Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2016-06-14 City Council - Full Agenda-1683
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. o Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 JUNE 14, 2016, 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2016 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2016 3. Approval of claim checks. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS STUDY ITEMS 1. Students Saving Salmon Presentation (30 min.) 2. Presentation of a Change Order with Razz Construction, Inc. For the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project (10 min.) 3. Presentation on the Stormwater Code Update (30 min.) 4. Discussion of Draft Ordinance Amending ECC 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System) to Clarify the Definition of Misuse and to Amend the Penalty Provisions (5 min.) 5. Discussion of Draft Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05 to Add Certain Penalty Provisions Relating to Animal Bites (5 min.) 6. Discussion of Draft Ordinance Amending ECC 8.32 to Add Inattentive Driving Section (5 min.) 7. Presentation of bid results for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection Improvements Project (15 min.) 8. Presentation of a Supplemental Agreement with KPG for the 236th St. SW Walkway project. (10 min.) 9. Repeal ECC 10.5 Dissolving Library Board (10 min.) 10. Edmonds City Code Chapter 10.95 - Citizens' Tree Board (15 min.) MAYOR'S COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1) RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. Edmonds City Council Agenda June 14, 2016 Page 1 ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda June 14, 2016 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2016 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 06-07-2016 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 3 4.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES June 7, 2016 The City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. Elected Officials Present Kristiana Johnson, Council President Mike Nelson, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Dave Earling, Mayor Others Present Scott Passey, City Clerk 1. CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS FOR CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS The City Council adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room and met with Mr. William Phipps, a candidate for confirmation to the Citizens' Tree Board, to discuss his desire and qualifications to serve on the Board. 2. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 4 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2016 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 06-07-2016 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 5 4.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES June 7, 2016 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember 1. ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT c Phil Williams, Public Works Director m Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer c Rob English, City Engineer t� Leif Bjorback, Building Official o Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney o Scott Passey, City Clerk 00. Andrew Price, Legislative/Council Assistant a Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator c Jeannie Dines, Recorder City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Fraley-Monillas. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item 1 be removed from the Consent Agenda so that she could abstain from the vote. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT DIRECT DEPOSIT, CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS 3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM CHRIS AND LESLIE MCGINNESS ($58,740.00), AND G. CHRIS GRADWOHL ($6,725.97) 4. 2015 SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT CLOSEOUT Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 6 4.2.a 5. CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENT OF WILLIAM PHIPPS TO THE CITIZENS' TREE BOARD 6. APRIL MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT 7. ACCEPTANCE OF THE FIVE CORNERS ROUNDABOUT PROJECT 8. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.16.040 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE (ECC); AMENDING THE SPEED LIMIT ALONG A SECTION OF SR-104 9. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF THE 2017 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT 10. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BHC CONSULTANTS FOR THE 2017 SEWERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT 11. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH COMCAST FOR THE UNDERGROUND CONVERSION OF OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE WITHIN THE 76TH AVE W AND 212TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LIMITS 12. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH WAVE BROADBAND FOR THE UNDERGROUND CONVERSION OF OVERHEAD UTILITY Q' a LINES WITHIN THE 76TH @ 212TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Q LIMITS r 0 M 13. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH JAMES G. MURPHY TO SELL SURPLUS CITY EQUIPMENT 14. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE (1) NEW CATERPILLAR 420F2 HRC BACKHOE LOADER FROM NC MACHINERY. WASHINGTON STATE CONTRACT #00410 AND AUTHORIZATION TO SURPLUS THEIR EXISTING BACKHOE, UNIT #18, AT AUCTION ITEM 1: APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 24, 2016 COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE ITEM 1. MOTION CARRIED (5-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINED. 4. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS MUSIC4LIFE PROCLAMATION Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring June as Music4Life Month in the City of Edmonds and encouraging citizens to donate any lovingly used musical instruments they may have to www.Music4Life.orand show what financial support they can to this fine home-grown organization. Mayor Earling presented the proclamation to David Endicott, Co -Founder of Music4Life. Mr. Endicott two years ago, with the blessing of Edmonds School District Nick Brossoit, the Music4Life program began for Edmonds School District. During the 2014-2015 school year, the program provided 20 ready -to -play instruments to Edmonds schools with an estimated retail value of $15,430. Since September 1, 2016 of this school year, they delivered another 33 music instruments with an estimated retail value of $28,680, far outpacing the 2014-15 school year and the year is not yet over. Included in the instruments is a very rare Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 7 4.2.a violin now being played by the concert master in an Edmonds High School orchestras. Public support is important to fund instrument repairs; support is provided by the Hazel Miller Foundation, the Rotary Club of Edmonds, First Choice Health and others. He encouraged the public to donate instruments as well as make financial donations to repair instruments. 2. SNOHOMISH COUNTY TOURISM BUREAU PRESENTATION Development Services Director Patrick Doherty introduced the presentation by Snohomish County County Tourism Bureau (SCTB), explaining Edmonds has a great collaboration with SCTB in promoting tourism. The City provides an annual contribution of $6,000 to the SCTB from Lodging Tax funds. He introduced Amy Spain, Executive Director of the Snohomish County Tourism Bureau, who presented the SCTB 2015 Annual Report. She described the importance of tourism to economic development; visitors to Washington spent $20.7 billion in 2015, accounting for $1.2 billion in local/state tax revenues and creating 170,500 jobs. She displayed a drawing illustrating the impacts of tourism on many different aspects of the community. She commented on the State's lack of a Tourism Office: • All other states have some form of state funding and/or involvement t3 • Washington Tourism Alliance is not a sustainable organization using a membership -funded model o o Receive funds from members and $500,000 bridge funding from the legislature to keep the > website open and distribute the Visitors Guide. ° • Legislation was introduced in Olympia in 2015 to create a state tourism funding program - not a passed • Legislation will be introduced in 2017 to create a state tourism funding program o M She provided a comparison of competitor states' budgets: • Washington $481,000 (WTA 2013-2015 budget) • Alaska $17 million • Idaho $7 million a, • Oregon $12 million • California $50 million • Nevada $15 million • Montana $12 million c • Wyoming $13 million 3 v • Utah $14 million • Arizona $13 million L o • Colorado $15 million co • New Mexico $7 million c N • Vancouver BC $53 million tZ She described the impact of travel to the local economy: • Overnight travelers to Washington State (staying in commercial lodging) o Average 2.2 people per travel party o Stay 2.5 nights o Spend $477 per travel party per day • Overnight travelers to Snohomish County (staying in commercial lodging) o Average 2.1 people per travel party o Stay 2.1 nights o Spend $360 per travel party per day Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 8 4.2.a Ms. Spain displayed a bar graph illustrating the impact of travel to local economy, day traveler compared to overnight travelers. She described the effect of tourism in Snohomish County: • Visitor spending in Snohomish County is $1 billion/year, up 1.8% from previous year o Restaurants: $308 million o Transportation and Fuel: $146 million o Retail Stores: $136 million o Accommodations: $141 million o Recreation and entertainment: $136 million o Grocery stores: $63 million • 10,750 Jobs • $273.9 million payroll • $21.1 million local taxes • $50.9 million state taxes Ms. Spain provided a brief overview of SCTB's accomplishments in 2015: • Generated 4,577 requests for information from ads • Website visitation up 3% - over 228,000 unique visitors • Achieved over $296,000 of free media coverage, up 8% • 22,091 definite and 9,406 tentative group and convention room nights were processed in 2015 representing $44.3 million in economic impact • Visitor centers served 38,000 visitors. Countywide centers served 107,651 visitors • Tourism spending and economic impact of tourism in Snohomish County was $1 billion —up 1.8% Q • Hotel occupancy levels were down 2% to 70.9%; ADR was up 4.3% leading to an increase in r RevPar of 2.2% M • Hotel/motel tax collections were up 12.9% She reviewed convention, sports and group tour sales and services, explaining ads generate leads, support branding and generate interest in Snohomish County as a meeting/event destination: • 22 trade shows o Packaged Travel o Sports Marketing o Consumer Travel o Meeting and Events 0 237 direct leads 0 199 groups assisted • Distributed 3,886 group tour, convention and sports events collateral materials at 22 trade shows and 5 sales missions • 5 sales missions to Vancouver BC, Olympia, Seattle, Indianapolis and Colorado Springs o 31 new leads for hotels and attractions o Distribution of 76 guides • 18 familiarization tours conducted 0 237 direct leads 0 199 groups assisted • Bar graph of tentative, definite and total room nights for 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 o Group tour, meeting and event planner bids were prepared which resulted in 22,091 total definite room nights o Additional pending bookings at year end totaled 9,406 room nights o Totaling 31,497 room nights • Bar graph of economic impact of room nights 2011-2015 - $44,252,079 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 9 4.2.a Tammy Dunn, Sports Development Director, SCTB, explained Snohomish County is a premier sports destination, generating $35.6 million in economic impact from international, national, regional and local events. She relayed recognitions and awards: • Sports Events Magazine Readers' Choice Award — 5-time winner • Champions of Economic Impact in Sports Tourism Ms. Spain advised Ms. Dunn received the NSC Game Changer Award and the Women in Sports Tourism - inaugural recipient. Ms. Spain reported on tourism development: • 4,577 requests for information from ads • Online presence • Print publications have online version • New E-Newsletters • Website visitation up 3% • Over 6,400 visits to RoomsAtPar and StayShopAndSave websites • New collateral o East County Backroads o Hiking guide o Golf in Snohomish County • 85,000 copies of the official visitor guide distributed • 6 issues of StoryLine were mailed to over 1400 travel writers with each issue She commented on public relations and media: • 6 media fam tours for travel writers • 34 press released • 92 media pitches • 56 articles • $296,518 free media coverage • Social Media: Flickr, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Pinterest, You Tube • 3 television ads aired She described visitor information services: Implementing strategic tourism plan initiatives o Traditional advertising in Alderwood Mall o Ambient advertising at Everett Mall o Electronic kiosks at Future of Flight, Lynnwood Convention Center and Tulalip Resort Mobile VICs operating at events and festivals Visitor snapshot: 0 76% from more than 50 miles away ■ 4% from other WA counties ■ 32% from other states ■ 40% from other counties ■ 24% from local area o Served 107,651 visitor countywide She described industry education • Conducted three countywide tourism related programs • Industry Training Tools o Monthly hotel hot sheet o Tourism Industry monthly tours Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 10 T 0 M 4.2.a Councilmember Nelson asked how the economic impact of tourism is calculated. Ms. Spain answered they use a number of different measurement tools; the Destination Marketing Association International tracks cities and provides an economic impact figure for a convention attendee, a leisure traveler, etc. That is overlaid with information from the National Association of Sports Commission regarding what a sports team brings to a community, overlaid with the Dean Runyan Report which is specific to Washington State as well as the Smith Travel Research Report that reports average daily occupancy rates and revenue for hotels in Snohomish County. Councilmember Nelson referred to the report that overnight visitors spend four times the amount a day visitor does and asked how that data was tracked. Ms. Spain answered that data is provided by Dean Runyan & Associates, the company that provides visitor spending information in Washington State; they have a proprietary method of determining spending. c Councilmember Nelson referred to the 4,577 requests for general information from ads and asked what they r learn from the types of requests that can be applied moving forward. Ms. Spain answered those are requests for leisure travel information, requesting a print visitor guide or a special interest guide. With regard to meetings, events and groups, they are constantly learning what they are looking for with regard to 'o convention space, field space, court space and targeting their efforts to those that can be accommodated. 0 0 Councilmember Tibbott asked what cities in Snohomish County receive most overnight stays. Ms. Spain answered SCTB receives county data not individual city data. South county has more hotels than north county; Lynnwood has more hotel rooms than any other city in Snohomish County. Due to their location a on the south end of the county, Edmonds, Bothell, etc. tend to receive overflow when when Seattle hotels are full. r 0 M Councilmember Tibbott asked what type of accommodations guests are seeking, whether it was 4 or 5 star hotels, bed & breakfasts, etc. Ms. Spain answered the Tulalip Resort is the only 4-star hotel in Snohomish County and has a very high occupancy rate, often pushing business to other hotels. All the other hotels in Snohomish County are 3-star. Airbandb and VRBO are beginning to impact the B&B market and hotel stays. a� Councilmember Teitzel referred to the report that tourism spending in Snohomish County was up 1.8% and m m asked how that compared statewide. Ms. Spain offered to provide that information, noting state travel is also up. c U Council President Johnson said she looks forward to this presentation every year and remembers Ms. Spain's mantra, tourism is economic development. Although she understood most of the information was p aggregate to Snohomish County, she asked how Edmonds could increase sports tourism or general tourism to increase economic development. Ms. Spain said Mr. Doherty and Program Coordinator Cindi Cruz have N held a series of workshops this spring with community members and Kitsap County and Lynnwood to c develop partnerships. SCTB is a partner in those workshops and also participates to help those organizations c work collectively and cooperative to get more bang for buck from their efforts. With regard to sports tourism, Ms. Dunn recalled meeting with Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite c a� z about four years ago when they toured the City, looking for sports niche. She continues to look for unique cc events to hold in Edmonds. One possibility is a criterium, a downtown bicycle race, similar to the race in Q Ballard. That requires finding the right event owner and working with the City. The SCTB has a great relationship with Edmonds Parks. With regard to Ms. Spain's comments regarding the impacts that Airbandb and VRBO are having, Councilmember Mesaros suggested rather than viewing those as something taking away, it is a shift in how Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 11 4.2.a people around the world think. He suggested considering how to track and encourage it. Ms. Spain said Airbandbs began collecting room tax within the last couple months. Until that time, SCTB was not promoting them at all because they were taking away. She referred to a meeting this morning with east Snohomish County, which is woefully short of lodging opportunities, to determine how many Airbandbs and VRBOs are operating in that area. There is an effort to contact Airbandbs and VRBOs to establish a list and promote them on the website. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the brochures are fabulous. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Hank Landau, Edmonds, a member of the Edmonds Bicycle Group and the Mayor's Climate Change Z Committee, reported there were a number of events last month which was Bicycle Month. He thanked the c City and staff for all they have done to support those programs. Six years ago he requested Council support for the Basics of Bicycling Program, intended to teach young children in the Edmonds School District how 2 to safety ride bicycles to improve safety, improve health, reduce obesity and diabetes and interact better with traffic. Edmonds and several surrounding communities endorsed the program; fundraising followed with cooperation from the Edmonds School District Cascade Bicycle Club and and the Edmonds Bicycle v Group and with financial support from donors including the Hazel Miller Foundation and Verdant. The c program has served thousands of children to date and is currently serving 15 elementary schools, 4 middle schools and they hope to go to the high schools soon to train for bicycle races. He gave special appreciation o to the PE teachers who implement the program. Another program the City has been instrumental in is Bike a to Health, formerly Bike -Link, which promotes interconnectivity and improvements to routes that connect a Edmonds to surrounding communities. City staff has also been very supportive of Safe Routes to Schools; c the City has successfully obtained grants for sidewalks and walkways leading to schools including 220t' Street, 228', and 238'. He thanked the City for their support on Bike Everywhere Day. ,;, Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented it was nice to see the new arrangement on the dais. Next, he recalled the Council approved a moratorium on crumb rubber but it has a short life. To educate the Council about new information related to crumb rubber, he suggested contacting the principals of the citizen groups who provided comment to Council and ask them to give a presentation regarding what's new in crumb rubber, new regulations, organizations that have decided stop using crumb rubber, etc. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2017-2022 SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss presented the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): • RCW requires that each city update their TIP by July 1 • Document contains all significant transportation projects that a city possibly plans to undertake in next six years • City of Edmonds policy: TIP financially constrained first three years • Federal grants, state grants and local funds are programmed as revenue sources for TIP projects He identified completed/soon to be completed project in 2016: • 220th St. SW Overlay from 84th Ave. to 76th Ave • 228' St SW Corridor Safety Improvements • Hwy 99 Lighting (Phase 3) 220t' St SW to 212th St SW • 238' Street SW walkway from100t' Ave W to 104t' Ave W Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 7 Packet Pg. 12 4.2.a • Citywide protective/permissive left turn traffic signal conversions He reviewed scheduled construction projects in 2017: 84' Ave W Overlay from 220' St SW to 212' St SW • Project Description o Pavement overlay o Curb ramp upgrades o Mid -block crossing improvements (near Chase Lake Elementary) o New project in TIP • Funding o Federal Grant $691,000 o Local $249,000 • Schedule o Design Spring ` 17 o Construction Summer ' 17 76" Ave W (a, 212" St SW Intersection improvements • Project description o Add left turn lane for NB and SB movements on 76th Av. W o Add right turn lanes for SB, NB, and EB movements o Improve intersection delay o Add bike lanes / wider sidewalk o Various utility upgrades (including conversion of overhead utility lines to underground) • Schedule o Start of Construction July ` 16 o Construction Completion Spring ` 17 • Funding o Estimated total project cost ■ Design $582,000 ■ ROW $789,000 ■ Construction $4,966,000 o Funding sources ■ Federal Grant secured: $3,960,000 ■ Local Funds (Fund 112, Utility): $2,377,000 Trackside warning system/quiet zone at Dayton St & Main St Railroad Crossings • Project description o Install Wayside Horns at (2) Railroad Crossings to reduce noise level (within Downtown Edmonds) created during daily train crossings • Schedule o Construction completion 2017 • Funding o General Fund Transfer: $300,000 236' St SW Walkway from SR-104 to Madrona School • Project description 0 600 feet of sidewalk along 236th St from SR-104 to school entrance o Pavement Overlay o Bicycle sharrow markings o Stormwater upgrades • Schedule o Completion of Design 2016 o Construction Completion 2017 Funding Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 13 T 0 M 4.2.a ■ Secured Safe Routes to School grant $494,000 ■ Local Funds (Fund 422) $250,000 ■ General Fund: $202,000 Citywide Bicycle Improvements (formerly known as Bike -Link) • Project description o Complete critical missing links of bicycle's network (bike lanes / sharrows in Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, and Edmonds) o Bicycle route signage and parking at key locations o Bicycle education and outreach • Status/Schedule o Design Completion Fall 2016 o Construction Completion Spring 2017 • Funding o Secured Verdant grant (Lynnwood, MLT, and Edmonds) o $1.9 Million (- $737,000 allocated to Edmonds) Other projects in 2017-2022 TIP • New projects / not identified in 2016-2021 TIP o Corridor Intersection/Improvements ■ Hwy 99 from 216' St SW to 224t' St SW o Pavement rating study ■ Determine future overlay projects (based on pavement condition of all City Streets) ■ Previous study completed in 2013 o Citywide pedestrian crossing enhancements ■ 9 crossings • Preservation / safety / capacity projects o Annual street preservation (REET & General Fund) o Signal upgrades ■ Puget Dr. @ OVD (2020- 20201) ■ 238th St. SW @ 100th Ave. W (2020) ■ Main St. @ 3rd Ave. (2021 - 2022) o Intersection Improvements ■ 220th St. SW @ 76th Ave. W (2017 -2020) ■ 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W (2020-2022) ■ Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW (2020-2022) ■ Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW (2020-2022) ■ Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW (2020-2022) ■ SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W (2020-2021) ■ SR-104 @ 238th St. SW (2020-2021) Non -motorized transportation projects ■ Sunset Ave. ■ 4th Ave. Corridor Enhancement Walkway ■ Walkway projects near schools / parks - Maplewood Dr. Walkway - Elm Way Walkway - Walnut St. Walkway ■ Short Walkway projects - 2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St. - 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W ■ Minor Sidewalk Program ■ ADA Curb Ramp Improvements (2017-2020) (2020-2022) (2017-2020) (2017-2019) (2020) (2020) (2020) (2017-2022) (2017-2022) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 14 T 0 M 4.2.a Mr. Hauss provided a summary of secured transportation grants over the last four years: Project Name ear grant secured Grant Type Total Grant Amount 2281 St SW Corridor Improvement project 2013 Federal/State $ 5,934,000 236'h St SW, 238'h St SW & 15'h Ave W Walkway projects (2013) Federal/State $ 1,459,000 ADA curb ramp upgrades along 3' Ave S (2013) Federal $ 90,000 School Zone Flashing Beacons (2013) Federal $ 37,500 Bike -Link 2014 Local $ 737,000 220'h St SW Overlay from 84'h Ave to 76'h Ave (2014) Federal $ 780,000 76'h Ave @ 121th St Intersection Improvements (20140 Federal $ 3,020,000 Waterfront At -Grade Crossing Study (2015) State $ 500,000 238'h Walkway from SR104 to Hwy 99 State $ 348,000 84'h Ave W Overlay from 220'h St SW to 212'h St W 2016 Federal $ 691,000 Total Amount —$13,500,000 He provided a summary of recently submitted transportation grants: Project Grant Type Total Request 80'h Ave W Walkway from 212'h to 206'h Pedestrian and Bicycle $ 210,000 Maplewood Dr Walkway from Main to 200'h Pedestrian and Bicycle $ 230,000 Elm Way Walkway from 8'h to 9'h Safe Routes to Schools $ 789,000 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancement Safe Routes to Schools $ 1,310,000 Edmonds Multimodal Grade Separation Project FAST Act $79,390,000 Total Request $81,929,000 Mr. Hauss relayed staff s recommendation that the City Council approve the TIP. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed compliments she has received about the 22811i project. She inquired about the upgrade to traffic signals such as at Puget Drive & Olympic View Drive. Mr. Hauss answered the signal at Puget Drive/Olympic View Drive signal is on a span wire and has no mast arms; the existing signal would be upgraded to install mast arms on all approaches. The signal poles are 25-30 years old and need to be upgraded. Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about the Safe Routes to Schools grants. Mr. Hauss referred to a list of non -motorized transportation project list, advising they are either Safe Routes to Schools or Pedestrian and Bicycle program grants. For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Hauss identified walkway that were funded with federal Safe Routes to Schools grants and State TIB grants. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the Pavement Rating Study, recalling one of the highest priorities in the Strategic Action Plan (SAP) was the pavement condition. He asked if the Pavement Rating Study will be completed in 2017. Mr. Hauss answered yes, it takes about six months to complete. Councilmember Teitzel asked if it would consider all the streets in Edmonds. Mr. Hauss answered yes. Councilmember Teitzel asked what effect the study will have on prioritization decisions. Mr. Hauss answered the study will provide a pavement condition index (PCI) of 0-100 for minor arterials, collector and local streets. The City will prioritize repaving based on the PCI as well as citizen requests/complaints. Councilmember Teitzel commented there are numerous projects on the TIP with large numbers but it is difficult to determine what is front loaded. Citizens prioritized streets in the SAP and the City stopped maintaining its streets during the recession. He favored front loading the schedule to address streets. Public Works Director Phil Williams said the PCI is one piece of information used to identify pavement priorities. There are other considerations such as where utility work is being done; operations and engineering staff and the PCI are used to determine the best investments each year. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 10 Packet Pg. 15 0 M 4.2.a Councilmember Nelson said the wayside horns were originally planned in 2016 but are now into 2017. Mayor Earling said he was also surprised by that change. Mr. Williams commented where that got high centered was with the railroad. He explained passenger trains, which fit between the two crossings (freight trains do not) always stop at the station. For example, a northbound crossing Dayton will sound their horn manually, the signal arms operate automatically, the train slows and stops at the station. The train reaches the triggering point on the track for the Main Street station before it comes to a complete stop at the station which brings the signal arms at Main down briefly until the train completely stops and the signal arms go up until the passenger train is loaded. Once the train begins moving, the signal arms go down again. The current option given to the City for triggering the wayside horns is the same signal that operates the signal arms. That would mean every time a passenger train comes through there would be two sets of horns for 17 seconds each, in this example at Main for a northbound train or at Dayton for a southbound train. Instead of increasing the number of horn blasts, staff is trying to keep them the same, quieter but the same number. The City and the railroad are trying to determine if the railroad can reprogram their signal cabinets to accomplish that. If the railroad can't, and to date that is the answer that has been given, he will return to Council to inquire whether to proceed with the project. His recommendation would be to proceed but that would be a glitch in the system. The railroad has not yet provided a firm answer, hence the expectation the project will be extended into 2017. Mayor Earling said he knew of the technical problem but not the delay in the project to 2017. Mr. Williams said it may be done in 2016 but this issue would need to be cleared up quickly for that to happen. Councilmember Mesaros relayed his neighborhood is very concerned about the timing and strongly a anticipate the project being concluded. When a passenger train is in the center between Dayton and Main, the gates open at Main for a southbound train and the horn will stop once it passes through. He asked if the c Main Street crossing would be activated as the train passed through Dayton. Mr. Williams answered it would not impact the Main Street gates but there would be two sets of horn blasts at Dayton if the train is traveling south. Northbound there would only be one horn because the train is moving and it will hit the trigger point south of Dayton, bringing the signal arm down and activating the horn when the train comes into the station. The first signal the train arrives at would work normally; the second horn would also be activated due to the proximity. Councilmember Mesaros asked how many passenger trains travel through Edmonds each day. Mr. Williams answered 12. Councilmember Teitzel said the citizen's expectation is that this project will reduce the amount of noise from horns within hearing distance of the tracks. He asked if it was possible after the project is complete there would be the same or more horns in a 24-hour period. Mr. Williams answered there would be more horn blasts heard locally unless the railroad provides a different answer. The number of people in Edmonds that hear the train horns will be reduced dramatically either way. For those closest to the crossings, the experience would not be much different. Of 40 trains per day, 12 are passenger trains which will have twice as many horn blasts as before, that is an outcome the City would rather avoid so are trying to get that changed. The ferries, beaches, and other places close to Main would still be within the 92 decibel footprint but that is a much smaller footprint than before although there would still be noticeable noise near the crossing. Councilmember Teitzel summarized more horn blasts could be expected for passenger trains but the distance they were heard would be reduced. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Hearing no comment, Mayor Earling closed the public hearing. As the TIP does not need to be submitted until July 1, Council President Johnson suggested discussing it at the next study session and taking final action the following week. 7. ACTION ITEMS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 11 Packet Pg. 16 4.2.a CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 853 REGARDING THE TAKING OF MINUTES/NOTES IN EXECUTIVE SESSION City Clerk Scott Passey explained this was originally presented to Council on May 10 with rationale, implication and impacts. Council directed staff to bring it back May 24 to allow time for public comment. One public comment was received opposed to the idea of no longer taking minutes/notes in executive session. Following discussion at the May 24 meeting, Council directed the City Attorney to prepare a resolution repealing Resolution 853 that requires taking executive session minutes. The draft resolution is included in the packet. City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained the whereas clauses in the resolution add additional detail. One of the points in the whereas clauses that he may not have clearly explained previously was it has been suggested with regard to executive session notes that involve a level of attorney client privilege, the Council could take affirmative action in the future to over waive that attorney -client privilege so the public could read the executive session notes. The issue with that is under the rules of evidence when a party takes a deliberate action to disclose privileged material, the party cannot strictly confine the extent of that disclosure in the way they may think. In other words, by making deliberate disclosure of executive session notes on a particular lawsuit, the Council may be waiving much more than just the content of the executive session notes; they may be opening the door to allow for other privileged material to be released as well by court order. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 1360, RESCINDING RESOLUTION 853. T Councilmember Mesaros said the Council has created an atmosphere that minutes are being kept but they c� are actually notes because the Council never reviews, corrects or approves them. That has given the public an unreal impression and he felt it was time to stop doing that. In addition, both the City Clerk and City Attorney have informed that few organizations kept minutes/notes and the only other they could find was the Port of Seattle. Further, the Council does not make decisions during executive session; decisions are made during an open public meeting. He expressed support for this action. Councilmember Tibbott agreed with Councilmember Mesaros comments. In conversations with various members of the public, he assured the Council only discussed topics that qualified for executive session; those eight topics are listed in the packet. The Council also states in advance the topic for the executive session. He recommended any time an executive session topic arises at a Council meeting that the Council inform the public that it was previously discussed in executive session. He also requested the Council commit to a robust discussion regarding anything that was previously discussed in executive session. There may be an impression that because a topic has been discussed in executive session, it is not fully discussed in public. He assured that has not been practice; anytime a topic comes to a public meeting, there is a robust discussion of issues. The City is well -served by allowing Councilmembers to have confidential discussions in executive session. He committed to citizens any time an executive session item comes to a public meeting, that the public be informed and the Council have a robust discussion. Councilmember Teitzel also expressed support for rescinding Resolution 853. The Council does not review the notes so they are archived and rarely subsequently reviewed. The Council has an obligation to its citizens to analyze the cost/benefit; it is costs the City a great deal to take notes and archive them, time that could be spent responding to appropriate public records requests for example. For those reasons, he supported discontinuing the practice of taking notes in executive session. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. 