The URL can be used to link to this page

2022-10-12 Planning Board PacketC)p E 04 � O Planning Board Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda 121 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 www.edmondswa.gov Michelle Martin 425-771-0220 Wednesday, October 12, 2022 7:00 PM Virtual Online Meeting 1. 2. A. Remote Meeting Information Join Zoom Meeting: https://edmondswa- gov.zoom.us/j/88526558062?pwd=YUtoNGFFQ210Q2U5SDdwRUFadX15dz09 Meeting ID: 885 2655 8062. Passcode: 598700 Call into the meeting by dialing: 253-215-8782 Phyiscal Location The Planning Board members will be meeting remotely for this meeting and the public may as well at the zoom information above. However, given the expiration of Gov. Inslee's proclamation on open public meetings, a physical location to participate in the meeting must be provided. For this meeting the physical location provide is Edmonds Waterfront Center Community Room B located at 220 Railroad Avenue. Land Acknowledgement for Indigenous Peoples We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. Call to Order Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived Approval of Minutes Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6893) Approval of Minutes Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Approve minutes from the September 14th and September 28th meetings. Planning Board Page 1 Printed 101712022 Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda October 12, 2022 3. 4. 5. A. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Revised September 14, 2022 Minutes • Draft September 28, 2022 Minutes (PDF) Announcement of Agenda Audience Comments Administrative Reports Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6874) (PDF) Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department - Q3 Update Narrative This is the 2022 third quarter update of the Parks, Recreation & Human Services (PRHS) Department's accomplishments for the months of July through September to the Parks & Planning Board. Attached is a more detailed list of the department's work for the three months. In addition, a PowerPoint presentation is planned for the October 12th Board meeting to provide additional information and answer questions. Highlights for 2022 3rd Quarter (additional items found in attached Accomplishment List) 1. Administration: Agreements for concessionaires (6) and special events (1) completed. Oversight for 5 special events plus Summer Market, supporting Library renovation and operating and capital budget preparation and submittal. Salmon Safe certification draft report reviewed by city council. Continued work on possible parkland acquisitions 2. Civic Playfield Park Project: Construction continuing with amenities being installed such as athletic field turf and lights, inclusive playground, shade structure, concrete path, restroom foundation, and site underground utilities. All benches and tables adoptions sold (21 total). 3. Park Planning: Parks Maintenance greenhouse permit submittal completed and using new Job Order Contracting services for installation. New Parks Planner/Project Manager position started July 18th. Yost Park bridge #6 closed indefinitely. Off -site stormwater mitigation project (96t" Ave Infiltration) is out to bid with construction slated for winter. 4. Parks Maintenance: Memorial bench replacements at Marina Beach Park, supported 5 special events plus both Summer and Uptown Markets. Replenished safety fall material at all city playgrounds. Yost pool and Spray Park operations at 7 days/week and Spray Park had seasonal closure mid -September. 5. Recreation and Cultural Services Programs: Q3 Permits - 46 shelter permits, 560 field rental hours and 50 gym rental hours. Programming included new weekly Summer Day Planning Board Page 2 Printed 101712022 Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda October 12, 2022 Camp and 24 contracted youth camps; Adult Softball (63 teams) and Pickleball (18 teams) Leagues and new fitness classes. Supported public access for all city board and commission meetings at the Waterfront Center. Five Discovery Programs week-long outdoor summer camps, 8 Discovery Interpretive Tables at Olympic Beach, City Park, and Mathay-Bal linger Park (first City program there) and Beach Rangers patrolled the waterfront every day from Memorial Day through Labor Day weekend. 6. Arts & Cultural Division Effective September 1, 2022 this division was transferred to the Community Services/Economic Development Department. Our department will still manage the division's budget through the end of the year to support an easier transition. Currently the staff will remain at the Frances Anderson Center although the remainder of their new department is housed at City Hall. 7. Human Services Division: Supported Snohomish County's efforts to purchase America's Best Value Inn for an enhanced shelter. Provided Social Services support at each Edmonds Community Court. Accepted over 50 referrals and have 38 engaged clients. Completed integration of contracted service provider (social worker) with Police. Began outreach from City Hall Neighborhood Office to individuals along the Hwy 99 corridor. Provided ongoing support for distribution of ARPA funding through Household Support Grant program. Coordinated with Council Legislative Aide on Suicide Awareness and Prevention website. Coordinated with the Food Bank and Municipal Court to provide food to clients attending Community Court; procured refrigerator for perishable food. Coordinated with Snohomish County to relocate 5 motel voucher recipients to different motels while America's Best Value Inn is being purchased. ATTACHMENTS: • PRHS 2022 Q3 Accomplishments (PDF) 6. Public Hearings 7. New Business A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6888) Presentation of Proposed 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program Background/History The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects. These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. Planning Board Page 3 Printed 101712022 Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda October 12, 2022 Staff Recommendation Hold public hearing on October 26, 2022. ATTACHMENTS: • Parks CIP_CFP 2023-2028 (PDF) • 2023-2028 Public Works CIP-CFP (PDF) 8. Unfinished Business A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6897) Tree Code Amendments AMD2022-0004 Background/History Edmonds' tree code, Chapter 23.10 ECDC<https://www.codepublishing.com/\NA/Edmonds/> primarily focuses on tree retention related to development. During its adoption last year, the City Council and the Planning Board directed staff to further amend the code to limit property owner tree removals under a second phase of tree code amendments. Note that new code requirements resulting in significant changes to procedures or additional cost to permit applicants are `Major' code amendments. The City Council and Planning Board provided general feedback for improvements to the current tree code and confirmed the project scope at the June 21 and July 13 meetings, respectively. Staff was directed to expand the scope of "Phase 2" tree code amendments to consider minor changes to the existing code that: • Clarify, simplify, and provide greater code consistency. • Streamline the development review or tree removal process. • Align with industry standards. • Address situations that have required a code interpretation, when the code is difficult or unclear in its application, or as trends in code enforcement merit code clarification. Staff developed an initial list of preliminary tree code amendments that follows this scope and general direction. At the September 14 Planning Board meeting, the Board provided feedback on preliminary code amendments #1-11, indicating a few clarifications were needed but that overall, the preliminary code changes would achieve the scope and direction of the Phase 2 tree code amendments. The Planning board raised one Major code amendment consideration that has been added to the Major code amendment list, to be discussed later. The list has been revised (Attachment 1) to show proposed code changes grouped by three primary code amendment classifications, according to the impact of code modifications: Minor - amendments do not change the meaning of the code. They clarify/simplify or further define something already in the code, address redundancies, address typos or result in simple reformatting or removal of outdated references, including industry standards, Best Management Practices, etc. without resulting in increased requirements. Moderate - amendments are relatively uncontroversial restructuring of code sections, and any of the above Minor amendments that result in new, increased or eliminated requirements. Major - amendments add a substantial prohibition/ban on something currently allowed or add substantial new requirements. This category would include any amendments that result in significant changes to existing procedures or significant additional cost to permit applicants, and/or change the intent of the code. Staff is expecting that several additional code amendments will be identified at subsequent Planning Board Page 4 Printed 101712022 Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda October 12, 2022 Planning Board, Tree Board, City Council, and stakeholder meetings and from public feedback. Staff Recommendation Confirm that the remaining preliminary `Minor' code amendments to Chapter 23.10 ECDC, #12- 19 are appropriate in achieving the scope and direction of the Phase 2 tree code amendments. ATTACHMENTS: • Minor Tree Code Amend List (PDF) • Packet PB Meeting PPT 10122022 (PDF) B. City Council Joint Meeting 9. Planning Board Extended Agenda A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6895) Extended Agenda Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review Extended Agenda ATTACHMENTS: • 10.07.2022 Extended Agenda (PDF) 10. Planning Board Chair Comments 11. Planning Board Member Comments 12. Adjournment Planning Board Page 5 Printed 101712022 2.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2022 Approval of Minutes Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Kernen Lien Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Approve minutes from the September 14th and September 28th meetings. Narrative Draft meeting minutes attached. Attachments: Draft Revised September 14, 2022 Minutes Draft September 28, 2022 Minutes Packet Pg. 6 2.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Webinar Meeting September 14, 2022 Vice Chair Pence called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. and announced Chair Crank would be joining later. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Board Member Campbell read the Land Acknowledgement. Board Members Present Alicia Crank, Chair' Roger Pence, Vice Chair Todd Cloutier Judi Gladstone Richard Kuehn Mike Rosen Beth Tragus-Campbell (alternate) Lily Distelhorst (student rep) Board Members Absent Matt Cheung (excused) Staff Present Kernen Lien, Planning Division Manager Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 10, 2022 AS PRESENTED. Vice Chair Pence noted a correction to the name of Michelle Dotsch under Audience Comments on page 1. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None ' Chair Crank joined the meeting late. Vice Chair Pence chaired the entire meeting. d c 0 0 a a Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 14, 2022 Page 1 of 7 Packet Pg. 7 2.A.a ADNUMSTRATIVE REPORTS A. Reimagining Neighborhoods and Streets Director McLaughlin made an informational presentation regarding Reimagining Neighborhoods Streets + Creating Community Spaces Together. The project objectives are to develop new street and public space typologies that will guide how streets are built in the future and allow for more spontaneous use of public space. The scope of work will include developing new street typologies (sidewalk code update, street map update, update of pedestrian prioritization investment network); developing new public space typologies (how streets can be reallocated to expand public space, design standards to shape public space in the right of way); and N creating a public space activation strategies toolkit (empowering communities to utilize streets for people needs beyond mobility, permitting structure to enable each strategy). The new street typologies will consider vehicle movement and ensure that street design serves social, environmental, and economic needs and functions. She o reviewed an example of a draft street typology cross-section and map. 0 Public Space Activation refers to making the best use of streets we already have. This could be for certain parts L a of the street and/or certain times, days, and special events. Six in -person neighborhood meetings were held to Q raise awareness about this topic. Participants voted on activation strategies that would be best suited to their neighborhoods. Staff tallied those responses and mailed postcards to the broader neighborhood to confirm those activation ideas. Director McLaughlin explained that the City is committed to funding and supporting one pilot project in each neighborhood district (Downtown, Five Corners, Firdale, Westgate, Highway 99Ballinger, and N Perrinville). N A Public Space Activation Toolkit provides critical information for each activation strategy to reduce barriers for community -led design and implementation. It also offers ideas to neighborhoods to promote social gathering/community building. Director McLaughlin reviewed a tentative timeline for this project with anticipated Council adoption in Q 1 of 2023. Board Member Cloutier said he loved the layout and the systematic approach. Board Member Campbell agreed with Board Member Cloutier. She was disappointed with the poor response in the Highway 99Ballinger area. She asked if there are plans to do additional outreach to get more people involved. Director McLaughlin noted that the purpose is to raise awareness so even if there is a smaller core group it can still be effective. The City will be doing more outreach before the package gets adopted, but for the public space activation portion, they do not have the resources to do more outreach. Board Member Rosen agreed that the presentation was very helpful and informative. He asked if there is a Council directive to advance streateries. Director McLaughlin commented that there is controversy around streateries. She noted that the public space typologies just provide a menu of tools for where they could expand public space in the right of way for people needs and not just mobility. Streateries is just one example of what could happen. Board Member Rosen expressed appreciation for the context and encouraged staff to share it that way. Director McLaughlin agreed and noted the need to have these conversations for all neighborhood districts and not just the downtown area. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 14, 2022 Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 8 2.A.a Board Member Kuehn agreed with Board Member Rosen. He encouraged staff to have clear context and language so it is not steering one way or another on any topic. This will help to keep minds open and get better public engagement. Vice Chair Pence commented that the project timeline on the website needs to be updated with current information. There also needs to be more substance. He asked whatever happened to equitable engagement framework. In the public meetings he has attended he hasn't seen much of a difference. Director McLaughlin explained that it takes time to build trust and relationships. Staff believes that the framework will work and over time this will yield results. Vice Chair Pence asked for an update on the tasks and strategies that they expect will yield results over time. Chair Crank2 agreed that just because they extend an invitation to a group that has been routinely left out doesn't mean that they will just show up. It will take time and advocacy from the non -minority members of the community to encourage others to participate. o PUBLIC HEARINGS c L Q. None Q A. Tree Code Amendments Urban Forest Planner Deb Powers made a PowerPoint presentation regarding Phase II Tree Code Amendments. She stated tonight's focus was on the low-level policy code amendments and that staff will be asking if this general direction is appropriate. The current tree code was adopted in response to the Urban Forest Management Plan Goal IA: Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban forest and consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations. Both the Planning Board and the Council directed staff to do the Phase II Tree Code Amendments in 2022. The project scope for the Phase II Tree Code Amendments is to limit property owner tree removal (major) and consider minor amendments to the current code that would simplify, match industry standardsBMPs, streamline the review process, and address code interpretation issues. She started by reviewing preliminary code amendments that would have no policy level impact. She invited board members to give feedback on their attempts to work through development scenarios she had provided. Vice Chair Pence brought up a project at 240t' and 87t' and noted that developers routinely clearcut the entire lot of trees and replant trees. He asked if this would no longer be possible. Ms. Powers explained that the current code strives to retain as many viable trees as possible while letting the development move ahead in a timely manner. The code requires a certain threshold for tree retention depending on what type of development it is. From there the code acts to prioritize how and what they are retaining. Developers are not able to just pay the fees right off the bat; they are required to show infeasibility if they are unable to retain the required trees. Vice Chair Pence commented that the project site had a cluster of very significant trees that were removed. He wondered if the project could have been worked out in a way to preserve the trees. 2 Chair Crank arrived prior to 7:30 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 14, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 9 Board Member Gladstone asked about the development scenarios provided by staff. Ms. Powers explained these are examples of what the Planning Division reviews. They help to illustrate issues with the current Tree Code. Vice Chair Pence asked about flexibility to allow developers to have sub -minimum setbacks if that will allow the saving of trees. Ms. Powers explained that setbacks are a requirement separate from the Tree Code. The Tree Code does not focus on saving trees in setbacks, but this could be one way to simplify the code. She explained that the Conservation Subdivision Design has incentives to give leeway in development standards if they commit to greater tree retention right from the beginning. Board Member Campbell stated she is also concerned about developers that are able to clearcut. Because of negative examples of this she is opposed to allowing fees in -lieu -of. She is also somewhat against replanting and prefers focusing on saving as many trees as possible upfront with code amendments because replanting often results in poorly maintained plantings. She noted that if developers are paying fees -in -lieu of they will just pass it on to the property owner/renter thereby increasing housing costs in addition to destroying the c environment. She would like to see every possible barrier to using fees in -lieu -of. She asked why they want to 0 focus on no impact policy amendments. She thinks the big clearcutting examples would be more important. 0 L Ms. Powers explained that ultimately the Tree Code is trying to establish a healthy urban forest 20 years from a now. It is a balance between growth/development and tree retention. Not every tree should be retained on a Q development site if it can't sustain development impacts and is not the kind of tree in 20 years that will be part of a healthy urban forest. She agrees with the prioritization of retention, replanting, and then fees -in -lieu as the lowest priority. Finally, she referred to the no -impact policy amendments are just a start to create a basic framework before they move up to the other code amendments. Board Member Campbell expressed concern N about the time it will take to address these small things while damage is allowed to continue. She is looking N forward to addressing the prioritization aspect. T Ms. Powers explained that there are 11 preliminary amendments which fall into the categories of: • Definitions — hazard tree, Limits of Disturbance (LOD), nuisance, qualified professional • Property owner tree removal — clarify emergency tree removal process • Tree retention with development — show development types that require tree retention, add "viable", allow silt fence, strike "must", replace "developer" with "applicant". Board Member Rosen commented that the City needs to reconcile the tension between the desire to have additional housing and the desire to save habitat and trees. They also have to be aware of unintended impacts such as increasing housing costs which conflicts with other goals. He asked if they are looking at legal liability risks related to tree codes. He heard that Kirkland was being sued over their tree code, and a Michigan township went to federal court that said having people who remove trees pay into a tree fund was unconstitutional. He asked for clarification about what constitutes risk (for "tree at risk"). He asked if the City is certifying arborists so they maintain a level of excellence. He wondered about using the phrase, "The director may ..." since it seems subjective. Ms. Powers acknowledged the tension between cost of housing, development, and growth and the loss of canopy cover and habitat. Reconciling this is the purpose of the Tree Code. She commented that Kirkland is not being sued, but the Master Builders of King and Snohomish County have filed a petition with the Growth Management Act Hearings Board on the constitutionality of Kirkland's tree code. Mr. Lien commented that staff has been in consultation with the City Attorney as part of the code development process. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 14, 2022 Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 10 2.A.a Ms. Powers stated that there is a methodology described by the International Society of Arboriculture to come up with a score for the risk of a given tree. The code would refer to this methodology to determine risk. Regarding having certified arborists, she noted that the City requires one of two of five different credentials. She referred to the "director may" verbiage and acknowledged that this is subjective, but it also provides flexibility. This is another point of balance — between predictability and flexibility. Board Member Gladstone commented that in the scenarios the trees had to be planned around the buildings. She recommended looking at this more holistically. For, example, she suggested that maybe the building requirements need to be reconsidered so that the buildings have a smaller footprint to preserve more trees. Perhaps this would result in a smaller, lower -priced building with more trees. Ms. Powers explained that would be a major code amendment, but it could be looked at. Director McLaughlin agreed with looking at the symbiotic relationship between these things. Board Member Gladstone recommending thinking about how they balance the tree code requirements with existing homeowners so they don't end up with disparate impacts. 0 Board Member Campbell said that after listening to the various concerns raised in the discussion tonight, she understood the justification of addressing the "low hanging fruit" first and is supportive of trying to get these 0 minor amendments resolved. a B. Climate Action Plan Update Mr. Lien presented an update on the Climate Action Plan Update process. He gave some background on the Climate Action Plan development process. Highlights of the plan include a Call to Action, a new section on equity, a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory, how the plan is presented in different target sectors, and metrics and tracking. The Call to Action: The Edmonds community has not kept pace with its goals to reduce GHG emissions. Mr. Lien reviewed action the City can take to reduce GHG emissions: • Adopt regulations to require new multifamily and commercial buildings to be 100% electric by 2023. • Require charging infrastructure with new development. • Support mixed -use and transit -oriented development in neighborhood commercial centers. • Coordinate with transit agencies to increase service and improve access to new light rail connections. • Develop an action plan to adapt to sea level rise in Edmonds. The most effective actions that individuals and businesses in Edmonds can take are to: • Replace fossil -fuel burning heating systems, hot water heaters, and cooking equipment powers with electric appliances. • Replace fossil fuel -burning vehicles with electric vehicles. • Reduce vehicle trips by using transit, telecommuting, biking, or walking. • Conserve energy wherever possible, especially energy from fossil fuels. Mr. Lien explained that the since the CAP adoption, the City has upgraded the energy efficiency of city facilities; upgraded the wastewater treatment plant; installed public electric vehicle charging stations; upgraded the city's vehicle fleet; and completed a tree canopy assessment to track coverage and identify gaps. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 14, 2022 Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 11 2.A.a Equity is a new section in the CAP. Climate change impacts frontline communities the most. They often live in denser settings, use transit, conserve energy, and consume less. National studies show that affluent households (above $120,000) produce GHG emissions that are double those of households with income between $40,000 and $80,000. He pointed out on a map that areas with less trees have higher heat impacts than other areas. A key takeaway of the GHG inventory is that Edmonds has not kept to its goals since the 2011 CAP. Two of the biggest causes of GHG emissions remain buildings (50%) and transportation (40%). Most of the strategies in the CAP address these two sectors. There are four main target sectors with strategies, actions, and metrics associated with them. The target sectors are Buildings and Energy; Transportation and Land Use; Environment; and Lifestyles and Consumption. Tracking progress will be an important part of the CAP. c Next steps include refining CAP feedback from July and August workshops. The draft CAP will be available o for review by the end of September. This will be followed by review by the Planning Board and adoption by the City Council. After this, staff will implement actions and likely incorporate elements into the 0 Comprehensive Plan update. Mike Clugston is working on the schedule for different code amendments coming a up. He will be giving a presentation to Council on this next week. Q Vice Chair Pence asked about plans to expedite retrofitting existing multifamily buildings with charging stations. Mr. Lien explained there are some provisions in the electric vehicle standards that were adopted. Vice Chair Pence recommended finding a way to give a little incentive to do this. Board Member Rosen asked for confirmation that they are looking at a goal of a 40% reduction in GHG. Mr. Lien concurred and added that they have a goal of being carbon neutral with local emissions by 2050. Director McLaughlin agreed that it is a colossal goal considering they have made no progress yet, but she is encouraged by advances in technology. Board Member Rosen suggested they can get a massive reduction in a year by simply outlawing gas leaf blowers. There was some discussion about his calculations and the feasibility of this. Board Member Gladstone encouraged the City to have coordination with the PUD to make sure they are able to provide alternative sources for the increased demand for electricity. Mr. Lien agreed and noted they would need to do this anyway because of state regulations. There was discussion about needed code amendments to support homeowners and businesses in making desired changes. Board Member Campbell referred to the requirements for new commercial and residential buildings to be fully electric by 2023 and recommended education and outreach for homeowners and businesses who are remodeling or upgrading. Mr. Lien agreed and stated there are action items specifically related to this. Director McLaughlin agreed. Board Member Gladstone noted that education only goes so far, but financial incentives have been very effective with water issues. Director McLaughlin concurred that incentives are effective; development of a green building incentive program is expected to be part of the 2023 work plan. Mr. Lien added that there is an action item related to providing financial assistance, grants, or low -interest loans for installation of solar projects or energy efficient projects, particularly with affordable housing. Board Member Campbell commended staff on the amount of work and detail on this draft and presentation. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 14, 2022 Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 12 2.A.a Staff reviewed the extended agenda and noted tonight was Chair Crank's last meeting. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Crank stated it has been a very educational 6t/2 years. She is excited about her new role, but it is taking a lot of time and focus that make it time for her to retire her position on the Planning Board. She thanked everyone for the support and education. She is pleased with the increased diversity on the board (renters, homeowners, age). She hopes it continues to diversify and to promote equity in the conversations around land use, zoning, and planning. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS c Vice Chair Pence thanked Chair Crank and stated she has been a good chair to work with and runs a good o meeting. He thanked her for her advice and support and stated he will miss her. 0 L Board Member Gladstone wished Chair Crank the best in her next journey. She appreciates her work on the a board and the welcome Chair Crank gave to her when she started on the board. Q Board Member Rosen thanked Chair Crank for her service to the City, for serving as chair, and for her consistent and gentle voice reminding them to consider impacts to all members of the community. He thanked her for her easy laugh. He stated he knows they will continue to benefit through her work at the CityClub, with the Airport Commission, with the Hazel Miller Foundation, with the Edmonds International Women's Day, and her efforts to bring professional women's hockey to the area. He stated that she will be missed. Student Representative Distelhorst thanked Chair Crank for teaching her about leadership. She is glad to have served with her on the Planning Board. Board Member Campbell thanked Chair Crank for helping her get started and established. She is sorry she didn't get a chance to work with her longer. She congratulated Chair Crank on her new role and stated she makes a big impact on people's lives. Board Member Cloutier thanked Chair Crank for her service and stated she was an outstanding representative for the city's neighborhoods. Board Member Kuehn congratulated Chair Crank on her new endeavor. He stated she has been a great partner on the Planning Board. He knows she will continue to be a great citizen for everyone in Edmonds. He thanked her for her service and said he looks forward to seeing her around. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 14, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 13 2.A.b CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Webinar Meeting September 28, 2022 Chair Pence called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Board Member Rosen read the Land Acknowledgement. Board Members Present Roger Pence, Chair Matt Cheung Richard Kuehn Mike Rosen Lily Distelhorst (student rep) Board Members Absent Beth Tragus-Campbell (excused) Judi Gladstone (excused) (newly elected Vice Chair) Todd Cloutier Staff Present Kernen Lien, Planning Division Manager Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Brad Shipley, Senior Planner READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 MINUTES a Chair Pence noted that board members had been mis-titled as commissioners in some places. He also requested more detail about the nice comments that had been made regarding Alicia Crank's service. There was consensus to send the minutes back for correction. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. Williamson referred to the Reimagining Neighborhoods and Streets presentation at the September 14 meeting. During the presentation Development Services Director McLaughlin had presented a draft map and nine new street types. He stated that Director McLaughlin had said the land use and zoning of the adjacent areas would need to correspond to the new street types. This seems to mean that there will be a significant amount of rezoning in Edmonds. He requested clarification on this at some point. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 14 2.A.b Chair Pence responded that any change to the zoning code would need to come through the Planning Board. It would also have to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which is just at the beginning phase of a major rewrite. There are a lot of steps that would have to happen before they get to anything like the changes Mr. Williamson was talking about. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public Hearing on BD Designated Street Front Senior Planner Mike Clugston made a presentation regarding the BD2 designated street front (DSF). He stated the meeting objectives would be to discuss the proposed permanent BD2 DSF map and updated use table, discuss market demand analysis and recommendations from the consultant, take public comment, and make a r recommendation to Council. He compared maps showing the Council's interim extended DSF map and the proposed permanent BD2 DSF o map which would extend "the blue line" to all BD2 parcels to be consistent with the Downtown Mixed Commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan. This was the consensus that came out of the Planning Q Board/EDC meeting in August. He recapped requirements for DSF which include commercial use within the Q first 45 feet of the "blue line", 12-foot minimum ground floor height (15 feet in BDI), and specific design y standards. He reviewed the consultant Otak's market demand analysis takeaways. They concluded that one floor of residential over ground floor commercial is not economically feasible for most boutique developers. Two floors residential over ground floor commercial is economically feasible but exceeds the 30' height limit. The consultant recommended a zoning change of a minor increase in building height (2'-5') to allow "two over one" development. This would make a three-story development feasible in those locations. The Planning Board and EDC had previously recommended extending the ground floor requirements but also taking a look at zoning changes that would be needed to implement the extended "blue line". Along with the changes to the map was the changes to the BD Uses table to clarify ambiguities, fill in blanks in uses created by Ordinance 3955, and reference ground floor in ECDC 16.43.030.13 for locational requirements. Mr. Clugston concluded that if they are fully extending DSF to all BD2 parcels, staff recommends future work on a code amendment to increase height limits to allow three stories to feasibly work in the BD2 zone. Public Comments: Mr. Williamson referred to the recommendation to increase heights 2'-5'. He noted there is a big difference between two feet and five feet and asked what was really necessary to meet the goal of three stories. Mr. Clugston replied that the recommendation from the consultant was a range. He thought that this might depend on the typography of the site but noted they could check with the consultant to see if there is a more specific number. Discussion: Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 15 2.A.b MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL THAT THEY MAKE PERMANENT THE FULLY EXTENDED DSF TO ALL BD2 PARCELS, APPROVE THE UPDATED USE TABLE, AND THAT THEY CONSIDER CODE AMENDMENTS DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE TO INCREASE HEIGHT LIMITS. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG. Board Member Rosen emphasized that he intentionally was not bundling the motion for the extended DSF to all BD2 parcels with the increased height limits but that he was just recommending that Council consider it. Board Member Cheung agreed with Board Member Rosen's recommendation to not bundle the two issues because the increased height limits will likely be a hot topic. Chair Pence added that when they get to the point of detailed rewriting of the zoning code, they will probably r want to look at other sites within the Downtown Business zones. This will be after the Comprehensive Plan update process is complete. 0 Board Member Kuehn spoke in support of the motion. He agreed that more work needs to be done before he is ready to recommend a height increase. 0 0. Q. a THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update Planning Manager Lien gave an update on the Comprehensive Plan Update. Comprehensive Plan Branding: PRR was the consultant selected to help with the branding and came up with the "Everyone's Edmonds" branding. They also developed some templates and mini surveys. They provided some translation services and looked through past outreach materials. Six -week Themed Visioning Outreach: The work with PRR led into a community -guided visioning process which was a six -week themed outreach on key topics. These key topics included Identity, Quality of Life, Economic Growth, Environment, Culture, and Livability and Land Use. The approach involved tabling at local events, coffee chats in various neighborhood centers, some walk and talks, a panel discussion, and a community survey. One of the most successful parts of the outreach was the yard signs. These greatly increased the number of comments on the survey. The overall outreach goal was to solicit 3,500 comments from the community and over 8,500 comments were received. Over 600 comments were received from events and nearly 7,900 were received from the community survey. Visioning Next Steps: The next step will be to organize the comments by theme and evaluate the results. A draft vision statement and community values will be developed based on the outreach results. There will be a presentation to the Planning Board and Council followed by a public reveal of the draft on November 5. Feedback will be collected on the draft visioning and it will again be presented to the Planning Board and to the Council for final adoption. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 16 2.A.b Comprehensive Plan Update Workplan Overview: Over the next couple months there will be a lot of work behind the scenes getting ready for Comprehensive Plan Update. The Core Project Team will be a multi- disciplinary team of key staff involved with review and development of various elements. There will also be a Community Champions Advisory Committee which is one of the suggestions that came out of the Equitable Engagement Framework as a way to get some of the underrepresented communities involved in the process. They are also looking at establishing a Boards & Commissions Advisory Committee which would include representatives from all the city boards and commissions who would participate in development of the Comprehensive Plan and report back to the various boards and commissions. There will still be detailed briefs back to the Planning Board, Economic Development Commission, and other boards, but the Boards & Commissions Advisory Committee would be one way to keep boards and commissions involved throughout the process. There will be more consultants involved as needed for various tasks related to development of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Lien reviewed the project timeline. Adoption is due at the end of 2024. Visioning will be wrapping up this year, and scoping will begin this winter. Neighborhood scenario development and concurrency reviews will be happening this winter. 2023 will be spent developing the draft documents to have them ready for early 2024. Comments and Questions: Chair Pence referred to the comments received and asked how many unique individuals that represented. Senior Planner Brad Shipley replied they did not always measure individual persons. He clarified that they received 8,500 comments; this did not represent 8,500 individuals. There were close to 600 responses to the full survey which only allowed one individual per survey. The mini surveys had around 100 responses each week, but some people may have answered multiple surveys so it is hard to know how many people this represents. Board Member Rosen commented there is value in knowing the number of responses even though they don't know the exact number of people who responded. He cautioned against leading people to believe there were 8,500 participants. He then questioned the order of the project timeline which seems to show neighborhood scenario development before the Comprehensive Plan development. Mr. Shipley explained that the citywide visioning is what they are doing first. This will be overarching and broad and should guide the rest of the work on the Comprehensive Plan. Getting into the neighborhood level planning is just talking to neighborhoods about what they would like to see in the future. Director McLaughlin agreed with comments to be clear about characterizing the number of comments. She spoke to the value of neighborhood planning but stressed the importance of linking back to a citywide conversation about where we are accommodating growth. Board Member Cheung referred to the number of comments and suggested adding an estimated number of individuals to clarify that the number of responses is different than the number of individuals. Chair Pence referred to the City's website for Comprehensive Plan Updates and noted that under Initial Steps there are two sections — one on waterfront issues and one on gap analysis regarding equity and climate. He noted there is no information under the second item and asked for an update. Mr. Lien explained that ECONorthwest had been hired to review the current Comprehensive Plan for equity issues in policies and implementation. They identified a number of policies to be looked at in more detail. As part of that work, they also looked at public engagement. There was some overlap with this and the work that was done on the Equitable Engagement Framework. He indicated he would get those up on the website or at least distribute them to the Planning Board. Chair Pence asked how there will be a community conversation after November 5 when they unveil the draft Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 17 2.A.b visioning statement. Director McLaughlin explained they are looking at ways that can help to validate whether they got the community vision right. They will substantiate the vision with documentation and data that will be robust from PRR. It will be a defensible and transparent process. Chair Pence said he hopes that once the draft visioning statement is revealed there is a chance for some good, robust civic conversation. Director McLaughlin pointed out that the community vision won't require a public hearing process but she hopes the Planning Board will provide feedback, especially through the survey. Chair Pence said he thinks the process ought to allow for residents to hear responses from each other. Board Member Rosen said he liked the idea of creating a group of representatives from all the boards and commissions. This is a great way to get feedback. ELECTION OF OFFICERS N N r Chair Pence explained that with the loss of Alicia Crank they are down one member. He has defaulted into the position of Chair. They also need to elect a Vice Chair. 0 Mr. Lien said he couldn't find any rules or procedures for the Planning Board but recommended confmningcc > Roger Pence as Chair and electing a Vice Chair through the end of the year. They will have another election of Q officers in December. He noted that Beth Campbell moved from the alternate position to Alicia Crank's Q position. fit MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG, TO ELECT ROGER PENCE AS CHAIR, FILLING OUT THE REST OF THE TERM VACATED BY ALICIA CRANK. There were no other nominations. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO ELECT ROGER PENCE AS CHAIR. Chair Pence said he had a conversation with Board Member Gladstone about serving as Vice Chair. She was interested in doing the job but wasn't able to attend tonight's meeting. He solicited any other nominations or volunteers. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG, TO NOMINATE JUDI GLADSTONE TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR, FILLING OUT THE TERM PREVIOUSLY HELD BY ROGER PENCE. There were no other nominations. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO ELECT JUDI GLADSTONE AS VICE CHAIR. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Pence reviewed the extended agenda. There is a joint meeting with the City Council planned for October 4; however, there is a chance that the Board may be bumped to a different date because the Council has a packed meeting. He will let the Board know as soon as possible. He discussed possible topics of conversation. Board Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 18 Member Rosen encouraged Chair Pence to reach out to the Council President to see what topics they would like to hear about. Chair Pence concurred. He commented that the Council President had expressed an interest in having a member of the Planning Board present when staff presents Planning Board recommendations to the Council. He recapped a situation that happened with staff last year regarding a recommendation they disagreed with and thought this might be a good solution. Chair Pence said he would like to see a topic on the extended agenda for the Five Corners Plaza which is for sale. The zoning for this is Neighborhood Business which he believes needs to be updated. Mr. Lien agreed but wasn't sure about the timing of updating this. Mr. Lien asked about the Board's preference to have a special meeting on November 30. All board members indicated a willingness to hold the meeting if it is needed. Mr. Lien said he would come back with more information on this at the next meeting. r c PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS 0 None `° 0 L Q PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS a None ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 19 5.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2022 Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department - Q3 Update Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services Prepared By: Angie Feser Narrative This is the 2022 third quarter update of the Parks, Recreation & Human Services (PRHS) Department's accomplishments for the months of July through September to the Parks & Planning Board. Attached is a more detailed list of the department's work for the three months. In addition, a PowerPoint presentation is planned for the October 121h Board meeting to provide additional information and answer questions. Highlights for 2022 3rd Quarter (additional items found in attached Accomplishment List) 1. Administration: Agreements for concessionaires (6) and special events (1) completed. Oversight for 5 special events plus Summer Market, supporting Library renovation and operating and capital budget preparation and submittal. Salmon Safe certification draft report reviewed by city council. Continued work on possible parkland acquisitions 2. Civic Playfield Park Protect: Construction continuing with amenities being installed such as athletic field turf and lights, inclusive playground, shade structure, concrete path, restroom foundation, and site underground utilities. All benches and tables adoptions sold (21 total). 3. Park Planning: Parks Maintenance greenhouse permit submittal completed and using new Job Order Contracting services for installation. New Parks Planner/Project Manager position started July 18th. Yost Park bridge #6 closed indefinitely. Off -site stormwater mitigation project (96th Ave Infiltration) is out to bid with construction slated for winter. 4. Parks Maintenance: Memorial bench replacements at Marina Beach Park, supported 5 special events plus both Summer and Uptown Markets. Replenished safety fall material at all city playgrounds. Yost pool and Spray Park operations at 7 days/week and Spray Park had seasonal closure mid -September. 5. Recreation and Cultural Services Programs: Q3 Permits - 46 shelter permits, 560 field rental hours and 50 gym rental hours. Programming included new weekly Summer Day Camp and 24 contracted youth camps; Adult Softball (63 teams) and Pickleball (18 teams) Leagues and new fitness classes. Supported public access for all city board and commission meetings at the Waterfront Center. Five Discovery Programs week-long outdoor summer camps, 8 Discovery Interpretive Tables at Olympic Beach, City Park, and Mathay-Ballinger Park (first City program Packet Pg. 20 5.A there) and Beach Rangers patrolled the waterfront every day from Memorial Day through Labor Day weekend. 6. Arts & Cultural Division Effective September 1, 2022 this division was transferred to the Community Services/Economic Development Department. Our department will still manage the division's budget through the end of the year to support an easier transition. Currently the staff will remain at the Frances Anderson Center although the remainder of their new department is housed at City Hall. 7. Human Services Division: Supported Snohomish County's efforts to purchase America's Best Value Inn for an enhanced shelter. Provided Social Services support at each Edmonds Community Court. Accepted over 50 referrals and have 38 engaged clients. Completed integration of contracted service provider (social worker) with Police. Began outreach from City Hall Neighborhood Office to individuals along the Hwy 99 corridor. Provided ongoing support for distribution of ARPA funding through Household Support Grant program. Coordinated with Council Legislative Aide on Suicide Awareness and Prevention website. Coordinated with the Food Bank and Municipal Court to provide food to clients attending Community Court; procured refrigerator for perishable food. Coordinated with Snohomish County to relocate 5 motel voucher recipients to different motels while America's Best Value Inn is being purchased. Recommendation This agenda item is for informational purposes, there is no need for a formal recommendation or action. Attachments: PRHS 2022 Q3 Accomplishments Packet Pg. 21 5.A.a Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department 2022 Quarter 3 Accomplishments July 1 - September 30, 2022 Administration 1. Effective September 1, 2022 the Arts & Cultural Division transferred to the Community Services/Economic Development Department. Our department will still manage the division's budget through the end of the year to support an easier transition. 2. New Parks Planner/Project Manager, Kyle Woods, started on July 18tn 3. Completed sale and contracts for all Civic Park memorial benches and picnic tables (17 benches & 5 picnic tables) and 4 additional benches citywide. 4. Facilitated and provided oversight of 6 concessions agreements (Kool Kids Ice Cream, Magnolia Forest Preschool, Quiet Heart Wilderness School; Rowlee Shaved Ice and Pedalheads, and Cascade Swim Club) 5. Finalized special event agreement for 2022 Oktoberfest. Contract authorized by City Council. 6. Facilitated and provided City oversight for the Summer Market, 41n of July Celebration, Taste Edmonds, Classic Car Show, Safety and Disaster Event and Oktoberfest events. 7. Working with Development Services and Facilities on Library flood restoration. 8. Submitted 2023 budget decision packages (operating & capital); updated year end estimates and completed 2023-2027 CIP/CFP to reflect recently adopted Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan update. 9. Identified a missing link in online feedback forms; resolved the issue and replied to 300 feedback forms. 10. Completed the build out of a recreation coordinator office in the Anderson Center. 11. Working with Development Services Department on Hwy 99 Revitalization, Redefining Streets & Public Spaces Design and Green Streets projects. Parks Planning & Projects 1. Civic Center Playfield construction project is still proceeding well with sod installation of athletic fields and open turf area, progress of the inclusive playground, (pre -fabricated) restroom foundation and utilities (delivery scheduled for October 18, 2022), shade structure frame, irrigation system, concrete walkway, rubberized track base and painting and striping of multipurpose courts. 2. Parks Maintenance Greenhouse variance approved by Hearings Examiner. Permit documents are being routed to the City planning department for building permit approval. Construction is anticipated to occur December 2022 —January 2023. Packet Pg. 22 5.A.a 3. 961h Ave Infiltration project went out to bid late September with related bid opening scheduled for October 11, 2022. This project will mitigate the stormwater impacts for the Civic Center Playfield project. America Rescue Plan Act funding for was approved for this project. 4. The draft Salmon Safe Certification report was to City Council. Initial approval was given to negotiate certification conditions and provide additional information about estimated impacts to city resources. 5. Yost Park bridge #6 was closed indefinitely on October 1, 2022. 6. Identified pedestrian improvements landscape beds for Dayton Street, Walnut Street, Main Street, and 196th ST SW for planting design and installation. 7. Started development of a parks asset inventory to assist with inventory control and management, asset life cycle management, strategic planning, and parks maintenance scheduling and planning. 8. A comprehensive project tracking sheet is being produced to better track capital, small works, and maintenance projects. 9. Final step of the SR 104 Downtown Edmonds sign was completed including fall hydroseeding to disturbed area as required by WSDOT for permit. 10. With Rich Lindsay's announced intent to retire, work is beginning to document his 50+ year experience and knowledge the Edmonds park system history. Park Maintenance 1. Continued operations of Yost Pool and Hazel Miller Spray Park 7 days a week. Yost Pool hot tub opened for use. 2. ADA parking stall improvements at Mathay Ballinger and Pine Street Parks. 3. Replaced 6 memorial benches at Marina Beach Park, work includes re -powder coating and plaque refurbishment. 4. Replenished safety fall material at city playgrounds. 5. Hydroseed around SR-104 Welcome to Edmonds sign. 6. Supported special events including Uptown Markets, Summer Market, 411 of July Celebration, Taste Edmonds, Classic Car Show, Safety and Disaster Event and Oktoberfest 7. Supported the installation of new art work for Floretum Garden club at 6th & Bell 8. Assisted in the planning for security fence at Public Safety building and parking lot Recreation Division 1. Rentals — o Q3 had 46 shelter rental permits; 446 permits year to date. (100 more than 2021) o Q3 had 560 hours of field rental permits; 3,810 hours year to date. o Q3 had 50 hours in gym rental reservations; 510 hours year to date. 2. Designed and published the digital Fall 2022 CRAZE Recreation Guide. 2 Packet Pg. 23 5.A.a 3. Completed the re -instated Edmonds Day Camp Program, running for 10 weeks and with 312 registrations of children entering grades 2-6. Through funding from the SEEK Grant, a total of 105 full and 24 wrap -around care ($21,250) scholarships were provided. 4. Managed 21 contracted youth camps at the Frances Anderson Center and local parks serving more than 180 youth over 10 weeks of summer programming. 5. Started the school year at the Meadowdale Preschool program with full enrollment in both the morning and afternoon classes. 6. Adult Athletics program completion o Summer Adult Softball leagues (54 teams) o Senior Softball leagues (9 teams) o Summer Pickleball leagues (18 teams) o (After a 2-year pause) Volleyball leagues (14 teams) o (After a 2-year pause) 3 on 3 Basketball league (6 teams) 7. Staff set up and monitored nearly 30 city Board and Commission zoom meetings along with scheduling 21 non-profit organization meetings at Edmonds Waterfront Center. 8. Offered four Outdoor Movie Nights and for the first time, located them at different Edmonds parks. Expanding into various neighborhoods was very well received many requests to repeat for next year. Locations and approximate attendance included Frances Anderson Center (500), Hickman Park 375, Seaview Park (250) and City Park (250). Sponsorships totaled $3,050 and $734 was raised for program scholarships through concession stand sales. 9. Several new fitness classes were added to fall offerings. Mama Barre has grown rapidly, and added a second class due to its popularity. lyengar Yoga is adding three classes and a new program of Zumba/Zumba Moms classes beginning in October. 10. Utilizing Constant Contact to send regular monthly emails with registration information, new programs, special events, park updates and more. Customer email list size: 7,039 with a 52% average open rate. 11. Facebook engagement: 1,342 followers (177 new from Q2), reach is up 217%, page visits up 39% 12. Instagram engagement: 867 followers (67 new from Q2), reach is down 6.4%, profile visits down 40.9% 13. Cemetery Advisory Board has recruited 2 new members and now have a full panel of 7 community board members. Environmental Education 1. Five Discovery Programs week-long outdoor summer camps. 61 kids served 2. Hosted a total of 8 Discovery Interpretive Tables at Olympic Beach, City Park, and Mathay-Bal linger Park (first City program there). 3. Beach Rangers patrolled the waterfront everyday Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day weekend for a total of 99 days. 3 Packet Pg. 24 5.A.a Human Services Division 1. Supported Snohomish County's efforts to purchase an enhanced shelter in South County utilizing ARPA funding. Acquisition of America's Best Value Inn was accepted by County Council in August 2022. 2. Provided Social Services support at each Edmonds Community Court. 3. Accepted over 50 referrals and currently have 38 clients that are engaged, or outreach is in process; engaged individuals have presented with 40 identified needs and 26 of those needs have had a closed loop referral (need met). 4. Completed integration of contracted service provider (social worker) with Police to include call outs, ride-alongs, attendance in staff meetings and inclusion in staff emails. 5. Secured city vehicle to ensure social worker is identifiable during outreach and EPD callouts. 6. Established relationship with City Hall Neighborhood Office and began outreach from that location to individuals along the HWY 99 corridor. 7. Provided ongoing support for distribution of ARPA funding through Household Support Grant program. 8. Updated supply of items needed for the Urgent Needs Program to include non- perishable food and essential needs care items which are distributed by Edmonds Police Department, City Hall Neighborhood Office and Social Worker. 9. Coordinated with Council Legislative Aide on Suicide Awareness and Prevention website. 10. Coordinated with the Food Bank and Municipal Court to provide food to clients attending Community Court; procured refrigerator for perishable food. 11. Coordinated with Snohomish County to relocate 5 motel voucher recipients to different motels while America's Best Value Inn is being purchased. Youth Commission 1. Held a summer retreat at Hutt Park and pulled invasive plant species while getting to know each other and discussing potential projects for the upcoming year. 2. Recruited 13 applicants for the 8 Commission vacancies. 3. Held first two meetings of the year in -person with full attendance and excitement about no longer meeting via Zoom. 4 Packet Pg. 25 7.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2022 Presentation of Proposed 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services Prepared By: Angie Feser Background/History The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects. These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. Staff Recommendation Hold public hearing on October 26, 2022. Narrative The 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are being presented in one document with project lists that identify Capital Facility projects and project information sheets for all projects and programs. The Public Works and Utilities Department proposed 2023-2028 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1. The Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department proposed 2023-2028 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 2. Following the Planning Board's Public Hearing and recommendation, the City Council will also hold a Public Hearing prior to final approval. Attachments: Parks CIP—CFP 2023-2028 2023-2028 Public Works CIP-CFP Packet Pg. 26 1 EDMOND ��- PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES 2023-2028 PROPOSED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM �fe r �1 t�r��r• ..'��. ff�'. ram_.•.' �ti lw 1 � f � � � ` t �,• bpi `�r � l - � ..: ,.,._. of - ,:. .. ;.w:,. �}•"- f LAP' rlAlln�lY - 9 .i. N 1• � p � ,__q J -yt. •R t 6 EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Table of Contents Director's Letter................................................................ 2 CIP/CFP Worksheets.......................................................3-6 Project Descriptions......................................................7-27 Program Descriptions...................................................28-31 Acquisition Descriptions...............................................32-34 FundDetail..................................................................... 35 Fund 332 Detail............................................................36-37 Fund 125 Detail.............................................................. 38 Fund 126 Detail.............................................................. 39 Fund 143 Detail.............................................................. 40 Fund 137 Detail.............................................................. 41 Project Comparison........................................................ 42 7.A.a EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES October 12, 2022 Members of the City Council, Parks & Planning Board, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds, It is an honor to present the 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) & Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CIP/CFP serve as a long-range planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources, both secured and unsecured. The CIP/CFP is updated each year and presented in conjunction with the operating budget. In 2022 the Parks, Recreation and Human Services Department completed the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan based largely on citizens priorities and multiple rounds of review prior to adoption. The 2022 PROS Plan goals are: 1. Encourage and facilitate meaningful public involvement in park and recreation planning. 2. Decrease barriers and provide increased opportunities for participation and representative cultural, heritage and art programs, events representing the diversity of Edmonds demographics. 3. Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of year-round recreation opportunities and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural identity and the natural environment. 4. Preserve and pursue opportunities to expand public access and enjoyment of Edmonds' waterfront. 5. Conserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education. 6. Adapt to climate change and increase local park system resiliency by improving environmental conditions, stewardship and sustainability in parks, trails, open spaces and recreation facilities within planning, development, maintenance, and operations. 7. Provide a varied and inclusive suite of recreation opportunities and experiences to promote health and wellness, year-round activity and social engagement. The adopted 2022 PROS plan included a CIP document which is consistent with this 2023-28 CIP/CFP. In 2023 the Parks, Recreation and Human Services Department will focus on completion of the largest ever City of Edmonds Parks Capital project, the redevelopment of the 8-acre Civic Center Playfields. In addition, the department will continue to focus on deferred maintenance of existing parks and recreation facilities and playground renovations and acquisition of additional parkland to fill system gaps in park services and to address inequities in parkland distribution. Your Parks, Recreation and Human Services Department is proud to serve the citizens of Edmonds and we look forward keeping the Edmonds Parks safe and enjoyable for all. Sincerely, Angie Feser Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director 425-771-0256 Angie. Feser@ EdmondsWA.gov Page 2 Packet Pg. 29 2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7.A.a Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Tot< # Johnson Property R2 Demolition and securing existing site, Master plan for park use. Site $ 200,000 $ $ 82,000 $ $ $ $ 282,0( P5 development not included in estimate. Meadowdale Playfields R3 Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with TBD TBD TBD $ $ $ $ existing ILA. To include addition of dugout roofs, light replacement and playground upgrade. D5 Mathay Ballinger Park D6 Park improvements to include a new paved loop pathway, permanent $ 499,300 $ $ $ $ $ $ 499,3( D7 restrooms and a small shelter with picnic tables. R9 Yost Park & Pool R4 Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include a playground $ 257,500 $ 154,300 $ 546,400 $ $ $ $ 958,2( R6 replacement, resurface of tennis courts, pool upgrades and trail, bridge R11 and boardwalk repairs/replacement. Columbarium Expansion - Phase II D8 Expansion of the current columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery $ $ 159,100 $ $ $ $ $ 159,1( Trust Fund 137. R7 Olympic Beach Park $ $ 53,000 $ $ $ $ $ 53,0( Renovation of existing restrooms. D10 Pine Street Park D11 Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, $ $ 164,400 $ $ $ $ $ 164,4( D12 canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway. R8 Sierra Park $ $ 185,700 $ $ $ $ $ 185,7( Playground replacement. Neighborhood Park SE 1 X D13 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds. $ $ 79,600 $ 819,500 $ $ $ $ 899,1( $1.5M parkland acquisition listed below. Waterfront Walkway P3 Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to $ $ 515,000 $ 819,500 $ $ $ $ 1,334,5( D14 Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements. a_ U a ILL U 00 N O N A N O N d N O O_ O a` O c O M c CD N d L a 00 N O N A N O N a LL U I a_ U N R a c d t U ca r Q Packet Pg. 30 2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7.A.a Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Tot< # R12 Maplewood Hill Park $ $ $ 144,900 $ $ $ $ 144,9( Playground replacement. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Master Plan and Master Plan implementation of the Marsh to daylight the P4 connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two fresh water creeks X D9 providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary and natural tidal $ $ $ 5,900,700 $ $ $ $ 5,900,7( D1 exchange. Restoration expenses are not included in this estimate. ($8M Acquisition expense listed below). D16 Elm Street Park D17 Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, $ $ $ $ 225,100 $ $ $ 225,1( R14 small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration. Neighborhood Park SR99 X D15 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ $ $ $ 928,500 $ $ $ 928,5( Edmonds. ($1.5M parkland acquisition listed below). Neighborhood Park SE 2 X Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ $ $ $ 84,400 $ 869,500 $ $ 953,9( D18 Edmonds. ($2M parkland acquisition listed below). 