Grant". The Overview provides information about grant E eligibility requirements, eligible activities, deadline, award amounts, etc. a� We request applications be submitted by September 30, 2022. If you will need additional time m to complete your application, please contact your assigned Senior Planner with Growth Management Services, as outlined in your award letter. E a� r a� N N Section 1: Proposal Request N Please give a brief description of your grant proposal. (50 words or less) Provide a brief description of the update grant proposal, including the focus of your work, which parts of the update you will focus on, and how you intend to spend update grant funds This provides Commerce with helpful information regarding how you intend to spend your update grand funding. Section 2: Jurisdiction Information Applying Jurisdiction Please state the name of the local government entity that will serve as the Grantee for the update grant. The grantee%ontractor will assume the responsibility to oversee the grant and assure compliance with the stipulations of the grant contract. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 7 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 457 10.3.c Grantee / Contractor Provide contact information for the person who will be the Representative primary point of contact with Commerce for this grant. Usually this person is the lead staff member, project manager or assigned representative staff for managing the grant. You may list two staff members, if that is preferable. Financial Contact Please provide name and contact information for the person who will be a contact person, if needed, for financial/accounting or grant reimbursement questions. This may be the same as your Contract/Grant Representative. UBI Number (Unified Business Identifier Number) For businesses in Washington state, the 9-digit Washington Unified Business Identifier (UBI) number is a handy thing. Your UBI number works across WA state agencies. Your accounting/finance officer should be able to provide this number. Please contact us if you have any questions. Statewide Vendor (SWV) The SWV number is required for electronic fund Number transfer/direct deposit. Please check with your accounting office. Information on verifying or obtaining an SWV number is available at: https://ofm. wa. pov/it-systems/accounting- systems/statewide-vendorpayee-services/statewide- vendor-number-lookup Contract Signature This the person to include on the signature line for signing Authority the agreement on behalf of your county or city? For most jurisdictions this is the designated official for your organization, such as the mayor. It may be a designated administrative officer, such as the city or county manager, depending on your jurisdiction's internal policies and structure. Please provide the Name and Title as it should appear under the signature line: Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 8 of 16 rev.06/22 c a� E c a� E a a m L a� N N O N c 0 U L Q a a 'L^ V d Q. U E E 0 V CO) N N O N r- M E U 2 a Packet Pg. 458 10.3.c Consultant / Subgrantee / Do you intend to hire a consultant/subcontractor for work Subonctractor under this project and compensate with available Commerce grant funds? If so please provide the name of the consultant. If you don't have that available, you mean answer "Yes'; "No'; "Undecided" Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 9 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 459 10.3.c Section 3: GMA Compliance Status/Background Information This is general GMA background information and compliance status information we are collecting from grantees. If you have any questions, please contact us. 3.1 Does your jurisdiction have an adopted comprehensive plan, critical areas ordinance and/or, where applicable, a natural resources lands ordinance? ❑ YES ❑ NO 3.2 Has your jurisdiction adopted other necessary development regulations under the GMA, including ordinances for subdivision of land, controls on the location and intensity of development (i.e., zoning codes) and critical areas? ❑ YES ❑ NO 3.3 Are there any current non-compliance decision or orders before the Growth Management Hearings Board and/or courts? ❑ YES ❑ NO 3.4 If your answer in Question 3.3 above is "Yes", please give a brief description of you're the case and currents status of this petition or appeal. (Please include any relevant Board case number or court case number) Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 10 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 460 10.3.c Section 4: Scope of Work This section provides information about the project, its proposed schedule and the final product it will generate. The applicant must prepare the following "Scope of Work", which will be reviewed and included with your grant agreement. c a� E On the application form, the Scope of Work (SOW) is arranged in four columns: E 1. The first column will identify your Tasks / Action / Deliverables column in your project work plan. You may expand the SOW to include as many Tasks, Descriptions and -� Deliverables as you need. If you have questions please feel free to contact us for help. m L • "Tasks" and "Actions" are brief titles for the work activities that this particular E portion of the project entails. Actions need an estimated start date and an �. estimated end date. If only a month and year are given, we will assume that the in estimated start date is the first day of the first month and the estimated end date o is the last day of the last month. "Deliverables" are the final products that the grant and/or portion of the grant will generate. The applicant will need to deliver these products on the dates indicated in the "End Date" column. "Description" should be a one or two sentence description or summary of the work anticipated. 2. The second column is for the description of the element. 3. The third column is for estimated end date for each deliverable. For progress reporting, we recommend proposing deliverables throughout the SOW, rather than listing all on the end date, June 30, 2023. (For example you may submit drafts and final copies.) Commerce Periodic Update Checklist: The Commerce Periodic Update Checklist will be a required deliverable for all update grantees. You should include that as an early deliverable in your work plan and Scope of Work. You may find links to the Commerce 2022 Periodic Update Checklists on our periodic update resources webpage: https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving-communities/growth- management/periodic-update/ Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 11 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 461 10.3.c Performance -based contracts: Our goal is to follow a deliverables -based contract, in which we are tracking reimbursements with completion and submittal of deliverables, following a performance -based contract model. We will work with you to finalize your SOW and Budget to best meet your project and reimbursement needs and Commerce grant progress reporting requirements. 4.1 Current 2022 Scope of Work template Instructions: Please list the Tasks and Deliverables that correspond to your work plan for this upcoming fiscal year 2022. Please note, this should only include 50% of your total grant award, for this fiscal year. Sample Scope of Work - Provided for general format assistance only: Tasks/ Description End Date Actions/ Deliverables Task 1.0 Review relevant plans and regulations to determine if March 31, 2023 there are any sections that need revision. Action 1.1 Review the comprehensive plan using the Commerce December 31, periodic update checklist 2014 Action 1.2 Review the development regulations, including the March 31, 2022 critical areas regulations using the Commerce periodic update checklist. Deliverable Completed Commerce periodic update checklists for March 31, 2023 1.1 comprehensive plan and development regulations. Task 2.0 Review relevant plans and regulations to determine if June 30, 2023 there are any sections that need revision. Action 2.1 Review the development regulations using the December 31, Commerce periodic update checklist 2022 Action 2.2 Public input and comment on proposed amendments March 31, 2023 and updates. Deliverable Draft staff report of proposed update, or Draft June 30, 2023 1.1 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, or ... Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 12 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 462 10.3.c 4.2 Estimated 2023 SCODe of Work temDlate Please list Tasks/Action and Deliverables that correspond your estimated Scope of Work for next year. Please note, this should only include the remaining 50% of your total grant award, for Year 2 or SFY 2023 (July 1, 2023 — June 30, 2024). We realize this estimate may be adjusted prior to your next grant agreement, next year, and it is currently intended to provide a proposed outline to assist with our grant planning. