2022-10-26 Planning Board PacketPlanning Board
Remote Zoom Meeting
Agenda
121 5th Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
www.edmondswa.gov
Michelle Martin
425-771-0220
Wednesday, October 26, 2022 7:00 PM Virtual Online Meeting
1.
2.
A.
Remote Meeting Information
Join Zoom Meeting: https://edmondswa-
gov.zoom.us/j/88526558062?pwd=YUtoNGFFQ210Q2U5SDdwRUFadX15dz09
Meeting ID: 885 2655 8062. Passcode: 598700
Call into the meeting by dialing: 253-215-8782
Phyiscal Location
The Planning Board members will be meeting remotely for this meeting and the public may as well at
the zoom information above. However, given the expiration of Gov. Inslee's proclamation on open
public meetings, a physical location to participate in the meeting must be provided. For this meeting
the physical location provide is Edmonds Waterfront Center Community Room B located at 220
Railroad Avenue.
Land Acknowledgement for Indigenous Peoples
We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their
successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken
care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their
sacred spiritual connection with the land and water.
Call to Order
Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived
Approval of Minutes
Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6935)
Approval of Minutes
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve draft minutes from the October 12th meeting.
Planning Board Page 1 Printed 1012112022
Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda October 26, 2022
ATTACHMENTS:
• PB221012 draft (PDF)
3. Announcement of Agenda
4. Audience Comments
5. Administrative Reports
6. Public Hearings
A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6940)
2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Public Hearing
Background/History
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at
least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital
improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in
order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth
Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects.
These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with
capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related
projects.
Staff Recommendation
Conduct Public Hearing for the 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement
Program
ATTACHMENTS:
• Parks CIP_CFP 2023-2028 (PDF)
• Public Works 2023-2028 CIP-CFP (PDF)
7. Unfinished Business
A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6937)
Comprehensive Plan Visioning Summary
Background/History
The City of Edmonds kicked of the community visioning process for the Comprehensive Plan update with
a six -week themed outreach over the summer. Over 8,500 comments were received via survey, email
and in person commentary throughout the process, which included a range of activities in different
areas throughout the City.
City staff and the PRR consultant team cataloged all comments and organized them into eight
overarching themes chosen for capability with the Comprehensive Plan elements. The overarching
themes are:
• Community Culture
Planning Board Page 2 Printed 1012112022
Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda October 26, 2022
• Urban Design
• Economic Development
• Housing
• Land Use
• Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
• Transportation
• Other (for comments that could not be reliably categorized)
In collaboration with PRR, City staff will draft community vision and value statements, informed by what
we heard through the visioning process. Finalizing a vision and value statement will be an iterative
process, with feedback from the community, Planning Board, and City Council. However, as the vision is
reviewed and refined, it will be important to stay consistent with the initial 8,500 comments to be held
accountable for the collective view and to remain inclusive and representative. The final statements will
guide development of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
• Edmonds Visions Survey Summary (PDF)
8. New Business
A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6920)
Development Code Update Work Plan
Background/History
This is a new item for the Planning Board. Staff introduced the topic to Council on September
27.
Staff Recommendation
Staff will present the proposed plan for the development code modernization work and discuss
a proposal for a minor change code amendment process.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Attachment 1 - Development code update slides 10.26.22 (PDF)
• Attachment 2 - PB draft ECDC 20.80 Text and Map Changes_minor amendment (PDF)
B. Motion to make a budget request to City Council to fund a communications system that supports
remote participation at in -person PB meetings.
9. Planning Board Extended Agenda
A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6938)
Planning Board Page 3 Printed 1012112022
Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda October 26, 2022
Extended Agenda
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review Extended Agenda
ATTACHMENTS:
• 10.20.2022 Extended Agenda (PDF)
10. Planning Board Chair Comments
11. Planning Board Member Comments
12. Adjournment
Planning Board Page 4 Printed 1012112022
2.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/26/2022
Approval of Minutes
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michelle Martin
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve draft minutes from the October 12th meeting.
Narrative
October 12th draft meeting minutes attached.
Attachments:
PB221012 draft
Packet Pg. 5
2.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Webinar Meeting
October 10, 2022
Chair Pence called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:04 p.m.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
Board Member Campbell read the Land Acknowledgement.
Board Members Present Staff Present
Roger Pence, Chair Kernen Lien, Planning Division Manager
Judi Gladstone, Vice Chair Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Director 'c
Mike Rosen Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Deputy Director
Beth Tragus-Campbell (alternate) Kyle Woods, Parks Planner & Capital Projects Manager °
Lily Distelhorst (student rep) Rob English, City Engineer c
Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director a
Board Members Absent Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner Q
Matt Cheung (excused) $
Todd Cloutier
Richard Kuehn (excused)
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
CAMPBELL, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 AND SEPTEMBER 28,
2022 AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED WITH VICE CHAIR GLADSTONE ABSTAINING.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
None.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department — Q3 Update
Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department Director Angie Feser gave the quarterly update.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 1 of 10
Packet Pg. 6
2.A.a
Administration/Park Planning Division:
• Transfer of Cultural Arts Division to Community Services & Economic Development Department
effective September 1.
• 2023 Budget Development — Staff has been busy with both Operating and Capital budgets.
• All Civic Park Memorial Benches/Tables have been adopted out and sold. This generated $66,000 to
go towards the park.
• Salmon Safe Certification draft went to Council.
• Yost Park Bridge(s)/Shell Creek Study Proposal (2023 budget) — There is a larger study to look at all
seven bridges and the trails that cross the streams.
• Library Flood / Plaza Room support - Displaced staff and materials from the library have been moved
to the Plaza Room which is normally rented out.
• Kyle Woods has started a park asset inventory project (in-house).
• Supported Special Events: Summer market, 4th of July, Taste Edmonds, Car Show, Safety Event,
Oktoberfest
Director Feser gave an update on Civic Park. It took a long time to build the base of the site. A lot of progress
is now starting to be visible. The sod is in for the playfields and the lawn area. The skate park has been done for
a while. The concrete path now winds throughout the site. There has been a lot of development on the inclusive
playground. The prefabricated restroom will be brought in next week. The stormwater mitigation on 96th °
Avenue right of way adjacent to Yost Park was approved for funding through ARPA ($450,000). The allocation c
for that was in Civic Park and has now been freed up to help with Civic Park. a
Q
Parks Maintenance: r_
• Aquatics — Yost Pool is in operation 7 days/week; the spray pad is now closed.
• Seasonal staff extension into the fall has been especially helpful since there were fewer individuals this
year.
• Supported special events — Uptown Market (6), Summer Market, 4th of July, Taste Edmonds, Car Show,
Safety Event, Oktoberfest
• New installation at 6th & Bell
• Highway 99 project plant inspections
• Bill Anderson viewer at the marsh installation/repair
Recreation Programming:
• Q2 Reservations were reviewed. They are much higher than last year.
• Leagues: adult summer softball (63 teams), pickleball (18 teams), volleyball (14 teams), 3 on 3
basketball (6 teams)
• Day Camp re -instated (312 registrations, $21,250 scholarships from grant)
• Contracted camps (21)
• Outdoor Movies (4) — 4 locations with a focus on equity of locations
• New Fitness Classes
• Environmental Education — Discover Camps (5 camps/61 kids), Discovery Interpretive Tables at
Olympic Beach, City Park, and Mathay-Ballinger Park
• Beach Ranger Naturalists patrolled beaches (Memorial through Labor Day)
• Birdfest (September 11)
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 2 of 10
Packet Pg. 7
2.A.a
Human Services:
• Supported Snohomish County purchase of enhanced shelter in Edmonds — a hotel on Highway 99
• Provided Frances Anderson Center workspace for South Snohomish County Community Resource
Advocate (1 day/week)
• ARPA Funding — Ordinance revision support
• Snohomish County — south county housing enhancement
• Over 50 referrals/38 active clients with 40 needs presented/26 fully met
• Relocation of long-term motel vouchers (5) for Emergency Shelter
• Program Manager increased from part time to full time.
Boards/Commissions — The department has staffed and provided public access to all remote City Board and
Commission meetings as per OPMA (Open Public Meetings Act). The Cemetery Board is at full capacity. The
Youth Commission has filled 8 positions.
2022 Q4 Upcoming: y
• 2023 Budget — Staff will continue to work through the budget with Council. �?
• Civic Park Construction
• 96t' Avenue Infiltration Project — This must be completed before Civic Park can open. o
• Parks small capital projects and greenhouse — Kyle Wood is leading this effort
• Parks Maintenance transition — Rich Lindsay will be retiring after 51 years with the City. o
• Street Tree Lights in downtown a
Q.
• Yost Pool winter operations will continue.
Q
• Fall recreation programs are up and running.
Chair Pence asked if the Civic Park will be open for public activities like festivals. Director Feser replied that
the park was designed with the intent to handle festivals and events.
Vice Chair Gladstone asked for an update on park land acquisition. Director Feser said she did a park land
presentation to Council in September but wasn't given any direction to proceed with any acquisitions. Vice
Chair Gladstone also asked about staffs intentions to engage the Planning Board with budget development.
Director Feser replied that the CFP and CIP would be introduced to the Planning Board tonight. Staff will be
soliciting recommendations, suggestions, and questions. They will return in two weeks to do a public hearing
on the same program.
Board Member Campbell asked how water runoff will be addressed at Civic Park. Director Feser replied that
all runoff will be collected and treated on site before it makes its way back through the natural system. Civic
Park has a very high water table and big pockets of peat. The 96tb Ave mitigation work is being done as part of
addressing this.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Presentation of Proposed 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program
(CIP)
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 3 of 10
Packet Pg. 8
2.A.a
City Engineer Rob English made a PowerPoint presentation regarding the proposed Public Works & Utilities
2023-2028 CFP and CIP. This includes transportation; utilities (water, stormwater sewer); facilities; and the
wastewater treatment plant.
Transportation:
• 2023 Pavement Preservation Projects — 2023 Pavement Preservation Program for maintaining existing
street infrastructure ($1.5 M); Main Street Overlay from 6th - 9th Ave; 76th Avenue Overlay Close-out
• 2023 Safety & Capacity Projects — Highway 99 Revitalization/Gateway, Highway 99 Stage 3 244t'
Street — 238t' Street; Highway 99 Stage 4 224th Street — 220t' Street; 76th Avenue/220th Street
Intersection; SR-104 Adaptive System; Guardrail Improvements; and Traffic Signal Updates
• 2023 Active Transportation Projects & Planning — Citywide Bicycle Improvements; Elm Way
Walkway; Transportation Plan Updates; Traffic Calming Program; Pedestrian Safety Program;
Citywide Street Lighting Study; Green Streets
• 2023 Water Utility — 2023 Replacement Program; 2024 Replacement Program; Yost & Seaview
Reservoir Assessment; and Waterline Overlays
• 2023 Stormwater Utility — Storm & Surface Water Comprehensive Plan; Perrinville Creek Basin
Projects; Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements; Lake Ballinger Floodplain; Stormwater
Overlays; Strom & Surface Water Comprehensive Plan; and 2024 Replacement Program
• 2023 Sewer Utility — 2023 Replacement Program; 2024 Replacement Program; Cured in -place pipe
rehabilitation; Sewerline Overlays
• 2023 Wastewater Treatment Plant — WWTP Clarifier 1 Rehabilitation; Vacuum Filter Replacement;
Nuvoda Pre -Design; Joint Sealant
Public Works & Utilities — Facilities: Boys & Girls Club, Cemetery Building, City hall, Fishing Pier, Frances
Anderson Center, Fire Station 16, Fire Station 17, Fire Station 20, Historic Log Cabin, Historic Museum,
Library, Meadowdale Club House, Old Public Works, Parks Maintenance Building, Public Safety, Public
Works O&M, Wade James Theater, and Yost Pool House
Comments and Questions:
Vice Chair Gladstone asked about the strategy for water and sewer pipeline replacement since the amounts for
2024 are significantly lower. Mr. English explained that the slideshow is only showing what is in the budget for
2023. The amounts shown for 2024 are just for the design of the 2024 project. The six -year projection would
show the full amounts. Vice Chair Gladstone then referred to the Department of Ecology's new general permit
for nutrients and asked if that is in the six -year CIP. Mr. English replied that it is not, but the Nuvoda Pre -Design
will start to address the nitrogen issue. The work that is done in 2023 will generate numbers for a project.
Board Member Campbell referred to the water and sewer line replacements and asked how they are prioritizing
pipe replacement. Mr. English replied that the Comprehensive Plan is the initial planning level document that
identifies the age of the pipes, whether there is a capacity or flow issue, and what other capital projects are
occurring in the city. These are generally the drivers for identifying pipes for replacements.
Board Member Rosen acknowledged the thoughtfulness and hard work that goes into creating a document like
this. He asked:
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 4 of 10
Packet Pg. 9
2.A.a
• How do projects get on the list for prioritization? Mr. English replied that in general it comes from the
Comprehensive Plan. They are usually ranked within the Plan. From there they look at funding
opportunities.
• He asked about the level of allocation for the Boys & Girls club since the building is going away.
Director Feser replied that they just learned last week that the Boys & Girls Club intends to demolish
the existing building and build a new one on that site. This budget was put together before that.
• How are the budget and the Comprehensive Plan connected in their development? Mr. England replied
that they build both at the same time to keep them as closely aligned as possible. He reviewed a diagram
showing the inputs that go into project selection — Mayor & City Council, available funding,
concurrency, safety, project delivery capacity, maintenance issue, grant sources and competitiveness,
and Comprehensive Plan priority.
• Is the WWTP on schedule to meet expectations for budget, schedule, and performance? Mr. England
replied that the carbon recovery project is on schedule to be finished in December, but it will take
another several months to get things operational with new equipment and processes. The goal is to have
things fully online and functioning by spring. The work is about 90% done at this point. There have
been some challenges with the contractor, but they are working through those issues.
• He referred to the escalator for inflation and asked about confidence in the budget given the increased
inflation and CPI rates. Mr. England thought that they increased the plug rate from 3% to 6% for the
first few years because of the current economic climate.
C
• Is it correct that there about a dozen sidewalks that will be installed? Mr. England replied that there are
c
projects in the six -year plan to provide opportunities to go out and apply for grants. Most funding
Q.
agencies want to know that the project is in the six -year Transportation Improvement Program or the
0.
Q
six -year Capital Improvement Program. Staff continues to apply for grants, but it is a challenge to find
$
funding for sidewalks.
Chair Pence referred to the list of paving projects and noted that there were some projects in Esperance. He
asked why the City of Edmonds would be building capital improvements in the County. Mr. England replied
that both of those projects are in the Transportation Comprehensive Plan and they both cross both Edmonds and
the unincorporated Snohomish County area. The 228th corridor is a critical transportation connection providing
an east -west corridor for the community as well as citizens living in that area. The plan is to eventually secure
funding to improve that facility. The City has had discussions with Community Transit about a future potential
transit line once those improvements are made. Chair Pence agreed on the importance of this but wondered
about Snohomish County's responsibility to be building those improvements. Why should the citizens of that
area be interested in annexation if the City is improving their neighborhoods without being annexed. Mr.
England clarified that these are not active projects, and there is no money in the budget for them. If they were
to get funding, the County would need to be a partner in those projects.
Vice Chair Gladstone asked if pipeline replacement costs include relocation that is often necessary with
transportation projects. Mr. England replied that if there were a need for replacement, the funding would come
out of that replacement program. Vice Chair Gladstone said she hopes that when the City is doing improvements
on 228ffi they will coordinate with the local district who is putting a new well in on 228t'. She then referred to
the funding difficulty with sidewalks and asked if there is a way to just do a dedicated walkway with a curb
barrier to make it safer. Mr. England replied they typically look at doing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks together.
There may be times when they could just do a curb and asphalt, but there are challenges with this related to
ADA compliance and maintenance.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 5 of 10
Packet Pg. 10
2.A.a
Director Feser reported on the Parks portion of the 2023-2028 CIP/CFP. She reviewed the PROS Plan capital
recommendations related to acquisitions to fill park system gaps; open space and conservation acquisitions;
park development and enhancements; Yost Pool replacement; trail connections; as well as ADA, accessibility,
and other user convenience enhancements. She also reviewed PROS plan goals related to engagement; diversity,
equity, and inclusion; parks, trails, and open space; waterfront use and access; natural resource and habitat
conservation; climate change, adaptation, and resiliency; recreation programs and facilities; cultural services;
and park operations and administration.
She explained the project format and funding sources, noting that the 3% increase compounded annually is what
was used for the Parks CIP/CFP because it was based on the PROS plan. She acknowledged it may not be
accurate now but stressed that the PROS plan is not a budget document; it is a planning document. The largest
funding source is unsecured grant funding (74%) but other significant sources include REET (Real Estate Excise
Tax) funds, park impact fees, and the newly formed Tree Fund.
Current/Ongoing Capital Projects include Civic Park redevelopment, 966' Ave infiltration project (Civic Park
SW mitigation), Greenhouse installation, and deferred maintenance/small capital projects. Director Feser
reviewed a distribution map showing each project with its location. She stressed that there are three big
neighborhood parks that do not have a site yet.
2023 Projects:
• Johnson Property — demolition and securing 1-acre property; Master Plan/Public Input Process — 2025;
estimated cost $282,000
• Meadowdale Playfields — inclusive playground, dugout roofs, light fixtures; estimated costs TBD
• Mathay Ballinger Park — paved loop pathway, shelter with picnic tables, permanent restroom; estimated
cost $499,300
• Yost Park & Pool — playground replacement (2023), trail/bridge repair (2024), tennis court resurface
(2025), pool upgrades (2025); estimated cost $958,200
2024 Projects:
• Columbarium Expansion Phase II — design complete, Fund 130 and 137 (Cemetery Trust Fund);
estimated cost $159,000
• Olympic Beach Park — renovation of existing restroom; estimated cost $53,000
• Pine Street Park — shelter with picnic tables (2024), paved pathway (2024), canopy shade trees (2024);
estimated cost $164,400
• Sierra Park — playground replacement; estimated cost $187,500
• Neighborhood Park SE 1- park planning (2024), park construction (2025); estimated cost $899,100 plus
parkland acquisition (2023)
• Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section — addressing accessibility, connect Brackett's
Landing North to Marina Beach Park, currently under legal review; estimated cost $819,500
• Maplewood Hill Park — playground replacement (2024), oldest playground in park system; estimated
cost $144,900
Other:
Marsh Estuary Restoration (2025) — estimated cost $14,642,500 plus restoration plus Marina Beach
Park renovation
Q
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 6 of 10
Packet Pg. 11
2.A.a
• Elm Street Park— habitat restoration (2026), nature playground (2026), shelter with picnic tables (2026);
estimated costs $225,100
• Neighborhood Park SR 99 — planning (2025), construction (2026); estimated cost $926,100 plus
parkland acquisition (2024)
• Neighborhood Park SE 2 — planning (2025), construction (2027); estimated cost $953,900 plus parkland
acquisition (2025
• 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor — parks project? No funding identified; estimated costs $9,206,600
• Park & Facilities Maintenance Building — 40+ year old building; estimated cost $5,762,600
• Seaview Park Restroom — ADA improvements (2027), replacement or renovation of restroom;
estimated cost $417,900
• Yost Pool Replacement — Pool is 50 years old, funding source TBD; estimated cost $23,881,00
Programs:
• Citywide Park Improvements/Capital Replacement —backlog of 50+projects; small capital projects and
deferred maintenance; job order contracting; estimated cost $2,700,000
• Signage and Wayfinding — trail identification, orientation markers, safety and regulatory messaging,
park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and warning signs; estimated cost $51,500
Acquisitions: °
• Parkland Acquisition — neighborhood parks SE 1, SR99 & SE 2; acquisition as feasible; estimated cost 'o
$5,230,500 Q.
Q.
• Interurban Trail Expansion — acquisition of lands, easements and/or right of ways; estimated cost g
$985,585 $
There is a currently a decision package that was put in around Yost Park and Shell Creek to deal with the erosion
that is happening there. Right now, this is ARPA funded ($220,000) but there is talk about switching it to a
capital project. This would include an existing conditions analysis, critical areas report, cultural resources
analysis, recommendations, and action plan. Capital projects maybe added by Council moving forward.
Prioritization of 2023 projects based on what was heard from the community, what is in the PROS plan and the
ability to get them done:
1. Civic Park completion (in process)
2. Green house completion (in process)
3. Mathay Ballinger Park improvements (2022 PROS Plan CIP)
4. Yost Park Playground (2022 PROS Plan CIP)
5. Johnson Property demolition (2022 PROS Plan CIP)
6. Yost Park/Shell Creek Study
Comments and Questions:
Board Member Campbell recommended moving the Park and Facilities maintenance building up in the
schedule, if possible, based on current conditions and the expansion of the Parks Department. Board Member
Rosen concurred.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 7 of 10
Packet Pg. 12
2.A.a
A. Tree Code Amendments AMD2022-0004
Urban Forest Planner Deb Powers presented the remaining minor tree code amendments and some related
moderate/major code amendments. She explained that the new list shows potential code amendments arranged
by policy impact. Minor Code Amendments #1-11 have already been discussed at a previous meeting. Ms.
Powers stressed that the intent of the amendments is to clarify and simplify the code, not change the intent.
Minor Code Amendments #12-19 / Easy to Fix per Scope:
12.
Add "subject to review"
13.
Clarify when a permit is required
14.
Identify priorities, incentives, and variations ...
15.
Emphasize Conservation Subdivision Design
16.
Clarify requirement for replacement trees
17.
Use chart format, add "viable"
18.
Reformat to clarify order of priority: retain, plant pay fee
19.
Consistently reference "City Tree Fund"
r
Ms. Powers then introduced possible related moderate/major code amendments which change the existing code:
2
12.
Define tree condition for retention with development
c
13.
Restructure as "Allowances"
17.
Consider replanting option for >24" DBH (diameter at breast height) trees (major)
6.
Retain trees with more development types (major)
Q
7.
Define tree condition for retention
20.
Reorganize ECDC 23.10
21.
Define location of high priority trees retained with development.
N
Chair Pence expressed a concern that if they make "major" or "moderate" changes there is a possibility that
they will be undoing what they did in the minor category. He wondered if they should tackle the major or
moderate amendments first. Ms. Powers explained why they were progressing through the code amendments
this way.
Board Member Campbell said she would like to see the minor changes included (redlined) when reviewing the
minor and major code amendments so they can better understand what they are considering. Ms. Powers agreed
that would simplify the process. She stated she would show all the minor code changes in a marked -up code
and they could move forward with looking at the moderate and major code amendments. She reviewed the next
steps on the project timeline and suggested that November 30 could be a special joint meeting with the Tree
Board. Chair Pence thought that would be helpful and indicated he and Tree Board Chair Janelle Cass would
try to get together prior to that.
Board Member Rosen also encouraged the joint meeting and the idea of looking at all the minor code
amendments incorporated into the code. He referred to public engagement on the timeline and asked what they
have in mind. Ms. Powers replied they are behind schedule, but they are internally reviewing an RFP to send
out to find a consultant to help with developing and implementing the plan. Board Member Rosen expressed
concern about the timeline. He noted that they are moving on from minor amendments to moderate and major
ones, but the public stakeholders haven't had an opportunity to weigh in, and staff doesn't have an RFP out yet.
He thought this could send the message that they don't really care and are just going to move ahead.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 8 of 10
Packet Pg. 13
2.A.a
Ms. Powers pointed out that the minor amendments they have finished are things that don't change the intent
of the code. The joint meeting with the Tree Board is just the first of several that will likely be happening. The
purpose is just to check in with each other at this early stage in the process. Board Member Rosen didn't think
they should assume that the public would necessarily see the minor amendments the same way they do. He
thinks it sends a poor message if they go too far without stakeholders. Ms. Powers concurred. Mr. Lien agreed
that the sooner they could get public engagement the better, but he thought it would be fine to have the joint
meeting with the Tree Board early in the process and prior to the public engagement.
There was consensus to have a joint meeting to touch base with the Tree Board about the minor code
amendments (integrated into the code) and talk about what the public engagement might be. There was
agreement to not go any further with code changes until the City has a consultant on board and has developed
the public engagement plan. Chair Pence referred to a letter from Natalie Seitz and noted that this would be in
line with her concerns about stakeholder involvement.
B. City Council Joint Meeting
Chair Pence said he talked with Council President Vivian Olson about doing a joint meeting with Council on
Tuesday, October 25. He generally reviewed what he expected to cover in the presentation to Council based on
her suggestions. He solicited any ideas from other board members.
Board Member Rosen stated the need to be clear about the purpose of the meeting. He also wanted to make sure
there was ample time to hear from all the council members. If there were things the Council brought up last
time for the Board to do, they might want to address those. Chair Pence agreed and indicated he would refer to
the minutes and/or recording of the last joint meeting to review any requests the Council had made.
Vice Chair Gladstone suggested having some discussion with the Council about how they want the interchange
with the Planning Board to be to be the most useful. She also wondered about having some discussion around
the role of the Planning Board in thinking about Esperance. Chair Pence said he had never detected much interest
from the Council in pursuing the Esperance issue and wasn't prepared to lay out this out as a topic of the Board's
interest. Board Member Rosen suggested reaching out to Council President Olson to see what her interest is on
this topic. Vice Chair Gladstone recommended explaining how it comes up in the Planning Board discussions.
Board Member Campbell noted that Esperance does tailor some of the conversations the Planning Board has.
Chair Pence noted he wanted to discuss what the Board's role is after November 5 when the Council rolls out
the draft Vision Statement. How does this become part of a community conversation about the vision of the
City of Edmonds? Board Member Rosen thought the Board would have opinions and recommendations on that
topic. He agreed it would be helpful to have information about this process from the Council prior to the release
of that draft.
There was some discussion about having a subcommittee to discuss what the Board thinks its role should be in
the roll out of the Vision Statement. Board members spoke in support of meeting in some form prior to the joint
meeting to build a consensus. Board Members Pence, Campbell, and Rosen indicated an interest in meeting as
a subcommittee prior to the joint meeting. Mr. Lien indicated he would confirm that this would be okay with
the city attorney.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 9 of 10
Packet Pg. 14
2.A.a
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Pence reviewed the extended agenda. He expressed frustration at the enormous amount of information
they received in their packet related to the CIP/CFP last week. He requested that the information be reduced or
dripped out incrementally so that the Board can make thoughtful decisions. Vice Chair Gladstone recommended
discussing this topic at the retreat if they are having one.
Chair Pence asked about the public notice for the public hearing. Mr. Lien reviewed how it is noticed. Chair
Pence recommended increasing the scope of the notices.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
ROSEN, TO SCHEDULE A SPECIAL MEETING ON NOVEMBER 30. MOTION PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
None.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2022 Page 10 of 10
Packet Pg. 15
6.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/26/2022
2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Public Hearing
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Kernen Lien
Background/History
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at
least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital
improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in
order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth
Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects.
These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with
capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related
projects.
Staff Recommendation
Conduct Public Hearing for the 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program
Narrative
The 2022-2027 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are being presented
in one document with project lists that identify Capital Facility projects and project information sheets
for all projects and programs.
The Public Works and Utilities Department proposed 2023-2028 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1.
The Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department proposed 2023-2028 CFP/CIP is included as
Attachment 2.
Following the Planning Board's Public Hearing and recommendation, the City Council will also hold a
Public Hearing prior to final approval.
Attachments:
Parks CIP—CFP 2023-2028
Public Works 2023-2028 CIP-CFP
Packet Pg. 16
A!. -k-
EDMON DS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
2023-2028 PROPOSED
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
"ILA
Table of Contents
Director's Letter................................................................ 2
CIP/CFP Worksheets.......................................................3-6
Project Distribution Map
................................................. 7
Project Descriptions......................................................8-28
Program Descriptions...................................................29-32
Acquisition Descriptions...............................................33-35
FundDetail.....................................................................