8. STUDY ITEMS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 12 Packet Pg. 17 4.2.a UPDATE ON THE EDMONDS WATERFRONT ANALYSIS Rick Schaefer, Tetra Tech, displayed an aerial photograph of the waterfront and identified the purpose and need for the Waterfront Analysis: • Safe and reliable access to the entire waterfront area by emergency responders • Ferry loading and unloading • Access to the waterfront area by people driving, walking or biking • Ferry, rail and bus connections He displayed the schedule and described how the alternatives will be studied, identifying five study milestones, technical analysis steps and ways to be involved. The Level 1 screening of the solution concepts has been completed and the analysis is advancing into the Level 2 evaluation of more comprehensive alternatives. A fourth public meeting will be held at the conclusion of the Level 2 analysis to review the outcomes of the evaluation and the recommendations. He anticipated recommendations will be presented by September. He described how rail traffic affects access: Gate closures at Main Street and Dayton Street crossings 0 37.5 closures average per day 0 80 minutes average per day (5.5% of the day) 0 2:12 average closure duration (3:54 for unit trains) At Main Street crossing (daily average): o Vehicles delayed (84%) ferry traffic ■ 709 delayed by closures ■ 28.7 vehicle -hours o Pedestrians Delayed ■ 115 delayed by closures ■ 4.7 person -hours ■ 10-11 people/day crossing under/around gates o Over 10 ferry loadings/off loadings affected daily Three extended closures since the study began last fall 50-100% increase in number of trains passing through Edmonds daily in next 15 years (primarily through freight traffic) o BNSF's installation of second track has the potential to mitigate amount of closures Mr. Schaefer displayed a graph of response time for emergency calls across the tracks (Fire District 1 records July 1, 2010 — December 8, 2015) • 277 incidents • 64 had response times of 7 minutes or longer • Variety of causes for delays He displayed graphs of hourly distribution of emergency calls west of tracks and average number of Main Street gate closures. He displayed another graphic of the 2-stage screening/evaluation process: CONSIDERED SOLUTION CONCEPTS (from public, study team, prior studies) LEVEL 1 SCREENING --+ Document Decisions 4 HIGHEST RATED CONCEPTS y Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 13 Packet Pg. 18 T 0 M 4.2.a We are here LEVEL 2 EVALUATION — Document Decisions HIGHEST RATED ALTERNATIVES y PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS — Document Recommendations He displayed a graphic of the initial 51 concepts that included: • Overpass solutions • Underpass solutions • On -site solutions • Operational solutions • Railroad modifications • Ferry facilities modifications He reviewed Level 1 concept screening criteria that were screened as to yes, somewhat, not very well, with 4- challenges, no -fatal flaw: ° 1. Does the concept improve reliable emergency response to the west side of the railroad? c 2. Does the concept reduce delays to ferry loading/unloading of vehicles? Q. 3. Does the concept reduce delays and conflicts at street -railroad crossings for people walking, biking Q• Q or driving? 4. Does the concept provide safe and efficient passenger connectivity between available modes of c M travel? 5. Is the concept feasible to implement? 6. Does the concept avoid creating social and/or economic impacts? 7. Does the concept avoid negative environmental effects Mr. Schaefer displayed a sample Level 1 Rating sheet of the overpass solutions that identified projects that would/would not be advanced to Level 1. The concepts were reduced in the Level 1 screening from 51 to 6 early recommendations and 13 concepts that were combined into 10 alternatives for consideration in the Level 2 process. He reviewed the 6 early recommendations from Level 1: • Recommend City advance independently o Crosswalk improvements at Main Street/Railroad Avenue (Onsite 4) o Crosswalk improvements at Dayton Street/Railroad avenue (Onsite 5) • Recommend City advance with BNSF o Emergency notification to stop trains outside of Edmonds (Operational 4) • Recommend local agencies create/implement a Waterfront Emergency Evacuation Plan o First aid training for waterfront staff and residents (Onsite 1) o Helipad operational planning (Onsite 3) o Tsunami evacuation plan (Operational 7) He identified the Level 1 outcomes — 13 advancing concepts, consolidated into 10 alternatives: Level 1 Concepts 4 Level 2 Alternatives Overpass 1 Admiral Way Pedestrian/Emergency Vehicle Overpass Overpass 4B Dayton Street Pedestrian/Emergency Vehicle Overpass Overpass 9 Edmonds Street Pedestrian/Emergency Vehicle Overpass Overpass5/Onsite 2 Midblock Pedestrian Overpass, with stationed equipment Ove ass7A/Onsite 2 Main Street Pedestrian Overpass, with stationed equipment Underpass 4/Onsite 2 Main Street Pedestrian Underpass, with stationed equipment Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 14 Packet Pg. 19 4.2.a Ferry4/Ferry8 Main Street Ferry Overpass 1 Overpass 6 Main Street Ferry Overpass 2 Underpassl/Ferry 5 Main Street Ferry Underpass Ferry3 Dayton Street New Ferry Terminal He provided a map identifying the location of the above Level 2 alternatives: • Pedestrian/bicycle/emergency vehicle o Admiral Way Overpass o Dayton Street Overpass o Edmonds Street Overpass • Pedestrian/Bicycle o Mid -block overpass (pedestrian/bicycle) o Main Street overpass o Main Street Underpass • General traffic/pedestrian/bicycle o Dayton St New Ferry Terminal o Main Street Ferry Overpass 1 (Full Build) o Main Street Ferry Overpass 2 (Minimum Build) o Main Street Ferry Underpass Mr. Schaefer reviewed the Level 2 Alternative Evaluation Criteria: Purpose & Need 1. Reliable emergency response 2. Reduce ferry delays 3. Reduce delays and conflicts at crossings 4. Safe/efficient passenger connections Other Function 5. Emergency evacuation 6. Urban design and community goals 7. Consistent with transportation operations Implementation 8. Fundable and permittable 9. Temporary construction impacts 10. Environmental effects 11. Address sea level rise impacts He provided information regarding the three public meetings held to date: • November 18 o 116 attendees o 326 online visits 0 259 unique visitors 0 54 comment submittals January 27 0 83 attendees 0 38 newcomers 0 175 online visits 0 131 unique visitors 0 33 comment submittals • May 12 0 58 attendees 0 28 newcomers Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 15 Packet Pg. 20 T 0 M 4.2.a 0 268 online visits 0 191 unique visitors 0 20 comment submittals Councilmember Tibbott recalled at the May 12 public meeting, he asked WSDOT representatives how often traffic has been a problem for loading ferries. Their response was it was minimal, they have an over 90% on -time schedule. This raised the question to him how necessary it was to have a solution for loading ferries when it did not seem to be a problem; the primary issue was emergency, pedestrian and bicycle access. Mr. Schaefer agreed there was some slack in the ferry schedule; they eliminated some sailings providing more turnaround time and ability to absorb delays. However, traffic is increasing and they may add sailings reducing the turnaround time which could increase delays. Mr. Williams commented the Director of Ferries and the Regional WSDOT Director are members of the Task Force, and several other Ferries representatives attend Task Force meetings; WSDOT is very interested in this project. He recalled WSDOT totally supported Edmonds Crossing which was a very large project that ended up being too expensive. The net effect of Edmonds Crossing would have been to allow loading/unloading of ferries without interference from the railroad. He did foresee any lack of commitment on WSDOT's part, they would like to have the problem of the train tracks removed. WSDOT just started their long range ferry plan, and this analysis will coordinate with their planning efforts. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his understanding of Mr. Williams' comments that WSDOT would prioritize a vehicle crossing in addition to pedestrians and emergency access. Mr. Schaefer answered yes, noting Ferries anticipates costs for rehabilitating the existing terminal and some of those costs may be a avoided as part of one of the alternatives. Mr. Williams commented any of larger projects will require State funding partners such as the Ferries Division as well as Transportation. He recalled the State as well as c federal transportation funds were the primary contributors to Edmonds Crossing; he expected that same commitment to any large project that Edmonds sought to develop. At some point the City will have guided the project to a point where consensus has been achieved locally and with the State; he did not see the City delivering a project of this size locally, the State would end up taking on the project therefore it needed to be one they were enthusiastic about. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the hourly distribution of emergency calls and gate closures for a period of five years, not one year. She asked whether the emergency was defined or whether they were 911 calls. Mr. Schaefer answered they were 911 calls which are primarily emergency medical. He learned last week in a meeting with FD1 that they did not include calls to Marine 16 in this data which total about 40- 50/year, doubling the number of calls shown in the graph. Mr. Williams commented it was difficult to use the boat moored at the marina if personnel are unable to reach it, noting it was similar to having an engine on other side of the tracks, the key is the ability for personnel to reach it. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled Edmonds Crossing was a pie in sky because the plan was to get rid of the Mukilteo dock. Now that a new dock is being constructed at Mukilteo, she did not foresee WSDOT having the money to move the ferry terminal. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the map of options and asked for a description of the Admiral Way overpass and the merits of that location. Mr. Schaefer said although it may seem out of the way for emergency response, it is a distinct location and it is screened from view or back -dropped visually by hillside. It can drop into the Port property which may provide flexibility for a landing. It would follow the Unocal access road along the bottom of the hill, climb to an overpass structure, clear the to -be -relocated Willow Creek and the railroad and drop down into the edge of Port parking area. Councilmember Mesaros asked whether it would have pedestrian access. Mr. Schaefer said it would be routinely used for pedestrian and bicycle access and could accommodate an emergency vehicle when necessary. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 16 Packet Pg. 21 4.2.a Councilmember Mesaros commented another benefit of that alternative is the ability to circumnavigate the marsh. Mr. Schaefer said the ability to tie it into the trails, through marina and Marina Beach Park was identified as a community amenity. Mr. Williams said the same could be said for the Edmonds Street alternative; it would be available for emergency vehicles to provide aid on the west side of the tracks as well as allow pedestrians and bicycles to access waterfront amenities. Councilmember Mesaros commented that alternative did not circumnavigate the marsh. Mr. Schaefer said the grades in all alternatives provide ADA access. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the Dayton Street Overpass would require Port property and demolition of existing buildings. Mr. Schaefer agreed it would require some property but would not require any demolition. It would launch from the north side of Dayton along the edge of the Salish Crossing property, climb over the parking area south of the rail station, diagonally over the intersection and drop into the Port property behind their sign. It would encroach into the yard area of new Jacobson Marine but would not impact their building. Council President Johnson commented one of the advantages of this presentation is it gives the public an opportunity to hear everything that has been considered to date, especially those not able to attend public meetings or visit the website. She asked where the Level 2 evaluation criteria were firm. Mr. Schaefer answered they were drafted and presented to the community at the last meeting. Some comments were received although fewer than at past meetings which is the reason the online open house was extended an additional week and another notice issued. Council President Johnson observed the language on the working draft page and the criteria were similar but not exactly the same. Mr. Schaefer advised the language on the working draft had to be more brief, the c language on the working draft page is not the criteria, it is the purpose and need. He pointed out there are multiple components of each criterion. In Level 1 the consultant team did the first assessment against the criteria which was then validated by the Task Force. In Level 2 the consultant team is providing information and the Task Force is taking the first cut at the rating. Council President Johnson offered to provide Mr. Schaefer send her notes. She recalled an operational issue that has been discussed intermittently over the last 10 years was having a ferry reservation system on the Edmonds -Kingston route. She suggested that be considered in this effort. Councilmember Nelson (Co -Chair of the Task Force) recognized how hard the Task Force and and Mr Schaefer have been working. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 2. DISCUSSION OF WHETHER TO CONTINUE CITY'S PRACTICE OF CONDUCTING QUASI-JUDICIAL LAND USE HEARINGS Senior Planner Kernen Lien said this topic was discussed at the retreat and the May 10 Council meeting. Currently, there are three ways a land use action can come before the City Council for a quasi-judicial decision under a closed record review: 1) site specific rezone, 2) appeal of Type III-B decision (ADB or Hearing Examiner), and 3) public agency variance request. The Woodway Playfields quasi-judicial hearing was an appeal of a public agency variance request. The three issues the Council requested further information on included, 1) the history of quasi-judicial decisions before the Council, 2) recent decisions by the Council, and 3) what other jurisdictions are doing. With regard to the history, Mr. Lien explained the current code framework was established in 1980 and since then the City Council has been doing quasi-judicial hearings for appeals of Hearing Examiner, ADB and public agency variance requests. Prior to that time, the City had a Board of Adjustment, a 7-member Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 17 Packet Pg. 22 4.2.a board that heard variances, condition use permits, etc., things the Hearing Examiner now hears. Decisions of the Board of Adjustment went to Superior Court. In 2009 the City established the current process framework, Type I through V permits. At that time there was considerable discussion regarding the Council's involvement in the quasi-judicial decision process. Discussion was focused primarily on the Type III-B decisions by the Hearing Examiner and ADB. He referred to minutes from the 2009 update that were emailed to Council today. Also included in the packet, Exhibit 3, is a list of pros and cons prepared by Rob Chave in 2009 regarding Council involvement in quasi- judicial decisions. When the Title 20 update was passed in June 2009, Hearing Examiner and ADB appeals were taken out of the City Council and became appeals to Superior Court. At the first Council meeting in January 2010, an interim ordinance was passed that again inserted the Council into closed record appeals. The discussion at that time did not focus on rezones or public agency variances, only appeals and whether to have oral or written arguments to Council on appeals as it is easier to track whether something is in the record when the record is written versus oral. A permanent ordinance was passed in September 2010. Mr. Lien reviewed quasi-judicial decisions since 2010 in the 3 categories: t� Seven site specific rezones c o Planning Board makes recommendation to City Council > o Council upheld 6 o One was denied on a 3-3 vote a Four public agency variance requests Q • Council approved most requests o • Woodway Playfields was more complex and included five permits M v o Hearing Examiner recommended denial of two o By the time it reached the Council, the School District withdrew those two o Council essentially upheld Hearing Examiner decision and added a few conditions of approval to the Hearing Examiner's recommendation a, • Type III-B decisions c o Four projects 0 5 appeals (Building 10 appealed to City Council twice) 0 2 reversed c o Regarding Building 10, the City Council reversed the ADB decision and a critical area variance c request U With regard to other jurisdictions' quasi-judicial procedures, Mr. Lien referred to Exhibit 4, explaining most jurisdictions have a quasi-judicial process for site specific rezones. Some include an appeal to City Council from the Hearing Examiner, others do not. Councilmember Mesaros asked how many times a City Council decision has been appealed to Superior Court. Mr. Lien answered in the last 10 years, Building 10 and Woodway Playfields were appealed to Superior Court. There was a settlement agreement for Building 10 so no decision was issued and the City prevailed with regard to the Woodway Playfields. City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained the court never ruled on Building 10 decision so it was unknown whether the Council's decision would have been upheld had the court ruled. That project was of a magnitude that had the Council's decision not been upheld, there could have been real damages resulting from that application process. Councilmember Teitzel recalled the Council previously discussed the cost to appeal a decision to Superior Court versus to the City Council. Mr. Lien answered the fee for an appeal of a Type III-B decision to City Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 18 Packet Pg. 23 4.2.a Council is $500. Mr. Taraday said the filing fee for Superior Court is $250; the cost could be much more if the appellant hired an attorney. Councilmember Buckshnis recommended the Council read the 2009 minutes. She commended Mr. Lien for his research and for summarizing it for the public. Councilmember Mesaros commented there could also be attorney costs for an appeal to City Council if the appellant chose to hire an attorney. Councilmember Nelson thanked Lien for the summary. He recalled going through one public agency variance request and found the information regarding other decisions very comprehensive and helpful. Council President Johnson commented there is also a cost to the City Council for the more elaborate appeals that come to the City Council. For example, Burnstead and Building 10, the City engaged separate counsel r for the City Council at a cost of approximately $5,000 per case. There is also the expense of time; they were not easy decisions and required many meetings. She said it makes sense for some quasi-judicial proceedings to come to the City Council, those that are quick and efficient. However, for the ones that seemingly take 'o endless amounts of reading, study and evaluation, she preferred they go to Superior Court because they 0 usually end up in Superior Court anyway. She asked if a distinction could be made in the Type III-B o decisions between large and small application. She recalled two of the Type III-B decisions were very small involving one property and two were very large and required tremendous time and effort. Mr. Taraday said the City probably could distinguish; there would need to be criteria established in advance for distinguishing a between them. For example, the current categories of decisions are not the universe of possible categories. One category the City Council is stuck with hearing is site specific rezones. c M Council President Johnson referred to the risk associated with Council serving in a quasi-judicial capacity; if the City lost in an appeal to Superior Court, the City would be responsible for much more than just the filing fee. Mr. Taraday explained the City could be required to pay damages if the City Council's decision was found to be arbitrary and capricious. In extreme cases Councilmembers as individuals can be held personally liable for decisions made when serving in a quasi-judicial capacity. In its legislative capacity, the Council has nearly absolute personally immunity. In a quasi-judicial capacity, there is the theoretical m possibility of a personal liability lawsuit because the immunity is only qualified not absolute. For example, in the Mission Springs in Spokane Councilmembers were found not to be immune from the personal suit filed against them. Councilmember Tibbott thanked staff for the synopsis the Council received this afternoon and suggested it be included in a future packet. Development Services Director Shane Hope agreed it would. Councilmember Tibbott recalled the Planning Board heard four quasi-judicial cases, three were straightforward and the questions Planning Board Members asked provided material for the City Council. One was more complex and the Planning Board needed more preparation to process it adequately. If the Council continued to hear site specific rezones, he asked if they would still go to Planning Board for a recommendation to City Council. Ms. Hope answered yes, the process would stay the same. Councilmember Tibbott recommended providing Planning Board enough notice regarding upcoming hearings so they do not engage with a project before it comes to Planning Board to avoid tainting the process. He discussed this with two former Planning Board Members, one was in favor of the Council moving away from quasi-judicial reviews and the other was in favor of retain the Council in that role so he was able to see benefits on both sides, especially with rezones. If the Council continued to hear site specific rezones, he recommended identifying ways to improve the process; for example, inform the Council in advance so they do not engage with proponents or opponents. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 19 Packet Pg. 24 4.2.a Councilmember Tibbott preferred the Council not hear more extensive appeals. While on the Planning Board, he felt members were asked to provide input regarding topics they were not trained for. There was one lawyer on the Planning Board who was able to look at the issue from a legal perspective but other Planning Board Members were not. There are benefits from a diversity of views looking at a project and offers insight; however, on complex appeals that require a great deal of study, he preferred to delegate them to the Hearing Examiner or other body. Ms. Hope agreed the Planning Board needed to have the proper training; staff has been more proactively recently in helping the Planning Board understand their role and legal requirements. Staff will consider how to distinguish between small and large projects for example according to the value of the project, property size, etc. With regard to whether the Planning Board would continue to make recommendations to the City Council regarding rezone, Mr. Taraday said they could but they do not have to; it could be done by the Hearing Examiner. Quoting Councilmember Councilmember Nelson, Councilmember Mesaros said citizens elected Councilmember to primarily be legislators, not judges. The skill set Councilmembers bring to the Council is for pondering legislative opportunities and making choices for citizens; serving in a quasi-judicial role puts the Council in a difficult position, a role they not be as equipped for. Councilmember Nelson asked Mr. Taraday to explain qualified immunity versus absolute immunity, pointing out if Councilmembers are making decisions for which they are personally liable, they need to know what that entails. Mr. Taraday offered to provide a more in-depth analysis in writing. With qualified a immunity, a Councilmember is not as fully protected personally from a suit; although there is a decent chance of having a suit dismissed, in extreme case a Councilmember could have personal liability. The c prospect of a Councilmember being sued is not just a theoretically possibility; a Councilmember was named in the Building 10 lawsuit. Councilmember Teitzel said he was also concerned about the Council's skill set to serve judges. It gives him pause personally to act in quasi-judicial fashion, reviewing the record to determine whether an Administrative Law Judge or Hearing Examiner made a legal error. He felt ill equipped to make that decision as he was not an attorney and wanted to avoid being in that role in the future. He agreed the Council could be involved in site specific rezones. 3. TITLE 19 BUILDING AND FIRE CODE UPDATES Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced Building Official Leif Bjorback and Fire Marshal Kevin Zweber. She referred to a pile of books that represented thousands of pages; the ordinance summarizes key changes made to the code based on State requirements. Following the presentation and Q&A, she requested the ordinance be forwarded to the Consent Agenda. Mr. Bj orback explained every three years the International Building Code (IBC) is updated and republished by the International Code Council. The IBC is a family of codes including commercial, residential fire, plumbing, energy, etc. that are used in most areas of the country including the State of Washington. The codes are adopted with certain changes at the State level and mandated by RCW 19.27 to be adopted and enforced by all jurisdictions within the State. The 2015 IBC along with the State amendments become effective statewide July 1, 2016. The proposed revisions to ECDC Title 19 will adopt the 2015 codes along with the State amendments. In addition, Edmonds -specific amendments are proposed to provide clarification as well as better coordination with other portions of the City code. No substantial changes to the Building or Fire Code are being proposed at this time. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 20 Packet Pg. 25 4.2.a Attachment C contains the ordinance text as proposed, including comments in the margin explaining the changes. The two main building codes in the City are the IBC and the International Residential Code (IRC). Mr. Bjorback reviewed: • Changes to the IBC: o Total reorganization of Chapter 5 which identifies how big, tall a building can be and the requirements o Rewrite of Chapter 5, not many impacts to actual building construction o Accessibility requirements increased in scope and specifics, most significantly for recreational facilities (amusement rides, boat slips, swimming pools) o The Building Code and the Existing Building Code have had duplicate language regarding alterations to existing building such as remodels, change of occupancy, etc. In this update, the IBC dispensed with the chapter because it was duplicated in the Existing Building Code. o New appendix for solar readiness developed by State and available for voluntary adoption by jurisdictions with regard to solar zones on a roof, roof penetration, structural design, etc. • Changes to the IRC: o Swimming pools for single family homes are now regulated by the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code. Regulations previously in an appendix in the IRC. o Expanded regulations regarding solar provisions, increased scoping, specific regulations regarding access and array o New provisions in energy code to accommodate State and Federal mandates for increased energy efficiency • State amendments o Added definition of nightclub and improve safety requirements o Align with regulations for licensed care facilities and medical facilities and Department of M Health o Accessibility o Energy code tweaks Fire Marshal Zweber reviewed changes in the International Fire Code (IFC). • Authorization can be given to begin emergency repairs without a permit and apply for permit the next business day • Decorative open flame tables • Compressed CO2 - Over 100 pounds requires alarm • Local: Banned sky lanterns • Fire code gives him authority make fire lanes wider, added authority to make smaller Councilmember Buckshnis asked about construction in a designated floodway and the difference between a flood hazard areas, a floodway and a floodplain. Mr. Bjorback said a flood hazard area is the general term for all areas that flood; a floodway is related to a river or stream and any adjacent land area expected to be inundated in a flood event. The City has very few properties that are in floodways. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the critical area ordinance would trump locating a house in floodplain. Mr. Bjorback answered he believed it would. After consulting with Mr. Lien, it was agreed to retain the language in the IBC. Councilmember Teitzel recalled controversy in the past regarding the definition of director; in Section 19.10.020 director is defined as, director shall mean director of development services as well as any authorized representative of the director. Section 23.40.230 of the Critical Area Ordinance defines director as, director means the City of Edmonds development services director or his/her designee. He requested the definitions be consistent with the recently approved CAO. Ms. Hope said that could be done although it is a distinction without a difference, it would not be interpreted differently. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 21 Packet Pg. 26 4.2.a It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the Consent Agenda. 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported on the unveiling of the spray pad; hundreds of people, mostly children, have been visiting the spray pad. It was a great opening as reported in an article in today's Herald. With regard to the Proclamation for Music4Life, he invited anyone with an easily restorable instrument to contact his office for contact information for Music4Life. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Nelson said he and his two children have visited the spray pad twice and they love it. Next, he referred to the oil train derailment in Mosier, Oregon, relaying the words of their fire chief that they dodged a bullet because they did not have the resources to equip themselves to address even a minor oil incident. Sixteen oil cars derailed carrying Bakken oil which has been documented to be more explosive than crude oil. Although the oil was being transported in modern, safer steel cars, 42,000 gallons of oil were released and it took 15 fire departments to put the fire out. Ten oil trains a week pass through Snohomish County carrying a million gallons of Bakken oil. In future discussions regarding fire services, he urged consideration of the risks that face the community and the necessary resources to respond. Councilmember Teitzel reported on Sunday's presentation of a plaque to the North Sound Church designating the church on the local registry of historic places. The church appreciates the plaque and the designation and are excited to be on the local registry. T 0 Councilmember Buckshnis agreed the community needs to be conscious about what is happening with oil and the takers. She thanked all involved for the wonderful Waterfront Festival last weekend. It was a a fun, N well attended event. She expressed appreciation to the Port for allowing the use of their property.; Council President Johnson announced Edmonds was selected by Western Washington University and AWC as a participant in Western's collegiate program. She listed the ten projects that the students will work on with the City during the next year: • Sea level rise mitigation planning • Edmonds Memorial Cemetery inventory and mapping • Stella's Landing environmental assessment • Public relations campaign for the 4' Avenue cultural corridor • Zero waste and food waste programs • Edmonds Mash environmental enhancement • Wastewater treatment plant information brochure and tour materials • Downtown business tourism local application • Playful city initiative • Green business program A contract as well as further information regarding the projects will be presented to the Council in the near fixture. Council President Johnson reported installation of the art feature, Illuminous Forest, has begun on the 4' Avenue Cultural Corridor. Councilmember Mesaros reported on the Memorial Day ceremony at the Edmonds Cemetery attended by Mayor Earling and Councilmembers Teitzel, Nelson, Fraley-Monillas, Johnson and himself. Approximately 400 people attended the wonderful ceremony, an event the City should be proud of. The highlight was a student essay. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 22 Packet Pg. 27 4.2.a Councilmember Tibbott reported on last week's Town Hall meeting at the Meadowdale clubhouse, an opportunity to hear about the City as well as the neighborhood's concerns which include the Haines Wharf residue. He was hopeful that could be addressed in the coming years. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the arts magazine published by the Meadowdale High School Art Department depicting artwork by local high students including a drawing by City Clerk Scott Passey's son. 11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:54 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 7, 2016 Page 23 Packet Pg. 28 T 0 M 4.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Approval of claim checks. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #220279 through #220389 dated June 9, 2016 for $222,149.48. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks. Financial Impact $222,149.48 Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claim cks 06-09-16 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 06-09-16 Packet Pg. 29 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 1 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220279 6/9/2016 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 368308 MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 82.3: 368336 PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONI PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONI 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 137.2E Total: 219.6( 220280 6/9/2016 072189 ACCESS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 1479066 STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 6/1/201 STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 06/01/� 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 85.0( Total: 85.0( 220281 6/9/2016 065568 ALLWATER INC 042916039 WWTP: DRINKING WATER SERVICI Water services (plus rental/supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 16.3E Total: 16.3E 220282 6/9/2016 073626 ALPHA ECOLOGICAL 1265729 PS - BI/MO MAINT AGREEMENT PS - Bi/Mo Maint Agreement 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 99.