2016-06-21 City Council - Full Agenda-17091.
2.
3.
4.
5
6
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
J U N E 21, 2016, 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 5, 2016
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 14, 2016
3. Acknowledge receipt of two Claims for Damages from Catharine Grace Andry (amounts
undetermined).
4. Approval of Claim Checks
5. Title 19 Building and Fire Code Updates
6. Change Order with Razz Construction, Inc. for the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project
7. Ordinance Amending ECC 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System) to Clarify the
Definition of Misuse and to Amend the Penalty Provisions
8. Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05 to Add Certain Penalty Provisions Relating to Animal Bites
9. Ordinance Amending ECC 8.32 to Add Inattentive Driving Section
10. Bid results for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection Improvements Project
11. Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with KPG for the 236th St. SW
Walkway project.
12. Repeal ECC 10.5 Dissolving Library Board
13. Ordinance Amending Edmonds City Code Chapter 10.95 - Citizens' Tree Board
PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
1. Commendation to Honor Sandy Chase for Her Years of Service to the City of Edmonds (10 Min.)
AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON
THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. ACTION ITEMS
8
9
1. Closed record review and action on the Planning Board's recommendation to approve a City -
sponsored rezone of 21802 98th Ave. W from Open Space (OS) to Single Family Residential (RS-8) in
File No. PLN20160019. (15 min.)
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Agenda
June 21, 2016
Page 1
10. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(1)
11. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION.
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
June 21, 2016
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 5, 2016
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
Cm040516 spec mtg
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
April 5, 2016
The City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the
Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The Council then convened in the Jury
Meeting Room.
Elected Officials Present
Kristiana Johnson, Council President
Mike Nelson, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Tom Mesaros, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Mayor Earling
Others Present
Scott Passey, City Clerk
1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING REAL ESTATE PER RCW
42.30.110.1(B) AND PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(I).
The City Council adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to discuss real estate per RCW
42.30.110(1)(b) and pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).
2. CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS FOR CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
At approximately 6:45 p.m., the Council met with Vivian Olson, a candidate for confirmation to
the Citizens' Tree Board, to discuss her desire and qualifications to serve on the Board.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 5, 2016
Page 1
Packet Pg. 4
4.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 14, 2016
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
06-14-2016 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 5
4.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
June 14, 2016
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Kristiana Johnson, Council President
Michael Nelson, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir.
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr.
Rosa Fruehling-Watson, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Andrew Price, Legislative/Council Assistant
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Mayor Earling read the following statement: Our thoughts and support go out to the families of the
victims of the tragic massacre in Orlando as well as the people of Orlando as they come together as a
community to survive this affront to human rights and dignity.
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:17 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of
Councilmember Tibbott.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Council President Johnson requested the addition of an Emergency Resolution regarding the City Park
Fire as Item 7.A.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO REVISE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016 TO
INDICATE MAYOR EARLING WAS NOT PRESENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 1
Packet Pg. 6
4.2.a
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Farrell Fleming, Executive Director, Edmonds Senior Center, invited the Council and the community
to an open house on Wednesday, June 22 from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. at the Senior Center, the first in a series
of community forums and presentations to gather public input on the plan to build a new multi -
generational activity center on the senior center site. The open house will include a brief presentation at
6:00 p.m. by the architects, Environmental Works, who are designing the building, the landscape architect
who is designing the beach restoration project and new walkway, and the environmental consultant,
Herrera Environmental Consultants. The latest conceptual drawings will be on display, similar to those
presented to the Council at their March 4 retreat, and refined after input from the Building Committee and
City staff. The goal for the evening is public input; they will be in a listening mode. Many staff, board and
committee members will assist in the process which will be largely low tech. The intent is gather input on
a one-to-one basis or very small groups. There will also be the ability to email thoughts, suggestions and
questions. They are interested in obtaining input in three general areas, 1) the building, 2) the beach
restoration, and 3) the environmental impact and sustainability of the project. Sustainable Edmonds may
co -host the event and have been part of planning the event. One of the hopes for the Edmonds Waterfront
Center is it becomes the obvious location of environmental programs, classes, and presentations; the
location demands this be a key focus of the new center.
6. STUDY ITEMS
1. STUDENTS SAVING SALMON PRESENTATION
Rondi Nordal, President, Edmonds-Woodway High School Students Saving Salmon Club, introduced
club members who were present: Afua Tiwaa, Fatima Fatty, Pavi Chance, Lindsey Barnes, Arisbeth
Acosta, Justin Heckt, and Sam Kleven. She thanked the Council for the opportunity to present and for
their support of the Edmonds Stream Team. Further details are available in the report in the Council
packet. The presenters are all student volunteers participating in the Citizen Science Program through the
Club; their project is to evaluate the water quality of the watersheds in Edmonds. This presentation is a
follow-up to the October presentation and she hoped to continue making periodic updates to the Council
on the water quality in Edmonds, perhaps every six months.
Pavi Chance explained the purpose of the project is to monitor water quality and environmental health as
the state does not have the means to monitor every stream, citizen scientists are stepping in. They also
seek to identify areas of improvement, identify what is being done right and what can be improved and
provide data to be used by other organizations. Ultimately they seek to protect salmon in stream Shell
Creek as well as bring them back to other creeks. Due to a high pre -spawn mortality in Coho salmon in
streams that fall within the State parameters for healthy water, they are also seeking to identify if there is
something else happening. They test for a number of parameters important to salmon health including
dissolved oxygen which fish need to breathe, temperatures because cooler temperatures are better for
salmon and hold more dissolved oxygen, nitrates because high levels cause algae blooms which deplete
the water of dissolved oxygen, and pH which acts as an indicator of rain.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 2
Packet Pg. 7
4.2.a
Lindsey Barnes displayed a map of 14 monitoring sites in the Marsh and upper and lower ends of creeks
in Edmonds. Four teams of two to four students are responsible for four sites each. They monitor Willow
Creek, Shell Creek, Shellabarger Creek and Edmonds Marsh and test the water quality once a month
using a high quality multi -parameter instrument. Other environmental data is collected and recorded on a
standardized form and entered into a publicly available database. Seven parameters are monitored using
an electronic meter, water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, oxygen saturation, conductivity, specific
conductance, total dissolved solids, salinity and nitrates. Measured temperatures were evaluated against
the Washington water quality standards which sets aquatic life standards at 63.7 F for salmon. Dissolved
oxygen standards are 8 mg/L for salmon spawning and pH standards are 6.5-8.5. Water temperature,
dissolved oxygen and pH were evaluated to determine whether the measurements were within the
Washington water quality standards. When monitoring streams, water samples were collected in the fall,
winter and spring from each site and delivered to a laboratory for testing for heavy metals and petroleum
product. Quarterly samples are collected and tested for fecal coliform analysis at the City's wastewater
treatment plant. The samples were also analyzed for coliform bacteria at North Seattle Community
College.
Arisbeth Acosta reported the three creeks exhibited an expected trend of decreasing temperature in the
fall with winter lows and increases in spring. She reported on:
Water temperature
o Average: 51.6 F
o High: 56.8 F
o Low: 45.6 F
o All creeks below 60.8 F
o All creeks appear good condition
o Data does not include summer months, will need to be reassessed in the fall
Dissolved oxygen
o Levels at or below 2 mg/L are lethal to most fish
o Colder water holds more dissolved oxygen
o Average: 10.5 mg/L
o Range: 9.3 mg/L to 12.5 mg/L
o All observed levels above the lowest one -day minimum of 8.0 mg/L set forth in Washington
standards
o Salmon eggs in a steam will do best in dissolved oxygen levels of 11.4 mg/L
o All three creeks are in good condition related to dissolved oxygen
pH Levels
o Measured on scale 0-14
0 7 = neutral, below 7 acidic
o pH in all three creeks generally stated constant
o Average: 7.71 with range between 6.97 to 8.22
o Decline in pH in December and March due to rain which is more acidic than stream water
o All observed pH levels in creeks within pH of 6.5 to 8.5
■ Suitable for salmon
■ Within Washington state standards
o All three creeks in good condition related to pH
Ms. Nordal explained as Shell Creek is the only creek tested that contains spawning salmon, it is held to
higher standards during the winter months, stricter than the WAC because it specifies a minimum of 11
mg/L of dissolved oxygen versus 8 mg/L. Salmon eggs are highly vulnerable and require more dissolved
oxygen. Shell Creek meets these requirements, likely the reason it can successful support salmon. She
noted one area of Shell Creek does not meet this standard but salmon do not currently reach that site.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 3
Packet Pg. 8
4.2.a
Ms. Chance provided information specific to Shellabarger Creek and Willow Creek, advising both fell
within the water quality parameters of the State. Both streams influence the Marsh equally and while
neither contain salmon, they drain into the Marsh so their water quality is important.
• Shellabarger Creek
o Higher dissolved oxygen level in the upper middle fork
• Willow Creek
o Higher dissolved oxygen level throughout
Justin Heckt presented information regarding the Edmonds Marsh:
• Water temperature
o Below 60.8 F except during May
• pH
o Edges more acidic, average 6.6
o Main inflow average 7.3
o Within Washington standards 6.5 to 8.5 except one near Harbor Square of 6.4
• Dissolved oxygen
o Main inflow average 9.4 mg/L
o Edges average: 1.8 mg/L except in March
■ Edges do not have as much inflow and subject to standing water and/or decaying matter
• Salinity
o Marsh is affected by tidegate which prevents saltwater entry in late fall and winter
o From late fall (October 15) to late winter (mid -March) marsh salinity mirrors incoming
creeks
o Year-round saltwater entry would make the Marsh more productive environment
Afua Tiwaa reported on macroinvertebrates, explaining water testing is a great way to monitor the health
of the streams. Because a full year of monitoring has not been done, it is difficult to determine their
overall health. She reported on sampling to evaluate the number of macroinvertebrates. The bugs are
grouped into three categories, 1) pollution intolerant, 2) somewhat tolerable of pollution, 3) tolerant of
pollution. A higher presence of bugs in group 1 indicate stream health is good which was the case for the
upper portion of Shell Creek.
Ms. Chance displayed and reviewed a graph of total petroleum hydrocarbons, reporting although there
were some spikes of oil and diesel, nothing alarming. This data is limited due to the expense of lab
testing, $90/sample so it was not done often. The limited data will be used to establish a baseline for
comparison with storm events. They have been unable to collect during storm events due to strict testing
criteria. Although there are some potential areas of concern, there is not enough information to draw a
conclusion and many scientists are looking at the data relative to salmon mortality. She also displayed and
reviewed a graph regarding dissolved metals, advising there were higher zinc and iron levels, but far
below the standard and both are naturally occurring chemicals.
Ms. Nordal reported on fecal coliform, explaining samples were tested at the wastewater treatment plant.
Fecal coliform is bacteria that lives in the gut and fecal matter of warm blooded animals. There are
generally lower levels of fecal coliform although some sites, primarily lower Shellabarger Creek,
southwest corner of Shellabarger Marsh and the Edmonds Marsh outlet and eastern edge at Hwy 104
culvert had elevated levels that exceeded the standard, colonies/100 mL, the standard for contact.
Although people do not swim in the Marsh, that standard is used to determine potential health risk. They
hope to collect more data and more frequent data to identify what may be causing this or any trends.
Fatima Fatty reviewed project recommendations
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 4
Packet Pg. 9
4.2.a
• No detrimental water quality issues detected so far except for the edges of the Marsh. But need to
collect summer data, consider more intense fecal coliform collections, and collect further and
better analyze heavy metals and petroleum compounds data.
• Continued monitoring will provide annual trends and needed baseline data. Project is pursuing
collection of turbidity, phosphorous, and other data to make project more compatible with State
level monitoring program.
• Monitoring sites selected are adequate, but additional sites would be beneficial.
• Project has demonstrated that a Citizen Science project utilizing students can be successful in
collecting valid, scientific data. We have benefited from participation and will carry this
experience into college and future careers.
Sam Kleven recommended the citizens of Edmonds cooperate in preserving natural resources including
salmon that spawn in lower Shell Creek. Things citizens can do include:
• Wash cars at a car wash instead of in the driveway to prevent soapy water entering storm drains
and into marine ecosystems
• Use sustainable options for law such as native grasses instead of fertilizing
• Make own compost to improve soil
• Bike more to get exercise and save gas
He commended the City for actions taken to improve Shell Creek and as a result there are still salmon in
Shell Creek. He suggested the City:
• Provide additional funding for stream -side property acquisition to better maintain environmental
conditions that directly affect streams
• Launch an effort to remove invasive species and plants
• Remove obstacles salmon face while going upstream
Ms. Nordal thanked the Council and Mayor for their support, student and adult volunteers, teachers,
school administrators, Edmonds School District, Sound Salmon Solutions, Earth Corp, grantors including
the Hubbard Foundation, Google.org and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and property owners
who allowed access to their land. She thanked the EWHS art class that is working on the On -the -Fence
mural that will be displayed during the Art Festival.
Councilmember Mesaros thanked the students and their supporters. He asked if the students had found
any comparative data. Ms. Nordal answered they have been working with data they have collected and
State standards. Joe Scordino said the purpose of initiating this program was the lack of data.
Councilmember Mesaros referred to the amount of fecal matter in the Marsh and asked if mammals, birds
and fish in the Marsh cause the bacteria rise. Ms. Nordal said that was a potential cause; however, due to
the incredibly high levels, there may be other sources such as people not picking up after their dogs.
Heavy rainfall also washes away more fecal matter. Some of high levels were following rain events
although the testing date that indicated levels approaching 300 colonies/100 mL was not.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked the students for volunteering their time. He observed salmon return to the
lower reaches of Shell Creek, the only creek that currently supports salmon, yet the water quality is fairly
comparable in all streams. He asked why salmon are not returning to other stream. Mr. Scordino advised
the access to Willow and Shellabarger Creeks is through the Marsh which currently drains through a
1275-foot pipe that is 40 feet below the water surface. Fish usually find a creek toward the surface and do
not typically dive down. If there are salmon in the other creeks, it is very few, primarily due to the pipe.
That will be rectified with the Willow Creek daylighting project.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 5
Packet Pg. 10
4.2.a
Councilmember Teitzel inquired about salmon in Hindley and Perrinville Creeks. Mr. Scordino answered
salmon can reach the lower reach of Hindley from Shell Creek but not far due to culverts and dropping
barriers. Ms. Nordal said the water is not very deep where Hindley enters Shell Creek and there is not
much water flow. In addition, there is a culvert several feet from where Hindley merges with Shell Creek.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised the final design for Willow Creek has been completed. She
encouraged the students to invite her on their next walkabout. She commended the students for their
report and encouraged them to make a presentation to WRIA 8.
Councilmember Nelson referred to a monitoring site the students are interested in at the south end of the
Marsh that is currently overseen by the Department of Ecology (DOE) on the Unocal property and asked
why access is not allowed. Mr. Scordino answered they would also like to know why. DOE was asked to
approach Chevron to obtain permission to go on the property and they declined. Where the students
would like to test is on the periphery of the site, away from the cleanup.
Councilmember Nelson referred to the students' inability to collect and determine summer water
temperatures and asked if higher summer temperatures would affect the viability of salmon. Ms. Nordal
answered it would depend in part on the species and the point in the lifecycle. She recalled salmon
attempting to spawn in the Columbia but due to incredibly high water temperatures, they were dying off
due to the lack of dissolved oxygen and increased susceptibility to fungal infections; lower water
temperatures create higher dissolved oxygen. She agreed higher summer water temperatures can affect
salmon spawning and lower dissolved oxygen levels could also affect eggs.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed the community's thanks for the amount of time the students
have spent on this project, recognizing it was not all done during school hours. She recognized Joe
Scordino and Val Stewart and other adult volunteers for their efforts on this project. She encouraged the
students to invite all Councilmembers on their walkabout. She was disappointed the entire presentation
was not televised due to the power outage; there is a lot interest in the Marsh and efforts of the Students
Saving Salmon.
At Council President Johnson's request, several students indicated they were graduating seniors. She
remarked this was an important final exam and a tribute to a long year of work. She thanked the students
for their dedication and their scientific expertise. She was hopeful this project would help them in their
future. She also thanked Mr. Scordino and Ms. Stewart.
Mayor Earling also thanked the students for their efforts and for their presentation.
2. PRESENTATION OF A CHANGE ORDER WITH RAZZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR
THE FISHING PIER REHABILITATION PROJECT
Public Works Director Phil Williams relayed the pier had more extensive damage internally than was
known when the project started. The original construction did not comport with the approved plans and
specifications; the top slab placed on the existing deck did not bond well which allow water and moisture
to seep in from the sides and corrode the rebar and caused the two slabs to delaminate and fall apart which
extended into the center section of the pier. A great deal of work is required to repair the damage
including cutting off 9 inches on the outside, pouring a new section, and placing anodes in the structure to
stop the ongoing corrosion. The total cost to complete the additional work is $429,100, after some
significant deducts, the actual increase in the construction contract is $227,000.
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite referred to the budget in the packet that reflects the current
funding sources and expenses; with the change order, the total cost of the project is $1.692 million. In
discussion with the State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), because the City's grant request
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 6
Packet Pg. 11
4.2.a
score very well two years ago, the project was still on the Water Access Funds' radar. The City received a
direct appropriation for the pier from the legislature and after requesting additional funds for the project
due to the significant damage, RCO agreed to provide $450,000 if Washington Department of Fish &
Wildlife (WDFW) provided $50,000 which WDFW did. Additional funds, $207,000, are included in the
budget for a management reserve to address any other issues that may arise. The management reserve is
more than 10% but it is a reimbursable contract, if the funds are not spent, they are not billed or
reimbursed. The contractor has provided a schedule; the opening day is approximately August 16. She
requested the Council approve the $1.9 million budget and the $227,078 change order.
Council President Johnson asked when a decision will be made to take over the pier from the State. Ms.
Hite answered in previous discussions with the Council and Mayor, they wanted to wait until the capital
repairs were complete before entering into that discussion. Discussion with the Council regarding transfer
of ownership will begin as soon as the pier opens. The City has an Interlocal Agreement with WDFW
because they own the pier and the City is managing the construction contract; staff will return to Council
in the next 1-2 weeks to ask for authorization to amend the contract and add the funding and the new
scope of work.
Councilmember Buckshnis complimented Ms. Hite for finding the additional funds.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL,
TO 1) INCREASE THE TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET TO $1,900,000, AND 2) AUTHORIZE THE
MAYOR TO SIGN A CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER FOR $227,078 TO COMPLETE
ADDITIONAL REPAIR WORK.
Council President Johnson said staff s recommendation was to forward this to the June 21 Consent
Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF
THE SECOND
Councilmember Teitzel asked if all the damage had been discovered or was there a possibility more
would be uncovered. Mr. Williams answered the designers are confident if the edge repairs are made, the
anodes will stop any ongoing corrosion in any part of the structure. With those repairs, the structural
engineers' opinion is the pier will be good for another 40 years.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to a deduct for the galvanized guard rails, light poles and the
trestle railings and asked why those were deducted. Ms. Hite answered it was due to savings identified by
the contractor.
Mayor Earling thanked the department heads for their quick work. Ms. Hite was in Olympia for another
reason and returned with a considerable amount of funding. The Engineering Department has also worked
quickly on this project. Ms. Hite relayed the State RCO is stellar to work with; they made the magic
happen by identifying and allocating funds to Edmonds for the fishing pier.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the June 21 Consent Agenda.
3. PRESENTATION ON THE STORMWATER CODE UPDATE
Public Works Director Williams explained in the past Jerry Shuster would have been making this
presentation; he left the City to work for Bellevue and a suitable replacement is being recruited. He
introduced Craig Dubberstein, CPD Solutions, a subcontractor to Herrera with whom the City has
contracted due to their expertise in rewriting the stormwater section, Chapter 18.30. Coordinating with
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 7
Packet Pg. 12
4.2.a
this effort, the rest of the development code is also being reviewed for necessary additions and changes
that will incorporate LID principles into preliminary work. Tonight's presentation is focused on Chapter
18.30. He also introduced Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager. These are significant
changes to the code including the way people apply, information required for the application, the amount
of outside expertise needed to prepare the application as well as staff time review. It is good for surface
streams both water quality and channel security and integrity as well as for Puget Sound. The only down
side is it will require more work and expense.
Mr. Dubberstein reviewed the history of the City's stormwater code:
• 1977:
First Code
• 1980:
Code Revised
• 1995:
Code Revised
• 2009:
Code Rewritten
• 4/20/2010:
Current Version Adopted
He reviewed drivers for 2016 Code Revisions
2013-2018 Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Permit)
2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Ecology's Manual)
(Essentially identical requirements for 87 "NPDES Phase 11" municipalities across western
Washington) 3
Mr. Dubberstein provided an overview of the permit requirements:
• S5.C.4.a - Controlling Runoff from New Development, Redevelopment and Construction Sites
• Implement an ordinance or other enforceable mechanism that addresses runoff from new
development, redevelopment, and construction site projects. The ordinance or other enforceable
mechanism shall include, at a minimum, the Minimum Requirements, thresholds, and definitions
in Appendix 1 [of the NPDES Permit] or a program approved by Ecology under the 2013 NPDES
Phase I Municipal Stormwater Permit, for new development, redevelopment, and construction
sites.
• The local requirements shall include site planning, Best Management Practice (BMP) selection
and design, and BMP infeasibility criteria.
• The program shall include a permitting process with site plan review, inspection and enforcement
capability to meet the standards listed, for both private and public projects. The program shall
include provisions to verify adequate long-term operation and maintenance of stormwater
treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities that are permitted and constructed pursuant to the
above. These provisions shall be in place no later than December 31, 2016.
• Most substantial change has to do with new Low Impact Development requirements (Permit
"Minimum Requirement #5")
o Affects small projects (>2,000 sq. ft. of impervious)
o More complex site assessment requirements
o Additional City review requirements
He provided an overview of Chapter 18.30 revisions:
Code Section
ExistinglProposed Section Titles
18.30.00
Purposes
18.30.010
Definitions
18.30.020
Authority and Regulation
18.30.030
Applicability
18.30.040
Administfation Exemptions
18.30.050
Administration
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 8
Packet Pg. 13
4.2.a
18.30.060
Requirements
18.30.070
£xemptieffs, Exceptions, Adjustments and Appeal
18.30.080
Ease e ffts, �, Access and Covenants
18.30.090
Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities
18.30.100
Enforcement Rules
18.30.110
Notice and Hearing on Adoption of Rules
18.30.120
Rules to be Filed
He reviewed notable proposed code revisions:
• Definitions— (Ch. 18.30.010)
o Revising 28 terms to be consistent with the latest NPDES permit definitions, as well as for
consistency with general stormwater practices.
o Adding 28 new terms to be consistent with the latest NPDES permit definitions, and for
clarity of new or changed code requirements. (E.g., "bioretention" and "hard surface")
o Deleting 9 terms no longer used in the revised code, or defined in other code sections. (E.g.,
"critical area" and "variance")
• Authority & Regulations (Ch. 18.30.020)
A. Clarifying that the Director has authority to enforce the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum.
B. Adding — Statement that the requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements.
C. Adding — That the Director shall have the authority to impose additional requirements.
D. Adding — Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the
requirements of any other laws.
E. Adding — Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all
impacts to the environment
• Stormwater management requirements (Ch. 18.30.060)
o Adopting by reference:
1. Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, Appendix 1, modification
date January 16, 2015
2. Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, 2014
3. The Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (in development)
Substantial changes to 18.30.060 for equivalency with Ecology's requirements in the 2013-
2018 NPDES Phase 11 permit and 2014 Manual (see subsequent slides).
• Stormwater management requirements (Ch. 18.30.060)
o New connections to the City's system:
1. Specific to sites that do not meet the definition of new or redevelopment (i.e., no
development activity)
2. May be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval.
3. For sites > 2,000 sq. ft. of impervious area, requirements associated with stormwater flow
control and/or water quality treatment may be required if the drainage poses a risk/threat
to downstream systems/properties.
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
o Folding in old Min. Req. #10 — Off -site Analysis and Mitigation into Min. Req. #4, to capture
smaller projects
o Less rigorous requirements for smaller projects. "Qualitative" assessment of off -site issues.
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5 — On -site Stormwater Management
o Minimum Requires #1 - #5:
- > 2,000 sq. ft. new and replaced hard surface area, or
- > 7,000 sq. ft. land disturbance
o Min. Requirements #1 - #9:
- > 5,000 sq. ft. new and replaced hard surface area, or
- > 3/4 acre vegetation to lawn/landscape, or
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 9
Packet Pg. 14
4.2.a
- > 2.5 acres native vegetation to pasture
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5 (Implementation)
o Projects triggering MR #1 - #5 only
- List #1, or LID Performance Standard applies
o Projects triggering MR # 1 - #9
- List #2 or LID Performance Standard applies
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5 (List Option)
o Lawn and Landscaped Areas
1. Soil Quality and Depth
o Roofs
1. Full Dispersion or Downspout Full Infiltration
2. Rain Gardens [or Bioretention]
3. Downspout Dispersion Systems
4. Perforated Stub -out Connections
o Other hard surfaces
1. Full Dispersion
2. Permeable Pavement [or Rain Gardens or Bioretention]
3. Sheet Flow Dispersion, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion
o Consider all BMPs in the order listed and use the first BMP that is considered feasible:
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5 (LID Performance Standard Option)
o Achieved using hydraulic/hydrologic modeling (typically requires professional engineering
support)
o LID Performance Standard addresses lower, more frequent stormwater flows
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5 (Impacts to Permit Process)
o Extensive new parcel -scale BMP installations
o Generally increases developer site investigation, design, and construction level of effort
o Increases City review and inspection effort
o Improved stormwater and water quality control, dispersed among sites and close to source of
impact
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5 (Retrofitting unmanaged impervious areas)
o Existing Site
o Existing Parking Lot to Remain — Stormwater Management will need to be provided for a
minimum of 25% of the existing surface area.
o Remove Existing Structure & Replace with New Structure — Stormwater Management will
need to be provided for New Impervious Surface Area
• MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #5 (Projects not draining to City's system)
o For example, drains to BNSF system or direct to Puget Sound:
1. To off -site private property: obtain permission from owner (e.g., BNSF)
2. Direct to Puget Sound: apply subset of Min. Req. #5 List (per Ecology)
3. Manage on -site: apply Min. Req. #5 List with geotechnical analysis
4. Pump to City system: with approval, and with capacity analysis
• Access and Covenants (Ch. 18.30.080)
o Revising language for compliance with NPDES Permit:
A. Access. Proper ingress and egress shall be provided to the City for inspection. The City
shall notify the responsible party in writing of a failure to provide access.
B. Covenants. Maintenance covenants shall be required for each site/lot that will be
maintained by a private entity. The maintenance covenant shall address requirements and
responsibilities for long-term management and maintenance of the applicable BMP(s).
Mr. Dubberstein provided a summary:
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 10
Packet Pg. 15
4.2.a
• Major code revisions driven by NPDES Permit compliance. Primary change relates to low impact
development and "on -site" BMPs.
• Generally requires additional project effort, and City review effort
• Similar to over 80 similar municipalities
• Code to be "adopted and effective no later than December 31, 2016"
Schedule/Status
• July 20 — Public outreach meetings (separate meetings for developers and the public)
• July 2016 — Second City Council briefing (if significant changes to draft code)
• Aug. 2, 2016 — City Council Public Hearing
• Aug. 16, 2016 — City Council Action Item (Seeking approval of code with an effective date of Jan
1, 2017)
• Late Summer/Fall 2016 — completion of Stormwater Addendum. Development of implementation
tools (e.g., review checklists)
With regard to retrofitting, Mr. Williams explained in the current code, any retrofit that is below the
threshold (such as 2,000 square feet) would not trigger the code; as a result smaller renovations could be
done over time, none of which trigger the code on their own. This approach using 25% of the existing
impervious is an easier way. He acknowledged the changes are complicated and there will be a
tremendous need for education well beyond the meetings scheduled on July 20 including for staff.
Councilmember Mesaros referred to 18.30.060, new connections, relaying an example of a homeowner
upon realizing his renovation is approaching the 2,000 square foot level would decide not to do anything
or do a smaller project. Mr. Williams answered there is no perfect answer; regardless of what the trigger
is someone could do a project below that level and not go through this effort. He recognized that could
happen but said any significant change on a lot was likely to trigger the 2,000 square foot level. One
option would be to consider incentives. Councilmember Mesaros acknowledged there were good reasons
for the code revisions such as to control runoff; however, for a homeowner, their good intentions and
pocketbook may differ. Mr. Dubberstein said the actual cost may not be as much as the perceived cost so
education will be important. City staff will be able to explain to homeowners how to meet the
requirements with minimal effort.
Councilmember Mesaros said part of the effort needs to be educating the public that this is a great
opportunity to control runoff versus a burden. Mr. Williams said the intent is for smaller projects to have
a toolbox of preapproved solutions such as rain garden designs that do not require hiring a stormwater
engineer, etc. Ms. McConnell said it will be a similar approach to the current requirements. Simplified
tools are beneficial to residents, property owners, and developers; continuing that in the code update as
well as education will help residents and smaller projects. Mr. Williams said many people have
voluntarily done alternative stormwater designs on their property because they know it's the right thing
and there are environmental benefits. Larger developers will need to go through the process.
Councilmember Mesaros supported educating the public that this is a great opportunity for the City.
Although it seems complex, the City has a good staff to assist.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked about culverts and stormwater in areas where there will not be be any
development. Mr. Williams referred to the CIP and longer range plans that identify issues in the City's
drainage system that need to be upgraded or capacity expanded. Stormwater rates provide resources for
capital projects. The City is beginning to video the drainage system and are finding a great deal that needs
repair. The amount of investment in the future in stormwater infrastructure will be similar to investments
in water and sewer. All that infrastructure is old and need work; culverts are undersized, culverts need to
be replaced, etc. Most of that will not be done by developers or homeowners but by the City.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed this was a wonderful opportunity because the public is realizing
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 11
Packet Pg. 16
4.2.a
stormwater is killing fish and ruining streams. She asked what other agencies such as WSDOT are doing
and how can the City help them understand the importance of stormwater management. Mr. Williams said
other agencies also have to comply.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with looking at retrofitting unmanaged impervious surface and asked
how 25% was selected. Mr. Williams answered it was the weighted average of people in the room. It will
also some progress to be made on unmanaged impervious surfaces. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if
staff will provide the Council the redline version of code in advance of the next meeting. Mr. Williams
said staff will attempt to provide a comprehensive strikeout version but it will be difficult to read due to
the number of changes/additions. Mr. Dubberstein clarified it is a 25% minimum; the aim is to get people
to do more.
4. DISCUSSION OF DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC 5.21 (MISUSE OF THE 911
OR EMERGENCY CALL SYSTEM) TO CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF MISUSE AND
TO AMEND THE PENALTY PROVISIONS
Assistant Police Chief Jim Lawless said the last time the ordinance was addressed was in 1999. As the
redline version of the changes indicates, the ordinance is antiqued and not very user friendly and written
well before the proliferation of cell phones and issues with 911 calls. This is not meant to address
incidental/accidental situations such as a "pocket dial" but individuals who chronically use 911
inappropriately even after being informed of the proper procedures. As written, that activity would result
in a misdemeanor charge. He provided an example, several months ago an individual called 911 73 times
within 12-hour period. That is the type of situations this ordinance is intended to address.
Councilmember Nelson asked whether texting was addressed by this ordinance. ACOP Lawless answered
no. Councilmember Nelson asked if frequent 911 texts would cause problems. ACOP Lawless advised
text 911 is in an exploratory phase. The ordinance refers to the abuse of the 911 system and does not
specify whether it is a dialed call or text.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the graduated penalty for false alarms. This ordinance does not
refer to a graduated offense, only a fine not to exceed $1000 or 90 days in jail. She asked whether there
would be a fine for someone calling 911 who should have called the non -emergency number. ACOP
Lawless assured it was not intended to address that; the ordinance also changed the definition of abuse of
system to include "creation of public safety risk." The ordinance is not meant to address the incidental
accident such as a child calling 911 or someone calling 911 instead of the non -emergency number; it is
intended to address egregious situations. He said situations that reach the degree of the example he
provided, impact overall public safety. In consultation with the City Attorney and looking at what other
jurisdictions have done, it was decided it would be a misdemeanor due to the public safety risk.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the new non -emergency number.
Councilmember Teitzel observed the penalty was reduced from $5,000 to $1,000. ACOP Lawless said
that is the penalty phase for a misdemeanor crime. Councilmember Teitzel asked how many were
collected when the fee was $5000. ACOP Lawless answered to his knowledge nothing has ever been done
with the ordinance as written due to the difficulty of civilly suspending someone's right to use a
telephone; there was no way to enforce it.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the Consent Agenda.
5. DISCUSSION OF DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC 5.05 TO ADD CERTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS RELATING TO ANIMAL BITES
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 12
Packet Pg. 17
4.2.a
Assistant Police Chief Jim Lawless explained last summer there was a serious incident on the waterfront
where a dog attacked a child and multiple reconstructive surgeries on the child's face were required. As a
result of investigation by the animal control unit, a detective assigned to the case due to the severity of the
injuries and public outreach and press releases, the subject was identified and he eventually turned
himself in. The way the ordinance is current written, beyond the dog bite itself and running at large, there
was nothing to charge the person with. There is a requirement to report a dog bite but no penalty if that is
not done. This make it a criminal offense if the owner fails to report severe animal bite within 24 hours.
He noted 99.9% of the time, dog bites are reported, whether by the owner or the person bitten. This
ordinance is intended to address egregious situations to impose a penalty for not being a responsible
animal owner. With regard to last year's incident, the police department tried to submit charges through
the Snohomish County Prosecutor's office but it did not meet the statutory burden.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the Consent Agenda.
6. DISCUSSION OF DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC 8.32 TO ADD INATTENTIVE
DRIVING SECTION
Assistant Police Chief Jim Lawless said this ordinance has been on the back burner, hoping the State
legislature would address it. Years ago there was a statute that allowed people to be cited for failure to use
due care. It was struck down because it was statutorily vague and did not have enough specificity related
to actions and penalties. This ordinance was developed after researching neighboring jurisdictions and
working with the City Attorney. The intent is to minimize the burden on the driver; in certain cases, an
officer's only option is a stiff penalty on an infraction or a misdemeanor. This ordinance allows officers to
take necessary enforcement and lessen the burden on the person receiving the citation.
Councilmember Nelson observed the language does not mention cell phones. ACOP Lawless answered
that is addressed by an existing RCW. This ordinance is intended to address issues outside of cell phones
such as applying makeup, reading a book, anything other than paying attention to the roadway.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why not include cell phones. ACOP Lawless said there is already an
RCW and the police department is hopefully the legislature will tighten that further as having a phone up
to your ear or in front of you does not change the dynamics of the person's driving.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the Consent Agenda.
