The URL can be used to link to this page

2017-07-18 City Council - Full Agenda-19331. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 �1 o� NJI Agenda Edmonds City Council "" Ixyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 JULY 18, 2017, 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation in honor of the 95th Anniversary of the Floretum Club (5 min.) 2. Cemetery Board's "Walk Back in Time" at the Edmonds Cemetery (5 min.) 3. Students Saving Salmon 2017 Report (10 min.) AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2017 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2017 3. Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Thomas J. Goebel ($292.28), and Loewyn Young ($86.99). 4. May Monthly Financial Report 5. Authorize the Mayor to sign utility easements and temporary construction easements at 7521 212th St. SW and 7525 212th St. SW for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements project 6. Custodial Services Interlocal Agreement with Town of Woodway 7. Proposed Noise Ordinance PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing on the 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (30 minutes) 2. Presentation of the City of Edmonds' Water Use Efficiency Program for 2017 (10 min.) 8. ACTION ITEMS 1. Second Quarter 2017 Budget Amendment (15 min.) 2. General Commercial (CG) Development Regulations and Planned Action for the Highway 99 Subarea (40 min.) 3. Resolution of Intent to Designate Highway 99 Subarea as a Residential Targeted Area (10 min) 4. Historic Informational Panels for Yost Park and Waterfront Mills (15 min) 5. Tree Board Appointments (15 min.) 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council Committee Reports (10 min.) Edmonds City Council Agenda July 18, 2017 Page 1 10. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS 13. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1). 14. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda July 18, 2017 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Proclamation in honor of the 95th Anniversary of the Floretum Club (5 min.) Staff Lead: Mayor Earling Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Founded in 1922, the Floretum Garden Club is the oldest garden club in the State of Washington celebrating their 95th year in 2017. Staff Recommendation Narrative In honor of the 95th anniversary of the Floretum Garden Club, Mayor Earling will present a proclamation to Floretum Garden Club Past President Sally Wassal & current President Tia Scarce. Attachments: Floretum_95th_Anniversary Packet Pg. 3 O AV lJr1oIrfamatian City of Edmonds • Office of the Mayor Edmonds Floretum Garden Club Week July 16-22, 2017 WHEREAS, the Edmonds Floretum Garden Club is a group of community -based citizens who promote, encourage, and enhance the civic beautification work of our City; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Floretum Garden Club is a vital group that volunteer countless hours of service to helping the City by working tirelessly to enhance the community's enjoyment of our many projects such as the Flower Baskets, Corner Beds and Library plants; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Floretum Garden Club holds an annual plant sale and has raised money to support the Hazel Miller Plaza, local scholarships, and other local floral and landscaping needs; and WHEREAS, these dedicated citizens are celebrating their 95th year as a Civic Club in July 2017 and therefore donated a water fountain feature for the Edmonds Veterans' Plaza (dedication May 2017); NOW THEREFORE, I, David 0. Earling, Mayor, do hereby proclaim July 16, 2017, through July 22, 2017 as Edmonds Floretum Garden Club Week in Edmonds and urge all citizens to recognize and applaud their invaluable service. David 6. Earling, Mayor July 18, 2017 Packet Pg. 4 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Cemetery Board's "Walk Back in Time" at the Edmonds Cemetery (5 min.) Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History The 27th annual Walk Back in Time guided tour, presented by the Edmonds Cemetery Board, will be held on Thursday, July 20, at 1 pm, at the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery & Columbarium. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Whitney Massae, Cemetery Board member, will make a presentation on this annual program. Packet Pg. 5 4.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Students Saving Salmon 2017 Report (10 min.) Staff Lead: Diane Buckshnis, Andrew Pierce Department: City Council Preparer: Andrew Pierce Background/History Council approved $5,000 in the 2016 budget for this project; Council approved $2,500 in the 2017 budget and $5,800 from Council Contingency Funds to purchase a new meter. Staff Recommendation None Narrative This is the second year Students Saving Salmon is presenting to Council regarding their participation in the Edmonds Stream Team in order to provide complete information regarding stream quality in Edmonds. Students in the club learn more about the watersheds in Edmonds with the goal of reestablishing historic salmon runs in Edmonds and making our local environment better for people and salmon. Students have been participating in the City Government process and community enhancement efforts through creating informational materials, writing news articles, participating in town hall and City Council meetings, and being part of the Edmonds Water Quality Monitoring Program, known as the "Edmonds Streams Team". The Edmonds Steam Team is a scientific program set up to collect scientific information on water quality in Edmonds streams and the Edmonds Marsh. There are several creeks in Edmonds that have salmon but there is no data on how stormwater and other runoff may affect the ability of these streams to support salmon. Currently water samples are being collected in several streams (Willow Creek, Shell Creek, Shellabarger Creek and the Edmonds Marsh). The samples are collected quarterly for analysis by an accredited water analysis laboratory that test for metals, petroleum products and other pollutants. This data will be analyzed and presented to the Edmonds City Council and the citizens of Edmonds. In addition to Stream Team Testing, the Students this year received a grant for trees and shrubs and did a large planting at home and business along Shell Creek. First members of the Students Saving Salmon went door to door to 28 homes and handed out information sheets to homeowners to identify what kind of salmon were in the stream and what they could do to protect the habitat. The names of thirteen people interested in the project were given to Sound Salmon Solutions <http://www.soundsalmonsolutions.org/>, which gave them a grant for obtaining native trees and Packet Pg. 6 4.3 plants. Trees were planted in April along Shell Creek. The homeowner whose property surrounds the wall is willing to work with the students on making improvements to ease salmon passage. On May 31, 2017, EWHS Students Saving Salmon club released seven -hundred juvenile Coho salmon from the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery into lower, middle and upper Shell Creek. These salmon will live in the creek for about a year and then go out to sea where they will live for two years before coming back to Shell Creek to spawn as adults. Data collected by Students Saving Salmon on the good quality of Shell Creek habitat was used to request WDFW allow the hatchery Coho to be released in Shell Creek. This is part of the student's Shell Creek Salmon Stewardship project to improve the numbers of salmon that utilize Shell Creek. This is likely the first time Coho salmon have been in upper Shell Creek in over fifty to one -hundred years due to passage barriers in the creek. Additionally this year, the Mayor's Climate Protection Committee selected the Students Saving Salmon as a Sustainability Hero (award) from the City of Edmonds, Climate Protection Committee for the work you have been doing for Habitat Restoration. A certificate honoring the students will be presented tonight at the conclusion of their presentation. Here are links to their media captured events. Facebook site - Students Saving Salmon -Edmonds Stream Team https://www.facebook.com/Students-Saving-Salmon-Edmonds-Stream-Team-1094875650565724/ "Planting for Salmon" photos on Edmonds Stream Team Google Drive https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/OBxCsRIu-tWW5RVRtZW1hb2VrYXM?usp=sharing Shell Creek Salmon Survey photos on Edmonds Stream Team Google Drive https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/OBypyPKhYpCkXa DZ5VmdHQm9yMjg?usp=sharing Stream Team Monitoring - all sites on Edmonds Stream Team Google Drive https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/OBypyPKhYpCkXMn RUTGNYVFZvbUO?usp=sharing Attachments: 2017 STREAM TEAM REPORT Packet Pg. 7 4.3.a CONDITION OF EDMONDS STREAMS FOR SALMON: WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND SALMON STEWARDSHIP EDMONDS -WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SAVING SALMON July 2017 EDMONDS STREAM TEAM Joe Scordino, Project Leader Malia Clark, Farah Al-Qurishi - Shell Creek Team Taylor Blevins, Erin Francisco, Emily Hoang - Shellabarger Creek Team Joe Cooper, Jared Yu, Sabrina Liu, Angela Yang, Olivia Park - Willow Creek Team Emily McLaughlin Sta. Maria, Ava Wilson - Marsh Team David Millette and James Ogren - EWHS Science Teachers Peggy Foreman and Valerie Stewart - Volunteer Advisors Packet Pg. 8 4.3.a TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................I INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................... 3 STUDYAREA.............................................................................................................................................................4 METHODS...................................................................................................................................................................5 0 Q. RESULTS.....................................................................................................................................................................8 ti SHELL CREEK SALMON STEWARDSHIP........................................................................................................13 N c RECOMMENDATIONS / CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................................13 0 E ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.........................................................................................................................................14 m a� c REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................................................15 R U) Cn w c a� 3 O M N N Packet Pg. 9 4.3.a Students Saving Salmon participated in the Edmonds Stream Team which was formed to fill gaps in information on the quality of Edmonds streams and conditions for salmon. Edmonds-Woodway High School students in the Students Saving Salmon club volunteered to participate in the Edmonds Stream Team citizen science project to collect monthly water quality measurements from several streams that flow through or near the downtown area of Edmonds and the Edmonds Marsh. From August 2015 to June 2017, the Edmonds Stream Team monitored upstream and downstream sites in Willow Creek, Shell Creek, Shellabarger Creek, and the Edmonds Marsh for water quality parameters that are important for aquatic organism survival. Water samples were also collected seasonally for lab analysis for dissolved metals, petroleum -derived compounds, and fecal coliform bacteria. A multiparameter instrument was used to collect standard water parameters such as water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and conductivity. Water parameters were evaluated against the Washington State Water Quality Criteria for freshwater aquatic life (see Washington Administrative Code 173-201A-030). Water temperature in the three Creeks exhibited the expected trend of decreasing temperatures in the fall (average of 52.8'F) to winter lows averaging 47.3'F and then increasing to an average of 54.5'F in the spring and 57.8 °F in the summer. The highest summer average temperature was 60.1 °F in lower Hindley Creek. These temperatures are below the maximum temperature requirement of 63.5 °F for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration in the Washington Administrative Code. Dissolved oxygen in the three Creeks was generally higher in the winter with colder water temperatures and lower in the summer. Average dissolved oxygen levels in the three creeks ranged from a low of 10.0 mg/L in summer to a high of 11.3 mg/L in the winter. The lowest average was 9.3 mg/L in the south fork of upper Shellabarger in the summer. These are well above the 8.0 mg/L for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration in the Washington Administrative Code. Further, the measured dissolved oxygen levels in lower Shell Creek, where salmon spawn, averaged above 11.0 mg/L in the fall and winter which is an optimum level for salmon eggs in the gravel. Water temperature in the Edmonds Marsh exhibited the expected trend of decreasing temperatures in the fall/winter and increased temperatures in the spring/summer. Average water temperatures at all sites in the Marsh ranged from 45.5'F in the winter to 62.2'F in the summer; all of which are below the maximum temperature requirement of 63.5'F for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration in the Washington Administrative Code. However, the water exiting the Marsh exceeded the standard in the spring and summer of 2016 with a high of 73.2 in June 2016. The north edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square also exceeded the standard in all summer months. Increased vegetation in/around the Marsh may be beneficial. The main water body flowing through the Edmonds Marsh (from Shellabarger inlet at the Hwy 104 culverts to the Marsh outlet) had dissolved oxygen averaging a low of 8.1 mg/L in the summer to a high of 10.6 in the winter. However, dissolved oxygen measured on the northern edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square averaged below 3.8 mg/L with a low of 0.3 in the spring. These low levels are lethal to salmon and other aquatic organisms. Improved water circulation in the Marsh may be beneficial to address this problem. Packet Pg. 10 4.3.a Salinity measurements in the Marsh from December to early March reflected the low salinity of the incoming freshwater from the Shellabarger inlet and lower Willow Creek. But, when the tide gate is secured open by the City from mid -March to mid -October, the salinity measurements were significantly greater in the Marsh. The ecological functions and environmental benefits of this estuarine wetland would be enhanced by keeping the tidegate secured open year-round to allow tidal flow. Counts of fecal coliform bacteria colonies cultured from water samples collected varied considerably by location/season/day. There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for fecal coliform for freshwater aquatic life. However, if we use the Washington criteria for water contact recreation (i.e., levels must not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 mL) as an indicator of a potential bacteria problem, then there are a number of samples that are of concern. Fecal coliform counts appear to be higher after a period of rain and we will be analyzing this further. Pollutant sampling revealed an area of concern. Twenty-two water samples collected over seven seasons were analyzed by the ALS Laboratory in Everett for 18 different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that are identified as priority pollutants for analysis by the EPA. Only 10 of these PAHs had WA water quality standard (human health criteria) designated, and five PAHs were found in water samples at levels that exceeded those standards. Sixteen of the 22 samples had at least one of these five carcinogenic PAHs (cPAHs) that exceeded the standard. Benzo(a)pyrene occurred above standard in all of these 16 samples. All water samples (total of 4) collected from the north edge of Marsh (along Harbor Square) had cPAHs that exceeded standards, whereas only 2 of the 4 samples collected at same time from the east edge of Marsh at the storm drain had cPAHs that exceeded standards. Contingent upon continued support from the City and grants, the Edmonds Stream Team plans to continue the citizen science project into 2018 with new high school students that will replace the graduating seniors. Plans are to continue monthly monitoring utilizing Students Saving Salmon club members and the quarterly collection of water samples for Lab analysis. Students Saving Salmon plans to continue the Shell Creek Salmon Stewardship project because the outreach to streamside residents and restoration efforts should benefit existing and future salmon that utilize Shell Creek. We plan to continue placing juvenile coho salmon (from the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery in Edmonds) in the upper areas of Shell Creek (above an impassable barrier — a 5-foot waterfall) to bolster the lower Shell Creek salmon population. We also plan to continue pursuing avenues (such as grants) to determine the feasibility and cost of undertaking a restoration project that removes the impassable barrier (a 5-foot waterfall) and allows salmon passage to the upper reaches of Shell Creek. Packet Pg. 11 4.3.a IQ1Y:Z11Bill" Y1130 Students Saving Salmon is an Edmonds-Woodway High School club formed by students that are concerned about their environment, especially salmon and their habitat. To achieve their goal of fostering and reestablishing salmon runs in Edmonds, students in the club are learning about Edmonds watersheds and conservation/restoration efforts so they can encourage measures that will make the local environment better for people and salmon. Students Saving Salmon objectives are to collect and disseminate scientific information on salmon habitat and Edmonds watersheds; conduct outreach on salmon habitat and water quality; and, participate in city government processes and community habitat enhancement efforts. The City of Edmonds has several creeks draining into Puget Sound that may support salmon, but unfortunately there is little baseline data on water quality in these streams nor information on whether stormwater and other runoff may be affecting the ability of these streams to support salmon. There was one instance of a die -off of juvenile coho salmon in May of 2004 at the Willow Creek Hatchery that was attributed to potential stormwater pollutants in Willow Creek after a rainstorm, but no water quality data was available to evaluate it (Seattle Times, May 26, 2004). To address the lack of water quality data, Students Saving Salmon is participating in the Edmonds Stream Team, a citizen science project designed to collect high quality data on the condition of Edmonds creeks and the Edmonds Marsh utilizing volunteer high school students. Stream monitoring programs are essential for assessing current conditions and tracking changes in water quality over time to identify potential problems and/or determine if community actions have been successful. Good water quality is essential to maintaining the presence of salmon in streams. When a stream falls outside healthy levels, it can have detrimental effects on aquatic organisms. The influx of stormwater is one factor that can quickly change water quality to the detriment of salmonids. Unfortunately, city and state staff and funding resources are limited, and stream monitoring in urban areas such as Edmonds cannot be implemented without volunteer support. Thus, the Edmonds Stream Team citizen science project was designed to provide important baseline information to city and state government agencies to assist in environmental assessments and decision -making. The Edmonds Stream team not only collected data on basic water parameters, but also conducted bacterial monitoring for fecal coliform, biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates, and sampling water for dissolved metals and petroleum -derived compounds. This citizen science project also provides a great opportunity for high school students to be actively involved in field science to gain a greater understanding of environmental issues. This report presents results of the Edmonds Stream Team monitoring since 2015 of three creeks in Edmonds (Shell Creek, Willow Creek and Shellabarger Creek) and the Edmonds Marsh. A preliminary report (Scordino et. al 2016) on this project was provided to the Edmonds City Council in June 2016. This report also presents more recent efforts by Students Saving Salmon to better understand the dynamics of the salmon occurring in Shell Creek and implement a Shell Creek Salmon Stewardship project. Packet Pg. 12 4.3.a Edmonds Watersheds and Creeks Watersheds in the City of Edmonds are made up of small creeks or underground pipes that drain directly to Puget Sound or to the east into Lake Ballinger (which flows to Lake Washington and then to Puget Sound). The creeks originate from natural springs with input from rainfall and underground pipes that collect flows from storm drains located along paved streets and parking lots. In some Edmonds watersheds, water flows in underground pipes most of the way to Puget Sound. Edmonds also has several wetlands that provide wildlife habitat including the Edmonds Marsh, Good Hope Pond, Shell Creek Marsh, and wetlands adjacent to the creeks. All Edmonds creeks are designated as Type F (streams that contain fish habitat) in the Edmonds City Development Code (EDCD 23.90.010). None of the Edmonds creeks are designated as "shorelines of the state" because they do not meet the 20 cubic -foot -per -second annual flow threshold for classification as a water of the state (Sea Run Consultants et al. 2007). EDCD 23.90.010 lists Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek, Hindley Creek, Perrinville Creek, and Lunds Gulch Creek as having anadromous fish species (fish born in freshwater that migrate to the ocean to grow into adults, and then return to spawn in freshwater streams). The Edmonds Marsh is currently the focus of a major City of Edmonds restoration project, called the "Willow Creek Daylighting" project (Shannon and Wilson, Inc. 2013). Thus, the Edmonds Stream Team citizen science project was designed to focus on the Edmonds Marsh and the two creeks (Willow and Shellabarger) that flow into the Marsh so that pre -restoration baseline data are collected. By including Shell Creek, which currently has spawning salmon return each year, the project covers water quality for the downtown area of Edmonds. Edmonds Marsh The Edmonds Marsh, located on the west side of Highway 104 south of downtown Edmonds, receives drainage from Shellabarger Creek Basin (378 acres), the Willow Creek Basin (393 acres), and another 61 acres from local areas (i.e., Harbor Square, adjacent Highway 104 storm drains, and the old UnoCal fuel tank farm site) that drain into the Marsh (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). The Edmonds Marsh drains to Puget Sound through a channelized portion of Willow Creek at the southwest end of the Marsh. The channel passes through two large culverts under the railroad tracks into an open basin and then into an approximately 1,660-foot 48-inch pipe that passes through a tide gate before draining into the lower intertidal area of Marina Beach. The tide gate functions to prevent tidal saltwater intrusion into the Marsh from mid -October through mid -March to avoid flooding potential when high tides coincide with heavy rainfall. During the spring and summer months the tide gate is secured open so that the Marsh is tidally influenced. The 23-acre Edmonds Marsh is a City of Edmonds Park managed by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. Willow Creek Willow Creek flows through a largely residential area draining a 393-acre basin area of which 183 acres are in Edmonds and the remaining acreage in Woodway (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). Willow Creek starts in Edmonds and flows through Woodway before draining 4 Packet Pg. 13 4.3.a into the Edmonds Marsh on the west side of SR 104 just north of Pine Street (adjacent to the Willow Creek Hatchery). Coho salmon, cutthroat trout, and, historically, chum salmon occur in Willow Creek (CH2M HILL 2004). Juvenile salmon were observed in Willow Creek in 2016, and they were likely releases from the Willow Creek Hatchery. The 1,660-foot entrance pipe to Willow Creek/Marsh from Puget Sound (in subtidal area) likely precludes most adult salmon passage into the Marsh and creeks. Shellabarger Creek Shellabarger Creek drains a 378-acre basin area (called the "Edmonds Bowl") and flows into the Shellabarger Marsh (a name we have coined for the marsh located within several private properties on the east side of Highway 104) which then drains into the Edmonds Marsh through two large culverts under Highway 104. The Shellabarger Creek corridor is heavily developed. The stream passes through culverts in many locations and most of the open reaches are located in landscaped residential areas (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). Information on fish use of Shellabarger Creek is limited; WDFW has not conducted fish surveys in the creek. Resident cutthroat are likely present, and the creek is accessible to anadromous fish that use Edmonds Marsh (Sea -Run Consulting et al. 2007). Similar to Willow Creek though, the 1,660-foot pipe outlet to Puget Sound likely precludes most adult salmon from entering the Marsh and thus upstream to Shellabarger Creek. However, there was a possible adult salmon occurrence in the upper middle fork of Shellabarger Creek in the fall of 2014 based on the description of a fish observed upstream of 7t' Avenue; it was either a coho salmon or a large cutthroat trout (My Edmonds News article; February 14, 2015). Shell Creek The Shell Creek basin comprises a drainage area of 821 acres, which includes the 178-acre Hindley Creek subbasin (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). Hindley Creek empties into Shell Creek west of Brookmere Drive just north of Caspers Street. Both Shell Creek and Hindley Creek have diversion structures that convey high flows directly to Puget Sound via a pipe system. The Shell Creek diversion structure and a fish ladder are located on Daley Street east of 7th Avenue. The Hindley Creek bypass begins at 9th Avenue N and Hindley Lane, where it enters the same pipe used for the Shell Creek bypass. Shell Creek flows through several undeveloped areas including Yost Park at the upper end of the creek and an open area on private property at the terminal end of the creek just east of the railroad tracks. The Shell Creek Marsh is located just north of Shell Creek at its terminal area east of the tracks. Adult chum and coho salmon are observed in lower Shell Creek each year. Lower Shell Creek residents (north of Glen Ave.) have reported seeing adult salmon in Shell Creek each year from late October to early December and they were confirmed to be chum and coho salmon by the Edmonds Stream Team. Salmon passage north of Glen Ave. Is blocked by a 5-foot manmade/natural waterfall. METHODS Monitoring sites were selected to provide representative locations for upper and lower reaches of Shellabarger, Willow and Shell Creeks and various locations including incoming/outgoing flow sites in Packet Pg. 14 4.3.a the Edmonds Marsh. Selection criteria included easy and safe access to creek sites and property owner permission. Shellabarger Creek has three geographically separated forks in the upper creek area and the upper end of each fork was monitored. Shellabarger Creek monitoring included the Shellabarger Marsh where it flows under Highway 104 into the Edmonds Marsh. The Marsh was a challenge to establish sites since only the edges of the Marsh were easily accessible and the western and southern edges were not accessible (Burlington Northern Railroad property and old UnoCal site). Chevron denied access to the old Unocal site. Fortunately, the City allowed access to the fenced Marsh outlet basin (west of railroad tracks) in the Marina parking lot which was an ideal location to sample outgoing water from the main body of the Marsh. Students Saving Salmon members joined one of four teams with each team responsible for monitoring four to five sites on one day each month. This ensured that the upper and lower portion of each creek and the incoming/outgoing sites at the Marsh were monitored on the same day. A rugged, high quality handheld multiparameter instrument, a YSI Professional Plus (YSI ProPlus), was used by students to collect water quality data. The YSI ProPlus is equipped with a 4-meter (12 foot) cable (to allow monitoring off low bridges) with an attached probe that holds four user replaceable sensors for temperature/conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH and nitrate measurements. The instrument was calibrated by the project leader each month just prior to that month's monitoring. A YSI ProDSS meter, that holds four user replaceable sensors for temperature/conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH/oxygen reduction potential and turbidity, was purchased in December 2016 as a backup to the YSI ProPlus and used periodically in 2017. Water quality parameters There are many parameters that can be monitored to assess a stream's condition or trends in water quality. The Edmonds Stream Team chose to emulate the Washington State Department of Ecology's ambient water quality monitoring program (Von Prause 2014) which collects monthly data in rivers and streams throughout Washington. We were however limited on available equipment and laboratory access to collect all of the State's standard parameters. Our monthly collection included dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, conductivity, salinity, total dissolved solids, nitrates and turbidity (periodically). We did not have the capacity to collect ammonia, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, fecal coliform and total suspended solids data as the State does at all stations each month though we collected samples for fecal coliform analysis quarterly. Water temperature is the most critical factor influencing biological and chemical conditions in water. The solubility of oxygen, other gases and some compounds change with water temperature thus changing their effects on aquatic organisms. Water temperature was recorded to the nearest tenth degree (0.1) Fahrenheit (°F) and also reported (converted) in Celsius (°C) in the database. Measured temperatures were evaluated against Washington's Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-210) which sets aquatic life standards (7-day average of daily maximum temperatures) at 63.5 °F (17.5 °C) for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration. Dissolved oxygen (DO) is a very important parameter in assessing water quality because of its influence on the organisms living within a body of water. Aquatic organisms use dissolved oxygen in respiration, similar to organisms using air on land. Dissolved oxygen levels were recorded to the nearest tenth (0.1) mg/L of oxygen at each monitored site. Measured dissolved oxygen levels (mg/L) were evaluated against 6 Packet Pg. 15 4.3.a Washington's Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-210) which sets a minimum of 8.0 mg/L for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration; and, 6.5 mg/L for salmon rearing and migration only. The pH of a stream determines the solubility of nutrients and chemicals in the water thus affecting the aquatic organism in the water. pH is the measure of the hydrogen ion concentration in water with 7.0 being neutral, above 7.0 basic or alkaline, and below 7.0 acidic. pH was reported to the nearest hundredth (0.01) on pH scale of 0 to 14. Measured pH values were evaluated against Washington's Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-210) which sets all aquatic life pH criteria to be within a range of 6.5 to 8.5. Conductivity is a measure of water's ability to pass an electrical current which is directly related to the concentration of ions in the water from dissolved salts and inorganic materials. Conductivity was recorded to the nearest tenth micro Siemens per centimeter (µS/cm) and also recorded as specific conductance which is the conductivity measurement corrected to 25 °C (77°F) thus allowing direct comparisons of different sites/dates. The conductivity sensor on the ProPlus and ProDSS meters also reports total dissolved solids (TDS) in grams per liter (g/L) and salinity in parts per thousand (ppt). There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for these parameters. Nutrients are elements required for the growth of organisms. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon are the three most important nutrients for aquatic plants. Although nitrogen compounds are essential for plant and animal life, high levels of nutrients in a body of water may cause plant life and algae to flourish causing blooms that can choke out other organisms. To monitor nutrients, a nitrate sensor on the YSI ProPlus instrument was used. Nitrate concentration expressed as nitrate -nitrogen (NO3-N) was recorded in mg/L. There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for nitrates though levels below 5.0 mg/L are considered good. Lab analysis for dissolved metals and petroleum compounds Water samples were collected and delivered to an accredited water analysis laboratory for petroleum - derived compounds and dissolved metals testing four times per year (once each season - winter, spring, summer, fall) and during storm events if possible. Stormwater samples were to be `first flush' samples collected during a rainstorm with a forecast of 0.25 inches or greater after three days of no rain. The number of sites, frequency of collection and number of pollutants analyzed was restricted due to costs of laboratory analysis and availability of grant funds to conduct the laboratory analyses. Samples were collected in sterile bottles provided by the Lab. One sample was collected during a rainstorm and others were collected on a seasonal basis (fall, winter, spring, summer). Thirty-nine water samples from 12 sites were collected in sterile bottles provided by the Lab. All were delivered to the ALS Environmental Laboratory in Everett for analysis. The samples were analyzed for heavy metals (arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), cooper (Cu), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and zinc (Zn)), BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes), TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbons), and PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). Due to the costs of some of the Lab tests, not all samples were analyzed for all of the metals/compounds; only 22 samples were analyzed for PAH because of the high cost. Funding for the Lab analyses was provided through grants issued to EarthCorps and Sound Salmon Solutions. Lab results were evaluated against Washington's Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-240) for toxic substances. Packet Pg. 16 4.3.a Lab analysis for fecal coliform bacteria In January 2016, the City of Edmonds agreed to analyze water samples for fecal coliform several times a year at the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant Lab. Since then, water samples have been collected in sterile Whirl -Pack bags from monitoring sites each season (winter, spring, summer, fall). Each water sample was stored on ice during field collection and delivered to the Lab within 2 hours of collection. The Lab processed each sample using the Membrane Filter Procedure (mFC/Rosalic Acid Broth). There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for fecal coliform for freshwater aquatic life. However, there are criteria in the Washington Administrative Code (173-201A-260) for water contact recreation which sets a `primary contact recreation' criteria that fecal coliform organism levels must not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 mL, with not more than 10 percent of all samples (or any single sample when less than ten sample points exist) obtained for calculating the geometric mean value exceeding 200 colonies /100 mL. A `secondary contact recreation' criteria is the same except the 100 colonies value is set at 200 colonies and the not more than ten percent for the 200 colonies value is set at 400 colonies. Collecting and identifying macroinvertebrates Sound Salmon Solutions conducted macroinvertebrate identification training with EWHS IB Science classes in 2016 and Honors Biology classes in 2017. Macroinvertebrate water samples were collected by students using dip nets in Shell Creek. Macroinvertebrates identified were classified into three groups based on their pollution tolerance. Group 1 macroinvertebrates, consisting of caddisfly larvae, mayfly nymph, stonefly larvae are intolerant of pollution; Group 2 macroinvertebrates, consisting of scud, crane fly larvae, are partially tolerant of pollution; and, Group 3 macroinvertebrates, consisting of aquatic worm, blackfly larvae, midge larvae are tolerant of pollution. RESULTS From August 2015 to June 2017, water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH trends observed were as expected with water temperatures changing with season and dissolved oxygen levels fluctuating with water temperature (i.e., higher dissolved oxygen levels with colder waters). For the purposes of this report (since monitoring occurred in early part of each month), winter is defined as early January to early March; spring is early April to early June, summer is early July to early September, and fall is early October to early December. Water Temperature in Creeks Average water temperatures in the three creeks ranged from 52.8 °F in the fall to 47.3 °F in the winter to 54.5 °F in the spring and 57.8 °F in the summer (Table 1). The highest summer average temperature was 60.1 °F in lower Hindley Creek. All of the recorded monthly water temperatures were below the maximum temperature requirement of 63.5 °F for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration in the Washington Administrative Code. Packet Pg. 17 Table 1. Seasonal Water Temperatures in Creeks (in degrees Fahrenheit) Fall spring summer winter average Lower Hindley Creek 53.1 56.4 60.1 46.4 53.1 Lower Shell Creek 51.8 53.3 57.1 46.9 51.9 Middle Shell Creek 51.4 52.5 54.7 46.9 51.2 Upper Shell Creek 50.9 52.1 53.1 47.2 50.7 Lower Shellabarger Creek 54.1 55.5 59.9 47.5 53.8 Shellabarger Creek - Upper middle fork 52.8 55.9 58.7 48.4 53.3 Shellabarger Creek - Upper north fork 53.1 56.7 -- 47.9 51.9 Shellabarger Creek - Upper south fork 53.2 54.7 58.5 47.2 53.2 Lower Willow Creek 52.6 53.5 57.7 45.9 52.2 Upper Willow Creek 53.8 53.7 56.6 50.4 53.3 Water Temperature in Edmonds Marsh Average water temperatures at all sites in the Marsh ranged from 53.9 °F in the fall to 45.5 °F in the winter to 5 7. 1 °F in the spring and 62.2°F in the summer (Table 2); all of which are below the maximum temperature requirement of 63.5 °F for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration in the Washington Administrative Code. However, the water exiting the Marsh exceeded the standard in the spring and summer of 2016 with a high of 73.2 in June 2016. The north edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square exceeded the standard in all summer months. Table 2. Seasonal Water Temperatures in Edmonds Marsh (in degrees Fahrenheit) Fall spring summer winter average East edge at storm drain 53.2 54.3 60.8 43.1 53.1 Eastern edge 52.8 54.8 60.2 46.3 52.6 Eastern edge at Hwy 104 Culvert 53.7 55.7 59.5 47.2 53.9 Harbor Square east culvert 55.6 57.6 65.4 45.9 56.1 Harbor Square west culvert 55.4 58.3 64.6 46.1 56.0 Marsh outlet 52.6 61.4 62.7 44.0 54.1 Dissolved Oxygen in Creeks Average dissolved oxygen levels in the three creeks ranged from a low of 10.0 mg/L in summer to a high of 11.3 mg/L in the winter (Table 2). The lowest average was 9.3 mg/L in the south fork of upper Shellabarger in the summer. These are well above the 8.0 mg/L for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration in the Washington Administrative Code. Further, the measured dissolved oxygen levels in lower Shell Creek, where salmon spawn in fall and winter, were above 11.0 mg/L which is an optimum level for salmon eggs in the gravel. Packet Pg. 18 4.3.a Table 3. Seasonal Dissolved Oxygen in Creeks (in mg/L) fall spring summer winter average Lower Hindley Creek Lower Shell Creek 10.1 10.2 9.8 11.5 10.5 11.0 10.8 10.5 11.7 11.0 Middle Shell Creek 11.3 11.1 11.1 12.0 11.4 Upper Shell Creek 9.9 10.0 9.8 10.5 10.1 Lower Shellabarger Creek 10.1 9.9 9.5 11.2 10.3 Shellabarger Creek - Upper middle fork 10.9 10.3 10.5 11.5 10.8 Shellabarger Creek - Upper north fork 10.4 9.9 -- 10.8 10.4 Shellabarger Creek - Upper south fork 10.1 9.9 9.3 11.2 10.1 Lower Willow Creek 10.7 10.3 10.4 11.6 10.8 pper Willow Creek 10.2 10.4 10.4 10.7 10.4 Dissolved Oxygen in Edmonds Marsh Dissolved Oxygen - The main flow of water through the Edmonds Marsh (from Shellabarger inlet at the Hwy 104 culverts to the Marsh outlet) had dissolved oxygen averaging over 9.2 mg/L which exceeds the 8.0 mg/L minimum for salmonids in the Washington Administrative Code. However, dissolved oxygen measured on the northern edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square and portions of the eastern edge of the Marsh along Highway 104 were below standards. The northern edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square averaged 2.3 mg/L of dissolved oxygen and was below 2.0 mg/L (which is lethal to most aquatic organisms) except during periods of rainfall. The eastern edge of the Marsh, south of the Shellabarger inlet culverts, averaged 1.5 mg/L of dissolved oxygen. Table 4. Seasonal Dissolved Oxygen in Edmonds Marsh (in mg/L) Fall spring summer winter average East edge at storm drain 1.0 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 Eastern edge 5.9 6.1 5.4 8.9 6.8 Eastern edge at Hwy 104 Culvert 9.0 8.9 8.2 10.6 9.2 Harbor Square east culvert 1.9 0.3 1.1 2.3 1.4 Harbor Square west culvert 2.7 0.8 2.2 3.4 2.3 Marsh outlet 8.7 10.2 8.1 10.5 9.5 pH All of the observed pH levels in the Creeks were within the pH 6.5 to 8.5 range that is suitable for salmon and within the Washington Water Quality Standards for aquatic life. pH levels ranged from 6.54 to 8.26 with an overall average of 7.7. The Edmonds Marsh had an average pH of 7.0 for all sites with the incoming/outgoing water averaging 7.3 and the north edges along Harbor Square more acidic with pH averaging 6.5. Measured pH was below the Water Quality pH standard of 6.5 on several occasions on the northern edge of the Marsh site along Harbor Square. 10 Packet Pg. 19 4.3.a Conductivity Conductivity measurements in all three creeks stayed relatively constant except during periods of rainfall which lowers the conductivity of water since rainwater is generally low in ions (thus low in conductivity). The conductivity measurements in the Marsh were affected by the opening of the tidegate with high conductivity levels recorded during saltwater intrusion. High conductivity readings in the Marsh are not unexpected since saltwater has much more dissolved ions and solids than freshwater. Nitrates Nitrate levels in all three creeks averaged 1.6 mg/L which is considered good. High nitrate levels can cause algal blooms which can deplete dissolved oxygen levels in water thus impacting fish and other aquatic organisms. Salinity in Edmonds Marsh The salinity of the water in the Marsh is affected by a tidegate located downstream of the Marsh outlet. The tidegate functions to prevent saltwater intrusion into the Marsh from mid -October to mid -March (to prevent flooding during periods of coinciding high rainfall and high tides). In mid -March, the tidegate is secured in an open position to allow full tidal exchange of saltwater through the spring/summer months. The salinity measurements at the Marsh outlet (which is representative of the main body of the Marsh) from December to early March (averaging 0.15 ppt) reflect the low salinity of the incoming freshwater from the Shellabarger inlet and lower Willow Creek. When the tide gate is secured open, the salinity measurements were significantly greater in the Marsh with an average of 6.36 ppt salinity. The Marsh outlet salinity measurements during months when the tide gate is secured open are affected by when in the tidal cycle the measurements are taken. The spring/summer monitoring protocol for the Marsh outlet calls for monitoring during low tide to avoid sampling incoming saltwater from Puget Sound, and thus results in variably lower salinity readings (due to mixing with freshwater) than would be observed during incoming tidal saltwater (since saltwater has a salinity of about 35 ppt). Fecal Coliform Bacteria Counts of fecal coliform bacteria colonies cultured from water samples collected varied considerably by location/season/day. There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for fecal coliform for freshwater aquatic life. However, if we use the Washington criteria for water contact recreation (i.e., levels must not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 mL) as an indicator of a potential bacteria problem, then there are a number of samples that are of concern. Fecal coliform counts appear to be higher after a period of rain and we will be analyzing this further Pollutants Water samples were collected over seven seasons for analysis by the ALS Laboratory in Everett for heavy metals and petroleum derived compounds. Due to the high cost of pollutant analyses, not all sites could be samples nor were all tests run on each sample collected. 11 Packet Pg. 20 Twenty-two water samples were analyzed for 18 different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that are identified as priority pollutants for analysis by the EPA. Only 10 of these PAHs had WA water quality standard (human health criteria) designated, and five PAHs were found in water samples at levels that exceeded those standards. The five carcinogenic PAHs (cPAHs) that exceeded standards in the samples were Benzo(a)Anthracene, Benzo(a)Pyrene, Benzo(b) Fluoranthene, Benzo(k) Fluoranthene, and Indeno(1,2,3-cd) Pyrene. Sixteen of the 22 samples had at least one of these five carcinogenic PAHs that exceeded the standard. Figure 1 shows the percentage over the standard for each of the CPAHs at each site sampled. Benzo(a)Pyrene occurred above standard in all of the 16 samples. All water samples (total of 4) collected from the north edge of Marsh (along Harbor Square) had cPAHs that exceeded standards, whereas only 2 of the 4 samples collected at same time from the east edge of Marsh at a storm drain had cPAHs that exceeded standards (i.e., Harbor Square edge is more polluted than the Marsh edges near Hwy 104). Figure 1. cPAHs - Percentage over standard/criteria 250 200 150 ! 100 50s 0 Y a7 4� Y 4� � 3 � 0 0 °' 0 0 3 H Y 3 H $' o � `o �' o C C ! s ! s Mr Y E Y 40 E 4Y a7 a7 a7 -Z.,1= pp Y a o °7 0 °7 °7 0 ° ° 0 W 0 N a.+ t fN6 N _" _R — t 3-9 N Y rc `p rc p au o rc `p C7 � C fC6 � C fC6 N 2 0 N Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Spring 2016 Spring 2017 Summer 2016 Winter 201Winter 2017 ■ Benzo[a]anthracene ■ Benzo[a]pyrene ■ Benzo[b]fluoranthene ■ Benzo[k]fluoranthene ■ Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Thirty-nine water samples were analyzed for heavy metals. All samples had low levels of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cooper, and lead. Mercury was not detected at any of the sites. Iron and zinc had higher levels detected than the other metals. Further analysis of the occurrence of heavy metals relative to water quality and aquatic organism tolerance are ongoing. Water samples were also analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and BTEX (Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, and Xylenes). TPH and BTEX were detected in some, but not all samples. These data will be further analyzed after collection of additional samples. Macroinvertebrates Students scanned the water samples collected at upper, middle and lower Shell Creek in 2016 and 2017 and identified the macroinvertebrates in the samples using a dichotomous key. The identified macroinvertebrates were then assigned to their respective pollution tolerance groups. The number of different types of macroinvertebrates in each group were summed and multiplied by a weighting factor (3 12 Packet Pg. 21 4.3.a for Group 1, 2 for Group 2, and 1 for Group 3). The sum of the all the weighted values was then divided by the total number of macroinvertebrate types resulting in an index. The index value was compared to a quality ranking of 2.7+ being excellent; 2.0 to 2.6 being good; 1.6 to 1.9 being fair, and 0 to 1.5 being poor. Resulting student index scores fell in the `good' quality ranking. ki1,1BMN1[y:7B101►t.Y11QUIF11W .IIWAY.11k"I133111W In the fall of 2016, in an effort to enhance the existing salmon populations in lower Shell Creek, students began a stewardship project working with streamside residents. Students conducted a door-to-door survey with residents to obtain local knowledge about the current and past salmon runs; obtain information on stream habitat (since all of the lower stream is on private property in back yards of residential homes) and willingness of residents to improve the habitat with native vegetation; provide handouts and informational material on salmon and their habitat to residents; gauge the willingness of residents to consider restoration projects to benefit salmon; and conduct direct observations of salmon to confirm numbers, species and conditions. Students Saving Salmon worked in teams to visit and survey 28 of the 38 residences along lower Shell Creek (north of 7' and Glen Ave.). Survey data was entered into a database that is the start of an information base on the lower creek. Residents who expressed an interest in habitat restoration and having native shrubs added to their property were subsequently contacted to make arrangements for planting native shrubs that were made available free to residents through a Rose Foundation grant issued to Sound Salmon Solutions. About 320 native shrubs were planted by Students Saving Salmon at four residences along Shell Creek during the student's spring break in April 2017. An additional 80 native plants are planned for a fall planting on Holy Rosary Church property along Shell Creek. In spring of 2017, WDFW gave permission to plant juvenile coho (raised in the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery in Edmonds) into Shell Creek. All of coho raised in the hatchery are otherwise placed in the watersheds that drain into Lake Washington. Over 800 juvenile coho were planted in upper, middle and lower Shell Creek by Students Saving Salmon. Students involved in the survey and plantings felt the project was a great opportunity for students to have an active role in the community in helping salmon. Students Saving Salmon plans to continue the Shell Creek Salmon Stewardship project into the future, including planting juvenile coho in the upper areas of Shell Creek each year. RECOMMENDATIONS / CONCLUSIONS The current water quality monitoring project should continue as is so that annual trends can be evaluated and baseline information established. Having a long-term data series will allow for future comparisons to potential environmental or pollutant driven perturbations and potential effects of climate change. We appreciate the support we've received from the Edmonds City Council and the City of Edmonds, and hope the $2,500 provided each year will continue as those funds are critical for obtaining the supplies necessary to conduct this project. The project has demonstrated that a citizen science project utilizing volunteer high school students can be successful in collecting good quality scientific data and providing students hands-on experience in 13 Packet Pg. 22 4.3.a conducting field science. Students adhered to the field sampling protocols in spite of adverse weather in the winter and ensured quality data was collected throughout the year. From the student's perspective, the project has provided them valuable field science experience that they can/will apply in the future. Water quality monitoring to date indicates the principal water parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH) in the Creeks adhere to the requirements of the Washington Water Quality standards for salmon. We applaud the residents of Edmonds in helping keep our streams in good condition. The Edmonds Marsh did not conform with the standards in all months monitored. The edges of the Marsh had low dissolved oxygen levels in most months and had more acidic water in some months. The Marsh also had higher in some summer months than are suitable for salmon. Better freshwater circulation, increased vegetation (trees and shrubs), and year-round tidal influx of saltwater may help alleviate the Marsh problems. The occurrence of carcinogenic pollutants that exceed state standards and criteria is an area of concern that warrants further investigation by the City and the Port of Edmonds. It will also be important to continue collecting water samples for pollutant analyses - hopefully new grant funds will be available to the project after current funds are expended in November 2017. Continued sampling for fecal coliform analysis needs to continue in order to obtain data to better understand when and why the spikes in bacterial counts occur. Although bacterial DNA testing is expensive, it may be beneficial to determine the source of the fecal coliform bacteria in the higher count samples (i.e., is it from dogs, birds, people, or other warm-blooded animals). Students Saving Salmon plans to continue the Shell Creek Salmon Stewardship project because the outreach to residents and restoration efforts should benefit existing and future salmon that utilize Shell Creek. We plan to continue planting juvenile coho salmon (from the Willow Creek Hatchery) in the upper reaches of Shell Creek to bolster the resident population. We also plan to continue pursuing avenues (such as grants) to determine the feasibility and cost of undertaking a restoration project that removes the impassable barrier (a 5-foot waterfall) and allows salmon passage to the upper reaches of Shell Creek. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to all of the EWHS students who volunteered to participate in the field monitoring project since 2015, through good weather and rainstorms: Rondi Nordal, Joe Cooper, Jared Yu, Emily McLaughlin Sta. Maria, Malia Clark, Taylor Blevins, Erin Francisco, Ava Wilson, Sabrina Liu, Emily Hoang, Farah Al-Qurishi, Olivia Park, Angela Yang, Ryan Peterson, Christina Mong, Natalie Flaherty, Gabriela McCray, Klyr Oines, Hugh Wilson, Krithik Duraisamy, Cedar Lange, Kia Mackey, Pavi Chance, Lindsey Barnes, Sam Kleven, Katharina Brinschwitz, Fatima Fatty, YeJi Oh, Afua Tiwaa, Arisbeth Acosta, Sergel Amar, Mrad Amar, Autumn Beeghley, Andie Foster, Luis Guerrero, Justin Heckt, and Malia Mackey. We also thank adult volunteers who accompanied the project leader in the field: Valerie Stewart, Peggy Foreman, Nancy Scordino, Dave Millette and Jim Ogren. We thank the City of Edmonds, especially the Public Works Department and Mike Cawrse, for their support and assistance in designing and implementing the project, providing access to the Marsh outlet 14 Packet Pg. 23 4.3.a basin, assisting in contacting Edmonds residents to gain access to their property for water monitoring, and for analyzing our water samples for fecal coliform bacteria. Special thanks to Jeanne McKenzie at the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant Lab for analyzing the water samples and conducting demonstrations for the students. We appreciate the encouragement from the Edmonds City Council, especially Diane Buckshnis, and Mayor Earling for funding support for operational expenses. The funding has allowed us to purchase critically needed calibration fluids, outreach materials, field supplies and equipment. The project would not have been possible without Hubbard Foundation grant funds in 2015 that were used by the Edmonds School District to purchase the professional multiparameter water quality instrument. Special thanks to Dave Millette, Geoff Bennett and school district administration staff for helping secure the grant and purchase the water quality meter from YSI. Grant funds secured by Sound Salmon Solutions from the Rose Foundation and by EarthCorps from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and Google.org were used to pay the costs for dissolved metals and petroleum -derived compound analyses at an accredited laboratory (ALS Environmental Laboratory in Everett, WA). Special thanks to all the property owners, especially Jenny Anttila, Ruth Blaikie, Lynn Lawrence, Judy Barry, Kristie Coates, Edmonds Park Apartments, Willow Creek Condominiums and Edmonds City Parks Department, for allowing students on their property to access the stream monitoring sites. We also thank all the property owners along lower Shell Creek who participated in our salmon survey and allowed students to access the creek on their property. REFERENCES CH2M HILL. 2004. SR 104, Edmonds Crossing Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Washington State Department of Transportation, and City of Edmonds. Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 2010. Storm and Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan - City of Edmonds. City of Edmonds Public Works Department/Engineering Division. Sea -Run Consulting, TetraTech, Inc., Reid Middleton, Inc. and Pentec. 2007. City of Edmonds Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Inventory & Characterization. Report prepared for the City of Edmonds. Shannon and Wilson, Inc. 2013. Willow Creek Daylighting - Final Early Feasibility Study. Report submitted to Edmonds Stormwater Engineering Program. Scordino, J., R. Nordal, A. Tiwaa, F. Fatty, A. Acosta, P. Chance, L. Barnes, S. Kleven, J. Cooper, J. Heckt, E. McLaughlin Sta. Maria, K. Brinschwitz, Y. Oh and A. Beeghley. 2016. Edmonds Water Quality Monitoring Project: Preliminary Report. Edmonds Stream Team Report to Edmonds City Council. Von Prause, M. 2014. River and Stream Water Quality Monitoring Report, Water Year 2013. Washington Department of Ecology Publication No. 14-03-047. 15 Packet Pg. 24 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2017 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 07-11-2017 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 25 6.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES JULY 119 2017 Elected Officials Present Mike Nelson, Councilmember (arrived 6:43 p.m.) Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember (arrived 6:31 P.M.) Mayor Dave Earling Rtnff PracPnt Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director Al Compaan, Police Chief Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Dan Swedloe, Attorney 1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM At 6:15 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PER RCW 42.30.140(1)(A) The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room in executive session to discuss collective bargaining. The executive session concluded at 6:35 p.m. 3. CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION At 6:41 p.m., the Council interviewed Kelly Sawyer, a candidate for the Edmonds Cemetery Board. This interview was held in the Jury Meeting Room and was open to the public. ADJOURN At 6:55 p.m., the interview concluded and the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 11, 2017 Page 1 Packet Pg. 26 6.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2017 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 07-11-2017 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 27 6.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES July 11, 2017 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Thomas Mesaros, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Michael Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Andrew Pierce, Legislative/Council Assistant Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS. TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Mesaros explained Audience Comments is on the agenda prior to the Approval of the Consent Agenda to provide an opportunity for the public to comment on Consent Agenda items before they are approved by Council. In addition, due to a suggestion from Councilmember Johnson, including Audience Comments on a committee meeting night agenda allows for public comment on any action items. 4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Professor David Davidson, coordinator of the Sustainable Cities Partnership between Western Washington University and the City, thanked the Council for the wonderful experience. Approximately 200 students were involved over the year including 3 who were able to complete internships necessary to graduate, 13 faculty members were involved, and 8 students were hired to do field work primarily at the cemetery. All the reports produced are available on the City's website. One of the highlights for the students was making presentations, which were often attended by Councilmembers. He also recognized incredible City staff including Shane Hope, Phil Williams, Patrick Doherty, Carrie Hite, Rob Chave, Frances Chapin, Ryan Hague, Brad Shipley, Steve Fisher, Jen Machuga, Jen Leach, and Pam Randolph. He recalled when making an earlier presentation, assuring the Council they were very cost conscious, would charge actual Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 11, 2017 Page 1 Packet Pg. 28 6.2.a costs and watch their spending. He referred to a draft invoice that indicates they underspent the budget by $8,000 over the year even with a $2,000 add -on to map headstones at the cemetery. The students were unable to develop a mobile app. He was proud the project was completed under budget and offered a heartfelt thank you. It was a learning experience for WWU as this was the launch of this program and Edmonds was their first partner. He summarized WWU got a great deal out of the project and he hoped the City received value as well. Marge Peterson, Edmonds, explained she lives on 80' Ave W between 214t' Place SW and 213' Street SW; to the right of her house is the Norwegian Woods Apartments and Royal Terrace Apartments. She requested a 7-foot height restriction on vehicles parking in front of her fence and elsewhere in Edmonds where it would be applicable. She described calling the police about a large truck that parks on the street, causing a sight distance issue for drivers. The police cannot do anything about the vehicle without a City code regarding vehicle height. The truck's owner lives in a condo at 212t' & 80t' and parks the truck for weeks at a time. She offered to pay for a parking sign that states parking only for vehicles under 7 feet. She submitted a picture of the truck parked in front of her 6-foot fence. The apartment tenants and she use the parking in front of her fence for guests and do not want a no parking sign. She commented on traffic volumes and speeding on 80t' Avenue W and many close calls due to the blind spots. She urged the Council to consider a height restriction on parked vehicles. Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, reminded of the 9t' annual car show on Saturday, June 15 at the Edmonds Church of God, 8224 220' St SW from 9 am to 3 pm as well as a rummage sale and vendors. He provided his phone number, 425-776-7130, for any questions. 5. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Teitzel requested Item 5.2 be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 27, 2017 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 4. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF CEMETERY BOARD CANDIDATE KELLY SAWYER 5. REPORT OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE CITYWIDE CIPP SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT -- HWY 99 PIPE REHABILITATION PHASE 6. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES FOR THE 76TH AVE & 212TH ST. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 7. APRIL MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT 6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 27, 2017 Councilmember Teitzel referred to a statement in the 5" paragraph on page 8 of the minutes, "Council President Mesaros referred to 100% renewable energy for municipal facilities by 2019 and asked if there Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 11, 2017 Page 2 Packet Pg. 29 6.2.a was a way to track that. Councilmember Nelson answered PUD can track that; the City can purchase electricity from PUD that comes only from renewable sources. He originally said 2025 and changed it to 2019 after conversations with PUD." Councilmember Teitzel said he has done some research and this appears to be a contradiction of information he received from PUD. If correct, this suggests Edmonds has the ability to specify to PUD the city wants only renewable energy delivered. As PUD explained to him, he was not certain that was possible. He asked Councilmember Nelson if he stood by this statement or would like to modify it. Councilmember Nelson said he stands by that statement and read a statement Councilmembers received from PUD: "Dear City of Edmonds Council Members, We would like to clam our position on our renewable energy choices: "There are many options that exist for helping the City of Edmonds reach their goal of achieving 100% renewable power, and we are hopeful that some of these options, and possibly a combination of others, may meet those needs. Snohomish County PUD is currently in the process of modernizing our solar and renewable energy programs. We recognize the growing requests of our customers to participate in solar energy and to become 100% renewable and/or carbon free. As a result, we have developed and are presenting a new program to our Commission on July 25`h. This new program will allow for our customers to purchase shares in a utility -scale solar program and/or the ability to purchase either Renewable Energy Credits or renewable energy sourced from local and regional renewable energy. We look forward to working with the City of Edmonds on a solution. " Jim West, Assistant General Manager, Customer and Energy Services. " Councilmember Teitzel said to him, purchasing renewable energy credits was not the same thing as specifying the City wants only renewable energy delivered over the power grid and asked if that was accurate. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order. Mayor Earling agreed the issue before the Council was approval of the minutes. COUNCIL PRESIDENT MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ITEM 5.2. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO. 7. ACTION ITEM 1. PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE Public Works Director Phil Williams said the proposed ordinance includes the Council's recommended changes. The changes include criteria that would be used by staff to evaluate a request/need for a modification in the noise ordinance and preparation of a memorandum/application that would be submitted to the Mayor to request an administrative variance. If the variance is granted, a copy of the memo will be sent to the City Council which is addressed in an engineering division policy. He was also seeking Council feedback on a previous discussion regarding staff providing Council a periodic report regarding the number of variances and the circumstances. Councilmember Tibbott commented the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee discussed the noise ordinance and agreed the clarification provided a significant improvement and will provide documentation of the justification used to grant the variance. He supported the idea of a report, especially after the work has been completed to determine if there were any complaints related to after-hours activities. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, TEITZEL AND Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 11, 2017 Page 3 Packet Pg. 30 TIBBOTT AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT MESAROS VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. Comment re ag rding Environmental Goals Resolution Council President Mesaros said two weeks ago the Council had a lively discussion regarding environmental goals for the City. It was a worthwhile discussion, the Council approved a good product and he was pleased the City was looking at the environmental challenges in light of the fact that the federal government is walking away from some of those challenges. However, he did not feel good about and he has received some comments about the process that the Council followed. As Council President, he helped formulate a bad process and he apologized to the Council for not scheduling the resolution as a study item. The Council was enthusiastic about the opportunity to approving the work done by Councilmembers Buckshnis and Teitzel but did not afford the opportunity for Councilmembers to reflect, discuss and offer input. He apologized and assured in the future he will ensure ample time for study and discussion prior to approval. 7. ADJOURN TO COMMITTEE MEETINGS With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned to committee meetings at 7:22 p.m. (Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee in the Jury Meeting Room, Finance Committee in Council Chambers and Public Safety & Personnel Committee in the Police Training Room.) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 11, 2017 Page 4 Packet Pg. 31 6.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Thomas J. Goebel ($292.28), and Loewyn Young ($86.99). Staff Lead: Clerks Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Linda Hynd Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Thomas J. Goebel and Loewyn Young by minute entry. Narrative Thomas J. Goebel 344 Sunset Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 ($292.28) Loewyn Young 4405 Delphi Road SW Olympia, WA 98512 ($86.99) Attachments: Goebel Claim for Damages Young Claim for Damages —Redacted Packet Pg. 32 RJECEIED 'Jul. 10 zul/ l.11 Y Vl' L' ViviuINJJN ULAIM Jr VK JJAIVJAIAL' N V VK1V1 ppMf k1J)S CITY CLERK Date Claim Form Received by City 7l2 Please take note that 7�o'was G' Xk � who c rrently re ides at N �S G' I mailing address home phone # 9 `GOY work phone # 36?�/ 3il Ad who resided at at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is '1 7s0_, is claiming damages against C 'lxkv4pnetllin the sum of $ G• arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: Q ms/ I (� r TIME: q._ /� LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 3 � 4 e11 f1 SP-A DESCRIPTION. (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of wilpesSPPJkaPp1iCaP1q,tgthe occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: License Plate # Type Auto: Yes -_'�No * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * Driver License # (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Form ReNised 05/06/14 Page 1 of 2 m a� E L O E U N zs Packet Pg. 33 6.3.a * *NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED* * I, ' O/%� ' J cae)� � being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledge that any information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may be subject to disclosu a pursuant ' 42.56. x —AW � Signature of Claimant(s) State of Wa ingt n County of ,10 �0?1S 4 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 111Qk IC}� Ji is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated- Si nature ►/ m.,-- k— Title t My appointment expires: Please present the completed claim form to Form Revised 05/06/14 City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5"' Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. f/)�i4. aU®LAG iC) _S 410,1 Op WASV'` Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 34 6.3.a W \ U n t a _4y 0 z O Y [L j d W .e d W O > H Q •� t W J Q J J LL U O E ~ U O H z cn O xx J w ❑ m ¢ O a. 0U w M U Q (n H H _ U W . O * �� ❑iu d a.r R w�ro� L t;$,x a y (^( \ G F m o -0 C Lu E ��yj •'1 � y � 3 m'� � � � � j � •�0 Ko d`` „ r• 1 r Z, d y -� m wCM Z CY Cr � 4 w C, c m.C,�.ro N 0- L 1°• ¢y1 e� q•� Q1 •- m � i / _ $ ❑ N el _ � E '.}I • � amv�mv��u Y fC �+ k, 1( "' � 3®fi t W w i W ya. L❑5 W 7 _�: m a-9 o a7 ai .0 1 y. w •" O a1 E C V p \i m�a ❑ o m U LL a��Oca Q y` W�� l��Ocam� U U Y c a y c ElW W �1�' O Q \`a mA3GE 4� C Q L❑i ❑ T�k �° m e N a ❑ Q GE z ¢ .. U 'E" 00 - y Er W w ❑ +. a+ N Q V LO Co N M W¢\ z Z e) v Q W w mS21 �C� 0' CoQ Q 7 U- �o 3Yi�_a3Li d U dS o E r ..2 O T C Y C S =c m aamov c� ❑ wE —.—.❑ LmL N cca°moco (D 0E c w o N N °m (� o 3, oa' E m ' of 0 , p c E o av LL T o N ❑ a.Q N > mx o � p w a0 a) o ac o wxo 2Q m a� No-Qocm C E U C pm Y CM W a) C cCn m Z z °a) a > .m _0 Co •v O m' U O o Eo Z H Z a .—o �NM eo W # Uc Uc Uc Ucc �a m m m m m) 5a) �m n N c>w m>❑ o a w N a Q0 Ym nv ❑Nm c c c oEmm ❑Nc_ mc aac) m❑ + UN m a) o U a) m L m m N N q - � U2U UUc❑ ❑ E CO Lu LU w0' uwi o wo cwn o ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ Packet Pg. 35 6.3.a 0GE APPLIANCES GE APPLIANCES � CHECKOUT SHIPPING & PAYMENT REVIEW & SUBMIT ORDER RECEIPT Parts Questions? Call 1-877-959-8688 Mon -Fri 8am-8pm, Sat 8:30am-5pm ET a Secure Checkout THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! Please PRINT THIS RECEIPT for your records. You will also receive an email confirmation regarding this order. If you have any questions, EMAIL US with your order number in the message or call 1-800-626-2002. Order Number 2108493 Order Date 05/25/17 SHIPPING & PAYMENT INFORMATION SHIPPING BILLING PAYMENT METHOD EMAIL ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS VISA Card ending in e_moel@msn.com Tom Goebel Tom Goebel 3587 344 Sunset Ave. 344 Sunset Ave. For security purposes, only N N the last four digits are shown. Edmonds, WA Edmonds, WA 98020 98020 3609693434 3609693434 PURCHASED ITEMS Item Quantity Unit Total Price a� 0 `0 0 E .2 U r N N N N Im M E M 0 L 0 E U 0 r c as E a Packet Pg. 36 GE® MWF REFRIGERATOR WATER FILTER 1 $49.99 MWFP Subtotal $44.9 Shipping Costs FRE1 Tax $4.63 Final Total $49.6! Terms Privacy Policy Gmkie Disclosure Contact Us Copyright 2017 GE Appliances, a Haler company GE is a trademark of the General Electric Company. Manufactured under trademark license as E c L O N E U N N N O to M 0 L O E U d d O r-� C O E t 0 2 .r r� Q 4.7 Packet Pg. 37 6.3.b RECEIVE., RECEIVED JU[_ 1 0 M? CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM JUI...1 U Z017 Date ve61�1 ' RQealvBa' y PM Please take note that (_o ew �J vN \1 o u vl a who currently resides at o — l S 61�n_r ios VA- gSS12— mailing address home phone # 206 7y5 SSSS`I , work phone # and who resided at at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is aC o ZI , 98 , is claiming damages against C l v mmQna5 in the sum of $ `d . 9_ l arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: J 7 q Zo TIME: loeyn LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: H / '-' ST swl R F5 '° Pave. �J DESCRIPTION: Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. N.\J. raua C'� 7.� 1x rrir 7-016f17 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes X No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: 2Aa--� 1P o s (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: ti , OWNER: Address: _u'4 0< v�l �,H', a �U. Address: Phone#: '10�a,�q g�,5`� Phone#: Passengers: Name: t Name: Address: _} q Lyf •^ 'PI vi Address: Form Revised 05/06/14 Page t of 2 Packet Pg. 38 "EV * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED MA10 ?017 El DMIONDS CITY CLERIC I, LW- w �-/ v` �'Io v n a , being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read We above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledge that any information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56. Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of Sp10 H 0 M'r5 0 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that L-015wYN i0�Ato (�' is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: -7 /1 O /'7—c> k -7 Signatur M �CiCr?+ t ,i 1 o� OR C� Title My appointment expires: ;, L,-k ne o f Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Mackenzie Norberg Notary Public State of Washington Commission Expires June 15, 2021 Form Revised 05/06/14 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 39 2825 Capitol Mall Dr SW Store: 375 Olympia, WA 98502 Invoice: 37500355559 360-943-9822 Salesperson: Raechelle L M Work Order 37500355515 Customer Information Vehicle Information Customer ID: A037512169 Vehicle: 2007 TOYOTA PRIUS Name: LOEWYN YOUNG Color: BLACK Address: 4405 DELPHI RD SW Mileage: 138,098 RECEIVED City, State, TUMWATER, WA 98512 License: A2506043 Phone: (206) 795-8854 hit large pothole slight shoulder wear needs alignment E MONIz� ''' ' Comments: g P g 9 ._� � �' aw cwd Oty Product Code Product Description Price/ea FET Amount 1 15812 AL3 THRUST ALIGNMENT-DOM/IMP $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 13579 THRUST ANGLE ALIGNMENT - DOMESTIC/IMPORT $79.95 $0.00 $79.95 CARS, PICKUPS, VANS Parts Subtotal: $0.00 Labor Subtotal: $79.95 Sales Tax: $7.04 Tire Tax: $0.00 Invoice $86.99 Payment Method: MC Approval# 05835Z Card# XXXXXXXXXXXX4245 $86.99 Notes To Review Adjusted front toe and camber With Customer: Air @ 35psi THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS Authorized By: LOEWYN YOUNG (206) 795-8854 05-18-17 03:36 PM $108.26 LOEWYN YOUNG (206) 795-8854 05-18-17 04:11 PM $86.99 Invoice Date/Time: 05-18-2017 05:35 PM Page 1 of 2 a� a� c� E c� L 0 rn E .5 U N d cv d I to N O] c� E L 0 E M U c O c m E t U a r Q Packet Pg. 40 6.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 May Monthly Financial Report Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Sarah Mager Background/History <Type or insert Info here> Staff Recommendation No action needed; informational only. Narrative May Monthly Financial Report Attachments: May Monthly Budgetary Financial Report Packet Pg. 41 I 6.4.a I OF EDP � d l)7C 1SOV CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT MAY 2017 Packet Pg. 42 1 I 6.4.a I Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 37,753,480 $ 18,037,636 $ 18,087,809 $ 19,665,671 480/ 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 278,630 1,424 3,507 275,123 10/ 011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 6,800 2,872 6,604 196 970/ 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 44,650 4,976 17,045 27,605 380/ 013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND - 155 - - 00/ 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,030 21 55 4,975 1°/ �F 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1 452,000 176,195 225,452 226,548 O 5001 0 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 130,000 68,589 26,984 103,016 210/ cv III STREET FUND 1,784,200 671,850 678,056 1,106,144 38°/ 'v 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2 6,397,932 3,636,759 796,116 5,601,816 120/ C 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 137,200 18,318 17,947 119,253 130/ LL 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 110 49 129 (19) 1180/ 21 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 91,200 27,812 24,694 66,506 270/ 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 24,600 7,745 11,130 13,470 450/ 2 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,800 50 482 1,318 270/ 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 30,450 9,362 8,592 21,858 280/ O 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,311,900 494,883 544,643 767,257 420/ N 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 1,314,400 495,070 545,590 768,810 420/ 04 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 50,390 28,070 26,521 23,869 530/ p O. 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 280 105 277 3 990/ G1 W 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 177,820 65,277 87,340 90,480 490ca 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 3 2,616,940 899,086 258,410 2,358,530 100/ _ 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 1,070 418 1,100 (30) 1030/ C 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUSTFD 22,880 10,079 16,188 6,692 710/ LL 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,010 3,263 2,501 7,509 250/ +0, d 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT - 294,705 - - 00/ 0 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 50,403 50,582 (50,582) 00/ m 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 14,400 773 - 14,400 00/ �+ s 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 695,830 42,996 40,146 655,684 60/ O 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND - 936,429 - - 00/ 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 72,634 68,484 (68,484) 00/ 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 8 469 570 3 394 178 3 228 162 5 241 408 380/ 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 4,789,173 1,696,034 1,821,319 2,967,854 380/ 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 4 12,179,879 4,118,270 4,746,617 7,433,262 390/ 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,720 4 3 1,988,717 00/ 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,628,910 680,170 804,376 824,534 490/ 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 946,040 - 423,020 523,020 450/ 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 66,000 49,591 51,494 14,506 780/ $ 83,422,294 $ 35,996,252 $ 32,621,373 $ 50,800,921 390/ Difference between 2016 and 2017 is due to grant invoicing for Fishing Pier Rehab. 2 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is due to grant invoicing for various projects. 3 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are due to parks donations and park impact fees. 4 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is primarily due to invoicing timing difference. 1 Packet Pg. 43 6.4.a Page 1 of 1 CPI'Y OF EDMONDS EXPENDTITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERALFUND5 $ 40,069,055 $ 16,509,045 $ 15,723,883 $ 24,345,172 39°/ 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 293,460 107,407 137,220 156,240 47°/ 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 100,000 - 80,601 19,399 810/( 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,400 - - 5,400 0°/ 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 545,500 406,593 130,590 414,910 240/( 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 76,030 27,503 16,523 59,507 22°/ III STREET FUND 1,935,260 764,656 731,726 1,203,534 0 38°/ CL 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 6 6,427,332 1,776,209 1,203,780 5,223,552 19°/ 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 181,880 10,155 16,393 165,487 90/( .� t) 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 99,600 21,432 29,591 70,009 30°/ cc 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 - - 26,880 00/( LL 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 2,000 477 417 1,583 2 1 % t 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 61,700 8,598 6,230 55,470 10°/ O 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2,962,566 177,049 443,591 2,518,975 1501( 2 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 2,395,021 476,669 2,062 2,392,959 0°/ �p �Z 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 51,220 7,299 997 50,223 2°/ 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 217,020 61,642 68,158 148,862 310/( N 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 2 2,955,000 623,725 332,942 2,622,058 cm 11% v 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,500 10 109 10,391 1°/ O 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT - 294,705 - - 0°/ 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 9,359 13,167 (13,167) 0°/ c0 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 16,450 - - 16,450 0°/ 'v C 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 695,830 - 695,830 0°/ C 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND - 936,429 - - 0°/ LL 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 13,257,452 2,639,215 2,368,749 10,888,703 18°/ c?-% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 8,351,547 1,131,281 1,392,215 6,959,332 r� 17°/ 4 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 8 16,714,828 3,071,169 3,931,716 12,783,112 24°/ j m 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,989,720 - - 1,989,720 0°/ 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,886,000 751,060 820,408 1,065,592 43°/ r C 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 890,430 - 327,297 563,133 37°/ 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 72,070 18,185 29,209 42,861 41°/ >, 1a $ 102,289,751 $ 29,829,870 $ 27,807,574 $ 74,482,177 27% 5 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are primarily due to final payment of 2014 debt. 6 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are due to construction projects expenses in 2016. 7 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are due to purchase of Civic Field in 2016. 8 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are due to construction projects in 2017. 2 Packet Pg. 44 I 6.4.a I Page 1 of 3 CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining °%, Received TAXES: REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 9 EM S PROPERTY TAX 10 VOTED PROPERTY TAX LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 11 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX GAS UTILITY TAX SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX WATER UTILITY TAX SEWER UTILITY TAX STORM WATER UTILITY TAX T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX PULLTABS TAX AMUSEMENT GAMES LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LICENSES AND PERMITS: FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE POLICE - FINGERPRINTING PROF AND OCC LICENSE -TAXI AMUSEMENTS VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION FRANCHISE AGREEM ENT-COM CAST FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-VERIZON/FRONTIER FRANCHISE AGREEM ENT-BLACKROCK OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS ANIMAL LICENSES STREET AND CURB PERMIT OTR NON -BUS LIC/PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL: DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST WAASSOC OF SHERIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT WATERFRONT ANALYSIS GRANT PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX M VET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION -STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS MARIJUANA ENFORCEMENT DUI - CITIES LIQUOR EXCISE TAX LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS MISCELLANEOUS INTERLOCAL REVENUE INTERLOCAL GRANTS VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS $ 10,221,670 $ 5,294,068 $ 5,428,806 $ 4,792,864 53% 3,911,080 1,937,393 2,099,571 1,811,509 54% 10,000 499,419 11,568 (1,568) 116% 6,875,000 2,754,132 2,970,761 3,904,239 43% 7,040 3,021 5,457 1,583 78% 687,500 273,302 284,676 402,824 41% 1,604,000 801,429 863,230 740,770 54% 608,000 352,987 429,203 178,797 71% 313,600 135,323 115,753 197,847 37% 1,235,300 457,539 351,278 884,022 28% 632,300 264,203 227,620 404,680 36% 331,300 143,281 132,246 199,054 40% 857,600 355,558 361,872 495,728 42% 1,263,200 532,012 492,059 771,141 39% 52,000 25,643 27,488 24,512 53% 40 141 - 40 0% 262,300 63,371 64,626 197,674 25% 28,871,930 13,892,824 13,866,215 15,005,715 48% 250 160 - 250 0% 300 165 328 (28) 109% 330 - - 330 0% 4,740 - 6,325 (1,585) 133% 50,000 1,854 3,070 46,930 6% 716,800 358,427 364,826 351,974 51% 42,100 17,649 17,644 24,456 42% 102,300 50,705 54,268 48,032 53% 16,600 8,172 7,511 9,089 45% 298,200 138,558 148,736 149,464 50% 116,600 71,010 57,285 59,315 49% 44,940 21,240 30,552 14,389 68% 67,800 41,050 41,050 26,750 61% 10,700 44,623 11,880 (1,180) 111% 620,600 295,154 332,255 288,345 54% 35,090 8,973 10,929 24,161 31% 48,150 16,122 16,691 31,459 35% 13,200 7,088 6,863 6,337 52% 2,188,700 1,080,948 1,110,211 1,078,489 51% 7,930 6,920 5,949 1,981 75% - 995 - - 0% 4,000 633 1,030 2,970 26% 7,100 2,663 3,272 3,828 46% - 89,160 10,000 (10,000) 0% 195,500 - - 195,500 0% 12,680 5,441 5,657 7,023 45% 18,000 9,150 4,179 13,821 23% 42,500 19,893 20,581 21,919 48% 23,700 - - 23,700 0% 3,000 3,166 3,119 (119) 104% 191,000 96,625 100,033 90,967 52% 345,600 87,409 86,358 259,242 25% - 75,707 - - 0% - - 35,000 (35,000) 0% 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 100% 853,010 399,762 277,178 575,833 32% ' 2017 Real Personal/Property Tax revenues are $134,738 higher than 2016 revenues. 10 2017 EMS PropertyTax revenues are $162,178 higher than 2016 revenues. 11 2017 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $216,628 higher than 2016 revenues. Please also see pages pages 18 & 19. 3 Packet Pg. 45 I 6.4.a I Page 2 of 3 CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS 2,000 1,085 1,993 8 100% ATM SURCHARGE FEES 300 19 81 219 27% CREDIT CARD FEES 15,000 - 4,236 10,764 28% D/M COURT REC SER 10 3 157 (147) 1570% MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 600 235 110 490 18% SALE MAPS & BOOKS 100 - 23 77 23% CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 25,100 - 25,100 0% BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 600 - - 600 0% PHOTOCOPIES 2,000 425 233 1,767 12% POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 4,000 1,452 1,408 2,592 35% ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 200,000 85,828 219,999 (19,999) 110% Q. SNO-ISLE 58,000 33,996 43,937 14,063 76% 4) PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 17,000 9,450 11,525 5,475 68% POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 30,000 - - 30,000 0% v CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 66,280 - 243 66,037 0% C WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 42,000 20,907 34,067 7,933 81% MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 1,500 - - 1,500 0% IL DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES 300 - - 300 0% FIRE PROTECTION & EMS FOR DUI - 26 32 (32) 0% w FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 45,000 28,234 30,505 14,495 68% C LEGAL SERVICES - 6 - - 0% 0 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 56,000 32,428 20,225 35,775 36% BOOKING FEES 4,200 1,721 1,245 2,955 30% t0 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 8,560 11,616 7,122 1,438 83% 2 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 8,000 3,630 1,964 6,036 25% EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 824,200 487,513 423,461 400,739 51% N FIBER SERVICES - 5,330 - - 0% N INTERGOVERNMENTAL FIBER SERVICES - 3,000 - - 0% v FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 1,800 630 659 1,141 37% C ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 250 184 15 235 6% Q. ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 80,250 35,895 33,853 46,397 42% PLAN CHECKING FEES 428,000 198,022 159,412 268,588 37% FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 3,210 5,040 3,505 (295) 109% •T PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 1,600 1,588 633 967 40% C S.E.P.A. REVIEW 2,140 610 4,690 (2,550) 219% CRITICAL AREA STUDY 18,190 8,615 6,090 12,100 33% jL DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 11,460 4,633 4,775 6,686 42% GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 12,000 5,952 6,844 5,156 57% LOCKER FEES - - 15 (15) 0% G� PROGRAM FEES 910,100 536,967 473,826 436,274 52% TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 1,300 7,564 862 438 66% 7 WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 5,000 25 5,000 0% M BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 750 50 750 0% INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS 2,044,540 712,042 956,464 1,088,076 47% 4,931,340 2,244,722 2,454,209 2,477,131 50% p 4 Packet Pg. 46 I 6.4.a I Page 3 of 3 CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received FINES AND FORFEITURES: PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 7,200 2,956 2,193 5,007 30% TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 32,800 81,038 92,456 (59,656) 282% NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 232,500 27,374 14,465 218,035 6% CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 20,700 8,448 8,648 12,052 42% NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES - 38,275 400 (400) 0% OTHERINFRACTIONS'04 2,100 863 1,411 689 67% PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 25,300 11,185 20,591 4,709 81% PARK/INDDISZONE 3,600 1,528 1,339 2,261 37% DWI PENALTIES 8,000 14,007 2,810 5,190 35% DUI - DP ACCT 2,800 1,183 890 1,910 32% CRIM CNV FEE DUI 500 219 87 413 17% OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN - - 114 (114) 0% CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 33,600 13,467 14,132 19,468 42% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 2,000 1,038 1,216 784 61% CRIM CONY FEE CT 2,000 841 699 1,301 35% OTHER NON-TRAF M ISDEM EANOR PEN - - 32 (32) 0% OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 9,300 4,382 4,099 5,201 44% COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 600 134 295 305 49% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 1,900 737 318 1,582 17% CRIM CONY FEE CN 500 247 200 300 40% CRIMINAL COST S-RECOUPM ENTS 30,900 12,706 4,468 26,432 14% PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPM ENT 25,600 10,795 7,544 18,056 29% BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 6,000 2,202 3,774 2,226 63% COURT INTERPRETER COSTS 100 65 188 (88) 188% BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 11,000 9,800 7,530 3,470 68% MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 1,400 240 1,200 200 86% 460,400 243,728 191,100 269,300 420/6 MISCELLANEOUS: INVESTMENT INTEREST INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS PARKING SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS BRACKET ROOM RENTAL LEASES LONG-TERM OTHER RENTS & USE CHARGES PARKS DONATIONS BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS VOLUNTEER PICNIC CONTRIBUTIONS POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES OTHER MISC REVENUES SMALL OVERPAYMENT NSF FEES - PARKS & REC NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT NSF FEES - POLICE US BANK REBATE TRANS FERS -IN: INSURANCE RECOVERIES TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 40,400 13,434 35,678 4,722 88% 5,700 2,242 3,913 1,787 69% 5,400 2,224 2,665 2,735 49% 15,600 6,206 7,786 7,814 50% 147,000 42,699 35,614 111,386 24% 5,000 2,560 2,440 2,560 49% 175,000 75,506 76,984 98,016 44% 2,400 1,500 1,500 900 63% 4,350 3,750 3,550 800 82% 1,500 200 250 1,250 17% 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 1,000 - 1,000 0% 300 - 254 46 85% 3,000 2,481 617 2,383 21% 2,000 - - 2,000 0% 2,000 125 7 1,993 0% 200 150 76 124 38% - 15,008 57 (57) 0% 2,000 4,702 5,477 (3,477) 274% 30 16 13 17 43% 120 - - 120 0% 300 134 154 146 51% - - 60 (60) 0% 7,500 2,714 4,659 2,841 62% 421,800 175,653 181,753 240,047 43% - - 7,143 (7,143) 0% 26,300 - 26,300 0% 26,300 - 7,143 19,157 27% $ 37,753,480 $ 18,037,636 $ 18,087,809 $ 19,665,671 48% F O C. d C to ILC t C O to O N N N 5 Packet Pg. 47 I 6.4.a I Page 1 of 6 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 14,718,310 $ 5,579,476 $ 5,723,177 $ 8,995,133 39% OVERTIME 485,880 188,728 200,580 285,300 41% HOLIDAY BUY BACK 226,420 2,349 1,324 225,096 1% BENEFITS 5,496,060 2,116,667 2,216,345 3,279,715 40% UNIFORMS 85,110 40,835 24,641 60,469 29% SUPPLIES 376,509 125,824 127,877 248,632 34% SMALL EQUIPMENT 50,040 48,057 30,240 19,800 60% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,677,883 1,022,665 1,008,260 2,669,623 27% COMMUNICATIONS 182,180 62,869 59,112 123,068 32% TRAVEL 50,430 10,340 17,865 32,565 35% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 - 1,470 5,030 23% ADVERTISING - 1,284 - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 1,707,550 384,599 708,262 999,288 41% INSURANCE 609,550 538,732 616,495 (6,945) 101% UTILITIES 457,800 177,075 188,561 269,239 41% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 223,800 108,132 143,208 80,592 64% MISCELLANEOUS 395,500 198,425 142,381 253,119 36% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 9,823,140 4,954,295 4,445,405 5,377,735 45% INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 135,000 - - 135,000 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,080,200 936,429 45,000 1,035,200 4% BUILDINGS 18,323 - - 18,323 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 58,000 - 9,694 48,306 17% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 164,790 - - 164,790 0% OTHER DEBT 500 - - 500 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 39,580 12,265 13,990 25,591 35% $ 40,069,055 $ 16,509,045 $ 15,723,883 $ 24,345,172 39% LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009) BENEFITS INHOME LTC CLAIMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAVEL MISCELLANEOUS RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (011) MISCELLANEOUS HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIRS & MAINTENANENCE MISCELLANEOUS MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND (104) FUEL CONSUMED SMALL EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR/M AINT MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES $ 183,190 $ 72,346 $ 87,193 $ 95,997 48% 102,990 32,871 49,627 53,363 48% 7,000 1,286 - 7,000 0% - 179 - - 0% 280 725 400 (120) 143% $ 293,460 $ 107,407 $ 137,220 $ 156,240 47% $ 100,000 $ - $ 80,601 $ 19,399 81% 100,000 s - 80,601 19,399 81% $ 100 $ - $ $ 100 0% 200 - 200 0% 5,100 - 5,100 0% $ 5,400 $ - $ $ 5,400 0% $ - $ 1,756 $ - $ 0% 2,000 87,474 21,186 (19,186) 1059% 193,500 35,390 50,764 142,736 26% - 546 - - 0% - 169,691 - - 0% 350,000 111,737 58,640 291,360 17% 545,500 406,593 $ 130,590 $ 414,910 24% $ 3,000 $ 515 $ 817 $ 2,183 27% 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 2,230 730 668 1,562 30% 800 - - 800 0% 20,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 25% 45,000 21,257 10,038 34,962 22% 76,030 $ 27,503 $ 16,523 $ 59,507 22% F O C. O C cc C M t w C O ea O N N N 6 Packet Pg. 48 I 6.4.a I Page 2 of 6 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent STREET FUND (111) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 555,070 $ 236,041 $ 222,917 $ 332,153 40% OVERTIME 18,400 9,569 13,653 4,747 74% BENEFITS 318,720 123,594 112,341 206,379 35% UNIFORMS 6,000 3,745 3,667 2,333 61% SUPPLIES 350,000 107,689 76,997 273,003 22% SMALL EQUIPMENT 24,000 545 1,124 22,876 5% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,050 4,119 8,582 6,468 57% COMMUNICATIONS 3,500 1,473 3,165 335 90% TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 181,020 78,817 74,682 106,338 41% INSURANCE 113,230 97,912 110,508 2,722 98% UTILITIES 270,170 92,135 91,723 178,447 34% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 44,000 7,912 11,000 33,000 25% MISCELLANEOUS 25,000 350 1,007 23,993 4% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 5,000 754 7 4,993 0% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,490 - - 3,490 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 1,610 - 354 1,256 22% $ 1,935,260 $ 764,656 $ 731,726 $ 1,203,534 38% COMBINED STREET CONS T/IMPROVE (112) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE INTERFUND SUBSIDIES LAND MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST MUNICIPALARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAVEL RENTAL/LEASE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS HOTEUMOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS INTERFUND SUBSIDIES EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) MISCELLANEOUS TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS $ 2,380,040 $ 422,325 $ 463,882 $ 1,916,158 19% - - 34,602 (34,602) 0% 328,100 - - 328,100 0% - 132,876 - - 0% - - 8,166 (8,166) 0% 3,643,922 1,145,410 621,893 3,022,029 17% 72,220 72,201 72,201 19 100% 3,050 3,396 3,035 15 100% $ 6,427,332 $ 1,776,209 $ 1,203,780 $ 5,223,552 19% $ 4,700 $ 112 $ 543 $ 4,157 12% 1,700 150 762 938 45% 166,500 7,232 12,867 153,633 8% 80 11 11 70 13% 2,000 - - 2,000 0% 300 - - 300 0% 6,600 2,650 2,210 4,390 33% $ 181,880 $ 10,155 $ 16,393 $ 165,487 9% $ 83,400 $ 21,382 $ 29,591 $ 53,809 35% 12,200 49 - 12,200 0% 4,000 - - 4,000 0% $ 99,600 $ 21,432 $ 29,591 $ 70,009 30% $ 1,790 $ - $ $ 1,790 0% 25,090 - 25,090 0% $ 26,880 $ - $ $ 26,880 0% $ 2,000 $ 477 $ 417 $ 1,583 21% $ 2,000 $ 477 $ 417 $ 1,583 21% $ 57,200 $ 7,337 $ 6,230 $ 50,970 11% 4,500 1,260 - 4,500 0% $ 61,700 $ 8,598 $ 6,230 $ 55,470 10% F O C. O C cc C M 21 t C O 2 O N N N 7 Packet Pg. 49 I 6.4.a I Page 3 of 6 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 (125) SUPPLIES $ 21,000 $ 35,419 $ 40,012 $ (19,012) 191% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150,000 24,684 69,491 80,510 46% RENTAL/LEASE - 2,790 - - 0% UTILITIES - - 1,649 (1,649) 0% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 140,000 12,605 - 140,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS - 181 - - 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,651,566 101,371 332,440 2,319,126 13% $ 2,962,566 $ 177,049 $ 443,591 $ 2,518,975 15% REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ (126) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES LAND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS INTEREST GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS INTERFUND SUBSIDIES CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT (130) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL RENTAL/LEASE UTILITIES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (132) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS S IS TER CITY COMMIS S ION (138) SUPPLIES TRAVEL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT (139) INSURANCE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES $ 101,855 $ $ $ 101,855 0% 142,330 - 142,330 0% 200,000 476,669 200,000 0% 1,921,206 - 1,921,206 0% 20,280 20,280 0% 9,350 - 2,062 7,288 22% $ 2,395,021 $ 476,669 $ 2,062 $ 2,392,959 0% $ 17,820 $ 999 $ 997 $ 16,823 6% 6,500 6,300 - 6,500 0% 600 - 600 0% 26,300 - - 26,300 0% $ 51,220 $ 7,299 $ 997 $ 50,223 2% $ 124,410 $ 31,818 $ 31,237 $ 93,173 25% 3,500 805 2,425 1,075 69% 35,910 14,264 14,702 21,208 41% 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 7,000 581 1,044 5,956 15% 20,000 7,063 4,709 15,291 24% 4,200 294 4,811 (611) 115% 1,410 416 551 859 39% 500 - - 500 0% 10,790 4,813 4,496 6,294 42% 3,800 300 1,635 2,165 43% 500 - - 500 0% 4,000 1,288 2,548 1,452 64% $ 217,020 $ 61,642 $ 68,158 $ 148,862 31% $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 0% 600,000 29,164 22,334 577,666 4% - 475,710 - - 0% 2,335,000 118,851 310,608 2,024,392 13% $ 2,955,000 $ 623,725 $ 332,942 $ 2,622,058 11% $ 1,500 $ 10 $ 109 $ 1,391 7% 4,500 - 4,500 0% 4,500 - 4,500 0% $ 10,500 $ 10 $ 109 $ 10,391 1% $ $ 2,500 $ $ 0% 292,205 0% $ $ 294,705 $ $ 0% O C. O C to C IL A t C O 2 0 N N N 8 Packet Pg. 50 I 6.4.a I Page 4 of 6 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140) SUPPLIES $ $ 789 $ 842 $ (842) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,924 11,396 (11,396) 0% MISCELLANEOUS 645 930 (930) 0% $ $ 9,359 $ 13,167 $ (13,167) 0% LID FUND CONTROL(211) INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $ 16,450 $ - $ - $ 16,450 0% $ 16,450 $ - $ $ 16,450 0% 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND $ 565,450 $ - $ $ 565,450 0% INTEREST 129,880 - 129,880 0% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 - 500 0% $ 695,830 $ - $ $ 695,830 0% 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND (232) 2014 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT INTEREST WATER FUND (421) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL EXCISE TAXES RENTAL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST $ $ 933,208 $ $ 0% 3,221 0% $ $ 936,429 $ $ 0% $ 844,510 $ 320,703 $ 316,924 $ 527,586 38% 24,000 8,806 9,858 14,142 41% 405,720 149,181 143,288 262,432 35% 4,000 914 4,346 (346) 109% 150,000 30,653 65,627 84,373 44% 1,667,500 431,122 513,039 1,154,461 31% 143,000 42,592 92,779 50,221 65% 19,730 1,537 2,049 17,681 10% 2,181,281 402,413 494,456 1,686,825 23% 30,000 12,602 10,607 19,393 35% 200 - - 200 0% 340,000 153,105 136,919 203,081 40% 146,130 41,280 59,734 86,396 41% 56,050 52,335 58,214 (2,164) 104% 35,000 9,995 11,363 23,637 32% 17,500 1,819 20,049 (2,549) 115% 83,500 30,823 38,161 45,339 46% 30,000 11,110 12,948 17,052 43% 1,229,110 457,539 351,278 877,832 29% 725,820 - - 725,820 0% 25,000 - 25,000 0% 4,488,771 453,681 4,488,771 0% 2,340 - 2,340 0% 335,510 - - 335,510 0% 25,840 25,839 25,839 1 100% 246,940 1,163 1,272 245,668 1% $ 13,257,452 $ 2,639,215 $ 2,368,749 $ 10,888,703 18% F O C. O 2 U C to C IL 21 t C O 2 eo O N N N 9 Packet Pg. 51 I 6.4.a I Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent STORM FUND (422) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 523,320 $ 225,113 $ 253,992 $ 269,328 49% OVERTIME 6,000 4,047 6,549 (549) 109% BENEFITS 262,680 110,903 124,278 138,402 47% UNIFORMS 6,500 5,210 3,976 2,524 61% SUPPLIES 46,000 8,479 18,853 27,147 41% SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,730 - 5,880 (150) 103% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,185,624 307,163 443,563 1,742,061 20% COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 1,006 2,468 732 77% TRAVEL 4,300 200 - 4,300 0% EXCISE TAXES 55,000 23,138 35,967 19,033 65% RENTAL/LEASE 264,970 103,416 108,398 156,572 41% INSURANCE 71,540 63,187 72,028 (488) 101% UTILITES 10,500 4,252 4,724 5,776 45% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 13,000 1,600 13,729 (729) 106% MISCELLANEOUS 101,000 20,355 38,580 62,420 38% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 150,000 72,215 48,301 101,699 32% INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 330,430 143,281 132,246 198,184 40% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 411,950 4,923 - 411,950 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,459,813 (713) 36,649 3,423,164 1% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 85,440 - - 85,440 0% REVENUE BONDS 164,000 - - 164,000 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 32,070 32,063 32,063 8 100% INTEREST 158,480 1,443 9,971 148,509 6% SEWER FUND (423) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES FUEL CONSUMED SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL EXCISE TAXES RENTAL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT INTERFUND SUBSIDIES MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS BOND RESERVE FUND (424) REVENUE BONDS INTEREST OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS $ 8,351,547 $ 1,131,281 $ 1,392,215 $ 6,959,332 170/. $ 1,783,120 $ 713,506 $ 703,308 $ 1,079,812 39% 95,000 30,468 41,179 53,821 43% 784,430 322,205 314,741 469,689 40% 9,500 4,476 6,910 2,590 73% 417,200 98,939 75,138 342,062 18% 80,000 19,151 35,030 44,970 44% 4,000 - - 4,000 0% 62,730 19,201 7,448 55,282 12% 1,837,472 566,729 727,849 1,109,623 40% 43,000 16,244 15,074 27,926 35% 5,000 1,097 - 5,000 0% 170,000 81,809 81,638 88,362 48% 306,650 74,732 126,313 180,337 41% 109,270 105,637 115,442 (6,172) 106% 1,217,860 315,468 307,986 909,874 25% 340,000 120,352 72,976 267,024 21% 117,950 21,351 53,768 64,182 46% 178,000 71,403 42,266 135,734 24% 629,140 264,203 227,620 401,520 36% 2,065,570 - - 2,065,570 0% 110,000 - - 110,000 0% 5,854,736 54,182 797,220 5,057,516 14% 132,950 - - 132,950 0% 75,510 - - 75,510 0% 171,240 157,034 157,346 13,894 92% 114,500 10,028 19,645 94,855 17% - 2,955 2,821 (2,821) 0% $ 16,714,828 $ 3,071,169 $ 3,931,716 $ 12,783,112 24% $ 680,020 $ - $ $ 680,020 0% 1,308,700 - 1,308,700 0% 1,000 - 1,000 0% $ 1,989,720 $ - $ $ 1,989,720 0% 10 Packet Pg. 52 I 6.4.a I Page 6 of 6 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 238,360 $ 91,487 $ 99,218 $ 139,142 42% OVERTIME 2,000 - - 2,000 0% BENEFITS 103,580 40,508 43,526 60,054 42% UNIFORMS 1,000 559 519 481 52% SUPPLIES 110,000 41,741 25,449 84,551 23% FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 0% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 294,200 54,657 82,923 211,277 28% SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 1,506 652 57,348 1% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44,000 580 702 43,298 2% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,000 901 2,099 30% TRAVEL 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 15,350 8,225 6,176 9,174 40% INSURANCE 29,010 29,967 26,351 2,659 91% UTILITIES 14,000 5,646 6,510 7,490 46% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,000 29,253 18,203 41,797 30% MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 3,055 2,679 9,321 22% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 - 13 2,487 1% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 897,000 441,877 506,587 390,413 56% $ 1,886,000 $ 751,060 $ 820,408 $ 1,065,592 43% TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 277,270 $ - $ 116,048 $ 161,222 42% OVERTIME 2,000 - 30 1,970 2% BENEFITS 92,150 - 38,243 53,907 42% SUPPLIES 5,000 - 11,183 (6,183) 224% SMALL EQUIPMENT 23,000 - 17,584 5,416 76% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114,000 - 15,589 98,411 14% COMMUNICATIONS 65,270 - 19,029 46,241 29% TRAVEL 1,500 - 983 517 66% RENTAL/LEASE 7,850 - 2,339 5,511 30% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 241,390 - 98,843 142,547 41% MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 - 7,426 (2,426) 149% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - - 56,000 0% $ 890,430 $ - $ 327,297 $ 563,133 37% FHU EPPS PENSION FUND (617) BENEFITS $ 22,550 $ 7,674 $ 10,041 $ 12,509 45% PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 48,320 10,297 19,168 29,152 40% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200 214 - 1,200 0% $ 72,070 $ 18,185 $ 29,209 $ 42,861 41% TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS $ 102,289,751 $ 29,829,870 $ 27,807,574 $ 74,482,177 27% 11 Packet Pg. 53 6.4.a Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN S UMMARY 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL $ 376,120 $ 71,981 $ 118,441 $ 257,679 31% OFFICE OF MAYOR 276,700 106,249 113,581 163,119 41% HUMAN RESOURCES 456,490 146,734 152,171 304,319 33% MUNICIPAL COURT 994,140 366,411 407,638 586,502 41% CITY CLERK 639,670 234,593 282,468 357,202 44% O FINANCE 1,049,560 614,466 453,448 596,112 43% 0 CITYATTORNEY 818,780 286,857 331,290 487,490 40% NON -DEPARTMENTAL 12,713,920 6,679,708 5,385,911 7,328,009 42% to POLICE SERVICES 10,527,420 3,832,659 4,002,270 6,525,150 38% C LL COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV. 568,230 183,771 213,705 354,525 38% �+ t DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3,056,387 985,455 1,076,107 1,980,280 35% C PARKS & RECREATION 4,116,740 1,333,112 1,417,439 2,699,301 34% 2 PUBLIC WORKS 2,879,870 1,071,371 1,096,638 1,783,232 38% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,595,028 595,677 672,777 922,251 42% p N $ 40,069,055 $ 16,509,045 $ 15,723,883 $ 24,345,172 39% N CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent WATER UTILITY FUND $ 13,257,452 $ 2,639,215 $ 2,368,749 $ 10,888,703 18% STORM UTILITY FUND 8,351,547 1,131,281 1,392,215 6,959,332 17% SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 16,714,828 3,071,169 3,931,716 12,783,112 24% BOND RESERVE FUND 1,989,720 - - 1,989,720 0% $ 40,313,547 $ 6,841,665 $ 7,692,681 $ 32,620,866 19% 12 Packet Pg. 54 I 6.4.a I Page 1 of 4 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL SALARIES $ 158,170 $ 38,241 $ 65,952 $ 92,218 42% OVERTIME 1,000 - - 1,000 0% BENEFITS 108,520 28,956 42,638 65,882 39% SUPPLIES 2,000 725 566 1,434 28% SMALL EQUIPMENT - - 285 (285) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 62,160 1,432 1,644 60,516 3% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,200 1,501 1,500 50% TRAVEL 6,700 1,207 45 6,655 1% RENTAL/LEASE 9,070 219 3,575 5,495 39% REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 25,000 - 2,236 22,764 9% $ 376,120 $ 71,981 $ 118,441 $ 257,679 31% OFFICE OF MAYOR SALARIES $ 202,230 $ 82,284 $ 84,304 $ 117,926 42% BENEFITS 49,670 20,029 20,477 29,193 41% SUPPLIES 1,500 511 200 1,300 13% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000 946 1,582 418 79% COMMUNICATION 1,400 497 590 810 42% TRAVEL 4,000 538 516 3,484 13% RENTAL/LEASE 11,450 645 4,721 6,729 41% MISCELLANEOUS 4,450 800 1,191 3,259 27% $ 276,700 $ 106,249 $ 113,581 $ 163,119 41% HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES $ 249,980 $ 89,036 $ 91,921 $ 158,059 37% OVERTIME - 43 369 (369) 0% BENEFITS 79,390 30,072 31,035 48,355 39% SUPPLIES 2,300 2,120 383 1,917 17% SMALL EQUIPMENT 300 - 110 190 37% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 78,000 20,476 9,692 68,308 12% COMMUNICATIONS 700 383 503 197 72% TRAVEL 1,000 386 260 740 26% RENTAL/LEASE 19,790 588 9,384 10,406 47% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 7,850 - 7,056 794 90% MISCELLANEOUS 17,180 3,631 1,457 15,723 8% $ 456,490 $ 146,734 $ 151171 $ 304,319 33% MUNICIPAL COURT SALARIES $ 609,690 $ 235,424 $ 248,770 $ 360,920 41% OVERTIME 600 28 434 166 72% BENEFITS 222,520 86,468 94,769 127,751 43% SUPPLIES 6,700 3,704 3,848 2,852 57% SMALL EQUIPMENT 900 262 232 668 26% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 73,000 31,107 33,146 39,854 45% COMMUNICATIONS 2,100 1,062 995 1,105 47% TRAVEL 4,500 878 1,139 3,361 25% RENTAL/LEASE 39,280 402 16,479 22,801 42% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,250 794 526 724 42% MISCELLANEOUS 33,600 6,283 7,299 26,301 22% $ 994,140 $ 366,411 $ 407,638 $ 586,502 41% 13 Packet Pg. 55 I 6.4.a I Page 2 of 4 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining °/ Spent CITY CLERK SALARIES AND WAGES $ 326,390 $ 145,646 $ 136,075 $ 190,315 42% OVERTIME 1,000 1,509 - 1,000 0% BENEFITS 140,440 55,128 61,090 79,350 43% SUPPLIES 10,240 2,052 2,144 8,096 21% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 500 - - 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,310 6,834 13,535 14,775 48% COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 7,031 12,869 37,131 26% TRAVEL 1,000 - 315 685 31% RENTAL/LEASE 50,810 7,118 23,197 27,613 46% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 27,480 6,343 29,392 (1,912) 107% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 2,432 3,850 150 96% $ 639,670 $ 234,593 $ 282,468 $ 357,202 44% FINANCE SALARIES $ 696,560 $ 345,065 $ 280,633 $ 415,927 40% OVERTIME 4,500 1,308 - 4,500 0% BENEFITS 223,910 117,003 91,594 132,316 41% SUPPLIES 7,350 2,600 2,413 4,937 33% SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,650 24,018 906 1,744 34% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,800 14,585 21,663 11,137 66% COMMUNICATIONS 2,000 21,508 788 1,212 39% TRAVEL 2,600 833 940 1,660 36% RENTAL/LEASE 30,340 2,992 13,348 16,992 44% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 38,500 32,999 40,372 (1,872) 105% MISCELLANEOUS 8,350 51,555 790 7,560 9% $ 1,049,560 $ 614,466 $ 453,448 $ 596,112 43% CITY ATTORNEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 818,780 $ 284,721 $ 331,290 $ 487,490 40% MISCELLANEOUS - 2,137 - - 0% $ 818,780 $ 286,857 $ 331,290 $ 487,490 40% NON -DEPARTMENTAL SALARIES $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 0% BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT 25,000 1,037 811 24,189 3% SUPPLIES 5,000 2,005 524 4,476 10% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 726,430 192,620 214,772 511,658 30% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 1,284 1,470 5,030 23% RENTAL/LEASE 10,480 3,600 6,467 4,013 62% INSURANCE 609,550 538,732 616,495 (6,945) 101% MISCELLANEOUS 69,000 47,715 49,056 19,944 71% INTERGOVT SERVICES 12 9,741,890 4,944,021 4,437,328 5,304,562 46% ECA LOAN PAYMENT 135,000 - - 135,000 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 13 1,080,200 936,429 45,000 1,035,200 4% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 164,790 - - 164,790 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 39,580 12,265 13,990 25,591 35% FISCAL AGENT FEES 500 500 0% $ 12,713,920 $ 6,679,708 $ 5,385,911 $ 7,328,009 42% 12 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is due to completion of Fire District One Retro Payments in 2016. 13 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are primarily due to final payment of 2014 debt. 14 O C. O C to C IL 21 t C O 2 ea O N N N Packet Pg. 56 1 I 6.4.a I Page 3 of 4 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent POLICE SERVICES SALARIES $ 6,209,630 $ 2,352,467 $ 2,373,821 $ 3,835,809 38% OVERTIME 454,780 169,686 186,297 268,483 41% HOLIDAY BUYBACK 226,420 2,349 1,324 225,096 1% BENEFITS 2,332,980 910,415 926,245 1,406,735 40% UNIFORMS 75,450 37,109 20,031 55,419 27% SUPPLIES 88,500 27,114 25,821 62,679 29% SMALL EQUIPMENT 28,210 12,471 12,388 15,822 44% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 117,670 37,109 39,642 78,028 34% COMMUNICATIONS 50,820 10,114 15,880 34,940 31% TRAVEL 17,310 2,399 8,898 8,412 51% RENTAL/LEASE 842,630 246,017 350,162 492,468 42% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 15,120 3,717 2,907 12,213 19% MISCELLANEOUS 46,350 16,418 21,083 25,267 45% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 10,550 5,274 8,078 2,473 77% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 11,000 9,694 1,306 88% $ 10,527,420 $ 3,832,659 $ 4,002,270 $ 6,525,150 38% COMMUNITY S ERVICES /EC ON DEV. SALARIES $ 230,850 $ 94,132 $ 96,295 $ 134,555 42% BENEFITS 69,230 28,678 29,511 39,719 43% SUPPLIES 7,000 195 7,030 (30) 100% SMALL EQUIPMENT 800 125 - 800 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 238,400 58,410 74,260 164,140 31% COMMUNICATIONS 1,490 387 495 995 33% TRAVEL 2,000 - 529 1,472 26% RENTAL/LEASE 10,960 840 4,039 6,921 37% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 7,000 1,004 1,546 5,454 22% $ 568,230 $ 183,771 $ 213,705 $ 354,525 38% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING SALARIES $ 1,547,970 $ 595,355 $ 598,380 $ 949,590 39% OVERTIME 1,300 6,052 4,474 (3,174) 344% BENEFITS 568,060 216,814 217,200 350,860 38% UNIFORMS 500 - - 500 0% SUPPLIES 16,100 5,231 5,503 10,597 34% SMALL EQUIPMENT 6,000 2,697 3,898 2,102 65% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 694,567 123,425 166,735 527,832 24% COMMUNICATIONS 8,700 1,985 3,398 5,302 39% TRAVEL 4,750 3,828 1,824 2,926 38% RENTAL/LEASE 147,580 8,674 62,873 84,707 43% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 6,800 1,177 - 6,800 0% MISCELLANEOUS 54,060 20,217 11,821 42,239 22% $ 3,056,387 $ 985,455 $ 1,076,107 $ 1,980,280 35% ENGINEERING SALARIES $ 1,462,570 $ 515,293 $ 596,793 $ 865,777 41% OVERTIME 5,000 2,667 104 4,896 2% BENEFITS 572,030 207,503 242,527 329,503 42% UNIFORMS 360 - - 360 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,930 1,143 1,906 2,024 48% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 231,080 171,617 11,588 219,492 5% COMMUNICATIONS 14,700 3,582 5,272 9,428 36% TRAVEL 600 216 - 600 0% RENTAL/LEASE 93,250 9,938 37,823 55,427 41% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 2,600 - - 2,600 0% MISCELLANEOUS 23,000 11,002 7,414 15,586 32% $ 2,409,120 $ 922,959 $ 903,426 $ 1,505,694 38% 15 Packet Pg. 57 I 6.4.a I Page 4 of 4 CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2017 Amended 5/31/2016 5/31/2017 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining °/, Spent PARKS & RECREATION SALARIES $ 1,958,290 $ 710,329 $ 745,096 $ 1,213,194 38% OVERTIME 10,000 3,984 6,404 3,596 64% BENEFITS 724,810 271,862 298,504 426,306 41% UNIFORMS 5,800 2,391 1,529 4,271 26% SUPPLIES 117,390 51,185 47,648 69,742 41% SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,250 6,645 10,098 (6,848) 311% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 556,240 79,276 75,474 480,766 14% COMMUNICATIONS 29,920 9,062 9,621 20,299 32% TRAVEL 4,470 53 3,400 1,070 76% RENTAL/LEASE 283,560 78,463 112,918 170,642 40% PUBLIC UTILITY 175,000 58,610 54,894 120,106 31% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 37,700 25,694 19,792 17,908 52% MISCELLANEOUS 92,610 30,558 32,062 60,548 35% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 47,000 - - 47,000 0% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 70,700 5,000 70,700 0% $ 4,116,740 $ 1,333,112 S 1,417,439 $ 2,699,301 34% PUBLIC WORKS SALARIES $ 270,330 $ 109,082 $ 115,277 $ 155,053 43% OVERTIME 200 - - 200 0% BENEFITS 83,880 34,545 36,246 47,634 43% SUPPLIES 9,600 825 1,543 8,057 16% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 - - 1,000 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 31 40 160 20% COMMUNICATIONS 1,350 248 285 1,065 21% TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 93,990 2,560 38,543 55,447 41% PUBLIC UTILITY 2,800 1,119 1,218 1,582 43% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,000 - - 1,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 5,900 60 5,840 1% $ 470,750 $ 148,411 S 193,212 $ 277,538 41% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES 695,650 267,122 289,859 405,791 42% OVERTIME 7,500 3,452 2,498 5,002 33% BENEFITS 295,620 108,157 123,698 171,922 42% UNIFORMS 3,000 1,334 3,081 (81) 103% SUPPLIES 102,829 27,558 30,254 72,575 29% SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,000 197 417 2,583 14% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18,246 76 13,195 5,051 72% COMMUNICATIONS 16,000 5,810 6,916 9,084 43% TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 64,360 22,542 24,733 39,627 38% PUBLIC UTILITY 280,000 117,346 132,449 147,551 47% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 84,500 37,407 43,162 41,338 51% MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 4,675 2,516 2,484 50% BUILDINGS 18,323 18,323 0% $ 1,595,028 $ 595,677 $ 672,777 $ 922,251 42% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 40,069,055 $ 16,509,045 S 15,723,883 S 24,345,172 39% 16 Packet Pg. 58 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2017 General Fund Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 1,842,486 $ 1,842,486 $ 2,222,449 20.62% February 4,475,711 2,633,225 4,590,134 2.56% March 6,692,908 2,217,197 7,111,840 6.26% April 10,325,016 3,632,108 10,413,847 0.86% May 17,601,140 7,276,124 18,087,809 2.76% June 19,548,720 1,947,581 July 21,505,534 1,956,814 August 23,701,818 2,196,284 September 25,619,471 1,917,652 October 28,368,775 2,749,305 November 35,742,399 7,373,624 December 37,753,480 2,011,081 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2017 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 207,208 $ 207,208 $ 214,967 3.74% February 377,258 170,050 425,156 12.70% March 561,933 184,674 517,163 -7.97% April 738,924 176,991 759,746 2.82% May 921,191 182,267 1,057,416 14.79% June 1,156,829 235,638 July 1,491,329 334,500 August 1,747,148 255,819 September 1,998,654 251,505 October 2,216,068 217,414 November 2,456,999 240,931 December 2,600,000 143,001 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 17 Packet Pg. 59 1 I 6.4.a I Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: May 2017 Year -to -Date Total $2,970,761 Construction Trade, Accommodation, $464,287 $12,793 Clothing and Accessories, $99,708 Communications, $88,915 Automotive Repair, Health & Personal $72,446 Amusement & Care, $100.116 Recreation, $36,299 Business Services, $241,417 Gasoline, $14,118 Retail Food Stores, $113,137 Wholesale Trade,—/ - I $139,919 / Misc Retail, J $391,417 Others, $15,737 Total Retail Automotive Construction Trade Wholesale Trade Eating & Drinking Misc Retail Health & Personal Care Business Services Amusement & Recreation Clothing and Accessories Gasoline Retail Food Stores Automotive Repair Others Accommodation Manufacturing Communications I Manufacturing, Eating & Drinking, $41,617 $361,987 Change in Sales Tax Revenue: May 2017 compared to May 2016 ($30,000) $20,000 $70,000 Retail Automotive, $776,849 $120,000 $170,000 $220,000 18 Packet Pg. 60 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2017 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs % January $ 528,142 $ 528,142 $ 554,719 5.03% February 1,179,855 651,712 1,307,546 10.82% March 1,679,874 500,020 1,829,850 8.93% April 2,159,477 479,603 2,327,446 7.78% May 2,755,486 596,009 2,970,761 7.81% June 3,293,571 538,085 July 3,847,001 553,430 August 4,458,173 611,171 September 5,050,960 592,787 October 5,666,829 615,869 November 6,303,607 636,779 December 6,875,000 571,393 Gas Utility Tax Sales and Use Tax 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +Current Year -Budget -*-- Prior Year City ofEdmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2017 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 86,887 $ 86,887 $ 93,550 7.67% February 183,529 96,642 203,652 10.96% March 260,361 76,832 294,027 12.93% April 328,823 68,462 372,490 13.28% May 381,147 52,324 429,203 12.61% June 416,950 35,802 July 446,516 29,566 August 469,952 23,437 September 491,313 21,360 October 515,645 24,332 November 552,451 36,806 December 608,000 55,549 Gas Utility Tax 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,00011 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +Current Year -Budget -*-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 19 O iL O cv U C M C LL t r C O O O N N N I Packet Pg. 61 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2017 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 114,426 $ 114,426 $ 105,424 -7.87% February 223,803 109,377 199,068 -11.05% March 330,274 106,471 290,145 -12.15% April 436,772 106,497 403,189 -7.69% May 549,330 112,558 492,059 -10.43% June 651,204 101,874 July 754,077 102,873 August 855,646 101,570 September 961,054 105,407 October 1,062,454 101,400 November 1,159,179 96,725 December 1,263,200 104,021 Electric Utility Tax Telephone Utility Tax 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -4- Current Year -Budget -*-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2017 Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 171,830 $ 171,830 $ 175,773 2.29% February 347,448 175,618 382,822 10.18% March 515,770 168,322 549,954 6.63% April 678,100 162,330 729,784 7.62% May 824,207 146,107 863,230 4.73% June 937,922 113,715 July 1,049,475 111,553 August 1,155,197 105,722 September 1,260,458 105,261 October 1,368,262 107,804 November 1,486,788 118,526 December 1,604,000 117,212 Electric Utility Tax 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC +Current Year -Budget -*--PriorYear *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 20 Packet Pg. 62 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2017 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 573,159 $ 573,159 $ 599,648 4.62% February 966,145 392,986 1,027,975 6.40% March 1,529,375 563,229 1,658,808 8.46% April 1,906,725 377,350 2,057,951 7.93% May 2,464,794 558,070 2,660,519 7.94% June 2,900,426 435,631 July 3,585,922 685,496 August 4,167,341 581,419 September 4,962,652 795,311 October 5,517,073 554,421 November 6,167,530 650,457 December 6,572,750 405,220 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2017 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 245,291 $ 245,291 $ 261,646 2.29% February 773,850 528,559 828,655 10.18% March 1,018,952 245,102 1,089,708 6.63% April 1,236,230 217,279 1,322,203 7.62% May 1,481,659 245,428 1,583,130 4.73% June 1,699,683 218,024 July 1,946,434 246,751 August 2,474,151 527,717 September 2,718,865 244,714 October 2,936,691 217,826 November 3,181,934 245,242 December 3,400,000 218,066 Storm Water Sales 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC +CurrerrtYear -Budget -*-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 21 Packet Pg. 63 1 t 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2017 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs January $ 572,309 $ 572,309 $ 623,336 8.92% February 1,034,805 462,496 1,135,356 9.72% March 1,603,135 568,330 1,767,521 10.25% April 2,067,863 464,728 2,277,537 10.14% May 2,638,929 571,065 2,905,981 10.12% June 3,109,116 470,187 July 3,696,739 587,623 August 4,167,756 471,017 September 4,763,468 595,712 October 5,237,994 474,526 November 5,818,870 580,876 December 6,291,410 472,540 Unmeter Sewer Sales 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O IZ O O C M C M 21 t r C O 2 M 2 O N N N 22 Packet Pg. 64 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2017 General Fund Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 4,409,595 $ 4,409,595 $ 4,856,792 10.14% February 7,042,288 2,632,692 7,118,110 1.08% March 10,151,670 3,109,383 11,124,815 9.59% April 14,001,703 3,850,033 13,496,549 -3.61% May 16,128,455 2,126,752 15,723,883 -2.51% June 19,812,535 3,684,080 July 22,947,235 3,134,700 August 26,870,574 3,923,339 September 29,983,441 3,112,867 October 32,535,825 2,552,384 November 36,144,968 3,609,144 December 40,069,055 3,924,087 City ofEdmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2017 Non -Departmental Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs % January $ 2,146,531 $ 2,146,531 $ 2,867,736 33.60% February 2,697,696 551,165 2,992,431 10.93% March 3,672,424 974,728 4,967,917 35.28% April 5,229,897 1,557,473 5,263,262 0.64% May 5,372,743 142,846 5,385,911 0.25% June 6,788,429 1,415,687 July 7,638,067 849,638 August 9,076,194 1,438,127 September 9,979,289 903,095 October 10,369,720 390,431 November 11,451,431 1,081,711 December 12,713,920 1,262,489 Non -Departmental 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC tCurrent Year -Budget ---Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 23 Packet Pg. 65 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2017 City Council Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 24,382 $ 24,382 $ 22,742 -6.73% February 52,318 27,936 44,954 -14.07% March 83,798 31,480 70,026 -16.43% April 111,661 27,864 93,544 -16.23% May 142,110 30,449 118,441 -16.66% June 179,407 37,297 July 211,248 31,841 August 243,636 32,388 September 280,710 37,075 October 307,316 26,606 November 340,142 32,826 December 376,120 35,978 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2017 Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 23,100 $ 23,100 $ 22,135 -4.18% February 46,663 23,563 46,116 -1.17% March 69,540 22,877 68,939 -0.87% April 92,124 22,584 91,090 -1.12% May 114,857 22,733 113,581 -1.11% June 137,580 22,723 July 160,958 23,378 August 184,229 23,271 September 207,064 22,834 October 230,074 23,010 November 252,731 22,657 December 276,700 23,969 Office of Mayor 300,000.00 250,000.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC +Current Year -Budget-4-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 24 O CL O C M C_ LL t r C O M O N N N Packet Pg. 66 1 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2017 Human Resources Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 33,336 $ 33,336 $ 35,109 5.32% February 71,046 37,709 63,054 -11.25% March 115,092 44,047 93,670 -18.61% April 148,861 33,769 122,632 -17.62% May 188,582 39,721 152,171 -19.31% June 226,982 38,400 July 266,054 39,073 August 302,670 36,616 September 336,201 33,531 October 375,053 38,852 November 408,108 33,055 December 456,490 48,382 Human Resources 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 - 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +Current Year -Budget -*-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2017 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs % January $ 74,527 $ 74,527 $ 76,438 2.56% February 157,040 82,513 170,699 8.70% March 242,535 85,495 249,970 3.07% April 321,521 78,987 330,859 2.90% May 402,116 80,595 407,638 1.37% June 482,636 80,519 July 564,050 81,414 August 649,652 85,602 September 733,470 83,818 October 821,328 87,857 November 906,841 85,513 December 994,140 87,299 Municipal Court 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 - 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 jr 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC Current Year -Budget -dr,- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 25 Packet Pg. 67 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2017 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 31,803 $ 31,803 $ 41,399 30.17% February 74,567 42,764 82,958 11.25% March 117,487 42,920 124,227 5.74% April 176,878 59,391 168,847 -4.54% May 217,526 40,649 213,705 -1.76% June 259,704 42,178 July 305,867 46,163 August 354,338 48,470 September 402,092 47,754 October 449,860 47,768 November 502,009 52,150 December 568,230 66,221 City Clerk Community Services/Economic Development 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC +Current Year -Budget -0-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk 2017 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 53,698 $ 53,698 $ 63,151 17.60% February 104,118 50,421 115,829 11.25% March 156,948 52,830 165,932 5.72% April 206,989 50,041 232,085 12.12% May 256,099 49,110 282,468 10.30% June 307,065 50,966 July 358,855 51,790 August 412,651 53,796 September 465,765 53,115 October 529,589 63,824 November 585,495 55,906 December 639,670 54,175 City Clerk 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year -Budget -0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 26 Packet Pg. 68 1 I 6.4.a I City gf'Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund 2017 Technology Rental Fund Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 89,050 $ 89,050 $ 68,612 -22.95% February 177,771 88,721 177,236 -0.30% March 237,540 59,769 225,779 -4.95% April 291,722 54,182 277,784 -4.78% May 338,118 46,396 327,297 -3.20% June 387,726 49,608 July 453,064 65,338 August 528,249 75,186 September 598,969 70,720 October 660,256 61,287 November 738,213 77,957 December 890,430 152,217 Finance Technology Rental Fund 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 - 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year - Budget -&- Prior Year Prior Year amounts are from the Information Services Budget City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Finance 2017 Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 102,207 $ 102,207 $ 122,581 19.93% February 189,948 87,740 199,380 4.97% March 271,844 81,896 281,459 3.54% April 361,256 89,412 364,229 0.82% May 442,527 81,271 453,448 2.47% June 522,997 80,470 July 603,839 80,842 August 687,233 83,394 September 781,183 93,949 October 871,230 90,048 November 956,025 84,794 December 1,049,560 93,535 Finance 1,100,000 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC + Current Year - Budget -4-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O O. O ra C M a M 21 t r C O 2 M 2 0 N N N 27 Packet Pg. 69 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2017 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 68,232 $ 68,232 $ 44,346 -35.01% February 136,463 68,232 133,495 -2.18% March 204,695 68,232 199,483 -2.55% April 272,927 68,232 265,386 -2.76% May 341,158 68,232 331,290 -2.89% June 409,390 68,232 July 477,621 68,232 August 545,853 68,232 September 614,085 68,232 October 682,316 68,232 November 750,548 68,232 December 818,780 68,232 Police City Attorney 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +Current Year - Budget -4-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2017 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 829,943 $ 829,943 $ 780,892 -5.91% February 1,662,470 832,528 1,625,589 -2.22% March 2,505,809 843,339 2,399,391 -4.25% April 3,339,581 833,772 3,219,838 -3.59% May 4,168,368 828,787 4,002,270 -3.98% June 5,053,459 885,092 July 5,891,147 837,688 August 6,741,701 850,554 September 7,584,219 842,517 October 8,462,646 878,427 November 9,638,182 1,175,536 December 10,527,420 889,238 Police 11,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year -Budget -dr-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O O. O ra C M C ILL 21 t r C O 2 M 2 O N N N 28 Packet Pg. 70 ■ 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services 2017 Development Services Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs January $ 230,681 $ 230,681 $ 177,820 -22.92% February 471,547 240,866 416,189 -11.74% March 736,403 264,856 613,958 -16.63% April 972,117 235,714 831,603 -14.45% May 1,226,401 254,284 1,076,107 -12.25% June 1,468,275 241,874 July 1,721,583 253,308 August 1,989,604 268,020 September 2,242,988 253,384 October 2,519,625 276,636 November 2,770,925 251,300 December 3,056,387 285,462 Parks & Recreation Development Services 3,000,000 2,750,000 2,500,000 2,250,000 2,000,000 eff 1,750,000 1,500,000 1,250,000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 250,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC +Current Year - Budget -0-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2017 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs January $ 274,212 $ 274,212 $ 260,128 -5.14% February 559,410 285,198 525,411 -6.08% March 859,833 300,423 828,782 -3.61% April 1,163,949 304,116 1,110,332 -4.61% May 1,496,601 332,653 1,417,439 -5.29% June 1,827,076 330,474 July 2,294,141 467,065 August 2,797,570 503,430 September 3,153,190 355,619 October 3,474,134 320,944 November 3,754,468 280,335 December 4,116,740 362,272 Parks & Recreation 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCF NOV DEC t Current Year - Budget ->~ Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 29 Packet Pg. 71 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works 2017 Public Works Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 38,606 $ 38,606 $ 37,599 -2.61% February 77,835 39,229 79,084 1.61% March 117,100 39,265 117,357 0.22% April 156,588 39,488 155,173 -0.90% May 196,390 39,802 193,212 -1.62% June 235,491 39,101 July 275,204 39,712 August 314,352 39,148 September 352,464 38,113 October 393,232 40,768 November 429,298 36,066 December 470,750 41,452 Facilities Maintenance Public Works 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC t Current Year -Budget -&-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2017 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 127,054 $ 127,054 $ 128,273 0.96% February 257,275 130,221 264,009 2.62% March 393,296 136,021 404,318 2.80% April 523,097 129,801 528,660 1.06 May 653,776 130,679 672,777 2.91% June 769,798 116,022 July 920,705 150,908 August 1,041,207 120,502 September 1,179,252 138,045 October 1,302,136 122,884 November 1,442,204 140,068 December 1,595,028 152,824 Facilities Maintenance 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year - Budget ->~ Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. O CL O cv C M C LL 21 t r C O 2 O 2 O N N N 30 Packet Pg. 72 I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2017 Engineering Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast ActuaIs January $ 186,081 $ 186,081 $ 176,444 -5.18% February 368,560 182,479 358,913 -2.62% March 568,196 199,636 539,386 -5.07% April 770,455 202,259 719,010 -6.68% May 962,858 192,403 903,426 -6.17% June 1,167,015 204,157 July 1,360,802 193,788 August 1,570,747 209,945 September 1,772,816 202,069 October 1,985,415 212,599 November 2,181,969 196,554 December 2,409,120 227,151 Engineering 2,500,000 2,250,000 2,000,000 1,750,000 1,500,000 1,250,000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 250,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCr NOV DEC +Current Year - Budget t Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 31 Packet Pg. 73 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY I 6.4.a I City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail As of May 31, 2017 Years Agency/ Investment Purchase to Par Market Issuer Tvge Price Maturitv Value Value FICO Bonds $ 1,000,650 FHLMC Bonds 1,000,000 FFCB Bonds 995,820 FFCB Bonds 2,010,790 FFCB Bonds 2,000,000 FHLMC Bonds 995,970 FNMA Bonds 1,994,310 FNMA Bonds 997,300 FHLB Bonds 2,003,780 FNMA Bonds 2,000,000 FHLMC Bonds 2,003,868 FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 FHLB Bonds 3,000,000 RFCS Bonds 1,999,698 FHLB Bonds 2,000,000 FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 FHLMC Bonds 999,500 FNMA Bonds 2,005,474 FHLMC Bonds 999,400 TOTAL SECURITIES 32,006,561 Washington State Local Gott Investment Pool Snohomish County Local Godt Investment Pool TOTAL PORTFOLIO 0.02 $ 1,027,000 $ 1,026,826 0.58 1,000,000 999,040 1.13 1,000,000 994,769 1.58 2,000,000 1,996,572 1.65 2,000,000 1,994,902 2.34 1,000,000 996,361 2.41 2,000,000 1,992,622 2.83 1,000,000 994,278 2.83 2,000,000 1,985,566 2.83 2,000,000 1,998,186 2.91 2,000,000 1,980,390 3.08 1,000,000 982,634 3.08 1,000,000 982,634 3.12 3,000,000 2,958,639 3.13 2,120,000 2,012,302 3.17 2,000,000 2,001,620 3.25 1,000,000 999,859 3.25 1,000,000 999,859 3.59 1,000,000 999,329 3.64 2,000,000 1,947,700 4.59 1,000,000 999,594 2.6 32,147,000 31,843,682 9,954,973 9,954,973 16,719,418 16,719,418 $ 58,821,390 $ 58,518,072 Issuer Diversification __— FICO, 3% / RFCS, 7% FNMA, 34% FHLMC, 19% FFCB,16% FHLB, 22% Maturity Date 06/06/17 12/28/17 07/18/18 12/28/18 01 /25/19 10/02/19 10/28/19 03/30/20 03/30/20 03/30/20 04/28/20 06/30/20 06/30/20 07/13/20 07/15/20 07/30/20 08/28/20 08/28/20 12/30/20 01 /19/21 12/30/21 Demand Demand Coupon Rate 0.96% 0.90% 0.75% 1.42% 1.23% 1.25% 1.35% 1.38% 1.45% 1.65% 1.35% 1.38% 1.38% 1.20% 1.60% 1.75% 1.40% 1.40% 1.75% 1.50% 2.00% 0.87% 1.02% Cash and Investment Balances (in$ Millions) Checking, $7.6 State LGIP, $10.0 County LGIP, $16.7 32 Packet Pg. 74 1 I 6.4.a I INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Annual Interest Income $500,000 $423, 816 $400,000 $335,926 $300,000 $224, 012 $200,000 $163, 214 $100,000 557,334 $74,830 $- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Edmonds Rate of Return Compared to Benchmark (Rolling 12 months) 6 Month Treasury Rate (Benchmark) City Blended Rate Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May Maturity Distribution and Rate of Return $12,000,000 2.50% $10,000,000 2.00% $8,000,000 1.50% $6,000,000 1.00% $4,000,000 $- - 0.00% 0-6 Mo 6-12 Mo 12-18 Mo 18-24 Mo 24-30 Mo 30-36 Mo 36-42 Mo 42-48 Mo 48-54 Mo 54-60 Mo 0 a m U c 0 c ii z c 0 0 0 N N rl 33 Packet Pg. 75 6.4.a GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND FUND BALANCES & SUBFUNDS ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31/2016 3/31/2017 5/31/2017 Q1 YTD 001-General Fund $ 9,841,719 $ 5,828,744 $ 12,205,644 $ (4,012,975) $ 2,363,925 a 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 540,255 454,233 406,542 (86,022) (133,713; 011-Risk Management Fund 963,025 886,927 889,028 (76,098) (73,997; 012-Contingency Reserve Fund 5,367,841 5,379,266 5,384,886 11,425 17,045 c 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 7,646 7,683 7,701 37 55 ii 016-Building Maintenance 98,436 252,144 193,298 153,708 94,862 21 t Total General Fund & Subfunds $ 16,818,922 $ 12,808,996 $ 19,087,098 $ (4,009,925) $ 2,268,177 0 0 N N N O N General Fund & Subfunds 20 $19.09 c $16.82 E ii 16 �+ $12.81 12 m c o O m 8 � c 4 c� _ Dec 2016 March 2017 May 2017 r E t .r r a *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2016 Financial Statements. 34 Packet Pg. 76 6.4.a GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW CHANGE IN FUND FUND BALANCES BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS 12/31/2016 3/31/2017 5/31/2017 Q1 YTD General Fund & Subfunds $ 16,818,922 $ 12,808,997 $ 19,087,099 $ (4,009,925) $ 2,268,17 Special Revenue 8,664,438 9,195,889 8,896,035 531,451 231,59 Debt Service 20,262 20,262 60,408 - 40,14 0 C Total Governmental Funds $ 25,503,622 $ 22,025,147 $ 28,043,541 $ (3,478,474) $ 2,539,91 IX c� .v c c ii 21 t c Governmental Fund Balances -By Fund Group Governmental Fund 2 Balances- Combined >, 0 20 30 — $19.09 c cm $25.50 $16.82 0CL 16 General 24 22.03 CD Fund & IX Subfunds $12.81 c c 18 c 012 t Special _ ILL — Revenue L, $8.90 8 12 — a� Debt Service m 4 6 — c 0 0 - $0.02 $0.02 $0.06 Dec 2016 March 2017 May 2017 Dec 2016 March 2017 May 2017 m E z v Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2016 Financial Statements. 35 Packet Pg. 77 6.4.a SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- SPECIAL REVENUE 12/31/2016 3/31/2017 5/31/2017 Q1 YrD 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund $ 34,632 $ 45,657 $ 45,092 $ 11,025 $ 10,461 111 - Street Fund 790,429 752,425 736,759 (38,004) (53,670) 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 91,960 316,710 (315,704) 224,751 (407,664) 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 493,080 500,685 494,634 7,605 1,554 118 - Memorial Street Tree 18,101 18,188 18,230 87 129 a 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 94,468 104,017 89,571 9,550 (4,897) wo 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 63,704 73,600 74,834 9,896 11,130 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 14,931 14,788 14,996 (143) 65 c 123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 84,371 86,772 86,734 2,401 2,362 125 - Real Estate Tax 2 2,259,949 2,192, 767 2,361,001 (67,181) 101,052 u_ 21 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 1,977,485 2,247,796 2,521,013 270,311 543,528 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 263,544 287,029 289,068 23,485 25,524 p 129 - Special Projects Fund 38,782 38,968 39,060 186 277 130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 142,339 162,058 161,521 19,719 19,182 132 - Parks Construction Fund 1,185,145 1,196,669 1,110,613 11,524 (74,532) .. 136 - Parks Trust Fund 153,793 154,530 154,893 737 1,100 c N 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 901,172 912,496 917,360 11,324 16,188 v 138 - Sister City Commission 6,416 8,176 8,808 1,761 2,393 t 140 - Business Improvement Disrict 50,137 82,556 87,552 32,419 37,415 Q. Total Special Revenue $ 8,664,438 $ 9,195,889 $ 8,896,035 $ 531,451 $ 231,596 W 2 - - - U c Special Revenue Funds 15 ii 12 r m a� $8.66 $9.20 $8.90 pap o ■ Special t 6 Revenue c 3 � c� - r c m Dec 2016 March 2017 May 2017 .r r a *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2016 Financial Statements. 36 Packet Pg. 78 6.4.a ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS 12/31/2016 3/31/2017 5/31/2017 Q1 YTD 421 - Water Utility Fund $ 17,869,638 $ 18,428,595 $ 18,729,051 $ 558,958 $ 859,413 422 - Storm Utility Fund 10,246,573 10,707,276 10,675,676 460,703 429,104 0 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 42,695,396 43,337,637 43,510,296 642,241 814,900 m 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 843,960 843,961 843,963 1 3 2 411 - Combined Utility Operation - 42,151 68,484 42,151 68,484 u- c Total Enterprise Funds $ 71,655,566 $ 73,359,621 $ 73,827,470 $ 1,704,055 $ 2,171,904 c ii 21 t c 0 0 0 N Enterprise and Agency Fund Balances as of May 31, 2017 N 45,000,000 $43,510,296 1r O 40,000,000 d' 35,000,000 io 30,000,000 v O 25,000,000 LL $18 729 051 �+ 20,000,000 O r m 15,000,000 $10,675,676 O 10,000,000 m 5,000,000 $68,484 $843,963 $246,982 0 C Combined Utility Water Storm Sewer/WWTP Bond Reserve Firemen's Pension 2 Fund r c m E t O .r r a *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2016 Financial Statements. 37 Packet Pg. 79 SUMMARY OVERVIEW I 6.4.a I CITY-WIDE Governmental Funds Enterprise Funds Internal Services Fund Agency Funds Total City-wide Total FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- $ 25, 503, 622 $ 22, 025,147 $ 28, 043, 541 $ 71, 655, 566 73, 359, 621 73, 827,470 8,311,631 8,350,207 8,391,321 224,697 205,908 246,982 $ 105, 695, 516 $ 103, 940, 884 $ 110, 509, 315 $ CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- (3,478,474) $ 1,704,055 38,576 (18,789) (1,754,633) $ Governmental Fund Balances (Excluding General Fund) as of May 31, 2017 Drug Enforcement Fund Street Fund Combined Street Const/Improve Fund $(315,704) Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund Memorial Street Fund Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund Employee Parking Permit Fund Youth Scholarship Fund Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts Real Estate Excise Tax 2 Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq Gifts Catalog Fund Special Projects Fund Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement Parks Construction Fund Parks Trust Fund Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund Sister City Commission Business Improvement District L.I.D. Fund Control 2,539,919 2,171, 904 79,690 0 CL 22,285 4,813,798 c c ii 1 t c 0 $45, 092 $736, 759 $494,634 $18,230 $89, 571 $74, 834 $14,996 $86,734 $ ,361,001 $28 ,068 $2,521,013 $39,060 $161,5 $1,110,6 3 $154,89 917, 360 $8,808 $87, 552 $20, 262 $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2016 Financial Statements. a R 0 N N N 38 Packet Pg. 80 6.4.a INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND INTERNAL SERVICE BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS 12/31/2016 3/31/2017 5/31/2017 Q1 yTD 0 m 511 - Equipment Rental Fund $ 8,311,631 $ 8,303,230 $ 8,295,599 $ (8,401) $ (16,032) 512 - Technology Rental Fund - 46,978 95,722 46,978 95,722 U c Total Internal Service Funds $ 8,311,631 $ 8,350,207 $ 8,391,321 $ 38,576 $ 79,690 LL 21 t c O Internal Service Fund Balances o N N N 10,000,000 r- $8, 311, 631 $8, 303, 230 $8, 295, 599 O 8,000,000 U c 6,000,000 511- Equipment Rental Fund ii 512 - Technology Rental Fund 2 4,000,000 m a� � 3 m 2+ 2,000,000 C O $0 46,973 95, 722 _ ca Dec 2016 March 2017 May 2017 c m E t .r r a *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2016 Financial Statements. 39 Packet Pg. 81 6.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Authorize the Mayor to sign utility easements and temporary construction easements at 7521 212th St. SW and 7525 212th St. SW for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Katie MacCaul Background/History On July 11, 2017, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning, and Public works committee and it was forwarded to the July 18th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign the easement documents. Narrative As part of the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements project, the overhead utilities will be converted to underground within approximately 250' of each approach. On the northeast corner of the intersection, the City has reached an agreement with the property owner at 7521 212th St. SW and 7525 212th St. SW (same owner) for utility easements and temporary construction easements. The utility easements will provide the City with 197 square feet of easement at 7525 212th St. SW and 100 square feet at 7521 212th St. SW for the installation of the Joint Utility Trench (JUT). The JUT will hold PUD, Wave, Comcast, Frontier, and WSDOT / City underground utility lines. Based on the design plans, the JUT was going to be placed under the sidewalk in City right of way. However, an existing underground Frontier duct bank (not located during design phase) is located in the same alignment of the proposed JUT. The alignment of the JUT has been revised and will now be in the referenced utility easement area. In addition, 100 square feet of temporary construction easement is needed at 7521 212th St. SW and 281 square feet at 7525 212th St. SW to provide enough construction area to build the JUT. The total compensation provided to the property owner for the easements is $10,500 ($8,682.50 for utility easements and $1,714.50 for temporary construction easements). This cost will be funded by revenue from transportation impact fees. Attachments: Utility Easement 7521 212th 7525 Utility Easement Temporary Construction Easement 7521 212th 7525 Temporary Construction Easemenet Real Property Voucher Packet Pg. 82 6.5.a CITY OF EDMONDS DAVE EARUNG MAYOR • 121 5"" AVENUE NORTN - E0M*NDS.WA9=0 . 42&?11j.0220 PAX 426-8772-57$0 w*ms admondswa gov 9 ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Return Address: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 - 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Grantors- Strickland GC LLC and Porterfield Development LLC Grantee: City of Edmonds Abbreviated Legal- Section 19, 20, 29, & 30 T27N, R4E, W.M. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 00566900400704 UTILITY EASEMENT Property Address: 7521 2121h St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantor(s) herein,- the undersigned, Porterfield Development LLC and Strickland GC LLC, hereby grant(s) to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of a Joint Utility Trench along 212" St. SW with PUD, Frontier, Comcast, Wave, and City / WSDOT underground lines and necessary appurtenances, over, across, through, and below the following described property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions thereon interfering with the location, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of said Joint Utility Trench and necessary appurtenances, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement hereby granted is located in the COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATF, OF WASHINGTON, and is more particularly described as the following property: a The Legal Description is included in Exhibit A. 0 The Easement Area is depicted in the drawing attached as Exhibit B. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed during the constniction, maintenance, and repair of said utility or utilities, provided the grantor(s), their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, upon, or within the permanent easement. Packet Pg. 83 1 6.5.a STATE OF IDIRS") CCRTINIWes) O this jav personally appeared. bet o fit- c a d GC LLC to rate knom to3 be the isaa Pict (}des+ albe i s ad hci x i wWn and fmWing jasupmost sy acfrarc % €l that they signed she os their fiw and WaRtar aot grA deed, fr the uses ad purpoae+z.xatis to be the with for. ' e i. t o ad` t %� si��se same as � free . l.�r act aad deed. r3t€e cases and - lamposes theWm OF S DAY CW LIP!. 20 '14 A. Ac �.T r', N c d E d N m w N d V d O L a m 0 Q. E c 0 a� L s .r N T N t co ti w N N PIC N T- N N LO ti C d N m w c d E z v m Q -704 4'� 4 Packet Pg. 84 PARENT) %RCEL. PAP,CEL.AL- THE-910UM 9Z9Z-FEETOF'THE,-NMTH,-761,92 FEET OFIOT71 PARCEL 0, THE EA,,ST2Q'Fl;r-.T OF WT'7, EWE" ThE ji� 0XT-h-26L92.FEFllliEREo.F.- PARCELC: TRBSGUTHVSZFEET-OFTMEI� 261.92,1W ��WTHE EAST WYFEET-OPLOT k. ALL. IN EILOCK.4 , SEATTLE kMMTS DLVJSION NOA, ACMRDINQ TUTHEPLAT THEREQF,. Ricopxiw 54. vOLUM99 OF-1!1^ Pk o 1.1, RECORDS ON§I;��(�6 WASWWTOM WA&iMTOM A. POknON OF THE ARGVE DESCRIB M3 P:4RBNT -I>ARCEL MO R I ZPA . RTICULARL I Y DF4MISMA-S. FOIAA)WS-, TIE'sof MI PIMPEET OF -THE AEOVE DESCMED PA99NT- PARCIELi WNTAINM 100SQUAIMPE-M.INIORE: OR LESS, SUUA'FE INTHE CITY OF MMOND& ZZIMMEJ COUNTYWASM W-M, :SM ATTACHED E-XMBrr wW Packet Pg. 85 .................. T—, PARCEL # 00566900400704 INVERTED NAII tN 4"X4" CONC MON IN WATER VALVE CASE, FW� 27+48.96 CONCRETE R.O.W. MON IM TH BRASS RIVET IN CASE 4 o R.O.W. 29 7- LEGEND 2D UTILITY EASEMENT AREA. 100 S,F. ---- EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY &t 06/21/17 1!00pm - EXHIBIT B 1FAVID eVAN8 76TH AND 212TH. ST SW 6-21-17 gcxk. UTILITY EASEMENT CAR WASH m 04 45 T- cm T- cm Lo 1- E w U) m UJI E m 0 m Packet Pg. 86 6.5.b CITY OF EDMONDS DAVE EARLING u f MAYOR 121 5T" AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-672-5750 Websile: www.edmondswa.gov rsga Lqqu PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Return Address: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 - 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Grantor(s): Strickland GC LLC & Porterfield Development LLC Grantee: City of Edmonds Abbreviated Legal: Section 19, 20, 29, & 30 T27N, R4E, W.M. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 00566900400703 UTILITY EASEMENT Property Address: 7525 212th St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantor(s) herein, the undersigned, Strickland GC LLC and Porterfield Development LLC, hereby grant(s) to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of a Joint Utility Trench along 212`h St. SW with PUD, Frontier, Comcast, Wave, and City / WSDOT underground lines and necessary appurtenances, over, across, through, and below the following described property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions thereon interfering with the location, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of said Joint Utility Trench along 212th St. SW and necessary appurtenances, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement hereby granted is located in the COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, and is more particularly described as the following property: The Legal Description is included in Exhibit A. The Easement Area is depicted in the drawing attached as Exhibit B. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance, and repair of said utility or utilities, provided the grantor(s), their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, upon, or within the permanent easement. Packet Pg. 87 6.5.b DATED THIS DAY OF 20 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss COUNTY OF WASCO) Strickland GC LLC On this day personally appeared before me Strickland GC LLC to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS.— DAY OF , 20. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Oregon, residing at Porterfield Development LLC STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING) On this day personally appeared before me Porterfield Development LLC to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS _ DAY OF , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Packet Pg. 88 6.5.b EXHIBIT A UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL NO.00566900400703 PARENT PARCEL: THE EAST 84.36 FEET OF LOT 7, BLOCK 4, SEATTLE HEIGHTS DIVISION NOA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 11, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 261.92 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. UTILITY EASEMENT: A PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARENT PARCEL MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MONUMENTED CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 19, 20, 29, AND 30, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. THENCE SOUTH 88004'36" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29 AND THE CENTERLINE OF 212TH STREET SOUTHWEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 163.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1055'24" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.80 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID 212TH STREET SOUTHWEST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 79045'54" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88004'36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN FOR A DISTANCE OF 15.44 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARENT PARCEL; THENCE NORTH 0037'02" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88004'36" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79045'54" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 8.48 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88050'53" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.67 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 197 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Packet Pg. 89 6.5.b EXHIBIT B TPpB I UTILITY ESMT. CAR WASH 1 PARCEL # FOUND 3 00566900400703 CONCRETE M ON WITH R. O' W. L6 L5 BRASS L7 nl RIVET IN CASE 4 R.O.W. ~ L,J—_ 212TH ST SW . 0. W. 9 0 S88'04'36"E 163.61' J I ?L�r� 3 R.O. W. 30 29 Q ��- 0 S88'04'36"E 2748.96 ~— 'll J R.O.W. I lI I 0 30 so LEGEND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA. 197 S.F. ---- EXISTING RIGHT—OF—WAY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY gja 06/21/17 12:12pm — D:\ACAD—Home\COED00000004\svEM09coed0004—Car Wash—Ut—Esmt.dwg EXHIBIT B 76TH AND 212TH ST SW DAIC• 6-21—F7 xsx glo "OASSOCIIATli'NO- UTILITY EASEMENT RE COED0004 /svEM09cosd0004 DRAW 9lc I INVERTED NAIL IN 4"X4" CONC MON IN _ WATER VALVE L CASE. 27+48.96 LINE TABLE LINE NO. BEARING LENGTH L1 N01'55'24"E 35.80' L2 S79'45'54"E 40.12' L3 S88'04'36"E 15.44' L4 N00'37'02"E 5.00' L5 N88'04'36"W 14.96' L6 N79'45'54"W 8.48' L7 N88'50'53"W 31.67' 1620 W Medne Mew Drive, suite 2D0 Everett W..hi.gtee 99201 F' Wr. 4n.MAM CAR WASH a Packet Pg. 90 6.5.c c m E y� C3 Y of 1;' (nonds y TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AIENT W to ai 7e"' 01 212ei Irdemectlon Improvements Pro'ect :r D r U d 0 Property. Address 7521212'h St. SW Edmonds, AU 9MI6 L tL to ,assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 00566900400704 c m E Property Own"): Porterfield Development LLC and Strickland GC LLC am 0 L The undersigned property owners, for themselves and for their heirs, successors and assigns, hereafter 0- E together referred to as " ORA1NTOR(S)", for acid in consideration of the prom ises set fbr&below and the a improvements to the City's 760' a 212`s Intersection Iml2roventents EMjem (hereafter "'project•) hereby o convey and grant to the City of Edmonds, a Municipal Corporation, and its successors and assigns, hereafter avi together referred to as "the City", a temporary, non-exclusive easement (die "Temporary Construction Easement") over, under, in, along, .across and upon the GRANTOR(S).' property P'lega)ly described on Exhibit A and depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the `Temporary t Easement Area"), for the purpose of Project work_ The GRANTORS) further grant the use of the prnperiy 04 adjacent to the Temporary Easement Area for'the purpDn of performing utility work as generally•depicted on N Exhibit B, attached hereto. Work will include -the installation of a temporary PUD pole and guy wire to hold a 06 recently installed PUD pole. All costs ofthit work shall be completely borne by dwiCity. ti The GRrtNTOR(S) and the City, by accepting and signing this document, migually covenant and agree as follows: 00 tV N The City shall, upon, completion of the work, remove all construatioa.d�bris and restore the surface.. of the above -described property to substantially its original condition, except as modified by the r subject Project. N 2. This. Temporary Construction Easement $hall commence upon the date this Agreement is signed by N both parties and shall terminate and expire upon substantial completion of the project. LO ti 3. Upon the expiration of the term of this Temporary Construction Easement, all of the rights and benefits of the City in, to and :ender this A reemem with g respect fa the Temporary Construction m E Easement shall automatically terminate and be of np;further force and effect. to r W DATED this _ _ I'� �� clay of 2017. - o r U L N O U cu L • 0 rZ E L r r Q> E U r a -70 `F �b Packet Pg. 91 6.5.c Strickland GC LLC .ACCEPTED BY. City of Edmonds Phil Williams Public Works DirerAor City of Edmonds STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SINOHOrvllSH 1 )8S Porterfield Dgetagmem, LLC, Date On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in end: who.execuled the .within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that s/he signed the same as his/her free and voluntary act and deed. for the uses and purpow therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND. OFFICIAL SEAT, THIS DAYOF- 20I7. NOTARY PUBIK in and for the State ofWashington, residing at —74)L( 'Z' //. t N r N Packet Pg. 92 6.5.c STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that R Lee Porterfield is the person who appeared before me, and that person acknowledged signing this instrument, on oath stated their authority to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Member of Porterfield Development LLC to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this 5 day of 12017. �re..i rzrZ3,t.Fre�1 (Print Name) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: tfi 9 t N_ N -7 e) Lt --,- 4- Packet Pg. 93 6.5.c STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS COUNTY OF WASCO ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Brenda Thomas is the person who appeared before me, and that person acknowledged signing this instrument, on oath stated their authority to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Member of Strickland GC Properties LLC to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. SUBSCRIBED and SwoRN to before me this *5bday of Z;.x-e— 12017. 6/ L -7! (Print N e) Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon, residing at My commission expires: is -ZZ Aej OFFW,L VAMP "E OW Oi� �I!/kIC IMR r COMMON W 90142 N NM�to -70 q 4 /b Packet Pg. 94 6.5.c EXHIBIT A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIQu EASkMFNT LEGAL DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL NO, 005669004D07D4 PARENT PARCEL: PARCEL A: THE SOUTH 92.92 FEET OF THE NORTH 261,92 FEET OF LOT 7, PARCEL B: THE EAST 20 FEET OF LOT 7, EXCEPT THE NORTH 261.9.2 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL C: THE SOUTH 92,92 FEET OF THE NORTH 261.92 FEET OF THE EAST 14.5 FEET OF LOT 8: ALL IN BLOCK 4, SEA TTLE HEIGHTS 01 VISION NO.4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME OF PLATS, PAGE 11. RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON". SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF S\'OHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTO%s, TEMPORARY C NSTRLrCi7QN EASEMENT: .A PORTION OF THE ABOYB DESCRIBED PARENT PARCEL MORI~ -PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTH FIVE FEET OF THE SOUTH TEN FEET OF TfIE ABOVE DESCRIBED PA NT PARCEL: - CONTAINING 100 SQUARE FEET, MORE FOR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, SNVOHOMISH CotNTY, WASHINGTOIV_ SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" t N r N `fnLA 5/� Packet Pg. 95 6.5.c � f I. !!P f I I 1 �la f 3 F V 1) ONCRE VON w+-pl, BRASS n RIVET w I CASE P.0.W. 2WH ar $W EXHI T B WI LI-) ;?%'L 3055690-1y�%VV 1 L1 I F- - - - --i f "n IN 4"k4- CONC MON IN WATER VALVE CASE. c 7+-4-8:.95 I'EmptRARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT i .50 29 — � �i G� 58B'Q#'36'rr i7�8.98 Op t T. JLI iY Elti j{F T g �l e N ia9 �LGT �AIC1 TEMPORARY CONSTRU'C iON tASEWNT. AREA='OO S' ---- EXI"NG RIGHT -•Of -,WAY PROPOSED RIGHT Or WAY 9qr( 06/?9f;7 71:7�n - P:� jCOm70CG7W1�0a?SC►U�SYWINILSA�eIjMYSOcoed{YWi-Par:�*fC6�I�fsntd.q E)a4w S I LI MQ19 4 1 K„IOnNa00pd mn.. ' w.... vw:hwsw aTi 78TH AND 2VTH 5T SW TEMP. CONST, E$MT. PORT>ERFELD t N_ 04 Packet Pg. 96 6.5.d City of Edmonds TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 76th @ 212Ih Intersection Improvements Project Property Address 7525 212th St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 00566900400703 Property Owner(s): Porterfield Development LLC and Strickland GC LLC The undersigned property owners, for themselves and for their heirs, successors and assigns, hereafter together referred to as "GRANTOR(S)", for and in consideration of the promises set forth below and the improvements to the City's 76`h (& 212th Intersection Improvements Project (hereafter "Project") hereby convey and grant to the City of Edmonds, a Municipal Corporation, and its successors and assigns, hereafter together referred to as "the City", a temporary, non-exclusive easement (the "Temporary Construction Easement") over, under, in, along, across and upon the GRANTOR(S)' property as legally described on Exhibit A and depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the "Temporary Easement Area"), for the purpose of Project work. The GRANTOR(S) further grant the use of the property adjacent to the Temporary Easement Area for the purpose of performing utility work as generally depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto. Work will include the installation of a temporary PUD pole and guy wire to hold a recently installed PUD pole. All costs of this work shall be completely borne by the City. The GRANTOR(S) and the City, by accepting and signing this document, mutually covenant and agree as follows: 1. The City shall, upon completion of the work, remove all construction debris and restore the surface of the above -described property to substantially its original condition, except as modified by the subject Project. 2. This Temporary Construction Easement shall commence upon the date this Agreement is signed by both parties and shall terminate and expire upon substantial completion of the project. 3. Upon the expiration of the term of this Temporary Construction Easement, all of the rights and benefits of the City in, to and under this Agreement with respect to the Temporary Construction Easement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. DATED this day of 2017. Packet Pg. 97 6.5.d Strickland GC LLC ACCEPTED BY: City of Edmonds Phil Williams Public Works Director City of Edmonds STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHONHSH Porterfield Development, LLC Date On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that s/he signed the same as his/her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS _ DAY OF , 2017. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Packet Pg. 98 6.5.d EXHIBIT A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL NO. 00566900400703 PARENT PARCEL: THE EAST 84.36 FEET OF LOT 7, BLOCK 4, SEATTLE HEIGHTS DIVISION NOA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 11, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 261.92 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: A PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARENT PARCEL MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MONUMENTED CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 19, 20, 29, AND 30, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. THENCE SOUTH 88004'36" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29 AND THE CENTERLINE OF 212TH STREET SOUTHWEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 163.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 °55'24" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.80 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID 212TH STREET SOUTHWEST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 1 °55'24" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79045'54" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 54.89 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARENT PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 0037'02" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88004'36" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79045' 54" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 8.48 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88050'53" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.67 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 281 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT `B" Packet Pg. 99 6.5.d FOUND CONCRETE MON WITH BRASS RIVET IN EXHIBIT B CAR WASH I I '-E�L P„R L. vv5658w•�uv iiv 'OB TEMP. t R. 0. W. i *02 R.O.W.212TH ST SW L7. S88'04'36"E 163.61' L �0 R.O.W. UTILITY ESM7 �± R.O.W. 0 311 sD LEGEND ® TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. AREA=281 SF L- TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INVERTED NAIL L3 IN 4"X4" CONC L4 MON IN WATER VALVE CASE. R.O. W. 27+48.96 L5 M _ L6 2+00 2748.96 S88'04'36"E ---- EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ggw 06/29/17 10:20am — P:\c\COED00000004\0400CAD\SV\DWG\Sheet\svEM09coed0004—Car Wash —TC— Esmt.dwg EXHIBIT B DATE 6-21-17 DESIGN: 9Ja RE• COED0004 /svEM09eoed0004 DRAWN: a10 LINE TABLE LINE NO. BEARING LENGTH L1 N01'55'24"E 35.80' L2 S01'55'24"W 5.00' L3 S88'04'36"E 54.89' L4 S00'37'02"W 5.80' L5 N88'04'36"W 14.96' L6 N79'45'54"W 8.48' l 31.67' L7 N88'50'53"W EN DAVID EVANS ANY ASSOCIATES iNO• 1620 W. Merine lAew Drive, suite 200 Evem[L Washington 90201 Phone: 425.259.4099 76TH AND 212TH ST SW TEMP. CONST. ESMT. CAR WASH Packet Pg. 100 6.5.e City—orEdinonds Real Propertv Voucher 76"' @ 212"' Intersection Improvements Project Claimant(s) Strickland GC LLC and Porterfield Development LLC 811 IST AVE # 422 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Tax Parcel No. 00566900400703 and 00566900400704, inclusive A full, complete, and final payment for settlement for the title or interest conveyed or released as fully set forth in the Temporary Construction Easement (dated July 1, 2017) and Utility Easement (dated June 27`�, 2017). Utility Easement: 297 SF $6,682.50 Temporary Construction Easement: 381 SF $1,714..50 Improvements: Large Tree 2 units $2,000.00 TOTAL (rounded) $10,500.00 I / we have agreed to the compensation listed above as the full and final payment for the loss of 2 large trees. The City of Edmonds will not, at any time in the future, be responsible for any additional cost above and beyond the amount listed above, nor for the construction of such improvement (or repair). I /we hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the items and amounts listed herein are proper charges against the City of Edmonds, that the same or any part thereof has not been paid, and that I / we am / are authorized to sign for the claimant. Strickland GC LLC Printed Name:rt'.tftC�i Title: Date:1— l' Packet Pg. 101 6.5.e City of Edmonds By: Printed Name: Title: Date: c m E as w N N a+ D r u w 0 L- a. c m E m 0 L Q E i :i N L N N Ca t t0 ti r a Packet Pg. 102 6.