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Prioritized in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and State certified P8 Creative District. Improvements encourage pedestrian traffic and provide $ $ $ $ 2,251,000 $ 6,955,600 $ $ 9,206,6( D19 visual connection between ECA and downtown contributing to economic vitality. Funding TBD. X P1 Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building $ $ $ $ 1,125,500 $ 4,637,100 $ $ 5,762,6( D2 Replace and/or renovate deteriorating building in City Park. R16 Seaview Park $ $ $ $ $ 417,900 $ $ 417,9( Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades. X R15 Pool Replacement $ $ $ $ $ $ 23,881,000 $ 23,881,0( Replacement of the existing pool. Location, design and funding TBD. a_ U IL IL U w N O N M N O N O N O IZ O L a O C O to c O N d a` 00 N O N M N O N IL u_ U I a_ U rn L R a C m E t U ca r Q Packet Pg. 31 2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7.A.a (A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS $ 956,800 $ 1,311,100 1 $ 8,313,000 1 $ 4,614,500 1 $ 12,880,100 $ 23,881,000 $ 51,956,5( Costs inflated at 3% per year PARKS CIP PROGRAMS Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program R17 This ongoing program allocates funds for the regular and deferred maintenance, $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,0( repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. Signage & Wayfinding R10 Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a $ $ 51,500 $ $ $ $ $ 51,5( consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system. Playground Upgrade Program R13 Annual upgrades of playground equipment and fall surfacing to provide $ $ $ $ 197,000 $ 202,900 $ 209,000 $ 608,9( additional inclusive playgrounds/facilities providing access for children of all ages and abilities. Debt Service and Interfund Transfers Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to $ 123,000 $ 148,000 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 $ 148,000 $ 1,013,0( Engineering for Capital Project Support. (B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 123,000 $ 148,000 $ 198,000 1 $ 395,000 $ 400,900 $ 357,000 $ 1,621,9( PARKLAND ACQUISITION X A2 Neighborhood Park SE 1 $ 1,500,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,500,0( Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. X A3 Neighborhood Park SR99 $ $ 1,545,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1,545,0( Acquisition of parkland in near SR 99. X A4 Neighborhood Park SE 2 $ $ $ 2,185,500 $ $ $ $ 2,185,5( Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) X Al Acquisition of the Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh $ $ $ 8,741,800 $ $ $ $ 8,741,8( restoration. A5 Interurban Trail $ $ $ $ $ $ 895,585 $ 895,5f Extension and acquisition (C) SUBTOTAL - PARKLAND ACQUISITION $ 1,500,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 10,927,300 $ $ $ 895,585 $ 14,867,81 a V IL LL U 00 N O N M N O N d N O IZ O L a O c O M C ry to d L IL 00 N O N M N O N a LL U I a_ U rn R a c ry E t U ca r Q Packet Pg. 32 2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7.A.a (D) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B+C) $ 2,579,800 $ 3,004,100 $ 19,438,300 $ 5,009,500 $ 13,281,000 $ 25,133,585 $ 68,446,21 PARKS CIP REVENUE 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Toti Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I Fund 126 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,01 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II Fund 125 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 10,000,0( Park Impact Fees Fund 332 100 $ 848,350 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 3,098,3. Tree Fund 143 Land Acquisition $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 1!194,01 Cemetery Trust Fund 137 Columbarium Expansion $ 70,971 $ 73,270 $ 67,728 $ 69,864 $ 72,108 $ 74,463 $ 428,4( Operating Contribution General Fund $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Investment Interest (3%) $ 42,255 $ 54,144 $ 64,828 $ 74,243 $ 84,030 $ 94,111 $ 413,6: Donations $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Bond Proceeds $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Secured Grants $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Unsecured Grants/Funding $ $ $ 7,263,500 $ 41276,900 $ 12,462,200 $ 23,881,000 $ 47,883,6( (E) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE $ 3,360,576 $ 2,976,413 $ 9,745,056 $ 6,770,007 $ 14,967,338 $ 26,398,574 $ 64,217,9E Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 (F) Beginning Fund Balance (Funds 332 + 332 100) $ 2,383,820 $ 2,444,625 $ 1,802,269 $ (8,689,703) $ (7,563,660) $ (6,598,430) (E) Revenue $ 3,360,576 $ 2,976,413 $ 9,745,056 $ 6,770,007 $ 14,967,338 $ 26,398,574 (D) Expenditures $ 2,579,800 $ 3,004,100 $ 19,438,300 $ 5,009,500 $ 13,281,000 $ 25,133,585 (G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D) $ 3,164,596 $ 2,416,938 $ (7,890,975) $ (6,929,196) $ (5,877,322) $ (5,333,440) Project Type: A Acquisition P Master Planning D Development New R Replacement / Upgrade a_ U a LL U 0 N 0 N M N 0 N O N O O_ O a O C O Id C O N d a` 6 Packet Pg. 33 2023-2028 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan PROJECTS h �' mot,`_ �• n� EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 7 Packet Pg. 34 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Johnson Property - R2 & PS 9309 Bowdoin Way Project Summary: This project is the demolition and securing of the 1-acre property donated by Shirley Johnson in 2021. There is a small uninhabitable house, several small outbuildings and historic fruit and nut trees which have all been neglected for years. The site is becoming overrun with invasive plant species including Holly trees and blackberries. By removing the structures and clearing invasives, the city will be able to better start restoration on the many fruit and nut trees. Project Justification: The overgrown vegetation and abandoned buildings create an environment that can attract unwanted visitors and activity to the site which is currently not open to the public. This work aligns with the following 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan Goals and Objectives: Goal 3, Objective 3.7 & 3.10; Goal 5, Objective 5.1; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; and Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.5. 2022 PROS Plan Recommendation #3.1 — Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. Estimated Cost: $282,000 Construction (112) — site demo $200,000 $200,000 Planning & Design (P5) $82,000 $82,000 Total Expenses $200,000 $82,000 $282,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $200,000 $82,000 $282,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $200,000 i $82,000 i $282,000 i a U IL u_ U 0 N O N M N O N N N O am O L a 4- 0 c 0 :r M c a� L a 0 N 0 N M N 0 N IL u_ U I IL_ U M IL c d E z a Page 8 Packet Pg. 35 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Meadowdale Playfields - R3 168`h ST SW, Lynnwood Project Summary: The City of Lynnwood is replacing the existing playground and upgrading to a fully inclusive level of the play structure, will be adding dugout roofs and replacing the light fixtures within a 6-year planning horizon. Project Justification: The cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds and Edmonds School District currently have an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Meadowdale Park for shared cost of capital improvements, renovations and ongoing maintenance. The ILA states "The District and Cities agree to jointly plan for additional capital expenditures for maintenance and replacement costs for the Playfields." Estimated Cost: TBD, negotiations are ongoing with the City of Lynnwood. 2023 2024 2025 2026Total Construction (113) TBD TBD TBD TBD Total Expenses TBD TBD TBD TBD Ending Fund Balance/Impact Fees - 332 TBD TBD TBD TBD Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 TBD TBD TBD TBD Total Revenue TBD I TBD TBD I TBD U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a O c 0 c� c a� a Go N 0 N M N 0 N a u_ U I IL U N Y L IL c am E z r Q Page 9 Packet Pg. 36 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Mathay Ballinger Park - D51 D6 & D7 24100 78th Place West Project Summary: Park improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park to include the addition of a permanent restroom, a small shelter with picnic tables and a paved loop pathway to provide ADA accessibility to the playground and connect the paved Interurban Trail to 78t" Place West street. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan Recommendation #3.3 is to prioritize improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park and upgrade, enhance or replace park amenities, specifically the play amenities. Recommendation 3.5 is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park ... and paved pathway connections in Mathay Ballinger Park. Recommendation 6.4 is to install permanent restrooms at Marina Beach Park and Mathay Ballinger Park. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.6 and Goal 3 Objectives 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9 also align with these upgrades. Estimated Cost: $499,300 Construction (D5) — Paved Loop Pathway $53,000 $53,000 Construction (D7) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $75,000 $75,000 Construction (D6) — Permanent Restroom $371,300 $371,000 Total Expenses $499,300 $499,300 Ending Fund Balance/Impact Fees - 332 $371,300 $371,300 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $128,000 $128,000 Total Revenue 1 $499,300 Funding $0 499,300 $Unsecured E U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� m L a 00 N O N CM N O N a u_ U i a U N L IL c m E z U a r r Q Page 10 Packet Pg. 37 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Yost Park & Pool - R91 R41 R6 & R11 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include a playground replacement, resurface of tennis courts, pool upgrades and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs / replacement. The playground at Yost Park installed in 1995, is 27 years old, has reached the end of its lifecycle, is not ADA accessible and is scheduled to be replaced in 2023. Project Justification: The playground, tennis courts, pool, trails, bridges, and boardwalks are near or at the end of their useful life; ongoing maintenance of these amenities is increasing. To maintain safety amenities should be repaired and/or replaced as supported in the 2022 PROS Plan recommendation 3.1 which is to maintain, renovate or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety; Goal 3.4 replace the playgrounds at ... Yost Memorial Park and 6.2 to implement upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. Estimated Cost: $958,200 Construction (R4)—Trail/Bridge Repair $80,000 Total $80,000 Construction (R6) — Playground Replacement $257,500 $257,500 Construction (R9)—Tennis Court Resurface $74,300 $74,300 Construction (R11) — Pool Upgrades $546,400 $546,400 Total Expenses $257,500 $154,300 $546,400 $958,200 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $257,500 $154,300 $546,400 $958,200 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $257,500 $154,300 $546,400 $958,200 i a U a u_ U ao N O N M N O N N N O am O L (L 4- 0 c 0 :r M c a) 0) a) a` w N O N M N O N a u_ UI a_ U L M a c d E z a Page 11 Packet Pg. 38 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Columbarium Expansion Phase II — D8 820 15th St SW, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Project Summary: Expansion of the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery Trust Fund 137 which accumulates fund balance based on Cemetery usage and revenue generated. Project Justification: As the existing columbarium continues to fill up, it is appropriate to begin planning for the Phase II expansion. The design is complete and since it is continuation of phase improvements, should be relatively simple to implement. Estimated Cost: $159,100 2023 0- Construction (D8) — Columbarium Expansion $159,100 $159,100 Total Expenses $159,100 $159,100 Fund Balance Cemetery Trust — Fund 137 $159,100 $159,100 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $159,100 $0 $159,100 $0 U IL u_ U 0 N O N M N O N N N O am O L a 4- 0 c 0 :r M c a� m a` 0 N O N M N 0 N IL u. U a_ U L M a c as E z M a Page 12 Packet Pg. 39 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Olympic Beach Park - R7 - " 200 Admiral Way, Entrance of the Fishing Pier Project Summary: Renovation of existing restroom. Project Justification: 2022 PROS Plan Recommendation #6 is to make improvements to existing parks as needed to ensure proper maintenance, usability and quality of park features and grounds to remove barriers and improve universal access. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. Estimated Cost: $53,000 Page 13 Packet Pg. 40 Parks & Recreation Pine Street Park - D10, D11 & D12 6th and Pine Street Project Summary: Park improvements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Recommendation #3.1 is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park and paved pathway connections in Mathay Ballinger Park and Pine Street Park. Estimated Cost: $159,100 2023 0- Construction (D10) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $79,600 $79,600 Construction (D11) — Paved Pathway $58,300 $58,300 Construction (D12) — Canopy Shade Trees $26,500 $26,500 Total Expenses $164,400 $164,400 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $164,400 $164,400 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $164,400 so $164,400 so FL a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� a Go N 0 N M N 0 N a u_ U I IL U N Y IL c m E t U M r Q Page 14 Packet Pg. 41 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Sierra Park — R8 81st Ave W & 190th St SW Project Summary: Replacement of the playground and fall surfacing at Sierra Park. The playground is 27 years old and is currently the smallest playground in the park system. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Recommendation #3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. Estimated Cost: $164,400 FL U d LL U Go N O N M N O N N N O a O L a 4. O c 0 c� c a� m a Go N O N CM N 0 N a LL U I IL U N Y L cc IL c m E z U a r r Q Page 15 Packet Pg. 42 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SE 1— P2, D13 Project Summary: Acquire and develop an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan Recommendation #1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. Estimated Cost: $899,100 + Parkland Acquisition 2023 0- Planning— Neighborhood Park SE 1 (132) $79,600 $79,600 Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (D13) $819,500 $819,500 Total Expenses $79,600 $819,500 $899,100 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $79,600 $79,600 Total Revenue $79,600 Unsecured Funding $0 00 $79,600 00 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) a U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L 11 4- 0 c 0 c� c W CA m L Q_ Go N O N M N O N d u_ U I a U N Y L IL c m E z U O r r Q Page 16 Packet Pg. 43 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section - P3 & D14 Beachfront in front of Ebb Tide Condominiums (200 Beach Place) Project Summary: This would connect the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina Beach Park ensuring all individuals, including those with mobility challenges and those pushing strollers can safely enjoy the waterfront. The final missing piece would be constructed in front of the Ebb Tide condominiums in the easement owned by the City of Edmonds. The easement and walkway design are currently under legal review. Project Justification: To provide public access along the waterfront for all individuals. Completion of the walkway would meet ADA requirements, support efforts to keep dogs off of the beaches and was recognized as a high priority by residents participating in the development of the 2022 PROS plan. Estimated Cost: $1,250,000 2023 0- Planning & Design $515,000 $515,000 Construction $819,500 $819,500 Total Expenses $515,000 $819,500 $1,334,500 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $515,000 $515,000 Total Revenue $515,000 Unsecured Funding 00 $515,000 $819,500 a U a- LL U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� m a Go N O N M N O N d LL U i a U N Y L IL c m E z U M r r Q Page 17 Packet Pg. 44 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Maplewood Hill Park — R12 19800 89th PI W Project Summary: Replacement of the existing playground installed in 1985. This playground is 38 years old and is the oldest in the park system. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space Plan Recommendation #3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. Estimated Cost: $144,900 FL U d U- U Go N O N M N O N N N O a O L a 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� m L Go N 0 N CM N O N a e_ U I IL U N Y cc IL c m E z U a r r Q Page 18 Packet Pg. 45 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) - Al, P4, D9 & D1 Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh and property owned by Unocal (Chevron Services Co.) Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh restoring the natural tidal exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including daylighting of Willow Creek within the park. Project Justification: This project will support the 2022 PROS plan recommendation #2.2 — Expand the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary to include the Unocal property. Develop funding strategy for purchase of the Unocal property or negotiate with the State of Washington to have the property become part of the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary. The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow Chinook salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts Estimated Cost: $14,642,500 + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation Continued on next page. a c� IL u_ c) 00 N O N M N O N N N 0 am 0 L IL 4- 0 c 0 M c d m a` 00 N O N M N O N a U. t� i a_ U L M a c d E z 0 a Page 19 Packet Pg. 46 7.A.a Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) — continued. Land Acquisition (Al) $8,741,800 Total $8,741,800 Master Plan (P4) $273,200 $273,200 Master Plan Implementation (D9) $5,627,500 $5,627,500 Restoration (D1) - TBD TBD TBD Total Expenses $14,642,500 $14,642,500 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $273,200 $273,200 Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fee's Bond Proceeds Secured Grants Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition Park Donations Operating Contribution — General Fund Stormwater — Fund 422 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $273,200 00 $273,200 00 Project Accounting #M070 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) d U a u_ U 00 N O N A N O N a� 0 0. 0 IL 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� m L Q_ Page 20 Packet Pg. 47 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Elm Street Park - D16, D17 & R14 a - a t• u_ N O M N 4 E .$5+t�E',�.',xh O .r 7t" & Elm Street m Project Summary: Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter with picnic tables a and habitat restoration. 00 N O Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Recommendation #3.1 is to add amenities to M existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park. N a u_ t� i a Estimated Cost: $225,100 v 2023 Construction (1114) — Habitat Restoration 2024 2025 $56,300 $56,300 Construction (D16) — Nature Playground $84,400 $84,400 Construction (D17) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $84,400 $84,400 Total Expenses $225,100 $225,100 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $168,800 $168,800 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $168,800 ii $168,800 00 a Page 21 Packet Pg. 48 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SR 99 — P6 & D15 Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SR 99 area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan Recommendation #1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. Estimated Cost: $926,100 + Parkland Acquisition • 2027 2028 Total Planning— Neighborhood Park SR99 (136) $82,000 $82,000 Construction — Neighborhood Park SR 99 (D15) $844,100 $844,100 Total Expenses $82,000 $844,100 $926,100 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $82,000 $82,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $82,000 $0 00 $82,000 00 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) ii U a- LL U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a 4- 0 c O c W a Go N 0 N • A N O N d LL U I d U N Y L a c N E t v R r r Q Page 22 Packet Pg. 49 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SE 2 — P7, D18 Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan recommendation #1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. Estimated Cost: $953,900 + Parkland Acquisition Planning— Neighborhood Park SE 2 (P7) $84,400 $84,400 Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (D18) $869,500 $869,500 Total Expenses $84,400 $869,500 $953,900 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $84,400 $84,500 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $84,400 $0 i 00 $84,500 00 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 00 N 0 N A N O N d LL U I IL U N Y L a c N E t v R r r Q Page 23 Packet Pg. 50 7.A.a Parks & Recreation 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor - P8 & D19 41h Avenue from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the Arts, Downtown Project Summary: Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary design development through 2020-21. Funding for this project has not been secured at this time. Project Justification: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and contribute to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District. Estimated Cost: $9,206,600 Planning & Design (138) 2023 2024 2025 2026 $2,251,000 2027 $2,251,000 Construction (D19) $6,955,600 $6,955,600 Total Expenses $2,251,000 $6,955,600 $9,206,600 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 Operating contribution — general fund Secured Grants Total Revenue $0 $0 $0 Project Accounting #C538 FL U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� m L Q_ Go N O N M N O N a u_ U i a U N Y L a c m E z U M r r Q Page 24 Packet Pg. 51 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2 600 3rd Avenue South, City Park Project Summary: The 40+ year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and needs major renovation or replacement and is too small to accommodate current staff and needed work areas. Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to more efficiently maintain City parks and capital facilities. The city's small equipment repair garage is used as the Park Maintenance locker room, daily meeting room, computer access (one for 11 FTEs) and work preparation space. It is insufficient for work efficiency and due to small size, inadequate for expansion of staffing with upcoming additional park and street landscape work requirements. Estimated Cost: $6,955,600 2023 0- Planning & Design (131) $1,125,500 $1,125,500 Construction (D2) $4,637,100 $4,637,100 Total Expenses $1,125,500 $4,637,100 $6,955,600 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fee's — Fund 332-100 Bond Proceeds Operating Contribution — General Fund Park Donations Total Revenue Unsecured Funding 00 00 .00 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) a U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a 4- 0 c 0 c� c W m L a Go N O N M N 0 N a u_ U i a U N Y L IL c m E z U M r r Q Page 25 Packet Pg. 52 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Seaview Park Restroom — R16 80th Ave W & 186th St SW Project Summary: ADA improvements to include renovation or replacement of the permanent restroom Project Justification: 2022 PROS Plan Recommendation #6 is to make improvements to existing parks as needed to ensure proper maintenance, usability and quality of park features and grounds to remove barriers and improve universal access. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. Estimated Cost: $417,900 Page 26 Packet Pg. 53 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Yost Pool Replacement — R15 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for many residents. In addition to teaching our youth water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity for community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. Funding for this project has not been identified and would likely require voter approval. Project Justification: While continuing to manage the existing infrastructure to keep Yost Pool open to the community, the 2022 PROS plan recommendation #4 is to replace Yost Pool. Estimated Cost: $23,881,000 Planning & Construction (R15) $23,881,000 $23,881,000 Total Expenses $23,881,000 $23,881,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fee's Secured Grants Bonds Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $0 $0 000000 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) a U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a 4- 0 c O c a� m a Go N 0 N M N O N a u_ U a U N Y a c m E t U r r Q Page 27 Packet Pg. 54 I 7.A.a I 2023-2028 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan PROGRAMS EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 28 Packet Pg. 55 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17 Project Summary: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) plan identified a significant list of deferred park maintenance projects. With the addition of a Parks Capital Project Manager, hired in 2022 and the Job Order Contracting program, the Parks Department will begin to make progress on the needed system -wide repairs, renovations and replacements of an aging parks infrastructure. Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs, increased city liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. The 2022 PROS Plan Recommendation #3.1 is to Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 (6-year total) Repair & Maintenance $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 Professional Services $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Total Expenses $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 Total Revenue $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 a U a u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L a. 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� m L Q. Go N O N M N O N d u_ U i a U N L IL c m E z U a r r Q Page 29 Packet Pg. 56 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Signage & Wayfinding — R10 • VIEW POINT PLAY STRUCTURE NATURAL AREA 81DOG WALK PARK OPEN DAWN TO DUSK Project Summary: Update signage system wide to include uniform and accurate trail identification information, orientation markers, safety and regulatory messaging, park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and warning signs. Project Justification: A comprehensive and consistent signage system is necessary to inform, orient and educate park users. The 2022 PROS plan recommendation #6.5 is to develop and provide consistent graphics and citywide signage to improve communication on access, usability and "branding" of the city's park and open space system. Estimated Cost: $51,500 Planning & Construction (R10) $51,500 $51,500 Total Expenses $51,500 $51,500 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $51,500 $51,500 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $51,500 $51,500 i a U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O IL 4- 0 C O a_. cC a-. C N N a ro N O N A N O N IL u_ U I d U N L IL c m E t r r Q Page 30 Packet Pg. 57 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Playground Replacement / Inclusive Upgrades — R13 Project Summary: City of Edmonds owns, operates and maintains 15 playgrounds and only two of them are considered fully inclusive and accessible (Seaview and Civic Park). One of the Parks, Recreation and Human Services Department initiatives is to continually update playgrounds which range in installation dates from 1985 - 2019. As part of these scheduled updates the department will work to enhance playgrounds to be inclusive versus merely meeting ADA standards. In many cases this includes enhanced play surfacing and play equipment that provide for users of all abilities. Elm Street Park, Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Park playgrounds have been identified as priority in the PROS Plan and will be addressed in the first three years of this capital improvement plan. Project Justification: Playground upgrades are a necessary part of maintaining a safe play environment. With playgrounds that are 35+ years old many are scheduled for upgrades. Further, it is the goal of the City to ensure that those upgrades include considerations for children of all physical and mental abilities and that these play amenities are designed to be a welcoming and healthy experience for all. Estimated Cost: $197,000 Construction (R13) $197,000 $202,900 $209,00 $608,900 Total Expenses $197,000 $202,900 $209,00 $608,900 Real Estate Excise Tax II — Fund 125 $197,000 $202,900 $209,00 $608,900 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $197,000 $202,900 $209,00 i $608,900 a c� a u_ 0 ao N O N M N O N N N O am O L a O c 0 :r M c a) 0) a) L a ao N O N CO) N O N a u_ 0 i a_ U L M a c d z a Page 31 Packet Pg. 58 UA K04 IN FAI Ll I I AKOIIJLIIIFO Ar Z. w II J F 1 j` F5j K 1 I j 1 � 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Parkland Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1, SR 99 & SE 2 - A2, A3 & A4 Project Summary: Acquisition of parkland when feasible that will benefit citizens and support the priorities identified in the PROS Plan. Currently, $900,000 is reserved for parkland and open space acquisition. These funds were accumulated in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. There is no request to purchase a specific property at this time as opportunities are somewhat limited in a mostly built -out city, but staff continues to search for, develop and negotiate opportunities. Project Justification: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan recommendation #1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. Estimated Cost: $5,230,500 Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2) 2023 0- $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3) $1,545,000 $1,545,000 Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4) $2,185,500 $2,185,500 Total Expenses $1,500,000 $1,545,000 $2,185,500 $5,230,500 Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $1,100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,500,000 Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD Total Revenue $1,100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,500,000 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) a U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N N O Q O L 11 4- 0 c O c a� a Go N O N . M N O N d u_ U I d U N L IL c N E M v R r r Q Page 33 Packet Pg. 60 7.A.a Parks & Recreation Interurban Trail Expansion — A5 .� r'7�=� () U_ Go o N g. M N O -_ N 0 0 24100 78th Place West a Project Summary: Acquisition of additional lands, easements and/or right-of-ways to continue the Interurban Trail, c including more off -road segments. M Project Justification: The 2022 PROS Plan Recommendation #5 is to improve trail connections including sidewalks N N and bike lanes to help link destinations across the community. Recommendation 5.1 suggests the City peruse LL opportunities to acquire additional lands, easements and/or right of way to continue the Interurban Trail. i a U N Y Estimated Cost: $895,585 L a Land Acquisition — Park Facilities (A5) $895,585 $895,585 Total Expenses $895,585 $895,585 Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition Total Revenue MMM Unsecured Funding m E M U a r r Q Page 34 Packet Pg. 61 2023-2028 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan FUND DETAIL 4EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES U d u- U Go N O N M N O N N N O Q O L. a 4- 0 c 0 c� c a� m L 00 N O N CM N O N d LL U I d U N Y L a c m E z u a r r Q Page 35 Packet Pg. 62 Fund 332 7.A.a Costs inflated at 3% per year Fund 332 Expenditures 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total D9 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation) $ 5,627,500 $ 5,627,500 D1 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Restoration) $ R14 Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration $ 56,300 $ 56,300 R3 Meadowdale Playfields (Renovations, City of Lynnwood ILA) $ D6 Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms $ 371,300 $ 371,300 D13 Neighborhood Park SE1 (Park Development) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 D15 Neighborhood Park SR99 (Park Development) $ 844,100 $ 844,100 D18 Neighborhood Park SE2 (Park Development) $ 869,500 $ 869,500 R15 Pool Replacement $23,881,000 $ 23,881,000 D14 Waterfront Walkway (Construction) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 P8 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor (Design Completion) $ 2,251,000 $ 2,251,000 D19 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor (Construction) $ 6,955,600 $ 6,955,600 P1 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design) $ 1,125,500 $ 1,125,500 D2 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Construction) $ 4,637,100 $ 4,637,100 Interfund Services $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 425,000 Debt Service Civic Park $1.6M (2021) $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 588,000 (C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures $ 494,300 $ 148,000 $ 7,464,500 $ 4,474,900 $12,660,200 $24,029,000 $49,270,900 Fund 332 Revenue 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total Park Impact Fee's (Fund 332 100) $ 848,350 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 3,098,350 Investment Interest (3%) $ 42,255 $ 54,144 $ 64,828 $ 74,243 $ 84,030 $ 94,111 $ 413,612 Miscellaneous Park Donations $ Bond Proceeds $ General Fund Transfer $ Unsecured Grants Marsh Estuary Restoration $ 5,624,500 $ 5,624,500 Unsecured Grants Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration $ 56,300 $ 56,300 Unsecured Grants Neighborhood Park SE 1 (Development) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 Unsecured Grants Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development) $ 844,100 $ 844,100 Unsecured Grants Neighborhood Park SE 2 (Development) $ 869,500 $ 869,500 Unsecured Grants Waterfront Walkway (Construction) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 Unsecured Grants 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor $ 2,251,000 $ 6,955,600 $ 9,206,600 Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc) Pool Replacement $ 23,881,000 $ 23,881,000 Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building $ 1,125,500 $ 4,637,100 $ 5,762,600 (D) TOTAL Fund 332 Revenue $ 890,605 $ 504,144 $ 7,778,328 $ 4,801,143 $12,996,230 $24,425,111 $51,395,562 a U a ILL U 0 N 0 N M N 0 N d N O O_ O a` 0 C O C O N d L a 0 N 0 N M N O N a LL U I a_ U N Y L to a C d E t U ca r Q Page 36 Packet Pg. 63 Fund 332 7.A.a Fund 332 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 (E) Beginning Fund Balance (332 + 332 100) $ 1,408,492 $ 1,804,797 $ 2,160,941 $ 2,474,769 $ 2,801,012 $ 3,137,042 (D) Revenue $ 890,605 $ 504,144 $ 7,778,328 $ 4,801,143 $12,996,230 $24,425,111 (C) Expenditures $ 494,300 $ 148,000 $ 7,464,500 $ 4,474,900 $12,660,200 $24,029,000 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 1,804,797 $ 2,160,941 1 $ 2,474,769 $ 2,801,012 $ 3,137,042 $ 3,533,154 Project Type: A Acquisition P Master Planning D Development New R Replacement / Upgrade Page 37 Packet Pg. 64 REET II Fund 125 7.A.a Costs inflated at 3% per year REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total P4 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan) $ 273,200 $ 273,200 D16 Elm Street Park (Nature Playground) $ 84,400 $ 84,400 D17 Elm Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 84,400 $ 84,400 R2 Johnson Property (Demo & Secure Site) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 P5 Johnson Property (Master Plan) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 R12 Maplewood Hill Park (Playground Replacement) $ 144,900 $ 144,900 D5 Mathay Ballinger Park (Paved Loop Pathway) $ 53,000 $ 53,000 D7 Mathay Ballinger Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 75,000 $ 75,000 P2 Neighborhood Park SE1 (Master Plan) $ 79,600 $ 79,600 P6 Neighborhood Park SR99 (Master Plan) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 P7 Neighborhood Park SE2 (Master Plan) $ 84,400 $ 84,400 R7 Olympic Beach Park (Restroom Upgrade) $ 53,000 $ 53,000 D10 Pine Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 79,600 $ 79,600 D11 Pine Street Park (Paved Connecting Pathway) $ 58,300 $ 58,300 D12 Pine Street Park (Canopy Shade Trees) $ 26,500 $ 26,500 R16 Seaview Park (Restroom Replacement) $ 417,900 $ 417,900 R8 Sierra Park (Playground Replacement) $ 185,700 $ 185,700 P3 Waterfront Walkway Design Completion $ 515,000 $ 515,000 R11 Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation $ 546,400 $ 546,400 R9 Yost Park (Tennis Court Resurface) $ 74,300 $ 74,300 R4 Yost Park (Trail, Bridge & Boardwalk Repairs) $ 80,000 $ 80,000 R6 Yost Park (Playground Replacement) $ 257,500 $ 257,500 R13 Playground Replacement / Inclusive Upgrades $ 197,000 $ 202,900 $ 209,000 $ 608,900 R10 Signage and Wayfinding $ 51,500 1 1 1 1 1 $ 51,500 R17 lCitywide Park improvements/ Capital Replacement Program $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,000 (C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures $ 1,035,500 $ 1,653,500 $ 1,578,500 $ 900,200 $ 1,070,800 $ 659,000 $ 6,897,500 REET II(Fund 125)Revenue 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II Fund 125 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 10,000,000 (D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $10,000,000 REET II (Fund 125) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 75,328 $ 1,039,828 $ 1,386,328 $ 1,307,828 $ 1,907,628 $ 2,336,828 (D) Revenue $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 (C) Expenditures $ 1,035,500 $ 1,653,500 $ 1,578,500 $ 900,200 $ 1,070,800 $ 659,000 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 1,039,828 $ 1,386,328 $ 1,307,828 $ 1,907,628 $ 2,336,828 $ 3,177,828 a V a u_ U Go N O N M N O N d N O O_ O a 4- 0 c O Id C O N d a` 00 N O N M N O N a u_ U I a_ U N Y R a c d E t U ca Q Page 38 Packet Pg. 65 REET I Fund 126 7.A.a Costs inflated at 3% per year REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total Al Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition) $ 8,741,800 $ 8,741,800 A5 Interurban Trail (Expansion/Acquisition) $ 895,585 $ 895,585 A2 Neighborhood Park SE1 (Acquisition) $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 A3 Neighborhood Park SR99 (Acquisition) $ 1,545,000 $ 1,545,000 A4 Neighborhood Park SE2 (Acquisition) $ 