Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2016-04-05 City Council - Full Agenda-1639
Agenda Edmonds City Council . ,HyCOUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 APRIL 5, 2016, 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 1. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 22, 2016 2. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of January 26, 2016, February 9, 2016, February 23, 2016, and March 1, 2016. 3. Approval of claim checks #219083 through #219179 dated March 24, 2016 for $385,169.60 (reissued check #219125 $130.00) and claim checks #219180 through #219314 dated March 31, 2016 for $454,672.86 (reissued check #219282 $123.60). 4. February 2016 Monthly Budgetary Financial Report 5. Authorize the Mayor to Sign Funding Agreement with Public Hospital District No. 2, Snohomish County, Washington to Provide the 2016 Health & Fitness Expo 6. Authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with BHC for Dayton St. Utility Replacement (3rd to 9th Ave) 7. Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Murray, Smith & Associates for Five Corners Reservoir Recoating 8. Authorization to award a construction contract for the Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Project to Insituform Technologies Authorization to award a construction contract for the 191st Street SW and 216th St. Drainage Improvements Project to AGR Contracting 10. Budget Authorization for Federal Lobbyist/Strategist Services 11. Confirmation of Appointment of Vivian Olson to the Citizens' Tree Board 4. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS 1. Community Transit Choice Connections Award Presentation 2. Planning Board Update 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing to determine the eligibility of the First Baptist Church of Edmonds listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. Civic Field Street Vacations 2. Critical Area Ordinance Update Edmonds City Council Agenda April 5, 2016 Page 1 8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS 10. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.100(1)(1). 11. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. 12. ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda April 5, 2016 Page 2 3.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 22, 2016 Staff Lead/Author: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Initiated By: Staff recommends that Council review the draft minutes and approve them on the Consent Agenda. Attachments: 03-22-16 Draft Council Meeting minutes Packet Pg. 3 3.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES March 22, 2016 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT J. Robinson, Police Officer Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir. Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADD TO THE AGENDA FOLLOWING ITEM 6A, A BRIEF PRESENTATION ON THE CIVIC FIELD STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. APPROVAL OF DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RETREAT MINUTES OF MARCH 4-5, 2016 B. APPROVAL OF DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 15, 2016 C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #219014 THROUGH #219082 DATED MARCH 17, 2016 FOR $714,060.70. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT #86940 THROUGH #87164, PAYROLL CHECKS #62104 THROUGH #62112 FOR $484,343.83, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 4 3.1.a BENEFIT CHECKS #62113 THROUGH #62117 AND WIRE PAYMENTS OF $544,787.80 FOR THE PAY PERIOD MARCH 1, 2016 THROUGH MARCH 15, 2016 D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM ALEXANDRE C. AND KATY B. ARAUJO ($400.00) 4. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS A. 2015 ANNUAL REPORT - SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 1 Fire District 1 Commissioners present: Jim McGaughey (Chair), Jim Kenney, David Chan, Bob Meador, and Richard Schrock. Fire District 1 staff present: Brad Reading, Interim Fire Chief; Doug Dahl, Interim Assistant Chief; Bob Eastman, Assistant Chief, Shaughn Maxwell, Deputy Chief, Kevin Dowling, Acting Deputy Fire Marshal; Kathleen Junglov, Finance Director; and April Richards, Executive Assistant to the Board of Fire Commissioners. Interim Fire Chief Brad Reading recognized Chief Ed Widdis, and described his background; he started at age 13 with the explorers in Fire District 7, hired as a firefighter by Fire District 11 in 1980, worked through the ranks and became fire chief of Fire District 1 in 2004. During his tenure, he participated in multiple mergers and contracts including Fire District I and 11, Mountlake Terrace, Brier and Edmonds. He is now working as a consultant and transitional employee for Fire District 1, assisting with the search for a new chief and other large projects. Interim Chief Reading commented the windstorm on August 30, 2015 was the busiest day in Fire District 1's history with over 250 incidents that day including a house fire in Edmonds at 185th and 82" d caused by a generator. Deputy Chief Shaughn Maxwell provided 2015 highlights with regard to emergency medical services: • Community Paramedic Program o Following a 2 year pilot program, Verdant renewed their grant of over $1 million to expand community paramedic program o Edmonds receives the greatest amount of service from the program o Average age served 74 o Community resource specialist added to focus on falls and CPR training for the public • Awards o Award for the highest cardiac arrest save rate in Snohomish County. o Honored as one of the top 10 EMS innovators in the world for the second time Assistant Chief Bob Eastman provided 2015 highlights with regard to training and preparedness: • Oil rail transportation risks and preparation training and drills • Active shooter response training with law enforcement • Increasing wildland interface capabilities • Expanded community preparedness education and programs: o CERT o Map Your Neighborhood o Ready Sunday ■ Coordinating with Westlake Chapel Acting Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Dowling provided 2015 highlights with regard to: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 5 3.1.a • Fire prevention: o Significant incidents and investigations — total loss $783,400 o Inspections (hours) ■ New business: 384 ■ Target hazards: 31 ■ Re -inspection: 284 ■ Engine Company inspections: 580 ■ Division in sections and actions: 28 ■ Total plan review hours: 397 o Permits ■ Construction permits: 535 ■ Special event/tank removal operational permits: 63 o Major projects ■ Swedish/Edmonds ambulatory care center ■ Post office ■ Prestige Care ■ Salish Crossing ■ Woodvale Neighborhood • 2015 Community events o Edmonds Egg Hunt o Edmonds Waterfront Festival o Edmonds 4 h of July parade and waterball competition o Taste of Edmonds o Tree Lighting o Delivery of food and gifts to needy families o Post fire neighborhood meetings o Sister City tour o Car seat checks at Station 17 o Bike helmets available at all stations • Upcoming events o EMS open house on May 21 with activities for families and seniors Interim Assistant Chief of Operations Doug Dahl reviewed the Compliance Report based on standards the City Council adopted in 2009 as required by SHB 1756: • Response by call type o Emergency Medical Services: 81 % o Service Call: 4% o False Alarm: 5% o Fire: 2% o Good Intent: 6% o Hazardous Conditions: 2% o Other: 0% • Total incidents in the City 0 2012: 4,576 0 2013: 4,804 0 2014: 4,718 0 2015: 5,291 • Total incidents by Edmonds stations o Station 16 (196`h & 84t) ■ 2011: 1,345 ■ 2012: 1,346 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 6 3.1.a ■ 2013: 1,435 ■ 2014: 1,328 ■ 2015: 1,447 o Station 17 (downtown): ■ 2011: 1,650 ■ 2012: 1,539 ■ 2013: 1,634 ■ 2014: 1,486 ■ 2015: 1,526 o Station 20 (Esperance): ■ 2011: 1,954 ■ 2012: 1,935 ■ 2013: 1,973 ■ 2014: 2,042 ■ 2015: 2,146 • Graph of calls by time of day o Call volumes peak during the day and drop off at night in FD1's service area including unincorporated Snohomish County, Brier, Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace • Total turnout time: Better than standard o Standard: 2:45 minutes on 90% of all calls o Actual 2015: 2:39 minutes • First arriving fire engine on fire response: 19 seconds off standard o Standard: 6:30 minutes travel time for arrival first engine on 90% of fire calls o Actual 2015: 6:49 minutes o NOTE: Edmonds has never met this standard • Residential fire deployment of full first -alarm assignment: Did not meet standard o Standard: 7:45 minutes travel time for arrival of all first -alarm response vehicles and personnel (15 firefighters) on 90% of residential fire calls o Actual 2015 ■ Incident 1: 7:00 ■ Incident 2: 8:00 ■ Incident 3: 8:22 ■ Incident 4: 9:00 o All incidents had firefighters on the scene within 1-3 minutes. Firefighters began mitigating the emergency as soon as they arrive. This element measures the last arriving unit at a house fire. The predictable consequences for this element (last arriving unit) are inconsequential as the first arriving units have the greatest impact on these events. • Commercial fire deployment of full first -alarm assignment: Did not meet standard o Standard: 9:00 minutes travel time for arrival of all first -alarm response vehicles and personnel (19 firefighters) on 90% of commercial fire calls o Actual 2015: ■ Incident 1: 8:00 ■ Incident 2: 6:00 ■ Incident 3: 7:16 ■ Incident 4: 9:00 ■ Incident 5: 14:00 • Basic Life Support (BLS) response: Standard achieved o Standard: 5:15 minutes travel time o Actual 2015: 5:15 minutes • Advanced Life Support (ALS) paramedic response: 4 seconds off standard o Standard: 6:45 minutes travel time Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 7 3.1.a o Actual 2015: 6:49 minutes Technical rescue and hazardous materials response: No incidents reported Response time for marine rescue and personnel: 1:24 minutes better than standard o Standard: 6:30 minutes for arrival o Actual 2015: 5:06 minutes Recalling Councilmember Buckshnis' request for FD 1's budget during last year's presentation, Interim Chief Reading distributed the 2016 budget and 2015 actuals. Councilmember Nelson referred to the pie chart of responses by call type and asked the percentage of BLS and ALS calls. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl advised that information could be provided. Councilmember Nelson asked what category a vehicle accident was in and what vehicles typically responded to a vehicle accident. Interim Chief Reading responded it was in emergency medical and typically an engine, aid unit and battalion chief respond. Councilmember Nelson asked for a percentage of the vehicle accidents. Interim Chief Reading advised that could be provided. Councilmember Nelson observed there was an increase in incidents in 2015 of 573 and asked if that was due to the windstorm or other factors. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered the trend was first noticed in January and continued throughout the year. The reason for the increase is unknown, whether more people are using the system due to the Affordable Care Act, an increasing number of senior living facilities, etc. FD 1 is studying the reason but the increase is industry wide not just in FD1. Councilmember Nelson referred to the first arriving fire engine on fire response which the City has never met. He asked whether it will never be attained or could another standard be established. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl said adjusting standards is always an option during negotiations between FD1 and Edmonds. Average responses times were considered when the standard was established in 2006, the average at that time was close to what is being achieved, approximately 6:45 minutes, and a slightly better standard was established to give something to shoot for. There are many reasons the standard is not met one of which is Edmonds' geography and the inability to get assistance from the west. Councilmember Nelson referred to residential fire deployment of full first -alarm assignment and the statement in the presentation that the first arriving units have the greatest impact on the event. He asked what the response looks like. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered there are three firefighters on each rig; for all incidents in 2015, firefighters were on scene within 1-3 minutes. This first engine company does size up — making a plan, pulling lines, etc. When the second company arrives shortly thereafter, the firefighting process can begin. He summarized the firefighting process begins immediately and does not wait for all 15 firefighter to be on scene. Councilmember Nelson asked the difference between what can be done with one engine company and two. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl referred to the two-in/two-out law that requires two members out ready to rescue for every two members in; a second engine is required to provide a forth firefighter. Councilmember Nelson asked if there were limitations on what the first arriving engine could do. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered there is but there is so much to be done in the first minute; the second unit has almost always arrived by the time they are ready to do interior firefighting. The first arriving unit checks the building exterior and escape routes, assesses fire conditions, and makes strategic calls regarding how to fight the fire and locate their lines which takes time. He assured firefighters do not rush in; a strategic plan is in place first. Interim Chief Reading added if there is a known rescue, the law allows three people without waiting for the fourth. A known rescue is a credible report that someone is inside such as a mom stating their child is inside, not just a car in the driveway at 2:00 a.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 8 3.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis commented the total incidents in the City compared to total incidents by Edmonds stations do not match and asked if that was due to mutual aid. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl explained the 2015 total number of calls was provided by dispatch and the fire reporting system was changed on December 14, 2015. Interim Chief Reading said the number of station calls include mutual aid out. Councilmember Buckshnis offered to email FD1 her question. She thanked FD1 staff for providing the budget. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas echoed the thanks for the budget. She inquired what constituted a Good Intent call. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered a typical one in Edmonds is a well-meaning person looking uphill and seeing the bright orange reflection of a sunset in a window and reporting a house fire. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested including total incidents and responses for 2014. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl advised EMS calls in 2014 were 82% compared to 8 1 % in 2015. He offered to send the actual numbers for 2014. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked about national standards for turnout time. Interim Chief Reading answered there are no national standards for a suburban -type fire department. Few agencies adopt NFPA standards and it was doubtful any agency in the United States could meet the NFPA standards which include 60 second turnout time, 6 people on a ladder, 4 on an engine, a New York type standard. SHB 1756 is a state law but does not include standards; it requires standards be adopted and an annual report on those adopted standards. He offered to provide NFPA's standards. Councilmember Teitzel thanked FD1 for their presentation and the great work they do for the City. He asked whether Marine 16 was permanently moored at the Port of Edmonds marina. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered yes. Councilmember Teitzel asked how the equipment in Marine 16 compared to the equipment in an aid car. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered there is a basic life support setup on the marine unit, an aid kit and oxygen. When crews respond to the marine unit, they bring what they need depending on the type of call. For example if there is an ALS call on a boat in Puget Sound, the paramedics get on the boat with their equipment. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the issue of train blockage on the waterfront and asked if personnel on Marine 16 could respond to an emergency on the waterfront. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered yes, but the issue is FD1 personnel also have to reach the west side of the tracks as Marine 16 is not staffed. What caused the blockage will determine whether FD1 can devise a way to reach the west side; in the event of a non -hazardous, non -fire response, FD1 has a plan in place to get through the train and meet up with Port personnel. If FD1 personnel could reach the marine unit, it could be used for response. Councilmember Teitzel asked if use Marine 16 could be used as a base of operations and temporarily staffed with a full-time paramedic as an interim solution until a permanent solution to the train blockage issue is developed. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered yes but there was a cost associated with that. Councilmember Tibbott requested future reports include response times for previous years to facilitate a year-to-year comparison. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl offered to email that information to Councilmembers and add it to next year's report. Councilmember Tibbott asked how FD1 utilizes volunteers. Interim Chief Reading answered FD1 has up to 24 volunteers who do public education, parades, etc. During emergency responses, they are assigned to the air/light unit to fill air bottles, provide support and rehab for firefighters. Council President Johnson observed in the top ten injury responses, the fifth was bicycle accidents. She asked if there were more statistics available about the 49 bicycle accident responses in 2015. Interim Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 9 Assistant Chief Dahl offered to provide her additional information. Council President Johnson expressed interest in whether riders were wearing helmets and whether there were any serious head injuries. Recognizing long term concerns with the at -grade crossing, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how many times per year FD1 responds to the waterfront. Assistant Chief Eastman answered 78. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether trains blocked emergency access to the waterfront during 2015. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered there have been delays due to training crossing, two so far this year which he extrapolated to a guess of 8 for the year. He advised company officers inform dispatch when they are blocked by trains. Councilmember Teitzel inquired about coordinating with police in an active shooter situation. He asked whether aid was delayed until the scene was clear. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl explained an active shooter is a police incident first; the plans calls for unified command. Once the police have an idea where the shooter is (red/hot zone and warm zone), FD1 personnel are allowed into a warm zone with police protection. In drills, paramedics put on bullet proof vests and four police officers escort them into the area where aid is needed and maintain watch over the paramedics. If the active shooter has not been pinned down, FD1 personnel do not go in until police inform it is safe. For example, if the shooter is pinned down in the cafeteria and the students are in the gym, personnel will make a tactical entry into the gym with police. Councilmember Teitzel asked if that type of situation had been encountered in Edmonds this year. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered no. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the first arriving engine fire response, the standard that has never been met, and asked if that was related to the 10 major incidents or 4 house firs. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered that was related to all fire responses, 480 in 2015. Councilmember Mesaros asked whether the standard could be met if it was based on meeting it 80% of the time or at what percentage the standard would have been met. Interim Assistant Chief Dahl answered that information could be provided. Councilmember Mesaros suggested providing a bar chart for all the standards to illustrate trends. Councilmember Mesaros commended the concept of Ready Sunday, noting it was a great idea to discuss readiness at places where people are already gathering such as service clubs, houses of worship, etc. He was also glad to hear the response to the Count Me In When Disaster Strikes and plans for future meetings. He expressed support for continuing and expanding the Ready Sunday concept. FD1 Commission Chair Jim McGaughey thanked Interim Fire Chief Reading and department staff for their excellent and thorough work putting together this year's annual report. He referred to the term "ours," commenting the City and FD 1 are partners in providing fire and EMS services to the community. Unfortunately for the past 15 months numerous attempts have been made by FD1 to discuss the contract for services with no ability to schedule a meeting. As partners, FD 1 and the City should be able to discuss recommendations and other issues within the ILA. He relayed the Commission's interest in knowing when the Council plans to distribute the Fitch study that the City commissioned. FD1 would appreciate meeting dates and times for the two agencies to work on their partnership. Commissioner David Chan echoed that the City and FD1 are partners. He recalled Finance Director Scott James attended a recent Commission meeting. He extended an invitation for a ridealong or to visit a station. Commissioner Richard Schrock echoed Chair McGaughey's comments and relayed FD1's major undertakings this year, first, selecting a successor for Chief Widdis. FD1 has hired Prothman Company to advise them and to establish a process. FD1 wants to involve Edmonds in that process. Second, FD1 has launched a major capital facilities plan, using a team of consultants including BERK, to look at all FD1 stations including the three stations in Edmonds as well as others in the region that impact Edmonds and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 7 Packet Pg. 10 3.1.a all of FD1's service area. The study will be very extensive and will be GMA compliant. He summarized there are many reasons for FD 1 and the City to communicate. Mayor Earling asked when the Fitch study will be available. City Attorney Jeff Taraday answered he has not seen it yet, the consultant, Steve Knight, had several projects converging at the same time. Mr. Taraday assumed it will be available any day but offered to confer with Mr. Knight. Mayor Earling asked Mr. Taraday to check so he can inform FD1.Councilmember Fraley-Monillas assured the Council has not received the study. Councilmember Nelson thanked the Commission for informing the Council about their capital project, expressing interest in what that will look like, as well as having a voice on who the next Fire Chief will be as that will have a huge impact on the City. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed appreciation for the FD1's capital facilities plan. She recalled Edmonds has a 2015 review of the three fire stations that FD 1 may wish to provide to BERK. Councilmember Mesaros expressed concern with Chair McGaughey's comments about the 15 month gap in communication, commented he had not realized there had been a 15 month gap and assumed there was communication between staff. He recalled the Council requested Mr. Taraday and Mr. James represent the City in discussions regarding the ILA. The ILA states there will be regular quarterly meetings and he suggested those formal meetings be held, not necessarily to discuss the ILA but to keep communication open. Chair McGaughey said he also was surprised there had been a 15 month gap; a lot of requests have been made with no reply or a request to postpone. He agreed per the agreement FD1 and the City needs to meet quarterly but it is also necessary for transparency and working together as partners on fire and ESM service. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas inquired about the status of labor negotiations. She recalled one of the reasons for not meeting during the last year was FD1 was in the midst of labor negotiations. Fire Commissioner Kenney advised the mediation process is completed and moving to arbitration. An agreement reached with the labor negotiators was voted down by the union membership. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented it is difficult for the City to negotiate a contract when the costs are unknown. Fire Commissioner Kenny said FD1 staff has contacted Edmonds staff with a cost range. Although it is an issue for arbitration, it is not one of the big issues. Councilmember Mesaros asked the duration of the contract. Commissioner Kenney advised it typically would be a 3 year contract through 2018. Commission Meador said the contract through 2015 has been extended. FD 1 is aware of the City's concern with costs and have provided that to Mr. James and Mayor Earling. Commissioner Schrock explained the issue of contention is the inclusion in the labor contract the ability to staff peak times of day with personnel working 12 hour shifts; the primary shift length in the contract is 24 hours. Three peak units are currently operating that meet that increased demand during peak times of day but that provision is not permanently embedded in the contract. He anticipated the estimates provided to Mr. James regarding the impacts of the new contract likely are accurate. Mayor Earling recognized there have been gaps in communication but most of the contact with his office has been to discuss contract. There can certainly be meetings regarding issues such as the capital facilities plan but until the Fitch study is completed, there is not much to discuss with regard to negotiating the contract between FD1 and the City. He looked forward to meeting with FD1 regarding negotiations. Fire Commissioner Schrock commented Edmonds may want to have a peak activity unit based in Edmonds. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 11 3.1.a Terry Latin, Edmonds, expressed concern with a house on the corner of 180'h & 75t'' Place West that is referred to as the 180th Motel. Approximately 10-13 cars come and go every day. He questioned how many people can live in a single family dwelling; 8 cars are parked in the driveway every night as well as 1 car near the road and now an RV. As retired law enforcement he watches people park across the street, one person stays in the car and one person goes into the house and then the car leaves in 10-15 minutes. The people living in the house do not maintain the property and an overgrown hedge creates dangerous sight distance. He has had fantastic rapport with Edmonds and Lynnwood Police Department, code enforcement animal control, parking enforcement and fire department who have responded to the house. He encouraged the Council to drive by the housel7927 75th Place West which is becoming an eyesore. Mayor Earling requested Mr. Taraday make contact with Mr. Latin regarding the situation. Mr. Taraday suggested also notifying the Police Chief. Mayor Earling advised that would happen but the chief was not present tonight. Glen McEachern, Edmonds, echoed Mr. Latin's concerns about the house on 75th, noting he and his wife are relying on the sale of their house to provide funds for assisted living. Dick Van Hollebeke, Edmonds, representing Creative Age Festival of Edmonds (CAFE), said this is the first of its kind in the region and there are only four others in the world. He announced a 1'/2 day festival on April 15-16 that will appeal to people at or near retirement to help them enhance their later years and reengage their creative side. CAFE also means staying creative, active, fulfilled and engaged. Friday includes keynote speaker Dr. Pepper Schwartz, UW renowned sociologist; a VIP sponsorship reception; and Seattle Repertory Jazz Orchestra. Workshop seminars at the Frances Anderson Center on Saturday include fitness; exercise; well-being; health; mental acuity; a community volunteerism panel led by Mayor Earling; a presentation on lifelong learning by Dr. Jean Hernandez, President, Edmonds Community College; photography; poetry; memoir writing; painting; dance; music; horticulture, etc. The cost is $35 for any 1 of the 3 events, $55 for 2 events and $75 for 3. The first 75 purchasing all three events will be invited to a wine and cheese reception at Cascadia Art Museum. Further information and registration is available at CreativeAgeFestival.org. 6. STUDY ITEMS A. REVIEW OF FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 2, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO PROVIDE THE 2016 HEALTH & FITNESS EXPO Parks & Recreation Commission Carrie Hite requested the Council forward to the Consent Agenda authorization for the Mayor to sign an agreement with Verdant Health Commission for their funding support for the Health & Fitness Expo. This is the fourth year of the Health and Fitness Expo and third year for funding support from Verdant. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the next Consent Agenda. Ms. Hite invited the community to attend the Health & Fitness Expo on May 14 at the Edmonds- Woodway High School Stadium. NEW ITEM: CIVIC FIELD STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING Parks & Recreation Commission Carrie Hite recalled the Council adopted a resolution last week to set a public hearing on April 19 on the proposed vacation of the two platted, unimproved streets within Civic Field. The April 19 public hearing has not yet been advertised. There is also a platted, unimproved alley within Civic Field that the City currently uses for ingress/egress onto the property for maintenance vehicles and it is also used by the Boys & Girls Club. After consulting with the City Attorney and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 12 3.1.a consideration of several options, she recommends the City proceed with vacation of the two streets and the alley at the same time. She requested the Council direct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution for approval on April 5 that cancels the April 19 public hearing and sets a new date for vacation of the two streets and the alley within Civic Field. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT THE COUNCIL DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL ON APRIL 5 THAT CANCELS THE APRIL 19 PUBLIC HEARING AND SETS A NEW DATE FOR VACATION OF THE TWO STREETS AND THE ALLEY WITHIN CIVIC FIELD. Councilmember Teitzel observed when Civic Field was owned by the School District, the City had easements for two streets and an alley that could have been exercised at any time for the City's use. City Attorney Jeff Taraday agreed; if the City wanted to build streets there, the City could have done so at any time. Councilmember Teitzel asked why it was necessary to vacate the alley and street easements now that the City owns the property. Mr. Taraday answered this probably should have cleaned up in the past when the property was developed as field. Because the City is about to embark on a master planning process that will likely involve a substantial expenditure to redo Civic Field as a park, it makes sense not to have dedicated right-of-way through the park. He summarized it is essentially a housekeeping issue and although it would not be illegal to build a park on a dedicated street, it is inconsistent with the City's intent. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. B. PRESENTATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BHC CONSULTANTS FOR THE DAYTON ST. UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT ORD TO 9TH AVE) City Engineer Rob English provided photographs from a storm event in August 2013 illustrating flooding at 5th & Dayton, flooding on 5th as well as Dayton & 3rd. He explained a study began a few years ago of the Shellabarger Creek sub -basin that identified several storm improvements that needed to be made downtown. The 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan and 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan also identified replacement needs. Most of the old infrastructure is located downtown and many of the water and sewer pipes are from the late 1920-1940. An RFQ was issued in November 2015 for a comprehensive utility replacement project along Dayton. Five statements of qualifications were received and the selection committee selected BHC based on their qualifications and experience to develop a scope of work to replace the stormwater, sewer and water utility lines within Dayton from 3rd to 9th. The proposed fee is $496,800 with a $30,000 management reserve. Design will begin this year and continue into 2017, phased construction will follow via a bid package next year and in 2018. Public Works Director Phil Williams commented since the infrastructure for all three utilities downtown is old, there will be more projects like this where all utilities are replaced at the same on a street topped by a new road surface. He commented it would nice if there were a funding source that could extend that project similar to what was done on Main between 5th and 6th such as new sidewalks and street trees, undergrounded power, artistic amenities, new street furniture, etc. He acknowledged that was expensive and there was not a readily available funding source. Staff will watch for funding at the state level and he invited the Council to identify ways to extend the limits of the project to the rest of the right-of-way. Councilmember Mesaros recognized this is a unique opportunity and suggested including undergrounding of utilities. Mr. Williams commented the City would need to provide PUD funds to do a reasonable level Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 10 Packet Pg. 13 3.1.a of design to determine the cost of undergrounding. Sometimes the existing overhead wires can be moved to another location such as the alley. Undergrounding is a very expensive component of extending the improvements. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the photograph of standing water and asked about personal property damage. He acknowledged the residents living in this corridor likely would not be happy about the disruption the project will bring but will be happy about the solution. Mr. Williams responded the City has paid a lot of claims in the downtown area because the drainage is not sufficient and that trend can expect to continue. The project on Dayton is the first piece; a lot more needs to be done to stop flooding in areas that flood during a heavy rainstorm. Councilmember Mesaros asked how many claims have been paid over the past five years. Mr. Williams recalled claims filled by several condominiums related to underground parking; some were paid and some were defended. Councilmember Nelson expressed appreciation for the visualization provided by the photographs. Mr. Williams referred to the first photo of cones around a manhole, explaining the backed up water created enough pressure that it popped the bolts on the manhole cover and created a geyser. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda. C. REPORT OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE 2015 SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT City Engineer Rob English explained this contract was awarded to Buno Construction in mid-2015 in the amount of $1,090,411. Work began in June 2015 and was completed in February 2016. The project included replacement of approximately 2,300 linear feet of sewer main as well as local repairs to existing sewer mains on 5th Avenue near Dayton and on Cascade Drive. The final cost paid to the contractor was under budget at $1,084,752. He recognized the staff team, Senior Utilities Engineer Mike DeLilla and Construction Manager Henry Schroder. Councilmember Mesaros asked if this project included Railroad Avenue. Mr. English answered that was a different project. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda. D. PRESENTATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR RECOATING PROJECT City Engineer Rob English explained this contract was executed in 2015; the initial contract was preparation for recoating the two reservoirs near Five Corners. The original contract amount of $71,000 included a preliminary structural study of both reservoirs, the 1.5 million gallon tank built in 1960 and the 3 million gallon tank built in 1979. At the conclusion of the preliminary study, concerns were raised about the structural results. Some assumptions had to be made as the as -built drawings for both facilities are limited and those assumptions led to some concerns. This supplemental agreement proposes further analysis of the materials and geotechnical study of the soils adjacent to the tanks. The study will evaluate the weld strengths and soil conditions and that information can be considered in the structural analysis to determine if the concerns identified in the preliminary study are justified. The fee for the supplemental agreement is $60,000. There is the potential for additional testing if concerns remain. Additional testing could include a coupon of the metal rings within the tanks to identify the material makeup of the steel as well as the welds. That additional testing is not included in the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 11 Packet Pg. 14 3.1.a supplemental contract; the intent is to pursue a more cost effective analysis first. He recommended approval on the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Nelson said his father was a geotechnical civil engineer and he worked with him on occasion. He questioned why only one boring sample would be done. Mr. English responded due to the close proximity of the two tanks, the geotechnical engineer recommended one boring. Councilmember Nelson asked the square footage of the site. Mr. Williams answered he was not sure about the tank diameter but the intent was to do the boring between the two tanks. Mr. English said this is not like a road or trenching project where the project is a'/4 mile long; the tanks are in very close proximity. Councilmember Teitzel asked how the integrity of the welds in the tanks are checked, whether it was a visual inspect, x-ray process, etc. Mr. English referred to Task 2.2, visual examination of the welds that are assessable and ultrasonic testing of the shell and welds. This was identified as an initial, less costly step to identify the strength. Councilmember Tibbott asked if this was related to recoating of the exterior or interior of the tanks. Mr. English answered both. Councilmember Tibbott asked about service disruption as a result of that project. Mr. English explained there may be some service interruption to drain tank to perform the work. He anticipated a level would be maintained in one tank to provide backup service to the water system. With regard to length of the project, he offered to follow up at a later date as this is the preliminary design. Councilmember Mesaros inquired about the tanks' location. Mr. English advised they are above ground on Bowdoin Way. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda. E. PRESENTATION FOR AWARD OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER FOR THE CITYWIDE CIPP SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT, SUBJECT TO A SUCCESSFUL BID EVALUATION City Engineer Rob English advised the project includes rehabbing of sewer pipes in 21 locations for a total of 6,500 feet of 8-15-inch sewer main. Bids were opened bids today; the City received 2 bids, the low bid of $1,029,916 from Insituform Form Technologies. The engineer's estimate was $986,000; therefore additional funds are necessary to pursue this project. The $175,000 in additional funds would come from 3 projects including $75,000 from the 2015 sewer replacement, unspent carryforward from last year's CIP budget, and $60,000 from the 2016 sewer replacement. The $175,000 will cover the additional cost, a 10% management reserve and soft costs to manage the project. If the review of the bidder's qualifications and experience is successful, staff recommends awarding the project on the April 5 Consent Agenda. Councilmember Teitzel suggested it was counterintuitive to reduce carrying capacity of the pipe via the cured in place liner while the growing population increases volume. Mr. English answered the liner is relatively thin but it is much smoother which decreases friction and increases capacity. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda. F. PRESENTATION OF BID RESULTS FOR THE 191ST STREET SW AND 216TH ST. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Rob English reported bids were opened last week. The scope of work includes, 1) 50 foot bioswale on 191" to collect stormwater and provide treatment as well as opportunity for infiltration, and 2) 120 feet of new storm pipe on 2161h to increase the capacity of the existing pipe and reduce potential for localized Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 12 Packet Pg. 15 3.1.a flooding. The City received 11 bids, the low bid was $144,290; the engineers estimate was $198,000 so the construction budget is well within the available budget. The bid review has been completed and the low bid was found to be responsive. He recommended forwarding award of the bid with a 15% management reserve for unseen conditions for approval on the Consent Agenda. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda. G. PRESENTATION OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF TWO PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP AT 22000 HIGHWAY 99 City Manager Rob English reported the short plat review for the WINCO site to recognize the new retail building currently under construction as a separate site identified frontage improvements that require replacement and upgrade of five pedestrian ramps to meet current ADA standards. A portion of two ramps are outside the existing right-of-way and the developer agreed to provide pedestrian easements for the City to complete and maintain the ramps. He recommended approval on the Consent Agenda once the documents are finalized and reviewed by the City Attorney. Councilmember Mesaros asked that a map of the ramps be provided in the April 5 packet. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda with an updated agenda memo to include a map. H. DOWNTOWN RESTROOM AND SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET AUTHORITY Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick Doherty acknowledged discussions regarding a downtown restroom have been occurring for some time. The Strategic Action Plan identifies a downtown restroom as a priority. City Council approved a preliminary budget allocation of $260,000 in the 2016 budget to develop a downtown restroom on the City -owned parking lot adjacent to City Hall. That allocation was comprised of $110,000 from the General Fund, $90,000 from REET 1, and $60,000 from the Lodging Tax Fund 120. Since that time the Edmonds Downtown Alliance has committed $10,000, and the Noon Rotary Club has committed $5,000 (with a prospective match by the Rotary District office of $5,000). Total committed funds to date equal: $275,000. Two grant applications were submitted to Snohomish County (tourism grant and REET infrastructure grant) to supplement the City - budgeted funds; both grants were denied. Since that time, conceptual site planning and design development have been completed, as well as an updated cost estimate. An ad hoc review committee was formed to provide input and guidance on the siting and design options. The committee included Lauri Strauss of the Architectural Design Board, Lesly Kaplan of the Historic Preservation Commission, and Clayton Moss of the Edmonds Downtown Alliance Board. John Barker, Barker Landscape Architects, commented one of the first questions people ask when they visit the Edmonds Farmer's Market is, where is the restroom? A restroom will be an asset not only to the Farmer's Market but also downtown. The logical location for the downtown restroom is where the temporary portable restrooms have been located, in the parking lot adjacent to City Hall which has 21 parking stalls, 1 occupied by the temporary restroom. Mr. Barker displayed drawings and reviewed the options: Option A • Prefab CXT restroom building • Easily cleaned with pressure waster • Designed to be bomb proof Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 13 Packet Pg. 16 3.1.a • Can be customized to fit the setting • Located adjacent to City Hall and adjacent to the sidewalk to provide a storefront look • Displaces three existing parking stalls, parking lot otherwise unchanged • Parking opposite restroom remains, pedestrian protected with bollards in front of building • Current cost estimate is $311,000 Mr. Doherty commented in the effort to keep the loss of parking to a minimum, the members of the ad hoc committee were concerned the restroom was not as inviting or safe and did not create a community space because people waiting were required to remain next to the building in a space protected by bollards or on the sidewalk. Mr. Baker related another option which the ad hoc committee supported included a plaza but resulted in a loss of seven parking stalls. Mr. Doherty explained the $300,000 cost estimate was staff s guesstimate of the cost. Option B • Sites restroom on the south side of the parking lot (adjacent to the Rusty Pelican building) • Area opposite it (on the north side, adjacent to City Hall) would be developed with a landscaped plaza • Would provide seating/waiting areas near the restroom, out of the swing of backing cars, and on the sunny side of the property. • Entails restriping and re -landscaping parking lot, with a net loss of one parking space. • Cost estimate for this concept is approximately $352,000 Councilmember Buckshnis said do it right or don't do at all. The additional $41,000 can be found somewhere in the budget. With regard to a source for the additional funds, Mr. Doherty advised the REET 1 fund balance was $250,000 more than anticipated. He noted the additional cost was not just $41,000; it was also the difference between $300,000 and $275,000. He summarized Option B would require $77,000 in additional funds. Staff recommends Council approve Option B with additional funds from REET 1 and approval on next week's Consent Agenda. Award of bid would return to Council in the future. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed there were two stalls in each restroom and asked if consideration had been given to a family restroom. Mr. Doherty acknowledged there were other, bigger, more expensive models; there is a choice between eliminating parking and a larger building. One of the options is male and female restrooms with a family restroom in the center. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas suggested two unisex restrooms and a family restroom between, noting male and female restrooms were an older style and a lot of new restrooms are unisex. She noted a family would accommodate a range of issues including people with disabilities who need assistance. Mr. Doherty acknowledged a family restroom would occupy more space and cost more. He cautioned unisex restrooms are less efficient as only one person can use the restroom at a time, with male and female restrooms, two people can use the facility at the same time. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested two unisex stalls and family restroom may not be bigger than the proposed model. Mr. Doherty did not recommend unisex restrooms and said a family restroom could be added to the male and female restrooms. Councilmember Teitzel commented there has been a lot of news coverage recently about some in the transgender community who are not comfortable using the traditional male/female restroom which may support having a family or unisex option in the building. Mr. Doherty answered it is up to the Council with regard to the expenditure and loss of parking. A two-sided restroom was conceptualized last year for the budget and the recent design effort tried to remain within that amount but it could be expanded. Councilmember Nelson asked what was meant by a family restroom. Mr. Doherty assumed there was a prefab model with a male restroom, a family restroom stall, and the female restroom. He assumed that option would consume another parking space and have a higher cost. Staff and the landscape architect Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 14 Packet Pg. 17 3.1.a could return with that design at the next meeting. Councilmember Nelson questioned whether this restroom was intended for the day-to-day customers, events, or families. A family restroom would be a nice feature for families and the additional cost may be worth it. Mr. Doherty advised Option B has been presented to the internal, multi -department development review committee who determined it meets the City's standards. Councilmember Mesaros agreed with Council's comments of do it right the first time, we've waited long enough to have a restroom downtown. He liked the concept of a men's, women's and family restroom and found the loss of one parking stall acceptable to do it right. He supported having the members of the transgender community feel comfortable using the restroom of the gender they identify with. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Teitzel, explaining she has a friend who is transgender who is more comfortable using their own restroom. She commented the family/unisex restroom could address a multitude of issues, people with disabilities and their escorts, families with children, etc. Councilmember Tibbott suggested developing an Option C and D, one with two unisex restrooms and a family restroom, and another with male, female and family restrooms. Mr. Doherty advised against having basically three unisex stalls. The current proposal includes four stalls; adding a family restroom would increase it to five; unisex restrooms and a family restroom would reduce stalls to three. It was agreed staff would return on the April 5 agenda with an option that had male, female and family/unisex restrooms. I. BUDGET AUTHORIZATION FOR FEDERAL LOBBYIST/STRATEGIST SERVICES Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick Doherty commented the City is planning important transportation projects including the Waterfront At -Grade Rail Crossings Alternatives Analysis that is currently underway under the guidance and oversight of the Mayor's Advisory Task Force, key City staff and consultants. It is anticipated the Advisory Task Force will recommend preferred alternative(s) from by early fall. The Mayor will then be in a positon to recommend a preferred alternative to City Council for review and approval of the City's selected alternative — likely by year's end. Consequently, by early 2017, once a preferred alternative has been selected, a resulting project will be ready to enter the design and environmental phase, a phase that will require additional funds. As a result, it is becoming increasingly necessary to seek federal funding sources to match any local, regional and/or state funds to support this next phase. Likewise, other transportation projects, such as improvements to Highway 99 or SR 104 may also need federal funds in addition to local, regional and state funding. In order to be effective in these pursuits, it is prudent to engage the services of federal lobbyists/strategists based in Washington, D.C., who can provide daily or weekly, in -person contact with officials in the various transportation agencies, as well as elected officials and their staff. In addition, these consultants know the ins and outs of existing and even emerging grant or appropriations opportunities to prepare us both in advance of, and during, application processes. For these reasons, the Mayor's Office proposes that the City engage the services of Capitol Strategies Partners of Washington, D.C., for the remainder of this year in an amount not to exceed $42,000 ($4,000 for April, May and June; $5,000 for July through December). This appropriation would come from the 2015 positive ending General Fund cash balance of approximately $1.7 million. The Council packet includes a detailed outline of Capitol Strategies' scope of services for this year. Mr. Doherty explained last year Congress passed the FAST (Fixing America's Surface Transportation) Act. One of the first grant opportunities from that act is the FASTLANE program related to fostering Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 15 Packet Pg. 18 3.1.a advancements in shipping and transportation for the long term achievement of national efficiencies. There is $800 million available in 2016 for FASTLANE grants; the deadline for grant applicants is April 14, 2016. Senators' staff and consultants have indicated although this is a new program and the rules are being formed, it is prudent to be involved in the grant process from the beginning. Every project undergoes extensive review by various departments and regardless of whether a grant is awarded in 2016, the merits of the projects will in their minds for the next round of grants. Mr. Doherty explained Edmonds has a compelling case related to the At -Grade Crossing Analysis which has included a textbook public process with public outreach, public open houses, and technical expertise. A grant request for the project would be to fund the next steps, a design process and environmental process for whatever alternative arises from the process. The consultant would help review the FASTLANE materials and ensure the City's application meets their requirements. Capitol Strategies was involved in drafting the FAST ACT and understand it well. Funding sources in addition to the FAST Act include Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program, TIGER grants, funding through the Washington State Legislature via dead earmarks (projects that did not materialize), etc. Mr. Doherty commented the City has other major transportation projects such as SR 104 and Highway 99; state funds allocated in 2023 for Highway 99 could be used to leverage federal funds. He relayed Mayor Earling's recommendation to authorize the expenditure of $42,000 to enter into contract with Capitol Strategies for approval on the next Consent Agenda. Councilmember Mesaros said he is a firm believer in hiring expertise to get the job done right. The City has a history of doing that as was described during several previous agenda items. This is an opportunity to assist the City in solving access issues to the west side of the tracks. Once a solution is identified, the City will need to determine how to pay for it and the resources of others will be extremely important. He agreed the expenditure of $42,000 to identified millions in additional resources was a good investment. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said her interest beyond the at -grade crossing was the Highway 99 corridor. Completing the Highway 99 is a number #1 goal in the SAP. It took Shoreline 10 years of planning to obtain funding. She was hopeful Capital Strategies would also assist with obtaining funds for Highway 99 sooner than 2023. Mr. Doherty referred to Highway 99 in Capitol Strategies' scope of services., pointing out that identifying a source of funds at the federal level to leverage the state funds may compel the state to move those funds up. Capitol Strategies has worked with other communities in the region to do that. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas offered her assistance to obtain funding for that project. Councilmember Teitzel observed the consultant's efforts could help secure funding for Highway 99, the waterfront project as well as SR 104. Mr. Doherty responded the consultant would initially assist with the FASTLANE application as well as in -person contact with officials in the various transportation agencies, as well as elected officials and their staff. Capitol Strategies works on transportation -related projects for multiple jurisdictions and knows all the grant and allocation possibilities. Councilmember Teitzel asked if there was an out if the contractual relationship did not work out. Mr. Doherty advised there is a 30-day out clause. Councilmember Nelson expressed support on a core level. Hiring someone to lobby on your behalf in a city where funding can be obtained cannot be beat. The City will need federal funds for all these projects, and having someone on the ground will be invaluable. He recognized this was not necessarily a fast process; it was the beginning of a very long process. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 16 Packet Pg. 19 3.1.a Council President Johnson was intrigued by dead earmarks, remarking that within 6 months there will be an opportunity to apply for $363,405 for project that did not occur near Alderwood Mall; the City is eligible to apply because it is located within 50 miles of the project. She encouraged staff to apply for that grant for whatever project would be appropriate. She supported this contract, recognizing this consultant will assist with various types of transportation financing. She expressed concern with one phrase, "We understand the priority you have given to the waterfront at grade rail crossings project." She found that a loaded statement and preferred not to have it in the scope of work. Mr. Doherty agreed that sentence could be eliminated. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda. 7. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARDS AND COMMITTEES Councilmember Buckshnis reported the Tree Board welcomed a new member Doug Peterson. A second board member resigned before she started so a new board member will be confirmed on the April 5 Consent Agenda. The Tree Board discussed the Critical Area Ordinance. She reminded of the April 5 presentation in Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. by Cass Turnbull, The Seven Myths of Site Selection and Care of Trees. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed Val Stewart attended the WRIA 8 meeting in her absence; the meeting included an update of the 4-year work plan, discussion regarding the Ballard Locks that are in need infrastructure review, and the acquisition Wayne Golf Course in Bothell for which WRIA 8 provided support to Forterra. Councilmember Buckshnis reported she will be assisting with WRIA 8 grant awards in early April. Councilmember Nelson reported the Snohomish County Tomorrow meeting included election of officers, a briefing on Sound Transit 3 and a presentation on Marysville's Comprehensive Plan, a city experiencing rapid growth. Councilmember Nelson reported Snohomish Emergency Radio System (SERS) will be purchasing a new Ford F-350 to provide fuel for the generators that operate the microwave communication antennas. SERS is changing their internet from broadband to fiber optics. The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee reviewed year-end financials which revealed $16,880 more than projected was generated in lodging tax revenue and also discussed the schedule for 2017 funding cycle. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported Human Resources Manager Mary Ann Hardie and she are working on the hiring process for the Council Assistant. The City received 40 applications, 20 met the qualifications and phone interviews will be done tomorrow with 6 applicants with a goal of reducing the number to be interviewed to the top 3. Council President Johnson and possibly another Councilmember will be involved in the interviews. Councilmember Mesaros reported the SeaShore Transportation Forum included a fascinating presentation on the Alaska Way Viaduct replacement and the tunnel boring, an engineering marvel; a presentation from PSRC on projects in the region that are impactful on north Seattle and Shoreline; a presentation from a King County task force on bridges and roads; and an update on route changes/expansion in Lynnwood and Edmonds including the addition of a 4:40 a.m. Swift bus. Councilmember Mesaros reported the SNOCOM (911 dispatch for SW Snohomish County) Board meeting included continued discussion regarding a merger with SNOPAC and a joint meeting with SNOCOM and SNOPAC that resulted in a decision to hire someone to facilitate merger discussions. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 17 Packet Pg. 20 3.1.a Councilmember Mesaros reported the Regional Transit Oriented Advisory Committee, a PSRC subcommittee that considers affordable housing on transit corridors, discussed affordable housing on the Sound Transit 3 feeder corridors. He planned to attend the Edmonds Public Facilities District meeting on Thursday. Councilmember Teitzel commented everything the Council has discussed tonight seems relatively insignificant compared to what has happened in Brussels today and he offered his thoughts and prayers to the people of Brussels. He reported on the Port of Edmonds Commission meeting; revenues for boat operations are up, fuel and dock revenues are up, in -water moorage is 97% full, occupancy at Harbor Square high and there have been two new leases. Port Commissioner Mary Lou Block announced her retirement at the end of the month; she has served on the Commission since 2002. The Commission will be seeking someone to complete the 18 months remaining on her term. Councilmember Teitzel reported the historic designation of the North Sound Church will be presented to the Council on April 5. Assuming it is approved by Council, an award ceremony will be coordinated with Pastor Barry Crane and Mayor Earling. Councilmember Teitzel reported Councilmember Tibbott and he had a tour of the wastewater treatment plant. It is a very well run, fascinating, complicated system. Councilmember Mesaros commented he often sees people taking wedding photos in front of that building, certain they do not realize it is a sewage treatment plant. Councilmember Teitzel recommended citizens tour the facility. Councilmember Tibbott reported the Affordable Housing Alliance (AHA) meeting included a presentation from Frank Slessor, Snohomish County, regarding affordable housing in Snohomish County and the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update; and a presentation by Executive Director Christina Gallant that described the difficulty Snohomish County has obtaining housing grants because there are only 2 cities in Snohomish County with more than 50,000 population, the threshold for most grants. One of the ways to improve the opportunity to obtain affordable housing grants is to have funds designated/committed for housing options that meet different population needs. He will continue to look for ways for the City and the region to garner state and federal grants to provide more housing options in Edmonds and the region. AHA is changing to a quarterly meeting format. Council President Johnson reported she attended the Edmonds Historical Museum meeting and swore in the new board members. She and other Councilmembers attended the Snohomish County Cities dinner which included a presentation from Jean Hernandez, President, Edmonds Community College, regarding science, technology, engineering and math programs at Edmonds Community College. Mayor Earling reported on Thursday the Sound Transit Board will make a decision whether to proceed with ST3. If approved, a public review process will follow and then the Board will make a final decision whether to place it on the November ballot. He was guardedly hopeful Snohomish County would reach agreement with the region with regard to the intended outcome of ST3. 8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling commented the east -west corridors in Snohomish County will become increasing important and a higher priority to solve transportation problems. For example 228"' which should be completed in the next 6 weeks will be another east -west corridor. He also attended the Port meeting to recognize Mary Lou Block, recalling she was the City's Planning Director in the 1970s and worked for Snohomish County Executive Bob Drewel prior to her retirement. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 18 Packet Pg. 21 3.1.a Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported the Snohomish County Cities dinner included a presentation from Jean Hernandez regarding the programs at Edmonds Community College. Further information is available on their website. Councilmember Mesaros reported funding raising for the Veteran's Plaza is proceeding well. He encouraged the public to make a gift to the Veteran's Plaza. Councilmember Teitzel announced an Easter Egg Hung at the Frances Anderson Center field on Sat at 9:30 a.m. Council President Johnson reported Emily Scott is coordinating a food drive for Edmonds College Place Elementary at the Historic Museum; food donation can be brought to the second floor of the museum through the month of April to benefit kids in the Edmonds School District and food banks. Council President Johnson announced an interactive workshop regarding Highway 99 on Thursday, March 24 in the Brackett Room of City Hall. She announced the appointment of Councilmember Tibbott as the Council liaison to the Economic Development Commission. 10. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 11. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:43 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 22, 2016 Page 19 Packet Pg. 22 3.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of January 26, 2016, February 9, 2016, February 23, 2016, and March 1, 2016. Staff Lead/Author: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Initiated By: Staff recommends that Council review the draft minutes and approve them on the Consent Agenda. Attachments: Cm012616 spec mtg Cm020916 spec mtg Cm022316 spec mtg Cm030116 spec mtg Packet Pg. 23 3.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES January 26, 2016 The Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t Avenue North, Edmonds. Elected Officials Present Kristiana Johnson, Council President Mike Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Others Present Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Carrie Hite, Parks Recreation & Cultural Services Director Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Shane Hope, Development Services Dir. Phil Williams, Public Works Director Scott Passey, City Clerk 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(B) AND PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would recess into an executive session to discuss real estate acquisition per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) and potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 30 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room. 2. ADJOURN The executive session concluded at 6:50 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 26, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 24 3.2.b EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES February 9, 2016 The Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:20 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t Avenue North, Edmonds. Elected Officials Present Kristiana Johnson, Council President Mike Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Dave Earling, Mayor Others Present Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Carrie Hite, Parks Recreation & Cultural Services Director Scott Passey, City Clerk 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(B). Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would recess into an executive session to discuss real estate acquisition per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 10 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room. The executive session concluded at 6:25 p.m. 2. MEET WITH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD CANDIDATE ATHENE TARRANT FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE ADB IN POSITION #3 — LAYMAN. The City Council met with Athene Tarrant, a candidate for confirmation to the ADB. The meeting took place in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. All elected officials were present. 3. MEET WITH ARTS COMMISSION CANDIDATE LESLY KAPLAN FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE ARTS COMMISSION IN POSITION #7 — LITERARY. The City Council met with Lesly Kaplan, a candidate for confirmation to the Arts Commission. The meeting took place in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. All elected officials were present. 4. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 9, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 25 3.2.c EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES February 23, 2016 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 51h Avenue North, Edmonds. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor none Kristiana Johnson, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. MEET WITH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD CANDIDATE LAURI STRAUSS FOR CONFIRMATION TO THE ADB At 6:45 p.m., the City Council met with Lauri Strauss, a candidate for confirmation to the ADB. The meeting took place in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. All elected officials were present. The meeting concluded at 6:58 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 23, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 26 3.2.d EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES March 1, 2016 The Edmonds City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5ffi Avenue North, Edmonds. The Mayor announced that the Council would convene in the Jury Meeting Room to conduct interviews for appointments to various City Boards. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. MEET WITH CITIZENS' TREE BOARD CANDIDATE ROBERT (DOUG) PETERSON FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD The City Council met with Doug Peterson, a candidate for appointment to the Tree Board. 0 T 2. MEET WITH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD CANDIDATE JOSEPH HERR FOR r APPOINTMENT TO THE ADB BUILDER POSITION. The City Council then met with Joseph Herr, a candidate for appointment to the ADB Builder position. ADJOURN The Council meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 1, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 27 3.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Approval of claim checks #219083 through #219179 dated March 24, 2016 for $385,169.60 (reissued check #219125 $130.00) and claim checks #219180 through #219314 dated March 31, 2016 for $454,672.86 (reissued check #219282 $123.60). Staff Lead/Author: Nori Jacobson Department: Administrative Services Initiated By: Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Staff recommends approval of claim checks on the Consent Agenda. Attachments: Claim cks 03-24-16 Claim cks 03-31-16 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-31-16 Packet Pg. 28 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219083 3/24/2016 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 364738 WWTP - PEST CONTROL March Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 Total 219084 3/24/2016 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 3162041 P&R: WINTER COED VOLLEYBALL P&R: WINTER COED VOLLEYBALL 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 3162042 P&R: WINTER 3 ON 3 LEAGUE SHIF P&R: WINTER 3 ON 3 LEAGUE SHIF 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 Total 219085 3/24/2016 065568 ALLWATER INC 030416040 WWTP - DRINKING WATER SERVIC water services (plus reantal/supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 031816038 WWTP - DRINKING WATER SERVIC water services (plus rental/supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total: 219086 3/24/2016 001528 AM TEST INC 91233 WWTP- MERCURY TEST sludge metals testing 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 Total: 219087 3/24/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1988506369 WWTP - UNIFORMS, MATS AND TO uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.3.a Page: 1 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 29 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219087 3/24/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) mats and towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 81.0z Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.2� 9.5% Sales Tax E 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 7.7( 1988506370 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE o 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 36.2 1 > 1988510430 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE o PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 0. a 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.3< Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 5.0( PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 5.0( to PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 4 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 5.0( N PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE o 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 5.0( Y PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE U 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 5.0: •� 9.5% Sales Tax V 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.1 < 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.4£ E 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.4£ Q 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.4£ 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.4£ 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.4£ Page: 2 Packet Pg. 30 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219087 3/24/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 1988510431 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 15.6, FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 12.8. 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.4E 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.2, Total: 188.6: 219088 3/24/2016 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0881806-IN WWTP - DIESEL FUEL USLSD #2 Dyed Bulk Fuel 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 1,051.5E 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 99.9( Total: 1,151.4( 219089 3/24/2016 001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC INV188396 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES Library - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 26.9. 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.5E Total: 29.5( 219090 3/24/2016 064541 AURORA RENTS INC 450141-1 CITY HALL PERMIT COUNTER - GR City Hall Permit Counter - Grinder 001.000.66.518.30.45.00 279.5� Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 324.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.45.00 26.5( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.7E 450513-1 CITY HALL DEV SVC PERMIT COUN Page: 3 Packet Pg. 31 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219090 3/24/2016 064541 AURORA RENTS INC (Continued) City Hall Dev Svc Permit Counter - 001.000.66.518.30.45.00 33.0( Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 001.000.66.518.30.45.00 3.1: Total: 697.0E E 219091 3/24/2016 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 1049703 WWTP - CLARIFIER #3 PUBLISH P CLARIFIER #3 PROJECT— p 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 45.0( Fa 1049703.13 E4FB/ESFA.PUBLISH ING BID DOCS 0 0 E4FB/E5FA.Publishing Bid Docs Q. 422.200.72.594.31.41.00 49.5( Q Total: 94.5( 0 219092 3/24/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 15885788 CONTRACT CHARGE FOR COUNCI Monthly contract charge for Council v 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 27.9� - 9.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 2.6( M 15885791 CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE U 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 466.9 1 E 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 44.3( V 15885792 PARKS & REC COPIER IRC5051 CC PARKS & REC COPIER IRC5051 CC E 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 273.7z 15885793 CITY CLERKS RECEPTION COPIER RECEPTION DESK COPIER LEASE Q 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 20.1' 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 1.9' 15885795 LEASE, CONTRACT CHARGE BUIL[ LEASE, CONTRACT CHARGE BUIL[ 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 36.1( Page: 4 Packet Pg. 32 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219092 3/24/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 219093 3/24/2016 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 5 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 15885796 P & REC PRINTER IRC10301F CONI _ P & REC PRINTER IRC10301F CONI ui 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 30.6E u 158857974 CONTRACT CHARGE PLANNING PI contract charge for planning printer U E 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 36.1( 15896130 INV#15896130 - EDMONDS PD CONT CHG #IR6255 FOR 3/2016 0 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 151.81 7v- B/W METER USAGE 2/1-2/29/16 0 L 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 60.6( a CONT CHG #IR33251 FOR 3/2016 Q 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 60.7( B/W METER USAGE 2/1-2/29/16 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 12.5E Z. COLOR METER USAGE 2/1-2/29/16 cfl 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 114.1' 4 B/W METER USAGE 2/1-2/29/16 N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 25.8( o COLOR METER USAGE 2/1-2/29/16 U) 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 97.5� 9.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 64.9, V CONT CHG #IRC5240A FOR 3/2016 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 160.0( 15896135 PARKS MAINT PRINTER IRC10301F E PARKS MAINT PRINTER IRC10301F 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 36.1( c� V Q 15899269 ENG COPIER CHARGES MARCH 2C Eng. Copier Charges March 2016 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 516.9' Total: 2,242.01 451503-1602 E4GB.SERVICES THRU FEBRUARY E4GB.Services thru February 2016 Page: 5 Packet Pg. 33 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219093 3/24/2016 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC 219094 3/24/2016 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 219095 3/24/2016 004095 COASTWIDE LABS 219096 3/24/2016 068161 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION INC 219097 3/24/2016 069529 D & G BACKHOE INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 12139 G W 2861488 N W 2861488 1000313259 E4JB.Pmt 9 219098 3/24/2016 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3310637 3310908 PO # Description/Account 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 Total INV#12139 CUST#47 - EDMONDS P PRISONER R&B FOR FEB 2016 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 Total PM: CREW NEUTRAL CLNR, LINER PM: CREW NEUTRAL CLNR, LINER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: JUMBO ACCLAIM, BRAWNY, Pl PM: JUMBO ACCLAIM, BRAWNY, Pl 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total PS - ANNUAL MONITORING FEES PS - Annual Monitoring Fees 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total E4JB.PMT 9 SERVICES THRU 2/29/' E4JB.Pmt 9 Services thru 2/29/16 421.200.74.594.34.65.00 E4JB.Ret 9 421.200.223.400 Total E4FB/E5FA.ADVERTISEMENT FOR E4FB/E5FA.Advertisement for Bids 422.200.72.594.31.41.00 E1CA.ADVERTISEMENT FOR CM SI 3.3.a Page: 6 Amoun 2,968.9z 2,968.91 u) m t U 1,373.7: •� 1,373.7! w- 0 0 0 549.4� Q. a 52.2( Q 0 r 375.5' 0 35.6 - N 1,012.81 o lid E 393.2: 393.2! U -7,370.7: Q 154,048.11 518.7( Page: 6 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 7 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219098 3/24/2016 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE (Continued) E1 CA.Advertisement for CM Services 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 425.1( Y Total: 943.8( L) m t 219099 3/24/2016 006635 DEPT OF LICENSING DeLilla.PE License DELILLA.PE LICENSE RENEWAL 2C U DeLilla.PE License Renewal 2016 E M 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 116.0( 6 Total: 116.0( o 219100 3/24/2016 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 16-3640 INV#16-3640 - EDMONDS PD o TRANSCRIPTION CASE #15-3987 Q. 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 442.2( Q TRANSCRIPTION CASE #2015-204F 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 221.1( c TRANSCRIPTION CASE #16-2480 r 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 82.5( TRANSCRIPTION CASE #IA15-005 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 75.9( N TRANSCRIPTION CASE #2015-0022 M 0 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 171.6( N 16-3643 JEANNIE DINES CITY COUNCIL RE' U City Council Retreat Minutes (March E 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 676.5( 2 16-3644 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3/15/16 V 03/15/16 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 290.4( E Total: 1,960.2( c� 219101 3/24/2016 075468 DRAMA KIDS 20666 DRAMA KIDS 20666 DRAMA KIDS INSTRUCTION Q 20666 DRAMA KIDS INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 333.0( Total : 333.0( 219102 3/24/2016 069523 EDMONDS P&RYOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 20649 CORDOVATHIARA 20649 CORDOVATHIARA 20649 CORDOVATHIARA Page: 7 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 219102 3/24/2016 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP (Continued) 20762 DAVIS MIKE 219103 3/24/2016 038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 219104 3/24/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Description/Account 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 20762 DAVIS MIKE YOUTH SCHOLP 20762 DAVIS MIKE YOUTH SCHOLP 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 Total: 2016-03-01 03/16 RECREATION SERVICES COf 03/16 Recreation Services Contract F 001.000.39.569.10.41.00 Total 6-00025 MARINA BEACH PARK SPRINKLER MARINA BEACH PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-00200 FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-00410 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPF BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPF 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-00475 ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-01127 WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 2( WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 2( 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 6-01130 WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 9z WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 9z 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 6-01140 WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 5( WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 5( 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 6-01250 CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 3.3.a Page: 8 Amoun 63.0( N U m 75.0( 138.0( E 2 U 0 5,000.0( 5,000.0( p L Q a a 158.5' c r 462.4E 4 N M 310.9: N U E 755.8: 'M V 25.6: Q 1,242.3: 162.0( Page: 8 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219104 3/24/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 9 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 6-01275 CITY PARK PARKING LOT _ CITY PARK PARKING LOT ui 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,070.8� u 6-01280 CITY PARK SPRAY PARK CITY PARK U E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 239.8' 'Fu 6-02125 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 264.6E 6-02727 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER o BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER L Q. 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 a 236.2E Q 6-02730 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 236.2E Z. 6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF o PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF 4 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,829.1 E N 6-02736 FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH A\j M 0 FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH A\j Y 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.6E u 6-02737 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / E FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 2 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,210.6E U 6-02738 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA E 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 236.2E 6-02825 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / F SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � Q 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,502.1 z 6-02875 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF FRANCESANDERSON CENTER FIF 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 25.6: 6-02900 FAC SPRINKLER FAC SPRINKLER Page: 9 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 10 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219104 3/24/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 236.2( _ 6-02925 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( ui FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( U 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 m 1,746.7 , 6-03000 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI E CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 425.6< 6-03275 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI o HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 154.9( o 6-03575 MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER L Q. MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 267.1' 6-04127 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; c FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST : v 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 761.2E to 6-04128 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TF 4 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TF N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.6E c 6-04400 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER Y SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 236.2( E 6-04425 SEAVIEW PARK F0 SEAVIEW PARK V 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 444.6E 6-04450 SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER E SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 330.8' +° 6-05155 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 148.7( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 565.3( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 565.3( Page: 10 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219104 3/24/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 6-05156 6-06040 6-07775 6-08500 6-08525 219105 3/24/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR34295 3.3.a Page: 11 PO # Description/Account Amoun PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 565.3( Y PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; U 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 565.3( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 565.3( PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 0 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 1.8< > PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 0 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 6.9E 0- PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 Q 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 6.9E PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 c 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 6.9E Z. PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 cfl 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 6.9E 4 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 N 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 M 6.9z c 5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGi Y 5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGi 0 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 41.1 E MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER V MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 294.4E YOST PARK SPRINKLER E YOST PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 c� 11023.5z Q YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 252.8: Total : 19,381.3E ADDTL COPY CHARGES- PLANNINi ADDTL COPY CHARGES- PLANNINi Page: 11 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219105 3/24/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) AR34296 219106 3/24/2016 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES 219107 3/24/2016 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 219108 3/24/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD AR34297 20683 DANCE 20684 DANCE 0116563-IN E D H 685951 EDH687022 EDH687710 PO # Description/Account 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 COPER OVERAGE CHARGE Council Office copier overage charge 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 ADDTL COPIES- BLDG addtl copy charges- bldg 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total 20683 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE 20683 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 20684 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE 20684 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total INV#01 1 6563-IN ACCT#0011847 - E[ BASKETWEAVE BADGE CASE (AN[ 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 PACKING, MATERIAL FEE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Total E4FB/E5FA.ADVERTISEMENT FOR E4FB/E5FA.Advertisement for Bids 422.200.72.594.31.41.00 E1CA.ADVERTISEMENT FOR CM SI E1 CA.Advertisement for CM Services 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 LEGAL NOTICES PLN20150018 LEGAL NOTICES PLN20150018 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 3.3.a Page: 12 Page: 12 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219108 3/24/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) EDH688435 219109 3/24/2016 071572 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS 103360A 219110 3/24/2016 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY 219111 3/24/2016 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC WAMOU38998 PO # Description/Account INV#EDH688435 ACCT#14126500 - UNCLAIMED PROPERTYAD 3/16/1E 001.000.41.521.10.41.40 Total INV#103360A CUST#21159 - EDMOP 12 MED ADJUSTABLE TUBES 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 12 SMALL ADJUSTABLE TUBES 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 Total W WTP - REPAIR/REPLACE, MECH� 5/32" Hand Chuck Key 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Total 0497000 METER INVENTORY #2024 - Meter Inventory #2024 - 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 0497731 WATER INVENTORY #0114 - W-CPL Water Inventory #0114 - W-CPLGCI-' 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 Water Inventory #170 - 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 7.7% sales tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 Total: 3.3.a Page: 13 Page: 13 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 14 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219112 3/24/2016 011900 FRONTIER 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 62.3< Y 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER AL, U FRANCESANDERSON CENTER FIF 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 U 131.0, E Total: 219113 3/24/2016 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL 005015975 1NV#005015975 ACCT#1 00 1074529 0 CHEST EMBROIDERY (SWAT) 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 79.0E p LOGO DESIGN (SWAT) Q. 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 95.8E Q 9.6% Sales Tax 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 16.7( o 005015976 1NV#005015976 ACCT#1 00 1074529 r CHEST EMBROIDERY (SWAT) to 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 52.7, " LOGO DESIGN (SWAT) N 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 63.9, c 9.6% Sales Tax Y 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 11.2( u 005015977 1NV#005015977 ACCT#1 00 1074529 E LOGO DESIGN (SWAT) 2 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 87.8� V 9.6% Sales Tax .r 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 a� 8.4z E 005023409 1NV#005023409 ACCT#1 00 1074529 TRANSPORT HOODS 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 51.8( Q 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 4.9, 005030638 1NV#005030638 ACCT#1 00 1074529 E.P. LETTERS 1/2" RHODIUM 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 89.7E 9.5% Sales Tax Page: 14 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219113 3/24/2016 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL (Continued) 219114 3/24/2016 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 219115 3/24/2016 012560 HACH COMPANY PO # Description/Account 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 Total 169084/1 WATER INVENTORY #114 W-CPLG Water Inventory #114 W-CPLGCI-12 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 #170 - W-FOLOWRCI-12-010 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 #581 - W-FOLOWRCI-12-020 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 #168 W-FOLOWRCI-08-020 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Total 9798708 WATER QUALITY - TESTING SUPP Water Quality - Testing Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9813942 W WTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, Li sc200 CONTROLLER, AC/DC, 2pH, 1 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 COVER ASSY, UV & SUN SHILED, s 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 9816775 WWTP- REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, L 3.3.a Page: 15 Page: 15 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 16 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219115 3/24/2016 012560 HACH COMPANY (Continued) INSERTION MTG, ANALOG, 1 1/2" S 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 2,199.2E Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 208.9: 9845173 W WTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, Li E Freight cc 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 114.4( 9.5% Sales Tax o 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 85.6� PHD, PEEK, pH -WIDE RANGE o 423.000.76.535.80.48.31 787.5: a Total: 6,028.91 Q 219116 3/24/2016 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 14126521 WATER PARTS o Water Parts r 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,809.2z Water Inventiory #0435 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,023.4E N 9.5% Sales Tax c 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 171.8E u) 9.5% Sales Tax U 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 97.Z .E 14137770 WATER INVENTORY -#0435 W-SET M Water Inventory -#0435 W-SETTERC V .r 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 2,046.9E Water Parts E 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 949.7( 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 90.2, Q 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 194.4( Total: 6,383.1 , 219117 3/24/2016 075553 HENIFIN, MELANI 3/17 REFUND 3/17/16 REFUND 3/17/16 REFUND Page: 16 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219117 3/24/2016 075553 HENIFIN, MELANI 219118 3/24/2016 075133 HERRIN, NICOLE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.239.200 Total: BID - 03172016 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FEBR BID Administrative services for 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total: 219119 3/24/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5085103 80839 9015323 9031659 219120 3/24/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2768088 PM: CEMENT, PRIMER PM: CEMENT, PRIMER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: NOZZLES, HANDLE, SCRUB BF PM: NOZZLES, HANDLE, SCRUB BF 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: PEAT, TOOLSET, GLV, CEMEN- PM: PEAT, TOOLSET, GLV, CEMEN- 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 CREDIT PALLET FEE CREDIT PALLET FEE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total POST IT POP UP NOTE PADS Post it Pop up Note pads - 3x3 and 4; 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 3.3.a Page: 17 Page: 17 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219120 3/24/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 18 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 2769372 COPY PAPER Copy Paper - 6 cases Y 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 227.9z L) 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 U 21.6E E 2769398 DOUBLE WINDOW ENVELOPES FC Double Window Envelopes for Payrol 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 121.5� o 9.5% Sales Tax 75- 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 11.5E o 2770726 SHARED OFFICE SUPPLIES - COPI Q- Shared office supplies - copier a Q 001.000.61.557.20.31.00 8.1E Shared office supplies - copier c 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 8.1E Z. Shared office supplies - copier cfl 001.000.22.521.10.31.00 8.1 , 4 9.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.61.557.20.31.00 0.7 1 o 9.5% Sales Tax Y 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 0.7 1 u 9.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.22.521.10.31.00 0.7E V 2770729 CITY CLERKS OFFICE AA BATTERII ENIGIZER MAX AA BATTERIES FOR a� 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 16.5E E 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 c� 1.5 1 Q 2771223 2 HOLE PUNCH & MONITOR RISER 2 hole punch & monitor riser returned 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 -137.1 � 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 -13.0: 2772448 RUBBER BANDS RETURNED FOR Page: 18 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 19 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219120 3/24/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued) Rubber bands returned for credit 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 -5.1: 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 -0.4� 2772471 RUBBER BANDS RETURNED FOR Rubber bands returned for credit 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 -3.9� 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 -0.3£ 2772678 OFFICE SUPPLIES- DSD Office supplies- DSD 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 174.7< Total: 486.31 219121 3/24/2016 071634 INTEGRATELECOM 13723132 C/A768328 PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 912.9< Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929; 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 8.4£ Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 8.4£ Total: 929.8� 219122 3/24/2016 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 544058 FLEET EXCHANGE Fleet Exchange 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -22.5E 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -2.1 550578 UNIT 122 - EXCHANGED BATTERY Unit 122 - exchanged Battery see cre 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 116.8( 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.1( Tota I : 103.2' Page: 19 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 20 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219123 3/24/2016 075552 JAMES SMITH & TERI HEIN 7-06850 #01148-51446 UTILITY REFUND #01148-51446 Utility refund - receive( 411.000.233.000 101.5< Total: 101.5: 219124 3/24/2016 064934 JOHN BARKER LANDSCAPE 14-7-123 DOWNTOWN RESTROOM DESIGN DOWNTOWN RESTROOM DESIGN 132.000.64.594.76.65.00 6,677.0( Total: 6,677.0( 219125 3/24/2016 070019 JUDICIAL CONF REGISTRAR 5152016 DMCMAANNUAL CONFERENCE DMCMAANNUAL CONFERENCE 001.000.23.512.50.49.00 130.0( Total: 130.0( 219126 3/24/2016 075265 KBA INC 3002674 E7AC.SERVICES THRU 2/29/16 E7AC.Services thru 2/29/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 37,309.8 , Total: 37,309.8 , 219127 3/24/2016 067568 KPG INC 23116 E3DB.SERVICES THRU 2/25/16 E3DB.Services thru 2/25/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 1,971.7: 29216 E5DA.SERVICES THRU 2/25/16 E5DA.Services thru 2/25/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 820.8 , Total: 2,792.6, 219128 3/24/2016 062814 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 525126 INV#525126 CUST#27559 - EDMON FALCON HR7000 RADAR GUN 001.000.41.521.70.35.00 908.E 1 misc sales tax % 001.000.41.521.70.35.00 83.1 Total: 991.8E 219129 3/24/2016 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 03082016-01 INV#03082016-01 - EDMONDS PD 19 CAR WASHES $5.03 (INC TX) 2/1 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219129 3/24/2016 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH (Continued) 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 95.5 1 Total: 95.5 , 219130 3/24/2016 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 36854 TO 15-08.MARINA BEACH PARK -PH TO 15-08.Marina Beach Park - Phase 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 12,391.9: Total: 12,391.9. 219131 3/24/2016 075260 LAU, PING 11915 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 109.3z Total: 109.31 219132 3/24/2016 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 125 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 300.0( Total: 300.0( 219133 3/24/2016 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER Cigna -April CIGNAAPRIL PREMIUMS April Cigna premiums 811.000.231.550 11,179.6( Total: 11,179.6E 219134 3/24/2016 019940 MC COMAS, GARY 28 LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT LEOFF 1 Claim Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,458.7z Total: 1,458.71 219135 3/24/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 52460238 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANICAL Typw 316 Stainless Steel Yor-Lok Tut 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 195.9, Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 6.1( Total: 202.01 219136 3/24/2016 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 15-1695-8 ESJA.SERVICES THRU 2/29/16 Page: 21 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 22 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219136 3/24/2016 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES (Continued) ESJA.Services thru 2/29/16 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 19.524.5( 219137 3/24/2016 075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING 4 219138 3/24/2016 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS 71974 219139 3/24/2016 064006 NORTH WEST INSTRUMENT SERVICES 13080 219140 3/24/2016 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 219141 3/24/2016 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 83535 2-1583510 Total: WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PR1 WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PR1 125.000.64.575.50.41.00 Total WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANICAL W HITEABSORBAN- 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 9.2% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 Total INV#13080 - EDMONDS PD ANALYTICAL/BALANCE #41343763f 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 ANALYTICAL/BALANCE #41343765� 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 Total WWTP - SODIUM BISULFITE Sodium Bisulfite - 38% 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 Total CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY Bl Page: 22 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 23 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219141 3/24/2016 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC (Continued) CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B( 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.8E 2-1588369 HAINES WHARF HONEY BUCKET HAINES WHARF HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 218.7E 2-1590352 WILLOW CREEK HONEY BUCKET WILLOW CREEK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.8E Total: 446.4E 219142 3/24/2016 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 636 3/9/16 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 3/9/16 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 280.0( Total: 280.0( 219143 3/24/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 523289 DISCOVERY: JUMP DRIVES DISCOVERY: JUMP DRIVES 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 40.9, 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 3.8� Tota I : 44.8' 219144 3/24/2016 073714 OLBRECHTS & ASSOC PLLC janfeb16 HEARING EXAMINER FEES- JAN & pin20150068- hearing examiner 001.000.245.967 224.0( pin20150063 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 420.0( Total: 644.0( 219145 3/24/2016 072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 1649636 UNIT 448 - SUPPLIES Unit 448 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 14.8 1 Unit M16 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.8( Total: 19.6, Page: 23 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219146 3/24/2016 072878 PACIFIC COAST CHEMICALS CO 159969 WWTP - SUPPLIES, OPERATIONS Wilson Clay 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 2,940.0( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 376.8: 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 315.1( Total: 3,631.9: 219147 3/24/2016 075250 PARK, KAILI 3/9 DISCOVERY PROGRA 3/9/16 DISCOVERY PROGRAM ASS 3/9/16 DISCOVERY PROGRAM ASS 001.000.64.571.23.41.00 32.5( Total: 32.5( 219148 3/24/2016 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 20110010.000-50 E7AC.SERVICES THRU 2/28/16 E7AC.Services thru 2/28/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 1,347.8< Total: 1,347. & 219149 3/24/2016 064552 PITNEY BOWES 9607730-MR16 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE-- 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 718.6( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 68.2 1 Total: 786.8 , 219150 3/24/2016 075432 POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES IF-1229333 INV#IF-1229333 - BOWER - EDMON AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.0( Freight 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.3E IF-1229450 INV#IF-1229450 - LIM - EDMONDS F AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.0( Freight 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.3E Page: 24 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher 219150 219151 219152 Voucher List City of Edmonds Date Vendor Invoice 3/24/2016 075432 075432 POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES (Continued) 3/24/2016 064088 PROTECTION ONE 1988948 3/24/2016 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET 291104 730531 20778 FELDENKRAIS 20781 FELDENKRAIS 20784 FELDENKRAIS 3.3.a Page: 25 PO # Description/Account Amoun Total : 1,804.7( ALARM MONITORING ANDERSON ( ui ALARM MONITORING FRANCESAN Y U 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 263.0 1 t ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII U ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I E 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 21.3< ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I o 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 21.3< 7v- ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 0 ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 0. 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 CL 33.5z Q ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 33.5z o ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF r 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 30.1 £ ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 38.5 1 N ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 0 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 16.7 , u) ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF lie U 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 15.0£ E Total: 473.4' 2 V 20778 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI 20778 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI E 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 579.0( 20781 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI 20781 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI Q 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 178.5( 20784 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI 20784 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 340.5( Total : 1,098.0( Page: 25 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219153 3/24/2016 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 14063 219154 3/24/2016 030695 PUMPTECH INC 219155 3/24/2016 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC PO # Description/Account WWTP - PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIF NOC number 11115- 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 Total: 0102066-IN WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, M Impeller Kit #K1122-C 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Shaft, 13.5' long stainless P/N 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Stub Shaft thru 215 Frame 06013691 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Ball Bearing Thrust Bearing Kit: K130 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Lower Bearing K1321 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Intermediate Bearings K1302, 91910E 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 0103516-IN WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, M Diaphragm - Hypalon Neoprene 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Total 00000162522 MARKER INSCRIPTION -LOOS MARKER INSCRIPTION -LOOS 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 00000162523 SHUTTER/NICH INSCRIPTION-EMP SHUTTER/NICH INSCRIPTION-EMP 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 00000162524 MARKER INSCRIPTION-CORWIN 3.3.a Page: 26 Amoun 1,400.0( Y 1,400.0( L) t U E .2 4,134.0( U 0 2,091.0( Fa 0 L 784.0( a a 558.0( 0 672.0( Z. 0 996.0( 4 N 877.3< CO) lid 124.0( . 0 13.4, V .r c a� 13.0E E 10,262.8( c� 105.0( 105.0( Page: 26 Packet Pg. 54 Q vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 27 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219155 3/24/2016 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC (Continued) MARKER INSCRIPTION-CORWIN 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 105.0( 00000162525 SHUTTER/NICHE INSCRIPTION -PE' SHUTTER/NICHE INSCRIPTION -PE' 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 105.0( Total: 420.0( 219156 3/24/2016 075404 RASTOVICH, MICHELE 16-005 CONSULTANT SUPPORT FOR DIVE Consultant support for Diversity 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 1,000.0( Total: 1,000.0( 219157 3/24/2016 066978 ROGERS MACHINERY 1024212 FS 16 - COMPRESSER SVC & REPF FS 16 - Compresser Svc & Repairs 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 2,356.7E 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 223.8� Total: 2.580.61 219158 3/24/2016 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC S3-824863 UNIT 122 - SENSOR Unit 122 - Sensor 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 S3-827200 UNIT 947 ANTI -FREEZE Unit 947 Anti -Freeze 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 S3-837037 UNIT 125 - SWITCH Unit 125 - Switch 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 S3-837394 FLEET - RETURNS Page: 27 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219158 3/24/2016 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 28 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Fleet - Returns 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -12.6E Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -1.2( S3-838952 UNIT 125 - SWITCH E Unit 125 - Switch M 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 53.0E 9.5% Sales Tax o 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.0, S3-841874 UNIT 122 - SENSOR o Unit 122 - Sensor Q- a 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 72.5E Q 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.9( S3-843294 UNIT 447 - ENGINE COOLER MOTO Unit 447 - Engine Cooler Motor and F cfl 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 221.3 0 4 9.5% Sales Tax N 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.0< o S3-843494 UNIT 447 - RELAY U) lid Unit 447 - Relay U 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 136.0E . 9.5% Sales Tax V 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.9: 4.; S3-845373 UNIT 36 - BRAKE SHOES a� Unit 36 - Brake Shoes E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 73.2. 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.9( Q S3-847984 UNIIT 122 - SENSOR Uniit 122 - Sensor 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 45.5: 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.3: Page: 28 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219158 3/24/2016 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 29 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) S3-851626 UNIT 455 - RINGS SUPPLIES Unit 455 - Rings Supplies Y 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 131.2( u 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.41 U E S3-851804 UNIT 36 - BRAKE DRUMS Unit 36 - Brake Drums 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 126.0E o 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.9 1 o S3-852955 FLEET RETURNS Q- Fleet Returns a Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -50.8'. 9.5% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -4.81 Z. S3-856006 UNIT 449 - OIL ADDITIVE to Unit 449 - Oil Additive 4 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 16.4E N 9.5% Sales Tax o 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.5( u) S3-856680 UNIT 29 - SUPPLIES U Unit 29 - Supplies E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.6,e V 9.5% Sales Tax • .r 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.2( c S3-869169 UNIT 447 - ATF E Unit 447 - ATF 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 50.7( Q 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.8, S3-869814 UNIT 324 - SUPPLIES Unit 324 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 118.7( 9.5% Sales Tax Page: 29 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219158 3/24/2016 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.Z _ S5-850133 UNIT 455 - BRAKE SUPPLIES ui Unit 455 - Brake Supplies m 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 68.Z 9.5% Sales Tax U E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.4£ 'Fa Total: 1,334.0( L) 0 219159 3/24/2016 073646 SIMPLEX GRINNELL 82325679 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, FI 75- Labor to replace spinkler heads o 423.000.76.535.80.48.23 1,005.0( Q. Twenty new sprinkler heads a a 423.000.76.535.80.48.23 300.0( 9.5% Sales Tax o 423.000.76.535.80.48.23 123.9£ Z. Total: 1,428.91 to T_ 219160 3/24/2016 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0196503-IN UNIT E109 -PARTS 4 N Unit E109 - Parts r� 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 316.8( N 0196505-IN UNIT E118PR & E119PR - AMBER LI Y U Unit E118PR & E119PR - Amber Ligh E 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 316.8( m 0196506-IN UNIT E123SO - AMBER LIGHTS V Unit E123SO - Amber Lights 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 316.8( 0196568-IN UNITS E118PR, E119PR, E120PR, E Units e118pr, e119pr, e120pr, e122er 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,733.3z Q Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 55.01 0196628-IN UNITS E111 PO, E112PO, E113PO Units el11 po, el12po, el13po - Stroh 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 334.5< 0196680-IN UNITS E109PO, E110PO - RED & BL Page: 30 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 31 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219160 3/24/2016 068489 SIRENNET.COM (Continued) Units e109po, e110po - Red & Blue L 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 720.0( Y Freight U 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 19.2' 0196861-IN UNIT E107PO - BLACK PERIMETER E Unit el07po - Black Perimeter Light 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 246.0( 0197093-IN UNIT 107 - CONSOLE BOX AND SUI o Unit 107 - Console Box and Supplies 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 963.1, o 0197098-IN UNIT E105PO - REAR PRISONER D Q- Unit E105PO - Rear Prisoner Divider a Q 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 314.2E 0197363--IN WOODWAY CAR - TRUNK ORGINIZ c Woodway Car - Trunk Orginizer v 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 340.5( to Freight 4 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 95.7E N 0197497-IN UNIT E105PO - DIVIDER KIT o Unit el05po - Divider Kit N 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 37.5( u Freight E 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 19.1E V 0197524-IN UNIT E107PO - LIGHT BAR ; Unit el07po - Light Bar a� 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 2,882.0( E Total: 8,710.8E U c� 219161 3/24/2016 074906 SITE WORKSHOP LLC 4025 VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE AR Q VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE AR 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 4,847.0' Total: 4,847.0' 219162 3/24/2016 036955 SKY NURSERY T-0609897 PM: PEA GRAVEL PM: PEA GRAVEL Page: 31 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219162 3/24/2016 036955 SKY NURSERY 219163 3/24/2016 075555 SNO CO FACILITIES MGMT 219164 3/24/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 T-0663289 PM: FERTIL-MULCH PM: FERTIL-MULCH 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 DEEDS 5482 5483 2002-0254-7 2002-6027-1 2003-9895-6 2004-9683-4 2006-1131-7 2006-5164-4 Total: DEEDS 5482 5483 BALLINGER LAN DEED 5482 BALLINGER LAND ACQi 126.000.64.594.75.61.00 DEED 5483 BALLINGER LAND ACQi 126.000.64.594.75.61.00 Total PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 3.3.a Page: 32 Amoun 39.0( N 3.7' L) t U E 700.0( 'Fa U 66.5( o 809.2' 0 L 0. a a 875.5' 0 793.8: 1,669.31 to 4 N M U E 449.9 , .2 V c 658.41 E t c� 113.4( Q 122.0� 536.1( Page: 32 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219164 3/24/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 33 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 2007-2302-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI _ TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI ui 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 24.9: U 2007-3984-5 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH U E 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 18.8: 2008-6924-6 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACF CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACF o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 52.2< Fa 2011-8453-8 HICKMAN PARK o HICKMAN PARK L Q. 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 a 126.6E Q 2013-8327-0 CITY PARK GAZEBO CITY PARK GAZEBO o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 18.5z v 2014-3123-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY to PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY 4 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 19.1( N 2014-3124-4 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC M 0 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC Y 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.2� u 2014-4175-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME E TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME 2 V 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 46.1E 2014-5305-7 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS .r CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 64.8< 2015-5174-4 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � c° SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � Q 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,006.8E 2019-4248-9 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 85.0E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 323.2, Page: 33 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219164 3/24/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 34 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 323.2, Y PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; U 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 323.2, PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : E 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 323.2z o 2021-1448-4 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 22.3( a 2022-5062-7 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED Q 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 18.5z o 2022-8945-0 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME co 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 90.9z 4 2022-9166-2 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1 � N CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1 1 o 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 4,646.7E Y 2024-3924-6 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER U CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER E 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,494.1 z V 2036-5215-1 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 a� 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 263.2E E 2044-2584-7 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / f° 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 139.0 0 Q 2202-1638-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 69.3' 2205-4757-4 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH Sl TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH Sl 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 82.6E Page: 34 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 35 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219164 3/24/2016 037375 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) Total: 13,817.8, 219165 3/24/2016 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 1000406762 INV#1000406762 CUST#SSH00095-1 ui SCSO RANGE USAGE 10 HR 2/24/1 Y U 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 580.0( t Total: 580.0( E 219166 3/24/2016 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2016-3039 INV 2016-3039 EDMONDS PD - JAN INMATE MEDS - JANUARY 2016 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 0 86.0£ Fa Total: 86.01 o 0 219167 3/24/2016 075495 SOFTWARE ONE US-PSI-466461 ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL a Adobe Acrobat Professional DC Licer Q 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 284.5' Adobe Acrobat Professional DC Licer 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 r 284.5' " 9.5% Sales Tax w 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 27.0: 4 9.5% Sales Tax N M 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 27.0: D Total: 623.0£ 219168 3/24/2016 075009 SOUNDVIEW DESIGN STUDIO 00010448 CRAZE SUMMER BROCHURE DESI E .2 CRAZE SUMMER BROCHURE DESI V 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 1,222.5( Total: 1,222.5( E 219169 3/24/2016 074990 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES 1026112 E4JB.SERVICES THRU FEBRUARY E4JB.Services thru February 2016 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 2,178.5z Q Total: 2,178.51 219170 3/24/2016 075558 SUCK IT UP CARPET CLEANING 16031101 OFFICE CHAIR UPHOLSTERY CLE/ Office Chair Upholstery Cleaning - 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 300.0( Page: 35 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 219170 3/24/2016 075558 075558 SUCK IT UP CARPET CLEANING (Continued) 219171 3/24/2016 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 03/10/2016 219172 3/24/2016 062693 US BANK 219173 3/24/2016 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0781 7000 Description/Account Total ; ANN SUBSCRIPTION #11897664 04) ANN SUBSCRIPTION -DAILY PAPER 001.000.41.521.10.49.00 Total CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES / CITY CC Christopher Framing - Council photos 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 Anthony's Homeport - Council Retrea 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 QFC - Council Retreat Refreshments 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 Affordable Housing Breakfast - Neil 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 Anthony's Homeport - Council Retrea 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 Walnut Street Coffee - Council Retrez 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 Edmonds IGA Market - Council Retre; 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 Affordable Housing Breakfast - Dave 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 US BANK- VISA- SHANE HOPE Air fare, shane hope APA natl 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 Total 9762057307 C/A 671247844-00001 Cell Service -Bldg 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 Cell Service-Eng 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 Cell Service Fac-Maint 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 3.3.a Page: 36 Amoun 300.0( ui U 213.7� t 213.7� E 2 U 0 67.2. 