36
Fund 332 Detail............................................................37-38
Fund 125 Detail..............................................................
39
Fund 126 Detail..............................................................
40
Fund 143 Detail..............................................................
41
Fund 137 Detail..............................................................
42
Project Comparison........................................................
43
6.A.a
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
October 12, 2022
Members of the City Council, Parks & Planning Board, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds,
It is an honor to present the 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) & Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The
CIP/CFP serve as a long-range planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources, both
secured and unsecured. The CIP/CFP is updated each year and presented in conjunction with the operating
budget.
In 2022 the Parks, Recreation and Human Services Department completed the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open
Space (PROS) Plan based largely on citizens priorities and multiple rounds of review prior to adoption.
The 2022 PROS Plan goals are:
1. Encourage and facilitate meaningful public involvement in park and recreation planning.
2. Decrease barriers and provide increased opportunities for participation and representative cultural,
heritage and art programs, events representing the diversity of Edmonds demographics.
3. Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of year-round recreation opportunities
and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural identity and the natural environment.
4. Preserve and pursue opportunities to expand public access and enjoyment of Edmonds' waterfront.
5. Conserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and
environmental education.
6. Adapt to climate change and increase local park system resiliency by improving environmental conditions,
stewardship and sustainability in parks, trails, open spaces and recreation facilities within planning,
development, maintenance, and operations.
7. Provide a varied and inclusive suite of recreation opportunities and experiences to promote health and
wellness, year-round activity and social engagement.
The adopted 2022 PROS plan included a CIP document which is consistent with this 2023-28 CIP/CFP. In 2023 the
Parks, Recreation and Human Services Department will focus on completion of the largest ever City of Edmonds
Parks Capital project, the redevelopment of the 8-acre Civic Center Playfields. In addition, the department will
continue to focus on deferred maintenance of existing parks and recreation facilities and playground renovations
and acquisition of additional parkland to fill system gaps in park services and to address inequities in parkland
distribution.
Your Parks, Recreation and Human Services Department is proud to serve the citizens of Edmonds and we look
forward keeping the Edmonds Parks safe and enjoyable for all.
Sincerely,
Angie Feser
Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director
425-771-0256
Angie. Feser@ EdmondsWA.gov
Page 2
Packet Pg. 19
2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Toti
#
Johnson Property
R2
Demolition and securing existing site, Master plan for park use. Site
$ 200,000
$
$ 82,000
$
$
$
$ 282,0(
P5
development not included in estimate.
Meadowdale Playfields
R3
Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
$
$
$
existing ILA. To include addition of dugout roofs, light replacement and
playground upgrade.
D5
Mathay Ballinger Park
D6
Park improvements to include a new paved loop pathway, permanent
$ 499,300
$ -
$ -
$
$
$
$ 499,3(
D7
restrooms and a small shelter with picnic tables.
R9
Yost Park & Pool
R4
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include a playground
$ 257,500
$ 154,300
$ 546,400
$
$
$
$ 958,2(
R6
replacement, resurface of tennis courts, pool upgrades and trail, bridge
R11
and boardwalk repairs/replacement.
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
D8
Expansion of the current columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery
$
$ 159,100
$
$
$
$
$ 159,1(
Trust Fund 137.
R7
Olympic Beach Park
$
$ 53,000
$
$
$
$
$ 53,0(
Renovation of existing restrooms.
D10
Pine Street Park
D11
Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables,
$
$ 164,400
$
$
$
$
$ 164,4(
D12
canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway.
R8
Sierra Park
$
$ 185,700
$
$
$
$
$ 185,7(
Playground replacement.
Neighborhood Park SE 1
X
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds.
$
$ 79,600
$ 819,500
$
$
$
$ 899,1(
D13
$1.5M parkland acquisition listed below.
Waterfront Walkway
P3
Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to
$
$ 515,000
$ 819,500
$
$
$
$ 1,334,5(
D14
Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide
Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements.
c
m
E
m
0
Q.
E
ca
U
c
Id
d
u_
U
C
R
d
v
M
LL
r
.Q
M
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
04
00
N
0
N
M
N
O
N
a
LL
U
I
a_
U
Y
a
c
E
t
R
a
Page 3
Packet Pg. 20
2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Toti
#
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
$
$
$ 144,900
$
$
$
$ 144,9(
Playground replacement.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Master Plan and Master Plan implementation of the Marsh to daylight the
X
P4
D9
connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two fresh water
$
$
$ 5,900,700
$
$
$
$ 5,900,7(
creeksproviding restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary and natural tidal
D1
exchange. Restoration expenses are not included in this estimate. ($8M
Acquisition expense listed below).
D16
Elm Street Park
D17
Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground,
$
$
$
$ 225,100
$
$
$ 225,1(
R14
small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration.
Neighborhood Park SR99
X
D15
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$
$
$
$ 928,500
$
$
$ 928,5(
Edmonds. ($1.5M parkland acquisition listed below).
Neighborhood Park SE 2
X
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$
$
$
$ 84,400
$ 869,500
$
$ 953,9(
D18
Edmonds. ($2M parkland acquisition listed below).
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor
Prioritized in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and State certified
P8
Creative District. Improvements encourage pedestrian traffic and provide
$
$
$
$ 2,251,000
$ 6,955,600
$
$ 9,206,6(
D19
visual connection between ECA and downtown contributing to economic vitality.
Funding TBD.
X
P1
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
$
$
$
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$
$ 5,762,6(
D2
Replace and/or renovate deteriorating building in City Park.
R16
Seaview Park
$
$
$
$ -
$ 417,900
$
$ 417,9(
Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades.
X
R15
Pool Replacement
$
$
$ _
$ -
$ -
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,0(
Replacement of the existing pool. Location, design and funding TBD.
(A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS
$ 956,800
$ 1,311,100
$ 8,313,000
$ 4,614,500
$ 12,880,100
$ 23,881,000
$ 51,956,5(
c
m
E
m
0
Q.
E
V
c
Id
a
LL
U_
c
R
d
U)
2
v
to
LL
to
(U
00
N
0
N
M
N
O
N
00
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
IL
LL
(U
I
a_
U
Y
a
c
t
U
R
Q
Page 4
Packet Pg. 21
2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
R17
This ongoing program allocates funds for the regular and deferred maintenance,
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,0(
repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment.
Signage & Wayfinding
R10
Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a
$ -
$ 51,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 51,5(
consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system.
Playground Upgrade Program
R13
Annual upgrades of playground equipment and fall surfacing to provide
$
$
$
$ 197,000
$ 202,900
$ 209,000
$ 608,9(
additional inclusive playgrounds/facilities providing access for children
-
-
-
of all ages and abilities.
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to
$ 123,000
$ 148,000
$ 198,000
$ 198,000
$ 198,000
$ 148,000
$ 1,013,0(
Engineering for Capital Project Support.
(B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ 573,000
$ 649,500
$ 648,000
1 $ 845,000
$ 850p900
$ 807,000
$ 4,373,4(
PARKLAND
ACQUISITION
X
A2
Neighborhood Park SE 1
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$
$
$
$
$ 1,500,0(
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
X
A3
Neighborhood Park SR99
$ -
$ 1,545,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,545,0(
Acquisition of parkland in near SR 99.
X
A4
Neighborhood Park SE 2
$
$ -
$ 2,185,500
$
$
$
$ 2,185,5(
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
X
Al
Acquisition of the Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh
$
$
$ 8,741,800
$
$
$
$ 8,741,8(
restoration.
A5
Interurban Trail
$
$
$
$
$
$ 895,585
$ 895,5i
Extension and acquisition
(C) SUBTOTAL - PARKLAND ACQUISITION
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,545,000
$ 10,927,300
$ -
$
$ 895,585
$ 14,867,81
(D) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B+C) 1 $ 3,029,800 1 $ 3,505,600 1 $ 19,888,300 1 $ 5,459,500 1 $ 13,731,000 1 $ 25,583,585 1 $ 71,197,71
c
m
E
m
0
Q.
E
.Q
V
c
Id
d
U_
C
R
a
T)
v
M
u_
r
.Q
M
(U
0
N
0
N
M
N
0
0
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
a
LL
U
I
a_
U
L
a
C
0
E
t
0
Q
Page 5
Packet Pg. 22
2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6.A.a
PARKS CIP REVENUE
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Toti
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,0
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) 11 - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 10,000,0(
Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100
$ 848,350
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 3,098,3
Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 1,194,0
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - Columbarium Expansion
$ 70,971
$ 73,270
$ 67,728
$ 69,864
$ 72,108
$ 74,463
$ 428,4(
Operating Contribution - General Fund
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 42,255
$ 54,144
$ 64,828
$ 74,243
$ 84,030
$ 94,111
$ 413,6:
Donations
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
Bond Proceeds
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Secured Grants
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Unsecured Grants/Funding
$
$
$ 7,263,500
$ 4,276,900
$ 12,462,200
$ 23,881,000
$ 47,883,6(
(E) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE
$ 3,360,576
$ 2,976,413
$ 9,745,056
$ 6,770,007
$ 14,967,338
$ 26,398,574
$ 64,217,91
Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
(F) Beginning Fund Balance (Funds 332 + 332-100)
$ 2,383,820
$ 2,444,625
$ 1,802,269
$ (8,689,703)
$ (7,563,660)
$ (6,598,430)
(E) Revenue
$ 3,360,576
$ 2,976,413
$ 9,745,056
$ 6,770,007
$ 14,967,338
$ 26,398,574
(D) Expenditures
$ 3,029,800
$ 3,505,600
$ 19,888,300
$ 5,459,500
$ 13,731,000
$ 25,583,585
(G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D)
$ 2,714,596
$ 1,915,438
$ (8,340,975)
$ (7,379,196)
$ (6,327,322)
$ (5,783,440)
Project Type:
A Acquisition
P Master Planning
D Development - New
R Replacement / Upgrade
c
m
E
m
O
Q.
E
.Q
tJ
c
Id
a
LL
U_
c
M
a
v
M
LL
r
.Q
M
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
Page 6
Packet Pg. 23
6.A.a
R2, P5
Johnson Property
R3
Meadowdale Playfields
D5, D6, D7
Mathay Ballinger Park
R9, R4, R6, R11
Yost Park & Pool
D8
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
R7
Olympic Beach Park
D10, D11, D12
Pine Street Park
R8
Sierra Park
P3, D14
Waterfront Walkway
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
P4, D9, D1
Edmonds Marsh Restoration
(Willow Creek Daylighting)
D16, D17, R14
Elm Street Park
P8, D19
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor
P1, D2
Parks Building
R16
Seaview Park
R15
Pool Replacement
Al
Edmonds Marsh Restoration
(Willow Creek Daylighting)
AS
Interurban Trail
* Non -site specific projects
A2 , P2, D13
Neighborhood Park SE 1
A3, P6, D15
Neighborhood Park SR99
A4, P7, D18
Neighborhood Park SE 2
R17
Citywide Park Improvements
R10
Signage & Wayfinding
R13
Playground Upgrade Program
(2027 & 2028)
Alm
* Site specific projects only.
R1S HIM
_
■rR2 P�5 � i�
I�
■I J '
!�
tAil
11 %fl
'f
wV,•p;,
AS
annual citywide projects iia w wn—"'— Packet Pg. 24
2023-2028
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
PROJECTS
h �' mot,`_ �• n�
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
(L
LL
L)
I
d
U
L
a.
E
t
u
cc
r
a
Page 8 1
Packet Pg. 25
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Johnson Property - R2 & PS
9309 Bowdoin Way
Project Summary: This project is the demolition and securing of the 1-acre property donated by Shirley Johnson in
2021. There is a small uninhabitable house, several small outbuildings and historic fruit and nut trees which have all
been neglected for years. The site is becoming overrun with invasive plant species including Holly trees and
blackberries. By removing the structures and clearing invasives, the city will be able to better start restoration on the
many fruit and nut trees.
Project Justification: The overgrown vegetation and abandoned buildings create an environment that can attract
unwanted visitors and activity to the site which is currently not open to the public. This project is supported by 1
Recommendation, 5 Goals and 11 Objectives of the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 3.1— Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to
ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.10; Goal 5,
Objective 5.1; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.5 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $282,000
Construction (R2) — site demo
$200,000
$200,000
Planning & Design (P5)
$82,000
$82,000
Total Expenses
$200,000
$82,000
$282,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$200,000
$82,000
$282,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$200,000
$82,000
$282,000
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
u_
U
I
a
U
Y
L
IL
c
m
E
z
v
c�
Q
Page 9
Packet Pg. 26
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Meadowdale Playfields - R3
1681h ST SW, Lynnwood
Project Summary: The City of Lynnwood is replacing the existing playground and upgrading to a fully inclusive level
of the play structure, will be adding dugout roofs, and replacing the light fixtures within a 6-year planning horizon.
Project Justification: The cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds and Edmonds School District currently have an Interlocal
Agreement (ILA) for Meadowdale Park for shared cost of capital improvements, renovations, and ongoing
maintenance. The ILA states "The District and Cities agree to jointly plan for additional capital expenditures for
maintenance and replacement costs for the Playfields. This work is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 5
Objectives of the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1.2 — Expand partnerships
and agreements with the Edmonds School District, Snohomish County, and other nearby jurisdictions (cities of
Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Woodway, and Shoreline) to improve public access and opportunities for outdoor
recreation and Recommendation 6.2 - Implement upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped
entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.6; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, 3.10 and 3.11 and Goal 7,
Objective 7.2 also align with this work.
Estimated Cost: TBD, negotiations are ongoing with the City of Lynnwood.
•
2027
2028
Total
Construction (R3)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Expenses
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Ending Fund Balance/Impact Fees - 332
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Revenue
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
u_
U
I
a
v
Y
L
IL
c
m
E
z
v
Q
Page 10
Packet Pg. 27
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Mathay Ballinger Park - D51 D6 & D7
24100 78th Place West
Project Summary: Park improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park to include the addition of a permanent restroom, a
small shelter with picnic tables and a paved loop pathway to provide ADA accessibility to the playground and connect
the paved Interurban Trail to 78t" Place West Street.
Project Justification: Upgrades to this park are supported by 5 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 8 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.3 is to prioritize improvements to Mathay
Ballinger Park and upgrade, enhance or replace park amenities, specifically the play amenities. Recommendation 3.5
is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park ... and paved pathway
connections in Mathay Ballinger Park. Recommendation 6.4 is to install permanent restrooms at Marina Beach Park
and Mathay Ballinger Park. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.6, Goal 3 Objectives 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9 Goal 9
Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1 and 6.2 also align with these upgrades.
Estimated Cost: $499,300
2023
20241
126
2027
2028
Construction (D5) — Paved Loop Pathway $53,000
$53,000
Construction (W) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $75,000
$75,000
Construction (N) — Permanent Restroom $371,300
$371,000
Total Expenses $499,300
$499,300
Ending Fund Balance/Impact Fees - 332 $371,300
$371,300
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $128,000
$128,000
Total Revenue $499,300
Unsecured Funding $0
$499,300
so
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
a-
LL
V
I
d
U
L
c�
a.
c
m
E
t
U
a
Page 11
Packet Pg. 28
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Yost Park & Pool - R9, R4, R6 & R11
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include a playground replacement, resurface of
tennis courts, pool upgrades and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs / replacement. The playground at Yost Park
installed in 1995, is 27 years old, has reached the end of its lifecycle, is not ADA accessible and is scheduled to be
replaced in 2023.
Project Justification: To maintain safety amenities should be repaired and/or replaced as supported in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan Recommendation 3.1 which is to maintain, renovate or replace aging or
damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety and Recommendation
3.4 replace the playgrounds at ... Yost Memorial Park. In addition, this work is supported by PROS Plan Goal 1,
Objective 1.1 and 1.4; Goal 3, Objective 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objective 4.4, Goal 5, Objective 5.4; Goal 6, Objective
6.5; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.10 and 6.2 for a total of 4 Recommendations, 6 Goals and 9
Objectives.
Estimated Cost: $958,200
Construction (R4)—Trail/Bridge Repair
2023 20241
$80,000
126
2027
2028
$80,000
Construction (R6) — Playground Replacement
$257,500
$257,500
Construction (R9)—Tennis Court Resurface
$74,300
$74,300
Construction (R11) — Pool Upgrades
$546,400
$546,400
Total Expenses
$257,500 $154,300
$546,400
$958,200
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$546,400
$958,200
Total Revenue
$546,400
$958,200
Unsecured Funding
ij;;"
1
1
00
N
O
N
M
N
0
N
IL
u_
U
I
d
U
Y
R
d
r
c
m
E
t
r
r
Q
Page 12
Packet Pg. 29
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Columbarium Expansion Phase II — D8
820 15th St SW, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
Project Summary: Expansion of the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Columbarium. Funding provided through the
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 which accumulates fund balance based on Cemetery usage and revenue generated.
Project Justification: As the existing columbarium continues to fill up, it is appropriate to begin planning for the Phase
II expansion. The design is complete and since it is continuation of phase improvements, should be relatively simple
to implement.
Estimated Cost: $159,100
2023
20241
126 2027 2028
Construction (D8) — Columbarium Expansion
$159,100
$159,100
Total Expenses
$159,100
$159,100
Fund Balance Cemetery Trust — Fund 137
$159,100
$159,100
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$159,100
1
$159,100
1
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
u_
U
a�
v
Y
L
IL
c
m
E
z
c�
Q
Page 13
Packet Pg. 30
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Olympic Beach Park - R7
200 Admiral Way, Entrance of the Fishing Pier
Project Summary: Renovation of existing restroom and Visitor Center.
Project Justification: This work is supported by 3 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach,
Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objective 4.1; Goal 9, Objective
9.1 and Recommendation 6.3 also align with these upgrades.
Estimated Cost: $53,000
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a-
LL
U
I
d
U
Y
L
R
CL
c�
C
ci
r
Q
Page 14
Packet Pg. 31
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Pine Street Park - D10, D11 & D12
6th and Pine Street
Project Summary: Park improvements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, canopy shade trees
and a paved connecting pathway.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation IS is to add amenities to existing parks, such
as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park and paved pathway connections in
Mathay Ballinger Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and
Recommendation 6.2 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $159,100
Construction (D10) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables
2023 20241
$79,600
126 2027 2028
$79,600
Construction (D11) — Paved Pathway
$58,300
$58,300
Construction (D12) — Canopy Shade Trees
$26,500
$26,500
Total Expenses
$164,400
$164,400
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$164,400
$164,400
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$164,400
1
$164,400
so
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a-
LL
L)
I
d
U
d
r
c
m
E
t
U
2
a
Page 15
Packet Pg. 32
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Sierra Park — R8
81st Ave W & 190th St SW
Project Summary: Replacement of the playground and fall surfacing at Sierra Park. The playground is 27 years old and
is currently the smallest playground in the park system.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at
Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, Goal
9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $164,400
Page 16
Packet Pg. 33
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 1— P2, D13
w
Project Summary: Acquire and develop an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an
existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized a Master
Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on
the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $899,100 + Parkland Acquisition
2023 20241 126
Planning— Neighborhood Park SE 1 (P2) $79,600
2027 2028
$79,600
Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (D13) $819,500
$819,500
Total Expenses $79,600 $819,500
$899,100
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $79,600
$79,600
Total Revenue 1 1 $79,600 1 1
Unsecured Funding 1 11
1$79,600
11
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a-
LL
U
I
d
U
Y
d
r
c
al
E
t
U
2
r
a
Page 17
Packet Pg. 34
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section - P3 & D14
Beachfront in front of Ebb Tide Condominiums (200 Beach Place)
Project Summary: This would connect the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina Beach Park
ensuring all individuals, including those with mobility challenges and those pushing strollers can safely enjoy the
waterfront. The final missing piece would be constructed in front of the Ebb Tide condominiums in the easement
owned by the City of Edmonds. The easement and walkway design are currently under legal review.
Project Justification: To provide public access along the waterfront for all individuals. Completion of the walkway
would meet ADA requirements, support efforts to keep dogs off of the beaches and was recognized as a high priority
by residents participating in the development of the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. This project is
supported by 1 Recommendation, 3 Goals and 5 Objectives in the PROS Plan. Recommendation 6.2 is to implement
upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure
universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 3,
Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4, Goal 6, Objective 6.7 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $1,250,000
00
N
O
N
M
N
0
N
d
LL
U
I
d
U
U)
Y
L
R
r—
cd
i
ci
r
Q
Page 18
Packet Pg. 35
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Maplewood Hill Park — R12
19800 89th PI W
Project Summary: Replacement of the existing playground installed in 1985. This playground is 38 years old and is
the oldest in the park system.
Project Justification: This improvement is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill
Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1
and Recommendation 3.1 also align with this improvement.
Estimated Cost: $144,900
Page 19
Packet Pg. 36
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) - Al, P4, D9 & D1
Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh and property owned by Unocal (Chevron Services Co.)
Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh restoring the natural tidal exchange. This
project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including daylighting of Willow Creek
within the park.
Project Justification: The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow
Chinook salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural
redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. This project is supported
by 3 Recommendations, 5 Goals and 8 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 2.2 — Expand the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary to include the Unocal property. Develop funding
strategy for purchase of the Unocal property or negotiate with the State of Washington to have the property become
part of the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 4, Objective 4.3; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1,
5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5 and 6.7; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; Recommendation 2.1 and 3.11 also align with this
project.
Estimated Cost: $14,642,500 + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation
Continued on next page.
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
u_
U
I
a
v
Y
L
a
c
m
E
z
c�
Q
Page 20
Packet Pg. 37
6.A.a
Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) — continued.
Land Acquisition (Al)
$8,741,800
Total
$8,741,800
Master Plan (134)
$273,200
$273,200
Master Plan Implementation (D9)
$5,627,500
$5,627,500
Restoration (D1) - TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Expenses
$14,642,500
$14,642,500
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$273,200
$273,200
Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Bond Proceeds
Secured Grants
Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition
Park Donations
Operating Contribution — General Fund
Stormwater — Fund 422
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$273,200
00
$273,200
00
Project Accounting #M070
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Page 21
Packet Pg. 38
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Elm Street Park - D16, D17 & R14
7t" & Elm Street
Project Summary: Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter with picnic tables
and habitat restoration.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 is to add amenities to existing parks, such
as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal
9, Objective 9.1; and Recommendation 3.5 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $225,100
Construction (R14) — Habitat Restoration
2025 2026 2027
$56,300
2028 Total
$56,300
Construction (D16) — Nature Playground
$84,400
$84,400
Construction (D17) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables
$84,400
$84,400
Total Expenses
$225,100
$225,100
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$168,800
$168,800
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$168,800
ii
$168,800
00
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a-
u_
U
I
a
U
L
d
E
t
V
2
a
Page 22
Packet Pg. 39
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SR 99 — P6 & D15
Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SR 99 area to address an
existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized a Master
Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on
the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $926,100 + Parkland Acquisition
2023 20241
126 2027 2028
Planning— Neighborhood Park SR99 (P6)
$82,000
$82,000
Construction — Neighborhood Park SR 99 (D15)
$844,100
$844,100
Total Expenses
$82,000 $844,100
$926,100
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$82,000
$82,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$82,000 1 1 1$82,000
1 11
11
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
10
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
d
u_
U
I
d
U
d
r
c
m
E
t
U
2
r
a
Page 23
Packet Pg. 40
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 2 — P7, D18
AC
.�
Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address
an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized a
Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be
based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $953,900 + Parkland Acquisition
2023 20241
126
2027 2028
Planning— Neighborhood Park SE 2 (P7)
$84,400
$84,400
Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (D18)
$869,500
$869,500
Total Expenses
$84,400 $869,500
$953,900
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$84,400
$84,500
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$84,400 1 $0 1
1 11
1 $84,500
11
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
d
u_
U
I
d
U
Y
d
r
c
m
E
t
U
2
r
a
Page 24
Packet Pg. 41
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor - P8 & D19
41h Avenue from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the Arts, Downtown
Project Summary: Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for
a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual
connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project
since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary
design development through 2020-21. Funding for this project has not been secured at this time.
Project Justification: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and
provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity
as an attractive walking corridor and contribute to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported
by the community in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative
District. This project is supported by 1 Goal, 2 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan -
Goal 8, Objectives 8.1 and 8.6.
Estimated Cost: $9,206,600 - Project Accounting #C538
Planning & Design (138)
$2,251,000
$2,251,000
Construction (D19)
$6,955,600
$6,955,600
Total Expenses
$2,251,000
$6,955,600
$9,206,600
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100
Operating contribution — general fund
Secured Grants
Total Revenue
$0
$0
$0
0
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
a-
u_
U
a
U
L
c�
d
r
c
m
E
t
U
M
41
r
a
Page 25
Packet Pg. 42
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2
600 3rd Avenue South, City Park
Project Summary: The 40+ year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and needs
major renovation or replacement and is too small to accommodate current staff and needed work areas.
Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work
areas and fixed equipment in order to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. The city's small
equipment repair garage is used as the Park Maintenance locker room, daily meeting room, computer access (one
for 11 FTEs) and work preparation space. It is insufficient for work efficiency and due to small size, inadequate for
expansion of staffing with upcoming park and street landscape work requirements. This project is supported by 1
Goals, 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3
and 9.9 align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $6,955,600
2023
20241
126
2027
2028
Planning &Design (P1)
$1,125,500
$1,125,500
Construction (D2)
$4,637,100
$4,637,100
Total Expenses
$1,125,500
$4,637,100
$5,762,600
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Park Impact Fees — Fund 332-100
Bond Proceeds
Operating Contribution — General Fund
Park Donations
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement
Proeram
0000.00
(CIP)
00
N
O
N
A
N
O
N
d
u_
U
I
d
U
U)
Y
L
R
a
r
c
d
E
t
Q
Page 26
Packet Pg. 43
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Seaview Park Restroom — R16
80th Ave W & 186th St SW
Project Summary: ADA improvements to include renovation or replacement of the permanent restroom
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6 is to make improvements to existing parks
as needed to ensure proper maintenance, usability and quality of park features and grounds to remove barriers and
improve universal access. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park
and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1 and
6.2 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $417,900
2023
20241
126 2027 2028
Construction (R16) - Restroom Replacement
$417,900
$417,900
Total Expenses
$417,900
$417,900
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$417,900
$417,900
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$417,900
1
$417,900
1
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
d
LL
U
I
d
U
rn
Y
L
R
r-
cd
C
M
U
r
Q
Page 27
Packet Pg. 44
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Yost Pool Replacement — R15
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for
many residents. In addition to teaching our youth water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity for community
members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. Funding for this project has not been identified and would
likely require voter approval.
Project Justification: Replacing Yost Pool is supported by 4 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 4 is to replace Yost Pool. PROS Plan Goal 1,
Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 7, Objective 7.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations
3.1, 4.1, 4.2 and 6.2 also align with this replacement.
Estimated Cost: $23,881,000
123
20241
126
2027 2028
Planning & Construction (1115)
$23,881,000
$23,881,000
Total Expenses
$23,881,000
$23,881,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Secured Grants
Bonds
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
Caoital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement
Proeram (CIP)
$0 $0
111 111
00
N
O
N
eM
N
O
N
d
u_
U
I
d
U
L
c�
a
r
c
al
E
t
U
2
r
a
Page 28
Packet Pg. 45
I 6.A.a I
2023-2028
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
PROGRAMS
W-4
Y EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 29
Packet Pg. 46
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17
Project Summary: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) plan identified a significant list of deferred park
maintenance projects. With the addition of a Parks Capital Project Manager, hired in 2022 and the Job Order
Contracting program, the Parks Department will begin to make progress on the needed system -wide repairs,
renovations and replacements of an aging parks infrastructure.
Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs,
increased City liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. This program is supported by 5
Recommendations, 6 Goals and 21 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 3.1 is to Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties
to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.7, 3.8
and 3.9; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2, 4.4; Goal 5, Objective 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7;
Goal 9, Objective 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.9 and Recommendations 3.7, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 also align with this program.
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 (6-year total)
Repair & Maintenance
$300,000
$300,000
2025
$300,000
2026
$300,000
2027
$300,000
2028Total
$300,000
$1,800,000
Professional Services
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$900,000
Total Expenses
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$2,700,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$2,700,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$450,000
so
$450,000 1
i
$450,000 1
$450,000
i
$450,000
so
1 $450,000 1
$2,700,000
i
0
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
a
u_
U
i
a
U
L
c�
a.
c
m
E
t
U
M
41
r
a
Page 30
Packet Pg. 47
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Signage & Wayfinding — R10
• VIEW POINT PLAY STRUCTURE
NATURAL AREA&DOG WALK
PARK OPEN DAWN TO DUSK
Project Summary: Update signage system wide to include uniform and accurate trail identification information,
orientation markers, safety and regulatory messaging, park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information
and warning signs.
Project Justification: A comprehensive and consistent signage system is necessary to inform, orient and educate park
users. This program is supported by 2 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Opens Space (PROS) plan. Recommendation 6.5 is to develop and provide consistent graphics and citywide signage to
improve communication on access, usability and "branding" of the city's park and open space system. PROS Plan Goal
2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objective 3.6; Goal 5, Objectives 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and
Recommendation 6.2 also align with this program.
Estimated Cost: $51,500
1
M"
1 1. 1 1
Planning & construction (R10)
$51,500
$51,500
Total Expenses
$51,500
$51,500
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$51,500
$51,500
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding1
$51,500
$51500
00
N
0
N
M
N
O
N
IL
U
I
d
U
In
Y
IC
d
�i
C
d
E
t
V
R
r-+
r
Q
Page 31
Packet Pg. 48
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Playground Replacement / Inclusive Upgrades — R13
Project Summary: City of Edmonds owns, operates and maintains 15 playgrounds and only two of them are
considered fully inclusive and accessible (Seaview and Civic Park). One of the Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Department initiatives is to continually update playgrounds which range in installation dates from 1985 - 2019. As
part of these scheduled updates the department will work to enhance playgrounds to be inclusive versus merely
meeting ADA standards. In many cases this includes enhanced play surfacing and play equipment that provide for
users of all abilities.
Elm Street Park, Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Park playgrounds have been identified as priority in the
PROS Plan and will be addressed in the first three years of this capital improvement plan.
Project Justification: Playground upgrades are a necessary part of maintaining a safe play environment. With
playgrounds that are 35+ years old many are scheduled for upgrades. Further, it is the goal of the City to ensure that
those upgrades include considerations for children of all physical and mental abilities and that these play amenities
are designed to be a welcoming and healthy experience for all. This program is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3
Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) plan. Recommendation 3.1 is to
Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing Cit properties to ensure public accessibility,
use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8 and Recommendation
6.2 also align with this program.
Estimated Cost: $197,000
Construction (R13)
$197,000 $202,900
$209,000
$608,900
Total Expenses
$197,000 $202,900
$209,000
$608,900
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$197,000 $202,900
$209,000
$608,900
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$197,000 $202,900
$0 $0
$209,000
i
$608,900
i
00
N
O
N
M
N
0
N
a
u_
U
I
d
U
Y
L
R
r-
d
E
t
r
r
Q
Page 32
Packet Pg. 49
:9 j P
IA N rkq WA
Age
•
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Parkland Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1, SR 99 & SE 2 - A2, A3 & A4
Project Summary: Acquisition of parkland when feasible that will benefit citizens and support the priorities identified
in the PROS Plan. Currently, $900,000 is reserved for parkland and open space acquisition. These funds were
accumulated in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. There is no request to purchase a specific property at this time as
opportunities are somewhat limited in a mostly built -out city, but staff continues to search for, develop and negotiate
opportunities.
Project Justification: Parkland Acquisitions are supported by 1 Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives (land
purchase only, see previous projects for development) in the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas
such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2,
3.3 and 3.9 also align with the acquisition of parkland.
Estimated Cost: $5,230,500
2023
20241
126
2027
2028
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2) $1,500,000
$1,500,000
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3) $1,545,000
$1,545,000
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4)
$2,185,500
$2,185,500
Total Expenses $1,500,000 $1,545,000
$2,185,500
$5,230,500
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $1,100,000 $200,000
$200,000
$1,500,000
Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD
Total Revenue $1,100,000 $200,000
$200,000
$1,500,000
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Ib
N
O
N
.
A
N
0
N
a-
u_
U
I
d
U
Y
(L
c
a)
E
t
U
2
r
a
Page 34
Packet Pg. 51
6.A.a
Parks & Recreation
Interurban Trail Expansion — A5
4
t .
24100 78`h Place West
Project Summary: Acquisition of additional lands, easements and/or right-of-ways to continue the Interurban Trail,
including more off -road segments.
Project Justification: This Expansion is supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 5 is to improve trail connections including
sidewalks and bike lanes to help link destinations across the community. Recommendation 5.1 suggests the City
peruse opportunities to acquire additional lands, easements and/or right of way to continue the Interurban Trail.
Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6 and Recommendations 1.1 and 5.2 also align with
this expansion.
Estimated Cost: $895,585
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a-
LL
U
I
d
U
L
r_
d
E
M
V
2
a
Page 35
Packet Pg. 52
2023-2028
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
FUND DETAIL
4EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 36 I
Packet Pg. 53
Fund 332
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Fund 332 Expenditures
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
D9
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation)
$ 5,627,500
$ 5,627,500
D1
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Restoration)
$ -
R14
Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration
$ 56,300
$ 56,300
R3
Meadowdale Playfields (Renovations, City of Lynnwood ILA)
$ -
D6
Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms
$ 371,300
$ 371,300
D13
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Park Development)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
D15
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Park Development)
$ 844,100
$ 844,100
D18
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Park Development)
$ 869,500
$ 869,500
R15
Pool Replacement
$23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
D14
Waterfront Walkway (Construction)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
P8
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor (Design Completion)
$ 2,251,000
$ 2,251,000
D19
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor (Construction)
$ 6,955,600
$ 6,955,600
P1
Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design)
$ 1,125,500
$ 1,125,500
D2
Parks Facilities M&O Building (Construction)
$ 4,637,100
$ 4,637,100
Interfund Services
$ 25,000
$ 50,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 50,000
$ 425,000
Debt Service Civic Park $1.6M (2021)
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 588,000
(C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures
$ 494,300
$ 148,000
$ 7,464,500
$ 4,474,900
$12,660,200
$24,029,000
$49,270,900
Fund 332 Revenue
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
Park Impact Fees (Fund 332-100)
$ 848,350
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 3,098,350
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 42,255
$ 54,144
$ 64,828
$ 74,243
$ 84,030
$ 94,111
$ 413,612
Miscellaneous Park Donations
$ -
Bond Proceeds
$
General Fund Transfer
$ -
Unsecured Grants - Marsh Estuary Restoration
$ 5,624,500
$ 5,624,500
Unsecured Grants - Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration
$ 56,300
$ 56,300
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 1 (Development)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development)
$ 844,100
$ 844,100
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 2 (Development)
$ 869,500
$ 869,500
Unsecured Grants - Waterfront Walkway (Construction)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
Unsecured Grants - 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor
$ 2,251,000
$ 6,955,600
$ 9,206,600
Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc) Pool Replacement
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$ 5,762,600
�(D) TOTAL Fund 332 Revenue
$ 890,605
$ 504,144
$ 7,778,328
$ 4,801,143
$12,996,230
$24,425,111
$51,395,562
C
d
E
d
O
L
E
V
C
Id
a
LL
U_
c
R
d
Y)
T
v
O
LL
r
O
U
00
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
00
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
a
LL
U
I
a_
U
Y
a
C
O
E
t
U
ca
Q
Page 37 Packet Pg. 54
Fund 332
6.A.a
Fund 332 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
(E) Beginning Fund Balance (332 + 332-100)
$ 1,408,492
$ 1,804,797
$ 2,160,941
$ 2,474,769
$ 2,801,012
$ 3,137,042
(D) Revenue
$ 890,605
$ 504,144
$ 7,778,328
$ 4,801,143
$12,996,230
$24,425,111
(C) Expenditures
$ 494,300
$ 148,000
$ 7,464,500
$ 4,474,900
$12,660,200
$24,029,000
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 1,804,797
$ 2,160,941
1 $ 2,474,769
$ 2,801,012
$ 3,137,042
$ 3,533,154
Project Type:
A Acquisition
P Master Planning
D Development - New
R Replacement / Upgrade
Page 38
Packet Pg. 55
REET II Fund 125
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
REET II(Fund 125)Expenditures
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
P4
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan)
$ 273,200
$ 273,200
D16
Elm Street Park (Nature Playground)
$ 84,400
$ 84,400
D17
Elm Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ 84,400
$ 84,400
R2
Johnson Property (Demo & Secure Site)
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
P5
lJohnson Property (Master Plan)
$ 82,000
$ 82,000
R12
Maplewood Hill Park (Playground Replacement)
$ 144,900
$ 144,900
D5
Mathay Ballinger Park (Paved Loop Pathway)
$ 53,000
$ 53,000
D7
Mathay Ballinger Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
P2
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Master Plan)
$ 79,600
$ 79,600
P6
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Master Plan)
$ 82,000
$ 82,000
P7
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Master Plan)
$ 84,400
$ 84,400
R7
Olympic Beach Park (Restroom Upgrade)
$ 53,000
$ 53,000
D10
Pine Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ 79,600
$ 79,600
D11
Pine Street Park (Paved Connecting Pathway)
$ 58,300
$ 58,300
D12
Pine Street Park (Canopy Shade Trees)
$ 26,500
$ 26,500
R16
Seaview Park (Restroom Replacement)
$ 417,900
$ 417,900
R8
Sierra Park (Playground Replacement)
$ 185,700
$ 185,700
P3
lWaterfront Walkway Design Completion
$ 515,000
$ 515,000
R11
Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation
$ 546,400
$ 546,400
R9
Yost Park (Tennis Court Resurface)
$ 74,300
$ 74,300
R4
Yost Park (Trail, Bridge & Boardwalk Repairs)
$ 80,000
$ 80,000
R6
Yost Park (Playground Replacement)
$ 257,500
$ 257,500
R13
Playground Replacement / Inclusive Upgrades
$ 197,000
$ 202,900
$ 209,000
$ 608,900
R10
Signage and Wayfinding
$ 51,500
1
1
1
1
1 $ 51,500
R17
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,000
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures
$ 1,035,500
$ 1,653,500
$ 1,578,500
$ 900,200
$ 1,070,800
$ 659,000
$ 6,897,500
REET II(Fund 125)Revenue
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 10,000,000
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$10,000,000
REET II (Fund 125) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 75,328
$
1,039,828
$ 1,386,328
$ 1,307,828
$ 1,907,628
$
2,336,828
(D) Revenue
$ 2,000,000
$
2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$
1,500,000
(C) Expenditures
$ 1,035,500
$
1,653,500
$ 1,578,500
$ 900,200
$ 1,070,800
$
659,000
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 1,039,828
$
1,386,328
$ 1,307,828
$ 1,907,628
$ 2,336,828
$
3,177,828
c
d
E
d
O
L
E
is
.Q
V
c
Id
a
LL
U_
c
to
d
U)
T
v
to
LL
r
.Q
IC
U
ao
N
O
N
ch
N
O
N
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
LL
U
I
a_
U
Y
L
to
a
c
CD
E
t
U
R
a
Page 39 Packet Pg. 56
REET I Fund 126
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
REET I(Fund 126)Expenditures
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
Al
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition)
$ 8,741,800
$ 8,741,800
A5
Interurban Trail (Expansion/Acquisition)
$ 895,585
$ 895,585
A2
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Acquisition)
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
A3
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Acquisition)
$ 1,545,000
$ 1,545,000
A4
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Acquisition)
$ 2,185,500
$ 2,185,500
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,545,000
$ 10,927,300
$
$
$ 895,585
$14,867,885
REET I(Fund 126)Revenue
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
REET I (Fund 126) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 900,000
$ (400,000)
$ (1,745,000)
$(12,472,300)
$(12,272,300)
$(12,072,300)
(D) Revenue
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
(C) Expenditures
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,545,000
$ 10,927,300
$ -
$ -
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
1 $ (400,000)
$ (1,745,000)
$(12,472,300)
$(12,272,300)
$(12,072,300)
$(11,872,300)
c
d
E
d
O
L
E
U
C
O
a
LL
U_
C
M
d
a�
M
LL
r
M
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
LL
U
I
a_
U
L
a
c
as
E
a
Page 40 Packet Pg. 57
TREE Fund 143
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
TREE (Fund 143)Expenditures
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
Park and Open Space Acquisition Program
$
(C) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures
$ -
$
$ -
$
$
$
$
TREE (Fund 143)Revenue
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
Tree - Fund 143
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 1,194,000
(D) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Revenue
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 199,000
$ 1,194,000
TREE (Fund 143) 6-Year Overview
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 199,000
$
398,000
$ 597,000
$
796,000
$
995,000
$ 1,194,000
(D) Revenue
$ 199,000
$
199,000
$ 199,000
$
199,000
$
199,000
$ 199,000
(C) Expenditures
$ -
$
-
$
$
-
$
$ -
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 398,000
1 $
597,000
1 $ 796,000
1 $
995,000
1 $
1,194,000
1 $ 1,393,000
c
d
E
d
O
L
E
.Q
V
c
Id
a
LL
U_
c
R
d
a�
v
to
LL
is
r
.Q
to
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
LL
U
I
a_
U
L
a
c
CD
E
U
a
Page 41 Packet Pg. 58
CEMETERY Trust Fund 137
6.A.a
Costs inflated at 3% per year
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Expenditures
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
D8
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
$ 159,100
$ 159,100
Repair & Maintenance
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 150,000
(C) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust(Fund 137) Expenditures
$ 25,000
$ 184,100
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 309,100
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
6-Year Total
Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Investment Interest (@5%)
$ 55,971
$ 58,270
$ 52,728
$ 54,864
$ 57,108
$ 59,463
$ 338,404
Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Sales Revenue
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 90,000
(D) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue
$ 70,971
$ 73,270
$ 67,728
$ 69,864
$ 72,108
$ 74,463
$ 428,404
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) 6-Year Overview
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 1,119,420
$ 1,165,391
$ 1,054,561
$ 1,097,289
$ 1,142,153
$ 1,189,261
(D) Revenue
$ 70,971
$ 73,270
$ 67,728
$ 69,864
$ 72,108
$ 74,463
(C)Expenditures
$ 25,000
$ 184,100
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 1,165,391
$ 1,054,561
$ 1,097,289
$ 1,142,153
$ 1,189,261
$ 1,238,724
c
m
E
d
O
L
E
.Q
U
c
Id
a
LL
U_
c
R
IL
U)
T
v
M
LL
r
.Q
IC
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
LL
U
I
a_
U
L
a
c
CD
E
U
a
Page 42 Packet Pg. 59
6.A.a
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023)
PROJECTS ADDED
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
DESCRIPTION
Parks
Johnson Property Demolition & Master Plan
Demolition scheduled for 2023, master plan in 2025
Parks
Meadowdale Pla fields
Renovations consistent with City of Lynnwood ILA
Parks
Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements
Addition of paved loop pathway, permanent restrooms, shelter and picnic tables - 2023
Parks
lYost Park & Pool Improvements
Playground replacement (2023); Tennis court resurface, pool upgrades, trail/bridge repairs
Parks
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - 2024
Parks
Olympic Beach Park Improvements
Renovation of existing restroom - 2024
Parks
Pine Street Park Improvements
Addition of small shelter, picnic tables, shade trees and paved pathway - 2024 project
Parks
Neighborhood Park SE1
X
Master plan and construction of new park in SE Edmonds
Parks
Maplewood Hill Park
Playground replacement - 2025
Parks
Elm Street Park Improvements
Addition of nature playground, small shelter, picnic tables and habitat restoration - 2026
Parks
Neighborhood Park SR99
Master Plan and construction of new park along SR99
Parks
Neighborhood Park SE2
X
Master Plan and construction of new park in SE Edmonds
Parks
Seaview Park Improvements
Replacement of permanent restroom and ADA upgrades - 2027
Parks
Yost Pool Replacement
I X
Replacement of existing pool - 2028
Parks
I Si na a and Wayfinding
I
I Standardization of park si na e - 2024
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023)
PROJECTS REMOVED
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
DESCRIPTION
Parks
Civic Center Playfield
X
2022 project
Parks
Marina Beach Park Improvements
X
Council declined grant and put project on hold
Parks
Yost Pool Repair (plaster)
2022 project - completed
Parks
Community Park & Athletic Complex - Phase II
X
Not identified as priority in 2022 PROS plan
Parks
I Beautification Program
I Program moved to Gift Catalog based on large donation
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023)
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
CHANGE
Parks
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor
Moved back one year from 2025 to 2026
Parks
Waterfront Walkway Completion
lExpanded
Expense increase $84,500 due to inflation
Parks
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration
X
Estimate for Master Plan added, acquisition and restoration expense still TBD
Parks
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
X
Cost estimate for design and construction added
Parks
I Parkland Acquisition
I X
to include 3 neighborhood parks, marsh and Interurban trail
c
m
E
a�
O
L
0.
E
�a
.Q
�a
V
c
�a
a
LL
U_
c
R
(L
U)
T
.v
M
LL
�a
r
.Q
M
U
0
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
0
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a
LL
U
I
a_
U
a
c
CD
E
U
a
Page 43 Packet Pg. 60
lk
ojoppr,
a
O
CM
``
cm 5
F._
V
cu
'Packet Pg. 61
6.A.b
TRANSPORTATI
FACILITIES & W
TRANSPORT
UTILITY PROJECT MAP.............................................................iii
PROJECT MAP............................................................................iv
...................................................................................1
AOJECTS............................................................4
ALYSIS...........................................................................12
NON -MO SPORTATI PROJECTS
.........................................36
FERRYCTS........ ......................................................................61
TRAFFICALMING ....................................................................
63
TRAFFIC PLANNING. .........................................
............................... 65
GREEN STREETS........ .......................... ..................................68
WATER............................ ............ ...............
............................... 71
STORMWATER...................... .........
....................................... 76
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATI
D PROJECTS .....78
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN PROJECTS .............. ....................
.......... 0
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJ .............
......................
ANNUALLY FUNDED PROJECTS ................ ..........
...... ...............88
COMPLIANCE RELATED PROJECTS ....................
..................... .......91
SEWER............................................................................................................................ 93
FACILITIES.....................................................................................................................100
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.........................................................................126
CIP-CFP COMPARISON(2023-2028)....................................................................131,
. •
Packet Pg. 62
6.A.b
Lei
JVT-42 PWT-07
•
PWT-65
F7 PWT-04
LI
PWT-51 �—MI i PWT-36 _m
D~01 �WME �
�1
Wiir—-PWT-20
PWT-21
PWT-�2.9
PWT-30
PWT-47
PWT-06
WT-28� P: T 7
PWT-24
•
PWT-03
PWT-17 MMOM
W
I
PWT-0/WT-12
-35 ,JO
• �-16
P,W PWT-19
P, 1
PWT-25
PWT-15 �
PWT-08
\20
WTIPWT-13 PWT-14
_ PWT-3`
PWT-23 PWTi64 PWT-5
•
PWT-06 lmm PWS-1-
rlgj
P7m •
�PWD-06
PWT-26 P
NWT-1•
* Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 0 lo I Packet Pg. 63
A t �o Sprague St Sprague
SAWN ` ?//,� °ds � ;WF-01
ri • /�•_
4 , • I - �X- MI Edmonds St_
�WF-03_ 0 Z r11;11111 <4 11
Belli St
r
MaO F-10 P`WiF U9 : a low 1 �f j^ r r J
Mill•
r
7■+yMTO
o ° '5 PWF-13
ra; O ' �i �
w
Maple St
3
0O�
•
�i
�M
CO•
°. Alder!St
.L
n I
0
���
IM
Ider St
0
w
�� WR T
■
Walnut St
s
r
■I
MAIM MI
Inut
MIN
PWF-09 G'W■
F04r-fm
PWF-03 •PWI
PWF-10 10
° ' 8Fuff,@,F-23;+
•u • .0 PIWF 1id
1,1
■■PWF-1
MEN C
IW
It
Re
"i
AL
AW .t j
' r
14Pr�
o
r '
'� w s
m
6.A.b
•l f
Packet Pg. 65
IL
6.A.b
Transportation Projects
#
CFP
PRO.
DP
3
2024
2025
2026
2027
20Y8
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL Proj
#
(2023-2028)
(2029-43)
Cost
Preservation / Maintenance Projects -
PWT-01
Annual Street Preservation Progra 64 $1,500,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$1,650,000
$1,650,000
$1,650,000
$9,450,000
$24,750,000
$34,200,0
PWT-03
76th Ave. W Overlay from 196 Olympic View Dr. 65 $15,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$15,000
$0
$15,0
PWT-04
Main St. Overlay from 6th ve. 69 $157,000
$780,500
$0
$0
$0
$0
$937,500
$0
$937,5
PWT-05
Puget Dr. @ OVD Sig s $0
$0
$0
$86,000
$480,000
$0
$566,000
$0
$566,0
PWT-06
Signal Upgrades - 100th h St. SW $0
$0
$0
$160,000
$750,000
$0
$910,000
$0
$910,0
PWT-07
PWT-61
Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrad bill, $0
Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th Lalbot Rdqmnkh�$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$106,000
$0
$371,0001
$0
$477,000
$0
$477,0
$200,000
$1,300,000
$1,500,000
$0
$1,500,0
Safety/ Capacity Analysis
Q
U
C
a
ILL
U
C
tC
IL
PWT-08
X
228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W Corridor
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$1,862,000
$6,360,000
$9,222,000
$0
$9,222,0 ,
PWT-09
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 66
$2,64
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,646,000
$0
$2,646,0 ;
PWT-10
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 3
$2,01
$2,608,000
$1,500,000
$15,000,000
$11,752,000
$0
$32,870,000
$0
$32,870,0
PWT-11
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 4
$2,700,000
$4,348,000
$2,262,000
$16,434,000
$16,000,000
$42,484,000
$0
$42,484,0
PWT-12
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 5
0
$0
$0
$2,080,000
$4,964,000
$0
$7,044,000
$37,971,000
$45,015,0
PWT-13
I X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 6
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,217,000
$20,217,0
PWT-14
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 7
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$38,142,000
$38,142,0
PWT-15
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 8
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$35,242,000
$35,242,0
PWT-16
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 9
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,072,000
$20,072,0
PWT-17
X
SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements
$0
$0
$255,000
$230,000
$765,000
$1,250,000
$0
$1,250,0
PWT-18
X
Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements
$0
$0
$190,000
$1,060,000
$0
$1,250,000
$0
$1,250,0
PWT-19
I X
76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW - Intersection Improvements
11,
$800,00
$462,750
$6,673,0001
$0
$0
$8,647,000
$0
$8,647,0
PWT-20
SR-104 Adaptive System - 236th to 226th
7
$243,440
$1,984,000
A.$0
$0
$2,227,440
$0
$2,227,4
PWT-21
X
SR-104 @100th Ave W. Intersection Improvements
$0
$0
$987,000
$0
$1,157,000
$0
$1,157,0
PWT-22
X
SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements
$0
$0
0
478,000
$0
$563,000
$0
$563,0
PWT-23
X
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements
$0
$
14,000
,000
$0
$1,433,000
$0
$1,433,0 C
PWT-24
X
Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements
$0
0
$0
$0
$0
$1,266,000
$1,266,0 CC
PWT-25
X
84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th St. SW)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$16,622,000
$16,622,0 C
PWT-26
X
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
$0
$3,231,000
$3,231,0 (C'
PWT-27
X
I Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW Intersection Improvements
$0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
$0
$671,000
$671,0 C
PWT-28
175th St SW Slope Repair
$0
$0
$1,
$0
0
$1,000'000
$0
$1,000,0
PWT-63
2023 Guardrail Program
$20,190
$
$0
Irr
$0
$20,190
$0
i
$20,1 1
PWT-59
2023 Traffic Signal and Safety Upgrades
$30,280
$0
$0
$0
$0
$30,980
$0
$30,2
Non -motorized transportation projects
1
J
PWT-29
X
232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-104
$0
$0
$0
$0
$276,000 00
$
$0
$1,802,0
PWT-30
X
236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W
$0
$0
$0
$286,000
$1,642,000 $0
$1,92
$0
$1,928,0
PWT-31
X
236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,831,000
$1,831,0 j
PWT-32
X
84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW
$0
$0
$0
$160,000
$0
$840,000
$0
$840,0 ;
PWT-33
X
80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
0 $2,500,000
$3,000,000
$0
$3,000,0 1
PWT-34
X
80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
$0
$0
$0
$633,000
4,000 $0
$3,007,000
$0
1
$3,007,0
PWT-35
I X
1218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
1
1 $0
$0
$0
$0
$256,000 $1,431,000
$1,687,000
$0
s
$1,687,0
PWT-36
X
I Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave S
$0
$0
$0
$281,000
$0
$0
$281,000
$0
$281,0
PWT-37
X
216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W
$0
$0
$0
$213,000
$0
$0
$213,000
$0
$213,000
N
m
y+
0
tC
LL
CL
ci
O
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
Packet Pg. 66
2023-2028 CIP-CFP VIDA
6.A.b
-[-I
DP 2023 2024 2028 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Proj DIP 20231 2024# (2023-2028) (2029-43) Cost
PWT-39
X
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project 71
$1,771,847
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,771,847
$0
$1,771,8
PWT-40
X
Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. SW
95th PI. W Walkway from 224t 20th St. SW
$0
$0
$0
$213,000
$213,000
$2,438,000
$2,864,000
$0
$2,864,0
PWT-41
X
$0
$0
$0
$127,000
$710,000
$0
$837,000
$0
$837,0
PWT-42
X
Railroad St. Walkway from o Main St. / SR-104
$0
$0
$0
$180,000
$800,000
$0
$980,000
$0
$980,0
PWT-43
X
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. rized Trans Improvements
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$1,600,000
$2,000,000
$0
$2,000,0
PWT-44
X
Downtown Lighting Impro
$0
$0
$0
$300,000
$1,200,000
$0
$1,500,0001
$0
$1,500,0
PWT-45
PWT-46
X
X
SR-104 Walkway: HAWK to P rom SR-104 to 9th
191st St. SW Walkway from 80th th Ave. W
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$265,000
$0
$265,000
$0
$2,650,000
$0
$3,180,000
$0
$0
$678,000
$3,180,0
$678,0
PWT-47
PWT-48
X
X
104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane Walk Ave. W
80th Ave. W Walkway from 21811
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,060,000
$324,000
$1,060,0
$324,0
PWT-49
X
84th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$328,000
$328,0
PWT-50
X
238th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
$0
$0
$0
$187,000
$1,098,000
$1,285,000
$0
$1,285,0
PWT-55
X
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
$9 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$901,974
$0
$901,9
PWT-60
2023 Pedestrian Safety Program
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$80,780
$0
$80,7
PWT-62
Citywide Lighting Study NIF00
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$60,000
$0
$60,0
PWT-51 I X IFerry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St.
Traffic
PWT-52
PWT-53 I I Citywide ADA Transition Plan
PWT-54 I Transportation Plan Update
caa. sfaat.