2,185,500 $ 2,185,500 (C) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures $ 1,500,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 10,927,300 $ $ $ 895,585 $14,867,885 REET I (Fund 126) Revenue 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I Fund 126 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000 (D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000 REET I (Fund 126) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 900,000 $ (400,000) $ (1,745,000) $(12,472,300) $(12,272,300) $(12,072,300) (D) Revenue $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 (C) Expenditures $ 1,500,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 10,927,300 $ $ (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) 1 $ (400,000) $ (1,745,000) $(12,472,300) $(12,272,300) $(12,072,300) $(11,872,300) U a LL U O N O N M N O N d N O O_ O L a O c O C O N d L a 00 N O N M N O N a LL U I a_ U N Y L M a c m E M U �a r a Page 39 Packet Pg. 66 TREE Fund 143 7.A.a Costs inflated at 3% per year TREE (Fund 143)Expenditures 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 1 6-Year Total Park and Open Space Acquisition Program Is (C) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ TREE (Fund 143)Revenue 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total Tree Fund 143 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 1,194,000 (D) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Revenue $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 1,194,000 TREE (Fund 143) 6-Year Overview 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 199,000 $ 398,000 $ 597,000 $ 796,000 $ 995,000 $ 1,194,000 (D) Revenue $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 (C) Expenditures $ $ $ $ $ $ (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 398,000 $ 597,000 1 $ 796,000 1 $ 995,000 1 $ 1,194,000 1 $ 1,393,000 U IL u_ U w N O N M N O N d N O O_ O L a O c O C O N d L a 00 N O N M N O N IL u_ U I a_ U N Y L a c m E U �a r a Page 40 Packet Pg. 67 CEMETERY Trust Fund 137 7.A.a Costs inflated at 3% per year CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Expenditures 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total D8 Columbarium Expansion Phase II $ 159,100 $ 159,100 Repair & Maintenance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 150,000 (C) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust(Fund 137) Expenditures $ 25,000 $ 184,100 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 309,100 CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total Cemetery Trust Fund 137 Investment Interest (@5%) $ 55,971 $ 58,270 $ 52,728 $ 54,864 $ 57,108 $ 59,463 $ 338,404 Cemetery Trust Fund 137 Sales Revenue $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 90,000 (D) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue $ 70,971 $ 73,270 $ 67,728 $ 69,864 $ 72,108 $ 74,463 $ 428,404 CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) 6-Year Overview 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,119,420 $ 1,165,391 $ 1,054,561 $ 1,097,289 $ 1,142,153 $ 1,189,261 (D) Revenue $ 70,971 $ 73,270 $ 67,728 $ 69,864 $ 72,108 $ 74,463 (C)Expenditures $ 25,000 $ 184,100 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 1,165,391 1 $ 1,054,561 $ 1,097,289 $ 1,142,153 $ 1,189,261 $ 1,238,724 a U IL u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O O_ O a` O C O to C O N d L a 00 N O N M N O N IL u_ U I a_ U N Y L a C m E U �a r a Page 41 Packet Pg. 68 7.A.a UP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023) PROJECTS ADDED Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Parks Johnson Property Demolition & Master Plan Demolition scheduled for 2023, master plan in 2025 Parks Meadowdale Playfields Renovations consistent with City of Lynnwood ILA Parks Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements Addition of paved loop pathway, permanent restrooms, shelter and picnic tables - 2023 Parks Yost Park & Pool Improvements Playground replacement (2023); Tennis court resurface, pool upgrades, trail/bridge repairs Parks Columbarium Expansion - Phase II Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - 2024 Parks Olympic Beach Park Improvements Renovation of existing restroom - 2024 Parks Pine Street Park Improvements jAddition of small shelter, picnic tables, shade trees and paved pathway - 2024 project Parks Neighborhood Park SE1 X Master plan and construction of new park in SE Edmonds Parks Maplewood Hill Park Playground replacement - 2025 Parks Elm Street Park Improvements Addition of nature playground, small shelter, picnic tables and habitat restoration - 2026 Parks Neighborhood Park SR99 Master Plan and construction of new park along SR99 Parks Neighborhood Park SE2 X Master Plan and construction of new park in SE Edmonds Parks Seaview Park Improvements I Replacement of permanent restroom and ADA upgrades - 2027 Parks Yost Pool Replacement X Replacement of existing pool - 2028 Parks Si na a and Wayfinding Standardization of park si na e - 2024 CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023) PROJECTS REMOVED Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Parks Civic Center Playfield X 2022 project Parks Marina Beach Park Improvements X Council declined grant and put project on hold Parks Yost Pool Repair (plaster) 2022 project - completed Parks Community Park & Athletic Complex - Phase II X Not identified as priority in 2022 PROS plan Parks Beautification Program Pro ram moved to Gift Catalog based on large donation CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023) Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Parks 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Moved back one year from 2025 to 2026 Parks Waterfront Walkway Completion Expense increase $84,500 due to inflation Parks Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration X Estimate for Master Plan added, acquisition and restoration expense still TBD Parks Orks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Buildir, X Cost estimate for design and construction added Parks I Parkland Acquisition I X lExpanded to include 3 neighborhood parks, marsh and Interurban trail a U a u_ U w N O N M N O N d N 0 0_ 0 a 0 c 0 a c a� N d L a 00 N O N M N O N a u_ U I a_ U N Y R a c m E t U �a r Q Page 42 Packet Pg. 69 M J ■� 1� � 1 1� � �' L , �5 J I ,t. t j'r V I 7Packet Pg. 70 7.A.b TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP.............................................................iii FACILITIES & WWTP P OJECT MAP............................................................................iv TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................1 PRESERVAT MAINT NCE PROJECTS............................................................4 SAFETY PACITY ANAL S....................................................................................12 NO TORIZED TRA ORT ON PROJECTS.........................................36 FERRYP CTS... .......... ...................................................................61 TRAFFICCALM ......... ........................................................................63 TRAFFIC PLANNING ....... ..............................................................65 GREENSTREETS.................................................................................................68 WATER........................................ ............................................................ 71 STORMWATER.................................. ... ................................................. 76 EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION ED PROJE ..................78 PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN PROJECTS ................. ............... ............ ..........80 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJE ........ ... ............... ..85 ANNUALLY FUNDED PROJECTS ........................... .................. ............... COMPLIANCE RELATED PROJECTS......................................................... .....9 SEWER......................................................................................................... ............ 94 FACILITIES............................................................................................. .................. 101 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.........................................................................1 26 CIP-CFP COMPARISON(2023-2028)....................................................................132 . • 7 T a- u_ U 00 N 0 N M N O N m 0 a 0 L a 4- 0 c 0 r r c m a� L a Packet Pg. 71 7.A.b U PWT-17 • 4PWT-07 • F PWT-65 7• PWT-04 PWT-51 0 WT-28 �-` P: T re WO 0- 1 qh,. PWT-24 • PWT-03 i PWT-09 PWT-12 Ci -35 4WT-16 1 RAW PWT-19 1 �WT-55 • PWT-11 PWT-25 PWT-15 rPWT-20 PWT-22 PWT-08 PWT-21 PWT-�29 P• PWT-47 PW�3O�j � WT2O PWT-13 PWT-14 I GG77� PWT-31 PWT-06 PWT-23 PWTi64 PWT-50 PWT-06 PWS-1� ' PWD-0: '� = 4p, W0 06PWT-26 P PWT-10 * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 racket Pg. 72 T a u- U CO N O N M N O N d N O Q. O L a. 4- 0 C O r r L 7.A.b 1 o PWF-13 ra, o �i r 0 0 ° M CO ° . Aldet . ' 11111l 1z f ' O W T 'U . ■ St Walnut ... It■if SEEM M 0 114111 I 41' igueSt Sprague Si 71pplw� ;WF-01 F-07 ,fir a I Edmonds St_ � ' ir M. PWF-16 � 0 Z f1�;��1M1 a;�i� _ Bell St L w n � �_°�.�iil■y■�L11 or Maple St _ s 1 c=R fir■■ doa Ider St PWF-09 01 04 PWF-03 • PWI PWF-10 I• ° ' 8Fuff,@,F-23;+ •u • .0 PIWF 1id 1,1 PWF-1 a LL U 00 N O N M N O N d u° O 0. O l O c r c� c m rn d IW It A AL AW .t j ' r 14Pr� r ' 7.A.b • • U d U- U 00 N O N II M -•g.; Nx: � � Packet Pg. 74 7.A.b #P v 2024' 2025 2026 2027 2028 AL TOTAL I(20203T 028) (2 29 43) I TOTALCostojec Preservation / Maintenance Proiects PWT-01 Annual Street Preservation Program $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $9,450,000 $24,750,000 $34,200,0( PWT-03 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,0( PWT-04 Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 9th Ave. $157,000 $780,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $937,500 $0 $937,5( PWT-05 Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $86,000 $480,000 $0 $566,000 $0 $566,0( PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $750,000 $0 $910,000 $0 $910,0( PWT-07 Main St. @ 3rd Si nal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,000 $371,000 $477,000 $0 $477,0( PWT-61 Olympic View Or Overlay - 196th / SR-524 to Talbot Rd AF $0 $0 $200,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,0( Safety / Capacity Analysis Ar it PWT-08 I X 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W Corridor $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,862,000 $6,360,000 $9,222,000 $0 $9,222,0( PWT-09 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 $2,646,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,646,000 $0 $2,646,0( PWT-10 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 3 $1,11fill $2.608,000 $1,500,000 $15,000,000 $11,752,000 $0 $32,040,000 $0 $32,040,0( PWT-11 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & GatewayProject - Stage 4 4 $2,100,000 $3,710,000 $2,262,000 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 $30,812,000 $0 $30,812,0( PWT-12 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 5 $ $0 $0 $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $0 $7,044,000 $37,971,000 $45101510( PWT-13 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,217,000 $20,217,0( PWT-14 X I Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,142,000 $38,142,0( PWT-15 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,242,000 $35,242,0( PWT-16 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 9 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,072,000 $20,072,0( PWT-17 X SR 524 196th St. SW / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $255,000 $230,000 $765,000 $1,250,000 $0 $1,250,0( PWT-18 X Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements $0It $0 $190,000 $1,060,000 $0 $1,250,000 $0 $1,250,0( PWT-19 X 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW - Intersection Improvements $761,250 $462,750 $6,673,000 $0 $0 $8,697,000 $0 $8,697,0( PWT-20 SR-104 Adaptive System - 236th to 226th $ $0 $1,984,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,227,440 $0 $2,227,41 PWT-21 X SR-104 @100th Ave W. Intersection Improvements $0 $ $0 $170,000 $987,000 $0 $1,157,000 $0 $1,157,0( PWT-22 X SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 85,000 $478,000 $0 $563,000 $0 $563,0( PWT-23 X SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements $0 $0 00 $1,219,000 $0 $1,433,000 $0 $1,433,0( PWT-24 X Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,266,000 $1,266,0( PWT-25 X 84th Ave. W 212th St. SW to 238th St. SW $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $16,622,000 $16,622,0( PWT-26 I X SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 low $ &I $) $0 $0 $0 $3,231,000 $3,231,0( PWT-27 X 1 Olympic View Dr. 174th St. SW Intersection Improvements $0 $0 off$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $671,000 $671,0( PWT-28 175th St SW Sloe Repair $0 $ $0 1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,0( PWT-63 2023 Guardrail Program $20,190 $0 $0 $0, $0 $20,190 $0 $20,1( PWT-59 2023 Traffic Signal and Safety Upgrades $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,280 $0 $30,2E Non -motorized transportation projects AF a 0 d ILL U 00 N O N M N O N d N O 0. O L. d 4- 0 C O r+ C d N G1 L d a LL V d c.i fn Y L O t,1 7 IL 00 N O N PWT-29 X 232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-104 $0 $0 $0 off$0 $276,000 $1,526,000 $1,802,000 $0 $1,802,0( N PWT-30 X 236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $286,000 $1,642,000 $0 $1,928,000 $0 $1,928,0( N PWT-31 PWT-32 X X 236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $680,000 $0 $0 $0 $840,000 $1,831,000 $0 $1,831,0( C $840,0( PWT-33 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,0( S PWT-34 I X 180th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. $0 $0 $0 $633,000 $2,374,000 $0 $3,007,0001 $0 $3,007,0( V PWT-35 X 218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $256,000 $1,431,000 $1,687,000 $0 $1,687,0( +�+ PWT-36 X Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave S $0 $0 $0 $281,000 $0 $0 $281,000 $0 $281,0( Q PWT-37 X 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W $0 $0 $0 $213,000 $0 $0 $213,000 $0 $213,0( PWT-39 X Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project $1,771,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,771,847 $0 $1,771,8& PWT-40 X Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $213,0001 $213,000 $2,438,000 $2,864,000 $0 $2,864,000 PWT-41 X 95th PI. W Walkwa from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $127,000 $710,000 $0 $837,000 PWT-42 I X Railroad St. Walkway from Dayton St. to Main St. / SR-104 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $800,000 I $0 $980,000 Packet Pg. 75 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 7.A.b PWT-43 X SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Trans Improvements $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $1,600,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 PWT-44 X Downtown Lighting Improvements $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $1,200,000 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,0( PWT-45 X SR-104 Walkway: HAWK to Pine / Pine from SR-104 to 9th $0 $0 $0 $265,000 $265,000 $2,650,000 $3,180,000 $0 $3,180,0( PWT-46 X 191st St. SW Walkway from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $678,000 $678,0( PWT-47 X 104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane Walkway from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $1,060,0( PWT-48 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $324,000 $324,0( PWT-49 PWT-50 X X 84th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW 238th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $328,000 $1,285,000 $328,0( $1,285,0( PWT-55 X Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S $901,974 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $901,974 $0 $901,9i PWT-60 2023 Pedestrian Safety Program link, $20,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,195 $0 $20,1E PWT-62 Citywide Lighting Study $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $01 $0 $60,0001 $0 $60,0( Ferry Projects Ad in I PWT-52 I (Traffic Calmino Program 1 1 - 1 M&l301 $18.0001 $18.0001 $18.0001 $18.0001 $18.00011 $123.13011 $01 $123.1: PWT-53 I ICitvwide ADA Transition Plan Green Streets PWT-64 Green Streets 236th St SW - 84th Ave W to Hi hwa 99 $204,717 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,704,717 $0 $3,704,71 PWT-65 Green Streets Dayton St - Highway 104 to 2nd Ave S-7 $78,027 $0 ,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,678,027 $0 $1,678,0: Total Projects $10,533,050 $1 0,974,750 $35,631,000 $45,422,000 $32,309,000 $146,281,300 $203,690,000 $349,971,3( Funding Source 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL (2023-2028) TOTAL (2029-43) TOTAL OEM - Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal revenue $670,000 $0 IMQOO $150,000 $150,000 $1,120,000 $2,250,000 $3,370,0( REET Fund 125 $1,217,277 $65 $600 $8 $500,000 $500,000 $4,273,277 $7,500,000 $11,773,2i REET Fund 126 $1,169,492 $5 0 $818,0 $518,000 $518,000 $4,159,492 $7,500,000 $11,659,4� Transportation Imact Fees $629,226 $1, 644 "8,89131011h, $1,056,000 $0 $0 $5,140,760 $0 $5,140,7( General Fund $0 $605,00099W$500,000 7%500,0001,000 $500,000 $2,605,000 $7,500,000 $10,105,0( Water Utility Fund 421 $17,500 $10,00 $5,000 $600,000 $665,000 $2,535,5001 $0 $2,535,5( Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $367,427 $10,000 $5,000 $ $0 $382,427 $0 $382,4: Sewer Utility Fund 423 $0 $0 $0 $12 $270,000 $149,000 $545,000 $0 $545,0( Federal Grants $1,173,199 $2,067,856 $2,143,860 $ 0 $0 $0 $7,290,915 $0 $7,290,91 State Grants $3,756,685 $2,608,000 $1,500,000 4,000 $6,742,000 $0 $28,880,685 $0 $28,880,6( Other Sound Transit Grant $1,249,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 01 1,249,500 $0 $1,249,5( ARPA $282,744 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $282,744 $0 $282,7z Unsecured Funding $0 $3,500,000 $3,584,000 $15,401,000 $35,504,000 $29,827,000 $87,816,000 $178,940,000 $266,756,0( Total Revenue $10,533,050 $11,411,500 $10,974,750 $35,631,000 $45,422,000 $32,309,000 $146,281,300 $203,690,000 $349,971,3( d LL U 00 N O N M N Packet-Pg. 76 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Project Description 14440opp� Annual pavement preservation progra Project Benefit Maintains the City's pavement infrastructu steets. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000 to $1,650,000/ year rger capital investment to rebuild City Design $50,000 $50,000 $5W00 $60,00 Right of Way Construction $1,450,000 $1,450,000 $1,450,000 $1,590,00 Expense Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,650 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal $500,000 $150, 00 REET Fund 125 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 REET Fund 126 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 Transportation Impact Fees a U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d to O IZ O L w- O c O r r c as as L a $900,00 pr,590,000 $1,590,000 $23,850,00 i $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $24,750,00 i $150,000 $150,000 $2,250,00 i $500,000 $500,000 $7,500,00 $500,000 $500,000 $7,500,00 General Fund $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $7,500,00 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $24,750,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 5 Packet Pg. 78 i BoI Il PI SlH' �Al PI SN! i 1861h St SW y Q s " ,ennalsv 187th St SW m Jill 187thP1 SN1 a' W 188th St SW ¢ a Q 2 N a, T 189th PI00 S SOP 00 a a'19oth St SW" 1 v, G PI 7 9151 P i v � 191st St SW 192nd St SW s� SOV, 192nd Pi SW 6 193rd PI SW na•.b s:a q �^ a 194th St a , ap 19S1h St 196th St SW — �_S— �196TH_ST-:S oQo`c � Project Description Pavement overlay of 76th Ave. W from and addition of a bike lane for then 0 OOU and Lynnwood, since the west half of the sti Project Benefit 11 y63r a . asC1 1� �.� - ,a Q - -��.y-� o 3 a y : 185tn-St=Sw � ,185th- -St_SW 185thPP.SW tiiPicy } °' ¢ t '� m r r y e6txstsw I a I� 86th-Sp W 187th-PI=SW: 1. > � --i �=168th=Pi:SW F_188TH-ST-SW � c ¢'==190tl C 04191s1 PtSW, Q 192nd-PI-SW—_----�, 2 Q v _ 193rd:Pf SW_ n n SW 19q�h Pl SW Penny Ln 4 h-P_i-Syl, 1e9thpls� 891ha O� I- d -st-sw�' ➢.190tn-st-sw , U C 'mil 92nd 1.91st-st-SW L date u- f; 19211dPark=Way W O =190r WSW--� '1g3rd St SW N M 194ttrst 3W. N N N L a � 0 0 FF 0 c to pic View Dr. with pedestrian curb ramp upgrades ° r to t. This is a joint project funded by the Cities of Edmonds c r is in the City of Es and the east half is in the City of u°', a Improve pavement condition and upgrade pedesiYRR curblill existing southbound bike lane, the project may add a new no Transportation Comprehensive Plan. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REST Fund 125 REST Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Other Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $15,000 $15,000 $3,315 $11, 685 $15,000 Fmeet ADA nd bike Ian ndards. In addition to the kutlined in the City's 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 6 Packet Pg. 79 Edmonds Police and Civic Playfield Municipal Court Veteran's z z z Plaza ¢ ¢ Bell St a W Bell St Q 00 F— aN MAIN ESiT a U Yo a Sno-Isle Frances Anderson Pa LL U Lib r Anderson Center N 00 ' ion Center Field y W CN Q - - Q N M - Dayton St Q, N - — - =� ; N Christian ¢' N Science 0% Map, 0 Church 0 L Project Description Pavement overlay along Main St. froIltCv Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) at t Istin federal grant (funds available in 2023) and Cit Jthwith 0 c pedestrian curb ramps upgrades and Rectangular ° rosswalk at 8th Ave. The project will be funded with a nds fora local match. u, a) L Expense Total $157,000 $780,500 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 $31,400 $156,000 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $125,600 $624,500 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $157,000 $780,500 Packet Pg. 80 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 7 z )ri��ood C a h rn Puget <� Puget Way Z W f _ AL Ia =I � Pu ON Project Descripti cr QQ' Sr Q�G PUGET [ Edmonds Elementary a' u Excelsior PI n E 7, O The project consists of a complete sign h t moval of all vehicle head currently on Spam wire and conversion to standard traffic signal a s. Vehicle detention will also be upgraded as part of this project. Project Benefit This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditiolMR11—ce thA wires. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that all vehic Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total while handing on those $480,000 $86,000 $480,000 $86,000 $480,000 $86,000 $480,000 a U d u_ tU 0 N z N d N 0 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 8 Packet Pg. 81 N O Faith Community Church a O 238th St SW Project Descriptio Install new traffic signal and vehicle de n Project Benefit The existing traffic signal is near the end of it nticipated s Estimated Project Cost $910,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total rn SW 238th St SW $160,002W$750,000 $160,000 $750,000 $160,000 $750,000 a n i 237th PI a U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N 0 SW o L 0 c 0 r 0 r c as a� L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 9 Packet Pg. 82 B racketts Landing �a South - Railroad Station Post am Office IT a Cc es & Mini Parke St��' Q 4, a Project Descriptioi Install new traffic signal and vehicle del _�qw 0, Project Benefit The existing traffic signal is near the end of Estimated Project Cost $477,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Edmonds Polic Est and Municipal p Court Veteran' i Edmonds Centennial Plaz V City Mall Plaza Bell LL 00 N N N O N N Fountain MAIN ST n 0 a 0 L a 0 $106,000 $371,000 $106,000 $371,000 _ 0 c� d N L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 83 10 Project Descripti Pavement overlay along Olympic View upgrades. 4 Project Benefit Improve pavement condition and improve a Estimated Project Cost Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total / SR-524 to Talbot Road, along with ADA curb ramp $100,000 $300,000 $100,000 $300,000 $700,000 $200,000 $1,300,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 84 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 85 12 Sti 5i \�O �O a a Y 232nd St SW Project Descripti J L ti r.dr ram_-- t. ESPERANCE L � .7. 224th Si SW , 22btr �i_�ry - r! ar■ *■- �w•■'r.b+ r�J w� M 224ih 5t=5W- 3 zxa,h P1 SW r' f wr�1 i 7 w i I J,i Il�dl ■ *r a m qi,7 16 LJ r+ l i °' l w • 224th PI Syy f a n 1 �> Q @.li II■ f��l, ■ 0K.; t7 't�i zzstT�sw am^wsw ■ 7 If +'��-...3, M am i n ■. . r,'; 1,°ILr •� a V° l■ 'f 225cn PfSW www www.- Isla +� tea' ,�� _� N f 226th St SW3 226th St 5W-a l �! 11 ldt. M.�*w�ro '. of "o Ltr i "pl '_.,�♦ rJ tf M. yrpjl swy �L � 111► +?a w ..a.r l ■' N r = : ' 3 All s '+�,_7. � c,■� 11M + ■ •. is -� � ■I # w a Qi- m �► _Eco `�°+t+A a :.f fit s� Y, •�+'� a co Mw L <' i■■iFii � � J w ■� d 228TH Si SV V dr ti rr IMF ■ drl 22C St g i, A s IV LU :ffi _ 7 .% 4_a r m 2301th St SW -r— . oa "Ro= a: Q Cq ! i 0_® mt s�-i■ts� t ' .230th St SW,�,- M t� • Vir N N d ORE mid A -- O Q. O c Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to� hre es (with center two-way left turn lane), with curb and ° gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. m to Project Benefit lW This project would improve active transportat n sa affic s along this corridor. Community Transit a will evaluate the possibility of creating a new eas st bu to ng 228th St. SW, if this project moves v forward (connecting Edmonds Transit Station to Mountlake Te Transit St4 a Estimated Project Cost $9,222,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,000,000 862,000 Y$1, 000,000 $6,360,000 $1,000,000 $1,862,000 $6,360,000 $1,000,000 $1,862,000 $6,360,000 $1,000,000 $1,862,000 $6,360,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 13 Packet Pg. 86 m 7 212TH-Sr'T SW -:Y— > FLLPn x ' 610 w 220THSTSW. �] a w a r r Q[�r L o 228TH ST SW O H I� In LLI zsI6T I� .srLIJ - / 244TH Project Descriptio Installation of raised landscaped mediarec rthe corridor from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW, addition of "Gateway" signage on both ends ew pedestrian HAWK signal just north of 234th St. SW The project is funded from state funds provinecting Washington Transportation program, as well as REET funds. Project Benefit The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a lands raised me ill improve corridor safety along this Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an Aver Daily Tr A 35,000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK signal will provide a signalized pedestrian ossing en the ing traffic signals at 238th St and 228th St. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction $2,646,000 Expense Total $2,646,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $81,000 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants $2,565,000 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $2,646,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 14 d U ii LL U 00 N O N M N O N N d 0 Q. 0 L 0 Packet Pg. 87 c 0 c m rn W a 2381h Si SW 2401h Si SW CLCL 242nd St SW ro , 238TH ST SW 238th St SW m 3 w (t'ek 240th St SWCOy6, 79th b'�qw 55 O"r"" 0nf31 d*" it W ``'T a' Z n S 240th P! SW 241 st St SN d V a LL 242nd St SW - - pp a a 242nd PI S4V N m 04 -.. r 243rd PI S C; 0 N C*4 4Y WAY LAKE BALLINGEA a 0 a Project DescriptionOIV o c The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits a o h S to 238th St. SW. The project will add a planter strip c� on both sides of the street, new stre htin m stormwater facilities, targeted utility replacements, _ potential undergrounding of overhead utiliti landscaping and other softscape treatments. The Design and right of way phases are funded through secured C nectI g Washing ds. a Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this s Estimated Project Cost $32,970,000 the HwvAllkrridor. Design $945,000 $1,425,000 $500,000 Right of Way $235,000 $1,183,000 $1,000,000 Construction $15,00 0 $11,752,000 Expense Total $1,180,000 $2,608,000 $1,500,000 $15,000,000 $11,752,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Water Utility Fund 421 $600,000 $638,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Sewer Utility Fund 423 $126,000 $130,000 Federal Grants State Grants $1,180,000 $2,608,000 $1,500,000 $14,274,000 $6,742,000 Unsecured Funding $4,242,000 Funding Source Total $1,180,000 $2,608,000 $1,500,000 $15,000,000 $11,752,000 Packet Pg. 88 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 15 Project Descriptio The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits a orare to approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW. The project will add a planter strip on bo des targeted utility replacements, potential uncle treatments. The intersection of Highway 99 of service. The Design and right of way phas federal grant and local traffic impact fees. Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In additionYfe con Estimated Project Cost $30,812,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees Water Utility Fund 421 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Sewer Utility Fund 423 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 224th 20THSTa S' r,q J 71 224th St SW' � II Ln �w z~ Ow a Y ❑ J w ~ ,new street lighting, improved stormwater facilities, g of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape St. will b ed to add capacity and improve the level ured Connecting Washington funds, a develop nt would be improved. $740,000 $1,600,000 $710,000 $161W0 $500,000 $3,000,000 $2,100,000 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 $740,000 $2,100,000 $3,710,000 $2,262,000 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 $376,000 $1,044,540 $1,752,009 $1,056,000 $600,000 $665,000 $140,000 $149,000 $364,000 $1,055,460 $1,957,991 $1,206,000 $10,260,000 $10,186,000 $740,000 $2,100,000 $3,710,000 $2,262,000 $11,000,000 $11,00 Packet Pg. 89 16 a U iL LL U 00 N O N M N O N d to 0 Q. 0 a 0 c 0 r 0 c m U) W a 213th pl SW 215th St SW h 216th Project Description � Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 21 new street lighting, better stormwat4 overhead utilities, landscaping and of Project Benefit a Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 212TH ST 8W' Aft LLI a a z S w �- � a' 214fhJsr SW �IC G��P U r� r �� p, `001�00 N / V M / N N N to _ 21 bth St SW 216th S 0 / — C F d 0 c pr t will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, Ie eted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of r pe treatmentst� identify the area as being in Edmonds. W a lopment will be improved $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $2,080,000 $4,964,000 $1, 000,00 $1, 000,00 $35,971,00 $37,971,00 $37,971,00 $37,971,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 17 Packet Pg. 90 Madrona Ln 3 235th P1 SW s 236th Si SW x Q m 341h 236th St SW Project Description Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. S7and 23 new street lighting, better stot ana overhead utilities, landscapingother soft Project Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $20,217,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 234th St SW a' 236th St SW 4 n a a' w v e p ct will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, Ie eted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of pe treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. lopment would be improved d 00 N O N M N O N N d N Q 0 d 0 $2,146,00 cc $1,433,00 C $16,638,00 cc $20,217,00 y $20,217,00 $20,217,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 18 Packet Pg. 91 F �1� POF -■01■ 41 V i . ■71 I�y� ��t�rn�■A Holly Ln . T 228 Tti ST SW m - - 14MaoJ■ it �! p, ii - . 229th St —SW'- i_ i 140 iyer i �1161r 1 � 22kh PISW i .t��Ml� ■ � al s � i e= r j 230th St SW 230th St SW ' rig:,•, 1 Cq v / N 4V 16jo;-n F. plop r 1k 13ro 3 SW •� dj } Project Description 2341h St SW Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 2; new street lighting, better stormwatq overhead utilities, landscaping and of Project Benefit ana Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 234th Si SW 3 w a n 232nd St SIN I 229th St SVV / 4 v ,230th S1 SW �W w 23D� Sr} W Q s 4r Q b � O r e p ct will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, Ie eted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of pe treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. lopment would be improved os La W Y a J N A $4,013,00 $5,354,00 $28,775,00 $38,142,00 $38,142,00 $38,142,00 ♦L U a tL U O N O N M N O N d to O M O L 4- 0 c O M c m a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 19 Packet Pg. 92 -0 dF gr oil 16611 -22atn�5t yw �� • ■ I& n i n r F. 225tha Pl SW o 225th PI SW. 3M 226th St SWN -r. ago 8fsi 1 - 1• IL U a. � 228TH ST w Project Description ' 224th St 3W L = — —224thr St SW — — —� zzscn s sr. _2 C N a n a -- EDMONDS !„ ° �AOUNTLAKE a v U. W 0 226TH PL SW_ --— Ci N r N N 4 N O N b n� rn 0 0 M 0 a 4- 0 c Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 22re e p ct will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwat ana eted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of = overhead utilities, landscaping and other sofreatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. w Project Benefit , Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost $35,242,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total lopment would be improved $3,596,00 i $2,439,00 i $29,207,00 $35,242,00 $35,242,00 $35,242,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 20 Packet Pg. 93 216th St SW & 216th St SW F St SW d 220TH-ST SW --- -- . n� Project Descriptio Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500 n 22 t. SW to 216th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, ne et li in , er stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of o head utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Project Benefit 4004 Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, along the corridor. a Estimated Project Cost $20,072,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total ao N O N M N O N N a) 0 CL 0 a 4- 0 ment would be improved $1,866,00 i $2,036,00 $16,170, 00 . $20,072,00 $20,072,00 $20,072,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 21 Packet Pg. 94 196th St 5W rwlow PUD �Q ub 4n Maplewood Ir Hill Park W n Q 00 00 v Seventh Day Q Adventist Church co 196TH ST SW Project Descriptio Install traffic signal at the intersection W th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting north d an)ou d traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address theiciency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant i07 study enmencled by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or asnterimffic signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This proj a Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $255,000 $230,000 $765,000 $255,000 $230,000 $765,000 $255,000 $230,000 $255,000 $230,000 a U a - ILL U 00 N O N M N N� N m 0 s M 0 a 0 c 0 r 0 c m a� a $765,000 $765 non Packet Pg. 95 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 22 Anderson Center Field Bell St z a s 00 v Q co Bell MAIN STLL _ a — a 00 � V W o > Yost Park N a M N O N N Olt Dayton St 0 O CL O L Project Description Installation of a traffic signal or mini-ro b 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit Uff The existing intersection is stop -controlled fo II a (below the City's concurrency standards: LOS D)A delay to LOS B. Estimaooject Cost $1,250,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total IL 4- 0 c ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the c� m N O L a (projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F traffic signal would improve the intersection $1,060,000 $190,000 $1,060,000 $190,000 $1,060,000 $190,000 $1,060,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 23 Packet Pg. 96 WINCO 219th St SW LO N_ }� T IW 00 Q a r~` 21919 STARBUCKS 220TH ST SWUJ a a .. o� 7514 Q N M d ■ o ER 221st PI SW LYNWOOD a 0 L IL Project Description o c Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left t n thr / right turn lane. Add eastbound and westbound ° r dedicated left turn lanes with a prot d-per tt se. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement r during southbound left turn phase. (Addition mprovements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, and various utilityimprovements (including potential co rsion over es to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT aL � p (� gpa PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan Project Benefit Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The proj( LOS D. Improve active transportation conditions for pedestria Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Water Utility Fund 421 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 $606,250 $155,000 $300,000 $500,000 $64,750 $398,000 $6,673,000 $761,250 $800,000 $462,750 $6,673,000 $253,226 $392,104 $266,881 $17,500 $10,000 $5,000 $17,500 $10,000 $5,000 $473,024 $387,896 $185,869 $6,673,000 $761,250 $800,000 $462,750 $6,673,000 24 improved from LOS F to Packet Pg. 97 Aigong, a 5tt 226th St SW 4St SSW 228th St SW a m s 231st St SyG C N Om � O 9 7772 c� chusett=Rd' "' _;O a Nottinghafr Rd' ❑ °o Z 235th PI SW C0C _ ❑ v W Project Description Installation of an Adaptive System alon -1 2 St. SW to 226th St. SW (total of five traffic signals along this stretch / spaced —1, mile f eac h signal communication currently exists between any o the existing traffic signals. (SR-104 @ 236th S W, SR-104 @ 232nd St. SW, SR-104 @ 95th PI. W, SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W, and SR-104 @ 226th St. SW) Project Benefit 49004 a 2 � 1- C, T C% II .z�elis z ne Pu,; a LLJ O .o a II � n PI5P: n 4 m Q�5 z231s a 232nd St SW 7 a m � .3: }�LL, 2fI -223th P1SVV i a ■; 1 u4_226th St SW - :=.1 L'�.1L�� `n :.,!.■ }. ,e. � ,:r soe AY --`� ,e irMw.a .� �t♦ e�: 228TH ST SW g # P-11 r■ A.A. •■ 'rroA .,14. 1� 229th:StS`o.. r �ai« �,Ay . F■ �3a...■� ■m■■ ■ 4,230th-St- i ai Y i d 231'st St SW 00 ... •. 7.s a � _ f 1■iaHT.ri�d '� �,L D ��■■iu ul 41. _!7 �Tl i.. �♦ 232nd PISW.1 K7 fr1, a V �r L 44ol,ly, ._ .. a 00 =�R Maple Ln ��■� O IN 2341h St SW a �= Madrona Ln N > N O N -a 4dsl�L —236th St SW 1f: 236th St SW 236th it N Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a curre per day. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,984,000 $243,440 $1,984,000 $32,865 $210,575 $243,440 $1,984,000 $1,984,000 DT) of — 25,000 vehicles O Q c O r f c m to W a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 25 Packet Pg. 98 Project Descriptioi Implement Westgate Circulation Acces safety to access the driveways withi xim potential addition of bike lanes. This project (completed in 2015). PCC NATURAL MARKET 0 Z Y K a W > BANK a 'S O Ir— WALGREEN'S PARKING 76 GA: BANK EDMONDS WAY 4AW Ave. IL c0 O OG W N O d' N O Vi V O O O CMT M M N O co0000co cor`r- r<r- to N nn N CD IVAR'S D N N O N N d N ` O M O � a 0 c mi ck pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve ersection, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the = M identified in the Completed Streets Corridor Analysis L IL Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve act nsporta EstimlMoject Cost V $1,157,000 Design $170,000 Right of Way Construction $987,000 Expense Total $170,000 $987,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $170,000 $987,000 Funding Source Total $170,000 $987,000 Packet Pg. 99 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 26 i 27th St < M � 228th St , tiw - 228TH ST SW � S Project Descriptio Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add rl Complete Streets Corridor Analysis ( pletc Project Benefit I Improve intersection safety for pedestrians a Estimated Project Cost $563,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Westgate Chapel nagement. This project was identified in the SR-104 $85 5478,000 $478,000 $85,000 $478,000 $85,000 $478,000 W ov a Z V OLL W tU rU V) N ww o N M N O N N d N O O L 4- 0 c O r c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 27 Packet Pg. 100 a o rn 238th st sw 238TH ST SW�,, o,� o� CO � Q � y q Project Description � Install traffic signal. This project was 2015). Project Benefit V Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,433,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total a U a- u_ U 00 N 0 N M N N O N Korean Presbyter o Church 0. 0 0 L 0 c Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in ° r $214,000 $1,219,000 $214,000 $1,219,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 28 Packet Pg. 101 3 184th St SVv i Seaview Park Post Office 184th PI SW 2 �. N/UwOO IL w 0 �60 a - - _ OLYMPIC UfEwDR \ N M N N O N Lynndale Park ? Rhth St G1Ad. C CL O L Project Descriptioi Install traffic signal (the intersection cu 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). A Project Benefit The improvement will reduce the intersection ela below the City's concurrency standards (LOS D). roje Estimated Project Cost $1,266,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REST Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total a 0 _ for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in m N L a ed el of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is i ove the Level of Service to LOS B. $213,00 $1,053,00 $1,266,00 $1,266,00 $1,266,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 29 Packet Pg. 102 y sLU Q j gpwDOIQ� a 220TWST=SN On g a 3 C3228TH ST Sti_ �000 �a�l °�a1P Project Descriptio Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with cu ut e I project was ranked #6 in the Long W ay li f Project Benefit Improve traffic flow, access and active transp rtatio bike lanes and street lighting. Estimated Project Cost $16,622,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total IPL IL LL o N ff �M N O n�ry N ST 0N O O. O IL 4- 0 F, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this 5 Transportation Plan). nstajffg a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks, $2,122,00 c c c c $14,500,00 c c $16,622,00 le $16,622,00 $16,622,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 103 30 � s Seattle *� Baptist CO Q r- n Church 40 .F °s �o- N 205TH ST N 20� Project Descripti Add a second westbound left turn lane Corridor Analysis (completed in 20! 14 Project Benefit Improve access, safety and delay at the intersIcti Estimated Project Cost $3,231,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total j LU ?nor.{ r'I SW f=- iTH ST a U ect was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street $481,00 $2,750,00 $3,231,00 $3,231,00 $3,231,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 31 Packet Pg. 104 '��., WDALE BEq_C 174th St SW 69 Project Descripti % -NO 3rd St SW a° rd PI sw 174th St SW St. Thomas Moore School Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a noror d rn for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration Ie o tturns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. (ROADWAY PROJE PRIORITY in 2015 Tran�portation Plan: #13) Project Benefit Improve intersection efficiency and safety of Estimated Project Cost $671,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total street. A $109, 00 $562,00 $671,00 $671,00 $671,00 a U d u_ U 0 N O N M N 0 N d N O M O L IL 4- 0 c 0 c m a� L 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 32 Packet Pg. 105 0 Snohomish -ouuALPark Project Descriptioi The project will stabilize the roadwa, St. SW. Project Benefit I Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankm Estimated Project Cost $1,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total T I 175th St SW ment and rebuild the damaged pavement on 175th $1,000,000 $1,000,000 = U H LL �C L) r00 N O N M N O N N d 0 Q. 0 L 4- 0 c 0 r 0 c m a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 33 Packet Pg. 106 Project Descriptio Upgrade traffic signal equipment at new vehicular detection, new vehic Project Benefit Improve reliability of traffic signal operation. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $30,280 $30,280 Frsections with new equipment within signal cabinet, edestrian heads. a v a U. 0 00 N O N M N O N d to O O. O L a 4- 0 c 0 m N O L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 34 Packet Pg. 107 Project Description Install guardrails along selected st Project Benefit Improve safety of City transportation syste Estimated Project Cost Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $ 20,190 $20,190 ty with steep drop-offs and other safety issues ii v a u_ 0 00 N O N M N O N d N O O. O L a 4- 0 _ 0 d N O L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 35 Packet Pg. 108 Packet Pg. 109 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 EDMONDS WAY 231 st St S W a zst 5t Pr E a, rn 9� 2327St V., a � L 65 7 7 a 233rd St SW � N m Q' L A 4 � L 234th Si SW Project Descripti Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW of 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $1,802,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total -104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List $276,000 $1,526,000 $276,000 $1,526,000 d U d tL U 00 N O N M N O N d to O M O d 4- 0 c 0 r c m rn a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 37 Packet Pg. 110 234th St S W r 7 rn Project Descriptio Install sidewalk with curb and gutter al ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of th 5 T Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $1,928,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total �H. 35th St SW d s LO rn s� Sth PI SW Woodway lementary FL U rn d u_ tU 00 N O N M N O N N Madrona 236th St 5VA o School 0. o d 0 c m Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ° r Plan. c m U) 642,000 $286 $1,642,000 $286,000 $1,642,000 $286,000 $1,642,000 0 a 2023-2028 CIP—CFP v0.3 38 Packet Pg. 111 W a Q CO H n St SVtiI a. 236tb a. 0 rs _ a. U L ,r v N O CO Q N f` N M CO N N N n d O O L Project Descriptio 0 Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW fro y 6t e. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of c ° r the 2015 Transportation Plan. r Project Benefit m a -agaw This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $1,831,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,831,00 $1,831,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 39 Packet Pg. 112 ZriisIIco t' e�� 01=r 0 0 a, �2 dN Bi-10 OLYMPIC m EDMONDS WATER r 00 CRE ST U 4 8901 m Madrona LIT sY `� 2361h St SW TH ST SW Project Description Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2 ran, Project Benefit I This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $840,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total _ 234th-St SW - _ 234th St SW I! PARK EDMONOS WHIRLr Am PTS BALL Christ W "LL Lutheran m ° NORTH m HAVEN z v MANOR t CHRIST LUTHERAN Church C5 o, CHURCH aRi°E TRAILER ¢ Park and Ride 236th OFFICE �� St SW COURT S i1 236th St SN! 23601 23603 SAFEWAY @ ; 23606 L KJIHG F F U 23607 M N SUNSET 23619 O 00 P WILLOW N Q BROOK L- R AURORA - 2O00 12 N 7 S MARKETPLACE M T _ 04 `- $L N = U FAMILY PANCAKE 09 N N V � 238th St SW 0 Q. SEO UL 0 4th St. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked n. $160,000 $680,000 $160,000 $680,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP vO.3 40 Packet Pg. 113 L W a 207th st S MA 2G_lh St=S 3 iv Q a c N 20att,-s'stiv _ lb 208th Pl SW m 7 a N i a � w o Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W fro th #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 spor i Project Benefit The improvements will improve active transp rtz schools). Estimated Project Cost $3,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 1 th Pf S Pl a' 85 h CL n EDM.DNDS 2osTH sT sw ui d a v _: a 0 210th Si SW N > � a N � N I � N � N I � O Q 0 d 0 c th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked ° r 0 c m to cluc& for school kids due to proximity of several $250,000 $2,500,000 $25 00 $250,000 $2,500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $2,500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $2,500,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 114 41 } OLYO o PI SW a a � v kJ y 84th St SW Q °0 184th St SW z CO a cone a I185th PI SW - m g SW _7871h PI III� a 187th S � co rh It SW 1881h St SW, � x Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th A, ... ,. 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $3,007,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total I r - amh 51-s- i `180th St SW w aoth si 181st Pl SW Q� 82rd pl . 782nd IT SW Q �p ,e'tridPismr ip e Way a _E00 Q \�ONO4 � 6' 'csn asvd cm N LYNkW00D W ` o CM -F.a m m � a o N 7th PI SW 'a -187th`PI A O 188th-P1_Syy M O d 4- 0 c This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the ° r $633,000 $2,374,000 $633,000 $2,374,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 42 Packet Pg. 115 218th St Chase Lake Elementary 216th St SW3: a a a' N L Chase Lake School CO T TQ W N CL CL q a eEdmonds 219th St SW CO ESPERANCEof Go�"� Project Description Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW fro ?rtat in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Tra Project Benefit I The improvements will improve pedestrian sz Estimated Project Cost $1,687,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Edmonds Woodway High School Swedis a Y 3: Edmonc W a 27 $th St a V a H: a u. V n n N 219th St S' O M � N O 3: N N d 0 CO SW__ r- r o a 4- 0 c Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 m N L a $1,431,000 $256,000 $1,431,000 $256,000 $1,431,000 $256,000 $1,431,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 116 43 BECK'S GREGORY THE MARINER 0) W COMMODORE C7 aU �y > a W O s� xx Walnut Sf Project Descriptio Install sidewalk on the south side of W Project Benefit This project will improve pedestrian safety a Estimated Project Cost $281,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Alder St cn -- a� n Q w n 7 a t this st S to 7th Ave. S. $236,000 $281,001 $281,000 $281,000 Cedar St 00 N O N M N O N N am U) 0 L 4- 0 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 44 Packet Pg. 117 Q MCDONALD'S ANT 3 w > '2 STEVENS T k n COURT AEGIS VALUE O Swedish VILLAGEO= Edmonds 216th St SW EDMONDS MEDICAL 21605 PAVILION R R �T CLI `C?� EN'S TH ER Project Descriptio Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 2 t. north side of 216th St. SW). This proj ank Project Benefit To provide a safe and desirable walking route. Estimated Project Cost $213,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 216th St SW Fy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on hort Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). $25 $213,000 $213,000 a U d LL U ao N 0 N M N O N N as 0 Q. 0 a 4- 0 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 45 Packet Pg. 118 IL v IL LL 0 00 N O N M N N d to O M O L Nubia, IL Project Description o c Installation of bike lanes or sharrows al a tre gments as identified on the Proposed Bike Facilities ma of 2015 Transportation Plan. Bi nes sh will be added along 100th St. SW / 9th Ave. from 244th c° p p g c St. SW to Walnut St, Bowdoin Way from 9th to 84th Av., 228th St. SW from 80th Ave. to 78th Ave., and 80th Ave. from 228th St. SW to 220th St. SW. RRF will be added a crossings along the Bowdoin and 9th Ave. a` / 100th St. SW corridors. .. Design $12,652 Right of Way Construction $1,759,195 Expense Total $1,771,847 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 $522,347 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Other (Sound Transit Grant) $1,249,500 Funding Source Total $1,771,847 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 46 Packet Pg. 119 'h a S nds S Mountain Ln z I � t Z Carol Way W a Z Glen St H 6+ Daley St� Daley Sty I a SWague �i Sprague St Edmonds St Vista PI Sierra PI W a Glen St U Q\ D ales J O i I PI N Edmonds stI F ds Bell St B 11 Z N 0 sr,n s - 200th-St-SW ' — —y a a a' 3� a 201 st FI SW > y 3 202nd Si SW, a v a w 202rd PI SW <' t � CO St SW w cc 203rd s 1 29�,-�04th St SW _ a 0 a V 205th PI SW a ° 00 r w ` N wh206th 51-5W- a N a � �� M 207th PI SW Q ¢ N N 207th St alloi N �I d o 208th PI sw Q- Y ` \ P d Project Descriptio o c Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. f ra th St. SW (^ 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th , aplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long = Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan � a Project Benefit Create pedestrian connection between Maplewo eme encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to wal Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $213,000 SW and Main St., by $2,438,000 $213,000 $2,438,000 $213,000 $213,000 $2,438,000 $213,000 $213,000 $2,438,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 47 Packet Pg. 120 I ' i � al F.; a 01 01 II � Project Description Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Tr4 Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety' Estimated Project Cost $837,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total LU EL 0 �' 1 ■ zz01 s ■ O W I � �, w w z2i wt 9 1l1'�1� 221 s[ PI �' a r ' u_ CO 1 !� If �• rti € o W N + N 2241h St SW d O L O c St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in ° r c m rn a $127 $127r710,000 710,000 $127,000 $710,000 $127,000 $710,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 48 Packet Pg. 121 Washington State Ferry Bracketts Terminal Landing South _ram a Post Office ��N S T Puget Sound Fishing Pier SMini Park -� i� d V LL Olym is V Railroad Q` a ✓ 00 Bea k cm Station W `�'� awes St 4 N Restroo �jj > M z ¢ N N N Nlo City of Edmonds —_ M _ 0 Treatment Plant Dayton St Dayton 5t 0 Project Description Install new and wider sidewalk alongrC�ente Project Benefit Improve active transportation safety along R various destination points (such as Waterfro Terminal...). Estimated Project Cost $980,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total on St. to SR-104. IL 4- 0 _ 0 d N L �. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to a s, Downtown Edmonds, WSDOT Ferry a $180,000 $18 F$800,000 OO $800,000 $180,000 $800,000 $180,000 $800,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 49 Packet Pg. 122 � : Seattle 243 rd PI SW s Baptist W Lake �QkO COn Church 'Q Ballinger �q 7 n N 205TH ST �Z�. 4 �� w N 204TH P Doi 1�4� Q Z K. N P4 w cWc I � � y G a } Yw ST Project Descripti Extend bike lanes within proximity of t corners and new ADA curb ramps. 4 Project Benefit Improve active transportation safety along th Estimated Project Cost $2,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total N 205TH ST hbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all terMan Trail and across SR-104. $ $1,600,000 $200je$200,000 $1,600,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,600,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,600,000 a U d U_ W U 'Z G W CV �M Q N 0 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 50 Packet Pg. 123 Project Description Installation of street lights along vari Project Benefit This project will add new street lighting in D Estimated Project Cost $75,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total town Edmonds. an safety at night. $300,000 $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 a v a a_ 0 ao N O N M N O N d 0 O M O L (L 4- 0 c 0 M a) N O L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 51 Packet Pg. 124 Edmonds Holly Dr TW+r_,` Cedar St Marsh r I^ �f 4 Howell Way Ma ndia z G N 0 ii Homeland 9s Spruce St Z 0 r =7 r Spruce Fri Q ` Hemlock Way-5 z �= t 10 Hemlock St � Laurel Waf > Erben Dr v j m Q iQ Seamont Ln L Laurel St w s7 a T > < i'INt S 1 v; Pine 5t Pine St CO to Q; Q Forsyth Ln ° a' Q w % a' Z > a rJ g Fir PI Fir St k W Project Description Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb r- from SR-104 to 9th Ave S Project Benefit This project will improve pedestrian con Edmonds and City Park. Estimated Project Cost $3,180,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total m the HAWK signal to Pine St and along Pine St Cedar St Spruce St N w a 2 H rn d U_ Pine Sr d V 0 N O N A N 0 N N m O O L 4- 0 c O c m to a� a resicfftial areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown $265,000 W,000 $2,650,000 $26 FOO $265,000 $2,650,000 $265,000 $265,000 $2,650,000 $265,000 $265,000 $2,650,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 125 52 i r Sierra Park m CO O 2OF Q O Z z �9 L J W � a 192nd Pi SW w Project Descriptio Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW Long Walkway List of the 2015 Trw Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost $678,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total a rr Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in $100,00 $578,00 $678,00 $678,00 $678,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 53 Packet Pg. 126 0.' I --=wadKv5L-rt-Ra—� 232nd St Sv1 Salem pabin Hood Dr Edmonds Lutheran Heights Church K-12 v � Friar P E G = Or <LnNottingham Rd Scribe4io In High S O� 235th PI SW O w �W Q 2 236th PI SW 105th,c Hickman o Park a v a a > � a _ o � 23A S W Edmonds Faith 237th P %�� Memorial Community 238th St SW - emetery Church Project Descriptio Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W fro R #10 in the Long Walkway List of the Project Benefit I This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $1,060,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total I d tL tU 00 N O N M N O N N m rn 0 Q. 0 L 4- 0 c 6th Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked ° r Ian. c m to 4) a $1,060,00 $1,060,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 54 Packet Pg. 127 219th st sW w_ ST SW Edmonds Church of God Project Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W fro eratn #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2 Project Benefit I This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $324,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total n. ,JW CO - - ro ESPERANCE ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked 00 N O N M N O N N d 0 Q. 0 a 0 $324,00 $324,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 55 Packet Pg. 128 Ak 1861h St SW 187th St SW 4' 00 .0 u7 Seaview ementary Project Description qqmmw Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W fror #5 in Short Walkway List of the 201- 4 Project Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $328,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 1881h St SW - a St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked FL U a- U_ U O N O N M N O N N d 0 CL 0 L 0 $328,00 $328,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 56 Packet Pg. 129 L ,G may. O O00 jl00 o 2381h St SW :57. o ON 00 r` PFCO CO O p h S1 SW s Mathay Ballinger � Park Project AdPWOOV Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW fro y the 2015 Transportation Plan. Project Benefit I This project would improve pedestrian safety Estimated Project Cost $1,285,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of a a U. 0 00 N O N M N O N N m 0 a 0 a 4- 0 $1,285,00 $1,285,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 57 Packet Pg. 130 7th and Elm Park ' IL 00 Sea Vista P+ ``►sta PI, 220TH ST SW !,�\, �aYL , � a _` — t1J 01 rn rn O p°A/dr GoY° r dy Project Descriptio The walkway project is ranked #6 on th tlix a install approximately 700 feet of ne ewasystemon Elm Wav between 8th Ave. S ande. S. Expense Total $901,974 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $552,047 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $349,927 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $901,974 Prom the 2015 Transportation Plan. The project will rian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N N d 0 Q. 0 L 0 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 58 Packet Pg. 131 Project Description qqmlw Addition of Rectangular Rapid Flashing selected locations throughout the Cit4 Project Benefit Improve safety at pedestrian crossings. Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $20,195 $20,195 7 a v a d v 00 N O N or flashing LED lights around regulatory signs at 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 59 Packet Pg. 132 Project Description The study will evaluate and inventory the City's existing street lighting system and identify gaps in service. The study will also develop a priority list of improvements and cost estimates, standard details for street and pedestrian lighting and policies for the addition of street lights on private developments and addition of street lights within residential neighborhoods. Project Benefit Improve night-time safety of the entire transportation system throughout the City Estimated Project Cost $60,000 Design $60,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $60,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 $60,000 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $60,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 60 Packet Pg. 133 Packet Pg. 134 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 61 Puget Sound .7 aA Edmonds Marsh 0 LLi R Dayton_ St -- Dayton Sf ay, _St - - -- -- - - D a on - m i li N a Maple St c Alder St� a' N N r a Q walru1_s1 a = M Ln Holly Dr I Alder St Howell Way none ;a Hone\and Dr a a' �o c Hemlock Way 10 Project Descriptioll1qQq1NNIl Modify existing lane channelization on 4 ve storage for ferry users. Project Benefit Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and ess to local Estimated Project Cost $380,000 Design Right of Way Construction $380,000 Expense Total $380,00 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $380,000 Funding Source Total $380,000 Seamont Ln a U ii LL U 00 N O N M N O N N d to O rL O L 4— O 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 62 Packet Pg. 135 Packet Pg. 136 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 63 Project Descriptio Install traffic calming devices (such as R Project Benefit Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that q Estimated Project Cost $33,130 (for 2023) Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $3,000 ►�i .' LL tL 00 i O N M N O N - G1 0 O C. O L a 0 speed cushions, or other elements). _ d N L under the is Calming Policy. a $30,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 8,000 1 $18,000 $270,00 - $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,00 $18,000 $18,000 $270,00 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $270,00 $33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $270,00 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 64 Packet Pg. 137 Packet Pg. 138 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 65 Project Description The Plan identifies all existing ADA clef' in t ity Right of Way (such as non -compliant ADA curb ramps, tripping hazards within side m DA driveways, and signalized intersection without Audible Pedestrian Signals (APS). Project Benefit Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City of w Estimated Project Cost $105,000 4e�Ah� Design $105,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $105,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund $105,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $105,000 Packet Pg. 139 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 66 Project Description Update the City's long range transp,. Project Benefit The Transportation Plan serves as the transpfation eleme Transportation Plan is being updated in coor atio existing and projected future land use and trave erns, bicycle and transit infrastructure and services and or an transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital Impr� (CFP). Estimated Project Cost Design $170,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $170,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal $170,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $170,000 a U a- LL U 00 N O N M N �Y d O M _ O d O c O r r c as U) W L y's Comprehensive Plan. The a mprehensive Plan Update. Based upon ortation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, f me^eand projected future tiedevelopment of the six- ment Capital Facilities Plan Packet Pg. 140 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 67 Packet Pg. 141 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 land use and transportation patterns on appropriate street rights -of -way. These projects are intended to increase the livability of a diverse, growing city. Estimated Project Cost -T $3,704,717 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total ARPA Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $204,717 $3,500,000 $204,717 $3,500,000 $204,717 $3,500,000 $204,717 $3,500,000 Packet Pg. 142 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 69 i # f Project DescriptioM� The City of Edmonds proposes the devi infrastructure can both address storm neighborhood and the downtown core 1prototypical sites to demonstrate how green ance the streetscapes to benefit the Hwy 99 This project includes the following elements -IN *Roadway narrow (vehicular capacity retained) 401 *Sidewalks and plan. ng strips expanded •Bioretention planter collecting runoff from the road •Standard landscape beds adjacent bioretention planter picki planter. Project Benefit Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of Edmonds is intended t demonstrate how trees, vegetation, engineered green stormwater solutions, phys' and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening pedestrian crossi ith curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impacts, and reinfor desired land use and transportation patterns on appropriate street rights -of -way. These projects are intended to increase the livability of a diverse, growing city. Estimated Project Cost 7 $1,678,027 Design $78,027 Right of Way Construction $1,600,000 Expense Total $78,027 $1,600,000 ARPA $78,027 Unsecured Funding $1,600,000 Funding Source Total $78,027 $1,600,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 70 s to bioretention FL U a- U_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O 0. O L O c O r c m a� L Packet Pg. 143 7.A.b Water Prniects # UPPROJECT DP # 2023 2024 2025 2026 2028 TOTAL (2023-2028) TOTAL (2029-43) TOTAL Project Cost PWW-01 Phase 12 Annual Replacement Program 2022 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 PWW-02 Phase 13 Annual Replacement Program 2023 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 PWW-03 Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program 2024 $506,128 $3,525,379 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,031,507 $4,031,507 PWW-04 Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program 2025 $0 $526,373 $3,666,379 $0 $0 $0 $4,192,752 $4,192,752 PWW-05 Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program 2026 $0 $0 $547,428 $3,813,034 $0 $0 $4,360,462 1 $4,360,462 PWW-06 Phase 17 Annual Replacement Program 2027 $0 $0 $0 $569,325 $3,965,555 $0 $4,534,880 $4,534,880 PWW-07 Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program 2028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $592,098 $4,124,177 $4,716,275 $4,716,275 PWW-10 2023 Waterline Overlays $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 PW W-11 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades $805,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $805,000 $805,000 PWW-12 Phase 19 Annual Replacement Program 2029 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $615,782 $615,782 $615,782 Total Projects I& f $3,0;&!8 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 $25,016,658 $0 $25,016,658 Funding Source 3 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (2023.2028) (2029.431 Water Fund -421 $3,071,198 ,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 $25.016,658 $25,016,658 Total Revenue 1,1110, 051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 $25,016,658 $0 $25,016,658 a_ U IL LL U 00 N O 04 M N O N 0 N 0 Q 0 L a 0 C O m C 0 N d i a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 72 Packet Pg. 145 Project Description 'q4NOW Per the approved 2017 Water Compre appurtenances at various locations t4 pressure, or more prone to breakage c Nthe jects will replace/maintain pipe and related e ue to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or aterial properties. _ Project Benefit , Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, ire ( breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease Estimated Project Cost $1.7 to $4.1 million/year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Water Fund 421 Funding Source Total m reliability, decrease probability of to day mgAwnce costs. $1,710,000 $3,525,379 $3,666,379 $3,81M4 $3,965,555 $4,124,177 $2,216,128 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 $2,216,128 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 $2,216,128 $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 a U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O CL O L 4- 0 c O M c m a� L 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 73 Packet Pg. 146 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover area the Waterline Replacement Projects. Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locati Projects. Estimated Project Cost Expense Total Water Fund 421 Funding Source Total $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 re excavated and patched in previous years as part of and patched due to Waterline Replacement 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 74 Packet Pg. 147 v i85th PI SW 0 Yost Farr Project Descriptioi This work is being done to provide strrin potable water storage reservoirs. Pr magnitude/preliminary costs and next steps f report for the Yost Reservoir, which is comp) plus repairs to address leakage from the res process of being finalized, shows similar issues 186th PI SW Seeaaview Water Tank es, Ir leakages, and upgrades to our two underground n mpleted in early 2022 were used to determine order of the now planned repairs and upgrades project. Preliminary shows that it a major structural and seismic retrofit, sir. Pre' p for the Seaview Reservoir, which is in the I ery but to a somewhat lesser scale. Proiect Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overaIm em retrofit structures so that they meet current structural codes decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost '®� Design $805,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $805,000 Water Fund 421 $805,000 Funding Source Total $805,000 decr'We probability of leakage, , iliency 0#469 earthquakes, and W a r a 00 a 00 tU 00 N O N M N O N d 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 75 Packet Pg. 148 #fi �' -. R� �1 • . Y ��11 Y.. +` � `(47,( �{�+ ��y�_ ttiR�., Al Jam— •. • �. �.` �.� r� fix+ ;... t&I a •; jr 7.A.b m 00 fV O N M N O N O 0. O a` O f_ O CO fy a Packet Pg. 149 7.A.b Stormwater Projects HCFP PROJECT DP 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Y028 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Proj # (2023-2028) (2029-43) Cost Edmonds Marsh tuary Restoration Related Projects .