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 9.7( Total: 108.7( 220283 6/9/2016 001528 AM TEST INC 92588 WWTP: ICP SCAN & MERCURY BY ICP scan & mercury by CVAA 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 75.0( Total: 75.0( 220284 6/9/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1988614510 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 76.7( 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 7.5, Page: 1 Packet Pg. 30 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220284 6/9/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 1988618522 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT _ FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 0 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 11.2( FLEET DIVISION MATS t 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 25.6z 9.8% Sales Tax M 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.1' 6 9.8% Sales Tax o 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 2.5' 5 1988625151 WWTP: UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MA L wwtp uniforms a 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 5.1( Q wwtp mats & towels c 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 108.5E M 9.8% Sales Tax 77 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.5( w 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.6z c 1988625152 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE to PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE N 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 54.8( PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE E 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 1.8 1988625153 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS m 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 24.9( E 9.8% Sales Tax U 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.4z r Q 1988629129 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: Page: 2 Packet Pg. 31 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220284 6/9/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 220285 6/9/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1' _ PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: vi 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: t 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1' PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: M 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0E 6 9.8% Sales Tax o 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.1E 9.8% Sales Tax o L 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6( 0- 9.8% Sales Tax Q 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6( c 9.8% Sales Tax M 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6( 9.8% Sales Tax m 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6( d6 9.8% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5� o 1988629130 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT N FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 6.4( . FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 12.3E 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.6, E 9.8% Sales Tax U 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.2' Q Total: 389.6E 88259 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 33.7� UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing Page: 3 Packet Pg. 32 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220285 6/9/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 220286 6/9/2016 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 43575 220287 6/9/2016 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC CEO0516 220288 6/9/2016 075662 BC BOOKWORLD 220289 6/9/2016 071348 BERGERABAM PO # Description/Account 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 9.6% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 9.6% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 9.6% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Total STANDARD ROUGH BOX-FOISTER STANDARD ROUGH BOX-FOISTER 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 Total BACKGROUND CHECK SERVICES 3 NATIONWIDE- 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Total WOTS AD BC WOTS AD BC SUMMER 2016 WOTS AD BC SUMMER 2016 123.000.64.573.20.41.40 Total 26684 E4MB.SERVICES THRU 5/21/16 E4MB.Services thru 5/21/16 016.000.66.518.30.41.00 Total 4.3.a Page: 4 Page: 4 Packet Pg. 33 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 5 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220290 6/9/2016 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC 531864 ESFE/ESGA.PLANS & SPECS COPIE ESFE.Plans & Specs Copies 422.200.72.594.31.41.00 130.6z ESGA.Plans & Specs Copies 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 430.0E Total : 220291 6/9/2016 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 11835 ESNA.SERVICES THRU MAY 31, 20' ESNA.Services thru May 31, 2016 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 ESNA.Services thru May 31, 2016 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 ESNA.Services thru May 31, 2016 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 Total 220292 6/9/2016 074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE TB-162238860 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES - TRAVEL CLaim for Travel Expenses for May 21 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 Total 220293 6/9/2016 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 1050423 E5GA/E5JA/E4GB.PUBLISHING BID ESGA.Publishing Bid Docs 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 ESJA.Publishing Bid Docs 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 E4GB.Publishing Bid Docs 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 Total 220294 6/9/2016 075278 BURNS, HOUSTON 5/3-5/26 FIELD ATTEN 5/3-5/26/16 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTEI` 5/3-5/26/16 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTE� 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total 220295 6/9/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 16113645 CONTRACT CHARGE, METER USE) Page: 5 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220295 6/9/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) CONTRACT CHARGE, METER USE) 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 507.8z Total: 507.81 220296 6/9/2016 075092 CASCADE BICYCLE CLUB ED FNDN 40052 E3DC.SERVICES THRU MARCH 201 E3DC.Services thru March 2016 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 5,976.4' Total: 5,976.4' 220297 6/9/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC 9433254274 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 321.3( 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 30.5, 9433297029 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 253.5( 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 24.0E 9433336761 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 211.4( 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 20.0E 9433343681 ROADWAY - CEMENT Roadway - Cement 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 565.0( 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 53.6E Total : 1,479.5E 220298 6/9/2016 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN05161020 GYMNASTICS HELIUM TANK RENT/ GYMNASTICS HELIUM TANK RENT) 001.000.64.571.28.45.00 12.7,1 9.8% Sales Tax Page: 6 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220298 6/9/2016 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) RN05161021 220299 6/9/2016 074255 COAL CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOC 120902-13 220300 6/9/2016 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 53355 220301 6/9/2016 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC JUN-16 220302 6/9/2016 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 220303 6/9/2016 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 3-G 1543 MAY 2016 PO # Description/Account 001.000.64.571.28.45.00 WWTP: CYLINDER RENTAL+ HAZN nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide + 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total WWTP: 1/1/16-5/21/16 TECH ASSIS' 1/1/16 - 5/21/16 Technical assistance 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total EDMONDS CITY CODE UPDATE 5/1 EDMONDS CITY CODE ELECTRONI 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Total C/A CITYOFED00001 Jun-16 Fiber Optics Internet Connect 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 Apr-16 overage charge 10.8866 @ $� 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 Total UNIT E108PO - NEW 2016 FORD PC Unit E108PO - New 2016 Ford Police 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Total DRY CLEANING APRIL-MAY 2016-El CLEANING/LAUNDRY APRIL/MAY 2( 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 4.3.a Page: 7 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 220303 6/9/2016 065683 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING (Continued) 220304 6/9/2016 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3313771 220305 6/9/2016 067794 DALCO INC 220306 6/9/2016 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 220307 6/9/2016 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03 3313987 90146 374861 Description/Account Total E1CA.PUBLISHING OF INVITATION E1CA.Publishing of Invitation to Bid 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 BUSINESS RECRUITMENT ADS FOI Business recruitment ads for May in 1 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 Total WWTP: VALVE POPOFF, LABOR & VALVE POPOFF 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 LABOR & SERVICE CALL 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 Total E1CA.SERVICES THRU 4/9/16 ElCA.Services thru 4/9/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Total 413531 INV#413531 - EDMONDS PD CALIBRATE #AS010981 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-14955 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-03836 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-14984 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-03890 4.3.a Page: 8 Amoun 507.8' N 569.4( E 800.0( u 1,369.4( c 0 a 24.9E 0 135.0( c M 2.4E m 13.Z c 175.61 co 0 N 12,356.0E 12,356.0E c m E t 70.0( U a 70.0( Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220307 6/9/2016 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 220308 6/9/2016 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2016050051 220309 6/9/2016 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 220310 6/9/2016 007253 DUNN LUMBER PO # Description/Account 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHS-08723 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #GHD-12646 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 CALIBRATE #SHD-01690 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 FUELSURCHARGE 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 Total CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 Scan Services for May 2016 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 Total 16-3660 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5/10/2016 5/10/16 & 5/17/2016 CITY COUNCIL 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 16-3662 INV 16-3662 EDMONDS PD IA 16-001 20.5 HRS TRANSCRIPTIO 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 CASE 16-10576 1.2 HRS TRANSCRI 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 CASE 16-11419 2.2 HRS TRANSCRI 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 Total 3982467 CITY PARK PLYWOOD CITY PARK PLYWOOD 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.3.a Page: 9 Page: 9 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 220310 6/9/2016 007253 007253 DUNN LUMBER (Continued) 220311 6/9/2016 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2345 220312 220313 220314 220315 6/9/2016 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 21198 DAWSON SCHOLAF 6/9/2016 038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 6/9/2016 075566 EHRBAR, PAMELA 2016-06-01 L9011.1sul:1 6/9/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR40482 AR40483 4.3.a Page: 10 Description/Account Amoun Total : 46.01 DIVERSITY COMMISSION FEE FOR vi Fee for Diversity Commission entry in 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 25.0( Total: 25.0( E 21198 JOSHUA DAWSON SCHOLAF 21198 JOSHUA DAWSON SCHOLAF ,- 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 75.0( o Total: 75.0( > 0 L 06/16 RECREATION SERVICES COP Q- Q. 06/16 Recreation Services Contract F Q 001.000.39.569.10.41.00 5,000.0( o Total : 5,000.0( aoi ADMNIISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR E m BID Administrative services 6/1-6/3/1E a6 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 300.0( c Total : 300.0( o WATER SEWER COPY USE- cYi Water Sewer Copy Use- E 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.7E Water Sewer Copy Use- 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.7E y 9.8% Sales Tax E 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.0( U 9.8% Sales Tax r 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.0E Q PW COPY USE- PW Copy Use- 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 36.9z PW Copy Use- 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 20.9: Page: 10 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 220315 6/9/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) AR40982 AR41595 220316 6/9/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH700466 4.3.a Page: 11 PO # Description/Account Amoun PW Copy Use- 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 20.9< w PW Copy Use- 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 14.7E PW Copy Use- E 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 14.7E PW Copy Use- 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 14.7E o 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 3.6, 0- 9.8% Sales Tax a 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 2.0: Q 9.8% Sales Tax c 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 2.0: M 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.4E w 9.8% Sales Tax d6 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.4E c 9.8% Sales Tax o 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.4E Y FLEET COPY USE- V Fleet Copy Use- E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 M 9.0( 6 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.8E ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02 E t Maintenance for printers 02/21/16 - U 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 307.2( Q 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 30.1' Total : 506.0' E1CA.PUBLISHING INVITATION TO E1CA.Publishing Invitation to Bid Page: 11 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 220316 6/9/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD (Continued) 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Total: 220317 6/9/2016 063953 EVERGREEN STATE HEAT & A/C 31007 PW - TROUBLESHOOT/REPAIRS HI PW - Troubleshoot/Repairs Heating E 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total: 220318 6/9/2016 071026 FASTSIGNS OF LYNNWOOD 443-20926 FLOWER BASKET TAG -1ST ONE MI FLOWER BASKET TAG -1ST ONE MI 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 Total: 220319 6/9/2016 069469 FLINT TRADING INC 196026 E7AC.PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROWS , E7AC.Plastic Traffic Arrows & Bike Le 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 196396 E3DB.TURN ARROWS E3DB.Turn Arrows 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 196442 TRAFFIC - 8' LEFT TURN ARROWS Traffic - 8' Left Turn Arrows 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 8' Right Turn Arrows 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 8' Only 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9'10" Straight Arrow 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 13' 1" Right Combi Arrows 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 13'1" Left Combi Arrows 4.3.a Page: 12 Page: 12 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor 220319 6/9/2016 069469 FLINT TRADING INC 220320 6/9/2016 075536 FIR EGONESE ASSOCIATES 220321 6/9/2016 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 13 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2,938.3, _ 12" White Lines vi 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 6,914.8E 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1,771.8, Total: 27,480.35 c� 436-005 CONSULTING o CONSULTING @ 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 16,998.51 p Total: 16,998.5j a Q. 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY Ai Q TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY Ai c 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 260.5 , TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, ` 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 260.5 1 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI °6 0 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 41.9. N 253-012-9189 WWTP: AUTO DIALER - 1 VOICE GI Y WWTP AUTO DIALER- 1 VOICE GR E 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 41.3z 'M 253-017-7256 WWTP: TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGRA WWTP: TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGRA 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 224.0E E 425-745-5055 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL PHOI` MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL PHOI` cvv 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 r 91.6' Q PARKS MAINT IP LINE (10 + TAX) 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 10.9E 425-771-5553 WWTP: AUTO DIALER - 1 BUSINES WWTP: AUTO DIALER - 1 BUSINES 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 114.5� 425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCI Page: 13 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 14 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220321 6/9/2016 011900 FRONTIER (Continued) LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRAI _ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 47.2: vi 425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( t 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 53.8E U 425-776-5316 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 98.3 0 Total: 1,245.11 0 220322 6/9/2016 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL 005256773 1NV#005256773 ACCT#1 00 1074529- 0- TAC DRY RAIN SHELL - LG 0. Q 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 129.9� NO SOUND SWAT LOGO o 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9� S/S POLO - LG 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 39.9� RIGHT CHEST EMBROIDERY o 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 6.5� c NO SOUND SWAT LOGO Y 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9� S/S POLO - LG E 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 39.9� NO SOUND SWAT LOGO 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9£ y RIGHT CHEST EMBROIDERY E 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 13.1 £ U NO SOUND SWAT LOGO r 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9� Q RIGHT CHEST EMBROIDERY 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 6.5� NO SOUND SWAT EMBROIDERY 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9� Page: 14 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 15 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220322 6/9/2016 002500 GALLS LLC DBA BLUMENTHAL (Continued) 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 26.5< _ 005288473 1NV#005288473 ACCT#1001074529- vi S/S POLO - LG 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 39.9� t RIGHT CHEST EMBROIDERY 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 6.5E NO SOUND SWAT LOGO 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9� o S/S POLO - LG 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 39.9� o RIGHT CHEST EMBROIDERY L a Q. 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 6.5� Q NO SOUND SWAT LOGO c 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9� M 9.6% Sales Tax 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 10.4E m 005408554 1NV#005408554 ACCT#1 00 1074529- a6 TAC DRY RAIN SHELL - XL C 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 129.9� o NO SOUND SWAT LOGO N 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 7.9� 9.6% Sales Tax E 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 13.2E Total: 573.6E c 220323 6/9/2016 075663 GAMINO, KRISTA 6/7 REFUND 6/7 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSITAN m E 6/7 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT AN U 001.000.239.200 530.0( r Total: 530.0( Q 220324 6/9/2016 072515 GOOGLE INC 3360361257 BILLING ID# 5030-2931-5908 Google Apps - May-2016 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 31.0( Total: 31.0( Page: 15 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor 220325 6/9/2016 012199 GRAINGER Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 16 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 9104107488 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Shop Supplies _ 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 25.1, vi 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 a� 2.4E 9105432778 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES E Fac Maint - Shop Supplies cu 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 135.8( 6 9.8% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.3' 9106002984 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES o Fac Maint Shop Supplies L 0- 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 27.7' Q 9.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0 2.5E M 9106002992 SR CENTER - SUPPLIES Sr Center - Supplies m 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 212.1' 9.2% Sales Tax C 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 19.5( o 9119599877 PS - SUPPLIES N PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 117.6, . 9.2% Sales Tax c° 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.8: ; 9119599885 PS - SUPPLIES y PS - Supplies E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 91.9£ U 9.8% Sales Tax r Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.01 9119896885 FAC - DOOR REINFORCER 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.0: FAC - Door Reinforcer 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.9, Page: 16 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220325 6/9/2016 012199 GRAINGER (Continued) 9123526924 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES Library - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 21.9z 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.1( Total: 726.01 220326 6/9/2016 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 660417 OLD PUBLIC WORKS SECURITY Old Public Works Security 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 55.0( Total: 55.0( 220327 6/9/2016 012560 HACH COMPANY 9941124 WWTP: 5/23-9/22/16 2V SOLITAX SE 5/23/16 - 9/22/16 2V Solitax Sensor 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 323.3: 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 31.6� 9950281 WWTP: UV LAMP & BIOPACK PURII UV LAMP & BIOPACK PURIFICATIOI 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 640.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 62.7. Total: 1,057.7� 220328 6/9/2016 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 38551 STORM PLAN REVIEW SUPPORT 5 Storm Plan Review Support 5/27/16 001.000.67.518.21.41.00 1,316.1( Total: 19316.1( 220329 6/9/2016 074746 HIGUCHI, ROD 20986 UKULELE 20986 UKULELE INSTRUCTION 20986 UKULELE INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 292.6( Total: 292.6( 220330 6/9/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2032577 WWTP: GAL NPL. GAL ELBOW, VTE Page: 17 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 18 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220330 6/9/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) GAL NPL. GAL ELBOW, VTEE, GAL _ 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 34.7� vi 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 a� 3.3' 3594383 WWTP: EMPTY METAL PAINT CANT E WWTP: EMPTY METAL PAINT CANT 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 11.9, 6 9.8% Sales Tax o 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1.1 < Total: 51.1! o L Q 220331 6/9/2016 075119 HOPE, SHANE 05252016 MILEAGE-5/25/16 AHA JOINT BOAR Q- Q MILEAGE-5/25/16 AHA JOINT BOAR 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 19.6E o Total: 19.6E 220332 6/9/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2803605 CITY COUNCIL OFFICE SUPPLIES Desk & Office Cleaner Wipes- c 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 34.2E co 9.8% Sales Tax N 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 3.3E 2806020 WWTP: SHEET PROTECTORS+STA E SHEET PROTECTORS+STAPLE REI ca 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 14.2E 9.8% Sales Tax c 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.4( E Total: 53.2$ u a 220333 6/9/2016 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 1905701032412 INV 1905701032412 EDMONDS PD r Q 1.5 V ALK AAA BATTERIES - 24 PAC 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 38.0( 1.5 V ALK AA BATTERIES - 24 PACK 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 38.0( 3V LITHIUM CR2032 BATTERIES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 8.4: Page: 18 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 19 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220333 6/9/2016 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS (Continued) 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 8.2E 300-10008859 PM: GLOVES, EAR PLUGS PM: GLOVES, EAR PLUGS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 199.9E 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.6( Total: 312.2i 220334 6/9/2016 075659 JAMES & SHERON GIVAN 4-29275 #680363 UTILITY REFUND #680363 Utility refund - received 411.000.233.000 106.2, Total: 106.2, 220335 6/9/2016 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 4016 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC Jun-16 Fiber Optics Internet Connect 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 500.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 49.0( 220336 6/9/2016 075661 JANET MAPLES DESIGN /IZZY GIRL BID-05272016 220337 6/9/2016 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 689964 220338 6/9/2016 075656 KARL WEISER & PAMELA ROAKE 2-26575 Total SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT FOR Social media management for BID M, 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total WWTP: HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTIOP HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION-- 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 Total #500041009-KD UTILITY REFUND #500041009-KD Utility refund Page: 19 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 220338 6/9/2016 075656 KARL WEISER & PAMELA ROAKE (Continued) 220339 6/9/2016 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 300037727 220340 6/9/2016 067877 KINGSTON LUMBER SUPPLY COMPANY 472064 220341 6/9/2016 074240 KNIGHT, KAREN 220342 6/9/2016 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING 21070 FUN FACTORY 21071 FUN FACTORY 4480501 4480715 PO # Description/Account 411.000.233.000 Total : INV 300037727 CUST ID 100828 ED 10 CASES COPY PAPER 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 HANDLING FEE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Total TRAFFIC - STUDS AND SUPPLIES Traffic - Studs and Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total 21070 FUN FACTORY INSTRUCTIOI 21070 FUN FACTORY INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 21071 FUN FACTORY INSTRUCTIOI 21071 FUN FACTORY INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total INVOICE# 4480501 SHREDDING SE INVOICE # 4480501- 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 INVOICE # 4480501- 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 INV 4480715 ACCT 2185-952778-81! SHRED 2 TOTES - 5/25/16 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 4.3.a Page: 20 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 220342 6/9/2016 075016 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING (Continued) 220343 6/9/2016 074388 LONE MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS 17497 220344 6/9/2016 075657 LOONEY, JAMIE 17498 17499 17500 17501 5/31 REFUND 4.3.a Page: 21 Description/Account Amoun Total : 13.61 INV#17497 - EDMONDS PD vi TEST MTS2000 466CDS0667 RADIC Y 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 135.0( INV#17498 - EDMONDS PD TEST MTS2000 466CDS0659 RADIC E 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 135.0( u PART -CIRCUIT FLEX/SPKR/MIC/LC( o 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 49.7E @ PART -SWITCH, TRANSMIT POPPLE > 0 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 4.9E a INV#17499 - EDMONDS PD Q- Q TEST MTS2000 466CDS0625 RADIC 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 135.0( o PART -CIRCUIT 2 LAYER FLEX CON' M 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 49.7E PART -CIRCUIT 2 LAYER FLEX F/CV 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 49.7E o PART -SWITCH, 3P MODE ca 0 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 8.0( Y INV#17500 - EDMONDS PD TEST MTS2000 466CDS0607 RADIC E 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 135.0( ca PART -CIRCUIT 2 LAYER FLEX 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 49.7E PART -CIRCUIT 2 LAYER FLEX FCVF E 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 49.7E U INV#17501 -EDMONDS PD r TEST MTS2000 466CDS0649 Q 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 135.0( Total : 936.7( 5/31/16 REFUND 5/31 REFUND 001.000.239.200 145.0( Page: 21 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 220344 6/9/2016 075657 075657 LOONEY, JAMIE (Continued) 220345 6/9/2016 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 953235 220346 6/9/2016 075425 MCARTHUR, AMELIA 5/5-5/26 GYM ATTEND 220347 6/9/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 61911916 61972347 63028609 220348 6/9/2016 075658 MICHAEL & CHRISTINE DUFFY 3-18765 220349 6/9/2016 075590 MOBILEGUARD INC 09653 PO # Description/Account Total: PM: GUARD, COVER, CYLINDER PM: GUARD, COVER, CYLINDER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 5/5-5/26/16 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTE 5/5-5/26/16 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total WWTP: EPDM GASKET& DOWN C( Mechanical Supplies: EPDM GASKE- 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 WWTP: BRASS SOLENOID VALVE BRASS SOLENOID VALVE 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 WWTP: MINIATURE STEEL BARBEL Mechanical Supplies: MINIATURE ST 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total #4245-2623714 UTILITY REFUND #4245-2623714 Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 Total 05-16 NETGUARD MONTHLY SERVI 4.3.a Page: 22 Page: 22 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 23 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220349 6/9/2016 075590 MOBILEGUARD INC (Continued) NetGuard Monthly Service Building 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 36.0( w NetGuard Monthly Service City Clerk 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 6.0( NetGuard Monthly Service Communit U E 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 6.0( '@ NetGuard Monthly Service Court U 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 6.0( o NetGuard Monthly Service Developm, 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 6.0( 0- NetGuard Monthly Service Engineerir a Q. 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 84.0( Q NetGuard Monthly Service Facilities c 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 42.0( M NetGuard Monthly Service Finance 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 6.0( co NetGuard Monthly Service Human Re 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 6.0( c NetGuard Monthly Service Informatioi o 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 48.0( Y NetGuard Monthly Service Mayor's 0- 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 6.0( NetGuard Monthly Service Parks 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 12.0( NetGuard Monthly Service Police 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 222.0( t NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water U 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 30.0( Q NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 6.0( NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 6.0( NetGuard Monthly Service PW Sewei 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 30.0( Page: 23 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220349 6/9/2016 075590 MOBILEGUARD INC 220350 220351 220352 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 6/9/2016 075608 NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC 5865 6/9/2016 075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING 6/9/2016 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 10048237 4.3.a Page: 24 PO # Description/Account Amoun NetGuard Monthly Service PW Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 6.0( Y NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 18.0( NetGuard Monthly Service PW Fleet E 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 6.0( '@ NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admir U 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.1( o NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admir 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 0.6( 0- NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admir a 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 Q. 2.1( Q NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admir c 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 0.6( M NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admir 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 0.6( w NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 9.0( c NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street o 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 9.0( Y NetGuard Monthly Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 30.0( Total: 642.0( CITIZENS SURVEY EXPANDED DES m Citizens survey expanded sample siz, E 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 5,220.0( u Total : 5,220.0( Q WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PR, WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PR, 125.000.64.575.50.41.00 1,906.2E Total : 1,906.2E NAVIA BENEFITS Page: 24 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 25 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220352 6/9/2016 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS (Continued) PARTICIPANT FEE _ 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 65.0( 6 MIN. FEE (FLEXI-COMMUTER) 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 25.0( 10050896 NAVIA BENEFITS E PARTICIPANT FEE 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 65.0( 6 MIN. FEE (FLEX I-COMMLITER) o 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 25.0( 5 Total: 180.0( o L Q 220353 6/9/2016 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0550033267 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET Q- Q HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 545.6z o 0550033268 YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET M YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 309.2' 0550033269 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC o HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC 0 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 39.01 N 0550033270 PINE ST PARK HONEY BUCKET cYi PINE ST PARK HONEY BUCKET E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 40.6E 19 0550033271 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET c 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 m 56.9: E 0550033272 FISH HATCHER HONEY BUCKET U FISH HATCHER HONEY BUCKET r 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 r 12.2( Q 0550033273 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B( CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B( 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 36.6( 0550033274 EDMONDS ELEMENTARY HONEY E EDMONDS ELEMENTARY HONEY E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 83.7z Page: 25 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 26 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220353 6/9/2016 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC (Continued) 0550033275 BALLINGER PARK HONEY BUCKET _ BALLINGER PARK HONEY BUCKET vi 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 83.7z 0550033276 MARINA BEACH HONEY BUCKET t MARINA BEACH HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1,469.4, 0550033277 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON p 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 44.7< 16- 0550033278 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON p CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON a 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 77.2E Q Total: 2,799.1� c 0 220354 6/9/2016 075612 NORTHWEST EXCAVATING &TRUCKING 9938 PM: MINI EXCAVATOR PM: MINI EXCAVATOR m 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 2,187.5( 9.8% Sales Tax c 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 214.3E c Total: 2,401.81 N 220355 6/9/2016 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 657 PLANNING BOARD MIN-5/25/16 E PLANNING BOARD MIN-5/25/16 c� 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 315.0( Total: 315.0( c m 220356 6/9/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 082211 FAC MAINT - MOUSE/KEYBOARD C E t Fac Maint - Mouse/Keyboard combo, U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 r 150.9� Q 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.7� 089850 PW - OFFICE SUPPLIES PW - Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 50.7( 9.8% Sales Tax Page: 26 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 27 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220356 6/9/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC (Continued) 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 4.9E _ 097265 PW - HANDHELD CALUCULATORS vi PW - Handheld Caluculators - Office 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 25.3( t 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.4E 120809 PW - OFFICE SUPPLIES PW - Office Supplies p 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 9.7z 9.8% Sales Tax p L 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 0.9( Q- 144530 INV#144530 ACCT#520437 250POL- Q' Q SHARPIE MARKERS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 0 11.6( M WHITE ADDRESS LABELS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 22.2( m RETRACTABLE BLACK PENS rn 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 59.1( c LAMINATE POUCH -LETTER SIZE c 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 39.5E Y STENO PADS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 21.0( . 