CL
M
V
C
a
LL
U
C
d
N
d
y+
LL
.Q
W
L)
$0
$380,000
$0
$380,0 00
N
O
N
$18,000
$123,130
$0
$123,1 M
N
O
C14
$0
$105,000
$0
$105,0
$0
$170,000
$0
$170,0 LL
9
C
PWT-64
I
Green Streets 236th St SW - 84th Ave W to Highway 99
72
$219,717
$3, $0
$ $0
$0
$3,719,717
$0
$3,719,7
PWT-65
Green Streets Dayton St- Highway 104 to 2nd Ave S
72
$78,027
$1,600,00
$0 $0
$0
$1,678,027
$0
$1,678,0 C
Total Projects $11,388,635 $ 00
$11,6
$35,631,000 $ $38,407,000 $160,093,885 $202,405,000 $362,498,8
C
C
Funding Source
2023
2027
-128
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL 0
(2023-2028)
(2029-43)
C
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal revenue
$670,000
$0
$1 $150,000
$1,120,000
$2,250,000
1
$3,370,0 j
REET Fund 125
$1,277,862
$656,000
$600,000
$800,00 $500,000
$50
$4,333,862
$7,500,000
$11,833,8
REET Fund 126
$1,169,492
$834,000
$1,322,000
$1,383,000
$518,000
$518
,744,492
$7,500,000
$13,244,4
Transportation Impact Fees
$673,500
$377,000
$2,098,000
$727,000
$0
,500
$0
$3,875,5
General Fund
$0
$645,000
$540,000
$500,000
$500,000
0
$7,500,000
$10,185,0 C
Water Utility Fund 421
$30,000
$50,000
$27,000
$635,000
$400,000
0,000
$1,4
$0
$1,442,0 y
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$349,927
$0
$0
$0
$0
$349,927
$0
$349,9 t
1
Sewer Utility Fund 423
$0
$30,000
$30,000
$100,000
$IF
$150,000
$490,000
$0
$490,0
Federal Grants
$1,083,925
$2,254,500
$1,798,150
$1,670,000
$0
$6,806,575
$0
$6,806,5
State Grants
$4,586,685
$3,665,000
$1,613,600
$14,765,000
1,000
$0
$31,011,285
$0
$31,011,2
Other Sound Transit Grant
$1,249,500
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,249,500
$0
$1,249,5 4
ARPA
$297,744
$1,113,006
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,410,750
$0
$1,410,7
Unsecured Funding
$0
$2,386,9941
$3,584,0001
$14,901,0001
$42,414,0001
$36,289,000
$99,574,994
$177,655,000
$277,229,994
Total Revenue $11,388,635 $12,011,500 $11,612,750 $35,631,000 $51,043,000 $38,407,000 $160,093,885 $202,405,000 $362,498 885
Pg. 67 Packet
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 3
6.A.b
J 'la 36*13 ',TS-�1 I E e
:Jae
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 68
Project Description
Annual pavement preservation progra maintain City streets.
Project Benefit
Maintains the City's pavement infras re an a ne
steets.
Estimated Project Cost
$1,500,000 to $1,650,000/ year
rger capital investment to rebuild City
Design $50,000 $50,000- $50, $60, $60,000 $ 00 $900,00
a
Right of Way
Construction $1,450,000 $1,450,000 $1,45 00 $1,590,000 $ 90,000 $1,590'0 3,850,00
Expense Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,00 0,00,
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal $500,000 $150,000 $150,000 $15 $ , 0 i
REET Fund 125 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $7,50 i
REET Fund 126 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 000 $7,500,00
Transportation Impact Fees i
General Fund $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $5,fr $500,000 $7,500,00
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $24,750,00,
Packet Pg. 69
2023-2028 CIP—CFP v0.4
1841h St SW
tTh PI SN! - i
1861h St SW y Q
q 187th St SW
m Jill
3 i187t1)P1 SN1
W 188th St SW ¢
ac
a, °p
189th PI S
<190th St SW" SOP
1v1GPIs�:: 797s1F``-'�
0 191st St SW
192nd St SW Icp _S, .,
10 80tb 192nd Pi SW
� w
Q1 D 193rd PI SW
r
¢
194th St
9Sth St
'h St SW ^4\c - -196T
Project Description
Pavement overlay of 76th Ave. W from
addition of a bike lane for the northbo
Lynnwood, since the west half of the
Project Benefit
I I." y%3rd-PI-SW--d
Q a 3 y
� ¢ � 1I85thPP.SW t
lr'icy ¢ y 86th St SW
" m r r a I �a6sh-st
rrsW
LLI
187th-PI=SW:
�
--t �-1aft =PI:SW F_188TH-ST-SW �
Penny Ln !.
�c 189th=Pi- �
1 B9t h PI sw LO'789th AI
r
¢--190th-5t-5W�
Tssw� r:➢.140th.St-SW i
O
n191st PI, SW, ( 1
w I �1.91st-St-SW
w Lf W
�
1'.d St Sa�/e_ �
192nd - P1 SW
_ �3 192nd P_I=BW
Q � W Park:lrya9
yy
Y � d
� 193rd:Pf S� � 7—
a-193rSt =SW-_ Ld St SW
SW 19q�h PI SW n 194thStSw-
s N
a
:h St. SW to Olympic View
iovement. This is a
is in the City o t
Improve pavement condition and upgrade'RPM-strian cIi
existing southbound bike lane, the project may add a new
Transportation Comprehensive Plan.
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REST Fund 125
REST Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Other
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$11,685
$15,000
with pedestrian curb ramp upgrades and
funded by the Cities of Edmonds and
he east half is in the City of Lynnwood.
In addition to the
in the City's
2023-2028 CIP-Cl v0.4 6
Packet Pg. 70
Edmonds Police and Civic Playfield
Municipal Court
Veteran's Z
Plaza
MAI
Christian
Science
Church
z
z
-
W c
Bell St
St s
a
a'Bell
r`
00
is
0
i
c
Yo
-Isle
Frances Anderson
Pa c
rary
Anderson Center
(A c
I
enter Field
LU
y
>
> i
Dayton Si
_ Ytal.
i
-
MaplA.
Project Description
qr'
Pavement overlay along Main St. from
be funded with a federal grant (funds
Project Benefit
Improve pavement conditions and ped
Estimated Project Cost
$937,500
'e. to 8th Ave. with pedest ian curb ramps upgrades. The project will
le in 2023) and City�j local match.
Design
$157,000
Right of Way
Construction
$780,500
Expense Total
$157,000
$780,500
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
$31,400
$156,000
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
$125,600
$624,500
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$157,000
$780,500
rb ramps) on this segment of Main Street
Packet Pg. 71
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 7
z
�r'-
cr QQ'
PUGET DR _
onds
ktary
a'
u Excelsior PI
n
E
7,
O
Project Description
The project consists of a complete sign uilt, with the removal of al vehicle head currently on Spam wire and
conversion to standard traffic signal p ith mast arms. Vehic n will also be upgraded as part of this
project.
Project Benefit
This upgrade will provide safer roadway co Fnwires. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that
Estimated Project Cost
$566,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
ads aren't
detected.
$86,000
He handing on those
$480,000
$86,000 $480,000
$86,000 $480,000
$86,000 $480,000
z
a
N
A
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 8
Packet Pg. 72
Fait[
Com
Chur
a� �
Project Description_
Install new traffic signal and vehicle d
Project Benefit
The existing traffic signal is near the
Estimated Project Cost
$910,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
� � I � V
fII W � � �
23,th '°I SW
I =
l0i
c`
l�
1. 238th St SW
n system.
its a rvice I
$160,000
$160,000 $750,000
$160,000 $750,000
237th PI
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 9
Packet Pg. 73
B racketts
Landing �a
South .\'3
Railroad
Station
Project Description -
Install new traffic signal and vehicle d
Project Benefit
The existing traffic signal is near the
Estimated Project Cost
$477,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
Post
am Office
IT
a
n system.
its a rvice I
Edmonds Polic
7st and Municipal t
p Court I
Veteran'
Edmonds Centennial Paz
City Hall Plaza Bell
AO
I
N
Fountain MAIN ST
202 2028 2029-4
$371,
;,106,000 $371,0b,
lArA
$106,000 $371,000
$106,000 $371,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 74
10
Project Description_
Pavement overlay along Olympic View
upgrades.
Project Benefit �
Improve pavement condition and imp
Estimated Project Cost
$1, 500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
i
m 196th St. SW / SR-524 taTalbot Road, along with ADA curb ramp
all abilities.
$1,300,000
$200,000 $1,300,000
$100,000 $300,000
$100,000 $300,000
$700,000
$200,000 $1,300,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 11
Packet Pg. 75
4
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 12
S',. ; . t5Vt:KANC.t L
'J Si
. 22'f Lf7 JL _"1'Y _ _ _
r■ *.- w•�t•t'.b• �:'��Il�� w� i 2241K 5t=5W-
224th' I sw r'
dj� ■• r. • i �r at •!L. i 2+4t;:Swa ■ Lx r J- t; I• a� fi4I�
I+ w�♦ • w .`w 4. L h 7�aI �01 : " ■' I + r 1f 'ri 1 $' I■ .'�' R
Co
Q ��� III f��l, ■ 0_4 IL 7 'tI zzstT�sw any^wsw , A I� r,�rw...3, . .6 ..-
i n ■. .
225
r 226th St SW �. 226th St SW_a_ I �!
y 1 Lm ✓a ■ 1 I' r=;�. 3 Y pfy �i:r„��r oI p1
.'*LJI La ■ ilLc I�m1,• 1 q
1 �♦
o==� i 4„ *' �. w t. t[W { r"h w■ "! �' pl sw 3
rn R ' * wr f0 An w -a.r •. !► r
y+ 5 1 . 21' E'�lll i .'•• F. '�..
a 110 A �y� ; 1-ar • J AA
PIL16 CIO
m
d .10
m
TI
232nd St SW J WiIIu■ > ■71
L,_1
Project Description Wr
Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 9 I. W to three lanes (with
gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. -.A
Project Benefit
NTH ST SV
r. ti
S� i. I.i
�2l9th� .�
_
:� a ,.
~.
w
a
'�.wF■iM'r � 1 r � �. �'i�
�
L3 30th Sty W - ° .230th St SWn
_ �•,3
• Vr
a. a'ILI
Q���r�
_II
13
_JJI`
two-way left turn lane), with curb and
This project would improve active transj5 traffic s along this corridor. Community Transit
will evaluate the possibility of creating a n st-west ut g 228th St. SW this project moves
forward (connecting Edmonds Transit Station to Mountlake ransit Statio
Estimated Project Cost
$9,222,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000 'W2,000
$1,000,000
$ 6,
$1,000,000 $1,862,000 $6,
$1,000,000 $1,862,000 $6,360,000
$1,000,000 $1,862,000 $6,360,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
13
Packet Pg. 77
m
a
' tl:
� K
.i .• F r
22OTH+ST�SW.
o„228TH
ST S
— - l ST
Project Description e 0
Installation of raised landscaped media ng Highway 99 corridor
of "Gateway" signage on both ends of orridor, and anew p
The project is funded from state fund ided by the Co
as REET funds.
Project Benefit
The conversion of the center two-way lef0
t turn lane to a la
along this Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an Ave
day. The new HAWK signal will provide a signalized pedestri s
238th St and 228th St.
Estimated Project Cost
$9,891,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$2,646,000
Expense Total
$2,646,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
$81,000
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
$2,565,000
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$2,646,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
14
r .:LLP
���
11rr1Ilrrg
JLJlinl�
L LU
LU
l�L�
--�I
W _ J[LLL�111
� ��
244th St. SW to 212th St. SW, addition
�igt�AK signal just north of 234th St. SW
Transportation program, as well
-aised media
My Traffi
ng bet
corridor safety
) vehicles per
tic signals at
Packet Pg. 78
/40
238th Si SW
_ 238TH ST SW � 238th St SW
m w
ui
3
5
2401
�O `24Dth St -SW �L_J 240th St SW
-�
9 ,
co
79M Q�
240th P! SW241st St SN
cL _
{ �
coa 242nd St S
` // F y
��
242nd St SW—
—
a
242nd PI S4V
m w
ti'�gway �nfj-.�
55 of*ramp mp - -
o
- - - -
r-
243rd PI S
N ;
�`S'WAY
TSW�
_LAKE_BALLINGER-WAY
----AN
iAKGEi
i
Project Description_
The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits a om 244th St SW to 238th jS SW. The project will add a planter strip
on both sides of the street, new street ing, improved storm ' ies, targeted utility replacements,
potential undergrounding of overhea ties, landscapi scape treatments. The Design and right
of way phases are funded through se Con gton
Project Benefit
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this f the Hwy 99_
Estimated Project Cost
$32,870,000
Design
$1,775,000
$1,425,000
$5W00 _
Right of Way
$235,000
$1,183,000
$1,000,000
Construction
$15,000,000 $11,752,000
Expense Total
$2,010,000
$2,608,000
$1,500,000 $15,000,000 $11,752,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Water Utility Fund 421
$20,000
$20,000 $135,000 $100,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Sewer Utility Fund 423
$10,000
$10,000 $10,000 $30,000
Federal Grants
State Grants
$2,010,000
$2,578,000
$1,470,000 $14,765,000 $6,381,000
Unsecured Funding
$5,241,000
Funding Source Total
$2,010,000
$2,608,000
$1,500,000 $14,910,000 $11,752,000
Packet Pg. 79
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 15
,A * a� 7 j i * * ■
a y,
o
m* r fir
do VIP
t sw
"724*thSjtSw a
Project Description_
tit
Ist Pi SW
... W
o�
o W
Y
W�
A
The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits a om 224th St SW to app
project will add a planter strip on both s of the streenewtargeted utility replacements, potenti dergroundintreatments. The intersection of High 9 and 2of service. The Design and right of wa a
federal grant and local traffic impact fees.
Project Benefit
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, E
Estimated Project Cost .
$42,534,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Water Utility Fund 421
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Sewer Utility Fund 423
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
ately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW. The
g, improved stormwater facilities,
Ies, landscaping and other softscape
d to add capacity and improve the level
red Connecting Washington funds, a
$740,000 $2,200,000 $1,348,000 $162,000
$500,000 $3,000,000 $2,100,000
$16,434,000 $
$740,000 $2,700,000 $4,348,000 $2,262,000 $16,434,00A
be improved.
$704,000 $565,000
$365,000 $269,000 $1,917,000 $727,000
$40,000 $40,000 $300,000 $300,000
$20,000 $20,000 $150,000 $150,000
$375,000 $1,284,000 $1,523,400 $970,000
$1,087,000 $143,600
$15,984,000 $15,550,000
$740,000 $2,700,000 $4,348,000 $2,262,000 $16,434,000 $16,00 packet Pg. 80
16
sw
276th St SW
212TH ST SW'�_
20 _ j
�21bth St SW 216thA i
Project Description -
Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212 SW, the project will add
new street lighting, better stormwater agement, targeted u '
7
overhead utilities, landscaping and of ftscape treat
Project Benefit
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user expert . In addi to
along the corridor.
Estimated Project Cost
$45,015,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
nter strip on both sides of the street,
fements, potential undergrounding of
the area as being in Edmonds.
omic develojiftent will be improved
$1,580,000 $W3,000
$500,000 $2,951,000
$2,080,000 $4,964,000
$2,080,000 $4,964,000
$2,080,000 $4,964,000
1,000,00 [
$37
$37,971,00 I
$37,971,00
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 17
Packet Pg. 81
23t
I
Madrona Ln
I 1-�I:111110311111031Z
Project Description
Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to
new street lighting, better stormwat
overhead utilities, landscaping and c
Wm
Project Benefit
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user
along the corridor.
Estimated Project Cost
$20,217,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
=KAN(—t =
a
234th St SW
C�
m
a'
r-
236th St SW
4
I a
a
a'
o —
CO
238th St SW.:
SW, the project will add a lanter strip on both sides of the street,
;ement, targeted u ' ' ements, potential undergrounding of
scape treat the area as being in Edmonds.
In add
omic develojiftent would be improved
2,146,00 [
$ 20, 217,00 I
$20,217,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 82
18
,e
228_Tti ST 5WIL
m -
4ad am am
J a 1 . 229th St -SW'- F RRR
00
IF
.� .� 1 y� 1 1! a 1 � ■ i
in
�230th St SW
230th St SW
su.ay ✓
, ■
11
237
0
StIS Qy Ca'i
Zn
-11. 44 �1 .ZITplop
iy r
vJ� 0i
Q
�11��1l�
.R t
■ _
232nd St
SI"J
,.r0.
i� til
—' 234
Project Descriptio"
Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 2
new street lighting, better stormwat(
overhead utilities, landscaping and o1
Project Benefit
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user ex
along the corridor.
Estimated Project Cost
$38,142, 000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
Q�
234th Si SW
I
229th St SW� 4
v ,230th S1 SW
�W w
� S
QJ i►1
Q b �
0
K
A
SW, the project wi"the
nter strip on both sides of the street,
;ement, targeted uements, potential undergrounding of
scape treat area as being in Edmonds.
In add
omic develojiftent would be improved
$38,142,00
$38,142,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 19
Packet Pg. 83
9611
■�'��
a ds
225tha Pf SW
■
4226th�_%r_§e� Svs
-0 dF!n" y gr oil L—
224th St SW ' 224th St
e ■ Q ■ ■
�% �3: -M�
Pi SWc,
Project Descriptio"
Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 2
new street lighting, better stormwat(
overhead utilities, landscaping and of
Wm
Project Benefit
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user i
along the corridor.
Estimated Project Cost
$35,242,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
w
224thT St SW
C
N
a n
a
r
sue'
EDMONDS ccr
WOUNTLAKE
0 226TH PL SW
r
3
N
SW, the project wi"the
nter strip on both sides of the street,
;ement, targeted uements, potential undergrounding of
scape treat area as being in Edmonds.
In add
omic deve
t would be improved
3,596,00 1
$ 35, 242,00
$35,242,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
20
Packet Pg. 84
i St SW
ESPERANCE
Project Description_
Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500
strip on both sides of the street, new s
replacements, potential underground
identify the area as being in Edmond
s r
SW
north of 220th St. SW to 2
lighting, better stor
overhead utili w-9
Project Benefit _ ,
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In additio
along the corridor.
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
6th St
A
h St. SW, the project will add a planter
nagement, targeted utility
and other softscape treatments to
would be improved
$20,072,00
$20,072,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 21
Packet Pg. 85
PU D
Sub
Statig
Maplewood
Hill Park
Project Description
Install traffic signal at the intersection
Plan indicated that restricting northbo
through movements) would also addr
alternative as one concluded by cons
implemented as an alternate solution,
LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D).
Transportation Plan.
W
a
► 00
6th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W
ind southbound traff'
e deficiency i
i n 2007 of r
ution un
Project Benefit
.'"
Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the inte
increase the delay along 196th St. SW.
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
s
v
Seventh Day Q
Adventist
Church
co
196TH ST SW
e modeling in the 2009 Transportation
urn -only (prohibiting left -turn and
cation through 2025. This is same
ended by City Council. This could be
ffic signal warrants are met. The existing
e Roadway Pro
,kct Priority in the 2015
$255,000 $230,000
$255,000 $230,000
NC
S
$765,000
$765 ^
Packet Pg. 86
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
22
Project Description_
Installation of a traffic signal or min
2015 Transportation Plan.
Project Benefit
The existing intersection is stop-controR
(below the City's concurrency standards
delay to LOS B.
Estimated Project Cost
$1,250,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
MAIN St7W-
W
> Yost Park
a
St
0% Dayton Sf
bout. The project ranked Uin the Roadway Project Priority of the
es and rojected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F
The ins onffraffic signal wgd&improve the intersection
$190,000
$1,060,000
$190,000 $1,060,000
$190,000 $1,060,000
$190,000 $1,060,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 23
Packet Pg. 87
U
m
a
WINCO
219th St SW
YI
ti
r` 21919
2ST SW
0TH
- -- -- .
•• OP
- Q 7514
221st PI SW
STARBUCKS
Project Description -
Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left t ne and through / right tur lane. Add eastbound and westbound
dedicated left turn lanes with a protec ermitted phase. Prov' rn overlap for westbound movement
during southbound left turn phase. (A nal improvem r sidewalk, bike lanes, and various
utility improvements (including pote onversio utilit s to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT
PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation PI
Project Benefit
Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The proje OS in 2
LOS D. Improve active transportation conditions for pedestri d bicyck
Estimated Project Cost
$9,000,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Water Utility Fund 421
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
$556,250 $300,000 $64,750
$155,000 $500,000 $398,000
$6,673,000
$711,250 $800,000 $462,750 $6,673,000
$316,000
$308,500 $108,000 $181,000
$30,000 $30,000 $7,000 $500,000
$372,750 $346,000 $274,750
$ 6,173,000
$711,250 $800,000 $462,750 $6,673,000
24
from LOS F to
Packet Pg. 88
Aigonq,,l 226th St SV: �!5tt 5t SlyW
a r
228th St \
,,Dees=D��-
n �
�y ¢ p-
-a
r
� _ o
231 st St S�
Q
thus F
3 0
.NottingL' i
W
i
y
J
a
>
a
y
a
=
11=...d
C%
%9b PIS^;
W
a
2
M
C,
St SW - ---
u4-226th
`, CO
Co
+i:YL'1r. 1L_j a
_
'�7
228TH
ST SW,,,.,-
g#
�-i r■ A.A.
F
'w
i
2 h.St 2i.
7O
<
•r
J7.ArCO,
. ON
F[01 ■' a�} rrF-. iER
230th-St-
z231s` a
q `W��� 231'st St SW�ri r
r .
232nd St SW °
v� �,�
•■.i1■ �, is
a
232nd PISW.1
�r
,c�
1.
r _-� ��; , ji,
4: � ..:� -rE L•� A.
K7 IrL, a 'f
Holly Ln
=�+II
":'rl
Maple Ln pN■
2341h St SW °
y
""t z" S .
234th-t S
a
P.
Madrona Ln
N
1f
�Z236th St SW
236th St SW
236th�: '
V
i
Project Descriptio
.dW
Installation of an Adaptive System alon 104 from 236th St. SW to
along this stretch / spaced — % mile fro ch other). No signal
the existing traffic signals. (SR-104 @ St. SW, SR-10 0
100th Ave. W, and SR-104 @ 226th S ). Possib Itionl
traffic management center (TMC) at th u lity
bL Project iffl�
Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a curre
per day.
Estimated Project Cost 4
$2,394,000
and cA
th St. SW (total of five traffic signals
tion currently exists between any of
, SR-104 @ 95th PI. W, SR-104 @
is project may include addition of a
Lion of the Adaptive System to the TMC
rage Daily
Design
$243,440
Right of Way
Construction
$1,984,000
Expense Total
$243,440
$1,984,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
$32,865
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
$210,575
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$1,984,000
Funding Source Total
$243,440
$1,984,000
25,000 vehicles
Packet Pg. 89
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 25
QFC
PCC NATURAL
MARKET
Y
76 GA:
a
WALGREEN'S
j
PARKING
j
BANK
EDMONDS WAY''
a„e.
O O 00 W N 00 d' N O
Vi N O
W
co 00 00 co co rl- 1- P.-1-
BANK mmmm mmmmm
�Q } N N
CM
Q
IVAR'S
D
o
N
ARTELL'
O
�
a
;
y
Q
�
r
m
m
�
Project Description
Implement Westgate Circulation Accit
, install mid -block I
safety to access the driveways withinity to the intersect
potential addition of bike lanes. This was identifie
(completed in 2015).
Project B
X� 4
Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve
L Estimated Project Costy
$1,157,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve
striping of 100th Ave. W with the
..ompleted Streets Corridor Analysis
sportation
$170,000
$987,000
$170,000 $987,000
$170,000 $987,000
$170,000 $987,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 26
Packet Pg. 90
LO
228th St SW
PU
SubA
Project Description
qr'
Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add
Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (co
Project Benefit
Improve intersection safety for pedestr
Estimated Project Cost
$563,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
P
a
M
228TH ST SW
Westgate
Chapel
rb for access management. his project was identified in the SR-104
ted in 2015).
$85
$85,000 $1
$85,000 $478,000
$85,000 $478,000
2 27th St i
c
a i
s
C G
CV
C7' 0
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 27
Packet Pg. 91
8t h St S W 04
Off,
O�
Os
�q
r
Project Description_
Install traffic signal. This project was id fied in the SR-104 Compl
2015).
Project Benefit V
Improve vehicular and pedestrian safet A
Estimated Project Cost
$1,433,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
238TH ST SW�,,
7
Q
CO
N
Korean
Presbyter
Church
reet Corridor Analysis (completed in
14,
$214,000 $1,;
$214,000 $1,219,000
$214,000 $1,219,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 28
Packet Pg. 92
3
a�
S,� �iv;pvl Park Post Office
184th PI SW
¢.
EDM •r°c�
LVjvN�OODS
Osw�_ - -
OLYMPIC VIEW �R
Lynndale Park
Project Description_
Install traffic signal (the intersection cu ly stop controlled for all
2015 Transportation Plan: #11). —.A
Project Benefit
The improvement will reduce the inters
below the City's concurrency standards
Estimated Project Cost
$1,266,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
e
ments). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in
I of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is
the Level ofAkrvice to LOS B.
$213,00
me
$1,266,00
$1,266,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 29
Packet Pg. 93
'00w""'e I --
220TWST=SN
g'
i
J
���
i:,,f
r3 " 228TH ST Stir
�a i
Project Descriptio
Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with cu utter, bike lanes, and s
project was ranked #6 in the Long Wal list of the 2015 Tran
Project Benefit
Improve traffic flow, access and active t y inst�
bike lanes and street lighting.
Estimated Project Cost
$16,622,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
r I
on each side of the street. (part of this
,Plan).
a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks,
$2,122,00
0
u
L0,00
$16,622,00
$16,622,00,
Packet Pg. 94
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 30
.1
CO
r,
Project Description
Add a second westbound left turn lane
Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).,l
Project Benefit q
Improve access, safety and delay at the
Estimated Project Cost
$3,231,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
Seattie
Baptist
Church
W SW
2
---
Lake
Ballinger
N 205TH S T
w
Z
w
:d
��?ND,�
l
g SR-104. This project wasj�entified in the SR-104 Complete Street
$3,231,00
$3,231,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 31
Packet Pg. 95
CEjI 773rd Pl SW
.0
v ;
a
6�31th a�sWa
Project Description
Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a nort
the east to provide an acceleration lar
reduce intersection delay. (ROADWAY,
Project Benefit
Improve intersection efficiency and safety
Estimated Project Cost
$671,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
d left turn lane for 50' sto
eastbound left turns
JECT PRIORITY n
rs acce e
7>3rd St SVti
174th St SW
St. Thomas
Moore School
length. Shift the northbound lanes to
'fic signal to increase the LOS and
:ation Plan: #13)
reet.
A
$109,00
$671,00
$671,00
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 32
Packet Pg. 96
T
Ll
. 175th St SW c
Z
r
Snoh
Project Description_
The project will stabilize the roadway s ade and embankment and
St. SW.
Project Benefit
Repair roadway and stabilize slope em
Estimated Project Cost
$1,000,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
ild the damaged pavement on 175th
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
A
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 33
Packet Pg. 97
—� — --, x
s �ii J �txl=
'k
i
Project Descriptio
Upgrade traffic signal equipment at sell signalized intersections wi h new equipment within signal cabinet,
new vehicular detection, new vehicle , and/or new pedest
Project Benefit
Improve reliability of traffic signal oper i
Estimated Project Cost
$30,280
Design $2,000
Right of Way
Construction $28,280
Expense Total $30,280
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125 $30,280
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total $30,280
Packet Pg. 98
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 34
Project Description
Install guardrails along selected stretch roughout the City with ste
Project Benefit
Improve safety of City transportation em.