-. PWD-01 I X I Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements Phase 1) 1 $366,843 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $366,843 $366,£ d V Perrinville Creek Basin Projects d PWD-03 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects $120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $620,000 $620,( PWD-04 X Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Phase 1 $750,000 $500,000 $2,800,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $7,050,000 $7,050,( PWD-05 X Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 $10,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $150,000 $10,( $150,( PWD-23 Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update L,L U 00 N O N r M N Storm Drainage Improvement Projects O N PWD-06 Lake Ballinger Re ional Facility Design PhaseAir $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,( 70 d PWD-07 I X Balinger Regional acility Construction Phase Aff $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,( N PWD-22 1 7317 Lake Ballin er Way Flood lain Purchase & Structure Re AW,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $750,( 00. O L Annually Funded Projects d PWD-11 Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2023 $290,00 $1,622,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,912,400 $1,912 , PWD-12 Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2024 $0 $324,480 $1,687,296 $337,460 $0 $1,754,786 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,011,776 $2,092,246 $2,011,i $2,092,: PWD-13 Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2025) $ $0 PWD-14 Phase 7 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2026 $0 $0 $350,958 $1,824,977 $0 $2,175,935 $2,175,£ PWD-15 Phase 8 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2027) $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,996 $1,897,976 $2,262,972 1 $2,262,t PWD-16 Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2029 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,596 $379,596 PWD-19 2023 SD Overlays $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,( 4- 0 C O r r C d to d L a Compliance Related Projects PWD-17 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,00011 $600,( LL ci Total Projects $3,236,843 $7,924, 756 ,205,744 $2,289,973 $2,377,572 $23,781,768 $0 $23,781,7 d U Funding Source 77= 2023 202 20 2026% 2027 2028 TOTAL (2023-2028) TOTAL (2029-43) TOTAL Stormwater Utility Fund -422 $ 1,834,220 $ 2,2 ,776 ,672,693 IqMkk2,955,744 $ 9,973 $ 2,377,572 $ 15,422,978 $ 15,422,9 ARPA Funds $ 681,116 $ 454,1 2,002,063 $ V - $ - $ 3,137,283 $ 3,137,2 Secured Grants $ 721,507 $ - $ - $ $ - $ 721,507 $ 721,5 Unsecured Grants $ - $ - $ 2,250,000 $ 2,250 - $ - 1 $ 4,500,000 is 4,500,0 Total Revenue $ 3,236,843 $ 2,746,880 $ 7,924,756 $ 5 4 $ 2,289,973 $ 2,377,572 $ 23,781,768 jr-$ 23,781,7 #or to Y O 3.1 B 3 a 00 N O N M N O N C G1 E s w Q 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 77 Packet Pg. 150 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 78 Edmonds Marsh �. Q vn�ori � 0�,;, N 00,h'ad� OZ .yea 0 W Project Descripti The project will be improving water jrEdr side of SR-104, along the frontage of include water quality filter cartridges. Staff p discharges that directly enter the marsh fron 1 replacing the catch basins on the west side side of SR-104. Wildlife Refuge Walnut St- �I I Q Howell V Ifl M, I � City Park ay a V m 0 a o a 4- 0 a aunoff by replacing existing catch basins along the west dshe catch basins will be replaced with catch basins that = loses this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all w L Iese locations. T ct will be divided into phases, with phase a SR-104 r ase replacing the catch basins on the east ft Project Benefit AV Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Ed located near the marsh. The improvements will provide betl Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction $366,843 Expense Total $366,843 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $152,836 ARPA Funds Secured Grants $214,007 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $366,843 rtions of SR-104 on to the marsh 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 79 Packet Pg. 152 Packet Pg. 153 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 80 Ilt►1 Project Description Reducing scouring flows to reduce sedOfFre s Pe ille Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critical elems in reek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The projects funded by this pr am are incremental ste s toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish habitat. These efforts have be a even more cr' ' en recent challenges around the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program i fund for ' ti projects within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff esp to ad -hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available for c rant applicA&ns for flow reductions projects. Project Benefit The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, im peak flow events. Estimated Project Cost $100,000/year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $110,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 bed scour during a U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O OM O L O c O c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 81 Packet Pg. 154 Puget Sound Project Description The city has struggled to manage and raintenal :edimentation, ed outfall system at Perrinville Creek. The current combination of multiple stake holde eek and undersized culverts creates several issues which make the creek unsustainable aem. The concern must be addressed from the bottom of the creek up in order to sequence the reli s correctly. The improvements are needed to relieve current flooding, ease City, a provide better and more sustainable fish habitat. This project will build on any interim BNto lace the existing BNSF culvert and a new culvert under Talbot Road which is fully compliant with managem and fish passage regulations. It will also include time and effort to research and apply fontal/add* a ding sources so that the project can be built. This complex project includes many ers. It i mate a minimum 2-year design and development phase will be needed before by for ion. 46, Project Benefit The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and Estimated Project Cost $7,050,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $750,000 $500,000 $2,800,000 $3,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $2,800,000 $3,000,000 $68,884 $45,896 $797,937 $750,000 $681,116 $454,104 $2,002,063 $ 2, 250, 000 $750,000 $500,000 $2,800,000 $3,000,000 N A a U d u_ U 00 N O N A N O N d N O CL O L O c O c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 82 Packet Pg. 155 Seaview Park 185th St SW a S j �. v i N M CO CO 186th St SW Post >2 Off ICE r 185th PI SW Project Descriptioi dpwoor Reducing scouring flows in order to red e is I in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critica men f r g this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The project is an incre tal step toward recovering this stream run as an adequate fish habitat. The grant for this project has alread een secured. Th, t proposes construction of an infiltration system in Seaview Park, almost identical to t success ect which was completed in 2019, in order to infiltrate more runoff in the Perrinville Creek Design Right of Way Construction $10,000 Expense Total $10,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $2,500 ARPA Funds Secured Grants $7,500 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $10,000 a U a ILL U 00 N O N M N O N N d N O O L 4- 0 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 83 Packet Pg. 156 Project Descriptioi -q"MPP- Supplemental study to update Perrinvil E projects that would help decrease th ak < Project will be updated to reflect projects co basin to aid in the reduction of peak flows in Project Benefit Pit "- Ile Lynnwood Wanalysis that determined possible locations for i ing high rain events. !ted and also determine if there are other locations within the basin. Improve overall basin and stream health, by using green storm that rainfall is not simply collected and conveyed downstream conditions. This includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as stream peak flows, which will decrease stream erosion and im Estimated Project Cost Design $150,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $150,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $150,000 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $150,000 ods. This will make it so )se as possible to natural )is will also decrease O%kt for aquatic life. FL U a U- U 00 N O N M N O N d N O OM O L O c O c m a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 84 Packet Pg. 157 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 85 L o s CO 0D 2401h St SW Mathay Ballinger Park 79th P� nd Project Descripti 00 r- r- r- LLI a 240th PI SW = 241 st St SW U H LL U n 00 N O N M N O N d N O CL O IL 4- 0 c Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flood' rcility, blooms along with other water quality impairments. ° The Highway 99 corridor is an area o dcluding a future City project which will require stormwater mitigation. By creating a regionity can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved u, by development, addressed stormwater mitirt Highway project, and treat runoff from a one of the City bigger pollution generating a s. The ' as Ily improve Lake Ballinger water quality. The project proposes to implement water qualit trol provements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would si tly benefit Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutiliz park. This imited to design and production of plans and specifications; construction phase will tracked eparat ject (to ease and simplify grant management/reporting). Project Benefit The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit thej conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. Estimated Project Cost $200,000 Design $200,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $200,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $200,000 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $200,000 3thay-Ballinger d habitat 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 86 Packet Pg. 159 co 2401h St SW 3C Mathay Ballinger Park 79th 4P 240th PI SW pl nd Project Descripti r� i1 L CO r` 241 st St SW A Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flood' rionneeds blooms along with other water quality impairments. The Highway 99 corridor is an area o dcluding a future City project which will require stormwater mitigation. By creating a regionity can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development, addressed stormwater mitir t Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger pollution generating aas Ily improve Lake Ballinger water quality. This phase is limited to the construction phase a e ked separate project (to ease and simplify grant management/reporting) Project Benefit The project proposes to implement water quality and flow co of Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would signifi conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, Estimated Project Cost $3,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $750,000 $ 2, 250, 000 $3,000,000 d Mathay-Ballinger kand habitat a U a LL U 00 N O N M N 0 N m O CL O L- a. 4- 0 c O c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 87 Packet Pg. 160 vela -._.. 4f R: T• i TT. T: Project Description The project proposes to purchase an a ,6 Ballinger flood plain. The City secure4r5oc the lowest property on the lake and is badly uninhabitable. It is also nearly undevelopabl d U v_ U 00 N O N N - N a- '+nr•h77u d m �rr m- m sn r .r •• " �L. m r_.•r. �^ -s• : .r,. yr s r" - - 0 a , 104 Q 0 0 c 00ment r dential property located within the Lake ° of Ecology grant to aid in this process. The home is naged from previous flooding to the point it is generally u0i ue to the flood d critical area regulations onsite. a The City intends to remove the home and any p e tin effort on the site. The grant has restrictions for allowing this the structures and impervious surfaces, the planned site use wo City storm drain line for SR-104 cuts through in an easement i pursue a future project to split appropriate flows from the Cit maximum extent feasible. The future project would provide w e highway (SR-104) and would make significant improvement in wa course to Lake Washington via McAleer Creek. Project Benefit ro rfaces from the site as part of the initial be used f ublic use. After demolition of be for pu benefit only. Because the iately cent t ' parcel, the City plans to �m ide water trea ality tment to the y trea t for a eavily trafficked qualitv to La a Ball in is downstream Improve the health and water quality of Lake Ballinger by removing hard surfaM and a home that is generally uninhabitable. Project will also provide a future location to treat stormwater runoff from portions SR-104. Estimated Project Cost $750,000 Design Right of Way $750,000 Construction Expense Total $750,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $250,000 Secured Grants $500,000 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $750,000 Packet Pg. 161 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 88 Packet Pg. 162 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 89 Project Descriptio ppp� Annual storm drain replacement/maint c infrastructure in several locations th ou• firsthand knowledge or video inspection resu lifespan and requires routine replacement or conduct annual maintenance projects will Q Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total r M FL �+ a LL 0 00 N O N ACI } O N ML d to O Q. O a` 4- 0 c cts jects propose to replace or rehab storm drain cations of work identified by City crews and staff via Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its useful air to preserve ction of the storm drain system. Failure to a` se cha r rain system failure. $1,622,400 $1,687,296 $1,754,786 $1,824,977 $1,897,976 $290,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 $290,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 $290,000 $1,946,880 $2,024,756 $2,105,744 $2,189,973 $2,277,572 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 90 Packet Pg. 163 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas the Annual Storm Maintenance Proj Project Benefit WV Improve overall pavement condition in locati s Replacement Projects. Estimated Pr $200,000 Design $15,000 Right of Way Construction $185,000 Expense Total $200,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $200,000 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $200,000 re excavated and patched in previous years as part of and patched due to the Annual Storm a v a u- 0 00 N O N M N O N d N O C. O L a 4- 0 _ 0 c� m N O L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 91 Packet Pg. 164 Packet Pg. 165 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 92 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Funding Source Total $600,000 $600,000 emuYi � 1 r - ! EOMOHOS mnwy fw NAM s+ NRnF9Y i J d U CL LL U 00 N O N M N O N d N O M O L 4- 0 O r r L 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 93 Packet Pg. 166 DC W 3 W H 'i " . - .�".'% '^' - ..F •may k � Y -- _ .'" ' ' _•'irk` - .'.�''r - - - - 7.A.b Sower Prniects # UPPROJECT OP # 2024 2025 2026 2028 TOTAL (2023-2028) TOTAL (2029-43) TOTAL Project Cost PWS-01 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2022 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 PWS-02 Phase 10 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2023 $1,689,212 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,689,212 $1,689,212 PWS-03 Phase 11 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2024 $349,517 $1,964,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,314,297 $2,314,297 PWS-04 Phase 12 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2025 $0 $363,498 $2,043,372 $0 $0 $0 $2,406,870 $2,406,870 PWS-05 Phase 13 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2026 $0 $0 $378,038 $2,125,107 $0 $0 $2,503,145 1 $2,503,145 PWS-06 I Phase 14 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2027 $0 $0 $0 $393,160 $2,210,111 $0 $2,603,271 $2,603,271 PWS-07 Phase 15 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $408,886 $2,298,515 $2,707,401 $2,707,401 PWS-10 Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabiliation $0 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 $610,210 $2,825,211 $2,825,211 PWS-11 Lake Ballinger Sewer e7PWS-15 $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 PWS-12 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 3 $423,710 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $423,710 $423,710 PWS-14 2023 SS Overlays $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Phase 16 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2029Iff $0 $0 $0 $0 $425,242 $425,242 $425,242 Total Projects 1%6— '0 �, $3,849,889 $8,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $2,908,725 $24,703,117 $0 $24,703,117 Funding Source 2023 24 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (2023.2028) (2029-43) 1 Sewer Fund -423 mmmS $3,849,889 $8,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $2,908,725 $24,703,117 $24,703,117 Total Revenue $2,692,439 $3,849,889 $8,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $2,908,725 $24,703,117 $0 $24,703,117 a_ U IL LL U 00 N O CV M N O N 0 to 0 Q 0 a 0 C 0 �-r m C d N 0 L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 95 Packet Pg. 168 Project Description INMOOV Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comp re various locations throughout the Cit 0 to breakage due to its material properties Project Benefit , Improve system reliability and capacity, decrea day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $1.7 to $2.7 million/year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total jects will replace pipe and related appurtenances at undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone breakages, and decrease overall $1,619,212 $1,964,780 $2,043,372 $2,121W7 $2,210,111 $2,298,515 $2,068,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 $2,723,757 $2,068,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 $2,723,757 $2,068,729 $2,328,278 $2,421,410 $2,518,267 $2,618,997 $2,723,757 d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O M O L 4- 0 c O c m a� L 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 96 Packet Pg. 169 . � � tnsitu(vrm Project Descriptio Per the approved 2013 Sewer Compre e line existing sewer mains that are su by this trenchless method. Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total nd ent video inspections of sewer mains, the project will tr , infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 $610,210 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 $610,210 $521,611 $542,475 $564,174 $586,741 $610,210 a v IL IL 0 CO N O N O i N d N O C. O aL 4- 0 C 0 c� m N O L IL Packet Pg. 170 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 97 t5F t:KANC.t _ asw •^ Holly Ln Mi Tr , R Maple 12341h`S11•SW— 3IT 234th St SW a Madrona Ln n O mac- Z w tOj1 236th St SW Q 236th St SW' 236th S1 SW- r II� C 9L St SW 238TH ST SW 23sth St SW a' lie - `;W 240th Si SW d 242nd St SW z`\ d St S a S 2-5 t c0 —�.9 244TH ST SW V Project Descripti 232nd St svJ�232nd St SW 232nd St �,,4 Y 235thStSw '°sw I�zl —1 235TH PL SW_ 236TH ST SW rn ^+' Jy, Of� II a D n I n � z m � N Lake � 4m Ballinger t _BALLI.NGER_WAY.�244TH�ST=$WJ `� l r.,•., _ Per the approved 2013 Sewer Compreral I nd ent video inspections of sewer mains, the sewer pipe along Lake Ballinger will require addi a n the near future. These improvements are needed to account for population growth, reduce Infiltn and Inflow from thepipe and improve maintenance and emergency access for this major trunk syste Project Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration al maintenance costs. Improved access will help ease maintenan decease any chance of potential sewer spills into Lake Ballinge Estimated Project Cost Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 overall day to day 1gncies, which will further a. gth5, L y i () a 00 N N A 242ryd 0 N N to 0 Q. 0 L a. 4- 0 c 0 c m to M a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 98 Packet Pg. 171 Project Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comp line existing sewer mains that are su by this trenchless method. Project Benefit , Improve system reliability and capacity, decrea day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost $423,710 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total $368,710 $423,710 $423,710 $423,710 a U d u_ U 00 N O N C N d N O O L Q. O r- ent video inspections of sewer mains, the project will ° r Itration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired r m U) breakages, and decrease overall 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 99 Packet Pg. 172 Project Description Road pavement overlays to cover are, - the Sanitary Sewer Replacement Pry 4 Project Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locati Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total $188,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 re excavated and patched in previous years as part of and patched due to Sanitary Sewer 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 100 Packet Pg. 173 LU f PPO um lk k C A L F Mm- -u- m •b. " Q 101 AWL: 7.A.b Farilities Proier-ts # CFP PROJECT DP # 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL (2023-2028) TOTAL (2029-43) TOTAL Project Cost PWF-01 Boys and Girls Club U $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $282,398 $0 $282,398 PWF-02 Cemete Buildin $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $17,657 $0 $17,657 PWF-03 Ci Hall $323,246 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $1,011,887 $0 $1,011,887 PWF-04 Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station $70,000 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $84,060 $0 $84,060 PWF-05 Frances Anderson Center 1 $525,002 $298,378 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 $1,136,235 $0 $1,136,235 PWF-06 Fire Station 16 k, $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $215,406 $0 $215,406 PWF-07 Fire Station 17 $81,545 $100,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $598,287 $0 $598,287 PWF-08 Fire Station 20 $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $244,069 $0 $244,069 PWF19 Fire Life Safety Communications $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 PWF-09 Historic Log Cabin $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 $90,764 $0 $90,764 PWF-10 Historical Museum $63,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $107,909 $0 $107,909 PWF-11 I ILlbrary $231.077 $53,3251 $45,038 $35,000 $0 $389,440 $0 $389,440 PWF-23 Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $0 $4,900,000 PWF12 Meadowdale Club House $93,426 $3,665 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $115,681 $0 $115,681 PWF-13 Old Public Works $107,743 $24,308 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $231,570 $0 $231,570 PWF-14 Parks Maintenance Building $70,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $214,863 $0 $214,863 PWF-20 Parks Restrooms Maintenance 0 $50,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $100,000 $305,000 $0 $305,000 PWF-15 Public Safety $445,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $1,297,964 $0 $1,297,964 PWF-16 Public Works O&M $201,570 $218,643 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $673,697 $0 $673,697 PWF-21 Public Works EV Conduit Addition $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $125,000 PWF-17 Wade James Theater $18,600 $99 ,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $324,163 $0 $324,163 PWF-18 I Yost Pool House $65,570 8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $179,623 $0 $179,623 PWF-22 I I City Park Gazebo Roof $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Total Projects $2,112,978 $1,926, $1,156,277 $1,198,987 $624,000 $12,655,673 $0 $12,655,673 Funding Source 2023 2024 2025 IAJV2026 TOTAL (2023-2028) TOTAL (2029-43) TOTAL Fund 016 2021 Facilities Bond $1,127,151 $1,388, 6 $0 $0 $2,968,461 $0 $2,968,461 Fund 016 non-bondproceeds) $819,995 $432,081 $2 $76,5 $31,500 $2,315,378 $0 $2,315,378 General Fund $25,000 $0 IfV8,481 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 Water Utility Fund 421 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 $0 $12,500 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 $0 $12,500 Sewer Utility Fund 423 $12,500 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $12,500 $0 $12,500 Unsecured Funding$90,832 $106,074 $25,000 $46AJW $1,122,395 $592,500 $7,296,834 $0 $7,296,834 Total Revenue $2,112,978 $1,926,669 $1,156,277 W62 $1,198,987 $624,000 $12,655,673 $0 $12,655,673 a_ U IL LIL 00 N O N M N O N 0 to 0 Q 0 tr a 0 C 0 fC C d N d >r a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 102 Packet Pg, 175 Project Description This building built in 1900 was the origi el Field and not part of the large Civic F* Park Snohomish County Boys and Girls Club in par building has sustained some interior settling back stairway. It has significant need for maj years. Renovation and deferred maintenance r47 e f monds High School. The property is located at Civic st project. The building is solely operated by the rship with the City's Parks and Recreation department. The twill require i repair to back hallway floors and the renovat' e cted to be in operation for another 10 n e buil g value in its current location. Projects: Exterior plumbing access, Window replacement, Roof Plumbing replacement, Front entry door replacement, Fire Alar Baseboard heating replacement Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A we safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace of and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for b designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $282,398 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total DA Access, nkler updates, op g conditions and to I ntained facility creates a cy and confidence. Routine ding systems to operate as $150,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $150,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $150,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $150,034 $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 a U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N i d N O O d 4- 0 c O c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 103 Packet Pg. 176 �mox�ds Meraokuu, s ��ETekY r Project Description This small structure houses the Edmom fun services and the cemetery Sextant office. The building is in relatively good conditio d ha tt red maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be needed as t nology dictates. Projects: Minor repair and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assur fe and erty ope n conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exp ed lif n. ell -main d facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes place a ncy and 'dence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p vides for building sy s perate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $17,657 Construction\Professional Services $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 Expense Total $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 Unsecured Funding $3,377 $818 $1,000 Funding Source Total $1,954 $2,094 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 a- LL U 00 N O N M N O N _ d N O 4_ M O L O c O c m a� L 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 104 Packet Pg. 177 ., 4 Project Description City Hall was built in 1979 and was ope renovated the building in the 1990s. City renovations were completed. The building is maintenance. . � . PF , .. W t siness office center until the City purchased and Wd Edmonds City Hall from this location since the r original condition and needs substantial repair and Projects: All Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing re ement, Restroom remodels w/gender neutral consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and rep fIrt, Lobby r del, Entry Awning re -glazing, Interior Painting, ADA accessibility improvements. Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure salifespan.Awell-maiin ope perati assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficienc and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for buil ys designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $1,011,887 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total GJWitions and to 'lity creates a I confidence. Routine ems to operate as $150,000 $323,246 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $150,000 $323,246 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $323,246 $129,064 $150,000 $150,000 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $150,000 $323,246 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 I.L U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O CL O d 4- 0 c O c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 178 105 -db~ r Project Description The Pier was recently renovated and is ra oo ndition. The Beach Ranger Office is a 1200 square foot office and restroom facility located he e e e pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operate out of this facility. Projects: Electrical panel and pier electrical f d replac n epairs, and maintenance Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure a and p assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expe d lifes safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which prom s wo and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p es designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $84,060 ons and to lity creates a nce. Routine perate as Construction\Professional Services $70,000 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 Expense Total $70,000 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $70,000 $2,971 $2,918 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 Funding Source Total $70,000 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 IL v IL u_ 0 00 N O N M N O N d to O C. O IL 4- 0 a 0 c� m N O L a Packet Pg. 179 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 106 Project Description The Frances Anderson Center serves as +hiu n eation center offering arts, athletic and cultural programing year round. Due to the a the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or restoration. _ Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers witIVIectric Replacement of all exterior doors (24 ea), New, appropriate), Plumbing drainage collector, Gym Floor, Drinki gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fi classroom flooring, Addition of building security card readers, Alarm replacement, Fire Sprinkler replacement. Oil tank reme Project Benefit X,0will add ventilation, cooling and heating, sures, New Windows (historically tains ADA c liant, Restroom remodels (w/ s, Replace everal common area and ding HV ontrol aximize efficiency, Fire ion, building ALcompliance efforts. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A we safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace of and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for b designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $1,136,235 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $525,002 $298,378 $98,892 $525,002 $298,378 $98,892 $525,002 $298,378 $98,892 $525,002 $298,378 $98,892 op g conditions and to I ntained facility creates a cy and confidence. Routine ding systems to operate as $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 107 Packet Pg. 180 Project Description IqqIMMPP� This facility is operated by South Snoho of 10,700 square feet. The building i air replacements to remain operationally ready Projects: roll -up bay door controller replace updates. Fir d Rescue and was built in 2003 and has a building area 1itl will require some infrastructure updates or the needs of the City. _ t, gutter replacement, interior coatings Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assur fe and erty ope n conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exp ed lif n. ell main t d facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes place a ncy and 'dence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p vides for buildings s perate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $215,406 Construction\Professional Services $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 Expense Total $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $47,689 $69,388 Unsecured Funding $1,591 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 Funding Source Total $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 IL v a u_ 0 00 N O N M N O N d to O C. O L IL 4- 0 c 0 m N L a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 108 Packet Pg. 181 Project Description IRRIMMINIP� This building is operated by South Snoh 9,800 square feet. This building has om operationally ready. i Ilia - li�i ISM F rnd Rescue, was built in 1999 and has a building area of will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain Projects: bay door assessment, drainage upd1W lect ' r u ceiling replacement. Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assur fe anc assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exp ed lif safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes I and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p"Ovid designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $598,287 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total re updates, roof soffit enclosure, bay $81,545 $100,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $81,545 $100,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $81,545 $100,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $81,545 $100,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 is and to r creates a e. Routine rate as $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d O M O d 4- 0 c 0 r c m a� L 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 109 Packet Pg. 182 Project Description IRRIMMIPP� This building is the eldest of the City's t $sificant on d is operated by South County Fire and Rescue. This station serves Esperance and suppor a stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. The building has haupdates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior and HVAC system updates. Projects: storm water drainage system, interior oo to Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assur fe and assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exp ed evidr, safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotesand preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $244,069 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total re replacement conditions and to Nd facileity creates a dnce. Routine s Aerate as $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $20,000 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 a U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O 0. O L O c 0 r c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 110 Packet Pg. 183 d U ti • 6 � ,f Project Description This Historic log cabin is home to the E d be Commerce visitor center, the structure was a purpose built cabin from the turn of the cent he s c rofessionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and requires only minor main ance and upkeep annually. Projects: new thick cut shingle replacement, inking o nish Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure e and pr y o ting conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expe d lifes well m ined facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which prom s wo ce ciency a nfidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p es for b ing syste operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $90,764 Construction\Professional Services $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Expense Total $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $80,000 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $888 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Unsecured Funding $5,969 Funding Source Total $80,000 $888 $546 $1,361 $12,438 $1,500 Packet Pg. 184 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 � .. EWV. - V Y. a: � � *},�� -, � 'tom • � _ - [r; A r Project Description The 110-year-old original Carnegie Libr ui s ho to the Edmonds Museum. The building is on the State of Washington Historic registry and een II fined over the last several years. Buildings of this age require specialized maintenance and coordin on with the state historic architect to maintain the historic status. Structural stabilization and weatherproofing the most signif' orities to maintain this facility. Projects: minor structural reinforcement, entry f a y re r, lower entry restoration Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assur fe and erty ope n conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exp ed lif n. ell main t d facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes place a ncy and 'dence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p vides for building sy s perate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $107,909 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $63,089 $15,000 $10,000 $63,089 $15,000 $10,000 $50,000 $15,000 $10,000 $13, 089 $63,089 $15,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $4,621 $10,199 $4,621 $10,199 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 a U d v_ U 00 N O N M N O N d 0 CL 0 L 4- 0 c 0 r c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 112 Packet Pg. 185 1.w1tM% N FiE CR�eS cV O - N d N -�' O O Project Description o c The Edmonds Library is operated by th -I ar em with exception of the Second floor Plaza room ° r rental space. The library is a 19,000 re fo bu uilt in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and r daily Library programming and community se ces. This is one of the City's most heavily used buildings by the public and has significant deferred maintena needs, include ilcling facade and plaza deck a - waterproofing. IN -.9990ppp,- A Projects: window replacement, ADA access device upgrades cement, ge creation, Plaza Room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza Room installati building cladding, exterior stairway restoration, HVAC ventilate an repl eni exterior planter box replacement and waterproofing, flood da ge re Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A we safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace of and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for b designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $389,440 Construction\Professional Services $25,000 $231,077 Expense Total $25,000 $231,077 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $25,000 $150,902 Unsecured Funding $80,175 Funding Source Total $25,000 $231,077 c restroom ?storation or ✓vay remodel, op g conditions and to I ntained facility creates a cy and confidence. Routine ding systems to operate as $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 113 Packet Pg. 186 Lf � iy Y ~' +,rr� lr •45. y x.