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 13 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 463 10.3.c Section 5: Proposed Grant Budget / Funding Information 5.1 Funding/Expenses This section provides information about the project's cost, other funding sources, and impact on other contracts and obligations. c a� Below is a description of each of the categories. This description includes the relevant lines from the Budget, Accounting, and Reporting System (BARS) manual used by your local government finance department in your city or county budget. The BARS manual information is a included to assist you in categorizing grant costs. Please note that the State Fiscal Year is July 1 to June 30 and may not be the same as your jurisdiction's fiscal year. ; m L • Salaries and Benefits: These are your costs to pay for your staff time on this grant. a� • Goods and Supplies: This is the estimated cost of the office supplies that will be N needed to complete this grant. N N O N • Professional Services: This line is for the cost of any work that you are using private N consultants to complete. o • Other Goods and Services: This is for the estimated costs of such items as printing, advertising, training, and travel. Please complete the revenue portion of the budget table to reflect how the funding sources will be used to pay for activities and deliverables in the Statement of Work. For the Commerce grant funds line, please insert the amounts requested from Commerce. The balance needs to be provided by the local government. The total revenue dedicated to the completion of this grant needs to match the total expenditures necessary to complete the work. Note: Due to state law, all state funds that are disbursed to your local government under this grant need to be spent on eligible activities by the end of the state fiscal year in which they were issued. Local governments are not allowed to carry unexpended funds past that date. The budget table represents State Fiscal Year 2022 and 2023. The total expenses and total revenues in this column must be the same within each state fiscal year. We are aware that state and local fiscal years are not on the same schedule; however, state law requires strict adherence to the state fiscal year for state contracts. 5.2 Proposed 2022 Budget template Please list the Deliverables that correspond to the proposed Scope of Work and propose your cost per Deliverable. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 14 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 464 10.3.c Reminder: This should only include 50% of your total grant award, for this fiscal year. You may expand this table as needed to add more Deliverables. 5.3 Estimated 2023 Budget template Please list the Deliverables that correspond to the proposed Scope of Work and propose your cost per Deliverable. Reminder: This should only include 50% of your total grant award, for SFY 2023 (July 1, 2023 — June 30, 2024). We realize this estimate may be adjusted prior to your next grant agreement, next year, and it is currently intended to provide a proposed outline to assist with our grant planning. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 15 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 465 10.3.c Application Submittal: Please submit your completed (1) Application Form and (2) Letter of Support. We request your materials be submitted electronically as an attachment to an e-mail to the gmsgrant commerce.wa.gov Email format: Please enter your jurisdiction name and "Update Grant Application" in the subject line. Example: Update Grant Application -[Jurisdiction Name] Attachments to e-mail shall be in Microsoft Word format or PDF. Scanned copies of letters are acceptable. We request a copy of the grant application form be submitted in MS Word format. (A PDF copy may also be attached if you prefer.) Receiving a Word copy of the application form with Scope of Work and Budget tables, allows us to more quickly prepare your contract template. If you have any questions, please contact your Commerce Regional Assistance Planner. Additional information, including contact details, will be available in your update grant award I ette r. Grant Application Instructions for the 2022-23 Periodic Update Grant Page 16 of 16 rev.06/22 Packet Pg. 466 10.3.d STATE o� x 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1011 Plum Street SE • PO Box 42525 • Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 • (360) 725-4000 www.commerce.wa.gov July 18, 2022 The Honorable Mike Nelson Mayor of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue N Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: 2024 Growth Management Act Periodic Update Grants Dear Mayor Nelson: The City of Edmonds is required by RCW 3 6.70A. 13 0(5)(a) to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations by June 30, 2024, to ensure they comply with the Growth Management Act (GMA). We are pleased to inform you that, based on your population size, that $125,000 has been reserved for the City of Edmonds as a grant to assist in completing your update work. This funding is reserved for the city as a non-competitive formula grant. Due to the state biennial split, one-half of this funding, or $62,500 is available to reimburse related periodic update project costs from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023. Commerce will sign a grant agreement with you by this fall. All related GMA update project costs incurred by your jurisdiction, beginning July 1, 2022, will be eligible for reimbursement. Therefore, you will not need to delay work on the update grant until the contract is signed. In addition to this financial assistance, Growth Management Services will continue to provide technical assistance for you during this periodic update process, until your scheduled update deadline, and our professional senior planners are ready to assist you with any questions. Please feel free to contact your assigned senior planner with any questions. Your first grant deliverable will be the completion and submittal of the periodic update checklist, which we provide for review for your comprehensive plan and development regulation. You may find a copy of the checklist and instructions on our webpage here: https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving-communities/growth-mana eg ment/periodic-update/ In order to receive this funding, please complete the GMA Update Grant Application materials. These materials are located on the Growth Management Services grants webpage located at Packet Pg. 467 10.3.d htips://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving-communities/growth-mana eg ment/growth-mana e grants/ We request application materials please be returned by September 30, 2022. As soon we receive your submitted application, we will begin preparing your contract and negotiate your final scopes of work. If you have questions regarding this grant program or receiving technical assistance regarding your update, please contact Kirsten Larsen, at (360) 280-0320, or kirsten.larsen@commerce.wa.gov. Sincerely, Dave Andersen, AICP Managing Director, Growth Management Services cc: Kernen Lien Packet Pg. 468 10.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Award Construction Contract for the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On June 14, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to a future City Council meeting for possible approval. On July 26, 2022 staff presented this item to City Council to request a rejection of all bids. On September 13, 2022 staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the September 20, 2022 for approval. The Committee supported the project and recommended the construction contract move forward for approval with a 5-minute City Council presentation for public information. Staff Recommendation Award a construction contract to WSB Excavation & Utilities, LLC in the amount of $373,941 and authorized a management reserve of $74,788 for changes and unforeseen conditions. Narrative This project will expand the capacity of an existing infiltration facility located at Seaview Park by adding an additional row of underground injection wells beneath a stormwater dispersion chamber and connecting it to the existing stormwater drainage system. Major project elements include excavation and backfill for storm pipe, catch basins, a stormwater pre-treatment structure, HMA pavement restoration, infiltration well construction, and connection to existing stormwater system. All bids were rejected for the initial June 28th, 2022 bid opening. Revisions were made to project bid documents and the project was re -advertised for bids on August 16th, 2022. Project bid opening was conducted on September 6th, 2022 and the City received three bids that ranged from a low of $373,941 to a high of $531,821. The engineer's estimate was $344,555. A review of the bidder's record and qualifications has been completed and the responses are positive. Attachment 2 are the bid results. Project costs are being funded by a Department of Ecology Stormwater Grant and the 422 Stormwater Utility Fund. Attachment 3 is the proposed construction budget to complete the project. Construction is expected to begin in October and be complete by January. Packet Pg. 469 10.4 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Seaview Phase 2 Project Map Attachment 2 - Bid Summary Attachment 3 - Proposed Construction Budget Packet Pg. 470 City of Edmonds Maabook 10.4.b CITY OF EDMONDS rst. ,g90 PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 PROJECT No.: EOFA Bid Summary Bid Date: 09/06/2022 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $353,000.00 CONTRACTOR BID Total I WSB Excavation & Utilities, LLC $ 373,941.00 2 Strider Construction Co., Inc. $ 419,677.00 3 Rodarte Construction, Inc. $ 531,821.00 m r Q Packet Pg. 472 10.4.c Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 Proposed Construction Budget Description Amount Contract Award $ 373,941 Contract Award Management Reserve (20%) $ 74,788 Construction Management, Inspection & Testing (20%) $ 74,788 1 % Arts (Non -grant portion of project) $ 935 Total = $ 524,452 Funding Amount Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $ 160,252 Grant - Department of Ecology $ 364,200 Total Funds Available = $ 524,452 Packet Pg. 473 10.