7. PRESENTATION OF BID RESULTS FOR THE 76TH AVE & 212TH ST.
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Public Works Director Phil Williams recommended rejecting all bids. He reviewed project information:
Engineer Est $3841,297
Lowest Bid (Tri Max) $5,116,721
Initial shortfall-$1,275,424
PUD Cost
-$178,500
Frontier Cost
-$271,000
Reimbursement by Comcast
$41,659
Reimbursement by Wave
$85,815
Total shortfall
$1,597,450
He highlighted differences between the engineer's estimate and the lowest bid for several items:
Engineer's
Difference
Item
Lowest Bid
Estimate
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 13
Packet Pg. 18
4.2.a
Mobilization (Scheduled A)
$114,000
$230,000
$166,000
Project Traffic Control
$60,000
$88,000
Traffic Control Supervisor
$1,000
$115,000
Pedestrian Traffic Control
$20,000
$45,000
Fla ers
$90,000
$112,000
Tree Removal
$9,000
$31,000
Remove Structures & Obstructions
$25,000
$110,000
CSBC
$32,500
$64,000
Type 1 Low Profile Curb
$2,000
$27,000
Temp Signal
$100,000
$184,000
Traffic Signal
$250,000
$460,000
$210,000
Mobilization (Schedule B)
$50,000
$100,000
Temporary Traffic Control
$20,000
$50,000
Traffic Control Supervisor
$1,000
$50,000
12" storm sewer pipe
$50,000
$99,000
16" storm sewer pipe
$25,000
$50,000
Detention vault
$200,000
$280,000
$1,049,500
$2,095,000
He said reasons for the high bid could include bidding at a difficult time of year, most contractors have
their summer work outlined. For example, Trimaxx Construction, the apparent low bidder, won a bid in
another city that was only 2% over the engineer's estimate prepared by the same engineering company.
As a result, TriMaxx's summer work was fairly well established and he was uncertain whether that
influenced this bid.
He recommended:
• Re -bid the project in December or January (better bidding climate)
• Apply for TIB grant in August 2015 (notification in November)
• If grant is successful move forward with scope as outlined
• If not successful, consider removing the undergrounding of overhead utilities (approximately
$929,000)
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented this was highway robbery. She hated to see the utilities not
be undergrounded because this is such a rare opportunity. She urged staff to do their best to get the wires
undergrounded. Mr. Williams agreed, noting people appreciated the undergrounding of utilities at Five
Corners. This intersection is not quite as high value an intersection from a view standpoint as Five
Corners but this was a one-time opportunity. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said this is a north -south-
east -west connection. Mr. Williams agreed removing the undergrounding would be a last resort.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule rejection of the bid on the June 21 Consent Agenda.
8. PRESENTATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH KPG FOR THE 236TH
ST. SW WALKWAY PROJECT
Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the City signed a contract 1'/z years ago with KPG to
design a Safe Routes to Schools sidewalk from SR-104 to Madrona School that included a connection to
the door of the school which was required in the grant. The initial contract was $69,944.85. This contract
expired on December 31, 2015 with only $53,741 expended. A second contract was negotiated and signed
on March 7, 2016 with KPG for $40,752. The higher amount is due to the City's experience on 238th with
the sidewalks and raingardens resulted in a limited amount of pavement, 10-foot lanes. That would have
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 14
Packet Pg. 19
4.2.a
also occurred at 236th leading up to the school, a location where 600 cars/day drop off and pick up
students. Width was added to the road which increases construction costs and design costs.
Before construction begins, a supplemental agreement with KPG must be executed to secure their
services for engineering support during construction. The City has negotiated a consultant fee of $14,972
for these services. Staff is also requesting a 5% management reserve.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the Consent Agenda.
9. REPEAL ECC 10.5 DISSOLVING LIBRARY BOARD
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite recalled during the 2015 retreat the Council agreed to analyze the
cost and purpose of all boards and commissions and whether they were necessary and effective. At that
time Mayor Earling recommended dissolution of the Library Board; the Library Board also recommends
dissolution. She requested this item be forwarded to the Consent Agenda.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the Consent Agenda.
10. EDMONDS CITY CODE CHAPTER 10.95 -CITIZENS' TREE BOARD
Councilmember Buckshnis highlighted changes:
• Specifying when the Tree Board will meet
• Changing language in 10.95.030.A Powers and Duties
1. Developing a The board may assist in developing a tree ordinance or an
Management Program designed to help preserve and protect existing trees, encourage
planting of additional trees, safeguard trees on parcels where construction or renovation is
occurring or planned to occur, and encouraging the Edmonds citizenry to become active
stewards of the urban forest.
7. Working towards achieving and maintaining a Hof Tree City USA® status.
• Changing language in 10.95.030.B:
o The board shall provide an annual report to the city council within the first quarter in
per of each year.
Urban Forest
Councilmember Teitzel suggested changing "or an Urban Forest Management Program" in 10.95.030 to
"and/or an Urban Forestry Management Plan." Councilmember Buckshnis said the tree ordinance and
Urban Forest Management Plan will not be done at the same time. She was agreeable to the change.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item for approval on the Consent Agenda.
7.A EMERGENCY RESOLUTION REGARDING THE CITY PARK FIRE
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained there was a fire at the City Park maintenance building
on June 8. The police consider it an arson and are actively investigating it. She displayed photographs of
the damaged storage shed, a flatbed pickup, severely burned trees behind the shed and another smaller
shed that has collapsed. The shed stores all the park maintenance products, equipment, stereo system for
4th of July, etc. Staff is developing an inventory of the contents of the shed. This is an emergency
ordinance to contract with with Belfor Restoration to remove the shed due to the safety issue it poses in
its current condition. If the Council approves the emergency ordinance, demolition could begin as soon as
tomorrow.
WCIA has assigned Evergreen Adjustment Services who were in contact the day after the fire. An
adjuster visited the site the day after the fire and took pictures; his analysis was submitted today. The
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 15
Packet Pg. 20
4.2.a
rough estimate of loss is $75,000 - $100,000 for the building and contents although the inventory has not
yet been finalized. Vehicles are handled separate from the building in the City's insurance policy. An
adjuster is coming tomorrow to assess the completely destroyed flatbed truck as well as five other
vehicles that were severely damaged from the fire's heat. The City's policy has a $25,000 deductible for
facilities, not vehicles, so some allocation will be required for rebuilding. She and Mr. Williams have
discussed reassessing the usability of the building design; the shed had a very narrow door for loading
equipment. Staff may consider rebuilding it in a slightly different configuration as well as enhancing
security at City Park. Staff will return to Council with that issue in the future.
Mr. Williams said this is the third break-in in the six years since he has been with the City. A more robust
security system with cameras would be appropriate. A $4,600 order of janitorial supplies had been placed
in the building shortly before the fire which will require an emergency order of janitorial supplies. The
emergency is to demolish the building; there is an opportunity to rethink the footprint of the building.
Councilmember Teitzel asked whether there was any potential adverse effect on the insurance claim from
not putting the contract out for bid. Ms. Hite answered no, the insurance adjuster is recommending this
process and removal of the building. The insurance adjuster also recommended Belfor who they often
work with on municipal projects. Mr. Williams said it would not need to go out for bid as it likely would
be well within the limitations of using the roster process but that takes more time than an emergency
resolution.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS,
TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 1361, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, FINDING THAT AN EMERGENCY EXISTS AND WAIVING
COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS TO ADDRESS DAMAGE
RESULTING FROM THE JUNE 8, 2016 FIRE AT CITY PARK. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling commented Flag Day is always a joyous day in Edmonds, made more dramatic today by
the wind. Contrasting that is the recent tragedy in Orlando, Florida; the flag at City Hall will be at half-
mast by presidential decree through June 16.
Mayor Earling announced the Arts Festival kickoff tomorrow night for the patrons' party and the festival
itself on Friday through Sunday. He encouraged Councilmembers to attend, noting had a peek at the
artwork on Sunday and it is stunning.
8. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Nelson commented on the events in Orlando: The victims of this tragedy are not just a
number; they came from all over and represented the very best of America. They came from Florida,
Connecticut, South Carolina, New York, Michigan, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Dominican
Republic, Venezuela, Cuba; worked at UPS, McDonald's, Starbucks, Calvin Klein, Disney World;
employed as a student financial aid counselor for veterans, an accountant in marketing, social worker,
general manager, sales associate, television producer, financial adviser, mental health counselor, several
college students, a restaurant owner, nurse, pharmacy technician, interior design student, computer
science student, a nursing student, an honor student, an aspiring sports journalist, a former US Army
captain, an actor and gospel singer, a father of three and a mother of eleven. His heart went out to the
families who lost loved ones, to those that survived and to the first responders who bore witness to this
tragedy. Words cannot express the selfishness of this attack and the anger he felt to the few who dare
threaten our way of life. To quote President Coolidge, "Little progress can be made by merely attempting
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 16
Packet Pg. 21
4.2.a
to repress what is evil. Our great hope lies in developing what is good." Councilmember Nelson's hope
was Edmonds citizens stand with those who are developing good; tolerance, not intolerance; inclusion,
not exclusion; those who love, not hate our differences.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said after spending two weeks in Mexico, she was thankful for the
United States. Despite what occurred in Orlando, she was happy to live in the United States.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked for a moment of silence for Orlando.
Council President Johnson announced open houses next week:
• Tuesday, June 21: Hazardous Mitigation Planning, 5:00 — 7:00 p.m. in the Library Plaza Room
• Wednesday, June 22: Presentation on the new Waterfront Activity Center, 7:00 — 9:00 p.m. at the
Senior Center
• Thursday, June 23: Civic Field Master Plan, 6:00 — 7:30 p.m. in the Library Plaza Room
Councilmember Teitzel echoed Councilmember Nelson's remarks and thoughts about the tragedy in
Orlando. He has had a difficult time concentrating the last two days; the events weigh heavy on his heart,
realizing what a unthinkable, horrific tragedy it would be if that happened in this community.
Recognizing there are soft targets in Edmonds including schools and the Edmonds Center for the Arts and
events like the Taste of Edmonds, he suggested local security measures be evaluated to reduce the
potential for such an incident to happen. With a heavy heart, his thoughts are with those in Orlando.
Councilmember Mesaros said before June 14 was Flag Day, it was US Army Day commemorating the
Continental Congress' creation of the United States Army in 1775. Remembering that date was one of the
qualifications for members of the Army.
Councilmember Mesaros thanked Councilmember Nelson for his comments regarding the tragedy in
Orlando. He relayed his son has visited Pulse while in Orlando for the entertainment but was glad he was
not there last Saturday night.
9. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
This item was not needed.
10. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
This item was not needed.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 14, 2016
Page 17
Packet Pg. 22
4.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Acknowledge receipt of two Claims for Damages from Catharine Grace Andry (amounts undetermined).
Staff Lead: {Type Name of Staff Lead}
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Linda Hynd
N/A
Acknowledge receipt of two Claims for Damages by minute entry.
Catharine Grace Andry
18109 WA -Highway 99
#216
Lynnwood, WA 98037
(Amounts undetermined)
Attachments:
Andry Claim for Damages 6-15-16A
Andry Claim for Damages 6-15-16B
Packet Pg. 23
4.3.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM =�5
Raee ved y C ty ED
This form complaint and the attached three supplement pages are filed on fS-I
June 15 to preserve one of Claimant's limitations periods. PLEASE SEEPAGE 5 ll ii t 11 2016
ease take note that CATHARINE GRACE ANDRY who currently resides at 18109
#216 LYNNWOOD WA 98037 , mailing address P.O. BOX 353 SEATTLE WA 98111
, home phone # 206.607.7356 , work phone # 213.985.5825 , and who resided at
SW, EDMONDS WA 98026 at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is 4-15-1970 , is claiming damages
against CITY OF EDMONDS & EPD _ in the sum of $ (SEE ATTACHMENT) arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
OFF. DEBORAH DAWSON
DATE OF OCCURRENCE: JUNE 16, 2014, ongoing TIME: STARTED 8:40 A.M.
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE:
DESCRIPTION:
8014 215TH STREET SW - EDMONDS WA 98026
Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage.
ON JUNE 16, 2014, CLAIMANT'S PET TURTLE LIMELIGHT WAS UNLAWFULLY TAKEN AND IMPOUNDED
BT EDMONDS POLICE IN VIOLATION OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE AND STATE STATUTES. THE POLICE
BEpORT IN IS STREWN VIIH EXAGGERATIONS AND FALSEHOODS. INTENDED IQ GIVE
� THE FAI SF APPEARANCE 2RQRAR1 F CAI ISE TO TAKE THE ANIMA
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers.
JAMES CASEY O'BRIEN MARLIN PHELPS RYAN PHELPSOFFICERS
R6MSEUR, BRAD PAUL EN RI HARD SMITH ACQ OFFICERSDEBORAH DAWSON AND TABATHA
withheld thusfar, pursuant to RCW § 42.56.240 (2) ).
3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? n/a Yes No
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy #:
* * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * *
License Plate #
Type Auto: —
(year) (make)
DRIVER:
Address:
Phone#:
Passengers:
Name:
Address:
Driver License #
(model)
_ OWNER:
Address:
Phone#:
Name:
Address:
Form Revised 05/06/14 r�Form
�Page
%I of 2
Packet Pg. 24
4.3.a
* * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * *
I, *CATHARINE GRACE ANDRY , being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above
described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledge that any
information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may be subject disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.
X
Signature of Claimant(s)
State of Washington
County of 5rU (.5
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that CpT#A4ff4- 4"N iO is the person who appeared before me, and said
person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned In the instrument.
Title / —O �
My appointment expires: (�
Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 5`h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Form Revised 05/06/14
Form Page 2 of 2
P,r
Packet Pg. 25
4.3.a
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM NO.
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES DATE FILED:
RE : EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT CASE #14-2756
Municipal Court : CR-0032778
Related Case : CR032481, PD 14-2529
Related Claim : #
CLAIMANT CATHARINE GRACE ANDRY recounts herein the facts and circumstances
surrounding the Edmonds Police and Animal Control Departments' unlawful seizure of
her pet turtle Limelight, and their subsequent filing of animal cruelty charges against her
without probable cause. The unlawful conduct of Edmonds Animal Control officers in this
matter includes: 1) Unlawful seizure of Claimant's pet turtle in violation of Edmonds
Municipal Code, 2) Fabrication of facts and evidence to support the filing of criminal
charges„and 3) Edmonds P.D. Animal Control Officer Deborah Dawson's failures to meet
even minimal standards of duty and service.
Applicable legal authorities supporting this Claim and future actions include, inter alia:
Edmonds Municipal Code § 5.05.128 (E), RCW § 4.96.010 (Tortious Conduct of Local
Entities); RCW § 16.52.085 (1); UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AMEND. IV (Unlawful Search
and Seizure); WASHINGTON STATE CONSTITUTION, ART. I § 7; State statutory and common
law torts including defamation, trespass, fraud, negligence and conversion.
,Brief Ra kground
Claimant's background, residential, landlord and other issues can be found in the above -
captioned Related Claim , filed concurrently herewith. That Claim alleges
Claimant was arrested unlawfully and without probable cause by the EPD, and details
repeated failures of officers simply to speak with her in order to learn facts relevant to
their investigation. Facts that, if known, would have persuaded them not to arrest her,
and therefore not to have fabricated the evidence necessary to support that arrest. In
this matter, EPD Animal Control Officer (hereinafter'ACO') Deborah Dawson's similar
failures to seek out and speak with Claimant, to get "her side of the story," coupled with
her inexplicably hostile attitude toward Claimant and her husband James O'Brien, were
also the direct cause of this Claim, and the City's liability in this matter.
So egregious were these failures that, aside from one angry, demanding 30 second phone
call to Claimant's hotel room, Dawson completed this entire investigation, closed out 28
pages of reports, supplemental reports, photographs, logs, officer narratives and witness
statements, charged Claimant with a crime, and served her the summons by mail - all
with ZERO INPUT from Claimant herself. Now however, in these pages, Catharine's side
of the story will be told.
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM
PAGE 3 / S`
Packet Pg. 26
4.3.a
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM
Disposition of Charge
Claimant was charged with one misdemeanor count of 'Animal Cruelty' in the underlying
matter, in violation of Edmonds Municipal Code § 5.05.128(B)(1). ACO Dawson's Report
alleged Claimant had victimized her pet turtle Limelight to such a degree, that the City was
compelled to remove the turtle from her custody. Dawson did not serve the citation and
summons to Catharine in person at 'Andy's Motel' in Edmonds (where she was staying to
comply with the protective order against her in #14-2529, mandating she not come within
500 feet of her "victim" Marlin Phelps). Instead, Dawson telephoned that hotel, and rang
Claimant's room. O'Brien answered, and told her Andry was taking a nap. Dawson bullied
O'Brien, who woke Andry. Dawson then bullied Andry, from whom she extracted the one
and only piece of information she sought: an address where she could mail the summons.
Having done so, she hung up. All in 30 seconds.
The Animal Cruelty charge was dismissed outright, on the City's motion, at just the second
court hearing in the matter. Curiously, this dismissal took one fewer hearings than the three
that took place before the City moved for and was granted dismissal of the domestic
violence charge against her.
ilnluw ul Im oundi a Turtle
On June 16, 2014, Claimant's pet turtle Limelight was removed from her residence and
impounded by the Edmonds Police and Animal Control Departments in violation of the
Edmonds Municipal Code and Washington State Statute. "Snohomish Incident Report -
Edmonds PD #14-2756" (hereinafter "Report"), begins with Dawson's Synopsis:
"Cpl Ramseur asked me to accompany her to a residence to
impound a turtle for safe keeping as the owner was arrested. At
U840 hours, Cpl Ramseur and I contacted [... ] Marlin Phelps
outside his residence to bring the turtle outside. [... I About 5
minutes later, he had a black plastic Flower pot in his hand and
[inside it I saw a] turtle. I placed this turtle in the animal control
carrier and tnsported it."
Edmonds Municipal Code § 5.05.128(E) states:
"E. If a law enforcement officer or ACO has probable cause to believe
an owner of an animal has committed animal cruelty, the officer may
authorize, with a warrant the seizure and removal of the animal to a
suitable place for feeding and care. An animal may be seized and
removed without a warrant only if the animal is in an immediate
life -threatening condition." (Emphasis supplied).
There was no warrant in this matter, and the Report offers no showing of probable cause.
Nor were there any facts or circumstances supporting a conclusion that the turtle was
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM
PAGE 4 /
Packet Pg. 27
4.3.a
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM
removed due to an "immediate, life -threat ening condition." In fact, quite the opposite. The
decision to seize Limelight was made sight unseen: "Ramseur asked me to accompany her
to ... impound a turtle"; Ramseur stated they were impounding the turtle because "the
owner was arrested," not because of concerns for the turtle's health; and ultimately, that the
animal care facility Limelight was taken to examined her upon intake, and rated her overall
health as "FAIR."
It is relevant here to contrast how the results of an analysis of these facts in this context
differs from an analysis of the same facts and whether the seizure violated Claimant's Fourth
Amendment rights. There, Phelps' actions might seen as granting "consent" to a search and
seizure because he was the owner of the residence. Here thoughThe difference here are
the Municipal Code's specific parameters for whether and when an animal may be
impounded by police, and they are are specifically spelled out in the Edmonds Municipal
Code, and they do not include third party consent.
Accordingly then, Claimant's pet turtle Limelight was taken unlawfully and in violation of
Edmonds Municipal Code § 5.05.128 (E), RCW § 16.52.085(1), and the CONSTITUTION OF
WASHINGTON, ART. I § 7.
Y�J�,
HE CLAIM FORM AND THESE THREE PAGES Of THE
ATTACHMENT TO THE CLAIM WERE FILED ON DUNE 15
TO PROTECT THE LIMIOTATIONS PERIOD FOR ONE OF
CLAIMANT'S CAUSES OF ACTION HERE.
BECAUSE OF A BROKEN (BRAND NEW) PRINTER,
CLAIMANT CANNOT YET SUBMIT HER
COMPREHENSIVE "SUPPLEMENTAL
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM WITH EXHIBITS."
HOWEVER, SHE WILL HAVE IT PREPARED ON
OR BEFORE FRIDAY, JUNE 24, AND ASKS THE
CITY CONSIDER IT AT THAT TIME.
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM PAGE S /S
Packet Pg. 28
CITY OF EDMONDS Y.,1�
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM
'l CeIVBd 4y CI
This form complaint and the attached three supplement pages are filed on I�j
June 15 to preserve one of Claimant's limitations periods. PLEASE SEEPAGE t7fi4` to iS-/b
Please take note that CATHARINE GRACE ANDRY who currently resides 18109 ,HIf-iRAPM
#216, LYNNWOOD WA, 98037, mailing address P.O. BOX 353, SEATTLE WA 98111
, home phone # 206.607.7356 , work phone # 213.985.5825 , and who resided at
SW, EDMONDS, WA 98026 at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is 4-15-1970 , is claiming damages
against CITY OF EDMONDS & EPD in the sum of $ (SEE ATTACHMENT) arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
OFFCRS RACHEL RAMSEUR and RICHARD SMITH
DATE OF OCCURRENCE; JUNE 15 and 16, 2014 TIME: Afternoon and Evening
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 8014 215TH STREET SW - EDMONDS WA 98026
DESCRIPTION:
Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage.
(Please see short Attachment to Claim attached hereto)
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers.
JAMES CASEY O'BRIEN. MARLIN PHELPS, RYAN PHELPS, TANNER PHELPS and EDMONDS P.D. OFFICERS
BA1:.HEL BAMSE R, BRAD PAULSER RICHARD SMITH, SACKVIjF,and PLOPAER
3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? n/a Yes No
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy #;
* * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * *
License Plate #
Type Auto:.._
(year) (make)
DRIVER:
Address:
Phone#:
Passengers:
Name:
Address;
Fonn Revised 05/06/14
Driver License #
(model)
OWNER:
Address:
Phone#:
Name:
Address:
Form Page I of 2
Owl �
Packet Pg. 29
4.3.b
* * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * *
i. CATHARINE GRACE ANDRY , being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above
described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledge that any
Information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.
Q
State of Washington
County of�a�! (S
Signature of Claimant(s)
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A'u4 the person who appeared before me, and said
person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated
�r s
My
appointment /
Please present the completed claim form to:
Fonn Revised 05/06/14
City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Form Page 2 of 2
cht/� ,9. 2 �' �
Packet Pg. 30
4.3.b
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM NO:
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES DATE FILED
RE : EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT CASE #14-2529
Muni Court CR 0032481
Related EPD 14-2527,14-2528
Related Case 14-2756, CR032778
Related Claim #
CLAIMANT CATHARINE GRACE ANDRY recounts herein the facts and circumstances
surrounding her unlawful arrest by the Edmonds Police Department on June 15, 2014.
The conduct and actions of EPD officers in this matter include: 1) Failure to follow
statutory requirements for domestic violence calls, 2) Fabrication of evidence and
misstatement of witness statements such that the arrest report and officer narratives
would give the false impression there was probable cause to arrest her, and 3) A
strange and improper animus directed toward her by officers Rachel Ramseur and
Richard Smith.
The EPD's failures to properly discharge their duties in good faith resulted in the
arrest and jailing of Claimant without probable cause. As such, RCW § 10.99.070 and
common law immunities do not apply. Applicable legal authority supporting this
Claim and any related future actions include, inter alia: RCW § 4.96.010 (Tortious
Conduct of Local Governmental Entities); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Violation of Civil Rights
under Color of Authority); WASHINGTON STATE CONSTITUTION, ART. I § 3; and state
common law torts including false imprisonment, fraud, defamation and negligence.
Bullet Points
Marlin Phelps was a "One -Man Domestic Violence Crime Wave"until he was evicted
from the Edmonds home he and his ex-wife shared at 8014 215th Street on Christmas
Eve 2015.
On the date in question here - June 15, 2014 - Marlin was beating on Claimant, hoping
to force her to leave his home. The second time Catharine called 911 that day, the
emergency operator's actions along with her log and notes clearly indicate Phelps was
the aggressor, and she the victim (Please see 91T 1 L.o attached to this Attachment)
Even so, Rachel Ramseur and Richard Smith found a a way to reverse those roles
when they arrived on the scene. Despite the fact neither Phelps nor his nephew made
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM
PAGE 3 /-7-
Packet Pg. 31
4.3.b
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM
FILED Slr9,1P:
any complaint of physical violence by Catharine, Ramseur - evincing a dislike for
Claimant that appeared to border on hatred. What else can you call it when she
twists the standard DV investigation protocol and the facts to arrest Andry instead of
Phelps.
Note this: In her 44 years, Catharine has never been charged nor convicted of
anything, she has a 100% spotless record.
Phelps on the other hand, he was, as stated, a "One -Man Domestic Violence
Crime Wave." On this day when Ramseur twisted facts and fabricated witness
statements, Phelps was the defendant in EIGHT OPEN CRIMINAL CASES in
Edmonds Municipal Court alone - FOUR of these cases charged him with
domestic violence. (Please see attached copy of the Phelps Case Docket on
that date).
Finally - for now, there is much more - Ramseur and Smith both claimed they
saw no bruises anywhere on Catharine. Well SURPRISE, you liars! Get a load
of the last page attached here. Good luck explaining how you missed that.
PLEASE NOTE:
THE CLAIM FORM AND THESE TWO PAGES OF THE
ATTACHMENT AND THREE EXHIBITS WERE FILED
ON JUNE 15 TO PROTECT THE LIMITATIONS PERIOD
FOR ONE OF CLAIMANT'S CAUSES OF ACTION HERE.
BECAUSE OF A BROKEN (BRAND NEW) PRINTER,
CLAIMANT CANNOT YET SUBMIT HER
COMPREHENSIVE "SUPPLEMENTAL
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM WITH EXHIBITS."
HOWEVER, SHE WILL HAVE IT PREPARED ON
OR BEFORE FRIDAY, JUNE 24, AND ASKS THE
CITY CONSIDER IT THEN.
ATTACHMENT TO CLAIM
PAGE 4 /_�_
Packet Pg. 32
4.3.b
06/16/14 07:03:08 PRINT REQUESTED BY TERMINAL EPPC19
Incident History for: #EP14013320
Case Numbers: $EP14002529__
Received 06/15/14 17:15:58 BY SCPC07 SCS13
Dispatched 06/iS/14 17:17:21 BY SCPC01 SC798
Onscene 06/1S/14 17:19:32
Closed 06/15/14 20:26:54
Initial Type: DVP Initial Alarm Level: Final Alarm Level:
Final Type: DVP (PHYSICAL DOMESTIC) Pri: 1 Dispo: A
Police BLK: E015 Fine BLK: EF156 Map Page: 454 Group: EP1
Loc Info:
/1717 (SC813 ) ENTRY
/1.717 (SC798 ) DISP
/1717 ASST
/1717 (SC813 ) SUPP
/1717
/1718
/1718
/1718
/1718
/1.719
/1721
/1722
/1722
/1722
/1722
/1722
/1723
/1723
/1723
/1724
/1724
/1724
/1724
/1729
/1751
,r 1751
/1751
/1.754
(SC798 )
(SC798 )
(SC813 )
(SC798 )
(SC813 )
(SC798 )
(SC813 )
(SC798 )
(EP1619)
(SC798 )
ENROUT
SUPP
SUPP
SUPP
ONSCNE
SUPP
SUPP
MISC
CHGLOC
SUPP
ONSCNE
ONSCNE
SUPP
SUPP
SUPP
NEWLOC
CHGLOC
*ONSCNE
MISC
Oil
OK
OK
OK
ASNCAS
Addr: 20631 50 AV - W SECTOR. Phone: 2138410748
MALE VS FEMALE SCREAMING, FEMALE WHISPERING
61E1 #EP1619 SMITH, RICHARD
61E9 #EP1555 R.AMSEUR, CRPL RACHEL
OPEN LINE, FEMALE IN BACKGROUND SAYING "OH
GOD", PH2 CO 8, ADDRESS FROM MAPPING
61E1
TXT: FEMALE CONE ADDRESS AND DOMESTIC
TXT: WILL NOT ANSWERING QUESTIONS
SOUNDS LIKE PHONE WAS SET DOWN, FEMALE CRYI
NO IN BACKGROUND
61E9 #EP0923 PAULSON,BRADLEY
TXT: QUIET NOW
TXT: LINE DISC
61E9 , W/A VERBAL
61E9 (8014 215 ST SW )
TXT: FEMALE BACK ON LINE, SCARED
61E9 , SOMEONE CHECK THE LOC
61E2 [A/C)
AID DECLINED, NO WEAPONS,614, MED BUILD,
L/PHELPS F/MARLIN 50
TXT: PUT RP IN STRANGLE HOLD
TXT: RP GOING TO DOOR
61E2 [8014 215 PL SW ,EDMI
61E2 (61E91S LOCI
61E1
G1E9 ,W/THE CALLER
61E1
61E1 , C4 1 IN OUST
61E2 , C4 1 IN OUST
61E9 , C4 1 IN CUST
61E9 $EP14002529
Q
6T/11
Packet Pg. 33
4.3.b
Edmonds Municipal Court
CR0032465
4ZO151450
CR0033203
CR0033204
Criminal Traffic
Case Dumber
4ZO154001
4Z0066277
5Z0076735
Name
Phelps, Marlin Edgar
Phelps, Marlin Edgar
P = Marlin Edgar
Phelps,- Marlin Edgar
e ps, Marlin Edgar
Name
Phelps, Marlin Edgar
Phelps, Marlin Edgar
Phelps, Marlin Edgar
File Date
02-25-14
05-06-14
05-14-14
05-14-14
04-17-15
File Date
02-25-14
03-28-14
02-12-15
Participant
Defendant
Defendant
Defendant
Defendant
Defendant
Participant
Defendant
Defendant
Defendant
THIS DATE: Phelps is Defendant in 8 open
Edmonds MC cases, 4 Domestic Violence
OTHER
PHELPS
CRIMINAL
CASES
(10 yrs only)
1.
Phelps,
Marlin
Defendant
Lynm"d Municipal
2.
Phelps,
Marlin
DEFFND.At+T
Snohorrish Superior
3.
Phelps,
Marlin
DEFE,%D.k%T
Snohorrish Su pe rior
4.
Phalpa,
Marlin
Dafandant:
Kingp Count k� 961strict
S.
Phelps,
Marlin
DEFE%DANT
Snohorrish Suoerior
6.
Phelps,
Marl in
Defendant
Snahorri sh District
7.
Phelps,
Marlin E
Defendant
Lynrywood Municipal
8,
Phelps,
Marlin
Defendant
8rarrarton Municipal
9.
Phelps;
Marlin
Defendant
Snohomish District
10
Phalps,
1.1ar1in
Defendant
Edmonds Municipal
11
Ph* ps ,
Marl in
Defendant
Ed+ronds Municipal
12
Phelps,
Marl in
Defendant
Snohori sh Oi strict
13
Phelps,
Marlin
Defendant
Snohomish District
14
Phelps,
Marlin
Defendant
Ed+ronds municipal
1S
Phe1 pit:
Marlin
Defendant
Edmonds Municipal
16
Phalps,
Marlin
Defendant
King County District
Case No File Date
1S02S6877
10-07-201S
14-2-12S93-1
02-06-2014
14-2-13908-8
06-OS-2014
C00029129
06-29-2011
1S-2-0689S-2
10-29-201S
220883SO7
11-26-2012
C00047S40
04-02-2007
16199101
09-08-200S
D14-00112
10-16-2014
32062S816
07-07-2013
42'Jx6276
03-28-2014
420891242
10-30-2014
D14-03112
10-16-2014
S20073977
08-OS-201S
S2112S990
11-09-201S
320648434
07-23-2013
Packet Pg. 34
4.3.b
Left chin and neck, Right arty
PHOTOS ; Tues. 6w-17-2014
m
E
R
G
f N
E
I
N
N
M
m
t0
Lo
r
N
N
fC
L
O
�c
C
U
a
E
.,9
a
4(1?, --
Packet Pg. 35
4.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Approval of Claim Checks
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
Approval of Claim Checks #220390 through #220511 dated June 16, 2016 for $1,107,417.13
Staff Recommendation
Approval of Claim Checks.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
voucher listing
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers-6-16-16
Packet Pg. 36
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page:
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220390
6/16/2016
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
368222
WWTP: PEST CONTROL: 5/12/16 SERVI
Pest Control Service for: 5/12/16
N
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
73.0( v
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
7.1( U
Total:
80.1! E
220391
6/16/2016
061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX
616111
P&R: 3 ON 3 SPRING BASKETBALL TSF
U
P&R: 3 ON 3 SPRING BASKETBALL TSF
O
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
42.9(
9.8% Sales Tax
0
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
4.2( Q
Total:
47.1( Q
220392
6/16/2016
000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
9910
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHAR(
M
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHAR(
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
153,243.1 ,
Total :
153,243.1
to
220393
6/16/2016
075199 ALESSANDRINI, IOLE
01.06,08,2016
PA4TH AVE INTERIM ART PROJECT
4TH AVE INTERIM ART PROJECT: DON)
t
117.200.64.575.50.41.00
5,000.0(
03.06.14.2016
PAALESSANDRINI 4TH AVE INTERIM Al
>
PAALESSANDRINI 4TH AVE INTERIM Al
C
117.200.64.575.50.41.00
6,000.0(
G)
Total:
11,000.0( t
v
220394
6/16/2016
065568 ALLWATER INC
061016059
WWTP: DRINKING WATER SERVICE
Q
Water services (plus rental/supplies
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
26.1(
Total:
26.11
220395
6/16/2016
074695 AMERICAN MESSAGING
W4101046QF
WATER WATCH PAGER FEES
Water Watch Pager Fees
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
4.5:
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 37
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 2
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220395
6/16/2016
074695 074695 AMERICAN MESSAGING
(Continued)
Total :
4.S
220396
6/16/2016
074718 AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES INC
11112
CHEMICALS YOST, FOUNTAIN, SPRAY
CHLORINE, STABILIZER FOR YOST
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
359.0(
FOAM OUT FOR FOUNTAIN
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
95.5;
PULSAR BRIQUETTES FOR SPRAY PAF
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
122.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
56.5(
Total :
633.0;
220397
6/16/2016
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1988635774
WWTP: UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS
wwtp uniforms
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
5.1(
wwtp mats & towels
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
108.52
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
0.5(
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.6,
1988635775
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
56.7;
1988639881
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1'
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 38
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 3
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220397
6/16/2016
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0£
N
9.8% Sales Tax
v
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.1E
9.8% Sales Tax
U
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6( E
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6(
9.8% Sales Tax
O
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6( >
9.8% Sales Tax
0-
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6( Q
9.8% Sales Tax
Q
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.5�
1988639882
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS
M
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
6.4E
FLEET DIVISION MATS
n
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
12.3£ =
L
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
0.6,
9.8% Sales Tax
O
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.2, r
Total :
237.5, d
E
220398
6/16/2016
071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM
0925630-IN
WWTP: 6/6/16 DIESEL FUEL
v
ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (includes
423.000.76.535.80.32.00
1,684.4! Q
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.32.00
165.0,
Total :
1,849.5,
220399
6/16/2016
070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
88344
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
150.4£
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 39
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 4
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220399
6/16/2016
070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
(Continued)
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
155.0,
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
540.1,
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
540.1,
9.6% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
14.4!