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Custodial Services Interlocal Agreement with Town of Woodway Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Public Works & Utilities Preparer: Royce Napolitino Background/History The City of Edmonds, Facilities Division is proposing to provide custodial services to the Town of Woodway at their City Hall. This is a new issue. Staff Recommendation It is the recommendation of the staff that this Interlocal Agreement be approved and the Mayor authorized to sign it on behalf of the City. Narrative The purpose of this agreement is to provide for certain custodial services to the Town of Woodway. This Agreement does not create a separate entity for the provision of services. Rather, it is the intent of the parties that Edmonds shall provide Woodway with twice monthly custodial/cleaning services for the facility known as Woodway Town Hall. The services will be provided by City of Edmonds custodial staff. All Edmonds staff will maintain: necessary background checks; drivers abstracts; criminal justice information training and certification required by the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation; appropriate medical vaccinations; current CPR/First Aid card; professional knowledge regarding best practices and industry standards for custodial work and green cleaning products; compliance with required Safety Data Sheet labeling and/or documentation; compliance with exposure safety protocols; and knowledge of any site specific hazards that may be known. City of Edmonds Custodial staff is proposing a twice monthly 3 hour shift to clean the City of Woodway's City Hall. Woodway has agreed to pay $100 per hour to the City of Edmonds equaling approximately $600 a month. Our custodians on average make 23.75 an hour plus benefits and 2% premium(Public safety 8 hour shift) which on average is $11.16 plus the 8 hours at 2% premium approximately .50 cents an hour. We will also supply cleaning chemicals only at a monthly cost of $20 dollars. Edmonds should be in the black $360+ per month on average, with this profit being used to supplement deeper dive clean projects at City of Edmonds buildings at overtime rates. Expenses Hourly Month Totals Hourly Avg. Rate $23.75 142.50 Three Hours Benefits $11.16 66.96 Eight Hours at 2% $ .50 8.00 Supplies $3.33 19.98 Woodway's Contribution $100 x 1 hour/ 6 hours a month Packet Pg. 103 s.s $38.74 237.44 $600.00 Attachments: Woodway Custodial Services ILA Packet Pg. 104 6.6.a AGREEMENT FOR CUSTODIAL SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT CHAPTER 39.34 RCW WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington is an optional code city constituted in accordance with the provisions of Title 35A of the Revised Code of Washington; and WHEREAS, the Town of Woodway is a Town organized pursuant to certain provisions of Title 35 of the Revised Code of Washington; and WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act authorizes public agencies, including municipal corporations, to exercise their respective powers and any power capable of being exercised by either party pursuant to an interlocal agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds and the Town Council of the Town of Woodway deem it to be in the public interest to enter into an interlocal agreement for the provision of custodial services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth therein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises set forth in this interlocal agreement and the mutual benefits to be derived, the City of Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "Edmonds") and the Town of Woodway (hereinafter "Woodway") have entered into this interlocal agreement in accordance with the provisions set forth below: I. TERM —DURATION THIS AGREEMENT for Custodial Services ("Agreement") shall have a two (2) year term commencing on July 1, 2017 and expiring on June 30, 2019. 1.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party prior to the above expiration date without cause by the provision of ninety (90) days' written notice as set forth in Paragraph 10.1 herein. 1.2 This Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause, and without the requirement of ninety (90) days' written notice if, but only if: 1.2.1 Prior written notice of an alleged breach of the terms of the Agreement is provided to the City or Town Clerk; and 1.2.2 The breach is not cured within 48 hours of the actual receipt of the written notification of breach. Packet Pg. 105 6.6.a II. PURPOSE — SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT is to provide for certain custodial services to the Town of Woodway. This Agreement does not create a separate entity for the provision of services. Rather, it is the intent of the parties that Edmonds shall provide Woodway with twice monthly custodial/cleaning services for the facility known as Woodway Town Hall. The services will be provided by union represented City of Edmonds custodial staff. All Edmonds staff will maintain: necessary background checks; drivers abstracts; criminal justice information training and certification required by the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation; appropriate medical vaccinations; current CPR/First Aid card; professional knowledge regarding best practices and industry standards for custodial work and green cleaning products; compliance with required Safety Data Sheet labeling and/or documentation; compliance with exposure safety protocols; and knowledge of any site specific hazards that may be known (such as storage of fuel, chlorine, fertilizer, etc.). III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES 3.1 Edmonds's responsibilities in providing the above -described twice monthly services, for an estimated three to four (3-4) hours per visit, are as follows: 3.1.1 Appropriately dispose of trash, recycling and shredded paper (first floor shred bucket) building wide. 3.1.2 Dust all areas of the building, including windowsills and office desks, as appropriate. 3.1.3 Disinfect all hard surface countertops, dais, door knobs and door push/pull bars. 3.1.4 Sweep and wet mop all hard surface flooring. 3.1.5 Vacuum all carpeted surfaces in common areas and offices (with spot cleaning as directed). 3.1.6 Clean elevator stainless steel surfaces. 3.1.7 Disinfect and clean kitchen counters, clean both building microwave ovens and range/refrigerator as needed. 3.1.8 Clean three bathrooms and one shower using accepted disinfectant procedures, including mirrors. 3.1.9 Clean, dust and mop locker room. 3.1.10 Wipe and disinfect phones. 2 Packet Pg. 106 6.6.a 3.1.11 Maintain entry area glass interior and exterior. 3.1.12 Provide clean chemicals and consumable cleaning materials (rags, mop heads etc.). Special arrangements shall be made for seasonal services such as garage sweeping, carpet cleaning, hard surface floor care, high dusting and window washing (interior only). 3.2 Woodway's responsibilities in connection with the above -described services are as follows [Add responsibilities below, if any]: 3.2.1 [E.g., provide access to Town Hall at certain times]. 3.2.2 [Schedule twice monthly visits at least 30 days in advance, Monday through Friday, during the hours of 4:00 am to 12:00 pm and 4:00 pm to 12:00 am, or on weekends by special request]. 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5 IV. OVERSIGHT AND REPORTING 4.1 The Edmonds and Woodway Public Works Directors, or their designees, shall act as administrators of this Agreement for the purposes of RCW 39.34.030. 4.2 Reporting by Edmonds will consist of the detailed quarterly billing described in Section VI, below. V. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS No Special Duty or Third Party Right Created. The parties understand and agree that in the event of an emergent situation in Edmonds, services under this Agreement may be delayed or suspended. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to create any third party right, nor is any special duty to any third party, private party, person or entity created as a result of this Agreement. VI. BILLING PROCESS 6.1 Woodway shall pay to Edmonds the sum of $100.00 per hour for the services provided by Edmonds under the terms of this Agreement, including any "special arrangement" seasonal services. This hourly rate includes prevailing wages, benefits, transportation, consumables, uniforms, training, administrative fees and work compliance documentation. This 3 Packet Pg. 107 6.6.a hourly rate shall increase beginning on July 1, 2018 by the percentage increase in wages for 2018 as set forth in the City's collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters, which agreement is scheduled to be negotiated in 2017. If the collective bargaining agreement has not been finalized by July 1, 2018, this hourly rate shall increase on that date by 100% of the Seattle Tacoma Bremerton CPI-U. 6.2 Edmonds shall provide a detailed quarterly billing, which shall include at a minimum the dates and hours of services and a description of the services provided. Payment shall be remitted within 30 days of billing. In the event of a dispute regarding billing, the parties agree to submit the dispute to binding arbitration or such other form of alternative dispute resolution (mediation) as the parties shall approve. VII. SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT Edmonds shall provide the above -described custodial services through use of its own equipment and supplies, and shall be responsible for all costs associated therewith, including but not limited to damage from any kind or nature and normal wear and tear. VIII. LIABILITY AND INDEMNITY 8.1 Edmonds shall indemnify and hold harmless Woodway, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, cause or liability of any kind or nature whatsoever arising from or out of the negligence or wrongful tortious act of an Edmonds employee in the provision of services under this Agreement. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless shall include a waiver of the immunity provided by Title 51 RCW, to, but only to the extent necessary to fully effectuate its promise. 8.2 Woodway shall indemnify and hold harmless Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, cause or liability of any kind or nature whatsoever arising from or out of the negligence or wrongful tortious act of a Woodway employee in the provision of services under this Agreement. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless shall include a waiver of the immunity provided by Title 51 RCW, to, but only to the extent necessary to fully effectuate its promise. 8.3 In the event of a claim, loss or liability based upon the alleged concurrent or joint negligence or tortious act of the parties, the parties shall bear their respective liability, including costs, in accordance with an assignment of their respective liability established in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. IX. INDEPENDENT GOVERNMENTS Edmonds and Woodway recognize and agree that each is an independent governmental entity. Except for the specific terms herein, nothing herein shall be construed to limit the discretion of the governing bodies of each party. Specifically and without limiting the foregoing, Edmonds shall have the sole discretion and the obligation to determine the exact method by which the services are to be provided unless otherwise stipulated within this Agreement. Neither 2 Packet Pg. 108 6.6.a Edmonds nor Woodway, except as expressly set forth herein or as required by law, shall be liable for any debts or obligations of the other party. X. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 10.1 Noticing Procedures. All notices, demands, requests, consents and approvals which may, or are required to be given by any party to any other party hereunder, shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally, sent by facsimile, sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or if mailed or deposited in the United States mail, sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid to: For the City of Edmonds: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 For the Town of Woodway: Clerk Treasurer Town of Woodway [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] AND Department Director Public Works Department 7110 21011 Street SW Edmonds, WA 98020 AND Department Director Public Works Department [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] Or, to such other address as the parties may from time to time designate in writing and deliver in a like manner. All notices shall be deemed complete upon actual receipt or refusal to accept delivery. Facsimile or electronic mail transmission of any signed original document and retransmission of any signed facsimile or electronic mail transmission shall be the same as delivery of an original document. 10.2 Other Cooperative Agreements. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the parties from entering into contracts for services in support of this Agreement. 10.3 Public Duty Doctrine. This Agreement shall not be construed to provide any benefits to any third parties. Specifically, and without limiting the foregoing, this Agreement shall not create or be construed as creating an exception to the Public Duty Doctrine. The parties shall cooperate in good faith and execute such documents as necessary to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 5 Packet Pg. 109 6.6.a 10.4 Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties. Any prior understanding, written or oral, shall be deemed merged with its provisions. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing with the express written consent of the City Council and Town Council of the respective parties. 10.5 Jurisdiction and Venue. Jurisdiction and venue for this Agreement lies exclusively in Snohomish County, Washington. 10.6 Additional Provisions. In addition to the provisions set forth above, the following provisions are included pursuant to the requirements of RCW 39.34.030. 10.6.1 No joint property ownership is contemplated under the terms of this Agreement. In the event, at the termination of this Agreement, any personal property is jointly owned by the parties, either party may purchase the interest of the other, with the other party's permission, at fair market value, as such value is determined by the parties. In the event that neither party wishes to retain jointly obtained property, it shall be surplussed and the proceeds divided pro-rata based upon the party's initial contribution to the purchase of such property. If both parties seek ownership of the property, value shall be determined as herein provided and the right of the parties to purchase the property or properties determined by the drawing of lots. 10.6.2 This Agreement shall be effective when listed by subject on the City of Edmonds' web site, the Town of Woodway's web site or another electronically retrievable public source, whichever shall first occur. EXECUTED this day of , 2017. CITY OF EDMONDS TOWN OF WOODWAY 1.2 Mayor David O. Earling ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED ma I0 Mayor Carla A. Nichols ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED By: Scott Passey, City Clerk Heidi Napolitino, Clerk Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: rel Packet Pg. 110 6.6.a OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY: LOW 7 Packet Pg. 111 6.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Proposed Noise Ordinance Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Engineering Preparer: Rob English Background/History On June 13, 2017, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded for further discussion at the June 20th Council meeting. On June 20, 2017, Council directed staff to update the code language regarding the proposed noise exemption for City construction to clarify that the granting of such exemptions employ a process similar to the "balanced factor" approach utilized in the Code section governing variances. On June 27, 2017, staff presented revised information to the Public Works, Parks and Planning Committee. On July 11, 2017, staff presented this item to City Council and the Council voted to approve the proposed code changes. Staff Recommendation Approve the proposed changes and direct staff to place an ordinance on the consent agenda to revise Chapter 5.30 of the Edmonds City Code. Narrative Attached are proposed code changes to Chapter 5.30, "Noise Abatement and Control" related to exemptions for sounds created by City construction projects. The new provisions in section 5.30.100, "Exemptions", has been further amended to specify that City construction work will be subject to an exemption process similar to that used in the variance process. Staff have also drafted a Public Works Policy detailing the criteria and method for the granting of a noise exemption, and have also produced a sample Exemption Application as guidance on what a successful application would look like. The Public Works policy makes clear that all memoranda resulting in a successful administrative exemption to the noise ordinance will be forwarded to City Council members. Attachments: Proposed Noise Ordinance 071817 Attachment A Example Exemption Application Packet Pg. 112 s.7 Public Works Night Work Policy Packet Pg. 113 6.7.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY' S NOISE ABATEMENT AND CONTROL CODE. WHEREAS, city staff has recommended changes to the city's noise ordinance primarily to allow for additional exemptions from the noise abatement and control code for public projects in light of the public interest furthered by those projects and the cost of having to comply with the current code; and WHEREAS, city staff has proposed criteria that would be considered to determine whether a project should be granted an administrative exemption from the provisions of the noise abatement and control code; and WHEREAS, a similar process would also available for private sector projects; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 5.30 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Noise Abatement and Control," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Attachment A hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfike thr-ough). Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance. Packet Pg. 114 6.7.a APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED : CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Im JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 115 6.7.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2017, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY' S NOISE ABATEMENT AND CONTROL CODE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 12017. 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 3 CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 116 6.7.b Attachment A Chapter 5.30 NOISE ABATEMENT AND CONTROL Sections: 5.30.010 Declaration of policy. 5.30.020 Definitions. 5.30.030 Unlawful sounds. 5.30.040 Maximum permissible sound levels. 5.30.050 Modification to maximum permissible sound levels. 5.30.060 Motor vehicle noises — Stationary test. 5.30.070 Motor vehicle noises — Road test. 5.30.080 Mufflers. 5.30.090 Tire noise. 5.30.100 Exemptions. 5.30.110 Sounds exempt during daytime hours. 5.30.120 Variances. 5.30.130 Public disturbance noises. 5.30.140 Citizen complaints. 5.30.150 Penalties. 5.30.160 Severability. 5.30.200 Quiet zones — Establishment. 5.30.210 Criteria for establishing a quiet zone. 5.30.220 Quiet zone signs. 5.30.230 Noise prohibited in quiet zones. 5.30.240 Schedule of quiet zones. 5.30.010 Declaration of pol[cy. .................................................................................................................................................. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the city of Edmonds to minimize the exposure of citizens to the physiological and psychological dangers of excessive noise and to protect, promote and preserve the public health, safety and general welfare. It is the express intent of the city council to control the level of noise in a manner which promotes commerce, the use, value and enjoyment of property, sleep and repose, and the quality of the environment. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193, 1981]. Packet Pg. 117 6.7.b 5.30.020 Definitions. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings. All technical terminology used in this chapter and not defined specifically herein shall be interpreted in conformance with American National Standards Institute's Specifications. A. "dB(A)" means the sound level measured in decibels, using the "A" weighting network on a sound level meter. B. "District" means the land use zone to which the provisions of this chapter are applied. For the purposes of this chapter: 1. "Residential district" includes all R classified zones and includes the Open Space zone. 2. "Business" zone means all zones designated BN or BC. 3. "Commercial" zones include all zones classified CW or CG. C. "Emergency work" means work required to restore property to a safe condition following a public calamity, work required to protect persons or property from an immediate exposure to danger, or work by private or public utilities for providing or restoring immediately necessary utility services. D. "Equipment" means any stationary or portable device or any part thereof capable of generating sound. E. "Frequent, repetitive or intermittently continuous sounds" means sounds that are continuous for a period of 10 or more minutes or intermittent for a period totaling 20 or more minutes. F. "Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR)" means the value specified by the manufacturer as the recommended maximum loaded weight of a single vehicle. G. "Motor vehicle" means any vehicle which is self-propelled, used primarily for transporting persons or property upon public highways. Aircraft, watercraft, and vehicles used exclusively on stationary rails or track are not motor vehicles as that term is used herein. It includes motorcycles unless distinction is made in the context of use. H. "Motorcycle" means any motor vehicle having a saddle for the use of the rider and designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground; except that farm tractors and vehicles powered by engines of less than five horsepower shall not be included. Packet Pg. 118 6.7.b I. "Muffler" means a device consisting of a series of chambers or other mechanical designs for the purpose of receiving exhaust gas from an internal combustion engine and effective in reducing sound resulting therefrom. J. "Noise control administrator" means the person designated by the mayor to enforce the provisions of this chapter. In addition to the noise control administrator, any police officer may enforce the provisions of this chapter. K. "Person" means any individual, firm, association, partnership, corporation or any other entity, public or private. L. "Property boundary" means the surveyed line at ground surface which separates the real property owned, rented or leased by one or more persons from that owned, rented or leased by another or others, and its vertical extension. M. "Receiving property" means the real property within which sound originating from outside the property is received. N. "Race vehicle' means a motor vehicle not licensed for use on the public streets and/or which is used primarily for sanctioned or unsanctioned racing events. Race vehicle shall also include power boats used primarily for racing events. O. "Sound level meter" means a sound level measuring device either type I or type II certified special use meters as defined by American National Standards Institute's Specifications. [Ord. 3989 § 1, 2015; Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 3, 1981]. 5.30.030 Unlawful sounds. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... It is unlawful for any person to cause sound, or for any person in possession of property to permit sound originating from such property, to intrude into the real property of another person whenever such sound exceeds the maximum permissible sound level established in this chapter. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 4, 1981]. 5.30.040 Maximum permissible sound levels. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . The maximum permissible sound level as measured at the property line or anywhere within the receiving property shall be as set forth in the following table: Packet Pg. 119 6.7.b District of District of Receiving Property Sound Residential Business Commercial Source Residential 55 dB(A) 57 60 Business 57 60 65 Commercial 60 65 70 Commercial 60 65 [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 5, 1981]. 5.30.050 Modification to maximum permissible sound levels. The maximum permissible sound levels established by this chapter shall be reduced or increased by the sum of the following: A. Between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the noise levels shall be reduced by 10 dB(A) for receiving property within residential districts, except for noise from electrical substations and existing stationary equipment used in conveyance of water by a utility. B. At any hour of the day or night, the applicable noise levels may be exceeded for any receiving property by no more than: 1. 5 dB(A) for a total of 15 minutes in any one hour period, or 2. 10 dB(A) for a total of five minutes in any one hour period, or 3. 15 dB(A) for a total of 1.5 minutes in any one hour period. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 6, 1981]. 5.30.060 Motor vehicle noises — Stationary test. It is unlawful for any person to operate any motor vehicle upon any public highway or easement road if the vehicle exhaust system exceeds the maximum permissible sound levels for the category of vehicle as measured at a distance of 20 inches (.5 meter) from the exhaust outlet under procedures set forth in WAC , as now exists or as hereafter adopted or amended. Q Packet Pg. 120 6.7.b Max. Model Vehicle Category Sound Year Level Motorcycles Before 99 dB(A) 1986 Automobiles, light trucks, and motor Before 95 dB(A) vehicles 10,000 pounds GVWR or less 1986 All motor vehicles over 10,000 pounds Before 86 dB(A) GVWR 1986 While on real property other than highways or easement roads, motor vehicles shall not exceed the maximum permissible sounds as specified herein for other than motor vehicles. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 7, 1981]. 5.30.070 Motor vehicle noises — Road test. It is unlawful for any person to operate any motor vehicle or any combination of motor vehicles upon any public highway or easement road under any conditions of grade, load, acceleration or deceleration in such a manner as to exceed the maximum permissible sound levels for the category of vehicle as measured at a distance of 50 feet from the center of the lane of travel within the speed limit specified under procedures set forth in WAC 204-56, as now exists or as may hereafter be amended or modified: 45 mph Over 45 Vehicle Category or less mph Motorcycles 78 dB(A) 82 dB(A) Motor vehicles over 10,000 86 dB(A) 90 dB(A) pounds GVWR All other motor vehicles 72 dB(A) 78 dB(A) While on real property other than highways or easement roads, motor vehicles shall not exceed the maximum permissible sounds as specified herein for other than motor vehicles. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 8, 1981]. 5.30.080 Mufflers. It is unlawful for any person to operate, or for any owner to permit any person to operate, any motor vehicle upon the public highways or easement roads which is not equipped with a muffler in good working order, in Q Packet Pg. 121 6.7.b constant operation, and which meets the requirements established by RCW 46.37.390 as now exists or as may hereafter be amended. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 9, 1981] 5.30.090 Tire noise. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . It is unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle in such a manner as to cause or allow to be emitted squealing, screeching or other such sound from the tires in contact with the ground or other roadway surface because of rapid acceleration or excessive speed around corners or other such reason; provided, that the sounds resulting from emergency braking to avoid imminent danger shall be exempt from this section. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 10, 1981]. 5.30.100 Exemptions. A. The following sounds are exempt from the provisions of this chapter at all times: 1A. Noises caused by motor vehicles used for highway maintenance or noises caused in the performance of emergency work for the immediate safety, health or welfare of the community or of individuals of the community, or to restore property in a safe condition following a public calamity. 219. Sounds created by bells, chimes or carillons not operating for more than five minutes in any one hour. 3&. Sounds originating from aircraft in flight, and from watercraft. 413. Sounds created by safety and protective devices, such as relief valves, where noise suppression would defeat the safety release purpose of the device. 5€. Sounds created by fire alarms and emergency equipment operated by law enforcement, fire fighters and aid personnel. 6. Sounds created by the operation of equipment or facilities of surface carriers engaged in commerce by railroad. 7C. Sounds originating from officially sanctioned parades and other events to which the general public is solicited to attend without charge and sounds originating from league or school sponsored athletic events. 84. Sounds caused by natural phenomena and unamplified human voices, except for public disturbance noises as set forth in ECC 5.30.130. Packet Pg. 122 6.7.b B. The following sounds between the hours of 10 pm and 7 am, are exempt from the provisions of this chapter, pursuant to a concurring Public Works Staff Decision, balancing the same factors as listed in 5.30.120(C)(1-5), and approved by the Mayor or the Mayor's designee: 11. Sounds originating from street construction or repair projects performed by or on behalf of the city of Edmonds. 2d. Sounds originating from the repair or installation of essential utility services performed by or on behalf of the city of Edmonds such as, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, domestic water, electrical, natural gas and other essential utility services. 5.30.110 Sounds exempt during daytime hours.° SHRRE A. The following sounds are exempt from the provisions of this chapter between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.: 1. Sounds originating from residential property relating to homeowner -sponsored temporary projects for the maintenance and repair of existing homes and grounds, including but not limited to lawn mowers, saws, hammering and gardening. This exemption applies to the construction of such incidental appurtenances for existing homes as fences, decks, patios, carports, swimming pools, ponds, walkways and private kennels. This exemption excludes sounds from race vehicles. 2. Sounds created by blasting. 3. Sounds created by the installation or repair of essential utility services or public road projects. B. Sounds originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt from the provisions of this chapter, but only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and federal holidays. [Ord. 3469 & 1, 2003; Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 & 12, 19811. 5.30.120 Variances. A. Variances may be granted to any person from any requirement of ECC 5.30.040 or 5.30.110 if findings are made that immediate compliance with such requirement cannot be achieved Formatted: Space After: 12 pt, Line ; At least 19.2 pt, Font Alignment: Base Packet Pg. 123 6.7.b because of special circumstances rendering immediate compliance unreasonable in light of economic or physical factors, encroachment upon an existing noise source or because of nonavailability of feasible technology or control methods. B. Any such variance or renewal thereof shall be granted only for the minimum time period found to be necessary under the facts and circumstances. C. Variances shall be processed i^ the felle iRg MaRRe4:as a Type 1 permit procedure under ECDC 20.01.003.13, while using the criteria found in subsection A of this section. Factors to be balanced in the process include those identified as follows: same manner provided for ECDC 20.95.02C)TYPe 11 A land use deg'siens (see, fqF examp! a4—_ 1. Public convenience — Will the work result in significant delays for transportation, services, or other customer needs if done only during the day and within the hour restrictions set out in other parts of this chapter? 2. Public Safety — does working at night significantly improve safety conditions for the traveling public and/or construction workers? 3. Public exposure — What will be the setting for any proposed work outside of regular hours? Is it located on an arterial street or in a mostly residential area? 4. Public cost — Does a limited amount of authorized work outside of regular hours established by this chapter save the public significant cost compared to daytime work? Packet Pg. 124 S. Have all reasonable steps been taken to reduce the impact of any necessary noise outside the standard hours? Answering this question needs to include evaluation of (1) limiting the night time or early morning work to only that necessary to reasonably mitigate the issues identified above, (2) use of quiet generators and quiet pumps (as available), (3) drilling and placing of piles instead of driving them, as well as use of other techniques, design choices, and acoustic control equipment and strategies necessary to minimize the night-time or early morning impacts from construction noise. D. The grant of a variance shall not relieve any person from the requirements of ECC 5.30.130 relating to public disturbance noises. 5.30.130 Public disturbance noises. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . It is unlawful for any person knowingly to cause or make, or for any person in possession of property knowingly to allow to originate from the property, unreasonable noise which disturbs another, and to refuse or intentionally fail to cease the unreasonable noise when ordered to do so by a police officer. Public disturbance noises shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following sounds or combinations of sounds: A. Frequent, repetitive or intermittently continuous sounds made by any horn or siren attached to a motor vehicle except such sounds that are made to warn of danger or that are specifically permitted or required by law. B. Frequent, repetitive or intermittently continuous sounds made in connection with the starting, operation, repair, rebuilding or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle, race vehicle, off -highway vehicle or internal combustion engine. C. Loud and frequent, repetitive or intermittently continuous sounds made by the use of a musical instrument or instruments or other device capable of producing sound when struck by an object, of a whistle, or of a sound amplifier or other device capable of producing, amplifying or reproducing sounds. D. Loud and frequent, repetitive or intermittently continuous sounds made by the unamplified human voice or voices between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5" Packet Pg. 125 6.7.b E. Sounds made for any duration or frequency from the starting and/or running of the engine of a race vehicle. [Ord. 3988 § 1, 2015; Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 14, 1981] 5.30.140 Citizen complaints. Whenever it is stated in writing by three or more persons having separate residences in a neighborhood that any person is violating any of the provisions of this chapter, the noise control administrator or his/her designee shall review such complaints. After the noise control administrator or his/her designee determines that a violation has occurred, the administrator or his/her designee shall advise the owner of the complaint and that such violation is a nuisance and must cease. Failure of any person to cease any violation of this chapter shall be subject to penalties as established in this chapter. [Ord. 3989 § 2, 2015; Ord. 2853 § 27, 1991; Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 15, 1981]. 5.30.150 Penalties. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . A. Any person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a civil infraction, which shall be punishable by a fine of $100.00. B. Any person committing a second violation of any provision of this chapter within one calendar year shall be guilty of a civil infraction, which shall be punishable by a fine of $250.00. C. Any person committing a third violation of any provision of this chapter within one calendar year shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, be sentenced to a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or 90 days in jail. [Ord. 3989 § 3, 2015; Ord. 2853 § 28, 1991; Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 16, 1981]. 5.30.160 Severability. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . If any word, phrase or other portion of this chapter is for any reason held invalid, the remaining portions of this chapter shall not be affected. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193 § 17, 1981]. 5.30.200 Quiet zones — Establishment. The city council shall conduct a public hearing to consider the establishment of a quiet zone when: A. Five or more persons from different residences within the same neighborhood sign a petition requesting the establishment of a quiet zone, and file the same with the planning department; and B. Notice of such hearing is given in the manner prescribed for hearing a proposed rezone. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2372 § 1, 1983]. Packet Pg. 126 6.7.b 5.30.210 Criteria for establishing a quiet zone. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . A quiet zone is appropriate for any area disturbed by noise meeting the following criteria: A. Such noise originates from multiple sources in the neighborhood. B. Such noise is prevalent with substantial frequency during any 30-day period and there is a high likelihood of recurrence. C. The source of such noise is transient. D. The noise is generated from locations on public streets, parks, play grounds and the like immediately adjacent to residential districts or other uses requiring peace and quiet such as hospitals, convalescent homes, and libraries. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2372 § 2, 1983]. 5.30.220 Quiet zone si..ns............................................................................................................................................................ Any area designated by this procedure as a quiet zone shall be clearly marked by signs that state in substance: "Quiet Zone, use of radios, tape players, musical instruments and similar devices prohibited if audible over 30 feet away." [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2372 § 3, 1983]. 5.30.230 Noise prohibited in quiet zones. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . The following acts when committed in a quiet zone are prohibited: A. Radios, Tape Players, etc. The using, operating, playing, or permitting to be used, operated or played any radio, tape player, television, musical instrument, record player or any other machine or device for the producing or reproducing sound in such a manner as to 1. Disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of the neighboring inhabitants, or 2. Generate sound with a volume that is audible at a distance of over 30 feet from the machine or device. B. Horns, Signaling Devices, etc. The continuous or repetitive sounding of any horn or signaling device on any automobile, motorcycle, other vehicle on any street or public place in such quiet zone, except as a danger warning. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2372 § 4, 1983]. 5.30.240 Schedule of quiet zones. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . Packet Pg. 127 6.7.b In accordance with the provisions of this chapter and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall at any time commit any act proscribed by ECC in any of the following described quiet zones: A. Sunset Avenue North, from Edmonds Street to Caspers Street. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2385 § 1, 1983; Ord. 2372 § 5, 1983]. Packet Pg. 128 6.7.c RE: Request for Exemption, Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer Cured in Place Pipe Rehabilitation (Highway 99 site), Five Night Construction Activity Dear Mayor Earling: CONTRACTOR requests a 5 night temporary exemption for night / weekend construction work for the project described below within the City of Edmonds. Enclosed within this request is a vicinity map, aerial photos of the vicinity and a list of residents within 300 feet of the project. CONTRACTOR requests temporary relief from the requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-60-040 and Edmonds City Code per ECC5.30.100.. This would permit CONTRACTOR to conduct construction activities within the City between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM for 5 consecutive or nonconsecutive nights between March 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Project Description CONTRACTOR, as part of its ongoing maintenance project has determined that the sanitary sewer pipe located on Highway 99 from 216t" St SW and 220t" At SW has deteriorated to the point in which a new pipe needs to be installed. Since the pipe slope has not been compromised during the life of this pipe system, a trenchless pipe rehabilitation solution is possible. This solution, called Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) works much in the same way that a stent would for coronary artery surgery on the circulatory system. The new pipe will be installed via the existing manholes located along this stretch of Highway 99. Equipment of be used for the project will mainly be relegated to trucks, compressors, and generators. For a few locations, the installation of cleanouts for some existing sewer services will be needed. This will allow for the existing sewer flows to be bypassed allowing for installation of the CIPP. A small amount of jackhammering and excavation via large tractor or vactor, and possibly a dump truck will be needed to allow for this cleanout installation work. Construction Activities and Equipment The project will rehabilitate sanitary sewer pipe by trenchless means, but cleanout installation at some locations will involve some sidewalk replacement work. The equipment we anticipate will be required and the expected sound level at 50 feet includes, but is not limited to, the following: Type Noise level (decibels) Type Noise Level (decibels) Backhoe 78 Jack Hammer 89 Chain Saw 84 Flat Bed Truck 74 Compressor 80 Generator 81 Dump Truck 76 Pickup Truck 75 Vacuum Excavator 85 Source: www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction noise/handbook/handbook09.cfm Packet Pg. 129 6.7.c Sound levels from the stationary equipment above, such as generators, will reduce by 6 dBA for every doubling of distance from the equipment. Sound levels from mobile sources, such as street sweepers, will decrease by 3 dBA ever doubling of distance. Traffic limitations Highway 99 is a high volume highway and is a primary connection between 1-5, the Edmonds Hospital District, numerous residential neighborhoods and downtown Edmonds. It is desireable to complete improvements between the hours of 8:00 PM and 7:00 AM for the following reasons: • Decreased pedestrian and vehicle traffic disruption or delays • Less sewage flows to bypass • Less disruption to Swedish Hospital emergency vehicle traffic • Less disruption to nearby businesses • Increased worker and public safety Construction Noise Notice for Nighttime Operations We propose the following measure to minimize construction noise to local residents: A. CONTRACTOR shall use ambient sensitive backup warning devices. The contractor may use back-up observers in lieu of back-up warning devices for all equipment except dump trucks in compliance with WAC Chapter 296-155-610 and 296-155-615. The contractor shall use back-up observers and back-up warning devices for dump trucks in compliance with WAC Chapter 296-155-610. B. Stationary equipment, such as light plants, generators, and compressors, shall utilize noise mitigation shields, noise blankets, skirts, or other means available as approved by the Engineer. C. All truck tailgates shall be secured to prevent excessive noise from banging. The City shall notify residents within 500 feet of the project of nighttime work activities at least 7 calendar days in advance of the proposed nighttime construction work. D. Notifications shall include — at a minimum —the following information: • A description of the project • Expected nighttime noise sources • Start date and duration of the project • Noise mitigation measures to be implemented, and • 24-hour contact information for persons associated with the project. We anticipate that the construction of this project will take place between March 2016 and December 2016. The construction project manager in charge of this project is: Name Company Name Address Phone Should you have any questions, please contact me at 425-867-5309. Packet Pg. 130 6.7.c Sincerely, NAME Title Company Name Mrnrfnr of Di ikhi \A/nrUc City Pro Packet Pg. 131 2016 Sanitary Sewer Cured in Place Pipe Preiect VA .1� ��!�!!1��MI Begin ; .- . . SW E End Project West side intersection of HWY 99 and 216th u a) N O Z M N N C O R _ v CL Q . C - O_ E N K W N ,e Q- 1` K 2 P #'L W . O 1-5 Exit TTT a Attachment 2 Packet Pg. 132 6.7.c HWY b9 CI PP Project Site Aerial Photo WIN cr YIDl�.R _ `fit• � 'i�S �v �, f• ~ n r •�1If 1 fiigfeb N!/' tii -� -' , ' -•�;� t7 t 1 1o S. # ' 3 r' I f �r r O ! :rCL 01 9 �nierur . f N It ur[r;r i _� O r Cy � • r � Q cD7,1 c ` •fir. ' f d r .. ■ • ' W F� - � .'��[[!FI{ff� 1� ti ' .r • _ 2� •+fit �■•' ■� �- + • ,_ N i r +1 0f LU h� r ` +: lift i4fi r'c f'amp � r 1�rw f7'� i Ili z. ,�• � • I-; 47, Attachment 3 P L N Packet Pg. 133 6.7.c n- tnhr �l City of Edmonds Noise Variance Zoning & Vicinty Map Highway 99 (216th St. to 220th St.) N PLN20150063 1 inch = 300 feet Attachment 5 P L.N Packet Pg. 134 6.7.c Mv Y 99 Sound Check Lications a ti ; rig". L� �-* . i it et►� a r�l •�. T _ ¢� f � �r.,, I, },� pia r"ii�-�� .. 77, �Iut II , f� r f4_ IF f F r fC r �w j• ` �4' if i IrRlhllii� ' wry ••.M 1' . nF�•r i ! • a► � [6.1 ! i S Z f` t • , I + 0 .h LZ •. L � L rCr4f, T141 N "4i�li $sL � = f•'" Tea `.� � � q�* . j4V t If I 0 Ttp 41 y�. �h c: . Y W t Aeorrr+ LU At i k TI © ��I�WIf ifTffp ■�_r - y tw' N. r; f' _qS� , • A �qqrr �! a a�i t 11 C I: �yf w � i � � � Mali ��`7f `Pf�� • , ; c� �� T� ems_ ��+�}r �� ;i � r•: fir` �• .e r � 11'w' A i tii NF ' i �• p • r �q r ' -_ Attachment 6 A Packet Pg. 135 6.7.c c c g 3 4, L aci 3 aci t 3 tu ° a, a, o o a� Gi s U > a, N -a 6CU Q U OO C C U U U C 75 f0 C N = f0 O E (D N Y -a L vi p to Cr L O O L N _ L L -W ++ — O — >; O _ 7 ? T t Z, N to OA C > Cu N >- (U >. L O Cr C O � (U ++ co 4+ M 7 f0 O > C Ln N (U C Gi O 7 O U N Cu O 0 O p 'C U E N O L U U U U U Y "a "O � E H > "a N *' �o O NLn O L M M �o O �o O u 'N >tw O +�+ U M U "a G > ++ OA > a 7 v, fO ° E >, r M M O 'in CuLn 0 C O p N ` O 0i `� v C C LOD v E N � W IS L v= V) 3 c c v Cr L 5� c Cr L >• O CJ tw Cu O N UJ w ww iJ W �p C O L r > C ,L ,L = C = Q• C t OJ O.. C GJ O O t 7 L O N N O) C IZ 4+ N N N CL +' Q +' U E 4-E L U " o Q I? J N O Q 0 0 00 N_ oA WZ N_ > N fw0 N M Co l0 0) Ln r-I L tO LO lO Ln lO l0 > Q °n° x n 0000 000 0000 0000 0000 Co �o Ln Ln Cn ICT Rt 1* Ln O (U E Co ON 7i N O 7i Ln n O N N M c'n N N N N M N N N N N N N N C LL O E Ln Ln H Ln 7! 7 O It O N C r-I N N M N N N rl N N N N N N N N Eb N Co Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln r-I r-I ri r-I r-I r-I r-I e-I O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N r-I r I ri rrH ri ri r-I r-I C O ' 6 r I N M Ln W I" 00 U 0 J Q L) C R O d W O Z d In O a O CL N M N C O r R v .Q Q a c O a E (D x w a� a R x W r C O E t L) Cu Q Attachment 7 PLN20150063 Packet Pg. 136 6.7.c OJ N a) N 0 m L 00 O m o E Q. L]D j i E Q c � Q C f6 L a) C f0 c c 0.Ln c >- O . C C a O U o O X a)O U r O a) O_ (A (A 0) IAO C O. jUp O a N Cn O U O C m O E L OD C in m C U i a Ln O U 0 a U i 0 Na) LA " -0 o N o OD L •6 C Q � X w -C a) a C OO L C L E ou L C C L C 0) C L N$ •X E m Cu N ar N .r .X w E m N •X ++ w Cu Q a W m a C L U a) a a C a W _ m Cu Q m 61 p M 0 ° v N 0 p m m a) (U u C > L 0) L �a m> Cu u C L m > 0) a) v U C +, CUD �, N E a LA > c N N a E H a, v v m w a) t ar a) t c a a� ,n a) m +' a) O a) Z Q N m 000 Y U M + a) X al fl m a) 0 t m al +' X OA C C X v a N -0 _ m v N m CL a) ao 7 m L O C ++ > -p Y v L .0 O 4+ C L o C ++ N a) p N m L 5 m p. > N Ld aJ a) m L 0 C m +� y ai m -0 c a) E tai E +� 0 C a) t E E °' o >- •U > — 0 3 C> v> •U — O > •U (D N f L to C N s N al N N aJ C a1 `� O OD L C N N a) C a) s N Cu Ln L to C U X +_' Q •p u C 0 CL '� N Ln - n E u C 0 •O fl. ;o 4N c C a) a Cu ��, C C a a) 'n 'Ln Q a) O � a fO a 'N Q a) N aj a a) a C m m Y u a <n L O a) L +' C C O +, U m .N C _a m m Y U a) L r_ C a G L 3 O a C> m Cu L 7 O OD C N a' '� O 12 LCL _E •C O OO O C O a) O t C U C Q O CU CuC n +� Q c OU c +� a) N n '++ c OU �` Q `� 0 N p, `n N-0 + O t .2 p• N N ++ Gi a) - U Q — p O Ln 5 Oc N lea .m 0 v O Cr— � 0 = 3 Cu v E O t +' 4 m> M Cr— 4- o E O c — 3 ami r— m umi Cu a, m v N L ,n L p ++ m m •� N L H L v C o t N N 3 'O C A N Cr a) O O fn n L a) C .0 o Uf N 7 a N O C N 0 N .3 L a y,,, L L `J L 16 U` — O O. C N O N 7 j' N Cu Q 7 0 a) c E_ C 4+ a ,� Q O m N E= C4,=` c E E 4 Q +� a C m iy un OU v m a r o O a m OU V a 0 m O U > m fl. N U H N .� m a N Q y m a m - . w 41 r Q a E — o O °c +1 +, — O 14 Cr E m o ea C `—° '� d C to o m L ,Fu o f C 'M N o c c bD C E 'Co Ln O .N O Y Ln Q > O � Ln O .� -O Co C 4+ r>o L U a) ++ >. O O O C ++ L - >' U a) C }, m L = N L bD m-0 a) O0 U 3 N � m- L W : N Cu N Y N 00 N L N h y cu ate-+ N N QJ O L ON +L+ O L +�+ N H N 7 C o u E 0> u m -0 O C H N 3 C 0> U O U E F•- N 7 C Cu C O N N a0 O 00 Ot n 0) NO n n ko n lD LD 1l- lD _n a m m O C) ul 00 14 m u1 m N a 1� 00 n a) v J a C O _ o rl O Ln 00 00 r- n 00 00 n N C a) L Y U � L U U E 3 O U L ~ o E n 3 a) m to V) p a .r E Y N C L Q Q CoG7 Q W E +� C Co Co U 0 U m � a) (7 U U a E e-I N m iF V) lD 00 Qj N m N N C O m C1 .Q Q Q C O (D K W N Q m K W C N E t V m a+ Q Packet Pg. 137 N 0 z 0 ao!a Z aw Otoo J w z Fow =O W ?Aa (aoueuip.ap asioN pasodoad : Z£ZZ) uoi;eoilddV uoi}duaax3 aldwex3 :;uauayoellV DO 7 z O LU 50 F- o = Z w az F W U w W Ly Q W m of L a LL m F_ Z Z J 0 ~ ❑ Z F- Z (n F- z z W wp rn= z 00 O W Q Uw } Nm rSZ w M a � to 0 F- a m �Z O �� w w a IWO a z o <0 w Hz awZE w =O zz ~ :12 a3tn 2 0E- tY U~ W a Cl) fYZ O a Z 2 O ^2 LL z W W Q a OO_ UJ ¢W Wa0 d FI CLti W F- U Q ,w �F-W fn Z: J QFo W W❑ rWJ W 0W m F H=CE � d 0w El) a0Ew 0 HO0wa Wva a u<W F¢ z � CV rri V rn l0 Z2 .—Im. - m� x co ao o a E �o U CV J d Q o O to o W CL N to Y S� J . a� 0 � Q c � m W J ?�E 0 0 to a Z 0 V P U 5 LL cc cc LL ■ Z LU Q J o L) o O VI ~ c W F O is Q Z W o. a V Z� 0o m d a m 0 0 m Q W O U) w C LL LU a N ¢ m O i UG Z cn a � 0 � m o C Q U W Y d o J � Qm c tV W M (� T) J W 3 = � W � 0 � N J w 0 c, U w = Ea a w0 m RRR" a N O z z a U ui U W c O r z w Z w o = o b to O U d N z_ n ❑ tV Q a W d a z w c a a eu o m � U J LLJ r 0 d F a sm'd r m N T LL f ZS W m m m m a � q 0C9J a W LU y W W W Z z t-V. KY O w W �0t7F-w00 J? a J W z= m w iL a iL 0 W 0 a K (03ueuip.10 asioN pasodoad : Z£ZZ) uoi;eoilddV uoi}duaax3 aldwex3 :;uauayoellV � z i W) w LU U. LL O M O m 11 V N � .o,Nr u W w w H G zF W z w LL � g _ JpQp_ W �W �o 7 S V 2Q CS o _ ui j 0 W W Ua < xZi Ww J imp a m G NJa _ � z O LU W Z V xNw N �C 30 W J i iC LU (D W 0 o ryZ V M N wa zo x o N IL V it m m m N fl 8 W to V) z LL LL - .0 x a x a x IL x a x a y o wy. K a w g CD � - p�p O N ZedZ �STSS�5j z UQm Qi:3 V N N F ONz_ 000 N a _N a 0 N W COI 0 w`ww imp w I z IX w ,.w>1= IL §21a C N N J W [zjQV� G x w 2QQ w Z � N� aN Zcoo U.REIY 7 J w 7 7 W Ir w w S v co m w 1 � o g J II v �, m J 0 z W c a = z Z a x w 9 E c o w g w o w S m W V �i 00 ILN J a IL lu It F w w 0 O ILN WG a IL p Y p Ol F Z � N =o � SN Q g � is ow � g 0ug 2 2 Z z LO pp 7 wO� K Wx w`0 J 0 N W q a W � J c7 9 z Z a �7 �j �v QW !Jg Ww LL SWOd Z o z g S w m C j N N w U 0a. Q z o H o N W x zW g w Z OJ S Q x p O z O QO z O Z Q 0 N CS1 0 Z0 LU O w W 0 Y W o z 3 w,* 5 a V J<< W W Z W 2 N Z Q Q LU N W i N co W z 0 O F CZ-7 y XX ' O W m > J W0 o W N Q Z cV !+s K LO Rd 0 a w ui F— J [L 0 V+ �0 V W Z J Z U) 4 z g J F z 0 u ci n a 9 S v In 0 0 z _ 2 J W p� C7 y Z uj �j� S lu n. IL IL IL J WWV C 7 M h� yW� p 10 171 a ® g ZS U w 0. N 6.7.d Public Works Department Engineering Division Policy Number: ENG-PM-xxxx-xx Effective Date: xxxxx Issued/Revision: Original Subject: Night and Weekend Work, Public Approved: Works Projects Purpose: This policy outlines the level of effort and criteria required for granting administrative permission to allow public works construction activities during nights and/or weekends in accordance with ECDC 5.30.100. Procedures: For Citv or Citv-sponsored Proiects The granting of administrative permission by the Mayor shall be based on a written request from the responsible department managing the activity for the City. Administrative permissions may be granted by the Mayor or his/her designee only where a clear public interest can be demonstrated. Administrative permission can be granted by the Mayor or his/her designee to City construction projects when the overall public interest is best served by doing so. Factors to be balanced include: Public convenience — Will the work result in significant delays to vehicles, pedestrians, and other non -motorized traffic if done during the day and within the hour restrictions set out in ECDC 5.30? Public Safety — does working at night significantly improve safety conditions for the traveling public and/or construction workers? Public exposure — What will be the setting for any proposed night time work? Is it located on an arterial street or in a mostly residential area? Public cost — Does a limited amount of authorized night work save the public significant cost compared to daytime work? Appropriate Mitigation - Have all reasonable steps been taken to reduce the impact of any necessary night time noise? Answering this question needs to include evaluation of (1) limiting the night time work to only that necessary to reasonably mitigate the issues identified above, (2) use of quiet generators and quiet pumps (as available), (3) drilling and placing of piles instead of driving them, as well as use of other techniques, design choices, and acoustic control equipment and strategies necessary to minimize the night-time impacts from construction noise. If the Mayor decides to grant administrative approval to a City or City -sponsored project to conduct night time construction work he/she will notify the City Council (typically via e-mail) and the affected public (e-mail, social media, signage, etc.) of that decision before commencing the work. Example Application: Attached Formatted: Underline r 0 a� v 0 d Y L 0 t Z N L 0 U d c m E t tv a Packet Pg. 140 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Public Hearing on the 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (30 minutes) Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Engineering Preparer: Katie MacCaul Background/History On July 11, 2017 staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning, and Public Works committee and the item is scheduled for a Public Hearing and further discussion on July 18, 2017. Staff Recommendation Submit the 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan to Department of Health and adjacent water purveyors for review. The goal is to have the Plan adopted by the City Council as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan in November/December of this year. Narrative The water system plan is an update to the City of Edmonds' (City's) December 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan, which received Washington State Department of Health (DOH) approval in February 2011. The City is required to update and submit a water system plan to DOH for review and approval every ten years in accordance with current drinking water regulations. Prior to January 2017, the plan update and approval period was six years. The purpose of this updated plan is to meet the State's regulatory requirements and to provide the City with a useful working document to guide the planning, scheduling, and budgeting of water system improvements. This updated plan will also be used by City staff to help maintain the water system to ensure both existing and future customers are provided with a safe and reliable supply of drinking water and fire protection. The planning period for this water system plan is 20 years. Water System Overview The City's municipal water system started in 1928 and has grown over the years as the City expanded and annexed more areas. The City's water system provides service to approximately 80 percent of the population within the City limits of roughly 10,177 metered water service connections. The other 20 percent of the City's population receive water service from the Olympic View Water & Sewer District, which is located within the southwest portion of the City limits. All water supplied to City customers is currently purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District (AWWD) and is conveyed through a single metered connection near the northeast corner of the water system. The City also has the capability to serve a portion of its system with water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), but currently maintains this source of supply and the single metered connection on standby. Water purchased from AWWD originates from the City of Everett Sultan River source. Water supplied by SPU originates from SPUs Tolt River source. Packet Pg. 141 7.1 The City's water system has seven pressure zones with two supply stations, 17 pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations, two pressure relief stations, one pump station, more than 139 miles of water main, and 11 emergency interties with adjacent water systems. Water storage is provided by four reservoirs that have a combined capacity of 7.5 million gallons (MG). Water System Analysis and Planned Improvements The existing water system was analyzed to determine its ability to meet current water system regulations and the City's own policies and design criteria. Several analyses were performed to evaluate all components of the water system under both existing and future water demand conditions. The results of the analyses were used to identify and size improvements for the water system. Staff will use this ranking in the future years to identify which improvements will be made each year to provide the City with the flexibility to coordinate water main projects with street or other utility projects that may be planned for the same area. There may also be times when the priority ranking for a replacement may change due to subsequent main breaks, increased demands due to developments happening earlier than anticipated or other circumstances that require replacement sooner than planned. Financing for Planned Water System Improvements The need for improvements to the water system is almost entirely due to aging infrastructure that has reached the end of its useful service life, is undersized and unable to meet current requirements, or has some other existing system deficiency. The improvements identified in this plan have been sized to meet both current needs and future growth within the system. Improvements identified for the next six years (2017-2022) are estimated to cost approximately $18.9 million, which results in an average expenditure of approximately $3.15 million per year (in 2016 dollars). A financing plan has been developed for funding the planned improvements and ongoing operations and maintenance, while paying down debt. The financing plan is based on the City's preference to fund capital improvements from cash reserves without incurring new debt. The improvements will be funded through a combination of cash reserves from system reinvestment, rate revenues, and new water service connection general facility charges. Ongoing water rate adjustments are necessary to provide sufficient revenue to support water system operations, maintenance and replacements. The financing plan is based on the City's recently adopted water rate adjustments for 2017 through 2019 and projected adjustments for future years. Attachments: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan Edmonds WSP City Council Public Hearing 7-18-17 Packet Pg. 142 ■ Comprehensive Water System Plan Agency Review June 2017 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 144 7.1.a COMPREHENSIVE WATER SYSTEM PLAN CITY OF EDMONDS AGENCY REVIEW June 2017 w 3r, !� o �� r ,7d v � w" +a 44255 �4k `QISTSIL0 {- i ��s;OIYAL I Prepared by: MURRAYSMITH, INC, In association with: FCS Group, Inc. 15-1662.405 1Packet Pg. 145 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 146 7.1.a City of Edmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan Table of Contents Chapters Page ExecutiveSummary...................................................................................................................ES-1 Chapter1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 Water System Description......................................................................................... 2-1 Chapter 3 Land Use and Population........................................................................................... 3-1 Chapter4 Water Demands.......................................................................................................... 4-1 Chapter 5 Policies and Design Criteria....................................................................................... 5-1 Chapter 6 Water Source and Quality.......................................................................................... 6-1 Chapter 7 Operations and Maintenance...................................................................................... 7-1 Chapter 8 Water System Analyses.............................................................................................. 8-1 Chapter 9 Water System Improvements ..................................................................................... 9-1 Chapter10 Financial Plan.......................................................................................................... 10-1 Tables Page Table 1-1 Water System Ownership and Management.............................................................. 1-1 Table 2-1 Water Main Summary by Diameter........................................................................... 2-9 Table 2-2 Water Main Summary by Material............................................................................ 2-9 Table 3-1 Historical Population and Future Projections............................................................ 3-4 Table 4-1 Average Annual Metered Consumption and Service Connections ............................ 4-2 Table 4-2 2014 Largest Water Users.......................................................................................... 4-3 Table 4-3 Historical Supply and Per Capita Demands............................................................... 4-4 Table 4-4 2014 Demands by Pressure Zone............................................................................... 4-5 Table 4-5 Metered Supply and Consumption Comparison........................................................ 4-6 Table 4-6 2014 Estimated Distribution System Leakage........................................................... 4-6 Table 4-7 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs)........................................................................ 4-7 Table 4-8 Peak Day Demands and Peaking Factors................................................................... 4-9 Table 4-9 General Fire Flow Requirements............................................................................. 4-10 Table 4-10 Future Water Demand Projections........................................................................... 4-11 Table 4-11 Future ERU Projections........................................................................................... 4-13 Table 7-1 Water System Operations and Maintenance Organization Chart .............................. 7-2 Table 7-2 Personnel Certification............................................................................................... 7-3 Table 7-3 Preventative Maintenance Schedule........................................................................ 7-10 Table 8-1 Water System Operations & Maintenance Organization Chart ................................. 8-1 Table 8-2 Personnel Certification............................................................................................... 8-3 Table 8-3 Five Corners Pump Station Capacity Evaluation....................................................... 8-4 Table 8-4 Existing Storage Capacity Evaluation........................................................................ 8-6 Table 8-5 Future Storage Capacity Evaluation........................................................................... 8-7 Table 8-6 Fire Flow Analysis Summary................................................................................... 8-11 Table 8-7 Existing (2014) System Capacity Analysis.............................................................. 8-13 i Packet Pg. 147 7.1.a Table 8-8 20-Year (2034) Projected System Capacity Analysis .............................................. 8-14 Table 9-1 Water System Improvements Completed Since 2009................................................ 9-2 Table 9-2 Water Main Unit Costs for Construction................................................................... 9-6 Table 9-3 Water Main Improvements Priority Ranking Criteria ............................................... 9-7 Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Ranking — Sorted by CIP Number .................... 9-8 Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Ranking — Sorted by Total Points ................... 9-11 Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects.......................................................................... 9-15 Table 9-7 Planned Improvements Implementation Schedule ................................................... 9-20 Table 10-1 Historical Financial Performance 2010 — 2015....................................................... 10-2 Table 10-2 General Facility Charge Calculation........................................................................ 10-7 Table 10-3 Water Utility Capital Improvement Program......................................................... 10-10 Table 10-4 2016-2022 Annual Capital Fund Cash Flow.........................................................10-10 Table 10-5 Summary of Projected Financial Performance & Revenue Requirements ............ 10-12 Table 10-6 Water Rate Forecast............................................................................................... 10-13 Table 10-7 Affordability Test................................................................................................... 10-14 Figures Page Figure 2-1 Existing Water System............................................................................................. 2-14 Figure 2-2 Existing Water System Hydraulic Profile................................................................ 2-15 Figure 2-3 Service Area and Adjacent Water Systems.............................................................. 2-16 Figure 3-1 Comprehensive Plan Map.......................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 9-1 2010 - 2017 Water Main Improvements.................................................................. 9-21 Figure 9-2 Proposed Capital Improvements.............................................................................. 9-22 Appendices Appendix A Agreements Appendix B Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) Form Appendix C Water System Facility Data Appendix D Consistency Statement Checklist Appendix E SEPA Checklist Appendix F Water Use Efficiency Program Appendix G Water System Construction Standards Appendix H Cross Connection Control Program Appendix I Fire Code Appendix J Annual Water Quality Report Appendix K Coliform Monitoring Plan Appendix L Water Ordinances Appendix M Agency Review Comments ii Packet Pg. 148 7.1.a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview and Purpose This water system plan is an update to the City of Edmonds' (City's) December 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan, which received Washington State Department of Health (DOH) approval in February 2011. The City is required to update and submit a water system plan to DOH for review and approval every ten years in accordance with current drinking water regulations. Prior to January 2017, the plan update and approval period was six years. The purpose of this updated plan is to meet the State's regulatory requirements and to provide the City with a useful working document to guide the planning, scheduling, and budgeting of water system improvements. This updated plan will also be used by City staff to help maintain the water system to ensure both existing and future customers are provided with a safe and reliable supply of drinking water and fire protection. The planning period for this water system plan is 20 years. Water System Overview The City's municipal water system started in 1928 and has grown over the years as the City expanded and annexed more areas. The City's water system provides service to approximately 80 percent of the population within the City limits of roughly 10,177 metered water service connections. The other 20 percent of the City's population receive water service from the Olympic View Water & Sewer District, which is located within the southwest portion of the City limits. All water supplied to City customers is currently purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District (AWWD) and is conveyed through a single metered connection near the northeast corner of the water system. The City also has the capability to serve a portion of its system with water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), but currently maintains this source of supply for emergencies only and the single metered connection on standby. Water purchased from AWWD originates from the City of Everett Sultan River source. Water supplied by SPU originates from SPUs Tolt River source. The City's water system has seven pressure zones with two supply stations, 17 pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations, two pressure relief stations, one pump station, more than 139 miles of water main, and 11 emergency interties with adjacent water systems. Water storage is provided by four reservoirs that have a combined capacity of 7.5 million gallons (MG). 15-1662 Page ES-1 J Packet Pg. 149 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Water Supply and Water Quality The City's purchase of water from AWWD is on a wholesale basis and subject to the terms and conditions of the water supply agreement that has been in place since 1978. A new agreement was negotiated in 2010 extending the wholesale supply agreement through January 1, 2055. The City also negotiated a new agreement with SPU in 2011 for long-term standby supply for emergency purposes through December 31, 2061. The City signed an interlocal agreement with the City of Lynnwood in 2015 providing supplemental water supply for emergency purposes. The City's primary supply of water is produced at the source by the City of Everett (Everett), then supplied to AWWD, and finally supplied to the City. Everett is the regional supplier of water to a majority of water systems in Snohomish County. Everett's source of water originates from the Sultan River and fills Lake Chaplain, where it is drawn and treated at the Everett Water Filtration Plant. The water also receives chlorine disinfection within the AWWD system prior to being supplied to the City. Water quality is routinely monitored within the City's system and has been good in the past with no water quality concerns. Past Water Usage and Future Water Demands Total annual water usage within the City's service area peaked in 2003, at a time when the City was supplying an average of 3.65 million gallons per day (MGD). Since 2003, total annual water usage has decreased at the same time that the number of water customers has moderately increased. Total water supply to the system averaged 2.92 MGD in 2014. The average per capita water demand within the City's service area from 2009 through 2014 was 95 gallons per day per person. This represents a reduction of roughly 9 percent when compared to the average water demand of 104 gallons per day per person that was presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for the years 2003 through 2008. The reduction in water usage in terms of both total annual water supply and average day demand per person over the last several years is due to the success of the City's past conservation efforts, replacement of old water mains, and the detection and repair of water main leaks. Additional reductions in per capita water demand are expected in future years, but not likely at the same rate seen in recent years. Future reductions from water use are expected from ongoing replacements of old water main and the continued implementation of water use efficiency measures (previously referred to as conservation measures), both at the local and regional levels. Growth of customers within the City's existing service area will have the largest impact on overall water demand during the next 20 years. At the end of the 20-year planning period, the estimated amount of additional water demand from planned growth will represent an increase between approximately 5.5 and 14 percent, depending on the amount of future water use reductions from the continued water use efficiency program efforts. 15-1662 Page ES-2 J Packet Pg. 150 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Operations and Maintenance The City's Water Division is staffed by several well -qualified personnel that are certified to operate and maintain the water system, as required by law. The City provides ongoing training opportunities for staff to comply with the State's certification requirements and to develop the skills necessary to ensure a dependable supply of high -quality drinking water is available to customers at all times. The Water Division is currently staffed with seven full-time personnel consisting of four field technicians, one water quality technician, one meter reader, and one lead supervisor. The Water and Sewer Manager and Public Works Director both allocate a portion of their time to the Water Division as well. The Water Division has been able to operate the water system and meet past regulatory requirements for public water systems. However, the increasing needs of the water system, combined with the additional demands of now having a consistent waterline replacement program and additional needs due to regulatory requirements, has created more challenges in completing planned preventive maintenance activities. Therefore, the City's Water Maintenance and Operations Division is planning to add at least one additional staff member in the near future to ensure continued compliance with regulatory requirements and the increasing needs of the system. Water System Improvements Completed Since 2010 The City has completed several water system improvement projects since the last water system plan was completed in 2010. These include several projects that replaced old and undersized water main, improvements to the Five Corners Pump Station, and pressure reducing station replacements. Water System Analysis and Planned Improvements The existing water system was analyzed to determine its ability to meet current water system regulations and the City's own policies and design criteria. Several analyses were performed to evaluate all components of the water system under both existing and future water demand conditions. The results of the analyses were used to identify and size improvements for the water system. Planned improvements include the following, which are detailed in Chapter 9: Water Main Improvements o Primarily replacement of existing water mains due to their age, pipe material, and need to provide more fire flow. • PRV Station and Pressure Relief Improvements 15-1662 Page ES-3 J Packet Pg. 151 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY o Replacement of PRV Stations #13, #14, #15, #16 (CIP Nos. PRV 1 through PRV 4) o Annual PRV Station Improvements Program (CIP No. PRV 5) • Facility Improvements o Five Corners Reservoir Improvements (CIP No. F1) o Yost Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement (CIP No. F2) o Seaview Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement (CIP No. F3) o SPU Intertie & Emergency Intertie Improvements (CIP No. F4) • Other Improvements o Pressure Zone Conversion (325 to 486) (CIP No. Ml) o Comprehensive Water System Plan Update (CIP No. M2) Financing for Planned Water System Improvements The need for improvements to the water system is almost entirely due to aging infrastructure that has reached the end of its useful service life, is undersized and unable to meet current requirements, or has some other existing system deficiency. The improvements identified in this plan have been sized to meet both current needs and future growth within the system. Improvements identified for the next six years (2017-2022) are estimated to cost approximately $18.9 million, which results in an average expenditure of approximately $3.15 million per year (in 2016 dollars). A financing plan has been developed for funding the planned improvements and ongoing operations and maintenance, while paying down debt. The financing plan is based on the City's preference to fund capital improvements from cash reserves without incurring new debt. The improvements will be funded through a combination of cash reserves from system reinvestment, rate revenues, and new water service connection general facility charges. Ongoing water rate adjustments are necessary to provide sufficient revenue to support water system operations, maintenance and replacements. The financing plan is based on the City's recently adopted water rate adjustments for 2017 through 2019 and projected adjustments for future years. 15-1662 Page ES-4 J Packet Pg. 152 7.1.a CHAPTER 1 I INTRODUCTION Background and Purpose The City of Edmonds' (City) existing Comprehensive Water System Plan, dated December 2010, was approved by DOH in February 2011. This plan must be updated and submitted to the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) every ten years in accordance with the regulatory requirements contained in WAC 246-290-100. The purpose of this updated plan is to meet the current regulatory requirements for water system planning and provide useful planning information that will guide the City in operating, maintaining, and improving its water system. Water System Ownership and Management The City of Edmonds is a municipal corporation that owns and operates a public water system within its corporate boundaries. Water system data on file at the DOH for the City is shown in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Water System Ownership and Management Information Type Description System Name City of Edmonds System Type Group A -Community -Public Water System County Snohomish County System ID Number 225004 Owner Number 1683 Address 7110 210th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026-7219 Primary Contact 425-771-0235 Owner Contact Jim Waite, Water/Sewer Manager Overview of Existing Water System The City's municipal water system started in 1928 with the construction of new water facilities and the acquisition of a private water company that was serving central Edmonds for many years. The City's water service area has grown over the years as the City expanded and annexed more areas. In 2014, the City provided water service to more than 10,177 customer accounts within an area of approximately 7.1 square miles. All water supplied by the City is purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District 15-1662 Page 1-1 June 2017 Packet Pg. 153 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION (AWWD) and is conveyed through a single metered connection near the northeast corner of the City's system. The City also has the capability to serve a portion of its system with water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) and conveyed through a single metered connection near the southeast corner of the City's system, but currently maintains this supply facility on standby. Water purchased from AWWD originates from the City of Everett Sultan River source and is sold to AWWD on a wholesale basis. Water supplied by SPU originates from SPUs Tolt River source. The City's water system has seven pressure zones with two supply stations, 17 pressure reducing stations, two pressure relief stations, one pump station, more than 139 miles of water main, and 11 emergency interties with adjacent water systems. Water storage is provided by four reservoirs that have a combined capacity of approximately 7.5 million gallons (MG). Summary of Plan Contents A summary of the plan and organization of content is provided below: • Executive Summary: Summarizes the key elements of this plan. • Chapter 1 - Introduction: Provides an overview of the City's water system, the objectives of the plan, and the plan organization. • Chapter 2 - Water System Description: Presents the water service area, describes the existing water system, and identifies the adjacent water purveyors. • Chapter 3 - Land Use and Population: Presents related plans, land use, and population characteristics. • Chapter 4 - Water Demands: Presents historical water use patterns, existing water demands, and projected future demands. • Chapter 5 - Policies and Design Criteria: Presents the City's water service policies, water system operation policies, and water system design criteria. • Chapter 6 - Water Source and Quality: Describes the City's water source and the results of past water quality monitoring. • Chapter 7 - Operations and Maintenance: Describes the City's water system operations and maintenance program. • Chapter 8 - Water System Analyses: Presents the results of the water system analyses and summarizes existing system deficiencies. 15-1662 Page 1-2 J Packet Pg. 154 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION • Chapter 9 - Water System Improvements: Describes the water system improvements that resolve existing system deficiencies, estimated costs of improvements, and a schedule for implementation of the improvements. • Chapter 10 - Financial Plan: Summarizes the financial status of the City's water utility and presents a program for funding the water system improvements. • Appendices: Additional information and plans that supplement the chapters listed above. o Appendix A - Agreements o Appendix B - DOH Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) Form o Appendix C - Water System Facility Data o Appendix D - Consistency Statement Checklist o Appendix E - State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist o Appendix F - Water Use Efficiency Program o Appendix G - Construction Standards o Appendix H - Cross -Connection Control (CCC) Program o Appendix I - Fire Code o Appendix J - Annual Water Quality Report o Appendix K - Coliform Monitoring Plan o Appendix L — Ordinances Definition of Terms Definitions for terms used in this plan are provided below. Consumption: The volume of water used by the water system's customers, based on customer meter records. The volume is measured at each customer's connection to the distribution system. Cross -Connection: A physical arrangement that connects a drinking water system with anything other than another drinking water system with the potential for a contamination of the drinking water. Demand: The quantity of water required from a water supply source over a period of time necessary to meet the needs of domestic, commercial, industrial, and public uses, and to provide enough water to supply fire fighting, system losses, and miscellaneous water uses. Demands are normally discussed in terms of flow rate, such as million gallons per day (mgd) or gallons per minute (gpm), and are described in terms of a volume of water delivered during a certain time period. Types of demands discussed in this plan include: • Average Day Demand (ADD): The total amount of water delivered to the system in a year divided by the number of days in the year. 15-1662 Page 1-3 J Packet Pg. 155 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION • Peak Day Demand (PDD). The maximum amount of water delivered to the system during a 24-hour time period of a given year. • Peak Hour Demand (PHD): The maximum amount of water delivered to the system, excluding fire flow, during a one hour time period of a given year. Peak hour demand usually occurs during the same day as the peak day demand. Distribution System Leakage (DSL). The annual amount of water calculated from the difference between the measured amount of water supplied into the system and the measured amount of water taken out of the system for consumption and other authorized uses. Authorized uses include both metered and unmetered water uses. Water use that is unmetered must be estimated to be classified as an authorized use. Examples of common unmetered water uses include the use of hydrants for flushing, fire fighting, and construction. The calculated DSL volume consists primarily of water loss through leaks in the water system, but may also include meter inaccuracies, meter reading errors, water theft, and reservoir overflows. Equivalent Residential Units (ERU's): One ERU represents the amount of water used by one single family residence for a specific water system. The demand of other customer classes can be expressed in terms of ERU's by dividing the demand of each of the other customer classes by the demand represented by one ERU. Fire Flow: The rate of flow of water required during fire fighting, which is usually expressed in terms of gallons per minute (gpm). Head: A measure of pressure or force by water. Head is measured in feet and can be converted to pounds per square inch (psi) by dividing feet by 2.31. Head Loss or Pressure Loss: A reduction in pressure caused by pipeline wall friction, bends, physical restrictions, or obstructions as water moves through a pipeline. Hydraulic Elevation: The height of a free water surface above a defined datum; the height above the ground to which water in a pressure pipeline would rise in a vertical open-end pipe. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL: The maximum permissible level of contaminant in the water that the purveyor delivers to any public water system user, measured at the locations identified under WAC 246-290-310. Potable: Water suitable for human consumption. Pressure Zone: A portion of a water system that operates at a common hydraulic elevation Purvey An agency, subdivision of the State, municipal corporation, firm, company, mutual or cooperative association, institution, partnership, persons, or other entity owning or 15-1662 Page 1-4 J Packet Pg. 156 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION operating a public water system. Purveyor also means the authorized agents of such entities. Supply: Water that is delivered to a water system by one or more supply facilities, which may consist of supply stations, booster pump stations, and wells. Storage: Water that is "stored" in a reservoir to supplement the supply facilities of a system and provide water supply for emergency conditions. Storage is broken down into the following five components that are defined and discussed in more detail in the plan: operational storage, equalizing storage, standby storage, fire flow storage, and dead storage. Water Service Connection Fee: A one-time fee paid by a property owner when initially connecting to the City's water system. This fee pays for the new customer's equitable share of the cost of the existing system. This fee offsets the costs of providing water to new customers and recognizes that the existing water system was largely built and paid for by the existing customers. Abbreviations The following abbreviations are used in this plan: ADD: Average Day Demand AWWA: American Water Works Association AWWD: Alderwood Water and Wastewater District CCR: Consumer Confidence Report CIP: Capital Improvement Program City: City of Edmonds DOH: Department of Health DSL: Distribution System Leakage EPA: Environmental Protection Agency ERU: Equivalent Residential Unit fps: feet per second GMA: Growth Management Act gpm: gallons per minute MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level MG: Million Gallons MGD: Million Gallons per Day mg/l: milligrams per liter PDD: Peak Day Demand PHD: Peak Hour Demand psi: pounds per square inch SDWA: Safe Drinking Water Act SPU: Seattle Public Utilities WAC: Washington Administrative Code 15-1662 Page 1-5 J Packet Pg. 157 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 158 7.1.a CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Introduction This chapter describes the City of Edmonds' (City) existing water system and provides a brief discussion of adjacent water systems. Included is a discussion of the water service area, water service agreements, and all existing water system facilities. The evaluation of the existing water system is presented in Chapter 8. Water Service Area City History The City was incorporated in 1890 with the original town site encompassing approximately 550 acres. The original town site is now occupied primarily by the downtown and adjacent residential areas. The City has expanded in area through annexations to approximately 8.9 square miles. Continued growth during the 1940's and 50's resulted in a more active role of the municipality in providing water, sewer and streets for the residential and commercial expansion. The Port District was formed in 1948 and began waterfront improvements. Commercial and retail businesses within the downtown area provided a wide range of services to the community. Completion of Interstate 5 and increased growth in the Puget Sound region led to a gradual change in the character of Edmonds, with more emphasis on residential development and a decline in the retail importance of the downtown. The City is now primarily a residential community. The rate of population growth has been relatively stable over the years with a major increase between 1950 and 1970 from 8,016 to 23,700 due to annexations. Between 1990 and 2000, the population expanded to 39,515 due to annexations in the southern portion of the City. Since then, the City's population has grown to approximately 39,950 in 2014. Approximately 80 percent of the City's population receives water service from the City. The remaining 20 percent receive water service from the Olympic View Water & Sewer District (OVWSD), which is located within the southwest portion of the City limits. Water System History The original water system was established by the Edmonds Water Company in the late 1890's. Water was supplied from local springs and wells. The Edmonds Spring Water Company acquired the Edmonds Water Company shortly thereafter. The first large reservoir, a 300,000 gallon concrete tank, was constructed in 1921 near Ninth Avenue and Main Street. The City began acquiring and building its own municipal water system in 1928, beginning with a 500,000 gallon steel water tank and two wells. The City struggled with 15-1662 Page 2-1 J Packet Pg. 159 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION water shortages and poor water quality from their groundwater sources through the 1950's and 60's. In 1966, the City contracted with the City of Seattle for a new water supply. A transmission main was extended from a new supply meter at the King County — Snohomish County boundary line through the Ballinger area, north of the City storage tank near Five Corners. The City also signed a water supply agreement with Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD) in 1966 to supply water to the City through a metered connection at the intersection of 168' Street SW and 62nd Avenue West. The City abandoned the wells and springs after completion of the new supply sources. Since 2000, the City has supplied the entire water system exclusively with water from AWWD, while maintaining the Seattle metered supply connection as a standby source of water for emergency use only. Topography The City's water service area is located in a relatively hilly portion of southwest Snohomish County. The highest elevation in the City is in the southeast corner at over 450 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The topography of the City's service area generally slopes downward, from east to west, toward Puget Sound, with the exception of the southeast corner of the service area that slopes down towards Lake Ballinger. Retail Water Service Area The City's retail water service area boundary is within the City limits and defined by the City limits, except for the southwest portion of the City that is served by OVWSD, as shown in Figure 2-1, Existing Water System. These limits are generally defined as the area extending north to Meadowdale Beach Park, south to 244t' Street SW along the Snohomish/King County boundary, and west to the Puget Sound. The eastern boundary of the City limits generally follows Olympic View Drive, 76t' Ave West, and Highway 99, except for a small portion of the City bounded on the west by Highway 99 and Lake Ballinger to the east between 220t' Street SW and 244t'' Street SW. Satellite System Management A Satellite Management Agency (SMA) is defined as a person or entity that is certified by the Department of Health to own and/or operate more than one public water system without the necessity for a physical connection between such systems. The City provides water service to all customers in its water service area. Currently, no small water systems exist within the City's water service area. The areas adjacent to the City's water service area boundary are currently served by relatively large, public water systems that are unlikely to become future satellite water systems. 15-1662 Page 2-2 J Packet Pg. 160 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Water Service Agreements The City has entered into a long-term agreement with the AWWD for the purchase of water on a wholesale basis. The City also has an agreement with OVWSD for OVWSD's supply of water to customers within the City limits. The City has emergency intertie agreements with Seattle Public Utilities and the City of Lynwood for the supply of water during emergency events. A summary of these agreements is presented below and copies are contained in Appendix A. Water Supply Agreement with Alderwood Water & Wastewater District This 2010 agreement provides for the wholesale supply of water from AWWD to the City of Edmonds until January 1, 2055, at which time it can be renewed by mutual agreement of both parties. The agreement consists of several sections that address water supply, master metering, area of use, water quality, wholesale rate calculation, future facility acquisitions, and several other elements. A copy of the agreement is contained in Appendix A. Emergency Intertie Agreement with Seattle Public Utilities The December 31, 2011 agreement between the Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) and the City of Edmonds allows the City to use water through the metered connection to the SPU transmission system for emergency purposes, including fire flow. The agreement is for a fifty-year term, expiring on December 31, 2061. A copy of the agreement is in Appendix A. Interlocal Agreement with City of Lynnwood for Emergency Interties The March 2015 agreement provides for supplemental water supply for emergency purposes through five emergency intertie connections between the two water systems. The agreement addresses obligations, billing for water used, ownership, administration, and other elements. It also provides the locations of interties along with infrastructure information. 1985 Agreement with Olympic View Water District This agreement provides for water supply from the OVWSD to customers located within the Edmonds' city limits and the boundaries of OVWSD, subject to the terms and conditions as outlined in the agreement. A copy of this agreement is contained in Appendix A. Also included in Appendix A is a copy of the OVWSD franchise agreement and an interlocal operating agreement between the City and OVWSD. 15-1662 Page 2-3 J Packet Pg. 161 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Existing Water System Facilities A description of the City's existing water system facilities is provided in this section. The analysis of these facilities is presented in Chapter 8. General water system facility data is summarized on the Department of Health Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) form, which is included in Appendix B. More detailed water system facility information is contained in Appendix C. Pressure Zones The City's topography varies from sea level along the west side bordering the Puget Sound, to approximately 455 feet along the eastern City limit. The terrain generally slopes from east to west, toward Puget Sound. This wide range of elevation requires the City to either reduce or increase pressures in certain areas such that sufficient water pressure and fire now are available throughout the system. This has been accomplished by dividing the water system into seven different pressure zones, as shown in Figure 2-1. The pressure in each zone is regulated by reservoir levels, pressure reducing station settings, pump station settings, or a combination of these, as illustrated in the hydraulic profile, Figure 2-2. Overview All water supply to the system is from the Alderwood Supply Station, which supplies water directly to the City's highest pressure zone, the 596 Zone. All other pressure zones receive water from the 596 Zone through a control valve at the Five Corners Reservoir site or through pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations. A more detailed description of the City's pressure zones follows. 596 Zone The 596 Zone is the City's largest zone, which includes customers in the central and eastern portion of the City. The 596 Zone is a closed zone, which is a pressure zone without gravity storage. Primary supply to the zone is from the Alderwood Supply Station, which functions as a pressure regulating facility to maintain pressures in the 596 Zone. Pumped water storage is provided for the 596 Zone, utilizing the Five Corners 3.0 MG and 1.5 MG Reservoirs and the Five Corners Pump Station. The 596 Zone can also receive water on an emergency basis from five manually operated emergency interties with the City of Lynnwood, which are located along the eastern boundary of the service area. Ground elevations vary throughout the 596 Zone from approximately 270 to 455 feet. 505 Zone The 505 Zone supplies water to customers in the central and northern portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from the 596 Zone through five PRV stations, including PRV 15-1662 Page 2-4 J Packet Pg. 162 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Stations 10, 13, 14, 15, and 24. These stations reduce the pressure of the water to maintain adequate pressures throughout the 505 Zone. Ground elevations vary throughout the 505 Zone from approximately 195 to 365 feet. 0014re,- The 500 Zone supplies water to customers near the northern portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from the 596 Zone through two PRV stations (2 and 5). Ground elevations vary throughout the 500 Zone from approximately 180 to 400 feet. 486 Zone The 486 Zone supplies water to customers in the central and southern portion of the City. The primary supply of water to this zone is from the Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir, which floats on the zone and establishes pressures throughout the zone. The Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir is filled with water from the 596 Zone through a control valve on the inlet piping system of the reservoir. Supplemental water supply to the 486 Zone is provided by two PRV stations, which receive water from the 596 Zone. These PRV stations, 16 and 17, are normally not open and are set to supply water during fire now events and other high demand situations when pressures drop in the 486 Zone. The 486 Zone can also receive water on an emergency basis through three manually operated emergency interties with OVWSD. Ground elevations vary throughout the 486 Zone from approximately 170 to 375 feet. 425 Zone The 425 Zone is the smallest zone with customers near the north portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from the 596 Zone through two PRV stations. These PRV Stations include 8 and 9. Ground elevations vary throughout the 425 Zone from approximately 175 to 285 feet. 420 Zone The 420 Zone supplies water to customers in the central portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from two PRV stations, one receiving water from the 596 Zone (PRV Station 23) and the other receiving water from the 486 Zone (PRV Station 18). Ground elevations vary throughout the 420 Zone from approximately 155 to 250 feet. 325 Zone The 325 Zone is the second largest pressure zone and supplies water to customers in the western portion of the City and adjacent to Puget Sound. The primary supply of water to this zone is from the 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir and 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir. Both reservoirs float on the zone and establish pressures throughout the zone. The Seaview Reservoir is 15-1662 Page 2-5 J Packet Pg. 163 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION supplied with water from the 505 Zone through a control valve at the reservoir site. The Yost Reservoir is supplied with water from the Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir in the 486 Zone through a control valve at the reservoir site. Supplemental water supply to the 325 Zone is provided by four PRV stations, which are supplied by three different pressure zones, including two from the 500 Pressure Zone (PRV Stations 3 and 6), one from the 486 Pressure Zone (PRV Station 20), and one from the 425 Pressure Zone (PRV Station 7). These PRV Stations are shown in Figure 2-2. These PRV stations are normally not open, but are set to supply water during fire flow events and other high demand situations when pressures drop in the 325 Zone. The 325 Zone can also receive water on an emergency basis through a single, manually operated emergency intertie with OVWSD. Ground elevations vary throughout the 325 Zone from approximately 10 to 245 feet. Supply Facilities The City is supplied with water through the Alderwood Supply Station and maintains a standby emergency intertie with SPU for supply during emergency events. Alderwood Supply Station The City currently supplies the entire system with water purchased from AWWD, which in turn purchases the water from the City of Everett. The original source of the water is the Spada Reservoir, in the headwaters of the Sultan River (roughly 30 miles east of Everett). The Alderwood Supply Station is located in the City's 596 Zone at the intersection of 168th Street SW and Olympic View Drive. The supply station is a below -grade concrete vault, which receives water from AWWD's 635 Zone through a 24-inch transmission main. The station contains a 12-inch mainline meter and control valve and an 8-inch supplemental meter and control valve. The station includes a remote telemetry unit and is connected to the City's telemetry system through leased telephone lines. Modifications to the station were completed in 2010 to increase capacity of the supply facility, as planned in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan. Seattle Public Utilities Emergency Intertie The emergency intertie with SPU is a below -grade concrete vault with a single 20-inch inlet pipe, 20-inch outlet piping, a 12-inch flow meter, and a 12-inch control valve that connects SPU's 592 Zone with the City's 596 Zone. The facility was originally used for primary supply to the south portion of the City's water system, prior to the City supplying the entire system with water purchased from AWWD. The facility is currently used by the City as an emergency intertie, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 2011 agreement with SPU. 15-1662 Page 2-6 J Packet Pg. 164 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Water Treatment All water purchased by the City is treated before entering the City's distribution system. The City does not provide additional water treatment. Water purchased from AWWD is treated by the City of Everett's water filtration plant, located adjacent to Lake Chaplain. This plant provides filtration, chlorination and fluoridation. Additional chlorination is provided by AWWD at AWWD reservoir sites. Water treatment of the SPU supply is provided by the Tolt Treatment Facility, located near the South Fork Tolt River. Seattle provides filtration, ozonation, chlorination, and fluoridation at this facility. Pumping Facilities Five Corners Pump Station The Five Corners Pump Station is located at the same site as the Five Corners 1.5 MG and 3.0 MG Reservoirs on the north side of Bowdoin Way, west of the Five Corners intersection at 2121h Street SW and 84th Avenue West. The Five Corners Pump Station was constructed along with the Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir in 1978 on the same site. The primary purpose of the station is to pump stored water from the Five Corners reservoirs to the 596 Zone for fire flow and during peak demand periods to maintain a relatively steady supply through the Alderwood Supply Station, thereby minimizing large fluctuations in supply being demanded from AWWD. Improvements to the pump station were completed in 2010 and included replacement of pumps, valves, piping and variable frequency drives (VFDs). Control modifications were completed in 2016 that allow the station to operate in either pressure or flow control modes. The pump station contains two end -suction centrifugal pumps with 60 horsepower motors, each designed to pump 1,195 gpm at 130 feet total dynamic head. The station was designed with space for a third pump in the future. A standby engine generator at the site provides backup power supply to ensure the pump station is operational at all times (i.e., in the event of a power failure). Storage Facilities The City's water system has four reservoirs with a total combined storage capacity of approximately 7.5 million gallons. Two reservoirs (325 Zone 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir, 325 Zone 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir) provide storage to the 325 Zone and the two other reservoirs (Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir, Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir) provide storage to the other pressure zones. A more detailed description of each reservoir is provided below. 15-1662 Page 2-7 J Packet Pg. 165 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 325 Zone 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir The 325 Zone 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir is located at Seaview Park, which is south of 184' Street SW at approximately 901h Ave West. The 119-foot square buried concrete reservoir was constructed in 1975 and provides approximately 15.0 vertical feet of water storage with an overflow elevation of 325 feet. The reservoir is filled with water from the 505 Zone through 8-inch inlet piping with an 8-inch flow meter and 8-inch control valve. The reservoir provides supply to the 325 Zone through its 12-inch outlet piping. 325 Zone 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir The 325 Zone 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir is located at 9537 Bowdoin Way, near the southern end of the distribution system. Similar to the Seaview Reservoir, the Yost Reservoir is a 119-foot square buried concrete reservoir. The reservoir is located beneath tennis courts at Yost Park. The reservoir was constructed in 1973 and provides approximately 15.0 vertical feet of water storage for the 325 Zone with an overflow elevation of 325 feet. The reservoir is filled with water from the 486 Zone Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir through 8-inch inlet piping with an 8-inch flow meter and 8-inch control valve. The reservoir provides supply to the 325 Zone through its 18-inch outlet piping. Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir The Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir is located just west of Five Corners at 8519 Bowdoin Way. The welded steel, 80-foot diameter reservoir was constructed in 1960 and provides water storage for the 486 Zone. The reservoir has separate 10-inch inlet piping that is elevated to the roof of the tank and 10-inch outlet piping. The reservoir is filled with water from the 596 Zone through 10-inch inlet piping with a 10-inch flow meter and 10-inch control valve. Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir The Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir is located on the same site as the 1.5 MG Reservoir at Five Corners. The welded steel, 104-foot diameter reservoir was constructed in 1979 and provides pumped water storage for the 596 Zone via the Five Corners Pump Station and gravity storage to the 486 Zone. The reservoir has separate 10-inch inlet piping and 10-inch outlet piping. The reservoir is filled with water from the 596 Zone through 12-inch inlet piping with a 12-inch flow meter and 8-inch control valve. Distribution System The City's water distribution system consists of approximately 136 miles of water main ranging in size from 4-inches to 24-inches in diameter. Most of the distribution piping is comprised of ductile iron water mains (61 percent), followed by cast iron water mains (38 15-1662 Page 2-8 J Packet Pg. 166 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION percent). Table 2-1 summarizes the water mains throughout the City's distribution system by diameter and total length of each size. Table 2-2 provides a summary of the City's water mains by material type and total length of each. Table 2-1 Water Main Summary by Diameter Pipe Diameter (Inches) Total Length (miles) Percent of Total (%) < 4 1.80 1.33% 4 12.0 8.88% 6 37.3 27.5% 8 64.4 47.5% 10 2.03 1.50% 12 13.8 10.1% 14 0.18 0.13% 16 1.02 0.75% 18 0.31 0.23% 20 0.99 0.73% 24 1.82 1.34% Totals 135.7 T- 100% Table 2-2 Water Main Summary by Material Pipe Material Total Length (miles) Percent of Total (%) Cast Iron 51.7 38.1% Ductile Iron 82.3 60.6% HDPE 1.19 0.90% PVC 0.19 0.10% Other 0.32 0.20% Totals 135.7 100% The City has an ongoing comprehensive leak detection program, established in 2002, to identify and eliminate water system leaks. The program has included the use of private leak detection services and City staff for locating and identifying leaks. All leaks discovered have been repaired. This system -wide leak detection program is ongoing to ensure that leaks are detected early and promptly repaired. The City's annual water main replacement program has targeted replacement of older water mains, which are typically responsible for most of the leaks. Water main improvements planned by the City are identified in Chapter 9. 15-1662 Page 2-9 J Packet Pg. 167 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION PRV Stations Pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations are connections between adjacent pressure zones that allow water to flow from the higher pressure zone to the lower pressure zone by reducing the pressure of the water as it flows through the station. PRV stations maintain a desired range of pressures in the lower zone. A PRV station is typically a below -grade concrete vault containing two pressure reducing control valves, piping, and other appurtenances. The control valve hydraulically varies the flow of water through the station to maintain a constant pressure on the downstream side of the valve as water flows into the lower pressure zone. PRV stations are placed in water systems to function in one of two ways. First, they can serve as an active supply facility by maintaining a continuous flow of water into a lower zone that has no other source of supply. The PRV stations serving the 505 Zone, 500 Zone, 425 Zone, and 420 Zone are this type. Second, a PRV station can serve as a standby supply facility by providing fire flow or emergency water supply. In this scenario, the main supply to the zone is from another source (e.g., supply facility or reservoir). This type of PRV station does not typically open to provide flow until the lower, or downstream, zone experiences a significant drop in pressure. Only then will the PRV station become active and allow flow into the lower zone. The PRV stations that supply the City's 486 Zone and 325 Zone are this type. The City's water system has a total of 17 active PRV stations, as shown in both plan view (Figure 2-1) and profile view (Figure 2-2). Since 2010, eleven new PRV stations have been constructed, where most of these are replacements of existing, older PRV stations. All the City's PRV stations are in below -grade concrete vaults. A listing of all PRV stations and related data is contained in Appendix C. Pressure Relief Facilities Pressure relief stations are installed in pressure zones supplied with water from a higher pressure zone or a high-pressure source. A pressure relief station typically consists of a below - grade vault housing a pressure relief valve, piping, and other appurtenances. Pressure relief stations protect the zone that it is installed in by discharging water out of the system when pressures in the zone increase beyond the set point of the pressure relief valve, thereby maintaining safe pressures in the zone. The pressure relief valve is normally closed and opens when the pressure in the zone increases beyond the set point of the valve. The valve opens and hydraulically varies the flow rate through the valve to limit the maximum pressure on the upstream side of the valve. A common application for a pressure relief station is to protect a pressure zone from high pressures when a pressure reducing valve in a PRV station fails in the open position and allows high pressure water to enter the lower pressure zone. As an alternative to installing standalone pressure relief stations, pressure relief valves can be installed within PRV stations on the lower pressure zone side of the pressure reducing valve. 15-1662 Page 2-10 J Packet Pg. 168 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The City has two standalone pressure relief stations in the 325 Zone. One is located in the northern portion of the zone and the other in the southern portion. The pressure relief facilities protect the 325 Zone from high pressures in the event of a "stuck open" valve failure of any of the 325 Zone PRV stations, since the originally installed PRV stations in the 325 Zone were not equipped with pressure relief valves. To further improve pressure relief in the 325 Zone and other pressure zones, the City has installed pressure relief valves within most of the recently constructed PRV Stations (#2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #17, #18, #23, and #24). A pressure relief valve is also located within the Five Corners Pump Station to provide pressure relief for the 596 Zone. Water System Interties Water system interties are physical connections between two adjacent water systems that are normally separated by a closed isolation valve or control valve. Interties function as either a normal supply facility or an emergency supply facility. The City's Alderwood Supply Station is considered a normal supply intertie and the SPU Supply Station is considered a standby supply intertie. These interties are operated and maintained according to the previously discussed interlocal agreements. Emergency supply interties provide water from one system to another during emergency situations only. The City's five interties with the City of Lynnwood and six interties with OVWSD are considered emergency interties. These emergency interties are all normally closed and manually opened in the event supply from Alderwood Water District is disrupted or a portion of the system is affected from one or more water mains that are out of service. Telemetry and Supervisory Control System The City's telemetry and supervisory control system records water system data and provides automatic control of all supply, storage, and pumping facilities. The City's telemetry and supervisory control system also provides instant alarm notification to operations personnel in the event of equipment failure, operation problems, or other emergency events in the system. A summary of the City's telemetry and supervisory control system at each water system facility is provided below. All facilities are linked to the City's master telemetry unit at the operations facility via leased telephone lines. • Alderwood Supply Station: Monitors and records flow rate and pressure. Remote control of the control valve settings. Seattle Supply Station: Monitors and records flow rate and pressure. Remote control of the control valve settings. • Reservoirs: Monitors and records water level, chlorine residual, and reservoir fill rates. 15-1662 Page 2-11 J Packet Pg. 169 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION • Five Corners Pump Station: Monitors and records suction pressure, discharge pressure (596 Zone), and flow rate. Adjacent Water Systems The area outside and immediately adjacent to the City's existing water service area is served by several public water systems, as shown in Figure 2-3. The following provides a brief description of each adjacent water system. Alderwood Water & Wastewater District The AWWD provides direct retail water service to the cities of Brier and Mill Creek, portions of the cities of Bothell and Mukilteo, and unincorporated areas of southwest Snohomish County. The AWWD also provides wholesale water service to the cities of Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood, similar to Edmonds. The AWWD purchases all water supply from the City of Everett. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the City and the AWWD. City of Seattle/Seattle Public Utilities The SPU direct water service area is located to the south of the City. SPU receives its water supply from the Cedar River and Tolt River watersheds. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the City and SPU's direct service area. Olympic View Water & Sewer District The OVWSD is located to the south of the City and provides water service to a population of approximately 14,500 people as of 2014. The OVWSD service area includes the Town of Woodway, part of the City of Edmonds, and a portion of unincorporated Snohomish County. Most of OVWSD's water supply is purchased from SPU, though it also maintains its own sources. The OVWSD has six emergency interties with the City, as previously discussed. The emergency interties are located at: Intersection between Pine Street and Chinook Road, between OVWD 353 Zone and the City's 325 Zone. • Intersection of Elm Place and 7tn Avenue S, between OVWD 415 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. • Intersection of Birch Place and 7th Avenue S, between OVWD 415 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. 15-1662 Page 2-12 J Packet Pg. 170 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION • Intersection of 8th Avenue S and Elm Way, between OVWD 505 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. • 220th Street SW, at approximately 7th Avenue S and 9th Avenue S, between OVWD 505 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. • Intersection of 76' Avenue W and 224' Street, between OVWD 540 Zone and the City's 596 Zone. No future interties were identified in the District's most recent Comprehensive Water System Plan, as of January 2015. However, a potential future emergency intertie could be installed near the intersection of 236' Street SW and Highway 99 where the City extended a 12-inch water main stub to the west side of the highway approximately 10 years ago when the highway was re -paved. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the City and the District. City of Lynnwood Lynnwood is located to the east of the City and provides water service to a population of more than 36,650 people as of 2014. Lynnwood purchases all of its water from the AWWD There are five manually operated emergency interties between Lynnwood's 573 Zone and Edmonds 596 Zone. The emergency interties are located at: • Intersection of 208' Street and 76th Avenue W. • 20910 Highway 99. • Intersection of Olympic View Drive and 1801h Street SW. • Intersection of Olympic View Drive and 73rd Avenue W. • Intersection of 68th and North Meadowdale Beach Road. There are no current plans for additional interties between Lynnwood and Edmonds and there are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the two systems. City of Mountlake Terrace The City of Mountlake Terrace (Mountlake Terrace) is located to the east of Edmonds and provides water service to a population of approximately 21,090 people. Mountlake Terrace purchases all of its water from the AWWD. Mountlake Terrace's 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan identified one future emergency intertie with the City. The emergency intertie would be located near the intersection of 226th Place SW and 73rd Place West, providing an emergency supply of water from the Edmonds's 596 Zone to the Mountlake Terrace 494 Zone At the time of this writing, the planned emergency intertie has not been constructed. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the two systems. 15-1662 Page 2-13 J Packet Pg. 171 )V FDA, FIGURE 2-1 G � u Comprehensive Water System Plan Existing Water System murraysmith June 2017 Legend 0 Emergency Intertie Existing Water Mains: ° Pressure Reducing Station 325 Zone Water Main N 0 2,000 Scale in Feet Pressure Relief #4 / ' 151 ST ST 1515T ST SW 1 RO x 5 a ¢3 ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT STSW 58TH ST 3 so/ — °i _ lo - .. �s"DI PRV #3� a -DI F4 o° sT y1 b P 1-2, Future Emergent Intertie with City TH ST SW TH 6"DI rs, Lynnwood 573 Zc p fiS=H Supply froi =J {■ PRV #2 g'°/ 3 = Alderwoor Water Distri s (635 Zone PRVT,,, Q m ,68TH ST SW m ED Pump Station 420 Zone Water Main _ — — _ _ _ Ej Reservoir 425 Zone Water Main #5 Vx- � � Supply Station �A`�� , °1S 15T61 W fiGl �06• 486 Zone Water Main .:� 9AWNPL RDST IMP°°IA „W Sr 0 Pressure Relief Facility 500 Zone Water Main Imo'- a"DI SW m 6"01 1>3RDSTS _ 17fN° eo p V PRV #7TH STSW �� eb 173RD 1)4TH ST SW / 1]4TH �Tw ® Zone Valve (Closed) 505 Zone Water Main 6°°I yT �� 6"DI 6•M �° C I/ °' REDERIGKPL H5T5W ST Q-: 24"DI o m �� m Og��l _ _ City of Edmonds Retail Water 596 Zone Water Main Y NO e PRV#8 6TH6ST SW g"C,�jg„DI '2 ]6TH LTISN(_ ^ '— ! Service Area /� ,� - 75TH PLSW �� w _ Pressure Zones: �! �pU'S _ _ a < sr` I Other Water Service Areas //� "BT" ° G, PLSW fc ,TBTH "ao;5 _ ti177THPLSW a+ 325 Zone l9TH PL w q PLSw STSW /� 6"CI - m PLSN� City Limits --' 420 Zone 6"CI C, O 179 DR m� w V/ ■ ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary OLYMP\GN\WW o g..D °\ 9 6°\ - 180TH p 180TH TSW 6,DI a L- 425 Zone m 2 a PC SW , 8 H _ ° I ,BOTH ST SW ,81ST PL SW I 486 Zone �/ o �� 3 ~ z m SW m Pp°\ N ,a1ST PLSW = c g„D1 %� 1 181STSTSW ,82N0 - i , T L W I 181ST PL SW SW 1SIST PL I 182ND ST SW "CI (� > 500 Zone /i • � � gg35W - v1 ^6 o rx- m12"CI a F SW 182NO ST Sw .yq"D\ �pGE WY � A 182N°PLSW 183RD '♦ ° PL m '� 12"cl m 194T STS rm O w , 9NP�v 183RD PL SW "I'° PI Sw E Note: Water main labels indicate 505 Zone I,4 % a _ 12"DI w PRV #10 I _ Emergency Interties a O the pipe diameter and material. 596 Zone /j o <Seaview 6GI "Rese�r�v/+gjr PRV #13 _ a>THPLSW U 's 1ssT sT w u - - '°i - STsw o `' a^D, - with City of Lynnwood U /% _ / 6"DI g., m �� aSLH ST Sw 573 Zone asTH PLsw° d. ti r bG IYLV) / `O 187TH PL SW - 8"DI m 6"DI ,8]TH STSW I I TH ST SW `•. 186TH ST Sw 0 ' S'.DI _, ciPRV #140 _ S..DI W - ^ L ;D PRV #24 fV yda� e. a 8..DI ,88TH ST SW 8"CI r 187TH PI _ m DI O m8"DI 8"DI P RV #9 18]THPL `� ^ o- - N m n 188TH PL SW PL PENNY LN ~ ��AATER • ST SLAKE PL AA w _ 8'DI 189TH PL SW _ 5 8"DI m .`° 189TH PL �'SSL 'BOTH PL SW m O CHERRY ST ,901N _ F- ,91ST PL SW "� S,t\ 1e "''IN ^ �R 190TH ST SW s° r 5 190TH ST SW i91 'i 8"DI m 192ND ST SW PL SNF 9 ° _ 191ST PL SW 19, ST PL v rsrsw SSW esTSTsw .L RTH STRFgM PRV#15�_ 0 SIER BOTH 12"DI Ra 6CI 6"CI 192ND PL SW J ~ 3V pAL IT PL 192ND P193RO Q% LN // 6'° ^� CITY OF _ " 193RD A4LW o SW —NO SW Q�' PARKW PL SW m �� ti Z ° ` RIFT 0.4 s0 - EDMONDS Tsw PLsw > ¢ 6"CI - 193RD 9P SW 8"DI 8"DI V //• • P °OO CN - G s0 Q °Q- W tO - S 194TH SAi CI S - a 8 DI a u �' q'(H ST S W TTII''--II I ~ 19 I , �'P�4TH ST SW' _ U GHT CN P u g e t ME ODY �yE s0 196TH ST SW 8"CI 4"CI 8"CI m —J8" g•.CI v _ _ m m _ 8 p mw r Il15TH ST SW N- W 96TH ST SW 8"CT 9]OH . 9�TH P 9fiTH STS 524 ¢ 0"HDP E w S o u n d m 8"DI o Hpyo b ,� 8••0l wm _ - O° ro 33o STSW 4 z.�m a SW o m 19ITH - PL - ? li —'11J I7 N a'D g°'° m;a HVHZ . 6'GI PRV #23.c1 a"DI x 3 - —_ H �y 6"cl r ' ,98TH ST SW S/y 6'0 v /6"CI o m 4 CI PRV i m m u m g 6"CI a_ 6"D, I m . r m c n ,99TH STSW a, 1'98TH PL S.W CITY OF / Pressure Relief#19 �7 SATE LN VIGT'CI g•'CI A PL - z naOL� #16 _ o 200TH ST G " - w 6"DI 6"CI ° 2DOTH ST sw LYNNWOOD_p IOPTH Sr sw 20,ST ST SW VISTAPL ¢IL ALOHAT m OUNTA, 11 - - m 201ST q„ ^' Q `= °j 8"DI 2015T ST SW _ �201STa P� PL w F a CAI201 - 4"CI ®4"CIN L fi"DI PLSW 2. 2NO PL SW 202ND ST SW m _ 8 D1 ¢201ST PL SINE FFF ¢ BC/ e\ 1 8"CI GLEN ST x 8-DI z w GLEN S/ y - 1 - 'll a20 D m 202ND PL SW 203RD ST SW 3 202ND ST SW o _ 3 r ¢ y J m Di 4 CI 6 _ O y ' ` 6CI 6•G\ m 2 4T n PLSW a..DI 8"DI m DALEV ST Vol - 4"CI U m Ei o IT SON B' °\ 3 Z0 4rH ST SW 204TH ST SW 204TH ST ED SPRAGUESR - w SPR AGUE Si - 6"CI - _ 05TH PLS o O — L 0 - - 23 IONDS ST I'DI .' EDMONDSST - DP,,GND T rG; - PRVB#18,-° fi'CI _ - o - m o Z Vol ^ s W S..DI - Emergency Interties Lq f� x r e 0 n° g,Dl pp. GI P,R, a"DI o m - b with d wi City of Lynnwood } I - V IS 'DI 6. "i 8 M MAIN ST 8' #17 8 DI 0 ry f O F 5 w a12 Q 573 Zone - y U 1 cI DAVTON �, U a M 8"CI V 8"CI �� 208TH SW PL o W Cl 11 ' '� n s✓ ,2"GI MAPLE6T Yost ,2"CI 6"DI U� QI 6..D1 p 0 fi 6"CI Reservoir Five -Corners - 0-\(1.5 `Reservoirs 209TH STSW r sir DI _ f Bg�,DI W —+-1 I 208TH STSW -� -, r— _ `✓ �P e•GI DEaTr DI W ue D, MG) and 2,orH ST w°I 210T3ST SW fi'DI _ wALN UT ST 8"CI CI 10 D d SH�c, Pump Station <g•.CI P ■y*°` O��P ■0.� A� P. Q _ ° _ HOLLY DR m 9G q, (3.0 MG & n �F P6 - ~ 211THSTSW UNION o m GIJ4 Cl CEDAR ST 8 DI .• 12"CI 1:5 MG) . I � 8 "CI 8"DI 8"CI G ,zrH E ° l0 O 2 DI SP T o 4 W Cl e OIN 8'•cl s C\ ,2n W„ - Z w `° a 213TH STSW U - STSW -s ter W VZ°l A S..R �. LAUREL LN _ Plo 4 Cl m 92 UN° Lp .. 8 DI _RFI LI AI > u 214TH PLSW °J e F 3 N Jam 1p„ BCI C/ 214TH PLSW 214T PL SN! W m w13TH PL sw 65 < li ^ti0 D OR ° W SEAMONT LN PIN 8"CI fra " - 6-Cl 1"T PL s �D W m 215AH ST SW - 216TH STSW x° = " x w G 6°cl _ 215TH ST SW o o z1sTHPLsw - 215TH S T SW 6"CI a ,f W Sr SW r Q N POINT ` I Emer enc Intertie g I Q °, e"DI m w m �� - 9T�W Io 21T'4 �'N 6 O 8"DI 215TH ST w . Ies - �ys� �216TH ST SW J•d with Olympic.VleW s - m o �21]TH STSW m Fb m 'm' _ 6•(„ \4 WY 12"D1 ✓ Qci Water District I �01 i a Woodway 353 Zone 11 o a= V W ^P 6"DI m 6"DI 219 H S SN/ - SP�,O / 218TH ST Sw5 C �\ 8"DI ,P o ELMST nc m o HD PE - - m ND AVEDNI D o g 219THS1,B c) T 1. s- 8"DI _ `� ~� _ 6"DI _ 12"CI r 8„DI ro o r . Ci2 OMB PL I PRV #20swW • 1 m y m- > I o 220TH ST SW 8'CI Q -- °� Emergency Interties Emergency Interties q w; '� 220TH ILL SW a 9 PL Sw 122E 220TH PL 0 . PL SW -°y` with Olympic View with Olympic View of DIRGH w �^ Q 221 ST 5U'I Q 3 PL'swW W >sTSW ST Water District °° P Water District ` --Water !y Q m i T 223RD ST t'hase a o D, a 8-DI I ° s 13rHwnvsw 505 Zone — -- - �, °O IN Q3gP -415 Zone> y 13TH WAY _• —.. 'P,yO ,4TH STSW F e w AV I 224TH ST SW= ake o ^ 223�STTM! _ x " 224TH ST SWa — -11 OD'3,. yip — ° z p 224THPLSw mQ Emer encylntertie g 2., Olympic View m `< i 224TH ST SW y 224TH m ALGGNDuw I s225rH w 224THPLSV.r with _ 22,TH a �� o _ D LN. RO I _L2a H ST SW WP m Z 226i °' -._ I ° 221TH PL SW �Q" d HPLS 226TH PL SW A ~ !y - - - - - _ I ST -225TH ry 0 --r 22�T LS / ° w PLSW `O m SW 226TH ST sW z P x 0540 LowWater Zone F w f^y a 226TH ST SW IT m m zzsTH HP .—�'; a �._2�]TH 2zsrH 3 PLSW _ m F zZSTH 1 226TH PLSW "'� ST SW SW m 22]TH PL SW ;.-- _1ZB7Y+yT sw _ 7� -. �-sw w - m x r� j `w' '� m! 12,sw �� TtisTSW .yam �TI-T� J w 228TH:PL SW ,. II I r '-F f aQ, �' 1 x 228TH ST SW P -•— r 9 ` ° e I P CITY OF MOUNTLAKE >28TH - o ,DEER DR �' t Py 229TH -1..1��' ST UNINCORPORATEDm Sw220TH rL - a STSW TERRACE I -- °NOSE -1..rv�1•.-L_. _.EDM SW SNOHOMISH - . HUSE P'D 22I HPbsw� tt 230TH w 230TH ST SN! 8"DI - WAG _ Y zzs T„ «7,r . 601 2 TSyy 3 PL SW J N 230TysT _'.' .. �: iJ -7 I6--� L_r 'S5� W I STSW COUNTY 3 5 P,29 A° o a zs,sl sl sw �2315T PL eY" `� Q �y;ST PL SW 13 a A S 1 OTN ST x3sW� im F z 4 8035 SW e / NE OLYMPICVIEW m AQ PL SWQ HOLLY LN ro ST 9,) m 232ND ST SW m 232ND TOWN 1 HDSETT RD �j . PPaP 15 WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 234TH r 1E 3 v 21zND PL 2321 WOODWAY —:_ �_—_ PLSW m L��.i4JN$$•$L"1 0 8"DI / i x NOTTINGHAM RD �234TH PL' z : ^8"DI SW � v PLS a / I SWa 104 I MADRONA LN, 3 PL3S �' m 235TH PL SW ----- ''44 ~ v�i m :a 235TH m o _ 235TH PL SW o 1,0ODHAVEN G. I m a 236TH ST SW C m I - O A 234THs FZ.jgt �1 _ PLSW 9 PLS ' iPL SW m .. ,�I'-- �" i PL 236TH PL SW x w r 'CI r m 6"CI _ Z m m H STSW t SW SW ti 23]TH PL SW t^t m 28T �'' I - - 4� m PL SW d l 1- w i 2':T 2> 235TH PL SW 236TH ST SW_ i i 238TH ST SW o; z a - x P PC yy Hq ` NT 'LA 3 a O 4x 23]T'r : f 238TH ST S'N a' T 238TSW I m 'Ia d w 3 z - _ ' _ x ,2 239TH r '- Q17 PLs 239rH .d 5 Lake T 24HTH ST sw PL m sw z4oTH sr sw / gtWP / _ BallllZg2Y . - " 24pTH ST Sl'.' 8'IDI AVE W wl yO�N\CK IN o . 240TH PL SW PL SW Sy 240TH PL SW 3 Q N l ° a z m 242ND ST z x o `� 9 ZAISTPLSW / ]9T ! w ' 0 fi"pl ` _ _ pUAIL LN n` ♦ o.w to .o = P`sw 242NDP, '°F P�2SW Standby Supply from / 42ND5 SW 8"DI f ♦ ""z aERRYLN m. Seattle Public Utilities PL SW _ 6"DI N T43RT t■ F■ ■' �N4SNOHO'M&,COUNTy �: (592 Zone) EDMONDS wy 1 W y ` W"—N f - m n e0/ ~�� 6' SI i9 Dl The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or implied, ��'�-�3r S z T as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information KING COUNTYG �•}� �.Ny4�=y displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying SEATTLE PUBLIC purposes. Notification of any errors is appreciated. NORTH C Source: City of Edmonds G S, Washington State Dept. of Health and UTILITIES DIS Snohomish County GIS (March 2016). Packet Pg. 172 7.1.a (D N N N C R a E a� U) L cu 0 i .N 0 0 L E 0 U ti r O N r C 0 E t V R r-+ r Q Packet Pg. 173 650 ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT SUPPLY (635 ZONE) ---------------- 600 596 ZONE 1 1 550 u cn a500 500 ZONE � 1 Q w m m 450 N 400 Ln wl N N IJbU 325 N 300 cn c� w �Iw NI /I �I �I wl E 0 E PRV #2 PRV #5 PRV #3 PRESSURE RELIEF STATION #4 LEGEND 596 ZONE 505 ZONE 500 ZONE 486 ZONE 425 ZONE 420 ZONE 325 ZONE ------ ADJACENT SYSTEM (ueld we;sAS aa;eM dua03 L1,OZ ay; uo 611JlaeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) Ueld W81S(S.1a}eM 8Alsu8y8adua03 L60Z :1u9wt43e11V NORTH SOUTH ■-_--�-U 1� J - CITY OF LYNNWOOD R.(573 ZONE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRV #8 T T PRV #9 PRV #6 ZONE #7 PRV #24 PRV #10 PRV #14 PRV #15 & 13 PRV #16 V PRV #17 596 ZONE OE=489' 1.5 MG RESERVOIR D I AMETER: 80' 3.0 MG RESERVOIR 37, 7 600 GAL/FT M EL:9 DIAMETER: 104' 420 ZONE I I 6� 540MGAL/FT EL:5 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIRS & PUMP STATION OE=325' 1.5 MG 1.5 MG OE=325' SEAVIEW RESERVOIRL-1104YOST RESERVOIR DI M: 119'x 1 19' PRESSURE RELIEF D I M: I 19'x 1 19' BOTTOM EL: 310' BOTTOM EL: 310' 105,924 GAL/FT STATION #19 105,924 GAL/FT - PRESSURE REDUCING STATION/VALVE N ISOLATION VALVE CONTROL VALVE PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE INTERTIE PUMP STATION OFACILITIES AT SAME SITE PRV #23 PRV #18 �i T ►A ABBREVIATIONS EL ELEVATION FT FEET MG MILLION GALLONS OE OVERFLOW ELEVATION ti 6 d m Y V cc SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES d STANDBY SUPPLY (592 ZONE) 600 550 ---------------------- OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT LOW ZONE (540 FT) ------------------- OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 900 (505 ZONE) 486 ZONE 450 PRV #20 i --------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (415 ZONE) 400 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 350 WOODWAY ZONE (353 FT) 7 ----------- 300 �-kof ED4f��' FIGURE 2-2 � .. v J v ! .7,. 18g0 Comprehensive Water System Plan Existing Water System Hydraulic Profile murraysmi7h June 2017 (ueld wa;sAS as;eM dwOO L4OZ aq; uO 6uPeaH allgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM anlsuegaidwOo L�OZ :;uGwgae;;v LO ti a m m a 7.1.a �` F.D•1grJ FIGURE 2-3 G s �"c• 1 gqu Comprehensive Water System Plan Service Area and Adjacent Water Systems murraysmith June 2017 Legend City of Edmonds Retail Water Service Area Alderwood Water District _ City of Lynnwood City of Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water & Sewer District ,L Seattle Public Utilities North City Water District City Limits ■ ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary Puget Sound �� OOPO O /', sGMFRSFrL % I.51ST ST 151ST ST SW ^59TH PL AWATERO&D WASTEWATER N DISTRICT 0 2,000 x ` ",6]TH sT sw Scale in Feet 11 �44 160THiT SW__-_________ F90 �ii � I n �/ TOTSC O 'I I62ND P,L SW 16a- ST IS,g 1fiSTH P=!M165TH PL SW AD O wO R6Q(F w ¢ 2 30�0 168TH ST SW m 4691H P( '/ SF c= o a �90 9SNPD5 <40L SW , 9(9 SEP 4 ONO x , ] "S 1]2ND ST SW,� TSTSW FBF9m 173RDSTSW 4� 1]zSNIp Sl __ ° '! TALBOT AD OS PL ,�' /z3RDSTS1J[ ? _7 173RD 174TH / 3 FREDERICK PL 175TH ST SW 1]STHP`t ST SW 174TH 5r 5 SW > � �W y➢ 1l m 176TH ST SW 'i SOON ° 176TH PL SW x �� 3------- �w 1 ]8TH PL SW 179TH PL SW /� SJNSFT 2 185TH PL SW 186TH PL S W m 16]TH ST Ew OST SW OK q CHERRY ST j9 -11S° (s N' 184TH ST SW e 185TH PLSW 187TH PL III Q m189TH PL SW y F 191STPLSW CITY OF ORRTMwTRFFMLN EDMONDS ° EXCELSIOR PL 3 R: • w yE.N Oq /NTH sF D.. 1]eTH PL sw n]TH ST SW ST sm 1� F 1]]TH PL SW a o qc� ST SW 3 o `O .. Q 1T9TH 3 _ 180TH ST SW'J (� 180TH �.,�.••- 1615T PLSW m / ^ ST SW 178TH 1815TSTSW 181 ST PL S W69K�Q 1815T PL 11 --- _� _ l b �'182ND PLSW �r �L" O > � .: WV < ' 182ND ST SW 182Np ST SN NOP 183RD ;. OGE 18Z PL SW ^,3RD PL SW 3 185TH ST SW 185TH ST SW / 185TH ST SW O ,86TH ST SW I �, 185TH ST SW �• `\ '� 186TH STSWSTH PL SW 187TH ST SW �i � i m n 186iH Sr SW w ^ 187TH PLSW 8]TH m ¢ N J s 188TH PL SW PENNY LN tO x ¢ 189TH jL. 190TH ST PL SW i Y -` 189TH PL SW 189TH 189TH PL SW 191 STP3'"': SW �' m \ /S21, 191TH ST SW 199TH CITY OF 192ND ST SW 191ST .f '1. �. PL SW r5T5W 191ST ST S/4, 3 LYNNWOOD - 192ND PL sW 192ND PL SW a 191ST ST SW a 3 O192NO PL SW193RE ML, PL SN/ PARKWy • 194TH ST SNP ^ u '1941H ST SW i 193RD ST SN/ m r.1 m 195TH ST SW 194TH ST SW l ¢ PUGET DR PUGET DO 196TH ST SW 196TH ST 5W � o I r N mPDGETWAY m 0 9fiTH5T5J524 PUGETWAY MELODVLN _ z z Sr 19]T HINDLEY LN ; .. 198THSTSW -,� NE\NZQ� �O 0YIMfRE DR VIEWLAND WAV. ygT m m EN —MERE OR 5',0 198TH ST SW tt (SW n m 199TH ST SW 198TH PL SW / O CASPERS ST ¢ 5yA m m 16 rc 72o0TH ST SW / GILTNER LN. m CPSPEP p 209TH ST SW 200TH ST SW / BATER LN VISTA PL w m w I201ST ST SW m w w VISTA P-' SW -ST ST ,O ALOHAWAY ALOHA ST w w m S oP JO i 202ND ST SW 2 ¢ ry0 CAROLWAY SIERRA PL 202ND PL SW m m 202NO PL SW x m m 202ND ST SW 4rK GLEN ST z ¢ o m m a m Sy > O GLEN ST SIERRA ST z9q 203RD ST SN/ ^ I o DgLEv PL - rysr sw 99 �'• SIBS, M ._. RAL-EY ST¢ - -- _ .. �204TH ST SW e 2T w 204TH ST SW 204TH ST S. 204TH ST SW SPRAGUE ST SPRAGUE ST NPLP &I-4C SPRAGUE ITZ ��tAO 205TH PL SW ST 1 PJ,; ; EDMONDS ST 206TH ST SW „ EDMONDSST EDIT H1G STjS _ 20fiTH ST SW �� OOPO W SELL ST BELL ST 4G m z m ; . NFD 20]TH PL SW 1 OOPO OP h . !.1-I m 1 .LLL i;I_.... .MAIN ST m A STSW DgVTON'ST� �_ ��"� L a 208TH PLSW - - - - - - 208TH ST SW PP J N MAPLE ST-T1f�:.'.� .' J ALDER ST ' T �'11' �: '�]il i m F O .. - 3 ALDER ST-' PQ- ^ 3 _ Q210TH ST SW IJ L� 10TH ST _. . a � 1 .L�!:: 4 - y J m 11 J%.IL � �-1�T{T.�. WALNUT Sr �.I�L11LI HOLLY DR 1 _ i CEDAR ST-" CEDAR ST r ^ / r w ¢ 1 yT2 CEDAR PL RO P 21 W UNIONO 3�r.. 2 WRD (O ¢ HOMELANDDR .�.�� wSPRUCE ST a SPRUCE ST q w N213TH ST SW I LAUREL LN 959E m BOIND HEMLOCK WAY x > O/ `CI 92 LAUREL WAVi A'Wgy 224TH PL SW 224TH PL 3W --./ ;k.1 13TH PLSW i ON ERBEN DR ^ LAUREL Si 214TH PL SW / by~ T F �P m 215TH ST SW 215TH ST SW x 225TH .ST $W - - R- PINE ST S -.225TH PLSW C 225TH SS SIN x � w 215TH PL SW ^ / Y /� - 5ZN ST SW r — — — `slim a_ m .. ': ; `; 's w I , zisrH PLSW 216TH ST SW FORSVTH LN 226TH ST SW ¢ 3 I �1,' . w Cl f m a = j1J / j ' 216TH ST sw 1r I= s 1, wz FIR PL v1 m P° ry FO,yO FIR PL=¢ FIRST 228TH PLSW 228TH ST SW a� > �j� OnON WV O < N a ! P \\\ _ BELLA COOLA RD g II o S�9y ELM AY ? uxHi� 'I l i' r-�1 w z z O 228TH ST SW ; 228TH ST SW5 yl y SEA 219TH ST SW -�I'Q 982N D AVEW _ 219TH ST SW 219P'` M ST CNO WHITCOMg PL I ^ �PLM ST 2-H ST SW ELM1TPL O .. $ �I o� 220TH PL SW a �-1RCHIL 2215TPTSW 1 of m w Lw QP� I i6IRCHST 4 Chase ^ 3 °o �PJHULSHAN i .� 13TH WAY S-(I-'.°' '�av m �� Fake O a 9P5 14TH ST Si/y s 13TH WAY o 1 F� 224TH ST SW a w 2234aC �T�YV• ^ ~ ,o ,� p ti m w GO°' 224TH ST SWw 224TH ST SW �� ( xw I i 224TH PLSW y 224TH AT 3 224TH PLSW 3 3 a 22aTH ST SW¢ 224TH ST SW .F m w N P, 224TH ALGONOUIN RO I �26TH^T SW a z OD LN ^G m 225TH PL SW ¢0 225TH PLSW i SO°GAO , ^ Q�. 226TH PL S� 226TH PLSW I N " m m 226TH ST SW 225TH PLSW IF 226TH ST SW w °j fyPi•+SY'L �^ ^ / ,i 226TH PL SW 'I ao m 227TH PL SW i m ti w BE o .-J _ IA� / 227TH ST SW r 228TH ST SC/ r i " I 'IST S, 3 228TH PL SW _ - _ 'IQ _ER DR 229TH PL SW Foy I UNINCORPORATED __ CITY OF I �SNOHOMISH ti wACH°SETT R° zO�I 'a 230TH ST 5W P ; MOUNTLAKE j TOWN OF OLYMPIC VIEW w COUNTY: _ TERRACE WOODWAY WATER & SEWER w s,5� 5� 5W Q e 't• 23,5TPLBw r z K �. DISTRICT - m 232ND 5T SW I SW �3o eQ z3z PLSW •-"� oP Houv LN �w 232ND sr sw m 232ND WACHUSETT ID >' NOTTINGHAM R❑ MADRONA LN 1 235TH PL 6W A m5 1N5S I m m I I 235T 3PLSW IL- 1 i m n hhh"` 2 2-1 PLSW 236TH ST SW P c �� 236TH ST SW w¢ 23- PL SW 23eTH ST sw iw 238TH ST SWx 3 Q1,SW 23]TH PL SW _ / TOTy PL W3 2PTjyq Y, ` pO NT 1 W_ i 3 I Q 23]TZ' m 238TH ST SW i F 211 238TH ST SW a / �S\ A Lake m Ballinger I ey 'O I 241TH ST Sw °� 240- ST Sw `�' N41 GK(N I 240TH PLSW "J. 2491H 5T i pvE w o n 246TH PL sw 3 3 - e°� I11I c/ I m 1- 2415T ST SIN.- ` TOTEM POLE LN a 2415T PL SW -_, �- QUAIL LN 242ND IT SW Y 241ST PL SW 9 O e 2q SN1 c' m _!SIN...,. ~ 242ND p LF' ' 242ND ST 3W 242ND ,ne zNpe� C" N a � 242ND ST 5w � r . BERRY LN mLN 243RD PL SW a -+ 1 F FOM a .. . 4 SNOHOMISH COUNTYi °MONDs° °S� u The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or implied, OITH ST 11 — - �' ■ ■ ■ ■ fM�■ f F�•� , �.Ny fi Fly a a H sT as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information KING COUNTY m f FF�� ■ •fyyy displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying SEATTLE N m m purposes. Notification of any errors is appreciated. I NORTH CITY Source: City of Edmonds CIS, Washington State Dept. of Health and PUBLIC UTILITIES WATE Snohomish County GIs (March 2016). f Packet Pg. 176 0 L E CID a� Q 0 14 V 0 C C 0 C IC (D r. 0 L 3) N N N LL 0 N V! L ch r- 0 L Q 0 U 0 N C 0 V a 7.1.a (D N N N C R a E a� U) L cu 0 i .N 0 0 L E 0 U ti r O N r C 0 E t V R r-+ r Q Packet Pg. 177 7.1.a CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION Introduction This chapter demonstrates the compatibility of the City of Edmonds' (City) Comprehensive Water System Plan (Plan) with the City's Comprehensive Plan, identifies designated land uses within the City limits, and presents population data. The City's Comprehensive Plan was originally completed in 1995 to meet the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and was updated most recently in July 2015. Compatibility with Other Plans The City's Comprehensive Plan and GMA were reviewed to ensure that the Plan is consistent with the City's land use policies. Growth Management Act The State of Washington GMA, which was passed in 1990 and amended in following years, defined four goals relevant to water system planning: 1. Focus growth in urban areas and reduce sprawl; 2. Maintain consistency between land use and utility plans; 3. Ensure adequate public facilities and services, concurrent with growth; and, 4. Designate and protect critical areas. Urban Growth Area The City is considered an urban growth area in accordance with the GMA, per RCW 36.70A.110. The City has coordinated with Snohomish County in designating its approximately 5,700-acre urban growth area (UGA). The City UGA is bounded on the south by the City of Shoreline, on the southwest by the City of Woodway and unincorporated Snohomish County areas, on the west by the Puget Sound, and on the east by the cities of Lynnwood (northeast) and Mountlake Terrace (southeast). Consistency The plans and policies of the City and Snohomish County must be consistent in accordance with GMA, per RCW 36.70A.100. The GMA also requires consistency with the implementation of water system plans and comprehensive plans, per RCW 36.70A.120. 15-1662 Page 3-1 J Packet Pg. 178 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION The Municipal Water Law, which became effective in 2003, also requires consistency of water system plans with local plans and regulations. Confirmation of consistency under this law is achieved by means of completing the Consistency Statement Checklist, which must be included with all water system plans. A signed copy of this checklist is included in Appendix D. Concurrency The GMA requires concurrency, so that adequate public facilities and services are available when growth occurs to ensure health, safety, and a high quality of life. The GMA requires that growth be located in areas already served or readily served by public facilities and services, per RCW 36.70A.110. Critical Areas The GMA requires that critical areas be designated and protected. Critical areas include wetlands, steep slopes, and aquifer recharge areas. Appendix E contains a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist that was prepared for this Plan addressing environmental issues. City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan The City updated its Comprehensive Plan, adopted in July 2015, to extend the planning horizon through 2035 and to accommodate additional people, jobs, and community needs. The Comprehensive Plan was originally prepared in 1995 to comply with the requirements of the GMA and RCW 35A.63, which covers Planning and Zoning in Code Cities. It provides policy that is consistent with Snohomish County on land use, housing, capital facilities, transportation, and parks and recreation issues for a 20-year period. The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies for planning growth and development over a 20-year planning period. The Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies to ensure that new development will be adequately served without impacting existing levels of service. The Community Culture & Urban Design Element is a new section that acknowledges the impact of community culture and design on development. The Community Sustainability Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies addressing climate change, community health, and environmental quality. This section addresses improved physical appearance, walkability, protection of natural environments, and residential characteristics. The City also developed a Climate Change Action Plan in 2010 to address accomplishments to date and identify additional efforts planned by the City to achieve a more sustainable community. Elements of this plan related to the City's water system include water conservation and rainwater capture from rooftops to reduce per capita water consumption, and implementation of capital improvements utilizing energy efficient equipment to reduce power consumption at water system facilities. 15-1662 Page 3-2 J Packet Pg. 179 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION At the regional level, the City of Everett (Everett) and the Everett Water Utility Committee (EWUC) have conducted studies to evaluate the impacts of global climate change on its water supply to ensure that the long-term planning of the region's future water supply accounts for the effects of climate change. The City is a member of the EWUC, which is an advisor to the Water Supply Forum, consisting of representatives of public water systems and local governments in the Central Puget Sound region of Washington State. The Water Supply Forum addresses current and future water supply issues facing the region and has documented the projected effects of climate change on the region's water supply situation in the Regional Water Supply Outlook, which was published in 2009 and most recently updated in 2012. Land Use The land area within the limits of the City is approximately 8.9 square miles (5,700 acres) and includes approximately five miles of marine shoreline along Puget Sound. The City is mostly built -out (approximately 96 percent developed), based on current zoning, with limited infill and redevelopment potential remaining. The City's water service area is approximately 7.1 square miles (4,532 acres) and is smaller than the city limits, due to a portion of the south area of the City being served by Olympic View Water and Sewer District (OVWSD). The City's Comprehensive Plan Map, which is included as Figure 3-1, shows the various land uses throughout the City. As shown on the map, most of the City is single family residential and includes a smaller portion of multi -family residential, mixed use commercial, and other land uses. Approximately 61 percent of the land area within the City is currently designated for single-family residential use; 6 percent is designated for multi -family residential use; 7 percent is designated for mixed use commercial use; and the remaining 26 percent is designated for other uses such as public right of ways, parks, schools, and open space. Population Household Size Trends The average household size in the City has declined over the past three decades, which is consistent with the decreasing household size trend of the nation. Average household size in Edmonds, including both single family and multi -family residences, has decreased from 2.41 persons per household in 1990 to 2.32 in 2000 and 2.26 in 2010. The average household size for all of Washington State was 2.51 persons per household in 2010. 15-1662 Page 3-3 J Packet Pg. 180 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION Existing & Future Population Population density in the City remained constant between 2010 and 2014, at 6.9 persons per acre, and increased to 7.0 persons per acre in 2015, based on Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) data. In comparison, the City of Lynnwood had a density of 5.6 persons per acre in 2015 and the City of Mountlake Terrace had a density of 8.3 persons per acre in 2015. Table 3-1 shows past and projected populations within the entire City limits, and the City's water service area, which is smaller than the City limits. From 2009 to 2015, the City's water service area population remained relatively constant, from an estimated 31,350 people in 2009 to 31,716 people in 2015, as shown in Table 3-1. The population within the City's water service area is anticipated to increase during the 20-year planning period of this Plan to an estimated population of 35,127 people in the year 2035. The population projections shown in Table 3-1 are based on the City's planning target population of 45,550 people within the City limits in the year 2035, which was developed by the City as part of the cooperative planning process for the region. The population projections for 2021, 2025, and 2035 are based on an interpolation using the City's 2015 and 2035 population values. Table 3-1 Historical Population and Future Projections Year Population Within City Limits Population Within Edmonds Water Service Area Historical 2009 40,900 31,350 2010 39,709 31,209 2011 39,800 31,286 2012 39,800 31,271 2013 39,950 31,299 2014 39,950 31,290 2015 40,490 31,716 Projected 2021 (+6 years) 42,407 32,703 2025 43,282 33,378 2035 (+20 years) 45,550 35,127 15-1662 Page 3-4 J Packet Pg. 181 7.1.a (D N N N C R a E a� U) L cu 0 i .N 0 0 L E 0 U ti r O N r C 0 E t V R r-+ r Q Packet Pg. 183 7.1.a CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Introduction This chapter summarizes past water demands and future projected water demands for the City of Edmonds' (City) system. These are used in Chapter 8 to analyze the existing water system facilities and form the basis for sizing future water system improvements described in Chapter 9. The different types of demands that were analyzed include: average day demand, peak day demand, peak hour demand, fire flow demand, and future projected demands, both with and without estimated reductions from water conservation efforts. This chapter also summarizes the City's water demand data collection and reporting procedures. Current Population & Service Connections The City provided water service to a population of approximately 31,290 in 2014, as shown in Chapter 3. The City has categorized all water customers into four different classes for billing purposes: Single Family Residential, Multi -Family Residential, Commercial or Industrial, and Government or Education. Water was provided to 10,177 metered water service connections in 2014. Of these, approximately 8,757 (86 percent) were single family residential accounts, 639 (6 percent) were multi -family residential accounts, 530 (5 percent) were commercial or industrial accounts, and 251 (2 percent) were government or education accounts. The demand analysis in the following section summarizes the past water use of the four water customer classes. Existing Water Demands Seasonal and Other Factors Affecting Water Demands The total demand of all customers will vary both throughout the day and over the course of the year for any public water system. The following factors have the greatest impact on water demands in a public water system: 1) population, 2) weather, and 3) type of customer. As population increases, the overall, long-term demand is expected to increase. Weather primarily influences short-term demands, where the higher outdoor temperatures during the summer months results in increased water usage, which is mostly due to outdoor landscape irrigation. Water usage patterns vary among different types of customers. For example, single family residential customers typically use more water than multi -family residential customers, primarily due to the outdoor lawn watering and irrigation practices of single family residences. Similarly, demands can be affected by conservation efforts targeting water reduction through smarter and more sustainable practices. 15-1662 Page 4-1 J Packet Pg. 184 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Water Consumption Water consumption is the amount of water that customers use as measured by their water meters. Table 4-1 shows past water consumption data from 2009 through 2014. While population data was known for the year 2015, there was incomplete production data and, therefore, the year 2014 served as the baseline for projections. As shown in the table, the majority of the City's overall water consumption is attributed to single family residential customers. Although more than 86 percent of the City's customers are single family residential, they only use approximately 60 percent of the total water consumed. This is due to the lower amount of usage per single family resident as compared to other types of customers. Table 4-1 Average Annual Metered Consumption and Service Connections Customer Class Year Single Family Multi- Family Commercial/ Industrial Government/ Education Totals Average Number of Connections 2009 8,683 631 519 233 10,066 2010 8,699 638 521 237 10,095 2011 8,701 639 525 244 10,109 2012 8,709 639 528 247 10,123 2013 8,733 639 531 248 10,151 2014 8,757 639 530 251 10,177 Average Annual Consumption (1000 gallons) 2009 661,637 203,992 169,676 20,789 1,056,095 2010 571,488 192,516 156,982 15,515 936,500 2011 556,556 196,711 159,685 23,083 936,035 2012 559,094 196,844 163,580 14,461 933,979 2013 582,047 192,648 173,946 24,599 973,240 2014 579,428 196,055 171,989 27,133 974,605 Average Daily Consumption Per Connection (gal/day/conn) 2009 209 886 896 244 2010 180 827 826 179 2011 175 843 833 259 2012 176 844 849 160 2013 183 826 897 272 2014 181 841 889 296 Average 184 844 865 235 As shown in Table 4-1, single family residential customers used an average of 184 gallons per day per connection. This is less than the average of 208 gallons per day per connection 15-1662 Page 4-2 J Packet Pg. 185 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for years 2003 through 2008 and less than the average consumption of the other customer types. Other customer classes are anticipated to have greater consumption per connection, since several multi -family units are often served from a single connection and commercial/ industrial customers are often the highest users of water in a public water system. Table 4-2 shows the top 20 water customers with the highest consumption in 2014. The total water consumption of these customers represents approximately 12 percent of the total consumption for 2014. Table 4-2 consists mostly of multi -family complexes, municipal facilities, and commercial properties. Table 4-2 2014 Largest Water Users Name A Address L Water Use Type Annual Consumption (gal) City of Lynnwood 17000 76th Ave W Domestic 33,660,096 Swedish Edmonds Hospital 21601 76th Ave W Domestic 15,439,045 99 Ranch Market 22511 Highway 99 #104 Domestic 10,074,764 Sterling Crest Condominiums 19515 86th Ave W Domestic 8,137,310 Extendicare 21400 72nd Ave W Domestic 4,400,790 Swedish Medical Center 21632 Highway 99 Domestic 4,106,805 Edmonds School District #15 7600 212th Ave W Irrigation 3,947,470 Park Ballinger Apartments 22924 76th Ave W Domestic 3,677,424 BCD Tofu House 22511 Highway 99 Domestic 3,564,468 Ballinger Court Apartments 22707 76th Ave W Domestic 3,316,863 Edmonds Landing Retirement 180 2nd Ave S Domestic 3,236,073 Harbor Square Athletic Club 160 W Dayton St Domestic 3,169,496 Highland Park Condominiums 500 Elm Way Domestic 2,813,424 Point Edwards HOA 45 Pine St Domestic 2,685,507 Maplewood Manor 8516 196th St SW Domestic 2,315,969 Point Edwards HOA 75 Pine St Domestic 2,307,740 Andy's Motel 22201 Highway 99 Domestic 2,259,117 Anthony's Home Port 456 Admiral Way Domestic 2,256,873 Plum Tree Plaza 22315 Highway 99 Domestic 2,237,424 Kimm & Associates 23515 Highway 99 Domestic 2,109,507 Largest Water Users Total 115,716,164 Water System Total 97404,717 Percent of Total 12% 15-1662 Page 4-3 J Packet Pg. 186 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Water Supply Water supply refers to water that is delivered to a water system. Water supply differs from water consumption in that water supply is the amount of water delivered into a water system and water consumption is the amount of water taken out of the system. For any given year, the amount of water supply will be greater than the amount of water consumption, due to water system leaks that exist in all water systems and other factors discussed below. For the City, water supply represents water that is purchased from the Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD) and delivered through the City's Alderwood Supply Station. Table 4-3 summarizes the total amount of water that was supplied to the City's system from 2009 through 2014, the average population within the City's retail water service area, the average day demand of the system, and the per capita demand for each year. As shown in Table 4-3, per capita demand varied from year to year, with an overall trend of decreasing per capita water demand. This decreasing trend is most likely the result of water conservation efforts and reflects a similar trend among other public water systems throughout the Puget Sound. The City's average per capita demand from years 2009 through 2014 is 95 gallons per day, which is less than the per capita demand of 104 gallons per day presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for years 2003 through 2008. This average per capita demand value is used later in this chapter to forecast water demands in future years, based on the population projections presented in Chapter 3. Table 4-3 Historical Supply and Per Capita Demands Year Average Population Annual Supply (1000 gallons) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Demand (MGD) Average Demand Per Capita (gal/day/capita) 2009 31,350 1,178,070 2,241 3.23 103 2010 31,209 1,067,511 2,031 2.92 94 2011 31,286 1,085,479 2,065 2.97 95 2012 31,271 1,054,815 2,007 2.89 92 2013 31,299 1,072,086 2,040 2.94 94 2014 31,290 1,065,003 2,026 2.92 93 2015 31,716 872,131 1,659 2.39 75 Average (2009-2014) 95 Table 4-4 shows the average demand of each of the City's pressure zones, based on 2014 water demand data. Almost half of the overall water system demand is within the 596 Zone and almost one-third of the demand is within the 325 Zone. 15-1662 Page 4-4 J Packet Pg. 187 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-4 2014 Demands by Pressure Zone Pressure Zone 2014 Annual Supply (1000 gallons) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Demand (MGD) Percent of Total Demand (%) 596 539,957 1,026 1.48 50.7% 505 44,730 86 0.12 4.2% 500 20,235 38 0.05 1.9% 486 80,940 154 0.22 7.6% 425 11,715 23 0.03 1.1% 420 25,560 48 0.07 2.4% 325 341,866 652 0.94 32.1% Total 1,065,003 2,026 2.92 100% Authorized Consumption & Distribution System Leakage Authorized consumption is the amount of water authorized for use. This includes water customers' usage and other authorized uses such as water main flushing, street cleaning, and permitted hydrant use. All unauthorized uses and any water that cannot be accounted for is considered distribution system leakage. In other words, distribution system leakage is an unrecorded volume of water that may include water system leaks, inaccurate supply metering, inaccurate customer metering, unknown fire hydrant usage, illegal water service connections, and unknown reservoir overflows. The Water Use Efficiency Rule, which became effective in January 2007, requires all public water systems to calculate and report annually distribution system leakage on a 3-year rolling average and as a percentage of total supply. If the amount of distribution system leakage exceeds the 10 percent threshold established by the Water Use Efficiency Rule, a water loss control action plan must be prepared and implemented by the water system. This plan will need to identify steps and timelines for reducing leakage. The difference between the amount of water supplied to the City from AWWD and the amount of metered water consumption from 2009 through 2014 is shown in Table 4-5. The table also includes the amount of other authorized water uses, annual distribution system leakage, and the 3-year rolling average of distribution system leakage as a percentage of total supply. The estimated amount of authorized uses shown in the table is from City maintenance records. The table illustrates a trend of decreasing distribution system leakage as a percentage of total supply, which likely reflects the City's implementation of a more aggressive annual water main replacement program that started in 2010. 15-1662 Page 4-5 J Packet Pg. 188 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-5 Metered Supply and Consumption Comparison Total Net Net Other Distribution System Leakage Supply Total Difference Difference Authorized Year ( 1000 Consumption ( 1000 ° as of /° Uses 1000 ( (1000 % of Total gallons) (1000 gallons) gallons) Total Supply gallons) gallons) Supply (3-yr Avg) 2009 1,178,070 1,056,095 121,976 10.35% 31,879 90,096 - 2010 1,067,511 936,500 131,010 12.27% 12,709 118,302 - 2011 1,085,479 936,035 149,444 13.77% 28,720 120,724 9.9% 2012 1,054,815 933,979 120,837 11.46% 19,716 101,120 10.6% 2013 1,072,086 973,240 98,845 9.22% 8,569 90,277 9.7% 2014 1,065,003 974,605 90,398 8.49% 3,379 87,019 8.7% Table 4-6 presents 2014 water supply and consumption data and the methodology used to calculate distribution system leakage on an annual basis, prior to the calculation of a 3-year rolling average. Table 4-6 2014 Estimated Distribution System Leakage Description Total Amount (1000 gallons) A. Total Purchased Supply 1,065,003 B. Total Metered Consumption 9174,605 C. Estimated Authorized Uses (flushing, street cleaning, permitted hydrant use) 1,456 Distribution System Leakage (A-(B+C)) 88,942 Distribution System Leakage as % of Total Purchased Supply 8.4% Amount shown for distribution system leakage may be from water main and water service leaks, meter inaccuracies, meter reading & recording errors, illegal water use, and other uses not identified above. Equivalent Residential Units The demand of each customer class can be expressed in terms of equivalent residential units (ERU's) for demand forecasting and planning purposes. One ERU is equivalent to the amount of water used by a single family residence. The number of ERU's represented by the demand of the other customer classes is determined from the total demand of the customer class and the demand per ERU from the single family residential demand data. Table 4-7 shows the number of ERU's calculated for each customer class from 2009 through 2014. 15-1662 Page 4-6 J Packet Pg. 189 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-7 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs) Year Average Number of Connections Average Annual Demand (1000 gallons) Average Day Demand per ERU (gal/day/ERU) Total ERU's Single Family Residential 2009 8,683 738,054 233 8,683 2010 8,699 651,436 205 8,699 2011 8,701 645,413 203 8,701 2012 8,709 631,429 199 8,709 2013 8,733 641,162 201 8,733 2014 8,757 633,173 198 8,757 Average (2010-2014) 201 Multi -Family Residential 2009 631 227,553 233 2,677 2010 638 219,447 205 2,930 2011 639 228,117 203 3,075 2012 639 222,311 199 3,066 2013 639 212,214 201 2,890 2014 639 214,240 198 2,963 Commercial/Industrial 2009 519 189,273 233 2,227 2010 521 178,942 205 2,390 2011 525 185,180 203 2,496 2012 528 184,744 199 2,548 2013 531 191,613 201 2,610 2014 530 187,942 198 2,599 Government/Education 2009 233 23,190 233 273 2010 237 17,685 205 236 2011 244 26,769 203 361 2012 247 16,331 199 225 2013 248 27,097 201 369 2014 251 29,649 198 410 System -Wide Totals 2009 10,066 1,178,070 233 13,860 2010 10,095 1,067,511 205 14,255 2011 10,109 1,085,479 203 14,634 2012 10,123 1,054,815 199 14,549 2013 10,151 1,072,086 201 14,602 2014 10,177 1,065,003 198 14,729 15-1662 Page 4-7 J Packet Pg. 190 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS The demands shown in Table 4-7 are based on supply data that was computed from the consumption of each customer class and the difference between total metered supply and consumption from each year. The system -wide average demand per ERU from 2010 through 2014 was 201 gallons per day, which is less than the average demand per ERU of 236 gallons per day presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for years 2003 through 2008. The 2009 demand data was not used in the average computation as it was outside the range of demands for the other years and significantly different than the following five years. The City's average demand per ERU of 201 gallons per day is used later in this chapter to forecast ERU's in future years, based on estimated future demands. Average Day Demand Average Day Demand (ADD) is the total annual amount of water delivered to a system divided by the number of days in the year. ADD is determined from the water system's historical water supply data and is used to project future system demands. ADD data is also used to determine standby storage requirements for water systems. Standby storage is the volume of a reservoir used to provide water supply under emergency conditions when supply facilities are out of service. Water supply records were used to determine the system's average day demand, which is shown in Table 4-3. Peak Day Demand Peak Day Demand (PDD) is the maximum amount of water used throughout the system during a 24-hour time period of a given year. PDD typically occurs on a hot summer day when a large amount of outdoor lawn watering occurs simultaneously with other water uses. In accordance with WAC 246-290-230 - Distribution Systems, the distribution system must provide fire flow at a minimum pressure of 20 psi during PDD conditions. Supply facilities (i.e., supply stations, pump stations, interties) are typically designed to supply water at a rate that is equal to or greater than the system's PDD. Water supply records and reservoir telemetry reports are typically used to determine a system's PDD; however, complete telemetry records of supply and reservoir data were not available to compute the PDD of the system. Therefore, the PDD was estimated by applying a typical peak day demand to average day demand ratio of 2.00 to the system's actual average day demand amount. This results in an estimated PDD of 4,052 gpm for 2014, as shown in Table 4-8. Peak Hour Demand Peak Hour Demand (PHD) is the maximum amount of water use, excluding fire flow, during a one hour time period of a given year. In accordance with WA 246-290-230 - Distribution Systems, new public water systems or additions to existing systems shall be designed to provide 15-1662 Page 4-8 J Packet Pg. 191 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS domestic water at a minimum pressure of 30 psi during PHD conditions. Water main sizing and analysis and equalizing storage are typically based on PHD data. The PHD, like the PDD, is typically determined from the combined flow of water into the system from all supply sources and reservoirs. Similar to the PDD, sufficient information was not available to calculate the City's PHD based on actual system data. Therefore, the PHD was estimated based on a typical PHD/PDD ratio of 1.80, resulting in a PHD of 7,294 gpm for 2014. The peaking factors shown in Table 4-8 are based on the demand data shown in the table. These peaking factors are used later in the chapter in conjunction with projected ADD to project future PDD and PHD for the system. Table 4-8 Peak Day Demands and Peaking Factors Peak Day Demand Data Demand Type Date Demand (gpm) Average Day Demand (ADD) 2014 2,026 Peak Day Demand (PDD) Data unavailable Assumed PDD/ADD = 2.0 4,052 Peak Hour Demand (PHD) Data unavailable Assumed PHD/PDD = 1.8 7,294 Peaking Factors Description Peaking Factor Peak Day Demand/Average Day Demand (PDD/ADD) 2.00 Peak Hour Demand/Peak Day Demand (PHD/PDD) 1.80 Peak Hour Demand/Average Day Demand (PHD/ADD) 3.60 Fire Flow Demand Fire Flow Demand is the amount of water required during firefighting as defined by applicable codes. Fire flow requirements are established for individual buildings and expressed in terms of flow rate (gpm) and flow duration (hours). Fighting fires imposes the greatest demand on a water system due to the high rate at which water must be supplied over a short period of time. This requires that each component of the system be properly sized and configured to meet the most stringent demand placed on it. General fire flow requirements were established for the different land use categories to provide a target level of service for planning and sizing future water facilities. The general fire flow requirement for each land use category within the City's service area is shown in Table 4-9. The water system analyses presented in Chapter 8 are based on an evaluation of the water system providing sufficient fire flow in accordance with these general fire flow requirements. 15-1662 Page 4-9 J Packet Pg. 192 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-9 General Fire Flow Requirements Land Use Category Fire Flow Requirement (gpm) Flow Duration (hours) Single Family Residential 1,000 2 Multi -Family Residential 3,000 3 Commercial/Business/Mixed Use 3,000 3 Schools 3,000 3 Hospital 1 5,000 1 4 11 Future Water Demands Method of Projecting Demands Future demands were calculated from the projected population data from Chapter 3 and the per capita demand data from Table 4-3. The demand projections were computed with and without a further reduction in water use from conservation. The per capita demand of existing customers (95 gallons per day) was used for all demand projections without water conservation. The future water demand projections with conservation were based on a reduced per capita demand that reflects the City's water use reduction goals, as shown in the City's Water Use Efficiency Program in Appendix F. Future Water Demand Projections Table 4-10 presents the estimated water demands of the system each year for the next ten years and at the end of the 20-year planning period. The actual demand data from 2013 and 2014 is also shown in the table for comparison purposes. The future ADD values were projected based on population estimates for the given years and the estimated per capita demand values. The future PDD values and PHD values were computed from the projected ADD values for that year and the existing system peaking factors shown in Table 4-8. The future demand projections are shown both with and without estimated reductions in water use from achieving the City's conservation goals. The 20-year projected demand data without conservation reductions was used for the evaluation of the planned improvements presented in Chapter 9 to ensure that the future system will be sized properly to meet all requirements, whether or not additional water use reductions from conservation are achieved. 15-1662 Page 4-10 J Packet Pg. 193 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-10 Future Water Demand Projections Description Historical Projected 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (+6 yrs) 2021 2022 2023 2024 (+10 yrs) 2025 2034 (+20 yrs) 2035 Population Data Population in Water Service Area 31,299 31,290 31,716 31,878 32,042 1 32,206 1 32,371 1 32,536 32,703 32,870 33,039 33,208 33,378 34,948 35,127 Demand Basis Data (gal/day/capita) Average Day Demand without Conservation 94 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Average Day Demand with Conservation 92 92 91 90 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 88 88 Average Day Demand (gpm) Demand without Conservation 2,040 2,026 2,092 2,103 2,114 2,125 2,136 2,146 2,157 2,169 2,180 2,191 2,202 2,306 2,317 Demand with Conservation 2,026 2,037 2,025 2,013 2,001 2,011 2,021 2,032 2,042 2,052 2,063 2,136 2,147 Average Day Demand (MGD) Demand without Conservation 2.94 2.92 3.01 3.03 3.04 3.06 3.08 3.09 3.11 3.12 3.14 3.15 3.17 3.32 3.34 Demand with Conservation 2.92 2.93 2.92 2.90 2.88 2.90 2.91 2.93 2.94 2.96 2.97 3.08 3.09 Peak Day Demand (gpm) Demand without Conservation 4,079 4,053 4,185 4,206 4,228 4,249 4,271 4,293 4,315 4,337 4,359 4,382 4,404 4,611 4,635 Demand with Conservation 4,053 4,073 4,050 4,026 4,001 4,022 4,042 4,063 4,084 4,105 4,126 4,271 4,293 Peak Day Demand (MGD) Demand without Conservation 5.87 5.84 6.03 6.06 6.09 6.12 6.15 6.18 6.21 6.25 6.28 6.31 6.34 6.64 6.67 Demand with Conservation 5.84 5.87 5.83 5.80 5.76 5.79 5.82 5.85 5.88 5.91 5.94 6.15 6.18 Peak Hour Demand (gpm) Demand without Conservation 7,343 7,295 7,533 7,571 7,610 7,649 7,688 7,727 7,767 7,807 7,847 7,887 7,927 8,300 8,343 Demand with Conservation 7,295 7,332 7,289 7,246 7,202 7,239 7,276 7,314 7,351 7,389 7,427 7,689 7,728 2013 and 2014 Peak Day Demand and Peak Hour Demand values are based on actual average day demand amounts for the given year and the City's peaking factors, and may not represent actual peak demands for these years. Water reductions are based on the Everett Water Utility Conservation Program, with a target reduction of 5.9% by 2019. 