0 200.0( Q. a 89.3E Q 0 15.0( r to 473.9( 4 N 52.5( M 0 U) 9.4� E 15.0( 2 V .r c 559.9( E 1,482.41 �a 18.4: 96.9z 102.8: Page: 36 Packet Pg. 64 Q vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 37 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219173 3/24/2016 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) Cell Service -Parks Discovery Prograr 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 18.4< Y Cell Service Parks Maint U 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 62.3: Cell Service-PD E 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 Cell Service-PD 104 Fund 104.100.41.521.21.42.00 146.0( o Cell Service-PW Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 18.4< o Cell Service-PW Street/Storm Q- a 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 33.2 , Q Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 33.2( o Cell Service-PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 81.3( W Cell Service-PW Sewer 4 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 86.5' M Cell Service-WWTP c 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 45.6t Total: 1,073.2, U 219174 3/24/2016 045912 WASPC 2016-00483 INV 2016-00483 �° V ASSOCIATE DUES - MCCLURE 001.000.41.521.10.49.00 75.0( Total: 75.0( E t 219175 3/24/2016 026510 WCIA 101329 2016 UNDERGROUND STORAGE Ti 2016 PW Underground Storage Tank Q 511.000.77.548.68.46.00 1,632.0( 101339 SR CTR FLOOD INS POLICY #3000( Senior Center Flood Insurance Policy 001.000.39.518.90.46.00 1,997.0( Total: 3,629.0( Page: 37 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 38 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219176 3/24/2016 064800 WEHOP 630482 FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 747.0( Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 70.9 , Total: 817.9, E 219177 3/24/2016 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 6989 INV#6989 - EDMONDS PD U 1000 ANIMAL CONTROL IMPOUND p 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 250.0( Fa NEW SET UP FEE 0 0 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 L 30.0( a 9.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 26.6( Total: 306.6( o 219178 3/24/2016 074609 WEST COASTARMORY NORTH FEB-16 INV#FEB-16 CUST ID-EDMONDS PE r v BAY RENTAL 2/11/16 5 HR @$40 0 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 200.0( N RANGE USAGE-GAGNER 2/5/16 M 0 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 N 13.7(lie RANGE UASGE-JENSEN 2/16/16 U 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.7( E RANGE USAGE-PLOEGER 2/16/16 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.7( V RANGE USAGE-GAGNER 2/21/16 c 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.7( E 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 5.2( Total: 260.0( Q 219179 3/24/2016 075561 ZECK, LAURA BID-04182015 REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 2015 Reimbursement for supplies for BID 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 38.8E Total: 38.8E Page: 38 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 03/23/2016 5:55:56PM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 97 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 97 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.a Page: 39 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun Bank total : 385,299.6( Total vouchers : 385,299.6( ui Page: 39 Packet Pg. 67 U m t U E 2 U w- 0 0 0 L Q Q a 0 r O N M O N Y V E .2 U C N E L V fC a+ a+ Q vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219180 3/31/2016 075085 1 LINGUA LLC 219181 3/31/2016 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 130 ONLINE INTREPERTER FOR THE Y ONLINE INTREPERTER FOR THE Y 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 Total 15-36972 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 15-37342 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 15-37720 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 15-37721 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 15-37730 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 15-37751 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 15-37798 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 15-37851 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 15-37997 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 15-38064 INTERPRETER FEE 3.3.b Page: 1 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 2 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219181 3/31/2016 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC (Continued) INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 160.2z 15-38725 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 152.6E 15-38728 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 210.1( Total: 1,944.7( 219182 3/31/2016 071692 ACE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 1510834 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANICAL bandsaw blades 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 1,297.5( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 168.7E 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 139.Z Total: 1,605.51 219183 3/31/2016 000710 ALASKAN COPPER & BRASS 380313-1 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, M 2" SCH 40s- 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 228.3' Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 35.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 25.0' Total: 288.3, 219184 3/31/2016 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-156044 TRAFFIC - BOLLARD SIGN POST, A Traffic - Bollard Sign Post, and Base 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 189.7' 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 18.0, Total: 207.7: Page: 2 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219185 3/31/2016 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 219186 3/31/2016 075564 ANN JOHNSON 219187 3/31/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 21195 CAST BRONZE LIONS CLUB CAST BRONZE LIONS CLUB 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 194.2z Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 18.4E Total: 212.65 E 1-23875 #4222-2591490 UTILITY REFUND 2 U #4222-2591490 Utility refund p 411.000.233.000 43.1 Fa Total: 43.11 p L Q 1988517291 WWTP - UNIFORMS, MATS AND TO a Q uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.0z c mats and towels r 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 81.0z 9.5% Sales Tax to 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.2� M 9.5% Sales Tax c 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 7.7( N 1988517292 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE U PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE E 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 36.2 2 1988517293 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS V FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 18.1, E 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.7, 1988521375 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.3: PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 5.0( PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 5.0( Page: 3 Packet Pg. 70 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219187 3/31/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 219188 3/31/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 4 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 5.0( Y PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: U 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 5.0( PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: E 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.11 o 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.4E o 9.5% Sales Tax a 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.4E Q 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.4E o 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.4£ W 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.4£ M 1988521376 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT c FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS Y 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 15.6, U FLEET DIVISION MATS E 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 13.6E V 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.4E 9.5% Sales Tax E t 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.3( Total: 209.4' Q 86447 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #800 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 116.4E UB Outsourcing area #800 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 116.4£ Page: 4 Packet Pg. 71 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219188 3/31/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 5 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) UB Outsourcing area #800 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 120.0' Y UB Outsourcing area #800 Postage U 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 436.8' UB Outsourcing area #800 Postage E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 436.8' 9.6% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 11.1E o 9.6% Sales Tax > 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 11.1E o 9.6% Sales Tax a 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 11.5< Q 86536 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 90.8E UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing co 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 93.6: UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage M 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 340.1 � c UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage Y 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 340.1 E U 9.6% Sales Tax E 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 8.7< V 9.6% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 8.7< 9.6% Sales Tax E t 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 8.9E UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing Q 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 90.8E 86652 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 124.7, UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 124.7, Page: 5 Packet Pg. 72 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 6 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219188 3/31/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 128.5( Y UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage U 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 466.8E UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 9.6% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 11.9 , o 9.6% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 11.9 1 o 9.6% Sales Tax a 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 12.3z Q 86726 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing c 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 89.9� UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing co 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 89.9� UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing M 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 92.7: c UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage Y 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 335.8, U UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 335.8' V 9.6% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 8.6z 9.6% Sales Tax E t 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 8.6z 9.6% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 8.9( 86776 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 23.0E UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 23.0E Page: 6 Packet Pg. 73 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 7 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219188 3/31/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER (Continued) UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 23.7, Y UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 107.1 UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 107.1 £ 9.6% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 2.2. o 9.6% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 2.2, o 9.6% Sales Tax a 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 2.2( Q 87010 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing c 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 37.3� UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing cfl 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 37.3� UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing M 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 38.5' c UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage Y 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 140.1E U UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 140.1E V 9.6% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 3.5£ 9.6% Sales Tax E t 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 3.5£ 9.6% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 3.7( Total: 5,256.5' 219189 3/31/2016 001527 AWWA 7001179541 WATER - ANNUAL DUES- J WAITE, Water - Annual Dues- J Waite, Water 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 1,947.0( Page: 7 Packet Pg. 74 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219189 3/31/2016 001527 001527 AWWA (Continued) Total: 1,947.0( 219190 3/31/2016 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 2O15-178 INV 2015-178 EDMONDS PD - PRE-1 PRE -EMPLOY EXAM - BOONE 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 225.0( Total: 225.0( 219191 3/31/2016 071348 BERGERABAM 314216 E4MB.SERVICES THRU 3/11/16 E4MB.Services thru 3/11/16 016.000.66.518.30.41.00 8,119.4E Total: 8,119.4E 219192 3/31/2016 065739 BOBBY WOLFORD TRUCKING & 7851 STORM - DUMP FEES Storm - Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 160.0( 8229 STORM - DUMP FEES Storm - Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 320.0( Total: 480.0( 219193 3/31/2016 075572 BOHOUSSOU, SABINE 3/21 REFUND 3/21/16 REFUND CLASS CANCELLE 3/25/16 REFUND CLASS CANCELLE 001.000.239.200 9.0( Total: 9.0( 219194 3/31/2016 067391 BRAT WEAR 18236 INV#18236 - EDMONDS PD - PECK S/S TRADITIONAL SHIRTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 118.0( L/S TRADITIONAL SHIRTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 128.0( EMBROIDER NAME ON 3 SHIRTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 24.0( UNIFORM PANTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 178.0( 3" CLIP ON TIE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 8.9E Page: 8 Packet Pg. 75 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219194 3/31/2016 067391 BRAT WEAR 219195 3/31/2016 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 9 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) SAFETY BREAKAWAY VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 39.9( Y BASKETWEAVE PANT BELT U 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 20.7E INNER BELT LINER E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 51.6: o 18356 INV#18356 - EDMONDS PD - BICKLI INNER BELT LINER o 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 25.7E 0- DUTY BELT Q 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 59.0( 9.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 8.0E Total : 687.8, 20708 YOGA 20708 YOGA INSTRUCTION M 20708 YOGA INSTRUCTION M 0 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 382.1, u) 20711 YOGA 20711 YOGA INSTRUCTION U 20711 YOGA INSTRUCTION E 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 329.4( V 20714 YOGA 20714 YOGA INSTRUCTION .. 20714 YOGA INSTRUCTION .r 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 a� 391.5( E 20717 YOGA 20717 YOGA INSTRUCTION 20717 YOGA INSTRUCTION f° 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 614.2E Q 20720 YOGA 20720 YOGA INSTRUCTION 20720 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 310.9E 20721 YOGA 20721 YOGA INSTRUCTION 20721 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 722.2E Page: 9 Packet Pg. 76 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219195 3/31/2016 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 219196 3/31/2016 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 219197 3/31/2016 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 219198 3/31/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 20852 PILATES YOGA F 20852 PILATES YOGA FUSION INST 20852 PILATES YOGA FUSION INST 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Tota I : 314683 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - i Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Crushed 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Crushed 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Crushed 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Crushed 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Tota I : 92763244 STREET -CEMENT Street - Cement 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 9.6% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 15896133 PW ADMIN COPIER PW Office Copier 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 PW Office Copier Total 3.3.b Page: 10 Page: 10 Packet Pg. 77 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219198 3/31/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 11 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 38.8E PW Office Copier Y 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 38.8E u PW Office Copier M 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 27.4, E PW Office Copier M 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 27.4, PW Office Copier o 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 27.4' 9.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 6.5' a 9.5% Sales Tax Q 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 3.6E 9.5% Sales Tax o 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 3.6� 9.5% Sales Tax cfl 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 2.6' 9.5% Sales Tax `? 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 M 2.6' c 9.5% Sales Tax Y 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 2.5E U 15896134 WATER SEWER COPIER E Water Sewer Copier V 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 70.6E Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 70.6E E 9.5% Sales Tax U 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 6.7, Q 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 6.7' 15911826 WWTP - COPIER RENTAL monthly copier rental 423.000.76.535.80.45.41 85.8( Total: 490M Page: 11 Packet Pg. 78 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219199 3/31/2016 075023 CAROLYN DOUGLAS COMMUNICATION 52 219200 219201 3/31/2016 003320 CASCADE MACHINERY & ELECTRIC 436745 3/31/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC 94322741138 9432656906 9432664901 9432754950 9432877522 PO # Description/Account COMMUNICATIONS/COMMUNITY O Communications/community outreacl• 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Total ; WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, M BALDOR COOLING FAN 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Total ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 3.3.b Page: 12 Amoun 2,500.0( Y 2,500.0( L) t U E .2 26.5( U 0 8.2E Fa 0 L 3.3( a 38.0E Q 0 287.0( 27.2 1 M M 0 U) 232.1( U E 22.0E 2 V 265.0( 25.1 £ Page: 12 Packet Pg. 79 Q vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219201 3/31/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 9432885287 9432892754 219202 3/31/2016 075569 CENTRAL WA COMP MENTAL HEALTH 00184888 219203 3/31/2016 074370 CERILLIANT CORPORATION 411668 219204 3/31/2016 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 46972819 PO # Description/Account 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 COPY OF RECORD COPY OF RECORD 001.000.23.523.30.49.00 Total Total: W WTP - PROFESSIONAL SERVICE lab tests 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 Total INV#46972819 ACCT#7898305185-E FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE-POFF 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 CAR WASH FOR NARCS VEHICLE 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE-POFF 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 CAR WASH FOR NARCS VEHICLE 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE-POFF 3.3.b Page: 13 Page: 13 Packet Pg. 80 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 14 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219204 3/31/2016 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS (Continued) 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 17.3' CAR WASH FOR NARCS VEHICLE 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 6.0( FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE-POFF 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 19.7( TAX EXEMPT FILING FEE 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 1.2: Total: 124.0i 219205 3/31/2016 066580 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO 500019425-2 E1CA.ESD RECORDING FEE E1CA.ESD Recording Fee 112.000.68.595.20.61.00 80.0( Total: 80.0( 219206 3/31/2016 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 1-218359-279832 WWTP - FLOW METER 2203 N 2051 WWTP FLOW METER 2203 N 205T 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 16.6z Total: 16.61 219207 3/31/2016 004095 COASTWIDE LABS NW2854367 WWTP - SUPPLIES, FACILITIES SaniCloth Plus (case) 423.000.76.535.80.31.23 71.3( 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.23 6.7 1 Total: 78.0 , 219208 3/31/2016 074448 COBURN, DOUG 3/24 GYM ATTENDANT 3/24/16 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTEND 3/24/16 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTEND 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 32.5( Total: 32.5( 219209 3/31/2016 071680 CODE 4 LLC 2569 INV#2569 - EDMONDS PD STREAMLIGHT TLR-1 HL-- 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 379.5( STREAMLIGHT TLR-1 HL (SWAT) -- Page: 14 Packet Pg. 81 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219209 3/31/2016 071680 CODE 4 LLC (Continued) 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 Total: 219210 3/31/2016 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-G1537 NEW POLICE E110PO VEHICLE New Police E110PO Vehicle 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Total: 219211 3/31/2016 005965 CUES INC 451936 SEWER - TV TRUCK ADAPTER Sewer - TV Truck Adapter 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Total: 219212 3/31/2016 068190 DATEC INC 32576 INV#32576 - EDMONDS PD PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPU' 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 256GB SSD DRIVE 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 4TH/5TH YR WARRANTY EXTENSIC 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 4GB RAM 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 CF-30 VEH MOUNT REPLICATOR 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 INTERFACE PLATE 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 LIND ADAPTOR 3.3.b Page: 15 Page: 15 Packet Pg. 82 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219212 3/31/2016 068190 DATEC INC (Continued) 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Tota I : 219213 3/31/2016 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03 408823 INV#408823 - EDMONDS PD CALIBRATE #FH10284 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-02444 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-03892 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-14989 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-15003 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #PL22598 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 FUELSURCHARGE 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 Total 219214 3/31/2016 006635 DEPT OF LICENSING CW20160001 APPLICATION FEE FOR NOTORY APPLICATION FEE FOR NOTARY LI 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 Total 219215 3/31/2016 070864 DEX MEDIA 610026351581 C/A730211599 Basic e-commerce hosting 03/02/16 - 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 610026351707 C/A 730211600 03/2016 Web Hosting for Internet 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 3.3.b Page: 16 Page: 16 Packet Pg. 83 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219215 3/31/2016 070864 070864 DEX MEDIA 219216 3/31/2016 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 219217 3/31/2016 068292 EDGEANALYTICAL Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 16-3645 16-03116 219218 3/31/2016 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3/18 REFUND 219219 3/31/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 3-03575 3-07490 3-07525 3-07709 3-09350 3-09800 PO # Description/Account Total: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3/22/16 03/22/2016 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE: 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Total WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE Water Quality - Water Samples Monit 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 Total 3/18/16 REFUND CANCELLATION 3/18/16 REFUND CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 Total LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S' LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S' 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING F HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING F 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R 3.3.b Page: 17 Amoun 69.9( N U 303.6( t 303.6( E 2 U 0 1,096.0( Fa 1,096.0( o L Q a a 200.0( -q 200.0( o r 44.7' M M 0 U) lid 302.4( 0 .2 V 83.8( c a� E c� E:ic?EY( Page: 17 Packet Pg. 84 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219219 3/31/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 3-29875 CBL-I:.X 219220 3/31/2016 075200 EDUARDO ZALDIBAR 12318 219221 3/31/2016 075566 EHRBAR, PAMELA BID-03302016 219222 3/31/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR34694 AR34850 AR34854 PO # Description/Account LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 c SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 c 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total INTERPRETER FEE FOR PDA INTERPRETER FEE FOR PDA 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total ADMIN SERVICES, REIMBURSEMEI Reimbursement of printing costs for 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 Administrative services 3/1-15/2016 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Administrative services 2/2016 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total COPIER MAINT COPIER MAINT 001.000.23.523.30.48.00 MK5532 CITY CLERK OVERAGE CITY CLERKS FRONT RECEPTION 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 FLEET COPY USE Fleet Copy Use 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.3.b Page: 18 Page: 18 Packet Pg. 85 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 19 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219222 3/31/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.8E Y AR34855 WATER SEWER COPY USE U Water Sewer Copy Use 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.8. E Water Sewer Copy Use M 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.8' 9.5% Sales Tax o 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.0< 9.5% Sales Tax o 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.0: a AR34856 PW COPY USE Q PW Copy Use 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 31.6E o PW Copy Use 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 17.9z to PW Copy Use 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 17.9z c? PW Copy Use o 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 12.6( Y PW Copy Use U 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 12.6( •� PW Copy Use V 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.6( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 3.0' E 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 1.7( Q 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 1.7( 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.2( 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.2( Page: 19 Packet Pg. 86 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 20 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219222 3/31/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.2' AR35450 P&R PRINTER C1030 #A6995 P&R PRINTER C1030 #A6995 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 28.2E AR35820 P&R COPIER C5051 #A7027 P&R COPIER C5051 #A7027 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 225.4: Total: 419.0E 219223 3/31/2016 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0116605-IN INV#0116605-IN ACCT#0011847 - E[ BUGLER DOMED BADGE (DAWSO� 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 98.0( NAME ON BADGE (DAWSON) 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 6.0( RUSH PRODUCTION FEE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 24.5( PACKING, MATERIAL FEE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 4.5( Freight 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 32.0( Total: 165.0( 219224 3/31/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH687088 E1CA.STORMWATER NPDES NOTI( E1CA.Stormwater NPDES Notice 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 113.5, EDH689245 CITY NOTICES PUBLIC HEARING CITY NOTICES - 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 117.6' EDH689269 CITY ORDINANCE 4022 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4022 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 25.8( Tota I : 256.9; 219225 3/31/2016 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 127589 PM: RECT TUBE, CHANNEL Page: 20 Packet Pg. 87 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219225 3/31/2016 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC (Continued) PM: RECT TUBE, CHANNEL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 224.4( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 21.3, Tota I : 245.7; 219226 3/31/2016 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU38898 WATER - CABLE PROTECTORS Water - Cable Protectors 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,972.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 187.3z WAMOU38989 PM: PAN HEAD SMS PM: PAN HEAD SMS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.3( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.01 Total: 2,159.61 219227 3/31/2016 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0499259 WATER METER INVENTORY #2025 Water Meter Inventory #2025 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,478.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 140.4' 0500247 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, M STAINLES STEEL 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 108.8, 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 10.3z Total: 1,737.5 , 219228 3/31/2016 073265 FREESE LAW OFFICES INC PS 3Z809185/5Z477417 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 600.0( Total: 600.0( Page: 21 Packet Pg. 88 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219229 3/31/2016 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 22 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETRl SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 30.8 1 Y 253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES U TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 U 161.3: E TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 299.6, U 253-012-9189 WWTP - AUTODIALER, 1 VOICE GR o WWTP - AUTODIALER - 1 VOICE GI 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 41.Z o 253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE Q- TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE a Q 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.7' TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.5� Z. 253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE cfl TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 46.6z r? TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE o 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 86.6, Y 253-017-7256 WWTP - VOICE GRADE AND SPECI U WWTP - VOICE GRADE DATA BRID, E 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 223.4E ;° 425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE; CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE a� 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 68.0E E 425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} f° 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 131.0, Q 425-771-5553 WWTP - TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGR) WWTP TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGRAI 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 114.4,' 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION AI 00 1. 000. 66.518.30.42. 00 131.0, Page: 22 Packet Pg. 89 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219229 3/31/2016 011900 FRONTIER (Continued) 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIALACCI LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Tota I : 219230 3/31/2016 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL 005062395 1NV#005062395 ACCT#1 00 1074529 ACADIA GORETEX BOOTS -PECK 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.6% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Total: 219231 3/31/2016 075163 GARCIA-GARCIA, CESAR 11939 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 12025 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 12200 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total: 219232 3/31/2016 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 14143017 WATER INVENTORY - #476 W-VALV Water Inventory - #476 W-VALVBR-0; 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 #492 W-VALVCI-02-010 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 #145 W-FLNGBR-01-010 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 #328 W-MTRLIDDI-02-010 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 Water Parts 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 3.3.b Page: 23 Page: 23 Packet Pg. 90 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219232 3/31/2016 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 204.7( 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 149.4: 14154237 WATER - PARTS Water - Parts 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 789.0: 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 74.9( 14154241 WATER - REPAIRS FOR THE TAPM Water -Repairs for the Tapmate II 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 334.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 31.7: Total: 5,312.2( 219233 3/31/2016 071417 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD F121155 STORM - PIPE SUPPLIES Storm - Pipe Supplies 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 308.0( 7.7% sales tax 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 23.7, F158083 STORM - SUPPLIES Storm - Supplies 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 237.3( 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 22.5( Total: 591.7( 219234 3/31/2016 075573 HENLEY WA 15 LLC 7-06800 #695653RT UTILITY REFUND #695653RT Utility refund - received 411.000.233.000 101.5: Total: 101.5: 219235 3/31/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1015101 CITY HALL - DEV SVC - PERMIT CO City Hall - Dev Svc - Permit Counter 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 153.2z Page: 24 Packet Pg. 91 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 25 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219235 3/31/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.5( Y 1020109 STREET -PRUNERS Street - Pruners 111.000.68.542.71.35.00 U 51.2( E 9.5% Sales Tax M 111.000.68.542.71.35.00 4.8( 1031406 CITY HALL - DEV SVC PERMIT COU o City Hall - Dev Svc Permit Counter 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 62.6' o 9.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.9E Q 14044 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.1 z 9.5% Sales Tax cfl 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.70 1881904 SEWER - TOOL BOX FOR TV TRUC C? Sewer - Tool Box for TV Truck o 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 499.0( u) 9.6% Sales Tax U 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 47.9( . 2022257 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES V Fac Maint - Supplies • .r 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 39.9E 9.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.8( 21362 TRAFFIC - STEP LADDER FOR TRU Q Traffic - Step Ladder for truck 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 19.9E 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 1.9( 22536 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint Shop Supplies Page: 25 Packet Pg. 92 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 26 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219235 3/31/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.9( _ 9.5% Sales Tax ui 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.6' U 2590002 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies U E 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 4.6. 'Fa 9.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.4, o 3013724 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Shop Supplies i 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 542.2( a 9.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 51.5' 3023332 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES c Traffic - Supplies v 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 17.9z to 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1.7( r? 3971420 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES o Fac Maint Shop Supplies N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 50.0( u 9.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.7E V 4020907 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES; Fac Maint - Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 139.8E E 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.2E 4023259 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES Q Fac Maint - Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 64.9z 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.1 , 6022952 CITY HALL DEV SVC PERMIT COUN Page: 26 Packet Pg. 93 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219235 3/31/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 219236 3/31/2016 072041 IBS INCORPORATED Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 27 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) City Hall Dev Svc Permit Counter 17 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.3E Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.4, 62846 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES E Traffic - Supplies M 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 246.5( 9.5% Sales Tax o 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 23.4, > 9014113 PS - PARTS FOR A LAV o PS - Parts for a Lav Q- a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 18.4E Q 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.7( 9014118 FAC MAINT SHOP - SUPPLIES Fac Maint Shop - Supplies cfl 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 287.6, 9.5% Sales Tax r? 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 27.3, o 9083506 SEWER - MOSS KILLER FOR LIFT : Y Sewer - Moss Killer for Lift Stations U 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 25.8E . 9.5% Sales Tax V 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.4( 91853 STORM - SUPPLIES a� Storm - Supplies E 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 27.7E 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 2.6z Q Total : 2,521.5( 610531--1 TRAFFIC - BORE BLADES Traffic - Bore Blades 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 30.1 E Freight Page: 27 Packet Pg. 94 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219236 3/31/2016 072041 IBS INCORPORATED (Continued) 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 610532-1 TRAFFIC - TIE WRAPS Traffic - Tie Wraps 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total: 219237 3/31/2016 072831 INDEPENDENT INC 6083 UNIT 947 - EXTERIOR REPAIRS Unit 947 - Exterior Repairs 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Total 219238 3/31/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2747206 WWTP - SUPPLIES, OFFICE Purell 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 2749910 WWTP - OFFICE FURNISHINGS Alera Eon Series Chair (front desk) 423.000.76.535.80.31.23 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.23 2751058 WWTP - RETURN OF WRONG FUR return of wrong Purell 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 2756771 WWTP - SUPPLIES, OFFICE 3.3.b Page: 28 Page: 28 Packet Pg. 95 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 29 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219238 3/31/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued) Visitor Registration Book 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 19.4< 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 1.8E 2768114 SUPPLIES -DRY ERASE SUPPLIES -DRY ERASE SET, PENCI 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 23.1' 2774473 STAMPS STAMPS 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 361.9< Total: 947.3E 219239 3/31/2016 072110 INFORMATION DISPLAY COMPANY 6948 TRAFFIC - WINDOW Traffic - Window 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 89.0( Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 20.0( Total: 109.0( 219240 3/31/2016 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS 906-60432 FLEET SHOP - SUPPLIES Fleet Shop - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 136.5E 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 12.9E 906-607004 UNITS E118PR, E119PR - LITES Units E118PR, E119PR - Lites 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 722.6, 9.5% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 68.6E 906-607599 UNITS E118PR, E119PR - LITES Units E118PR, E119PR - Lites 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 445.7z 9.5% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 42.3z Page: 29 Packet Pg. 96 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 30 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219240 3/31/2016 069040 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS (Continued) Total: 1,428.81 219241 3/31/2016 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10005661 PM: CABLE TIES, DIESEL FIRE, SE/ PM: CABLE TIES, DIESEL FIRE, SE/ 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 96.2� 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.1 E Total: 105.41 219242 3/31/2016 069851 JACKYE'S ENTERPRISES INC 10754 STREET/STORM - WORK WEAR PF Street/Storm - Work Wear Printing 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 402.2E Street/Storm - Work Wear Printing 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 402.2E 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 38.2, 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 38.2( Total: 880.9, 219243 3/31/2016 072530 JACOBSEN'S MARINE 32814 219244 3/31/2016 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 684009 219245 3/31/2016 074838 KOBYLK, JEFF JK 32816 PM: VESTS PM: VESTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total WWTP - SUPPLIES, HYPOCHLORII hypochlorite, 4763 gallons 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 Total BAT CERT TEST 1 BAT Cert Test 1 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 Total Page: 30 Packet Pg. 97 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219246 3/31/2016 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 126 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 127 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 128 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total: 219247 3/31/2016 067631 LODESTAR COMPANY INC 142664 WWTP - HVAC SERVICE HVAC SERVICE 423.000.76.535.80.48.23 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.23 Total: 219248 3/31/2016 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 948956 PM: MOWER PARTS PM: MOWER PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total: 219249 3/31/2016 069862 MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND 1438-15 ECDC REWRITE PROFESSIONAL SERCVICES-ECDC 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total: 219250 3/31/2016 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 692291-00 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Tota I : 3.3.b Page: 31 Page: 31 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 32 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219251 3/31/2016 074099 MARTIN, GARY 3/17 YOGA SUBSTITUT 3/17/16 YOGA SUBSTITUTION 2070 3/17/16 YOGA SUBSTITUTION 2070 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 75.0E Y Total: 75.0E L) m t 219252 3/31/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 52694972 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MAINTENANCE U Standard -Wall Brass Threaded Pipe E 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 32.3: 6 Freight p 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 6.11 52960382 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANICAL 0 0 303 Steinless Steel Tight -tolerance Q. 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 42.5( Q Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 7.2: o Total: 88.2( v 219253 3/31/2016 062926 METAL SHORTS INC 76453 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, M 2' SOL HRMS 3 XX HEAVY M 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 125.0( M 9.5% Sales Tax CD 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 14.2� Freight E 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 25.3E 2 Total: 164.61 V 219254 3/31/2016 072223 MILLER, DOUG 3/22 GYM MONITOR 3/22/16 VOLLEYBALL GYM MONITO c 3/22/16 VOLLEYBALL GYM MONITO 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 32.5( Total: 219255 3/31/2016 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 227198 WATER - STIHL RENTAL FEES Water - Stihl Rental Fees 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 60.5( 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 5.7: Page: 32 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 33 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219255 3/31/2016 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC (Continued) 231175 PM: GATORLINE, HOSE CONNECT( PM: MOWER PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 83.8( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.9( Total: 158.0' 219256 3/31/2016 075568 MORISAWA, KEN 3/22 ON THE FENCE 3/22/16 ON THE FENCE ART INSTAL 3/22/16 ON THE FENCE ART INSTAL 117.200.64.575.50.41.00 500.0( Total: 500.0( 219257 3/31/2016 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC ME93628 UNIT G01 - THERMOSTAT KIT Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.9E 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.6' Unit G01 - Thermostat Kit 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 123.8( 219258 3/31/2016 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 14-1605-12 15-1662-11 219259 3/31/2016 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 4389575 Total : WATER SUPPLY OPERATION EVAL WATER SUPPLY OPERATION EVAL 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 E4JC.SERVICES THRU 2/29/16 E4JC.Services thru 2/29/16 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 Total CITY PARK TEMPORARY FENCING CITY PARK TEMPORARY FENCING 132.000.64.594.76.65.00 9.5% Sales Tax 132.000.64.594.76.65.00 Total Page: 33 Packet Pg. 100 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219260 3/31/2016 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 219261 3/31/2016 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 34 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 0430203-IN STORM -RAIN WARE 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 3.5z Y Storm -Rain Ware L) 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 37.2( 0432276-IN TRAFFIC - CONVEX MIRROR FOR ( E Traffic - Convex Mirror for OVD M 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 160.0( 9.5% Sales Tax o 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 15.2( Total: 215.9� o Q. 0576115-IN FLEET FILTER INVENTORY CL a Fleet Filter Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 64.3( c 9.5% Sales Tax r 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 6.1, to 0576874-IN FLEET FILTER INVENTORY Fleet Filter Inventory M 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 21.1' c 9.5% Sales Tax Y 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 2.0( u 0576925-IN UNIT 47 - FILTER E Unit 47 - Filter 2 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 24.50 V 9.5% Sales Tax .r 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 a� 2.3z E 0577032-IN UNIT 47 - FILTER Unit 47 - Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 41.0( Q Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.8z 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.9: 0578988-IN WWTP - SUPPLIES, OPERATING 2 drums hipersyn 320-• Page: 34 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 35 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219261 3/31/2016 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 5,101.M 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 484.6' Total: 5,762.91 219262 3/31/2016 075571 NORPOINT SHOOTING CENTER LLC 20160 INV#20160 - EDMONDS PD BAY RENTAL FOR TRAINING 1/14/11 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 400.0( BEFORE HRS STARTING TIME 1/14, 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 25.0( 8.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 37.4( Total: 462.4( 219263 3/31/2016 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S7018319.001 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, El (2) DIALIGHT FLD276NC2NG SAFE: 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 1,680.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 159.6( 219264 3/31/2016 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 219265 3/31/2016 025690 NOYES, KARIN 219266 3/31/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 2-1595834 000 00 639 414092 Total : YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total PLANNING BOARD MINUTES PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total WATER - TONER FOR PRINTERS Water - Toner for Printers 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax Page: 35 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219266 3/31/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 219267 3/31/2016 060945 PACIFIC POWER BATTERIES 219268 3/31/2016 065051 PARAMETRIX INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 415536 STREET - PROTECTIVE SHEETS F( Street - Protective Sheets for Signan( 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 429558 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 460625 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Total: 19004189 UNIT 34 - BATTERY Unit 34 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 19004270 UNIT 41 -SUPPLIES Unit 41 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total: 21-23739 WWTP- PLC & SCADA SYSTEM UP Phase 04: PLC-301 Replacement Sei 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 Phase 06: PLC-601 Replace 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 3.3.b Page: 36 Page: 36 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219268 3/31/2016 065051 PARAMETRIX INC (Continued) Phase 11: UL Inspector 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 Total 219269 3/31/2016 075257 PCE PACIFIC INC 203502 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, EI FSMR98H-13 1/2", 25-75, Trim 6 41 423.000.76.535.80.48.22 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.22 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.22 Total 219270 3/31/2016 074931 PEAK CMS LLC 13415 CABLE INSTALLATION FOR COUNC Cable installation for Council Chambe 016.000.66.594.19.64.00 Total 219271 3/31/2016 073070 PERRINE, JULIE 20751 CLAY 20751 CLAY EXPLORATION INSTRL 20751 CLAY EXPLORATION INSTRL 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total 219272 3/31/2016 007800 PETTY CASH FE138-MAR24 FEB8 THRU MAR24 PETTY CASH Mileage of ICC Meeting -Rob English 001.000.67.518.21.43.00 Parking for ICC Metting - Rob English 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 Gas when City pumps were down - D, 511.000.77.548.68.43.00 Supplies for Kitchen - Diane Cunningl 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 Mileage and parking for PSRC 001.000.62.558.60.43.00 Snohomish County Clerks Conferenc, 3.3.b Page: 37 Page: 37 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219272 3/31/2016 007800 PETTY CASH (Continued) 219273 3/31/2016 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 1963106 219274 3/31/2016 075432 POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES 1980446 J001844 PO # Description/Account 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 Travel for meeting - Rob Chave 001.000.62.558.60.43.00 Batteries for smoke detectors - Sue 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 Mileage to meeting in Everett - Dave 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 Total WWTP - SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL PHI PL S 9W 827 2P ALTO 14867 pn 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 WWTP - SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL HOF AHC110E CORROSION -INHIBIT 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 WWTP - SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL HEAT -SHRINK TUBING 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 Total IF-1229228 INV#IF-1229228 -SMITH - EDMOND,' AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 IF-1229254 INV#IF-1229254 - MILLS - EDMOND; AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Freight 3.3.b Page: 38 Amoun 22.0( N 24.9( L) t U 17.3E E 0 18.9( 187.1$ 0 566.5< M 53.8, c U) lid 245.7( E 23.3z V 921.5E E t �a 896.0( Q 7.5z Page: 38 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 39 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219274 3/31/2016 075432 POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES (Continued) 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 8.5E _ IF-1229258 INV#IF1229258 -MACHADO - EDMO ui AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST U 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 m 896.0( Freight U E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 7.5z IF-1229468 INV#IF-1229468 - FROLAND - EDMC AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST o 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.0( Fa Freight i 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.3E a IF-1229474 INV#IF-1229474 - ANDERSON - EDN Q AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.0( o Freight v 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 5.9( to IF-1229560 INV#IF-1229560 - COMPAAN - EDM( AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST M 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.0( o Freight N lie 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.3E u IF-1231150 INV#IF-1231150 - PECK - EDMONDc E AXIIIA BALLISTIC VEST 2 V 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.0(; Freight 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 a� 7.9� E Total: 6,322.21 U c� 219275 3/31/2016 064167 POLLARD WATER 0036923 WATER - FIRE HOSE FOR HYDRAN Q Water - Fire Hose for Hydrants 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 285.0( Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 30.4E 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 29.9 , Page: 39 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219275 3/31/2016 064167 064167 POLLARD WATER (Continued) 219276 3/31/2016 073231 POLYDYNE INC 1036084 219277 3/31/2016 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 218082 219278 3/31/2016 064088 PROTECTION ONE 219279 3/31/2016 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 291104 200000704821 200002411383 200007876143 200011439656 200016558856 200016815843 3.3.b Page: 40 PO # Description/Account Amoun Total : 345.4, WWTP - SUPPLIES, POLYMER ui ploymer darifloc 423.000.76.535.80.31.51 8,184.0( t Total: 8,184.0( SEWER - TO CUES- CAMERA SHIPI 2 Sewer - To Cues- Camera Shipping F U 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 o 590.4! Total: Ta 590.4! o L ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII a ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I Q 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 21.3< ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 r 21.3: " Total : 42.6E FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( C? FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( o 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,639.6E Y YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN U YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 152.7( V OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON a� 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 297.5E E FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE Q 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 268.3E CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 202.0E FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / Page: 40 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 41 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219279 3/31/2016 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 734.1E _ 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 ui FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 U 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 m 334.0E 200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � U E SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 314.4z 200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : o PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : 75- 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 23.9: o PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : L Q. 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 a 91.0( Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 91.0( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; v 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 91.0( to PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 91.0( r? PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : o 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 90.91 Y 200021829581 WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 3� U WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 0( E 423.000.76.535.80.47.63 758.5, V 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE; CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE a� 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 193.5E E Total: 5,374.1' u �a 219280 3/31/2016 075565 PVP COMMUNICATIONS 22863 UNIT E111PO, 112PO, 113PO - HELD Q Unit E111 PO, 112PO, 113PO - Helme 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 747.0( Motor -One Speakermic 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,785.0( Motor -one Helmet Interface 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 2,385.0( Page: 41 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 42 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219280 3/31/2016 075565 PVP COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 58.6� Total 219281 3/31/2016 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 109684 INV#109684 - EDMONDS PD TOW 1992 CHEVY CAPRICE #APS6 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 109996 INV#109996 - EDMONDS PD TOW 2000 SUBARU #AUU6876 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 110070 INV#110070 - EDMONDS PD TOW 2000 SUBARU #AUU6876 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 STORAGE FOR SUBARU #AUU687E 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total 219282 3/31/2016 075570 RADIA INC PS Z25CH29 PRE -EMPLOYMENT SCREENING Pre -employment screening 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 Total 219283 3/31/2016 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 1602007 STREET - CEDAR ST TOPOGRAPHI Street - Cedar St Topographic/ Right 111.000.68.542.31.41.00 Total 219284 3/31/2016 075288 RODARTE CONSTRUCTION INC E7AC.Pmt 10 E7AC & E2AD PMT 10 THRU 2/29/1E E7AC.Pmt 10 thru 2/29/16 Page: 42 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 43 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219284 3/31/2016 075288 RODARTE CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) 112.000.68.595.33.65.00 113,577.3� _ E2AD.Pmt 10 thru 2/29/16 ui 112.000.68.595.33.65.00 23,001.1( U Total: 136,578.45 219285 3/31/2016 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-007706A UNIT 447 - BATTERY E Unit 447 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 127.5E o 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.1, p 5-007706B UNIT E105PO - BATTERY Q. Unit E105PO - Battery Q- a 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 127.5( 9.5% Sales Tax o 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 12.1 , Z. 5-008067 UNIT 104 - BATTERY W Unit 104 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 79.2( M 9.5% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 7.5< u) Total: 366.1E U E 219286 3/31/2016 071902 ROMMEL, LINDA 3/23 REFUND 3/23/16 REFUND cy 3/23 REFUND V 001.000.239.200 80.0( Total: 80.0( t 219287 3/31/2016 067003 SCHOETTLE, GEORGE 032316 WWTP - FIRST AID/CPR/AED TRAIN �a FIRST AID/CPR/AED TRAINING FOF Q 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 450.0( Total: 450.0( 219288 3/31/2016 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 16-0841 UNIT 66 - WATER FILL HOSE Unit 66 - Water Fill Hose 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 133.7E Page: 43 Packet Pg. 110 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 219288 3/31/2016 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO (Continued) 219289 3/31/2016 068489 SIRENNET.COM PO # Description/Account 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total 0195835-IN UNIT E105PO - BARRIER WING KIT Unit E105PO - Barrier Wing Kit 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 0196308-IN UNIT 38 - AMBER SURFACE MOUN- Unit 38 - Amber Surface Mount Ions 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0196428-IN UNIT E107PO - HEADLIGHT FLASHI Unit E107PO - Headlight Flasher for I 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 0196430-IN UNIT EQ96PO - HEADLIGHT FLASH Unit eg96po - Headlight Flasher 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 0197556-IN UNIT E107PO - CAB PARTS AND SL Unit E107PO - Cab Parts and Supplie 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 0197857-IN UNIT E109PO - CONSOLE, ARMRE: Unit E109PO - Console, Armrest, Filk 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Freight 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 3.3.b Page: 44 Page: 44 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219289 3/31/2016 068489 068489 SIRENNET.COM 219290 3/31/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 45 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 3,791.01 2003-4823-3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W ui TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W Y U 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 40.1' t 2003-8645-6 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE U CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE E 00 1. 000. 66.518.30.47. 00 49.0( 2 2004-6859-3 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / o LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 414.2 1 o 2004-9314-6 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M Q. MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M Q- a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 14.0E 2005-9295-4 TRAFFIC LIGHT 101 9TH AVE S / ME c TRAFFIC LIGHT 101 9TH AVE S / ME r 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 17.9E to 2006-3860-9 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON M 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 353.9: c 2006-7801-9 TRAFFIC LIGHT 200 3RD AVE S / MI N TRAFFIC LIGHT 200 3RD AVE S / MI U 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.8E E 2007-1403-8 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK V 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 40.5( 2007-4860-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW E TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 15.1 2008-6520-2 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE Q LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 60.4E 2011-9708-4 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 67.1, 2012-3682-5 FISHING PIER Page: 45 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219290 3/31/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 46 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) FISHING PIER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 269.7' Y 2012-6598-0 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � U LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 U 210.8' E 2013-7496-4 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P M LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P 6 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 21.0, o 2015-7289-8 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME o L 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 42.01 a 2015-8215-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W Q TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 23.6. o 2015-9448-8 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S v LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S o 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 19.0� 2016-1195-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W C? TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W M 0 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 27.6, u) 2016-5690-7 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN,' U DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN,' E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 120.8' V 2017-5147-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 55.8, E 2017-8264-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 17.9E Q 2019-0786-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 26.1: 2019-2991-6 WWTP - METER 200 23ND AVE S / F WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 1( 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 15.1 , Page: 46 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219290 3/31/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 219291 219292 219293 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 2020-8787-0 2022-8912-0 2023-8937-5 2024-2158-2 2026-2041-5 2028-0763-2 2030-99778-7 3/31/2016 066072 SNO CO SHERIFF & POLICE CHIEFS SCSPCA 2016 3/31/2016 068618 SNOHOMISH COUNTY PARKS DEPT 03152016 3/31/2016 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 13016/4 3.3.b Page: 47 PO # Description/Account Amoun LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / ME1 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / ME1 N 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 108.1: U TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME U E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 54.9( 'Fa STREET LIGHT 7601 RIDGE WAY / ( U STREET LIGHT 7601 RIDGE WAY / P o 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 8.5E 7v- LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI o LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI L Q. 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 a 144.8, Q MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 15.7: v TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW o TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 17.1' r? WWTP - 200 2ND AVE S / METER 1( M 0 WWTP2002NDAVE S 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 26,845.2E U Total : 29,133.9, . SCSPCA DUES 2016 - EDMONDS P V 2016 SCSPCA DUES - EDMONDS P 001.000.41.521.10.49.00 75.0( E Total: 75.0( c� RECOGNITION PLAQUE FOR CIVIC Q RECOGNITION PLAQUE FOR CIVIC 132.000.64.594.76.61.00 25.0( Total : 25.0( STORM - WORK JEANS (5) J WARD Storm - Work Jeans (5) J Ward Page: 47 Packet Pg. 114 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 219293 3/31/2016 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS (Continued) 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 13282/4 STORM - REPLACEMENT BOOTS F Storm - Replacement Boots for Crew 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 13698/4 STORM - WORK SWEATSHIRT, T'S, Storm - Work Sweatshirt, T's, Jeans 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 13700/4 STREET - WORK BOOTS, HOODY I Street - Work Boots, Hoody R Newkii 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 38275/1 STREET - WORK JEANS (1) HOOD) Street - Work Jeans (1) Hoody (1) B 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 9.2% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 Total: 219294 3/31/2016 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18106853 STREET - 3" SNATCH BLOCKS, MA( Street - 3" Snatch Blocks, Machinery 111.000.68.542.66.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.66.31.00 18108514 STORM - MARKING PAINT, RED DA Storm - Marking Paint, Red Danger T 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 3.3.b Page: 48 Amoun 231.2E N 21.91 L) t U E 214.0( 'Fa U 20.3< o 0 L 356.4E 0- a 33.8( 0 185.8( w 17.6E r? lid 0 84.7E U E 7.8( V 1,173.8E; c a� E t 395.9, Q 37.6' 258.3E 24.5z Page: 48 Packet Pg. 115 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 49 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219294 3/31/2016 040917 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued) Total: 716.4, 219295 3/31/2016 073970 TALLMAN, TYLER 3/18-3/25 FIELD ATT 3/18-3/25/16 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTE ui 3/18-3/25/16 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTE Y U 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 110.0( t Total: 110.0( E 219296 3/31/2016 070744 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC 2016-159036 BUSINESS RECRUITMENT AD IN SI Business recruitment ad in Seattle 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 0 5,000.0( Fa Total: 5,000.0( o 0 219297 3/31/2016 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 52616 MARINA BEACH FENCE REPAIR a MARINA BEACH FENCE REPAIR Q 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 225.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 r 21.3E " Total: 246.31 219298 3/31/2016 042260 TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPLY CO 108549 TRAFFIC - SOLAR SPEED LIMIT BLI C? Traffic - Solar Speed Limit Blinkersigr o 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 3,110.0( Y Mgmt Fees 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 23.0, 9.5% Sales Tax V 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 297.6z 4.; Total: 3,430.6E E 219299 3/31/2016 075563 UE SERVICES LLC 5-15275 #7320 UTILITY REFUND DUE TO EE #7320 Utility refund due to estimated 411.000.233.000 116.5( Q Total: 116.5( 219300 3/31/2016 062949 UNIT PROCESS COMPANY 10033318 WWTP - CONTROL VALVE CONTROL VALVE 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 1,194.0( Freight Page: 49 Packet Pg. 116 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219300 3/31/2016 062949 UNIT PROCESS COMPANY 219301 3/31/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 Tota I : 3355 STREET/ STORM - WORK HATS Street/ Storm - Work Hats 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 Street/ Storm - Work Hats 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 3439 PS - COUNCIL CHAMBERS PROJEC PS - Council Chambers Projector Ligi 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3535 PNWS-AWWA- WORKSHOP - J WA PNWS-AWWA- Workshop - J Waite 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 American Locksets - City Hall - Powei 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 USPS - Recycle Shipping Fees for 421.000.74.537.90.49.00 Tota I : 219302 3/31/2016 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0656154-WA 219303 3/31/2016 064423 USA BLUE BOOK STORM - DOT Storm - DOT 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 874867 SEWER - ROOT-X SUPPLIES Sewer - Root-X Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Total 3.3.b Page: 50 Page: 50 Packet Pg. 117 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 219303 3/31/2016 064423 064423 USA BLUE BOOK (Continued) 219304 3/31/2016 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 6020125 219305 3/31/2016 072841 VS VISUAL STATEMENT INC 219306 3/31/2016 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 219307 3/31/2016 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 219308 3/31/2016 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS SIN002673 201126069 Description/Account Total: UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 Total INV#SIN002673 - EDMONDS PD TRUE PARTNER MAIN 05/06-05/05/' 001.000.41.521.71.35.00 Total INV 201126069 EDMONDS PD - BICI BASIC LE ACADEMY 732 - BICKLEY 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Total 55463 INV#55463 - EDMONDS PD TOW 1999 DODGE #AWG6565 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total 116-081 STREET - TREE REMOVAL 850 EDP Street - Tree Removal 850 Edmonds 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 116-082 STREET - REMOVE 2 MAPLES 162: Street - Remove 2 Maples 16233 721 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 3.3.b Page: 51 Amoun 1,179.11 N U 65.1: t U 65.1 < •E 67.1' o 197.3, 0 0. a 1,259.1( Q 1,259.1( c 0 3,187.0( c 3,187.0( M 0 U 166.0( V 15.7- 181.71 E t �a 15111811111 Page: 51 Packet Pg. 118 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 52 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 219308 3/31/2016 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 38.0( Total: 219309 3/31/2016 075283 WAVE BROADBAND 102-261607 FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF High Speed Internet service 04/01/16 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 Total 219310 3/31/2016 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 14639-SO TRAFFIC - LUMINAIRE, TRENTON F Traffic - Luminaire, Trenton Roadway 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total 219311 3/31/2016 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 15675 FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 219312 3/31/2016 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR TR-286745 STORM - WORK SWEATSHIRT- B C Storm - Work Sweatshirt - B Clemens 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.2% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 Total 219313 3/31/2016 072057 XYLEM DEWATERING SOLUTIONS 400583780 SEWER - PARTS FOR BYPASSPUM Sewer - Parts for ByPassPump 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Page: 52 Packet Pg. 119 vchlist 03/31 /2016 11:37:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 219313 3/31/2016 072057 XYLEM DEWATERING SOLUTIONS 219314 3/31/2016 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 135 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 135 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 3.3.b Page: 53 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 125.0( Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 107.2( Total: 1,236.2E E 0181182 PARKS DEPT - SIGN BLANKS Parks Dept - Sign Blanks p 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 560.6( Fa Freight p 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 L 37.1( a 9.5% Sales Tax Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 56.7E 0181306 TRAFFIC CONTROL - BLANKS 66X1 0 Traffic Control - Blanks 66x12 Alum 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 114.8( Blanks 66x6 Alum 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 103.2( r? Freight c 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 32.8( Y 9.5% Sales Tax U 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 23.8< .E Total : 929.11 V Bank total : 454,796.4E a� Total vouchers : 454,796.4E c� Q Page: 53 Packet Pg. 120 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4J13 STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3JB STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1 CA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 ui U m t U E 2 U 0 0 L a a a 0 r Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 121 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 ElFM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC ui General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB t FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB U E WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA o PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA 0 0 STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD Q. a SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB Q STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB o SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC Z. to STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA `? M 0 STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE L STM NPDES m013 E7FG a� STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN Z_ STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC ° a FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD D, WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA 0 STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB a a� L STR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB u_ STR SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) s014 E6AA r E UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA c� STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG Q STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-1 05th/l 06th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 122 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Protect Funding Protect Title Number Number WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 123 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) 3.3.c Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements TR c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacemen STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III 378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System 380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study IMISTR E3D=c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E31FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive 429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th JOL STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Projec WTR E3J13 c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) WE3LB STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlav Proaram WTR E4CB dc451 2014 Chip Se E4CC c452 2014 Waterline E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept 454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM E41FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements 4FB LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration 4 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SW R Video Assessment of Stormwater Li E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 124 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program ^G^ 2016 Water,,Comp PlarlUpdatP FAC E41-A c444 Public Safety Controls System Upqrades FAC E4MB STR E5AB WTR E5CB STR E5DA General STM E5FA STM STM E5FC STM E5FD City Spray Park c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab MMUTrackside Warning System c471 2015 Traffic Calming c463 2015 Overlay Progra c475 2015 Waterline Overlays i007 RP 2015 Sewerline Overlays - c474 Bikelink Project c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysi c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c472 AM479 STM E5FE c484 SWR 469 SWR E5GB s011 WWTP WTR E5JA c468 TR E5,113 48 WTR E5KA c473 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) Seaview Park Infiltration Facility 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects ' Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir VFAC 6 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates STR Vi008 2016 Overlay PrograrA WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays MMM E6CC iopw 2016 Sewerline Overlays STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements E7FG m01 PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 125 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) 3.3.c Engineering Protect Funding Number PM EBMA Protect Accounting Number c282 Protect Title Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 126 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1 FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STIR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STIR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM EYE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STIR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STIR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STIR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring ui U m t U E 2 U 0 0 L a a a 0 r Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 127 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I ui STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines t WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update U E SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project o STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program > 0 STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects Q. a STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects Q WTR E5JA c468 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects o SWR E5GA c469 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects 0 STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming `? M 0 STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) L WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating a� STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project 3 Z WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays a FAC E5LA c476 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers rn General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis D, STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility 0 WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications a a� L WTR E5J13 c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) u_ r STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements E STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c� STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements Q SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E7FG m013 NPDES UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates SWR E5GB sol l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 128 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) 3.3.c Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number STIR E6AA s014 Protect Title SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 129 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E41-A General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES m013 E7FG STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA ui U m t U E 2 U 0 0 Q. a a 0 Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 130 3.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STIR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA ui STIR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB U m STIR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE t U E STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STIR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA o STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB 0 Q. STIRSR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB Q STIR SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) s014 E6AA c STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA v STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STIR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA M M STIR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA L SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC E Z SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA p^ L SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC m SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l E5GB a SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC LL UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA E t WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC c� WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB Q WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3JB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5JB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E51KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 3/30/2016 Packet Pg. 131 3.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 February 2016 Monthly Budgetary Financial Report Staff Lead/Author: Sarah Mager Department: Administrative Services Initiated By: No action needed; informational only. Attachments: February 2016 Monthly Financial Report Packet Pg. 132 I 3.4.a I OF EDP � d l)7C 1SOV CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2016 Packet Pg. 133 1 3.4.a Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F EDMO NDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 39,266,670 $ 4,032,511 $ 4,307,339 $ 34,959,331 110 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 278,770 383 466 278,304 00 011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 6,660 754 878 5,782 130 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 28,110 4,000 1,520 26,590 50 013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND - 41 52 (52) 00 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,000 1 8 4,992 00 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,005,000 45,007 25,808 1,979,192 10 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 153,000 11,095 68,479 84,521 45' 111 STREET FUND 1,760,500 219,678 221,618 1,538,882 13° Q 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE t 8,026,497 396,369 3,037,343 4,989,154 380 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 102,410 324 483 101,927 09 s 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 110 13 16 94 r� 150, C O 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 82,150 11,067 11,556 70,594 140 2 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 21,390 6,201 6,813 14,577 320 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 5,550 131 17 5,533 00 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 27,530 3,713 3,895 23,635 140 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2 1,108,000 142,925 225,817 882,183 200 Q. 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND Z 1,102,000 142,667 225,693 876,307 d 20° 127 GIFTSCATALOGFUND 46,900 24,395 18,297 28,603 390 t) 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 280 28 35 245 130 cCp C 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 177,260 41,664 23,939 153,321 140 j,i 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 3 2,537,240 17,759 135,230 2,402,010 50, s 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 630 Ill 139 491 r 220 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 19,880 5,254 3,454 16,426 17° 2 m 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 12,010 1 4 12,006 00, G 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 682,500 106,009 106,346 576,154 160 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 32,051 34,320 (34,320) 09 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 14,400 9,718 773 13,627 L 50, 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 14,400 - - 14,400 00 LL. 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 677,380 - - 677,380 09 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 949,540 - 936,429 13,111 99° s 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 45,348 25,583 (25,583) 00 M 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 4 8,443,460 1,087,330 1,348,442 7,095,018 160 Q 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 4,131,780 934,797 845,820 3,285,960 200 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 5 12,645,240 1,336,070 1,785,770 10,859,470 140, 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,989,900 1 1 1,989,899 00 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,579,570 270,869 261,333 1,318,237 170 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 64,840 136 184 64,656 00, $ 87,966,557 $ 8,928,418 $ 13,663,900 $ 74,302,657 160, Difference between 2015 and 2016 is due to grant invoicing for various projects in 2016. 2 Real Estate Excise Tax revenues for both funds 125 and 126 is up a total of $119,263 from 2015. 3 Difference between 2015 and 2016 is largely due to a substantial park impact fee in 2016. 4 Difference between 2015 and 2016 islargely due to a substantial water connection fee and the 9%increase to water base rates s Difference between 2015 and 2016 is largely due to timing difference for invoicing in 2016 and 9.5%increase to sewer base rates 1 Packet Pg. 134 3.4.a Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F IDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERAL FUND 6 $ 40,691,280 $ 6,730,834 $ 7,893,221 $ 32,798,059 190/( 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 279,480 58,126 42,801 236,679 1501( 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND - - - - 00/( 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 800,000 - 800,000 00/( 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,400 - - 5,400 00/( 016 BUILDING MAINT ENANCE 2,175,000 8,823 7,149 2,167,851 00/( 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 76,030 544 16,472 59,558 220/( III STREET FUND 1,712,370 293,436 322,714 1,389,656 19% .-. 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 8,039,592 54,338 715,255 7,324,337 90/( 0 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 181,380 2,219 3,693 177,687 2% 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - - - - 0% >' t 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 149,650 1,082 6,121 143,529 40/( O 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 - - 26,880 0% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 249 189 2,811 6°/ �p 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 31,500 1,715 3,737 27,763 120/, 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2,008,632 39,483 13,975 1,994,657 10/( 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 8 2,480,320 - 475,000 2,005,320 190/( 0 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 44,950 964 6,553 38,397 d 1501( 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND - - - - 00/( .� c� 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 210,370 26,912 22,719 187,651 110/( 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND s 2,760,770 7,294 496,143 2,264,627 180/( ji 136 PARKSTRUST FUND - - - - 0% s 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 12,500 - - 12,500 r 00/( C 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 682,500 106,009 106,346 576,154 160/, 2 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 1,175 893 (893) m 00% G 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 14,400 - - 14,400 00/( 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND - - - 00/( L 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 677,380 54 - 677,380 0% 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 6 949,540 - 936,429 13,111 O 990/( LL 421 WATER UTILITYFUND 12,713,757 962,551 986,969 11,726,788 8°/ 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 7,609,700 388,964 433,597 7,176,103 6% s 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 17,741,300 1,282,255 1,215,189 16,526,111 70/( 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,990,920 54 - 1,990,920 00/( Q 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,955,820 123,760 102,543 1,853,277 501( 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 59,610 11,814 8,359 51,251 140/( $ 106,084,031 $10,102,655 $ 13,816,066 $ 92,267,965 130% 6 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are primarily due to final payment of 2014 debt. 7 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are due to invoices for construction projects in 2016. 8 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are due to purchase of Civic Field in 2016. 2 Packet Pg. 135 1 3.4.a Page 1 of 3 C TIY O F EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received TAXES: REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX EMS PROPERT Y T AX VOTED PROPERTY TAX LOCAL RETAIL SALESUSE TAX 9 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX GAS UTILITY TAX SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX WATER UTILITY TAX SEWER UT ILIT Y T AX ST ORMWAT ER UT ILIT Y TAX T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX PULLTABSTAX AMUSEMENT GAMES LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LICENSES AND PERMITS: FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE POLICE - FINGERPRINTING PROF AND OCC LICENSE -TAXI AMUSEMENTS FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -VERIZON/FRONT IER FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -BLACKROCK FRANCHISE AGREMENT-ZAYO OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 10 ANIMAL LICENSES STREET AND CURB PERMIT OT R NON -BUS LIC/P ERMIT S INTERGOVERNMENTAL: FEDERAL GRANT S-BUDGET ONLY DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST USDA FOREST SERVICE ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE GRANT ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE II TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE WA STATE ADMIN OFFICE COURTS GRANT 2014 COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT WATERFRONT ANALYSIS GRANT PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION -STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS DUI - CITIES LIQUOR EXCISE TAX LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS MISCELLANEOUS INTERLOCAL REVENUE INTERLOCAL GRANTS VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS $ 10,068,020 $ 85,313 $ 53,564 $ 10,014,456 1% 3,688,090 27,733 18,656 3,669,434 1% 949,540 8,067 4,993 944,547 1% 6,144,400 1,134,685 1,204,754 4,939,646 20% 9,800 1,616 1,358 8,442 14% 626,700 112,853 119,672 507,028 19% 1,451,800 327,208 348,280 1,103,520 24% 647,900 181,842 176,574 471,326 27% 306,500 51,751 54,473 252,027 18% 1,229,110 163,541 176,373 1,052,737 14% 629,140 94,028 103,469 525,671 16% 330,430 71,526 75,076 255,354 23% 846,000 140,331 143,716 702,284 17%^+ 1,349,100 240,490 230,098 1,119,002 17% o 60,600 11,837 12,510 48,090 21% d 40 - 141 (101) 351% 242,200 58,414 59,768 182,432 25% >+ 28,579,370 2,711,235 2,783,475 25,795,895 10°/a C 250 105 120 130 48% 2 300 - 20 280 7% •- 630 - - 630 0% c0 4,740 1,500 - 4,740 0% o 710,600 178,240 180,648 529,952 25% 44,900 7,958 7,081 37,819 16% 100,900 24,811 25,106 75,794 25% 0 18,400 5,227 4,107 14,293 22% d - - - - 0% 268,000 57,968 60,666 207,334 23% cC 116,000 72,629 59,510 56,490 51% 42,000 6,940 8,840 33,160 21% to 70,400 16,900 30,550 39,850 43% 15,000 5,388 - 15,000 0% U+ 525,000 63,327 128,748 396,252 25% s 38,800 8,769 5,289 33,511 14% C 42,100 2,209 9,875 32,225 23% o 2 13,100 2,020 2,775 10,325 21% 2,011,120 453,991 523,336 1,487,784 26% 0 N - - - - 0% 11,970 - - 11,970 0% _ _ _ _ 0% L - - - 0% 6,000 - - 6,000 0% LL 7,500 468 - 7,500 0% ++ 3,000 - 1,139 1,861 38% N - - - - 0% E 300 300 - 300 0% v - - 0% M - - 89,893 (89,893) 0% Q 192,500 - - 192,500 0% 10,000 2,608 2,725 7,275 27% 13,000 4,074 4,575 8,425 35% 36,980 9,581 9,961 27,019 27% 7,240 1,756 1,593 5,647 22% 65,200 19,873 42,903 22,297 66% 357,800 - - 357,800 0% - - - - 0% 383,330 - - 383,330 0% - - - 0% 1,094,820 38,660 152,789 942,031 14% 9 2016 Local Retail Sales/Use Taxrevenues are $70,070 higher than 2015 revenues. Please also see pages 18 & 19. 10 2016 Building Structure Permit revenues are $65,421 higher than 2015 revenues. 3 Packet Pg. 136 3.4.a Page 2 of 3 C ITY O F EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS ATM SURCHARGE FEES COURT RECORD SERVICES D/M COURT REC SER SHARED COURT COSTS MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURREXPEN SALE MAPS & BOOKS CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMIT S BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT PHOTOCOPIES POLICE DISCLOSURE REOUESTS ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES SNO-ISLE PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS OCDETF OVERTIME CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES FIRE PROTECTION & EMS FORDUI FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE BOOKING FEES FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE CRIM CONV FEE CT CRIM CONV FEE CN FIBER SERVICES INTERGOVERNMENTAL FIBER SERVICES FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE PLAN CHECKING FEES FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES PLANNING 1%INSPECTION FEE S.E.P.A. REVIEW CRITICAL AREA STUDY DV COORDINATOR SERVICES SWIM POOL ENTRANCE FEES GYM AND WEIGHT ROOM FEES LOCKER FEES SWIM CLASS FEES PROGRAM FEES TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES SWIM TEAM/DIVE TEAM WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES BIRD FESI' REGISTRATION FEES INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS 2,000 162 86 1,914 4% 250 - 13 237 5% - - 0% 50 7 3 47 7% - - - 0% 400 79 163 237 41% 100 - 100 0% 25,100 25,100 0% 600 - - 600 0% 2,000 349 196 1,804 10% 4,000 934 625 3,375 16% 180,350 14,434 35,417 144,933 20% - - - - 0% 58,000 14,361 16,084 41,916 28% 15,000 4,710 4,225 10,775 28% 26,000 - - 26,000 0% - - - 0% 12,300 605 - 12,300 0% 39,500 10,650 10,180 29,320 26% 1,500 - - 1,500 0% 300 105 - 300 0% - - 10 (10) 0% 45,000 12,095 13,635 31,365 30% 60,000 11,118 12,432 47,568 21% 6,000 1,085 731 5,269 12% 8,000 3,657 4,356 3,644 54% 15,000 1,205 1,621 13,379 11% 822,100 197,671 231,033 591,067 28% - - - - 0% - - - - 0% 9,200 1,530 1,530 7,670 17% 7,200 1,200 1,200 6,000 17% 1,800 - 310 1,490 17% 6,000 674 35 5,965 1% 75,000 14,334 12,190 62,810 16% 425,000 131,353 53,627 371,373 13% 3,000 2,115 1,710 1,290 57% 1,250 - 1,228 22 98% 7,000 610 - 7,000 0% 15,000 2,170 1,705 13,295 11% 10,000 1,582 1,853 8,147 19% - - - - 0% 7,800 1,573 2,368 5,432 30% - - - - 0% - - - - 0% 861,700 112,396 134,016 727,684 16% 19,130 15,866 465 18,665 2% - - - - 0% - 25 (25) 0% 950 - - 950 0% 2,964,600 138,529 157,556 2,807,044 5% 5,738,180 6979160 700,628 5,0379552 12% 4 Packet Pg. 137 3.4.a Page 3 of 3 CITY OFEDMONDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received FINES AND FORFEITURES: PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 8,000 880 769 7,231 10% TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 25,000 3,920 29,638 (4,638) 119% NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 260,000 40,992 9,886 250,114 4% CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 24,600 3,033 3,138 21,462 13% SPEEDINGDOUBLE - - - - 0% NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 1,300 - 19,125 (17,825) 1471% OTHERINFRACTIONS'04 1,000 156 206 794 21% PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 43,000 5,995 5,805 37,195 14% PR -HANDICAPPED - - - - 0% PARK/INDDISZONE 1,300 570 617 683 47% DWI PENALTIES 6,000 1,120 1,682 4,318 28% DUI - DP ACCT 2,500 225 547 1,953 22% CRIM CNV FEE DUI 300 69 117 183 39% OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN - - - - 0% CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 33,000 4,459 5,307 27,694 16% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 1,900 291 316 1,584 17% CRIM CONV FEE CT 2,300 385 379 1,921 16% OTHERNON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 130 87 - 130 0% OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 9,000 2,785 591 8,409 7% COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 900 297 (4) 904 0% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 1,900 333 212 1,688 11% CRIM CONV FEE CN 900 90 131 769 15% CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 60,000 9,699 5,082 54,918 8% PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 33,000 4,567 4,185 28,815 13% COURT INTERPRETER COSTS 100 58 35 65 35% BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 5,000 6,550 3,650 1,350 73% MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 522,130 86,559 91,413 430,717 18% MISCELLANEOUS: INVESTMENT INTEREST 38,600 2,264 4,419 34,181 11% INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 5,700 310 387 5,313 7% INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 5,000 1,510 1,075 3,925 22% PARKING 14,000 2,257 2,482 11,518 18% SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS 128,000 6,173 7,954 120,046 6% BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 5,000 1,040 480 4,520 10% LEASESLONG-TERM 218,100 28,252 30,359 187,741 14% VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 50,000 608 542 49,458 1% OTHER RENTS& USE CHARGES 4,500 900 - 4,500 0% PARKS DONATIONS 9,500 1,000 3,500 6,000 37% BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 950 - - 950 0% 125TH ANNIVERSARY CONTRIBUTIONS - - - 0% VOLUNT EER P ICNIC CONT RIBUT IONS - - - 0% POLICE CONT RIBUT IONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 1,000 - 1,000 0% PARKS GRANTS -PRIVATE SOURCES - - - 0% SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 150 - 150 0% SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 2,000 1,865 135 93% CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 2,000 - 2,000 0% OT HER JUDGEMENT /SET T LEMENT 2,000 18 50 1,950 3% POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 200 - 200 0% CASHIERS OVERAGES/SHORT AGES - - 158 (158) 0% OTHER MISC REVENUES 1,000 531 858 142 86% SMALL OVERPAYMENT 50 1 1 49 3% NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 120 - - 120 0% NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 330 45 66 264 20% FLEX -PLAN SERVICES FORFEITURES 1,010 - 1,010 0% US BANK REBATE 6,000 - 1,500 4,500 25% 495,210 44,907 55,699 439,512 11% TRANSFERS -IN: PROCEEDS OF REFUNDING DEBT - - - - 0% TRANSFER FROM FUND 012 800,000 - 800,000 0% TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 25,840 - 25,840 0% 825,840 - - 825,840 0% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 39,266,670 $ 4,032,511 $ 4,307,339 $ 34,959,331 11% O N 21 t r C O 2 co CD O 5 Packet Pg. 138 I 3.4.a I Page 1 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 13,999,790 $ 2,126,906 $ 2,231,289 $ 11,768,501 16% OVERTIME 423,510 77,782 82,483 341,027 19% HOLIDAY BUY BACK 217,790 - - 217,790 0% BENEFITS 5,352,060 787,445 841,226 4,510,834 16% UNIFORMS 89,290 13,697 12,018 77,272 13% SUPPLIES 393,950 39,946 39,697 354,253 10% SMALL EQUIPMENT 155,480 39,151 23,883 131,597 15% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,394,030 231,450 283,386 3,110,644 8% COMMUNICATIONS 211,890 21,611 20,185 191,705 10% TRAVEL 46,210 1,154 1,871 44,339 4% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 - 373 6,127 6% ADVERTISING - 377 - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 916,390 149,158 151,627 764,763 17% INSURANCE 534,440 418,367 536,735 (2,295) 100% UTILITIES 457,800 65,209 65,420 392,380 14% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 425,530 161,037 59,792 365,738 14% MISCELLANEOUS 383,840 101,956 123,705 260,135 32% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 10,384,010 2,480,779 2,483,104 7,900,906 24% INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 135,000 - - 135,000 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2,909,320 - 936,429 1,972,891 32% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 40,000 14,777 - 40,000 0% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 168,300 - 168,300 0% CAPITAL LEASES AND INSTALLMENT PURCHASES - - - 0% OTHER DEBT - 33 - 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 46,150 - 46,150 0% DEBT ISSUE COSTS - - - 0% INTERFUND SERVICES - - - - 0% 40,691,280 6,730,834 7,893,221 32,798,059 19% LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009) BENEFITS IN HOME LTC CLAIMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (011) MISCELLANEOUS CONTINGENCY RESERVEFUND (012) INTERFUND LOAN INTERFUND SUBSIDIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIRS & MAINTENANENCE MISCELLANEOUS MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT DRUG INFO RCEM NTFUND (104) FUEL CONSUMED SMALL EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES $ 178,720 $ 41,479 $ 42,801 $ 135,919 24% 100,480 16,647 - 100,480 0% - - - 0% 280 - - 280 0% 279,480 58,126 $ 42,801 236,679 15% 0% $ - $ $ $ - 0% 800,000 $ 800,000 0% 800,000 800,000 0% $ 100 $ $ $ 100 0% 200 200 0% 5,100 - 5,100 0% 5,400 5,400 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% 80,000 8,823 6,603 73,397 8% 2,062,000 - - 2,062,000 0% - - 546 (546) 0% 33,000 - - 33,000 0% 2,175,000 8,823 7,149 2,167,851 0% $ 3,000 $ 166 $ 145 $ 2,855 5% 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 2,230 378 292 1,938 13% 800 - - 800 0% 20,000 - 5,000 15,000 25% 45,000 11,035 33,965 25% 76,030 S 544 16,472 S 59,558 22% 6 Packet Pg. 139 I 3.4.a I Page 2 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent STREEI'FUND (111) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 515,160 $ 83,675 $ 84,867 $ 430,293 16% OVERTIME 18,400 2,006 4,332 14,068 24% BENEFITS 265,870 39,958 46,070 219,800 17% UNIFORMS 6,000 3,092 2,754 3,246 46% SUPPLIES 240,000 6,011 25,793 214,208 11% SMALL EQUIPMENT 26,000 - 489 25,511 2% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,050 4,172 3,547 10,503 25% COMMUNICATIONS 3,500 408 629 2,871 18% TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 190,950 31,575 31,484 159,466 16% INSURANCE 87,620 81,386 97,912 (10,292) 112% UTILITIES 270,170 39,080 24,084 246,086 9% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 45,000 2,070 - 45,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 20,500 - - 20,500 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 3,000 - 754 2,246 25% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES - - - - 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - 0% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,420 - 3,420 0% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERIVCE COSTS - - - 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 1,730 - 1,730 0% COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE(112) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES LAND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES MUNIC IPAL ARTS AC Q UIS. FUND (1 l 7) SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENT AL/LEASE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING MISCELLANEOUS INTERFUND SUBSIDIES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) MISCELLANEOUS TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING MISCELLANEOUS $ 1,712,370 $ 293,436 $ 322,714 $ 1,389,656 19% $ 1,614,390 $ 11,145 $ 41,030 $ 1,573,360 3% 358,240 - - 358,240 0% 438,000 - 985 437,015 0% 5,553,332 43,193 673,239 4,880,093 12% 72,220 - - 72,220 0% 3,410 3,410 0% - - - - 0% $ 8,039,592 $ 54,338 $ 715,255 $ 7,324,337 9% $ 4,400 $ $ $ 4,400 0% 1,500 1,500 0% 166,500 1,500 2,678 163,822 2% 80 - 11 70 13% - - - - 0% 2,000 - 2,000 0% 300 - - 300 0% 6,600 719 1,005 5,595 15% $ 181,380 $ 2,219 $ 3,693 $ 177,687 2% $ 77,500 $ 1,000 $ 6,121 $ 71,379 8% - - - - 0% 8,150 82 8,150 0% 4,000 - 4,000 0% 60,000 - - 60,000 0% $ 149,650 $ 1,082 $ 6,121 $ 143,529 4% $ 1,790 $ - $ $ 1,790 0% 25,090 - 25,090 0% $ 26,880 $ - $ $ 26,880 0% $ 3,000 $ 249 $ 189 $ 2,811 6% $ 3,000 $ 249 $ 189 $ 2,811 6% $ 28,300 $ 1,715 $ 3,737 $ 24,563 13% - - - - 0% 3,200 - - 3,200 0% $ 31,500 $ 1,715 $ 3,737 $ 27,763 12% R �r 7 Packet Pg. 140 3.4.a Page 3 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL ES TATE EXC IS E TAX 2 (125) SUPPLIES $ 21,000 $ 18,328 $ 5,118 $ 15,882 24% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 186,788 18,959 7,891 178,897 4% RENTAL/LEASE - 2,196 966 (966) 0% UTILITIES - - - - 0% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 140,000 - 140,000 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,660,844 - - 1,660,844 0% $ 2,008,632 $ 39,483 $ 13,975 $ 1,994,657 1% REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS AC Q (126) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 212,050 $ - $ - $ 212,050 0% MISCELLANEOUS - - - 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 139,430 - - 139,430 0% LAND 692,180 - 475,000 217,180 69% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,406,700 - - 1,406,700 0% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 19,890 19,890 0% Q OTHER DEBT & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - - 0% d INTEREST 10,070 - 10,070 0% $ 2,480,320 $ - $ 475,000 $ 2,005,320 195/0 GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) SUPPLIES $ 13,110 $ 691 $ 253 $ 12,857 2% p PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,000 273 6,300 (300) 105% 2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 25,840 - - 25,840 0% .. $ 44,950 $ 964 $ 6,553 $ 38,397 15% M SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND (129) CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% t' CEMETERY MAINTENANCEIIIVIPRO VEMENT (130) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENT AL/LEASE UTILITIES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (132) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERFUND SUBSIDIES SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) SUPPLIES TRAVEL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT (139) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSURANCE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES $ 108,410 $ 13,749 $ 12,334 $ 96,076 11% 3,500 100 26 3,474 1% 44,500 5,557 5,530 38,970 12% 1,000 197 - 1,000 0% 7,000 134 - 7,000 0% 20,000 3,641 2,338 17,662 12% 4,200 127 145 4,055 3% 1,410 360 166 1,244 12% 500 - - 500 0% - - - - 0% 11,550 1,664 1,925 9,625 17% 3,800 - - 3,800 0% 500 - - 500 0% 4,000 1,384 254 3,746 6% $ 210,370 S 26,912 $ 22,719 $ 187,651 11% $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% 225,000 7,294 6,054 218,946 3% 500,000 - 475,685 24,316 95% 2,035,770 14,405 2,021,365 1% - - - - 0% $ 2,760,770 $ 7,294 $ 496,143 $ 2,264,627 18% $ 2,000 $ - $ $ 2,000 0% 4,500 4,500 0% 6,000 6,000 0% $ 12,500 $ - $ $ 12,500 0% $ - $ - $ $ - 0% 2,500 2,500 2,500 - 100% 680,000 103,509 103,846 576,154 15% $ 682,500 $ 106,009 $ 106,346 $ 576,154 16% Packet Pg. 141 I 3.4.a I Page 4 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent BUSINESS EMPROVFNMI ;T DISTRICT FUND (140) SUPPLIES $ $ 1,175 $ - $ - 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 893 (893) 0% MISCELLANEOUS - - - - 0% - 1,175 893 893 0% LID FUND CONTROL (211) INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND INTEREST OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 2014 DEBTSERVICEFUND (232) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND INTEREST WATER FUND (421) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL EXCISE TAXES RENT AL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST DEBT ISSUE COSTS OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES $ 14,400 $ - $ $ 14,400 0% $ 14,400 $ - $ $ 14,400 0% $ 536,270 $ - $ $ 536,270 0% 140,610 - 140,610 0% 500 54 500 0% $ 677,380 S 54 $ $ 677,380 0% r- $ 933,210 $ - $ 933,208 $ 2 100% 16,330 - 3,221 13,109 20% $ 949,540 $ - $ 936,429 $ 13,111 99% $ 795,220 $ 123,338 $ 128,103 $ 667,118 16% 24,000 3,871 4,760 19,240 20% 372,550 55,260 59,102 313,448 16% 4,000 372 247 3,753 6% 151,000 3,062 2,682 148,318 2% 1,600,000 194,504 217,778 1,382,222 14% 143,000 4,322 8,964 134,036 6% 11,000 - - 11,000 0% 1,793,286 67,998 93,186 1,700,100 5% 30,000 5,369 3,150 26,850 11% 200 - - 200 0% 340,000 51,391 65,288 274,712 19% 100,750 16,232 16,565 84,185 16% 58,920 70,904 52,335 6,585 89% 40,000 4,012 4,088 35,912 10% 17,000 8,214 520 16,480 3% 66,700 17,854 18,601 48,099 28% 30,000 5,391 5,555 24,445 19% 1,229,110 163,541 176,373 1,052,737 14% 731,220 - - 731,220 0% 15,000 - - 15,000 0% 4,551,921 166,886 129,673 4,422,248 3% 2,300 - - 2,300 0% 323,870 - 323,870 0% 25,840 - 25,840 0% 256,870 - 256,870 0% - - - 0% - 31 - 0% - - - - 0% $ 12,713,757 $ 962,551 $ 986,969 $ 11,726,788 8% 9 Packet Pg. 142 I 3.4.a I Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent S TO RM FUND (422) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 640,470 $ 83,157 $ 90,737 $ 549,733 14% OVERTIME 6,000 3,190 827 5,173 14% BENEFITS 313,950 40,447 42,943 271,007 14% UNIFORMS 6,500 3,073 2,690 3,810 41% SUPPLIES 46,500 8,966 1,425 45,075 3% SMALL EQUIPMENT 4,000 787 - 4,000 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,638,530 55,660 60,775 2,577,755 2% COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 359 449 2,751 14% TRAVEL 4,300 - 200 4,100 5% EXCISE TAXES 55,000 6,892 7,324 47,676 13% RENTAL/LEASE 252,990 35,722 41,624 211,366 16% INSURANCE 64,120 39,269 63,187 933 99% UTILITES 10,500 1,407 1,475 9,025 14% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 13,000 7,846 - 13,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 91,200 9,325 6,679 84,521 7% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 85,000 21,322 38,185 46,815 45% INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 330,430 71,526 75,076 255,354 23% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 410,080 - - 410,080 0% LAND 25,000 - 25,000 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,168,330 - 2,168,330 0% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 83,800 - 83,800 0% REVENUE BONDS 158,300 - 158,300 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 32,070 - 32,070 0% INTEREST 166,430 166,430 0% DEBT ISSUE COSTS - - 0% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 15 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES - - - - 0% $ 7,609,700 $ 388,964 $ 433,597 $ 7,176,103 6% SEWER FUND (423) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES FUEL CONSUMED SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL EXCISE TAXES RENT AL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT INTERFUND SUBSIDIES MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST DEBT ISSUE COSTS OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES BOND RESERVEFUND (424) REVENUE BONDS DEBT ISSUE COSTS INTEREST OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS $ 1,721,530 $ 274,194 $ 289,516 $ 1,432,014 17% 100,000 13,687 15,302 84,698 15% 771,920 118,388 130,034 641,886 17% 9,500 1,767 2,481 7,019 26% 420,200 37,467 32,321 387,879 8% 90,000 11,762 5,524 84,476 6% 4,000 - - 4,000 0% 46,000 1,564 7,058 38,942 15% 1,934,696 160,355 150,052 1,784,644 8% 43,000 5,513 5,273 37,727 12% 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 150,000 29,055 40,900 109,100 27% 182,670 32,896 29,640 153,030 16% 96,630 139,648 105,637 (9,007) 109% 1,056,660 124,826 124,236 932,424 12% 325,000 38,717 46,590 278,410 14% 101,700 11,612 8,526 93,174 8% 150,000 61,815 64,448 85,552 43% 629,140 94,028 103,469 525,671 16% 2,563,949 - - 2,563,949 0% - - - - 0% 6,843,825 124,952 54,182 6,789,643 1% 130,140 - - 130,140 0% 72,840 - 72,840 0% 170,620 - 170,620 0% 122,280 - 122,280 0% - - - 0% - 7 - 0% - - - - 0% $ 17,741,300 $ 1,282,255 $ 1,215,189 $ 16,526,111 7% $ 655,010 $ - $ $ 655,010 0% - - - 0% 1,334,910 - 1,334,910 0% 1,000 54 1,000 0% $ 1,990,920 $ 54 $ $ 1,990,920 0% 10 Packet Pg. 143 I 3.4.a I Page 6 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 224,880 $ 34,837 $ 37,713 $ 187,167 17% OVERTIME 2,000 61 - 2,000 0% BENEFITS 105,050 15,766 16,123 88,927 15% UNIFORMS 1,000 52 57 943 6% SUPPLIES 110,000 9,416 1,598 108,402 1% FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 0% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 308,200 3,798 3,980 304,220 1% SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 12,344 392 57,608 1% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44,000 60 327 43,673 1% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 298 398 2,602 13% TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 19,440 2,402 3,056 16,384 16% INSURANCE 29,560 40,605 28,335 1,225 96% UTILITIES 14,000 1,885 1,905 12,095 14% REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 60,000 2,143 2,689 57,311 4% MISCELLANEOUS 7,190 - 140 7,050 2% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 - 2,500 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 965,000 93 5,830 959,170 1% INTERFUND RENTAL - - - 0% $ 1,955,820 $ 123,760 $ 102,543 $ 1,853,277 5% FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617) BENEFITS $ 30,940 $ 7,279 $ 4,058 $ 26,882 13% PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 27,470 4,535 4,302 23,168 16% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200 - - 1,200 0% $ 59,610 $ 11,814 $ 8,359 $ 51,251 14% TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS $ 106,084,031 $ 10,102,655 $ 13,816,066 $ 92,267,965 13% 11 Packet Pg. 144 3.4.a Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL $ 295,500 $ 32,177 $ 27,668 $ 267,832 9% OFFICE OF MAYOR 260,250 41,879 43,294 216,956 170/c HUMAN RESOURCES 445,790 58,245 58,708 387,082 130/c MUNICIPAL COURT 909,270 131,534 145,300 763,970 160/c CITY CLERK 585,310 113,771 87,838 497,472 150/c ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,839,930 382,972 288,956 1,550,974 160/c CITY ATTORNEY 741,560 109,902 120,220 621,340 160/c O NON -DEPARTMENTAL 14,939,500 2,984,442 4,065,136 10,874,364 270/c POLICE SERVICES 9,628,550 1,439,842 1,527,193 8,101,357 160/c COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV. 483,580 55,912 61,145 422,435 130/c DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2,473,970 336,679 361,353 2,112,617 150/c PARKS& RECREATION 3,762,150 470,482 502,972 3,259,178 130/c �p PUBLIC WORKS 2,842,120 348,206 362,844 2,479,276 130/ o FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,483,800 224,792 240,595 1,243,205 160/c $ 40,691,280 $ 6,730,834 $ 7,893,221 $ 32,798,059 190/c C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY Title 2016 Adopted Budget 2/28/2015 Expenditures 2/29/2016 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent WATER UTILITY FUND $ 12,713,757 $ 962,551 $ 986,969 $ 11,726,788 80/ STORM UTILITY FUND 7,609,700 388,964 433,597 7,176,103 60/ SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 17,741,300 1,282,255 1,215,189 16,526,111 70/ BOND RESERVE FUND 1,990,920 54 - 1,990,920 0% $ 40,055,677 $ 2,633,824 $ 2,635,755 $ 37,419,922 7% 12 Packet Pg. 145 Title C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Budget Expenditures Expenditures Amount Remaining Page 1 of 4 %Spent C ITY C O UNC IL SALARIES $ 119,100 $ 20,050 $ 15,172 $ 103,928 13% OVERTIME 1,000 - - 1,000 0% BENEFITS 88,550 10,747 11,583 76,967 13% SUPPLIES 2,000 92 105 1,895 5% SMALL EQUIPMENT - - - - 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 47,160 - - 47,160 0% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,132 600 2,400 20% TRAVEL 6,700 70 140 6,560 2% RENTAL/LEASE 490 85 69 421 14% REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 27,000 - - 27,000 0% $ 295,500 $ 32,177 $ 27,668 $ 267,832 9%' OFFICEOFMAYOR 0 sZ SALARIES $ 197,160 $ 32,646 $ 32,914 $ 164,246 17% BENEFITS 48,190 7,717 8,009 40,181 17% SUPPLIES 1,500 169 81 1,419 5% SMALL EQUIPMENT - - - - 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000 764 848 1,152 42% 0 COMMUNICATION 1,400 40 191 1,209 14% TRAVEL 3,000 - 514 2,486 17% �p RENTAL/LEASE 2,400 335 322 2,078 13% p REPAIR/MAINTENANCE - - - - 0% MISCELLANEOUS 4,600 209 415 4,185 9%+ $ 260,250 $ 41,879 $ 43,294 $ 216,956 17% 0 HUMAN RESOURCES d SALARIES $ 226,880 $ 34,601 $ 37,219 $ 189,661 16% BENEFITS 73,380 11,323 12,464 60,916 17% SUPPLIES 2,300 260 1,196 1,104 52% SMALL EQUIPMENT 300 - - 300 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114,000 3,387 6,497 107,503 6% COMMUNICATIONS 700 95 191 509 27% >, TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% t ADVERTISING - - - - 0% C RENTAL/LEASE 2,200 335 322 1,878 15% 0 REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 7,850 7,793 - 7,850 0% MISCELLANEOUS 17,180 451 819 16361 50 $ 445,790 $ 58,245 $ 58,708 $ 387,082 13% N MUNIC H'AL C O URT �+ SALARIES $ 566,190 $ 84,274 $ 93,260 $ 472,930 16% OVERTIME 600 34 - 600 0% BENEFITS 222,750 28,642 34,486 188,264 15% SUPPLIES 9,930 971 1,183 8,747 12% Li , SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,800 1,104 132 2,668 5% C PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 64,000 11,638 12,430 51,570 19% N t COMMUNICATIONS 1,800 262 478 1,322 27% TRAVEL 2,500 901 119 2,381 5% RENTAL/LEASE 800 - 130 670 16% Q REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,700 117 128 1,572 8% MISCELLANEOUS 36,200 3,592 2,954 33,246 8% $ 909,270 $ 131,534 $ 145,300 $ 763,970 16% 13 Packet Pg. 146 I 3.4.a I Page 2 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY CLERK SALARIES AND WAGES $ 324,480 $ 71,563 $ 57,785 $ 266,695 18% OVERTIME - 141 164 (164) 0% BENEFITS 129,300 20,989 21,777 107,523 17% SUPPLIES 10,240 1,771 550 9,690 5% SMALL EQUIPMENT - - 500 (500) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,310 2,661 1,881 26,429 7% COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 8,056 112 49,888 0% TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% ADVERTISING - - - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 20,000 2,281 3,057 16,943 15% REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 17,980 5,624 1,350 16,630 8% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 685 662 3,338 17% $ 585,310 $ 113,771 $ 87,838 $ 497,472 15% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SALARIES $ 892,390 $ 128,399 $ 136,994 $ 755,396 15% OVERTIME 6,670 235 23 6,647 0% BENEFITS 305,800 44,431 46,941 258,859 15% SUPPLIES 43,050 1,561 653 42,397 2% SMALL EQUIPMENT 110,650 33,726 15,237 95,413 14% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111,400 13,096 2,913 108,487 3% COMMUNICATIONS 61,500 5,267 8,510 52,990 14% TRAVEL 2,900 - - 2,900 0% RENT AL/LEASE 8,200 1,499 1,531 6,669 19% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 242,680 119,785 32,186 210,494 13% MISCELLANEOUS 14,690 20,196 43,966 (29,276) 299% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 40,000 14,777 - 40,000 0% $ 1,839,930 $ 382,972 $ 288,956 $ 1,550,974 16% CITY ATTORNEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 741,560 $ 109,902 $ 120,220 $ 621,340 16% MISCELLANEOUS 0% $ 741,560 $ 109, 002 $ 120,220 $ 621,340 16% NON -DEPARTMENTAL SALARIES $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 0% BENEFITS -UNEMPLOYMENT 34,500 257 471 34,029 1% SUPPLIES 3,000 - 523 2,477 17% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 626,920 45,054 73,904 553,016 12% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 377 373 6,127 6% RENTAL/LEASE 3,600 3,600 3,600 - 100% INSURANCE 534,440 418,367 536,735 (2,295) 100% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - - - - 0% MISCELLANEOUS 69,010 46,246 40,272 28,738 58% INTERGOVT SERVICES 10,302,760 2,470,507 2,472,830 7,829,930 24% ECA LOAN PAYMENT 135,000 - - 135,000 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2,909,320 936,429 1,972,891 32% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 168,300 - 168,300 0% INSTALLMENT PURCHASES - - - 0% OTHER DEBT - - - 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 46,150 - 46,150 0% DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS - - - 0% FISCAL AGENT FEES 33 - - 0% INTERFUND SERVICES - - - - 0% $ 14,939,500 $ 2,984,442 $ 4,065,136 $ 10,874,364 27% 14 Packet Pg. 147 I 3.4.a I Page 3 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENTIN DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent PO LIC E S ERVIC ES SALARIES $ 5,778,330 $ 875,225 $ 933,848 $ 4,844,482 16% OVERTIME 396,240 74,540 76,840 319,400 19% HOLIDAY BUYBACK 217,790 - - 217,790 0% BENEFITS 2,220,940 339,118 364,732 1,856,208 16% UNIFORMS 80,310 11,432 11,184 69,126 14% SUPPLIES 86,730 9,737 9,284 77,446 11% SMALL EQUIPMENT 20,400 1,363 907 19,493 4% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 117,170 16,692 15,397 101,773 13% COMMUNICATIONS 26,210 2,506 4,564 21,646 17% TRAVEL 17,310 3 248 17,062 1% ADVERTISING - - - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 595,100 95,171 98,403 496,697 17% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 14,620 955 671 13,949 5% Q. MISCELLANEOUS 46,850 7,829 5,841 41,009 12% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 10 550 5 272 5 274 5 276 50% !Y COMMUNITY SERVIC ES/EC 0 N DEV. SALARIES BENEFITS SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENT AL/LEASE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES /PLANNING SALARIES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENT AL/LEASE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SALARIES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL RENT AL/LEASE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS $ 9,628,550 $ L439,842 $ 1,527,193 $ 8,101,357 16% t C $ 224,960 $ 35,992 $ 37,650 $ 187,310 17% 0 67,430 10,373 11,452 55,978 17% 7,000 - 14 6,986 0% �p 800 - 125 676 16% p 170,400 7,997 10,768 159,632 6% 1,490 101 185 1,305 12%+ 2,000 179 - 2,000 0% 0 - - - - 0% d 2,000 335 322 1,678 16% 500 - - 500 0% �C 7,000 934 629 6,371 9% $ 483,580 $ 55,912 $ 61,145 $ 422,435 13% c0 $ 1,433,430 $ 229,935 $ 234,957 $ 1,198,473 16% 1,300 - 1,344 (44) 103% 530,270 80,331 84,381 445,889 16% 500 - - 500 0% 16,100 2,047 2,012 14,088 12% 5,250 620 - 5,250 0% 403,960 6,771 21,058 382,902 5% 8,500 434 980 7,520 12% 4,250 - 850 3,400 20% - - - - 0% 24,750 6,955 3,303 21,447 13% 6,800 - 274 6,526 4% 38,860 9,586 12,194 26,666 31% $ 2,473,970 $ 336,679 $ 361,353 $ 2,112,617 15% $ 1,373,500 $ 203,707 $ 211,083 $ 1,162,417 15% 5,000 672 439 4,561 9% 561,900 80,177 83,378 478,522 15% 360 - - 360 0% - - - 0% 2,200 580 1,620 26% 465,000 - - 465,000 0% 11,800 847 1,764 10,036 15% 600 - - 600 0% 26,370 2,480 4,120 22,250 16% 2,600 - - 2,600 0% 21,000 1,675 2,446 18,554 12% $ 2,470,330 $ 289,558 $ 303,810 $ 2,166,520 12% 15 Packet Pg. 148 Page 4 of 4 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENTIN DETAIL 2016 Adopted 2/28/2015 2/29/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES $ 1,830,090 $ 263,724 $ 282,918 $ 1,547,172 15% OVERTIME 10,000 1,562 950 9,050 9% BENEFITS 695,310 98,964 105,271 590,039 15% UNIFORMS 5,370 2,194 458 4,912 9% SUPPLIES 117,500 13,407 13,688 103,812 12% SMALL EQUIPMENT 9,080 565 6,205 2,875 68% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 501,950 13,484 17,457 484,493 3% COMMUNICATIONS 30,140 808 733 29,407 2% TRAVEL 4,450 - - 4,450 0% ADVERTISING - - - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 170,310 26,401 26,306 144,004 15% PUBLIC UTILITY 175,000 20,815 21,431 153,569 12% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 50,800 14,235 12,195 38,605 24% MISCELLANEOUS 91,450 9,323 10,360 81,090 11% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - - 0% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 70,700 5,000 5,000 65,700 7% $ 3,762,150 $ 470,482 $ 502,972 $ 3,259,178 13% PUBLIC WORKS SALARIES $ 263,850 $ 42,411 $ 43,627 $ 220,223 17% OVERTIME 200 - - 200 0% BENEFITS 81,750 12,634 13,813 67,937 17% SUPPLIES 7,600 689 132 7,468 2% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 1,479 - 1,000 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 5 12 188 6% COMMUNICATIONS 1,350 75 112 1,238 8% TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 7,640 984 949 6,691 12% PUBLIC UTILITY 2,800 370 388 2,412 14% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,000 - - 1,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 3,900 3,900 0% $ 371,790 $ 58,648 $ 59,034 $ 312,756 16% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES 669,430 104,378 113,864 555,566 17% OVERTIME 2,500 598 2,722 (222) 109% BENEFITS 291,990 41,742 42,469 249,521 15% UNIFORMS 2,750 71 376 2,374 14% SUPPLIES 87,000 9,244 10,277 76,723 12% SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,000 295 197 2,803 7% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - - - 0% COMMUNICATIONS 14,000 1,987 1,765 12,235 13% TRAVEL - - - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 52,530 8,696 9,192 43,338 17% PUBLIC UTILITY 280,000 44,023 43,601 236,399 16% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 78,500 12,529 12,987 65,513 17% MISCELLANEOUS 2,100 1,229 3,147 (1,047) 150% $ 1,483,800 $ 224,792 $ 240,595 $ 1,243,205 16% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 40,691,280 $ 6,730,834 $ 7,893,221 $ 32,798,059 19% 16 Packet Pg. 149 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2016 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 1,918,337 $ February 4,634,891 March 6,893,920 April 10,554,422 May 18,443,843 June 20,419,802 July 22,540,807 August 24,729,200 September 26,735,162 October 29,955,787 November 37,295,545 December 39,266,670 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 1,918,337 $ 2,112,632 10.13% 2,716,554 4,307,339 -7.07% 2,259,028 3,660,503 7,889,420 1,975,960 2,121,005 2,188,392 2,005,962 3,220,626 7,339,758 1,971,125 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2016 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 189,874 $ February 316,058 March 479,194 April 640,872 May 800,918 June 986,094 July 1,276,157 August 1,480,830 September 1,690,614 October 1,875,616 November 2,069,074 December 2,200,000 189,874 $ 216,395 13.97% 126,183 447,070 41.45% 163,136 161,679 160,046 185,176 290,062 204,673 209,784 185,002 193,458 130,926 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 17 Packet Pg. 150 1 Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: February 2016 Year -to -Date Total $1,204,754 Wholesale Trade 50,868 Communications 37,353 Contractors 194,996 Misc Retail Trade 171,100 Health & Personal Care 19,165 Retail Eating & Drinking Acconnnodation 6,354 137,021 Business Services 97,087 Q. Gasoline Stations 5,336 Amusement & Recreation 2' t Automotive Repair 29,664-/ 10,432 Retail Food Stores 47,249 O Retail Automotive 285,803 �p rn Others 62,005 0 Clothing and Accessories 50,323 O m N Total Retail Automotive Business Services Misc Retail Trade Retail Eating & Drinking Retail Food Stores Wholesale Trade Others Automotive Repair Amusement & Recreation Accommodation Gasoline Stations Health & Personal Care Clothing and Accessories Communications Contractors ($40,000) Change in Sales Tax Revenue: February 2016 compared to February 2015 ($20,000) $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 18 Packet Pg. 151 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2016 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals % January $ 471,315 $ 471,315 $ 539,867 14.54% February 1,055,135 583,820 1,204,754 14.18% March 1,506,759 451,624 April 1,936,463 429,704 May 2,478,856 542,394 June 2,960,731 481,875 July 3,457,813 497,082 August 3,998,806 540,993 September 4,517,576 518,770 October 5,055,818 538,242 November 5,626,862 571,044 December 6,144,400 517,538 Sales and Use Tax 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget mar Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2016 Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 90,678 $ 90,678 $ 85,977 -5.18% February 190,868 100,190 176,574 -7.49% March 272,706 81,838 April 346,987 74,281 May 405,847 58,860 June 445,893 40,046 July 477,342 31,449 August 501,633 24,291 September 523,862 22,229 October 548,406 24,545 November 586,112 37,705 December 647,900 61,788 Gas Utility Tax 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year -Budget -0-- Prior Yeaz *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 19 Packet Pg. 152 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2016 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast TrD Actuals Variance January $ 125,356 $ 125,356 $ 91,384 -27.10% February 226,461 101,105 230,098 1.61% March 344,917 118,456 April 457,974 113,057 May 577,752 119,778 June 685,900 108,148 July 794,692 108,792 August 904,737 110,045 September 1,019,063 114,326 October 1,131,491 112,428 November 1,235,975 104,484 December 1,349,100 113,125 Telephone Utility Tax 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget --dr- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2016 1lectric Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly TrD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 155,396 $ 155,396 $ 177,383 14.15% February 311,244 155,848 348,280 11.90% March 463,906 152,662 April 612,759 148,854 May 749,676 136,917 June 854,497 104,821 July 956,312 101,815 August 1,049,934 93,622 September 1,145,581 95,647 October 1,239,871 94,290 November 1,346,584 106,712 December 1,451,800 105,216 Electric Utility Tax 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year -Budget --O-Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 20 Packet Pg. 153 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2016 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals January $ 573,717 $ 573,717 $ 553,882 -3.46% February 969,279 395,562 943,114 -2.70% March 1,534,923 565,644 April 1,915,226 380,303 May 2,481,868 566,642 June 2,912,390 430,522 July 3,586,469 674,079 August 4,157,711 571,242 September 4,946,125 788,414 October 5,503,014 556,889 November 6,162,012 658,998 December 6,572,750 410,738 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2016 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals January $ 238,091 $ 238,091 $ 238,442 14.15% February 750,139 512,049 750,909 11.90% March 988,469 238,330 April 1,200,403 211,933 May 1,439,120 238,718 June 1,651,173 212,053 July 1,891,010 239,837 August 2,403,804 512,795 September 2,641,727 237,923 October 2,853,622 211,895 November 3,092,120 238,497 December 3,304,340 212,220 Storm Water Sales 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -dr,- Prior Year O N 21 t a+ C O 2 �O O O *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 21 Packet Pg. 154 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2016 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals January $ 571,975 $ 571,975 $ 566,825 -0.90% February 1,033,695 461,721 1,035,133 0.14% March 1,603,598 569,903 April 2,066,627 463,029 May 2,641,462 574,835 June 3,110,919 469,457 July 3,697,613 586,694 August 4,168,968 471,356 September 4,762,598 593,630 October 5,236,709 474,111 November 5,819,454 582,746 December 6,291,410 471,956 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 22 Packet Pg. 155 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2016 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 4,534,064 $ 4,534,064 $ 4,953,956 9.26% February 7,039,425 2,505,361 7,893,221 12.13% March 10,195,267 3,155,842 April 14,199,472 4,004,205 May 16,374,414 2,174,942 June 20,134,963 3,760,549 July 23,368,286 3,233,323 August 26,955,976 3,587,690 September 30,559,040 3,603,064 October 33,147,709 2,588,669 November 36,747,228 3,599,518 December 40,691,280 3,944,052 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2016 Non -Departmental Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals % January $ 2,637,164 $ 2,637,164 $ 3,074,199 16.57% February 3,090,761 453,597 4,065,136 31.53% March 4,177,637 1,086,876 April 6,115,913 1,938,276 May 6,276,776 160,863 June 7,917,237 1,640,461 July 8,983,200 1,065,963 August 10,280,111 1,296,911 September 11,804,336 1,524,225 October 12,235,538 431,202 November 13,396,879 1,161,341 December 14,939,500 1,542,621 Non -Departmental 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year —Budget —dm- Prior Year O N 21 t a+ C O 2 �O O O *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 23 Packet Pg. 156 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2016 City Council Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 19,588 $ 19,588 $ 13,340 -31.90% February 43,238 23,650 27,668 -36.01% March 68,617 25,379 April 91,002 22,385 May 115,388 24,386 June 142,957 27,568 July 169,613 26,656 August 194,018 24,404 September 218,163 24,145 October 242,646 24,484 November 268,263 25,616 December 295,500 27,237 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2016 Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 22,161 $ 22,161 $ 21,296 -3.90% February 44,020 21,859 43,294 -1.65% March 65,603 21,583 April 86,693 21,090 May 108,016 21,323 June 129,368 21,352 July 151,400 22,032 August 172,781 21,380 September 193,702 20,921 October 217,172 23,470 November 239,237 22,065 December 260,250 21,013 Office of Mayor 300,000.00 250,000.