9.6% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
14.4!
9.6% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
14.8£
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
150.4£
Total :
1,580.01
220400
6/16/2016
002097 BARKER, ROBERT
BARKER 06-16
MILEAGE FOR APPEARANCE AT MARII
MILEAGE TO/FM TUALATIN, OR FOR
001.000.41.521.22.43.00
218.1(
Total :
218.14
220401
6/16/2016
002100 BARNARD, EARL
038-2016
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
617.000.51.517.20.23.00
220.0(
Total :
220.01
220402
6/16/2016
071348 BERGERABAM
314911
E4MB.SERVICES THRU 5/13/16
E4MB.Services thru 5/13/16
016.000.66.518.30.41.00
13,387.1'
Total:
13,387.1'
220403
6/16/2016
069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC
7825
ESGA.SERVICES THRU 5/27/16
ESGA.Services thru 5/27/16
423.200.75.594.35.41.00
2,543.6E
7826
ESFE.SERVICES THRU 5/27/16
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 40
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 5
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220403
6/16/2016
069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC
(Continued)
ESFE.Services thru 5/27/16
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
606.0(
7840
ESGB.SERVICES THRU 5/27/16
ESGB.Services thru 5/27/16
423.200.75.594.35.41.00
10,575.6E
7847
ESJB.SERVICES THRU 5/27/16
ESJB.Services thru 5/27/16
421.200.74.594.34.41.00
11, 023.8,
Total :
24,749.1
220404
6/16/2016
075342 BORUCHOWITZ, ROBERT
6/15/16
MAY 2016 PUBLIC DEFENSE CONSULT,
May 2016 Public defense consultant
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
870.8,
Total :
870.8:
220405
6/16/2016
067391 BRAT WEAR
18900
INV 18900 MORRISON PANTS
2 TRADITIONAL PANTS - MORRISON
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
178.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
17.4,
18931
INV 18931 TRAFFIC SAFETY VESTS - E
TRAFFIC SAFETY VESTS W/REFLECTI)
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
222.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
21.7E
Total :
439.2(
220406
6/16/2016
072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
20936 YOGA
20936 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20936 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
244.8(
20939 YOGA
20939 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20939 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
265.6£
20942 YOGA
20942 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20942 YOGA INSTRUCTION
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 41
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 6
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220406
6/16/2016
072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
468.0(
20945 YOGA
20945 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20945 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
286.6!
20948 YOGA
20948 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20948 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
556.6`.
20951 YOGA
20951 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20951 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
393.7!
20954 PILATES YOGA
20954 PILATES YOGA FUSION INSTRU(
20954 PILATES YOGA FUSION INSTRU(
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
388.2(
Total:
2,603.7:
220407
6/16/2016
066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL
14268826
WWTP: PROJECT #148594 EDMONDS ;
001-003: Project Management - for
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
533.2!
Total:
533.2!
220408
6/16/2016
069295 BROWN, CANDY
20990 HUMMINGBIRDS
20990 HUMMINGBIRDS INSTRUCTION
20990 HUMMINGBIRDS INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
140.8(
Total:
140.81
220409
6/16/2016
071816 CARLSON, JESSICA
21052 ADVENTURES IN
21052 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INS]
21052 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INSI
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
420.0(
Total:
420.01
220410
6/16/2016
075092 CASCADE BICYCLE CLUB ED FNDN
40070
E3DC.SERVICES THRU 5/4/16
E3DC.Services thru 5/4/16
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
8,433.9,
Total :
8,433.9d
220411
6/16/2016
064291 CENTURY LINK
206-Z02-0478
WWTP: TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 42
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 7
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220411
6/16/2016
064291 CENTURY LINK
(Continued)
WWTP: TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
147.5,
Total :
147.51
220412
6/16/2016
071358 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES
2337240
WWTP: ELECTRA COAT NAC MM AERC
ELECTRA COAT NAC MM AEROSOL
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
186.1(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
19.6E
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
20.1(
Total :
225.9;
220413
6/16/2016
063902 CITY OF EVERETT
116001105
WATER QUALITY - WATER LAB ANALYE
Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
1,134.0(
Total :
1,134.0E
220414
6/16/2016
004095 COASTWIDE LABS
GW2883613
PM: ECOGREEN RL TWL, TT, LINERS
PM
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1,313.6(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
128.7,
GW2883985
PM: LINERS, PREFERENCE, ECOGREE
PM: LINERS, PREFERENCE, ECOGREE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1,694.8'
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
166.04
GW2884752
PM: LINERS, TT, PURELL
PM: LINERS, TT, PURELL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1,270.1 E
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
124.4E
GW2884752-3
PM: LINERS, HAND SANIT, TT
PM: LINERS, HAND SANIT, TT
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 43
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220414 6/16/2016 004095 COASTWIDE LABS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
NW2879104-2
PM: DOME TOP
PM: DOME TOP
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
NW2883613
PM: BRAWNY, SPRAYER, SOAP, TANK
PM: BRAWNY, SPRAYER, SOAP, TANK
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
NW2883985
PM: ACCLAIM, BRAWNY, SEAT COVER;
PM: ACCLAIM, BRAWNY, SEAT COVER;
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
NW2884752
PM: ACCLAIM, BRAWNY, SEAT COVER:
PM: ACCLAIM, BRAWNY, SEAT COVER:
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
NW2884752-1
PM: BRAWNY, DISNF, WASP KILLER, SF
PM: BRAWNY, DISNF, WASP KILLER, SF
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
NW2884752-2
PM: BRAWNY, DISNF, WASP KILLER, SF
PM: BRAWNY, DISNF, WASP KILLER, SF
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
4.4.a
Page: 8
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 44
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 9
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220415
6/16/2016
072848 COPIERS NW
1396314
INV 1396314ACCT HMH636 EDMONDS
COPIER LEASE 5/5-6/4/16
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
226.7"
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
22.2:
1396315
INV 1396315 ACCT HMH636 EDMONDS
5320 B/W COPIES
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
42.5E
2744 COLOR COPIES
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
128.9'
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
16.8'
Total :
437.3:
220416
6/16/2016
063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC
235815
SEWER - SUPPLIES
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
506.3,
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
49.6:
Total :
555.91
220417
6/16/2016
075652 DERR, BARON
rec066298
REFUND OF TREE REMOVAL FEE STF:
REFUND OF TREE REMOVAL FEE STF:
001.000.257.620
225.0(
Total:
225.01
220418
6/16/2016
069030 DETECTION INSTRUMENTS CORP
6654-33542
WWTP: L2 CALIBRATION+ODALOG L2 -
L2 CALIBRATION + ODALOG L2 TOP C1
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
394.9!
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
11.2;
Total:
406X
220419
6/16/2016
064531 DINES, JEANNIE
16-3661
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6/7/16
06/07/2016 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AN
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
326.7(
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 45
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 10
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220419
6/16/2016
064531 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
(Continued)
Total :
326.7(
220420
6/16/2016
075666 DIRKSEN, KIMBERLY
6/10 REFUND
6/10 REFUND
6/10 REFUND
001.000.239.200
100.0(
Total :
100.0(
220421
6/16/2016
074389 DRAKE, BARB
APRIL RANGER TRAVEL
APRIL, 2016 RANGER TRAVEL
APRIL RANGER TRAVEL
001.000.64.571.23.43.00
22.1 ,
MAY 2016 MILEAGE
MAY 2016 RANGER MILEAGE
MAY 2016 RANGER MILEAGE
001.000.64.571.23.43.00
172.3E
Total:
194.5(
220422
6/16/2016
075468 DRAMA KIDS
20667 DRAMA KIDS
20667 DRAMA KIDS INSTRUCTION
20667 DRAMA KIDS INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
940.9!
Total:
940.9!
220423
6/16/2016
075515 ECOSS
ECOSS.06.06.16
ECOSS 205.SPILL CONTROL & RESPOI
ECOSS 205.Spill Control & Response
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
125.0(
Total:
125.0(
220424
6/16/2016
068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL
16-10748
WATER QUALITY - D/DBP STAGE 1 MOI
Water Quality - D/DBP Stage 1 Monitoring
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
1,096.0(
Total :
1,096.0(
220425
6/16/2016
007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
61589
PM: BALL PACK, BATTERY, BATTERY C,
PM: BALL PACK, BATTERY, BATTERY C,
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
117.0E
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
11.4 ,
Total:
128.5!
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 46
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 11
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220426
6/16/2016
074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC
001617
PM: SPRAY PARK DMV SCH, DMV 90 El
PM: SPRAY PARK DMV SCH, DMV 90 El
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
29.1,
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.8(
Total :
31.9,
220427
6/16/2016
069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
20934 ROBERTSON SCH
2O934 MAKAI ROBERTSON YOUTH SCI
20934 MAKAI ROBERTSON YOUTH SCF
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
75.0(
21076 MAGGARD SCHOL
21076 AURORA MAGGARD YOUTH SCF
21076 AURORA MAGGARD YOUTH SCF
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
75.0(
Total:
150.0(
220428
6/16/2016
008550 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15
EDWHS ON THE FENCE
EDWHS ON THE FENCE ART INSTALLA
EDWHS ON THE FENCE ART INSTALLA
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
500.0(
Total :
500.0(
220429
6/16/2016
008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
1-00575
OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / METER
OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
129.9,
1-00655
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST / ME
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST / ME
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
44.7'
1-00825
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM / N
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM / N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
999.0,
1-00875
SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST / METER 1619
SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST / METER 1619
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
112.1
1-00925
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AVE / I
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AVE /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
41.1 ,
1-01950
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE / ME
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 47
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 12
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
220429 6/16/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued)
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSETAVE / ME
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
41.1 , ..
1-02125
SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ METE
�c
U
SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ METE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
62.4E U
1-03710
SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST / METER 718j
E
SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST / METER 718j
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
44.7'
1-03900
SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / METER 7
O
SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / METER 7
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
41.1 , LO
1-03950
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (NORTH) 200 DAY
Q
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST /
Q
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
605.8E
1-05125
SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METER 7�
M
SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METER 7�
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
66.0' Of
1-05285
SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / METEI
c
SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / METEI
A
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
41.1 y
1-05340
SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / METER 1
SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / METER 1
O
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
55.3E >
1-05350
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200 DAY
a
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200 DAY
a)
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
92.1, v
1-05650
CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71458E
CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71458E Q
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 41.1
1-05675 CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP / MEl
CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP / MEl
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 825.2!
1-05700 SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER 719E
SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER 719E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 105.0!
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 48
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 13
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220429 6/16/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued)
1-05705
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
83.8( hd
U
1-09650
SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST / METER 699j
N
SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST / METER 699j
t
U
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
62.4E E
1-09800
SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / METER
SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / METER
V
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
4"
58.9' O
1-10778
FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75761z
FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75761z
0-
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
286.0E Q
1-10780
SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER 516,
Q
SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER 516,
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
69.5E M
1-13975
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 690
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 690
of
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
c
651.7'
1-14000
CITY HALL 115 5TH AVE N / METER 243
A
CITY HALL 115 5TH AVE N / METER 243
y
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
119.1( v
1-16130
SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METER 87
O
SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METER 87
>
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
90.8C '.
1-16300
SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / METER E
d
E
SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / METER E
t
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
179.5£
1-16420
LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER 6997,
Q
LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER 6997,
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
41.1 ,
1-16450
CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER 150 `.
CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER 150 E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
90.8E
1-16630
SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST / METER 752'
SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST / METER 752'
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 49
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 14
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220429
6/16/2016
008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
392.5,
1-17475
SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / METER i
SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / METER i
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
97.9!
1-19950
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METER 616
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METER 616
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
78.9,
1-36255
SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / METER 3
SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
41.1 ,
Total :
5,693.1 ,
220430
6/16/2016
075566 EHRBAR, PAMELA
BID-06142016
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR 6/7-6
BID Administrative services 6/7-6/13/16
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
418.5(
Total :
418.5(
220431
6/16/2016
008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
AR42055
COPIER CHARGES FOR C1030
Coper charges for C1030
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
15.9i
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
1.5,
AR42315
PM PRINTER C1030 #A7078
PM PRINTER C1030 #A7078
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
30.1 ,
Total :
47.61
220432
6/16/2016
009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
EDH704181
CITY NOTICES REZONE PLN20160019
CITY NOTICES-
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
115.2�
Total :
115.21
220433
6/16/2016
066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
WAMOU39841
WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
125.7,
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 50
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 15
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220433
6/16/2016
066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
(Continued)
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
12.3,
WAMOU39911
WATER - SHOVELS SUPPLIES
Water - Shovels Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
263.1,
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
25.7E
Total :
426.94
220434
6/16/2016
009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
0508250
FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 8902 2
Fire Hydrant Replacement 8902 205th PI
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
3, 304.2 ,
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
323.8,
0508756
WATER METER - #2025 M-METER-01-0
Water Meter- #2025 M-METER-01-010
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
591.2(
#2024 - M-METER-0.625-010
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
3,728.7(
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
423.3!
Total :
8,371.3d
220435
6/16/2016
069469 FLINT TRADING INC
196395
PM: HANDICAP TORCH DOWNS FOR R
PM: HANDICAP TORCH DOWNS FOR R
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
1, 752.3:
9.8% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
171.7:
Total :
1,924.0!
220436
6/16/2016
075654 FLORIAN, ADRIAN
12829
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
102.4,
Total:
102.4,
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 51
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220437 6/16/2016 011900 FRONTIER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 16
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
253-011-1177
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO F
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
6.3E
..
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO F
Y
U
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
24.2E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO F
U
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
24.2E
E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO F
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
24.2E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO F
O
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
24.2E
>
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO F
0-
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
24.3(
Q
425-712-0417
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
Q
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
33.3(
M
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
..
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
33.3(
425-712-0423
WWTP: 6/7 - 7/6/16 SERVICE -AFTER H
LA
AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LINE f
=
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
70.51
L
425-712-8251
PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX, SP)
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRU
3
0
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
16.3,
r
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRU
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
81.6£
E
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRU
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
68.6,
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRU
Q
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
68.6,
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRU
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
91.4E
425-745-4313
CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 MEAE
CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION AL
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
131.3(
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 52
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 17
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220437
6/16/2016
011900 FRONTIER
(Continued)
425-771-4741
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTE
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTE
130.000.64.536.20.42.00
83.2,
425-775-1344 RANGER
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
001.000.64.571.23.42.00
64.6(
425-775-7865
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FIVE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
66.4:
425-776-2742
LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIALACCESS
LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIALACCES£
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
26.Z
Total :
963.6'
220438
6/16/2016
075163 GARCIA-GARCIA, CESAR
11349
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
105.3,
11513
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
111.4,
12915
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
105.3,
12986
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
105.3,
13039
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
105.3:
Total:
532.71
220439
6/16/2016
073821 GEODESIGN INC
1605-201
E3DB.SERVICES THRU 5/20/16
E3DB.Services thru 5/20/16
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
962.3:
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 53
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 18
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220439
6/16/2016
073821 073821 GEODESIGN INC
(Continued)
Total :
962.3:
220440
6/16/2016
069571 GOBLE SAMPSON ASSOCIATES INC
BINV0005682
WWTP: WATM 02 ROTOR
WATM 02 ROTOR
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
434.2!
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
23.45
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
44.8E
Total :
502.61
220441
6/16/2016
012199 GRAINGER
9128515732
SPRAY PARK RAIL
SPRAY PARK RAIL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
315.2!
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
30.9(
Total :
346.11
220442
6/16/2016
012560 HACH COMPANY
9963478
WWTP: LDO MODEL 2 ASSY PROBE
LDO MODEL 2 ASSY PROBE
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
1,757.5(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
66.35
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
178.7!
Total :
2,002.6,
220443
6/16/2016
074814 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES INC
31619
E3DB.SERVICES THRU 5/31/16
E3DB.Services thru 5/31/16
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
1,006.3,
Total :
1,006.3-
220444
6/16/2016
013007 HASNER, EZRAJ
039-2016
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.29.00
1, 319.8t
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 54
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 19
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220444
6/16/2016
013007 HASNER, EZRA J
(Continued)
009.000.39.517.20.23.00
9.2",
041-2016
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.23.00
194.9,
042-2016
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.29.00
796.1(
043-2016
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
deductible reimbursement
009.000.39.517.20.23.00
183.0,
Total :
2,503.1 ,
220445
6/16/2016
010900 HD FOWLER CO INC
14194481
WATER - COUPLINGS, INLETS/OUTLE-
Water - Couplings, Inlets/Outlets,
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
1, 530.2E
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
149.9 ,
14217559
WATER - METER SETTERS -
Water - Meter Setters-
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
864.7E
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.20
84.7E
Total:
2,629.7:
220446
6/16/2016
062899 HUFF, ARIELE
20700 WRITE ABOUT
20700 WRITE ABOUT YOUR LIFE INSTF
20700 WRITE ABOUT YOUR LIFE INSTF
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
112.2(
Total :
112.21
220447
6/16/2016
060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC
26737
WWTP: 100-1200 GEOTECHNICAL DES
100-1200 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SEF
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
437.5(
Total :
437.51
220448
6/16/2016
073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
2809008
SUPPLIES
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 20
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220448
6/16/2016
073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
(Continued)
SUPPLIES
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
151.4 ,
Total:
151.4,
220449
6/16/2016
064655 INNOVAC
INV7319
WWTP: 6/1/16 VAC TRUCK/OPERATOR
6/1/16 VAC TRUCK/OPERATOR —
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
7,367.5(
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
722.0,
Total:
8,089.5,
220450
6/16/2016
075655 ISRAEL, ALLISON MAINE
799
INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
148.3E
Total :
148.3E
220451
6/16/2016
075661 JANET MAPLES DESIGN /IZZY GIRL
BID-06102016
SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT JUNE 1 E
Social media Management June 15, 2016
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
510.0(
Total:
510.0(
220452
6/16/2016
075651 JENSEN, CRAIG
rec065629
REFUND OF TREE REMOVAL FEE STF:
REFUND OF TREE REMOVAL FEE STF:
001.000.257.620
225.0(
Total :
225.0(
220453
6/16/2016
064934 JOHN BARKER LANDSCAPE
6/8 RESTROOM DESIGN
6/8/16 RESTROOM DESIGN
6/8/16 RESTROOM DESIGN
132.000.64.594.76.65.00
10,254.0(
6/8 WATERFRONT RESTO
6/8/16 WATERFRONT RESTORATION D
6/8/16 WATERFRONT RESTORATION D
125.000.64.594.75.41.00
8,295.0(
Total :
18,549.0(
220454
6/16/2016
074888 JOYOUS NOISE LLC
21171 KINDERMUSIK
21171 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
21171 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 21
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220454
6/16/2016
074888 JOYOUS NOISE LLC
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
257.8'
21174 KINDERMUSIK
21174 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
21174 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
249.2,
21177 KINDERMUSIK
21177 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
21177 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
782.0,
21180 KINDERMUSIK
21180 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
21180 KINDERMUSIK INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
137.5(
Total :
1,426.5(
220455
6/16/2016
075646 K-A GENERAL CONST CONTRACTOR
10139
REMOVE CREOSOTE LOGS AT BRACK
REMOVE CREOSOTE LOGS AT BRACK
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
5,139.7'
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
503.6�
10140
PRESSURE WASH NORTH SIDE OF OL
PRESSURE WASH NORTH SIDE OF OL
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
2,198.1,
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
215.4'
Total:
8,056.9,
220456
6/16/2016
069343 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES INC
1607456-1283
E4MB.TO 16-01 SERVICES THRU MAY,
E4MB.TO 16-01 Services thru May 2016
016.000.66.518.30.41.00
642.0(
Total :
642.0(
220457
6/16/2016
017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
0037261
MEADOWDALE ESTATES PEER REVIE\
MEADOWDALE ESTATES PEER REVIE\
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
2,272.6£
Total :
2,272.6£
220458
6/16/2016
074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH
136
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 22
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220458
6/16/2016
074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH
(Continued)
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
300.0(
Total :
300.0(
220459
6/16/2016
073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC
20250
04-16 EXPENSES
04-16 reimbursement for expenses -
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
151.0(
Jun-16
06-16 LEGALS FEES
06-16 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
42,640.0(
Total :
42,791.0(
220460
6/16/2016
075480 MADATH, DONNA
21064 LITTLE FISHES
21064 LITTLE FISHES PRESCHOOL INEE
21064 LITTLE FISHES PRESCHOOL
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
475.2(
Total:
475.2(
220461
6/16/2016
075664 MAJOR, JENNA
6/7 GYM ATTENDANT
6/7/16 PICKLE -BALL GYM ATTENDANT
6/7/16 PICKLE -BALL GYM ATTENDANT
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
10.0(
Total :
10.0(
220462
6/16/2016
075669 MATTER, LAURA
21186 GROW TOMATOES
21186 GROW GREAT TOMATOES INSTF
21186 GROW GREAT TOMATOES INSTF
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
25.0(
Total :
25.0(
220463
6/16/2016
019920 MCCANN, MARIAN
040-2016
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
LEOFF 1 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.29.00
8,505.0(
Total:
8,505.0(
220464
6/16/2016
020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
63969177
WWTP: WORK GLOVE, MAGNIFYING S,
WORK GLOVE, MAGNIFYING SAFETY
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
81.1 ,
Freight
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 58
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 23
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220464
6/16/2016
020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
6.5£
Total :
87.61
220465
6/16/2016
072223 MILLER, DOUG
6/1-6/8 GYM MONITOR
6/1-6/8/16 BASKETBALL GYM MONITOF
6/1-6/8/16 BASKETBALL GYM MONITOF
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
60.0(
Total :
60.01
220466
6/16/2016
020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC
237872
PM: GAS CAN, CHAIR, SHOULDER STU
PM: GAS CAN, CHAIR, SHOULDER STU
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
83.9(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.2,
Total :
92.1.
220467
6/16/2016
064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
0435817-IN
STORM - SMALL TOOLS
Storm - Small Tools
422.000.72.531.40.35.00
20.5(
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.35.00
2.0'
Total:
22.5'
220468
6/16/2016
024910 NORMED
24808-722372
INV 24808-722372 EDMONDS POLICE E
CETAFEN COUGH & COLD
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
13.4£
NUTRALOX ANTACID
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
9.4!
CETAFEN EXTRA
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
8.2(
ASPIRIN
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
2.6 ,
PROPRINAL PAIN RELIEVER
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
34.5:
CETAFEN NON -ASPIRIN
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
6.1(
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 59
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 24
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220468
6/16/2016
024910 NORMED
(Continued)
Freight
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
10.4E
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
10.0E
RELIEF - PE COLD TABLETS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
17.71
Total:
112.71
220469
6/16/2016
025690 NOYES, KARIN
000 00 661
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 6/8/16
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 6/8/16
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
350.0(
Total :
350.0(
220470
6/16/2016
063511 OFFICE MAX INC
239964
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
348.8�
267547
ARTS COMM: SUPPLIES LABELS, WIRE
ARTS COMM: SUPPLIES LABELS, WIRE
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
17.9,
9.8% Sales Tax
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
1.7(
279816
PM: PAPER
PM: PAPER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
22.5(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
2.2(
296497
P&R: LAMIN POUCHES, PAPER
P&R: LAMIN POUCHES, PAPER
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
154.6,
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
15.1 E
296588
P&R: LAM POUCHES
P&R: LAM POUCHES
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
16.1,
9.8% Sales Tax
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 25
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220470
6/16/2016
063511 OFFICE MAX INC
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
1.5E
Total :
580.7 ,
220471
6/16/2016
070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
May, 2016
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITT
Emergency Medical Services & Trauma
001.000.237.120
1,443.3-
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.237.130
31, 040.7£
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.237.150
252.0(
State Patrol Death Investigation
001.000.237.330
81.7,
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.237.180
6,632.6E
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.237.200
317.7,
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.237.250
2,872.4-
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
560.7,
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.237.290
108.8 ,
Multi -Model Transportation
001.000.237.300
108.8E
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
129.7 ,
Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis
001.000.237.170
38.5,
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
463.8-
Total:
44,051.3,
220472
6/16/2016
027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS
127644
CITY PARK SPRAY PARK TOPSOIL
CITY PARK SPRAY PARK TOPSOIL
132.000.64.594.76.65.00
318.0(
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 26
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220472
6/16/2016
027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS
(Continued)
9.8% Sales Tax
132.000.64.594.76.65.00
31.1(
220909
E61FC.SOIL DUMP
E61FC.Soil Dump
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
157.5(
Total:
506.6(
220473
6/16/2016
075667 PATTERSON, NEAH
6/9 REFUND TAX
6/9 REFUND TAX INCORRECTLY CHAR
6/9 REFUND TAX INCORRECTLY CHAR
001.000.239.200
9.8(
Total :
9.8(
220474
6/16/2016
070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC
110608
INV 110608 EDMONDS PD - CASE 16-1,
TOW AAG0884-CASE 16-12854
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
166.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
16.2 ,
Total :
182.2 ,
220475
6/16/2016
027450 PAWS
MAY 2016
MAY 2016 ANIMAL SHELTERING - EDM(
SHELTERING 8 ANIMALS - MAY 2016
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
1,400.0(
MAY 2016 CREDIT
MAY 2016 RECLAIM FEES - EDMONDS
GUARDIAN RECLAIM FEE FORANIMAL
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
-75.0(
Total :
1,325.0(
220476
6/16/2016
074793 PETDATA INC
5091
INV 5091 EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTM
ISSUE 86 LICENSES @ $3.90
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
335.4(
ISSUE 1 REPLACEMENT TAG @ $3.90
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
3.9(
54 LATE FEES @ $2.50
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
135.0(
Total :
474.3(
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 27
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220477
6/16/2016 007800 PETTY CASH
MAR24 THRU JUN 15 MARCH 24 THRU JUNE 15 PETTY CASE
Parking for training - Leif Bjorback
001.000.62.524.20.43.00
8.0(
Mielage to CESCL Training - JoAnne Zula
N
v
001.000.67.518.21.43.00
70.0!
Parking for Meeting - Rob English
U
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
6.0( E
Mileage for meeting - Rob English
001.000.67.518.21.43.00
9.71
Parking for meeting - Rob English
O
112.000.68.595.20.61.00
20.0( >
Planter for native plant display in
0-
001.000.62.524.10.35.00
47.6: Q
Parking for Traffic Impact Fee mtg with
Q
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
22.0(
Mileage to conference - Kernen Lien
M
001.000.62.558.60.43.00
79.7(
Parking for Training - Dee Garrison
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
10.0( N
Total:
273.1! =
L
220478
6/16/2016 008475 PETTY CASH
061516 FAC MAINT - MILEAGE S BRINKLEY
Water - BAT Cert Fee - J Kobylk
p
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
98.0( >
Storm - Supplies - M Brown
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
7.6£ E
Fleet - Unit M16 - Parts - M Adams
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.3£
Fac Maint - Mileage S Brinkley
Q
001.000.66.518.30.49.00
29.0(
Fac Maint - Parking Fee - P Cleveland
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7.0(
Fac Maint - Mileage S Brinkley
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
20.0,
City Hall - Permit Counter Supplies - L
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 63
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 28
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220478
6/16/2016
008475 PETTY CASH
(Continued)
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
61.3,
Fac Maint - Mileage S Brinkley
001.000.66.518.30.49.00
6.6E
Water - Gas for City Car - J Kobylk
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.0(
Water - Water for Crew - V Smith
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
2.5(
Water - CDL - P Rochford
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
102.0(
Total:
354.51
220479
6/16/2016
028400 PITNEY BOWES INC
1000464682
UTILITY BILLING FOLDING MACHINE Al
Utility Billing Folding Machine Annual
421.000.74.534.80.48.00
666.3'
Utility Billing Folding Machine Annual
422.000.72.531.90.48.00
666.3'
Utility Billing Folding Machine Annual
423.000.75.535.80.48.00
666.3,
Total :
1,998.9E
220480
6/16/2016
073231 POLYDYNE INC
1051661
WWTP: CLARIFLOC WE-1081
CLARIFLOC WE-1081
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
2,762.1(
Total:
2,762.1(
220481
6/16/2016
029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
03870
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITY
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITY
422.000.72.531.90.51.00
2,770.7!
Total :
2,770.7!
220482
6/16/2016
064088 PROTECTION ONE
31146525
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 121 5-
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
51.1'
Total :
51.1'
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 29
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220483
6/16/2016
071911 PROTZ, MARGARET
21033 FELDENKRAIS
21033 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTION
21033 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
410.0(
21036 FELDENKRAIS
21036 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTION
21036 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
570.0(
Total:
980.0(
220484
6/16/2016
070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE
15-2795
COURT SECUIRYT
COURT SECUIRYT
001.000.23.512.50.41.00
3,410.0(
Total :
3,410.0(
220485
6/16/2016
030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
00000164156
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HARDESTY
MARKER/I N SCRI PTI ON-HARDESTY
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
125.0(
00000165042
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HOFFER
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HOFFER
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
359.0(
00000165043
SHUTTER/INSCRIPTION-DENTON
SHUTTER/INSCRIPTION-DENTON
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
125.0(
00000165044
SHUTTER/INSCRIPTION-POTTER
SHUTTER/INSCRIPTION-POTTER
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
125.0(
00000165045
SHUTTER/INSCRIPTION-CLARKE
SH UTTER/I NSCRI PTI ON-CLARKE
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
125.0(
00000165216
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-SMITH
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-SMITH
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
359.0(
Total:
1,218.0(
220486
6/16/2016
075638 RAUTU, ROXANA
6/8 MAY MILEAGE
6/8/16 MAY RANGER MILEAGE
6/8/16 MAY RANGER MILEAGE
001.000.64.571.23.43.00
165.2,
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 65
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 30
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220486
6/16/2016
075638 075638 RAUTU, ROXANA
(Continued)
Total :
165.2,
220487
6/16/2016
075288 RODARTE CONSTRUCTION INC
E7AC/E2AD.Pmt 11
E7AC/E2AD.PMT 11 THRU 5/31/16
E7AC.Pmt 11 thru 5/31/16
112.000.68.595.33.65.00
339,103.9;
E2AD.Pmt 11 thru 5/31/16
112.000.68.595.33.65.00
6,140.0(
Total :
345,243.9:
220488
6/16/2016
069593 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC
01804-451265
UNIT 537 - REPAIRS
Unit 537 - Repairs
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
29.9!
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
2.9,
Total :
32.81
220489
6/16/2016
072440 SCORDINO, JOE
4
E7FG.STUDENTS SAVING SALMON RE
E7FG.Students Saving Salmon
001.000.39.554.90.49.00
343.1'
Total:
343.1'
220490
6/16/2016
066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
S3-9*28299
UNIT 120 - SWITCH
Unit 120 - Switch
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
53.0Q
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
5.2(
S3-905663
FLEET - UNIT 134 ANTIFREEZE
Fleet - Unit 134 Antifreeze
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
41.5!
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
4.0
S3-913691
FLEET - UNIT 998 BELT IDLER PULLEY
Fleet - Unit 998 Belt Idler Pulley
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
20.8E
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
2.0t
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
220490 6/16/2016 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC (Continued)
S3-916756
UNIT 453 - MOTOR & FAN ASSEMBLY
Unit 453 - Motor & Fan Assembly
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
S3-919817
UNIT 947 - BRAKE LINING KIT, PRESSU
Unit 947 - Brake Lining Kit, Pressure
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
S3-921647
UNIT 126 - BATTERY
Unit 126 - Battery
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
S3-922556
UNIT 947 - BRAKE LINING KIT
Unit 947 - Brake Lining Kit
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
S3-922703
FLEET UNIT 447 - SPARK PLUGS
Fleet Unit 447 - Spark Plugs
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
S3-929190
UNIT 455 - INJECTOR
Unit 455 - Injector
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
S3-929315
UNIT 681 - EXHAUST GAS/OXYGEN SE
Unit 681 - Exhaust Gas/Oxygen Sensor
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
4.4.a
Page: 31
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 32
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220490
6/16/2016
066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
(Continued)
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
7.5(
S3-935913
UNIT 452 - TRANS OIL
Unit 452 - Trans Oil
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
98.1(
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.6,
S3-936089
UNIT 449 - SPARK PLUGS
Unit 449 - Spark Plugs
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
56.4£
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
5.5:
S3-936954
UNIT 449 - PARTS
Unit 449 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
55.3 ,
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
5.4:
Total :
1,046.2
220491
6/16/2016
061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET
276833
FLEET - SUPPLIES
Fleet - Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
70.3,
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
6.8E
Total:
77.2;
220492
6/16/2016
067474 SHAW, BENSON
2016-06/06 and 06/07
DAYTON PLAZA BRONZE LETTERING
DAYTON PLAZA BRONZE LETTERING
117.200.64.575.50.41.00
3,500.0(
Total :
3,500.0(
220493
6/16/2016
075668 SIGNAL TRAILER SERVICE
6/1 TRAILER
6/1/16 REPLACEMENT TRAILER FOR C
6/1/16 REPLACEMENT TRAILER FOR C
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1, 768.5,
Total :
1.768.5,
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 68
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 33
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220494
6/16/2016
068489 SIRENNET.COM
0201023-IN
UNIT EQ96PO - OUTBOARD SEAT BELT
Unit EQ96PO - Outboard Seat Belt
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
378.0,
0201089-IN
UNIT E111 PO - SURFACE MOUNT
Unit E111 PO - Surface Mount
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
93.6(
0201182-IN
UNIT E111 PO - BRACKET KIT
Unit E111 PO - Bracket Kit
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
7.5(
Total :
479.1 ,
220495
6/16/2016
071725 SKAGIT GARDENS INC
52248091
FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS
FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
136.4!
8.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
11.6(
Total :
148.0!
220496
6/16/2016
060889 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
ARV/28866498
FLEET SHOP TOOLS
Fleet Shop Tools
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
111.3!