9.8% Sales Tax c° 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 15.0E ; 149234 PW - BOOK ENDS SUPPLIES m PW - Book Ends Supplies E 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 23.1( u 9.8% Sales Tax r Q 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.2( 222794 P&R ADMIN: TISSUES P&R ADMIN: TISSUES 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 18.6� 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 1.81 Page: 27 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 28 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220356 6/9/2016 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC (Continued) Total: 474.5, 220357 6/9/2016 068282 OLYMPIC FLY FISHERS 21032 FLY FISHING 21032 FLY FISHING INSTRUCTION 21032 FLY FISHING INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 364.0( Total: 364.0( 220358 6/9/2016 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 237.1 £ 0060860 HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/ HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNT/ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 92.7� Total: 329.9 , 220359 6/9/2016 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 217669 STORM DUMP FEES Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 120.0( 220247 STORM DUMP FEES Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 24.0( 220349 STORM - DUMP FEES Storm - Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 120.0( Total: 264.0( 220360 6/9/2016 073070 PERRINE, JULIE 21112 CLAY EXPLORATI 21112 CLAY EXPLORATION INSTRU 21112 CLAY EXPLORATION INSTRU 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 165.0( Total: 165.0( 220361 6/9/2016 069633 PET PROS 0013995-IN INV 0013995-IN EDMONDS PD - OR DOG FOOD K9 HOBBS 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 142.4 1 9.9% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 14.1( Page: 28 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 29 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220361 6/9/2016 069633 069633 PET PROS (Continued) Total: 156.5, 220362 6/9/2016 073266 PILGRIM MEDIA SERVICES 32227 CEMETERY SOUND FOR MEMORIA CEMETERY SOUND FOR MEMORIA 130.000.64.536.20.41.00 300.0( Total: 300.0( 220363 6/9/2016 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC J555652 CITY PARK BLDG - SUPPLIES City Park Bldg - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 68.6 , 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.7: J555663 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.Oi 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.2( Total: 77.61 220364 6/9/2016 073150 POLLARD, ANDREA F 417 STORM - FLAGGING CLASS - M JOI Storm - Flagging Class - M Johnson, 422.000.72.531.90.43.00 100.0( Total: 100.0( 220365 6/9/2016 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 218471 WWTP: FED EX SHIP CHARGE TO I FED EX SHIP CHARGE TO DETECT 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 34.9, Total: 34.9, 220366 6/9/2016 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 ALARM MONITORING MEADOWDAI ALARM MONITORING CLUBHOUSE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 135.7i Total: 135.71 220367 6/9/2016 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 145.8' Page: 29 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220367 6/9/2016 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 (Continued) 3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : vi 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 29.5E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : t 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 112.3' PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; M 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 112.3' 6 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : o 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 112.3' PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; o L 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 112.3' 0- PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Q 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 112.2� c 3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; M FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 156.71 w 3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL a6 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL C 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 69.5, o Total : 963.1 i Y 220368 6/9/2016 075617 ROAD RESCUE ASPHALT 16700234 ROADWAY - ASPHALT E Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 389.7( Total: 389.7( m E 220369 6/9/2016 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 37045 ONSITE COMPUTER SUPPORT Onsite Computer Support 5/03/16 - 001.000.31.518.88.41.00 r 2,983.7E Q Total: 2,983.7E 220370 6/9/2016 074906 SITE WORKSHOP LLC 3858 VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE AR VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE AR 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 1,500.0( Page: 30 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220370 6/9/2016 074906 074906 SITE WORKSHOP LLC 220371 6/9/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 31 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Total : 1,500.0( 2003-2646-0 HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON vi HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON Y 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 18.5z 2005-9488-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 76TH AVE W E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.9( u 2011-0356-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI o TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 35.6 1 o 2011-8789-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W a TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W Q- Q 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 27.7E 2015-0127-7 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH F o 0 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH F Cl) 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 20.0< 2017-1178-5 STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ c 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 778.7( co 2021-9128-4 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212- o N PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212- Y 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 18.5z E 2022-5063-5 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M c� 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 18.5z c 2023-5673-9 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W E TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.2E 2025-2918-6 STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ Q STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 2,996.4E 2025-7615-3 STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS C STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS C 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 15,231.9, 2025-7948-8 STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 2 Page: 31 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220371 6/9/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 220372 220373 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 2025-7952-0 2047-1489-3 2047-1492-7 2047-1493-5 2047-1494-3 2047-1495-0 2053-0758-0 2207-9275-8 6/9/2016 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER May 2016 6/9/2016 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103584 4.3.a Page: 32 PO # Description/Account Amoun STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 350.0E w WWTP: EDMONDS - VARIOUS LOG Electric Unmetered special ContinuoL 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 9.4, STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 4.8, o STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 2 0 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 107.6' Q- STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 Q STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 0 56.7' M STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 10 STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 10 w 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 14.4, C6 STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 2 c STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 2 c 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 195.6E Y DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 128.3E TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME m 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 96.3, E Total: 20,142.8, U r Crime Victims Court Remittance Q Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 724.3 Total : 724.3 , WWTP: 200 2ND AVE S - RECYCLII\ Recycling for WWTP— Page: 32 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 220373 6/9/2016 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 103584 WWTP: 200 2ND AVE S - RECYCLIN Recycling for WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 103585 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 103586 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 103587 PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 103588 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 Total: 220374 6/9/2016 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3003448448 INV 3003448448 CUST # 6076358 MINIMUM MONTHLY SERVICE CHG 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 Total: 220375 6/9/2016 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18118705 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total 220376 6/9/2016 073970 TALLMAN, TYLER 5/3-5/31 GYM ATTEND 5/3-5/31/16 PICKLE -BALL GYM ATTE 5/3-5/31/16 PICKLE -BALL GYM ATTE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total 4.3.a Page: 33 Page: 33 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 34 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220377 6/9/2016 075660 THE MEYER IRREVOCABLE TRUST 2-36761 #4245-2593464 UTILITY REFUND #4245-2593464 Utility refund due to _ 411.000.233.000 223.7( vi Total: 223.7E a� t 220378 6/9/2016 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 427783 PM: SINK WALL FAUCET PM: SINK WALL FAUCET E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 392.7E 9.8% Sales Tax c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 38.4( -cu- Total: 431.21 p L Q 220379 6/9/2016 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR US53022 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUI Q ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEU 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 351.3 0 c 9.8% Sales Tax .. 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 34.4< US54073 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR °6 0 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 274.7 0 co 9.8% Sales Tax o N 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 26.9: Total: 687.5( E 220380 6/9/2016 062693 US BANK 3355 WSU - IMSA TRAINING & MANUALS WSU - R Hill IMSA Training 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 480.0( WSU - R Newkirk IMSA Training t 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 480.0( cvv WSU - Skylar Merback IMSA Training r Q 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 480.0( WSU - B Clemens IMSA Training 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 480.0( IMSA - Study Manuals for Training (4) 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 87.6< IMSA- Study Manuals for Training (4) Page: 34 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 35 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220380 6/9/2016 062693 US BANK (Continued) 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 262.8E Total: 2,270.5' 220381 6/9/2016 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9765861253 C/A571242650-0001 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bid Dept 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 339.1 , iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 55.8� iPhone/iPad Cell Service Econ 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 75.7E iPad Cell Service Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 300.1( iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 75.8E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Developmei 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 95.7 , iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 932.5z iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering 001.000.67.518.21.35.00 808.9( iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 91.6< iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 95.71 iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 95.71 iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 369.5E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor's Offi 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 95.7 1 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Dept 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 80.0, iPhone/iPad Cell Service Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 1.102.1 z Page: 35 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor 220381 6/9/2016 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 36 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) Air cards Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 1,072.3z Y iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning De 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 40.0' iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin U E 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 26.5E '@ iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin U 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 7.5� o iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin U 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 26.5( o iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin a Q. 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 7.5� Q iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin c 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 7.5E M iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Street C 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 171.6E m iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Fleet 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 55.7( c iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/, o 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 120.8, Y iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/, 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 120.8z iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer Dept ca 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 185.9, iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 281.6E t iPad Cell Service Storm U 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 155.9( Q iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 198.3, 9765987396 C/A 772540262-00001 Lift Station access 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 74.8< Page: 36 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 37 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220381 6/9/2016 067865 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) Total: 7,168.7, 220382 6/9/2016 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 8045067076 WWTP: BOTTLE ECONO PP WM 10 BOTTLE ECONO PP WM 1000ML C: 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 109.5( 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.7� 8045072735 WWTP: GLOVE EST NTRL, UW PO\ WWTP: GLOVE EST NTRL, UW PO\ 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 540.3, 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 52.9( Total: 713.6( 220383 6/9/2016 062320 WA STARTS ALLIANCE FDN WSAA2016 MEMBERSHIP WSAA2016 MEMBERSHIP WSAA2016 MEMBERSHIP 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 100.0( Total: 100.0( 220384 6/9/2016 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 55776 INV#55776- EDMONDS PD TOW 2008 TOYOTA #829YXU 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 166.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 16.2 , 55819 INV#55819 - EDMONDS PD TOW 2007 HYUNDI #AQN3669 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 166.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 16.2 , Tota I : 364.5� 220385 6/9/2016 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 116008569 INV 116008569 EDM301 -MAY 2016 BACKGROUND CHECKS - MAY 2011 001.000.237.100 309.7E Total: 309.7E 220386 6/9/2016 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 116-178 STREET - 10TH & ALDER FIR TREE Page: 37 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 38 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 220386 6/9/2016 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS (Continued) Street - 10th & Alder Fir Tree Remove _ 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 480.0( 6 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 a� 47.0z Total: 527.01 E 220387 6/9/2016 045912 WASPC INV026953 INV026953 EDMONDS - SPRING CC WASPC SPRING CONF - COMPAAN o 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 300.0( Total: 300.0( p L 220388 6/9/2016 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 9581693 FAC MAINT - BLEACH, HAND SOAP Q Q Fac Maint - Bleach, Hand Soap, TOWE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,829.8z c 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total: 2,009.1( m 220389 6/9/2016 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 7042 UTILITY BILLING - #9 ENVELOPES ( rn C w Utility Billing - #9 Envelopes (5000), 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 N 215.E 1 Utility Billing - #9 Envelopes (5000), E 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 215.E i 'M Utility Billing - #9 Envelopes (5000), 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 215.6( 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 21.1 z t 9.8% Sales Tax cvv 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 r 21.1 z Q 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 21.1: 7052 PAPER SUPPLIES Paper Supplies 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 34.3z 9.8% Sales Tax Page: 38 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 06/09/2016 9:23:01 AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 220389 6/9/2016 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 111 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 111 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 39 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 3.3 1 Total: 748.1: vi 0 Bank total : 222,149.41 Total vouchers : 222,149.41 E U 4- 0 Page: 39 Packet Pg. 68 c� 0 L Q Q Q 0 0 M t0 C6 O to O N Y V E V a+ C d E M V R r r Q 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD ui STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA t WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC U E STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA o STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA 0 SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC 0. a SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA Q STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB �o WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4J13 rn STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA G W 0 SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC L WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC a� WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB Z_ SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA ° a WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD D, STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB a� 0 WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3JB a a� L STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC LL STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD r E STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB c� STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA Q STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1 CA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 69 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 ElFM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC ui General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB t FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB U E WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA o PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA 0 0 STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD Q. a SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB Q STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB o M SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC to STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA T_ rn STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA G W 0 STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE L STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG a� STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN Z_ STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC ° a FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD D, WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA 0 STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB a a� L STR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB u_ STR SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) s014 E6AA r E UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA c� STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG Q STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-1 05th/l 06th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 70 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Protect Funding Protect Title Number Number WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 71 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title E1AA * c34" Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STIR ElCA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c354 Sunset Walkway Improvement STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STIR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvement STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STIR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c423 W38th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School STIR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E3J13 c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC STIR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program 2014 Chip Seals 91a" WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays 220th Street Overlay Project STIR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basild STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 72 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) 4.3.b Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title - E4HA rddF Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program 2016 Water Comp Plan Updat FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades City Spray Park EFW FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab Trackside Warning System STIR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming 2015 Overlay Progra WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays 2015 Sewerline Overlays STIR E5DA 0474 Bikelink Project Waterfront Access Analysis STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements SWR E5GA c469 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Prod SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study �P Outfall Pipe Modificatio WTR E5JA c468 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Proiects Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) WTR E51KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating EV Upgrades - Council Cham UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates 2016 Overlay Program i WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays 2016 Sewerline Overlays STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to E6FA Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements UTILITIES E6JA s013 STIR E7AC i005 m013 PM E7MA c276 8MA c282 3rd Ave Rain Gardens Utility Rate Update SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) Dayton Street Plaza Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 73 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1 FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM EYE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements STM E41FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program WTR E4,113 c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC E41-A c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays ui U m t v E 2 U 0 0 L Q a a 0 0 M r Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 74 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title STIR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STIR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study ui U am STIR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STIR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program E 2 STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects WTR E5JA c468 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects o L SWR E5GA c469 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects C STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System 0 STIRE5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming M r STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating d6 0 STIR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project W 0 WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays L a� FAC E5LA c476 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers E General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis 3 Z STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility d WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) 2, STM E51FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) a a� STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements Li STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays E t STIR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program Q WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays STM E61FA iol 1 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates SWR E5GB sol l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STIR E6AA s014 SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 75 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number FAC AN Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E41-A General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E41FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E51FA STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 ElFM STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E21FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E31FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STIR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC STIR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STIR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STIR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA STIR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB STIR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA ui U m t v E 2 U 0 0 L Q a a 0 0 M r Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 76 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i0o5 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 ElCA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB STR SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) s014 E6AA STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3JB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA ui U m t v E 2 U 0 0 L Q a a 0 0 M r Revised 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 77 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Students Saving Salmon Presentation (30 min.) Staff Lead: Val Stewart Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History Council approved $5,000 in the 2016 Budget for this project. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Edmonds-Woodway High School students concerned about our environment, especially the salmon and their habitat, formed a club called "Students Saving Salmon." Students in the club have learned about the watersheds in Edmonds with a goal to see historic salmon runs re-established in Edmonds and make our local environment better for people and salmon. The City's "Willow Creek Daylighting" project has motivated students to become involved in salmon restoration efforts. Last October, the 'Students Saving Salmon' club made a presentation to the Edmonds City Council on the kick-off of a citizen science project, called the Edmonds Stream Team, to monitor the quality of water in the Edmonds Marsh, Shellabarger Creek, Willow Creek and Shell Creek. The project includes collecting water samples for dissolved metal analysis at an accredited Lab and for fecal coliform bacteria analysis at the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant Laboratory. Since then, students in the 'Edmonds Stream Team' have diligently collected data each month at 16 field sites, participated in government processes and community enhancement efforts, created informational materials and news articles, and made presentations at community meetings. As the school year is coming to a close, students are now prepared to fulfill their commitment to the Council to come back and present preliminary results of the Edmonds Stream Team project. A comprehensive written report on the Edmonds Stream Team citizen science project is attached. We appreciate the Council's support of this citizen science project which has given students actual field experience in an environmental study which they can carry into college and science careers. Funding provided by the City helped this volunteer community program purchase essential calibrating fluids for instruments, outreach materials, and needed field equipment and supplies. Attachments: Edmonds Stream Team Monitoring Report Packet Pg. 78 6.1.a EDMONDS WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROJECT PRELIMINARY REPORT October 2015 to May 2016 EDMONDS -WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SAVING SALMON EDMONDS STREAM TEAM Joe Scordino, Project Leader (Volunteer) Rondi Nordal, Afua Tiwaa, Fatima Fatty and Arisbeth Acosta - Shell Creek Team Pavi Chance and Lindsey Barnes - Shellabarger Creek Team Sam Kleven, Joe Cooper and Justin Heckt - Willow Creek Team Emily McLaughlin Sta. Maria, Katharina Brinschwitz, YeJi Oh and Autumn Beeghley - Marsh Team Valerie Stewart and Peggy Foreman - Volunteer Advisors; Dave Millette - EWHS Science Teacher June 2016 Packet Pg. 79 6.1.a TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................................6 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Edmonds Watersheds and Creeks...............................................................................................................8 EdmondsMarsh.............................................................................................................................. 8 WillowCreek...................................................................................................................................9 ShellabargerCreek.........................................................................................................................9 ShellCreek.......................................................................................................................................9 WaterQuality Parameters.........................................................................................................................10 WaterTemperature......................................................................................................................10 DissolvedOxygen..........................................................................................................................11 pH...........................................................................................................................................12 Conductivity, Total Dissolved Solids, Salinity............................................................................12 Nutrients........................................................................................................................................13 Dissolved Metals and Petroleum Compounds...........................................................................................13 FecalColiform Bacteria..............................................................................................................................15 Macroinvertebrates.....................................................................................................................................15 METHODS.................................................................................................................................................................15 Monitoring Locations and Schedule..........................................................................................................15 MonitoringEquipment...............................................................................................................................16 Water Quality Parameters Monitored......................................................................................................16 Data Collection, Management and Quality Control.................................................................................17 Lab analysis for dissolved metals and petroleum compounds.................................................................18 Lab analysis for fecal coliform bacteria....................................................................................................18 Collecting and identifying macroinvertebrates.........................................................................................19 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Waterquality trends...................................................................................................................................20 FecalColiform Bacteria..............................................................................................................................28 Dissolved Metals and Petroleum Compounds...........................................................................................30 Macroinvertebrates..................................................................................................................................... 33 CommunityOutreach.................................................................................................................................33 DISCUSSION............................................................................................................................................................. 