15-1662 Page 4-11 J Packet Pg. 194 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U r O N N t a+ CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 195 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMAND Future ERU Projections Table 4-11 presents the projected number of ERU's of the system for years 2020, 2024, and 2034 relative to the baseline year of 2014. The 6-year, 10-year, and 20-year ERU forecasts are based on the projected water demands from Table 4-10 and the system -wide average demand per ERU that was computed from recent demand data, as shown in Table 4-7. The projections for 2021, 2025, and 2035 are also provided for reference. Table 4-11 Future ERU Projections 2020 2021 2024 2025 2034 2035 Description Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected (+6 yrs) (+10 yrs) (+20 yrs) Demand Data (gpm) ADD, without 2,146 2,157 2,191 2,202 2,306 2,317 Conservation ERU Basis Data (gal/day/ERU) Demand per ERU, 201 201 201 201 201 201 without Conservation Equivalent Residential Units (ERU's) Total System ERU's 15,400 15,500 1 15,700 1 15,800 16,500 16,600 Water Demand Data Collection and Reporting Demand Data Collection The demand data presented in this chapter includes both the supply and use (i.e., consumption) sides of water demands, which the City has collected and recorded for many years. The supply side data is recorded by a water meter in the Alderwood Supply Station that is connected to the City's SCADA system. This provides a continuous recording of the volume and rate of water supply into the City's system. The City's other supply station, which provides a standby source of supply from Seattle Public Utilities regional system, is also metered and connected to the City's SCADA system. On the water use side, customer demand data is recorded by meters at all water service connections and collected every other month. Also included on the water use side and recorded with portable meters is permitted water use from fire hydrants for construction, street cleaning, and water main flushing. 15-1662 Page 4-13 J Packet Pg. 196 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Demand Data Reporting A summary of past water use is reported each year in the City's Water Use Efficiency Annual Performance Report, which is one of the requirements of the Water Use Efficiency Rule. In addition to this annual report, the City will continue to report demand data when updating its water system plan in the future. 15-1662 Page 4-14 Ju Packet Pg. 197 7.1.a CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Introduction The City of Edmonds (City) strives to provide high quality water service at a reasonable cost to its customers. This is achieved through the guidance of the following laws, policies, and design criteria that are applied to operating, maintaining, and planning improvements for the water system. Federal Regulations • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency State Regulations Washington State Department of Health Washington State Department of Ecology County Regulations • Snohomish County Council City Regulations and Policies • Edmonds City Council Design Criteria • American Water Works Association • Washington State Department of Health The Edmonds City Council must adopt policies that meet or exceed those established by governments above them. The governmental entities above the City Council include the U.S. Government, Washington State, and the Snohomish County Council. The City's policies are documented and implemented through ordinances, operation procedures, engineering and construction standards, and design criteria. The City's water system policies and design criteria are organized and presented in this chapter under the following sections: water service, water supply, and facility policies and design criteria. The City's financial policies are described in Chapter 10. 15-1662 Page 5-1 J Packet Pg. 198 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Water Service Policies New Water Services • The City will provide potable water service to all people within its water service area, provided all policies related to service can be met. Requests for new water service will be processed by the City's Building Division as part of a Building Division permit. Applications are reviewed to ensure the proposed service is located within the City's retail water service area and will be evaluated by the Engineering department using the City's water model to determine fire flow availability, meter size, line size and improvements necessary for adequate water pressure, fire flow, looping or extensions. New water service applications will be processed within the following timeframes: o New single family residence: approximately 60 days o New commercial building: approximately 90 days o New fire connection: approximately 20 days • Water system improvements and extensions required to provide water service to proposed developments will be reviewed and approved by the City, and must conform to the City's current design criteria, construction standards and specifications, as shown in the City's Water System Construction Standards contained in Appendix G. All costs of the improvements and extensions will be paid by the applicant. Delays affecting the City's ability to provide new water service are the responsibility of the applicant. Delays resulting from non -technical conditions may include environmental assessments, local ordinances, annexations, and various other issues. • Disputes received by the City are routed to the appropriate department and resolved. Disputes not resolved by City staff are resolved by the City Council with assistance from the City's legal counsel, as necessary. • Water service requests for areas outside of the City limits without annexation will be reviewed by the City Council after coordinating with the appropriate adjacent water system and the Department of Health. Water service to areas outside of the City limits shall be in compliance with Snohomish County's adopted land use plan, zoning and development regulations. • Water system capacity is evaluated as part of the City's update of its water system plan to confirm the system's ability to provide adequate water service to both existing and future water customers. 15-1662 Page 5-2 J Packet Pg. 199 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Annexations • Areas annexed without existing municipal water service will be served by the City. • Areas annexed with existing municipal water service must meet the City's water system standards. • The City will follow state guidelines in the assumption of facilities in annexation areas. • The City will comply with the existing water supply agreement with Alderwood Water & Wastewater District in assuming portions of adjacent water systems as a result of annexation. Water Supply Policies Water Quality • The City will strive to provide high quality water while complying with all water quality regulatory requirements. • The City will promptly respond to situations that may adversely affect water quality. Water Quantity • The City will provide a sufficient quantity of water supply to existing customers and plan for at least 20 years into the future for meeting the needs of the water system. • The City will size new water system facilities and improvements to existing facilities to have sufficient capacity to meet the needs of the water system. Water Use Efficiency • The City will promote the efficient and responsible use of water and will participate in the Everett Water Utility Regional Conservation Program. • The City has a water use efficiency program. Documentation from the City's water use efficiency program is contained in Appendix F. 15-1662 Page 5-3 J Packet Pg. 200 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Cross -Connection Control • The City strives to protect its water system from contamination due to cross -connections and has developed a cross -connection control program for eliminating cross - connections. Documentation from the City's cross -connection control program is contained in Appendix H. • The City regularly reviews building permit applications for potential cross connections. • The City will comply with the backflow prevention assembly installation and testing requirements as indicated in WAC 246-290-490 and as published in the manual titled Cross Connection Control Manual Accepted Procedures and Practice, Pacific Northwest Section, American Water Works Association (AWWA). • The City has staff that is certified for backflow prevention and testing. Facility Policies & Design Criteria This section describes the policies and design criteria used in planning for water system replacements, extensions, and future improvements. Water Pressure • The City will supply water to all customers at a minimum pressure of 30 psi at the water meter during all demand conditions, except under fire flow or emergency situations. During fire flow situations, the City will maintain a minimum pressure of at least 20 psi at the water meter for all customers throughout the system. • The City will provide pressure reducing stations to control pressures in the distribution system and avoid high pressures. It is the customer's responsibility to install an approved pressure regulator on the customer side of the water meter to maintain pressures at 80 psi or less. Pipeline Velocities • All new distribution system water mains will be designed to deliver the required amount of flow at a velocity of 10 feet per second (fps) or less. Velocities exceeding 10 fps are acceptable within short lengths of pipe and within water system facilities. • All new transmission mains will be designed to deliver the required amount of flow at a velocity of 10 fps or less and will be evaluated for hydraulic surges (transient conditions) using a hydraulic model capable of surge analyses. 15-1662 Page 5-4 J Packet Pg. 201 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Storage Facilities • A sufficient amount of storage will be provided within the distribution system to facilitate the operation of the water system by maintaining adequate distribution system pressure and to provide supplemental supply during peak demand periods and emergency events. • Storage facilities will be sized to provide stored water for the following purposes: o Operational storage will be available to aid in the operation of supply and pump facilities. o Equalizing storage will be provided to supply the water system under peak demand conditions, when the system demand exceeds the total rate of supply of the supply facilities. Equalizing storage must be maintained above an elevation that provides a minimum pressure of 30 psi at all service connections under peak hour demand conditions. o Standby storage will be provided to supply the water system under emergency conditions when supply facilities are out of service. Standby storage must be stored above an elevation that provides a minimum pressure of 20 psi at all service connections under peak hour demand conditions. o Fire suppression storage will be provided to supply water to the system at the maximum rate and duration required to extinguish a fire at the building with the highest fire flow requirement. Fire suppression storage must be stored above an elevation that will provide a minimum pressure of 20 psi at all service connections under peak day demand conditions. Transmission & Distribution Mains • All new transmission and distribution mains will be looped to increase reliability and fire flow capacity, unless the City determines that looping is not practical. • All new water mains will be designed under the direction of a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington and will comply with the water quality testing and construction completion requirements of the DOH. • All water system improvements and installation of new water mains shall be in accordance with City standard specifications and details. • The diameter of all new distribution water mains will be reviewed by the City and may include hydraulic analyses using the City's hydraulic model. 15-1662 Page 5-5 J Packet Pg. 202 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA • Dead-end water mains with fire hydrants shall be at least 8-inch diameter pipe up to the fire hydrant. If approved by the City, short dead-end water mains without fire hydrants, generally less than 50 feet long, may be constructed with 6-inch diameter or smaller pipe. • Distribution water mains providing fire flow shall be sized to provide the required fire flow at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi and maximum pipeline velocity of 10 fps under peak day demand conditions. • All new water mains will be ductile iron pipe (class 52 minimum) with cement mortar lining. • The following valves shall be installed with the water main: o Isolation valves shall be installed at locations along the water main to allow sections to be shut down for repair or installing services. On average, the maximum distance between isolation valves shall be 350 feet. A minimum of three valves shall be provided per cross and two valves per tee. o Zone valves shall be located at all pressure zone boundaries when a water main crosses a pressure zone boundary and connects into each pressure zone. o Combination air and vacuum release valves shall be placed at all high points of water main installations. Water Services All residential water service lines shall be 1-inch diameter or larger. The meter shall be 3/4-inch diameter or larger. • All new customer service lines serving new structures, shall be installed with a pressure reducing valve on the customer's side of the water meter. The valve shall be placed within the structure being served. Supply Stations and Pump Stations All supply station and pump station improvements shall comply with the following minimum standards: All structures shall be non-combustible, where practical. All buildings shall have adequate heating, cooling, ventilation, insulation, lighting, and interior work space. 15-1662 Page 5-6 J Packet Pg. 203 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA • All sites shall be fenced and locked to prevent unauthorized personnel from entering the water system facilities. Below -grade facilities located in areas that cannot be fenced shall be secured and locked. • Each station shall be equipped with a flow meter, pressure gauges, pressure transmitters and all necessary instrumentation to assist personnel in operating and troubleshooting the facility. • Backup power shall be provided at all pump stations to maintain full operation during power outages. • Pumps shall be operated automatically with the ability to operate manually. • The monitoring of stations and adjustment of control settings shall be capable locally and remotely. All supply and pump stations shall be monitored with alarms for the following conditions: • Pump started automatically or manually. • Low suction pressure. • High discharge pressure. • Flooding and fire. • Power phase failure. • Communication link failure. • Intrusion by unauthorized personnel. All supply and pump stations shall have the following data recorded: Flow rate and flow totalizing. Incoming and outgoing pressures. All alarm conditions. Pressure Reducing Stations All pressure reducing stations shall be constructed according to the City's standard plans. • Below -grade concrete vaults shall drain to daylight, drain to a storm pipe system, or be equipped with a sump pump. • A pressure relief valve shall be installed on the low-pressure side of the pressure reducing valve to prevent system over -pressurization in case of a pressure reducing valve failure. The pressure relief valve shall be sized by the City using the City's 15-1662 Page 5-7 J Packet Pg. 204 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA hydraulic model. It may be necessary to place the pressure relief valve in a separate vault. Fire Hydrants • The City has established policies for the installation, maintenance and ownership of fire hydrants within the City limits, which include the water service areas of both the City and Olympic View Water and Sewer District. • Fire hydrants serving detached single family dwellings or duplex dwellings on individual lots shall be located not more than 600 feet on center such that all single family lots are within 300 feet from a fire hydrant, as measured along the path of vehicular access. If dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed such that hydrant spacing does not exceed 600 feet. • Fire hydrants serving any use other than detached single family dwellings or duplex dwellings on individual lots shall be spaced an average of 300 feet apart on center and shall be located so that all structures are located within 150 feet of a hydrant. If dead- end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 150 feet long, then additional fire hydrants shall be installed so that the hydrant spacing does not exceed 300 feet. • All fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Fire hydrant spacing shall be measured along vehicle access routes. • The City Fire Marshal will review all proposed fire hydrant installations to ensure the correct number, location and spacing of fire hydrants for each project. 0 Additional requirements for fire hydrants are contained in the City Fire Code, Chapter 19.25 of the Edmonds Municipal Code. This code is provided in Appendix I. 15-1662 Page 5-8 J Packet Pg. 205 7.1.a CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY Overview This chapter describes the City of Edmonds' (City's) existing water source and current water quality regulations. Also discussed are the City's water quality monitoring program, monitoring requirements, and results of past water quality monitoring. Water Source Alderwood Water & Wastewater District Supply The City currently supplies its entire system through the Alderwood Supply Station with water purchased from Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD). AWWD, in turn, purchases its water from the City of Everett (Everett). The supply of wholesale water from the AWWD to the City is provided under the terms of the 2010 Water Supply Agreement (see Appendix A). The agreement states "The water delivered by the District to the Master Meter shall comply with state and federal standards for drinking water and be of the same standard and quality normally delivered to the District's other customers". Therefore, the quality of water entering the City's system is the same quality as the water delivered to the District's retail customers. The Everett raw water supply originates in the Spada Reservoir, created by the Culmback Dam on the Sultan River approximately 25 miles east of Everett. The basin is protected and patrolled. The raw water passes through the Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Power House prior to entering the Chaplain Reservoir. Water from Chaplain Reservoir is delivered to the Everett Water Filtration Plant before supply to Everett, AWWD, the City, and several other water systems in Snohomish County. Prior to 1983, the supply of water from Everett was limited to treatment consisting of sedimentation, screening, and chlorination due to the good quality of its source. However, a higher level of treatment eventually became necessary due to more stringent water quality regulations. In 1983, the Everett Water Filtration Plant was constructed to meet these needs, including chlorination and fluoridation. Additional chlorination occurs at the reservoir sites within the AWWD service area. This ensures sufficient chlorine residuals throughout the distribution system. Source water quality has been good in the past and should continue to meet all of the mandated water quality requirements with the Everett Water Filtration Plant and the AWWD disinfection program. 15-1662 Page 6-1 J Packet Pg. 206 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) Supply The SPU Supply Station is operated in standby mode for short-term use as either an emergency supply or to provide additional supply for fire flows, since all water is now purchased from AWWD. The supply of wholesale water from SPU to the City is provided under the terms of the 2011 Water Purveyor Contract and its subsequent amendments (see Appendix A). The primary source of water that the City receives from SPU is from the Tolt River at the South Fork Tolt Reservoir, about 15 miles east of Duvall. Water is diverted, first, from the reservoir into the Tolt Regulating Basin, then to the Tolt Treatment Facility and, finally, into the Tolt Pipeline No. 1. This pipeline transports the water to purveyors that are primarily located both north and south of Seattle. SPU's water is delivered to the City from SPU's Richmond Highlands Tank, which is supplied by direct pumping from the Tolt transmission line, the Lake Forest Park Reservoir, or the Bitter Lake Pump Station. A 20-inch diameter water main spanning Fremont Avenue to NE 205th Street, at the King County/Snohomish County border, transmits SPU water from the Richmond Highlands Tank to the City's SPU Supply Station. Drinking Water Regulations Overview The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates the quality of drinking water in the United States. The EPA is allowed to delegate primary enforcement responsibility for water quality control to each state under provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The Department of Health (DOH) is responsible for implementing and enforcing the drinking water regulations in the State of Washington. For the State of Washington to maintain primacy (delegated authority to implement requirements) under the SDWA, the State must adopt drinking water regulations that are at least as stringent as the federal regulations. The State, in cooperation with DOH, has published drinking water regulations in Chapter 246- 290 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) to meet these stipulations. The City's water system identification number is 225004, as issued by the State of Washington DOH. Safe Drinking Water Act The SDWA was enacted in 1974 as a result of public concern about water quality. The SDWA sets standards for quality of drinking water and requires water treatment should these standards not be met. The SDWA also sets water testing schedules and methods that water systems must follow. In 1986, the SDWA was amended due to additional public concern and frequent contamination of groundwater from industrial solvents and pesticides. These amendments identified source water protection, operator training, funding for water system 15-1662 Page 6-2 J Packet Pg. 207 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY improvements, and public improvements as pivotal components of safe drinking water. The 1986 Amendments also require water systems to monitor and treat for a continuously increasing number of contaminants identified in the new federal regulations. Since implementation of the new regulations was marginally successful and slow, the SDWA was amended again and re -authorized in August of 1996. Water Quality Monitoring Monitoring Requirements Water quality monitoring requirements are contained in WAC 246-290-300. The City of Everett provides source water quality monitoring of its surface water source. The City of Edmonds provides water quality monitoring throughout its distribution system. In accordance with section (2)(b) of WAC 246-290-300, the City must comply with the following monitoring requirements since it receives completely treated water from another public water system: Collect coliform samples in accordance with subsection (3) of WAC 246-290-300. In summary, this consists of: a) Collecting a minimum of 30 coliform samples per month based on the population served and submitting the samples to a certified laboratory for analysis. i) Collecting and submitting additional samples as required when a coliform sample is determined to be invalid. b) Preparing a Coliform Monitoring Plan and updating it as necessary. 2. Collect disinfection byproduct samples as required by subsection (6) of WAC 246- 290-300. This includes sample collection during normal operating conditions within the distribution system either at the same time and location as routine or repeat coliform sampling takes place or at a daily recurrence (whichever is greater). 3. Perform disinfectant residual monitoring throughout the distribution system in accordance with subsection (6) of WAC 246-290-300 and as required under WAC 246-290-451. As a minimum, the residual disinfectant concentration within the distribution system shall be measured at the same time and location that a routine or repeat coliform sample is collected or daily, whichever is greater. 4. Perform lead and copper monitoring in accordance with subsection (5) of WAC 246- 290-300 and as required under 40 C.F.R. 141.86 (a) — (f), 141.87, and 141.88. 15-1662 Page 6-3 1 Packet Pg. 208 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY If unsatisfactory samples from the above monitoring are detected, the City must follow the procedures in WAC 246-290-320 for repeat sampling, DOH notification, and customer notification. The City documents the results of water quality testing and summarizes the results in an annual report to customers in compliance with the Consumer Confidence Report requirements that have been in effect since 1998. A copy of the City's latest annual water quality report is included in Appendix J. Monitoring Status The City is in compliance with all water quality monitoring requirements. A summary of the City's compliance status for the monitoring requirements identified above is presented below. Coliform Monitoring The City collects a minimum of 30 samples each month from different locations throughout the distribution system and submits the samples to a certified laboratory for coliform testing, as shown in the Coliform Monitoring Plan in Appendix K. All coliform monitoring results for the years 2002 through 2015 were satisfactory for the presence of coliforms except for two samples collected in 2010, one sample in 2011, and one sample in 2015. Subsequent repeat sampling for all of these had satisfactory results. Disinfection Byproduct Monitoring Since the implementation of the Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rule (DBPR) in 2006, the City has been required to perform additional monitoring and reporting of disinfectant byproducts in the distribution system. The Stage 2 DBPR focuses on monitoring and reducing concentrations of two classes of disinfection byproducts, consisting of Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) and five Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). The Stage 2 DBPR requires water systems to determine locations within the distribution system with the highest averages of TTHM and HAA5. The City prepared a Standard Monitoring Plan as part of the Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE) that outlined the City's approach for collecting one year of TTHM and HAA5 data at a specified frequency and at locations to characterize these contaminants levels in the system. The City has completed sampling under this plan and submitted its IDSE Report for Standard Monitoring on December 23, 2008. Monitoring under the Stage 2 DBPR has been conducted quarterly in accordance with the City's Standard Monitoring Plan. Compliance with the Stage 2 DBPR is achieved if the locational running annual average 15-1662 Page 6-4 J Packet Pg. 209 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY (LRAA) at each monitoring location for the four most recent quarters is less than or equal to 80 ppb (parts per billion) for TTHM and less than or equal to 60 ppb for HAA5. The results of TTHM and HAA5 monitoring in 2015 indicated compliance for TTHM with quarterly averages ranging from 41.6 to 58.1 ppb and an annual running average of 46.9 ppb and for HAA5 with quarterly averages ranging from 24.1 to 36.2 ppb and an annual running average of 29.5 ppb. Residual Disinfectant Concentration Monitoring In accordance with WAC 246-290-662, the minimum residual disinfectant concentration entering the distribution system shall be at least 0.2 mg/L. Samples taken within the distribution system are required to have a residual disinfectant concentration that is detectable in at least 95 percent of the samples taken each calendar month. The results of the residual disinfectant concentration monitoring must be reported to DOH using DOH approved forms within ten days after the end of each month, unless otherwise directed by DOH. The samples collected from the City's distribution system for coliform monitoring are also analyzed for residual disinfectant concentration. Chlorine residual varies throughout the distribution system, but is typically between 0.4 and 0.9 mg/L. Lead and Copper Monitoring The Lead and Copper Rule identifies "action levels" for both lead and copper. The action levels for lead and copper are greater than 0.015 mg/L and 1.3 mg/L, respectively. If the 90th percentile concentration of either lead or copper from the group of samples exceeds these action levels, a corrosion control study must be undertaken to evaluate strategies and make recommendations for reducing the lead or copper concentration to below the action levels. Both federal and state regulations require monitoring for lead and copper every three years. The City participates in the City of Everett regional lead and copper monitoring program. This program involves the collection of samples by the City of Everett for all water systems that use Everett water. Most recently, the City of Everett obtained samples from locations throughout the Edmonds water service area in 2015. The results of past lead and copper monitoring within the City's water system indicated the following lead and copper concentration levels: • Lead 0 2000: 0.001 mg/L to 0.006 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2003: 0.001 mg/L to 0.044 mg/L (one sample exceeding action levels) 15-1662 Page 6-5 J Packet Pg. 210 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY 0 2006: less than or equal to 0.002 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2009: 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0032 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2012: 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0023 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2015: 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0027 mg/L (all below action levels) • Copper 0 2000: 0.005 mg/L to 0.107 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2003: 0.004 mg/L to 0.152 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2006: 0.020 mg/L to 0.076 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2009: 0.015 mg/L to 0.173 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2012: 0.0195 mg/L to 0.132 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2015: 0.0120 mg/L to 0.2230 mg/L (all below action levels) 15-1662 Page 6-6 Jf Packet Pg. 211 7.1.a CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Introduction This chapter summarizes the operations and maintenance activities of the City of Edmonds' (City's) Water Division, including a brief description of the personnel and their duties for operating and maintaining the water system. Water System Management and Personnel Management Structure The City's Water Division functions under the direction of the Public Works Director. The Water and Sewer Manager is responsible for management of the water system and reports to the Public Works Director. The daily operation of the water system functions under the direction of the Water Division Lead. The Water Division Lead and the Water Quality Technician reports to the Water and Sewer Manager and the Water Maintenance Workers and Meter Reader report to the Water Division Lead, as shown in Table 7-1. The Water Maintenance Staff are responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of the water system. Their tasks include routine operation and preventive maintenance, record keeping, inspection, testing, installation, and repair of system facilities, and maintenance required in response to emergencies. The City's water system must be operated by one or more certified operators in accordance with Washington State Law (WAC 246-292). In addition, specialty certification is required for backflow device testing. Table 7-2 shows the current certifications of the City's water operations and maintenance staff. Several certified crew members in the Sewer Division also assist the Water Division staff on an as -needed basis. The City maintains well qualified, technically trained staff and provides opportunities for ongoing training, certification, and membership in professional organizations. Personnel Responsibilities The key responsibilities of the water operations and maintenance staff are summarized below: • Public Works & Utilities Director: Manages administration, budget formulation, and utility rates. 15-1662 Page 7-1 J Packet Pg. 212 of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 7.1.a • Water/Sewer Manager: Responsible for the operation of the water and sewer utility systems. Supervises the implementation of programs, and oversees the budgeting process for water system operations and maintenance. • Water Lead Worker: Supervises all maintenance personnel in the Water Division. Supports the Water/Sewer Manager in the day-to-day operation of the water system. Coordinates preventative maintenance, daily operation, and repair. • Water Quality Technician: Responsible for all tasks related to maintaining and testing water quality and cross connection control throughout the distribution system and responds to water quality complaints. • Water Maintenance Workers: Directly involved in maintenance of the water system, monitoring of facilities, daily operations, inspection and repair, testing, response to complaints, and emergency response. • Water Meter Reader: Responsible for reading all customer meters, recording the data, and performing water meter maintenance. Table 7-1 Water System Operations and Maintenance Organization Chart Water Quality Technician Jeff Kobylk Public Works & Utilities Director Phil Williams Water/Sewer Manager Jim Waite Water Division Lead Kris Kuhnhausen Water Meter Reader Steve Leonard Water Maintenance Rick Shore Vincent Smith Jason Daniels Pat Rochford 15-1662 Page 7-2 J Packet Pg. 213 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Table 7-2 Personnel Certification Name Position CertNocation Certification Type Jim Waite Water/Sewer Manager 3763 WDM4, WDS, CCS, BAT, WTPOIT Kris Water Division Lead 5199 WDM3, WDS, CCS Kuhnhausen Jeff Kobylk Water Quality 11735 CCS, BAT, WDS Technician Rick Shore Senior Water 5441 WDM1, WDS, CCS Maintenance Vincent Smith Senior Water 6887 WDS, CCS Maintenance Jason Daniels Senior Water 8002 WDS Maintenance Patrick Senior Water Rochford Maintenance 13326 WDS Steve Leonard Meter Reader Certification Definitions WDM - Water Distribution Manager WDS - Water Distribution Specialist CCS - Cross Connection Control Specialist BAT - Backflow Assembly Tester WTPOIT - Water Treatment Plant Operator in Training Normal Operations Available Equipment The City owns and regularly uses a variety of equipment for daily routine operation and maintenance of the water system. The equipment and supplies needed for normal operation and maintenance of the water system is stored at the City's Public Works Facility. The City will also rent additional equipment, as needed, or contract with a local contractor for additional services. The following equipment and supplies are maintained by the City: 0 Repair bands, couplings, and replacement pipe for all sizes and types of water mains found in the system to be used for the repair or replacement of leaking or broken water mains. 15-1662 Page 7-3 1 Packet Pg. 214 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE • Spare service saddles, corporation stops, service lines, meter setters, meters and boxes to be used for the repair of service connections from leaks or accidental damage. • A complete hydrant assembly to be used for the repair or replacement of a leaking or damaged hydrant. • Spare parts for facilities found in the distribution system, including gate valves, pressure reducing valves, air release valves, and fire hydrants. • An adequate supply of dry chlorine is kept on hand. Chlorine is the only treatment chemical kept in stock. • Vehicles that include three crew trucks, two dump trucks, one flatbed truck, one meter reading vehicle, one vactor truck, and one backhoe. All vehicles are equipped with communications equipment to ensure a reliable method of communication within the organization. Routine Operations Routine operations involve the planning, coordination, and implementation of proper procedures to ensure that the water system is functioning properly and providing reliable, high - quality water to all customers at all times. Routine operations also involve planned maintenance activities and reading of customer meters. Routine Water Quality Sampling The City routinely samples water throughout the distribution system to ensure the water is safe for its customers' use, as required by law. The Department of Health (DOH) has adopted federal regulations that specify minimum sampling requirements for water systems. The sampling requirements are contained in WA 246-290-300 and depend on the population served, source type, and treatment provided. Water quality monitoring is discussed further in Chapter 6, the City's latest Water Quality Report in Appendix J, and the City's Coliform Monitoring Plan in Appendix K. Cross -Connection Control The City adopted a cross -connection control program that complies with WAC 246-290-490 for the protection of its potable water from contamination due to cross connections. Backflow prevention devices are required at any service connection where a potential for contamination exists, as defined by City ordinance (Edmonds City Code, Chapter 7.20 Backflow Prevention). The premise where the backflow prevention device is installed is placed on a yearly inspection list that is maintained by the Water Division. 15-1662 Page 7-4 J Packet Pg. 215 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The City routinely reviews building permit applications for potential cross connection situations. Several Water Division staff have the Cross Connection Specialist certification as shown in Table 7-2 and are capable of implementing the cross connection control program. Information from the City's cross connection control program is contained in Appendix H. Customer Complaint Response Program The City maintains a log of complaints received from water customers. Depending on the nature of the complaint, a Water Division employee may be contacted by radio or mobile phone to respond immediately if a public health issue is apparent. If not of immediate urgency, a work order will be completed and staff will respond as soon as feasible. The City dedicates one full-time employee to distribution system water quality. One of the responsibilities of this position is to address water quality complaints and inquiries. A computerized maintenance management system is used to document and track this activity. Recordkeeping & Reporting Regulations for recordkeeping and reporting are contained in WAC 246-290-480. The City maintains all records in its Information and Management System (IMS). All water system operating records are kept for an indefinite period. Records and reports maintained by the City include, but are not limited to, the following: • Water quality monitoring • Water quality complaints • Actions taken to correct Maximum Containment Level (MCL) violations • Variances or exemptions • Public notifications • Flushing activities • Backflow prevention devices and customer notices • Maintenance and construction records • System charts and drawings • O&M manuals • Personnel and legal records The required retention periods of critical records required by DOH in accordance with WAC 246-290-480 are as follows: • Bacteriological analyses results: 5 years. Chemical analysis (IOC, VOC, SOC, etc.) results: For as long as the system is in operation. 15-1662 Page 7-5 J Packet Pg. 216 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE • Copies of monitoring plans: As long as the corresponding monitoring occurs. Keep replaced plans 5 years for microbial and turbidity analysis and 10 years for chemical analyses. • Records of action taken by the system to correct violations: 10 years after the last action taken for that violation. • Records of sanitary surveys: 10 years. • Records concerning a variance or exemption granted to the system: 5 years once the variance or exemption expires. • Public notices: 3 years after issued. • Consumer Confidence Reports: 3 years. • Lead/Copper sampling data and analyses, reports, surveys, letters, evaluations, and schedules: 12 years. • Daily source meter readings: 10 years. • Other records of operation and analyses as may be required by DOH: 3 years. • Project reports, construction documents and drawings, inspection reports, and approvals life of the facility. The notification and reporting requirements of DOH are as follows: • The City must report the following to DOH: o Within one business day: a backflow incident per WAC 246-290-490 (8)f. o Within 48 hours: a failure to comply with the primary standards or treatment technique requirements specified in WAC 246-290. o Within 48 hours: a failure to comply with the monitoring requirements specified in WA 246-290. o Within 48 hours: a violation of a primary maximum contaminant level (MCL). • The City must submit to DOH all applicable reports required by WAC 246-290. Monthly reports are due by the 1 Oth day of the following month, unless otherwise specified. • Daily source meter readings and total annual source meter readings must be made available to DOH on request. 15-1662 Page 7-6 J Packet Pg. 217 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE • Water facilities inventory form (WFI) must be submitted to DOH within 30 days of any change in name, category, ownership, or responsibility for management of the water system. • The City must notify DOH of the presence of o Coliform in a sample within 10 days of notification by the testing laboratory. o Fecal coliform or E. coli in a sample by the end of the business day that the City is notified by the testing laboratory. • When a coliform MCL violation is determined, the City must: o Notify DOH within 24 hours of determining acute coliform MCL violations. o Notify DOH before the end of the next business day when a non -acute coliform MCL is determined. o Notify water customers in accordance with WAC 246-290 Part 7, Subpart A • Any reports or communications related to monitoring waivers must be submitted to DOH during each monitoring period or as required. Public Notification In accordance with WAC 246-290 Part 7, Subpart A, the City must notify water system customers if any of the following conditions occur: • Failure to comply with monitoring requirements under WAC 246-290. • Failure to comply with a primary MCL described under WAC 246-290-310. • Failure to comply with a surface water treatment technique. • Failure to comply with testing requirements. • Failure to comply with a DOH order. • Failure to comply with a variance or exemption schedule from DOH. • If the system is operating under a variance or exemption. • If system is identified as a source of waterborne disease outbreak. • If DOH issues the system a category red operating permit. • If DOH issues an order. The City will comply with public notification content requirements, notice distribution requirements, and time limit requirements specified in WAC 246-290 Part 7, Subpart A. More information on the City's public notification procedures is contained in the Coliform Monitoring Plan in Appendix K. 15-1662 Page 7-7 J Packet Pg. 218 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Safety Procedures and Equipment The City provides ongoing safety training for its staff to ensure a safe working environment. The American Water Works Association publishes a manual, entitled Safety Practices for Water Utilities (M3), describing safety programs and providing guidelines for safe work practices and techniques for a variety of water utility work situations. The City has implemented several safety rules related, but not limited to, the following: • Climbing water reservoirs (tanks or standpipes). • Traffic Control Flagger Certification • Forklift Operation • Confined Space Entry All employees in the Water Division have basic first aid training. All Water Division vehicles are equipped with first aid kits. First aid kits are also maintained at the Public Works Facility. A copy of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for the chemicals used in the operations and maintenance of the water system are kept on file at the Public Works Department. The data sheets identify the chemical name, hazardous ingredients, physical data, fire and explosion hazard data, health hazards, spill and disposal procedures, user protection information, handling and storage precautions, as well as other information about the product. Emergency Operations The Water Division staff are trained and equipped to respond to emergency events. The water system has been designed and constructed to operate under emergency conditions. A brief discussion of the capabilities of the water system infrastructure and its operation during emergency events follows. Multiple Supply Sources The City has the capability to maintain water service to its customers if its primary supply facility, the Alderwood Supply Station, is out of service. The City's standby supply facility, the Seattle Public Utilities Supply Station, could be used to supply the system during an emergency event. The City also has multiple emergency interties with adjacent water systems that could be used during this type of event. The City has five emergency interties with the City of Lynnwood and six emergency interties with the Olympic View Water & Wastewater District. Multiple Reservoirs The City has multiple reservoirs that provide redundancy to the operating areas they serve, should one of the reservoirs be out of service. The reservoirs include a 3.0 MG steel reservoir 15-1662 Page 7-8 J Packet Pg. 219 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE and 1.5 MG steel reservoir at the Five Corners site, a 1.5 MG buried concrete reservoir at the Yost Park site, and a 1.5 MG buried concrete reservoir at the Seaview Park site. Distribution System The City has installed water mains with multiple connections to other water mains and created looped water mains where possible. This looped configuration enables the City to maintain service to customers and minimize the number of customers taken out service during maintenance and repairs to the distribution system. Emergency Telephone Calls Emergency calls during business hours are handled through the City switchboard. Calls during non -business hours are handled through the Snohomish County Emergency Communication System (Sno-Com). One Water Division employee is on -call 24-hours a day. On -Call Personnel The City's "on -call' person is equipped with a phone, an iPad, and responds with a service vehicle. This allows a prompt response to any emergency calls. A list of emergency telephone numbers is provided to each "on -call' employee. Employee Cross -Training The City's public works operations and maintenance employees are trained in all areas of the City -owned utilities. This enables the City to draw from a larger pool of workers that are qualified to deal with water related issues in the event of an emergency. This places the City in a position of readiness where they are able to effectively deal with almost any problem that arises. Emergency Response Program The City of Edmonds Disaster Plan prepared by the City identifies procedures that would be carried out in the event of a serious emergency or disaster situation. The City has also prepared an Emergency Response Plan and a Vulnerability Assessment Plan of the water system, which includes contingency plans for responding to potential emergency conditions. Copies of these are kept on file at the Public Works Facility. 15-1662 Page 7-9 J Packet Pg. 220 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Preventive Maintenance The Water Division has developed a preventive maintenance program to ensure all critical components of the water system are properly functioning and regularly maintained for long- term performance and reliability. The schedule in Table 8-2 is followed for preventive maintenance of the City's water system. Table 7-3 Preventive Maintenance Schedule Infrastructure Frequency Maintenance Description Daily Inspect facility, site and security wally Inspect, clean, and maintain all equipment Pump Station Every 5 Rebuild control valves Years Daily Inspect facility, site and security wally Inspect exterior coating Reservoirs Every 5 Years Clean & inspect interiors Supply Annually Inspect, clean, and maintain all equipment Stations Every 5years Rebuild control valves Fire Hydrants Annually Operate/flush, inspect, clean, & maintain Annually Exercise, inspect, clean, & maintain all PRV Stations equipment Every 5 Rebuild control valves Years Valves Annually Operate, inspect, clean, & maintain Semi- Flush water mains using fire hydrants & Water Mains wally blow -off assemblies to discharge flushing water Staffing The Water Division is currently staffed with several full-time personnel consisting of water maintenance workers, a water quality technician, a meter reader, and a water maintenance lead worker. The Water and Sewer Manager allocates approximately 50 percent of their time to the Water Division. The Public Works Director oversees all Public Works activities, so a much smaller portion of their time is available to the water system. 15-1662 Page 7-10 J Packet Pg. 221 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Water Division is currently staffed with seven full-time personnel consisting of four field technicians, one water quality technician, one meter reader, and one lead supervisor. The Water and Sewer Manager and Public Works Director both allocate a portion of their time to the Water Division as well. The Water Division has been able to operate the water system and meet past regulatory requirements for public water systems. However, the increasing needs of the water system, combined with the additional demands of now having a consistent waterline replacement program and additional needs due to regulatory requirements, has created more challenges in completing planned preventive maintenance activities. Therefore, the City's Water Maintenance and Operations Division is planning to add at least one additional staff member in the near future to ensure continued compliance with regulatory requirements and the increasing needs of the system. 15-1662 Page 7-11 J Packet Pg. 222 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 223 7.1.a CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Introduction This chapter presents the analysis of the City of Edmonds' (City) existing water system. Individual water system components were analyzed under both existing and future water demand conditions to determine their ability to meet policies and design criteria. The City's water demands are presented in Chapter 4 and the City's policies and design criteria are presented in Chapter 5. A description of the water system facilities and their current operation is presented in Chapter 2. The last section of this chapter presents the existing system capacity analysis that aided in the determination of the maximum number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) that can be served by the City's water system. Planned water system capital improvements that resolve the deficiencies identified in this chapter are presented in Chapter 9. Pressure Zones Table 8-1 lists each of the City's seven pressure zones, the highest and lowest elevation served in each zone, and the minimum and maximum distribution system pressures within each zone, based on maximum static water conditions (full reservoirs and no system demands). This table shows that the City is currently providing water at sufficient pressures throughout the system, with the highest pressures occurring at the lowest elevations of each pressure zone. All new water services with pressures exceeding 80 psi must have individual pressure reducing valves to reduce the pressure to 80 psi or less, in accordance with the plumbing code. Table 8-1 Minimum and Maximum Distribution System Pressures Pressure Highest Elevation Served Static Pressure at Highest Elevation Lowest Elevation Served Static Pressure at Lowest Elevation Zone (ft) (psi) (ft) (psi) 596 455 61 270 141 505 365 61 195 134 500 400 43 180 139 486 375 48 170 137 425 285 61 175 108 420 250 74 155 115 325 245 35 10 137 Future 325 1 207 1 51 1 10 1 137 15-1662 Page 8-1 J Packet Pg. 224 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS It is the City's policy to provide water service at a minimum pressure of 40 psi, which has generally been accomplished with the design of the system and location of pressure zone boundaries. Due to the challenging topography throughout the system, high pressures do occur in several areas of the service area. As shown in Table 8-1, the highest elevation served in the 325 Zone will change in the future through a pressure zone conversion project, described in Chapter 9, that converts an area of the 325 Zone to the 486 Zone. Alderwood Supply Station This section evaluates the City's Alderwood Supply Station to determine if it has sufficient capacity to provide water supply to the system at a rate that meets the existing and future demands of the system. In the past, the City operated its water system as two independent service areas. This was based on the north service area being supplied with water from Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD) and the south service area being supplied with water from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU). The City now operates the system as one service area completely supplied with water from AWWD, due to the rising cost of water purchased from SPU. The City's SPU Supply Station remains in service but operates in a standby mode, providing additional supply to the system only when needed. All water is supplied through the City's Alderwood Supply Station. Analysis Criteria Supply facilities must provide a reliable and sufficient quantity of water at pressures meeting the requirements of WAC 246-290-230. The capacity of supply facilities in a pressure zone with adequate storage must be sufficient to provide water at a rate that is equal to or greater than the peak day demand of the zone being served. This approach assumes that demands in excess of the peak day demand will be supplied from the equalizing storage portion of reservoirs. Since the City's Alderwood Supply Station provides supply to pressure zones that can also be supplied from storage for intraday peak demands, the supply requirement for the supply station is equal to the peak day demand of the system. Analysis Results The Alderwood Supply Station delivers water to the City's entire water system and is supplied directly into the 596 Zone, meeting customer demands and filling the two reservoirs at the Five Corners site. Water is supplied to the remaining lower pressure zones from the 596 Zone through multiple pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations. Table 8-2 summarizes the evaluation of the City's Alderwood Supply Station to determine if it has sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future demands of the system. The existing system and future system evaluations are based on the existing facility, which has a maximum supply capacity of approximately 7,000 gpm. The capacity of the existing facility 15-1662 Page 8-2 J Packet Pg. 225 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS was increased after completion of improvements in 2010, that enables flow through both the mainline and bypass portions of the station. The results of the evaluation, as shown in Table 8-2, indicate the City's Alderwood Supply Station has sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future supply requirements of the system through the year 2034. Table 8-2 Alderwood Supply Station Capacity Evaluation Description Existing System Year 2014 Future System Year 2034 (gpm) (gpm) Required Supply Capacity Peak Day Demand (PDD) 1 4,052 4,611 Available Supply Capacity Alderwood Supply Station 1 7,000 7,000 Surplus Supply Capacity Surplus Capacity 1 2,948 2,389 Five Corners Pump Station This section evaluates the Five Corners Pump Station to determine if it has sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future demands of the system. Analysis Criteria The primary purpose of the pump station is to pump stored water from the Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir to the 596 Zone to supplement the Alderwood Supply Station supply during peak demand periods, to provide supplemental fire flow, and to provide emergency supply. This is accomplished by using standby storage from the Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir should the Alderwood Supply Station be out of service. The criteria for evaluating the capacity of the Five Corners Pump Station is based on the most stringent condition in which the system simultaneously experiences peak hour demands and a fire flow in the 596 Zone. This fire flow is based on the largest requirement of 5,000 gpm. Supply to the system during this condition is provided by the Alderwood Supply Station, Five Corners Pump Station, and SPU Supply Station, which is configured to automatically activate during this type of an event. The analysis is based on the pump station with improvements that were completed in 2010 and control improvements that were implemented in 2016. 15-1662 Page 8-3 J Packet Pg. 226 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Analysis Results The results of the evaluation, as shown in Table 8-3, indicate the Five Corners Pump Station has sufficient capacity to serve its purpose in providing supplemental supply to the system, based on both the existing and future supply requirements of the system. As shown in Table 8-3, the required supply from the Five Corners Pump Station increases to 800 gpm in the future (2034) due to increased demands. Table 8-3 Five Corners Pump Station Capacity Evaluation Description Kk Existing System Year 2014 Future System Year 2034 Required Supply (gpm) System Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 7,294 8,300 Maximum Fire Flow Requirement 5,000 5,000 Total Required Supply 12,294 13,300 Available Supply (gpm) Alderwood Supply Station Capacity 7,000 7,000 SPU Supply Station Capacity 5,500 5,500 Total Supply Capacity 12,500 12,500 Required Supply from Five Corners Pump Station (gpm) Required Supply from Pump Station 0 800 Available Supply from Five Corners Pump Station (gpm) Five Corners Pump Station Capacity 2,400 2,400 Surplus Pump Station Capacity (gpm) Surplus Pump Station Capacity 2,400 1,600 Storage Facilities This section evaluates whether the City's four existing water storage facilities have sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future storage requirements of the system. Analysis Criteria Water storage is provided in a public water system to achieve multiple purposes and can be represented by the following components: operational storage, equalizing storage, standby storage, fire flow storage, and dead storage. The following subsections provide a description of each storage component and the criteria used to evaluate the capacity of the City's storage facilities. 15-1662 Page 8-4 J Packet Pg. 227 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Operational Storage Operational storage is the upper portion of the reservoir that is used to supply the water system under normal demand conditions. Operational storage is the average amount of draw down in the reservoir during normal operating conditions, which represents a volume of storage that will most likely not be available for other purposes. The operational storage in all four of the City's reservoirs is the volume of storage between the average water level of the reservoirs and the maximum water level (i.e., overflow elevation) of the reservoirs. Equalizing Storage Equalizing storage is the portion of the reservoir, below operational storage, that is used to supply the water system under peak demand conditions when the system demand exceeds the total rate of supply of the sources. The criteria for determining the equalizing storage requirements for the City's system, which is supplied continuously from the Alderwood Supply Station, is based on the Department of Health (DOH) formula that considers the difference between peak hour demand and supply capacity over the course of 150 minutes. Standby Storage Standby storage is the portion of the reservoir used to supply the water system under emergency conditions when supply facilities are out of service. Considering the City's historically reliable supply from AW", standby supply from SPU, and 11 emergency interties with two adjacent water systems, the need for a large amount of standby storage is not warranted. Therefore, the standby storage requirement is based on a sufficient volume to provide all water supply to the system for one day during an average day demand condition when the Alderwood Supply Station is out of service and no other supply is provided by other facilities. Fire Flow Storage Fire flow storage is the portion of the reservoir with sufficient volume to supply water to the system at the maximum rate and duration required to extinguish a fire at the building with the highest fire flow requirement. The magnitude of the fire flow storage is the product of the fire flow rate and duration of the system's maximum fire flow requirement. Fire flow requirements differ for the 325 Pressure Zone, versus the rest of the system. The required volume of fire flow storage for the 325 Zone is based on a 3,000 gpm fire flow for a 3-hour duration. The required volume of fire flow storage for the remaining pressure zones is based on a 5,000 gpm fire flow for a 4-hour duration. Both standby storage and fire flow storage are considered emergency storage components and can be nested, as approved by local fire protection authorities. The City has elected to nest these two storage components, which results in the larger of the two individual components being used for both standby and fire flow purposes. 15-1662 Page 8-5 J Packet Pg. 228 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Dead Storage Dead storage is the bottom portion of the reservoir that cannot be used because water is stored at an elevation that is too low to either pump or flow by gravity to provide sufficient pressure. This unusable storage occupies the lower portion of most ground -level standpipe style reservoirs. Analysis Approach The storage analysis is based on an evaluation of the existing reservoirs providing water to the two operating areas that they serve. The Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir and 1.5 MG Reservoir provide storage to an operating area that includes all pressure zones, except for the 325 Zone. The 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir and 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir provide storage for the 325 Zone. Existing Storage Analysis Results The results of the storage analysis for the existing system indicate that the existing storage facilities have sufficient capacity to meet existing demands, as shown in Table 8-4. The two Five Corners reservoirs have approximately 0.52 MG of excess storage for the pressure zones that they serve (all pressure zones except the 325 pressure zone). The Yost Reservoir and Seaview Reservoir have approximately 0.71 MG of excess storage for the 325 Zone. This results in a total, system -wide surplus storage of 1.22 MG for the existing capacity. Table 8-4 Existing Storage Capacity Evaluation Description All Zones except 325 Zone (MG) 325 Zone (MG) Total System (MG) Usable Storage (MG) Maximum Storage Capacity 3.90 3.00 6.90 Dead (Non -usable) Storage -0.36 0.00 -0.36 Total Usable Storage 3.54 3.00 6.54 Required Storage (MG) Operational Storage 1.01 1.34 2.35 Equalizing Storage 0.03 0.01 0.04 Standby & Fire Flow Storage* 1.98 0.94 2.92 Total Required Storage 3.02 2.29 5.32 Surplus Storage 0.52 0.71 1.22 General Note: Standby storage is larger than fire flow storage requirements, based on one day of storage for 201 gallons per day per ER U. 15-1662 Page 8-6 J Packet Pg. 229 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Future Storage Analysis Results The future storage analysis was performed to determine the adequacy of the City's existing reservoirs to meet the future storage requirements, based on projected demands for the year 2034. The demands used in this analysis are projected demands without reductions from conservation efforts. The results of the future storage analysis indicate that the existing storage facilities have sufficient capacity to meet the future demands of the system in 2034, as shown in Table 8-5. Therefore, additional storage capacity is not required within the 20-year planning period. Under future conditions, a total, system -wide surplus storage of 0.67 MG is allotted. A number of improvements to the existing reservoirs, not related to capacity, are planned by the City and identified in Chapter 9. Table 8-5 Future Storage Capacity Evaluation Description All Zones except 325 Zone (MG) 325 Zone (MG) Total System (MG) Usable Storage (MG) Maximum Storage Capacity 3.90 3.00 6.90 Dead (Non -usable) Storage -0.36 0.00 -0.36 Total Usable Storage 3.54 3.00 6.54 Required Storage (MG) Operational Storage 1.01 1.34 2.35 Equalizing Storage 0.13 0.06 0.20 Standby & Fire Flow Storage* 2.25 1.07 3.32 Total Required Storage 3.40 2.47 5.87 Surplus Storage 0.14 0.53 0.67 General Note: Standby storage is larger than fire flow storage requirements, based on one day of storage for 201 gallons per day per ER U. Distribution and Transmission System This section evaluates the City's existing distribution and transmission water mains to determine if they are sized and looped adequately to provide the necessary flow rates and pressures to meet the existing and future requirements of the system. Analysis Criteria The criteria used to evaluate the City's distribution and transmission system is contained in WAC 246-290-230. The pressure analysis criteria states that the distribution system "shall be designed with the capacity to deliver the design peak hour demand quantity of water at 30 psi 15-1662 Page 8-7 J Packet Pg. 230 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS under peak hour demand flow conditions measured at all existing and proposed service water meters or along property lines adjacent to mains if no meter exists, and under the condition where all equalizing storage has been depleted." It also states that if fire flow is to be provided, then "the distribution system shall also provide maximum day demand (MDD) plus the required fire flow at a pressure of at least 20 psi at all points throughout the distribution system, and under the condition where the designed volume of fire suppression and equalizing storage has been depleted." Hydraulic Model A hydraulic computer model of the City's water system was used to evaluate the existing system and identify proposed improvements to resolve deficiencies. The hydraulic model was also used to demonstrate that the proposed improvements will eliminate the identified deficiencies and meet the future demand requirements. A description of the hydraulic model and settings used for the analyses follows. Description The City's existing water system was modeled with the Innovyze InfoWater' software (version 12.3, Update #3). InfoWater' is a GIS-based modeling program that uses the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) software, EPANET, as its analysis engine. EPANET is a widely accepted program for the purposes of analyzing water distribution piping systems. All existing facilities and water mains in the City's water system were modeled, including recent improvements. Demand Data The hydraulic model contains average day demands of the existing system, based on 2014 demand data. A global demand factor was used to adjust the demands to reflect future 2034 demand levels. Demand peaking factors from Chapter 4 were used to adjust demand levels to peak day demand for the fire flow analyses and peak hour demand for the pressure analysis. Facility Data The hydraulic model of the existing system for the pressure analysis contains all active existing system facilities with settings that correspond to peak hour demand events. The Alderwood Supply Station was operating in pressure control mode to maintain pressures in the 596 Zone. The Five Corners Pump Station was modeled to reflect the recent pump station improvements. The reservoirs were modeled with water levels that reflect full utilization of operational and equalizing storage. All active pressure reducing stations were modeled as being in service and at their normal set points. 15-1662 Page 8-8 J Packet Pg. 231 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS The hydraulic model of the existing system for the fire flow analyses contains all active existing system facilities with settings that correspond to peak day demand events. The Alderwood Supply Station was set up to operate in pressure control mode to maintain pressures in the 596 Zone. The Five Corners Pump Station was modeled to operate under pressure control, based on inflow from the Alderwood Supply Station and system pressures. The reservoirs were modeled with water levels that reflect full utilization of operational, equalizing, and fire flow storage. The depletion of fire flow storage for the analyses in all pressure zones, except the 325 Zone, was based on a maximum fire now requirement of 5,000 gpm for a 4-hour duration. The depletion of fire flow storage for the analyses in the 325 Zone was based on a maximum fire flow requirement of 3,000 gpm for a 3-hour duration. All active pressure reducing stations were modeled as being in service and at their normal set points. The hydraulic model representing the proposed system in the year 2034 contains all active existing system facilities and planned system improvements that are identified in Chapter 9. The settings for all active existing and proposed facilities were set to correspond to the future peak day demand events for the fire flow analysis of the proposed water system. Otherwise, facility settings were the same as in the existing system analyses. Calibration Hydraulic model calibration is the process of using field pressure and flow data to improve the accuracy of the hydraulic model so that it can be used to accurately simulate operation of the actual water system. Initial calibration was accomplished by adjusting water main roughness coefficients based on a compilation of pipe material and year data. Additional calibration of the model was achieved using the most recent elevation data available for the water system, field flow and pressure data, which was collected from flow tests that the City performed throughout the system. Hydraulic Analyses Results Hydraulic analysis was performed to determine the capability of the system to meet the pressure and flow requirements identified in Chapter 5 and contained in WAC 246-290-230. The first analysis was performed to evaluate pressures throughout the system under existing (i.e., 2014) peak hour demand conditions. The results of this analysis were used to identify locations of low and high pressures. To satisfy the minimum pressure requirements, pressures at all water service locations were required to be at least 30 psi during these demand conditions. The results of this analysis indicated that all areas of the system have pressures greater than 30 psi. Fire flow analyses were performed throughout the system to determine the capability of the existing water system to provide adequate fire flow under peak day demand conditions. A separate fire flow analysis was performed for each node in the hydraulic model to determine the available fire flow at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi. For each node analyzed, the 15-1662 Page 8-9 J Packet Pg. 232 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS resulting fire flow was compared to its target fire flow requirement, which was assigned according to the land use classification that it is located within, as summarized in Table 4-9. A summary of the analyses results for representative locations in each pressure zone is shown in Table 8-6. The available fire flow shown in the table represents the flow in the area from a single fire hydrant location. The available fire flow from nearby hydrants, which would also be activated to fight an actual fire, is greater than the amounts shown in the table. Multiple fire hydrants are generally used to extinguish a fire by generating higher flows and simultaneously fighting the fire from multiple locations. The single hydrant modeling approach is used primarily for planning purposes to locate areas in the system that should be improved to ensure sufficient fire flow is available in each area of the system. The results of the fire flow analyses were used to identify improvements for water mains that are currently undersized or not looped adequately to provide sufficient fire flow. Upon completion of the existing system fire flow analyses, proposed water main improvements were included in the model and fire flow analyses were performed throughout the system to demonstrate that the improvements eliminate the existing system deficiencies and meet the future requirements of the system. These analyses were modeled under future year 2034 demand conditions without planned reductions from conservation to ensure that the improvements are sized sufficiently to meet the most stringent requirements anticipated in the future. The results of the fire flow analyses with planned improvements are summarized in Table 8-6. These results highlight that fire flows are significantly increased with the proposed water main improvements. A description of the planned improvements and a figure exhibiting their location is presented in Chapter 9. Table 8-6 shows that some areas are anticipated to have a minor decrease in available fire flows in the future. The increase in residential demands from 2014 to 2034 caused some areas to see a small reduction in available fire flows, but did not create any fire flow deficiencies. 15-1662 Page 8-10 J Packet Pg. 233 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Table 8-6 Fire Flow Analysis Summary Available Fire Flow (gpm) at 20 psi Target Existing Future System Description Approximate Location Pressure Zone Fire Flow i System with Improvements 1 (gpm) Swedish Medical 216th St SW & 73rd PI 596 2,661 8,112 5,000 Center W Commercial Area 76th Ave SW 242nd St 596 1,404 4,415 3,000 Multi -Family 196th St SW & 80th Ave Residential / W 596 1,544 3,765 3,000 Condominium Area Single Family 89th PI W, North of 596 392 1 567 1,000 Residential Area 200th St SW ' Multi -Family 83rd Ave W & 596 2,335 4,422 3,000 Residential Area Woodlake Dr Single Family 182nd PI SW, East of 505 392 1,567 1,000 Residential Area 88th Ave W Single Family 90th Ave W, south of 505 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area 184th St SW Single Family Glen St & IOth Ave N 420 392 2,168 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Excelsior PI & 94th PI 420 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Glen St & 9th Ave N 420 494 2,053 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Main St & Olympic Ave 486 866 1,550 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Main St & 1Oth Ave S 486 873 1,557 1,000 Residential Area Single Family 7th Ave S & Elm PI 486 875 1,560 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Meadowdale Beach Rd 500 866 1,550 1,000 Residential Area & 74th PI W Single Family Meadowdale Beach Rd 500 861 1,544 1,000 Residential Area & 169th PI Single Family Sound View Dr & 176th 425 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area St SW Single Family Soundview Drive, South 425 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area of 176th St SW Multi -Family 4th Ave S & Edmonds Residential / Wa y 325 1,567 3,525 3,000 Condominium Area Edmonds Viewland Way & 325 2,313 3,740 3,000 Elementary School Olympic Ave ' Fire flows shown are from a single fire hydrant. Higher flows are commonly available from nearby hydrants Seepage 8-9 for more information. 15-1662 Page 8-11 J Packet Pg. 234 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS System Capacity System capacity analyses were performed to determine the maximum number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) that the system can serve, based on an independent evaluation of each component of the City's water system. A separate analysis was performed for the existing system with year 2014 demand levels and the future system with year 2034 projected demand levels. The results of these analyses provide the City with information to ensure sufficient capacity is available when reviewing applications for new connections to the water system. Determination of Adequate Water Supply for New Buildings By law, governments cannot issue a building permit until water is available for the applicant's property. The requirement for providing evidence of an adequate water supply was codified in 1990 under Title 19.27.097 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) in the Building Code Section. To assist governments with implementing these requirements, the Department of Health has developed a handbook, entitled Guidelines for Determining Water Availability for New Buildings. A public water system will issue a "Certificate of Water Availability," or similar document, during the building permit review process when there is sufficient water supply to meet the domestic water service and the fire flow requirements of the applicant's proposed project. Analysis Criteria The capacity of the City's water system and the ability to serve additional customers is based on the limiting capacity of either supply or storage, whichever is associated with the least ERUs. The analysis of supply was computed from the Alderwood Supply Station capacity and the system's peak day demand per ERU. The analysis of storage was computed from the total usable capacity of the storage facilities and the storage requirement per ERU. The storage requirement per ERU was determined from the existing storage requirement presented in this chapter and the existing ERUs presented in Chapter 4. Existing System Capacity Analysis Results The results of the existing system capacity analysis, as shown in Table 8-7, indicate that the existing system has sufficient capacity to serve an additional 3,393 ERUs. Table 8-7 also shows the storage component is the limiting facility of the system. 15-1662 Page 8-12 J Packet Pg. 235 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Table 8-7 Existing (2014) System Capacity Analysis Demands Per ERU Basis Average Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 201 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Peak Hour Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 725 Supply Capacity Limiting Supply Rate - AWWD Supply Station (gal/day) 10,080,000 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Maximum Supply Capacity (ERUs) 25,043 Storage Capacity Maximum Storage Capacity (gal) 6,540,153 Storage Requirement Per ERU (gal) 361 Maximum Storage Capacity (ERUs) 18,123 Maximum System Capacity Based on Limiting Facility - Storage 18,123 Available System Capacity Maximum System Capacity (ERUs) 18,123 Existing (2014) ERUs 14,729 Available System Capacity (ERUs) 3,393 Future System Capacity Analysis Results The results of the 20-year projected system capacity analysis, as shown in Table 8-8, indicate that the water system in the year 2034 will have sufficient capacity to serve an additional 1,889 ERUs. Again, storage is the limiting facility for the system capacity. 15-1662 Page 8-13 J Packet Pg. 236 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Table 8-8 20-Year (2034) Projected System Capacity Analysis Demands Per ERU Basis Average Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 201 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Peak Hour Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 725 Supply Capacity Limiting Supply Rate - AWWD Supply Station (gal/day) 10,080,000 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Maximum Supply Capacity (ERUs) 25,043 Storage Capacity Maximum Storage Capacity (gal) 6,540,153 Storage Requirement Per ERU (gal) 356 Maximum Storage Capacity (ERUs) 18,389 Maximum System Capacity Based on Limiting Facility - Storage 18,389 Available Sys em Capacity Maximum System Capacity (ERUs) 18,389 Projected (2034) ERUs 16,500 Available System Capacity (ERUs) 1,889 15-1662 Page 8-14 J Packet Pg. 237 7.1.a CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Introduction This chapter presents water system improvements that the City of Edmonds (City) plans to implement within the 20-year planning period to resolve existing system deficiencies and meet the future demands of the water system. This chapter also presents criteria used for prioritizing the capital improvements, planning level project cost estimates, and an implementation schedule for the improvements. The water system improvements were identified from the results of the water system analyses, presented in Chapter 8, and have been sized to accommodate the projected demands that were established in Chapter 4. Description of Improvements This section provides a general description of capital improvements that have been completed since the last Comprehensive Water System Plan was prepared in 2010 and provides a brief description of the currently planned capital improvements. The water system improvements are shown schematically in Figure 9-1 and summarized in a table near the end of this chapter. The water system improvements for this Plan are grouped into the following categories, including: • Water Main Improvements • PRV Station and Pressure Relief Improvements • Facility Improvements, and • Other Improvements These improvements are presented following the discussion of improvements completed since 2010. Water System Improvements Completed Since 2009 The City has completed several water system improvements that were identified in the 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan. These include improvements to the Five Corners Site, pressure reducing station upgrades, rehabilitation of lift stations, extension of water services, and replacement of old and undersized water main. A summary of water system improvements completed since 2009 is shown in Table 9-1. 15-1662 Page 9-1 J Packet Pg. 238 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-1 Water System Improvements Completed Since 2009 Water Projects 2009 to Present Year completed Lift Station #7 & #8 Rehabilitation* 2009 Sound Transit Station* 2010 2010 Waterline Replacement 2011 2011 Waterline Replacement 2011 Woodway Waterline Extension/Replacement 2011 203' Waterline Replacement 2011 Lift Station #2 Rehabilitation* 2011 Shell Valley Access Road Water Main 2011 Main St Waterline Extension (near ferry terminal) 2011 Stonebridge Development* 2011 2012 Waterline Replacement 2012 Lift Station #14 Rehabilitation* 2012 76' Ave Waterline Replacement 2012 2013 Waterline Replacement 2013 Shoreshire Development* 2013 224' Waterline Replacement 2013 Main Street Improvements* 2013 2014 Waterline Replacement 2014 Five Corners Roundabout* 2014 Sewerline Replacement Project, Phase 1 * 2014 Sewerline Replacement Project, Phase 2* 2014 Swedish Medical Center Expansion Projects* 2014 2015 Waterline Replacement 2015 2016 Waterline Replacement 2016 2017 Waterline Replacement 2017 *Projects included portions of water main replacements. Water Main Improvements The following water main improvements were identified from the results of the distribution system analyses presented in Chapter 8 and from the City's list of planned projects. CIP WMI. Annual Water Main Replacement Program Deficiency: Most of the water mains to be replaced within this ongoing program are aging, undersized water mains that do not provide adequate fire flow to meet current requirements. Much of this water main is older, cast iron pipe and some areas have had occurrences of 15-1662 Page 9-2 J Packet Pg. 239 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS leaks or breaks. Water main improvement projects previously identified in the City's 2010 CIP program have been carried forward and are included within this CIP project. Improvement: Replace existing water main with new ductile iron pipe in accordance with the City's construction standards. The individual water main improvements grouped under this project are shown in Figure 9-2. Information on the individual projects, including proposed water main size, location, and project cost estimate is presented later in this chapter, in Table 9-6. The selection of specific projects will be accomplished annually during the City's budget development process and will be guided by the prioritization presented later in this chapter. This provides the City with the flexibility to coordinate projects that may occur within the same area(s). The projects will include replacing water main appurtenances such as isolation valves, fire hydrants, blow -off assemblies, air release/vacuum relief assemblies and water services. PRV Station and Pressure Relief Improvements The following PRV station improvements and pressure relief improvements include new facilities, abandoning old facilities, and improvements to existing facilities. CIP PRV1: PRV Station 13 Replacement (88th Ave W and 185th St SW) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life. Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. CIP PRV2. PRV Station 14 Replacement (188th St W and 89th Ave W) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. CIP PRV3: PRV Station 15 Replacement (192nd St SW) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. CIP PRV4. PRV Station 16 Replacement (12th Ave N and Viewland Way) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life. Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. 15-1662 Page 9-3 J Packet Pg. 240 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CIP PRV5: Annual PRV Station Improvements Program Deficiency: Several of the existing PRV stations are anticipated to reach the end of their useful service life during this Plan's 20-year planning period. Other PRV stations require minor improvements to ensure long-term operation and reliability. Improvement: Annually improve or replace PRV stations throughout the system. The City will evaluate needs and select one or more PRV stations to be improved each year. Facility Improvements The following water system facility projects consist of improvements to existing facilities to improve operation, increase capacity, or to ensure long-term performance of the facility. CIP F1: Five Corners Reservoir Improvements Deficiency: A seismic and structural evaluation determined that both the 1.5 MG and 3.0 MG Five Corners Reservoirs lack sufficient freeboard. In addition, both the steel reservoirs were last coated (interior and exterior) in 1994. Based on the typical life of coating on steel reservoirs, recoating is prescribed every 15 to 20 years. Finally, a facility evaluation completed in 2015 determined that both reservoirs have multiple appurtenance deficiencies. Improvement: Structural and seismic improvements including lowering the overflow piping inside both reservoirs, making roof improvements to the 1.5 MG reservoir, and replacing reservoir appurtenances to improve access, venting and overflow piping. The project also includes recoating the interior and exterior of the reservoirs. CIP F2: Yost Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement Deficiency: The piping inside of the reservoir is aging and reaching the end of its useful service life. Improvement: Replace piping inside of reservoir. CIP F3: Seaview Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement Deficiency: The piping inside of the reservoir is aging and reaching the end of its useful service life. Improvement: Replace piping inside of reservoir. 15-1662 Page 9-4 J Packet Pg. 241 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CIP F4: SPU Intertie & Emergency Intertie Improvements Deficiency: The SPU emergency intertie is not connected to a telemetry system and it is difficult to maintain due to its age. The City maintains a total of eleven emergency interties between the City of Lynnwood (five) and OVWSD (six). Ten of these interties do not have the ability to be flushed or metered. Further, they are not outfitted with telemetry equipment. Improvement: Install a new supply station with control valves, flow meters, and a telemetry system for the SPU Intertie. Upgrade the interties with flow meters, telemetry systems, and flushing infrastructure (e.g., fire hydrants or blowoff assemblies) for the ten identified emergency interties. Other Improvements The following improvements include a small pressure zone reconfiguration, and comprehensive planning. CIP M1: Pressure Zone Conversion (325 to 486) Deficiency: A small portion of the 325 Zone, bounded by 8th Ave S, 9th Ave S, Dayton St, and Maple St, has moderately low pressure. Improvement: Convert mains in the area to be served by the 486 Zone by constructing approximately 1,000 linear feet of water main and, if not already installed, adding PRVs on approximately 25 water services. The proposed water main connects the existing 486 Zone water main to the converted 325 Zone water main (12-in, Cast Iron) in Dayton St to the north, in Maple St to the south with water main running parallel to the 325 Zone main, in 8th Ave S to the west, and to existing 486 Zone water main in 91h Ave S to the east. The converted pressure zone impacts further north, to the southside of Main St. CIP M2. Comprehensive Water System Plan Update Deficiency: The City is required to update its Comprehensive Water System Plan every ten years and submit to the Department of Health for review and approval. Drinking water regulations are continuously changing and must be addressed in the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan. Improvement: Update the Comprehensive Water System Plan every ten years to meet the requirements that are in effect at the time of the update and to provide the City with an updated plan for implementing water system improvements. 15-1662 Page 9-5 J Packet Pg. 242 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Project Cost Estimates Project costs were estimated for each of the planned improvements and are presented in 2016 dollars. The planning level project cost estimates include the estimated construction cost and indirect costs. The construction cost estimate portion includes all construction related costs, sales tax and a 10 percent contingency. The indirect cost portion is estimated at 35 percent of the construction cost and includes engineering (preliminary design, final design, and construction management services), surveying, permitting, legal, construction inspection, and administrative services. For projects identified within the downtown area, an additional 20 percent contingency was added to reflect traditionally higher construction costs in the downtown area. Water Main Cost Estimates Construction costs for water main projects were estimated using the water main unit costs (i.e., cost per foot length) shown in Table 9-2. The unit cost of construction for each water main size is based on estimates of all construction -related improvements, which include materials and labor for the water main installation, water services, fire hydrants, fittings, valves, connections to the existing system, trench restoration, full -width roadway asphalt overlay, and other work for a complete installation. The indirect cost component is not included in the water main unit costs shown in Table 9-2. Table 9-2 Water Main Unit Costs for Construction Water Main Diameter (inches) Construction Cost per Foot Length (2016 $$/LF)1 8 $310 12 $360 16 $420 'An additional 20 percent was applied to project costs located in Downtown Edmonds. Unit Costs include all Construction Costs, Sales Tax, and a 10 percent Contingency. Construction Costs include all materials and labor for the water main installation, water services, fire hydrants, fittings, valves, connections to the existing system, trench restoration, full roadway width asphalt surface overlay, and other work for a complete installation. Other Project Costs not included in the Construction Unit Costs are estimated at 35 percent of the Construction Cost and represents engineering (preliminary design, final design, and construction management services), surveying, permitting, legal, and administrative fees. Prioritizing Improvements The planned improvements were prioritized using established criteria to help guide the City with scheduling and budgeting water system improvement projects in future years. A description of the criteria is provided below. 15-1662 Page 9-6 J Packet Pg. 243 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Prioritizing Water Main Improvements Table 9-3 shows the criteria used for prioritizing the water main improvements. The criteria are based on the existing water main deficiencies for each of the categories defined in the table, including existing fire flow capability, age (year of installation), and material. Each category is assigned a weight factor that reflects the relative importance of each category compared to the others. The Existing Water Main Fire Flow Capability category ranks the water main improvements based on the ability of the existing water mains to provide the required fire flow, as determined from the results of the hydraulic analyses presented in Chapter 8. The Existing Water Main Year of Installation and Existing Water Main Material categories rank the water main improvements based on the existing pipe age and material. The water main priority ranking criteria was applied to each water main improvement project, which resulted in a total ranking score for each project. For CIP projects with multiple pipes, the average priority point was assigned to the CIP project. The results of the priority ranking are summarized in Table 9-4 according to the CIP number. Table 9-5 presents the results in an order that is sorted according to total ranking points. Table 9-3 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring Criteria Points —F� Category Weight Factor Weighted Points Existing Water Main Fire Flow Capability 3 Available Fire Flow is 69% of Target Fire Flow or Less 4 12 2 Available Fire Flow is 70% to 80% of Target Fire Flow 4 8 1 Available Fire Flow is 8 1 % of Target Fire Flow or Greater 4 4 Existing Water Main Year of Installation 6 <1950 2 12 3 1950 - 1970 2 6 1 >1970 2 2 Existing Water Main Material 4 Steel 2 8 2 Cast Iron 2 4 0 Ductile Iron 2 0 0 HDPE 2 0 15-1662 Page 9-7 J Packet Pg. 244 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by CIP Number Prior it , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 3' 4 3 5 12 5' 8 4 0 12 6' 8 0 0 8 7' 12 0 6 18 9' 0 4 0 4 14' 0 1 0 1 15' 6 1 0 7 16' 8 2 1 12 18' 3 3 0 6 20' 6 4 3 13 21' 1 3 3 7 24' 4 4 0 8 25' 4 0 6 10 26' 8 4 0 12 27' 4 4 6 14 28' 8 2 0 10 29' 4 4 0 8 30' 4 0 0 4 32' 8 4 6 18 33' 4 4 0 8 34' 4 4 6 14 35' 4 0 6 10 36' 12 4 0 16 37' 8 0 0 8 38' 8 4 6 18 39' 4 4 0 8 40' 4 4 0 8 41' 5 2 1 8 43' 4 4 6 14 44' 2 4 0 6 46' 8 4 0 12 48' 12 0 0 12 49' 4 4 0 8 50' 2 2 6 10 53' 8 0 0 8 56' 0 4 0 4 57' 4 4 0 8 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-8 J Packet Pg. 245 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by CIP Number (continued) CIP Priori , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 58' 5 4 4 13 60' 5 3 4 12 61' 0 2 3 5 65' 8 2 0 10 66' 0 4 0 4 67' 12 3 9 24 73' 1 1 1 3 75' 2 2 0 3 76' 2 4 0 6 78' 0 3 2 5 81' 0 4 0 4 82' 8 4 0 12 83' 0 4 3 7 84' 12 4 0 16 92' 0 0 3 3 96' 12 0 0 12 99' 12 4 0 16 108' 1 4 8 13 109' 4 4 6 14 110' 0 4 12 16 111' 0 4 12 16 112' 0 4 12 16 113' 0 4 12 16 114' 0 4 12 16 115' 0 4 12 16 116' 2 4 12 18 117' 0 4 12 16 118' 0 4 12 16 119' 0 4 12 16 120' 0 4 12 16 121' 0 4 12 16 122' 2 4 11 16 123' 0 4 12 16 124' 0 4 12 16 125' 0 4 12 16 127 8 0 0 8 128 8 2 6 16 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-9 J Packet Pg. 246 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by CIP Number (continued) CIP Priori , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 129 0 0 12 12 130 12 0 0 12 131 4 0 0 4 132 8 0 0 8 133 4 0 0 4 134 4 0 0 4 135 12 0 0 12 136 8 0 6 14 137 10 4 0 14 138 4 2 3 9 139 10 4 0 14 140 12 0 0 12 141 5 1 2 9 142 4 0 0 4 143 0 0 6 6 144 6 2 0 8 145 0 4 12 16 15-1662 Page 9-10 J Packet Pg. 247 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by Total Points CIP Priority, Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 67' 12 3 9 24 32' 8 4 6 18 38' 8 4 6 18 116' 2 4 12 18 7' 12 0 6 18 122' 2 4 11 16 84' 12 4 0 16 99' 12 4 0 16 110' 0 4 12 16 111' 0 4 12 16 112' 0 4 12 16 113' 0 4 12 16 114' 0 4 12 16 115' 0 4 12 16 117' 0 4 12 16 118' 0 4 12 16 119' 0 4 12 16 120' 0 4 12 16 121' 0 4 12 16 123' 0 4 12 16 124' 0 4 12 16 125' 0 4 12 16 36' 12 4 0 16 128 8 2 6 16 145 0 4 12 16 137 10 4 0 14 109' 4 4 6 14 139 10 4 0 14 27' 4 4 6 14 34' 4 4 6 14 43' 4 4 6 14 136 8 0 6 14 58' 5 4 4 13 108' 1 4 8 13 20' 6 4 3 13 5' 8 4 0 12 26' 8 4 0 12 46' 8 4 0 12 48' 12 0 0 12 82' 8 4 0 12 96' 12 0 0 12 129 0 0 12 12 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-11 J Packet Pg. 248 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by Total Points (continued) CIP Prior it , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 135 12 0 0 12 130 12 0 0 12 140 12 0 0 12 16' 8 2 1 12 60' 5 3 4 12 3' 4 3 5 12 50' 2 2 6 10 28' 8 2 0 10 65' 8 2 0 10 25' 4 0 6 10 35' 4 0 6 10 138 4 2 3 9 141 5 1 2 9 41' 5 2 1 8 144 6 2 0 8 132 8 0 0 8 6' 8 0 0 8 37' 8 0 0 8 24' 4 4 0 8 29' 4 4 0 8 33' 4 4 0 8 39' 4 4 0 8 40' 4 4 0 8 49' 4 4 0 8 53' 8 0 0 8 57' 4 4 0 8 127 8 0 0 8 15' 6 1 0 7 83' 0 4 3 7 21' 1 3 3 7 18' 3 3 0 6 44' 2 4 0 6 76' 2 4 0 6 143 0 0 6 6 61' 0 2 3 5 78' 0 3 2 5 134 4 0 0 4 142 4 0 0 4 133 4 0 0 4 9' 0 4 0 4 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-12 J Packet Pg. 249 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by Total Points (continued) CIP Priority, Wei hted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 30' 4 0 0 4 56' 0 4 0 4 66' 0 4 0 4 81' 0 4 0 4 131 4 0 0 4 75' 2 2 0 3 73' 1 1 1 3 92' 0 0 3 3 14' 0 1 0 1 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward Prioritizing Other Improvements All other improvements were prioritized based on project need, maintenance requirements, existing deficiencies, capacity requirements, and reliability considerations. The results of the priority ranking of the water main and all other improvements were used to schedule the improvements, as presented in the section that follows. Schedule of Improvements All water main projects are shown in Table 9-6, which includes a breakdown of each project along with the proposed pipe size, location, and estimated project cost. The estimated project costs are based on 2016 dollars and include all costs (engineering, construction and other costs). The selection and implementation of the water main projects will be accomplished annually by the City, utilizing both the priority ranking information presented earlier in this plan and other information to ensure projects representing the greatest need are completed first. For example, water main projects in an area with low fire flow are a high priority and will be scheduled before projects in a low priority area. Examples of additional information that would be used to establish the annual project list include, but are not limited to, upcoming City and private sector utility projects and City or State transportation projects to be constructed in the same rights -of -way as water main projects. The process would also consider the effect that water main improvements installed as part of private property development projects would have on fire flows, which may change the priorities of projects on the list of annual water main replacements. This approach provides the City with the flexibility to coordinate water main projects with other projects planned for the same area to capture efficiencies and reduce project costs. 15-1662 Page 9-13 J Packet Pg. 250 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS The water main projects will be implemented under the Annual Water Main Replacement Program, which is identified as project WM1 in Table 9-7. An annual budget allowance has been established for this ongoing program, as shown in the table. The implementation schedule shown in Table 9-7 includes the previously described water main improvements and all other improvements described earlier in this chapter that are planned in the next 20 years. The implementation schedule will be used by the City to assist in the planning and budgeting of capital improvement projects for the Water Utility. The project cost estimates shown in the table are based on 2016 dollars for all years shown. These cost estimates will be adjusted by the City at the time of project implementation to include an escalation factor that represents inflation and the construction market conditions anticipated at the actual time of construction. The financial program in Chapter 10 describes in more detail the escalation factor to be used for future project cost adjustments. 15-1662 Page 9-14 J Packet Pg. 251 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects CIP Size I Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From To Project Cost 650 8 68th Ave 172nd St Dead-end $272,000 520 8 67th Ave 172nd St Dead-end $218,000 3' 280 8 172nd St 67th Ave 68th Ave $117,000 500 8 172nd St Olympic View Drive 67th Ave $209,000 240 8 81 st Ave W 206th St SW Dead-end $100,000 51 320 8 81st Ave 206th St Dead-end $134,000 240 8 Sea Lawn Dr 171st St SW Dead-end $100,000 61 590 8 Sea Lawn Dr 171st St Dead-end $247,000 7' 2,090 8 Lake Ballinger 76th Ave Dead-end $875,000 9' 220 8 217th St SW 96th Ave W 95th Ave $92,000 410 12 81 st PI 212th St Dead-end $199,000 330 12 208th PI 82nd Ave 80th Ave $160,000 14' 540 12 82nd Ave 208th PI Dead-end $262,000 730 8 208th PI 82nd Ave 80th Ave $306,000 420 12 83rd Ave W Woodlake Dr. 208th St SW $204,000 310 12 81 st PI W - Dead-end $151,000 15' 320 12 83rd Ave W - Woodlake Dr $156,000 120 12 Woodlake Dr 84th Ave W 83rd Ave W $58,000 820 12 83rd Ave 84th Ave 82nd Ave $399,000 1,110 12 Lake Baallinger Hwy 99 McAleer Way $539,000 500 12 SR 104 Hwy 99 - $243,000 16' 290 12 - SR 104 242nd St $141,000 640 12 McAleer Way 242nd St Lake Ballinger Way $311,000 840 12 242nd St - McAleer Way $408,000 390 8 175th St SW 76th Ave W Dead-end $163,000 370 8 176th St 76th Ave Sound View Way $155,000 18' 300 8 Sound View Way 176th St Sound View Dr $126,000 880 8 175th St 76th Ave Dead-end $368,000 80 12 216th St SW 73rd PI W - $39,000 140 12 76th Ave W - 215th St SW $68,000 470 12 76th Ave W - - $228,000 340 12 76th Ave W 212th St SW - $165,000 20' 150 12 216th St SW - - $73,000 120 16 216th St SW 73rd PI W - $68,000 830 12 215th St 76th Ave 73rd PI $403,000 480 12 73rd PI 216th St 215th St $233,000 560 12 Stevens Hospital - - $272,000 100 12 76th Ave W - 220th St SW $49,000 60 12 76th Ave W 220th St SW - $29,000 310 12 76th Ave 219th St 220th St $151,000 21' 350 12 76th Ave 218th St 219th St $170,000 390 12 76th Ave 218thSt - $190,000 300 12 76th Ave - 216th St $146,000 230 12 76th Ave 215th St - $112,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-15 J Packet Pg. 252 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From To Project Cost 680 8 172nd St 72nd Ave 74th Ave $285,000 241 310 8 173rd St 72nd Ave 73rd PI $130,000 25' 660 8 176th St 72nd Ave Dead-end $276,000 290 8 179th St SW 72nd Ave W Dead-end $121,000 261 350 8 179th St 72nd Ave Dead-end $146,000 27' 750 8 80th Pl 212th St Dead-end $314,000 460 8 80th Pl W 200th St SW Dead-end $193,000 28' 690 8 80th PI 200th St Dead-end $289,000 29' 550 8 1 86th PI Maplewood Ln Dead-end $230,000 30' 620 8 198th PI Maplewood Ln Dead-end $259,000 260 8 12th PI N 12th Ave N Dead-end $109,000 321 280 8 12th PI N 12th Ave - $117,000 33' 360 8 185th PI 92nd Ave Dead-end $151,000 341 570 8 186th PI 92nd Ave Dead-end $239,000 35' 670 8 - 184th St Dead-end $280,000 36' 630 8 182nd PI 88th Ave Dead-end $264,000 520 8 74th PI Meadowdale Beach Rd - $218,000 37' 520 8 74th PI Meadowdale Beach Rd Dead-end $218,000 210 8 104th PI SW 72nd Ave W Dead-end $88,000 38' 320 8 164th PI 72nd Ave Dead-end $134,000 39' 1 820 8 192nd PI 80th Ave Dead-end $343,000 40' 1 830 8 Main St Olympic Ave - $347,000 310 8 Ol is Ave Glen ST Dale St $130,000 660 8 Glen St Olympic Ave 1 Oth Ave $276,000 41' 380 8 Olympic Ave Sierra PI Glen St $159,000 350 8 9th Ave N Glen St Dale St $146,000 1,270 8 Daley St Olympic Ave 9th Ave $531,000 43' 430 8 179th PI Talbot Rd Dead-end $180,000 640 8 Sound View Pi Wharf St Dead-end $268,000 44' 400 8 Wharf St Sound View PI Olympic View Dr $167,000 420 8 Water St Sound View Dr Ocean Ave $176,000 461 660 8 Ocean Ave Water St Dead-end $276,000 48' 640 8 Puget Ln 8th Ave Dead-end $268,000 49' 380 8 Brookmere Dr 8th Ave Dead-end $159,000 490 12 - 3rd Ave Dale St $238,000 50' 1,180 8 3rd Ave Cas ers St - $494,000 53' 580 8 High St 183rd PI Dead-end $243,000 56' 550 8 86th PI W 188th St SW Dead-end $230,000 57' 670 8 170th PI Olympic View Dr Dead-end $280,000 500 8 Soundview Dr 72nd Ave W Dead-end $209,000 58' 290 8 Sound View Dr Sound View Ln Dead-end $121,000 200 8 177th St 72nd Ave Sound View Ln $84,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-16 J Packet Pg. 253 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Des cri tion Estimated No. Length Diamilimm From � M&- Project Cost 490 12 196th St 80th Ave 81st PI $238,000 620 12 196th St 82nd PI 84th Ave $301,000 60* 270 12 196th St 81st PI 82nd PI $131,000 520 12 192nd St 80th Ave 83rd Ave $253,000 20 12 - 80th Ave W 196th St SW $10,000 710 12 196th St 86th Ave 88th Ave $345,000 * 650 12 196th St 84th Ave 86th Ave $316,000 61 440 12 194th St 88th Ave 89th PI $214,000 680 12 88th Ave 196th St 194th St $330,000 920 12 4th Ave S Dead-end Pine St $447,000 65* 340 12 Pine St 4th Ave S 5th Ave S $165,000 66* 620 8 69th PI 174th St 176th St $259,000 500 8 Sunset Ave N Cas ers St - $209,000 300 12 Railroad Ave Main St Dead-end $146,000 67* 560 12 Sunset Ave Edmonds St - $272,000 1,070 8 Sunset Ave Edmonds St Cas ers St $448,000 670 8 76th Ave W 228th St SW 230 St SW $280,000 1,380 16 Pacific Highway 76th Ave W 230th St SW $782,000 780 12 Pacific Highway 224th St SW 76th Ave W $379,000 73* 130 12 - Hwy 99 76th Ave $63,000 600 12 76th Ave - 228th St $292,000 880 12 76th Ave Hwy 99 224th St $428,000 450 12 Private Property 212th St 213th PI $219,000 250 8 216th St SW 73rd PI W - $105,000 75* 310 8 216th St SW - - $130,000 180 8 72nd Ave W 213th PI SW N/A $75,000 290 8 72nd Ave W N/A 216th St SW $121,000 580 12 Olympic Ave Main St Maple St $282,000 76* 90 8 - Olympic Ave Main St $38,000 40 12 Main St 9th Ave S - $19,000 330 12 9th Ave S Main St Dayton St $160,000 78* 300 12 9th Ave Maple St Dayton St $146,000 630 12 9th Ave Main St Edmonds St $306,000 81 * 650 8 Puget Way 8th Ave 9th Ave $272,000 330 12 Viewland Way Olympic Ave Dead-end $160,000 82* 380 12 - Viewland Way Brookmere St $185,000 700 8 Puget Way 9th Ave N Dead-end $293000 580 8 Emerald Hill Dr/Highland Dr 12th Ave N Highland Dr $243:000 83* 320 8 12th Ave N Emerald Hills Dr Main St $134,000 84* 280 12 77th PI 195th St 196th St $136,000 850 8 81st PI W 196th St - $356,000 92* 500 8 81st PI W - 200th St SW $209,000 96* 340 8 92nd PI W Bowdoin Way Dead-end $142,000 99* 360 8 215th PI SW 96th Ave W Dead-end $151,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-17 J Packet Pg. 254 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From Project Cost 290 8 8th Ave N Edmonds St Bell St $121,000 108* 470 8 Bell St 8th Ave N 9th Ave N $197,000 280 8 7th Ave N Edmonds St Bell St $117,000 600 8 Main St 8th Ave N 9th Ave N $251,000 109* 640 12 Main St 7th Ave N 8th Ave N $311,000 110* 330 8 Main St 8th Ave S Durbin St $138,000 * 310 12 Dayton St Durbin St 7th Ave N $151,000 111 1,010 12 Da on St 5th Ave S Durbin St $491,000 160 8 7th Ave S Cedar St Magnolia Dr $67,000 300 8 7th Ave S Walnut St Cedar St $126,000 112* 270 12 7th Ave S Dayton St Maple St $131,000 290 12 7th Ave S Maple St Alder St $141,000 300 12 7th Ave Alder St Walnut St $146,000 150 8 Hemlock St 7th Ave S 8th Ave S $63,000 113* 570 8 7th Ave S Spruce St Laurel St $239,000 340 12 7th Ave N Edmonds St Main St $165,000 300 12 5th Ave S Maple St Alder St $146,000 114* 270 12 5th Ave S Dayton St Maple St $131,000 300 12 5th Ave S Alder St Walnut St $146,000 380 8 6th Ave N - Bell St $159,000 115* 250 8 6th Ave N Sprague St - $105,000 290 8 6th Ave N Daley St Sprague St $121,000 640 8 Bell St 6th Ave N 7th Ave N $268,000 116* 470 8 Bell St 5th Ave N 6th Ave N $197,000 380 8 5th Ave N Edmonds St Bell St $159,000 117* 460 8 5th Ave N Bell St Main St $193,000 118* 880 8 4th Ave N Edmonds St Main St $368,000 119* 870 8 3rd Ave N Edmonds St Main St $364,000 120* 870 8 2nd Ave N Edmonds St Main St $364,000 121 * 870 8 Sunset Ave N Edmonds St Main St $364,000 480 8 Sprague St 4th Ave N 6th Ave N $201,000 340 8 Edmonds St 4th Ave N 5th Ave N $142,000 310 8 Edmonds St 3rd Ave N 4th Ave N $130,000 330 8 Edmonds St 2nd Ave N 3rd Ave N $138,000 122* 310 8 Edmonds St Sunset Ave N 2nd Ave N $130,000 390 12 Daley St 3rd Ave N 4th Ave N $190,000 90 12 Daley St 4th Ave N 6th Ave N $44,000 560 8 3rd Ave N - - $234,000 200 12 3rd Ave N Daley St Edmonds St $97,000 123* 1,630 8 2nd Ave N Edmonds St Dead-end $682,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-18 J Packet Pg. 255 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From To Project Cost 30 12 Main St Sunset Ave N Sunset Ave S $15,000 40 8 Main St 5th Ave N Dead-end $17,000 300 12 Main St 4th Ave N 5th Ave N $146,000 1241 310 12 Main St 3rd Ave N 4th Ave N $151,000 320 12 Main St 2nd Ave N 3rd Ave N $156,000 320 12 Main St Sunset Ave N 2nd Ave N $156,000 140 12 Main St James St Dead-end $68,000 125' 400 8 Sunset Ave S Main St James St $167,000 127 740 8 N Meadowdale Rd 72nd Ave W 163rd PI SW $310,000 230 8 Meadowdale Beach Rd 169th PI SW - $96,000 128 810 8 Meadowdale Beach Rd 74th PI W 169th PI SW $339,000 129 810 8 Sunset Way Olympic View Dr 184th St SW $339,000 130 700 12 Olympis View Dr 76th Ave W Homeview Dr $340,000 131 480 8 94th PI W - Puget Dr $201,000 132 450 8 89th PI W 200th St SW Dead-end $188,000 133 340 12 3rd Ave S James St Dayton St $165,000 134 500 12 Admiral Way Dayton St - $243,000 135 880 12 4th Ave S Dayton St Walnut St $428,000 136 150 8 1Oth Ave S Maple Way Maple St $63,000 220 12 212th St SW 70th Ave W Pacific Highway $107,000 137 660 12 Pacific Hiahway 208th St SW 212th St SW $321,000 1,240 12 Pine St Nootka Rd 2nd Ave S $603,000 138 490 12 Pine St 2nd Ave S 3rd Ave S $238,000 770 8 218th St SW 80th Ave W 77th PI W $322,000 139 570 12 218th St SW 77th PI W 76th Ave W $277,000 140 230 8 7th Ave S Elm St Elm PI $96,000 120 12 224th St SW 73rd PI W 141 280 12 224th St SW 72nd PI W - $136,000 470 12 224th St SW Pacific Highway 73rd PI W $228,000 800 8 236th St SW Pacific Highway 78th Ave W $335,000 142 170 8 236th St SW 78th Ave W 78th Ave W $71,000 143 40 12 238th St SW Pacific Highway - $19,000 70 12 76th Ave W 242nd St SW 242nd PI SW $34,000 144 620 12 76th Ave W 242nd PI SW N 205th St $301,000 396 12 Da on St 2nd Ave S 3rd Ave S $192,000 145 476 12 Dayton St 3rd Ave S 4th Ave S $232,000 211 12 Dayton St 4' Ave S 5th Ave S $103,000 Total Waterline Main Improvements $43,874,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-19 J Packet Pg. 256 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-7 Planned Improvements Implementation Schedule NIP No. Description Estimated Cost (2016 $$) 20-Year Schedule of Improvements Planned Year of Project and Estimated Cost in 2016 $$ (x 1,000) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027-2035 Water Main Improvements WM1 Annual Water Main Replacement Program' $51,707,247 $3,801 $1,628 $2,248 $1,920 $2,960 $2,960 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $25,750 Subtotal Water Main Improvements $51,707,247 $3,801 $1,628 $2,248 $1,920 $2,960 $2,960 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $25,750 PRV Station & Pressure Relief Improvements PRV' PRV # 13 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRV2 PRV # 14 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRV3 PRV # 15 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRV4 PRV #16 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRVS Annual PRV Station Improvements Program $400,000 - - - - - - - - - - $400 Subtotal PRV Station & Relief Improvements $900,000 $0 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400 Facility Improvements F1 5 Corners Reservoir Improvements $1,813,000 - $1,813 - - - - - - - - - F2 Yost Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement $85,000 - - - $85 - - - - - - - F3 Seaview Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement $85,000 - - - $85 - - - - - - - F4 SPU Intertie & Emergency Interties Improvements $1,945,000 - - - $195 - - $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 Subtotal Facility Improvements $3,928,000 $0 $1,813 $0 $365 $0 $0 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 Other Improvements Ml 325 to 486 Pressure Zone Conversion $675,000 - - - $675 - - - - - - - M2 Comprehensive Water System Plan Update $215,000 $65 - - - - - - - - - $150 Subtotal Other Improvements $890,000 $65 $0 $0 $675 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150 Total All Improvements $57,425,247 $3,866 $3,941 $2,248 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $26,650 ' Given the longevity of the program, the budget amount for the Annual Water Main Replacement Program (CIP No. WMI) includes currently known replacement projects as well as an allowance for additional water main replacements that are not currently identified. 15-1662 Page 9-20 J Packet Pg. 257 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U r O N N t a+ CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 258 7.1.a FIGURE 9-1 G s Comprehensive Water System Plan 2010 - 2017 Water Main Improvements murraysmith June 2017 Legend p Emergency Intertie Existing Water Mains: A Pressure Reducing Station 325 Zone Water Main a6 1 Pump Station — 420 Zone Water Main d Reservoir 425 Zone Water Main IL Supply Station 486 Zone Water Main 0 Pressure Relief Facility 500 Zone Water Main City of Edmonds Retail 505 Zone Water Main Water Service Area 596 Zone Water Main Other Water Service Areas Year of Installation*• L _7 City Limits � 201 ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary — 2016 2015 — 2014 — 2013 2012 — 2011 — 2010 Puget Sound Pressure Relief #19 ,• 151ST —TH P J TSW I A LUND'S / \ ! GULCH Iti ALDERWOOD N 6TH WATER & 157T WASTEWATER 0 2,000 ITS < m DISTRICT �i 1 eTH ST SW Scale in Feet J� PRV #3— J! 161ST 16 HPL SW Pressure Relief#41 PLSW I 2ND Sr N° Emergency �I °� S Intertie with City p 45N Pit Lynnwood 573 Zc D Il E^DGW„�I Supply froi ieSTH Rp,D Lc 661H "" PRV #2 Alderwoo( PLSW q, Water Distri i" (635 Zone PzRV#V 166 ST SW I.•---�` p� s a r� N NS 1i WAY t82N0 T Io P A� Seaview a PRV #13 PRV #10 Reservoir,86TH 1ssTH (1.5 MG) ti STEM ,3TTH �o PRV #14 J Q J W SESh BLAKE P PL IrRPv cT P 5� PLSW J N STREAM ANf ¢ .60C(° ORE G F ELL IN •i�• 1 sic LAN S S ,y > P GE .' MELODY WAY r LANE .O H A E Y VIEWLA ED W. �y BROOKME DR P i0<CA IRS ST VIEW MOORPL ATER VISTA m MOUNTAIN LANE PL LANE CA5 AOE CASCADE DR LA E ALOH' WAV ALOHA ST CAROL WAY SIERI Lo IT - PRV #15 T CITY OF EDMONDSs PL 947H PL `5 a w V #23 a all. PRcVVI TAN#16PL I'- srsw _ 3 PRV #7 174TH ST sw-- 5TH P S ,SST e L 174TFI PL PRV #8 5TH ST Sw IiL S NOV' E i]]TH E aIT7TH`° 3 F� PLSW r..r YEe EE p GW N (D _ sw ,aoTH ST sw TS. Y sw 1815T PL SW i fazNDSTsw M1oGe w 1azND PL Q o � 1fl3Rp PL GW E ,', Sw �; Emergency Interties -H: o O U MP,°with City of Lynnwood 1851H. ti ( 573 Zone PLSW. o PRV #24 °s`OL _ T cV PRV #9 IIA 186TH PL SW PENNY LANE ''CTi 189TH O PLSW 190TH IT SW - ----------�. ii. l!• �.,91ST ITS,. � .p •L :. .. _. ..i > DALE c=1Uzz i.. �.b ki' WAY �I-1TT~T; i.J!-�L1�l.i.... �O PARK WAY e Z 194TH T "+! ,193RDSTSW PL 195T o ._:BFN1F _ IyI 195TM SW PLSW 9YTH 524 ''.TII �. P STSW _T 199TH �i• (V IT SW CITY OF wFgz,, `i LYNNWOOD SPRAGUE ST `" 205TH v 20 TH ST m ° PLSW R D S WY! r V PL SlH 03jN LL sT w PRV #18 HILL R �FPRV PL Sw sj s zos H PL sw MAIN IT #17 PLSW ST MAPLE - PLSW AY Yost u 209 H C 'r`.po� MAPLE ST Reservoir Five Corners 2 T "P W STS �.•�� ALDERST (1.5 MG)u pReservoirs and ALOUT �Q3 ,PumpStation ST RG(-JLO MG & a 21 "PLSW HOW jj I' WA ELL HOLLY M HOME ADND GNOLIA R a CEDA ST CEDAR L O Q- ePOP 1 D w U a Q' S PL 213T T S RpgoO 11 HEMLOC WAY HEMLOC LAU ST a EL WAV s LAN m O 6pWDOI 214TH WAY N LSVN` �1 E EN E LAURELS 215TH ST SW lI� LANE LANE POINT PINE ST 216TH 216TH sr W 'PLSW !H E- 1-1 P - I Emergency Intertie FORSVT E LAN j PL ICE 21TTH STSW w withWater p' ye < District �AWoodway 353 Zone Y E`Mw P8w 2'6TH .I S I+ —_ WHITCOMB PL IPRV #20- 1 SW =0T=5T 4, Emergency Interties t— Emergency Interties ' 'ET :..m I SW 221STF - h °°G,A with Olympic View, "R with Olympic View Vt °0 NUT Water District a Water District I WAY 1� j c/, a.s e — -- --� 415 Zone � 9P n0 14,F 505 Zone IT - �'I-.. Late 224TH _ ,.. o I Emergency Intertie F g ROAD 16TH" _r_' with Olympic View ---� °GW°DD ry �4 �' STSW + _ _ i strict 225THST5`Y/ 540 Low Water �Zone a p0 4-�--� - o ^ FO '•. 'ri0 0' ..i rTr T� i w 228TH ST SW ~ 1 a W "DEER DR 229TH PLSW ..... ...IT " l o °S�^. Y UNINCORPORATED b Pa Da �QIryl SNOHOMISH _• .. 232ND Ci _.41_ m L. ^i-- DI,I 5,,; 231s1ST,COUNTY oPo P4 Sw . �, w •232NI ST SW �� OLYMPIC VIEW GLLYLANE ---- �1233RDPLSW 1. -- TOWN OF P w °P wWATER & SEWER DISTRICTr�i;; a MAPLE . y P WOODWAY P _ I 235TH PLSW MADRO NA LANE 1�$—_ zaar TSW w 236TM A I F L 1-�'-�— I --PL F 3 SW 5 _ -... '.. `.STH ST SW J2 3 �2alHir"._..-,ii'• IHJ{n r��...LLL111 ? I� 23T'(H .... 238THST SW .® w 239TH 1 EY PLSW jo '?'� m� TssT".. oe £NI SW. CT_- '1. 2� 246TH m -• PLSW Ifs . ,240TH ST SW , -.lYQ��oP v ' x D I i-3 r3 w = EAGLE TOTEM 'ram . . 2a1ST PLSW ��TTTIII r-T I. LANE POLE 1 'a LANE i Standby Supply from J 242NDSTIW � 'r- 243RU BERRY 243RD PL SW STSI N a .� q Z I Seattle Public Utilities MP SNOHOMIS}I COUNTY (592 Zone) a The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information KING COUNTY displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Notification of any errors is appreciated. SEATTLE PUBLIC Source: City of Edmonds G S, Washington State Dept. of Health and UTILITIES Snohomish County GIS (March 2016). — I'll z�I' �f E 99 >, r-- --- 5W Emergency Interties r (U with City of Lynnwood 573 Zone - y STSW 9TH S t r -- I h i �. 212 STEW E 213 H PL W . =- � _ U r N 4� IN WANY E I_T_T1Tr_�._. � 1.I f lyi i., 219TH ST SW P$ () �.� -y1-_� �jJM- �zzznlD ST swl , 223RD FL S'N 225THS SW-- 225TH f+ r 'H PLSW �� PLSW 3 03 WQ mQ 22TT CITY OF "STSW MOUNTLAKEa W J TERRACE 1 �__ �' i�imt =_ I �. �I 'I ICI,, _ 70. �1 f_' • 233RD ST SW m • 235TH 3A _ ' STSW -�' - y 236TH' 65TH PL 1-5 STSW ALEE WAVr�' + Lake Ballinger NE ST ~ -I I vo 1 F" wa-11111I -0 !M'! i F!" .iii, NORTH CITY WATFH` I DIs Packet Pg. 259 7.1.a (D N N N C R a E a� U) L cu 0 i .N 0 0 L E 0 U ti r O N r C 0 E t V R r-+ r Q Packet Pg. 260 F.D,1g1Q FIGURE 9-2 G s Comprehensive Water System Plan Proposed Capital Improvements murraysmith June 2017 Legend ❑ Emergency Intertie © Pressure Reducing Station P6 Pump Station Reservoir El Supply Station 7 Pressure Relief Facility ® Zone Valve (Closed) City of Edmonds Retail Water Service Area �� ! Other Water Service Areas City Limits ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary Pressure Zones: 325 Zone 420 Zone 425 Zone 486 Zone 500 Zone 505 Zone 596 Zone O CIP Project ID Water Main Improvements: ....... 8.. ....... 12" FISHER EEOR- 151ST SEE SW 1662E , 3 *` �1 ALDERWOOD N Dm WATER & WASTEWATER 0 2,000 �8-DI m DISTRICT sTHSTSW 6W Scale in Feet +� j� 6"DI PRV #3 m e•DI w� Pressure Relief #41P, •8., Ta,Emergency Inter o 9Q DPEs,Y with City of /% - Lynnwood 573 Zc 6•DI �, 38 •. •.� ' I6 C s' S'.Y� F5 A �� D•' PRV #2 aD Supply frog Alderwoo( 66THP sv Water Distri • w >o (635 Zone 3T 6'DI PRV 4 nAe^4 g s v 12a r% � - 'ary � � •� 5z PRV .. �. ,♦♦.�..� s„ rr' _ � E9/F.. Tom: •• De'D�W�•Ji•••• 21 6"DI � Bp m l %2N � 1 rt ' f RC»ISYW � pl.• vs m m ® g.DI f PRV #7 ao 6"DI,BW 1"RT a°T R DI DAD TAIS _ Ew .a.. a.. e° 6'" aW L PC .T3 18 Hs w Y 66 FREDERICK • s;' I r PRV #8 ,• 18 `21 A. •� 25 6THs S d y a^cl 9• m 6TH PL SW V 1 0 .-- •• ','fQ 58 a DI G m 3 t e Ps aw � Qi f 14'll7/ O 0 6CI4 � 8.. •• � m � a+ m60 6G1 • - m ° 0•26 1]BTHQ�'s �//�1 y/ _ _ 6"CI e" 6'CI 16'HDPE 6"pl - ^cI L te6TH ST sv 9�PST6w b .a a"DI" 8'pl 6G ro 129�0' 9 .W2ND 4"DI 1 ND ST sw Ie1ST PE SW (�� Iq�• o • 36 s. PRV- 1a D1 m 8DI F5 III ST s �o o g�Y� a, #10 11_ °°EwA �� - m 3R� F3 6 �oE6W 53 5_ m O /! a;• - PRV #13 m ro, 2 ,3D a / Emergency Interties U e with City of Lynnwood rkiS,sw m. . o• - ... m 6T,� s ° ,2"p1,2•Dlry ,rDl ,2•pl ao ! Q Seaview 6 LL 6 w a on /� 2:�• Reservoir- PRV1 o I66THRTDW_ - �, "05 - �F a•• � � 73 Zone yy 44•• 34 ••• .... i. r-�. g6Ti1 PE5W m ° �I m PRV #14 _ H� 6DI 6•CI t PRV #24 F5 1.5aMG m g"DI aDI ,ggr.•®r W 6.0 II[C�]-il�� e Gi S I , y,• f' _ 1aaTHPisw PENNx AN FG7 M[Tl /cisaa ° h� BLAKEPL m a•DI ss ' s"DI s"pl PRV4 s9 HP sA PSHN.rwnE PRV3 I>r• � 5 - _ - - T �iLf'rT�-I lT�TT'IT�TT�� - m 6"CI t 4 ,982E ST SOW' i_ /• fO6 8'pl o 8'DI 8ro BjW,:,, B'DI. e'D m w m ITT +III LI�l�j 41��,1+{.l1{ 1 1-�-Lr •L ! s° e•C/ w0 _ ..T.. '°m 6'CI 4'DI 4I. 8 _ 1 _ lL, i6TT 6M —y-L.L'-i� l- P1 ST SW I 1.1 � DN-E Qi •••••• 16" 1, RS PRV #15 f LLLL9922NN � I�IZ•' /!' 4•pl fr[q •CQ� ' sIERR 39•• - p-,'T'.4{-+,1. '•i.'1:. 2 6 PAR% �' Dneea'"SraEV z Im° _ 94r�$L5'L - e•pI a•DI a"DI a"pI f lhit � i PARK ! CITY OF _I Ro'atawb v �' °U°ea•' - a'D?<s N sO 0 Ex Em K sroI EDMOND$ g�i a1s4n+ _ a•DI. J� 1 _ 11� ' 9•- •aa •m ;, Aa•DI e'DI °'FaT• 6'I �a•DI•i - g.. a 01131 • a a DI 0..... a ,z• so- ° 84 i ,ysz. RE— j 3 sw 4 YL DR .. a m �t '+ mO • pJ • • .�•... o • t96TH IT s'// I e•DI - a bd .6T 6rHPisW �m� a 524 _T _ a, m o rH : 3 a"DrINpTrtgN ,ti vlEw� m roI€6•DI PRVS _ - 6,gle srsw YN' -J �y ,i- 2 I_�rNo v m z9 m gr.grHs ••k28. -- �Ea� _ - -� N rPRV #23 6'C1 m92 m e N 2'RlpryiHlSfi'SYY' 6'DI I z O ° vl •• - m PRV - 30 u ° m : _ J— 1982E y��-�.{- 6'CI 0 6'CI G PF�D 49 8'Csm EWRMOOQ a2 VIST PSO,#16 13 12'DI 12'DI 12'DI12 W �2®IfFls SWf21•DI 6C CITY OF C'' -r(' LTI RL E SP-R c, P U g e f Pressure Relief#19Jp� ;�Iy�E6an®. "ST" .mo _ LYNNWOOD i !I (C �6W e �� so soero"vE aum/nw sPr uNE N `° a a•m z61sT Sound6, , " • o oB A P A a 'DI arol g•DI m m o �r L 3� ~. • _ 8'pd026ro1DLISv,6W • z a a _ �°' y�2 y,^ry : Lw 8!BFLEN 81p a 6rol Z8• 1EN ST •v • ,��•' � 'a�6 IE s /`66T" I6"Cb - b 6.°I m ° - _ 'DI m a'DI 'a'pl� - ¢I'.: __- 262ND ST sw 262ND ST SW m � Q� y ti�° ao � a•pI m - a.p, _ -- a:: 41 • 3"L �.••� • �S e...~ - •� • ° ° a w g D � g•DI m RD � TT � 0\ - _ 99 2 11E ST sw ,,>^^+ V! :i m 6PR5°DE m •: e�• Y .::: :T... u •Flw '.•°.. dam m 211,T��Fso 3 " - ' � P` '" - Emergency Interties - L iO• 80p:15 6•DI .m - Dg.�1m' - _ 6'HDPE _ Q 0 m 6p 6•pl m g•DI g•DI a•DIm 4-D with City of Lynnwood ._ r 573 Zone �F +� (Q ��) :� 8'• , 8 %q••?. �!•..': .....¢�usg.p' •• ryv�• PRV#18"[AA 12..m.•a... ,a' r:IUITa: • • • • o "' Grp o PRV 83�gP1 8-DI #47c '- 6TerowEsw m 3 6"DI 26,TH5 • _ O; = ti 66.W!SFSWV: 66rH 2L3W O a•cl ' •..3 L • •. �2�...1'. � T(,� 109 . 40 2 . M1 •,F'pl Yost - Q _ 8• ] 12'CI -' •(/� 4Rfga6 • cif ,35; a P ;T6Reservoir FiveCor-ners - p.psm 9 IV/ gDI c .��• �. w� ° (1.5 MG) Reservoir§land;- m "� m / ,^••A 'O, ry _ �� a'D p �1126,c 2DV V, 11 C - b•D116°s8 ' _ 00, 34 m �• ° g'°I6'° Y \m. F2 Pump Station(m•'• _ 6rHST �s F5 — N s•cl Ir :1' O L �� - a�, •m wl_ ° m m g.cl a"cl «(3.� MC-7.w!& - oug.®p g 4"DI a•DI- croAR s� zeDA 1�5-MG) FB 4a 12•CI 12•CI, cli:z"c zSiz•c ,rcl _ 1 �� ; Q• f2fAI a'DI ® o m O _ • 96 g - 2T 2"CI e"CI A"CI 8•Clm 8"CI e"CIS 13] �.�_11 , E m h R - EI AN❑pP m 113� •DI= seRRDEbssT ®1tl0o1/Yq ,, g"DI;-,m _ - o F1 roses nr �i4_9�� aMRMLOCKwAOY ,cam MDDi� m �° ro°^� m 6p1b • m 1 m� ._-I,� 2,4TH IIT EAN1 NCA CW m 4 4•D8D ° SV 8•Dt21•fI'iI.ln mI- .11� E °s. _ 1N5 SS S RIV Il e__66II��• 'APN'`IO6C 6•C 992,62E Sr SNk.°I °Ar2N■i R•6'pl m SDI 8'pl12'DI J -�■■■■�iii Fs s•a,rpu zo ! `�J] a Ie•D,�Rsv,�YEA .. W Pmergency Intertie • p _ Dlg•DI - - 2•p o _ 0—IrI�Tj �l �/9�� 139 3i - � ,dON.My with Olympic View 65 ° g ° - -3 u o m 6'D21ri N IT m 6'DI 6"pl gTgDRs 6•pl 6'DI 8 e"DI O£ Y k Water District - _ Woodway 353 Zone Va roI "EDP 6•DI - _ �J--_1�J, t --_ _ F u ry m • `,' LLLW_ 219THSSSW a'DI E m zry 140°I 6E a"HDP ry a•DI� g.�, R PRV #20 .P _ a•m �,2•c s!p6y 6•DI c g.p _ -`jj ff•�—��I� ! . , , � �`�2UTHSiSW a —__ Emergency lnterties Emergency,Interties ` W 22 THP�SE ^ju with Olympic View 4 with Olympic View 22,jts Water District F5 Water District j hale arol u _ Z A• 132E wgYP E 415 Zone 505 Zone7��It Lake F5 --I — a °°o _ g1 L' I.: 224TH Pz SW m--= m} 2 °/ . o �� °_Emergency Intertie "', , .. ..� � /6W� n4°-oR4'1° ",,'IT with Olympic View ._�� •141 _ �aDo1DDlp t..�..7 swa �a Water District--- —. l ° y �I— e W - _ _ 1 m 226THsraar 540 Low Zone �':• =" L!rf� f I:i v �Ty. 1 - [— - _,�jt�F•Y . ]3 226TH IL S ° zzaTH PE sw "..7.if f-f Tr— I m 22g sr smm I Ji '�.p, m CITY OF 1 f 3 UNINCORPORATED ^•� MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN OF ERDR I229T"PDgw ¢ a OLYMPIC VIEW SNOHOMISH 6T1ST3 s ,� I� WOOD.WAY .6°R WATER & SEWER DISTRICTI COUNTY 6-DI j 2313sTN m �ry 1L 23zN1 sr sW IANE DP 3 t,er� ,z•cI 3 .. ' 1 -__• -rH ST g•m a•DI 8-DI --- ¢ � 104 "IN"'All ' ..n• r j�'.z MAEKINA LANE 113T SW" 8.. im 6LI d•° �- I 21, ST SW � M1.236T 6rH ' f-,lT' L '••., - l j�_�_i _• ^ _ am ► - �Is6Taw z3r �z�• - 2.. •a•m m a.� Ah 8•DI m � r I' •1 `7- 5-2a�ifISTT�m/ .143 3 _ MCAEBt- Lake r ^ w p U ,z•a zzorHSTsw 'I z46 a•D see Ballinger _ - TH sr smW a•Dlm I^ m orye a°m o ~ •4 R sroI m ALD Close-up of CIP M1 m — — - Standby Supply from�`� 11 ,g� 2 1STIT Q Conversion of 325 Zone to 486 Zone Seattle Public Utilities •'•••••.2.1 °IT5'"''. 1 r •N • a,Dl.°� Cross -hatching indicates converted area m Close-up of Updated CIP 21 :z'.` 2 rs'n.' • r11 . (592 Zone) L u 144w , The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or impl� ied,��`=`r >E* s F4 f y 'y�•„MI 6'C• a" O SNOHOM/SH COUN as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information `�+' displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying KING COUNTY purposes. Notification of any errors is appreciated. SEATTLE PUBLIC ! NORTH CITY Source: City of Edmonds GyS, Washington State Dept. of Health and Snohomish County GIs (April 2017). UTILITIES I WATER DISTRI packet Pg. 261 7.1.a (D N N N C R a E a� U) L cu 0 i .N 0 0 L E 0 U ti r O N r C 0 E t V R r-+ r Q Packet Pg. 262 7.1.a CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Introduction The primary goal of the financial plan is to develop a multi -year rate strategy that generates enough revenue to cover the operating and capital costs associated with providing water utility service in the City of Edmonds. This analysis focuses on defining the amount of revenue needed to meet the system's financial obligations including: • Fiscal policies • Capital costs • Operation and maintenance costs • Existing/new debt service obligations • Administrative and overhead costs The financial analysis evaluates the affordability of the City's water rates, considering the impacts of completing the water utility capital improvement program (CIP). Past Financial Performance Table 10-1 summarizes the water utility's financial performance from 2010 — 2015, as documented in the City's financial statements (Statement of Net Position). It is worth noting that the City historically tracked its water, sewer, and stormwater utilities in a combined operating fund, making it relatively difficult to evaluate the water utility's financial performance alone. The City was able to provide utility accounting reports at a sub -account level of detail, which enabled the construction of a simple financial report mimicking an income statement for 2010 — 2012. Because the City changed its accounting practices in 2013 to track each utility's operating fund separately, Table 10-1 reflects the water utility's actual Statement of Net Position for 2013 — 2015. In addition to the income statement, this analysis tracks several financial metrics: • O&M Coverage Ratio: This ratio summarizes the ability of operating revenues to cover operating expenses, and is computed by dividing total operating revenues by total operating expenses (excluding depreciation, which is a non -cash expense). A ratio of 1.00 or greater suggests that revenues are adequate to cover operating expenses, with higher values indicating stronger financial performance. • Net Operating Income (as a Percent of Operating Revenue): This metric shows the ability of operating revenue to cover operating expenses. For consistency with the City's financial statements, this metric includes depreciation as an expense. • Debt Service Coverage Ratio: This ratio provides a basis for evaluating financial performance in the context of the amount of net revenue available for parity debt 15-1662 Page 10-1 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 263 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN service (on an annual basis). It is calculated by dividing net revenue (revenues less expenses before depreciation) by annual parity debt service. Table 10-1 Historical Financial Performance (2010 - 2015) ISummary of Water Utilitv Financial Performance 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operating Revenues Water Sales Revenue Hydrant Revenue Water Utility Tax Collections Other Charges for Services Other Operating Revenues Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Personnel Services Water Purchased for Resale Operations and Maintenance Professional Services Insurance Depreciation Total Operating Expenses $ 3,817,342 $ 4,273,829 $ 4,617,109 $ 5,054,764 $ 5,533,916 $ 6,089,810 141,789 107,888 68,616 145,523 188,170 92,523 713,748 798,993 863,132 944,824 1,034,551 1,138,481 - - - 2,469 1,174 3,254 91,590 120,034 122,748 136,207 136,359 67,406 $ 4,764,469 $ 5,300,744 $ 5,671,605 $ 6,283,787 $ 6,894,170 $ 7,391,475 $ 830,889 $ 977,471 $ 983,615 $ 1,069,045 $ 1,063,953 $ 1,060,442 1,242,227 1,347,968 1,448,400 1,499,289 1,492,894 1,514,798 1,728,127 1,808,633 1,930,633 2,107,257 2,730,461 2,593,293 432,034 41,210 45,810 51,285 144,861 133,864 81,729 84,512 70,440 67,607 74,688 70,904 486,844 487,135 516,900 614,518 736,330 856,511 $ 4,801,851 $ 4,746,929 $ 4,995,798 $ 5,409,001 $ 6,243,187 $ 6,229,812 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (37,382) $ 553,815 $ 675,807 $ 874,786 $ 650,983 $ 1,161,663 Non -Operating Revenues (Expenses) Intergovernmental $ 50,844 $ 237,884 $ 152,068 $ 161,294 $ 88,835 $ 58,129 Investment Earnings 4,944 3,280 17,464 8,855 19,582 38,557 Gain (Loss) on Sale of Capital Assets 3,002 - - - - (23,935) Interest Expense (74,809) (70,417) (281,376) (69,187) (29,339) (618,288) Total Non -Operating Revenues (Expenses) $ (16,020) $ 170,746 $ (111,844) $ 100,962 $ 79,078 $ (545,537) Income (Loss) Before Contributions and Transfers Capital Contributions Transfers Out Change In Accounting Principle - GASB 68 Change In Net Position Total Net Position - Beginning Prior Period Adjustments Adjusted Net Position - Beginning Change In Net Position Total Net Position - Ending $ (53,402) $ 724,561 $ 563,963 $ 975,748 $ 730,061 $ 616,126 38,668 37,879 79,781 97,382 331,499 269,222 962,375 77,134 245,800 - (833) (1,885) $ 947,641 $ 839,574 $ 889,544 $ 1,073,130 $ 1,060,727 $ 204,860 $11,494,126 $12,441,767 $13,281,340 $14,170,884 $15,244,014 $16,580,270 - - - - 275,529 (17,091) $11,494,126 $12,441,767 $13,281,340 $14,170,884 $15,519,543 $16,563,179 947,641 839,574 889,544 1,073,130 1,060,727 204,860 $12,441,767 $13,281,340 $14,170,884 $15,244,014 $16,580,270 $16,768,039 0&M Coverage Ratio 1.10 1.24 1.27 1.31 1.25 1.38 Net Operating Income as % of Operating Revenue -0.78% 11.67% 13.53% 16.17% 10.43% 18.65% Debt Service Coverage Ratio 3.15 7.72 3.24 3.17 2.10 Z33 Key findings from Table 10-1 include: • Total water sales revenue increased by 55.1% from 2010 - 2015, primarily due to the fact that the City increased its water rates by 47.6% during that period. 15-1662 Page10-2 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 264 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN • Total operating expenses (including depreciation) increased by 29.7% from 2010 — 2015. Excluding depreciation, the water utility's cash operating expenses increased by 24.5% over the past six years. • The O&M coverage ratio began at 1.10 in 2010, and has since varied from 1.24 — 1.38. This suggests that the water utility's operating revenues have been adequate to cover operating expenses (excluding depreciation) for the past six years. • Net operating income was slightly below zero in 2010, signifying that operating revenues were inadequate to fully cover operating expenses and depreciation. It has generally increased each year thereafter. • The debt service coverage ratio has consistently remained above 2.00, comfortably above the minimum of 1.25 required by the City's bond covenants. When the City issued revenue bonds in 2015, Moody's cited the utilities' healthy coverage ratio and stable operating history as grounds for a bond rating of "Aa3" (signifying that the City has "very strong" capacity to meet its financial commitments). Capital Funding Sources The City may fund the water CIP from a variety of sources, described in further detail below. Government Programs Federal and state grant programs were historically available to local utilities for capital funding assistance, but have largely been scaled back or replaced by loan programs due to budgetary constraints. Those that remain are generally lightly funded and heavily subscribed. Nevertheless, even low -interest loans present worthwhile opportunities for cost savings. Funding programs for which the City might be eligible include: Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) Grant and Loan Program A division of the Washington State Department of Commerce, CERB provides grants and loans for infrastructure improvements including utility projects (grants are available only when a loan is not reasonably possible). Eligible applicants include cities, towns, port districts, special-purpose districts, federally recognized Indian tribes, and other municipal corporations. This program prioritizes projects that create or retain jobs for low and moderate -income residents — because it is need -based and intended to be a "last -resort" relative to other funding sources, the City might not qualify for assistance. More information is available at http://www.commerce.wa.gov/building-infrastructure/community-economic- revitalization-board. 15-1662 Page10-3 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 265 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loan Program Administered by the Public Works Board, this program provides low -interest loans for local governments to finance public infrastructure construction and rehabilitation. Eligible projects must improve public health and safety, respond to environmental issues, promote economic development, or upgrade system performance. Relying on funding decisions made by the State Legislature, this program has been very limited in recent years due to competing legislative priorities. The next funding cycle begins in the summer of 2017. Information regarding the application process as well as rates and terms are posted on the PWTF website in early spring. Further detail is available at http://www.pwb.wa.gov. Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Loan Program DWSRF funding historically targets protection of public health, compliance with drinking water regulations, and assistance for small and disadvantaged communities. Applicants need an approved water system plan (or plan amendment) containing the DWSRF project prior to submitting an application. All public water systems that receive a DWSRF loan must undergo an environmental review, a cultural review, and an Investment -Grade Efficiency Audit (IGEA). The IGEA is an effort to apply energy efficiency to water systems and may be financed as part of the DWSRF loan. The 2017 application cycle will begin on October 2nd and conclude on November 30th. Further detail is available at http://www.doh.wa.gov. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program The CDBG program assists with final design and construction of water, sewer, stormwater, and other projects serving economic development. These projects must principally benefit low to moderate -income people in non -entitlement cities and counties. Cities or towns must have a population fewer than 50,000 people and counties must have a population fewer than 200,000 people. Applications for the 2017 program are due in June of 2017. More information can be found at www.commerce.wa. og v/cdbg. Public Debt There are two major types of public debt that utilities use to finance capital investment: General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds G.O. bonds are secured by the full faith and credit of the issuing agency, committing all available tax and revenue resources to debt repayment. With this high level of commitment, G.O. bonds have relatively low interest rates. However, the Washington Constitution and statutes limit the amount and use of G.O. bond funds in relation to assessed valuation. RCW 39.36.020 states that: "(ii) Counties, cities, and towns are limited to an indebtedness amount not exceeding one and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property in such counties, cities, 15-1662 Page 10-4 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 266 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN or towns without the assent of three -fifths of the voters therein voting at an election held for that purpose. (b) In cases requiring such assent counties, cities, towns, and public hospital districts are limited to a total indebtedness of two and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property therein." While bonding capacity can limit availability of G.O. bonds for utility purposes, they can play a useful role in project financing if available. These bonds can benefit ratepayers through lower interest rates and other related cost savings, but also spread the repayment obligation to all tax -paying properties (not just developed properties) through the authorization of an ad valorem property tax levy. Revenue Bonds Commonly used to fund utility capital improvements, revenue bonds are secured solely by utility revenues. Revenue bonds do not require a commitment of the issuing agency's other revenue sources (e.g., taxes) for debt repayment, and as a result they typically bear higher interest rates than G.O. bonds. They also generally come with additional requirements to protect bondholders from default risk, including the maintenance of a dedicated bond reserve and minimum standards of financial performance (debt service coverage). Revenue bonds can be issued in Washington without a public vote. There is no bonding limit, except perhaps the practical limit of the utility's ability to generate sufficient revenue to repay the debt and meet required coverage ratios. Utility Resources The City's Water Utility Fund (Fund 421) consists of an accumulation of cash resources that the City can use for capital project funding. In addition to existing cash balances, the City can use utility revenues to either fund projects directly or repay debt issued to fund the projects. With respect to capital funding, rate revenue is most appropriate for moderate, ongoing investments such as annual replacement programs. For larger projects, the City would need to generate cash funding in advance (or issue debt if that is not possible). General Facilities Charges Under the authority of RCW 35.92.025, the City imposes general facilities charges (GFCs) on development as a condition of service. In addition to any other costs related to physically connecting a customer to the system, the GFC is typically based on a blend of historical and planned future capital investment in system infrastructure — its underlying premise is that growth (future customers) will pay for an equitable share of the costs that the utility has incurred (or will incur) to provide capacity to serve new customers. While the RCW does not explicitly define a methodology for calculating GFCs, the GFC is generally calculated by dividing an allocable "cost of the system" by the applicable customer 15-1662 Page 10-5 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 267 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN base served by the system to arrive at a cost per unit of capacity. The ensuing sections discuss the various aspects of the GFC calculation in further detail. Existing Cost Basis The GFC cost basis includes costs associated with existing assets to recognize that those assets will provide benefit to new customers. In addition to this documented cost of existing assets, RCW 35.92.025 allows the City to recover a provision for interest accrued on assets. Conceptually, this interest provision (which is limited to ten years of interest accrual on each asset) attempts to account for opportunity costs that the City's customers incurred by supporting investments in infrastructure rather than having the money available for investment or other uses. This cost basis is adjusted to reflect: • Construction Work In Progress: The City has substantial investments in capital projects that are currently underway — these projects are not completed or booked as assets, but do represent an investment made by the City in the system. Consequently, the cost of construction work in progress is added to the GFC cost basis. • Contributed Assets: Assets funded by developer extensions are excluded from the cost basis on the premise that the GFC should only recover costs actually incurred by the City. Net Outstanding Debt Principal: When a new customer connects to the City's system and becomes a ratepayer, they will pay for a proportionate share of the annual debt service payments associated with the City's outstanding debt. To recognize this and avoid double charging customers for assets through GFCs and rates, the cost basis reflects a deduction for outstanding debt principal net of available cash balances. • Provision for Asset Retirement: The City recognizes that many of the capital expenditures in the future cost basis are planned as repair and replacement projects for existing infrastructure. An adjustment is made to the existing cost basis for assets that will be replaced by the capital projects proposed to avoid double charging for both existing assets and their replacement. Future Cost Basis The GFC cost basis also includes costs associated with future water CIP projects to recognize that (a) certain projects are needed to expand capacity for growth, and (b) other projects involve replacing existing assets at a higher cost than the City's original investment in those assets. The capital costs included in the future cost basis are generally based on the capital program developed in this Plan, though inflation is backed out of the cost estimates. The future cost basis excludes projects funded by grants or developer extensions, as well as project cost reimbursements from the City's other utilities (which represent investments by those utilities that would most equitably be recovered through their respective GFCs). 15-1662 Page10-6 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 268 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Customer Base Given that the City's customers can impose significantly different demands on the water system, the GFC calculation uses the concept of meter equivalents (MEs) to standardize the customer base. One ME represents the maximum continuous flow capacity of a defined "standard" meter (most often a 3/4" meter) — this analysis uses maximum continuous flow ratios published by the American Water Works Association (AWWA) to assign MEs to larger meters. The customer base is separated into two groups: existing customers and future growth. The existing customer base of 13,819 MEs is based on 2016 customer statistics provided by the City, excluding fire and sprinkler meters. The future customer base reflects the application of an annual growth rate of 0.50% to the existing ME count, resulting in a projected future customer base of 15,192 MEs by 2035. GFC Calculation The GFC calculation is based on an "average cost" methodology, which computes a charge per ME by dividing the allocable cost by the applicable number of MEs. Table 10-2 summarizes the updated GFC calculation. Table 10-2 General Facility Charge Calculation Usting Cost Basis Total PLANT -IN-SERVICE Utility Capital Assets as of 12/31/16 $ 37,415,792 less: Contributed Capital (1,097,505) plus: Intereston Non -Contributed Plant 12,267,235 less: Estimated Cost of Water Mains to be Replaced (1,320,547) less: Estimated Interest on Water Mains to be Replaced (832,403) plus: 2016 Construction -Work -in -Progress 346,578 less: Net Debt Principal Outstanding 7,527,487 TOTAL EXISTING COST BASIS $ 39,251,665 Future Cost Basis $ 57,425,247 Customer Base (excluding Fire & Sprinkler Meters) MEs Existing Equivalent Residential Units (Meter Equivalents) 13,819 Future Equivalent Residential Units (Incremental) 1,374 TOTAL CUSTOMER BASE 15,192 Resulting Charge Total Cost Basis $ 96,676,912 Total Customer Base 15,192 TOTAL GFC PER METER EQUIVALENT $ 6,364 Dividing the total cost basis of $96,676,912 by the projected 2035 customer base of 15,192 MEs generates a GFC of $6,364 per ME. This represents an increase of $1,314 over the City's current charge of $5,050 per ME. Since the calculated charges represent the 15-1662 Page 10-7 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 269 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN maximum allowable charge, the City may choose to implement a charge at any level up to the calculated charge. Revenues generated from the charge will vary depending on whether or not the full increase shown in Table 10-2 is implemented upfront or phased in over time. Delaying or otherwise limiting GFC increases will generally reduce the amount of revenue available for capital funding. GFC revenues were conservatively estimated at current charge levels for the following financial plan. Financial Plan The City of Edmonds' water utility operates as an enterprise fund, and is generally responsible to fully fund all of its needs without reliance on tax revenues or other General Fund resources. The primary source of funding for the utility is revenue from water service charges, which the City sets by ordinance and can adjust as needed to meet its objectives. The financial plan evaluates the City's ability to fund the water utility's CIP and other financial needs while maintaining affordable water rates. It is a comprehensive analysis that includes both operating and capital elements: • The revenue requirement analysis determines the amount of revenue necessary to fund the ongoing operation, maintenance, and administration of the utility on an annual basis, focusing specifically on the needs funded from operating revenues. It includes a framework of fiscal policies intended to promote long-term financial stability and viability. • The capital funding plan develops a funding strategy for the 2016 — 2022 CIP that considers rate revenues, existing reserves, GFCs, debt financing, and any other anticipated resources (e.g., grants, developer contributions, etc.). It can impact the revenue requirement analysis through use of debt financing (resulting in annual debt service) and capital funding embedded in rates. Financial Policies The ensuing discussion summarizes the key financial policies used in the revenue requirement analysis. Utility Reserves Reserves are a key component of any utility financial strategy, as they provide the flexibility to manage variations in costs and revenues that could otherwise have an adverse impact on ratepayers. For the purpose of rate and financial planning, resources are separated into the following funds: • Operating Fund: This fund provides an unrestricted fund balance to accommodate the short-term cycles of revenues and expenses. These reserves are intended to address variations in revenues and expenses, whether anticipated (e.g., billing/receipt cycles, 15-1662 Page 10-8 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 270 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN payroll cycles) or unanticipated (e.g., weather, economic conditions). Consistent with industry standards, the water utility maintains a balance equal to 45 — 60 days of operating expenses in this fund. Based on the City's 2016 Budget, this target range is approximately $488,000 — $651,000. 0 Capital Fund: This fund provides a source of cash for unanticipated capital expenditures such as emergency asset replacements or capital project overruns. In the context of the financial analysis, it also enforces an appropriate segregation of resources restricted (or otherwise designated) for capital purposes. Recognizing that the City can defer projects and/or issue debt in response to unanticipated capital costs, this fund does not have an explicit minimum balance target. • Bond Reserve: The City's bond covenants require that the City maintains a bond reserve based on the least of (1) maximum annual parity debt service, (2) 125% of average annual parity debt service, and (3) 10% of the original proceeds of the outstanding parity bonds. Based on the water utility's share of outstanding revenue bonds, its share of the bond reserve requirement is approximately $1.2 million. System Reinvestment The water system's infrastructure assets lose value over time due to routine wear and tear, representing a future replacement liability. The concept of system reinvestment funding entails funding this future replacement liability through a regular and predictable rate provision. Benchmarks for annual system reinvestment funding are often linked to depreciation expense as a readily available measure of the decline in asset value over time, but annual funding levels can also be set by policy. Given the City's preference to fund future capital needs on a "pay-as-you-go" (cash) basis, the financial plan assumes annual system reinvestment funding of $1.8 — $2.9 million during the study period. It is important to note that this policy does not guarantee full cash funding for all future capital needs, but it intends to provide the City with the financial flexibility to issue debt at its discretion. Financial Performance Standards The revenue requirement analysis uses a pair of sufficiency tests to establish the amount of revenue needed to meet the utility's financial obligations on an annual basis. • Cash Flow Test: To satisfy this test, the utility's operating revenues must be adequate to fund all known cash requirements including O&M expenses, debt service payments, system reinvestment funding (and other rate -funded capital outlays), and reserve funding. 0 Coverage Test: Intended to ensure compliance with the City's bond covenants, satisfying this test requires that net revenue is greater than or equal to 1.25 times annual parity debt service. The annual revenue requirement is broadly defined as the amount of revenue needed to satisfy both of these tests. Short-term cash flow deficits may occur as part of a strategy to 15-1662 Page 10-9 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 271 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN phase rate increases in, as long as the utility has sufficient reserves on hand to absorb them. The financial plan assumes that the debt service coverage requirement must always be met. Capital Funding Plan The CIP developed for this plan totals $18.9 million ($21.5 million inflated) over the 2017- 2022 planning horizon. Costs are stated in 2016 dollars and escalated to the year of planned spending for financing projections at an annual inflation rate of 4%. Table 10-3 summarizes the annual CIP expenditures in 2016 and inflated dollars. Table 10-3 Water Utility Capital Improvement Program Water CI P S umma Year 2016 $ 1 nflated $ 2017 $ 3,865,990 $ 4,020,630 2018 $ 3,941,541 $ 4,263,171 2019 $ 2,248,489 $ 2,529,244 2020 $ 2,960,577 $ 3,463,456 2021 $ 2,960,577 $ 3,601,994 2022 $ 2,960,577 $ 3,746,073 2017-2022 Total $18,937,750 $ 21,624,568 2023 - 2035 $ 38,487,497 $ 43,534,263 2017-2035 Total $ 57,425,247 $ 65,158,830 A capital funding plan is developed to determine the total resources available to meet the CIP needs and determine if new debt financing will be required. The water utility began 2017 with approximately $10.1 million — netting out $1.2 million restricted for debt service and $651,000 set aside for the Operating Fund leaves approximately $8.3 million available for capital investment. GFC revenue collections are estimated to contribute, on average, $340,000 per year from 2017 to 2022. All capital expenditures are expected to be funded directly through cash resources without any reliance on debt. The capital funding plan is summarized in Table 10-4 below. Table 10-4 2016-2022 Annual Capital Fund Cash Flow Capital Financing Plan 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beginning Balance $ 8,292,398 $ 6,799,043 $ 5,313,446 $ 6,058,853 $ 5,945,095 $ 5,807,492 plus: Interest Earnings 20,731 33,995 39,851 45,441 44,588 43,556 plus: Interfund Transfers from Funds 422/423 200,000 - - - - - plus: General Facilities Charges 340,955 342,660 344,373 346,095 347,826 349,565 plus: Capital Funding from Rates 1,965,589 2,400,918 2,890,427 2,958,162 3,071,977 3,206,173 less: Capital Expenditures (4,020,630) (4,263,171) (2,529,244) (3,463,456) (3,601,994) (3,746,073) Ending Balance $ 6,799,043 $ 5,313,446 $ 6,058,853 $ 5,945,095 $ 5,807,492 $ 5,660,713 15-1662 Page 10-10 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 272 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN The CIP costs shown in the table are inflated to the year of spending. Table 10-4 shows $16.5 million in capital funding from rates from 2017 — 2022 (through a combination of system reinvestment and Operating Fund transfers), which represents approximately 67.0% of the projected capital costs. The remainder is expected to be funded through a combination of existing cash balances, interest earnings, and GFC revenues. Revenue Requirement The revenue requirement analysis enables the City to set utility rate structures which fully recover the total cost of operating the system. Capital improvement and replacement, operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses, general administration, fiscal policy attainment, cash reserve management, and debt repayment all come together to form the basis for the revenue requirement. The revenue needed to satisfy all the utility financial obligations is then compared to the revenue derived from the current level of rates to determine sufficiency. Projected Financial Performance The revenue requirement analysis is based on the following assumptions: • The 2016 budget forms the baseline for the forecast of revenues and expenses. • Rate revenues under existing rates are forecast to increase with customer growth, which is projected to be approximately 0.5% per year. • Most operating expenses are escalated annually at 3.0% for general cost inflation. Employee benefit costs are escalated at 10.0% per year to recognize recent and expected increases in those costs. • Per City staff s direction, Alderwood Water and Wastewater District water rates are assumed to increase annually per the following schedule: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 5.5% 5.6% 3.9% 4.2% 9.9% 3.1% 5.3% 0 GFC revenues are assumed at an average annual amount of $340,000 per year throughout the study period. 0 The City's annual fund interest earnings rate is assumed to be 0.25% in 2016 and 2017, 0.50% in 2018 and increasing to 0.75% thereafter. Table 10-5 summarizes the projected financial performance and rate revenue requirements of the water utility for 2016 through 2022 based upon the above assumptions. 15-1662 Page10-11 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 273 7.1.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Table 10-5 Summary of Projected Financial Performance & Revenue Requirements Revenue Requirements 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Revenue Rate Revenues at 2016 Rates $ 6,755,358 $ 6,792,000 $ 6,828,911 $ 6,866,095 $ 6,903,556 $ 6,808,446 $ 6,842,488 Non -Rate Revenues 124,950 109,579 114,349 119,236 119,441 119,786 119,987 Total Revenue $ 6,880,308 $ 6,901,579 $ 6,943,260 $ 6,985,331 $ 7,022,997 $ 6,928,232 $ 6,962,475 Expenses Cash Operating Expenses $3,959,820 $4,131,337 $4,283,873 $ 4,450,177 $ 4,730,105 $ 4,893,233 $ 5,119,811 Debt Service 1,248,072 1,252,624 1,254,168 1,256,540 1,258,950 1,254,358 1,254,742 System Reinvestment - 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,300,000 2,500,000 2,700,000 2,900,000 Total Expenses $ 5,207,892 $ 7,183,961 $ 7,538,041 $ 8,006,717 $ 8,489,054 $ 8,847,591 $ 9,274,553 Net Cash Flow $1,672,416 $ (282,383) $ (594,782) $ (1,021,386) $ (1,466,057) $ (1,919,359) $ (2,312,078) Annual Rate Adjustment 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% After Rate Increases: Rate Revenues $6,755,358 $7,403,280 $8,113,429 $ 8,891,792 $ 9,297,918 $ 9,536,613 $ 9,967,668 Net Cash Flow $1,672,416 $ 193,784 $ 425,992 $ 617,764 $ 504,178 $ 398,792 $ 343,419 Debt Service Coverage 2.40 2.67 3.03 3.44 3.51 3.59 3.71 As shown in Table 10-5, projected revenues under the existing (2016) rates are insufficient to fund projected rate needs, primarily due to the level of rate -funded system reinvestment needed to fund the capital improvement program. The proposed rate strategy envisions 9.0% annual rate increases from 2017 — 2019 and 4.0% annual increases thereafter. It is important to note that these projections are based upon current assumptions and the capital program identified herein. Circumstances might change over time, causing actual rate adjustments to be higher or lower once actual costs are known. It would be prudent for the City to monitor the water utility's financial status regularly, revisiting the analysis in the event of any significant changes. Current and Projected Rates Existing Rates The City's existing water rate structure has two components; a bimonthly base charge and a uniform volume charge. Residential and multi -family customers pay the base charge on each dwelling unit, while other customers' base charges vary by meter size. All customers pay the same volume rate per hundred cubic feet (ccf) of water consumption. The City's current rate structure is presented in Table 10-6. In order to enhance conservation signals to water customers, the City might consider transitioning to an increasing block rate structure for single-family residential customers, and differentiate volume rates among the customer classes. Other potential options for enhancing 15-1662 Page 10-12 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 274 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN conservation signals would be designating irrigation customers (if there are any) as a separate customer class, and considering implementing seasonal rates for customer classes with seasonal usage patterns. It should be noted that such changes in the rate structure require a more comprehensive and detailed rate and cost of service analyses, which the City may consider in the future. Projected Rates Table 10-6 presents the City's water rate schedule, incorporating the rate adjustments shown in Table 10-5. It reflects an across-the-board application of the recommended rate adjustments. The City Council adopted the 2017 - 2019 rate increases; the 2020 - 2022 rates are shown for planning purposes only. The City plans to revisit the water rate analysis prior to adjusting rates in 2020. Table 10-6 Water Rate Forecast Water Rate Schedule 2016 Adopted 2017 2018 2019 2020 Projected 2021 2022 Annual Rate Increase 0.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% Bimonthly Base Rates Residential (per Unit) Single -Family $28.68 $31.26 $34.07 $37.14 $38.63 $40.17 $41.78 Multi -Family $25.26 $27.53 $30.01 $32.71 $34.02 $35.38 $36.79 All Other Customers: 3/4" Meter $34.68 $37.80 $41.20 $44.91 $46.71 $48.57 $50.52 1" Meter $70.60 $76.95 $83.88 $91.43 $95.09 $98.89 $102.85 1-1/2" Meter $130.55 $142.30 $155.11 $169.07 $175.83 $182.87 $190.18 2" Meter $199.04 $216.95 $236.48 $257.76 $268.07 $278.79 $289.94 3" Meter $429.38 $468.02 $510.15 $556.06 $578.30 $601.43 $625.49 4" Meter $608.22 $662.96 $722.63 $787.66 $819.17 $851.93 $886.01 6" Meter $1,233.55 $1,344.57 $1,465.58 $1,597.48 $1,661.38 $1,727.83 $1,796.95 Variable Rates All Customers (per ccf) $2.99 $3.26 $3.55 $3.87 $4.02 $4.19 $4.35 Attordanility The Washington State Department of Health and the State Public Works Board have historically used an affordability index to prioritize low-cost loan awards. The typical threshold looks at whether a system's rates exceed 1.5% to 2.0% of the median household income for the demographic area. As a result, if monthly bills are less than 1.5% of the median household income for the demographic area, they are generally considered affordable. The median household income for the City of Edmonds in the 2015 census was $75,044. The 2015 census figure was escalated to 2016 using the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau 15-1662 Page 10-13 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 275 7.1.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculator. Future years are escalated at 3.0% per year. Table 10-7 presents the City's rates with the projected rate increases annually for the forecast period (using single-family residential rates and assuming 8 ccf of water usage bimonthly water consumption assumption), tested against the 2% threshold. Table 10-7 Affordability Test Affordability Analysis 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Bimonthly Single -Family Bill @ 16 ccf(1) $90.83 $97.66 $104.96 $112.98 $116.09 $117.86 $122.57 Median Household Income (2) $75,991 $78,270 $80,619 $83,037 $85,528 $88,094 $90,737 Annual Single -Family Bill as %of MHI 0.72% 0.75% 0.78% 0.82% 0.81% 0.80% 0.81% (1) City Utility Tax Rate 18.70% 17.07% 15.50% 14.05% 12.68% 10.00% 10.00% (2) Median Income Data: US Census Bureau, 2015 ACS 5-year estimate adjusted by 3.0% per year Table 10-7 indicates that the City's rates are forecasted to remain well within the stated affordability threshold (2.0% of median household income) throughout the projection period. Note that the forecast of customer bills reflects a planned reduction in the City's utility tax rate from 18.7% to 10.0% over a five-year period. Conclusion The revenue requirement analysis indicates that the City needs to increase its water rates to fund the water utility's financial obligations, particularly capital investment. The rate strategy increases rates by 9.0% per year from 2017 — 2019, followed by recommended 4.0% annual increases from 2020 — 2022. Even with these increases, the City's water rates are expected to remain "affordable" as defined by industry standards. It is recommended that the City regularly monitor the financial position of the water utility, revisiting the key underlying assumptions to ensure that the utility's revenues remain adequate to meet its financial obligations. 15-1662 Page10-14 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 276 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX A Packet Pg. 277 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 278 7.1.a ORIGIN WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Between Alderwood Water & Wastewater District and City of Edmonds Table of Contents SECTION I. - WATER SUPPLY........................................................................................... 2 SECTION II. - DEFINITIONS.............................................................................................. 3 SECTION III. - FUTURE FACILITY ACQUISITIONS.................................................. 5 SECTION IV. - CONTINUITY OF SERVICE.................................................................... 7 SECTION V. - OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY................................................................. 8 SECTION VI. - WHOLESALE COMMITTEE.................................................................. 9 SECTION VII. - MASTER METER................................................................................... 10 SECTION VIII. - AREA OF USE........................................................................................ 11 SECTION IX. - WATER QUALITY................................................................................... 11 SECTION X. - SUPPLY TO DISTRICT -OWNED SERVICES TRANSMITTED THROUGH CUSTOMER MAINS............................................................ 11 SECTION XI. - WHOLESALE WATER RATE............................................................... 12 SECTION XII. - BILLING & PAYMENT......................................................................... 16 SECTION XIII. - TERM & EXPIRATION....................................................................... 16 SECTION XIV. - NOTICE OF NEGOTIATION............................................................. 17 SECTION XV. - FORCE MAJEURE AND CHANGES IN LAW .................................. 17 SECTION XVI. - LEGAL RELATIONS............................................................................ 17 SECTION XVII. - DISPUTE RESOLUTION................................................................... 18 SECTION XVIII. - GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE .................................................. 19 SECTION IXX. - NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES .............................................. 19 SECTION XX. - LIMITATION ON DAMAGES .............................................................. 19 SECTION XXI. - GENERAL PROVISIONS.................................................................... 19 EXHIBIT A — QUANTITY OF WATER TO BE PURCHASED ................................... 23 EXHIBIT B - WHOLESALE FACILITIES..................................................................... 24 EXHIBIT C - REGIONAL FACILITIES......................................................................... 25 EXHIBIT D — CUSTOMERS WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT TO OTHER SUPPLIERS................................................................................................ 26 EXHIBIT E — MASTER METER LOCATION............................................................... 27 M-'ID its WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT --�t-7 Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 1 Packet Pg. 279 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS FOR WATER SUPPLY This Wholesale Water Supply Agreement ("Agreement") between the ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT, a special purpose municipal corporation (the "District,") and CITY OF EDMONDS (the "Customer") (individually a "Parry" and collectively the "Parties") for the purposes set forth herein. WHEREAS, the District and the Customer are each authorized under the law of the State of Washington to supply potable water to their retail customers and to enter into wholesale contracts for the purchase and sale of wholesale water supply; and WHEREAS, the District and the Customer desire to enter into an agreement wherein the District sells wholesale water to the Customer at a wholesale water rate that will adequately compensate the District for those current and future costs attributable to supplying wholesale water to the Customer; NOW, THEREFORE, The District and the Customer agree as follows: SECTION I. - WATER SUPPLY The District agrees to sell to the Customer and the Customer agrees to purchase from the District up to the daily quantity of water shown in Exhibit "A" according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The water shall be delivered to a Master Meter at a point in or immediately adjacent to a site as depicted on Exhibit B and E. The District shall be the Customer's primary source of water; provided that the Customer may use any existing alternate source connections and re -use water as sources of water supply. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 280 7.1.a 32 SECTION II. - DEFINITIONS 33 34 As used in this Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the 35 following words and phrases shall mean: a 36 "Administrative Time" means the District's administrative costs incurred to E a� 37 maintain, operate and repair the Wholesale Facilities. Cn 38 Cubic Foot" means a unit of measurement of water equal to 7.48 gallons. The term "CCF" r 39 shall mean 100 cubic feet of water. a 40 "Distribution Main means any water main owned and operated by either the District or by the o U 41 Customer as part of its Retail Water System. CN 42 "District Peak Day Water" means the 24-hour maximum usage day measured in million 43 gallons pumped from the Everett System through the three pump stations operated by the o 44 District. c L 45 "Everett Supply Contract" means the current agreement between the City of Everett and the 46 District for water supply, dated January 28, 2005, and any future amendments thereof. 47 Master Meter" means the measuring device installed to measure the volume of water a 48 supplied to the Customer by the District. N N_ 49 "Peak Day Water" means the 24-hour maximum usage day measured in million gallons c 50 during a calendar year. 51 "Regional Facilities" means District assets as identified on Exhibit C that are necessary to 52 provide service to all District retail and wholesale customers. 53 "Retail Water System means that system owned and operated by the District or by the 54 Customer composed of Distribution Mains and appurtenances used for receiving a supply of 55 water and distributing it directly to the District's or the Customer's retail customers. 56 "Service Connections means those separate connections between a Retail Water System 57 and a retail customer. 58 Service Meters means the meter or measuring device installed on a service line or Service 59 Connection for the purpose of measuring the volume of water supplied to a retail customer. 60 "Terminal Storage Reservoir" means a storage reservoir used primarily to provide 61 reserves against transmission failure from the supply, supply or pumping failure, pump control 62 storage to balance and economically operate the supply pumps and which permits a reduced 63 sizing in the supply transmission and pumping system to the terminal storage reservoirs. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 3 Packet Pg. 281 7.1.a 64 Transmission Main means a pipe owned and operated by the District primarily used for 65 carrying water from a source (currently the Everett Water System) to a Retail Water System that 66 normally has limited or no Service Connections. 67 "Wholesale Customer" means a customer who purchases water from the District 68 according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement or an agreement with substantially 69 similar terms and conditions, delivered through the Wholesale Facilities. 70 "Wholesale Facilities" means current assets, identified on Exhibit B, and future assets 71 hereafter added to an amended Exhibit B, owned and operated by the District that are necessary 72 to supply water to the Wholesale Customers in this Agreement. These Wholesale Facilities may 73 also be part of the Regional Facilities. 74 "Wholesale Water Cost" means all of the costs incurred by the District to supply water to 75 Wholesale Customers, including 76 (1) The cost of purchased water, which is the annual amount (U.S dollars) paid by the 77 District for water supplied to the Wholesale Customers under either the Everett 78 Supply Contract or any other agreement for the purchase of water to supply the 79 Wholesale Customers. 80 (2) Maintenance and operation costs ("Wholesale M&O costs"), which are costs 81 incurred by the District to maintain, operate and repair the Wholesale Facilities, 82 including Administrative Time, cost of materials and supplies, and the full cost of 83 labor attributable to serving the Wholesale Customers. 