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -dr,- Prior Year O O. N 21 t C O 2 �O CD O *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 24 Packet Pg. 157 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2016 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 28,028 $ 28,028 $ 25,054 -10.61% February 65,193 37,165 61,145 -6.21% March 101,769 36,576 April 152,174 50,405 May 189,175 37,001 June 223,124 33,949 July 264,279 41,155 August 303,281 39,002 September 346,067 42,786 October 388,176 42,108 November 429,367 41,192 December 483,580 54,213 City Clerk Community Services/Economic Development 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -dp- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 50,489 $ 50,489 $ 44,524 -11.81% February 96,125 45,635 87,838 -8.62% March 145,204 49,079 April 189,944 44,740 May 234,027 44,083 June 281,576 47,549 July 329,270 47,695 August 379,179 49,909 September 428,220 49,041 October 485,933 57,714 November 535,319 49,385 December 585,310 49,991 700,000 City Clerk 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 fp-07 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -dr- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 25 Packet Pg. 158 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2016 Human Resources Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 33,067 $ 33,067 $ 28,007 -15.30% February 68,688 35,621 58,708 -14.53% March 111,242 42,553 April 145,138 33,896 May 182,888 37,750 June 219,759 36,871 July 256,747 36,988 August 291,944 35,197 September 332,154 40,210 October 368,111 35,957 November 400,133 32,022 December 445,790 45,657 Human Resources 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget t Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2016 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 67,768 $ 67,768 $ 67,346 -0.62% February 140,999 73,231 145,300 3.05% March 219,268 78,269 April 293,243 73,975 May 365,511 72,268 June 440,872 75,361 July 515,865 74,993 August 594,541 78,676 September 669,574 75,033 October 750,559 80,985 November 828,307 77,748 December 909,270 80,963 Municipal Court 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 26 Packet Pg. 159 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Information Services 2016 Information Services Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast TrD Actuals Variance % January $ 87,065 $ 87,065 $ 55,507 -36.25% February 163,617 76,552 158,620 -3.05% March 224,796 61,179 April 281,617 56,821 May 331,746 50,129 June 381,470 49,725 July 448,514 67,044 August 521,686 73,171 September 590,807 69,121 October 648,167 57,360 November 735,478 87,311 December 900,110 164,632 Finance Information Services 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year - Budget -dr- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Finance 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast TrD Actuals Variance % January $ 97,947 $ 97,947 $ 62,994 -35.69% February 174,402 76,455 130,335 -25.27% March 249,528 75,126 April 330,097 80,569 May 403,825 73,728 June 478,183 74,359 July 551,010 72,826 August 624,240 73,230 September 699,491 75,251 October 782,345 82,854 November 857,044 74,699 December 939,820 82,776 Finance 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +Current Year - Budget -dP-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 27 Packet Pg. 160 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2016 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 61,797 $ 61,797 $ 60,070 -2.79% February 123,593 61,797 120,220 -2.73% March 185,390 61,797 April 247,187 61,797 May 308,983 61,797 June 370,780 61,797 July 432,576 61,797 August 494,373 61,797 September 556,170 61,797 October 617,966 61,797 November 679,763 61,797 December 741,560 61,797 Police 800,000 City Attorney 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +Current Year - Budget -dr- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals % January $ 742,439 $ 742,439 $ 771,955 3.98% February 1,500,827 758,388 1,527,193 1.76% March 2,270,564 769,738 April 3,024,634 754,070 May 3,778,474 753,839 June 4,596,174 817,700 July 5,361,301 765,126 August 6,134,061 772,761 September 6,899,091 765,029 October 7,695,105 796,015 November 8,764,862 1,069,757 December 9,628,550 863,688 Police 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year - Budget -*I'- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 28 Packet Pg. 161 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services 2016 Development Services Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals % January $ 187,956 $ 187,956 $ 170,060 -9.52% February 382,755 194,799 361,353 -5.59% March 596,922 214,167 April 791,247 194,325 May 991,993 200,746 June 1,183,614 191,621 July 1,388,451 204,836 August 1,596,781 208,330 September 1,803,127 206,345 October 2,032,106 228,979 November 2,241,805 209,699 December 2,473,970 232,165 Parks & Recreation Development Services 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget t Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals % January $ 242,792 $ 242,792 $ 252,899 4.16% February 503,727 260,935 502,972 -0.15% March 778,531 274,804 April 1,055,428 276,898 May 1,355,118 299,690 June 1,671,726 316,608 July 2,101,457 429,730 August 2,558,858 457,401 September 2,879,622 320,763 October 3,172,797 293,176 November 3,426,737 253,939 December 3,762,150 335,413 Parks & Recreation 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Yeaz Budget -dm- Prior Year O N 21 t r C O 2 �O CD O *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 29 Packet Pg. 162 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works 2016 Public Works Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 31,230 $ 31,230 $ 29,570 -5.31% February 62,130 30,900 59,034 -4.98% March 92,810 30,680 April 123,243 30,434 May 154,320 31,076 June 185,380 31,060 July 216,622 31,243 August 246,986 30,363 September 276,279 29,293 October 308,266 31,987 November 337,169 28,904 December 371,790 34,621 Facilities Maintenance Public Works 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget --AP- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 115,588 $ 115,588 $ 116,661 0.93% February 236,621 121,033 240,595 1.68% March 365,554 128,934 April 487,500 121,946 May 604,005 116,504 June 723,757 119,752 July 857,071 133,314 August 967,719 110,648 September 1,099,287 131,567 October 1,211,418 112,132 November 1,335,849 124,431 December 1,483,800 147,951 Facilities Maintenance 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --#- Current Year -Budget --O-Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 30 Packet Pg. 163 1 I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2016 Engineering Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Variance Actuals January $ 198,055 $ 198,055 $ 160,475-18.97% February 396,423 198,368 303,810-23.36% March 597,281 200,858 April 796,160 198,879 May 1,001,003 204,843 June 1,201,964 200,961 July 1,401,670 199,706 August 1,603,612 201,942 September 1,807,951 204,339 October 2,023,470 215,519 November 2,232,307 208,838 December 2,470,330 238,023 Engine a ring 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget —dp— Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 31 Packet Pg. 164 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY I 3.4.a I City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Summary As of February 29, 2016 (a) Term Purchase Purchase Maturity Agency/Issuer Investment Type (months) Date Price Date Washington State Local Investment Pool Various $12,151,033 Various Government Investment Pool Snohomish County Investment Pool Various $35,431,490 Various Investment Pool FHLMC Bonds 60 12/28/2012 1,000,000 12/28/2017 FHLMC Bonds 54 12/27/2012 1,000,000 6/27/2017 FNMA Bonds 60 9/19/2014 1,000,000 9/19/2019 FICO Bonds 33 9/19/2014 1,027,000 6/6/2017 FFCB Bonds 36 1/25/2016 2,000,000 12/28/2018 FFCB Bonds 37 1/25/2016 2,000,000 1/25/2019 FHLMC Bonds 33 2/19/2016 1,000,000 11/19/2018 (a) To maturity. Yield to Weighted Maturity Average 0.420% 0.090% 0.83% 0.521 % O 0.90% 0.016% 2, t 0.75% 0.013% c O 1.87% 0.033% co rn 0.96% 0.017% o 1.42% 0.050% p m 1.23% 0.043% w 1.25% 0.022% TOTAL $56,609,523 0.81 % 0.806% Investment Mix % of Total Rate Comparison State Investment Pool 21.5% Current 6-month treasury rate 0.49% Bonds 15.9% Current State Pool rate 0.42% Snohomish County Investment Pool 62.6% Blended Edmonds rate 0.81% 32 Packet Pg. 165 3.4.a GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND & SUBFUNDS ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31 /2015 1 /1 /2016 2/28/2016 Q1 YTD 001-General Fund $ 8,302,756 $ 5,459,348 $ 4,716,874 $ - $ (3,585,88: 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 519,409 504,644 477,074 - (42,33t 011-Risk Management Fund 961,512 961,955 962,390 - 87t 0 012-Contingency Reserve Fund 1,670,576 1,671,342 1,672,096 - 1,52( 013-Mulitmodal Transportation FD 56,487 56,513 56,538 - 5, >, 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 9,026 9,030 9,034 - 2 016-Building Maintenance 114,768 119,392 133,427 - 18,65t 0 Total General Fund & Subfunds $ 11,634,534 $ 8,782,224 $ 8,027,434 $ - $ (3,607,10( rn 0 0 a m c 0 General Fund & Subfunds ii 18 2' t 16 .r 0 14 2 $11.63 t° 12 0 N 10 $8.78 $8.03 0 8 �C 0 L G 6 u_ 4 2 E - t v Dec 2015 Jan 2016 Feb 2016 Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2016 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2015 Financial Statements. 33 Packet Pg. 166 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW I 3.4.a I GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS General Fund & Subfunds Special Revenue Debt Service Total Governmental Funds 16 14 12 10 c 0 8 6 4 2 FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31 /2015 1/1/2016 2/28/2016 $ 11,634,534 $ 8,782,224 $ 8,027,434 $ 8,003,446 9,442,444 9,937,132 114,790 114,790 115,564 $ 19,752,770 $ 18,339,458 $ 18,080,129 1 $ Governmental Fund Balances -By Fund Group 24 General Fund & Subfunds 18 t Special o Revenue 12 Debt Service $0.11 $0.11 $0.12 Dec 2015 Jan 2016 Feb 2016 6 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- Q1 YTD - $ (3,607,10, - 1,933,68, - 77 - $ (1,672,64 0 a a� , r c 0 a Governmental Fund Balances - Combined 0) 0 Dec 2015 Jan 2016 Feb 2016 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning balances for 2016 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2015 Financial Statements. 34 Packet Pg. 167 1 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW I 3.4.a I GOVERNMENTAL SPECIAL REVENUE 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund 111 - Street Fund 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 118 - Memorial Street Tree 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 125 - Real Estate Tax 2 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 129 - Special Projects Fund 130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 132 - Parks Construction Fund 136 - Parks Trust Fund 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 138 - Sister City Commission 139 - Transportation Benefit District 140 - Business Improvement Disrict Total Special Revenue FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE; $ 19,131 $ 87,367 $ 71,138 $ 513,008 437,356 411,912 392,728 1,513,341 2,714,817 468,470 467,446 465,260 17,919 17,927 17,935 153,435 158,775 158,871 64,481 69,662 71,294 15,469 15,289 15,296 84,418 84,190 84,575 1,607,434 1,822,369 1,819,277 2,216,905 2,330,928 1,967,598 265,924 268,048 277,668 38,393 38,411 38,428 137,256 134,327 138,476 901,968 863,094 541,055 152,249 152,319 152,388 883,730 885,159 887,183 3,785 3,787 3,789 0 0 0 66,743 92,648 100,170 $ 8,003,446 $ 9,442,444 $ 9,937,132 $ Special Revenue Funds 10 $9.44 $9.94 9 $8.00 8 7 c 6 0 5 4 3 2 1 Dec 2015 Jan 2016 Feb 2016 ACTUAL 52, 00 1 (101, 09( 2,322,W (3,21( 1( 5,43E 6,81: - (17. a 15£ 0 211,84: (249, 30 1 c 11,74z 0 3,1 .. 1,22( (360,91: 13t 3,45z a 33,42( - $ 1.933.68( *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2016 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2015 Financial Statements. Special Revenue 35 Packet Pg. 168 I 3.4.a I ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS 12/31/2015 1/1/2016 2/28/2016 Q1 YTD 421 - Water Utility Fund $ 20,079,417 $ 20,471,272 $ 20,440,890 $ - $ 361,47' 422 - Storm Utility Fund 13,776,027 14,320,271 14,188,251 - 412,22z L 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 51,338,549 51,944,135 51,909,129 - 570,58( a- 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 843,912 843,913 843,913 - aD W 21 411 - Combined Utility Operation - 115,963 25,583 - 25,58, r Total Enterprise Funds $ 86,037,905 $ 87,695,553 $ 87,407,767 $ - $ 1,369,86, o m as 0 r r L 0 Q d R Enterprise Fund Balances as of February 29, 2016 = ii $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $51,909,129 $50,000,000 0 $40, 000,000 0 N $30,000,000 $20,440,890 $20,000,000 0 3 L $10,000,000 $25,583 $843,913 Li $ Combined Utility Water Storm Sewer/WWTP Bond Reserve 0 E *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2016 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2015 Financial Statements. 36 Packet Pg. 169 3.4.a SUMMARY OVERVIEW FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES CITY-WIDE ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31 /2015 1/1/2016 2/28/2016 Q1 YTD Governmental Funds $ 19,752,770 $ 18,339,458 $ 18,080,129 $ - $ (1,672,64- Enterprise Funds 86,037,905 87,695,553 87,407,767 - 1,369,86,- Internal Services Fund 7,384,801 7,450,109 7,543,590 - 158,79( Agency Funds 203,101 198,476 194,925 - (8,17( Total City-wide Total $113,378,577 $113,683,596 $113,226,412 $ - $ (152,16, 0 0 a a� Governmental Fund Balances as of February 29, 2016 r c 0 General Fund & Subfunds $8,027,43� Drug Enforcement Fund $71,138 �p Street Fund $411,912 c Combined Street Const/Improve Fund $2,714, 17 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 1 $465,260 Memorial Street Fund $17,935 Q Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund $158,871 m Employee Parking Permit Fund $71,294 Youth Scholarship Fund $15,296 v Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts $84,575 Real Estate Excise Tax 2 $1,819,2 7 O I.L Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq $1,967,5 8 ::, Gifts Catalog Fund $277,668 a Special Projects Fund $38,428 O Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement $138,476 Parks Construction Fund $541,055 T Parks Trust Fund $152,388 N Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund $887,183 Sister City Commission $3,789 Transportation Benefit District $ (0) Business Improvement District $100,170 m LL L.I.D. Fund Control $10,429 L.I.D. Guaranty Fund $105,135 O 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund $ (0) E Equipment Rental Fund = $7,543,59( u Firemen's Pension Fund $194,925 a $1 $20,000,000 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2016 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2015 Financial Statements. 37 Packet Pg. 170 3.4.a INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND INTERNAL SERVICE BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- - - ACTUAL ---- FUNDS 12/31 /2015 1 /1 /2016 2/28/2016 011 YTD 511 - Equipment Rental Fund $ 7,384,801 $ 7,450,109 $ 7,543,590 $ - $ 158,79( L 0 Total Internal Service Funds $ 7,384,801 $ 7,450,109 $ 7,543,590 $ - $ 158,79( t r c 0 m 0 r Internal Service Fund Balances r `0 a m 10 .v c �a c 8 $7 45 $7.54 IL , t 6 c c 511- Equipment Rental Fund o N 4 >, 3 L 2 m iy E Dec 2015 Jan 2016 Feb 2016 M Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. The beginning fund balances for 2016 are preliminary, these will be updated after the completion of the 2015 Financial Statements. 38 Packet Pg. 171 3.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Authorize the Mayor to Sign Funding Agreement with Public Hospital District No. 2, Snohomish County, Washington to Provide the 2016 Health & Fitness Expo Staff Lead/Author: Renee McRae Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Initiated By: The City of Edmonds, Move 60!, Edmonds School District and Swedish Edmonds are planning the 4th Annual Health & Fitness Expo for Saturday, May 14, 2016, at the Edmonds-Woodway High School Stadium. This free event brings together our community partners to promote health and fitness for families that live within the Edmonds School District and PHD #2 boundaries. This year's event includes 50+ booths, free health screenings, Active Zone, Kids Fun Run, 5k, Bike Rodeo, snack samples, children's gardening and more. This is the third year that Public Hospital District #2, Snohomish County (Verdant Health Commission) has sponsored the event at the $2,000 level. Since the City and PHD2 are both public agencies, an agreement to provide the Expo is necessary to receive the $2,000. City Council reviewed the agreement at the March 22, 2016 Council meeting. Forward the agreement to the consent agenda for approval at the April 5, 2016 Council meeting. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Attachments: Expo funding agreement 2016 Packet Pg. 172 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE A HEALTH & FITNESS EXPO This Agreement is made between Public Hospital District No. 2, Snohomish County, Washington and the City of Edmonds to provide a Health & Fitness Expo. 1. PARTIES 1.1 Public Hospital District No. 2, Snohomish County, Washington ("PHD2"), a public hospital district formed under Chapter 70.44 RCW; and 1.2 The City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City". 1.3 Hereinafter, PHD2 and the City are each referred individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties". 2. PURPOSE AND PROGRAM 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to enable the City to provide the Health & Fitness Expo for the benefit of PHD2 residents. 2.2 The Health & Fitness Expo is a community event held in Edmonds on May 14, 2016 that enables partners to come together to promote health and wellness and fitness for families in South Snohomish County. 3. AUTHORITY 3.1 PHD2 is authorized under RCW 70.44.240 to "contract" with any "legal entity" to "provide any hospital or other health care facilities or other health care services to be used by individuals, districts, hospitals, or others, including providing health care maintenance services." 3.2 The City is a Washington municipal corporation. 4. TERM AND TERMINATION 4.1 The Agreement will begin on the date of the second signature on this Agreement. 4.2 The Agreement will end when the final reporting by the City is accepted and approved by PHD2. 5. OBLIGATIONS OF PHD2 5.1 PHD2 will fund the Health & Fitness Expo provided by the City with $2,000 to be paid on a one-time basis on or before April 15, 2016. #A246 PAGE 1 OF 3 Packet Pg. 173 3.5.a 6. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY OF EDMONDS 6.1 The City will coordinate the Health & Fitness Expo to take place on May 14, 2016, and will provide management, marketing, and logistical support to organize the event. The free event will include health and wellness information and activities and multiple opportunities for families to be active and learn about healthy behaviors. 6.2 The City will submit a report of activities carried out under the program including summaries of results to PHD2 by August 15, 2016. 6.3 City of Edmonds will recognize PHD2's support of the event through the following means: PHD2 will be named in media press releases and alerts, PHD2's logo will be included on materials, PHD2 will be recognized through event announcements at the event, and PHD2 will be provided with promotional table space. 6.4 The City recognizes that PHD2 is a public agency subject to audit by the Washington State Auditor. The City will provide PHD2 with any accessible information that PHD2 is requested to provide to the Washington State Auditor or otherwise required to provide to the State of Washington or to the Federal Government or pursuant to the Washington Public Records Act. 7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 7.1 Relationship of the Parties. The relationship created between PHD2 and City in this Agreement is strictly that of independent contractors. The Agreement creates no partnership or joint venture between the parties, nor may any officer or employee of one party be considered to be an employee or agent of the other. Further, the Agreement provides no rights to any third parties and may not be relied on by any other person or entity. 7.2 Applicable Law. The Agreement is entered under the laws of the State of Washington. Any litigation arising from this Agreement must be filed in Snohomish County Superior Court. 7.3 Liability and Insurance. City of Edmonds will indemnify, defend and hold PHD2 harmless from any claims, lawsuits or other actions, and judgments arising in any way from the Health & Fitness Expo program provided under this Agreement. 7.4 Entire Agreement; Amendments. This Agreement is complete and integrates all understandings between the parties. No amendment or other change to the Agreement will be binding on either party unless agreed to in writing and signed by each party. 7.5 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction rules any part of this Agreement to be invalid, the remainder of the Agreement will still be in full force and effect. 7.6 Force Ma'e1 ure. Neither party will be in default or liable for failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement if that failure is due to causes beyond its reasonable control including, but not limited to, acts of God, acts of terrorism, fires, floods, windstorms earthquakes, labor disputes or governmental acts. #A246 PAGE 2 OF 3 Packet Pg. 174 3.5.a 7.7 Notices and Reporting. Any notice or reporting required or otherwise given under this Agreement will be considered delivered or given when actually delivered or 48 hours after being deposited in the U.S. Mail as certified mail addressed to the following: To PHD2: Carl Zapora, Superintendent Public Hospital District No. 2, Snohomish County 4710 1961h Street Lynnwood, WA 98036 To City of Edmonds: Ren6e McRae City of Edmonds 700 Mail Street Edmonds, WA 98020 7.8 Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned without the written consent of the other party. Each party may consent to or decline a request for assignment by the other party at the sole discretion of the party from which consent is requested. AGREED TO: PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 2 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date: Carl Zapora, Superintendent CITY OF EDMONDS Date: David O. Earling, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Office of the City Attorney #A246 PAGE 3 OF 3 Packet Pg. 175 3.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with BHC for Dayton St. Utility Replacement (3rd to 9th Ave) Staff Lead/Author: Megan Luttrell Department: Engineering Initiated By: The City recently completed a drainage study for the North Shellabarger Sub basin. The results of the study show that various drainage pipe improvements will be needed in order to address drainage issues along Dayton Street and throughout the rest of the study's basin. In addition, Water and Sewer comprehensive plans completed in 2010 and 2013 respectively show the need for replacement and/or upsizing of utilities in the downtown core either due to age, increased maintenance needs and/or additional flow needs. Since there is a need to replace/upgrade most of the utilities along the Dayton Street alignment, City staff has concluded that a comprehensive utility replacement project be completed along Dayton Street from 3rd to 9tn The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in November 2015 to hire a consultant to provide design engineering services for the Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project. The City received statements of qualifications from five engineering firms. The selection committee selected BHC to provide design engineering services for the Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project. The design engineering for the Project is expected to be complete by Winter 2016/2017, with construction expected to begin in Spring 2017. The proposed design fee is $496,800. The amount includes a $30,000 management reserve for unforeseen conditions and revisions that may be uncovered during the design development phase. On March 22, 2015, staff presented this item to Council and it was forwarded to a future consent agenda for approval. Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Attachments: BHC Agreement Packet Pg. 176 3.6.a s CITY OF EDMONDS DAVE EARLING 121 5T" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR Website: www.edmondswa.gov l890 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and BHC Consultants, LLC hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"; WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a consulting firm to provide consulting services with respect to the Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit B, provided, in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of $496,800. E a� L B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment Q pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each = voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City biweekly during the 0° progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that r has not been submitted to the City Engineer three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such U 2 late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment a cycle. C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. 1 Packet Pg. 177 3.6.a 3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the Consultant, provided, however, that: A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become the property of the City. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and copy any work product during normal office hours. Documents prepared under this agreement and in the possession of the Consultant may be subject to public records request and release under Chapter 42.56 RCW. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost. 4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Indemnification / Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall defend, m indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, demands, or suits at law or equity arising from the acts, 3 errors or omissions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries Cn a and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction N determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting r from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall E be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. m The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, E the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 U RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section a shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the term of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Packet Pg. 178 3.6.a Insurance Coverage A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the State. B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit. D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the City. The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. 7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written notification to the City and the City's prior written consent. c as E as as L a U 2 m c as E M U 2 a Packet Pg. 179 3.6.a 10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said termination. 11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document, the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exibit B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibits A or B, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. 13. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound engineering practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Services. 14. Non -waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non -assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and a Packet Pg. 180 licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. 18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address: BHC Consultants, LLC 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed. DATED THIS DAY OF , 20 CITY OF EDMONDS BHC CONSULTANTS, LLC By By a David O. Earling, Mayor c Its r r c as E ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: L El U 2 m Scott Passey, City Clerk c a) E z U APPROVED AS TO FORM: a Office of the City Attorney Packet Pg. 181 3.6.a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Pg. 182 3.6.a EXHIBIT A CITY OF EDMONDS DAYTON STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT (3RD AVE to 91h AVE) CONSULTANT SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES March 14, 2016 This scope of services describes the engineering services to be performed by BHC Consultants, LLC (BHC) and subconsultants — KPG, Inc. (transportation engineering services) and Landau Associates (geotechnical engineering services) for the City of Edmond's (City) Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave). Project improvements are anticipated to include replacement of the City's water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater systems; limited ADA curb ramp improvements; as well as the restoration of existing streetscape features disturbed as part of utility replacement construction along Dayton Street, from 3rd Ave S to 9th Ave S, located within City limits. Restoration will generally consist of in -kind replacement of areas removed by utility installation. No modification of existing curb locations, sidewalk widths, or surfacing types are anticipated. The City's 2010 Water System Plan, 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, and Drainage Study for the North Shellaberger Stormwater Sub -basin provide the basis for the project's utility replacements. Replacement and/or upsizing of the individual utilities are required due to either condition, age, maintenance requirements and/or capacity needs. Dayton Street, between 3rd Ave S and 9th Ave S, is a minor arterial roadway located within the City's downtown area and is lined by the City's Library, a community center and park, numerous local commercial businesses, as well as single family residences. This scope of services is based on our understanding of the City's needs and requirements gained from the project RFQ, a meeting on 2/16/16 and other related discussions and preliminary input received from City staff. Based on discussions with City staff, we understand there may be a desire to separate the project into multiple phases of construction. We also understand that the project costs will be distributed amongst the three individual City utility funds. Proposed Work Scope The following efforts are anticipated. 1. Project Development: Prepare for and meet with City personnel to review and discuss the project and relevant background, verify/refine the desired project scope, and desired consultant assistance. 2. Information Research, Collection and Review/Kick-Off Meeting: Collect and review existing available City information - documents, as-builts, and other pertinent available information to further understand and identify the City's and others' P. 1 of 7 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 183 3.6.a existing facilities and equipment and systems' current operating conditions and procedures relevant to the project. BHC will also visit the project site and meet with City personnel to: • understand and identify the City's existing utility systems and City and other existing or planned infrastructure in the vicinity of the project; • review and discuss project goals and objectives, understanding and requirements of desired improvements, and work plan • meet with subconsultants; and • review City -furnished base map. BHC will also perform a project site visit following the completion of the field survey and preparation of the base map but prior to 30% design. 3. Conceptual Design and Alternatives Analysis: Investigate and develop up to two (2) alternative alignments for each of the City utilities for the project to a conceptual level. Each alternative will be developed for consideration relative to City goals and functional requirements. The conceptual design analysis will be performed to a sufficient level of detail to evaluate and select a preferred alternative for the project including identifying required general elements/facilities/features, as well as develop a planning -level opinion of probable construction cost for the project. Existing available topographic information, GIS data, and other mapping provided by the City or others will be used to identify and illustrate the project's conceptual alignments. The conceptual design, alternatives analysis and project recommendations will be documented in a brief technical memorandum — to be used as the basis for continued design development. The memorandum will address the following: • project constraints and considerations as well as applicable design criteria, related requirements, and/or assumptions; • proposed improvements description, project elements identified and preliminary sizing of major features; • consider advantages and disadvantages of alternatives; • schematic figures (plan only) illustrating conceptual alignments; • conceptual -level opinion of probable construction cost; and • a recommendation regarding a preferred alignment alternative considering the conceptual design and alternatives analysis described above along with other applicable considerations agreed to with the City. A single version of the technical memorandum will be prepared. 4. ADA Assessment: Provide the following ADA assessment and related work in support of the project. • Provide field work at intersections along Dayton Street from 3rd Avenue to 91" Avenue with a smart level to determine ADA compliance and create a spreadsheet for City use and files. • Provide preliminary plans for upgraded ADA ramps and/or Maximum Extent Feasible (MEF) documentation for review and approval by the City. * For applicable assumptions and further details — see also KPG (3/11/16) proposal (copy attached) 5. Preliminary Engineering and Design (30%): Complete preliminary design (30% level) for the project based on the identified, defined and previously described improvements. Design of project improvements will be developed utilizing the City -furnished base map. Develop and define project improvements sufficiently P. 2 of 7 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 184 3.6.a to further evaluate the proposed alignments, identify required elements/facilities, as well as develop a planning -level opinion of probable construction cost for the project. The following will be provided/performed as part of this effort: • preliminary layout of the anticipated improvements/alignments; • preliminary design drawings (30% level — plan and profile drawings) illustrating the anticipated improvements/alignments; and • preliminary (planning -level) opinion of probable construction cost. 6. Geotechnical Investigation/Engineering Services: Provide geotechnical engineering and related services relative to the design of the project. The geotechnical engineering and related services will include review of existing available soil data and limited subsurface explorations as specifically defined in the Geotechnical subconsultant's proposal. Based on an analysis of this information, the project understanding, and other similar projects, recommendations will be made for design and construction of project improvements. In general, services will include: • Review Existing Data — Review readily available existing geotechnical and geologic data for the project area to gain an overview of general geologic conditions and to aid in iden- tifying geotechnical factors that might have an impact on the design and construction of the project. • Subsurface Explorations/Testing and Laboratory Analysis (Limited) — Perform limited subsurface explorations for the identified project locations consisting of up to eight (8) exploratory borings (up to a depth of 20 feet) and laboratory analyses to determine sub- surface soil and groundwater conditions along the project corridors/alignments. The subsurface explorations will be spaced and located at relatively unobtrusive locations based on the planned project alignments, field reconnaissance, and review of geologic and geotechnical information in the vicinity of the project. Soil samples will be taken from the explorations at various depths to be determined by the field engineer/geologist during exploration. Soils observed in the excavations will be evaluated for consistency with the general geologic conditions reviewed, as described previously above. • Laboratory tests will be conducted on select soil samples to determine engineering properties necessary for design. Limited chemical analytical testing will be completed if field screening indicates a presence of potentially contaminated soils. • Engineering Analysis - Evaluate data derived from the subsurface explorations and la- boratory testing with respect to design and construction of the project. Geotechnical recommendations will be determined by the Geotechnical subconsultant regarding trench excavation, dewatering requirements, shoring and backfill, pavement reconstruc- tion and other related project requirements and considerations. • Geotechnical Summary Report - Prepare a brief report to summarize the results of the subsurface explorations, analyses, and geotechnical recommendations pertaining to the design of the project. • Project Specification Assistance — Review and assist with appropriate sections of the technical specifications. * For further details — see 3/11/2016 Landau Associates proposal (copy attached) 7. Stormwater Compliance Report: Perform a stormwater code assessment by reviewing project areas of new and replaced im- pervious surfaces and evaluating applicable stormwater requirements in accordance with ECC Chapter 18.30 and the Edmonds Stormwater Code Supplement. The assessment will also include the preparation of a report that documents the stormwater code assessment. P. 3 of 7 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 185 3.6.a * For applicable assumptions and further details — see also KPG (3/11/16) proposal (copy attached) 8. Cultural Resources Assessment: Conduct a cultural resources assessment for the project corridor only, as specifically defined in the Archaeological subconsultant's proposal, including the following efforts: • Prepare a brief Cultural Resources Assessment memorandum (CRA) - The CRA will assess potential for archaeological and historic resources by reviewing relevant literature and historic maps, photographs, and plans. The project plans will be compared to the assessment of archaeological potential, and to the locations of known historic structures, to determine whether there may be impacts to cultural and historic resources. These findings and associated recommendations will be documented in the CRA, which will meet all applicable state and federal documentation standards for cultural resources reports. • SEPA Response/Inadvertent Discovery Plan - Provide responses to SEPA Question 13 regarding cultural and historic resources. We will also provide an Inadvertent Discovery Plan to be maintained on site during construction. * For further details — see 3/10/2016 Anchor/QEA proposal (copy attached) 9. Franchise Utilities and WSDOT Coordination (Limited): Provide franchise utilities and WSDOT coordination as requested by the City for the project. • Coordinate with Franchise Utilities — Coordinate with franchise utilities (i.e. Snohomish County PUD#1, PSE, ComCast Cable, Frontier Communications NW) as required during the project. • Coordinate with WSDOT — Coordinate with WSDOT regarding the project. A limited effort has been budgeted for this work based on discussions with City staff. 10. Public Information and Outreach: Provide public information and outreach assistance as requested by the City during the pro- ject, including the following: • Prepare presentation materials and attend two (2) Downtown Business and Resident Open House Meetings. • Conduct one-on-one meeting with property owners (estimate 20) to discuss the project and potential impacts. • Prepare postcard handouts and attend up to four (4) City public events, as needed. • Prepare outreach materials for project updates to be reproduced and distributed by the City. • Provide text and illustrative graphics for City hosted website and social media (uploaded and maintained by City). * For applicable assumptions and further details — see also KPG (3/11/16) pro- posal (copy attached) 11. Final Design and Preparation of Bid Documents: Perform, prepare and deliver to the City design plans, specifications, opinions of probable construction cost, and bid documents for the new water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater system piping, related system appurtenances, and connections or adjustments to existing or proposed facilities as well as related ROW restoration work for the project. The project scope will be limited to the utility replacement improvements described previously herein. It is anticipated the project will also include the following: ADA curb ramp improvements for P. 4 of 7 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 186 3.6.a crosswalks perpendicular (only) to Dayton Street as well as the restoration of other streetscape features (hardscape, channelization and plantings) disturbed as part of utility replacement construction. Design of project improvements will be developed utilizing the City -furnished base maps, utility system and other related information as applicable; and will be in accordance with the City's current design standards, applicable codes and regulations, and generally accepted industry standards and practices. Plans, specifications, opinion(s) of probable construction cost and associated bidding documents will be developed for design of the project. Draft documents will be prepared at the 60 percent and 90 percent level of completion for review by the City. • The fee estimate is based on the following preliminary drawing/sheet list. This drawing list (up to 52 sheets total) represents BHC's best judgment as to the drawings that will be required for design of the project. - Cover Sheet, Location Map, and Index of Drawings (1 sheet) - Key Map, Survey and Construction C/L Control (1 sheet) - General, Survey, and TESC Notes (1 sheet) - Legend, Abbreviations, Symbols, and Designations (1 sheet) - Water Main Replacement Plan and Profiles (8 sheets) - Sanitary Sewer Replacement Plan and Profiles (8 sheets) - Storm Sewer Replacement Plan and Profiles (w/ TESC BMPs) (8 sheets) - Curb Ramp Plans (7 sheets) - Restoration Plans (including Channelization) (8 sheets) - Construction Phasing/Staging Schematic Plans (4 sheets) - Standard and Miscellaneous Details (5 sheets) Relevant other applicable standard plans (e.g. City or WSDOT) will be referenced and appended to the bid documents. • A project manual including bid information, contract forms, general specifications, and technical specifications for bidding and construction of the project will be prepared. The design specifications for the project will be based on the 2016 edition of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT/APWA) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, as well as the City's Standard Specifications that modify or supplement the Standard Specifications. The City's standard bid information, contract forms, general conditions and/or requirements, special provisions and technical specifications that supplement or modify the WSDOT Standard Specifications will be used and modified (as appropriate) for the project. A single set of bid documents is an- ticipated for the project. • An opinion of probable construction cost (OPCC) for each of the final design submittals will be developed. * For applicable assumptions and further details regarding transportation engi- neering subconsultant's related efforts — see also KPG (3/11/16) proposal (copy attached) 12. Assistance During Bid Period (Limited): Provide the following support and assistance to the City during the bid period. At the City's request, respond to inquiries and requests for clarification from the bidders and/or others re- garding the bid documents. As needed or appropriate, prepare the necessary text and/or drawing revisions or supplemental drawings to be included in an addendum which will be prepared, finalized, and issued/distributed by the City. Provide related miscellaneous sup- port and assistance during the bid period, including general communication and coordination with City staff and others to exchange information, provide assistance, discuss related is- P. 5 of 7 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 187 3.6.a sues, coordinate efforts, etc. A limited effort has been budgeted for this work based on dis- cussions with City staff. 13. Support During Construction (Limited): Attend a pre -construction conference. Contribute to the agenda for the meeting and participate in the discussion of the technical aspects of the project. BHC's Project Engineer will attend. A limited effort has been budgeted for this work based on discussions with City staff. If additional support during construction efforts are desired/required, additional budget may be required. * For applicable assumptions and further details regarding transportation engi- neering and geotechnical engineering subconsultants' related efforts — see also KPG (3/11/16) proposal and Landau (3/11/16) proposal (copies attached) 14. Communication/Coordination/Meeting(s): Maintain regular communications (phone, facsimile, e-mail) and coordinate with City per- sonnel to exchange information, discuss related issues, and coordinate efforts. Meet with City staff to review and discuss the project's design development. It is anticipated that up to four (4) additional meetings (not otherwise identified above) will be held, following each of the design review submittals to discuss the project. The Project Manager and Project Engi- neer will attend the meetings. A limited effort has been budgeted for this work based on discussions with City staff. If additional meetings or coordination and communication time is required, additional budget may be requested. 15. Quality Assurance/Quality Control: A senior engineer (not directly associated with the project) will review draft documents for completeness, clarity, coordination, and/or other quality considerations. 16. Project Management: Provide project management, coordination and administration throughout the project. These efforts include those associated with initial contracting and project setup, management of consultant team and preparation of monthly invoices. The budget assumes a project dura- tion of up to thirty (30) consecutive calendar months, ending no later than December 31, 2018. 17. Record Drawings: Prepare record drawings for the project incorporating revisions to the drawings as marked up on the City inspector's and construction contractor's record drawing sets. An electronic copy (DWG and pdf files) on a CD will be provided to the City. The extent of work, which may be required under this activity, cannot be accurately predicted. A limited effort has been budgeted for this task based on discussions with City staff. Deliverables Summary: • Conceptual Design Drawings and Technical Memorandum • Scroll Plot of Full Buildout on Dayton Street • ADA Compliance Worksheet • Preliminary (30%) Design Drawings and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost • Geotechnical Report • Cultural Resources Assessment Memorandum • Stormwater Compliance Report P. 6 of 7 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 188 3.6.a • Design Review Documents, Specs & Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - (60% & 90%) Submittals • Final Design/Bid Documents & Opinion of Probable Construction Cost • Scroll Plots of Proposed Improvements for Open House • Meeting Graphics and Presentation Material for Open House • Project Outreach Graphics for Postcard, Flyer, and Mailer • Meeting Notes from One -on -One Meetings • Record Drawings Schedule We understand the importance and need for working closely with you and other City staff to per- form our work efficiently and complete our efforts in a timely manner. We are able to begin work upon receipt of a signed contract and notice to proceed, or other agreeable written authoriza- tion. With the City's authorization, we will begin our work and proceed in a timely manner with an anticipated overall project completion by no later than December 31, 2018. This schedule is based on timely input and information from City staff and others including the collection of requi- site information and documentation, staff input, and feedback regarding draft document(s) or other project matters. Should the actual project schedule/timeline differ substantially, additional budget may be required to cover additional related consultant costs. Management Reserve A budget allowance has been included as a management reserve for the project. At the City's request and direction, BHC may perform additional services not included in the above listed activities and/or provide additional information and/or detail beyond what is anticipated at this time. BHC shall perform such services and will be paid for such additional services via the management reserve when they are requested by written direction and authorization by the City's Project Manager. Attachment(s): • Assumption(s) • KPG, Inc. Proposal (dated 3/11/16) • Landau Associates Proposal (dated 3/11/16) • Anchor/QEA Proposal (dated 3/10/16) P. 7 of 7 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 189 3.6.a ATTACHMENT TO EXHIBIT A ASSUMPTION(S) The described efforts and scope of work as well as the associated fee estimate and schedule are predicated on the following assumptions. 1. The City will provide the following information to BHC: relevant engineering data, plans, specifications, reports/studies, topographical or other mapping, physical system information (as-builts), and/or other pertinent information available about the City's existing water, sanitary sewer and stormwater utility system/facilities relevant to the project, applicable City standards, design criteria, requirements, and/or preferences, deemed necessary for BHC's work. As described above and herein, pertinent data and information required for determining and evaluating the existing conditions (capacity and other operating/performance characteristics) as well as potential future needs and requirements will be provided by the City. 2. Special assumptions regarding design of the project: - Standard open trench methods and pipe support within an excavated trench, ex- cept as otherwise stated, will be suitable for construction. - An analysis of the City's water, sanitary sewer and stormwater utility systems and determination/identification of system requirements — sizing, etc. has been fur- nished by the City or others. Design of water, sanitary sewer and stormwater utility system facilities does not include a hydraulic analysis or evaluation of the existing system (characteristics, condition, or capacity) including both within and beyond the project limits. - Roadway restoration will consist of repairing the trench/excavation section and pavement patching, overlay and/or reconstruction as determined by the City. - Landscaping restoration (if any) will be minimal and will not require a landscape architect. - The following work is not included as part of BHC's efforts: 1) inspection of exist- ing facilities or field measurements or other quantification of system characteris- tics and/or conditions if needed for analysis or design; 2) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) preparation; 3) evaluation of, preliminary engineering, or design of TESC BMPs; 4) hydraulic or system operational analyses of re- quirements for upsized water, sanitary sewer and stormwater utility improve- ments and 5) preparation of other documentation beyond that specifically identi- fied and stated herein. 3. Conceptual drawings will include plan drawings only and will represent preliminary alignment (schematically) of proposed improvements. Details will not be prepared. 4. Preliminary design drawings (30%) will include plan and profile drawings only and will represent preliminary alignment, sizing and layout of proposed improvements. Details will not be prepared. 5. Per the City's request, BHC's work will be based on and utilize a base map reflecting current site conditions, including topographic survey and existing facilities furnished by the City or others in an AutoCAD drawing file/format. BHC's work scope and budget does not include surveying and related services that may be required for the project. Surveying, mapping and related services required to support BHC's engineering/design of project improvements will need to include, but are not necessarily limited to, survey information for site topography, rights of way, easements, locations of existing utilities and other structures, facilities or features that may influence design. Specifically, P. 1 of 3 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 190 3.6.a locations of existing surface features, subsurface and aerial utilities (water, sewer, storm drain, gas, power, TV, phone and/or fiber optic) must be identified and mapped. 6. Utilities that may potentially impact or be affected by the project include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: City of Edmonds — water, sewer, stormwater, ComCast Cable, Frontier Communications NW — phone/fiber optic/TV; Snohomish County PUD #1, Puget Sound Energy — power; and Puget Sound Energy - natural gas. It is assumed that the information furnished by the City, the City's surveyor, and others regarding the location, etc. of the various existing utilities can be relied upon for the purposes of design of the project. Existing utilities that may be in conflict or require adjustment during the construction of this project will be identified from the information provided. Potholing information (to be furnished by the City or others) may also be required for design of the project. Potholing to verify location and elevation of existing utilities is not included as part of this scope of work and if necessary will require additional budget. All coordination required for relocating existing utilities (outside the scope of this project), if required, will be done by the City. 7. Coordination with franchise utilities (e.g. power, natural gas, phone/fiber optic/tv, etc.), and other agencies including possibly for relocating existing utilities, except as otherwise specifically stated, is not part of the current work scope and if needed will require additional budget. 8. All project work is anticipated to occur and be located within existing public right-of-way or existing City property or easement(s). No new temporary and/or permanent easements will be obtained. Individual property research and title reports to determine/verify existing public right(s)-of-way or easements are not part of the work scope. Easement negotiations, acquisition, and recordings are not part of the work scope and if needed will require additional budget. If necessary, the City will be responsible for all efforts associated with temporary/permanent easements required for the project. Right(s)-of-Entry, if required, will be obtained by the City as necessary for BHC's and subconsultant's use/work for the project. 9. BHC's work will be based on available environmental documentation and/or permitting (if any) furnished by the City, or others related to the project. BHC's work scope and budget does not include time for the preparation of permit applications or other environmental, etc. review and/or documentation for the project, or other related permitting services and/or assistance, except as otherwise specifically identified. Based on discussions with City staff, unless otherwise specifically stated, it is our understanding that a Cultural Resources Assessment and CWA Section 402 (NPDES) construction stormwater permit are not anticipated and specifically assumed to not be required for this project. We understand it to be the City's intention to be responsible for any and all environmental documentation, permit application(s), and/or associated fees required for the project. 10. Drawings will be prepared in accordance with City Drafting Standards. The plans will be 22"x 34" drawings with a standard signature block. Drawings will be prepared using AutoCAD 2014/Civil 3D. From the full size drawings, half -sized drawings will be produced for review copies. 11. An electronic copy (word, excel, dwg and pdf files) for each design submittal will be provided to the City as desired for review. It is requested that the City provide one set of written comments for all preliminary submittals. All review comments from the City will be addressed and incorporated in the revised/final documents. 12. The final submittal shall include technical documents, signed and stamped by the design engineer responsible for their preparation, and ready for the City staff approval P. 2 of 3 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 191 3.6.a signatures (if applicable). An electronic copy on a CD (specifications — pdf & word files; and plans — pdf & CAD files) will be provided to the City for the City's posting to Builders' Exchange. 13. In preparing the scope of services defined herein, we have attempted to identify all tasks and work that are considered necessary or essential to the work/project as desired by the City at this time. Services not specifically identified in our Scope of Services are not included in our scope and are not being provided. Should other services and/or additional time be necessary or desired by the City for the project, additional budget may be required. P. 3 of 3 City of Edmonds Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Consultant Services March 14, 2016 Packet Pg. 192 3.6.a 1W14:11419:3 CITY OF EDMONDS DAYTON STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT (3RD Ave to 9` Ave) CONSULTANT SERVICES FEE March 14, 2016 Based on the attached hour effort estimate and related expenses, we estimate our fee for the proposed effort to be $496,800 which includes $151,048 for subconsultant(s) and $6,191 for related reimbursable expenses (communications, mileage, reproductions, etc.). This fee includes a $30,000 management reserve budget for covering potential additional unanticipated efforts/costs. With the City's concurrence and approval, we anticipate the execution of a standard time and expense agreement with a not to exceed amount for the proposed services. Specific billing rates for the primary individuals anticipated to be involved with the project are shown on Exhibit B-1. Attachment(s): • Exhibit B-1 — Consultant Fee Determination Packet Pg. 193 3.6.a r Q Packet Pg. 194 City of Edmonds 3.6.a Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Consultant Services Exhibit B-1 Consultant Fee Determination (3/14116) BHC Consultants, LLC Task Task Description Principal Eng PM/Sr. Engineer Project Engineer Staff Engineer CAD/GIS/Graphics Admin./Clerical Total $230.00 $200.00 $135.00 $100.00 $100.00 $85.00 Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost 1 Project Development 0 0 8 1,600 8 1,080 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 $2,680 2 Information Research, Collection and Review/Kick-Off Meeting 0 0 12 2,400 20 2,700 0 0 16 1,600 0 0 48 $6,700 3 Conceptual Design and Alternatives Analysis 2 460 24 4,800 56 7,560 6 600 32 3,200 2 170 122 $16,790 4 ADA Assessment 0 0 4 800 12 1,620 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 $2,420 5 Preliminary Engineering and Design (30%) 2 460 28 5,600 120 16,200 12 1,200 144 14,400 0 0 306 $37,860 6 Geotechnical Investigation/Engineering Services 0 0 4 800 12 1,620 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 $2,420 7 Stormwater Compliance Report 0 0 1 200 4 540 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 $740 8 Cultural Resources Assessment 0 0 1 200 4 540 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 $740 9 Fanchise Utilities and WSDOT Coordination 0 0 4 800 16 2,160 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 $2,960 10 Public Information and Outreach 0 0 12 2,400 48 6,480 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 $8,880 11 Final Design and Prep. Of Bid Documents 4 920 148 29,600 480 64,800 120 12,000 480 48,000 28 2,380 1260 $157,700 12 Assisance During Bid Period (Limited) 0 0 2 400 12 1,620 6 600 0 0 0 0 20 $2,620 13 Support During Construction (Limited) 0 0 8 1,600 40 5,400 16 1,600 0 0 0 0 64 $8,600 14 Communication/Coordination/Meeting(s) 0 0 60 12,000 100 13,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 $25,500 15 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 28 6,440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 $6,440 16 Project Management 4 920 80 16,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 3,570 126 $20,490 17 Record Drawings 0 0 1 2 400 1 12 1,620 16 1,600 1 24 2,400 0 0 54 $6,020 Labor 40 $9,200 1 398 $79,600 1 944 $127,440 176 $17,600 1 696 $69,600 72 6,120 2326 $309,560 Reimbursable Expenses: Other Direct Expenses -- mileage, reproductions, printing, delivery charges, telecommunications, postage, outsides services, special fees, etc. (2% of project labor) Subconsultant(s): KPG (Transportation Engineering Services) Landau & Assoc. (Geotechnical Investigation/Engineering Services) Anchor/QEA (Archaeological Services) includes BHC 10% mark up Total Labor $309,560 $ 6,191 Reimbursables $ 6,191 BHC Subtotal $315,751 $ 113,739 r $ 34,315 C $ 2,995 d d Subconsultant(s) Subtotal $ 151,048 0) L Management Reserve $ 30,000 t TOTAL FEE $ 496,800 C) ■ T C E L U R r r Q Packet Pg. 195 3.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Murray, Smith & Associates for Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Staff Lead/Author: Megan Luttrell Department: Engineering Initiated By: The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in March 2015 to hire a consultant to provide design engineering services for the Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project. The City received statements of qualifications from two engineering firms and the selection committee chose Murray Smith & Associates (MSA) to provide design engineering services for the Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project. On August 3, 2015 the City entered into a $71,019 contract with MSA to provide evaluations and recommendations for the Five Corners Reservoir. Although the main purpose of the project was to recoat the two reservoirs, a preliminary study consisting of a comprehensive evaluation of the facility was included in the scope. A structural analysis was performed using available as -built records and seismic codes updated since the City's 2004 structural evaluation. The results of the analysis have led to concerns about the structural integrity of the two reservoirs. The City proposes a Supplemental Agreement with MSA to further investigate the structural issues identified in the preliminary study. The supplement includes a geotechnical investigation to obtain information on soil bearing capacity and ultrasonic testing on reservoir tank welds to obtain information on reservoir shell strength that will replace engineering assumptions previously used in the structural analysis. MSA will also evaluate operational constraints to determine if reductions in storage volumes could reduce the impact from a seismic event. The proposed fee for the supplement is $60,465. The supplemental services are scheduled to be completed by mid-2016 with the delivery of the Final Technical Memorandum. Completion of the remaining tasks in the 2015 Professional Services Agreement will be predicated upon recommendations from the Final Technical Memorandum. The total fee for the Professional Services Agreement and proposed supplement is $131,484, including a management reserve of $16,000 for any unexpected tasks that may come up during design. On March 22, 2015, staff presented this item to Council it was forwarded to the future consent agenda for approval. Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement. Attachments: Murray, Smith & Associates - Supplemental Agreement Vicinity Map Packet Pg. 196 3.7.a Original Contract No. Supplemental Agreement 1 No. CITY OF EDMONDS DAVE EARLING 121 5" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 . 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-672-5750 MAYOR Website: www.edmondswa.gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", entered into an underlying agreement for design, engineering and consulting services with respect to a project known as Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project, dated August 3, 2015; and WHEREAS, two additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified with regard to ])field testing and structural evaluations; and 2) storage volume and operating level evaluation; NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of August 3, 2015 between the parties, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement shall be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $71,019 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $60,465 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not -to -exceed amount of $131,484 ($71,019 plus $60,465). 1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying agreement consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B to this addendum, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Packet Pg. 197 3.7.a 2. In all other respects, the underlying agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein. DONE this day of , 20 CITY OF EDMONDS MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Bv: Mayor David O. Earling ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney By: _ Title: Packet Pg. 198 3.7.a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Pg. 199 3.7.a EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF EDMONDS FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR RECOATING PROJECT PHASE 1 - RESERVOIR EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES NO. 1 BACKGROUND Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. (MSA) has developed the following scope of services and accompanying engineering fee estimate to provide supplemental engineering services for the Five Corners Reservoir Recoating project. The scope and fee have been developed based on coordination with City staff during a meeting on January 26, 2016, which involved the review and discussion of the results of the structural evaluation and coating assessment work completed by MSA and subconsultants under the original scope of services for this project. The results of the structural evaluation work by MSA's subconsultant, Peterson Structural Engineers, indicated that both reservoirs do not meet current seismic design requirements, primarily due to several AWWA and building code changes that have occurred since the reservoirs were originally constructed in 1960 for the 1.5 MG reservoir and 1979 for the 3.0 MG reservoir. Due to the limited amount of information available from the original construction of the facilities, assumptions had to be made for some values used in the structural evaluation calculations. SCOPE OF WORK The primary focus of this supplemental scope of services is to conduct field tests and provide confirmed data instead of assumptions for the structural calculations, which will enable the City and MSA to better define improvements for the two reservoirs. This scope also includes tasks to evaluate the possibility of operating the reservoirs at lower levels, in comparison with the required volume of storage that is currently being determined as part of the City's water system plan update project. The final tasks for this scope include prioritizing proposed improvements, developing cost estimates, meeting with the City, and a technical memorandum that documents the work completed with recommendations for the next steps of the project. The proposed approach for the supplemental work program is to complete the tasks identified in this scope of services and determine if additional field testing is warranted to provide sufficient data to make a final determination of improvements for the reservoirs. If the results of this scope of services indicate that additional field testing is warranted, the additional field testing work may include removal of reservoir shell plate coupons and weld seam coupons for steel strength analysis. Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination r This task provides for management of the project and coordination with the project team as it relates to the supplemental work contained herein. Elements of this task will include: z a City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Supplement 1 - Five C March 8, 2016 Engineers/Planners Packet Pg. 200 3.7.a 1.1 Correspondence and Coordination with City - Coordinate with the City Project Manager via phone conversations and e-mail for project decisions, project status, work activities, and issues requiring City input. 1.2 Budget Review, Invoices and Progress Reports - MSA's Project Manager will monitor project costs and manage budget and billing tasks, including preparation and submission of monthly invoices and progress reports. 1.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) - Perform in-house quality assurance reviews of all deliverables. MSA Deliverables to City: • Correspondence, a -mails and other documentation • Monthly billing statements and activity reports Task 2 — Field Testing and Structural Evaluations This task involves non-destructive field tests with both reservoirs in service to gather information on site soils and to examine the welds on all courses of the shell of both reservoirs to provide data for use in additional structural calculations to better define potential improvements for the facilities. 2.1 Geotechnical investigation - MSA subconsultant HWA Geo Sciences (HWA) will perform a geotechnical investigation of the site, including a single boring, and report the allowable bearing capacity of the soils in addition to other data. A more detailed description of the services to be provided follows. a. Review available geotechnical information, including geologic maps, online geotechnical databases, and HWA's project library. b. Coordinate field site visit and field exploration locations with City and MSA. c. Conduct field explorations that includes one (1) boring using a truck -mounted drill rig to a depth of approximately 30 to 40 feet. d. Using soil samples from the boring, conduct laboratory tests to determine engineering properties and present results in a summary log. e. Perform geotechnical engineering analysis to develop foundation bearing capacity recommendations for the existing reservoirs. f. Perform geotechnical engineering analysis to develop near surface lateral earth pressure recommendations, including estimate of available coefficient of friction along base of reservoirs. g. Prepare draft report of findings and recommendations and finalize report upon receipt of review comments. h. Project management tasks related to preparing monthly invoice and progress reports, including coordination with MSA. 2.2 Weld Testing - MSA subconsultant Mayes Testing Engineers (Mayes) will examine the welds on all courses of the shell of both reservoirs. A more detailed description of the services to be provided follows for each reservoir. a. Perform visual examination of existing accessible welds, including shell welds and a external appurtenances. City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Supplement 1 - Five C March 8, 2016 Engineers/Planners Packet Pg. 201 3.7.a b. Perform spot ultrasonic testing of horizontal and vertical shell butt welds. c. Provide a written report of findings. 2.3 Structural and Seismic Assessment - MSA subconsultant Peterson Structural Engineers (Peterson) will conduct an updated structural analysis of the existing reservoirs with data provided by HWA and Mayes, and provide recommended improvements and estimated construction costs. A more detailed description of the services to be provided follows. a. Review of provided test data for completeness/accuracy. b. Teleconferences/meeting with the project team members and City of Edmonds c. Peterson shall perform an updated structural review/analysis of existing reservoirs with data provided by the consultants with multiple analysis iterations in order review preliminary results in order to determine if additional testing is required or warranted. d. Evaluate exiting roof system for slosh effects based on the MSA proposed reservoir operating levels. e. Develop upgrade recommendations and possible configurations based on updated analysis. f. Generation of a revised conditions and recommendations report outlining our findings and options for upgrades with associated cost opinions, stamped by a Washington licensed PE. g. Provide revised and updated structural calculations conforming to the proposed upgrades, stamped by a Washington licensed PE. Assumptions: • Site access to be provided to Mayes, HWA and their subcontractors. • Any required permits will be provided at no cost to HWA. • The HWA scope of work does not include identification nor evaluation of contaminants that may be present in the soil or ground water. City Responsibilities: • Provide access to reservoirs and attend field reconnaissance with project team. • Procure and pay for any required permits. MSA Deliverables: • Electronic copy (PDF) via e-mail of reports from HWA, Mayes and Peterson. Task 3 — Storage Volume and Operating Level Evaluation 3.1 Storage Volume Requirements — In coordination with work underway for the City's water system plan update project, review the updated storage requirements for the two Five Corner Reservoirs and identify operating storage requirements to meet the 20-year planning period. 3.2 Operating Level Evaluation — Review historical data and identify past operating level ranges;; coordinate with City Operations staff on storage requirements as it relates to operations; and evaluate operating level constraints in conjunction with updated storage volume requirements z to determine potential reductions in operating levels to increase freeboard and potential impacts from slosh during seismic events. a City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Supplement 1 - Five C March 8, 2016 Engineers/Planners Packet Pg. 202 3.7.a City Responsibilities: • Participate in discussions with MSA and provide input on operating levels. Task 4 — Proposed Improvements, Cost Estimates and Workshop 4.1 Proposed Improvements — Develop prioritized list of recommended improvements for the reservoirs based on the results of the prior tasks. 4.2 Cost Estimates - Prepare planning level construction cost estimates for the recommended improvements for City budgeting and scheduling purposes. If warranted due to extensive rehabilitation improvements, conduct a life -cycle cost estimate of potential alternatives related to reservoir rehabilitation vs. replacement options. 4.3 Workshop with City - Meet with City staff to review the results of the prior tasks, gather feedback, and collaborate on improvements. City Responsibilities: • Participate in workshop with MSA and provide feedback on work completed. MSA Deliverables: Workshop agenda and meeting materials. Workshop meeting minutes. Task 5 — Technical Memorandum 5.1 Draft Technical Memorandum -Prepare a draft technical memorandum that summarizes the work in prior tasks, recommendations and next steps for the project; submit draft technical memorandum to the City for review and comment. 5.2 Final Technical Memorandum -The draft technical memorandum will be revised based on comments from City, and finalized for distribution to the City. City Responsibilities: • Review draft technical memorandum and provide comments. MSA Deliverables: Electronic copy (MS Word) of Draft Technical Memorandum via e-mail. One (1) hard copy and 1 electronic copy (PDF) of the Final Technical Memorandum. Task 6 — Unanticipated Task Reserve (As Needed) A reserve budget amount has been included in the fee estimate for work that may include additional unanticipated labor or expenses not specifically identified in the scope of work tasks defined above. Such work items will be undertaken only after written authorization from the City. ESTIMATED SCHEDULE The estimated schedule for the supplemental tasks identified herein is approximately one month to a complete the field work and develop reports for MSA's three subconsultants and an additional two z to four weeks to complete the remaining tasks, depending on the timing of the workshop and factors beyond MSA's control that may result in the schedule being extended. a City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Supplement 1 - Five C March 8, 2016 Engineers/Planners Packet Pg. 203 3.7.a EXHIBIT B FEE ESTIMATE CITY OF EDMONDS FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR RECOATING PROJECT PHASE 1 - RESERVOIR EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES NO. 1 3/8/2016 1111LIE., ESTIMATED FEES rincipal ineer lVEngineerI 213 Principal $190 Professional Engineer lX $183 Administrativ el $80 Hours abor Subconsultants Expenses Total HWA Mayes Peterson Task i - Project Management & Coordination Task 1.1- Correspondence and Coordination with City 3 3 $ 639 $ 10 $ 649 Task 1.2 - Budget Review, Invoices, Progress Reports 1 1 2 $ 293 $ 10 $ 303 Task 1.3 - Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) 2 2 $ 426 $ $ 426 Task 1 Subtotal 6 0 0 1 7 $ 1,358 $ $ - $ - $ 20 $ 1,378 Task 2 - Field Testing & Structural Evaluation Task 2.1- Geotechnical Investigation 1 2 3 $ 579 $ 11,545 $ 10 $ 12,134 Task 2.2 - Weld Testing 1 2 1 3 $ 579 $ 13,497 $ 10 $ 14,086 Task 2.3 - Structural and Seismic Assessment 1 1 1 2 4 $ 769 $ 9,713 $ 10 $ 10,492 Task 2 Subtotal 3 1 6 0 10 $ 1,927 $11,545 $ 13,497 $ 9,713 $ 30 $ 36,712 Task 3 - Storage Volume & Operating Level Evaluation Task 3.1- Storage Volume Requirements 2 2 4 $ 792 $ $ 792 Task 3.2 - Operating Level Evaluation 3 6 9 $ 1,737 $ $ 1,737 Task 3 Subtotal 5 0 8 0 13 $ 2,529 $ $ $ $ - $ 2,529 Task 4 - Proposed Improvements, Cost Estimates & Workshop Task 4.1- Proposed Improvements 2 1 8 11 $ 2,080 $ 10 $ 2,090 Task 4.2 - Cost Estimates 1 1 8 10 $ 1,867 $ 10 $ 1,877 Task 4.3 - Workshop with City 4 4 8 $ 1,612 $ 40 $ 1,652 Task 4 Subtotal 7 6 16 0 29 $ 5,559 $ $ $ $ 60 $ 5,619 Task 5 - Technical Memorandum Task 5.1- Draft Technical Memorandum 2 1 14 2 19 $ 3,338 $ 20 $ 3,358 Task 5.2- Final Technical Memorandum 1 1 2 1 5 $ 849 $ 20 $ 869 Task 5 Subtotal 3 2 16 3 24 $ 4,187 $ $ $ $ 40 $ 4,227 Task 6 - Unanticipated Task Reserve (As Needed) Task 6 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 $ 10,000 $ $ $ $ - $ 10,000 TOTAL - ALL TASKS 24 9 46 4 83 $ 25,560 $ 11,545 $13,497 $ 9,713 $ 150 $ 60,465 City of Edmonds Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. Phase 1 - Five Corners Reservoirs Engineers/Planners Packet Pg. 204 3.7.a EXHIBIT C BILLING RATES Personnel: Labor will be invoiced by staff classification at the following hourly rates. Principal Engineer VI $220.00 - 233.00 Principal Engineer V 212.00 - 225.00 Principal Engineer IV 206.00 - 218.00 Principal Engineer III 198.00 - 210.00 Principal Engineer II 191.00 - 202.00 Principal Engineer I 184.00 - 195.00 Professional Engineer IX 177.00 - 188.00 Professional Engineer VIII 169.00 - 179.00 Professional Engineer VII 161.00 - 171.00 Professional Engineer VI 152.00 - 161.00 Professional Engineer V 144.00 - 153.00 Professional Engineer IV 135.00 - 143.00 Engineering Designer IV 135.00 - 143.00 Professional Engineer III 127.00 - 135.00 Engineering Designer I1I 127.00 - 135.00 Engineering Designer II 119.00 - 126.00 Engineering Designer I 110.00 - 117.00 Technician IV 127.00 - 135.00 Technician III 115.00 - 122.00 Technician II 102.00 - 108.00 Technician I 88.00 - 93.00 Administrative I11 95.00 - 101.00 Administrative II 87.00 - 92.00 Administrative I 77.00 - 82.00 Project Expenses: Expenses incurred in-house that are directly attributable to the project will be invoiced at actual cost. These expenses include the following: CADD Hardware/Software $18.00/hour Modeling and GIS Hardware/Software $10.00/hour Mileage Current IRS Rate Postage and Delivery Services At Cost Printing and Reproduction At Cost Travel, Lodging and Subsistence At Cost Outside Services: Outside technical, professional and other services will be invoiced at actual cost plus 10 percent to cover administration and overhead. MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers/Planners Packet Pg. 205 City of Edmonds Vicinity Map I a O,Nv1+r,:V {'' r- w cc 3.7.b Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project i � �}1tiFitil ws► m a 3 19 TH S f Swr I? i 4 2041 ,P 1ifiil-"i'V.a $ M 13l.1F+5T5W a Z44TH STSW �•�.,, 5m Packet Pg. 206 3.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Authorization to award a construction contract for the Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Project to Insituform Technologies Staff Lead/Author: Megan Luttrell Department: Engineering Initiated By: The project involves rehabilitation of several sewer segments throughout the City by cured -in -place pipe lining method of specified sewer segments throughout the City. The work area includes 21 sewer segments totaling approximately 6,461 feet of 8" and 15" gravity sewer main. On March 22, 2016, the City received two bids for the project. The bids ranged from a low of $1,029,965.72 to a high of $1,624,699.62. The bid and funding summary is attached. Insituform Technologies submitted an apparent low bid in the amount of $1,029,965.72. The engineer's estimate was $985,762.44. A review of the low bidder's record for responsibility and responsiveness is complete. Construction will occur between May and October of 2016. On March 22, 2016, staff presented this item to Council it was forwarded to the consent agenda at a future meeting for approval. Staff recommends Council award the contract to Insituform Technologies in the amount of $1,029,965.72 and authorize a management reserve of $103,000 for changes and unforeseen conditions. Attachments: CIPP Sewer Vicinity Map Bid Summary Packet Pg. 207 City of Edmonds Vicinity Map I a nc. 189 Citywide CI PP Sewer Rehabilitation Project CIPP Locations: 1. Sunset Avenue between Bell and Main Streets. 2. Alley between 2nd and 3rd Avenues from Main to Bell. 3. Alley between Sunset and 2nd Avenues from Bell to Edmonds. 4. Railroad Avenue from Main St southwards —200 ft. 5. Alley between 3rd and 4t" Avenues between Main and Dayton. 6. Alley between Dayton and Main from 6t" Avenue eastwards—500ft. 7. Intersection of 3rd Ave and Walnut Street. 8 7t" Avenue from Daley Street to —500 north of Glen St. 9. From intersection of Pine and 6t" Avenues southward through Pine Street Park. 10.Olympic Ave between Sprague and Edmonds St. 11.5t" Avenue from Forsyth Ln northwards —500 ft. 12.97t" Avenue from 219t" St westwards —500 ft. 13.96t" Avenue between Walnut and Spruce St. 14. Bowdoin Way from roundabout southwestwards —350 ft. 15. Hwy 99 from 216t" St to 2201" St. i#-A MPwVA* I z H►MEkq) x r _ S c S 196TH 5-F sw teh1H51'ti1ile ! 89TH 51 S►r, -nf ST-.W r'041 tt %r •,w 14-?I iTH i f vloe, r Q%5 Wok 15 } d J&1n 5 1 Z44TI+ ST 3.8.a a MOW Sib Packet Pg. 208 3.8.b City of Edmonds Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Bid Summary 22-Mar-16 Construction Estimate & Bids Engineer's Estimate I Insituform I Michels Corp. 1 3 4 5 $ 985,762.44 $ 1,029,965.72 $ 1,624,699.62 $ - $ - $ - Construction Funds Required Construction Contract $ 1,029,966 Contingency (10%) $ 102,997 Staff $ 30,000 Professional Services $ 19,300 Total Construction $ 1,182,262 6 7 8 9 $ - $ - $ - $ - r%vdiiduit: runuin Sewer Fund 423 $ 1,006,263 Transfer from unspent 2015 Fund 423 $ 41,000 Transfer from unspent 2015 Sewer Project Funds $ 75,000 Transfer from 2016 Sewer Project $ 60,000 Total Available Funds $ 1,182,263 Packet Pg. 209 3.9 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Authorization to award a construction contract for the 191st Street SW and 216th St. Drainage Improvements Project to AGR Contracting Staff Lead/Author: Megan Luttrell Department: Engineering Initiated By: This project involves 1) the installation of a bioswale to accept surface water from the street at the intersection of 191 St SW and Dellwood Drive, and 2) The installation of an under -road detention system on 216th St SW between 96th and 92nd Avenues to address runoff that overtaxes an existing City storm line that runs through several private properties. The project includes replacement of stormwater related infrastructure (e.g., stormwater piping, catch basins, manholes), and decommissioning of existing infrastructure, as appropriate. On March 15, 2016, the City received eleven bids for the project. The bids ranged from a low of $144,289.50 to a high of $228,380.00. The bid and funding summary is attached as Exhibit 1, a vicinity map is attached as Exhibit 2. AGR Contracting submitted an apparent low bid in the amount of $144,289.50. The engineer's estimate was $198,000. A review of the low bidder's record for responsibility and responsiveness has been completed. On March 22, 2016, staff presented this item to Council and it was forwarded to the consent agenda at a future meeting. Staff recommends Council award the contract to AGR Contracting in the amount of $144,289.50 and authorize a management reserve of $21,600 for changes and unforeseen conditions. Attachments: Bid Tab.191st&216th Vicinity Map.191st&216th Packet Pg. 210 3.9.a City of Edmonds 2015 Storm at 191 st St SW and 216th St SW Bid Summary 15-Mar-16 Construction Estimate & Bids Engineer's Estimate I AGR Contracting I RRJ Const, LLC I D&G Backhoe I Kamins Const I Sierra Pacific $ 198,080.33 1 $ 144,289.50 1 $ 146,817.00 1 $ 161,170.00 1 $ 168,558.52 1 $ 172,424.00 Trimax Const I NPM Const Rodarte Const Laser Underground I Thomco Const I Westwater $ 174,204.00 1 $ 189,584.60 $ 198,479.00 $ 205,045.00 1 $ 210,010.00 1 $ 228,380.00 construction runas Kequirea Construction Contract $ 144,290 Contingency (15%) $ 21,643 Staff $ 6,000 Professional Services $ 30,172 Total Construction $ 202,105 Avaiiame runaing Annual Storm c466 $ 140,000 Perrinville Bioswale c434 $ 138,858 Total Funds Available $ 278,858 Packet Pg. 211 3.9.b 2015 Drainage Improvements at 191st St SW and 216th St SW .eo �_j. � � � •;w iii��� 1915t Street SW FMM i -1& It ■ �7\ W {:W)DWAY r LYNNWOOD .�V�l y R O � 3 PON 6n LU F--�, - 168TF 1F6T 1�i11 W W 2 1 HTH ST SW w 196TN 5 T SVV 200T 20 4' 20 $TH ST 36 11 2TH ST SVY W i f „ R ~ r W Ln m i �f •.. .r.., . 216t" Street SW Vicinity to N N CD Q. cc c C 0 a Ed Packet Pg. 212 3.10 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Budget Authorization for Federal Lobbyist/Strategist Services Staff Lead/Author: Scott Passey Department: Community Services Initiated By: Background/History This item was presented to the City Council on March 22, 2016. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Council approve $42,000 in General Fund appropriation for a federal lobbyist contract on the Consent Agenda. Narrative The currently on -going Waterfront At -Grade Rail Crossings Alternatives Analysis is well under way, with the guidance and oversight of the Mayor's Advisory Task Force and key City staff. It is anticipated that the Advisory Task Force will recommend (a) preferred alternative(s) from that process by early Fall. At that time the Mayor will be in a position to recommend a preferred alternative to City Council for their approval as the City's selected alternative - likely by year's end. Consequently, by early 2017, once a preferred alternative has been selected, a resulting project will be ready to enter the design and environmental phase. This phase will require additional funds. As a result, it is becoming increasingly necessary to seek federal funding sources to match any local, regional and/or state funds to support this next phase. Likewise, other transportation projects, such as improvements to Highway 99 or SR 104 may also, may also need federal funds in addition to local, regional and state funding. In order to be effective in these pursuits, it is prudent to engage the services of federal lobbyists/strategists based in Washington, D.C., who can provide daily or weekly, in -person contact with officials in the various transportation agencies, as well as elected officials and their staff. In addition, these consultants know the ins and outs of existing and even emerging grant or appropriations opportunities to prepare us both in advance of, and during, application processes. For these reasons, the Mayor's Office proposes that the City engage the services of Capitol Strategies Partners of Washington, D.C., for the remainder of this year in an amount not to exceed $42,000 ($4,000 for April, May and June; $5,000 for July through December). This appropriation would come from the 2015 positive ending General Fund cash balance of approximately $1.7 million. Attached is a detailed outline of Capitol Strategies' scope of services for this year. Attachments: CAPITOL STRATEGIES SCOPE OF SERVICES Packet Pg. 213 3.10.a CAPITOL STRATEGIES SCOPE OF SERVICES The contractor will assist the City in the pursuit of near -term and long-term funding for the at - grade crossings alternatives project and other Edmonds transportation projects through several potential sources: Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Proiects Program (FASTLANE): This program was enacted into law in December as part of the surface transportation reauthorization, the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) has dubbed the program the Fostering Advancements in Shipping and Transportation for the Long -Term Achievement of National Efficiencies (FASTLANE) Grant Program, The FAST Act provides $800 million in FFY 2016 for FASTLANE grants, which are supposed to assist projects of "national or regional significance". The waterfront access project meets several of the program's statutory goals, including its first one, to "improve the safety, efficiency, and reliability of the movement of freight and people". The project would also "reduce highway congestion and bottlenecks" and "improve connectivity between modes of freight transportation". USDOT's Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the first round of FASTLANE grants adds additional goals that appear to have been borrowed without attribution from USDOT's well-worn Ladders of Opportunity program. The NOFO says the "Department will prioritize projects that also enhance personal mobility and accessibility", for example, projects that "better connect people to essential services ... remove physical barriers to access" and "mitigate the negative impacts of freight movement on communities". The waterfront access project clearly addresses these goals. In its discussion of project benefits it would like to see and measure, USDOT starts by citing "time savings for passenger travel and freight shipments" and "improvements in transportation safety". It later adds "improving the reliability of passenger travel times or freight deliveries, reducing recurring delays at critical transportation bottlenecks" and "increased access and mobility". Once again, the waterfront access project fits very well with what USDOT wants from the FASTLANE program. These goals and desired benefits reinforces the fact that the FASTLANE program is not just designed to expedite freight movement. It is also meant to separate freight movement from other traffic. The fact that grade separation projects are specifically made eligible for the much larger pot of highway freight projects (vs. the small multimodal projects pot) also demonstrates this intent. Members of Congress and USDOT officials are well aware of the problems caused around the country by increased train traffic. Because the at -grade crossing alternatives project is in the development phase, it will face some (hopefully surmountable) challenges: Packet Pg. 214 3.10.a 1) The statute says that selected projects should be "reasonably expected to begin construction not later than 18 months after the date of obligation of funds for the project". The NOFO says USDOT will interpret that to mean that construction must be reasonably expected to begin by September 30, 2019. 2) The NOFO says that USDOT will want to see a "project schedule that identifies all major project milestones" including "programming on the STIP", "completion of NEPA and other environmental reviews and approvals including permitting, design completion" and "right of way acquisition". They will want that project schedule to demonstrate that construction can begin by September 30, 2019. However, this program is clearly not intended only for "shovel -ready" projects. The NOFO says that "eligible costs ... include development phase activities including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other pre -construction activities". It also says that "depending on the nature of pre - construction activities included in the award project, the Department may obligate funds in phases". They clearly envision supporting projects from the development phase through construction. The April 14 deadline for application submission presents a serious challenge. On the other hand, this is a brand-new program with a lot of uncertainty around it. Many potential applicants may shy away from applying (USDOT staff predict this) and nobody has an application from last year to dust off and re -submit. If you decide to pursue this grant, here are some specific ways we would assist you: 1) We would collect the best and most current intelligence possible, especially from key USDOT staff, about what the grant application should contain and what themes it should emphasize to get USDOT's attention. 2) We will help you write your grant application (and/or review drafts), especially to ensure that it addresses the goals, criteria and requirements of the statute and the NOFO. 3) If you encounter difficulty crafting some portions of the grant application, we will help find expert assistance to answer your questions. 4) We will draft letters of support from Members of the Washington State Congressional delegation and stakeholders and work with each of them to produce and send those letters after the grant application has been submitted. One of those stakeholders would be our client, the Washington State Department of Transportation and especially Washington State Ferries. 5) We will continue to access publicly -available information about this FASTLANE grant round via USDOT webinars, fact sheets, FAQs, etc., but we will especially utilize our contacts at USDOT to secure critical, informal, unwritten advice from the staff who are running this grant program. 6) As the grants are being reviewed, WSDOT staff might have questions or need additional information about the project. We would work with you to provide the best possible responses to those inquiries. Packet Pg. 215 3.10.a 7) If the grant application is successful, we will work closely with you to advance the project so the grant funds can be released. 8) If the grant application is unsuccessful, we will organize a debrief with USDOT Headquarters staff to determine how our application could have been stronger and begin working with you on an improved grant application for the next round of FASTLANE grants. Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program: The RRIF program comes from a very different pedigree than the FASTLANE program. Unlike FASTLANE, RRIF is an old program, first enacted into law in 1998. It is a single -mode program for both passenger and freight rail projects, rather than a multimodal program with a freight focus. It is a rolling loan program, as opposed to an annual grant program with deadlines. It languished for several years with many complaints about its burdensome requirements and procedures. In recent years, USDOT has worked to make RRIF more customer -friendly. It has issued 12 loans worth $2 billion since 2009. USDOT staff are currently working on bringing RRIF, the TIFIA program, the FASTLANE grant program and other grant and loan programs under the rubric of the new National Surface Transportation and Innovative Finance Bureau. USDOT gives priority to rail projects that provide public benefits, including benefits to public safety in providing RRIF loans. Local governments are eligible applicants. Eligible projects include those to "acquire, improve or rehabilitate intermodal or rail equipment or facilities, including track, track components, [and] bridges" and to "develop or establish new intermodal or railroad facilities". RRIF loans can fund up to 100% of eligible project costs at an interest rate equal to the rate on Treasury securities of a similar term. The maximum repayment period is 35 years and applicants can request to defer repayment for up to six years. It would be hard to find more generous loan terms. We are also very familiar with USDOT staff who work on the RRIF loan program. As with the FASTLANE program, we would secure the best possible intelligence about what we should include in a RRIF loan application and help you draft appropriate language in the loan application. We would also draft and secure letters of support for Members of Congress and stakeholders for your application. Because RRIF is a rolling loan program, it doesn't have the time urgency of the FASTLANE program. We propose to focus our efforts first on the FASTLANE grant application and then turn our attention to RRIF. The RRIF loan application process usually begins with an information session at USDOT and then the development of a draft loan application with technical assistance provided by staff for the Federal Railroad Administration. We would then organize a draft application review meeting at USDOT and would work with you to develop your final application. That final application will need to show how Edmonds intends to spend and repay RRIF funds, provide documentation Packet Pg. 216 3.10.a of Edmond's financial health, and environmental and engineering documentation for the project. As the application process proceeds to approval, USDOT may have questions or need additional information. We would work closely with you to respond to those requests. Other Funding Programs There are other federal funding programs that we should also consider for the waterfront at -grade rail crossings alternatives project. Regarding the TIGER program, we recommend waiting until next year for because of its strict "project readiness" requirements. We would, however, start the education process with the delegation and with key USDOT decision makers so when the City of Edmonds does submit a TIGER application next year, it will be moved up the priority list. On another front, we would be pleased to assist you with efforts to secure funding through the Washington State Legislature under the new federal freight formula program and via PSRC from the federal Surface Transportation Program. We know both programs very well. We are also aware of many potential funding sources for various phases of a potential project: Near -term, early -stage phase(s): As we mentioned, design, environmental and early -development -phase earlier, activities are an eligible expenditure under the FASTLANE program. Project stakeholders like the BNSF Railroad and the State of Washington have contributed funds for the Alternatives Analysis phase of this project. They should be willing to consider additional funding for the next phases of activity. The PSRC has awarded planning funds to area communities under several funding programs. Long-term funding options: Many communities utilize "value capture" for development activities through tax - increment financing, special assessments, business improvement districts, and land value taxes. PSRC recently issued a report on possible value capture approaches in Washington State. Businesses west of the railroad tracks will increase in value as a result of this project. USDOT recently announced procedures for allowing states to redistribute almost $2 billion in highway funding from "dead earmarks" made by Congresses years ago. States have until September 30 to apply these funds to projects within 50 miles of the original project location. Washington State DOT has $18.3 million in dead earmarks to redistribute, including $363,405 for an off -ramp from I-5 to the intersection of Alderwood Mall Boulevard and Alderwood Mall Parkway, well within 50 miles of Edmonds. Packet Pg. 217 3.10.a • USDOT has assisted development activities for transit -oriented development projects through technical assistance and a pilot program. This project will improve access to the ferry terminal. Will it also benefit access to the train station and improve bus service? We can work with you to pursue multiple options for both shorter and longer -term funding, utilizing our knowledge of federal programs, contacts at USDOT and WSDOT, and knowledge of how funding approaches have been used by other communities. Other Transportation Projects We understand the priority you have given to the waterfront at -grade rail crossings project. We also want to emphasize, however, that we can also help Edmonds with other projects. We have focused here on federal funding programs where the waterfront at -grade rail crossings project would be an especially strong candidate. We have broad familiarity, however, with all federal surface transportation funding programs and many non -transportation federal funding programs as well. We have secured funds for clients from many of these programs and we will use what we have learned from these successes to help Edmonds. We can help you decide which programs are most worth pursuing and then craft successful strategies for securing those funds. These other programs may have applicability to other transportation projects you are planning, such as Highway 99 and SR 104. Funding may also be available for projects related to transit enhancements, recreational trails and other projects. Throughout the course of our work together, we will keep in close communication with City of Edmonds staff to assess the progress of our efforts and how they could be improved. We will provide regular written reports as requested. We will visit Edmonds to tour the project site and discuss the project with Edmonds elected officials and staff. We will keep the Congressional delegation and relevant USDOT staff fully informed about the progress of the project and secure answers for any questions. Essentially we are your boots on the ground in Washington, DC on a day-to-day, week -to -week basis, ready to make contacts or pursue opportunities on short notice. We are ready and eager to get to work on Edmonds' behalf. We can accomplish great things together. CAPITOL STRATEGIES Packet Pg. 218 3.11 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Confirmation of Appointment of Vivian Olson to the Citizens' Tree Board Staff Lead/Author: Sandy Chase Department: City Council Initiated By: Councilmembers Buckshnis and Teitzel interviewed applicants to fill vacancies on the Citizens' Tree Board and recommend appointing Vivian Olson to the Board. Recommendation Confirm the appointment of Vivian Olson to the Citizens' Tree Board on the Consent Agenda. Packet Pg. 219 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Community Transit Choice Connections Award Presentation Staff Lead/Author: Carolyn LaFave Department: Mayor's Office Initiated By: Narrative Under the guidance of City of Edmonds Transportation Engineer, Bertrand Hauss, the City participates in Community Transit's "Choice Connections" program for large businesses. The program supports businesses affected by the Washington State Commute Trip Reduction Law which requires employers with 100 or more employees to develop programs that encourage their employees to use alternatives to driving alone for their commute. Each employee in the County (working in a company/agency with more than 100 employees) that uses an alternate mode of transportation logs their trip commute in to Community Transit's website (rideshareonline.com). Every quarter Community Transit selects an employer whose employees showed the strongest participation in the program (based on total number of trips reduced, emissions reduced, total gas financial saving). Edmonds was selected as the winner for the 2nd quarter of 2015. At the Award Ceremony on March 23, 2016, they selected an annual winner (from one of the 4 quarter winners) and the City of Edmonds won that award with the highest annual total number of trips reduced and emission reduction. Currently 25 City of Edmonds employees participate in the program. Previous Council Action <Insert Info Here> Recommendation <Insert Info Here> Recommended Motion <Insert Info Here> Packet Pg. 220 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Planning Board Update Staff Lead/Author: Diane Cunningham Department: Planning Division Initiated By: Background/History NA Staff Recommendation Consider the information and ask any questions. Narrative Planning Board members will present their update. Attachments: Planning Board Report_4-5-16 Packet Pg. 221 Planning Board Report 0 ca APRIL 5, 2016 1. ADMINISTRATIVE 2. ACTIVITIES- OCT., 2015 - MAR., 2o16 LAND USE PARKS AND RECREATION REPORTS AND UPDATES -------------------------------- 0 N t0 T- LA 4 I O N L m �0 W E u a a Packet Pg. 222 Lkninistrative ma ---- -------------------- 0 ----- Organization The Board meets the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7 p.m. Board Members as of 2/23/i6: Phil Lovell (Chair) Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig (Vice Chair) Matt Cheung Todd Cloutier Nathan Monroe Daniel Robles Valerie Stewart Alicia Crank (Alternate) Sam Kleven (Student Rep) The Board is back to full roster upon Neil Tibbot winning his seat on City Council and confirmation of Alternate, Alicia Crank Characteristics 4.2.a • Members represent a broad variation in: > Background > Geographic location within the city > Experience >Issue concentrations • The Board acknowledges the high level of professionalism and assistance from City Staff in all matters of research, presentation, and work We liaison closely with Parks and Recreation and Arts, CEDC , Mayor, the Council, and other city organizations as warranted. • Board received training via City legal counsel regarding: > Appearance of Fairness Doctrine > Quasi-judicial process > Public Records Act provisions 0 m a 0 N Lh 4� 0 E 0 0 m a 0 E 0 a Packet Pg. 223 Activities- 11AWd Use _Oo lots rezone, 75th & 76th Ave, RS-20 to RS12 [Recommended, moved to Council, and subsequently approved] Notice of Applications reconciliation between ECDC 2O.O3.002B.2 and RCW 36.7OB.11O [Recommended, moved to Council, and subsequently approved] Related: Parking requirements in RS zones addressing issues regarding provisions and enforcement [Recommendations forwarded to Council with interim provisions subsequently enacted] 4.2.a L M0 W 0 N to 4, 0 0 m E a a Packet Pg. 224 Parks Activities- Parks & Recreation Recreation and Cultural Services Re OUN e.