` t�4F' Jti �� }1 . � Fri �"I' �a•+[.fR�}�£ r^.i��._}1Si' Project Description IIIIIII M-r a f f This 4000 square foot facility was built ' 6 o ity theater facility and later was transformed into the Meadowdale community club house buil g ently owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses the City operated Meadowdale pre-s of and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental facility. This facility while dated has been well aintained and o ires minor maintenance and repairs. Projects: minor maintenance and repairs, interi g pai g, and bath fixture replacement. Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assur fe and erty ope n conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exp ed lif n. ell main t d facility creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes place a ncy and 'dence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p vides for building sy s perate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $115, 681 Construction\Professional Services $93,426 $3,665 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 Expense Total $93,426 $3,665 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $93,426 $3,665 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $93,426 $3,665 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 a v a U. 0 00 N O N M N O N d to O 0. O L IL 4- 0 c 0 M m N O L IL 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 114 Packet Pg. 187 Project Descri0io This facility was built in 1965 to house 0 tenant space and City storage, as we Edt adjacent to the Waste Water Treatment Pla dictate. Building is primarily used as storage readiness. lic ks Department, the building was converted in 1995 to ds arge evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property nd could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements will need some to maintain current operational Projects: HVAC updates, roll -up door replacement, parking to acing, secu ' camera system. Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assur afe a ro operate assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte span. A mainta safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes orkplace efficiency a and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for buildin designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $231,570 onditions and to i cility creates a n nce. Routine ems to operate as Construction\Professional Services $107,743 $24,308 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 Expense Total $107,743 $24,308 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $22,308 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $30,000 Unsecured Funding $77,743 $24,308 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 Funding Source Total $107,743 $46,616 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 a U IL u_ 0 00 N O N M N O N d to O C. O L IL 4- 0 c 0 m N L IL Packet Pg. 188 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 115 Project Description This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Hun foot facility now houses all City Facili per seasonal help) This Facility is home to the Ci repair shop and Parks and Facilities mainten This Facility is near end of life and is undersi facility. V c W1)n was the City Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square ° and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ c arpentry Shop, Key Sho , City Flower program, Parks engine u) a� e supply stora as Parks and Facilities Manager offices. a to sup p ental staffing that are assigned to this Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational capa�ADA replacement, Pine St. facility exit, exterior painting. Project Benefit IT N Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure saOandproperty ope assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well m- safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace effid and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for b g designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $214,863 Construction\Professional Services $70,789 $40,320 $9,349 Expense Total $70,789 $40,320 $9,349 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $70,789 $40,320 $9,349 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $70,789 $40,320 $9,349 tes, shop floor -a o?IIWons and to fined facility creates a and confidence. Routine systems to operate as $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 116 Packet Pg. 189 Project Description IqqINNPP� The Public Safety building houses Ed mo Chambers. The building was built in en government uses. The building houses one c simulator facilities and evidence processing life and has a significant amount of deferred 19-liilill"�i r W U d lit- LL U 00 N O N M N O N d N O O c epa ent, Edmonds Municipal Court and the City Council ° r ipa 0,000 square feet of office, court and municipal r e City emergency operations centers, large police training, a� storage. The b as had minimal system updates over it's a intena o e retrofitted with new fire sprinklers. Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replacemel reconfiguration to meet current usage, fire sprinkler installati sleeping room remodel and gender specific/neutral accommc windows is specific locations, courts flat roof replacement. solar pl rior half , ge Project Benefit - N Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A we safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace of and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for b designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $1,297,964 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Ilation, parking lot vation and painting, 6blic restrooms, operable op g conditions and to I ntained facility creates a cy and confidence. Routine ding systems to operate as $50,967 $445,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $50,967 $445,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $445,276 $50,967 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $50,967 $445,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 117 Packet Pg. 190 VMF, d U LL r '• � . '� N N ■ _ M ■ e— — - N O N a) N O M O L IL Project Description o c This building built in 1995 houses four P c div' s and the auxiliary City Emergency Operations Center. ° r This building is 28,000 square feet a capa o tions 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The building has significant deferretements, aintenance needs and infrastructure updates. u°', a) L Projects: vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit rep e r material bunkers, ventilation fan a replacements, fire alarm system replacement, 1 o rest m remodel with gender inclusivity U_ U considerations, electric vehicle charging and maintenance in ture, emer y communications updates, a interior hallway flooring thresholds, utility bay HVAC replaceme water ma' ment (building connection). U Project Benefit f Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure saf d prope peratin itions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte ifespan. A well main d ity creates a safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficienc d confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for buil ystems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $598,697 Construction\Professional Services $201,570 $218,643 Expense Total $201,570 $218,643 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $218,643 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $126,570 General Fund $25,000 Water Fund 421 $12,500 Stormwater Fund 422 $25,000 Sewer Fund 423 $12,500 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $201,570 $218,643 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 118 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $5 Packet Pg. 191 Project Descriptio This community theater was built by th ft PJ theater group in 1967 and was deeded to City ownership at a later date. The facilit 300 ua size and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City meetings. The City's ntenanresponsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot, roofing, and grounds. Project Benefit 401 Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assui assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exp safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which prom and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $324,163 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total rating conditions and to Ctained facility creates a confidence. Routine sys%s to operate as $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $18,600 $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 a U d u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O OM O d 4- 0 c O r c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 119 Packet Pg. 192 ' �W= rM # P r- ` T R t T + RI 7 r } Y- Y ,i Jy M r �•y •a U. • � -ed 00 * * * N 11 O N ` N O _ - } N -•• - r •'yry Zr YZ • �%! L 0 IL Project Description o c This recreational facility houses the Cit ' u ogr g and some Parks and Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the pool house historical) was o e e nall The tenant run aquatic programing is currently c° p Y p Y• q p g g Y c expanding to year round lap and team aquati ctivities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility requires minimal ma enance to rema' tional and is subject to tenant lease terms a` of use. Projects: security updates, roof replacement, gutter replace umbing fixt updates, exterior door replacements, operational repair and maintenance to accommo e 365 op o Project Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure saf d prope perati assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte ifespan. A well main safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficienc and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for buil y5 designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. Estimated Project Cost $179,623 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $65,570 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $65,570 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $65,570 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $65,570 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 GJWitions and to d • ity creates a i confidence. Routine ems to operate as $30,389 $30,000 $30,389 $30,000 $30,389 $30,000 $30,389 $30,000 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 120 Packet Pg. 193 Project Description All fire and life safety systems are requl o nit 24/7 in case of emergency. Previously this monitoring has been done by traditional phone I' (PO astructure is aging in place and is not required to be maintained by the telecommunications pro rs as of 2020. In 2022 we have had 3 catastrophic communications failures that resulted several thousand dollar xpense and lac Hance with fire code. The City has eleven facilities with life safety monitoring, and six I ations w r aking a total of 17 locations with monitoring requirements that will need to be upi 0. Construction\Professional Services $60,000 Expense Total $60,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $60,000 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $60,000 d LL U 00 N O N M N O N d N O M O L 4- 0 c O c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 121 Packet Pg. 194 Project Description Facilities will take on the responsibility ut in nce at seven Park restroom structures. This maintenance will include Mechanica ctric n ing systems, as well as building envelopes. These structures have traditionally been maintaine Parks and Recreation. All of these structures have significant deferred maintenance and will be added to t Facilities Condit' ssment, for future planning purposes. Project Benefit Maintaining clean and safe Park restrooms helps show case th of Edmon system, while meeting ADA requirements for this type of public facility. Estimated Project Cost $305,000 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $55,000 $50,000 $50,000 $25 $25,000 $100,000 $55,000 $50,000 $50,000 $2 0 $25,000 $100,000 $55,000 $50,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $100,000 $55,000 $50,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $100,000 IL 0 IL a_ 0 00 w N 4 N N M N O N d I to f C Q. O aL 4- 0 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 122 Packet Pg. 195 Project Descriptio The City fleet is rapidly changing to eIF installed once there is demand bey,, 4 Project Benefit Adding infrastructure in anticipation of futu towards mostly electric vehicles. Estimated Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $125,000 $125,000 duit will allow for new EV charging stations to be ity to remain agile while the fleet evolves i1 U a- u_ U 00 N O N M N O N d N O 0. O L O c O r c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 123 Packet Pg. 196 �, ��" �yy M;NN�WAYWALMwi`d'._ '+-..:ka ' 3"f dF.e�.e ti �"Y _ _ �. w y., .� �-..� � �j• � , Y _, .s_6'# ems. Project Description The large round gazebo has a very war composite roof material in a similar Project Benefit The gazebo is a gathering place for groups an ca condition allows for more versatile use of City Pa' Estimated Project Cost $50,000 Construction\Professional Services $50,000 Expense Total $50,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $50,000 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $50,000 at is at end of life. Roof will be replaced with ng this covered space in operational I.L U d U_ U O N O N M N O N d N 0 Q 0 d 0 c 0 r 0 c m a� a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 Packet Pg. 197 124 ItiC Project Description r� r� .aor.r�f The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a gFdin r the and floor of the Edmonds Sno-Isle Library. The deck surface was waterproofed and remo 3, hat project continuous water intrusion has occurred through the waterproof membrane. This wat intrusion has been successfully mitigated over the years and has not been deemed a project of significance pr ously. In 2 118rme Specialty Contractors inspected the water intrusion and offered an initial ROM price to molish he existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the plaza deck and replacement of landscape, plant mshing and hand railings would be a separate construction project. The Parks Director in 2018 ofimate t lace landscaping and irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was perforMLA g to discover any structural consequences from the years of water intrusion, building was tr rally so and water intrusion not factoring in to building structural stability.46, Project Benefit Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partne system. Preservation of the City's physical assets in appropriate condition vs. the a; capital investment. Estimated Project Cost $4,900,000 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total (nth Sno-Isle Library the facility and historic $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 00 N O N M N O N -0 d 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 125 Packet Pg. 198 7.A.b WastawatPr TraatmPnt Plant Prniectc # CFP PROJECT DP # 20 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL (2022-2028) TOTAL (2029-43) TOTAL Project Cost PWP-04 Nutrient Removal Project $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 PWP-05 Prima Clarifier $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $350,000 PWP-06 Joint Sealant $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 PWP-07 Vacuum Filter $187,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $187,453 $0 $187,453 Total Projects � $897,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $897,453 $0 $897,453 Funding Source Edmonds Sewer Fund 423 50.79 % 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL (2022.2028) TOTAL (2029.43) TOTAL $455,816 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $455,816 $0 $455,816 Mountlake Terrace 23.17% $207,940 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $207,940 $0 $207,940 Olympic View Water Sewer District 16.55 % $IA&28 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $148,528 $0 $148,528 City of Shoreline 9.49%AMR&$0 $o $0 $0 $0 $85,168 $0 $85,168 Total Revenue $0 $897,453 $0 $897,453 a_ U IL ILL. U 00 N O N M N O N to O Q O t_ a w O C O fC C d N d a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 127 Packet Pg. 200 Project Description The WA Dept of Ecology has imposed/ic full-scale trial on the Nuvoda Proces discharged from the treatment plant. This re( results and modeling that will be completed and construction in 2025. a U � d LL U CN N O N M N O N . d N O CL O L 4- 0 nd ral Permit upon us. We have conducted a preliminary c r at the process will reduce the total nitrogen that is r st is to begin pre -design of the project based on the full-scale test 022. Pre-desi then be followed by full design in 2024 a Project Benefit , Nutrient reductions have been imposed for our WWTP that the exceeding our cap next year with the return of Edmonds East I once the cap is exceeded. The predesign effort will assist with the permit. Estimated Project Cost Design $300,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $300,000 Sewer Fund 423 $152,370 Mountlake Terrace $69,510 Olympic View Water Sewer District $49,650 City of Shoreline $28,470 Funding Source Total $300,000 to treat. We anticipate have a plan in place kure compliance with 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 128 Packet Pg. 201 .._. . - [ I I�r 31"7:r7L s.i i ihla7l�#•:ry ac,��w WMma LiR [IF' r�k --_ .. __.. -:17 �#� ,Qi�. . ir,:.. , _o.�N: r r f3101 i�-2t Rol pr-� - _=-A�_W[-fkir WjPirsi.b.l !`� ��y.9Imrpe U a- u_ ,�04�_ I — O 0 d Project Description o c The WWTP Annual Capital Replacemen o oje s intended to maintain infrastructure and equipment ° r to ensure that the treatment plant is m a i in oje-ts for 2023 will include the WWTP Primary Clarifier 1 r Rehabilitation, Joint Sealant repairs and a Va m Filter. The 3 I� projects are expected to be delivered for $597,453. a Primary Clarifier #1 cage, center column, feedw rystshould ir, counterweight, skimming device and rake arms need replacement due to severe corrosion. The steeen replace 'nce the original construction. The limited access will require that pieces be assembled iThe nts have been inspected by Re -built it and CH Murphy. Both assessments were that tplace . Project Benefit There is a new design that will improve performance of the sweep rm. Repla ensure that a metal fatigue issue will not cause a catastrophic failure. Estimated Project Cost $350,000 Design Right of Way Construction $350,000 Expense Total $350,000 Sewer Fund 423 $177,765 Mountlake Terrace $81,095 Olympic View Water Sewer District $57,925 City of Shoreline $33,215 Funding Source Total $350,000 is will 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 129 Packet Pg. 202 or A d U d LL U 00 N O N M N O N d N O O w L Project Description o c The WWTP Annual Capital Replacemen o oje s intended to maintain infrastructure and equipment ° r to ensure that the treatment plant is mai in ojects for 2023 will include the WWTP Primary Clarifier 1 r Rehabilitation, Joint Sealant repairs and a Va m Filter. The 3 I� projects are expected to be delivered for $597,453. a Joint Sealant: The Treatment Plant is constructed against another concrete slab, a joint is formed. The joint mL doesn't fill up with debri, fill with water and either leak into a Project Benefit The project will help to maintain the infrastructure and repair Estimated Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction $60,000 Expense Total $60,000 Sewer Fund 423 $30,474 Mountlake Terrace $13,902 Olympic View Water Sewer District $9,930 City of Shoreline $5,694 Funding Source Total $60,000 !e. When one concrete slab is butted up led with joealant to ensure the space or crackAWWter freezes. 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 130 Packet Pg. 203 ISHIGAICI Project Description The WWTP Annual Capital Replacemen to ensure that the treatment plant is em Rehabilitation, Joint Sealant repairs and a Vai $597,453. c oje s intended to maintain infrastructure and equipment ° Nn ,if for 2023 will include the WWTP Primary Clarifier 1 r m Filter. The 3 I projects are expected to be delivered for u, a Vacuum Filter: When the Carbon Recovery Proje current plan is to utilize the ash recovery system from the of either re -built or replaced. Due to the cost of a new vacuum the biochar production utilize the existing filter to ensure pro Project Benefit A vacuum filter is designed to remove water from ash/biochar marketable biochar. - Estimated Project Cost $187,453 Design Right of Way Construction $187,453 Expense Total $187,453 Sewer Fund 423 $95,207 Mountlake Terrace $43,433 Olympic View Water Sewer District $31,023 City of Shoreline $17,789 Funding Source Total $187,452 t iochar will need to be dewatered. The rator. Othe mponents of the system were City staff r mending that start-up of peratio or to t placement. oving the excess ide a more 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 131 Packet Pg. 204 Packet Pg. 205 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 7.A.b UP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023) PROJECTS ADDED Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Transportation 2023 Traffic Signal and Safety Upgrades Estimated future costs for transportation project. Transportation 2023 Pedestrian Safety Program Estimated future costs for transportation project. Transportation Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th / SR-524 to Talbot Rd Estimated future costs for transportation project. Transportation Citywide Lighting Study Estimated future costs for transportation project. Transportation 2023 Guardrail Program Estimated future costs for transportation project. Transportation Green Streets 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 236th St. SW Estimated future costs for transportation project. Transportation Green Streets Dayton St. from 3rd Ave. S to SR-104 Estimated future costs for transportation project. Water 2023 Waterline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements. Water Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades Water Phase 19 Annual Replacement Program (2029) Estimated future costs for waterline replacements. Storm 2023 Stormwater Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to storm replacements Storm 7317 Lake Ballinger Way Purchase & Structure Removal Estimated future costs for storm drainage project. Storm Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update Estimated future costs for storm drainage project. Sewer Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 3 Estimated future costs for sewer project. Sewer 2023 Sanitary Sewer Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewer line replacements. WWTP Primary Clarifier Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project. WWTP Joint Sealant Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project. WWTP Vacuum Filter Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project. Facilities Fire Life Safety Communication Estimated future costs for facilities project. Facilities Parks Restrooms Maintenance Estimated future costs for facilities project. Facilities Public Works EV Conduit Addition Estimated future costs for facilities project. Facilities City Park Gazebo Roof Estimated future costs for facilities project. Facilities Library Plaza Deck Estimated future costs for facilities project. a_ U a U- U 00 N O N M N O N d N O IZ O L d O c O c m m a` a Um U d V N Y L O a N O N A N O N C d E t V O a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 133 Packet Pg. 206 7.A.b CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023) PROJECTS REMOVED Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Transportation 84th Ave W Overlay - 220th St SW to 212th St SW Completed Transportation 2022 Guardrail Program Com leted Transportation 2022 Traffic Signal Upgrades Completed Transportation Citywide Pedestrian Enhancements Project Com leted Water 2022 Waterline Overlays Completed Water Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment Completed Storm Green Street & Rain Gardens Completed Storm 2022 Stormwater Overlays Completed Storm Phase 3 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2022 Completed Sewer 2022 Stormwater Overlays Completed Sewer Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 4 WWTP WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-house Projects WWTP Carbon Recovery Project I lCompleted WWTP City Park Odor Scrubber I lCompleted a_ U a U- U 00 N O N M N O N d N O IZ O L a. O c O r r c m m L a a- U- U d U N Y L O 3.1 w N O N M N O N C d E t V a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 134 Packet Pg. 207 7.A.b UP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023) PROJECTS REVISED Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Transportation Annual Street Preservation Program 2025 cost revised from $1,386,0000 to $1,500,000 Transportation 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. Addition of $15,000 construction cost to 2023 Transportation Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades Cost and funding moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St. SW Cost and funding moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades Cost and funding moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028 Transportation 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W Corridor Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2027 to 2026-2028 Transportation Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 Addition of $2,646,000 construction cost to 2023 Transportation Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 3 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2026 to 2023-2027 Transportation Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 4 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2027 to 2023-2028 Transportation SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved form 2025-2027 to 2026-2028 Transportation Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW - Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2025 to 2023-2026 Transportation SR-104 Adaptive System - 236th to 226th Cost and funding revised for 2023 and 2025 Transportation SR-104 @100th Ave W. Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements 2025-2026 cost and funding removed, $3,231,000 cost and funding added to 2029-2043 Transportation 175th St SW Slope Repair 2023 construction cost moved to 2026 Transportation 232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-104 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028 Transportation 236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W 2026 and 2027 cost and funding revised Transportation 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW 2026 and 2027 cost and funding revised Transportation 80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2027 to 2026-2028 Transportation 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation 218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028 Transportation Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave S Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025 to 2026 Transportation 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025 to 2026 Transportation Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022 to 2023 Transportation Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2027 to 2026-2028 Transportation 95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation Railroad St. Walkway from Dayton St. to Main St. / SR-104 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027 Transportation SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Trans Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2042 to 2026-2028 Transportation Downtown Lighting Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2028 Transportation SR-104 Walkway: HAWK to Pine / Pine from SR-104 to 9th Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2027 to 2026-2028 Transportation Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2042 to 2023 Transportation Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St. Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025 to 2026 Transportation Transportation Plan Update 2023 cost and funding changed from $185,000 to $170,000 a_ U a LL U 00 N O N M N O N m N O M O L a w O c O c m m a` a LL U d V N Y O 3.1 a 00 N O N A N O N c m E t to a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 135 Packet Pg. 208 7.A.b UP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023) PROJECTS REVISED Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Storm Edmonds Marsh Water Quaility Improvements Funding redistributed to include ARPA Funds Storm Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Phase 1 Cost and funding extended to 2025 and 2026, ARPA Funds included Storm Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design Phase 2023 cost and funding moved to 2024 Storm Ballinger Regional Facility Construction Phase Cost revised from $6M to $3M, and moved from 2024 to 2025 Storm Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan Cost revised from $300,000 to $600,000, and moved from 2022 to 2023 Sewer Phase 9 Annual Sewer Repl/Improvements (2022) $30,000 cost and funding added to 2023 Sewer Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Sewer Lake Ballinger Sewer Cost and funding shifted from 2023-204 to 2024-2025 WWTP Nutrient Removal Project 2024 cost and funding removed; 2023 cost and funding revised to $300,000 Facilities Boys and Girls Club Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Cemetery Building Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities City Hall Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Frances Anderson Center Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Fire Station 16 Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Fire Station 17 Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Fire Station 20 Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Fire Life Safety Communications Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Historic Log Cabin Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Historical Museum Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Library Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Meadowdale Club House Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Old Public Works Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Parks Maintenance Building Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Public Safety Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Public Works O&M Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Wade James Theater Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised Facilities Yost Pool House I Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised a_ U a u_ U 00 N O N M N O N m N O M O L a w O c O r c m m a` a u_ U d V N Y O v a 00 N O N A N O N C d E t V a 2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.3 136 Packet Pg. 209 8.