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
10.9'
ARV/29002374
FLEET - SHOP MANUALS
Fleet - Shop Manuals
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
3,329.4'
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
326.25
Total :
3,777.91
220497
6/16/2016
075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC
1524
MAY 2016 PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICE:
MAY 2016 PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICE;
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
22,589.5(
Total :
22,589.51
220498
6/16/2016
066754 SNO CO PUBLIC WORKS
1000409183
E6CA/E5CA.SERVICES THRU APRIL 20
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 69
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 34
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220498
6/16/2016 066754 SNO CO PUBLIC WORKS
(Continued)
ESCA.Services thru April 2016
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
928.3E
E6CA.Services thru April 2016
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
2, 861.2 ,
Total :
3,789.6:
220499
6/16/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2002-0255-4
WWTP: 5/6 - 6/616 SERVICE - FLOW ME
WWTP: FLOW METER 2400 HIGHWAY
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
17.9£
2004-9683-4
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD /
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
58.7,
2006-5085-1
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
18.51
2006-5164-4
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
432.E ,
2007-2302-1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METE
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METE
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
24.9,
2008-6924-6
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACHER;
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACHER;
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
35.6 ,
2011-8453-8
HICKMAN PARK
HICKMAN PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
76.3:
2013-8327-0
CITY PARK GAZEBO
CITY PARK GAZEBO
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
18.5,
2014-3123-6
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPI,
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPI,
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
16.25
2014-5305-7
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
Page: 34
Packet Pg. 70
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220499 6/16/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
220500 6/16/2016 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS
220501 6/16/2016 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2017-9000-3
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
2019-2988-2
WWTP: 5/6 - 6/6/16 SERVICE - FLOW MI
WWTP FLOW METER 8421 244TH ST S'
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
2022-8945-0
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METEF
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METEF
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
2025-2920-2
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 400V\
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 400V\
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
2051-8438-5
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METE
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METE
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
2205-4757-4
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH ST SV\
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH ST SV1
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
Total
16-0601-2
Q3-16 COMMUNICATIONS
Q3-16 COMMUNICATIONS
001.000.39.528.00.51.00
Q3-16 COMMUNICATIONS
421.000.74.534.80.51.00
Q3-16 COMMUNICATIONS
423.000.75.535.80.51.00
16-0601-2A
Q3-16 NEW WORLD ASSESSMENT
Q3-16 New World Assessment
001.000.39.528.00.51.00
Total
68469
PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES
PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES
4.4.a
Page: 35
Page: 35
Packet Pg. 71
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 36
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
220501
6/16/2016
006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
819.0(
Total :
819.0E
220502
6/16/2016
071666 TETRATECH INC
51058997
ESFD.SERVICES THRU 5/29/16
ESFD.Services thru 5/29/16
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
2,433.9,
Total :
2,433.9,
220503
6/16/2016
074800 TURNSTYLE INC
BID-3932
WEB MAINTENANCE & CODING FOR Al
Web maintenance and coding requests fo
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
200.0(
Total:
200.01
220504
6/16/2016
063543 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
2082422
ASSOC US PUBLIC FEES- SHANE HOP
ASSOC US PUBLIC FEES- SHANE HOP
001.000.62.524.10.49.00
220.0(
Total :
220.0E
220505
6/16/2016
062693 US BANK
062693
DJC SUBSCRIPTION, REFRESHMENTS
Subscription to Daily Journal of
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
250.0(
Refreshments for Tourism/Marketing
120.000.31.575.42.49.00
15.5E
OfficeSpace web listing for June 2016
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
100.0(
-2519 06-06-2016
INV -2519 06-06-2016 EDMONDS PD
5/15/16 - SPEER DINNER - FIREARMS II
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
9.3£
5/15/16 - SPEER COFFEE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
2.1,
5/16/16 - SPEER COFFEE - FIREARMS
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
2.2£
5/16/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST - FIREARI
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
4.6,
5/16/16 - SPEER LUNCH
Page: 36
Packet Pg. 72
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 37
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 6.5,
5/16/16 - SPEER DINNER
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
19.8, Y
U
5/17/16 - SPEER COFFEE - FIREARMS
N
t
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
2.2£ U
FUEL - FIREARMS TRAINING - SPOKAN
E
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
31.8' ca
5/17/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST - FIREARI
V
4"
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.4' O
5/17/16 - SPEER LUNCH
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.7( OL
5/18/16 - SPEER COFFEE - FIREARMS
Q'
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
2.0' Q
5/18/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
17.0( M
5/18/16 - SPEER LUNCH
=1
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.7(
5/18/16 - SPEER DINNER
n
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
28.1( =
L
5/17/16 - SPEER DINNER - FIREARMS
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
30.1 ,
5/19/2016 - SPEER COFFEE - FIREARM
O
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
2.2£ r
5/19/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST
m
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
15.9' E
5 NIGHTS LODGING - SPEER - FIREARI
v
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
547.6(
5/19/16 - SPEER LUNCH
Q
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 10.0!
5/20/16 - SPEER LUNCH - FIREARMS
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 8.7(
5/20/16 - SPEER DINNER
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 11.1(
5/19/16 - SPEER DINNER
Page: 37
Packet Pg. 73
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 38
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 25.7!
5/22/16 - SPEER DINNER - FIREARMS
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
5.34 Y
U
5/20/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST - FIREARI
N
t
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
10.41 U
FUEL - MOSES LAKE - FIREARMS INST
E
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
22.0, ca
5/22/16 - SPEER LUNCH - FIREARMS
V
4"
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
12.7, O
5/23/16 - SPEER LUNCH - FIREARMS
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.7( OL
5/23/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST
Q.
rL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.6£ Q
5/23/16 - SPEER COFFEE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
4.0£ M
5/23/16 - SPEER DINNER
=1
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
24.3,
5/24/16 - SPEER LUNCH - FIREARMS
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.7( =
L
5/24/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.6`.
5/25/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST - FIREARI
O
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
10.4, r
FUEL - FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR TRAIN
m
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
36.1: E
5/25/16 - SPEER LUNCH
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.7(
5/24/16 - SPEER DINNER
Q
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 28.0(
SPEER - PENS FOR CLASS - FIREARM:
001.000.41.521.40.31.00 1.91
5/25/16 - SPEER DINNER
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 27.5,
05/26/16 - SPEER BREAKFAST - FIREAF
Page: 38
Packet Pg. 74
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 39
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
10.1(
5 NIGHTS LODGING - SPEER - FIREARI
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
547.6(
U
5/26/16 - SPEER LUNCH
N
t
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.7( U
5/27/16 - SPEER LUNCH - FIREARMS
E
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.7( ca
2 PATROL RIFLE OPTICS W/MOUNT
V
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
1,119.9`. O
5/27/16 - SPEER DINNER
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
10.0: OL
5/26/16 - SPEER DINNER
Q'
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
28.0( Q
2985
WWTP: JUNE 2016 CC
Lowe's: primers, power gear, power gear
M
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
688.9£ ..
WEF Training: $45.50-
c
423.000.76.535.80.49.71
11445.5(
L&I Permit: Electrician
MA
423.000.76.535.80.51.00
L
2,189.7( t
-3215 06-06-2016
INV -3215 06-06-2016 COMPAAN EDMO
FUEL - AWC CONF - YAKIMA - COMPAA
O
>
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
12.0,
r
2 NIGHTS LODGING - COMPAAN-
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
201.9, E
2 NIGHTS LODGING - LAWLESS-
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
201.91
5-23-16 DINNER COMPAAN - WASPC Ci
Q
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
22.5!
FUEL FOR CHIEF'S CITY CAR - WASPC
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
20.0(
3 NIGHTS LODGING - COMPAAN-
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
317.8£
-3314 06-06-16
INV - 3314 06-06-2016 EDMONDS PD - I.
Page: 39
Packet Pg. 75
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
5/5/16 DINNER - COMPAAN & LAWLESS
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
DVD DUPLICATOR
001.000.41.521.80.35.00
-3520 6/6/16 -3520 6/6/16 EDMONDS PD CARD 2
HARDWICK FLIGHT TO AK - VANDELAA
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK 5/16 LUNCH
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK 5/16 COFFEE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
FED EX SHIPMENT - CASE 16-10811
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FED EX SHIPMENT - CASE 16-6934
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
HARDWICK 5/16/16 DINNER
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK 5/17/16 LUNCH
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK 5/17/16 COFFEE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK 5/17/16 SNACK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK 5/17/16 DINNER
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK - CAR RENTAL - ALASKA - c
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK 5/18 BREAKFAST
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK - REFUEL RENTAL CAR
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK- ADDT'L FARE FOR EARLY
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
HARDWICK -AIRLINE CHANGE FEE FC
4.4.a
Page: 40
Page: 40
Packet Pg. 76
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 41
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
125.0(
HARDWICK - 3 NIGHT HOTEL IN AK - 2
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
601.4, Y
U
FED EX SHIPPING - CASE 16-9430
N
t
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
24.2E U
FED EX SHIPPING - CASE 16-11745
E
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
15.2, ca
4675 PARKS CR CARD 4675 PARKS CR CARD
V
AMAZON: RIBBON FOR RIBBON CUTTI
O
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
31.0(
BURLINGTON: EXPO STOOLS, CUPS
0
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
45.9( Q
ITHACA SPORTS: 6 ROLLS PURPLE CL
Q
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
22.2(
FRED MEYER: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES
04
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
43.7E ..
HOME DEPOT: EXPO PVC
c
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
5.01
LOWES: SOIL HEALTH & FITNESS EXPI
Mn
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
L
34.9E t
BARNES & NOBLE: BOOK FOR PRESCI
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
19.1: O
>
DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY: PRESCH
r
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
77.1 ;
AMAZON: BOOK FOR PRESCHOOL
E
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
9.8,
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
28.45 Q
SNOHOMISH HEALTH DIST: SPRAY PAF
132.000.64.594.76.65.00
276.0(
SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT: POOL
001.000.64.576.80.49.00
164.0(
FEDEX: MATTE PAPER/LAMINATION
130.000.64.536.50.31.00
157.8�
Page: 41
Packet Pg. 77
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 42
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun
(Continued)
AMAZON: YOST SPA IGNITION BRACKE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
54.8E ..
AMAZON: GAS DETECTOR
Y
U
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
738.3(
AMAZON: SELF RETRACTING LIFELINE
U
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
5,023.0: E
4675 PARKS CR CARD 4675 PARKS CR CARD
LOWES: RETURN CHAIR
V
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
-30.1- O
4697 ESCC CHAPERONE AIRLINE TICKETS
Banner for ESCC
0-
138.100.21.557.21.31.00
80.0( Q
retirement frames & framing for Ward &
Q
001.000.21.513.10.41.00
223.0£
File folders + shipping costs
M
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
33.0E ..
airfare for ESCC Chaperone Anita Kotik
c
138.200.21.557.21.43.00
11257.7(
for ESCC Chaperone Robert Allen
MA
=
L
138.200.21.557.21.43.00
1,257.7( t
Facebook ad for ESCC ALT
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
23.3 , O
r
138.100.21.557.21.31.00 7.7£
E
001.000.21.513.10.41.00 21.7( v
tv
001.000.21.513.10.31.00 3.2, Q
5179 MONITORS, NUCS, DATA CARTRIDGE,
Newegg.com -ASUS VE228H 21.5" LED
001.000.25.514.30.35.00 109.9E
Newegg.com - Intel BOXNUC615SYK &
001.000.31.518.88.35.00 1,348.0(
Newegg.com - Kingston ValueRAM 8GB
Page: 42
Packet Pg. 78
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 43
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
123.9E
B&H Photo - Samsung 250GB 850EVO 2.
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
515.1( -hd
Newegg.com - Philips BDM4065UC 40" 4
U
t
001.000.41.521.11.35.00
799.0( U
Provantage LLC - Quantum MR-L6MQN-(
E
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
597.2E ca
Newegg.com - TP-LINK TL-SG105 unmar
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
59.91 O
Newegg.com -ASUS VE228H 21.5" HDM
w
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
228.91 OL
B&H Photo - Samsung 250GB 850 EVOS
Q
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
379.9E Q
Newegg.com - Intel BOXNUC6155SYK &
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
1,309.3E M
Newegg.com - Kingston 8GB 260pin DDR
=1
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
180.0(
Newegg.com - Ergotron 45-214-026 MX
001.000.41.521.11.35.00
141.9E =
L
5419 US BANK- VISA- DEV SERV
office supplies- DSD (amazon, 9 charges)
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
385.6£ 0
refund of mtg fees for Housing Cons.-
..
r
001.000.62.524.10.49.00
-75.0(
WABO- multiple code books
E
001.000.62.524.20.49.00
1,083.4,
ADOBE subscription for Brad Shipley
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
54.8E Q
61516 PASSPORT POSTAGE
PASSPORT POSTAGE
001.000.23.512.50.42.00 64.5(
PASSPORT POSTAGE
001.000.23.512.50.42.00 64.5(
HOTEL FEE FOR COURTADMINISTRA7
Page: 43
Packet Pg. 79
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.23.512.50.43.00
LATE FEE
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
7000
US BANK VISA- SHANE HOPE
PArking for PSRC meeting- Shane Hope
001.000.62.524.10.43.00
-7476 6/6/16
CREDIT FOR WHIA CLASS -7476 CRED
REFUND FOR WHIA CONF - MEHL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
-7476 6/6/16
-7476 6/6/16 EDMONDS PD - BARD
MOTOROLA MICROPHONES & ANTEW
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
PERFORMANCE LEADERSHIP CLASS -
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
4 ELECTRONIC EAR MUFFS; SAFETY C
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
STRUM TECH COLLISION TRAINING - E
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
COMMAND HANGING STRIPS
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
TLO MONTHLY FEE - MAY 2016
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
2 NIKON COOLPIX DIGITAL CAMERAS
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
7483
JUNE MAYORS MONTHLY LUNCHEON
June Mayors monthly luncheon meeting
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
8017
ENG. CREDIT CARD MAY 2016
Eng. Credit Card May 2016
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
E6CA.Construction Notice
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
8304
JUNE US BANK VISA CC BILL
GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR JOB POST
4.4.a
Page: 44
Page: 44
Packet Pg. 80
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
220505 6/16/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 45
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun
(Continued)
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
90.0(
ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR POST
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
150.0(
BARE FOODSTUDENTS JOB POSTING
U
N
t
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
100.0( U
CL JOB POSTING (#16-25) 2 CATEGORI
E
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
90.0( ca
CL JOB POSTING (#16-20) 2 CATEGORI
V
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
90.0( O
JOB POSTING (#16-20)
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
199.0( OL
CL JOB POSTING (#16-13) 2 CATEGORI
Q
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
90.0( Q
WA ST LEOFF EDU - HOTEL 2 NIGHTS
009.000.39.517.20.43.00
268.0( M
FLSA PUBLIC SECTOR COMPLIANCE C
001.000.22.518.10.31.00
101.0(
WEBINAR: BARGAINING BEHAVIOR
001.000.22.518.10.49.00
99.0( =
L
CL JOB POSTING (CUSTODIAN) 2 CATE
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
90.0(
CL JOB POSTING (CIVIL ENGINEERING
0
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
45.0( r
CL JOB POSTING (WATER -QUALITY CC
m
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
45.0( E
CL JOB POSTING (STORMWATER ENG
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
90.0(
Q
CL JOB POSTING (COURT CLERK) 2
001.000.22.518.10.41.40 90.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.22.518.10.43.00 30.0,
-8349 06-06-16 INV -8349 06-06-16 ANDERSON - EDMO
4 - WELDED STEEL SHELVING UNITS F
001.000.41.521.10.35.00 526.0!
Page: 45
Packet Pg. 81
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 46
Bank code:
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220505
6/16/2016
062693 US BANK
(Continued)
DETAIL NEW COMMAND VEHICLE
001.000.41.521.21.48.00
274.5(
FAN FOR CLERK OFFICE VENTILATION
001.000.41.521.11.35.00
21.8E
36 CR123A 3 VOLT LITHIUM BATTERIE;
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
68.3,
RETURN 2 FLASHLIGHTS FOR REPAIR
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
15.1'
HEAVY DUTY 2 HOLE PUNCH
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
21.1 !
Total :
32,592.51
220506
6/16/2016
075155 WALKER MACY LLC
P3282.01-1
CIVIC MASTER PLAN
CIVIC MASTER PLAN
125.000.64.576.80.41.00
10,565.3'
Total:
10,565.3'
220507
6/16/2016
067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
55864
INV 55864 EDMONDS PD - CASE 16-13(
TOW 988 OLDS ARC 8407- CASE 16136
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
166.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
16.2 ,
55956
INV 55956 EDMONDS PD CASE 16-139(
TOW AIN7711 CASE 16-13908
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
166.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
16.2 ,
Total :
364.5,
220508
6/16/2016
047665 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION
01713436
WATER -MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 201
Water - Membership Renewal 2016
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
183.0(
Total:
183.0(
220509
6/16/2016
068227 WCCFA
2016 DUES
2016 MEMBERSHIP DUES CEMETERY
Page: 46
Packet Pg. 82
vchlist
06/15/2016 3:13:09PM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.4.a
Page: 47
Bank code:
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
220509
6/16/2016 068227 WCCFA
(Continued)
2016 MEMBERSHIP DUES CEMETERY
130.000.64.536.20.49.00
472.8! ..
Total:
472.8! v
N
220510
6/16/2016 074073 XP SOLUTIONS
M8593
XPERTCARE/XPSWMM LICENSE RENE
U
Xpertcare/Xpswmm License Renewal
E
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
1,432.0, m
Xpertcare/Xpswmm License Renewal
U
422.000.72.531.40.49.00
4"
1,432.0, O
Total:
2,864.0! cu
O
220511
6/16/2016 075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR
JUNE 3 2016
INV JUNE 3 2016 INMATE HOUSING ED
Q
69 DAYS INMATE HOUSING @$54.75
Q'
Q
001.000.39.523.60.51.00
3,777.7!
Total:
3,777.7!
`N
122
Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total :
1,107,417.1. ..
c
122
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
1,107,417.1: N
L
c.i
O
r
E
a
Page: 47
Packet Pg. 83
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Proiect Title
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STIR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STM
E1 FM
c374
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c376
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STIR
E2AA
c391
Transportation Plan Update
c392
9th Avenue Improvement Project
STIR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c378
rth Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM
E2FB
c379
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STIR
E3AB
c427
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STIR
E3DC
c424
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STIR
E3DE
c426
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM
E3FE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c429
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194thlikk
STM
E3FH
c430
SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E3JB
c418
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
STIR
E4CA
c438
2014 Overlay Program
c451
2014 Chip Seals
WTR
E4CC
c452
2014 Waterline Overlays
c462
220th Street Overlay Project
STIR
E4DA
c453
Train Trench - Concept
104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
STM
E41FA
c433
2014 Drainage Improvements
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM
E4FC
c435
2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c436
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c459
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
SWR
E4GA
c441
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
c456
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
Revised 6/17/2016 Packet Pg. 84
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Proiect Title
IL
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
WTR
E4JB
c440
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
c460
2016 Water Comp Plan Updat
FAC
E4LA
c444
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
City Spray Park
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
Trackside Warning System
STIR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming
c463 2015 Overlay Program
WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays
2015 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
General
ENEV
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM
E5FA
c466
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
STM
E5FC
c472
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
STM
E5FE
c484
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
c469
2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
SWR
E5GB
s011
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modificatio
WTR
E5JA
c468
2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR
E51KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c476
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
i008
2016 Overlay ProgramJK A&
WTR
E6CB
i009
2016 Waterline Overlays
2016 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PM
E7MA
c276
Dayton Street Plaza
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
Revised 6/17/2016 Packet Pg. 85
4.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Title 19 Building and Fire Code Updates
Staff Lead: Leif Bjorback
Department: Development Services
Preparer: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
The 2015 International Codes, as amended by the State, become effective on July 1, 2016. This is a
regular update cycle that occurs every 3 years. These codes are contained in Title 19 ECDC. City Council
considered the proposed updates for this cycle at its June 7, 2016 public meeting and concurred to
move the ordinance adopting the updates to the Consent Calendar.
Staff Recommendation
Adoption of the ordinance by approving the Consent Calendar.
Narrative
The proposed revisions to ECDC Title 19 will adopt the 2015 codes along with the state amendments. In
addition, Edmonds -specific amendments are proposed to maintain alignment with the base codes which
have been updated and to simplify the format. No substantial changes are being proposed at this time.
Attachment A is the updated text of Title 19 in its entirety, showing underline and strike through.
Attachment B is the new ordinance "template", which provides the recitals for the text. Adoption of the
proposed ordinance would include both Attachments A and B.
In order to maintain compliance with state and local requirements, the City must adopt the proposed
ordinance prior to July 1, 2016.
Based on Council direction from June 7, the definition of "director" in the ordinance has been modified
slightly to match the definition used in the new critical area regulations. The revised language, shown in
Attachment A, does not change the meaning of the original definition. Also, minor changes were made
to the text of the ordinance to simplify the wording and format of IRC section 313 for residential fire
sprinklers, to provide for a more appropriate location within the IRC, and to provide correct references
for construction standards. (See ECDC 19.05.020B.) These changes are merely housekeeping and do not
alter the intent or impact of the code.
Attachments:
Title 19 attachment A
Title 19 Attachment B ordinance template
Packet Pg. 86
4.5.a
Title 19
BUILDING CODES
Chapters:
19.00
Building Code........................................................................................
3
19.05
Residential Building Code....................................................................
16
19.10
Building Permits — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas .....
17
19.15
Mechanical Code and Fuel Gas Code ...................................................
32
19.20
Plumbing Code......................................................................................
32
19.25
Fire Code...............................................................................................
33
19.30
Energy Code..........................................................................................
39
19.35
Repea'International Swimming Pool and Spa Code .........................
40
19.40
International Property Maintenance Code ............................................
40
19.45
International Code Council Performance Code ....................................
41
19.50
International Existing Building Code ...................................................
42
19.55
Electrical Code......................................................................................
42
19.60
Moving Buildings.................................................................................
43
19.65
Marinas.................................................................................................
45
19.70
Fees.......................................................................................................
47
19.75
Street Names and Address Numbering .................................................
48
19.80
Appeals.................................................................................................
50
19.85
Penalties................................................................................................
54
19.90
Limitation of Benefited and Protected Classes .....................................
54
19.95
Conversion Condominiums..................................................................
55
ATTACHMENT A 19-1
Packet Pg. 87
4.5.a
19.00.000
Chapter 19.00
BUILDING CODE
Sections:
19.00.000 Purpose.
19.00.005 Referenced codes.
19.00.010 Conflict between codes.
19.00.015 Administrative provisions.
19.00.020 International Building Code adopted.
19.00.025 International Building Code section amendments.
19.00.030 Architectural design review — Optional vesting.
19.00.040 Excluding nonconforming religious building from certain requirements.
19.00.000
Purpose.
The purpose of the codes and regulations adopted in this title is to provide minimum
standards to safeguard life, health, property and public welfare by regulating and controlling
the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location and maintenance
of all buildings and structures within the city of Edmonds. It is not the purpose or intent to
create or designate any particular class or group of persons to be especially protected or
benefited, nor is it intended to create any special relationship with any individual. [Ord.
3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010].
19.00.005
Referenced codes.
Where the following codes are referenced within any of the codes adopted and amended
in this title, they shall be substituted as follows:
A. "International Building Code" shall mean the building code as adopted and amended
in this title.
B. "International Residential Code" shall mean the residential building code as adopted
and amended in this title.
C. "International Mechanical Code" shall mean the mechanical code as adopted and
amended in this title.
D. "International Fuel Gas Code" shall mean the fuel gas code as adopted in Chapter
19.27 RCW and in accordance with the mechanical code as adopted and amended in this
title.
E. "International Fire Code" shall mean the fire code as adopted and amended in this title.
F. "Uniform Plumbing Code" shall mean the plumbing code as adopted and amended in
this title.
G. "Washington State Energy Code" shall mean the energy code as adopted and amended
in this title.
H. The "National Electrical Code" shall mean the electrical code as adopted and amended
in this title.
I. "International Existing Building Code" shall mean the existing building code as
adopted and amended in this title.
(Revised) 19-2
Packet Pg. 88
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 075
J. "International Property Maintenance Code" shall mean the property maintenance code
as adopted and amended in this title.
K. "International Code Council Performance Code" shall mean the performance code as
adopted and amended in this title.
L. "International Swimming Pool and Spa Code" shall mean the swimming pool and spa
code as adopted and amended in this title.
[Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010].
19.00.010
Conflict between codes.
In case of conflict among any of the codes referenced in ECDC 19.00.005 as adopted and
subsequently amended by this chapter, the first named code shall govern over those
following. In case of conflicts between other codes and provisions adopted by this chapter,
the code or provision that is most specific, as determined by the building official, shall
apply. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010].
19.00.015
Administrative provisions.
The administrative provisions contained in Chapter 1 of the International Building Code
as adopted and subsequently amended by this chapter shall be used as the general
administrative provisions for the codes listed in ECDC 19.00.005(A), (B), (C), (D) and (F),
unless otherwise required to meet the purpose of the code. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013;
Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010].
19.00.020
International Building Code adopted.
The International Building Code (IBC), 2n�2015 Edition, published by the
International Code Council, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council in
Chapter 51-50 WAC, and as subsequently amended by this chapter, is hereby adopted along
with Appendix Chapters E, G, H, I and J. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 1,
2010].
19.00.025
International Building Code section amendments.
The following sections of the IBC are hereby amended as follows:
A. Section 104.3, Notices and Orders, is amended to read:
The building official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance
with this code. The building official is also authorized to use Chapter 20.110 ECDC for
code compliance in addition to the remedies provided for in this code.
B. Section 105.1.1, Annual Permit, is deleted.
C. Section 105.1.1, Demolition Permits, is added and shall read:
Before the partial or complete demolition of any building or structure (interior or
exterior), a demolition permit shall be obtained from the building official. The
19-3 Packet Pg. 89
4.5.a
19.00.025
permit fee is established pursuant to Chapter 19.70 ECDC. The applicant shall also
post with the city, prior to permit issuance, a performance bond, or frozen fund,
conforming to Chapter 17.10 ECDC herein, in an amount to be determined by the
building official to satisfy all city requirements no later than 180 days after the
issuance of the permit. The demolition performance bond or frozen fund shall not be
released until the building official determines the following requirements have been
completed:1. Cap Abandoned Sanitary Sewers. Septic tanks shall be pumped, col-
lapsed and removed and/or filled with earth, sand, concrete, CDF or hard slurry.
2. Knock Down of Concrete Foundation Walls, Porches, Chimneys and Similar
Structures. Concrete, bricks, cobbles and boulders shall be broken to less than
12-inch diameter. Debris left on site shall conform to IBC Section 1804.2 for clean
fill.
3. Construction debris, vegetation, and garbage attributable to the demolition shall
be removed from the site and from unopened street right-of-way within 30 days of
written notice. No debris of any kind may be placed or maintained on street
right-of-way (including alleys) without a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 18.60 or
18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
4. Repair of any damage to, and restoration of, any public property to substantially
original conditions, i.e., alley, street, sidewalk, landscaping, water -meter, sewer,
storm and other utilities, rockeries, retaining walls, etc, in accordance with this code
and the City's engineering requirements.5. Grading of Site Back to Original To-
pography Grades. Basements shall be filled and compacted to 90 percent as verified
by a special inspector. "Structural fill" is defined as any fill placed below structures,
including slabs, where the fill soils need to support loads without unacceptable
deflections or shearing. Structural fill shall be clean and free draining, placed above
unyielding native site soils and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent modified
proctor, per ASTM D1557.
6. Temporary erosion control shall be installed and maintained per Chapter 18.30
ECDC.
D. Section 105.1.2, Annual permit records, is deleted.
E. Section 105.2, Work exempt from permit, is replaced as follows:
Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant
authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of
this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the applicant's
responsibility to comply with bulk zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 and
storm water management provisions per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be
required for the following unless required by the provisions of ECDC Title 23 or
limited or prohibited by the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC:
1. Building (general):
(Revised) 19-4
Packet Pg. 90
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 075
(a) One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds,
playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor area (measured teincluding the
exterior wall or post) does not exceed 120 square feet, with a maximum eave of
thirty (30) inches.
(b) Fences not over six (6) feet high; provided a permit is not required by Chapter
17.30 ECDC.
(c) Movable cases, counters and partitions not over five (5) feet nine (9) inches high.
(d) Retaining walls 4 feet (1,219 mm) in height or less measured vertically from the
finished grade at the exposed toe of the retaining wall to the highest point in the
wall, unless:
I Supporting a surcharge; or
II Impounding Class I, II, III -A liquids; or
III Subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
(e) Rockeries. Construction of rockeries is limited as specified elsewhere in this
rnr1P
(f) Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000
gallons and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed two (2) to one
(1).
(g) Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not
over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a
permit is not required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC.
(h) Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops and similar finish
work.
(i) Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery.
0) Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes.
(k) Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to an occupancy in which the pool
walls are entirely above the adjacent grade and the capacity does not exceed 5,000
gallons. Hot tubs and spas less than 5,000 gallons, completely supported by the
ground.
(1) Grading less than fifty (50) cubic yards (placed, removed or moved within any
365-day period) unless subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter
23.80 ECDC.
19-5 Packet Pg. 91
4.5.a
19.00.025
(m) Repair of appliances which do not alter original approval, certification, listing or
code.
(n) Replacement or adding new insulation with no drywall removal or placement.
(o) Replacement or repair of existing gutters or downspouts.
(p) The following types of signs are exempt from permit requirements except that
dimensional size and placement standards shall comply with Chapter 20.60 ECDC:
I. Replacing the panel on a previously permitted existing wall cabinet or pole sign,
II. Repainting an existing previously permitted wood sign,
III. Painted or vinyl lettering on storefront windows,
IV. Governmental signs, campaign signs, official public notices, and signs required
by provision of local, state, or federal law,
V. Temporary signs announcing the sale or rent of property and other temporary
signs as described in ECDC 20.60.080,
VI. Signs erected by the transportation authorities, and temporary seasonal and
holiday displays.
2. Mechanical:
(a) Portable heating, ventilation, cooling, cooking or clothes drying appliances.
(b) Replacement of any part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such
equipment unsafe.
(c) Portable fuel cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and
are not interconnected to a power grid.
(d) Steam, hot or chilled water piping within any heating or cooling equipment
regulated by this code.
(d) Portable evaporative cooler.
(f) Self-contained refrigeration systems containing ten (10) pounds or less of
refrigerant or that are actuated by motor of one (1) horsepower or less.
3. Plumbing:
(a) The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste or vent pipe, provided that the
replacement of defective material shall be done with new material and a permit
obtained and inspection made.
(Revised) 19-6
Packet Pg. 92
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 075
(b) Reinstallation or replacement of approved prefabricated plumbing fixtures that
do not involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves or pipes.
4. Residential permit exemptions:
In addition the following exemptions apply for single family dwellings:
(a) One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds,
playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor area (measured *^including the
exterior wall or post) does not exceed 200 square feet, with a maximum eave of
twelve (12) inches and maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. Vehicle storage
structures, such as garages and carports, are not exempted.
(b) Window awnings supported by an exterior wall and do not project more than
fifty-four (54) inches from the exterior wall and do not require additional support.
ECDC Title 23 provisions shall not apply to such awnings.
(c) Sport courts less than 2,000 square feet.
(d) Dock repair of individual decking members. ECDC Title 23 provisions shall not
apply.
(e) Replacement or repair of existing exterior siding. ECDC Title 23 provisions shall
not apply.
(f) Replacement or repair of existing windows or doors provided; no alteration of
structural members is required, the replacement would not require installation of
safety glazing, the installation does not involve required egress windows. ECDC
Title 23 provisions shall not apply.
(g) Minor like -for -like drywall repairs not involving fire -rated assemblies.
(h) Replacement or repair of individual decking, joists, stair treads, or intermediate
rails. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply.
(i) Uncovered platforms, decks, patios, not exceeding 200 square feet in area, that
are not more than thirty (30) inches above grade at any point and do not serve the
exit door required by IRC Section R311.4.
0) Canopies, as defined in ECDC 17.70.035, accessory to a single family dwelling,
with a floor area measured to the exterior wall or post not to exceed 200 square feet,
for covered storage, carport or similar use.
(k) Reroof overlays;_ Overlays are not permitted over slate, clay or cement tiles,
shake,material is wood ate,elayeemen4 or- asbestos fil i or where the existing
roof has two or more applications of any type of roofing.
19-7 Packet Pg. 93
4.5.a
19.00.025
F. Section 105.3.2, Time limitation of permit application, is amended to read:
1. Applications, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of
application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review
may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
2. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period
not exceeding 180 days prior to such expiration date.
3. No application shall be extended more than once for a total application life of 360
days except as allowed within this section. In order to renew action on an expired
application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on any
applicable code or ordinance change, and pay new plan review fees.
4. The Building Official may extend the life of an application if any of the following
conditions exist:
(a) Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act is in progress; or
(b) Any other City review is in progress; provided, the applicant has submitted a
complete response to City requests or the Building Official determines that unique
or unusual circumstances exist that warrant additional time for such response and the
Building Official determines that the review is proceeding in a timely manner to-
ward final City decision; or
(c) Litigation against the City or applicant is in progress, the outcome of which may
affect the validity or the provisions of any permit issued pursuant to such
application.
G. Section 105.3.3, Fully complete application, is added and reads:
In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant's
rights shall vest when a fully complete building permit application is filed. A fully
complete building permit application is an application executed by the owners of the
property for which the application is submitted or the duly authorized agent(s) for
such owners, containing each and every document required under the terms of these
ordinances and the IBC and is substantially complete in all respects. It is anticipated
that minor changes or revisions may be required and are frequently made in the
course of any building application review process, and such minor revisions or
changes shall not keep an application from being deemed complete if a good faith
attempt has been made to submit a substantially complete application containing all
required components. Where required, the application and supporting documents
shall be stamped and/or certified by the appropriate engineering, surveying or other
professional consultants. A fully complete building permit application shall be
accompanied by all required intake fees, including but not limited to plan review
fees required under the provisions of this chapter and code.
(Revised) 19-8
Packet Pg. 94
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 075
H. Section 105.3.4, Concurrent review, is added and reads:
An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request
plan review services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a
complete application for any necessary or required discretionary permit approval or
discretionary hearing; provided, that any building permit application submitted
concurrently with an application for discretionary permit or approvals shall not be
considered complete unless the applicant submits a signed statement, on a form
approved by the director, which acknowledges that the building permit application is
subject to any conditions or requirements imposed pursuant to the review and
approval of any necessary or required discretionary permit or approvals. The
applicant shall solely bear the risk of building permit submittal with discretionary
permit approval. If, after discretionary approval, the building permit plans are
modified or amended to comply with conditions or restrictions required by any
discretionary permit or approval, the applicant shall be solely responsible for any
and all costs which result therefrom, including but not limited to additional full plan
review fees; provided further, that any applicant -initiated changes made after the
original plan review is complete shall also require payment of full plan review fees.
I. Section 105.5, Permit expiration and extension, is amended to read:
1. Every permit issued under ECDC Title 19 shall expire by limitation 360 days
after issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.025I(2).
2. The following permits shall expire by limitation, 180 days after issuance and may
not be extended, unless they are associated with a primary building permit for a
larger construction project, in which case they may run with the life of the primary
permit:
Demolition permits;
Permits for Moving Buildings required by Chapter 19.60 ECDC;
Mechanical permits;
Tank removal, tank fill, or tank placement permits;
Grading, excavation and fill permits;
Water service line permits;
Plumbing permits;
Gas piping permits;
Deck and dock permits;
19-9 Packet Pg. 95
4.5.a
19.00.025
Fence permits;
Re -roof permits;
Retaining wall permits;
Swimming pool, hot tub and spa permits;
Sign permits;
Shoring permits;
Foundation permits.
3. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an
extension for an additional year. Provided there has been at least one (1) required
progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension,
the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one quarter the
original building permit fee to extend the permit.
4. If the applicant cannot complete work issued under an extended permit within a
total period of two (2) years, the applicant may request in writing, prior to the
second year expiration, an extension for a third and final year. Provided there has
been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by the city building
inspector after the previous extension prior- to the extension, the permit shall be
extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one quarter the original building
permit fee to extend the permit.
5. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be a
total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the
original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new
building permit shall be required, with full permit fees, in order for the applicant to
complete work. The voiding of the prior permit shall negate all previous vesting of
zoning or Building codes. Whenever an appeal is filed and a necessary development
approval is stayed in accordance with ECDC 20.07.004 the time limit periods im-
posed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision.
6. The building official may reject requests for permit extension where he
determines that modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and Building
codes have occurred since the original issuance of the permit and/or modifications or
amendments would significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the
project through the issuance of a new permit.
(Revised) 19-10
Packet Pg. 96
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 075
JJ. Repealed by Ord. 3926.
ILK. Section 107.3.3, Phased approval, is amended to read:
1. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction as part of a
development before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or
structure have been approved provided architectural design board approval has been
granted and a fully complete permit application for the entire building or structure
has been submitted for review.
2. Phased approval means permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be
issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager,
city engineer and fire marshal, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be
issued unless approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements
including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines,
sewer lines, and storm drainage have been signed as approved by the city engineer.
3. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city
pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city
standards for the improvements.
L. Seetion 108,Te}lper-afy Stmetttfes and Uses, rsdeleted
ML. Section 110.3.3, Lowest floor elevation, is amended to read:
In flood hazard areas, upon placement of the lowest floor, including the basement,
and prior to further vertical construction, the elevation certification required in
Section 1612.5 shall be submitted to the building official. Prior to final inspection
approval, the building official shall require an elevation certificate based on finished
construction prepared and sealed by a State licensed land surveyor.
NM. Section 113, Board of Appeals, is deleted and replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
ON. Section 501.2, Address Identification, is amended to read:
Approved numbers or addresses shall be installed by the property owner for new and
existing buildings in such a position as to be clearly visible and legible from the
street or roadway fronting the property. Letters or numbers on the building shall be a
minimum six (6) inches in height and stroke a minimum of .75 inch of a contrasting
color to the building base color. Where public or private access is provided and the
building address cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other
approved sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. This means of
premises identification does not preclude approved identification also affixed to
structure.
P-0. Section 1612.1.1, Residential Structures, is added and reads:
Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within
designated floodways, except for (i) repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a
structure which do not increase the ground floor area; and (ii) repairs, reconstruction
19-11 Packet Pg. 97
4.5.a
19.00.025
or improvements to a structure, the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the
market value of the structure either, (A) before the repair, or reconstruction is
started, or (B) if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the
damage occurred. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing
violations of State or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have
been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum
necessary to assure safe living conditions, or to structures identified as historic
places, may be excluded from the 50 percent calculation.
QP. Section 1612.4.1, Lowest Floor Elevation, is added and reads:
For buildings in all structure categories located in the Coastal High Hazard Areas
and Coastal A Flood Zones, the elevation of the lowest floor shall be a minimum of
two feet above the base flood elevation, as determined from the applicable FEMA
flood hazard map.
Q.Seetion 3103, rrv,Y,,, e-ary ct,.,,,,tufes, ;s deleted
RQ. Section 3108.1.1, Radio, television and cellular communication related equipment
and devices, is added and reads:
A permit shall be required for the installation or relocation of commercial radio,
television or cellular tower support structures including monopoles, whip antennas,
panel antennas, parabolic antennas and related accessory equipment, and accessory
equipment shelters (regardless of size) including roof mounted equipment shelters.
-SR. Section 3109.472, Applicability and maintenance, is amended to added and reads:
1. Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas of all occupancies shall comply with the
requirements of this section and other applicable sections of this code.
2. It is the responsibility of the owner to maintain a swimming pool, hot tub or spa in
a clean and sanitary condition and all equipment shall be maintained in a satisfactory
operating condition when the swimming pool, hot tub or spa is in use. A swimming
pool, hot tub or spa that is neglected, not secured from public entry and/or not main-
tained in a clean and sanitary condition or its equipment in accord with manu-
facturers recommendations shall be determined to be a hazard to health and safety
and shall be properly mitigated to the satisfaction of the building official.
T. Seetion 3109.3, PiAlie Swimming Pools, is .
U. T Seel o Z i no n Residential c.t.;,m.. ifig nook is deleted
VS. Section 3109.63, Location and Setbacks, is added and reads:
Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas shall meet requirements of the zoning code of
the city of Edmonds.
1. Minimum setbacks are measured from property lines to the inside face of the
pool, hot tub or spa as required by the zoning code for accessory structures.
(Revised) 19-12
Packet Pg. 98
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 075
2. All other accessory buildings and equipment shall meet the normally required
setbacks for accessory structures in the zone in which they are located.
WT. Section 3109.74, Tests and cross -connection devices, is added and reads:
1. All swimming pool, hot tub and spa piping shall be inspected and approved before
being covered or concealed.
2. Washington State Department of Health approved cross connection devices are
required to be provided on potable water systems when used to fill any swimming
pool, hot tub or spa.
XU. Section 3109.95, Wastewater disposal, is added and reads:
A means of disposal of the total contents of the swimming pool, hot tub or spa
(including partial or periodic emptying) shall be reviewed and approved by the
public works director.
1. No direct connection shall be made between any swimming pool, hot tub or spa to
any storm drain, city sewer main, drainage system, seepage pit, underground
leaching pit, or sub -soil drain.
2. A sanitary tee (outside cleanout installed on the main building side sewer line)
shall be provided for draining of treated water into the city sanitary sewer system.
YV. Section 3109.9, Inspection requirements, is added and reads:
The appropriate city inspector shall be notified for the following applicable in-
spections:
1. Footing, wall, pre -form, pre-gunite, erosion control, underground plumbing,
sanitary extension and cleanout, mechanical pool equipment, gas piping, mechanical
enclosure location, cross connection and final inspection.
2. An initial cross connection control installation inspection is required by the city
cross connection control specialist prior to final installation approval.
3. All backflow assemblies shall be tested by state certified backflow assembly
testers upon initial installation and then annually thereafter. Copies of all test reports
shall be submitted to the city water division for review and approval.
. MRM..7�19 ���r ���I�����l�l9 f.���l9l��RR�.�T)�AS.��iJ�il7��.. •..Z��[. p�f.lf
aw
S
-
Qan
,
19-13 Packet Pg. 99
4.5.a
19.00.030
rX
i
r
r
AAW. Appendix E, Accessibility Requirements, is amended by deleting Sections E107,
E108, El 10 and El 11.
BBX. Appendix G, Flood -Resistant Construction, is amended by addition of new section:
Section G301.1(4) Where base flood elevation data has not been provided or is not
available from another authoritative source, it shall be generated for subdivision
proposals and other proposed developments which contain at least 50 lots or 5 acres,
whichever is less.
GGY. Appendix H, Signs, is amended as follows:
1. Section H101.2, Signs exempt from permits, is replaced by subsection (E)(1)(p) of
this section.
2. Section H101.2.1, Prohibited signs, is added and reads as follows:
a. It is unlawful for any person to advertise or display any visually communicated
message, by letter or pictorially, of any kind on any seating bench, or in direct
connection with any bench.
b. All signs not expressly permitted by Chapter 20.60 ECDC.
c. Signs which the city engineer determines to be a hazard to vehicle or pedestrian
traffic because they resemble or obscure a traffic control device, or pose a hazard to
a pedestrian walkway or because they obscure visibility needed for safe traffic
passage. Such signs shall be immediately removed at the request of the city
engineer.
d. All signs which are located within a public right-of-way and that have been
improperly posted or displayed are hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall
be subject to immediate removal and confiscation per ECDC 20.60.090.
3. Sections H104, Identification, H106.1.1, Internally illuminated signs, H107,
Combustible materials, H108, Animated devices, H109.1, Height restrictions, and H110,
Roof signs, are deleted. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3845 § 6, 2011; Ord. 3796 § 1,
2010].
19.00.030
Architectural design review — Optional vesting.
In addition to the vesting rights created by RCW 19.27.095 and ECDC 19.00.015, an
applicant for development as defined in ECDC 20.10.010 and subject to architectural design
(Revised) 19-14
Packet Pg. 100
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 "0
board (ADB) review may, at the applicant's option, file a fully complete augmented archi-
tectural design review application (hereinafter "augmented ADB application") and vest
rights including applicable permit, development and impact fees under the provisions of the
ECDC and the State Building Code as adopted and amended by the city of Edmonds, this
title as then in effect, to, but only to, the extent that the application provides full and
detailed information necessary to confirm the particular regulation to be vested. The burden
is on the applicant to provide such detail.
A. A fully complete, augmented application for architectural design review shall consist
of a complete application for architectural design review, executed by each and every
property owner of record of the development site or their duly authorized agent(s), accom-
panied by the following:
1. All fees required by ordinance, including impact mitigation fees, to be deposited at
the time such State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements become final.
2. A site plan showing the current zoning of the development site, the footprint of all
proposed structures, the total square footage and use of each floor, all setbacks required by
either the zoning code or State Building Codes, proposed parking configurations, and exits.
3. Elevation drawings showing the original grade of the site, any proposed alterations
to grade, the proposed height of the structure and the number of stories.
4. A letter executed by all owners of record or their duly authorized agent(s) detailing
the proposed use in sufficient detail to determine whether the proposed use complies with
the zoning code then in effect and with the building code then in effect to determine type of
construction and occupancy classifications of the IBC and IFC as those codes then in effect.
5. A building permit application, as described in IBC Section 105.3 as the same exists
or is hereafter amended, and all building permit and plan review fees as established and set
forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC; provided, that the plans required by IBC Section 107, as the
same exists or is hereafter amended, and other engineering documents, plans or drawings
required by ECDC Title 18 may be submitted within 90 days of final ADB approval, or
final approval on appeal.
B. Upon filing of the augmented ADB application, the applicant shall be deemed fully
vested as if a fully complete building permit application had been filed; provided:
1. The burden shall be upon the applicant to supply all material required by the pro-
visions of this section and as necessary to meet the requirements of Chapter 20.10 ECDC.
The applicant may supplement the original application in the event an application is deemed
incomplete by the development services director or designee. Vesting shall occur only when
the application is deemed complete by the development services director. Failure to sup-
plement an incomplete application within 90 days of final ADB approval shall result in for-
feiture of all fees paid and no vesting right shall attach.
2. The application shall expire along with all rights vested 180 days following the date
of application if final architectural design approval is not received.
a. The development services director or designee may issue an extension for an
additional period, not exceeding 180 days, upon written request by the applicant(s) or their
agent(s). Such request for extension shall be filed prior to the expiration of the original
application time period. An extension shall be granted if the architectural design board has
not yet considered the application or an appeal thereof is pending.
b. The time period shall run concurrently with the periods established by ECDC
19.00.025 as the same exists or is hereafter amended. No application shall be extended more
19-15 Packet Pg. 101
4.5.a
19.00.040
than once. In order to renew an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit all
required information and pay a new plan review fee.
3. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of state law and regulation and this
code regarding SEPA review. Review periods or delays occasioned by SEPA shall stay the
time periods set by this chapter.
4. Following final ADB approval, the applicant shall file the plans and information
required by IBC Section 107. It is anticipated that minor adjustments and changes may be
and are usually required to the plans submitted as a result of the plan review and administra-
tive process; provided, that the following changes shall not be considered "minor" and shall
forfeit vesting rights, and shall require the filing of a new application:
a. Any substantial change not required by the terms of ADB approval.
b. Any increase in height or total square footage or any change which would
change the occupancy classification for the purposes of the State Building Code.
5. Any decision of the city staff regarding the application stated in this section and its
interpretation shall be considered a Type I decision appealable only to the superior court of
Snohomish County by Land Use Petition Act.
C. The rights vested by ECDC 19.00.025(G) (Section 105.3.3 of IBC as amended) and
this section refer only to zoning and building code rights protected by RCW 19.27.095.
D. These sections shall not be interpreted to create vesting rights not protected by RCW
19.27.095 and shall not be interpreted as a further limitation on the administrative obliga-
tions and legislative powers of the city. By way of illustration and not limitation, this
chapter does not limit:
1. The city council's authority to create local improvement districts.
2. The city council's authority to legislate life safety requirements that are not required
to recognize existing vested rights.
3. Environmental and shorelines review and mitigation procedures. [Ord. 3926 § 1
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010].
19.00.040
Excluding nonconforming religious building from certain requirements.
Existing legal nonconforming churches, synagogues, mosques and other buildings used
for religious observance (hereinafter "church" or "churches") are hereby excluded from any
requirement of the State Building Code which would be triggered by a change of use as spe-
cifically limited and set forth herein:
A. This change in use exclusion is limited solely to a change in use for the provision of
emergency housing to the homeless and other indigent persons. The term "emergency" shall
mean the housing of indigent and homeless persons when the ambient temperature is fore-
cast by the National Weather Service to be below 33 degrees for a four-hour overnight
period or when wind chill, violent storms or other inclement conditions present a direct
threat to the lives of homeless and other indigent persons without shelter. Such danger could
include, but is not limited to, the threat presented by carbon monoxide poisoning for persons
attempting to take shelter in cars or other vehicles with the motor running.
B. In order to claim this exclusion, a church shall:
1. Be a legal nonconforming structure prior to the provision of emergency housing for
the homeless and indigent. In the alternative, a church may establish that it has previously
(Revised) 19-16
Packet Pg. 102
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.00 0110
provided overnight housing to members of its congregation or the public in emergencies, for
educational, religious or other purposes.
2. Maintain a "fire watch." The term "fire watch" shall mean the maintenance during
all times when indigent housing services are provided of a watch by paid staff or volunteers
who shall, on premises, monitor for fires or violations of no smoking prohibitions. At least
one fire monitor shall be provided for each eight persons housed.
3. Provide an operational smoke detection system.
4. Prohibit the smoking of tobacco or similar products on the premises and prohibit the
use of any open flame in the area in which the homeless or indigent persons are temporarily
housed.
5. Maintain clear and unobstructed means of egress. Exits must not be locked in the
direction of egress unless a special egress control device is installed in accordance with the
building code.
C. The application of this exclusion is intended to fulfill the city's obligation to provide
flexibility and consider reasonable alternatives in the application of the rigid requirements
of the State Building Code. The building official is directed to avoid technical inflexibility,
to consider the use of any reasonable alternative which would provide the minimum o,
protections required either under the State Building Code or this exclusion and to be flexible
when considering alternative approaches to the specific requirements set forth above. All
decisions by the building official shall be in writing and articulate the public interest to be Ln
served as well as an analysis of the alternatives. M
D. These provisions are for the purpose of providing for and promoting the health, safety a
and welfare of the general public. See Chapter 19.90 ECDC, Limitation of Benefited and
Protected Classes. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010].
19-17 Packet Pg. 103
4.5.a
19.05.000
Chapter 19.05
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE
Sections:
19.05.000
International Residential Code adopted.
19.05.010
Chapter 1 not adopted.
19.05.015
Other chapters not adopted.
19.05.020
Section amendments.
19.05.030
Manufactured home installation standards.
19.05.000
International Residential Code adopted.
The International Residential Code (IRC), 2012 2015 Edition, published by the
International Code Council, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council in
Chapter 51-51 WAC, and as subsequently amended by this chapter, is hereby adopted along
with Appendix Chapters A, B, C, F G� n K_ d [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013;
Ord. 3819 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3796 § 2, 2010].
19.05.010
Chapter 1 not adopted.
Chapter 1 is not adopted, except as provided for in ECDC 19.00.015. [Ord. 3926 § 1
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 2, 2010].
19.05.015
Other chapters not adopted.
Chapters 11, 20 and 21, and Part VII, Plumbing, and Part VIII, Electrical, are not
adopted. See Chapter 19.20 ECDC for adopted plumbing code and Chapter 19.55 ECDC for
adopted electrical code. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013].
19.05.020
Section amendments.
The following sections of the IRC are hereby amended as follows:
A. Table R301.2(1), Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria, is amended with the
following criteria:
1. Ground Snow Load = 25 psf non -reducible
2. Wind Speed(d) = 85 mph
3. Topographical effects(k) No
4. Seismic Design Category(f) = DI
5. Weathering(a) = moderate
(Revised) 19-18
Packet Pg. 104
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.05 AN)
6. Frost Line Depth(b) = 18 inches
7. Termite(c) = slight to moderate
8. Winter Design Temp(e) = 27 degrees F
9. Flood Hazard(g) = NFIP adoption 3/26/74. FIRM maps 11/8/99
10. Ice Shield Underlayment(h) = not required
11. Air Freezing Index(i) = 0-1000
12. Mean Annual Tempo) = 50 degrees F
B. R313.1 Automatic fire sprinkler system, is added and reads:
1. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in new buildings
containingfive ive (5) or more attached dwelling units. Refer to ECDC 19.25.035.
2. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in new one -family
and two-family dwellings and townhouses exceeding 3,000 square feet of fire area.
[Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3819 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3796 § 2, 20101.
3. The design and installation of residential fire sprinkler systems shall be in
accordance with NFPA 13D.
C. R322.1 General, is hereby amended as follows:
Buildings and structures constructed in whole or in part in flood hazard areas
(including A or V Zones) as established in Table R301.2(1) shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the provisions contained in this section.
Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within
designated floodways, except for (i) repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a
structure which do not increase the ground floor area; and (ii) repairs, reconstruction
or improvements to a structure, the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the
market value of the structure either, (A) before the repair, or reconstruction is
started, or (B) if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the
damage occurred. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing
violations of State or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have
been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum
necessary to assure safe living conditions, or to structures identified as historic
places, may be excluded from the 50 percent calculation.
a�
a
rn
as
W
P
LO
N
M
19-19 Packet Pg. 105
4.5.a
19.05.030
I
19.05.030
Manufactured home installation standards.
A. Permit Regulations.
1. Chapter 296-150M WAC, as currently promulgated together with any future
amendments thereof, or future additions thereto, is hereby adopted. The building official is
authorized to issue building permits and collect permit fees for the installation of all
manufactured homes that meet the requirements of this chapter, to inspect the installation of
manufactured homes, and enforce all violations of this chapter.
2. All references to "installation permits" in Chapter 296-150M WAC, as herein
adopted by reference, shall refer to building permits issued for the installation of manufac-
tured homes.
3. Fees for the installation of a manufactured home shall be set forth in Chapter 19.70
ECDC. All other applicable development fees shall also be imposed as with any other
single-family residence.
4. Mobile homes shall be permitted only within designated mobile home parks.
5. Pursuant to added RCW 35.21.897, 35A.21.310, 36.01.220, and amended RCW
35.63.160 and 1998 c 239 s 1, homes built to 42 USC Sections 5401 through 5403 standards
(as amended in 2000) shall be regulated for the purposes of siting, in the same manner as
site -built homes, factory -built homes, or homes built to any other approved state
construction.
6. Manufactured homes to be placed within the city shall not be older than three cal-
endar years from the date of complete permit application submittal. The applicant is
required to provide the vehicle identification number (VIN) information.
7. All spaces measured from the underside of the home to finished grade shall be
enclosed with a decorative skirting.
8. Manufactured homes shall be thermally equivalent to the current State Energy
Code.
9. The minimum manufactured home size shall be at least two fully enclosed parallel
sections each not less than 12 feet wide by 36 feet long.
10. Coated metal, tin, or vinyl roofing material is not permitted.
11. Manufactured homes shall comply with all other development standards of this
code. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 2, 2010].
(Revised) 19-20
Packet Pg. 106
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.1000()
Chapter 19.10
BUILDING PERMITS — EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD
AREAS
Sections:
19.10.000 Statement of purpose and application.
19.10.010 Section amendments.
19.10.020 Definitions.
19.10.030 Minimum required application submittals.
19.10.040 Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers.
19.10.050 Site bonds and contractor general public liability insurance.
19.10.060 Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available
science.
19.10.070 Issuance and denial of permits.
19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection, monitoring during construction
and final geotechnical report.
19.10.000
Statement of purpose and application.
A. This chapter has been enacted in order to provide both substantive and procedural
provisions relating to the issuance of permits within designated earth subsidence and
landslide hazard areas of the city. It shall be the policy of the city that no permit shall be
issued for any site which is found to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep
slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography for the
particular permit requested for issuance. When development occurs on an unstable site, an
unreasonable risk of danger may exist to the public, to public improvements or to adjacent
property owners. If such a site can be stabilized through the construction of on -site
improvements, that risk may be reduced.
B. The construction of professionally designed structures addressing the risks of earth
movement, and employing feasible attendant measures (including but not limited to
drainage improvements, specially designed foundations, retaining walls, removal of over-
burden and other improvements designed to minimize the risk of earth movement, prevent
avoidable damage to structures, safeguard adjacent properties, limit risk to inhabitants, and
to stabilize the structure in the event of movement) may mitigate and reduce the risk of
earth movement on individual properties. Nothing herein shall relieve an owner of any
obligation imposed by the State Building Code or city ordinance to take all reasonable and
practical measures available to reduce or eliminate the risk or hazard.
C. The IRC/IBC, as promulgated by the state of Washington and required to be adopted
by the city, does not specify a standard regarding lot stability. Since the city's request for an
interpretation of the International Building Code by the State Building Code Council to
designate an acceptable level of lot stability was denied, and because the city wishes to
comply with state law requiring that the issuance of building permits be a ministerial and
not a discretionary act, the provisions of this chapter have been adopted in order to provide
reasonable certainty in the permit issuance process. The purpose of these provisions is not
19-21 Packet Pg. 107
4.5.a
19.10.010
to lessen the minimum requirements of the current adopted building code, but rather to
define its requirements for city implementation.
D. These provisions have been adopted in order to establish a policy that permits shall not
be issued for any site where a substantial risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard exist
unless:
1. The risks can be defined with reasonable scientific certainty and found to be within
acceptable limits as determined in accordance with this chapter.
2. Any hazard associated with the site is scientifically ascertained and fully disclosed
through the permit process.
3. Notice of any risk is given to future purchasers through the land records of Sno-
homish County.
4. Any risks associated with construction and habitation are assumed by the builder
and future owners of the site.
5. Adequate indemnification is provided by the builder, and the owner, of the site in
order that the general public not assume or bear any portion of the costs or liability associ-
ated with the builder's investigation, design and construction as well as the continuing
maintenance of the site by the property owner.
E. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this chapter or the IRC/IBC, all
applications for permits received for any site, any portion of which lies within an earth
subsidence and landslide hazard area, shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter. In
addition to all other requirements of these sections, the restrictions and provisions of this
chapter shall apply to all building, grading, fill and excavation permits (herein "permits").
Minor permits such as plumbing, mechanical, re -roof and interior alterations are exempt
from the requirements of this chapter.
F. All applications for permits under this chapter shall disclose within the geotechnical
report whether or not any part of the site lies within or adjacent to an earth subsidence and
landslide hazard area or within a critical area as defined by the city's environmentally criti-
cal areas title. The building official may require preliminary investigation by a geotechnical
engineer for any applicant whose property lies within or lies adjacent to a known earth
subsidence landslide hazard area, or within a known hazard area, or areas with steep slopes
or unusual topography or which has a history of earth movement in order to assist the
building official in determining whether these provisions should be applied.
G. Nothing in this chapter should or shall be interpreted to guarantee issuance of a permit
with respect to any property unless the requirements of the IRC/IBC as amended and
interpreted by this chapter have been met. [Ord. 3926 § I (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1,
2007].
19.10.010
Section amendments.
The provisions of this section amend the 2003 Edition of the IRC/IBC and all subsequent
revisions adopted by RCW 19.27.031 as the State Building Code as previously amended by
Chapter 19.05 ECDC. All prior substantive amendments have received the approval of the
State Building Code Council. All provisions of the IRC/IBC which conflict with this
chapter shall be deemed amended hereby, and any ambiguity created shall be resolved in
favor of the specific provision or general intent of said chapter. In addition to the
amendments of the IRC/IBC by its alteration, improvement and correction to incorporate
(Revised) 19-22
Packet Pg. 108
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10 nlQ
the chapter, the following specific code provisions are amended and the substantive and
procedural requirements of this chapter are amended by the correction and alteration of the
following sections of the IRC/IBC:
A. Chapter 1, Administration.
1. Section R105.1.1 Permit review applicability. Any permit requested for a site
lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as
defined by ECDC 19.10.020(F) shall be processed and acted upon in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC.
2. Section R105.2 Work exempt from a permit. ECDC 19.00.025(E)(1) exemptions
(a), (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), 0), (k), (m), and (p) and ECDC 19.00.025E(4) exemptions
(a), (c), (h) and (i) shall not apply in any area designated as an earth subsidence and
landslide hazard area as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(F).
3. Section R105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application.
a. Applications, for which no permit is issued within two (2) years following the
date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for
review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building
official.
b. The building official may not extend the time for action by the applicant on an
expired application. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant
shall submit a new application, revised plans based on current adopted codes and
pay new plan review fees as well as any outstanding peer review fees incurred to
date.
4. Section R105.5 Permit expiration and extension.
a. Every permit issued under the provisions and development standards of Chapter
19.10 ECDC shall expire by limitation two (2) years after issuance, except as
provided in ECDC 19.10.010(A)(4)(b).
b. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an
extension for a third and final year. If the plans and specifications for the permit
extension application are the same as the plans and specifications submitted for the
original permit application and provided there has been at least one (1) required
progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension,
the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one quarter the
original building permit fee to extend the permit.
c. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be a
total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the
original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new
building permit shall be required, with full fees, in order for the applicant to
19-23 Packet Pg. 109
4.5.a
19.10.010
complete work. The issuance of a new permit shall negate all previous vesting of
zoning or building codes. Whenever an appeal is filed and a necessary development
approval is stayed in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, the time limit
periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision.
d. The building official shall reject requests for permit extensions if modifications or
amendments to the applicable zoning and building codes have occurred since the
original issuance of the permit, and modifications or amendments would
significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the project through the
issuance of a new permit.
5. Section R105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit.
a. In order to recommence work on an expired permit, a new permit application with
full fees shall be submitted to the building official.
b. New permit applications shall be reviewed under current zoning and building
codes in effect at the time of complete application submittal. If a new permit is
sought to recommence work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested
under the codes in effect at the time of complete application for the new permit, not
the expired permit. When additional plan review is required, plan review fees shall
be charged. When applicable, peer review and peer review fees shall be assessed.
6. Section R106.3.3.1 Phased approval.
a. The building official may require sequencing of construction phases or activities
such as the installation of shoring or temporary erosion control remedies and/or
drainage systems, well in advance of grading or foundation construction on a time
frame consistent with geotechnical recommendations and peer review. As part of the
sequencing process, the building official may impose permit conditions that address
site work sequencing to include but not be limited to: limiting all excavation,
drainage systems and foundation installation to the drier season between May 1st
and September 30th.
b. When permit conditions such as groundwork are limited by the building official
on a particular project, the applicant's geotechnical engineer may submit a letter
detailing geotechnical recommendations that portions of work may progress. The
letter shall include a detailed work schedule submitted by the general contractor
specifying work to be done, timeline, provisions for monitoring and equipment to be
used. Any such recommendation shall be based upon best available science and be
consistent with standard geotechnical engineering practice. The building official
may require a peer review prior to a decision which provides concurrence regarding
at least the following issues:
i. Duration of work,
ii. Type of equipment to use,
(Revised) 19-24
Packet Pg. 110
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10070
iii. Additional temporary erosion and sediment control provisions required, and
iv. Applicability of special inspections, and similar issues.
c. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction before the
entire plans and specifications for the whole building or structure have been
approved provided peer review approval has been granted. Phased approval means
separate permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be issued separately,
provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city engineer, and
city public works director, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be is-
sued unless approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements
(including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines,
sewer lines, and storm drainage) have been signed as approved by the city engineer.
With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pur-
suant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city
standards for the improvements.
B. Chapter 2, Definitions.
1. Section R202 and IBC 202 are hereby amended to include the definitions set forth
in ECDC 19.10.020, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
C. Chapter 4, Foundations.
1. Section R401.1 General Exception 3. Any permit requested for a site lying in
whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area shall be
processed and acted upon in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10
ECDC.
D. IBC Chapter 16, Structural design.
1. Section IBC 1601.1.1 Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter 19.10
ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
E. IBC Appendix J, Grading.
1. Section IBC Appendix J 101.1.2, Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter
19.10 ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
[Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.10.020
Definitions.
The following terms, when used within this chapter, shall have the following definitions:
A. "Architect" shall mean a person licensed to practice architecture by the state of Wash-
ington.
19-25 Packet Pg. 111
4.5.a
19.10.020
B. "Best available science" shall be determined in accordance with the criteria estab-
lished in WAC 365-195-900, et seq.
C. "Bluff' shall mean any slope 10 feet in height or greater inclined at greater than one
unit vertical in one unit horizontal or 100 percent slope.
D. "Building official" shall mean the building official of the city of Edmonds.
E. "Director" shall mean the dire t r of development serviees as well as any author-iz
representative of the dir-eetaF. the city of Edmonds development services director or his/her
designee.
F. "Earth subsidence and landslide hazard area" shall mean any area of the city which, by
reason of excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, stability or topogra-
phy, has a risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard in excess of normal allowances.
The earth subsidence and landslide hazard area is a subcategory of "landslide hazard area"
(a geologically hazardous area) as defined in city of Edmonds environmentally critical areas
title (ECDC Title 23). The hazard area designated as the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence
Landslide Hazard Area in the 2007 report of Landau Associates and as may be amended in
future adopted earth subsidence and landslide hazard maps are hereby incorporated by this
reference and made a part of this chapter as fully as if herein set forth and may be provided
in a summary text form. Future adopted landslide hazard maps shall be incorporated by
reference upon adoption by ordinance.
Areas designated on the adopted North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard
Areas Map, or any future adopted landslide hazard map, as having a risk of earth subsidence
or landslide hazard, areas with slopes as designated in ECDC 23.80.020, areas which
exhibit geologic characteristics of earth movement, or any other area identified as having a
history of earth movement shall be presumed to have such risk and shall be considered to be
an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. Applicants for permits in such areas shall
submit a geotechnical report and complete plan set submittal as required by this chapter to
the building official for review.
The presumption of risk shall be rebuttable and the decision of the director or building
official that any area lies within, or adjacent to, such earth subsidence and landslide hazard
area shall be appealable as a staff decision to superior court in accordance with the Land
Use Petition Act.
Copies of the reports and maps shall be maintained in the offices of the building official
and shall be available for inspection during all normal working hours. Individual copies of
the reports and map may be obtained by the public upon the payment of the cost of
reproduction.
G. "General contractor" shall mean a bonded, insured and registered contractor in the
state of Washington. A general contractor shall maintain state -required bonding and shall
carry general public liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000. The general
contractor shall have a current valid state contractor's license with the state of Washington
and a city of Edmonds resident or nonresident business license, whichever is applicable.
H. "Geologist" means a practicing geologist licensed in the state of Washington with at
least four years' experience as a licensed geologist in responsible charge, including experi-
ence with landslide evaluation.
I. "Geotechnical engineer" means a practicing geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a
professional civil engineer in the state of Washington who has at least four years of pro -
(Revised) 19-26
Packet Pg. 112
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10 mQ
fessional employment as a geotechnical engineer in responsible charge, including
experience with landslide evaluation.
J. "Landslide hazard areas" means areas mapped or otherwise defined by the city of
Edmonds as environmental critical areas or geologically hazardous areas.
K. "Land surveyor" means a person who holds a Washington State land surveyor's
license.
L. "Lead design professional" means the person designated by the applicant to oversee
and coordinate the permit review process on behalf of the applicant.
M. "Plan set submittal" means a complete application pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015
including:
1. Vicinity map.
2. Topography map and survey.
3. Civil plans including grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm drain-
age, utilities and site improvements.
4. Tree cutting/land clearing plans.
5. Geotechnical report.
6. Architectural and structural plans with design calculations, stamped and signed by
licensed design professionals of the state of Washington.
N. "Site" means the entire area within the boundaries, as described in a legal description,
of the property that is to be developed under the permit for which the applicant has applied.
O. "Stable" shall mean that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adja-
cent properties, from soil instability is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the
reports developed under the requirements of ECDC 19.10.030 and the proposed
development will not increase the potential for soil movement.
In the event that any site has an underlying risk of movement based upon deep-seated
earth movement or large-scale earth failure which is not susceptible to correction by on -site
improvements, such hazard shall not render a site proposed for single-family residences to
be presumed unstable for the purpose of this provision if the geotechnical engineer of record
and recommendation of any peer reviewer confirm the risk of probability of earth
movement is 30 percent or less within a 25-year period.
In order to meet the definition of "stable" the geotechnical report shall include identified
hazards for the property and the mitigation measures proposed to reduce or correct the
hazards along with measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining
hazards, including all on- and off -site measures taken to correct or reduce the risk. These
shall be fully disclosed to the applicant and future owners, heirs and assigns in the covenant
required to be executed in accordance with provisions of this chapter, in which case the
defined risk may be approved as an acceptable condition.
P. "Steep slope" shall be defined and calculated pursuant to Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
Q. "Storm event" means one inch or greater precipitation in a 24-hour period as reported
by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
R. "Structural engineer" means a person licensed to practice structural engineering by the
state of Washington.
S. "Structural fill" shall mean any fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the
fill soils are intended to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing.
Structural fill should be clean and free -draining and should be placed above unyielding
19-27 Packet Pg. 113
4.5.a
19.10.030
native site soils compacted in accordance with an approved geotechnical report prepared
utilizing best engineering science. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.10.030
Minimum required application submittals.
A. The applicant shall submit a complete plan set submittal and permit application and
specifications for the proposed development as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(M) and this
chapter.
B. An earth subsidence and landslide hazard area permit submittal checklist shall be ad-
opted at the direction of the director and shall be provided to all persons inquiring regarding
building permit applications or development permits in the designated earth subsidence and
landslide hazard area of North Edmonds. The submittal checklist shall include but not be
limited to the requirements contained in city public handouts, written policies, adopted
maps, reference maps, summary reports, minimum geotechnical report guidelines, and the
following:
1. North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Map.
2. Vicinity map.
3. Topographic map and survey.
4. Civil plans (i.e., grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm drainage,
utilities and site improvements).