84 (3) "Power Costs," which are the electrical and other fuel charges associated with 85 operating the Wholesale Facilities. 86 (4) "Existing Wholesale Debt, (Principal + Interest) which is the existing bonded 87 debt service and debt obligations of the District attributable to serving the 88 Wholesale Customers, including principal and interest payments. 89 (5) "Future Wholesale Debt Service," (Principal + Interest), which is future debt 90 issued by the District to finance capital improvements and infrastructure, 91 attributable to serving the Wholesale Customers, including principal and interest 92 payments. 93 (6) "Cash (Rate) Funded Wholesale Facility Improvements," ("CFI") which is that 94 revenue component of the Wholesale Water Rate used, in whole or in part, to cash WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 4 Packet Pg. 282 7.1.a 95 fund Wholesale Facilities. 96 (7) "Other Program Funding," which includes costs incurred by the District that 97 benefit Wholesale Customers but are not otherwise included in the Wholesale 98 Water Rate. 99 (8) "Quantity of Water Supplied," which is the prior year's total of water supplied to 100 the Wholesale Customers (CCF) as measured by all Master Meters, plus or minus 101 any adjustments for individual services of the Customer or District connected 102 upstream or downstream, respectively, of the Master Meters. 103 (9) "District Finance Option," which is a revenue component of the Wholesale Water 104 Rate used in whole or in part to fund capital improvements where bonds or CFI 105 are impractical or are not available. 106 "Wholesale Water Rate" means the cost of water to the Wholesale Customer in dollars 107 per hundred cubic feet (CCF). 108 "Wholesale Water System" includes the Wholesale Facilities and the Retail Water 109 System of any Wholesale Customer and of the District. 110 III SECTION III. - FUTURE FACILITY ACQUISITIONS 112 113 The Customer and the District agree that at such times in the future that the Customer 114 extends its corporate boundaries to include parts of the District's service area, the Parties will 115 benefit from having a process in place to determine what will become the property of the 116 Customer and what will remain the property of the District. Recognizing that Chapter 35.13A 117 RCW is the governing basis for such a process, the fact that the District provides service to seven 118 cities and the county's unincorporated area adds complexity to the process which requires more 119 process detail to insure that both the Customer and the District can fulfill their respective 120 obligations for service. Therefore, the following process shall define the requirements and 121 responsibilities of each party. 122 The Parties agree that the facilities and infrastructure that are necessary for supporting the 123 District's regional customers ("Regional Facilities") are identified herein. In areas proposed for 124 annexation, where the potential exists for the transfer of ownership of any portion of the 125 Regional Facilities, it is agreed that the Regional Facilities shall remain in the ownership and WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 5 Packet Pg. 283 7.1.a 126 control of the District. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to waive any right or obligation under 127 Washington law as the same exists or shall hereinafter be created. 128 If the Customer initiates the process to consider annexation of additional areas that are 129 located within the District, the Customer will notify the District in writing of its intent. After 130 receiving Customer's notice of intent to annex, representatives of the Customer and the District 131 shall meet at a mutually agreeable time and place to review the proposed annexation area with 132 regard to its potential impact on water and sewer service. Discussions between the Customer and 133 the District shall include a preliminary assessment of service continuing with the District and/or 134 the potential of facility transfer to the Customer. The preliminary assessment should include a 135 review of the extent of modifications that would be required to transfer the utilities to the 136 Customer, including the possibility for relocation of master meters and realignment of existing 137 distribution utilities. 138 Within 30 days following the initial meetings and completion of the preliminary 139 assessment of utility options, the Customer agrees to notify the District in writing of its intent 140 regarding which Party should be the service provider to the proposed annexation area. 141 If the Customer provides notice of its intent to further consider Customer ownership of 142 certain utilities owned by the District within the proposed annexation area, the Customer and the 143 District may agree to participate in a more detailed study in order to determine the extent of 144 facility modifications and costs impacts associated with the transfer of the utilities in the annexed 145 areas. The cost of any such study shall be split equally between the Parties. 146 After the Parties' review and analysis of the additional data provided by the detailed 147 study, if the Customer notifies the District in writing of its decision to assume ownership of the 148 utilities, a plan will be developed jointly for defining the steps necessary to complete the transfer 149 of ownership. The plan will include design and specifications for any required infrastructure 150 improvements, transfer of accounts, and final agreements on costs involved including costs 151 related to outstanding bond indebtedness. The costs associated with the preparation of this plan 152 shall be split equally between the Parties. 153 Once the plan (including the allocation of construction costs between the Parties) has 154 been agreed to by the Customer and the District, the District will prepare the final contract plans 155 and specifications for the required improvements, and will administer the contract for the 156 construction. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 6 Packet Pg. 284 7.1.a 157 158 159 Upon completion of the required improvements and payment to the District of agreed costs associated with the assumption of the utilities, including all associated construction costs, the District will transfer accounts, assign any existing easements, and provide the necessary bills 160 of sale for the transferred utilities. 161 The parties agree that the contract may be reopened if the assumption will affect rates. If 162 the process leads to facility assumption, the parties agree that the District would be provided 163 three (3) years to make the changes necessary to allow for transitional impact adjustments by the 164 District. 165 In the event the Parties are not able to agree on the plan, the amounts to be paid by the 166 Customer for the transfer of facilities, or any other disputes relating to the Customer's 167 acquisition of the District's facilities, the matter shall be referred to mediation for resolution in 168 accordance with Section XVII (Dispute Resolution). If the matter is not resolved through 169 mediation, the Parties shall proceed in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures set 170 forth in Section XVII. 171 172 SECTION IV. - CONTINUITY OF SERVICE 173 174 Except as otherwise provided, the District's supply of water to the Customer shall be 175 continuous. In the event of a general emergency or water shortage affecting the District, the 176 District and the Customer shall implement necessary water conservation measures. Because 177 the District and the Customer have critical customers, the District shall consult with the 178 Customer regarding water allocations. General restrictions placed upon deliveries to the 179 Customer shall be made according to the District's most recent Emergency/Drought 180 Response Plan. In the event of localized emergency problems, temporary service 181 interruptions may result. 182 The District may have to implement emergency Wholesale Water System 183 conservation measures to meet an emergency condition. The Customer shall assist and 184 support such emergency conservation measures. 185 If the District determines that interruptions and reductions are necessary or reasonable in 186 case of system emergencies, the District shall provide oral notice to the Customer and may 187 temporarily interrupt or reduce deliveries of water to the Customer. Except in cases of WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 7 Packet Pg. 285 7.1.a 188 emergency, and to avoid unreasonable interference with the Customer's operations, the District 189 shall give the Customer at least fourteen (14) calendar days notice of any proposed interruptions 190 or reduction in service, the reason therefore, and the probable duration thereof, including any 191 interruptions or reduction in services that will be caused by the installation of equipment, repairs, 192 replacements, investigations, inspections or other maintenance performed by the District on its 193 water system or those parts of the system supplying the Customer. 194 The City of Everett currently holds water rights regulated by the State Department 195 of Ecology and an approved Water System Plan regulated by the State Department of 196 Health that enables the City of Everett to perform the Everett Supply Contract. Said water 197 rights and plan currently authorize the District to supply City of Everett water to Customer 198 under this Agreement and consistent with the terms of the Everett Supply Contract. 199 Customer acknowledges and agrees that any interruption or restriction of said authorization 200 could result in the curtailment, interruption or reduction in the District's service to 201 Customer, the declaration of an emergency, or other measures reasonable under the 202 circumstances. 203 In the event of any of the foregoing or otherwise, the District shall have no 204 obligation whatsoever to obtain and furnish a substitute supply of water and Customer may 205 obtain and use any alternate lawful source of water supply including re -use water as 206 substitute water supply. The District shall cooperate with the Customer and use its best 207 efforts to assist Customer in obtaining an alternative source(s) of water supply. Nothing 208 herein shall be interpreted to waive any right or obligation under Washington law as the 209 same exists or shall hereinafter be created. 210 211 SECTION V. - OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY 212 213 The Everett Supply Contract includes a rate component of peak to average day flow 214 that affects the District and the Customer. Therefore, as a material element of this 215 Agreement, the Customer shall track during the high water demand period June through 216 August the operational control components of its Retail Water System, including, at a 217 minimum, reservoir storage capacity and flow controls, and provide the data collected to 218 the District in accordance with procedures and on a schedule as established by the WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 8 Packet Pg. 286 7.1.a 219 Wholesale Committee. 220 221 SECTION VI. - WHOLESALE COMMITTEE 222 223 The District shall establish and staff, and the Customer shall participate in, a wholesale 224 committee ("Wholesale Committee") composed of the District and each Wholesale Customer. 225 Each Wholesale Customer shall designate in writing a representative to serve on the Wholesale 226 Committee. A representative may be replaced by a written designation of the committee 227 member. The Wholesale Committee shall have the powers and authority as set forth below: 228 1. Advisory Powers and Authority. The Wholesale Committee shall review and advise 229 the District on the following topics or issues: 230 a. Proposed wholesale rate changes, including Administrative Time; 231 b. Proposed multi -year wholesale capital improvement plans; 232 c. Coordination with the District on day-to-day operations relating to high water 233 demand; 234 d. Proposed bond issues for wholesale system capital improvements; 235 e. Changes in District standards that would apply to wholesale improvements; 236 f. Proposed modifications to the Everett Supply Contract; 237 g. Proposed regulatory changes that could potentially impact wholesale customers; 238 h. Day-to-day operational issues and coordination efforts; and 239 i. District Finance Option 240 241 2. Approval Powers and Authority. The Wholesale Committee shall review and approve 242 of the following topics: 243 a. The District's Emergency/Drought Response Plan; 244 b. Limits on cash funded wholesale system capital improvements; and 245 c. "Other Program Funding" as defined and used in this Agreement. 246 Approval will require a majority vote of the Wholesale Customers plus District. 247 The Wholesale Committee shall meet annually by the 15t' of March to review the 248 proposed wholesale rates and, as necessary, to address the other topics as outlined above. A 249 meeting may be called by any member of the Wholesale Committee. The Wholesale WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 9 Packet Pg. 287 7.1.a 250 Committee shall evaluate each Wholesale Customer's operational efficiency by the end of each 251 year and provide a report and recommendation to the District's Board of Commissioners on the 252 summarized data of the Wholesale Customers' tracking of high water demand to identify 253 potential efficiency measures to be implemented under the state -mandated Water Use 254 Efficiency Rule. Each Wholesale Customer shall receive a copy of the report. 255 256 SECTION VII. - MASTER METER 257 258 All water delivered by the District to Customer shall be measured by a Master 259 Meter. All Master Meters, including vaults and appurtenances, will be owned, maintained, 260 repaired, replaced and upgraded by the District and the cost thereof included in the 261 Wholesale Water Cost. The District shall own all facilities from the connection to the 262 District pipeline to the upstream flange of the valve downstream of the Master Meter. The 263 cost of a new Master Meter requested by the Customer, including appurtenances and 264 installation, shall be paid by the Customer. Relocation of a Master Meter necessitated by 265 the Customer shall be paid by the Customer. 266 The District shall establish standards for Master Meters, including appurtenances 267 and access to flow data. Access to the Master Meter and the flow records shall be made 268 available to the Customer upon request. The Master Meter shall be checked by the District 269 on a schedule and for accuracy per the manufacturer's recommendation and the cost thereof 270 included in the Wholesale Water Cost. Either the District or the Customer may request 271 additional tests. The costs of additional tests shall borne equally, if both Parties agree to 272 the test; otherwise, by the Party requesting the test, unless the meter is not performing 273 within the manufacturer's specification, whereupon the benefited Party shall pay for the 274 test. Any adjustment to charges for water supplied shall be determined by the average water 275 use of the three prior years for the same period, unless some other method is agreed upon. 276 Either a credit or an additional billing calculated at the applicable Wholesale Water Rate 277 shall accrue to the appropriate party. If review of the meter records does not establish when 278 the change in accuracy occurred, the period of adjustment shall be one-half of the period 279 since the last meter calibration, not to exceed 12 months. 280 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 10 Packet Pg. 288 7.1.a 281 SECTION VIII. - AREA OF USE 282 283 The Customer shall not furnish service under any terms to services or systems other than 284 those within its approved service area as defined within its Water Comprehensive Plan without c a 285 first receiving written approval of the District. The Customer currently serves other water 286 suppliers or the service area of such suppliers by agreement. Those agreements are identified on cn 287 Exhibit D and continued service to those suppliers is hereby approved by District. L 288 a E 289 SECTION IX. - WATER QUALITY U ti 290 0 N 291 The water delivered by the District to the Master Meter shall comply with state and 292 federal standards for drinking water and be of the same standard and quality normally c 0 293 delivered to the District's other customers. The District shall not be liable for any a� a� 294 degradation of water quality and resulting damages that may occur beyond the Master = 295 Meter, including liability for acts of sabotage. Customer shall operate its system in a 296 conformance with law and in a manner which does not impair the water quality of the 297 "Wholesale Water System." N 298 a 299 SECTION X. - SUPPLY TO DISTRICT -OWNED SERVICES TRANSMITTED E 300 THROUGH CUSTOMER MAINS 301 U) 302 The District shall have the right to continue to serve its Retail Water System with L 303 water transmitted through the Customer's Master Meter and Retail Water System. Every •N 304 two months, the District shall read meters in that portion of the District's Retail Water a 305 System supplied through Customer's Master Meter and Retail Water System. The volume 306 of water shown by meter reading shall be deducted from the total Master Meter reading for 307 the month in which these meters are read, plus 25% added for meter losses, flushing, leakage 308 and other authorized unmetered usage. 309 310 311 312 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 11 Packet Pg. 289 7.1.a 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 SECTION XI. - WHOLESALE WATER RATE Wholesale Customers shall pay a Wholesale Water Rate that shall be adjusted annually on April 1 and shall be effective on that date. The Wholesale Water Rate shall recover the District's Wholesale Water Cost computed by the following formula: R=E+M+P+(ED+FD)+CFI+DFO+O Q Where: R = Wholesale Water Rate ($/CCF) computed to the nearest ten -thousandth of a dollar E = The District's cost of Purchased Water ($/CCF) M = Wholesale M&O Costs for the prior calendar year, excluding Power Costs P = Power Costs for the prior calendar year [Wholesale -Related Portion Only] ED = Existing Wholesale Debt including Principal + Interest FD = Future Wholesale Debt Service including Principal + Interest CFI = Cash (Rate) Funded Wholesale Facility Improvements DFO = District Finance Option O = Other Program Funding as may be deemed appropriate by the Wholesale Committee Q = Quantity of Water Supplied (CCF) in the prior calendar year measured by the Wholesale Customers' Master Meters In determining the Wholesale Water Rate, the District shall be governed by the following principles: 1. Revenue recovery for debt service shall be based upon the debt service (payment) schedule associated with each debt issue. Whenever the District issues re- funding debt, it shall analyze the refunding issue to determine an equitable allocation of principal and interest to the Wholesale Water Rate. The Wholesale Committee shall be convened to review the allocation for either a new debt issue or a refunding issue. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 290 7.1.a 344 345 2. In the year in which the District proposes to issue a new long-term debt 346 instrument to finance, in whole or in part, the construction of or improvements to 347 Wholesale Facilities, the cost attributable to Wholesale Facilities, including projected a 348 principal, interest, reserve payments, and debt service, incurred by the District for that E 349 year shall be included in the Wholesale Water Rate. The cost of such debt shall be r Cn 350 allocated to the Wholesale Customers, over the life of the debt issue, according to the 351 specific use of proceeds from that debt issuance. At the end of the year, and after the a E 352 debt has been issued, the debt issue is considered "Existing Wholesale Debt" for purposes U 353 of establishing wholesale water rates in subsequent years. c N 354 355 3. Whenever financially feasible, debt service coverage shall be met by the o 356 District's overall financial operations (retail and wholesale). If debt service coverage a� 357 cannot be met by the District's overall financial operations, then the Wholesale Water a� = 358 Rate shall be adjusted to include a component sufficient to meet the specific debt service 359 coverage covenants. a 360 N cm 361 4. Every fifth (5) year commencing in the year 2015, the District shall re - a 362 determine Wholesale M&O Costs for the purpose of setting the Wholesale Water Rate E a� 363 for that year. In each of the subsequent four years, the Wholesale M&O Cost (M) shall 364 be escalated by the consumer price index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) 2 365 (Seattle/Tacoma/Bremerton metropolitan area) December to December or a comparable CU a� 366 index, if that index is unavailable; provided that in any year, the District may, at its 367 discretion, forego escalation of cost according to the index and determine the actual a� L 368 Wholesale M&O Costs that year. E 0 U 369 ti 370 5. Power Costs attributable to the Wholesale Customers shall be determined 371 when the Wholesale Water Rate is re -calculated and shall be equal to the following: 372 P = (District's prior calendar year cost of power at Wholesale Facilities identified on 373 Exhibit B, and as Exhibit B may be amended) times (the Wholesale Customers' 374 combined prior calendar year volumetric use of water as recorded on Master Meters WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 13 Packet Pg. 291 7.1.a 375 identified on Exhibit B, and as Exhibit B may be amended) divided by (the District's 376 prior calendar year volumetric use of water as recorded at the District's Master Maters at 377 the Evergreen Way Pump Stations. 378 379 6. The CFI component of the Wholesale Water Rate shall be determined by 380 the District after a review of the District's 5-year capital improvement plan by the 381 Wholesale Committee. The Wholesale Committee shall approve CFI funding for each 382 year of the five (5) year capital improvement plan, after considering the different 383 financial and rate impacts of funding wholesale projects with cash or by debt and such 384 other factors deemed relevant by the Committee. 385 386 7. Annually, before the Wholesale Water rate is developed, the Wholesale 387 Committee shall review and approve what, if any, Other Program Funding, including 388 costs incurred by the District that are not otherwise included in the Wholesale Water 389 Cost, should be allocated to Wholesale Customers and included in the Wholesale Water 390 Rate. Approval will require a majority vote of the Wholesale Customers plus District. 391 392 8. The District shall establish a separate wholesale capital improvement 393 sinking fund (reserve) to segregate and account for certain revenues received from the 394 Wholesale Customers as identified in this Agreement. The sinking fund shall contain the 395 balance in the bond reserve fund as identified in the current wholesale contract. The 396 District shall deposit into the wholesale capital improvement sinking fund all revenues 397 received from: 398 399 A. The Cash (Rate) Funded Improvements (CFI) component of the 400 Wholesale Water Rate; and 401 B. Wholesale Water Rates to meet the minimum debt service coverage 402 ratio requirements (rate covenant). 403 404 Interest earned on the balance of the Wholesale Capital Improvement Sinking 405 Fund shall be retained in the sinking fund and credited to the sinking fund on a monthly WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 14 Packet Pg. 292 7.1.a l 406 basis in a manner consistent with the methodology the District uses to allocate interest to 407 its funds. 408 Except as otherwise provided, all funds deposited into the Wholesale Capital 409 Improvement Sinking Fund shall be applied to the cost of wholesale capital improvement 410 projects undertaken by the District. On the recommendation of the Wholesale Committee 411 the District may use these funds to pay the cost of any other wholesale -related activity 412 (e.g. early buy -down of debt, buy -down a rate adjustment, rate transition, etc.). 413 414 9. Whenever a component of the Wholesale Water Cost is determined by 415 meter readings and some condition (e.g. meter failure, emergency conditions [e.g. 416 earthquake]) would make the use of those readings unreasonable or inequitable to the 417 District or to the Wholesale Customers, the District shall use its best and reasonable 418 judgment to "normalize" the volumetric usage data for purposes of establishing the 419 affected component of the Wholesale Water Rate. 420 421 10. The District may utilize District funds to finance Wholesale Facility 422 improvements, the funding size of which is not practical for issuance of bonds, and the 423 Cash (Rate) Funded Wholesale Facility Improvements option has not been approved by 424 the Wholesale Committee. The capital funds necessary for the improvement would be 425 provided by the District subject to reimbursement through wholesale water rates for a 426 term not to exceed ten (10) years. The rate would be determined based upon the average 427 rate of investments for District funds for the prior year. The rate may be adjusted 428 annually utilizing the District's annual investment rate for the prior year. The District 429 also reserves the right to terminate this funding option at any time during the term by 430 adding the remaining funds yet to be paid to a larger bond issue. If so elected, the 431 wholesale portion would be the pro rata share of the bond issue at the terms of the bond 432 issue. 433 434 435 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 15. Packet Pg. 293 7.1.a 436 SECTION XII. - BILLING & PAYMENT 437 438 The District shall bill the Customer for water supplied under this Agreement on regular 439 monthly intervals. 440 The Master Meters shall be read and recorded on or about the last normal work day of the 441 month in which the service was furnished. Billing to the Customer shall be made by the 1 Oth day of 442 the month following, and payment to the District is due by the 30th day of the month in which the 443 statement is received. If any payment or portion thereof due the District shall remain unpaid for 444 25 days following its due date, the Customer shall be charged with and pay to the District interest 445 on the amount unpaid from its due date until paid at the rate of eight (8)% per annum. 446 If any or all of a bill is in dispute, the Customer shall pay the amount as billed and both 447 the District and the Customer shall agree to the time line to resolve the disputed amount. If any 448 material error, an amount greater than $1,000 per month is discovered in the rate calculation, 449 billing, payment, interest allocation, or any other calculation or assumption, the District shall 450 correct the error retroactively from the date of receipt of notice of the error backwards for a 451 period of up to three (3) years or as mutually agreed. The $1,000 amount shall be adjusted for 452 inflation every five (5) years with CPI-U as described in Section XI of this agreement. 453 454 SECTION XIII. - TERM & EXPIRATION 455 456 (1) The term of this Agreement shall be from its effective date until January 1, 2055. 457 The Parties may renew this Agreement by mutual written agreement upon such terms and 458 conditions as the Parties may later agree. 459 (2) If the Customer shall cease to take water from the District without the District's 460 consent, the Customer shall remain liable for its proportionate share of the then existing wholesale 461 bonded indebtedness issued before January 1, 2055 as may at that time be determined including 462 credits for certain payments and recognition given to the growth experienced in the Customer, District, 463 and all other Wholesale Customers. This liability shall continue only until such time as all or 464 part of the water supply no longer taken by the Customer from the District is sold by the District 465 to another party. In that event, liability shall be reallocated, in whole or in part, to the new 466 customer. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 16 Packet Pg. 294 7.1.a 467 (3) If the District shall cease to supply water to the Customer without the Customer's 468 consent, the Customer shall cease to be liable for its proportionate share of the wholesale bonded 469 indebtedness as described in Subsection 2 above. 470 471 SECTION XIV. - NOTICE OF NEGOTIATION 472 473 The Customer shall receive timely written notice of negotiation with City of Everett for a 474 rate change or additional water and the Customer shall have the right to be present at such meetings. 475 476 SECTION XV. - FORCE MAJEURE AND CHANGES IN LAW 477 478 Neither Party hereto shall be considered to be in default in respect to any obligations 479 hereunder if prevented from fulfilling such obligations due to conditions beyond their reasonable 480 control or due to changes in state or federal law. If a Party is unable to perform in whole or in 481 part because of such condition or change in the law, the Party shall diligently and promptly take 482 reasonable steps to allow it to perform. The Parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the 483 inability or preclusion of the City of Everett to perform, in whole or material part, the Everett 484 Supply Agreement caused by an order or directive of governmental authority or a court with 485 jurisdiction shall constitute a force majeure or change in law event hereunder. 486 487 SECTION XVI. - LEGAL RELATIONS 488 489 Each Party shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other from any and all claims, 490 demands, suits, and judgments arising out of its conduct. If, and to the extent, the Parties are 491 both liable to a third party claimant, each Party shall be responsible to the extent of its fault, and 492 shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other for its fault. The foregoing indemnity is 493 specifically and expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under 494 Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, but only with respect to the other Party 495 only, and only to the extent necessary to provide each Party with a full and complete indemnity 496 of claims made by the other Party's employees. The Parties acknowledge that these provisions 497 were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 17 Packet Pg. 295 7.1.a 498 SECTION XVII. - DISPUTE RESOLUTION 499 500 The Parties are committed to working cooperatively in resolving all matters related to this 501 Agreement and achieving its intent and purpose. If a dispute should arise, the Parties agree to 502 meet on an informal basis within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of written notice of the 503 dispute submitted by a Party to attempt to resolve the dispute. 504 If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute on an informal basis within thirty (30) 505 days, the Parties agree they shall utilize mediation. Each Party shall be responsible for the costs 506 of their own legal representation and pro rata cost of mediator. 507 Any dispute arising under this Agreement that is not resolved pursuant to the mediation 508 process may, upon mutual agreement of the Parties, if such agreement occurs within twenty 509 (20) calendar days of the failure of the Parties to reach resolution through mediation, be resolved 510 by binding arbitration by a single arbitrator. Within seven (7) calendar days of the date the 511 Parties agree to arbitration, each Party shall provide the other Party with the names of three (3) 512 neutral arbitrators having experience in the subject matter of the dispute and in arbitrating 513 disputes. The Parties will thereafter attempt in good faith to select an arbitrator from this panel 514 of six (6) potential arbitrators. 515 If the Parties are unable to agree upon a single arbitrator within twenty (20) calendar days 516 from the date the Parties agree to binding arbitration, then each Party shall designate one (1) 517 arbitrator from its panel of three (3) arbitrators. The two (2) designated arbitrators shall then 518 select a third arbitrator from the remaining arbitrator panel members, and this third arbitrator 519 shall act and serve as the single arbitrator for the dispute. The Parties shall equally split the 520 arbitrator's fee and all arbitration expenses. The prevailing party at arbitration shall be entitled to 521 an award by the arbitrator of its attorneys' fees and costs at the arbitrator's discretion. 522 The Parties agree that this dispute resolution process shall precede any action in a judicial 523 or quasi-judicial tribunal. 524 The Parties also agree that at all times pending resolution of the dispute, the Parties shall 525 continue to perform their respective duties and obligations in accordance with the terms and 526 conditions of this Agreement. The intent of the Parties is to preserve the status quo under the 527 Agreement. By way of illustration and not limitation, the Parties wish to assure uninterrupted 528 water service and compliance with the payment provisions of Section XII. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 18 Packet Pg. 296 7.1.a 529 SECTION XVIII. - GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE 530 531 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the 532 state of Washington. Any lawsuit or judicial action or proceeding arising out of or relating to 533 this Agreement that could not be resolved through Dispute Resolution, shall be heard in the 534 Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for Snohomish County. 535 536 SECTION IXX. - NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES 537 538 Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement is intended 539 to confer upon any person or entity, other than the Parties hereto, any rights, benefits, or 540 obligations. No such third -party shall have any right to enforce any of the provisions of this 541 Agreement unless expressly stated otherwise herein. 542 543 SECTION XX. - LIMITATION ON DAMAGES 544 545 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, neither the District nor the 546 Customer shall be liable to the other under or pursuant to this Agreement for indirect, 547 incidental, special, exemplary, punitive, or consequential damages, including but not limited 548 to damages for lost profits, revenues or benefits, loss of property use, the cost of capital, or 549 the cost of purchased or replacement water. 550 551 SECTION XXI. - GENERAL PROVISIONS 552 553 (1) Waiver: A waiver by either Party of any terms or conditions of this 554 Agreement shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any other term or condition, 555 nor shall the waiver of any breach be deemed or construed to constitute a waiver of any 556 subsequent breach, whether of the same or any other term or condition of this Agreement. 557 (2) Assignment: Except where one of the Parties merges, consolidates or 558 combines with another entity neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or 559 obligations created hereunder may be assigned by either Party without the written consent of WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 19 Packet Pg. 297 7.1.a 560 the other Party. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the 561 successors and assigns of the respective Parties. 562 (3) Notices: Any notices required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be given 563 in writing and shall be delivered (a) in person, (b) by certified mail, postage prepaid, return 564 receipt requested, (c) by electronic transmission in the form of email or facsimile, or (d) by a 565 commercial overnight courier that guarantees next day delivery and provides a receipt, and such 566 notices shall be addressed as follows: 567 568 To the Customer: 569 Public Works Director 570 City of Edmonds 571 7110 210' Street SW 572 Edmonds, WA 98026 573 Fax: 425-774-6057 574 575 To the District: 576 General Manager 577 Alderwood Water & Wastewater District 578 3626 - 156th Street SW 579 Lynnwood, Washington 98087 580 Fax: 425-742-4562 581 582 or to such other address designated in writing by the addressee. 583 (4) Entirety: All prior negotiations and agreements between the parties hereto 584 relating to the subject matter hereof are merged into and superseded by this Agreement, 585 which shall constitute the entire agreement between the Customer and the District concerning 586 the sale of water to the Customer. 587 (5) Authority: Each Party represents and warrants that it has the power and legal 588 authority to enter into this Agreement. The individual(s) executing this Agreement on behalf 589 of the respective Party represents and warrants that such individual has the power and 590 authority to do so. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 20 Packet Pg. 298 7.1.a 591 (6) Effective Date: This Agreement shall become effective ("Effective Date") 592 upon the date of the expiration or termination of the existing contract for wholesale water 593 supply between the Parties dated the 20th day of September 2010. 594 (7) Attorneys' Fees and Costs: In the event that either Party commences any legal 595 action or proceeding relating to the provisions or enforcement of this Agreement, the 596 prevailing party shall be entitled to receive, and the non -prevailing party shall pay, its 597 reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, including those incurred in any appeal. 598 (8) Exhibits Incorporated by Reference: Any exhibits attached to this Agreement 599 are fully incorporated herein by this reference. 600 (9) Titles to sections and subsections in this Agreement are for reference purposes 601 only and shall have no substantive effect. 602 (10) In the event of a material breach or default of this Agreement by either of the 603 Parties, the Parties acknowledge that it may be difficult to measure the resulting damages and 604 that monetary damages may not provide a complete or adequate remedy. Accordingly, the 605 non -defaulting Party, in addition to damages and any other relief sought or recovered, shall 606 be entitled to seek injunctive relief and the specific performance of the terms and conditions 607 of this Agreement. 608 (11) If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is determined to be void, 609 unenforceable or limited in its application or effect in a legal proceeding, such determination 610 shall not affect any other provisions in this Agreement and all other provisions shall remain 611 in full force and effect. 612 (12) Any new water Wholesale Customer Agreement utilizing the same Wholesale 613 Water Facilities as included in the Agreement, shall have the same terms and conditions as 614 this Agreement, with the exclusion of Exhibits A, D and E. 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 21 Packet Pg. 299 7.1.a 622 CITY OF EDMONDS 623 A Municipal Corporation 624 625 626 By: 627 Its: /i't o 0- 628 Date: y —)® - /D 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 O..i E, 646 647 MR ATTEST: d. City Clerk APPR N&Ta-.qr City Attorney WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT A Municipal Corporation By: Its: EQAi2D PRe�I DENT Date: SERVEM 13Et2 / , 2010 pg. 22 Packet Pg. 300 7.1.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT A — QUANTITY OF WATER TO BE PURCHASED All quantities in Million Gallons ber Dav (MGD) 2010 3.6 7.1 2020 3.6 7.2 2050 4.6 9.0 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 23 Packet Pg. 301 7.1.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT B - WHOLESALE FACILITIES The water lines including transmission facilities are shown on a separate map exhibit. The following is a list of the wholesale facilities referenced in the Agreement, in addition to the water lines shown on the separate map. Evergreen Way Pump Station Site (6003 Evergreen Way, Everett) Pump Station No. 1 Pump Station No. 2 Maintenance and Operation Site (15204 35d' Avenue W, Lynnwood) Reservoir No. 1 Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets Administration Site (3626 156' Street SW, Lynnwood) Reservoir No. 2 Reservoir No. 3 Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets Edmonds Master Meter Site (168d' Street SW and 62nd Avenue W, Edmonds) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets Lynnwood Master Meter Site (Spruce Way and 164d' Street SW, Lynnwood) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets Mountlake Terrace Master Meter Site (212d' Street SW and 44d' Avenue W, Mountlake Terrace) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets (Emergency supply at 38d' Avenue W and 228d' Street SW) Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District Meter Site (Harbour Point Boulevard and St. Andrews Drive; and Beverly Park Road and Center Road, Mukilteo) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 24 Packet Pg. 302 ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT C - REGIONAL FACILITIES The regional water lines and larger water transmission facilities are shown on a separate map exhibit. The following list contains additional regional facilities as referenced in the Agreement. Evergreen Way Pump Station Site (6003 Evergreen Way, Everett) Leased Site Pump Station No. 1 Pump Station No. 2 Maintenance and Operation Site (15204 35th Avenue W, Lynnwood) Site Reservoir No. 1 High Tank No. 1 High Tank No. 2 Booster Pump Station Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets Maintenance and Operation Administration Building Shop Facility Warehouse Facilities Material Storage Facilities Administration Site (3626 156th Street SW, Lynnwood) Site District Administration Building Reservoir No. 2 Reservoir No. 3 Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 25 Packet Pg. 303 7.1.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D — CUSTOMERS WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT TO OTHER SUPPLIERS NONE IDENTIFIED WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 26 Packet Pg. 304 7.1.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT E — MASTER METER LOCATION 168d' Street SW and 62nd Avenue W WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 27 Packet Pg. 305 aa}eM dul03 LOZ 841 uo fuiJeaH allgnd : 6ZZZ) veld W04S (S aa;eM anlsuayaiduaoo LL0Z ;;uauayae1JV eo 0 � M a INTERLOCAL OPERATING AGREEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS AND OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT a RELATING TO WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES WITIIIN THE EDMONDS CITY LD41TS 7'4 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of gn j 1� tf ., 2004, by and between the City of Edmonds, a Washington, non -charter optional municipal code city (the "City") and the Olympic View Water and Sewer District, a special purpose municipal corporation (the "District"); WHEREAS, the City is the local government with authority and jurisdiction with respect to the territory within its corporate boundaries; and WHEREAS, the District provides water and sanitary sewer service to properties located in the District and properties lying within the City's corporate boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City owns and operates water and sanitary sewer utilities for the vast majority of property within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, the District and City agree that the District has provided its service area, including an area now located within the City of Edmonds, with water and sanitary sewer services for many years; and WHEREAS, the City desires to assure its residents of water and sanitary sewer services which comply with federal, state and local law, which will protect the public's health safety and welfare, and will be provided under uniform standards of service; and WHEREAS, the City and District have separately negotiated a ten-year Franchise Agreement to establish the terms and conditions under which the District is granted the authority to maintain its water and sewer system within the City's rights -of -way, subject to simultaneous execution with this document, and WHEREAS, the City and District are authorized under Chapter 39.34, RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, and RCW 35.13A.070 to contract for the coordinated exercise of powers and sharing of resources for the efficient delivery of services to their residents, and the governing bodies have passed resolutions approving the execution of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and provisions contained herein, and the Franchise Agreement executed contemporaneously by the parties, the City and District agree as follows: Section 1. E=ose. It is the purpose of this Agreement to guide the activities, resources and efforts of the City and District in order to provide the citizens of the City and the ratepayers served by the District with efficient, high quality and well -maintained water and sanitary 1W 5S572711D0C;1 /00006.900000/) 6/11/200411:13 AM as}eM dlu03 LM 841 uo BUIMOH allgnd : 6ZZZ) veld W04S S aa;eM aAlsuayaidwOo LI,OZ :;uauayaeIIV � eo o � M a sewerage wastewater systems at a reasonable cost and define the legal relationship between the parties with regard to the exercise of the City's statutory authority pursuant to RCW 35.13A for M the term of this Agreement. a Section 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Interlocal Operating Agreement shall be indefinite and shall remain in effect until terminated as provided in this Agreement. Section 3. City Responsibilities: 3.1 Franchise Grant to the District. The City shall grant a non-exclusive franchise to the District in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein as fully as if herein set forth, for an initial term of ten (10) years, commencing on the date of execution and terminating as provided herein. After the first year of the agreement, the parties intent is to create a ten-year rolling term for the mutual stability of their working relationship. In consideration of the promises contained herein and for so long as this Agreement is in effect, the City shall charge a franchise fee of $10 per year. Such franchise may be renewed upon termination under the most favorable terms offered to a public utility by the City and renewal shall not be unreasonably withheld, so long as the District complies with all conditions thereof. If this Agreement is approved by the District on or before June 30, 2004, the City shall pay the costs associated with publication of the franchise. Otherwise, the District shall pay all such costs. 3.2 Assumption by the Citv. The City agrees, recognizing the long term planning horizon necessary, to provide and maintain adequate municipal water and sewer facilities and the need for long term financing of these high cost assets, and that in consideration of the "Interlocal Operating Agreement Fee" to be paid by thelDistrict to the City as set forth herein in Section 4 of this Agreement, and the other terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, as well as in the Franchise Agreement, it shall not, during the pendency of this Agreement, exercise its statutory authority granted under Chapter 35.13A RCW, as currently in effect or as may hereafter be amended in the future, to assume jurisdiction over the District or any District responsibilities, property, facilities or equipment within the City's corporate limits, including future annexed areas ("assummption"). 3.2.1 During the first ten years of the agreement, the City shall not commence the process of assumption. 3.2.2 If notice of termination is given pursuant to Section 5, the city may commence the process of assumption beginning three years prior to the termination date, provided, however, that: 3.2.2.1 The process of assumption shall not be completed through final legislative and administrative action during the pendency of this Agreement; and 3.2.2.2 In no event shall the process of assumption be commenced during the initial ten years of the Agreement. (wss572712.DOc; 1/00006s00000/) 6/111200411:13 AM 2 as}eM diu03 LM ay; uo BUIMOH 011gnd : 6ZZZ) veld W04S S aa;eM anlsuayaidwOo LL0Z :;u0wt43eIJV eo 3.3 Fees and Char. The City shall not during the term of this Agreement, impose any new fees on the District for City costs and services addressed and compensated for in the Franchise Agreement or in this Interlocal Operating Agreement. 3.4 Future Statute Authorizing City Utility Tax on the District. In the event that the Washington State Legislature should in the future authorize the City to impose a utility tart upon a district based upon the district's revenues, or upon any other basis, the payments herein below provided as the District's contractual consideration for this Agreement, shall be credited against such a utility tax as the City may impose and the District shall be obligated to pay only the statutorily defined tax liability in excess thereof; provided, however, this section shall not allow a credit against consideration of this Agreement for generally applicable regulatory fees or revenue generating charges or taxes that may be authorized by law as applicable to the District and adopted by the City during the term of this Agreement other than such a utility tax. 3.4.1 PassMEN-gh of Excess Utility Tax. In the event a utility tax on the District by the City is ultimately authorized by law, the District may remit such tax by passing the cost therefor onto the District's ratepayers residing within the City as a separate billing item. Section 4. The District's Resnonsibilities. In consideration of the City's commitments above and the concomitant Franchise Agreement, the District makes the following undertakings. 4.1 In consideration of and compensation for the City's undertakings under this Agreement from an exercise of its rights, as the statute now exists or may hereafter be amended, and the rights granted the District under a Franchise to operate its existing and future water and sewer facilities within the City's corporate limits, including any future annexed areas for the term of this Agreement, the District agrees to pay the City an "Interlocal Operating Fee" equal to 6% of customer billings, provided, however, that if the City changes the water and/or sewer utility tax levied on its customers, the percentage shall be changed to the same extent. 4.1.1 Pass -Through of Interlocal Operating Agreement Fee. The District may pass the cost of the Interlocal Operating Agreement Fee onto the District's ratepayers residing within the City as a separate billing item. 4.2 Schedule of Payments. The initial schedule of payments shall be equal to 6% of water and sewer billings which occur within the Edmonds City limits. Payments shall be remitted quarterly within thirty (30) days of the close of the quarter. In order to finally adjust annual payment to reflect late charges and collections and other adjustments, any payment necessary to finally adjust and correct the payments for each year shall be made by June 30 of the following year. Payment for the year of execution (2004), shall be made by February 15, 2005, and finally corrected by June 30, 2005. 4.3 Annexation. In the event that the City shall in the future annex property in accordance with the provisions of statute, and all or any part of said annexed area shall be within the service area of the District, such service area shall, upon the annexation of the areas by the City, be subject to the terms of this Agreement (wss572712.DOC:1l00006.9000001) 6111/200411:13 AM 3 00 0 M a. a� M a. as}eM du1o3 L6OZ 841 uo GulMaH allgnd 6ZZZ) veld W04S (S aa;eM anlsuayaidwOO LLOZ :;uauayaeIIV eo ' ti Section 5. Termination. In addition to all of the rights and powers to remedy default, including specific performance, both parties reserve the right to revoke and terminate this Agreement in the event of a substantial violation or breach of its terms and conditions. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving written notice ten (10) years in advance of the date of termination. The Agreement may be terminated or amended at any time with the express written consent of both parties. Section 6. Indemnification. The parties shall indemnify and hold harmless each other and their respective officers, agents and employees from any and all costs, claims or liabilities of any nature, including reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses for or on account of injuries or damage to any persons or property resulting from the negligent activities or omissions of that party or its respective agents or employees and arising from the performance of this Agreement. Section 7. Definitions. `The terms used in this Agreement, if not defined herein, shall have their meanings as defined in any other documents executed contemporaneously or in conjunction with this Agreement. Section 8. Remedies; No Waiver. In addition to the remedies provided by law, this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable by any party. The -failure of either party to exercise any right or enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of such right or enforcement remedy. The prevailing party in any proceeding to enforce this Agreement or interpret its terms shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees. Section 9. Venues. In the event' of litigation pertaining to this Agreement, the exclusive venues and places of jurisdiction shall be in Snohomish County, Washington. Section 10. Alternative Disoute Resolution — Arbitration. Except as otherwise provided under applicable state law, any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with, or relating to, this Agreement or any breach or alleged reach of this Agreement, shall be submitted to, and settled by arbitration to be held in Snohomish County, Washington in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7.04 of the Revised Code of Washington, as amended, and with respect to matters not covered in such statute, by the rules of the American Arbitration Association; provided, however, that in the event of any conflict between such statute and such rules, the provisions of the statute shall control; and provided further, that notwithstanding anything in such statute or rules to the contrary; (a) the arbitrator's decision and award shall be made according to the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the applicable law, and such award shall set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law of the arbitrator upon which the award is based in the same manner as is required in a trial before a judge of the Superior Court of the State of Washington; (b) the arbitrator shall award attorney's fees to the prevailing party; and (c) in any such arbitration, there shall be a single arbitrator and any decision made shall be final, binding and conclusive on the parties. The fees of the arbitrator shall be borne equally by the parties except that, in the discretion of the arbitrator, any award may include a parry's share of such fee if the arbitrator determines that the dispute, controversy or claim was submitted to arbitration as a dilatory tactic, was frivolous or was in bad faith. { W3s57Z712.DOC; I/OM6.900000/1 6/11/200411:13 AM 4 as}eM diuo3 LOZ ay; uo fuiJeaH allgnd : 6ZZZ) veld W04S (S aa;eM aAlsuayaidwOO LLOZ :;uauayaeIJV eo Section 11. Binding. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of an be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns. Section 12. IRn )rceabilitv. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, the entire Agreement shall be held to be unenforceable. To the fullest extent permitted by law, and absent any significant change in circumstances, neither party shall be a party to, nor otherwise support a legal action challenging the legality,*validity or enforceability of this Agreement, or any term thereof. Neither party shall fund or initiate a legislative lobbying effort to prohibit or invalidate agreements of this type, provided, however, nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit the parties from membership in associations such as the Association of Washington Cities or the Washington Association of Water and Sewer Districts. Section 13. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Washington. Section 14. Provisions required by RCW 39.34.030 and .040. 14.1 No separate entity is created. 14.2 No joint financing or budgeting is created. 14.3 No joint undertaking is anticipated and no administrator or joint board required. 14.4 No property shall be field jointly by the parties under this Agreement. 14.5 This Agreement shall become effective when filed with the Snohomish County Auditor. Section 15. Atto_ rneys' Fees. If either party employs an attorney to enforce any rights arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the prevailing party in such dispute shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. Section 16. Entire Agent. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter. It shall not be modified except by a written agreement signed -by bath parties. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any act of acquiescence on the part of either party, its agents, or employees, but only by an instrument in writing signed by an authorized officer of the party. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provision(s) or of the same provisions on another occasion. Section 17. Effective Date and Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect and binding irpon the parties hereto upon the execution of the Agreement. t W SS572711DOC;1 /00006.90Moo/} 6111n00411.13 AM 5 aa}eM dua03 L60Z ay; uo 6uPeaH 3Ilgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;s/(S aa;eM anlsuayaadwOO LL0Z :;u8w'43e11V ev T ti CITY OF EDMO S By. Mayo Gary enson ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED; Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE F C ORNEY: W. Scott Snyder OW"IC WEW WATER AND SEWER M STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) P66P G jgo?'p�OFL J G&Qdn A (L A4 /-5*vA 6 E'L On this day, personally appearedobefore me the of OLYMPIC VIEW WAT R AND SEWER DISTRICT and stated that he/she is authoriVed to sign this instrument on behalf of said company for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO (WSS572712.D0Q1/00006.900000/) 6/11/200411:13 AM me this c� �� day of `A (1 2004 5,.� �nYr�C�� YA rat�n n • 1�G 1,��2. u Print Name My Commission expires: tO 6 6 31:kr/`LY -- aa;eM dua00 LLOZ ay; uo 6uPeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM 9Alsuayaidwo0 LLOZ :;uawLJ3eJJV S N � M a WSS:jt:na 0 10/18/84 U Revised a 01/17/85 02/27/85 03/13/85 AGREEMENT FOR FURNISHING WATER AGREEMENT is reached this day between the City of Edmonds, Washington,_an,optional code city hereinafter referred to as "City", and Olympic View Water District hereinafter referred to as "District", WHEREAS, the District currently provides water directly through its mains and lines to properties located within the city limits of Edmonds and the boundaries of the Olympic View Water District, and WHEREAS, the District is willing to continue to supply said water to these customers, subject to the terms and condi- tions set forth herein, now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Water Furnished. The District agrees to supply an ade- quate supply of water to customers located within the city limits of the City and within the boundaries of the District, subject to such terms and conditions as the District shall provide and its water administrative code, Resolution 429, as currently enacted or amended in the future. 2. Billin2 and Payment. The District shall bill its indivi- dual customers directly for the amount of water furnished based upon their then current rates. The District shall be solely aa;eM duaoO LLOZ ay; uo 6uPeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM anlsuayaidwoo LLOZ :;uawL1oe;;y • M fC � � M a responsible for reading meters, determining the amount of water a, consumed by each customer, as well as any default or delinquent a payment by said customers. The District shall be responsible for collection of these monies and the City shall have no obligation whatsoever to make payment for or on behalf of any citizen. 3. Increase in Rate. It is understood by the parties that the water rates charged for the District are subject to change and may be increased from time to time. Such increases shall not affect any other term of this agreement. 4. Collection of Utility Tax. The District shall collect for and on behalf of the City of Edmonds utility taxes as the City has established those taxes or shall amend them from time to time. The utility tax on water shall be added directly to the customer's billing. The District will remit to the City the taxes received from such accounts on a monthly basis. 5. Newly Annexed Areas. It is understood by the parties that the City may annex certain areas presently in unincorporated Snohomish County are served by the District. The District agrees that upon annexation of any such area then served by the District, it will continue to supply water customers within that area under the terms of the agreement. 6. Standard Specifications. The parties agree and acknowledge that the City, through its subdivision code, building permit process and other forms of development review is empowered by and under state law to establish minimum standards for the construction of water lines, fixtures and appurtenances_ The - 2 - aa;eM dwOO LLOZ ay; uo 6uMeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM 9Alsuayaidwo0 LLOZ :;uauayoe;;y � M a District shall not approve or agree to the construction of any facility not in conformance with such minimum standards, a provided, however, that nothing herein shall be interpreted to require or prevent the District from requiring a higher level of improvement if such requirements and specifications are filed with the City. The City shall notify all development applicants that the applicant should investigate whether the development will require a contract with the District and that the District may require construction in conformance with its own set of requirements and specifications, A. PERMIT APPLICATION: Upon receipt of an application for any building permit or development approval for any tract of land within or adjacent to the service area of Olympic View Water District, the City shall furnish a copy of said permit or development approval application to the District. The District shall have the obligation to review the permit and to inform the City in writing within fifteen (15) business days whether any written or oral agreement exists between the District and any party which might inhibit, promote or affect development of the tract. Development approval for the purposes of this Section shall refer to applications for subdivision of land, planned residential development and any other application which in the opinion of the City's Community Services Director is preparatory to development of any tract of land. B. APPLICATION FOR SERVICE. The District shall provide the City with copies of all applications for service, 7, Indemnity. The District, its successors and assigns, agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all injuries or claims for damages of any kind or nature whatsoever arising either directly or indirectly from the furnishing of water to customers specified in this agreement, including but not limited - 3 - aa;eM dwOO LLOZ ay; uo 6uPeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM 9Alsuayaidwo0 LLOZ :;uawLJ3e;;y LO � M a. to injuries, or claims for damages arising from the installation, M construction, maintenance and repair of water lines, mains and a appurtenances and from meter reading, excepting loss or claim arising from the negligence of the City. 8. Term. This agreement shall be effective upon execution by the parties and shall continue until terminated by either party giving at least six (6) months written notice of intent to terminate the agreement. 9. Amendment. All amendments to this agreement shall be in writing and executed by both parties. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and there are no agree- ments, oral or otherwise, which bind the parties or supersede the express agreements contained herein. 10. Notice. Notice shall be given by depositing written notice in the U.S, mails, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties at the following addresses. Said notice shall be deemed received on the third day following posting in the U.S. mail. The addresses of the parties for the purposes of this section are as follows: City of Edmonds Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Olympic View Water District 23725 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 11. Assignment. Neither of the parties hereto shall have the right to assign this agreement or any of its rights and obli- gations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other - 4 - aa;eM dua00 LLOZ ay; uo 6uPeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM 9Alsuayaidwo0 LLOZ :;uawLjoe4jV party. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 12. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any term or condi- tion of this agreement shall be deemed or construed as waiving any other term or condition nor shall waiver of any breach be deemed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach. DATED this 21 day of Attest: City Clerk Approved as to Form: Off.Ic Ci y Attorney By OLYMP�C VIEW WATER STRICT By B yJ 5 -- Attest: CIT By By r �. . M a. m M a. 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 317 7.1.a 0006.900000 09/25/03 WSS/amg R:10/27/03gjz R:11/13/03gjz R:6/9/04gjz R:6/11/04gjz ORDINANCE NO.3506 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, GRANTING OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, REPLACE AND REPAIR A WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, RCW 35A.11.020 grants the City broad authority to regulate the use of the public right of way; and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 authorizes the City "to grant nonexclusive franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways, structures or places above or below the surface of the ground for facilities for public conveyances, for poles, conduits, tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and appurtenances thereof for transmission and distribution of electrical energy, signals and other methods of communication, for gas, steam and liquid fuels, for water, sewer and other private and publicly owned and operated facilities for public service," and WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the best interests of health, safety and welfare of residents of the Edmonds community to grant a non-exclusive franchise to the {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Pg. 318 7.1.a Olympic View Water and Sewer District for the operation of a water and sanitary sewer system within the City right-of-way, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions. The following terms contained herein, unless otherwise indicated, shall be defined as follows: 1.1 City. The City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, specifically including all areas incorporated therein as of the effective date of this ordinance and any other areas later added thereto by annexation or other means. 1.2 City Urban Growth Area. The urban growth area means that area defined by the City's comprehensive planning process. 1.3 Days: Calendar days. 1.4. Director: The Mayor or designee. 1.5. District: Olympic View Water and Sewer District. 1.6. Facilities: All pipes, access ways, pump stations, storage facilities, equipment, and appurtenances thereto, located in the City's right-of-way, utilized by the District in the operation of activities authorized by this Ordinance. The abandonment by District of any facilities as defined herein shall not act to remove the same from this definition. 1.7. Permittee: A person who has been granted a permit by the Permitting Authority, and District operating under Section 4.6 Blanket Permit of this agreement. 1.8 Permitting Authority: The City department authorized to process and grant permits (permitting authority) required to work in the City's right-of-way, or any agency authorized to perform this function on the City's behalf. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Permitting Authority {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Pg. 319 7.1.a shall include the designee of the department or agency head. 1.9 Person: An entity or natural person. 1.10 Right-of-way: As used herein shall refer to the surface of and the space along, above, and below any street, road, highway, freeway, lane, sidewalk, alley, court, boulevard, parkway, drive, utility easement, and/or road right-of-way now or hereafter held or administered by the City of Edmonds. 1.11 Olympic View Water & Sewer District Service Area: All the land located within the corporate boundaries of the District as they now or may in the future exist, plus those areas lying outside of the corporate boundaries of the District in which the District's water and sanitary sewer system sand appurtenances are now or may in the future be located. Section 2. Franchise. 2.1 Pursuant to RCW 35A.47.040 the City hereby grants to District, it's successors and assigns, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, a Franchise beginning on the effective date of this Ordinance. 2.2 This Franchise shall grant District the right, privilege and authority, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; to construct, operate, maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment and facilities related to its water and sanitary sewer systems in, under, on, across, over, through, along or below the right-of-way for the purpose of its water and sanitary sewer utility facilities as approved under City permits issued by the Permitting Authority pursuant to the Franchise and City ordinances. 2.3 This ordinance is to be construed as granting permission to District to go only upon any public right-of-way described herein. Permission to go upon any other property owned or controlled by the City must be sought from the City and may be approved on a case by case basis. Section 3. Non -Interference of Facilities. {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Pg. 320 7.1.a 3.1 District's Facilities shall be located, relocated and maintained within the right-of-way so as not to unreasonably interfere with the free and safe passage of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and ingress or egress to or from the abutting property and in accordance with the ordinances of the City and laws of the State of Washington. Nothing herein shall preclude District from affecting temporary road closures as reasonably necessary during construction or maintenance of its Facilities provided District receives prior City approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Whenever it is necessary for District, in the exercise of its rights under this Franchise, to make any excavation in the right-of-way, District shall, upon completion of such excavation, restore the surface of the right-of-way to a condition that meets the specifications established within the City of Edmonds Engineering development standards and pre -approved plans and in accordance with standards of general applicability imposed by the City by ordinance or administrative order. Section 4. Right -of- Way Management. 4.1 Excavation. 4.1.1 During any period of relocation or maintenance, all surface structures, if any, shall be erected and used in such places and positions within the right-of-way so as to interfere as little as possible with the safe and unobstructed passage of traffic and the unobstructed use of adjoining property. District shall at all times post and maintain proper barricades and comply with all applicable safety regulations during such period of construction as required by the ordinances of the City or state law, including RCW 39.04.180, for the construction of trench safety systems. 4.1.2 Whenever District excavates in any right-of-way for the purpose of installation, construction, repair, maintenance or relocation of its facilities, it shall apply to the City for a permit to do so in accord with the ordinances and regulations of the City requiring permits to operate in the right-of-way. In no case shall any such work commence within any right-of-way without a permit, except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance. During the progress of the work, District shall not unnecessarily obstruct the passage or use of the right-of-way, and shall provide the City with plans, maps, and information showing the {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - Packet Pg. 321 7.1.a proposed and final location of any facilities in accordance with Section 15 of this Ordinance. Approval shall be obtained in accordance with the provisions of Sections 4.6.2 and 4.6.3. 4.2 Abandonment of District's Facilities. District shall not abandon any of its facilities within the right-of-way without the prior written consent of the City. 4.3 Restoration after Construction. 4.3.1 District shall, after any installation, construction, relocation, maintenance, or repair of Facilities within the right-of-way, restore the right-of-way to City standard and at least the same condition existing prior to any such installation, construction, relocation, maintenance or repair. Survey monuments shall not be removed or destroyed without the District first obtaining the required Department of Natural Resources (DNR) permit in accordance with RCW 58.09.130 and WAC 332-120-030. All survey monuments, which have been disturbed or displaced by such work, shall be restored pursuant to all federal, state and local standards and specifications. District agrees to promptly complete all restoration work and to promptly repair any damage caused by such work at its sole cost and expense. 4.3.2 If it is determined that District has failed to restore the right-of-way in accordance with this Section, the City shall provide District with written notice, which shall include a description of actions the City believes necessary to restore the right-of-way. If the right-of-way is not restored in accordance with the City's notice within fifteen (15) days of that notice, or such longer period as may be specified in the notice, the City, or its authorized agent, may restore the right-of-way and District shall be responsible for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in restoring the right-of-way in accordance with this Section. The rights granted to the City under this Paragraph shall be in addition to those otherwise provided by this Franchise. 4.4 Bonding Requirement. District, as a public agency, is not required to comply with the City's standard bonding requirement for working in the City's right-of-way. {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - Packet Pg. 322 7.1.a 4.5 Emergency Work, Permit Waiver. In the event of an emergency where any facilities located in the right-of-way are broken or damaged, or if District's construction area for their facilities is in such a condition as to place the health or safety of any person or property in imminent danger, District shall immediately take necessary emergency measures to repair or remove its facilities without first applying for and obtaining a permit as required by this Franchise. However, this emergency provision shall not relieve District from later obtaining necessary permits for the emergency work. District shall apply for the required permits the next business day following the emergency work or as soon as practical thereafter given the nature and duration of the emergency. 4.6 Blanket Permit. The terms "Minor Activities" and "Blanket Activities" are defined in a specifically negotiated "Blanket Permit for Activity Within The Public right-of-way," which is incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, a copy of which has been filed with the City Clerk and identified by Clerk's Receiving Number Permittee shall be authorized to perform Minor Activities without a City permit of any kind and Blanket Activities under the terms and conditions of the Blanket Permit. All other activities will require a separate permit in accordance with City ordinances. 4.6.1 The Permittee shall pay the City a permit inspection/processing fee in the amount set out in Blanket Permit Definitions and as established by the City Council. 4.6.2 The Permittee shall provide a monthly list of Blanket Permit construction activity by the IOth of the following month listing the previous month's completed activity authorized under this Section. 4.6.3 For each separate use of the right-of-way under this Section, and prior to commencing any work on the right-of- way under this Section, the Permittee shall: At least twenty- four (24) hours in advance of entering the right-of-way, fax or otherwise deliver to the Permitting Authority a City Job Start Notification Form, as provided by the Permitting Authority. Said form shall include, at a minimum, the following information: street address nearest to the proposed work site and description of work to be {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - Packet Pg. 323 7.1.a performed. Permittee shall not commence work within the City right-of-way without approval and obtaining of a permit number and the Job Start Notification by the City Engineer or his designee. 4.6.4 The City reserves the right to alter the terms and conditions of Subsection 4.6 and of Blanket Permit by providing thirty (30) days written notice to the Permittee. Any change made pursuant to this Paragraph shall thereafter apply to all subsequent work performed pursuant to this Section. 4.6.6 In the event the Permittee fails to comply with any of the conditions set forth in this Section, the City may provide written notice of termination to operate under this Section to Permittee, stating with specificity, the basis for the termination of the Permittee's authority. 4.7 Safety. 4.7.1. District, in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local safety rules and regulations shall, at all times, employ ordinary care in the installation, maintenance, and repair of its facilities utilizing methods and devices commonly accepted in the sanitary sewer industry to prevent failures and accidents that are likely to cause damage, injury, or nuisance to persons or property. 4.7.2. District will make all reasonable effort to construct and maintain its facilities in the right-of-way in a safe and operational condition. 4.8. Dangerous Conditions, Authority for City to Abate. 4.8.1 Whenever Facilities or the operations of District cause or contribute to a condition that appears to endanger any person or substantially impair the lateral support of the adjoining right-of-way, public or private property, the City may direct District, at no charge or expense to the City, to take actions to resolve the condition or remove the endangerment. Such directive may include compliance within a prescribed time period. 4.8.2 In the event District fails or refuses to promptly take the action, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action to prevent imminent injury or damage to persons or property, the City may take such action as it {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 - Packet Pg. 324 7.1.a believes necessary and District shall reimburse the City for its actual costs incurred. Section 5. Relocation of System Facilities. 5.1 Whenever the City causes the grading or widening of the right-of-way or undertakes construction of any water or storm drainage line, lighting, signalization, sidewalk improvement, pedestrian amenities, or other public street improvement (for purposes other than those described in Section 5.3 below) and such project requires the relocation of District's then existing Facilities lying within that portion of the right-of-way, or an area affected by such city projects, the City shall: (1) Provide District, at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the commencement of such project, written notice that a project is expected which will or may require relocation of a portion of District's facilities; and (2) Provide District at least sixty (60) days prior to the commencement of such project, with reasonable plans and specifications for such grading, widening, or construction and a proposed new location within or adjacent to the right-of-way for District's Facilities. 5.2. After receipt of such notice and the plans and specifications, District shall relocate such Facilities within the right-of-way as to accommodate such street and utility improvement project ten (10) days prior to commencement of the project unless there is agreement to a different schedule for coordinating completion of relocation of Facilities, provided, however, District may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its Facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocations of its Facilities and the time schedule. The City shall within a reasonable time evaluate such alternatives and advise the District in writing whether one or more of the alternatives is suitable to accommodate work that would otherwise necessitate relocation of the Facilities. If so requested by the City, District shall submit such additional information as is reasonably necessary to assist the City in making such evaluation. The City shall give each alternative full and fair consideration. In the event the City ultimately reasonably {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 8 - Packet Pg. 325 7.1.a determines that there is no other reasonable or feasible alternative, then District shall relocate its Facilities as otherwise provided in this Section 5. The City shall cooperate with District to designate a substitute location for its Facilities within the right-of-way. The cost of relocating such Facilities existing within the present limits of the City shall be paid as follows: (1) if the relocation occurs within five (5) years after District initially constructed such Facility, then the relocation shall be at the City's sole cost; (2) if the relocation occurs more than five (5) years after District initially constructed such Facility, then the relocation shall be at District's sole cost. 5.3 Obligations under this Section 5 shall not apply whenever any person or entity, other than the City, requires the relocation of District Facilities to accommodate the work of such person or entity within the Right -of way, or whenever the relocation of District's Facilities within the right-of-way is necessary to satisfy any requirement or condition of a City permit or approval issued on a land use action (including, without limitation, any condition or requirement imposed pursuant to any contract or in conjunction with approvals or permits for zoning, land use, construction or development) for the benefit of any person or entity other than the City. However, in the event the City reasonably determines (and promptly notifies District in writing of such determination) that the primary purpose of imposing such condition or requirement upon such person or entity which necessitates such relocation is to cause the construction of an improvement on the City's behalf and in a manner consistent with City approved improvement plans (as described in subsection 5.1 above) within a segment of the right-of-way then District shall require only those costs and expenses incurred by District in integrating and connecting such relocated Facilities with District's other Facilities to be paid to District by such person or entity, and District shall otherwise relocate its Facilities within such segment of the right-of-way in accordance with the provisions of subsection 5.1 above. The provisions of this Section 5.3 shall in no manner preclude or restrict District from making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 - Packet Pg. 326 7.1.a relocation of its Facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the facilities to be constructed by such person or entity are not or will not become City owned, operated or maintained facilities, provided that such arrangements do not unduly delay a City construction project. 5.4 Any cost or expense in connection with the location or relocation of any Facilities existing under benefit of easement or other rights not arising under this Franchise, shall be borne fifty percent (50%) by the City, and fifty percent (50%) by District. Section 6. Compliance with Codes and Regulations. 6.1 The rights, privileges and authority herein granted are subject to and governed by this ordinance and all other applicable ordinances and codes of the City of Edmonds, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. Nothing in this ordinance limits the City's lawful power to exercise its police power to protect the safety and welfare of the general public. Any location, relocation, erection or excavation by District shall be performed by District in accordance with applicable federal, state and city rules and regulations, including the City Public Works Policies and Pre -approved Plans, and any required permits, licenses or fees, and applicable safety standards then in effect or any Memorandum of Understanding with District. 6.2 Upon written inquiry, District shall provide a specific reference to either the federal, state or local law or the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) order or action establishing a basis for District's actions related to a specific franchise issue. 6.3 In the event that any territory served by District is annexed to the City after the effective date of this Franchise, such territory shall be governed by the terms and conditions contained herein upon the effective date of such annexation. Section 7. System Development Information. 7.1 District will assign a representative whose responsibility shall be to coordinate with the City on planning for CIP {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 10 - Packet Pg. 327 7.1.a projects including those that involve under grounding. At a minimum, such coordination shall include the following: (1) District shall meet with the City, other franchisees and users of the right-of-way, according to a schedule to be determined by the City, to schedule and coordinate construction; and (2) All construction locations, activities, and schedules shall be coordinated, as required by the Mayor or his designee, to minimize public inconvenience, disruption, or damages. (3) For the purpose of planning, District and the City shall provide each other with a copy of their respective current adopted Capital Improvement Plan annually and upon request by the other party. Section 8. Planning Coordination. The parties agree, as follows, to participate in the development of, and reasonable updates, to each other's planning documents. 8.1 For District's service within the City Urban Growth Area limits, District will participate in a cooperative effort with the City of Edmonds to develop a Comprehensive Plan - Utilities Element, that meets the requirements described in RCW 36.70A.070 (4). 8.2 District will participate in a cooperative effort with the City to ensure that the Utilities Element of the City's Comprehensive plan is accurate as it relates to District's operations and is updated to ensure it's continued relevance at reasonable intervals. 8.3 District shall submit information related to the general location, proposed location, and approximate capacity of all existing and proposed Facilities within the City as requested by the Director within a reasonable time, not exceeding sixty (60) days from receipt of a written request for such information. 8.4 District will update information provided to the City whenever there are major changes in the District's system plans for the City. {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I I - Packet Pg. 328 7.1.a 8.5 District will provide information relevant to its operation within the City within a reasonable period of time after a written request to assist the City in it's need to develop and update it's Comprehensive Plan - Utilities Element, provided that such information is in District's possession or can be reasonably developed from information in District's possession. 8.6 The City will provide information relevant to District's operations within a reasonable period of time following a written request to assist District in the development or update of its Comprehensive Sewage System Plan, provided that such information is in the City's possession, or can be reasonably developed from the information in the City's possession. Section 9. Indemnification by District and Edmonds. 9.1 District hereby releases, covenants not to bring suit, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, costs, judgments, awards, attorney's fees, or liability to any person, including claims by District's own employees to which District might otherwise be immune under Title 51 RCW, arising from personal injury or damage to property allegedly due to the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of District, its agents, servants, officers or employees in performing activities authorized by this Franchise. This covenant of indemnification shall include, but not be limited by this reference, claims against the City arising as a result of the acts or omissions of District, its agents, servants, officers or employees except for claims for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. If final judgment is rendered against the City, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, or any of them, District shall satisfy the same. The City may appear in any proceeding it deems necessary to protect the City's or the public's interests. 9.2 The City hereby releases, covenants not to bring suit, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, costs, judgments, awards, attorney's fees, or liability to any person, including claims by City's own employees to which City might otherwise be immune {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 - Packet Pg. 329 7.1.a under Title 51 RCW, arising from personal injury or damage to property allegedly due to the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of City, its agents, servants, officers or employees in performing construction, maintenance or other city activities within the Rights -of - way. This covenant of indemnification shall include, but not be limited by this reference, claims against the District arising as a result of the acts or omissions of City, its agents, servants, officers or employees except for claims for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the District. If final judgment is rendered against the District, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, or any of them, City shall satisfy the same. The District may appear in any proceeding it deems necessary to protect the District's interests or the interests of its ratepayers. 9.3 In the event any such claim or demand be presented to or filed with either party, such party shall promptly notify the other thereof, which party shall have the right, at its election and at its sole cost and expense, to settle and compromise such claim or demand. In the event any suit or action be begun against either party based upon any such claim or demand, such party shall likewise promptly notify the other party thereof, which party shall have the right, at its election and its sole cost and expense, to settle and compromise such suit or action, or defend the same at its sole cost and expense, by attorneys of its own election. 9.4 Inspection or acceptance by one party of any work performed by the other at the time of completion of construction shall not be grounds for avoidance of any of these covenants of indemnification. Said indemnification obligations shall extend to claims that are not reduced to a suit and any claims that may be settled prior to the culmination of any litigation or the institution of any litigation. 9.5. In the event either refuses to undertake the defense of any suit or any claim, after a request for defense and indemnification has been made pursuant to the indemnification clauses contained herein, and such refusal is subsequently determined by a court having jurisdiction (or such other tribunal that the parties shall agree to decide the matter), to have been a wrongful refusal, such party shall pay all of the other parry's costs and expenses for {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 - Packet Pg. 330 7.1.a defense of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees or recovering under this indemnification clause as well as any judgment against the party. 9.6. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Franchise is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of District and the City, its officers, employees and agents, each party's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of its negligence. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. Section 10. Insurance. 10.1. District shall procure and maintain in full force for the duration of the Franchise, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the exercise of the rights, privileges and authority granted hereunder to District, its agents or employees. 10.2 In satisfying the insurance requirement set forth in this section, District may self -insure against such risks in such amounts as are consistent with good utility practice. District shall provide the City with sufficient written evidence, the sufficiency of which shall be determined at the reasonable discretion of the City, upon request, that such insurance (or self-insurance) is being so maintained by District. Such written evidence shall include, to the extent available from District's insurance carrier, a written certificate of insurance with respect to any insurance maintained by District in compliance with this Section. 10.3 Commercial General Liability insurance policy, written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include premises, operations, independent contractors, products -completed operations, personal injury and advertising injury. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance excluding liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an additional insured under District's Commercial General Liability insurance policy. {wss572714.Doc;l/oo006.900000/) - 14 - Packet Pg. 331 7.1.a 10.4 Excess Liability in an amount of $5,000,000 each occurrence and $20,000.00 aggregate limit. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Excess Liability insurance policy. 10.5 Automobile Liability insurance for owned, non -owned and hired vehicles with limits no less than $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage 10.6 Payment of deductible or self -insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of District. 10.7 District shall require all its subcontractors to carry insurance consistent with this Section 10.3, and shall provide evidence of such insurance to the City upon request. 10.8 The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, or employees. In addition, the insurance policy shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. District's insurance shall be primary. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of District's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either parry, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City. Section 11. Default / Enforcement. 11.1 The City reserves the right to revoke and terminate this Franchise and all rights and privileges of District in the event of a substantial violation or material breach of its terms and conditions. 11.2 A substantial violation or material breach by District shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: (1) An uncured violation of any material provision of this Franchise, or any material rule, order or {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 15 - Packet Pg. 332 7.1.a regulation of the City which would endanger the public health, safety and welfare; (2) The practice of any fraud or deceit upon the ratepayers served by the District's water and sanitary sewer system. (3) The practice of any fraud or deceit upon the City. (4) Misrepresentation of material facts in the negotiation of this Franchise or its implementation. (5) An uncured failure to pay the fee associated with this Franchise. 11.3 No violation or breach of this Franchise shall occur which is without fault of either District or the City, unless they are the result of circumstances beyond District's or the City's reasonable control, such as Acts of God or unrelated third parties. Neither District, nor the City, shall be excused by economic hardship or by nonfeasance or malfeasance of its elected officials, officers, agents or employees. Damage to equipment causing service interruption shall be deemed to be the result of circumstances beyond District's or the City's control if it is caused by any negligent act or unintended omission of its employees (assuming proper training) or agents (assuming reasonable diligence in their selection), or sabotage, vandalism or malicious mischief by its employees or agents. District, or the City, shall bear the burden of proof in establishing the existence of such conditions. 11.4 Except in the case of termination of this Franchise pursuant to Paragraph 11.2d, the City, or District, prior to any termination or revocation of this Franchise, shall provide the other with detailed written notice describing any substantial violation or material breach upon which it proposes to take action. The party who is allegedly in breach shall have a period of 60 days following such written notice to cure the alleged violation or breach, or demonstrate to the other's satisfaction that a violation or breach has not occurred or does not exist, or submit a plan that is satisfactory to the other to correct the violation or {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 16 - Packet Pg. 333 7.1.a breach. If, at the end of said 60-day period, the party giving such notice reasonably believes that a substantial violation or material breach is continuing and that the party in breach is not taking satisfactory corrective action, the noticing party may, by written notice to the other party, declare that the party in breach is in default. Within 20 days after receipt of a written declaration of default, the party that is alleged to be in default may request, in writing, a hearing before the City Hearing Examiner, as provided by the City's development regulations. The Hearing Examiner's decision may be appealed by either party to the Snohomish County Superior Court within thirty (30) days following the date of the decision rendered. 11.5 The City may, in its discretion and without waiving its rights under Paragraph 11.4 above, provide, in writing, for an extension of the period for District to remedy any violation or breach of the Franchise terms or take such corrective action specified in the Notice and come into compliance with its obligations under this Franchise, so as to avoid its termination or revocation. 11.6 Any violation continuing for a period greater than 60 days may be remedied by the City at District's expense, unless District is diligently and in good faith proceeding with corrective action and its failure to complete corrective action is caused by unavoidable delays or events beyond its control. Section 12. Franchise Term. The term of the Franchise granted hereunder shall remain in full force for an initial term of ten (10) years from the effective date. It may be renewed for additional term(s) commensurate with the interlocal agreement between the parties Section 13. Non -Exclusive Franchise. This Franchise is not and shall not be deemed to be an exclusive Franchise. This Franchise shall not in any manner prohibit the City from granting other and further franchises under, over, upon, and along the right-of-way which do not interfere with District's existing water and sanitary sewer system and its rights under this {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 17 - Packet Pg. 334 7.1.a Franchise. This Franchise shall not prohibit or prevent the City from using the right-of-way or affect the jurisdiction of the City over the same or any part thereof. Section 14. Franchise Fee. 14.1. In consideration for the rights granted District under this agreement and the parties concomitant Interlocal Operating Agreement to occupy City right-of-way for the purpose of operating a water and sanitary sewer utility within the City dated June 28, 2004 and as compensation for the City's recovery of actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to receiving and approving permits, licenses, cost of inspections, this franchise and inspecting plans for construction within the right-of-way, District agrees to pay the City a franchise fee of $10 annually in addition to those fees identified in Right -of - Way Management, Section 4. If the interlocal agreement is terminated by either party or by judicial action, the District shall pay an annual fee of the lesser of $3,000 or the lowest fee charged to any other public utility franchised by the City, whichever is less. Proceeds of the franchise fee collected shall be distributed to the City no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year. 14.2 The fees and charges set forth in this ordinance are in addition to, and not in limitation of, the payments established by agreement in an interlocal agreement between the parties. Section 15. Records. As a condition of this Franchise, and without charge to the City, District agrees to provide the City with available as -built plans, maps, and records that show the vertical and horizontal location of its facilities within the right-of-way. This information shall be provided between one hundred twenty (120) and one hundred eighty (180) days of the effective date of this Ordinance and shall be updated upon reasonable request by the City. Section 16. Survival. All of the provisions, conditions and requirements of Sections 4.1 Excavation, 4.2 Abandonment Of District's Facilities, 4.3 Restoration After {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 18 - Packet Pg. 335 7.1.a Construction, 4.8 Dangerous Conditions, Authority For City To Abate, Section 5 Relocation of System Facilities, and Section 9 Indemnification, of this Franchise, shall be in addition to any and all other obligations and liabilities District may have to the City at common law, by statute, or by contract, and shall survive the City's Franchise to District for the use of the areas mentioned in Section 2.3 herein, and any renewals or extensions thereof. This Ordinance shall further be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of District and all privileges, as well as all obligations and liabilities of District shall inure to its heirs, successors and assigns equally as if they were specifically mentioned wherever District is named herein. Section 17. Severability. If any Section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other Section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Franchise Ordinance. The Parties may amend, repeal, add, replace, or modify any provision of this Franchise to preserve the intent of the parties as expressed herein prior to any finding of invalidity or unconstitutionality. Section 18. Assignment. This Franchise shall not be sold, transferred, assigned, or disposed of in whole or in part either by sale, voluntary or involuntary merger, consolidation or otherwise, without the written approval of the City. This paragraph shall not act to require City approval of any District action to mortgage or otherwise encumber its facilities, or other action related to corporate financing, financial reorganization, or refinancing activity. Section 19. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given to the parties under this Franchise may be sent to the following addresses unless otherwise specified: {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 19 - Packet Pg. 336 7.1.a District General Manager Olympic View Water & Sewer District 23725 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98026-1856 Phone: 425-774-7769 Fax: Administrative Services Director City of Edmonds 121— 5th Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: 425-771-0240 Fax: 425-771-0265 Section 20. Non -Waiver. The failure of either party to enforce any breach or violation by the other party of any provision of this Franchise shall not be deemed to be a waiver or a continuing waiver by the non -breaching party of any subsequent breach or violation of the same or any other provision of this Franchise. Section 21. Alternate Dispute Resolution. If the parties are unable to resolve disputes arising from the terms of this Franchise, prior to resorting to a court of competent jurisdiction, the parties shall submit the dispute to a non -binding alternate dispute resolution process agreed to by the parties. Unless otherwise agreed between the parties or determined herein, the cost of that process shall be shared equally. Section 22. Entire Agreement. This Franchise constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or understandings, written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the parties upon execution and acceptance hereof. Section 23. Directions to Ci . Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward certified copies of this ordinance to District as set forth in this ordinance {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 20 - Packet Pg. 337 7.1.a District shall have sixty (60) days from receipt of the certified copy of this ordinance to accept in writing the terms of the Franchise granted to District by this ordinance. Section 24. District Acceptance of Franchise. District shall have no rights under this Franchise nor shall District be bound by the terms and conditions of this Franchise unless District shall, within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the ordinance, file with the City its written acceptance of this Franchise, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Section 25. Publication Costs. In accord with state law, this ordinance shall be published in full. Section 26. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 06/11/2004 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 06/22/2004 PUBLISHED: 06/27/2004 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/02/2004 ORDINANCE NO. 3506 {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 21 - Packet Pg. 338 7.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.3506 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 22nd day of June, 2004, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 3506. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, GRANTING OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, REPLACE AND REPAIR A WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 23rd day of June, 2004. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 22 - Packet Pg. 339 7.1.a I INTERLQCAL AGREEMENT 2 CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF LYNNWOOD 3 For Emergency Watermain Interties 4 5 6 THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the 7 City of Edmonds, Washington ("Edmonds") and the City of Lynnwood, Washington 8 ("Lynnwood") (collectively, the "Parties"). 9 10 WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes two or more political subdivisions or units 11 of local government of the State of Washington to cooperate on a basis of mutual advantage to 12 provide for services and facilities; and 13 14 WHEREAS, Edmonds and Lynnwood are each authorized to provide water service, and 15 each currently provides water service to persons and properties located within its respective 16 water service area; and 17 18 WHEREAS, Edmonds' and Lynnwood's water service boundaries are located adjacent to 19 each other; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Parties desired to obtain supplemental water supply for emergency 22 purposes through interties between their respective water systems, subject to certain terms and 23 conditions; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the Parties have constructed four emergency watermain interties at places 26 along their respective water service boundaries; and 27 28 WHEREAS, Edmonds is undertaking the construction of a fifth emergency watermain 29 intertie along those boundaries; and 30 31 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of defining 32 their respective rights, obligations, and liabilities regarding these emergency watermain interties; 33 and 34 35 WHEREAS, the City Councils of the City of Edmonds and the City of Lynnwood have 36 taken appropriate action to approve each Party's entry into this Agreement; 37 38 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants contained 39 herein, Edmonds and Lynnwood agree as follows: 40 41 TERMS 42 43 Section 1. P ose. The purpose of this Agreement is to allocate and define the Parties' 44 respective rights, obligations, and liabilities concerning the establishment, ownership, operation, 45 use and maintenance of the one new and four existing emergency watermain interties. The Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 340 7.1.a I terms, conditions and covenants of this Agreement shall accordingly be interpreted to advance 2 this purpose. 3 4 Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by both of the 5 Parties hereto, as indicated by the dates written below. Unless terminated in accordance with 6 Section 3, this Agreement shall remain in effect in perpetuity. 7 8 Section 3. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement with or without 9 cause by providing the other Party with thirty (30) calendar days' written notice of its intent to 10 terminate. Termination shall not alter the Parties' obligations under Section 4 with respect to 11 obligations already performed by the other Party, and shall not alter the Parties' respective 12 obligations under Section 8 of this Agreement. 13 14 Section 4. Obligations. 15 16 A. Edmonds and Lynnwood agree to provide each other with an emergency standby 17 source of water through intertie connections between the Parties' water systems at the 18 rive locations described and depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated 19 herein. by this reference. 20 21 B. Each intertie shall consist of water main, and two normally -closed valves, as depicted 22 on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The new, 23 fifth, intertie shall be constructed by Edmonds at its sole expense, at the location 24 described and depicted on Exhibit A. 25 26 C. To the extent necessary, each Party shall transfer ownership of any portion of an 27 intertie, including the water main and valves, that is located within the other Party's 28 water service area boundaries by a bill of sale at no cost to the other Party. Each 29 Party shall accept the transferred intertie facilities, if any, in an "as -is" condition. 30 Each Party shall then own, operate, repair, replace and maintain in good working 31 condition and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations that portion of 32 each intertie located within its respective water service area boundaries. 33 34 D. Each intertie shall be used only in the event of an emergency as defined in Section 35 4.E, or when otherwise required due to a planned, temporary disruption of water 36 service resulting from construction or maintenance impacting the requesting Party's 37 water system or water supply. 38 39 E. For purposes of this Agreement, an emergency shall be any event that requires either 40 Party's water supply to be augmented on a temporary, unplanned basis, including but 41 not limited to a water shortage, a major water line break, fire demand, contamination 42 of water supply, mechanical or electrical equipment failure, or power supply failure. 43 Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by. the Parties, the maximum duration of an 44 emergency shall be seven calendar (7) days. 45 Interlocat Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 341 7.1.a I F. In case of water supply required for emergency use, Edmonds and Lynnwood shall 2 provide water immediately upon oral notification of such emergency by the other 3 Party. Follow-up written notice of such emergency request shall be made by the 4 requesting Party to the supplying Party within fourteen (14) business days of the oral 5 notification. In the event that the requesting Party anticipates that the emergency will 6 require use of the intertie for more than seven calendar (7) days, the requesting Party 7 shall provide an estimate of the duration of the emergency and request that the S supplying Party agree in writing to the requesting Party's use of the intertie for this 9 duration. 10 11 G. In case of water supply required for a planned, temporary disruption of service, the 12 requesting Party shall notify the supplying Party in writing at Ieast five (5) business 13 days in advance of the dates on which the requesting Party desires to receive water 14 through an intertie. The request shall include the startup time and the estimated 15 duration of intertie service, and shall state the reason for the service disruption 16 requiring use of the intertie. 17 18 H. When activating intertie service, each Party shall operate their respective system 19 components only, and shall provide adequate flushing of the system prior to 20 activating the intertie. 21 22 I. The Parties shall make reasonable efforts to provide an uninterrupted supply of water 23 during any period that an intertie is activated; provided, that neither Party shall be 24 liable for any shortage of or interruption in the delivery of water through an intertie. 25 In addition, neither Party shall be liable for any failure, interruption in or shortage of 26 water, or any loss or damage resulting therefrom occasioned by any cause beyond the 27 control of either Party. Neither Party guarantees the availability of water through any 28 intertie at all times because of each Party's respective needs and water demand. 29 Further, during critical water shortage periods as determined by a supplying Party, the 30 supplying Party, in that Party's sole discretion, may deny use of any intertie until 31 sufficient water supply exists to make such available for use by the requesting Party. 32 33 J. The quality of water delivered by either Party through any intertie shall comply with 34 all applicable federal, state and local Iaws and regulations, and shall be of the same 35 quality as that delivered by the supplying Party to that Party's other customers. Upon 36 request of either Party, the other Party shall provide information regarding the current 37 quality of water provided through any intertie, so that blending, compatibility, and 38 other water quality issues may be addressed. 39 40 Section 5. Billing for Water Used. 41 42 A. A written estimate of the quantity of water used shall be reported by the receiving 43 Party to the supplying Party within three (3) business days after the termination of 44 any intertie use. The estimate of water used shall be agreed upon by both parties and 45 shalI include a detailed explanation as to how the estimate was derived. If the intertie 46 use continues for more than thirty (30) calendar days, the written estimate of water Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 342 7.1.a I use shall be provided on the first day of the following month. If unmetered use of 2 water is expected to exceed thirty (30) calendar days, the recipient agency shall install 3 a meter within thirty (30) days of activation of the unmetered intertie. 4 5 B. In the event that Edmonds or Lynnwood receives water through any intertie, both 6 Parties agree to pay the other Party for such water delivered at the wholesale rate plus 7 ten percent (10%). The wholesale rate per CCF shall be determined based on the 8 preceding complete calendar year, by dividing the total annual volume of water (in 9 CCF) delivered to Edmonds' or Lynnwood's end users within their respective water 10 service boundaries, into the total annual costs of potable water purchased from the 11 wholesale supplier(s) during the same calendar year. The Party delivering such water 12 shall bill the Party receiving such water monthly for the amount of water delivered. 13 The Party receiving such water shall pay the supplying Party within forty-five (45) 14 calendar days of the date of such billing. Any billings not paid by the receiving Party 15 within such 45-day period shall accrue interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per 16 annum until paid. 17 18 Section 6. Ownership of ,Property. Neither Party shall by virtue of this Agreement 19 acquire any proprietary or governmental interest in the water system of the other Party. Each 20 Party shall be solely responsible 'for the operation and maintenance of its own system of water .21 distribution. 22 23 Section 7. Administration- No Separate Entity Created. This Agreement shall be 24 administered jointly by the Edmonds City Engineer and the Lynnwood City Engineer. No 25 separate legal entity is formed by this Agreement. 26 27 Section 8. Release Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement. Each Party to this 28 Agreement shall be responsible for its own negligent and/or wrongful acts or omissions, and 29 those of its own officers, agents, employees, representatives, contractors or subcontractors, to the 30 fullest extent required by the laws of the State of Washington. Each Party agrees to protect, 31 indemnify and save the other Party harmless from and against any and all such liability for injury 32 or damage to the other Party or the other Party's property, and also from and against all claims, 33 demands and causes of action of every kind and character arising directly or indirectly, or in any 34 way incident to, in connection with, or arising out of the performance of this Agreement, caused 35 by its own negligence or wrongful acts or omissions, or that of its officers, agents, employees, 36 representatives, contractors or subcontractors; provided, that the indemnifying Party's obligation 37 to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other Party for claims caused by or resulting from 38 the concurrent negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the indemnifying Party shall apply 39 only to the extent of the negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the indemnifying Party. 40 41 Section 9. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of 42 the State of Washington. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in 43 Snohomish County Superior Court. 44 45 Section 10. No Employment Relationship Created. The Parties agree that nothing in this 46 Agreement shall be construed to create an employment relationship between Edmonds and any Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 343 7.1.a I employee, agent, representative or contractor of Lynnwood, or between Lynnwood and any 2 employee, agent, representative or contractor of Edmonds. 3 4 Section 11. No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is intended fox the sole and 5 exclusive benefit of the Parties bereto and no third Party rights are created by this Agreement. 6 7 Section 12. Notices. Notices to Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: 8 9 City of Edmonds 10 Public Works Director 11 7110210a'StSW 12 Edmonds, WA 98026 13 14 Notices to Lynnwood shall be sent to the following address: 15 16 Cityof L 1Lynnwood 7 City Engineer 18 P.O. Box 5008 19 Lynnwood, WA 98046 20 21 22 Section 13. Duty to File Agreement with County Auditor. Edmonds shall, after this 23 Agreement is executed by both Parties, file this Agreement with the Snohomish County Auditor. 24 25 Section 14. Integration/Amendment. This document constitutes the entire embodiment 26 of the agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes and 27 replaces all prior agreeements, both written and oral. This Agreement may only be modified or 28 amended by an agreement in writing signed by both Parties hereto. 29 30 Section 15. Non -Waiver. Waiver by any Party of any of the provisions contained within 31 this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision. 32 33 Section 16. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the 34 benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 35 36 37 CITY ED 38 39 By: 40 Dav Earling, Mayor 41 42 Date: ~' 43 44 45 ATTEST: 46 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 344 7.1.a 1 2 Scott Passe y, City C1 3 4 5 CED AS TO 8 Office of the City Attorney 9 10 11 12 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 13 1eNicola By:U&�6--L 'mith, Mayor 17 Date:'i�-- 18 19 20 ATTEST: 21 22 23 Art Ceniza, City Clerk 24 25 26 LAROVED AS TO FORM: 27 28 29 Office of City Attorney Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 345 7.1.a ft >§ 7 }{ \|2 {» ƒ § /Oi z z z z z k § z z z z z %) «»°§ �| {a; )}%) ! /§(\;; - f§ � "^` 4Qk§§G . |]%® !.=c ƒ) ±;(` ) .a 3 E,A� 5 . f _ e ) 0 ƒ \\ ) a § ©_ { (k ) z z ))\\\ { \ \ . k z z z ƒ \ t0 o 16 /\I -S� !$:a:15 - ):E76 e )\ C> §; mZ« § ^ 4 a g 2 2 4 C) z } Packet Pg. 346 7.1.a EMERGENCY INTERTIE AGREEMENT BETWEEEN SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CITY OF EDMONDS This Agreement is made and entered into this_L day of December, 2011, by and between the City of Seattle, a Washington municipal corporation, acting through its Seattle Public Utilities ("SPU") and City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation ("Water Utility"). WHEREAS, SPU and Water Utility each own and operate public water supply systems ("Water System") within their respective service areas in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, Water Utility has requested that SPU provide it with an emergency back-up water supply through an existing intertie connection between SPU's and Water Utility's Water Systems, which will increase reliability for operating Water Utility's Water System during temporary periods when its Water System is impaired or disrupted; and WHEREAS, SPU agrees to use its best efforts to provide Water Utility an emergency back-up water supply under certain terms and conditions from its available existing sources of water supply. NOW THEREFORE, both parties agree as follows: 1. TERM: The initial term of this Agreement shall be for fifty (50) years commencing on January 1, 2012 and expiring on December 31, 2061. 2. DESCRIPTION OF EMERGENCY INTERTIE: SPU will deliver water to Water Utility through service connection(s), which include the water meter and appurtenances ("Emergency Intertie"), as described below and as more particularly described, including the location(s ) and specific operating conditions, in Exhibit I, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein. Exhibit I may be revised in writing upon mutual agreement of the Director of SPU and the City of Edmonds Director of Public Works, except that SPU may modify the minimum hydraulic gradient once during any fifteen (15) year period upon four (4) �7Z Packet Pg. 347 7.1.a years' advance written notice, unless a shorter notice is agreed to by Water Utility. SPU Facilities include: the outlet from the supply pipeline, the pipeline from the outlet to the meter vault, and the meter vault and its contents. Water Utility Facilities include: everything past the external wall of the meter vault. SPU will provide water for use at the Emergency Intertie at any time except as otherwise allowed by the terms of this Agreement. 3. USE OF EMERGENCY INTERTIE: Water Utility's use of the Emergency Intertie is limited to temporary, emergency backup water supply for up to one week, unless SPU approves a longer period in writing, which will not be unreasonably withheld. The parties agree that in the event a substantially longer period is approved, the Director of SPU may require additional reasonable terms and conditions that will be in effect during the approved longer period. For the purposes of this Agreement, an emergency means an unforeseen event that causes damage or disrupts Water Utility's normal operations of its Water System or requires immediate action to protect public health and safety, which includes fire flow purposes. 4. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF EMERGENCY INTERTIE: a. The Emergency Intertie may not be used to respond to routine or seasonal peak demands or water shortages. b. Before using the Emergency Intertie, Water Utility shall use best efforts to activate its own emergency sources of supply or alternative operations to cope with the emergency. c. SPU will provide water at the point of delivery in accordance with this Agreement during use of the Emergency Intertie as defined in Exhibit I, as revised from time to time. d. Water Utility will endeavor to not exceed flows defined in Exhibit I during use of the Emergency Intertie without specific written authorization by SPU. e. Water Utility may use up to the number of gallons of water per year through the Emergency Intertie identified in Exhibit 1 for administrative purposes only, such as hydrant or valve exercising/testing, flushing or other measures taken to maintain water quality, which is included as part of the Annual Fee ("Administrative Allowance"). The Director of SPU and the City of Edmonds Director of Public Works may revise the Administrative Allowance in Exhibit I as necessary, upon mutual written agreement between the Director of SPU and President of Water Utility. Packet Pg. 348 7.1.a f. Water Utility agrees and acknowledges that in the event of a general emergency or weather -related water shortage affecting SPU's Water System, SPU may interrupt or reduce its deliveries of water to its wholesale customers (except for fire protection), including Water Utility under this Agreement. g. Water Utility agrees and acknowledges that in the event of a general emergency or weather -related water shortage affecting SPU's Water System or the region, SPU may implement emergency water use curtailment measures that impact Water Utility's retail customers' use of water in accordance with its Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other necessary action. Water Utility will assist and support any emergency curtailment measures that are implemented and related to use of the Emergency Intertie. h. Water Utility agrees and acknowledges that SPU may temporarily interrupt use or reduce availability of water through the Emergency Intertie if SPU determines that the interruption or reduction is necessary or reasonable in case of a localized or SPU Water System emergency or in order to perform any required maintenance, improvement, repair, inspection or testing of SPU's Water System. Except in cases of emergency affecting SPU's Water System, SPU will provide Water Utility reasonable notice of any temporary interruptions or reductions and will endeavor to minimize interruptions and reductions of water available through the Emergency Intertie, especially when the Emergency Intertie is in active use by Water Utility. In the case of emergency, SPU will provide Water Utility notice as soon as practicable. 5. NOTIFICATION: Whenever general notice is required or prudent under this Agreement, notice shall be giving to the following representatives, which may be amended in writing: SPU: Wholesale Contracts Manager PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 206-733-9815 Email: terri.greea@seattle.eov Water Utility: Public Works Director 7110 210th SW Edmonds, WA 98026 425-771-0235 Email: phil.williams@ci.edmonds.wa.us a. Water Utility will verbally notify SPU Operations Control Center at 206-386-1818 whenever the Emergency Intertie is used for emergency use. Water Utility will endeavor 3 Packet Pg. 349 7.1.a to notify SPU within 1 hour after the use of the Emergency Intertie begins, or as soon as practicable, and will state the nature of the emergency and estimated/actual duration. b. Water Utility will send written notice to SPU Wholesale Contracts Manager at the address above within 10 days after each use of the Emergency Intertie, in a form acceptable to SPU, stating the duration and estimated quantity of water use. 6. WATER QUALITY: SPU will provide water to the point of delivery that meets all state and federal drinking water standards and shall be of the same standard and quality as that normally delivered by SPU to its retail and wholesale customers. Water Utility acknowledges and agrees that because the Emergency Intertie is used intermittently, it may result in water being stagnant at the point of delivery for periods of time that may affect water quality. Water Utility is solely responsible for implementing operational best practices, such as flushing the service connection, prior to use of the Emergency Intertie for potable or other use. Water Utility is solely responsible for compliance with all applicable local, state and federal drinking water quality laws and regulations within its Water System. 7. INTERTIE MAINTENANCE: Each utility shall be responsible for maintenance of their portion of the Emergency Intertie as described in Section 2 of this Agreement as SPU and Water Utility Facilities respectively. 8. METER EQUIPMENT: SPU shall own, maintain and pay the cost of the metering equipment for the Emergency Intertie, including periodic inspection and testing. If Seattle changes the location of the intertie connection to Water Utility for Seattle's benefit, then Seattle shall pay the cost of constructing a new wholesale meter installation at the new location. If Water Utility requests the change in location, then Water Utility shall pay the cost of the new connection. 9. EMERGENCY INTERTIE FEES: Water Utility will pay the following charges within 30 days of an invoice from SPU: a. An Annual Fee, paid in advance by January 1 of each calendar year, which covers SPU's expenses to administer this Agreement and the Administrative Allowance for Water Utility under Section 4.e and Exhibit 1 of this Agreement. The Director of SPU may revise the Annual Fee reasonably to account for any change in the Administrative Allowance mutually agreed under Section 4.e above. Each year during the term of this Agreement, the Director of SPU may revise the Annual Fee by the same percentage as the change in the average of the Peak and Off -Peak Commodity Charge Rates from the 4 Packet Pg. 350 7.1.a prior year to the current year then in effect for wholesale customers under Seattle Municipal Code Section 21.04.440.E.2, as it may be amended from time to time. The initial Annual Fee due January 1, 2012 is $4214. SPU will provide 30 days' written notice of any subsequent revisions to the Annual Fee, which will become incorporated herein by this reference at the time the revised Annual Fee becomes effective. b. A Commodity Charge for the metered amount of water used through the Emergency Intertie minus the Administrative Allowance at the then applicable average of the Peak and Off -Peak Commodity Charge Rates in effect for wholesale customers under Seattle Municipal Code Section 21.04.440.E.2, as it may be amended from time to time, plus any emergency surcharge, if applicable generally to the wholesale customers at that time. c. A one-time transaction fee of $1500 is due January 1 2012. d. Any late payment will accrue interest at 1% per month. 10. LIMIT OF LIABILITY: Water Utility understands and agrees that SPU obligations under this Agreement are subject to the limitations herein. SPU shall not be held liable, under any circumstances, for loss or damage from a deficiency or failure to supply water caused by an emergency, unforeseen event, or for any other reason allowed under this Agreement. 11. TERMINATION: Water Utility may terminate this Agreement at any time upon twelve (12) months' written notice to SPU. SPU may terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days' written notice to Water Utility that it has materially breached this Agreement and does not cure the material breach within the 60-day cure period, or a longer time period as SPU may approve in writing if Water Utility is making substantial progress towards curing the material breach. In the event of termination under this provision, Water Utility will be responsible for any reasonable costs SPU incurs to disconnect or remove the service connection as may be required by industry or SPU operating practices then in effect. 12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION: If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to resolve the dispute within 90 days. Unless the parties agree to a longer time, if the dispute remains unresolved after 90 days, the parties agree to try in good faith to settle it by mediation before resorting to arbitration, litigation or some other legal dispute resolution procedure. Venue and jurisdiction shall lie in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington in Seattle. Packet Pg. 351 7.1.a 13. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter. This agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. This agreement will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their successors and assigns. If any of this Agreement or its application is determined by a court of law to be illegal, invalid, or void without rendering performance of this Agreement impossible or infeasible, then the Parties intend that the validity of the remaining provisions of this Agreement or their application shall not be affected and shall continue in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Agreement. THE CITY OF EDMONDSIWATER UTILITY: Earling, ATTEST: Ch e, City Clerk Phil Williams, Public Works Director Approved as to Form ttorney THE CITY OF SEATTLE: BY: Director, Seattle Public Utilities C. Date: Date: Date: l ( Date: Z 5 it Date: I I Packet Pg. 352 7.1.a Z w w J o a a D �oU) vaw w a 9 w.. 09LL 0 =�w ) ?_jtZ LL Z:3O w Z Z �; O ZIQ— V Q OC ZDU) OZ V wo ^ O Z 0CL N LL v W 0 2 v 1JL J � J a Q ..� C p — G Z (L Q. Lu p w E a O �aLL�0 >-zG=,.QOoo CDco =wa 2> LO ZUna Z V a N � W LL a z9 Z W p� Q Z C FW- W a a g O °' Z 0 LLL W ^ N w Z O w Z N Z p Zw Ci m O Lu V N Z ca CO) Z z O ai Q V c� o Ln J E N N LL Z Packet Pg. 353 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 354 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX B Packet Pg. 355 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 356 7.1.a W-Wngl,,, „t f WATER FACILITIES INVENTORY (WFI) FORM Quarter: 1 V*Health Updated: 03/10/2016 Printed: 12/14/2016 ONE FORM PER SYSTEM WFI Printed For: On -Demand a67rr of n, rrrfi,+,; wRr. Submission Reason: Pop/Connect Update RETURN TO: Central Services - WFI, PO Box 47822, Olympia, WA, 98504-7822 1. SYSTEM ID NO. 2. SYSTEM NAME 3. COUNTY 4. GROUP 5. TYPE 22500 U EDMONDS, CITY OF SNOHOMISH A Comm 6. PRIMARY CONTACT NAME & MAILING ADDRESS 7. OWNER NAME & MAILING ADDRESS 8. OWNER NUMBER: 0016£ JIM WAITE [WATER/SEWER MGR] EDMONDS, CITY OF 7110 210TH ST SW JIM WAITE WATER MANAGER EDMONDS, WA 98026-7219 7110 210TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026-7219 STREET ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE STREET ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE ATTN ATTN ADDRESS ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP 9.24 HOUR PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION 10. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION Primary Contact Daytime Phone: (425) 771-0235 Owner Daytime Phone: (425) 771-0235 Primary Contact Mobile/Cell Phone: (425) 870-0617 Owner Mobile/Cell Phone: Primary Contact Evening Phone: (xxx)-xxx-xxxx Owner Evening Phone: (xxx)-xxx-xxxx Fax: (425)744-6057 E-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fax: E-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WAC •i .- 24-hour contact information for emergencies. 11. SATELLITE MANAGEMENT AGENCY - SMA (check only one) X Not applicable (Skip to #12) ❑ Owned and Managed SMA NAME: SMA Number: ❑ Managed Only ❑ Owned Only 12. WATER SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS (mark all that apply) ❑ Agricultural Hospital/Clinic Residential �[ Commercial / Business ❑ Industrial School �[ Day Care Licensed Residential Facility ❑ Temporary Farm Worker �[ Food Service/Food Permit Lodging P[ Other (church, fire station, etc.): ❑ 1,000 or more person event for 2 or more days per year ❑ Recreational / RV Park 13. WATER SYSTEM OWNERSHIP (mark only one) 14. STORAGE CAPACITY (gall< ❑ Association ❑ County ❑ Investor ❑ Special District City / Town ❑ Federal ❑ Private ❑ State 7,500,000 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IZ SOURCE NAME INTERTIE SOURCE CATEGORY USE TREATMENT DEPTH SOURCE LOCATI, O LIST UTILITY'S NAME FOR SOURCE INTERTIE V AND WELL TAG ID NUMBER. SYSTEM ❑ z m ID w W a W z OJ O N Example: WELL #1 XYZ456 NUMBER w u O W w E lL � u• 0: Q O w i y LL J z z m Z IF SOURCE IS PURCHASED OR F w z z? d INTERTIED, w o LL Q �' LL F r F O O z LL a } LIST SELLER'S NAME o Q W z W ? w J z a O Q 0 OF H L U z a o Example: SEATTLE w z LL— cWi z Z w w z F❑ Q = w Q a z x U N Z_ Z_ z_ LL �2 Z OF Z J J J J J J z W N W W W O 0_ 0❑ Q W LL W Q r W W W 0= 0= Q X Z 2 0: Q W O z J F� J 2 ❑ U U Q a. a. a W 7 Q F W W 2 O O 2 J ? W O y fn fn fn fn W O LL N W to Z U LL LL O y F S01 24050L/EVERETT 24050 L X Y X 0 S02 77050Y/SEATTLE 77050 Y X Y X 0 SE SW 31 27N DOH 331-011 (Rev. 06/03) DOH Copy I Packet Pg. 357 7.1.a WATER FACILITIES INVENTORY (WFI) FORM - Continued 1. SYSTEM ID NO. 1 2. SYSTEM NAME 3. COUNTY 4. GROUP 22500 U EDMONDS, CITY OF I SNOHOMISH I A 25. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES (How many of the following do you have?) A. Full Time Single Family Residences (Occupied 180 days or more per year) B. Part Time Single Family Residences (Occupied less than 180 days per year) 26. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (How many of the following do you have?) A. Apartment Buildings, condos, duplexes, barracks, dorms B. Full Time Residential Units in the Apartments, Condos, Duplexes, Dorms that are occupied more than 180 days/year C. Part Time Residential Units in the Apartments, Condos, Duplexes, Dorms that are occupied less than 180 days/year 27. NON-RESIDENTIAL CONNECTIONS (How many of the following do you have?) A. Recreational Services and/or Transient Accommodations (Campsites, RV sites, hotel/motel/overnight units) B. Institutional, Commercial/Business, School, Day Care, Industrial Services, etc. 28. TOTAL SERVICE CONNECTIONS 29. FULL-TIME RESIDENTIAL POPULATION A. How many residents are served by this system 180 or more days per year? 32381 ACTIVE CALCULATED SERVICE ACTIVE iNNECTIONS CONNECTION: 9410 8772 0 0 638 0 0 0 789 789 10199 5. TYPE Comm DOH USE OI APPROVE CONNECTR Unspecifie 30. PART-TIME RESIDENTIAL POPULATION JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DI A. How many part-time residents are present each month? B. How many days per month are they present? 31. TEMPORARY & TRANSIENT USERS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DI A. How many total visitors, attendees, travelers, campers, patients or customers have access to the water system each month? B. How many days per month is water accessible to the public? 32. REGULAR NON-RESIDENTIAL USERS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DI A. If you have schools, daycares, or businesses connected to your water system, how many students daycare children and/or employees are present each month? B. How many days per month are they present? 33. ROUTINE COLIFORM SCHEDULE Requirement is exception from WAC 246-290 JAN 30 FEB 30 ]30 APR 30 MAY 30 JUN 30 JUL 30 AUG 30 SEP 30 OCT 30 NOV 30 DI 34. NITRATE SCHEDULE (One Sample per source by time period) QUARTERLY ANNUALLY ONCE EVERY 3 YEARS 35. Reason for Submitting WFI: ❑ Update - Change ❑ Update - No Change Inactivate [-]Re-Activate ❑ Name Change ❑ New System [-]Other 36. 1 certify that the information stated on this WFI form is correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE: DATE: PRINT NAME: TITLE: DOH 331-011 (Rev. 06/03) DOH Copy I Packet Pg. 358 WS ID WS Name 22500 EDMONDS, CITY OF 7.1.a Total WFI Printed: 1 DOH 331-011 (Rev. 06/03) DOH Copy I Packet Pg. 359 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 360 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX C Packet Pg. 361 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 362 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan Pressure Reducing Station Data 7.1.a Station Number Station Location Control Valve Size (in) Normal Pressure Upper Pressure Zone Lower Pressure Zone Main Bypass Inlet (psi) Outlet (psi) # 2 68th & North Meadowdale Road 4 N/A 72 33 596 500 # 3 72nd & North Meadowdale Road 6 2 132 52 500 325 # 5 7082 Meadowdale Beach Road 6 2.5 130 90 596 500 # 6 74th & Meadowdale Beach Road 6 2 144 63 500 325 # 7 76th Ave W & Braemar Drive (E side of 76th) 6 2 100 52 425 325 # 8 76th Ave W & 176th St SW (NE Corner) 6 2 160 85 596 425 # 9 76th Ave W & 188th (W side of 76th) 8 2 125 50 596 425 # 10 80th Ave & 184th St SW (SW Corner) 8 4 115 82 596 505 # 13 88th Ave W & 185th Place SW 4 1.5 110 60 596 505 # 14 8900 188th St SW 4 1.5 108 55 596 505 # 15 8927 192nd St SW 4 1.5 110 57 596 505 # 16 19822 Maplewood Drive 6 1.5 105 52 596 486 # 17 Main St & Skyline Drive 6 2 102 46 596 486 # 18 Olympic Ave & Bell St 6 2 94 65 486 420 # 20 6th Ave S & Elm Way 8 2 115 48 486 325 # 21 9th Ave S & Pine St (OFF LINE) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A # 23 12th & Viewland 6 2 150 72 596 420 # 24 Olympic View Dr & 76th (Throttle Control Valve) 6 2 135 100 505 425 CD N N N a M d E N rr N U) L i .N i d i L Q E O U ti 0 N r.+ C d E t V M a+ a H:\EVT_Projects\15\1662 Edm WSP\EXCEL\VALVES packet Pg. 363 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 364 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX D Packet Pg. 365 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 366 4F�kingfun StulcIkparfm^af u' A4 Health 7.1.a Local Government Consistency Determination Form Water System Name: City of Edmonds PWS ID: 22500 Planning/Engineering Document Title: Water System Plan Plan Date: Local Government with Jurisdiction Conducting Review: City of Edmonds Before the Department of Health (DOH) approves a planning or engineering submittal under Section 100 or Section 110, the local government must review the documentation the municipal water supplier provides to prove the submittal is consistent with local comprehensive plans, land use plans and development regulations (WAC 246-290-108). Submittals under Section 105 require a local consistency determination if the municipal water supplier requests a water right place -of -use expansion. The review must address the elements identified below as they relate to water service. By signing this form, the local government reviewer confirms the document under review is consistent with applicable local plans and regulations. If the local government reviewer identifies an inconsistency, he or she should include the citation from the applicable comprehensive plan or development regulation and explain how to resolve the inconsistency, or confirm that the inconsistency is not applicable by marking N/A. See more instructions on reverse. For use by water For use by local system government Local Government Consistent Statement y e Identify the page(s) in Yes or submittal Not Applicable a) The water system service area is consistent with the adopted land use Fig. 2-3 & and zoning within the service area. Fig. 3-1 b) The growth projection used to forecast water demand is consistent pages 3-3 with the adopted city or county's population growth projections. If a different growth projection is used, provide an explanation of the to 3-4 & alternative growth projection and methodology. 4-10 c) For cities and towns that provide water service: All water service area policies of the city or town described in the plan conform to all Pages 5-1 & relevant utility service extension ordinances. 5-2 d) Service area policies for new service connections conform to the adopted local plans and adopted development regulations of all Pages 5-1 & cities and counties with jurisdiction over the service area. 5-2 e) Other relevant elements related to water supply are addressed in the water system plan, if applicable. This may include Coordinated Water Not Not System Plans, Regional Wastewater Plans, Reclaimed Water Plans, Groundwater Management Area Plans, and the Capital Facilities Applicable Applicable Element of local comprehensive plans. I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and that these specific elements are consistent with adopted local plans and development regulations. Signature Printed Name, Title, & Jurisdiction Date Packet Pg. 367 7.1.a Consistency Review Guidance For Use by Local Governments and Municipal Water Suppliers This checklist may be used to meet the requirements of WAC 246-290-108. When using an alternative format, it must describe all of the elements; la), b), c), d), and e), when they apply. For water system plans (WSP), a consistency review is required for the service area and any additional areas where a municipal water supplier wants to expand its water right's place of use For small water system management programs, a consistency review is only required for areas where a municipal water supplier wants to expand its water right's place -of -use. If no water right place -of -use expansion is requested, a consistency review is not required. For engineering documents, a consistency review is required for areas where a municipal water supplier wants to expand its water right's place -of -use (water system plan amendment is required). For noncommunity water systems, a consistency review is required when requesting a place -of -use expansion. All engineering documents must be submitted with a service area map (WAC 246-290- 110(4)(b)(ii)). A) Documenting Consistency: The planning or engineering document must include the following when applicable. a) A copy of the adopted land use/zoning map corresponding to the service area. The uses provided in the WSP should be consistent with the adopted land use/zoning map. Include any other portions of comprehensive plans or development regulations that relate to water supply planning. b) A copy of the growth projections that correspond to the service area. If the local population growth projections are not used, explain in detail why the chosen projections more accurately describe the expected growth rate. Explain how it is consistent with the adopted land use. c) Include water service area policies and show that they are consistent with the utility service extension ordinances within the city or town boundaries. This applies to cities and towns only. d) All service area policies for how new water service will be provided to new customers. e) Other relevant elements the Department of Health determines are related to water supply planning. See Local Government Consistency — Other Relevant Elements, Policy B.07, September 2009. B) Documenting an Inconsistency: Please document the inconsistency, include the citation from the comprehensive plan or development regulation, and explain how to resolve the inconsistency. C) Documenting a Lack of Local Review for Consistency: Where the local government with jurisdiction did not provide a consistency review, document efforts made and the amount of time provided to the local government for review. Please include: name of contact, date, and efforts made (letters, phone calf and emails). To self -certify, please contact the DOH Planner. The Department of Health is an equal opportunity agency. For persons with disabilities, this document is available on request in other formats. To submit a request, please call 1-800-525-0127 (TTY 1-800-833-6388). February 2016 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 368 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX E Packet Pg. 369 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 370 OF EDAf O #P71 7.1.a Purpose of Checklist. CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City ofEdmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michele (Mike) De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer, 121 5t3i Ave N, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425-771-0220) 4. Date checklist prepared: June 15, 2017. 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Edmonds OLE Council and the Edmonds Planninz board will each hold a public hearing on the Water System Plan in the Summer of 2017. Projects in the Plan will be implemented over the twentE-vear planning horizon. Revised on 9116116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page I of 21 Packet Pg. 371 7.1.a (STAFF 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Capital improvements are idenh aed in the plan and scheduled to occur over the next twenty years. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA checklist for adoption of the Comprehensive Water System Plan. Environmental review for projects identified in the plan will be conducted as necessary. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Edmonds City Council Adoption Approval from the Washington State Department of Health (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Comprehensive Water System Plan is a planning document used to evaluatethe City of Edmonds water system and plan future improvements for ten and twen(y year planning horizons. The plan describes the water system in detail, including sources of water, treatment, and distribution. An improvement program is established based on projected system needs. The plan also looks at a conservation program, water system standards, operations and maintenance. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 2 of 21 Packet Pg. 372 7.1.a 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The City of Edmonds retail water service area is within the city limits with the boundary defined by the city limits, except for the southwest portion of the City that is served by the Olympric View Water & Sewer District. These limits are generally defined as the area that extends north to Meadowdale Beach Park, south to 244" Street SW along the Snohomish/King County boundary, and west to Puget Sound. The easter boundary of the city limits generally ollows Olympifc View Drive, 76`h Ave West, and Highway 99 except for a small portion of the city bounded on the west by Hikhway 99 and Lake Ballinger to the east between 220`h Street SW and 244" Street SW (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The City's water service area is located in a relatively hilly portion of southwest Snohomish County. The him elevation in the City is in the southeast corner at over 450 feet. The topography of the City' service area generally slopes downward from east to west toward Puget Sound with the exception of the southwest corner o, the service area which slopes down toward Lake Balling (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Greater than 40% (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. County soil survey mapping developed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) indicate that the predominant soils found across the City are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, and Alderwood urban land complex. Other soils with a much smaller extend include Kitsap silt loam, McKenna gravelly silt loam and Mukilteo muck. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 3 of 21 Packet Pg. 373 7.1.a d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, particularly in the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area in the Meadowdale Beach area of the City. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion may occur during construction ofsystem maintenance/improvement projects identified in the plan. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. (STAFF COM h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction of temporary erosion and sediment control plans will be developed for construction activities and best management practices used to minimize and control erosion. (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. (STAFF COM b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? if so, generally describe. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 4 of 21 Packet Pg. 374 7.1.a C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The City of Edmonds sits along the eastern shores of Puget Sound and contains a number of relatively small streams including Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek, Hindley Creek, Northstream, Fruitdale Creek, Perrinville Creek, Meadowdale Creek, and a number of smaller unnamed creeks. Portions ofLake Ballinger are also located within the City ofEdmonds' jurisdiction. (STAFF C (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The City currently supplies its entire system through the Alderwood Supply Station with water purchased from Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD), which in turn purchases the water from the City of Everett. The Everett raw water supply originates in the Spada Reservoir created by the Culmback Dam on the Sultan River, approximately 25 miles east of Everett. The raw water passes through the Snohomish county PUD No.I Power House prior to entering the Chaplain Reservoir. The water from this reservoir is delivered to the Everett Water Filtration Plant prior to delivery to the City of Everett, AWWD, the City of Edmonds, and several other water systems in Snohomish County. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 5 of 21 Packet Pg. 375 7.1.a b. C. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. There are limited areas within the city limits within the 100 ;year floodplain as identified in FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Some areas identified include limited areas along Puget Sound, around Lake Ballinger, and the mouth of Shell Creek north of Caspers Street. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Alderwood Water and Wastewater District has an artesian well on 164' Street which ,flows at a rate of approximately 10 gallons per minute. This well is maintained as a courtesy to residents who want untreated water, but the well is not connected to the water system that serves the City ofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 6 of 21 Packet Pg. 376 7.1.a (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:_ X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X I grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: X water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 7 of 21 Packet Pg. 377 7.1.a 5. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to be located within the City of Edmonds. Washing State Department of Natural Resources natural heritage site data does not show any rare, threatened, or endangeredplant species in the City ofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. This is a not a site specific project. Some noxius/invasive plants may exist as listed in Washington State's Noxious Weeds That Harm Washington State (Western Washington Guide) http://www.nwcb.wa.goy/pdfs/WestemFieldGuide.12df (STAFF COMMENTS) Animals a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near b. the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Salmon, Killer Whale, Trout (STAFF COMMENTS) List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound contains a number of threatened and endangeredspecies including: Southern Resident Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) Puget Sound DPS steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Puget Sound ESU Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 8 of 21 Packet Pg. 378 7.1.a 6. Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Edmonds is located within the Pacifcc Flyway. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. This is not a site specific project. Some invasive animal species may exist as listed in Washington State Aquatic Nuisance Species Committee Report to the 2012 Legislature. (STAFF COMMENTS) Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity is necessary to run pump stations. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. C. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 9 of 21 Packet Pg. 379 7.1.a 7 Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. The water is treated at the Everett Water Filtration Plant with chlorine and fluoride. The 41derwood Water and Wastewater District also chlorinates the water at its reservoir sites to ensure sufficient chlorine residual throughout the distribution system. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The City of Everett provides source water quality monitoring for its surface water source. The City of Edmonds provides the required quality monitoring of its distribution system in accourdance with WAC 246-290-300. (STAFF C Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 10 of 21 Packet Pg. 380 7.1.a 8. b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Single familv residential uses are relativelv evenlv dispersed throughtout the city ando ccunv the maiority of the city's land use base. Approximately 3,100 acres, or SS percent of the City's area is developed° or single familX residential uses. Higher density residential development (including apartments and condominiums) are primarily located south and north of the downtown; in the vicinity of the Edmonds-Woodway High School site and Swedish Hospital; and adjacent to 196t' Street, 76`h Avenue and Highway 99. Together, single family and milti family residential units comprise approximately 3,400 acres (nearly 60 percent of the total land in the CiW. Commercial activity is concentrated in two principal areas the Downtown/Waterfront and the Highway 99 corridor (which includes the retail and medical development in the vicinity of Swedish Hospital). Smaller commercial nodes that primarily serve adjacent neighborhoods are located at the intersection of Edmonds Way (5R104) and 100' Avenue/9' Avenue (Westgate) and at 212`h Street184' Avenue (S Corners The Port of Edmonds is located in the southern portion of the city's waterfront. The Port owns and manages 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats proximately 11 acres The Port's property is occupied by approximately 80 businesses including office uses located in Harbor Square. ADDroximately 258 acres of narks and oven space lands are owned or operated by the Citv. while there are another 229 acres of County owned parks and open space land in the Edmonds area. Regional parks and beaches figure prominently in the City, including Brackett's Landing North and South, the Edmonds Fishing Pier, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, Edmonds Underwater Park, Marina Beach Park, Olympic Beach Park, local tidelands, and the South County Senior Center. The Edmonds Marsh is a significant City owned open space (23 Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 11 of 21 Packet Pg. 381 acres), while Yost Memorial Park is the largest community park owned by the City_(48 acres). The largest County resources are Southwest County Park (120 acres) and Meadowdale Beach County Park (95 acres). Overall approximately 96 percent of the City is developed. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. Typical urban development. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. U (STAFF COMMENTS) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 12 of 21 Packet Pg. 382 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. Shoreline areas are along Puget Sound and Lake Balling (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. Critical Areas are defined in ECDC 23.40 through ECDC 23.90. (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The City of Edmonds population currently is approximately 40,000 with a proiected population of 46,000. The population located within the service area is approximately 32,000. Pro'et cted population within the service area at the end of the twenox year planning horizon is 36,800. (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The plans and policies of the City of Edmonds and Snohomish County must be consistent in accordance with GMA pursuant to RCW 36.70A.100. The GMA also requires consistency with the implementation of water system plans and comprehensive plans pursuant to RCW 36.70A.120. The Municipal Water Law, which became effective in 2003, also requires consistency of water system plans with local plans and regulations. Confirmation of consistency under this law is achieved by means of Completing the Consistency Statement Checklist, which must be included with all water system plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan -doe Page 13 of 21 Packet Pg. 383 7.1.a In. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? The existing Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir is approximately 50 feet tall. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 14 of 21 Packet Pg. 384 7.1.a C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A number of recreational opportunities are available through the City of Edmonds including a number of City Parks, a dive park, beaches along Puget Sound, and numerous festivals held in the City thoughout the year. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? if so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 15 of 21 Packet Pg. 385 7.1.a C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. There are a number of places and/or structures on the state and local historical registers which include several residences, a cemetery, and a Carnegie Library. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 16 of 21 Packet Pg. 386 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Numerous streets throughout the City. Main arterials include State Route 104, State Route 524, and Hi w y 99. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Ferry, train, and bus. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The Water System Plan identifies a number of improvements to the system, including water main projects. The selection and implementation of these water main proiects will be accomplished annually by the City, utilizing a priority ranking system. This provides the City with flexibility to coordinate water main proiects with street or other proiects that may be planned for the same area. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan -doe Page 17 of 21 Packet Pg. 387 7.1.a g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: All utilites are available within the QU ofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The water system plan describes how the City ofEdmonds will provide water to its service area. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan -doe Page 18 of 21 Packet Pg. 388 7.1.a C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 19 of 21 Packet Pg. 389 7.1.a D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Replacement of pipes and other repairs to the water system in the future will result in normal construction noise and construction vehicles and equipment would also temporarily increase emissions to the air. Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Construction protects must comply with the City's noise abatement and control regulations in ECC 5.30. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The improvements recommended in the water system plan are not anticipated to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Water use within the service area is expected to grow with projected increases in population. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Conservation measures will help reduce water use and water demand. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Neither the water system plan nor improvements recommended in the plan are anticipated to affect environmentally sensitive or protected areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The water system plan is consistent with land use plans adopted by the City of Edmonds and Snohomish County and will not allow or encourage incompatible land uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The improvements recommended in the water system plan are primarily infrastructure improvements of the existing system. The improvements are also planned to meet the anticipated needs of growth. The water system plan is not expected to increase demand. Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 20 of 21 Packet Pg. 390 7.1.a Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Water Division has developed a preventive maintenance program to ensure all critical components of the water system are properly functioningand nd rely maintained for longtperformance and reliabilit. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. It is not anticipated that improvements recommended in the plan will conflict with existing Lcgulations. All improvements will be coordinated with local, state, and federal agencies or appropriate permits. Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 21 of 21 Packet Pg. 391 7.1.a APPENDIX F c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 392 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 393 7.1.a City of Edmonds Water Use Efficiency Program January 2017 Packet Pg. 394 7.1.a Current Water Conservation Program The City of Edmonds has been an active participant in the Everett Water Utilities Water Conservation Program since the late 1990's. In addition, other programs specific to Edmonds have been ongoing as well, including leak detection surveys, an annual water main replacement program, and bills showing water consumption history. A summary of these programs is as follows: Leak Detection Surveys — The city has leak detection equipment and has an ongoing leak detection program. Once leaks are identified, they are repaired as soon as possible. Water Main Replacement Program — Each year the City replaces approximately 1.5 miles of the distribution system. Bills Showing Consumption History — Customer bills that provide historical water consumption data allow customers to understand how their use varies throughout the year. This information helps customers make informed choices about how they manage their water use, including implementing conservation. The City's customer bills depict consumption data for the preceding year, in 2-month increments, shown on a simple bar graph (see example below). Meter # Prev Read 1 Prev Read 2 Prey Read 3 Curr 02te Curr Read 1 Curr Read 2 Curr Reed 3 TOTAL 2015 1,129 0 0 5/2512017 1,143 0 4 14 Water Usage m 14 14 w 12 — - to oEl z 0 r U to ¢ z O Each lint= i I] O= 748 gallons TMThe pramly owner a kQely mmonsible Ior am charges RLL V81FEDUTILMYINLLSREMAIN AGAINST THE PROPERTYEVENIFTHERE IS CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP MVEhIT—TER 6S Tnin bil is corraidered daimquml if nW pwd o rum by 1hv Due Data. Tv maFm a paymead yvu may Use mir payment drop bay Ircared at Ctly Noll. 121 5th Avenue, pay in paradn of City Ham rwll your payment, t10 a onetime psymcnt or enrol ter nRdmal6c payfnenle online at EdmarxlaLltAttyPaymenis.wm Checks a M onay ❑tdets 5hoold be made payablo ID the C my of F dmnnd4 MIJANED-LTF. ; If parnant is returned Unpaid by your yank. Iepsyrrrrrd will be requh nd in &m form ❑tcash money order. Cashier scheck W veNVU&dd card stoop W@h a = 00 rehrnad dery fat If Ine Payment was made iEa, too Ova Data tv Vo4 hem off, nr_we vnbl ne dtecdriwied Immediately and add, tonal games vn9 be aWiad to the ;;=uht. DELIMQUENCY_ Onco the account Ibaimmae d9lmquanl It ve It be a,lhlev an a SS 00 perabty. Qwriquent ay..Counta W%3y have the water dLs"nirected andior Ilion f Ied aani-* the prowly, CrrY OF EDMONDS • 121 STH AVE N • EDMONDS. WA 90020.425.77142a1 Pay your bull or enroll for automatic payments online at EdmondsUtlii yPayments,com School -Based Education — As part of the regional Everett Water Utility Committee (EWUC), the City participates in school -based education programs, including classroom presentations, teacher workshops, and classroom educational materials. The classroom presentations are facilitated by trained instructors with curriculum designed for elementary, middle school, and high school students. The presentations are marketed to teachers through newsletters and other communications. Packet Pg. 395 7.1.a The teacher workshops assist teachers who educate students about water resource issues, including conservation. Teachers participate in activities, experiments, and go on field trips. Teachers can receive continuing education credits or clock hours. The classroom educational materials include a broad collection of items such as books, videos, posters and other supplies. Public Outreach — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City engages in general public outreach intended to build and reinforce a water conservation ethic among customers. These efforts include distribution of brochures, a summer watering calendar, transit advertising, and other regional efforts. The City distributes several educational brochures developed by Everett and its wholesale partners. For example, the "Everyday Conservation" brochure provides conservation tips for inside and outside the home, the "Smart Watering" brochure contains information on efficient lawn and garden watering techniques, and the "Growing Healthy Soil" brochure has information on how soil can be improved as a means of reducing water use. The City also has a summer watering calendar available each year for customers that encourages them to water every third day (staggered, based on their street address). This effort helps to reduce the daily peak demand for water in the summer by decreasing the amount of watering that occurs on a given day. Transit advertising is employed to convey conservation messaging. Billboards promoting various conservation themes have been posted on buses during the summer months when demand peaks. It is estimated that these billboards are seen by over 75 percent of the residents in the service area of Everett and its wholesale partners each year. The City, through EWUC, plays an active role in regional organizations that promote water conservation. EWUC has been an active member of the Partnership for Water Conservation and it predecessor, the Water Conservation Coalition of Puget Sound, for over a decade. Indoor Retrofit Kits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City has offered free indoor water conservation kits to residential customers since 2001. The kits target homes constructed before 1993 and are designed to encourage customers to upgrade their fixtures to current efficiency standards. In 1993, the National Plumbing Code of 1991 was adopted in Washington State and increased efficiency standards for household water fixtures. The kits are marketed through announcements in local newspapers, the city's newsletter, and through other local online news sources. The kits include a low -flow showerhead and two faucet aerators. The kits are estimated to save 34 gallons of water per day. These estimates are conservative and do not attribute any 2 Packet Pg. 396 7.1.a savings to leak reduction or behavioral changes, both of which are likely to occur. Approximately 1260 kits have been distributed to City of Edmonds residents beginning 2007-2015. Outdoor Irrigation Items — As part of the EWUC program, the City has offered free outdoor water conservation items to residential customers since 2001. The items target households with irrigated landscape areas, primarily single family homes that do not have automatic irrigation systems. The items are designed to encourage customers to reduce watering and other outdoor water use. Studies indicate most households overwater their landscape area by 15 to 20 percent. The items are marketed through announcements in local newspapers, the city newsletter, and through other local online sources. The items include an automatic shut-off watering timer for use with lawn sprinkler or drip hose, an adjustable spray hose nozzle, and a soil moisture meter. These items are estimated to save an average of 40 gallons of water per day. Approximately 1900 outdoor items have been distributed to City of Edmonds residents beginning 2007-2015. School Irrigation System Audits — As art of the regional EWUC program, the Everett Water Utility began offering a school irrigation audit and upgrade program in 2001. The program is targeted at schools with large irrigation demands. Most schools have large sport fields that require significant watering in the summer. The irrigation demand at schools with multiple fields can account for three quarters of their annual water consumption. The irrigation audits are designed to improve efficiency of irrigation systems, resulting in great water savings. The audits are conducted by a professional irrigation system auditor and identify equipment upgrades and/or operational changes that will result in decreased water use. Average savings are estimated to be 20 to 25 percent of the annual irrigation demand. Financial assistance, in the form of a 50 percent cost share, is available to provide incentive to the schools to follow through on the audit recommendations. The Edmonds School District was one of the districts that took advantage of the offer for the audits and subsequently implemented some measures since 2003. After installing a Maxicom comprehensive irrigation controller, the district reported savings of 0.006 million gallons per day (MGD) at the Edmonds-Woodway High School and a savings of 0.007 MGD at the Chase Lake Elementary School. Both schools are within the City of Edmonds. 