34 RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................................................................................................35 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.........................................................................................................................................36 REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................................................37 APPENDIX 1. CITY OF EDMONDS WATERSHEDS........................................................................................40 APPENDIX 2. MONITORING SITES...................................................................................................................41 APPENDIX 3. DATA SHEET.................................................................................................................................42 2 Packet Pg. 80 6.1.a 1*14DIOLNILIIVAWIN UlUI:1:3'1 Edmonds-Woodway High School students in the Students Saving Salmon club volunteered to collect monthly water quality measurements starting at the beginning of the 2015/2016 school year from several streams that flow through or near the downtown area of Edmonds. This citizen science project, called the Edmonds Stream Team, was initiated because water quality data from Edmonds streams and the Marsh is lacking and there are concerns about the health of our streams and how stream water quality including stormwater may be affecting aquatic organisms and salmon. Students monitored and collected data on upstream and downstream sites in Willow Creek, Shell Creek, Shellabarger Creek, and the Edmonds Marsh for water quality parameters that are important for aquatic organism survival. Water samples were also collected seasonally for lab analysis for dissolved metals, petroleum -derived compounds, and fecal coliform bacteria. Macroinvertebrate sampling and identification occurred at upper Shell Creek assisted by staff from Sound Salmon Solutions. A total of 16 sites were designated for monitoring (see map in Appendix 1) to ensure a representative sample of each stream and the Marsh. Sites were monitored by four Stream Teams, with two to four students each, during the first two weeks of each month from October 2015 to May 2016. Students used a YSI Professional Plus instrument to collect measurements for water temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxygen saturation, pH, conductivity, specific conductance, total dissolved solids, salinity and nitrates. Monitoring site data including air temperature, water depth, stream width, clarity, vegetation, bottom substrate were also collected. All data were recorded on a standardized data sheet and then entered into a Google Drive database. Quality control measures included filed monitoring protocols, repeat samples and review/editing of database entries. The database is available for public access at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/lKeA6zoxVKim Og semyQJVgPJVemSBh74R- yON3BAe1 Y/edit#gid=1161067171 This preliminary report summarizes the results for the first eight months (October 2015 to May 2016) of this project. The primary water parameters - water temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen - were collected at each site each month and the recorded measurements were evaluated against the Washington State Water Quality Criteria for freshwater aquatic life (see Washington Administrative Code 173-201A-030). Average water temperatures in the three creeks ranged from 51.0'F in the fall to 49.1'F in the winter to 53.8'F in the spring. These temperatures are below the maximum temperature requirement of 60.8'F for salmon in the Washington Administrative Code. Summer temperatures will be assessed when collected. Dissolved oxygen levels in the three creeks ranged from a low of 9.3 mg/L to a high of 12.5 mg/L which are well above the 1-day minimum requirement of 8.0 mg/L in the Washington Administrative Code for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration. Higher dissolved oxygen levels are more critical in Shell Creek than the other two creeks because salmon do spawn in the lower reaches of the Shell Creek. Salmon eggs in the gravel in the winter in Shell Creek require higher dissolved oxygen levels than specified in the Wash. Admin. Code to grow and hatch. The dissolved oxygen levels measured in lower Shell Creek were 11.0 mg/L in November, 11.4 mg/L in December, 11.2 mg/L in January and 12.1 mg/L in February. Thus, the measured dissolved oxygen levels in lower Shell Creek were within the optimum levels necessary for chum salmon eggs. Overall, lower Packet Pg. 81 6.1.a Shell Creek averaged 11.0 mg/L dissolved oxygen for all months (October to May) while upper Shell Creek averaged 9.6 mg/L over all months. The pH level in the three creeks generally stayed constant through the eight months averaging pH 7.7 except for a December decline in all streams down to an average pH 7.2 probably caused by heavy rainfall since rain tends to be more acidic (pH 5.6) than stream water. All of the observed pH levels in the creeks were within the pH 6.5 to 8.5 range in the Washington Administrative Code that is suitable for salmon. Heavy rainfall in December also resulted in reduced conductivity readings at all sites since rainwater contains less ions (thus lower conductivity) than stream water. Nitrate levels in all three creeks were low averaging 1.3 mg/L for six months (October to March) with a high of 2.3 mg/L in February (which was also the month with highest average nitrate levels at 2.0 mg/L). The main water body flowing through the Edmonds Marsh (from Shellabarger inlet at the Hwy 104 culverts to the Marsh outlet) had dissolved oxygen averaging 9.4 mg/L that exceeded minimal requirements for all months with a high of 11.3 mg/L in April and low of 7.9 mg/L in October. However, dissolved oxygen measured on the northern edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square was too low (averaging 1.8 mg/L) for salmon survival in all months except March when it increased to 7.1 mg/L. Water temperature at all sites in the Marsh exhibited the expected trend of decreasing temperatures in the fall (average 54.2°F from October to early December) with winter lows (average 47.6°F for January to early March) and increases into spring (average 58.5 °F from April to May). There was an unexpected high water temperature reading of 68.5 °F at the Marsh outlet on May 1 Oth, which was confirmed with a replicate sample. The high reading was very different from the May water temperatures of the Shellabarger inlet which was 57.7°F and the lower Willow Creek incoming flow which was 56.1'F. The high reading in May may be an artifact of monitoring the Marsh outlet at the end of a very low tide cycle when most of the Marsh waters had drained down to very low levels. The edges of the Edmonds Marsh along Harbor Square were more acidic (average pH 6.61) than the main flow through the Marsh from the Shellabarger inlet at the Hwy 104 culverts to the Marsh outlet (average pH 7.31) in all months. One site along Harbor Square in January had a measured pH of 6.47 and that was the only Marsh site that wasn't within the WA Water Quality Standard of between pH 6.5 and pH 8.5. Salinity measurements at the Marsh outlet (which is representative of the main body of the Marsh) from December to early March (averaging 0.14 ppt) reflect the low salinity of the incoming freshwater from the Shellabarger inlet and lower Willow Creek (both having average salinity of 0.11 ppt for all months). But, when the tide gate is secured open (from mid -March to mid -October), the salinity measurements were significantly greater in the Marsh with 9.76 ppt salinity in October, 6.8 ppt in April and 3.2 ppt in May. The ecological functions and environmental benefits of this estuarine wetland would be enhanced by keeping the tidegate secured open year-round and moving forward with the Willow Creek Daylighting project to open a tidal channel to Puget Sound that will allow full and uninhibited tidal exchange in the Edmonds Marsh. Water samples for fecal coliform bacteria analysis were collected from 14 monitoring sites in February and 11 sites in April. The lower Shellabarger Creek, the Shellabarger Marsh, the Shellabarger inlet to the Edmonds Marsh, and the Edmonds Marsh outlet sites all had counts of fecal coliform bacteria exceeding 100 colonies/100 mL in one or both months sampled. In contrast, the upper and lower Willow and Shell 4 Packet Pg. 82 6.1.a Creek sites had an average fecal coliform count of 29 colonies in Shell Creek and 10 colonies in Willow Creek. Although there are no Washington Water Quality Standards for fecal coliform for freshwater aquatic life, the high levels observed may exceed the Washington criteria for water contact recreation (i.e., levels must not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 mL in areas used by swimmers), thus indicating a potential water quality problem (even though these waters are not used by swimmers). Further, and likely more intense, sampling for fecal coliform is needed to better understand the elevated fecal coliform levels in Shellabarger. Water samples for dissolved metals were collected in the fall (October 2015), winter (January 2016) and spring (April 2016) from lower creek sites and the Edmonds Marsh. All sites had very low levels of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cooper, iron, lead, and zinc detected in the samples. Mercury was not detected at any of the sites. Iron (which was analyzed only in the winter samples) and zinc had higher levels detected than the other metals, but the levels were below the Washington standards. Water samples for petroleum -derived compounds were collected in the fall (October 2015), winter (January 2016) and spring (April 2016) from lower creek sites and the Edmonds Marsh. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were detected at all sites sampled in all three seasons (fall, winter and spring). For those sites sampled in all three seasons, they each had all three types of petroleum hydrocarbons - diesel, oil, and volatile range - detected in at least one of the season samples except the lower Willow Creek site which had no volatile range TPH detected in any sample. Lab analyses for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were limited to five samples from the Marsh outlet in all three seasons (fall, winter, spring) and at lower Willow Creek and the eastern Marsh edge in the fall due to the cost of the lab analysis. None of the 18 types of PAH analyzed for were detected at levels greater than 0.016 µg/L. Stream biomonitoring using the presence of benthic (bottom dwelling) macroinvertebrates as a biotic indicators of stream health and water quality was conducted in upper Shell Creek in early May. Macroinvertebrates (i.e., insect larvae, crustaceans (amphipods, isopods) and mollusks (snails) that are visible to the naked eye) were collected and identified. Since some benthic macroinvertebrates cannot survive in polluted water while others can survive or even thrive in polluted water, the presence/absence of the different macroinvertebrates was used as a relative indicator of water quality. About 15 different macroinvertebrates, with varying pollutant tolerance, were found in the Shell Creek sample resulting in an index rating of `good' water quality. The first eight months of the project has demonstrated that a citizen science project utilizing volunteer high school students can be successful in collecting high quality scientific data while providing students hands- on experience in conducting field science. The current water quality monitoring project should continue is so annual trends can be evaluated and baseline information established. Having a long term data series will allow for future comparisons to potential environmental or pollutant driven perturbations and potential effects of climate change. The water quality of Shell Creek, which has a wild spawning run of chum salmon, needs to be kept optimal for salmon. Other creeks, such as Shellabarger Creek, although impacted by development and piped channels, also needs to have good water quality not only for potential salmon use in remaining usable salmon habitat, but to ensure the watershed contributes to good water quality in downstream areas such as the Marsh and Puget Sound. Actions that may be taken in Edmonds to maintain or improve water quality and habitat conditions are provided in the recommendations section of this report. Packet Pg. 83 6.1.a INTRODUCTION This preliminary report summarizes the results from the first eight months of a citizen science project, called the Edmonds Stream Team, conducted by Edmonds -Woodway High School (EWHS) students in the Students Saving Salmon club. Students volunteered to conduct monthly water quality monitoring in several Edmonds streams and the Edmonds Marsh to determine the condition of these waters and whether the quality of water may be affecting aquatic life and salmon. The City of Edmonds has several creeks draining into Puget Sound that may support salmon, but unfortunately there is little baseline data on water quality in these streams nor information on whether stormwater and other runoff may be affecting the ability of these streams to support salmon. There was one instance of a die -off of juvenile coho salmon in May of 2004 at the Willow Creek Hatchery that was attributed to potential stormwater pollutants in Willow Creek after a rainstorm, but no water quality data was available to evaluate it (Seattle Times, May 26, 2004). To address the lack of water quality data, the Edmonds Stream Team, a citizen science project with volunteer high school students from the EWHS Students Saving Salmon club, was implemented. In December of 2014, local community members knowledgeable in salmon and environmental issues partnered with EWHS science teachers, the City of Edmonds Public Works Department, EarthCorps, and Sound Salmon Solutions to design and implement a student program to determine the condition of the Edmonds Marsh and several Edmonds streams that flow through or near downtown Edmonds. This citizen science project, called the Edmonds Stream Team, was designed to train and support EWHS students in the collection of high quality scientific information on water quality and assist the students in using the resulting data to engage in community efforts to address water quality, stormwater and wildlife habitat issues in Edmonds. EWHS students in the Students Saving Salmon club formed volunteer stream teams that have participated in the Edmonds Stream Team since the beginning of the 2015/2016 school year. The Students Saving Salmon club was formed in 2014 by EWHS students concerned about their environment, especially salmon and their habitat. To achieve their goal of fostering and reestablishing salmon runs in Edmonds, students in the club wanted to learn more about Edmonds watersheds and conservation/restoration efforts so they could encourage measures that will make the local environment better for people and salmon. The City of Edmonds' ongoing restoration work in the Edmonds Marsh to improve salmon access and provide juvenile salmon rearing habitat (called the "Willow Creek Daylighting Project") by constructing an open daylighted tidal channel (Shannon and Wilson, Inc. 2013) motivated students to become involved in community efforts to restore salmon. The Students Saving Salmon club objectives are to participate in city government processes and community habitat enhancement efforts; develop educational materials and news articles; and, participate in projects, such as the Edmonds Stream Team citizen science project, to collect and disseminate scientific information on the environment. 6 Packet Pg. 84 6.1.a Stream monitoring programs are essential for assessing current conditions and tracking changes in water quality over time to identify potential problems and/or determine if community actions have been successful. Unfortunately, city and state staff and funding resources are limited, and stream monitoring in urban areas such as Edmonds cannot be implemented without volunteer support. Thus, the Edmonds Stream Team citizen science project was designed to provide important baseline information to city and state government agencies to assist in environmental assessments and decision -making. The Edmonds Stream team not only collected data on basic water parameters, but also conducted bacterial monitoring for fecal coliform, biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates, and sampling water for dissolved metals and petroleum- derived compounds. This citizen science project also provides a great opportunity for high school students to become involved in field science and gain greater understanding of environmental issues. When a stream falls outside healthy levels, it can have devastating effects on the organisms inhabiting that stream. The influx of stormwater and other environmental conditions can change the health of streams. High influxes of nitrates from nitrogen fertilizers can lead to algal blooms; once the algae dies off, it depletes the stream of oxygen, preventing fish from surviving there. Temperatures elevated above the levels that can support salmon will cause salmon to leave in search of cooler waters. Good water quality is essential to maintaining the presence of salmon in streams. Salmon transfer nutrients obtained in the ocean (marine derived nutrients) up rivers; when salmon die in a stream, they serve as a fertilizer for nearby plants and enrich both forest and stream ecosystems. Maintaining the health of the waters of rivers, streams, and the Puget Sound is also important to our economy. The commercial, recreational and tribal salmon fishing groups are a major economic asset to the Puget Sound region, and their continuation and the recovery of salmon are reliant on the quality of the Puget Sound's fresh and marine waters. Stormwater runoff is one of the largest pollutants of streams and the Puget Sound. When people use lawn fertilizer, wash their car on impervious surfaces, have car leaks, or fail to pick up after their dog, they introduce contaminants to the environment. When it rains, these contaminants are washed into streams and the Puget Sound, where they may prove toxic for many organisms and can have devastating effects on river and ocean ecosystems. Recent studies have documented unexpected mortality of pre -spawn adult coho salmon as they enter streams in Puget Sound. Although stormwater is considered the likely cause of mortality, the specific toxins in the stormwater that may be responsible have not been identified (Scholz et al. 2011, Spromberg 2015). Streamside habitat is also a critical factor for stream quality; when trees grow alongside a stream, they secure the banks and prevent excess sediments in the stream and provide shade that helps keep streams cool and oxygenated for the aquatic insect larvae which comprise the diet of salmon. Nonetheless, water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and nutrients are among the basic characteristics of stream water that can be used to determine the quality of the stream and assess changes that may occur due to stormwater influx and environmental conditions Packet Pg. 85 6.1.a BACKGROUND Edmonds Watersheds and Creeks Watersheds in the City of Edmonds are made up of small creeks or underground pipes that drain directly to Puget Sound or to the east into Lake Ballinger (which flows to Lake Washington and then to Puget Sound). Many creeks in Edmonds flow in a combination of open stream channels and underground pipes. The underground pipes collect flows from storm drains located along paved streets and parking lots and connect them to streams or large pipes that flow directly to Puget Sound. In some Edmonds watersheds, flows are in underground pipes most of the way to Puget Sound. Edmonds also has several wetlands that provide wildlife habitat including the Edmonds Marsh, Good Hope Pond, Shell Creek Marsh, and wetlands adjacent to the creeks. A map showing the Edmonds Watersheds and Creeks is provided in Appendix A. All Edmonds creeks are designated as Type F (streams that contain fish habitat) in the Edmonds City Development Code (EDCD) in section 23.90.010. None of the Edmonds creeks are designated as "shorelines of the state" because they do not meet the 20 cubic -foot -per -second annual flow threshold for classification as a water of the state (Sea Run Consultants et al. 2007). The EDCD 23.90.010 lists the following creeks as those which anadromous fish species (fish born in freshwater that migrate to the ocean to grow into adults, and then return to spawn in freshwater streams) are known to occur: Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek, Hindley Creek, Perrinville Creek, and Lunds Gulch Creek. Since the Edmonds Marsh is currently the focus of a major City of Edmonds restoration project, called the "Willow Creek Daylighting" project, the Edmonds Stream Team citizen science project was designed to focus on the Edmonds Marsh and the two creeks (Willow and Shellabarger) that flow into the Marsh so that pre -restoration project baseline data are collected. By including Shell Creek, which currently has spawning salmon return each year, the project covers water quality for the downtown area of Edmonds. Edmonds Marsh The Edmonds Marsh, located on the west side of Highway 104 south of downtown Edmonds, receives drainage from Shellabarger Creek Basin (378 acres), the Willow Creek Basin (393 acres), and another 61 acres from local areas (i.e., Harbor Square, adjacent Highway 104 storm drains, and the old UnoCal site) that drain into the Marsh (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). The Edmonds Marsh drains to Puget Sound through a channelized portion of Willow Creek at the southwest end of the Marsh. The channel passes through two large culverts under the railroad tracks into an open basin and then into a 48 inch pipe that passes through a tide gate and extends1,275 feet before draining into the lower intertidal area of Marina Beach (Sea -Run Consulting et al. 2007). The tide gate functions to prevent tidal saltwater intrusion into the Marsh from mid -October through mid -March to avoid flooding potential when high tides coincide with heavy rainfall; during the spring and summer months the Packet Pg. 86 6.1.a tide gate is opened so that the Marsh is tidally influenced. The 23 acre Edmonds Marsh is a City of Edmonds Park managed by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. Willow Creek Willow Creek flows through a largely residential area draining a 393-acre basin area of which 183 acres are in Edmonds and the remaining acreage in Woodway (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). Willow Creek starts in Edmonds and flows through Woodway before draining into the Edmonds Marsh on the west side of SR 104 just north of Pine Street (adjacent to the Willow Creek Hatchery). Willow Creek is reported to contain coho salmon, cutthroat trout, and, historically, chum salmon (CH2M HILL 2004). Juvenile salmon were observed in Willow Creek in 2016, but these may have been releases from the Willow Creek Hatchery. The current 1,275 foot entrance pipe to Willow Creek/Marsh from Puget Sound (in subtidal area) likely precludes most adult salmon passage into the Marsh and creeks. Shellabarger Creek Shellabarger Creek drains a 378-acre basin area (called the "Edmonds Bowl") and flows into the Shellabarger Marsh (a name we have coined for the marsh located within several private properties on the east side of Highway 104) which then drains into the Edmonds Marsh through two large culverts under Highway 104. The Shellabarger Creek corridor is heavily developed. The stream passes through culverts in many locations and most of the open reaches are located in landscaped residential areas (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). Information on fish use of Shellabarger Creek is limited as WDFW has not conducted fish surveys in the creek. Resident cutthroat are likely present, and the creek is accessible to anadromous fish that use Edmonds Marsh (Sea -Run Consulting et al. 2007). Similar to Willow Creek though, the current 1,275 pipe outlet to Puget Sound likely precludes adult salmon from entering the Marsh and thus upstream to Shellabarger Creek. However, there was a possible adult salmon occurrence in the upper middle fork of Shellabarger Creek in the fall of 2014 based on the description of a fish observed upstream of culvert on 7th Avenue; it was either a coho salmon or a large cutthroat trout (My Edmonds News article; February 14, 2015). Shell Creek The Shell Creek basin comprises a drainage area of 821 acres, which includes the 178-acre Hindley Creek subbasin (Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds 2010). Hindley Creek empties into Shell Creek west of Brookmere Drive just north of Caspers Street. Both Shell Creek and Hindley Creek have diversion structures that convey high flows directly into Puget Sound via a pipe system. The Shell Creek diversion structure and a fish ladder are located on Daley Street east of 7th Avenue. The Hindley Creek bypass begins at 9th Avenue N 9 Packet Pg. 87 6.1.a and Hindley Lane, where it enters the same pipe used for the Shell Creek bypass. Shell Creek flows through several undeveloped areas including Yost Park at the upper end of the creek and an open area on private property at the terminal end of the creek just east of the railroad tracks. The Shell Creek Marsh is located just north of Shell Creek at its terminal area east of the tracks. Adult chum salmon were observed in lower Shell Creek in November 2015. Lower Shell Creek residents have reported seeing adult salmon in Shell Creek each year from late October to early December. WDFW has not conducted any recent fish surveys in the Shell Creek, but their biologists counted six chum salmon carcasses in the lower reach of Shell Creek during a November 2002 survey. Other biologists reported both coho and chum salmon spawning in lower Shell Creek in 2000 and 2001 (Sea -Run Consulting et al. 2007). Water Quality Parameters The Edmonds Stream Team collected data on water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, dissolved oxygen saturation, conductivity, specific conductance, total dissolved solids, salinity and nitrates. A description of each parameter and why it is important to aquatic organisms follows. Water Temperature Water temperature is a standard water parameter collected because it is the most critical factor influencing biological and chemical conditions in water. The solubility of oxygen, other gases and some compounds change with water temperature thus changing their effects on aquatic organisms. Colder water holds more oxygen and as water temperature increases, the capacity of water to hold dissolved oxygen becomes lower. If water is too warm, it will not hold enough oxygen for aquatic organisms to survive. Increasing water temperature not only increases the solubility of toxic compounds such as heavy metals, but it can also influence an organism's tolerance limits. For example, aquatic organism mortality rates for zinc are significantly higher at temperatures above 25°C (77°F) than at temperatures below 20°C (68°F). Water temperature also affects the metabolic rates and biological activity of aquatic organisms and influences their chosen habitats as well as behavioral choices, such as moving to warmer or cooler water after feeding (Kemker 2014). Water temperature can be affected by many environmental conditions such as sunlight/solar radiation, heat transfer from the atmosphere, stream habitat, and turbidity. Shallow and surface waters are more easily influenced by these factors than deep water. Man-made influences on water temperature include runoff, riparian habitat alterations (e.g., building structures, removing/altering vegetation), large wood removal, thermal pollution, and impoundments. Salmon require a supply of cold and clean water for optimal survival success. While water temperature requirements vary depending on salmonid species and life stage, generally salmonids require stream temperatures less than 17.8°C (64°F) for successful migration and rearing and less than 15.6°C (60°F) for spawning. Studies vary on optimum and preferred temperatures; a study 10 Packet Pg. 88 6.1.a on coho and Chinook by Stein et al. (1972) reports optimal growth for juvenile salmon in freshwater occurs in water temperatures of 9 ° to 13 ° C (48.2 ° to 55.4 °F). Stream water temperatures above 17.8 °C (64°F) cause additional stress and reduce survival while long term exposure to water temperatures higher than 24°C (75 °F) are fatal to salmonids (Kerwin 2001). Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen (DO) is a very important parameter in assessing water quality because of its influence on the organisms living within a body of water. DO is the amount of oxygen that is dissolved in water at a given temperature. Oxygen concentrations are much higher in air (about 21%) than in water (>1 %). This difference in concentration causes oxygen molecules in the air to dissolve into the water. More oxygen dissolves more quickly through aeration caused by wind (creating waves), rapids, waterfalls, ground water discharge or other forms of running water. Dissolved oxygen also enters water through plant photosynthesis. There are many different factors that affect the amount of dissolved oxygen in water, the main one being temperature. Cold water can hold more oxygen than warm water. Warmer water becomes "saturated" more easily with oxygen, but it actually holds less oxygen. For example, if water becomes too warm in the summer months, the dissolved oxygen levels may become suboptimal for fish even if the water is 100% saturated with oxygen. Rivers and streams tend to stay near or slightly above 100 percent air saturation due to relatively large surface areas, aeration from rapids, and groundwater discharge. While groundwater usually has low DO levels, groundwater -fed streams can hold more oxygen due to the influx of colder water and the mixing it causes. Also, as the salinity of water increases, its ability to dissolve oxygen decreases; so saltwater holds less oxygen than freshwater. Dissolved oxygen is necessary for many forms of aquatic life including fish, invertebrates, bacteria and plants. These organisms use oxygen in respiration, similar to organisms on land. The amount of dissolved oxygen needed varies from creature to creature. While some bottom feeders, crabs, oysters and worms can survive on low levels of DO (1-6 mg/L), most fish need higher levels of 4-15 mg/L (Kemker 2014). The mean dissolved oxygen level necessary for adult salmonids is 6.5 mg/L, and the minimum is 4 mg/L. The Washington Administrative Code sets a 1-day minimum requirement of 8.0 mg/L for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration. Salmon generally attempt to avoid areas where dissolved oxygen is less than 5 mg/L and will begin to die if exposed to dissolved oxygen levels less than 3 mg/L for more than a few days. For salmon eggs, dissolved oxygen levels below 11 mg/L will delay their hatching, and below 8 mg/L will impair their growth and lower their survival rates. When dissolved oxygen falls below 6 mg/L, the majority of salmon eggs will die (Carter 2005). 11 Packet Pg. 89 6.1.a pH The pH of a stream determines the solubility of nutrients and chemicals in the water thus affecting the aquatic organism in the water. pH is the measure of the hydrogen ion concentration in water with 7 being neutral. Solutions with a pH above 7.0 are considered basic or alkaline, and solutions with a pH below 7.0 are considered acidic. Acidic water (low pH) dissolves nutrients and chemicals at a greater rate thereby making them more available for uptake by plants and animals, while a high pH can make nutrients insoluble and therefore unavailable to plants and animals. However, a very low pH (very acidic) can dissolve heavy metals, and make pollutants bio- available. There are many factors that can affect pH in water, both natural and man-made. Most natural changes occur due to interactions with surrounding rock (particularly carbonate forms) and other materials. The pH of water can be affected by rain which is slightly acidic (pH of 5.6) because rainfall naturally interacts with carbon dioxide molecules in the atmosphere creating carbonic acid in the raindrops, thus lowering the rain's pH value (note: a pH level of 5.6, though acidic, is not considered acid rain which is below pH 5.0). Carbon dioxide concentrations can also affect pH; although carbon dioxide exists in water in a dissolved state (like oxygen), it can also react with water to form carbonic acid and reduce pH. Pine or fir needles can also decrease the pH of soil, and any water that runs over it, as they decompose. A pH range between 6.0 and 9.0 is suitable for many fish, though salmon do best in waters with pH levels between 6.5 and 8.5. Conductivity, Total Dissolved Solids, Salinity Monitoring conductivity, total dissolved solids, and salinity provides insights into the amounts of inorganic and organic substances in water. Conductivity is a measure of water's ability to pass an electrical current. This ability is directly related to the concentration of ions in the water. These conductive ions come from dissolved salts and inorganic materials such as alkalis, chlorides, sulfides and carbonate compounds. The more ions that are present, the higher the conductivity of water. Likewise, the fewer ions that are in the water, the less conductive it is. Distilled or deionized water has a very low (if not negligible) conductivity value. Sea water, on the other hand, has very high conductivity. Total dissolved solids (TDS) is similar to conductivity measurements but it is the total amount of all inorganic and organic substances smaller than two micrometers (i.e., dissolved) in water including minerals, salts, metals, cations or anions. TDS concentrations are equal to the sum of positively charged ions (cations) and negatively charged ions (anions) in the water. Sources for TDS include agricultural run-off, urban run-off, industrial wastewater, sewage, and natural sources such as leaves, silt, plankton, and rocks. 12 Packet Pg. 90 6.1.a Salinity is a measure of the amount of salts in the water. Because dissolved sodium ions increase salinity as well as conductivity, the two measures are related. The salts in sea water are primarily sodium chloride, but can include smaller amounts of magnesium sulfate, potassium nitrate, and sodium bicarbonate which all dissolve into ions. Seawater typically has a salinity of about 35 parts per thousand (ppt) although lower values are typical near shore especially where rivers enter the ocean. Conductivity and TDS are affected by the presence of inorganic compounds which are influenced by the geology and size of the area through which water flows. As rock and soil erode, minerals dissolve and they increase TDS, thus also increasing conductivity. Human impacts can influence conductivity and TDS through industrial and wastewater discharges, road runoff (particularly melting salts) and agricultural runoff. Rain is normally low in conductivity and can lower the conductivity of a water body during heavy rainfall. Significant changes in conductivity can indicate a discharge or some other form of pollution that can affect salmon and other aquatic organisms. Nutrients Nutrients are elements required for the growth of organisms. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon are the three most important nutrients for aquatic plants. For this study, only nitrates (a form of nitrogen combined with oxygen) were monitored because that is the only nutrient that the electronic meter available to the project could measure. Although nitrogen compounds are essential for plant and animal life, high levels can cause detrimental effects. High levels of nutrients in a body of water may cause plant life and algae to flourish causing blooms that can choke out other organisms. These large plant populations caused by excess nutrients may eventually deplete available dissolved oxygen (a process called eutrophication). These excess nutrients may come from runoff from fertilized farmlands and lawns, sewage, detergents, animal wastes, and leaking septic systems. Nitrates and ammonia are the most common forms of nitrogen and the most useable by aquatic plants, but significant amounts of nitrogen can be present in other forms. Concentrations of nitrates are usually expressed as nitrate -nitrogen (NO3-N) and not as nitrate (NO3). A nitrate -nitrogen measurement in water of less than 1.0 mg/L is considered to be excellent; between 1.1-3 mg/L is considered to be good; between 3.1-5 mg/L is fair; and greater than 5 mg/L is considered to be poor. Dissolved Metals and Petroleum Compounds Dissolved metals and petroleum -derived compounds are some of the more common contaminants in water that can be toxic or adversely affect aquatic organisms at higher levels, although some may be toxic at low levels or long exposure. Many of the metals are naturally occurring in the terrestrial and aquatic environments in trace amounts and only become of concern at higher 13 Packet Pg. 91 6.1.a levels. Petroleum -derived compound enter the air, water and soil from numerable sources. Unfortunately, lab costs to detect metals or petroleum -derived products are expensive. Heavy metals such as zinc, iron, and copper are naturally occurring substances in the Earth's crust. Some metals are needed by humans in trace amounts to maintain optimum body function, while others such as mercury, arsenic, and cadmium can be harmful. All metals can be toxic if levels are too high. Exposure to high levels of zinc for example over long periods of time may cause adverse health effects in humans. Most metals stay bound to the solid particles in the ground, but can become suspended or dissolve in water dependent on a number of conditions such as water hardness and pH levels. Dissolved metals occur in different forms and some may be more toxic than others. The different metals also have varying degrees of natural occurrence. Iron for example, has high abundance within the earth's crust, and it commonly occurs in all freshwater environments and often reaches significantly higher concentrations in water and sediments than other trace metals (Vuori 1995). Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) is a term used to describe a broad family of several hundred chemical compounds that originally come from crude oil. In this sense, TPH is really a mixture of chemicals. They are called hydrocarbons because almost all of them are made entirely from hydrogen and carbon. Crude oils can vary in how much of each chemical they contain, and so can the petroleum products that are made from crude oils. Because modern society uses so many petroleum -based products (for example, gasoline, kerosene, fuel oil, mineral oil, and asphalt), contamination of the environment by them is potentially widespread. Contamination caused by petroleum products will contain a variety of these hydrocarbons. Because there are so many, it is not usually practical to measure each one individually. Therefore, it is useful to measure the total amount of all hydrocarbons found together in a particular sample (i.e., total petroleum hydrocarbons). TPD is measured in three ranges — gasoline, diesel and oil — but the tests are not specifically for gasoline, diesel fuel, or oil, but rather are tests for petroleum hydrocarbons that are in the "range" of those found in gasoline, diesel fuel or oil. The effects of exposure to TPH depend on many factors including the types of chemical compounds in the TPH, how long the exposure lasts, and the amount of the chemicals contacted. Very little is known about the toxicity of many TPH compounds (Todd et al. 1999). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) originate from petroleum and combustion products. The major sources of PAR in the environment are municipalities and industries that generate large quantities of PAHs, such as aluminum smelting, creosote, and oil refining. Atmospheric emissions from incineration and automobile emissions are other major sources of PAHs. PAHs are also introduced into marine systems through accidental spills of fuel oil, crude oil, and other petroleum products. PAHs are very toxic to invertebrates and fish and their occurrence has only increased in the aquatic environment over time (Johnson et al. 2008). 14 Packet Pg. 92 6.1.a Fecal Coliform Bacteria Bacterial monitoring is another method of assessing water quality using indicator bacteria such as fecal coliform to determine the potential presence of pathogens that may be harmful to humans. Fecal coliform are a sub -group of coliform bacteria that are commonly found in the environment (e.g., in soil or vegetation). Fecal coliform live in the digestive tracks of warm-blooded animals (humans, dogs, cats, birds, other mammals, etc.), and are excreted in the feces. Although most fecal coliform bacteria are not harmful, some are pathogenic. The presence of fecal coliform in aquatic environments may indicate that the water has been contaminated with the fecal material through direct discharge from mammals and birds, from agricultural and storm runoff, and from human sewage. High levels of fecal coliform bacteria is an indicator that other pathogens may also be present. Recent advances in the use of indicator bacteria have shown that Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Enterococci (in saltwater) bacteria (which are sub -groups of the fecal coliform bacteria) are more reliable for predicting the presence of disease -causing organisms and are now recommended for use in bacterial monitoring programs by the EPA. Macroinvertebrates Stream biomonitoring is another method of assessing water quality using the presence of benthic (bottom dwelling) macroinvertebrates as an indicator of the potential level of pollutants in a stream. Benthic macroinvertebrates are aquatic insect larvae, crustaceans (amphipods, isopods) and mollusks (snails) that are visible to the naked eye. Some benthic macroinvertebrates cannot survive in polluted water while others can survive or even thrive in polluted water. Thus, the occurrence of different species/genera of macroinvertebrates (each have differing pollutant tolerance) in a water sample can be used as a relative indicator of water quality. Further, since benthic macroinvertebrates spend most of their aquatic occurrence in the same general stream location, they may better reflect longer term stream conditions than water sampling measurements which only reflect the condition of the stream at the moment that the sample was taken. METHODS This citizen science project was designed for high school student involvement. Students were trained in field data collection protocols including use and maintenance of electronic instruments, field data collection protocols, and database management. Monitoring Locations and Schedule Monitoring sites were selected to provide representative locations for upper and lower reaches of Shellabarger, Willow and Shell Creeks and various locations including incoming/outgoing flow sites in the Edmonds Marsh. Selection criteria included easy and safe access to creek sites and property owner permission. Shellabarger Creek has three geographically separated forks in the upper creek area and only the middle and southern forks could be monitored. Shellabarger Creek 15 Packet Pg. 93 6.1.a monitoring included the Shellabarger Marsh where it flows under Highway 104 into the Edmonds Marsh. The Marsh was a challenge to establish sites since only the edges of the Marsh were easily accessible and the western and southern edges were not accessible (Burlington Northern Railroad property and old UnoCal site). Fortunately, the City allowed access to the fenced Marsh outlet basin (west of railroad tracks) in the Marina parking lot which was an ideal location to sample outgoing water from the main body of the Marsh. A map showing the location of each monitoring site is provided in Appendix B. A sampling plan was developed that called for monitoring designated sites at least once -a -month. The Students Saving Salmon club formed four teams of two to four students with each team responsible for monitoring four sites each in Willow Creek, Shell Creek, Shellabarger Creek, and Edmonds Marsh respectively on one day each month. This ensured that the upper and lower portion of each creek and the incoming/outgoing sites at the Marsh were monitored on the same day. Each team selected a date, based on team member availability, for monitoring so that all 16 sites were monitored in the first two weeks of each month. Monitoring occurred in the afternoon (after school) regardless of weather except for two days when monitoring occurred on Saturday morning due to conflicting student weekday activities. Monitoring Equipment A rugged, high quality handheld multiparameter instrument, a YSI Professional Plus (YSI ProPlus), was used by students to collect water quality data. The YSI ProPlus is equipped with a 4 meter (12 foot) cable (to allow monitoring off low bridges) with an attached Quatro probe that holds four user replaceable sensors for temperature/conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH and nitrate measurements. The instrument was calibrated by the project leader each month just prior to that month's monitoring. Water Quality Parameters Monitored There are many parameters that can be monitored to assess a stream's condition or trends in water quality. The Edmonds Stream Team chose to emulate the Washington State Department of Ecology's ambient water quality monitoring program (Von Prause 2014) which collects monthly data in rivers and streams throughout Washington. We were however limited on available equipment and laboratory access to collect all of the State's standard parameters monthly. We did collect dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, conductivity, and nitrates each month, but did not have the additional capacity to collect ammonia, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, turbidity, fecal coliform and total suspended solids data as the State does at all stations each month. The specifics of each parameter collected by the Edmonds Stream Team is as follows. Water temperature was recorded to the nearest tenth degree (0.1) Fahrenheit (°F) and also reported (converted) in Celsius (°C) in the database. Measured temperatures were evaluated against Washington's Water Quality Standards (WAC 173 -20 1 A-2 10) which sets aquatic life 16 Packet Pg. 94 6.1.a standards (7 day average of daily maximum temperatures) at 63.5 °F (17.5 ° C) for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration and at 60.8 ° F (16.0 ° C) for core summer salmonid habitat. pH was reported to the nearest hundredth (0.01) on pH scale of 0 to 14. Measured pH values were evaluated against Washington's Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-210) which sets all aquatic life pH criteria to be within a range of 6.5 to 8.5. Dissolved oxygen levels were recorded to the nearest tenth (0.1) mg/L of oxygen at each monitored site. Measured dissolved oxygen levels (mg/L) were evaluated against Washington's Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-210) which sets a lowest 1-day minimum at 8.0 mg/L for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration; and, 6.5 mg/L for salmon rearing and migration only. Conductivity was recorded to the nearest tenth microSiemens per centimeter (µS/cm). Total dissolved solids (TDS) were recorded in grams per liter (g/L). Salinity was recorded in parts per thousand (ppt). There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for these parameters. Conductivity measurements were also reported as `specific conductance' which is the conductivity measurement corrected to 25 °C (77 °F). Since water temperature affects conductivity measurements, reporting conductivity at a standardized temperature (25 ° C / 77 °F) allows the data to be easily compared and provides a standardized method of reporting conductivity. To monitor nutrients, a nitrate sensor on the YSI ProPlus instrument was used. Phosphorus was not monitored. Nitrate concentration expressed as nitrate -nitrogen (NO3-N) was recorded in mg/L. The nitrate sensor began failing during the April monitoring period so the data in this report for nitrates is limited to the October to March timeframe. Data Collection, Management and Quality Control In addition to water parameter measurements, basic data (e.g., depth/width of stream, vegetation, bottom substrate, air temperature, water flow, water clarity, past precipitation, etc.) were recorded on the `Water Quality Data Sheet' (see Appendix 3) for each site monitored. The water quality data were later entered into a `Edmonds Water Quality Database' spreadsheet that is maintained in Google Drive (so it is easily accessible online for student data entry as well as public access). Quality control and assurance measures involved adherence to monitoring protocols, data review, routine instrument calibration, replicate measurements, and separate measurements by the project leader to validate results. The Project Leader accompanied students on all collections to ensure adherence to monitoring protocols. Water quality measurements for all sites (including replicates) were reviewed each month to ensure any data abnormalities were evaluated and replicate measurements taken as necessary. Data rows in the database were protected (so they could not be altered except by the database manager) after data entry had been reviewed. 17 Packet Pg. 95 6.1.a Backups of the database were made routinely. Questionable or potentially erroneous data were flagged in the database. Lab analysis for dissolved metals and petroleum compounds The sampling plan called for water samples to be collected and delivered to an accredited water analysis laboratory for petroleum -derived compounds and dissolved metals testing four times per year (once each season - winter, spring, summer, fall) and during storm events in spring and/or fall at the lower creek sites and the Marsh. Stormwater samples were to be `first flush' samples collected during a rainstorm with a forecast of 0.25 inches or greater after three days of no rain. The number of sites, frequency of collection and number of pollutants analyzed was restricted due to costs of laboratory analysis and availability of grant funds to conduct the laboratory analyses. Samples were collected in sterile bottles provided by the Lab. Although three seasonal samples were collected, the stormwater samples unfortunately were not collected primarily due to inadequate dry spells before heavy rains occurred and logistical limitations due to a 24 hour sample delivery time to the lab which was closed on weekends. Thirteen water samples collected in sterile bottles provided by the Lab in the fall (October 2015), winter (January 2016) and spring (April 2016) from lower Shell, Shellabarger and Willow Creeks and the Edmonds Marsh were delivered to the ALS Environmental Laboratory in Everett for analysis. The samples were analyzed for arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), cooper (Cu), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and zinc (Zn) and levels detected were reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L). The fall samples did not include Pb and Hg analysis, and only the spring samples included Fe analysis. All samples were analyzed for BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) and TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbons). A limited number of samples were analyzed for PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) due to the high cost of the analysis. The Edmonds Marsh outlet was the only site sampled for PAH in all three seasons. Lab analysis for fecal coliform bacteria Students collected periodic water samples that were analyzed for fecal coliform (E. coli) at the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant, and for coliform bacteria and E. coli at North Seattle Community College. The North Seattle Community College (NSCC) microbiology lab analyzed water samples from eight monitoring sites in their November 16, 2015 class and fifteen sites in their February 16, 2016 class. The water samples were analyzed during laboratory exercises for coliform bacteria using the `multiple tube fermentation' process. Three EWHS participated in the coliform bacteria sessions at both classes. One of the EWHS students (Rondi Nordal) independently conducted follow-up analyses at both NSCC classes to confirm the presence of E. coli in the Edmonds Marsh outlet samples. The process involved a series of tests starting with the multiple tube fermentation technique, in which 18 Packet Pg. 96 6.1.a a growth solution (also called a broth) is used to grow bacteria from the water sample. As each test is conducted, more information is gathered about the type of bacteria or mixture of bacteria that is in the water. The first step is to determine if any bacteria are present using a growth medium. If there is any substantial growth, based on the lab protocol, a sample of the broth is then transferred to another medium (with a different solution) to further identify it. This process continues until a point where the species can be determined according to a list of characteristics typical of lab specimens (the limitation of this is that `wild' strains may not adhere to the typical characteristics of a lab sample and may make it more difficult to determine the species). Nonetheless, it was concluded in both labs that E. coli was present in the Edmonds Marsh outlet sample. In January 2016, the City of Edmonds agreed to analyze water samples for fecal coliform several times a year. Eleven students were trained on water sampling for fecal coliform and attended a demonstration on the lab processes for detection of fecal coliform. Water samples were then collected by students in sterile Whirl -Pack bags from fourteen monitoring sites in February 2016 (winter sample) and eleven monitoring sites in April 2016 (spring sample). Each water sample was stored on ice during field collection and delivered to the Lab within 2 hours of collection. The spring samples included replicate samples from two sites collected on adjacent days before/during/after rain events. The Lab processed each sample using the Membrane Filter Procedure (mFC/Rosalic Acid Broth). There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for fecal coliform for freshwater aquatic life. However, there are criteria in the Washington Administrative Code (173-201A-260) for water contact recreation which sets a `primary contact recreation' criteria that fecal coliform organism levels must not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 mL, with not more than 10 percent of all samples (or any single sample when less than ten sample points exist) obtained for calculating the geometric mean value exceeding 200 colonies /100 mL. A `secondary contact recreation' criteria is the same except the 100 colonies value is set at 200 colonies and the not more than ten percent for the 200 colonies value is set at 400 colonies. Collecting and identifying macroinvertebrates Sound Salmon Solutions conducted macroinvertebrate identification training with EWHS IB Science classes. Macroinvertebrate water samples were collected by students using D shaped kick nets at the upper Shell Creek monitoring site in Yost Park on May 2nd and 3rd. The water samples were examined in the IB classes on May 4th and 5th. The macroinvertebrates identified were classified into three groups based on their pollution tolerance. Group 1 macroinvertebrates, consisting of caddisfly larvae, mayfly nymphs, stonefly nymphs are intolerant of pollution; Group 2 macroinvertebrates, consisting of scud, cranefly larvae, are partially tolerant of pollution; and, Group 3 macroinvertebrates, consisting of aquatic worm, blackfly larvae, midge larvae are tolerant of pollution. 19 Packet Pg. 97 6.1.a RESULTS This preliminary report provides results for the first eight months (October through May) of this project on monthly water quality trends, bacteria (fecal coliform) monitoring in February and April, biomonitoring (macroinvertebrate sampling) in May, and seasonal lab results on dissolved metal and petroleum -derived compounds. Water quality trends The water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH trends observed were as expected with water temperatures changing with season and dissolved oxygen levels fluctuating with water temperature (i.e., higher dissolved oxygen levels with colder waters). The specific results for each parameter are below. Water Temperature Water Temperature - All Creeks 60 e 50 40 30 20 10 0 October November December January February March April May 2015 2016 --*--Shell Creek - Lower tShell Creek - Middle Shell Creek - Upper —s --Shellabarger Creek - Lower —4--Shellabarger Creek - Upper middle forktShellabarger Creek - Upper south fork t Willow Creek - Lower Willow Creek - Upper Water temperature in the three creeks exhibited the expected trend of decreasing temperatures in the fall (average 51.0°F from October to early December) with winter lows (average 49.1 °F for January to early March) and increases into spring (average 53.8 °F from April to May). The overall average temperature in all creeks (for all eight months) was 51.6°F ranging from a high of 56.8°F in May in lower Shellabarger Creek to a low of 45.6°F in January in lower Willow Creek. The Marsh temperatures are presented separately below in the Marsh results. Note that the eight months monitored to date do not include the summer months of potentially higher water temperatures. 20 Packet Pg. 98 6.1.a All of the observed water temperatures in the three creeks from October 2015 to May 2016 were below the 60.8°F threshold for `core summer salmonid habitat' set forth in the Washington Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-210). Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) - All Creeks 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 October November December January February March April May 2015 2016 Shell Creek - Lower Shell Creek - Upper (Shell Creek - Middle —0—Shellabarger Creek - Lower Shellabarger Creek - Upper middle forks Shellabarger Creek - Upper south fork Willow Creek - Lower Willow Creek - Upper Dissolved oxygen in the three Creeks generally had an opposite trend of water temperature. Since colder water holds more dissolved oxygen than warmer water, the trend observed was increasing dissolved oxygen in the fall (average 10.8 mg/L from October to early December) with winter highs (average 11.1 mg/L from January to early March) and decreasing into spring (average 10.3 mg/L from April to May). The overall average dissolved oxygen level in all creeks (for all eight months) was 10.5 mg/L ranging from a high of 12.5 mg/L in February in middle Shell Creek to a low of 9.3 mg/L in October in the upper south fork of Shellabarger Creek. The Marsh dissolved oxygen levels varied by site and are presented separately below in the Marsh results. All of the observed dissolved oxygen levels in the three creeks from October 2015 to May 2016 were above the 1-day minimum of 8.0 mg/L for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration set forth in the Washington Water Quality Standards (WAC 173-201A-210). However, growing salmon eggs in stream gravel do best in dissolved oxygen levels of 11 mg/L. Since salmon currently are known to only spawn in one of the three creeks studied (Shell Creek), the desired 11 mg/L dissolved oxygen level is assessed below in the Shell Creek results. 21 Packet Pg. 99 6.1.a PH pH - All Creeks 9 IF g o r 7 6 c y 5 4 a c 3 G E 2 M 1 co M 0 S October November December January February March April May N 2015 2016 N m tShell Creek - Lower Shell Creek - Middle 3 co (Shell Creek - Upper Shellabarger Creek - Lower u� -I-Shellabarger Creek - Upper middle fork Shellabarger Creek - Upper south fork N T +Willow Creek - Lower Willow Creek - Upper I t! The pH in all three Creeks generally stayed constant in each creek averaging pH 7.71 (for all eight months) except for a decline down to an average pH 7.26 that occurred in December during a period of rainstorms and a smaller decline down to an average pH 7.52 in March again during a period of greater rain. Rain is more acidic than stream water and heavy rains likely caused the reduced pH levels. The average pH was highest in middle Shell Creek with a pH 7.94 and lowest in upper Willow Creek with a pH 7.46. The highest pH measured in a creek was pH 8.22 in middle Shell Creek in October. The lowest pH measured in a creek was pH 6.97 in upper south fork of Shellabarger Creek in December. The Marsh pH measurements varied by site and are presented separately below in the Marsh results. All of the observed pH levels in the Creeks were within the pH 6.5 to 8.5 range that is suitable for salmon and within the Washington Water Quality Standards for aquatic life. Conductivity Conductivity measurements in all three creeks averaged 246.2 µS/cm ranging from an average high of 308.4 µS/cm in upper Shell Creek in February and a low of 81.1 µS/cm in upper Shell Creek in December. Conductivity readings in the creeks averaged between 243 and 285 µS/cm in all months except for December and March when they dropped down to an average 135.6 µS/cm in December and 205.8 µS/cm in March. Both December and March were periods of high rainfall which would be expected to lower creek conductivity measurements since rainwater is generally 22 Packet Pg. 100 6.1.a low in ions (thus low in conductivity). The conductivity measurements in the Marsh were affected by the tidegate with high conductivity levels recorded during saltwater intrusion. In October, while the tidegate was still secured open, the conductivity measured at the Marsh outlet basin was 11,439.5 µS/cm. Such high conductivity readings in the Marsh are not unexpected since saltwater has much more dissolved ions and solids than freshwater. Nitrates Nitrate levels in all three creeks were low averaging 1.3 mg/L for six months (October to March). Since the nitrate sensor began to fail in April, the nitrate data collected in April and May are considered invalid. The average nitrate level was highest in the upper middle fork of Shellabarger Creek with 1.6 mg/L nitrates and lowest in lower Shell Creek with 1.2 mg/L nitrates. The highest nitrates level measured in a creek was 2.3 mg/L in upper Shell Creek in February (which was also the month with highest average nitrate levels at 2.0 mg/L). The lowest nitrates level measured in a creek was also in upper Shell Creek with 0.3 mg/L measured in December. The Edmonds Marsh also had very low nitrate levels averaging 1.7 mg/L nitrates at all sites. The highest nitrate measurement of 6.2 mg/L in the Edmonds Marsh was at the Marsh outlet basin in October when the tide gate was open allowing saltwater to enter the Marsh. These low levels of nitrates do not rise to a level of concern for excess nutrients in any of the streams or Marsh during the October to May timeframe. 23 Packet Pg. 101 6.1.a Edmonds Marsh 12 Edmonds Marsh - Dissolved Oxygen Edmonds Marsh - East edge at storm drain Edmonds Marsh - Eastern edge Edmonds Marsh - Eastern edge at Hwy 104 Culvert Edmonds Marsh - Harbor Square east culvert Edmonds Marsh - Harbor Square west culvert Edmonds Marsh - Marsh outlet Edmonds Marsh - Dissolved Oxygen. The main flow through the Edmonds Marsh (from Shellabarger inlet at the Hwy 104 culverts to the Marsh outlet) had dissolved oxygen averaging 9.4 mg/L that exceeded minimal requirements for all months with a high of 11.3 mg/L in April and low of 7.9 mg/L in October. However, dissolved oxygen measured on the northern edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square was too low (averaging 1.8 mg/L) for salmon survival in all months except March when it increased to 7.1 mg/L. The northern edge of the Marsh had standing water with decaying matter substrate in most months with apparently little to no water circulation with the water in the main body of the Marsh. The eastern edge of the Marsh also had standing water, but appeared to have some circulation with the Shellabarger inflow resulting in dissolved oxygen levels averaging 8.7 mg/L from January to April, but only averaging 5.5 mg/L in November, December and May. Another eastern edge Marsh site opposite a Highway 104 drain was only monitored in April and May and had dissolved oxygen levels of 1.3 and 0.9 mg/L, which are well below salmon requirements. Resident cutthroat trout and any salmon present in the Marsh would likely avoid the edges of the Marsh due to the low dissolved oxygen levels. 24 Packet Pg. 102 6.1.a Edmonds Marsh - Water Temperature. Water temperature at all sites in the Marsh exhibited the expected trend of decreasing temperatures in the fall (average 54.2 °F from October to early December) with winter lows (average 47.6°F for January to early March) and increases into spring (average 58.5 °F from April to May). The lowest temperature recorded was 44.2 °F in January on the north edge of the Marsh at Harbor Square and the highest temperature was 68.5 °F in May at the Marsh outlet. The 68.5 °F reading on May 1 Oth, which was confirmed with a replicate sample, is very different from the May water temperatures of the Shellabarger inlet which was 57.7°F and the lower Willow Creek incoming flow which was 56.1 OF. The high reading may be an artifact of the spring/summer monitoring protocol for the Marsh outlet which calls for monitoring during low tide to avoid sampling incoming saltwater from Puget Sound. The May temperature reading was taken when the Marsh was at its lowest level and thus likely influenced by ambient air and soil temperatures. Besides this one higher temperature, there were only two other temperature recordings (61.9°F in May and 61.0°F in October on north edge of Marsh) that exceeded the 60.8 °F core summer salmonid habitat criteria in Washington's Water Quality Standards. These data do not include summer measurements which will need to be evaluated against the standards. Edmonds marsh — pH. The edges of the Edmonds Marsh along Harbor Square were more acidic (average pH 6.61) than the main flow through the Marsh from the Shellabarger inlet at the Hwy 104 culverts to the Marsh outlet (average pH 7.31) in all months. One site along Harbor Square in January had a measured pH of 6.47 and that was the only Marsh site that wasn't within the Washington Water Quality Standard of between pH 6.5 and pH 8.5 for salmon. 12 10 4 N Edmonds Marsh - Salinity tEdmonds Marsh - Eastern edge at Hwy 104 Culvert f Edmonds Marsh - Marsh outlet Edmonds Marsh — Salinity. The salinity of the water in the Marsh is affected by a tidegate located downstream of the Marsh outlet. The tidegate functions to prevent saltwater intrusion into 25 Packet Pg. 103 6.1.a the Marsh from mid -October to mid -March (to prevent flooding during periods of coinciding high rainfall and high tides). In mid -March, the tidegate is secured in an open position to allow full tidal exchange of saltwater through the spring/summer months. The salinity measurements at the Marsh outlet (which is representative of the main body of the Marsh) from December to early March (averaging 0.14 ppt) reflect the low salinity of the incoming freshwater from the Shellabarger inlet and lower Willow Creek (both having average salinity of 0.11 ppt for all months). But, when the tide gate is secured open, the salinity measurements were significantly greater in the Marsh with 9.76 ppt salinity in October, 6.8 ppt in April and 3.2 ppt in May. The Marsh outlet salinity measurements during months when the tide gate is secured open are affected by when in the tidal cycle the measurements are taken. The spring/summer monitoring protocol for the Marsh outlet calls for monitoring during low tide to avoid sampling incoming saltwater from Puget Sound, and thus results in lower salinity readings (due to mixing with freshwater) than would be observed during incoming tidal saltwater (since saltwater has a salinity of about 35 ppt). The November salinity measurement at the Marsh outlet (after the tide gate was `closed' on October 27th ) was 0.42 ppt salinity, and the higher level may reflect residual salinity in the Marsh sediments. The northern edge of the Marsh (along Harbor Square) had an average salinity of 0.30 ppt over all months with declines in salinity in December to 0.14 ppt and March to 0.05 ppt salinity during periods of higher rainfall which likely diluted the water. The influx of tidal water when the tidegate was secured open did not alter the average salinity readings along the northern edge of the Marsh indicating the tide waters do not reach this area. The Edmonds Marsh would likely be a better environment for aquatic organisms if the tidegate was secured open year- round because the saltwater/freshwater interface in a marsh is known to be one of the most productive environments for aquatic organisms. 26 Packet Pg. 104 6.1.a Shell Creek . &A,ftdotm!gt acXY.e i 341 ;im EM CIO trst!a SSrrgA + �*-Wrff?M--r.T. r+olk,tion irf olerant maono- 6 4 O .4fi s: �bnlYr Cca�r 'b'rnt+s ]mcn�r sa it to ry 's�rti ay 15r� .\F� Yry ID6 Shell Creek dissolved oxygen (DO) levels are more critical in Shell Creek than the other two creeks because chum salmon spawn in the lower reach of the Shell Creek and salmon eggs are in the gravel in the winter. Salmon eggs require higher dissolved oxygen levels to grow and hatch, and the DO levels for each month that eggs may be in the gravel were evaluated. The dissolved oxygen levels measured in lower Shell Creek were 11.0 mg/L in November, 11.4 mg/L in December, 11.2 mg/L in January and 12.1 mg/L in February. Thus, the measured dissolved oxygen levels in lower Shell Creek were within the optimum levels necessary for chum salmon eggs. Overall, the lower Shell Creek averaged 11.0 mg/L for all months (October to May) while upper Shell Creek averaged 9.6 mg/L DO over all months. The lower DO levels at the upper end of Shell Creek probably reflects groundwater (which has lower DO) entering the creek. The average level of dissolved oxygen of 10.4 mg/L throughout the creek (upper, middle and lower) in all months monitored exceeds the requirements in the Washington Water Quality Standards. Shell Creek — Water Temperature. Shell Creek water temperatures did not fluctuate much from the upper to lower reaches of the creek averaging only a 0.5 degree difference. The greatest difference was 2.5 degrees in May. Shell Creek followed the expected trend of decreasing water temperature into the winter (from average 50.2°F in fall to 48.4°F) and then increasing into spring (average 52.9°F). Temperatures were compared to chum salmon life history requirements, and found to be within acceptable limits. 27 Packet Pg. 105 6.1.a Willow Creek and Shellabarger Creek The general water quality conditions of both creeks are presented above in the overview of all three creeks. Since both Willow and Shellabarger Creeks flow into the Edmonds Marsh, their respective conditions and relative contribution to the water quality of the Marsh were compared. The average pH of Willow Creek was more acidic than Shellabarger Creek (pH 7.56 vs 7.72) while the `body' of the Marsh (as measured at the Marsh outlet basin and the Shellabarger Marsh inlet) was closer to neutral with an average pH of 7.4. In both Willow and Shellabarger Creeks, the pH tended to increase slightly from the upper reaches to the lower creek. The average dissolved oxygen level for all months was the same for both creeks (10.5 mg/L) while the Marsh outlet had a lower average of 9.5 mg/L. Shellabarger Creek flows into the Shellabarger Marsh before its water enters the Marsh, and the Shellabarger Marsh had a lower average dissolved oxygen level than the creek (DO of 9.1 mg/L vs 10.3 mg/L at lower creek). The upper middle fork of Shellabarger was unique in that its average dissolved oxygen level of 11.1 mg/L was higher than DO at the lower end of the creek (10.3 mg/L). In all other creeks/forks of creeks, the upper reaches usually have a lower DO levels than the lower reaches of the creek. The average water temperature over all months was slightly lower in Shellabarger Creek (51.9 °F) than Willow Creek (52.4°F) and the Marsh outlet averaged a bit higher than both creeks (55.8°F). Fecal Coliform Bacteria Fecal Coliform (colonies/100 ml) 300 250 200 150 100 0 50 T-- Tl- 1 Upper Upper Lower NW SW Eastern Marsh middle south Corner Corner edge at outlet south fork Hwy 104 Culvert Shellabarger Creek Shellabarger Edmonds Marsh Marsh • � I Upper Lower Upper Lower Lower Willow Creek Shell Creek Hindley Creek ■ 2/3/2016 2/8/2016 2/9/2016 a 2/10/2016 4/11/2016 4/12/2016 4/13/2016 28 Packet Pg. 106 6.1.a Counts of fecal coliform bacteria colonies cultured from water samples collected in February and April showed some sites had much higher levels of fecal coliform bacteria than others. The lower Shellabarger Creek, the Shellabarger Marsh, the Shellabarger inlet to the Edmonds Marsh, and the Edmonds Marsh outlet sites all had counts of fecal coliform bacteria exceeding 100 colonies/100 mL in one or both months sampled. In contrast, the upper and lower Willow and Shell Creek sites had an average fecal coliform count of 29 colonies in Shell Creek and 10 colonies in Willow Creek. Sites along the north periphery of the Marsh (along Harbor Square) also had very low bacteria counts (less than 10 colonies). There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for fecal coliform for freshwater aquatic life. However, if we use the Washington criteria for water contact recreation (i.e., levels must not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 mL) as an indicator of a potential bacteria problem, then the elevated Shellabarger bacteria counts in contrast to the other creeks may be a concern. The upper Shellabarger Creek was sampled on February 10th and had 17 colonies in the upper middle fork and 20 colonies in the upper south fork while the lower Shellabarger Creek sample had I I I colonies counted on the same day. This suggests the source of the elevated fecal coliform levels are downstream of the upper Shellabarger Creek areas. Since the waters downstream of lower Shellabarger Creek (i.e., the Marsh inlet and outlet) also had elevated fecal coliform counts, it suggests Shellabarger Creek is the source of fecal coliform bacteria in the Marsh. This is further evidenced by the February 3rd sample collected at the Shellabarger inlet to the Marsh having 288 colonies while the Marsh outlet sample (which was collected within an hour of the inlet sample) had 175 colonies likely indicating dilution with the lower fecal bacteria waters from Willow Creek. In April, consecutive day water samples were collected over three days at the Shellabarger inlet to the Marsh. The first sample was taken on April 11, which was a dry day with the last rainfall six days prior. The second sample was taken on April 12 during a rain event that had accumulated about 0.05 inches of rain up to the time of sampling (rain amounts were obtained from the Weather Underground website). The third sample was taken on April 13th which was a dry day that followed a total accumulation of 0.09 inches of rain on the previous day. The fecal coliform counts for the samples were 4 colonies on April 1 lth, 178 colonies on April 12th, and 60 colonies on April 131h. These data show the influence of rainfall on the fecal coliform counts and suggest the need for further consecutive day sampling at each of the sites to better understand the source of the elevated fecal coliform counts. 29 Packet Pg. 107 6.1.a Dissolved Metals and Petroleum Compounds DISSOLVED METALS (ug/L) FALL 2015 WINTER s r � N p o t L L L G G � � o 2 SPRING 2016 ■ Average of Arsenic ■ Average of Cadmium ■ Average of Chromium ■ Average of Copper ■ Average of Lead ■ Average of Zinc ■ Average of Iron All sites had very low levels of the dissolved metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) that were tested for. Mercury was not detected at any of the sites. As shown in the graph, iron (which was analyzed only in the winter samples) and zinc had higher levels detected than the other metals which were essentially at trace amounts. However, both iron and zinc levels detected were well below the Washington Water Quality Standards of 124 µg/L for zinc and 1000 µg/L. The highest zinc level detected was 54 µg/L in the April sample from lower Willow Creek. The highest iron level detected was 340 µg/L also in the April sample from lower Willow Creek. These and additional dissolved metal data collections planned will be reviewed further along with any standards during preparation of an annual report. Data collected to date will serve as baseline seasonal data on dissolved metals in Edmonds streams as they were collected on a seasonal basis and not targeted on storm events. Water samples collected in the future during storm events can then be compared to these baseline data to assess stormwater contribution to dissolved metals in the creeks and Marsh. 