5. Tree cutting/land clearing plan.
6. Geotechnical report.
7. Owner and professional declarations.
8. Detailed architectural and structural plans with structural calculations and specifi-
cations.
9. Bonds, covenants and contractor public liability insurance in accordance with the
detailed requirements stated below.
If any item in the checklist is inapplicable to a particular project, a letter or a report shall
be provided to the director stamped by the appropriate licensed design professional, with
sufficient information or data to demonstrate why the item is inapplicable. The director may
utilize appropriate licensed consultants to determine if generally accepted engineering
practice requires submission of an application requirement. When consultants are used to
determine if generally accepted engineering practice requires submission of an application
requirement, the cost of review shall be paid by the applicant.
C. A copy of the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Map shall be
included in the submittal checklist materials.
D. The vicinity map shall be suitable for locating the site and include information related
to existing conditions on or near the site, based on the topographic map and survey and shall
designate all known landslide masses, or debris flows or mud flows on or near the site
which could threaten proposed structures within 100 feet, as referenced, noted, described or
discussed in the geotechnical report.
E. The applicant shall submit a topographic map and survey prepared and stamped by a
licensed land surveyor, prior to studies and evaluations by the geotechnical engineer, and
shall show:
1. Map scale, north arrow, legal description, tax account parcel numbers, easements,
and lot property lines.
(Revised) 19-28
Packet Pg. 114
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10 "0
2. Existing grade contour lines, at two -foot intervals.
3. All distances between existing structures on the site and approximate distances of
existing habitable structures on adjacent sites within 50 feet of property lines (all adjacent
sites which could affect or be affected by the proposed development shall be shown).
4. Lowest footing or basement slab elevation of existing and proposed structures on
the property and on adjacent properties to the extent that such information is reasonably
available, and proposed finish floor elevations.
5. The location of existing sanitary sewers, stormwater drainage facilities, septic tanks,
drain fields, wells, piezometers, private drainage systems, underground storage tanks,
subsurface drains, and other sewer/drainage facility components on, and adjacent to, the site
to the extent such information is reasonably available.
6. The location of all existing underground utilities on, and adjacent to, the site
including, but not limited to, telephone, cable television, gas, electric and water utilities,
vaults, fire hydrants and other cables, wires, meters and drainage pipes to the extent that
such information is available.
7. A separate topographical drawing shall be submitted showing proposed grade
contours at two -foot intervals. This drawing shall include the bottom of proposed footing
elevations including all stepped footing elevations.
F. Civil -engineered plans shall be prepared and stamped by a state of Washington
licensed civil engineer pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.30 ECDC and current
adopted city stormwater manual. Geotechnical report recommendations affecting civil plans
shall be incorporated into the design and detailed on the plans and shall include:
1. Storm drainage plan with storm drainage calculations.
2. Provisions for building pad and foundation drainage.
3. Temporary erosion and sediment control with drainage and maintenance provisions,
and/or other sediment control assemblies.
4. Permanent erosion control with drainage and maintenance provisions.
5. Fill/soil stockpile limitation provisions, specific location, height, protection and
maintenance.
6. Slope protection plans, rockeries, retaining walls, ecology blocks, keystone block
walls, soldier pile walls, and soil nail walls.
7. Utilities and site improvements.
8. Grading plans, temporary and permanent shoring plans, top and toe of slope set-
backs, driveway slope.
G. In lieu of the procedural requirements of Chapter 18.45 ECDC, a tree cutting/land
clearing plan shall be submitted when significant trees are proposed to be removed. A
significant tree is a tree with a trunk diameter of six inches or greater measured four feet
from the ground. No significant tree shall be removed until the permit is approved.
A detailed landscape plan may also be required in order for the city to evaluate long-term
erosion control measures. The plan shall comply with all requirements of the ECDC relating
to tree clearing and critical areas review, if applicable. The director may require the project
geotechnical engineer's concurrence regarding an approval of a tree cutting/land clearing
plan when slope stability is at issue.
H. Included in the permit submittal checklist shall be general and specific soils and geo-
technical information, details or analysis required pursuant to IBC 1802. The applicant shall
19-29 Packet Pg. 115
4.5.a
19.10.030
retain a geotechnical engineer to prepare a report and evaluation of the subsurface soil
conditions on the site to include:
1. The geotechnical report shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices, under the supervision of, and signed and stamped by,
the geotechnical engineer. A geologist may be required to be part of the geotechnical
consulting staff. The report shall reference the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007)
as a technical document reviewed as part of the geologic analysis for the project and discuss
all items listed in the permit submittal checklist and shall make specific recommendations
concerning development of the site.
2. The opinions and recommendations contained in the geotechnical report shall be
supported by field observations and, where appropriate or applicable, by literature review,
conducted by the geotechnical engineer. The report shall be based on best available science.
3. The report shall include an analysis of material gathered through appropriate
explorations, such as borings or test pits to a minimum depth of six feet below the proposed
lowest footing or pile, an analysis of soil characteristics conducted by or under the
supervision of the engineer in accordance with the standards adopted by the American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other applicable standards. The report must
provide subsurface data to support the engineer's conclusions regarding slope stability.
4. If the evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the report shall be
reviewed and approved by a geologist. It shall be the responsibility of the geotechnical
engineer to assure that the geologist meets the qualifications listed in ECDC 19.10.020. A
letter of concurrence from the geologist shall be included in the report.
5. Based upon the North Edmonds Landslide Area Geology and Slide Mechanisms
map and table found in the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007), any lot which
contains any portion of any hazard zone or is adjacent thereto (regardless of whether the
proposed building pad is located within any hazard area) shall specifically consider within
the geotechnical report the following types of typical hazard zones and shall specifically
note if the hazard is, or is not, present on the site. The report shall address hazards from
encroaching landslide materials, hazards from ground failure in material that has not previ-
ously failed, and hazards from ground failure in previously failed material. For each land-
slide hazard identified on a property, the geotechnical engineer shall identify the types of
specific processes associated with the hazard and include design features to reduce such
hazards and mitigate impacts.
6. For properties containing or adjacent to bluffs, the geotechnical engineer shall, as a
part of the building permit process, provide analysis of the rate of retreat of the bluff pre-
pared by a geologist and estimate the bluff retreat amount and regression rate for periods of
25 and 125 years. The geotechnical engineer shall address the effects of bluff retreat on the
stability of structures and/or improvements. A "structure" is defined as:
a. A building intended for human habitation,
b. A building, structure or other improvement whose stress or weight, collapse or
movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure, and
c. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public
safety or provide stability.
If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate of retreat of the bluff is such that
any structure or improvement constructed pursuant to the building permit would be unrea-
(Revised) 19-30
Packet Pg. 116
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10 0110
sonably endangered or reasonably could be anticipated to be endangered by landslide or
earth subsidence during its normal useful life, the application shall be denied.
7. Geotechnical letter addressing the provisions of Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
I. The applicant shall submit, consistent with the findings of the geotechnical report,
detailed structural plans with corresponding calculations prepared and stamped by the
structural engineer of record. When architectural plans incorporate such structural details,
said plans shall be stamped and signed by the structural engineer of record. All other archi-
tectural plans may be prepared by an architect, designer, builder or lay person.
J. The applicant shall submit documentation of required bonds, frozen funds or adequate
instrument of credit. The applicant shall submit a copy of the contractor's general public
liability insurance pursuant to ECDC 19.10.050.
K. The applicant shall submit declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers as
required by ECDC 19.10.040. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.10.040
Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers.
A. Notices of permit submittal application with the city shall be posted pursuant to ECDC
20.03.002. Such notices shall be conspicuously posted and maintained at each street
frontage. Notice of permit issuance or denial shall be conspicuously posted as required
above. Upon each posting a 10-day appeal period shall commence. Appeals shall be to the
Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, and no
other appeal shall be permitted.
B. At permit application submittal, the applicant shall submit a written declaration with
the permit application that includes the statement that the accuracy of all information is
warranted by the owner/applicant in a form which relieves the city and its staff from any
liability associated with reliance on such submittals.
The declaration shall also state that the owner/applicant understands and accepts the risk
of developing in an area with potential unstable soils and that the owner/applicant will
advise in writing any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective purchasers or
residential lessees of structures or portions of a structure on the site, of the slide potential of
the area.
The owner/applicant shall also acknowledge that he, she or they understand and accept
the need for future monitoring and maintenance of the property as described in the final
geotechnical report when future monitoring and maintenance may affect slope stability over
time. While an application may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the city,
all conclusions shall be those of the owner/applicant and his or her professionals.
C. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter from the geotechnical engineer
and civil engineer who prepared the geotechnical report and civil plans, stating that in his or
her judgment the plans and specifications submitted for the project conform to the
recommendations in the geotechnical report, and that the risk of damage to the proposed
development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimized subject to the
conditions set forth in the report, and the proposed development will not increase the
potential for soil movement.
"Minimized" shall mean that the applicant has utilized best available science and com-
monly accepted engineering and architectural practice to minimize, to the extent possible,
the risks associated with development of the property.
19-31 Packet Pg. 117
4.5.a
19.10.040
The geotechnical engineer shall review the erosion and sediment control plan and provide
a statement about the adequacy of the plan with respect to site conditions and report find-
ings. The geotechnical engineer's statement shall also include an identification of landslide
hazards applicable to the site, the on -site measures taken to correct or reduce the hazards, as
applicable, and measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards.
For sites where the hazards are not mitigated or where the risks from deep-seated or
large-scale earth movement cannot be practically reduced by individual lot owners, the
geotechnical engineer shall prepare a statement identifying what design measures will be
taken to mitigate the risk to structures, adjacent properties, and inhabitants in the event of
deep-seated or large-scale movement. The statement shall specify any risks from earth
movement that are not fully mitigated by design measures and render an opinion as to
whether the site will be stable within the meaning of this chapter following installation of
all proposed improvements. The statement will clarify to current and future owners what
measures were installed to reduce risks and what hazards could not be addressed by
individual lot development.
D. Further recommendations signed and sealed by the geotechnical engineer shall be
provided should there be additions or exceptions to the original recommendations based on
the plans, site conditions or other supporting data. If the geotechnical engineer who reviews
the plans and specifications is not the same engineer who prepared the geotechnical report,
the new engineer shall, in a letter to the director accompanying the plans and specifications,
express agreement or disagreement with the recommendations in the geotechnical report
and state that the revised plans and specifications conform to the new recommendations.
E. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter or notation on the design
drawings by the structural engineer of record stating that he has reviewed the geotechnical
report(s), that he understands its recommendations, has explained or has had explained to
the owner/applicant the risk of loss due to slides on the site, and that he has incorporated
into the design the recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the
potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any risk of earth movement refer-
enced in the report. The statement shall note any risks, hazards, and potential problems from
earth movement that are not fully mitigated by design measures.
F. The owner shall execute a covenant (in a form provided by the city) to be submitted
with the application (with necessary fee) to be filed with the Snohomish County auditor.
The director shall cause such completed covenant to be so filed. A copy of the recorded
covenant shall be forwarded to the owner. This covenant shall be a covenant running with
the land, which shall at a minimum include:
1. A legal description of the property.
2. A statement explaining that the site is in a potential earth subsidence and landslide
hazard area, that the risk associated with the development of the site is set forth in permit
file No. with the city of Edmonds building department, that conditions or prohi-
bitions on development may have been imposed by the city in the course of permit issuance,
and referencing any features in the design which will require maintenance or modification
to address anticipated soil changes. The covenant may incorporate by reference the
statements and conditions to be observed in the form proposed by the owner/applicant's
geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer as approved after the
review set forth in ECDC 19.10.060.
(Revised) 19-32
Packet Pg. 118
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10 Atli)
3. A statement waiving and promising to indemnify and hold harmless the city of
Edmonds, its officers and employees from any claims the owner/applicant and his/her
successors or assigns may have for any loss or damage to people or property either on or off
the site resulting from soil movement and arising from or out of the issuances of any
permit(s) authorizing development on the site, as well as due to any act or failure to act by
the indemnitor, its agents or successors, in interest under or following issuance of the
permit.
4. The date of permit issuance and permit number authorizing the development. [Ord.
3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3817 § 9, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 36, 2009; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.10.050
Site bonds and contractor general public liability insurance.
A. Site Bonding Requirements.
1. A surety bond, in an amount to be determined by the director, executed by a surety
company authorized to do business in the state of Washington shall be posted by the
owner/applicant or general contractor to assure the restoration of any areas on the site, or in
the surrounding area, disturbed or damaged by slides during construction, and to ensure
completion of the work authorized by the permit, or, if the work is not completed, to assure
that the site will be restored to a safe and stable condition at least equal to the safety and
stability of the site prior to commencement of work under the permit. The bond will be
exonerated upon occupancy approval of the building permit by the building official.
2. In lieu of the surety bond, the owner/applicant or general contractor may propose to
file a cash deposit or an instrument of credit with the director in an amount equal to that
which would be required in the surety bond, and similarly conditioned.
B. Public Liability Insurance. The general contractor of record shall carry general public
liability insurance effective through final occupancy in the minimum amount of $1,000,000,
and which shall name the city as an additional named insured, against the injury, death,
property damage and/or loss arising from or out of the city's involvement in the permitting
process for the project.
C. Homeowner Insurance. The city strongly recommends that each property owner
maintain policies of liability insurance, adequate to provide sufficient funds, to indemnify
and hold harmless third parties in the event of earth subsidence or landslides emanating
from or across the owner's property. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.10.060
Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best
available science.
A. The city shall require professional peer review of the plan set submittals accompany-
ing the permit application by a civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, geologist, and/or struc-
tural engineer as may be necessary and determined by the building official or director, in
order to determine whether the plan set submittals were prepared in accordance with gen-
erally accepted engineering practice or the practice of the particular engineering or design
specialty and are based upon best available science. The full cost of such peer review shall
be paid in full by the owner/applicant within 30 days of billing by the city. Failure to make
timely payments shall result in a stay of city plan review services on the application.
19-33 Packet Pg. 119
4.5.a
19.10.070
B. This requirement may be selectively waived at the discretion of the director, provided
the applicable project geotechnical engineer, civil engineer or structural engineer provides
written concurrence, determination, details, facts and/or data that individual site conditions
warrant an exemption from outside peer review. Once waived, the building official shall not
be required to inquire further into the adequacy of any report, plans, or data, but rather may
rely upon the submittals as warranted by the owner/applicant as reviewed by the city's
consultant. Nothing herein shall relieve the owner/applicant of the obligation to submit a
complete application fulfilling all the requirements of this chapter and the IRC/IBC.
C. The final recommendation of the peer review regarding whether a submittal complies
with generally accepted practice and/or is based on best available science shall be binding
upon the building official. Such recommendation may be appealed to superior court under
the Land Use Petition Act. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.10.070
Issuance and denial of permits.
A. Permit Issuance. The following requirements must be satisfied before a permit will be
issued:
1. An approved geotechnical report has been submitted and approved.
2. Plans and specifications have been submitted incorporating the recommendations of
the geotechnical report and said plans have been approved.
3. The required declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers have been submitted
and approved.
4. Required bonds, cash deposits and public liability insurance have been posted with
the city.
5. When peer review has been required, all submittals have been determined to have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice.
6. Peer review concurrence for permit issuance has been received by the building
official.
7. All other provisions of ECDC Titles 16, 18 and 20 have been reviewed and
approved by the appropriate city official.
B. Permit Denial. The following criteria shall result in the denial of issuance of permit:
1. Building, grading and excavation permits for construction on land which the direc-
tor finds to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory
foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography, or
2. The resulting development would increase the potential of soil movement resulting
in an unacceptable risk of damage to adjacent properties or an unreasonable risk of damage
to the proposed development, or
3. Excessive flooding, seepage, high water table, or inadequate drainage, or
4. If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate of retreat of the bluff is such that
any structure or improvement would be unreasonably endangered or reasonably could be
anticipated to be endangered by landslide or earth subsidence during its normal useful life,
the application shall be denied. A "structure" is defined as:
a. A building intended for human habitation,
b. A building, structure or other improvement whose stress or weight, collapse or
movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure, and
(Revised) 19-34
Packet Pg. 120
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10 mQ
c. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public
safety or provide stability, or
5. Other hazardous conditions posing an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or
welfare, or
6. Where the noted site dangers or geologic hazards are not minimized to the extent
possible by the use of best available science and generally accepted engineering and archi-
tectural practice, or
7. If the applicant's geotechnical engineer determines that there is a greater chance
than 30 percent in a 25-year period that landslide damage on site will occur.
C. In making a determination of permit denial, the director shall consider not only the
land which is the subject of the application, but in addition, the surrounding area which
would be adversely affected if the permit were granted. Permit denial shall be made in
writing to the owner/applicant when the site cannot be rendered "stable" as defined in
ECDC 19.10.020(0). This decision and other preliminary determinations as referenced
herein shall be appealable to Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the Land
Use Petition Act. No other appeal shall be permitted. The appeal period shall commence
upon the date of mailing of any preliminary or final decision, or upon posting, if posting is
the only notice a party with standing receives under the terms of this chapter.
D. Prohibitions. Because of the relationship of groundwater to stability, the discharge of
collected surface water or stormwater to the ground surface or subsurface is prohibited on
sites within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. In addition, the following con-
struction, buildings, or improvements are hereby prohibited within the earth subsidence and
landslide hazard area:
1. Swimming pools or hot tubs.
2. Ponds or other artificial impoundments of water.
3. Watering or irrigation systems.
4. Temporary or permanent stockpile of fill on top or bottom of slopes.
5. Rockeries.
E. Waiver. The prohibitions established in subsection (D) of this section shall apply
unless the property owner requests a waiver based upon the written analysis of a geotechni-
cal engineer which clearly establishes that the proposed improvement will have no reason-
able likelihood of triggering or otherwise contributing to any landslide hazard or earth
subsidence risk either on the site or in the neighboring earth subsidence or landslide hazard
area.
In any review or appeal of the director's or building official's denial of a waiver to con-
struct an otherwise prohibited improvement, the burden of proof shall always be upon the
applicant to establish by a clear preponderance of the evidence that no such risk will be cre-
ated by the improvement. Any geotechnical engineering report provided in any review shall
consider not only the risk incurred due to or during construction of the otherwise prohibited
improvement, but also the potential impacts due to failure to maintain the improvement,
damage through reasonably foreseeable events such as earthquakes or other acts of God, or
the reasonably foreseeable negligence of the owner or future owners. The director may
utilize peer review consultants. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19-35 Packet Pg. 121
4.5.a
19.10.080
19.10.080
Site access, professional/special inspection, monitoring during construction
and final geotechnical report.
A. Site Clearing and Grading. The owner/applicant or contractor shall secure the building
official's approval before entering an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area site with
excavating or other grading and clearing equipment to clear, remove trees or grade for any
purpose including the creation of access to the site.
The building official may condition such access approval if site conditions are warranted
and when discretionary approval permits are required. As part of the approval process the
building official may impose conditions that address site work issues; such measures could
include but are not limited to limiting all excavation and drainage installation to the drier
season between May and the end of September, or sequencing activities such as the
installation of drainage systems well in advance of construction.
Requests for early site access in advance of building permit approval or in the time period
between October 1 st and April 30th for any purpose shall be submitted to the building offi-
cial accompanied by written concurrence of the owner/applicant's geotechnical engineer of
record.
The building official may utilize peer review consultants to determine whether the
request is based on generally accepted engineering practice and is reasonable with regard to
time -frame to complete the work, types of equipment proposed to perform the work, length
of exposure of slopes, and adequacy of site monitoring and temporary erosion control
measures. When such peer review is utilized, the applicant is responsible for the peer review
fee.
B. Reporting Authority. The owner/applicant shall retain a geotechnical engineer to
monitor the site during construction. The owner/applicant shall preferably retain the
geotechnical engineer who prepared the final geotechnical report in the plan set submittal
and who has reviewed the approved plans and specifications.
If a different geotechnical engineering consultant is retained by the owner/applicant, the
new geotechnical engineer shall submit a letter to the director stating that he or she has read
all reports and recommendations and reviews to date and state whether or not he or she
agrees with the opinions and recommendations of the original geotechnical report and peer
review comments. Further recommendations, signed and sealed by the new geotechnical
engineer, and supporting data shall be provided should there be exceptions or changes to the
original recommendations that would affect the approved plans.
C. Construction Monitoring, Special Inspections.
1. Inspection Requirements. During the period from October 1st to April 30th, when
on site, the owner/applicant or designated erosion sedimentation control (ESC) site
supervisor shall perform erosion and sedimentation control inspections. Records of installed
ESC facilities shall be maintained by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor and
copies of all ESC records shall be provided to city inspectors upon request.
ESC facilities on inactive sites (sites where no work will be performed for more than
three consecutive days) shall be inspected weekly by the erosion and sedimentation control
supervisor. During all other times of the year, weekly inspections by the ESC site supervisor
are required and shall be recorded.
2. Weekly Field Reports. The geotechnical engineer shall monitor, during construc-
tion, compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report including: site
(Revised) 19-36
Packet Pg. 122
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.10 AQQ
excavation, shoring, temporary erosion control, soil support for foundation, piles,
subdrainage installation, soil compaction and other geotechnical aspects of the construction.
Unless otherwise approved by the director, the specific recommendations contained in the
geotechnical report shall be implemented by the owner/applicant. Omissions or deviations
from the approved geotechnical report and civil plans shall be highlighted to the city in a
separate report. All reports shall be submitted to the city on a weekly basis for review.
Failure to submit required reports may result in the issuance of a stop work order.
3. Storm Events. During all work periods, special inspections shall be performed after
"storm events" as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(Q). The storm event report shall be provided
within one week of the event.
D. Final Construction Report. The geotechnical engineer of record shall prepare a final
written report to be submitted to the building official stating that, based upon his or her pro-
fessional opinion, site observations and final site grading, the completed development sub-
stantially complies with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and with all
geotechnical-related permit requirements as shown on the approved plans.
"Substantially complies" means that the completed development offers at least the level
of stability and safety, on- and off -site, as was afforded by the original recommendations
and report. Recommendations to the owner/applicant shall be included in the report for
future monitoring and maintenance of the property including drainage, tightlines, catch
basins, berms, retaining wall drainage, hazard mitigation improvements, slopes, bluffs,
vegetation, and permanent erosion control that affect slope stability over time. Occupancy
of the residence shall not be granted until the report has been reviewed and accepted by the
building official. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19-37 Packet Pg. 123
4.5.a
19.15.000
Chapter 19.15
MECHANICAL CODE AND FUEL GAS CODE
Sections:
19.15.000 International Mechanical Code adopted.
19.15.005 Amendments.
19.15.010 International Fuel Gas Code adopted.
19.15.015 Repealed.
19.15.000
International Mechanical Code adopted.
The International Mechanical Code (IMC), 241-2L2015 Edition, published by the
International Code Council, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council in
Chapter 51-52 WAC, and as subsequently amended by this chapter is hereby adopted. [Ord.
3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 3, 2010].
19.15.005
Amendments.
Chapter 1 is not adopted, except as provided for in ECDC 19.00.015. [Ord. 3926 § 1
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 3, 2010].
19.15.010
International Fuel Gas Code adopted.
The International Fuel Gas Code, 241-2-2015 Edition, published by the International Code
Council, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council in Chapter 51-52
WAC inclusive of NFPA 54 and 58, and as subsequently amended by this chapter, is hereby
adopted. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 3, 2010].
19.15.015
Amendments.
Repealed by Ord. 3926. [Ord. 3796 § 3, 2010].
(Revised) 19-38
Packet Pg. 124
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.20010
Chapter 19.20
PLUMBING CODE
Sections:
19.20.000 Uniform Plumbing Code adopted.
19.20.005 Amendments.
19.20.010 Evidence of potable water.
19.20.000
Uniform Plumbing Code adopted.
The Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2812--2015 Edition, published by the International
Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, as amended by the Washington State
Building Code Council in Chapter 51-56 WAC, and as subsequently amended by this
chapter, provided that any provisions that affect fuel gas piping are not adopted, is hereby
adopted. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 4, 2010].
19.20.005
Amendments.
A. Chapter 1 is not adopted, except as provided for in ECDC 19.00.015.
B. Chapter 12, Fuel piping, is deleted.
C. Chapter 4514, Firestop protection, is deleted. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord.
3796 § 4, 2010].
19.20.010
Evidence of potable water.
Prior to the issuance of any building permit for new development, the building official
shall require substantive evidence of an adequate potable water supply from the purveyor of
water to the site for which a building permit is requested. For those areas lying within the
service area of the city of Edmonds water utility, the notification from a duly authorized
representative of the city's water utility shall be sufficient; provided, nothing herein shall be
interpreted to prevent the city or any of its water purveyors from declaring a moratorium or
other water emergency limiting or otherwise restricting the availability of adequate potable
water. Applicants relying on a well shall provide a copy of applicable state approval for the
appropriation and a current test of water quality by a qualified laboratory. [Ord. 3926 § 1
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 4, 2010].
19-39 Packet Pg. 125
4.5.a
19.20.010
Chapter 19.25
FIRE CODE
Sections:
19.25.000
International Fire Code adopted.
19.25.005
Section amendments.
19.25.010
Department of fire prevention.
19.25.015
Definitions.
19.25.020
Permits.
19.25.025
Charges for fire review and inspection.
19.25.030
Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
19.25.035
Automatic sprinkler systems.
19.25.036
Dwelling fire sprinkler systems and connection fees.
19.25.040
Fire protection water supplies.
19.25.045
Charges for water mains and hydrants.
19.25.050
Mains and service lines.
19.25.055
Location of public hydrants.
19.25.060
Location of private hydrants.
19.25.065
Hydrant specifications.
19.25.070
Penalties.
19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the International Fire Code
(IFC), 21-2 2015 Edition, as published by the International Code Council including
amendments set forth in Chapter 51-54A WAC, and subsequently revised by this chapter, is
hereby adopted including reference standards of the National Fire Protection Association and
Appendix Chapters B and C. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]._
19.25.005 Section amendments.
The following sections of the IFC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows:
a�
r
a
a�
as
Ln
N
M
a
c
as
E
0
r
as
:.o
c
m
E
s
U
ea
El
(Revised) 19-40
Packet Pg. 126
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.200110
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section 102.5 Application of Residential Code. Adopted as originally set forth in
IFC (notwithstanding revisions thereto by the state building code council).
2. Section 103.1-.2 Department of Fire Prevention. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.010.
3. Section 104.8 Modifications. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.030.
4. Section 104.10.1 Assistance from other agencies. Police and other enforcement
agencies shall have the authority to render necessary assistance in the investigation
of fires and enforcement and hazardous conditions of this code when requested by
the fire marshal.
5. Section 105.1.1 Permits required. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.020.
6. Section 108 Board of appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
7. Section 109.3 109.4 Violation Penalties. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.070.
B. Chapter 3, General Requirements.
Section 308.1.6.3 Skv Lanterns. Is amended to read: It is unlawful for
person to sell, use, transfer, discharge or ignite to any sky lantern within the city limits.
BC. Chapter 5, Fire Service Features.
Section 503 Fire Apparatus Access Roads. The following sections are adopted as
originally set forth in the IFC with the exception of 503.2.2:
1. Section 503.1 Where required.
2. Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities.
3. Section 503.1.2 Additional access.
4. Section 503.1.3 High -piled storage.
5. Section 503.2 Specifications.
19-41 Packet Pg. 127
4.5.a
19.20.010
6. Section 503.3 Marking.
7. Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads.
Section 503.2.2 is amended to read:
Authority. The fire code official shall have the authority to require an increase in the
minimum access widths where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations, and
the authority to decrease the minimum access widths where other fire protection
features are provided.
a�
r
a
F: GD, Chapter 36, Marinas. Replaced in entirety by Chapter 19.65 ECDC.
as
C BE. Chapter 56, Explosives and Fireworks.
Ln
N
Section 5601.1.3 Fireworks. Replaced by Chapter 5.27 ECC.
1, U. Chapter 57 Flammable and Combustible Liquids.
Sections 5704.2.9.6.1 (outside) and 5706.2.4.4 (inside) Locations where
above -ground tanks are prohibited. Class I and II flammable liquids in aboveground
storage tanks are restricted for the protection of residential districts and shall be no
more than 1,000 gallons capacity in residential zones designated by the city.
L— FG. Chapter 61 Liquified Liquefied Petroleum Gases.
Section 6104.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. The maximum capacity
for each installation is restricted for the protection of residential districts within the
city and shall be no more than 500 gallons water capacity in residential zones
designated by the city.
[Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
(Revised) 19-42
Packet Pg. 128
4.5.a
Edmonds Community Development Code 19.20 A l i)
19.25.010 Department of fire prevention.
A. There is established in the city a department of fire prevention supervised by the fire
marshal or deputy chief of fire prevention acting under the supervision of the fire chief. The
function of the department shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of
the provisions of this code.
B. An annual report shall be provided to the mayor containing proceedings under this code,
with other statistics as the fire chief and mayor wish to include. The fire marshal may also
recommend any changes to the code. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
a�
r
19.25.015 Definitions.
a
A. Whenever the term "fire code official" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire marshal or M
a�
deputy chief of fire prevention.
Ln
B. Whenever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds. M
C. Whenever the term "legal representative of the jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall
mean the city attorney.
D. Whenever the term "police" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds police
department. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.020 Permits.
A. Operational permits required under the city's fire code and regulated by the city shall be
issued by the fire marshal. The application for the permit shall be accompanied by the full
application fee in order to vest rights under the permit and to constitute a complete permit
application. The permit fee shall be set by the city council annually by resolution or on such
review cycle as the council, in its discretion, shall determine. All permits shall be renewed
annually unless the specific time period is set forth when the permit is granted. No permit
shall be transferable and each permit shall be issued on a single job, transaction, owner, or
occupancy basis, except that the fire marshal is authorized to consolidate permits for a single
location, building, or unit.
19-43 Packet Pg. 129
19.20.010
B. In the event that the activity, location or risk associated with the activity requires a fire
safety inspection in excess of the time estimated within the permit fee (one hour) an
inspection fee equal to the actual cost to the city of providing the inspection shall be charged
pursuant to ECDC 19.25.025. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection.
A. Certain licenses and permits issued by the city include a fire department inspection. The
cost of the permit may include an estimate of the normal time associated with the fire
inspection. Where the permit does not include such an estimate, or when the estimate of time
established within the ordinance is exceeded by the actual time spent inspecting a premises,
location or activity, the actual cost of conducting the inspection shall be charged. The
administrative services director is authorized to establish on an annual basis, in conjunction
a�
with or immediately following the budget process, a fee for the hourly charge associated with
the provision of services by reasonable classifications of fire marshal and fire inspector.
Ln
M
B. The permittee shall pay the actual charges of inspection, in addition to the permit fee
associated with such activity. Licenses and permits requiring the actual payment of inspection
charges include, but are not limited to, public amusement licenses issued pursuant to Chapter
4.32 ECC, cabaret dance licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.48 ECC, adult entertainment
facility licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.52 ECC, business licenses issued pursuant to
Chapter 4.72 ECC, and aircraft landing licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.80 ECC.
C. No charge shall be levied against any department or agency of the city of Edmonds
operating within the city's general fund. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
A. The fire marshal shall have the authority to modify any of the provisions of the IFC or this
chapter on written application by the owner, lessee, or his duly authorized agent when there
are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict letter of the code. Approved modifications,
including alternative materials and methods, shall observe the spirit of the code, preserve fire -
(Revised) 19-44
Packet Pg. 130
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.20 Ali)
and life -safety, secure the public health, and do substantial justice. A signed copy of approved
modifications shall be promptly given to the applicant.
B. Details of actions granting modifications and related interpretations shall be recorded and
preserved in the records of the department of fire prevention to aid in conformance and
uniform application of related codes, ordinances, and standards.
C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied
for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and
meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may
appeal from the decision of the fire marshal to the hearings examiner. Such appeals shall be
governed by the procedures set forth in Chapter 19.80 ECDC. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013;
a�
Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
as
19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems.
M
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained throughout every building
a
constructed under the International Residential Code containing five or more attached
dwelling units. Residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in
r
accordance with their approved listing in the dwelling. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord.
3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.036 Dwelling fire sprinkler systems and connection fees.
A. Where dwelling fire sprinkler systems are required to be installed in a dwelling (building
containing one or two dwelling units) constructed under the International Residential Code
(IRC), a single water connection may provide fire protection and domestic services through
combination water lines utilizing an integrated fire and plumbing flow -through piping system
described in IRC Appendix R (WAC 51-51-60105).
B. Automatic sprinkler systems installed pursuant to subsection (A) of this section shall not
be subject to the cost differential from general facility charges for connection to the public
water system when an up -sized meter is required to meet the design flow rate for, and is solely
attributable to, the installation of the automatic sprinkler system. All other costs, including
19-45 Packet Pg. 131
4.5.a
19.20.010
the expense of a larger meter, a general facility charge attributable to the meter sized for the
domestic service alone, and other permits and fees, shall remain the responsibility of the
owner.
C. When automatic sprinkler systems designed for life safety and installed pursuant to
subsection (A) of this section are integrated and dependent upon the domestic water supply of
the residential dwelling unit, the property owner shall be responsible for maintaining the
service connection and paying for an adequate supply of water to the residential dwelling
unit. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3819 § 3, 2010].
a�
19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies.
a
All fire hydrant, water main and appurtenance installations shall meet the provisions of this
chapter as well as other applicable plans, standards and codes adopted by the city of
Edmonds, as a condition of approval of subdivisions and building permits. [Ord. 3926 § 1 Ln
N
M
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants.
A. For private development, owners shall be responsible for the replacement (upgrade) of the
existing public main (including fire hydrants and appurtenances) to city standard when
identified by the city engineer as a condition of development approval. The city will pay the
difference in material costs only between six inches and the size that is required to be installed
only when the existing system is a looped system.
B. A hydrant use permit issued by the public works director is required in order for any person
or entity other than fire department personnel to draw water from any fire hydrant.
C. The installation of water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances to properties not
previously served shall be sized in accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan, built
to city standard and shall be at the benefited property owner's or developer's expense.
D. Oversized water mains required for special use demands relating to a particular property or
development shall be installed at the developer's or property owner's expense.
(Revised) 19-46
Packet Pg. 132
4.5.a
Edmonds Community Development Code 19.20 A"
E. If the water mains installed pursuant to subsections (C) and (D) of this section provide
service or benefits to properties other than owned by the water main installer, latecomer
agreements may be arranged between the city and the installer for the construction and
dedication of the water facilities pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 35.91 RCW. [Ord.
3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.050 Mains and service lines.
A. All public hydrants in single-family areas shall be supplied by not less than six-inch
looped water mains. All hydrants in areas other than single-family residential shall be
supplied by not less than eight -inch looped water mains. Dead-end water mains to hydrants
shall be at least eight inches in diameter, with the exception of mains up to 50 feet long which
a�
may be no less than six inches in diameter.