MEW
Estimated Project Cost
$20,190
Design
$1,000
Right of Way
Construction
$19,190
Expense Total
$20,190
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
$20,190
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$20,190
drop-offs and other safety issues.
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 35
Packet Pg. 99
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 36
231 s1 PI S'Jd
1
Project Descriptio
Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW fro
of 2015 Transportation Plan.
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$1,802,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
c�rrrc,yivLc �
5 1 L t u i' s
13 a ' 231 st St SW \Q� 0 r ' y�►��i
A 0 0
L J O
232nd St SUJ # i
7 I
233rd St SW
� a
N �
> S
4
V2341h
51 5W
C
Ave. W to SR-104. This_.Qroject ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List
$2
$276,000 $1,526,000
$276,000 $1,526,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 101
37
234th S i
_-A
oodway
,-mentary
N
Madrona 236th St S%AA
School
Project Description_
Install sidewalk with curb and gutter al 36nd St. SW from Madron Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project
ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the Transportation Plan
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$1,928,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$286,000 $1,f
$286,000 $1,642,000
$286,000 $1,642,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 38
Packet Pg. 102
W
a Q
CO H
�o
n
a.w
236th
3: Sr d
< a
N L
v
CO Q N
I L
r
CO h
Project Description_
Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW fro y 99 to 76th Ave. W. This
the 2015 Transportation Plan.
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$1,831,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
ject ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of
$1,831,00
$1,831,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 39
Packet Pg. 103
ESPERANCE
234th-St SW
234th St SW
-
'i �� �7_�
�rt PARK
,
T
Madrona Ln -- --
ECMONCS
APTS
%- wHIRLr
BALL ;
b_ad1%E__M_k `,I
„
m
Rs
i
00
W
j ■
����
°°
!�
Christ "LL
m
NORTH
88th
235th
Pi til°I
O
Lutheran
n HAVEN "
MANOR t
�
m
a
CHRISTLU
EANChurch% CHURCHOR
m aS
TRAILERN''E
sw��
'� ■
236th
dOFFICE
Park and Rie
236th St SW 3�
COURT
236th St SW
a
23601
Q
23603 SAFEWAY
23605 M N L KJIHG F F
23607 SUNSET
W
23619 O
RK PL
P
Q
WILLOW
CONDOS BROOK
B1-10 APTS F
R AURORA -
23701-32
ED noNo�,
-vMPlc
R
C E
]
g MARKETPLACE -
00 CRE ST
6
Q
-, 04
78G
`"
p
=
U FAMILY PANCAKE
08 ,
N
8$01 m
y „7 55„
o
�
-c
w
;; SVI
238TH ST
°p
-
238th
St SW ;
zaeoo
xaaoa23810
-
SEOUL
Project Description_
Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W fro th St .SW to 234th St. SW,
in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 T ortation Plan.
Project Benefit 4
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$840,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
h curb and gutter. This project ranked #5
160,
$160,000 $f
$160,000 $680,000
$160,000 $680,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 40
Packet Pg. 104
MA
L
W
a
207th SL S
a E
'0 G9
m
2G_lh St=S
}
3
iv
Q
a
c
N
20 att,-s'stiv
fw
_
lb
208th Pl SW
m
Project Description_
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W fror
in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Tran!
Project Benefit I
The improvements will improve active
schools).
Estimated Project Cost
$3,000,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
-"208TH-ST
IEDM(MDS--
SW —
-- -- ---
�
S
LU
=
a
c
i
a
S
210th Si SW I
�
�
v
a s
� s
� E
i
r
St. SW to 212th St. SW vy'th curb and gutter. This project ranked #1
on Plan.
(inclugWor school kids due to proximity of several
$250,
$250,000 $;
$250,000 $250,000 $2,500,000
$250,000 $250,000 $2,500,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 105
41
r1by
v�
1 v �
a PI
m 182`,
v W -4; m
84th St SW
St SW
0
a
Damns-.`180th
St SW�
v
Q
181st Pl SW c 70
Q�
r S
�s s•,v 182rd PI
782t d ST SW ��
G
�p � ,e'tridPismr
t~O
e Way a
�d9 -E
Q I
�r
185th PI SW
A/�
_—'
1861h St
�
7th PI Sw
>
LYNIV 0 0 D
a'
Y
SW
a
th St SW
> m m
a 7th PI SW
CD
-187th-PI-swV—: +
_h
00
SW
Project Description
Project
Z
S
`
0
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W fro
th St. SW to OVD. This pro'
ct ranked #13 in Long Walkway
List of the
2015 Transportation Plan.
ii
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
c
u
Estimated Project Cost
$3,007,000
'i
`
c
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
33,
$633,000 $2,:
$633,000 $2,374,000
$633,000 $2,374,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 42
Packet Pg. 106
Chase Lake Elementary 216th St SWi;:
a
a a'
N L
Chase Lake
School
218th c
Project Description
Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW fro 7Ave
84th Ave. W
in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Tran a
Project Benefit
The improvements will improve pede
Estimated Project Cost
$1,687,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
Edmonds Woodway High
School
Swedis
a
Y 3;: Edmonc ;
M
W
I8th St c
7 9th St S'
N
curb and gutter. This project ranked #2
2
$256,000 $1,431,000
$256,000 $1,431,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 43
Packet Pg. 107
'ER
BECK'S
Alder St
a
C
Z
Cedar St N
Project Description_
Install sidewalk on the south side of W St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th e. S. This project is ranked #9 in the Short
Walkway List (from 2015 Transportati n).
Project Benefit
This project will improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$281,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$45
$236,000
$281,000
$281,000
$281,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 44
Packet Pg. 108
ANT
TEVENS
11RT
Swedish
Edmonds
216
N'S
R
MCDO"ALD'S
f�
a
a
a
T
AEGIS
VALUE O
VILLAGEt?
EDMONDS
MEDICAL
PAVI
�T
K
OC
`C?�
/oJ
216th St SW
Project Descriptio
Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 2 St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72n Ave. W (completing a missing link on
north side of 216th St. SW). This proje anked #3 in the Shor List (from 2015 Transportation Plan)
Project Benefit
To provide a safe and desirable walking
Estimated Project Cost
$213,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$2519
$188, 000
$213,000
$213,000
$213,000
N
c
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 109
45
_= o
Project Description
Installation of bike lanes or sharrows al 7RFB
s street segm0ents as i entified on the Proposed Bike Facilities
map of 2015 Transportation Plan. Bik arrows will be g 1O0th St. SW / 9th Ave. from 244th
St. SW to Walnut St, Bowdoin Way fr to 84th from 80th Ave. to 78th Ave., and 80th
Ave. from 228th St. SW to 220th St. S l vari rossings along the Bowdoin and 9th Ave
/ 100th St. SW corridors.
Project Benefit
This project will create new bike connections to various desti
parks, Downtown, Sound Transit Station...). Sound Transit au
provide more convenient access so that more people can u
4
Estimated Project Cost
$2,234,000
Design
$12,652
Right of Way
Construction
$1,759,195
Expense Total
$1,771,847
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
$522,347
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Other (Sound Transit Grant)
$1,249,500
Funding Source Total
$1,771,847
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
■
ch as schools,
its that will
Packet Pg. 110
/
a
a
CASP_ERS-ST
200th-St=SW
.asmerr
z
Q
1Mountain
Lnz
V{sta PI
a
>
i
Q
N
lki
r
201 st ?I SW
to
�y
Q
Carol
(Sierra
9
a
3
202nd St SW�
a
=ha St W
PI
-
a
w
2
n
202nd PI SW ¢
a
>
a
`m
Q
t
Q
H
Glen Q�
a135
=
St SW �0
m
203rd S1
Ip 2
'��4th
5t 51�1
Dale
Daley Stv
,ca�is sw
s
Sprague St
PI N
��30
�\9
��
a
u
05th PI SW
a
_�
nds St
dmonds St
d„ s St
E dmond
`'
L
-h2061h
SFSW-
o
Bell St
St
5 o x
207th PI SW
NI
Q
a
°isvd
207th 5t
m
N
r—
-
N_S_T_--
Cl
co
it
2
208th
PI SW
Project Description
Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. Main St. to 200th St. SW
200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Av adjacent to Maplew
Walkway list of the 2015 Transportati an).
Project Benefit AW
Create pedestrian connection between Ma ood Ele y
encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to w
Estimated Project Cost T
$2,864,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on
kkntary School (rated #18 in the Long
on 200th St. nd Main St., by
n school.
$213,000
$ 2,
$213,000 $213,000
$213,000 $213,000 $2,438,000
$213,000 $213,000 $2,438,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 47
Packet Pg. 111
220THSTSW _ —_—V- - m-
LU El
0 '' . ■ •
ZZ s ■
OW L- NEI
W N � t' ..e'er
W w zzi71
*► .
LID
221. PI
r
rf I
22Ph St SW
7; MOM
I mom
Project Description_
Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from St. SW to 220th St. SW wit curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in
the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Tra rtation Plan.
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$837,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
127,
$127,000 $j
$127,000 $710,000
$127,000 $710,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 48
Packet Pg. 112
I
Washington State Ferry
Bracketts Terminal
Landing
South
a '
Post Office
sr
cj Mini Park
C2 C-11
Q, a
LU �a James Si 4ij
0 >
z a
� n
City of Edmonds —_
Treatment Plant Dayton St Da
N
- --A
7n st
Project Description
Install new and wider sidewalk along R d Ave from Dayton St. to S -1C
IMMMEW
Project Benefit
Improve active transportation safety 0
g Railr Jr
o to SR-104, key stretch since connects to
various destination points (such as Wat , Downtown Edmonds, WSDOT Ferry
Terminal...).
Estimated Project Cost
$980,000
Design $180,00�
Right of Way IV
Construction $800,000
Expense Total $180,000 $800,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund 40
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding $180,000 $800,000
Funding Source Total $180,000 $800,000
Packet Pg. 113
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 49
�
�
a Seattle W 243rd
PI SW
s
EQ�O.
s
Baptist
n Church Q
Lake
Ballinger
`-
Nas
O
�
o
205TH
;
N 205TH ST
`
N 204TH PL
104TH PIL w
a
s
z
LU
/V2
R� P�
=s
a20
o
W
—N�_
-
a I
Q�N
m
Project Descriptio
Aff
Extend bike lanes within proximity of t
corners and new ADA curb ramps.
Project Benefit I
Improve active transportation safety a
Estimated Project Cost
$2,000,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
rsection in northbound arjl southbound directions. Install APS on all
e Inter"n Trail and across SR-104.
0011111111111111111L$2
$200,000 $;
$200,000 $200,000 $1,600,000
$200,000 $200,000 $1,600,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 114
50
4
Project Description
Installation of street lights along variou eets within Downtow
Project Benefit
This project will add new street lightil. Downt- OrovE
�. Estimated Project Cost
$75,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$300,000 )0,000
$300,000 $1,200,000
$300,000 $1,200,000
$300,000 $1,200,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 51
Packet Pg. 115
Edmonds
Marsh
a
to
0
Z
0
it
Howell Way
I I�
Homeland 9s
■I 0
r
a
+m Hemlock Way 10
� �fA 10
a iQ Seamont Ln
s7 a T
-at St
A � G
Mac�ndia i ^ r
Spruce St
Spruce PI
Hemlock St
0 Laurel Wa1
< Laurel St
w
a'
CO
Iv � �
syth Ln ° a' Q a % a'
a m "�
Fir P a i ■
Fir SJL�
JL
Cedar St s
s
c
3
Spruce St ,
I Pine St
Project Description
�r
Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb s along SR-104 from the H K signal to Pine St and along Pine St from
SR-104 to 9th Ave S
Project Benefit
This project will improve pedestrian con he resi al areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown
Edmonds and City Park.
Estimated Project Cost
$3,180,000
Project Cost 2023 2024 F 2025 202.. 2027 k(O Y �-
Design $265,00 '65,000
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$2,650,00
$265,000 $265,000 $2,65
c
c
c
L03
$265,000 $265,000 $2,650,000
$265,000 $265,000 $2,650,000
Packet Pg. 116
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 52
~ M
Sierra
Park
a
CO
M how
--
192nd Pi SW
Project Descriptio
d7
Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW froi
Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transp
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$678,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
th Ave. W to 76th Ave., w
on Plan. _1dA
urb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in
$678,00
$678,00
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 53
Packet Pg. 117
Pabin Hood Drfo%
P
`v
� Friar P
E G
= Or
U1 Nottingham Rd
I�
Project Description -
Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W fro
#10 in the Long Walkway List of the 20
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$1,060,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
235th PI SW
Salem
Edmonds Lutheran
Heights Church
K-12
Scriber'Lake ■
High School
ut
2aeu, ri s:a
Q
2
236th PI SW �"
105th,c Hickman .o
Park a v
a I
i
a a a f
c
23� A� SW N
monds
Faith C ;' �
Orial Communit 238th St SW !
y C
etery Church z
th ST. SW to 106th Ave
nsportation Plan. _,A
with curb and gutter. This project ranked
$1,060,00
$1,060,00,
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 54
Packet Pg. 118
r.
219th st sW
20TH
Edmonds Church of God
Project Description
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W froi
#7 in the Short Walkway List of the 20
Project Benefit 4
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$324,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
SW
psi
:h ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, Ith curb and gutter. This project ranked
nsportation Plan.
$324,00
$324,00
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 55
Packet Pg. 119
186th St SW
187th St SW
N
1881h St SW
_ a
Project Description_
Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W fro 7St.SW186th St. SW
#5in Short Walkway List of the 2015 T n.
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$328,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
curb and gutter. This project ranked
$328,00
$328,00
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 56
Packet Pg. 120
Q
3
N
o
,G
y
S
s
2J81h St SW
CO
M
0ON
z
�q
i
W
s
r
2401h
W
Mathay
Ballinger
J �.._
Park
Project Description
Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW froi
the 2015 Transportation Plan.
Project Benefit
This project would improve pedestrian
Estimated Project Cost
$1,285,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
99 to 76th Ave. W. This pkoject ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of
7
$1
$187,000 $1,098,000
$187,000 $1,098,000
2023-2028 CIP—CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 121
57
a
7th and
Elm Park
m PI
to
C Ave W
Vista PI �
_�
H
O�
V)
CO
w
a
o �
0
yo 0
�dr �Gp r
�y I
Sea Vista
220TH ST SW
Project Description_
The walkway project is ranked #6 on th 7sixpedesl,�trian
ist from the 20 5 Transportation Plan. The project will
install approximately 700 feet of new ac nd modify the existing stormwater
system on Elm Way between 8th Ave. d
Project Benefit
The project will improve pedestrian safety
and 9th Ave.
Estimated Project Cost
$1,032,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$901,974
Expense Total
$901,974
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
$552,047
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$349,927
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$901,974
de J3qJJhLng JWf sidewalk on UJLWay between 8th Ave
A
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 58
Packet Pg. 122
Project Description
Addition of Rectangular Rapid Flashing
selected locations throughout the City,
Project Benefit 1
Improve safety at pedestrian crossings.
Estimated Project Cost
$80,780 (2023)
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
ons (RRFB) and/or flashin
project will also beajW
$80,780
�I
D lights around regulatory signs at
rung and signage.
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
59
Packet Pg. 123
Project Descriptio"
The study will evaluate and inventory t
study will also develop a priority list of
pedestrian lighting and policies for th
lights within residential neighborhoo
:y's existing street light
rvements and cost e
ion of street I
Improve the City's street light system and reduce gaps in
Estimated Project Cost
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$60,000
i and identify gaps in service. The
ndard details for street and
,elopments and addition of street
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 60
Packet Pg. 124
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 61
Puget Sound
�W Dayton St
Edmonds Marsh
Project Description
Modify existing lane channelization on
Project Benefit
Reduce conflicts between ferry stora
Estimated Project Cost
$380,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
n.
Dayton_St-- bayton St
n-DaytonSt _ --
N a Maple St
c
Alder St�
Alder St
a
N N r
a Q
a =
M Ln Holly Dr
I
Howell Way
Home\and Dr a
m � r
a' �o
r N
c Hemlock Way
Erben Dr
Seamont Ln
to add vehicle storage forferry users.
$380,000
$380,000
$380,000
$380,000
�L2028 20294
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 62
Packet Pg. 126
6.A.b
1
OVA nn[a
AO
Packet Pg. 127
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 63
I
Project Description
Install traffic calming devices (such as
Project Benefit
Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets)
Estimated Project Cost
$33,130 (for 2023 $18,000 baseli
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
Feedback signs, speed cus!�Lons, or other elements).
Calming Policy.
$30,130 $18,000 $' J $18,000 `18,000 $1
$33,130 $18,000 $1b,000 $18,000 $18,000 $1
$33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 A
L'A
$33,130 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000
Packet Pg. 128
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 64
..... _ �y . •• Aver'.. � ..
Project Description_
The Plan identifies all existing ADA del
ramps, tripping hazards within sidewa
Audible Pedestrian Signals (APS).
Project Benefit
Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in t
Estimated Project Cost
ies within the City Right of ay (such as non -compliant ADA curb
i-compliant ADA dri d signalized intersection without
F
0 Project Cost 2023 2024 2025 0 2027 0W 2029-43
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$105,000
$105,000
$105,000
$105,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
65
Packet Pg. 129
6.A.b
DJF1
U -1
Um •
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 66
Packet Pg. 130
Project Descriptio
Update the City's long range transport plan.
Project Benefit
The Transportation Plan serves as th sport
Transportation Plan is being updated in I
existing and projected future land use and patter
bicycle and transit infrastructure and services and provides
transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportal
year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital Im
(CFP). ,
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -modal
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$170,000
$170,000
$170,000
it of th
e 202
le Tr
's Comprehensive Plan. The
prehensive Plan Update. Based upon
Fment
a tion Plan nd ibes roadway pedestrian,
of exis ' rojected future
rities and P1 opment of the six-
?nt Pro and Facilities Plan
Packet Pg. 131
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 67
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 68
Project Description
The City of Edmonds proposes the d(
infrastructure can both address storr
neighborhood and the downtown co
This project includes the following eleri�nts•
*Roadway narrowing to reduce traffic spe re%'
*Sidewalks and planting strips added
•Bioretention cells collect runoff from the road through curb
•Bioretention cells collect runoff directly from sidewalks
•Public private partnership potential with Housing Hope and,
Project Benefit
to demonstrate how green
pes to benefit the Hwy 99
Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of E s is intended
demonstrate how trees, vegetation, engineered green stormwater olutions, physical
and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening pedestrian crossings with
curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impacts, and reinforce desired
land use and transportation patterns on appropriate street rights -of -way. These projects
are intended to increase the livability of a diverse, growing city.
Estimated Project Cost
$4,264,342
Design
$219,717
Right of Way
Construction
$3,500,000
Expense Total
$219,717
$3,500,000
ARPA
$219,717
$1,113,006
Unsecured Funding
$2,386,994
Funding Source Total
$219,717
$3,500,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
69
r capacity retained)
Packet Pg. 133
i
Project Description0
-
The City of Edmonds proposes the dev ent of two (2) prototypical ites to demonstrate how green
infrastructure can both address storm flows and enhance apes to benefit the Hwy 99
neighborhood and the downtown cor
This project includes the following elerignts
*Roadway narrow (vehicular capacity reta
"N
*Sidewalks and planting strips expanded
•Bioretention planter collecting runoff from the road
•Standard landscape beds adjacent bioretention planter pic
planter.
Project Benefit
Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of
demonstrate how trees, vegetation, engineered green stormw
and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening I
curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impa
land use and transportation patterns on appropriate street rig[
are intended to increase the livability of a diverse, growing city
Estimated Project Cost
$1,722,652
Design
$78,027
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
$78,027
ARPA
$78,027
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$78,027
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
70
$1,600,000
$1,600,000
$1,600,000
$1,600,000
Packet Pg. 134
6.A.b
Water Prniects
"AhL,
#
CFP
DP
#
2023
2024
2025
2026
2028
TOTAL
(2023-2028)
TOTAL
(2029-43)
TOTAL Project
Cost
PWW-01
Phase 12 Annual Re lace 2022 34
Phase 13 Annual Re I ram 2023 38
Phase 14 Annual Pro ram 2024 35
$10,000
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$10,000
$10,000
PWW-02
$1,700,000
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$1,700,000
$1,700,000
PWW-03
$506,128
$3,525,379
$0 $0
$0
$0
$4,031,507
$4,031,507
PWW-04
Phase 15 An ant Program 2025
$0
$0
$0
$526,373
$0
$0
$3,666,379 $0
$547,428 $3,813,034
$0 $569,325
$0
$0
$3,965,555
$0
$0
$0
$4,192,752
$4,360,462
$4,534,880
$4,192,752
$4,360,462
$4,534,880
PWW-05
Phase 16 Annua nt Pro ram 2026
Phase 17 Annual Re ro ram 2027
PWW-06
PWW-07
Phase 18 Annual Re lac m 2028
$0 $0
$0 $0
$592,098
$4,124,177
$4,716,275
$4,716,275
PWW-10
2023 Waterline Overlay s 36
,000 $0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$50,000
$50,000
MAW-11
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Re airs 37
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$805,000
$805,000
PWW-12
Phase 19 Annual Replacement Pro ram 20
$0
$0 $0
$0
$615,782
$615,782
$615,782
Total Projects $3,071, $4,051,752 $4,213,807 $4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 $25,016,658 $0 $25,016,658
Funding Source 024
2025
2026 2027
202g
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
(2023.2028)
(2029.43)
-MIJWater Fund-421 28 $4,051,752
$4,213,807
$4,382,359 $4,557,653
$4,739,959
$25.016,658
$25,016,658
Total Revenue
$3,071,128 $4,051,752
$4,382,359 $4,557,653 $4,739,959 $25,016,658
$0 $25,016,658
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 72
Packet Pg. 136
Project Description -
Per the approved 2017 Water Compre ve Plan, the projects will
appurtenances at various locations thr out the City due to 0
pressure, or more prone to breakage o its material
Project Ben �
Maintain a high level of drinking water qua mpr0ve I s
breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease o
Estimated Project Cost
$1.7 to $4.1 million/year
ace/maintain pipe and related
khpg undersized, need to increase flow or
reliability, de se probability of
day maint sts.
Design
$506,128
$526,373
$54W28
$569,325
lW2,098
$615,14
Right of Way
Construction
$1,710,000
$3,525,379
$3,666,379
$3,813,034
$3,965,555
$4,124
Expense Total
$2,216,128
$4,051,752
$4,213,807
$4,382,359
$4,557,653
$4,
Water Fund 421
$2,216,128
$4,051,752
$4,213,807
$4,382,359
$4,557,653
,959
Funding Source Total
$2,216,128
$4,051,752
$4,213,807
$4,382,359
$4,557,6
39,959
Packet Pg. 137
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 73
Project Description
Road pavement overlays to cover area
the Waterline Replacement Projects.
Project Benefit
Improve overall pavement condition in
Projects.
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Water Fund 421
Funding Source Total
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
and patched in previous years as part of
d patched due to Waterline Replacement
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
74
Packet Pg. 138
Project Descriptio
This work is being done to provide stru
potable water storage reservoirs. Prel
magnitude/preliminary costs and nex
report for the Yost Reservoir, which i
plus repairs to address leakage from t
process of being finalized, shows similar
v
i85th PI SW
0
rn
186th PI SW Seeaaview
Water Tank
tI upgrades, repair leaka,
dry findings einary
,s for the no
plete, a
s
Project Benefit
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve ove
retrofit structures so that they meet current structural code
decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Water Fund 421
Funding Source Total
$805,000
$805,000
$805,000
W
a
00
00
ind upgrades to our two underground
022 were used to determine order of
nd upgrades project. Preliminary
major structural and seismic retrofit,
r the Seaview Reservoir, which is in the
to a somewhat lesser scale.
ility of leakage,
hLquakes, and
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
75
Packet Pg. 139
#fi
+` � `(47,( �{�+ ��y�_ ttiR�.�,
Al
Jam- •.
�.
NMI.
6.A.b
m
Packet Pg. 140
6.A.b
Stormwater P
# CFP PROJECT DP 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Y028 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Proje
# (2023-2028) (2029-43) Cost I _
Edmonds Marsh tuary Restoration Related Projects +�+
PWD-01 X Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements Phase 1) 1 $366,843 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $366.843 $366,£ .Q
V
Perrinville Creek Basin Projects
PWD-03
Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects
44
$120,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$620,000
$620,(
PWD-04
X
Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Phase 1
39
$750,000
$500,000
$2,800,000
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$7,050,000
$7,050,(
PWD-05
X
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
40
$10,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,000
$10,(
PWD-23
Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update
43
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$1501(
_
a
ILL
U
Storm Drainage Improvement Projects cc
IL
PWD-06 Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design & Construction $0 $200,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,( N
PWD-22 7317 Lake Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase & Structure Removal 46 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $750,( 41
y+
Annually Funded Projects (
PWD-11
I
Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2023
42
$290,000
$1,622,400
$0
$0
$0J$01
$1,912,400
$1,912f
PWD-12
Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2024
$0
$324,480
$1,687,296
$0
$0
$2,011,776
$2,011,i
PWD-13
Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2025
$0
$0
$337,460
$1,754,786
$0
$2,092,246
$2,092,:
PWD-14
Phase 7 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2026
$0
$0
$0
$350,958
$1,824,977
$2,175,935
$2,175,t
PWD-15
Phase 8 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2027
$0
$0
$0
$0
$364,996
$2,262,972
$2,262,t
PWD-16
Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project 2029
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$379,596
$379,F
PWD-19
2023 SD Overlays
41
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
1 $200,(
M
LL
Q
O
N
O
N
Compliance Related Projects r
M
N
PWD-17 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan 45 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,( N
..r
Total Projects $3,236,843 $2,746,880 $7,924,756 $5,205,744 $2,289,973 $2,377,572 $23,781,768 $0 $23,781,7 d
IL
0
Funding Source
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Y028
TOTAL
(2023-2028)
TOTAL
(2029-43)
TOTAL
Stormwater Utility Fund - 422
$ 1,834,220
$ 2,292,776
$ 3,672,693
$ 2,955,744
$ 2,289,973
$ 2,377,572
$ 15,422,978
$ 15,422,9
ARPA Funds
$ 681,116
$ 454,104
$ 192,464
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,327,684
$ 1,327,6
Secured Grants
$ 721,507
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 721,507
$ 721,5
Unsecured Grants
$ -
$ -
$ 41059,599
1 $ 2,250,000
1 $ -I
$ -
$ 6,309,599
L
1 $ 6,309,5
Total Revenue
$ 3,236,843
$ 2,746,880
$ 7,924,756
1 $ 5,205,744
1 $ 2,289,973
1 $ 2,377,572
$ 23,781,768
1
1 $ 23,781,7
d
ci
O
N
O
N
r
M
N
O
N
In
Y
L
Q
a
m
E
a
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 77
Packet Pg. 141
Packet Pg. 142
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Project Descriptio
The project will be improving water qu
side of SR-104, along the frontage of th
include water quality filter cartridges.
discharges that directly enter the ma
1 replacing the catch basins on the we!
side of SR-104.
Project Benefit
Wildlife
Refuge Walnut St-z
I I
I
�.
QI
Howell Way
O City Park
Z
¢
O
of stormwater runoff by re acing existing catch basins along the west
monds marsh. The c will be replaced with catch basins that
proposes this provide water quality mitigation for all
m thes e pr twill be divided into phases, with phase
d a futur se replacing the catch basins on the east
Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Ed
located near the marsh. The improvements will provide be4
Estimated Project Cost
$366,843
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$366,843
$366,843
$152,836
$214,007
$366,843
Packet Pg. 143
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 79
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 80
Ilt►1
Project Description_
Reducing scouring flows to reduce sedi s load in Perrinville Creek
completed in 2015 as a critical elemen estoring this creek w
development. The projects funded by rogram are iCn
adequate fish habitat. These efforts ecome itical
Perrinville Creek outfall area. This pro i ement'
to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allo exibIrescluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available
Project Benefit
The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, im
peak flow events.