� Department Director [Carrie Hite] briefed the Board on status of Programs and Projects including: >Acquisition of Civic Field >Marina Beach Park >Arts and Cultural Services > Local Parks Projects and Improvements >Veterans Plaza scope and plans > Long Range Plans and potential programs 4.2.a 0 CO d 0 N r t0 LA 4I 0 0 m a a Packet Pg. 225 0 Activities- Reports and Updates ----- 0 Introduction to Highway 99 Subarea study [Consultant— Fregonese Assoc.] > Land Use Analysis >Transportation Data > Economic Evaluations > Redevelopment Opportunities > Scenario Planning > Local and Stakeholder Interface Hospital w District i Improvements / - concentrated at Activity Centers 1 1 1 1 1 + Retaill 1 „ International 1 _ — District i — 1 Residential 1 — District Hotel 1 1 —+ District 0 m 0 N r LA 0 a� 0 m c 0 a� M U a Q Packet Pg. 226 4.2.a Reports &,Updates 0 ----- Edmonds City Code and Community Development Development Code Update Process [Consultant- Makers] >Reviews of process, schedule, and progress [2] > Briefing and attendance at 2 public workshops/open house including review of specific DRAFT language for sections on Lot Subdivisions and Signage > Organizational formatting: Titles 15 through 23 >Definitions of next steps [largely anticipated in 20161 >Allocation of consultant vs. city staff resources Capital Facilities Plan [CFP] and Capital Improvement Program [CIP] > Reviewed 2016-2021 updates and recommended to Council for adoption a. 0 N L6 4 V- a a Packet Pg. 227 - Waterfront Access Study ---- C_ ---------- Board briefed on progress to date by Task Force member: > Purpose and Needs > Task Force organization > Scope definition and concept evaluation process [reflecting input from 2 public briefings/workshops to date] > Overall Schedule for the study 4.2.a Packet Pg. 228 4.2.a Update- Growth in Edmonds 0 O Ca N r r t0 r LA 4 O am 6nane trope Drietea Y.B on various aspects of anticipated growth in the city with strategies towards: o > Minimizing environmental impact > Improving mobility C > Making efficient use of urban land As an outgrowth of this the Board undertook discussion at recent retreat U [Mar. 9, 2o16] regarding growth strategies with emphasis on different a housing opportunities with the goal of accommodating a diversity of population Packet Pg. 229 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Public Hearing to determine the eligibility of the First Baptist Church of Edmonds listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places Staff Lead/Author: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Initiated By: Narrative The First Baptist Church of Edmonds (currently known as North Sound Church) is located at 404 Bell Street. The original church building was constructed in 1909 at the corner of 6th Avenue North and Edmonds Street. The building was moved to its current location in 1929 and a basement was added. A house was moved to the site and connected to the rear of the church building to serve as parsonage in 1946. In 1950, a substantial remodel/addition to the church was completed. A former member of the congregation was Alice Kerr, the first woman elected mayor of Edmonds in 1924. Church documents show that Kerr played a significant role in church activities. She was a Sunday School teacher, President of the Women's Society, Church Clerk, and President of a church missionary group. Pursuant to ECDC 20.45.010 a property may be designated for inclusion in the Edmonds Register of Historic Places if it is significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or cultural heritage of the community; if it has integrity; is at least 50 years old, or is of lesser age and has exceptional importance. In addition to these three criteria, a property must also fall into at least one of the categories detailed in ECDC 20.45.010.A -.K. The Historic Preservation Commission discussed the nomination at their December 10, 2015 and January 14, 2016 commission meetings (Exhibits 9 and 10); and held of public hearing to consider the eligibility for listing on February 11, 2016 (Exhibit 11). The HPC has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council that the First Baptist Church of Edmonds be listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Previous Council Action None Recommendation Accept the Historic Preservation Commissions recommendation and adopt ordinance included in Exhibit 1 to place the First Baptist Church of Edmonds on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Recommended Motion Packet Pg. 230 6.1 <Insert Info Here> Attachments: Exhibit 1- Ordinance placing First Baptist Church on Edmonds Register of Historic Places Exhibit 2 - NorthSounclChurch Historic Preservation Designation Staff Report Exhibit 3 - Nomination Form Exhibit 4 - Owner's Authorization Exhibit 5 - BOLA Historic Survey Report Exhibit 6 - Church History Exhibit 7 - Alice Kerr Article Exhibit 8 - Gerald Tays Comment Letter Exhibit 9 - Historic Preservation Commission December 10, 2015 Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 10 - Historic Preservation Commission January 14, 2016 Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 11 - Historic Preservation Commission February 11, 2016 Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 231 6.1.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF EDMONDS LOCATED AT 404 BELL STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AND DIRECTING THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN "HR" DESIGNATION., AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the First Baptist Church of Edmonds located at 404 Bell Street, Edmonds, Washington, is included on the Historic Survey of Downtown Edmonds prepared by BOLA Architecture in conjunction with the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in October, 2004, as a property that could potentially contribute a historic disctrict; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission held a public hearing on February 11, 2016, to consider the eligibility of the First Baptist Church of Edmonds for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the staff recommendation the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council that the First Baptist Church of Edmonds be listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places; and and WHEREAS, the owner(s) have given their written consent for such designation; WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission regarding the features of the site which contribute to its designation -1- Packet Pg. 232 6.1.a and finds that the application meets the criteria of the ordinance as contained in Chapter 20.45 of the ECDC; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 5, 2016, to consider the Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The building located at 404 Bell Street Edmonds, Washington 98020, known as the First Baptist Church of Edmonds, is hereby approved for designation to the Edmonds Historic Register. The exterior of the building is hereby designated as significant. Section 2. The Development Services Director, or her designee, is hereby authorized to designate the listed site on the Edmonds zoning map with an "HR" designation. This designation does not change or modify the underlying zone classification. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. APPROVED: MAYOR DAVID O. EARLING JEFFREY B. TARADAY, CITY ATTORNEY -2- Packet Pg. 233 6.1.a FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. -3- Packet Pg. 234 6.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 5th day of April, 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF EDMONDS LOCATED AT 404 BELL STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AND DIRECTING THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN "HR" DESIGNATION., AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of April, 2016. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY -4- Packet Pg. 235 6.1.b City of Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Designation Staff Report fnc. i s9v Meeting Date: February 11, 2016 Agenda Subject: Application for designation of First Baptist Church of Edmonds (North Sound Church) at 404 Bell Street as eligible for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places Staff Lead: Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Property Information Name/Location: First Baptist Church of Edmonds 404 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Tax Account #: 00434400100700 Township 27 Range 03E Section 23 '/ Sec SE NE'/-'/ Sec Construction date: The original church building was constructed in 1909 at the corner of 6"' Avenue North and Edmonds Street. The building was moved to its current location in 1929 and a basement was added. A house was moved to the site and connected to the rear of the church building to serve as parsonage in 1946. In 1950, a substantial remodel/addition to the church was completed. Staff recommendation: Staff has reservations about including the First Baptist Church of Edmonds on the Edmonds Register of Historic places. These reservations are two -fold. First is in retard to the intesrity criteria. If the Historic NorthSoundChurch HistPres designation staff report.docx Packet Pg. 236 6.1.b Preservation Commission finds the period of significance to the 1950, then the integrity criteria may be met. The second is in regard to significance. The first designation criteria is whether a property is Significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or cultural heritage of Edmonds. The structure does not appear to be significant from an architecture, archaeology or engineering stand point. Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission must determine if it is significantly associated with the history or cultural heritage of Edmonds. Designation Criteria Meets Criteria Staff Comments 1. Significantly associated with the ❑ The Historic Preservation Commission history, architecture, archaeology, must determine if this criterion is met. engineering or cultural heritage of The building itself does not appear to be Edmonds... significant from an architecture, archaeology or engineering stand point. However, the church is associated with the history and cultural heritage of Edmonds. The First Baptist Church of Edmonds (and now North Sound Church) has served the City of Edmonds community for more one hundred seven years of its 126 year existence. If the Historic Preservation Commission finds this church is significantly associated with the history and cultural heritage of Edmonds, this period of significance is also tied to the integrity criteria below. 2. Has integrity... ❑ The church building has under gone many changes since its original construction date of 1909. The exterior of the building is largely unchanged since the 1950 remodel, with the only apparent change being the opening of the bell tower. If the period of significance is determined to be the 1950 remodel, then the building may be considered to meet the integrity criteria. First Baptist Church of Edmonds designation staff report Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 237 6.1.b Designation Meets Staff Criteria Criteria Comments 3. Age at least 50 years old, or has ® The original church structure was exceptional importance if less than 50 constructed in 1909 with a major remodel years old... in 1950. Both the original construction date and the 1950 remodel or both are more than 50 years old. 4. Falls into at least one of the following designation categories: Designation Category a. Associated with events that have ❑ made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local history. b. Embodies the distinctive architectural ❑ characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. c. Is an outstanding work of a designer, ❑ builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. d. Exemplifies or reflects special ® The church has been used for many elements of the City's cultural, social, weddings, baptisms, funerals and economic, political, aesthetic, community events. The congregation has engineering or architectural history. supported residents of the City of Edmonds for more than 100 years. e. Is associated with the lives of persons ® A former member of the congregation significant in national, state or local was Alice Kerr, the first woman mayor of history. Edmonds elected in 1924. Church documents show that Kerr played a significant role in church activities. She was a Sunday School teacher, President of the Women's Society, Church Clerk, and President of a church missionary group. f. Has yielded or may be likely to yield ❑ important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. First Baptist Church of Edmonds designation staff report Page 3 of 8 0 CD 0 0 0. CD o: 0 U) c 0 0 c a� 0 0 0 c 0 0 m a� a �L 0 x z L s V c 0 0 CO z 0 z N r z x w c 0 E 0 0 a Packet Pg. 238 6.1.b Designation Meets Staff Criteria Criteria Comments g. Is a building or structure removed ❑ The church was moved from its original from its original location but which is location at 61h Avenue North and significant primarily for architectural Edmonds Street; however, does appear value, or which is the only surviving significant from an architectural value or structure significantly associated with significantly associated with a historic a historic person or event. person or event. h. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical ❑ figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. i. Is a cemetery which derives its ❑ primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events or cultural patterns. j. Is a reconstructed building that has ❑ been executed in a historically accurate manner on the original site. k. Is a creative and unique example of ❑ folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical, the designation shall include description of the boundaries of categories. Significant 1. Shape: The church is made of by a sequence of two story wings sheltered by varied gable roofs, with a footprint that forms a complex "H" shape. 2. Roof and Roof The building has varied gabled roofs, with an engage flat roofed section Features: surmount by a small bell tower and cupola. 3. Openings The churches primary west facade is characterized by a projecting porch, (entries, etc): with turned columns supporting a shallow gable roof, a pair of entry doors. To the south of the entry porch there is a Palladian window group at the second story, with divided lites, which is aligned with a tripartite assembly of double -hung windows below. Two secondary enteries are provided on the north facade. Other facades also feature single and grouped double -hung windows with divided lites. 4. Projections: First Baptist Church of Edmonds designation staff report Page 4 of 8 Q Packet Pg. 239 6.1.b 5. Trim & secondary features Four simple supporting brackets at the gable ends are a common Craftsman's character defining feature. 6. Materials: The church is clad in clapboard siding and has clipped roof edges. 7. Setting: The house was moved to its current location around 1928 and is located on a block with houses of varying ages. 8. Materials at close range N/A 9. Craft details: N/A 10. Individual rooms/spaces: N/A. Interior features are not considered for nomination. IL Related spaces or sequences: N/A 12. Interior features: N/A. Interior features are not considered for nomination 13. Surface finishes & materials: N/A 14. Exposed structure: N/A One public comment letter was received regarding the nomination. Gerald Tays believes the church building does not meet the criteria for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Mr. Tays suggested the Historic Preservation Commission not make a recommendation on the church until the Commission has held a training session with Michael Houser, architectural historian with the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Attachments 1. Nomination Form 2. Property Owner's Authorization 3. 2004 BOLA Report 4. Church History Documentation 5. Alice Kerr Article 6. Gerald Tays January 30, 2016 Letter First Baptist Church of Edmonds designation staff report Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 240 6.1.b First Baptist Church of Edmonds, Circa 1050 (Photo Courtesy of Edmonds Historical Museum) 4h. i.� r7j First Baptist Church of Edmonds designation staff report Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 241 6.1.b 1948 Aerial Photo ate^' 1 1949 Aerial Photo First Baptist Church of Edmonds designation staff report Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 242 6.1.b Notes on historic register nominations: Chapter 20.45.020 ECDC* states that if the Commission finds that the nominated property is eligible for placement on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, the Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council that the property be listed on the register with owner's consent. According to Chapter 20.45.040 ECDC, listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places is an honorary designation denoting significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering or cultural heritage of the community. Properties are listed individually or as contributing properties to a historic district. No property may be listed without the owner's permission. Prior to the commencement of any work on a register property, excluding ordinary repair and maintenance and emergency measures defined in Section 20.45.000(H), the owner must request and receive a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Commission for the proposed work. Violation of this rule shall be grounds for the Commission to review the property for removal from the register. Prior to whole or partial demolition of a register property, the owner must request and receive a waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness. Because Edmonds is a Certified Local Government (CLG), all properties listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places may be eligible for a special tax valuation on their rehabilitation. * Edmonds Community Development Code First Baptist Church of Edmonds designation staff report Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 243 #P40 6.1.c two% Edmonds Edmonds Register of Historic Historic Places Orion Com Wsslon Nomination Form Type or print all entries — Please complete all applicable sections. Historic Name (if applicable): First Baptist Church of Edmonds Common (or Current) Name (if applicable): North Sound Church Site Address / Location Street Address or Location Description: 404 Bell Street, Edmonds, WA City / ZIP Code: 98020 B. Property Owner Name: North Sound Church (Pastor: Barry Crane) Street Address: 404 Bell Street, Edmonds, WA City / State / ZIP Code: 98020 Tax / Parcel Number: Name (say "Owner" if same as owner listed above): Dave Teitzel Contact Address: Street: 610 Daley St, Unit A Contact Phone #: 425-967-5925 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: i l - 06? • �JC Received by: File #: P W42p t 50bCo[ Survey/Site #: Phone #: 425-776-9800 City / ZIP: Edmonds, 98020 Date Form Completed: 9/16/15 D. Consent to be Listed (Optional — Not required for a nomination) I / WE the undersigned certify that we are the owners of the property identified on this form and hereby give our consent to having the property listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Name (Please Print) Pastor Barry Crane Signature Date Name (Please Print) GL r r C na K ' Signature Date Revised on 9114110 P40 -Historic Register Nomination Form NORTH SOUND Page I of 6 Attachm Packet Pg. 244 6.1.c E. Eligibility for Listing on the Edmonds Register Site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F) Site is listed on the State Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F) Historical Significance — Please check all that apply: 1. X Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local history. 2. X_Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. 3. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. 4. X_Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history. 5. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history. 6. Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. 7. Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. 8. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. 9. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events or cultural patterns. 10. Is a reconstructed building that has been executed in a historically accurate manner on the original site. 11. Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories; the designation shall include description of the boundaries. Historical Description In the space below, describe the history and significance of the site to Edmonds' heritage. You may elect to describe the site's significance in your own words, attach copies of other documents or photographs, and/or make reference to other materials (noting where those materials are available to be reviewed). For example, you may simply note that the site is on an historical survey, noting the survey name and site number. (Please feel free to attach any additional continuation sheets if you need more space.) The church was founded in August 1909 at a tent meeting of ten people at 5 h and Bell Street. In October of the same year, they received the articles of incorporation. Two lots were purchased at a and Bell Street, and a small church was constructed. In1929, a lot was purchased at 4"' and Bell Street and the church building was moved to its present location. A house was purchased as a parsonage and was moved to the rear of the lot. In 1949, the house was attached to the church and a complete remodeling was done to the church. The total cost was $56,274. 1-Iistoric significance: The church has served the community for over a century and was one of the first in the area to have a preschool. It's charming, well-preserved and traditional appearance in the core downtown area is striking and the structure is a landmark in Edmonds. Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form NORTH SOUND Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 245 6.1.c This section must he completed if the site is not on the State or National Register, or it is not on an approved historic survey. Please provide as much information as you can. Year Built: 1909 Architect: Unknown Builder or Engineer (specify): Unknown Architectural Style(s)*: Building Form*: Roof Type*: Asphalt Composition shingles Cladding*: Cement board shingles * Note: See later reference sheets for list of choices for these items. Overall Changes from Condition: Original: (Excellent Plan: Cladding: Windows: Other: Site: X _Good Intact Intact Intact Intact Original Site Fair Slight X _ Slight X _Slight Slight X _Moved Deteriorated X Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Date Moved: Ruins Extensive Extensive Extensive Extensive 1929 Unexposed Unknown Unknown Unknown X —Unknown Plan Type: Structural System: Foundation: Roof Material: Apsidal _ Pavilion —Balloon/Platform _ Brick _ Asphalt Comp Metal — Tile Center Space/ Polygonal _Braced Frame Concrete block _ A. Comp - built up None Courtyard X_ Rectangle _Brick X Concrete poured X A. Comp - shingle _ Other Cross/Cruciform— Round —Clay Tile _ Log _ A. Comp — rolled _ Slate E-Shape _ Semi -circular _Concrete block ` None _ Tile _ Unknown Hexagonal _ Square _Concrete poured _ Other _ Tile - clay _ Wood H-Shape _ Triangular _Log _ Parged _ Tile - concrete _ Wood plank Irregular _ T-Shape _Mixed — Post & Pier — Metal ^ Wood shake L-Shape _ Unknown _None _ Stone _ Metal - corrugated _ Wood shingle None _ U-Shape _Other _ Unknown Metal - standing seam Octagonal _ Y-Shape _Plank X Other _ X _Post & Beam Steel Stone - cut 2 Number of Stories Stone - uncut (excluding basement) _ Unknown Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form NORTH SOUND Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 246 6.1.c Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance: (Use continuation sheets if necessary, and for any photographs or copies you are providing.) The structure is a tall, wood -framed building with a distinctive cupola on the southern portion of the roofline. The building is painted in its traditional white color and is an excellent state of preservation. The main (and original) church building is the southern portion of the structure, while the church offices and meeting rooms are in the northern portion. After the two buildings (church and small house) were joined together in 1949, the structure has remained largely unchanged. The church property is bordered by a white picket fence that adds to the charming appearance of the building. (Please list and reference any sources which help document the historical value of the site.) Location Detail Parcel # UTM Reference: Zone Easting Township Range Section Category Ownership District Public Buildings) Private Structure Both Site Object '/a Section Resource Status Survey/Inventory National Register National Landmark State Register Determined Eligible Other: Within a District? Contributing? Local District: Northing '/a '/a Section Usage Current: Historic: Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form NORTH SOUND Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 247 6.1.c Yes Yes No No Unknown National or State Register / District: Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form NORTHBOUND Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 248 6.1.c f90% Edmonds Edmonds Register of Historic Historic Places preaft-Maw Commission Nomination Form Continuation Sheet for Item # Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form NORTH SOUND Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 249 6.1.d to_% Edmonds Edmonds Register of Historic Historic Places Presuvatim Commission OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Received by: File #: Survey/Site #: I /We the undersigned certify that we are the owners of the property identified located at: --::)(/ - tJ c z�14 , and hereby give my/our consent to listing the property on the Edmonds Register of Historic PIaces. NAME: (Please print) C7�!'� �Tc�f7C1- PHONE #:— 77 2u SIGNATURE: NAME: (Please print) SIGNATURE: DATE: DATE Attachml Packet Pg. 250 L5Z 'Bd 10313ed a f0 n 0 D) 0 D] (n C v 7 n = 'p I M 7 m 3 7 CD n+ N - O 0 (n n N o (A 0 N o D) O (D c C 0 C m (�Q. CD_ 3 Z N a m (D fA n y Q < IQ C1 w o' C i C fD ID 0- (n (n rt Al 0 (D Cn 0 0 0 � � N 0 0 0 �• O �. fD 0 m " m x 3 cD m Z3 Z3 (f) < m D o_ a 0 n N O K O CD 7 N n 0 0 a' 70 (D Z 9 o 0 fD ZF z (D O K a I N I I I C O 7 IO I N CD I O I I A v O d v CD � N V) Cn S M 0 3 03 n z O 7 O z m 3 R z o o m-n O T! °m o m o y o Q 1WZ C p- : Z I A O O1 0 Q- U) fD = O � _v °: .-. 0 o �7 I o m M cn cc ��, o 3 a n I o vi `� � m .o ' n o fD � J W n 0 O 0 C (n 0 IZ O (n Z 3.0 � v, o n I ® m ' CD O CD C CL (D Q CD C �I n y C < m (D DN o� c U) n 0 3 m 7 N a m C Ip 0 n 0 0 cn n O C = p N O0 O O a 3 n N' D y � O a a m Z fD N rn N O J A _ y 3 C) (n CD A -3O W Z m v? m a fD a 3 T M 7 m [� Q N (nN ICon 0 D z O O O 00 �m ;' No N fD n A A C c 0 O O D c m = a a m' :3 z O s m CI K z I 0 3 I fD v o ID D I N a n m o I K a- o ch 73 N I I N � 1 CD - a K) { D a oo I Co A Co O N O I I I-i I I V9 1Attachment 3 Z5Z 'i3d 18T)ed ID d (Do I �003 a;o a cn w m °• C m y n ?� N CD (D C1 � DD min "0 (0) ? Q 0 j sro c 3 a•o`a�wn <m �Q m c �0n �o2ao.p.a ��3 0 UQi 7 an�❑cnW� 0 7 [b - Q m cn W m Q 7 W Cn N N A ❑ :3 O - `S. CD CAD CAD < ❑' .C«�O N = `G ❑ Oto O to v O 7 0 C 0 7 m rn sopf •� rn g, m O CO JJ Q .y. Al G [D S 6 m S CD nw n o cr v a 6,2 pS� c W n 1 w A 3 j CD y SD 8 = Ifl j -+ .n.. n CL —• y y O O ❑ �+ rn y P7 PUS O n C➢ o 00 CL 0. o E a m- W o �np"p•mcwiO'w C CD CO oo� 4 C) � CO m ma [[a W O CD NCD rS n ro O C Q pw O �Qprn� O-Q O CD t2 pQ — 8 Cryg� ?D CD WO C4:�mrpO go EL' 7 N CL C>] w ��•N �x N LO s . =L n �rsQ ww .%.W �m n� Cl o . : Q QQ w U,, . x— (A ;, � iw p ❑ S.� j j' y Q ID C:C w= fl 9EF [Q 7n p m Q y O g IrD -❑ ¢m aC. en o .0 y vi m2 m� roa�n�i�w m a �j (� �2a) CD r c° 3 O C p7 � C azo, a-3 N 0 CO In �(n Quo CD CD n 2 Cl) r: w `G , `2 N CD1 y Q w CD Cl- d 7 < K 53 CD N_Q� O 3 7 O CD N Al 3 Cl) NW O.roCL CD yo 70 0 in S00 � c a CD cfln nco" CD0. C w y c o a .. 7 K w n N O Or w a cn w En O C CD CD o O mac° o v m � D w CD Cl o Sn CD CD w d O w N (O O Cn cn 3 O w < O a- CD w � CCD: Cl-7 CwA C w O 6 d CL 0 y O CD a Q O a CD N O O CD f� w m Q 3 CD * 0 O N N 7 o (n c pi in =r CD N � CD CD o Q 0 � c CC v o o N N � C w cn w O 3 Q3 O O CD Cn 3 O CC D C w Cn. m c 'o T m CD m w � o 3 x 0 a °' CD 62 T 'o a ro �G a 0 N Ci �G n O a C m y O w 3 0 0 CL cn .n. Z w 0 3 d w 0 0 n m co � c � EL 3 CD m m ICO A a � 0 M o fD r CD Cn CL O Q, N C E9 ' 3d 4a)1Oed cn a 3 n -0 < O S F 0 v < O S 3 ° O CD UR 7 p) N � S z fD z O O z O T 01 CD CD z O n < 3 0 O N (O 'O* 7 y N S Z l< 4 z m � N z O o m z O T m 3 N z O to � O O m U3 m N N r S z m z O O z O L T 01 m N z O d m 7 CO CO N O O A m O 51' x CD 7 1 RL a' V9 6.1.f 1909 1994 JfiirIA TNtt},fig# Tfluall Edmonds, Washington Attachml Packet Pg. 254 6.1.f TABLE OF CONTENTS Your Invitation 1 Church History 2 Pastor's Report 10 A Tribute to a Silent Witness 11 The Little White Church at Our 12 Back Door I Needed It It Needed Me 13 We'll Be There 14 Moderator's Report (1990) 15 The Gentle Art of Listening 16 Now Thank We All Our God 17 With Hearts and Hands and Voices The Cross of Christ and The Light of the Covenant 18 Some of` the Factors God 19 Gives -Us to Live By Pastors of First Baptist Church 21 Bible Sense 122 One of the Hard Roles of the Church 25 Packet Pg. 255 6.1.f 85th Anniversary The First Baptist Church of Edmonds is 85 years old. Come, help us celebrate what the Lord has done in our midst. When we think of the dear friends who have passed through these doors, we say with Paul: "I thank my God every time I remember you. In all my prayers for .all of you, I always pray with joy." (Phil. 1:3-4). We look forward with great joy to seeing you at' our 85th year celebration on Sunday, october 30th, 1994. We will get together in the: Fellowship hall at about lo:o0 a.m. for greetings and reminiscing. At 11:00 a.m. We will attend the regular service in the sanctuary. Fallowing the service we will return to the Fellowship hall for food, special music and recognition of our special guests. Do join us. It won't be the same without you. In Christ's love, Frankie Harris Deacon of Fellowship -1- Packet Pg. 256 6.1.f CHURCH HISTORY On August 22, 1909, cluri.ng a series of re- vival meetings conducted by Rev. J. J. Payseur in a big.tent on the corner of 5th and Bell Streets, in Edmonds, Washington, four persons made public confessions of faith and asked to be baptized, to unite with a number of other Baptists in Elie organization of a Baptist: Church. Following the baptismal service, the four persons baptized and six Baptists met.an,d completed the organization plans. Rev. Payseur became the first pastor of the first Baptist Church in Edmonds. On October 1, 1909, Articles of Incorpor- ation were filed in Everett and Olympia. On October 25, 1909, the Church purchased a lot near 6th and Bell Streets for $400.00. The Church later signed a contract to purchase an adjoining lot for $350.00, with the down pay- ment of $60..95 being Evade in cash and the balance payable at the rate of $20.00 per month with interest at: 7`k per year. On October 30, 1909, the Church voted to pay the pastor a salary of $500.00 per year. The construction of the church building on the two lots was soon commenced. The build- ing committee report of March 3, 1910, shows the total cost of the construction of the building to be $1,460.00. Some of the costs listed were: lumber - $581.37, hardware - $111.45, electrical wiring - $32.55 and labor $571.33. On March 27, 1912, a membership of twenty- two was reported. Rev. Thomas Howland was cal- led to be pastor in May, 1921. In accepting the call, he asked that no mention of salary be made. The members were to pay him as they desired. In May, 1921, a Bible School had EPA: Packet Pg. 257 6.1.f I been organized and had nineteen students. Dur- Rev. Ilowland's pastorate, a number of families united with the church who were active and faithful, even to the extent of bringing wood from the beach for fuel, to save money. On November 6, 1921, the church collection re- ceived for current expenses was reported as $1.11 and an expense item of $2.50 Was report- ed as paid to the pastor as his salary.he church memebership on May 1, 1922, twenty. Two years later, it was thirty-one members. On May 1, 1927, the membership was reported as forty-five. During the fall of 1929, a lot was pur- chased by the church at.4—rand Bell Streets and the church building was moved to that lot. A basement was added. The total cost of mov- inj!, e ui ng, construction of the base- ment and remodeling the building was $2,800. Dedication services for the new church were held on March 30, 1930, with Rev. W. H. McCall officiating. Edmonds First Baptist Church in 1943 -3 Packet Pg. 258 6.1.f The Cedar of Lebannon was about ten years old. In March, 1943, Rev. J. E. H- Nelson ar- rived from Hardin, Montana to become the first full time resident pastor. His salary was $1,200.00 a year, a $40.00 per month rental al- lowance and he was reimbursed $77.00 for his moving expenses. During 1946, a house was purchased and moved to the rear of the church lot. It was placed on a full basement and it became the parsonage. The Church paid $450.00 for the house, $392.00 to -move it and $328.00 for a new roof. In March, 1949, Rev. Norman Brown became the pastor. A complete remodel -of the build- ings was commenced in the fall of 1949 and con- tinued through most of 1950. This construction .resulted in the present building, in which the separate church and parsonage buildings were consolidated into one building. The cost of remodel and new furniture was reported as $56,274.00. Dedication services for the "new" church were held on December 10, 1950, with . Rev. Brown officiating. This is the architect's drawing of how the remodeled church building was to appear. i _OW Y x� # + �•' 4� -4- Packet Pg. 259 6.1.f In February, 1953, Rev. Lawrence Beal was called as the pastor. A new parsonage asment of $pu000 chased for $12,300.00. A down pay was made and the mortgage indebtedness provided for interest at the rate of 5% per year and monthly payments of $75.00. In July, 1958, Rev. J. J. Frey was called as pastor. The resident membership was report- ed at one hundred nineteen. In October, 1959, the indebtedness owing r on the church building was $41,131.59, with interest at the rate of 3% per year, and on the s parsonage was $5,517.93. 3 1 Edmonds First Baptist Church in A 'r MR- { The Cedar of Lebannon is now over a quarter of a century old. 4 i -5- Packet Pg. 260 6.1.f In August, 1960, Rev. Orval Taylor was `cal- led as the pastor. Late in 1961, decided to sell the parsonage acquired In 1953 for $13,000, from which $7,100 would be realiz- ed, to be used to Purchase the residence at 422 North Second Avenue in Edmonds as the new par- sonage at a cost of $181000. The sale and pur- chase were completed in the spring of 1962. In June, 1966, the church purchased a new Volkswagon bug for use by pastor Taylor. He can be seen leaving the parsonage in the bug. t rr>tL Meanwhile the Cedar of Lebannon continue to grow. 1966 r Packet Pg. 261 6.1.f On Friday, April a, 1966, at Good Friday services, the mall0cgany and ruby red cathedral glass Light- of: the covenant," hanging in front of the cross in the bapistry of the First-. Baptist Church of Edmonds, was dedica- ted, to burn day and night. Good Friday Edmonds Bov%'dlst To Dedicate Li 'Big U_ 4 By M AitG.%jR ET Il't7Ud light of the ► orld'. " -• s afi Miter i "1111us the Iwo, ever-huraing EQMONDS — hlentbars of Ihe;lights In the sanctuary are -Flat Baplist Church of Ed -,complementary one to another, rnond. Kill gather in Good Fri- Those who coma to worstlp, day observance at A p•nt. toA galller in the sanctuary to re might to drdicate the ne%OY aC,new their covenant Vows to God quired "light of the Covenant -";and leave to become the Eghl An all of Christendom sess;al the world." this time aside in remembrance! of the crucifixion of Christ, the! - dedication at at "The Light of the Covenant" 'Will serve as a con-1 stant reminder of this event to. members of the congregation.! The light, designed after the' church chandeliers. In mahog•' any••with panels or ruby red, cathedral glass, hangs in th'! baptistry In a manner to if-: Iuminale both the cross behind and"thc Communion table in[ Irani of the baptistry. I ^Kiten canditlates are pre -I f sented for Believers' Baptism,! kvWh in Baptist tradition is by' i Immersion, the candidate• stands under the Light of the; Covenant:' said the Rev- pr-1 Val Taylor, pastor. The deep red giew or t h t', light, which will burn day and! nigh!, calls to mind the words i of -tesus at the Last Supper:! "Drink of it, all at you: fart i this is my blood of the new•; { covenant, which is poured out, for many for the forgiveness of sins." Mitt. 26:27; 2d, F "When the wanhipper leaves! 9 the_sanctuary, his cles go to a } portrait of Christ, which is also, Illuminated day and night," the- pastor explained. "This is a re-j minder that Christ is the 'Lightl of the World- and that he said to pis ascipics, `You are the., �- • -i- s • Packet Pg. 262 6.1.f Rev. Daniel Kolke was called as pastor in 1982. He brought with him the music department which served Edmonds FirsL Bapt.i,sL Church for more than a score of years. He brought Bible teaching for which all Christians hunger. Dur- the years of his service, the church building was overhauled, on a pay as -you go plan, with the substantial contribution of Roy Robinson, which has brought the building up to its present condition. The Cedar of Lebannon had. to be removed because it was upheaving the ad- jacent sidewalks, streets and water and sewer lines and its boughs were a menace to all walking under or about the tree. Finally, after standing at the corner of Fourth and Bell Streets for more than fifty years, and after much debate, the great old tree was removed. The white picket fence which runs across the front of the property was instal- led and the building now appears thusly, mks __ � �►��11111 I11111111 Lam.._ • f Packet Pg. 263 6.1.f Pastor Rich Miholick has been at Edmonds First Baptist Church for a little over a year and, as always, much has to be done. We have now acquired a van to provide transportation for anyone requiring a ride to church. We are in the process of putting on a new roof.and painting the exterior of the building. The Kolke family has provided the church with a .�riori �tc�f �a .f Chu�rfi. •_ We have purchased a motor to drive the bell. We just don't have it put together yet. We believe we are now able to pay off the mortgage on the building. f you will have to come back to hear that bell and feel the warmth of the burning mortgage. f r 3 ' I - S �4 f 1 -9- Packet Pg. 264 6.1.f Pastor's Resort Ky tank 3_0 aui.to clear to me, and it lies speci- L tca]Jy in *he field of ev�an{;eLi.:�in. A:z L 3.nnk :►i,a�x1: tts7 in, ediat� r:rea ❑3 M. 110nds It, which our church is centered, I .find two kinds of people- the apartment A renters, and the retired folk whose hoines are here. great ,majority of them have no church home. We are a „natural" church horns for these fUl.k. Further out there are numbers of whole new street locations being founded, with brand --new homes by liter- ally the dozen. Some of them prefer a main --sine Bap_ t is church, others are specifically American Baptists who have moved out from Seattle churches- needs �riurce needs to go from house to houses seeking aueven must suxe]�r do this soon, th%s RRKL= • To delay year will be to lose these people. It is not enough to open the doors and say "Well, to here we are. Come onta ks{aswyst learn oot your Pastor istoseet� tha witness to them., tPay you receive the proper training, and that we go out to- gether, systemat:icalAy and regularly, to witness for Christ and His church. Nothing which we can do as a church is more important than this- not reading C� thie Bible, or praying, or being good, or attending , or tithing, as important as ali of these acts are fvr the Christian's life and growth. As we look into the future, we stand so id foundation. Out, membership is g have ear's od'c, e st operating fund with which to begin theye condition. as the church property is attractive and in goB.Y.1'y for the new year. The youth work is developing: and two choirs are on their ray. Attendance at Ron'- ing Worstlip has jumped rapi.dl.y this fall Sunday even - and r. Unified Family Service has aysraged 45 ings. to us: 1 believe that this is God's way of saying do "Edmonds, it is time for to move forward. 'that a yo what you think about i.t7 And more iznpo are you willing to do about �it? Orval Taylor, Past r (1960) -10- Packet Pg. 265 6.1.f A TRIBUTE TO A SILENT WIT14ESS As Pastor, I could dwell on many aspects regarding the little white Church on the corner of 4th and Bell. The tree alone has more than a page of history. It has survived many a storm and many a business meeting. Equally noteworthy and amazing, are the people that have kept the Church going over the years. Certainly, there must be a feather in each one of their heavenly crowns. Against many odds, ministry has gone forth and salvation has been offered from this Church. while it is true that there has not been much glory in numbers, there have been blessings nevertheless. The very fact that this quiet white Church with its blue roof graces the community, is reminder enough of God's eternal interest in mankind. Its bells alone have been•an inspir- ation and beckoned people to return to God. in the words of a friend, "Those bells have lifted my depressed spirit and brought me back to Church." And if for -that reason alone, then the Church has indeed served God. In this Pastor's belief, the witness of this Church will continue, even if it stands silent for another. sev- enty-five years. And may its traditional dignity continue to point men and women to God. With the Best of Wishes, Pastor Daniel A. Kolke (1984) Packet Pg. 266 6.1.f THAT LITTLE WHITE CHURCH AT OUR BACK DOOR Owen and I had just moved to Edmonds when my brother and I left for Utah to spend Easter with a sister. lihen I returned home, Owen informed me that he had found a church home for us. I asked him how he had been able to make his choice so quickly. His reply was, "There is a little white church right here at our back door. There are some empty seats there. toe need that church and it needs us. I am sure we will find many Christian friends there." He was so right. We joined that little white church and could not have been more happy over our decision. We found real Christian fellowship there. We were soon involved in all of the activities at our new home with our new friends. I could never have survived the illnesses and the loss of so many members of my family had It not been for the help of God, that little white church and the many Christ- ian friends I had made there. I had a place where I could go to find the kind of help I needed when trouble came or when I wanted to meet and talk with a friend. I have thanked God many times for that little white church with its clear ringing bells that lead Owen to its friendly, inviting, open doors. Gladys Stanley (1984) —12— Packet Pg. 267 6.1.f I NEEDED IT IT NEEDED HE I Thank God for the first night I stepped inaide the door of this Church, First Baptist Church of Edmonds.' Coming from out of state, to reside here in Edmonds, could have been a traumatic experience for me, three years ago. Especially, when I had a need for Christian Fellow- ship (Born Again Believers) and knew no one in this area of Washington. But I was welcomed with the warmest, friendliest spirit. That spirit and love reached out to me, with God's perfect timing, at a time when I needed it most. It was the same love of Jesus in the Church I had left in southern California. so, I'felt right at home here. This love reaching out didn't end that first night, nor the days to follow, but continued making me feel Special as well as needed. They ere truly family to me, to one another, Welcome all who attend our anniversary, with an open Heart and an open Hand. Leona, Mann (1984) —13— Packet Pg. 268 6.1.f WE'LL BE THERE The Ash1Cy-Cole9 are pr'vi.L"" and I""y to I blc to add our testimony to the others who have served our Lord Jesus Christ in this fellowship over the East seventy- five years. We came to Edmonds Baptist Church in 1972 and served five years until our retirement. Since retiring, we have served interim pastorates and have visited other churches but we always enjoy being able to return to our church home. We came to a loving people a dozen years ago and we were given every kindness that a pastor and his family could desire. over these past dozen years, it hag been our joy to share our home with our friends from this church in numerous spititual and social events. Those who served with us know we enjoyed the Blessing of the Lord together_ and we saw a steady, healthy growth. We believed when we retired, the members were united and ready for the next step. Samuel J. Stone gave us a very heartening visio6 of the place of the Church in God's Plan. In his .4ell_known hymn, one of our favorite hymns in all of the years of our ministry, he said: The Church's and Foundation is Jesus Christ her Lord, She is His new creation by water and the word; From Heaven He came and sought her to be His holy bride; With His own blood He bought her, and for tier life lie died. In many places, churches with a strong evangelistic witness join together with a denunciation of the social evils of our day. They are seeing remarkable growth. This surely encourages First Baptist members to pray and work to this end. Our love goes with this church as it moves into the next twenty-five years. At the end of that time, we will celebrate with you again, and Jesus will be there. W. J. and Mary (1984) -14- Packet Pg. 269 6.1.f E DERl1 OR' 3 REPOR-11 Reflecting an the tremendous changes the world hag experlanced thin year; are you as overwhelmed as i an? Sur hearts are heavy as we " hear of wars and rumors of Wars. We are not to be alarmed as nation Frill rise againat nation, and kingdom againat kingdom," but know that our Sovereign flo(I's purpowe will be done In spite of our folly. Give thanks for His mercy, pray for Ilia wisdom and know that time is abort. There are many here in Edmonds Who have not heard, or who are only now receptive to Ilia plan of salvation and that there Is everlasting peace. flaw bleaeed we are having Ilia word with us, that we may freely worship and fellowship with other believers. We have a wonderful opportunity to minister here In our own community with the support of our Pastor, the love of this Christian family and our steadfast little white Church on the corner of 4th and Hell. " Are You Milling? " "If you Piave a warm 11art dciaap, use it. If you have a gift or speech, speak. If you have energy, Open(] It for good. it You have time, share it. If you love little children, or youth, lead them. If you have money, give it. If you have a generous spirit, minister to the needy. if you can sing, by all means glorify Cod with your voice. If you are fond Of tho beautiful and artlstic, decorate Uod'a altar. If you have a heart or love, vialt the sick, greet the stranger, ay4pathixe with the trouiled or sorrowing ones. If you have business ability, the church and pastor need you. If your ralth is adequate, pray without ceasing. rf your church aeana life to you and yours, then tell others about it. Attend worship regularly and give thanks. If you love the Lord, pray for the church and its ministries. You need the church and the church needy you." (AUTHOR UNKNOWN) Robert eurrlll (1990) —15— Packet Pg. 270 6.1.f TILE GENTLE ART OF LISTENING His thoughts were slow Ilis words were few and never formed to glinten Hut he was a joy to all his friends, You ought to have seen him listen. Sam Anonymous Many positives come from listening. Yogi Berra once remarked, "It is amazing what you can see when you listen." While his phraseology may be creatively startling, he does make his point. It is reassuring to know that usefullness in life is not confined to the brilliant, to the wealthy, to the ar- ticulate, to the physically attractive persons. God can use even the least of us, if only we will listen. In Luke 2:46 we read: "And they found Jesus in the temple sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions." Note the order. The young Jesus was listening before he asked questions. Ile was face to face with Hebrew tradition accumulated for more than 1500 years. Jesus did not rush in with "What is the sense of this?" or "Why do you do that?" Ile listened. Ile heard what they had.to say. He knew the wisdom of listening in order to ask intelligent questions. Unfortunately, we omit the listening process toda We want to get the firnt word in and we know the last wor about everything. Because we do not listen otirselves ini_o knowledge, we become part of tl=r. prnblem and not part of the answer. The Chinese have the year of the lamb, the year of the chicken, the year of some other animal. We Christians should have the "year of the listen". Jesus encouraged his followers to listen. Yet, we are inclined to hammer away at God, telling Him of His plans for us and leaving little time or no time to listen to Ilia plan for us. While God may not speak in an audible voice, if we would just listen in silence, we would have no difficulty hearing Ilse will. Perhaps it would be wise for us. to pray the simple prayer: "O God, of whom we ask so much, help us to listen to what You ask of us." ' I will try to listen. I will try to listen. I will try to listen. Robert L. Butler (1991) —16— Packet Pg. 271 6.1.f T one of my favorite scriptures In all of the Bible Is found In the book of Jeremiah, C chapter 29 verse 11, For f know the thoughts that i think toward you, says the Lord. thoughts of peace end not of evil, to Ove you a future and a hope.' I love this scripture E because it is a promise that after (he hardships and the tough times in life, Domes the u.t promises, the rewards and the blessings that we cannot always see when we are in the c midst of the valley of tribulation. it tells us lha( no matter how things are now, that God t has a plan for your life. tl also reveals God's wonderful nature --He is good and He love, even when we cannot feel it in our fives through the L s loves us with an everlasting V pain. This church has been here for 85 years now, to comfort people in their pain and N to point the way 10 the One who truly cares for their souls, the Lord Jesus Christ. For "future a many people over these 85 years, Edmonds Firs( Baptist Church was part of the M m and hope" that God had for them. The stories of the victories and the heavenly blessings (hat have been shared here are not recorded in the annals of man to be i praised by others. But they are recorded In the hearts of people who will live forever ii with Jesus because they found Him here at this little church at Fourth and Bell. I can say with deep affection along with the marry pastors and the Sunday L school teachers this church has enjoyed over the years "you are our epistle written in re d our hearts, known and read by a14 men; you are manifestly an epistle of Christ, 2 ministered by us, written not with ink but by the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of 2 stone but on tablets of flesh, that is, of the heart" (2 Corinthians 3;2-3). You are pars of Gods "future and hope" for me and for all the pastors and teachers that have been a blessed to be a part of the ministry here at First Baptist. It has been a True and eternal joy for me to see some of you get excited about the word of God and the impact that o CD knowing the God of the scriptures can have in your life. God has brought many new 0 faces since I have been here, as He did before I came, and will continue to do after my days at this church are fulfilled. And you are the reason that God can do what He has f done in the lives of the people who have found Him here_ it has been by your G faithfulness and that of others over many years that God has kept (his a living, viable N ' wilness to the community that Christ still changes lives. And You have kept these 2 doors open so that others could come in and find salvation. As you seek to serve Jesus "do not despise (he day of small things" and do nol compare yourself with others or compare your church with other churches because we are all a unique piece of art, crafted by the Almighty. And only in eternity will our work t V be fully revealed. I am looking forward to all of the good things that God has for us as m we run this race of faith together. i think that a great old hymn in our book says what_ we all feel best, "Now thank we all our God with hearts and hands and voices...." x w } f Keep serving Jesus, Church; x "e� is your life_ Pastor Rich Miholick a -17- Packet Pg. 272 6.1.f TILE CROSS OF CHRIST When we enL-er Lite sanctuary of Lite First - Baptist Church of Edmonds, Lite Cross of Christ and Lite Light of Lite Covenant draw our gaze, for they are at Lite very center of attention. What do they signify? Through the experience of the Cross, we are enabled to enter Lite New Covenant relation- ship to Christ and the Father - God, are filled with the Holy Spirit and are reconciled with our brother. Beneath this Cross we sinq Ills praise, humbly confess our sins, are burled in baptism, rise to new life in 111m, break Bread together, hear the Good News proclaimed, receive a renewed vision, andcommit ourselves as God's Servant People who seek to carry out our assigned tasks, both here and in Lite world. THE LIGHT OF THE COVENANT The Light of Lite Covenant is an ever burn- ing symbol of Christ, Lite Light of the world. Its glow recalls that lie gave Ills life for us: also, it calls to mind the sparkle of the gfape In the Communion cup. its crown affirms that the crucified One is now King of Kings and Lord of Lords. When we are baptized in the fellowship, arising from the water, the Light of the Cove- nant shines down on us, "welcoming us into this warm and gracious fellowship of Christ. Both the Cross and titre Light of the Cove- nant are reminders of what Christ himself has done for us because of God's self -giving love. Therefore, do not pass casually through the sanctuary, but each time thank God for Ills grace, sufficient even for us. -18- Packet Pg. 273 6.1.f Great convictions to live by, great resources to live from, great purposes to live for, these are some of the factor God ig ves us to live by. For this we thank God. Be in a ch da with This is the day which the Lord has made I will rejoice and be glad in it Look about what is near and you wll! be surprised at what the Lord has done. Don't usli uur worrie behind youx, out of sight, where you forget them. Bring them out front, line them up, look them over. Decide those you can do something about and which ones you will just have to live with. Don't tr to do o much. Learn how to do nothing, or many things worthwhile cannot catch up with you. Pause to, nurture friendships and: deepen family ties. —19— Packet Pg. 274 6.1.f Use your leisure time wisely_. There is more healing in playing 5 minutes with a dog than in taking a vacation trip around the world. Live one day at a time. Never let yesterday use up too much of today. If you have but 7 days to live, spend them one day at a time. Develop a sense of humor. It will help us over the rough places. To laugh at ourselves is a sign of maturity. We need to take ourselves with a grain of salt. Attempt -to turn every minus into a lus. If you are handed a lemon, make lemonade. Make some good out of every bad situation. Give something of yourself eacli (lax. Do something for a brother or sister each day at some cost to ourselves. Is there a better way to overcome our own problems than by caring for the needs of others. Paul Anonymous —20— Packet Pg. 275 6.1.f PASTORS OF FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH J. J. Payseur J. A. Haynes Rev. Colter Rev. Fretz A. J. Leal Thomas Howland W. H. McCall Herman Watson E. G. Manley David M. Erickson Harry Thoms J. E. H. Nelson Norman W. Brown J. F. Watson Lawrence C. Beal J. J. Frey Orval Taylor Jack Legate Phil Graf Chaplain Porter W. J. Ashley -Cole Samuel Quiring Duncan Palos Cameron Angel Daniel Kolke Rich Miholick -21- 1909 - 1910 1911 - 1912 1912 - 1913 1913 - 1915 1917 - 1910 1920 - 1924 1924 - 1933 1933 1934 - 1938 1938 - 1940 1940 - 1942 1943 - 1949 1949 - 1951 1951 - 1953 1953 - 1958 1958 - 1960 1960 - 1968 1969 - 1971 1971 - 1972 1972 1912 - 1977 1977 - 1978 1978 - 1981 1981 - 1982 1982 - 1993 1993 - Packet Pg. 276 6.1.f BIBLE SENSE III (by Umbarto Rellermeifter, ERB) Score one point for each correct answer. Some questions have more than one correct answer. With multiple part questions, score one point for each correct answer. You are not permitted to check all of the suggested answers to a question and then score a point for each correct answer. If you insist on doing so, then deduct a point for each incorrect answer. Score yourself as follows: 0 - 10 tsk, tsk 11 - 20 ' not good 21 - 30 not bad 31 - 40 pretty good over 40 you are well versed 1. Ecclesiaphobia is the fear of churches. ( ) true. ( ) false. 2. What is the longest book in the Bible? J ) Psalms; ( ) Peter; ( ) Paul; ( ) Mary; ( ) Great Expectations, ( ) Proverbs; ( ] Adverbs; ( ) Adjectives; L ] Pronouns; ( ) Lamentations. 3. Jonah wound up inside a whale after he tried to evade the Lord's command to go preach in the wicked city of? ( ) Corinth; ( ) Carthage; ( ) Constantinople; ( ) Instanbul; ( ) Cairo, ( ) Ninereh; ( ) Cincinnati; ( ) Now West Beirut; ( ) Wallace. 4. Match the reformation leaders in the first column with their geographical origins in the second column. (a) Martin Luther (1) England (b) John Calvin (2) Bohemia (c) John Wycliff (3) Louisiana (d) John Huss (4) France (e) Huldrych Zwingh (5) Switzerland (f) Jimmy swaggart (6) Germany 5. On a modern map, the Biblical hill of Calvery is in Jeru- salem, in the Church of the holy Sepulchre, is entirely within the Church, and is one staircase high. ( ) true. ( ) false. 6. Who put the Gideon Bible on the moon? ( ) the man in the; ( ) Sam Irwin; ( ) James Irwin; ( ) Irwin Trieger; ( ) John Beck's brother, Irwin Beck. 7. The "cities of refuge" referred to in the Old Testament were for? ( ) Political Dissidents; ( ) Religious Heretics; ( ) Social Outcasts; ( ) Unintentional Murderers; ( ) Conservative Republicans; ( ) Religious Fundamentalists. -22- Packet Pg. 277 6.1.f B. Cordelia was the one faithful daughter of? ( ) David; ( ) Job; ( ) Lot; ( ) King Lear; (') Tevye; ( ) Jethro, father in law of Moses; ( ) Puti-el. 9. with which instrument was Abraham prepared to slay his son Isaac before the Lord interceded? ( ) an axel ( ) a knife; ( ) a club; ( ) Isaac'a electric lute, who could blame Abrahaml ( ) the jaw bone of an aas. 10. According to St. John in Revelations 21:16, what place's dimensions are approximately 15 miles cubed? ( ) The Garden of Eden; ( ) Purgatoryl ( ) Heavens ( ) the eternal sweat shops ( ) Jerusalem; ( ) Noah's boat. 11. From what tall vantage was Moses permitted a glimpse of the Promised Land before his death? ( ) Mount moriah; ( ) Mount Sinai; ( ) Mount Pisgah; ( ) Mou;tt Rushmore; ( ) Mount McKinley; ( ) A Beirut high-rise; ( ) Colombia Center: ( ) lookout Pass. h 12.- Whom did.Joshua condemn to become hewers of wood and drawers of water during his conquest of Canaan? ( ) Moabites; ( ) Philistines; ( ) Gibeonites; ( ) Good Samaritans; ( ) Canaanites; ( ) Edmondi tes; ( ) Concreti. tes. 13. The ancient land we refer to today as Phoenicia was known in Biblical times as? ( ) Ur; ( ) nabylon; ( ) Wahkiakum; ( ) the land of milk and honey; ( ) Jerusalem; ( ) Shoshone; ( ) Shiloh; ( ) Canaan, ( ) Canada= ( ) Palestine. 14. The name of Ruth's sister in law was? ( ) Operh; ( ) Opera; { ) Orpah; l ) Opal; ( ) Orcas; ( ) Obarb. 15. From what part of the Bible comes this phrase, "For every- thing there .is a season and a time for.everything under the heaven." ( ) Not in the Bible; ( ) Is to; ( ) Proverbs; ( ) Psalms; ( ) Job) ( ) Ecclesiastes; ( ) Daniel. s 15. Match the son with the father and with the tribe of Israel. (A) Ammiel (1) Gemalli (a) Asher (B) Caleb (2) Hori (b) Benjamin (C) Gaddi 43) Jephunneh (c) Dan (D) Gaddiel (4) Joseph (d) Ephraim (E) Geuel (5) Mathi (e) Gad (F) Hoshea (6) Michael (f) Issachar (G) Igal (7) Nun (9) Joseph -Manasseh (H) Nahbi (8) Raphu 00 Judah (1) Palti (9) Sodi Li) Naphtali r (J) Sethur (10) Susi (j) Reuben (K) Shammu-a (11) Vophsi (k) Simeon s 3 (L) Shaphat (12) Zaccur (1) Zebu un —23— Packet Pg. 278 6.1.f 16. Herod's wicked stepdaughter wasn't the only Salome in the Bible. Another Salome was the mother of? ( ) Esau and Jacob; ( ) Shem, Ham and Japheth; ( ) Job's Daughters; ( ) the Apostles James and John; ( ) Aaron and Moses;'( ) Carol and Leslie; ( ) Nadab, Abihu, Eleazer and Ithamar. 17. Before the Good Samaritan came to his rescue, the way laid traveler in Jesus' parable was shunned by a priest and? ( ) Hittite; ( ) Canaanite; ( ) Levite; ( ) Shiite; ( ) Shootite; ( ) Edmondite; ( ) Mormonite; ( ) Jehovah Witness. 10. If the apostle Paul were to send his epistle to the Galatians today, to which modern day country would it be routed? ( ) Jordan; ( ) Cyprus; ( ) Iraq, ( ) Iran; ( ) Ireland; ( ) India; ( ) Indianapolis; l ) Indianola; ( ) Turkey; ( ) the dead letter office. 19. The Bible tells us that Noah built an ark. The Bible also tells us that Bezalel made an ark. Bezalel's ark was? ( ) Bigger than a bread box; ( ) Smaller than a bread box; ( ) Bigger than the ark built by Noah; ( ) Smaller than the ark built by Noah; ( ) Plated with gold, inside and out; ( ) constructed with acacia wood: 20. After Moses and his followers left Egypt, the Lord issued instructions to Moses to take.a census of all men twenty years and older who are able to go to war. The tribe exempt from the draft was the tribe of Levi. The Levites were assigned the following duties, in lieu of going to war: ( ) the hewers of wood and drawers of water; ( ) converted the plows into swords; ( ) assigned for, the work connected with the Tabernacle and its transportation; ( ) kept the home fires burning; ( ) maintained the camping areas for the other tribes. —24— Packet Pg. 279 6.1.f 1 t i One of the roles the church should have - it needs to keep reminding people that they are called to be: people of God in the context of the workplace and not set aside a second kingdom that people come to on l Sundays. One of the church's missions is to equip people to lead lives worthy of the gospel day in and day out - and that's hard. -25- Packet Pg. 280 octal paper of the ctt><. It nav- ids{ - jJ 0 �tJ r er falls to baowt Edmandx and 'E CITY- OF EDMONDS give the news, :1,50 a year. :R FOR ALL THE PEOPLE UV,'wSi:&TUl31)A1%-jd.l�;(`.1+:Jlf. PIP lti, 19w? — —' �� 0 .No. 20. VERY -KERRY CHRISTMAS' Opera House o1La se t'll F: Ntt'1 r(91,1I:V'N i9 Rna:. rift MAGIC CITY. '• Ou U,p I:ost day oY Novcrn bpi n "Fd moo da Is surely growing beDedicated vlrilcr of r:'Ilrewl ..witcilnu' started sump." remarked a prnnih,ent husl- iI 5f. twat, turd bcrorn Ihe a011 shout ness man of Fverett wile" )assing the un Ih•pewher _n,on° Inc-u wort r•ItY aboard the steamer Telegraph )nds Athletic Club itoraaa uuI rm pl°Yvu•u t. terry' ypsicrdq} "She should 6c called the ``liar of loins, rp lit Ihi Twln (:tiles. dlaglc City. Fvpry time I pass I see. 1 Dulaill IN Superior, and all _he titles some uew IndustrJ springing up of oI Ihi Nurthe•rsl de•penllent ton file the waterfront or anpie other great 10 fret, will) hullding light and 111•Ighl. The I'ur- °'°v,•m,•ut ill' suUplles, w•err s1•rloasly luyrrnventout going on," each aide, nlshfllgs anal drroratlons w•In he, lei:,ITea•tpd- I'1-esidoul 1 rank A. Ila+rhy of the three stirs place by lilt• opening. ,1. V. Yost.j COCYCII.NF,F.TIKG. e high oval the owner, desprves praise for giving! Swlirhute•u's 1'nif dorharrs that this At the regular. meeting of the CI[y the floor be lhp• clty, at n coat or 81 P,nun; Ilsl is st ri- l}' :' Northwrvit•rn dlstr•Ict Connell Thursday evening the Il all III: \Nash log- most modern building. Jlr. Post sag-� fig 1, 1, and wares the 11aslrrn rail- routine busloess was, transacted, gents that (It(, n,rrchanls and host-� roads to keep their hands off. At file Numerous bills were ordered paid vhieh is the ness people, donalir anal hasp a flue °ulavl, Ile• strike Is lilt worst that and an ordhianee llifroduced. The date oP I,' I the No rttnvpsl has sera for nv en:y prof rst ugalest the flit pro vom°.It of :(formals, •s 1nrUllc Christ nuts auPprr IJn•rr for all cru rs, "lira b" Inlie'r al Ihi sw1tc11 Niulll street wan' nverl•ulrd m,,I the ill lzrus, anal Ilrrt It be, um de, a hog ix tin vi heat gnus:uu t•r or "atilt n, III,- irav- vo,'h orle•red done.. A reading or ig' L,slnlleeL l celebration and lour feast_ Thr fit.- I•llug publlr•, our is It IIkrIY that such 6rr,inanrp Na, 90— the •whole view farce favors the Ines orrleure could do touch to all- hl be found In-an- gnod dinner. I other rnhimn of Ih1e Ixxur—sift ire ---. uulgle Ihi hr•wilderlog uuu+x of Ihi 11111) t'"ro" 1i1 0! N I\'l: Without strait to 11f1\IF: IY� N<1.11 R. :\ti'1'tiIN11I'rrlghl Ira lilt Ih:U Is nlrrudy range'al' the county �Itrl"INU 1'It-P I'It121. rand.. Illd cal I, I rout used. Tfor h, is fact Is not s We. called PARIS, De(-- la, --Some now aloof lost slglol ref h}' Ihe• Switch oleo's n went Fast aa[onlsh Leg moving piclnrr films, oft•- The Cloy -Attorney. offered no or- 1'uion. Nor do the}• forget that A dlnance fle relation to the saloon 6usl- In° visit in Pirlinfi va rlous germs and mlrro 6rs serikr oY iwa tr erks' dnrat inn Is sure fgan. ))NIL In action were shown al a merlin • (,f nest In Isdmonds to the effect that 6 co cuusr a fond pauir ht man: of the I uut11 the hopulntion gets to be L,000, e the same the s:a ran is Nor III,.:\cadr•u'y d-•s io„•rior lowils. Sur" aofllhlg cell- the number of saloons, shall sot be been nllhtg StueurpK_ This Is uoI lilt first es- I,.rs cis liar(, and Alin, most over file; that the. nd for see-• hibilion of fhr• kind, total it is osprvl- iuo °rt vvt•ry ❑amtfut Ihi}' rat- '1'Ite lleruse of each V shall by a;,00. That if one saloon 'cring from rd In show some sl:u-lling drvrlol'- u,tuers haw- credit at the mining Hard- Thel "bats in the +vale of wili•r.iug Ihi mac- drops ant o! business theWil Ilce"xr. shall slor,•s only sit lung as ,he,}- are a[ _ g-pleture film in 0 hr!•o;; ,Jispns,•. aggregate rensc• sit that all will pay !n the he Sour-d In g work, :wd while III" raih•onds are aggregate E;t,yOp. If all flat one Firs. AI- Ur. Core:wdon, 41 young physlrl'a'I• still Ihi mint•s are closed. In fhL 'd, She Was well versed " the "ta(ty of (fit. ItOu- quit bust ness Ile shall pay the whole m:ulnrr "laic Derr .-,.DOD• ntpu are $3„'00. bill has Itely little, has Intel), brrn allowed r;it.iag a drspt-race %ituation. A In her tor- by the Path, !••errs in make use of canvass of votes of the r?cent theft nppnrutus for a blogrn ph -Ilia '1'In• mills tit �Ilnurn polls, h:n•log r•fcotiou was node and approved by their actu rt•r to develop a new au11 Insulllplrnl storrroono for their man- the Couucfl_ . ufaetared products, harp closed Itltful9, wopr:erful alli lcalion of this ultra- down. The situatlon. is serious \IAl' DRAW PARTY LINFIS, qulcroscope. He has succeeded in raoagh, if it' Is rnnpued only to the popular photographing these ultra-ndcrosc°l'- Norlhwi-sl, lhrt in spite of the St. '•Hereafter," said a prominent poll- owat. f.um- Ic iutages upolt Ihi relulold tape, A Paul mriki- managers' deelarn Lion , eotpic of few weeks ago nloolbers of the AcitA- - mood, since the city election n c Ed- ihat thee do not want It spread Last, moods, "we expect to have each po- hls lrletds emle des Sciences saw theru enlarged the report Is rurrent that the train- lltfral 'arty Ish Colum- upon a screpu. sho-atry all sorts ot- 1 have a ticket i l the Held na-u nY all III,, Isasu•rn rallronds• and work for It. This will ienneth Is animated scmitrr-that had never been . prevent ruutllrising upwards of OD,000 eat- existing evils as most lot,, men will I. Rnal It 15 witnessed save b}• • [he .•yes of the, plovers, will shortly present their al their party licks[. Too often In went to most skillful microscopists. Blood d••uuuul for n tru per rent Inrreuse a ad will re- corpuscles joslled ono :another lit file, good man suffers because of some Idays with capillaries of :a frog's foot: n "ages, putty grfevance o[ I plmgo_ _ art opponent and Will' if'(- en°eta°us (tit rfslalaa the strength that should be received will ecrnr c}'tes dprun ring red globules; hard lea lllc at hand, Ihe trahuueu have he, Re- - little gimlet -like particles were seen ,•Iby him Is directed elsewhere." srcled for their nmUn tilt the time - nneth• I itoating fit the blood or a hlyd; tiny that compels the- most hurried call - eels, with wiggling flus, tackled blond ai dt•tmllou °f the Issas. \\'hr.'t the NRIV ItAl'TIST CHL'nCH, �eorhilaeles still tlult•e- than them- xlrfkr was flat thlsioe.}s Dial the 1 sph•rs: Ihe•se w•lenl crraturrs orlon;;- A new church building, 30xfiG, Is tilt of Duluth rcI'orted flint forty- bein rpsslon Ix ed to the same clime with the famocis g erected on Sixth and Edmonds a fa -at holiday ll l' \\'14•h lltrl,, who are �reulber-s 3itauiy, Aeslde the main church. l rypunusonu•s which dr•lerntf°e' the of the llrofhrrhood of Hallway T rala- there Is a Sunda school room and-" next publi- sleeping sickness in mail, though III y urday, De -I Im'n. hud'relurnt•tl to work; th.:' eon- stud)'. 'I'ho lfaptfstr _ EI this case it was a cal that seta "fillet- 9 ldinIII 4a located ditinns there rrrrr normal, and t1w( art one Nee all our ed with them. Other displays shnwrit aide of she budding, vlll Uo re,- Ihe harkhnue of Iota strike was brok- _ �,• the eoaguluflon of blood still III'- do- pal. Rut at the same time other title" dR\I ItROKIs\, •t hp print- 'he co ferr of corpuscles its. blood dries reported that curs fit 'the freight _ tY and w111 III,. Still more astnnishing dlna, asp rnrI a wrr,• heing moved by 1•nrse- As two Crent Norther' Irlllts were • wife }•oa In preparullon: pow ,•r,�-t]nlller'x. I pnssfl,g each nit IIETTIelt NCIIDOI,N. Pi\KY, The school patrons of Arkansas are corning to appreciate the val- any Is hav- tie of work accomplished ' through foundntlon School Improvement Associations, igine. This thus bringing together the patronrt 'gent man- and teachers to work for the prat. The ma- deal betternierit of school conditions. The tom, l.nst year this' campaign was In- arge, deep stituted by • State Superintendent George •B. Cook. ,Eighty-three act tive aeaoclatloos wfth three thou - A nIVALT sand mcmhers In thirty-nine coun- :ownslte la then, corn for' the' loving cup Pull morels nfr.—A by 9a nn>•tM nadnnl 'r' L, No— MISSOUill CAN tint)\\' US ABOUT Irlltiwr 1.1$(:INLA7 I(IN. The Innate of "Direct Legtela,iol" ns An an'endmenl to the state conntl- tutiou- Is now being agitated by' an active stale organlsatlou, anti every tandldnle• for the- stale legislature will he pledged to this mensure. Direct legislation -Is endorsed ley n.'nna whereby the people can gel dote what they want dote. ll.the 1perrple of Washloglnn hall direct. log- IYIIIIIei'1 Lr the constitution of . the oar, Tuesday evening Joist below the Mallon, ono of them struck an unknown man who was crossing the tracks, broke hie arm, and otherwise badly brulxed him. He was taken to Fverott for treatment on 011e of the trams. NOTICE (IF ' STOCKIiOi.HEltlil UEETZN Notice Is hereby given . that the annual meeting of the .Stockholders of the Washington Steel oft Dolt Com- Pany will be held at the office of the Company. In the City of Edmende, 'cep l,del ,3 fI I iJ &3 kAel W Ce- l Packet Pg. 281 IN EDi111ONDS AND SNONOMISH COC l"V T Y BOOSTER! OFFICIAL PAPER FOR ]HE CITY Car- EDMONDS. AV !N APEA DC•:v7- LOCAL FOR ALL THE 'PEOPLE DMONDS, SNOHOMISIi COUNTY, WASi.r-INGTON, SATURDAY. JANUARY few City Council Hisao 6.1.f ru�• The. Itovyrw: =ci•.-Irpt t,c$al pa;..:r oi• r!o• guy' g!Ir the• new- $I.- a SCHOOL OPENED WINTER N R FOR THE WITERM. '1{I � IM[S. Roy Schuman 1 The prevalence of typhoid and scar- le[ fevers and have caused a a(�d- fOm W [olds Its Firs. Session colds tolling offof from a third to nearly yphoi J O _ - f a half in attendance In some of the • Was Jun grades in schools. a i �Wer System rirst and Most Important Matter Dis- HealthOfficerSchmidt and Dr. hall expressed e opluioo that coo- the •a; .1,l rs. !\label t•1. Schllmnl 3 i cussed. D� �e of Meetin Changed From Thursda ate y dhluns here regarding contagious dls- e;wes tire not such its to deuulnd the lr. Itny Srinlmaclmr :Ind , I•AI V r, aid Marla. fire! M. Low N closing of the schools, and Sec. was Edmonds, as taken III a?)(a:r to Wednesday, Night. S. J. White Appointed City page 104, of the Code of Public Iln!giving time. Tile filcklles9 CL s truction rpikes nttlaldanco Ivan put' I In typhoid lover. Son .1hal m AltorlleY' spry bcller and then again la i • Hopes of rcrorrry were l i ''�� ho council mI-I'Toe•sday'..i-.an;ur Jth, ar <u!'ding to Irr,v. and Ill., nniyor anbthe old council wen'gtrtil of o01cr.�EDMONDS HIGH TEACHER !until Thursday, December LL the• new IlMyor,and council ;vere >wurn in. As C. T Roscoe, :lr„ rv-rler•led cir- :Illorucy, h:t<I not qu;Iliiied, WINS HONORS AS AUTHOR.�wl-en she was called away I, r.,gnirrd limo, the office was declared vomit, and S, J. While was appointed .!aid took the office. II said beloved by all who k '0?, � 1, :1!ayor William Ib•rlrr in Ole chair, Zoo-har Ile,rc•il, 7,d ele•rk, 1. W. Clam,. .iuhn Thornton :old Thomas{ Miss Illanche grace, of the i'nl-^ 'Pile funeral tnah glare ,L I. nr•W' ru'twiltin•n. s,:nr h:>.lucss w•:u tea nsarled be'..n• :iljonrning to meet %V,,inrsday evening. The new lrersily n( P: ashiug(517, and teachrr`Congregational church o M sa-b•rlvd I— council ulvetiog Is III,- :irsr and thinl "•C.•d nc--.Iars in each month. •:\ Ithla year In our high school, has writ. Janunry ^nd, whcu ROV. J N rrsnlutinn was ;i,loplod sting file salary if Hr:tl L', Oflircr Schmidt at E1,51) 1 year" .VI hills In were !ten a short story entitled "Tile Man,;_ochwood, S "Connor pets( -With the-Snliln,•' which appeared in:churcllr:oRlclated and-•wh< ,I:tnu•s heady, the rrfirint: i::c:yor Ili year, as mayor of I'n city. 'in leaving the uf!lcc�tbe January Issue of the Black, Cat Isc•nnaii way based on' I •:press,-d Ili,. wish In see 1i:.• city coultrlu,• to grow• a;!,! lhat he oxilected Ili still b • iriler_estrd In city and county magazine. T,qu story Is a true onc•i^linown tenter (Ind are all sell affairs. :and tells of a man 'but West,` in our, Ilia ways are past ilnding d ecnrga• M, Lrvq;i;"Ihr no: .n;' city' clrrli, 1w, !ill.,d [It,- ;:flier tcry acceptably rear the past In-c year:>, lie• is;'twn state. who, having failed in life,! On the flrtit Sunda_' in rl,•th .,i Ill!. �4chenl Ile::!: r! :od of the Pen r,•, Icamml(s suicide. ]Roy W. Schitu.acher and G .hlscirr "1'ho von sell nu•t in rrgnl:r -, n. ion .m 1\'eJtn•s.!ay in:•• ad ,r it hunt u:nch I"'• iur. n:.ry Work, Pn•ssed Ut,! The new' story writer has done eJl : Low,a were. inarrled in (his G h nrr4.•d-,„er:r:r quc.; it. All pn•srl.l L.voi.•I (It prop,silinn, and City 1•:a ;I tee,- Mlssimer's Id;1.19 and torial work on tho-'Slate College pi' just six itfonU.s aftrrwan T-- ucl l•-s of a anal: :c,rcr sy-tom. rost!ng 5i7,.utm, ,c„r,- pled and an .irdiitane, ^: 11i.tg for an early clectlun pers. the Uii,ersity Dolly and Ih" order of a strange Provides v In nl.liug Iho ,•ity i.rr, !'I,- pn rpnzr, will I..• pa-"•d nre:::I rr;lag. _ - I Washingtonian. Miss Brace. is :t most, the first Sunday In the new �r _,._,• •,_ _ _y__ ,.,,.,� �mm,__"—_---_^___— •_•. _• 'satkfactory leacher and the 1(evil•w are+ sego rat rrl through the O ,51ON IH.D 1'1•;UI'LI2 BV "THE ,y'INOS THEIR �w•ishes her success In her litrrtra- Tile ypuug wife. N +'r'r'•." r REVELS KEEP.", Work" The cicrigyn,an 1I•I:n- had !tire of marrying Ihenl Is • _ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH --=cl,.rgyntau tu-o!yielal., ;at I F \\"ar:!.•.. to J' Great 3amage to the Waterfront. HOLDS ANNUAL MEETING y of today. I hold in n,h: L. �dm vnui.'s"s a, - AND ELECTS OFFICERSre use 'which author! crd me 7 aunt hnx made a ,n.. ,•,err "J_ •Slat' i them. v:ilh Inn one rr,•iut: H iq '.I� 3( The northwest wind ushered In the' Tho annual ronfere•nrc• of Tile First; 9•h.• 6ridr• U a -,id'. ❑ Fuld I., an in, :!r lax, .y` I 'w w-:u yulnlg, , New Year and by >,,rt•n a. Ili. that .Pa list Cjolrc•ll of F(bablids was he1.1' with e: eery 1' bealrhy, a a hn h ,n I:: ip+n r•�-, _ !till morning was sweephi Ihinla aY !111 'thi.; week. IV. S_ Laney was.elecD•d.. fa cnraUdr of ! pe old p•• •lo, •e a,� . •.� - I.nul pro=peel rate of :i xt;• wiles an hour. All over Smda}- Rcbool suporlhrendcnl, and.lna, :md iulp(ry life. tCr y.r �_ Ih•rs of alit- ollil!l:nns !u,! •'1 _ - •• !� X'+'' _ and ne•:Ir \'nest Sound ,gas it, ir!Il u. •'•l r.� William Gre,- as,sI slant Al r. pardeipaa!s lit Ibeir rem i ., Ills f�l••:, Ii;al lit.• : � .. .. .l _ !� �. 'jy!" 'William Green and .11r, \t'. S.A.anev• crrr Ir;-. .Ica. rc• drliehlyd, hi:r::nse ,t•r �( LI nl1,. It It. a Ilia•! air woolen: n ti,".>+ .�(. '"=.:# �, i Y% -;,vd ..yy -wcr.• c•huaou lu assist Deacon, Ch,•at. Th,• I. wan :I ;vcthin5 runts of isfic-d :it our own minds Ilia '' ` LLJ f ;4••-•are p,al 'ho :Irlic,. Lrfil,;i""- 1.+(<..` !.'+'1� �, 11!Im- Suss G,illm II'aS allp.,litle•,1 Ifa-ai- alre:sly- united Ihem and ll y� ,..'. I., Inal:e Ulcir dcrl!ci::.'_ ye; vr' �'"` .-• ,v!: i!,- acre.=. !'•,w boats or aw:!uor: ,,i ry•r of the cherrb;'and \Y. S. L:me},„or :.::.•rvi, .• ntr,n•. I i .!�•a sans ::. !'u>"iI•Ir, :Ipd h•• nv. •;� ! r. h' �+ ! nlere!y -rrlauPre3 e. a :nui worst lit chose as-i for rlrrk. •II:aIn in IL•e lest. Lund; of r�, :! ,mw who i•: :,LL• I„ inly ;1: t f, r& _ +: }�•• �� eh.lred :'1 Ihr due•k aid on w;i(i,rl n,n!; teed. J. .1. I'ayil'n r, till pa s'ur, ha. 1411. �r.:y L-b-n.!,. it is "ouid-1;!:tell\' de' �.I f•II �' T. 'Inlo—1 to Edrllrind.. fnim Sedttl••, and wr(_ •.e r-k,•d :col snot:. S_'I':IyIrir's •'iL•r unexprru-d ::1 w.Irs 'tit, (.y p,l r;•air„ \aid :I-: I'Arl of I!,•- - rhnrrh rc;rijrl-K lu 1raYe llifu p:akc.'\'�hirh of all its who ;:hew ,jI !auu,-h. ' :!dory •. in whit'll •h:.d just - (II _ ❑,• ete would Lay., the r.•;Irn:n!� ry n, nvn" _•-gq t� � r' Guru,• :Ill:eng Ulrai. -«•�w -- - - Y.._.r•[. nets 1•,•fsq:,.y tit w.•R colic hc••!j itr; :e:; rspca;ir.• rngin••• •!'.via „ ha!CT.1rr nu•s In snrh n••urlun. ." �.!!rd new nivinbers-joined the fit" 0 I 9'(i.ay d Ilyd what laths; CITY LIFC DRAWS FARM 111. Ihar IL-,•>• wi:;h; Ira c,•! :wJ ,Nit - s"Olri. ! It's Iu rcc•u,'r :•,d and rr-;and the Inrm Ucrnhip now stands 27. a ,-, of iuu•roM1t .old r,.lanv,-:.•:u a. ._ DWELLERS. ip;,Ir.,d, Iliay- rn:dd h;Ive L•a pponi•d? represt•hi!n. li fa Rlilles' r.levllnn come, 41, Ito, Im a 11ai "•I QIia" Ili 11 .1 lrrr7rt�[7.rt Wen Ile Ca n -- s rr • ••.• The it•Irh ••..„�...tpyy,,.. .,.. T. t,...., spree d-•11`tly-ill-them!-slot-4h.•-+,ail. nsumrrs y all the rnlnrma-1: !I uu. lit.- lhal. 'Lumber ru:upnuy':, III:o u••,v uu.l ur Cease to be ...!�Irudlei 1'!''.I:11•ss and hupvd !1!e ur•u' United 51a1es Will So<'.n ,,•rev o-r,•nis Lr be It 16r Wo os,able I.. car,- tI„•rn "I'h.• Id• -a; ;bm.1 1!: n!. ..silo• !non. The q'nshlnt: rchuu•h b.lildin;: will be cuul!dclyd all i L„porling N..tirn. I.•xl, 'Known un Ll Ilod alo! ......n,`.Idrd Id'•.IL., :l!Ir!II I..II nil iln:l ail e,:! .: IIiII ,t. U. Sll!:I:IIII!•rl !lilt ll,l!t wel•kN DIlls. -' _ "._ Ili, It Uflly, ills :l':lya are !la •• wIt f)-:Ire If.n!;!11!;•inf :1:1 119.1.'R '�y,nill,11l:1 all, .t 1. e. '�5.—"1'rl•til'lll ld L-h,l„',:•. !ilk' �!�.: 119 tlf lull' approm—ll tat lilt',• will un•rt with popular sn pporitprhM!r fur farm prWac!s hate CURIO: -w•a.:. :w'rpt nut. ...\Lath- boll QUARTERLY MEETING...... 4nt. ----•.- •-.-•--•_----- _ u;;hou L..,-tit.• ror.olry-.--Sul[au,ln suly: the rural population is play -!cribs we- -rokon :old driven ashore- FREE METHODIST CHURCHt It has been most unfonl F'rirnd has '" - ;in oar talc present rrusns, If it C'Ia9•�Pa119111g I:-ca[ loss to the mills. Then - lour Sister and b - I i The f2unrlert M"-flag of the Frre, away front her young hu Ihr• milurnrprarnlyd villakes aslRrndy' na!•1 lost all to l!00t1 is hallo:• y 11a_Iteflew�;udrx_Jl r...U•7 rnrrjy.I".'•s_• sooner--Those-who-were :,her h •, It !x rdy:ht s.a n'ui}eiI! [air �rux•na, Ir.11fcliuu• hi+sy1�-C!) and ":� 1! Ilisig wa: li[nlLca and mlrjllacrd:'Th!'"�1"[hollfa[•elslrch-will -}te krld •3ao.. Gtit, I' 1 I thnate friends and contpa! y I l"•r cent. of tin• hr,y+nlalinn as living In mlfli valid f.,xlarles, la [act the• rntln!l7fh as f!Silowg; I venmils; who roil lint pl'nvtdy suffered. The damage' NJ Pr[,nehing, Friday eve. 7.30; 3ltitlr+ 'ter to her bereaved husband liu•nt9(3ver. Many n IIh• wmsfel �\lawns;' ttrctan d Aepreiivatnllre l w'atcrfrna'. day S•3d:. $uuday Love c-"is and relatives war ml ICllu'ip CI.Irk .d ]lls>aar!, mirmrily esiltusted nt II5.00V Fee the lirst P= m•. a. m., levatrd to [he zonT-)vnrk of h.•1- fean('"I kiS; EttnncldnC It a. .'pithy and sincere Christian I leader in trig tlnnse, irehty. "+7i' the limp In "0 year$ the sprnr Inslud I ail 17tunnnl[y wore (Inc •anitie!'.y , (present rate, In _!) year- the Unitedlover the duek and dashed the win]l'rearldng also, 7.30 It- m• wishes." strain ithout- future inateriali I j lje., C.�F �lrftcyatildfl. DIs[r3Ct F.1d• Th gs n'mofl,tl, Slates will c•enae it, be an expor(Ing[dow•s of the walting room. °'9 ex-; Mes9a91it w-err. sent to srrernl:er will be Ire charge, ill are cri[dhlly c , e loop( Packet 82 t Pg. 2 • nation for agricultural prndllCta, -"—_------: as to ce(uln." 1stertnler rrnnpaale9 that landipgs+lnvltni Ie nticad. loon ... .^� _ FOR -:RENT -.--Furnished Room. We aregiving it away toprove l r-- - Apply, 'tribune Office. 4111. that its the best in the world � W that's t:rd-nd•Ilttd':; Ullintl`IIe t, Ilse I �iat NecessaryMao W.V. i'harlcs F (-doll attended J p:un rurclsf tltt�t:•urUt ••free flwnt; jjT ,a meeting or the Ministerial , alchoh.1, absolutely non-poisstl- E YY (�, � —for the thinking man —for the prof. � a Association. at Ep-. rctt, lkmday ous. [;nt a fry bottle al au}' E°r t� Your Trade - ie busy business man Drug store, it's warranted.family; In SIIgIt, it's for Y/ 1'he Coterie Ciuh met with; �Otf. Mrs. A. Ili Curlisthisafternrhln. [ The member, hay,- taken up the AIr. and Alrs.'L. 1T. \iorchr:nsc'� You r"""e"°"" S l]t'l�r•hf lnhns t�:l•'y-lr--_ _ ''r + --_--- pvho last ye:u• bmrj;ht fn•(- a:•:es: �%aI2t- O Kl 1 •, ' The F;dnlonds''' Athletic -club{ in South Edmonds, have he en j �1 25 cents loclkii g over -their fill(- prope•'t.% jryg to has just insL'llled __1 �u•w and up-� Goods per copy' to- 1:11c Locker; for u.se of those and have dec ided to ivake a Inane! 11 C peho retluire to mal'o a chant (-of on it as soon as he call ,ell tis� 1 1WAW confe,-tionery hn.;iness 1.n Fi .t Edmonds Market clot ) hing at the hall. •--- 1 i�yN - _._ avontle, Seattle. - J. N. Otto, Prop. W f+4� 9- ckage Cos. lue 48' _Ms of al ,mcr- 40tf. It and .-lI'ly, torch Ipper -Lt, a �Lball -cam, 19. sfor- :ping :left Cut- :)r all iruh- lash. i fica- r the I by tti fi Invil2lions h:tvo hi'tm is.vued for a d;IHC0 to b1• :JVVII on Satur- day evening. I--'hruary 20. at Alhletic Club ::tiilding. The :llrnir is given icy a number .If young ladiesirf the Cily, and is complimentary bt Mr. and ,Mrs. 0. K. 111owat. Dr. 1V. M. Brittain; wife and five children artiyed - unda�, from Neola, K:ur;:u,. and is -look ing for :t residence to -day, with the expectation of locating in Edmonds. Aft.,r regaining his Health iii our d•!lil;hiful cliffi-atO the doctor will practice liis-pro- fession here_—_-�_ John Paige. %vho has been spending the pa,t three months in Eastern Canada visiting boy- hood friends, and relatives, rem turned --to Edmonds, Tuesday. Mr. Paige says they have had a beautiful winter bate]( there and that he -had a, f:ne_vi;it, but -- Edmonds for him. .i,.... Fitiirft � Ifrt+rmg -has. dr:6i•n quite heavily upon this conunun- ity for jurors for the February term of the Superior Court. The following niunes appearpn the list: E. AI, Alled, F. C. Mils- paugh and A. AL ,Yb t.for Ed- monds, and Arthur Wigill and Wm. Yates for Richmond pre - icing - — Mes- Tne Civic Leaguc has arranged e iri a Mass Fleeting forSunday even treet ing next, in the Athletic -Club will building, 'at 7.30.- G. A. Sweet FOR SALE. ILhodo Island Red eggs. 07 perhundred, and day old (-irides 121cents each. Edn-: mds,-11'ash. IOIL5: 11r. and Mrs. V-111:lgrr and —son or Anacort•cs. 1:ayc- recently lal:en np their 1-- idcnce in this conuuunil r, octal ;; int( the friedt home SOU Ille 1titOf thiSCitV. ]fir, and Mrs. M. S. Crain of Neola. ' Kansas, are,looking over Edmonds with a view of locating. !fir. Crain is a brother of Airs. J. IZ. Carrico. ale is it lumber- man. Dear Editor. - Will }nu all pn 1 your ot,y. ale space to expmss Illy since T i J. R. Carrico, ihanlcs to the people of Edolurnlsl who have givon,us good n ill ardl E,lotda Wash. substantial help in building curl new church edifice. • It hats hecn' lionat;v sole lions by hiss Anna yel_v cncour:III and much :rl-i Alel-adden, an elocutionist of predated. We are getting ou much merit from Everett. very well and with a littlegener- al aid and a good deal speciI The Mountaineers are Coming. aid %ve shall finish the house cvilh _ very little debt upon it. 1Lre w_ 1. Members of the Seattle Moun- taineer most gladly welcome ally done Club will start their an- 'tiekn1 {la+wpver small it may b-�. nual walks on Sunday, March G. There pw:ly a how. company of Thirty to fifty of them will come' gathered folks and their friends to Edmonds on that day for a gathered at the.hmne of -the -pas- bid` ebicken dinner, Remember- tor-Saturda-t'_niidtt..stttd_t V.V_ri irr� tl - le¢ee{tent tlnlity of the_ interesting surprise party. It} Edmonds fowl, the leader, Thos. plea an alccTssion of joy and J. Church, has written Mrs. Han- giftsagain and presents trade our g` prepared for heart, hopes and will longbe tc_,themagwdhome-cooked chicken membered. Every pastor shout 1: (]inner, The price limit is 50 cts. have such rich experiences of r•_- each. The party can be inspired liginii. IIc can smile under (_Illy a good dinner.to-_boost- for culiar burdens and trials pvlur r 'Edmonds. Who will prepare it? I gets a good pounding. FFICIAL 1'UIILICAT3UN,.... _ ' 1Vc paill hold scr+•ice., in out new church Sunday the 20th ins:.f the nn.nel.l e.ndiel.. or. vand we Q.xtelld a welcome iuvit:.Bank- of --- 4ralllnlillfs tion to Lho people of Eilluonds 11 .loin in with its to worship Lht' h+ond.t Khn,n,a..swtoof w..hiwt....l. th. U.a! r1f .buxlnexe on the al., d.Y of Jed lum King of Kings. vscF� For xeeeral mfriiths %cc have r.w>,..n.iiuu..rec.....................sa:fel is used the hall 'over Air. Engel% o,•enlr.n............................... tat st Ito.d.....rr.nt. and other x ritie..... 17GIG, I7 store for our meetings and wI It.nkinlrh.ua., rnruitur..nd fi s. <.... w:_o ro desire tothankhimfor this splen- O1her-1"es.,e—red ................. sp0000 :fo.• mint Lank.....:,........... . ... I IhS9 Gfi slid aceommodation. This free C'heri... I uth�r hank. alai usher e;.% gift will long be remembered by tl..................... ......:.......... zs_ 70 l:.ch-oxv let dradna h.u".............. our little church and friends. c..hanheae............. ................ Gsssss With Heat wishes, am A cere•• rohJ...... ..... .........:..... 11395518 ly yours. �� ft LIABILITIES iI. J. I'ayseur, YABtor, aplt.l a.ckI id in..' ................. It 2500a In lumber - (,it The concert given by the I.:V_ erect artists, Aiiss Anna Mel"a,d-! rl�t), t.rLurics: hiisa 11.1ry AlcF;d-� dell". pianisL : and. Mr. Clifford Ronrl, vtwnlisl, ,tax %wry piss 11' allcndt•d. ArI ill nsn:dlt• the e11.19.1 when._only..t1. few turn orlt .thei program icon oxcepliowill�• line,. Hiss Anna McFadden hcing the favorite. - 111iss 11cFarldrn +cos in Lire city esl(-rd:ty :old made! arrangements to orgaltirc a cLl;rjIj in elocution and physical cultw•c.l Baptist Items $10.0 A WEEK makes the path clear for putting a VICTOR Into -every--home, . Why not see 11b 'au a I I.1 ! u r evre�vv of RI first, urctl:sc iI is ■ necr Arty—I;hal is of men and all - 61� "Ttlle-tn ituakarine buying of Ara- Shaw. In his sod minis iu ldicclual aristocracy. It u w p,og".-of III it.'ialwns.adr In dirt. huay bul;oru cartoon hulary t Irian, who snttsl kcelr abreast ul die tunt_s, heca4f it givd hidctlte'reof reviewe;Ahe gu news of the dry in concise, readahle has appeared in brut; it is invalaaitlo la the chinking d newspapers and newa and new mtu, afro demands only the .loth sketch lwA "ica draws his own conclusions~ articles on the al because it gives lion just plain, the day. Autho 5,wit'hf facts. • •• --- lamely and very Q It is helpful to the whole family. ';i's a liberal ed lu it you will find a monthly picture subscribers ecpre OUR ,1909-10 CATALOGUE A ■II A—de.11 mACariltet IS, ■ -Inmey.Wei. You u41 . yt•.r .. itl—I W: seriat' i. If yttu Fitrnyue ruprrinr agener tnihia:.m m.g.riue r.Ioa for It. lewai d.lkrti writ far a—�tod& The Review of Reviews Company, _ How Do Your -Shoes Lof �'°, After Three -Months' l Wear tme Tara--r rt3kr rsa They will ootlook like Ihafoo the right If They h, 64GITCHE GAM "Gitche Gamec" Shoes are trade t and hold their shape. The best of is _.0c.licst_of-workmanship have gone i Long -process tanned soles and one-p (-matters and toe -boxes of stout, ho =- -leather- They -will %year out EVI: part will izo first —that acids ntrnith time of service. Let it, sell you. C will-INTAKE--GOOD-and you ahem al%vays. i iade in all - - styles at ••.•.-..-..•... ... -- • . • • I (Made by the Northern Shoe Ca or Du1.11,1 GO,TO KI•NGDOIM BIG .1149' —M. V, Packet Pg. 283 1 t31,t1Afr�1.". ]�UAi ilia: if l� FDAICNDS, SNOLION151D CO.,, WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JULY 14,1910. PAYSEUR CAN NO LONGER PURSUE HER Court Names Mr. Brady is Guardian for Mrs. Ervay --Much Money Has Mysteritil ly Disappeared The ending of the heariev Al invi•slirntiun by re sal ivcs. —1�;Pi�r�•tt-ll itlr-dat'; irrn•hick .Inmc�--Suit--fnllawcd��the__11iU�_irOrr I: rally of this Oily svn> n:uned as fn1l11f1 t:niliv mud rorved to milli guurdiun for Mrs. Harriet Ervuy.'rt'slitntinn, which !vas acwtrll closes a long meal qunrrel in3t plinlwd ill' the she rill', 'do ml which an es-ministoruf the limp-L llillitcrly -ti5rellat•ell and All'.. EYVny Wel" then on'ned by tl±t- llillg. 1. the elg^.}rere, lief Rand in wilichI ''his episode `esused lilt- rel :he cougeev:alion of tilt- claurh ;Hives of Mlrs, sir:a,>, r peeinlh and mnnylliher ciliyr;nn 11h;011C]"l •r.+on-in-I;tw, Rrwin ChMe, t. mart." less involved I:rep :In err nut rnr a simile, •1'be lehnle vn.•+r n• " upau Iho srhvnir In hr spru ul, hp .vnn,rnur encss of a sc•nlii„cntal, lyanl- else. Su rhea the "Her." 1'n} irn's heart and the r-upidity, ini--sour showed up in town :dnnd Ili alily mill grrrd i.f it nlini.alrr tlu• first or last Scplr•mhor hurl who, far Llic purpose of �dunder. iuuucdi:Holy berr:ur In pay esprc•. Triliuue•Recicn's ll'euderbd Alining Nwires of the ec•Rererend I'apetir - - Ufa working Prnot Anuclpatiun ••'rhnt was tinny•' l•. Lt� f.nnking for,A1M,1her '/Lonk advantage of a wonn l'sI isl attention to the 91)il'Itllnl Wel- v. Well1known wvokltLmll furlipirillial' fare of Mrs. Ervay, Alr. L•'llast., inrorrnrllion. began to look ' little clueel}. { itrhiIc th,sµilitmtreally tmgun 'fhe first thing Lhatlooked funny becaus4 of the dattlter, as Claim- to Al r. Chase was, that la scut., f ell in the cor ldulnt, that Rev: { in an attempt to overcome Mrs. Tayseor would Induce SSre. Ervay i Ervay's objections to joining the to sign $verto liar Miller weattll, I Baptist church, advanced the µMich ix sjALed to he in the•cmious inrormation that Abe nefgilhlrr'hwxl of W.OIX;, n h'i� could join the Bnptists and still ]fiipltK lad Ir:uts Bret pr¢v LWAY, renmhl a spiritualist. This ,truck pHaL had ttmdc l lu• near +-datives{ Mr. Chase its so I)Mllinr it psy- or At". Ervay watchful rind sax- chologieal phenomenon that Ile piciaus ar Ruch possibilities. - 'i at once proceeded to indite the SE 131tvlieve,I at tf,e "Ret:'rj following questions, ,Which he. Po]'seirr. lviiu, iucidentapy was sent to forty-two 13nplis[ preaell- awnaLixtw rySd rouriil guilty offers in Seattle, Tacoma and Sno- immorality and worse by LlieI homish county: Baptist mission board at Seattle - 1; Does the Saptl ttehurch tnfer- and spelled from the cliurch,�ate ornfliE(Alto with spiritualists? had heard of how easily an alleg-I 2 Can a apirl[nrdlst mraium ell spiri(unlist medium• of Ed-1Uli ncl a member ar tlm nikiltlat moods h;,d gotten hold of ,lineelrrh without first renoudcing i; 'non, `Mrs. Ervay's money, ,and xpirittlalimn and corl to hold thought there might be . some Seances? k tasy°rriortey for him.. fa lima Mr. Chase recaivell It will be remembered that in thirty-six nimwera to the queries.i May, 1906, Mrs. 'F,rvay began) Dail nit but two of those replying suit to recover from A. E. Hills had agletd emphatically that one and wife some ;2,W6 which toe{could not be both a afdril4pli4L� it latter couple hn�gniten from rnd A hill lnnrtmuch its 0 Mre. Ervay oil one plea or anoth-IiptriluulistSl do lint phtee niµchl 1¢�1 er,,but mostly on the argument credurl on a pursolml Cod line}+ it , all in nnnrlh-1 hell i! VAIRUK ox -lip {1 ing and same reel MAN, but HINDER PURSUE IlLE tlsrre filtpemrl in he un ul'gtynirJL• [C,n,tluuc,l Gn,n hit..+t t'nu�'l II lion litAHS011tr OWncl Ili p. 'There duzeus ur gaol honest p• ilsit,• ---"T�._• Over, in spite of thvrte it.m. m, -I'rmm'ur's „f the Ltaptist fuith and site,• • rl,nll a re • t hey- It dve d lrzy'neur rnnvinred Airs 1':rvay,•,nttem pted II, hntO Like ul-g4itli- till, it renild In• 4une. nml It wml. Yrltinrl put ml ila feet and given 1mL Inns; hefureAtr. Iarray hey;llni new 11fl.. In this ntlemPt thej' In givr mnncy in the shape of liars• wrhLeit to di Re.%-vt prumi. phtw i;a Ln Ira yaeu r• nn t114 let t er'a, nenl men i n t lu•irehin•rh m*8cat. Illicit [lot it lilt ritt'llcal in church -i th• and elgo,,vb '. but LItere is n work- A t:llnntslt, at Al: CAto'N fgvlins; that if in lu 1'ayni!ur poreonnllym attempted it should bt- tnW"lllH that it a-ae to be used fur a par- an entirely new orl.'aulaatinil. sonege and ou, automobile worth In n letter writden b}' till i{ev- Aro) wni sold b, raise funds. far Edwin S. Doyle, rn tar „f the •1 c r'�- i1T1 Inrili ing, IYho sold it, f'oltnikilia Huptinl c'hun•h of tirat. Iro,v,-vcr. and wl,rrt the Inculey t e_ itrnn wrr ton rr'plu'.;I Par WPIll ta, l$ 'itn51rrC ar lass Unger- pr • 1 +.... WUM—Cmulk Loin point, Otto lndny, kumeu rOvernn4)Grulirmnn lava: Ua April It Sirs. Ervayy and ' a fin' as I nil cvrntwrn�nl Fwr• I'n}xvur_ Ihr halt•rhaving nrt. ynnnlly. 1 would not Wuslt, Inv lv-s Iv ul+nndnnc,I one nI the iliac with the nrgau{xrliun•ttAit nice:+L litllr +v'nnun in ll norld. li-.n• ldarutl. If fair gvnornF enim- and Ial;iug tern of t11v thl'va litUO AImnari, 9,4^c Fit Inl,-r au b, hay.- hoyxnr I5 hich.h.• wila tile rilr, our Itelmnihlnplis atltmmpt In get 1•:Ll on a trig* rn:=t. There is all is llpltiny in Edlpa;ul :.,_wl'11 .and gnestiu+ but that Alrs.. F'rvay finvrrl, bu1'a-iilSeitlilkt'i'ac':trsri 6111liAwd the raoney fortilr trip. ra,t Make PI) nusch Ill in":I Finally Mr. Cl me recelted -m Iltllrr town Lhat it wtndd tnke hint or tilt. wn� his mnprcr•itt- vtgtrli of Atnigglt- to Uvorcodiv. Ina• tr:+% di9d,•u„y: her liltle for. and .1 mnn Octnlll do fur hellcrt,t uiuv, inn! 1— L.„I Boar. Iir W-"It hueiil n•clrk where• ilhag o ehaliec I+r,l Judga Illicit kit livvtrL1 far its life, f¢Ilr,e' like i'>t}'- anil yucereut•d in ¢ellirlf, an in, our ran lilt our r1 utuuinntlrm j rrnt•IP111 1',•sLillining, the tin lilt Inlrre Karol lit oni' veAr VIArl tell fl++lit [l,urxrlug ruts�• denlmuis or 4.opd nlrn cutllll overil in it - Air+. Krr�n1f's untdl the gnextilgl p dee.,, erui lit a [ 1ta'yl lilt for ht'r hlut liuvil iln[11 lil rn, F:rtat' and the meal sel3l c•ll. 'l•Itc injunction wan ho L of 1[u- Ili pt iA vltunll her.• i>sxoul atilt -ami upplieli jn5t in wb,.lr Irtv1• Ihc• atatl':+I lsira :lair Elkprcrt-nt the' withdrntc'nl fir the Trit,aue-1 tvvivw Iw like of smug $ Li;119, which tholtl:h a vieli+nixing they 11avr Freciwai Illdollar or sf ry mo+-e th:ut the I,a[• Ike hnurin of sorb n rawal ill ance to lter recount, might have scotmdrel fix the llntl;Ng. of fhe 1n'crl itairl without qurstfan if It atianinnnrybnttrd 0f,Scntpt•-tirw;- hull not A¢en'll tiro initlnetioll, Orl i+ayfrµr Ill be, At the trial hialtiy 6II•s. Er- Mr._EhoskrJ:tlrns thltt i'Ayse9r cat- ndmitteJ that she had paid had altsnlutc rf+nrysr f,7.11i-`l:rr. . nil raver RW aft pa}'xeur s re P-L vay'0 rtifiliriL for tilt' iW%C nine ronen[ntidil? -" other e0derice tnuntlis ttrld !lint �of Iter l'rtwtd Ihat tiv-10 3l allo- money hay unaceonn a v cal frr Lher lunl v'nn[.elu•d, -s k it7it'rr npli mired in lhnl timil, tint• to •,r Itnn- illlx I•;nnrvemdd k%otn;I}': mention the pl'orel lls fraul thu ;c'3'+tlU wm all she Sould call Ln >zl[r of [he aulnnulbili,, Mr. ilstifif7- an jfltnnlinll, Will at once Itrrenxtilirlr, - A [reculinr Lunt to alfalfa was lr ivnmililka W%c-H ign• .nmil nt the clove of the raoe t[on to detet'ntine What became when bath the LlIll s. • the • Spirit- of the money anti who got it. Oldists before referred to, and tvlist Iiod4"11 culled ns wltilsill Ayrnpnt[1i:ed trill+ Mrs. Envoy Mrs. II h illrew her nuns nroltnd Sltr, h:rc•a}• null kissril her. while Air. FIN; ahlwk I y,uls with 1wr nncl looked as if he was about to ;rry, With Nlr, Brady Aa guard- iun, rtn}' :'medium" fir itinerant tvha wanll to rlr"l grcacher 'w a .little ewky money Irnm the Ervay wealth trill have to go some. Judge Rlack, in grnntinlr the i request for the af,lloin[menl or L ,guarilian. said thaLstich appoint- alentshOl ld not Ili filly way mean {Ihat Mr+. Frvay was of unsound mind. The evidence submitted, however, proved that when strongly approached on religious and sentimental grounds Alri.. • Ervay' to ly became induced to put with her money. if made to hello•, tl:a money wrls to be used to further Lhose religious dr sen- timental ideas_ As a result of the mfildonce or h he has been cc we -and eleewhe oTf�nniznVan kilo •Hrl'C Is a 01ur6 Packet Pg. 284 IMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, F'RIDAY,I at :d- •ut ch he :r, at ps ,w of re n- at a d- •d ro r- rc To Erect Radidl Plan. Baseball Station Hi6re Trans - Pacific Telegraph Receiver to be Installed East of Edmonds Team Here Players Asked to Turn Out for First Practice oil Sunday Afternoon Edmonds will 'have a baseball team this year - A meeting at tie cltyhall Wednes- day evening brought out a number or enthualmltic players, anti an A re- nult a call has been Issued for the first turnout Sunday afternoon at one O'clock ELL the city park.. So If you ever played thin great American game, get out the old glove and show up at the park'Sun- day afternoon. C, 11. Blenz, Andy Lorentzen and Cu.! Swanson were named an an or- ganization committee. The election of officers and ' completion of th[- organization was deferred until r future meeting. MRS. ADA HARRIS PASSES AWAY Following an illness of two we, Vt duration, hire. Ada M, Fbarrla passed L, LEGION POST AIDS away early Tuesday morning at the residence of her daughter, Mrs. T. J. BOY SCOUT DRIVE Murphy, with whom she had made Franit Freese Point, American Le- her home for ten years. She had been confined to her home with heart gioo, aponeore of the Edmonds Boy. trouble since last September. Scouts, has made a generous contrd- ,Mrs. Harris had been a resident or button as an organization and is as- Edmonds for nine years, previous to Slating in raising a portion of the which time she had resided In Seattle j5.4,85Q_•hu0Zet of the Seattle dhl- ro{ marry yens. S11c was barn le. Lrict for the ,purchase and-eghtptlsen I.eulaiaaa, Mlasourl,'October•12. 1"". of summer camp sites for the Boy During her earlier life, she was a t_ rcout2- of the district which Includes teacher for a number of yearn in the Edmonds, high. acl)ool of Omaha, Nebraska, :S Duringthe past ten years the only where she was married, In 1884, to addltlons to scout camp property In" Arthur Carter Harris. In 1801, she the district have been two small cab- moved with her family to South Ins. With the tremendous growth lu I Bend, Washington. There also she s membership more camp sites and was an oclated with educational ,f equlpmeni-Are urgently needed, and work and waa county superintendent ,f Lb" campaign was instituted to pre- of schools of Pacific vide them. county for two y terms Immediately before her re - By assisting 1n the ra¢.;�aign herd, moval to Seattle, in 1001. _ these facilities will be placed at the She is survived by her husband, disposal of the 'Edmonds Scouts her three children, Mrs. David Wil- f along with the ofhrrx. makipg L* son of Santa Cruz, California, who s local efforts truly worth while. " had coma up to he with her In her u_ 'Those desiring to contribute to the Itlnems, Arthur O. Harris. of Seattle. y ftind, In which poymenrs may 11e and W'm T. J. Murphy. ❑f.this city; made at once or quarterly tlltvug'tI. and yy three gMpdaana, Jet" Barrie 2, obit thin year. may do as through the .Wtizon. Richard Iiarrls 'Sxarphy. an<. local committee. -•Otto N. •Scfearrrefl. hptiert Alrey Fiords. The eldeot of ll,nd Frank Ktagdan. or the Scout- a fgmlly of ten rhtldrea, alto is ■uf- y roaster, Dr. Harry 14. K—Wer. vivcd by only two slaters, Mrs- T. J. c k CallCornla 1 3 1 r Purchase of about 15 acres of land east of Edmonds by Heintz & Kauf- man, Ltd., for a radio telegraph re- ceiving station has just been madq public. The tract Igo located about a quar- ter of a mile west of the new state 'Ighway, midway between the Seat. tle Heights and Alderwood MnnoC reads. The purpose of the plant will be for commercial radio telegraph re- :cpflon acroaa the Pacific Occan, and ultamatic typewriter receiving equlpt nent will bO used. - Arrangements are being completed with the Edmonds Independent Tale- phone.company for a connecting clr� .ult through the local exchange from ieattle to the radio station, . for which a special copper circuit will be required. The plant to to be In operation by April 30. RELATIVE OF LOCAL MAN DIES SUDDENLY G. A- Carlatedt received unexpec- ted news on Monday of the death of his brother-in-law, John Larson of Seattle. Mr. Larson won a building con- tractor, and was busily employed at the time of his sudden death- -Funeral services were held yester- day afternoon at two o'clock from the Ericson Mortuary and interment was made In Washellt cemetery. Besides the widow, Mrs. FT.dra Larson, ,siater of Mr. Carlatedt, there are left a son. flarotd A., and three• daughters. Elan. A_. Helen Id. and Betty Loulne„ all of fi.attle. oaumand, of Hyde Par , and Mrs. Lulu Stark, of LOulslana, Missouri. FUaera] services were bold at Bent- ury-WAtaon's Ia Seattle, at One o'clock 'Thursday afternoon, with Dr. McLaughlin. of SL Mark's Ppincopal Church, officiating. According to We preference of Mrs. Harris, cre- maLlan ensued, which will be fotlow- ed by Interment in Acncla Mernorlltl Park. MOUNTAINEERS ENTERTAIN The Mountaineers, boys' club di- rected by Rev. J. H. Berringer, en- tertained members of the Mwants club and several of their fathers at thelr club room Saturday evening. Many Tributes°Paid at Funeral 6.1.f VV_� WV, V + 1 s & 300 CHICKS LOST IN ALDERWOOD BLAZE The Edfnonda Volunteer Fire De- partment made •a' quick run to Alder - wood Manor Wednesday afternoon, shortly after four o'clock In response to an alarm for fire. A brooder house and 300 little chicks belonging to a chicken rancher living about one and one half miles cast of Al- derwood were destroyed by the blaze. About 1500 • chicks were In the building when the fire broke out of whlcy, 1200 were saved from the flames. KIWANIANS HEAR BUSINESS TALK John E. Yost. manager of A. M. Yost and -Sons, lumber and building material dealers, was the principal speaker -at the meeting of the Ed- monds Klwanls club at the Eagle Cafe, Wednesday evening. Mr. Yoal told of the changes that have taken place In uib building ma- terial business during the 21 years his firm han been In business, as well as the fluctuating trade condi- Llor>,a and prospects for the ensuing year. Harry M. Miller, vice-president of the club, spoke briefly on Improve- ments now under way in the Wood - way Park dlstrlct, and urged that greater publicity be given to this nectlon as a desirable home com- munity. Ray V. Cloud npoke briefly on Klwanls objectives. Will Dedicate Ba tist Church Prominent Ministers and Laymen Will Assist.- in Ceremonies Sunday NUMBER 13. Chamber Goes V1Sltmg Richmond Highlands Is Host at Monthly Dinner Tuesday Evening The Rlcllmond Hlghlaflds common - fly was host to the Edmonds Cham- fer of Commerce at a dinner and program Tuesday evening at the M. F,, Church dining room. The dinner was served by the La- dles Aid of the church. The Ed- monds and Richmond Highlands peo- ple attending the affair filled the roost Illmoat Ln-'Capacity,-- Fred W. Strang, member of the Strang g Prosscr Advcrtlaing'Agency and prominent In at)-nitlo Chamber of Commerce activities, was the principal speaker. Mr. Strang apoke entlulslastically of the future or file (IbIrlet embruc•- Ing Richmond Fllghlam's, Rlchmoncl Beach and Edmonds• declaring this to he the Ideal home section of the Puget Sound countrv. He stressed the Ideal [lunatic cuodillona, the un- exceflcd view of Sound wind moun- taillm, the beautiful sunsets, the splendid highways and the proximity to Seattle as points In favor of thin district as a residence section. Mr. Strang expresaed the sincere Interest of the Seattle Chamber of Commerce In the, welfare of the North End, and Invited our people to call upon that organization for Co- operation desired In any of Its sev- eral phases of activity In Northwest development. An able.. addresa of welcome by Jr U, Case" opened the program.__... J. B. Burke,'also a prominent mem- ber of the Seattle Chamber, and n resident of Richmond Highlands, spoke briefly, cnmpilmenling the communities upon holding such a joint meetleg. F,nlertalnment numhsrs Included a vocal molt) by W. F, Paull of Rich- mond Highlands, reading by Mrs. Caskcy of itichmond Beach, plane solo by Miss Lain Deland, and vocal solom by Joe Harper. accompanied by Thomas Scanlon, all of Edmonds. Community singing was led by Harry De Land, mong leader and pro- gram chairman of the Chamber. The hnvOCRtlon wan pronounced by Rev. Callahan, pastor of the church where the meeting was held, IS STUDENT EDITOR OF NEWSPAPER' Mine Virginia Friese of F,dmonds, veman's etiltor of the Ilnlveralty of rVashinglon Dully, and asaociate ed.• for of Tyee, atudant. yearbook, will, his week,• naslst In editing the ledro-Woullry C'nurlvr Tlmce. Mina rriese is it nn•mhe rof Theta Slgmn 'hl, it woniefi'm national journallatic iororlty-. OBSERVES 80111 BIRTHDAY Thin Hcalli Benuty and Barber shops were closed all day Tuesday, AUXILIARY ANNOUNCES when-ltfr. nod lira. 1C. L. Reat11 de — BRIDGE LUNCHEON voted the (lay to the pleasure and entertainment of Mr_ Healli m mother, The Legion Auxiliary to Frank Mrs. Clara Rnth..Heath, Ilse occlislon Freese Post, announces the third of being her aalh hirChchtp. A aiotnr• _ — a series of bridge luncheons, to be trip and birthday dinner In Seattle held Wednesday afternoon, April 2 were featgrps of ; the din at one o'clock, at the 1. O_ O. F: } Packet Pg. 285 hall. This affair is open V o Ne ,pub- i . C uv noel „n wan wish rt. I ANNou."C _A1b1) PARTY The Baptist Church in Edmonds will complete [Li extensive rebuilding program this week, and aLoida Y nI- ternoon,%Murch 30. at 3-00 o'rla tfia �flsrte r'�ie Y7e—cat loq V Cepeep ewe 'd1fC o have a cordial Snvlt4tlon to thin service. Many prominent Baptist ministers and laymen from different parts of the state will be present to assist Paabar W. A. MccalI In dedleam 0 r[ q a WUra& The building provides - a well equipped, • modern, church working vlant. There Is a full basement with a nine foot telling In which there IN It fine kitchen, class rooms and it beautiful hall 2Ox50 feet, especially designed for entertainment and nil forms of wholesome social activities. The auditorium has been re -seated wtlh beautiful opera chairs which add greatly to the comfort iif wor- shipperm. Pastor McCall and his people are anxious that the people of Edmonds take full advantage of the helpful community service this well equipped church plant makes' possible. Hi r 1 .+.....,�,r,.,•„•— ---.....,,.,.....r.-w,,..,.,..•..-.«..war...,.-ruir•.m..,aw.+.F.y,ti _w..�••-.n ..- .. _._•_- ..-_..__— ---«,.-.__....��._ _y �•— lerby to be C', b Oct. �,. 9 ` ' - - '.1 V -E.dmands rnu•n hu I',.ile+l St, - +reel iSTru+,:ets Seu,Llc uuJ .D Everett. L'urdering on Pl.g:, Sot,... j a- 1ihnly ul Ihi' :nnln IZ Page% Cire•Irig OffGHnr,ty! $rrflurbrl+l �. will huci• ni.nlhrr _ nlhwhllo prize., Ibis lii7_A•l IND5, CJOC10 4[5?i CQ'UNTl'. �VASIIINC:"I'C)N, 111U1t5DAY, OC;T011(ilL G, 1i1dn), = (ictuhcr 9, when the V[1L11lvi[i 47. ��,=_ �_.� -.--- �• :T• O unhrr or t'+I n1IIII.0 ,• 71+at l'mehr,' 1r,•rhy. till" " �dtPTtsr CttUtiCtt WILL � It �1 RGE VV riliel rind I,nun'1 a Irx LU IZ rxcelsi Il1rrY• will e.rsgrnu• vt !hr a t- ISSUE O Crtn pi7rkieilsrrlt'. 9'Iir ; r-- - -_ l l a 91fx1 in c:tsl7. laid 14 ASKED f' t )Au:rtile prixrs w111 hr. flan with lhix event+, Twit y Levy iI is also sllpnmristF n ,•s ffLEFiF@ i'41 V children. Any child ;,•. In whir pnrticlI411es, � t�9tt asedt '� Mitt. flortS f y comnnnied by a 17nr-�- e ether •re':p,•risihle �+ l prixr in this dit'i• - T{ic Iarolxrrly (t:x lccy fnr rEI:dY Q A I[lrtnlelr radio, and •�i "' i n[ 1 l ir.xlrtiak•ly lfP mill.• arr in• 11ic h[lmr M !I m prima nllrar cr,':utC m• a Of nrilnc - q•r l%a , to •a7. rl:,p rt•rnvy: -�'F ,%' '•?'� c:rlls•rl Irrr in tll- ::d,ru,ndndx <'rlt• ilrrrrrL•}' P',. Ip vviq he an:[rr tat. ,.+. +. �•. hurt••f•I adal,lrCL ,r Ihr fit'. [nun- z ld:uiheb ir. +' aekcr l7crley 11 IN nut I r v n7, !:r l" fron. 1(f [I4, i:V rlt L 1n _ _y cif nl its Lr:ra'iru; 7� — ;( cont"tanl lr have ^+. -�-�1 lSCnrc u•,•rc sue•+t'•r1' .V•zn'n fYs7nr 5 r• 5 t' [I rr ] r All fish enterel must I Ind n!1 diCpl:ly '.sy 1k1 M p• T -�& I17C V,rclirnirrUey rr't:' : ji �f" - - II�R„ _i I r••••� h:r,ulrrr enl,T �1 Sunday. acs- `l, at 4trtnr.•nrn !•1 [vo •.r:th;n the I 1 Sunday. , I � {limn'Ir• t61 a1 1r; •: g,l Intit,!d :,r C tr11 street an I' wa-i .viih i{,r r•,,;,:plirn, of Lht• r ,• r #r, _ I Tirkrtx.On 561� d: I^u:n arllrs: I'urul tvhirh Ir'"PIC! nU: • 'I'ii,� tllrrtf: IT the Cr lrkrr Jer17y 1 i ddlts and $1 for chit-1 re on sale at the fol-I All - F dmhntls nirae[ .Vow [lardware, led Shnp, fteliahlr I1:,rd nr' Cmeery ann West- triply. laces-*nle A ." 1 gLart :,s Ahlitt t.rtd g7crl'fi I•ral-dw . +e ett li>:hlan[tcand 9 • S17nrl rnrn lligilu•a}•- ('llrl::iT AVORfl%1tC W. in ellarge nr Com ell noliellation tt•ilkin f F rimnndx, Inn; asked In cxtcild his lli:ts7ks to capitrins :tr7d worke" Iime. and wortls•while he campaign, hers' Gree?ang I by Gharnber - iltr t:, 7: -hatil Inw, and 1H'„r1,fs pay Iln: ru s ': s• .I„ yol 1 lh:� :ahlitinivil levy. The .rsti'•-.:cd aun,ll r:r I•+ 2 s'•,�. tilt l f calnalinit n[ l]rl' rrtx h:rs in.•n rI,- ++-+•lCr ni.�a •V •;,i ;• r-• r, r,•a•-rd '(, 5�t;ti,fiSki- plxr•.trncn=�:. SY?Cl+rtr I'r �'1 ti1ti,•r! ill rrCt,i,CS ;rl ;. {i[nits III +rrl• [ICCu �� •." iu (I! lx•tirr, nr,: ; ;asl water ,F-- ,n1; in :, r•:e a -__ --- _ �-• .pat tnu'o,;> n.,.rr .s•r',•d d•fwh. iS+�• ihr' ^u+iil � rrx,we'k Ln ibis m;II(v. V....t III .. ;;!;if m: rNkir- Nct.il•n•^ G Tim I. lire lferid II-VIIg sket[`rl li rt rue drrr„•nyNfyt r¢tr•„npint+rlldssh,�yrr,tr dr41PW 1-thrrrrhw,•tltl i,t�rlrwill Itnmz wt, ,Fit. it r•1,tY. L[•nIR4r ?r:rr vrhrrt n•mndAln>: ldnn+, n.vs l: 1. to rv. :al .I'•1,,,:'rrcllts. F" 1•l, L'riUrf G !n• t,ddrei kr prurhto the r•lrstrrl, „lilt tlu• nrrdn! rqul-rulrnt Ln L kn it, plate in mh,t+n•rin� tr, r11�f n• IF,i arid, a 1,e$l•+( '•;•rl„M,rs[yS.~f'rillnt•rifP .l,lHtultl nrt•+I>. un,S t,'hrixtlµ11 ,ri JLIlrnt at Ihr Vann,µ ally. "rhr itce• �ur,+tnu It'. tSrr+n•n, }+a. _.. _ ;+I,:ui, ;. r,nt: ilr,.t nttr1 elf IPtr• ..i fire Cdmrrh, hrsml. Ll,r curnmltlw, „urkilrk Ins: rdnux Tnr iht7 irupru.-ratnt�{, !u rnx! nh�,ul �,Y[1.Ihlp.... vr�ell( [ilul5.�,ai ! t :,r a r nr r..•til ;•i•xElrl rtrn' s,rk'• 'I•r i I I, r•13['i 1rx. _"Conti f7 �ytl ii"ril+',.&4 _ rt•tt'tli:n,• •+! Gommuw?' y Chest Hopper Gheurr•'_ ` SIt3q. •i•n t ouni, t:« CT+,► Issued Pl:rmit• No. 3 �� P$3k'{ �i3ii�8�i�55�i�#is 1rrl ur t,rr to Board is meet _ —_ ,:rynrir. }ul[•n' L• d 4+ Fnrinin� nn rlr•11ui1„ f = {• l y' A rnx.1ot14n t•Ailinl: rur the ltva- Isrl Gi+>:5 n, frill, x+•+rr Lvdr,Ix, and e+rr1[inl: t'v �4'ark iy- lFrnra=ssirt • ra ridl net - !„ Itllead Ihr. +Yrrryllnlrp r t i'ls,• hoard of dil•resnra ni she Ilu• .upi�r:+tvucture ni tkr, lhrr".• n7iil ns:+ximur7: tus tr'vy• fnr t,i1A crrrunirs, r• �r'1'°"' •1•hr..plr•` Crraler Fdrn.nds Arrt1 Comf+7u• rtrtt' t+ddifirgy,tL) illn ldnpl:er Chev- tv:tr• p(1-vd L,y [ltr I•:[Ins+l4nl� ['Vrl lisrtcrm[:v L'r.,,,r-n.nily ehlh ntS,!I- [iiShe i+lyl! raw c+utipnny huildin>,: n( $[•rvtud �.nnu7=ixvinst i„ I,.rlw:i i„E 5r:'zirrn ni ing 'ILr.:d. llrlr be, ll, 'rt 'i -•ia � rt hr•i[•fs l.• � oily 4hrst and dislrirl rasnlhrign :end lfain. The }rsildmg ss cxpeOed she office of 1 ioftc k 'IZIc Il. ' uc p. m. in tkr F"xjr_:n,}re 1c1,uu1 aiS nrK Ish't o �♦ pirpt:,ilt5 w'Ifl n1T•C( nrftl ruC`ldtl}• Z1L'Cih1Me1 V rtt•ning to N Forelock at the. lSd_ sa oe rty 1'nr oteCUponry LOWk1t del•• vVenlal:, "rile levy exnecird 1, uk tit awns. i VC Sll will :r• el".11 r•l's:lon hall in ltmr rClsnrsx ihr 11rKl uI 1)eeeniLrt•r. szld E. F In rai-,e $For-i �'l.-M. I+ SCuut int•c�i{4urc pl.'vl:s•nm. with i+la,r>rd !f r tr the• prngoas al the Clnxl elin Ia f luplx•r, the rs..ncr. I, V. t'histcudl;n, srcraturp of Lhr Esrxr.ner at'tfut rn, I, in ldnnnrd t0 tlul,lirry; hill Ilie &Ait%cliur+ the. voti)IFFL oil. yxid ihtis �'hilr ,-:lurl;t• or re[rts•imen[s' thrpu>:I�. t; t':<mpail n :tral plan for I(c ttlerrs.- nC brio}, t to first so he erected I'r71 eDm171c[i.n, _ iIIdell:edlirts Agninxl Ilse di -trick City hrsl n'. ur7d4r f:sr nt vt' Clly hL11ld1ng C:]dC. iC 115]11' 11lt I} St,1�S.1 i, the Cnt171Yl1t LS'.1,t:, t, r'ir4':fit AL(_ lV 1-rlb:r+ rrl y in lh tiuhscrirlth,nu 1rr %Into emit itiir. i 17:, (•7n1.; Vern issue[[ Ron bolicv:;c that. ritinr'r avlh•.- -- •talldard 11 i Report, Ircon the cnmpai�f7 i?r tit,!-. cx x'C .illy ir. thl rvrn! rite ilinniN and � ltnrtl Itz+l f y( x cxlrndinl a .rcicome chairman. duclx I13. Sx'cntinss, and Ior its c+r5(rurllnl7 ,)n Srptcmher i 1. iry,e annuli; ' lrkcy 1. 'lift• ttv,'k :ti Cinder llie dive hrt•akwilter is CC)Ast+'(let,Ld soon. q+rt:41' will be I c•a !w. dn}s thi; rnt {tor: l+r IJJ t as they Come Into this trcncurcr, rtncti [- 17una1d, inlS+rt+i- tiLin S,1 f.91ti tiollvis. will ri.luivc -r considerable .lida:S yellr• No emlle. it and.13. prrisr.. were discussed At the vd Iliat only nirnIII St9(1. Q ha[I kr<r:5 tea.: - tent ikt:it :t ix x•;.r. to I pill nc- ••it'crk or l r:•YM' "tsfd SCIt L the Edmonds ;,}lymlrer turned in nd to t:Isi niI 'Thi>: L't1Trl:iiTF+ Y'ri 31Eli r,srtnsl:flint hiruls fnr that piirrxM-- atilt". []Ctni,rr to 81. will L•[: n12- C ,rCC at 'i7tc [;rill last. � y.yt I;bnn Co. fourth of the amount _ 'rtsc as.v�xr:d euhntilon •uf the xerVL4 TueLnday I.-'u to her L3, in :I , •fill• c}u Qy noon., actu:,liy ncedrd fir the, tt•.rk .r-Tha-Cotcrir. t�i11-hald_dis_first.. ( tP`io�thr-sMriII_eom--FTC+,e-gWr11x: ttlAri�•drpendenr"-ilIlan •+[+rt•..,li'+triet, as-:innourtcuYl.t1a�.tilC meeting.ut.1hr..:liC.thx;ixl,<:itureh,:'Fir. 7ito1T, envetin • xlf ihr y'+ 3: •Icxl Thilts rwu,+ty as�r auv is, h�' Cunrmiis;nn al 2 a durh• rli3'vL $V eil (red d• Mike : r Ae_9lcd flit Community Chcsr for next day, z Luilar 13, • '- 'l o clock, tit t] •s .f newcomer.• he oll- rears artivitit•t. r ditlricts: - nln Friday. []rtnher h ;.i ais ))it r7, (nxu Id she f>.11.A. otf.cc and ■ the hunle o[ Nirs. J, c:. ]ireudrena• F'isxt IN. of �,fniund ] $1117,1}±r{ lltn[Isariti, Spcie[y, elf Chrixi.ian purci7wKr O a1TiCC, Ir 5.h1C, and t s11Urf humiselLs inretin Witt 6@ crcq::d rG'dninnd�t, SG3 i.ril3 Sevvice vtill hull a I]ish ic1 Carl -I to r,1(v ti r • r1{Y;y(-;1TF1 '['flA4iC% Ilk3;f.i[.' fnlln,ecd 41}• a ghrrgram ra�aisliss): •l'l1lS'.d IS. nS }:d'nonr!-:1. X:!,tr1G,- t•a!1 Tr+rClir+g with f5.lhok:, nl f3Vtl, Lc•odcrl. !h Q siandm$ cYlam+Hlec hr _ ul soand hltu. All old meallfCi:� CrIU,. - ell, Ihr nsCt'[ial; lu sE:,ri nt l['tilflr if :Ir with a hr[/chure, or some {jffirrri and incnthrrs ni i:d' :+rc t+rget! ItP 6n prctie•nl i[ 17o�•sihh•. ry•y , ir,•I R'tih J,.nKlnrr•r, ei clock. hlY. about Edmond+ to prr` in„nds Ct:urt, 01,der [tr AlliVi tll. f ivurri i;:. K Itnplrcr tine - -- -. - ;:tine in t these IFoop[r 1•rrsanaliy slegire lij rsprcxs llicir Lltstnkti to 9, ur+unycd slilrt tilt! ew"Illisviwl has j ¢� i !tier Chnr ending them a twHCorne. the ltubliC fpr lhrir genrruus 1r.+- Edgar Leslie Blake, llr•rr7 invis+•tt L,+ mecl whit the ect@`0r''��8�ttatiraette nluh+C n d ;iana warc_mndcahut,�n- Trori lit ltu• Snx,rgisO Ird htla =tun••virith 1x mal:nfludr• n' Ranh n f•vcY%jllV to the mer- �s a � Arn(j+-F"rinrcnc-hr :'3n:,llfr thin• - hP lnl.iml- m, other plg.tnizatlnrts Saturday Noted Aflistl f+asrsa6s 11'ritl+y nficruwnt ns l:Jt1. (n ,iiv- ��� n� ��{ � faj,r w[nlld 1tr contacted far ro-opera chants who donatt•ll htir prir-cs: to cticv mnitt•rs. ir, vowsdCtinr! will) •L ier cen re making drflrilr larva• Shirley Weller nor Purhin s Stare. [.t1;pr LAtilir It rkt .0 lenrllt the .Irinitclsed lyreakwxter, inchid• -� I lotion, p vtf7n. Cut nn a . [yic sit.,r; +end to r [inxlnd7c nntiona;l: • knaan - 17a irsc any rt,r,ngcx C(7nten7pins'xt, fn] l7tr Pointer -'Hilt+rxnrnr- Corr jeer nnrhy Ape •ntrJ fir, 1lrarl.nler of i.ynmv[xxY Cur hit Y Lnwiris: tl•r new cu+wey of she hilt• Ivsny llti5 tvtck-Cumplel r[l N+C eon- LVnlnrr rtrtidllury •cn. natnc+l mcc.rdi.n music. fir tiurihx'rstarliKt, is:e�tp(f :ntn 1 a[ n committed to make ■ 'It ICiti Ilnmc Sund t}. lY•r made lhi.R slimmer. Istru[!Liun pf a nu�c trni{rr' For il+v c[7lr In .c a ,Cracker UcrLy:' open :t:ltti[ R1I'T10T DUIVY.. ENO% arr. tshrke „sti •7'n in Arislcr [hnvy tit Ike It twIli nn, an Env. r Sunday. r Derby.' .' dam• N. Y.. 1(+ i4•a7' -190, Ile. rare[ e -- � � ky f:n the faclt+Xt rtrr to Ur w01I'm . nn Bull pYaiard Ihr order• Tf7r sircCial Vifcr un nett' yule la srn171e its ji,01 v n[•n• Tor many V6a P. $ked #o NY I nntxsrtl lid r,r:rc, lF,e ernNer !+„ tot I'm ,. ct of the Teen -Age Can yr•:Ir. hr wa, a metnhrr or the a C:u'ryiltt; rapaeity or ltlfy tom-:6kis, 1 urged mrn+hrrs of the ser.liem.ends With lilt puhlicalirnr c,ligrnctnl 1Fmt of MarinS nr7d a f7� I Sad h:ls J•t (ln•tlargetruttitared tehWAY A lellei • to drop a nµ its alert• Of. sllis Kgtic of the Trillune-f[r- rS1'tke- tic -m.+'rtl to ti.rlit Ed, . fleat For city "41t As It L% too large [err h[Khvvay f`rparinie l to drop any il•nc at the vic"... with . sullstnnliril addition okii Iry a -M - -�__ eleitrnnce, the trailer is axing US- Ilse sit[• r hall. so the sal et'ipti0n Silt. A cono- fir. liluk^.rtisli+d rd the Art En trsnbled ail ihr. e.ml7nny dciklnriuv arll.or: ti were made co, the prat; lcic report Will tc Fic-en. next hcrr and +CFtt f[. Ylllrcl unto a AI r+'111'"'' p slitulc in Cl:icagn an+l under pri• Jt�ssicr nr 111_ 'Peace ilay II. •' annexe ma ltrsiiions and tt k Of Course rice au(rstrih[Ix t•ate ivaellery. Isis patntiri trerc Duty, Who 11 Also city police yudg �N far toxin•r t. i� mrrt[>n, I. are alu•a>•c tt'eloomcd! xk+.tvn in m:u+y exhil7iis in Seaitfo terra perturhel[:ISSIsr council n7erL-sump:rr7y re.. packet Pg. 286 smuniiy.Ches!• y and in Ili_ l?hs[- tic AW.CialIvvwj Inv TulsdAY c••cnin� ••hen he a'tle • art nstrutsinm.irn PrrrtEdcnt !iti *i. [torero, Ed111andS P._T. A. 5ponsars is, u.r.,7e;; ns u:itrsrr 1+ntl Ran,^d tnirl h+' �Eay'[lr i'tlrll ifcGiklt]a17 1hs hw ,}�trktrwt c:u•y,. b, -r UIM in •the stx aee nr• l .,_.., ..,.- ,r„• a:iv, ninnhrtl Io drat. rr �Z-3, a I 4..7,v-•I ntiili`+'.attar Cn-•'= t ::, .': 1:(•:, + _ _ .hfJ\[r7!�I1:SS '1-Stslii]N_ q•7LF.iril;tV, F:17isIL7N±J:. - __._.-.^��-_^.`_�._-_- - -'-•.._._. .. [TEST ���� C• - t fSian[l7Nls1; Ciij.!'t t. [;f}A!•Y.L j f YRr)Y.3' 3:rygai<r. U:�S1SEGii� I iniin. tirlmntl: ":SsmtlClc}iildrezl Q. .. ^� _ Fllr ru,d l:nil 1 sW7 77atry !{uani t� [�t•.YAII':" $ •' ve ` a r � �y�ry •4•. C..1�lntrnn, 11-v for • I r I, t• i !; 1 17, r': F;�ri: [:ev,i[•axie,n�l will 14• ,r... car[•[I [ur in till. nslr• L�yT�e. iW'-�?.!k To :di utca, l:l•I:e and fri I. I'll 7f 1 h-1!In :'. S„ .+ Ir. nt- anti frrnrl 7 11, ul. 1 YL't'y. •a �; i. What hitn,a,t Arran is pfe- 1h.• rinrrrlt, na weIl a+ IhfJyr a•hueo,n,tIprviu, I SGr:' +hiy Is. re day of P1rh skirls• r turefl s+n the ttu•:k of an Am-wicaik lun'c nu r.hul•Cis, home, wi. r%14tlil ` ('tlr'InI1ri,L. l7a}': %bil d'Pi Ott 6, 1. I nal sr;nif3r;znec Sur yo,k-� O dtdlur-Llil7••--•- or-oilR18T.. ;", iii+-ilYrtintt rum••r }t; •t to r lw I } :I. m. i � G 2i in what s.tur[ dt,r� 1r lttarn, yClirNA'la"T ,m-mor,rlidg she hirtlr of Past` Lfnrll Ilui}• C:nklnnAn„nt :11 all th•' IC•dl Vn[b•q Gp!.prLTatrsruntilr ,I •hPYr S,t knVt'C I?• I kwar#,, I,% order pkf[nanda,. %VI1mhfn;tan. and ti:tview .1Cskm thl• 01t•ixl. �1av::t••:, - , TJIn L'r,rSYlian and_ �iL+e}nuns•}'.. W .lo Hh,"' Srrriel fire held at .11 a- TO. .1.Lr [".1u'islk?and pr�Prnm• tti'!!I Su: 1`I t:;iu•is[mil:: C.nr6i:' :.it -GAXI lr11t[; Aptluin,i. . .. 3. whit • huS1J'ry -always falls jondily." iinti WesillrMI ly et•ening• •rlcru 55tu[iny. 1:kr:rtnl><r s. 'i•Itl• 13:lgf. Ill • Pal sr,«t•rh C:aeltmr q lhr Ilist day Ill ! II,Incitth,, tS S. ti clock. Blue- 9:45 to t"3 l . a nonn. Terare R,v-fo:a!ph L, wal.lrr, Pastor. 'I -Ile• C7hril lnt:+n fray nevw w: sV iF 0 .r'st6je•C}}s n[ Ixsxnn-Scrrnrnt for Ix•in}: praridell [nr nil rl,illhrn ist� a�_ Lx• rornhined into nnr`^t•Ivica 10 I:. t mid- Y. ll7ctt" Ifthrr Z5r '•C'""-s If"' ;tllrn[b+u[:c, held In llic tsmt5kirry4 rtrnx ,fl::i4 L 'Chr regulu• rtttn•cl, nrrs•kr�x n[t, fi}1i,1}tCrE [71•' Li[717 11;3n, •1'knnv will 11C r}ny-i:SC ,n IN- S ' a _ 5ummy SCiloo, lit 11 a• rn„ in :t� fnlbn,:�: Ylxth and LL-arna! cnroLs•, :cpllrini motile, ackt! ^ Xi�`Cm '• tier Sunday Scltoal hNiidinr• Sunday Schaal at ?:�la n. 1n. X" .' 'rtseitt ;7anElirJ , -emtar [;brill[ Day nn:�Jts;r. � = �L r ]Rending Etoant hours: maksday YitlrninN Womhip *Ujvkr.v itt 11 E.•-rilEay 15itii,t At 1 :3o is our pe. loony ProSSSc'x t• AU tl Cirri V brpl[gts Friday, 1_} to d p. m., Cirrlssnfnx PULP •sneludiril; flilrtlel- I trill sing. yhere +gill be• till �., .Monday. and Friday el•enjill 7 to I. Yaunr; I'roplc's mcclinrS-T 1+. m: I,irlint, t.y [l,e Skinday :i411oel t hil I servICox:• - - -- N + .y p'clxk, and SVCdncstrny ct'enin� 1Zcgular dvenipg. srrJltY'• ni S. the Ys,t,nl;. 1'. If.. givinlf Rhr plrtY { 17r. yi•r mee[inr will lK on W:t 4+ G: S:s to . an iSil?le Study and Plwyer St:r loe "TiLc Sraricf t RihWn:' ihr Chalr i netid y rveninf; e,I ft ,It like blot CL . 4 Wednrwdity tit 1S 1). m. strsll a7`+T girt=! CIn•:stm�s enrP1:,. 1 of P?,.. ns?d Mrs. lnrr,r•-•, Sincicfar- m Everett Dernvt:ruts Adameci 1 nriics l'rlt}rr m—Ung Tut:sday Snt:n'.t,y. Ilil;hl •1i,r Chur+lk of i [SCv •rod l elus ['.I'ite1T4 Will SCtu �, ]s 17,c :,t.•,:eugc lterSadI,uxl Fridi--. itt 1:3ii 11.:,:, t:1s +f•un1: IxKsPlr will 110 xmnrl flil,ic !,41t,ly will krt-thk: IInc ncr or forcer than in " Nra 5iate Purty Trustees i I«utie:: •irv>i:tnnry t:ircic nirClF r•hrlwirnmi rnnttinl;. tIf «..... Coln•' n+xl r•n3u� ibis q•hrn pScturnd in :e PSla1a' r5'er}• utk:r tt<cdn,•x+lay at lhv tik111d a}' };r•I'•Nli ni ;llialli u,tLn.- S. Pot11;1t1tCClt�ic• Ff. Y., i s the : li,ee•s rrSi• nil. f -• -- - _ LL '1'ts'lr ir:rC1'fSt nsrn x•{-rc• algx,hll-' church lnargontt}Lc. I ri';' 1.Sa't'SLL'HA`1 t:11 i"1iS' 311C tI[ x Stun 7.G5 anuval rSwr[a I,•,S iu Shn st:lSe 1,[ulyd crf truslr,.