B. The service line from the water main to the hydrant shall be no less than six inches in Ln
N
M
diameter. Any service lines over 50 feet in length from water main to hydrant shall be no less
a
than eight inches in diameter.
C. When city streets, or state highways having water mains in the public right-of-way, are
improved to permanent street or highway improvement standards, any water mains in the
public right-of-way of said streets or highways that are substandard as to size or material
according to applicable city standards shall be replaced with ductile iron water mains
conforming to applicable city standards and plans. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798
§ 1, 2010].
19.25.055 Location of public hydrants.
A. Public hydrants are those owned by the city.
B. All public fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Public
hydrant spacing shall be measured along vehicle access routes.
C. In areas zoned for single-family residential use, public hydrants shall be spaced no more
than 600 feet apart. If dead-end streets, or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300
19-47 Packet Pg. 133
4.5.a
19.20.010
feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not
over 600 feet.
D. In areas other than single-family residential, public fire hydrants shall be spaced an
average of 300 feet apart. If dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over
150 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing
is not over 300 feet. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.060 Location of private hydrants.
A. A private hydrant is privately owned, but is subject to the use of the city for inspection and
a�
r
testing at reasonable times, and for fire suppression at any time. All private hydrants shall be
a
connected to the city water main through a privately owned and maintained double detector
check valve assembly.
B. All buildings except single-family dwellings that are located so that a portion is more than
M
200 feet from a street, as measured along vehicle access routes, shall have private fire
a
hydrants located at the building. Single-family dwellings with a fire -flow calculation area
greater than 4,800 square feet may require a private hydrant.
C. Buildings having required fire flows of 3,000 gallons per minute may have fire hydrants on
one side of the building only. There shall never be fewer than two fire hydrants for any
building larger than 5,000 square feet in the first floor area including covered parking and
storage. When the required fire flow is 3,000 gallons per minute or greater, the fire hydrants
shall be served by a looped main around the building or complex of buildings.
D. Fire hydrants shall be spaced on an average 300 feet around the perimeter line, 50 feet out
of the buildings. All hydrants shall be placed in locations accessible to fire department
vehicles adjacent to fire apparatus access roads. The fire marshal shall determine the location
of fire hydrants depending on utility, topography and building location for maximum fire
protection. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
19.25.065 Hydrant specifications.
(Revised) 19-48
Packet Pg. 134
4.5.a
Edmonds Community Development Code 19.20 A"
A. The installation of flush type hydrants (hydrants entirely below grade) is prohibited.
B. Fire hydrants shall have two two -and -one -half -inch hose outlets and one
four -and -one -half -inch pumper outlet. All outlets' ports shall have national standard thread.
Additionally, the pumper outlet shall be provided with a four -inch Storz adapter. Fire
hydrants shall meet the American Water Works Association Standard No. C-502 and current
city standards.
C. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with generally accepted
engineering practices and city standards, and to the approval of the city engineer, who shall
also approve the selection and use of all pipe fittings and valves. There shall be a foot valve
installed between the service main and the hydrant sufficient to permit the repair and
a�
replacement of the hydrant without disruption of water service. The foot valve shall be
as
installed to city standards. The location of all such valves installed shall be properly and
accurately marked on as -built plans or drawings with generally acceptable engineering detail,
LO
N
two copies of which shall be furnished to the public works department. Valves shall be
a
furnished with a standard valve box.
c
E
D. Hydrants shall stand plumb, be set to established street grade with the lowest outlet of the
hydrant at least 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade and at least 36 inches of clear area
around the hydrant for clearance of hydrant wrench on both outlets and on the control valve.
The pumper port shall face the street, as determined by the fire marshal.
E. Where reasonably necessary to protect a hydrant from damage, the fire marshal may
require hydrants to be protected by two or more posts, eight inches in diameter by five feet
long, made either of reinforced concrete or steel.
F. If there presently exist fire hydrants which do not conform to these requirements, they shall
be replaced with conforming hydrants upon redevelopment or the timetable established by
the city's comprehensive plan.
G. No person shall plant any vegetation, erect any structure or perform any action which
results in the obstruction of a fire hydrant for a distance of 50 feet along the immediate route
19-49 Packet Pg. 135
4.5.a
19.20.010
of approach. The owner -occupant of any area in which a hydrant is located shall be
responsible for removing weed and tree growth from around the hydrant for a distance of not
less than five feet. The purpose of this section is to maintain clear approach and visual area
around the hydrant.
H. The installation of the fire hydrants and mains may be accomplished by city capital
contract, developers (as a condition of development) or public works department employees.
All installations are to be approved by the city engineer.
I. Following the installation of fire hydrants, all pipes, valves and hydrants shall be pressure
tested, purified, flushed and sampled to meet the requirements of the American Water Works
Association Standard No. C-502. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
a�
a�
19.25.070 Penalties.
A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the IFC including those standards of the M
National Fire Protection Association specifically referenced in the IFC as adopted and a
amended herein or fails to comply therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any
order made thereunder, or who builds in violation of any detailed statement of specifications
or plans submitted and approved thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken, or
who fails to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by decision of the city's board
of appeals or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the required time, shall severally for c
d
each and every such violation and noncompliance, respectively, be guilty of a gross
ea
misdemeanor, punishable as provided in ECC 5.50.020. Q
B. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it
to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or
defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited
conditions exist or are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application of the
above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions.
[Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010].
(Revised) 19-50
Packet Pg. 136
4.5.a
Edmonds Community Development Code 19.30 AM
Chapter 19.30
ENERGY CODE
Sections:
19.30.000 State Energy Code adopted. r
a
19.30.000
a�
State Energy Code adopted.
The Washington State Energy Code, 241-2-2015 Edition, as adopted and amended by the
Washington State Building Code Council in Chapter 51-11 WAC, is hereby adopted. [Ord.
3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 5, 2010]. M
19-51 Packet Pg. 137
4.5.a
19.30.000
Chapter 19.35
INTERNATIONALAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPAVENTILATION CODE
�ecti on s
19.52.000International Swimming Pool and Spa Code adopted.
19.52.000
International Swimming Pool and Spa Code adopted.
The International Code r „ ei Dorf m^H^eSwimming Pool and Spa Code, 2015 Edition,
z
published by the International Code Council, is hereby adopted.
a
a�
a�
Ln
N
M
(Revised ) 19-52
Packet Pg. 138
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.40 nn5
Chapter 19.40
INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
Sections:
19.40.000 International Property Maintenance Code adopted.
19.40.005 Amendments.
19.40.000
International Property Maintenance Code adopted.
The International Property Maintenance Code, 244zL2015 Edition, published by the
International Code Council, is hereby adopted. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796
§ 6, 2010].
19.40.005
Amendments.
A. Section 102.3, Application of other codes, is amended to read:
Repairs, additions or alterations to a structure, or changes of occupancy shall be
done in accordance with the procedures and provisions of the codes listed in ECDC
19.00.005. Nothing in this code shall be construed to cancel, modify or set aside any
provision of the ECDC.
B. Section 106, Violations, is deleted and replaced as follows:
Violation of any provisions of this code are subject to the Civil Violation — En-
forcement procedures in Chapter 20.110 ECDC.
C. Sections 108.2, Closing of vacant structures, 108.3, Notice, 108.4, Placarding, 108.5,
Prohibited occupancy, 108.6, Abatement methods, and 108.7, Record, are deleted and
replaced by the provisions of Chapter 20.110 ECDC.
D. Section 111, Means of Appeal, is deleted and replaced by ECDC 20.110.040(C).
E. Section 302 is deleted.
F. Section 303 is deleted.
G. Section 308 is deleted.
H. Section 309 is deleted. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 6, 2010].
19-53 Packet Pg. 139
4.5.a
19.45.000
Chapter 19.45
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL PERFORMANCE CODE
Sections:
19.45.000 International Code Council Performance Code adopted.
19.45.000
International Code Council Performance Code adopted.
The International Code Council Performance Code, 2012 2015 Edition, published by the
International Code Council, is hereby adopted. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796
§ 7, 2010].
(Revised) 19-54
Packet Pg. 140
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.5000()
Chapter 19.50
INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE
Sections:
19.50.000 International Existing Building Code adopted.
19.50.000
International Existing Building Code adopted.
The International Existing Building Code, 2012 2015 Edition, published by the
International Code Council, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council in
Chapter 51-50 WAC, and as subsequently amended by this chapter, is hereby adopted along
with Appendix Chapter A (Guidelines for the seismic retrofit of existing buildings) and
Resource A (Guidelines on fire ratings of archaic materials and assemblies). [Ord. 3926 § 1
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 8, 2010].
Section 302.6, Residential structures, is added and reads:
Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within designated
floodways, except for (i) repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a structure which
do not increase the ground floor areas; and (impairs, reconstruction or improvements
to a structure, the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the
structure either, (A) before the repair, or reconstruction is started, or (B) if the structure
has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. Any project for
improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of State or local health, san-
itary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code
enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living
conditions, or to structures identified as historic places, may be excluded in the 50
percent.
19-55 Packet Pg. 141
4.5.a
19.55.000
Chapter 19.55
ELECTRICAL CODE
Sections:
19.55.000 National Electrical Code adopted.
19.55.005 When code effective.
19.55.010 Nonliability.
19.55.015 Conflicts - How resolved.
19.55.000
National Electrical Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 35A.70.050 and RCW 19.28.141
National Fif:e Pr-oteetion Asseeiation, is hereby adopted as the eleetfieal eede for- the eity of
a�
r
Edmonds sttbjeet-to the amendments made4wfeinthe City of Edmonds may enforce the Q
same permitting and inspection standards applicable to basic electrical work as are enforced
by the department of labor and industries, including but not limited to the version of the
National Electrical Code that the department of labor and industries has most recently
adopted by rule. The State -of Washington Dep ent of Labor- ladustnes, Qeetfieal Ln
inspeetion ..
,
Rules and Regplations for- Installing Eleetfie Wir-ing and Equipment and N
M
of the eity of Edme
[Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 9, 2010; Ord. 3651 § 1, Q
2007]. a
19.55.005
When code effective.
If the state of Washington, through its duly designated electrical inspector or inspectors,
for any reason fails to continue to inspect electrical installation, license the same or provide
the standards, the provisions of the Edmonds electrical code as amended shall be applicable
to all electrical installation in the city as if the state of Washington had not exercised
jurisdiction of any kind. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 9, 2010; Ord. 3651 § 1,
2007].
19.55.010
Nonliability.
This chapter shall not be construed to relieve or lessen the responsibility of any person
owning, operating or installing any electrical equipment for damages to anyone injured by a
defect of the equipment, nor shall the city or its agent be held as assuming any such liability
by reason of the inspection under this code or the certificate of inspection issued by the
building department. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 9, 2010; Ord. 3651 § 1,
2007].
(Revised) 19-56
Packet Pg. 142
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.55 m 5
19.55.015
Conflicts — How resolved.
If there is any conflict between the electrical code of the city, the National Electrical
Code and/or the rules and regulations as set forth by the state of Washington for electric
wires and equipment, then the conditions, requirements, provisions or terms which provide,
in the opinion of the building official, for the greatest public safety shall be observed and
shall control. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3796 § 9, 2010; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19-57 Packet Pg. 143
4.5.a
19.60.000
Chapter 19.60
MOVING BUILDINGS
Sections:
19.60.000
Permit required.
19.60.005
Applicability.
19.60.010
Application requirements.
19.60.015
Pre -move inspection requirements and building upgrades.
19.60.020
Correction of defects.
19.60.000
Permit required.
Any person who proposes to move an existing building into or through the city of
Edmonds shall, before the move, apply for and obtain a moving permit from the building
official. A moving permit is separate from, and in addition to, any and all other permits
required to bring the moved building into compliance with current adopted codes and city
regulations. Separate permit approvals for grading, shoring, foundation, remodeling, repair
or alteration may be imposed to bring the building to current adopted code standards and
zoning compliance for height and setbacks. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1,
2007].
19.60.005
Applicability.
Buildings or structures moved into or within the city shall comply with the provisions of
this code including the current adopted editions of the following codes: International
Building Code, International Residential Code, International Mechanical Code, Interna-
tional Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Washington State Energy Code, Smote
Hister-ielntemational Existing Building Code, International Property Maintenance Code,
and applicable state WAC amendments. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1,
2007].
19.60.010
Application requirements.
A. In order to obtain permits to move any building through, along, or across the streets or
any public place within city limits, the building official shall determine permit submittal
requirements which, at a minimum, shall contain:
1. Proposed route;
2. Location of any overhead utility lines or traffic signals along with their height along
the route; and
3. Dimensions of building proposed to be moved.
B. The permit application shall be reviewed by the building official, public works
director, police chief, traffic engineer, fire department and any other affected city
department. If the proposed moving will unduly interfere with the rights of the public as
determined by the city engineer or designee, the permit shall be denied. Denial of the
application by one department shall constitute denial of the permit by the city.
(Revised) 19-58
Packet Pg. 144
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.60 (2q
C. A performance bond or frozen fund, pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, in an amount to
be determined by the building official shall be posted prior to permit issuance guaranteeing
the completion of all required site development improvements or site clean-up and/or repair
of damage to public property no later than 180 days after the permit is issued. The bond or
frozen fund will be exonerated upon final project approval provided all required site
restoration and/or improvements are installed, inspected and approved to city standards.
D. The moving contractor shall be state licensed and carry general public liability
insurance for the amount no less than $1,000,000, valid during entire building moving
operations, and the insurance policy shall name the city as an additional named insured,
against the injury, death, property damage and/or loss arising from or out of the city's
involvement in the permitting process for the project.
E. As a condition of obtaining a moving permit, the moving contractor shall assume all
liability for any damage to public property by such moving operations. Repair of damage to
any public property improvement shall be completed under a valid permit within 30 days of
date of notice. Emergency repair work performed by city crews to repair damage to public
improvements shall be charged against the moving contractor. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A),
2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.60.015
Pre -move inspection requirements and building upgrades.
A. Upon application and payment of the building moving permit fee, the building official
shall coordinate a date and time to perform a pre -move inspection with the applicant. The
pre -move inspection shall be made at the original location of the building before it is
moved.
B. The applicant shall remove from the building as much of the interior wall and ceiling
coverings as is necessary in the judgment of the building official to conduct a thorough
inspection of the wiring, plumbing and structural features of the building. The building
official shall determine what structural, energy, ventilation, plumbing, mechanical and
life -safety upgrades shall be imposed on any building moved into or within city limits in
compliance with current adopted codes. Designated historic buildings are also subject to
provisions of Chapter 19.50 ECDC. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.60.020
Correction of defects.
If, at or after the time of the inspection, the building official notifies the applicant that any
portion of the building, electrical wiring or rough plumbing is in any way in violation of the
ordinances of the city of Edmonds, so that compliance will require a replacement of any
parts or materials used, then any defective parts or materials shall be removed from the
building before it is moved. Any corrections required to comply with the ECDC, IBC and
IRC shall be completed and inspected before final approval and occupancy is granted. [Ord.
3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19-59 Packet Pg. 145
4.5.a
19.65.000
Chapter 19.65
MARINAS
Sections:
19.65.000
Application.
19.65.005
Building code — Compliance required.
19.65.010
Design live loads.
19.65.015
Materials.
19.65.020
Area and location requirements.
19.65.025
Fire Protection Standard adopted.
19.65.030
Fuel floats.
19.65.000
Application.
The provisions of this chapter apply to the construction, changes, repair and use of a
small boat marina providing covered floating boat moorage within the city. A marina is a
basin of safe anchorage providing moorage for small vessels. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A),
2013; Ord. 3798 § 2, 2010].
19.65.005
Building code — Compliance required.
All construction on or in connection with a marina shall comply with all the provisions of
this title including permits, permit fees and penalties and all other applicable ordinances of
the city and other applicable laws. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 2, 2010].
19.65.010
Design live loads.
A. Decks. Float decks shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per square foot
minimum.
B. Roofs. The roof structures shall have a design live load of at least 25 pounds per
square foot minimum.
C. Ramps. The ramps to floats shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per
square foot minimum. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 2, 2010].
19.65.015
Materials.
A. Roofs. Roof coverings shall be noncombustible.
B. Floats. Floating structures and floats shall be material of a type approved by the
building official. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 2, 2010].
19.65.020
Area and location requirements.
A. Length of Floats. The maximum length of any combination of floats shall be 500 feet
from the shore end of the gangplank to the outer end of the main float. A main float is a
(Revised) 19-60
Packet Pg. 146
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.65 flz0
center or side float connected by a ramp to the shore, being fixed laterally by a system of
piling but allowed to move vertically, and may have finger floats connected at intervals.
B. Length of Roofs. The maximum length of any roof over floats shall be 400 feet, mea-
sured along a main float. At least 75 percent of the exterior walls shall be open. The
maximum area covered shall be 30,000 square feet over any single main float area.
C. Separation. The minimum separation of covered moorage shall be 20 feet.
D. Floats, piers, and walkways shall provide an aisle not less than 44 inches in width.
E. Slips and mooring spaces shall be individually identified by an approved numeric or
alphabetic designator that shall be posted at each space. Signs indicating the space designa-
tors located on finger piers and floats shall be posted at the base of all piers, finger piers,
floats and finger floats. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 2, 2010].
19.65.025
Fire Protection Standard adopted.
A. The "Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards," 2006-2016 Edition, of the
National Fire Protection Association Publication No. 303 is hereby adopted to provide the
minimum acceptable level of safety to life and property from fire and electrical hazards at
marinas and boatyards. The most restrictive requirements from all codes and adopted stan-
dards may apply. In the event of any conflict between provisions of the fire and electrical
codes of the city of Edmonds as adopted by this title, the fire and electrical codes shall pre-
vail.
B. Access and Water Supply. Piers shall be provided with fire apparatus access roads and
water -supply systems with on -site hydrants where required by the fire marshal. The maxi-
mum distance from any point on a float system to an approved fire hydrant shall be 600
feet, except for fuel floats there shall be 300 feet.
C. Emergency Operations Staging Areas. Approved areas on piers and ashore shall be
provided for the staging of emergency equipment. These areas shall be posted with
approved signage to keep clear for emergency operations. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013;
Ord. 3798 § 2, 2010].
19.65.030
Fuel floats.
A. Fuel floats shall be constructed of gas -resistant flotation material and shall be sepa-
rated from other floats by at least 80 feet of open water.
B. All fuel storage tanks shall be located underground.
C. All fuel lines shall be provided with flexible connections from shore to floating facili-
ties.
D. Fire extinguishers shall be provided near fuel dispensers as approved by the Edmonds
fire department.
E. Gangplank access from shore to fuel floats shall be within 175 feet of fuel dispensers.
F. Fresh water taps shall be available on fuel floats.
G. All portions of a fuel float shall be located within 300 feet of a fire hydrant.
H. Moorage at any fuel float shall be prohibited and unlawful except during the shortest
time necessary to take on fuel. Moorage shall be unlawful at any fuel float at any time the
fuel pumps are not open for business and physically attended by the fuel pump proprietor,
his agent, employee or port tenant trained to a fire department approved environmental and
19-61 Packet Pg. 147
19.65.030
safety standard. It shall be the independent responsibility of the fuel pump proprietor, vessel
operator, and vessel owner to comply with this subsection and each said person or class of
persons shall be subject to the penalties of ECC 5.50.020 for any and all violations hereof.
I. All fuel spills shall be reported immediately in accordance with local, state and federal
requirements. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 2, 2010].
(Revised) 19-62
Packet Pg. 148
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.70010
Chapter 19.70
FEES
Sections:
19.70.000 Scope.
19.70.005 Repealed.
19.70.010 Schedule of permit fees.
19.70.015 Establishing building construction valuation.
19.70.020 Work commencing before permit issuance.
19.70.025 Refunds.
19.70.000
Scope.
Fees associated with this title including plan review, permit, inspection and related devel-
opment or mitigation fees are established by this chapter and as set forth in ECDC
15.00.020. Fees may be altered pursuant to city Resolution 997. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A),
2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.70.005
Payment of fees.
Repealed by Ord. 3926. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 20071.
19.70.010
Schedule of permit fees.
For buildings, structures, grading, gas, mechanical and plumbing systems or alterations
requiring a permit, a fee for each permit shall be paid as required, in accordance with this
chapter and ECDC 15.00.020. Fee schedules are on file in the city clerk's office.
A. Plan Review Fee. Before accepting a set of plans and specifications for plan review,
the building official shall collect the full plan review fee. Plan review fees shall be in addi-
tion to, and a percentage of, the required permit fee as calculated pursuant to ECDC
19.70.015.
B. Permit Fee. Before issuing a building permit and releasing approved plans, the build-
ing official shall collect the full building permit fees including supplemental required permit
fees, inspection fees and any additional plan review fee or violation compliance fee,
development fee or mitigation fee outstanding at the time of permit issuance. Building con-
struction valuation shall be determined by ECDC 19.70.015.
C. Inspection Fee. Inspection and reinspection fees shall be paid prior to any inspection
by city staff. Inspection fees are established and set forth in this chapter.
D. Related Development or Mitigation Fees. The payment of the fee for construction,
alteration, removal or demolition done in connection, or concurrently with, the work autho-
rized by a building permit shall not relieve the applicant or holder of the permit from the
payment of other fees that are prescribed by law. Fees for other permits or related
development fees shall be as set forth in ECDC 15.00.020. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013;
Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19-63 Packet Pg. 149
4.5.a
19.70.015
19.70.015
Establishing building construction valuation.
The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated building construction valuation at
time of application. Building construction valuation for the purpose of calculating permit
fees shall include total value of work including fair -market labor and materials with equip-
ment needed to complete the work, including but not limited to all construction work for
which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing,
heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other permanent
equipment. If, in the opinion of the building official, the building construction valuation is
underestimated on the application, the building official shall assign a building construction
valuation. Permit valuation for new construction shall be based on square footage building
construction valuation as established by the building official. [Ord. 3926 § I (Exh. A),
2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.70.020
Work commencing before permit issuance.
Any person who commences any work regulated by this title including work on a build-
ing, electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system before obtaining the necessary permits
shall be subject to a violation compliance fee established by the building official pursuant to
the city's fee schedule adopted by resolution that shall be in addition to the required permit
fees. The violation compliance fee shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or
subsequently issued. The payment of such violation compliance fee shall not exempt any
person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty
prescribed by law. Violation compliance fees are set forth in this chapter. [Ord. 3926 § 1
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.70.025
Refunds.
The building official may authorize refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erro-
neously paid or collected. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than
80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in
accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than
80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan
review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The
building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee on an expired permit. Any
application for a refund must be made in writing and describe the circumstances to justify.
[Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
(Revised) 19-64
Packet Pg. 150
4.5.a
Edmonds Community Development Code 19.75 005
Chapter 19.75
STREET NAMES AND ADDRESS NUMBERING
Sections:
19.75.000 Adoption of street name map and criteria.
19.75.005 Adoption of property and building numbering system and criteria.
19.75.010 Other street names and premises numbers prohibited.
19.75.000
Adoption of street name map and criteria.
A. There is hereby established a uniform system of designating street names/numbers in
the city of Edmonds. The street names/numbers are those depicted on that map entitled,
"official street map," a copy of which has been authenticated by the mayor of the city and
the attestation of the city clerk. The map and all explanatory matter on the map is
re -adopted and affirmed and by this reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
Official street name/number designations are the responsibility of the city engineer.
B. Pursuant to ECDC 18.50.030, any change to the name or number of any street on the
official street map shall be by action of the city council approving an ordinance changing
the official street map.
C. The city engineer shall maintain and update the official street map and shall desig-
nate/approve public and private street names/numbers in accordance with this chapter. All
approved street names/numbers shall be forwarded to the United States Postal Service
(USPS), public and private utilities, law enforcement agencies, emergency services
providers, and other persons of new or corrected street names/numbers. The city engineer
shall develop policies and guidelines for street names and numbers in accordance with the
following guidelines:
1. New street designations shall be in accordance with the Snohomish County grid
system and the official street map.
2. When descriptive street names (as opposed to numerical street designations) are
allowed by subsection (C)(1) of this section, preference shall be for descriptive names with
logical relationship to locale or geographic area, and avoidance of private individual names.
3. Facilitation of map reading and indexing to assist in rapid location of streets and
addresses.
4. Avoidance of multiple and/or alternative names for single street sections and
requirement of selection of a primary street designation to assist in the Enhanced 9-1-1 grid
system for emergency services dispatching.
5. Any other appropriate and applicable standards concerning street and street
designations as well as current department of public works policies, guidelines, or rules for
naming public streets as determined by the director. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord.
3651 § 1, 2007].
19.75.005
Adoption of property and building numbering system and criteria.
A. There is hereby established a uniform system for numbering properties, buildings and
primary structures in the city of Edmonds. The official building and property address map
19-65 Packet Pg. 151
4.5.a
19.75.010
depicting all issued property address numbers is maintained by the building official or
designee. The building official assigns, maintains and corrects addresses for the city of
Edmonds and shall notify the United States Postal Service (LISPS), emergency services
providers and other persons of new or corrected addresses.
B. Addresses shall conform to the numerical grid system established by Enhanced 9-1-1.
The number utilized by each building or property shall be that number within the system
assigned by the building official. Addresses are assigned based on the location of the drive-
way access or house frontage to a street and only one address is allowed per building on any
lot. Numbers assigned during any previous numbering system that fit within the grid system
are hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect.
C. The building official shall require any address not in conformance or any address that
poses any problem or confusion for safety and emergency response be changed within 30
days of written notification from the city of Edmonds.
D. All owners or occupants of all buildings and structures in the city of Edmonds, other
than garages or other similar buildings or structures of a secondary nature to the primary
building or structure, shall affix and maintain the officially designated premises number to
the building or structure pursuant to ECDC 19.00.025(0). When topography or vegetation
may obscure vision from the street, the numerals shall be affixed as to be reasonably visible
from the street.
E. Where any commercial building, multiple -family residential structure, or other similar
structure has more than one entrance serving separate occupants, a suite designation or
apartment number shall be assigned to each entrance serving a tenant or resident in addition
to the number assigned to the principal entrance of the building or structure. The unit
designations shall be progressive as assigned in the progressive direction of the street and
per the property numbering system approved by this code.
F. All requests for a building or property address change shall be made in writing to the
building official and all of the following conditions shall be present in order for the request
to be approved:
1. An obvious error shall exist (i.e., the building was addressed off a street not associ-
ated with the site, the building or property addresses are out of sequence, duplicate address
exists), etc.
2. The existing address could delay fire, police or emergency services from finding the
location in an emergency.
3. The fire department agrees the address change is necessary. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh.
A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.75.010
Other street names and premises numbers prohibited.
It is unlawful for any owner or occupant of any premises, building or structure to display
a street name or premises number other than those officially designated pursuant to the pro-
visions of this chapter, subject to penalties per Chapter 5.50 ECC and Chapter 20.110
ECDC. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
(Revised) 19-66
Packet Pg. 152
4.5.a
Edmonds Community Development Code 19.80 005
Chapter 19.80
APPEALS
Sections:
19.80.000 Purpose and applicability.
19.80.005 Application and fee.
19.80.010 Repealed.
19.80.015 Hearing examiner procedures.
19.80.020 Powers and duties of the hearing examiner.
19.80.023 Repealed.
19.80.025 Appeals from decisions of the hearing examiner.
19.80.030 Repealed.
19.80.000
Purpose and applicability.
A. All properly filed appeals pursuant to the adopted codes of this title shall be heard by
the hearing examiner. The hearing examiner shall have no authority to review administra-
tive decisions or grant modifications to the provisions of any administrative chapter as
adopted by this title, nor can the hearing examiner waive a code requirement.
B. The term "code official" refers to the building official or fire marshal in exercise of
authority over applicable building and fire codes from this chapter.
C. The hearing examiner shall hear appeals from the code official's interpretation of the
adopted building codes, determinations of suitable alternative methods and materials, and
any other appeal pursuant to the state building codes and this code, including but not limited
to the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Fire
Code, the International Property Maintenance Code, the International Fuel Gas Code, the
International Mechanical Code, the Uniform Plumbing Code and any and all other codes
adopted pursuant to the direction and authority of Chapter 19.27 RCW.
D. The provisions of the state building codes as adopted by the city are not intended to
prevent the use of any material, alternate design or method of construction not specifically
prescribed by this code, provided any alternative has been approved and its use authorized
by the code official or on appeal or request for review by the hearing examiner.
E. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to hearing examiner proceedings under
ECDC Title 20 (land use hearings) unless such a hearing is required to be combined with a
hearing under this chapter, in which case the provisions of this chapter shall only apply to
the ECDC Title 19 portions of that combined hearing. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord.
3651 § 1, 2007].
19.80.005
Application and fee.
An application for appeal shall be filed with the code official upon a departmental form
within 10 days of the date of formal written decision. The application shall be accompanied
by the required fee as set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC and shall be complete in all aspects
before the hearing shall be scheduled. Failure to supplement an incomplete application
within 10 business days of filing shall constitute an incomplete application and the
19-67 Packet Pg. 153
4.5.a
19.80.010
administrative recourse of appeal shall be denied. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651
§ 1, 2007].
19.80.010
Board of appeals membership.
Repealed by Ord. 3926. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.80.015
Hearings examiner procedures.
A. Public Notice. Public notice shall be given of all hearings. Upon written receipt and
confirmation of a complete appeal of a request, notice shall be sent to the fire department,
the health department, the city attorney and the owner of the real estate and parties within
100 feet affected by the request. No hearing shall be scheduled until 15 days after the
required hearing notifications are mailed. Hearings shall be open to the public. The
appellant, the appellant's representative, the code official, and any person whose interests
are affected shall be given an opportunity to be heard.
B. Department/Interested Party. At any public hearing a representative of the city
building and fire department and any other interested party may appear in person, by agent
or by attorney, offer evidence and testimony and cross-examine witnesses. All evidence and
testimony shall be presented publicly. The hearing examiner may take judicial notice of
facts to the same extent and in the same manner as courts of record and may consider rele-
vant facts within the personal knowledge of any member of the board that are stated into the
record by such member.
C. Recording. All hearings shall be recorded. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651
§ 1, 2007].
19.80.020
Powers and duties of the hearing examiner.
A. The hearing examiner shall adopt rules and procedures governing all proceedings con-
sistent with the provisions set forth herein. The rules and regulations shall include meeting
location, meeting time, procedures, contents of a complete appeal application and time to be
allotted for each case.
B. Subject to the limitations enumerated herein, the hearing examiner shall have and may
exercise the following powers:
1. The hearing examiner shall have no authority relative to the interpretation of the
administrative provisions of any of the state building codes, nor shall the hearing examiner
be empowered to waive any requirement of any such code.
2. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit the hearing examiner to hear any
appeal, nor any request for deviation of design or alternative methods with respect to any
property lying within a recognized landslide hazard and earth subsidence area or which is
otherwise subject to the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC including effecting map
changes.
3. The hearing examiner, on review, may approve the use of any material, alternate
design or method of construction providing that it finds that the proposed design is satis-
factory and complies with the provisions of this code and that the material, design, or
method is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the
(Revised) 19-68
Packet Pg. 154
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.80 AN)
applicable code in suitability, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, safety and
sanitation. The decision of the code official shall not be overturned unless the hearing
examiner shall find that the following conditions exist:
a. That the appellant properly applied for an appeal;
b. That sufficient evidence, proof or testing reports were submitted by the appellant
that substantiated claims of equivalency;
c. That the proposed modification or alternate will not weaken the general purpose
of the adopted code;
d. That the proposed modification or alternate will be in harmony with the spirit
and purpose of the adopted code;
e. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the public
health and safety;
f. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the struc-
tural integrity of the building; and
g. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the fire
safety of the building.
4. To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any notice or order
made by the code official and/or fire marshal in the enforcement of the adopted codes in this
title. The hearing examiner shall have the power to stay the enforcement of any order issued
by the building and/or fire prevention department unless the code official certifies that a
stay of the order or denial would, in the opinion of the code official, cause imminent peril to
life or property. A stay shall not constitute hearing examiner approval, shall be personal to
the appellant and not transferable, and shall be subject to the terms and conditions imposed
by the hearing examiner. Any determination or order of the building and/or fire department
shall be presumed to be correct until evidence is introduced that would support a contrary
determination.
5. Whenever the owner or legally responsible person of an alleged unsafe building,
structure, utility or other condition does not agree with the order from the code official
and/or fire marshal as to the correction to be made, he shall have the right to appeal to the
hearing examiner within 10 days from the date of said order. In his appeal, the appellant
shall state how he proposes to make the unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition
safe and the hearing examiner may require the appellant to submit detailed engineering
analysis or recommendations, accompanied by plans and specifications prepared by a state
licensed architect or registered professional engineer, as prescribed in this adopted code.
The hearing examiner, in hearing such appeals, may require substantiating data concerning
the removal or other remedial steps to be taken to render the unsafe building, structure,
utility or other condition safe. In any matter in which an order or notice relating to an unsafe
building, structure, utility or other condition is appealed, the building and/or fire department
may certify to the hearing examiner that the unsafe building, structure, utility or other
condition could become an imminent hazard, in which case the hearing examiner shall
schedule a hearing within five business days to hear said appeal.
C. Burden of Proof.
1. The appellant bears the burden of proof in any proceeding before the hearing
examiner. If there is insufficient evidence of compliance with any of the provisions of this
code or evidence that any material or construction does not conform to the requirements of
this code, the appeal from the decision of the code official shall be denied.
19-69 Packet Pg. 155
4.5.a
19.80.023
2. The hearing examiner may continue any proceeding in order to permit the appellant
to provide proof of compliance through tests conducted in accordance with general engi-
neering practice and best scientific evidence. Such tests shall be made by the appellant and
at no expense to the jurisdiction. Test methods shall be as specified by the applicable
building code or by other recognized testing standards. If there are not recognized and
accepted test methods for the proposed alternate, testing methods shall utilize generally
accepted engineering practice and best scientific method. Reports of such tests shall be
retained and made a part of record of the proceedings.
D. Decision of the Hearing Examiner.
1. The hearing examiner shall render formal written decisions within 10 days of the
date of the hearing. Every decision of the hearing examiner shall be based upon findings of
fact and every finding of fact shall be supported in the record of its proceedings. A mere
finding or recitation of the enumerated conditions unaccompanied by findings of specific
facts shall not be deemed findings of fact and shall not be deemed compliance with the
code. The code official shall take immediate action in accordance with the decision of the
hearing examiner.
2. Copies of the decision shall be forwarded to the appellant, a copy shall be placed in
the appeal file and copies shall be made available to any person as a matter of public
information. Decisions shall be filed with the building or fire department as a matter of pub-
lic record.
3. In the exercise of the powers described above, the hearing examiner may reverse or
affirm, wholly or in part, or may modify the order, requirements, decision or determination
appealed from the hearing examiner, may impose conditions or requirements as deemed
necessary and may hold cases in abeyance until proper information needed by the hearing
examiner is supplied. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.80.023
Alternate to board of appeals.