3 Packet Pg. 397 7.1.a Water Use Efficiency Goal Establishment During the previous 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan Update, city staff gave a public presentation on the plan, including information on the water conservation program in effect at the time. At the August 3rd, 2010 Edmonds City Council Meeting, staff advised the council, and the general public, of the requirement to obtain public comment on water use efficiency measures which would benefit the City of Edmonds. The goal is to reduce average annual water consumption by a minimum of one percent on a per capita basis and participate in Everett's regional water efficiency program. On April 6tn, 2010 City staff discussed with the council alternative water utility rate structures. The City currently uses a uniform utility rate structure. The discussion included inclining block and seasonal rate charges. The conclusion was to continue with the uniform utility rate structure since the conservation goal is being met. Estimated Annual Savings — The estimated conservation savings the City will have while participating in the regional conservation program will be a 2 percent reduction in water demand. Distribution System Leakage — Based on 2016 water consumption records, the overall non - revenue water amount equates to 10.88 percent, with a 3-year average of 9.1 percent average of the total water supplied by the Alderwood Water District and Seattle Public Utility (SPU) master meters. The City will continue to monitor its records to provide documentation that the overall system leakage remains below 10 percent. Planned Water Use Efficiency Measures for 2014-2019 — The City will continue to participate with the Everett Water Utility Regional Conservation Program. This program, as demonstrated by the City of Everett, is shown to be very cost effective. The cost is included in the wholesale water pricing to Edmonds and equates to one percent of the average water bill. A summary of the planned water use efficiency measures is as follows: Leak detection surveys — The City will continue to survey the water system for leaks. Water main replacement program — The City will continue this program at a cost of approximately $2 million annually. Bills showing water consumption history — The City will continue to provide this information and offer ways for customers to obtain additional information via the city website. 4 Packet Pg. 398 7.1.a School -based education — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to participate in school -based education programs including classroom presentation, teacher workshops, and classroom educational materials. Public Outreach — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to participate in public outreach programs including water conservation brochures, summer lawn watering calendar, transit advertising, and other regional efforts. Indoor retrofit kits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to offer indoor retrofit kits. This measure applies to the single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers. Different versions of the kit will be available to each sector. The single-family kits consist of a 2.0 gallons per minute (GPM) showerhead and a 1.0 GPM bathroom faucet aerators. Those flow rates are more efficient than the maximum allowed under the plumbing code. The multi -family kits include those measures plus 2.2 GPM kitchen faucet aerators, which are treated as bringing customers up to code, even though technically the maximum flow rate allowed under the plumbing code is slightly higher at 2.5 GPM. Kitchen faucet aerators are only included in the multi -family kits since the measure analysis concluded that the majority of the single-family sector has already been brought up to code due to natural replacement and distribution of the previous kits, which were targeted primarily to single-family customers. Outdoor irrigation kits — This measure is a modification of the outdoor retrofit kits, as already described, which the City has offered as part of the regional EWUC program. This measure applies to the single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers. These are free outdoor irrigation kits with devices and information to improve the irrigation efficiency of residential customers that manually irrigate their landscaping. Historically, the kits have included items such as a water timer and shut-off device, a spring - loaded hose nozzle, a rain gauge, hose washers, and a conservation brochure. While the exact contents of the new kits have not been determined, the contents will be slightly different than the previous outdoor kits. Toilet leak detection — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will expand one component of the previous EWUC indoor kits. This measure provides free toilet leak detection dye strips for customers to determine if their toilets leak and provides detailed information on how to fix leaks. This measure applies to single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers, and businesses with tank -style toilets. Only tank - style toilets are targeted since most leaks occur in that type of toilet, usually vial flapper leaks. School irrigation system audits — This measure is a modification of the school irrigation audit and upgrade program already described, as art of the regional EWUC program. This 5 Packet Pg. 399 7.1.a measure provides free irrigation audits to schools to improve the efficiency of irrigation systems. Efficiencies can be achieved through hardware improvements or operational changes. The audits are performed by a professional landscape irrigation auditor. The measure is applied to existing customers in the non-residential sector. The financial assistance that had been provided to implement audit recommendations has been eliminated in order to reduce program costs. Commercial indoor audits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will begin offering indoor audits to non-residential customer. This is a modified version of a measure which Everett has been implementing in its retail service area. This measure provides free indoor audits to non-residential customers to determine efficiencies that could be achieved through hardware improvements or operational changes. The audits are performed by a professional auditor. The measure is applied to the non-residential sector, both existing and new customers. Conservation rate structures — Currently Edmond customers are billed based on a relatively small fixed charge, along with a uniform rate for actual consumption. As part of the next comprehensive plan update in 2016, the City will review conservation rate structure, including inclining block and seasonal rates. Reclaimed water opportunities — The next comprehensive plan update will also investigate the feasibility and opportunities to use reclaimed water. Water Supply Summary — The City of Edmonds water supply originates in the Cascade Mountains at Spada Lake, a man-made reservoir formed from damming the Sultan River in the 1960's. The reservoir receives rainfall and snowmelt which then is piped downstream to Chaplain Reservoir and further delivered via four large transmission lines to the City of Everett. From there some water is then delivered to large storage reservoirs, such as those operated by the Alderwood Water District. The District then conveys water to different service areas, among those the City of Edmonds. Spada Reservoir has a storage capacity of 50 billion gallons and is located in steep mountain terrain that receives an average of 165 inches of precipitation a year. This map represents the flow of the Everett water supply from Spada Reservoir to Everett proper via transmission lines. Water is then conveyed down the I-5 and State Highway 99 corridor with one final destination being the City of Edmonds shown along Puget Sound in the southwest corner. 0 Packet Pg. 400 7.1.a ■ s Lake Sh!`emLsc aimw C f i ll.��lll dlkummidf 99 \ r,� . APLf �UiA � SrF.-r L3kc � - - Gii�n -Z) Mmnrve s F Cbld $u L g ■1« �k1nob ,l ■ --J L � I 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 City of Edmonds Annual Water Consumption SEATTLE CCF ALDERWOOD CCF COMBINED CCF ♦ TREND LINE 0� g0 00 0� 00 03 0� 0D 00 0A 0`b 0°1 00 O� 00 O5 O� O� O1O O� O� O°' �O ^^ ^ N� N� Nb NO NO NO NO ^0 NO) NO NO NO NO NO N0 ^0 1P 1O f 0 P l0 L0 P f f 10 l 5 'O rP 10 '0 P rp 7 Packet Pg. 401 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX G Packet Pg. 402 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 403 7.1.a July 24, 2001 FOREWORD Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 18.00.040, these City of Edmonds Construction Standard Details and Specifications, hereinafter referred to as "Edmonds Standard Details", shall apply whenever any public or private work is performed within the City of Edmonds, including work performed by private parties at their own expense. City capital improvement projects will be required to meet all the conditions within these standards unless the City Engineer approves an exception from the design standard in effect at the time of construction. Except where these Edmonds Standards Details provide otherwise, design, construction and materials shall conform to the appropriate standards of the most current edition of the following publications produced separately by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) or jointly by WSDOT and Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA). • WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications". • WSDOT/APWA Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT/APWA Standard Plans". The City Engineer is hereby delegated the authority to allow minor deviations to these standards after review of evidence submitted by the developer, establishing that such modifications are equal to or better than the requirements in these standards, that they are in the public interest, that they are based upon sound engineering practices and judgment, and that requirements for safety, function, appearance and maintainability are fully met. Such deviations from the standards must be submitted, reviewed and approved in writing by the City Engineer prior to construction. The City Engineer will make the decision as to whether a requested deviation or alternative will be allowed. Revisions to these Edmonds Standard Details may be issued periodically by the City Engineer as necessary to make corrections or clarifications or to conform to current municipal practices, state or federal standards and new technology. Such revisions will be formally issued by the City Engineer in writing, entered into the Standard Details and recorded in the Revision Log. NOEL MILLER, P.E. Public Works Director Packet Pg. 404 7.1.a EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS Modifications to Standard Specifications Log Revision Title Date April 2012 Modifications to Division 2 of Technical Specifications (Earthwork) April 2012 Modifications to Divisions 5 through 7 April 2012 Modifications to Division 9 of Technical Specifications (Materials) January 2015 Material Modifications to Divisions 7, 8 and 9 Packet Pg. 405 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 2 - EARTHWORK OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: 2-09 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION 2-09.1 Description Delete this section and replace it with the following section 2-09.1: 2-09.1 Description This section covers the work necessary for trench excavation and backfill for all pipelines, complete. A. Trench Excavation Excavation is unclassified. Complete all excavation regardless of the type of materials encountered. The contractor shall do an estimate of the kind and extent of the various materials that will be encountered in the excavation. B. Type of Bedding Bedding consists of pipe base and pipe zone material. Pipe zone material shall be required for all pipe. Pipe base material will be required for pipes except ductile iron pipe. Pipe base material for ductile iron shall be required when, in the opinion of the Engineer, the native trench bottom is not suitable for laying pipe. C. Types of Backfill For bidding purpose, the class of backfill to be used above the pipe zone is indicated on the plans or class D if not shown. The City reserves the right to modify the use, location, and quantities of the various types of backfill during construction according to the established bid item prices. The Engineer will designate the type of backfill to be used in each location throughout the construction of the project. The general classifications of backfill are as listed below: 1. Class B Class B backfill will be used in unsurfaced areas where compaction and subsequent settlement are not critical. 2. Class C Class C backfill will be used in unsurfaced areas or road shoulders where reseeding, sod replacement, or shoulder replacement will be required. Compaction in these applications is important, as the subsequent settlement must be held to a minimum. 3. Class D Class D backfill will be used in unsurfaced and surfaced areas where compaction is critical to ensure that no settlement occurs. Pavement replacement and shoulder replacement will be made shortly after backfilling. D. Water for Trench Compaction The contractor shall make all arrangements for a source of water. All City water shall be metered and supervised by the City. The contractor shall be responsible for any deposit fees. 2-09.3 Construction Requirements Supplement this section with the following section 2-09.3(5): 2-09.3(5)A. Surface Preparation for Excavation Conform to subsection 2.01 Clearing, Grubbing and Roadside Cleanup 2-09.3(5)B. Trench Excavation and Shoring 1. Open Trench Limited The length of trench excavated in advance of the pipe laying operation shall be kept to a minimum, and in no case shall it exceed three hundred (300) feet, unless specifically authorized by the Engineer. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 1 Packet Pg. 406 7.1.a 2. Trench Width Contractor shall conform to state and federal laws. Minimum width of unsheeted trench in which pipe is to be laid shall be eighteen (18) inches greater than the outside diameter of the pipe, or as approved. Sheeting requirements on each side shall be independent of trench widths. The maximum permissible trench width from the bottom of the trench to the crown of the pipe shall be as follows: 15 inch diameter and smaller 40 inches 18 inch diameter and larger 1-1/2 times the inside diameter of the pipe plus 18 inches If the maximum trench width at the crown of the pipe is exceeded by the contractor without the written authorization of the Engineer, the contractor will be required, at his own expense, to provide pipe of higher strength classification or to provide a higher class of bedding, as approved by the Engineer. Maximum permissible trench widths shall be as shown on the plans. If the maximum permissible trench width is exceeded, contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with the additional trench width including, but not limited to, backfill and surface restoration. 3. Trench Safety Systems Safety systems shall be provided in conformance to Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act, Chapter 49.17 RCW. 4. Grade Excavate the trench to the lines and grades shown or as established by the Engineer (Section 1-05.4) with proper allowance for pipe thickness and for pipe bedding (base) material as required. If the trench is excavated below the required grade, correct any part of the trench excavated below the grade with material of the type specified for pipe bedding at no additional cost to the City. 5. Bell (Joint) Holes At the location of each joint, the contractor shall dig bell (joint) holes of ample dimensions in the bottom of the trench and at the sides where necessary to permit the joint to be made properly and to permit easy visual inspection of the joint. 6. Disposal of Excess Excavated Material Contractor shall make arrangements for the disposal of all excess material and bear all costs. 7. Shoring, Sheeting, and Bracing of Trenches All sheeting, shoring, and bracing of trenches shall conform to the safety requirements of the federal, state, or local public agency having jurisdiction and as required to protect the pipe. The most stringent of these requirements shall apply. 8. Location of Excavated Materials During trench excavation, contractor shall place the excavated material only within the construction easement, right-of-way, or approved working area in such a manner that it will cause a minimum of inconvenience to the traveling public and provide for merging traffic where necessary. Contractor shall not obstruct both lanes of traffic on any private or public traveled roadways or streets. The contractor shall also take the necessary steps to control erosion of the excavated material. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 2 Packet Pg. 407 2-09.3(5)C. Dewatering The contractor shall furnish, install, operate, and maintain all necessary machinery, appliances, and equipment to keep excavations free from water during construction, and shall dewater and dispose of the water so as not to cause injury to public or private property or to cause a nuisance or a menace to the public. Disposal options for dewatering water, depending on site constraints, may include: • Infiltration in an area approved by the Engineer, • Transport offsite in a vehicle such as a vacuum flush truck, for legal disposal in a manner that does not pollute state waters, • Department of Ecology approved onsite chemical treatment or other suitable treatment technologies, • Sanitary sewer discharge with City sewer department approval • Use of sedimentation bag with outfall to a ditch or swale for small volumes of localized dewatering. 2-09.3(5)E. Trench Backfill 1. General When backfill is placed mechanically, push the backfill material onto the slope of the previously placed and allow the material to slide down into the trench. Do not push backfill into the trench in such a way as to permit free fall until two (2) feet of cover or more is provided over the top of the pipe. Under no circumstances, allow sharp or heavy pieces of material to drop directly onto the pipe or the tamped material around it. All backfill, regardless of class, shall be placed in successive layers not to exceed eight (8) inches in loose thickness and each layer shall be compacted to the density specified herein. At no time shall backfill material be placed in the trench if the moisture content exceeds two percent (2%) of optimum moisture for the approved backfill material. If the moisture content is less than two percent (2%) of the optimum, additional water may be required based on the recommendations of the City's soils testing consultant or approval from the City Engineer. Backfilled trenches shall be reasonably smooth, free from ruts and material neatly windowed over the trench and excess removed. If the trench is over driveways, roadways or paved shoulders, the surface shall be temporarily covered with two (2) inches of cold mix per the standard trench detail. Unpaved surfaces shall have material neatly mounded not more than six (6) inches above the existing ground for the entire width of the trench. Estimate and provide the amount of backfill material required so after normal settlement, the finished surface will meet the existing grade. Any excess or deficiency after normal settlement shall be corrected accordingly. Screen all boulders and stones from the backfill material that are two (2) inches in diameter or larger in the upper twelve (12) inches of the backfill. When, in the opinion of the Engineer, selected backfill material is unsatisfactory, the contractor shall furnish imported backfill material as approved by the Engineer. 2. Class B Backfill Backfill the trench above the pipe zone and compact to ninety percent (90%) of maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2). Determine the type of compaction required to prevent subsequent settlement. 3. Class C Backfill Backfill the trench above the pipe zone and compact to ninety percent (90%) of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2). Determine the type of compaction required to prevent subsequent settlement. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 3 Packet Pg. 408 7.1.a Class D Backfill Backfill the trench above the pipe zone with approved backfill material to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) as determined by ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2),If the native material does not comply with the specifications, the contractor shall use imported material as approved by the Engineer. 5. Maintenance of Trench Backfill Any subsequent settlement of the finished surface during the warranty period shall be considered a result of improper or insufficient compaction and/or excessive moisture content and shall be promptly repaired by the contractor at no cost to the City. Maintain the backfilled trench surface until the following applicable operations have been completed and approved by the Engineer: a. Service connections, installed and backfilled. b. Valves, valve boxes, and hydrants installed. C. Pressure testing. d. Cleaning, flushing, and sterilization. e. Cleanup and restoration of all physical features. f. Utilities restored to their original condition or better. g. All work required between the two valves or manholes accomplished, with the exception of final surfacing. This maintenance shall include, but not limited to, keeping the surface of backfilled trenches reasonably smooth, free from ruts and potholes, and suitable for normal traffic flow, where applicable. No additional payment will be made for the maintenance of the trench Backfill before completion of the work outlined above, except for cold mix asphalt when directed or requested by the Engineer. No final pavement replacement shall be undertaken until all items outlined above have been completed and approved by the Engineer. Maintenance of backfilled trenches is considered to be incidental to this item of work, and payment for such maintenance will be considered as included in payment for class of Backfill. 2-09.3(5)F. Compaction of Backfill Mechanical compaction is generally recommended for trenches. Contractor will supply, operate and maintain the proper equipment to compact the classification of material relative to the field conditions. Water settlement may be used to compact sand, pit run, and gravel type backfills. If the contractor desires to use water settling, he shall submit in detail to the Engineer for approval, the procedure to be used. The contractor, as directed by the Engineer and at no additional cost, shall excavate test holes to review the effectiveness of compaction. If, in the opinion of the Engineer, the specified compaction and densities are not being achieved in accordance with 1-06.2, the contractor shall recompact the backfill material. If required, water saturated material shall be removed, dried, and placed back in lifts or replaced with imported backfill material. The contractor shall be responsible for all costs for labor, materials, and delays resulting from improper compaction and recompaction. 2-09.3(5)G. Embankments Q 1. Structural Embankment Construct embankment to support the pipeline in accordance with the details shown on the plans. Spread excess excavated trench material in maximum one (1) foot lifts for the full width of the embankment cross section and compact to a minimum of ninety- five percent (95%) of maximum density for the full depth of the fill as determined by Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 4 Packet Pg. 409 7.1.a ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2). Compact the embankment to its final cross section before the trench excavation for the pipe is made. 2. Additional Pipe Cover In locations where insufficient pipe cover exists, place selected native material over the pipe as shown or directed to provide a minimum cover of three (3) feet. Slope pipe cover to prevent blockage of surface runoff. No additional payment will be made for furnishing additional pipe cover. 2-09.3(5)H. Drainage Ditch Restoration Undercrossings of ditches shall be backfilled with imported granular backfill material or as approved to within the top one (1) foot of the ditch bottom. Place approved rock or rip -rap material in the top foot. Correct any ditch damage as a result of contractor's operations at no cost to the City. Payment for ditch restoration will be considered as incidental to the project. 2-09.3(5)I. Cold Mix Asphalt Cold mix asphalt used for temporary repair of utility trenches or other small areas shall be placed by hand, then raked to a smooth and uniformly dense layer before compacting. On large areas, which have been determined by the Engineer to be temporarily repaired with cold mix asphalt, the mix shall be spread with mechanical spreading equipment, such as a "Layton Paver," to a smooth and uniformly dense layer before compacting. In areas inaccessible to the mechanical spreading equipment, cold mix shall be placed by hand. 2-09.3(5)J. Resurfacing Resurfacing, including asphalt patching, graveling, and landscaping shall be performed after the maintenance of trench backfill. 2-09.3(5)K. Settlement Any settlement observed in the backfill, embankment, or in structures, including pipelines and manholes built over compacted material or embankment within the warranty period will be considered to be caused by improper compaction methods and/or pumping due to excessive moisture and shall be corrected and repaired at no cost to the City. Pipelines and structures which have settled shall be removed and reconstructed to the original condition at time of acceptance at no cost to the City. 2-13 IMPERMEABLE MEMBRANE Add the following section 2-13: 2-13.1 Description This section described furnishing and installing an impermeable membrane as part of the subsurface drain. 2-13.1(1) Definitions Installer: The party responsible for field handling, storing, deploying, and other site aspects of impermeable membrane installations. Also responsible for transportation of these materials to the site. Also called Contractor. PVC Geomembrane Manufacturer: The party responsible for the production of the PVC geomembrane rolls. 2-13.1(2) Field Quality Control The Contractor shall inspect each impermeable membrane in its entirety. Any area showing a defect shall be marked and repaired in accordance with these Specifications. During the construction phase, each impermeable membrane shall be continuously inspected for uniformity, damage, and imperfections (for example, holes, cracks, thin spots, or foreign materials). Immediately after installation, each impermeable membrane shall be inspected to Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 5 Packet Pg. 410 7.1.a confirm the absence of tears, punctures, or blisters. Any imperfections shall be immediately repaired and re -inspected. 2-13.1(3) Transportation, Handling Storage, and Protection Use all means necessary to protect the material and Work of this Section before, during, and after installation. Impermeable membranes shall be marked and tagged with the following information: A. Manufacturer's name. B. Product identification. Promptly inspect shipments to assure that materials comply with requirements, quantities are correct, and materials are undamaged. Arrange storage of material to permit access for inspection. Periodically inspect to assure materials are undamaged and are maintained in acceptable conditions. Store impermeable membranes to protect from puncture, dirt, grease, water, moisture, mud, mechanical abrasions, excessive heat, or other damage. Store impermeable membrane on prepared flat surface (not on wooden pallets). Use appropriate handling equipment for deployment. Impermeable membrane damaged during handling shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Impermeable membrane irreparably damaged, as determined by Engineer, shall be immediately removed from the site and replaced. Repair, removal, and replacement shall be solely at Contractor's expense. 2-13.2 Materials The material supplied under these Specifications shall be first quality industrial grade products designed and manufactured specifically for the purposes of this work, and which have been satisfactorily demonstrated by prior use to be suitable and durable for use intended. The impermeable membrane material shall be PVC. The impermeable membrane shall conform to the properties detailed below: Test Test Designation Requirement 30 mil Thickness ASTM D 1593 28.5 mil Density ASTM D 792 1.20 Tensile Strength ASTM D 882 70 lbs/in. width Elongation ASTM D 882 300% Tear Resistance ASTM D 1004, Die C 8 lbs 1 All specification values are minimum roll values. The impermeable membranes shall be a homogeneous material uniform in color, thickness and surface texture, free of undispersed raw materials, streaks, foreign material, gels, and any signs of delamination, blisters, cracks, tears or pinholes. Impermeable membrane materials shall be chemically and temperature stable under the conditions in which they will be subjected, and shall contain no additives or filler which can leach out and cause deterioration over time. The sheeting shall be suitably formulated from a homopolymer vinyl chloride resin of Type GP in accordance with ASTM D 1755 to impart durability (ASTM D 3083). Use of water-soluble compounding ingredients is prohibited. Plasticizers that are resistant to migration, mildew, and bacterial degradation shall be used. The sheeting shall be pigmented to produce a uniform color and UV stabilized with carbon black. The sheeting shall be capable of being repaired with the use of solvent cement. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 6 Packet Pg. 411 7.1.a 2-13.2(1) Local Suppliers To assist the contractor, the names of the following local suppliers are provided: A. Northwest Lining and Geotextile Products, Inc., Kent, WA (253) 872-0244 B. Layfield Plastics. Bellevue, WA (800) 796-6868 Other local suppliers may also be available. 2-13.3 Construction Requirements 2-13.3(1) Inspection The Engineer will inspect the subgrade and give approval that it is suitable. 2-13.3(2) Installation 1. The impermeable membrane panels shall be installed to overlap by 1 foot as necessary. 2. During installation of the impermeable membrane, the following requirements shall be met: a. Install impermeable membrane using method that will not damage, stretch, or crimp impermeable membrane and protect underlying surface from damage. b. Personnel working on impermeable membranes shall not engage in activities that could damage the impermeable membrane. c. Unroll impermeable membrane using method that shall not damage, stretch, or crimp impermeable membrane and protect underlying surface from damage. 3. Membrane shall be laid underneath and on the north side of the subsurface drain trench, as shown on the contract drawings. 2-13.3(3) Visual Inspection During installation, visually examine all areas of overlap of the impermeable membrane for defects, holes, blister, undispersed raw materials, and any sign of contamination by foreign matter. Clean surface of the impermeable membrane prior to examination. Mark areas suspected of deficiencies. Repair each suspect location. 2-13.3(4) Repair Repair any portion of the impermeable membrane exhibiting a flaw or failing a visual inspection test in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Patches shall be made from the same material as the impermeable membrane and shall extend a minimum of 4 inches beyond the defect. Repair, removal, and replacement shall be at Contractor's expense. 2-14 CONCRETE SEGMENTAL BLOCK WALL Add the following section 2-14: 2-14.1 Description This section describes a small retaining wall enclosure constructed of concrete segmental blocks to be installed to replace the existing retaining wall on -site. 2-14.1(1) Submittals A. Submit the following: 1. Product Data: Material description and installation instructions for each manufactured product specified 2. Samples a. Furnish one unit in the color and face pattern specified. 3. Test Reports: Independent laboratory reports stating moisture absorption and compressive strength properties of the concrete retaining wall units meet the Project Specifications when tested in accordance with ASTM C140, Sections 6, 8 and 9. 2-14.1(2) Deliver.. See and Handling A. Deliver, store, and handle materials in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, in such a manner as to prevent damage. Check the materials upon delivery to assure that proper material has been received. Store above ground on wood pallets or blocking. Remove damaged or otherwise unsuitable material, when so determined, from the site. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 7 Packet Pg. 412 7.1.a Exposed faces of concrete wall units shall be free of chips, cracks, stains, and other imperfections detracting from their appearance, when viewed from a distance of 10 feet. Prevent mud, wet cement, adhesives and similar materials which may harm appearance of units, from coming in contact with system components. 2-14.2 Materials A. Concrete Blocks 1. Meet requirements of ASTM C1372, except the maximum water absorption shall be limited to 7 percent, and unit height dimensions shall not vary more than plus or minus 1/16 inch from that specified in the ASTM reference, not including textured face. 2. Unit Face Area: Not less than 0.33 square feet. 3. Color: Selected by the Engineer from manufacturer's full range of standard colors. 4. Face Pattern Geometry: Straight or tri-plane 5. Texture: Split Rock Face. 6. Include an integral concrete shear connection flange/locator. B. Construction Adhesive: Exterior grade adhesive as recommended by the retaining wall unit manufacturer. 2-14.3 Construction Requirements 2-14.3 (1) Examination A. Examine the areas and conditions under which the retaining wall system is to be erected, and notify the Engineer in writing of conditions detrimental to the proper and timely completion of the work. Do not proceed with the work until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. B. Verify the location of existing structure, features and utilities prior to excavation. 2-14.3(2) Excavation A. Excavate to the lines and grades shown on the Drawings. Over -excavation not approved by the Engineer will not be paid for by the Owner. Replacement of these soils with compacted fill and/or wall system components will be required at the Contractor's expense. Use care in excavating to prevent disturbance of the base beyond the lines shown. 2-14.3(3) Foundation Preparation A. Excavate foundation soil as required for footing or base dimension shown on the Drawings, or as directed by the Engineer. B. The Engineer will determine if the foundation soils will require special treatment or correction to control total and differential settlement. C. Fill over -excavated areas with suitable compacted backfill, as recommended by the Engineer. 2-14.3(4) Base Course Preparation A. Place base materials to the depths and widths shown on the Drawings. 1. Extend the leveling pad laterally at least 6 inches in front and behind the lowermost concrete retaining wall blocks. 2. Provide aggregate base compacted to 6 inches thick (minimum). 3. The Contractor may at their option, provide a concrete leveling pad, in lieu of the aggregate base. B. Compact aggregate base material to provide a level, hard surface on which to place the first course of blocks. C. Prepare base materials to ensure complete contact with retaining wall blocks. Gaps are not allowed. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 8 Packet Pg. 413 7.1.a 2-14.3(5) Erection A. General: Erect units in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and recommendations, and as specified herein. B. Place first course of concrete wall units on the prepared base material. Check units for level and alignment. Maintain the same elevation at the top of each unit within each section of the base course. C. Ensure that foundation units are in full contact with the compacted base. D. Place concrete wall blocks side -by -side for full length of wall alignment. Alignment may be done by using a string line measured from the back of the block. Gaps are not allowed between the foundation concrete wall blocks. E. Check each course for level and alignment. Adjust units as necessary to maintain level and alignment prior to proceeding with each additional course. F. Install each succeeding course. Backfill as each course is completed. Pull the units forward until the locating surface of the unit contacts the locating surface of the units in the preceding course. G. Interlock wall segments that meet at corners by overlapping successive courses. Attach concrete retaining wall units at exterior corners with adhesive specified. 2-14.3(6) Backfill Placement A. Place fill and compact with only lightweight hand -operated compaction equipment. 2-14.3(7) Cap Unit Installation A. Apply adhesive to the top surface of the unit below and place the cap unit into desired position. B. Cut cap units as necessary to obtain the proper fit. 2-14.3(8) Tolerances A. Site Construction Tolerances 1. Vertical Alignment: Plus or minus 1-1/2 inches over any 10-foot distance, with a maximum differential of 3 inches over the length of the wall. 2. Horizontal Location Control from Grading Plan a. Straight Lines: Plus or minus 1-1/2 inches over any 10-foot distance. b. Corner and Radius Locations: Plus or minus 12 inches. 3. Immediate Post Construction Wall Batter: Within 2 degrees of the design batter of the concrete retaining wall units. 4. Bulging: Plus or minus 1-1/4 inches over any 10-foot distance. 2-14.3(9) Adjusting and Cleaning A. Replace damaged units with new units as the work progresses. B. Remove debris caused by wall construction and leave adjacent paved areas broom clean. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 9 Packet Pg. 414 7.1.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r 0 N N t CD N N N C d E N N U) L .N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 415 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 5 - SURFACE TREATMENTS AND PAVEMENTS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 5-04 HOT MIX ASPHALT Supplement this section with the following: 5-04.3(4) Rollers Pneumatic tire rollers shall not be used unless specified in the Special Provisions. 5-04.3(17) Paving Under Traffic Open trenches within the traveled way or auxiliary lane shall have a steel -plate cover placed over them. A wedge of suitable materials, if required, shall be placed for a smooth transition between the pavement and the steel plate at the discretion of the Engineer. Warning signs shall be used to alert motorists of the presence of the steel plates. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 5 - 1 Packet Pg. 416 7.1.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r 0 N N t CD N N N C d E N N U) L .N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 417 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 6 - STRUCTURES OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 6-02 CONCRETE STRUCTURES Supplement this section with the following: 6-02.3(1) Classification of Structural Concrete Class 3000 concrete, minimum 5 1/2 sack (94 pound sacks) mix, shall be used for all concrete work, including sidewalks, curb and gutter, curbs, retaining walls, and small structures. 6-02.3(6)A Weather and Temperature Limits to Protect Concrete A clear, not white, curing compound shall be brushed or sprayed on all exposed concrete immediately after the finishing work. Other protective measures for weather constraints are still required, including protection from excessive hot and cold temperatures (including wind chill). 6-02.3(12) Construction Joints Construction or "dummy" joints shall consist of a tooled 1/4- inch joint into the concrete pour and shall be placed at 10-foot intervals. All work shall be perpendicular and straight. 6-02.3(13) Expansion/Contraction Joints The following requirements apply to all curb, curb and gutter, and sidewalk work. Full depth expansion joints, consisting of 1/2-inch thick premolded material (AASHO M213), shall be placed perpendicularly when abutting to existing improvements at each side of driveway cuts and at a maximum spacing of ten feet. Curb and gutter installations will require an additional 2-inch cut or the installation of a 1-inch by 4-inch wedge into the heel of the pour. All work shall be perpendicular and straight. 6-02.3(14) Finishing Concrete Surfaces The finished improvements shall be true to grade, straight with smooth transitions or curves. Grade checked with a ten -foot straight edge placed anywhere on the slab in any direction and shall not deviate more than 1/8 inch, and alignment shall not vary more than 1/4 inch. The finish shall be a light broom finish as approved by the Engineer in 1-05.6 Inspections. The City will not accept finishes that are non -uniform, overworked, discolored, spalling, damaged by weather, or where a cement layer has formed. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 6 - 1 Packet Pg. 418 7.1.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r 0 N N t CD N N N C d E N N U) L .N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 419 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 7 - DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, STORM SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, WATER MAINS AND CONDUITS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 7-04 STORM SEWERS Supplement this section with the following: 7-04.2 Materials See approved material listings MM-1 through MM-4 as contained in City of Edmonds Material Modifications, Divisions 7, 8 and 9. 7-04.3(1) Cleaning and Testing All pipes shall be tested for exfiltration. 7-04.3(3) Add: Backfillin,g Storm Sewer Trenches Storm sewer pipes shall be bedded and backfilled as specified in Section 2-09. 7-05 MANHOLES, INLETS, CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS Supplement this section with the following: 7-05.3(5) Connection to Existing Line, Catch Basin, Curb Inlet or Manhole (New Section) Where shown on the plans, new stormwater pipes shall be connected to existing lines, catch basins, curb inlets and/or manholes. The Contractor shall not tap directly into stormwater main pipes but shall install a structure to make said connection. The Contractor shall be required to core drill into the structure, shape the new pipe to fit, and regrout the opening in a workmanlike manner. Where directed by the Engineer or where shown on the plans, additional structure channeling may be required. 7-08 GENERAL PIPE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS Supplement this section with the following: 7-08.3(1)C Beddingthe he Pipe Pipe bedding for PVC pipe shall be placed to a depth of 6" below the bottom of the pipe and extending up 6" above the crown on all pipes. The hand -placed bedding around the pipe and to a point 6 inches above the crown shall be rammed and tamped by use of shovels or other approved hand held tools so as to provide firm and uniform support over the full length of all pipes. All other requirements for pipe bedding shall be per Section 9.03. Pipe bedding shall be considered incidental to the unit price for all pipe and no further compensation shall be made. 7-09 WATER MAINS Supplement this section with the following: 7-09.2 Materials See approved material listings MM-1 through MM-4 as contained in City of Edmonds Material Modifications, Division 7, 8 and 9. 7-09.3(11) Compaction of Backfill See 1-06.2(1) Samples and Tests. 7-12 VALVES FOR WATER MAINS Supplement this section with thefollowing: See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4 7-14 HYDRANTS Supplement this section with the following: See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4. 7-15 SERVICE CONNECTIONS Supplement this section with the following: Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 1 Packet Pg. 420 7.1.a See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4. 7-17 SANITARY SEWERS Supplement this section with the following: 7-17.2 Materials See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4. 7-17.3(1) Protection of Existing Sewerage Facilities When extending an existing sewer, the downstream system shall be protected from construction debris by placing a screen or trap in the first existing manhole downstream of the connection. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to maintain this screen or trap until the new system is placed in service and then to remove it. Any construction debris which enters the existing downstream system shall be removed by the Contractor at his expense, and to the satisfaction of the Engineer. When the first manhole is set, the outlet shall be plugged until acceptance by the Engineer. 7-17.3(2)A General See Section 1-05.4. 7-17.3(2)E Low Pressure Air Test for Sanitary Sewers Construct of Air Permeable Materials Section 7-17.3(2)E is supplemented by adding the following: When air permeable pipe is subjected to a low-pressure air test, all of the provisions of Section 7- 17.3(2) shall apply, except that the time in seconds for the pressure drop shall be equal to or greater than the required time as shown in the table below: Time in Seconds for Pressure Drop Pipe Length (ft) Pipe Dia. (in) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 4 5 9 14 18 22 27 31 36 40 45 6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 85 85 8 18 36 54 71 89 107 114 114 114 114 10 28 56 84 111 139 142 142 142 143 159 12 40 80 120 160 170 170 170 183 206 228 15 63 125 188 213 213 214 250 286 320 360 18 90 180 255 255 257 310 360 410 460 520 21 123 245 298 298 350 420 490 560 630 700 24 160 320 340 370 460 550 640 730 830 920 27 203 390 390 460 580 700 810 930 1040 1160 30 250 430 430 570 720 860 1000 1140 1290 1430 All time values listed in the table are in seconds. If a section to be tested includes more than one pipe size, the total time required can be found by adding the time values for each size of pipe and its corresponding length. Pipe over 30 inches in diameter shall be tested one joint at a time in accordance with ASTM C 1103 7-17.3(2)F Low Pressure Air Test for Sanitary Sewers Constructed of Non Air Permeable Materials Delete this section and replace it with the following: When non air permeable pipe is subjected to a low-pressure air test, all of the provisions of Section 7-17.3(2)E shall apply, except that the time in seconds for the pressure drop shall be equal to or greater than four times the time shown in the table listed in Section 7-17.3(2)E. Pipe over 30 inches in diameter shall be tested one joint at a time in accordance with ASTM C 1103. Reaches of thermoplastic pipe containing no joints shall be exempt from testing requirements. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 2 Packet Pg. 421 7.1.a 7-17.3(2)H Television Inspection Section 7-17.3(2)H is supplemented by adding the following: Before final acceptance, the Inspector shall require all sanitary sewer lines to be inspected by the use of a television camera, utilizing Contracting Agency's approved private inspection services. After completion of the following, authorization from the Contracting Agency shall be required before the Contractor can perform the initial television camera work: 1. The acceptable placement of applicable pipe, ballast, bedding, and backfill material. 2. The acceptable completion of all applicable channels and grout work. 3. The acceptable debris removal, cleaning, and flushing of all applicable pipes and structures. The television inspection requirements shall include the provisions of- 1 A color closed circuit television (CCTV) camera with a pan and tilt capacity in order to view all main lines, lateral lines, and structures including channels. CCTV equipment shall include television cameras, a television monitor, cables, power sources, and other equipment. Focal distance shall be adjustable through a range from 150 millimeters (6 inches) to infinity. The CCTV equipment shall include a distance measuring instrument (DMI) to measure the horizontal distance traveled by the camera. The DMI readout shall appear continuously on the videotape produced by the inspection and shall be accurate to less than 1 percent error over the length of the section of pipeline being inspected. For storm or sanitary sewers, the length is measured from the centerline of the manhole or catch basin to the centerline of the next manhole or catch basin. The CCTV inspection system shall be performed utilizing one of the following video camera systems: a. Remote -focus stationary lens cameras; b. Rotating lens cameras; or c. Pan -and -tilt cameras. 2. The camera and television monitor shall produce a minimum of 14 lines per millimeter (350 lines -per -inch) resolution. The video camera shall be mounted on a skid, floatable raft system, or transporter based on the conditions of the pipeline to be televised. Telephones, radios, or other suitable means of communication shall be utilized to ensure communication exists between members of the crew. A description of the system to be utilized shall be included with the submittal package 3. Lateral CCTV inspections shall be completed to the right -of way or as directed by the Engineer 4. A dye solution to be introduced in sufficient quantity to travel from the structure that is the highest point of inspection to the downstream terminus of the inspection limits. Red or purple dye shall be used for PVC pipe and green dye for ductile iron, HDPE and concrete pipe. 5. A one -inch reference ball to be mounted to the camera in order to drag along the bottom of the pipe during the entire inspection procedure. 6. Linear measure references to be measured from the center of the beginning structure to the center of the next inline structure and include the direction of flow. The locations of lateral pipes and all distinctive pipe conditions shall be referenced to the centerline of the beginning structure. All structure references shall utilize the designated structure reference numbers shown on the plans. The following television inspection information shall be provided to the Contracting Agency: 1. A clear DVD record of both video and audio in Windows Media Player format, which encompasses the limits of the inspection area and including all reference data as described herein. 2. A written report shall be provided corresponding to the inspection record and including all reference data as described herein. The report shall consist of a written narrative of all distinctive pipe conditions including ponding areas in excess of tt/4 inch. 7-17.3(2)I Sewer Line Connections Unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, all connections of lateral sewers to new ductile iron pipe or existing mains shall be made through a cast iron saddle secured to the sewer main with stainless steel bands. The main shall be core drilled. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 3 Packet Pg. 422 7.1.a Connections to concrete manholes shall be core drilled, and shall have an "O" ring rubber gasket meeting ASTM C-478 in a manhole coupling equal to the Johns -Manville asbestos -cement collar, or use a conical type flexible seal equal to Kor-N-Seal. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 4 Packet Pg. 423 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 9 - MATERIALS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: 9-03 AGGREGATES Supplement this section with the following: 9-03.16 Bedding Materials A. Rigid Pipe Bedding material for rigid pipe shall be free from wood waste, organic material and other extraneous or objectionable materials. Bedding material shall conform to the following gradations when tested in accordance with ASTM D422. Maximum particle size for ductile iron pipe shall be 1-1/2 inches. 1. Base Material Select: Selected excavated material for pipe base shall not contain particles larger than 5/8 inches Import: Imported base material shall be clean granular sand or sand and gravel mix conforming to the following gradation: Passing 3/4 inch square opening 100% Passing 3/8 inch square opening 95% - 100% Passing U.S. #8 sieve 0% - 10% Passing U.S. #200 sieve 0% - 3% Sand equivalent 35 min. 2. Pine Zone Pipe zone material shall be crushed, processed or naturally occurring granular material or pea gravel, conforming to the following gradation: Passing 3/4 inch square opening 100% Passing 3/8 inch square opening 95% - 100% Passing U.S. #8 sieve 0% - 10% Passing U.S. #200 sieve 0% - 3% Sand equivalent 35 min. B. Thermoplastic Pipe Bedding material for thermoplastic pipe shall be free from wood waste, organic material and other extraneous or objectionable materials. Bedding material shall conform to the following gradations when tested in accordance with ASTM D422. Pipe zone material shall be crushed, processed or naturally occurring granular material or pea gravel conforming to the following gradation: Passing 3/4 inch square opening 100% Passing 3/8 inch square opening 95% - 100% Passing U.S. #8 sieve 0% - 10% Passing U.S. #200 sieve 0% - 3% Sand equivalent 35 min. 9-03.19 Bank Run Gravel for Trench Backfill All backfill material shall be free from wood waste, organic material and other extraneous objectionable materials. Material shall be uniformly graded from coarse to fine and conform to the following gradation when tested in accordance with ASTM D422: 1. Select Maximum particle size for this material shall be 2'/2 inches. 2. Import Particle size for this material shall be 11/4 ' minus CSBC. Division 9 - 1 Updated April24, 2012 Packet Pg. 424 7.1.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r 0 N N t CD N N N C d E N N U) L .N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 425 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS DIVISIONS 7,8 AND 9 CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO MATERIALS IN DIVISIONS 7,8 AND 9 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: The following material specifications shall clarify, supplement and supersede where applicable the WSDOT Standard Specifications. MATERIALS A. City of Edmonds approved materials: * approved only when shown in the plan, proposal, or Special Provisions. 1. WATER SYSTEMS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Pipe Class 52 ductile iron (AWWA C151) (or US Pipe, American, Pacific class as noted onplans) push on joint pipe States Pipe Fittings (MJ/Flanged) Cement lined ductile iron AWWA C 153 /C110 Nuts, bolts (MJ Fitting AWWA C111 Accessories Couplings Long Body Ductile Iron, MJ, AWWA C153 Restrained joints for pipe Locking Gasket US Pipe, American, Pacific (locking gasket) States Restrained joints for pipe Mega -Lug Series 1100HD EBAA mechanical AWWA CI I I Uni-Flan a Series 1490 Ford Restrained joints for MJ fittings Mega -Lug Series 1100 EBAA AWWA C111 One-Lok D Slide Sigma Uni-Flange Series 1400 Ford StarGrip series 3000 Star Pipe Romagrip Romac Joint lubricant ANSI/NSF Standard 61 Gate valves, resilient wedge AVK Series 45/65 American AVK Co. (12" & smaller, AWWA C 509 Kennedy KS-RW Kennedy Valve or AWWA C 515) Series 2500 AFC American Flow Control Clow 2639 Clow Mueller 2300 Mueller Co. Butterfly valves (AWWA C Groundhog Pratt 504) Series 4500 Kennedy Valve Lineseal III Mueller Co. Tapping sleeve 18-8 Type 304 stainless steel with CF8 cast stainless steel flanged end with ANSI 150 pound drilling and tapping valve Romac, JCM Valve boxes Seattle Style 940 Olympic Foundry Inc. Fire hydrants meeting AWWA AVK Series 2780 American AVK Co. C502 w 4" Storz Adapter Centurion, Super Mueller Co. Reliant 929 M&H Medallion Clow Pacer Waterous Combination air relief/vacuum Series 140c APCO relief valve (ARV) AWWA Model 202c Val-Matic C512 Model U1-20 Crispin Automatic Control Valve AWWA C530 Cla-Val Valve Insertion EZ2 System Advanced Valve Technologies Material Mod 7-9 - 20161213.doex MM-1 Revised January 2015 Packet Pg. 426 7.1.a Cross Connection Assemblies Cross Connection Assemblies Current Washington State approved listing Flex Couplings Ductile Iron Bolted Mueller, Romac, Ford, Smith Blair Water Services and Connections MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Copper pipe Soft, type K, ASTM B 88 Streamline, Cerro Service Saddle - 2" IP saddle 317 Series Smith Blair with stainless steel straps Model 202S Romac Model FS202 Ford DR2S Mueller Co. Service Saddle — 1" CC saddles Model 101 s Romac with stainless steel straps Model FS101 Ford (up to 12" main) 315 Series Smith Blair DR1S Muller Co. Ball Corp. stops 1" CCxCTS FB1000 Ford comp. AWWA C800 B-25008 Mueller Co. 4701-BQ A.Y. McDonald Ball Corp. stops 2" IP FB 500 Ford B-2969 Mueller Co. 3131 A.Y. McDonald Ball Curb stops 1" MIPxCTS B-84-444Q Ford B25122 Mueller Co. 6107Q A.Y. McDonald Fittings - copper 110 Compression Mueller ANSI AWWA C800 C series quik joint Ford 4758-Q A.Y. McDonald Meter Setters: • New 1" Ford VBH74-15W-11-44 Ford A.Y. McDonald 20-415-WCDD44 A.Y. McDonald • Replace Exist 1" Ford VB74-15W-11-44 Ford A.Y. McDonald 20-415-WXDD44 A.Y. McDonald Meter Setters: • New 2" Ford VBH87-12HB-1177 Ford • Replace Exist 2" Ford VBB87-12HB-1177 Ford 1" Meter boxes (Unpaved 1324x12 MSBCF with Ductile Iron Cover Carson Areas) with Cast Iron Reader Door 1" Meter boxes (Paved Areas & A6001946PCX12 Box with A6001969RCI Armorcast Driveways) Cover with Hinged Reader Lid 2" Meter boxes Box: A6001641PCX18 Armorcast Lid: A6001947TRCI-H7 2. SEWER SYSTEM (sewer pipe) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Pie PVC, SDR 35, ASTM D3034 Fittings and sewer service Same material as pipe PVC sand collars Manholes Precast ASTM C478, 48" min. at bottom. top concentric to 24" opening Material Mod 7-9 - 20161213.doex MM-2 Revised January 2015 Packet Pg. 427 7.1.a Manhole steps Polypropylene, ASTM D-4101 material Lane, MA Industries over ASTM A-615, grade 60 steel reinforcing bar, step to comply with ASTM C-478 Frames and covers ASTM A48, class 35, cast iron, East Jordan Ironworks bituminous coated, Transition couplings Longitudinally bolted coupling with Romac, Dresser, Rockwell asketed joints 3. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Pipe *Concrete, reinforced, ASTM C76 or AASHTO M 170 Concrete (non -reinforced) ASTM C14 or AASHTO M86, class 2 Aluminum CMP, AASHTO M196, 16 ga. or as shown on plans, izasketed and coupling banded *Aluminum smooth wall pipe, 16 ga. or as shown on Cascade Culvert, Kaiser plans, recorrugated ends with annular bands and Aluminum gaskets *PVC, SDR 35, ASTM D3034 Ductile iron, class 50 Perma-loc series 46 J.M. Manufacturing Co. HDPE; smooth interior pipe, watertight ADS AASHTO M252, M294 Type S Hancor ASTM D 2321 ASTM D 1248 Type III Category 4 Grade P33 Class C ASTM D 3350 2' Minimum cover under pavement areas Fitting Same as pipe material PVC sand collars Manholes Precast ASTM C478, 48" min. at bottom, flat slab top, 8" min. thickness, 24" opening, Manhole steps Polypropylene, ASTM D-4101 material over ASTM Lane, MA Industries A-615, grade 60 steel reinforcing bar, step to comply with ASTM C-478 Frames and covers ASTM A48, class 35, cast iron, East Jordan Ironworks bituminous coated, Transition couplings Longitudinally bolted coupling with gasketed joints Romac, Dresser, Rockwell B. SUBSTITUTIONS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Provide submittals for substitute materials to the Engineer for approval in accordance with the Special Provisions and the Standard Specifications Material Mod 7-9 - 20161213.docx MM-3 Revised January 2015 Packet Pg. 428 7.1.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r 0 N N t CD N N N C d E N N U) L .N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 429 as}eM diu03 L1,0Z 841 uo fuiJeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) veld W04SAS aa;eM aA1sue49adua03 LL0Z :1uaua4oe11VF city of edmonds - development information WATER SERVICE LINE SPECIFICATIONS 1. DEFINITION: The Water service line is defined as that pipe installed from the water meter to the building. II. MATERIALS Per Section 604.0, Chapter b of the IAPMO/ANSI UPC 1-2003 Uniform Plumbing Code and WAC amendment #, the following types of water service line materials are recognized and shall meet the ASTM requirements as outlined in Table 14-iof the above Code: 1. Copper piping no less than type "U. 2. Polyethylene piping with iron pipe O.D. size and ASTM-D2239-SIDR##7-PE3406 markings. 3. Plastic, PVC, CPVC, PEX 4. Galvanized malleable iron., galvanized wrought iron, galvanized steel 5. Asbestos cement, PE, PVC, PEX-AL-PEX or PEX-AL PE water pipe manufactured to recognized standards for water supply outside the building supply distribution can also be used. 6. All materials used in the water supply system, except valves and similar devices, shall be of like material, except where otherwise approved by the City. 7. Per City policy, minimum pipe size from meter to house is I". M. MAMUNGS Piping shall be marked on the material at intervals of not more than 5' for: poly, pvc, and pex, cpvc, plastic pipe, etc. with manufacturer's name, size and pressure rating. The pressure rating shall be a minimum of 160 P.S.I. aa;eM dwOO LLOZ ay; uo 6uiaeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld WGIS (S aa;eM anlsuayaidwoo LLOZ :;uawLJ3e;;y q Cl) 1� a1 a. m M IL IV INSTALLATION 1. The water service pipe line shall be bedded on a firm, undisturbed base that is smoothly graded and free of large materials. If materials for backfill are larger than %2" diameter rock, a proper sandy soil shall be on site to backfill to 2 inches above the water pipe at time of inspection. If soil is disturbed, it shall be compacted to provide a stable base. 2. The pipe depth shall be a minimum of 18 inches from finished grade to top of service pipe and an 18 inch depth at the meter box. 3. When polyethylene pipe or other non traceable pipe is used, it must be buried with 12-gauge solid core tracer wire with vinyl coating. The run must be continuous, grounded at the meter and house and taped every 10 feet to the water pipe. 4. Polyethylene Pipe connections at the meter must be made with brass compression fittings. In addition, brass fittings shall be used to connect sections of pipe together. All connections shall be double -clamped with stainless steel clamps and shall be secured in opposite directions 5. Proper pipe connection fittings to the water meter, for all other material shall be approved by the City prior to connection 5. Piping shall be flushed out and under pressure with no leaks at the time of inspection. 6. The water service line shall not be buried with the sanitary sewer or drainage pipe. a) Minimum horizontal separation between sewer and water shall be 10 feet. b) Minimum vertical separation between sewer and water shall be 18 inches. When the minimum 10 foot separation is not possible, due to lack of space, the waterline shall be placed on a solid shelf excavated at one side of the common trench line 18" above the top of the sewerline and at least 18" from edge of waterline to edge of sewer line (see figure 1 below). If the waterline must cross the sewer, it must be at least 18" above the top of the sewer pipe at all points. V. INSPECTIONS Water service line and all connections shall be inspected prior the backfill and the preceding criteria must be met, or inspection will not be performed. Call the Engineering Inspection line at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326, 24 hours in advance to schedule the required inspection. You may state your preference for morning or afternoon. Approved permit and/or job card must be on site at time of inspection. 2 aa;eM dwOO LLOZ ay; uo 6uPeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld WGIS (S aa;eM aAlsuayaidwoo LLOZ :1uauayoe;;y N M WATER SERVICE WITH LESS THAN 10 FOOT SEPARATION Horizontal Separation Notes (For Parallel Construction) The parallel separation detail on figure 1 refers to side sewers only. Side sewers (gravity or pressure) shall be installed lower than the water service with a minimum vertical clearance of 18" from the bottom of the water service line to the top of the side sewer line. Vertical Separation Notes_ (For Perpendicular Construction) Side sewer lines that must cross water service lines shall be laid below the water lines to provide a separation of at least 18" between the invert of the water pipe and the crown of the sewer, whenever possible. When local conditions prevent this vertical separation, the following construction shall be used: A. Side sewers, passing over or under water lines, shall be: 1. Constructed of water main standard pipe material as shown in the Table. One segment of the maximum standard length of pipe, (but no less than 18' long) shall be used with the pipes centered to maximize joint separation. OR 18" MIN T M a m 4 b a. FIGURE 1 WATER SERVICE PARALLEL TO GRAVITY SEWER WITH LESS THAN 10 FOOT SEPARATION WATER MAIN STANDARD PIPE MATERIAL FOR SEWER LINES TYPE OF PIPE AWWA ASTM STANDARD PIPE JOINT FITTINGS Ductile Iron C 151 & C 104 C l l l C 110 Polyvinyl -Chloride C 900 (D3139 & C 110 F 477) Concrete Cylinder C 303 2. Standard gravity sewer material B. Water lines passing under gravity sewer, in addition, shall be encased in 1 sack mix control density protected by providing: fill (CDF) or in a %" thick continuous steel casing with all voids 1. A vertical separation of at least 18 inches between the pressure -grouted with sand -cement invert of the sewer and the crown of the water line. grout. The length of sewer pipe shall 2• Adequate structural support for the sewers to prevent be centered at the point of crossing so excessive deflection of joints and settling on and the joints will be equidistant and as breaking of the water line. far as possible from the water line. C. Pressure sewers shall only be constructed under water lines The sewer pipe shall be the longest with ductile iron pipe or standard sewer pipe in a steel casing standard length available from the for a distance of at least ten feet on each side of the crossing. manufacturer. 3 I 7.1.a I MOUNT HYDRANT PLUMB PROVIDE 3' MINIMUM CLEARANCE AROUND HYDRANT 1 /2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL 4" MIN-6" MAX 3' x 3' x 3.5" THICK CONCRETE PAD AROUND HYDRANT ° 1 CY 1-1/2" WASHED ROCK. 1' MIN ABOVE DRAIN HOLES AND AROUND HYDRANT TO BOTTOM OF DITCH LINE. COVER TOP AND SIDES WITH MIRAFI 160N OR APPROVED EQUAL. UNDISTURBED EARTH 12"x12"x4" CONC. BLK. HYDRANT CONNECTION PIPE TO BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 52. ANY INTERMEDIATE JOINTS TO BE RESTRAINED NOTES: 4" STORZ ADAPTER 18" MIN-24" MAX ABOVE FINISHED GRADE FINISH GRADE " FL x MJ 6" R.W. GATE VALVE RESTRAINED JOINTS MEGA —LUG OR EQUAL FROM HYDRANT TO VALVE (TYP) DOUBLE SIDED BLUE RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS ALIGN VALVE BOX EA PARALLEL WITH THE WATER LINE IT SERVE ROAD � CAST IRON ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX TEE WITH FLANGED FLANGED CONNECTION CONNECTION FOR HYDRANT VALVE 0 THRUST BLOCK 10 MIL PLASTIC ° BETWEEN BLOCK & TEE 12"x12"x4" I 2" MIN CONC BLK CLEARANC BETWEEN a BLOCKING AND n BOLTS a °;.. a ;..... THRU! " a d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s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 433 I 7.1.a I C I NOTES: • © 0 © I��I u� 0 ;■;rii!.!iiII�■- . ©.. © LOCATION 8 ii!.!ii��l i■�III o ® DRAINFLOOR12 m m ,. 1. VAULT SHALL BE UTILITY VAULT 612—LA WITH TOP SECTION MODIFIED TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF LW HATCH TYPE "HTD-3" 3 LEAF, PART A (48"X108") 2. VALVE INCLUDES: • ISOLATION COCKS • OPEN/CLOSE SPEED CONTROLS • "H" STRAINER • RESTRICTION FITTING • CRD PILOT • EPDXY COATING 2. INSIDE VAULT HEIGHT: 6.5' MIN 3. ACCESS LID BY LW. GUTTER DRAIN SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE SUMP. 4. VAULT HATCH OPENING LOCATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE THAT ANY SITE SPECIFIC ACCESS ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED 5. ALL 3" STEEL PIPE FOR THE PRESSURE RELIEF DISCHARGE LINE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40, SANDBLASTED, EPDXY LINED AND COATED LANE INTERNATIONAC_ POLYPROPYLENE LADDER WITH PULL UP HANDRAIL. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS AND COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ENGINEER. 16 -ACCESS LID OPENING (HINC SIDE) LW HATCH TYPE "HTD-3" 3 LEAF, PART A (48"X108") (H-20 RATING). 1O 2" BRASS BALL VALVE O2 2" THREADED BRASS PIPE O3 2" BRASS 90' BEND 03 PIECE UNION 55 2" THREADED CLA—VAL 9OG-01 BCSYKC W/VALVE POSITION INDICATOR O6 6" DI SPOOL WITH FL X PE LENGTH TO FIT. (5' LENGTH MAXIMUM.) O7 6" DI FL TEE WITH 2" TAPPED BLIND FLANGE SEE COE STD DETAIL 7.2.1 FOR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN SECTION VIEW O8 6" FL STRAINER CLA—VAL MODEL X43H O6" CLA—VAL 9OG-01 BCSYKC W/VALVE POSITION INDICATOR (SEE NOTE #2) EPDXY LINING 10 6" FLANGE COUPLING ADAPTER 11 6" DI FL SPOOL. LENGTH TO FIT 12 6" FL RSGV WITH HAND WHEEL 13 6"x3" DI FL TEE SEE COE DETAIL 7.2.1 FOR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN SECTION VIEW 14 3" FL RSGV WITH HAND WHEEL 15 3"x3"x2" REDUCING RUN TEE WITH 3" CLA—VAL 650A-01 & SIGHT GLASS SEE COE STD DETAIL 7.2.1 FOR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN SECTION VIEW 16 3" STEEL DISCHARGE PIPE & 90' BEND, FIELD LOCATE PER ENGINEER 17 MEGA —LUG MID SPAN RESTRAINT AND THRUST BLOCK AND VAULT SEAL SEE COE STD DETAIL E7.2.2 18 MIPxFIP 1-1/4" BALL VALVE ® BOTTOM OF STRAINER CITY OF EDMONDS 6" PRV (PLAN VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 434 7.1 a DRAIN TO SUMP OR CATCH BASIN FINISHED GRADE �St. 189v M VAULT OPENING AND LID FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SEE COE STD DTL E7.2 iv PAINT PIPE ABOVE GROUND YELLOW 1" COMBINATION A.R.V. CRISPIN UL10 OR EQUAL 1" BRASS TEE W/1 "X1 /4" BUSHING- 1 " IP BALL CORP PRESSURE 1" BRASS TEE GAUGE 3/4" HOSE BIB 1/4" BALL VALVE SIGHT GLASS 1/4" BALL VALVE n 1/4" TEE 1" BALL CORP— Z' 6I rill -IC ' liii_ II d SIGHT GLASS 15 BEEHIVE STRAINER 3" OPE S PATTER f RETURN o BEND s ALL BRASS PIPE 1 O TEE -j `�nJ 6" MIN s ADJUSTABLE SEE COE STD o SUPPORTS TWO ON DTL E7.2.2 SUMP DRAIN EACH SIDE OF PRV .a • � d. f U 4. .. .e a n s S �Kl\\\ 2" PVC DRAIN 5/8" MINUS C.S.T.C. COMPACTED %\\1-1 2" MINUS WASHED TO 95% MAX. DENSITY 2'��/�� GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR UNDISTURBED EARTH 2' DRYWELLS PER WSDOT 9-03.12(5) NOTES: SEE STANDARD DETAIL E7.2 FOR NOTE CALL OUTS. REVISION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS OCTOBER 2015 6" PRV (SECTION VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH Packet Pg. 435 I 7.1.a I 6" MINA PROFILE VIEW CALPICO VAULT SEAL. SEE TABLE BELOW FOR PIPE DIAMETER, CORING DIAMETER AND # OF VAULT SEAL LINKS. BOLTS MUST BE TIGHTENED FROM THE INSIDE OF THE VAULT TO ALLOW FOR MAINTENANCE OF LINK SEAL. A IRON #1100 SDB MEGALUG -SPAN RESTRAINT; POLYWRAP DR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCREI T IN PLACE 3,000 PSI CONCRE UST BLOCK (2'Wx2'Hx0.5' MIN) _..JSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE PER WSDOT STD. SPEC. 9-03.9(3) COMPACT TO 95% MAX DENSITY PER ASTM -1557 PIPE DIAMETER A CORE DRILL DIAMETER B CALPICO CSL# QTY OF CALPICO CSL 3" 6" 32 5 4" 8" 40 5 6" loll 40 7 8" 12" 40 9 CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PLAN VIEW VAULT THRUST BLOCK & VAULT SEAL REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t l g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr d'3R I 7.1.a I 1 - 2" BRASS 90' BEND 1 - 2" BRASS 90' ST ELL 4"x4" CONCRETE MARKER POST PAINTED YELLOW WITH BLACK STENCILED DISTANCE AND DIRECTION TO VALVE 3/8" STEEL DIAMOND PLATE COVER FOG-TITE METER SEAL CO. NO. 2 FINAL GRADE 2" BRASS UNION TWO 17"x28" CONCRETE METER 2"X4" BRASS BOXES STACKED ON EACH OTHER NIPPLE 2" BRASS 90' 2" FIPxFIP RSGV ST. ELL 2" TYPE 'K' COPPER PIPE PROVIDE CONTINUOUS UPWARD SLOPE FROM MAIN TO AIR -VAC �r BBRASSRASS 990'S 2"ELLLL WATER MAIN 2" BRASS BEEHIVE q o STRAINER E � PAINT PIPE R N ABOVE GROUND YELLOW WI f. d 2" BRASS PIPE 2" MIPxCTS GRIP :. 2" MIP BALL CORP .,. FORD FB 500-7 OR APPROVED EQUAL 2" IP TAP DOUBLE STRAP SERVICE SADDLE ROMAC 202S OR APPROVED EQUAL CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (FIELD LOCTE) NEXT TOIST PROPERTYELINE .2" BRASS 90' ELL 2" BRASS 90' ST ELL 2" COMBINATION AIR/VAC VALVE CRISPIN UL20 OR APPROVED EQUAL WASHED GRAVEL PASSING 1-1/2" AND RETAINED ON Y4" MESH 2" BRASS 90' ST. ELL 2"x6" BRASS NIPPLE 4"x4"x8" CONCRETE BRICKS TO BEARING SOIL ARV ASSEMBLY REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I - parkn4 d'37 I 7.1.a I 2" IP TAP DOUBLE STRAP SERVICE SADDLE EQUAL TO ROMAC 202S FINAL GRADE 4 a 940 STYLE VALVE BOX ASSY. OR EQUAL WATER MAIN 2 x 3" THREADED BRASS NIPPLE 2" RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVE FIPT 1730x12 ARMORCAST A6001640PCx12 WITH A6001947T ONE PIECE COVER 2" PVC THREADED PLUG z 2" BRASS 45' BEND ammml CAST IRON VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY 2" THREADED BRASS PIPE (CUT TO LENGTH) 1 — 2" BRASS ST. ELL 1 — 2" BRASS 90' ELL d b ° 2 x 3" THREADED BRASS NIPPLE 4"x4"x8" CONC. BRICK (TO BEARING SOIL) ab NOTE: PLACE BLOW —OFF ASSY. WITHIN 3' OF END OF MAIN CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY s f 1 B 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L Packet r_ . 438 I 7.1.a I NOTE: BACK SIDE OF METER BOX SHALL BE SET AT THE PROPERTY LINE. METER BOXES SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN DRIVEWAY AREAS. I r J WATER MATERIAL LIST: R.O.W. FINISHED GRADE - -�METER SUPPLIED BY CITY O BALL VALVE----- �I I G DIRECTION OF FLOW A � J PROPERTY LINE O OA ALL 1" SERVICES TO BE TYPE "K" SOFT COPPER TUBING OB 1 " BALL CORP. STOP WITH CC THREAD INLET AND COPPER (CTS) GRIP OUTLET (FORD OR MUELLER) OC DUAL PURPOSE UNION OD MIPT X CTS GRIP BALL VALVE CURB STOP EQUAL TO FORD B84-444Q FOR 1 " OWHEN REPLACING EXISTING SERVICES: 1 " METER SETTER WITH ANGLE BALL METER VALVE 15" HIGH WITH DUAL E PURPOSE UNIONS ON INLET AND OUTLET, HORIZONTAL IN HORIZONTAL OUTLET, EQUAL TO FORD VB74-15W-11-44 WHEN PLACING NEW PLACING NEW SERVICES: USE SAME AS ABOVE AND ADD A SINGLE CHECK, EQUAL TO FORD VBH74-15W-11-4 O 1" CC TAP SERVICE SADDLE EQUAL TO ROMAC 101S O CARSON 1324 MSBCF WITH DUCTILE IRON COVER AND CAST IRON READER DOOR O FOR VACANT LOT (FUTURE USE) LOCATION MARKED WITH PAINTED 2" X 4" STAKE WITH "WATER" STENCILED ON IT OI 14 GA. VINYL COATED WIRE TRACER (TAPED TO PLASTIC PIPE EVERY 10') TO BE GROUNDED AT METER AND HOUSE OJ SCHEDULE 40 3/4" OR 1' PLUG, REMOVE WHEN CONNECTION IS MADE TO CUSTOMER LINE KO WATER SERVICE TO HOUSE, INSTALLED BY OWNER/CONTRACTOR OPROPERTY OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING 3/4" OR 1" METER THROUGH THE CITY CITY WILL SUPPLY METER AFTER PURCHASE IF USING 3/4" METER, CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE REDUCERS OBACK SIDE OF METER BOX SHALL BE SET AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. METER BOXES SHALL NOT BE SET IN DRIVEWAY AREAS UNLESS TRAFFIC RATED BOX IS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT "St. 18yv 1" WATER SERVICE FOR 3/4" OR 1 " METER INSTALLATION APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD DETAIL Packet Pg. 439 I 7.1.a I GROUND/ROADWAY/FINISH GRADE PROPERTY O GROUND/ROADWAY LINE i� II � II Oil 0 I II II II II II N ILI ' TO MAIN SHALL BE ANGLED AND NOT EXCEED 22 DEGREES MATERIAL LIST: OA 2" (IP TAP) DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE EQUAL TO ROMAC STYLE 202'S OB 2" BRASS IP BALL CORP OC 2 — 2" BRASS STREET ELLS FOR SWING JOINT OD COPPER TYPE K SOFT PIPE (2") OE 2" MIPT X CTS GRIP FITTING OF 2" FIPT X CTS GRIP FITTING OG BACK SIDE OF METER BOX SHALL BE SET AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. METER BOXES SHALL NOT BE SET IN DRIVEWAY AREAS UNLESS TRAFFIC RATED BOX IS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. ()2" BRASS ST ELL OI METER SPACER TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SPACER MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8 — 1 /4" HOLES DRILLED IN SPACER BODY. NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING 1-1/2" OR 2" METER THROUGH THE CITY. THE CITY WILL SUPPLY METER AFTER PURCHASE FOR CONTRACTOR INSTALL. IF 1-1/2" METER IS USED CONTRACTOR WILL SUPPLY REDUCERS TO CONNECT METER. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OJ WHEN REPLACING EXISTING SERVICES: EQUAL TO FORD VBB87-12HB-1177 WHEN PLACING NEW SERVICES (HIGH BYPASS): EQUAL TO FORD VBH87-12HB-1177 OK METER BOX ARMORCAST A6001640PCX18, WITH ARMORCAST LID A6001947TRC1—H7 OR APPROVED EQUAL STRAIGHT WALL POLYMER BOX (NO MOUSEHOLES) WITH 20K COVER WITH HINGED Cl READER OL 2" TYPE "K" HARD COPPER OM SCHEDULE 40 2" PVC CAP OR PLUG REMOVED WHEN CONNECTION MADE TO CUSTOMER ON 4"x4"x8" CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORTS OO 2" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE (FIP x FIP) WITH 2" AWWA OPERATING NUT OP 2 PIECE VALVE BOX — TOP SECTION TO BE RICH 940 STYLE 18" WITH REGULAR BASE SECTION LENGTH TO FIT OQ WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING INSTALLED AND CONNECTED TO SERVICE BY OWNER/CONTRACTOR 2" WATER SERVICE FOR 1-1/2 55 OR 2" METER INSTALLATION REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 440 I 7.1.a I MATERIAL LIST (ALL SIZES ARE SAME AS METER UNLESS OTHERWISE LISTED) O1 1—MECHANICAL LONG BODY CPLG O2-4"x3" REDUCER, MJ & 3' SPOOL FOR 3" SERVICE ONLY O3 1—TEE, MJxFL O4 1—GATE VALVE, FLxMJ (W/VALVE BOX & COVER) O5 3—DI PIPE, PE, LENGTH TO FIT O6 2-90' BEND, MJ O7 2—DI PIPE, PExFL LENGTH TO FIT O 1—EPDXY COATED SERVICE SADDLE, FORD FS202 (TAP POINTED UP AT 12—O'CLOCK) OR EQUAL, 1—CORP STOP, MIPT, FORD FLOW O FB500-7 OR APPROVED EQUAL, WITH 2" FIPTx2" MNST ADAPTER AND CAP (2-1/2" FNST) O9 2—GATE VALVES, FL WITH HAND WHEEL 10 SENSUS OMNI C2 METER W/INTERNAL STRAINER, W/ELECTRONIC RESOLUTION (100'S OF CUBIC FEET FOR 3" METER, 500 CUBIC FEET FOR 4-6" METER) 1 1 1—DI ADAPTER FL.xPE, LENGTH TO FIT 12 2—FLANGED COUPLING ADAPTER, EQUAL TO ROMAC FCG 13 MEGA —LUG MID —SPAN RESTRAINT AND THRUST BLOCK & VAULT SEAL. SEE COE STD DETAIL E7.2.2 O 14 PRECAST CONCRETE VAULT BY UTILITY VAULT CO (SEE TABLE FOR MODEL #) W/TWO DIAMOND PLATE DOORS RATED FOR HS-30 LOADING 15 1—FORD MIPT BALL CORP WITH THREADED END CAP SIZED TO FIT OMNI C2 TESTPORT C SEE TABLE" 16 1—OS & Y GATE VALVE, FL WITH HAND WHEEL TR/PL SENSOR (TO MOUNT IN VAULT 17 ACCESS DOOR) C 18 2—ADJUSTABLE STANCHION BOLTED TO FLOOR 19 LANE INTERNATIONAL POLYPROPYLENE LADDER WITH PULL UP HANDRAIL. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS AND COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ENGINEER. 20 1—TEE, FL CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT a PAVED AREAS GRADE TO DRAIN 3" FROM TOP OF VAULT TO FINISHED GRADE IN PLANTER OR UNPAVED AREAS LW HATCH WITH GAS TIGHT SEAL (SEE NOTE 5 ON E7.6.213) C DRAIN (6" MIN DIA) WITH WIRE MESH RODENT SCREEN, SLOPE TO DAYLIGHT OR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ELEVATION VIEW 8" (SEE NOTE 5 ON E7.6.213) / - 1 SEE NOTE 7 2" ON E7.6.2B HATCH CLEAR OPENING Z 03" = J Qw =z 2' MIN F-2' MIN w PLAN VIEW 3", 499 9 6" WATER SERVICE & METER n PRIVATE PLUMBING J REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9 " I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet - I Pr441 I 7.1.a I NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIALS, INCLUDING METER SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. ALL PIPE & FITTINGS 3" & LARGER SHALL BE CEMENT LINED D.I.P. CL 52. 3. TEE WITH (3) GATE VALVES IS REQUIRED AT DISTRIBUTION MAIN. 4. VAULTS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN AREAS SUBJECT TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. 5. VAULT COVER SHALL INCLUDE TWO LOCKING ALUMINUM LW TYPE HATCH DOORS (PART NO. HHD-1 D (36"x72") DOORS SHALL HAVE SLIP RESISTANT TREATMENT. DOORS SHALL BE CAST IN COVER WITH 8" SPECIAL OFFSET FROM VAULT WALL, AS SHOWN. COVER TO READ "WATER". 6. PROVIDE 24" CLEARANCE BETWEEN VAULT FLOOR & BOTTOM OF COMPOUND METER. WHERE ELEVATION OF VAULT FLOOR IS TOO LOW TO DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT OR TO STORM SYSTEM, THIS CLEARANCE CAN BE REDUCED TO A MINIMUM OF 12". SUBSTITUTION OF A SHORTER VAULT TO ALLOW FLOOR TO DRAIN BY GRAVITY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. SUBSTITUTE VAULTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 3" 575—LA WITH 57TL-2-332P COVER (WITH SPECIAL OFFSET+LW ALUMINUM HATCH). 4" 675—WA WITH 675—TW-2-332P COVER (WITH SPECIAL OFFSET+LW ALUMINUM HATCH). 7. PROVIDE 2-1/4" DIAMETER OPENING IN ALUMINUM DOOR FOR TR/PL SENSOR. 8. ALL FITTINGS OUTSIDE VAULT SHALL INCLUDE THRUST BLOCKING AND JOINT RESTRAINT DEVICES (MEGALUGS OR APPROVED EQUAL). 9. PIPE, FITTINGS, AND VALVES OUTSIDE VAULT SHALL BE 4" FOR 3" SERVICE INSTALLATIONS. 10. A MINIMUM 2 FEET OF LEVEL UNOBSTRUCTED AREA IS REQUIRED AROUND HATCHES. METER SIZE*** MAIN SIZE OUT OF VAULT BYPASS R STOP FOR FLUSH PORT SIZE MIN. CLEARANCES VAULT MODEL VAULT COVER * (W/SPECIAL OFFSET) M. BALL CORP** A B C D 3" 4"D.I. 4" D.I. 2" 10" 16" 2'-8" 6" 577—LA 57TL-2-332P FB500-4 4" 4"D.I. 4" D.I. 2" 12" 16" 2'-8" 6" 676—WA 676—TW-2-332P FB500-6 6" 6"D.I. 6" D.I. 2" 12" 16" 3'-2" 6" 4484-1-A 4484—TL2-332P FB500-6 * COVER MODIFIED PER NOTE 5 ** MIPT CORP PER KEYED NOTE 15 ***VALVE, PIPE & FITTINGS INSIDE VAULT SHALL MATCH METER SIZE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3", 4", 6" WATER SERVICE & METER NOTES REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I pI — aPrr dd7 I 7.1.a I VERTICAL ` INSTALLATION ' [--3" (TYP) O ' TOP VIEW NO HIGHER THAN — EXIST GROUND 5' TO CENTER OF f #2 SHUT OFF VALVE TEST COCKS WITH PLUGS RESILIENT SEATED (4 REQ'D) SHUTOFF VALVES 3" (TYP) x (2 REQ'D) x CO � =_i ® 0 2 UNIONS REQ'D z 2 UNIONS REQ'D J x PLASTIC OR CEMENT CO METER BOX NOTES: SIDE VIEW 1. APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL WITH GROUND IV H 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE GRAVEL 3. TEST COCKS TO EITHER FACE OUTWARDS OR UPWARDS FROM ASSEMBLY (12" MIN) 4. ALL TEST COCKS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH PVC PLUGS 5. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACK FLOW PREVENTER 6. THE DCVA CAN BE INSTALLED ABOVE OR BELOW THE GROUND PROVIDED ALL CLEARANCES ARE MET 7. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING 8. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS 9 THE BACK FLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY MUST BE A WASHINGTON STATE APPROVED MODEL 1 0-1 n 10. IF INSTALLED INSIDE A BUILDING THE DCVA SHALL BE INSTALLED NO HIGHER THAN 5 FEET FROM 12" MIN FLOOR TO C/L OF ASSY AND A MIN OF 12 INCHES FROM FLOOR TO BOTTOM OF ASSY FROM FL00 IF INSTALLED IN A VERTICAL CONFIGURATION, ASSY MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM FLOOR, AND NO HIGHER THAN 5 FEET FROM FLOOR TO C/L OF #2 SHUT OFF VALVE *ONLY ASSY WITH APPROVAL FROM WADOH MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY A WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. THE TEST REPORT MUST BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS WATER DIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS RESIDENTIAL DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY PUBLIC WORKS (DCVA) DEPARTMENT (STANDARD DCVA 2" & SMALLER) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 443 I 7.1.a I REFER TO CHART Ti 4" HOSE CONNECTION W/ STORZ FITTING CHECK (AS REQ'D BY FIRE DEPT) VALVE �--6" (TYP) 18" MIN '' PIV — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ' 18" MAX CONNECTION PRE —ASSEMBLED, DOH STATE' 18" MIN AS REQUIRED APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK I : MEGA LUG MID SPAN BY FIRE I DETECTOR VALVE ASSEMBLY I �' RESTRAINT AND THRUST MARSHAL FLxFL TEE BLOCK AND VAULT SEAL I SEE COE STD DTL E7.2.2 FLOW [17Im o 1 9 (TYP) i H i ®® EXTEND �' MEGALUGS I A LADDER OUT I FLANGED FITTING I z D AS REQUIREDI COUPLING ALL FOR EASY ,� ADAPTER PENETRATIONS ' I ° ACCESS I , SHALL BE CORE L°° — — — — — — — — — DRILLED AND % MADE WATER TIGHT''' USING SHRINK LSENSUS SR2 W/TRPL REMOTE READ LADDER PER APWA GROUT WITH THE TRPL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON STD PLAN #41 WATER SEAL HATCH CLOSE TO HINGE ALIGN WITH HATCH DOUBLE LEAF LID (MODEL—L.W. HATCH) OPENING TO BE LOCATED WITHIN 18" OF INSIDE VAULT WALL FOR EASIER LADDER ACCESS EXTERIOR PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1. ACCESSES BY L.W. HATCH: TYPE "D" (HD-10 PEDESTRIAN LOAD; H-30 TRAFFIC LOAD) WITH SIDE OUTLET GUTTER DRAIN. 2. DCDA MUST BE TESTED BY A CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. 3. ALL TEST COCKS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH PCV PLUGS. 4. A CITY APPROVED VALVE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SUPPLY MAIN AND THE VAULT. 5. SEE COE STD DTLS E7.19 AND E7.20 FOR DCDA LOCATION AND CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS. VAULT SIZES METER SIZE AND TYPE APPROXIMATE EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS MINIMUM INSIDE VAULT DIMENSIONS (EXCLUDES SIAMESE CONNECTION) A B C D LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT 4" x 3/4" 2'-9" 1'-1" 0'-6" 4'-3" 10'-0" 5'-0" 6'-6" 6" x 3/4" 3'-9" 1'-2" 0'-8" 5'-6" 11'-0" 6'-0" 6'-6" 8" x 3/4" 4'-5" 1'-4" 0'-9" 6'-4" 12'-0" 6'-0" 6'-6" " x 1" ri 6'-0" 1'-8" 0'-11' 8'-6" 14'-6" 7'-0" NO HIGHER THAN 5' TO CENTER OF #2 SHUT Vtl OFF VALVE 6" MINIMUM FROM THE FLOOR a. SENSUS SR2 WITH ECR/WP REMOTE READ THE ECR/WP SHALL BE INSTALLED ON AN OUTSIDE WALL FOR EASY METER READING INDOOR VERTICAL INSTALLATION CITY OF EDMONDS DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY (DCDA) PLAN PUBLIC WORKS (COMMERCIAL MULTI -FAMILY) DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I — parkn4 ddd I 7.1.a I * DOOR SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY SIZE I� OF VAULT AND ACCESSIBILITY TO LADDER ~1 V 4" STORZ ADAPTER W/ 120' BEND V TRPL REMOTE -\ READ FINISHED DOUBLE LEAF TRAFFIC `GRADE BEARING LID WITH DRAIN / SLOTS LW HATCH I II _ a 4" HOSE DRAIN PIPE I I� CONNECTION W(AS REIRED DELLINOROCB)Y C — LI_ — BY FIIREQUDEPTT) < Z tl Z MEGA LUG MID SPAN RESTRAINT AND o THRUST BLOCK AND VAULT SEAL I I LADDER > I d SEE COE STD DTL E7.2.2 (TYP) a _ 1 I APWA STD t I (PLAN #41) EXTEND OUT s.:. AS REQUIRED 18" MIN iUBLE CHECK VALVES I I TO ALIGN (1YP) APPROVED OSY I I WITH HATCH d.4a I a AA f� FLOW 11 d a Z °:. 2 MINIMUM GRINNEL ° d A' PIPE SADDLE AND. d 10" FLOOR STAND #258 OR EQUAL DRAIN 6-5/8" MINUS C.S.T.C. COMPACTED TO 95% MAX. DENSITY w w 0 2" PVC DRAIN TO SUMP OR TIGHTLINE TO DRAI j DEPENDING ON SOIL/GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS NOTES: \- WASHED DRAIN ROCK 1. ACCESSES BY LW HATCH: TYPE "D" (HD-10 PEDESTRIAN LOAD; H-30 TRAFFIC LOAD) WITH SIDE OUTLET GUTTER DRAIP 2. VAULT COVER GUTTER DRAIN SHALL CONNECT TO A DRY WELL OR CATCH BASIN. 3. SEE COE STD DTLS E7.19 AND E7.20 FOR DCDA LOCATION AND CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS. CITY OF EDMONDS DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY (DCDA) PROFILE PUBLIC WORKS (COMMERCIAL MULTI -FAMILY), DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 445 I 7.1.a I BLIND FLANGE CAPPED CROSS CROSS ^' '"'^ FLANGE OR ER SIZE PIPE b b Bri B TEE 1:..� C CAP a TEE W/ PLUG C 90' BEND PLUG 45' BEND 22-1 /2' BEND 11-1 /4' BEND NOTES: 1. BEARING AREA OF CONCRETE THRUST BASED ON 200 PSI PRESSURE AND SAFE SOIL. BEARING LOAD OF 2,000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. 2. AREAS MUST BE ADJUSTED FOR OTHER PIPE SIZES, PRESSURES, AND SOIL CONDITIONS. THRUST BLOCK TABLE MIN BEARING AREA AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL SQUARE FEET MIN DIST (IN FEET) PIPE SIZE A B C D E b d 4" 3 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 6" 4 4 2 1 1 1 0.5 8" 7 6 4 2 1 1.3 0.7 10" 11 10 6 3 2 1.6 0.9 12" 16 14 9 5 3 1.9 1.1 16" 29 25 16 8 1 4 1 2.6 1.4 CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3. CONCRETE BLOCKING SHALL BE CAST IN PLACE AND HAVE A MINIMUM OF 1/4 SQUARE FOOT BEARING AGAINST THE FITTING. 4. THRUST BLOCK SHALL BEAR AGAINST FITTINGS AND UNDISTURBED SOIL. FITTING SHALL BE WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE FILM BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BLOCKING ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND FULL TEST PRESSURE AS WELL AS TO CONTINUOUSLY WITHSTAND OPERATIONAL PRESSURE UNDER ALL CONDITIONS OF SERVICE. 6. BLOCKING MAY BE REDUCED WITH USE OF RESTRAINED JOINT ADJACENT TO FITTINGS. 7. CONCRETE SHALL NOT COVER FITTING BOLT AND NUTS. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 446 I 7.1.a I VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 11 1/4'-22 1 /2'-30' BENDS PIPE SIZE V B CLI FT A D L 4" 11 1 /4' 8 2.0' 3/4" 1.5' 22 1 /2' 11 2.2' 2.0' 30' 17 2.6' 6" 11 1 /4' 11 2.2' 3/4" 2.0' 22 1 /2' 25 2.9' 30' 41 3.5' 8" 11 1 /4' 16 2.5' 3/4" 2.0' 22 1 /2' 47 3.6' 30' 70 4.1 ' 3/4" 2.5' 12" 11 1 /4' 32 3.2' 3/4" 2.0' 22 1 /2' 88 4.5' 7/8" 3.0' 30' 132 5.1' 16" 11 1 /4' 70 4.1 ' 7/8" 3.0' 22 1 /2' 184 5.7' 1 1 /8" 4.0' 30' 275 6.5' 1 1 /4" 20" 11 1 /4' 91 4.5' 7/8" 3.0' 22 1 /2' 225 6.1 ' 1 1 /4" 4.0' 30' 330 6.9' 1 3/8" 4.5' 24" 11 1 /4' 128 5.0' 1 " 3.5' 22 1 /2' 320 6.8' 1 3/8" 4.5' 30' 480 7.9' 1 1 5/8" 5.5' VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 45' BENDS 4" 45' 30 3.1 ' 3/4" 2.0' 6" 68 4. 1' 8" 123 5.0' 12" 232 1 6.1 ' 3/4" 2.5' 16" 478 7.8' 1 1 /8" 4.0' 20" 560 8.2' 1 1 /4" 24" 820 9.4' 1 3/8" 4.5' CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PIPE CLAMP (HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED) WITH RODS (STAINLESS STEEL - / ALL THREAD 316SS) 1 Ll VER BEN UNDISTURBE[ EARTH JA A SEE DETAIL W-5, A APPLIES TO ALL ANCHORS VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 11 1 /4% 22 1 /2% & 30' BENDS PIPE CLAMP (HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED) WITH RODS (STAINLESS STEEL - ALL THREAD 316SS) SEE NOTE 3 ..A (TYPICAL) Dye ..a a UNDISTURBE[ EARTH VERTICAL BLOCKING NOTES: FOR 45' BENDS 1. CONCRETE BLOCKING BASED ON 200 PSI PRESSURE AND 2500 PSI CONCRETE. 2. LEAVE BLOCK OPEN OR SHEETED 24 HOURS MINIMUM. 3. MEGA -LUG FITTINGS. VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR CONNECTION TO EXISTING MAIN REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 447 I 7.1.a I PIPE CLAMPS & RODS (SEE NOTE 4) SEE DETAIL W-5, APPLIES TO ALL I ANCHORS PIPE CLAMPS & RODS (SEE NOTE 4) -1 -SEND D 6. • :. 'D D- •NOTE LLI A. d aQ+• e//\/� °a. .dam d ° ._a dp�e a e a da ° a A I A VERTICAL BLOCKING VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 11 1 /4' & 22 1 /2' FOR 45' BENDS NOTES: 1. NO CHANGE IN PIPE DIRECTION OR DIAMETER SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 36 FEET OF THE VERTICAL BEND. BENDS, TEES, REDUCERS, ETC. BEYOND THE 36 FOOT LIMIT SHALL BE RESTRAINED BY STANDARD CONCRETE BLOCKING PER STD. DTL. E7.9 & E7.9.1. 2. CONCRETE BLOCKING SIZES BASED ON: • 36 FEET OF PIPE RESTRAINED EACH SIDE OF BEND. • THRUST BLOCK AREAS BASED ON SAFE BEARING LOAD OF 1,000 PSF. • 2,500 PSI CONCRETE. • MINIMUM 3 FEET OF COVER. • PIPE THRUST BASED ON 200 PSI PRESSURE. • PIPE ENCASED IN POLYETHYLENE. • VERTICAL BLOCK SIZE BASED ON CONCRETE WEIGHT OF 150 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT. • TRENCH CONDITIONS BASED ON TYPE 2, FLAT BOTTOM TRENCH WITH LIGHTLY CONSOLIDATED BACKFILL, PER ANSI/AWWA Cl 50/A21.50. • FACTOR OF SAFETY IS 1.5. • SOIL FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE BASED ON COHESIVE GRANULAR SOIL TYPE (GC+SC). SAND, GRAVEL, CLAY MIXTURE. 3. BLOCKING DESIGN MUST BE ADJUSTED FOR OTHER SIZE PIPE, PRESSURES AND SOIL CONDITIONS. 4. PIPE CLAMP (HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED). RODS (STAINLESS STEEL ALL -THREAD 316SS) 5. LINE SHALL NOT BE PRESSURIZED UNTIL ALL TRENCHING 5. WITHIN 100 FEET OF VERTICAL BEND IS BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO MINIMUM COVER OF 3 FEET OVER PIPE. 6. 90' VERTICAL BENDS SHALL ONLY BE INSTALLED WHERE GIVEN PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE UTILITY. 7. BACKFILL TRENCH BEYOND 90' VERTICAL BLOCK WITH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY. CRUSHED BACKFILL SHALL EXTEND 20 FEET BEYOND BLOCK OR TO FIRM BEARING TRENCH WALL, WHICHEVER IS LESS. 8. LEAVE BLOCK OPEN OR SHEETED 24 HOURS MINIMUM. 9. MEGA -LUG FITTINGS. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0 W m 0 � 0 Z D PIPE CLAMPS & RODS (SEE NOTE VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 90' BENDS (SEE NOTE 6) VERTICAL BLOCKING SIZE W/RESTRAINED JOINTS SOIL TYPE = COHESIVE GRANULAR [GC+SC] SAND, GRAVEL, CLAY MIXTURE PIPE SIZE V B CU FT A D L 4" 11 1 /4' 22 1 /2' 45' * 90' 16 2.5' 3/4" 2.0' 6" 11 1 /4' 22 1 /2' 45' 13 2.3' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 43 3.5' 3/4" 2.0' 8" 11 1 /'v 22 1 /2' 45' 33 3.2' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 86 4.4' 3/4" 2.0' 10" 11 1 /4' 22 1 /2' 13 2.3' 3/4" 2.0' 45' 64 4.0' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 141 5.2' 1 " 3.5' 12" 11 1/4' 22 1 /2' 20 2.7' 3/4" 2.0' 45' 111 4.8' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 206 5.9' 1 1 /8" 4.0' * BLOCKING NOT REQUIRED IF 36 FEET OF PIPE IS RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF BEND VERTICAL BLOCKING WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR NEW LINES REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr ddR I 7.1.a I T SIDE OF TRENCH WALL (TYP) SIDE OF TRENCH WALL D.I. PIPE SINGLE MAT #4'S ® 12" O.C. BW — 3" COVER ALL WAYS WIDTH OF TRENCH PLUS 36" D.I. PIPE SINGLE MAT #4'S ® 12" O.C. BW — 3" COVER ALL WAYS PIPE CLAMP AND J—BOLT OR ALL —THREAD WITH NUTS AND WASHERS PER DETAIL E7.9.4 PIPE SIZE DIMENSIONS A B C D E 4" 2.4 4.8 17 13 14.6 6" 3.5 6.9 18 14 14.5 8" 4.5 9.1 19 15 14.5 10" 5.6 11.1 20 16 14.4 12" 6.6 13.2 21 17 14.4 14" 7.7 15.3 22 18 14.3 16" 8.7 17.4 23 19 14.3 18" 9.8 19.5 24 20 14.2 D.I. PIPE ..•.. ail ®��' .. u • 9" 9" 18" MIN NOTES: SLOPES > 20% — PROVIDE CONCRETE SLOPE ANCHORS (20' TO 25' ON CENTER) CITY OF EDMONDS CONCRETE SLOPE ANCHOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2500 PSI CONCRETE (CAST IN PLACE; REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parks+ Pg. 449 I 7.1.a I JTY PIPE CLAMP (COOPER 33132 PIPE CLAMP OR EQUAL) 'ED GALVANIZED NUT TOP AND BOTTOM W/ FLAT WASHER (2) —BOLT (STAINLESS STEEL AND 'HREADED FOR CONNECTION TO PIPE ;LAMP) OR kLL THREADED ROD W/ 2 NUTS AND VASHERS (STAINLESS STEEL 316SS) NUTS/WASHERS HOOK NOTES: 1. J—BOLT DIAMETER: — PIPE DIAMETER LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 6": 7/8", 6" & 8" PIPE: 1", 10" = 1-1/4" — PIPE DIAMETER GREATER THAN 12": 1-1/2" 2. TIGHTEN TOP NUTS TO TENSION BOLTS 3. TIGHTEN LOWER NUTS TO COMPRESS CLAMP SNUG CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PIPE CLAMP AND ANCHOR RODS FOR CONCRETE BLOCKING REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Pg. 450 I 7.1.a I TOP VIEW TEST COCKS W/ PVC PLUGS (4 REQ'D) RESILIENT SEATED SHUTOFF VALVES (2 REQ'D) OO �/— OO MIN 12" CLEARANCES AROUND ADEQUATE GRAVITY DRAINAGE BACKFLOW PREVENTER — 12" MIN SYSTEM REQUIRED ALL SIDES, TOP AND BOTTOM 5' MAX W/ APPROVED AIR GAP GROUND/FLOOR NOTES: SIDE VIEW 1. APPROVED REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL ONLY. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE. 3. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. 4. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING. 5. MUST BE ACCESSIBLE. 6. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS. 7. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL. 8. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED— PLEASE CONTACT LOCAL PLUMBING PERMIT CENTER. 9. MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) REDUCED PRESSURE CITY OF EDMONDS BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY 2" PUBLIC WORKS AND SMALLER (RPBA) DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 451 I 7.1.a I w z J 0 w 0- 0 w 0- IF RPDA, USE SENSUS SR2 METER W/ TRPL REMOTE READ. TRPL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON SIDE OF HOT z BOX WITH EASY ACCESS FOR METER READING. UNION 3" MIN I� 3/8"x4" ANCHOR BOLTS (PER MANUFACTURER) CONCRETE SLAB z (2000 PSI MIN) N 4" MIN 6" MIN 1- PVC FREE DRAINING GRAVEL SLEEVE (TYP) TYPE K COPPER OR APPROVED z EQUAL (SIZE AS REQ) (TYP) co ENCLOSURE "HOT BOX" OR EQUAL REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY (RPBA) 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR HEAT TAPE. INSTALL HEAT TAPE FOR FREEZE PROTECTION. IF RPDA, USE SENSUS SR2 METER W/ TRPL REMOTE READ UNION I CENTER BACKFLOW PREVENTER IN ENCLOSURE 3" MIN DRAIN SEE NOTE 6 12" PVC SLEEVE (TYP) SUPPORTS TYPE K COPPER OR APPROVED EQUAL (SIZE AS REQ) (TYP) 3" MIN 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR HEF TAPE. INSTALL HEAT TAPE FOR FREEZE �O PROTECTION. z N FINISHED GRADE 6x6 W2.9xW2.9 WWF (WELDED WIRE FABRIC) CONNECT TO WATER METER IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO RPBA FLOW TO OWNERS ELECTRICAL PANEL DIRECT BURIAL OR IN RIGID CONDUIT PER ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS NOTES: SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW (METER SIDE) 1. PROVIDE CITY APPROVED SUPPORT FOR DEVICES LARGER THAN 1" DIAMETER. 2. OWNER SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THE RPBA OR RPDA AND ALL PIPING AND APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 3. CITY WILL PROVIDE INSPECTION. INITIAL TEST OF THE RPBA OR RPDA PRIOR TO ESTABLISHMENT OF WATER SERVICE WILL BE DONE BY A STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. 4. REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE STATE APPROVED DEVICES. 5. ANNUAL TESTING OF RPBA AND RPDA REQUIRED BY OWNER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMOND! PUBLIC WORKS. 6. DRAIN SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL FIGURE 6-8 (SEE STD DETAIL SHEET E 7.1 1.1). 7. ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. 8. SLEEVE SHALL BE ONE NOMINAL SIZE DIAMETER LARGER THAN PIPE BEING SLEEVED. HOT BOX ASSEMBLY FOR CITY OF EDMONDS REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLO) PUBLIC WORKS ASSEMBLY (RPBA AND RPDA) DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 452 I 7.1.a I 175 150 100 N N W a 75 W z 0 N 25 AWWA CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL RPBA DISCHARGE RATES N , 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 FLOW RATE (GPM) FIGURE 6-8 APPROXIMATE RELIEF VALVE DISCHARGE RATES FOR REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THE ENTIRE DRAINAGE SYSTEM HAS ADEQUATE CAPACITY TO CARRY THE CONTINUOUS DISCHARGE RATES SHOWN ABOVE. THE FOLLOWING ARE TYPICAL FLOW RATES AS SIZED BY ONE FLOOR DRAIN MANUFACTURER AND REPRESENT ONLY THE FLOOR DRAIN CAPACITY: SIZE: 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" CAPACITY (GPM): 55 112 170 450 760 FOR PARALLEL ASSEMBLIES, THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOULD BE DESIGNED FOR THE DISCHARGE FROM BOTH ASSEMBLIES. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RPBA DISCHARGE RATES (FIGURE 6-8) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 453 I 7.1.a I SENSUS SR2 W/ TRPL REMOTE READ. THE TRPL 24" MIN TEST COCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON (4 REQ'D) SIDE OF VAULT WITH EASY 0 0 0 o ACCESS FOR METER READING. ENCLOSURE "HOT BOX" ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 18" MIN AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RELIEF PROTECTION VALVE PLAN VIEW 3' MIN WHEN VALVE IS FULLY OPEN ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR RESILIENT SEATED ANCHOR BOLTS HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION SHUTOFF VALVES CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL �� (2 REQ'D) PER MANUFACTURER AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RECOMMENDATIONS PROTECTION 18" MIN ANCHOR BOLTS PER 18" MIN MANUFACTURER'S _ 0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4 DRAIN MIN DRAIN TOWARD ON SITE r2" 12" MIN — 4' MAX DRAINAGE SYSTEM, NOT FINISH GRADE1 TOWARD ROW � d.d 36" M I N SUPPORT STEEL SCREW JACK f L1/2" EXPANSION JOINT --Ll--- MATERIAL (TYP) VCONCRETE SLAB (3000PS) TO OWNER'S ELECTRICAL PANEL W/ 6x6 — W2.9xW2.9 WWF DIRECT BURIAL OR RIGID CONDUIT PER (WELDED WIRE FABRIC) ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS SIDE VIEW NOTES: 1. APPROVED REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL ONLY. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE. 3. THE WATER LINE SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED, AND PRESSURE TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING AND FLOODING. 4. ALL PIPE, VALVES, AND FITTING JOINTS, FROM SUPPLY MAIN, SHALL BE FLANGED AND RESTRAINED. 5. A CITY APPROVED VALVE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SUPPLY MAIN AND THE VAULT. 6. HOT BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED AT PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT LINE. 7. HOT BOX SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3' CLEARANCE FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 8. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND ALSO YEARLY THEREAFTER BY A CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. 9. MECHANICALLY RESTRAIN ALL FITTINGS AND JOINTS BETWEEN CITY MAIN AND ASSEMBLY. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CITY OF EDMONDS REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR ASSEMBLY PUBLIC WORKS (RPDA) 2.5" AND LARGER DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 454 I 7.1.a I SENSUS SR2 W/ TRPL REMOTE READ. THE TRPL 24" MIN TEST COCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ` (4 REQ'D) SIDE OF VAULT WITH EASY 0 0q o ACCESS FOR METER ENCLOSURE READING. "HOT BOX" OR EQUAL ENCLOSURE "HOT BOX" ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 18" MIN AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RELIEF PROTECTION VALVE PLAN VIEW 3' MIN WHEN VALVE IS FULLY OPEN ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR RESILIENT SEATED HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION �� SHUTOFF VALVES ANCHOR BOLTS CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL (2 REQ'D) PER MANUFACTURER AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RECOMMENDATIONS PROTECTION 18" MIN 18" MIN ANCHOR BOLTS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 4" DRAIN — MIN DRAIN TOWARD ON SITE r2" 12" MIN — 4' MAX DRAINAGE SYSTEM, NOT FINISH GRADE 1 TOWARD ROW /�� \ 36" M I N ��'��'�.....�' SUPPORT STEEL SCREW JACK 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL (TYP) CONCRETE SLAB (3000PS) TO OWNER'S ELECTRICAL PANEL W/ 6x6 — W2.9xW2.9 WWF DIRECT BURIAL OR RIGID CONDUIT PER (WELDED WIRE FABRIC) ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS SIDE VIEW NOTES: 1. APPROVED REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL ONLY. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE. 3. THE WATER LINE SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED, AND PRESSURE TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING AND FLOODING. 4. ALL PIPE, VALVES, AND FITTING JOINTS, FROM SUPPLY MAIN, SHALL BE FLANGED AND RESTRAINED. 5. A CITY APPROVED VALVE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SUPPLY MAIN AND THE VAULT. 6. HOT BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED AT PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT LINE. 7. HOT BOX SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3' CLEARANCE FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 8. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND ALSO YEARLY THEREAFTER BY A CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. 9. MECHANICALLY RESTRAIN ALL FITTINGS AND JOINTS BETWEEN CITY MAIN AND ASSEMBLY. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CREDUCED PRESSURE CITY OF EDMONDS BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY PUBLIC WORKS (RPBA) 2.5" AND LARGER DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE AUGUST 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr d55 I 7.1.a I 1" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL 6" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL FOR GENERAL PLUMBING FLOOD La NOTES: DCCII ICAIT CCATCM CUI ITn CC 1. APPROVED PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY MUST BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, 1- MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL IF FACTORY MOUNTED OR 6" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL FOR GENERAL PLUMBING 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE ONLY, NOT FOR BACK PRESSURE 3. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER 4. IF A SVBA IS INSTALLED INDOORS, CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO WATER LEAKAGE IF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FAILS (EXCESSIVE WATER SPILLAGE) 5. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING 6. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS 7. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL 8. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED- PLEASE CONTACT LOCAL PLUMBING PERMIT CENTER 9. MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) SPILL -RESISTANT PRESSURE CITY OF EDMONDS VACUUM BREAKER (SVBA) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg 456 I 7.1.a I POTABLE WATER SUPPLY C OVERFLOW RIM AIR GAP 2xD — 1" MIN rrrrr�---rrrrrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r _1»:Ze1T1IIo1_1I:9eL2�yI1J_122%1Lei 2; TO NON —POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PUMP AN APPROVED AIR GAP IS A PHYSICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE FREE FLOWING DISCHARGE END OF A POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PIPELINE AND THE OVERFLOW RIM OF AN OPEN OR NON — PRESSURE RECEIVING VESSEL. THESE VERTICAL, PHYSICAL SEPARATIONS MUST BE AT LEAST TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE INLET PIPE BUT NEVER LESS THAN ONE INCH. IF SPLASHING IS A PROBLEM, TUBULAR SCREENS MAY BE ATTACHED OR THE SUPPLY LINE OUTLET MAY BE CUT AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE. IF SUPPLY LINE IS CUT AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE THE AIR GAP DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE ANGLE. HOSES ARE NOT ALLOWED. BYPASSES ARE NOT ALLOWED. THE INSPECTION OF AIR GAPS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE YEARLY TESTING PROGRAM FOR BACKFLOW DEVICES. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AIR GAP FOR MAKEUP TANK (AG) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr d57 I 7.1.a I STREAM 6" P 5' h GROUND/FLOOR NOTES: 1. APPROVED PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY MUST BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, 6" MIN ABOVE THE HIGHEST POINT OF USE AND ALL DOWN STREAM PIPING 2. 6" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL FOR GENERAL PLUMBING 3. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE ONLY, NOT FOR BACK PRESSURE 4. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER 5. IF AVB IS INSTALLED INDOORS, CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO WATER LEAKAGE IF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FAILS (EXCESSIVE WATER SPILLAGE) 6. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING 7. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS 8. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL 9. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED— OBTAIN PERMIT FROM CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10. NO DOWNSTREAM VALVES ARE ALLOWED 11. THIS DEVICE DOES NOT REQUIRE TESTING BY A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATMOSPHERIC/ANTI-SIPHON VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY 2" & SMALLER (AVB) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr d5R I 7.1.a I OCCII ICAIT l`CA-rC'M CLJI IT/1CC MIN. OF 6" CLEARANCE AROUND BACKFLOW PREVENTER. ALL SIDES, TOP AND BOTTOM NOTES: 1. APPROVED PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY MUST BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, 12" MIN. — 5' MAX ABOVE THE HIGHEST POINT OF USE AND ALL DOWN STREAM PIPING. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE ONLY, NOT FOR BACK PRESSURE. 3. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. 4. IF A PVBA IS INSTALLED INDOORS, CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO WATER LEAKAGE IF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FAILS (EXCESSIVE WATER SPILLAGE). 5. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING. 6. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS. 7. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL. 8. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED— PLEASE CONTACT LOCAL PLUMBING PERMIT CENTER. 9. MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY (PVBA) 2" AND SMALLER REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg 459 I 7.1.a I CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK PER COE STD DTL E7.9 MJxMJ ADAPTER MJ GV UPLING MAIN fM �St. JB9v FLxMJ GV MJxFL TEE MJ GV 3' CONC BRICK SUPPORT F —1 Ix MAI N 3' MIN " (TYP) 2 SERVICE TAP PER COE STD DTL E7.6.1 4" DIP FIRE LINE 940 STYLE CAST IRON VALVE BOX AND EXTENSION INSTALL 12" RIBBED PVC MJxMJ DI LONG BODY COUPLING IWA�TERAIN CONC BRICK SUPPORT c NUMBER OF BRICKS REQUIRED DEPENDS ON i AMOUNT OF OVER EXCAVATIO1 s /TVm\ f NOTES: 1. CDF SHALL BE 3/4 SACK MIX DESIGN PER WSDOT STANDARDS. 2. BACKFILL SHALL BE PER COE STD DTL E4.2. CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE AND 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE CONNECTIONS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L Packet Pg. 460 7.1 a CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SEE COE STD DTL E7.9 MJ—,- FLxFL TEE 3' MIN (TYP) FLxMJ RSGV (TYP) MJxMJ DI LONG BODY COUPLING ACP SURFACE 940 STYLE CAST INSTALL RIBBED PVC PIPE (ASTM D-3034) WHEN MATCH THICKNESS IRON VALVE BOX USING CDF BACKFILL ONLY (TYP FOR ALL VALVES) PER COE STD DTL E2.3 AND EXTENSION r 0 O 0' � of(n O� z FL0) Co m0 w� _ u 0 LL 3 z rj 0 O _ I� U Of � O� 0 r 0 Q U z MAIN COUPLING 0 0 w m ... °. •. • CONC BRICK SUPPORT UNDISTURBED '" ° NUMBER OF BRICKS REQUIRED DEPENDS ON SOIL : ° ;. ' ,• . AMOUNT OF OVER EXCAVATION (NATIVE) .. .. AF NOTE: 1. BACKFILL SHALL BE PER COE STD DTL E4.2. CITY OF EDMONDS TYPICAL WATER VALVE CLUSTER CONNECTION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L C7 1 Q 1 Packet Pg. 461 I 7.1.a I POURED THRUST BLOCK PER COE DETAIL E7.9 CONCRETE SUPPORT BLOCKS COMPACTED BEDDING GRAVEL PER SECTION 9-03.12(3) OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS DUCTILE IRON TAPPING TEE MECHANICAL JOINT SLEEVE INSTALLED ON CAST IRON PIPE AND DUCTILE IRON PIPE NOTES: POURED THRUST BLOCK PER COE DETAIL E7.9 3 x ID ONCRETE UPPORT LOCKS PER SECTION 9-03.12(3) OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS STAINLESS STEEL OR STEEL TAPPING TEE STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING TEE INSTALLED ON CAST IRON PIPE AND DUCTILE IRON PIPE STEEL TAPPING TEE INSTALLED ON DUCTILE IRON PIPE ONLY 1 STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING TEES SHALL HAVE FULL CIRCLE SEAL. BOLTS AND NUTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 2. STEEL TAPPING TEES SHALL BE EPDXY COATED. BOLTS AND NUTS SHALL BE COR—TEN, OR STAINLESS STEEL. 3. ALL TEES AND VALVES TO BE WATER TESTED BEFORE TAP. 4. TAPPING TEE MAY NOT BE SIZE ON SIZE. TAP SHALL BE AT LEAST 2" SMALLER DIAMETER THAN THE EXISTING MAIN CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TAPPING TEES REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 462 I 7.1.a I SEE ENLARGED DETAILS E 7.18 � U EX WATER MAIN U UU 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE (COPPER) 4" FIRE LINE (MIN) (DIP) ° SIDEWALK . ° < PROPERTY WATER METER LINE I I I I � BLDG� DCDA \ / SEE RIGHT PROPERTY LINE ROW DEPTH TO MEET CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS SEE ZJ DTL E7.8U FDC \ o J m 0 I O C U w z /PIV REMOTE READER U NOTES (BLDGS WITHOUT SETBACKS) 1. THE PIV AND FDC SHALL BE LOCATED LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING OR IN A LANDSCAPED AREA. AT NO TIME SHALL THE PIV OR FDC BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. 2. THE DCDA SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE INTERIOR WALL OR IN A ROOM ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE THE FIRELINE TIES INTO THE CITY MAIN. 3. THE PIV AND FDC SHALL HAVE A 3' MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN AND AROUND THEM. 4. THE SENSUS ECR/WP REMOTE READER SHALL BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING 4' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 5. THE FDC SHALL BE 4" PIPE AND HAVE A 22' BEND WITH 4" STORZ ADAPTER ON THE END. 6. THE WATER METER SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE PROPERTY LINE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. LOCATION OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY LINE, SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE LINE & 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE CONNECTIONS (PLAN VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS (PLAN VIEW) ZERO —SETBACK DEPARTMENT BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL ZONE REVISION DATE OCTOBER, 201 ° STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 463 I 7.1.a I EXIST WATER MAIN PROPERTY LINE SEE DETAIL E7.18 / 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE NA (COPPER) I 4" (MIN) FIRE LINE (DIP) RESILIENT GATE VALVES (TYP) SEE COE STD DTLS E7.18 AND E7.18.1 CURB J SIDEWALK NOTES SETBACK LINE PIV )P FDC °a :a DCDA & VAULT SEE DETAILS E7.8 & E7.8.1 BLDG 1. THE DCDA AND VAULT SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NEXT TO THE RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE. 2.THE PIV AND FDC SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND SHALL BE NEAR THE DCDA. 3. THE PIV AND FDC SHALL HAVE A 3' MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN AND AROUND THEM. 4. THE FDC SHALL HAVE A 22' BEND WITH 4" STORZ ADAPTER ON THE END. FIRE LINE AND 2" DOMESTIC CITY OF E D M O N D S SERVICE CONNECTION (PLAN VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS ALL ZONES EXCEPT ZERO -SETBACK DEPARTMENT I BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH' PacketPn 464 I 7.1.a I 4-1 /4" 1 /8" MIN SEE [ 2" SQUARE OPERATING NUT gESS 2-1/4" INSIDE MEASUREMENT 2-1/4" DEPTH VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSION EXTENSIONS ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE VALVE NUT IS MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. EXTENSIONS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) FOOT LONG. ONLY ONE EXTENSION TO BE USED PER VALVE. NOTES: 1. ALL EXTENSIONS ARE TO BE MADE OF STEEL, SIZED AS NOTED, AND HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. 2. INSTALL EXTENSIONS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER LINE VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VALVE OPERATING EXTENSION REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 465 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX H Packet Pg. 466 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 467 aa}eM dw03 L60Z ay; uo 6uPeaH ailgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;s/ S aa;eM anlsuayaadwOO LL0Z :;uauayae11V 00 ev _ CD T a. m CITY OF EDMONDS a CROSS -CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM 1. INTRODUCTION Congress passed the "Safe Drinking Water Act" with the intent of protecting the public health and welfare of all public water supply users in the United States. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpreted this mandate to mean that certain contaminants should not be found in water delivered to the water meter or the property line. Thus, these contaminants became the responsibility of the water purveyor (City of Edmonds). The EPA specifically exempted contaminants added to the water under circumstances controlled by the user (except for plumbing corrosion by-products). This was not, however, intended to absolve the purveyor of a responsibility to conduct an aggressive cross connection control program. As required by the Washington State Department of Health, the City of Edmonds responsibility is to protect the water distribution system from contamination. The greatest public health risk lies in the introduction of a contaminant into the public water supply system because the water distribution system can provide the conduit for the spread of the contaminant to a large population. Cross connections within the customer's plumbing system and within the purveyor's distribution system pose a potential source for the contamination of the public water supply. Once water leaves the control of the water purveyor (i.e., leaves the distribution system), the water purveyor must consider the possibility that the water could become contaminated. Accordingly, the water purveyor must consider the plumbing systems of all customers to be a potential health hazard. The hazard, and thus the health risk, may vary from minor to severe. The purveyor's cross connection control program should be based on the supposition that all customers should be isolated at the property line (meter) with an approved air gap, unless the purveyor is satisfied with the level of protection provided by the customer. Notwithstanding this basic supposition, the water purveyor should recognize the practical needs of the customer, and the responsibility of other regulatory agencies to protect the customer's plumbing system from becoming contaminated. 3 as}eM diuo3 L60Z ay; uo GuiMaH a!Ignd : 6ZZZ) veld W04S S aa;eM anisuayaidwOO L1,OZ :;uauayaeJJV eo CD a. m The water purveyor's degree of satisfaction in the customer's reduction of their cross connection a. risk, is a factor in the determination by the purveyor that the purveyor's requirement for premises isolation may be reduced from an approved air gap, to a reduced pressure backflow assembly, double check valve assembly, or no premises isolation. To protect occupants of the customer's premises, it is necessary to isolate areas of the premises and/or each outlet rather than to install backflow protection at the meter. Generally, the prevention of contamination of a water distribution system or potable water system in a building is of concern to the following: The water purveyor (City of Edmonds) The plumbing inspector (City of Edmonds) The local health inspector (Snohomish County Health District) The Dept. of Labor & Industries (worker safety regulations) A Cross connection program may be administered by any or all of the above. To avoid confusion, it is desirable for the water purveyor to have a joint or cooperative program with the other agencies having jurisdiction. Unfortunately, although each has the same overall goal of preventing contamination, each has a different enforcement criteria, authority and responsibility as well as jurisdictional area that may prevent a subordination of its authority to another agency. The need to eliminate cross connections as a source of potential contamination has been long recognized in plumbing design and plumbing code enforcement. However, plumbing codes handled cross connections only in very general terms. Few details are provided to specify methods of identifying and preventing cross connections. This is because it is impractical to cover in a plumbing code all of the information needed to control cross connections. The plumbing code addresses the plumbing design and installation in new buildings. Generally, once a building occupancy permit is given, plumbing code jurisdiction effectively ceases until a permit is requested to modify the plumbing system. Changes to a plumbing system are often made without a permit. New equipment may be added. Piping, fixtures and appliances may wear out, malfunction, or be relocated. New cross connections may then be created. Backflow prevention assemblies and devises installed under the plumbing code to protect the public could be removed, bypassed or fail to operate due to the lack of maintenance. For these reasons, it is recommended that a water purveyor not place full reliance on the enforcement of the plumbing code to protect the water distribution system from contamination through cross connections. The history of cross connection control has provided regulatory authorities with sufficient information to establish a list of those premises where high health hazard cross connections exist, or where the potential hazard is so great that these premises must be isolated from the water purveyor's system. Some states and provinces have established mandatory protection for these premises. However, it is important that each premise be surveyed individually to assess the degree of hazard and what corresponding backflow prevention assembly is required. All premises of the same kind may not require the same type of backflow protection. 4 aa}eM dw03 L60Z ay; uo 6uUeaH ailgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;s/ S aa;eM anlsuayaadwOO LL0Z :;uauayae11V ea T ti Experience has shown that the water purveyor is in a unique position to implement and administer a cross connection control program. The water purveyor has authority to supply water to a customer and to establish standards and remedies for a breach of those standards. The City of Edmonds cross connection control program is needed to effectively deal with all aspects of the public health risk posed by cross connections. A. Purpose The purpose of the City of Edmonds (COE) cross -connection control program (CCP) is to protect the public water system from contamination via cross -connection. Ordinance gives the COE the authority to operate the CCP, which meets the requirements of the State of Washington regulation WAC 246-290-490. B. Policy The COE will ensure that cross -connections between the distribution system and a customer's premises are eliminated or controlled by the installation of a State of Washington approved backflow preventer that is equal to the degree of hazard. The COE will operate a combination program whereby premises isolation requires backflow protection with an Air Gap (AG) or a Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA). In - premises isolation backflow protection (within the customer's property lines) will be permitted if there is no high health hazard and the CCS coordinates with the Local Administrative Authority (LAA). The final building construction approval and occupancy shall not be granted by the Local Administrative Authority until final cross -connection compliance is determined by site inspection performed by the Cross -Connection Control Specialist. The customer is responsible for the expense to protect the public water system from backflow contamination by installing, maintaining and testing backflow assemblies in accordance with the COE Cross -Connection Program (Section 3). Failure of the customer to cooperate in the installation, maintenance, repair, inspection or testing of backflow prevention assemblies required by COE shall be grounds for termination of water service to the premises. In the event the water purveyor must initiate action to enforce compliance with the Ordinance on this program, all costs incurred enforcing the action shall be borne by the property owner/business owner. The COE will refer to the Pacific Northwest Section AWWA Cross -Connection Control Manual Accepted Procedure and Practice most current edition and the current Manual of Cross -Connection Control (USC Manual) on issues concerning cross -connection control. 5 aa}eM dw03 L60Z ay; uo BuPeaH ailgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;s/ S aa;eM anlsuayaadwOO LL0Z :;uauayae11V ea _ ti T ti d Y V R The COE will ensure that at least one person certified as a Cross -Connection Specialist a (CCS) is provided to develop and implement the cross -connection control program. Responsibilities include: 1. Administer the Cross -Connection Control Program (CCP). 2. Evaluate service connection for backflow hazards. 3. Reporting on the annual progress of the CCP. 4. Public Education. 5. Investigate water quality concerns where backflow is suspected. 6. Keep current records of all backflow preventer testing, air gaps installed in - lieu of approved backflow preventers, test kit calibration, and tester certification. 7. Responsible to eliminate or control cross -connections between the distribution system and the customer's premises. 8. Ensure quality control for backflow testing. 9. Inspect tank trucks and issue Hydrant Use Permits. 10. Complete Backflow Incident Response Forms and inform DOH, Snohomish County Health District, and the LAA of incidents involving contamination to the pubic water system. 11. Investigate all water quality complaints. 12. Review commercial and multifamily construction plans, city business license applications and any other means to identify the need for cross - connection control. C. Responsibilities The COE will not be responsible for any loss or damage caused by any negligence or wrongful act of a customer or his authorized representative in installing, maintaining, operating or using any and/or all appliances, facilities, or equipment for which water service is supplied. The customer will be held responsible for damage to COE facilities and other property resulting from the use and operation of appliances and facilities on the customer's premises, including damage caused by steam, hot water, chemical, etc. Edmonds Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Page 1/2 Sections: 7.20.010 Definitions. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — Procedures 7.20.070 Penalties. 7.20.010 Definitions. A. "Backflow" means a flow, other than the intended direction of flow, of any foreign liquids, gases, or substances into the distribution system of a public water supply. B. `Backflow prevention device" means a device approved by the state of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services or such other state department as has jurisdiction over the subject matter and by the American Water Works Association, used to counteract back pressure or prevent back siphonage into the distribution system of a public water supply. C. "Cross -connection" means any physical arrangement whereby a public water supply is connected, directly or indirectly, with any other water supply system, sewer, drain, conduit, pool, storage reservoir, plumbing fixture or other device which contains or may contain contaminated water, sewage or other wastes or liquids of unknown or unsafe quality, which may be capable of imparting contamination to a public water supply as a result of backflow. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. The installation or maintenance of a cross -connection, which, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designee, will endanger the water quality of the potable water supply of the city of Edmonds, is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. Backflow prevention devices, when required to be installed in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, shall be installed and maintained by the service customer on any service connection to the city of Edmonds water supply system where the backflow prevention devices are necessary for the protection of the city of Edmonds' water supply. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. Use or operation of a private water supply system, contrary to the provisions of the ordinances of the city of Edmonds, or the laws of the state of Washington or the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies where the private system is served by the city public water supply is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. The community services director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to develop rules and regulations based upon and including the requirements of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies and the protection of such supplies from contamination entitled "Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State," the provisions of WAC 246-290-490, and the American Waterworks Association, Pacific Northwest Second Edition of "Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual." The provisions of the Washington Administrative Code, the rules and regulations of the Department of Health set forth in the Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State and the previously referenced Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual are hereby adopted by this reference as fully as if herein set forth in full. Any additional rules and procedures necessary to implement such regulations shall be developed by the community services director or his/her designee as appropriate. Such rules and regulations shall be kept on file along with copies The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 472 Edmonds Page 2/2 Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION of the above referenced regulations and manuals in the office of the city engineer of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 2956 § 1, 1993; Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — Procedures. Cross -connections declared in this chapter to be unlawful whether presently existing or hereinafter installed and/or ca services requiring backflow prevention devices and/or unlawful use or operation of a private water supply system a served by the city public water supply are public nuisances and, in addition to any other provisions of this code or E the ordinances of the city of Edmonds on abatement of public nuisances, shall be subject to abatement in accordance N with the following procedure: A. In the event that the director of public works or his designee determines that a nuisance as herein provided does L exist, written notice shall be sent to the person in whose name the water service is established under the records of M the city of Edmonds water division, or alternatively, a copy of such written notice shall be posted on the premises a served. E 0 U B. The notice shall provide that the nuisance described herein shall be corrected within 30 days of the date the notice is mailed or posted on the premises. N C. In the event the nuisance is not abated within the prescribed time, water service to the premises shall be a) Z discontinued. r_ 0 D. In the event that the nuisance, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, tM i presents an immediate danger of contamination to the public water supply, service from the city water supply system m to the premises may be terminated without prior notice; provided, however, notice will be posted on the premises in = the manner heretofore provided at the time the service is terminated. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 2 7.20.070 Penalties. a In addition to the remedies set forth herein, any person found guilty of violating any of the provisions of this chapter CD shall be subject to the penalties as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. N N C M a E m N co L .y C d t N L E �0♦ V r 0 N r C a) E L 0 2 r a The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 473 7.1.a City of Edmonds Water Production and Distribution Cross -Connection and Backflow What is a Cross -Connection? A cross connection is any actual or potential physical connection between a "potable water" line and any pipe, vessel, or machine containing non -potable fluid, solid or gas allowing possible entry to the water system by backflow. This would include, but is not limited to, sewers, drains, conduits, pools, storage reservoirs, plumbing fixtures, or any other device. The non -potable or unproved water supply system may contain contaminated liquids, solids, or gases, of unknown or unsafe quality. Bypass arrangements such as jumper connections, removable sections, swivel or changeover devices are considered to be a cross connection. What is Backflow? Backflow is a flow in reverse from the normal direction of flow in a piping system. It occurs due to a differential pressure existing between two different points within a continuous fluid system: a fluid of higher pressures flowing to a fluid of lower pressure. Backflow may occur due to either "backs iphonage" or "backpressure." Irrigation Systems If you have or are planning on installing an irrigation system, you must first comply with Washington State Law (WAC 245-290), and the City of Edmonds Ordinance Chapter 7-20. These Laws require that all irrigation systems have approved backflow protection. A plumbing permit is also required when installing an irrigation system. Without proper backflow protection, your irrigation system could endanger the health of your family, neighbors, and others in the community who are using the public water system. The following state approved backflow assemblies are required to be installed per the City of Edmonds Standards, and must be tested by a Washington State Certified Backflow Assembly Tester upon installation, repairs, relocation, and annually thereafter: • Pressure Vacuum Breaker Assemblies (PVBA) • Double Check Valve Assemblies (DCVA) • Reduced Pressure Backflow Assemblies (RPBA) The atmospheric vacuum breaker is the only backflow prevention device that does not require annual testing. Improper installations of a State Approved Backflow Prevention Assembly or failure to have the backflow prevention assembly tested are grounds for termination of the water service. Packet Pg. 474 7.1.a On -site water wells If you have an on -site well and would like the City of Edmonds water service, you must first comply to Washington State Law (WAC 173-160 and WAC 246-290), and the City of Edmonds Ordinance (Chapter 7-20), before the city can install the water service. • Installation of a State Approved Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly: If you elect to keep your well, you will need to install a State Approved Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Assembly (RPBA) per City of Edmonds Standards above must be completed before the water can be turned on. • Abandonment of Your Well: If you elect to abandon your well, it must be properly abandoned using a licensed well driller. The licensed well driller will abandon the well per Washington State Law (WAC 173-160). Capping the well or pulling the pump is NOT proper abandonment; therefore the installation of a State Approve Reduced Pressure Backflow Prevention Assembly is required. Improper installation of the State Approved Backflow Prevention Assembly or the improper abandonment of the well is grounds for termination of the water service. If you have any questions concerning backflow installations, certified testers, or approved backflow prevention assembly, please call the Public Works Department at 425-771-0235, extension 1644 or by email Jeff.Kobylk@edmondswa.gov. WordataNVater/Cross Connection/Info for Web Site Packet Pg. 475 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX I Packet Pg. 476 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 477 Edmonds Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE Sections: 19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted. 19.25.005 Section amendments. 19.25.010 Department of fire prevention. 19.25.015 Definitions. 19.25.020 Permits. 19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection. 19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals. 19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems. 19.25.036 Dwelling fire sprinkler systems and connection fees. 19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies. 19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants. 19.25.050 Mains and service lines. 19.25.055 Location of public hydrants. 19.25.060 Location of private hydrants. 19.25.065 Hydrant specifications. 19.25.070 Penalties. Page 1/6 19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the International Fire Code (IFC), 2015 Edition, as published by the International Code Council including amendments set forth in Chapter 51-54A WAC, and subsequently revised by this chapter, is hereby adopted including reference standards of the National Fire Protection Association and Appendix Chapters B and C. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.005 Section amendments. The following sections of the IFC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows: A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section 102.5 Application of Residential Code. Adopted as originally set forth in IFC (notwithstanding revisions thereto by the state building code council). 2. Section 103.1-.2 Department of Fire Prevention. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.010. 3. Section 104.8 Modifications. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.030. 4. Section 104.10.1 Assistance from other agencies. Police and other enforcement agencies shall have the authority to render necessary assistance in the investigation of fires and enforcement and hazardous conditions of this code when requested by the fire marshal. 5. Section 105.1.1 Permits required. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.020. 6. Section 108 Board of appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 7. Section 109.4 Violation Penalties. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.070. B. Chapter 3, General Requirements. Section 308.1.6.3 Sky Lanterns. Is amended to read: It is unlawful for any person to sell, use, transfer, discharge or ignite any sky lantern within the city limits. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 478 Edmonds Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE C. Chapter 5, Fire Service Features. Section 503 Fire Apparatus Access Roads. The following sections are adopted as originally set forth in the IFC with the exception of 503.2.2: 1. Section 503.1 Where required. 2. Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. 3. Section 503.1.2 Additional access. 4. Section 503.1.3 High -piled storage. 5. Section 503.2 Specifications. 6. Section 503.3 Marking. 7. Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads. Section 503.2.2 is amended to read: Authority. The fire code official shall have the authority to require an increase in the minimum access widths where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations, and the authority to decrease the minimum access widths where other fire protection features are provided. D. Chapter 36, Marinas. Replaced in entirety by Chapter 19.65 ECDC. E. Chapter 56, Explosives and Fireworks. Section 5601.1.3 Fireworks. Replaced by Chapter 5.27 ECC. F. Chapter 57 Flammable and Combustible Liquids. Sections 5704.2.9.6.1 (outside) and 5706.2.4.4 (inside) Locations where above -ground tanks are prohibited. Class I and II flammable liquids in aboveground storage tanks are restricted for the protection of residential districts and shall be no more than 1,000 gallons capacity in residential zones designated by the city. G. Chapter 61 Liquefied Petroleum Gases. Section 6104.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. The maximum capacity for each installation is restricted for the protection of residential districts within the city and shall be no more than 500 gallons water capacity in residential zones designated by the city. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. Page 2/6 19.25.010 Department of fire prevention. A. There is established in the city a department of fire prevention supervised by the fire marshal or deputy chief of fire prevention acting under the supervision of the fire chief. The function of the department shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code. B. An annual report shall be provided to the mayor containing proceedings under this code, with other statistics as the fire chief and mayor wish to include. The fire marshal may also recommend any changes to the code. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.015 Definitions. A. Whenever the term "fire code official" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire marshal or deputy chief of fire prevention. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 479 Edmonds Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE B. Whenever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds. Page 3/6 C. Whenever the term "legal representative of the jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city attorney. D. Whenever the term "police" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds police department. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.020 Permits. A. Operational permits required under the city's fire code and regulated by the city shall be issued by the fire marshal. The application for the permit shall be accompanied by the full application fee in order to vest rights under the permit and to constitute a complete permit application. The permit fee shall be set by the city council annually by resolution or on such review cycle as the council, in its discretion, shall determine. All permits shall be renewed annually unless the specific time period is set forth when the permit is granted. No permit shall be transferable and each permit shall be issued on a single job, transaction, owner, or occupancy basis, except that the fire marshal is authorized to consolidate permits for a single location, building, or unit. B. In the event that the activity, location or risk associated with the activity requires a fire safety inspection in excess of the time estimated within the permit fee (one hour) an inspection fee equal to the actual cost to the city of providing the inspection shall be charged pursuant to ECDC 19.25.025. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection. A. Certain licenses and permits issued by the city include a fire department inspection. The cost of the permit may include an estimate of the normal time associated with the fire inspection. Where the permit does not include such an estimate, or when the estimate of time established within the ordinance is exceeded by the actual time spent inspecting a premises, location or activity, the actual cost of conducting the inspection shall be charged. The administrative services director is authorized to establish on an annual basis, in conjunction with or immediately following the budget process, a fee for the hourly charge associated with the provision of services by reasonable classifications of fire marshal and fire inspector. B. The permittee shall pay the actual charges of inspection, in addition to the permit fee associated with such activity. Licenses and permits requiring the actual payment of inspection charges include, but are not limited to, public amusement licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.32 ECC, cabaret dance licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.48 ECC, adult entertainment facility licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.52 ECC, business licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.72 ECC, and aircraft landing licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.80 ECC. C. No charge shall be levied against any department or agency of the city of Edmonds operating within the city's general fund. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals. A. The fire marshal shall have the authority to modify any of the provisions of the IFC or this chapter on written application by the owner, lessee, or his duly authorized agent when there are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict letter of the code. Approved modifications, including alternative materials and methods, shall observe the spirit of the code, preserve fire- and life -safety, secure the public health, and do substantial justice. A signed copy of approved modifications shall be promptly given to the applicant. B. Details of actions granting modifications and related interpretations shall be recorded and preserved in the records of the department of fire prevention to aid in conformance and uniform application of related codes, ordinances, and standards. C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the fire marshal to the hearing examiner. Such appeals shall be governed by the procedures set forth in Chapter 19.80 ECDC. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 480 7.1.a Edmonds Page 4/6 Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE 19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained throughout every building constructed under the International Residential Code containing five or more attached dwelling units. Residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in accordance with their approved listing in the dwelling. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. c M 19.25.036 Dwelling fire sprinkler systems and connection fees. a A. Where dwelling fire sprinkler systems are required to be installed in a dwelling (building containing one or two E dwelling units) constructed under the International Residential Code (IRC), a single water connection may provide N fire protection and domestic services through combination water lines utilizing an integrated fire and plumbing flow -through piping system described in IRC Appendix R (WAC 51-51-60105). L d B. Automatic sprinkler systems installed pursuant to subsection (A) of this section shall not be subject to the cost M differential from general facility charges for connection to the public water system when an up -sized meter is a required to meet the design flow rate for, and is solely attributable to, the installation of the automatic sprinkler E 0 system. All other costs, including the expense of a larger meter, a general facility charge attributable to the meter t� sized for the domestic service alone, and other permits and fees, shall remain the responsibility of the owner. 0 N C. When automatic sprinkler systems designed for life safety and installed pursuant to subsection (A) of this section a) are integrated and dependent upon the domestic water supply of the residential dwelling unit, the property owner .r shall be responsible for maintaining the service connection and paying for an adequate supply of water to the 0 residential dwelling unit. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3819 § 3, 2010]. c 19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies. L m All fire hydrant, water main and appurtenance installations shall meet the provisions of this chapter as well as other = applicable plans, standards and codes adopted by the city of Edmonds, as a condition of approval of subdivisions 2 and building permits. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. a 19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants. w A. For private development, owners shall be responsible for the replacement (upgrade) of the existing public main N (including fire hydrants and appurtenances) to city standard when identified by the city engineer as a condition of .. development approval. The city will pay the difference in material costs only between six inches and the size that is required to be installed only when the existing system is a looped system. a E B. A hydrant use permit issued by the public works director is required in order for any person or entity other than y fire department personnel to draw water from any fire hydrant. > co C. The installation of water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances to properties not previously served shall be sized in accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan, built to city standard and shall be at the benefited property owner's or developer's expense. .y D. Oversized water mains required for special use demands relating to a particular property or development shall be installed at the developer's or property owner's expense. L E. If the water mains installed pursuant to subsections (C) and (D) of this section provide service or benefits to E properties other than owned by the water main installer, latecomer agreements may be arranged between the city and 0 V the installer for the construction and dedication of the water facilities pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 35.91 r� RCW. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. N 19.25.050 Mains and service lines. c A. All public hydrants in single-family areas shall be supplied by not less than six-inch looped water mains. All E hydrants in areas other than single-family residential shall be supplied by not less than eight -inch looped water mains. Dead-end water mains to hydrants shall be at least eight inches in diameter, with the exception of mains up to r 50 feet long which may be no less than six inches in diameter. Q B. The service line from the water main to the hydrant shall be no less than six inches in diameter. Any service lines over 50 feet in length from water main to hydrant shall be no less than eight inches in diameter. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 481 7.1.a Edmonds Page 5/6 Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE C. When city streets, or state highways having water mains in the public right-of-way, are improved to permanent street or highway improvement standards, any water mains in the public right-of-way of said streets or highways that are substandard as to size or material according to applicable city standards shall be replaced with ductile iron water mains conforming to applicable city standards and plans. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. c M 19.25.055 Location of public hydrants. a A. Public hydrants are those owned by the city. E d B. All public fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Public hydrant spacing shall be measured along vehicle access routes. L d C. In areas zoned for single-family residential use, public hydrants shall be spaced no more than 600 feet apart. If M dead-end streets, or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be a installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 600 feet. E V D. In areas other than single-family residential, public fire hydrants shall be spaced an average of 300 feet apart. If r� dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 150 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be N installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 300 feet. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. a) A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.060 Location of private hydrants. c 0 tM A. A private hydrant is privately owned, but is subject to the use of the city for inspection and testing at reasonable 2- L times, and for fire suppression at any time. All private hydrants shall be connected to the city water main through a m privately owned and maintained double detector check valve assembly. _ B. All buildings except single-family dwellings that are located so that a portion is more than 200 feet from a street, as measured along vehicle access routes, shall have private fire hydrants located at the building. Single-family a dwellings with a fire -flow calculation area greater than 4,800 square feet may require a private hydrant. CD C. Buildings having required fire flows of 3,000 gallons per minute may have fire hydrants on one side of the N N building only. There shall never be fewer than two fire hydrants for any building larger than 5,000 square feet in the first floor area including covered parking and storage. When the required fire flow is 3,000 gallons per minute or a greater, the fire hydrants shall be served by a looped main around the building or complex of buildings. m D. Fire hydrants shall be spaced on an average 300 feet around the perimeter line, 50 feet out of the buildings. All hydrants shall be placed in locations accessible to fire department vehicles adjacent to fire apparatus access roads. T L The fire marshal shall determine the location of fire hydrants depending on utility, topography and building location for maximum fire protection. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.065 Hydrant specifications. a� > A. The installation of flush type hydrants (hydrants entirely below grade) is prohibited. m z B. Fire hydrants shall have two two -and -one -half -inch hose outlets and one four -and -one -half -inch pumper outlet. All outlets' ports shall have national standard thread. Additionally, the pumper outlet shall be provided with a E four -inch Storz adapter. Fire hydrants shall meet the American Water Works Association Standard No. C-502 and 0 current city standards. C. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices 0 N and city standards, and to the approval of the city engineer, who shall also approve the selection and use of all pipe fittings and valves. There shall be a foot valve installed between the service main and the hydrant sufficient to E permit the repair and replacement of the hydrant without disruption of water service. The foot valve shall be installed to city standards. The location of all such valves installed shall be properly and accurately marked on 2 as -built plans or drawings with generally acceptable engineering detail, two copies of which shall be furnished to the Q public works department. Valves shall be furnished with a standard valve box. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 482 Edmonds Page 6/6 Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE D. Hydrants shall stand plumb, be set to established street grade with the lowest outlet of the hydrant at least 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade and at least 36 inches of clear area around the hydrant for clearance of hydrant wrench on both outlets and on the control valve. The pumper port shall face the street, as determined by the fire marshal. E. Where reasonably necessary to protect a hydrant from damage, the fire marshal may require hydrants to be c� protected by two or more posts, eight inches in diameter by five feet long, made either of reinforced concrete or a steel. E d F. If there presently exist fire hydrants which do not conform to these requirements, they shall be replaced with conforming hydrants upon redevelopment or the timetable established by the city's comprehensive plan. L d G. No person shall plant any vegetation, erect any structure or perform any action which results in the obstruction of a fire hydrant for a distance of 50 feet along the immediate route of approach. The owner -occupant of any area in a which a hydrant is located shall be responsible for removing weed and tree growth from around the hydrant for a o distance of not less than five feet. The purpose of this section is to maintain clear approach and visual area around V the hydrant. H. The installation of the fire hydrants and mains may be accomplished by city capital contract, developers (as a 0 N a) condition of development) or public works department employees. All installations are to be approved by the city engineer. o I. Following the installation of fire hydrants, all pipes, valves and hydrants shall be pressure tested, purified, flushed tM i and sampled to meet the requirements of the American Water Works Association Standard No. C-502. [Ord. 4029 § m 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. _ V 19.25.070 Penalties. A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the IFC including those standards of the National Fire a Protection Association specifically referenced in the IFC as adopted and amended herein or fails to comply CD therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any order made thereunder, or who builds in violation of any N detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who fails to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by decision of the city's board of appeals or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the required time, shall severally for each and every such violation a and noncompliance, respectively, be guilty of a gross misdemeanor, punishable as provided in ECC 5.50.020. E m B. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it to continue; and all >, such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when co not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited conditions exist or are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. > .y C d t N L c� C �O♦ V r O N r a The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 483 7.1.a c a. E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX J Packet Pg. 484 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 485 U) D r c N 9 m M M Cn �r �Z �Cnv * 0ZU) D ZO-COo0 O0 DD� �m m�0 rnD t 0 TMEdmonds Water Source: Where our drinking water comes from Water Quality This report contains information about your drinking water, required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The bottom line is this: Our water is safe to drink. Our water quality meets or exceeds state and federal standards. long with most residents within the City of Edmonds, you receive your water from Everett's Spada Reservoir in the Sultan Basin, which is considered surface water. Our water source is disinfected with chlorine, which destroys Giardia, bacteria and viruses that may be present in the source water. Our water source also adds fluoride to prevent tooth decay. Everett Surface Water Source The Sultan Basin watershed, which fills Spada Reservoir, is protected and patrolled regularly. This watershed receives more than 160 inches of rain each year. Water from Spada Reservoir is routed by pipe to Chaplain Reservoir. There, this pristine high quality mountain water is treated at the City of Everett's filtration plant before being distributed for consumption. From the source, the greatest care is taken to ensure the water you use meets federal and state requirements as well as Everett's own high local standards. Along its way to your tap, the water is tested frequently for microbiological and chemical quality to ensure you receive safe water each time you use your faucet. The City of Everett provides this water for their own customers and numerous other water utilities. The City of Edmonds purchases Everett's water through Alderwood Water District, Alderwood Water District also supplies several other water utilities within Snohomish county. Edmonds Distribution System: Within the City of Edmonds water distribution system, there are three 1.5 million gallon and one 3.0 million gallon reservoirs. There are numerous connections throughout the Edmonds water system to other water systems including Seattle, Lynnwood, and Olympic View Water and Sewer District in case additional water is needed. The City of Edmonds water system identification number is 22500U, issued by the State of Washington Department of Health. 7.1.a 14 2014 Water Quality Monitoring The 2014 water quality monitoring results listed in the following tables show no contaminants were measured at or above allowable levels. The sources of all drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals, which can be vulnerable to contamination. In Edmonds water supply, these potential contaminants and their sources include: Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, from wildlife; Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which are naturally occurring, and; Organic contaminants, which are by-products of the water chlorinataing processes. Managing the Distribution System key to maintaining good water quality is effectively managing the water distribution system. It is important for water to remain fresh and retain sufficient chlorine for disinfection. The City has a flushing program and also has a cross - connection prevention program designed to keep any contaminants coming from homes and businesses from entering the drinking water system. Please call us at 425.771-0235 if you would like more information on the water system. 2014 WATER QUALITY DATA Possible Water Quality Concerns Parameter Units EPA's Allowable Limits Alderwood Water Typical Sources Comply MCLG MCL RANGE OR AVERAGE VALUE OR OTHER OTHER HIGHEST RESULT Fluoride ppm 2 4 0.2 - 0.9 0.8 Dental additive Yes Nitrate ppm 10 10 0.011 - 0.086 0.046 Erosion from Yes natural deposits % of positive samples % 0 5% 0.0% Naturally for Total Coliform per month None present in Yes Bacteria the environment Microbial Parameters (Measured in Edmonds Distribution System) % of positive samples % 0 5% 0.0% Naturally for Total Coliform per month None present in Yes Bacteria the environment Turbidity, inorganics, and Microbial Contaminants Turbidity I NTU I N/A TT 1 100% 1 0.11 Soil Erosion Yes Turbidity is a measure of the amount of particulates in water measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU). Particulates in water can include bacteria, viruses and protozoans that can cause disease. Turbidity measurements are used to determine the effectiveness of the treatment processes used to remove these particulates. Values reported are the lowest monthly percentage of samples that met the EPA turbidity limit and the highest single filtered water turbidity measurement obtained during the year. In 2014, no filtered water turbidity results were above the EPA 0.3 NTU limit so the lowest percentage was 100%. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level: The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology. MCLG = Maximum Contaminant Level Goal: The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Unit: The unit of measurement for turbidity. Detected Unregulated Contaminants TT = Treatment Technique: A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. The turbidity MCL that applies to the Tolt water supply is 5 NTU. AL = Action Level: The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow (for lead and copper monitoring results). N/A - Not Applicable (EPA has not established these goals). ND - Not Detected. NR - Not Regulated (these substances are not regulated by EPA). ppm = Parts per Million: (One part of a particular contaminant is present for every million parts of water). ppb = Parts per Billion: (One part of a particular contaminant is present for every billion parts of water). Conversions: 1 part per million (ppm) =1 mg/L 1 ppm =1000 ppb 1 part per billion (ppb) =1 ug/L 1 mg/L =1000 ug/L Parameter Units Ideal Level/Goal Edmonds Water Typical Sources (MCLG) Range Average Bromodichloromethane',' ppb 0 1.5 - 2.6 1.9 Disinfection by product from chlorine Chloroform trichloromethane 1z ppb 300 21.8 - 54.1 40.2 Total Trihalamethanes (TTHM)' ppb See Note 3 16.4 - 58.1 44.2 Dichloroacetic Acid',' ppb 0 3.2 -14.3 8.1 Trichloroacetic Acid' 1 ppb 1 300 117.5 - 22.91 20.9 Haloacetic Acids HAA5' I ppb I See Note 4 124.8 - 37.31 29 'These substances are disinfection by-products which must be monitored to determine compliance with the USEPA Stage 1 and Stage 2 Disinfectants/Disinfection By-products Rules (Stage 2 D/DBPR). 2 Includes results for 16 study sites and four additional sites that are monitored for compliance with current regulations. The study sites were monitored during October and December 2007 as part of a required study to identify new distribution system monitoring sites. This study known as the initial distribution system evaluation, or IDSE, and will continue through August 2008. The IDSE is required by the Stage 2 D/DBPR regulations. 'The MCL for TTHM is 80 ppb. 'The MCL for HAA5 is 60 ppb. Voluntary Information Parameter Everett Water Results Units Range Detected Average Value Alkalinity' ppm 12.8 - 21.6 16.6 Aluminum' ppm 0.01 -0.09 0.02 Arsenic' ppb < 0.1 - 0.3 0.2 Calcium Hardness' ppm' 7.4 -12.4 9.2 pH' S.u. 7.5 - 9.1 7.9 Sodium' ppm 5.5 - 6.7 6.0 Total Hardness' ppm' 9.9 -14.8 12.0 'Results are from samples collected from 26 locations in Everett's distribution system 'Arsenic and Sodium were monitored at the treatment plant effluent. 'Hardness and alkalinity units are in ppm as CaCO3 (calcium carbonate equivalent units). Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidium is a one -celled intestinal parasite that if ingested may cause diarrhea, fever, and other gastrointestinal distress. It can be found in all of Washington's rivers, streams, and lakes and comes from animal or human wastes deposited in the watershed. Cryptosporidium is resistant to chlorine, but is removed by effective filtration and sedimentation treatment such as that used by Everett. It can also be inactivated by certain types of alternate disinfection processes such as ozonation and UV light contactors. Past monitoring results suggest that Cryptosporidium is present in Everett's source only occasionally and atvery low concentrations. In 2014, Everett collected monthly Cryptosporidium oocyst samples from the source water at the plant intakes. None were detected. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline by calling t-800.426.4791. Information from the EPA To ensure tap water is safe to drink, EPA adopts regulations setting water quality standards for public water systems. The Federal Food and Drug Administration regulates contaminants in bottled water and is responsible for providing the same level of public health protection. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791). 2014 Annual Water Use Efficiency Summary The Edmonds water system is fully metered. The State require: water suppliers maintain their Distribution System Leakage (DSL) percent or less. The State also recognizes that a certain amount of le is expected and unavoidable. Total water purchased 1,064,929,096 gallons Total authorized & qualified uses 977,983,820 gallons Distribution System Leakage (DSL) 86,945,276 gallons DSL percentage of total water 8.2% 3 year annual average 8.7% *DSL refers to all the water that could not be accounted for, and can be attr to water main breaks, small ongoing leaks, meter inaccuracies, and water For further information see our website at http://edmondswa.go% USEPA Required Lead Statement The USEPA drinking water regulations require this statement be include( the lead and copper sampling results regardless of the levels observed: If pr, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especial pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is prir from materials and components associated with service line and plumbing. The city of Edmonds Utilities Division is responsib providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the v of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exp by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to two minutes before using for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in dit water, testing methods and steps you can take to minimize your exp is available from the safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http..//wv% gov/safewater/lead. Lead , Copper, and pH `m a E 0 V r 0 N am z a Oi c �L 0 N 2 0 IL- N a to a' d rn . L d .N C EPA Regulations Everett Water Resu Z Parameter Major source Units 90th Homes i Ideal Action Level/Goal Level % Exceeding Ci CL (MCLG) (AL) Level the AL E Copper Plumbing, erosion of ppm 1.3 1.3 0.109 None 0 natural deposits Lead Plumbing, erosion of pp b 0 15 2 0 of 107 natural deposits (0.0%) O USEPA and state regulations require systems to monitor for the presence of lead and copper N three years. Everett and many of the systems it supplies conduct lead and copper monitoring ++ their combined service area as a regional group. The above data was collected in 2012. The r round of required regional tap sampling will be conducted in the summer of 2015. The 90th°/ is the highest result obtained in 90 percent of the samples collected when the results are ranl E in order from lowest to highest. In the past, the results for water tested before it enters hous( t plumbing were even lower the the tap results. This indicates that there is virtually no lead or i V in the water, but household plumbing may contribute to the presence of lead and copper at tf r Soda ash is added Daily Avg Min Daily Avg Minimum r+ Q PH to reduce water s u Avg corrosivity by increasing PH and alkalinity 7.6 7.4 7.6 7.4 The Washington State Dept. of Health requires Everett to oper program at or above a minimum daily average pH of 7.4. The packet Pg. 487 for more than nine days every six months. In 2013, the averag 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX K Packet Pg. 488 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 489 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS COLIFORM MONITORING PLAN � aF EDP O v Ul) Page i Packet Pg. 490 7.1.a TABLE OF CONTENTS COLIFORM MONITORING SUMMARY (IF SAMPLE TESTS POSITIVE) pg.4 General Information 4 Summary 4 Coliform Present 4 Coliform and E. coli Present 5 CITY OF EDMONDS WATER SYSTEM OVERVIEW b REVISED TOTAL COLT FORM RULE 7 General Information 7 BACTERIA 7 Coliform Bacteria 7 Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform, and E. coli 8 Unsatisfactory Cali Form Sample Result 8 SAMPLES 8 Sampling Requirements 8 Source and Reservoir Samples 8 Selecting Sample Sites 8 E. COLI PRESENT ROUTINE AND REPEAT SAMPLES 9 Responding to an E. coli-present Sample Result 9 E. coli Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) 9 Collection of Repeat Samples 10 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION TIER 1, TIER 2, TIER 3 10 Public Notification Requirements 10 E. coli MCL violation — issued within 24 hours (Tier 1) 10 Treatment technique violation — Issued within 30 days (Tier 2) 10 Monitoring violation — Issued within one year (Tier 3 ) 10 Reporting violation — issued within one year (Tier 3) l0 TREATMENT TECHNIQUE TRIGGER AND ASSESSMENTS, LEVEL 1 & 2 Treatment Technique Trigger 1 1 Level 1 Assessment l 1 Level 2 Assessment l 1 Three pares of an assessment include 1 Page 2 c IL E d co L d r as .y c as L E 0 c.� ti 0 N c m E a Packet Pg. 491 7.1.a Investigation 12 Discussion 12 Corrective action 1? Sanitary Defect 12 Defects 12 PUMP STATION LOCATION 13 RESERVOIR LOCATIONS 13 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE (PRV) LOCATIONS 13 SAMPLE STAND LOCATIONS 14 REPEAT SAMPLE LOCATIONS 15 KEY CONTACTS 16,17 City of Edmonds 16 Water Utilities 16 Department of Health 16 Hospitals 16 Public School 17 Private School 17 Media 17 APPENDICES Appendix A Sample Site Map Appendix B Bacteriological Sampling Procedure Appendix C Media Notification Appendix D Boil Water Notice Appendix E Revised Total Coliform Rule Level 1 & 2 Assessment Page 3 Packet Pg. 492 7.1.a COLIFORM MONITORING SUMMARY (IF SAMPLE TESTS POSITIVE) General Information Edmonds water system identification number is: 2250OU Address: 7110 21 Wh St. S.W., Edmonds, WA. 98026 Phone: 425-771-0235 Emergency: 425-309-9867 Monthly samples required: 30 Monthly samples taken to represent the distribution system: 35 Laboratory name: Everett Environmental Laboratory Laboratory Phone: 425-257-8230 Summary 'Cake 35 routine Coliform Bacteria water samples per month. Routine sample results should show "Satisfactory" from the lab, if so, then no additional testing is needed. Coliform Present If laboratory calls and says the sample has `-Total Coliform Present" but is waiting to see if sample has E. coli present then: 1. Notify Water Lead, Water Manager, Public Works Director.. DOH ?. FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination. 3. Take 3 repeat samples, (one from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg. 10, 15 } It'sample shows "Unsatisfactory, Total Coliform Present" then: 1. Notify Water Lead. Water Manager, Public Works Director, DOH 2. FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination, 3. Take 3 repeat samples, (one from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg.10, 15 } If all repeat samples test "Satisfactory', negative For total Coliform, then no further samples are needed. If 2 or more "Total Coliform Present" results in the same month: Page 4 Packet Pg. 493 7.1.a Conduct an Assessment: (Treatment Technique Trigger) Level 1: A water system evaluation done by a knowledgeable operator to "Find and Fix" the contamination source. (see pg.I 1) Level 2 (instead of Level 1): If a second Level 1 Treatment Technique Trigger happens within a 12 month rolling period. A water system evaluation done by a Water Distribution Manager 2 (WDM2) or higher, an Engineer. or Health staff: to '`Find and Fix" the contamination source. (see pg, 11) Coliform and E. coli Present If routine sample or repeat sample shows "Unsatisfactory, Total Coliform Present" and "E. coli present" then: 1. Notify Water Lead, Water Manager, Public Works Director. DOH 2. FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination. 