` i -a--- Jtprs••nss SFnI'shi;? al ll:fkl .r: ilh••, � .L•Cerit, Ill is Its name? I rr.,- the 'Sewn i CormOvIl o;ll hi!;- (gfllEtf,lf [1P CESlRt^,•i' I :itv },n;. y,r s,•.•„kin>; un the soli' L4'ftisu•n,•tj, wu!Ihiny,lrrtt 'I luizef i[sl; of Sh,: tiI:IIC 1 St'lffnrd titnntnn• t;lnii. �I' ••t!hri�fsna� :': hek�. :Sri• }•tsu • .Clary[ {7. '1'u^,iu•S, 3•x.lor - L. _ fAllcttrS7 i%tS l+:f}rl• `.II `„tln; iy:•t7't{?CrnliC dull Its Seat 11'' 1i} u, m, liii,l!•$i:hrr-11- i=:ks:I i,[e•iw+,L: -Suttr:ky. S7rf:[:rlt]fe,• L9: �:ls }•- 'Chey. acre. Wally- C;K_ 1 11 it- m. l:nranmwon, an,l -?Nor- • .1•:<<ekVn;; acrsire, ;tk 7:3::.)siih i lisxti s. L,1„-1ahnlr.¢,•Se,-t'h:ct .aL, .- - •- - •._. _ ._ i rile .,. +. L,naR•r _'rnnthr•:;•t noel .:,. tr . tll,• r`erulr,r 5nnduy- !.Cl?o = n,iriial•i and Ahggit• 1S,u•ili•s IvPk .hip srr:-n:••. Nr:s11Sn};• ['-'-'- Ehrihr•titnt Ll 'i le 'Algir In Phil ti:y',•,• of tilkruul 6•['t'tnH1 u•..I .1k 'I'!uu•srlry}•, IHrrilllx!r 7Z'l.. at fort,:} EYum [>:+t�lnsk'r-. ,asras7a� tra++uat+7?P7trt'.•mx'.a1'f��?•"� 19-K sv:., 4111, loured Int I'LCUL L' , j ,.:Slk u.. a...+:gqu?ial rtl In lh,• Ixtard, kCl ;-;[u Ih.•Ir t,-ii1 he :,. •11K'eh.l r',.t•. I%fl•I!•r ,; r.•;,ke,'.n , < u•cnrflifp: to llre Iirilanni:r:f Iirfnk rr5,•nlxlh',•: fi<,rn :,31 urrr Ita•'i_II.I,[m IY }Iyugrttnt; ractixlut}; of j } l,i,hllr ix dill is. f Br�il A, of kh.` YP,klt •.'•1.11•• :II.Sr15dC[t ONO li,rC[1i11;. -y Ili u,nt Slxkkkrl Ikn'k ti,'r fen olrl,; ... I till ; r.i,Y•,ti'. _._--'.• - . . -- r� oral :dso n Mirk eak pr+:•. p! our - - --... . ----- --... . .. .......... — .�...11iqu.• ;1!aitgt'-'S'Ja•-•I:'--ln �iis' --. -.... ti .. ':' !il Hit•i: •s.•k'r�}xrStkilss:u!el Jk l:l!:ik[llel. I ,511•: rSSI,1S7•-v i'�C'i1tSi,t{ 1[, •,f lilt r�f 7': +•'� O nl to :a,n Ol •y",- ",•u'ri � � 1'a'us"_',•nk- tx iltrised, r, nl=Y• ru; � tl,.,,yy S. SSaines, .li'klial.•r ! .; O - • y=� •''�"- •'lltil r t!1t'i l,k',kl•r:prn- ! }',SIµ,I+rtly WlxYlldnjr•t,n, Ail Y.,u ns•, ;:a•it!•d to x'n,37w1 ,7n i [r � 1•I1LS I' i4:1r7t:Yf' C'}Ci1lif'fL I [:furls[ atas S)n)•. � . .•1.5, "�-i � �� 1•:LLnu,udx, 7['as]thty.rr'n rL.Li d, rn. •1•!v },i�stS,n }.ehno! Rrt'- X•trusntt R'. j;I.• •n, 4'nrinr Ih,IIY, "CIIiS,.4 iq h+'1 i,ir!h,•ni t!u• �Qq R"CZEN., FIVES 0 •' I 1L S,aI i'hrE+t lS'a:J. r.,r S•SI r3K[- uxccp, ni L:r1 h++ik:,l E iEuk. ;:r•.+dur. W ' m,.:' is slir xuttjrrl 01• Sundnp• Sian will br xhntt'd. t u :...s ` `, r • i • • C'Et?'!x[ nl:.+ �T[n'frtng t5' +r r ti h i }r. ll7:i?:+ a- n,, i',;tl,t ksre: lu'r shill. ='•� Srrt'ico [[I hk 11 1. 1n. 1'1••av, attic An h•ntr s,1[ x1+,1't lu honor I1tC.� :r+'ei '- '^4`Y . _ _ :•:.� 'ti'Y Chfti,l:c .t[ linty tar IItI srr,'iGr C'llria-i�,iitS in x[Snp: :u1[! irl,'Y%aSSt' I . ;•: r'- Iefl11}- Thrry will !w• r1i1 1xs,:ti IW t,n+.i !M•r.+trot,[ do-dil lim?. !iart+k:d1� rdi,:0rri.�r„[�Yp�'tn.} � .ti-�. !i•r Y% `psis �Imlin�'. '1•I+rkr trill lsc• a nlsr- nt t,xir: sill 4,a• tiro}; h}' •S7n• Chan. � 'Y ,: '. :.ir rkr;,'y in,• t:h}Idyl•:l nl NIr•vr:lxldl crl. r:'ho,'!:;icrti and C a r,s [ r r t+ y fri i rf t J•y..• .,;5. _ r,, �E{iti71ti_1ii;:,_r•S� 'r' �.i 1 � ,t1!r• f'hnit-ti. lrn, rtkrnti i=,'11 _ nil�Yie . tt1 lx• gl J� rq ;� t All s,rtk :,,•• ip•iu,! }Ir4[I in ;,rneu.lt•fS lIr \!• 3fcrmsn nest•i• •T >. �}•;Illi?nnrlti rY:t :1ldrrunnil :iT: r ? Sh[• .'1kt11'['1, Ira SL'n1t'n: !n•kld, nl: V 11 , hi• 171'y;:pl C:rg C,u L:, nRd }?}• 'svS,', � F�az%� f ' •;tl � '}'• � [•Inn}?Irt'.•k•i I,{ the art:• l,tlildil:r, V t7rl:,nd Chrixlcn :r-n [,I:.}•knw the . '�:+' !z�«L°--1�'.�• �'i'`r�i'x , — - .�--� — gyp.-�'� sin,.r+r.•c-•a�,n�:ln��itnmrarl:ss_e.�urntt'. + • , 'r / ;l ` TIP Ill 1�eS` a' : SAYS U. Mary Gardcts• t¢tt. ollCrr trot,7 ?'este,•ilcar• tells Unlle6 Press lrorres;pondent Laura Etz In Chtr-aga S. GETS CULTURE- t2sarshe•th[nk8"the-center t-weriri--niltuse•-t"hitILn{t-fram•CtuaPc__. ......-,._7w.�-ia��• - s!y $F,Sfi7+.5))CS ti[""• � L,1 to the tynited States. Mtss [=Arden la 9n To in this country• % •; t4 -�- . - - - ._ - - f • � r�rJr &rigJl ,rrrd livpPY • �� � We Irish yov Q all the holida ,� rfncl SJie glect'airsL �� jv7"s wil;�s'i� t e • i'T�r a� Ti ) 'rd� $C3 v � -C SATE TR AIDLNe I Y ear, rix� `.m yj Tliirel :tnd Main I'LiL L :a i :l tl[ ECE i'l1r:IC :rL � i 1 ' P .. AILP.•E.R;i_�.# I n k U Ail 211 MAIN' Packet Pg. 287 6.1.f SIGNIFICANCE The church was established in 1909 as a place to worship God, to hear the gospel of Jesus Christ, and to serve the community. The church was used for many weddings, baptisms, and funerals and community events. The church, located in the heart of Edmonds, was a stabilizing influence in the then mill town. One of the members ran for mayor of Edmonds in 1924 because she was concerned about the crime rate and the boot legging business; that person was Mrs. Kerr. In March of 1965, the church opened one of the first preschools in our area which served a large part of the community. First Baptist has been an integral part of Edmonds for a total of ninety five years; seventy five of those years at the present location. Although the church has changed its working name to "North Sound" the original Articles of Incorporation are retained. And the mission of the church remains the same. Packet Pg. 288 69 '6d 4a)1Oed t. �I F V9 WE e v i.eAv Yy^..;w _ ..r+7Y. '�'?�•+d1.w yT- • MRCTT;, h.�0s111a Bliatl�DtlltlWC6lBIIl Spedhouttall fJolrlut� +��� , SHINGTON, FR AY, .Son Said to Have' Shot Father in Argum ECEMBER 5, 192-1.7 WIIOLE NUMBER 10.17. ..rord Kenney, Meadowdale poultry raeiscr.- is in _ Providence hospital at Seattle, with it bullet wound in his head. Kenney, At was stated by King county sheriffs, wits shot by his IS year old son who took the part of his rilolher during a family quarrel Tuesday morning. Bing county officials ordered the boy and Itia mother to report at the Scuttle Wiee at 3 o'clock Tuesday nflernoon to talk with Sheriff James McCul- loch and peed S. Plymale, chief criin- iltal deputy sheriff • from Snohomish AOunLy, lktaails of the shooting are,meuger- rbe King county men related that Air. and Mrs. Kenney were engllgad in an, argluntltlt when -the boy sided with his mother. The quarrel_ culmi- nated in the boy seizing it 22 caliber rifle and firing nt his father. The bullet struck the elder Kenney n the mouth. Becauue the bullet broke off several teeth, hospital attendants stated belief that the )ullet did not lodge. in Air. Kennev's lend. They stated that unless conr- tlications developed, Kenney would recover. Sheriff McCulloch alit] Deputy °lytttlde left Vverett shortly before :.o'clock Tues hly aftrraroon for 'Se- 141e. it wits not known nt the :*Unty orrice whether an 'arrest AGuld be made,---Everlett fieral+l. DANCE PROVES SUCCESS The "hard -time" dance ri� n 'lot .he opera house last Saturday night ly_Frii9k_Freest• linxt No. 06. was I• lar•Itt:ly..aLlenilrtl etiftlir and Fucersz Fill in overy wry. Tlie music- rul- Wished by Linle'a orchestra of ltrria- ,rton, proved very popular, and w•us greatly uppreciuted by the dancers. The orchestra consisted of the following personnel: TI1&. Sheridnn, piano; B1r 1161c, I'rumpet; Mr. I'aterson, Truer salto- ahnttr;-hir: Adnmsr-eaxaphonC:_Pn�� f}ewey, violin tine) Herald. Dewey, :irums. ntrs, R. ll.-1)oty won the prize for h�_?itps7�es,ptilal st►tna.represont,- ing )dare) times ioi the IDal i ,z, anti Fern Rlttenhauar: well the 'raze. P.-T. A. Adopts Resolution Asking M01-C Voting Places The resolution risking the Icgisln- .urn to pits n Ilaw providing for sore than rife Toting place in school listricty, prepared recently by a ioifil coenntitLcc of clubs in this listriet, was passed unanimously by ho L•'dntonds Parent-Tencher's asso- -i;dion in session nt the hlilk- choet ruditoriuni on Monday evening. 11rs. C. 'L. Jackson was elected :ice -president to fill the varamcy .�ausod by the resignation of Alrs. Bertrand F,vans. A motion was paaised ramrrmodin,• he hoard of education on their plus (BAZAAR ATSUCCESS JEDA10NDS ELECTS The bazaar and dinner held L} the ladies of -the Edmonds Cnrllnrrr'I'- if ®�� A '` C MAYO lv church ul the 1. O. O. F. 1, it AN AS N Wednesday evening was well n.- tended and succe98ful in every re- spert. I Mrs. J. H. Kerr is -Elected A bounteous dinner was served B Majority Of in the hunqurt room, beginning .1 y - sic O'clock. One. Vote In ()to lodge _room hoautifully decorated booths were in evidence Willr it vole IrI to 10, Alrs. tehere articles of many kinds were -of J. 11. K,,rr wa- •elected nniyor of offerer) for rule. They were well l:dnurrads for it tali -yens term, he - patronized. !; anent• with the first meeting of the At 7:t10 ,t splendid prol:nrrn tv,r.: cell• rnunril In .Innunry, over At. C. given its fnllown, wllh Ihr• trey, Buhl. I:ngrl:', present otovor and oundldn'.e J. Allen neLing it, rludrma'rt: for rr-election. Airs. -Derr ran nilA1r Rinno duet —Ales. tlul•br r,1 ,u' I a "sticker" can,lidale, ltud did not . Was er. consent to run till OrtIV a few days Vood Solo--Af ass Petersen. before the l.h•etion, upon the insis- _ Rending —?Miss Beazer. toner, of ;r rroup. of ellize`ns on it Vocal Solo> J. At. Tell'or. lner, enforcement platform. �-� Piuno Solo ---Martin Swartz' Airs. Kerr k pre-idvot of the Fd- Salc of (Ilristmas Seals Under mm�ds Cnlrrie, prresi`evit of the lira tisl Afission Circle, president of rho ViTor. \rn 1 r apt reel. hTiSsinnar• Srwioty With nu impetw,- that prnutiser to aurpnss all previous efforts, both finnneinlly and educationally, the seventeenth annual sale of Christinaa scads iuts swum into action. Over 17,000,000 of these gay litlli holiday messengers have bran di:: tributed lhroughouL Wasbingtou The ,mails. the echool children, ono booths in leading business houses arc the chnone k used by the ehuirmae in chnege in each, county to reach even the, indst remote and outlying districts. Already the response luts be-. uch its to -?reuse -various centers is nplaitr fur_addiliviutl supplies. A fonture crf the sale in Tneontt- is it series of radio talks on vnrlow phases of the work, which hits been arrnngtil for by the Pierce Counl:l Lemac, Thus even the very nit is filled with tht• n1e`ssnge of the ChrW- mas seals. For each seal does cnrry It mv,, sa ,e that .finile.ii syinpnU r•tic-r•.cha art- ever' heart, the conquest of tuhorculosis- Seals cost only it iron• -gy ,&*ch- but-, if c+ery • ono -in • f L! state will hilp his share the work in slate load nation will be assured for the corning yenr. Think it over. RE-FLECTED STATE SF-CRETAR" 'I'In- r,-rl-lee !,n:n-,I of -I l:,• Wnrn• an's Legislative Council has' olock• i Airs. Itnlph Bliss elwirntuu of the) dclarluu•nt of education- _ Alrs Illiss has api,ointed Alrs. Afiuuie kraut of '!•aroma, Mrs. Ilelin-MvVew, Ill, Nver- etL, and Alrs. Frederick Bolton of Seattle, ruem1mrs of her connuittor•. 10*islaliou lletlnining to schools v6r' education, which Seeks the SO of till- Council, should he Sent to the chatirnuu, of 1JIe dr•parlav•nt for con- a sidert!ior.. at-. it:: Meeting early i,if Jan wary Local lWen Open Flower ... L7-i .-.. tl.. ..�,. .•f Cn .l dun .f It-s r� titi-[,rismYSx:n, :utd llnnte Alie- - ;imt vier -president or the Colundrjm 1Gvr•r distriel of till, Baptist denoin- inntmn. —In it slalenu•nl yesterday, Atrs. Kerr emphasized dint no radical action was conteorplated ill city nt•fairs, nail flint any report of ouch ova, rnLlt4•Ip unfuundcd: Suliloarters of the whiiioistrutiou vestrrrlay announeod that they had delermined to pctitlou for it re- - count of th❑ votes. The petition will Ill. filed with till. superior court iu-- - F,verelt today. Other candidates for tho several city offices were noopponed. Geo. Ilruckntb and E. W.• Swl-et were re- oh•clyd t•onncllmen from the first Will- second- wnrds -for.-a--tern' - of_ four years, and W111. Reiwrislt wtab rlet•terl cuunrillttaa for It four-year lone iron[ the llillrl ward. C. W. T.rit•s was re-elerte•d CQllnetlillrm-rit- Iargc• Ceo, lluaxnn wits chosen city sttornsv. Clio. ht..rreyrht war: re- t•Irrted ti•:rk and 11. V. Allen tre'na- firer, The vote by ward_. wan Ian follawa l.t 2nd 3rd 1! h.' i:rtFnle ....:7 7r' 37 Airs. Alice Kerr dG .1It •17 re". 91. Leydn .. .. S1 10:1 68 It. V. Allan ............. !IG I" -74 Cen. P. Hanson 1tf !I!I 03 !:. 1v. Toles, 87 97 71 - r;cn. lir•nrk••I! N f-. W. Swo.•I tall Holiday Spirit is Ilvidencpd in Edmonds With lli+•-display of hulidlly goods. in the stores and show'windows of E it InoNoughts of our peoplo turn to ill kIgbt,, of ('hristinas and _ ::Ir`e:uly the glad holiday spirit. of fond will to non set'ms to be per - till. t•et•y-aUuoslohere. ator,•a of Edmonds are pion -the rre%rlest ('hristnlas displays crag shown in Erhnoudm, and there DS,- SNOHOMISH . COUNTY, 'WASHINGTON, FRIDAY 1 6.1.f ... ... ' _ ': - is • • BEIt, 19, 1924_ WHOLE NUMBER 1049. ;s { �" Children Collect Gifts RS• KERR ELECTED $LY _•: 1V�c�y� r-'�a�ec� of .�'drnQrid� For Orthopedic Hospital � 1'Il -- ees of -.""",�"^'^_"'''^' '"""''•". The pupils of the I-Amondn Grade By FOUR MAJORITY rmerce School have been• colicetinK egg' _ o-ope-I - thin week for flit! Children's Or•lho- ' e new Vedic, hospital, Seattle. There will Council Re-count Establish- t was should ' he nearly Atcrate for sendlnK PrMay, Generous- contributions of toys, , es Mrs. Kerr• y Election. 'ednes. _ jellies, fruit and clothing hnve been as, Mayor brought by the children for the -- .igs it Orthopedic iiospilnl, and kiln Dell- A total of 163 votetl against ls9 O If the cone -is' Childron's Home, Fverett. (or her opponent. Al. C. Engels, t r and encumhent, was accorded Mrs. J. H. U ehnpe Edmonds Odd Fellow!) Kerr for the office of mayor of L. Edmonds, as a result of it re-count To Give Benefit Dance t meet- .. ,� �• l.r the vote of the December 2nd fJ stings . . Edmonds Lalge No. 9(i, IO election at the' meeting of the city next _ a O. V. is advertixing a benefit dance council Tuesday evening. Till The (n �'' to be given lit the M:dmonda Opera -re-count wits made nit the result of an Information filed by dls- w i = ho 1'e house Saturday uvuniug Dccembm W. IL Otto, charginge that shin O m plans p- »t.t, i� i c ; ^ A ('&gyK Munic will be furulnhed by Veer, hnllnls had birth improperly counted +. mtin- meet-? b+i{; +� c•`',�: lr� Wright'x orchestra of Isverett, snit by the rlrrllon offlrinls. The i cam- „i i S'• _ _yp refreshments will be served in the fist ward gave. Mrs. Kerr GR Mr. Engels ILL hall by the Rebekah ladies, and ng'' df; second want, mcry Dancing will start nt'nille o'clOcl(, Airs. Kerr •I7, AT r. P:Ilgclx 77; thir<l � male and tickets me one dollar. wurd, Mrs. Kerr 18, Air, Engels 37. L Thretigh an orror in reporting the Nogg to r, Tax Limit• League Plans unofficial returnli tho week of the N :e tosed State -Wide Organization election, we gave Mrs. Kerr it ma- jority of only oar vote. when it 2 U 'each -5:ir should have been 1fI to 159, or a Statewide Coutmitlee appoint- majority of two, ucrnrdinK to the M as a ed by the Je Mill.TaxLiulit official returns of the election d s on dinteu Live Comtn,tla• fallowing imnuldiutely hoards: The council re-count in- Ifar c tt. - aCwr the general eleci.inn, Inel Ill crensod Airs. Kerr's Ivad by two �.- O :Ivei- ° - the Banquet Room, Ruder Hotel, Votes, (A a_:ot _ $rattle, Washington, for a luncheon The other city officinla declared O n in and afternoon conference on Thum- by the council to have been elected v �- day, December 11, 1922J. ltepre- were: , scntulivex from vnrioua counties of C001170 At. Lrylln .- ..... City Clerk 1 the state, including, hone "owners, iL V. Allen . . . •. City Treasurer O y -,'-';! �!�`"rq •�:• •` ' fanners, members of the . State Cro. F.. Illulxou .-. City Attorney W Cliff �; _.:. •1,,.�t+-�,- - —.....,.y,_y, Grange, reullurs uud other properly C. W. Toles Couurilmun at l.u• i;r - �n8 •" r owners, sttended.- - Ceo. limckelt_.. C.,uncilnuln Ist 1Vard 'enitY MRS. J. H.' KERR Following Litt- rending of reports F. W.- Swoet...Councilman 2nd Wurd , mph ° and raCOI11111L•IltlatlUlltl from guoul, Win. Slerrist....Councilman 3rd Wnrrt Elected. as next mayor of Edmonds on •December,2, bar mentings ill Spokane and Dellingliam The lust three mimed were elected t rti and other parts of the state, Mr. to serve four veorl, while ills term been q Vote of 163 to 159E as shown by.a re-count of the ballots Laurence S. Mouth of 9cilttlo, pre- of office of the other' officials Is �•% by the city council on Tuesday evening of this week. acnted a resolution directing at- two ycnl9.. � poor Illustration courtesy &attle' Star. tention to the fact that the condition The new mayor and officials will days atra- __..__..__.� _-_ ...._-- _... _ _..._ .___ - _ r of real-estate nil :1 result of exccssive taxation is worsu than wait disclosed tnke office at tit(! sleeting of the council on Jnnuary r,., she eing New Electric Line'Being Floretum MembFavor ers in the recant 40 Mill Tax Limit Great Northern railway and Union Oil Company X ,.,ray ca,,,ptdgn, and that threll4ifths of repmventativea and LU ghat Built to North Edmonds Dahlia as City Flower the state's wealth is practically T. R. LaVarne, conferred with the bout untesod, while refit -anti yutsonal council ill the matter of the, resolu- hj�ey The- Pilot Sound Power & Light At the meeting of the Edmonds property repruseatting the lsalanc++ tion In improve the ten gate, and O bed _onrYpltay It- rebelLdin� its.iine ilia M� Heeth'l:dmurija .Wfig"IMt: ham betm .Fla rtum, .Monday evet}ing, ,& vote w°f �aReh amvNfY flat lnvan ream- pays all *of the dixcct taxnx, and dot, rio 'mnll(S'10.� i{iiGf' Wilt Ceitr upon tly�,jr miviee it Witt) tlecittlr+l ko tit:�lvt ill tha n;art•,llw -•Ist!lle- �nrl' ! E erles R _P giving oar aervilo oa it has kreen bcrs present to ascertain their choice from the efforly of orgiulizatlon.4 tion of a new twit wall, the t) enl y averivtuled for a innA time. for cif flower. The dahlia ree!ivcd Y and officials to reduce taxes b 3 attorney wits instructed to Y prepare Tko company has a lacy,-c crew of little votes, the .marigold one end econotlies it, government. The resu- a new resolution covering some. The r0+ Q ,um- mrn an the jab to take rlvWn tile old the rose one. lutiounanm iously passed follow- u as proposed inrrea=e in the num- save wire for a distance- of nenrly two All of our.readers who are intar- ing an,nts to its prc�unble is cadnw ber oLe f street lights na hill nv,•r enls miica anrt replace it with extra lar7;c cstcd are u to write or telephone as follows: Cgs p till a future Ineeling adit•o definite copper wire. I their choice to the Tribune-Ittevi�w RESOLVED: ralell wnahl III. uctil;dd.•, ived This will cause the power to he.{that-we may give the Florctum the 1. ThuL we reiterute our belief The rl-qut•st of %. W. Swett for Ilge- Ghat off for one day but will rteaalt' results of our poll oil the choice in till' u,•vh AiLy anti jltxt".." of dr•,till till- la ill• 111a.-d lit it. all!')' oily' In very much Letter dcctrie Her- for. city flower of Edmonds, placing n lirnit on the tnx rtto In was the. vice tq She people in this district. be levied against real anti personal City Engineer NV. IL Dunhnr re - king .. Dr. H. 11. Kreuter to be property- ported $736.9.. due T. C. Kelly, Princess Theatre to Give Edmonds SCO�ltmaSter 2. That It statewide organization cunlracts on till- Third Street fill, Le formed, reaching Into every legis- sad moill- was allowed. YS Free Christmas Matinee lative district of the state, to include A pool room lirenxe wits rrnnted Owlnir to bin lbaidnig- the .^_iLv, all who:Ynvor a fair and just N-Avin I?. W. Minnek,•r upon uppliculiun rites The annual free Christmas matt- Scoutmaster Robert J. Allen• is giv- Ing his of taxation, to, prepare for ,Ind accomlift" ied by the $6.00 fee. _to up work with the Roy Scouts ncc Lo le given by the lhincrsel,tad curry on a.'campaiJ<n to secure, either Alryur AT. ('. 1•:ugrls uud Cmni- s in Dr. I{. H. Iirctsler is amaurtil Theatre will be given tomorrow af- K by initiative or legislative action, cihnrn ('. N'. TuL•s, Cea. Brackett, log- ternoon, Saturday, at 280. Theaat- charge-- tm he enactent of a lam placing It J. At. Telfer, ('hex. Wilt, Thos. ]f'h- traction will 6e Mary Pickford in Dr. Xretzler has had eater live limit on the tax rate that . maq be Scanlon, h:. W. Sw et Dud Cee. 1V. by "Pollyanna." scout experience and the Troop will levied on real anti personal properly. Moore were Itrl•xl•llt.. sec The theatre mans ement extends g be In efficient hands while under � his rare. .3. That no bill relatingto reve- he -U, Packet P . 291 g The an invitation to the children of nuo and taxation prepared ,Sllrpl'1SC Given in thA .Vd...,..:dn . 4 ..:..,.,a�., -r,. - t,o rs,..:. _ _-- _ __ __-_----_._�- its at this time for the cumslsi, lie rn-__j_ ■ -___--_f ___- •t�_ r a 79 :j. Packet Pg. 292 6.1.f lee - toe., 01 la7 Packet Pg. 293 ANNUAL STATISTICAL REPORT From May 1, 194-7._— to April 30,1943-- of the Church of To the Washington Baptist Convention, 509 Ranke Building, Seattle, Wash. Read to the Church and approved on ------------- -)njcL<j ....... U ................ Signed by --- Clerk DIRECTORY 14 - Church Date of Organizat:.nn ....... .... . . *Pastor Address Date of Settle f Pastor -�-It7 Pastor *Clerk 7nilf�. C,-� - 0 "7 . .................. Address —&-- ---. �, � - *�- 4 . *Church Treasurer Address 7' *Benevolent Address ... Literature Secretary Address .. ........ On what ni hc do you hold your prayer meetings? ....... . ........... . ............... Ordained Ministers, Members of this Church Name /I P. O. Address u................. Church Sch *Superintendent Address ......... Key Children's W rkerWZM-."-& ... Av Address Vacation Church School Did you hold School? ........................... ------------------------ ------ Missionary Education Did your Church conduct a School of Missions? ........... ........ Leadership Training What is your church doing in Leadership Training? __________________ How many received credit? __________________________________________ Standard? ................ Ist Series?..-___.....-_.__ 2nd Series? Women's Society 11� *President ------------- ss -;L Address. Secretary -i ry I .... -� . . ........ Address Laymen's Organization *President Address .. . ................ Secretary Address Young People's Organizations *Senior President).�-- Address High School li President....... -.— ............. . ... ................................. ..... Address ...... . . . ..... Intermediate President................................... . ......... Address...... ......... .................. .......... World Wide Guild President - ...... Address .. Secretary ................ . .................. Address........ ............... .............. Children World Crusade President... . ........... ...................................... . ......... . --.— ........ Address.................................................................................. Secretary --___-- Address - Organized Boys' Work Name of Organization President .........._....— Address _______________ Adult Counselor ......... i Address DEATHS Name I Age I Date of Death I Feature of Special Importance 6.1.f Tribune'~Review iadr.rhtart Ar<:s f!'::r,rr; ,'r 'tlr a>TA. E'rx.st"- P.�r,dtrrnz i„ P=.,r,rr r.arf price s C 1gt: t{Gl;t.fLSH 0-AI.I.ITY, W'A Fi!*;C:Tt7":, Tllr;ri f,a :TING CALLED FOR TOOL FRIDAY AT 8 Inter-Commuriity ~� Plans Discussed School Election ' Tkis Scrturdta :ny, ihr- Tr[Ir: ,-:n•,uritr•nr 1t1+r,.,-:• - ir.•?•frr- rn -irrl ,1 1:' 1fall, h:itr prwnr;.r•1 to fir• ptevn! c„ITI rnur,lf Y ��.fy '` t`•° •" ihr }''frruxrf.; ..,r.. r h,+ll •,,f "I?:;r--- 1G.", From 1 to 8 ar- and I., I;t., fSnt-bond lnfnrma!trxt IN-niny when F'rtr afr'ut t1u lr prosrram_i, iN Ed- F'x ir1, nti isn't vof,-r-c nl ihr• rn-� i{ „n,rr;. •. ,.., I,, .'.,1;: I- I A.- L nn-Awx1, e lr. urnrm• x fIrr- hrr,l dintrtrrt ""I to art, in .\ir1.•r-. • v r.1 1..inr,r 1 r;:, hrr.,n,1 Il;..r::.+nl, an r:>:..;.:<t 13ttr :rltr-nr1 Ihix rn.•,•rl::;; to 1;.-roml- r.:.-t Stir. -rr:tw•r� ;; ty;r, ns';;r•f: U,t sr aL :mitt'-r tr•ttrr ar-.l:s;,rot,+1 u•r�t rr,r- r r1• ref rt:.• .r rr.,.-rl, (-•;.:,r P1 ..- —1.j r.a 'ir,: ,f Jan- wrI of ty, t's- +•crmd le In • i. and g the last t pur- h Ed - I will amity .rlr-r • ra I-% in In A of to rtr•ar ry to and to hear dlr,rtly from them while they 'ittn,l fir. Winter Arrives Here at Last f;dnx_ td-s -arid viCindty had R 1-ch of "I winter' at dust when a brisk northerly wind last Friday n4;hi AM Sallircuy brought the rx�th%znts mr-trr tthe. fr; to varinu. tots I>Pirrw the fret nt_ fYi► low,rst -a] it ,r.:aw:nt r l_atr atLdaft<. Ir•rFnorfri(untfrinon •o."v'i tr�q:will oily ryxnfr:erClil. f•llJn rYilJnrli r,( .:a 1-:1aj IA- I-A—r, ai:/1 .✓, nf'�r/-}� virne kind had ton p.-f x^q ,t t,,i P. C':, t,l •'tef;r rx•Y•d1r1-'^-ta.r fl,► 1 he Fdrnrind-s C l smber Ihr._-year t' t•• n A.% the atteruttnee di-1 not rY;r,. r:-. C.=rrlA-Vt. Sri- +Il �. ;,ie`ijW stiture a quorum. 1117"l'L•nt r) c Nt rrdtrr, cirri,( :r.- G;.ent arri Johnv (lid ,d r,ryt rfrr, :, rrrrr;�,1 a rrFrrt,rr for ,.,rrai aaa Meet Ing- A. W. 11a11, 1xaQ of a v+atS3r This week's meetint' it zwrhed-; n)ntrar-ttnK firm- Bexti a-« ttsr- used for 12:31) torday, follrfwing gents of Firx� .rjdj, ihr frrr 1i-e, - lurch, in ihr hs_ ern,n' roan at i trx dJ� trict- Tie Frill. Thu- other ffwur t-oA.rl nWr.__- rra ,r'- Wrn- 'r Itr.�t,., 'hair -nor:. FC G a:ek, 'tn. Far1T- b:- %ta.r,�r .t4 Grand Officers A l{. ills rradtng rrlr�rted wax Mfl 15 d re+ts aNrv[ testy. while ath- r_ rx weere f r ran 15 to 21j de>�rcex. Visit Rainbwj, , vt ong will r„ at frrr Ix.tt7,n,x pi.xr•s-,• -Lcrac"J. AJ. FaLtorxSx h:tb r;:•ris ryyl ' t7anr r hr } - Whit—r-. whlprx-d up rat the Srrlrwd were tr-autiful for thosf Wiwi had the st.re-nKth to truck the wind or tho- frrtltudr to endure the bitlnr Cold Ski- were rlrar until TurwL�y alrer,•rnon when s-all-r-ring clrxld.q and X110itly higl`r,r temrx•retures Y!ive inrE(r;itinri.3 th.it ihr• fry-rzin{: w•eafhwr would end :,'inn. (•l+:1.1'RRATES 1TFr MItT11UAY '. 'tit, s1w•T y'yr'r i hdxA and the ! (varSfv+lelr C F:dr irJnriv fLiir.lr,• ,1,+e;nhly y:r, rnunity ha!L M,, will hir',r their rvvtd it fn(•r:. # Yotern. 4f Ihr- d,:•'rrrr:r ;,rr in,'�r>n Fehniary d.' .�I ir, ih„ Ct(7r13 8fr rCtA>r•!rd to v.'re at ,',fa,.,nir Temple. Shan :Shaw•}:.), 1hr srs�•ilircl pr>I1in plats s ,m wr,rthy :uf.ur,r• will 'risk+'. rdirated i. ilyr af11c1a1 nr>t <.r of h, r ,.rnr,,il t i�,r to ou: ar,, •n.b:'• Sf•!eCtiofl which 3r)jiearx on traR }1r., helli-ah Williarn- ,our .,-,--w• l pa-e ru- r'th,•r arJt•i uir, u:iil :Itt:-r,:1 !h. Statem••n C4 0( ihr. two Catt[17. rr.(v-t:nl• rind uiiiia!inn tit (';I;,,I� ��*. clatr ir,• rw lii + 1 cm :hn Ann Sall:. s 1'r)n ant • and both arc exprctrd tfr agyar Sar.-lra Thornrnon at a rAiWic mreriny F'rxj,y r•rr- a ----- — n 1 n Z at the. FAnvxulY grade un,"A GIVEN MURAL ti11f)1\'F:Ft awditoriuri, 5F: Larry F•erlaal: Celebrat,-d his 1 inrpnv bnrlal nho,:•r IN)flf T_i fourth birthday tl'Itli ri party, at my �.tr17 1•leanor Joh,inwn t:,%� interracial Group flyhin o hom,• n Friday, January 1f. Game,e were play(-d and ear•h tmal Kit'•n Iasi Fnrlay eren:ti at tn.. horn• of 11r'x 1� try Siu,•trall in ' �. t At Ba_pt,?st C%urehu,,t I'"'tinfled" for a surj)rl_,e park- S.':il tie. At ,c,,,y,,,• „ r� at:r. The fable w'as derorlted in Thirty In4•nr1., 'Di- rlrr'ua colors, with ;t larYf• merry- ttrrr• j,r :.,•nt fn enjoy an rteninj Inter -acid C•aravm" rrpr•-• wi► rround rak,- in ihr• Center, and of rain#-% and thf- op.•rit•,,: ell th-- `'tinting the I>.,ptr!rrxnt of (' t. .y 1' little intlitidual raki•w with a (-;in. many lovely' lrrft., firs oshrnrnts iitui F'rurd!ir-�s of t11.• Wa_,r:,:„s. oulh r11e for ear•h child. %w r,• .ti•r:ed frnrn a t;r,l which inn Piptlst C-oritt- r-nrW)ri will pe urrfl 'file llI(le l•tir-stb, alrcornpanied ua.-. rastefuil r11•r•urat,• f cif.' rh,•nv 'tM •r•nt a_pn,s-ram 5,1rday rc,-nlnt;, I' brrla rY' •t a N. ;Sl Its• hel=1 by their rnofhers, we;e Joan, of it rl.t and 1fi: Al r(t,' �- a pM. :• l'r, . i 1 a(,tr•.t ��h, :it) a_'d P-H Sr.n and David and °•lark Jenu n. Iir•1en and - -- - - - = C'hrIh1i. n F'rwnr!linr'�a 3(ruicws• onaI lfuyh Crven, Jimmy Wjllrarri,•,n. Postal Clerk 4i� ary for 'Raahins;ton St,rtr, Ns.; ( }wrryl Kano. June ;,rid C::rll'IIarrl- Violrt Rudd, 14 in charg- of u, re- Man, Jeffry I'hfllllrt and I-arry'N Years, Retires ;coup wh+rh rr (srewntx kr+.r cis well ;:rrinrdT';irenta, tilt arrt .',iri. W, f) ,ti'i i)ackyrrwrnlx til,-i T11Pvi 1'urke!I Intrltr•d bait tiri;lblt• to 11=,rnfna. Ihr Ja,utn w rr:;rrFrr wer'• tnr:n:x Kf•riny. D->- A1t,•r working 17 tear: for ihr• .)fntrrl•nttend rllf• faJJ,i- will spf'•4r err ter na- tfse•i•r(y J,-nnini'>;. Larry"r Soot, ;(rt 1'r,4r rirr(�e rii•parime•nt, :.itr,.•ldtr-r lof rryh,me. d ofIfarrdrnan, and h1s rittu•r 'Smith rerrrr•rt last monin rn ;r life The ;) 'VIrram will inr!ur!.• mr;war• vrandrn,',th(q, `,ir., 'Wrri Fe-rla4k, r'nd. of Seattle. r,iar• on tnx for'-arrr ;,re n'a1' � F:,Lrlr,nrL., wlx•r,- h.- has 'li:.•,t Inc Iml [,-try of ihr tar;c,tli rarutl bark);roundn. The n; rnbt-n ,a thoi ihr 1);ut 30 'ieary Fe Mew work,-r. tip. (Sins Zrt'larr 9116e tflr•tr {frrr• in tr.t%ejlrW lake Statements In i tt, paftrru tit nr ttu. �.•,iIt11 of- ;1lirirrt Ihr State ttneler the 'tttt{ V-V-% Ur iN- rk•r�rrmrnt 4( C'hnytion •r;r,%I flCr• where �Ir lrntth + tri) as Frwndhrt4-Kx of rkw b4•na)"initz"n (lion Day a rlrrk. held :t party an,t pie,84'nt• rd hmi with a lvattwr '.iateliny bay MirAtst 0mventktn ffir "rnutttw/ 11nd-rmandInx, active gTAx.l will a.a a limn(' -away pr,•wnf acid C'hrttir,an frllowrshry amr,riX 11sejlhrn Cnfr• arrindu,yly. if Fs.eirLr his w'lfr, Ahrr•, Mr. Indmid.1;41s asui trroup4 or aft ma. y'nl in: would Ilk,- x.,nw row blorwl and T}u' Smith has two it,urrh!.-r%. }lr% :iylrra ('crlm.•r of F'wlrn:nd.+ and fi-M-1 arul r•wtal NwkrrrnJruta- }nllrrwing frr5h i(1+ac. ,rw•n tray for rno y'i Mre r'raiv Ciilry n( (:iiam, ;,",I the 'color vrvttt, th,-re will be a _'anal tars' in IN- For the• next thr,w yrura (,ur, two ,zrwirlrhildren church brtsrrrtrnt mein corw-erri In this disci'' will - a..__. iI- ttw• c4n8tnrr I'M'If tfiw hear and Mountlake Te;-race ,•_,_ T(t tilvir the )(mates. num.1wr ,,f artro of j PTYry1T ttrans We car, (r,wel lrl, ohlgln lrJr nnjil„- rnnrtr.y w1 hair WK ill;:.;� li Bids for Patroneige •rhe I!k�hrstcrnrl Ill,ghlaibl1 .,ad lev.lr t1'i Itr;f1,UT�iC� ('(lei p. Y I i!y _kinll (lutes arA ,4.irtin, r1.A•f•Illl.rrl ', 1•a!4 4; aft rni{IfiM•f a1:'il 1n a{rms<rrtr;� a,f1 sncr r '• yfur "P.•rr•hbnfa (,r ihr• n.^N afrrinl r1w,. L•._r,._.__. • - - Packet Pg. 295 ti. • Aar i� -�� wG'�� •;arw,%' .M1 �•.+•u �Je: Y•L ^'.��»r�4h{ •r..+. ��f -•— Y. ^� S. "�---•------i- -ell- - M rw[t'3tih' SiiSiii•briririrea'•l3reu cote-:;r:�ctir.-riri,i+'eY�It.:1S:rr.;2 rfi[g qki.i'te,','[-.��fitll3'�.�.�t"1�'C_5•LNfi45 - . • - __ _3elepf+wec 34Q-X�_w tn',! iI�e^G -- _ pii�Al�i71H"I'1r, !'; tiF?�11,-MPiItC ____ y �IOLt12u�tE 48= -•--L'�?!+i[b`�.iT35:._'Ski _ _ . --•--'--•._----•-- -`�' �, 0 T OVER, P"lLOic1 WEEIt-ENO ! CHAMBER- R5RE' IT • EDMONDS . � d _ o ewrdln�to_+t._pr!yloun un- C,lore..ft_L]Olsl�r, immrrli'+tc• nn:t - The local lied CenCa.:CampaiR,s no,tncrmrnr; thlti �atrcttitiay uitd frceirleat of ihr $i=r;it 1t'C.fiHatliir - - k+Tie-`i epee ti 3u?% �v`� 7flh� V ;p[- tinder"tray-.vrsterday, aimistr, ..S+,ndnr. }rsreh J and S, ,ril; hr 3 p f s • •f�q a . Pr^I?I9[[I--sn'�.f Zeus L7ua 3 of Cvmmrrc,'. oils ate the rinei cal " �7Q i{ a f� VVV OW end ari`EdmOnds goal ' Sf:r1011, :.rkearin�-nµ dny-r.;n file Edmond+ speaker gt• the ditnser merilnF of � ', �r`. E�'. - r4lrLnteCr'+•or•krrR,vilS hr as't�rk [',liy rnrtt• the urnonds OWNmbcr n[ Com-. V hrvuf It \Torch •i❑ in an.rftart _to 7 l,ortlon . nS the - vuuthitrvt Qi [ [+3j(je 1;+;i[ S+v[ a.l�roltrrti +i rn rrgc:n+: I rsrrrrr of--the:pork In my hr .torte .at the LC116R h:,31. 'xllurs-.� }f R&•3 Y w last ,re+lis nrfidtt [S'ra[4el+it!nr, u each nur:gael• -�+day rveaing• �farrii `.+. accC+rding L,.aAt.yCar the SVC:rI Red Ci+pss rlrnn•d rRr rxµundfne [aeliitsr+. rfrn::c In fi'nnL of 'f"FIr Grill nrr 11:,+n W JislYlct f ale air 1o:3,Si37 fntn[lirs. it ;'n,t �r� intrrrslr,l in rl+r to �'' 1i+ln t{all' ['1i`rirx,+'"l s'tni commit l+: 'I'iiv hunrtnF lrr ra>•;:rCr7 ln. the Ill iY C: ';tl''•�.d l'rlra 11i5 ci:;' rrnsnrii a+ .viFh $!1.[x+7.00 s[.tni in their Titurn- ritg- µrrlc :urd It. 't".allinvist• Till ,ntvga.nm of ..sale, ;n+n.itled i. tinr,tt:a and lzn;u•orr•^,+k-sks ai: iirmer:•rtF fsvim 7 I,arii::unnnu,r;• Q :ial aid: 3,S92,tvr,ti'axex[+e.drd.in fining ;r clv"rint hnl Head join h+. hii•It schnr+l sltu!e11 ,t:11 pre•' the Crlrphano tiurvtc+ tntnp+,»v. thief a 7+:vsday C 'niny wst}l th•t hits �[-+iCtims-af lhC Skregil t olio;• y„nr n,•i> hhur� nn lhir u[•ra+inn. ttdr the adClt' ss. + snfi•f+ic' ,.LsrY[:h 7 l s 5+:t;Ylr ksu+ i9itiSa:t�:l +lnC l7an�+•cl+ m 51an+•,trxS [load+-Lhc ksratl. chnp[ur {utfr+• +sill hr reeved -[rev. to. flrkrrs Tuc' s!u• •?inaer. +„ .tK:! snra ',•rurr:!i A t• I' l:tn, rrncriwt of pt isli son veld +,'luu r,m 1+nnl also carried on r-.icnlir�r aid, • ,tnrkrtK only'. ter, rrl at 7 p'ckoc} u' ,s } inn I i sr ro;r••,gt+p - cram -el; Ur �StC ihtlon unmtu,srrrl-chat feu} 1'. suimmins. and, saclnG clas�rs.l ,uxillar}'. are. ix:nc! �il,i I)} mss:-� sa 54 n[ tltr.iSrntha[7 rl Gatrq. SnrrnSCn• Stl}stsshan_::ranslxyri++" i tialivnally, th.n lLrd'Crocc xat'c , bees o[ the Chnm*+rs S cl..:til u- This, nte:,s�af;r his_+ }cut hrcn tion ''r - cn aisscial, ,icl: the nr:u I.L n relief and rxl•nbilitatinn srnict� In1A=v rprthrr[ from Utsrn C:hcrkr. tlir, site s+'n:s nut er,limb. sustKdrl:lr' So- � �15 persons, sf,rstdsnF ''Ii3i I5 MII4I5 F3i + _._.r.�e r3rairnacsc of the' tS°naliinFtr,n becaorm chik!rnn ++nand lx ot,lli;•-r O total of g�.biP,2r10.UC+an thisal•,re.l pk r 1p�ii';:7'('ittT`Cti'3?![SC�: '?uhlitr:iervlec'Goron'lavinn: Yrrrn:nvi-and ieasc t?le-ifiuses:••'+ Y.9•k:r;H3t1`-+'Mrr:sn x-fnm"rlicr--Kww-f 1� Jl�,ti �= ��}�'� '�{�' I''f honE- of .nn r•::taitlishtu+,nS s,•h w'•10Hided .by local .chapters: �539;90G tsc11, l;crl r'"ok+ rhairntan i lsnrd licinor is , ttsslYtted- :pints of bkaod TecoAc¢trd torFjaCk L� ** y �1'. Craw, in cant of 5 b,-- atilt Vie �li:{r( " 4i�43�1� i loehn+c tree=[nr d!stribut o.: nt n rust u[ "tVhat Ts yian"•Rev--i4prmuss W-hc iCinKYCrnsnty sine. is lxings� r �vadi-�y �n 3C1d ste[p+r th. ro:ut V s� 3Clll,gon.txi. tion .{,osod laY She., _ rrtin church of 1 timands. in an in%Ire r- lo'vinpt larfirs wh„ are• :tr•: ss: a . sc • ° ' � I�rl - - f Cil' ., `.•ay t!ta! hr : t'l1e':he4L n All In all, th•• Rod Cross is do- 1'uivnvn. pastoc•.ssf the : irst Baptist';�ggisted i-t-sIt-il;.;'r !•7. the fnt••1• ar>r�..-. E n ;;,at Else !u itig •a tvonderr11 job in No 9 captains: }fro-. tC. L iiarri= of coif ;lace asking, disasicrs and •performiTul..otherll girt; address to the mcmhetx oC the. �lr..•'I7ss,ri ,�'I,i:- sera lee+ for th,nae who are mare Edmonds Uor;s club at The Criil, Tti!h �`htsan; �_ illMi` +_ F:sr ; I sy�lhc h inwssCl.Y+rt r �� that i r^n+a 1!{e n n1,1 tls.twillrS'r d unfortUnnie. lhna mast of u4. ;LondaY evening- ntrastrd the hu- afro: Fr:rnccx Anti+•:^••»+. +'ksn h.rs+,Ic,y errttissg for the . e+rrclin;�•s?,}.� 11. sf:e'.c �rntls,n[mr:kSst�triy lu fjo;: .. It w!tl save time and Pfrvrt K stir. 8Bev"n co [he Slrrrhomiir[, (:o+u+t}• Ynh11C s p ix •! O shvNr who +,7m[ to .contribute man ftasatres' and the divine an-II1LY[he FdmandxsSx „s,t„tfic�•. srrK]tl+ fly i7Lsmlet of z :i5 r+lr<)-wil +111., ink� rt•'. [:n.W• fiarrlwnm. a1S++ n,' to jwo,,1d mail tlsrir' 11 1ks.• mode drsrr in man's cookout and dLd a:ati+as• des 7 Ire rn•I h!' I]x• w!lkin Eltal-',hr bus tn,se. recnai O payable, in the American Red Claud that the hvfo of the worldfflflfllflfl rye{x arenuel HI (rme dri+r is' 1 Crass. Ln Jack Tuell, ilex 3 2, F.d i!rs in Liu recognition and de%01- ,in trap.-JTacch.t to i[1. tstilit?', facing nn i'=n:tls :++corn tr it 1++'R' r.t locatissn en B'tft lopmviit ❑[ the latter• lsnnviceu. Ltosu,u :nsr1 tt:+arras }+•cnu.: 'vhr:rrit ism: hero b:r tT' ..�mends.x @g I st ts:x+ }rays. _■ in this aye of the Rmlrol viGa!ir�t s'Yod:'�' sirer[s.T. ��� ���� forces which could tvifte out cit- iii i •r 1}atioli�tsfsp [I1 h+Kt[+rictlCaliitlon lilt, ys:aJI 'T�ciel, tltn[1}li; uti5tlZ'ale lie s• 9i illzation. the rttinister itoinitd Out, §3tt L' qu a Planning q that recognition of .the 'eve. �d[Sf FJ '`�i ni�R ��+L , the -prnlxrty' owners in the .area. itlrnetl to the :�i:t!1 a,['nu; 1n;; y Chamber fV[��Ililpr NCO hratherhood of man and fatlu:r- t+�a prrsentrd the cout,ril.last lion ftihil far utsnt a attar fi t] hna[I' of Cali is-isltv our +'er] Sri Gates. 83, tntms�et. +:d "plc a^d the special nserlirs [Itix and uncilr ithdSprou1 NlLutnnr•- existence. rincipal %tut:klxoldrr nf. the l [i- '�'esd� was. [.lied -for :t ltexrsnl Cs:unei den Sproule litnrt-..mndc.._:s .r:at,a++ .that _ls - Plan." -for •rntoil "tiiiiFZ'thF meat= cC !n hrclub t ar voted t o con• eP}tone Srn•;ce cvml�:cny, ltc'Ksrtl vn Rr y in-+tr[cnsc of ihr- lie- +, ac s nc+fv+: l,t:. Ycxri:+drel u+ ` hers of • the Snohomish County n'vay from a henrt a[tact, Tuesday ; tit ion were anly' twd Ia•ople, t• rs, ilsnr she. 1,us Yhnc ire cFsinSlishi � Chamber b[ Comritrscc. scheduled .tribute S�a to the hearth of- Dimes Kefr .+'ho perstnicd it laxt u.rk, [rum a ltvint,apputitr ti.e snot � La meet at Edmonds on' Allril II - rampai�rt and S7a to the feed Cross fnF atv the Kirkt nd �Charnlmr OF oust corner aL the I:r+nv :iardx;• ' tvere'discussed a[ the •'Ellmoitds drive, just startingg. _ k[e, Ind ,Ars.,CAv, 1{rrrrp. ChanSlser, meeting, at The Grill, Viee-President 3seic Swan �''as arbusinrss had to CaSifornin tVm Sisa:v, Ftimnnds manager rxs .ding north f0.['oi ;end ih r The ToSrpltnne Sr'rt[CC campanY' for tits L't;A, mid :hat rite •utlilfy' the preze-nt waif.ing yhelfer bc.t lust TftursdsL+ noon: presented +tith a medaltivn and a s ,srntlrl itiafec ever riivrt to eiim ' moved. ibis mdiion .v2s &"'rnrld President F, G. Calvin named paperweight in reerygnitinn of Ira' opera[a: cystrrrtx at FAmunti.. F.rn?r "olio., 1 'II. t3rsdbury: and in> abtamed new. memttcrx. f thrli, iClrklund. Yedmoni] end •Hare tat f•a sthlc abjectionaillc hu• t:as in5mesfiicl•:l} "fnlSm3ed• Eothe [ca[ures. isr the substation. The :r sretie. !y CoUnCIhY+3n•-Tssrl Newton Peter: sn as a committer President • "Sark' Cl3fLOrd air . t to make arTarycrnettts far rite at pointed Charles Brown miitee fir. 'rotes.:c tole"bona on ineer,transformt-ram ++'ilk be:in5tailed nn th:: it he tabled hntil tsI me x tale. •,rt�' rnan of the pia and leader m t{:r itt.i^lkntioni.eel-ithe hack of the lot and +till bit inl: hcea+lse-F fut].cnuri!13 tear. r Liu It was. suggastcd 'that it' the £arfy ticket axles far the dig a phone field since tl`+r late '90's. i::urruurdrd> with a Aiea µ°th Mann i]einFntaixtent�ci'Tt�iS santioc w t weather uwerc fat -able the mom- Talent' Show aYdt C7o h Y. Fetal way p�itienE o[ the tiros tingtoa - iw Will 6c kandscup� brrs:might 1s+ invited to came to to he staged Independent ;ielephrsne gRpeia•1ant :•t�ruhugh le all' lineeo will SB Se; .'voting itnm:t [a,'Or.-,+a C her%dnds-:f.: the--aflcrnoan far- a audiwrium, .ATsril 5, and 7, 'were _ enter tltrorigit: rive alley, , rr� special .salmon dt0w Or. a short reported as'starting aft well: Sack t�R native a€ Iin'- ley, Osiiu, i:- into thr.'city ismtl I{a1mc5 Curlier 4'ullan, War;iSvner; 34IC Ciirrnexs o cruise -on the, soured before the Swan, chairman. of the Plan hie career witrt the Ccntrni �by „a}' of Hltd.ut' Street. Irstal- 1IThe original- li. motion fir: i dlaner' tend piogram ; in the eve- committee. said that about ten began a 7is ioarcer company of th?.- latinn, he said: Will he CO'"Pletcrt .The nrigi.si- motion . [++red s alas». :..: Interesting and varled•acts by la Bell System at Indianapolis. I'1'=;this s mqr for lite snereased dc-. I?ettvr. w':th.onlyfor - I!=ekrr nnd•� tl--yfmr+e-�Crxrin{t��nnnunetd eat talentaAxterµan lateral end ma• Seto +eattic in 1.973 ens T!,'as rtsar+d ttll3 tnakc its use-impPrttirtC G t o[herpcougncilmotat:t> ann =. +' { a Secretary lack Tucli annount ,:� 4 assocsta i[ttfth,' tcilic ri, 1Ly+-shirtrSalL•svhcn L•i3 511ft+pied. -• C.ouncilmtiri fie �=iti3la7; .s ' filar ne`icc had been Leceit'ed from sictan. musicians and dancers.. a and Tclegt nth carp 7. �t' lr+sat 20 per' cent rrture poi' rust 1 l pile serti3ce commis- Dr. Faul Burke reported on the ��y t�� ha ti?,Ytcn.. ;+ r •e: s "ill he used in 'tile disiriet. than l::cr, )laid out alone. ag is the sea e, Pu lans. of" the committee for the 'Vest Coals Tel:• 4lam rail, ••: _k•s�:4CLfoa.- h:iicvinr lf'::tt a aeon of a hearing to Tsc hold On P ;ITcd „'ith the the, affairs. of [hc Tele0honr Serv- kidA tit' r tc ��> a uUoyrd or di- Phone ram;krny as vice -are ident ` Arlie 'Siefert, former council- p r•;,!c: should, irate lxetl SivCr i_ per company noel Tucaday- rrtw'n- [ in rhnr:•'-af uT�+rryti?"s mill. -Wired with fire t,ru tnctr::r,- i+r:rrtss ilirn inllted simpy .li iny;,'farc}t't• ns, la o'Clnek: ate the rrCSors Callvwetl•wlse c1 mcrfing. In lh.: c:+rly..i11'e. be purt-hum'..:•Inr psnper[y ewr+crx lst urrin=i:.lu[L I I tvcl;k'F nrr3h11 su: trYs:tns; •'Stntr +'str,'+l-S'lntldl'ts;• I}exter and she fin=Troll .,-irjF'1WAe :[tsa tnt::ri .17"rt, hr ,mari•r ro fisul :' Ir�,m less. able. m011on• riot -rind l s AIohh, .4eatt*' - [�ili&!t ��� � �a the ,li lsnu' lesel+ho,tc sy: fens unl lrfeuira6it ::Sic pests It• :ash:n:iiiias. L:n'.'. ]'. Vpl hint 'irtCksrs^rsesd $ail i kscarin was posiptined in-� . else• P:tlritn,:dti lutlevt•c;d+nt . Yl Ile.: 14m ing. 'in elfect, Vivcn tire: I'tr v7+icty:; far lit and' Vs'nF6un"r. i -milt 6 IlI definitely yesterday hecau5e Of the N�� �©�� �� s S+fwne Cn. llr pusYhssed th IiiF� Te[ gourd va! f coed LK.L) Cam- Cteae. 4 had ng.pcll tiding dcaih: of .Earl Gatos.' . 11 I land.'f'clepllonc: cn:npaKy !n 1tD"' n ,ny . nPprnva? 'for the 'S+rajtct tr stead of caseing'ihu deciding I year a u lashfal}, ]foyer TSR"al6han.sa{a tUat hc'i .Ttec6i`t:.af a letter- from: tier and [,toy Years up;o tOrmedi '[face g [..[• mcmbei4 o1 -r State-ad•-rrttsing. commivsian +vas Edmonds^ riremcn • ti�rr• tailed Telephone Servict. cornpinnY u•ish:iS; llse ropssteil lest that the, Attla[ion Pe 1 `{fa]" ttutharity ?a' in. do. at reported.'indicating that -this area�out at •abcul 1130 last -Thursday this year embrriec[i sin a. SS•'30: it,-y5 .unrhnnyri. Becat,4 lsrt[rr dreiared:the nsntion lost `ucca be would'tre:;given.grcaier Cnnrider- morning to wairizuish a fire ill -the 000 expansion pro�r'asn. :iya>,+•er:faeiliticS he Ile arc sa-ur;.•rnt of a. tic vote: y • to ation Orr future state maps, 'fain sss'ert Cracsing over _tile ' lie was a-memltcr. of the ANTasun- and because un only ta appeared to rn4 :'1`he'[uiurc of,,the-Edmunds.ferri• Gr•enE:Norrherst sidetrack: - ,ic lodge. the Shrhre.,the I{ir}claCd `,prntcgt -the :.crier. tits council men &I�6 � C : n crrtice and Condition af-ihe;'prrF-, The-ptlankimr had ignited from Chamber of'Cormnerrx, rite Lv--exp+�•sscd Tile opinion that lurthrr $ LL r+rG.yrbarCMere, f1isN65Cd. Atiaisi:joi4 +u'hlclx•. leaked; -from spit loco- tart' ,:lard• ttsn Iritikexverd Gnit rlir}y dcla� , »csld slut ire. ;'+stifled:. sl •o-_. t,...-. . asp. anm'.tif'thc Zh3�li7C+^ts•a5 altered 1 t'iipti,'c o .: a ,tuck-tFa'-%i Ri1rl'+s•hrn' and LhC•'L'rest7yzct•3un• hurch.• - :-1;>zyor ]in.ib'.wtt'st:[Levi-tiiat :K)s 1,,�t the:, rt+•con+missioO in,e[Tnrts, !tc leaves Icis,wi€e, mrs. Aldir'• dicati7:+ should 6".rnridc.for eatt- I. a. sri: I+d ttte•locomntivc .,t;cs moved to Per- Mr . i - -on; deltaif. of Continued Semite• - mit the firemen to 4 eBcn the hlarm. Gates. heed three tlanl ht?rs, 5• : [t^:ctinn pf L!:c sutstMiinn, sxs,deY the Cnginr. itself was found. to be- da5clris tValiers. Srartle:• 'ds-s; s _rnrlspons 7[ .`•�'ction ll u[ „rise 't 1e` Packet Pg.�6fack LL'ocxls. 'Qua F:S,a is o: =::d • city iiuildinw csydr. 'b t et! +++f: iNK.,SCt7it�:Leue[S'- tO ' afire: + 1Teror 7tcL"it+tsrsn '..erred L ' 1'..in[ir A[r-- Fivwnsd York t nsta I 3. • 'awn- •.... aa_z.1v.,--./:...i tidwnr�+we�r - o ,. - ...... S v . ,c• xs:n i�;K{ :'•t+! _.,_..... tr.✓a rn,«c kinti,�til. and , it : he .+. .. , i riDune"Keview an Area Between Seattle and Everett, Bordering an Paget Sound Price 5 Ce ft SH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, TH[,:RSDAY AfARCl1 Salmon Derby to Start April 1 i April 1 has been set as the crxming day of the qualifying New Police Patrolmen Employed By City Roy Bryson Iron! lit. Vernon has been mined 1,'r Ma ysr F':rul McGibbon as patrolin.lrl to replace Spring Water only New ' period of the 1951 Edmonds Com- I munity Salmon Derby, Larry Sel- Ifaaken Wall who h�,.d resigned tilr- Bryson has had corLsiderdble d��Ufee for pity lers, committee chairman, an- police experience, having; served nounccd yesterday. as undersheriff of Skagli county With the failure of the third Complete information and rules for about five years, te`, well to indicate any a,.ailabde •' of the derby will be published in lie plans to bring his family to water. search for suirsurlaee wa- the Tribune- -Review of March 22. Edmonds after the close of the ter on the city's 40 acres .ras Committee members Include present school term abandoned by the water c'soarmit- KcKi Curry and Cecil Francis from -- •--- - tee of the council, ChaIrman T. the Lions club, Ltg;ionnaires Rabe Seattle orranist to M. Tucker reported to the crxavrg esrn►ng_ Bucklin and [loft) Ingham, boat- TLiesday house operator Jim Thayer, and Bill Crow Edmonds '""` Ida p# �. monds With this requirement of the state health department out of merchants of and Bw• ill Geltz of Alderood Man- -�^�~^-�'�- ""-ter the way. fir. Tucker said that the or, along with L. H_ Bradbury, William Bunch of Seattle will way is now open for devek4m-irt last year's chairman, in an advis- present an organ recital in the of the surface spring water. ory capacity. First Baptist church of Edmonds. The cacnmittee plans to submit I • Sunday evenings, March 11, tentative piam for tt-tirfg the twee 1IF.ETS MAR, 16 Mr. Bunch is ory;ani`t for the settlingc basins, for [altering the IOiiTifOf'EDIC Central Lutheran church of Se- water, chlorinating it and Puntp- The Edmonds Orthopedic Aux- attle and demonstviting organist ing into the reser%o4r• to the state iliary will meet Friday, March 16 for a Seattle organ firm. department for appro*.ai before for a 2 o'clock toa at the home Josephine C. Cunningham,tio- preparing the detailed plans - of Mrs. Z, V, Leslie. 2nd and He'll. prano, will he the .00isting artist,' McAl of the Fars' already has Assistini; hoslesses will be Ml-s- with Mrs. Ray Shawley as her. been xithdrawn from the tent F.ionel F'row•n, Mrs, A. N. Sanford accY)mpanist. wells, and work Ls to start )mmr- and Mrs. I.. f Orrlanrl- The First Parmit churcti is diarely an surging the present --•- -- pmud to claim he-r iss wloist. lferl'Arlfs and dr•selr4)L X 11w Krvatr�t HEAR -NOTED SPEAKER ex•fx'rienced artistry Is the result 1 pr s,ible 1kr-4• fvr the m-ung; t- Mr. Tucker An inter(-sif-d group from Kd- `"f mriny yetirs ay a singer in ra-! • dio and motion pieta es. vier, said Sale of a strip cif lased ;.)t) by L3;f rnonds attended a lunch( -on and 'IIrs. Cunninwharu was solai-st I feet in dirrsengions to Al J. ATMes meeting, tifxinsored by King Coun- for the Magnolia Avenue Christian I for $466 on terms was auth,orizJt�d, ty Chapter of F'ro America, last church Los Angeles for several AX- !with Councilman Gomm ',erm Friday at the Women's University -of years, and during her work in I well, who ob)ected to the term Club, when the featured .maker liollywpoxl sang wish such names i provision, voting against the rn(r was George Washington P.i'_)bnett,' a. tielsrJn Eddy, Grace ;tifooryt•, leis. was submitted who addressed thegroup on 'The Gladys Swarthout t:nd others. A t,.ritten offer I Trend to If•ft in Education." - This concert will he the dedica- 1 to the council try Ur. a )di S f Mr. Robnett, noted journalist tioJn of the Kerr Yemorial Wur- J. Strance to (I - A a steep LAK and lecturer, is executive director litter Organ. to the city for street purposes in of the Church League of America 'National The p mg;ram, whirls will t)egin exchange for opining an exten- Fourth avenue and gra,d- and theLayman's Coun- at 7:30 n'ciock, will he as follow: aeon of that it would drain their cil, and is making a tour of the country, speaking on the dangers I Chil, t•rrlud— Ranh „ i ing; so 1 property, along; with a waiver of Of Communism. I call to The-, 1f,rd J,s'sa Chri.t J_U, Joe •.[ Man'. D";rina 1s,(%er connect ton regwrern�'t'its. city, it was reported, airrady Local ladies attending were the Riora-ion Camps �-1-he has tentative aruld Mvv. lam(•s John MacLean, Gef)rge iSmart, Mr. bunch II do the , wlleret7y the county ►roukl do the b W. T. «'flue, P.oh(-rt Ash- Arthur Schultz, Robert Lind- Mir Ilrart Y.wr Faithful tiarh Haydn Kr -ailing- The pr(gKnil w'az :•x- . y The :iplrit'. +-nk ferrt-d to the street committer say-. F. W. '1iacL)f)nald, P.ay Meyer ci) ! tl.d t aural. I.rn l.,.h:.r Han.i.f' w,ltF] authority 10 C(XLStIrTUT1at@ the itnd Walter It. Storm, f Mr- Cunnmrr;am [ ransaet Kin. • I ► l tX�rarxc Handel I'hil Allen, represeritla; lose '1() If()f.n tic 1 Art>: DANCEtart.. i•rarrr .(i,thic R.,rllman fife drp&z1jz"I, JAJ" the city Mr Ruwh to prepare deep sh0%UkC tie The Esperance Square Dance iv i e`,jh mo or house numbers for are+ Club Will hold another of its with Vrr,l=:r. Cad -The r+rntH,r , Haydn l of tllw. drImrtZlrwat U b-o hf„�Q +opsare danres on L1vdn(,-Aay e1'e_ Mr+ Cpnntrmf,..am Lttii?��f7 err ;il•*'A IA dry. Calms nisi;. March11. inctrurtirin fair �` I crn.fr 11-WI 11 1[e wrred that tb~ rat t!(•w'('ornerx •.vill ,marl at 7:ati t,y �t ndenfr ("ante r.�lr ,F",.0 r;f yympManY) dres alao rtYM for u&nw Of the Mr,. rind Mrs. Jack F:obin.,w 1 w't r sr,iltran otsu at of tbe) bomw to aid b • t�•,t rh..r,i Its twatioa. TO r-N-rERTAIN GUILDMrLr'un<n Mayor t'aul McGibbon reported Fire, Spiritual.: that gritted protests had tPt•en Mel. Ckywg;e Wrlghl and viral, �-SAe]C-r r,..,, Kure, arranrnt t,r Jahn rtaritr -c"�-^=�-'_T-=='= _rJ.i.r.r..s:,a„s.i- ma& to the state legislature on itihirh rAvrl1 will entertain the Aid J jatron wvuid Baptfat Women'x Guild, Tuesday Jam— Y. D r,.r weer Y v Tt-r.' ill w craciA.d, ar- haVe reduced the city's legal levy (.-vening, March 13, at the church. ranrrd ! r ch-ri.-. a�. nn+,, � from 15 to 13 mills- fir saui than All mr•mtwrx of the church and Mr.- cunniri-hem the need is apparent ,for a careful their frknda are cordlally invited vrr Study of City rrvrnurs. T„rrata in I) M,tHrr Nrvt�u I - ri t1 • — Cit Ckrk Anita! use rt Mw�dt:atr..n 1Tl,ai.t Jt►oa.tnK � y Voters Reject Mr.flu-,i JX.>rted that r•rpairs to the PoLicec Packet Pg. 297 •- I ro.rduring t amounte•d to 6.1.f December 20, 2003 Ed Ortner 17216 — 73`d Avenue W. Edmonds WA 98026 Hello Ed, Thank you for the information about the First Baptist Church of Edmonds and old Edmonds on Saturday, November 8, 2003. This letter is a backup for your information. If it is correct, please X(sin our name at the bottom of this page. FROM THE INTERVIEW ON NOVEMBER 8, 2003 Ed Ortner: Born in 1920 in Seattle WA Moved to Edmonds WA in 1929 Baptized at the First Baptist of Edmonds by Pastor W.H. McCall (1924-1933). The water was cold! One of your Sunday school teachers was Mrs. J.H. (Alice) Kerr, the first woman mayor of Edmonds. You remember her as an older woman, widowed and with bad eye sight. She once wore her dress backwards. The class laughed at her. * See the attached Tribune -Review newspaper article dated Demember 19, 1924, for visual confirmation of Mrs. Kerr. Please return the article with this letter. You thought the best pastor was L. Beal. He let you open the services, help with communion, etc. He was the first person to live in the attached house to the church. A special time was driving to the Paloose to pick up J.E.H. Nelson (1943-1949). You and your friend traveled all day and you had him in Edmonds that night. A lot of people geeted the new Dasto.r! The First Baptist Church of Edmonds was remodeled in 1949-1950. The only original_ walls left standing were the north and south walls which continue to be part of the: existing structure. Years at the First Baptist Church of Edmonds (1929-1984). Seemed like the church was always struggling, it being in a small community with older people. That comment was in response to news of our recent merger. He attended the church until a job change from shoe store owner in Edmonds to a bus driver. Thank you for your time, Ed. And God bless you. Thanks for the pictures! Judy Livingston. ALL THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT. X Packet Pg. 298 6.1.f c 0 E w 0 L V r Q m M W r 0 L_ U- tm �L V U r Q Packet Pg. 299 'r Gruit:ing Siilnrilart Arpfir}tttvr:cn -,irattly +md Zverert, 13+:rder.,,U ..11 17ug=r ::m,*uf i+rif3a ii C"h-A - 1 ,r70 19Sp• � rISI�li4EH IFi t3NOS.-SwO tole.iLsWCOUNT-Y. -,yASF3rz+tCT0N.:THURSDAY. �1i lit KAWA -WILL, as NEXT MGM.'a" _,r }�' t + ,•- 1Z�arSti}3 [nr lair Combat s-4601' ;l a . butl}:et t as rt. r ..,• . w'•>• u : nint;. April •24: tliv tantIIILAI rm aE She Irindcl'1;arltrn SL'rL5 rz !,proved, douuje•51i1{[h,l: or Jrl'iidC Sahel S - pp _ it' _ Il& irt'�ctttlti,iF +pith the ,jhlYd .. grade wAti iltttllllri%ett Ai ihC oChOa[. imard n,eetinK at Olt! high sellool buildhlk 1 1 n4 W',nln.'xel+ty .•.,...lull. . i]i#arCltcr•s of obi++inn ,:e++k•t) - .3 }r•, .r aI'aund the ore at whirl, double- - ::Aiftlnrl -!wail!! :-1f,r1. Arrinulum. C: +�; �Ir•• � el.tvilu•r i:. f1. .�ll,rn- ctiurleltdistg "f � IIr:H it x'npRl he Ir::ra iS:rnal;Ir11: ' lC1l IL7d .,•':il:.:.if it lullfhl IV d,llrl• Q,.•flrv;Ii IO 1hr 'rsrnyl fntlr 4;r:4d•r., •l a t tthilr *lr:.. C'• Iir 11_ Trtler. haotstk 7 s • eirrk, !od 11it 1014 to climfaAt+: `1,e t�.f [ lower I,ra'4':: ftnit •laplllc-shi[! ng - - �. i q ' r �� ba•ca{ttie of the lsarnrtf$ to nmR1i chlldre:+ lrat•irltt Itnmr, l>t ht.e day- ! tar Day -when they 71,o picture At right ehan'+S :4arna of the._nh:or yo.fwgrtr.r an tha. lis:3lt or rntumlitlt neon durit at __ __ .... _ ....._..� -.dmontl�Caty-rark; —'�'S15;r+al 5t'!u."�F.tYhi.xS-flit}• seurupattrt down the,, hunk Inca the elate alli;ht •apriril •:linter n,ontfss" •ft are: shown. aome park ,t yen to hunt. for -prize-winning a fie_ Anil. of-Ecmr,rn many . Sttperinleiltlenr Glen G. Hill rtr- •- -- -' L rcaert•ed for tl_cm. rnothcrx and dad:l +acre a1wt1; Rea. frhutax.by tf.Xilrcy- S;etr.J - - nmmendt:d that douSlle-,chilling. • . ' tars wit IS Oil, third tirade. add tIlil: . was adot+ted IY,: a th4'I.•c to two - afetxs APRIL s i$eQ� @� Pn¢��l���ary UrDL•t:E 0A.SOLLtir. 1311CM., vote. direetor5 -NICK. Toltec. hill. + b t tel'I E. iNla$ ' Intl A. lie 3rL[11ar adz Cftambxr.of Co m- p g y 1'hC ,,,vice stu+in::s of C.d• t'ottng ill its f3snr. l'inits (l aicaFan meet ntx[ Thursday. ��QYiF d]S �1183>i��9 Yit��ip mends tattle art' an,altsncing +i ! r• lose: T. rats ltnd Rttdulpll G. VIM- -ill lcshm-af..t.-.Vo xnl!4-a-r:aIloll--h,. -ik ntiking tIistt-- tile fr..ully_l�c the -!trice of y;ruapli,tr•. to nn;el b> rrLctlyd'-d its glvell ill nrxniYfF•-'4i _ ,'Mt.."�.... The nr% well north of Ihr city', highway cn,nf"Aition• wit it Shr• rrl•t'rt alkt'iCr Pt edsca- •• promises a -good !Iota of satisfat- P� fnrK. - eery. trater.'accordirig to a rrpol. r-Discusse ► Tlu board toted um,nlrnonmly, to by•the water committer. chairman.4 >Si �t��tj � �$ } w T tit. TUckcr.:tf t11c Edmonds ci!} i' rx:,tinue t:tic kiarlerF;arten.-cixssex. had Bands n thlring Me ca„lin19-9 horll vear. council mceting at the cit}' i:[Ili ��rr && r 1 !r^ - , TuexdiY crening_ .-. e7i�� �� 6i�:{ii'i,iti ti ky[tk Tht' dates Cor ul,urt :bail igttin- . my of sr:a'•:} nv:re :',•! on r�W, fst aril county bond issue FIe said the well note is flladuc• ;;v and June t. fnt rood building, was ing a steady floss• of•425 gullatir n At a ronihmed nlr•Aing bt Itsc lfnd Ju cteliitt. Agr11 2f, nr t the meeting a1 the, minute and thlt flee diicoloraIloll LYItnwoiI d C'omnm-ial and Corn- 9�3U e•cl- in lUmlil 21 .Of the ttAmher of f ortmerce has t raduall3 Jcercasgd „tram the munitY c1uhS.' ;lInntlati rotates;. i1 �dmgn[It l[if;h whoa! huikiing. -As an hall, last Thstrsdaty original a0 points to 26 pointK- wg,; vott,d to offer tilt 1I•acr. Park ::et Cor Z I'Llblic hearitig on thr. tit concern 'expressed This complim with stale require- site at LynawoW to School D's• ::ot teal hudxrl :end n r[q!y s,f the ,4nee that this district manta and the state 14calth depart' iric 15 frty: of ellat„e I'p,• use as ,irnuallFJ duel t tt'as prolni cA-the u:L share of such roads. went 1FRg Kiven its approval tIy a Silt fo[' tbic junior It#I;h �rlulpl--- itibunv-[Z`•Apw fat, Infl+licntiot+. _ ,Ilan reported h$ving samples suhmitled for analysis. - provided that ctio%lrtlelion is 1r•- While avail lb;v. funds werc:.txtut county -wide meeting As the now is not sufficient. Ion- gun Within ftt'a years :+nd trastp+lct- � 0D0 ahn+t of the total h+tageteh• Ic Everett Chamber of der terms a tim contract ivIII& the red b}' five years. tltG be ice W:Is •:;'<.ily". ere that. i],;A - at which the• lead JAnnsgn DhIllne company. the The tract is farmer stale school 'as favored, but ,pinion Council accented Mr. Tuclrcr's irc- sand ahc u[ Gn[1 fret rust of High- cy+lld log gUtai+xYt treat {r eciAl o whether sAch marls ammendnfion sisal a new contract tray' F19 anti earth of sloe ,Nldrr Ssulds rather :L:uI by a sprttiaL ancrctc or,,,%nous- or aend)tt, it- Ling the drillers -an- nood tY.nrrrtc 1>rncl. rtrcnlly put- !cry whtrit. rveuld rtif[rit s Chou[ Avem,iis. mber Volcd to urge ether 120 days to- drill another chased by the Lynilwowi orge-Q- i;th, �rh},rx Ask ,.tilts tvnk loner Larry Ga- 5, It in the same r'scinity, carrying iatinrts with the idea of tont"e4-01IP' t gro,ai7 a, xeioai hit; drivL: ❑nd_;Ahe County ('hum-- similar_team5 as-.to_`gu0.tttniced "I-.. ^ at Darrington llfay 9• titre !loft, 'and prmiding- for Tar I for an Snrmx c In wages from tilt- j tad question will be the mediate payment of W.100. City Places Order for proposed lilt] an hour to $t.5ti,• { epic of dIxMsion. . Originally ".500 nas auggestcd e r T along Whit seniority conaldem- •estlon was made that eta the•amount to he paid upon ac ��� g�'L't a Q"�y r°t7�Je i - tp forni or noverrlmrnt ccpIance of I1ie present well, but lions. assure for:thls area its TI)c zaacl+ers' >;rrn4fs uus in- 1]ettr+ Leyda. in the audicmce. in- Contract for 200+- fret o[ 6-tact formed that provisinn had !teen to share of rand Eunrls Silted_ that ;tx the. drilbers. were cement -lined iron ssatcr pi.e. at madi, In the bud mt for the ttdr Mcalnness..Sir(dt coat- delivering a tvell • apparcnl}},pra: 51.36 a foot dOlvcrctl, mttl 1 ] ft. mxI inerrment in Leachers' salaries , • ; . . irman of the ell coon- during -only thrtr Of[hs- a[-lhr of-8 inch pipc`ast-$3 r8 ' fooYtras far the clmlinf tc sn. if'sle rare 6efng tuiren amount trontracted for, only three- n+i•aidrd h>' the cis :Quart! Tugs- Lzirt+f X'rl n Cpnr,IderM XUZU ,air of Thled avenue by fifths of the dott•n paym+Fnt pro- day evening to- the Pacific Coast 1Lr. 4j L=ei_ 'trpartltl the, Cohn- - cill-eottipahy and that vided 'in the original coniract. Iron Pipe company. The price in- n%itter rrlL lint the prim of. $1,- 6ts n'odld be repaired should be poid•ai [his'tlme. eludes delivery to Ialmonds and = art acre for the lioltnes Corner as pOsSlble. Councilmen Tinker, Va}1on and the pipe is to he sltrppril Tram Ptta• pnitset•ty fur a luninr hlrh ::drool i o1• Ponca Treatment. Sat-anc voled for the motion• and fro; Utah; within n urek. xitr was rXee;Rsit'e. Mrs. ,Barry rn Was read from Jnmas Councilmen Ma4mvil and McGill- Other bidders, with but siil;hily pork that a tract of nkatut 11 d Woodway Park• pro- against. Councilmen Fnitels higher figures were the Pacific acres ens.L 'p[ the ,,!ghWay at . ainst allcgtd d:scourte- • �•�• Water Works. Supply compuyt•. Lynnwood Tni-,ht b0 ar:ulahlc. Lt. tent by F.dmortds police Z'ld aliggancr were absent. - Yi13 ad parked In a lxls wee. To connect with the new pump.. the American Cast Irop.Pipe coat- find bt.en.priced at $7 500, she -aA In was :•L In a ie zone. 8-inch- pipe lines- were authorized fatnY and the Purcell Company, Superintendonl Gle"Fi G. hill 7r- r to the Safety . to refer on Caspers street from Seventh- to fi O. Fowler and Company n,pda ported on the S,Pokane MMWM of to th Safetycoind Tmmittee Ninth -: and -on -Seventh_ta-.Glen..a.bid-on.:Centurv. asbestos -cement. educatars-whith-1le"�ttended,_STe___�_�:.._- --- .. itions eommit[te.,of the with. branching 6-inch lines, to pro- pipe.: Said that the su,+ply of feet+chefs ls- - - - tide severed Connections. to the _ e imglpvitre, tlthw3�y. rimar 3s stilt_ [ d[sti ilitition system. Ci1tS11'Ch C Mt8 Will Be a scarcity in .flea primsry. 5c}d _ :roiv told •af about 225 [> n, _ _ --• •He-said•thy_( Qnvt nisstlnn-•.ti•ark.na- s'ln.the dlsirlct•-at-the •-Upon_ motion. by.. Councilman n -...._- . _ .. Terrace, project near Maxwell, a 30-day extension was �t4ftt�Rf 1 '� rt�173 propecretl 1cri:;tntiun, including the: linger. and action w+u asked on the option tea buY the fckste :acitShp hand iliac and in- u- the chamber to extend 4LYacre watershed owned, by fhe i3on0rilag the altstandin_ pio- Cl•Casinl• she :•rchont district pond- r to:those, new ,residents AL-' l: Yost estate.-::.--•:: .Church. thir -and that e hurch has moved nas FirstI'It AdOu;�sto:tcpZrotlpsSunre bricking a, Castrleilman Tucker had "ado a mumorl+tlixe the untlelttg crrorts tier nra ts. . from the ^t_officse in- motion. that the tract be punch- �'"' - - ivlecd the chantltcr that ascd, with a [town payment a[ of JArrFes Flowttrd and A1icr 7:- ?lie tloc.rtS at tlalrixed a !.literal nt .post office lease at SIOW bring paid from park funds, Solt, item, in tlFe now church, by coat r ttlskttinn to HTzx. i?cnrl 1,. for not expice until but Ills motion received no second. the pvrcliase of a raodcrn electric �+Ialn� > 3I �' �L�' t tar '• but that he mould visit a argon as a memorial. lyft; Te:ftr reported that the in. the near future.. It The -purchase price is •o h: .red ta•;Ihe.aprsisi past R@ ahs WiR Ilniti®te raised by popular suWocr'lption stair, dcT tssscrt of lotto and in- rred t e, Item the members and frter[ds of dustrim,, d pad a total a: :rtt tt C. Colvin named Next 1Paedtn2s�T �vefatrlr�-, the church. $20%Z1 art the cl::im of i6ts. 11at- .ald as"}oeal chairmars for . Minds for the organ will ix :c- ma17i ht'oming Savings S3ood Crystal-itebekah Lodge No. 65 coved by the followinb members. T� r-miijitll- report ah3.4!; a will hold an initlataon of new total etrretit tbu a 73:�1;1, &1, a,g �. of the committee. file ,cornet . hlssiget, with «' [5.- Swanson of the jtIayReht members. at the nett -meeting• Rev. Norman Brown. chairman, WednesdaY evening• , April 26.. A 'phone =. Mm John W11er,.1�11 diture rfrrr' the g n cover r.Fmen- o recommended as rtded that . the soclal,hour still be held following Mfrs. Itrty Shawley; 172&- I+Sta. di[ures far tttr : rrmaltvicr of tl,a oard:be Asked ttr submit school Se'R`• - - . ------- - - oten..a-_proposal-for-the 'Son Noble Grand has extended a 'Keith Hayes 2572, ;Sirs. W. A. ,r.•,. nent of: the high SC][apl B;tlTHE,1t3 CUB TO MEET fleld wcleome to all members to attend ifarmnn• 312; D1ra. C. D.. Chmer, Packet Pg. 300 The April 26 meeting will be the 1'f31; ,firs. Clark ^_rymes; Mrs Th ent-IL G:'Colvirt r;xpres cd ?•a a o,t Mothers Club.:•tit ....n ..,i,,, 1 . a:,ia.i 1a first meetinz: starting an attend- win. •.c.,m,c*. 1:`k3?. •�. n _ 6.1.f May 11, 2004 MEMO FROM: KIN TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Matt Hanby 114 2"a Avenue So., Ste. 102 Edmonds, WA 98020 Remodel and addition of 1949 First Baptist Church 404 Bell Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 The following observations of the above referenced remodel and addition have been made after reviewing the drawings available and as listed below: Title: First Baptist Church Sheet I Dated 9-14-49 Sheet 3 Undated Sheets 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, 13 9-1-49 Note: Sheets 2, 14, and 15 missing Above drawings as prepared by Lamping, Ayer and Lockman OBSERVATIONS: Existing structure (originally church.) at East end remained and was incorporated into remodel. 2. Most portions of the main foundation were existing and added to where needed as part of remodel. 3. North and South walls at first floor (Sanctuary level) were part of original structure and remained. Windows were replaced and new siding installed. Packet Pg. 301 Women's Stories, Women's Lives" — The Snohomish County Washington Women's Lega... Page 1 of 3 6.1.g The Women's Legacy Project of Snohomish County, Washington seeks to honor our foremothers by recording and sharing their personal histories, their ability to adapt to the forces of change and their constant vigilance as stewards of the diverse cultures of our society. www.snohomishwomenslegacy Ora WLP Story Number 33 ALICE U. KERR — MAYOR OF EDMONDS, 1925- 27 By Charles Le Warne In December 1924, Edmonds narrowly elected Alice U. Kerr as mayor, one of the first women to lead a Washington city. League of Snohomish County Heritage Organizations Washington State Kerr was born Alice U. Lewis on February 28, 1858, in Chicago and raised there. After marrying James Howard Kerr in 1879, and the births of three children, the family homesteaded on the prairies of central Nebraska. The hardships of life in a "dugout" home and then a sod house, she believed, helped shape character. Such women worked alongside the men. The several neighbors, however scattered, enjoyed social gatherings, religious observances, and music. She taught school to her own and neighboring children and in time the family built a frame house. But town life beckoned, and the Kerrs moved in the early 1890s to nearby Ansley. He ran a mercantile business and both engaged in Ansley's civic and social life. Then, in 1919, the family moved halfway across the continent to Edmonds. With about 1000 residents, the Puget Sound mill town offered a dramatically different environment than the Nebraska prairies. The couple joined the First Baptist Church and Alice was elected assistant clerk. She became active in local and statewide Baptist circles and was president of the Edmonds Coterie Club, a women's group that promoted cultural and social activities. Many women who sought political office during that time had their grounding in such organizations, but Kerr chafed at being called a clubwoman. She entered the race for mayor late in 1924 at the behest of citizens decrying lax public behavior and poor law enforcement. "There has been too much booze, too many pool hall disturbances and too slack an administration of the law here for the public good, " Kerr told one audience. With Mayor Matt C. Engels unopposed for reelection, she entered only two days before the final vote and did http://snohomishwomenslegacy.org/wlp_33Kerr.html Attachmj Packet Pg. 302 2/5/2016 Women's Stories, Women's Lives" — The Snohomish County Washington Women's Lega... Page 2 of 3 6.1.g AT THF; ~41i.i rrAT10\ OF AN F:ARNE:�r L;ROt-P OF RFf`RE_SENT1%Tr F (W EDMONDN WNH1i{; A CHANGE OF I"1TY .1111111k rFUTZON, Mrs. Alice Kerr IP.ts 17)\til�1TED fu RUN FOR HAVIR AT THE moos-sY: r,.iYXTlfiti.DPXE3111RR 2. 19'_1. Committee of Citizens and Taxpayers not conduct a formal campaign. Single -page fliers announced that "Mrs. Alice Kerr" was running at the request of "an earnest group of representative citizens of Edmonds wishing a change of city administration." A "sticker" candidate, she asked voters to write her name on the ballot. On the first count a single vote defined her victory over Mayor Engels who gained two recounts before the City Council awarded Kerr the victory by 163 to 159. Despite stated concerns about lax law enforcement, Kerr early on assured residents that rumors about radical changes were unfounded. At the next council meeting, "the city hall [was] filled with people, breathlessly listening to every part of the proceedings" as Alice Kerr was formally introduced by Mayor Engels and sworn into office. After Engels noted his accomplishments, his successor pledged to carry out official duties to the best of her abilities, acknowledging two sides to every question. She received a box of flowers from citizens, and the process of governing the city got underway, much of the work mundane. Edmonds in the middle 1920s was a fast growing town socially and economically: "a live, busy industrious little city of which they may well be proud." Thus, most of Kerr's concerns during two years as mayor were those of a growing town that needed to develop infrastructure and meet such needs as street expansion and paving, lighting, and parking ordinances. Waterfront improvements were made and a new ferry landing built. A new fire truck was purchased, and there were city beautification projects. Most encountered little opposition. Then, the arrest of a pool room owner who had allowed a young boy to buy candy in the confectionary area of his business prompted controversy. City regulations did not allow minors in such establishments, but the owner denied he had to comply Council members proposed to repeal the ordinances that governed the control and licensing of pool rooms. In a "heated discussion" supporters argued that pool rooms were the only businesses paying city license fees that did not allow minors to enter their front rooms to purchase candy or ice cream, or to get haircuts. Nor was there evidence that pool halls contributed to crime. One council member suggested that the city should own and operate such establishments. The discussion extended to whether women should be allowed in pool rooms. The ordinance to repeal passed by a five to two vote, but Mayor Kerr's opposition prompted applause from the audience. A week later, Mayor Kerr issued a formal veto message outlining why she considered it "unwise to do away with all restrictions governing these places." Her veto, the first to occur in seven years, prevented the law from going into effect unless the council overrode it. She cited a United States Supreme Court ruling that pool rooms and card rooms required restrictions and argued that removing such restrictions would deny home rule. Furthermore, "a wide open, unrestricted, law defying policy would be unjust to our minors, disloyal on the part of the Mayor, and unfair to the law-abiding citizens of Edmonds." Her closing statements reflected her moral standards: "To serve as a city official, required sacrifice, subjects one to public criticism, but does not demand a surrender of moral convictions, or principle." She argued that "no self-respecting Mayor will fail to exercise the high privilige [sic] and duty of safe -guarding to the best of his ability, the youth of her city, the rights of law- abiding citizens and expressing a wholesome regard for the laws of the State of Washington." Thus, she refused to sign the ordinance. The council overruled the veto by the same five to two margin though supporters claimed they might prepare a more satisfactory alternative. One member suggested other institutions posed a "greater menace to our young people than pool rooms." http://snohomishwomenslegacy.org/wlp_33Kerr.html Packet Pg. 303 2/5/2016 Women's Stories, Women's Lives" — The Snohomish County Washington Women's Lega... Page 3 of 3 6.1.g Kerr's moralistic stance was reflected when she proclaimed a nightly nine o'clock curfew for children. But she did not entirely blame the youth for unruliness. To a Baptist women's conference she delivered a flaming address condemning "high-powered cars, guaranteed to make from sixty-five to ninety miles an hour" along with bootleggers and booze distillers who "give the youth their hell's brew.... Let's put the blame where it belongs, and confess that the example set by the grown-ups makes the honest parent pity the rising generation." Mayor Kerr led an Edmonds delegation to visit Seattle officials. They conferred with Mayor Edwin J. Brown, a onetime Edmonds resident who that day announced he would run for the U. S. Senate. The party's luncheon hostess was city council president Bertha Knight Landes, soon to be elected mayor of Seattle, the first woman to head a large American city. Mayor Kerr later addressed the council offering thanks and a welcome to Edmonds, "the sleeping porch of Seattle." Kerr's official functions were carried out with little regard for her gender, although newspapers often referred to her as Mrs. J. H. Kerr or Mrs. Kerr, even though official documents used the name of Alice U. Kerr. In March of 1925, ladies of the Baptist Church threw her a surprise birthday party with a decorated cake and an afternoon of quilting; a similar event would not likely have been reported had the mayor been male. When she left office, the Edmonds Coterie presented her with "a beautiful mirror," on behalf of the ladies of Edmonds. Mayor Kerr declined to run for re-election, but she remained active in civic and church affairs, the Coterie, and the Edmonds Music and Arts Study Club. James H. Kerr, died on December 15, 1931. A decade later their 26-year-old grandson became the Edmonds's first casualty of World War II. A naval officer, he was killed during early Japanese attacks on the Philippines. Alice Kerr was 91 years old when she died early on Wednesday, August 10, 1949. Her three remaining children all lived in Edmonds, and she also left grandchildren, great grand children, and great great grandchildren. Services were held at the Edmonds Baptist Church, with her remains shipped to Ansley, Nebraska, to rest beside her husband. Not until half a century after Kerr's term as mayor did other women hold elective office in Edmonds. Several served on the council and two went on to the mayor's office: Laura Hall in 1992, succeeded four years later by Barb Fahey. Alice Kerr was not forgotten. Another successor, Mayor Gary Haakenson, took the lead in naming public rooms in the City Hall for notable predecessors; a second floor conference room honors Alice U. Kerr. SELECTED SOURCES Edmonds City Council Minutes, 1924-27, microfiche in Edmonds City Hall. The Edmonds -Triune Review, 1924-27. Marie Botnen, "Early Edmonds ... City Has Woman Mayor," Edmonds Tribune- Review, February 12, 1969. "Mrs. Alice U. Kerr Former Mayor, Passes," Edmonds Tribune -Review, August 11, 1949, p. 1. A. U. K., "What It Costs to Develop a New Country: A Pioneer Experience," Lincoln [Nebraska] State Journal, January 2, 1927. Also typescript in Edmonds Museum. The article is written in the third - person but is clearly autobiographical. Mrs. J. H. Kerr, "What It Costs to Develop a New Country, Article #2," typescript in Edmonds Museum. "James H. Kerr Passes Away," Edmonds Tribune -Review, December 18, 1931, p. 1. © 2007 Charles LeWarne All Rights Reserved http://snohomishwomenslegacy.org/wlp_33Kerr.html Packet Pg. 304 2/5/2016 Letter to the Edmonds HPC regarding North Sound Church At the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission's January 14, 2016 meeting an application to add the North Sound Church to the Edmonds Register of Historic Places was reportedly approved by a vote of 5- 1, the one opposition vote having been cast by the Commission's lone professional member, Steve Waite, a practicing historical architect. His dissention was intended to encourage the Commission to follow an assessment process to address the required criteria that would justify nomination; that discussion did not occur. It is worth noting that following that process is essential because it has potential financial and legal implications. Mr. Waite's vote corresponded to the professional assessment of the BOLA Architecture + Planning report of 2005 in which BOLA said the North Sound Church did not meet the criteria for inclusion for the National Register of Historic Places, the very same criteria and guidelines in use today for recognition at all levels of government, including the City of Edmonds. (Edmonds is a designated Certified Local Government (CLG) and must meet federal and state standards. ECDC 20.45.000G). The BOLA report did say that the building could potentially contribute to a historic district; however, a contributing property requires far less significance and integrity than does a property being listed on the register. At my final meeting as a member of the Edmonds HPC in December 2015 I, too, stated that the building, albeit over 50 years old, did not meet these very same criteria. Finally, the Edmonds HPC on 2004 declined to nominate the building on the basis of it exterior, rather they attempted to describe spaces within the building as being important links to the past, a concept that to this day finds little support from preservationists for National Register status. Let me urge you to put this decision/process on hold pending a training session with Michael Houser, architectural historian with the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia. I have spoken with Michael, and he has agreed to come to Edmonds at a time of your choosing to conduct a session not unlike the one he previously did for the HPC when we were considering the Bassett House at 729 Main Street. I remember all attendees saying how beneficial Michael's presentation was and helpful in finally making the decision to reject the application on the basis of a lack of integrity. January 30, 2016 Gerald W. Tays /s/ Attachml Packet Pg. 305 6.1.i CITY OF EDMONDS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SUMMARY MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING December 10, 2015 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR, COMMISSIONER LIVINGSTON MOVED THAT THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION MEETING BE CALLED TO ORDER AT 5:30 P.M. IN THE 3" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM OF CITY HALL, 121 — 5TH AVENUE NORTH. COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Emily Scott, Chair (arrived at 5:45 p.m.) Larry Vogel, Vice Chair (arrived at 5:35 p.m.) Sandra Allbery Chris Definer -Karr Eric Livingston Tim Raetzloff Gerry Tays Dave Teitzel Steve Waite Kristiana Johnson, City Council Member (arrived at 5:45 p.m.) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Manager Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant COMMISSIONERS ABSENT Lora Petso, City Council Member (excused) COMMISSIONER LIVINGSTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 2015 AS AMENDED. COMMISSIONER TEITZEL SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Vice Chair Vogel arrived at 5:35 and assumed chairmanship of the meeting. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES/AUDIENCE COMMENTS The discussion relative to the North Sound Church's nomination was moved to be next on the agenda, and a discussion about the FTP Site was also added to the end of the agenda. The discussion relative to the Strategic Plan Timeline was combined with Committee Updates. The remainder of the agenda was approved as presented. DISCUSSION ON NOMINATION FOR NORTH SOUND CHURCH Mr. Lien announced that the City received an updated nomination for the North Sound Church, but it was not submitted in time to notice a public hearing at the December meeting. In preparation for moving the nomination forward, he reminded the Commission of the criteria for adding properties to the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. He said he is particularly concerned about whether or not the structure meets the criteria associated with "integrity." He provided current photographs, as well as photographs from 1948, 1949, and 1953 and explained the changes that have occurred to the structure over time. Packet Pg. 306 6.1.i Mr. Lien explained that in order to determine the structure's integrity, the Commission must first identify its significant features. To help the Commission make this determination, he referred to the Department of the Interior's seven aspects for determining integrity (location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association) and a 2004 brief that was prepared by the National Park Service after evaluating the building to identify its significant features. He noted that the building was moved to its current location in 1929, and most of the materials on the exterior have not been preserved. Given this and other information available to the Commission, he said he has serious questions as to whether or not the building would meet the "integrity" criteria. Chair Scott arrived at the meeting at 5:45 p.m. and assumed chairmanship of the meeting. Each of the Commissioners were invited to share their thoughts on what would be considered the significant historic features of the structure, and whether or not the structure, in its current condition, would meet the criteria for "integrity." The Commissioners all agreed they wanted to investigate the structure further for potential inclusion on the Register. It was suggested that perhaps the period of significance should be measured from 1953 when the extensive remodel was done and the steeple was added. It was further agreed that the building is located in the heart of downtown Edmonds, and is very important to the City's history, but more research is needed to determine its integrity. They agreed to contemplate the nomination further and continue their discussion at the January 14ffi meeting. THANK YOU FOR SERVICE ON COMMISSION The Commissioners voiced appreciation to outgoing Commissioners Tays and Teitzel, as well as Council Member Petso, for their service and contribution on the Commission. Commissioner Teitzel commented that, as a new City Council Member, he is hoping to assume Council Member Petso's role as a non -voting member of the Commission going forward. Chair Scott also recognized Commissioner Allbery for perfect attendance at all of the Commission's 2015 meetings. HOLIDAY CARDS Chair Scott provided holiday cards to send to owners of property on the Register, as well as owners of potential properties. She asked each of the Commissioners to sign the cards before they are sent out. COMMITTEE UPDATES Commissioner Waite reminded the Commission of their mission to encourage owners of historic properties to put them on the Register. He said the Preservation Planning Committee is recommending that the Commission abandon the committees for a time so that all Commissioners can focus on getting properties on the Register. Each month, they could present properties and discuss how the owners would be contacted. Paramount to the concept is to establish in -person contact rather than just written communication. In addition, the committee suggests that the Commission invite other people, such as the museum, to be involved in creating the 2016 calendar so that Commissioners can focus more of their efforts towards getting properties on the Register. The Commissioners all voiced support for this new approach starting in January, and they agreed that the Register effort should start with the nominations that are already on file. In addition to more aggressively pursuing properties for the Register and collaborating with other groups to create the 2016 calendar, Commissioner Deiner-Karr suggested that the Commission, along with other organizations, also consider sponsoring an event in May that would bring the community together and draw awareness to historic preservation. She agreed to provide more information to support the idea at the January meeting. Commissioner Teitzel reported that he would meet with Frances Chapin to discuss signage at Yost Park to identify an old - growth stump with springboard notches that represents an important part of the City's heritage. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS The Commissioners agreed to dissolve the current committees so that everyone could focus on getting properties on the Register. Tasks that were previously assigned to the three committees would be assigned to Commissioners as needed. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes December 10, 2015 Page 2 Packet Pg. 307 6.1.j Department. Commissioner Waite agreed to work with the committee and provide direction as to whether or not a Certificate of Appropriateness would be required for some of the projects on the list. Commissioner Allbery agreed to forward a list of the Museum's Maintenance Committee Members to Commissioner Waite. Discussion on Expired Applications and Assigned Duties Ms. Cunningham provided a list of properties for which applications have already been prepared, and Chair Scott recommended that Commissioners review the hard copy applications, update the information, and enter it into an on-line document that can be easily shared. Chair Scott also invited Commissioners to review the actual application form and identify potential changes. It was suggested that staff contact the City's IT Department to discuss the option of making the application form available on line. Commissioners Definer -Karr and Livingston agreed to review and update the hard copy applications and convert them into a shareable digital format. The second step will be to create a digital application form and transcribe the existing applications into word documents that can be altered and updated. They agreed to report their progress at the next meeting. Discussion on Interpretive Signne Along Sunset Avenue and at Yost Park Council Member Teitzel said the concept is to set up interpretive signage to celebrate the City's heritage as a logging and shingle town. Currently proposed is a sign at the south end of Sunset Avenue that would provide a historic picture of the mills that were located along the waterfront at the turn of the century, along with descriptive information. Another sign is proposed for Yost Park near a large, old -growth cedar stump that has springboard notches. He has met with representatives from the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department, who have indicated support. He has also worked with representatives from Historical Society to identify old pictures that would work for both locations. The current task is to prepare information for the text, and Vice Chair Vogel has agreed to write the text as soon as the information has been collected. Once a draft layout of the two signs has been prepared, he will work with City staff to discuss the next steps. Geo Caching Event in May to Raise Awareness of Historic Preservation Commissioner Deiner-Karr reported that she is meeting with a geo cache group in Seattle on January 18t' to talk about the concept, and then she will pull together a team to put out the caches. The idea is to include properties on the Register, as well as other historic sites in the City, in a historical hunt. Commissioner Deiner-Karr agreed to prepare a plan and cost estimates and then report to the Commission at their next meeting. Guide Brochure Ms. Cunningham reported that Mr. Chave updated the Guide Brochure, and it has been reproduced. Copies were provided to each of the Commissioners. It was noted that there is only one box (160) of the 2016 calendars left. Commissioner Deiner- Karr agreed to distribute a large portion of the remaining calendars. North Sound Church Nomination for Register Mr. Chave expressed his belief that the North Sound Church application appears to meet the minimum criteria for listing the property on the Register based on its condition 50 years ago. While it is not a stellar example of architecture, it has local significance. COMMISSIONER RAETZLOFF MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION NOMINATE THE NORTH SOUND CHURCH FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES BASED ON PAST DISCUSSIONS AND FURTHER REVIEW OF THE MATERIALS PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED 6-1, WITH COMMISSIONER WAITE VOTING IN OPPOSITION. Commissioner Waite pointed out that the BOLA Report did not find the property to be worthy of inclusion on the Register. However, the report did indicate that it could be a contributing element of a historic district. He recalled Mr. Lien's previous presentation regarding the significance and integrity of the structure. While the property could meet some of the criteria, other criteria could not be met. While he would not be offended by including the property on the Register, he reminded the Commission that they use the Department of the Interior's Criteria as a guide. Mr. Chave pointed out that in order to comply with the national guidelines, the Commission would have to conclude that the structure's significance stemmed from its Historic Preservation Commission Minutes January 14, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 308 6.1.j existence in the 1950s. Commissioner Raetzloff acknowledged that the building was moved from its original location and was substantially remodeled in about 1953. However, he argued that the 1950s was the structure's greatest period of historical significance, in that the church was a very vital organization at that time. There have only been small changes since 1953, with the exception of the bell tower, and the building has stayed substantially the same for more than 60 years. The nomination was scheduled for a public hearing before the Commission on February l lth NEW BUSINESS No new business was scheduled on the agenda. ACTION ITEMS Election of 2016 Officers THE COMMISSIONERS VOTED UNANIMOUSLY IN FAVOR OF THE NOMINATIONS MADE AT THE DECEMBER 10, 2015 MEETING THAT COMMISSIONER SCOTT SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE COMMISSION AND COMMISSIONER VOGEL SERVE AS VICE CHAIR OF THE COMMISSION IN 2016. Vice Chair Vogel said one of his goals for 2016 is to work more closely and forge a better bond with the Historical Society. He would also like more properties to be added to the Register and for the Commission to pursue the concept of creating a historic district in downtown Edmonds. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS Again, Chair Scott stressed the importance of updating the existing applications and creating digital files. Once this has been done, the intent is to divide the properties amongst the Commissioners to further pursue. The goal is to have the updates completed by the Commission's next meeting on February 1 lr''. Chair Scott reminded the Commissioners to check their City email accounts on a regular basis for communications from her and staff. Mr. Chave announced that Commissioners now have a log -in and password that accesses a very specific part of the City's FTE site. It can be used to upload, download and exchange City files. Instructions will be sent to their official City email account. Chair Scott said she is looking forward to 2016. She has been working closely with Vice Chair Vogel and Mayor Earling, and she hopes to work more closely with the City Council on historic preservation, as well. She will also work on the 2017 calendar, using a "midcentury" theme. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Deiner-Karr suggested the Commission review the work -flow process for applications to help the Commission get to a conclusion much faster. For example, the Commission should consider early in the application process whether or not a property is viable for the Register and meets the criteria. Commissioner Waite commented that this would require the Commissioners to gain a better understanding of the Department of the Interior's criteria. Chair Scott agreed to consider options for additional training in this regard. Council Member Teitzel announced that he has been assigned to serve as the City Council's liaison to the Historic Preservation Commission, and he is pleased to have the opportunity to work with them in 2016. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:47 p.m. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes January 14, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 309 6.1.k CITY OF EDMONDS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SUMMARY MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING February 11, 2016 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Scott called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:30 p.m. in the 3rd Floor Conference Room of City Hall, 121 — 5d' Avenue North. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Emily Scott, Chair Larry Vogel, Vice Chair (arrived at 5:35 p.m.) Sandra Allbery Chris Definer -Karr Eric Livingston Tim Raetzloff Steve Waite Dave Teitzel, City Council Member READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant OTHERS PRESENT Kristiana Johnson, City Council President Gerry Tays COMMISSIONER LIVINGSTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 14, 2016 AS SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER ALLBERY SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES Discussions relative to form updates and the band shell at the Frances Anderson Center were added to the agenda. The discussion relative to a geocaching plan was postponed to the next meeting. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE There were no audience comments. PUBLIC HEARING: To determine the eligibility of the First Baptist Church of Edmonds, located at 404 Bell Street, for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places (File Number PLN20150061) Mr. Lien reviewed the application for designation of the church located at 404 Bell Street for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. He advised that the church's original name was the First Baptist Church of Edmonds, but the name was changed in the 1990s to the North Sound Church. The Commission agreed that the official name, if designated for the Register, would be the First Baptist Church of Edmonds. Mr. Lien noted that the owners have signed the appropriate forms, giving authorization for the property to be listed on the Register. Packet Pg. 310 6.1.k He briefly reviewed the benefits and requirements associated with listing a property on the Register. He provided a description of the subject property and nearby historic properties and reviewed the three criteria the building must meet in order to be listed on the Register: 1. The structure must be significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or cultural heritage of Edmonds. Mr. Lien said the building, itself, does not have any strong architecture, archaeology or engineering features that can be significantly associated with Edmonds. However, the church has served the Edmonds community for more than 107 years. The criteria could be met if the Commission finds the church is significantly associated with the history and cultural heritage of Edmonds. 2. The structure must have integrity. Mr. Lien noted that the building has undergone many changes since its original construction in 1909, but the exterior is largely unchanged since the 1950 remodel. The only minor change is the opening of the bell tower. If the period of significance is determined to be the 1950 remodel, the building may be considered to meet the integrity criteria. 3. The structure must be at least 50 years old. Mr. Lien noted that the original church structure was constructed in 1909 with a major remodel in 1950. Both the original construction and the 1950 remodel are more than 50 years old. Mr. Lien explained that in addition to the above criteria, the property must meet at least one of the eleven designation categories listed in Edmonds Community Development Code 20.45.010 (A through K). He reviewed that the subject property would be consistent with the following categories: d. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history. Mr. Lien explained that the church has been used for many weddings, baptisms, funerals and community events, and the congregation has supported residents of the City for more than 100 years. e. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history. Mr. Lien noted that Alice Kerr, the first female mayor of Edmonds (elected in 1924), was a member of the congregation, and records show that she played a significant role in church activities. However, this fact may not meet the criteria if the period of significance does not start until the 1950 remodel. g. Is a building or structure removed from its location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. Mr. Lien explained that the church was moved from its original location at 6th Avenue North and Edmonds Street. However, the structure does have some architectural features that could be considered significant, including the windows on the front and the bell tower. Mr. Lien reviewed that he has some reservations about recommending the structure for the Register, primarily because he is not confident it meets all three of the required criteria. Specifically, the Commission must determine if the church is significantly associated with the history or cultural heritage of Edmonds and whether it has integrity. If the Commission finds that it does meet all three criteria, they should identify the structure's period of significance and define its significant features. The Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for a public hearing and final decision. Mr. Lien advised that a public comment was received from Gerald Tays, expressing his belief that the church building does not meet the criteria for listing it on the Register. He suggested the Commission not make a recommendation on the church until they have had a training session with Michael Hauser, architectural historian with the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. No one in the audience indicated a desire to participate, and the public hearing was closed. In reference to the three design criteria, the Commissioners primarily agreed that the structure is at least 50 years; and given that the period of significance is the 1950 remodel, it also has integrity. However, there was some disagreement about the structure's association with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or cultural heritage of Edmonds. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 11, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 311 6.1.k Based on the immense amount of research done on the building, Chair Scott said she is passionate about its integral part of Edmonds. While the building is a living organism and modifications have occurred, the changes are far enough away to maintain its integrity and usage. It's an important building and an important aspect of the community. Buildings of this type are becoming fewer, and listing this visible and active community building would promote the Commission's mission of historic preservation in the area. Although the building would not be acceptable for the National Register, she believes it is acceptable for the local Register. Mr. Lien noted that, according to the BOLA Report, only 4 of the 18 properties on the Register would meet the criteria for the National Register. Commissioner Waite emphasized the need to review applications based on the designation criteria and categories. In the Commission's motion, it is important to document why a property is or is not recommended for the Register. Council Member Teitzel noted that the building has been unchanged for 65 years. It is also the oldest continuously operating church building in Edmonds and is important to the City's cultural history. Commissioner Raetzloff pointed out that he knows of no other church buildings from the early 1900's era that still exist in Edmonds. He also pointed out that the community of faith is a significant part of the City's background and has played a part in tying together the cultural fabric of the community. It is likely the 1950 remodel occurred during a time of great activity for the church, as they felt confident enough to do significant reconstruction and expansion. From the church's point of view, their significant period coincides with the 1950 remodel, and the church has remained nearly unchanged since that time. Vice Chair Vogel shared information he knew about Alice Kerr, who was very active in the church. She was elected mayor of Edmonds during a time of reform, and she was chosen by the faith community to lead the effort. However, her period of time was prior to the period they are talking about for the building's significance. He noted that the guidelines are silent on whether a building's significance to cultural heritage must have occurred during the same time period associated with its integrity. He suggested perhaps there could be another classification to recognize structures in the City that do not meet the stricter criteria for the Register but are, nonetheless, part of the City's cultural heritage and worthy of some level of preservation. Absence of this other form of recognition, he supports interpreting the criteria in such a way that would allow the building to be listed on the Register. Council Member Teitzel expressed his belief that listing the property on the Register would be good for Edmonds because it is a highly -visible building that has been in its current location for 65 years. It is on the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor, where there is a lot of foot traffic, and listing it on the Register offers a chance to celebrate a substantial part of the City's history. It also establishes a relationship that will allow the Commission to consult with the owners in an effort to maintain the historic characteristics of the church. If it is not listed, the opportunity will be lost. He felt an argument could be made that the building meets the required criteria. Commissioner Allbery also voiced concern about losing the building as part of the City's historic culture. She would support a recommendation to add the building to the Register if there is no other way to preserve the structure as part of a future historic district. Commissioner Livingston voiced support for recommending the building for the Register. He recalled a 1954 Supreme Court opinion that indicated that cities should be able to determine their own look, feel and security systems, and he felt this opinion could be applied to the subject property. He said he would be willing to bend some of the rules to get the property on the Register. Commissioner Deiner-Karr said she also supports a recommendation to add the property to the Register. However, she voiced overall concern about how the criteria is interpreted. She suggested that, in the future, the Commission should conduct a more thorough research before pursuing properties to confirm whether or not they can meet the criteria for inclusion on the Register. The Commission discussed specific evidence that would allow the structure to adequately meet both Criteria 1 and Criteria 2. Mr. Lien suggested that perhaps the time period used to identify the church's association with the City's history and/or cultural heritage could be mutually exclusive of the time period used for determining integrity. For example, the church has Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 11, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 312 6.1.k served the community for more than 100 years, including a significant person in Edmonds' history. Also, the building has maintained its integrity since 1950 and is at least 50 years old. Commissioner Waite suggested they find other important people associated with the church's history. Council Member Teitzel said he is confident they can work with the church to collect more facts, but he was comfortable that the information provided to date supports the idea that the church is culturally significant from a faith perspective and an important part of the fabric of Edmonds. Chair Scott voiced her opinion that the building meets all of the basic criteria for inclusion on the Register, without bending or breaking the rules. Not only can its historic significance be tied to the people who attended church there, many civic - minded projects likely got their start in the building. Although the Commission would like to do research to find more specific history about the structure, the base requirements have been met by the information provided. Vice Chair Vogel recalled other properties on the Register that have changed significantly since they were originally constructed. Gerry Tays, Edmonds, agreed that the building is important, although not necessarily historic. He explained the difference between the National Register of Historic Places and the National Landmarks Program and advised that the question of whether or not there is another historic church in the City would be legitimate if talking about a landmark, but it has no relevance to the current conversation. It's an either or situation, either they save it or they don't. The historic district program was designed to give alternatives for significant historic buildings that do not meet the National Register standards. The standards for contributing buildings in historic districts are far lower. If a portion of 4`b Avenue were designated as a historic district, the church would be an appropriate, and perhaps even a lynch pin, of the district. Mr. Tays pointed out that the standards are the only ones set up by the Secretary of the Interior. Although the Commission can judge them differently, they must apply the same standards. He asked the Commission to consider his written comment, in which he mentioned that a representative from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation has offered to provide training to the Commission. They all have expressed some uneasiness about their ability to make a correct decision, and professional guidance would be appropriate. Commissioner Raetzloff summarized that the Commission has established that the criteria pertaining to the building's age and integrity have been met. With regard to Criteria 1, given the number of people who have participated in the church's congregation, it absolutely has a significant association with the cultural heritage of Edmonds, even since 1950. COMMISSIONER RAETZLOFF MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION FIND THAT THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF EDMONDS (FILE NUMBER PLN20150061) MEETS THE DESIGNATION CRITERIA. HE FURTHER MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE PROPERTY BE LISTED ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES. VICE CHAIR VOGEL SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED 6-1, WITH COMMISSIONER WAITE VOTING IN OPPOSITION. Commissioner Waite said he would prefer the Commission postpone its decision until after seeking additional guidance from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Mr. Lien advised that he would schedule a public hearing and present the Commission's recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Definer -Karr agreed to conduct additional research on the property. 1W*,&'An- IMMMIR Form Updates Commissioner Deiner-Karr suggested that changes to the application form should be postponed until the Commission has updated its work form process. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 11, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 313 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Civic Field Street Vacations Staff Lead/Author: Carrie Hite Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Initiated By: Recommendation: It is recommended that Council forward this to the consent agenda for adoption on April 12, 2016. Previous Council Action: Council authorized the purchase of Civic field. Council passed a resolution 1352 to begin the process of the street vacations on Civic Field, not including the alley, on March 15, 2016. Council adopted a motion on March 22, 2016 to direct the City Attorney to bring back a new resolution to begin the process of both the streets and alley vacation on Civic Field. Narrative: As the City proceeded with the purchase of Civic field, it became apparent that there was no official vacation of either Edmonds or Sprague streets or an alley that runs through the Civic Field property. This allowed us to negotiate a purchase price from the School District for 6.07 +/- acres, instead of the full 8 acre site. In order for the City to plan and develop this property as open space and parkland, it is recommended that the City Council consider the official vacation of these two streets and alley to itself as part of the park. Attached is a resolution that will officially begin the process of these vacations. The resolution calls for a public hearing on May 17, 2016. Attachments: 2016-03-29 resolution setting hearing for street vacation Resolution 1352 Final PSA Packet Pg. 314 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SETTING A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF TWO STREETS AND ONE ALLEY LOCATED WITHIN THE RECENTLY ACQUIRED CIVIC FIELD PROPERTY; REPEALING RESOLUTION 1352 THAT SET A HEARING DATE FOR THE VACATION OF THE TWO STREETS WITHOUT MENTIONING THE ALLEY. WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 authorizes the city council to initiate a street vacation process by passage of a resolution; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 requires the city council to fix a time by resolution for public hearing on any proposed street vacation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 requires that such hearing occur no less than twenty days and no more than sixty days after the passage of the resolution fixing the hearing date; and WHEREAS, in addition to state law, chapter 20.70 ECDC also sets forth street vacation procedures, some but not all of which are applicable to a street vacation initiated by the city council; and WHEREAS, the city council would like to initiate a street vacation process for two streets and one alley within the civic field property that are legally described as follows: Edmonds Street between Blocks 99 and 100, Sprague Street between Blocks 100 and 101, and the unnamed alley within Block 100, City of Edmonds, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 2 of Plats, pages 39 and 39A, records of Snohomish County, Washington; and WHEREAS, the resolution being repealed only mentioned the two streets within civic field, not the alley; and WHEREAS, the city council deems it preferable to have only one hearing on all the rights -of -way (streets and alley) to be vacated within civic field; and WHEREAS, this street/alley vacation is being proposed because the city intends to preserve most of the civic field property as a park in perpetuity, making it unlikely that these two streets and the alley will ever be developed for transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, the city has executed deed restrictions in favor of granting agencies which would be inconsistent with the improvement of these streets as streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington as follows: Section 1. A public hearing on the proposed street vacation shall be scheduled for May 17, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. before the Edmonds City Council. Packet Pg. 315 7.1.a Section 2. The city clerk shall provide notice of the public hearing as required pursuant to RCW 35.79.020 and ECDC 20.70.090 to the extent that such notice requirements are applicable. Section 3. Resolution 1352 is hereby repealed. RESOLVED this 12t' day of April, 2016. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, DAVE EARLING ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 316 7.1.b RESOLUTION NO. 1352 A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SETTING A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF STREETS LOCATED WITHIN THE RECENTLY ACQUIRED CIVIC FIELD PROPERTY WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 authorizes the city council to initiate a street vacation process by passage of a resolution; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 requires the city council to fix a time by resolution for public hearing on any proposed street vacation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.010 requires that such hearing occur no less than twenty days and no more than sixty days after the passage of the resolution fixing the hearing date; and WHEREAS, in addition to state law, chapter 20.70 ECDC also sets forth street vacation procedures, some but not all of which are applicable to a street vacation initiated by the city council; and WHEREAS, the city council would like to initiate a street vacation process for two streets within the civic field property that are legally described as follows: Edmonds Street between Blocks 99 and 100 and Sprague Street between Blocks 100 and 101, City of Edmonds, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 2 of Plats, pages 39 and 39A, records of Snohomish County, Washington; and WHEREAS, this street vacation is being proposed because the vacation would allow the portion of civic field that is unencumbered by grant covenants to be concentrated in one area in the western portion of the site along 61h Avenue, which will allow for more flexibility in the usage of that unencumbered area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington as follows: Section 1. A public hearing on the proposed street vacation shall be scheduled for April 19th, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. before the Edmonds City Council. Section 2. The city clerk shall provide notice of the public hearing as required pursuant to RCW 35.79.020 and ECDC 20.70.090. RESOLVED this 15th day of March, 2016. CITY OF EDMONDS M YOR, DAVE EARLING Packet Pg. 317 ATTEST: FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. March 11, 2016 March 15, 2016 1352 Packet Pg. 318 7.1.c PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT This PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation, ("Buyer"), and the Edmonds School District #15, a Washington municipal corporation ("Seller"), as of the date appearing in the last paragraph of this Agreement ("Effective Date"). Buyer and Seller may hereafter be known individually as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property and improvements located thereon in downtown Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, known as Civic Field and more particularly described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Property"). B. Buyer has been leasing the Property from Seller for over 35 years, pursuant to a Lease Agreement dated August 1, 1977, as amended by Addendum to Lease Agreement dated January 20, 1981 (as amended, the "Lease"). Buyer now desires to purchase the Property because of its conservation values, including, without limitation, public recreational use, and public open and green space. C. Seller desires to sell the Property (as defined herein) to Buyer, and Buyer E desires to purchase the Property from Seller on the terms and conditions set forth in this •2 Agreement. Buyer and Seller are entering into this Agreement pursuant to the authority granted in Chapter 39.33 Revised Code of Washington, (Intergovernmental Disposition of M Property Act) which permits a political subdivision of the State of Washington to sell real r property to the state or any municipality or any political subdivision thereof on such terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed upon by the proper authority of the state and/or Cn the subdivisions concerned. a c Intending to be legally bound, for good and valuable consideration, including the U- mutual covenants and promises of the Parties, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: E 1. PROPERTY. The "Property" subject to this Agreement consists of all of the following: a a. That certain real property consisting of approximately 6.07 acres, more or less, located at 310 6th Avenue N, Edmonds, Washington and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Land"). b. All rights, privileges and easements appurtenant to the Land, including without limitation all minerals, oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances on the Land, all development rights, air rights, water, water rights and stock water relating to the Land, and any and all easements, rights -of -way and other appurtenances used in Packet Pg. 319 7.1.c connection with the beneficial use and enjoyment of the Land (collectively, the "Appurtenances"). 2. PURCHASE. Seller shall sell and convey the Property to Buyer, and Buyer shall purchase the Property from Seller, on the terms, covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Buyer acknowledges that Buyer is in occupancy of the Property pursuant to the Lease and that prior to Closing (as defined below in Section 9.1); Buyer shall have performed any further inspections it desires with respect to the Property. Buyer will be purchasing the Property in its present physical condition, "As Is," except for the express covenants, representations and warranties and indemnities contained in this Agreement. As of the Effective Date, Buyer agrees that Seller has made no representations or warranties or agreements of any kind or nature regarding the Property, except for the express warranties contained in this Agreement. 3. PURCHASE PRICE. 3.1. Amount. The purchase price ("Purchase Price") for the Property shall be One Million Nine Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,900,000.00). 3.2. Payment. Buyer shall pay Seller the Purchase Price at Closing. 3.3 Earnest Money; Liquidated Damages. Within two (2) days after the ii Effective Date, Buyer shall deliver to Chicago Title Insurance Company, 3002 Colby Ave •2 #200, Everett, WA 98201 ("Escrow Holder"), an executed earnest money promissory note in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), in the form of Exhibit 3.3 (the "Earnest M Money Note"). Simultaneously with Buyer's delivery of an Approval Notice pursuant to r Section 6.4, the Earnest Money Note shall be converted to cash, and shall become non- refundable. The earnest money funds (the "Deposit") shall be applied to the Purchase Price Cn at Closing. The Deposit shall be nonrefundable to Buyer. IN THE EVENT BUYER FAILS, a WITHOUT LEGAL EXCUSE, TO COMPLETE THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY, THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE FORFEITED TO SELLER AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AS THE U_ SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY AVAILABLE TO SELLER. Buyer and Seller agree that the Deposit represents a reasonable sum considering all of the circumstances existing on E the date of this Agreement and represent a reasonable estimate of the losses that Seller will incur if Buyer fails without legal excuse to purchase the Property. a 4. TITLE. 4.1. Condition of Title. Title shall be insurable by a 2006 ALTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy in the amount of the Purchase Price (the "Title Policy"), subject only to the Permitted Exceptions (as defined below in section 4.3). Seller shall satisfy all requirements of the Title Company in connection with issuance of the title policy in accordance with the Commitment. 4.2. Title Insurance Commitment. Buyer has obtained a current title insurance commitment issued by First American Title Insurance Company (the "Title 2 Packet Pg. 320 7.1.c Company"), under commitment number 4229-2358636 (Second Report), dated August 20, 2015 ("Commitment"), showing title to the Property vested in Seller and committing to insure such title in Buyer by the issuance of a 2006 ALTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of title insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price. Buyer shall be solely responsible for the cost of any policy endorsements ("Endorsements") as required by Buyer. 4.3. Review of Title. Buyer shall have until twenty (20) days before the end of the Due Diligence Period (as defined in section 6.4) to notify Seller in writing of any objection Buyer, in its sole discretion, may have to any exceptions shown on the Commitment. Seller will promptly notify Buyer within seven (7) business days after receipt of Buyer's written objection if Seller agrees to remove exceptions Buyer objected to (which removal will be accomplished on or prior to Closing, as defined in Section 9.1 below), and if Seller does not agree to remove such exceptions Buyer shall then have three (3) business days to either waive the objection in writing or agree to take title subject to such exceptions N (and Buyer's failure to notify Seller of such decision shall be deemed to be Buyer's election o to take title subject to such exceptions). Those exceptions disclosed in the Commitment that Buyer does not disapprove, those exceptions Buyer elects (or is deemed to have o elected) to take title subject to, and those matters created by Buyer (as tenant under the Lease) constitute permitted exceptions ("Permitted Exceptions"). Seller and Buyer shall cooperate to remove special exception number 9 from the Commitment at Closing (as the in lease referred to in special exception number 9 will be terminated by merger upon Buyer's :2 acquisition of the Property). Seller shall immediately notify Buyer of any liens, leases, ii encumbrances, easements, restrictions, conditions, covenants, rights -of -way and other 2 matters affecting title to the Property that are created by Seller and which may appear of v record or be revealed by survey or otherwise after the date of the Commitment but before the Closing (collectively, "Intervening Exceptions"). Intervening Exceptions shall be subject r to Buyer's approval and Buyer shall have ten (10) business days after notice in writing of any Intervening Exception, together with a description thereof and a copy of the instrument < creating or evidencing the Intervening Exception, if any, to either accept it (whereupon the a Intervening Exception shall become a Permitted Exception) or submit written objection. Seller will promptly notify Buyer within ten (10) business days after receipt of Buyer's written U- objection if Seller agrees to remove Intervening Exceptions that do not become Permitted Exceptions prior to Closing, and if Seller does not agree to remove such Intervening Exceptions Buyer shall then have ten (10) business days to either waive the objection in writing or agree to take title subject to such Intervening Exceptions. a 5. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT. 5.1. Conditions to Purchase. Buyer's obligations with respect to purchase of the Property and the Closing are subject to fulfillment of the conditions precedent ("Buyer's Conditions Precedent") described below, or waiver thereof by Buyer, not later than the earlier of the date set forth below or the Closing Date (defined in Section 9.1 below). a. Title Policy. All requirements set forth in the Commitment (including any update) shall have been satisfied or waived by the Title Company and the Packet Pg. 321 7.1.c Title Company shall be prepared at the Closing Date to issue the Title Policy as described in Section 4. b. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of Seller. Seller shall have performed each and every obligation to be performed by Seller under this Agreement, and Seller's representations and warranties in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the Closing. C. No Adverse Changes. As of the Closing, there shall have been no material adverse change in the physical condition of the Property from the date of this Agreement. d. Seller's Deliveries. Seller shall have delivered each of the items described in Section 6.1 to Buyer and in Section 8.1 to Escrow Holder. e. Investigation. Buyer shall have delivered an Approval Notice to Seller by the end of the Due Diligence Period to confirm that the condition stated in Section 6.4 has been satisfied or waived within the time period required therein. f. No Seller Bankruptcy. If at any time prior to Closing, (i) there :2 shall be filed against or by Seller a petition in bankruptcy or insolvency or a petition seeking ii to effect any plan or other arrangement with creditors or seeking the appointment of a 2 receiver and the same is not discharged or dismissed before Closing; (ii) a receiver or v liquidator is appointed for all or substantially all of Seller's property; (iii) Seller makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors or takes any other similar action for the benefit or r protection of creditors, then Buyer shall have the right in its sole and absolute discretion and in addition to all other remedies available to Buyer pursuant to this Agreement or at law or in < equity to cancel and terminate this Agreement after which the Deposit shall be returned to a Buyer and neither Party shall have any further rights or obligations under this Agreement. ii 5.2. Benefit of Buyer. The Buyer's Conditions Precedent are solely for the benefit of Buyer and may be waived only in writing by Buyer. Buyer shall at all times have the right to waive any condition. The waiver by Buyer of any condition in any specific circumstances shall not be a waiver of such condition with respect to any other circumstances or a waiver of any other condition and shall not relieve Seller of any liability or a obligation with respect to any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement of Seller, unless the waiver expressly so provides. 5.3. Termination. If any Buyer's Condition Precedent is not timely fulfilled and is not waived by Buyer, Buyer may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller and Escrow Holder shall, if Buyer so instructs, return to the Parties all funds and documents deposited by them, respectively, with the Escrow Holder. 6. INVESTIGATION OF THE PROPERTY. 0 Packet Pg. 322 7.1.c 6.1. Seller's Initial Deliveries. Within ten (10) business days from the Effective Date, Seller shall, at its sole expense, deliver to Buyer copies of disclosure materials pertaining to the condition and/or operation of the Property to the extent currently in possession of Seller. Buyer waives the right to receive a seller disclosure statement if required by RCW 64.06 (the "Form 17," with RCW 64.06 referred to as the "Seller Disclosure Statute"); provided, however, that if the answer to any of the questions in the section of the Form 17 entitled "Environmental" would be "yes," then Buyer does not waive the receipt of the "Environmental" section of the Form 17. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that (i) neither the Form 17 nor any information or statements set forth therein comprise part of this Agreement, (ii) pursuant to RCW 64.06.070, neither the Seller Disclosure Statute nor the Form 17 gives Buyer any additional rights or remedies except for the right of rescission exercised on the basis and within the time limits provided by the Seller Disclosure Statute, and (iii) all statements and information provided by Seller on the Form 17, if any, are made to the actual knowledge of Seller. 6.2. Entry. Without limiting any other rights of Buyer under this Agreement, as of the Effective Date, Buyer and Buyer's agents and employees shall have the right to conduct soils, engineering, environmental and other tests at the Property at Buyer's sole expense. Seller agrees, at Buyer's cost, to cooperate with any such investigations, inspections, or studies made by or at Buyer's direction. The exercise by in Buyer of any of the preceding rights or any other act of Buyer shall not negate any representation, warranty or covenant of Seller, or modify any of Buyer's rights or Seller's ii obligations in the event of any breach by Seller of any of its representations, warranties or 2 covenants under this Agreement. Buyer shall indemnify and hold Seller harmless from any and all damages, liabilities, expense, liens or claims (including but not limited to attorneys' fees) arising from the activities or negligence of Buyer or its employees or agents in the r exercise of its testing rights hereunder or failure to pay third parties for testing work as described herein; and the provisions of this indemnity shall survive termination of this �¢ Agreement. a c 6.3. Environmental Assessment. Buyer may obtain such environmental assessments of the Property as Buyer deems appropriate; provided, however, that before conducting any invasive drilling or sampling of the Property, Buyer shall first obtain Seller's written consent as to the work plan, scope and locations of such work, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. a 6.4. Period for Investigation. Closing of this transaction is conditioned on Buyer's satisfaction with the Property, the suitability of the Property for Buyer's intended uses and the feasibility of this transaction in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion. Buyer shall have forty (40) business days from the Effective Date to conduct its investigation (the "Due Diligence Period") and to send written notice to Seller ("Approval Notice") that Buyer has satisfied or waived this condition. If Buyer fails to provide an Approval Notice to Seller and the Title Company that this condition is satisfied or waived (together with a conversion of the Earnest Money Note into a cash earnest money deposit) prior to 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on the final day of the Due Diligence Period, then this Agreement shall be deemed terminated, both Seller and Buyer shall be released and discharged from all further Packet Pg. 323 7.1.c obligations under this Agreement, and the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. The Earnest Money Note shall be returned to Buyer and, except as provided in Section 6.2, neither Party shall be subject to a claim by the other for damages of any kind with respect to this Agreement or Buyer's attempt to purchase the Property. 7. SELLER'S OBLIGATIONS. Before the Closing Seller shall, at its sole expense: 7.1. Promptly notify Buyer upon learning of any fact or event that would make any of the representations or warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement (including, without limitation, Buyer's Conditions Precedent and the representations and warranties set forth in section 12 hereof) untrue or misleading in any material respect or that would cause Seller to be in violation of any of its covenants or other obligations hereunder. 7.2. Notify Buyer promptly upon receiving notice of a claim or pending litigation affecting the Property, or notice of any event, transaction, or occurrence before Closing that would materially adversely affect the Property or any part thereof. 7.3. Not convey, mortgage, grant a deed of trust, or contract to do the foregoing or otherwise allow or consent to convey, abandon, relinquish, cloud or encumber title to the Property or any interest therein or part thereof without Buyer's consent. 7.4. Maintain any casualty, liability and hazard insurance currently carried by Seller in force with respect to the Property through the Closing without diminution in coverage. 7.5. Take no action that will adversely affect title to the Property. 8. DELIVERIES TO ESCROW HOLDER. �Q d 8.1. By Seller. Seller shall deliver or cause to be delivered to Escrow Holder on or prior to the Closing Date the following items, the delivery of each of which shall U- be a condition to the performance by Buyer of its obligations under this Agreement: as a. Deed. A statutory warranty deed, substantially in form and substance of Exhibit C attached hereto, duly executed and acknowledged by Seller (the "Deed"), conveying to Buyer or its designee title to the Property, free and clear of all liens, a encumbrances, restrictions and easements, except only the Permitted Exceptions . b. FIRPTA Affidavit. A certificate in form and substance attached hereto as Exhibit D, duly executed by Seller, evidencing that Seller is exempt from the withholding requirements of Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. C. ALTA Affidavits. Any affidavits, certifications or instruments, including any lien affidavits or mechanic's lien indemnifications, duly executed and acknowledged by Seller, as reasonably may be required by the Title Company in order to issue the Title Policy; PROVIDED THAT Seller shall not be required to deliver affidavits, 6 Packet Pg. 324 7.1.c certifications or indemnification instruments related to the actions or omissions of Buyer in its capacity as tenant on the Property. d. Title Insurance Policy. Evidence that the Title Company is committed to issue the Title Insurance Policy in conformance with section 4. e. Closing Certificates. A certificate of Seller dated as of the Closing Date certifying that all of Seller's representations and warranties remain true in all material respects as of the Closing Date, or if not, specifying the respect in which any representation or warranty is no longer true. f. Certificates of Authority. Such certificates as are necessary or required by the Title Company to evidence the authority of Seller and its signatories to execute the instruments to be executed by Seller in connection with this transaction, and evidence that the execution of such instruments is the official act and deed of Seller. g. Excise Tax Affidavit. A real estate excise tax affidavit signed by Seller or its agent; provided that Seller and Buyer acknowledge that no real estate excise tax will be due on the transfer. 8.2. By Buyer. Buyer shall deliver or cause to be delivered to Escrow Holder on or before the Closing Date: a. Closing Funds. Cash by federal funds, wire transfer or cashier's check in the amount necessary to pay the balance of the Purchase Price and Buyer's share of closing costs and prorations. r r b. Excise Tax Affidavit. A real estate excise tax affidavit signed < by Buyer or its agent. a c U- 9. CLOSE OF ESCROW. a� 9.1. Time. The close of escrow (the "Closing") shall occur no more than thirty (30) business days following the delivery of an Approval Notice from Buyer (the "Closing Date") stating that the investigation contingency in Section 6.4 has been satisfied or a waived, at the offices of Escrow Holder. When the Title Company is in a position to issue the Title Policy and all documents and funds have been deposited with Escrow Holder, Escrow Holder shall immediately close escrow as provided for in Section 9.2 below. The failure of either Seller or Buyer to be in position to close by the Closing Date, without lawful excuse under this Agreement, shall constitute a default by such Party. 9.2. Procedure. Escrow Holder shall close the transaction as follows: a. Obtain the release of the Property from any mortgage, mechanics or judgment liens described in the Commitment except the Permitted Exceptions; 7 Packet Pg. 325 7.1.c b. Record the real estate excise tax affidavit and pay any applicable fees and record the Deed; C. Complete the prorations; d. Deliver the Purchase Price less Seller's closing costs and prorations (as described in Sections 9.4(a) and (b) below) to Seller; e. Issue and deliver the Title Policy to Buyer (which may occur within 5 business days after the Closing Date); Deliver any other documents deposited by Seller to Buyer; and g. Forward to Buyer and Seller, in duplicate, a separate accounting of all funds received and disbursed for each Party and copies of all executed and recorded or filed documents submitted to Escrow Holder, with such recording and filing date endorsed thereon. 9.3. Incorporation of Escrow Instructions. This Agreement shall serve as escrow instructions, and an executed copy of this Agreement shall be deposited by Buyer with Escrow Holder following its execution. The Parties may execute additional escrow instructions provided that such additional escrow instructions shall not change the terms of this Agreement without mutual agreement of the Parties. 9.4. Closing Costs and Prorations. a a. Closing Costs. Buyer and Seller shall each pay their own a attorneys' fees. Buyer shall pay the cost of recording the Deed and one-half (1/2) of escrow fees. Seller shall pay one-half (1/2) of escrow fees, and the title insurance premium charged U_ by the Title Company for a standard owner's policy. If required by Buyer, Buyer shall pay the additional premium charged by the Title Company for extended coverage and the Endorsements and the cost of the survey. b. Prorations. At Closing, there shall be no prorations since a Buyer currently pays all taxes, general assessments, utilities and operating expenses relating to the Property pursuant to the Lease. Any special assessments against the Property in existence as of the Closing Date shall be assumed or paid by Buyer. 9.5. Possession. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Buyer upon Closing. 9.6. Deliveries Outside of Escrow. On or promptly after the Closing Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer outside of Escrow any of the following in Seller's possession: any books and records of account, contracts, leases and non -privileged leasing Packet Pg. 326 7.1.c correspondence pertaining to the Property, architectural and engineering plans, drawings and specifications for the improvements to the Property, any "As -Built" plans and specifications, original operating permits and certificates relating to use, occupancy or operation of the Property, any keys if any, used in operation of the Property. 10. BROKERAGE COMMISSION. Seller warrants to Buyer and Buyer warrants to Seller that each Party's sole contact with the other and with the Property regarding this transaction has been directly with the other Party and has not involved any commissioned - based broker or finder. Seller and Buyer further warrant to each other that no broker or finder can properly claim a right to a commission or finder's fee based upon contacts between the claimant and that Party with respect to the other Party or the Property. Each Party shall indemnify, defend and hold the other Party harmless from and against any loss, cost or expense, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and court costs, resulting from any claim for a fee or commission by any broker or finder in connection with the Property and this Agreement resulting from the indemnifying Party's actions. 11. CASUALTY OR CONDEMNATION. 11.1. If there is a condemnation of all or part of the Property initiated before Closing, Seller shall promptly notify Buyer and Buyer shall have the option for ten (10) days following the date the notice is received (a) to proceed with the Closing, in which event all condemnation proceeds already received by Seller by the Closing shall be paid to Buyer and the right to receive such proceeds not yet received by Seller shall be assigned to Buyer at the Closing, or (b) to terminate this Agreement. Unless this Agreement is terminated, Seller shall take no action with respect to any condemnation proceeding without the prior written consent of Buyer. 11.2. If any casualty costing $10,000.00 or more to repair has occurred to the Property before Closing, Buyer at its election may terminate this Agreement (in which case the Lease shall remain in effect) or proceed to close, and in the latter case Seller shall assign to Buyer all insurance proceeds attributable to the casualty. If there is a casualty to the Property costing less than $10,000.00 to repair, there will be no termination of this Agreement; such damage shall be repaired by the party required under the Lease to repair such damage. 12. REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS. 12.1. Seller's Representations, Warranties and Covenants. In addition to the representations, warranties and covenants contained elsewhere in this Agreement, Seller as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date makes the following representations, warranties and covenants: a. Title. Seller is the sole owner of the Property. At Closing, Buyer will acquire the entire fee simple estate and right, title and interest in and to the Property, free and clear of all recorded or unrecorded liens, encumbrances, covenants, restrictions, reservations, easements, options, tenancies, leases encroachments, claims or 0 Packet Pg. 327 7.1.c other matters affecting title or possession of the Property, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions and any other matters created by Buyer. b. Agreements to Transfer or Encumber. Except as shown in the Commitment, Seller has not committed nor obligated itself in any manner whatsoever to sell, lease or encumber the Property or any interest therein to any party other than Buyer. C. Bankruptcy, Etc. No bankruptcy, insolvency, rearrangement or similar action involving Seller or, to Seller's Knowledge (as defined below), the Property, whether voluntary or involuntary, is pending, threatened in writing by a third party, or contemplated by Seller. d. Litigation. There is no pending or, to Seller's Knowledge, threatened in writing, judicial, municipal or administrative proceedings with respect to Seller, this transaction or in any manner affecting the Property or any portion thereof or in which Seller is or will be a party by reason of Seller's ownership of the Property or any portion thereof. e. Notices. Seller has not received any written notices from any insurance companies, governmental agencies or from any other parties with respect to any violations or other matters concerning the Property. f. Good Standing and Due Authority. Seller has all requisite 2 power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to carry out its obligations v hereunder and the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been, and the M documents contemplated hereby will be, duly executed and delivered by Seller and r constitute the Seller's legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms. The consummation by Seller of the sale of the Property is not in < violation of or in conflict with nor does it constitute a default under any term or provision of a the terms of any agreement or instrument to which Seller is or may be bound, or of any provision of any applicable law, ordinance, rule or regulation of any governmental authority U- or of any provision of any applicable order, judgment or decree of any court, arbitrator or governmental authority. g. No Omissions. All representations and warranties made by Seller in this Agreement, and all information contained in any certificate furnished by Seller a to Buyer in connection with this transaction, are free from any untrue statement of material fact and do not omit to state any material facts necessary to make the statements contained herein or therein not misleading. The copies of any documents furnished to Buyer in connection with this transaction are true and complete copies of the documents they purport to be and to the Seller's Knowledge contain no untrue statement of material fact and do not omit to state any material facts necessary to make the statements contained therein not misleading. h. Leases, Service Contracts or Other Contracts. Other than the Lease between Buyer and Seller or as otherwise shown in the Commitment, Seller has 10 Packet Pg. 328 7.1.c not entered into any leases, service contracts or other contracts regarding or related to the Property. i. Mechanic's Liens. Seller has not directed that any labor, material or services be furnished in, on or about the Property or any part thereof. j. Assumption of Liabilities. Buyer, by virtue of the purchase of the Property, will not be required to satisfy any obligation of Seller arising prior to the Closing Date except as shown in the Commitment. As used herein, "Seller's Knowledge" means the present, actual knowledge, with no duty of due diligence or inquiry, of Stewart Mhyre, Executive Director Business & Operations, and Brian Harding, Facilities Director. Such persons have not undertaken or inquired into (having no duty to undertake or to inquire into) any independent investigation or verification of the matters set forth in any representation or warranty, including without limitation an investigation or review of any documents, certificates, agreements or information that may be in, or may hereafter come into, the possession of Seller. Buyer acknowledges that the individuals named above are named solely for the purpose of defining and narrowing the scope of Seller's knowledge and not for the purpose of imposing any liability on or creating any duties running from such individuals to Buyer. Buyer covenants that it will bring no action of any kind against such individuals related to or arising out of any representations and warranties made by Seller herein. 12.2 Buyer's Representation. Buyer represents and warrants that as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date, Buyer is a Washington municipal r corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing in the state of Washington. Buyer has all requisite power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to < carry out its obligations under this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this a Agreement. U- This Agreement has been initially executed by the Mayor of the City of Edmonds as an offer to purchase that is expressly contingent on the approval of this Agreement by the Edmonds City Council. This Agreement shall not constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against the Buyer until the Edmonds City Council has taken action to approve it during an open public meeting. The delivery of the Approval Notice referenced in a Section 6.4 shall constitute irrevocable evidence that this contingency has been satisfied. Subject to the foregoing City Council approval contingency, the consummation by Buyer of the purchase of the Property is not in violation of or in conflict with nor does it constitute a default under any term or provision of the bylaws of Buyer, or any of the terms of any agreement or instrument to which Buyer is or may be bound, or of any provision of any applicable law, ordinance, rule or regulation of any governmental authority or of any provision of any applicable order, judgment or decree of any court, arbitrator or governmental authority. Packet Pg. 329 7.1.c 13. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. 14. INDEMNIFICATION. 14.1. Seller's Indemnity. Seller shall pay, protect, defend, indemnify and hold Buyer harmless from and against any and all loss, liability, damage and expense suffered or incurred by reason of (a) the breach of any representation, warranty or agreement of Seller set forth in this Agreement, (b) the failure of Seller to perform any obligation required by this Agreement to be performed by Seller or (c) any injuries to persons or property on or about the Property from any cause occasioned in whole or in part by any acts or omissions of the Seller, its representatives, employees, contractors or suppliers that occurred before Closing. Seller shall defend any claim covered by this indemnity using counsel reasonably acceptable to Buyer. 14.2. Buyer's Indemnity. Buyer shall pay, protect, defend, indemnify and hold Seller harmless from and against any and all loss, liability, damage and expense suffered or incurred by reason of (a) the breach of any representation, warranty or agreement of Buyer set forth in this Agreement, (b) the failure of Buyer to perform any obligation required by this Agreement or in the Lease to be performed by Buyer or (c) the ownership, maintenance, and/or operation of the Property after Closing by Buyer. Buyer shall defend any claim covered by this indemnity using counsel reasonably acceptable to Seller. 15. SURVIVAL. The covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made in this Agreement shall survive the Closing unimpaired for six (6) months and shall not merge into the Deed and the recordation thereof. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire integrated a agreement of the Parties, including all of the covenants and conditions between the Parties a with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior correspondence, agreements and understandings, both verbal and written. No addition or U- modification of any term or provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless set forth in writing and signed by Seller and Buyer. The Parties do not intend to confer any benefit under this Agreement to any person, firm or corporation other than the Parties. 17. DEFAULT; REMEDIES Q 17.1. Specific Performance. This Agreement pertains to the conveyance of real property, the unique nature of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties. Consequently, if Seller breaches or defaults under this Agreement or any of the representations, warranties, terms, covenants, conditions or provisions hereof, Buyer shall have the right to either (a) demand specific performance of this Agreement; or (b) to terminate this Agreement upon written notice without liability to Seller. 17.2. Attorneys' Fees. If either Party brings an action or other proceeding against the other Party to enforce any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof or any 12 Packet Pg. 330 7.1.c instrument executed pursuant to this Agreement, or by reason of any breach or default hereunder or thereunder, the Party prevailing in any such action or proceeding shall be paid all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees by the other Party, and in the event any judgment is obtained by the prevailing Party all such costs and attorneys' fees shall be included in the judgment. 18. NOTICES. All written notices required to be given pursuant to the terms hereof shall be either delivered personally or deposited in the United States mail, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed to the addresses listed below with copies to the Parties listed after such address: SELLER BUYER Edmonds School District #15 20420 68th Ave West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Attn: Stewart Mhyre Fax: (425) 431-7198 City of Edmonds 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Carrie Hite Fax: (425) 771-0247 The foregoing addresses may be changed by written notice to the other Party as provided < herein. Mailed notice properly given shall be deemed received four (4) days after deposit in a the mail. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document or notice, and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission, shall be the same as delivery of an U- original. At the request of either Party or the Escrow Holder, the Parties will confirm facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document. 19. PARTIAL INVALIDITY. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or a unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby; and each such term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 20. WAIVERS. No waiver of any breach of any covenant or provision in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach thereof, or of any other covenant or provision in this Agreement. No extension of time for performance of any obligation or act shall be deemed an extension of the time for performance of any other obligation or act. 13 Packet Pg. 331 7.1.c 21. CONSTRUCTION. Captions are solely for the convenience of the Parties and are not a part of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be construed as if it had been prepared by one of the Parties, but rather as if both Parties had prepared it. If the date on which Buyer or Seller is required to take any action under the terms of this Agreement is not a business day, the action shall be taken on the next succeeding business day. 22. TIME. Time is of the essence for every provision of this Agreement. 23. FORCE MAJEURE. Performance by Seller or Buyer of their obligations under this Agreement shall be extended by the period of delay caused by force majeure. Force majeure is war, natural catastrophe, strikes, walkouts or other labor industrial disturbance, order of any government, court or regulatory body having jurisdiction, shortages, blockade, embargo, riot, civil disorder, or any similar cause beyond the reasonable control of the Party who is obligated to render performance (but excluding financial inability to perform, however caused). 24. SUCCESSORS. The terms, conditions and covenants contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto. Buyer shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of Seller, which consent may be withheld or conditioned in Seller's sole and absolute discretion. 25. APPLICABLE LAw. This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the State of Washington. Venue for any dispute shall be in Snohomish County. 26. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS. The Recitals and Exhibits are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. 27. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, any of which shall be deemed an original. 28. DATE. This Agreement is made this day of , 2015. ]SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW] 14 ,1 Q Packet Pg. 332 7.1.c SELLER: Edmonds School District #15 A Washington municipal corporation M Name: Title: 15 V V a+ Q Packet Pg. 333 7.1.c BUYER: City of Edmonds A municipal corporation of the State of Washington M Name: David O. Earling Title: Mayor 16 Of a Packet Pg. 334 7.1.c EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit A Legal Description and Map Exhibit B Property Depiction Exhibit C Form of Deed Exhibit D Form of Non -Foreign Certificate EXHIBIT 3.3 Earnest Money Note 17 Of a Packet Pg. 335 7.1.c EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, Block 99, Lots 1 through 40, inclusive, Block 100, and Lots 21 through 40, inclusive, Block 101, City of Edmonds, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, pages 39 and 39A, records of Snohomish County, Washington. UM 01 Q Packet Pg. 336 7.1.c EXHIBIT B — Property Depiction 19 32 d U. Q Packet Pg. 337 7.1.c EXHIBIT C FORM OF DEED Return Address Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): 1. Statutory Warranty Deed Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: N/A (on page _ of documents(s)) Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials): 1. Edmonds School District No. 15 2. e Additional names on page _ of document. Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials): 1. City of Edmonds 2. e Additional names on page of document. Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) e Full legal is on page 3-of document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 20 d ii 2 0 Q Packet Pg. 338 7.1.c STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Grantor, EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15, a Washington municipal corporation, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10) in hand paid and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, conveys and warrants to THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington municipal corporation, that certain real property located in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, more particularly described on EXHIBIT A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, subject to the matters shown on EXHIBIT B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Dated this day of , 201 Grantor: EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 Nick Brossoit, Superintendent 01 Q 00358-0859/128230360.1 Packet Pg. 339 7.1.c STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF On this day of , 201_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Nick Brossoit, to me known to be the person who signed as Superintendent of EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO., 15, the municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was duly elected, qualified and acting as said Superintendent of the municipal corporation and that he was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (Signature of Notary) (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires: 01 Q 00358-0859/128230360.1 Packet Pg. 340 7.1.c EXHIBIT A TO DEED Legal Description 32 d U. Q 00358-0859/128230360.1 Packet Pg. 341 7.1.c EXHIBIT B TO DEED Title Exceptions 32 d U. Q 00358-0859/128230360.1 Packet Pg. 342 7.1.c EXHIBIT D FORM OF NON -FOREIGN CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATE OF NON -FOREIGN STATUS Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that a transferee (buyer) of a U. S. real property interest must withhold tax if the transferor (seller) is a foreign person. To inform the transferee (buyer) that withholding of tax is not required upon the disposition of a U.S. real property interest by EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15, a Washington municipal corporation ("Seller"), the undersigned hereby certifies the following on behalf of Seller: 1. Seller is not a foreign corporation, foreign partnership, foreign trust, or foreign estate (as those terms are defined in the Internal Revenue Code and Income Tax Regulations). 2. Seller's U. S. employer identification number is 91-6001871. 3. Seller is not a disregarded entity as defined in § 1.1445-2(b)(2)(iii) of the Internal Revenue Code. 4. Seller's office address is: 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 5. Seller understands that this certification may be disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service by the transferee (buyer) and that any false statement contained herein could be punished by fine, imprisonment, or both. Under penalties of perjury, the undersigned declares that he has examined this certification and to the best of his knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete, and he further declares that he has the authority to sign this document on behalf of Seller. Executed as of the SELLER: day of , 201_, at Washington. EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 Nick Brossoit, Superintendent 01 a 00358-0859/128230360.1 Packet Pg. 343 7.1.c EXHIBIT 3.3 EARNEST MONEY NOTE $50,000.00 Edmonds, WA , 2015 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay in lawful money of the United States, to the order of CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) to be held as the earnest money Deposit in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Agreement defined below, for the account of EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 ("Payee"). This note shall be paid as follows: Upon demand, after expiration of the Due Diligence Period, as that term is defined in Section 6.4, and otherwise pursuant to the provisions of, that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated , 2015 ("Agreement") between the undersigned as buyer ("Buyer") and Payee as seller with respect to certain real property located in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, unless (i) Buyer has terminated the Agreement on or before the expiration of the Due Diligence Period or (ii) the transaction contemplated under the Agreement has closed and Buyer has paid Payee the full purchase price as set forth in the Agreement. This note shall not bear interest if paid when due. If this note shall be placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or if suit is brought on this a note after default in any payment, the undersigned promises and agrees to pay reasonable a attorneys' fees incurred thereby. If the undersigned defaults in the payment of this note, it shall bear interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum from the date due until paid in full. U- This note shall be construed according to the laws of the state of Washington. as E CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington municipal corporation 2 a By: _ Name: Title: 00358-0859/128230360.1 Packet Pg. 344 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/5/2016 Critical Area Ordinance Update Staff Lead/Author: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Initiated By: Background/History All cities and counties in Washington State are required to adopt critical areas regulations by the Growth Management Act (GMA). As defined by the GMA, "Critical areas" include the following areas and ecosystems: (a) wetlands; (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water; (c) fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas; (d) frequently flooded areas; and (e) geologically hazardous areas." [RCW 36.70A.030(5)] In 2015, the City worked with an environmental consulting firm, ESA, on updating the City's critical area regulations as required by the GMA. The update began with a review of the City's 2004 Best Available Science (BAS) report for which ESA prepared the 2015 BAS Addendum. This information, along with staff experiences implementing the critical area regulations over the last 10 years, was used to propose an update to the City's critical area regulations contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 23.40 - 23.90, as well as the portion of the building code that addresses frequently flooded areas (a typed of critical area) for likely sea rise. The Best Available Science and Gap Analysis Matrix summarize proposed changes to the code. ESA also prepared a memorandum that addressed some flexibility that is being proposed in the updated critical area regulations following the format of WAC 365-195-915. Staff also prepared a Q & A memorandum that addressed some general concepts and specific questions that arose during review of the critical area regulations. The On October 29, 2015, Washington State Department of Ecology submitted a letter of support for the draft critical area regulations. The Planning Board reviewed the proposed changes to the critical area regulations over the course of five meetings and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council in July 2015. The City Council began review of the critical area regulations in September 2015 and reviewed the updated critical area regulations over five Council meetings in 2015. At the last Council meeting of 2015, the City Council proposed a number of amendments to the draft critical area regulations which were adopted in Ordinance No. 4017 and subsequently vetoed by the Mayor. Following reconsideration of the Mayor's veto, the Council discussed returning to review the version of the critical area regulations that were considered at the December 15, 2015 meeting. At the February 2, 2016, the Council discussed returning to the December 15, 2015 version of the critical area regulations as contained in Exhibit 1 and providing staff potential amendments for discussion at the next Council meeting for critical area discussion. An initial set of proposed Council amendments were discussed at the February 23, 2016 Council meeting. The Council decided to hold another public hearing Packet Pg. 345 7.2 on the "universe" of potential amendments to the draft critical area regulations. A second public hearing on the critical area regulation and potential amendments was held on March 15, 2016. Staff Recommendation Continue discussion and decide which potential amendments to carry forward so specific language for the amendments can be refined and incorporated in the draft critical area regulations. Narrative Following the March 15, 2016 Public Hearing, the City Council began reviewing the potential amendments to the draft critical area regulations contained in Exhibit 1 (March 15, 2016 Council minutes excerpt contained in Exhibit 8). The Council took action on six of the potential amendments on March 15th. Those actions are summarized below. Council will continue review of the potential amendments at this Council meeting. Amendments City Council took action on at the March 15, 2016 Council Meeting Amendment LB: Rename provision to physically separated/potentially isolated or "interrupted buffer." Council voted to rename of the physically separated/functionally isolated buffer provision to "interrupted buffer." Amendment 3: ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.b.iv - Hazard Tree Replacement - The proposed Council amendment is to change the required diameter of deciduous replacement trees from one inch dbh to one to two inches dbh. Council voted to make proposed amendment. Amendments 4: Definitions A. ECDC 23.40.320 - Normal Maintenance of Vegetation Definition "Normal maintenance of vegetation" means removal of shrubs/non-woody vegetation and trees (less than 4-inch diameter at breast height) that occurs at least every other year. Maintenance also may include tree topping that has been previously approved by the City in the past 5 years. Council voted to make proposed amendment C. Add definition for Best Available Science. Council voted to insert reference to ECDC 23.40.310 (Best Available Science) in the definitions section. D. Move definitions from Part Vito ECDC 23.40.010 after Purpose section. Council voted to make proposed amendment. Amendment 11: CDC 23.40.040.D - Areas Adjacent to Critical Areas - The proposed amendment would keep only first sentence and delete the remainder of the section, so ECDC 23.40.040.D would read as Packet Pg. 346 7.2 follows: Areas Adjacent to Critical Areas Subject to Regulation. Areas adjacent to critical areas shall be considered to be within the jurisdiction of these requirements and regulations to support the intent of this title and ensure protection of the functions and values of critical areas. Council voted to make the proposed amendment. POTENTIAL COUNCIL AMENDMENTS REQUIRING ACTION 1. ECDC 23.40.220.C.4 - Physically Separated/Functionally Isolated Buffers (Exhibit 1, pg. 18) Description of draft provision: This is a proposed new section within the critical area regulations to address situations staff has encountered over the years. Edmonds is a largely urbanized area, which was mainly developed prior to any environmental regulations. As a result, properties are technically within in a critical area "buffer" when measured from the edge of a stream or wetland. ECDC 23.40.320 defines buffer as: "Buffer" means the designated area immediately next to and a part of a steep slope or landslide hazard area and which protects slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and landslide hazards reasonably necessary to minimize risks to persons or property; or a designated area immediately next to and part of a stream or wetland that is an integral part of the stream or wetland ecosystem. In many cases, there is a road, structure or other development between a property within a "buffer" and the critical area which creates a physical and functional break between the property and the critical area. To address this situation, a new provision was added to the allowed activities section of the critical area regulation in ECDC 23.40.220 - Development Proposals within Physically Separated and Functionally Isolated Stream or Wetland Buffers (Exhibit 1, pg. 28) . The draft provision defines the minimum distance for the separated buffer (12-feet) and criteria for considering whether an area is functionally isolated (hydrologic, geologic, and/or biological habitat connection). The determination of physically separated/functionally isolated may be made by the director (or designee), or the director may require the determination to be made by a qualified professional. Potential Council Amendments: Amendment 1.A is language that would replace the draft language on page 18 of Exhibit 1. A. Development Proposals within Physically Separated and Potentially Isolated Stream or Wetland Buffers. Adjacent areas that may be physically separated and potentially functionally isolated from a stream or wetland due to existing, legally established structures or paved areas may be exempted from the prescribed buffer widths if proven scientifically to be functionally isolated from the stream or wetland. The Director will require the applicant to provide a site assessment Packet Pg. 347 7.2 and functional analysis documentation report by a qualified Critical Area Consultant that demonstrates the separated buffer area is functionally isolated. The Director shall consider the hydrologic, geologic, and/or biological habitat connection potential and the extent and permanence of the physical separation. If the Director determines, based on the report and other available information, that the physically separated stream or wetland buffer area may be functionally isolated, the Director will provide the background information and a recommendation to the Council that an exemption be approved. Discussion: The proposed Amendment LA would maintain the flexibility to allow property improvements within a physically separated and functionally (potentially) isolated buffer, but requires the determination of functionally isolated buffers to be made by a Qualified Critical Area Consultant. The scientific determination may result in additional costs to property owners when there are clear situations of physically separated and functionally isolated buffers. This may not be a problem for property owners where larger scale improvements are planned but could be relatively costly for very small improvements, such as a shed on a residential lot. Council review of this and other critical area decisions are discussed below under proposed Amendment 2. 2. Council Review/Critical Area Decision Processes Existing code: Under the existing code, the City Council would only review a critical area decision in a closed record review of a Type III-B permit process. This could include the appeal of a critical area variance application or other Type III-B permit which included a critical area review aspect. According to ECDC 20.01.003, critical area determinations are Type I decisions and a critical area variance is a Type III-B decision. There is a discrepancy in the existing code where ECDC 23.40.210.0 notes that a critical area variance shall be processed as a Type III -A decision. The table in ECDC 20.01.003 should be corrected to reflect a Type III -A process for critical area variances. Potential Council Amendments: A. Include the City Council in the decision making process for certain critical area decisions such as physically separated/functionally isolated buffers, restoration projects, and exemptions. B. Consider adding a decision matrix or some threshold for which projects would include the City Council in the decision making process. C. Consider amending the decision process for certain types of critical area decision (i.e. Type I, Type II, Type III or other new process type). Discussion: The City Council is generally not involved in the administration of the development code, with the exception of closed record appeals of Type III-B decisions and review of final plats and Planned Residential Developments. Typically, the Council establishes the policy and adopts regulations and the administration implements and enforces the regulations as adopted by the Council. With the exception of critical area variances which are heard by the Hearing Examiner as a Type III-B process (appealable to City Council), critical area determinations are Type I staff decisions pursuant to ECDC 20.01.003. Packet Pg. 348 7.2 Having the City Council review critical area determinations appears to insert public opinion into a review process that is supposed to be based on science. Additionally, having the City Council involved in the critical area decision process would create appearance of fairness issues if Councilmembers have ex parte communications with applicants or other citizens on any specific proposal. The underlying concern from Council appears to be that certain critical area decisions should be subject to a higher level of scrutiny. One method for higher scrutiny is provided in Exhibit 2, which contains draft code language and associated amendments to other sections of the ECDC for a critical area "contingent review" process where certain types of critical area decisions (restoration projects, physically separated/functionally isolated buffer, and buffer reductions) would require public notice and provide an opportunity for citizens to request the proposal have a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Exhibit 3 contains an example of how this proposed process would play out on a specific project example. Staff will run through this example during the Council meeting. 4. Definitions Existing and draft code: The critical area definitions are currently located at the end of the Environmentally Critical Areas General Provisions (ECDC 23.40) in Part VI (Exhibit 1, pg. 28). A few definitions have been updated during the current critical area regulations update process and some new definitions have been proposed. One of the new proposed definitions is "normal maintenance of vegetation." The "normal maintenance of vegetation" definition is tied to the operation, maintenance, or report exemption contained in ECDC 23.40.230.C.2 (Exhibit 1, pg. 22) which notes that operation and maintenance includes "normal maintenance of vegetation." ECDC 23.40.230.C.2 together with the definition of "normal maintenance of vegetation" essentially allows the clearing of saplings up to 3 inches diameter of breast height in critical areas and critical area buffers. Potential Council Amendments: B. Add definition for "Council" to reflect "Edmonds City Council." Discussion: With regard to Amendment 4.13, adding a definition for Council to reflect the Edmonds City Council; as currently drafted, the critical area regulations do not contain a reference to Council. Furthermore, even if a reference to the Council were added, a definition is unnecessary because ECDC 21.15.030 already defines City Council or Council, as follows: "City council (or council) means the city council of the city of Edmonds." 5. ECDC 23.90.040.0 - Retention of Vegetation on Subdividable and Undeveloped Parcels Existing and Draft Code: Packet Pg. 349 7.2 The existing ECDC 23.90.040.0 requires the retention or establishment of a minimum of 30 percent native vegetation on undeveloped or redeveloped property within the RS-12 and RS-20 zones in the City of Edmonds. The existing provision has characteristics similar to a provision in King County's critical area ordinance that was struck down by the Washington Court of Appeals, Division I, in Citizens Alliance for Property Rights v. Sims, 145 Wash. App. 649, 1998. The existing code is similar to the King County provision in that it is too generally applied without considering site specific factors such as the type of habitat this provision is intended to protect. The proposed changes in the draft ECDC 23.90.040 (Exhibit 1, pg. 84) focus standards on site -specific characteristics (presence of streams, wetlands, and/or a landslide hazard area) and provide more definition to specific habitat features to be retained by this provision (10 inch dbh trees make up 70% of canopy coverage). When these conditions are not present on a particular property, the director may waive the provisions of ECDC 23.90.040.C. Potential Council Amendments: The Councilmembers have offered up three potential amendments to ECDC 23.90.040.C. A. Include RS-8 and RS-10 in addition to RS-12 and RS-20 zones to where this provision would apply. B. Consider requiring a different percentage of coverage for the RS-8 and RS-10, such as 20% percent as opposed to the 30% requirement for RS-12 and RS-20 zones. C. Change "...native trees over 10 inches in dbh make up more than 70 percent of the canopy cover" to "...native trees over 6 inches in dbh make up more than 40 percent of the canopy cover." Discussion: Amendment 5.A to include RS-8 and RS-10 zoned properties has the potential to greatly expand the area that this provision may apply. There are approximately 1,416 acres of RS-12 and RS-20 zoned properties in the City of Edmonds. There are another 2,406 acres of RS-8 and RS-10 zoned properties in the City. So there is a potential to more than double the area that this provision may apply from 1,416 acres to 3,822 acres. The result would be that this provision could potentially apply to all areas of the City except the Bowl which is zoned RS-6. In addition to the zone, in order for this provision to apply, the site must also contain a landslide hazard area; stream or stream buffer; or a wetland or wetland buffer. The RS-12 and RS-20 zones were established in part because of the presence of critical areas (steep slopes in particular). The Comprehensive Plan states that the designation associated with the RS-12 and RS-20 zones is "Single Family Resource." It also states that RS-8 and RS-10 zones are associated with the "Single Family Urban" designations. The RS-8 and RS-10 zoned properties contain less steep slopes and other critical areas and are more urban in nature. In reality, there may be fewer properties in the RS-8 and RS-10 zones that have critical areas triggering the native vegetation retention requirement. Amendment 5.13 would only apply if Amendment 5.A is adopted. The numbers in the zone correspond to the minimum lot size; RS-8 requires a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet, RS-10 requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 feet, and so forth. Requiring 30% native vegetation retention on RS-8 and RS-10 zones would have a greater impact on developable area for a home compared to the RS-12 and Packet Pg. 350 7.2 RS-20 zones. Amendment 5.0 may trigger the requirements of this provision in more areas than the original proposal. The 10 inch dbh and 70% canopy coverage of the draft provision was proposed by our environmental consultant, ESA, because of specific habitat value provided by that size of trees. The proposed amendment is not tied to any specific habitat per se, but with a desire to preserve more canopy coverage within the City. Given that the RS-8 and RS-10 zones are identified for urban development in the Comprehensive Plan, and the proposed Amendment 5.0 is largely to preserve additional canopy coverage, proposed Amendments 5A. and 5.13 may not be appropriate amendments for the critical area regulations, but rather more appropriately addressed through canopy coverage goals developed through an Urban Forest Management Plan. As the City develops its Urban Forest Management Plan, the City may further identify particular areas where tree retention is desired, or specifically identify habitat corridors where the native vegetation retention requirements of this provision should be applied. The Urban Forest Management Plan could also refine the type of habitat structure this provision is intended to preserve and that information could be used to further refine the native vegetation provision in ECDC 23.90.040.C. 6. Frequently Flood Area Amendments in ECDC 19.00.025 and ECDC 21.40.030 Draft Provisions: While frequently flooded areas are by definition a type of critical area, development within the flood zones in Edmonds is specifically guided by building code requirements: ECDC 19.00.025, the International Residential Code (IRC) for residential development, and the International Building Code (IBC) for commercial development. As part of the critical areas update, two provisions are proposed for development within frequently flooded areas. The first is an addition to the building code in ECDC 19.00.025 (Exhibit 1, pg. 91) that requires all structures in the coastal flood hazard zone to be constructed two feet above the base flood elevation. The second proposal is a change to the definition of height in ECDC 21.40.030 (Exhibit 1, pg. 91). Where existing grade along the waterfront is at or below the base flood elevation, requiring structures to be built two feet above base flood elevation would effectively eliminate two feet of the allowable height for a structure. In order to maintain existing height allowances, the Planning Board recommended modifying the definition of height contained in ECDC 21.40.030 to allow for the height of structures within the Coastal High Hazard Areas to be measured from two feet above base flood elevation, thus compensating for the impact of the new requirement. Potential Council Amendment: This proposed amendment is to not include the amendments related to frequently flooded areas contained in in ECDC 19.00.025 and 21.40.030 (Exhibit 1, pg. 91). The comment behind this is that the proposed amendments for 19.00.025 and 21.40.030 are not technically part of the Critical Areas Ordinance. Additionally, it was noted the proposed changes are in anticipation of FEMA flood hazard maps which have not been issued by the Federal government. Discussion: Packet Pg. 351 7.2 While the proposed code amendments are not contained within ECDC 23.40 - 23.90 (the part of the municipal code typically thought of as the Critical Area Regulations), frequently flooded areas actually are a critical area by definition. Rather than include the amendments in 23.70 - Frequently Flooded Areas, the proposed requirement requiring all structures to be constructed two feet above base flood elevation is more appropriately included in the Building Code which also regulates development within the flood plain. The proposed amendment to the definition of height is intended to compensate for the requirement to build above base flood elevation in order to maintain existing height allowances. The sustainability element of the Comprehensive Plan notes, "Focusing on short-term, expedient solutions will only make actions necessary to support sustainability more difficult to take in the future. For example, in the areas of environmental issues and climate change, deferred action now will only make the cumulative effects more difficult to resolve in the future. The familiar GMA-based 20-year planning timeframe will not be sufficient - planning for sustainability must take an even longer view." (Comprehensive Plan, page 20). While updated FEMA flood hazard maps have not been adopted yet (current scheduled effective date is Summer 2017), it is important to consider the potential impacts of developing on the shoreline, including sea level rise and the impending updated flood plain maps. 7. Council Status Reports Existing Code and Draft Code: The existing or draft code does not currently contain language for status reports to the City Council. For developments that require critical area reports and mitigation, the existing code requires a monitoring program and monitoring reports to determine if the performance standards are being met. Potential Council Amendment: The following language has been proposed for requiring regular status reports on critical area regulations implementation. The Director shall prepare regular status reports on current critical area permits to assist with the monitoring of the objective to protecting and enhance critical areas as described in ECDC 23.40.060. The reports shall be presented biannually to the Council and will be derived from data collected from individual critical area reports and monitoring required in this title. The report will include data from ECDC 23.40.100 Critical Area Requirements, ECDC 23.40.140 Mitigation Plans, ECDC 23.50.030 Wetland Reporting Requirements, and ECDC 23.90.020 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Reporting Requirements, as well as any other provisions deemed necessary by the Council for the status reports. Each biannual status report shall include the following for the period reported: how much mitigation was required, types of mitigation granted, how many buffer reductions were granted, how many projects included buffer increases, how many required off -site mitigation, anticipated mitigation success in replacing wetland acreage and function, how many buffer averaging with buffer enhancements were granted, how many buffer reductions with buffer enhancements were granted, the types of enhancements, anticipated increased buffer functioning from enhancements in terms of stream and fish habitat protection where appropriate, number of developments within footprint of existing development, number of in -Lieu Fee programs that were granted, number of credits used, number of variances issued, number of any exemptions granted, number of violations that occurred, and how much non -compensatory restoration is being done. Packet Pg. 352 7.2 Discussion: Staff can provide periodic reports to the City Council; however, the level of detail in proposed report language would require additional resources to set up a special detailed tracking system. With current resources, the administration could periodically provide the Council important basic data - for example, how many buffer reductions were granted and where, number of critical area determinations, and number and general type of interrupted buffer determinations. Instead of the proposed language above, staff suggests the following language to be included in the adopting ordinance for reports to City Council: The Director will provide a report to the City Council during the 15Y and 3rd quarter each year, summarizing critical area decisions that have been made since the previous report. The report will include information such as, the number and type of critical area decisions that have been made, including information on buffers and enhancements approved for each applicable decision, a description of each approved restoration project, example projects, and other information specifically requested by the Council following the previous report. 8. Appendices Existing and Draft Code: Neither the existing or draft code has appendices; however, information regarding mapping is included in the code. For instance see ECDC 23.50.010.D (Exhibit 1, pg. 36), 23.80.030.A (Exhibit 1, pg. 65), and ECDC 23.90.010.0 (Exhibit 1, pg. 78) for specific maps that are referenced in the critical area regulations. Maps displaying this and other information are included as Exhibits 4 - 6. These maps are general and not regulatory; specific location and classification of critical areas must be made on a site -specific basis by a qualified professional. Potential Council Amendments: Two amendments have been proposed regarding adopting critical area maps and an inventory of all critical areas within the City of Edmonds as new appendices in the critical area regulations. A. Make new Appendix A formally adopting critical areas maps such as those in Exhibits 4 - 6. B. Make new Appendix B with an inventory of all critical areas within the City of Edmonds including buffer widths. Discussion: Information on the maps included in Exhibits 4 - 6 are not at a scale or level of accuracy to be relied upon solely for determining the presence or absence of critical areas on any given property. As noted by the references to maps above, much of the information on these maps are controlled and updated by other state and federal agencies include Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Geological Survey, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. These maps are to be used as a Packet Pg. 353 7.2 reference only and specific locations of critical areas must be identified on the ground for any given site. Proposed Amendment 8.13 to inventory all critical areas in the City of Edmonds would be a massive and expensive task. In order to develop an inventory and assign associated buffers to every critical area in the City would involve sending a team of wetland scientists, stream biologists, and geotechnical engineers out to visit every single property within the City and classify each stream and wetland in accordance with the criteria established in the critical area regulations. They would need permission from the property owners. Furthermore, the draft regulations in the ECDC 23.80.070 (Exhibit 1, pg. 71) requires geotechnical engineers to assign setbacks on a case by case basis, so it would be impossible to establish the geotechnical portion of Amendment 8.13 without knowing specifics of individual projects. Additionally, critical areas are not static in space or time. Streams change courses. Bluffs retreat. Wetlands expand and contract given environmental conditions. The City of Edmonds has a web map that could potentially make the GIS information staff uses available to the public at large. However, the map must have disclaimers noting it is for information purposes only and that the information is subject to independent verification. A concern is that people will make decisions based on information on the maps that could lead to incorrect decisions about critical areas and/or property. 9. ECDC 23.40.215 - Restoration Projects Draft provision: The draft Critical Area Restoration Projects section in ECDC 23.40.215 (Exhibit 1, pg. 16) is modeled after the Washington State Shoreline Management Act provision (RCW 90.58.580) that grants relief for shoreline restoration projects from shoreline master program development standards and use regulations. The purpose of the provision is to avoid placing undue restrictions on opportunities for stream daylighting and/or wetland creation that could result if standard buffers are required, and thus providing a disincentive for implementing restoration projects. This provision would only apply to restoration projects that are not required as mitigation for a development proposal. The proposed relief is a reduction to the expanded buffer that would otherwise result from the restoration project. Two types of projects would be eligible for relief under ECDC 23.40.215: The daylighting of a stream, or Creation or expansion of a wetland that would cause a landward expansion of the wetland and/or wetland buffer. A restoration project may apply a buffer equal to 75% the expanded buffer, or the restoration project proponent may request the expanded buffer be reduced to a minimum of 50% of the standard buffer if certain criteria apply. Potential Council Amendment: The proposed amendment is to replace the draft language in ECDC 23.40.215 (Exhibit 1, pg. 16) with the following: A. Restoration of historic ecological functions of critical areas under this title is encouraged. When Packet Pg. 354 7.2 a critical area restoration project is proposed that is not required as mitigation for a development proposal, the Director may recommend relief from standard critical area buffer requirements if the restoration project involves: 1. The daylighting of a stream or tidal channel, or 2. Expansion of a wetland that would cause a landward expansion of the wetland buffer. B. The restoration project proposal will include a proposed buffer width for the project that is developed from an assessment by a qualified Critical Area Consultant on the buffer width necessary to ensure that the restoration project is successful and the ecological functions of the areas adjacent to the stream or wetland are preserved. C. The Director will consider the proposed buffer width along with hydrologic, geologic, and other habitat data for the site to determine if the project warrants a buffer width that deviates from the standard critical area buffer widths. D. If the Director determines that a reduced buffer width may be appropriate for the proposed restoration project, the Director will recommend to the Council that Appendix B of this title be amended to allow the reduced buffer width for the proposed restoration site. Discussion: Edmonds is a largely urbanized area, which was mainly developed prior to the establishment of any environmental regulations. As a result, streams where placed in pipes and wetlands filled or drained. One goal of the draft restoration project section and the critical area regulations update in general was to look for opportunities to improve the existing conditions of the City's critical areas. Staff has a number of concerns with the language in proposed Amendment 9. Under subsection A, the language regarding "restoration of historic ecological functions" hints that a restoration project will have to return a site to its "historic" state. Edmonds will never be returned to its pre -European development state. The last part of subsection B requires the areas adjacent to the stream or wetland be "preserved". Again, we have to look at a specific point in time. There may be no ecological value of the adjacent area prior to the restoration project, so we don't want to preserve the existing condition. The Amendment language also has the project proponent propose the buffer width for a restoration project. The code should at least provide some boundaries for a required buffer width. Council review is discussed above under proposed Amendment 2 and the use of appendices is discussed under proposed Amendment 8. Rather than the potential amendment language above, staff suggests changing the draft language for restoration projects in Exhibit 1 as follows: 23.40.215 Critical Area Restoration Projects The City of Edmonds encourages restoration projects that will provide a net environmental benefit to the existing state of the City's critical areas. In order to avoid disincentives to such protects, the City of Edmonds may grant relief from the critical area development standards when the following applies: A. When a critical area restoration project is proposed that is not required as mitigation for a development proposal, the City of Edmonds may grant relief from standard critical area buffer requirements if the restoration project involves: 1. The daylighting of a stream, or 2. Creation or expansion of a wetland that would cause a landward expansion of the wetland and/or wetland buffer B. At the time a restoration project is proposed, a buffer shall be established that will apply to the Packet Pg. 355 7.2 restoration project boundary. Restoration project buffers shall be established according to the following requirements: 1. For the purposes of this section, an expanded buffer is that portion of the stream or wetland buffer that extended landward as a result of the restoration project. A huffer may be applied W the FesteFed penien A-f the Stream A—r vVetla.nd that S Ret less than 0 of 32. The project proponent may request a reduced buffer of between up to 50%ate 75of the expanded buffer associated with the class of stream or category of wetland. The following criteria will be used by the City in reviewing the request for a reduced buffer: a. The Director determines that applying a:5% expan expanded standard critical area buffer would significantly limit the use of the property for existing or permitted uses, thus making the restoration project infeasible; b. The city will consider the proposed buffer width along with hydrologic, geologic and other habitat data for the site in evaluation the requested expanded buffer relief; Jac. The proposed expanded buffer relief is the minimum necessary to achieve the restoration project; ed. There will be a net environmental benefit from the restoration project with the reduced expanded buffer; de. Granting the proposed relief is consistent with the objectives of the critical area restoration project and consistent with purposes of the City's critical area regulations. 10. ECDC 23.40.040.0 - Areas subject to the provision of the CAO Existing Code: ECDC 23.40.040.0 is a subsections that addresses where the critical area regulations apply. ECDC 23.40.040.0 states: All areas within the city of Edmonds meeting the definition of one or more critical areas, regardless of any formal identification, are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this title. (Exhibit 1, pg. 5) Potential Council Amendment: The proposed amendment would replace this section to refer to new appendices discussed in proposed Amendment 8 above if they are adopted. DitruSSinn- As noted in the discussion on Amendment 8 above, the critical areas maps are general in nature and not regulatory. It is cost prohibitive to identify and classify every single critical area in the City of Edmonds. The code provision as it currently exists in the code notes that the critical regulations apply regardless of any formal identification. ECDC 23.40.040.0 would ensure that critical areas are protected, even if a critical area was missed in the mapping of the City's critical areas. 12. ECDC 23.40.090.D - Minimum Report Contents Existing Code: Packet Pg. 356 7.2 ECDC 23.40.090.D (Exhibit 1, pg. 7) describes the minimum report contents for all critical area reports. Additional information is required in critical area reports for the specific critical areas which are detailed in the chapters for the specific critical areas. Potential Council Amendment: The proposed amendment would add a new subsection to ECDC 23.40.090.D requiring critical area reports to identify the location of all native and non-native vegetation of 6 inch dbh or larger. Discussion: Critical area reports typically show the location of trees and other vegetation given the current required report contents. ECDC 23.40.090.D.2.a requires a map "depicting critical areas, buffers, the development proposal, and any areas to be cleared" and ECDC 23.40.090.D.4 requires "Identification and characterization of all critical areas, wetlands, water bodies, shorelines, and buffers adjacent to the proposed project area." Additionally, the wetland and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas specific report requirements (ECDC 23.85.030 and ECDC 23.90.020) requires written assessment and maps of "vegetative, faunal, and hydrologic characteristics" among other report requirements. The proposed Amendment 12 will specifically require trees of 6 inch dbh or larger be shown on project plans. Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Draft Critical Area Regulations as presented at the December 15, 2015 Council Meeting Exhibit 2 - Draft Contingent Critical Area Review Procedure Exhibit 3 - Critical Area Contingent Review Example Exhibit 4 - Geological Hazardous Areas Map Exhibit 5 - Streams and Wetlands Map Exhibit 6 - Priority Habitat Areas Map Exhibit 7 - Draft FEMA FIRM Map for Edmonds Waterfront Exhibit 8 - March 15, 2016 Council Minutes Excerpt Packet Pg. 357 City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 7.2.a EDMONDS CITY CODE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Chapter 23.40 ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREAS GENERAL PROVISIONS Sections: Part I. Purpose and General Provisions 23.40.000 Purpose. 23.40.010 Authority. 23.40.020 Relationship to other regulations. 23.40.030 Severability. 23.40.040 Jurisdiction — Critical areas. 23.40.050 Protection of critical areas. Part II. Critical Areas Review Process 23.40.060 General requirements. 23.40.070 Critical areas preapplication consultation. 23.40.080 Notice of initial determination. 23.40.090 Critical areas report — Requirements. 23.40.100 Critical areas report— Modifications to requirements. 23.40.110 Mitigation requirements. 23.40.120 Mitigation sequencing. 23.40.130 Mitigation plan requirements. 23.40.140 Innovative mitigation. 23.40.150 Critical areas decision. 23.40.160 Review criteria. 23.40.170 Favorable critical areas decision. Page 1 of 92 Packet Pg. 358 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 d 23.40.180 Unfavorable critical areas decision. L 23.40.190 Completion of the critical areas review. 0 m L 23.40.200 Appeals. Q 23.40.210 Variances. v T 23.40.215 Critical Area Restoration Projects T Part I1I. Allowed Activities, Exemptions and Noncompliance Penalties c 23.40.220 Allowed activities. 23.40.230 Exemptions. 23.40.240 Unauthorized critical areas alterations and enforcement. Part IV. General Critical Areas Protective Measures 23.40.250 Critical areas markers and signs. 23.40.270 Critical areas tracts. 23.40.280 Building setbacks. 23.40.290 Bonds to ensure mitigation, maintenance, and monitoring. 23.40.300 Critical areas inspections. Part V. Incorporation of Best Available Science 23.40.310 Best available science. Part VI. Definitions 23.40.320 Definitions pertaining to critical areas. Part 1. Purpose and General Provisions 23.40.000 Purpose. A. The purpose of this title is to designate and classify ecologically sensitive and hazardous areas and to protect these areas and their functions and values, while also allowing for reasonable use of private property. Page 2 of 92 Packet Pg. 359 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 B. This title is to implement the goals, policies, guidelines, and requirements of the comprehensive plan and the Washington State Growth Management Act. C. The city of Edmonds finds that critical areas provide a variety of valuable and beneficial biological and physical functions that benefit Edmonds and its residents, and/or may pose a threat to human safety or to public and private property. The beneficial functions and values provided by critical areas include, but are not limited to, water quality protection and enhancement, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain v support, flood storage, conveyance and attenuation of flood waters, ground water recharge and discharge, erosion control, wave attenuation, protection from hazards, historical, archaeological, and aesthetic value protection, and recreation. These beneficial functions are not listed in order of priority. D. Goals. By limiting development and alteration of critical areas, this title seeks to: 1. Protect members of the public and public resources and facilities from injury, loss of life, or property damage due to landslides and steep slope failures, erosion, seismic events, or flooding; 2. Maintain healthy, functioning ecosystems through the protection of unique, fragile, and valuable elements of the environment, including ground and surface waters, wetlands, and fish and wildlife and their habitats, and to conserve the biodiversity of plant and animal species; 3. Direct activities not dependent on critical areas resources to less ecologically sensitive sites and mitigate unavoidable impacts to critical areas by regulating alterations in and adjacent to critical areas; and 4. Prevent cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water quality, wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat, and the overall net loss of wetlands, frequently flooded areas, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. E. The regulations of this title are intended to protect critical areas in accordance with the Growth Management Act and through the application of the best available science, as determined according to WAC 365-195-900 through 365-195-925 and RCW 36.70A.172, and in consultation with state and federal agencies and other qualified professionals. F. This title is to be administered with flexibility and attention to site -specific characteristics. It is not the intent of this title to make a parcel of property unusable by denying its owner reasonable economic use of the property nor to prevent the provision of public facilities and services necessary to support existing development. G. The city of Edmonds' enactment or enforcement of this title shall not be construed to benefit any individual person or group of persons other than the general public. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.010 Authority. A. As provided herein, the Edmonds development services director or his/her designee (hereafter referred to as "the director") is given the authority to interpret and apply, and the responsibility to enforce, this title to accomplish the stated purpose. Page 3 of 92 Packet Pg. 360 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 B. The director may withhold, condition, or deny development permits or activity approvals to ensure that the proposed action is consistent with this title. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.020 Relationship to other regulations. A. These critical areas regulations shall apply as an overlay and in addition to zoning, site development, stormwater management, building and other regulations adopted by the city of Edmonds. B. Any individual critical area adjoined or overlain by another type of critical area shall have the buffer T and meet the requirements that provide the most protection to the critical areas involved. When any provision of this title or any existing land use regulation conflicts with this title, that which provides more protection to the critical area shall apply. C. These critical areas regulations shall be coordinated with review conducted under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), as necessary and locally adopted. D. Compliance with the provisions of this title does not constitute compliance with other federal, state, and local regulations and permit requirements that may be required (for example, shoreline substantial development permits, Hydraulic Permit Act (HPA) permits, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits, and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permits). The applicant is responsible for complying with these requirements, apart from the process established in this title. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.030 Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this title or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be judged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such order or judgment shall be confined in its operation to the controversy in which it was rendered. The decision shall not affect or invalidate the remainder of any part thereof and to this end the provisions of each clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this law are hereby declared to be severable. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.040 Jurisdiction — Critical areas. A. The director shall regulate all uses, activities, and developments within, adjacent to, or likely to affect one or more critical areas, consistent with the best available science and the provisions herein. B. Critical areas regulated by this title include: 1. Wetlands as designated in Chapter 23.50 ECDC, Wetlands; 2. Critical aquifer recharge areas as designated in Chapter 23.60 ECDC, Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas; 3. Frequently flooded areas as designated in Chapter 23.70 ECDC, Frequently Flooded Areas; Page 4 of 92 Packet Pg. 361 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 4. Geologically hazardous areas as designated in Chapter 23.80 ECDC, Geologically Hazardous Areas; and 5. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas as designated in Chapter 23.90 ECDC, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. C. All areas within the city of Edmonds meeting the definition of one or more critical areas, regardless of any formal identification, are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this T title. T �r D. Areas Adjacent to Critical Areas Subject to Regulation. Areas adjacent to critical areas shall be considered to be within the jurisdiction of these requirements and regulations to support the intent of this title and ensure protection of the functions and values of critical areas. "Adjacent" shall mean any activity located: 1. On a site immediately adjoining a critical area; and 2. Areas located within 200 feet of a subject parcel containing a jurisdictional critical area. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.050 Protection of critical areas. 7 SHARE Any action taken pursuant to this title shall result in equivalent or greater functions and values of the critical areas associated with the proposed action, as determined by the best available science. All actions and developments shall be designed and constructed in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120, Mitigation sequencing, to avoid, minimize, and restore all adverse impacts. Applicants must first demonstrate an inability to avoid or reduce impacts before the use of actions to mitigate potential impacts will be allowed. No activity or use shall be allowed that results in a net loss of the functions or values of critical areas. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part II. Critical Areas Review Process 23.40.060 General requirements.9 SHARE A. As part of this review, the director shall: 1. Verify the information submitted by the applicant; 2. Evaluate the project area and vicinity for critical areas; 3. Determine whether the proposed project is likely to impact the functions or values of critical areas; and Page 5 of 92 Packet Pg. 362 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 4. Determine if the proposed project adequately assesses all impacts, avoids impacts, and/or mitigates impacts to the critical area associated with the project. B. If the proposed project is within, adjacent to, or is likely to impact a critical area, the director shall: 1. Require a critical areas report from the applicant that has been prepared by a qualified professional; 2. Review and evaluate the critical areas report; N 3. Determine whether the development proposal conforms to the purposes and performance standards of this title, including the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review criteria; c 4. Assess the potential impacts to the critical area and determine if they can be avoided or minimized; and 5. Determine if any mitigation proposed by the applicant is sufficient to protect the functions and values of the critical area and public health, safety, and welfare concerns consistent with the goals, purposes, objectives, and requirements of this title. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.070 Critical areas preapplication consultation.0 SHARE Any person preparing to submit an application for development or use of land that may be regulated by the provisions of this title may request a preapplication meeting with the director prior to submitting an application for development or other approval. At this meeting, the director shall discuss the requirements of this title; provide critical areas maps, scientific information, and other source materials; outline the review process; and work with the activity proponent to identify any potential concerns that might arise during the review process, in addition to discussing other permit procedures and requirements. All applicants, regardless of participation in a preapplication meeting, are held fully responsible for knowledge and disclosure of critical areas on, adjacent to, or associated with a subject parcel and full compliance with the specific provisions and goals, purposes, objectives, and requirements of this title. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.080 Notice of initial determination.0 SHARE A. If the director determines that no critical areas report is necessary, the director shall state this in the notice of application issued for the proposal. B. If the director determines that there are critical areas on the site that the proposed project is unlikely to impact and the project meets the requirements for and has been granted a waiver from the requirement to complete a critical areas report, this shall be stated in the notice of application for the proposal. A waiver may be granted if the director determines that all of the following reauirements will be met: 1. There will be no alteration of the critical area or buffer; 2. The development proposal will not affect the critical area in a manner contrary to the purpose, intent, and requirements of this Title. Page 6 of 92 Packet Pg. 363 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 C. If the director determines that critical areas may be affected by the proposal and a critical areas report is required, public notice of the application shall include a description of the critical area that might be affected and state that a critical areas report(s) is required. D. Critical areas determinations shall be considered valid for five vears from the date in which the `` determination was made; after such date the city shall require a new determination, or at minimum 2 documentation of a new assessment verifying the accuracy of the previous determination [Ord. 3527 v § 2, 2004]. N 23.40.090 Critical areas report — Requirements.O SHARE 77 A. Preparation by Qualified Professional. The applicant shall submit a critical areas report prepared by a qualified professional as defined herein. For wetlands, frequently flooded areas and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, an applicant may choose one of the qualified technical consultants on the city's approved list to prepare critical areas reports per the requirements of this title or may apply to utilize an alternative consultant. Critical areas studies and reports developed by an alternative consultant may be subject to independent review pursuant to subsection B of this section. the serviees of a qualified teehnieal eeastiltapA 4om the eity's approved list shall enter- into a thfee Paf�y contract between the applicant, the consultant and the eity. All costs associated with the critical areas study shall be borne by the applicant. B. Independent Review of Critical Areas Reports. Critical areas studies and reports on geologically hazardous areas and those developed by an applicant representative or consultant not as part of a three - party contract may, at the discretion of the director, be subject to independent review. This independent review shall be performed by a qualified technical consultant selected by the city with all costs borne by the applicant. The purpose of such independent review is to provide the city with objective technical assistance in evaluating the accuracy of submitted reports and/or the effects on critical areas which may be caused by a development proposal and to facilitate the decision -making process. The director may also have technical assistance provided by appropriate resource agency staff if such assistance is available in a timely manner. C. Best Available Science. The critical areas report shall use scientifically valid methods and studies in the analysis of critical areas data and field reconnaissance and reference the source of science used. The critical areas report shall evaluate the proposal and all probable impacts to critical areas in accordance with the provisions of this title. D. Minimum Report Contents. At a minimum, the report shall contain the following: 1. The name and contact information of the applicant, a description of the proposal, and identification of the permit requested; 2. A copy of the site plan for the development proposal including: a. A map to scale depicting critical areas, buffers, the development proposal, and any areas to be cleared; and Page 7 of 92 Packet Pg. 364 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 b. A description of the proposed storm water management plan for the development and consideration of impacts to drainage alterations; 3. The dates, names, and qualifications of the persons preparing the report and documentation of any fieldwork performed on the site; 4. Identification and characterization of all critical areas, wetlands, water bodies, shorelines, and buffers v adjacent to the proposed project area; N 5. A description of reasonable efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to ECDC 23.40.120, Mitigation sequencing, to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas; affdc 6. Report requirements specific to each critical area type as indicated in the corresponding chapters of this title. 7. A statement specifying the accuracy of the report and all assumptions made and relied upon; 8. A description of the methodologies used to conduct the critical areas study, including references; and 9. Plans for adequate mitigation, as needed to offset any critical areas impacts, in accordance with the Mitigation Plan Requirements in Section 23.40.130. E. Unless otherwise provided, a critical areas report may incorporate, be supplemented by or composed, in whole or in part, of any reports or studies required by other laws and regulations or previously prepared for and applicable to the development proposal site, as approved by the director. At the discretion of the director, reports previously compiled or submitted as part of a proposal for development may be used as a critical areas report to the extent that the requirements of this section and the report requirements for each specific critical area type are met. F. Critical areas reports shall be considered valid for five years; after such date the city shall determine whether a revision or additional assessment is necessary.[Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.100 Critical areas report — Modifications to requirements.O SHARE A. Limitations to Study Area. The director may limit the required geographic area of the critical areas report as appropriate if. 1. The applicant, with assistance from the city of Edmonds, cannot obtain permission to access properties adjacent to the project area; or 2. The proposed activity will affect only a limited part of the subject site. B. Modifications to Required Contents. The applicant may consult with the director prior to or during preparation of the critical areas report to obtain approval of modifications to the required contents of the report where, in the judgment of a qualified professional, more or less information is required to adequately address the potential critical area impacts and required mitigation. Page 8 of 92 Packet Pg. 365 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 C. Additional Information Requirements. The director may require additional information to be included in the critical areas report when determined to be necessary to the review of the proposed activity in accordance with this title. Additional information that may be required includes, but is not limited to: 1. Historical data, including original and subsequent mapping, aerial photographs, data compilations and summaries, and available reports and records relating to the site or past operations at the site; 2. Grading and drainage plans; and N 3. Information specific to the type, location, and nature of the critical area. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.110 Mitigation requirements.13 SHARE A. The applicant shall avoid all impacts that degrade the functions and values of critical areas. Unless otherwise provided in this title, if alteration to the critical area is unavoidable, all adverse impacts to or from critical areas and buffers resulting from a development proposal or alteration shall be mitigated using the best available science in accordance with an approved critical areas report and SEPA documents, so as to result in no net loss of critical area functions and values. B._ Mitigation shall be ;n kind and on site, when possible,asufficient to maintain or compensate for the functions and values of the impacted critical area and to prevent risk from a hazard posed by a critical area. C. Mitigation shall not be implemented until after the director has provided approval of a critical areas report that includes a mitigation plan. Mitigation shall be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the approved critical areas report. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.120 Mitigation sequencing.0 SHARE A. Applicants shall demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to critical areas. B. When an alteration to a critical area is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized, or compensated for in the following sequential order of preference: 1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; 2. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps, such as project redesign, relocation, or timing, to avoid or reduce impacts; 3. Rectifying the impact to wetlands, frequently flooded areas, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the historical conditions or the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project; Page 9 of 92 Packet Pg. 366 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 4. Minimizing or eliminating the hazard by restoring or stabilizing the hazard area through engineering or other methods; 5. Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; 6. Compensating for the impact to wetlands, frequently flooded areas, and fish and wildlife habitat v conservation areas by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and/or N 7. Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action when necessary. C. Mitigation for individual actions may include a combination of the above measures. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004] . 23.40.130 Mitigation plan requirements.0 SHARE When mitigation is required, the applicant shall submit for approval by the director a mitigation plan as part of the critical areas report. The mitigation plan shall include: A. Environmental Goals and Objectives. The mitigation plan shall include a written report identifying environmental goals and objectives of the compensation proposed and including: 1. A description of the anticipated impacts to the critical areas and the mitigating actions proposed and the purposes of the compensation measures, including the site selection criteria; identification of compensation goals; identification of resource functions; and dates for beginning and completion of site compensation construction activities. The goals and objectives shall be related to the functions and values of the impacted critical area; 2. A review of the best available science supporting the proposed mitigation; 3. An analysis of the likelihood of success of the compensation project; and 4. Specific mitigation plan and report requirements for each critical area type as indicated in this title. B. Performance Standards. The mitigation plan shall include measurable specific criteria for evaluating whether or not the goals and objectives of the mitigation project have been successfully attained and whether or not the requirements of this title have been met. C. Detailed Construction Plans. The mitigation plan shall include written specifications and descriptions of the mitigation proposed, such as: 1. The proposed construction sequence, timing, and duration; 2. Areas of proposed impacts on critical areas or buffers; 3. Grading and excavation details; Page 10 of 92 Packet Pg. 367 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 -34. Erosion and sediment control features; 45. A planting plan specifying plant species, quantities, locations, size, spacing, and density; and 56. Measures to protect and maintain plants until established. These written specifications shall be accompanied by detailed site diagrams, scaled cross -sectional drawings, topographic maps showing slope percentage and final grade elevations, and any other drawings appropriate to show construction techniques or anticipated final outcome. T �r D. Monitoring Program. The mitigation plan shall include a program for monitoring construction and for assessing a completed project. A protocol shall be included outlining the schedule for site monitoring (for example, monitoring shall occur in years one, three, and five after site construction), and how the monitoring data will be evaluated to determine if the performance standards are being met. A monitoring report shall be submitted as needed to document milestones, successes, problems, and contingency actions of the compensation project. The compensation project shall be monitored for a period necessary to establish that performance standards have been met, but not for a period less than tie -five 5 years without approval from the director. E. Contingency Plan. The mitigation plan shall include identification of potential courses of action and any corrective measures to be taken if monitoring or evaluation indicates project performance standards are not being met. F. Financial Guarantees. The mitigation plan shall include financial guarantees, as necessary, to ensure that the mitigation plan is fully implemented. Financial guarantees ensuring fulfillment of the compensation project, monitoring program, and any contingency measures shall be posted in accordance with ECDC 23.40.290, Bonds to ensure mitigation, maintenance, and monitoring. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.140 Innovative mitigation.o SHARE A. The city of Edmonds may encourage, facilitate, and approve innovative mitigation projects that are based on the best available science. Advance mitigation, in lieu fee programs, or mitigation banking are examples of alternative mitigation prejeet-, pI roaches allowed under the provisions of this section mitigation pFejeet toget if it is demonstrated that all of the following circumstances exist: 1. There are no reasonable onnortunities on --site or within the same sub -drainage basin. or 0000rtunities on -site or within the sub -drainage basin do not have a high likelihood of success based on a determination of the capacity of the site to compensate for the impacts. Considerations should include: anticipated replacement ratios for wetland mitigation, buffer conditions and proposed widths, available water to maintain anticipated hydro e�rphic classes of wetlands when restored, proposed flood storage capacity, and potential to mitigate fish and wildlife impacts (such as connectivitx2 Page 11 of 92 Packet Pg. 368 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 4-2. The off -site mitigation has a greater likelihood of providing equal or improved critical areas `` functions than the altered critical area, and there is a clear potential for success of the proposed 2 mitigation at the identified mitigation site. v 3. Off -site locations shall be in the same basin and within the City unless: T �r a. Established watershed goals for water quality, flood storage or conveyance, habitat, or other wetland c functions have been established by the City and strongly justify location of mitigation at another site; or b. Credits from an approved (State -certified) wetland mitigation bank are used as compensation, and the use of credits is consistent with the terms of the approved bank instrument; c. Fees are paid to an approved in -lieu fee program to compensate for the impacts. B. Develooment proposals impacting critical areas and/or associated buffers may contribute Davment towards an identified City of Edmonds mitigation project with approval from the director, provided that the mitigation approach meets all state and federal permit requirements, where required. Such miti ag tion actions shall be consistent with ECDC 23.40.140.A.1. and ECDC 23.40.140.A.2., and with all other applicable provisions of ECDC Chapters 23.50 and 23.90. BC. Conducting mitigation as part of a cooperative process provides for retention or an increase in the beneficial functions and values of critical areas within the Edmonds jurisdiction. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.150 Critical areas decision.0 SHARE The city of Edmonds development services director shall make a decision as to whether the proposed activity and mitigation, if any, is consistent with the provisions of this title. The decision shall be based on the criteria of ECDC 23.40.160, Review criteria, and shall affect and be incorporated within the larger project decision. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.160 Review criteria. — s"pRE A. Any alteration to a critical area, unless otherwise provided for in this title, shall be reviewed and approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on the proposal's ability to comply with all of the following criteria: 1. The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120, Mitigation sequencing; 2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site; Page 12 of 92 Packet Pg. 369 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest; 4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC 23.40.110, Mitigation requirements; 5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science and results in no net loss of critical area functions and values; and 6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. T �r B. The director may condition the proposed activity as necessary to mitigate impacts to critical areas and c to conform to the standards required by this title. Except as provided for by this title, any project that cannot adequately mitigate its impacts to critical areas in the sequencing order of preferences in ECDC 23.40.120 shall be denied. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.170 Favorable critical areas decision.0 SHARE If the director determines that the proposed activity meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review criteria, and complies with the applicable provisions of this title, the development services director shall prepare a written notice of decision for the applicant and identify any required conditions of approval as part of the larger project decision. The notice of decision and conditions of approval shall be included in the project file and be considered in the next phase of the city's review of the proposed activity in accordance with any other applicable codes or regulations. Any conditions of approval included in a notice of decision shall be attached to the underlying permit or approval. Any subsequent changes to the conditions of approval shall void the previous decision pending re -review of the proposal and conditions of approval previously set by the director. A favorable decision should not be construed as endorsement or approval of any underlying permit or approval. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.180 Unfavorable critical areas decision.0 SHARE If the director determines that a proposed activity is not exempt or does not adequately mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review criteria, and the provisions of this title, the director shall prepare a written decision for the applicant that includes findings of noncompliance. No proposed activity or permit shall be approved or issued if it is determined that the proposed activity does not adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or does not comply with the provisions of this title. Following notice of decision that the proposed activity does not meet the review criteria and/or does not comply with the applicable provisions of this title, the applicant may request consideration of a revised critical area report. If the revision is found to be substantial and relevant to the critical area review, the Page 13 of 92 Packet Pg. 370 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 director may reopen the critical area review and make a new decision based on the revised report. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.190 Completion of the critical areas review.` SHRRE The director's decision regarding critical areas pursuant to this title shall be final concurrent with the final project decision to approve, condition, or deny the development proposal or other activity involved. 0 [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. N T 23.40.200 Appeals.0 SHARE Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of this title may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any, for the permit or approval involved. [Ord. 3736 § 71, 2009; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.210 Variances.13 SHARE A. Variances from the standards of this title may be authorized through the process of hearing examiner review in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 20.85 ECDC only if an applicant demonstrates that one or more of the following two conditions exist: 1. The application of this title would prohibit a development proposal by a public agency or public utility. A public agency and utility exception may be granted as a variance i£ a. There is no other practical alternative to the proposed development with less impact on the critical areas; b. The application of this title would unreasonably restrict the ability to provide utility services to the public; c. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site; d. The proposal attempts to protect and mitigate impacts to the critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science; and e. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. 2. The application of this title would deny all reasonable economic use (see the definition of "reasonable economic use(s)" in ECDC 23.40.320) of the subject property. A reasonable use exception may be authorized as a variance only if an applicant demonstrates that: a. The application of this title would deny all reasonable economic use of a property or subject parcel; b. No other reasonable economic use of the property consistent with the underlying zoning and the city comprehensive plan has less impact on the critical area; Page 14 of 92 Packet Pg. 371 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 c. The proposed impact to the critical area is the minimum necessary to allow for reasonable economic use of the property; d. The inability of the applicant to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title or its predecessor; e. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the v development proposal site; N f. The proposal minimizes net loss of critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science; and c g. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. B. Specific Variance Criteria. A variance may be granted if the applicant demonstrates that the requested action conforms to all of the following specific criteria: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist that are peculiar to the land, the lot, or something inherent in the land, and that are not applicable to other lands in the same district; 2. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; 3. A literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of all reasonable economic uses and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and zone of the subject property under the terms of this title, and the variance requested is the minimum necessary to provide the applicant with such rights; 4. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this title to other lands, structures, or buildings under similar circumstances; 5. The granting of the variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of this title, and will not further degrade the functions or values of the associated critical areas or otherwise be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the subject property; and 6. The decision to grant the variance is based upon the best available science and gives special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fish habitat. C. Hearing Examiner Review. The city hearing examiner shall, as a Type III -A decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC), review variance applications and conduct a public hearing. The hearing examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny variance applications based on a proposal's ability to comply with general and specific variance criteria provided in subsections (A) and (B) of this section. Page 15 of 92 Packet Pg. 372 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 D. Conditions May Be Required. The director retains the right to prescribe such conditions and safeguards as are necessary to secure adequate protection of critical areas from adverse impacts, and to ensure conformity with this title for variances granted through hearing examiner review. E. Time Limit. The director shall prescribe a time limit within which the action for which the variance is `` required shall be begun, completed, or both. Failure to begin or complete such action within the 2 established time limit shall void the variance, unless the applicant files an application for an extension of v time before the expiration. An application for an extension of time shall be reviewed by the director as a Type II decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). T �r F. Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to bring forth evidence in support of a variance application and upon which any decision has to be made on the application. [Ord. 3783 § 15, 2010; Ord. 3775 § 15, 2010; Ord. 3736 §§ 72, 73, 2009; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.215 Critical Area Restoration Proiects A. When a critical area restoration project is proposed that is not required as mitigation for a development proposal, the City of Edmonds may grant relief from standard critical area buffer requirements if the restoration project involves: 1. The dayli_hgting of a stream, or 2. Creation or expansion of a wetland that would cause a landward expansion of the wetland and/or wetland buffer B. At the time a restoration project t is proposed, a buffer shall be established that will apply to the restoration project boundary. Restoration project buffers shall be established according to the following requirements: 1. For the purposes of this section, an expanded buffer is that portion of the stream or wetland buffer that extended landward as a result of the restoration project. 2. A buffer may be applied to the restored portion of the stream or wetland that is not less than 75% of the expanded buffer associated with the class of stream or category of wetland; or, 3. The project proponent may request a reduced buffer of between 50% and 75% of the expanded buffer associated with the class of stream or category of wetland. The following criteria will be used b. the City in reviewing _ the he request for a reduced buffer: a. The Director determines that applying a 75% expanded buffer would significantly limit the use of the property for existing or permitted uses, thus making the restoration project infeasible; b. The proposed expanded buffer relief is the minimum necessary to achieve the restoration project; c. There will be a net environmental benefit from the restoration project with the reduced expanded buffer; Page 16 of 92 Packet Pg. 373 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 d. Granting the proposed relief is consistent with the objectives of the critical area restoration project and consistent with purposes of the City's critical area regulations. Part III. Allowed Activities, Exemptions and Noncompliance Penalties 23.40.220 Allowed activities.0 SHARE A. Critical Area Report. Activities allowed under this title shall have been reviewed and permitted or approved by the city of Edmonds or other agency with jurisdiction, but do not require submittal of a T critical area report, unless such submittal was required previously for the underlying permit. The director may apply conditions to the underlying permit or approval to ensure that the allowed activity is consistent with the provisions of this title to protect critical areas. B. Required Use of Best Management Practices. All allowed activities shall be conducted using the best management practices that result in the least amount of impact to the critical areas. Best management practices shall be used for tree and vegetation protection, construction management, erosion and sedimentation control, water quality protection, and regulation of chemical applications. The city may observe or require independent inspection of the use of best management practices to ensure that the activity does not result in degradation to the critical area. Any incidental damage to, or alteration of, a critical area shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the responsible party's expense. C. Allowed Activities. The following activities are allowed: 1. Permit Requests Subsequent to Previous Critical Areas Review. Development permits and approvals that involve both discretionary land use approvals (such as subdivisions, rezones, or conditional use permits) and construction approvals (such as building permits) if all of the following conditions have been met: a. The provisions of this title have been previously addressed as part of another approval; b. There have been no material changes in the potential impact to the critical area or buffer since the prior review; c. The permit or approval has not expired or, if no expiration date, no more than five years have elapsed since the issuance of that permit or approval; d. There is no new information available that is applicable to any critical area review of the site or particular critical area; and de. Compliance with any standards or conditions placed upon the prior permit or approval has been achieved or secured.; 2. Modification to Structures Existing Outside of Critical Areas and/or Buffers. Structural modification of, addition to, or replacement of a legally constructed structure existing outside of a critical area or its buffer that does not further alter or increase the impact to the critical area or buffer and there is no increased risk to life or property as a result of the proposed modification or replacement; Page 17 of 92 Packet Pg. 374 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 3. Pet:. hied Ater tie Modifications to Existing Structures Existing Withi within Critical Areas and/or Buffers. Permitted alteratio Modification to a legally constructed structure existing within a critical area or buffer shall be allowed when the a'�modification:does not a. Does not increase the footprint of the structuredevelopment; and b. Does not increase the impact to the critical area or buffers and c. Does not increasethere ;s no increase risk to life or property as a result of the proposed modification or replacement_ ( Aadditions to legally constructed structures existing within a critical area or buffer that do increase the existing footprint of development shall be subject to and permitted in accordance with the development standards of the associated critical area type (see ECDC 23.50.040 and 23.90.040)). This provision shall be interpreted to supplement the provisions of the Edmonds Community Development Code relating to nonconforming structures in order to permit the full reconstruction of a legal nonconforming building within its footprint; 4. Development Proposals within Physically Separated and Functionally Isolated Stream or Wetland Buffers. Areas that are physically separated and functionally isolated from a stream or wetland due to existing, legally established roadways,paved trails twelve (12) feet or more in width, or other legally established structures or paved areas twelve (12) feet or more in width that occur between the area in Question and the stream or wetland may be considered physically separated and functionally isolated from the stream or wetland. Once determined by the director to be a physically separated and functionally isolated stream or wetland buffer, development proposals shall be allowed in these areas. The director may require a site assessment and functional analysis documentation byqualified professional to determine whether the buffer is functionally isolated. In determining whether an area is physically separated and functionally isolated from the adjacent stream or wetland, the director shall consider the hydrologic, _geologic, and/or biological habitat connection potential and the extent and permanence of the interruption. 45. Activities within the Improved Right -of -Way. Replacement, modification, installation, or construction of utility facilities, lines, pipes, mains, equipment, or appurtenances, when such facilities are located within the improved portion of the public right-of-way or a city -authorized private roadway, except those activities that alter a wetland or watercourse. such as culverts or bridges. or result in the transport of sediment or increased stormwater. -56. Minor Utility Projects. Utility projects that have minor or short -duration impacts to critical areas, as determined by the director in accordance with the criteria below, and which do not significantly impact the function or values of a critical area(s); provided, that such projects are constructed with best management practices and additional restoration measures are provided. Minor activities shall not result in the transport of sediment or increased storm water. Such allowed minor utility projects shall meet the following criteria: a. There is no practical alternative to the proposed activity with less impact on critical areas; Page 18 of 92 Packet Pg. 375 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 b. The activity involves the placement of utility pole(s), street sign(s), anchor(s), or vault(s) or other small component(s) of a utility facility; and c. The activity involves disturbance of an area less than 75 square feet; 6. Public and Private Pedestrian Trails. New public and private pedestrian trails subject to the following: a. The trail surface shall be limited to pervious surfaces and meet all other requirements, including water quality standards set forth in the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19; b. Critical area and/or buffer widths shall be increased, where possible, equal to the width of the trail corridor, including disturbed areas; and c. Trails proposed to be located in landslide or erosion hazard areas shall be constructed in a manner that does not increase the risk of landslide or erosion and in accordance with an approved geotechnical report; and d. Trails located only in the outer twenty-five percent 25%) of critical areas buffers, and located to avoid removal of significant trees. Where existing legally established development has reduced the width of the critical areas buffer, trails may be placed in the outer twenty-five percent 25%) of the remaining critical area buffer. The trail shall be no more than five (5) feet in width and for pedestrian use only. Raised boardwalks utilizing nontreated pilings may be acceptable. Allowances for trails within the inner seventy percent (75%) of critical areas buffers are provided within applicable sections of ECDC Chapters 23.50 — 23.90. 7. Select Vegetation Removal Activities. The following vegetation removal activities: a. The removal of the following vegetation with hand labor and Egl#-hand-held equipment when the area of work is under one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet in area as calculated cumulatively over three 3 years: i. Invasive and noxious weeds; ii. English ivy (Hedera helix); iii. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, R. procerus); iv. Evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus); v. Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius); and vi. Hedge and field bindweed (Convolvulus sepium and C. arvensis); Page 19 of 92 Packet Pg. 376 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Removal of these invasive and noxious plant species shall be restricted to hand removal unless permits or approval from the appropriate regulatory agencies have been obtained for approved biological or chemical treatments or other removal techniques. All removed plant material shall be taken away from the site and appropriately disposed of. Plants that appear on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list of noxious weeds must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to that species. b. The removal of trees from critical areas and buffers that are hazardous, posing a threat to public safety, or posing an imminent risk of damage to private property; provided, that: T �r i. The applicant submits a report from an ISA- or ASCA-certified arborist or registered landscape architect that documents the hazard and provides a replanting schedule for the replacement trees; ii. Tree cutting shall be limited to pruning and crown thinning, unless otherwise justified by a qualified professional. Where pruning or crown thinning is not sufficient to address the hazard, trees should be removed or converted to wildlife snags; iii. All vegetation cut (tree stems, branches, etc.) shall be left within the critical area or buffer unless removal is warranted due to the potential for disease or pest transmittal to other healthy vegetation or unless removal is warranted to improve slope stability; iv. The land owner shall replace any trees that are removed with new trees at a ratio of two replacement trees for each tree removed (two within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan. Replacement trees may be planted at a different, nearby location if it can be determined that planting in the same location would create a new hazard or potentially damage the critical area. Replacement trees shall be species that are native and indigenous to the site and a minimum of one inch in diameter at breast height (dbh) for deciduous trees and a minimum of six feet in height for evergreen trees as measured from the top of the root ball; v. If a tree to be removed provides critical habitat, such as an eagle perch, a qualified wildlife biologist shall be consulted to determine timing and methods of removal that will minimize impacts; and vi. Hazard trees determined to pose an imminent threat or danger to public health or safety, to public or private property, or of serious environmental degradation may be removed or pruned by the land owner prior to receiving written approval from the city; provided, that within 14 days following such action, the land owner shall submit a restoration plan that demonstrates compliance with the provisions of this title; c. Measures to control a fire or halt the spread of disease or damaging insects consistent with the State Forest Practices Act, Chapter 76.09 RCW; provided, that the removed vegetation shall be replaced in kind or with similar native species within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan; d. Chemical Applications. The application of herbicides, pesticides, organic or mineral -derived fertilizers, or other hazardous substances, if necessary, as gpproved by the City, provided that their use shall be restricted in accordance with state Department of Fish and Wildlife Management Page 20 of 92 Packet Pg. 377 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Recommendations and the regulations of the state Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Department of Ecology; and de. Unless otherwise provided, or as a necessary part of an approved alteration, removal of any vegetation or woody debris from a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or wetland shall be prohibited; 8. Minor Site Investigative Work. Work necessary for land use submittals, such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests, and other related activities, where such activities do not require construction of new roads or significant amounts of excavation. In every case, impacts to the critical area shall be minimized and disturbed areas shall be immediately restored; and c 9. Navigational Aids and Boundary Markers. Construction or modification of navigational aids and boundary markers. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.230 Exemptions.0 SHARE A. Exemption Request and Review Process. The proponent of the activity may submit a written request for exemption to the director that describes the activity and states the exemption listed in this section that applies. The director shall review the exemption request to verify that it complies with this title and approve or deny the exemption. If the exemption is approved, it shall be placed on file with the city of Edmonds. If the exemption is denied, the proponent may continue in the review process and shall be subject to the requirements of this title. B. Exempt Activities and Impacts to Critical Areas. All exempted activities shall use reasonable methods to avoid potential impacts to critical areas. To be exempt from this title does not give permission to degrade a critical area or ignore risk from natural hazards. Any incidental damage to, or alteration of, a critical area that is not a necessary outcome of the exempted activity shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the responsible party's expense. C. Exempt Activities. The following developments, activities, and associated uses shall be exempt from the provisions of this title; provided, that they are otherwise consistent with the provisions of other local, state, and federal laws and requirements: 1. Emergencies. Those activities necessary to prevent an immediate threat to public health, safety, or welfare, or that pose an immediate risk of damage to private property and that require remedial or preventative action in a time frame too short to allow for compliance with the requirements of this title. Emergency actions that create an impact to a critical area or its buffer shall use reasonable methods to address the emergency; in addition, they must have the least possible impact to the critical area or its buffer. The person or agency undertaking such action shall notify the director within one working day following commencement of the emergency activity. Within 30 days, the director shall determine if the action taken was within the scope of the emergency actions allowed in this subsection. If the director determines that the action taken, or any part of the action taken, was beyond the scope of an allowed Page 21 of 92 Packet Pg. 378 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 emergency action, then enforcement provisions of ECDC 23.40.240, Unauthorized critical area alterations and enforcement, shall apply. After the emergency, the person or agency undertaking the action shall fully fund and conduct necessary restoration and/or mitigation for any impacts to the critical area and buffers resulting from theRi Q emergency action in accordance with an approved critical areas report and mitigation plan. The person 2 or agency undertaking the action shall apply for review, and the alteration, critical area report, and v mitigation plan shall be reviewed by the director in accordance with the review procedures contained herein. Restoration and/or mitigation activities must be initiated within one year of the date of the emergency and completed in a timely manner; 2. Operation, Maintenance, or Repair. Operation, maintenance, or repair of existing structures, infrastructure improvements, utilities, public or private roads, dikes, levees, or drainage systems that do not require construction permits, if the activity does not further alter or increase the impact to, or encroach further within, the critical area or buffer and there is no increased risk to life or property as a result of the proposed operation, maintenance, or repair. Operation and maintenance also includes normal maintenance of veizetation performed in accordance with best management practices. provided that such management actions are part of regular and ongoing maintenance, do not expand further into the critical area. are not the result of an expansion of the structure or utilitv. and do not directly impact an endangered or threatened species; and 3. Passive Outdoor Activities. Recreation, education, and scientific research activities that do not degrade the critical area, including fishing, hiking, and bird watching. Trails must be constructed pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(6), Public and Private Pedestrian Trails. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.240 Unauthorized critical area alterations and enforcement.0 SHARE A. When a critical area or its buffer has been altered in violation of this title or the provisions of Chapter 7.200 ECC, all ongoing development work shall stop and the critical area shall be restored. The director shall have the authority to issue a stop work order to cease all ongoing development work, and order restoration, rehabilitation, or replacement measures at the owner's or other responsible party's expense to compensate for violation of the provisions of this title. The director may also require an applicant or property owner to take immediate action to ensure site stabilization and/or erosion control as needed. B. Requirement for Restoration Plan. All development work shall remain stopped until a restoration plan is prepared and approved by the director. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional using the best available science and shall describe how the actions proposed meet the minimum requirements described in subsection C of this section. The director shall, at the violator's expense, seek expert advice in determining the adequacy of the plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant or violator for revision and resubmittal. C. Minimum Performance Standards for Restoration. 1. For alterations to frequently flooded areas, wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, the following minimum performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a critical area; Page 22 of 92 Packet Pg. 379 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 provided, that if the violator can demonstrate that greater functional and habitat values can be obtained, these standards may be modified: a. The historic structural and functional values shall be restored, including water quality and habitat functions; b. The historic soil types and configuration shall be replicated; c. The critical area and buffers shall be replanted with native vegetation that replicates the vegetation historically found on the site in species types, sizes, and densities. The historic functions and values should be replicated at the location of the alteration; and c d. Information demonstrating compliance with the requirements in ECDC 23.40.130, Mitigation plan requirements, shall be submitted to the city planning division. 2. For alterations to flood and geological hazards, the following minimum performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a critical area; provided, that if the violator can demonstrate that greater safety can be obtained, these standards may be modified: a. The hazard shall be reduced to a level equal to, or less than, the predevelopment hazard; b. Any risk of personal injury resulting from the alteration shall be eliminated or minimized; and c. The hazard area and buffers shall be replanted with native vegetation sufficient to minimize the hazard. D. Site Investigations. The director is authorized to make site inspections and take such actions as are necessary to enforce this title. The director shall present proper credentials and make a reasonable effort to contact any property owner before entering onto private property. E. Penalties. Any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity convicted of violating any of the provisions of this title shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties not to exceed a square footage cost of three dollars ($3.00) per square foot of impacted critical area and critical area buffer and/or a per tree penalty consistent with ECDC 18.45.070B. and C. _set forth in ECDC ' 8.45.(1�ndT Any development carried out contrary to the provisions of this title shall constitute a public nuisance and may be enjoined as provided by the statutes of the state of Washington. The city of Edmonds may levy civil penalties against any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity for violation of any of the provisions of this title. The civil penalty shall be assessed as proscribed in ECDC 18.45.070 and 18.45.075.[Ord. 3828 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part IV. General Critical Areas Protective Measures 23.40.250 Critical areas markers and signs.0 SHARE Page 23 of 92 Packet Pg. 380 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 A. The boundary at the outer edge of a critical area, critical area buffer or critical area tract may, at the discretion of the director, be required to be delineated with wood fencing. B. The boundary at the outer edge of the critical area or buffer may be identified with temporary signs prior to any site alteration. Such temporary signs may be replaced with permanent signs prior to occupancy or use of the site. C. These provisions may be modified by the director as necessary to ensure protection of sensitive features or wildlife needs. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. T �r 23.40.270 Critical areas tracts and easementsA s"RRE A. At the discretion of the director, critical areas tracts and/or easements may be required in development proposals for stibd visi ns, shei4 subdivisions, and planned developments that include critical areas. These critical areas tracts and/or easements shall delineate and protect those contiguous critical areas and buffers greater than 5,000 square feet including: 1. Landslide hazard areas and buffers; 2. Wetlands and buffers; 3. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas; and 4. Other lands to be protected from alterations as conditioned by project approval. B. Notice on Title. The owner of any property with field -verified presence of critical areas and/or critical areas buffers, except critical aquifer recharge areas, for which a permit application is submitted shall, as a condition of permit issuance, record a notice of the existence of such critical area and/or critical area buffer against the property with the Snohomish County Auditor's office. The notice shall be approved by the director and the city attorney for compliance with this provision. The titleholder will have the right to challenge this notice and to have it released if the critical area designation no longer applies; however, the titleholder shall be responsible for completing a critical areas report, subject to approval by the director, before the notice on title can be released. Critical areas 4aets shall be reeoraoa on all a,,,.,,,. ents of fr-ee,.,.a for- all affeeted lots. C. Critical areas tracts or easements shall be designated on the face of the plat or recorded drawing in a format approved by the director. The designation shall include the following restrictions: 1. An assurance that native vegetation will be preserved for the purpose of preventing harm to property and the environment, including, but not limited to, controlling surface water runoff and erosion, maintaining slope stability, buffering, and protecting plants, fish, and animal habitat; and 2. The right of the director to enforce the terms of the restriction. D. The director may require that critical areas tracts be dedicated to the city, to be held in an undivided interest by each owner of a building lot within the development with the ownership interest passing with Page 24 of 92 Packet Pg. 381 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 the ownership of the lot, or held by an incorporated homeowner's association or other legal entity (such as a land trust), which ensures the ownership, maintenance, and protection of the tract and contains a process to assess costs associated therewith. E. The use of herbicides within critical areas tracts or easements is prohibited except use of aquatic 1-4 approved herbicides where recommended by the Noxious Weed Control Board and where otherwise 2 consistent with the provisions of ECDC Title 23. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. v 23.40.280 Building setbacks.C3 sH11RE T �r Unless other -wise Except for geologically hazardous areas where setbacks are determined by a geotechnical report, buildings and other structures shall be set back a distance of 15 feet from the edges of all critical area buffers or from the edges of all critical areas, if no buffers are required. Th-e-In addition to other allowances provided by this Title, the following may be allowed in the building setback area: A. Landscaping; B. Uncovered decks; C. Building overhangs, if such overhangs do not extend more than 30 inches into the setback area; and D. Impervious ground surfaces, such as driveways and patios; provided, that such improvements may be subject to water quality regulations as adopted in the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.290 Bonds to ensure mitigation, maintenance, and monitoring.0 SHARE A. When mitigation required pursuant to a development proposal is not completed prior to final permit approval, such as final plat approval or final building inspection, the applicant shall be required to post a performance bond or other security in a form and amount deemed acceptable by the director. If the development proposal is subject to mitigation, the applicant shall post a mitigation bond or other security in a form and amount deemed acceptable by the city to ensure mitigation is fully functional. B. The bond shall be in the amount of 120 percent of the estimated cost of the uncompleted actions or the estimated cost of restoring the functions and values of the critical area that are at risk, whichever is greater. The amount of the performance bond shall include a reasonable allocation for inflation based on the length of anticipated delay and the provisions of subsection D of this section. C. The bond shall be in the form of a surety bond, performance bond, and/or maintenance bond from an acceptable financial institution, with terms and conditions acceptable to the city of Edmonds' attorney. D. Bonds or other security authorized by this section shall remain in effect until the director determines, in writing, that the standards bonded for have been met. Bonds or other security shall be held by the city for a minimum of twee -five 5 years to ensure that the required mitigation has been fully implemented and demonstrated to function, and may be held for longer periods when necessary to achieve these goals. Page 25 of 92 Packet Pg. 382 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 E. Depletion, failure, or collection of bond funds shall not discharge the obligation of an applicant or violator to complete required mitigation, maintenance, monitoring, or restoration. F. Public development proposals shall be relieved from having to comply with the bonding requirements of this section if public funds have previously been committed for mitigation, maintenance, monitoring, or restoration. G. Any failure to satisfy critical area requirements established by law or condition including, but not limited to, the failure to provide a monitoring report within Ithirty �30) days after it is due or comply with CM other provisions of an approved mitigation plan shall constitute a default, and the city may demand payment of any financial guarantees or require other action authorized under this title or any other law. c H. Any funds recovered pursuant to this section shall be used to complete the required mitigation. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.40.300 Critical area inspections.0 SHARE Reasonable access to the site shall be provided to the city, state, and/or federal agency review staff for the purpose of inspections during any proposal review, restoration, emergency action, or monitoring period. Failure to provide access shall constitute grounds for issuance of a stop work order. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part V. Incorporation of Best Available Science 23.40.310 Best available science.0 SHARE A. Protect Functions and Values of Critical Areas with Special Consideration to Anadromous Fish. Critical areas reports and decisions to alter critical areas shall rely on the best available science to protect the functions and values of critical areas and must give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fish, such as salmon and bull trout, and their habitat, where applicable. B. Best Available Science to Be Consistent with Criteria. The best available science is that scientific information applicable to the critical area prepared by local, state, or federal natural resource agencies, a qualified scientific professional, or a team of qualified scientific professionals that is consistent with criteria established in WAC 365-195-900 through 365-195-925 and RCW 36.70A.172. C. Characteristics of a Valid Scientific Process. In the context of critical areas protection, a valid scientific process is one that produces reliable information useful in understanding the consequences of a local government's regulatory decisions, and in developing critical areas policies and development regulations that will be effective in protecting the functions and values of critical areas. To determine whether information received during the permit review process is reliable scientific information, the director shall determine whether the source of the information displays the characteristics of a valid scientific process. Such characteristics are as follows: Page 26 of 92 Packet Pg. 383 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 1. Peer Review. The information has been critically reviewed by other persons who are qualified scientific experts in that scientific discipline. The proponents of the information have addressed the criticism of the peer reviewers. Publication in a refereed scientific journal usually indicates that the information has been appropriately peer -reviewed; 2. Methods. The methods used to obtain the information are clearly stated and reproducible. The methods are standardized in the pertinent scientific discipline or, if not, the methods have been appropriately peer -reviewed to ensure their reliability and validity; N 3. Logical Conclusions and Reasonable Inferences. The conclusions presented are based on reasonable assumptions supported by other studies and consistent with the general theory underlying the c assumptions. The conclusions are logically and reasonably derived from the assumptions and supported by the data presented. Any gaps in information and inconsistencies with other pertinent scientific information are adequately explained; 4. Quantitative Analysis. The data have been analyzed using appropriate statistical or quantitative methods; 5. Context. The information is placed in proper context. The assumptions, analytical techniques, data, and conclusions are appropriately framed with respect to the prevailing body of pertinent scientific knowledge; and 6. References. The assumptions, analytical techniques, and conclusions are well referenced with citations to relevant, credible literature and other pertinent existing information. D. Nonscientific Information. Nonscientific information, such as anecdotal observations, non -expert opinion, and hearsay,may, supplement scientific information, but it is not an adequate substitute for valid and available scientific information. E. Absence of Valid Scientific Information. Where there is an absence of valid scientific information or incomplete scientific information relating to a critical area leading to uncertainty about the risk to critical area function of permitting an alteration of or impact to the critical area, the director shall: 1. Take a "precautionary or a no -risk approach" that strictly limits development and land use activities until the uncertainty is sufficiently resolved; and 2. Require application of an effective adaptive management program that relies on scientific methods to evaluate how well regulatory and nonregulatory actions protect the critical area. An adaptive management program is a formal and deliberate scientific approach to taking action and obtaining information in the face of uncertainty. An adaptive management program shall: a. Address funding for the research component of the adaptive management program; b. Change course based on the results and interpretation of new information that resolves uncertainties; and Page 27 of 92 Packet Pg. 384 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 c. Commit to the appropriate time frame and scale necessary to reliably evaluate regulatory and nonregulatory actions affecting protection of critical areas and anadromous fisheries. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004] . Part VI. Definitions 23.40.320 Definitions pertaining to critical areas.0 SHARE T For the purposes of this chapter and the chapters on the five specific critical area types (Chapters 23.50, T 23.60, 23.70, 23.80 and 23.90 ECDC) the following definitions shall apply: _ "Adjacent" means those areas activities located on --site immediately adjoining a critical area; or a distance equal to or less than two hundred and twenty five (225)-200 feet of a development proposal or subject parcel and those areas l,.eatea within 800 root f a ,i,,,.,,r. entea bald eagle rosy "Alteration" means any human -induced action which changes the existing condition of a critical area or its buffer. Alterations include, but are not limited to: grading; filling; dredging; draining; channelizing; cutting, pruning, limbing or topping, clearing, relocating or removing vegetation; applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous or toxic substance; discharging pollutants; paving, construction, application of gravel; modifying for surface water management purposes; or any other human activity that changes the existing landforms, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife or wildlife habitat value of critical areas. "Best management practices" means a system of practices and management measures that: 1. Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste, and toxics; 2. Control the movement of sediment and erosion caused by land alteration activities; 3. Minimize adverse impacts to surface and ground water quality, flow, and circulation patterns; and 4. Minimize adverse impacts to the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of critical areas "Buffer" means the designated area immediately next to and a part of a steep slope or landslide hazard area and which protects slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and landslide hazards reasonably necessary to minimize risks to persons or property; or a designated area immediately next to and part of a stream or wetland that is an integral part of the stream or wetland ecosystem. "Chapter" means those sections of this title sharing the same third and fourth digits. "City" means the city of Edmonds. "Class" or "wetland class" means descriptive categories of wetland vegetation communities within the wetlands taxonomic classification system of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Cowardin, et al., 1979). "Clearing" means the act of cutting and/or removing vegetation. This definition shall include grubbing vegetation and the use or application of herbicide. Page 28 of 92 Packet Pg. 385 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 "Compensation project" means an action(s) specifically designed to replace project -induced critical area or buffer losses. Compensation project design elements may include, but are not limited to: land acquisition procedures and detailed plans including functional value assessments, detailed landscaping designs, construction drawings, and monitoring and contingency plans. "Compensatory mitigation" means replacing project -induced losses or impacts to a critical area, and includes, but is not limited to, the following: T ccRester-ation » (V • T have lost T �r longer- tha4 been by 7 f or- eatastr-ephie events within an area that no m the f � definition n . etl an 21. "Creation" means actions performed to intentionally establish a wetland or steam at a site where it did not formerly exist. 2. "Re-establishment" means actions performed to restore processes and functions to an area that was formerly a critical area, where the former critical area was lost by past alterations and activities. 3. "Rehabilitation" means improving or repairingprocesses and functions to an area that is an existing critical area that is highly degraded because one or more environmental processes supporting the critical area have been disrupted. -4. "Enhancement" means actions performed to improve the condition of existing degraded wetlands critical area so that the functions they provide are of a higher quality; enhancement activities usually attempt to change plant communities within existing wetlands from non-native communities to native scrub -shrub or forested communities. 45. "Preservation" means actions taken to ensure the permanent protection of existing high -quality wetlands. "Creation" means a compensation project performed to intentionally establish a wetland or stream at a site where one did not formerly exist. "Critical areas" for the city of Edmonds means wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas as defined in Chapters 23.50, 23.60, 23.70, 23.80 and 23.90 ECDC, respectively. "Development proposal" means any activity relating to the use and/or development of land requiring a permit or approval from the city, including, but not limited to: commercial or residential building permit; binding site plan; conditional use permit; franchise; right-of-way permit; grading and clearing permit; mixed use approval; planned residential development; shoreline conditional use permit; shoreline substantial development permit; shoreline variance; short subdivision; special use permit; subdivision; flood hazard permit; unclassified use permit; utility and other use permit; variance; rezone; or any required permit or approval not expressly exempted by this title. "Director" means the city of Edmonds development services director or his/her designee. Page 29 of 92 Packet Pg. 386 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 "Division" means the planning division of the city of Edmonds development services department. "Enhancement" means an action taken to improve the condition and function of a critical area. In the case of wetland or stream, the term includes a compensation project performed to improve the conditions of an existing degraded wetland or stream to increase its functional value. "Erosion" means the process in which soil particles are mobilized and transported by natural agents such as wind, rain, frost action, or stream flow. N "Erosion Hazard Areas." See ECDC 23.80.020(A). "Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas." See Chapter 23.90 ECDC. "Floodplain" means the total area subject to inundation by a "100-year flood." "100-year flood" means a flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. "Footprint of Existing Development" or "Footprint of Development" means the area of a site that contains legally established: buildings; roads, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, walkways or other areas paved with concrete, asphalt or compacted gravel; outdoor swimming pools; and patios. "Frequently Flooded Areas." See Chapter 23.70 ECDC. "Functions" means the roles served by critical areas including, but not limited to: water quality protection and enhancement; fish and wildlife habitat; food chain support; flood storage, conveyance and attenuation; ground water recharge and discharge; erosion control; wave attenuation; aesthetic value protection; and recreation. These roles are not listed in order of priority. "Geologically Hazardous Areas." See Chapter 23.80 ECDC. "Geologist" means a person licensed as a geologist, engineering geologist, or hydrologist in the state of Washington who has eafned a degree in geology fFem an aeer-edited eel! . -sity and has at least. postgr-adtta4e study, r-esear-eh or- teaehing. The pr-aetieal ex-per-ienee shall inelude a4 least t4ee year - work in applied geology and landslide evaluation in close association with qualified, pr-aetieing geologists and geoteehnieal/eivil engineers. For geologically hazardous areas, an applicant may choose a geologist or engineering_geologist licensed in the State of Washington to assess the potential hazard. "Geotechnical engineer" means a practicing geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer in the state of Washington who has at least €ou five years of professional employment as a geotechnical engineer in responsible charge including experience with landslide evaluation. "Grading" means any one or a combination of excavating, filling, or disturbance of that portion of the soil profile which contains decaying organic matter. "Habitats of local importance" means areas that include a seasonal range or habitat element with which a given species has a primary association, and which, if altered may reduce the likelihood that the species Page 30 of 92 Packet Pg. 387 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 will maintain and reproduce over the long-term. These might include areas of high relative density or species richness, breeding habitat, winter range, and movement corridors. These might also include habitats that are of limited availability or high vulnerability to alterations such as cliffs, talus, and wetlands. In urban areas like the city of Edmonds, habitats of local importance include biodiversity areas L- and corridors, which are characterized by a framework of ecological components which provides the 70 physical conditions necessary for ecosystems and species populations to survive in a human -dominated v landscApe.-inelode a seasonal range or- habita4 element with whieh a givefl speeies ha assoeiationif N 7 7 7will � T ever- the lon temi. These fnight inelude afeas of high relative density or- speeies �r 7 habitat, bfeeding 7 and movement These might also inelude habitats tha4 afe of limited ailability or- high vulner-ability to }+ 7 stieh as 7 7 eeastal 7 7 C beds, and (See ECDC L1 "In lieu fee program" means a program which sells compensatory mitigation credits to permittees whose obligation to provide compensatory mitigation is then transferred to the in lieu pro_r�ponsor, a governmental or non-profit natural resource management entity "Landslide Hazard Areas." (See ECDC 23.80.020(B).) "Mitigation" means the use of any or all of the following actions, which are listed in descending order of preference: 1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; 2. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps such as project redesign, relocation, or timing to avoid or reduce impacts; 3. Rectifying the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and habitat conservation areas by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the historical conditions or the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project; 4. Minimizing or eliminating the hazard by restoring or stabilizing the hazard area through engineered or other methods; 5. Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; 6. Compensating for the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and habitat conservation areas by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and 7. Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action when necessary. Page 31 of 92 Packet Pg. 388 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 "Native vegetation" means vegetation comprised of plant species which are indigenous to the Puget Sound region and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. "Native vegetation" does not include noxious weeds as defined by the state of Washington or federal agencies. "Normal maintenance of vegetation" means removal of shrubs/non-woody vegetation and trees (less than 3-inch diameter at breast height) that occurs at least every other year. Maintenance also maX include tree topping that has been previously approved by the City in the past 5 years. "Noxious weeds" means any plant whie", when tabl she ,that is highly destructive, competitive or difficult to control by cultural or chemical practices, limited to those plants on the state noxious weed list contained in Chapter -e&-fttrt ,o, iste ;n Chapter 16-750 WAC. c "Planning staff' means those employed in the planning division of the city of Edmonds development services department. "Qualified critical areas consultant" or "qualified professional" means a person who has the qualifications specified below to conduct critical areas studies pursuant to this title, and to make recommendations for critical areas mitigation. For geologically hazardous areasFer- afeas of potential ge ' gie ""stab flit the qualified critical areas consultant shall be a geologist or geoto,.hniea or,.:�oo, engineering geologist licensed in the State of Washington to assess the potential hazard. If development is to take place within ageologically _ hazardous area, the qualified critical areas consultant develop mitigation plans and design shall be a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Washington and familiar with landslide and slope stability mitigation. _ For wetlands and streams, the qualified critical areas consultant shall be a specialist in botany, fisheries, wetland biology, and/or hydrology with a minimum of OA five years' field experience with wetlands and/or streams in the Pacific Northwest. Requirements defining a qualified critical areas consultant or qualified professional are contained within the chapter on each critical area type. "Reasonable economic use(s)" means the minimum use to which a property owner is entitled under applicable state and federal constitutional provisions in order to avoid a taking and/or violation of substantive due process. "Redeveloped land(s)" means those lands on which existing structures are demolished in their entirety to allow for new development. The director shall maintain discretion to determine if the demolition of a majority of existing structures or portions thereof constitute the re -development of a property or subject parcel. "Restoration" means the actions necessary to return a stream, wetland or other critical area to a state in which its stability, functions and values approach its unaltered state as closely as possible. For wetlands, restoration as compensatory mitigation may include re-establishment or rehabilitation. "Seismic Hazard Areas." (See ECDC 23.80.020(C).) "Species of local importance" means those species that are of local concern due to their population status, their sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or that are game (hunted) species. (See ECDC 23.90.010(A)(4).) Page 32 of 92 Packet Pg. 389 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 "Storm Water Management Manual" means the Stot:m Water- a.,,,.,,.o,..,o„t M.,t, a f the Aiget Seen Basin by the Washi &4 r State Department of Eeo gy (as included in stormwater manual specified in Chapter 18.30 ECDC). "Streams" means any area where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which demonstrates `` clear evidence, such as the sorting of sediments, of the passage of water. The channel or bed need not 2 contain water year-round. This definition is not meant to include irrigation ditches, canals, storm or v surface water runoff devices (drainage ditches) or other entirely artificial watercourses unless they are used by salmonids or used to convey streams naturally occurring prior to construction of such watercourse. Streams are further classified into Categories S, F, Np and Ns and fishbearing or nonfishbearing 1, 2 and 3. (See ECDC 23.90.010(A)(1).) c "Title" means all chapters of the city of Edmonds Development Code beginning with the digits 23. "Undeveloped land(s)" means land(s) on which manmade structures or land modifications (clearing, grading, etc.) do not exist. The director retains discretion to identify undeveloped land(s) in those instances where historical modifications and structures may have existed on a property or subject parcel in the past. "Wetland functions" means those natural processes performed by wetlands, such as facilitating food chain production; providing habitat for nesting, rearing and resting sites for aquatic, terrestrial or avian species; maintaining the availability and quality of water; acting as recharge and/or discharge areas for ground water aquifers; and moderating surface water and storm water flows. "Wetland mitigation bank" means a site where wetlands are restored, created, enhanced, or in exceptional circumstances, preserved expressly for the purpose of providing compensatory mitigation in advance of authorized impacts to similar resources. "Wetlands" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass -lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or highway. However, wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands if permitted by the city (WAC 365-190-030(22)). Wetlands are further classified into Categories 1, 2, 3 and 4. (See ECDC 23.50.010(B).) [Ord. 3952 § 1, 2013; Ord. 3931 § 2, 2013; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Page 33 of 92 Packet Pg. 390 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Chapter 23.50 WETLANDS Sections: Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping v 23.50.000 Wetlands compliance requirements flowchart. T �r 23.50.010 Designation, rating and mapping —Wetlands. c Part Il. Allowed Activities — Wetlands 23.50.020 Allowed activities — Wetlands. Part III. Additional Report Requirements — Wetlands 23.50.030 Special study and report requirements — Wetlands. Part IV. Development Standards — Wetlands 23.50.040 Development standards — Wetlands. 23.50.050 Mitigation requirements — Wetlands. 23.50.060 Performance standards — Subdivisions. Part V. City of Edmonds Wetland Field Data Form 23.50.070 Wetland field data form. Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping 23.50.000 Wetlands compliance requirements flowchart.0 SHARE See Figure 23.50.000 at the end of this chapter. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.50.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Wetlands.D SHARE A. Designating Wetlands. Wetlands are those areas, designated in accordance with the approved federal wetland delineation manual and analicable reizional suoblements as set forth in WAC 173-22-035 Washington State Wetland 1dent f;,.ation and Deiineatio,, Manual (1997), that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. All areas within the city of Edmonds meeting the wetland designation criteria i the ideat f:, atier ara Page 34 of 92 Packet Pg. 391 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Deli,ea4i .,, Manual, regardless of any formal identification, are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this title. B. Wetland Ratings. Wetlands shall be rated according to the Washington State Department of Ecology wetland rating system found in the 2014 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Q Washington doetimen4s OlLpgfp� AlLaS ingto„, Ecology Publications Nos. 14-06-02993 74 and nn 06 � OM). Thiese doeuments eontains- ci defining the following wetland rating e-atego.v:os.• Consistent with the wetland rating system criteria and parameters within this document, wetlands that are rated for ecological functions with highest point totals 23 points or higher) perform ecological functions associated with water flow, water quality an habitat at highest levels, whereas wetlands that are rated with lowest point totals (15 points or lower) c perform ecological functions at lowest levels. Wetlands that are rated with points between 16 and 22 points perform ecological functions at moderate to high levels. The City of Edmonds Wetland Rating Categories: a. Category 4-I Wetlands. Category 4-I wetlands are those that represent a unique or rare wetland type; are more sensitive to disturbance than most wetlands; are relatively undisturbed and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime; or provide a high level of function. The following types of wetlands are Category Lr eetoneor- more of the followinger-i i. Relatively undisturbed estuarine wetlands larger than ones acre; ii. Wetlands of high conservation value that are identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/MR; Pr-egr-am�DNR as high quality wedapids; iii. Bogs larger than e half acre--, iv. Wetlands with mature and old growth forests M.,tufe and old growth foreste 'vvefl larger than one (1) acre; v. Wetlands in coastal lagoons; vi. Wetlands that perform functions at high levels Wetlands ds that perform many functions well as indicated by a score of twenty-three (23�points or more based on functions on the city of Edmonds wetland field data rn.,,, b. Category III Wetlands. Category II wetlands are those that are difficult, though not impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions. The following types of wetlands are Category 2II wetlands i. Estuarine wetlands smaller than one acre, or disturbed estuarine wetlands larger than one acre; Page 35 of 92 Packet Pg. 392 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 iv. Wetlands with a moderately high level of functions as indicated by a score of 51 te-6920 to 22 points based on functions o the eity o4'Edmonds . ,edan f:^'a data fefm. c. Category - -III Wetlands. Category 3-III wetlands are wetlands with a moderate level of functions as indicated by a score of 3&16 to 5G-19 points based on v functions. N d. Category 4-IV Wetlands. Category 4-IV wetlands are those with the lowest levels of functions as indicated by scores below 3-0-16 points based on functions c fem. a All wetlands should be rated consistent with the 2014 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washinjzton using the 2014 Western Washington Rating Form. C. Date of Wetland Rating. Wetland rating categories shall be applied as the wetland exists on the date of adoption of the rating system by the local government, as the wetland naturally changes thereafter, or as the wetland changes in accordance with permitted activities. Wetland rating categories shall not change due to illegal modifications. D. Mapping. The approximate location and extent of wetlands are shown on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. In addition, the National Wetlands Inventory and Soil Maps produced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service may be useful in helping to identify potential wetland areas. The inventory and cited resources are to be used as a guide for the city of Edmonds, project applicants, and/or property owners, and may be continuously updated as new critical areas are identified. They are a reference and do not provide a final critical area designation. E. Delineation. The exact location of a wetland's boundary shall be determined through the performance of a field investigation by a qualified professional wetland scientist applying the approved federal wetland delineation manual and annlicable reizional sunnlementsWashi ete State Wetlara� 449-7). Wetland delineations are valid for five years; after such date the city shall determine whether a revision or additional assessment is necessary. F. Lake Ballinger. Lake Ballinger is designated on the U.S. National Wetlands Inventory as a lacustrine (lake) environment and should not be delineated as a wetland in its entirety. Lake fringe wetlands existing along the periphery of Lake Ballinger shall be identified according to specific criteria provided in 23.50.010. -the Washington State Wetlands 1dentifieation and Delineation Ma+mal (Eeolog -Pttblieatien No. 96 94, 1997) and updated guidanee provided in Washington State Wetlands Rating System �for- Weste�Washington Revised (E E6logy Publieu4io„ No. nn 06 025, 2�004) Consistent with guidance for delineating lake fringe wetlands provided in these resources, the existence of jurisdictional wetlands along Lake Ballinger shorelines shall be largely based upon the presence of persistent emergent vegetation in shoreline areas less than 6.6 feet in depth. Provisions for protection of Lake Page 36 of 92 Packet Pg. 393 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Ballinger shorelines not meeting criteria for jurisdictional wetlands are provided in the city of Edmonds shoreline master program. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part II. Allowed Activities — Wetlands 23.50.020 Allowed activities — Wetlands.0 SHARE The activities listed below are allowed in wetlands in addition to those activities listed in, and consistent with, the provisions established in ECDC 23.40.220, and do not require submission of a critical areas T report, except where such activities result in a loss to the functions and values of a wetland or wetland buffer. These activities include: A. Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, shellfish, and other wildlife that does not entail changing the structure or functions of the existing wetland. B. The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling of soil, planting of crops, chemical applications, or alteration of the wetland by changing existing topography, water conditions, or water sources. C. Drilling for utilities under a wetland; provided, that the drilling does not interrupt the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column. Specific studies by a hydrologist are necessary to determine whether the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column could be disturbed. D. Enhancement of a wetland through the removal of nonnative invasive species. Weeding shall be restricted to hand removal and weed material shall be removed from the site. Bare areas that remain after weed removal shall be revegetated with native shrubs and trees at natural densities. Some hand seeding may also be done over the bare areas with native herbs. Noxious weeds listed on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to that species. E. Permitted alteration to a legally constructed structure existing within a wetland or wetland buffer that does not increase the footprint of development or impervious surfacing or increase the impact to a wetland or wetland buffer. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part III. Additional Report Requirements — Wetlands 23.50.030 Special study and report requirements — Wetlands.0 SHARE A. Additional Requirements for Wetlands. In addition to the general critical areas report requirements of ECDC 23.40.090, critical areas reports for wetlands must meet the requirements of this section. Critical areas reports for two or more types of critical areas must meet the report requirements for each relevant type of critical area. Page 37 of 92 Packet Pg. 394 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 B. Critical areas report requirements for wetlands may be met in "stages" or through multiple reports. The typical sequence of potentially required reports that may in part or in combination fulfill the requirements of this section include: 1. Wetland reconnaissance report documenting the existence and general location of wetlands in the vicinity of a project area; 2. Wetland delineation report documenting the extent and boundary of a jurisdictional wetland per RCW 36.70A.175; and T �r 3. Wetland mitigation report documenting potential wetland impacts and mitigation measures designed to retain or increase the functions and values of a wetland in accordance with ECDC 23.50.050 and the general provisions of this title. C. A wetland critical areas report may include one or more of the above three report types, depending on the information required by the director and the extent of potential wetland impacts. The Edmonds development services director maintains the authority and discretion to determine which report(s) alone or combined are sufficient to meet the requirements outlined below and to waive report requirements based upon site conditions and the potential for project impacts. D. Preparation by a Qualified Professional. A critical area report for wetlands shall be prepared by a qualified professional who is a certified professional wetland scientist or a noncertified professional wetland scientist with a minimum of five years of experience in the field of wetland science and with experience preparing wetland reports. Pursuant to ECDC 23.40.090(A), applicants may choose one of the qualified technical consultants on the city's approved list in preparing critical areas reports for wetlands, or may utilize an alternative consultant. Critical areas studies and reports developed by an alternative consultant shall be subject to independent review pursuant to ECDC 23.40.090(B). E. Area Addressed in Critical Area Report. The following areas shall be addressed in a critical area report for wetlands: 1. The project area of the proposed activity; 2. All wetlands and recommended buffers within 200 feet of the project area; and 3. All shoreline areas, water features, floodplains, and other critical areas, and related buffers within 200 feet of the project area. The location and extent of wetlands and other critical areas existing outside of the project area or subject parcel boundary may be shown in approximation as practical and necessary to provide an assessment of potential project effects. F. Wetland Analysis. In addition to the minimum required contents of ECDC 23.40.090, Critical areas reports — Requirements, a critical areas report for wetlands shall contain an analysis of the wetlands, including the following site- and proposal -related information at a minimum: 1. A written assessment and accompanying maps of the wetlands and buffers within 200 feet of the project area, including the following information at a minimum: Page 38 of 92 Packet Pg. 395 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 a. Wetland delineation and required buffers; b. Existing wetland acreage; c. Wetland category; d. Vegetative, faunal, and hydrologic characteristics; v T e. Soil and substrate conditions; T f. Topographic elevations, at two -foot contours; and c g. A discussion of the water sources supplying the wetland and documentation of hydrologic regime (locations of inlet and outlet features, water depths throughout the wetland, and evidence of recharge or discharge, evidence of water depths throughout the year: drift lines, algal layers, moss lines, and sediment deposits). The location, extent and analyses of wetlands not contiguous with the subject parcel existing outside of the immediate project area may be described in approximation as practical and necessary to provide an assessment of potential project effects and hydrologic/ecological connectivity to on -site wetlands and other critical areas. 2. A discussion of measures, including avoidance, minimization, and mitigation, proposed to preserve existing wetlands and restore any wetlands that were degraded prior to the current proposed land use activity. 3. A habitat and native vegetation conservation strategy that addresses methods to protect and enhance on -site habitat and wetland functions. 4. Functional evaluation for the wetland and adjacent buffer using a local or state agency staff - recognized method and including the reference of the method and all data sheets. 5. Proposed mitigation, if needed, including a written assessment and accompanying maps of the mitigation area, including the following information at a minimum: a. Existing and proposed wetland acreage; b. Vegetative and faunal conditions; c. Surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions including an analysis of existing and future hydrologic regime and proposed hydrologic regime for enhanced, created, or restored mitigation areas; d. Relationship to the watershed and existing waterbodies; e. Soil and substrate conditions, topographic elevations; Page 39 of 92 Packet Pg. 396 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 f. Existing and proposed adjacent site conditions; g. Required wetland buffers; and h. Property ownership. 6. A scale map of the development proposal site and adjacent area. A discussion of ongoing v management practices that will protect wetlands after the project site has been developed, including T proposed monitoring and maintenance programs. T �r 7. A bond estimate for the installation (including site preparation, plant materials and installation, fertilizers, mulch, and stakes) and the proposed monitoring and maintenance work for the required number of years. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part IV. Development Standards — Wetlands 23.50.040 Development standards — Wetlands.0 SHARE A. Activities may only be permitted in a wetland buffer if the applicant can show that the proposed activity will not degrade the functions and functional performance of the wetland and other critical areas. B. Activities and uses shall be prohibited in wetlands and wetland buffers, except as provided for in this title. C. Category 4-I Wetlands. Activities and uses shall be prohibited from Category 47I wetlands, except as provided for in the public agency and utility exception, reasonable use exception, and variance sections of this title. D. Category III Wetlands. With respect to activities proposed in Category III wetlands, the following standards shall apply: 1. Water -dependent activities may be allowed where there are no practicable alternatives that would have a less adverse impact on the wetland, its buffers and other critical areas. 2. Where non -water -dependent activities are proposed, it shall be presumed that alternative locations are available, and activities and uses shall be prohibited, unless the applicant demonstrates that: a. The basic project purpose cannot be accomplished as proposed and successfully avoid, or result in less adverse impact on, a wetland on another site or sites in the general region; and b. All alternative designs of the project as proposed, such as a reduction in the size, scope, configuration, or density of the project, would not avoid or result in less of an adverse impact on a wetland or its buffer. Page 40 of 92 Packet Pg. 397 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 E. Category 34III and 44V Wetlands. Activities and uses that result in unavoidable and necessary impacts may be permitted in Category 3-III and 4IV wetlands and associated buffers in accordance with an approved critical areas report and mitigation plan. F. Wetland Buffers. 1. Standard Buffer Widths. The standard buffer widths in ECDC 23.50.040.F.1.d below have been v establish in accordance with best available science. The buffers are based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified wetland professional using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. a. The use of the standard buffer widths requires the implementation of the measures in ECDC 23.50.040.F.2, where applicable, to minimize the impacts of the adjacent land uses. b. If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in ECDC 23.50.040.F.2, than a thirty three (33%) increase in the width of all buffer is required. c_The standard buffer widths presume the existence of a relatively intact native vegetation community in the buffer zone adequate to protect the wetland functions and values at the time of the proposed activity. If the buffer is composed of nonnative vegetation, lawn, or bare ground, vegetation is inadequate, then, at the discretion of the director, the buffer width may be increased or an applicant may be required to either develop and implement a wetland buffer enhancement plan to maintain the standard width or widen the standard width to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided.{s-ee subseetion (F)(3) of this seetion). R.elluifedl standard wetiand bti�r-s, based on wetland eategofy, are as fe max F-919MMIFINMAMFORIM �rMITNTMAMMIEVm d. Standard Wetland Buffer Widths Table. Minimum Buffer Buffer Buffer Width Width Buffer Width Width Wetland Wetland (Wetland scores (Wetland Wetland Category scores 3-4 scores 5 scores 6-7 8-9 habitat habitat habitatpoints) habitat points) oints points) Page 41 of 92 Packet Pg. 398 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Category i. 75 ft 105 ft 165 ft 225 ft Based on total score Category I: Bogs and 190 ft 190 ft 190 ft 225 ft Wetlands of Hiah Conservation Value Category I: 75 ft 105 ft 165 ft 225 ft Forested Camay I. 150 ft 150 ft 150 ft 150 ft Estuarine Category 75 ft 105 ft 165 ft 225 ft Based on score Category III (allj 60 ft 105 ft 165 ft 165 ft Categoryall) 40 ft 40 ft 40 ft 40 ft 2. Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands. The standard wetland buffer widths in ECDC 23.50.040.F. Le assumes implementation of the following measures, where applicable to a specific proposal. Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts Lights Direct lights away from wetland Noise Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland • If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation plantings adjacent to noise source • immediately adjacent to the out wetland buffer Toxic runoff Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while Page 42 of 92 Packet Pg. 399 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts ensuring wetland is not dewatered • Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 feet of wetlands • Apply integrated pest management Stormwater runoff • Retrofit stormwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development • Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer • Use Low Impact Development techniques (per PSAT publication on LID techniques) Change in water regime • Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns Pets and human disturbance • Use privacy fencing OR plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement Dust • Use best management practices to control dust Disruption of corridors or • Maintain connections to offsite areas that are undisturbed Restore corridors or connections to offsite habitats by replanting Page 43 of 92 Packet Pg. 400 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts connections 2. Increased Wetland Buffer Widths. The director shall require increased buffer widths in accordance with the recommendations of an experienced, qualified professional wetland scientist and the best available science on a case -by -case basis when a larger buffer is necessary to protect wetland functions c and values based on site -specific characteristics. This determination shall be based on one or more of the following criteria: a. A larger buffer is needed to protect other critical areas; b. The buffer or adjacent uplands has a slope greater than 15 percent or is susceptible to erosion and standard erosion control measures will not prevent adverse impacts to the wetland; or c. The buffer area has minimal vegetative cover. In lieu of increasing the buffer width where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the wetland functions and values, development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan in accordance with subsection (F)(3) of this section may substitute. d. The wetland and/or buffer is occupied by a federally listed threatened or endangered species, a bald eagle nest, a ,great blue heron rookery, or a species of local importance; and it is determined by the director that an increased buffer width is necessary to protect the species. -53. Measurement of Wetland Buffers. All buffers shall be measured from the wetland boundary as surveyed in the field. The buffer for a wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for approved wetland alterations shall be the same as the buffer required for the category of the created, restored, or enhanced wetland. 64. Buffer Consistency. All mitigation sites shall have buffers consistent with the buffer requirements of this chapter. -5. Buffer Maintenance. Except as otherwise specified or allowed in accordance with this title. wetland buffers shall be retained in an undisturbed or enhanced condition. Removal of invasive nonnative weeds is required for the duration of the mitigation bond. G. Wetland Buffer Modifications and Uses 1. Where wetland or buffer alterations are permitted by the City of Edmonds, the applicant shall miti _ ante impacts to achieve no not loss of wetland acreage and functions consistent with ECDC 23.50.050 and other applicable provisions of this Title. Page 44 of 92 Packet Pg. 401 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 2. At the discretion of the Director, standard wetland buffers may be averaged or reduced when consistent with all criteria in ECDC 23.50.040.G. Wetland buffer averaging with enhancement shall be preferred over wetland buffer averaging with enhancement. Wetland buffer reduction shall only be approved by the director when buffer averaging cannot be accomplished on -site. 43. Wetland Buffer Width Averaging with Buffer Enhancement. The director may allow modification of a standard or r wetland buffer width in accordance with an approved critical areas report and the v best available science on a case -by -case basis by averaging buffer widths. Any allowance for averaging buffer widths shall only be granted concomitant to the development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan for areas of buffer degradation. Only those portions of a wetland buffer existing within the project area or subject parcel shall be considered the total standard or reduced buffer c for buffer averaging. Averaging of buffer widths may only be allowed where a qualified professional wetland scientist demonstrates that: a. The buffer averaging and enhancement plan provides evidence that wetland functions and values will be: i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation _ is generally intact; or ii. Increased through plan implantation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the functions and values of the wetland; a. It will not reduee the function and value of wetlands or associated ; b. The wetland contains variations in sensitivity due to existing physical characteristics or the character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or vegetation, and the wetland would benefit from a wider buffer in places and would not be adversely impacted by a narrower buffer in other places; c. The total area contained in the buffer area, or the total buffer area existing on a subject parcel for wetlands extending off -site, after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within a standard or reduced buffer; and d. The buffer width at any single location is not reduced to less than -50-seventy-f�percent 75 o of the standard or reduced buffer width. 34. Buffer Width Reductions Thfeugkthrouh Buffer Enhancement. At the discretion of the Edmonds development set-viees director, and only when buffer averaging cannot be accomplished on site, wetland buffer width reductions (or approval of standard buffer widths for wetlands where existing buffer conditions require increased buffer widths) may be granted concomitant to the development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan for Category 3-III and 4IV wetlands only. Approval of a wetland buffer enhancement plan shall, at the discretion of the director, allow for wetland buffer width reductions to no less than seventy-five -50 percent 75%o of the standard width; provided, that: a. The plan provides evidence that wetland functions and values will be: Page 45 of 92 Packet Pg. 402 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 i. Inncreased or retained through plan implementation to ^* least the level ^.idea by ^ standard buffer- or- through additional for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is generally intact, or ii. Increased through plan implantation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the functions and values of the wetland; b. The plan documents existing native plant densities and provides for increases in buffer native plant densities to no less than three feet on center for shrubs and eight feet on center for trees; T �r c. The plan requires monitoring and maintenance to ensure success in accordance with ECDC 23.40.130(D); and d. The plan specifically documents methodology and provides performance standards for assessing iner-eases in wetland btt r- ftinetioni g as relate including but not limited to: i. Water- quality „roteet e Percent vegetative cover; ii. Provision ofwildlife h.,b; ercent invasive species cover; iii. Maintenance of wetian hydr-oleg ,Species richness; and iv. Amount of large woody debris. i-�i - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - NO 8. Buffer Uses. The following uses may be permitted within a wetland buffer in accordance with the review procedures of this title; provided, they are not prohibited by any other applicable law and they are conducted in a manner so as to minimize impacts to the buffer and adjacent wetland: a. All activities allowed by ECDC 23.50.020 (Allowed activities — wetlands). b. Conservation and Restoration Activities. Conservation or restoration activities aimed at protecting the soil, water, vegetation, or wildlife. Page 46 of 92 Packet Pg. 403 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 bc. Passive Recreation. Passive recreation facilities designed and in accordance with an approved critical area report, including: i. Walkways and trails; provided, that those pathways are generally constructed with a surface that does not interfere with substrate permeability-, are generally located only in the outer twenty-fivepercent a (25%) of wetland buffers, and are located to avoid removal of significant trees. Where existing lega11X established development has reduced the width of the wetland buffer, trails may be placed in the outer v twenty-fivepercent (25%) of the remaining wetland buffer. The trail shall be no more than five (5 feet in width and for pedestrian use only.Raised boardwalks utilizing nontreated pilings may be acceptable_ The director may allow trails within the inner twenty-five percent (25%) of wetland buffers when required to provide access to wildlife viewing structures, fishing access areas, or connections to other c trail facilities; ii. Wildlife viewing structures; and iii. Fishing access areas down to the water's edge that shall be no larger than six feet. c. Storm Water Management Facilities. Storm water management facilities, limited to outfalls, pipes and conveyance systems, storm water dispersion outfalls and bioswales, may be allowed within the outer 25 percent of a standard or modified buffer for Category 3 or 4 wetlands only; provided, that: i. No other location is feasible; and ii. The location and function of such facilities will not degrade the functions or values of the wetland. iii. Storm water management facilities are not allowed in buffers of Category 1 or 2 wetlands. iv. Projects shall also comply with all applicable requirements in Chapter 18.30 ECDC, Stormwater Management, including Minimum Requirement #8, Wetland Protection. 4 H. Signs and Fencing of Wetlands. 1. Temporary Markers. The outer perimeter of the wetland or buffer and the limits of those areas to be disturbed pursuant to an approved permit or authorization shall be marked in the field in such a way as to ensure that no unauthorized intrusion will occur and is subject to inspection by the director prior to the commencement of permitted activities. The director may require the use of fencing to protect wetlands from disturbance and intrusion. Temporary marking shall be maintained throughout construction and shall not be removed until permanent signs, if required, are in place. 2. Permanent Signs. As a condition of any permit or authorization issued pursuant to this chapter, the director may require the applicant to install permanent signs along the boundary of a wetland or buffer a. Permanent signs shall be made of an enamel -coated metal face and attached to a metal post or another nontreated material of equal durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot or every 50 feet, whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity. The sign shall be worded as follows or with alternative language approved by the director: Page 47 of 92 Packet Pg. 404 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Protected Wetland Area Do Not Disturb Contact the City of Edmonds Regarding Uses and Restrictions b. The provisions of subsection (G)(2)(a) of this section may be modified as necessary to assure protection of sensitive features or wildlife. 3. Permanent Fencing. Permanent fencing shall be required at the outer edge of the critical area buffer under the following circumstances, provided that the director may waive this require: a. As part of any development proposal for single-family plats, single-family. s�plats, multifamily, mixed use, and commercial development where the director determines that such fencing is necessary to protect the functions of the critical area, provided that breaks in permanent fencing may be allowed for access to permitted buffer uses (ECDC 23.50.040.G.8); b. As part of development proposals for parks where the adjacent proposed use is active recreation and the director determines that such fencing is necessary to protect the functions of the critical area; c. When buffer averagingis s employ e�part of a development proposal; d. When buffer reductions are employed as part of a development proposal; or e. At the director's discretion to protect the values and functions of a critical area. FIL Additions to Structures Existing Within Wetlands and/or Wetland Buffers. 1_Additions to legally constructed structures existing within wetlands or wetland buffers that increase the footprint of development or impervious surfacing shall be permitted consistent with the development standards of this section, provided that a wetland and/or buffer enhancement plan is provided to mitigate for impacts consistent with this Title, and provided that all.. impacts from temporary disturbances within the critical area buffer shall be addressed through use of best management _ plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed alteration. Provisions for standard wetland buffers, buffer- r-eduEtienthrough encemen wetland buffer averaging with enhancement, and buffer reductions with enhancement require applicants to locate such additions in accordance with the following sequencing: -Ia. Outside of the standard wetland buffer; -3b. Outside of a wetland buffer averaged (with enhancement)ing per subsection (FG)(43) of this section; Page 48 of 92 Packet Pg. 405 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 -2c. Outside of a wetland buffer reduced wither enhancement) per subsection (EG)(-34) of this section; 4d. Outside of the inner twenty fiv 2-5 percent 25% of the standard wetland buffer width thr-ough the use of both buffer- r-eduetien a -ad bti�r- with no more than three hundred (300)square feet of v structure addition footprint within the inner fifty percent (50%) of the standard wetland buffer width, T provided that enhancement is provided at a minimum three -to -one (3:1) ratio (enhancement -to -impact); N T e. Outside of the inner twentv five percent (25%) of the standard wetland buffer width with no more than five hundred (500)square feet of new footprint within the inner fifty percent(50%) of the standard wetland buffer width, provided that enhancement is provided at a minimum five -to -one (5:1,) ratio (enhancement -to -impact), and that stormwater low impact development (LID) techniques and other measures are included as part of the wetland / buffer enhancement plan. 2. Where meeting wetland buffer enhancement reauirements reauired by H.1. of this section would result in enhancement that is separated from the critical area due to uncommon property ownership, alternative enhancement approaches may be approved by the director. Alternative approaches could include a vegetated rain garden that receives storm runoff, replacement of existing impervious surfaces with pervious materials, or other approaches that provide ecological benefits to the adjacent critical area. 3. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within wetlands or wetland buffers that cannot be accommodated in accordance with the above sequencing in H.1. of this section (i.e., additions proposed within a wetland or the inner 25 percent of a standard buffer width) may be permitted at the director's discretion as a variance subject to review by the city hearing examiner and the provisions of ECDC 23.40.210. J. Development Proposals within the Footprint of Existing Development. New development shall be allowed within the footprint of existingdevelopment evelopment occurring within a wetland buffer, provided that the following conditions are met: 1. The footprint of existingdevelopment evelopment was legally established, and is consistent with the definition provided in ECDC 23.40.320; 2. The proposed development within the footprint of existing development is sited as far away from the wetland edge as is feasible; 3. As part of the development proposal, opportunities to reduce the footprint of existing development evelopment are implemented where such reduction would increase the buffer width adjacent to the wetland and not represent an undue burden given the scale of the proposed development. 4. The proposed development includes enhancement to the adjacent wetland and associated buffer in order to improve functions degraded by previous development; Page 49 of 92 T Packet Pg. 406 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 5. Enhancement is provided as wetland or buffer enhancement for an equivalent area of the footprint of the newly proposed development within in the footprint of existingdevelopment evelopment occurring in wetland buffer, or through an alternative approach approved by the director that restores degraded functions of the wetland and remaining buffer; and 6. Impacts from temporary disturbances within the wetland buffer shall be addressed through use of best management plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed v alteration. N IK. Small, hydrologically _ isolated wetlandsE�s. The director may allow small, hydrolo _ ig ca11X isolated Category 3-III or IV4 wetlands under 5Wone thousand- 1 000 square feet in area to be exempt c from the avoidance sequencing, provisions of ECDC 23.40.120 and the wetland development standards provisions of ECDC 23.50.040.F. At the discretion of the director such wetlands may be altered. provided that pp-feevWens of this title. A wetland exemption shall granted i a submitted critical areas report and miti atg ion plan, �r *"� �� �r�*���' of delineation, provides o evidence that all of the following conditions are met: �? 1. The wetland is unless than Simone thousand (1,000) square feet in area; -32. The wetland does not provide significant habitat value for wildlife; aftd 3. The wetland is not adjacent to a riparian area; 4. The wetland has a score of three (3) — four (4) points for habitat in the adopted Western Washing rating system; and 5. A mitigation plan to replace lost wetland functions and values is developed, approved and implemented consistent with ECDC 23.50.050. rre!rr.��Tsssrssee!*: �!�rzt�:�stre�r�as� •2004]._ - 23.50.050 Mitigation requirements — Wetlands.P SHARE Compensatory mitigation for alterations to wetlands shall achieve equivalent or greater biologic functions. Wetland mitigation plans shall be consistent with Gguidelines fef-in Wetland Mitigation in Washington State —Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans (Ecologyy, 2006) and Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach (Ecology, 2009)Devele„ing Freshwater- Wetlands Mitigation Plans and sals, 1994, as revised. Page 50 of 92 Packet Pg. 407 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 ............ N environtnents. T T �r E A. Mitigation for Lost or Affected Functions. Compensatory mitigation actions shall address functions affected by the alteration to achieve functional equivalency or improvement and shall provide similar wetland functions as those lost, except when: 1. The lost wetland provides minimal functions as determined by a site -specific function assessment, and the proposed compensatory mitigation action(s) will provide equal or greater functions or will provide functions shown to be limiting within a watershed through a formal Washington State watershed assessment plan or protocol; or 2. Out -of -kind replacement will best meet formally identified watershed goals, such as replacement of historically diminished wetland types. GB. Preference of Mitigation Actions. Mitigation actions that require compensation by replacing, enhancing, or substitution shall occur in the following order of preference: 1. Implementing compensatory restoration through purchase of credits at an approved mitigation bank or through payment into an approved in lieu fee program. -12. Restoring (re-establishing) wetlands on upland sites that were formerly wetlands. -23. Creating wetlands on disturbed upland sites such as those with vegetative cover consisting primarily of nonnative, introduced species. This should only be attempted when there is a consistent source of hydrology and it can be shown that the surface and subsurface hydrologic regime is conducive for the wetland community that is being designed. 4. Enhancing significantly degraded wetlands in combination with restoration or creation. Such enhancement should be part of a mitigation package that includes replacing the impacted area meeting appropriate ratio requirements. D�C. Type and Location of Mitigation. Unless it is demonstrated that a higher level of ecological functioning would result from an alternate approach, compensatory mitigation for ecological functions shall be in -kind and conducted on the site or in the vicinity of the alteration except when all of the following apply: 1. On -site opportunities do not have a high likelihood of success, after a determination of the natural capacity of the site to mitigate for the impacts. Consideration should include: anticipated wetland Page 51 of 92 Packet Pg. 408 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 mitigation replacement ratios, buffer conditions and proposed widths, hydrogeomorphic classes of on - site wetlands when restored, proposed flood storage capacity, and potential to mitigate riparian fish and wildlife impacts (such as connectivity); 2. Off -site mitigation has a greater likelihood of providing equal or improved wetland functions than the impacted wetland; -and 3. Off -site mitigation incorporates guidance from Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory T Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington (Ecology Publication #10-06-011, Hruby. 2012), and T �r -34. Off -site locations for compensatory mitigation are consistent with city of Edmonds goals for rimwatershed-wide ecological restoration. Off -site locations are selected with a preference for sites within the same basin as the impact, followed by other sites within the city. -Specific areas targeted for restoration efforts include: a. Lake -fringe wetlands and habitat areas associated with Lake Ballinger; b. Edmonds marsh; c. Yost Park wetlands; d. Good Hope wetlands; and e. Wetlands and habitat areas peripheral to anadromous fish -bearing streams:; and f. Sites available through an approved mitigation bank or in --lieu fee program. m. This list is not comprehensive and may change as the city of Edmonds identifies areas suitable for restoration and capital improvement projects consistent with goals for jurisdiction -wide habitat retention and enhancement provided in the city's comprehensive plan. ED. Mitigation Timing. Mitigation projects shall be completed with an approved monitoring plan prior to activities that will disturb wetlands. In all other cases, mitigation shall be completed immediately following disturbance and prior to use or occupancy of the activity or development. Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing fisheries, wildlife, and flora. EE. Mitigation Ratios. 1. Acreage Replacement Ratios. The fellewing ratios in the table below shall apply to ere r-estor-atie or re-establishment, rehabilitation, or enhancement that is in -kind, is on -site, is the same eategor-y, is timed prior to or concurrent with alteration, and has a high probability of success. These ratios do not apply to remedial actions resulting from unauthorized alterations; greater ratios shall apply in those cases. The first number specifies the acreage of replacement wetlands and the second specifies the acreage of wetlands altered. Ratios for rehabilitation and enhancement may be reduced when combined with 1:1 replacement through creation or re-establishment pursuant to Table la, Wetland Mitigation in Washington State — Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance —Version 1, (Ecologyy Page 52 of 92 Packet Pg. 409 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Publication #06-06-1 la, or as revised). Creation, re-establishment, rehabilitation, and enhancement definitions are provided in ECDC 23.40.320 (see definition for "compensatory mitigation", and shall be additionally consistent with intent pursuant to Ecology Publication #06-06-1 la.: L T Category 3. two to N e. one-, T d.Category 4: one and one -half to one, C Category and Tyne of Wet/and Creation or Re - establishment Rehabilitation Enhancement only only Category IV 1.5:1 3:1 6:1 Category III 2:1 4:1 81 Category II 3:1 6:1 12:1 Category I: Based on functions 4:1 8:1 16:1 Category I: Mature and old growth forest 6:1 12:1 24:1 Category I: High conservation Not considered Not considered Not considered possible possible possible value / Boq Mitigation requirements may also be determined using the credit/debit tool described in Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington: Final Report (Ecology Publication #10-06-011, Olympia, WA, March 2012, or as revised) if gpproved by the director. 2. Off -site Mitigation. - These ratios provided in ECDC 23.50.050.F.1. do not apply to off -site mitigation, _ including4he use of credits from a state -certified wetland mitigation bank or payment to a certified in - lieu fee program. When off -site mitigation is proposed, or when ^redits from armed mitigation bank Page 53 of 92 Packet Pg. 410 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 or in lieu fee program isafe used, replacement ratios mayshettW incorporate guidance from Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington (Ecology Publication #10-06-011, Hruby. 2012), and for mitigation banks or in lieu fee program should be consistent with the certification requirements ef the bmk's eet4i fie fie . Use of mitigation banks shall meet all requirements of ECDC 23.50.050.H.The firs* number- oeifies the ae of r-eplaeemen -23. Increased Replacement Ratio. The director may require increased compensatory mitigation ratios under the following circumstances: T �r a. Uncertainty exists as to the probable success of the proposed restoration or creation; b. A significant period of time will elapse between impact and replication of wetland functions; c. Proposed mitigation will result in a lower -category wetland or reduced functions relative to the wetland being impacted; or d. The impact was an unauthorized impact. G. Wetlands Enhancement as Mitigation. 1. Impacts to wetland functions may be mitigated by enhancement of existing significantly degraded wetlands, but may, at the discretion of the director, be used in conjunction with restoration and/or creation. Applicants proposing to enhance wetlands must produce a critical areas report that identifies how enhancement will increase the functions of the degraded wetland and how this increase will adequately mitigate for the loss of wetland area and function at the impact site. An enhancement proposal must also show whether existing wetland functions will be reduced by the enhancement actions. 2. At a minimum, enhancement acreage shall be double the acreage required for creation or restoration under subsection F of this section. The ratios shall be greater than double the required acreage where the enhancement proposal would result in minimal gain in the performance of wetland functions and/or result in the reduction of other wetland functions currently being provided in the wetland. 3. Mitigation ratios for enhancement in combination with other forms of mitigation shall range from six - to -one to three -to -one and be limited to Class 3 and 4 wetlands. H. Wetland Mitigation Banks and In --Lieu Fee Programs. 1. Wetland Mitigation Banks. Credits from a wetland mitigation bank may be approved for use as compensation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands when: a. The bank is certified under state rules; b. The director determines that the wetland mitigation bank provides appropriate compensation for the authorized impacts; and Page 54 of 92 Packet Pg. 411 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 c. The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and conditions of the bank's certification instrument. d. Replacement ratios for projects using bank credits mare consistent with replacement ratios specified in the bank's certification. e. Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank are used to compensate for impacts located within v the service area specified in the certified bank instrument. In some cases, the service area of the bank may include portions of more than one adjacent drainage basin for specific wetland functions. T �r 32. In --Lieu Fee Programs. As an alternative to on -site or other off -site mitigat�pproaches, the director may previ 1egpprove purchase of credit for compensatory mitigation from an in lieu fee program. An.. such used to compensate for direct wetland impacts shall be developed and approved throu_hg_a public process and be consistent with federal rules, state policy on in lieu fee mitigation and state water quality regulations, Determiningcredit redit purchase necessary to compensate for wetland impacts shall incorporate guidance from Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington (Ecology Publication #10-06- 011, Hruby. 2012). Development proposals impacting critical areas and/or associated buffers maX contribute payment towards an identified City of Edmonds mitigation project with approval from the director, provided that the mitigation meets all state and federal permit requirements, where required. -applicant provision of funds to identified capital improvement projects for- wedan restoration. The dir-eetor- r-etains diser-etion to establish a monetary value for- applieant pr-ovision of ftinds whieh shall be, at a fiiiniffr&m, equal to the eest of designing, developing, implemeating and menit in kind ^ ^ ator-y mitigation on to ^ in the „ eet vieir4* Applicant provision of funds for compensatory mitigation shall only be approved if: a. The director determines that it would provide environmentally ppropriate compensation for the proposed wetland impacts; effo14S; b. The mitigation will occur on a site identified using the site selection and prioritization process in the approved in --lieu fee program instrument or at a City -identified restoration site consistent with ECDC23.40.140 with the pr-evisions and faties of this title; c. A restoration area and plan have been identified and shall be implemented within three years of project development; d. Restoration efforts are focused in those areas identified in subsection (T"«` of this section and areas identified as suitable for restoration by the director; and e. Credits from an approved in --lieu fee program may be used to compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in the approved in --lieu fee instrument. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Page 55 of 92 Packet Pg. 412 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 23.50.060 Performance standards — SubdivisionsA3 SHARE The subdivision and short subdivision of land in wetlands and associated buffers is subject to the following: A. Land that is located wholly within a wetland or its buffer may not be subdivided. B. Land that is located partially within a wetland or its buffer may be subdivided; provided, that an accessible and buildable contiguous portion of each new lot is located outside of the wetland and its T buffer. C. Access roads and utilities serving the proposed subdivision may be permitted within the wetland and associated buffers only at the discretion of the director. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part V. City of Edmonds Wetland Field Data Form 23.50.070 Wetland field data form.0 SHARE The eity ofEdmonds-wetland field data used for completion of wetland ratings shall be consistent with the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029• Hruby 2014).f fm is available in the eity of Edonds development serviees department and n the eity of T7rl,Y,onds . ,ebsite. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Figure 23.50.000 Page 56 of 92 Packet Pg. 413 City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 7.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS Critical Areas Compliance Requirements* Wetlands wetland nr?v Wetland Reconnais• Reconnaissance Wetland delineation buffer _:i Vin[with Impacts cannot bufferrAmai�mr uffer — belccated sanceREQuIRED ta detemInes that REQilIREStoidentify annar+.ntiand be avoided on or near determine ifpotential jurisdictional wetland bound aric �nt throughSubject Plan wetland meets ju risdic- wetland exist and classify teed a nd standard buffer o prove parcel- tlonaI criteria and is within 22.5 ft of per updated Increase located within 2254of subject parcel. categories. nctions subject parcel. es. Butter wiEih rM�ciien ihr gh,.ht t -p'y ard+ Wetland Buffer Recon n ai5sa nce identifies Wetland impacts are c��ningrarwap ihattcemcrrc Plan well an d is not j urisd fiction a l avendPd thfougn EQIIIREh top rove (and ju rlsd lttlon a l determl- standard buffer Mention or Inc rease nation is confirmed by the widths for wetiand in wetland functions; J,& Army Gor ps of category. a nd va lues. Engineers); or reconnais- sance identifies th at wetland Is located � 225It P Wetland Buffer from subjectparcel . No additional woe V m f"'' Mitigation Plan maaaron RE IRED Per Qv compliance J u pd a led ccd a req ui re- requ iremen ts, ment5 to prove retention or increase No additlonaI of wetland functions compliance :aod imlu�, l requirements. Nearing Examiner �-i—tsca Wto EQUOR Ea on ly for va ri a nees nie®�ue projects for wh[chimpacis n not be miligat�d to retain well and functions and Values - WPM rix1ii men[s may 13 r. MN thmueh suhmhslnn nla slnelend[ral area rPnnrt or midtlplo vve rts In nnmbinatlnn. Page 57 of 92 No additional compliance required. No additional compliance required. No additional compliance required. Packet Pg. 414 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Chapter 23.60 CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS Sections: Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping v 23.60.010 Critical aquifer recharge areas designation. T �r Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping c 23.60.010 Critical aquifer recharge areas designation.0 SHARE Critical aquifer recharge areas (CARAs) are those areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water as defined by WAC 365-190-030(2). CARAs have prevailing geologic conditions associated with infiltration rates that create a high potential for contamination of ground water resources or contribute significantly to the replenishment of ground water. CARAs are protected as critical areas under the Washington State Growth Management Act. However, no areas meeting criteria for CARAs exist in the vicinity of the city of Edmonds. Thus, additional specific provisions for protection of this critical area type are not provided within this title. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Page 58 of 92 Packet Pg. 415 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Chapter 23.70 FREQUENTLY FLOODED AREAS Sections: Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping v 23.70.010 Designation, rating and mapping —Frequently flooded areas. T �r Part IL Additional Report Requirements — Frequently Flooded Areas c 23.70.020 Special study and report requirements — Frequently flooded areas. 23.70.030 Warning and disclaimer of liability. Part III. Development Standards — Frequently Flooded Areas 23.70.040 Development standards — Frequently flooded areas. Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping 23.70.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Frequently flooded areas. SHRRE A. Frequently Flooded Areas. Frequently flooded areas shall include: 1. Those areas identified on FEMA flood insurance maps as areas of special flood hazard, which include those lands in the floodplain subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. For the purposes of this title, areas of special flood hazard for the city of Edmonds are hereby declared generally to be those areas shown as Zone A (including Zones A, AE, Al—A30, AH, AO, AR and A99) and Zone V (including Zones V and YE Ion the following FEMA maps or panels: 53061C00; 5306IC1292 E, Panel 1292; 53061C1285 E, Panel 1285; 5306IC1315 E, Panel 1315; and 5306IC1305 E, Panel 1305. The following maps and panels were revised and effeetive on jafmafy 30, 1999, and such inaps and panels are adepted by this referenee as a part of this ehapter as if ful1y-s-e4 f i*' n.The city will use the most currently adopted FEMA maps in determining whether a propertX is located within a frequently flooded area. Base flood elevations and flood hazard factors for those areas shown as Zone A on the map have not been determined and the local flood management administrator shall utilize such other data as may be reasonably available from federal, state or other sources in administering this chapter as provided in the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19. 2. Those areas identified as frequently flooded areas on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. Identified frequently flooded areas are consistent with and based upon designation of areas of special flood hazard on FEMA flood insurance maps as indicated above. Page 59 of 92 Packet Pg. 416 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 B. City Discretion and Designation. Flood insurance maps and the city's critical areas inventory are to be used as a guide for the city of Edmonds development services department, project applicants and/or property owners, and the public and should be considered a minimum designation of frequently flooded O areas. As flood insurance maps may be continuously updated as areas are reexamined or new areas are identified, newer and more restrictive information for flood hazard area identification shall be the basis Q for regulation. The city of Edmonds shall retain the right to designate and identify areas known to be 2 prone to flooding outside of the 100-year floodplain and subject them to the provisions and protections v of this title and the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. T �r Part II. Additional Report Requirements — Frequently Flooded Areas 23.70.020 Special study and report requirements — Frequently flooded areas. ""RE In addition to the general critical areas report requirements of ECDC 23.40.090, critical areas reports for frequently flooded areas must meet the requirements of this section and the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19. Critical areas reports for two or more types of critical areas must meet the report requirements for each relevant type of critical area. A. Preparation by a Qualified Professional. A frequently flooded areas report shall be prepared by a qualified professional who is a hydrologist or engineer, licensed in the state of Washington, with experience in preparing flood hazard assessments. Pursuant to ECDC 23.40.090(A), applicants may choose one of the qualified technical consultants on the city's approved list in preparing critical areas reports for frequently flooded areas, or may utilize an alternative consultant. Critical areas studies and reports developed by an alternative consultant shall be subject to independent review pursuant to ECDC 23.40.090(B). B. Areas to Be Addressed. The following areas shall be addressed in a critical areas report for frequently flooded areas: 1. The site area of the proposed activity; 2. All areas of a special flood hazard area, as indicated on the flood insurance map(s), within 200 feet of the project area; and 3. All other flood areas indicated on the flood insurance map(s) within 200 feet of the project area. C. Flood Hazard Assessment. A critical area report for a proposed activity within a frequently flooded area shall contain a flood hazard assessment including the following site- and proposal -related information at a minimum: 1. Site and Construction Plans. A copy of the site and construction plans for the development proposal showing: Page 60 of 92 Packet Pg. 417 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 a. Floodplain (100-year flood elevation), 10- and 50-year flood elevations, floodway, other critical areas, buffers, and shoreline areas; b. Proposed development, including the location of existing and proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, and drainage facilities, with dimensions indicating distances to the floodplain; c. Clearing limits; and d. Elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures, and the level to which any nonresidential structure has been floodproofed. 2. Watercourse Alteration. Alteration of natural watercourses shall be avoided, if feasible. If unavoidable, a critical areas report shall include: a. Extent of Watercourse Alteration. A description of and plan showing the extent to which a watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of a proposal; b. Maintenance Program Required for Watercourse Alterations. A maintenance program that provides maintenance practices for the altered or relocated portion of the watercourse to ensure that the flood - carrying capacity is not diminished. D. Information Regarding Other Critical Areas. Potential impacts to wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, and other critical areas shall be addressed in accordance with the applicable sections of this title. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.70.030 Warning and disclaimer of liability.0 SHARE The degree of flood protection required by this chapter and the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19, is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by manmade or natural causes. This chapter does not imply that land outside frequently flooded areas or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This chapter shall not create liability on the part of the city of Edmonds, any officer or employee thereof, or the Federal Insurance Administration for any flood damages that result from reliance on this chapter or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part III. Development Standards — Frequently Flooded Areas 23.70.040 Development standards — Frequently flooded areas-0 SHARE Development standards and provisions for protection of frequently flooded areas are provided as applicable to areas of special flood hazard in the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19. Conformance with the provisions for flood hazard reduction of the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19, shall constitute conformance with ECDC 23.40.050, Page 61 of 92 Packet Pg. 418 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Protection of critical areas, per the mandates of the Washington Growth Management Act and the purposes and objectives of this title. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Chapter 23.80 GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS T N T T Sections: Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping 23.80.000 Geologically hazardous areas compliance requirements flowchart. 23.80.010 Designation, rating and mapping —Geologically hazardous areas. 23.80.020 Designation of specific hazard areas. 23.80.030 Mapping of geologically hazardous areas. Part II. Allowed Activities — Geologically Hazardous Areas 23.80.040 Allowed activities — Geologically hazardous areas. Part III. Additional Report Requirements — Geologically Hazardous Areas 23.80.050 Special study and report requirements — Geologically hazardous areas. Part IV. Development Standards — Geologically Hazardous Areas 23.80.060 Development standards — General requirements. 23.80.070 Development standards — Specific hazards. Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping 23.80.000 Geologically hazardous areas compliance requirements flowchartA SHARE See Figure 23.80.000 at the end of this chapter. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.80.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Geologically hazardous areas.O SHARE Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding, earthquake, or other geological events. They pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible Page 62 of 92 Packet Pg. 419 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 development is sited in areas of significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development and use. Areas susceptible to one or more of the following types of hazards shall be designated as a geologically hazardous area: A. Erosion hazard; B. Landslide hazard; and T C. Seismic hazard. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. IM �r 23.80.020 Designation of specific hazard areas.O SHARE A. Erosion Hazard Areas. Erosion hazard areas are at least those areas identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service as having a "moderate to severe," "severe," or "very severe" rill and inter -rill erosion hazard. Erosion hazard areas are also those areas impacted by shoreland and/or stream bank erosion. Within the city of Edmonds erosion hazard areas include: 1. Those areas of the city of Edmonds containing soils that may experience severe to very severe erosion hazard. This group of soils includes, but is not limited to, the following when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater: a. Alderwood soils (15 to 25 percent slopes); b. Alderwood/Everett series (25 to 70 percent slopes); c. Everett series (15 to 25 percent slopes); 2. Coastal and stream erosion areas which are subject to the impacts from lateral erosion related to moving water such as stream channel migration and shoreline retreat. 3-2. Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage; and 4-3. Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. B. Landslide Hazard Areas. Landslide hazard areas are areas potentially subject to landslides based on a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors. They include areas susceptible because of any combination of b soil, slope (gradient), slope aspect, structure, hydrology, or other factors. Within the city of Edmonds potential landslide hazard areas speeifieally include: 1. Areas of ancient or historic failures in Edmonds which include all areas within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as identified in the 1979 report of Robert Lowe Associates and amended by the 1985 report of GeoEngineers, Inc. and further discussed in the 2007 report by Landau Associates; Page 63 of 92 Packet Pg. 420 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 2. Coastal areas mapped as class a (unstable), ups (unstable old slides), and urs (unstable recent slides) in the Department of Ecology Washington coastal atlas; 3. Areas designated as quaternary, steps, earthflows, mudflows, or landslides on maps published by the United States Geological Survey or Washington State Department of Natural Resources; Figure 1 Simple Slope Calculation The slope calculation guidance shall be used to determine the toe and top of% slope for slopes that are potentially landslide hazard areas or potentially erasion hazard areas. Toe and top of landslide hazard areas (generally slopes of 40% or greater) delineated where incline reverses or diminishes to <40Vo over at least 10 feet of horizontal distance. Toe and top of erosion hazard areas (generally slopes 15.40 %) delineated where incline reverses or diminishes to <15%over at IPast 10 fapt of hnri7nntal rlidanra WO% slop, hazard are slope (e ME a reaj over min 10 ft. 101 Top of Slope r V (Vertical Rise) % Slope = x 100% H QiorizontalRun) Note: Steps, grad! entchanges, and incline reversals o r brea ks b e low percent slopes deriving landslide hazard areas (40%) and erasion hazard areas (15%) shall he included as part of the larger slope. L 24. Any slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper that exceeds a vertical height of ten 00) feet over a twenty-five (25) foot horizontal run. Except for rockeries that have been engineered and approved by the x w engineer as having been built according to the engineered design, all other modified slopes (including c slopes where there are breaks in slopes,) meeting overall average steepness and height criteria should be W E considered potential landslide hazard areas); U a Page 64 of 92 Q Packet Pg. 421 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 5. Any slope with all three of the following characteristics: a. Slopes steeper than fifteen percent (15%); b. Hillsides intersecting geologic contacts with a relatively_ permeable sediment overlying a relatively impermeable sediment; and c. Springs or groundwater seepage; establishing its toe and top (as defined in Figure I in stibseetion (B)(1) of this seetion) and is meastir-ed by wvefaging the inelinatien ever- at least 10 feet of vet4ieal relief or- 25 feet of hefizental distanee, Benehes N T T �r steps and variations in gfadim shall be ineer-por-ated into a larger- slope if they do not mee d f C� criteria defining toe an&or- top depicted in Figure 1 in subseetion (B)(1) of this section (see also Figum-2 C at the end of this subseetion). if the toe or- top of a slope is loeated off of a subjeet pr-opet4y, then t leeatien ef the toe of top shall be delineated 200 hefizental feet frem the property boundafy of 4 i 0 whiehever- is eloser- to the sttbjeet par -eel (see Figufe 2 at the end of this V f 7 �l'1 36. Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision or stream bank erosion; 47. Any area located on an alluvial fan, presently subject to, or potentially subject to, inundation by debris flow or deposition of stream -transported sediments, and 8. Any slopes that have been modified by past development activity that still meet the slope criter - C. Seismic Hazard Areas. Seismic hazard areas are areas subject to severe risk of damage as a result of earthquake -induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement, soil liquefaction, lateral spreading, or surface faulting. These areas are designated as having a "high" and "moderate to high" risk of liauefaction as manned on the Liauefaction Susceptibility Man of Snohomish Countv by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources or areas located within er*earlandslide hazard areas. Settlement and soil li"efaetion eonditions oeeer- in areas ttnder-laia by eehesionless, loose, or- soft satufated soils of low density, typieally in asseeiation with a shallow gr-etmd water- ta [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004] . 23.80.030 Mapping of geologically hazardous areas.l SHARE A. The approximate location and extent of geologically hazardous areas are shown on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. In addition, resources providing information on the location and extent of geologically hazardous areas in Edmonds include: 1. Washington Department of Ecology coastal zone atlas (for marine bluffs); 2. U.S. Geological Survey geologic maps, landslide hazard maps, and seismic hazard maps; 3. Washington State Department of Natural Resources seismic hazard maps for Western Washington; Page 65 of 92 Packet Pg. 422 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 4. Washington State Department of Natural Resources slope stability maps; 5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration tsunami hazard maps; and 6. Federal Emergency Management Administration flood insurance maps. B. The critical areas inventory and the resources cited above are to be used as a guide for the city of Edmonds development services department, project applicants and/or property owners and may be continuously updated as new critical areas are identified. They are a reference and do not provide a final critical area designation. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part II. Allowed Activities — Geologically Hazardous Areas 23.80.040 Allowed activities — Geologically hazardous areas.0 SHARE The following activities are allowed in geologically hazardous areas as consistent with ECDC 23.40.220, Allowed activities, Chapter 19.10 ECDC, Building Permits — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas, and Chapter 18.30 ECDC, Storm Water Management, and do not require submission of a critical area report: A. Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Except for installation of fences and as otherwise provided for in this title, only those activities approved and permitted consistent with an approved critical areas report in accordance with this title shall be allowed in erosion or landslide hazard areas. B. Seismic Hazard Areas. The following activities are allowed within seismic hazard areas: 1. Construction of new buildings with less than 2,500 square feet of floor area or roof area, whichever is greater, and which are not residential structures or used as places of employment or public assembly; 2. Additions to existing single -story residences that are 250 square feet or less; and 3. Installation of fences. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part III. Additional Report Requirements — Geologically Hazardous Areas 23.80.050 Special study and report requirements — Geologically hazardous areas. SHARE Critical area report requirements for geologically hazardous areas are generally met through submission to the director of one or more geotechnical gieerreports. In addition to the general critical areas report requirements of ECDC 23.40.090, critical areas reports for geologically hazardous areas must meet the requirements of this section and Chapters 18.30 and 19.10 ECDC as applicable. Critical areas reports for two or more types of critical areas must meet the report requirements for each relevant type of critical area. Geotechnical report(s) submitted for the purpose of critical areas review are required as necessary in addition to reports, data and other information mandated per ECDC Titles 18 and 19. Geotechnical report(s) shall be required: whenever a potential erosion hazard area or potential landslide Page 66 of 92 Packet Pg. 423 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 hazard area, as mapped by Edmonds critical areas inventory or shown on other information consistent with ECDC 23.80.030, is located within 50 feet of the proposed development site; whenever a development site is located within a seismic hazard area; or when otherwise determined warranted by the director (e.g. a distance equal to the height of the slope). A. Preparation by a Qualified Professional. A critical areas report for assessing a potential geologically hazardous area shall be prepared by a geologist licensed in the state of Washington, with v experience analyzing geologic, hydrologic, and ground water flow systems, and who has experience preparing reports for the relevant type of hazard. If mitigation measures are necessary, the report detailing the mitigation measures and design of the mitigation shall be prepared by an engineer licensed in the State of Washington, with experience stabilizing slopes with similar geotechnical properties. c Critical areas studies and reports on geologically hazardous areas shall be subject to independent review pursuant to ECDC 23.40.090(B). B. Area Addressed in Critical Areas Report. The following areas shall be addressed in a critical areas report for geologically hazardous areas: 1. The project area of the proposed activity; and 2. All geologically hazardous areas within 200 feet of the project area or that have the potential to be affected by the proposal. C. Geological Hazards Assessment. A geology hazard assessment ^r-itie ' area report for a geologically hazardous area shall include a field investigation and contain an assessment of whether or not each type of geologic hazard identified in ECDC 20.80.020 is present or not present and if development of the site will increase the risk of landslides or erosion on or off the site. Geotechnical reports shall be prepared, stamped and signed _byqualified professional. These reports must: 1. Be appropriate for the scale and scope of the project; 2. Include a discussion of all geologically hazardous areas on the site and any geologically hazardous areas off site potentially pacted by the proposed project. If the affected area extends beyond the subject property, the geology hazard assessment may utilize existing data sources pertaining to that area; 3. Clearly state that the proposed project will not decrease slope stability or pose an unreasonable threat to persons or property either on or off site and provide a rationale as to those conclusions based on geologic conditions and interpretations specific to the project, 4. Provide adequate information to determine compliance with the requirements of ECDC Chapter 23.80; 5. Generally follow the guidelines set forth in the Washington State Department of Licensing Guidelines for Preparing Engineering Geology Reports in Washington (2006). In some cases, such as when it is determined that no landslide or erosion risk is present, a full report may not be necessary to determine compliance with the ECDC Chapter 23.80. and in those cases a letter or abbreviated report may be provided. Page 67 of 92 Packet Pg. 424 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 d 6. If a landslide or erosion hazard is identified, provide minimum setback recommendations for avoiding the landslide or erosion hazard, other recommendations for site development so that the frequency or magnitude of landsliding or erosion on or off the site is not altered, and recommendations consistent 0 with ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. geelegieal hazzar-ds ineluding the following site and proposal related infoFmation at a minin+HM.: .2 1. Site and Genstfuetion Plans. The fepot4 shall ifielttde a eepy of the site plans for- the pfoposal L V T N T a. The type and extent of geelegie hazafd T �r areas, any other- efifieal areas, and buffefs 7 adjaeent , IM I ;tt,;,, inn feet .for- that are likely. ; the proposal; +W b. Proposed development, ineluding the location of existing and proposed stmetufes, fill, storage of mmer-ials, and drainage f4eilities, with dimensions indieating distanees to the > G V e. The topography, in two foot eon4otir-s, of the pr-ojeet area and all hazard areas addressed in the Fepot4; u� anA T N U T L d , E d 0 d t the histofy landslides, Soils rt+ 7 and a review of site regarding erosion, and prior- r dn'[CCe, � The assessment si1all ineG7L but not limited4o. N hydrolo foond in the N L geology, f soils, and vegeta4ion Q� 7 (� b. A detailed the field O overview of 7 published 7 i+ the tests, M past assessments of site;4om and site speeifie 7 7 of studies = IM n A A--4—+4-- —r+l,o —r+-ko n44o +— n —A —+I,-, �. i,�i, �.; i. o v.4n• L a �L V > � :nivJcE}�'ivp�t�m�zf Y ecceed adjaeeH €tt;es; and L 4. Mininitim Buffer- md Building Setbaek. The fepeft shall make a r-eeemmendatieft fef the minim'&M T fie distefbanee buffer- and minimum building sethaek 4om any geolegie ha,-afd based upoff the 0otechr,i`.ni analysis. t . i( W �.i D. Incorporation of Previous Study. Where a valid critical areas report has been prepared within the last five years for a specific site, and where the proposed land use activity and surrounding site conditions z Page 68 of 92 Q Packet Pg. 425 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 are unchanged, said report may be incorporated into the required critical areas report. The applicant shall submit a hazards assessment detailing any changed environmental conditions associated with the site. E. Mitigation of Long -Term Impacts. When hazard mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall specifically address how the activity maintains or reduces the preexisting level of risk to the site and all Q other adjaeent-properties potentially pacted on a long-term basis (equal to or exceeding the projected 2 lifespan of the activity or occupation). Proposed mitigation techniques shall be considered to provide long-term hazard reduction only if they do not require regular maintenance or other actions to maintain their function. Mitigation may also be required to avoid any increase in risk above the preexisting conditions following abandonment of the activity. F. Additional Technical Information Requirements for Projects within Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. In addition to the basic critical areas report requirements for geologically hazardous areas provided in subsections A through E of this section, technical information for any development within Dearth subsidence and landslide hazard areas shall meet the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC and include the following information at a minimum: 1. Site Plan. The critical areas report shall include a copy of the site plan for the proposal showing: a. The height of slope, slope gradient, and cross-section of the project area; b. The location of springs, seeps, or other surface expressions of ground water on or within 200 feet of the project area or that have the potential to be affected by the proposal; and c. The location and description of surface water runoff features; 2. Hazards Analysis. The hazards analysis component of the critical areas report shall specifically include: a. A description of the extent and type of vegetative cover; b. A description of subsurface conditions based on data from site -specific explorations; c. Descriptions of surface and ground water conditions, public and private sewage disposal systems, fills and excavations, and all structural improvements; d. An estimate of slope stability and the effect construction and placement of structures will have on the slope over the estimated life of the structure; e. An estimate of the bluff retreat rate or an estimate of the percent risk of landslide area expansion that recognizes and reflects potential catastrophic events such as seismic activity or a 100-year storm event; f. Consideration of the run -out hazard of landslide debris and/or the impacts of landslide run -out on down -slope properties; g. A study of slope stability including an analysis of proposed cuts, fills, and other site grading; Page 69 of 92 Packet Pg. 426 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 h. Recommendations for building siting limitations; and i. An analysis of proposed surface and subsurface drainage, and the vulnerability of the site to erosion; 3. Geotechnical Engineering Report. The technical information for a project within a landslide hazard area shall include a geotechnical engineering report prepared by a licensed engineer that presents engineering recommendations for the following: a. Parameters for design of site improvements including appropriate foundations and retaining structures. These should include allowable load and resistance capacities for bearing and lateral loads, installation considerations, and estimates of settlement performance; c b. Recommendations for drainage and subdrainage improvements; c. Earthwork recommendations including clearing and site preparation criteria, fill placement and compaction criteria, temporary and permanent slope inclinations and protection, and temporary excavation support, if necessary; and d. Mitigation of adverse site conditions including slope stabilization measures and seismically unstable soils, if appropriate; 4. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. For any development proposal on a site containing an erosion hazard area, an erosion and sediment control plan shall be required. The erosion and sediment control plan shall be prepared in compliance with requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC. G. Limited Report Requirements for Stable Erosion Hazard Areas. At the director's discretion, detailed critical areas report requirements may be waived for erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability. Report requirements for stable erosion hazard areas may be met through construction documents that shall include at a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC. H. Seismic Hazard Areas. In addition to the basic critical areas report requirements for geologically hazardous areas provided in subsections A through E of this section, a critical areas report for a seismic hazard area shall also meet the following requirements: -21. The hazards analysis shall include a complete discussion of the potential impacts of seismic activity on the site (for example, forces generated and fault displacement). 32. A geotechnical engineering report shall evaluate the physical properties of the subsurface soils, especially the thickness of unconsolidated deposits and their liquefaction potential. If it is determined that the site is subject to liquefaction, mitigation measures appropriate to the scale of the development shall be recommended and implemented. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Page 70 of 92 Packet Pg. 427 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Part IV. Development Standards — Geologically Hazardous Areas 23.80.060 Development standards — General requirements. -1 SHARE A. Alterations of geologically hazardous areas or associated buffers may only occur for activities that: 1. Will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; N T T 2. Will not adversely impact other critical areas; _ 3. Are designed so that the hazard to the project is eliminated or mitigated to a level equal to or less than predevelopment conditions; and 4. Are certified as safe as designed and under anticipated conditions by a qualified engineer or geologist, licensed in the state of Washington. B. Critical Facilities Prohibited. Critical facilities shall not be sited within geologically hazardous areas unless there is no other practical alternative. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.80.070 Development standards — Specific hazards.A sHRRE ] A. Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing erosion or landslide hazards shall meet the requirements of ECDC 23.80.060, Development Standards — General Requirements, and the specific following requirements: 1. Minimum Building Setback. The minimum setback shall be the distance required to ensure the proposed structure will not be at risk from landslides for the life of the structure, considered to be one hundred and twenty (120) years and will not cause an increased risk of landslides taking place on or off the site. -Buffer- n o,,uifenwPA. A setback buffer- shall be established from all edges of landslide hazard areas. The size of the setbackbff fer shall be determined by the director consistent with recommendations provided in the geotechnical report to eliminate or minimize the risk of property damage, death, or injury resulting from landslides caused in whole or part by the development, based upon review of and concurrence with a critical areas report prepared by a qualified professional. 2. Buffer Reauirements. A buffer may be established with specific reauirements and limitations including but not limited to, drainage, grading, irrigation, and vegetation. Buffer requirements shall be determined by the director consistent with recommendations provided in the geotechnical report to eliminate or minimize the risk of property damage, death, or injury resulting from landslides caused in whole or nart by activities within the buffer area. based upon review of and concurrence with a critical areas report prepared byqualified professional. • Page 71 of 92 Packet Pg. 428 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 -23. Alterations. Alterations of an erosion or landslide hazard area, minimum building setback and/or _ _ T buffer may only occur for activities for which a hazards analysis is submitted and certifies that: T �r a. The alteration developmenwill not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; b. The alterationdeve opmeN* will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and c. Such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas; 3. Design Standards within erosion and landslide hazard areas. Development within an erosion or landslide hazard area and/or buffer shall be designed to meet the following basic requirements unless it can be demonstrated that an alternative design that deviates from one or more of these standards provides greater long-term slope stability while meeting all other provisions of this title. The requirement for long-term slope stability shall exclude designs that require regular and periodic maintenance to maintain their level of function. The basic development design standards are: a. The proposed development shall not decrease the factor of safety for landslide occurrences below the limits of 1.5 for static conditions and 1.2 for dynamic conditions. If stability at the proposed development site is below these limits, the proposed development shall provide practicable approaches to reduce risk to human safety and improve the factor of safety for landsliding. In no case shall the existing factor of safety be reduced for the subject property or adjacent properties; b. Structures and improvements shall be clustered to avoid geologically hazardous areas and other critical areas; c. Structures and improvements shall minimize alterations to the natural contour of the slope, and foundations shall be tiered where possible to conform to existing topography; d. Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve the most critical portion of the site and its natural landforms and vegetation; e. The proposed development shall not result in greater risk or a need for increased buffers on neighboring properties; f. The use of retaining walls that allow the maintenance of existing natural slope area is preferred over graded artificial slopes; and g. Development shall be designed to minimize impervious lot coverage; Page 72 of 92 Packet Pg. 429 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 4. Vegetation Retention. Unless otherwise provided or as part of an approved alteration, removal of vegetation from an erosion or landslide hazard area or related buffer shall be prohibited; 5. Seasonal Restriction. Clearing shall be allowed only from May 1 st to October 1 st of each year; provided, that the director may extend or shorten the dry season on a case -by -case basis depending on Q actual weather conditions, except that timber harvest, not including brush clearing or stump removal, 2 may be allowed pursuant to an approved forest practice permit issued by the city of Edmonds or the v Washington State Department of Natural Resources; N 6. Point Discharges. Point discharges from surface water facilities and roof drains onto or upstream from an erosion or landslide hazard area shall be prohibited except as follows: c a. Conveyed via continuous storm pipe downslope to a point where there are no erosion hazard areas downstream from the discharge; b. Discharged at flow durations matching predeveloped conditions, with adequate energy dissipation, into existing channels that previously conveyed storm water runoff in the predeveloped state; or c. Dispersed discharge upslope of the steep slope onto a low -gradient, undisturbed buffer demonstrated to be adequate to infiltrate all surface and storm water runoff, and where it can be demonstrated that such discharge will not increase the saturation of the slope; and 7. Prohibited Development. On -site sewage disposal systems, including drain fields, shall be prohibited within erosion and landslide hazard areas and related buffers. B. Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area. In addition to the requirements of this chapter, development proposals for lands located within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as indicated on the critical areas inventory shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC C. Seismic Hazard Areas. Activities proposed to be located in seismic hazard areas shall meet the standards of ECDC 23.80.060, Development Standards — General Requirements. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Page 73 of 92 Packet Pg. 430 City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 7.2.a Figure 23.80.000 CITY ❑F EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS Critical Areas Compliance Requirements* Geologically Hazardous Areas Geologically Geo-Haxa Geo•Hazardassess- Geotechnical.Report Development hazardous area REQUIRE mentconcludes REQUIREMENT to encroaches within (geo•hazard) may be ALntifyclassification and jurisdictional delineate boundaries delineated located on or near location of geo-hazard. geo-hazard area and extent of geo-hazard area subject parcel. located with in 200 it geo-hazard area- andlorminimum of subject parcel. buildingsetback- Goo-Hazard assessment concludes nojurisdic- DevelopmentavoIds G e otec h n ical Report It io nal geo-hazard geo-h azard area and REQUI REMENT to identify located G200 ft fro m required minimum design modifications and subject parcel. buildingsetback/ mitigation sufficient to buffer. avoid additional potential risk associated with development in and around geo-hazard areas. N o addition a I compliance requirements. No ad ditiona l compliance required. No additional compliance requirements upon implementation of geotechnical recommendations -Report requirements may be met through submission of a single critical area report or multiple reports in corn binawn. Page 74 of 92 Packet Pg. 431 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Chapter 23.90 FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS Sections: Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping v 23.90.000 Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas compliance requirements flowchart. T �r 23.90.010 Designation, rating and mapping —Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. c Part IL Additional Report Requirements — Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas 23.90.020 Special study and report requirements — Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas Part III. Development Standards — Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas 23.90.030 Development standards — General requirements. 23.90.040 Development standards — Specific habitats. Part I. Designation, Rating and Mapping 23.90.000 Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas compliance requirements flowchart.. SHARE _ See Figure 23.90.000 at the end of this chapter. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.90.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. SHARE A. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas in the city of Edmonds include: 1. Streams. Within the city of Edmonds streams shall include those areas where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which demonstrates clear evidence, such as the sorting of sediments, of the passage of water. The channel or bed need not contain water year-round. Streams shall be classified in accordance with the Washington Department of Natural Resources water typing system (WAC 222-16- 030) hereby adopted in its entirety by reference and summarized as follows: a. Type S: streams inventoried as "shorelines of the state" under Chapter 90.58 RCW and the rules promulgated pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW; b. Type F: streams which contain fish habitat; Page 75 of 92 Packet Pg. 432 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 c. Type Np: perennial nonfish habitat streams; and d. Type Ns: seasonal nonfish habitat streams. All streams included on the inventory that are known to exist within the city of Edmonds do not meet `` criteria for "shorelines of the state" but contain fish habitat and, thus, meet designation criteria for Type F waters pursuant to WAC 222-16-030. However, not all Edmonds streams support anadromous fish v populations or have the potential for anadromous fish occurrence because of obstructions, blockages or access restrictions resulting from existing conditions. Therefore, in order to provide special consideration of and increased protection for anadromous fish in the application of development standards, Edmonds streams shall be further classified as follows: c Anadromous fishbearing streams: streams existing in whole or in part within the city of Edmonds in which anadromous fish are known to occur. As of 2004, Edmonds fishbearing streams are known to include Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek, Hindley Creek, Perrinville Creek, and Lunds Creek; and Nonanadromous fishbearing streams: streams existing in whole or in part within the city of Edmonds which do not support fish populations and do not have the potential for fish occurrence because of barriers to fish passage or lack of suitable habitat. Streams with anadromous fish occurrence were identified in the Edmonds Stream Inventory and Assessment, a 2002 report of Pentec Environmental which is incorporated by this reference as if herein set forth. The city of Edmonds advocates and encourages the removal of barriers to anadromous fish passage consistent with the purposes and objectives of this title. The director may provide updated information on the occurrence of anadromous fish in Edmonds streams consistent with changes in existing environmental conditions. 2. Areas with VA+ieh-which State or Federally Designated Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive Species Have a Primary Association, or offer important fish and wildlife habitat within the urban environment_ a. Federally designated endangered and threatened species are those fish and wildlife species identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the NOAA Fisheries that are in danger of extinction or threatened to become endangered. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service should be consulted for current listing status. b. State -designated endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are those fish and wildlife species native to the state of Washington identified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, that are in danger of extinction, threatened to become endangered, vulnerable, or declining and are likely to become endangered or threatened in a significant portion of their range within the state without cooperative management or removal of threats. State -designated endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are periodically recorded in WAC 232-12-014 (state endangered species) and WAC 232-12-011 (state threatened and sensitive species). The state Department of Fish and Wildlife maintains the most current listing and should be consulted for current listing status. Page 76 of 92 Packet Pg. 433 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 3. State Priority Habitats and Areas Associated with State Priority Species. Priority habitats and species are considered to be priorities for conservation and management. Priority species require protective measures for their perpetuation due to their population status, sensitivity to habitat alteration, and/or recreational, commercial, or tribal importance. Priority habitats are those habitat types or elements with unique or significant value to a diverse assemblage of species. A priority habitat may consist of a unique vegetation type or dominant plant species, a described successional stage, or a specific structural element. Priority habitats and species are identified by the state Department of Fish and Wildlife. 4. Habitats and Species of Local Importance. Habitats and species of local importance are those identified by the city of Edmonds, including but not limited to those habitats and species that, due to their population status or sensitivity to habitat manipulation, warrant protection. Habitats may include a c seasonal range or habitat element with which a species has a primary association, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term. 4-5. Commercial and Recreational Shellfish Areas. These areas include all public and private tidelands or bedlands suitable for shellfish harvest, including shellfish protection districts established pursuant to Chapter 90.72 RCW. 56. Kelp and eelgrass beds and herring and smelt spawning areas. 6-7. Naturally Occurring Ponds Under 20 Acres. Naturally occurring ponds are those ponds under 20 acres and their submerged aquatic beds that provide fish or wildlife habitat, including those artificial ponds intentionally created from dry areas in order to mitigate impacts to ponds. Naturally occurring ponds do not include ponds deliberately designed and created from dry sites, such as canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, temporary construction ponds, and landscape amenities, unless such artificial ponds were intentionally created for mitigation. 79. Waters of the State. Waters of the state include lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters, and all other surface waters and watercourses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington, as classified in WAC 222-16-031 (or WAC 222-16-030, depending on classification used). B. All areas within the city of Edmonds meeting one or more of these criteria, regardless of any formal identification, are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this title and shall be managed consistent with the best available science, such as the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Management Recommendations for Priority Habitat and Species. Page 77 of 92 Packet Pg. 434 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 C. Mapping. The approximate location and extent of fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas are shown on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. Resources providing information on the location and extent of fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas incorporated into the inventory include: 1. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife priority habitat and species maps; 2. Washington State Department of Natural Resources official water type reference maps, as amended; 3. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Puget Sound intertidal habitat inventory maps; T �r 4. Washington State Department of Natural Resources shorezone inventory; 5. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program mapping data; 6. Washington State Department of Health annual inventory of shellfish harvest areas; 7. Anadromous and resident salmonid distribution maps contained in the habitat limiting factors reports published by the Washington Conservation Commission; and 8. Washington State Department of Natural Resources state natural area preserves and natural resource conservation area maps. The critical areas inventory and the resources cited above are to be used as a guide for the city of Edmonds development services department, project applicants, and/or property owners and should be continuously updated as new critical areas are identified. They are a reference and do not provide a final critical areas designation. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part II. Additional Report Requirements — Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas 23.90.020 Special study and report requirements — Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. -3SHFRE In addition to the general critical areas report requirements of ECDC 23.40.090, critical area reports for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas must meet the requirements of this section. Critical areas reports for two or more types of critical areas must meet the report requirements for each relevant type of critical area. A. Preparation by a Qualified Professional. A critical areas report for a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area shall be prepared by a qualified professional who is a biologist with experience preparing reports for the relevant type of habitat. Pursuant to ECDC 23.40.090(A), applicants may choose one of the qualified technical consultants on the city's approved list in preparing critical areas reports for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, or may utilize an alternative consultant. Critical areas studies and reports developed by an alternative consultant shall be subject to independent review pursuant to ECDC 23.40.090(B). Page 78 of 92 Packet Pg. 435 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 B. Areas Addressed in Critical Areas Report. The following areas shall be addressed in a critical areas report for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas: 1. The project area of the proposed activity; 2. All fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and recommended buffers within 200 feet of the project area; 3. All shoreline areas, floodplains, other critical areas, and related buffers within 200 feet of the project area; and- 4. A discussion of the efforts to avoid and minimize potential effects to these resources and the implementation of mitigation/enhancement measures as required. C. Habitat Assessment. A habitat assessment is an investigation of the project area to evaluate the potential presence or absence of designated critical fish or wildlife species or habitat. A critical areas report for a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area shall contain an assessment of habitats, including the following site- and proposal -related information at a minimum: 1. Detailed description of vegetation on and adjacent to the project area and its associated buffer; 2. Identification of any species of local importance, priority species, or endangered, threatened, sensitive, or candidate species that have a primary association with habitat on or adjacent to the project area, and assessment of potential project impacts to the use of the site by the species; 3. A discussion of any federal, state, or local special management recommendations, including Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife habitat management recommendations, that have been developed for species or habitats located on or adjacent to the project area. D. Additional Technical Information Requirements for Streams. Consistent with specific development standards for Edmonds streams (ECDC 23.90.040(D)), critical areas report requirements for streams may be met, at the discretion of the director, through submission of one or more specific report types. If stream buffer enhancement is proposed to reduce a standard stream buffer width or as part of project mitigation required by the director, a stream buffer enhancement plan may be submitted to fulfill the requirements of this section. If no project impacts are anticipated and standard stream buffer widths are retained, a stream survey report, general critical areas report or other reports alone or in combination may be submitted as consistent with the specific requirements of this section. In addition to the basic critical areas report requirements for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas provided in subsections (A) through (C) of this section, technical information on streams shall include the following information at a minimum: 1. A written assessment and accompanying maps of the stream and associated hydrologic features within 200 feet of the project area, including the following information at a minimum: a. Stream survey showing the ordinary high water mark(s); Page 79 of 92 Packet Pg. 436 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 b. Standard stream buffer boundary; c. Boundary for proposed reduced stream buffers; d. Vegetative, faunal, and hydrologic characteristics; e. Soil and substrate conditions; and v f. Topographic elevations, at two -foot contours; T 2. A detailed description and functional assessment of the stream buffer under existing conditions c pertaining to the protection of stream functions, fish habitat and, in particular, potential anadromous fisheries; 2 3. A habitat and native vegetation conservation strategy that addresses methods to protect and enhance on -site habitat and stream functions; 4. Proposed buffer enhancement, if needed, including a written assessment and accompanying maps and planting plans for buffer areas to be enhanced, including the following information at a minimum: a. A description of existing buffer conditions; b. A description of proposed buffer conditions and how proposed conditions will increase buffer functioning in terms of stream and fish habitat protection; c. Performance standards for measuring enhancement success through a monitoring period of at least three years; and d. Provisions for monitoring and submission of monitoring reports documenting buffer conditions as compared to performance standards for enhancement success; 5. A discussion of ongoing management practices that will protect stream functions and habitat value through maintenance of vegetation density within the stream buffer. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Part III. Development Standards — Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas 23.90.030 Development standards — General requirements.0 SHARE A. Alterations. A fish and wildlife habitat conservation area may be altered only if the proposed alteration of the habitat or the mitigation proposed does not degrade the quantitative and qualitative functions and values of the habitat. There are no specific development standards for upland habitats of local importance unless these areas include another critical area (streams, heron rookeries, steep slopes, etc.). City staff will review the critical areas report (ECDC 23.90.020) and work with the applicant to minimize effects or improve conditions to upland habitat. Page 80 of 92 Packet Pg. 437 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 B. Approvals of Activities. The director shall condition approvals of activities allowed within or adjacent to a habitat conservation area or its buffers as necessary to minimize or mitigate any potential adverse impacts. Conditions shall be based on the best available science and may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Establishment of buffer zones; 2. Preservation of critically important vegetation and/or habitat features such as snags and downed wood; T �r 3. Limitation of access to the habitat area, including fencing to deter unauthorized access; 4. Seasonal restriction of construction activities; 5. Establishment of a duration and timetable for periodic review of mitigation activities; and 6. Requirement of a performance bond, when necessary, to ensure completion and success of proposed mitigation. C. Mitigation and Equivalent or Greater Biological Functions. Mitigation of alterations to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas shall achieve equivalent or greater biologic and hydrologic functions and shall include mitigation for adverse impacts upstream or downstream of the development proposal site. Mitigation shall address each function affected by the alteration to achieve functional equivalency or improvement on a per function basis. Mitigation shall be located on -site except when demonstrated that a higher level of ecological functioning would result from an off -site location. Mitigation shall be detailed in a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area mitigation plan, which may include the following as necessary: 1. A native vegetation planting plan; 2. Plans for retention, enhancement or restoration of specific habitat features; 3. Plans for control of nonnative invasive plant or wildlife species; and 4. Stipulations for use of innovative, sustainable building practices. D. Approvals and the Best Available Science. Any approval of alterations or impacts to a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area shall be supported by the best available science. E. Buffers. 1. Establishment of Buffers. The director shall require the establishment of temporary or permanent buffer areas for permitted activities adjacent to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas which may result in fish or wildlife disturbance (e.g., construction, grading, etc.) when needed to protect fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. Establishment of buffers shall follow recommendations set forth by a qualified biologist in the project critical areas report. Required buffer widths shall reflect the sensitivity Page 81 of 92 Packet Pg. 438 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 of the habitat and the type and intensity of human activity proposed to be conducted nearby and shall be consistent with the management recommendations issued by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2. Seasonal and Daily Timing Restrictions. When a species is more susceptible to adverse impacts `` during specific periods of the year or day, seasonal restrictions on permitted activities within or adjacent 2 to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas may be required at the discretion of the director pursuant v to recommendations set forth in a critical areas report. N F. Signs and Fencing of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. 1. Temporary Markers. The outer perimeter of the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or buffer and the limits of those areas to be disturbed pursuant to an approved permit or authorization shall be marked in the field as required by the director in such a way as to ensure that no unauthorized intrusion will occur. This temporary marking shall be maintained throughout construction and shall not be removed until permanent signs, if required, are in place. 2. Permanent Signs. As a condition of any permit or authorization issued pursuant to this chapter, the director may require the applicant to install permanent signs along the boundary of a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or buffer. a. Permanent signs shall be made of a metal face and attached to a metal post or another material of equal durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot or every 50 feet, whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity. The sign shall be worded as follows or with alternative language approved by the director: Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area Do Not Disturb Contact the City of Edmonds Regarding Uses and Restriction b. The provisions of subsection (F)(2)(a) of this section may be modified by the director as necessary to assure protection of sensitive features or wildlife. 3. Fencing. a. The director shall determine if fencing is necessary to protect the functions and values of the critical area. If found to be necessary, the director shall condition any permit or authorization issued pursuant to this chapter to require the applicant to install a permanent fence at the edge of the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or buffer, when fencing will prevent future impacts to the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area. Page 82 of 92 Packet Pg. 439 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 b. The applicant shall be required to install a permanent fence around the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or buffer when domestic grazing animals are present or may be introduced on -site. c. Fencing installed as part of a proposed activity or as required in this subsection shall be designed so as to not interfere with species migration, including fish runs, and shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes habitat impacts. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. 23.90.040 Development standards — Specific habitats.0 SHRRE N T A. Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive Species. _ 1. No development shall be allowed within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or buffer with which state or federally endangered, threatened, or sensitive species have a primary association, except that which is provided for by a management plan established by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or applicable state or federal agency. 2. Whenever activities are proposed adjacent to a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area with which state or federally endangered, threatened, or sensitive species have a primary association, such area shall be protected through the application of protection measures in accordance with a critical areas report prepared by a qualified professional and approved by the director. Approval for alteration of land adjacent to the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or its buffer shall not occur prior to consultation with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for animal species, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for plant species, and other appropriate federal or state agencies. 3. Bald eagle habitat is subject to the Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Washington State bald eagle protection rules (WAC 232-12-292) shall not be required as long as bald eagles are not listed as a State Endangered or Threatened species. Bald eagle habitat shall be pr-oteete " nt t within 800 feet of a verified nest teffitery or- eemmunal r-eest, a habitat management plan shall be developed by a Valified-ffefessional. The dkeeter- shall verify the leeation of eagle management afeas for- eaeb proposed aetivity. Appr-oval of the aetivity shall not 3 approval of the habitat management plan by the Washington Department of Fist, and Wfldli;f. B. Anadromous Fish. 1. All activities, uses, and alterations proposed to be located in water bodies used by anadromous fish or in areas that affect such water bodies shall give special consideration to the preservation and enhancement of anadromous fish habitat, including, but not limited to, adhering to the following standards: a. Activities shall be timed to occur only during the allowable work window as designated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for the applicable species; b. An alternative alignment or location for the activity is not feasible; Page 83 of 92 Packet Pg. 440 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 c. The activity is designed so that it will not degrade the functions or values of the fish habitat or other critical areas; d. Shoreline erosion control measures shall be designed to use bioengineering methods or soft armoring techniques, according to an approved critical areas report; and e. Any impacts to the functions or values of the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area are mitigated v in accordance with an approved critical areas report. N 2. Structures that prevent the migration of salmonids shall not be allowed in the portion of water bodies currently or historically used by anadromous fish. Fish bypass facilities shall be provided that allow the c upstream migration of adult fish and shall prevent fry and juveniles migrating downstream from being trapped or harmed. 3. Fills, when authorized, shall not adversely impact anadromous fish or their habitat or shall mitigate any unavoidable impacts and shall only be allowed for a water -dependent use. C. Retention of Vegetation on Subdividable, Undeveloped Parcels. As a provision of this title, the director shall require retention of a minimum of 30 percent of native vegetation on undeveloped (or redeveloped), subdividable lands zoned as RS-12 or RS-20 per Chapter 16.10 ECDC. This standard for development shall apply to all undeveloped (or redeveloped), subdividable lands zoned RS-12 or RS-20 regardless of the petei4ial for- designatien as a fish and wildlife habitat eensefvafien area or- other- er-itieal. areathat contain a landslide hazard area as defined by ECDC 23.80.020.B; a stream or stream buffer; or a wetland or wetland buffer, except for as provided in ECDC 23.90.040.C.4._This provision for native vegetation retention will provide increased protection of fish and wildlife habitat throughout the Edmonds jurisdiction, and shall be applied consistent with the following criteria: 1. Achieving the minimum 30 percent retention requirement for native vegetation shall be determined by assessing the existing site area that supports native vegetation. For purposes of this provision, areas that support native vegetation shall include areas dominated by plant species which are indigenous to the Puget Sound region, which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site, and within which native trees over 10 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH) make up more than 70 percent of the canopy cover. 2. The goal of 30 percent native vegetation can be met through maintaining existing native vegetation, establishing native vegetation, or a combination of both. 3. A vegetation management plan, subject to the approval of the director, is required for approval of the proposed development. 4. For undeveloped (or redeveloped), subdividable lands zoned as RS-12 or RS-20 that currently do not support any native vegetation areas meeting minimum requirements in ECDC 23.90.040.C.1, the director may waive the requirements of this provision. D. Streams. No alteration to a stream or stream buffer shall be permitted unless consistent with the provisions of this title and the specific standards for development outlined below. Page 84 of 92 Packet Pg. 441 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 1. Standard Stream Buffer Widths. Buffers for streams shall be measured on each side of the stream, from the ordinary high water mark. The following shall be the standard buffer widths for streams based upon the Washington State Department of Natural Resources water typing system and further classification based upon fish presence (fishbearing vs. nonfishbearing) for the Type F streams existing in the city of Edmonds: a. Type S: 150 feet; b. Type F anadromous fishbearing stream adjacent to reaches with anadromous fish access: 100 feet; T �r c. Type F anadromous fishbearing stream adjacent to reaches without anadromous fish access: 75 feet; d. Type F nonanadromous fishbearing stream: 75 feet; e. Type Np: 50 feet; f. Type Ns: 2-540 feet. General areas and stream reaches with access for anadromous fish are indicated on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. The potential for anadromous fish access shall be confirmed in the field by a qualified biologist as part of critical areas review and determination of standard stream buffer widths. 2. Reduced Stream Buffer Widths. Standard stream buffer widths may be reduced by no more than -58 twenty. f�percent 25%) of the standard stream buffer width concomitant to development and implementation of a stream buffer enhancement plan approved by the director. Reduced stream buffer widths shall only be approved by the director if a stream buffer enhancement plan conclusively demonstrates that enhancement of the reduced buffer area will not degrade the quantitative and qualitative functions and values of the buffer area in terms of fish and stream protection and the provision of wildlife habitat. Stream buffer enhancement plans must meet the specific requirements of ECDC 23.40.110, 23.40.120 and 23.40.130 and: a. , will pr-ovide equivalent to or- gr-ea than a star ar- b„ff r w itho„* o„h,,,,,.o.,..o„*The buffer enhancement plan proposed as part of buffer reduction provides evidence that functions and values in terms of stream and wildlife protections will bea,,,,ivale„t t o eater than a standard buff- ,.without enha,,,o, en : i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation _ is generally intact; or ii. Increased through plan implantation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the functions and values of the stream; b. The plan documents existing native plant densities and provides for increases in buffer native plant densities to no less than three feet on center for shrubs and eight feet on center for trees; Page 85 of 92 Packet Pg. 442 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 c. The plan requires monitoring and maintenance to ensure success for a minimum of tie -five 5 years in accordance with ECDC 23.40.130(D) and (E); and d. The plan specifically documents methodology and provides performance standards for assessing increases in stream buffer functioning as related to: i. Water quality protection; v ii. Provision of wildlife habitat; T �r iii. Protection of anadromous fisheries; c iv. Enhancement of fish habitat; and v. Restricting intrusion and disturbance. 3. Stream Buffer Width Averaging with Enhancement. The director may allow modification of a standards stream buffer width in accordance with an approved critical areas report and the best available science on a case -by -case basis by averaging buffer widths. Any allowance for averaging buffer widths shall onlv be granted concomitant to the development and implementation of a buffer enhancement plan for areas of buffer degradation. Only those portions of a stream buffer existing within the project area or subject parcel shall be considered in the total buffer area for buffer averaging. Averaging of buffer widths may only be allowed where a qualified professional demonstrates that: a. The buffer enhancement plan proposed as part of buffer averaging provides evidence that functions and values in terms of stream and wildlife protections will be: i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation is generally intact; or ii. Increased through plan implantation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the functions and values of the stream; b. The total area contained in the buffer area, or the total buffer area existing on a subject parcel for a stream extending off -site, after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within the standard buffer; bc. The buffer width at any single location is not reduced to less than -5875 percent of the reduced or standard width; and 4. Additions to Structures Existing within Stream Buffers. Page 86 of 92 Packet Pg. 443 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 a. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within stream buffers that increase the footprint of development or impervious surfacing shall be permitted consistent with the development standards of this chapter (ECDC 23.90.030 and this section) -,provided that a buffer enhancement plan is provided to 0 mitigate for impacts consistent with this Title, and provided that all impacts from temporary disturbances within the critical area buffer shall be addressed through use of best management plans and a buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed alteration. Provisions for 2 standard stream buffers, buffer- r-eduetiendffoRgh enhaneement, and stream buffer averaging with v enhancement, and buffer reductions through enhancement require applicants to locate such additions in accordance with the following sequencing: T �r ai. Outside of the standard stream buffer; bii. Outside of a stream buffer averaged (with enhancement) per subsection (D)(�3) of this section; eiii. Outside of a stream buffer reduced (with enhancement) *h,.,,,,,,h, b r ,..o, , ,;,, . per subsection (D)(�2) of this section; or div. Outside of the inner twenty five percent (25to) pereen4 of the standard stream buffer width through the ttse of both buffer reduction and bt pro avera gwith no more than three hundred (300) square feet of structure addition footprint within the inner fifty percent (50%) of the standard stream buffer width, provided that enhancement is provided at a minimum three -to -one (3:1, ratio (enhancement -to -impact). v. Outside of the inner 25 oercent of the standard stream buffer width with no more than five hundred (500)square feet of new footprint within the inner fifty percent (50%) of the standard stream buffer width, provided that enhancement is provided at a minimum five -to -one (5:1,) ratio (enhancement -to - impact), and that stormwater low impact development (LID)techniques or other measures that enhance existing buffer condition are included as part of the stream buffer enhancement plan. b. Where meeting stream buffer enhancement reauirements reauired by H.1. of this section would result in enhancement that is separated from the critical area due to uncommon property ownership, alternative enhancement approaches may be approved by the director. Alternative approaches could include a vegetated rain garden that receives storm runoff, replacement of existing impervious surfaces with pervious materials, or other approaches that provide ecological benefits to the adjacent critical area. c_Additions to legally constructed structures existing within stream buffers that cannot be accommodated in accordance with the above sequencing (i.e., additions proposed within the inner 25 percent of a standard buffer width) may be permitted at the director's discretion as a variance subject to review by the city hearing examiner and the provisions of ECDC 23.40.210. 5. Development Proposals within the Footprint of Existing Development. New development shall be allowed within the footprint of existing development occurring within a stream buffer, provided that the following conditions are met: a. The footprint of existing development was legally established, and is consistent with the definition provided in ECDC 23.40.320; Page 87 of 92 Packet Pg. 444 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 b. The proposed development within the footprint of existing development is sited as far away from the stream edge as is feasible; c. As part of the development proposal, opportunities to reduce the footprint of existing development evelopment are implemented where such reduction would increase the buffer width adjacent to the stream and not represent an undue burden given the scale of the proposed development. d. The proposed development includes enhancement to the adjacent remaining stream buffer in order to improve functions degraded ded by previous development; T �r e. Enhancement is provided as buffer enhancement for an equivalent area of the footprint of the newly proposed development within in the footprint of existing development evelopment occurring in stream buffer, or through an alternative approach approved by the director that restores degraded functions of the wetland and remaining buffer; and f. Impacts from temporary disturbances within the stream buffer shall be addressed through use of best management plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed alteration. -56. Stream Crossings. Stream crossings may be allowed only if all reasonable construction techniques and best management practices are used to avoid disturbance to the stream bed or bank. Upon completion of construction, the area affected shall be restored to an appropriate grade, replanted with native species and/or otherwise protected according to a stream mitigation and buffer enhancement plan approved by the director, and maintained and monitored per the requirements of ECDC 23.40.110, 23.40.120 and 23.40.130 and providing for buffer enhancement in accordance with the requirements of subsection (D)(2) of this section. In addition, the applicant must demonstrate that best management practices will be used during construction to provide the following: a. Fisheries protection, including no interference with fish migration or spawning; b. All crossings shall be constructed during summer low flow periods and shall be timed to avoid stream disturbance during periods when stream use is critical to salmonids; c. Crossings shall not occur over salmonid spawning areas unless no other possible crossing site exists; d. Crossings and culverted portions of the stream shall be minimized to the extent feasible and serve multiple purposes and multiple lots whenever possible; e. Roads may cross streams only on previously approved rights -of -way, provided no practical alternative exists and adequate provision is made to protect and/or enhance the stream through appropriate mitigation. Roads shall be designed and located to conform to topography, and maintained to prevent erosion and restriction of the natural movement of ground water as it affects the stream; f. Roads and utilities shall be designed in conjunction to minimize the area of disturbance to the stream; and Page 88 of 92 Packet Pg. 445 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 g. Roads shall be constructed so as to minimize adverse impacts on the hydrologic quality of the stream or associated habitat to a degree acceptable to the city2 h. An alternative alignment or location with less impact is not feasible; and i. The crossing will be designed as near as perpendicular with the water body as possible.. 67. Trails. After reviewing the proposed development and technical reports, the director may determine that a pedestrian -only trail may be allowed in a stream buffer; provided, nonimpervioussttr€aee materials are used, all appropriate provision is made to protect water quality, and all applicable permit v requirements have been met. No motorized vehicles shall be allowed within a stream or its buffer except c as required for necessary maintenance or security. Vegetative edges, structural barriers, signs or other measures must be provided wherever necessary to protect streams by limiting vehicular access to designated public use or interpretive areas. -8. Storm Water Management Facilities. Storm water management facilities, limited to outfalls, pipes and conveyance systems, storm water dispersion outfalls and bioswales, may be allowed within stream buffers; provided, that: a. No other location is feasible; b. Pipes and conveyance facilities will be in the outer twenty five percent (25%) of the buffer; c. Stormwater dispersion outfalls, bioswales, and bioretention facilities may be allowed anywhere within stream buffers: d. Such facilities are designed consistent with requirements of ECDC Chapter 18.30; and be. The location and function of such facilities will not degrade the functions or values of the stream or stream buffer. -99. City Discretion in Protection, Enhancement and Preservation of Streams. The city of Edmonds is unique within the state of Washington as a built -out community with streams that have been incorporated within, and often located immediately adjacent to, residential development. This title allows the director full discretion to condition proposals for development on parcels containing, adjacent to, or potentially impacting streams to enhance conditions consistent with ECDC 23.40.050 and the purposes and objectives of this title. Conditions on development shall be required to enhance streams and stream buffers as fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas to provide increased protection of anadromous fisheries and potential fish habitat in accordance with best available science and the recommendations of an approved critical areas report and may include: a. Removal of stream bank armoring; b. In -stream habitat modification; c. Native planting; Page 89 of 92 Packet Pg. 446 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 d. Relocation of stream channel portions to create contiguous riparian corridors or wildlife habitat; e. Planting of stream bank native vegetation to increase stream shading; f. Removal and control of nonnative, invasive weed species; g. Requiring additional building setbacks or modified buffers; and v T h. Limiting or reducing the types or densities of particular uses. T �r The right of discretion in provisioning development in regard to streams is maintained in order to provide for the creation of enhanced conditions over those currently existing around streams in the city of Edmonds. In all instances where an applicant cannot demonstrate that standard stream buffer widths as provided in subsection (D)(1) of this section can be accommodated by project development, the applicant shall be required to submit a stream buffer enhancement plan or a stream mitigation and buffer enhancement plan as part of a critical areas report indicating that post -project site conditions will provide equivalent or greater protection of stream functions and fish habitat over a standard stream buffer and existing site conditions. [Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Figure 23.90.000 CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS Critical Areas Compliance Requirements` Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Fish and 4YddUile [recital Areu R�Irnn Ccal Arta Report 11, l I! •. Crrea irinl AReporl CriRk'A Arrd mieiprinn Rl— HahimnCoreervatioa nt;RE4U]RL•51LN71u idtn,ifirs jurisdiceional IS4's+ MgUIREMEN7 L<i Rrporlo Chides _ REQUIREDln Arta 4 WkCA)11My sdenriep prc enrrrn dtta wi1hm210 fi of I—i& L. -r.--P' dsar idowralo ,sL-IL r uc6-1. be bmied on or near juriwlicLinna] E1191[h. vhja, panel. of h.11 ital srd kt.ALfy FWJ�C:A will liPal}• retain nrnk� 5c Jm tablea puoti wiehin 11ir nF rnlamliil nnpw, .suliing Xswr from proian In�cNun: and valucv sul+icnpurc�l., Impsp.geridevel. dnrdopnimr. nlwildlifvhabLi . Critiwl Aeon Report fupas[mndttd<s carlcltsdra Ilo that hnbiret means N„ xtsiilinntl juridictiorml errns fe and colors will ll not ht rnnsplinncr ] Kotud within X0 R 4 drrxs-d through proiocv Tequirrnunts. suhirtt parcel. 4mlopmmr. N uidiQ—t No odditinnel snmpli,r, campluna r loin -U. rcgLdrcmrnlR 9Lxaam�ufkrEdmkiatal Sr,eeos Survey REQUIRED i'Han REQUipEII w In d—lj su�uni a"d 3Toi"r will rcznll dtmomtrow rtmlon of JYotrxr... !L, sitt or in s1wn)or bllfkr anNln and bufkr fnik]"i Impactr•10 strcnrn wsl.TiMin uad buffer l+ulfer,<, lti "P.led L, � impects s.ilh'tandem � aad t'al,lcsxirh reduced � huf er moicW ihmugh wn m-d-d buffer L—Jes l inlpL3- uladou r it 11 b4i—idllm bttfl.ct widrhiw 5u%). bufcrwduction. wedih, mmH6nli1u0c7 width. 1 Nk-dda... I Noaddilional %trcarnbufferrvreging Further burr- Noaddielunrl mimpbar— wntphorim — allawcd with odirianal — red-ti— needed Ire wmp1610c. mquirc lc TcquiMnicnas. buffer nhnnmiml. mid huller inslrcicm relrLUMHenes. 'Report requirements may be met through submission of a single rri6cal area report or multiple reports in combination. Page 90 of 92 Packet Pg. 447 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 Proposed Frequently Flooded Areas Code Amendment Building Code Amendment Amendment to Building Code requiring structures to be constructed two feet above base flood elevation: 19.00.025 International Building Code section amendments `,4 T Q. IBC section 1612.4.1, Lowest Flood Elevation, is added and reads: T �r For buildings in all structure categories located in the Coastal High Hazard Areas and Coastal A Flood Zones, the elevation c of the lowest floor shall be a minimum of two feet above the base flood elevation, as determined from the applicable FEMA a flood hazard man. m s Development Code Amendment to Address Height Issues — Definition of Height 21.40.030 Height. A. Height means the average vertical distance from the average level of the undisturbed soil of the site covered by a structure to the highest point of the structure. (See subsection (D) of this section for exceptions to this rule.) B. "Average level" shall be determined by averaging elevations of the downward projections of the four corners of the smallest rectangle which will enclose all of the building, excluding a maximum of 30 inches of eaves. If a corner falls off the site, its elevation shall be the average elevation of the two points projected downward where the two sides of the rectangle cross the property line. (See subsection (D) of this section for exceptions to this rule.) C. Accessory buildings that are attached to the main building by a breezeway, hallway, or other similar connection so that the accessory building is separated by 10 feet or less from the main building shall be considered to be part of the main building for purposes of determining the average level. For the purposes of this section, in order for an accessory building to be considered to be attached to and a part of the main building, the connecting structure must have a roof and be constructed of similar materials to both the main building and the accessory building so that it appears to be a unified and consistently designed building. D. Height Exceptions. L For all properties located within the Coastal High Hazard Areas and Coastal A Flood Zones, height is measured from the elevation that is two feet above base flood elevation as identified from the applicable FEMA flood hazard map.; 2. Church steeples; 3. Elevator penthouses, not to exceed 72 square feet in horizontal section, or three feet in height, for that portion above the height limit; 4. Chimneys, not to exceed nine square feet in horizontal section or more than three feet in height, for that portion above the height limit. In RM districts, chimneys shall be clustered. No multiple -flue chimney shall exceed 39 square feet in horizontal section. The first chimney shall not exceed nine square feet in horizontal section, and other chimneys shall not exceed six square feet in horizontal section; 5. Vent pipes not to exceed 18 inches in height above the height limit; 6. Standpipes not to exceed 30 inches in height above the height limit; Page 91 of 92 Packet Pg. 448 7.2.a City of Edmonds — City Code and Community Development Code Environmentally Critical Areas — Proposed Code Updates, October 19, 2015 7. Solar energy installations not to exceed 36 inches in height above the height limit. Such an installation may be approved as a Type II staff decision if it is designed and located in such a way as to provide reasonable solar access while limiting visual impacts on surrounding properties; and 8. Replacement of existing rooftop HVAC equipment which exceeds the existing height limit, so long as the replacement equipment does not exceed the height of the existing equipment by more than 12 inches. The replacement equipment must have earned the Energy Star label. [Ord. 3866 § 1, 2011; Ord. 3728 § 2, 2009; Ord. 3654 § 1, 2007; Ord. 3569 § 2, 2005]. Page 92 of 92 Packet Pg. 449 7.2.b 23.40._ Contingent review procedure for certain types of development. A. Scope. The procedures set forth in this section shall apply to the following types of development activity within a critical area or critical area buffer when the proposed development would involve grading of an area of at least 600 square feet within what would be the standard buffer for that critical area: 1. Development within physically separated and functionally isolated stream or wetland buffers pursuant to ECDC 23.50.040.G.5 and ECDC 23.90.040.D.4 2. Critical areas restoration projects pursuant to ECDC 23.40.215 3. Wetland buffer width reductions through buffer enhancement pursuant to ECDC 23.50.040.G.4. 4. Stream buffer width reductions through buffer enhancement pursuant to ECDC 23.90.040.D.2. B. Notice of application. Development activity within the scope of subsection A, above, shall be processed as a Type II application, unless the process is altered according to subsection D, below. In addition to the notice provided pursuant to Title 20, notice of application for all such development shall also be sent to the city council by email. C. Contingent review process. Development activity within the scope of subsection A, above, shall be escalated to a Type III -A process when: 1. The city receives a request from any person for a public hearing within 14 days of the date of the notice of application; and 2. The public hearing request is accompanied by a hearing fee in the amount of 50% of the difference between the Type II and Type III -A application fee. D. Effect of contingent review. When the contingent review process is triggered pursuant to subsection D, above, the project applicant shall pay the other 50% of the difference between the Type II and Type III -A application fee, on top of the previously paid Type II application fee. The applicant shall pay this fee within 30 days of notice from the city that the fee is due. If the applicant fails to pay the additional fee within the required 30-day period, the application for the project shall be deemed withdrawn. The city shall not schedule the public hearing until the additional fee has been paid. For these public hearings, the cost of the hearing examiner shall be borne by the city. E. Notice of decision. Whether development activity within the scope of subsection A, above, is processed as a Type II application or escalated to a Type III -A application, notice of decision shall be sent by email to the city council in addition to any other notice that may be required by Title 20. F. Appeal of decision. It is expressly contemplated in the creation of this process that the city council may appeal hearing examiner's decisions arising from this process to the superior court under LUPA. Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 450 7.2.b 20.01.003 Permit type and decision framework. A. Permit Types. TYPE I TYPE II -A TYPE II-B TYPE III -A TYPE III-B TYPE IV -A TYPE IV-B TYPE V Zoning Accessory Contingent Outdoor dining Essential public Final formal Site specific Development Critical compliance letter dwelling unit facilities plats rezone agreements Area Review Lot line Formal Technological Design review Final planned Zoning text adjustment interpretation of impracticality (where public residential amendment; the text of the waiver for hearing by development area -wide zoning ECDC by the amateur radio architectural map amendments director antennas design board is required) Critical area SEPA Critical Area Shoreline Comprehensive determinations determinations Variance substantial plan amendments development, shoreline conditional use, shoreline variance Shoreline Preliminary short Contingent Conditional use Annexations Exemptions plat Critical Area permits (where Review if public public hearing by hearing requested hearing examiner is required) Minor Land Variances Development amendments to clearing/grading regulations planned residential development Minor Revisions to Home preliminary plat shoreline occupation amendment management permit (where permits public hearing by hearing examiner is required) Staff design Administrative Preliminary review, including variances formal plat signs Final short plat Land use permit Preliminary extension requests planned residential development Sales Guest house office/model (ECDC 17.70.005) Innocent purchaser determination B. Decision Table. Recommendation PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS (TYPE I — IV) LEGISLATIVE TYPE I TYPE II -A TYPE II-B TYPE III -A TYPE III-B TYPE IV -A TYPE IV-B TYPE V N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Planning board Planning board Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 451 7.2.b PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS (TYPE I — IV) LEGISLATIVE TYPE I TYPE II -A TYPE II-B TYPE III -A TYPE III-B TYPE IV -A TYPE IV-B TYPE V by: Final decision by: Director Director Director Hearing Hearing City council City council City council examiner examiner/ADB Notice of No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No application: Open record No Only if 1) If Yes, before Yes, before No Yes, before Yes, before public hearing or appealed, Director hearing hearing planning board planning board open record open record decision is examiner to examiner or which makes which makes appeal of a final hearing annealed, render final board to render recommendation recommendation decision: before open record decision final decision to council to council or hearing hearing council could examiner before hold its own hearing hearing examiner 2L converted to Type III -A process Closed record No No No No Yes, before the No Yes, before the review: council council Judicial appeal: Yes Yes Yc Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 20.03.002 Notice of application. C. Contents. The notice of application shall include the following information in a format determined by the director: 1. The date of submission of the initial application, the date of the notice of completion and acceptance of the application, and the date of the notice of application; 2. A description of the proposed project and a list of the development project permits requested in the application and, if applicable, a list of any studies requested under Chapter 36.7013 RCW; 3. A description of other required permits not included in the application, to the extent known by the city at that time; 4. A description of existing environmental documents that evaluate the proposed project, and, if not otherwise stated on the document providing notice of application, the location where the application and any studies can be reviewed; 5. A statement setting forth: (a) the time for the public comment period, which shall be not less than 15 days following the date of notice of application; (b) the right of any person to comment on the application, receive notice of and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application; and (c) any appeal rights; 6. The date, time, place and type of hearing, if a hearing has been scheduled when the date of notice of application is issued;. For Type II-B processes, the notice shall provide information regarding the process for requesting a public hearing in accordance with the applicable Type II-B permit application. 7. Any other information determined appropriate by the director such as the director's threshold determination, if complete at the time of issuance of the notice of application. Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 452 7.2.c OF ED& O �~ Edmonds City Council Agenda Memo Q. 0 Meeting Date: April 5, 2016 L Agenda Subject: Draft Critical Area Contingent Review Process Example o as L Staff Lead / Kernen Lien, Senior Planner a Author: r L Initiated By: ❑ City Council ❑ Planning Board ❑ City Staff v ❑Citizen Request Q Other: GMA Required CAO Update N Introduction: One of the proposed Council amendments relates to critical area reviews and a concern that certain critical area decisions should be subject to a higher level of scrutiny. Draft code language for a Critical Area Contingent Review process has been prepared by the City Attorney. As drafted the Critical Area Contingent Review process would apply to apply to critical area restoration projects, interrupted buffer determinations, and buffer width reductions where the development proposal that involve 600 square feet of grading within the standard critical area buffer. The process would begin as a Type II-B procedure which is staff decision with notice (including notice to the City Council). If during the comment period a party requests a public hearing and pays 50% of the permit cost difference between a Type II and Type III process, the permit process will be bumped up to a Type III -A permit process (Hearing Examiner decision with LUPA appeal). Below is an example of how this review process would work on an example development proposal within a standard stream buffer. A generalized depiction of this example development process is included as Attachment 1 to this memorandum. Situation: Property owner wishes to construct a 600 square foot garage on a developed property with a stream. Either buffer reduction or interrupted buffer provision may be applicable to the proposal. See aerial of property in Attachment 2. City of Edmonds caR City Council Packet Pg. 453 7.2.c Inititial Applications required: 1. Critical Area Determination 2. Building permit Permitting process: 1. Planning Staff Reviews Critical Area Application and issues a "Study Required" finding do to the presence of a stream. The stream requires a 75 foot buffer pursuant to ECDC 23.90.040.D. 2. Planning Staff Reviews the building permit application a. Staff notes 600 square feet disturbance within the standard buffer b. Staff notifies the applicant of the Contingent Review Process, applicant could i. Reduce the size of the garage ii. Pay $820 to continue with the Contingent Review Process N iii. A critical area report is required which ever direction the applicant chooses. 3. Applicant choses to continue with the Contingent Review Process and pays the $820 application fee. 4. City of Edmonds has a 28-day completeness review for Type II land use applications. 5. Type II application determined to be complete the City issues notice of application to adjacent property owners (300 feet of site), posts the site, publishes in the Everett Herald, and provides notice to the City Council. Notice has a 14 day comment period. 6. City receives request for public hearing within the 14-day comment payment. The party requesting the public pays $921, which is half the difference between Type II and Type III permit processes plus half of hearing examiner deposit. 7. Applicant pays $921 to continue with permit review as Type III within 30 days. 8. Staff issues notice of public hearing to adjacent property owners, posts site, publishes in Everett Herald, and provide notice to the City Council (At least 15 days before public hearing). 9. Public Hearing held. Hearing Examiner has 10 business days to issue decision. 10. Hearing Examiner issues decision and building permit process may be completed. 11. Hearing Examiner decision may be appealed under LUPA (RCW 36.70C). Typical Review Times 1. Building permit without contingent review process Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 454 7.2.c a. 10-15 business days first review, 5 - 10 for second review, 5 for third review b. Total quoted review time 25 — 30 business days 2. Contingent Review a. Type II without public hearing request i. Typical 1 — 2 months process time for Type II permits 1. 28 day completeness review M a) 2. 14 day comment period c 3. Any back and forth during project review 0 b. Type III L i. Typical 3 — 4 months process time for Type III a 1. Type II process (28 day completeness, 14 day comment) L t� 2. Type III process r N a. 30 — days for applicant to pay half of application fee b. Notice of public hearing at least 15 days before hearing a E c. 10 Business days for Hearing Examiner to make decision w 3. Any back and forth during project review Application Fees 1. Building permit application without contingent review - $1,173.50 a. Critical Area Determination - $155 application fee b. Building permit - $1,018.50 total fee; $326 due at time of application 2. Contingent Review Process a. Type II no public hearing request - $1,993.50 i. Building permit, critical area determination - $1,173.50 ii. Type II - $820 ($795 plus $25 city surcharge) b. Type III — $ 2,914.50 i. Building permit, critical area determination - $1,173.50 ii. Type II - $820 ($795 plus $25 city surcharge) iii. Half difference Type II to Type III when hearing requested - $921 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 455 7.2.c Critical Area Contingent Review Comparison Buildiniz Permit Review Building Permit Review �25 — 30 days $1173.50 Building Permit Review with Type II-B Critical Area Contingent Review Vingit Type II-B Contingent Review Review No Public Hearing Requested 1. 2 — 3 months $1993.50 Building Permit Review with with Public Hearine Type III -A Critical Area Contingent Review Contingent Review earing Requested 4 — 5 months $2,914.50 Type III -A Contingent Review Attachmi Packet Pg. 456 7.2.c f F i- EF Stream Requirin 75-foot Buffer T i Interupted Buffer/ Potential 56.25-foot Reduced -Buffer Project Area 72 AV Standard 75-foot Buffer 'nc. t g91 Critical Area Contingent Review Process: Example Site FNJ Scale 1 inch = 25 feet Attachmj Packet Pg. 457 W E [1 Wl �F ZIA + FEMA Region X VE AE AO/AH A Shaded SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON 32 Mapping Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone X Page 35 (35 of 37) 3 Effective Coastal February 2014 ®®�� /�- 3 36 New Coastal R STARK Limit of Coastal Study k I:N R.i.— . Zone Break - Coastal Study 0 500 1,000 2,Fe000 et Packet Pg. 461 7.2.h COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WITH DES FOR $3,700,416 AND AUTHORIZE WASTEWATER FUNDS TO BE EXPENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was not present for the vote.) Citing the winds this weekend, Councilmember Mesaros asked Mr. Williams to provide a brief update on how Public Works addressed any issues. Mr. Williams explained staff was very busy all weekend, many staff members working overtime to address weather -related issues including worked with PUD after seven major trees fell into power lines. Most of the pump stations were out of power including Lift 1 on Sunset Avenue; all the generators came on and everything worked perfectly including the transfer switches. Councilmember Mesaros echoed kudos My Edmonds New gave Public Works staff. 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. PUBLIC HEARING ON CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE UPDATE Senior Planner Kernen Lien relayed: a • Update started in fall 2014 with review of existing code and BAS • Planning Board and City Council Review in 2015 • Council Adoption January 26th and Mayor veto • December 15, 2015 Code in Exhibit 1 • February 23, 2015 Council scheduled public hearing for tonight to consider potential new cm amendments to draft regulations in Exhibit 1 o Intent of public hearing was to identify universe of potential amendments to the December 15 code in Exhibit 1 Tonight and next steps o Tonight ■ Review proposed City Council amendments ■ Take public comments ■ Staff emailed Council comments received after packet prepared o Next City Council meetings ■ April 5th — Council discuss and decide which proposed amendments to carry forward ■ April 12th — Discuss and refine proposed amendments carried forward on April 5th ■ April 19th — Potential adoption of updated critical area regulations ■ Council previously adopted resolution indicating critical area regulations would be adopted by April 30. ■ May be time tonight to begin discussion of potential amendments Mr. Lien reviewed the potential amendments grouped by topic: ECDC 23.40.220.C.4 — Physically Separated/Functionally Isolated • LA — Require determination to be made by a qualified critical area consultant o Maintains flexibility o Maybe costly for smaller projects • LB — Rename Provision o "Potentially isolated" o Change to "Interrupted Buffer" ■ Defection of buffer: designated area immediately next to and part of a stream or wetland that is an integral part of the stream or wetland ecosystem Council Review/Critical Area Decision Process • 2.A — Include City Council in decision making process for certain critical area decisions Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 462 7.2.h o Could insert public opinion into what is supposed to be opinion based on science o Could create an appearance of fairness issue 2.B - Decision matrix/threshold for which projects would include City Council in decision making process 2.0 - Consider amending the decision process for certain types of critical area decisions Exhibit 2 - Contingent Critical Area Review Procedure (proposed by City Attorney) o Scope: ■ Development of at least 600 square feet within standard buffer - Physically separated/functionally isolated buffer - Restoration project - Wetland/stream buffer reduction ■ Would include also moving physically separated/functionally isolated out of allowed activities and into new provisions in the wetland and stream sections o New Type II-B procedure ■ Public notice (including City Council) ■ Citizen may request public hearing which would escalate the process up to a Type III -A - Public hearing before Hearing Examiner - Requestor must pay a fee in the amount of 50% the difference between Type II-B and Type III -A application fee - Project proponent shall pay the other 50% difference between Type II-B and Type III -A application within 30 days cm o Notice of Final Decision to City Council with opportunity to appeal Hearing Examiner decision through LUPA appeal a o Staff will provide an example at April 5 meeting ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.b.iv - Hazard tree replacement • 3 - Change the required diameter of deciduous replacement trees from 1-inch dbh to 1 to 2 inches dbh o Larger tree not necessarily better for restoration o Smaller relative root ball for larger tree o More difficult for tree to become established Definitinnc • 4.A - Change "normal maintenance of vegetation" from ...trees less than 3-inch dbh to trees less than 4-inch dbh... o Normal maintenance exemption in ECDC 23.40.230.C.2 o Allows the clearing of slightly larger saplings as a critical area exemption • 4.B - Add definition for "Council" o Definition exists in ECDC 21.15.030 • 4.0 - Add definition for Best Available Science o ECDC 23.40.310 -Best Available Science • 4.13 -Move definitions from Part VI to ECDC 23.40.010 after Purpose section ECDC 23.90.040.C.I -Native Vegetation • 5.A -Apply to RS-8 and RS-10 zones o Would greatly expand the area the provision would apply to o RS-12 and RS-20 established because the presence of critical areas o Comprehensive Plan designation ■ Single-family Resource (RS-12, RS-20) ■ Single-family Urban (RS-8, RS-10) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 463 7.2.h • 5.B — Consider different native vegetation percentage for RS-8 and RS-10 zones • 5.0 — Change "...native trees over 10 inches in dbh make up more than 70 percent of the canopy cover" to "...native trees over 6 inches in dbh make up more than 40 percent of the canopy cover." o May trigger the requirements of this provision on more properties than the original proposal o Original proposal based on specific habitat features o Amendment intended to preserve more canopy coverage • May be further refined through development of UFMP Frequently Flooded Areas a • 6 — Do not consider amendments to ECDC 19.00.025 and 21.40.030 at this time d o Frequently flooded areas are critical areas by definition c o Building code regulates development in the flood plain c o Proposed amendment to definition height intended to compensate for requirement to build two feet above base flood elevation 0 c� o Is appropriate to consider at this time a ■ Language in Comprehensive Plan Sustainability Element: "Focusing on short term expedient solutions will only make actions necessary to support sustainability more difficult in the future. For example the areas of environmental issues and climate change, v deferred action now will only make cumulative effects more difficult to resolve in the future. The familiar GMA-based 20-year planning timeframe will not be sufficient — N planning for sustainability must take an even longer view." Council Status Reports • 7 — Require periodic reports to the City Council o Detailed reports can be time consuming and expensive o With existing resources could provide periodic reports with basic data, for example: ■ How many buffer reductions were granted and where ■ Number of critical area determinations ■ Number and general type of physically separated/functionally isolated buffer determinations ■ Provide some sample projects o Clarify report frequency Appendices • 8.A — Insert new Appendix A: Map of Critical Areas in Edmonds o Not regulatory - used for reference purposes only o Maps do not show the exact locations of all critical areas o Subject to change • 8.13 — Insert new Appendix B: Listing of critical areas in Edmonds with buffer widths and category/classification designations o Cost prohibitive o Would have to visit every property in Edmonds o Critical areas not fixed in time or place o Per updated code, critical area determinations and reports only valid for five years (ECDC 23.40.080 and 23.40.090.F) • Could make existing critical area information available on City of Edmonds web map o Do not want people making decisions based on information that may be incorrect Mr. Lien displayed Wetland and Streams; Landslide, Erosion and Seismic Hazards; and Priority Habitat Areas maps for Edmonds. He continued his review of the proposed amendments: Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 464 7.2.h ECDC 20.15.215 Restoration Projects • 9 — Replace draft language in Exhibit 1 with Council proposal o Restoration of historic ecological functions is encouraged ■ Which "historic" period ■ Looking to improve existing conditions o Project proponent proposes buffer width necessary to ensure success ■ Should have some specific parameters o Director reviews and forwards recommendation to City Council ■ Same issues with Council administration of the code as previously discussed ECDC 23.40.040.0 — Areas subject to the provision of the CAO • 10 — Replace to refer to new appendices if appendices are adopted o ECDC 23.40.040.0 notes that the critical area regulations apply regardless of any formal identification ECDC 23.40.040.D — Areas Adiacent to Critical Areas a • 11 — Keep only first sentence and delete the remainder of the section o Amendment would correct discrepancy between ECDC 23.40.040.1) and definition of adjacent in ECDC 23.40.320 v N Councilmember Buckshnis commended Mr. Lien for all his hard work. She has read four different critical r area ordinances and will rely on Shoreline's Ordinance 723 which includes a definition for BAS and others words. She offered to confer with Mr. Lien outside the meeting about definitions. Councilmember Teitzel read from Department of Ecology's January 12, 2016 letter which states, " In recognition of the value of restoration in urban landscapes and the limited restoration opportunities, in 2009 the Washington State Legislature amended the Shoreline Management Act (see RCW 90.58.580) to encourage urban restoration. This amendment allows local jurisdictions to grant relief from shoreline permitting requirements when a restoration project causes a landward shift of the ordinary high water mark. Allowing a reduction in the standard buffer is a similar approach to encouraging restoration; not implementing a restoration project because of inadequate buffers would be an unfortunate loss of opportunities for environmental improvement." He asked Mr. Lien if he agreed with DOE's conclusion. Mr. Lien answered yes, the provision in the CAO is based on a SMA provision. The DOE's letter is in response to one of the December 15, 2015 amendments which would have deleted one of the sections in the restoration projects. DOE's letter supports the language proposed in Exhibit 1. Councilmember Teitzel relayed his understanding allowing and encouraging restoration by reducing the buffer is a win for the environment and for the landowner which should be the City's goal. Mr. Lien agreed, explaining the language in Exhibit 1 states the restoration project must have a net environmental benefit. If the land owner were allowed to reduce the buffer, the project overall would be required to have a net environmental benefit. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Mike Echelbarger, Edmonds, a builder in Edmonds, he relayed his experience with a stream and critical area on an adjacent property and requirement for a study. The study was related to language deleted from ECDC 23.40.090 and 23.40.310 regarding peer review. He described how peer review works in Edmonds; they were required do a report, in this case a watershed analysis. They hired a licensed engineer and paid $10,000 for the report. The report was submitted to the City and the City hired a consultant to do peer review which cost another $10,000. The consultant identified one addition and it Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 7 Packet Pg. 465 7.2.h cost him $1500 to have it included in the report. The bill for peer review from the City was $5,000. He summarized he did not believe in peer review; the cost was nearly three times what it should have cost and he did not believe the results were significantly different. Next, he referred to ECDC 23.40.280 building setbacks, questioning why a setback, essentially a buffer for the buffer, was required in addition to the critical area buffer and how 15-feet was determined. He recommended the City inform its residents; there was little development potential in Edmonds but many people living next to a stream or wetland do not know these changes are being proposed. Justin Heckt, Edmonds, a Students Saving Salmon volunteer, said for the greater environmental health W of Edmonds and surrounding areas, the City needs to be accountable by doing scientific testing and using a reliable and unbiased data collected from critical area. Critical areas contain streams and marshes that add D to the ecosystem and can potentially support a thriving salmon community. These test provide not only c information for health factors such as pH, dissolved oxygen and other factors, they look for potentially c dangerous factors such as E.coli and toxins that can leak into neighborhoods or enter streams and the Marsh. Due to potential threats and the need to defend the environment, the City should look to scientific O organizations such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Washington State i University Extension to guide reports that will be used to make future guidelines. It is important that BAS a be used in conjunction with the data acquired. Not having dependable data could lead to compromised water sources, increased potential infections from bacteria, exposure to pollutants in stormwater runoff. L He suggested focusing attention on the Edmonds Marsh, an estuarine wetland and priority habitat. As the �? Marsh feeds into Puget Sound, it impacts the health of upland waters. Using BAS and all available data N can promote a healthy society that will lead to a sustainable future. r Alan Merns, Edmonds, referred to written materials he provided, a chart showing, 1) bird population trends in his Maplewood neighborhood over 13 years, species and how they have appeared/disappeared, and 2) photos of 20 trees on a property near his home that were marked in late February; he was unsure this meant they were intended to be removed. He expressed concern with the CAO's inaction on bird and wildlife corridors across Edmonds. Although not in a critical area, he monitor birds in his yard; the abundance and biodiversity of bird life has been decreasing since 2005. He has shared his observations during the past five years with Edmonds citizens via presentations at the Bird Fest, Edmonds Floretum, Native Plant Demonstration Garden and a recent course at the Edmonds Community College Creative Retirement Institute. At least 6 of the 75 species are now locally extinct in his area; climate change and tree and shrub removal are likely factors in the decline. Citizens attending his presentations have been alarmed and are employing their own monitoring. When his family moved to Edmonds, there was a corridor of tall trees connecting Yost Park and Maplewood Park where birds including eagles, owls, band - tailed pigeon could be observed. During that time over 100 trees have been cut and not replaced. During its deliberations, he encouraged the Council to be inspired by the increased citizen monitoring and concern. Phil Lovell, Edmonds, said the Council must incorporate support and implement appropriate language necessary to address the potential impacts of sea level rise on the Edmonds Puget Sound waterfront. The new community center currently under design per City Resolution 1313 approved on March 18, 2014, is based on a full 30-foot tall building with a first floor at elevation 15.0 in NAVD 88 datum. This criteria compiles with the current building height regulations and engineering based on BAS. He submitted the briefing document presented to the Council during the senior center's briefing to City Council at its March 4 retreat. He referred to a New York Times article printed in the March 15, 2016 Seattle Times regarding a recently published study in the magazine "Nature Climate Change" which states in part, "rising seas which already endanger coastal communities through tidal floods and storm surges could rise 3 feet and possibly even more." The updated CAO must contain provisions supporting the current design direction of the new waterfront community center so important to the welfare and benefit of the community. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 466 7.2.h Sam Kleven, Edmonds, expressed concern for the City's wildlife including salmon that use streams and wetlands. He cited the importance of protecting wildlife with the help of buffers. To successful complete their lifecycle, salmon need wide enough buffers, sized in accordance with BAS. A buffer is a strip of land that surrounds environmentally fragile streams and wetland; properly sized buffers will help prevent harmful silt and pollutants such as stormwater runoff from entering streams and wetlands. Providing native vegetation and shade to nourish salmon will create a safe haven for species in Edmonds. As well protecting birds, plants, insects and fish native to the City, buffers are also a visual symbol of Edmonds' land stewardship. Restoring urban streams also includes daylighting wherever possible; for example, Willow Creek will be daylighted thanks to the City's efforts to secure funding. The Students Saving Salmon Stream Team at Edmonds-Woodway High School monitors the status of many streams in Edmonds, including Willow Creek. Bringing back salmon runs will require providing incentives for daylighting streams and enhancing buffer areas such as tax reductions. Several incentives can be offered to citizens with regard to buffers via the Puget Sound Urban Resources Partnership, Community Salmon Fund, private stewardship programs and Five Star Restoration Challenge grants. The City currently supports the Student Saving Salmon program, a step in the right direction toward conservation restoration. He encouraged the Council to approve the use of strong language regarding conservation in Edmonds' CAO. Joe Scordino, Edmonds, retired fishery biologist, summarized points in an email he provided the Council. First, he supported including a list of critical areas in Edmonds in the regulations. He questioned N having 90+ pages of regulations but not knowing where they apply. Regulations should be easily readable r by the public and people should know whether they apply to their property. He suggested simply listing Shellabarger Creek, Willow Creek, Edmonds Marsh and others and their buffers. Next, he felt it was important to encourage restoration projects and suggested letting the project proponent dictate the size of x the buffer. For a restoration project to be successful it needs an adequate buffer and the buffer should be w based on the science of the project rather than setting arbitrary buffer widths. With regard to physically separated/functionally isolated buffers, he recommended modifying the language to ensure what is functional isolated is scientifically proven not just based on a regulation. He supported the amended 2 language regarding monitoring and reporting so residents can see what is happening to critical areas. He referred to numerous regulatory structuring comments in his email. With regard to preserving the Marsh, he agreed there was some overlap with the SMP which has not yet been approved. He feared the intersect �j of the two may result in a reduction of the Marsh buffer widths or other changes in the Marsh's protection. He encouraged the Council to look closely at the Marsh when structuring the regulations. N John Reed, Edmonds, speaking on behalf the Alliance of Citizens for Edmonds (ACE), explained a task force of ACE members have considered the 12 proposed amendment as well as ideas and main areas identified for updating in the public hearing notice dated March 1, 2016. The task force also considered the 8 amendments made by Council on December 15, 2015 and the presentation by staff on the 12 amendments on February 23, 2016. Yesterday ACE submitted written comments to the Council, Mayor and Mr. Lien, suggesting changes and voicing support for some aspects of the CAO. ACE's comments are based on the October 19, 2015 redline version of the CAO and in some instances the proposed amendment in the public hearing memo in tonight's material has been revised and incorporates some of the recommendations in their submittal. He highlighted ACE's major recommendations. • Amendment 1: The 2015 Council deleted this new section. ACE recommends the two terms be carefully and completely defined in the CAO definition section. This provisions needs to be coordinated with footprint development and the SMP. Note F footprint of development should include compacted gravel. This was addressed in 2015 Amendment 5 to include legally established buildings, paved roads, driveways and parking lots. ACE recommends it be limited to those items. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 467 7.2.h • Amendment 2: Agree this needs to be limited to major items in physically separated/functionally isolated restoration exemption areas and recommend adding variances. • Amendment 5.A: Agree this is unduly burdensome unless selected area such as parcels falling within a fish a wildlife habitat conservation area can be specifically called out. • Amendment 9: Recommend remove buffer reduction allowance and allow project proponents to propose based on need for special projects. Reduction be limited to 25% and eliminate paragraph B.3 as proposed in 2015 • Note C: Recommend compensatory mitigation be eliminated and actual mitigation be required • Building code and height exceptions: Stand by position taken on January 25, 2016 letter to Council.... He requested the Council keep in mind the primary purpose of the ordinance was to protect critical areas and allow exceptions only when absolutely necessary. Susan Paine, Edmonds, cited the importance of trees to critical areas and the environmental services O they provide, more so in critical areas. She supported preserving existing trees and expressed concern M with allowing the removal of trees smaller than 4 inches or 6 inches as it eliminates much of the a underbrush and prevents trees from maturing. Trees provide slope stabilization and other environmental benefits. She recommended restoration projects be limited to non -development projects to prevent M additional development around sensitive areas which will be important for future generations and salmon v runs. Regarding physically separated/functionally isolated buffers, she did not support including that provision, envisioning a sawtooth system of buffers around sensitive areas, wetlands and streams that cm would be difficult to enforce. With regard to building footprint, she questioned including gravel as part of a building footprint and recommended retaining the old language and not including loose or compacted a gravel. She recommended Council review projects where a buffer reduction of 25% or more is proposed. `m Bob McChesney, Executive Director, Port of Edmonds, said his comments are not related to any specific project or specific property. The local regulations such as the CAO are already restrictive as they pertain to future development opportunities and may devalue private property located in or adjacent to critical areas as well as place new limits on previously accepted private property rights. The Port's mission endorses both economic development and environmental stewardship as core values. The Port is committed to the balance between restoration and protection and renewal and economic vitality to serve future generations. In an ideal world restoration and redevelopment work together; the Port's responsibility is to find reasonable solutions that create new resources, to invest in restoration and support environmental stewardship. The Port is opposed to wider buffers around the Marsh as they would be overly restrictive and counterproductive to Marsh restoration which is a mutual goal. The Port is also concerned with amendments to frequently flooded areas. A contract rezone for Harbor Square, in existence since for many years, stipulates maximum building heights to 35 feet which should be reflected and protected in the new CAO. With regard to how the physically separated/functionally isolated provision works in the real world, he explained a portion of the footprint for the new Jacobsen Marine was in a critical area even though the Burlington Northern railroad runs down the middle, preventing any impacts to the Marsh. Regardless, $11,000 in mitigation was required for impacts that did not exist. He was hopeful whatever amendments are passed do not overly restrict future development opportunities. Eric Thuesen, Edmonds, recommended informing residents if their property is located in a critical area. Many of Edmonds' critical areas are steep slopes, anything over 15%, so it would not be difficult to delineate those. The information is important for a person to know when purchasing property. He expressed concern with the Council's level of involvement in critical area decisions, noting the Council has not been involved in past. Developers spend a considerable amount to hire experts to review projects using BAS to make determinations. Involving the Council, it becomes a political situation and may result in five years getting through the process. He acknowledged LUPA was an option but was expensive for the City as well as the proponent. He recommended the Council not be involved in decisions and instead Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 10 Packet Pg. 468 rely on experts and the Hearing Examiner. Often the Council does not have the expertise and the net effect could be an expensive lawsuit. He agreed with the proposal to increase the height of a house in a wetland. Rondi Nordal, President, Edmonds-Woodway High School Students Saving Salmon Club, urged the Council to take to heart her and other young people's comments as they are the future of Edmonds. As a member of the Stream Team, she places a high value on the environmental health and conscientious protection and restoration of it. This requires the use of BAS as a means of ensuring these projects have a net positive benefit for wildlife habitat, critical because if BAS is not applied, restoration projects may not W focus on key environmental factors or appropriate species. An example of a key factor is embeddedness, a the extent to which silt surrounds or fills rocks, a key factor to stream health. One way to ensure D restoration efforts benefit critical habit is continued monitoring with oversight by qualified officials. a� c Continued monitoring ensures a project progresses successfully and also collects information that can be c used for future updates of the CAO and similar documents. In addition, qualified officials, preferably =a someone with a specialization in the factors being assessed, adds another level of accountability and O potential for success. Considering the current BAS, she questioned whether tradeoffs that allow i development to encroach on critical areas or add impervious surfaces in critical buffer zones should be a encouraged and whether the width of a buffer established to protect critical habitat should be reduced, allowing human interests to come before the greater health of the collective environment. She urged the L Council to consider the best interests of Edmonds when drafting amendments to the CAO. The natural �? beauty of Edmonds is a core identity and reflects the residents' values. She thanked the Council for their N commitment to drafting the best CAO as it will greatly impact the future. r Ferrell Fleming, Edmonds, Executive Director, Senior Center, commented Edmonds pride itself on being a community with a high level of environmental sensitivity and awareness and a commitment to sustainability. BAS demands the City take account of sea level rise. While the magnitude and timeframe of that rise if a matter of considerable debate, sea level rise is a fact. Amendment 6 proposes not including amendments related to frequently flooded areas in the ordinance. Although this amendment may be well- meaning deal with the belief that this matter should be address elsewhere in the code, frequently flooded areas are critical areas by definition and with the growing attention paid to the threat of sea level rise, it would be odd for an environmentally progressive community such as Edmonds with considerable stake in its waterfront, to leave frequently flooded areas out of the CAO update. He urged the Council to defeat this amendment and leave frequently flooded areas in the updated CAO. The City's Strategic Action Plan asked the senior center to build a community center; that can be stopped at any number of points in the process either by action or inaction; consideration of the CAO is one such point. He urged the Council to pay specific attention to framing the language of the CAO update in such a way that they can build a multi -generational center that will serve many generations to come. David Mellitte, Edmonds, a Woodway High School teacher, agreed with the students' comments regarding the impact that critical areas have on the environment. Critical areas are often overlooked unless one steps in it but they are extremely necessary to health and economic benefit. As has been seen in Louisiana, when critical areas are overlooked, they do not act as sponges to soak up overflows from natural changes in weather patterns and cannot act as a buffer. If buffers are intentionally reduced and robust buffers are not required, property owners will face the consequences. He encouraged the Council to maintain a robust effort with regard to critical areas. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, thanked Mayor Earling for his veto which extended discussion regarding the CAO and the four Councilmembers who voted in favor of holding a public hearing. He appreciated Councilmember Teitzel's question regarding buffer modification which would apply to stream restoration. He found that extremely critical and said being overly strict, non -practical would discouraged stream restoration. He pointed out toxic crumb rubber should be addressed in the CAO, noting there are Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 11 Packet Pg. 469 7.2.h no provisions for stormwater with toxic materials that flows into Puget Sound. With regard to replacement trees, he pointed out a 1-inch tree has a better survival rate. He commented definite critical area maps are overly expensive and are impractical. As a board member at the senior center, he preferred to keep the old center to avoid these problems. He did not believe sea level rise would be as high as has been stated and did not think that belonged in the CAO. Doug Swartz, Edmonds, referred to Amendment 9 regarding restoration and requested the Council consider restricting buffer reduction to 25%. Many Edmonds regulations include flexibility; although flexibility sounds good at the outset, the problem is if staff gives into one developer, every other developers or special interest will clamor for the same treatment. Buffer reduction up to 75% or allowing the proponent to recommend the amount of buffer reduction violates the idea of a code. If a project need more than a 25% reduction, the variance process would be appropriate. He urged the Council not to allow up to a 75% buffer reduction without a variance because the end result would be a code that was immaterial and that people could get around. Sue Little, Edmonds, explained after purchasing her home at 806 Dayton Street in January 2007, she was told by the City in October 2011 to daylight the stream on the property. Before she daylighted the a stream, it was in a pipe except for a waterfall. She hired a biologist and was told to complete a SEPA checklist for the work in the onsite stream. The biologist reported the stream is a non -fish bearing L tributary to Shellabarger Creek. She was also required to obtain hydrologist project approval and even �? though her yard has no evidence of a wetland or habitat for endangered, threatened or sensitive species, N she was told to create a berm to hold water in the stream. The work had to be done during low flow r during the summer, 10 months from the time the original problem began with the rockery. Her rockery failed due to the timing. The Fish and Wildlife report stated an annual inspection was required which has never been done by Fish and Wildlife, the biologist or the Edmonds. After five years of misinformation, x lack of communication has created more water problems and expense. She found this very stressful as a w property owner as she cannot control the water coming down hill, the rain or the amount of water in her backyard. After discovering rodents in her crawlspace, 3 feet of water was pumped out, a sump pump and more drainage installed under her home at a cost of $9.000 She summarized throughout this process she 2 has spent approximately $40,000-$45,000 and still needs to spend more for drainage to address water issues. She assured she was an environmentalist and liked water and trees but she did not like water threatening her home. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. He noted the agenda memo and the agenda mentions only a public hearing. He agreed discussion was appropriate but questioned whether the Council wanted to take action on the amendments tonight. Councilmember Mesaros recalled Mr. Lien's slides recommended discussion on April 5 and asked Mr. Lien to clarify. Mr. Lien agreed the agenda memo identified April 5 to narrow the potential amendments. As there are no other items on tonight's agenda, he suggested the Council have further discussion tonight. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the agenda memo states potential action and asked if the Council could begin taking action on the amendments. City Attorney Jeff Taraday responded the agenda memo limitations are more of a Council protocol issue than a legal issue; there is no legal issue with the Council narrowing down the amendments tonight. Councilmember Tibbott commented it may be worthwhile to consider amendments the Council can agree on and address the remaining amendments at the next meeting. Council President Johnson thanked everyone who participated in the public hearing particularly the Students Saving Salmon, noting it was good to hear from young people in the community. She assured Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 12 Packet Pg. 470 7.2.h the Council will consider the written comments that have been submitted and citizens are welcome to make comments regarding the specific amendments. As Mr. Lien mentioned, the Council wanted to create the universe of potential amendments for the public hearing. The CAO is a very complex, complicated ordinance and the Council should carefully consider how to move forward. She agreed with proposed the schedule with adoption by the end of April. Councilmember Teitzel appreciated Ms. Little's comments about her experience. If a citizen invests thousands to daylight a stream for the benefit of the environment, it should be a positive experience for the citizen and the environment. He supported establishing the CAO so that a citizen has reasonable use of their property at the same time restoring and enhancing the environment to the extent possible and avoiding Ms. Little's experience whenever possible. Councilmember Nelson relayed his excitement to begin working on the amendments, preferring to begin with the amendments that Councilmembers disagree on. Council President Johnson commented on the importance of the Council considering the comments made during the public hearing, fearing that taking action tonight would be premature. She preferred to read the record more thoroughly, consider what has been said tonight and return at a future meeting. Councilmember Mesaros was not certain which amendments the Council agreed on; he preferred to begin with Amendment 1. N T T Councilmember Buckshnis suggested delaying Amendment 2 until the April 5 when the City Attorney will provide information and Mr. Lien will provide an example. She suggested Amendment 11was an easy one, simply cleaning up the language. u Councilmember Teitzel did not advocate for the Council's involvement in the administration's decision - making process; Councilmembers are legislators and set policy, the administration acts on the policy. If a decision was made not to have Council take action on exceptions and in 1-2 years the Council found the legislative intent was not being carried out, he asked if the Council could reopen the CAO to make it more restrictive and possibly have the Council involved or did the Council have to wait 7 years to make an amendment Mr. Taraday responded the Council could always clarify ambiguities in the code at a later date if an ambiguity leads to decisions by the Hearing Examiner that the City Council did not contemplated when adopting the code. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said the Council could also include something in the CAO and if it didn't work, amend it. Mr. Taraday agreed that could also be done; whatever the Council adopts in 2016, the Council was not forced to live with the 2016 CAO unchanged for 8 years. The Council can amend and clarify it as necessary. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the Council could modify it in 2017. Mr. Taraday answered yes. Main Motion #1 COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 11 AS PROPOSED. Mr. Taraday clarified Councilmember Tibbott was seeking Council consensus to include Amendment 11 in the CAO. He advised the Council was not adopting anything tonight. Action on Main Motion #1 MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING NO. Main Mntinn ;t2 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 13 Packet Pg. 471 COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 3. Councilmember Mesaros asked if 2 inch dbh replacement trees will be required if the amendment is approved. Mr. Lien responded if the amendment is approved, the required replacement must be between 1-2 inches; a 1-inch tree would still be allowed. Councilmember Mesaros asked whether 3-inch tree would be allowed. Mr. Lien answered yes. Councilmember Mesaros clarified the minimum was 1 inch. Councilmember Teitzel asked what was gained with the amendment as the size of the replacement tree was at a person's discretion. Mr. Lien said the vast majority of proposals will propose to plant a 1-inch tree. Action on Main Motion #2 UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS, BUCKSHNIS AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS MESAROS AND TEITZEL VOTING NO Councilmember Teitzel proposed changing the title of ECDC 23.40.220.C.4, Amendment LB, Physically separated/functionally isolated to physically separated/interrupted buffer. Mr. Lien clarified his 2 suggestion was to replace the entire phrase "physically separated/functionally isolated" with "interrupted buffer." N T Main Motion #3 r COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO a CHANGE THE TITLE OF ECDC 23.40.220.C.4. TO INTERRUPTED BUFFER. Mr. Lien said changing the entire section to interrupted buffer may require changing other references to physically separated/functionally isolated throughout the CAO. Action on Main Motion #3 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Main Motion #4 COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE 4-INCH DBH IN AMENDMENT 4.A. Council President Johnson referred to comment from Susan Paine regarding the importance of brush and small young trees. Changing maintenance to allow removal of trees 4-inches dbh or smaller was not taking into consideration other vegetation that may be useful in stabilizing a slope or providing habitat. She suggested Ms. Paine's comments were worthy of additional consideration. She interpreted this change to basically allow clear cutting of any steep slope that had 4 inch or less dbh vegetation. Councilmember Mesaros responded he did to interpret this to allow clear cutting. He read it to allow removal of vegetation as part of normal maintenance of vegetation around a critical area. He was certain a property owner wanted to protect the slope as much as the City did. He recommended approving Amendment 4.A and allow property owners to take responsibility for their land. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification. Mr. Lien explained this definition refers to a specific exemption in 23.40.230 (page 22 of Exhibit 1), an exemption allowed for operation, maintenance or repair. A statement was added that reads, "Operation and maintenance also includes normal maintenance of vegetation performed in accordance with best management practices, provided that such management actions are part of regular and ongoing maintenance, do not expand further into the critical area, are not the result of an expansion of the structure or utility, and do not directly impact an endangered Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 14 Packet Pg. 472 7.2.h or threatened species." A definition of normal maintenance of vegetation was also added, "normal maintenance of vegetation means removal of shrubs, non -woody vegetation and trees less than 4 inch dbh that occurs at least every other year. Maintenance also may include tree topping that has been previously approved by the City in the past five years." Another possible provision would be within the allowed activity section, 23.40.220.C.7 (page 19 of Exhibit 1) that addresses select vegetation removal activities and includes a list of evasive and noxious weeds. Amendments to this section would limit the amount of clearing to an area 1500 square feet over a 3 year period. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how this would apply to the two incidents on one property where property owners cut trees on a hillside in a critical area. Mr. Lien answered the most common is alders that sprout on a property. Alders are a pioneering species and can come up by the thousands on a site. The exemption would prevent alders from taking over the site. The site Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was referring to was subject to restoration. Alders can overwhelm a restoration project. The exemption would allow a property owner to control the alders. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented it was not related only to alders. Mr. Lien agreed, alders were only an example that this would apply to; other trees sprout in a similar manner. Councilmember Mesaros relayed his understanding if the amendment were approved, the regulations M would not allow a clear cut. Mr. Lien agreed the regulations would not allow a clear cut; it was related to L normal maintenance of vegetation on an ongoing regular basis. �? N Councilmember Buckshnis asked why 4 inches was preferable to 3 inches. Councilmember Mesaros r recalled a citizen presenting a 3-inch and a 4-inch log to illustrate there was not much difference between 3 inches and 4 inches. Q- Action on Motion #4 MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING NO. Main Motion #5 COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY TIBBOTT TO APPROVE AMENDMENT LA. Councilmember Nelson explained this amendment provided a balance between allowing some flexibility while requiring a qualified critical area consultant to make the determination whether it is in fact a separated and isolated buffer. Councilmember Mesaros referred to Mr. Echelbarger's comments regarding peer review and asked whether this amendment would require peer review. Mr. Lien answered that was elsewhere in the regulations. The amendment would not necessarily require peer review but it could. One of the instances when the City requires peer review is when there are multiple critical area reports that do not agree. In the instance referenced by Mr. Echelbarger, staff did not feel they had the expertise to review the critical area reports so it was sent to a consultant with that expertise. Another area that always requires peer review is development within the earth subsidence landslide hazard area in North Edmonds. He summarized there are a few instances where this amendment may require peer review. Councilmember Mesaros referred to Ms. Little's comments and the investments she has made when trying to do the right thing that has not turned out well for her. If decisions are made to reduce the buffer, he supported having good reason to do so and having expertise but did not want the property owner to go through a series of events that complicates their lives rather than helps them with their property and helps the City. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 15 Packet Pg. 473 7.2.h Mr. Taraday pointed out a portion of Amendment LA overlaps with Amendment 2; Amendment LA includes a process involving a recommendation to the City Council and Amendment 2 includes a different process. An earlier Council comment recommended deferring Amendment 2 to a later date. Councilmember Buckshnis said if Amendment LA was related to Amendment 2, she preferred to first hear from the City Attorney on April 5. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his understanding Amendment LA was an opportunity to agree with what was already proposed in the CAO and was one of greatest opportunities to allow for development that would improve environmental effectiveness in the critical area. He was supportive of Amendment LA and looked forward to a further understanding of Amendment 2. Action on Main Motion #5 COUNCILMEMBER NELSON WITHDREW AMENDMENT LA WITH AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember Teitzel expressed concern with the wording of Amendment LA, which states the director a will require the applicant to provide a site assessment and functional analysis report by a qualified critical E area consultant. His concern was this removes staff almost entirely from the decision. He envisioned a property downslope from a stream and did not support requiring a report when it was absolutely clear t� there was no impact on the nearby stream or wetland. He found Amendment LA too restrictive and felt it should be reworded. cm T T �r Main Motion #6 COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO REMOVE AMENDMENT 4.C, ADDING A DEFINITION FOR BEST AVAILABLE SCIENCE. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the definition is already contained in ECDC 21.40.310. Action on Main Motion #6 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Main Motion ;t7 COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 4.1), MOVE DEFINITIONS FROM PART VI TO ECDC 24.40.010 AFTER PURPOSE SECTION. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the definitions should be at the beginning which is done in other cities' CAO for readability. Mr. Lien commented moving definitions from Part IV will not move the section related to BAS which has its own section describing characteristics of BAS, not a definition. He clarified Section 23.40.310 BAS is not contained in the definitions; the motion is to move the definitions contained in Part IV, 23.40.320 to 23.40.010, moving the definitions from the end of the general section to the beginning. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if Mr. Lien could bring back the amended text next week. Mr. Lien relayed his understanding the Council was reducing the amendments via changes discussed tonight so there were fewer to consider on April 5. He did not intend to make any of the changes approved tonight and would incorporate all the proposed amendments following the April 5 meeting into a new draft code for the April 12 meeting. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas feared it would be difficult to follow on April 5 if some changes were approved tonight and not incorporated into the document. Mr. Lien offered to create a new draft for the April 5 meeting although moving the definitions would require renumbering everything which would be very confusing. Mr. Taraday suggested when the COA returns to Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 16 Packet Pg. 474 7.2.h the Council on April 5, staff categorize the amendments the Council has already acted on and amendments that have not yet been acted on. Mr. Lien agreed with Mr. Taraday's suggestion. Councilmember Mesaros asked the intent of Amendment 4.B. Councilmember Buckshnis answered it relates to Amendment 2. Councilmember Teitzel agreed it made sense to move the definition to the beginning as it will help the reader to have the definitions as they read the CAO. With regard to BAS, he suggested referencing in the list of definitions where BAS is in the document. Mr. Lien commented there was already motion to a) remove Amendment 4.C. Councilmember Teitzel clarified his suggestion was to reference the section on a BAS as the definition of BAS. D a� c Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Teitzel's suggestion. c L Councilmember Mesaros clarified Councilmember Teitzel's suggestion; he was not recommending the O language regarding BAS be included in the definitions, he was recommending including a reference to i BAS in the definitions. a Amendment #1 to Main Motion #7 L COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, V TO AMEND TO ADD REFERENCE CLARIFYING IN THE DEFINITION LIST WHERE A READER MIGHT FIND INFORMATION ON BEST AVAILABLE SCIENCE. r T Action on Amendment #1 AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Action on Main Motion #7 as amended MAIN MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. It was the consensus of the Council to defer further discussion and action on the amendments to April 5. 7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling advised the new Economic Development Commission (EDC) has been formed and thanked Councilmembers for their appointments. The EDC is a fabulous group of people; their first meeting is March 30. The Mayors Pedestrian Safety Committee will meet for the first time on April 5. Mayor Earling reminded of the Snohomish County Cities dinner on Thursday; he is unable to attend. 8. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Nelson referred to comments regarding the subject of sea level rise. He was excited there was so much interest in the topic and Edmonds, as well as other communities along the Washington coast including Seattle, Olympia, King County, Bellingham and Bremerton and Kitsap Council have looked at comprehensive ways to address sea level rise. If the City takes on this challenge, which he believed the City should, we should look at ways to adopt, prepare and fight. The reality is all the modeling is over an 84-year time frame and for the first 34 years of that modeling, the damage is already done. Seas will rise regardless of whether habits or lifestyles change. Beyond that point, from 2050 to 2100, there are things the City can do to impact sea level rise and he recommended being proactive not just reactive. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas apologized for arriving late; she was at Health District's annual retreat until 6:45. The Health District is struggling with cuts and deciding which programs to cut. One of the proposals is for the Health District to no longer serve the WIC program and subcontract it instead. There Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 15, 2016 Page 17 Packet Pg. 475