Estimated Project Cost
$120,000/year
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
s identified in a previous basin report
en significantly impacted by urban
oward recovering this stream run as
n recent challenges around the
rojects within the Perrinville Creek basin
o ad -hoc oppor unities such as rain garden
nt applicatiow reductions projects
$110,000
$90,000
$90,000
$90,000
$120,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000 $
$120,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000 $
$120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Packet Pg. 145
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 81
Puget Sound
4P
F�
�0
K's
A
Project Descriptio
The city has struggled to manage and ain the undersized outfall s tem at Perrinville Creek. The current
combination of multiple stake holders k alignment, sedime undersized culverts creates several
issues which make the creek unsustai as a natural s rn must be addressed from the bottom
of the creek up in order to sequence lief oft con correctly. The improvements are needed
to relieve current flooding, ease City m to
This project will build on any interim BNS -wa
under Talbot Road which is fully compliant with current fl
also include time and effort to research and apply for supp
can be built. This complex project includes many stakehold
development phase will be needed before being ready for
Project Benefit
nd pr
kDlac
The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future an
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
etter and more sustainable fish habitat.
existing BNSF c vert and a new culvert
ment and fis a regulations. It will
/additional f s so that the project
estimate mini year design and
tic
$2,800,000 $3,000,000 IV
$750,000 $500,000 $2,800,000 $3,000,000
$68,884 $45,896 $797,937 $750,000
$681,116 $454,104 $192,464
$1,809,599 $2,250,000
$750,000 $500,000 $2,800,000 $3,000,000
Packet Pg. 146
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 82
i
Post
12
Office
Seaview Park
r
�
s
�
o
185th St SW
a'
o
C
W q�
I
.
185th PI SW
i
c
i
CO
St SW
I
i
i
`�
rn
CO
(
C
Project Description
ff
Reducing scouring flows in order to red
report completed in 2015 as a critical
urban development. The project is a
habitat. The grant for this project has
system in Seaview Park, almost identic o
sediments load in Perrinvill Creek was identified in a previous basin
nt of restoring this c has been significantly impacted by
mental step t this stream run as an adequate fish
dy been is pr proposes construction of an infiltration
Phase 1 ct which was completed in 2019, in order
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants $7,500
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total $10,000
Packet Pg. 147
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA 83
Project Description
Supplemental study to update Perrinvi
projects that would help decrease the
Project will be updated to reflect prof
basin to aid in the reduction of peak
Project Benefit
reek 2015 basin analysis th
r1 storm flows during
:ompleted and
in the bama
Improve overall basin and stream health, by using green stal
that rainfall is not simply collected and conveyed downstrea
conditions. This includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close a
stream peak flows, which will decrease stream erosion and J
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$150,000
Lynnwood
etermined possible locations for
ents.
there are other locations within the
rInfrastructur
stea4wbeh
ble to
the
This will make it so
possible to natural
so decrease
uatic life.
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 84
Packet Pg. 148
6.A.b
'l�
•lp
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 85
Packet Pg. 149
j
0D 2401h St SW `tier
Mathay
Ballinger LLI
IL Park
240th PI SW = 241 St St SW
a
N
r,
42 nAStS
Project Descriptio
Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flood seasonal algae blooms a
The Highway 99 corridor is an area of evelopment, includi
stormwater mitigation. By creating a nal facility, the
by development, addressed stormwa itigation a fut
one of the City bigger pollution genera g can dra
The project proposes to implement Ovate and ntro
Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which woul
conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underut <
Project Benefit
The project proposes to implement water quality and flow rol im
Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would si ific
conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutiliz
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
Pith otherwater quality impairments.
City project which will require
the stormwater mitigation achieved
hway project, and treat runoff from
mprove Lake Ballinger water quality.
ments at&Q-ownecl Mathay-Ballinger
ly benefit theogy and habitat
rk.
$200,000 $3,000,000
$200,000 $3,000,000
$200,000 $750,000
$ 2, 250, 000
$200,000 $3,000,000
Packet Pg. 150
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 86
Project Description
The project proposes to purchase an e g single family residential ploperty located within the Lake
Ballinger flood plain. The City secured 0,000 Department o ant to aid in this process. The home is
the lowest property on the lake and i y damaged fro
ing to the point it is generally
uninhabitable. It is also nearly undev ble due
plain critical area regulations onsite.
The City intends to remove the home an ution
atin faces from the 'te as part of the initial
effort on the site. The grant has restrictions for allowing t
be used for e. After demolition of
the structures and impervious surfaces, the planned site use
a for publi t only. Because the
City storm drain line for SR-104 cuts through in an easement i
diately ad' o this the City plans to
pursue a future project to split appropriate flows from the C'
stem an a water qu atment to the
maximum extent feasible. The future project would provid
er qua ' t for a very trafficked
highway (SR-104) and would make significant improvement
ate to L Ilinger and i s d stream
course to Lake Washington via McAleer Creek.
Project Benefit
Improve the health and water quality of Lake Ballinger by removing hard surfaces and a home that is
uninhabitable. Project will also provide a future location to treat stormwater runoff from portions S1
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
$750,000
Construction
Expense Total
$750,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$250,000
Secured Grants
$500,000
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$750,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
87
Packet Pg. 151
6.A.b
Am01 0 10WA
♦131
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 88
Packet Pg. 152
ILI,
Project Descriptio
Annual storm drain replacement/main ce projects. Projects propo a to replace or rehab storm drain
infrastructure in several locations thro ut the City. Locations entified by City crews and staff via
firsthand knowledge or video inspecti sults. Much of ater infrastructure is past its useful
lifespan and requires routine replace or repai the ion of the storm drain system. Failure to
conduct annual maintenance projects i s of stor in system failure.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, a crease ove,@11111 &taintenance costs.
$1.9 to $2.2 million/year
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
89
Packet Pg. 153
o n.
F..447�d
Project Description
Road pavement overlays to cover area!
the Annual Storm Maintenance Projec
Project Benefit Im
Improve overall pavement condition in
Replacement Projects.
4==Nff
$200,000
dways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of
2025
Design
$15,000
Right of Way
Construction
$185,000
Expense Total
$200,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$200,000
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$200,000
d patched due to the Annual Storm
4
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 90
Packet Pg. 154
6.A.b
011TAUIU
k1l3
Packet Pg. 155
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 91
Project Description
This project would be a comprehensi)
recommendations for improvements
maintenance projects. No on -going c
or projects, which will be done as ney
' a �
eMuw
� t
r - !
EOMOHOS mnwy fw
NAM s+ NRnF9Y
' unw�wirouteo
1: NTLAKE
_ e RRACE
rnx:� w
r � e ■s
luation of the City's storm
ustments and recom
e anticipated
ital proj budij
Project Benefit
A holistic summary of the City's Stormwater system with
maintenance and improvements projects.
Estimated Project Cost
$600,000
Design
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Funding Source Total
in system and operations with
Iorities for selecting future capital
ent any recommended improvements
lanning/process.
ng future capital
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
a
Packet Pg. 156
fi
l4k
IN,
� !j
114
Wo
-, yr-
6.A.b
Sower Prniects
n
#
CFP
CT
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Re rovements 2022
Phase 10 Annual Sew /im rovements 2023
Phase 11 Annual ehab/Im rovements 2024
DP
#
49
2024
2025
2026
2028
TOTAL
(2023-2028)
TOTAL
(2029-43)
TOTAL Project
Cost
PWS-01
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$30,000
$30,000
PWS-02
52
$1,689,212
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,689,212
$1,689,212
PWS-03
50
$349,517
$1,964,780
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,314,297
$2,314,297
PWS-04
Phase 12 An a I/Rehab/Im rovements 2025
Phase 13 Annua I/Rehab/Im rovements 2026
Phase 14 Annual Se hab/Im rovements 2027
$0
$363,498
$2,043,372
$0
$0
$0
$2,406,870
$2,406,870
PWS-05
$0
$0
$0
$0
$378,038
$0
$2,125,107
$393,160
$0
$2,210,111
$0
$0
$2,503,145
$2,603,271
1 $2,503,145
$2,603,271
PWS-06
PWS-07
Phase 15 Annual Sewer Im rovements 2028
Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer
$0
$0
$0
$521,611
$0
$542,475
$0
$564,174
$408,886
$586,741
$2,298,515
$610,210
$2,707,401
$2,825,211
$2,707,401
$2,825,211
PWS-10
PWS-11
Lake Ballin er Sewer
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$7,000,000
$7,000,000
PWS-12
Ci ide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase
53
$4
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$423,710
$423,710
PWS-14
2023 SS Overlays
51
$200,
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$200,000
PWS-15
I Phase 16 Annual Sewer Re I/Rehab/Im rovements 2029
$0
$0
$0
$0
$425,242
$425,242
$425,242
Total Projects $2,69 $3,849,889 $8,963,885 $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $2,908,725 $24,703,117 $0 $24,703,117
Funding Source7:=S :p
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
4 I(2023.2028) (2029.43)
„ a I— - — A —1 ezQAoQsa ez Q AA, I ez� �7 Q 1e o Q, G ,�z,,, —A—,,,
Total Revenue
$2,692,439 $3, ,a
F $3,082,441 $3,205,738 $2,908,725 $24,703,117 $0 $24,703,117
tC
a+
.Q
R
U
C
fC
a
LL
U_
c
N
d
�r
fC
LL
tC
.Q
tC
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a
LL
U
a
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
Co
N
to
Y
i
O
_v
3
a
c
a>
E
U
t0
Q
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 94
Packet P9, 158
# .0 T--;4
A
Project Description_
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Compre
various locations throughout the City
to breakage due to its material prope
Project Benefit
Improve system reliability and capacity, d
day to day maintenance costs.
Estimated Project Cost
$1.7 to $2.7 million/year
e Plan, the projects will re ace pipe and related appurtenances at
old age, being unde d to increase capacity, or more prone
and decrease overall
Design
$449,517
$363,498
$3-710IT38
$393,160
'68,886 $42
Right of Way
Construction
$1,619,212
$1,964,780
$2,043,372
$2,125,107
$2,210,111 $2,29
Expense Total
$2,068,729
$2,328,278
$2,421,410
$2,518,267
$2,618,997 $2,
Sewer Fund 423
$2,068,729
$2,328,278
$2,421,410
$2,518,267
$2,618,997
Funding Source Total
$2,068,729
$2,328,278
$2,421,410
$2,518,267
$2,618,9 , 2
Packet Pg. 159
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 95
•YA
Lam,
Project Description
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Compre
line existing sewer mains that are subj
by this trenchless method.
Project Benefit
Improve system reliability and capacity, d
day to day maintenance costs.
Estimated Project Cost
$520,000 to $600,000/year
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Funding Source Total
plan and current video
intrusion, infiltrat-WA
ons of sewer mains, the project will
v, and damage that can be repaired
and decrease overall
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 96
Packet Pg. 160
t5F t:KANC.t _
a rlsw R. Holly 1 M T%f
Y Ln �.
,
Maple
i 2341h`St'SW— 3'T 234th St SW 1
a Madrona Ln n
O `cZ
�.
236th St SW t SW236th St SW,
/ C
00 L N
St SSW 23 W �'� nth St SW ` a'
r S��
a �3
240th S
mj Q
is 701
242nd St
244TH ST SW
Project Description
Irk
232nd St Sw 232nd St SW 232nd St
m
q
235thStSv .r>sw �z
235TH PL SW_ LV 236TH ST SW
Lake
Ballinger
JEB-ALLINGER-WAY—=244
:
3
C 23gthSJ
IL
v
y i
k
o `
z421V c
N
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Compre ve plan and current video i pections of sewer mains, the sewer pipe
along Lake Ballinger will require additi low capacity in the n These improvements are needed to
account for population growth, reduc Itration and Inf a and improve maintenance and
emergency access for this major trun em.
Project Benefit
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltratioq
maintenance costs. Improved access will help ease maintena
decease any chance of potential sewer spills into Lake Balling
Estimated Project Cost
$7,000,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000
w,and d
access fc
$5,000,000
$1,000,000 $5,000,000
$1,000,000 $5,000,000
$1,000,000 $5,000,000
II day to day
\which will further
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 97
Packet Pg. 161
a
FA 'GION
Lam,
Project Description
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Compre
line existing sewer mains that are subj
by this trenchless method.
Project Benefit
Improve system reliability and capacity, d
day to day maintenance costs.
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Funding Source Total
plan and current video
intrusion, infiltrat-WA
ons of sewer mains, the project will
v, and damage that can be repaired
and decrease overall
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 98
Packet Pg. 162
Project Description
Road pavement overlays to cover area
the Sanitary Sewer Replacement Proje
Project Benefit
Improve overall pavement condition in
Replacement Projects.
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Funding Source Total
$188,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
and patched in previous years as part of
d patched due to Sanitary Sewer
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 99
Packet Pg. 163
POW
so%
w �'
I c C A L
T a it —
-MUSEUM• i910 •
-
'10C
.4 100
6.A.b
m
0
3:
.2
E
0
L-
IL
as
6.A.b
Facilities Projects
#
CFP
ECT
Bo s and Girls Club
Cemete Buildin
CityHall
FishingPier/ rStation
Frances Anders
DP
#
2023
2026
2027
2028
TOTAL
(2023-2028)
TOTAL
(2029-43)
TOTAL Project
Cost
PWF-01
$150,034
$27,733
$37,453
$32,077
$15,101
$20,000
$282,398
$0
$282,398
PWF-02
$1,954
$2,094
$8,414
$3,377
$818
$1,000
$17,657
$0
$17,657
PWF-03
$150,000
$323,246
$279,064
$70,949
$108,628
$80,000
$1,011,887
$0
$1,011,887
PWF-04
$70,000
$2,971
$2,918
$5,628
$1,043
$1,500
$84,060
$0
$84,060
PWF-05
$525,002
$298,378
$98,892
$20,934
$113,029
$80,000
$1,136,235
$0
$1,136,235
PWF-06
Fire Station i6
$47,689
$81,545
$1,591
$100,000
$69,388
$221,922
$30,107
$27,575
$31,631
$122,245
$35,000
$45,000
$215,406
$598,287
$0
$0
$215,406
$598,287
PWF-07
Fire Station 17
PWF-08
Fire Station 20
Fire Life Safet Communications
Historic Log Cabin
Historical Museum
11-11brary
Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing Project
Meadowdale Club House
Old Public Works
,000
$16,274
$0
$94,248
$0
$69,782
$0
$23,765
$0
$20,000
$0
$244,069
$60,000
$0
$0
$244,069
$60,000
PWF19
PWF-09
$
$888
$546
$1,361
$6,469
$1,500
$90,764
$0
$90,764
PWF-10
$63,
$15,000
$10,000
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
$107,909
$0
$107,909
PWF-11
$25,0
$231,077
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
$0
$389,440
$0
$389,440
PWF-23
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$0
$4,900,000
PWF12
$3,665
$24,308
$7,985
$25,000
$4,446
$25,000
$1,159
$24,519
$5,000
$25,000
$115,681
$231,570
$0
$0
$115,681
$231,570
PWF-13
PWF-14
Parks Maintenance Building
0,789
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
$214,863
$0
$214,863
PWF-20
Parks Restrooms Maintenance
$55,000
$50,000
0
$25,000
$25,000
$100,000
$305,000
$0
$305,000
PWF-15
Public Safety$50,967
$445,276
$151,481
$515,071
$80,000
$1,297,964
$0
$1,297,964
PWF-16
Public Works O&M
$201,570
$79,348
$43,821
$50,000
$673,697
$0
$673,697
PWF-21
Public Works EV Conduit Addition
$125,000
$0
$0
$0
$125,000
$0
$125,000
PWF-17
Wade James Theater
9,077
0
$115,734
$21,872
$25,000
$324,163
$0
$324,163
PWFA8
Yost Pool House
$26,128
,409
$19,127
$30,389
$30,000
$0
$179,623
PWF-22
Ci Park Gazebo Roof
0.00
$0
$0$0$0$0
"1796231
$0
$50,000
MPF-
Total Projects $2,112,978 $1, 1,156,277 $736,7 67 $624,000 $12,655,673 $0 $12,655,673
Funding Source
2023
2024 2025 028
TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL
$ $452, 0 $0 0
(2023-2028) (2029-43)
Fund 016 2021 Facilities Bond
$1,127,151
$2,968,461 $0
$2,315,378 $0
$2,968,461
$2,315,378
Fund 016 non-bondproceeds)
$819,995
L, $76,592 00
General Fund
$25,000
$0
$0 $
$25,000 $0
$25,000
Water Utility Fund 421
$12,500
$0
$0 $ $0 $
12,500 $0
$12,500
Stormwater UtilityFund 422
$12,500
$0
$0 $0 $0 $0
00 $0
$12,500
Sewer UtilityFund 423
$12,500
$0
$0 $0 $0 $0INE
$0
$12,500
Unsecured Funding
$90,832
$106,074
$25,000
$460,033 $1,122.395 S592,500
$7 $0
$7,296,834
Total Revenue
$2,112,978 $1,926,669 $1,156,277 $736,762 $1,1
$12,655,673
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 101
Packet Pg, 165
R
-Iqwr' 7
Project Description
This building built in 1900 was the origi field house for Edmonds H
Field and not part of the large Civic Fie rk restoration projec
Snohomish County Boys and Girls Cluj artnership wit
building has sustained some interior ng that med
back stairway. It has significant need f a' s if it is e
years. Renovation and deferred mainten ecli bui
Projects: Exterior plumbing access, Window replacement, I
Plumbing replacement, Front entry door replacement, Fire
Baseboard heating replacement
School. The property is located at Civic
ing is solely operated by the
and Recreation department. The
repair to back hallway floors and the
ed to be in operation for another 10
value in its currcent location.
ent, Si ent, ADA Access,
ne ation, rinkler updates,
Project Benefit -
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assures d property o g conditions
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte ifespan. A well -ma ained facility cr(
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. R
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to opera
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$282,398
Construction\Professional Services
$150,034
$27,733
$37,453
$32,077
$15,101
$20,000
Expense Total
$150,034
$27,733
$37,453
$32,077
$15,101
$20,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$150,034
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$27,733
$37,453
Unsecured Funding
$32,077
$15,101
$20,000
Funding Source Total
$150,034
$27,733
$37,453
$32,077
$15,101
$20,000
c
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 102
Packet Pg. 166
�mox�ds
McN"M
CEhiETEkY
Project Description_
This small structure houses the Edmon metery funerary services a d the cemetery Sextant office. The
building is in relatively good condition as little deferred ma' backlog. Minor security and
communications updates will be need technology di
Projects:
Minor repair and maintenance
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assL
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$17,657
Construction\Professional Services
$1,954
$2,094
$8,414
Expense Total
$1,954
$2,094
$8,414
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$1,954
$2,094
$8,414
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$1,954
$2,094
$8,414
tions and to
ky creates a
e. Routine
$3,377 $818 $1,000
$3,377 $818 $1,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA
103
Packet Pg. 167
A&')S iFJ�; MIr _l\ 1r
r „1
IN
Project Description_
City Hall was built in 1979 and was ope 7asaate busine0ss offic center until the City purchased and
renovated the building in the 1990s. T rated Edm all from this location since the
renovations were completed. The bui origi needs substantial repair and
maintenance.
Projects: All Mechanical, Electrical and PI1qWRTY_ste d rE
neutral consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and
Interior Painting, ADA accessibility improvements.
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to a s
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an ex ct
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promote
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$1,011,887
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
lent, Restroo remodels w/gender
Lobby rem�try Awning re -glazing,
Nbuilding
g condl�f s and to
rn.Ained faci lit
tes a
<place confidence. e
des forems tooperate
$150,000 $323,246 $279,064 $70,949 $1MW8 $80,000
$150,000 $323,246 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000
$323,246 $129,064
$150,000 $150,000
$70,949 $108,628
$150,000 $323,246 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628
$80,000
$80,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA
104
Packet Pg. 168
Project Description_
The Pier was recently renovated and is
office and restroom facility located ne-
functions that operate out of this facilj
-ally in good condition. Th
east end of the pier A
Projects: Electrical panel and pier elec"I f ent
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assu
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exK
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumpti
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$84,060
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
ich Ranger Office is a 1200 square foot
season programs and visitor support
airs, and maintenance
itions and to
cility creates a
6e. Routine
trate as
$5,628 $1,043 $1,500
$70,000 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
Packet Pg. 169
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 105
Project Description
The Frances Anderson Center serves
programing year round. Due to the a
need of replacement or restoration.
-ity's main recreation cent offering arts, athletic and cultural
high usage of the b are many building systems that are in
Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilawwi"Floor,
Replacement of all exterior doors (24 ea) ,
appropriate), Plumbing drainage collector, Gy
gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing
classroom flooring, Addition of building security card reader
Alarm replacement, Fire Sprinkler replacement. Oil tank ren
Project Benefit
ill add ventilation, cooling and heating,
osures, New WI doves (historically
ains ADA corn estroom remodels (w/
Replaceme common area and
ing HVAC s to e efficiency, Fire
on, and uilding act nce efforts.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure s d property o g conditions
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte ifespan. A well maI ained facility cr(
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. R
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to opera
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$525,002
$298,378
$98,892
$525,002
$298,378
$98,892
$525,002
$298,378
$98,892
$525,002
$298,378
$98,892
$20,934 $113,029 $80,000
$20,934 $113,029 $80,000
$20,934 $113,029 $80,000
$20,934 $113,029 $80,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
106
Packet Pg. 170
Project Description_
This facility is operated by South Snol
of 10,700 square feet. The building is
replacements to remain operationall,
Projects: roll -up bay door controller
updates.
County Fire and Rescue an was built in 2003 and has a building area
condition and will re infrastructure updates or
for the need
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assL
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$215,406
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$47,689 $69,388
$1,591
$47,689 $1,591 $69,388
t, gutter replacement, interior coatings
itions and to
y creates a
e. Routine
$30,107 $31,631 $35,000
$30,107 $31,631 $35,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA 107
Packet Pg. 171
A
5 y
mid-
WMIF - rViM =mom
Project Description_
This building is operated by South Sno h County Fire and Rescue
9,800 square feet. This building has ha a updates but will n
operationally ready.
Projects: bay door assessment, draina".Ip I i
ceiling replacement.
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assL
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$598,287
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$81,545
$100,000
$221,922
$81,545
$100,000
$221,922
$81,545
$100,000
$221,922
s built in 1999 and has a building area of
ynfrastructure upgrades to remain
updates, roof soffit enclosure, bay
$27,575 $
$27,575 $
$27,575 $122,245
$81,545 $100,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245
itions and to
y creates a
e. Routine
$45,000
$45,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA 108
Packet Pg. 172
Project Description_
This building is the eldest of the City's t fire stations and is operate by South County Fire and Rescue. This
station serves Esperance and supports ther two fire station ds. The building is 6400 square feet
and was built in 1990. The building h significant u rior envelope and is in need of interior
and HVAC system updates.
Projects: storm water drainage system, i aintin
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assL
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$244,069
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
re replaceme
itions and to
y creates a
e. Routine
$20,000
$16,274
$94,248
$69,782
$23, $20,000
$20,000
$16,274
$94,248
$69,782
$ $20,000
$20,000
$16,274
$94,248
$69,782
$23,765 $20,000
$20,000
$16,274
$94,248
$69,782
$23,765 $20,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA
109
Packet Pg. 173
mom
A
4 Project Description
This Historic log cabin is home to thJE ds Chamber of Commerce isitor center, the structure was a purpose
built cabin from the turn of the censtructure is profess' ntained on a three year cycle by a log
cabin specialist and requires only mintenance and
Projects: new thick cut shingle replace n to
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assu
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an exK
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumpti
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$90,764
or
Fand prop
1 lifespan
workpJA
itions and to
cility creates a
6e. Routine
trate as
Construction\Professional Services
$80,000
$888
$546
$1,361
$6,469 1,500
Expense Total
$80,000
$888
$546
$1,361
$6 $1,500
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$80,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$888
$546
$1,361
$ 1469 $1,500
Unsecured Funding
$5,969
Funding Source Total
$80,000
$888
$546
$1,361
$12,438 $1,500
Packet Pg. 174
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 110
r.
Project Description -
�crki�
Y
The 110-year-old original Carnegie Libr uilding is home to the Edm ds Museum. The building is on the State
of Washington Historic registry and ha n well maintained ov several years. Buildings of this age
require specialized maintenance and ination with t rchitect to maintain the historic status.
Structural stabilization and weatherp ng are th ican rities to maintain this facility.
Projects: minor structural reinforcement, Bade ry r lower entry re oration
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assu a and pr peratin tions and to
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an e d lifesp II maintaine y creates a
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pr es wor e cy and confi e. Routine
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption d p for bui stems to op as
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$107,909
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$63,089
$15,000
$10,000
$63,089
$15,000
$10,000
$50,000
$15,000
$10,000
$13,089
$63,089
$15,000
$10,000
$4,621
$10,
$4,621
$
$4,621
$10,199
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 175
MR %R%
Project Description_
The Edmonds Library is operated by th
rental space. The library is a 19,000 sq
daily Library programming and comm
public and has significant deferred m�
waterproofing.
-Isle Library system with a eption of the Second floor Plaza room
foot building built in uilding hosts special event rentals and
services. This i s most heavily used buildings by the
nance n g th ding fagade and plaza deck
Projects: window replacement, ADA access device upgra
ement, gend
ive public restroom
creation, Plaza Room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza Roo
nstallation,
my restoration or
building cladding, exterior stairway restoration, HVAC ventila
n replace uildi
zeway remodel,
exterior planter box replacement and waterproofing, flood
e restor
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assures
d property o
g conditions
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte
ifespan. A well mai
ained facility cre
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes
workplace efficiency and confidence. Ro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to opera
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$389,440
Construction\Professional Services
$25,000
$231,077
Expense Total
$25,000
$231,077
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$25,000
$150,902
Unsecured Funding
$80,175
Funding Source Total
$25,000
$231,077
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
$53,325 $45,038 $35,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 112
Packet Pg. 176
Project Description_
This 4000 square foot facility was built 65 as a community theate
Meadowdale community club house. uilding is currently o
houses the City operated Meadowdal -school and th r
facility. This facility while dated has b ell mai only r�
Projects: minor maintenance and repairs, or
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assL
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pro
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$115,681
paA
acility and later was transformed into the
aintained by the City of Edmonds and
t Meadowdale club house rental
es minor maintenance and repairs.
and bath fixtu,&e replacement.
itions and to
y creates a
e. Routine
Construction\Professional Services
$93,426
$3,665
$7,985
$4,446
$1, $5,000
Expense Total
$93,426
$3,665
$7,985
$4,446
$5,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$93,426
$3,665
$7,985
$4,446
$1,159 $5,000
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$93,426
$3,665
$7,985
$4,446
$1,159 $5,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA
113
Packet Pg. 177
r '
F
- ' j 3
,L +•AIM _
Project Description_
This facility was built in 1965 to house ity's Public Works Departm nt, the building was converted in 1995 to
tenant space and City storage, as well monds Police large e ' rage. This is a vital piece of property
adjacent to the Waste Water Treatm ant, and could utility use if regulatory requirements
dictate. Building is primarily used as a and w' a upd to maintain current operational
readiness.