30 Packet Pg. 108 6.1.a Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L) 400 300 200 100 0 L .N dA O N C L L N _ N on Y N 0 n ra O t � L � 0 O Q) 0 FALL WINTER 2015 SPRING 2016 Average of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon — Diesel Average of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon — Oil Average of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon — Volatile Range Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were detected at all sites sampled in all three seasons (fall, winter and spring). Sites sampled in all three seasons had each of the three ranges of petroleum hydrocarbons - diesel, oil, and volatile range - detected in at least one of the season samples except the lower Willow Creek site which had no volatile range TPH detected in any sample. The Marsh outlet site only had oil range TPH detected in the spring season. The east edge of the Marsh (along Highway 104) was sampled only in the spring season and had oil and diesel range TPH detected, but not volatile range TPH. Higher levels of diesel and oil range TPH were observed in the spring in lower Willow and lower Shellabarger Creeks. These TPH data and any standards that apply will be reviewed further during the preparation of an annual report. The data collected to date will serve as baseline seasonal data for Edmonds streams since they were collected on a seasonal basis and not targeted on storm events. Future samples taken during storm events can be compared to these baseline data to assess stormwater contribution to TPH in the creeks and Marsh. 31 Packet Pg. 109 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAH) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons lower Willow 10/21/15 Marsh outlet 10/25/15 Marsh outlet 1116/16 Marsh outlet 4/12/16 Marsh east edge 4/13/16 1-Methyl naphthalene (Ng/L) ND ND 0.0027 0.0015 0.0012 2-Methylnaphthalene (pg/L) ND ND 0.0027 ND ND Acenaphthene (pg/L) ND ND 0.0039 0.0049 ND Acenaphthylene (Ng/L) ND ND ND ND ND Anthracene (Ng/L) ND ND 0.0063 ND 0.0038 Benzo[A]Anthracene (pg/L) 0.0078 ND 0.0057 0.0071 0.0064 Benzo(A)Pyrene (pg/L) ND ND 0.0072 0.014 0.012 Benzo(B)Fluoranthene (Ng/L) ND ND ND 0.013 0.0099 Benzo(G,H,I)Perylene (Ng/L) ND ND ND ND ND Benzo(K)Fluoranthene (Ng/L) ND ND ND 0.015 0.012 Chrysene (pg/L) 0.0075 ND ND 0.0021 0.0060 Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene (Ng/L) ND ND ND ND 0.0057 Fluoranthene (pg/L) 0.0041 0.011 0.0041 0.0034 0.0025 Fluorene (Ng/L) ND 0.0096 0.0021 0.0027 0.0022 Indeno(1,2,3-Cd)Pyrene (Ng/L) ND ND ND 0.012 0.0098 Naphthalene (Ng/L) 0.0024 0.0034 0.0089 0.0035 0.0030 Phenanthrene (Ng/L) ND 0.010 0.0053 0.0051 0.0035 Pyrene (pg/L) 0.016 0.014 0.0062 0.0095 0.0044 Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) ND 10 ND ND ND Hardness (CaCO3), mg/L 98 1790 98 1300 110 ND = Not detected Lab analyses for PAH were limited to a few samples due to the cost of the lab analysis. The five water samples analyzed for PAH were collected at the Marsh outlet in all three seasons (fall, winter, spring), at lower Willow Creek in the fall, and at a site on the east edge of the Marsh in the spring. None of the 18 types of PAH analyzed for were detected at levels greater than 0.016 µg/L. The spring season samples had the greatest number of types of PAH detected. These PAH data and any standards that apply will be reviewed further during preparation of an annual report. These data will serve as baseline seasonal data for the Edmonds Marsh since they were collected on a seasonal basis and not targeted on storm events. Future samples taken during storm events can be compared to these baseline data to assess stormwater contribution to PAH in the creeks and Marsh. 32 Packet Pg. 110 6.1.a Macroinverteb rates Students scanned the water samples collected at upper Shell Creek and identified the macroinvertebrates in the samples using a dichotomous key. The identified macroinvertebrates were then assigned to their respective pollution tolerance groups as shown in the following table. Type of Macroinvertebrate Group 1: Intolerant of Pollution Group 2: Partially Tolerant of Pollution Group 3: Tolerant of Pollution aquatic snail x aquatic worm x blackfly larvae x caddisfly larvae x cranefly larvae x mayfly nymph x midge larvae x scud x stonefly larvae x The number of different types of macroinvertebrates in each group were summed and multiplied by a weighting factor (3 for Group 1, 2 for Group 2, and 1 for Group 3). The sum of the all the weighted values was then divided by the total number of macroinvertebrate types resulting in an index. The index value was compared to a quality ranking of 2.7+ being excellent; 2.0 to 2.6 being good; 1.6 to 1.9 being fair, and 0 to 1.5 being poor. Resulting student index scores ranged from 2.0 to 2.2 with the majority at 2.1 which falls in the `good' quality ranking. Community Outreach EWHS Students Saving Salmon members made several community presentations on the water quality project and the importance of healthy habitat and water quality for salmon and aquatic organisms. On October 13, 2015, four students gave a presentation to the Edmonds City Council about Students Saving Salmon and the planned water quality monitoring project. Students committed and the Council agreed to receive semi-annual reporting of the water quality results. Students also participated in and gave the same presentations at a October 28, 2015 Town Hall meeting in Edmonds. On March 11, 2016, students gave a presentation on initial water quality results at a Pilchuck Audubon meeting in Everett, WA. Several students also provided public testimony at a March 15, 2016 public hearing on the Edmonds City Council's proposed critical area regulations. On May 7, 2016, Students Saving Salmon had a table at the annual Edmonds Watershed Fun Fair where students explained the project to the public and answered questions about stormwater. Local newspaper articles written by the students or about the students appeared in My Edmonds News (2/14/15, 10/14/15, 11101115, 11111115, 11/19/15, 12/16/15, 01/18/16, 03/16/16), the Edmonds Beacon (10/22/15, 11/12/15, 01/14/16, 03/31/16), and the Everett Herald (11/23/15, 02/12/16, 03/16/16). 33 Packet Pg. 111 6.1.a Ten EWHS students participated in an introductory survey for spawning salmon in lower Shell Creek in November 2015 and met with local residents to discuss salmon occurrence. Although several chum salmon spawners were present, no spawning or obvious redds (i.e., gravel containing salmon eggs) were observed. DISCUSSION Water quality monitoring to date has not indicated any potentially serious water quality problems in the three creeks monitored. The main body of the Edmonds Marsh does not appear to have water quality problems though the Marsh would function better ecologically if saltwater intrusion occurred year-round. The edges of the Marsh had lower water quality, especially dissolved oxygen, likely due to the lack of water circulation. The `Willow Creek Daylighting Project' which will allow year-round tidal saltwater intrusion into the Marsh may improve water circulation on the edges of the Marsh. The current water quality monitoring project should continue as is so that annual trends can be evaluated and baseline information is established. Having a long term data series will allow for future comparisons to potential environmental or pollutant driven perturbations and potential effects of climate change. Collection of water samples for dissolved metal and petroleum -derived compounds analyses during storm events should be pursued contingent on grant funds to cover the expensive costs of lab analysis. Seasonal monitoring of all sites for fecal coliform should continue (as long as City agrees to analyze the samples), but with more intense sampling, perhaps 3-5 day consecutive samples, for the lower Shellabarger and Marsh sites. Although bacterial DNA testing is expensive, it may be beneficial to determine the source of the fecal coliform bacteria in the higher count samples (i.e., is it from dogs, birds, people, or other warm blooded animals). Several additional water parameters, such as turbidity and phosphorus levels, need to be collected by the project to make it more comparable to the state's ambient water quality monitoring program. The project is pursuing purchase of an electronic field photometer so that these additional important water parameters can be routinely collected as well as water hardness, alkalinity, and some dissolved metal levels. With the purchase of the photometer, we will be able to collect all of the standard parameters currently collected by the Washington Dept. of Ecology's program (which has been a project goal since inception). The photometer also can also be used to measure nitrates and dissolved oxygen and serve to periodically validate the measurements from the YSI Professional Plus instrument thus further ensuring quality data collection. The sites selected for monitoring appear to be adequate for assessing the health of each creek and Marsh. But, the project will be pursuing additional sites if sufficient numbers of students volunteer in the coming year. An additional site in the upper north fork of Shellabarger Creek 34 Packet Pg. 112 6.1.a (near Maple Street and 7th/8th avenues) and middle Shellabarger (at 5th Avenue) would provide more complete coverage of the entire Shellabarger drainage and allow us to better pin -point any water quality problems that may arise. Also, an additional site in middle Willow Creek (in Woodway) and possibly additional upper areas of Shell Creek may be beneficial. It would also be useful to sample the south edge of the Marsh along the old UnoCal property, but the WA Dept. of Ecology (who is overseeing cleanup of site) has advised they would not allow us access. The lower area of Shell Creek, just before it passes under the railroad tracks, would be an ideal area for conducting chum salmon spawning surveys and we will continue to seek the property owner's permission to access that area. The project has demonstrated that a citizen science project utilizing volunteer high school students can be successful in collecting good quality scientific data and providing students hands- on experience in conducting field science. The four student Stream Teams stayed intact through the entire school year with at least one student present at each monitoring site every month. In spite of their ongoing array of extra -curricular high school activities and involvement in sports, band and family activities, the students upheld their initial commitment to fully participate in the water quality monitoring project. Students adhered to the field sampling protocols in spite of adverse weather in the winter and ensured quality data was collected throughout the school year. From the students' perspective, the project has provided them valuable experience that they can use as they pursue college education and careers in environmental sciences. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the City Council continue to support this citizen science project utilizing high school students. It not only provides needed baseline data on the condition of several Edmonds streams and the Marsh, but also provides students with training and practical field experience in the use of actual data to address environmental issues. This is especially important to those students who want to pursue an environmental science career. The water quality of Shell Creek needs to be kept optimal for salmon in order to support the naturally occurring spawning run of chum salmon. Other creeks, such as Shellabarger Creek, that are impacted by development and piped channels, also need to have good water quality not only for potential salmon use in remaining usable salmon habitat, but to ensure the watershed contributes to good water quality in downstream areas such as the Edmonds Marsh and Puget Sound. We urge the City to move rapidly to complete the `Willow Creek Daylighting' project as that will improve the ecological functions of the Marsh by allowing unrestricted daily tidal exchange of saltwater and salmon access. 35 Packet Pg. 113 6.1.a There are a number of actions that can be taken in Edmonds to ensure good water quality. Improvements can still be made to enhance the survival of aquatic organisms and foster recovery of salmon. The following is a list of some actions that the community can take to maintain or improve water quality and habitat conditions for salmon. • Eliminate use of chemical fertilizers; use organic fertilizers sparingly • Eliminate use of pesticides near streams and reduce/eliminate use where they can enter streams • Clean up after pets (i.e., pick-up dog poop) • Eliminate detergents and contaminants going into storm drains - wash cars at a carwash or on lawn • Fix auto oil leaks and avoid fluid leaks/spills • Encourage the State to pursue treatment of highway runoff • Encourage better management of stormwater • Pursue methods of eliminating roadway contaminants such as advanced technology street sweepers • Install more rain gardens • Require low impact development (LID) and green building along streams and wetlands • Encourage use of permeable pavement/concrete for parking lots and driveways • Improve/enhance stream/wetland habitat • Remove invasive plant species • Provide large, densely vegetated (with native shrubs and trees) streamside areas • Remove obstacles to salmon passage (e.g., Shell Creek passage barrier near 7th and Glen St.) • Avoid construction of structures or impervious pavement near streams and wetlands • Pursue funding sources for conservation easements or streamside property acquisitions • Improve regulatory regimes to better protect/preserve streamside and wetland habitat. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to all of the EWHS students who volunteered to participate in the field monitoring program, through good weather and rainstorms: Arisbeth Acosta, Sergel Amar, Mrad Amar, Lindsey Barnes, Autumn Beeghley, Katharina Brinschwitz, Pavi Chance, Joe Cooper, Fatima Fatty, Andie Foster, Luis Guerrero, Justin Heckt, Sam Kleven, Emily McLaughlin Sta. Maria, Rondi Nordal, YeJi Oh and Afua Tiwaa. We also thank the adult volunteers who accompanied the project leader in the field: Valerie Stewart, Peggy Foreman, Nancy Scordino, Geoff Bennett and Dave Millette. Sound Salmon Solutions, Edmonds Salmon Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Puget SoundKeeper Alliance, and Edmonds City Council member Neil Tibbot also joined us in our field monitoring. 36 Packet Pg. 114 6.1.a We thank the City of Edmonds, especially the Public Works Department and Mike Cawrse, for their support and assistance in designing and implementing the project, providing access to the Marsh outlet basin, assisting in contacting Edmonds residents to gain access to their property for water monitoring, and for analyzing our water samples for fecal coliform bacteria. Special thanks to Jeanne McKenzie at the Lab for analyzing the water samples and conducting demonstrations for the students (and accommodating our sometimes late delivery of water samples with a smile!). We appreciate the encouragement from the Edmonds City Council, especially Diane Buckshnis, and Mayor Earling for funding support for operational expenses. The funding has allowed us to purchase critically needed calibration fluids, outreach materials, field supplies and a new photometer that will allow collection of additional water parameters that otherwise can't be measured. The project would not have been possible without Hubbard Foundation grant funds that were used by the Edmonds School District to purchase the professional multiparameter water quality instrument. Special thanks to Dave Millette, Geoff Bennett and school district administration staff for helping secure the grant and purchase the water quality meter from YSI. Grant funds from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and Google.org were used to pay the costs for dissolved metals and petroleum -derived compound analyses at an accredited laboratory (ALS Environmental Laboratory in Everett, WA). We thank EarthCorps, especially Keeley O'Connell and Pipo Bui, for sponsoring and administering these grants for us. We thank Rosalind (Rosie) Billharz, microbiology instructor at North Seattle Community College, for having our water samples tested by college student for coliform bacteria and allowing EWHS students to participate. We also thank Kelley Govan, with Sound Salmon Solutions, for training students on macroinvertebrates. Special thanks to all the Edmonds property owners, especially Jenny Anttila, Ruth Blaikie, Lynn Lawrence, Edmonds Park Apartments, Willow Creek Condominiums and Edmonds City Parks Department, for allowing students on their property to access the stream monitoring sites. Ruth Blaikie also provided local knowledge perspectives on salmon occurrence in lower Shell Creek to students. REFERENCES Carter, K. 2005a. The effects of dissolved oxygen on steelhead trout, coho salmon, and Chinook salmon biology and function by life stage. California Regional Water Quality Control Board. North Coast Region, Santa Rosa, California. 37 Packet Pg. 115 6.1.a Carter, K. 2005b. The effects of temperature on steelhead trout, coho salmon, and Chinook salmon biology and function by life stage. Implications for the Klamath River total maximum daily loads. California Regional Water Quality Control Board. North Coast Region, Santa Rosa, California. CH2M HILL. 2004. SR 104, Edmonds Crossing Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Washington State Department of Transportation, and City of Edmonds. Herrera Environmental Consultants Inc. and City of Edmonds Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 2010. Storm and Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan - City of Edmonds. City of Edmonds Public Works Department/Engineering Division. Johnson, L.L., M.R. Arkoosh, C.F. Bravo, T.K. Collier, M.M. Krahn, J.P. Meador, M.S. Myers, W.L. Reichert and J.E. Stein. 2008. The effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish from Puget Sound, Washington. In book: The Toxicology of Fishes. Kemker, C. 2013. Dissolved oxygen. Fundamentals of environmental measurements. Fondriest Environmental, Inc. Accessed at http://www.fondriest.com/environmental- measurements/parameters/water-quality/dissolved-oxygen/ Kemker, C. 2013. pH of Water. Fundamentals of Environmental Measurements. Fondriest Environmental, Inc. Accessed at http://www.fondriest.com/environmental- measurements/parameters/water-quality//ph/ Kemker, C. 2014. Conductivity, salinity and total dissolved solids. Fundamentals of environmental measurements. Fondriest Environmental, Inc. Accessed at http : //www. fondriest. com/environmental-measurements/parameters/water- quality/conductivity-salinity-tds/ Kerwin, J. 2001. Salmon and steelhead habitat limiting factors report for the Cedar - Sammamish basin (Water Resource Inventory Area 8). Washington Conservation Commission. Olympia, WA Scholz, N.L., M.S. Myers, S.G. McCarthy, J.S. Labenia, J.K. McIntyre, G.M. Ylitalo, L.D. Rhodes, C.A. Laetz, C.M. Stehr, B.L. French, B. McMillan, D. Wilson, L. Reed, K.D. Lynch, S. Damm, J.W. Davis and T.K. Collier. 2011. Recurrent die -offs of adult coho salmon returning to spawn in Puget Sound lowland urban streams. PLoS ONE 6(12): e28013. Sea -Run Consulting, TetraTech, Inc., Reid Middleton, Inc. and Pentec. 2007. City of Edmonds Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Inventory & Characterization. Report prepared for the City of Edmonds. 38 Packet Pg. 116 6.1.a Shannon and Wilson, Inc. 2013. Willow Creek Daylighting - Final Early Feasibility Study. Report submitted to Edmonds Stormwater Engineering Program. Spromberg, J.A., D.H. Baldwin, S.E. Damm, J.K. McIntyre, M. Huff, C.A. Sloan, B.F. Anulacion, J.W. Davis and N.L. Scholz. 2015. Coho salmon spawner mortality in western US urban watersheds: bioinfiltration prevents lethal storm water impacts. J. App. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12534. Stein, R.A., P.E. Reimers, and J.D. Hall. 1972. Social interactions between juvenile coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and fall chinook (O. tshawytscha) in Sixes River, Oregon. Journal of Fisheries Resources Board of Canada. 29(12): 1737-1748. Todd, G.D., R.L. Chessin and J. Colman. 1999. Toxicological profile for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). U.S. Dept. Health and Human Services publication. Von Prause, M. 2014. River and Stream Water Quality Monitoring Report, Water Year 2013 Washington Department of Ecology Publication No. 14-03-047. Vuori, K. 1995. Direct and indirect effects of iron on river ecosystems. Ann, Zool. Fennici 32: 317-329. 39 Packet Pg. 117 6.1.a APPENDIX 1. CITY OF EDMONDS WATERSHEDS WPrnslrcd4 in dre Cry dfdrm reds ramie of vwf7 ecru, nhdm,uain eirfrcrm ArgetSuuadortalPkeBalNnga fwhidl flows m lake Wz*oy vn mtdrhm RW SoaaC,'. ,llanyaPPkrrn fLt:NRdSFJr and CJR.1bin r Oi ,n fifMm(hPnnF15 CRd PndFf.]rWRdp.'fnS.!hLIIRL�*(QfOPnd P�yes rafm duvn parr farm dmins amtedrm paved mats avdpadrrnglats, and uhkh RnwiRm dawnvw. venter Wa Allot the fotlowingwatershedAmin directly to Puget sound: OMeadcwdale-rnas�nt nmEt n:.mom>.umax r5ndexhrmlantAnr�peh amRmxn�npmmnryam,tm Ld—.-arymm�;wnd:rdmt mem,omr"r .. Fmnmdtta Ppd rh"nn chat mloxs h. Maadvrolde Pl; Ihana.sp:an Pmna a'mg Mwdwdalr&ediX hthds—I pp,,Wq. dunruti.,—x m760k W beoremxvq:hughnety .dASAeNkerireamm[nal property. Therwnh spbmdrdmanareaamom lMNk AYandiba uLL klEofWLnearltwWm PerADVllle 5-1 PrA Ann manage t�,M. h. b1th Fin..h rdLgmn.KmiWbun M f—n drainage rhesWunn dWkftbneer pmpftkwDI d NhARWPoxslh.�S lhtre-Lanry FA.mdmo<snudesrdhatPo wNVSautd ©Talbot Palk -rx� manage:mm�:m,a ts:n:.mMMed, xela ubro rmma d wpps Frui[dale-smn mans dglgnl n an tpanammr mm� wn 25w ar�n are rlxeta tuu�.uamanwnptww nne mm mom ulna owtr �. and srearae.r� QNoithsiream Thu wean flax, inap, dmnel m mmfdmlaigaa 4—ddmoatlaMkb b d.9emin Mapbmed Peb Ix.11--d nutgnlermurs ealyn Edmnd'11�rA OShell Creek teadaalmameadmr�Lt�slnrmtlam ne Rxd nttunRmm�rtdaae ns[�WetaL;rc m.s Pnmaekm�ncamusnxlmer,xtry.mmmrhnmme�,nd v.[rr�Lhasmerssd��d.ua . Hindley [reek ml: vumrms:n P ma:lry apm rmnnda�aandamx ppa saanz sxthramrdtaa. Yan dmm dram QGood HQPBPvnd Lmw aMualbMln PbendgePad,-hepondmim,Mrmxaxrtuma PO fattath' Skna M and a wwmw M 4wk gtng Wmq mi- nwhepmd Pemhl"I" gwmaM teurzxfassping<In riA ftr 6heII5M7ad MaplramdvaklMMcr�ml rvmghph flR., me met vreman- Naa Free M wAI Geak �Wes[gate Pand ; mumIbvA-hal Nl—moiavkmun—mrduAW swandPmantrwandtmmmm�ngn•am,lomRlL,�u � Edmon ds Mama ThIL wand m: damdmymlraralams.aWs�. Wd_ds MaMre:etresmanagehanfie mmedx.a amaam •mn AxlaWrpar WIIae M.I, the tmnh mrm2:a nga. 5-d rough al m400[bg ptpe dia tndiatgnlmt mush m WaCommd:Manta c.« �Shelia6a[ge[-unnatta�mr,� 1mk,%t pr _ r.�r.n ye.mn mawwe&arpvmme QWilloNCmek-le—t—aradatvewur 5J is 01 roenrsmrrtt�rarrts�.ptrrtt.r / 11het�.lkl.�rGd Ntlxrt6& Rkr.Abr a9S Pne 9,pa n�hannax,de ramn7s .� ® Edmonds Way A hrgu tl'dtuge :rVMHNIn SR,I LWA""' . rnrenhmfduwtd - E h,&W,yu nre s— �. aamxtttrarabwm ad emapanoPuge . SrNSRrir O tle5lmok _\` ' LWn tuhsgv�hnmer I hpmma�aur I uene[erh rms�l�k§�ytm� t Puget Sound- P i daikftipSaaxa detMwmru�tswm rWwtPPene row mat�aam[a `o--- I �neerC[eek- lo..tl u�uem[um drmds.rn• I I S.n dwbedq / 1'Lf F, �j,�lLfi�S I 1 I t - Jf fJ1 I LYi'Is'11P199U i �] SCOD01 Wa1e1811eLL notmeary - Patl[ Glnek asrrcam These watersheds drain into lake Washington, which flows to Puget Sound: Halls Creek-amarahmm�rlake 8altinger-xs,n�Lad�ma�n Id&Ad�tp w91-W —.— FAman&B— �Y L,nmu1gtr,nhoeea011-1 nln LgnmteWdLEkLdre.,LInhlmodm nrrm mdmlak PrMtgr.ln ldtmnf< spYnalmrl�f�nld&Bt1Y4r mmalvlYdkerfaedsHeaeNegtaa.radmeb4 xhlm stPad.7YM Hnmdow at'tS e fmmtratsnagwme nee! P.A d deal pzi dL kW.Nngw. r�LtMmam nmmanatm pmdtaawr�lt�m 40 Packet Pg. 118 6.1.a APPENDIX 2. MONITORING SITES Go maps gle . 4in4rr IL ' O ' drxlxrr* � •� z 2 3 ){il448N41 ¢' { MI R @ 4 'q'6,9i Glen Sr t �i� C;ya ornr si .i mfSm"Yh i[ar 4 r{yhpM ff .pragoe 91 S em .- g a ryr h`n�7e ij e+ak (Q vl m An. rrak arlr.<--EpN® ' *� pe!q.��' T '.� v ky. ? I � � > , 'TWIN?,Ca�i ' wn S; : [ryWi, SI m rrg�. i. r. n.A:: V.plr sr Mnro�m .YualFWx i L .� aN.r • Li AkLrfi Aidrrst .la;T $I Kid L��7�f/ ��' A-6i 712gt8 +�+ u !ii idFq.tp,[: li11'NS .. n 17,. at � A.l q'.pA, �}'allo,r E'rcd-nnnar [7NI :1v_F iFlm �Ixn; F[1 S4almv e.rea.krvxr;R'illux CrwkllnLarrs{I'1nu3l ntW LJw�]W:�1 N �kd C.1 g4rllnlyy6�3..3�y �+ntr sndnI m (7[i nw S and l:ir 4m r 7 'sw rc,r St !lino- F;t ll,l piKegt Pa 9hcllyd�rruer l.Yxk.ua:cerrniddle 6cak("LL,Lre46eLxam3pLwas md[hnduud. Sll Shdlnhaa:s Cklx ucpCi&.1p lMk(MAiL`arLd MPle SLt �� - Fri 51_u:IldhOEW a 4L. 1m Kelm CLl GaF.fit Fmxrlh Ln n C_1 :�I Crcri�avncr CYL>r+ IMk� L.alTMaiu Sl ad Vpmple Aw) O . .:1 v w SStir�6.4!�C llh n.t ti sld Lilcn S[` P S i0 Fi5 ti,2 Chell t:rc&-,- idAl iCmmers Sven and 71h A-1 N !w n •CL t.J �ylrxrr {hdl L.reaF4 YJ4ir(bL 3hsix1-m30 Ol-aihanClracls? LL x •• . Sli:wkmxr {Hrnnkmere ihnxi ytll,:Lr'`a HE o .Li11 :.Mlahm�p.mr Alnrcll Iaz cWrurt mcwlxidL: nIHLw LU1l •"�2" ` 3L1 EJuussklryj��la'4�Uer. �Ln ues[aide�fFivntFuy 'p 7in ;1• Ek " 2'ICQi 3 IS,2 Lry 1..1 hnnir,uW Wrr=h. rasuem edr iHny lUyi ni:r]h qp&Lrim rRman i L=:uu3}b1iu5�, L;uLlLSFL u�eC lCfdkdlL eu[vd*aK}tertlnr ygnnrc plltin8lrr} •L O C704* l: s3 T.I "anm:r mnme wiLr WDa lnntr:rcubars+Mf hur Squurapurliuphx} Td-nr}3s Minh Lcrlmr mlfWLhluut Cl�aiL liaid Gaun lG.4lrcd]e laertlnC Lo4 . / .A� X P.1 14V2p.L •mot l,,..•, Nil H. ooknicrc Ilnitl O ..ti a-2 Vinilky C.—I. middle iAlh Al N.d L]iM[,y Lane; 41 Packet Pg. 119 6.1.a 42 LO ti N L O Q N� S L O .E CO C E E d L N C O E W r C d E t v R .r r a Packet Pg. 120 6.1.a APPENDIX 3. WATER QUALITY DATA SHEET W2iTER �U-41f11' DATA SHEET K%hTE i YT 3bwt T1 BYd: MTREF w IQ WWSM of Carpal Qjpp-7L— C"Z .'A'paS reftrrv.rt leg 1E � or Lb—h-- --rde#",a—t nw.--d —.k: Tilt• "N flo aanplty PK.1 [WE mo dG I VM3.M% MA�U Ma SITE DE CC IF71ON M..pwa it M .—t Yb.i.e [.Adr Depth flr.d..4 MUMM [Mdt. a cnar.r.d Clratl w.b. cl .MF *Zk— UAW, P —w mtr Q °re4 [.ram Flow Mmit mm d01r. mnaerrcnL-W--k.a .�:• 9Qtwm 342p=d5 (2-1 dcolptl—) tt-nW Lnr wpm.. f�CF`Jal d�WIJ T1E.ATFER {MATFA dayRonf CLU[ rr f.dld.Y "b h-- 41*'."'.^.% t—.M 1IOfFJ AwT4.v-1w -F W r.d ftM r-ods�, rUh } CS# d Lacl -M&M TTPE im wwwo e" mad fm�mxk_II f6 Lissuert.� x LE4ILIREHE3Y'rt -Tm Noler.Q Lisa Nor. wm=T40rummba° = 3ar,4' ItALI "a M—h-d EhWo— IDOW.I FP ..r •m--ah—I HtraI LY. If17, HI 11Rgi Dk. t-d EbrM— 03-M ^"4 - Ph o.phk- ape. m C°..du.A.— I3PI pE&I. T1.134My ou.uln r.ft I c ] ldw� €nfror fubf MW Tabs Dft.* .d 5.0daCM14 Yx cpu a fd-1W VMTER za.an C Tmy Ctr Lzt Afmfl Tommm 47T= 3 ar—mg fa 0--,gramrmMmmMTnkk3MjM% rrtl.Y�m-+arxe: rr Af k.—Ir*&dwm -} M—M—r &..0 a= irrVft 0.01r ID nlnd—, 43 ti N T �r O NNd LPL S L- O O 2 E <4 N H E fC N L U) N C O E W ++ Cd G t V m -W Q Packet Pg. 121 6.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Presentation of a Change Order with Razz Construction, Inc. For the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project (10 min.) Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On February 9, 2016, Council awarded the contract for the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project to Razz Construction. On May 17, 2016, Staff provided a project update and preliminary budget to the City Council for additional repairs to the Fishing Pier. Staff Recommendation Forward this item to the June 21st consent agenda for the following actions: 1). Increase the total Project Budget to $1,900,000. 2). Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract change order for $227,078 to complete additional repair work. Narrative The City's Contractor for the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project uncovered extensive damage along the pier edges during the initial phase of demolition work. Substantial damage was found in the existing rebar and concrete due to moisture penetration within the interior of the pier structure. The amount of damage was beyond the scope of work and contract price of the original construction contract. The Contractor's cost proposal to complete the additional repair work is $429,110. The cost will be partially offset by decreasing Bid Item 3 for Edge Spall/ Delamination Repair by $109,800 and deleting Bid Item 14 for Unexpected Repair Work for $92,232. The total cost of the Change Order is $227,078. In addition to the change order cost for the repair work, costs related to construction management and other construction changes are necessary to complete the project. The total project budget is now estimated at $1.9M and the extra costs are outlined in the attached revised budget. The City has secured additional funding from the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office to pay for the increased project cost. The revised project budget and funding will be reviewed during staffs presentation. Attachments: Copy of Budget Summary - 06-9-16 REV with WDFW Packet Pg. 122 Draft Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Budget Summary 6/8/2016 Contract Number: E4MB/c443 Funding Source Funding Amount 132 Parks Fund $100,000.00 Direct Appropriation WDFW $800,000.00 Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account Funding $500,000.00 WDFW $50,000.00 Proposed Additional RCO Funding $450,000.00 Total Funding $1,900,000.00 Expenses - Contractor F/A DetTnermine ate Total Amount EstimatedAdditional Costs Contract Days Contract Award $917,185.00 $917,185.00 76 CO #1 - Temp Lighting $3,834.08 $3,834.08 0 CO #2 - Edge Repair Investigation X $7,964.57 $7,964.57 0 CO #2/CCD #3 - Nav Light Bases, Bollards & Junction Box X $82.55 TBD $2,000.00 0 CCD #4 - Galvanized Guard Rails & Light Poles -$8,898.01 -$8,898.01 0 CCD #5 - 3 x 8 Trestle Railings -$321.52 -$321.52 0 CCD #9 - Mob/Demob for WF Festival X $2,776.46 $2,776.46 0 RCI #5 - ADA Guardrail Modifications/3 x 8 Pier Railings $11,444.90 $11,444.90 0 RCI #9 - Two Extended Wind Shelters $8,757.38 $8,757.38 TBD RCI #10 - Weather Display Enclosure Heater $363.31 $361.31 0 RCI #11 - Light Pole Wiring $439.03 $439.03 0 RCI #12 - Edge Repair Pier $372,196.46 $372,196.46 49 ??? Bid Item 14 - Unexpected Repair Work -$84,000.00 -$84,000.00 0 Bid Item 3 - Edge S all/Delamination Repair, 500 of 525 SF -$100,000.00 -$100,000.00 0 RCI #13 - Anodes at Joint Repair $18,613.51 $18,613.51 TBD RCI #14 - Guardrail Support Angle $683.22 $683.22 0 RCI #16 - Pier Electrical Outlets $1,847.20 $1,847.20 0 Change Order No.1, Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 Attachment: Copy of Budget Summary - 06-9-16 REV with WDFW (1302 : Fishing Pier Rehab Change Order) Printed: 6/9/2016 N iu RCI #17 - Work Platform Costs for Bid Item 3 $37,710.91 $37,710.91 0 Project Management Costs for Additional Repairs $38,616.81 $38,616.81 N/A Expedited Schedule - 6 Day Week, Complete 2 Weeks Early X TBD $26,000.00 TBD Total Adjustment $1,229,295.86 $1,229,211.31 $28,000.00 Sales Tax @ 9.8% 1 $120,470.991 $120,462.711 $2,744.00 Total Contractor Expenses Plus Tax 1 $1,349,766.85 $1,349,674.021 $30,744.00 Expenses - Consultants & Agencies To Date Total Amount Additional Costs Status Interpretive Signs (including tax) - City/WDFW $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Project Management - WDFW $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 Estimated at 20% Engineering - Berger ABAM $56,802.95 $78,544.00 $36,100.00 Proposal Construction Management - HWA $21,910.00 $61,376.00 $6,609.00 Proposal Testing Lab Services - Krazan $4,530.00 $24,685.00 $17,750.00 Proposal Staff Time Thru April $25,466.83 $35,000.00 $21,000.00 Estimated at 60% Total Consultant Expenses $138,709.78 $229,605.00 $82,459.00 Total Funding Available Total Current $1,900,000.00 Total Expenses Determined & Estimated Total Total Expenses $1,692,482.02 Management Reserve $207,517.98 Total Expenses + Contingency $1,900,000.00 % of Grant Funding for A & E Services 16.42 % Change Order No.1, Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 Attachment: Copy of Budget Summary - 06-9-16 REV with WDFW (1302 : Fishing Pier Rehab Change Order) Printed: 6/9/2016 M N iu 6.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Presentation on the Stormwater Code Update (30 min.) Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History For information only. Staff Recommendation None. Narrative The City of Edmonds is a Department of Ecology Phase II Western Washington Municipal Stormwater Permittee. As a Phase II permit holder, the City is required to update our stormwater code by December 31, 2016 to meet the minimum requirements of the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This includes reviewing and revising all development -related codes, rules, and standards to incorporate and require Low Impact Development principles and best management practices to make Low Impact Development the preferred and commonly used approach to site development. The goal is to infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff onsite to the extent feasible. The City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Herrera on May 11, 2015, to revise/update Edmonds Community Development Code 18.30 and Stormwater Supplement/Addendum and provide public outreach support. Subsequent to this Council briefing, public outreach meetings will be held, along with a public hearing before City Council. Attachments: Presentation Packet Pg. 125 Stormwater Code Council Briefing J IIJ r i � 14977-jD15 (e) Packet Pg. 126 History of the Citys Stormwater Code a (9411 --- � It - � Packet P9 . 127 Drivers for 2016 Code Revisions r 2013-2018 Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Permit)0 4) ..- 3 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Cn Western Washington (Ecology's Manual) M 0 N d L a (Essentially identical requirements for 87 "NPDES E z Phase II" municipalities across western Washington) (AY I Packet P9 . 128 6.3.a Overview of Permit Requirements S5.C.4.a - Controlling Runoff from New Development, Q Redevelopment and Construction Sites 0 U L R E L O Implement an ordinance or other enforceable mechanism that addresses runoffCn M from new development, redevelopment, and construction site projects. The M ordinance or other enforceable mechanism shall include, at a minimum, the o Minimum Requirements, thresholds, and definitions in Appendix 1 [of the NPDES Permit] or a program approved by Ecology under the 2013 NPDES Phase I Municipal Stormwater Permit, for new development, redevelopment, and construction sites. a Packet P9 . 129 Overview of Permit Requirementc (Cont.) S5.C.4.a - Controlling Runoff from New Development, Q Redevelopment and Construction Sites 0 U L The local requirements shall include site planning, Best Management Practice (BMP) selection and design, and BMP infeasibility criteria. o Cn M The program shall include a permitting process with site plan review, inspection M and enforcement capability to meet the standards listed, for both private and o public projects. The program shall include provisions to verify adequate long- term operation and maintenance of stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities that are permitted and constructed pursuant to the above. These provisions shall be in place no later than December 31, 2016. a Packet P9 . 130 Overview of Permit Requirementc (Cont.) r Most substantial change has to do with new Low Impact Development requirements (Permit,- "Minimum Requirement #5") E 0 Affects small projects (>2,000 s . ft. of impervious) -- 0 More complex site assessment requirements N d L a Additional City review requirements E a (94- 1 Packet P9 . 131 Overview of Chapter 18.30 Revisions Code Section Existing/Proposed Section Titles 18.30.000 Purposes. 18.30.010 Definitions. 18.30.020 Authority and Regulation. 18.30.030 Applicability. 18.30.040 "a..ninmstFatier. Exemptions. 18.30.050 PFejeet Glassifieatien. Administration. 18.30.060 SteFm wateF management (Requirements. 18.30.070 €xen9ptieffs, Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeal. 18.30.080 Easengents, deed -a,- Access and Covenants. 18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities. 18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures. 18.30.110 1 Notice and Hearing on Adoption of Rules. 1 18.30.120 1 Rules to be Filed. a Packet P 9 . 132 6.3.a Notable Proposed Code Revisions Definitions —(Ch. 18.30.010) 0 ■ Revising 28 terms to be consistent with the latest NPDES permit definitions, as well as for consistency with general stormwater E 0 practices. M O M ■ Adding 28 new terms to be consistent with the latest NPDES permit 0 definitions, and for clarity of new or changed code requirements. (E.g., "bioretention" and "hard surface") L * Deleting 9 terms no longer used in the revised code, or defined in other code sections. (E.g., "critical area" and "variance") Packet P9 . 