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/20/2022 Edmonds City Attorney Contract Extension Staff Lead: Council President Olson Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History In 2019, Council approved the current contract with Lighthouse for legal representation for the City of Edmonds. At that time, Council concluded -based on direct input obtained from individual Councilmembers and members of the Administration -there was general satisfaction with the quality of the legal work being performed by Lighthouse. There was also general consensus by internal clients that the city is receiving good value for its investment via the flat rate billing structure by Lighthouse. For these reasons, a new three year contract with Lighthouse was entered into by the city on December 31, 2019. This contract for legal services between Lighthouse Law Group (Lighthouse) and the City of Edmonds is in the final year of the three year term and expires on December 31, 2022. Council must take action to either enter into a new 3 year contract with Lighthouse commencing on January 1, 2023 or go through a more robust evaluation of our approach to legal services. Noting that it has been 12 years since we have done this more robust evaluation, Council will consider and ultimately vote whether or not it chooses to do that after the initial stakeholder evaluations of our current legal representation is completed. Workload associated with this, the budget, council vacancies, and routine City business have been evaluated and it has been determined that it would be a real challenge to do a good job on this project without the breathing room of a one year extension. Recommendation: Approve the proposed extension of the current Lighthouse contract for a 12 month period ending on December 31, 2023 to provide additional time for Council to evaluate current legal services and/or to pursue a more robust evaluation of our approach to legal services. Recommendation Approve the proposed extension of the current Lighthouse contract for a 12 month period ending on December 31, 2023 to provide additional time for Council to evaluate current legal services and/or to pursue a more robust evaluation of our approach to legal services. Narrative Since the city has not requested bids for legal representation for the past two contract cycles with Lighthouse and with total years without re -competing being over 10, some think it prudent that this step be taken now to ensure the city is continuing to receive strong value. This 12 month extension will provide adequate time for Council to do its due diligence in determining the optimal course to obtain legal representation for the city. In any of the possible scenarios, it would be a crunch to get the work done by the current contract's Packet Pg. 474 10.5 expiration date of 12/31/2022. To provide more ease and flexibility, the Council President has asked Lighthouse to put together and provide a one year contract extension for Council consideration. The proposed 2023 flat fee contract amount found as an attachment to this memo is based on our pre- existing 2022 flat fee contract with them adjusted by the Seattle area August to August CPI-U Index of 9%. The hourly rates in the proposed agreement (which only come into effect in the event of termination by the City during the one year contract term) are based on the CPI-U adjustment to the hourly rates that Lighthouse is charging the Cities of Maple Valley and Clyde Hill in 2022. Attachments: 2022-09-15 proposed Lighthouse contract with Edmonds Agenda Packet Items for 2019-11-26 meeting Pages from 2019-11-26 City Council - Full Minutes-2461 Packet Pg. 475 10.5.a AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT entered into between the City of Edmonds ("the City") and Lighthouse Law Group PLLC ("LIGHTHOUSE") effective January 1, 2023, is entered into in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1. Services to be Provided. LIGHTHOUSE will serve as attorneys for the City on all civil legal matters assigned or referred to LIGHTHOUSE by the City during the term of this Agreement, and will perform all civil legal services for the City with the exception of litigation covered by the City's insurance pool, litigation defended under an accepted tender arrangement, and legal services related to the issuance of any municipal bond or similar security. This is a nonexclusive agreement and the City at its sole discretion may engage other legal counsel regarding any service that is expected to be provided by LIGHTHOUSE. Examples of such services expected to be provided by LIGHTHOUSE include, but are not limited to: 1.1 Preparing for and attending meetings of the City Council and City Council Committees, if applicable, as necessary or requested to do so; 1.2 Drafting ordinances, resolutions, and decisions; 1.3 Answering telephone calls from City elected officials and staff and providing general consultation on civil legal matters; 1.4 Attending meetings with City staff (including regular office hours if requested), the Mayor, and/or Council Members on civil legal matters; 1.5 Attending meetings of other City boards and commissions, such as the Planning Board and Hearing Examiner, when requested to do so; and 1.6 Negotiating with third parties other than in a litigation context, e.g., negotiating interlocal agreements. 1.7 Representing the City and its officials in litigation matters, provided, that in cases where the City and its officials have insurance coverage through WCIA or another insurer, LIGHTHOUSE will represent the City and its officials only until WCIA retained attorneys are actively handling the case or to the extent necessary to deal with non -covered claims or to provide consultation and coordination between the City and the WCIA retained attorneys; 1.8 Labor negotiation or arbitration; 1.9 Services related to local improvement districts; Packet Pg. 476 10.5.a 1.10 Services related to taxation; 1.11 Services requiring expertise in CERCLA, MTCA, or other state or federal environmental cleanup laws; 1.12 Representing the City in administrative proceedings before another governmental unit (such as Boundary Review Board hearings, proceedings before the State Shoreline Hearings Board, or proceedings before the State Growth Management Hearings Board); 1.13 Telecommunications services, including franchise negotiation and leasing; and 1.14 Office hours at City Hall will be provided by LIGHTHOUSE as requested. 2. Personnel Performing Services. Jeff Taraday will be the lead attorney and shall have the primary responsibility for attending City Council meetings and delegating work to other LIGHTHOUSE attorneys as needed. Mr. Taraday may assign work to any attorney affiliated with LIGHTHOUSE. Provision of service by any other attorney shall require prior approval by the Mayor with notification provided to the Council of such assignment and approval. 3. Payment for Services. a. Except as provided in Section 3.b, below, during the year 2023, the City will pay LIGHTHOUSE for the services specified in Section 1 the sum of Fifty-eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Nine Dollars ($58,809) a month (the flat fee). b. If any of the Option Triggering Events described in Section 3.c, below, occur, LIGHTHOUSE shall have the option to convert the flat fee compensation arrangement described in Section 3.a, above, to an hourly compensation arrangement. If exercised by LIGHTHOUSE, this option will have the effect of applying the hourly rates described in Section 3.d, below to all of the work performed by LIGHTHOUSE, including work that was performed prior to the Option Triggering Event, subject to the retroactive billing cap described in Section 3.e, below. LIGHTHOUSE shall have the ability to exercise this option, if triggered, at any time after the Option Triggering Event occurs by sending written notice to the City of its decision to exercise the option. If the option is exercised, LIGHTHOUSE shall send the City invoices that reflect the additional hourly charges owing after crediting the flat fee payments previously made by the City. c. Any of the following shall constitute Option Triggering Events for the purposes of triggering the option in Section 3.b, above: i. The City terminates or provides notice of an intent to terminate the Agreement with LIGHTHOUSE; ii. The City selects a firm other than LIGHTHOUSE to serve as City Attorney; or iii. The City approves an in-house City Attorney position. Termination of the Agreement by LIGHTHOUSE shall not constitute an Option Triggering Event. d. The hourly rates below shall apply to the hourly invoices that will be paid by the City if LIGHTHOUSE exercises the option described in Section 3.b, above. • Jeff Taraday $367 • Tom Brubaker $367 • Mike Bradley $367 Packet Pg. 477 10.5.a • Sharon Cates $276 • Patricia Taraday $276 • Angela Tinker $276 • Beth Ford $276 • any other attorney $276 e. If LIGHTHOUSE exercises the option described in Section 3.b, above, the total number of months that LIGHTHOUSE may convert retroactively to hourly billing is limited to not more than eight months, PROVIDED THAT retroactive billing shall not apply to any work performed prior to January 1, 2023. 4. Awards of Attorneys Fees. If the City prevails in a legal matter and the tribunal awards reasonable attorneys fees to the City as the prevailing party, the hourly rates in Section 3.d, above shall apply for the purposes of calculating such fee award. These rates shall also be used where the City is able to charge a third -party (e.g. a real estate developer) for work performed by LIGHTHOUSE. Upon receipt of a fee award, the City shall keep the entire award PROVIDED THAT in cases initiated by the City including abatement actions, utility lien foreclosures, and other matters involving collection of a debt that is less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars, any attorneys fee award shall be paid to LIGHTHOUSE. 5. The City will not be charged separately for normal clerical or secretarial work, the expense of which has been calculated into LIGHTHOUSE's flat fee. Reimbursement will be made by the City for expenditures related to fees paid to a mediator, expert witness fees, court costs and fees, copying, postage, process service and courier costs. Other expenses shall be reimbursed when authorized in advance by the City. 6. Billing. The City shall pay the amount of the flat fee to LIGHTHOUSE within five calendar days of the last day of the month for which the legal services have been rendered. It shall not be necessary for LIGHTHOUSE to send an invoice for the flat fee to be paid. For informational purposes only, LIGHTHOUSE will send a detailed monthly description of the services rendered during the past month along with the amount that those services would cost the City in the event those services are billed on an hourly basis pursuant to Section 3.b, above. If LIGHTHOUSE exercises the option in Section 3.b, above, then it shall invoice according to that section. 7. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2023 and shall remain in effect through December 31, 2023. Either party may terminate the Agreement for any reason upon sixty (60) days notice. In the event of termination, work in progress will be completed by LIGHTHOUSE if authorized by the City under terms acceptable to both parties. If completion of work in progress is not authorized or acceptable terms cannot be worked out, LIGHTHOUSE will submit all unfinished documents, reports, or other material to City and LIGHTHOUSE will be entitled to receive payment for any and all satisfactory work completed prior to the effective date of termination. If the effective date of termination falls in the middle of a month, the flat fee shall be prorated accordingly, as applicable. Packet Pg. 478 10.5.a 8. Professional Liability Insurance. LIGHTHOUSE will maintain professional liability insurance throughout the duration of this Agreement in the minimum amount of $2,000,000. 9. Discrimination. LIGHTHOUSE agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment or any other person in the performance of this Agreement because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age, or physical, mental or sensory handicap, except where a bona fide occupational qualification exists. 10. Independent Contractor. LIGHTHOUSE is an independent contractor with respect to the services to be provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be liable for, nor obligated to pay to LIGHTHOUSE, or any employee of LIGHTHOUSE, sick leave, vacation pay, overtime or any other benefit applicable to employees of the City, nor to pay or deduct any social security, income tax, or other tax from the payments made to LIGHTHOUSE which may arise as an incident of LIGHTHOUSE performing services for the City. The City shall not be obligated to pay industrial insurance for the services rendered by LIGHTHOUSE. 11. Ownership of Work Product. All opinions, data, materials, reports, memoranda, and other documents developed by LIGHTHOUSE under this Agreement specifically for the City are the property of the City, shall be forwarded to the City at its request, and may be used by the City as the City sees fit. 12. Hold Harmless. LIGHTHOUSE agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, judgments or awards of damages, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of LIGHTHOUSE. The City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend LIGHTHOUSE, its members, employees, and approved sub -contractors (e.g. Special Counsel), from and against any and all claims, judgments or awards of damages, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents. To the extent necessary to fully fulfill these promises of indemnity, the parties waive their immunity under Title 51 RCW. 13. Rules of Professional Conduct. All services provided by LIGHTHOUSE under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys established by the Washington Supreme Court. 14. Work for Other Clients. LIGHTHOUSE may provide other services for clients other than the City during the term of this Agreement, but will not do so where the same may constitute a conflict of interest as defined by the Rules of Professional Conduct unless the City, after full disclosure of the potential or actual conflict, consents in writing to the representation. Any potential conflicts shall be handled in accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct referred to above. 15. Subcontracting or Assignment. LIGHTHOUSE may not assign or subcontract any portion of the services to be provided under this agreement without the express written consent of the City, PROVIDED THAT such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, and FURTHER PROVIDED THAT by this Agreement, the City hereby consents to LIGHTHOUSE's subcontracting with the following Special Counsel: Mike Bradley, attorneys supervised by Mike Bradley, and/or the respective legal entities through which they perform their legal services. Packet Pg. 479 10.5.a 16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between the City and the LIGHTHOUSE, superseding all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be modified, amended, or added to, only by written instrument properly signed by both parties hereto. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. Date: CITY OF EDMONDS Mike Nelson Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey City Clerk Date: LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC Patricia Taraday Managing Member Packet Pg. 480 10.5.b AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT entered into between the City of Edmonds ("the City") and Lighthouse Law Group PLLC ("LIGHTHOUSE") effective January 1, 2020, is entered into in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1. Services to be Provided. LIGHTHOUSE will serve as attorneys for the City on all civil legal matters assigned or referred to LIGHTHOUSE by the City during the term of this Agreement, and will perform all civil legal services for the City with the exception of litigation covered by the City's insurance pool and legal services related to the issuance of any municipal bond or similar security. This is a nonexclusive agreement and the City at its sole discretion may engage other legal counsel regarding any service that is expected to be provided by LIGHTHOUSE. Examples of such services expected to be provided by LIGHTHOUSE include, but are not limited to: 1.1 Preparing for and attending meetings of the City Council and City Council Committees, if applicable, as necessary or requested to do so; 1.2 Drafting ordinances, resolutions, and decisions; 1.3 Answering telephone calls from City elected officials and staff and providing general consultation on civil legal matters; 1.4 Attending meetings with City staff (including regular office hours if requested), the Mayor, and/or Council Members on civil legal matters; 1.5 Attending meetings of other City boards and commissions, such as the Planning Board and Hearing Examiner, when requested to do so; and 1.6 Negotiating with third parties other than in a litigation context, e.g., negotiating interlocal agreements. 1.7 Representing the City and its officials in litigation matters, provided, that in cases where the City and its officials have insurance coverage through WCIA or another insurer, LIGHTHOUSE will represent the City and its officials only until WCIA retained attorneys are actively handling the case or to the extent necessary to deal with non -covered claims or to provide consultation and coordination between the City and the WCIA retained attorneys; 1.8 Labor negotiation or arbitration; 1.9 Services related to local improvement districts; Packet Pg. 481 10.5.b 1.10 Services related to taxation; 1.11 Services requiring expertise in CERCLA, MTCA, or other state or federal environmental cleanup laws; 1.12 Representing the City in administrative proceedings before another governmental unit (such as Boundary Review Board hearings, proceedings before the State Shoreline Hearings Board, or proceedings before the State Growth Management Hearings Board); and 1.13 Telecommunications services, including franchise negotiation and leasing. 1.14 Office hours at City Hall will be provided by LIGHTHOUSE at least two days a week. 2. Personnel Performing Services. Jeff Taraday will be the lead attorney and shall have the primary responsibility for attending City Council meetings and delegating work to other LIGHTHOUSE attorneys as needed. Mr. Taraday may assign work to any attorney affiliated with LIGHTHOUSE. Provision of service by any other attorney shall require prior approval by the Mayor with notification provided to the Council of such assignment and approval. 3. Payment for Services. a. Except as provided in Section 3.b, below, during the year 2020, the City will pay LIGHTHOUSE for the services specified in Section 1 the sum of Forty-nine Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty-three Dollars ($49,883) a month (the flat fee). Except as provided in Section 3.b, below, during the year 2021, the City will pay LIGHTHOUSE for the services specified in Section I the sum of Fifty-one Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy- eight Dollars ($51,878) a month (the flat fee). Except as provided in Section 3.b, below, during the year 2022, the City will pay LIGHTHOUSE for the services specified in Section I the sum of Fifty-three Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-three Dollars ($53,953) a month (the flat fee). b. If any of the Option Triggering Events described in Section 3.c, below, occur, LIGHTHOUSE shall have the option to convert the flat fee compensation arrangement described in Section 3.a, above, to an hourly compensation arrangement. If exercised by LIGHTHOUSE, this option will have the effect of applying the hourly rates described in Section 3.d, below to all of the work performed by LIGHTHOUSE, including work that was performed prior to the Option Triggering Event, subject to the retroactive billing cap described in Section 3.e, below. Under no circumstances may LIGHTHOUSE apply hourly billing to work performed prior to January 1, 2020. LIGHTHOUSE shall have the ability to exercise this option, if triggered, at any time after the Option Triggering Event occurs by sending written notice to the City of its decision to exercise the option. If the option is exercised, LIGHTHOUSE shall send the City invoices that reflect the additional hourly charges owing after crediting the flat fee payments previously made by the City. c. Any of the following shall constitute Option Triggering Events for the purposes of triggering the option in Section 3.b, above: i. The City terminates the Agreement with LIGHTHOUSE prior to November 1, 2022; or ii. The City approves an in-house City Attorney position prior to November 1, 2022. Packet Pg. 482 10.5.b d. The discounted hourly rates below shall apply to the hourly invoices that will be paid by the City if LIGHTHOUSE exercises the option described in Section 3.b, abov. i. For 2020, the following hourly rates shall apply: 1. Jeff Taraday $295 2. Tom Brubaker $295 3. Mike Bradley $295 4. Rosa Fruehling-Watson $295 5. Sharon Cates $221 6. Patricia Taraday $221 7. Angela Tinker $221 8. Beth Ford $221 9. any other attorney $221 ii. For 2021, the following hourly rates shall apply: 1. Jeff Taraday $324 2. Tom Brubaker $324 3. Mike Bradley $324 4. Rosa Fruehling-Watson $324 5. Sharon Cates $243 6. Patricia Taraday $243 7. Angela Tinker $243 8. Beth Ford $243 9. any other attorney $243 iii. For 2022, the following hourly rates shall apply: 1. Jeff Taraday $337 2. Tom Brubaker $337 3. Mike Bradley $337 4. Rosa Fruehling-Watson $337 5. Sharon Cates $253 6. Patricia Taraday $253 7. Angela Tinker $253 8. Beth Ford $253 9. any other attorney $253 e. If LIGHTHOUSE exercises the option described in Section 3.b, above, the total number of months that LIGHTHOUSE may convert retroactively to hourly billing is limited, depending upon the year in which the Option Triggering Event occurs, as follows: i. If the Option Triggering Event occurs in 2020, LIGHTHOUSE may not convert retroactively any more than eight months to hourly billing; ii. If the Option Triggering Event occurs in 2021, LIGHTHOUSE may not convert retroactively any more than four months to hourly billing, but these months may include months in 2020 if the Option Triggering Event occurs during the first four months of 2021; iii. If the Option Triggering Event occurs in 2022, LIGHTHOUSE may not convert retroactively any more than two months to hourly billing, but these months may include months in 2021, if the Option Triggering Event occurs during the first two months of 2022. Packet Pg. 483 10.5.b 4. Awards of Attorneys Fees. If the City prevails in a legal matter and the tribunal awards reasonable attorneys fees to the City as the prevailing party, the hourly rates in Section 3.d, above shall apply for the purposes of calculating such fee award. These rates shall also be used where the City is able to charge a third -party (e.g. a real estate developer) for work performed by LIGHTHOUSE. Upon receipt of a fee award, the City shall keep the entire award PROVIDED THAT in cases initiated by the City including abatement actions, utility lien foreclosures, and other matters involving collection of a debt that is less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars, any attorneys fee award shall be paid to LIGHTHOUSE. 5. The City will not be charged separately for normal clerical or secretarial work, the expense of which has been calculated into LIGHTHOUSE's flat fee. Reimbursement will be made by the City for expenditures related to fees paid to a mediator, expert witness fees, court costs and fees, copying, postage, process service and courier costs. Other expenses shall be reimbursed when authorized in advance by the City. 6. Billing. The City shall pay the amount of the flat fee to LIGHTHOUSE on the last day of the month for which the legal services have been rendered. It shall not be necessary for LIGHTHOUSE to send an invoice for the flat fee to be paid. For informational purposes only, LIGHTHOUSE will send a detailed monthly description of the services rendered during the past month. If LIGHTHOUSE exercises the option in Section 3.b, above, then it shall invoice according to that section. 7. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2020 and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2022. This is an agreement for legal services and the City as client may terminate the Agreement for any reason upon sixty (60) days notice following a vote of the City Council to terminate the Agreement. In the event of termination, work in progress will be completed by LIGHTHOUSE if authorized by the City under terms acceptable to both parties. If completion of work in progress is not authorized or acceptable terms cannot be worked out, LIGHTHOUSE will submit all unfinished documents, reports, or other material to City and LIGHTHOUSE will be entitled to receive payment for any and all satisfactory work completed prior to the effective date of termination. 8. Professional Liability Insurance. LIGHTHOUSE will maintain professional liability insurance throughout the duration of this Agreement in the minimum amount of $2,000,000. 9. Discrimination. LIGHTHOUSE agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment or any other person in the performance of this Agreement because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age, or physical, mental or sensory handicap, except where a bona fide occupational qualification exists. 10. Independent Contractor. LIGHTHOUSE is an independent contractor with respect to the services to be provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be liable for, nor obligated to pay to LIGHTHOUSE, or any employee of LIGHTHOUSE, sick leave, vacation pay, overtime or any other benefit applicable to employees of the City, nor to pay or deduct any social security, income tax, or other tax from the payments made to LIGHTHOUSE which may arise as an incident of Packet Pg. 484 10.5.b LIGHTHOUSE performing services for the City. The City shall not be obligated to pay industrial insurance for the services rendered by LIGHTHOUSE. 11. Ownership of Work Product. All opinions, data, materials, reports, memoranda, and other documents developed by LIGHTHOUSE under this Agreement specifically for the City are the property of the City, shall be forwarded to the City at its request, and may be used by the City as the City sees fit. 12. Hold Harmless. LIGHTHOUSE agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, judgments or awards of damages, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of LIGHTHOUSE. The City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend LIGHTHOUSE, its members, employees, and approved sub -contractors (e.g. Special Counsel), from and against any and all claims, judgments or awards of damages, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents. To the extent necessary to fully fulfill these promises of indemnity, the parties waive their immunity under Title 51 RCW. 13. Rules of Professional Conduct. All services provided by LIGHTHOUSE under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys established by the Washington Supreme Court. 14. Work for Other Clients. LIGHTHOUSE may provide other services for clients other than the City during the term of this Agreement, but will not do so where the same may constitute a conflict of interest as defined by the Rules of Professional Conduct unless the City, after full disclosure of the potential or actual conflict, consents in writing to the representation. Any potential conflicts shall be handled in accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct referred to above. 15. Subcontracting or Assignment. LIGHTHOUSE may not assign or subcontract any portion of the services to be provided under this agreement without the express written consent of the City, PROVIDED THAT such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, and FURTHER PROVIDED THAT by this Agreement, the City hereby consents to LIGHTHOUSE's subcontracting with the following Special Counsel: Mike Bradley and/or the respective legal entities through which they perform their legal services. 16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between the City and the LIGHTHOUSE, superseding all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be modified, amended, or added to, only by written instrument properly signed by both parties hereto. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. Date: Date: CITY OF EDMONDS LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC Packet Pg. 485 10.5.b David O. Earling Sharon Cates Mayor Managing Member ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey City Clerk Packet Pg. 486 10.5.b 2020 Scenario: Assumptions: 1) Date City Terminates: Select from drop down menu 2) Total Annual Hours Worked by Lighthouse (fill-in) Steps to Calculate "Look Back" Costs Step 1) Calculate hours worked during "Look Back" period (i) average monthly hours worked = Total Annual Hours Worked / 12 months Step 2) Calculate hours worked during "Look Back" period (i) Number of months in "Look Back" period' (ii) Number of hours worked during "Look Back" period = average monthly hours worked X number of months in "Look Back" period Step 3a) Calculate "Look Back" costs (i) Select hourly rate from drop down menu: (ii) Hours worked during "Look Back" period (iii) Calculation of Hourly Cost = Hourly Rate X Number of hours worked in "Look Back" period (iv) Number of months in "Look Back" period (v) Deduct flat fee @ $49,833/month X number of months in "Look Back" period Look Back cost 'Note: 2020 "Look Back" period contractually limited to 8 months 8/31/2020 3,930 328 8 2,620 $258 2,620 $675,960 8 ($398,667) $277,293 Packet Pg. 487 10.5.b 2021 Scenario: Assumptions: 1) Date City Terminates: Select from drop down menu 2) Total Annual Hours Worked by Lighthouse (fill-in) Steps to Calculate "Look Back" Costs Step 1) Calculate hours worked during "Look Back" period (i) average monthly hours worked = Total Annual Hours Worked / 12 months Step 2) Calculate hours worked during "Look Back" period (i) Number of months in "Look Back" period' (ii) Number of hours worked during "Look Back" period = average monthly hours worked X number of months in "Look Back" period Step 3a) Calculate "Look Back" costs (i) Select hourly rate from drop down menu: (ii) Hours worked during "Look Back" period (iii) Calculation of Hourly Cost = Hourly Rate X Number of hours worked in "Look Back" period (iv) Number of months in "Look Back" period (v) Deduct flat fee @ $51,827/month X number of months in "Look Back" period Look Back cost 'Note: 2021 "Look Back" period contractually limited to 4 months 5/31/2021 3,930 328 4 1,310 $284 1,310 $372,040 4 ($207,307) $164, 733 Packet Pg. 488 10.5.b 2022 Scenario: Assumptions: 1) Date City Terminates: Select from drop down menu 2) Total Annual Hours Worked by Lighthouse (fill-in) Steps to Calculate "Look Back" Costs Step 1) Calculate hours worked during "Look Back" period (i) average monthly hours worked = Total Annual Hours Worked / 12 months Step 2) Calculate hours worked during "Look Back" period (i) Number of months in "Look Back" period' (ii) Number of hours worked during "Look Back" period = average monthly hours worked X number of months in "Look Back" period Step 3a) Calculate "Look Back" costs (i) Select hourly rate from drop down menu: (ii) Hours worked during "Look Back" period (iii) Calculation of Hourly Cost = Hourly Rate X Number of hours worked in "Look Back" period (iv) Number of months in "Look Back" period (v) Deduct flat fee @ $53,900/month X number of months in "Look Back" period Look Back cost 'Note: 2022 "Look Back" period contractually limited to 2 months 8/31/2022 3,930 328 2 655 $295 655 $193,225 2 ($107,799) $85,426 Packet Pg. 489 City of Edmonds 10.5.b Summary Scores from City Attorney Services Evaluation Respondents. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Mean Score* Median Score* Question Numbers: 1.a 7 7 7 5 7 5 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 6.62 7.00 1.b 7 7 7 3 6 4 7 5 5 3 6 7 5 6 5.57 6.00 1.c 7 7 5 5 7 5 7 6 7 2 7 7 7 7 6.14 7.00 1.d 3 7 5 7 7 5.80 7.00 Le 7 6 7 5 7 6 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 6.62 7.00 1.f 6 7 4 5 7 6 7 1 7 7 7 6 5.83 6.50 1.g 7 7 6 3 7 7 6 7 1 4 7 7 6 5.77 7.00 2.a 7 7 6 5 6 5 7 6 7 2 6 7 7 6 6.00 6.50 2.b 7 7 7 6 7 5 7 6 7 1 7 7 7 6 6.21 7.00 2.c 6 7 7 4 7 4 7 6 6 5 7 6 6 6.00 6.00 2.d 5 7 7 5 7 5 6 6 7 6 6 6.09 6.00 2.e 5 7 6 2 4 3 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 5.69 6.00 2.f 6 7 6 5 6 4 7 5 7 2 6 7 7 6 5.79 6.50 2.g 6 7 5 5 6 5 7 6 6 4 7 7 7 5 5.93 6.00 2. h 6 7 5 3 5 5 7 2 6 7 6 6 5.42 6.00 2.i 7 7 6 3 7 2 6 6 5 7 6 5 5.58 6.00 2. j 7 7 5 3 7 2 5 5 6 7 5 6 5.42 5.00 3.a 6 7 4 4 4 7 6 7 7 7 6 6 5.92 6.00 3.b 7 7 5 6 4 7 7 7 7 7 6 5.83 7.00 3.c 7 7 5 7 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6.67 7.00 3.d 7 7 6 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 6.80 7.00 3.e 7 7 4 6 5 7 6 7 7 7 6.30 7.00 3.f 7 7 3 4 5 6 7 6 7 7 7 6.00 7.00 October 18, 2019 Packet Pg. 490 City of Edmonds 10.5.b Summary Scores from City Attorney Services Evaluation 4.a 7 7 3 4 7 4 7 5 6 7 7 7 6 5.92 7.00 4.b 6 3 5 5 5 5 6 5 7 6 5 5.27 5.00 5.a 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7.00 7.00 5.b 6 7 6 7 7 6 6.50 6.50 5.c 6 4 2 1 5 1 2 5 7 6 1 3.64 4.00 5.d 5 7 7 5 6 7 6 7 6 7 7 7 6.42 7.00 5.e 7 7 7 7.00 7.00 5.f 7 5 5 2 5 2 7 1 4 7 6 5 4.67 5.00 5.g 7 7 4 7 7 7 7 7 6.63 7.00 5.h 7 6 4 5 7 7 6 6 7 7 7 6.27 7.00 5A 7 7 4 3 7 7 6 6 7 7 7 6.18 7.00 6.a 6 6 1 4 3 7 4 5 1 5 7 5 4 4.46 5.00 6.b 7 7 7 5 7 4 7 5 6 2 6 7 5 6 5.79 6.00 6.c 7 7 5 4 7 5 7 5 5 2 7 7 7 6 5.79 6.50 6.d 7 5 4 5 7 5 7 4 4 2 6 7 6 5 5.29 5.00 6.e 6 6 4 5 5 7 4 5 2 4 7 6 6 5.15 5.00 6.f 6 7 1 2 3 7 4 6 1 5 7 6 4 4.54 5.00 6.g 7 7 7 5 7 5 6 6 7 7 7 6 5.92 7.00 6. h 6 7 1 5 7 5 7 6 1 6 7 7 6 5.46 6.00 6. i 7 7 5 3 6 3 7 7 2 5 7 7 5 5.46 6.00 7.a 7 7 5 5 7 5 7 6 6 6 7 7 6 6.23 6.00 7.b 7 7 5 5 7 5 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 6.38 7.00 7.c 7 5 4 3 4 3 3 7 4 7 7 5 4.54 4.50 7.d 7 7 7 2 7 2 6 7 7 7 7 7 5.62 7.00 7.e 7 7 5 5 7 6 7 7 6 6.33 7.00 7.f 7 7 2 7 3 7 7 6 6 7 7 6.00 7.00 7.g 7 7 4 6 7 5 7 7 7 5 7 7 7 6 6.36 7.00 October 18, 2019 Packet Pg. 491 City of Edmonds 10.5.b Summary Scores from City Attorney Services Evaluation 7.h 7 7 4 4 1 6 7 6 5.25 6.00 7.j 7 6 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 1 6 7 7 6 6.29 7.00 7.k 7 7 5 5 7 6 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 6.54 7.00 7.1 7 7 2 7 1 7 3 5 6 7 5 6 5.25 6.00 Average Score 6.64 6.58 5.16 4.14 6.44 4.05 6.75 5.50 6.14 1.86 6.07 7.00 6.59 5.86 5.63 5.79 *Mean Score is the average of all the scores *Median Score is the middle value of all the scores. Blank Items Represent a Not Applicable Answer October 18, 2019 Packet Pg. 492 10.5.b City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Purpose of Evaluation: The purpose of the performance evaluation process to be conducted by and between the City Council and the City Attorney are: 1. To strengthen the relationship between the City Attorney and the City's duly authorized constituents (City Council, Mayor, Directors, etc.) through clarification of the City Attorney's roles and responsibilities 2. To provide feedback to the City Attorney and identify areas where improvement may be needed 3. To determine whether the cost -to -service -level ratio is in balance (e.g. whether the City Attorney has performed satisfactorily given the resources allocated and whether those resources should be adjusted in the future) 4. To determine if it is time to develop an RFP to rebid our city attorney services and what might be included in those services for the city (current level of services and/or new levels: i.e. prosecuting attorney services, etc.) This process and policy recognizes that the current City Attorney is a private law firm retained by the City Council under contract with the City. In addition to this evaluation process, a parallel process will be undertaken to determine whether to switch to an "in-house" city attorney model and what the potential costs vs service levels that would be. Evaluation Procedure: The Mayor, the City Department Directors, or their designated managers and all City Council members will complete the evaluation form along with the current City Attorney. When Directors happen to know that a particular city employee, below the level of Director, has worked with the City Attorney's Office on a frequent basis, the Director should consult with those employees prior to completing the evaluation form or may ask those employees to complete their own form. Each form will identify the person completing the form so that that person can be contacted by City Council with follow up questions about any concerns raised. The completed forms will remain confidential and only reviewed by Council Members Mesaros and Teitzel. Please be candid with your feedback. It is very important to have accurate and full evaluation feedback to ensure we make fully informed decisions regarding Edmonds' legal representation. Once the evaluation forms have been completed, an aggregated summary copy of the forms --with all names, titles and contact information excluded-- will be submitted to the City Attorney's Office for review and comment. If any of the evaluation feedback raises performance concerns, those City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 493 concerns will be discussed with the City Attorney by Council Members Mesaros and Teitzel prior to being reviewed with the full city council. The two council members will present the aggregated evaluation and any written response from the City Attorney to the City Council for their review. Unfortunately, City Council discussion of these documents may need to be limited due to Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) rules. While the OPMA allows the City Council to review the performance of a public employee in executive session, it does not allow the City Council to review the performance of a contracted City Attorney in executive session. Furthermore, it is reasonably likely that any public discussion by the City Council of these documents could reveal or invite revelation of communications that would ordinarily to be protected under RPC 1.6 Confidentiality of Information. Therefore, if, upon review of these documents, certain council members may want to discuss the results of the evaluation with the City Attorney, it may be more appropriate to have council members meet individually and informally with the City Attorney. Completed evaluation forms should be returned directly to Maureen Judge at the council office for review by Council Members Mesaros and Teitzel by August 31, 2019. City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 494 10.5.b City Attorney Performance Evaluation Form Please complete and return this form to Reviewed by: Date of Review: Performance Evaluation: by Rate each item on a scale of 1 to 7 with 1 being low and 7 being high. For any ratings of 4 or lower, please provide additional explanation for the rating. Write "N/A" if the particular question is not applicable to your own interaction with the City Attorney. References herein to "City Attorney" include all attorneys associated with Lighthouse Law Group PLLC, not a particular attorney. 1) Trustworthiness / Integrity / Ethical Compliance: a. Does the City Attorney seem to understand that its client is the municipal corporation and not any particular constituent that is authorized to act on behalf of the municipal corporation? b. Does the City Attorney execute its role in a manner that is fair to the various duly authorized constituents of the City of Edmonds (as opposed to taking a result - oriented approach where one constituent or set of constituents is favored over another constituent regardless of the law)? (7 for high levels of fairness; 1 for high levels of result -oriented approach) c. In general, has the City Attorney acted in the best interests of the municipal corporation? d. When presented with knowledge that an officer or employee intends to act in a manner that is in violation of a legal obligation to the municipal corporation, has the City Attorney appropriately referred the matter to a higher authority in the organization? e. Would you trust the City Attorney to refer matters of the type mentioned in "item d", above, to a higher authority if they were to arise in the future? City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 495 10.5.b f. If and when the City Attorney itself has made an error or an incorrect statement, has the City Attorney made a timely and appropriate disclosure of that error? g. Would you trust the City Attorney to make a timely and appropriate disclosure of its own future errors? 