Projects: HVAC updates, roll -up door replacement, parkin
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to ass
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an e�
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pron
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$231,570
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
nd confidenq
kems to ope
$107,743
$24,308
$25,000
$25,000
$r
$25,000
$107,743
$24,308
$25,000
$25,000
$ 19
$25,000
$22,308
$30,000
$77,743
$24,308
$25,000
$25,000
$24,519
$25,000
$107,743
$46,616
$25,000
$25,000
$24,519
$25,000
Packet Pg. 178
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 114
0
Project Description
lo""
This facility was built in 1967 by Ed HL
foot facility now houses all City Facilit
seasonal help) This Facility is home to
shop and Parks and Facilities mainterli
Facility is near end of life and is under
who at the time was the C
rations staff(11) and
ity Carpentry
supply s e I as
d departm
Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational
replacement, Pine St. facility exit, exterior painting.
Project Benefit :�W
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to a s
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an ex ct
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promote
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$214,863
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square
and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+
ity Flower program, Parks engine repair
and Facilities Manager offices. This
staffing that are assigned to this facility.
tained facilit�
k confidence.
stems to operate
$70,789
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$6W8
$20,000
$70,789
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
$70,789
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
$70,789
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 115
Packet Pg. 179
•Y�
Project Description_
The Public Safety building houses Edm Police Department, Edmon s Municipal Court and the City Council
Chambers. The building was built in 19 compassing 30,000 of office, court and municipal
government uses. The building house of the City em ns centers, large police training,
simulator facilities and evidence pro g and st ildin had minimal system updates over it's
life and has a significant amount of de a and sho retrofitted with new fire sprinklers.
Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replace solar plant in n, parking lot
0
reconfiguration to meet current usage, fire sprinkler installati erior hallwa nd painting,
sleeping room remodel and gender specific/neutral accomm ns, gende ve pu trooms, operable
windows is specific locations, courts flat roof replacement.
Project Benefit -
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assures d property o g condition
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expecte ifespan. A well mai ained facility cr(
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. R
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to opera
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$1,297,964
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$50,967
$445,276
$55,169
$151,481
$515,071
$50,967
$445,276
$55,169
$151,481
$515,071
$445,276
$50,967
$55,169
$151,481
$515,071
$50,967
$445,276
$55,169
$151,481
$515,071
$80,000
$80,000
$80,000
$80,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA
116
Packet Pg. 180
Project Description
This building built in 1995 houses four c Works divisions and the
This building is 28,000 square feet and pable of operations
disasters. The building has significant red maintena
Projects: vehicle yard leveling, HVAC uNre of sysi
replacements, fire alarm system replace y re re
considerations, electric vehicle charging and maintenance
interior hallway flooring thresholds, utility bay HVAC replace
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to a s
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an ex ct
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promote
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$598,697
liary City Emergency Operations Center
fweather emergencies and natural
rastructure updates.
material bunkers, ventilation fan
remodel with ender inclusivity
re, emergen unications updates,
ter main r uilding connection)
tained facilit�
k
confidence.
ems to operate
Construction\Professional Services
$201,570
$218,643
$80,315
$79,348
$4W1
$50,000
Expense Total
$201,570
$218,643
$80,315
$79,348
$43,821
�'`0
$50,000 :
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$218,643
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$126,570
$80,315
3
a
General Fund
$25,000
d
Water Fund 421
$12,500
E
t
Stormwater Fund 422
$25,000
r
Sewer Fund 423
$12,500
Q
Unsecured Funding
$79,348
$43,821
$50,000
Funding Source Total
$201,570
$218,643
$80,315
$79,348
$43,821
$5 Packet Pg. 181
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
117
Project DescriptioM
This community theater was built by th ftwood Players theater g
ownership at a later date. The facility i 0 square feet in size
performances and City meetings. The maintenance
parking lot, roofing, and grounds.
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to as
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an ex
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which pror
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$324,163
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
in 1967 and was deeded to City
Fs the Driftwood Players theatrical
fre limited to large infrastructure,
nd prope
lifespan. A
workplac
provide
conditions and to
facility creates a
' ence. Routine
n erate as
$18,600
$99,077
$43,880
$115,734
$21,872 0
r5,000
$18,600
$99,077
$43,880
$115,734
$21,87
$18,600
$99,077
$43,880
$115,734
$21,872 $25,000
$18,600
$99,077
$43,880
$115,734
$21,872 $25,000
Packet Pg. 182
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA 118
r
—_
Ar
G
r
i
•f F ti i
s
Project Description
This recreational facility houses the Cit uatic programing and so
1971 the pool house historically was o perated seasonally. T
expanding to year round lap and tea atic activities a
programing. The facility requires min' mainten in op
of use.
Projects: security updates, roof replacement, gutter repla
replacements, operational repair and maintenance to accom
Project Benefit
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to a safe
assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an ex cte
safe work environment that is clean and sanitary which promote
and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and p
designed during manufacturer expected lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
$179,623
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$65,570 $26,128
$65,570 $26,128
$65,570
$26,128
$65,570 $26,128
rks and Recreation programs. Built in
run aquatic programing is currently
o support summer open swim
ial and is subject to tenant lease terms
imbing fixtu
365 opera
, exterior door
tained facilit�
k confidence.
stems to operate
$8,409 $19,127 $3W9 $30,000
$8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000
$8,409
$19,127 $30,389 $30,000
$8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000
2023-2028 CIP—CFP v0.4
Packet Pg. 183
Project Description
Funding Source Total
'rf
$60,000
T� 'f47
P ro taction�
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
120
Packet Pg. 184
S
Project Description `
0
Facilities will take on the responsibility utine maintenance at sever restroom structures. This L
maintenance will include Mechanical, Wical and Plumbing s
ell as building envelopes. These
structures have traditionally been ma' ed by Parks an
of these structures have significant
deferred maintenance and will be ad o the Fa ' '
ion
sment, for future planning purposes.
Project Benefit
Maintaining clean and safe Park restrooms helps show case
f Edmonds
, while meeting ADA
requirements for this type of public facility.
Estimated Project Cost
$305,000
ilm�
0 . 0 . 0
Construction\Professional Services $55,000 $50,000
$50,000
$25,000 $25,000 $100,000
Expense Total $55,000 $50,000
$50,000
$25,000 $25,000 $100
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $55,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $50,000
$50,000
Unsecured Funding
$25,000 $25,0 00,000
Funding Source Total $55,000 $50,000
$50,000
$25,000 $2 $100,000
Packet Pg. 185
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 121
� r
Project Descriptio
The City fleet is rapidly changing to el
installed once there is demand beyon
Project Benefit
Adding infrastructure in anticipation c
towards mostly electric vehicles.
Estimated Project Cost
$125,000
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
J;i iri:Jn': £I•._d:4'•.. , a
hicles, this conduit will a
rrent demand.
$125,000
$125,000
$125,000
$125,000
for new EV charging stations to be
to remain agile while the fleet evolves
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA 122
Packet Pg. 186
Project Descriptio
The large round gazebo has a very war
composite roof material in a similar pa
Project Benefit
The gazebo is a gathering place for grou ;
condition allows for more versatile use of
$50,000
r shake roof that is at en
Construction\Professional Services $50,000
Expense Total $50,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $50,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $50,000
Park,
2025
life. Roof will be replaced with
g this covered space in operational
2023-2028 CIP-CFP WA 123
Packet Pg. 187
Project Description
The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a g roof on the second floor
surface was waterproofed and remo1,,a
n 2003, since that pr
through the waterproof membrane. ter intrusion
not been deemed a project of signifipreviou est
intrusion and offered an initial ROM waterpr
plaza deck and replacement of landscape, s, gra em
separate construction project. The Parks Director in 2018
irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was per I
consequences from the years of water intrusion, building was E
factoring in to building structural stability.
Project Benefit
Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order t/
system. Preservation of the City's physical assets in appropriate co
capital investment.
Estimated Project Cost
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Services)
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
Jl�
he Edmonds Sno-Isle Library. The deck
uous water intrusion has occurred
fully mitigated over the years and has
pecialty Contractors inspected the water
e existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the
3shing and han railings would be a
timate to re ndscaping and
MLA En ' L
ver any structural
struct oundter intrusion not
ith Sno-Isle Lq
e facility and hi
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
124
Packet Pg. 188
6.A.b
WastawatPr TraatmPnt Plant Prniectc
#
CFP
.cCT
OP
56
20 2025
$300,000 $0 $0
2026 2027
$0 $0
2028
$0
TOTAL
(2022-2028)
$300,000
TOTAL
(2029-43)
$0
TOTAL Project
Cost
$300,000
PWP-04
Nutrient Removal Project
PWP-05
Prima Clarifer
54
$350,000 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$350,000
$0
$350,000
PWP-06
Joint Sealant
57
$60,000 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$60,000
$0
$60,000
PWP-07
Vacuum Filter
55
$187,453 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$187,453
$0
$187,453
Total Projects_
AV$897,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $897,453 $0 $897,453
Funding Source 2024
Edmonds Sewer Fund 423 $0
!237-1.,.
2025
2026
2027
2028
TOTAL
(2022.2028)
TOTAL
(2029.43)
TOTAL
$0
$0
$0
$0
$455,816
$0
$455,816
Mountlake Terrace , $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$207,940
$0
$207,940
E$20
OI m is View Water Sewer District $148,5 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$148,528
$0
$14Ci
of Shoreline $85, $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$85,168
$0
$85,168
Total Revenue
IV
$0 $897,453
R
.Q
R
U
C
fC
a
ILL
U_
c
R
a
N
d
�r
fC
ILL
l4
Q
l4
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
a
ILL
a
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
Co
N
y
Y
O
_v
3
a
c
a)
E
U
t0
Q
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 126
Packet P9. 190
Project Description
The WA Dept of Ecology has imposed
full-scale trial on the Nuvoda Process
discharged from the treatment plant.
results and modeling that will be corn
and construction in 2025.
Project Benefit
get Sound General Perm
determined that the
!quest is to b
in 202 n woy
Nutrient reductions have been imposed for our WWTP that t
exceeding our cap next year with the return of Edmonds Easi
once the cap is exceeded. The predesign effort will assist wA
the permit.
Estimated Project Cost
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$300,000
$152,370
$69,510
$49,650
$28,470
$300,000
)n us. We have conducted a preliminary
ill reduce the total nitrogen that is
the project based on the full-scale test
en be followed by full design in 2024
We anticipate
Ilan in place
knpliance with
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4
127
Packet Pg. 191
.'�'r�77f I W'i ff�IYir •:k 11�.��sar.
:A
' S Wr
Project Descriptio
se
The WWTP Annual Capital Replacem{
to ensure that the treatment plant is
Rehabilitation, Joint Sealant repairs a
$597,453.
J
i
ril
louse Projects is intended maintain infrastructure and equipment
aintained. Projects f ill include the WWTP Primary Clarifier 1
3cuum Filter. rojects are expected to be delivered for
Primary Clarifier #1 cage, center column, iow"rcor
arms need replacement due to severe corrosion. The stee
The limited access will require that pieces be assembled insi
Re -built it and CH Murphy. Both assessments were that the
Project Benefit
There is a new design that will improve performance of thqseep
ensure that a metal fatigue issue will not cause a catastrophic fa4
Estimated Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$350,000
$350,000
$177,765
$81,095
$57,925
$33,215
$350,000
Fe
r, counterwe
n replaced s'
ank. The co
ould be r
skimming device and rake
Lv
ginal construction.
e been inspected by
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 128
Packet Pg. 192
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$30,474
$13,902
$9,930
$5,694
$60,000
Packet Pg. 193
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 129
ISHIGAr
Project Descriptiori
The WWTP Annual Capital Replacem(
to ensure that the treatment plant is
Rehabilitation, Joint Sealant repairs a
$597,453.
louse Projects is intended maintain infrastructure and equipment
aintained. Projects f ill include the WWTP Primary Clarifier 1
3cuum Filter. rojects are expected to be delivered for
Vacuum Filter: When the Carbon Recover
Cfcom
current plan is to utilize the ash recovery system from the
either re -built or replaced. Due to the cost of a new vacuum
the biochar production utilize the existing filter to ensure pro
Project Benefit
A vacuum filter is designed to remove water from ash/bioc
marketable biochar.
Estimated Project Cost
$187,453
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$187,453
Expense Total
$187,453
Sewer Fund 423
$95,207
Mountlake Terrace
$43,433
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$31,023
City of Shoreline
$17,789
Funding Source Total
$187,452
plochar Aar
dewatered. The
tor. Ots of the system were
Jty staff ing that start-up of
eration P ent.
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 130
Packet Pg. 194
Packet Pg. 195
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 131
6.A.b
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023)
PROJECTS ADDED
Type
ROJECT NAM
CFP
DESCRIPTION
Transportation
2is Signal and Safety des
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
Pedestrian Safety Pr
jerwDr
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
OI Overlay - 196th / SR Talbot Rd
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
Citywide Lighting St
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
2023 Guardrail Pr
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
Green St 6th St. SW fr 9 to 236
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
Green Str Ave. S 4
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Water
2023 Waterline Overl
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements.
Water
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Re pg
Water
Phase 19 Annual Replace gram (20
Estimated future costs for waterline replacements.
Storm
2023 Stormwater Overlays
lEstimated future costs for road repairs due to storm replacements
Storm
7317 Lake Ballinger Way Purchase & Structure Re I
Estimated fu re costs for storm drainage project.
Storm
Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update
Esti costs for storm drainage project.
Sewer
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase
ate a costs for sewer project.
Sewer
2023 Sanitary Sewer Overlays
Estimat re costs for road repairs due to sewer line replacements.
WWTP
Primary Clarifier
ti uture costs for wa ater treatment plant project.
WWTP
Joint Sealant
future costs for r treatment plant project.
WWTP
Vacuum Filter
d future costs a atment plant project.
Facilities
Facilities
Fire Life Safety Communication
Parks Restrooms Maintenance
ated futur r facilities proje
mated f cilities project.
Facilities
Public Works EV Conduit Addition
timate costs ties project.
Facilities
City Park Gazebo Roof
Esti re costs for project.
Facilities
Library Plaza Deck
Esti future costs for facimWroject.
ca
U
c
to
a
LL
U_
c
to
a
m
v
to
LL
is
r
.Q
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
LL
U
d
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
N
Y
O
_v
a
c
CD
E
U
a
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 132
Packet Pg. 196
6.A.b
CFP /CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023)
'j �
PROJECTS REMOVED
Type
OJECT NAM
CFP
DESCRIPTION
Transportation
84th Av rla - 220th St SW 2th St SW
Completed
Transportation
2022 Guardrail Pro ra
Completed
Transportation
2022 Traffic Si naI U r
Completed
Transportation
ide Pedestrian Enhancem ro'ect
Completed
Water
2022 Waterline O
Completed
Water
eaview Res essmen
Completed
Storm
m Garden
Completed
Storm
2022 ormwater Overl
lCompleted
Storm
Phase 3 Annual Storm Re lacem
Com leted
Sewer
2022 Storm w rla s
Completed
Sewer
Citywide CIPP Sewer ReMbilitation Phase 4
WWTP
WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-house Pr
WWTP
Carbon Recovery Project
C
WWTP
City Park Odor Scrubber
d
G
ca
U
c
to
a
LL
U_
c
to
d
N
d
.v
m
LL
ms
r
.Q
U
co
N
O
N
eM
N
O
N-
IL
LL
U
d
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
N
Y
L
O
3
d
a+
C
d
L
V
R
r�
Q
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 133
Packet Pg. 197
6.A.b
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023)
PROJECTS REVISED
Type
ROJECT NAM
CFP
CHANGE
Transportation
Street Preservation m
2025 cost revised from $1,386,0000 to $1,500,000
Transportation
Transportation
76th Av erlay from 196th St. SW mpic View Dr.
uget Dr. @ OVD Signal U s
Addition of $15,000 construction cost to 2023
Cost and funding moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027
Transportation
I Upgrades - 100th Ave St. SW
Cost and funding moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027
Transportation
ain St. @ 3rd Sign des
Cost and funding moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
228th from Hwy 9 PI. W Cgd
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2027 to 2026-2028
Transportation
Hwy 99 y Project 2
Addition of $2,646,000 construction cost to 2023
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2026 to 2023-2027
Transportation
Hwy 99 Pi --vita ateway Pro' ge 3
Transportation
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway e 4
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2027 to 2023-2028
Transportation
SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - tion ements
Cost and funding revised, moved form 2025-2027 to 2026-2028
Transportation
Main St. @ 9th Ave. Inter proveme
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027
Transportation
76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW ection Improv
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2025 to 2023-2026
Transportation
SR-104 Adaptive Syste - 236th to 226th
Cost and funding revised for 2023 and 2025
Transportation
SR-104 @100th Ave W. Intersection Improvem
Cost a funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027
Transportation
SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvem
ding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027
Transportation
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improve
nding revised, moved from 2025-2026 to 2026-2027
Transportation
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improve
202 6 cost and funding removed, $3,231,000 cost and funding added to 2029-2043
Transportation
175th St SW Slope Repair
20 nstruction cost moved to 2026
Transportation
232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-1
C nd funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th A
and 2027 cost an ding revised
and 2027 cost revised
Transportation
84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW
Transportation
80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
st and fundin om 2025-2027 to 2026-2028
Transportation
80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
ost and fun ed, mo 2025-2026 to 2026-2027
Transportation
218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
Cost and f evised, moved 26-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave S
Cost a ed, moved fro to 2026
Transportation
216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W
Co§MlllMWW ding moved from 2T25 026
Transportation
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
funding re oved from 202 3
Transportation
Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW
and funding reviseaqWed from 2025-2 026-2028
Transportation
95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-2026 -2027
Transportation
Railroad St. Walkway from Dayton St. to Main St. / SR-104
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2025-202 27
Transportation
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Trans Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2
Transportation
Downtown Lighting Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 202 0 2026-
Transportation
SR-104 Walkway: HAWK to Pine / Pine from SR-104 to 9th
Cost and funding revised, moved from 7 to 2026-2028
Transportation
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
Cost and funding revised, moved fro -2042 to 2023
Transportation
Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St.
Cost and funding revised, move 25 to 2026
Transportation
Transportation Plan Update
2023 cost and funding Chang 185,000 to $1701000
.Q
�a
U
c
�a
a
Um
U_
c
to
a
N
m
v
to
LL
is
r
.Q
U
00
N
O
N
n
N
0
N
a
Um
U
d
U
00
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
N
Y
O
_v
Z
a
c
CD
E
t
U
R
a
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 134
Packet Pg. 198
6.A.b
P / CIP COMPARISON (2022 TO 2023)
qW PROJECTS REVISED
Type
OJECT NAM
CFP
CHANGE
Storm
Water Quaility I ements
Funding redistributed to include ARPA Funds
Storm
e Creek Restorati ase 1
rallinger
]Jger
Cost and funding extended to 2025 and 2026, ARPA Funds included
Storm
egional FacilityPhase
2023 cost and funding moved to 2024
Storm
Regional Facility Con n Phase
Cost revised from $6M to $3M, and moved from 2024 to 2025
Storm
S d Surface Water C nsive PI
Cost revised from $300,000 to $600,000, and moved from 2022 to 2023
Sewer
Sewer
Phase 9 proveme )
Annual Cit ewer Re n
$30,000 cost and funding added to 2023
Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised
Sewer
Lake Ballinger Sew
Cost and funding shifted from 2023-204 to 2024-2025
WWTP
Nutrient Remo ct
2024 cost and funding removed; 2023 cost and funding revised to $300,000
Facilities
Boys and Girls Club
Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
Cemetery Building
Six -ye cost and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
City Hall
t and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station
st and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
Frances Anderson Center
Six- ost and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
Fire Station 16
Si cost and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
Fire Station 17
r cost and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
Fire Station 20
ar cost and fund' 23-2028) revised
Facilities
Fire Life Safety Communications
ear cost and f -2028) revised
Facilities
Historic Log Cabin
-year cost an ( 28) revised
Facilities
Historical Museum
ix -year cost ing (20 revised
Facilities
Library
Six -year c unding (2023- ised
Facilities
Meadowdale Club House
Six -ye ing (2023-202 ed
Facilities
Old Public Works
Six- t and (2023-2028) r vis
Facilities
Parks Maintenance Building
cost and fun 23-2028) revis
Facilities
Public Safety
ear cost and fundin 3-2028) revised
Facilities
Public Works O&M
Six -year cost and funding ( 023-2028) revised
Facilities
Wade James Theater
Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revised
Facilities
Yost Pool House
I Six -year cost and funding (2023-2028) revise
.Q
�a
U
c
to
a
u_
U_
c
to
d
N
m
v
M
u-
M
r
.Q
U
00
N
O
N
M
N
O
N
IL
u_
U
d
U
00
N
0
N
M
N
0
N
N
Y
0
_v
a
c
CD
E
U
a
2023-2028 CIP-CFP v0.4 135
Packet Pg. 199
7.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/26/2022
Comprehensive Plan Visioning Summary
Staff Lead: Kernen Lien
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Kernen Lien
Background/History
The City of Edmonds kicked of the community visioning process for the Comprehensive Plan update with
a six -week themed outreach over the summer. Over 8,500 comments were received via survey, email
and in person commentary throughout the process, which included a range of activities in different
areas throughout the City.
City staff and the PRR consultant team cataloged all comments and organized them into eight
overarching themes chosen for capability with the Comprehensive Plan elements. The overarching
themes are:
Community Culture
Urban Design
Economic Development
Housing
Land Use
Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
Transportation
Other (for comments that could not be reliably categorized)
In collaboration with PRR, City staff will draft community vision and value statements, informed by what
we heard through the visioning process. Finalizing a vision and value statement will be an iterative
process, with feedback from the community, Planning Board, and City Council. However, as the vision is
reviewed and refined, it will be important to stay consistent with the initial 8,500 comments to be held
accountable for the collective view and to remain inclusive and representative. The final statements will
guide development of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Staff will provide a presentation on results from this summer's community visioning process. This is an
opportunity for the Edmonds community to hear results from the visioning process and for staff to
receive feedback from City Council regarding which community values are important to highlight as a
vision statement is drafted.
Some key takeaways have been identified as a result of PRR's cataloging and analysis. These include:
Maintain the City of Edmonds' small-town atmosphere
Packet Pg. 200
7.A
Assess building style per neighborhood, including affordable housing for middle income
households
Increase diversity and engage people outside of Downtown Edmonds
Maintain and restore the environment, specifically trees and marshland
Increase walkability and access to public transit
The draft vision statement will be revealed on November 5t" during an event called Porchfest Edmonds,
which will be held downtown in partnership with the Reimagining Neighborhood and Streets core group
downtown stakeholders. Activities will be provided at the event to solicit community feedback. We also
intend to take the vision and value statements to citywide neighborhoods, particularly ones that have
been historically under -represented, with an approach that 'meets people where they are' with events
such as attending community hosted/sponsored meetings, tabling at grocery stores and other
community gathering places.
Online participation will also be provided for people unable to attend an in -person event.
Attachments:
Edmonds Visions Survey Summary
Packet Pg. 201
7.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS COMP PLAN VISION
"Everyone's Edmonds" Public Survey Overview
10/10/2022
In preparation for the update to the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, city staff sought to gather
public input from across the city. The City of Edmonds staff distributed surveys across the city to gather
insight on people's current experiences and ideas for the future of Edmonds to see where the upcoming
Comprehensive Plan update should focus. Surveys were promoted online and posters with a QR Code
were hung throughout the city at key gathering spaces. Surveys were available through Survey Monkey
using a combination of multiple choice and short answer questions. In -person outreach was conducted
at events and meetings using a written survey form. A full list of questions and a workbook of all survey
questions is available to view individual responses. Key themes from each of the surveys are described
below by topic.
Process
Six mini surveys, each focusing on different topics, gathered respondents' insight, aspirations, and
concerns for the City of Edmonds' future. The topics referred to: identity, quality of life, economic
growth, environment, culture, and livability and land use. Each survey had two to four questions that
included both qualitative (open ended, written response) and quantitative (multiple choice) input. Mini
surveys were time limited and available to the public for one week at a time. At the conclusion of each
week a full, combined survey was offered while a new mini survey on the next topic became available.
This City staff chosen strategy aimed to increase engagement and make posters advertising the mini
surveys evergreen.
TopicsSurvey
Week 1 Identity <iump to section>
.. .-
135
Week 2 Quality of Life <iump to section>
120
Week 3 Economic Growth <iump to section>
50
Week 4 Environment <iump to section>
75
Week 5 Culture <iump to section>
54
Week 6 Livability and Land Use <iump to section>
104
Full survey
536
Events and conversations (written) <iump to section>
410
Tally
1584
Input from surveys with open-ended response questions were categorized, as much as possible, into
eight key themes which were chosen for compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan focus areas as
defined by the Edmonds planning team. Some surveys have additional subcategories to capture the full
breadth of information. Overarching themes are:
- Community Culture and Urban Design
- Community Sustainability
- Economic Development
- Housing
- Land Use
Packet Pg. 202
7.A.a
Parks & Recreation and Open Spaces
- Transportation
- Unknown (other)
Participation by neighborhood
Neighborhood identifiers were offered for online survey along with an "Other" category with the option
to write in a neighborhood not listed. A majority of respondents to online surveys selected the
neighborhood location of Downtown Edmonds "the "Bowl" (375) followed by Westgate (105) and
Seaview (85). 101 respondents selected other, with a strong presence from Maplewood.
The following table does not include locations of respondents from 'live" conversations written comments.
Downtown Edmonds
(the "Bowl")
Week
50
Week
47
Week
18
Week
,
38
Week
5
14
Week
6
30
Full
Survey
177
Tally
374
Esperance
(unincorporated
county)
3
2
0
0
1
5
21
32
Firdale
6
2
0
2
1
5
10
26
Five Corners
12
11
2
5
8
8
29
75
Highway 99
6
3
3
1
2
5
12
32
Lake Ballinger
3
3
2
3
1
3
14
29
Meadowdale
2
3
1
1
1
3
14
25
Perrinville
7
4
1
3
1
4
20
40
Pine Ridge
5
7
3
2
4
4
15
40
Seaview
7
11
6
6
5
11
39
85
Sherwood Forest
2
3
2
1
2
3
10
23
Talbot Park
0
2
2
1
1
1
2
9
Town of Woodway
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
Maplewood
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
0
0
Westgate
17
9
5
4
5
12
53
105
1 do not live in
Edmonds
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
8
Other
14
12
5
8
8
8
46
101
No answer
67
Tally (no "live"
comments)
135
120
50
75
54
104
536
1074
Locations identified in the "other" comments include Emerald Hills, Gateway/99&104, Lynwood, Madrona,
Maplewood, Macrons, North of Woodway, Olympic between Main and Caspers, Point Edwards, Richmond Beach,
South side, south near Woodway Yost Park, University Colony, Uptown, West of WINCO, 238th & Edmonds Way,
240th/104 South Edmonds.
Packet Pg. 203
7.A.a
Week 1 Identity: What does Edmonds mean to you?
Q1: What do you love about Edmonds
Key themes
- Edmonds has a walkable "small town charm" with access to waterfront and nature, pretty
views, and quiet neighborhoods with trees where children can play.
- Respondents commented positively on the recreation available in Edmonds and its walkability,
especially in the downtown core.
- Respondents commented on the value of the small businesses of Edmonds, especially the feel of
a historic small town with a bustling center, local shops, restaurants and a thriving arts and
culture scene.
Q2: How would you like to see your values reflected in Edmonds
Key themes
- Community Sustainability was a large category with comments highlighting both environmental
sustainability and community health.
o Environmental sustainability focused on environmental protection and climate change
of which respondents mentioned the importance of restoring and maintaining habitat,
protecting the watershed and marine life, reduced impact of land development, and an
increased tree canopy
o Community Health reflected some respondents' desires to see more diversity of people,
community non -profits supported, law enforcement protected, volunteerism fostered,
and members of the unhoused community supported. Others expressed the desire to
keep Edmonds the same as it is with no change.