3. Take 3 repeat samples, (one from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg. 10, 15 ) 4. Conduct an Assessment: (Treatment Technique Trigger) Level 2 (instead of Level 1): A water system evaluation done by a Water Distribution Manager 2 (WDM2) or higher. an Engineer, or Health staff, to "Find and Fix" the contamination source. (see pg. 1 l ) 5. Public Notification, within 24 hours if 2 related samples test positive for total coliform bacteria and there is E. coli bacteria in one or more of the samples. (see pg. 10) If sample shows "Unsatisfactory, Total Coliform Present" and "E. coli absent" then: Notify Water Lead. Water Manager, Public Works Director FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination. Take 3 repeat samples. tone from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg. 10, 15 ) Repeat until sample tests "Satisfactory" Page 5 Packet Pg. 494 7.1.a City of Edmonds (COE) buys its water from Alderwood Water District. COE's service area is approximately 7.7 square miles and includes a population of approximately 30,354 with approximately 10,229 service connections. The service area is located in Southern Snohomish County. The surrounding purveyors include the City of Lynnwood, City of Mountlake Terrace. and Olympic View Water District. The City of Edmonds has interties with Lynnwood, Olympic View Water District and Seattle Public; Utilities for use in emergency situations only. CO has four reservoirs with a total volume of 7.5 MG in the direct service area to provide equalizing storage and fire flows. COE has 36 sample stands for routine coliform compliance monitoring. Sample stands are used to overcome the problems of gaining daily access to public and private premises for water quality sampling. These stands are located to represent different population concentrations, sources of supply, pressure zones and storage facilities so that representative water samples can be collected. COE's distribution system is comprised of over 139 miles of water supply and distribution mains, nearly 1,086 hydrants and 22 pressure reducing stations. Page 6 Packet Pg. 495 7.1.a REVISED TOTAL COLIFORM RULE General Information On April 1, 2016, the federal Revised Total Conform Rule (RTCR) replaced the 1989 Total Coliform Rule (TCR). The Revised Total Coliform Rule requires systems vulnerable to contamination to "find and fix" problems and pathways that could allow pathogens to enter the distribution system. Routine coliform samples are to be collected from representative points in the distribution system at regular time intervals. Public water systems are required to deliver safe and reliable drinking water to their customers 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. If the water supply becomes contaminated, consumers can become seriously ill. Fortunately. public water systems take many steps to ensure that the public has safe. reliable drinking water. One of the most important steps is to regularly test the water for coliform bacteria. This coliform monitoring plan will enable water operators to use laboratory and economical tests to evaluate the microbial water quality of the water system. These tests help ensure the water provided to customers is free of disease -causing organisms. BACTERIA Coliform Bacteria Coliform bacteria are organisms that are present in the environment and in the feces of all warm-blooded animals and humans. Coliform bacteria will not likely cause illness. However, their presence in drinking water indicates that disease -causing organisms (pathogens) could be in the water system, Most pathogens that can contaminate water supplies come from the feces of humans or animals. Testing drinking water for all possible pathogens is complex, time-consuming, and expensive. It is relatively easy and inexpensive to test for coliform bacteria. If coliform bacteria are found in a water sample, water system operators work to find the source of contamination and restore safe drinking water_ There are three different groups of coliform bacteria; each has a different level of risk. The three groups are; total coliform, fecal coliform and E. tali. Page 7 Packet Pg. 496 7.1.a Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform, and E. coli Total coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli are all indicators of drinking water duality. The total coliform group is a large collection of different kinds of bacteria. Fecal coliforms are types of total coliform that mostly exist in feces. E. coli is a sub -group of fecal coliform. When a water sample is sent to a lab, it is tested for total coliform. If total coliform is present, the sample will also be tested for either fecal coliform or E. coli. depending on the lab testing method. Unsatisfactory Coliform Sample Result Water systems are required to submit a water system assessment report to the Department of Health any time there is an unsatisfactory coliform sample result. SAMPLES Samnlina Reg uirements Population, reported on the Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) form, determines how many samples are taken per month. Edmonds has a population of 30,354, as of 2014. Population from 25,001 — 33,000 requires a minimum of 30 routine coliform samples per month. Source and Reservoir Samples The Department of health recommends collecting samples from the source and the storage reservoirs on a regular basis. Be sure to mark these samples as "investigative", they don't count as compliance samples. Selecting Sample Sites When selecting sample sites, using a customer tap as a sample site may not accurately reflect conditions in the distribution system. During routine and repeat sampling it may be determined that a site no longer represents the conditions within the distribution system., simply remove this site from the Plan and replace it with a site that better represents the conditions within the distribution system. Sample sites to avoid. Page 8 Packet Pg. 497 7.1.a Swivel faucets Hot/Cold mixing faucets. (faucets with a single lever) Drinking fountains Janitorial sinks Frost -free hose bibs Leaking or spraying faucets Faucets below ground or near ground level Faucets served by home filters or other home treatment systems Fire hydrants E. COLI PRESENT ROUTINE AND REPEAT SAMPLES Responding to an E. coli-present Sample Result The presence of E. coli bacteria in the distribution system will create significant challenges for us and our customers. We may be required or choose to advise our customers to boil their drinking water or use bottled water. Our customers may not he able to drink their tap water while we investigate the problem or pursue corrective action. The Revised Total Coliform Rule requires immediate public notification (within 24 hours) when two related samples (a routine and one or more of its corresponding repeat samples) test positive for total coliform bacteria, and there is E. coli bacteria in one or more of the samples. The lab analyzes all unsatisfactory samples collected from the distribution system for the presence of E. coli bacteria. E. coli Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL� The RTCR calls the acute Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) an "F.coli MCL". An E.coli MCL violation can occur four ways: 1. A total coliform-present repeat sample follows an E. coli-present routine sample. 2, An E. coli-present routine sample follows a total coliform-present routine sample. 3, The lab fails to test a total colifonn-present repeat sample for E.coli. 4. A system fails to take 3 repeat samples following an E. coli-present routine sample. Page 9 Packet Pg. 498 7.1.a Collection of Repeat Samples The Revised Total Coliform Rule requires the collection of repeat samples within 24 hours when a routine distribution system sample is unsatisfactory. 3 repeat samples must be taken for each unsatisfactory routine sample. r One from the same tap as the original unsatisfactory routine sample. • One from an active service within five active connections upstream from the original routine sample. • One from an active service within five active connections downstream from the original unsatisfactory sample location. Or may use alternative sampling locations in lieu of the requirement to collect at least one repeat sample upstream and one downstream of the original sampling site. Repeat monitoring locations that are believed to be representative of a pathway for contamination into the distribution system may be used. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION TIER 1, TIER 2, TIER 3 Public Notification Requirements E. coli MCL violation - Issued within 24 hours (Tier 1) Routine total coliform - positive; repeat E. coli - positive. Routine E. coli - positive; repeat total coliform - positive. Routine E. coli - positive; system fails to take all repeat samples. Repeat total coliform - positive; sample not tested for E. coli. Treatment technique violation - Issued within 30 days (Tier 2) System fails to conduct a required assessment within 30 days of the treatment technique trigger. System fails to correct a sanitary defect within required timeframe_ Monitoring violation_- Issued within one year (Tier 3) System fails to collect all required routine samples. Routine total coliform - positive; sample not tested for E. coli. Reporting violation - Issued within one year (Tier 3) System fails to submit a monitoring, report or completed assessment form in a timely manner. Page 10 Packet Pg. 499 7.1.a System fails to notify D011 of an E. tali — positive sample in a timely manner. TREATMENT TECHNIQUE TRIGGER AND ASSESSMENTS, LEVEL I & 2 Treatment Technique Trigger A treatment technique trigger is a situation that requires a water system to take action. RTCR requires water systems to conduct an assessment to `find and fix" any sanitary defects whenever a treatment technique trigger occurs, There are two assessment levels. Both evaluate the entire system from the sample collection point to the source of supply. We should anticipate that a treatment technique trigger might occur any time you collect routine and repeat samples. Therefore we should be ready to start a system evaluation as soon as the lab notifies us of total coliform-present. Level l Assessment A basic water system evaluation can be done by an owner. certified operator, or a knowledgeable person. A level 1 treatment technique trigger occurs any time a water system • Collects fewer than 40 routine samples a month and has 2 or more total coliform-present results the same month. ■ Collects 40 or more routine samples a month and has total coliform- present results in more than 5 percent of its routine and repeat samples. • Fails to collect 3 repeats for every total toll -form -present routine sample. Level 2 Assessment A complex evaluation that only a person with state -required qualifications. such as an engineer, certified operator (WDM2 or higher), or state of local health staff can do. A level 2 treatment technique trigger occurs when a water system has; ■ An E. coli MC L violation Page 1 I Packet Pg. 500 7.1.a A second Level l treatment technique trigger within a rolling. 12 month period. Three parts of an assessment include: Investigation: Identify any defects that allow coliforni to enter the distribution system. Discussion: Evaluate what you identified during the assessment that might have allowed the contamination to occur and the corrective action needed to fix it. Corrective action: Record the steps you took or will take to fix the sanitary defect that allowed the contamination to occur. When correcting contamination problems The Department of Health uses two terms that should be defined. "sanitary defects" and "defects". Sanitary Defect: is a pathway for contaminants to enter the water system. This may be as simple as a missing reservoir vent screen or a poorly sealed hatch, or as substantial as a failing reservoir. Corrective action for a sanitary defect could be as simple as installing a new screen on a reservoir vent or replacing the sea[ an a hatch, or as substantial as building a new reservoir. Defects: are issues identified during an assessment that could have caused positive coliform samples such as an improper sampling technique such as rinsing out a bottle before collecting a sample. Corrective action for a defect might be as simple as training on correct sampling techniques for the person who collects water samples. Page 12 Packet Pg. 501 7.1.a PUMP STATION LOCATION LOCATION Five Corners Pump Station 84 & Bowdoin Way RESERVOIR LOCATIONS Tank # (size) Address Inspected Cleaning Five Corners 1.5 mg 84` & Bowdoin Way Weekly Five Years Five Corners 3.0 mg 84` & Bowdoin Way Weekly Five Years Yost Park 1.5 mg 9601 Bowdoin Way Weekly Five Years Seaview 1.5 mg 185" & 90` Ave Weekly Five Years PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE (PRV) LOCATIONS PRV STATION NO. LOCATION MAIN SIZE 1 72° W & No Meadowdale 4 2 68 & No Meadowdale 4 3 7082 Meadowdale Bch Rd 6 4 74 & Meadowdale Bch Rd 4 5 Braemar Dr & 76th 6 6 176" & 76th 6 7 188 & 76th 6 8 80` & 184 St 8 9 84` & 184` St 4 10 88` & 185' St 6 11 8900 & 188th 6 12 89` & 192 ld St SW 4 13 12 & Main St 6 14 OIympic & Main St 6 15 9` & Pine St 4 16 Alder -wood Water meter vault 12 17 198 & 99 4 Page 13 Packet Pg. 502 7.1.a SAMPLE STAND LOCATIONS Sample Stand # Location. Sample Stand # Location lot 7707 203' St SW 201 242" & 78 Pl W 102 21 215 St. SW T4 202 7909 238' 5t 5W 103 814 75 Ave W 22 203 415 7'h Ave No 104 7713 234 St SW 204 8'h & Caspers St 105 CL2 Shack 1 faucet 205 1412 Olympic Ave 106 740 Elm St 206 1045 Daley St 107 "A" Ave & Pine St 207 401 12 Ave No 108 539 3' Ave So 208 20709 Maplewood Drive 109 220 Railroad Ave 209 20408 86` PI W 110 725 7` Ave No 210 21626 88h Ave W 111 1429 10` Pl No 211 20924 81" PI W 112 8500 186 St SW 212 19921 8 1 " PI W 8329 Sierra Drive 113 8302 Talbot Rd 213 114 18301 76 Ave W 214 19128 92" Ave W 115 178I2 72" Ave W 215 18119 Andover St 116 6900 Meadowdale Bch Rd 216 7506 180" St SW 117 16510 72" Ave W 217 680I No Meadowdale Rd 118 16340 75 PI W 218 663 l 172 nd St SW M C •L a� x a N N C CU a r N U) L a� .y a� aD L Q E 0 U ti r O N r C 0 E t V f3 r Page 14 Packet Pg. 503 7.1.a 0 c v 3 3 ❑ z �z �.�I33 �d`0 y �y V)Vv ) V� On¢rid CIA oe C N o d w ln a] . o_ann� cv a�a'-)N N NNW) N w N a O^ m N O w N N N M C) M rl) O C) m a = 10= d N N Ol 00 �G [� Q C• N r• M DO 00 00 N oO DO 00 o0 — ^ � C/� E — A C/) C4 R. ¢ Cn O un � C o0 47 Q ►- a� 7 d G. `� � r. c '� C� C•i m a �m ��_ �00�-,a0ocovrn_�vo�an � C) u ❑ r%I O, N 0w0 O Q N C oa N m CDCD -- Q ov �G ^ In Sn .-, O oo a M CD C:) CD t- r7 00 00 N ^ vs ut N N 00 a c N r+� 'r 4'] g n o0 O< O N C'1 'n 'G r,a0 acaQoaC)a _ .. .. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q C 3 33 � 33�3 dd-�Qc. mW)Ln� 'Ln �n — r- N N N r- Ma,`°aM•o� N N=WoCDri�_N C rV N m m N 1- (7% �10 r- C (> Q N N CI �,CmNma Qm � oa0ar��O n n N N — ^ i• m ,O r- o0 00 C1 j >' a .ti 3 r/S U] ❑ r a rn �. v] ❑° Z U a j U j > Q .urnr� 3d<Qsd_ a¢db¢°" r��nood � - N rn ❑ G 00 d n n n C- NNNr,4=00 r - .NF�Moo ❑,a —7—r;NMana+nN�ncN,a= u� 7 0a �n 'T r'- .t �-- " C) in C) N �n 00 N 00 t- 0p tia �a n C- n n Ch --• C� N 00 ^ ^ 00 -- - a C N m T V-� r- C31, C- r4 m� kn do r- w r 'JR cd a am C m O 2 C� 7 IL N N N C R a Co .y C O L d Q. 0 c.� ti 0 N C m Q Packet Pg. 504 7.1.a KEY CONTACTS City of Edmonds Phil Williams (Director of Public Works) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1634 Cell 425-582-3058 Jim Waite (Water / Sewer Manager) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1649 Cell 425-870-0617 Kris Kuhnhausen (Water Lead) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1647 Cell 425-231-0324 Jeff Kobylk (Water Quality Technician) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1644 Cell 425-563-3114 Water Utilities Alderwood Water/Sewer District 425-743-4605 Olympic View Water /Sewer District 425-774-7769 City of Everett 425-2.57-8878 Lynn Kirby (Water Quality Engineer) 206-684-0216 Department of Health Northwest Region (Dent) 253-395-6750 DOH after hour I lotiine 877-481-4901 Ingrid Salmon (Coliform Program) 253-395-6775 Carol Stuckey (Coliform Program) 253-395-6775 Jim Nilson (Regional Engineer) 253-395-6764 Hospitals Swedish Edmonds Hospital 425-640-4190 a Page 16 Packet Pg. 505 7.1.a Public School Districts Edmonds School District 15 425-670-7244 Private Schools Edmonds Holly Rosary 425-778-3197 Laboratories Everett Environmental Laboratory 425-257-8230 SPU Water Quality Laboratory 206-684-7404 SPU Water Quality Chemistry (Brian Hoyt) 206-386-1102 AM Test (Redmond) 425-885-1664 Media Contacts Newspaper Contacts The Everett Herald 425-339-3089 The Seattle Times 206-652-6290 Seattle Post -In tell igencer 206-464-2994 Television Contacts ICING TV (Channel 5) 206-448-5555 KSTW TV (Channel 11) 206-572-5789 KIRO TV (Channel 7) 206-728-7777 KOMO TV (Channel 4) 206-443-4000 Radio Contacts KIRO (AM 710) 425-728-5450 KOMO (AM 1000) 425-443-4010 Page 17 Packet Pg. 506 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 507 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a KIII a a =1 17 /:I_1 Packet Pg. 508 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 509 7.1.a �3 w = i1 � ssnHSTw� I 3 City • Edmonds ' IS.. STSW a j r I 1 a 15 TH pF ' I s� 160T Iy Sample ST = 3 Nyr� � 9 a £ v61STI". 118 \\\\\ FPO ]62ND PL 4TH ST SW SWT RD i '163R[ I � 16 164TH PL SIN 65TH PL SW 217 \= 117 MEP m BERTO(4� gs �' 14 169168TH ST SIN _ 7Xg �{P' MEADOWDALE MS�/ jar � ------ 4' a 5T sw x o y 3 I3 3 Z 218 N p`3� 5Tr' 172ND ST 5W 1i1'3 �i 1]3RDS 5W 3 BFq 172�DPLSTL 2 GS B AFF s ¢ a 3R057 TgLBDr RD Pi. � 174TH S7 SW 16 FREDERICK PL �_3.75TH ST SW THOMAS m MOORE 3 SCHOOLS' G 176rX n SW x 3 �yifk I76TH 11 W b 3 3 178TH PL S Snohomis �� HST SW a n County PL SIN, o 1179TX PL S s = ,., 5 115 3 178TH PL SW n a C o — 180THPL5 .. 5 215 � 0.9N IOT� h 3 > 1STPLS 182NOQ 82ND S 1 P s 1815T 5T FL R�aO PLSW n O 114 182ND ST51 N 3 0 b 182ND P � FLq Q y ,�T(�WflrO 3 183RD ST5 y OZ IT STSW £ POST ` c r 3 W OFFICE I S� a tiQ %83RD PL L & 185TH PL Jg 112 N 5TH r 186TH PL SIN W 1867H 5T S 3 187TX PL SIN c x m F y'h 7TH S75W F 22 R,o 7TH ST S I e e Q H 168TH ST SIN SW d7H 5T SW LR O'T9pQ`' 3 a q 3 5 w 3 187TH PL SW 0 o j > > 188TH PL S W 4pJ� < Z 189TH PL SW '> i s 3 a ¢ i N PENNY LN i V 2 _ m a ,WATERS �`� BIAKE P s� 3 < y a o 189TH PL 9L It, I- W 189TH PL SW ? f 2P CHERRY ST 90TY'� 7y 91ST PL SW Q o LYNNDALE 214 m191srw 191S7 9 ELEMENTARYQ 190THSTSW a 190THST5 N G f 192NDSTSW n 1915T PL SW F 191STSTSW (2 MFRS 2 SA >+ 3 SI Oq 192ND PL SW 192ND ST ++ NORr > Qom' 3 n ¢ n 192N0 PLsw 192ND PL SW Oot1p). � HSTgF4M LNs '�FL >� C I N 193RD PL SW �+ 213 193RD PL SW 3 4 193RD PL 0 O S c<a m O1 m a 3 > O LSW 193RD 5T SW OR/ � G qtg. .0 194TH SW 194THPL5 x 3 � ¢ � 3 01 P4GE.7, O W '�tio111 �i'� j d N 94TH PLSW v c o 3 OOLY VE 9C Z n = Q .L U ET LL SW 1957H ST S_ g� F (G PUGET Wq 2 5 524 1 6TH ST SW d MELODVW 00P 197TH ST SW 196TH PLSW INDLEY LN 3 W 8TH w n ?� PL 197TH 57 SW .� C R VIEW D WAY aC 3 ry rn n HELM c B >. ROOKMERE ST u m.. x 19 HsT SW3 ^^� 198TH PL SW I.L 204 DOT S7 S �� 20M a VIEWMOOR PL EDMONDS ¢ LTNER M ISTA PL = VI ;TA Wq , F ■ SITER LN $� I '�,� 3 3 I 20157 ST SW n COMMUNITY 2i N 1 z(71 > ADE LN %ISTA 3 ` N v ALOHA WqY ¢ 2015T PL < > • COLLEGE 1 �o 2 LOHA ST x c ¢ 54 ' v P F > r SW x 202ND 5Tx ROL WA 11`0� l u SIERRA PL 2 2NDPL5ww w 3 G C 202ND PL SW 202ND ST SW a a o >< a$ 101 a C yJ2F0� = a■ oQ GLE S7 o i ¢ o x 03RD PC3T — J a "O w DALEY ST 18 206 DALEAq� ¢ &' W 1 ST S A n 0/< Ilr = FIRE < SPRA UE ST "' 207 ¢ 209 3 J 204 2 S�OLLEGE ��\10 E 7 4 s STATION Hummn rr I g zosTH vlsw 3 a 3 PLACE a� �'Qo I.rP 2 O EDM NOS ST y W ELF ENIENTARY N P `e4 CiTYV A4' B LLST iPark _ w p O67H 5W i U COUNTY >4 Ofq 4M HALL Sp PUBLIC FRANCIS m 208 `03 7 COURT V) �y 109 SST E y~ SAFETY i 7THPLSW m207TIA >+ COLLEGE L p h �AfNDERSON MA ST _ ,_,�. S zDTrH PL SW J PLACE MS +�+ DAVTON ST a DAY z ! + CENTER WADE AMES x 3 No �i, ST F 2C CU '^ < THEATRE ¢ A 209TH PLS 09TP WWTP w MAP EST YOst d > 3 p c� ¢ Memorial N~ _ £ < 211 3 l 3 3 3 x ALD s- Park m v g S 3 z 1rH 3 > i > 203 1'OS ""' t d .STS z i_ < WAL TS7 z = ¢ I e _ to o OEMR MR ST .WIN"5 � mCED P UN, OWELLWAY aMAGNOL LN SPRUCE ST Z O $ EDMONDS 212T Edl NoMELANDDR k213TH STSWWOODWAY H 99LCqFIT— S j LAUREL L > a epW /'/ ,L 213TLSWHEMLOCK x r ¢ D e Be Park < EN R ¢ /N I,yY214TH P I102 a 214TH PL SW 2157H 57 SW O PINE ST EAMONT LN 107 5TH PL S STSVd m > STEVENS 3 (� 21' o a 215TH PL SW 3 , HOSPITAL d p01NT EDWAR 3 PL o a u6TH PL SW 216TH STSW 6, > 216TH S r O x FORSYTH LN Q Q j 3 217TH ST SIN 3 � CHASE a c z v ¢ 00 u 21 0 jj i LAKE c $ n Q HosvrtAL ° N FIR a ISTH SCHOOL z r .+ p FIRST i 1�;( 219TX ST SIN EL41 < � r q 3 3 3 218TH ST BELLA COO RD o 11 ELM rO E s SEA 219TH SW p i i 219TH STSW � M ELM v 22 HST ~ -- " - 22 HST SW U B PL ,N12 3 _ WN PL 106 � I ,5W 1=30 -3 --, _ _ m� Ry5�s a 215T PL SW r O4 _ 22157 PL =. BIRCH PL � WESTGATE _ r 2215T PL5 >� BIRCH 5 ELEMENTARY 222ND ST SIN -ase 3 3 w o I e 3 Lake 222ND ST SIN > JJ'L a > 222N LSHAN PO P " Ci 3 3 AV zz3Rosrsw a Chase Park 3 e° Esperance i a e x 3 ? D BIRCH 3 3 III f� 3 Lake ozz3 Park 3ZZ3 SW > 13TH WAVSW 14THSTSW ¢ a a a 3'I i LPL sue` N e i I WAY sw F m ¢ —7 224TH ST SW I x 224TH 5T SW O 4TH PLSW `1 SI T O m 23 3 6 N LN pLGONOUIN RO ■ 226TH ST SIN n s STSW Z I 3 - 225TH PL SW a-- - nsTH ST Sw o „ 3 25TH PL SV LG 26TH PL 5 m 3 3 1 G ^ z 226T o S ill i 226TH ST SW G 3 man 2 nH P/ III a 2—sr SW _ m O 3 G�-r..228T N� TH ST 227TF1 STSW — �,L�TH PL F 226TH PL SIN 3 �� 3 = zz PLsw y 228TH sr5 3 1'03 x �P NOEE0. DR 119rN PL SWa ro c 96,�PE III u < j229TH ST 228TH STS yST7 Deer Park ■ 2 ^ x i_ x �2ga i rNsr 3 SLO Reserve 50EEPDaSHERWOOD o 104 ' m zzsTH PL SW m o s rri ELEMENTARY 3 23aTHSTAN 3 230THS75W 9rNpLSW 3 ?3 £ S0 3 231ST ST SIN 3 W p` i \ 2315T sw edO y r 232ND ST SW s IZ 232ND PLSW N 80ZN- 232NDST5 3 I I WACHUSETT RD m FRIARY ?O SCRIBER $L m nD s�y�'J4 3 3 11 j 232ND ST! Cf LAKE HS� 234TH PL5 _yIp,PL c u 233RD sr 5 �Q 3RD PL a �� 232ND PL SW = CL 2 ■ , 2 DPLS J�lf 234 STSW a 3 MADRONALNm 234TSW2.35TH PLS a2357H PL 5 104O Water Sample Sites 236TH PL SIN 236TH ST SW 36TH ST SINm�Edmonds 3 y 3 3 EEMDENOTARYG35TH P n 3 ¢ 1�� 0 3 y9j'F Lynnwood = 202 o I � a 238TH ST 5 j Q 3 237IN 238TH ST SW 11 J 99 LEER WA 239TH PLSW O , / Mountlake Terrace PLsp' 3 J 40T ST SW 7dnTw ST 5 Woodwa N\CK RD £ O Cemetary 3 240THP SW 240TH PL SW F y9yo a 2415T PL 5W j 3 Q n 2 ST SW W H. IST PLS $ ,AIST PL SW TEMgOz a King County � € o 3 > , 240TH PL SW p� 242 O sw ` Mathay Ilin r2011 Z W S O PL SW N Snohomish County �ti L 243 DPL SW1 N F a N ar AND I ND PL SW C -r F 244TH 5T SW 2A4TH ST SW - - 0.5 Miles June 2017 Packet Pg. 510 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 511 7.1.a /_1»=IQKv -a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 512 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 513 7.1.a Bacteriological Sampling Procedures 1. Sample site addresses are in the Bac-T Sample notebook in the meter shop. 2. Sample bottles and chlorine field test kits are also located in meter shop. Gather proper amount of sample bottles 3. Inspect sample bottles and do not use if bottle has broken seal, cracks, etc. Store bottles in ice cooler as you move from site to site. 4. Insure field test kit has proper amount of free and total DPD pillows. S. Take Seattle sample stand key to unlock Seattle sample stands. F. Meter box sampling tube is located in meter shop. Inspect for damage. 7. Disinfect sampling tube with chlorine solution at the shop. Spray entire sample tube inside and out. Spray inside of bag with chlorine solution. Place tube inside new plastic bag while transporting. $. Gather proper amount of DOH sample forms and fill out according to instructions on backside of forms- 9- Go to first location of sampling site. 10. Pull meter box cover and remove PVC cap off adapter on water meter. Place disposable rubber gloves on hands. Disinfect gloves with chlorine solution. Spray connections on meter and sample tube with chlorine solution. Connect sample tube to adapter on meter. 11. Let water run for at least two minutes or more. 12. Using chlorine test kit follow instructions accordingly: A. Fill the bottle to the 10-ml level on sample bottle in kit. B. Empty 10-ml DPD pillow (free) into bottle. Close lid. ShaKe until powder dissolves and wipe dry. C. Take blank sample bottle and insert into color meter test kit with white square pointing towards the front of the test kit and touch the 7-ero button to zero out. D Remove blank bottle and insert sample bottle with the DPD free pillow, white square pointing towards the front of the test kit. Touch read. This will tell you the free residual available in the water. E. Log this reading on the water sample Cl2 form. 13. Repeat procedures from #12 using the DPD (total) pillows to get the total residual results. Packet Pg. 514 7.1.a 14. When taking a bacteriological sample, A. Disinfect rubber gloves with chlorine solution {while on hands)- B. Remove sample bottle cap. Be careful not to touch the rim of the sample bottle or under cap. Keep all foreign items from entering sample bottle i.e.: dust, rain, dirt, etc. Take sample and quickly replace cap and record information on form. C. ❑O NOT RINSE BOTTLE OR POUR OUT CONTENTS. Bottle has a chlorine neutralizing chemical inside. D. Fill the sampling bottle to the shoulder jjust below the neck) of the bottle or the 100-ml line. very carefully, and seal tightly. E. Remove sample tube from meter. Disinfect sample tube adapter and inside of plastic cap with chlorine solution. Place plastic cap on adapter. F. Fill out bacteriological form and rubber band form around bottle. G. Go to next location. 15. When done taking samples disinfect inside and outside of sampling tube with C12 solution at the meter shop. Hang on wall to air dry. Repeat steps 10-14 for next address. Note: In case of a load sample. The fallowing are instructions for taking repeat samples: Go to site address where bad sample has been indicated by lab. 2. In the Bac-T sample notebook you will notice there are three sample sites in the gray shaded area under that site address. Those are the three site addresses where you will repeat the sampling procedures 1-13. 3. Takes samples to lab the same day the samples are taken. WordatalWaterlBarteriologmal Sampling Procedures Packet Pg. 515 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX C Packet Pg. 516 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 517 7.1.a 0 City of Edmonds Media Release Public Works and Utilities — 121 51n Ave N, Edmonds, WA FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 7 October 2016 To: Media Contact: Phil Williams, Public Works and Utilities Director Phi Lwilltam s edmondswa. ov , (425) 771-0235 BOIL -WATER ADVISORY ISSUED FOR (—) WATER SYSTEM/NEIGHBORHOOD IN EDMONDS Advisory Issued After Routine Testing Detects Unsafe Levels of (--) In Water; No illnesses Reported (Edmonds, WA) - The City of Edmonds in partnership with the Washington State Department of Health has issued a boil -water advisory today, October 7th, to some customers of the (location) neighborhood in Edmonds after potentially harmfully (E. coli) bacteria were detected in the water. This water system, which is (location), serves about ( number of ) people (number of homes). However, the advisory is only for the approximately (number) homes in (location). Boil -water notices will be hand -delivered to each affected home. "Quote from Public Works Director here (how/what was detected, how serious it is/any Packet Pg. 518 7.1.a illnesses/what concern to public is/what next steps are." ('Follow up releases should also address 'how did this happen/how can it be prevented from happening again?' Reassure public of processes in place to protect water supply.) Customers in zones not affected by the boil water advisory (those whose homes are location) will not receive boil water notices, but may visit the water services' website for more information. A map showing the affected service area is available on the website. Water Service Company name, which owns and operates the water system, is working closely with the Department of Health to track down the source of contamination, "Quote from health official (level of health concern/what public should do to protect itself/any reports of illness/symptoms to watch for)" The bacteria were found in routine water quality monitoring samples, E. tali can cause gastrointestinal illness. To kill the bacteria, the Department of Health recommends that residents boil tap water they'll use for drinking, brushing teeth, preparing food, making ice, and washing dishes, Water should be heated to a brisk boil for one minute and allowed to cool before use. The advisory will remain in effect until the water meets safe drinking water standards. Customers with questions about their water quality can call (Washington Water Service at 253- 851-4060 or toll free at 877-408-4060.) Updates can also be found on the City of Edmonds website (hotiink here) and Facebook page (hotlink here). Packet Pg. 519 7.1.a KV, c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 520 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 521 WARNING: Do not drink tap water without boiling it first! ❑ Fecal coliform ❑ E. coli bacteria ❑ Other: were detected in the water supply on: (date) Boiling kills bacteria and other organisms in the water: • Bring water to a rolling boil for one minute ■ Let water cool before using To avoid possible illness: use boiled or purchased bottled water for drinking, making Ice, brushing teeth, washing dishes, and food preparation until further notice. Contact your doctor, if you experience one or more of these symptoms: nausea, cramps, diarrhea, jaundice, headache and/or fatigue. People with chronic illnesses, infants and the elderly may be at higher risk and should seek medical advice. Water System: I.D.. County: Contact: Telephone: Date notice distributed: What is fecal coliform and E. coli? Fecal coliform and E. coli are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human or animal wastes. Microbes in these waters can cause short-term effects, such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches or other symptoms. They may pose a special health risk for infants, young children, some of the elderly, and people with severely compromised immune systems. How long will this warning be in effect? We will consult with the Washington State Department of Health about this incident. We will notify you when you no longer need to boil the water. Vea al reverso para la version en Espanol. October 2008 WARNING: Do not drink tap water without boiling it first! ❑ Fecal coliform ❑ E. coli bacteria ❑ Other: were detected in the water supply on: (date) Boiling kills bacteria and other organisms in the water: • Bring water to a rolling boil for one minute ■ Let water cool before using To avoid possible illness: use boiled or purchased bottled water for drinking, making ice, brushing teeth; washing dishes, and food preparation until further notice. Contact your doctor, if you experience one or more of these symptoms: nausea, cramps, diarrhea, jaundice, headache and/or fatigue. People with chronic illnesses, infants and the elderly may be at higher risk and should seek medical advice. Water System: I.D.. County: Contact: Telephone: Date notice distributed: What is fecal coliform and E. coli? Fecal coliform and E. coli are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human or animal wastes. Microbes in these waters can cause short-term effects, such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches or other symptoms. They may pose a special health risk for infants, young children, some of the elderly, and people with severely compromised immune systems. How tong will this warning be in effect? We will consult with the Washington State Department of Health about this incident. We will notify you when you no longer need to boil the water. Vea al reverso para la version en Espanol. October 2008 Cl Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water aa;eM dwoD L60Z ay; uo fulaeaH allgnd : 6ZZZ) Ueld uaa;sAS.aa;eM anlsuayaadwOO L40Z :;uauayaej4V ADVERTENCIA: iNo tome el agua de la Have sin antes hervirla! ❑ Bacteria coliforme fecal ❑ Bacteria E. coli ❑ otra: fueron encontradas en su sistema de agua: (el dia) Hervir el agua mata a las bacterias y otros organismos en el agua: • Ponga el agua en la estufa hasta que hierva y deje hervir el agua por un minuto • ❑eje enfriar el agua antes de usarla Para evitar posibles enfermedades y hasta nuevo aviso: use agua hervida o agua potable embotellada pars tomar, hacer hielo, limpiarse los dientes, lavar los platos y para preparar comidas. Hable con su doctor si usted tiene uno o mas de los siguientes sintomas: nausea, dolor estomacal, diarrea. ictericia, dolores de cabeza y10 cansancio. La gente con enfermedades cr6nicas, bebes y personas mayores de edad, pueden estar en situation de alto riesgo y deben consuitar con su medico o proveedores de servicios medicos. sistema de agua: I.D.. Condado: Contacto: Telefono: Fecha de notificacion: ZQue son las bacterias coliforme fecal y E. coli? Coliformes fecales o E. soli son bacterias cuya presencia indica que el agua esta contaminada con desechos humanos o de animales Microbios de esos desechos pueden causar diarrea, dolor estomacal, nausea, dolores de cabeza u otros sintomas. Pueden representar un peiigro para la salud de bebes, ninos y n0as de corta edad y personas con sistemas inmunologicos en alto riesgo. tPor cuanto tiempo va a estar en efecto esta advertencia? Vamos a consultar con el Departamento de Salud del estado de Washington acerca de este incidents. Le vamos a notificar cuando ya no sea necesario hervir el agua. ADVERTENCIA: iNo tome el agua de la Have sin antes hervirla! ❑ Bacteria coliforme fecal ❑ Bacteria E. coli ❑ Otra: fueron encontradas en su sistema de agua: (el di a) Hervir el agua mata a las bacterias y otros organismos en el agua: • Ponga el agua en la estufa pasta que hierva y deje hervir el agua par un minuto ■ Deje enfriar el agua antes de usarla Para evitar posibles enfermedades y hasta nuevo aviso: use agua hervida o agua potable embotellada para tomar, hacer hielo, limpiarse los dientes, lavar los platos y para preparar comidas. Hable con su doctor si usted tiene uno o mas de los siguientes sintomas: nausea, dolor estomacal, diarrea, ictericia, dolores de cabeza ylo cansancio. La gente con enfermedades cr6nicas, bebes y personas mayores de edad, pueden estar en situacion de alto riesgo y deben consultar con su medico o proveedores de servicios medicos. Sistema de agua: I.D.. Condado: Contacto: Telefono: Fecha de notificacion: 4Que son las bacterias coliforme fecal y E. Coll? Coliformes fecales o E. colt son bacterias cuya presencia indica que el agua esta contaminada con desechos humanas o de animales. Kcrobics de esos desechos pueden causar diarrea, dolor estomacal, nausea, dolores de cabeza u otros sintomas. Pueden representar un peligro para la salud de bebes, ninos y ninas de corta edad y personas con sistemas inmunologicos en alto riesgo. tPor cuanto tiempo va a estar en efecto esta advertencia? Vamos a consultar con el Departamento de Salud del estado de Washington acerca de este incidente. Le vamos a notificar cuando ya no sea necesario hervir el agua. M N Lf) a m M a See reverse side for ;English version. See reverse side for English version. 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 524 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 525 RTCR Level 1 Assessment Guidance Template 331 569, March 2016 Eastern 16201 East Indiana Avenue, Suite 1500 Region Spokane Ya0ey, WA 99216 Send your Northwest 20425 72nd Ave. South, Suite 310 assessment to: I Region Kent, WA 98032-2358 SouthWM PO Box 47823 Roan Olympia, WA 985134-7923 Phone 509.329.2100 Fax 509.329.2104 Email; marksteward@doh.vwa.gov Phone: 253.395.6750 Fax: 253395.6760 Email: dw.nwro@doh.wa.gov Phone: 360-236-3030 Fax: 360-664-8058 Email: swro.coli[3udoh.wa.gov Water System Name: Count Water System I 4: Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC): ORC Phone: Water System Mailing Address: ORC Address, City, State: Assessor Name: Assessor Address, City, State, Zip: Date(s) Assessment Completed: Your water system exceeded a treatment technique trigger for the Revised Total Coliform Rule. Assess the water system's condition and operation using this Level ! Assessment Template as a guide. Part A: Respond to each item below, identify corrective actions taken to address the issue(s) found. Part B: Summarize your findings and include an action plan with timetable for corrective actions not yet taken. For parts A and B, include additional information (photos or other documentation) as needed to depict assessment findings and corrective actions that have been completed. All assessment elements listed in this template must be addressed in your assessment. Systems with multiple facilities such as wells or storage tanks may need to provide additional pages. Within 34 days of learning of the treatment technique trigger, submit completed assessment documentation to your regional office and keep a copy in your water system files. Part A: Assessment Corrective Corrective action(s) taken & date taken action needed? 1. Site and Sampling Protocol 1a. Do you have a written coliform monitoringplan & sampIingprocedure ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No that ensures sam p Ies are representative of the d istri b ut i on sy stem? l b. Have there been any changes in samp I i n g conditions or procedures that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No I c. Inspect the sampling sites: - Are the sampling locations free of potential sources of X CD contamination? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA [IYes [I No - Are the sampling taps in good condition? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other. (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No Imly—ou Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water System Plan) (veld we;sAS aa;eM dWOO L6OZ atl; uo 6ulJeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld uaa;st S aa;eM anlsuatlaidwO3 L6OZ :}uewLioe;}d art A: Assessment Corrective Corrective action(s) taken & date taken action needed? . distribution 2a. Do you have procedures in place to ensure proper maintenance of the distribution system, including: - Appropriate pipe replacement and repair procedures ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Rep iace ment and repair of other distribution system components ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Regular flushing program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Routine vault inspections ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ N❑ - Fully implemented cross connection control program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Maintain positive pressure in all parts of the distribution system ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2b. Has there been any recently reported low pressure (<20 PSI) or El Yes[:] N❑ ❑Yes ❑ No complete loss of pressure in the distributions stem? 2c.1-Iave there been any changes in distribution conditions or operations ❑ Yes ❑ No that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2d.Inspect the distribution system: - Are there any visible line breaks or leaks? [I Yes El No [I❑ Yes No - Are there any observed unprotected cross connections? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Storage Facilities 3a. Does your water system have a water storage tank? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1 'no, skip to Section 4. 3b.Do you have procedures in place for periodic inspection and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [:)No maintenance of the exterior and interior of each storage facility? 3c. Have there been any changes in storage conditions or operations that ❑ Yes ❑ No may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes [—]No 3d.Inspect the storage facilities: - Does the tank have any cracks or other openings? ❑Yes ❑ No El Yes ❑ N❑ - Is the reservoir roof free of any unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the access hatch constructed and sealed to keep contaminants out? El Yes [I No ❑ Yes ❑ No - If there is an air vent on the storage tank, is it constructed to prevent the entry of contaminants? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the overflow line constructed to prevent contaminants from entering the tank? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - If the overflow line discharges into a storm drain, to surface water, or directly into a sanitary sewer, is it protected by a proper air gap'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes [] No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or otber security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ Na ti N Ln 6 IL m a L ; Ili 0o Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water System Plan) Part A; Assessment c�i cQ Corrective action needed? Corrective action(s) taken & date taken 4. Sou rce--Cround water ❑ Yes ❑ No 4a. Does your waters stem have a well orspring? If no, skip to Section 6. 4b.Do you comply with San itaU Control Area requirements (WAC 246- ❑ Yes ❑ No El Yes ❑ No 290-135(2)? 4c. Have there been any changes in source conditions or operations that Yes ❑ No may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No 4d. Inspect the source facilities: - Is the sanitary control area free of all potential sources of contamination? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Nu - Is the wellhead or spring box above grade with no potential for flooding? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the pressure tank water logged`? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No Is the well 1 cap sealed and watertight, and the well casing free of unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No - (For springs) Is the spring box (structure, hatch, and overflow) free of any unprotected openings'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ Na El N/A [I Yes ❑ No S. Treatment --Groundwater ❑ Yes ❑ No 5a. is any source continuously treated with a disinfectant? If no. skip to Section 6. 5b. Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance ❑ Yes El N° Yes [—]No of disinfection treatment facilities? 5c. Have there been any changes in treatment equipment or process that ❑ Yes ❑ No may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No 5d. Inspect the treatment facilities: - Is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yeas ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. Source —Surface Water Supply (watershed) ❑ Yes ❑ No 6a, Does your water system have a surface water supply? If no, skip to Section 8. 6b.Do you comply with Watershed Control Program requirements (WAC ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 246-290-135(4)? u 6c. Have there been any changes within the watershed or in raw water Yes No ❑ ❑ i conditions that may have contributed to the treatment technique D trigger? Describe: ❑Yes ❑ No V (veld we;sAS ia;eM dWOO L6OZ at4; uo OUIJeaH oilgnd : 6ZZZ) ueid WOlS (g aa;eM aAlsuatlaidwO3 L6OZ :}uewLioe}}d erf art A: Assessment Corrective Corrective action(s) taken & date taken action needed? Gd. Inspect the surface water intakcfheadworks: - is there evidence of problems at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - is there evidence of vandal ism or other security breaches at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Treatment --Surface Water 7a. Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance ❑ Yes ❑ No [—]Yes ❑ N❑ of surface water treatment facilities? 7b. Have there been any changes in treatment equipment or process that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? ❑escribe- ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 7c, Inspect the treatment facilities: - Is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Other assessment activities (describe): M N Ln 6 IL m a Part B. Assessment Summary and Action Plan with Timetable for corrective actions not yet taken ❑ ASSESSOR: CHECK HERE if you did not identify any issues that may have directly or indirectly caused or contributed to entry of coliform bacteria into the system, Corrective Actions Completed: ASSESSOR: Summarize the issues found and the corrective actions that have been completed and date completed I Describe issue found I Describe corrective action taken and mate completed Corrective Actions Not Completed: ASSESSOR: Describe the issues for which corrective actions have not yet been completed. Provide an action plan with timetable for completion. Describe issue found Describe planned corrective action and timetable for completion. Print Name of Assessor: OFFICE OF ❑RINKING WATER USE ONLY *Regional Office Reviewer: Assessment sufficient? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective actions completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No d ❑mments: 0 X CD rt tQ U1 Signature ofAssessar: Date of Review: Likely cause determined? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan included? ❑ Yes ❑ No Date: Sanitary defect(s) identified? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan approved? ❑ Yes ❑ No W Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water System Plan) v al RTCR Level 2 Assessment Guidance Template 331-570, Mari:0 2015 I I Easir�rn R. tJior► Send your Northwest assessment to: Region Sauthwc�st Region 16201 East Indiana Avenue, Suite 1500 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 20425 72nd Ave. South, Suite 310 Kent, WA 98032-2358 PO Box 47823 Olympia, WA 98504-7623 Phone, 509.329.2100 Fax 509,329,2104 Email: rnarks[_ewardith.wa.gov Phone- 253,395,6750 Fax: 253.395,6760 Email: dw.nwro@doh-wa.gov Phone: 360-236-3030 Fax- 360-664-8058 Email- swro.coli@doh.wa.gov Water System Name: County: Water System ID ft: ❑ erator in Responsible Charge (ORQ: ORC Phone: Water System Mailing Address: ❑RC Address, City, State: Assessor Name: Assessor is: WDM-2, 3, or 4 ❑ En ineer ❑LHJ Assessor Address, City, State, Zip: Date(s) Assessment Completed: iv 0 X m C4 in W 3 Your water system exceeded a treatment technique trigger for the Revised Total Col iform Rule. Assess the water system's condition and operation using this Level 2 Assessment Template as a guide. Part A: Respond to each item below. Identify corrective actions taken to address the issue(s) found. Part g: Summarize your findings and include an action plan with timetable for corrective actions not yet taken. For parts A and B, include additional information (photos or other documentation) as needed to depict assessment findings and corrective actions that have been completed. All assessment_ elements listed in this template must be addressed in your assessment. Systems with multiple facilities such as wells or storage tanks may need to provide additional pages. Within 30 days of learning of the treatment technique trigger, submit completed assessment documentation to your regional office and keep a copy in your water system files. Part A: Assessment Corrective action needed? Corrective action(s) taken & date taken 1. Site and Sampling Protocol la, Do you have a written coliform monitoring lan & sampling procedure ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No that ensures samp Ies are re resentative of the distributions stem? l b. Do you have a program in place that ensures that all sample collectors ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes El No are trained before bein allowed to collect compliance samples? lc. Do you regularly monitor the condition of each routine and repeat ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No sample site to ensure that no site will contaminate the sample? 1 d. Was the sample collected by a trained, qualified person? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 1 e. Did the sampler follow your monitoring plan and sampling procedure? ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No V Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water System Plan) (veld we;sAS ia;eM dWOO L6OZ atll uo 6ulJeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld WOlSAS aaleM anlsuatlaidwO3 L6OZ :tuewLioe}}d A: Assessment CorPart action needed? action needed? Corrective actions taken & date taken ( � 1 f. Was the sample collected representative of the water in the distribution ❑yes ❑ No ❑Yes [I No system? l g. Have there been any changes in sampling conditions or procedures that [:]Yes ❑ No [:]Yes [:]No may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 1 h. Inspect the sampling sites: - Are the sampling locations free of potential sources of contamination? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Are the sampling taps in good condition? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Distribution 2a. Do you have procedures in place to ensure proper maintenance of the distribution system, including: - Appropriate pipe replacement and repair procedures ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Replacement and repair of other distribution system components ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Regular flushing program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Routine vault inspections ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Fully implemented cross connection control program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Maintain positive pressure in all parts of the distribution system l] Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2b. Following work done on the water system and following any pressure ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No loss event, do you collect investigative coliform samples? 2b.Has there been any recently reported low pressure (<24 PSI) or [I Yes ❑ No El Yes El No ss complete loss of reure in the distributions stem? 2c. Have there been any recent repairs or new construction in the ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No distributions stem? 2d. Are there any known pipe leaks that have not yet been repaired? ❑ Yes ❑ Na El Yes ❑ No 2e. Has there been any recent use of fire hydrants such as hydrant ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No maintenance or utili IFD flushing? 2f: If there are there any air -vacuum relief valve vaults in the distribution ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No system, are any flooded? 2g. Has there been any recent report of a cross connection incident? ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2h. Have there been any off -normal events, such as discolored water, odd ❑Yes ❑ No El Yes [I No taste, or smell? 2i. Have Eh ere been any other changes in distribution conditions or ❑Yes ❑ No Yes No El Yes operations that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: N M LIB IL m R a Part A: Assessment Corrective action needed? Corrective actions taken & date takers ( ) 2j. Inspect the distribution system: - Are there any visible line breaks or leaks? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Are there any observed unprotected cross connections? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Storage Facilities 3a. Does your water system have a water storage tank? If no, skip to ❑ Yes ❑ No Section 4. 3b. Do you have procedures in place for periodic inspection and cleaning of the interior of each storage facility including vent, roof hatch, and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [:]No overflow? 3c. Has there been any recent work done on a storage facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 3d.Are all storage facilities secured from unauthorized entry and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No vandalism? 3e. Have there been any other changes in storage conditions or operations ❑ Yes ❑ Nv ❑ Yes ❑ Na _ that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 3f. Inspect the storage facilities: - Does the tank have any cracks or other openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the reservoir roof free of any unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the access hatch constructed and sealed to keep contaminants out? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - If there is an airvent on the storage tank, is it constructed to prevent the entry of contaminants? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - is the overflow line constructed to prevent contaminants from entering the tank? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - if the overflow line discharges into a storm drain, to surface water, or directly into a sanitary sewer, is it protected by a proper air gap? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. Source --Groundwater ❑ Yes ❑ No 4a. Does your water system have awe]] ors rin . If no, ski to Section b. 4b. Do you comply with Sanitary Control Area requirements (WAC 246- ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 240-135(2)? 4c. Are all sources protected from fecal contamination by appropriate ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No placement and construction? ;: 4d. Have any unapproved sources recently been used? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 1p Ln W ' W Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water System Plan) V (veld we;sAS ia;eM dWOO L6OZ ata; uo 6ulJeaH allgnd : 6ZZZ) ueld WOlS (g aa;eM anlsuataaidwO3 L6OZ :tuewLioe;}d Part A: Assessment Corrective action needed'.' Corrective action(s) taken & date taken 4e. Have there been any recent tand use changes observed within a source ❑ Yes [—]No ❑ Yes ❑ No sanitary control area, such as construction, fanning, or dumping in the last month? 4f. Has there been any standing water, heavy precipitation, or flooding ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No around a source in the last month? 4g. Has there been any recent work done on a well or spring box? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 4h. Has there been any recent failure of a source pump? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 4i. Has there been any recent maintenance performed on a source pump or ❑Yes ❑ No [I Yes ❑ N❑ other source component? 4j. Are the source facilities secured from unauthorized entry and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No vandalism? 4k. Have there been any other changes in source conditions or operations ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 41. Inspect the source facilities: - Is the sanitary control area free of all potential sources of contamination? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - is the wellhead or spring box above grade with no potential for flooding? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the pressure tank water logged? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yeti ❑ No - Is the well cap seated and watertight, and the well casing free of unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - (For springs) Is the spring box (structure, hatch, and overflow) free of any unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ Nn - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Treatment --Groundwater 5a. is any source continuously treated with a disinfectant? if no, skip to ❑ Yes ❑ No Section 6. 5b. Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance ❑ yes ❑ No [:]Yes ❑ No of disinfection treatment facilities? 5c.If a disinfection residual should be continuously maintained throughout ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No the distribution system, was the measured free chlorine residual at the time of coliform sample collection below 0.2 m IL? 5d. Have there been any recent interruptions in any treatment process? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 5e. Has there been any recent maintenance performed on any treatment ❑ Yes ❑ No [:]Yes ❑ No component? v M Ln 6 IL m CU a Part A: Assessment Corrective 7 action needed . Corrective action(s) taken & date taken 5f. have there been any other changes in treatment equipment or process ❑ Yes ❑ No [—]Yes ❑ No that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 5g. InspecE the treatment facilities: - Is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. Source —Surface Water Supply (watershed) ❑ Yes ❑ No 6a. Does your water system have a surface water supply? If no, skip to Section S. 6b. Do you comply with Watershed Control Program requirements (W AC ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 246-290-135(4)? 6c. Has there been any recent spikes in raw water turbidity? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 6d. Have there been any land use changes within the watershed, such as ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No I ogg in , construction, or different farm in ractices in the past month? 6e. l lave there been any other changes within the watershed or in raw El Yes [I No El Yes [-I No water conditions that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 6f. Inspect the surface water intakelheadworks: - Is there evidence of problems at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there evidence of vandalism or other security breaches at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other. (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Treatment —Surface Water ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 7a. Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance of surface water treatment facilities? 7b. Have there been any recent interruptions in any part of the filtration or ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No disinfection treatmentprocess? 7c.Are filtration and disinfection treatment facilities properly operated and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No maintained? 7d.Has there been any maintenance performed on any treatment ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [—]No component in the past month? v rr) 7e. Have there been any problems with a treatment process in the past ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No M month, such as high finished water turbidity, disinfection inactivation ratio < I , or change s in coo ulation practices or itltration rater W c Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water System Plan) V al (veld walsAS ialeM dWOO L6OZ at,tl uo 6uiJeaH ollgnd : 6ZZZ) ueid WOlsAg aaleM aAlsuatiaidwO3 L6OZ :luewLioelld cc art A: Assessment Corrective action needed? Corrective action(s) taken & date taken a 7f. Have there been any other changes in treatment equipment or process Y that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑Yes ❑ No El Yes [I No a 7g. Inspect the treatment facilities: - Is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No S. Other assessment activities (describe): 6 Part B. Assessment Summary and Action Plan with Timetable for corrective actions not yet taken ❑ ASSESSOR: CHECK HERE if you did not identify any issues that may have directly or indirectly caused or contributed to entry of coliform bacteria into the system. Corrective Actions Completed: ASSESSOR: Summarize the issues found and the corrective actions that have been completed and date completed I Describe issue found I Describe corrective action taken and date completed Corrective Actions Not Completed: ASSESSOR: Describe the issues for which corrective actions have not yet been completed. Provide an action plan with timetable for completion. I Describe issue found I Describe planned corrective action and timetable for completion. Print Name of Assessor: OFFICE OF ❑RINKING WATER USE ONLY Regional Office Reviewer Assessment sufficient? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑rrective actions completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No -0 m mments: 0 X CD rt C4 Lai Signature of Assessor: Date of Review: Date: Likely cause determined? ❑ Yes ❑ No Sanitary defect(s) identified? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan included? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan approved? ❑ Yes ❑ No UW-4 Attachment: 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan (2229 : Public Hearing on the 2017 Comp Water System Plan) v iu 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX L Packet Pg. 538 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 539 7.1.a Edmonds Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE Sections: 7.10.010 Application for water use. 7.10.020 Accounts — Payments. 7.10.025 Delinquency charge. 7.10.030 Suspension of water use — Procedure. 7.10.040 Access to buildings. 7.10.050 Access to curb cocks and meter covers. 7.10.060 Limitation on water use. 7.10.061 Water restrictions — Powers of the city. 7.10.062 Water restrictions — Surcharge. 7.10.063 Enforcement. 7.10.065 Suspension of service — Failure to comply with sewer connection notice. 7.10.070 Turn on and turn off charges. 7.10.080 Request for inspection of meters. 7.10.110 Charge and bill adjustments. 7.10.120 Service connections. 7.10.130 Service pipe — Depth and size — Work left uncovered until inspected. 7.10.140 Dormant services — Connections. 7.10.150 Service pressure corrections. 7.10.160 Stop and waste valves. 7.10.170 Water shut-off — Temperature relief valve, pressure relief valve, and check valve required. 7.10.180 Unlawful acts. Page 1/18 7.10.010 Application for water use. All applications for the use of water shall be made at the development services department by the owner, or by the owner's authorized agent, on printed forms furnished by said department for that purpose, and shall contain the name and description of the lot, block and addition. The applicant shall state the purposes for which the water is to be used and shall agree to conform to the ordinances, rules, and regulations, with modification which may be adopted, as a condition for use of water. [Ord. 3629 § 2, 2007; Ord. 2214 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2139 § 3, 1980; Ord. 413 § 9, 1929]. 7.10.020 Accounts — Payments. A. All accounts shall be kept in the name of the owner, and all charges shall be made against the property as well as the owner thereof. No change of ownership or occupancy shall affect the application of this section. All bills are payable within 25 days from the billing date. If water bills are not paid within a stated period, the water will be shut off. Water will be turned on after payment of the fees as set forth in ECC 7.10.070, in addition to the amount of delinquent charges. B. At least 10 days before water is scheduled to be shut off, the administrative services director, or a designated city official, shall notify the owner and the occupant of the property. The owner shall be notified by mail at the address on the account, and the occupant shall be notified by mail, door hanger or other form at the property. Mailed notices shall be deemed received three business days after mailing. All notices shall contain the following: 1. Reason for water shut off, 2. Delinquent amount that needs to be paid to avert interruption in water service; 3. Instructions on scheduling a hearing to show that the account is not delinquent; and 4. The day on or after which water will be shut off. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 540 Edmonds Page 2/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE C. After notification, the owner and the occupant shall be afforded the opportunity to present to the administrative services director, or a designated official, evidence that the delinquent charges have been paid. Such opportunity shall be afforded before the water is shut off, provided, that the owner or the occupant make a request for the same to the administrative services director, or a designated official, within three days of presumptive receipt of the notice. The burden shall be on the owner and/or occupant to prove that the delinquent charges have been paid. c M D. After reviewing the evidence by the owner and/or occupant, the administrative services director, or the (L designated official to whom the evidence was presented, shall decide whether or not the account remains delinquent. E The owner and the occupant shall be notified of the decision, and this decision shall not be subject to further appeal. 4) If the account is found to be delinquent and water has not been shut off, water will be shut off as previously scheduled or three days after final decision, whichever date is later. If the account is not found to be delinquent and water has been shut off, water will be turned on without being subject to turn on and turn off charges in ECC d M 7.10.070. [Ord. 3629 § 3, 2007; Ord. 2214 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2139 § 4, 1980; Ord. 1942 § 1, 1977; Ord. 1385 § 1, 3: 1968; Ord. 1082 § 1, 1965; Ord. 821, 1960; Ord. 413 § 10, 1929]. E 7.10.025 Delinquency charge. 0 U A charge equal to $25.00 shall be added as a fee to each delinquent utility bill, except in cases of extraordinary hardship as determined by the finance director or his/her designee. The decision of the finance director can be N appealed to the Edmonds city council by filing an appeal with the city clerk no later than 14 days after the director's decision was mailed. The account shall be considered delinquent if full payment is not made within 35 days after the sending of the regular billing. Such delinquency notice and billing will be provided 35 days following the mailing of 0 a regular utility bill. This charge shall be applicable to all delinquent utility billing accounts. In order to be considered delinquent the outstanding principal balance of an account must total at least $40.00, and no delinquency charge shall be levied against any account balance under $40.00. This delinquency charge shall be paid prior to the = application of any payment against the fee or charge initially assessed and nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the city's collection of its attorneys' fees and other reasonable costs and charges in the event it is forced to seek judicial remedy for collection. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the city's ability to enforce a sewerage a lien on properties for delinquent and unpaid sewerage utility bills, as authorized by RCW 35.67.200 through 35.67.290, including terminating water service until charCD ges are paid and/or pursuing sewerage lien foreclosure. N [Ord. 4000 § 1, 2015; Ord. 3629 § 4, 2007]. N_ 7.10.030 Suspension of water use — Procedure. M Should a customer desire to discontinue the use of water for a period of time, notice thereof must be given in writing a to the utility billing department. The water will then be shut off and turned on again upon notice to the utility billing m department. The customer shall be required to pay charges as set forth in ECC 7.10.070. [Ord. 3629 § 5, 2007; Ord. 1942 § 2, 1977; Ord. 1448, 1969; Ord. 413 § 17, 1929]. co 7.10.040 Access to buildings. L Employees of the water division shall have access during business hours to all parts of buildings to which water may be delivered from the city mains for the purpose of ascertaining the number of rooms and families in the house or inspecting the conditions of the pipes and fixtures and the manner in which water is used. [Ord. 413 § 19, 1929]. y c 7.10.050 Access to curb cocks and meter covers. m 4) L The water division shall have free access to curb cocks and water meter covers. All persons are prohibited from 0. piling rubbish, building, or other materials thereon. [Ord. 413 § 20, 1929]. 0 V 7.10.060 Limitation on water use. In the event that a supplier notifies the city of a shortage of water or the director reasonably determines such a N shortage to be imminent, the community services director or his/her designee is authorized to implement the water shortage response plan in order to efficiently safeguard the safety and health of the general public or to provide for the public convenience. The use of water in the city, or in any portion thereof, for irrigation, cooling, sprinkling or t other uses may be forbidden, restricted, or regulated and such regulations may be made effective as to all customers or as to particular classes of customers. Rationing may be imposed during any shortage of water, either in lieu of or Q in addition to other measures hereby authorized. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 541 Edmonds Page 3/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE A. Upon receiving notification from a water supplier of an impending water emergency, the community services director will notify the mayor and city council within 24 hours or on the next business day that a water emergency will be or has been declared. B. The mayor or community services director will issue a public notification of the declaration of water emergency and imposition of restrictions. M C. Restrictions will be in effect immediately upon issuance of the public notification. Restrictions and the amount of a E surcharge for violations of mandatory restrictions will be posted and published within seven days of declaration at +3 least one time in a daily newspaper of general circulation. Notification will be delivered to television and radio stations to provide public information coverage. L d D. For emergencies when restrictions may extend beyond 21 days, public hearing before the city council will be scheduled by the community services director within seven days following the declaration of emergency. [Ord. 2774 a § 1, 1990]. E 0 c� 7.10.061 Water restrictions — Powers of the city. r� The community services director or his/her designee shall conduct public education efforts regarding the benefits N and necessity of conservation by the public, and is authorized to promulgate such rules and regulations as may be a) necessary to implement water use restriction. The regulations will be on file with the city clerk, and the regulations and any amendment thereto shall be effective 30 days after said filing with the city clerk. The community services c director or his/her designee is further authorized to make exceptions to such restrictions in specific cases as he/she tM finds reasonable which may in the director's discretion include, but are not limited to, watering newly seeded or sodded lawns, food sources, landscape ornamental plantings required by the architectural design board, when necessary to alleviate unnecessary economic hardship to commercial or industrial activities, or to prevent possible = damage to health, safety or welfare. [Ord. 2774 § 2, 1990]. 2 7.10.062 Water restrictions — Surcharge. a It is unlawful for any person to violate water use and restrictions and violation of these provisions shall be a w misdemeanor punishable under the general penalty provisions of this code. In addition to other lawful remedies, the N community services director or his/her designee is authorized to impose a surcharge for the first occurrence after a documented warning notice and each subsequent violation in which a customer's water usage practices exceed water conservation restrictions as provided for in this chapter. Said surcharge will be added to and become a part of the a water bill for the customer in addition to any service rate amounts as set forth in Chapter 7.10 ECC. Prior to the E imposition of the first surcharge, a public works division representative shall deliver in person or post a notice at the w service address advising of the customer's water usage practices in excess of mandatory water shortage restrictions >% co and advising that a surcharge may be imposed for any further violations. A copy of the violation notice shall also be mailed to the owner and/or occupant. The community services director shall promulgate regulations providing for appeal of any notice of violation. Appeals must be received within five working days of delivery of notice of violation. .y A. Surcharges for violations of water restrictions in effect for the balance of 1990 and until thereafter adjusted shall be: d L $25.00 for first violation; E 0 c.� $50.00 for each violation thereafter. r� B. Surcharges for all customer classes will be reviewed annually based on actual or projected expenses of the water 0 N r division necessary to maintain a water supply during an emergency. [Ord. 2774 § 3, 1990]. m E 7.10.063 Enforcement. A. The community services director, or his/her designee, including any employee of the city of Edmonds public r works division, or field personnel of the community services department, or police officer of the city, shall have the Q authority to enforce the provisions of this chapter. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 542 7.1.a Edmonds Page 4/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE B. In addition to the surcharges provided in ECC 7.10.062, the community services director or his/her designee is authorized to install a water restricting device on the waterline or lines serving any person who commits a second or subsequent violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. Alternatively, after such notice of a violation as may reasonably be given based on the circumstances, the community services director or his/her designee may cause water service to be terminated for subsequent or continuing violation of water conservation restrictions. [Ord. 2774 § 4, 1990; Ord. 2214 § 3, 1981; Ord. 1942 § 3, 1977; Ord. 547, 1943; Ord. 413 § 21A, 1929]. 7.10.065 Suspension of service — Failure to comply with sewer connection notice. A. There exists within the city of Edmonds certain earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas, and other environmentally sensitive areas in which the discharge of sanitary waste from private septic tanks constitutes a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare of the city. Such areas may be designated by the city council or by order of the public works director. The Meadowdale landslide hazard area, as defined and described in documents on file with the city of Edmonds and available for inspection at the request of any individual, is hereby declared to be such an area. Failure of any owner or owners of residential or commercial structures located within such a designated area to connect with available sanitary sewers following notice given in accordance with RCW 35.67.190 is hereby declared to be a public hazard and nuisance. B. When any owner or owners of property have failed to connect within the period established by written notification, the community services director or his designee shall cause a notification of shut-off of water service to be delivered to the owners of such properties by registered mail. The notice shall specify that water service shall be terminated by the city within 10 days of the date of notice unless: 1. The owner or owners shall cause the property to be connected to the public sewer within such period; or 2. The owner or owners shall apply for a building permit within said 10-day period and connect to the sewer line, present a written contract or adequate assurance between the owner and a licensed plumber evidencing an enforceable obligation and intent to connect to such line and provide a bond in an amount sufficient to fulfill the terms of such agreement in the event that the owner defaults thereon. C. In the event the owner fails to connect to the sewer line within the 10-day period or to provide the adequate assurances required by subsection (13)(2) of this section, water service to such residential or commercial structures and to the property on which they are located shall be discontinued. Service shall not again be instituted until such time as the owner has connected to the sewer system, paid the actual costs of the city including, but not limited to, disconnecting, reconnecting, notifying the owner and otherwise taking action with respect to the requirements of this section. The actual cost thereof may vary, but the city council hereby establishes such reconnection fee to be $250.00; provided, however, that in the event the actual costs are greater, they may be imposed by written order of the community services director or his designee and the reconnection shall not be completed until such time such assessed costs are paid. In the event that the owner or owners believe that the reconnection charges are in excess of the amount actually incurred or which reasonably may be incurred the city, the owner or owners may appeal the set fee or additionally designated fee to the hearing examiner in the same manner as if it were a Type II decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). [Ord. 3736 § 6, 2009; Ord. 2676 § 1, 1988]. 7.10.070 Turn on and turn off charges. The charge for turning off the water at the main shall be $20.00 and the charge for turning on the water at the main shall be $20.00 if done during regular working hours. If the water is turned on or off at any time other than during regular working hours, there shall be an additional charge of $125.00. [Ord. 4000 § 2, 2015; Ord. 3629 § 6, 2007; Ord. 2880 § 2, 1992; Ord. 2214 § 4, 1981; Ord. 2179 § 2, 1980; Ord. 2139 § 5, 1980; Ord. 1942 § 5, 1977]. 7.10.080 Request for inspection of meters. The water division, upon the request of any water user, shall inspect the water meter on the user's premises. A deposit of $20.00 shall be made with such request to cover the cost of such inspection. In the event such meter is found to be overregistering, such deposit shall be returned to the depositor; otherwise, said deposit shall be retained by the city. [Ord. 3629 § 7, 2007; Ord. 821, 1960; Ord. 413 § 22, 1929]. 7.10.110 Charge and bill adjustments. The administrative services director, or such authorized representative as he may designate, is authorized to make adjustments or corrections to billings for any charge for water service, including but not limited to connection The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 543 7.1.a Edmonds Page 5/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE charges, minimum monthly billings, meter charges, penalty and special charges, improperly charged rates, and, subject to the city council's approval, the cancellation of uncollectible bills and accounts. [Ord. 3629 § 8, 2007; Ord. 2179 § 2, 1980]. 7.10.120 Service connections. _ A. All tapping of mains, installation of corporation cock, service pipe leading from the mains to the property line, as M well as the turning on and off of the water shall be performed by the water division. All connections inside of the a premises shall be made by the owner and at his expense. E d B. In case of application for water service on premises not abutting upon a street upon which there is a city water main, the city will lay its connection from the main toward the premises for a distance equal to the distance from the main to the curbline, the distance in no case to exceed 40 feet, and permit connection therewith by means of a union, or may, at the discretion of the director of public works, upon advance payment of the estimated cost thereof, extend M the service to the premises of the applicant, but shall not cross or enter private property. [Ord. 413 § 12, 1929]. a E 7.10.130 Service pipe — Depth and size — Work left uncovered until inspected. V All pipes leading from the city's service connection shall be laid not less than 24 inches below the surface of the ground and no work shall be covered up until it has been inspected and accepted by the water division. No such N pipes smaller than three -fourths of an inch shall be used. [Ord. 413 § 13, 1929]. .r 7.10.140 Dormant services — Connections. 0 Any service connection which shall have been inactive, unused or abandoned for a period of 60 days or the house tM removed from the lot for at least one day shall be considered a dormant service and the meter shall be removed by the water division. If a service connection is subsequently desired for all or a portion of the premises or property previously supplied by a dormant service, the owner of the premises or property or his authorized agent shall make = application and pay a service charge in the amount shown in ECC 7.10.090. 2 7.10.150 Service pressure corrections. a A. Where the water pressure at the main is 80 PSI or greater, the customer may install an approved type strainer and N pressure regulator on his own premises in an accessible location. All costs of installation, operation, and N maintenance shall be borne by the customer. .. B. In services where the water pressure at the main is considered by the customer to be lower than the desired c a pressure, such customer may, after first requesting and receiving approval of the director of public works, install a E pump and pneumatic tank, or by other approved means provide increased pressure to the premises. The location of 4: such installation shall be on the customer's premises and he shall bear all costs of installation, operation, and maintenance thereof. co L m 7.10.160 Stop and waste valves. Customers shall, at their own expense, install and maintain all pipes, connections and fixtures from the meter placed > by the city. All pipes must be provided with stop and waste valves, protected from freezing and accessible at all y times to the customer. The valves shall be located in such manner that said pipes may be drained to prevent freezing and the water may be shut off to repair pipes, fixtures, and appliances, and also to safeguard premises from water damage in case the meter is accidentally turned on. Additional stop and waste valves shall also be placed at all low Q. points in the pipes when they cannot be otherwise drained. The city shall refuse to turn on the water until the E provisions of this section are complied with. The city shall not be responsible for freezing, accident or damage of t� any kind beyond the property line. [Ord. 2179 § 1, 1980; Ord. 413 § 14, 1929]. 7.10.170 Water shut-off — Temperature relief valve, pressure relief valve, and check valve required. 0 N 4.; A. The city may shut off water from the main at any time for the purpose of making repairs without giving advance notice to the property owner. The city shall not be responsible for any damage proximately caused by said shut-off E or failure to give notice of said shut-off. 0 2 r B. All persons having boilers on their premises for the purpose of heating with hot water or radiant heat are required Q to have installed, at their expense, a temperature relief valve, pressure relief valve, and a check valve. The owner of the premises shall be responsible to the city for any damages to city water meters caused by water from the owner's The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 544 Edmonds Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE Page 6/18 premises. The city shall not be responsible for the safety of boilers, hot water tanks, piping or other similar apparatus on the premises of any water customer. C. The provisions of subsection B shall apply to all boilers presently existing in the city and those installed in the future. All boilers not in compliance at the effective date of this section shall be brought into compliance within six months of the effective date of this section. [Ord. 2009 § 1, 1978; Ord. 413 § 15, 1929]. 7.10.180 Unlawful acts. It is unlawful for any person, corporation, or association to break, damage, or injure in any way any pipe, gate, meter or other water system appliance, or to interfere in any manner with the proper operation of any part of the water system of the city of Edmonds, or to make connection to or alterations in any pipe whereby water may be drawn from the city mains or to take water from any fire hydrant, bibb, pipe, or fixture of any kind, without first having secured a permit from the water division or proper city official. [Ord. 821, 1960; Ord. 413 § 16, 1929]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 545 7.1.a Edmonds Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Page 7/18 Sections: 7.20.010 Definitions. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — Procedures 7.20.070 Penalties. 7.20.010 Definitions. A. "Backflow" means a flow, other than the intended direction of flow, of any foreign liquids, gases, or substances into the distribution system of a public water supply. B. `Backflow prevention device" means a device approved by the state of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services or such other state department as has jurisdiction over the subject matter and by the American Water Works Association, used to counteract back pressure or prevent back siphonage into the distribution system of a public water supply. C. "Cross -connection" means any physical arrangement whereby a public water supply is connected, directly or indirectly, with any other water supply system, sewer, drain, conduit, pool, storage reservoir, plumbing fixture or other device which contains or may contain contaminated water, sewage or other wastes or liquids of unknown or unsafe quality, which may be capable of imparting contamination to a public water supply as a result of backflow. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. The installation or maintenance of a cross -connection, which, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designee, will endanger the water quality of the potable water supply of the city of Edmonds, is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. Backflow prevention devices, when required to be installed in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, shall be installed and maintained by the service customer on any service connection to the city of Edmonds water supply system where the backflow prevention devices are necessary for the protection of the city of Edmonds' water supply. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. Use or operation of a private water supply system, contrary to the provisions of the ordinances of the city of Edmonds, or the laws of the state of Washington or the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies where the private system is served by the city public water supply is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. The community services director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to develop rules and regulations based upon and including the requirements of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies and the protection of such supplies from contamination entitled "Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State," the provisions of WAC 246-290-490, and the American Waterworks Association, Pacific Northwest Second Edition of "Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual." The provisions of the Washington Administrative Code, the rules and regulations of the Department of Health set forth in the Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State and the previously referenced Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual are hereby adopted by this reference as fully as if herein set forth in full. Any additional rules and procedures necessary to implement such regulations shall be developed by the community services director or his/her designee as appropriate. Such rules and regulations shall be kept on file along with copies The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 546 Edmonds Page 8/18 Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION of the above referenced regulations and manuals in the office of the city engineer of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 2956 § 1, 1993; Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — Procedures. Cross -connections declared in this chapter to be unlawful whether presently existing or hereinafter installed and/or ca services requiring backflow prevention devices and/or unlawful use or operation of a private water supply system a served by the city public water supply are public nuisances and, in addition to any other provisions of this code or E the ordinances of the city of Edmonds on abatement of public nuisances, shall be subject to abatement in accordance N with the following procedure: A. In the event that the director of public works or his designee determines that a nuisance as herein provided does L exist, written notice shall be sent to the person in whose name the water service is established under the records of M the city of Edmonds water division, or alternatively, a copy of such written notice shall be posted on the premises a served. E 0 U B. The notice shall provide that the nuisance described herein shall be corrected within 30 days of the date the notice is mailed or posted on the premises. N C. In the event the nuisance is not abated within the prescribed time, water service to the premises shall be a) Z discontinued. r_ 0 D. In the event that the nuisance, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, tM i presents an immediate danger of contamination to the public water supply, service from the city water supply system m to the premises may be terminated without prior notice; provided, however, notice will be posted on the premises in = the manner heretofore provided at the time the service is terminated. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 2 7.20.070 Penalties. a In addition to the remedies set forth herein, any person found guilty of violating any of the provisions of this chapter CD shall be subject to the penalties as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. N N C M a E m N co L .y C d t N L E �0♦ V r 0 N r C a) E L 0 2 r a The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 547 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Sections: 7.30.010 Definitions. 7.30.020 Separate single-family residence meters. 7.30.030 Water rates — Meter installation charges. 7.30.035 Water and sewer utility general facilities charges. 7.30.036 Sewer special connection districts. 7.30.040 Utility charges — Sanitary sewer. 7.30.045 Special connection charge. 7.30.050 Unauthorized use of water. 7.30.060 Severability. 7.30.070 Water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions for low income citizens. 7.30.080 Reserved. 7.30.090 Penalties. Page 9/18 7.30.010 Definitions. A. "Dwelling unit" means a building or portion thereof providing complete housekeeping facilities for one family. B. "Single-family residence" means a detached building containing one dwelling unit only. C. "Duplex" means a building, occupying a lot, containing two dwelling units. D. "Apartment houses" and other "multiple units" (except hotels, tourist courts, trailer parks, and motels) means a building or buildings used for and containing three or more dwelling units occupied on a weekly or monthly basis. Units rented on a weekly or monthly basis shall not be deemed to be tourist courts or motels. E. "Hotels" means any place with individual rooms rented on a daily or weekly basis. F. "Tourist courts" and "motels" means detached multiple units, occupied and paid for on a daily basis. G. "Office buildings" includes all types of professional and business offices, including but not limited to architects, engineers, lawyers, doctors, dentists, real estate offices, etc. H. "Commercial" and "retail buildings" mean all types of retail and commercial business establishments other than office buildings and other than industrial or manufacturing, and each such business shall be considered as a separate unit even though two or more may be in the same building. I. In the event there is more than one type of operation in the same building, i.e., a professional office, a retail store, a restaurant, or an apartment, then in that case each separate category or type shall pay at the rate fixed under that particular category or type. J. "Equivalent residential unit" or "ERU" means a sewer connection charge based upon the winter standard water consumption of a single-family residence of 7.07 per 100 cubic feet of water. [Ord. 3339 § 1, 2000; Ord. 786 § 1, 1959]. 7.30.020 Separate single-family residence meters. Each single-family residence building or structure served by water shall be provided with its own separate water meter. Prior to the time when such additional separate meters can be installed, water rates shall be applicable on the same basis as if the separate meters were actually installed. [Ord. 1449, 1969]. 7.30.030 Water rates — Meter installation charges. A. Base Rate. The bimonthly rates of water supplied through meters shall be fixed at the following levels: The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 548 7.1.a Edmonds Page 10/18 Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Current 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 Single-family residence (per unit) $28.68 $31.26 $34.07 $37.14 Duplex, apartment houses, condos and other multiunit $25.26 $27.53 $30.01 $32.71 residences (per unit) All other customers: Current Meter 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 $34.68 3/4" $37.80 $41.20 $44.91 $70.60 1" $76.95 $83.88 $91.43 $130.55 11/2" $142.30 $155.11 $169.07 $199.04 2" $216.95 $236.48 $257.76 $429.38 3" $468.02 $510.15 $556.06 $608.22 4" $662.96 $722.63 $787.66 $1,233.55 6" $1,344.57 $1,465.58 $1,597.48 B. Variable Rate. In addition to the base rate set forth above, the customer shall be charged the following rate per 100 cubic feet of water consumed: Current 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 $2.99 $3.26 $3.55 $3.87 All water base rate and variable rate charges on water utility bills mailed on or after January 1 st of each year shall be based on rates as reflected in this section corresponding with said time period. C. Meter Installation Charges. 1. New service line and meter installation charges are fixed as follows: a.3/4" $550.00 b. 1" $800.00 2. The actual cost of street restoration (with regard to all surface streets) shall be added to any meter installation charge, if applicable. 3. When approved by the city engineer, new service lines installed by a developer on a plat shall be credited as follows: a.3/4" $175.00 b. 1" $200.00 D. All rates set forth in this section shall be exclusive of any applicable taxes. E. Repealed by Ord. 3618. [Ord. 4052 § 1, 2016; Ord. 3945 § 1, 2013; Ord. 3903 § 1, 2012; Ord. 3802 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3618 § 2, 2006; Ord. 3616 §§ 1 - 3, 2006; Ord. 3400 § 1, 2002; Ord. 3339 § 2, 2000; Ord. 2974 §§ 1 and 2, 1994; Ord. 2898 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2880 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2657 § 1, 1988; Ord. 2361 § 1, 1983; Ord. 2339 § 2, 1982; Ord. 2305 § 2, 1982; Ord. 2255 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2211 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2197 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2139, 1980; Ord. 1963 § The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 549 7.1.a Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Page 11/18 1, 1977; Ord. 1898 § 1, 1977; Ord. 1709 § 1, 1974; Ord. 1457 § 1, 1970; Ord. 1385 § 2, 1968; Ord. 1263 § 1, 1967; Ord. 901, 1961; Ord. 786 § 2, 1959]. 7.30.035 Water and sewer utility general facilities charges. A general facilities charge (GFC) (formerly known as a "connection charge") shall be paid by each new customer connecting to the city's water or sewer system in accordance with the following requirements: A. Sewer System GFC. The sanitary sewer GFC shall be paid by the applicant at the time and according to the date of side sewer permit issuance in an amount per equivalent residential unit (ERU) added as a result of the development as set forth in the table below; provided, that nonresidential building permit and business license applicants shall pay sewer system GFC when the proposed structure and/or business activity would generate additional probable sewer usage. 2012 effective date 2012 before effective date forward 2013 2014 and beyond Sewer GFC per ERU $730.00 $2,573.50 $3,495.25 $4,417.00 1. A single-family residential applicant shall pay a GFC equal to one ERU per dwelling unit. 2. A multifamily residential applicant shall pay a GFC equal to 0.67 ERU per dwelling unit. 3. Applicants for nonresidential development shall pay a GFC equal to the ERU determination that is made by the public works director. This determination shall be made by estimating the probable sewer usage of the proposed development. In estimating the probable sewer usage, the public works director may consider, among other factors, the average winter water consumption for similar existing development in the city. If the applicant disagrees with the director's ERU determination, the applicant may submit additional information and analysis from a qualified engineer, with an additional $200.00 review fee, in support of a request for an alternate ERU determination. The director shall review the request for an alternate ERU determination and may accept the alternate calculation, revise the earlier ERU determination based on the new information, or uphold the earlier ERU determination. Once the director has made a final ERU determination, the applicant may pay the GFC under protest and appeal the determination, along with the underlying permit, to the hearing examiner. B. Water System GFC. The water system GFC shall be paid upon, and according to the date of, application for water service, and based upon the size of the meter to be installed, as set forth in the table below: 2012 effective date Water Meter Size 2012 before effective date forward 2013 2014 and beyond 3/4" meter $908.00 $2,979.00 $4,014.50 $5,050.00 1" meter $2,270.00 $7,447.00 $10,035.50 $12,624.00 1.5" meter $4,540.00 $14,894.00 $20,071.00 $25,248.00 2" meter $7,264.00 $23,830.50 $32,113.75 $40,397.00 3" meter $14,528.00 $47,661.00 $64,227.50 $80,794.00 4" meter $22,700.00 $74,470.00 $100,355.00 $126,240.00 6" meter $45,400.00 $148,940.00 $200,710.00 $252,480.00 8" meter $72,640.00 $238,304.00 $321,136.00 $403,968.00 C. No water connection charge shall be levied for connections to water mains installed pursuant to Local Improvement District Nos. 115, 146 and 152 by properties which participated in the establishment of said local improvement districts. [Ord. 3883 § 1 (Att. A), 2012; Ord. 3339 § 3, 2000]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 550 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Page 12/18 7.30.036 Sewer special connection districts. A. A connection charge shall be paid by each new customer connecting to the city's sewer system within the following described district(s). This special connection charge is based upon the actual cost of constructing improvements which relate directly and exclusively to homes within the district(s) and which are, because of the special nature of the construction, separate and distinct from the overall costs of the system paid by a customer pursuant to ECC 7.30.035. These charges shall be in addition to the charges paid by a new customer pursuant to ECC 7.30.035 and do not duplicate any costs contained in the underlying sewer utility connection charge. B. 88th Avenue West Sewer Special Connection District. 1. Properties addressed as 21903, 21904, and 21911 88th Avenue West shown on Exhibit A attached to the ordinance codified in this section maintained on file in the city clerk's office and any subdivision, lot line adjustment or reconfiguration of the lots or the property represented by such addresses shall pay a special connection fee, to be paid in full at the time of connection to the sewer system, of $2,941.39 per lot. 2. Due to the significant additional sewer system construction that will be required at the property owners' expense to connect these properties to the sewer system after completion of the sewer project by the city, these properties may defer connection and shall not be required to connect to the sewer system within the time limit requirements of ECDC 18.10.010 and ECC 7.30.040. 3. The owner of any of these properties that does not connect to the sewer system within the time limits in accordance with ECDC 18.10.010 shall, upon connection to the sewer system, pay the above established special connection fee, increased based upon the Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for construction for the Seattle -Bellevue -Everett area from the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section to the time of connection to the sewer system. C. Olympic View Drive Sewer Special Connection Districts. 1. Properties legally described, addressed and identified on the attached Exhibit A (maintained on file in the city clerk's office) as 7101, 7109, 7115, 7327, and 7333 Olympic View Drive, and 7530 184th Place SW/Olympic View Drive, or any subdivision, lot line adjustment, reconfiguration, or modification (including but not limited to legal description, address and other identification) of the lots or the property represented by those addresses shall pay, in addition to other connection charges and/or permit fees required by ordinance and/or resolution, a special connection fee, to be paid in full at the time of initial connection to the sewer laterals constructed in Olympic View Drive as identified on sheets 72-78 of the city of Lynnwood's construction drawings for the Olympic View Drive Phase 2 — 76th Ave W to 178th Place SW, as follows: Special Address Connection Fee 7101 Olympic View Drive $4,015.85 7109 Olympic View Drive $3,720.56 7115 Olympic View Drive $3,569.45 7327 Olympic View Drive $3,009.26 7333 Olympic View Drive $2,939.29 7530 184th Place SW $3,798.31 Upon declaration by the city that the aforementioned sewer laterals constructed in Olympic View Drive are operational, the properties in Exhibit A shall connect to the sewer system in accordance with the requirements of ECDC 18.10.010 and ECC 7.30.040; provided, that a four -month extension to connect shall be granted to any of said properties that is developed upon payment, before the expiration of the time limit to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010, of one-third of the respective special connection fee charged above. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 551 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Page 13/18 Any of said properties that is undeveloped at the time the sewer laterals are declared operational shall be allowed to defer connection to the public sewer system until the time when the property is developed. The owner of a property with deferred connection shall pay, upon initial connection to sewer laterals in Olympic View Drive, the special connection fee as set forth above, increased by a cumulative multiple, to the extent permitted under RCW 35.92.025, equal to the Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for construction for the Seattle -Bellevue -Everett area from the expiration of the time limits to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010, which would then have applied had the property not been undeveloped, to the time of initial connection. 2. Properties legally described, addressed and identified on the attached Exhibit B (maintained on file in the city clerk's office) as 17632, 17708, 17626, 17806, 17810, 17910, and certain unaddressed property located between 17810 and 17910 Olympic View Drive and any subdivision, lot line adjustment, reconfiguration, or modification (including but not limited to legal description, address and other identification) of the lots or the property represented by such addresses shall pay, in addition to other connection charges and/or permit fees required by ordinance and/or resolution, a special connection fee, to be paid in full at the time of initial connection to the public sewer manhole and stub pipe located at the northwest corner of 180th St. SW and Olympic View Drive as identified on sheet 60 of the city of Lynnwood's construction drawings for the Olympic View Drive Phase 1 — 178th Place SW to 168th St. SW (public sewer manhole), of $4,932.85 per lot. Due to the significant additional sewer system construction that will be required at the property owners' expense to connect to the above referenced public sewer manhole and stub pipe, the properties in Exhibit B, regardless of whether they are developed or not, may, notwithstanding the requirements of ECDC 18.10.010 and ECC 7.30.040, defer connection to the same. The owner of a property that defers connection shall pay, upon initial connection to the public sewer manhole and stub pipe, the above established special connection fee, increased by a cumulative multiple, to the extent permitted under RCW 35.92.025, equal to the Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for construction for the Seattle -Bellevue -Everett area from the expiration of the time limits to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010 to the time of connection; provided, that if the property with deferred connection was undeveloped when the public sewer manhole and stub pipe were declared operational by the city, its owner shall pay, upon initial connection to the same, the above established special connection fee, increased to the extent permitted under RCW 35.92.025 by the aforementioned index from the expiration of the time limits to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010, which would then have applied had the property not been undeveloped, to the time of connection. [Ord. 3777 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3657 § 1, 2007]. 7.30.040 Utility charges — Sanitary sewer. The utility charges for sanitary sewer service set forth in this section shall be added to and made a part of the bimonthly or monthly rates for water supplied through the meters as set forth in ECC 7.30.030: A. The following rates shall be charged on all billings after the effective date shown with respect to the following customers and/or service: Current 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 Single-family residence (bimonthly per unit) Connected $66.49 $72.81 $79.72 $87.30 Unconnected $10.74 $11.76 $12.88 $14.10 Duplex, apartment houses, condos, and other multiunit residences (bimonthly per unit) Connected $53.42 $58.49 $64.05 $70.14 Unconnected $10.74 $11.76 $12.88 $14.10 Duplex, apartment houses, condos, and other multiunit residences (monthly) Connected $26.71 $29.25 $32.03 $35.07 The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 552 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Current 1/1/2017 Unconnected $5.37 $5.88 All other customers (monthly) Fixed rate Volume charge (per ccf)* *per 100 cubic feet (1 unit) of metered water consumption Page 14/18 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 $6.44 $7.05 $3.78 $4.14 $4.53 $4.96 $4.28 $4.69 $5.13 $5.62 B. For customers who are not served by city waterlines but who are connected to city sewers, the charges shall be the same as set forth in subsection A of this section and its subparagraphs. C. These rates do not apply to industries or manufacturing concerns which have industrial wastes. These, together with other activities not covered in this chapter, shall be dealt with on a special basis and have special rates set for the particular business by the water/utility administrative staff, subject to review and approval by the city council. D. All property owners within an area served by a sanitary sewer system in the city of Edmonds are hereby directed and compelled to connect their private drains and sewers to the city system. Failure to do so within 30 days of written notice to connect by the city shall subject the property owner to a monthly penalty equal to that charge imposed by subsections A, B, and/or C above. Said penalty shall be billed to the property owner, and they shall be subject to payment, collection and enforcement in all respects as though they were utility customers of the city. All penalties collected shall be considered revenues of the sewer utility system. [Ord. 4052 § 2, 2016; Ord. 3945 § 2, 2013; Ord. 3570 § 2, 2005; Ord. 3400 § 2, 2002; Ord. 3339 § 4, 2000; Ord. 3195 § 1, 1998; Ord. 2823, 1991; Ord. 2657 § 2, 1988; Ord. 2551, 1986; Ord. 2361 § 2, 1983; Ord. 2255 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2197 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2181 § 1, 1980; Ord. 2147, 1980; Ord. 2139, 1980; Ord. 1898 § 2, 1977; Ord. 1465, 1970; Ord. 1458 § 1, 1970; Ord. 1264 § 1, 1967; Ord. 1051, 1964; Ord. 786 § 3, 1959]. 7.30.045 Special connection charge. In addition to any other charges prescribed by this chapter, a special connection charge shall be paid by the owner of any property, residential dwelling unit, or other structure that may hereafter connect to the sanitary sewer improvements constructed by any local improvement district formed by the city and for which no assessment was imposed or charged under the said LID. The special connection charge for each property, residential dwelling unit, or other structure so connected shall be equal to the amount of the assessment that would have been levied against such property, residential dwelling unit, or structure under the final assessment roll of the appropriate LID if the said property, residential dwelling unit, or other structure had been so assessed, together with interest thereon at the rate established by the ordinance authorizing issuance of the bonds for said LID, from the time of such authorization until the time of connection. The special connection charge shall be paid in a lump sum prior to connection to the sanitary sewer. The special connection charge provided for in this section shall apply only where the debt used to finance the local improvements has not yet been fully retired through assessment payments. If such debt has been fully retired through payment of such assessments, the special connection charge shall not apply. [Ord. 3332 § 1, 2000]. 7.30.050 Unauthorized use of water. It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or other organization of any type whatsoever to take, or allow to be taken, water from the Edmonds water system without a valid per- mit issued by the Edmonds water division. Any person, including the officers and/or directors of any firm, corporation or other organization of any type, who shall take water from the Edmonds water system without such permit shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the penalties set forth in ECC 5.50.020. In addition to such penalties there shall be a charge by the water division for the taking of such water at a minimum of $100.00 plus $1.00 per 100 cubic feet of water taken. Said water charge may be charged against the premises from which the water was taken and enforced by available liens or, where applicable, against the individual, firm, corporation or other organization of any type, including the officers and directors thereof, who took or caused to be taken said unauthorized water. References herein to water permits shall include all permits required for water usage within the city of Edmonds, or from the Edmonds water system, as required by the Edmonds City Code. [Ord. 1562, 1971]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 553 Edmonds Page 15/18 Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES 7.30.060 Severability. Should any section, clause or provision of this chapter be declared by the courts to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the chapter as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid. [Ord. 786 § 6, 1959]. 7.30.070 Water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions for low income citizens. A. Definitions. For the purposes of implementing water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions under the provisions of this section, the following words or phrases shall have the following definitions: 1. "Low income citizen" shall mean a person who has established Edmonds as their residence and whose total disposable income including that of his or her spouse or cotenant does not exceed the amount specified in RCW 84.36.381(5)(b) as the same exists or is hereafter amended. 2. The definition of terms such as "residence," "total disposable income," "combined disposable income," and other such terms used in this section shall be given those meanings established by RCW 84.36.383 as the same exists or is hereafter amended. In the event that any provision of the Revised Code of Washington incorporated by reference or implication in this definitional section shall be amended, such amendment shall be deemed to be incorporated within or utilized in interpretation of this section. B. Low income citizens shall be given reductions in the water, sewer and stormwater rates as those rates are established from time to time by the city council: 1. A rate reduction of 30 percent shall be afforded those low income citizens who meet the qualifying income and asset levels established by RCW 84.36.381(5)(b)(i) as the same exists or shall hereafter be amended. 2. A 50 percent rate reduction shall be afforded those low income citizens qualifying under the provisions of RCW 84.36.381 (5)(b)(ii). 3. No rate reduction shall be afforded to any person shown as a dependent on the income tax return of any other individual, whether or not such person resides at the location for which the rate reduction is sought, unless the total combined disposable income of the applicant, along with their spouse, cotenant and all family members shown on the income tax return in which the applicant is shown as a dependent, meets the standards established by this section. C. The administrative services director is authorized to establish an application for low income citizens rate reduction applications. The application shall be provided without cost by the utility billing division of the city and shall include such information as may reasonably be required by the administrative services director to verify eligibility. [Ord. 3629 § 9, 2007; Ord. 2807 § 1, 1990; Ord. 2805 § 2, 1990; Ord. 2777 § 1, 1990]. 7.30.080 Reserved. [Ord. 2777 § 2, 1990; Ord. 2773 § 1, 1990; Ord. 2440, 1984; Ord. 2198 § 2, 1981]. 7.30.090 Penalties. A. Any person knowingly making any false or misleading statement in any application and/or renewal for rate reduction to any city employee with intent to secure the rate reduction authorized herein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. B. Further, in the event of any such misrepresentation, the water rate may be increased retroactively and assessed against the applicant and/or premises as may be allowable by law including but not limited to lien procedures. [Ord. 2198 § 3, 1981]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 554 Edmonds Chapter 7.40 FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE Chapter 7.40 FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE Sections: 7.40.010 Application — Information. 7.40.020 Ownership and costs. 7.40.030 Fire service to be metered — Second service to premises. 7.40.040 Fire service monthly service charges. 7.40.050 Violation — Penalty. Page 16/18 7.40.010 Application — Information. Water shall be supplied for fire protection purposes only after application has been made by the customer or his agent and approved by the water division and fire department. Sufficient information shall be supplied at the time of making application for service to enable the water division to fully determine the nature and extent of the proposed system. Detailed drawings of the proposed system shall be provided, which shall contain adequate information showing the locations and sizes of the system's piping and appurtenances. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.020 Ownership and costs. All fire service connections shall be installed by and remain the property of the water division. The expense for all labor, materials and equipment rental, including street restoration required for tapping mains, making connections, placing valves, meters, or any other protective device deemed necessary by the water division to prevent the unauthorized use of water, including the testing of completed work, meter pits and/or vaults, shall be paid for by the customer. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.030 Fire service to be metered — Second service to premises. Fire service connections shall be supplied only through an approved fire service meter or a detector check meter. In the case of premises for which both fire protection and other water service for such uses as domestic, commercial, industrial, or manufacturing purposes is supplied, there may be two service installations made to the premises: one for fire service only and one for other water service. These service functions may also be combined in a single service connection with the approval of the water division. In the event two separate service connections are installed, the fire protection system so served shall consist of an automatic sprinkler system only, without additional outlets which could normally be used for other than fire suppression purposes. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.040 Fire service monthly service charges. A. The monthly rates for inspection and maintenance of detector check systems are fixed as follows: Fire Service or Detector Meter Size Up to 4" 6" 8" Bimonthly Service Charge $12.34 $21.59 $30.81 Water used through the fire service line for fire suppression purposes and limited testing of the system will normally be furnished without any charge in addition to the bimonthly minimum charge set forth for fire service meter or detector check meter. B. If a detector check meter proves, or proof is otherwise provided, leakage or unauthorized usage of water which is not for fire suppression purposes, the customer shall pay for all water used at the applicable metered rate. The rates for water so used are fixed as follows: at the time of first written notice from the city water division the applicable rate shall be the same as the domestic rate for comparable size of domestic water meter for unauthorized use over 100 cubic feet per month; in the event the unauthorized use again occurs after the period of time specified in the The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 555 Edmonds Chapter 7.40 FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE Page 17/18 written notice from the water division, the rate shall be double the domestic rate for a comparable size domestic water for such unauthorized use over 100 cubic feet per month. C. References made by this chapter as to existing metered rates shall be to Chapter 7.30 ECC. [Ord. 3629 § 10, 2007; Ord. 3457 § 1, 2003; Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.050 Violation — Penalty. In addition to all civil rights of collection, liens, shut -offs and other remedies available to the city of Edmonds as prescribed by statute and ordinance for unauthorized use and/or nonpayment of charges, any person, firm, corporation or other organization, including any officers, directors and managers thereof, who violate any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 556 Edmonds Chapter 7.60 COMBINED UTILITY Chapter 7.60 COMBINED UTILITY Sections: 7.60.010 Combination of combined water and sewer utility and stormwater management utility. 7.60.020 Separate rates — Accountability. 7.60.030 Utility assistance fund. Page 18/18 7.60.010 Combination of combined water and sewer utility and stormwater management utility. The city is maintaining and operating a combined water supply and distribution system and sanitary sewage disposal system and, by Chapter 7.50 ECC, has created a stormwater management utility. Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35.67.331, the present combined water and sewer utility, and the stormwater management utility, together with all additions, extensions and betterments thereof at any time made, are hereby combined into a single utility; provided, that the accounting procedure for each system shall be kept separate as required by RCW 35.37.010. The combined water, sewer and stormwater management utility of the city, together with all additions, extensions and betterments thereof at any time made, shall hereinafter be called the "combined utility." 7.60.020 Separate rates — Accountability. The council declares its intent to establish rates for the combined water and sewer utility and stormwater management utility. In order to better account for the costs of the respective components of the combined utility, the administrative services director is directed to maintain such separate funds and accounting structures as may be necessary to discretely account for the costs, expenses and revenues of each component utility. When the staff makes recommendations for the establishment, increase or decrease in any rate, it is directed to provide supporting data which separately reflects such costs, expenses and revenues for each component utility. 7.60.030 Utility assistance fund. A. Purpose. The city council establishes the utility assistance fund in order to accept, hold and dispense funds contributed either from the city's general fund, from charitable and civic organizations or from individual rate -payers who have made donations for the assistance of a category of citizens known under Article 8, Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution as the "poor and infirm" and under other provisions of other state statutes and local ordinance as the low-income, elderly and disabled. B. Disbursement. Such monies as are contributed shall be held and disbursed to persons qualifying for the assistance programs established by ECC 7.30.070 and the provisions of state law incorporated in that section. Disbursements may be made, to the extent of monies held within the fund, for utility charges, connection fees, and other exactments levied by the utilities which, taken as whole, constitute the combined utility. The monies may be expended for purposes which generally benefit the public health, safety and welfare or are designated by the donor of the fund. C. The administrative services director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to adopt forms and procedures for the acceptance of contributions to the fund and for the disbursement of monies from the fund. [Ord. 3393 § 1, 2002]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 557 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a APPENDIX M Packet Pg. 558 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a. E as r L r cQ C 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L cu w N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ a d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 559 7.1.a Agency Review Comments To be provided prior to final Plan adoption. Packet Pg. 560 7.1.a THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK a E a� L d L E O V r Cl N N t r.+ CD N N N C m a E m N Co L m .y C d t N L E �O♦ V r 0 N r C d E L V r a Packet Pg. 561 7.1.a c a E d r L r Q E 0 U n r O N N t CD N N N C d E N (n U) L Cu N C d t L Q E 0 U ti r 0 N r+ C d E t V 2 a+ a Packet Pg. 562 7.1.a murraysmilh www.murraysmith.us TACOMA / EVERETT / SEATTLE / VANCOUVER / SPOKANE / PORTLAND / EUGENE / BOISE Packet Pg. 563 WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE Presentation to City Council Public Hearing July ss, 2017 murraysm�7h 00, I'7C. 109" r- O a N N N 7.1.b f•••••• Project Background 0 Plan Elements = a N �••••••• Water Use Efficiency N N r 06 r ti ....... Water System Evaluation C ........ � System Improvements 0 U U :....... Financial Plan d 0 E ........ Next Steps and Schedule W E Packet Pg. 565 -U. 10, Project Background ■ Last plan update completed in 2010 ■ New regulations allow update every 10 years ■ 20-year planning horizon ■ Guidance document for budgeting and scheduling CIP projects 7.1.b murraysmilh, Packet Pg. 566 -A;. 10, Plan Elements Chapters Executive Summary 1 - Introduction 2 - Water System Description 3 - Land Use and Population 4 - Water Demands 5 - Policies and Design Criteria 6 - Water Source and Quality 7 - Operations and Maintenance 8 - Water System Analyses 9 - Water System Improvements 10 - Financial Plan Appendices A - Agreements B - Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) Form C - Water System Facility Data D - Consistency Statement Checklist E - SEPA Checklist F -Water Use Efficiency Program G - Water System Construction Standards H - Cross Connection Control Program - Fire Code J - Annual Water Quality Report K - Coliform Monitoring Plan L - Water Ordinances M - Agency Review Comments 7.1.b murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 567 -v. 10, Water Use Efficiency ■ Water usage gradually decreasing since 2003 ■ Per capita demand 104 gal/day in 2010 WSP ■ Per capita demand 95 gal/day in current WSP ■ Met goal of 1% reduction in annual per capita water usage ■ Distribution leakage remains below 10% 7.1.b murraysmilh, Packet Pg. 568 -U. 10, Water System Evaluation Water supply capacity is sufficient Alderwood Supply Station @ Olympic View Drive 7.1.b murraysmilh, Packet Pg. 569 -U. 10, Water System Evaluation Water storage capacity is sufficient Five Corners Reservoirs @ Bowdoin Way 7.1.b murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 570 -U. 10, Water System Evaluation Pump station capacity is sufficient Five Corners Pump Station @ Bowdoin Way 7.1.b murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 571 -U. 10, Water System Evaluation Old water mains are reaching end of service life Some are undersized for fire flow 2011 Watermain Replacement @ Dayton Street a murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 572 -U. 10, Completed System Improvements ■ Replaced 12 miles of older undersized water main ■ Replaced 11 pressure reducing stations ■ Five Corners Pump Station control upgrade ■ Alderwood Supply Station improvements ■ Seavi ew Reservoir and Yost Reservoir improvements 7.1.b murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 573 -U. 10, Planned System Improvements ■ Mostly replacement of older undersized water mains — 90% of 20-year CIP ■ Pressure reducing station replacements ■ Five Corners Reservoirs seismic improvements and recoati ng ■ Emergency intertie improvements ■ Other miscellaneous improvements 7.1.b murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 574 Financial Plan -A;. 10, CIP is $3.1M per year average for next 10 years Funding from cash reserves without new debt Rates recently adopted for 2017-2019 Future years based on projected rate adjustments 7.1.b murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 575 Current Water Rates -U. 10, Shoreline $ 90.10 Lake Forest Park $ 90.10 Woodinville WD $ 75.17 Seattle $ 74.75 Kirkland $ 66.24 Edmonds $ 56.46 Arlington $ 52.73 Everett $ 42.59 Redmond $ 42.83 Olympic View W&S District $ 39.82 Mountlake Terrace $ 38.40 Alderwood Water & Wastewater $ 37.96 Mukilteo W & S District Westside $ 39.02 Lynnwood $ 37.48 Average = $56.01 r- 0 d 2 a N N ti 06 r ti �L 0 U U d 0 E W 0 Q murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 576 oV E.DAf fhc t A�� Schedule and Next Steps Planning Board 15t meeting —June 28, 2017 Council Public Works Committee —July 11, 2017 Planning Board Public Hearing —July 12, 2017 Council meeting &Public Hearing —July 18, 2017 Submit plan to DOH and adjacent water purveyors --' J u ly 19, 2017 Council adoption --' December 2017 murraysmr7h, Packet Pg. 577 • 1 7.1.b 'Sjkllv�ml am c �L d V a an N N N 00 ti al C N 2 V 3 a 0 c 0 U V a Co c 0 E w c m E u Packet Pg. 578 c 0 a� c �L 2 V Figures & Supporting Information c . n Packet Pg. 579 FIGURE 2.1 CvrnprenensNe Water System Plan Existing Water System ,fuse 2017 Lownd Fm rgency Imwee ExFliI." Water 0A..— x wevvwe rEeaucing veran - 8251pn. V!m(r Main hmp Stehon ti2� ImeYlelx Main rkSm0• 4Rh 2—Wa1n Mam 9r F.upMy Siaiien a , 2m. tamer Mem V Ar�saure npi� ..kly 600 Z.. tamer Man a Zone vbve [Gnawl 'AS Iona YrSle•Mah _ ci of E.—Reiaeiveter 59a2ane Yerter Max t 5ervx.rne prcyeura 7_anee= �I 014, W.W Bvirw Arws J25 S.nr Ciry limns ezfl Z— t Srwro�niihlNinq Cpumy 9aundery .352me ase 2— MO Ione St15 rcn. lard • •w pPo e�anobr moenm Saa 2rn !! Se:i•re a _ PaY KS [s]52m.] I jjj-1.IT In - f rn'rns rK. nr. I `I- � im pnncr im.rc,e. rY OFpvro PUgef, Sound f 1 ram JS - Lr.rawoov Nit!• . .i1U I TM - rpeney iavnM rt . L .. ll. Y ..0 555 iarw t . .... _.._ter--_ ___�_t.:rw'..��....w. �1../ .....� • pe ei�0lfnnpll +4 waxr�..�t Oli ... i - � E��rq9�!nn M ref E r ••- i eaelSN - f s cauxlr � ff •'•••.•• ... 9.nn r ' ryya j ■ ,,�•• Snrtlr Pohlk lNilYw�,_�■�■] . ya+aar.+....+�..• 'H....- a'�: M�ieii.—i.....r. •-.H'►.�N .. .. e .. r Erue�IC NOR-H CITY WATER u'ILriiL.'. DISIRM Packet Pg. 580 650 ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT SUPPLY (635 ZONE) •�ti 600 595 ZONE } CCCC^^ PRV #2 PRV � A ll! , NORTH SOUTH PRV #24 PRV #10 j?RV #14 JPRV #I & 13 PRV pe PRV #9 y aw 500 ZONE ry 450 428 ZONE Pr<v 1 Ffflv {e 400 PRV #7 .!till! s 926 ZONE 1 CITY OF LYNNWOOD (5T3ZONEy PRV #IIJ VPRV #17 1 1 3y 4W ZONE ff471'�7MCM OE.489' PRV I23 -PRV #IB 5 MG RESERVOIR ��}}� 'W ��}y 'W ETER: W' 3.0 MG RESERVOIR cn�'r49 DIAMETER' 104' 42OZONE a°54D GAL/FTS FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIRS & PUMP STATION pE=325' 1.5 MG SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 1.5 MO OE-325' YOSTRESERVOIR� �+ DIM 119'x119• DIM_ 119"119' .7d , PRESSURE RF11EF STATION Ito BOTTOM EL: PRESSURE RELIEF STATION 4119 9224 u 0,924 GAL/Fr I05 AL/FT 3 LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS 5M ZONE - PRESSURE REDUCING EL ELEVATION 505 ZONE STATION/VALVE FT FEET a y 50D ZONE 466 ZONE N ISOLATION VALVE MG MILLION GALLONS OE OVERFLOW ELEVATION 425 ZONE A CONTROL VALVE 420 ZONE Fy 325 ZONE 1A PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE ...... ADJACENT SYSTEM O IkTERTIE i PUMP STATION E i O FACILITIES 0.T SAME SITE PRV I f c O 5EATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES � STANDBY SUPPLY •L (592 ZONE) f ............. V :a OLYMPIC V3EW WATER DISTRICT � LOW ZONE (540 FT) N N � �OLYMPIC tiEw WATER DISTRICT N (505 ZONE) n 486 ZONE r ti •L N OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (415 ZONE) , .2 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT WOOOWAY ZONE (S53 Fr) °P en,G FIGURE 2-2 i ! i Comprehensive Water System Plan U Existing Water System Hydraulic Profile ! L S mmray` June 2017 r i Packet Pg. 581 FIGURE 2-3 Comprehenalve Water System Plan Service Area and Adjacent Water Systems asoFalmliGV June 2077 Legend 0yof Edmonds Rawu WPror UM,l Mn+ mnx o�nci CPowkv— wela•63sner Oiaonn SRear• Kow u.'". nnm ay w.. n,l� • • Srronm> IMr'D Counry evWwry Auget Sound L Of uo�FRwovn •� OF$ikiti { fff r I A 1 4 li y �J I ti r—.--_—_-- � r ■ I— � -.r - i t 1 a- rr, I OF LYHHH`DOO 1 i 1 I 1 1 f F � 1 � I I i)te I r ! 5` ■ -If I e, ■ — — — — — — — — —---------'—'--- + ' 4 _ _ � r 11 1�7 UNINCORPORATED ----- CRY OF r SNONONi$N ! ISM MAaE TOM Or N'OOOVGY OLVIAPIL VIEW COUNTF j ! TEM E 1YA pISiRa.R ICT !r f i' � !f ■ . . I � •,. M,wr SKAumTii +v aewatlw�oPe�. PUBuC A HOTE OISTT R DISR WACi 7.1.b a Packet Pg. 582 FIGURE 3-1 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Map FT1.b771 Aul I Packet Pg. 583 1 FIGURE 9-1 rY an >sLnE c WATC�^ •" 0 N x,opp Wn55EWCrER Compretrenalve Water Syslem Plan 2010 - 2017 WaSar Main Improvements F" G � � I +IIEvlvud@ June 2o1Y y - �nareY�Mincl` er i k�R — 41 B A]]]n.wgayawpmy Vwr w'• f L � �� a McBaia wuw t'aew llw e - L-1 �- • k mr y cnvor Puget "% 'vr conoNoe, 4,1 Sound r 1 41 Mlh OlymWc N�� rf- '•k YhFer01- " W°0°'9Y s51sa z zees . }� I_ _ '' � �1 � .• . .. ti Emery ency IntMi.a t � gm.y inr.ni.. � + � MIh Pv WW��Nrn �rOlymPiirvvrow Vlaler Ol.Wct rr 5052orve G1 I - 1 i ? .rs zew. r• i _ I �F i !W Law 2oiw I F �i, �5 1 I - y YNlNCORPOYi-01F0 fERAwCEEr t I � LOIIHIF � . x i jTOWN OF 1: iFRaySipwE¢n57R IE i vmeelwr i! r f j 8wd6 8u from 1. 1 -1 .•'� 9.atlH el elllla �- 1fi-�aawa• f 8!lCIICNIf9HCQumT �= 22aM1 V .orra[wiu�e.wa u.µry,�rv.a 9ISiFIC1 Lfkl11E6 v[»rI V ' 7.1.b C O C �L V 7 a as N N N Packet Pg. 584 FIGURE 9.2 Comprehensive Waler System Plan Propossd capital Improvemams XXVraf'A'!N(b June 2017 Leoend Q FnrprinCY unswe keaucrq' m e^v Stxan � Pow ■ SweY Sbie+ ❑ rsoNy tt fir. ypnlLbeeer a Eemwat Feral weix `—+ Se•rw ANn — t ryytwW Sr�ew..s ■e■ nyLmns PrE,tsun 2enn: 995 hw +ss zw. 505 ]v. GBB 2mr p civwrr.r:m MIN ■ m Impreremmtc Pugh[ SDifr7d ] ]t t '• M.rl at yfYwMOF w wlpi OlYsnPllctNlMe . wmsao��r T4ER arsE4VER➢. 0 1 N ; r W.TEa 6 weEr- v z.000 _ w olnisicT s 1� F!yA rre.wr..X. u�p �r{th Glry o} �� _ k?�nwead'fl]2ern fIr E- ! Al. . Rlpr�r rr px _J TL T3rsmin rl:• f _ 3 [k k wtm `5vii ione�..mn ] PRY all noon m I } 99 I Eir cn ° i imtn,r:e IE 5rr3 r one ` ri-__._ E WlfXLOR�DAaiEn •�• NDUXT�arcE dNCHOdrlSX ERnACE � •. ouNi!' ri. l � � p � 1 r , 1 ••.... a�i_..-}d.,.wQ�w.da•..' �'��sxDXu+r,sNcov�vrr avrin'nEg uc r woniXeirr N°r0 ^' uramEs I wnieR msrsic* c 0 2 V a N N N \r Packet Pg. 585 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Presentation of the City of Edmonds' Water Use Efficiency Program for 2017 (10 min.) Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Public Works & Utilities Preparer: Royce Napolitino Background/History The City of Edmonds has been an active participant in the Everett Water Utilities Water Conservation Program since the late 1990's. In addition, other programs specific to Edmonds include : leak detection surveys; annual waterline replacement program; bills showing water consumption history; school -based education; and public outreach. Staff Recommendation Adopt the 2017 Water Use Efficiency Program and forward to the State of Washington for approval. Narrative The City of Edmonds Water Use Efficiency Program topics includes the following: Current Water Conservation Program - an update of the current program including program changes; Water Use Efficiency Goal Establishment - Efficiency & Conservation programs in which Edmonds participates; and the Water Supply Summary - Our Water Source and Annual Water Consumption. Attachments: 2017 Water Use Efficiency Program 6-29 Packet Pg. 586 7.2.a City of Edmonds Water Use Efficiency Program January 2017 Packet Pg. 587 7.2.a Current Water Conservation Program The City of Edmonds has been an active participant in the Everett Water Utilities Water Conservation Program since the late 1990's. In addition, other programs specific to Edmonds have been ongoing as well, including leak detection surveys, an annual water main replacement program, and bills showing water consumption history. A summary of these programs is as follows: Leak Detection Surveys - The city has leak detection equipment and has an ongoing leak detection program. Once leaks are identified, they are repaired as soon as possible. Water Main Replacement Program - Each year the City replaces approximately 1.5 miles of the distribution system. Bills Showing Consumption History - Customer bills that provide historical water consumption data allow customers to understand how their use varies throughout the year. This information helps L customers make informed choices about how they manage their water use, including implementing conservation. The City's customer bills depict consumption data for the preceding year, in 2-month increments, shown on a simple bar graph (see example below). M N _ N Meter 9 Prev Read 1 Prey Read 2 Prev Read 3 Curr Date Curr Read 1 Curr Read 2 Curr Read 3 TOTAL v 2015 1,129 0 0 512$2017 1,143 0 0 14 to Water Usage 14 14 m a 10 ---9------- — - 9 7- - — o a 5- - -- --5.. o ¢ 4 o Do.--0-9 Q 4 O u_ Each Unit= 1 00cf= 74B gallons PROPERTY OWNER RE5PQN5JEll l The property owner is legally responsible for all charges onthisbi 1. ALLCOAAl NED UTILITY BILLS REMAIN AGNNSTTHE PROPERTY EVEN IF THERE IS A CHANGE 1 N OWNERSHIP PAYMEh TERMS This bill is considered delinquent if not paid in fun by the Due Date. To make A payment. you may use our payment drop box IVBaIBp at Chy Hall, 121 tith AvOnue, pay in parson at City Hap, mall your payment, do a one-time payment or enroll for automate payments online at EdrnaxisUtilityPaymenta.com. Checks or Wney Crders should be made payable to the City of Edmonds. RETURNED ITEMS: If paymart is relumed unpaid by your bank, nupoymenl will be required in the form of cash_ money order, ®sh ler a check, or debdVm%dit card along with a $30.00 returned item fee - If Ihapay men[ was rrrade after the Due Da to rD avoid turn off, service will his discoh netted immediately and addi bona) charges wig be applied to the acrpunt. DELINQUENCY: Once i account becomes delinquent, it will be suujact to a S25.OD penalty. ❑efirioui accounts may have tha water disconnected andror Ilen filed against the property CITY OF EDMONDS • 121 5TH AVE N • EDMONDS, WA SZO20.425-T71-0241 Pay your bill or enroll for autairnatic payments online at EdmondsJ1iI1t Payments.ii School -Based Education - As part of the regional Everett Water Utility Committee (EWUC), the City participates in school -based education programs, including classroom presentations, teacher workshops, and classroom educational materials. The classroom presentations are facilitated by trained instructors with curriculum designed for elementary, middle school, and high school students. The presentations are marketed to teachers through newsletters and other communications. The teacher workshops assist teachers who educate students about water resource issues, including conservation. Teachers participate in activities, experiments, and go on field trips. Teachers can receive continuing education credits or clock hours. Lib,Docs,MyDocs, WordData,WatUseEffProg,6-29 Packet Pg. 588 7.2.a The classroom educational materials include a broad collection of items such as books, videos, posters and other supplies. Public Outreach - As part of the regional EWUC program, the City engages in general public outreach intended to build and reinforce a water conservation ethic among customers. These efforts include distribution of brochures, a summer watering calendar, transit advertising, and other regional efforts. The City distributes several educational brochures developed by Everett and its wholesale partners. For example, the "Everyday Conservation" brochure provides conservation tips for inside and outside the home, the "Smart Watering" brochure contains information on efficient lawn and garden watering techniques, and the "Growing Healthy Soil" brochure has information on how soil can be improved as a means of reducing water use. The City also has a summer watering calendar available each year for customers that encourages them to water every third day (staggered, based on their street address). This effort helps to reduce the daily peak demand for water in the summer by decreasing the amount of watering that occurs on a given day. Transit advertising is employed to convey conservation messaging. Billboards promoting various conservation themes have been posted on buses during the summer months when demand peaks. It is M estimated that these billboards are seen by over 75 percent of the residents in the service area of N Everett and its wholesale partners each year. The City, through EWUC, plays an active role in regional organizations that promote water conservation. EWUC has been an active member of the Partnership for Water Conservation and its predecessor, the Water Conservation Coalition of Puget Sound, for over a decade. Indoor Retrofit Kits - As part of the regional EWUC program, the City has offered free indoor water conservation kits to residential customers since 2001. The kits target homes constructed before 1993 and are designed to encourage customers to upgrade their fixtures to current efficiency standards. In 1993, the National Plumbing Code of 1991 was adopted in Washington State and increased efficiency standards for household water fixtures. The kits are marketed through announcements in local newspapers, the city's newsletter, and through other local online news sources. The kits include a low -flow showerhead and two faucet aerators. The kits are estimated to save 34 gallons of water per day. These estimates are conservative and do not attribute any savings to leak reduction or behavioral changes, both of which are likely to occur. Approximately 1260 kits have been distributed to City of Edmonds residents beginning 2007-2015. Outdoor Irrigation Items - As part of the EWUC program, the City has offered free outdoor water conservation items to residential customers since 2001. The items target households with irrigated landscape areas, primarily single family homes that do not have automatic irrigation systems. The items are designed to encourage customers to reduce watering and other outdoor water use. Studies indicate most households overwater their landscape area by 15 to 20 percent. The items are marketed through announcements in local newspapers, the city newsletter, and through other local online sources. 2 Lib, Docs,MyDocs, W ord Data, W atUseEffProg,6-29 Packet Pg. 589 7.2.a The items include an automatic shut-off watering timer for use with lawn sprinkler or drip hose, an adjustable spray hose nozzle, and a soil moisture meter. These items are estimated to save an average of 40 gallons of water per day Approximately 1900 outdoor items have been distributed to City of Edmonds residents beginning 2007-2015. Water Use Efficiency Goal Establishment During the previous 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan Update, city staff gave a public presentation on the plan, including information on the water conservation program in effect at the time. At the August 3d, 2010 Edmonds City Council Meeting, staff advised the council, and the general public, of the requirement to obtain public comment on water use efficiency measures which would benefit the City of Edmonds. The goal of the 2014 - 2019 Everett's regional water conservation program, which the City of Edmonds participates, is to reduce the regional demand for water by about 2 million gallons per day by the end of 2019. M On April 6t", 2010 City staff discussed with the council alternative water utility rate structures. The City N currently uses a uniform utility rate structure. The discussion included inclining block and seasonal rate a, charges. The conclusion was to continue with the uniform utility rate structure since the conservation � goal is being met. E M Estimated Annual Savings - The estimated conservation savings the City will have while participating in the regional conservation program will be a 2 percent reduction in water demand. Distribution System Leakage - Based on 2016 water consumption records, the overall non -revenue water amount equates to 10.88 percent, with a 3-year average of 9.1 percent average of the total water supplied by the Alderwood Water District and Seattle Public Utility (SPU) master meters. The City will continue to monitor its records to provide documentation that the overall system leakage remains below 10 percent. Planned Water Use Efficiency Measures for 2014-2019 - The City will continue to participate with the Everett Water Utility Regional Conservation Program. This program, as demonstrated by the City of Everett, is shown to be very cost effective. The cost is included in the wholesale water pricing to Edmonds and equates to one percent of the average water bill. A summary of the planned water use efficiency measures is as follows: Leak detection surveys - The City will continue to survey the water system for leaks. Water main replacement program - The City will continue this program at a cost of approximately $2 million annually. 3 Lib, Docs,MyDocs, W ord Data, W atUseEffProg,6-29 Packet Pg. 590 7.2.a Bills showing water consumption history — The City will continue to provide this information and offer ways for customers to obtain additional information via the city website. School -based education — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to participate in school -based education programs including classroom presentation, teacher workshops, and classroom educational materials. Public Outreach — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to participate in public outreach programs including water conservation brochures, summer lawn watering calendar, transit advertising, and other regional efforts. Indoor retrofit kits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to offer indoor retrofit kits. This measure applies to the single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new a�i .2 customers. Different versions of the kit will be available to each sector. The single-family kits consist of a r_ 2.0 gallons per minute (GPM) showerhead and a 1.0 GPM bathroom faucet aerators. Those flow rates w a, are more efficient than the maximum allowed under the plumbing code. The multi -family kits include L those measures plus 2.2 GPM kitchen faucet aerators, which are treated as bringing customers up to code, even though technically the maximum flow rate allowed under the plumbing code is slightly higher at 2.5 GPM. Kitchen faucet aerators are only included in the multi -family kits since the measure analysis concluded that the majority of the single-family sector has already been brought up to code due N v to natural replacement and distribution of the previous kits, which were targeted primarily to single- N family customers. W Outdoor irrigation kits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to offer outdoor irrigation kits. This measure applies to the single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers. These are free outdoor irrigation kits with devices and information to improve the irrigation efficiency of residential customers that manually irrigate their landscaping. Historically, the kits have included items such as a water timer and shut-off device, a spring -loaded hose nozzle, a rain gauge, hose washers, and a conservation brochure. Toilet leak detection — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will expand one component of the previous EWUC indoor kits. This measure provides free toilet leak detection dye strips for customers to determine if their toilets leak and provides detailed information on how to fix leaks. This measure applies to single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers, and businesses with tank -style toilets. Only tank -style toilets are targeted since most leaks occur in that type of toilet, usually via flapper leaks. Commercial indoor and outdoor audits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will begin offering indoor and outdoor audits to large commercial customers to determine efficiencies that could be achieved through hardware improvements, operational changes, or irrigation efficiency improvements. The audits are performed by a professional auditor. Conservation rate structures — Currently Edmond customers are billed based on a relatively small fixed charge, along with a uniform rate for actual consumption. As part of the next comprehensive plan 4 Lib, Docs,MyDocs, W ord Data, W atUseEffProg,6-29 Packet Pg. 591 7.2.a update in 2016, the City will review conservation rate structure, including inclining block and seasonal rates. Reclaimed water opportunities — The next comprehensive plan update will also investigate the feasibility and opportunities to use reclaimed water. The City has discussed using reclaimed water and has determined at this time the cost of new infrastructure, additional wastewater treatment plant improvements and additional effluent treatment would not be cost effective. Water Supply Summary — The City of Edmonds water supply originates in the Cascade Mountains at Spada Lake, a man-made reservoir formed from damming the Sultan River in the 1960's. The reservoir receives rainfall and snowmelt which then is piped downstream to Chaplain Reservoir and further delivered via four large transmission lines to the City of Everett. From there some water is then delivered to large storage reservoirs, such as those operated by the Alderwood Water District. The District then conveys water to different service areas, among those the City of Edmonds. Spada Reservoir has a storage capacity of 50 billion gallons and is located in steep mountain terrain that receives an average of 165 inches of precipitation a year. This map represents the flow of the Everett water supply from Spada Reservoir to Everett proper via transmission lines. Water is then conveyed down the 1-5 and State Highway 99 corridor with one final destination being the City of Edmonds shown along Puget Sound in the southwest corner. ■ 9 r,� C41APL�IN �� SrKiKwish WNW AESEIb4t 99 rm _ M"L. SF.z Lilac 2 C J Nonrve LAW ■ Gold Bar Lkrrµ N ■ hco� Er:rar�, 7 i W F e 4� 5 Lib,Docs,MyDocs, WordData,WatUseEffProg,6-29 Packet Pg. 592 7.2.a 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 City of Edmonds Annual Water Consumption f SEATTLE CCF ALDERWOOD CCF COMBINED CCF ♦ TREND LINE 0 4>0 00 00 C�, 00 CP op, 0 00 0A 00 CP Oo 1�1 & Oo O� o`' O`O O� Oo O°' No ^^ Nll ^o Nt, Nb ^o � 0 E Lib, Docs,MyDocs, W ord Data, W atUseEffProg,6-29 Packet Pg. 593 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Second Quarter 2017 Budget Amendment (15 min.) Staff Lead: Scott James Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History These amendments were presented at the Finance Committee meeting of July 11, 2017. It was recommended that these amendments be discussed and approved by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends ppproval of Ordinance No. XXXX amending the 2017 Budget. Narrative There are a total of 14 budget amendments. Nine of the budget amendments are new items for Council to consider. Four of the budget amendments have offsetting revenue and do not effect the ending fund balance. One of the amendments moves budget appropriation from non -departmental to the Parks and Recreation budget for a retirement payment and does not effect ending fund balance. Four of the budget amendments reduce ending fund balance. The General Fund balance is reduced by two of the amendments for a total of $2,030, which include $1,030 for annual software maintenance for the Government Access Channel Programming and an additional $1,000 for the Diversity Commission Coordinator. Five of the amendments have been before Council previously. Three of the amendments are new budget appropriations. They include the temporary administrative assistant for the engineering department, the bandshell, and the Veterans Plaza. Two are corrections to the budget appropriation for the Lodging Tax Fund and the bond debt service allocation. Attachments: 2017 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance Packet Pg. 594 8.1.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4063 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers and increases in appropriations; and WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is transferred from one fund to another; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2017 Budget; and THEREFORE, WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4063 adopting the final budget for the fiscal year 2017 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, and F adopted herein by reference. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take I Packet Pg. 595 8.1.a effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVE EARLING 2 Packet Pg. 596 8.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2017, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON9 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4063 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2017. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 3 Packet Pg. 597 EXHIBIT "A": Budget Amendment Summary (July 2017) 8.1.a FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION 2017 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES 2017 ENDING FUND BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 7,499,335 37,821,980 40,156,085 5,165,230 009 LEOFF-MEDI CAL INS. RESERVE 518,570 278,630 293,460 503,740 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 968,260 6,800 100,000 875,060 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 5,414,470 44,650 - 5,459,120 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 2,230 5,030 5,400 1,860 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 349,530 452,000 545,500 256,030 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 152,450 130,000 76,030 206,420 111 STREET FUND 602,950 1,851,750 2,002,810 451,890 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/I MP ROVE 54,750 6,397,932 6,427,332 25,350 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 484,370 137,200 181,880 439,690 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 18,030 110 - 18,140 120 HOTEL/MOTELTAXREVENUE FUND 87,180 91,200 104,100 74,280 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 62,410 24,600 26,880 60,130 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSH I P FUND 15,720 1,800 2,000 15,520 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 102,270 30,450 61,700 71,020 125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 2,347,736 1,311,900 3,065,566 594,070 126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 1,689,821 1,314,400 2,411,421 592,800 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 257,180 50,390 51,220 256,350 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 38,670 280 - 38,950 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 145,680 177,820 217,020 106,480 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 2,179,880 2,616,940 2,955,000 1,841,820 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 153,310 1,070 - 154,380 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUSTFD 905,630 22,880 - 928,510 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 3,440 10,010 10,500 2,950 211 LID FUND CONTROL 2,050 14,400 16,450 - 231 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVICE FUND - 695,830 695,830 - 421 WATER 16,130,068 8,469,570 13,173,652 11,425,986 422 STORM 7,955,605 4,789,173 8,236,907 4,507,871 423 SEWER/TREATMENT PLANT 39,756,336 12,179,879 16,916,688 35,019,527 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 842,940 1,988,720 1,989,720 841,940 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 7,492,610 1,628,910 1,886,000 7,235,520 512 Technology Rental Fund - 946,040 890,430 55,610 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 209,490 66,000 72,070 203,420 Totals 96,442,971 83,558,344 102,571,651 77,429,664 a+ Q Packet Pg. 598 EXHIBIT "B": Budget Amendments by Revenue (July 2017) 8.1.a FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION ORD. NO. 4054 12/6/2016 ORD. NO. 4063 3/31/2017 ORD. NO. 7/2017 2017 Amended Budget 001 General Fund $ 37,753,480 $ $ 68,500 $ 37,821,980 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 278,630 - 278,630 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund 6,800 6,800 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 44,650 44,650 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,030 5,030 016 Building Maintenance 452,000 452,000 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 130,000 - 130,000 111 Street Fund 1,784,200 67,550 1,851,750 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 5,933,570 464,362 - 6,397,932 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 137,200 - 137,200 118 Memorial Street Tree 110 110 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 91,200 91,200 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 24,600 24,600 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,800 1,800 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 30,450 30,450 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 1,311,900 1,311,900 126 Special Capital Fund 1,314,400 1,314,400 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 50,390 50,390 129 Special Projects Fund 280 280 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 177,820 177,820 132 Parks Construction 2,616,940 2,616,940 136 Parks Trust Fund 1,070 1,070 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd 22,880 22,880 138 Sister City Commission 10,010 10,010 211 Lid Fund Control 14,400 14,400 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service fund 695,830 695,830 421 Water 8,469,570 8,469,570 422 Storm 4,770,970 18,203 4,789,173 423 Sewer/Treatment Plant 11,663,700 516,179 12,179,879 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,988,700 - 20 1,988,720 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,628,910 - 1,628,910 512 Technology Rental Fund 946,040 946,040 617 Firemen's Pension Fund 66,000 - - 66,000 Totals $82,423,530 $ 998,744 $ 136,070 $ 83,558,344 a+ Q Packet Pg. 599 EXHIBIT "C": Budget Amendments by Expenditure (July 2017) 8.1.a FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION ORD. NO. 4054 12/6/2016 ORD. NO. 4063 3/31/2017 ORD. NO. 0 7/2017 2017 Amended Budget 001 General Fund $ 39,793,700 $ 275,355 $ 87,030 $ 40,156,085 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 293,460 - - 293,460 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - 100,000 100,000 012 Contingency Reserve Fund - - - 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,400 5,400 016 Building Maintenance 482,000 63,SOO 545,500 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 76,030 - - 76,030 111 Street Fund 1,922,760 12,500 67,550 2,002,810 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 5,962,970 464,362 - 6,427,332 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 181,880 - - 181,880 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 89,700 9,900 4,500 104,100 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,880 - - 26,880 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 2,000 - 2,000 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 34,700 27,000 - 61,700 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 2,476,000 486,566 103,000 3,065,566 126 Special Capital Fund 2,180,310 214,711 16,400 2,411,421 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 51,220 - - 51,220 130 Cemetery Maintena nce/Improv 217,020 - 217,020 132 Parks Construction 2,935,000 20,000 2,955,000 138 Sister City Commission 10,500 - 10,500 211 Lid Fund Control 16,450 16,450 231 2012LTGO Debt Service Fund 695,830 - 695,830 421 Water 12,745,260 512,192 (83,800) 13,173,652 422 Storm 7,495,330 856,217 (114,640) 8,236,907 423 Sewer/Treatment Plant 14,995,780 1,719,048 201,860 16,916,688 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,989,720 20 (20) 1,989,720 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,873,000 13,000 - 1,886,000 512 Technology Rental Fund 890,430 - 890,430 617 Firemen's Pension Fund 72,070 72,070 Totals $ 97,515,400 1 $ 4,774,371 1 $ 281,880 1 $ 102,571,651 a+ Q Packet Pg. 600 EXHIBIT "D": Budget Amendment Summary (July 2017) 8.1.a Fund Number Change in Beginning Fund Balance Revenue Expense Change in Ending Fund Balance 001 68,500 87,030 (18,530) 111 67,550 67,550 120 - 4,500 (4,500) 125 103,000 (103,000) 126 16,400 (16,400) 421 (83,800) 83,800 422 (114,640) 114,640 423 - 201,860 (201,860) 424 20 (20) 40 Total Change 136,070 281,880 (145,810) C N E C N E a N 7 m ti O N L L C O U w cn a+ Q Packet Pg. 601 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Annual Software Maintenance for the Government Access Channel Programming. (Rushworks Annual System Assurance Program (ASAP)) Department: City Clerk's Office Fund Name: GENERAL Division: Mayor's Office Title: City Clerk Preparers I Scott Passey Department Account Number: 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I On -Going Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Annual System Assurance Program 0 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $1,030 $1,030 $1,030 $1,030 $1,030 Total Fxpenses 1 $1,030 1 $1,030 1 $1,030 1 $1,030 1 $1,030 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 001.000.39.508 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Fndin Cash $1,030 $1,030 $1,030 $1,030 $1,030 M c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L L c� C'1 c 0 U a� CM N N Packet Pg. 602 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: The need for outside consultant plan review of building permits has exceeded the anticipated budget of $30,000 due to increases in permitting activity. This need is due to a combination of a) complex projects requiring additional expertise in structural review and b) inability of staff to keep up with the overall workload. The requested increase in funding will be more than offset by increased permit revenues. Department: Development Services Fund GINIItAL Division: Building Title: Professional Services Name: Preparer: Leif Bjorback Department Account Number: 62 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: N/A Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem Description [sI Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 From General Fund 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 30,000 61,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $30,000 $61,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $91,000 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 001.000.322.10.000.00 30,500 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 001.000.345.83.000.00 30,500 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $61,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 E7 Packet Pg. 603 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Additional $1,000 in 2017 Diversity Commission staff budget to cover delayed payment of $1,000 for 2016 services by Diversity Commission Coordinator due to late submittal of 2016 final invoice. Department: Community Services Fund Name: GENERAL Division: Title: Diversity Commission Coordinator delayed 2016 payment Preparer: Patrick Doherty Department Account Number: 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: I Strategic Objective 3 Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem Description [sj Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Professional Services 152,400 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $152,400 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $153,400 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 1,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Finding Cash $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L d c� Cl c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 604 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Authorization to spend up to $6,000 in potential vendor fee receipts for 2017 Holiday Market professional services (e.g., management fees, advertising). Department: Economic Development Fund Name: GENERAL Di -vision: Title: 2017 Holiday Market revenue/expenditures Preparer: Patrick Doherty Department Account Number: 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: 2a.2 Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem Description [s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Professional Services 81,000 6,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $81,000 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $87,000 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 001.000.347.93.000.00 6,000 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Finding Cash $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 11 c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L d c� Cl c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 605 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Authorization to spend up to $1,500 in potential sponsorship receipts for 2017 Puget Sound Bird Fest professional services (e.g., speaker fees). Department: Economic Development Fund Name: GENERAL Division: Title: 2017 Bird Fest revenue/expenditures Preparer: Patrick Doherty Department Account Number: 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: ld Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem Description [s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Professional Services 81,000 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $81,000 $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $82,500 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 001.000.367.00.200.00 1,500 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Finding Cash $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 12 c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L d 1= c� Cl c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 606 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Renee McRae retired as of 5/31/17 and the following payout was made on 6/1/17. This amendment is to transfer the budget authority for the payout amount from non -departmental to the recreation program. Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Fund Name: GENERAL Di -vision: Parks Title: Employee Retirement Payout Preparer: CCruz for Carrie Hite Department Account Number: Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem Description [s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Salary 001.000.64.571.22.11.00 0 44,965 0 0 0 0 Benefits 00 1. 000. 64.5 71.22.23. 00 0 3,510 0 0 0 0 Salaries 001.000.39.518.10.11.10 0 48,475) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Fhding Cash $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 13 c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L d c� U c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 607 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Redirect reimbursement check received from Safeco Insurance for the replacement of the City's traffic control cabinet and repair concrete @ OVD and Puget Drive that was dammaged in a vehicle accident on 2-3-2017. A contract has been signed with O.C.C.Pioneer to do the concrete repairs and replacement of the cabinet for a cost of $70,000. Department: Public Works Fund GINIItAL Division: Street Division Title: Insurance Recovery Name: Preparer: Tod Moles Department Account Number: 111.000.68.542.64.48.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem Description [sI Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 tra c control re air/maintenence 7,000 67,550 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $7,000 $67,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $74,550 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 111.000.395.20.000.00 67,550 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $67,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 14 Packet Pg. 608 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Preliminary Design of a replacement retaining wall within Right -Of -Way. Department: Public Works Fund Name: R , , L 1 Division: Fngineering Title: 89th PI W Retaining Wall Preparer: Robert C Edwards Department Account Number: VCD i025 126.000.68.595.70 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: N/A Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem Description [sI Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Professional Services 126.000.68.595.70.41.00 0 13,400 0 0 0 0 Inter and Services 126.000.68.595.70.41.67 0 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $16,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $16,400 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Fnding Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 126.000.39.508.30.00.00 16,400 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $16,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 15 c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L d c� Cl c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 609 8.1.a EXHIBIT "E": New Items for Council to Consider (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: As part of the City of Edmonds' Stormwater Permit compliance efforts, the City is working with the Snohomish Conservation District and ECOSS to implement two outreach programs. The Conservation District will conduct stormwater education classes for Kindergarten through 12th grade students in the Edmonds School District. ECOSS will provide illicit discharge prevention and spill response training to businesses in Edmonds, including supplying a spill kit for clean up of spills. Department: Public Works Fund STORM Division: Engineering Title: 2017 Stormwater Permit Outreach Name: Preparer: Michael Cawrse Department Account Number: VCD i025 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: N/A Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Professional Services 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0 3,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $3,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $3,400 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 3,400 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $3,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 16 Packet Pg. 610 8.1.a EXHIBIT "F": Previously Discussed by Council (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: This budget amendment will fund a temporary Administrative Assistant position t( provide coverage while an employee is on maternity leave. The estimated increa! to the Division's salary line item is $16,500 and includes the increased salary cost and projected salary savings. The actual amount may be less depending on the hourly rate of the temporary employee and duration of employment. Department: Public Works Fund Name: GENERAL Division: Engineering Title: Temporary Administrative Assistant Preparer: Rob Fnglish Department Account Number: Strategic Plan Task Action Item: I N/A Budget Amendment Type? I Previously Discussed By Council If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Temporary Position Approved by City Council on June 20, 2017. What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Salaries .001.000.67.518.21.11.00 1,472,770 16,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub Total $1,472,770 $16,500 $0 $0 $0 g Total Expenses 1 $1,489,270 1 $0 I $0 I $0 Ig Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 001.000.39.508 16,500 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $16,500 $0 $0 $0 1 17 c a� E c m E a a� a� m ti 0 N L d c� Cl c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 611 8.1.a EXHIBIT "F": Previously Discussed by Council (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Corrections to Lodging Tax Fund line items for Professional Services, Advertising and Nliscellaneous expenditures that were not fully accounted for in approved 2016 budget book. No new expenditures are included. The line item totals were reviewed and approved by the LTAC in budget meetings on June 27 and November 1, 2016, and presented by staff for review and approval in concept by City Council during budget process. Department: Community Services and Economic Development Fund GENERAL Division: Lodging Tax Fund Title: Name: Preparer: Cindi Cruz Department Account Number: 120.000.31.575.42.41.00120.000.31.575.42.41.40-120.000.31.575.42.49.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? I Previously Discussed By Council If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: During budget approval What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description [sI Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Increase in Professional services 41.00 41,900 5,900 0 0 0 0 Increase in Advertising 41.40 41,500 4,000 0 0 0 0 Decrease in Miscellaneous 49.00 12,200 (5,400) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $95,600 $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $100,100 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 120.000.31.508.30 4,500 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 Packet Pg. 612 8.1.a EXHIBIT "F": Previously Discussed by Council (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Frances Anderson Center Bandshell. This was approved by Council on February 7, 2017 out of REET 2 balance. This is the formal budget amendment to authorize the expenditures. Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Fund Name: REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 Division: Parks Title: Bandshell Preparer: CCruz for Carrie Hite Department Account Number: 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? I Previously Discussed By Council If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Feb? 2017 What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description [s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Projects 0 32,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $32,000 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 125.000.64.508.30 32,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Finding Cash $32,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 19 c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L d c� Cl c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 613 8.1.a EXHIBIT "F": Previously Discussed by Council (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: Veterans Plaza -An additional $71,000 spending authority was granted by the City Council on April 25, 2017 Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Fund Name: REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 Division: Parks Title: Veterans Plaza Preparer: CCruz for Carrie Hite Department Account Number: 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? I Previously Discussed By Council If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Apr 25 2017 What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description [s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Projects 0 71,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $71,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $71,000 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 125.000.64.508.30 71,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Finding Cash $71,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 20 c a� E c m E a m ti 0 N L d c� U c 0 U a� Cl) N N Packet Pg. 614 8.1.a EXHIBIT "F": Previously Discussed by Council (July 2017) Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter Item Description: There was a spreadsheet linking error in the budget preparation tab for the transfers from the Utility Operating Funds to the Bond Fund. The payments for principle and interest are correct but the allocation from the utility funds to the Bond Fund needs to be adjusted. This amendment was included as part of the 1st quarter amendment but the amounts were not included in the ordinance calculation. Department: Finance Fund UTII.ITY FUNDS Division: Finance Title: Bond Fund Allocation Name: Preparer: Debra Sharp Department Account Number: Bond Fund Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? Previously Discussed By Council If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 2017 1st Quarter Budget Amendment What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 421.000.74.597.34.55.24 725,820 (83,800) 0 0 0 i 422.000.72.597.31.55.24 397,500 (118,040) 0 0 0 423.000.75.597.35.55.24 865,380 201,860 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 i Sub -Total $1,988,700 $20 $0 $0 $0 $I Total Expenses $1,988,720 $0 $0 $0 $I Revenue and Fnding Cash Comments 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 421.000.74.508 83,800 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 422.000.72.508 118,040) 0 0 0 1 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 423.000.75.508 201,860 0 0 0 1 Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Uding Cash $20 $0 $0 $0 $1 21 Packet Pg. 615 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 General Commercial (CG) Development Regulations and Planned Action for the Highway 99 Subarea (40 min.) Staff Lead: Shane Hope, Director Department: Planning Division Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History Revitalizing the Highway 99 area has been a goal of the City Council and the public for years. Over time, various studies were developed and several transportation safety projects were planned. However, a clear vision and a broad -reaching strategy for the future had not been articulated. In early 2016, based on a budget allocation approved by the City Council, work began on a new Highway 99 Subarea Plan, planned action EIS, and implementing development regulations. Significant public information and input were provided. (More details of the public process have been noted in previous reports to the Council.) The first major product being considered by the City Council is the Draft Highway 99 Subarea Plan. (See Attachment 5.) The second major product being considered by Council has two component - the Proposed Zoning Map amendments and the Draft CG Code, including related Sign Code amendments. (See Attachments 2 and 3, respectively.) So far in 2017, the City Council has held five meetings, including two public hearings, on the plan and/or development regulations. The minutes from the last such meeting - the June 20 public hearing on the CG Rezone (Map) and Development Regulations - are provided here. (See Attachment 1.) Staff Recommendation 1) Consider the CG Development Regulations and Planned Action Code for the Highway 99 Subarea; 2) Provide any questions, comments, or direction on the draft documents. Narrative CG Development Regulations The draft CG development regulations (Attachment 3) are almost the same as reviewed at the Council's June 20 public hearing, except for a few technical corrections/ clarifications and the incorporation of the related sign code amendments as a last section of the development regulations, instead of in a separate document. In addition, two other changes are proposed; they are explained below. The following Question -and- Answer section address several key issues, mainly based on comments from the June 20 public hearing. Question: How are pedestrian areas treated in the draft CG regulations, compared to the existing CG Packet Pg. 616 8.2 regulations? Answer: In the proposed regulations, a pedestrian area is required. It must include a streetscape zone next to the curb of at least 5 feet, a clear pedestrian zone of at least 5-10 feet and a pedestrian activity area behind that, which may include walkways, benches, and other pedestrian amenities. However, under existing regulations, no specific requirements are provided for a pedestrian area. Question: How are amenity spaces treated in the draft CG regulations, compared to the existing CG regulations? Answer: The draft regulations require amenity space equaling at least five percent of the building footprint. (Note: The draft code language was adjusted since the Council's last review to clarify that amenity space may be shared by more than one property owner.) Amenity spaces must include pedestrian -oriented features, such as seating, paths, gazebos, and artwork. This compares to the existing CG regulations, which require no amenity space. Question: How are heights, setbacks, and stepbacks treated in the draft CG regulations compared to the existing CG regulations? Answer: Attachment 4 has two information tables. One table shows the dimensional requirements copied from the proposed regulations; the other table shows the dimensional requirements copied from the existing regulations. Comparing tables reveals that: The height limits would remain the same (except that CG and CG2 would be consolidated) The minimum street setback would be increased under the new regulations from 4 feet to 10 feet (except that vehicle sales use would be allowed a minimum street setback of 5 feet) The minimum side and rear setbacks would remain the same, meaning no minimum except 15 feet is required adjacent to single-family zones, same as now. In addition, the draft regulations require an additional 10-foot "stepback" for all CG buildings greater than 25 feet in height when the building is adjacent to a single-family zone. Any portion of a building above 55 feet in height, adjacent to a single-family zone, must be stepped back 20 feet from the required setback (which means at least 35 feet total-i.e., a 15-foot setback plus a 20-foot "stepback"- from the single-family zoned property). This is in contrast with the existing regulations, which require NO additional stepbacks from single-family zones for buildings greater than 25 feet in height. If the City Council wishes to adjust the stepbacks or setbacks further, here are some options: A. Require a five-foot stepback for buildings greater than 35 feet in height that are across the street from single-family zoned (RS) properties when the adjacent street right of way is less than 75 feet wide. (The proposed code applies to adjacent RS properties but "across the street" is not considered adjacent.) This would be added to the proposed minimum 10-foot street setback, in addition to the space that is created by the intervening street and sidewalk. B. Require a five-foot stepback for any portion of buildings above 55 feet in height that front a street less than 75 feet wide. However, the challenge to adding more setback/stepback requirements is to not add so many requirements that building is discouraged. That would negate the goal of having a revitalized Highway Packet Pg. 617 8.2 99 area. After all, many of the proposed new design requirements are already stricter than the existing code. Question: Can the vehicle parking standards be adjusted a bit to favor transit -oriented development? Answer: The draft parking standards discussed at the June 20 meeting require a minimum 0.75 parking spaces for each residential unit that is less than 700 square feet and otherwise, 1.75 parking spaces for each unit. Since then, an in-between option has been included in the draft regulations (Attachment 3, subsection B.1.a of 16.60.030): a new vehicle -parking requirement of 1.25 spaces for residential units between 700 and 1100 square feet. (Note: Additional guest parking must be provided for all development that has residential units.) Question: What further changes could be made to the "Exceptions" process for site design in special situations (such as properties within 300 feet of a highway interchange, where pedestrian access is especially limited) to provide more flexibility while still being able to achieve a more walkable environment? Answer: The Exceptions Process in proposed 16.60.030.C.3 (Attachment3) has been modified from the last draft to remove a previous requirement that would have precluded site design flexibility for any existing or new buildings. It also revised a criterion in the Exceptions Process to more striclty limit vehicle parking within the first 20 feet, rather than the first 65 feet. The change is consistent with the Planning Board's recommendation for some added flexibility. Question: Can a limitation be added for where or how much vehicle parking is allowed on the first floor? Answer: Yes. This has been previously brought up by Council and a reasonable limit would be useful. The limit could be added to a section of the proposed code. A couple options for the standard are: 1. Allow no vehicle parking within the first 20 feet of a building where the building faces a primary street, unless the parking is underground; or 2. Allow no more than 60% of the first floor of a building to include vehicle parking, where the building is less than 50 feet from the primary street. Question: How do the proposed regulations encourage or incentivize "green" and sustainable development? Answer: The proposed regulations: Require bicycle storage for most multifamily housing (this is not required anywhere else in Edmonds) Require electric vehicle charging infrastructure for all new development that includes housing (this is not required anywhere else in Edmonds and exceeds the standard of most other cities in our region) Establish a walkable and transit -friendly character in multiple ways (which recognizes that reducing vehicle usage will result in less carbon emissions and that people who walk more have a better chance of being healthy) Require amenity space that promotes sustainability-for example, having places for people to play and socialize, places for trees and vegetation (while specifically encouraging native plant species). Packet Pg. 618 8.2 In addition, new development will be encouraged to take advantage of solar programs and other renewable energy. One way that the City could incentivize solar is to allow a fee reduction in the permit fee schedule for projects that use solar. This approach could be considered as part of an update to the permit fee process. Alternatively, projects with solar components could be prioritized for plan review. (The downside of the latter is that other plans that were submitted first would be bumped back in the cue.) Planned Action Code The Growth Management Act and the State Environmental Policy Act provide for a "planned action" process that jurisdictions can use to streamline the environmental review process for projects that have already been covered by an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) developed for a subarea. This is, in part, because the EIS will have analyzed impacts of development and identified mitigation measures to address the impacts. To memorialize the EIS work for the subarea, cities may adopt a "planned action ordinance" or code that specifies the type and amount of development that may be allowed to proceed in the subarea without additional SEPA review. All other applicable laws and regulations would still apply. A draft planned action code (see Attachment 6) has been prepared for the Planning Board's review. Some elements of it will be finalized after the Final EIS has been issued. (A Draft EIS was issued in early June and the Final EIS is expected in early August.) The Planning Board will hold a public hearing on the draft planned action code on July 26. It is included here now so that the City Council can be more familiar with the intent and scope of the planned action approach. No action is required at this time. Next Steps Next steps include: July 31- City Council meeting for further discussion of the draft Highway 99 Subarea Plan, the related development regulations, and/or the planned action code. (Note: this may include a public hearing on the draft planned action code.) August 15 - City Council meeting for potential action on the Subarea Plan, the development regulations, and the planned action ordinance. (On a separate but related track, potential action may be considered for a multifamily tax exemption program to increase affordable housing opportunities.) Attachments: ATT. 1: City Council Minutes (Excerpt) 2017 ATT. 2: Set of Maps ATT. 3: CG District Draft 7.12.17 ATT. 4: Comparison Tables ATT. 5: Highway 99 Preliminary Draft Planned Action Ordinance Packet Pg. 619 8.2.a to call each Councilmember individually or send an email that may or may not be read. He recommended retaining the opportunity for public comment at committee meetings and having the meetings video - recorded and available on the City's website to achieve the goal of transparency. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC HEARING ON HIGHWAY 99 SUBAREA PLAN Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. Materials in packet including draft plan, Planning Board minutes and other materials and public comments online. she introduced John Fregonese, Principal, Fregonese Associates. Mr. Fregonese provided an aerial of the project area on Highway 99. He reviewed: • Planning Process o March - April 2016: Understanding existing conditions o April - June 2016: o April - Nov 2016: Develop land use and transportation scenarios o Oct - Dec 2016: Develop Sub -Area Draft plan o Dec - Feb 2017: Final Sub -Area Plan • March 2016 Public Workshop o Identified opportunities for new housing and business, community centers and services, and E infrastructure upgrades E o What did the public want? v • May 2016 Open House d o Revealed near and long-term development and transportation opportunities and its impacts m • November 2016 Open House o Revealed implementation strategies and policy recommendations o Public had opportunity to review the recommendations at the Open House and online and N provide feedback o Community values: `' c ■ Connectivity g ■ Destinations T ■ Beautification ■ Safety ■ Walkability ■ Affordable housing ■ Healthy businesses Distinct Subdistricts o Major local and regional destinations on Hwy 99 ■ International District - Diverse restaurants, grocers and shops; major Korean business cluster Health District - Swedish Hospital and medical offices ■ Gateway District - Identified by the community during workshop - Desire for "gateway" and distinct transition point in and out of Edmonds Long segments without crossings 6 o Central area requires 10-minute walk to find safe crossing Housing development o Widespread desire for housing, particularly in south Q Mixed Use Development o Widespread desire for mixed use, particularly in south and central E z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q February 21, 2017 Page 6 Packet Pg. 620 8.2.a Pedestrian Crossing o More mid -block crossings throughout Key Assets in Corridor Area o Opportunity to build on the momentum of ongoing improvements in Shoreline along Hwy 99 o High -quality transit facilities already in place providing links to housing, jobs and amenities in the region o Distinct districts already emerging — International and Health Districts — that provide core services and o amenities o Already a mixed -use district with retail uses adjacent to single- and multi -family housing o Business, developer community and residents are ready to see positive changes to create a safe, walkable, healthy place Mr. Fregonese reviewed Implementation Strategies, Policy Recommendations + Actions • Draft Zoning & Development Recommendations o o Strengthen Economic Opportunity v ■ Support unique business clusters such as International District and Health District ■ Major auto sales facilities remain important to the local economy. Pedestrian Activity Zone standard will allow auto sales to continue business as usual ■ Strengthen and continue support for business orgs. in county and state E ■ Pursue broadband internet throughout corridor to attract high-tech business investment v ■ Consider unique designs for streetscape improvements such as signage and lighting o Encourage Sustainable Building Practices ■ Transit and pedestrian -friendly development with less reliance on automobile trips, should be promoted through new design standards �? ■ Consider requiring electric vehicle charging facilities especially within new residential N developments and bicycle facilities N ■ Encourage use of solar panels and green building practices v o Map of proposed update to Comprehensive Plan designations ■ Health District International District LA ■ Gateway District o Current Zoning Map r� ■ The only difference between CG and CG2 is the height limit (CG = 60' and CG2 = 75') N ■ Many current zones are remnants from the counties antiquated zoning ■ Many zones do not match with the parcel boundaries o Proposed Zoning Map x ■ The proposal is to change these zones to the consolidated CG zone w ■ Incorporate design standards directly into zones to ensure scale transition into neighborhoods c ■ More predictable outcomes for community o Comprehensive Plan Map ■ New zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map o Strengthen current design standards U ■ Incorporate them directly into the zoning code ■ Consideration of special circumstances within the corridor will be made to ensure the t� standards are feasible, such as large parcels that would have multiple buildings if redeveloped and parcels with unique access or transportation challenges may require a modified approach to the design standards. Q o Changes to Access and Parking m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q February 21, 2017 Page 7 Packet Pg. 621 8.2.a ■ Issue Today: current standards allow too much parking in the front of buildings, which negatively effects the pedestrian environment and hinders redevelopment potential c o Existing District -based Design Standards Hwy 99 Corridor CG/CG2 - criteria ■ Access and Parking - Not more than 50 percent of total project parking spaces may be located between the M building's front facade and the primary street. Parking lots may not be located on corner locations adjacent to public streets C :r o Recommended Design Standards for Urban Areas M ■ Parking Predominately on Side or Rear - Parking areas may comprise 40% or less of street frontage - Better design than current standard: no more than 50% of total project parking spaces m may be located between building's front facade and the primary street E ■ Buildings on the Street Frontage o - Primary Frontage - min. 50% of primary street frontage should have buildings within > 10 feet of front property line (at the edge of Pedestrian Activity Zone) o - All Other Frontages - 50% of side and rear street frontages to have buildings, walls, or hedges at least 4 feet in height, within 10 ft of property line �? ■ Ground Floor Transparency - 50% of Primary Frontage building facade within 10 feet of frontage lot line be made L m of transparent windows and doors. All other building frontages require 30% E transparency. c o Current Standards v ■ Screening and Buffering - Parking lots - Type IV landscaping, minimum four feet wide, is required along all street frontages. m ➢ This standard creates landscaped barriers between pedestrians and buildings rather than enhancing a safe and comfortable pedestrian zone o Changes to Screening and Buffering "Pedestrian Activity Zone" N ■ Replace with required 10-foot Pedestrian Activity Zone - Allows for a range of active uses like sidewalk cafes and amenities such as public art, "7 street furniture, street trees, bus shelters, pavement patterns, lighting, etc. o - Expanded Sidewalk Width ■ Amenity Space - Outdoor amenity space, such as landscaping, benches, etc. should be required in conjunction with development c - A portion of the required amenity space should be provided as common space and N may include pedestrian areas Q- o New Stepback Design Standards x ■ No current stepback regulations exist w ■ Purpose: Ensure a transition in height and bulk between multifamily/mixed-use buildings in commercial zones and adjacent single family zones, while enabling more housing options to be built adjacent to Hwy 99 S o Recommended Front Setback for Multifamily and Mixed -Use Adjacent to Single Family - Zones c ■ GROUND FLOOR SETBACK o - For frontages on Highway 99, require a front setback of 10 feet to accommodate a Pedestrian Activity Zone. j - For frontages not on Highway 99, reduce frontage setbacks to 5 foot and encourage enhanced pedestrian realm (larger sidewalks, useable landscaping, etc.). - Keep current 15 feet setback and 10' landscaping requirements for lot line adjacency Q with single family zones. c m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q February 21, 2017 Page 8 Packet Pg. 622 8.2.a o Recommended Front Stepback for Multifamily and Mixed -Use Adjacent to Single Family Zones UPPER FLOOR SETBACK - Zero setback up to 25 feet in height (30 feet is the maximum height in RM 1.5, which is the predominant zone surrounding the commercial zones on Highway 99). - 10 foot setback beyond 25 feet in height on sides with lot line adjacency to single family zones - 20 foot setback beyond 55 feet in height on sides with lot line adjacency to single family zones - 8 foot stepback beyond 30 feet in height on sides across a street from single family zones - Stepback areas can be used for active outdoor space such as balconies. o Recommended Transit -Supportive Parking Standards ■ Reduce minimums; follow market demand for parking - Residential ➢ Current: Studio: 1.2 / 1-Bedroom: 1.5 / 2-Bedroom: 1.8 / 3-Bedroom: 2 ➢ Recommended: One space per unit that is less than 700 sq. ft. - Commercial ➢ Current: 2.5 per 1,000 square feet (1 per 400 sq ft) ➢ Recommended: 2 per 1,000 square feet - Exempt first 3,000 sq ft of commercial uses within mixed -use buildings that have a shared parking plan (parking study and management plan) ➢ Reduces cost burden for small, local entrepreneurs ➢ Staff decision on compliance Mr. Fregonese continued his review: N • Draft Affordable Housing Recommendations o Define Hwy 99 area as a "target area" to allow Multi -Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) T projects ■ Pass ordinance to enable MFTE project in Hwy 99 area ■ All residential -portion of building value tax exempt for 12 years with at least 20% affordable units o Continue to enhance fee waiver program for affordable housing ■ Enhance its City program to allow the reduction of transportation and park impact fees for projects that include affordable housing o Mixed -Use, Mixed -Income Demonstration Project ■ Identify site with willing owner or City purchase/transferrable option ■ Actively recruit developers (non-profit; public -private) ■ Pilot project for new MFTE and fee waiver programs, and other possible special assessment districts o Other Affordable Housing and Infrastructure Finance Recommendations ■ Key Financing Tools and Funding Sources to Pursue v - City Fund for Redevelopment and Affordable Housing - Community Renewal Area (CRA) - used in Shoreline v - Hospital Benefit Zone (HBZ) Financing Program - Local Infrastructure Project Area (LIPA) Financing - Landscape Conservation and Local Improvement Program (LCLIP) Q - Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) - HUD HOME Program z V c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q February 21, 2017 Page 9 Packet Pg. 623 8.2.a - HUD CDBG Program - Enterprise Community Partiers Regional Equitable Development Initiative c Draft Signage & Wayfinding RecommendationsIL o Gateway Signage at Hwy 99/Hwy 104 interchange o Transit Gateway Signage/Station at Hwy 99/228th M o Improve wayfinding signage along corridor ■ Identify downtown, Lake Ballinger, multiuse path (Interurban Trail), new regional rail, International District, Health District, other activity nodes M o Unique District Design Identity d ■ Branding, public/local art, street furniture, unique bus shelter designs, pavement patterns, special lighting fixtures, colored crosswalks, banners, etc. o Prohibit new pole signs E Draft Transportation Recommendations 2 o Improve Transit Transfers: m ■ Unify/consolidate BRT and local transit stops to reduce walking distance for transfers o o Hwy 99 and 228th will be Key Intersection C9 ■ 228th will connect Edmonds to regional rail in Mountlake Terrace. v ■ Shuttle/transit service from Hwy 99 to regional rail station ■ Consolidated transit stop at 228th ■ New BRT station E ■ Clear signage o ■ High quality bike connection on 228th v o Incentivize Alternative Transportation Options: ■ Car Share/Bike Share ■ On -site bike parking ■ Ride sharing services (Uber, Lyft) ■ Electric car charging stations N N ■ Incentives: Impact fee reductions and parking requirement offsets for providing dedicated '" accommodating alternative transportation options on -site "' c Draft Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations 2 o Expand use of grant programs to fund safety improvements and pedestrian facilities ■ Safe Route to School Program ■ Pedestrian and Bicycle Program r� ■ Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) N ■ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ) o Proposed Short & Long -Term Transportation Improvements ■ Transportation Goals: x - Improve pedestrian safety and access to/from Hwy 99 corridor w - Improve pedestrian environment along Hwy 99 corridor - Safe pedestrian crossing of Hwy 99 and access to transit c - Improved transit mobility and transit stop environment - Improved traffic flow and general safety with access management ■ Key Recommended Transportation Improvements - Close the most significant gap in the pedestrian crossings within the corridor U - 238th to 228th - a distance of 3,700 ft. - has no controlled pedestrian crossing - Improve pedestrian access from the south at the SR 104 interchange t� - Long-term recommendation: Reconfigure ramps to conventional 90-degree stop control intersections - Short-term recommendation: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) Q with high visibility crosswalk c m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q February 21, 2017 Page 10 Packet Pg. 624 8.2.a - Encourage walking and biking to access plan Highway 99 from surrounding neighborhoods - "Complete Streets" - sidewalks, safety lighting, street lighting, pedestrian -scaled lighting, drainage improvements, etc. - Streets that can be safely traveled by pedestrians and bicyclists experience travel during the day - Improve connections between transit and major employment centers ➢ Swift Stations at 216th and the Swedish Hospital Campus: pedestrian walkway system within campus with wayfinding o Maps of Planned Transportation Improvements and Project Supportive Improvements, identifying the location of: ■ Improvement Index Number ■ Existing Signalized Intersection and Ped Xing ■ Proposed New Traffic Signal and Pedestrian Crossing ■ Intersection Safety & Capacity Improvements ■ New Bike Route Designation ■ New Class II Bicycle Lanes ■ Street Improvements for Pedestrians ■ Access Management (Raised Medians) ■ Pedestrian Hybrid Signal (HAWK) o Photographs of: ■ Health District Gateway - Today - With initial public investments - With corresponding private investments ■ SW 234t' - Today - With initial public investments - With corresponding private investment at night will Implement a Transportation Next Steps: o March 21 - City Council Hearing of Subarea Plan o March 22 - Open House for Planned Action EIS o April 12 - Planning Board public hearing on Development Code Amendments and Planned Action Ordinance (PAO) o May 9 - City Council public hearing on Dev. Code and PAO o June 5 - Subarea Plan, Dev. Code Amendments and PAO Adoption Further information such as project updates, workshop results, upcoming events and more are available at www. EdmondsHWY99. ors. Councilmember Buckshnis said the packet is very thorough and well done and can address any questions the public has. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the Burlington Coat Factory property in the Gateway District and the Ranch Market in the International District, recalling Mr. Fregonese saying it may not be possible to redevelop certain areas like those in close proximity to the street. He asked what was envisioned for properties like those. Mr. Fregonese said in those situations, they recommend a functional slip lane where there is a major road with a smaller road for parking. A 1-2 lane parking lot with good crossings could be located in front of the building with pedestrian aspects to buffer pedestrians from the road. There may be places where the building could be located close to the road but have parking in front in areas where it is not feasible to walk along the road. Ms. Hope said the details would be specified in the code. N N N Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q February 21, 2017 Page 11 Packet Pg. 625 8.2.a Councilmember Nelson recognized this is a very ambitious plan that will provide more housing and more affordable housing. He requested Recommendation 2.3, the use of solar panels and green building practices even beyond current standards should be encouraged, be emphasized. If the goal is new development, it needs to be done in an environmentally sensitive way and provide opportunities for solar power and renewable energy sources. Mr. Fregonese agreed, commenting solar is becoming one of the cheapest sources new of new power, and is much more feasible than it was five years ago. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the commercial district around the medical center, a service industry that provides some commercial. He asked what kind of tax base those services provide the City and what other services were envisioned that would create economic development for the City. Mr. Fregonese answered uses that occur around a medical facility such as Swedish Hospital include medical offices, pharmacies, medical devices, imaging, etc. as well as uses that serve employees and customers of the hospital such as restaurants, coffee shops, personal services, etc. He summarized uses would include a mixture of those found in any employment concentrated area plus specific medical services. Councilmember Tibbott asked if his studies found opportunity for additional services in that area that justify making it a designated area on Highway 99. Mr. Fregonese answered yes, noting Swedish Hospital is not done expanding. The area is underserved now; there is a campus but not a lot of the services found around a more mature hospital to serve the hospital's customers and employees. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed the presentation did not identify specific types of affordable c housing such as low income or senior housing. Mr. Fregonese answered there is a variety of housing, it is V all feasible and these types of buildings are great for senior housing and low income housing but they have not specified a target. Ms. Hope said some market rate housing is also expected. Affordable housing m is a range of housing that includes low income, moderate income, workforce housing, etc. Market rate housing would help ensure it is a viable, lively neighborhood. Mr. Fregonese said proformas were done on all the redevelopment sites and designed at or slightly below the median market rate without N assistance/subsidy that 45% of median income could afford to rent. Market rate housing is not luxury housing; it is affordable to working incomes without a subsidy. The density and lack of parking means projects can be at lower, more competitive rates which allows the subsidy to go further for the affordable o component. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented affordable housing is not necessarily affordable for low income or seniors on a fixed income such as on Social Security. She relayed her understanding that that would all be possible, but it would depend on the interest of the property owners. Mr. Fregonese answered it will depend on the interest of the property owner and the advocacy of the lower income housing community to partner. He referred to the recommendation to do a mixed income housing demonstration project, an area where the City can provide leadership on a private -public partnership that will provide market rate housing and affordable housing of some type. A demonstration project will put in place a path forward to catalyze other development. That cannot be regulated; the City will need to be opportunistic and look for partners to put that together. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked about the plans for 238th near Safeway where the primary r- crossings are located and where people congregate to catch SWIFT. Mr. Fregonese referred to the map, v identifying a bike path, pedestrian enhance, SWIFT stops on both sides, access controls, and a pedestrian crossing in that area. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if there were plans for any housing in that j area. Mr. Fregonese pointed out properties (purple on the map) where redevelopment was most feasible. He assured that was just a guess, it could happen anywhere but newer buildings or properties with an active business were unlikely to redevelop. Q Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q February 21, 2017 Page 12 Packet Pg. 626 8.2.a Wendy Kendall, Edmonds, referred to the photograph of the SW 234th intersection on Highway 99 where it appeared lanes were lost. She expressed concern with the existing traffic on Highway 99 and feared additional signals would further affect traffic flow. She asked if there was any prediction on property tax increases for residences within a couple blocks of Highway 99. Rich Senderoff, Edmonds, recalled when he served on a previous Economic Development Commission, there was often discussion about the concept of a hotel on Highway 99, especially one near the hospital. When Swedish first acquired Stevens, representatives making a presentation to the EDC also talked about the need for hotel for people visiting patients that could also serve players and patrons of the nearby ice rink where Pac-12 hockey is played. In addition to residential, he suggested including concepts that would attract a hotel group and possibly involving Swedish Hospital in that effort. Marjory Green, Edmonds, asked whether the new buildings would be higher. She has heard there will be major changes at Mill Park Condominiums at 2241h & Highway 99 and asked if there were any plans for changes in that area. Rebecca Wolfe, Edmonds, suggested the City contact American Council for an Energy -Efficient Economy, ACEEE.org who has stated through more conservation and clean renewable energy such as wind and solar, the United States can be completely off fossil fuels by 2030. She encouraged the Council to think of every possibility to save energy for renters. Robert Siew, owner of the property where Burlington Coat Factory is currently located, said the design requirement to have building close to the road works great if the traffic is slow and there is parking on m both sides but it is difficult to achieve on all parcels on Highway 99 and imposing a uniform requirement may impede the design for specific developers. His property is a classic example; he has attended all the Highway 99 Subarea Plan meetings and has been in contact with Ms. Hope and the design consultant who N are aware of his concerns. There are only a few large parcels on Highway 99 like theirs such as Aurora Marketplace and Ranch Market. For large parcels, especially those with existing buildings with tenants, it "7 is difficult to develop the entire parcel at once because a new building at the street will block the existing o business' visibility. They are anxious to try a mixed -use development on the former McFinster's site with retail on the bottom floor and residential above. They have a 30-year lease with Burlington who does not want anything further west than their building that would block their visibility. With that requirement, they will not be able to redevelop the restaurant property. He encouraged the Council to allow as much c flexibility as possible to address issues on specific parcels to avoid impeding development. N a L Imad Bahbah, Principal, IHB Architects, Kent, said he represents a developer who has been through x the pre -application process for a housing mixed use project off 238th. He expressed support for the w Council's approval of the Highway 99 Subarea Plan in hopes of gaining developer incentives. The initial proposal was .75 stalls per unit and was increased to 1.0 for 700 square feet. He encouraged the Council to reduce that to stay competitive particularly in a transit -oriented zone and inquired about the parking ratio for units over 700 square feet. They postponed their project to see how the plan develops and in — hopes of better incentives including the MFTE. He encouraged Council to approve the Subarea Plan so they can proceed with development of their project, 7 stories, approximately 68 units if the parking ratios v work, and about 4500 square feet of retail on the first level, pedestrian oriented, etc. He was glad to hear the community and citizens in the area were supportive of housing in the area and suggested publicizing j that on the City's website attract to development. Susie Schaefer, Edmonds, suggested including incentives for native plants in the plan. She saw this as a Q great opportunity because native plants have a better chance for survival, plants and trees makes it more c m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q February 21, 2017 Page 13 Packet Pg. 627 8.2.a of a neighborhood and make an area more inviting. She pointed out Shoreline is looking a lot better and native plants give a place class. Bee Wilson, Edmonds, said she lives downtown but has grandchildren and great-grandchildren growing up near 228th & 80th. She thanked the Council for the study. As the plan will lead to more people, roof space, etc. she suggested including raingardens and bioswales in the plan as well as considering pervious pavement. Stanley Piha, Edmonds, a member of the former Highway 99 Task Force, acknowledged the work done by staff and the consultant on the plan. He supported blanketing the subarea with the General Commercial Zone including parcels that are currently zoned RM2.4. Glenda Smith, Edmonds, said she lives close to Ranch Market and is very worried about the proposed plan. At a recent Mill Park Condominium HOA meeting, the Board informed her that half their building is residential and the other half is commercial. She lives in the half that is zoned commercial and is worried they may be bought out. She asked whether that was a possibility. Patrick Doherty, speaking on behalf of the Economic Development Commission, summarized a memo the Commission emailed to the Council: • Commercial development is important within the corridor. Would like to see a commercial component in mixed use building • It is important that the Council act quickly on plan. There is interest from the development community, want to capitalize on the current economic climate. • Once the plan and zoning are approved, an open house or event should be held to attract developers to the community. • Supportive of any incentives for development N • Supportive of proposal to find a way to create a catalyst project • Interested in more specificity regarding how to enhance the sense of the International District as a special place c Seth Hale, Seattle, an architect, recommended the Council adopt a plan that will provide a lot of design flexibility, and give architects an opportunity to provide design alternatives and create unique environments. With regard to the stepbacks, he observed the proposal for an 8-foot stepback for property across the street from residential at 30 feet above the street. He suggested the height be coordinated with the stepback for properties adjacent to single family so that the stepback for a building on a corner would occur at the same location. He pointed out 30 feet is an awkward elevation for that change as typically the first floor would be 15 feet and upper residential floors 10 feet. Bruce Witenberg, Edmonds, congratulated the Development Services Department on the public process; for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. The public meetings were well attended and included thoughtful questions and commentary. Despite the long process, he echoed the concerns of some citizens that the 2 draft plan has only been available to the public for a week. The breadth of this plan is unlike anything the City has contemplated recently, affecting several square miles and residents need additional time to absorb the complexities presented in the plan and to continue to offer input. He was glad the schedule �j offers these opportunities. After a brief review, he offered the following comments: ➢ Would like to see further discussion of the transportation study and hoped the study would take into v account the plan's effect on some of the most affordable housing in Edmonds, the single family residences in and beyond the proposed zoning in the plan. ➢ The plan identifies Gateway, International and Hospital Districts but he could not visualize where Q additional housing necessary to help the City achieve its GMA targets would be located in the Gateway District. E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q February 21, 2017 Page 14 Packet Pg. 628 8.2.a ➢ Shaded areas (packet page 257) identifying housing development, do not show the number units or residents and he recommended providing more specificity. ➢ Strongly support transit oriented development including limited parking for multi -family residential units off the Highway 99 corridor. Limiting the amount of parking, perhaps even more than the plans suggests, is a good method for accomplishing the goal of transit oriented affordable housing. He looked forward to having additional opportunities to comment on the plan. He agreed with Mr. Senderoff's comments about a hotel on Highway 99 and summarized the redevelopment plan for the highway was generally quite exciting and if brought to fruition would greatly enhance Edmonds' portion of Highway 99. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public hearing. Mayor Earling advised another public hearing is scheduled on March 21. Ms. Hope said there will be several more opportunities for public input. This is the first public hearing before the City Council; the Planning Board held a public hearing and an earlier draft of the plan was available to the public. No decisions are requested tonight. She offered to develop a Q&A response for the questions that arose during the public hearing as well as talk to individuals with specific questions. The EIS will also answer some questions. Mayor Earling summarized this a work in progress; this is the first step as far as the Council having an opportunity to ask questions and hear public comment. 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE REPORTING OF LOST OR STOLEN FIREARMS Councilmember Nelson reported since the Council last considered this ordinance, he spoke with Beth Ford, Lighthouse Law Group, and Seattle's City Attorney as well as Seattle Councilmember Tim Burgess, the author of Seattle's ordinance. Ms. Ford was satisfied with information she received from N Seattle's City Attorney regarding the ordinance. Councilmember Nelson pointed out the Department of Justice views lost and stolen firearms as posing a substantial threat to public safety and law enforcement. He believed the proposed ordinance would, 1) promote public safety by enabling law enforcement to better track illegal guns used in the commission of crimes, 2) help return lost guns to their rightful owners, and 3) protect gun owners from being wrongly implicated in crimes committed with their lost or stolen guns. As a gun owner, he did not take anything to do with firearms lightly. The Pledge of Alliance says liberty and justice for all; he asked where was the justice for the thousands of victims who have are killed every year by guns that citizens fail to report as stolen or missing. Councilmember Buckshnis explained she raised this with Councilmember Nelson last October. She was shocked by the number of guns that are stolen, used in crimes and the number of children killed by guns that were not stored safely. She offered to provide the data she had collected, noting a great deal of information was available from Everytown for Gun Safety. She expressed her support for the ordinance. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, c TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 4060, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, V WASHINGTON, REQUIRING THE REPORTING OF LOST AND STOLEN FIREARMS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. U 2. CITY COUNCIL MEETING FORMAT AND POTENTIAL COMMITTEE STRUCTURE Q Council President Mesaros explained the proposal is for three committees; the key issue is the format of the meetings. The proposal is for committees to meet on the ls` and P Tuesdays from 7:15 — 8:15 p.m., z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q February 21, 2017 Page 15 Packet Pg. 629 8.2.a questions he wants to bring up on the record next week. He suggested a motion to extend the response deadline to April 30. Mayor Earling suggested that decision be made next week. Councilmember Nelson looked forward to voting next week. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. POTENTIAL ACTION ON THE HIGHWAY 99 SUBAREA PLAN Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced John Fregonese, Principal, Fregonese Associates, who provided an aerial of the project area on Highway 99 and reviewed: • Planning Process o March - April 2016: o April - June 2016: Understanding existing conditions o April - Nov 2016: Develop land use and transportation scenarios o Oct - Dec 2016: Develop Sub -Area Draft plan o Dec - Feb 2017: Final Sub -Area Plan • March 2016 Public Workshop o Identified opportunities for new housing and business, community centers and services, and infrastructure upgrades o What did the public want? • May 2016 Open House o Revealed near and long-term development and transportation opportunities and its impacts • November 2016 Open House o Revealed implementation strategies and policy recommendations o Public had opportunity to review the recommendations at the Open House and online and provide feedback o Community values: ■ Connectivity ■ Destinations ■ Beautification ■ Safety ■ Walkability ■ Affordable housing ■ Healthy businesses • Distinct Subdistricts o Major local and regional destinations on Hwy 99 ■ International District - Diverse restaurants, grocers and shops; major Korean business cluster ■ Health District - Swedish Hospital and medical offices ■ Gateway District - Identified by the community during workshop - Desire for "gateway" and distinct transition point in and out of Edmonds Long segments without crossings o Central area requires 10-minute walk to find safe crossing Housing development o Widespread desire for housing, particularly in south Mixed Use Development N N N Q c m E z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q March 21, 2017 Page 18 Packet Pg. 630 8.2.a o Widespread desire for mixed use, particularly in south and central Pedestrian Crossing o More mid -block crossings throughout Key Assets in Corridor Area o Opportunity to build on the momentum of ongoing improvements in Shoreline along Hwy 99 o High -quality transit facilities already in place providing links to housing, jobs and amenities in the region o Distinct districts already emerging — International and Health Districts — that provide core services and amenities o Already a mixed -use district with retail uses adjacent to single- and multi -family housing o Business, developer community and residents are ready to see positive changes to create a safe, walkable, healthy place Mr. Fregonese reviewed Implementation Strategies, Policy Recommendations + Actions • Draft Zoning & Development Recommendations o o Strengthen Economic Opportunity v ■ Support unique business clusters such as International District and Health District ■ Major auto sales facilities remain important to the local economy. Pedestrian Activity Zone standard will allow auto sales to continue business as usual ■ Strengthen and continue support for business orgs. in county and state E ■ Pursue broadband internet throughout corridor to attract high-tech business investment v ■ Consider unique designs for streetscape improvements such as signage and lighting o Encourage Sustainable Building Practices ■ Transit and pedestrian -friendly development with less reliance on automobile trips, should be promoted through new design standards �? ■ Consider requiring electric vehicle charging facilities especially within new residential N developments and bicycle facilities N ■ Encourage use of solar panels and green building practices v o Map of proposed update to Comprehensive Plan designations ■ Health District International District LA ■ Gateway District o Current Zoning Map r� ■ The only difference between CG and CG2 is the height limit (CG = 60' and CG2 = 75') N ■ Many current zones are remnants from the counties antiquated zoning ■ Many zones do not match with the parcel boundaries o Proposed Zoning Map x ■ The proposal is to change these zones to the consolidated CG zone w ■ Incorporate design standards directly into zones to ensure scale transition into neighborhoods c ■ More predictable outcomes for community o Comprehensive Plan Map ■ New zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map o Strengthen current design standards 0 ■ Incorporate them directly into the zoning code ■ Consideration of special circumstances within the corridor will be made to ensure the t� standards are feasible, such as large parcels that would have multiple buildings if redeveloped and parcels with unique access or transportation challenges may require a modified approach to the design standards. Q o Changes to Access and Parking m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q March 21, 2017 Page 19 Packet Pg. 631 8.2.a ■ Issue Today: current standards allow too much parking in the front of buildings, which negatively effects the pedestrian environment and hinders redevelopment potential c o Existing District -based Design Standards Hwy 99 Corridor CG/CG2 - criteria ■ Access and Parking - Not more than 50 percent of total project parking spaces may be located between the M building's front facade and the primary street. Parking lots may not be located on corner locations adjacent to public streets C :r o Recommended Design Standards for Urban Areas M ■ Parking Predominately on Side or Rear - Parking areas may comprise 40% or less of street frontage - Better design than current standard: no more than 50% of total project parking spaces m may be located between building's front facade and the primary street E ■ Buildings on the Street Frontage o - Primary Frontage - min. 50% of primary street frontage should have buildings within > 10 feet of front property line (at the edge of Pedestrian Activity Zone) o - All Other Frontages - 50% of side and rear street frontages to have buildings, walls, or hedges at least 4 feet in height, within 10 ft of property line �? ■ Ground Floor Transparency - 50% of Primary Frontage building facade within 10 feet of frontage lot line be made L m of transparent windows and doors. All other building frontages require 30% E transparency. C o Current Standards v ■ Screening and Buffering - Parking lots - Type IV landscaping, minimum four feet wide, is required along all street frontages. m ➢ This standard creates landscaped barriers between pedestrians and buildings rather than enhancing a safe and comfortable pedestrian zone o Changes to Screening and Buffering "Pedestrian Activity Zone" N ■ Replace with required 10-foot Pedestrian Activity Zone - Allows for a range of active uses like sidewalk cafes and amenities such as public art, "7 street furniture, street trees, bus shelters, pavement patterns, lighting, etc. o - Expanded Sidewalk Width ■ Amenity Space - Outdoor amenity space, such as landscaping, benches, etc. should be required in conjunction with development c - A portion of the required amenity space should be provided as common space and N may include pedestrian areas Q- o New Stepback Design Standards x ■ No current stepback regulations exist w ■ Purpose: Ensure a transition in height and bulk between multifamily/mixed-use buildings in commercial zones and adjacent single family zones, while enabling more housing options to be built adjacent to Hwy 99 S o Recommended Front Setback for Multifamily and Mixed -Use Adjacent to Single Family - Zones c ■ GROUND FLOOR SETBACK o - For frontages on Highway 99, require a front setback of 10 feet to accommodate a Pedestrian Activity Zone. j - For frontages not on Highway 99, reduce frontage setbacks to 5 foot and encourage enhanced pedestrian realm (larger sidewalks, useable landscaping, etc.). - Keep current 15 feet setback and 10' landscaping requirements for lot line adjacency Q with single family zones. c m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q March 21, 2017 Page 20 Packet Pg. 632 8.2.a o Recommended Front Stepback for Multifamily and Mixed -Use Adjacent to Single Family Zones UPPER FLOOR SETBACK - Zero setback up to 25 feet in height (30 feet is the maximum height in RM 1.5, which is the predominant zone surrounding the commercial zones on Highway 99). - 10 foot setback beyond 25 feet in height on sides with lot line adjacency to single family zones - 20 foot setback beyond 55 feet in height on sides with lot line adjacency to single family zones - 8 foot stepback beyond 30 feet in height on sides across a street from single family zones - Stepback areas can be used for active outdoor space such as balconies. o Recommended Transit -Supportive Parking Standards ■ Reduce minimums; follow market demand for parking - Residential ➢ Current: Studio: 1.2 / 1-Bedroom: 1.5 / 2-Bedroom: 1.8 / 3-Bedroom: 2 ➢ Recommended: One space per unit that is less than 700 sq. ft. - Commercial ➢ Current: 2.5 per 1,000 square feet (1 per 400 sq ft) ➢ Recommended: 2 per 1,000 square feet - Exempt first 3,000 sq ft of commercial uses within mixed -use buildings that have a shared parking plan (parking study and management plan) ➢ Reduces cost burden for small, local entrepreneurs ➢ Staff decision on compliance Mr. Fregonese continued his review: N • Draft Affordable Housing Recommendations N N o Define Hwy 99 area as a "target area" to allow Multi -Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) projects ■ Pass ordinance to enable MFTE project in Hwy 99 area g ■ All residential -portion of building value tax exempt for 12 years with at least 20% affordable units o Continue to enhance fee waiver program for affordable housing ■ Enhance its City program to allow the reduction of transportation and park impact fees N for projects that include affordable housing o Mixed -Use, Mixed -Income Demonstration Project ■ Identify site with willing owner or City purchase/transferrable option x ■ Actively recruit developers (non-profit; public -private) w ■ Pilot project for new MFTE and fee waiver programs, and other possible special assessment districts o Other Affordable Housing and Infrastructure Finance Recommendations ■ Key Financing Tools and Funding Sources to Pursue - - City Fund for Redevelopment and Affordable Housing - Community Renewal Area (CRA) - used in Shoreline v - Hospital Benefit Zone (HBZ) Financing Program - Local Infrastructure Project Area (LIPA) Financing v - Landscape Conservation and Local Improvement Program (LCLIP) - Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) - HUD HOME Program Q - HUD CDBG Program - Enterprise Community Partiers Regional Equitable Development Initiative z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q March 21, 2017 Page 21 Packet Pg. 633 8.2.a Draft Signage & Wayfinding Recommendations o Gateway Signage at Hwy 99/Hwy 104 interchange o Transit Gateway Signage/Station at Hwy 99/228th o Improve wayfinding signage along corridor ■ Identify downtown, Lake Ballinger, multiuse path (Interurban Trail), new regional rail, International District, Health District, other activity nodes o Unique District Design Identity ■ Branding, public/local art, street furniture, unique bus shelter designs, pavement patterns, special lighting fixtures, colored crosswalks, banners, etc. o Prohibit new pole signs Draft Transportation Recommendations o Improve Transit Transfers: ■ Unify/consolidate BRT and local transit stops to reduce walking distance for transfers o Hwy 99 and 228th will be Key Intersection ■ 228th will connect Edmonds to regional rail in Mountlake Terrace. ■ Shuttle/transit service from Hwy 99 to regional rail station ■ Consolidated transit stop at 228th ■ New BRT station ■ Clear signage ■ High quality bike connection on 228th o Incentivize Alternative Transportation Options: ■ Car Share/Bike Share ■ On -site bike parking ■ Ride sharing services (Uber, Lyft) m ■ Electric car charging stations �? ■ Incentives: Impact fee reductions and parking requirement offsets for providing dedicated N accommodating alternative transportation options on -site N Draft Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations ., o Expand use of grant programs to fund safety improvements and pedestrian facilities c ■ Safe Route to School Program 2 M Pedestrian and Bicycle Program LA ■ Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) ■ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ) r� o Proposed Short & Long -Term Transportation Improvements N ■ Transportation Goals: - Improve pedestrian safety and access to/from Hwy 99 corridor - Improve pedestrian environment along Hwy 99 corridor x - Safe pedestrian crossing of Hwy 99 and access to transit w - Improved transit mobility and transit stop environment - Improved traffic flow and general safety with access management c ■ Key Recommended Transportation Improvements - Close the most significant gap in the pedestrian crossings within the corridor - 238th to 228th - a distance of 3,700 ft. - has no controlled pedestrian crossing - Improve pedestrian access from the south at the SR 104 interchange U - Long-term recommendation: Reconfigure ramps to conventional 90-degree stop control intersections U - Short-term recommendation: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) with high visibility crosswalk 1-: - Encourage walking and biking to access plan Highway 99 from surrounding Q neighborhoods m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q March 21, 2017 Page 22 Packet Pg. 634 8.2.a - "Complete Streets" - sidewalks, safety lighting, street lighting, pedestrian -scaled lighting, drainage improvements, etc. - Streets that can be safely traveled by pedestrians and bicyclists experience travel during the day - Improve connections between transit and major employment centers ➢ Swift Stations at 216th and the Swedish Hospital Campus: pedestrian walkway system within campus with wayfinding o Maps of Planned Transportation Improvements and Project Supportive Improvements, identifying the location of: ■ Improvement Index Number ■ Existing Signalized Intersection and Ped Xing ■ Proposed New Traffic Signal and Pedestrian Crossing ■ Intersection Safety & Capacity Improvements ■ New Bike Route Designation ■ New Class II Bicycle Lanes ■ Street Improvements for Pedestrians ■ Access Management (Raised Medians) ■ Pedestrian Hybrid Signal (HAWK) o Photographs of: ■ Health District Gateway - Today - With initial public investments - With corresponding private investments SW 234th - Today - With initial public investments - With corresponding private investment at night will Implement a Transportation Next Steps: o March 21 - City Council disccussion of Subarea Plan o March 22 - Planning Board meeting for initial review/discussion of Development Code Amendments to implement the proposed Hwy 99 Subarea Plan o Early April - Open House for Draft EIS o April 12 - Planning Board public hearing on Development Code Amendments and Planned Action Ordinance (PAO) o May 9 - City Council public hearing on Development. Code and PAO o June 5 - City Council to consider adopting: a) Subarea Plan, b) Development Code Amendments, and c) PAO Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commended the plan, commenting this would be an improvement to the corridor and brighten the entire environment. She referred to the proposed zoning map, recommending the RM-2.4 zones be changed to CG. Mr. Fregonese said they have the Comprehensive Plan designation. Because there was development on the property that was not envisioned to redevelop, the zoning was not proposed to be changed. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas She preferred more contiguous CG zoning in the corridor for the future. Councilmember Johnson concurred this was a great plan but it needs fine tuning. For example at the beginning of the plan, there are three alternatives, but at the end there are only two and there is reference to the second alternative but the description is actually the third alternative. Mr. Fregonese agreed that could be clarified, explaining some of the residential options were combined for the EIS. N N N Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q March 21, 2017 Page 23 Packet Pg. 635 8.2.a Councilmember Johnson expressed interest in how the recommendations regarding transportation will be translated into the Comprehensive Plan as there is already a Transportation element. Ms. Hope answered staff is working with engineering; a number of the projects are already in the City's plans. If anything is not, it will presented to the Council as part of the Comprehensive Plan amendments at the end of the year. Councilmember Johnson commented on the lack of analysis about the importance of auto dealerships in the economic analysis but it did appear in a recommendation. The Highway 99 corridor has a number of auto dealerships which represent the number one revenue stream for the City. She recommended that be included in the economic analysis. Councilmember Johnson observed there is a lot of concern about bicycle connections across Highway 99 to the Interurban Trail, yet she did not see any specific recommendations. There are projects that come close to 76t' but the crossing of Highway 99 is missing at key connections to the Interurban Trail such as 220ffi. Councilmember Johnson observed the plan includes three districts, Gateway, International and Health; however, the Swift station in the Health District is the Gateway station. She recommended working with Community Transit to change the name of that station or develop a new name for the Gateway District. She referred to the proposed zoning map, expressing interest in establishing a strategy for Highway 99 in Esperance. Councilmember Tibbott liked how public input was incorporated into the plan. He asked about walkways U that move pedestrians from sidewalks along Highway 99 into the interior of projects. Mr. Fregonese answered the code requires a pedestrian path to connect building fronts. Councilmember Tibbott m commented on the importance of pathways through parking lots. He was encouraged to see the landscaping especially along the walkways in the pedestrian zone and separation from traffic. He expressed interest in locating affordable housing close to transit and recommended the plan address the N importance of affordable housing in those areas, even stating a preference for affordable housing in those areas. Council President Mesaros referred to the zoning map and inquired about the white area at the south end. Ms. Hope offered to research. With regard to Councilmember Johnson's comment about Esperance, Council President Mesaros suggested a future presentation identify the zoning on Highway 99 in Esperance to determine if it was compatible. Mr. Fregonese agreed that could be done. Ms. Hope assured the zoning in Esperance would be different than Edmonds. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the recommendation to allow MFTE projects and Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' suggestion about consistent CG zoning. Councilmember Nelson referred to the statement, "encourage use of solar panels and green building practices" and suggested changing it to "encourage and incentivize use of solar panels and green building practices." COUNCIL PRESIDENT MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, U TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:10 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Hope advised staff will return to Council with minor modifications; work will continue on next steps. Q 8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q March 21, 2017 Page 24 Packet Pg. 636 8.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out there would still a streetscape in front of the building with trees, and a sidewalk in front of the building. Mr. Fregonese agreed, noting amenity areas are also required in front of the building. 2. REVIEW OF PROPOSED HIGHWAY 99 AREA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Development Services Director Shane Hope explained this is the proposed code to implement the subarea plan. The Planning Board reviewed the code, held a public hearing and provided a recommendation. John Fregonese, Principal, Fregonese Associates, advised the development regulations have also been revised taking into account comments from property owners. He identified parcels on the zoning map proposed to be changed to the consolidated CG zone, commenting the new zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map. He reviewed: • Site development standards General 16.60.020 o The pedestrian area adjacent to the street is composed of three zones: the streetscape zone, the pedestrian zone, and the streetscape zone (Section 16.60.020.C.2) ■ Changed "amenity zone" to "streetscape zone" ■ Added dimensions o Additional building stepback when adjacent to RS zones ■ Upper Stories stepback 10' for 25' of building height; and 20' for 55' of building height • Site development standards — design standards 16.60.030.A. LE o 15' setback with 10' landscape buffer • A minimum five feet wide type IV landscaping is required along all street frontages where parking lots about the street. Section 16.60.030.A.I • Access and vehicle parking o All off-street surface parking shall be located to the side or rear of the primary building, except as otherwise specifically allowed by this chapter, and shall be screened from the sidewalk by a wall or plantings between 2 to 4 feet in height. o Outdoor parking areas shall comprise 40% or less of the public street frontage area within 100 feet of the primary street for the lot or tract and, on corner lots, may not be located at the corner. The requirements of this subsection do not apply to permitted auto sales uses. • Required electric vehicle charging stations (Section 16.60.030.B.5) o One or more electric vehicle charging stations must be provided for all new development that includes housing. • Bicycle storage spaces (Section 16.60.030.B.6) o Bicycle storage spaces for multifamily housing, excluding housing for assisted living or other specialized facilities, shall be provided for residents 0 1 bicycle storage space for each residential unit under 700 square feet and 2 bicycle storage spaces for each residential unit greater than 700 square feet • Paths within parking lots (Section 16.60.030.B.8) o Pedestrian walkways in parking lots shall be delineated by separate paved routes that meet federal accessibility requirements and that use a variation in textures and/or colors and may include landscape barriers and landscape islands • Pedestrian and transit access (Section 16.60.030.B.11) o Where a transit station or bus stop is located in front of or adjacent to a parcel, pedestrian connections linking the station or stop directly to the development are required. o Pedestrians routes shall connect buildings on the same site to each other • Site Development Standards — Site Design and Layout 16.60.030.0 o Alternative Pedestrian Oriented Design (Section 16.60.030.C.1) ■ At least 50% of a building's fagade facing the primary public street shall be located within 20 feet of the property line where the primary street frontage exists. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 6, 2017 Page 20 Packet Pg. 637 8.2.a ■ Building must include a prominent pedestrian entry on the primary frontage ■ Vehicle parking shall not be located within the first 20 feet of the primary street frontage, other than as allowed for vehicle sales use. o Alternative Walkable Design Area Option ■ For sites with unique constraints. ■ At least 50% of the building's facade facing the primary street shall be located within 60 feet of the front property line o Exceptions Process for Pedestrian and Walkable Design Options ■ Exemptions may be allowed by hearing examiner to provide for design flexibility that still encourages pedestrian orientation and efficient land uses under following criteria: - Property is located within 300 feet of highway interchange or has unique pedestrian access constraints - One or more buildings are located facing the primary street frontage - The development provides business and pedestrian areas near the primary street frontage and likely to be active through the day/evening. - At least 25% of required amenity space is located to connect building to the street - Where a site has multiple buildings, amenity space should be located between buildings to allow shared use - One or more buildings on the site must have at least two stories of usable space o Amenity space (Section 16.60.030.C.4) ■ An area equivalent to at least 5% of the building footprint shall be provided as amenity space. �- ■ If a vehicle parking area is being added to the site without the concurrent development of a� a building of at least 2,000 square feet, amenity space must be provided to equal at least m 5% of the additional parking area. ■ Example of amenity space in Costa Mesa, California 0 Building Design and Massing (Section 16.60.030.D.2) N ■ On the primary frontage, 50% of the building facade between two and 10 feet in height shall be comprised of windows or doors that are transparent Mr. Fregonese reviewed examples of buildings in Portland: o • New Seasons building on N Williams Street • Safeway on Hawthorne Boulevard • Safeway on Hwy 99/Barbur Boulevard r� • Fred Meyer on Interstate Avenue, N Mr. Fregonese provided photographs illustrating the Health District Gateway and SW 234th today, with initial public investment and corresponding private investment. Ms. Hope invited input from the Council and advised a public hearing is scheduled on June 20. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the recommendations section and desire for greater east and west connectivity and asked whether design standards would apply to east/west streets such as on 228th west of Hwy 99. Ms. Hope said the proposal applies to some of side streets in the district. Mr. Fregonese said every street, not just Hwy 99, has an amenity zone, landscaping, parking, buildings, etc. Benefits are most often realized with buildings on a corner due to the availability of additional space. Councilmember �j Tibbott relayed his understanding the design standards would apply to east -west corridors within the district. Ms. Hope agreed, noting in some areas that is several blocks. t� Councilmember Nelson referred to the examples of Safeway properties with solar panels. He asked if that was a decision made by Safeway or zoning requirements. Mr. Fregonese said it was Safeway's Q commitment to sustainability and tax credit programs that encourage that. Councilmember Nelson referred to changes in the Hwy 99 Plan related to sustainable practices and asked how to get that from the m E z M Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 6, 2017 Page 21 Packet Pg. 638 8.2.a plan into the code and provide incentives for green buildings. Ms. Hope said staff has been considering how to incentivize that. For example, not counting solar improvements in the building valuable for permit purposes although that is not a huge amount. There are some applicable State programs that may be more attractive than City programs. Staff is open to ways to encourage it via a financial incentive. Mr. Fregonese said there are non -profits in the Northwest that work with large organizations like Safeway to develop programs, financing, tax credits, etc. He suggested contacting the non -profits and referring developers to them. Safeway's program has a 3'/Z year payback. Councilmember Johnson recalled in the Westgate plan, there were step -backs from SR-104 to provide a less imposing facade for motorists and pedestrians. She asked if step -backs from Hwy 99 had been considered. Mr. Fregonese answered it was considered but some of the lots are very small and step -backs eliminate buildable space that make development feasible. He understood the desire for step -backs adjacent to single family but there was not a cost -benefit for a step -backs on Hwy 99. Councilmember Johnson commented it was possible full buildout at 220t'' could have 5-7 foot buildings on all 4 corners. Ms. Hope pointed out Hwy 99 is 100 feet wide plus the setback which provides a much wider space in this corridor. Councilmember Johnson commented a lot of builders are providing parking on the first floor and asked if that would be allowed. Ms. Hope said it would be unusual due to the 50% glazing requirement. Mr. Fregonese said there is often tuck -under parking in back. That could be addressed by requiring a certain percentage of the ground floor not be parking. Councilmember Johnson supported adding that. Councilmember Johnson referred to fake fagades along the sidewalk at 196t' and Hwy 99 in Lynnwood where there is no street access to individual buildings. Mr. Fregonese said the plan requires a pedestrian path from the sidewalk to the building and windows and doors are required on the frontage. Councilmember Johnson asked if building towers with higher density are allowed on the north end or the N corridor. Ms. Hope answered it is the same as currently exists; there is no height limit in the area of the hospital. Councilmember Johnson asked if that included the area near Funtasia, recalling there was a °'' redevelopment proposal in that area. Ms. Hope said building heights are limited to six stories in that area. o Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed she has received calls from residents concerned with cut -through traffic on the east side of Hwy 99 and potentially other areas. She asked how single-family residences would be protected from their local streets becoming arterials. Ms. Hope said that has not been specifically addressed. Mr. Fregonese said transportation improvements in the plan include traffic calming, signals, pedestrian crossings, etc. to slow and calm traffic, rather than to facilitate higher speeds. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said residents have expressed interest in traffic calming devices to keep traffic speeding from SR-104 to the freeway. Mr. Fregonese said that may be one of the first things the City wants to consider. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Chapter 16.60 that addresses the CG zones and asked if that was specific to the Hwy 99 area, recalling there was CG2 zoned property in other areas. Ms. Hope answered there was only one contract CG2 rezone area and this would not apply to that area. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the example provided of the Hawthorne Safeway, and said that is where she shopped. She asked whether in additional to a financial incentive for solar panels, could the City offer a faster permit process for large buildings. Ms. Hope answered the challenge is offering a faster permit process for some projects results in delays for other projects. Q Mayor Earling announced there would a 10-minute executive session at the end of the agenda. c m 3. RFP FOR BASELINE STUDY OF EDMONDS MARSH E z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 6, 2017 Page 22 Packet Pg. 639 8.2.a Councilmember Tibbott asked if that included critical areas. Mr. Lien said one of the critical area regulations that applies in the RS-12 zone that does not apply in R-8 is the 30% native vegetation requirement. An application for this property would require at least 30% of the site to be set aside in native vegetation; there are also steep slopes on the site that will require geotech analysis. He summarized the biggest difference was the 30% native vegetation requirement that applies to RS-12 not RS-8 zones. Councilmember Buckshnis clarified there is no application, and she did not want to speculate on the number lots. Mr. Lien said the number of lots he cited was based on a straight density requirement but there are many issues on the site that would reduce that number. He assured there was no application, the Council was only considering the rezone tonight. Mayor Earling opened public participation from parties of record. Hearing no public comment, Mayor Earling closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT MESAROS, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 4071, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVING A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY SUBJECT TO CONTRACT REZONE R- 97-28 FROM CONTRACT RS-8 TO RS-12; AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 9. STUDY ITEMS 1. REVIEW OF UPDATES TO PROPOSED HIGHWAY 99 SUBAREA PLAN Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced John Fregonese, Principal, Fregonese Associates. Mr. Fregonese explained since the public hearing minor changes have been made to the plan, the EIS prepared and ensured consistency between the EIS, plan and zoning. He displayed the project timeline, explaining the project is in the final adoption process. He announced: • Upcoming EIS Open House — June 20th o Opportunity for the public to learn about the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on Tuesday, June 20 at 6pm in the Brackett Room at City Hall. o Public Comment period: June 2 through July 3, 2017 ■ Submit written comments to: City of Edmonds Development Services Attn: Robert Chave, Manager — Planning Division 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Or via email: planning@edmondswa.gov Mr. Fregonese reviewed: • Community values: o Connectivity o Destinations o Beautification o Safety o Walkability o Affordable housing o Healthy businesses N N N Q c m E z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 6, 2017 Page 14 Packet Pg. 640 8.2.a • Distinct Subdistricts o Major local and regional destinations on Hwy 99 ■ International District - Diverse restaurants, grocers and shops; major Korean business cluster ■ Health District - Swedish Hospital and medical offices ■ Gateway District - Identified by the community during workshop - Desire for "gateway" and distinct transition point in and out of Edmonds Key Assets in Corridor Area o Opportunity to build on the momentum of ongoing improvements in Shoreline along Hwy 99 o High -quality transit facilities already in place providing links to housing, jobs and amenities in the region o Distinct districts already emerging - International and Health Districts - that provide core services and amenities o Already a mixed -use district with retail uses adjacent to single- and multi -family housing o Business, developer community and residents are ready to see positive changes to create a safe, walkable, healthy place Alternative Scenarios o Alternative 1: No Action ■ -Future growth would continue based on existing development regulations and past trends ■ -Higher intensity mixed -use and residential buildings would be unfeasible under this scenario m ■ -As a result, commercial development would continue to be primary use along Hwy 99 �? o Alternative 2: Preferred Alternative N ■ -Higher intensity mixed -use growth - greater balance of residential, commercial, and N office use ■ -Transportation improvements to increase east/west connectivity, provide greater bicycle/pedestrian mobility, and improved access to transit Mr. Fregonese reviewed Implementation Strategies, Policy Recommendations + Actions • Draft Zoning & Development Recommendations o Strengthen Economic Opportunity ■ Support unique business clusters such as International District and Health District ■ Major auto sales facilities remain important to the local economy. Pedestrian Activity Zone standard will allow auto sales to continue business as usual o Encourage Sustainable Building Practices ■ Transit and pedestrian -friendly development with less reliance on automobile trips, should be promoted through new design standards ■ Consider requiring electric vehicle charging facilities especially within new residential developments and bicycle facilities ■ Encourage use of solar panels and green building practices o Map of proposed update to Comprehensive Plan designations ■ Health District ■ International District ■ Gateway District o Current Zoning Map ■ The only difference between CG and CG2 is the height limit (CG = 60' and CG2 = 75') Q ■ Many current zones are remnants from the county's antiquated zoning ■ Many zones do not match with the parcel boundaries z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 6, 2017 Page 15 Packet Pg. 641 8.2.a o Proposed Zoning Map ■ The proposal is to change these zones to the consolidated CG zone ■ Incorporate design standards directly into zones to ensure scale transition into neighborhoods ■ More predictable outcomes for community o Comprehensive Plan Map ■ New zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map o Strengthen current design standards ■ Incorporate them directly into the zoning code ■ Consideration of special circumstances within the corridor will be made to ensure the standards are feasible, such as large parcels that would have multiple buildings if redeveloped and parcels with unique access or transportation challenges may require a modified approach to the design standards. o Amenity Space ■ Outdoor amenity space, such as landscaping, benches, etc. should be required in conjunction with development ■ A portion of the required amenity space should be provided as common space and may include pedestrian areas Recommended Front Stepback for Multifamily and Mixed -Use Adjacent to Single Family Zones o UPPER FLOOR SETBACK ■ Zero setback up to 25 feet in height (30 feet is the maximum height in RM 1.5, which is the predominant zone surrounding the commercial zones on Highway 99). ■ 10 foot setback beyond 25 feet in height on sides with lot line adjacency to single family zones L m ■ 20 foot setback beyond 55 feet in height on sides with lot line adjacency to single family zones ■ Stepback areas can be used for active outdoor space such as balconies. N Recommended Transit -Supportive Parking Standards ., o Adjust current minimums; follow market demand for parking c ■ Residential c - Current: Studio: 1.2 / 1-Bedroom: 1.5 / 2-Bedroom: 1.8 / 3-Bedroom: 2 A ■ Recommended for residential portion of development: Minimum average of 0.75 spaces per unit for units 700 sq. ft. or less (and 1.75 spaces for larger units) r� ■ A different ratio may be approved if City determines development is near transit station N or supported by a parking study Draft Affordable Housing Recommendations o Define Hwy 99 area as a "target area" to allow Multi -Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) x projects w ■ Pass ordinance to enable MFTE project in Hwy 99 area ■ All residential -portion of building value tax exempt for 12 years with at least 20% affordable units o Continue or enhance fee waiver program for affordable housing ■ Enhance or enhance City program to allow the reduction of transportation and park impact fees for projects that include affordable housing U o Mixed -Use, Mixed -Income Demonstration Project ■ Identify site with willing owner or City purchase/transferrable option c� ■ Actively recruit developers (non-profit; public -private) ■ Pilot project for new MFTE and fee waiver programs, and other possible special assessment districts Q o Other Affordable Housing and Infrastructure Finance Recommendations ■ Key Financing Tools and Funding Sources to Pursue z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 6, 2017 Page 16 Packet Pg. 642 8.2.a - City Fund for Redevelopment and Affordable Housing - Community Renewal Area (CRA) - used in Shoreline - Hospital Benefit Zone (HBZ) Financing Program - Local Infrastructure Project Area (LIPA) Financing - Landscape Conservation and Local Improvement Program (LCLIP) - Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) - HUD HOME Program - HUD CDBG Program - Enterprise Community Partiers Regional Equitable Development Initiative Draft Signage & Wayfinding Recommendations o Gateway Signage at Hwy 99/Hwy 104 interchange o Transit Gateway Signage/Station at Hwy 99/228th o Improve wayfinding signage along corridor ■ Identify downtown, Lake Ballinger, multiuse path (Interurban Trail), new regional rail, International District, Health District, other activity nodes o Unique District Design Identity ■ Branding, public/local art, street furniture, unique bus shelter designs, pavement patterns, special lighting fixtures, colored crosswalks, banners, etc. o Prohibit new pole signs Draft Transportation Recommendations o Improve Transit Transfers: ■ Unify/consolidate BRT and local transit stops to reduce walking distance for transfers o Hwy 99 and 228th will be Key Intersection ■ 228th will connect Edmonds to regional rail in Mountlake Terrace. ■ Shuttle/transit service from Hwy 99 to regional rail station �? ■ Consolidated transit stop at 228th ■ New BRT station N N ■ Clear signage ■ High quality bike connection on 228th c o Incentivize Alternative Transportation Options: c ■ Car Share/Bike Share ■ On -site bike parking ■ Ride sharing services (Uber, Lyft) ■ Electric car charging stations N ■ Incentives: Impact fee reductions and parking requirement offsets for providing dedicated accommodating alternative transportation options on -site Draft Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations x o Expand use of grant programs to fund safety improvements and pedestrian facilities w ■ Safe Route to School Program ■ Pedestrian and Bicycle Program ■ Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) ■ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ) o Proposed Short & Long -Term Transportation Improvements ■ Transportation Goals: 0 - Improve pedestrian safety and access to/from Hwy 99 corridor - Improve pedestrian environment along Hwy 99 corridor t� - Safe pedestrian crossing of Hwy 99 and access to transit - Improved transit mobility and transit stop environment - Improved traffic flow and general safety with access management Q ■ Key Recommended Transportation Improvements - Close the most significant gap in the pedestrian crossings within the corridor E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q June 6, 2017 Page 17 Packet Pg. 643 8.2.a - 238th to 228th - a distance of 3,700 ft. - has no controlled pedestrian crossing - Improve pedestrian access from the south at the SR 104 interchange - Long-term recommendation: Reconfigure ramps to conventional 90-degree stop control intersections - Short-term recommendation: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) with high visibility crosswalk - Improve connections between transit and major employment centers ➢ Swift Stations at 216th and the Swedish Hospital Campus: Implement a pedestrian walkway system within campus with wayfinding o Maps of Planned Transportation Improvements and Project Supportive Transportation Improvements Mr. Fregonese identified next steps: • Open House for Draft EIS (June 20) • City Council Public Hearing on draft Development Regulations (June 20) • Planning Board Review of Proposed Planned Action Code Language (June 28) • Planning Board public hearing on Planning Action Code Language (July) • City Council review of Planning Board's Recommendation for Planned Action Code Language (July) • City Council to consider adopting: (a) Subarea Plan, (b) Development Code Amendments and (c) Planned Action Ordinance (August) Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if Ms. Hope was able to fix the zoning issue around Safeway including the church next to Safeway. Ms. Hope answered yes, that will be proposed in the plan. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented there was very little vacant property in Edmonds and these sites have enough land to build. N N N Councilmember Johnson relayed her understanding that the Planned EIS would facilitate development proposals within the scope. Ms. Hope answered a Planned Action EIS allows for a planned action option. r_ If the Planned Action EIS has been done, any project that fits the scope does not need to do extra •2 environmental review or an extra SEPA process. That is why two alternatives were considered in the EIS. fit Councilmember Tibbott referred to the two alternatives, no action and the preferred alternative, observing there were three districts as well as a transition between single family such as 3-story apartments as a buffer between 5 over 1. Mr. Fregonese said that was assumed to be the logical development; the problem is those areas have no commercial potential. Councilmember Tibbott asked about design standards for the transition zone between single family and more intensive multi -family. Mr. Fregonese answered the design standards include streetscape standards that do not allow blank walls and require entries, sidewalks, amities, etc. The building step -back is based on building height. Councilmember Tibbott commented the scenario illustrated on the map would not necessarily occur. Mr. 5 Fregonese answered it would not be across the street. Ms. Hope said that scenario was illustrating �j assumptions of build -out; the actual regulations may apply in a different manner. Councilmember Tibbott was unclear whether there was a transition zone between single family and the more intensive multi- v family. Mr. Fregonese displayed the proposed zoning map, pointing out the uses are adjacent. When lots are adjacent to single family, there is a 50-foot setback but that does not apply if the development is across the street. He explained it was not realistic to have mixed use development in all locations and Q would result in more ground floor retail than the market could absorb. It would be logical to have some transition with market buildout. The uses illustrated in the scenarios are permitted under the zoning but it E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q June 6, 2017 Page 18 Packet Pg. 644 8.2.a is not the maximum. Including uses in the EIS that are unlikely to be built adds mitigation to the EIS that will not be realized. The scenario is approximately 2,000 units and 3,000 jobs, a healthy margin for growth that would take some time to absorb and another EIS would not be required until that level was approached. Councilmember Tibbott observed this is a projection rather than illustration of code. Mr. Fregonese said it did not represent a buildout of the code; it was a scenario projection of what was likely in 20 years. Councilmember Tibbott asked how the transition zone would be defined. Mr. Fregonese answered there is no transition zone; the zoning map illustrates mixed use zones adjacent to residential. Ms. Hope pointed out that is the case in some areas currently. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his understanding that theoretically there could be a single-family residence and a 75-foot high building across the street. Mr. Fregonese agreed that was possible. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there would be any step -backs. Mr. Fregonese said yes for a side or rear yard but not across the street. Councilmember Tibbott said he had concerns with that. Councilmember Tibbott asked whether the new design standards would apply to used car lots on Hwy 99 or only to incentivized redevelopment. Mr. Fregonese answered if a car lot was redeveloped, there would be subject to design standards. He offered to provide examples of a car lot in an area like this with a sidewalk and showroom in front and storage in back. The plan ensures car dealers can upgrade and be compatible and still maintain their profitable use. Councilmember Tibbott asked when those improvements would be required. Ms. Hope answered with redevelopment. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there was any incentive for a car lot other than growing their business or redeveloping their property. Mr. Fregonese said in his experience, new car dealers and higher end used car dealers will keep their businesses up-to-date. Often the car dealers have a parking structure for storage in the back and a showroom in front. Councilmember Teitzel commented the vision is great; he was looking forward to a beautiful boulevard N like one might see in France on Hwy 99 with wide sidewalks, outdoor dining, landscaping, etc. However, traffic speeds of 45 mph seem contrary to that vision in terms of pedestrian enjoyment. He asked if there °'' were any plans to work with the State to reduce the speed limit to 35 mph in concert with synchronizing o traffic lights. Mr. Fregonese answered no, it is a State highway and regulations related to speed are quite rigid. Amenity areas go up to the street and between buildings, but realistically a sidewalk cafe was unlikely to be next to the street. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested looking at what Shoreline and Lynnwood have done where sidewalk cafes are inside the developments, not adjacent to Hwy 99. To Councilmember Tibbott's comments about step -backs, her understanding was a building across the street from a residential neighborhood would have a 15-foot setback and then step -backs. Mr. Fregonese said the current regulations did not require that. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested the Council may want to discuss that. Ms. Hope said it was discussed at the Planning Board but they ultimately recognized an extra step -back may not be needed when the width of the street was between the uses. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas agreed with Councilmember Tibbott, having a step -back may be more palatable to the neighborhoods to avoid looking at a huge wall. She was hopeful that would also be addressed by design standards. Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about grandfathering, recalling property owners at the Planning v Board who stated did not want to redevelop. Ms. Hope said property owners can keep their building as they are but when they redevelop or make a significant change, the new standards would apply. There are options included in the proposed plan about how the standards would apply. Mr. Fregonese referred to the Q three levels of flexibility. c m E z V Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q June 6, 2017 Page 19 Packet Pg. 645 8.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out there would still a streetscape in front of the building with trees, and a sidewalk in front of the building. Mr. Fregonese agreed, noting amenity areas are also required in front of the building. 2. REVIEW OF PROPOSED HIGHWAY 99 AREA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Development Services Director Shane Hope explained this is the proposed code to implement the subarea plan. The Planning Board reviewed the code, held a public hearing and provided a recommendation. John Fregonese, Principal, Fregonese Associates, advised the development regulations have also been revised taking into account comments from property owners. He identified parcels on the zoning map proposed to be changed to the consolidated CG zone, commenting the new zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map. He reviewed: • Site development standards General 16.60.020 o The pedestrian area adjacent to the street is composed of three zones: the streetscape zone, the pedestrian zone, and the streetscape zone (Section 16.60.020.C.2) ■ Changed "amenity zone" to "streetscape zone" ■ Added dimensions o Additional building stepback when adjacent to RS zones ■ Upper Stories stepback 10' for 25' of building height; and 20' for 55' of building height • Site development standards — design standards 16.60.030.A. LE o 15' setback with 10' landscape buffer • A minimum five feet wide type IV landscaping is required along all street frontages where parking lots about the street. Section 16.60.030.A.I • Access and vehicle parking o All off-street surface parking shall be located to the side or rear of the primary building, except as otherwise specifically allowed by this chapter, and shall be screened from the sidewalk by a wall or plantings between 2 to 4 feet in height. o Outdoor parking areas shall comprise 40% or less of the public street frontage area within 100 feet of the primary street for the lot or tract and, on corner lots, may not be located at the corner. The requirements of this subsection do not apply to permitted auto sales uses. • Required electric vehicle charging stations (Section 16.60.030.B.5) o One or more electric vehicle charging stations must be provided for all new development that includes housing. • Bicycle storage spaces (Section 16.60.030.B.6) o Bicycle storage spaces for multifamily housing, excluding housing for assisted living or other specialized facilities, shall be provided for residents 0 1 bicycle storage space for each residential unit under 700 square feet and 2 bicycle storage spaces for each residential unit greater than 700 square feet • Paths within parking lots (Section 16.60.030.B.8) o Pedestrian walkways in parking lots shall be delineated by separate paved routes that meet federal accessibility requirements and that use a variation in textures and/or colors and may include landscape barriers and landscape islands • Pedestrian and transit access (Section 16.60.030.B.11) o Where a transit station or bus stop is located in front of or adjacent to a parcel, pedestrian connections linking the station or stop directly to the development are required. o Pedestrians routes shall connect buildings on the same site to each other • Site Development Standards — Site Design and Layout 16.60.030.0 o Alternative Pedestrian Oriented Design (Section 16.60.030.C.1) ■ At least 50% of a building's fagade facing the primary public street shall be located within 20 feet of the property line where the primary street frontage exists. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 6, 2017 Page 20 Packet Pg. 646 8.2.a Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to incentives for smaller units and lower rents for those units and asked how the lower cost could be guaranteed. She asked whether the incentive included putting a cap on the rent. Chair Nordling Rubenkonig relayed the development team indicated there are ways of reducing the cost of the construction. With regard to the Westgate project, it will be subsidized and 19% of the units will be at the affordable housing rate. Vice Chair Monroe recalled the team indicating it was market driven; a certain amount can be charged per square foot for apartments in the area, less square footage equals a lower price. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas concluded the rents would be market rate but lower due to the size. Council President Mesaros asked what the developers of the Westgate characterized as incentives. Vice Chair Monroe said they suggested starting with a 2-story box as the base and then providing items such as public meeting areas, artwork or other features could quality for additional stories. Councilmember Nelson referred to the comment about long term investor and the importance of that distinction. This is the first time the developer has done a project outside of Seattle but they are referencing standard incentives. He wanted to be certain the developer's first project in Snohomish County had Edmonds appeal and not Seattle's. Vice Chair Monroe asked if Councilmember Nelson was interested in ensuing the project was not cookie cutter, commenting the City's Planning Department will work with the development team. At the meeting the Planning Board had, he felt they were very vested in the project and the area. Chair Nordling Rubenkonig said the development team praised City staff for working with them to create a project they are proud of. She noted Edmonds is urban and the Westgate project is similar to projects in Seattle. Councilmember Teitzel said he reads the Planning Board minutes and is impressed with the work they do. 0 He relayed the Council hears from the public at Council meetings, emails, phone calls, etc. and asked how the Planning Board engages with citizens. Chair Nordling Rubenkonig commented the tree ordinance N generated significant public input; there was also a good turnout for the sign code. Planning Board meetings are televised. The Council setup is very formal; the Planning Board is more relaxed. She acknowledged the Planning Board did not have the amount of public participation the members would like. Councilmember o Teitzel commented it would be great to see more people engaged at the Planning Board level before issues come to the City Council. 8. PUBLIC HEARING 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON HIGHWAY 99 AREA-: CG REZONE (MAP) & DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced John Fregonese, Principal, Fregonese Associates, explained tonight's public hearing follows public open houses, news releases, meetings by the Planning Board and City Council and other outreach. He displayed a map of the project area, primarily the commercial zones around Highway 99 in Edmonds. The City Council last discussed Highway 99 Area Zone and Code Changes on June 6: Discussion included: • Comparison with existing zone map and development ode • Review of proposed CG site and building design standards • Question about additional incentives for "green buildings" v • Question about vehicle parking within buildings at street level The focus of tonight's public hearing is the Planning Board's recommendation for Zoning Map and Q Development Code. No action is requested at this time. c m E z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 20, 2017 Page 4 Packet Pg. 647 8.2.a He displayed the proposed Zoning Map and explained the proposal: • Change these zones to the consolidated CG Zone • Incorporate design standards directly into zones to ensure scale transition into neighborhoods • More predicable outcomes for community He displayed the Comprehensive Plan Map, advising the new zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map. He reviewed: • Draft Zoning and Development Recommendations o Strengthen current design standards o Incorporate them directly into the zoning code o Consideration of special circumstances within the corridor will be made to ensure the standards are feasible, such as large parcels that would have multiple buildings if redeveloped and parcels with unique access or transportation challenges. • Site development standards General 16.60.020 o The pedestrian area adjacent to the street is composed of three zones: the streetscape zone, the pedestrian zone, and the streetscape zone (Section 16.60.020.C.2) ■ Changed "amenity zone" to "streetscape zone" ■ Added dimensions o Additional building stepback when adjacent to RS zones ■ Upper stories stepback 10' for 25' of building height; and 20' for 55' of building height • Site development standards —design standards 16.60.030.A. LE 0 15' setback with 10' landscape buffer • A minimum five feet wide type IV landscaping is required along all street frontages where parking lots about the street. Section 16.60.030.A.1 • Access and vehicle parking o All off-street surface parking shall be located to the side or rear of the primary building, except N as otherwise specifically allowed by this chapter, and shall be screened from the sidewalk by a v wall or plantings between 2 to 4 feet in height. M o Outdoor parking areas shall comprise 40% or less of the public street frontage area within 100 c feet of the primary street for the lot or tract and, on corner lots, may not be located at the corner. The requirements of this subsection do not apply to permitted auto sales uses. • Required electric vehicle charging stations (Section 16.60.030.B.5) o One or more electric vehicle charging stations must be provided for all new development that includes housing. N • Bicycle storage spaces (Section 16.60.030.B.6) a o Bicycle storage spaces for multifamily housing, excluding housing for assisted living or other specialized facilities, shall be provided for residents w 0 1 bicycle storage space for each residential unit under 700 square feet and 2 bicycle storage N spaces for each residential unit greater than 700 square feet d • Paths within parking lots (Section 16.60.030.B.8) 0 o Pedestrian walkways in parking lots shall be delineated by separate paved routes that meet federal accessibility requirements and that use a variation in textures and/or colors and may include landscape barriers and landscape islands c • Pedestrian and transit access (Section 16.60.030.B.11) v o Where a transit station or bus stop is located in front of or adjacent to a parcel, pedestrian v connections linking the station or stop directly to the development are required. o Pedestrians routes shall connect buildings on the same site to each other • Site Development Standards — Site Design and Layout 16.60.030.0 Q 1. Pedestrian Oriented Design (Section 16.60.030.C.1) ■ At least 50% of a building's fagade facing the primary public street shall be located within 20 feet of the property line where the primary street frontage exists. z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q June 20, 2017 Page 5 Packet Pg. 648 8.2.a ■ Building must include a prominent pedestrian entry on the primary frontage ■ Vehicle parking shall not be located within the first 20 feet of the primary street frontage, other than as allowed for vehicle sales use. 2. Alternative Walkable Design Area Option ■ For sites with unique constraints. ■ At least 50% of the building's facade facing the primary street shall be located within 60 feet of the front property line 3. Exceptions Process for Pedestrian and Walkable Design Options ■ Exemptions may be allowed by hearing examiner to provide for design flexibility that still encourages pedestrian orientation and efficient land uses under following criteria: - Property is located within 300 feet of highway interchange or has unique pedestrian access constraints - One or more buildings are located facing the primary street frontage - The development provides business and pedestrian areas near the primary street frontage and likely to be active through the day/evening. - At least 25% of required amenity space is located to connect building to the street - Where a site has multiple buildings, amenity space should be located between buildings to allow shared use - One or more buildings on the site must have at least two stories of usable space o Amenity space (Section 16.60.030.C.4) ■ An area equivalent to at least 5% of the building footprint shall be provided as amenity space. �- ■ If a vehicle parking area is being added to the site without the concurrent development of a� a building of at least 2,000 square feet, amenity space must be provided to equal at least m 5% of the additional parking area. ■ Example of amenity space in Costa Mesa, California o Building Design and Massing (Section 16.60.030.D.2) N ■ On the primary frontage, 50% of the building facade between two and 10 feet in height shall be comprised of windows or doors that are transparent Mr. Fregonese reviewed examples of amenity space and building design and massing: • New Seasons building on N Williams Street in Portland • Safeway on Hawthorne Boulevard in Portland • Safeway on Hwy 99Barbur Boulevard in Portland • Fred Meyer on Interstate Avenue, • Auto dealers Mr. Fregonese reviewed photographs illustrating the Health District Gateway and SW 234th today and with corresponding private investment. He reviewed the proposed changes to the sign code • Revisions to 20.65.045: o Limit freestanding signs (such as monument signs) to maximum height of 14 feet in this district o Require freestanding signs to be counted as part of total maximum sign area for this district Mr. Fregonese described next steps: • Council's next meeting on this topic July 18 • Council action scheduled August 15 v Councilmember Teitzel referred to the use of stepbacks to preclude a large wall facing a neighbor, providing a friendly transition. He asked if the use of the stepback would be restricted, for example would decks, tall Q trees, awnings, etc. be allowed, commenting allowing a 20-foot tree in the stepback would defeat the c purpose of the stepback. Mr. Fregonese answered stepbacks are typically used for outdoor areas that would E z M Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 20, 2017 Page 6 Packet Pg. 649 8.2.a include furniture, trees in pots, etc. The intent would be for the stepbacks to be used as outdoor space, an amenity for the building. If desired, tree height could be limited to 10-12 feet. Councilmember Teitzel c concluded there would not be a restriction on what was allowed in the stepback. Mr. Fregonese agreed it isIL typically patio furniture and trees in pots. c M Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the amenity space was private or public. Mr. Fregonese answered it is privately owned intended to be open for public use as part of the pedestrian environment. Ms. Hope :r commented there is also opportunity for an internal plaza or courtyard for the tenants/residents/owners in addition to the required public space that is typically at the sidewalk level. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled at least one project where the interpretation was it was not for the public's use but for the tenants' use. Ms. Hope anticipated it could be a mixture, some public space near the sidewalk as well as some private m space for residents; the mix will depend on the use. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas concluded the plans E for each project would specify whether the space was public or private use. Ms. Hope agreed. o Councilmember Tibbott said he liked the architectural features in the renderings but there is a minimal list a� o of suggested building items. He asked whether more detail, perhaps pictures or illustration to help developers understand what the City is looking for with regard to architectural design standards. Mr. �? Fregonese answered there is typically a brochure or illustrations of how to implement the design standards. Compared to other codes implemented at the staff level, this code has both building transparency and L m building fagade requirements. With creativity, that will lead to the type of buildings in the illustrations. E Quality can never be guaranteed via the code but it can guarantee it won't be a white elephant. Ms. Hope C said the draft code includes some illustrations which maybe supplemented. Typically, commercial projects v include professionals who are used to these design terms, but the intent is for the code to be understandable to the average person. m c� Councilmember Tibbott recalled the Westgate plan included an adaptation of form based code, recalling the intent was to lower the risk to a developer by illustrating what the City was looking for which saves N time for the developer and for the City. Ms. Hope said this is a type of form based code as well, it addresses uses that are allowed/not allowed uses but focuses on the building shape, bulk, glazing, as well as the site R design and building articulation. o .N Councilmember Tibbott recalled he expressed concern during the last presentation about the possibility of a 75-foot building across the street from single family residences. In areas of city where that would be allowed, it may not pencil out but it could happen. If a proposal like that were submitted to the City, he c how it would be handled. Ms. Hope answered the code currently allows a 75-foot height next to single N family housing in some instances with no requirement for stepback or building setback. This code Q- strengthens and respects the neighborhood more than the existing zoning. x w Councilmember Tibbott expressed concern that the proposed zoning eliminates the transition areas. When driving around Shoreline and Edmonds today, he saw taller buildings on Hwy 99 with nearby residential areas. In one location, there was the interurban trail and vegetation between single family and the 75-foot tall building. He appreciated there would be landscaping between the curb and the building, but that does not break up the bulk of the building. He asked what would be done when a use adjacent to another use 3 may not be compatible. Mr. Fregonese answered there would be 15-foot side and rear yards setback in v addition to the stepback. In the case of across the street, there is a 10-20-foot setback in front, the 60-foot >, right-of-way, and the 20-foot single family setback, providing approximately a 100-foot separation between the structures. Although stepback could be required, a 75-foot tall building 100 feet away is beyond the ratio where it would be beneficial. Councilmember Tibbott commented parking would provide additional distance. Q c m E z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q June 20, 2017 Page 7 Packet Pg. 650 8.2.a Councilmember Nelson thanked Mr. Fregonese for the requirement for electrical vehicle charging station and the description of amenity space. He referred to the sample photograph of the car dealership, remarking when he thought of amenity space, he was not thinking it would look like that. Mr. Fregonese recalled the Council's concern with retaining car dealerships. He reviewed the car dealership examples, and the intent to do something useful with the space in front that is not just parking. Councilmember Nelson suggested not using that photograph as an example. Councilmember Nelson asked if the amenity spaces for multiple properties could be combined and collectively create a park. Ms. Hope answered that was possible. Mr. Fregonese said he lives next to a Fred Meyer whose amenity space ended up being a corner park. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Dean Phillips, Council President, Edmonds Lutheran Church, referred to the church's letter expressing support for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. Ann Wermus, Edmonds recognized the work the City has accomplished in the plan for Highway 99. It promises to be a greatly revitalized area. She expressed support for the concept in the plan and stressed the need for continued work on providing permanent low income housing. Under the current plan, if a developer L m took advantage of the tax exemption option, a limited amount of low income housing could be supplied. In E the GMA, the goal is to encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the C population and encourages the use of innovative techniques to meet the housing needs of all economic v segments of the population and requires the city to provide opportunity for a range of housing types. The Highway 99 subarea plan offers a unique opportunity for housing that could be affordable for workforce m housing as well as low income, potentially relieving the pressure on low income families. She urged the Council to develop and employ innovative strategies to promote all efforts as way to increase housing opportunity for all economic segments of the population. N Bea Wilson, Edmonds, representing herself and her son who owns property on 2251 Place SW. She thanked the City Council and Planning Board for the proposed plan. She asked the definition of affordable housing. Mayor Earling suggested she speak with Ms. Hope. Ms. Wilson concluded the plan looks great. Robert Sieu, Edmonds, property owner on Highway 99, said he spoke at the Planning Board May 10 public hearing regarding the exception on design standards. He also spoke with Ms. Hope and the consultant and both agreed some language needed to be change. The Planning Board approved the plan on the condition those changes would be made but at the June 6 Council meeting, the language had not been changed. The changes are related to exceptions for car dealerships and property 300 feet from an interchange. Seth Hale, Seattle, also representing Stan Piha, Edmonds, expressed their support for the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the ordinance as proposed. The consultant has made the appropriate recommendations regarding setbacks, stepbacks and activity zones to ensure protection for properties adjacent to and across from CG zoned parcels within the corridor. Speaking as an architected, he commended the City on the flexibility in the code, providing a unique opportunity for great design in the corridor instead of code driven design. Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, asked about the affect the zoning changes would have on adult entertainment. He recalled a Snohomish County levy in 1995-1999 that did not pass. Q Bruce Witenberg, Edmonds, said the plan works well on Highway 99 frontage where none of the parcels are across street or abut single family residences but more attention needs to be paid to the transition zone. z Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes c� Q June 20, 2017 Page 8 Packet Pg. 651 8.2.a Single family residences in close proximity to the Highway 99 corridor represent some of the least expensive housing in the City. Among the purposes of the CG zone in 16.60.005, it recognizes the evolving identity and sense of place including distinctions between different parts of the district and to be sensitive to adjacent resident zones. He suggested using "adjacent and neighboring" instead of "adjacent" to clarify consideration of residents next to and across the street from CG zones. The table in 16.60.020.A is not sympathetic to adjacent and neighboring residential zones. The minimum street, side and rear setback of 10-15 feet may be more adequately sensitive to neighboring residential zones if each was increased by a minimum of 10 feet. With regard to 16.60.020.D regarding stepbacks adjacent to RS zones, he suggested using "adjacent to and across the street from RS zones" instead of "adjacent." He recommended surface parking lots adjacent to or across the street from residential zones be prohibited and that residential parking requirements in 16.60.030.1 be further reduced from a minimum of .75 cars for units 700 square feet or less and 1.75 cars for units above 750 square feet to encourage use of public transportation. Adopting these recommendations would more clearly demonstrate the Council's commitment to being sensitive to neighboring RS zones while allowing for needed development. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public hearing. He relayed staff is seeking Council input for consideration on July 18. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification whether the zoning change would allow adult entertainment. Ms. Hope answered nothing had changed with regard to adult entertainment. Councilmember Tibbott expressed interest in staff s suggestions to address the issue he raised regarding multi -family directly across street from single family. Admittedly those streets were quieter and there would be parking on the street, yet the possibility existed for a 75-foot tall building across the street. He was open to considering options such as a parking buffer, reduced heights, stepback, etc. Councilmember Johnson commented TOD is very conducive to bicycles. She expressed interest in ways to N accommodate bicycles in the Highway 99 corridor and consider the corridor as whole as a linear park as there are not a lot of parks in the area. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how to ensure people are not parking in the neighborhoods. Although the hope is fewer cars in a TOD, parking could be an issue if residents of the TOD parked in residential neighborhoods adjacent to the corridor. Ms. Hope said that is a legitimate issue and it is a balancing act. If too much parking is required, the result will not be TOD, yet enough parking needs to be required. The code tries to strike that balance between what is enough so there is some required parking but not so much that the TOD is lost or development of the site is so expensive that nothing happens. She described a development in Redmond where initially the city had fairly hefty parking standards and after the project was built, they found only about half the parking was being used because residents were using transit due to the location. If the need arose, parking programs could be considered. 9. ACTION ITEMS 1. PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE Public Works Director Phil Williams explained this is in response to the current need which will continue so staff is recommending a change to the code. He reviewed: v • Current Noise Ordinance ECC 5.30 o Written 1981 — last modified 1985 (32 years ago) o Sets standards for noise generation by limiting sound pressure levels at receiving property lines Q o Establishes two standards ■ Daytime (7 am— 10 pm) m ■ Night time (10 pm — 7 am) E z c� Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q June 20, 2017 Page 9 Packet Pg. 652 M *TO rr *TO 8.2.c Chapter 16.60 DRAFT: 7/12/17 CG — GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE Sections: 16.60.000 CG zone. 16.60.005 Purposes. 16.60.010 Uses. 16.60.015 Location standards for sexually oriented businesses. 16.60.020 Site development standards — General. 16.60.030 Site development standards — Design. 16.60.040 Operating restrictions. 16.60.000 CG zone. A. This chapter establishes the general commercial zoning district. B. Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply. 1. Amenity space: outdoor space for uses that are considered to provide an amenity or benefit to people 2. Auto sales use: facilities for the commercial sale of motor vehicles, including buildings and areas typically associated with auto sales use, such as areas for the display and storage of automobiles that are sold or serviced as part of the overall auto sales use. 3. Frontage: the front part of a property or building adjacent to a street @ 4. Primary frontage (or "primary street frontage"): the frontage for a property that is adjacent to only one street or, for a property that is adjacent to more than one street, the frontage that is N adjacent to the street that is considered primary over any other streets to which the property is N adjacent. ti 5. Stepback: The upper portion of a building that is required to be set (or stepped) further back than the minimum setback otherwise required by ECDC 16.60.020.A. ti C. Where this chapter conflicts with any other, this chapter shall prevail for the general commercial L district. o 16.60.005 Purposes. The CG zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones listed in Chapter 16.40 ECDC: A. Encourage economic vitality through businesses, investment, redevelopment, and efficient use of land; B. Encourage safe and comfortable access for pedestrians, transit, and motorists; a C. Encourage attractive mixed use development, affordable housing, and a variety of commercial uses; c m and E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 1 Packet Pg. 656 8.2.c D. Recognize the district's evolving identity and sense of place, including distinctions between different parts of the district, and be sensitive to adjacent residential zones. 16.60.010 Uses. A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. All permitted or conditional uses in any other zone in this title, except as specifically prohibited by subsection (C) of this section or limited by subsections (B) and (D) of this section; 2. Halfway houses; 3. Sexually oriented businesses, which shall comply with the location standards set forth in ECDC 16.60.015, the development regulations set forth in Chapter 17.50 ECDC, and the licensing regulations set forth in Chapter 4.52 ECC. B. Permitted Secondary Uses. 1. Off street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use. 2. Indoor storage facilities that either comprise less than 40% of a permitted primary use of the building in which they are located or are in a separate accessory building or buildings comprising less than 40% of the total leasable building space used for the parcel's permitted primary use(s). 3. Outdoor storage areas that are integral to a permitted primary use, such as storage or display areas for automobile sales, building materials or building supply sales, or garden/nursery sales, provided that such outdoor uses are screened from adjacent residential zoning districts. C. Prohibited Uses. 1. Mobile home parks. 2. Storage facilities or outdoor storage areas intended as a primary use, not secondary to a permitted use. Automobile wrecking yards, junk yards, or businesses primarily devoted to storage or mini storage are examples of this type of prohibited use. D. Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC. [Ord. 3981 § 1 (Att. A), 2014; Ord. 3635 § 1, 2007]. N N N. 16.60.015 Location standards for sexually oriented businesses: All sexually oriented businesses shall LJ comply with the requirements of this section, the development regulations set forth in Chapter 17.50 L ECDC, and Chapter 4.52 ECC. The standards established in this section shall not be construed to restrict or prohibit the following activities or products: (1) expressive dance; (2) plays, operas, musicals, or other 0 dramatic works; (3) classes, seminars, or lectures conducted for a scientific or educational purpose; (4) v printed materials or visual representations intended for educational or scientific purposes; (5) nudity within a locker room or other similar facility used for changing clothing in connection with athletic or exercise activities; (6) nudity within a hospital, clinic, or other similar medical facility for health -related a purposes; and (7) all movies and videos that are rated G, PG, PG13, R, and NC17 by the Motion Picture Association of America. E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 2 Packet Pg. 657 8.2.c A. Separation Requirements. A sexually oriented business shall only be allowed to locate where specifically permitted and only if the following separation requirements are met: 1. No sexually oriented business shall be located closer than 300 feet to any of the following protected zones, whether such protected zone is located within or outside the city limits: a. A residential zone as defined in Chapter 16.10 ECDC; b. A public use zone as defined in Chapter 16.80 ECDC. 2. No sexually oriented business shall be located closer than 300 feet to any of the following protected uses, whether such protected use is located within or outside the city limits: a. A public park; b. A public library; c. A nursery school or preschool; d. A public or private primary or secondary school; e. A church, temple, mosque, synagogue, or other similar facility used primarily for religious worship; f. A community center such as an amusement park, public swimming pool, public playground, or other facility of similar size and scope used primarily by children and families for recreational or entertainment purposes; g. A permitted residential use located in a commercial zone; h. A museum; and i. A public hospital or hospital district. No sexually oriented business shall be located closer than 500 feet to any bar or tavern within or outside the city limits. B. Measurement. The separation requirements shall be measured by following a straight line from the nearest boundary line of a protected zone specified in subsection (A) of this section or nearest physical point of the structure housing a protected use specified in subsection (A) of this section to the nearest physical point of the tenant space occupied by a sexually oriented business. C. Variance from Separation Requirements. Variances may be granted from the separation requirements in subsection (A) of this section if the applicant demonstrates that the following criteria are met: 1. The natural physical features of the land would result in an effective separation between the proposed sexually oriented business and the protected zone or use in terms of visibility and access; The proposed sexually oriented business complies with the goals and policies of the community development code; 3. The proposed sexually oriented business is otherwise compatible with adjacent and surrounding land uses; 4. There is a lack of alternative locations for the proposed sexually oriented business; and N N N a r c m E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 3 Packet Pg. 658 8.2.c 5. The applicant has proposed conditions which would minimize the adverse secondary effects of the proposed sexually oriented business. D. Application of Separation Requirements to Existing Sexually Oriented Businesses. The separation requirements of this section shall not apply to a sexually oriented business once it has located within the city in accordance with the requirements of this section. [Ord. 3981 § 1 (Att. A), 2014; Ord. 3635 § 1, 2007]. 16.60.020 Site development standards — General. A. Table. Except as hereinafter provided, development requirements shall be as follows: Dimensional Requirements Table Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Street Setback Minimum Side/Rear Setback Maximum Height Maximum Floor Area CG None None 5'/10" 0/15 ' 75" None 1 Fifteen feet from all lot lines adjacent to RM or IRS zoned property; otherwise no setback is required by this subsection.. 2 The 5' minimum width applies only to permitted outdoor auto sales use; otherwise the minimum is 10'. s None for structures located within an area designated as a high-rise node on the comprehensive plan map. B. Maximum height for purposes of this chapter need not include railings, chimneys, mechanical equipment or other exterior building appurtenances that do not provide interior livable space. In no case shall building appurtenances together comprise more than 20 percent of the building surface area above the maximum height. C. Pedestrian area. 1. For purposes of this chapter, the pedestrian area described herein is the area adjacent to the m c street that encompasses the public right of way from the edge of the curb (or, if no curb, from c� the edge of pavement) and the street setback area, as identified in Table A of this section. N 2. The pedestrian area is composed of three zones: the activity zone, the pedestrian zone, and N the streetscape zone. Providing improvements to the pedestrian area, as needed to be ti consistent with this subsection on at least the primary street, is required as part of development N projects, excluding development that would not add a new building or that consists of building improvements that do not add floor area equaling more than 10% of the building's existing floor area or that consists of additional parking stalls that comprise less than 10% of the existing o parking stalls or that consists of development otherwise exempted under this chapter. a. Activity Zone. The activity zone shall be the open-air pedestrian area from the o building front to the edge of the pedestrian zone. The activity zone is the section of the 0 pedestrian area that is reserved for activities that commonly occur immediately v adjacent to the building facade. Typical amenities or activities included in the activity zone include, but are not limited to, sidewalks, benches, potted plants, outdoor dining a and shopping. The area shall be paved to connect with the pedestrian zone in an ADA- r accessible manner. Stairs, stoops and raised decks or porches may be constructed in a m portion of the activity zone. t U r a 2017.05.05 Page 4 Packet Pg. 659 8.2.c b. Pedestrian Zone. The pedestrian zone is located between the activity zone and the streetscape zone. The pedestrian zone consists of a minimum 5-foot clear and unobstructed path for safe and efficient through -traffic for pedestrians. Architectural projections and outdoor dining may be permitted to encroach into the pedestrian zone only where a minimum 5-foot clear path and 7-foot vertical clearance is maintained within the pedestrian zone. c. Streetscape Zone. The streetscape zone is located between the curb or pavement edge to the edge of the pedestrian zone and shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide. The streetscape zone is the section that is reserved for pedestrian use and for amenities and facilities that commonly occur between the adjacent curb or pavement edge and pedestrian through -traffic. Typical amenities and facilities in the streetscape zone include, but are not limited to, street trees, street lights, benches, bus stops, and bike racks. Street trees shall be required in conformance with the Edmonds Street Tree Plan. 0) � n3 U t!1 i a n a a, > a vi N CL N Q N At— 5' min. 4e 5'-10'+'le 181'-24-e- Note: Numerical Ranges for the Pedestrian Zone and the Activity Zone are typical but do not control over other requirements of this chapter. (Illustration: Pedestrian Area) B. Building stepback when adjacent to RS Zones N N N ti N_ ti a L N i� U �i H a r c m E M U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 5 Packet Pg. 660 8.2.c 1. The portion of the buildings above 25 feet in height shall step back no less than 10 feet from the required setback to an adjacent IRS zone. That portion of the building over 55 feet in height shall be step back no less than 20 feet from the required setback to an adjacent IRS Zone. 2. Balconies, railings, parapets and similar features that do not enclose an interior space may extend into the stepback area in order to encourage more human activity and architectural features. Freight Limid 74 I I I I I I Q I I is I I I I 5 I � I I a I 4 Q I I I 10 3 I 2 I 1 I S' Wback with 10' landscape buffer (Illustration: Setbackand "Stepback" of building adjacent to IRS Zones) 16.60.030 Site development standards — Design. Design review by the architectural design board is required for any project that includes buildings exceeding 75 feet in height as identified in ECDC 16.70.020. Projects not exceeding this height may be reviewed by staff as a Type I decision. Regardless of what review process is required, all projects proposed in the CG zone must meet the design standards contained in this section. A. Screening and Buffering. 1. General. a. Retaining walls facing adjacent property or public rights of way shall not exceed 7 feet in height. A minimum of 4 feet of planted terrace is required between stepped wall segments. b. Tree landscaping may be clustered to soften the view of a building or parking lot, yet allow visibility to signage and building entry. c. Stormwater facilities shall be designed to minimize visual impacts and integrate landscaping into the design. d. All parking lots are required to provide Type V interior landscaping, consistent with N N ti N ti ca 0 �L 0 U C�i t— a c am E t r a 2017.05.05 Page 6 Packet Pg. 661 8.2.c Chapter 20.13 ECDC e. Type I landscaping is required for commercial, institutional and medical uses adjacent to single family or multifamily zones. The buffer shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width and continuous in length. f. Type I landscaping is required for residential parking areas adjacent to single family zones. The buffer shall be a minimum of 4 feet in width and continuous in length. g. Type I landscaping is required for commercial and multifamily uses adjacent to single family zones. The buffer shall be a minimum of four feet in width and 10 feet in height and continuous in length. h. If there is a loading zone and/or trash compactor area next to a single family or multifamily zone, there shall be a minimum of a six -foot -high masonry wall plus a minimum width of 5 feet of Type I landscaping. Trash and utility storage elements shall not be permitted to encroach within street setbacks or within setbacks adjacent to single family zones. Mechanical equipment, including heat pumps and other mechanical elements, shall not be placed in the setbacks. i. Landscape buffers, Type I, shall be used along the edge of parking areas adjacent to single family zones. j. Outdoor storage areas for commercial uses must be screened from adjacent IRS zones. 2. Parking Lots Abutting Streets. a. Type IV landscaping, minimum 5 feet wide, is required along all street frontages where parking lots, excluding for auto sales use, abut the street right-of-way. b. For parking lots where auto sales uses are located, the minimum setback area must be landscaped to include a combination of vegetation and paved pedestrian areas. c. All parking located under the building shall be completely screened from the public street by one of the following methods: i. Walls that have architectural treatment meeting at least three of the elements listed in ECDC 16.60.030.D.2.e; ii. Type III planting and a grill that is 25 percent opaque; or iii. Grill work that is at least 80 percent opaque. B. Parking, Access, and Bicycle Storage Standards. 1. Parking requirements. Parking shall be provided as follows: a. Nonresidential uses, one space per 500 square feet of leasable building space; and b. Residential uses, an average of 0.75 space per unit that is less than 700 square feet, an average of 1.25 parking spaces per unit that is between 700 and 1,100 square feet, and otherwise 1.75 spaces per unit. c. In addition, guest parking for residential uses at a minimum ratio of one guest space for every twenty required parking spaces. d. For mixed use development, a portion of the parking spaces may be shared between residential and commercial uses provided the director finds that the proposal is supported by a parking study and/or nationally recognized parking standards and that the site plan assures access for all shared parking uses. e. Parking meeting the non-residential parking requirements shall be open to the public throughout business operating hours. N N a r c m E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 7 Packet Pg. 662 8.2.c The first 3,000 square feet of commercial space in a mixed -use development with a shared parking plan is exempt from off street parking requirements. The development services director may approve a different ratio for the parking standards of this section when an applicant submits parking data illustrating that the standards do not accurately apply to a specific development. The data submitted for an alternative parking ratio shall include, at a minimum, the size and type of the proposed development, and the anticipated peak and average parking loads of all uses. The director may approve a parking ratio that is based on the specific type of development and its primary users in relationship to: a. An analysis conducted using nationally recognized standards or methodology, such as is contained in the Urban Land Institute's most recent version of the publication "Shared Parking" or the latest version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication "Parking Generation"; or b. A site -specific parking study that includes data and analysis for one or more of the following: i. 1/4 mile proximity to a bus rapid transit station and methodology that takes into account transit -oriented development; ii. Use of transportation demand management policies, including but not limited to free or subsidized transit passes for residents and workers; iii. On -site car -share and bike share facilities: or iv. Uses that serve patients, clients, or tenants who do not have the same vehicle parking needs as the general population. 4. All off-street surface parking shall be located to the side or rear of the primary building, except as otherwise allowed by this chapter, and shall be screened from the sidewalk by a wall or plantings between 2 to 4 feet in height. Outdoor parking areas shall comprise 40% or less of the public street frontagearea within 100 feet of the primary street for the lot or tract and, on corner lots, may not be located at the corner. The requirements of this subsection do not apply to permitted auto sales uses. 5. Electric vehicle charging stations: One or more electric vehicle charging stations must be provided for all new development that includes housing. The number of required charging N stations shall be 1 for every 10 required residential parking stalls, plus either additional stations N or planned capacity (or a combination thereof) that could double the amount of initially ti required stations. For this section, "planned capacity" means site design and construction that N includes electrical wiring connection and ventilation, compliant with the City's building codes, to support potential or actual future electric vehicle charging stations. 6. Bicycle storage spaces: Bicycle storage spaces for multifamily housing, excluding housing for Z assisted living or other specialized facilities where the development services director finds that the targeted population is not likely to use bicycles, shall be provided for residents at a ratio of 1 0 bicycle storage space for each residential unit under 700 square feet and 2 bicycle storage c9 spaces for each residential unit greater than 700 square feet. Bicycle storage spaces shall v consist of storage racks, lockers, or other secure space to provide sheltered, safe, and convenient bicycle storage for building residents. Such space may be in a vehicle parking garage a or another appropriate location but shall not be provided as open storage on a deck or balcony. r c m E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 8 Packet Pg. 663 8.2.c 7. Driveways accessing Highway 99: All driveway connections to Highway 99 must meet the applicable requirements of the Washington State Department of Transportation, including minimum requirements for distance between driveway access connections, which may be up to 250 feet to help promote traffic safety and minimize pedestrian -vehicle conflicts. 8. Paths within Parking Lots. a. Pedestrian paths in parking lots shall be delineated by separate paved routes that meet federal accessibility requirements and that use a variation in textures and/or colors and may include landscape barriers and landscape islands. b. Pedestrian paths shall be provided at least every 180 feet within parking lots. These shall be designed to provide access to onsite buildings as well as to pedestrian walkways that border the development. c. Pedestrian paths shall be a minimum of six feet in width and shall be separated from the parking area either horizontally or vertically (e.g. with curbs). Where paths cross vehicular lanes, raised traffic tables should be considered if feasible. d. Parking lots shall have pedestrian connections to the main sidewalk at a minimum of every 100 feet. 9. Bonus for Parking Below or Above Ground Floor. For projects where at least 50 percent of the parking is below or above the ground floor of the building, the following standards may be applied regardless of any ECDC standards that otherwise conflict: i. The minimum drive aisle width may be reduced to 22 feet. ii. The maximum ramp slope may be increased to 20 percent. iii. A mixture of full and reduced width parking stalls may be provided without demonstrating the stalls could also be provided at full width dimensions. 10. Drive —through facilities. Drive -through facilities such as, but not limited to, banks, cleaners, fast food, drug stores, and espresso stands, shall comply with the following: a. Drive -through windows and stacking lanes shall not be located along the facades of the building that face a street. N b. No more than one direct entrance or exit from the drive -through shall be allowed as a separate curb cut onto an adjoining street. 11. Pedestrian and Transit Access. a. Pedestrian building entries must connect directly to the public sidewalk and to adjacent developments if feasible. N b. Internal pedestrian routes shall extend to the property line and connect to existing o pedestrian routes where applicable. Potential future connections shall also be 0 U identified such that pedestrian access between developments can occur without C�i walking in the parking or access areas. F_: c. Where a transit station or bus stop is located in front of or adjacent to a parcel, a pedestrian connections linking the station or stop directly to the development are required. m d. Pedestrian routes shall connect buildings on the same site to each other. r a 2017.05.05 Page 9 Packet Pg. 664 8.2.c C. Site Design and Layout: Overall, the design and use of each site shall be based on the building/street relationship and on the integration of pedestrian features. This will take the form of either a Pedestrian Oriented Design Area or an Alternative Walkable Design Area, as described below in subsections 1 and 2 of this section, provided that an exceptions process, pursuant to Subsection 3 below, may be allowed under the provisions of this section. Additional site design and layout standards in this section must also be met. 1. Pedestrian Oriented Design Area: Unless otherwise permitted under subsections 2 or 3 of this section, development must meet the requirements of this subsection for a pedestrian -oriented design area. a. Primary Frontage. At least 50% of a building's facade facing the primary public street shall be located within 20 feet of the property line where the primary street frontage exists. The illustration below provides an example of this concept. The requirement does not apply to buildings that are behind another building on the same lot when the other building has a footprint of at least 3000 square feet and has met the requirement. Where site constraints preclude strict compliance with the requirement, the building line shall be measured one foot behind the line created by that constraint. On a corner lot or a lot with frontages on multiple streets, the development services director shall determine the primary street frontage considering the following: i. The street classification of the adjacent streets; ii. The prevailing orientation of other buildings in the area; iii. The length of the block face on which the building is located; or iv. Unique characteristics of the lot or street. The building must include a prominent pedestrian entry on the primary frontage. Vehicle parking, other than where permitted for vehicle sales use, shall not be located within the first 20 feet of the primary street frontage. The first 20 feet of the primary street frontage may include building space, landscaping, artwork, seating areas, outdoor displays, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. N N 04 2. Alternative Walkable Design Area Option: An alternative to the pedestrian -oriented design area requirements of subsection 1 in this section may be allowed by the development services director only for sites that the director has found to have unique and significant constraints a related to pedestrian access and for which a phased design plan to increase pedestrian access and connectivity has been submitted to the development services department. While they E currently may be largely auto -oriented, Walkable Design Areas have a high potential for walking, t U r a 2017.05.05 Page 10 Packet Pg. 665 8.2.c bicycling and transit service. If a development is allowed to use this standard, it shall be subject to the requirements of this subsection. 0 Building Placement: For any new building permitted on a property after August 1, 2017, a minimum of 50% of the building's fagade facing the primary street shall be located within 60 feet of the front property line or within 65 feet where a 5-foot landscaping area is provided between the parking lot and the sidewalk. When site constraints preclude strict compliance with this requirement, the building line shall be measured one foot behind the line created by that constraint. On a corner lot or a lot with frontages on multiple streets, the development services director shall determine the primary street frontage considering the following: i. The street classification of the adjacent streets; ii. The prevailing orientation of other buildings in thearea; iii. The length of the block face on which the building is located; iv. The location of any alley or parking areas; or V. Unique characteristics of the lot or street. No more than one double —sided row of parking spaces shall be allowed in the front of a building on its primary frontage. A pedestrian entrance must be located on the primary frontage. Building facade facing primary street shall be Pedestrian entrance located within 60 feet of the front properly fine i Primary street frontage e. Required Amenity spaces, under subsection 4 below, shall be located to connect the building to the street as much as practicable, provided that amenity space may also be located between buildings where the space will be used in common. 3. Exceptions Process for Pedestrian or Walkable Design: An exception to the exact requirements of subsections 1 or 2 of this section may be allowed by the hearing examiner under a Type IIIA decision process to provide for design flexibility that still encourages pedestrian orientation and efficient land uses when the following criteria are met: a. The property is located within 300 feet of a highway interchange and has unique pedestrian access constraints or is primarily used for motor vehicle sales; N N N t— a r c am E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 11 Packet Pg. 666 8.2.c b. The development provides business and pedestrian areas that are near the primary street frontage and likely to be active throughout the day and evening; c. The development features a prominent building entry for pedestrian use that is highly visible and connected by a well -lit walkway from the primary street frontage; d. At least 25% of the required amenity space shall be located to connect the building to the street in a manner that encourages pedestrian use and include seating, landscaping, and artwork e. Where a site has multiple buildings (excluding accessory utility buildings), 50% or more of the required amenity space shall be located between buildings to allow for shared use. f. No more than 50% of vehicle parking, other than that associated with a permitted vehicle sales facility use, may be located within 20 feet of the front property line. g. One or more buildings on the site must have at least two stories of useable space. 4. Amenity space. Amenity space is intended to provide residents, employees, and visitors with places for a variety of outdoor activities. a. An area equivalent to at least 5% of the building footprint shall be provided as amenity space. If a vehicle parking area is being added to U the site without the concurrent development of a building of at least ra 2,000 square feet, amenity space must be provided to equal at least 5% of the additional parking area. E b. The amenity space shall be outdoor space that incorporates pedestrian- c oriented features, such as, but not limited to, seating, paths, gazebos, v dining tables, pedestrian -scale lighting, and artwork. A minimum of 10% of the required amenity space shall be comprised of plantings, which may include tree canopy areas and other shade or screening features. Native vegetation is encouraged. N N c. The majority of the required amenity space must be provided in one or N more of the following forms: ti Recreation areas: an open space available for recreation. The area may be spatially defined by landscaping rather than building frontages. Its surface shall consist primarily of hardy groundcover or a material conducive to playground or o recreational use. Decorative landscape features, such as flower L beds, shall not comprise more than 15% of the total area. N_ Plazas: an open space available for community gathering and 0 commercial activities. A plaza shall be spatially defined primarily v by either building facades, with strong connections to interior C�i uses, or close proximity to the public sidewalk, especially at the F_: intersection of streets. Its surface shall be primarily hardscape, a provided that trees, shade canopies, and other landscaping, as m well as water features and artwork, may add visual or E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 12 Packet Pg. 667 8.2.c environmental features to the space. iii. Squares or courtyards: an open space available for unstructured recreation or community gathering purposes. A square is spatially defined by building facades with strong connections to interior uses. Its surface shall be primarily hardscape, supplemented by trees and other landscaping. Water features and artwork are optional. iv. Exception: A community garden may comprise a portion of any amenity space, provided that it: 1) is located more than 20 feet from a primary street frontage; 2) is dedicated to ongoing use by residents of the site, including for growing edible produce; and 3) includes facilities for watering the garden and storing garden supplies. 5. Lighting: All lighting shall be shielded and directed downward and away from adjacent parcels. This may be achieved through lower poles at the property lines and/or full "cut off" fixtures. a. Parking lots shall have lighting poles that are a maximum of 25 feet in height. Pedestrian paths or walkways and outdoor steps shall have pedestrian -scaled lighting focused on the travel path. Pole height shall be a maximum of 14 feet, although lighting bollards are preferred. b. For pedestrian paths and walkways on internal portions of the site, solar -powered lighting may be sufficient. c. Entries shall have lighting for safety and visibility integrated with the building/canopy. D. Building Design Standards 1. General. To provide variety and interest in appearance, the following design elements should be considered, and a project shall demonstrate how at least four of the elements will be used to vary the design of the site: a. Building massing and unit layout, b. Placement of structures and setbacks, c. Location of pedestrian and vehicular facilities, d. Composition and character of open space, plant materials and street trees, e. Variety in architectural elements, fagade articulation, and/or building materials, f. Roof variation in slope, height and/or materials. 2. Building Design and Massing. a. Buildings shall convey a visually distinct "base" and "top, which may be achieved through differences in massing elements and/or architectural details. b. The bulk and scale of buildings of over 3,000 square feet in footprint shall be r a 2017.05.05 Page 13 Packet Pg. 668 8.2.c mitigated through the use of massing and design elements such as facade articulation and modulation, setbacks, step -backs, distinctive roof lines or forms, and other design details. Primary Frontage: On the primary frontage, to provide visual connection between activities inside and outside the building, 50% of the building facade between 2 and 10 feet in height, as measured from the adjacent sidewalk, shall be comprised of ■ 50% Min Transparency (may indude all Windows and glass doors, but not mirrored finishes) windows or doors that are transparent, the bottom of which may not be more than 4 feet above the adjacent sidewalk. A departure from this standard may be approved when the facade will not be visible from the public street due to the placement of other buildings on the site, provided that the requirements of subsection "e " in this section shall apply. d. All Other Building Frontages: All street -facing facades within 30 feet of a public street, other than for the primary frontage or those facing an alley or the last block of a dead-end street, shall comply with the standard below. i. Thirty percent (30%) of the building facade between 2 and 10 feet in height shall be made of windows or doors that are transparent, the bottom of which may not be more than four feet above the adjacent sidewalk. Windows shall not be mirrored or have glass tinted darker than 40% in order to meet this requirement. e. Wall treatment: Building facades not subject to all requirements of ECDC 16.60.030.D.2.c or ECDC 16.60.030.D.2.d are intended to not display blank, unattractive walls to the public or to other building tenants. To accomplish this, walls greater than 30 feet in length shall have architectural treatment that incorporates at least four of the following elements into the design of the facade: i. Masonry (except for flat concrete block). ii. Concrete or masonry plinth at the base of the wall. iii. Belt courses of a different texture and color. iv. Projecting cornice. V. Projecting metal or wood canopy. vi. Decorative tilework. vii. Trellis containing planting. viii. Medallions. ix. Artwork or wall graphics. X. Vertical differentiation. N N N. Q r c m E t U 2 r a 2017.05.05 Page 14 Packet Pg. 669 8.2.c xi. Decorative lighting fixtures. xii. Glazing xiii. An architectural element not listed above that is approved by the director to meet the intent of this subsection. 16.60.040 Operating restrictions. A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed building, except the following: 1. Public utilities; 2. Off street parking and loading areas; 3. Drive-in business; 4. Secondary uses permitted under ECDC 16.60.010(B); 5. Limited outdoor display of merchandise meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.65 ECDC; 6. Public markets; provided, that when located next to a single family residential zone, the market shall be entirely within a completely enclosed building; 7. Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC; 8. Motorized and nonmotorized mobile vending units meeting the criteria of Chapter 4.12 ECC B. Interim Use Status— Public Markets. 1. Unless a public market is identified on a business license as a year-round market within the city of Edmonds, a premise licensed as a public market shall be considered a temporary use. As a temporary activity, any signs or structures used in accordance with the market do not require design review. When a location is utilized for a business use in addition to a public market, the public market use shall not decrease the required available parking for the other business use below the standards established in this chapter. C. Ongoing Uses. 1. Audio equipment at drive -through facilities shall not be audible off site. 2. Development subject to the standards of this chapter shall continue to meet the standards of this chapter except as specifically permitted otherwise. r a 2017.05.05 Page 15 Packet Pg. 670 8.2.c 20.60.045 Freestanding signs — Regulations. A. Regulation. Permanent freestanding signs are discouraged. Freestanding signs shall be approved only where the applicant demonstrates by substantial evidence that there are no reasonable and feasible alternative signage methods to provide for adequate identification and/or advertisement. B. Maximum Area. The maximum area of a freestanding sign shall be as follows: Zone Maximum Area of Sign RS, RM 10 square feet (subdivision, PRD, multifamily) 4 square feet (individual residence sign BN, BP 24 square feet (single) 48 square feet (group) BC, BD, WMU, FVMU 32 square feet (single) 48 square feet (group) CW 32 square feet (single) 48 square feet (group) CG Sign area shall be governed by subsection (C) of this section C. Allowable Sign Area for Freestanding Signs — CG Zone. The total allowable sign area for freestanding signs on general commercial sites shall be 56 square feet or one-half square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of street frontage, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of 160 square feet of freestanding sign area. Freestanding signs count against the overall allowable permanent sign area. Multiple business or tenant sites shall further be allowed an additional 24 square feet of freestanding sign area for each commercial tenant or ` Formatted: Header Formatted: Footer M H Page 1 Q E M u M 41 a Packet Pg. 671 8.2.c occupant in excess of one up to a maximum sign area of 160 square feet. Corner lots choosing to accumulate sign area under the provisions of subsection (E) of this section shall be limited to 160 square feet. D. Maximum Height. The maximum sign height of freestanding signs shall be as follows: Maximum Height of Zone Sign RS, RM 16 feet BN, BP, BC, BD, CG, CW, 114 feet WMU, FVMU Page 2 Formatted: Header Deleted: CG Formatted Table Deleted: 25 feet Formatted: Footer Packet Pg. 672 8.2.d COMPARISON TABLES Draft CG Regulations 16.60.020 Site development standards — General. Dimensional Requirements Table Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Street Setback Minimum Side/Rear Setback Maximum Height Maximum Floor Area CG None None 5'/10" 0/151 75" None A. Table. Except as hereinafter provided, development requirements shall be as follows: 1 Fifteen feet from all lot lines adjacent to RM or RS zoned property; otherwise no setback is required by this subsection.. 2 The 5' minimum width applies only to permitted outdoor auto sales use; otherwise the minimum is 10'. 3 None for structures located within an area designated as a high-rise node on the comprehensive plan map. Existing Regulations 16.60.020 Site development standards — General. A. Table. Except as hereinafter provided, development requirements shall be as follows: Minimum Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Minimum Side/Rear Maximum Maximum Area Width Street Setback Setback Height Floor Area CG None None 412 None' 60" None CG2 None None 412 None' 7513 None 1 Fifteen feet from all lot lines adjacent to RM or RS zoned property regardless of the setback provisions established by any other provision of this code. z Street setback area shall be fully landscaped. 3 None for structures located within an area designated as a high-rise node on the comprehensive plan map. Fit liET41: 11 Ti1 ► K,I r Q Packet Pg. 673 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, establishing a Planned Action for the Highway 99 Subarea, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and implementing rules provide for the integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through designation of Planned Actions by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act "GMA); and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations providing for planned actions; WHEREAS, the City has prepared a subarea plan and development regulations for the Highway 99 Subarea; and WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects whose impacts have been previously addressed in a Planned Action environmental impact statement (EIS), and thereby encourages desired growth and r N economic development; and CN WHEREAS, the Highway 99 Planned Action EIS identifies impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in the subarea; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations which will help protect the environment, and is adopting zoning regulations specific to the sub -area which will guide the amount, location, form, and quality of desired development; WHEREAS, the Highway 99 Subarea is deemed to be appropriate for designation of a Planned Action; WHEREAS, the Edmonds Planning Board held an open record public hearing on May 10, 2017 to consider Highway 99 Subarea development regulations and on July 12, 2017 to consider the proposed planned action ordinance; WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council held an open record public hearing on June 20, 2017 to consider Highway 99 Subarea development regulations and on August 1, 2017, to consider the proposed planned action ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are hereby adopted and incorporated = by reference. The City Council bases its findings and conclusions on the entire record of testimony and exhibits, including all written and oral testimony before the Planning Board and City Council. Q SECTION 2. Purpose. The City Council declares that the purpose of this ordinance is to: E z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 2 r Packet Pg. 674 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT A. Combine analysis of environmental impacts with the City's development of plans and regulations; B. Designate the Highway 99 Subarea as a Planned Action for purposes of environmental review and permitting of subsequent, implementing projects pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.031; C. Determine that the EIS prepared for the sub -area plan meets the requirements of a Planned Action EIS pursuant to SEPA; D. Establish criteria and procedures, consistent with state law, that will determine whether subsequent, implementing projects qualify as Planned Actions; E. Provide the public with information about planned actions and how the City will process applications for implementing projects; F. Streamline and expedite the land use review and approval process for qualifying projects by relying on the EIS completed for the Planned Action; and G. Apply the City's development regulations together with the mitigation measures described in the Planned Action EIS and this Ordinance to address the impacts of future c� development contemplated by the Planned Action. CN N SECTION 3. Findings. The City Council finds as follows: N. A. The City is subject to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, and is located within an Urban Growth Area; B. The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and is amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a subarea element specific to the Highway 99 Subarea; C. The City is adopting development regulations to implement the Highway 99 Subarea Plan to implement said Plan; D. The City has prepared an EIS for the Highway 99 subarea (Planned Action EIS) and finds that this EIS adequately addresses the probable significant environmental impacts associated with the type and amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned Action area; E. The mitigation measures identified in the Planned Action EIS and attached to this ordinance as Exhibit B, together with adopted City development regulations, will adequately mitigate significant impacts from development within the Planned Action area; F. The Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS identify the location, type and amount of development that is contemplated by the Planned Action; G. Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action will protect `n the environment, benefit the public and enhance economic development; Q a� E z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance r 2 Q Packet Pg. 675 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT H. The City has provided numerous opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the proposed Planned Action; has considered all comments received; and, as appropriate, has modified the proposal or mitigation measures in response to comments; I. The Highway 99 Subarea Plan is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36.70A.200(1), and any future projects which meet the definition of an essential public facility will not qualify as Planned Actions; J. The Planned Action applies to a defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundaries; and K. Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned Action, with implementation of mitigation measures identified in the EIS. SECTION 4. Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining Projects as Planned Actions. A. Planned Action Area. The Planned Action designation shall apply to the area shown in Exhibit A. B. Environmental Document. A Planned Action determination for a site -specific c� implementing project application shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the r Draft EIS issued by the City on June 2, 2017, and the Final EIS published on . The Draft N and Final EISs shall comprise the Planned Action EIS. The mitigation measures contained in N Exhibit B are based upon the findings of the Planned Action EIS and shall, along with adopted a� c City regulations, provide the framework that the City will use to impose appropriate conditions c on qualifying Planned Action projects. O C. Planned Action Designated. Land uses and activities described in the Planned Action .0 EIS, subject to the thresholds described in subsection 3.1) and the mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B, are designated Planned Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031. A development application for a site -specific Planned Action project located within the Highway 99 Subarea Planned Action Area shall be designated as a Planned Action if it meets the criteria set forth in subsection 3.1) of this ordinance and applicable laws, codes, development regulations and standards of the City. D. Planned Action Qualifications. The following thresholds shall be used to determine if a site -specific development proposed within the Highway 99 Planned Action Area is contemplated by the Planned Action and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action EIS: (1) Land Use. The following general categories/types of land uses, which are 3 permitted or conditionally permitted in zoning districts applicable to the Highway 99 a Planned Action Area, and subject to any limitations in size contained in the applicable = zoning districts, are considered Planned Actions: Anticipated land uses are further 'n identified below: a (a) Multiple dwellings; a� (b) Office uses, including but not limited to medical office; z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 2 r 3 Q Packet Pg. 676 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT (c) Retail and service uses; (d) Medical and health care uses; (e) Mixed use development (e) Utilities and capital facilities. Individual land uses considered to be Planned Actions shall include those uses specifically listed in development regulations applicable to the zoning classifications applied to properties within the Planned Action Area. (2) Development Thresholds. a) The following amount of various new land uses are contemplated by the Planned Action: Land Use Development Amount Non-residential uses, including 1,634,685 square feet of building office, retail, service and area medical/health care uses Residential 3,325 dwelling units (b) If future development proposals in the Highway 99 Planned Action Area exceed the development thresholds specified in this ordinance, further environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197-11-172. Furthermore, if proposed development would alter the assumptions and analysis in the Planned Action EIS, further environmental review may be required. Shifting the development amount between categories of uses may be permitted so long as the total build -out does not exceed the aggregate amount of development and trip generation reviewed in the EIS, and so long as the impacts of that development have been identified in the Planned Action EIS and are mitigated consistent with Exhibit B. (c). Building Heights. Building heights shall be as established in the applicable zoning classification and as evaluated in the Planned Action EIS. (3) Transportation. (a) Trip Ranges & Thresholds. The Planned Action EIS analyzed and identified mitigation r N N N. for X,XXX new pm peak hour trips in the Planned Action area. Uses or activities that would a exceed these maximum trip levels will require additional SEPA review. _ a E Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance r 4 Q Packet Pg. 677 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT (b) Concurrency. The determination of transportation impacts shall be based on the City's concurrency management program and the level of service standards copted in the 0 Comprehensive Plan. v (c) Traffic Impact Mitigation. All planned action projects shall pay, as a condition of approval, their proportionate share of local street improvements according to the schedule in Edmonds City Code 3.36.125. Impact fees will be determined according to the methodology E contained in Chapter 3.36. o a� (d) Director Discretion. The Development Services Director, in consultation with the City Engineer, shall have discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent 0 with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (latest edition) or an c� alternative manual accepted by the Director at his or her sole discretion, for each project permit application proposed under this Planned Action. E (4) Elements of the Environment and Degree of Impacts. A proposed project that would o result in a significant change in the type or degree of impacts to any of the elements of the v environment analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, would not qualify as a Planned Action. L m (5) Changed Conditions. Should environmental conditions change significantly from c those analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official may determine r that the Planned Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental environmental N N N review is conducted. E. Planned Action Review Criteria. (1) The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate as planned actions, pursuant to O RCW 43.21C.030, applications that meet all of the following conditions: o (a) the proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this U a ordinance; m c (b) the proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and Section 4.D of this ordinance; a (c) the proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Section 3.1) o of this ordinance; c (d) the proposal is consistent with the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and the E Highway 99 Subarea Plan; a (e) the proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS; 3 (f) the proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the _a measures identified in Exhibit B, and other applicable city regulations, together with any = modifications or variances or special permits that may be required; (g) the proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and Q regulations, and the Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation; and E z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 2 r 5 Q Packet Pg. 678 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT (h) the proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36.70A.200(1). (2) The City shall base its decision on review of a SEPA checklist, or an alternative form approved by the Department of Ecology, and review of the application and supporting documentation. (3) A proposal that meets the criteria of this section shall be considered to qualify and be designated as a Planned Action, consistent with the requirements or RCW 43.21C.030, WAC 197-11-164 et seq, and this ordinance. F. Effect of Planned Action (1) Designation as a Planned Action project means that a qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this ordinance and found to be consistent with its development parameters and thresholds, and with the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action EIS. (2) Upon determination by the City's SEPA Responsible Official that the proposal meets `m c the criteria of Section 3.D and qualifies as a Planned Action, the proposal shall not require a c� SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to r SEPA. N N G. Planned Action Permit Process. Applications for Planned Actions shall be reviewed 4) pursuant to the following process. c (1) Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements of the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code. Applications for Planned Actions shall be made � on forms provided by the City and shall include a SEPA checklist, or an approved Planned Action 2 checklist. a (2) The City's Director of Development Services or designee shall determine whether the application is complete as provided in Edmonds City Code 20.02.003. (3) If the application is for a project within the Planned Action Area defined in Exhibit A, the application will be reviewed to determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project. The SEPA Responsible Official shall notify the applicant of his/her decision. If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action, it shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in Edmonds City Code Chapter 20.02, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required. The decision of the SEPA Responsible Official regarding qualification as a Planned Action shall be final. (4) Public notice and review for projects that qualify as Planned Actions shall be tied to the underlying permit and shall follow the procedures set forth in Edmonds City Code Chapter 6 20.03. If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action. If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying Q permit, no special notice is required by this ordinance. E z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 2 r 6 Q Packet Pg. 679 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT (5) Development Agreement.