2) Legal Consultation: a. Has legal advice provided by the City Attorney proven to be accurate and technically correct? b. Does the City Attorney provide its best and honest recommendations given all existing legal issues and ramifications? c. Does the City Attorney possess and provide an efficient and effective knowledge of the City's Municipal Code and regulations? d. Does the City Attorney possess and provide an efficient and effective knowledge of other government regulations and case law regarding municipal government regulations and case law regarding municipal government and issues facing the City? e. Does advice provided by the City Attorney regularly take into account and balance the overall goals and objectives of the City? f. Does the City Attorney regularly provide the scope of legal expertise necessary to meet the City's needs on issues that arise? g. Does the City Attorney proactively identify potential issues when it is aware of them to avoid problems from occurring? City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 496 h. Are alternative and innovative solutions provided rather than just raising problems? i. Is the City Attorney able to maintain the City Council's and City Staffs confidence while informing them of the different legal risks that proposed actions might generate? J. Are city staff and the City Council advised on key changes in municipal law as it pertains to the City's activities? 3) Litigation: a. Does the City Attorney zealously advocate for the interests of the City? b. Is the City Attorney's approach effective in achieving the best possible legal outcomes for the City's interest given the issues that arise? c. Does the City Attorney represent the City in a professional and ethical manner? d. Does the City Attorney make effective use of executive session to advise the City Council on the status and risks associated with pending or potential litigation? e. Are the City Attorney's estimates of legal impacts reasonably accurate on a regular basis? Has the City Attorney been successful in accomplishing the City's litigation objectives? City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 497 10.5.b 4) Document Review and Preparation: a. Does the City Attorney prepare ordinances, resolutions, contracts, correspondence and other legal work accurately and consistent with the direction and objectives communicated by the City Council, Mayor and/or department directors? b. Does the City Attorney make beneficial suggestions about how the city code should be updated or revised? Does the City Attorney accurately identify and address all legal issues within documents and items that it reviews? 5) Cost/Fiscal Accountability and Control: a. Are regular legal activities achieved within budgetary goals and limits? b. Has the City Attorney been effective in minimizing legal costs by limiting tasks to those regarding legal issues and utilizing City in-house staff when possible to perform administrative and other functions? c. Are standard forms developed and used where possible to minimize preparation of legal documentation? d. Are legal tasks performed with appropriate authorization according to established procedures and contract requirements? e. Do invoices accurately identify tasks and expenses in sufficient detail to provide accountability? f. Does the City Attorney display the ability and knowledge to research issues in a minimum amount of time? City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 498 10.5.b g. Have legal costs been effectively managed and controlled given the issues, assignments and requests made to the City Attorney? h. Do you feel that the City has benefitted from the flat fee arrangement with the City Attorney? i. Do you believe that the City would have incurred more legal expenses than it has actually incurred if the City Attorney was compensated on an hourly basis? 6) Responsiveness/Timeliness of Actions: a. Are requested legal work and assignments completed within a clearly established time frame? b. Is the City Attorney accessible by email when needed to respond to requests for legal information and assistance? C. Is the City Attorney accessible by telephone when needed to respond to requests for legal information and assistance? d. Is the City Attorney accessible in person when needed to respond to requests for legal information and assistance? e. Are legal review and requests for information completed in time to avoid delays to City projects, programs and other tasks? f. Does the City Attorney follow up efficiently to requests that are made? City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 499 10.5.b g. Does the City Attorney accurately interpret and clarify City Council and Mayor direction? h. Has the City Attorney provided an appropriate level of service considering the amount of the City's flat fee arrangement with the City Attorney? i. Has the City Attorney appropriately prioritized the various projects needing attention when considering the best interests of the municipal corporation? 7) Communications and Interpersonal Relations: a. Does the City Attorney communicate effectively with the City Council, the Mayor, city staff and community? b. Are answers provided in an understandable manner? Are timelines for follow up to requests clearly communicated? d. Does the City Attorney maintain appropriate confidentiality with regard to all matters discussed with the Mayor, City Council, department directors and city staff? e. Does the City Attorney effectively report to the City Council and/or Mayor communications by project attorneys of a substantive nature regarding significant or sensitive matters? £ Does the City Attorney maintain good working relationships and serve as an effective member of the management team? City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 500 g. Does the City Attorney display a positive attitude in carrying out its responsibilities and responding to requests? h. When asked to do so, has the City Attorney effectively mediated disputes among various constituents within the organization? Is the City Attorney tactful and diplomatic in its communication? k. Is the City Attorney's oral communication during council meetings clear and direct? Has the City Attorney been a positive force toward improving and/or maintaining a positive relationship between the City Council and the Administration? 8) General Comments Regarding the City Attorney's Performance: City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation for City Attorney Services July 31, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 501 10.5.b City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/26/2019 Renewal of City Attorney Contract Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History The proposed city attorney contract is attached. Here are some historical city attorney fees for comparison purposes: 2009 $530,079 2010 $605,363 The proposed Lighthouse Contract fees over the next three years: 2020 $598,596 2021 $622,536 2022 $647,436 Staff Recommendation Approve the three year contract now and reevaluate it during 2020 once the current City Attorney Services Comparative Study is completed. Narrative The proposed fees for 2020 are actually less than what the city paid in 2010. The proposed contract has a 60 day cancellation clause and reverts from a flat fee arrangement to an hourly billable rate system based on certain triggers as described in "Section 3 Payment for Services". Attachments: 2019-11-12 Lighthouse contract with Edmonds City Attorney Evaluation Process 190731 Evaluation Tally 191018 Lighthouse Estimated Contract Costs v3 Packet Pg. 502 10.5.c Councilmember Buckshnis offered to draft the agenda memo with her amendments. Mr. Williams said staff will review her email and contact her with any questions. Councilmember Buckshnis reiterated she was just adding placeholders for park funds. Mr. Williams said the governor's budget and priorities are well known to staff and will obviously be part of anything that is done related to the marsh. He reiterated the marsh is a city project with a lot of funding sources. Administratively if a line item is included in the REET funds with the cost to be determined, he asked if she wanted a concomitant change in the stormwater budget. Councilmember Buckshnis answered no, she was leaving that as is. She was including the project in parks for the next administration. Council President Fraley-Monillas commented it did not sound like Councilmember Buckshnis' amendment would change the cost or intent. She suggested incorporating Councilmember Buckshnis' changes so the CFP/CIP did not have to be presented to the Council again next week. Mr. Williams said Mr. English, Ms. Burley and he will confer and bring it back. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 4. RENEWAL OF CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT Councilmember Mesaros said the information in the packet is same as last week so he had no additional presentation. In response to comments made earlier by Mr. Tupper, Councilmember Mesaros referred to the November 4' meeting minutes that reflect Mr. Taraday presented a contract and following discussion, the Council directed Councilmember Teitzel and he to meet with Mr. Taraday, review the Council comments and Mr. Taraday developed a different contract proposal. He clarified Councilmember Teitzel and he were not negotiating a contract with Mr. Taraday, just commenting on it. Mr. Taraday said the contract in the packet tonight is not the original contract; he proposed revisions based on Council feedback. Also in response to Mr. Tupper's recommendation that the Council review, comment and vote on the contract, Councilmember Mesaros said that was exactly what the Council was doing tonight. Council President Fraley-Monillas reviewed a timeline of how, what, when, where and why: • July 2 — Councilmember Mesaros distributed a memo outlining the attorney evaluation process with a goal of a September completion so the Council could make a decision in October. Council gave Councilmember Mesaros and Teitzel the green light to proceed with their staff evaluation survey questions August — Councilmembers Mesaros and Teitzel updated Council on the 2-part survey and notified Council they were getting costs for in-house and contracted attorneys September — first evaluation results shared with Council October 15 — draft questionnaire approved Council President Fraley-Monillas said he found no evidence regarding direction given to Counc 1 Imembers Teitzel and Mesaros regarding their role in the process Councilmember Teitzel explained there are two part to this issue, 1) whether the City is getting good quality legal advice via the Lighthouse arrangement which the in-house satisfaction survey summarized in the packet shows in general there is satisfaction with Lighthouse, and 2) is the City getting good value. Mr. James has provided billed hour information from Lighthouse vouchers for 2016, 2017 and 2018; the average hourly cost is $165. Having worked with a lot of attorneys over the past several years, Councilmember Teitzel said he has paid more than that so finds it a fair value. Based on Council approval in October, Councilmember Mesaros and he are surveying 10 other cities regarding their cost for city attorney services, a major effort for those cities to gather that data. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 26, 2019 Page 14 Packet Pg. 503 10.5.c Councilmember Buckshnis commented her interest was piqued by Mr. Tupper's comments. She reviewed the minutes which reflect a long deliberation about the contract and a statement by Councilmember Mesaros that Council review the data provided by the Council President and he will work with her on future agenda items to bring this matter to a close as soon as possible in a manner that will provide some certainty about the upcoming 12 months as well as be fair to the Lighthouse Group. The minutes reflect that Councilmember Mesaros suggested that Councilmember Teitzel, he and Mr. Taraday consider the comments made tonight and possibly make revisions to the contract. Councilmember Teitzel said the contract would be expiring so they would bring it back as soon as possible. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she did not have much input into the process. Another thing that hasn't been looked at are comps for in-house attorneys which would be equivalent to a flat fee. Her preliminary research found the amount paid to Lighthouse would fund at least two full-time attorneys, perhaps more, and an assistant attorney. In-house attorneys also work as many hours as needed. She was not suggesting one way or another but was uncertain that appropriate due diligence had been done to grant a three year contract. She said HR has a role and HR has not weighed in on the contracts. She could understand a one year contract, but with a three year contract, the City would be paying an hourly rate if it get bids from other companies. She commented it was appropriate to see what's out there when the City has contracted with someone for eight years. She acknowledged the evaluation was fine, but was unsure the Council had done its due diligence so she would not support a three year contract as she did not feel it was in the City's best interest. Councilmember Teitzel said the concern with an in-house attorney for Edmonds was the only way to get estimates of the costs would be an RFQ which takes time and clearly there is not enough time between now and the end of the year. The future Council has the ability to do whatever they want in that regard. Lighthouse's contract expires at the end of 2019; it is incumbent on this Council to use the information available to make a decision. Councilmember Buckshnis cautioned that making a decision regarding in-house counsel will take much longer than a year. Like a city manager, there are distinctive differences related to in-house counsel in that they report to the mayor; the City will have a new mayor and four new councilmembers. She was very concerned about providing stability and history with regard to current citizens, litigation, unions, etc. and felt it would be risky not to continue with the current city attorney for at least 1-2 years. She recalled doing an extensive review of the city attorney in 2014. Councilmember Nelson expressed appreciation for the work Councilmembers Mesaros and Teitzel have done to get the Council to this point. The Council gave them direction and they have done the best they could with the time they had. He also appreciated the work that Lighthouse and Mr. Taraday have done for the City to date. It is important for the Council to acknowledge its fiduciary duty to be good stewards of public funds; moving forward with a three-year contract without a competitive process is a breach of that duty. The Council should not take at face value that the City is "getting a good deal" because Lighthouse Law Group says so. Councilmember Nelson explained it is the Council's duty to review any contract up for to renewal and do their due diligence. The proposed contract will potentially saddle the future Council for up to three years, potentially cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and potentially set that Council up to fail. He agreed with completing the process and was satisfied with an interim short-term contract while that is completed next year. With regard to stability, he questioned how this Council could assure what the next Council wanted, whether they wanted stability or progress and reform. The Council should not presume or dictate what the next Council wants, particularly when a majority of the existing Council will not be here next year. He summarized it should be left up to the next Council to determine the long term direction of the city attorney. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 26, 2019 Page 15 Packet Pg. 504 10.5.c Councilmember Mesaros relayed in the study Councilmember Teitzel and he are conducting, preliminary data from two of the five cities with in-house attorneys, the cost is nearly $1M/year. Data from the other three cities has not been provided yet. In comparison, the numbers provided by Lighthouse are favorable. He reminded that the contract with Lighthouse is a 60 day contract, basically renewable every day. As the data is provided and reviewed, the new Council could put Lighthouse on notice in the new year, their rates will convert to billable time and the cost to the City will be minimal. He summarized the City would not be locked in for three years; the new Council can make any decision they wish. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE CONTRACT PRESENTED IN THE PACKET BY THE LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP. Council President Fraley-Monillas said will not support the motion for the reasons she stated. She has obtained costs for contracting city attorneys in comparator cities; the $ 1 M amount includes the prosecutor and defense in most cases. Councilmember Mesaros said the two examples he shared do not include prosecution services. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if the cities were comparables. Councilmember Mesaros said the Council agreed to the 10 cities; 5 with in-house attorneys and 5 with contracted city attorney services. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she was anxious to learn what two cities those were. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mr. Taraday and Lighthouse for their services over the last 9 years, commenting this process is marginalizing their hard work. She pointed out although she won the election, 42% of the population did not vote for her. In the evaluation of Lighthouse, less than 20% of evaluations were not positive. Three citizens have complained but more than 20 have indicated the need for stability for directors, staff, councilmembers and the new mayor. She agreed the contract has a 60 day clause. Lighthouse has been involved in a great deal of litigation for the City and now some Councilmembers want to try something new due to a new Council. She compared it to moving into a new house, you don't remodel everything. For the benefit of staff, directors and council, she will support the contract. Councilmember Johnson expressed support for the motion in a large part due to her experience with Lighthouse and Mr. Taraday in particular. When she was Council President, she found him to be very accessible and provided helpful advice. She did not see any reason to make a change at this time. Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for the contract. He found it very useful to have multiple attorneys available for different topics which provides expertise at a variety of levels and flexibility when the need arises which he was sure would continue in the future. Everything he has heard in the past year recommends continuing with Lighthouse; the processes have been streamlined, systems and processes are in place, and good communications that will continue into the future. He concluded a three year contract did not seem unreasonable. 10. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2) COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, MESAROS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER NELSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO. 1. 2020 BUDGET REVIEW Mayor Earling relayed Council President Fraley-Monillas and he agreed to have Councilmembers ask questions and for the submitter of amendments to introduce them. No voting will occur tonight to allow Councilmembers time to consider the ramifications of the amendments. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 26, 2019 Page 16 Packet Pg. 505