- Respondents commented on the economic and governmental future of the City and made
specific remarks regarding the City's management of infrastructure funds (police, fire,
emergency services, social service) and accountability to businesses.
- There were disparate comments regarding the development of Edmonds: many respondents
opposed high -density and high-rise buildings in favor of land preservation and small-scale
neighborhood buildings. Affordable housing for all income levels was a recurring comment.
- Many responses support better connectivity of neighborhoods through public transportation,
bike lanes, and sidewalks.
- Multiple commenters include encouragement to create opportunities for a more equitable,
inclusive, welcoming, and culturally diverse city. This includes requests for more community
events, increased social services, and support for small businesses outside of the "Bowl".
Packet Pg. 204
7.A.a
Week 2 Quality of life: Why do you live or play in Edmonds?
Q1- What do you like about living in Edmonds? Select all that apply
120 respondents (mini survey), 509 respondents full survey
600
500
400
� W�I�_..�I�IIII
41
cGey y\opo \ �i`°� `eBret
e5o� a`ot�` °�� O r°� eo \�ao anti �o 0QQ tea° O
t t� 0 0� o� spot �a o� �° er o�
�� C.° L°yam Joey a�a :�•o`le �a
ayet� °��
o a�\oo
Ile
\Gate a
PGc
Key themes
Within the option of "other", comments included appreciation of the arts and culture scene, symphony,
and library, proximity and access to natural resources and environment, parks and trails, walkability and
cleanliness, events and farmers markets, infrastructure (public utilities and police, emergency services),
and a sense of community. Access to natural resources and beauty were the most frequent comments
along with Edmonds' proximity to a large metropolitan area, Seattle, while still having a "small town"
feel.
Q2: Is there anything you don't like about Edmonds
Key themes
Transportation and walkability - Many comments referred to Edmonds being car -centric, a lack
of sidewalks, and the need for improved walkability/bike-ability along with more transit options.
Street safety and its implications for the safety of pedestrians and cyclists was mentioned often.
Additionally, respondents talked about the need for better public transportation, specifically if
you are not a Seattle 9-5 commuter. The subcategory "automotive" was used to group recurring
themes of speeding, traffic, and parking.
a. Motorists that speed make roadways dangerous for drivers and non -drivers
b. There is not enough parking in some neighborhoods, while there is too much parking in
certain neighborhoods making them unwalkable. Parking needs to be assessed
specifically by neighborhood needs.
Packet Pg. 205
7.A.a
c. Navigating traffic is difficult and seems to begetting worse, and the ferry traffic often
exacerbates the current conditions.
2. Government -There is an overall expression that local government does not equitably distribute
funding and there is not enough investment in areas outside of "the Bowl". Comments included
opinions that there is a lack of governmental transparency and accountability, problematic lack
of agreement within government, and that only select, privileged communities are listened to.
3. Many respondents acknowledged that the lack of diversity in Edmonds was an issue, while
others expressed resistance to change.
4. There is a mixed response to the Land Capacity of Edmonds, with some respondents saying that
increased density is something they dislike, and some saying there is not enough housing.
5. The impact of urbanism on environment was expressed with concerns about trees (lack of, care
of existing, trees too big and blocking views) and preservation and restoration of marshland.
Access to pools is mentioned frequently as related to both recreation and increasing climate
temperatures.
6. Many respondents expressed that housing is not affordable for low- and middle -income
households, young families, singles, and seniors. Some responders are concerned that there will
be fewer single-family homes built and an increasing focus on condos that disrupts the small-
town atmosphere.
7. Comments included concern about the increasing number of people who are unhoused.
8. Increased cost of living as a whole and specifically increased rents for commercial business that
make it difficult for small business owners was a concern. Recurring comments on the condition
of the Highway 99 area and the need for investment in this vital commercial corridor were
prominent.
9. Concerns were expressed about recent increases of crime.
Q3: How long have you lived in Edmonds? 120 respondents mini survey, 509 respondents full survey
Residency in years
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1
Less than 1 1-2 3-5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 25 26 - 35 36 - 50 More than I do not live
50 in Edmonds
Packet Pg. 206
7.A.a
Week 3: Help us plan Edmonds' economic future!
Q1: What kind of businesses (goods and services) do you travel outside the city for?
Key themes
1. Lynwood and University Village are destinations for shopping. Specific mentions of retailers
included Alderwood Mall, Central Market, Costco, Fred Meyer, Home Depot, JoAnn's Fabrics,
Lowe's, Macy's, Nordstrom, Office Depot, REI, Target, Trader Joe's, and Whole Foods.
2. Respondents expressed the sentiment that big -box and large retail stores are not needed in
Edmonds — it's ok to travel for some things.
Goods and services sought outside of the city
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
,
r
6
� e
oe�a `e��5 `ate
ea
�o�e ee
a
o�a\ye �ey�aJ
5`
s�ey
Qto
"General Purposes" is the most common category for goods and services sought outside the city. Within
that category, the following are notable comments:
• Air travel
• Community: religious centers and houses of worship, cultural connection, LGBTQIA+
• Daycare/nursery
• Education — STEM, tutoring
• Ethnic grocers, and household goods
• Entertainment — music performances, theater, museums, theaters, sporting events, kid's
entertainment
• Parks, athletics, pools, gyms, sports leagues, dance class
• Auto service, tires
Packet Pg. 207
7.A.a
• Library, books
• Major purchases — household furnishings, electronics, appliances, vehicles
• Salon: hair, nails, massage
• Sporting and camping goods, craft supplies, specialty hobby supplies, cycling supplies and repair
• Restaurants —ethnic, vegan, sushi, fine dining
• Veterinarian / pet care
Q2: Do you work in Edmonds? 50 respondents mini survey, 477 respondents full survey
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
yes
no
Q2: If you don't work in Edmonds, what kind of work do you leave the city for?
Employment sought outside of the city
140
120
100
80
60
40
20 ■ 1 ■
I
I _ _
■ 1 ■ 1
1
`J\C; �*�°���tac�����a\�r`atete�a�e'�eQa�t �e�a�yia\°�e`,\`e�e�etaa\o�e�\tea Dere
O°�5 �e `\C.a ace' a�� az
a� C-P° ey5 ah ��a a`Fe �Neo\p
,Jao\°�,Leo Qto �e
�Jo` \°o �ap�e
O°�
\o 01
O
Packet Pg. 208
7.A.a
Key themes
Many respondents to the question of employment location do not work in Edmonds with almost half of
non -employed respondents citing "retired". Neighborhoods largely represented by retirees include
Downtown Edmonds (the "Bowl"), Seaview, Five Corners, and Westgate.
The following categories have notable subcategories:
• Education: schoolteacher, professor, education support staff, library
• Healthcare: physician, nursing, tech, speech therapist, research, dentist, radiology/imaging
• Office management and administration: administrative, analyst, corporate, environment,
general office work, human resources, real estate, non-profit, management, program
management, wealth management, urban planner
• Other / general: art, retail, restaurant/food service/bar
• Tech: bio, digital, mechanical, medical, research, science, software
Packet Pg. 209
7.A.a
Week 4: Environment: What can we do to reduce Edmonds'
environmental impact?
Within the topic of Environment, subcategories included:
- Affordable Housing
- Automotive
- Bicycling
- Climate Change - Global warming, heat, wildfires, air quality
- City Revenues - Equitable investments in community, the City's control of environmental plans,
natural disaster preparedness
- Green Space - tree coverage
- Land Capacity - Overpopulation, population density, unsustainable development, development
in general, zoning, density in general
- Open Space - untouched land
- Other — no answer, nothing of concern, or an answer that did not align with other categories
- Parks
- Public Transportation
- Renewable Infrastructure - Carbon footprints, renewable energy, greenhouse gas emissions,
compost, recycling, EVs
- Vegetation and Wildlife
- Water Protection - Clean water supply, rising sea levels, natural resource protection, pollution
and contamination, stormwater runoff, Puget Sound health, Edmonds Marsh
Q1: Which of these four proposed priorities of the Edmonds Climate Action Plan should the City put
the most resources toward? (rank in order of importance from one to four, with the most important
being one) 75 respondents mini survey, 486 respondents full survey
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Rank 1-4
Buildings and energy Transportation Environment Lifestyles and
consumption
Packet Pg. 210
7.A.a
Key themes
Environment has the highest ranking with an average of 2.8, followed closely by buildings and energy
with an average ranking of 2.6
Q2 What are you most concerned about when it comes to the environmental future of Edmonds?
Key themes
The category of "Water Protection" was the most common theme, embodying the community's
concern over rising sea levels, protection of local streams and water sources, and pollution of
watersheds from littering and untreated stormwater runoff. A common note among those citing
water as a primary concern was the Edmonds Marsh and the desire to see it returned to a
healthy estuary.
Another highly common theme was "Green Space," and reference to Edmonds' tree canopy.
Many respondents expressed disappointment to see trees cut down in favor of development
and want to see trees planted or replaced. It is important to note comments from other
surveys include "right tree, right place" thinking (trees that -are too large for the space or block
viewsheds.)
In the category of "Land Capacity" population density is a leading theme. There are divergent
opinions over whether density is a solution or a problem. Most commonly, respondents
considered increased density in zoning, population, and development to be harmful to the
environment, often naming increased cars, traffic, and climate refugees as an outcome. Others
saw density as a solution, citing the opportunity for more walkable communities and sustainable
buildings as an outcome.
Packet Pg. 211
7.A.a
Week 5 Culture: Help us better understand Edmonds' diversity!
Q1: Do you feel like your ethnicity and culture are represented in Edmonds? What ethnicity(s) and
culture(s) would you like to see better represented in Edmonds
Key themes
Many responses were left blank, but for those that responded, most common answer was yes,
their culture is represented. Of those yeses that provided further detail, a large majority
respondent group self -identified as white.
The category "Needs more" was included to highlight those who did not self -identify themselves
as feeling represented/not represented, and only commented on which cultures they think need
better representation and how. Of those, "all non -white cultures" were named the most, and
the second highest identified were Indigenous/Native American cultures.
A significant number of respondents declined to answer the question, commenting that the
question is divisive and/or that the government should not be asking.
Q2: What can the City do to better celebrate diverse cultures?
Key themes
Respondents requested that the City thoughtfully partner with ethnic and cultural minority
communities to host more events that honor holidays that aren't in the white dominant culture
and to think of creative ways to honor cultural presence through events, fairs, festivals, public
artwork, signage, programs for youth, and cultural centers.
The "City revenues" category related to various government structure solutions that the City
could take on to address diversity, such as improving hiring practices, increasing diverse
representation in elected or appointed positions, supporting small businesses, installing
streetscape design that acknowledges culture, heritage, and language, and developing
partnerships with community- based organizations.
Packet Pg. 212
7.A.a
Week 6 Livability and Land Use: What should Edmonds offer the next
generation?
Q1: What types of housing could you see fitting into your neighborhood? Select all that apply. 104
respondents mini survey, 467 respondents full survey
Housing
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
1500
0
—
`5 ,\ e0
0L�
\\A ��Q JtQ �e ��o `�ti air r
� y
a�\e °,,Je�et `ode
to yy 0`� ey e� �a ,��Qo
Pao V`; Ae a°
�oc �S`
rea h
a�
O
tee+
o� �r° ��.�
pr
Key themes
Single family homes is the most frequently selected category for desired housing followed by interest in
accessory dwelling units, multigenerational homes, and townhouses. Of the selected preference for
single family homes, about half of the responses (211 of 436) were from residents in Downtown
Edmonds (the "Bowl").
Comments in "other" included thoughts on building style appropriateness for specific neighborhoods,
concerns on environmental impact and tree canopy, ability to accommodate parking, regulation of
vacation rental housing (AirBnB) and concerns that existing road size could not accommodate more
residents or traffic.
Preferences trend toward two themes 1) single family, low -density, low-rise and 2) affordability for
young adults, singles, and people down -sizing.
Location..
Downtown Edmonds (the "Bowl") 211
Esperance(unincorporated county) 16
Firdale 10
Packet Pg. 213
7.A.a
Five Corners
29
Highway 99
9
Lake Ballinger
11
Meadowdale
12
Perrinville
18
Pine Ridge
15
Seaview
43
Sherwood Forest
6
Talbot Park
3
Town of Woodway
2
Maplewood
Not
optioned
Westgate
50
Q: 2 What type of businesses, services, community features and public spaces would you like to see in
your neighborhood? Select all that apply. 104 respondents (mini survey) 478 respondents full survey
Livability
450
400
350
300
250 -
200 —
150
1500 I
0
e t 8'
e e(2' to 0 CV `�`� Qat
�yQ oe'� yo at �t hit y�o oe� to 5ea
ota �r to 5� oa et
°�
t�ya w`°� �a
P \A\`e0
�x"tea
Key themes
The most selected category for businesses, services, community features and public spaces that people
would like to see in their neighborhoods are walking/biking trails followed by more parks, more small
restaurants/bars/coffee shops, and greener streets.
Q3. What else could improve your neighborhood?
Key themes
Packet Pg. 214
7.A.a
1. Walkability including more sidewalks and maintenance/repair of existing sidewalks, lighting,
crosswalks for people using assisted mobility devices, strollers, and for dog walkers.
2. Road maintenance and road safety. Traffic calming measures and safer roadways to reduce
speeding, increase pedestrian and cyclist safety, including noise reduction and traffic alleviation.
3. More public space or the improvement of existing public space. Maintaining a healthy tree
canopy, more green space throughout public spaces, spaces for families with young children,
walking trails, parks, and indoor gathering spaces.
4. Keep a local, small-town atmosphere.
Packet Pg. 215
7.A.a
Written responses
Key themes by category:
1) Transportation
a. Public Transportation: People want more public transportation options with easy access and
fewer connections.
b. Automotive: Attitudes diverge regarding parking - some think more public parking should be
provided and others want less. Traffic safety and ferry traffic congestion are concerns.
Walking: People want more and better sidewalks, and an increase in pedestrian connectivity
especially in the Highway 99 Corridor.
Bicycling: People want more and safer bike lanes/routes.
2) Land Use
a. Land Capacity Summary: Opinions diverge between wanting more density, and those who
want to see Edmonds' zoning and land use stay the same, especially in the "Bowl" and
downtown.
b. Housing Summary: A large number of respondents indicated interest in Middle Housing
options (infill in Single Family zones) as housing is becoming increasingly more unaffordable.
Many people expressed that younger people and people with low and middle incomes
cannot afford to live in the City.
3) Community Sustainability
a. Community Health: People expressed appreciation of public engagement and the sense of
community they feel as a part of Edmonds. Most feel like Edmonds is safe but have concerns
about people who are experiencing homelessness (unhoused).
b. Environmental Protection: People want to preserve and increase tree canopy and protect
beaches and marshland.
4) Parks and Recreation and Open Space: People are interested in more amenities for dog owners,
continued investment on the waterfront and beach, and overall resources for marshland, fishing,
boating, parks, and playgrounds. More transportation access to parks was mentioned frequently,
5) Community Culture and Urban Design
a. Arts and Culture: People acknowledged the vibrant arts community and strong downtown
restaurant culture. People expressed a desire for more diversity in the arts, including youth
involvement, indigenous people's involvement, and access to art outside the "Bowl".
b. Urban Design: People love the design of Downtown Edmonds and want to preserve the
"small town feel" that street frontages and low building heights provide.
6) Diversity Summary: Respondents expressed that the City of Edmonds is not celebrating diversity as
much as it could - some demographics are overlooked, especially younger families. Many people
also perceive a lack of representation for residents who live outside the "Bowl" and an overall lack
of connectivity to the cultural diversity of the Hwy 99 corridor.
7) Economic Development: Respondents expressed that there is a lot of focus on restaurants and
places that are already highly invested in, and there is concern about commercial rents being too
high, leading to fear that commercial space may disappear as traditional brick -and -mortar
businesses change.
Packet Pg. 216
7.A.a
Key takeaways
Recurring themes expressed in all six surveys include:
1. Maintain the City of Edmonds' small-town atmosphere
2. Assess building style per neighborhood, include affordable housing for middle income
households
3. Increase diversity and engage people outside of Downtown Edmonds ("the Bowl")
4. Maintain and restore the environment, specifically trees and marshland
5. Increase walkability and access to public transit
Packet Pg. 217
8.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/26/2022
Development Code Update Work Plan
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Background/History
This is a new item for the Planning Board. Staff introduced the topic to Council on September 27.
Staff Recommendation
Staff will present the proposed plan for the development code modernization work and discuss a
proposal for a minor change code amendment process.
Narrative
As part of the code update process, staff is proposing to update Chapter 20.80 ECDC (Text and Map
Changes) to create a new process for minor code amendments. Minor amendments would have a
streamlined process to make small code changes that would promote clarity, eliminate redundancy,
streamline processes, and correct inconsistencies.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Development code update slides 10.26.22
Attachment 2 - PB draft ECDC 20.80 Text and Map Changes_minor amendment
Packet Pg. 218
8.A.a
E
Development Code -
Modernization a
W
d
a+
Work Plan
V
O
E
CL
0
E
Mike Clugston AICP, Senior Planner��,
_ Q
Development Services Department
c
m
Edmonds Planning Board E
October 26, 2022
Packet Pg. 219
8.A.a
Presentation Objective
1. Provide briefing on proposed work plan
2. Identify staff resources
3. Define "code rewrite"
4. Describe phased approach to process
5. Present timeline
Packet Pg. 220
8.A.a
Purpose of Development Codes
• Comply with the GMA
• Implement the Comprehensive Plan
• Evolve to meet changing municipal, state
& federal requirements
Packet Pg. 221
tory
• 1959: First zoning ordinance
• 1980: Code reorganized to current ECDC
format
• Hundreds of zoning and development code
amendments since
• Some previous consultant efforts have been
done in "fits and starts" due to lack of
dedicated staff ability to support extensive
legislative changes
Packet Pg. 222
8.A.a
staff Resources
0
>
• Dedicated FTE to manage code (issue identification, process
N
N
improvements, plan concurrence), lead legislation and work
with consultants, as needed N
• Collaborate with in house subject matter experts
• Budget for on -call services
0
0
r
C
t
V
fC
r
Q
r-i
C
d
L
8.A.a
�efinin� "rndpRewrite„
• Iterative process of improvements to the Edmonds
development codes
• Includes changes to both structure and content
• Ensures code is representative of best practice
• Offers both flexibility and predictability to
developers, design professionals and contractors
• Is outcome focused and mindful of implications -
either physical, socioeconomic or environmental
Code Work Growth
Management Act
Council/Administration
Issue Identification
Shoreline State
Management Stormwater
Act Mandates
State
Building
Code
8.A.a
ImmpdoI
a+P Structural Changp-,,-
• Reorganize Titles 15 - 24 to be more accessible and usable
• Improve search and interactive functions (Code Publishing)
• Complete first round of improvements by end of 2022
8.A.a
Con' -` Change
New amendment process types:
minor and major
• Council (and staff) want a responsive
process that responds to policy decisions
• Implemented through changes to ECDC
20.80
Overall changes:
• Use plain language
• Replace words with graphics and
illustrations
• Eliminate unnecessary code
v
Packet Pg. 226
8.A.a
ra u9 -0.4 �O
ent M i nor Amendments
qr_
E
CL
O
• Create streamlined process for minor updates
>
N
N
• Promote clarity, eliminate redundancy, streamline processes,
better align with best practices
• Correct inconsistencies and scrivener's errors
0
• Would be presented directly to Council on a semi-annual basis
E
OL
(December/June) or more frequently as needed
0
• Proposed change to ECDC 20.80 in packet for discussion r
E
U
Q
w
U
R
Q
Packet Pg. 227
Major Amendment;,,
• These take time
• Need to be thorough with detailed data/analysis
• Inclusive public engagement
• Required process through GMA and our own code
8.A.a
m
0
U
0
E
a
0
m
0
N
N
tD
N
O
.N
0
d
E
CL
O
0
E
Q
w
d
E
Packet Pg. 228
8.A.a
Examples
Minor Majo
Remove references to "CG2" code
• Zoning district no longer exists
• No policy impact; not controversial
EV charging infrastructure requirements
(ECDC 17.115)
• Large policy impact, important to the
development community
Development Code Modernization Snapshot
8.A.a
7/23/21
Comprehensive Plan Update
Comp Plan Start
6/1/22
i
i
i
i
i
2/8/22 1 1 8/
Minor Code
Amendment
Provision
Adopted,
12/31/22
i
i
i
Minor Code
Omnibus#1,
6/30/23(PLN)
BD Designated Street Front (PLN)
Timeline Wireless (ENG/PLN)
CG Stepbacks(PLN)
Minor Code Amend Process (PLN)
Structural Reorganization (PLN)
Trees (minor/major) (PLN)
ROW Permits/Utility Wiring
Building Code Update
Street/Sidewalk Stds (ENG/PLN)
Critical Aquifer Recharge (PLN)
Five Corners Code
►i
10/1/23
Minor Code
Omnibus #2,
12/21123
(PLN)
v
i
i
i
i
Minor Code
Omnibus #3,
6/30/24(PLN)
Comp Plan Adopted
v 12/31/24
i
4/18/24 11/4/24
Packet Pg. 230
8.A.a
Thank you.
Questions?
Comments?
Image Credits
• Washington by Tyler Gobberdiel from thenounproject.com
• Buffer by Creative Stall from thenounproject.com
Packet Pg. 231
8.A.b
DRAFT Chapter 20.80
TEXT AND MAP CHANGES
Sections:
20.80.000
Scope.
20.80.010
Procedural and nonzoning related changes.
20.80.015
Minor zoning code and map amendments.
20.80.020 Maior zoning code and map amendments.ZeR*Rg and ^'^R^gRg ehaRges
20.80.030 Pre -Annexation zoning.
20.80.000 Scope.
This chapter sets forth the procedure for amendment to the text and any applicable maps
adopted by and within the community development code, but does not apply to other chapters
of the Edmonds City Code. Because various provisions of the community development code
are adopted under different state regulations, this chapter is divided into twe three basic
divisions as set forth below.
20.80.010 Procedural and nonzoning related changes.
Amendments to the following text materials (and where applicable, maps and other
incorporated codes or codifications within them) shall be reviewed and made by the city council
and may be adopted in the same manner as any other ordinances. The city council may refer a
proposal to the planning advisory board, or other board, commission, committee, staff, or
other ad hoc group for its or their nonbinding recommendations.
A. ECDC 15.00.020, Application Fees;
B. ECDC Title 18, Public Works Requirements, except Chapter 18.50, Official Street Map;
C. ECDC Title 19, Building Codes;
D. Chapter 20.15A ECDC, Environmental Review (SEPA);
E. Chapter 20.70 ECDC, Street Vacations.
20.80.015 Minor development code and map amendments.
A. Intent. This process is used by City Council to review and decide on minor development
code and map amendments. It is a streamlined process used for proposed changes which
need little or no policy study.
B. Suitability. This process is used for:
L:\ECDC_Rewrite\AMD2022-0005, ECDC 20.80 Text_Map Changes\10.26.22 PB intro\draft ECDC 20.80
Text and Map Changes_minor amendment edits v2.rtf
Packet Pg. 232
8.A.b
1. Minor development code amendments to promote clarity, eliminate redundancy,
correct scrivener's errors, or to correct inconsistencies; and
2. Minor zoning map amendments to correct grammatical, labeling, scriveners, or similar
errors on the official zoning map.
C. Review process. The Development Services Director periodically prepares a package of
amendments for review and presents them to the City Council on their consent agenda.
At its discretion. the Council mav:
1. Approve the entire package; or
2. Remove one or more of the proposed amendments from consent for additional
discussion about the suitability of an amendment for the minor process or remove an
amendment from the minor process roster altogether for processing as a major
amendment as described in ECDC 20.80.020 and then apDrove the remainder of the
package.
20.80.020 Major zoning code and map amendmentsZeningand planning changes.
A. Review. Amendments to the following text materials (and where applicable, maps and other
incorporated codes or codifications within them) before amendment by the city council shall
first be reviewed by the planning advisory board as a Type V decision using the purposes and
criteria set forth in the applicable chapters as the basis for its review and recommendations:
1. ECDC Title 15, Land Use Plans and Policies, except application and permit fees.
2. ECDC Title 16, Zone Districts.
3. ECDC Title 17, General Zoning Regulations.
4. ECDC Title 20, Review Criteria and Procedures, excluding:
a. Chapter 20.15A ECDC, Environmental Review (SEPA);
b. Chapter 20.70 ECDC, Street Vacations.
5. Chapter 18.50 ECDC, Official Street Map.
B. Notice. See ECDC 20.03.003.
C-20.80.030. Pre -Annexation Zoning.
When the city council, in its discretion, deems it appropriate to adopt pre -annexation zoning
comparable to that in effect in Snohomish County for a proposed annexation area, the
procedural and notice requirements of RCW 35A.14.340 shall control over the provisions of this
L:\ECDC_Rewrite\AMD2022-0005, ECDC 20.80 Text_Map Changes\10.26.22 PB intro\draft ECDC 20.80
Text and Map Changes_minor amendment edits v2.rtf
Packet Pg. 233
8.A.b
chapter and Chapter 20.03 ECDC. In the event that the city council determines it appropriate to
zone property proposed for annexation to the city in a category which is not comparable to
zoning in effect in Snohomish County, the provisions of this chapter and Chapter 20.03 ECDC
shall apply. Any change to pre -annexation zoning proposed after annexation to the city shall
also comply with the provisions of this chapter and Chapter 20.03 ECDC. [Ord. 3817 §§ 13, 14,
2010; Ord. 3736 § 69, 2009; Ord. 3112 § 20, 1996; Ord. 3080 § 1, 1996].
L:\ECDC_Rewrite\AMD2022-0005, ECDC 20.80 Text_Map Changes\10.26.22 PB intro\draft ECDC 20.80
Text and Map Changes_minor amendment edits v2.rtf
Packet Pg. 234
9.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/26/2022
Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: Kernen Lien
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Kernen Lien
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review Extended Agenda
Narrative
Extended Agenda attached.
Attachments:
10.20.2022 Extended Agenda
Packet Pg. 235
Of F QAf
PLAKHMS BOARD
Extended Agenda
October 20, 2022
November 2022
Items and Dates are subject to change
Nov 1 1.
Joint meeting with City council
Nov 9 1.
Civic Park Rules
Nov 23 1.
No Meeting - Day before Thanksgiving
Nov 30 Special Meeting
1.
Code Modernization Process and Updates to Chapter 20.80 ECDC
Public Hearing
2.
Tree Board Joint Meeting
December 2022
Dec 14 1. Election of Officers
2. Wireless Update — Work Session
3. Tree Code Update
January 2023
Jan 11 1.
Jan 25 1. Comprehensive Plan Update
9.A.a
Packet Pg. 236
items ana liates are sui
9.A.a
o change
Pending 1.
Implementation / code updates concerning trees and the UFMP
For Future 2
Climate Action Plan update and public outreach
Consideration
2022 3.
Housing policies and implementation (incl Multifamily Design)
4.
Comprehensive Plan update preparation and gap analysis
5.
Subdivision code updates
6.
Community Development Code Amendments / Re -Organization
7.
Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation (esp. 5 Corners)
8.
Low impact / stormwater code review and updates
9.
Sustainable development code(s) review and updates
10.
Further Highway 99 Implementation, including:
a. Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented
design/development strategies
b. Parking standards
11.
ADA Transition Plan (Parks)
12.
CIP/CFP
Recurring 1. Election of Officers (Vt meeting in December)
Topics 2. Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department Reports & Updates- First
meeting after previous quarter (4/13, 7/13, 10/12, 1/11/23)
3. Joint meeting with City Council — April or as needed
4. Development Activity Report
r
Q
Packet Pg. 237