133 6.3.a Notable Code Revisions (Cont.) � Authority & Regulations (Ch. 18.30.020)CU 0 A. Clarifying that the Director has authority to enforce the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. E L O v/ B. Adding — Statement that the requirements of this chapter are M 0 M minimum requirements. 0 c. Adding — That the Director shall have the authority to impose L additional requirements. D, Adding — Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws. r Adding — Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all impacts to the environment. Packet Pg. 134 6.3.a Notable Code Revisions (Cont.) Stormwater management requirementsCU (Ch. 18.3 0.0 6 0) 0 U m r R 3 Adopting by reference: o 1. Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, Appendix 1, M modification date January 16, 2015 0 2. Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, 2014 N L The Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (in development) E a Substantial changes to 18.30.060 for equivalency with Ecology's requirements in the 2013-2018 NPDES Phase II permit and 2014 Manual (see subsequent slides). (04- � Packet Pg. 135 6.3.a Notable Code Revisions (Cont.) � Stormwater management requirements (Ch. 18.30.060) New connections to the City's system: Specific to sites that do not meet the definition of new or redevelopment (i.e., no development activity) �. May be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval. For sites > 2,000 sq. ft. of impervious area, requirements associated with stormwater flow control and/or water quality treatment may be required if the drainage poses a risk/threat to downstream systems/properties. CU 0 U L R 0 M M 0 L IL E a OPacket P9 . 136 Notable Code Revisions (Cont.; r MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #4 —Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls ° V -W Folding in old Min. Req. #10 — Off -site Analysis and Mitigation into Min. Req. #4, to capture smaller CO) projects ° N Less rigorous requirements for smaller projects. "Qualitative" assessment of off -site issues. a (94- 1 Packet P9 . 137 6.3.a Notable Code Revisions (Cont.; MINIMUM REQUIREMENT# Management Min. Requirements #1 - #5: r 5 — On -site Stormwater a M • > 2,000 sq. ft. new and replaced hard surface area, or M • > 7,000 sq. ft. land disturbance Min. Requirements #1 - #9: ti _ CD d L a E • > 5,000 sq. ft. new and replaced hard surface area, or • > 3/4 acre vegetation to lawn/landscape, or • > 2.5 acres native vegetation to pasture (02 Packet Pg. 138 Notable Code Revisions (Cont. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5: (Implementation) .... f n1 no _ ma �i O L Projects List # 1, or 3 triggering MR LID Performance # 1-#5 only Standard Applies M C rt+ i d N d L Projects List # 2, or triggering MR LID Performance Standard Applies (MAJ. I Packet P9 . 139 Notable Code Revisions (Cont.) MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5: (List Option) a pv� VRoofsWW I 00 0 Other Hard Surface, -a ti 3 E L 0 Cn M 0 M a Consider all the BMPs in the order listed and use the first BMP that is considered feasible. (94- 1 Packet P9 . 140 Notable Code Revisions (Cont.) MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5: (List Option) 1. Soil Quality and Depth rqFofs Other Hard Surface mwRo r _ -f LE p 1. Full Dispersion or Downspout Full Infiltration 2. Rain Gardens [or Bioretention] 3. Downspout Dispersion Systems 4. Perforated Stub -out Connections 1. Full Dispersion 2. Permeable Pavement [or Rain Gardens or Bioretention] 3. Sheet Flow Dispersion, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion a (94- 1 Packet P9 . 141 Notable Code Revisions (Cont. I MINIMUM REQUIREMENT#5: (LID Performance Q Standard Option) 0 ° L d i Achieved using hydraulic/hydrologic modeling (typically requires o professional engineering support) M 0 M r LID Performance Standard addresses lower, more frequent stormwater flows N d L IL r c m E z a (94- 1 Packet P9 . 142 Notable Code Revisions (Cont. I MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5: to Permit Q (Impacts Process) O -W d k Extensive new parcel -scale BMP installations 3 0 ■ Generally increases developer site investigation, design, and construct M r level of effort 0 Increases City review and inspection effort L a r Improved stormwater and water quality control, dispersed among sitE and close to source of impact a (94- 1 Packet P9 . 143 Notable Code Revisions (Cont.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT#5: (Retrofitting unmanaged impervious areas) I� 47 'in s Existing Site Existing Parking Lot to Remain — Stormwater Management will need to be provided for a minimum of 25% of the existing surface area. Remove Existing Structure & Replace with New Structure — Stormwater Management will need to be provided for New Impervious Surface Area 0 3 E 0 Cn CO) 0 M 0 IL d L d a OPacket P9 . 144 Notable Code Revisions (Cont.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT#5: (Projects not draining to the City's system) ■ 1 For example, drains to BNSF system or direct to Puget Sound: To off -site private property: obtain permission from owner (e.g., BNSF) Direct to Puget Sound: apply subset of Min. Req. #5 List (per Ecology) Manage on -site: apply Min. Req. #5 List with geotechnical analysis Pump to City system: with approval, and with capacity analysis a (94- 1 Packet P9 . 145 6.3.a Notable Code Revisions (Cont.) i Access and Covenants (Ch. 18.30.080) Revising language for compliance with NPDES Permit: A. Access. Proper ingress and egress shall be provided to the City for inspection. The City shall notify the responsible party in writing of a failure to provide access. B. Covenants. Maintenance covenants shall be required for each site/lot that will be maintained by a private entity. The maintenance covenant shall address requirements and responsibilities for long-term management and maintenance of the applicable BMP(s). CU 0 U m r R 3 E 0 M 0 M IL E a Packet P9 . 146 Summary ■ Major Code revisions driven by NPDES Permit compliance. Primary change relates to low impact development and "on -site" BM Ps. � Generally requires additional project effort, and City review effort 9 Similar to over 80 similar municipalities Code to be "adopted and effective no later than December 31, 2016" a (94- 1 Packet P9 . 147 6.3.a Schedule/Statu.s- ff July 20 — Public outreach meetings a July 2016 — Second City Council briefing (if significant changes to draft code) i Aug. 2, 2016 — City Council Public Hearing r Aug. 16, 2016 — City Council Action Item (Seeking approval of code with an effective date of Jan 1, 2017) • Late Summer/Fall 2016 — completion of Stormwater Addendum. Development of implementation tools (e.g., review checklists) CU 0 U L E L O M M 0 M IL c� G a Packet Pg. 148 6.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Discussion of Draft Ordinance Amending ECC 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System) to Clarify the Definition of Misuse and to Amend the Penalty Provisions (5 min.) Staff Lead: Jim Lawless Department: Police Services Preparer: James Lawless Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Staff recommends and requests that this draft ordinance be carried forward to the June 21, 2016 Council Business Meeting for adoption by full Council via Consent Agenda. Narrative Edmonds City Code 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System) has been in effect in its current form since 1999. Many of the provisions and penalties called for in the current ordinance are impractical and/or not possible. The amendments presented clarify the definition of misuse in order to better reflect the current technology and impacts of such abuse. In addition, the amendments provide for a subject who has abused 911, thereby creating a risk to public safety, to be charged with a misdemeanor. There are numerous examples of individuals tying up 911 emergency lines with non -emergent calls. In the most egregious cases, subjects call multiple times, even after being directed not to do so. Within the past several months, one example involved a subject calling 911 seventy-three times within a 12 hour patrol shift. It is situations such as this that these amendments are intended to address. This ordinance have been prepared and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. Attachments: DRAFT Ordinance Clarifying and Amending Penalty Provisions of ECC 5.214.22.16 (2) Packet Pg. 149 6.4.a [1 '71 AMEN A [$I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 5.21 (MISUSE OF THE 911 OR EMERGENCY CALL SYSTEM) TO CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF "MISUSE" AND TO AMEND THE PENALTY PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has determined that there is a need for clarification of the definition of "misuse" in ECC 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System); and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has determined that there is a need to amend the penalty provisions of that code section; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds wishes to revise ECC 5.21 to clarify the definition of "misuse" and amend the penalty provisions as recommended by City staff; NOW, THEREFORE, AS FOLLOWS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN Section 1. Section 5.21 of the ECC Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System is hereby amended to read as follows (deleted text in strike -through; new text in underline): 5.21.010 Purpose. This chapter is intended to reduce the number of false requests for emergency assistance or similar misuse of the 911 emergency response system which occur within the city and result in waste of city resources and/or the creation of a public safety by providing for certain penalties for such misuse. 5.21.020 Definitions. The following persons or words used in this chapter shall be defined as set forth in this section: A."Person" includes any natural person, partnership, joint stock company, unincorporated association of society, or corporation of any character whatsoever; and B. "Misuse of the 911 system" is a request for emergency response when no actual emergency exists and when the caller does not have a good faith basis to request -1- Packet Pg. 150 6.4.a emergency assistance. This definition includes false reporting, as that term is defined under RCW 9A.84.040, and telephone harassment, as that term is defined under RCW 9.61.230. This chapter shall not be applicable to mechanical activations of requests for assistance which are dealt with in Chapter 5.20 ECC, nor shall it be interpreted to impose liability on any person who makes a good faith request for emergency assistance based on a reasonable factual basis that an emergency situation exists. 5.21.030 Misuse of the 911 system - Designated. It shall be unlawful for any person to misuse the 911 system. It shall be an affirmative defense that the person charged has a good faith, reasonable factual basis for the request. 5.21.040 Misuse of the 911 system - PeesPenalties. Unless otherwise provided in this chapter or by state statute adopted by reference, any person violating_ any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, be sentenced to a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or 90 days in jail. �- - - - - -1AN IRWIN NMI -2- Packet Pg. 151 6.4.a Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. -3- Packet Pg. 152 6.4.a APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: JEFFREY B. TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 153 6.4.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 5.21 (MISUSE OF THE 911 OR EMERGENCY CALL SYSTEM) TO CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF "MISUSE" AND TO AMEND THE PENALTY PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2016. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY -5- Packet Pg. 154 6.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Discussion of Draft Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05 to Add Certain Penalty Provisions Relating to Animal Bites (5 min.) Staff Lead: Jim Lawless Department: Police Services Preparer: James Lawless Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Staff recommends and requests that this draft ordinance be carried forward to the June 21, 2016 Council Business Meeting for adoption by full Council via Consent Agenda. Narrative Edmonds City Code 5.05.040 (Animal bites to be reported) has been in effect since 2004. In its current form, there is a requirement to "promptly" report animal bites to animal control. This amendment would require the reporting of animal bites within twenty-four (24) hours by any owner or person having control over said animal. The ordinance in its current form has no provision for any penalty should an animal bite go unreported. In the past, there have been several examples of animal bites occurring and the owner or person having control over the animal reporting the bite, e.g. fleeing the scene. This causes great hardship to the person having been bitten as there is no information on the immunization status of the animal, often requiring additional medical treatment beyond simply treating the bite itself. There have also been examples of animals causing significant injury to the victim, with the owner fleeing the scene and not taking responsibility for the incident. One particular, high -profile, incident occurred on August 19, 2015 where a child was attacked by a dog and the owner fled. It was only after a significant investigation by the animal control unit, with the assistance of the detective unit, as well as a press release that included the suspect's photograph, that the suspect was ultimately identified. The amendments to this ordinance would also make it a crime (misdemeanor) for failing to report an animal bite as required. This ordinance have been prepared and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. Attachments: FINAL Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05 to add Penalty Provisions 5.12.16 Packet Pg. 155 6.5.a [1 '71 M141 A [$I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 5.05 (ANIMAL CONTROL) TO ADD CERTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS RELATING TO ANIMAL BITES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has determined that there is a need for certain penalty provisions in the City of Edmonds' Animal Control regulations, ECC 5.05, relating to animal bites; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds wishes to revise ECC 5.05 to add such penalty provisions as recommended by City staff; NOW, THEREFORE, AS FOLLOWS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN Section 1. Subsection .040 of ECC 5.05 Animal Control is hereby amended to read as follows (new text in underline, deleted text in strike -through): 5.05.040 Animal bites to be reported. A. Every animal which bites a person shall, within twenty-four (24) hours, be prompt!!,; reported by any owner or person having Charge of said animal to the animal control authority and shall thereupon be securely quarantined at the direction of the animal control authority for a period of 10 days. At the discretion of the animal control authority, such quarantine may be on the premises of the owner, at the shelter designated as the city's animal shelter or, at the owner's option and expense, in a veterinary hospital of the owner's choice. When an animal's owner is unknown, such quarantine shall be at the shelter designated as a city animal shelter or at a veterinary hospital. B. Any owner or person having charge of any animal who fails to report an animal bite as required herein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, be sentenced to a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or 90 days in jail. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or -1- Packet Pg. 156 6.5.a unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: :1 JEFFREY B. TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING -2- Packet Pg. 157 6.5.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 5.05 (ANIMAL CONTROL) TO ADD CERTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS RELATING TO ANIMAL BITES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2016. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY -3- Packet Pg. 158 6.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Discussion of Draft Ordinance Amending ECC 8.32 to Add Inattentive Driving Section (5 min.) Staff Lead: Jim Lawless Department: Police Services Preparer: James Lawless N/A Staff recommends and requests that this draft ordinance be carried forward to the June 21, 2016 Council Business Meeting for adoption by full Council via Consent Agenda. Washington State no long has an RCW entitled "Failure to Use Due Care/Caution" as it was struck down as being Constitutionally vague. This has limited the option for officers when dealing with certain driving offenses and/or collision investigations. Often times, the only current option is to cite the offending driver for Negligent Driving 2nd Degree, which carries a penalty of $550 as opposed to a rules of the road violation where the infraction penalty is $136 in non -collision situations and $187 when the infraction results in a collision. This issue is particularly of concern in those situations where officers are investigating collisions that occur in parking lots (a regular occurrence) and not on a roadway. State law does not always allow for a driver to be cited in a parking lot (private property) in the same manner in which they can on a public roadway, even when the same offense has been committed. In addition to the above scenario, there are often times where drivers are using wireless communications devices or hand-held mobile telephones while driving. As the current RCW (46.61.667 & 46.61.668) is written, so long as the person is not texting or talking with the phone being held to their ear, they cannot be cited, no matter how unsafe the driving is. This includes individuals using mapping, searching and reading applications on their devices. Many jurisdictions have adopted ordinances to address these issues and entitled them Inattentive Driving. Once such jurisdiction is the City of Lynnwood, and utilizing their ordinance as a model, the City Attorney's Office has prepared a draft ordinance the would amend ECC 8.32, adding an Inattentive Driving Section. The goal is to promulgate an ordinance that would allow the officers to cite an offending driver, when appropriate, without having to cite under such a penalty heavy RCW (Negligent Driving). The officer would also be able to address unsafe driving when necessary and now cite, where the current RCW does not adequately address these issues. This ordinance has been prepared and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. Attachments: Packet Pg. 159 s.s FINAL Ordinance Amending ECC 8.32 to Add Inattentive Driving Section 5.12.16 Packet Pg. 160 6.6.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 8.32 TO ADD AN "INATTENTIVE DRIVING" PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after review and discussion, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate to amend Chapter 8.32 of the Edmonds City Code (`BCC") to add an "inattentive driving" provision; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following subsection .015 shall be added to Section 8.32 of the ECC Miscellaneous Driving and Traffic Rules: 8.32.015 Inattentive Driving. A. It shall be unlawful to drive a motor vehicle on any street, alley or way open to the public of the city of Edmonds in an inattentive manner. B. For the purposes of this section, "inattentive manner" means the operation of a motor vehicle in a manner that evidences a lack of: (1) that degree of attentiveness required to safely operate the vehicle under prevailing conditions, including, but not limited to, the nature and conditions of the roadway, the presence of pedestrians, or the presence of other traffic; or (2) that degree of attentiveness as will allow the driver of a motor vehicle to observe anything resting on or traveling on the road in time to take appropriate action as circumstances require. C. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall have committed a traffic infraction, punishable as an unscheduled infraction pursuant to Infraction Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (IRLJ) Rule 6.2(b), plus all statutory assessments. Packet Pg. 161 6.6.a Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being legislative in nature and an exercise of a power delegated to the City as a corporate entity, is subject to initiative or referendum, and shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. /.\»:Z6]LTA9103 MAYOR, DAVID O. EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 162 6.6.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 8.32 TO ADD AN "INATTENTIVE DRIVING" PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 52016. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 163 6.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Presentation of bid results for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection Improvements Project (15 min.) Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Rob English Background/History Staff Recommendation Reject all construction bids received for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection Improvements Project and place this item on the June 21st City Council meeting for action. Narrative On June 9, 2016, the City received two construction bids for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection Improvements project. Trimaxx Construction submitted the apparent low bid of $5,116,721 to complete the project. The bid is approximately $1.27M over the engineer's estimate of $3,841,297. City staff will review the bid results and possible funding strategies to move forward with re -advertising the project in early 2017. Packet Pg. 164 6.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Presentation of a Supplemental Agreement with KPG for the 236th St. SW Walkway project. (10 min.) Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On May 20, 2014, Council authorized Mayor to sign an agreement with KPG for design of walkway improvements on 236th St SW. Staff Recommendation Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at a future Council meeting. Narrative On December 4, 2014, a contract was executed with KPG for the design of the 236th St SW Walkway improvements. The total amount payable for this contract was $65,944.85. On December 31, 2015, this contract expired with only $53,741.54 having been expended. In early 2016, City staff identified a need to widen 236th St SW by 2 feet to create a safer corridor for both motorized and non -motorized users. On March 7, 2016, a new contract was executed with KPG with a total amount payable of $40,752.41. The scope of this contract included design services necessary to complete the sidewalk project, services for engineering support during the bidding phase and additional design services for the widening and overlay of 236th St SW. At the time, the project was expected to bid out in late spring of 2016 and go to construction in early summer. On May 18, 2016, City staff met with the Edmonds School District after they raised concerns about their plans to build new school buildings and site improvements at Madrona School. During this meeting, the District confirmed it did not want the City's project to build sidewalk, as proposed in 2014, on District property. The change in the District's position centered on the new site plan and the determination that this segment of sidewalk would be demolished during construction of the new school. The District also raised concerns about the possibility of existing trees being damaged or lost, if the City's portion of sidewalk was built. During the ensuing weeks, City staff, KPG and the District have worked together to develop an alternate alignment that is acceptable to the School District and satisfies the requirements of the Safe Routes to School grant that the City won for the 236th St SW project. The alignment has been designed and City staff is working with the various agencies involved with the project in hopes of bidding the project in time for construction in late summer, 2016. Before construction begins, a supplemental agreement with KPG must be executed in order to secure Packet Pg. 165 6.8 their services for engineering support during construction. The City has negotiated a consultant fee of $14,972.67 for these services. The key tasks within the scope of work include on -call construction engineering, development of a record of materials, submittal reviews, RFI's and development of record drawings. Attachments: KPG Scope of Work KPG Fee Schedule Packet Pg. 166 6.8.a Exhibit A-1 City of Edmonds Madrona Elementary Walkway Project Supplement No. 3 Construction Engineering Support Scope of work May 18, 2016 This supplement is provided to provide on -call engineering support during construction of the Madrona Elementary Walkway Project. Task 9: On call Construction Engineering The Consultant shall provide on -call Construction Engineering support services for the Madrona Elementary Walkway Project. All effort on this project will be as requested by the City. It is anticipated that budgets between Tasks will be adjusted as required to provide the requested services. The Consultant shall provide notification and receive written approval prior to exceeding the approved total project budget. The scope of services and associated cost of services (Exhibit B-3) are based upon the assumptions outlined below. A. The Consultant shall provide project management of consultant staff and prepare progress reports to be included with the monthly invoices. B. The Consultant shall prepare the Record of Materials (ROM) for use by City staff during construction. C. Prepare for and attend pre -construction conference with the City, Contractor, and affected utilities. Meeting arrangements will be by the City. D. The Consultant shall provide the on -call field support to the City inspector for the duration of construction. The level of effort for field support time is estimated at 4 site visits. E. The Consultant shall review material submittals and RFI's provided by the Contractor as requested by the City. Submittals pertaining to contractor means, methods, and sequencing (traffic control, erosion control, etc.) will be reviewed by the City. F. The Consultant shall review change conditions as they arise and make recommendation to the City for field changes/change orders. G. Prepare Record Drawings for the Madrona Elementary Walkway Project based on redline drawings provided by the City. Deliverables: Items to be provided by the Consultant: • Record of Materials (ROM) • Documentation from site meetings, change conditions, and field directives. • Change orders, if required. • Full size Record Drawing .pdf Packet Pg. 167 6.8.b :KIIIIZYa►lea a=1*191iyuAr= Project: City of Edmonds Madrona Elementary Walkway Project Supplement 3 - Construction Engineering Support May 18, 2016 EXHIBIT B-3 KPG ♦ Architecture Landscape Architecture ♦ Civil Engineering Senior Project Task Description Engineer Manager $ 64.90 $ 56.56 Labor Hour Estimate Total Fee Proj Engr ien. Urb De �roj. Surveyo $ 40.13 Design engr Landscape Survey Surveyor crew $ 34.62 $ 50.65 Technician $ 28.85 Clerical $ 21.63 Hours Direct Labor Cost Overhead 131.49% Profit Effective multiplier 30% 2.6149 Work Element 10 - On call Construction Engineering A. Project Management and Coordination 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 216 284 65 $ 565.66 B. Prepare ROM 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 10 434 571 130 $ 1,135.18 C. Prepare for and attend pre con meeting 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 6 274 360 82 $ 715.49 B. On call field support 2 4 12 4 0 0 0 22 976 1,283 293 $ 2,552.19 C. Submittal Review / RFI responses 2 8 24 0 0 4 4 42 1,747 2,297 524 $ 4,568.75 B. Field reviews/change orders 2 4 8 0 0 4 0 18 792 1,042 238 $ 2,072.15 C. Prepare Record Drawings 0 4 8 4 0 16 2 34 1,191 1,565 357 $ 3,113.25 B. Reimbursable Expenses Mileage $ 150.00 Reproduction $ 100.00 Task Totals 8 24 64 8 0 24 10 138 2,684 3,529 805 $ 14,972.67 TOTAL HOURS AND ESTIMATED FEE 8 24 64 8 0 24 10 138 2684 3529 805 $14,972.67 City of Edmonds Page 1 of 1 KPG 6/9/2016 Packet Pg. 168 6.9 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Repeal ECC 10.5 Dissolving Library Board (10 min.) Staff Lead: Hite Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Carrie Hite Background/History In 2015, Council set a goal to review and analyze the Boards and Commissions that work in an advisory capacity to the City Council. Council discussed this several times in 2015. One of the Mayor's recommendations that the Council considered was to disband the library board. Council discussed again at the Council retreat in 2016 and asked staff to bring back an ordinance dissolving the Library Board. Staff Recommendation Forward to consent agenda for approval. Narrative The Library Board was originally formed before the Edmonds Library became part of the Sno-Isle Library System. Its mission was to advise the Mayor and City council on the policies, rules, and regulations of the use of the library and its facilities; and the budget, administration, and scope of services provided by the library. Since formally becoming part of the Sno-Isle system several years ago, all of those regulatory functions are managed directly by the Sno-Isle system and its library board. The Edmonds Library Board is now largely symbolic advocacy group and has no clear charter or authority. Although all of the board members are passionate about the importance of the library and its services, the board recognizes that the advocacy role is already filled by the Edmonds Friends of the Library. The Library Board supports the Mayor's recommendation to dissolve the board at this time. Attachments: 2016-06-07 Edmonds library board ordinance lettertocitycou nci I_12-2015_rev Packet Pg. 169 6.9.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE AND DISSOLVING THE CITY'S PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds annexed to the Sno-Isle Library District in 2001; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has a public library board that advises the mayor and city council at least annually; and WHEREAS, the 2001 Library Annexation Agreement specifically references the existence of the city's public library board in Section 7; and WHEREAS, the district is able to effectively operate and manage the library without the advice of the city's public library board; and WHEREAS, both the mayor and the city's public library board are recommending that the board be dissolved and that the code sections related to the board be repealed; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 10.50 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Public Library Board," is hereby repealed and the city's public library board is hereby dissolved. Section 2. The city's 2001 Library Annexation Agreement with the Sno-Isle Regional Library District should be amended to reflect the board's dissolution. Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Packet Pg. 170 6.9.a Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 171 6.9.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE AND DISSOLVING THE CITY'S PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2016. 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 3 CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 172 6.9.b T']Im E. Healy901 Bell St., Edmonds, WA 98020 Home: 425-673-7187 Cell: 425-971-5482 E-mail: Tim.Healy@edmondswa.gov December 17, 2015 Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Edmonds City Council City Hall 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Mayor's recommendation to the Edmonds City Council to "De -formalize or disband the Library Board" Dear Council President Fraley-Monillas and members of the Edmond City Council: At the December 7, 2015 meeting of the Edmonds Library Board, the board discussed a recommendation by Edmonds Mayor Dave Earling to de -formalize or disband the library board as part of an effort to reduce costs associated with the large number of city sponsored boards and commissions. After extensive debate and discussion, the board voted four to one to support the Mayor's recommendation to disband the library board. The board was originally formed before the Edmonds Library became part of the Sno-Isle Library System. Its mission was to advise the Mayor and City council on the policies, rules, and regulations of the use of the library and its facilities; and the budget, administration, and scope of services provided by the library. Since formally becoming part of the Sno-Isle system several years ago, all of those regulatory functions are managed directly by the Sno-Isle system and its library board. The Edmonds Library Board is now largely symbolic advocacy group and has no clear charter or authority. Although all of the board members are passionate about the importance of the library and its services, we recognize that the advocacy role is already filled by the Edmonds Friends of the Library. We believe the resources currently used to staff and administer the Edmonds Library Board would be best allocated to other boards or commissions with a clear mandate to truly advise the Mayor and City Council. So on behalf of myself and board members Joyce Hudemann, Joanne Peterson, and Susan Schalla, I respectfully ask that the Edmonds City Council accept the Mayor's recommendation to disband the Edmonds Library Board. Sincerely, Tim E. Healy Edmonds Library Board Packet Pg. 173 6.10 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 Edmonds City Code Chapter 10.95 - Citizens' Tree Board (15 min.) Staff Lead: N/A Department: City Council Preparer: Sandy Chase Background/History In 2010, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 3807 establishing the Citizens' Tree Board. Staff Recommendation None Narrative The Citizens' Tree Board Chair has the ability to specify the board's own meeting time and place. In addition, the code currently specifies that the annual report is required in December. Below are excerpts from the original code and suggested new language after reviewing the code with the current Tree Board Members: 10.95.020 Officers of board - Meetings - Forum. ...The regular public meeting of the board shall be held at such time or place as may be determined by the chair or a majority of the members of the board. [Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010]. SUGGESTION: The language could be changed to: The Edmonds Tree Board shall meet on the first Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. at such locations as it shall establish throughout the city of Edmonds. NOTE: This language is consistent with some other commissions (Sister City) but the original language is also consistent with other commissions (Cemetery Board). 10.95.030 Powers and duties. SUGGESTIONS: A. The board is empowered to advise and make recommendations to the mayor and city council and, as appropriate, to the planning board and other boards or commissions of the city on such matters including but not limited to: 1. ^^velepiRg a The board may assist in developing a tree ordinance or an Urban Forest Management Program designed to help preserve and protect existing trees, encourage planting of additional trees, safeguard trees on parcels where construction or renovation is occurring or planned to occur, and encouraging the Edmonds citizenry to become active stewards of the urban forest. Packet Pg. 174 6.10 2. Increasing community outreach and education regarding the value of trees, proper selection of trees, and correct methods for planting of and caring for trees. 3. Working with civic, religious, and citizen groups to organize invasive plant removal and native vegetation planting in accord with the department of parks, recreation and cultural services. 4. Coordinating with other citizen groups to specific projects. 5. Facilitating relevant grant applications supporting ecology and watershed protection projects. 6. Sponsoring an annual Arbor Day Event. 7. Working towards achieving and maintaining a ement P Tree City USA° status. 10.95.030 B. The board shall provide an annual report to the city council within the first quarter+R Der -ember of each year. [Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010]. NOTES for SUGGESTIONS: 10.95.030.1: The board is neither the administration nor Council and therefore should not have any power to develop code. 10.95.030.7: The City has achieved the Tree City USA status and the board should now attempt at maintaining this prestigious designation. 10.95.030 B: Given the nature of December City Council Meeting schedules and the Tree Board's past annual reports not occurring in December, this language is more acceptable. Packet Pg. 175