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2022 Tree Code Amendments AMD2022-0004 Staff Lead: Deb Powers Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Deb Powers Background/History Edmonds' tree code, Chapter 23.10 ECDC<https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/> primarily focuses on tree retention related to development. During its adoption last year, the City Council and the Planning Board directed staff to further amend the code to limit property owner tree removals under a second phase of tree code amendments. Note that new code requirements resulting in significant changes to procedures or additional cost to permit applicants are 'Major' code amendments. The City Council and Planning Board provided general feedback for improvements to the current tree code and confirmed the project scope at the June 21 and July 13 meetings, respectively. Staff was directed to expand the scope of "Phase 2" tree code amendments to consider minor changes to the existing code that: Clarify, simplify, and provide greater code consistency. Streamline the development review or tree removal process. Align with industry standards. Address situations that have required a code interpretation, when the code is difficult or unclear in its application, or as trends in code enforcement merit code clarification. Staff developed an initial list of preliminary tree code amendments that follows this scope and general direction. At the September 14 Planning Board meeting, the Board provided feedback on preliminary code amendments #1-11, indicating a few clarifications were needed but that overall, the preliminary code changes would achieve the scope and direction of the Phase 2 tree code amendments. The Planning board raised one Major code amendment consideration that has been added to the Major code amendment list, to be discussed later. The list has been revised (Attachment 1) to show proposed code changes grouped by three primary code amendment classifications, according to the impact of code modifications: Minor - amendments do not change the meaning of the code. They clarify/simplify or further define something already in the code, address redundancies, address typos or result in simple reformatting or removal of outdated references, including industry standards, Best Management Practices, etc. without resulting in increased requirements. Moderate - amendments are relatively uncontroversial restructuring of code sections, and any of the above Minor amendments that result in new, increased or eliminated requirements. Major - amendments add a substantial prohibition/ban on something currently allowed or add substantial new requirements. This category would include any amendments that result in significant changes to existing procedures or significant additional cost to permit applicants, and/or change the intent of the code. Staff is expecting that several additional code amendments will be identified at subsequent Planning Packet Pg. 210 8.A Board, Tree Board, City Council, and stakeholder meetings and from public feedback. Staff Recommendation Confirm that the remaining preliminary 'Minor' code amendments to Chapter 23.10 ECDC, #12-19 are appropriate in achieving the scope and direction of the Phase 2 tree code amendments. Narrative Urban Forest Planner Deb Powers will give a presentation on the remaining preliminary Minor code amendments #12-19, shown in orange in Attachment 1. Some of these amendments may be further defined, reformatted, or involve additional requirements as Moderate or Major code amendments. These are shown with an asterisk and yellow highlighting. Staff is seeking confirmation from the Planning Board that the general direction and sample code language for #12-19 is appropriate, prior to addressing the related Moderate and Major code amendments. Next Steps At the October 12 Planning Board meeting, staff would appreciate feedback on the following: Staff acknowledges the Minor tree code amendments may need additional refinement. Does the Planning Board agree with the general direction of the remaining preliminary Minor tree code updates? Is the Planning Board ready to review and discuss preliminary Moderate and Major code amendments, moving forward? Should the focus of the next joint meeting with Tree Board (proposed Nov 30 Special Meeting date) be a discussion and consensus on the Minor code amendments and moving forward with more complex Moderate and Major code changes? Attachments: Minor Tree Code Amend List Packet PB Meeting PPT 10122022 Packet Pg. 211 ATTACHMENT 1 PRELIMINARY Minor Tree Code Amendment List Revised 1016122 8.A.a Applies to # POLICY IMPACT ECDC 23.10... CURRENT CODE SAMPLE CODE REWRITE ISSUE/SOLUTION Development or Property Owner? de a�„ dse def„ti„e , Hazard tree damagedOF - c sed Str„Gt„rau„ determined bya qualified tree prof ssi„a tree/tree part with an Extreme or High overall risk rating using the most current version of the ISA Tree Risk Issue: Current definition results in code interpretation issues, Hazard tree -dead, dying, diseased, damaged, or Assessment Qualification (TRAQ) method, with the following: prolonged development review times and problems with code p 1 Minor 020.Fi structurally defective as determined by a qualified tree 1. A combination of structural defects and/or disease that makes it subject enforcement. Both professional to a high probability failure; 2. In proximity to moderate to high -frequency use targets, persons or property, and Solution: Replace with industry standard. 3. The hazard condition cannot be reduced with reasonable and proper arboricultural practices, nor can the target be moved. L s n-.f disturbanre _ the houndaFy hefiA,een the area, of minimum nroteotion Issue: Current definition is unclear and does not specifically tree apd- the- al/0- .,hie site gist„rhan a Limits of disturbance - the boundary between the area of Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) - a defined area as determined by a qualified reference tree protection fence. Often confused with other 2 Minor 020.E minimum protection around a tree and the allowable site professional applicable to tree trunks, roots, and soil. TPZ is measured in limits of disturbance on site plans, ultimately resulting in Development disturbance. feet from the face of the trunk to its outer boundary, where tree protection retained tree damage. fence is located. May be determined using critical root zone formula, dripline, air spade excavations and is variable depending on species, age and health Solution: Replace with industry standard. of the tree, soil conditions and existing infrastructure. Nuisance tree ...is causing significant physical damage that is obvious in a Issue: The term "significant" is vague and the definition does Nuisance tree - is causing significant physical damage to a photograph to a private or public structure and/or infrastructure, including but not include remediation. private or public structure and/or infrastructure, including but not limited to: sidewalk, curb, road, water or sewer or stormwater utilities, 3 Minor 020.N not limited to sidewalk, curb, road, water or sewer or driveway, parking lot, building foundation, or roof. The problems associated Solution: Include corrective actions that may prevent whole Property Owner stormwater utilities, driveway, parking lot, building with a nuisance tree must be such that they cannot be corrected by tree removal. Allow a streamlined review process for situations foundation, or roof reasonable practices, including, but not limited to branch or root pruning, that clearly don't need an arborist's expertise. bracing, or cabling. Qualified professional ...[has] relevant education and Qualified professional ...[has] relevant education and training in arboriculture or urban forestry, having 2 or more of the following credentials (or Issue: Incomplete list of professional credentials, does not training in arboriculture or urban forestry, having 2 or more equivalent): consider other qualifications. 4 Minor 020.Q of the following credentials: 1. ISA Certified Arborist Both 1. ISA Certified Arborist 2-4. Additional professional standards (TRAQ, ASCA, SAF) 2-4. Additional professional standards (TRAQ, ASCA, SAF) Solution: add BCMA credential and "or equivalent." 5. Board Certified Master Arborist ...activities [that] are exempt from the provisions of this [x]. Emergency Tree Removal. Any tree that requires City approval for Issue: Lack of emergency tree removal provisions that apply to chapter and do not require a permit [include tree removal] by removal may be removed by the property owner if it is determined to pose an property owners, outside of critical areas. 5 Minor 040.0 the City and/or utility ...in response to situations involving imminent threat or danger to public health and safety, public or private Property danger to life or property, substantial fire hazards, or property, or of serious environmental degradation; provided, that within 14 Solution: Move applicable text from 23.40.22.C.8.b.vi to Owner interruption of services provided by a utility. days, the property owner notifies the City and demonstrates compliance with 23.10.040. the provisions of this title. 030.0 - Tree removal associated with [certain permit types] Issue/Solution: Any development types or "other land use Minor ..or other land use approval ... Examples: approval" referenced under 23.10.030.0 that may be required 6 "Major? 030.C, 060.A 060.A ...the city requires approval of a tree retention and [x]. Specific "other land use approval" to submit a tree retention plan should be listed under Development protection plan in conjunction with ... any tree removal on [x]....related demolition, clearing and grading permits... 23.10.060.A. developed sites not exempted by ECDC 23.10.040... 'POLICY IMPACT Minor - Amendments that in no way change the meaning of the current code. They clarify/simplify or further define something already in the code, address typos and redundancies, and/or result in simple reformatting or removal of outdated references, including industry standards, Best Available Science, Best Management Practices, etc. that do not result in changes to code intent or an increase in requirements. Moderate - Relatively uncontroversial restructuring of code sections, and any amendments above that result in new, increased or eliminated requirements without additional cost to permit applicants or procedural changes that require additional resources. Major - Adds extensive new requirements or substantially prohibits/bans something currently allowed; amendments resulting in significant changes to procedures or significant additional cost to permit applicants, and/or change the intent of the code. Packet Pg. 212 ATTACHMENT 1 PRELIMINARY Minor Tree Code Amendment List Revised 1016122 8.A.a Applies to # POLICY IMPACT ECDC 23.10... CURRENT CODE SAMPLE CODE REWRITE ISSUE/SOLUTION Development or Property Owner? *If tree retention is desired with any other development types (Office, Mixed Use, Commercial, etc.), add to Major code amendments for consideration. Issue: Code interpretation issues: some applicants feel dead 060. C: 30% [retention is required] of all significant trees... trees >6" DBH should count towards meeting tree retention 060.0 060.C: 30% [retention is required] of all c gnifGanTtf viable trees... thresholds if the code does not specify "viable." Minor 060.F.3, G. If a development retains 50% of the significant trees on a 7 *Moderate? 060.G, site, fee -in -lieu provisions... do not apply G. Tree Retention Incentive. If a development retains 50% of the giant Solution: Replace "significant" with "viable" where needed. Development 080.B.1, etc. 080.B.1 No tree replacement is required ...if the tree is viable trees on a site, the fee -in -lieu provisions... do not apply *Consider defining tree condition applicable to trees retained hazardous, dead, diseased, injured, etc. with development, based on industry standards. Add to Moderate code amendments if under consideration. 060.B.2.b.iv iv. [Show] location of tree protection measure v fence at the proposed TPZs, Issue: Various terminology is confusing to applicants, resulting iv. [Show] location of tree protection measures... with distances from the face of trunks to fence noted on the site plan, -�- in tree protection fence locations incorrectly shown on 8 Minor 060.B.2.b.v, v. Indicate limits of disturbance drawn to scale around all I ,�:^,+o lifnif-s of drsf,.rha^^e drawn to scale around all trees impacted by site proposals and/or inadequate on -site tree protection. Development 060.6.2.c.ii, trees impacted by site disturbances resulting from grading, disturbances resulting from grading, demolition, or construction activities. Silt 060.B.2.c.iii demolition, or construction activities. fence per TESC requirements may satisfy tree protection fence requirements Solution: Use "TPZ" industry standard. Clarify that silt fence etc. if TPZs are observed. may be allowed if TPZs are observed. Issue: Available incentives to retain trees on development sites are not prominent enough in the code. Applicants G. If a development retains 50% of the significant trees on a G. Tree Retention Incentive. If a development retains at least 50% of the interpret the 50% retention incentive as a "cap" versus striving 9 Minor 060.G site, the fee -in -lieu provisions of ECDC 23.10.080(E) do not signifiGant viable trees on a site, the fee -in -lieu provisions of ECDC for greater than 50% retention rates. Development apply. 23.10.080(E) do not apply. Solution: Clearly identify tree retention incentives, add "at least" to numerical thresholds. ...After providing clear documentation to deveWment sep4Ges the City that Issue: Inconsistent terminology. The appraisal requirement all replacement options have been considered... the developer applicant does not reflect the development review process and presents Permit applicant and City/staff references throughout ECDC shall pay a fee -in -lieu for each replacement tree ... [that] ... shall be deposited a conflict of interest as shown. 10 Minor 080.E, etc. 23.10. into the c-City's Ttree Ffund....For each significant tree greater than 24" DBH - Solution: Replace "developer" with "applicant." Replace "City," Development removed, a fee based on an appraisal of the tree value by the t=tree "Director," "development services," "Planning Official," "city p g Y protection pFofessiona applicant's arborist^ 4 F& FGte, gon ,,- f &&;Gp-a4 shall be required... tree protection professional," etc. with appropriate terms consistent with Chapter. ...After providing clear documentation ... that all replacement ...After providing clear documentation, which may include the applicant's Issue: current code is unclear that an arborist report, although 11 Minor 080.E options have been considered and are infeasible, including arborist recommendations ...that all replacement options have been not required, may be needed to document infeasibility. arborist reports as necessary... considered... i„^adrPg "beAst FepeFts as „eGe sarr "" Solution: Clarify. Issue: Current text has resulted in code interpretation issues Viable tree - significant tree that a qualified professional has ,Viable tree" - significant tree that a qualified professional has determined to and the practice of "downgrading" tree condition in arborist Minor determined to be in good health, with a low risk of failure be in good health, with a low risk of failure due to structural defects, is reports and tree inventories to avoid tree replacement and/or 12 * 020.X due to structural defects, is windfirm if isolated or remains as rove a windfirm if isolated or remains as art of and is a species that is p g p fees in lieu. Development Moderate? part of a grove and is a species that is suitable for its suitable for its location, subject to City review/approval. location. Some applicants are unfamiliar with the development review process: submitted proposals are subject to City review to 'POLICY IMPACT Minor - Amendments that in no way change the meaning of the current code. They clarify/simplify or further define something already in the code, address typos and redundancies, and/or result in simple reformatting or removal of outdated references, including industry standards, Best Available Science, Best Management Practices, etc. that do not result in changes to code intent or an increase in requirements. Moderate - Relatively uncontroversial restructuring of code sections, and any amendments above that result in new, increased or eliminated requirements without additional cost to permit applicants or procedural changes that require additional resources. Major - Adds extensive new requirements or substantially prohibits/bans something currently allowed; amendments resulting in significant changes to procedures or significant additional cost to permit applicants, and/or change the intent of the code. Packet Pg. 213 ATTACHMENT 1 PRELIMINARY Minor Tree Code Amendment List Revised 1016122 8.A.a Applies to # POLICY IMPACT ECDC 23.10... CURRENT CODE SAMPLE CODE REWRITE ISSUE/SOLUTION Development or Property Owner? provide permit determinations (approval, approved with conditions, denied, etc.) Solution: add "subject to review" *Consider defining tree condition applicable to trees retained with development, based on industry standards. Add to Moderate code amendments if under consideration. 030.8 - Tree removal not specifically exempted will be processed as a Type I permit... 23.10.040.F: ... trees that do not meet the exemptions... may Issue: "Exceptions to exemptions" and other double negatives be removed... are confusing, reduce code compliance rates, and complicate the tree removal permit application and review process. A permit is required for [list] Omission of clear code requirements has resulted in code 23.10.040... activities exempt from the provisions of this 0 Non -hazardous tree removal in critical areas interpretation issues. Minor chapter [that] do not require a permit... except for... 0 Tree removal on commercial and multi -family properties Solution: Clarify when a Type 1 permit or Landscape 13 *Moderate? 030-060 Tree removal on vacant lots and/or subdividable properties Modification is required, the condition or criteria for tree Both 23.10.050.A: Removal of protected trees is prohibited, removal in critical areas, vacant lots, subdividable properties, except as provided for in... Tree Removal Allowances etc. Tie into 030 for consistency. Add examples in code? [List what is allowed] 23.10.050.8 ...removal of trees... is prohibited except as *Consider restructuring code to replace "exemptions" with provided for in... "allowances" to define what IS allowed, versus what's NOT. 23.10.060.A.5 ...the city requires approval of a tree retention Add to Moderate code amendments if under consideration. plan in conjunction with... for... any tree removal on developed sites not exempted by... Issue: Terminology and identification of priorities, incentives and variations to development standards is not prominent inthe Specific tree retention and protection plan review standards code. 14 Minor 060.A, last provided in this section establish tree retention priorities, Reformat and label priorities, incentives, and variations to development Development sentence incentives, and variations to development standards ... to standards. Solution: Clearly distinguish code priorities, incentives, and facilitate preservation of viable trees... variations to development standards. Use consistent/uniform terms (example: Conservation Subdivision). Issue: Allowing tree removal over multiple development Short [plat]/Subdivision Phased Review. phases typically results in lower successful tree retention i. If during the short [plat] or subdivision review process the versus and gives the public the initial perception of greater location of all proposed improvements... have not yet been tree retention. Costs for tree removal under phased 060.B.3.a, established, the applicant may submit a tree retention [plan] Reference ECDC 20.75.048, the Tree Conservation Subdivision Design development is greater. 15 Minor 0605.2 that addresses the current phase of development and limits incentive more prominently in 23.10.060.F.2 or consider moving into 23.10. Development removal to the impacted areas... A new tree retention and Solution: Increase successful tree retention on development protection plan shall be required at each subsequent phase of the project as more information about the location of the sites by planning early in the short plat/subdivision design. proposed improvements is known.... Disincentivize phased review by allowing tree removals to occur at one time. 'POLICY IMPACT Minor - Amendments that in no way change the meaning of the current code. They clarify/simplify or further define something already in the code, address typos and redundancies, and/or result in simple reformatting or removal of outdated references, including industry standards, Best Available Science, Best Management Practices, etc. that do not result in changes to code intent or an increase in requirements. Moderate - Relatively uncontroversial restructuring of code sections, and any amendments above that result in new, increased or eliminated requirements without additional cost to permit applicants or procedural changes that require additional resources. Major - Adds extensive new requirements or substantially prohibits/bans something currently allowed; amendments resulting in significant changes to procedures or significant additional cost to permit applicants, and/or change the intent of the code. Packet Pg. 214 8.A.a ATTACHMENT 1 PRELIMINARY Minor Tree Code Amendment List Revised 1016122 Applies to # POLICY ECDC CURRENT CODE SAMPLE CODE REWRITE ISSUE/SOLUTION Development IMPACT 23.10... or Property Owner? If there are not enough existing trees... to satisfy [the 30% If there are not enough existing trees... to satisfy [the 30% retention retention threshold], the applicant shall be required to make threshold], the applicant shall be required to make up the deficiency by 16 Minor 060.F.4.a-b up the deficiency by planting a number of new trees planting a number of new trees nor 2310090 that would be sufficient, in per 23.10.080 that would be sufficient, in combination with combination with the number of trees actually retained, to satisfy [the 30% the number of trees actually retained, to satisfy [the 30 / tree retention threshold] ... tree retention threshold] ... ...Tree replacement is required for tree cutting permits ...and/or for tree removal associated with development... Each significant tree to be removed shall be replaced as follows: 1. For each significant tree between six inches and 10 Minor inches DBH removed, one replacement tree is required. *Major. 17 080.A.1-3 2 For each significant tree between 10.1 inches and 14 ? inches in DBH removed, two replacement trees are required. 3. For each significant tree greater than 14 inches and less the 24 inches in DBH removed, three replacement trees are required After providing clear documentation ...that all replacement options have been considered and are infeasible... the 18 Minor 080.E [applicant] shall pay a fee -in -lieu for each replacement tree required but not replaced [in] the amount of ... $1,000 multiplied by the number of trees necessary to satisfy the tree replacement requirements of this section... 19 1 Minor 1080.E, et al I ...shall be deposited into the city's tree fund. Tree replacement is required for tree cutting permits ...and/or for tree removal associated with development... Each SigPffiGant viable tree to be removed shall be replaced as follows: Removed Tree Size Required Replacements 6-10" DBH 1 10.1-14"DBH 2 14.1 — 24" DBH 3 Issue: 23.10.080 refers to replacements by the size (DBH) of tree removals, which is confusing and has caused code interpretation issues. Solution: Clarify so that achieving the required number of trees relates to meeting the 30% retention threshold. Issue: Numerical requirements presented in a narrative format appear complicated. By not specifying "viable," some confusion has resulted over whether dead trees are required to be replaced. Solution: Reformat to chart form, add "viable." *Consider adjusting range of tree sizes to include 24" DBH tree removal replacements by planting 3 or more trees. Add to Major code amendments if under consideration. Issue: "of this section" implies the that the number of replacement trees is based on the size of removed trees per ECDC 23.10.080. However, the intent of the $1,000 per tree Reformat ECDC 23.10.060 and 080 to provide fee in lieu requirements in fee in lieu relates to the number of trees required to meet the sequence, according to retention, replanting and payment priorities. 30% tree retention threshold per ECDC 23.10.060.C. ..deposited into the City's Tree Fund per ECDC 3.95. Solution: Reformat — see left Issue: ECDC 3.95 (Tree Fund) is not cross-referenced throughout 23.10 Solution: update reference throughout Chapter Issue: Current code does not consider a broad diversity of users. Greater code clarity leads to higher levels of compliance and streamlined review times. Development Development Both Both 20 Moderate All General code -writing approach, code organization & Solution: Reorganize disparate sections, use charts in place of Both formatting narrative code language where appropriate, use "allowance" instead of "exemptions," shall instead of must, and replace "Director may" and other subjective language with intended code provision. Issue: various terminology is confusing. 020.D, "Developable site" definition, trees within the required yard 21 Moderate 060.D.2.b, setbacks or around the perimeter, existing trees outside of Solution: Revise definition/language for consistency Development 0605.4 the improved areas ... non -developable areas... throughout Chapter, consider prioritizing tree retention by location (outside the building envelope or within setbacks). 'POLICY IMPACT Minor - Amendments that in no way change the meaning of the current code. They clarify/simplify or further define something already in the code, address typos and redundancies, and/or result in simple reformatting or removal of outdated references, including industry standards, Best Available Science, Best Management Practices, etc. that do not result in changes to code intent or an increase in requirements. Moderate - Relatively uncontroversial restructuring of code sections, and any amendments above that result in new, increased or eliminated requirements without additional cost to permit applicants or procedural changes that require additional resources. Major - Adds extensive new requirements or substantially prohibits/bans something currently allowed; amendments resulting in significant changes to procedures or significant additional cost to permit applicants, and/or change the intent of the code. Packet Pg. 215 ATTACHMENT 1 PRELIMINARY Minor Tree Code Amendment List Revised 1016122 8.A.a Applies to # POLICY ECDC CURRENT CODE SAMPLE CODE REWRITE ISSUE/SOLUTION Development IMPACT 23.10... or Property Owner? 'POLICY IMPACT Minor - Amendments that in no way change the meaning of the current code. They clarify/simplify or further define something already in the code, address typos and redundancies, and/or result in simple reformatting or removal of outdated references, including industry standards, Best Available Science, Best Management Practices, etc. that do not result in changes to code intent or an increase in requirements. Moderate - Relatively uncontroversial restructuring of code sections, and any amendments above that result in new, increased or eliminated requirements without additional cost to permit applicants or procedural changes that require additional resources. Major - Adds extensive new requirements or substantially prohibits/bans something currently allowed; amendments resulting in significant changes to procedures or significant additional cost to permit applicants, and/or change the intent of the code. Packet Pg. 216 v M44,k .� �• . i yt+ \ + h f`. ♦ . ,�I, � �. ;,��•• as .�`. •`•. '�+ J . 11 1 11 1 m a 1I V t .,• "� �1 ��;.� ,ray'♦ �• `a •'� � � y' Y ,,s , �• } � Ir �' �M 1i+�'.'J► 1� :ate �• 1- �• -, � .. . is • +.•k . � , .� yr• Tonight's Focus Remaining Minor tree code amendments Related Moderate code amendments Next steps Veb Powers, Urban Forest, eb. powers@edmo Swd, ;.p r ' J 4 �4y 1 , � 1:4 7 i 3 T. 0 0 N N O N 0 a N a+ C d E E CD O L N N O N N O F- a a a� c m CD m a m V a s w a Packet Pg. 218 Project Scope Phase 11 Tree Code Amendments 1. Limit property owner tree removal (Major) 2. Consider Minor amendments to current code that: • Simplify • Align with industry standards/BMPs • Streamline review process • Address code interpretation issues 8.A.b E Packet Pg. 219 1 �P rncip 'sF .`•`'� fir. v. '�'-$i .1 • S If Fjv `rL 1 ♦.yam J"\ �.�� • 8.A.b I Minor Tree Code Amendments Applies to oeveroprnenf °rPropertY S Revised fS fOiG.?2 Ue/SOLUDON �0 refers to r At t e is� �ng °d has fhcaushe (pgtil of ac v so fhar.._, . sed °Ode Q the fete requir `rest+Wd namberof A7ava ent rt requtr��._ trees ropm res aover notWh ith-rtl �ar�^sane va f°rmat mat to than fo are equired Development sting range rm"add'viable,^ P menis�SUyp/ahn83arrnctude24^D �+2v°Pment By r�Onstderahon, trees. Add to o °wevet m the size nu berot m to t�rOsh°td PerF DC 23M0p8�0tMe ee Fund) /s not °tpss-refere tce throughout Ocetl sty leads fsider b og r Both red review U+ves,rievel.t rsitY of eve mentafion a9urred"".- ant s amonsA " vatue by the 24 oeH st as shown, few Process an ant a dispar arborisf reponsaes °Onsideredand are j that allroplacemant aKy_ireB Solution: Re d presents age ate sections °ns, Manor Viabl rrecessary""_ nfeasfbte, including er r r �v r eckar documental bee Pr tec Director � de ekPmenttservi aPPlicant.'Re 1thersub. msteadof to use nplace With " a//' Pna Use ns j % t2 o2o.X deknrimeyto be fn nt hee that a qua!' cOftardemd.." ntlat{ons ...that al ah h mayinc/utle the apotica Consistent wttnh Chapter�nal, ^ eces�,ith aAPro9 offic at —city 'City' ^ ��t�ment eve languaas,rid ra �jacenCe" sign hca 'Moderate? due to strut goodhealth, medArofession mant pfkns have nt's Issue: current Pnate terms ally is °°nf intended clear rmn grove entlis atspeckrs m m ated orremains as be in �- Slgn/ficant tree s not Solurequired, trey be gee ed t that ar f asib although M ernguage o Dori sisten uitade fonts 4nr sdateCw sk of due P fa °sat has r rminad to arM the nCo of result code inf asibitily, uUarrrg envelizngI ;seen by locatioq Aarf oya udufat del Pratt' ed in Crt1'reviewJapprova{ a SAecks that is teee s st end bee Invent rt4 tree condtfrP'on n a iss t S u avo d tree replacemenrtarndlcr rocessPs�ibmitt are miller with Dei�-19 merit P unfa ed WOAOsais are subject M pf . _ nt revteH, ENT CURRRE�tMtN to {ft COpE AR CkMENT t Mhror rda/�earenote YMrnorTre oso.F.a.a-b up the thresh°{dl ffih exrng tra eCode Rrrte Per the umf0 Bno byplan�{aantsya!{,p��ah�Ylthe 90^ `SAMP ndment list #POLIC PI-ly ECI,� PR ber wou 2umLgrof e4uiredto /o LE CO EL1M1N {d suffrci new fMPACP 23.78.,, ARYMinor ent trees make /fryrereale OEREWR! CURRENT CODE Tree Code amendment List rh esydd� re °trghe '�{ g xi tree$ to sa SAMPLE COp — E REWRITE Revised 10Ri/22 7 A41nor Bseo a 060aIrefenhonisregdlradJofaltsigntic ISSUEJSOLU•DON 11611 G, G' !f vel ant trees... 'If tree retention is 'Moderate? 080.9. t, site, fee_lndtePument retains 50% fCif+ce, Mi desired with etc. Provisions...do not app/Y ant trees one 060.C: 30% amend, eon -ats i Use' Commercyal-Pother do IS 080B. f No tree rePtea nJur lfthe tree is via Retentrof n lrircen ru{rodf ofah trees."" Issue: DB n censitleratron_ '' applicants� to ry}alm. ced�'Pes hazardous G Tree erAretatto dead, dis required .., secant viable trees >6" eU, etc ble tees on a llve. Ifa develo threshold ff th n iouldssues' so ceo.B.2.b.ty site, the fee_ln-lku Pmentretafns 50% of B Minor 060, `V IShow Aroree visions. the signilloant SOlut(on: Re t e e not' ate retention co lnt towards does of speot ve06 feel dead 62-by. v Ind" il. Aon oft " 060.6.2:Kate limits ofdlsiu�r Prokcfion me Y P BBo.B.2.c.i7i frees " asures... n' IShow)locaN an With abt en r do not aPPI demoliti;I; eelby site disf 'rt a d with dlstW1fir °n ofh 'COnside+ defining eneeded. constnrctlo »ces esulting ro round al/ ces frdtrt the %' A i ih horr V.,M deve o ce "s" nific (sing tree iron n aclivihes. m grad/rill, offrunks to knee at t Moderate Ptnent, based on w h "vi da re e''Nn re _ ntOn aPPlioableS. ustry t to fe pa sCsu4ngerom gradi toHiornot�a{ 17 t e Sm MaPZs, in tr e: Van terminolments (t under corns y� Add f trees tamed on 9 Mirror G /f rf re g de fees " ion nBo.G � �h fee�r� U p�ovsrtons� ECOC23. Do g t trees on a G Try am observed mend they satisfy tree protecyron fcencen a u eSh �� tUand/or Inadequate on I °Drrecite beptlry Se�n t roSOitG(g Soluti 0(E) do notes. ee Rteknfion lncenhv may be all se "TPZ" industry sta n. viable tr e. If a development owed 23 f0.OBp Pmentrefains of k Issue: Avatta d �Zs are observed t ce P ent n aid. Clla ' veto (F7 do ces on a site, served. nTy that Silt fen m I aPAty the fee-trr,fku prowskns f Sp% ofthe saes are not ro rncentfves to retatn tr to Minor ofECDC Interpret the 5p^ojamrtetentinent enough in the e q veloPment oao.E, etc. 23a oft appticam and CitYlstaB references a{�Rer greater than 5p % ret ntive as a ace p�+cents Arovrding dear Solution' entlon rates, P. versus striving noes throughout ECpC shall a laa_jentoptions ha eme s,,, t . least°%. Cteany identify t Into the ee'in-lkutor each rye n considered...the the Cr t numerical ihreshtre retention ince Development re _7tr10 Pfaceme ty that slue: to ntives, add at s t t rrrOVeq a fee based a ...For each sign�_1thatJ.. applicant doebeds not rceeryect the stent termtnokgy The a Mirror ...ARer a ant free Aosit a con deve! PPrai ao'F optionsvrding clear docu shelf bee lit PPraisal ofthe tree greater than ad flirt of intere OPment rev' sat requirem Both Developmm IIt Packet Pg. 221 Led] Oki Are. Vo 0.1 8.A.b oderate Code Discussion mendments Packet Pg. 223 Next Steps Moderate &Major Code Amendments (6+) Minor Code Amendments (14) Moderate Major Tree Board Code Amendments Code Amendments Monthly Meetings (18+) (con't) ------------------1I ---- ------------ Project Scoping No Impact Code Amendments (11) Public Engagement Planning Board/ Tree Board Recommendations to City Council No Impact/Minor Code Amendments Planning Board (25) Public Hearing City Council Check -in and/or Adopt Minor Code Amendments? 8.A.b Final Code Adoption 3rd Q 2023? City Council Public Hearing E Packet Pg. 224 1 Questions? y 'r Ap- Veb Powers, Urban Forest, eb. powers@edmo Swd, O O 0 N N O N 0 a N a+ C d E C d E Q d O t� d d L N N O N N O F- a a a� c m CD m a .. m V a s w a Packet Pg. 225 Mock Development Scenarios bEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 1 10,000 square foot lot, 10 healthy trees >24" DBH. Can only retain 5 trees. How many trees are required to be planted? Are fees in lieu required? DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 2 10,000 square foot lot, 10 healthy trees >24" DBH. Can only retain 3 trees. How many trees are required to be planted? Are fees in lieu required? 8.A.b CD O N N O N Q N r C N E C d E Q N O U N N L N N O N N O r t— Cf C N N m a a� U a s= a� E z U 2 r Q Packet Pg. 226 Mock Development Scenarios DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 3 16,000 square foot lot, 10 healthy trees: 5 are 12" DBH, 5 are >30" DBH. Retaining one of each size. How many trees are required to be planted? , Are fees in lieu required? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I � I DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 4 ► 16,000 square foot lot in RS-8 zone, subdivided into a 2-lot short plat 10 healthy trees: 5 are 12" DBH, 5 are >30" DBH How many trees are required to be planted? Are fees in lieu required? 8.A.b Packet Pg. 227 9.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2022 Extended Agenda Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Kernen Lien Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review Extended Agenda Narrative Extended Agenda attached. Attachments: 10.07.2022 Extended Agenda Packet Pg. 228 �y oV EQAf 6 l $90 October 2022 IPUMNM o CARD Extended Agenda October 7, 2022 9.A.a Items and Dates are subject to change October 26 1. CIP/CFP Public Hearing 2. Comprehensive Plan Update 3. Civic Park Rules 4. Code Modernization Process and Updates to Chapter 20.80 ECDC November 2022 Nov 9 1. Civic Park Rules 2. Wireless Update — Work Session 3. Tree Code Update Nov 23 1. No Meeting - Day before Thanksgiving Nov 30 1. Code Modernization Process and Updates to Chapter 20.80 ECDC Public Hearing 2. Tree Board Joint Hearing December 2022 Dec 14 1. Election of Officers 2. Tree Code Update January LULS Jan 11 1. Jan 25 1. Comprehensive Plan Update r Q Packet Pg. 229 items ana vates are sui 9.A.a o change Pending 1. Implementation / code updates concerning trees and the UFMP For Future 2 Climate Action Plan update and public outreach Consideration 2022 3. Housing policies and implementation (incl Multifamily Design) 4. Comprehensive Plan update preparation and gap analysis 5. Subdivision code updates 6. Community Development Code Amendments / Re -Organization 7. Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation (esp. 5 Corners) 8. Low impact / stormwater code review and updates 9. Sustainable development code(s) review and updates 10. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including: a. Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development strategies b. Parking standards 11. ADA Transition Plan (Parks) 12. CIP/CFP Recurring 1. Election of Officers (1St meeting in December) Topics 2. Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department Reports & Updates- First meeting after previous quarter (4/13, 7/13, 10/12, 1/11/23) 3. Joint meeting with City Council —April or as needed 4. Development Activity Report r Q Packet Pg. 230