[for discussion] To provide additional certainty about applicable requirements, the City or an applicant may request consideration and execution of a development agreement for a Planned Action project. The development agreement may address review procedures applicable to a Planned Action project, permitted uses, mitigation measures, payment of impact fees or provision of improvements through other methods, design standards, phasing, vesting of development rights, or any other topic that may properly be considered in a development agreement consistent with RCW 36.70B.170 et seq. (6) If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action, the SEPA Responsible Official shall so notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City's SEPA regulations and the requirements of state law. The notice shall describe the elements of the application that result in failure to qualify as a Planned Action. (7) Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements. The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non -qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS. SECTION 5. Monitoring and Review. r N A. The City shall monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action N N Sub -area to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this ordinance and the Planned N. Action EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the Highway 99 Planned Action Area. B. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed no later than five years from its effective date by the SEPA Responsible Official to determine the continuing relevance of its assumptions and findings with respect to environmental conditions in the Planned Action area, the impacts of development, and required mitigation measures. Based upon this review, the City may propose amendments to this ordinance or may supplement or revise the Planned Action EIS. C. [if appropriate based on impacts to state facilities] When planned action monitoring indicates that development proposals generate XXX pm peak hour trips have been submitted, the City will begin to work towards developing a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to address identified impacts to state transportation facilities. The MOU may address the timing, design and funding of state facilities, and/or such topics as the parties may determine. SECTION 6. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance or any mitigation 3 measure imposed thereto, and any ordinance or regulation of the City, the provisions of this _a ordinance shall control EXCEPT that the provision of any International Code shall supersede. _ SECTION 7. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid by a Q court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the constitutionality or validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 2 r 7 Q Packet Pg. 680 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY PASSED _ day of 12017 APPROVED _ day of .2017 PUBLISHED _ day of 2017 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Edmonds as hereon indicated. r N N N. CITY CLERK rn c� 3 z a H H a E Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance r 8 Q Packet Pg. 681 JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT 8.2.e EXHIBIT A PLANNED ACTION AREA I I ! ,- _ i { IT I I LYNNWOOD rtr. r" r ESPENC C ' F ` 22�Tm sivy �s•�r-i I ar. Mr�r{ r ?3QTm �. — __... : MOUNTLAKE TERRACE Fl, _ r I �3710o sr sw i f i r I f r- .t I i 4 I )MONDS i ■ i T W i 5 'i • t-- ----- k m.�. _ Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance m N N N Packet Pg. 682 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT EXHIBIT B Highway 99 Subarea Plan PLANNED ACTION EIS MITIGATION DOCUMENT The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires environmental review for project and non - project proposals that may have adverse impacts on the environment. In order to meet SEPA requirements, the City of Edmonds issued the Draft Highway 99 Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 2, 2017 and the Final Highway 99 Planned Action EIS on XXXXX, 2017. The Draft and Final EIS are referenced collectively herein as the "EIS." The EIS has identified probably significant impacts that would occur with future development in the Planned Action area, together with a number of potential measures to mitigate those significant impacts. The purpose of this Mitigation Document is to establish specific mitigation measure for qualified planned action development proposals, based on significant impacts identified in the EIS. The mitigation measures would apply to future development proposals that are consistent with the planned action development envelope reviewed in the EIS and that are located within the Planned Action area (see Exhibit A). USE OF TERMS r N N Brief definitions of terms used in this Mitigation Document are provided below. a� SEPA Terms c The discussion of mitigation measures may refer to the word's action, planned action or proposal and for reference, these terms are defined below: • "Action" means projects or programs financed, licensed, regulated, conducted or approved by an agency. "Project actions" involve decisions on a specific project such as a construction or management activity for a defined geographic area. "Non -project" actions involve decisions about policies, plans or programs (WAC 197-11-704) • "Planned Action" refers to types of project actions that are designated by ordinance for a specific geographic area and addressed in an EIS in conjunction with a comprehensive plan or subarea plan, a fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master planned development or phased project (WAC 197-11-164). • "Proposal" means a proposed action that may be an action or regulatory decision of an agency, or any action proposed by applicants (WAC 197-11-784) Other Terms The Planned Action area may be referred to as the Highway 99 Planned Action Area, Highway 99 Subarea, project area or project site in this document. General Interpretation Q Where a mitigation measure includes the words "shall" or "will," inclusion of that measure is mandatory in order to qualify a project as a Planned Action. Where "should" or "would" appear, E z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 2 r 10 Q Packet Pg. 683 8.2.e JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT the mitigation measures may be considered by the project applicant as a source of additional mitigation, as feasible or necessary, to ensure that a project qualifies as a planned action and/or to reduce or avoid impacts. Unless stated specifically otherwise, the mitigation measures that require preparation of plans, conduct of studies, construction of improvements, conduct of maintenance activities, etc., are the responsibility of the applicant or designee to fund and/or perform. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER THE PLANNED ACTION The proposal reviewed in this EIS include designation of the Highway 99 Subarea (see Exhibit A) as a Planned Acton area for the purpose of SEPA compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164, adoption of comprehensive plan amendments for the Highway 99 Subarea, and adoption of zoning code amendments addressing zoning classifications, design standards, parking standards. The planned action designation would encourage redevelopment in the Highway 99 Subarea to create increased housing choices and an attractive pedestrian -oriented streetscape, provide opportunities for medical services growth, provide for enhanced multi - modal mobility, and provide for a greater mix of uses in the subarea. Under this Planned Action, redevelopment would add about 3,013 new jobs and 3,325 new housing units through 2035. MITIGATION r Based on the EIS, which are incorporated by reference, this Mitigation Document summarizes N N v significant adverse environmental impacts that are anticipated to occur in conjunction with the development of planned action projects. Mitigation measures, identified in the EIS, are reiterated here for inclusion in conjunction with proposed projects to mitigate related impacts =a and to qualify as planned action projects. O Consistency review under the Planned Action, site plan review, and other permit approvals will be required for specific development actions proposed under the Planned Action designation (WAC 197-11-172). Additional project conditions may be imposed on planned action projects based upon the analysis of the Planned Action in relationship to independent requirements of the City, state or federal requirements or review criteria. Any applicant for a project within the planned action area may propose alternative mitigation measures, if appropriate and/or as a result of changed circumstance, in order to allow an equivalent substitute mitigation for identified impacts. Such modifications would be evaluated by the City SEPA Responsible Official prior to any project approvals by the City. As permitted by WAC 197-11-660, there may be some adverse impacts that are unavoidable because reasonable or feasible mitigation cannot be achieved for the Planned Action The combination of regulations applicable to each element of the environment and mitigation a measures identified in the EIS and documented in this Mitigation Document that are applied to = any planned action proposal will adequately mitigate all significant environmental impacts 'n associated with planned action proposals, except for those impacts that are identified as Q significant unavoidable adverse impacts. a� E z Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 2 r 11 Q Packet Pg. 684 JUNE 2017 - PRELIMINARY DRAFT 8.2.e Mitigation measures are provided below for each element of the environment considered in the EIS. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The EIS identifies significant impacts, unavoidable adverse impacts, and mitigation measures for potential impacts associated with land use, plans and policies, aesthetics, transportation, and public services and utilities. Please refer to the Draft and Final EIS for complete text associated with each element of the environment. The following lists all mitigation measures applicable to impacts for each element of the environment. Land Use [insert final mms] Plans and Policies [insert final mms] Aesthetics [insert final mms] Transportation [insert final mms] Public Services and Utilities [insert final mms] Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance a E 2 r 12 Q Packet Pg. 685 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Resolution of Intent to Designate Highway 99 Subarea as a Residential Targeted Area (10 min) Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Economic Development Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background In an effort to spur investment and redevelopment in slow -to -develop urban centers statewide and in fulfillment of Growth Management Act objectives, in 1995 the State Legislature inaugurated the Multifamily Property Tax Exemption (MFTE) Program by passing enabling legislation contained in RCW 84.14. This enabling legislation provides the authority and process for individual jurisdictions to implement the MFTE program in their communities. In short, the MFTE provides an incentive to developers to invest in "residential targeted areas" - areas designated by cities through their GMA- compliant comprehensive planning and subarea planning processes to receive greater density of multifamily and commercial development. Often called "urban centers" or "urban villages," these areas are intended to become walkable, amenity - rich, transit -supportive, mixed -use communities where future growth in housing and employment can be readily accommodated. Unfortunately, in many cities the transformation from current conditions to the intended "urban village" is often slow and fraught with challenges. Be they competition with higher - rent locales that attract developers, or the inherent complications of urban redevelopment (unwilling property sellers, need to accumulate multiple parcels, existing long-term leases, etc.), in many cities these factors can stall for years or decades the transformation to such planned -for "urban villages." The MFTE incentive is one small tool that can help provide incentives in these areas to help counteract some of these challenges for developers and investors, thereby encouraging them to develop multifamily and mixed -use projects in these areas. Per State law, the MFTE is applicable to projects containing at least four dwelling units and provides for an exemption from property tax valuation of the improvement value of the residential portion of the development. Property taxes continue to be assessed and collected on the improvement value of the nonresidential (e.g. commercial) component of the project and the increased land value. State law allows for the exemption pursuant to two options: The standard exemption period is for 8 years. A longer exemption period of up to 12 years is provided for projects that include at least 20% of the dwelling units as affordable to rent or buy for low- and moderate -income households. (Low-income households have incomes no greater than 80% of the area median income, while moderate -income households have incomes no greater than 115% of the area median income.) In August 2016 the City Council designated the Westgate Mixed Use Zone as a Residential Targeted Area for the purposes of implementing the MFTE in that area. Subsequently in October 2016 the City Council Packet Pg. 686 8.3 approved the addition of a new Chapter 3.38, entitled "Multi -Family Housing Tax Exemption" to the Edmonds City Code which lays out the State -mandated provisions for implementation of the MFTE program. Those provisions, at Sec. 3.38.040.A, identify the Westgate Mixed Use Zone as the City's sole residential targeted area. In addition, the City Council chose to provide only the 12-year exemption option that requires the provision of at least 20% of the dwelling units as affordable to rent or buy for low- and moderate -income households. Staff Recommendation Adopt the Resolution of Intent to designate the Highway 99 Subarea as Residential Targeted Zone for implementation of Multi -Family Tax Exemption Program and schedule a public hearing for the regular City Council meeting on August 15, 2017 at 7:OOpm in Council Chambers. Narrative Resolution of Intent The first step towards implementation of the MFTE program in a new "urban center" within Edmonds, as per RCW 84.14, is for a City Council to pass a Resolution of Intent to designate the intended "residential targeted area" where additional implementation of the MFTE program will occur. Pursuant to the pending approval by City Council of the Highway 99 Subarea Plan and related zoning provisions, expected later this Summer, that Subarea is intended to become an "urban center" whose purpose includes fostering development of a full range of commercial and residential uses, including market -rate and affordable housing in stand-alone and mixed -use developments. Nevertheless, even with pending approval of the new Subarea Plan, residential development in the Highway 99 Corridor will be more likely to occur if the MFTE Program is implemented as an incentive to developers to consider the Highway 99 Subarea, especially given that dozens of other locations in the region and state provide this incentive. For these reasons, the current proposal is to designate the Highway 99 Subarea as a "residential targeted area" in order to implement the MFTE program there. In order to do so, the City Council must first pass the attached Resolution of Intent to designate the Highway 99 Subarea as a "residential targeted area" and set a public hearing at its regular meeting on August 15, 2017. Upon conclusion of the public hearing and in consideration of any public testimony, the City Council may then pass a Resolution designating the Highway 99 Subarea as a "residential targeted area." In addition, as a companion piece, City staff will develop the corresponding minor amendments to ECC Chapter 3.38 that will add the Highway 99 Subarea to the list of "residential targeted areas" in the City of Edmonds and submit for Council approval at that time. This proposal was presented to the Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee and the Finance Committee on 6/27/17, at which time both committees recommended forwarding the resolution to the 7/18/17 regular Council meeting for approval. Attachments: DRAFT RESO OF INTENT MFTE - HWY 99 Packet Pg. 687 8.3.a �YI]�iy�[1]�VCIa A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, NOTIFYING THE PUBLIC OF ITS INTENT TO DESIGNATE THE HIGHWAY 99 SUBAREA AS A RESIDENTIAL TARGETED AREA FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A MULTIFAMILY TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS Chapter 84.14 of the Revised Code of Washington provides for temporary special valuations for eligible improvements associated with multifamily housing, especially within urban centers deficient in planned residential development; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council is in the process of adopting a new Subarea Plan and related zoning code amendments for the Highway 99 Corridor, which designates the Corridor as an urban center whose purpose includes fostering development of a full range of commercial and residential uses, including market -rate and affordable housing in stand-alone and mixed -use developments; and WHEREAS, multifamily residential development is lagging in the Highway 99 Subarea, while commercial development there and residential development elsewhere in the City is occurring; and WHEREAS, implementation of the Multi -Family Tax Exemption program, authorized by 84.14 RCW, may provide sufficient incentive to encourage residential development in the Highway 99 Subarea; and WHEREAS, in order to establish a Multifamily Tax Exemption Program, the City must designate one or more residential targeted areas within which the temporary special valuation may be granted to qualifying residential improvements; and WHEREAS, RCW 84.14.040(2) states that a governing authority may adopt a resolution of intent to designate one or more residential targeted areas; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 84.14.040(2), the resolution must state the time and place of a hearing to be held by the governing authority to consider the designation of the residential targeted area(s); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Edmonds intends to designate the Highway 99 Subarea, pursuant to pending City Council approval and adoption of the Subarea Plan, as a residential targeted area for the purposes of establishing a Multifamily Tax Exemption Program. Section 2. A public hearing to consider the designation of the Highway 99 Subarea as a residential targeted area will be held at a regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council on Packet Pg. 688 8.3.a August 15, 2017 at 7:00 pm in Council Chambers, located within the Public Safety Complex at 250 5`h Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington. RESOLVED this _ day of , 2017. APPROVED: DAVID O. EARLING, MAYOR ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 689 8.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Historic Informational Panels for Yost Park and Waterfront Mills (15 min) Staff Lead: Frances Chapin Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Frances Chapin Background/History In thinking about the 125th anniversary of the City the Historic Preservation Commission proposed the creation of two informational panels to commemorate the history of the waterfront area and the mills that populated it in early years. The suggestion was made to place one panel in a location on Sunset close to where a photograph was taken of the waterfront mills in 1910. A second panel was proposed for Yost Park near one of the existing old -growth cedar stumps that bears notches used by the loggers. The concept was discussed by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services staff, and with the Arts Commission. City Council approved expenditure for the informational panels on Dec 13, 2016, but requested that the final design and proposed sites come back to City Council for final approval following Planning board review and Arts Commission review. Planning Board reviewed the proposed panels on June 14, 2017. Planning Board recommended City Council approve the informational panels with the understanding that the one on Sunset might need to be moved in the future and making sure there is reference that connects the information on the two signs. The Arts Commission reviewed and approved final designs and sites on June 5, 2017. Staff Recommendation Council final approval of historic informational panels design and sites for Yost Park and Waterfront Mills. Narrative The proposed panel designs, sizes and locations are illustrated in the attached presentation. The designer will finalize the designs following City Council approval and it will take about 6 - 8 weeks to fabricate and install. Attachments: Approved MinutesPB170614f Approved MinutesCm121316 spec mtg Approved MinutesCmd121316 EACDraft Min June for agenda memo CCpresentation Packet Pg. 690 8.4.a CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES June 14, 2017 Vice Chair Monroe called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5 h Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Nathan Monroe, Vice Chair Matthew Cheung Todd Cloutier Phil Lovell Daniel Robles Mike Rosen BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Alicia Crank (excused) Carreen Rubenkonig (excused) STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder Newly appointed Board Member, Mike Rosen, was welcomed to the Board. READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF MAY 24, 2017 BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. BOARD MEMBER ROBLES SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS No one in the audience indicated a desire to comment during this portion of the meeting. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Vice Chair Monroe referred the Board to the written report that was provided by the Development Services Director. Board Member Lovell observed that the June 2nd Affordable Housing Conference attracted a large number of participants, including some Planning Board Members. Packet Pg. 691 8.4.a PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ACTION AREA TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG) Mr. Chave provided two maps, one illustrating the existing zoning along the Highway 99 Corridor, and the other illustrating the proposed zoning. He noted that the Board is generally familiar with the proposal, which is a legislative rather than a quasi-judicial action because it would apply area wide. He reviewed that the Planning Board previously considered the Highway 99 Subarea Plan and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council. In addition, the Board conducted a public hearing on May loth on amendments to the development regulations to establish new standards for a consolidated CG zone in the Highway 99 area. The proposed zoning changes were shown as part of the Board's May loth hearing presentation. Following the public hearing relative to the rezone proposal, the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing next week on both the zoning code and the map. Mr. Chave reviewed that, through the Planned Action process, the City is working to consolidate the zoning throughout the Highway 99 area. Historically, the properties have been zoned both CG and CG2, but there is very little difference between the two zones except for the height limit. Currently, the CG zone allows a maximum height of 60 feet, and the CG2 zone allows a maximum height of 75 feet. The proposed rezone would make the overall zoning along the corridor consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map, which designates the entire corridor for a consistent development pattern. Through the Planned Action process, the properties that are currently zoned CG and CG2 would be consolidated into a single CG zone, and new standards and design parameters would apply. The proposed action would bring all zoning into consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. In addition to consolidating the CG and CG2 zoning, the proposal would also rezone some properties that are currently zoned Multi -Family Residential (RM) to CG. He explained that, in some cases, commercial property owners also own the adjacent RM-zoned property, which means that the zoning is split in some cases. The intent is to consolidate these RM-zoned properties into the CG zone. In addition to providing greater consistency, the new CG zone has built-in transition standards. For example, combined stepbacks and setbacks are not required in the current CG zone, but would be added as part of the new standards and design parameters. The thought is that some of the transition issues could be handled via the zoning standards rather than through transitional zoning areas. Mr. Chave recalled that when the Board previously conducted a public hearing on development code amendments to implement the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, some of the comments were related to the anticipated CG zoning changes. Tonight's hearing offers a formal opportunity for the public to comment specifically on the rezone proposal. Following the public hearing and Planning Board deliberation, the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation to the City Council. Board Member Lovell pointed out that each of the maps identify the properties located within the City of Edmonds, as well as those located within unincorporated Snohomish County (Esperance). Mr. Chave emphasized that the proposal would not change the zoning in the properties located in unincorporated Snohomish County. Board Member Lovell said it is important to make sure the Board Members understand that the current CG zoning allows a maximum height of 60 feet and the current CG2 zoning allows a maximum height of 75 feet. As proposed, the CG and CG2 zones would be consolidated and the maximum height would be 75 feet along the entire corridor. Mr. Chave pointed out that the only reason for the two zones (CG and CG2) was to follow through on the distinctions made by Snohomish County prior to when the properties were annexed into the City. Vice Chair Monroe pointed out that there are slivers of white area on the two zoning maps. Mr. Chave responded that these identify City rights -of -way, which are considered un-zoned properties. Stanley Piha, Edmonds, said he participated on the original Highway 99 Task Force and he also owns property within the Highway 99 Subarea. He commented that the evolution of the proposed Highway 99 Subarea Plan meets many of the goals and objectives brought forward by the original task force a number of years ago. He said he supports the good work done by the consultant and City staff and felt the plan would offer an opportunity for a wonderful transformation to occur along the Edmonds portion of Highway 99. He encouraged the Board to recommend approval of the proposed rezone as presented by staff. Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 2 Packet Pg. 692 No one else in the audience indicated a desire to comment and the public portion of the hearing was closed. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE FINDINGS OF FACT, ANALYSIS AND ATTACHMENTS IN THE STAFF REPORT AND FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PROPOSED REZONE OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ACTION AREA. BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. UPDATE FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DIRECTOR Ms. Hite provided an overview of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services projects that have been done or are in progress. Civic Field Acquisition and Master Plan. The City purchased the Civic Field from the Edmonds School District in February of 2016, and this was followed by a robust community process, working with consultant Walker Macy, to create a master plan for the site. An advisory committee was formed to provide guidance to the consultant and staff, and the Planning Board played an integral part in the process, as well. The final Civic Field Master Plan is a culmination of a very robust public conversation, with a lot of give and take and compromise. The goal moving forward is to complete the survey and geotechnical work this year. Staff recently sent out a notice to tenants of the stadium advising that they must vacate their space by October 31st. The plan is to take down the facility in November. Monies will be built into the 2018 Capital Improvement Plan for design development work, and staff will also prepare a financial package for the park's redevelopment, including grant applications. Implementation of the plan is anticipated to cost about $10 million, and it is hoped that construction work can start in 2020 or before. City Park. The spray pad at City Park opened on May 26th. The weather was awesome, and the facility was packed. It continues to be very popular. To mitigate noise for the neighbors, the City planted a number of trees and additional foliage. Staff has received a lot of favorable comments about the new facility. Board Member Lovell asked if the water retention/recirculation system is working as planned, and Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Rather than the direct -to - drain approach, the new spray pad uses a water recycling system. The system is backwashed once each week to clean it out and start with fresh water, and the Public Health Department has given it a clean bill of health. • Dayton Street Plaza. A ribbon -cutting ceremony for the Dayton Street Plaza was held in March. This gathering area in the downtown allows people to have a resting/stopping spot when walking from downtown to the waterfront. There have been a number of performances in the plaza area, as well. • 4`h Avenue Cultural Corridor Interim Projects. The artwork, Luminous Forest, was dedicated in conjunction with the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA)'s IOth Anniversary celebration in July of 2016. The artwork leads walkers from Main Street to the ECA. • Wayfinding Signage/Park Signage. The existing wayfinding sign at 5th and Main Street is scheduled for replacement in 2017, and the new sign will be consistent with the current sign program standards. New signs were installed at Yost Park and Maplewood Park, and the City has received a number of favorable comments from the public. The Parks Department will continue to update wayfinding and park signage as time allows. She noted that the old sign at Yost Park was donated to the Edmonds Museum. • Marina Beach. The Marina Beach Master Plan was adopted in February of 2016 following a robust public process. The purpose of the plan was to find a route for Willow Creek to come across the parkland. Parallel to the Master Plan work, the City is working on a proposal to daylight Willow Creek. However, there is no funding set aside for the Master Plan implementation, which will not likely occur for at least five years. Board Member Lovell asked about the City's plans for sequencing major projects. Ms. Hite answered that Civic Field will likely remain the first priority if the City is successful in reaching its financial goals. The project to daylight Willow Creek will not likely be ready to submit for grant funding until the 2018 cycle, and construction will not likely occur until at least 2020. The daylighting project will be done in conjunction with implementation of the Marina Beach Master Plan, and the total cost of the two projects is estimated to be between $6 and $10 million. There have been extensive discussions about looking for federal grant funding, which depends on the environment at the federal level for parks grants and salmon rehabilitation. Board Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 3 Packet Pg. 693 4.a Member Lovell pointed out that the City is in the process of doing drainage work in the area. Ms. Hite explained that there are several solutions associated improving drainage in the area, and daylighting Willow Creek is just one. Other projects include cleaning out the culverts and adding another pump station to the treatment plant. • Fishing Pier. The fishing pier was opened again to the public last September, but there are some issues that need to be addressed. The contractor will be back on site starting June 15"' to repair some of the center joints. It will not be necessary to close the entire pier during the approximately 5-week construction period, but some areas will likely be closed as work is done under specific sections of the pier. The work will be done at no cost to the City since the project is still under warranty. • Public Restroom. A new downtown public restroom was opened in 2016, and informational panels were recently installed on the east wall of the new facility. The Economic Development Department and Cultural Services Division worked with the Edmonds Museum to create the historical panels, which were funded by the Hubbard Family Foundation. • Edmonds Marsh. The City will continue to work on daylighting Willow Creek, and the City will continue to contract with Keeley O'Connell to project manage the phases of the marsh rehabilitation efforts. • Critical Areas Report for Edmonds Parks. Recent changes in the Critical Areas Ordinance required the Parks Department to hire a consultant to prepare critical areas reports for all parks where maintenance and restoration activities are expected to be conducted within critical areas during the next five years. The reports will enable park maintenance staff and volunteer stewardship groups to lawfully continue removing invasive vegetation and restoring native vegetation within critical areas following approval by the Planning Division. • Parklet Development. The City has received requests from a number of private business owners in the downtown about the idea of constructing parklets. The City's plan is to construct a parklet on 4`' Avenue between Main Street and the ECA as a pilot project to gauge interest. Vice Chair Monroe noted that creating parklets could result in a loss of parking. He asked if there is a process whereby the City will solicit feedback from the community about whether or not this would be desirable. Ms. Hite said the first parklet would be constructed closer to the ECA where there is not as much demand for parking space. The goal is to see how much it is utilized before considering opportunities to expand to other locations. • Outdoor Fitness Zones. Money has been set aside in the Capital Improvement Program for the past two years to provide leverage or matching funds for grants to complete this project. The City's grant application has been put on hold based on a recent decision by Verdant Health to place a hold on all grants pending discussions with their auditors. The project is still in Verdant's queue, but it will not be done until grant funding has been received. • Meadowdale Playfields. The City is partnering with the City of Lynnwood and the Edmonds School District to renovate the Meadowdale Playfields in 2017. The intent is to replace the natural dirt and grass fields with synthetic fields so they can be played on year-round. The City Council approved an interlocal agreement with the school district and the City of Lynnwood, and the City of Lynnwood recently awarded the contract. The project should be on line by the end of the year. • City Storage Building. The previous building was destroyed by an arson fire, and the City is in the process of replacing it with a larger facility that will serve the needs of both the Parks Department and the Public Works Department. Progress towards completion of the new building should be made before the end of the year. • Community Garden. This project has been identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program for quite some time, but it has been difficult to find land. City staff is in discussions with Snohomish County about entering into an interlocal agreement to use a portion of Esperance Park for a Community Garden. Snohomish County recently completed a master plan for the park, which includes space for a community garden. Working together, they should be able to get the garden area ready for the 2018 growing season. Board Member Lovell asked how large the garden would be, and Ms. Hite answered that it would be about'/2 acre, divided into about 50 raised beds. Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 4 Packet Pg. 694 8.4.a • Veteran's Plaza. There was a very successful ribbon -cutting event on Memorial Day, but there is a final punch list of items that still need to be completed. Waterfront Redevelopment and Walkway Completion. The City has been working parallel to the Senior Center's efforts to rebuild. The City's interest is to pull back the creosote pier from the Sound and introduce a filtration system from the parking lot to the Sound. In addition, the City is interested in completing the walkway south of the Senior Center. The City owns an easement in front of the Ebbtide Condominiums, and it is working with a designer to figure out the possibilities of connecting the walkway. The City has applied for grant funding, and there will also be some funding available from the Real Estate Excise Tax and Park Impact Fees. They are currently in the design phase, and also have a contractor working on the environmental permits that will be needed for the project. The goal is to break ground in 2018 and complete the overwater construction work during the fish window (mid -July through mid - September). • Frances Anderson Center Bandshell. The City received occupancy papers for the new facility today, and it will be used by the Arts Festival this weekend. They have received a number of positive comments about the bandshell, which fits Edmonds nicely. Informational Panels. A committee with representatives from the Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, Development Services, and Parks Department have met to develop draft guidelines for informational panels located in City parks and rights -of -way to ensure a stylistic consistency and sensitivity to number and locations. The informational panels are intended to provide environmental, historical and cultural information associated with specific sites. Two informational panels are currently in development, one for Yost Park to identify an old -growth cedar stump showing notches from logging at the turn of the 20'h century and another for Sunset Avenue showing the waterfront sawmills in 1910. The Historic Preservation Commission developed the concept for the two panels and the design was reviewed by the Arts Commission. The City Council approved allocation of funds to create the two panels in December of 2016, but they required that the Planning Board review the design before final fabrication. Board Member Lovell noted that the proposal is to place an informational sign at the end of Bell Street on Sunset Avenue. He noted that, as currently proposed, a new crossing over the tracks is proposed at Edmonds Street. There have been suggestions that a minipark could be established in this location, as well. He said the Historic Preservation Commission should be made aware of this proposal so they can consider the option of moving the informational sign further north to a higher location at some point in the future. Ms. Hite said it was difficult to find an ideal location on City property that did not have trees that blocked the view. She agreed to invite the group to consider this alternative location, as well. Board Member Lovell inquired about the exact location of the informational sign at Yost Park. Ms. Hite answered that it would be located about 200 feet down a trail off of Main Street that starts near 2nd Avenue where an old -growth cedar stump is located. She noted that a lot of walkers use the trail, and the sign would be highly visible. The intent is to locate it right next to the stump. Board Member Lovell asked if any thought has been given to creating a map to illustrate the location of each of the informational signs, and Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Board Member Robles said that these signs have been used in other cities, and they tend to fade and become weathered over time. He asked if there is sufficient funding to ensure that the signs are high quality. Ms. Hite answered that the signs would be constructed of a high -quality laminate material that is weather resistant. The same material has been used on other signs in the City over the past five years, and they are very happy with the durability of the product. Board Member Robles said he likes the concept of historical panels. However, he asked if the City has considered opportunities for historical panels that celebrate the indigenous community that used to live in Edmonds. Ms. Hite answered that the informational signs that were installed on the new restroom in the downtown tell the story of the indigenous people. Vice Chair Monroe asked if the City is planning to install more informational signs over time. Ms. Hite answered hat is possible as they work with the Historic Preservation Commission to identify stories and places. However, there is Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 5 Packet Pg. 695 nothing planned right now. She cautioned that it is important to balance the number of signs in places where people want to enjoy the natural beauty. Vice Chair Monroe asked about the average cost of the signs, and Ms. Hite answered that they cost about $5,000. Board Member Cheung noted that the history contained on the two new signs is tied together. He suggested that references should be added to somehow tie the two signs together. Ms. Hite agreed that would be appropriate. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE HISTORIC MARKER SIGNS AS PRESENTED BY STAFF WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY BE AWARE THAT THE BELL STREET SIGN MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED IF AND WHEN THE EDMONDS RAILRAOD CROSSING SOLUTION COMES TO FRUITION. VICE CHAIR MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION. BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG MOVED THAT THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO ADD THAT A REFERENCE BE PROVIDED ON EACH SIGN TO CONNECT THE TWO TOGETHER. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION TO AMEND, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE MAIN MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AS AMENDED. Economic Impact of Arts and Cultural/Community Cultural Plan. The Arts Commission and staff are currently working to implement the strategy identified in the Community Cultural Plan involving a study of the economic impact of arts and culture in Edmonds. The study is funded through the Parks Department, Arts Commission and Economic Development Commission, and BERK was selected as the project consultant. The first meeting with the advisory group was held, and stakeholder interviews have been conducted. A survey of the attendees has been tested for use over the summer and early fall, and additional data will be collected from arts and culture nonprofits and businesses. Board Member Rosen asked about the Board's role in the economic impact study. Ms. Hite said the draft will likely come before the Board as the Parks Board before moving on to the City Council. If the Board is interested, they could also be involved in the process via the on-line and in -person surveys that will be conducted over the next several months. Board Member Rosen said it would be helpful to see the methodology the consultant used to prepare the survey, and Ms. Hite agreed to send it to the Board Members. • Willow Creek Fish Hatchery. After nearly 30 years operating the hatchery, Trout Unlimited announced it would be retiring from operations within the next two years. Sound Salmon Solutions, a non-profit organization and regional leader in salmon conservation, has agreed to take over management of the hatchery operations and expand the educational programming and outreach activities at the site. A Professional Services Agreement was signed in February to cover staff time for training and grant writing, and Sound Salmon Solutions staff has been working closely with Trout Unlimited with the goal of fully taking over operations at the facility in 2018. Western Washington University Initiatives. This year the City has had the benefit of several projects from Western Washington University (WWU) students as part of the Sustainable Cities Partnership. Students from the parks and recreation program provided creative and innovate ideas for recreation programming in Edmonds, a marketing class provided proposals for the 4"h Avenue Cultural Corridor, an environmental class provided a Phase 1 environmental assessment of Stella's Landing, and a GIS and marketing class worked on mapping the cemetery. Once the cemetery project is completed, people will be able to find information about where loved ones are buried on line and even view a photo of the actual gravesite. There will also be a map available at the cemetery for those who are not comfortable searching on line. • Urban Forest Management Plan. The Parks Department is working with the Development Services Department to complete an Urban Forest Management Plan in 2017, and they have retained the services of Davey Resources Group to engage with the community to draft the plan. The first public open house is scheduled for June 22nd in the Brackett Room of City Hall from 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. The intent is to create some goals, going forward, for management of the public forests. Board Member Lovell urged Board Members to attend the open house. He recalled that, two years ago, the Tree Board presented a plan to the Planning Board that nearly caused a riot at the public hearing. He expects there Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 6 Packet Pg. 696 8.4.a will be a lot of public participation as the plan moves forward, and it would behoove the Planning Board Members to follow the process closely. • Staffing Changes. After 30 years of service, Renee McRae has retired, and Dave Johnston has been hired as the new Deputy Director. He comes from the City of Tukwila where he serves as the Parks and Recreation Supervisor. Board Member Lovell reminded the Board that one of its members typically participates as a judge in the Sand Sculpture Contest that is held in July. He said he has fulfilled this assignment in past years and it has been a lot of fun. Board Member Robles said he was a judge in 2016, and he found it to be fascinating. Board Member Rosen commented that the presentation provided by Ms. Hite, as well as the written report that was included in the Staff Report, makes him even more proud to be a member of the Edmonds community. Parks not only enhance the quality of life for Edmonds citizens, they also provide an economic value to the City. Ms. Hite said she has an incredible staff team, which means that she does not have to be the lead on all projects. She said she loves her job, and feels that Edmonds is an amazing town that supports parks. Board Member Lovell commented that, looking to the future, the City may be reaching the point where it may need to consider opportunities for obtaining additional funding for parks, and the concept of creating a Metropolitan Park District may come up again. Ms. Hite reviewed that Board Member Lovell participated on the committee that researched the concept a few years ago, and there was a lot of support for the approach. However, at the time, the financial forecast improved and the City Council made the decision not to float it as an initiative. As the City looks forward, the financial picture is tight and it may be appropriate to consider the option once again if there is community support for projects such as daylighting Willow Creek and implementing the Marina Beach and Civic Field Master Plans. She said she has discussed the concept with Mayor Earling and also submitted an article in THE EDMONDS BEACON regarding options for financing projects. Forming a Metropolitan Park District is one option the legislature has given to cities in the state, and quite a few have taken advantage of the opportunity. Board Member Lovell asked if the impetus to reconsider the option would come from the Mayor or the City Council. Ms. Hite advised that if the City Council is interested in pursuing the option again, Mayor Earling could direct her work to do that. It would likely be part of the financial discussion that takes place during the budget process. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA The Board reviewed that the agenda for the June 28th meeting includes a review of the proposed Planned Action Ordinance for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, as well as a presentation on the 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan update. The July 12th agenda includes a public hearing on the Proposed Planned Action Ordinance for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, and a public hearing on the 2017 Update to the Water Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chair Monroe asked that the extended agenda be updated to include an update on the Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture Study, as well as an update on the Urban Forest Management Plan. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Vice Chair Monroe reported on his attendance at the May 17th Economic Development Commission Meeting where they came up with a number of topics to focus on over the next six to eight months. He also reported that he met with Mayor Earling to discuss the Board's report to the City Council on June 20th. He advised that he and Chair Rubenkonig would work together to prepare the report. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Rosen said he was happy to be a member of the Board and will work hard to learn so that he can add value to the Board as quickly as possible. Board Member Lovell welcomed him on the Board and said he looks forward to his participation and valuable input. ADJOURNMENT Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 7 Packet Pg. 697 8.4.a The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. T aD C c� a �a C 0 r R E L 0 4- C :i L 0 to No C N E t V Q Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 8 Packet Pg. 698 8.4.b EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APPROVED MINUTES DECEMBER 13, 2016 The City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:40 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 51h Avenue North, Edmonds. Elected Officials Present Kristiana Johnson, Council President Mike Nelson, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Mayor Dave Earling Others Present Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to discuss a real estate matter per RCW 42.30.110(1)(c). ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. DAVID O. EARLING, MAYOR SC PASSEY, CITY K Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page I Packet Pg. 699 8.4.c EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES December 13, 2016 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT N. Bickar, Police Officer Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir. Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5"' Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened witli the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Council President Johnson requested Items 4.4, Board & Commission Reappointments, and Item 5.2, Dale Hoggins Proclamation, be postponed to a future meeting. Councilmember Teitzel requested Item 7.3, Revision to the January 3, 2017 Extended Agenda, be added to the agenda. City Clerk Scott Passey advised the Extended Agenda is a planning tool and requests can be submitted to him. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA, POSTPONING ITEMS 4.4, BOARD & COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENTS, AND ITEM 5.2, DALE HOGGINS PROCLAMATION, TO A FUTURE MEETING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 6, 2016 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 700 8.4.c 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS 3. BOARD & COMMISSION RETIREMENTS 5. PROSECUTOR'S CONTRACT RENEWAL 5. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS 1. AWARD PRESENTATION FOR RONDI NORDAL Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite said this is an opportunity to honor a youth member of the community, Rondi Nordal, who recently received an award for her outstanding service. Ms. Nordal has done an incredible job on the fishing pier, doing surveys and working with Students Saving Salmon. Ms. Hite introduced the presenters, Laura Goff, Snohomish Conservation District, and Val Stewart. Ms. Goff commented she was thrilled to recognize Ms. Nordal in her own community; she was previously honored at the District's Better Grounds celebration. The District recognizes conservation leaders through Snohomish County; Ms. Nordal was one of four 2016 Youth Conservation Leader of the Year for her outstanding efforts and leadership to protect salmon streams in her area. She congratulated Ms. Nordal for being a 2016 Conservation Leader of the Year. Ms. Stewart explained she met Ms. Nordal approximately two years ago when she came to the first Students Saving Salmon meeting at Edmonds-Woodway High School. Ms. Nordal has been an inspirational leader in Students Saving Salmon Club at Edmonds-Woodway High School and her leadership has brought many student into the club and she guided the creation of opportunity for civic engagement and citizen science to promote conservation and restoration of salmon habitat in the Edmonds community. She is a shining example of a young leader and environmental steward. Supporters of the Club and who enabled its success include are Assistant Principal Jeff Bennett, Advisors Peggy Foreman and Joe Scordino as well as faculty advisors. Examples of Ms. Nordal's accomplishments include working with City staff on the Edmonds Fishing Pier rehabilitation project, interviewing fishermen and visitors to learn what they needed and what could be improved; an "On the Fence" project, "The Story of Salmon;" working with the Steam Team and coordinating lab samples and data analysis at a North Seattle Community College lab; making presentations to various government agencies and environmental organizations; writing to legislators and governors; and being in the local and regional news media. Ms. Nordal has initiative, asks questions and has ideas and puts them into action and inspires others to join. Students and adults admire her and follow her example; she has a natural desire to educate as well as ask questions and listen to views before thoughtfully responding. Her initiative and passion to converse and enhance salmon habitat has helped raise awareness about the plight of salmon in the greater community. Ms. Nordal walks the talk and can be counted on to lead environmental efforts to ensure healthy ecosystems for the next generations. She is a student at Western Washington University in environmental science where she joined a new organization, Students for Salish Sea. She was also selected as a NOAA intern last summer are usually only college students, working on the Elwha Dam restoration project. Ms. Nordal thanked the Council for honoring her receipt of this award; it means a lot to her to be recognized for the work done in the community and for people to see what she and others have done. The program information at the awards ceremony emphasized the importance of coming together and working as a community. She was happy to be honored as it reached out to the community and educated others toward a common goal of protecting the environment, resources and the natural world. The natural environment provides the resources for daily life as well as the health and quality of life. She thanked Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 701 8.4.c everyone who has helped her including her parents, family, friends, teachers, advisers and elected officials. She hope she had inspired others to do good work. 2. DALE NOGGINS PROCLAMATION This item was rescheduled to a future meeting. 3. FDMONDS DOWNTOWN ALLIANCE 2017 WORK PLAN AND BUDGET Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty explained, as required, the Business Improvement District (Ed!) submitted their 2017 Work Plan and budget to staff by October 1. Also required is a presentation of their Work Plan and budget to Council and Council acceptance. He introduced Robert Boehlke, President. Mr. Boehlke introduced John Rankin, Treasurer, and Kimberly Koenig, Board Member. Mr. Boehlke identified the volunteer Advisory Board Members: • President - Robert Boehlke, House Wares • Secretary — Jacob Comstock, Comstock Jewelers • Treasurer - John Rankin, Rankin Jewellers • Clayton Moss, Forma • Kimberly Koenig, Rogue • Cadence Clyborne, HDR Engineering • Shubert Ho, Salt & Iron • Apple Catha, Apple Catha Massage Therapy • Kiersten Christensen, Insurance Services Group • Petra Rousu, Savvy Traveler ■ Pam Ehrbar, Contracted Administrator Ed!'s 2016 Work Plan Implementation includes: • Marketing Campaign ■ Holiday Campaign • Umbrella Program • Grant Program • Local Events • Member Engagement & Outreach • Public Restroom Funding • Parking • Professional Business Resources Ms. Koenig reviewed: • Marketing Campaign o Marketing Strategy ■ Launch and build Ed! messaging to increase awareness of Edmonds as a day trip destination for shopping and dining • Utilize media with the most amount of exposure, to encourage recall, and reinforce top of mind — Social, Digital and Transit ■ Support digital search efforts to increase awareness and drive interaction to EdmondsDowntown.org o Transit Ad Campaign ■ Outside of Community Transit and King County buses from Stanwood to Seattle ■ Bonus interior ads o Social Media Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 702 8.4.c ■ Facebook — 6/16/16 — 160 followers — 9/3/16 — 1,001 followers — Increase of 52% • Instagram — 5/21/16 — 5 posts, 88 followers, 20 following — 9/13/16 — 52 posts, 361 followers, 313 following — Increase of 410% o Media Results • Media results throaoh August 2016 Net Cost % Impressions CPM Transit $15,605 59% 6,791,000 $2.30 Digital $6,000 22% 1,539,992 $3.90 Social $5,00 19% ■ Edmondsdowntown.org — Traffic May — June Results — Users up 306% (5369 vs 1321) — Page Views up 207% (13,180 vs 4,287) — 90.7% of users were new • Holiday Campaign o Third annual Holiday Trolley scheduled for the upcoming holiday season o Joint digital marketing campaign with the City of Edmonds — Edmondsholidays.com o Trolley specific digital effort on Facebook and Instagram Mr. Boehlke described: • Umbrella Program o Continued annual commitment to fund this program o Overall positive feedback from Ed members and the public on this program, and is a great icon that identifies downtown Edmonds • Grant Program o Supported a number of Grant requests including: ■ Installation of Walking Map at Edmonds Historical Museum ■ Supported the first Creative Age Festival of Edmonds event ■ Brouhaha event as part of an ongoing series of events that includes numerous downtown Edmonds merchants • Outreach o Ed! volunteers participate in the annual 4ch of July parade o Member Engagement & Outreach ■ At annual meeting, showcased active and completed projects, and solicited member feedback on what projects they felt were most important to them. ■ As in previous events, members shared that marketing was their top priority, followed by parking improvements ■ Monthly e-newsletter keeps members updated on projects, issues of concern and ways to get involved. — Goes out to 535 members and community leaders each month. • Public Restroom Funding o Ed! Contributed $10,000 • Business Resources o Partnered with Chamber of Commerce to host disaster preparedness event for business owners. ■ Speakers from the Red Cross, Snohomish County Emergency Services and the Fire district Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 703 8.4.c ■ Fifty business owners and citizens attended ■ Hope to do more of this type of event in the future Parking o Dedicated to providing support for parking solutions o Engineer hired to draft proposed parking improvements on 4th Avenue ■ Proposed project could increase public safety, add stalls and provide easier parking. ■ Findings shared with City and Economic Development Commission (EDC) o Discussions regarding parking continue, from increased enforcement, better signage and other physical improvements that could help mitigate the effects of increased demand on infrastructure • 2017 Proposed Work Plan o Full Work Plan provided in Council packet o General Work Plan categories: ■ Administration ■ Communication and outreach ■ Marketing/advertising ■ Professional business resources ■ Appearance and environment ■ Ed! Grant program. Mr. Rankin reviewed: 2017 proposed budget highlights o Yearend balance of $67,000 added to total annual assessments of $75,000 = total revenue: $143,154 o Total year-to-date expenses: $64,972 o Balance: $78,183 o Diligent about staying within budget and spending wisely Mr. Boehlke advised Advisory Board meetings are held on the 2°a and 4th Thursday of month at the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Councilmember Buckshnis said bravo on the budget, noting an expenditure for the Washington State Convention was removed from the budget. She recognized the huge surplus and conservative budgeting. Council President Johnson observed Ed!'s second priority was parking and asked whether the Board had discussed where employee should park to allow for more customer parking. Mr. Doherty responded the memo the EDC provided to the City Council and Mayor regarding parking issues was informed by the work Ed! has done. In response, Mayor Earling established an interdepartmental team to work on parking issues; the team includes a representative from Ed! as well as the EDC. Their second meeting will be held tomorrow and will include discussion regarding the employee parking permit zone and its effect on the availability of visitor parking. Councilmember Teitzel recognized Ed! for their work and their presentation. He asked the annual cost of the umbrellas program and the loss rate as well as how Ed! planned to address the use of the stands as trash receptacles. Mr. Boehlke responded new containers will not allow garbage insertion. Mr. Rankin advised the annual cost is approximately $8,000 and there is an approximately 30% loss rate, noting one was recently discovered for sale at Goodwill. Mr. Boehlke commented Ed! does not consider umbrellas to be lost, they are in the communities continuing to market Edmonds. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 704 8.4.c Councilmember Nelson pointed out Ed!'s Work Plan includes pedestrian and vehicle safety. He expressed appreciation for that focus which may include improving crosswalks. One of the Ed! board members is on the pedestrian safety task force and he looked forward to working with Ed! on pedestrian safety. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled business owners in the past have gotten behind in their dues. She asked if there was better cooperation now and how dues in arrears were collected. Mr. Boehlke said Ed! hired people in November to visit all members to get their input on what they need, grievances, etc. A small number of businesses are in arrears. Mr. Doherty explained according to the established guidelines, once a business in arrears, it is handled by the City's Finance Department. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE EDMONDS DOWNTOWN ALLIANCE PROPOSED 2017 WORK PLAN AND BUDGET. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Marlin Phelps, Edmonds, explained over 2 years ago the City turned off his water. The water bill was paid, but his family, including his 78-year old mother, were without water for 6 days. After trying unsuccessfully to get the City to turn his water back on, he turned it on himself and was arrested. The City's Municipal Court Judge dismissed that charge but the City appealed the dismissal to Superior Court. When the Superior Court kicked it back down to the Municipal Court, he told his attorney to appeal to the appellate level, literally an appeal of an appeal at the appellate court, City of Edmonds v. Marlin Phelps. His mother, who was present when he paid the water bill. He has made 11 attempts over 2 months on a motion to have his mother deposed. His mother is now 80 years old, her cancer has returned and she is unable to travel. He was told by the court clerk yesterday that he was put on the docket. He has reached out to Mr. Taraday, Councilmember Buckshnis and Mayor Earling. His mother is a key witness to the defense of something that has already been dismissed for lack of evidence. Any Councilmember could call Judge Coburn and tell her to hear his motion. He needs a video deposition of his mother before she dies. Marjorie Fields, Edmonds, spoke regarding the Fire Department budget. She recognized the Council had studied this issue long and hard but it appeared the study focused more on savings than enhancing services. Edmonds citizens have not asked to save money on fire protection; such budget cuts should not be done without consulting the affected public. Regardless of how it is rationalized, cutting personnel cannot result in better service. She was especially concerned about reduced emergency medical coverage in downtown Edmonds due to the number of older residents who generate emergency call and the importance of response time. She urged the Council to reconsider the planned cuts to public safety. Tom Nicholson, Edmonds, spoke in support of the Mayor's recommendation to modify the FD1 Interlocal Agreement. This reallocation of resources will not jeopardize public safety and is a responsible action for the City budget. This adjustment of staffing will be a major step forward in balancing the public need for emergency medical services and fire safety along with the reality of the City budget. His major concern was the potential property tax increases that would result from the City not acting now to manage ongoing increases in FD1's cost structure. This proposal will reduce the necessity for the City to introduce levies or tax increases that would impact all resident and significantly impact the affordability of living in the best small city in Washington. Michael McConnell, representing the firefighters of Fire District 7 which covers Mill Creek to Monroe, 110 square miles and 110,000 people, urged the Council to take pause prior to reducing service in Edmonds. That service and quality of life is not just dependent on the immediate response in Edmond but has a regional effect. As departments move to the New World response system that has the closest units respond, there is no consideration of jurisdictional boundaries. If each jurisdiction doesn't maintain the Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 705 8.4.c service levels expected by their citizens, it begins to rapidly deplete service in other jurisdictions. As Everett has made similar cuts, Fire District 7 is responding deeper into Everett. Edmonds is a great place to live but it is incumbent on the Council to maintain service levels and to maintain Edmonds' role and leadership in regional service. Kade Johnson, Edmonds, displayed the EpiPen he carries due to a severe allergy to peanuts and tree nuts. If he accidentally eats something with peanuts or tree nuts, his throat swells, making it hard to breath. The EpiPen is the first thing he needs to stop it; the second is for someone to call 911 so an ambulance can take him to the hospital and it is important this all happens as quickly as possible. His mom told him the Council was talking about having less emergency people and voting on a reduction from 1 I to 9; that scared him. He asked what happened if everyone was busy and it took longer for an ambulance to reach him. He does his best to stay safe and avoid peanuts and tree nuts, but it is hard not being able to eat the same things at parties that most kids do. His parents do their best to protect him by telling everyone about his allergies and showing them how to use a EpiPen. He urged the Council to do their best to protect kids like him who really need emergency services to be available quickly. Josh Johnson, Edmonds, recalled hearing in the spring about proposals to cut emergency services and after not hearing about it during the summer, they thought the idea had been dropped. Last week they learned the Council was seriously considering cuts. They also learned last month the Council voted to increase taxes for emergency medical service. One article states the importance of funding lifesaving services and that taxes would be increased by 5.7%, yet the Council is considered cutting these services by 20%. One month the Council voted to raise taxes; the next month they are considering lowering services and cutting staff from 11 to 9. A nationally recognized standard for staffing a city like Edmond recommends 15 EMS; the proposal is to go from I I to 9, a 40% decrease. He was fine with paying more taxes especially for EMS services for his son and others. He urged the Council to carefully consider this decision. Peter Gibson, Edmonds, referred to the math cited by Mr. Johnson, increasing taxes and reducing services is silly and electeds should be able to figure that out. This proposal reminds him of a recent election where he did not think something would happen; this spring there were discussions about reducing services and now he feared the Council would vote to reduce services, a slap in citizens' faces. He recalled talking to Councilmember Teitzel last week who told him the Council was voting to change things, not necessarily decrease services and that FD1 could choose to staff the City the way they want and the City would have to pay for it. He compared that to paying for chuck steak at the butcher shop and asking for prime rib. He referred to comments his mother made last week when he was on shift as a firefighter in Kitsap County regarding his father who passed away in 1997. He was that 4-year old watching her do CPR for 7 minutes, the result of pre-2011 staffing level which it appeared the Council wanted to return to. He urged the Council to vote correctly. Nora Banks, Edmonds, said she and her husband are seniors and her husband has been the beneficiary of not just good, but well delivered service that saved his life twice due to the prompt response. Her husband has suffered two strokes and a heart attack and each time firefighters have gotten him to the emergency room so quickly and so well prepared that they saved his life and he is now healthy and walking around. She did not have statistics, only the request that when considering a reduction in staff, Councilmembers think about the health and wellbeing of the people who voted them into office, think about someone watching their house burn or someone's child that needs emergency care. When making a decision, she urged the Council to keep in mind that the health and safety of citizens must always come first before anything else and to stop seeing so many dollar signs. Erin Zackey, Edmonds, introduced her children Quinn and Hazel, and relayed her mom being a volunteer firefighter in the small town where she grew up gave her a deep respect for firefighters and their Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 7 Packet Pg. 706 8.4.c intense responsibility in the community. Today she and other teachers received annual training on the use of EpiPens because of the number of students who need those service. With the number of schools in Edmonds, she was concerned about efficient response times and having enough responders if there were a natural disaster or numerous incidents occurring at the same time in local schools. A lot of young children have more and food allergies. As a mom, she recognized that reducing lifesaving staff in Edmonds was not appropriate. Her kids can be reckless and she did not want their put lives in jeopardy by not having the needed service available. She urged the Council not to make cuts to Fire Department and to respect and appreciate the service they provide. Leslie Buchanan, Edmonds, said she did not come tonight with politics or numbers, she came with the reality of life and death. Her family has been walking through the valley of shadow of death for about year; Sunday night half the City's fire crew came to their home because they wanted to meet her husband who is awaiting a heart transplant. She was very impressed with how caring the firefighters were and their interest in learning about his situation and how they could assist in an emergency. She was shocked to read in the paper about the proposed cuts and felt compelled to speak to the Council for her husband and others who cannot come to the Council due to health issues. Speaking for those who do not have a voice, she urged the Council not to make these cuts. Jennifer Bardslee, Edmonds, said Edmonds is a wonderful place to live; it has a good reputation as a place for families and retirees. She was willing to pay more taxes if it meant having a well -staffed fire safety program. The Fire Department has assisted them three times, once when her 2-year old locked himself in his bedroom; when both the carbon monoxide detectors went off, and when her child got his finger stuck in the hold in a clipboard. Although these were minor things, at the time, these seemed like big emergencies to her family; firefighters deal with all kinds of emergencies, big and small. She acknowledged older people vote for school levies because they recognize the importance of schools; those older people also rely on emergency services. Todd Zackey, Edmonds, commented on the importance of maintaining the level of EMS service downtown. Highly trained paramedics need to be downtown; City relying on resources from other areas can be troublesome for residents as well as put others areas in jeopardy. Edmonds is in an active earthquake zone and the City needs to be prepared for that; getting rid of critical staff will not help when that occurs. The City is considering a railroad overpass to provide access for emergency services; there need to be personnel to provide those services. He had no problem paying to ensure the services that are needed are provided. At a minimum, the Council should consider giving the community the option to decide rather than the Council making the decision. He encouraged the Council to make the right decision but if they could not, allow citizens to make this important, life or death decision. Erika Strauss, Edmonds, mom, resident, writer, local shopper and diner and earlier this year, a first-time patron of local emergency services. She did not intend to support the local emergency crew; luckily her husband called 911when she passed out on her kitchen floor. A crew of compassionate and phenomenally able first responders whisked her to Swedish -Edmonds where the cause of her fainting was ruled to be an undiagnosed electrolyte imbalance exacerbated by dehydration. Not a big deal but her heart could have stopped if she not promptly and properly rehydrated. Her condition is not difficult to manage but the first time in an aid unit and the emergency room was a wakeup call. Her situation could have been far worse if not for the quick availability and the effective care of local emergency service. She was no sure whether any Councilmembers had been a patient in an ambulance but in her experience, it tends to clarify what you really care about. She reminded elected officials that the basis of community is caring for your neighbor, care, compassion and protection of your neighbors, core values that the local government must protect for Edmonds to maintain its unique and special quality. Nothing is more fundamental to great communities than caring about your neighbors; she urged the Council to do everything in their power to ensure full funding and support of the local emergency services, the very foundation of a community. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 707 8.4.c Mark Batrilla, Edmonds, said he spent 31 years with the Edmonds Fire Department. When he started, there were 12 career firefighters at 1 fire station and 30+ volunteers. Over the years, the department transitioned into a full-time Fire Department. The leadership at that time saw fit to bring advance life support services with Medic 7 into this area which eventually grew to two paramedic units with two paramedics at Lynnwood and Edmonds. It is well known in emergency circles that the best place to have a heart attack is in Seattle; however, the statistics for southwest Snohomish County are even better than Seattle's due to leadership making sure citizens have the best. He urged the Council not to settle for good, but to keep the best. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, recalled speaking several years ago when the Council was considering giving up the City's Fire Department and contracting with FD1. He agreed this was the safest area and did not feel the cost savings warranted reducing service. He recalled early discussions about Woodway and confirmed with an ex-Councilmember that when FD1 came to Edmonds, they were so enthusiastic about selling the contract with the City, they did not feel including Woodway in the cost was important and they were willing to pay the cost. He suggested research may find Edmonds is not obligated to pay Woodway's share. Edmonds' Fire Department serves the community in a very well and citizens feel safe and he did not think Councilmembers wanted to reduce service and increase fear. He has used the Fire Department once and hoped it did not happen again. He joked the Mayor should worry about needing emergency services, commenting they may not be available if he needed them. He urged the Council not to cut emergency services and if they were worried about the cost, they should look into whether the City was responsible for paying Woodway's share. Peggy Farrah, Edmonds, downtown business owner, introduced her son Kristo and said as a former healthcare administrator and non -clinical person, she often made decisions based on numbers and data. Often the nurses and doctors that she managed were opposed to those decisions due to their real -world experience. She was sure the Council had information that convinced them these measures would not pose public safety issues because she was certain the safety of the public was in an elected official's hearts. From her experience, some of the decisions made at the hospital turned out to be the wrong decision; different decisions may have been made had more time been taken to listen to the front-line workers doing the job. She encouraged the Council to take the firefighters' day-to-day experience into account. She recalled in a letter to the editor in My Edmonds News suggesting the Council do ridealongs with firefighters to spend time in the shoes of those delivering the services. She urged the Council to consider that and to take more time to consider other options. Andrew Matheson, Edmonds, commented every time he rides his bike, he puts on a bike helmet; similarly, every time he gets in a car, he puts the seatbelt on and makes sure others in the car are wearing their seatbelts. The chance of getting in an accident are pretty low on any given day, yet he puts his bike helmet and seatbelt on every time. The report prepared by the consultant looked at call volumes and expected outcomes for any given day; with the right budget and the right staffing, those expected outcomes could be met with some margin of error. The report also cites national averages which include a spike/anomaly in the numbers for 9/11. He pointed out the importance of being prepared to respond to that spike which could be the result of terrorism, natural disaster, etc. He summarized it was a mistake to staff based on the accidents that may occur on any given day; instead the City needed to be prepared with the necessary emergency service. Voters have supported these services, speaking with their votes to say emergency service are important to them. He suggested doing more due diligence regarding disaster before making cuts. Tim Hufty, Edmonds, pointed out there were no statistic on people walking into the fire station needing help. Last August his dad visited Station 17 to get his blood pressure checked during the Tate of Edmonds because he wasn't feeling well. He flatlined at the fire station and the firefighters brought him back. If Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 708 8.4.c services are cut and EMTs and paramedics are shifted around so they are not available downtown, he questioned what happened the next time someone walked in needing help. He recognized the electeds have a tough job building and balancing a budget, but figured the last thing they would do would be to cut public safety. He was ashamed and embarrassed and said there are other ways to cut the fat. He questioned the Council raising taxes and then cutting fire service, questioning what was next — raising water rates and telling him he can only use five gallons a day. Edmonds is growing and more services are needed; the Council should look to the future and add firefighters, EMTs and equipment, not make cuts to balance the budget. He was not in favor of raising taxes and preferred the Council figure out to make the money work. As a business owner outside Edmonds, he suggested some fat could be cut from the City's second floor. 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. AWARD OF EDMONDS VETERAN'S PLAZA PROJECT Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite requested the Council award the bid to K-A Construction for construction of the Veteran's Plaza. The Council packet contain a memo outlining previous action, current bids that ranged from $290,000 - $472,000 and engineer's estimate of $285,000. She recalled the Council bids previously rejected bid a few months ago at staffs requests when bids were $450,000 - $700,000. The citizen committee has been working hard to raise money to construct the Veteran's Plaza; to date they have raised $505,000. A donation in the amount of $4500 was received in the last two days as well as commitments for $16,000, reducing the deficit of $67,000 to $47,000. Committee Co -Chair Maria Montolvo has indicated a donor has committed $50,000 if it is needed. The Committee assures they are committed to raising the rest of the funds and would like to have the bid awarded so that construction can begin in January with the project completed in time for Memorial May. Ron Clyborne, Edmonds, Co -Chair, Veterans Plaza Committee, representing the Edmonds Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion and Vietnam Veteran of America, as well as all veterans past, present and future, relayed their excitement about building this park plaza to honor and remember all veterans past present and future. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE EDMOND VETERAN'S PLAZA TO K-A CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZE A 10% MANAGEMENT RESERVE FOR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION. Councilmember Tibbott said after reviewing the drawings, he was impressed with receiving a bid that meets the objectives. He was supportive of the bid award and looked forward to completing the project next year. Councilmember Buckshnis said bravo, recalling the herculean effort to raise $8500 for the K-9 statue. She thanked the veterans and other donors, commenting the plaza will be fabulous and she looks forward to its completion. Mr. Clyborne recalled a Marine Corp saying, "when the going gets tough, the tough get going." The community got it done, and have a plan for any discrepancy that arises. He pointed out fundraising began approximately seven months ago and raised $475,000. Fundraising stopped because it was believed there was enough but was restarted when more money was needed, raising another $45,000. He assured any discrepancy could be handled. Councilmember Nelson commented although he was sure the discrepancy could be handled, but if it couldn't, he was certain the City would find a way to help out. He thanked Mr. Clyborne and all the veterans for their service. He was sorry the Veteran's Plaza could be done sooner and looked forward to its completion. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 10 Packet Pg. 709 8.4.c MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. POTENTIAL ACTION ON THE FIRE DISTRICT 1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Mr. Taraday explained this is a follow-up to last week's presentation. He reminded the Council what the project with Fitch Associates was tasked with considering: • If you were designing the Edmond Fire Department from scratch today, based on the data that you have today, what would you design? • How many firefighters would you plan to employ? • Of those, how many would be paramedics? Factors to consider include: Geography of the City and FD1 o Map identifying the stations that Edmonds pays to operate 16, 17 and 20 and the other FD1 and Lynnwood stations. Type of demand for service o Primary demand is EMS ■ EMS 55.2% ■ EMS-ALS:30.3% • Fire related 9.8% ■ Service 4.6% ■ Special Ops 0.2% Frequency of demand for service o Unit hour utilization by unit analysis indicates using 1/3 of the capacity provided by 11 firefighters in 3 stations today = 0.10 utilization rate 0 0.30 = IAFF standard utilization rate o Consultant concluded actual usage is 0.10%, indicating there is a lot of capacity available in the system Equity among the various neighborhoods o Currently only 2 paramedics for entire City, operating in the same unit at Station 17 o Currently the next closest paramedics are at Lynnwood Station 14 and Mountlake Terrace Station 19 o Takes only one paramedic call to completely wipe out paramedic services in the City ■ If two heart attacks happen at the same time, the second one waits for either Lynnwood or Mountlake Terrace to respond o Under Mayor Earling's recommended proposal, Alternative 2, paramedic proximity improved with one paramedic located at Stations 16, 17 and 20 as part of a cross -staffed unit ■ Allows for the possibility of three dispatches requiring a paramedic capability ■ Paramedics often double dispatched, but it is not always necessary - Dispatcher can decide whether double dispatch necessary Means to evaluate the service over time o Utilization of 0.25% at any one of three station is the threshold to trigger negotiations with FD1 to bring utilization rate to a more reliable rate. Cost (last but not least) o $1.36 million difference in cost between current staffing and the recommended proposal Mr. Taraday explained the issue of cost is frustrating for the City and probably for FD1 because neither party is fully in control of what they pay firefighters because are subject to interest arbitration which means FD1 cannot say how much they will pay firefighters. FD1 does not have the same ability to control costs that a typical employer has; under State law, labor unions such as IAFF have a lot of power to set Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 11 Packet Pg. 710 8.4.c compensation levels according to what other agencies are paying. As a result, it costs a lot to maintain a Fire Department. Mr. Taraday highlighted the proposed action: • Motion to direct City attorney to bring back for final action an ILA that contemplates use of Fitch Alternative 2. o ILA not ready for approval yet; FD1 and the City still have work to do. o Helpful for both negotiating teams to get direction/confirmation that the Council supports the proposed alternative staffing model ■ If the Council does not support the proposed alternate, that will change the negotiations. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO BRING BACK FOR FINAL ACTION AN ILA THAT CONTEMPLATES THE USE OF FITCH ALTERNATIVE 2. Councilmember Mesaros commented tonight the Council heard testimony from citizens about the importance of emergency medical services. He supports the proposal because it increases EMS services, increasing from two paramedics to three. Several audience members commented on how quickly emergency services arrived and he pointed out if that were a paramedic call, a second call may have to wait for a unit from Lynnwood or Mountlake Terrace; this solve that problem. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled in 2009 Lora Petso, Adrianne Fraley-Monillas and she were citizen advocates opposed to selling the City's Fire Department to FD1. They were later selected to assist with selecting the consultant who would help the Council understand. FD1 Commissioners have said they will sever the contract with Edmonds if Edmonds does not pay Woodway's share of the cost. A very diligent and pragmatic process has taken approximately 14 months to complete. The Fitch report is a fresh set of eyes. FD1's report, done in February 2016, says about the same thing as Fitch's report. If citizens are interested in a public safety levy, she will lead that charge, commenting that is what should have been done in 2009. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said one of objections when the previous Council and Mayor sold the Fire Department was that the cost would eventually be higher. Although it was easy to say the savings was only $1.36 million, she questioned where cuts could be made to provide those funds — police, roads? She pointed out certain revenue sources must be used for certain expenditures. Fire and Police are paid from the General Fund, a huge cost to the City. The first -year savings are $1.36 million. FD1 firefighters haven't negotiated their contract this year and she expected costs to increase next year. The City needs to have some control while still providing a good or same level of service that has been provided in the past. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked who Mr. Taraday has been negotiating with and whether it was with the labor union or the FD1 Commission. Mr. Taraday answered the negotiating team was two FD1 Commissioners, FD1 Chief, Assistant Chief and FD1's attorney. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked who negotiated with the union. Mr. Taraday answered FD1 leadership. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the FD1 Commissioner had discussed Alternative 2 with Local 1828. Mr. Taraday answered he did not think there had been a formal conversation, certainly union membership was aware of the proposal. FD1 does not need union permission to make this change. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed there was potential that staffing issues, layoffs, etc. could be addressed during FD1 and Local 1828' negotiations. Mr. Taraday answered when FD1 and the union bargain a contract, many issues are considered, not the least of which is compensation. He reiterated compensation was driven by comparable fire agencies. FD 1 may have aspirations to pay a certain amount, but in the end under State law they pretty much have to pay what the comps show. Although the City is Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 12 Packet Pg. 711 8.4.c limited in increasing the levy 1%/year, the interest arbitrators are not limited and can and do award more than a 1% increase in compensation. The system is set up in a manner that costs will exceed revenue. For Councilmember Fraley-Monillas, Mr. Taraday said under the City's current arrangement with FD1, the City pays for certain minimum staffing levels. FDI can assign additional staff to the Edmonds stations but that does not commit Edmonds to pay for the additional staff. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if FDI would need to return to the City if they decided to add staff to the Edmonds fire stations. Mr. Taraday said he watched the FDI Board meeting on Wednesday; it is extremely unlikely that the Board would assign staff to Edmonds stations without Edmonds committing to pay for it. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was disturbed by the lack of communication between the Commission and their labor union, envisioning this may not have been as dramatic if there had been better communication. Councilmember Tibbott requested staff describe the increase in the EMS levy, where those funds come from, how they are used, and why that is not enough to cover the current level of service. Finance Director Scott James responded the 2017 EMS levy is $3,9790,000; the cost for EMS services far surpasses that levy amount. The EMS levy cannot be raised without a vote. Councilmember Tibbott observed approximately $4 million is the most that can be raised via the EMS levy and the additional amount comes from other sources. Mr. James said the cost of Alternative 1 is $7,400,000 which includes fire service, Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, apparatus replacement, etc. As Mr. Taraday indicated, approximately 85% of the services provided are EMS. Applying that 85% to the total cost, approximately $6 million is for medical -related responses. Councilmember Tibbott summarized taxes have been raise the maximum allowed by law. Mr. James agreed, they had been raised to the maximum amount without a vote. He explained EMS is limited to $050/$1000 assessed value by State law; the 2017 levy will be approximately $0.48/$1000 which is still not enough to cover EMS services. Councilmember Tibbott referenced the tax increase voters in Snohomish County approved for fire protection. Mr. James explained FDI citizens approved an increase; Edmonds is not in FDI so that increase does not affect City residents. Residents of Esperance are affected by the increase as are other properties in FDI outside of Edmonds. Councilmember Tibbott observed the new ILA with FDI would allow the City to receive funds from Esperance to offset costs. Mr. James said the $7.4 million includes all costs for the three stations, less the EMS taxes generated by the Esperance area, $1,117,000. The remainder, $4,727,000 is paid by the City of Edmonds. Mr. Taraday pointed out under the original agreement with FDI, 13.08% of the three -station cost was allocated to Esperance; if that were applied to the new levy amount, the $1,117,000 the City receives to offset the cost via the Esperance property tax revenue would not be enough to pay for 13.08% of the status quo system delivery model, essentially meaning Edmonds would be subsidizing Esperance fire/EMS services. Under Alternative 2, the property tax revenue received from Esperance more or less equals the 13.08% share. Councilmember Tibbott asked about the revenue source for the former Medic 7 stationed at Stevens Hospital. Mr. James answered it was his understanding it was the EMS levy and compensation from the partner cities. He offered to email Councilmembers that information. Councilmember Teitzel pointed out there have been comments that service in Edmonds will be cut but it was his understanding there will be no cuts; the 2 FTEs from 11 to 9 would be reallocated elsewhere in FDI. Mr. Taraday agreed, pointing out FDI operates 12 fire stations, 3 of which are in Edmonds. It was his understanding there is enough need in the employment applicant pool that the proposed changes could be absorbed elsewhere in FDI and there would not be any layoffs. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 13 Packet Pg. 712 8.4.c Councilmember Teitzel asked about FDI's plans to reallocate those two position and whether they would possibly allocate one to the Mountlake Terrace fire station thereby improving response time on an ALS call in the Lake Ballinger area. Mr. Taraday relayed his understanding Station 19 currently has 3 firefighters on duty at a time. He asked if Councilmember Teitzel's question was whether FD1 might increase that to 4. Councilmember Teitzel answered possibly. Mr. Taraday answered the discussions with FD1 leadership have not gotten into that level of detail. FD1 is the expert on how to deploy crews. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the two reallocated firefighters could potentially be used to improve mutual aid response from a station outside Edmonds to an Edmonds call. Mr. Taraday said he could not speculate regarding how FD1 would reassign those firefighters. Edmonds will not lose any paramedics, the two existing paramedics will be in different units and a third paramedic will be added. Councilmember Teitzel observed when the original FD1 model was developed, Woodway was part of it. In January 2014 Woodway joined Shoreline Fire and their call demand was shifted to Shoreline. He asked if the departure of Woodway created excess capacity especially in Stations 17 and. Mr. Taraday did not know how much call volume was associated with Woodway but whatever that volume was, its absence represents a reduction in demand. Councilmember Nelson pointed out there are currently three paramedics on duty in the City of Edmonds at times, one at Station 20 and the two at Station 17. Mr. Taraday agreed that occasionally happens. Councilmember Nelson commented because he likes to do his homework, he met with FD1 Chief Reading, Lynnwood Fire Chief Cockrum, rode on the fire rescue boat and fire engine 16 and responded to multiple medical calls. He toured the City's oldest and most populated buildings, learning their unique risks to fire danger. He researched the National Fire Protection Associations standards and even the consultants' reports for other cities. The Council may think the consultant give them everything they need to know to make cuts but he questioned what they really knew about the information presented like the recommendation to remove the downtown fire engine and have less firefighters at night, the graph that indicates most emergency calls do not happen at night. For example there are very few fire calls at night. He looked this up and compared it to the national average and it matches. However, something the consultant's graphs do not show that the national graph do is that although 20% of all fires happen at night, they account for 52% of all home fire fatalities. He questioned whether the Council really wanted to downgrade the fire service from a report that downplays fire dangers and suggested telling that to the families of the four people who died in fires in Everett last winter, the mother who lost her three children to a fire in Centralia this March, the 15 business owners in downtown Bothell who lost everything this summer. Councilmember Nelson continued, the City's firefighter are heroes, but they are not superheroes; they are mere mortals called upon to do extraordinary tasks. They cannot do their job to protect us with one hand tied behind their back. One person can do CPR chest compressions 120 times/minute for only so long before they physically tire out and have to stop; stopping means death. Another person has to replace them; it is a physically demanding job to save lives. Our firefighters cannot keep us safe if they do not have a sufficient amount of people and equipment. So are we really enhancing our fire services. The International Association of Fire Chief's website has webinars on best practices and new developments from experts. He listed titles of webinars, Track Fire Department Training with a Purpose, Statistical Methods in Fire Service, Community Risk Reduction, Critical Success Factors for Fire and Rescue Leaders, Must -Have Policies for Every Fire Department, Fire Prevention Risks in Local Communities and Critical Questions Every Fire Chief Should Ask Their City/County Managers, a webinar by the consultants, Stephen Knight and Bruce Moeller, where they state the most important questions for a fire chief involve understanding the economic and political realities facing your agency, understanding the economic motivators for requests for efficiencies, developing a framework for navigating the economic realities of change in your agency. He pointed out that was who the Council was basing the type of fire Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 14 Packet Pg. 713 8.4.c service the community needs; their job is to give cities cover to make cuts. That is why it matters how the problem is framed. Councilmember Nelson said if the Council thinks we should operate as a business, which some Councilmembers do, then looking for efficiencies is perfectly logical. The Finance Director says this makes good business sense. The fire consultant looks for return on investment and the City Attorney cite financial savings. But if the Council is looking for efficiencies as part of a business model, every city department would fail looking through that lens. As a professor of economics in Forbes Magazine recently wrote, does it makes sense to run government like a business? The short answer is no. Efficiency in the private sector means profit. The problem is that not everything profitable is of social value and not everything of social value is profitable. The Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corp, Police Department, Fire Department, libraries, parks, public schools are social value yet they could not exist if they were required to be profitable. Imagine maintaining the military by selling subscriptions door-to-door. Profit is the realm of business while unprofitable but socially useful tasks are the responsibility of government. Somewhere along the way the Council has forgotten what its role is. The Council's function is not maintain a profit for shareholder; its role is to protect citizens from all injuries however small, large, likely or unlikely. It has always been expensive to save lives and it always will be. Councilmember Nelson continued, there is a reason the City Council is tasked with this choice, not the FD1 board, not the fire chief, not the consultants. The Council must decide the level of safety for the community, how much a life is worth to protect. He asked whether this proposal was really the best way forward for fire service. He believed it was not and believed cutting the number of firefighters and having only three emergency vehicles available instead of four was very risky. He believed increasing demands on the paramedics and sharing with neighboring cities will not benefit Edmonds. He believed not holding FD l administration accountable to respond to emergencies with the minimum amount of people within a specific time like every other city in the country is inexcusable. He believed Edmonds could do better, find a better way to pay for the best fire service the City can afford. He believed the Council should prioritize saving lives over saving money and hoped the Council would join him in opposing these cuts. Council President Johnson recalled testimony about families concerned about protecting their loved ones and concerns about safety and agreed safety was the number one priority. As her parents aged, she called the Fire Department on several occasions, many times because she needed assistance picking her parent up from the floor and fortunately four trips to the hospital that were considered basic life support. One dreadful call required advanced life support and every second meant the difference between life and death. She appreciated the work firefighters do and she was a happy customer. Having said that, she believed having three paramedics cross -trained with firefighters was better than one two -paramedic team. For that reason she will support the proposal with the idea it will be monitored and possibly there could be a levy in the future or a different combination of personnel. Councilmember Buckshnis said she wished Councilmember Nelson was here in 2009 when the City sold the Fire Department. She emphasized there was a reopener in the ILA. Although Fitch found there was an underutilization, FD1 is doing a good job. If the City maintains the status quo, FD1 Commissioners have said they will sever the contract. The City and FD1 both had reports prepared and both say about the same thing. If the community is interested in a levy, she will help. She noted one of the issues was firefighters want a 72-hour work day and some Councilmember do not support that. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER NELSON VOTING NO. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. Councilmember Nelson left the meeting at 8:59 p.m. 8. STUDY ITEMS Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 15 Packet Pg. 714 8.4.c 1. FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) UPDATE Senior Planner Kernen Lien explained this is a briefing on the FEMA FIRM which identify flood plains throughout Snohomish County. The limited amount of flood plains in Edmonds are identified in the maps continued in Exhibits 1-4 in the Council packet. He displayed a sample FIRM that includes the Edmonds Marsh and the near waterfront area. The existing maps were established in 1999; FEMA is updating the maps following studies of the flood plains through Snohomish County. The City's flood plains are primarily along the shorelines. A coastal flood hazard study along the Snohomish County shoreline had 36 transects. Transect locations and density based on: • Shoreline characteristic • Shoreline direction • Nearshore bathymetry • Wave dynamics • Land use and development He displayed a Coastal Analysis Modeling Comparison, guidelines for coastal flood hazard mapping and analysis for Pacific Coast of the United States January 2005, highlighting the old approach and new approach for analysis method, wind data, water level model, wave model, topography and study resolution. He pointed out the old approach to topography and establishing contours was USG Contour Maps and the new approach is LiDAR data. Mr. Lien displayed an aerial of Existing and Updated Flood Plain Comparison — Waterfront Area created by overlaying GIS layers on the map. He identified old and new flood plains, explaining the old maps did not establish a base flood elevation, 100-year flood level. The new maps establish base flood elevation: 12 feet in the near waterfront area. He displayed an aerial of Existing and Updated Flood Plain Comparison — Shell Creek area, identifying flood plains on the old and new map and noting the flood plain in this area was reduced to only the mouth of Shell Creek. He displayed an aerial of Existing and Updated Flood Plain Comparison — Lake Ballinger, advising there were no changes to the flood plain around Lake Ballinger in Edmonds' jurisdiction. FEMA will open a four -month appeal/comment period in January/February to gather any other technical information regarding base flood elevation. A public meeting will be held in Everett in January/February on the flood plain maps. A bigger issue in Snohomish County and the nation that does not affect Edmonds is dikes and what do behind the dikes. Staff does not believe any of the information in the updated flood maps is incorrect or needs refinement. Tonight's presentation to Council is information only. Councilmember Mesaros referred to page 239 of the Council packet, a map illustrating the Edmonds Marsh, and asked if global warming and sea level rise in 20-40 years had been taken into consideration. Mr. Lien said the map update did not look out that far. It does take into consideration wave action; he pointed out areas with a 16-foot base flood elevation and the 12-foot base flood elevation, commenting the higher base flood elevation is an area subject to more wave action. The map will continue to be updated periodically. Councilmember Mesaros commented a new community center is being built on the waterfront; most new buildings are expected to last 50 years. He recalled the Council approved plans that raised the elevation 2 feet but feared that may not have been enough. Mr. Lien recalled the evaluation of sea level rise arose during the Shoreline Management Plan update; no new information regarding sea level rise has been developed recently. The policies regarding sea level rise state the City will stay abreast of the issue. One of the studies this spring with Sustainable Cities is evaluating the impacts of sea level rise on the near waterfront area. Councilmember Mesaros commented sea level rise also had the potential to impact the wastewater treatment plant. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 16 Packet Pg. 715 8.4.c For Councilmember Tibbott, Mr. Lien explained the 12-foot base flood elevation is a 100-year flood event which means a 1% chance in any given year of a flood event of that level. Councilmember Tibbott recalled the senior center is at 14 feet. Mr. Lien identified the senior center in the 12-foot base flood elevation area. Councilmember Tibbott recalled the Council added 2 feet. Mr. Lien explained changes made during the CAO update included requiring all structures within the coastal flood hazard area to be built 2 feet above base flood elevation and a change to the definition of height allowing the zoning height to be measured from 2 feet above base flood elevation. For Councilmember Tibbott, Mr. Lien identified the old mapped flood plain and the expanded base flood elevation on the new FIRM. Councilmember Buckshnis observed daylighting of Willow Creek would impact flood control. Mr. Lien responded daylighting will not impact the identified flood plain area. The mean higher high tide for Puget Sound is approximately 10 feet; 100-year flood event is 2 feet above that. Daylighting Willow Creek would not impact that. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the Edmonds Marsh acting like a sponge and able to absorb more would have an impact. Mr. Lien answered given this is in the coastal flood hazard area, water from Puget Sound will cause flooding. Wetlands will absorb water from Willow Creek and Shellabarger Creek. In coastal flood hazard areas, flooding is a combination of those sources. Council President Johnson referred to the map with Edmonds Marsh and asked if flooding in this area occurred only once in 100 years particularly at Dayton & SR-104. Public Works Director Phil Williams answered those statistics are projected using historical data and it is unknown how accurately that will predict the future. Council President Johnson asked if he had seen more than one flooding event in that area during the six years he has been with the City. Mr. Williams acknowledged rainfall events have been more frequent and more intense than what the historical record projects. That is different than flooding events which may be short and intense and create localized flooding. Council President Johnson commented the systems are related. She observed the flood gate is closed six month of the year to prevent flooding. Mr. Williams acknowledged there was interest in having tighter control on the flood gates, including developing criteria for their use, possibly installing motorized valves, etc. Those issues will be considered during the detailed design of Willow Creek daylighting. Currently the flood gates are closed and opened on dates certain which has generally worked well. Finer control and more accurate predictions based on forecasts, etc. would be helpful. Council President Johnson commented there was information available that could be used such as tide charts, phases of moon and weather forecasts. She expressed interest in looking at that issue in greater detail. Mr. Williams agreed it would be during the design of the Willow Creek daylighting project. Council President Johnson inquired about the status of the lift station in the parking lot. Mr. Williams answered there are two lift stations in this area and a third will be added with the stormwater pump station at Beach Place. Lift stations do not necessarily cease to function in a flood but they could; it is not ideal to have water flooding the pump stations. Council President Johnson summarized there is a lot of water in this area from streams, stormwater, etc. and the buildings are vulnerable. The new waterfront/senior center will be built at elevation 14, 2 feet above its current elevation but that is next Puget Sound's 13- foot base flood elevation. She asked the relationship between 13 and 12-foot base flood elevations. Mr. Lien pointed out the sea wall along the waterfront; development of the community center will include additional work in that area. The primary difference between the 13- and 12-foot base flood elevations is 13 feet is out in the water versus in the landward area. He pointed out an area to the south with a 16-foot base flood elevation including wave action. Council President Johnson looked forward to the information the students will produce related to climate change. She asked the timing of that relative to the FIRM. Mr. Lien said the 4-month comment period Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 17 Packet Pg. 716 8.4.c will open in January/February. FEMA will respond to comments, issue the maps in fall 2017 and they will be effective in early 2018. He did not expect the flood plains in the waterfront area to change much. 2. PRESENTATION OF A TIB GRANT FOR CONSTRUCTION FUNDING FOR THE 76TH AVE & 212TH ST. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Public Works Director Phil Williams thanked Council President Johnson for her service as Council President this year. He explained there are two projects, 1) rebuild the intersection creating more geometry to accommodate concurrent left turns to increase efficiency, and 2) working with two other cities and the Verdant grant to construct bike lanes on 761h from 220`h to 2001h. The two projects will be bid in one package this spring. When the project was put out to bid last year, a limited number of bids were submitted and the bids were higher than the available budget and the engineer's estimate. Staff subsequently applied for and received a TIB grant for $2.245 million. Funding for the project is $9.07 million; $6.05 million or 73% of the total project cost will be provided by 3 grants — the TIB grant, approximately $4 million from the original federal grant and $460,000, the City's share of the Verdant grant. The Utility Funds will pay most of remaining cost due to installation of new stormwater, water and sewer facilities within the project limits. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE A TIB GRANT FOR CONSTRUCTION FUNDING FOR THE 76TH AVENUE & 212Tn STREET INTERSECTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Nelson was not present for the vote.) 3. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE FOR HISTORIC INFORMATION PANELS Councilmember Teitzel commented the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) has been working on this for approximately two years. The HPC's focus is preserving the memory of what Edmonds once was through both designating historic buildings for designation on the historic register as well as identify/preserving historical places. As the City recently celebrated its 125'h anniversary, the HPC felt it important to focus on the waterfront area which was heavily populated with mills in the early years. None of the mills remain and the waterfront is now occupied by parks restaurants and the marina. The HPC developed a concept to place an informational panel on the south end of Sunset Avenue with a historic picture taken about 1900 showing what the waterfront looked like. The photograph, attached to the Council packet as Exhibit 3, shows mills at work emitting smoke and steam and a steam locomotive northbound on the tracks. The panel would be installed at the approximate location where the historic photo was taken along the southern end of Sunset Avenue, allowing the viewer to compare the current scene with the scene approximately 100 years ago. A second panel would be mounted in the Yost Park in front of a well-preserved old growth cedar stump that still bears the springboard notches used by the logging crew, featuring a photo of a two man crew manually felling a giant cedar while standing on spring boards as well as a photograph of horse-drawn carts bringing the logs to the cedar mill on the waterfront. The photograph of the horse drawn cart is taken in front of the Housewares store and Chanterelle's building. Each panel costs $4900 to produce and mount; in-house labor will be used to install the sign. Arts & Culture Program Manager Frances Chapin will take the lead on the project. The exhibits in the Council packet are drafts and he anticipated the text would be refined. The panels would be a great addition to the City, an opportunity for the Council to gift them to the community to help preserve the memory of early Edmonds. He requested Council approval of an expenditure of $9800 from the 2016 Council Contingency Fund. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 18 Packet Pg. 717 8.4.c COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE THE EXPENDITURE OF $9800 FROM THE 2016 COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled hearing about this project from former Councilmember Petso. Although she generally approved of the panels, she suggested it should be reviewed by the Planning Board and/or Arts Commission for placement, size, etc. before Council approval of the funding. She noted allocating $10,000 to this project because there was money left over was not a good use of the City's funds. Further, it was not a gift to the community, it was the citizens' money. Until this project went through the proper channels, she foresaw better uses for $10,000 such traffic calming. Councilmember Buckshnis said she liked the idea, but a few citizens have contacted her inquiring about size and use of sustainable materials. She agreed further process may be necessary before it is funded. Councilmember Teitzel said he met with Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite, Ms. Chapin, Arts Commission Vice Chair Samantha and Senior Planner Kernen Lien to discuss the need for consistency with other signs such as the diorama of the Olympic Mountains at Marina Beach. These signs would be similar in size and design. He assured Ms. Chapin would be cognizant of consistency of the design, minimizing the cost, ensuring the correct placement and ensuring the signs are not obtrusive. Councilmember Tibbott said he had no problem with allocating the funds followed by Planning Board review. It was his understanding the project had already vetted through cultural services and the Art Commission. He sees the project as an exciting way to preserve the City's history. He supported approving funding for the project followed by opportunity for additional review and feedback. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND TO ALLOCATE FUNDS NOW, BRING THE SIGNS BACK THROUGH THE PROCESS AND BRING BACK TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION. Council President Johnson did not support the amendment. As a regular visitor to Yost Park, she felt a sign of that nature would be out of proportion and scope; it is a very natural area with a map with numbers available on a handout. That could be done for pennies, saving $5000 She concluded a 60-inch sign would be obtrusive. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked Council President Johnson if she wanted this vetted by the Arts Commission. Council President Johnson answered that was a possibility, recalling cross -approval have been done such as the Stages of Time which was developed by the Arts Commission and presented to the HPC for approval. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas assumed the Planning Board consideration would following the Arts Commission's review and would include consideration of the size, placement, code requirements, etc. AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING NO. (Councilmember Nelson was not present for the vote.) COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ONLY THE PANEL SHOWING THE SAWMILLS. Council President Johnson recalled three locations were under consideration for the sign containing the photograph of the sawmills and suggested the location needed to be confirmed. She was opposed to having a panel in Yost Park. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether the Planning Board and/or Arts Commission could determine the location and size. Council President Johnson answered the Planning Board is also the Parks Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 19 Packet Pg. 718 8.4.c Board so it would be appropriate for them to consider the sign. She supported further review by the Arts Commission and Planning Board, concluding the idea was good but it needed further study. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why Yost Park was selected versus another park. Councilmember Teitzel answered Ms. Hite and Parks Maintenance Supervisor Rich Lindsay and he toured Yost Park to find a suitable cedar stump. There is an extremely well preserved stump in Yost Park that would be outstanding for this purpose. He acknowledged there could be stumps elsewhere in Edmonds although Mr. Lindsay was not aware of them. It would be a great experience for a passerby to see this photograph and the stump in its natural state instead of going to the Museum. Ms. Chapin is the lead on this project; she will ensure the signs are appropriately sized and vetted. AMENDMENT FAILED (1-5), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING YES. (Councilmember Nelson was not present for the vote.) Council President Johnson commented there is a cedar stump with springboard notches in City Park. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (5-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING NO. (Councilmember Nelson was not present for the vote.) 4. COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND EXPENDITURE TO EDMONDS VETERANS PLAZA FOR $4,000 Councilmember Buckshnis commented several Councilmembers have veterans in their families and one Councilmember is a veteran; it is appropriate for the Council to provide support for the project. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE $4,000 FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND FOR THE EDMOND VETERANS PLAZA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Nelson was not present for the vote.) 5. STUDENTS SAVING SALMON FOR 5 733.25 METER OR $5 800 FROM COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUNDS Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Students Saving Salmon's (SSS) report on page 369 of the Council packet. The new meter will collect turbidity data which the old meter does not; the old meter will still be used as a back-up. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE $5800 FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FOR STUDENTS SAVING SALMON TO PURCHASE A METER. Councilmember Tibbott asked how often the equipment would need to be replaced, relaying his understanding that parts needed to be replaced annually. Joe Scordino said there is a three year warranty. Councilmember Tibbott asked if additional equipment will need to be purchased. Councilmember Buckshnis answered SSS would like to do additional testing; the SSS received a $1000 discount on the meter. Councilmember Tibbott expressed his support for the motion, commenting it was remarkable how involved the students are and the important service they are providing to the City. The City is getting a tremendous bang for the buck and involving future generations in the health of the City. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Nelson was not present for the vote.) 9. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 20 Packet Pg. 719 8.4.c Councilmember Tibbott reported the Housing Task Force meeting included a presentation by the Affordable Housing Alliance. He offered to make the presentation available to Council, commenting it provides data that will help Edmonds make decisions for the future. Councilmember Mesaros reported the Public Facilities District (PFD) Board meet with the Edmonds Center for the Arts Board in a joint retreat on December 3 to discuss the future of both entities and how they could better work together. He anticipated a briefing on the retreat at Friday's PFD Board meeting. He was unable to attend the SNOCOM Board meeting; Assistant Police Chief Anderson attended in his place. He plans to attend the SNOCOM/SNOPAC Task Force meeting tomorrow where there will be an update on the potential merger. A joint meeting of the SNOCOM and SNOPAC Boards is planned on January 4 where a more formal update will be provided. Councilmember Teitzel reported the Long Range Financial Planning project has been placed on a brief hold while staff focuses on the budget. He reported on the well -attended World Cafe sponsored by the Diversity Commission which included discussion of real life scenarios related to diversity and inclusion. Councilmember Buckshnis reported the Tree Board is planning their 2017 schedule. Each Tree Board member went to Tree University and received diplomas which qualifies the City for a bonus award from Tree City USA. Three application were received for one Tree Board vacancy and one alternate position. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported the Diversity Commission meeting included discussion regarding questions for the World Cafe as well as about the election. She encouraged the public to attend Diversity Commission meetings which are held the first Wednesday of the month from 6 to 8 p.m. She reported the Health District Board met several times during the past month; a decision was made to sell the building in Everett. The District uses only half the space and approximately $2 million in repairs are needed. made. The District's intends to purchase a smaller building to house only the Health District. She also attended the Housing Task Force meeting. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported Mr. Williams, Mr. Doherty and he were in Washington D.C. on Thursday and Friday last week. They had an opportunity to meet with Congressman Kilmer who lives on the Kingston side; the Edmonds at -grade crossing project impacts residents who live and work on that side. They also met with Congressman Larson who has been an advocate for grade separation, Senator Cantwell, and the lead transportation person in Senator Murray's office as well as with the Federal DOT to provide a better understanding of Edmonds' project as well as getting important feedback on the grant process and funding prospects in the next 1-2 years. Mayor Earling thanked the Council for not having meetings the next two Tuesdays, a welcome break for everyone. He wished citizens and Councilmembers a very compelling and gratifying season. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained Councilmembers on the dais are bundled up because the heat from the large number of audience members during the last two meetings activated the air conditioning. She reported on her visit to the cold weather shelter last week where 37 people were sheltered, 30 men and 7 women. The cold weather shelter is held at the Edmond Senior Center when temperatures reach 34 degrees is sponsored by 5 churches. She spoke with several of the people at the shelter, learning the cities they are from and the issues that bring them to Edmonds. When she left at about 9:30 after everyone had a hot meal, visited and began going to sleep, the temperature in her car was 27 degrees. She wondered where those 37 people have been if not for the shelter or where they would have found shelter if the temperature had been above 34 degrees. She was told by one of women that the shelter is the only safe Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 21 Packet Pg. 720 8.4.c place she can sleep because men and women are separated at the cold weather shelter which is not done at most other shelters. She thanked the churches who provide food and supervision of the people at the cold weather shelter and wished everyone a Happy Holiday. Councilmember Buckshnis wished everyone a Happy Holiday, to be safe and to enjoy the time off. She thanked Council President Johnson and Council President Pro Tern Mesaros for their service. She looked forward to next year, commenting her focus will be on the wonderful things happening locally because things are confusing at the national level. Council President Johnson said it had been an honor to serve as Council President and she was delighted to be done at the end of 2016. She wished everyone a Happy Holiday. Councilmember Teitzel congratulated the Seattle Sounders on winning the championship. He expressed well wishes for the police officer injured at today's parade. He wished everyone a Happy Holiday and to have a great time with loved ones. Councilmember Mesaros wished everyone the best during this wonderful season, time to be with family and friends and to enjoy the goodness that life has given. Councilmember Tibbott extended special thanks to Verdant for the grant for the walkway/bike lane on 76`h Avenue, a great recreational opportunity as well as improved safety. He wished everyone great peace and joy during the holiday season. He looked forward to a great 2017 and opportunities to meet citizens. 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 14. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:03 p.m. 4. r DAID. EARLING, MAYOR Sri/�� AO �w .. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 22 Packet Pg. 721 8.4.d edmonds ARTS COMMISSION MINUTES June 5, 2017 The Edmonds Arts Commission: dedicated to the arts, an integral part of community life. City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department PRESENT: Suzy Maloney Kevin Conefrey STAFF AUDIENCE Lois Rathvon Lesly Kaplan Frances Chapin Tanya Sharp Marni Muir Jonathan Walzer —S Rep Excused: Beverly Shaw-Starkovich The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM by Suzy Maloney, Chair INTRODUCTIONS — MINUTES —5/1/17 minutes—Conefrey Moved, Kaplan Seconded, Approved. AGENDA —Add On the Fence as A.5; Informational Panels as A.6; Meeting dates as C.2. REPORTS - A. Creative Programs 1. Cascadia Art Museum — Commissioners discussed the benefits of having the Guy Anderson painting Two Workman on display at the Cascadia Art Museum and endorsed the idea of extending the loan agreement another year. Conefrey Moved and Kaplan Seconded to extend the contract another year, Approved. If there is any change in plan for exhibit location for the piece the Museum will inform EAC and staff before moving it. Public Art Brochure — A proposal was reviewed for design of a new one page three fold public art brochure. Commissioners agreed that this smaller format featuring just the outdoor pieces in the City Collection is a good direction for a walking tour piece. Staff will arrange to meet with the designer and get a contract in place with the intent of having new brochures by mid -summer. Summer Concerts — Chapin will email out the schedule once City Council sign-ups have been completed and a reminder about process, including picking up the box earlier in the week and introductions. Staff is creating a flyer for the Music at the Library series that will be handed out at the Sunday concerts. Look for the flyer in the concert box. The first concert is July 9. 4. Tourism Promotion Awards for 2018 — Muir summarized the recommendations of the review committee which consisted of Muir, Sharp and Rathvon, facilitated by Chapin. The 2018 awards reflect an increased allocation of LTAC funds with a total $21,000 in the following distribution: CSO $2,000; OBT $2,600; EAF $1,700 (includes $1,200 for Studio Tour and $500 for Festival); Edmonds Driftwood Players $2,400; Sno- King Chorale $1,500; Demiero Jazz Fest $2,500; Art Walk Edmonds $2,000; Cascadia Art Museum $2,500; Rotary Jazz Connection $2,200; and Phoenix Theater $1,600. Maloney Moved and Conefrey Seconded recommendation to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee to approve EAC allocations in the final budget, Approved. S. On the Fence — A new proposal by Minh Carrico was reviewed and the Commission asked if it could be installed in late summer on the Anderson Center fence. They noted that the picture showing the shadow should be part of the title and artist statement signage. Muir Moved and Rathvon Seconded that the Packet Pg. 722 8.4.d Edmonds Arts Commission Draft Minutes - 6/5/2017 2 proposal be approved for the fence on Main Street, with schedule to be determined after discussion with the artist, Approved. 6. Informational Panels —The City Council requested Planning Board review for the Waterfront Mills and Yost Park Old -growth Stump informational panels. The concept and information has been previously reviewed by both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Arts Commission. The Commission reviewed the new proposed drafts, panel sizes, and locations. Conefrey Moved and Muir Seconded that the two draft informational panel designs, dimensions, and proposed locations be recommended for approval at Planning Board and City Council, Approved. B. Capital Projects C. Funding & Administration 1. Economic Impact Study Update— Maloney and Sharp reported on the first meeting of the Advisory Group workshop with Berk consultants regarding the two proposed surveys, one for attendees and one for organizations. They reported that there was excellent input from the group and the group had broad representation and interests. Chapin and Sharp reported on doing a pilot test of the survey at the Waterfront Festival on Saturday. Discussion ensued about how best to gather surveys at the Arts Festival. Ideas for a drawing were discussed. The ECA will be sharing a booth and will allow EAC to use it as a base for doing surveys. Muir, Maloney and Walzer may be available to help with surveys during the Festival and Chapin will be reaching out for other volunteers trying to cover a couple of hours on each of the three days. Information will be sent out after the Arts Festival for general promotion of the attendee survey, requests for volunteers, and information to organizations about the organizational survey that will be requested from all the arts and culture nonprofits and businesses with a specific focus on the arts. Meetings— Chapin noted that there will not be a quorum for the July 3 meeting. After discussion it was proposed that the meeting be moved to later in July, July 17 probably. If there is no business for the August meeting, it will be canceled. STAFF REPORT —.Chapin is starting work on the 2018 budget and will present a draft at the July meeting. The WOTS brochure is in process. NEW/OTHER BUSINESS — AUDIENCE COMMENTS - Meeting Adjourned at 7:05 PM Packet Pg. 723 8.4.e INFORMATIONAL PANELS: WATERFRONT & YOST PARK • City Council funding approval -December 13, 2016 • Requested Planning Board review • Concept/design approvals by Historic Preservation Commission and Arts Commission - 2016-2017 • Final review of design, dimensions and proposed sites by Arts Commission - Approval June 5, 2017 • Planning Board review - Approval June 14, 2017 with two recommendations r a Packet Pg. 724 8.4.e WATERFRONT INFORMATIONAL PANEL Dimensions: 60" long x 18" wide, attached to angled bracket sign post T r_ CIO r_ 0 E L 0 4- 0 2 L O �_ This photograph was taken at the turn of the 20th century from = approximately the same location where you are standing. Cell Originally a dense forest, the 18905 saw Edmonds transformed into an industrial center. The waterfront became an unbroken line of saw mills v running round the clock, turning old -growth cedars, hemlocks and firs into shingles, lumber and building materials shipped to markets from 0 Alaska to California. By the end of World War II most of Edmonds' forest had been cut, and the mills began to close. The last sawmill shut down in 1951. Although hardly a trace now remains of the mill industry that y dominated the waterfront in that era, old -growth tree stumps are still E visible from trails in Yost Park. Q Waterfront saw mills in Edmonds ca.1910. Photo courtesy V V of Edmonds Historical Museum. r C a� E t IC r a Packet Pg. 725 8.4.e Waterfront Panel Proposed Site Location: Sunset Walkway Near Bell Street EM T 8.4.e Waterfront Panel Proposed Site Location: S u nset Wa I kway N ea r Be I I Street 8.4.e YOST PARK INFORMATIONAL PANEL Dimensions: 30" long x 18" wide, attached to angled bracket sign post ro Qe: f .s sa CU 1 0 'rr E A few large stumps like this one showing notches from logging at the turn of the 20th century 4- are still visible from trails throughout Yost Park. The Edmonds area once supported a dense oLd- c growth forest dominated by Western Red Cedar and Western Hemlock. When the area was settled •L by non- indigenous people in the mid-1800s, there were trees up to 700 years old, 230 feet tall and o 13 feet in diameter. These Large trees kept the forest floor in perpetual shade, creating a space for y the variety of plants and animals that flourished in the understory and forest floor. _ The 1870s saw the beginning of systematic clearing of Edmonds' old -growth forest by loggers using hand tools. The Loggers who cut trees were called "fallers." Using their axes, they cut notches in the trunk for springboards which they stood on while felling the tree with a crosscut saw. Horses and oxen teams were used to skid logs to the waterfront mills where they were converted to shingles 0 and other Lumber products and shipped by rail or water to markets from Alaska to California. By 1910, Washington was the nation's Largest Lumber -producing state. c 1 Moving logs on Main Street ca.1910. Photos courtesy of Edmonds Historical Museum. a G Packet Pg. 728 s- #�` ' o i TRAIL ENTRANCE Mmay* `-✓� .'_�' -` $ us� .. • { f �,:.. � �r _� � r � � City Council and Planning Board Comments/Recommendations 8.4.e Sustainable product? - Material is weather resistant CU custom high pressure laminate used elsewhere with good results and fabricator environmentally responsible company, Greenguard certified, Forest Stewardship .L Council certified, using recycled and renewable y resources. r N C O r R Locations are flexible, waterfront panel could be U) relocated in future. E Information on each panel references the focus of the other panel with regard to early logging industry. Packet Pg. 731 8.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Tree Board Appointments (15 min.) Staff Lead: Shane Hope, Director Department: Development Services Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History The Citizens Tree Board was created by action of the City Council in 2010. The Board's role is established under Chapter 10.95 EMC. (See Attachment 1.) This chapter was last amended earlier this year to clarify and update the Tree Board appointment process. Prior to that, new appointments and reappointments could not be finalized, consistent with the city's code. Staff Recommendation Make and confirm remaining Tree Board appointments. This should be done in the following manner: 1. Each Council member who has not made her/his specific Tree Board appointment in 2017 should announce an appointment (preferably, based on the existing list of appointments - attached). 2. The full Council should vote to confirm the appointments. Narrative The updated appointment process in Chapter 10.95 EMC calls for each Council member to appoint a Tree Board member for the duration of the City Council member's term. In addition, the Council President may appoint an alternate for the duration of his/her term as President. Each appointment is then subject to Council confirmation. Term limits no longer apply to Tree Board positions, so any Tree Board member can now be appointed or reappointed to as many terms as desired. In 2017, two Tree Board appointments were made: Frank Caruso by City Council Member Kristiana Johnson and Gail Lovell as alternate by Council President Tom Mesaros. Neither position was confirmed, in part because Chapter 10.95 had not been amended at that time to have a clearer appointment process. (Note: The old code's language for the appointment process was somewhat confusing and included term term limits that would not have allowed at least one Tree Board member to continue.) A list has been prepared to show the current Council members paired up with each corresponding Tree Board member, position by position. (See Attachment 2.) The position matches are based on the history of previous appointments. At this time, six Tree Board members (i.e., all except Position 1) need to be appointed and announced by individual City Council members. Then those six appointments, plus the two Tree Board positions that were appointed in 2017 (namely, Position 1 plus the Alternate) need to be confirmed by a Council majority. Packet Pg. 732 8.5 On the one hand, City Council members are not required to appoint the current Tree Board members that correspond with their positions. On the other hand, Tree Board members now informally serving have been doing so voluntarily and in good faith. Attachments: Att. 1: ECC Chapter 10.95 Edmonds Tree Board Tree Board Agenda Memo Attachment - Chart of CM and TB Members - updated 7-12-17 Packet Pg. 733 8.5.a Edmonds Chapter 10.95 CITIZENS' TREE BOARD Page 1 of 2 Chapter 10.95 CITIZENS' TREE BOARD Sections: 10.95.010 Board created— Membership. 10.95.020 Officers of board — Meetings — Forum. 10.95.030 Powers and duties. 10.95.010 Board created — Membership. A. There is hereby created a citizens' tree board consisting of seven members plus one alternate and one nonvoting, ex officio position to be filled by an Edmonds city council member. Board members must be Edmonds residents. It is recommended the board include citizens from throughout the city (representing different watersheds and neighborhoods). Additionally, those with professional or hobbyist interest/experience in urban forestry, horticulture, and habitat enviroscaping are preferred; these may include arborists, botanists, horticulturists, native plant experts, master gardeners, wildlife experts, and related. B. Each councilmember shall appoint one tree board member to a term the duration of which shall coincide with the term of the appointing councilmember. Each of the seven tree board positions, numbers one through seven, will be appointed by the councilmember holding the respective position number, one through seven. The alternate member shall be appointed by the council president to a term the duration of which shall coincide with the term of the council president. All appointments must be confirmed by a majority of the full city council. Newly elected councilmembers may reappoint an existing tree board member or alternate member or may appoint a new member in the sole discretion of the individual councilmember. Where a councilmember is appointed to fill a vacant council seat, that councilmember may only appoint a person to the tree board if the tree board position associated with that council position becomes vacant. C. There shall be no term limits. Should a vacancy occur on the tree board, a new member shall be appointed by the council position that previously appointed the vacant position on the tree board for the remainder of the councilmember's term. [Ord. 4067 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 3875 § 1, 2012; Ord. a 3807 § 1, 2010]. c m 10.95.020 Officers of board — Meetings— Forum. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Members of the board shall meet and organize by election, from the members of the board, a chair Q and vice chair and other officers as may be determined by the board. It shall be the duty of the chair to preside at all meetings. The vice chair shall perform this duty in the absence of the chair. Four members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. If four regular members are not present, the alternate member may fulfill the quorum requirement for that meeting and vote accordingly. Otherwise, the alternate may not vote. The board shall meet regularly on the first 'he Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4069, passed May 16, 201 1 Packet Pg. 734 8.5.a Edmonds Chapter 10.95 CITIZENS' TREE BOARD Page 2 of 2 Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. at the Edmonds city council chambers. [Ord. 4067 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 4034 § 1, 2016; Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010]. 10.95.030 Powers and duties. A. The board is empowered to: advise and make recommendations to the mayor and city council and, as appropriate, to the planning board and other boards or commissions of the city on such matters including but not limited to: 1. An urban forest management program and/or ordinances to help preserve and protect existing trees, encourage planting of additional trees, safeguard trees on parcels where construction or renovation is occurring or planned to occur, and encouraging the Edmonds citizenry to become active stewards of the urban forest. 2. Increasing community outreach and education regarding the value of trees, proper selection of trees, and correct methods for planting of and caring for trees. 3. Working with civic, religious, and citizen groups on specific projects or to organize invasive plant removal and native vegetation planting in accord with the department of parks, recreation and cultural services. 4. Facilitating relevant grant applications supporting ecology and watershed protection projects. 5. Sponsoring an annual Arbor Day event. 6. Working towards achieving and maintaining a Tree City USA® status. B. The board shall provide an annual report to the city council within the first quarter of each year. [Ord. 4067 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 4034 § 2, 2016; Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010]. Q c m E U a r r Q 'he Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4069, passed May 16, 201 1 Packet Pg. 735 8.5.b EDMONDS CITIZENS' TREE BOARD MEMBERS as of July 1, 2017 CC COUNCIL CONFIRMATION COUNCILMEMBER POSITION COUNCILMEMBER TB POSITION TREE BOARD MEMBER APPT DATE(S) DATE(S) TERM EXPIRATION DATE(S) 1 Kristiana Johnson 1 Frank Caruso 1/10/17 12/31/17 2 Mike Nelson 2 Albert (Jed) Marshall 12/31/17 3 Adrienne Fraley-Monillas 3 Doug Petersen 12/31/17 4 Diane Buckshnis 4 Bill Phipps 12/31/19 5 Dave Teitzel 5 Barbara Chase 12/31/19 6 Thomas Mesaros 6 Steve Hatzenbeler 12/31/19 7 Neil Tibbott 7 Vivian Olson 12/31/19 Council President Sitting Council President* Alt Gail Lovell 1/10/17 sits for one year Term Expires 12/31/17 Council Liason: Councilmember Buckshnis *Appointed by: Council President Mesaros on January 10, 2017 \\edmsvr-userfs\userprof$\ spellman\Documents\Jana\Tree Board Agenda Memo Attachment - Chart of CM and TB Members - updated 7-12-17.docx ti N ti m a L E a� m H c �a U 4- 0 r L t U c m E t r r Q 0 E m 2 R c a� a� a E L R 0 m W L f+ d E t v R Q Packet Pg. 736 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 07/18/2017 Council Committee Reports (10 min.) Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative This is an opportunity for the Council to report on items discussed in their committee meetings. The committee meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: FC062717 PPP062717 FC071117 PPP071117 PSP071117 Packet Pg. 737 9.1.a FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING June 27, 2017 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Dave Teitzel Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev./Comm. Serv. Dir. Council President Thomas Mesaros Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Mayor Dave Earling (intermittently) Jeannie Dines, Recorder The meeting was called to order at 8:19 p.m. in Council Chambers. Resolution of Intent to Designate Highway 99 Subarea as a Residential Targeted Area Mr. Doherty explained this is the beginning of the process to designate the Hwy 99 Subarea as a Residential Target Area for implementation of the Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) to encourage residential development. Steps for approval are, 1) Council expresses in a resolution its intent to designate the area as a Residential Target Area and sets a public hearing, 2) the public hearing is held, and 3) the Council considers designating the area via a second resolution. Minor code amendments will be required to add the Hwy 99 Subarea. The intent is to have the Hwy 99 Subarea Plan, code provisions, transportation revisions, EIS and the MFTE approved at one Council meeting He recommended forwarding the resolution to the July 18 full Council agenda to inform the public of the public process. Mr. Doherty clarified MFTE is intended to encourage desired redevelopment in pursuit of approved plans as development occurs and that includes affordable housing; the program does not ensure that development in its entirety will be affordable housing. Discussion followed regarding the process and MFTE in Westgate. Action: Schedule as action item for full Council on July 18. 2. April Monthly Financial Report Councilmember Teitzel recalled at the previous meeting, the committee discussed establishing policies for various funds and asked about next steps. Mr. Turley suggested inventorying existing policies first. Council President Mesaros suggested establishing a system for categorizing policies first. He suggested researching other cities' systems and refine to fit Edmonds. Councilmember Teitzel recalled Lynnwood had a good model. Mr. Turley said it would not be a quick project but it was doable. Councilmember Teitzel asked about status of the facility condition report. He was particularly interested in the Boys & Girls Club building and programmatically what it can provide and the investment necessary to bring it up to code. He relayed the Historic Preservation Commission feels it should be retained and possibly moved. Discussion followed regarding adopting policies via resolution versus ordinance, process for developing policies, establishing a reserve policy, and the date of the audit exit conference. Mr. Turley responded to questions regarding the April Financial Report and offered to research questions for which answers were not readily available. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the pie chart of sales tax analysis by category, pointing out 54% of the City's sales tax comes from 3 sources which illustrates the need to diversify. ti N 0 U U- r c a� E CU a Packet Pg. 738 9.1.a 06/27/17 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 3. Miscellaneous Councilmember Teitzel requested the analysis that was done when the City changed from having its own library to joining the Sno-Isle Library System. He raised several issues such as the possibility of the library becoming obsolete over time, whether the library is the highest and best use of that building, whether another use could occupy the library building, whether it is better for the City or Sno-Isle to operate the library, and Edmonds' per capita contribute to Sno-Isle compared to other cities in the system. Councilmember Teitzel submitted a list of questions. Action: Committee members Teitzel and Buckshnis meet with Council/Legislative Assistant Pierce to develop a plan and forward it to City Council for their approval The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Q Packet Pg. 739 9.1.b PARKS, PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING June 27, 2017 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Phil Williams, Public Works Director Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev./Comm. Serv. Dir. Mayor Dave Earling (intermittently) The meeting was called to order at 8:20 p.m. in Jury Meeting Room 1. Report of final construction costs for the Citywide Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) Sewer Rehabilitation Project --Hwy 99 Pipe Rehabilitation Phase Mr. Williams reported the final project cost was $114,432 including a one change order amounting to a net change of $5,692. Construction was completed on time and under budget. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 2. Presentation of a Supplemental Agreement with David Evans & Associates for the 76th Ave & 212thSt. Intersection Improvements Project Mr. Williams reported an excavator fell into the construction hole today; the excavator operator suffered only minor injuries. Marshbank Construction is investigating the cause. The supplemental agreement with David Evans & Associates will provide an additional budget of $40,000 for construction support services, plus an additional $10,000 management reserve. This amount is within the overall budget for the project. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda. 3. Carnegie Library Building Lease Addendum Mr. Williams explained the City has had a lease with the Edmonds Museum since 1976. This addendum extends the lease for five years with an optional extension and adds a clause that the museum is the exclusive lessee which will assist them in obtaining grants. The rate, maintenance responsibilities, operating responsibilities stay the same. Councilmember Johnson pointed out because the building is on the historic register, any additions/changes made to the land or building require a certificate of appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). She requested that requirement be added to the lease. Discussion followed regarding the City's and the Museum's responsibilities, the cost of maintaining the building, and items in the building that need repair such as the pergola, parapet, and windows. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda with the addition of, "Any modifications that the City authorizes need to be considered by the HPC for a certificate of appropriateness." 4. Resolution of Intent to Designate Highway 99 Subarea as a Residential Targeted Area Mr. Doherty explained the Council approved implementation of the Multifamily (Property) Tax Exemption (MFTE) program in the Westgate area following the subarea planning process. The MFTE program is intended to encourage desired redevelopment in areas where redevelopment is planned. Packet Pg. 740 9.1.b 06/27/17 PPP Committee Minutes, Page 2 As part of the Hwy 99 Subarea Plan, staff recommends doing the same for that area. The first step is adopting a resolution of intent to designate the Hwy 99 Subarea as a Residential Target Area for implementation of the MFTE and schedule a public hearing on August 15. Following the public hearing, a second resolution is required to designate. Minor code amendments will be required to add the Hwy 99 Subarea. The intent is to have the Hwy 99 Subarea Plan, code provisions, transportation revisions, EIS and the MFTE approved at one Council meeting. He recommended scheduling this as an action on the July 18 Council agenda to inform the public of the public process. The Finance Committee concurs with that recommendation. Discussion followed regarding percentage of the subarea that is residential, uses allowed on Hwy 99, MFTE incentivizing residential development, 12-year exemption the Council approved requiring 20% of units be in the affordable range and developers' interest in using MFTE in the Hwy 99 Subarea. Action: Schedule resolution as action item on July 18 on full Council agenda. 5. Proposed Noise Ordinance Mr. Williams reviewed revisions to the ordinance in response to Council input: • More clearly referenced the criteria • Developed a policy detailing criteria and method for granting a noise exemption • Sample exemption application He anticipated further exemptions for working at night will be needed for the 76th/212th project. The committee requested at the conclusion of a project staff inform Council the number of night work exemptions that were granted and any complaints that were received. Action: Schedule as action item for full Council The meeting was adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Packet Pg. 741 9.1.c FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING July 11, 2017 Elected Officials Present Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair) Councilmember Dave Teitzel Staff Present Scott James, Finance Director Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Jeannie Dines, Recorder The meeting was called to order at 7:26 p.m. in Council Chambers. Second Quarter 2017 Budget Amendment Mr. James relayed: • 14 decision packages 0 5 previously reviewed 0 9 new • Approximately $136,000 in new revenues • Approximately $282,000 new expenditures • Approximately $146,000 in ending fund balance will be used Mr. James reviewed the budget amendments: • New: o Annual software maintenance for the Government Access Channel programming o Additional consultant plan review of building permits due to increases in permitting activity o Additional $1,000 in 2017 Diversity Commission staff budget to cover delayed invoice o Use of vendor fee receipts for 2017 Holiday Market professional services o Use of sponsorship receipts for 2017 Puget Sound Bird Fest professional services o Transfer of funds from Non -departmental to Parks & Recreation for payout of retiring employee o Insurance reimbursement for traffic controller damaged in a vehicle accident o Preliminary design of a replacement retaining wall within right-of-way - $16,400 o Stormwater educational programs for students and businesses as part of the City's Stormwater Permit compliance efforts Previously discussed by Council: o Fund temporary Administrative Assistant position while employee on maternity leave o Corrections to Lodging Tax Fund line items for professional services o Additional expenditure Frances Anderson Center Bandshell - $32,000 o Additional $71,000 spending authority for Veterans Plaza o Budget correction related to transfers from the Utility Operating Funds to the Bond Fund Mr. James responded to questions regarding budgeted 2017 beginning and ending fund balance, Fund 421 revenue versus expenditures, projects that will utilize outside consultant plan review, and use of increased permit revenue to fund outside consultant plan review. Action: Schedule for 15 minutes for full Council on July 18 or 25 2. May Monthly Financial Report Mr. Turley reviewed the May Monthly Financial Report, highlighting the following: a Packet Pg. 742 07/11/17 Finance Committee Minutes, 9.1.c e2 • General Fund revenues similar to 2016 • Utility revenue and expenses lower than 2016 due to delays in grant billing • Fund 112 - $3.6 million 2017 compared to under $1 million 2017 • Building permit revenue $295,000 in 2016 versus $332,000 in 2017 • Investments revenue is up • Interest income for June is over $100,000, $325,000 YTD Mr. James distributed Review of Sales Tax by Category and a graph of the top four sales tax categories (retail automotive, contractors, retail eating and drinking and miscellaneous retail trade). He and Mr. Turley responded to questions regarding REET revenue expectations, campus safety revenue in May 2017, traffic infraction penalties revenue May 2016 actual versus May 2017 budget, the City's loan to the PFD and the PFD's financials, long range task force, and reserve funds. Mr. Turley provided a brief update on the audit, advising the auditors have not identified any findings. They have raised questions regarding the loans to the Street Fund and to the PFD. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 3. Library District Councilmember Teitzel remarked times are changing and a great deal of information is available on the internet. He questioned whether the current library model fit the way information is evolving and whether it is the most financially reasonable. Mr. James distributed and reviewed the Library Annexation Agreement the City entered into in 1998 which requires the Library District to set aside funds in years 1-3 totaling approximately $1.1 million. The contract states use of the funds must be mutually agreed to by the District and the City. Approximately $300,000 was used for the roof repair. He suggested researching that reserve fund as well as researching Edmonds' residents' assessments to determine if Edmonds is subsidizing other cities in the Sno-Isle System. Councilmember Teitzel expressed interest in reviewing the proforma if one was prepared when the decision was made to join Sno-Isle. Action: Council/Legislative Assistant Andrew Pierce to research and provide a report within 4-6 weeks. The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. a Packet Pg. 743 9.1.d PARKS, PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING July 11, 2017 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Phil Williams, Public Works Director Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Rob English, City Engineer Council President Tom Mesaros (intermittently) Tom Lindberg, Murraysmith Jerrie Bevington, Recorder The meeting was called to order at 7:27 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room. Committee members agreed to add the following agenda items: Possible Traffic Calming Devices on Olympic View Drive as Item 5 and Pathway for Implementation of the Climate Resolution as Item 6. Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan Tom Lindberg, Murraysmith, provided an overview of the 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan, He described a recent change to update the plan every 10 years rather than every 6 years, 20-year planning horizon with focus on first 10 years, benefits of the plan, and chapters in the plan. He described water use efficiencies, unaccounted-for water, water system evaluation, system improvements to be done during the planning period and accomplishments since 2010, estimated cost of the improvements, financial plan, total annual improvements, financial plan, and comparison of Edmonds' rates to other cities/districts. Next steps include Planning Board public hearing July 12, City Council public hearing July 18, submittal to Department of Health and adjacent water systems for comment, staff's response to comments and Council adoption later this year. Mr. Lindberg and Mr. English responded to committee questions regarding water sufficiency during the 20-year period, location of the Alderwood supply station, replacement of undersized watermains, previously approved rate increases, when the 10-year time period begins (upon approval by Department of Health), when watermain replacement program began (2011), lifespan of replacement pipes, replacement of 1 % of pipes per year, declining water usage, demand model and population forecasting, system leaks, other systems' unaccounted-for water, and water usage reduction goals. Action: Public hearing at July 18th Council meeting. 2. Presentation of the City of Edmonds' Water Use Efficiency Program for 2017 Mr. Williams explained the City is a member in Everett Water Utilities water conservation program and follows their recommendations. Staff recommends adopting the 2017 Water Efficiency Program and forwarding it to the State of Washington for approval. He responded to questions regarding educational efforts. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 3. Presentation of Utility Easements and Temporary Construction Easements at 7521 212th St. SW and 7525 212th St. SW for the 76th Ave. W Cc_ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements Project Mr. English advised during construction, a Frontier duct bank encased in concrete was discovered in the same alignment of the joint utility trench (JUT) on the north side of 212th, east of 76th that was not Packet Pg. 744 9.1.d 07/11/17 PPP Committee Minutes, Page 2 part of the design plans. The property owner has agreed to an additional utility easement and temporary construction easement; the total compensation is $10,500 which will be funded by revenue from traffic impact fees. He commented on the complexity of the intersection and potential for a future request for an additional easement for a PUD vault. Mr. English responded to questions regarding the project contingency and Council acceptance of the easements. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 4. Discussion Regarding "Newspaper" Boxes in Public ROW Mr. Williams distributed photographs of "newspaper" boxes in the right-of-way and described problems such as boxes tipping over and creating litter, boxes not well maintained, lettering/signs on the boxes that do not comply with the sign code and boxes detracting from the aesthetics of the area. The courts have ruled consistently on behalf of free speech; locations cannot be regulated unless there is a safety issue (blocking sight lines, driveway, etc.) and excluding them from a certain location requires another nearby location be available. He responded to questions regarding whether the boxes could be regulated via the sign code, inability to regulate the box's content, establishing standards for box maintenance, and commercial speech the boxes provide. Action: Confer with Rob Chave due to his familiarity with the sign code and obtain a legal opinion from the City Attorney 5. Possible Traffic Calming Devices on Olympic View Drive (OVD) Mr. Williams preferred improved signage, solar powered lighting, etc. and did not recommend installing speed humps on an arterial. Discussion followed regarding existing signage on the OVD curve, revisions made last year to the traffic calming program to include arterials, effect of radar speed signs, discomfort of pedestrians on OVD, assumption many of the speeding motorists live in the area, speed studies that identify areas eligible for traffic calming, plans to move radar speed signs and purchase more signs and poles, and potential improvements for the curve such as a light. Action: Staff consider solutions. 6. Pathway for Implementation of the Climate Resolution Councilmember Tibbott inquired about the pathway for implementation such as budget, cost projections, impact on the Comprehensive Plan, etc. Discussion followed regarding renewable energy versus consumption, whether City government or all Edmonds residents would be required to use renewable energy, how City government could force private parties to purchase renewable energy credits from PUD, converting emergency generators from diesel to a renewable source, electricity the City currently purchases annually and directors identifying the impacts of the resolution. Mr. Williams relayed Mayor Earling requested Shane Hope consider the resolution from a sustainability standpoint and develop a cost estimate. Action: For future discussion. The meeting was adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Packet Pg. 745 9.1.e PUBLIC SAFETY & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING July 11, 2017 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Mike Nelson (Chair) Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Phil Williams, Public Works Director Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager Andrew Pierce, Council/Legislative Asst. The meeting was called to order at 7:25 p.m. in the Police Training Room. Custodial Services Interlocal Agreement with Town of Woodway Mr. Williams reviewed the proposed Interlocal Agreement with the Town of Woodway for Edmonds custodial staff to provide twice monthly custodial/cleaning services for the Woodway Town Hall. The net result is positive to the City, providing funds for overtime for "deeper dive" cleaning project on Edmonds City buildings. Mr. Sullivan described Woodway's Town Hall, staff's willingness to provide the services, and the agreement of the union. Discussion followed regarding Woodway's current janitorial services, staffing capacity to provide custodial services to Woodway and the term of the interlocal. Committee members requested staff provide the PSP committee a report in one year. Action: Forward to Consent Agenda; staff to provide a report to the PSP Committee in one year. 2. Cell Phones for Council (added at the request of Councilmember Fraley-Monillas) Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed the Snohomish County Council and Health District Board have business cell phones and their attorneys recommend not texting, taking work calls or forwarding work emails to personal cell phones. In Edmonds, police officers, department directors and managers all have City cell phones. She recommended Councilmembers be provided City cell phones for public disclosure purposes. Discussion followed regarding the cost, establishing a policy that Councilmembers use City cell phones for City business, concern with carrying a second cell phone, staff's cell phone policy, and whether Councilmember cell phones needed internet access. Action: Direct staff to draft a policy and determine the cost. The meeting was adjourned at 7:41 p.m. Packet Pg. 746