Repealed by Ord. 3926. [Ord. 3740 § 1, 2009].
19.80.025
Appeals from decisions of the hearing examiner.
A. The filing of a land use petition for review shall not stay proceedings upon the
decision appealed but the court may grant a stay in accordance with the Land Use Petition
Act.
B. All decisions of the hearing examiner are appealable by Land Use Petition Act to
Snohomish County superior court. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.80.030
Snohomish County regional board of appeals.
Repealed by Ord. 3926. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
(Revised) 19-70
Packet Pg. 156
4.5.a
Edmonds Community Development Code 19.85 AM
Chapter 19.85
PENALTIES
Sections:
19.85.000 Applicability.
19.85.000
Applicability.
The provisions of all adopted codes within this title shall be subject to penalties as
described herein.
It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or other organization to erect, construct,
enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or
maintain any building or structure in the city, or cause the same to be done, contrary to or in
violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. Any person, firm, corporation or other
organization violating any of the provisions of this title as adopted herein, or other provision
of this chapter, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be deemed guilty of a separate
offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the
provisions of this title herein is committed, continued or permitted, and upon the conviction
thereof of such violation, and each violation thereof such person, firm, corporation or other
organization, and the officers, directors and managers thereof shall be punishable as set
forth in ECC 5.50.020 and Chapter 20.110 ECDC.
Nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the discretion of the city to seek any other
available civil, statutory or common law remedies. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord.
3651 § 1, 2007].
19-71 Packet Pg. 157
4.5.a
19.90.000
Chapter 19.90
LIMITATION OF BENEFITED AND PROTECTED CLASSES
Sections:
19.90.000 Limitation of benefited and protected classes.
19.90.000
Limitation of benefited and protected classes.
The building and supplemental codes adopted by this title are for the purpose of pro-
viding for and promoting the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Nothing in
this title shall be interpreted to create or otherwise establish any particular class or group of
persons who will or would be especially protected or benefited by the adoption of any code
in this title. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
(Revised) 19-72
Packet Pg. 158
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.9501()
Chapter 19.95
CONVERSION CONDOMINIUMS
Sections:
19.95.010 Definitions.
19.95.020 Relocation assistance.
19.95.030
Violations.
19.95.040
Civil penalty.
19.95.050
Enforcement.
19.95.010
Definitions.
The following words and phrases used in this chapter shall have the meaning set forth in
this section:
A. "Condominium" means real property, portions of which are designated for separate
ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the
owners of those portions. Real property is not a condominium unless the undivided interests
in the common elements are vested in the unit owners, and unless a declaration and a survey
map and plans have been recorded pursuant to this chapter.
B. "Conversion condominium" means a condominium (1) that at any time before creation
of the condominium was lawfully occupied wholly or partially by a tenant or subtenant for
residential purposes pursuant to a rental agreement, oral or written, express or implied, for
which the tenant or subtenant had not received the notice described in subsection (2) of this
definition; or (2) that, at any time within 12 months before the conveyance of, or acceptance
of an agreement to convey, any unit therein other than to a declarant or any affiliate of a
declarant, was lawfully occupied wholly or partially by a residential tenant of a declarant or
an affiliate of a declarant and such tenant was not notified in writing, prior to lawfully
occupying a unit or executing a rental agreement, whichever event first occurs, that the unit
was part of a condominium and subject to sale. "Conversion condominium" shall not
include a condominium in which, before the effective date of the ordinance codified herein,
any unit therein had been conveyed or been made subject to an agreement to convey to any
transferee other than a declarant or an affiliate of a declarant.
C. "Declarant" means any person who:
1. Executes as declarant the document, however denominated, that creates a condo-
minium by setting forth the information required by RCW 64.34.216 and any amendments
to that document; or
2. Reserves any special declarant right in the declaration; or
3. Exercises special declarant rights or to whom special declarant rights are trans-
ferred; or
4. Is the owner of a fee interest in the real property which is subjected to the declara-
tion at the time of the recording of an instrument pursuant to RCW 64.34.316 and who
directly or through one or more affiliates is materially involved in the construction, mar-
keting, or sale of units in the condominium created by the recording of the instrument; or
5. Undertakes to convert, sell, or offer for sale units in a conversion condominium.
D. "Director" means the development services director or his designee.
19-73 Packet Pg. 159
4.5.a
19.95.020
E. "Notice of conversion" means the 90-day notice pursuant to RCW 64.34.440(1)
required to be given by the declarant or his agent to residential tenants and subtenants in
possession of a portion of a conversion condominium.
F. "Person" means a natural person, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, trust,
association, or other legal entity.
G. "Tenant" or "subtenant" means any person who occupies and has a leasehold interest
in a rental unit under a lawful rental agreement, whether oral or written, express or implied.
H. "Unit" means a physical portion of the condominium designed for separate ownership,
the boundaries of which are described pursuant to RCW 64.34.216(1)(d). [Ord. 3926 § 1
(Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.95.020
Relocation assistance.
A. Declarant shall pay relocation assistance of $500.00 per unit to tenants and subtenants
who elect not to purchase a unit and who are in lawful occupancy for residential purposes of
a unit, and whose monthly household income from all sources, on the date of the notice of
conversion, was less than an amount equal to 80 percent of the monthly median income for
comparably sized households in the Seattle -Everett Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area,
as defined and established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
B. The household size of a unit shall be based on the number of natural persons actually
in lawful occupancy of the unit on the date of the notice of conversion.
C. The tenant or subtenant actually in lawful occupancy of the unit shall be entitled to the
relocation assistance.
D. Relocation assistance shall be paid on or before the date the tenant or subtenant
vacates and shall be in addition to any damage deposit or other compensation or refund to
which the tenant is otherwise entitled. Unpaid rent or other amounts owed by the tenant or
subtenant to the landlord may be offset against the relocation assistance.
E. Rights of tenants and subtenants set forth in the notice of conversion pursuant to RCW
64.34.440(1) must set forth tenants' and subtenants' right to relocation assistance as pro-
vided in this section. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.95.030
Violations.
It shall be a violation of this chapter for a declarant to fail or refuse to comply with the
provisions of this chapter. Each tenant and subtenant who is subjected to a violation of the
provisions of this chapter shall constitute a separate violation. Each day of violation shall
constitute a separate violation. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.95.040
Civil penalty.
Any person who fails or refuses to comply with the provisions or requirements of this
chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty in the amount of $100.00 per violation per day
from the date that the violation is first committed until the declarant complies with the
requirements of this chapter. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
(Revised) 19-74
Packet Pg. 160
Edmonds Community Development Code
4.5.a
19.95 nci)
19.95.050
Enforcement.
A. Tenants and subtenants subjected to violations of the provisions of this chapter, or
their agents, may file a complaint with the director. The director is authorized and directed
to receive complaints and conduct such investigations as are deemed necessary such as
contacting declarants and seeking explanation for apparent violations.
B. Whenever it is determined that there has been a violation of this chapter, the director is
authorized to pursue, at the director's discretion, enforcement of the code pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 20.110 ECDC. [Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19-75 Packet Pg. 161
4.5.b
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE STATE BUILDING CODE
AND TITLE 19 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE, ENTITLED `BUILDING CODES."
WHEREAS, the state building code is adopted by the state to consist of the following
codes, which are adopted by reference in RCW 19.27.031, subject to various exceptions and,
provisos which are further described in RCW 19.27.031: a
as
• The International Building Code, published by the International Code Council,
Inc.;
N
• The International Residential Code, published by the International Code Council, r
Inc.;
• The International Mechanical Code, published by the International Code Council,
Inc., except that the standards for liquefied petroleum gas installations shall be
NFPA 58 (Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases) and ANSI
Z223.I/NFPA 54 (National Fuel Gas Code);
• The International Fire Code, published by the International Code Council, Inc.,
including those standards of the National Fire Protection Association specifically
referenced in the International Fire Code;
• Except as provided in RCW 19.27.170, the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform
Plumbing Code Standards, published by the International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials;
• The rules adopted by the council establishing standards for making buildings and
facilities accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities or elderly
persons as provided in RCW 70.92.100 through 70.92.160; and
• The state's climate zones for building purposes are designated in RCW
19.27A.020(3) and may not be changed through the adoption of a model code or
rule; and
Packet Pg. 162
4.5.b
WHEREAS, the state building code is in effect in every city and county in the state of
Washington unless amendments to the state building code are adopted at the local level; and
WHEREAS, the city council is authorized to amend the state building code as it applies
within the City of Edmonds as long as the minimum performance standards of the codes and the
objectives enumerated in RCW 19.27.020 are not be diminished by any of the city's
amendments; and
WHEREAS, the city's building official has recommended several amendments to the
state building code; NOW, THEREFORE, a
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
d
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 19 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Building
Codes," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Attachment A hereto, which is incorporated
Q.
herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is E
shown in stfile through).
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
Packet Pg. 163
4.5.b
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
Im
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 164
4.5.b
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE STATE BUILDING CODE AND TITLE 19 OF THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, ENTITLEDCL
"BUILDING CODES.".
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.'
DATED this day of 12016. N
M
T
Q.
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
M
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY E
Packet Pg. 165
4.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Change Order with Razz Construction, Inc. for the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Rob English
Background/History
On February 9, 2016, Council awarded the contract for the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project to Razz
Construction.
On May 17, 2016, Staff provided a project update and preliminary budget to the City Council for
additional repairs to the Fishing Pier.
On June 14, 2016, staff presented this item to Council and it was forwarded to the June 21st consent
agenda for approval.
Staff Recommendation
1). Increase the total Project Budget to $1,900,000.
2). Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract change order for $227,078 to complete additional repair
work.
Narrative
The City's Contractor for the Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project uncovered extensive damage along the
pier edges during the initial phase of demolition work. Substantial damage was found in the existing
rebar and concrete due to moisture penetration within the interior of the pier structure. The amount of
damage was beyond the scope of work and contract price of the original construction contract.
The Contractor's cost proposal to complete the additional repair work is $429,110. The cost will be
partially offset by decreasing Bid Item 3 for Edge Spall/ Delamination Repair by $109,800 and deleting
Bid Item 14 for Unexpected Repair Work for $92,232. The total cost of the Change Order is $227,078.
In addition to the change order cost for the repair work, costs related to construction management and
other construction changes are necessary to complete the project. The total project budget is now
estimated at $1.9M and the extra costs are outlined in the attached revised budget.
The City has secured additional funding from the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office
to pay for the increased project cost.
Attachments:
Copy of Budget Summary - 06-9-16 REV with WDFW
Packet Pg. 166
Draft Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Budget Summary 6/8/2016
Contract Number: E4MB/c443
Funding Source
Funding Amount
132 Parks Fund
$100,000.00
Direct Appropriation WDFW
$800,000.00
Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account Funding
$500,000.00
WDFW
$50,000.00
Proposed Additional RCO Funding
$450,000.00
Total Funding
$1,900,000.00
Expenses - Contractor
F/A
DetTnermine
ate
Total Amount
EstimatedAdditional
Costs
Contract Days
Contract Award
$917,185.00
$917,185.00
76
CO #1 - Temp Lighting
$3,834.08
$3,834.08
0
CO #2 - Edge Repair Investigation
X
$7,964.57
$7,964.57
0
CO #2/CCD #3 - Nav Light Bases, Bollards & Junction Box
X
$82.55
TBD
$2,000.00
0
CCD #4 - Galvanized Guard Rails & Light Poles
-$8,898.01
-$8,898.01
0
CCD #5 - 3 x 8 Trestle Railings
-$321.52
-$321.52
0
CCD #9 - Mob/Demob for WF Festival
X
$2,776.46
$2,776.46
0
RCI #5 - ADA Guardrail Modifications/3 x 8 Pier Railings
$11,444.90
$11,444.90
0
RCI #9 - Two Extended Wind Shelters
$8,757.38
$8,757.38
TBD
RCI #10 - Weather Display Enclosure Heater
$363.31
$361.31
0
RCI #11 - Light Pole Wiring
$439.03
$439.03
0
RCI #12 - Edge Repair Pier
$372,196.46
$372,196.46
49 ???
Bid Item 14 - Unexpected Repair Work
-$84,000.00
-$84,000.00
0
Bid Item 3 - Edge S all/Delamination Repair, 500 of 525 SF
-$100,000.00
-$100,000.00
0
RCI #13 - Anodes at Joint Repair
$18,613.51
$18,613.51
TBD
RCI #14 - Guardrail Support Angle
$683.22
$683.22
0
RCI #16 - Pier Electrical Outlets
$1,847.20
$1,847.20
0
Change Order No.1, Exhibit A
Page 1 of 1
Attachment: Copy of Budget Summary - 06-9-16 REV with WDFW (1324 : Fishing Pier Rehab Change Order)
Printed: 6/9/2016
RCI #17 - Work Platform Costs for Bid Item 3
$37,710.91
$37,710.91
0
Project Management Costs for Additional Repairs
$38,616.81
$38,616.81
N/A
Expedited Schedule - 6 Day Week, Complete 2 Weeks Early
X
TBD
$26,000.00
TBD
Total Adjustment
$1,229,295.86
$1,229,211.31
$28,000.00
Sales Tax @ 9.8%
1 $120,470.991
$120,462.711
$2,744.00
Total Contractor Expenses Plus Tax
1 $1,349,766.85
$1,349,674.021
$30,744.00
Expenses - Consultants & Agencies
To Date
Total Amount
Additional Costs
Status
Interpretive Signs (including tax) - City/WDFW
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Project Management - WDFW
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$1,000.00
Estimated at 20%
Engineering - Berger ABAM
$56,802.95
$78,544.00
$36,100.00
Proposal
Construction Management - HWA
$21,910.00
$61,376.00
$6,609.00
Proposal
Testing Lab Services - Krazan
$4,530.00
$24,685.00
$17,750.00
Proposal
Staff Time Thru April
$25,466.83
$35,000.00
$21,000.00
Estimated at 60%
Total Consultant Expenses
$138,709.78
$229,605.00
$82,459.00
Total Funding Available
Total
Current
$1,900,000.00
Total Expenses Determined & Estimated
Total
Total Expenses
$1,692,482.02
Management Reserve
$207,517.98
Total Expenses + Contingency
$1,900,000.00
% of Grant Funding for A & E Services
16.42 %
Change Order No.1, Exhibit A
Page 1 of 2
Attachment: Copy of Budget Summary - 06-9-16 REV with WDFW (1324 : Fishing Pier Rehab Change Order)
Printed: 6/9/2016
4.7
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Ordinance Amending ECC 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System) to Clarify the Definition of
Misuse and to Amend the Penalty Provisions
Staff Lead: Jim Lawless
Department: Police Services
Preparer: James Lawless
Background/History
Draft ordinance was presented to Council during the June 14, 2016 Work Meeting. Council forwarded to
Consent Agenda of the June 21, 2016 Business Meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends and requests that this draft ordinance be carried forward to the June 21, 2016
Council Business Meeting for adoption by full Council via Consent Agenda.
Narrative
Edmonds City Code 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System) has been in effect in its current
form since 1999. Many of the provisions and penalties called for in the current ordinance are
impractical and/or not possible.
The amendments presented clarify the definition of misuse in order to better reflect the current
technology and impacts of such abuse. In addition, the amendments provide for a subject who has
abused 911, thereby creating a risk to public safety, to be charged with a misdemeanor. There are
numerous examples of individuals tying up 911 emergency lines with non -emergent calls. In the most
egregious cases, subjects call multiple times, even after being directed not to do so. Within the past
several months, one example involved a subject calling 911 seventy-three times within a 12 hour patrol
shift. It is situations such as this that these amendments are intended to address.
This ordinance have been prepared and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office.
Attachments:
FINAL Ordinance Clarifying and Amending Penalty Provisions of ECC 5.214.22.16
Packet Pg. 169
4.7.a
[1 '71 AMEN A [$I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ECC 5.21 (MISUSE OF THE 911 OR EMERGENCY
CALL SYSTEM) TO CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF "MISUSE"
AND TO AMEND THE PENALTY PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has determined that there is a need for clarification of
the definition of "misuse" in ECC 5.21 (Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System); and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has determined that there is a need to amend the
penalty provisions of that code section; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds wishes to revise ECC 5.21 to clarify the definition of
"misuse" and amend the penalty provisions as recommended by City staff; NOW, THEREFORE,
AS FOLLOWS:
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
Section 1. Section 5.21 of the ECC Misuse of the 911 or Emergency Call System is
hereby amended to read as follows (deleted text in strike -through; new text in underline):
5.21.010 Purpose.
This chapter is intended to reduce the number of false requests for emergency assistance
or similar misuse of the 911 emergency response system which occur within the city and
result in waste of city resources and/or the creation of a public safety by providing
for certain penalties for such misuse.
5.21.020 Definitions.
The following persons or words used in this chapter shall be defined as set forth in this
section:
A."Person" includes any natural person, partnership, joint stock company,
unincorporated association of society, or corporation of any character whatsoever; and
B. "Misuse of the 911 system" is a request for emergency response when no actual
emergency exists and when the caller does not have a good faith basis to request
-1-
Packet Pg. 170
4.7.a
m
emergency assistance. This definition includes false reporting, as that term is defined u3i
under RCW 9A.84.040, and telephone harassment, as that term is defined under RCW
r
9.61.230. This chapter shall not be applicable to mechanical activations of requests for
LO
assistance which are dealt with in Chapter 5.20 ECC, nor shall it be interpreted to impose v
liability on any person who makes a good faith request for emergency assistance based on w
0
a reasonable factual basis that an emergency situation exists. c
5.21.030 Misuse of the 911 system - Designated.
It shall be unlawful for any person to misuse the 911 system. It shall be an affirmative
defense that the person charged has a good faith, reasonable factual basis for the request.
5.21.040 Misuse of the 911 system - PeesPenalties.
Unless otherwise provided in this chapter or by state statute adopted by reference, any
person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon
conviction thereof, be sentenced to a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or 90 days in jail.
�- - - - - -IN
MONSOON W.
IRWIN
-2-
Packet Pg. 171
4.7.a
m
3
3. if three or- more fesponses to a r-esidenee oeeef within a si* menth pefiod based upon
N
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after
passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
-3-
Packet Pg. 172
4.7.a
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
JEFFREY B. TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
m
3
N
2
Packet Pg. 173
4.7.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ECC 5.21 (MISUSE OF THE 911 OR EMERGENCY
CALL SYSTEM) TO CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF "MISUSE"
AND TO AMEND THE PENALTY PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2016.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
m
N
2
-5-
Packet Pg. 174
4.8
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05 to Add Certain Penalty Provisions Relating to Animal Bites
Staff Lead: Jim Lawless
Department: Police Services
Preparer: James Lawless
Background/History
Draft ordinance was presented to Council during the June 14, 2016 Work Meeting. Council forwarded to
Consent Agenda of the June 21, 2016 Business Meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends and requests that this draft ordinance be carried forward to the June 21, 2016
Council Business Meeting for adoption by full Council via Consent Agenda.
Narrative
Edmonds City Code 5.05.040 (Animal bites to be reported) has been in effect since 2004. In its current
form, there is a requirement to "promptly" report animal bites to animal control. This amendment
would require the reporting of animal bites within twenty-four (24) hours by any owner or person
having control over said animal.
The ordinance in its current form has no provision for any penalty should an animal bite go unreported.
In the past, there have been several examples of animal bites occurring and the owner or person having
control over the animal reporting the bite, e.g. fleeing the scene. This causes great hardship to the
person having been bitten as there is no information on the immunization status of the animal, often
requiring additional medical treatment beyond simply treating the bite itself.
There have also been examples of animals causing significant injury to the victim, with the owner fleeing
the scene and not taking responsibility for the incident. One particular, high -profile, incident occurred
on August 19, 2015 where a child was attacked by a dog and the owner fled. It was only after a
significant investigation by the animal control unit, with the assistance of the detective unit, as well as a
press release that included the suspect's photograph, that the suspect was ultimately identified.
The amendments to this ordinance would also make it a crime (misdemeanor) for failing to report an
animal bite as required.
This ordinance have been prepared and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office.
Attachments:
FINAL Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05 to add Penalty Provisions 5.12.16
Packet Pg. 175
4.8.a
[1 '71 M141 A [$I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ECC 5.05 (ANIMAL CONTROL) TO ADD CERTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS RELATING TO ANIMAL BITES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has determined that there is a need for certain penalty
provisions in the City of Edmonds' Animal Control regulations, ECC 5.05, relating to animal bites; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds wishes to revise ECC 5.05 to add such penalty
provisions as recommended by City staff; NOW, THEREFORE,
AS FOLLOWS:
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
Section 1. Subsection .040 of ECC 5.05 Animal Control is hereby amended to read as
follows (new text in underline, deleted text in strike -through):
5.05.040 Animal bites to be reported.
A. Every animal which bites a person shall, within twenty-four (24) hours, be
prompt!!,; reported by any owner or person having Charge of said animal to the
animal control authority and shall thereupon be securely quarantined at the
direction of the animal control authority for a period of 10 days. At the discretion
of the animal control authority, such quarantine may be on the premises of the
owner, at the shelter designated as the city's animal shelter or, at the owner's
option and expense, in a veterinary hospital of the owner's choice. When an
animal's owner is unknown, such quarantine shall be at the shelter designated as
a city animal shelter or at a veterinary hospital.
B. Any owner or person having charge of any animal who fails to report an animal
bite as required herein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction
thereof, be sentenced to a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or 90 days in jail.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
-1-
Packet Pg. 176
4.8.a
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after
passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
:1
JEFFREY B. TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
-2-
Packet Pg. 177
4.8.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ECC 5.05 (ANIMAL CONTROL) TO ADD CERTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS RELATING TO ANIMAL BITES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2016.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
-3-
Packet Pg. 178
4.9
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Ordinance Amending ECC 8.32 to Add Inattentive Driving Section
Staff Lead: Jim Lawless
Department: Police Services
Preparer: James Lawless
Draft ordinance was presented to Council during the June 14, 2016 Work Meeting. Council forwarded to
Consent Agenda of the June 21, 2016 Business Meeting.
Staff recommends and requests that this draft ordinance be carried forward to the June 21, 2016
Council Business Meeting for adoption by full Council via Consent Agenda.
Washington State no long has an RCW entitled "Failure to Use Due Care/Caution" as it was struck down
as being Constitutionally vague. This has limited the option for officers when dealing with certain driving
offenses and/or collision investigations. Often times, the only current option is to cite the offending
driver for Negligent Driving 2nd Degree, which carries a penalty of $550 as opposed to a rules of the
road violation where the infraction penalty is $136 in non -collision situations and $187 when the
infraction results in a collision. This issue is particularly of concern in those situations where officers are
investigating collisions that occur in parking lots (a regular occurrence) and not on a roadway. State law
does not always allow for a driver to be cited in a parking lot (private property) in the same manner in
which they can on a public roadway, even when the same offense has been committed.
In addition to the above scenario, there are often times where drivers are using wireless
communications devices or hand-held mobile telephones while driving. As the current RCW (46.61.667
& 46.61.668) is written, so long as the person is not texting or talking with the phone being held to their
ear, they cannot be cited, no matter how unsafe the driving is. This includes individuals using mapping,
searching and reading applications on their devices.
Many jurisdictions have adopted ordinances to address these issues and entitled them Inattentive
Driving. Once such jurisdiction is the City of Lynnwood, and utilizing their ordinance as a model, the City
Attorney's Office has prepared a draft ordinance the would amend ECC 8.32, adding an Inattentive
Driving Section.
The goal is to promulgate an ordinance that would allow the officers to cite an offending driver, when
appropriate, without having to cite under such a penalty heavy RCW (Negligent Driving). The officer
would also be able to address unsafe driving when necessary and now cite, where the current RCW does
not adequately address these issues.
This ordinance has been prepared and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office.
Packet Pg. 179
4.9
Attachments:
FINAL Ordinance Amending ECC 8.32 to Add Inattentive Driving Section 5.12.16
Packet Pg. 180
4.9.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 8.32 TO ADD AN
"INATTENTIVE DRIVING" PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, after review and discussion, the City Council has determined that it
is appropriate to amend Chapter 8.32 of the Edmonds City Code (`BCC") to add an "inattentive
driving" provision; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following subsection .015 shall be added to Section 8.32 of the
ECC Miscellaneous Driving and Traffic Rules:
8.32.015 Inattentive Driving.
A. It shall be unlawful to drive a motor vehicle on any street, alley or way open
to the public of the city of Edmonds in an inattentive manner.
B. For the purposes of this section, "inattentive manner" means the operation of a
motor vehicle in a manner that evidences a lack of: (1) that degree of attentiveness
required to safely operate the vehicle under prevailing conditions, including, but
not limited to, the nature and conditions of the roadway, the presence of
pedestrians, or the presence of other traffic; or (2) that degree of attentiveness as
will allow the driver of a motor vehicle to observe anything resting on or traveling
on the road in time to take appropriate action as circumstances require.
C. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall have committed a
traffic infraction, punishable as an unscheduled infraction pursuant to Infraction
Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (IRLJ) Rule 6.2(b), plus all statutory
assessments.
Packet Pg. 181
4.9.a
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being legislative in nature and an
exercise of a power delegated to the City as a corporate entity, is subject to initiative or
referendum, and shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage and publication of an approved
summary thereof consisting of the title.
/.\»:Z6]LTA9103
MAYOR, DAVID O. EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 182
4.9.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ECC 8.32 TO ADD AN
"INATTENTIVE DRIVING" PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of 52016.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 183
4.10
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Bid results for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection Improvements Project
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Backgr+ound/History
On June 14, 2016, staff presented this item to Council and it was forwarded to the June 21st consent
agenda for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Reject all construction bids received for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection Improvements Project.
Narrative
On June 9, 2016, the City received two construction bids for the 76th Ave & 212th St. Intersection
Improvements project. Trimaxx Construction submitted the apparent low bid of $5,116,721 to
complete the project. The bid is approximately $1.27M over the engineer's estimate of $3,841,297.
Staff recommends rejecting all construction bids received for the project and re -advertising the project
in early 2017.
Packet Pg. 184
4.11
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with KPG for the 236th St. SW Walkway
project.
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On May 20, 2014, Council authorized Mayor to sign an agreement with KPG for design of walkway
improvements on 236th St SW.
On June 14, 2016, staff presented this item to Council and it was forwarded to the June 21st consent
agenda for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement with KPG.
Narrative
On December 4, 2014, a contract was executed with KPG for the design of the 236th St SW Walkway
improvements. The total amount payable for this contract was $65,944.85.
On December 31, 2015, this contract expired with only $53,741.54 having been expended.
In early 2016, City staff identified a need to widen 236th St SW by 2 feet to create a safer corridor for
both motorized and non -motorized users. On March 7, 2016, a new contract was executed with KPG
with a total amount payable of $40,752.41. The scope of this contract included design services necessary
to complete the sidewalk project, services for engineering support during the bidding phase and
additional design services for the widening and overlay of 236th St SW. At the time, the project was
expected to bid out in late spring of 2016 and go to construction in early summer.
On May 18, 2016, City staff met with the Edmonds School District after they raised concerns about their
plans to build new school buildings and site improvements at Madrona School. During this meeting, the
District confirmed it did not want the City's project to build sidewalk, as proposed in 2014, on District
property. The change in the District's position centered on the new site plan and the determination
that this segment of sidewalk would be demolished during construction of the new school. The District
also raised concerns about the possibility of existing trees being damaged or lost, if the City's portion of
sidewalk was built.
During the ensuing weeks, City staff, KPG and the District have worked together to develop an alternate
alignment that is acceptable to the School District and satisfies the requirements of the Safe Routes to
School grant that the City won for the 2361h St SW project. The alignment has been designed and City
Packet Pg. 185
4.11
staff is working with the various agencies involved with the project in hopes of bidding the project in
time for construction in late summer, 2016.
Before construction begins, a supplemental agreement with KPG must be executed in order to secure
their services for engineering support during construction. The City has negotiated a consultant fee of
$14,972.67 for these services. The key tasks within the scope of work include on -call construction
engineering, development of a record of materials, submittal reviews, RFI's and development of record
drawings.
Attachments:
KPG Supplement
Packet Pg. 186
4.11.a
AM
� Washington State
�I/ Department of Transportation
Supplemental Agreement
Number 1
Original Agreement Number
8325
Project Number
Organization and Address
KPG, Inc
753 9th Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109
Phone: 206.286.1640
Execution Date
March 7, 2016
Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable
Madrona Elementary Walkway Project $55,724.81
Description of Work
Completion Date
December 31, 2016
SRTS 0365(11)
City of Edmonds Madrona Elementary Walkway Project - Provide on call engineering support during
construction.
The Local Agency of the City of Edmonds
desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with
and executed on March 7 2016 and identified as Agreement No. 8325
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
See Exhibit A-1 attached.
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days
for completion of the work to read: No change to final completion date.
III
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
Payment for this work shall not exceed $14,972.67 in accordance with Exhibit 13-1 attached.
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above,
spaces bel w a ret o this office for final action.
By: By:
Consultant Signature
please sign in the Appropriate
Approving Authority Signature
DOT Form 140-063
Revised 09/2005
Date
Packet Pg. 187
4.11.a
Exhibit "A"
Summary of Payments
Basic
Agreement
Supplement #1
Total
Direct Salary Cost
10377.91
2684.14
13062.05
Overhead
(Including Payroll Additives)
13645.91
3529.38
17175.28
Direct Non -Salary Costs
10475.00
250.00
10725.00
Fixed Fee
3113.37
805.24
3918.61
Total
37612.18
14972.67
52584.85
r
Q
DOT Form 140-063
Revised 09/2005
Packet Pg. 188
4.11.a
Exhibit A-1
City of Edmonds
Madrona Elementary Walkway Project
Supplement No. 1
Construction Engineering Support
Scope of work
May 18, 2016
This supplement is provided to provide on -call engineering support during construction of the
Madrona Elementary Walkway Project.
Task 9: On call Construction Engineering
The Consultant shall provide on -call Construction Engineering support services for the Madrona
Elementary Walkway Project. All effort on this project will be as requested by the City. It is
anticipated that budgets between Tasks will be adjusted as required to provide the requested
services. The Consultant shall provide notification and receive written approval prior to exceeding
the approved total project budget. The scope of services and associated cost of services (Exhibit
B-3) are based upon the assumptions outlined below.
A. The Consultant shall provide project management of consultant staff and prepare progress w
reports to be included with the monthly invoices. U)
r
B. The Consultant shall prepare the Record of Materials (ROM) for use by City staff during N
construction. ti
M
C. Prepare for and attend pre -construction conference with the City, Contractor, and affected 77
r
utilities. Meeting arrangements will be by the City.
D. The Consultant shall provide the on -call field support to the City inspector for the duration of
construction. The level of effort for field support time is estimated at 4 site visits.
E. The Consultant shall review material submittals and RFI's provided by the Contractor as
requested by the City. Submittals pertaining to contractor means, methods, and
sequencing (traffic control, erosion control, etc.) will be reviewed by the City.
F. The Consultant shall review change conditions as they arise and make recommendation to
the City for field changes/change orders.
G. Prepare Record Drawings for the Madrona Elementary Walkway Project based on redline
drawings provided by the City.
Deliverables:
Items to be provided by the Consultant:
• Record of Materials (ROM)
• Documentation from site meetings, change conditions, and field directives.
• Change orders, if required.
■ Full size Record Drawing .pdf
Packet Pg. 189
4.11.a
O
a
a
m
N
rn
C
U N
a) a!
a c
T W
a1
O
ai U
a+
O O
yaU
W a a)
c Er
Q O
_ W y O
W E N
W coax
W
LU LL Ucn2
0
Z
Q ..
� V
m .L
0
= M
OOr � r�
N CO r N O o W
d COO M O Lo COO � r O
LL o) Ln T r O Ln O r r Oa
N V N C7 a'f
O
O j N
F .-
U
W 63 V3 EA Efl EH en fA EA Cfl 0
Lo0 NC7v cO r.
rocsoo
0 o N �.Nc�i
0
d (o
-p o 7 O C7 11, N
L 0) co N CO7 r CNVN 00 LLn
N r
M
0 r
N Cc V V (O n N
0 ('o I- r 0) (A
i � N
co
J
Cc cm c\j
N c
cl) co
O M
2
Ch
U �
.a N V CIO Cr O'N d
r
U �
c
M Lo
L N O O�iO O tit N
69
T (NO
ZNLr) O O O O O o O O
tl7 (n U
R �
m O_ O (ND
11 N cC T
7 0U' 1 N ('7 0 0 0 7 O O qc
o a
E O J (n 6q
D di
Q T
c:
� c
WO N O co .N.- N M O le
... n
O
U Ln
O C R O N N V 00 tt N
aca
2v) Ili
N O
o a� c?
N O 0 N N N O co
W 6cm
I
C
C
C p
LLI '—
a ID
C '.0 a E
O 0 0 O O
n � 0 a te' w
a)
H U N a O •—
_ = N W cd: c yy
E ro a 3 2 m Q
r
c0 C j 0
0 to 2 (V N N O N c
U -0 am W 0- CL I n 9 "1
dO N 2' N Q7
d d 0- co LL_ ' d, W a:
W
Y
w p¢mUmUmU,m
p �2
Y N
N
Packet Pg. 190
4.12
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Repeal ECC 10.5 Dissolving Library Board
Staff Lead: Hite
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Carrie Hite
Background/History
In 2015, Council set a goal to review and analyze the Boards and Commissions that work in an advisory
capacity to the City Council. Council discussed this several times in 2015. One of the Mayor's
recommendations that the Council considered was to disband the library board.
Council discussed again at the Council retreat in 2016 and asked staff to bring back an ordinance
dissolving the Library Board.
Council forwarded this for approval on consent on June 14, 2016.
Staff Recommendation
Approve on consent.
Narrative
The Library Board was originally formed before the Edmonds Library became part of the Sno-Isle Library
System. Its mission was to advise the Mayor and City council on the policies, rules, and regulations of the use
of the library and its facilities; and the budget, administration, and scope of services provided by the library.
Since formally becoming part of the Sno-Isle system several years ago, all of those regulatory functions are
managed directly by the Sno-Isle system and its library board. The Edmonds Library Board is now largely
symbolic advocacy group and has no clear charter or authority.
Although all of the board members are passionate about the importance of the library and its services, the
board recognizes that the advocacy role is already filled by the Edmonds Friends of the Library. The Library
Board supports the Mayor's recommendation to dissolve the board at this time.
Attachments:
2016-06-07 Edmonds library board ordinance
lettertocitycou nci I_12-2015_rev
Packet Pg. 191
4.12.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE
EDMONDS CITY CODE AND DISSOLVING THE CITY'S
PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds annexed to the Sno-Isle Library District in 2001; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has a public library board that advises the mayor and
city council at least annually; and
WHEREAS, the 2001 Library Annexation Agreement specifically references the
existence of the city's public library board in Section 7; and
WHEREAS, the district is able to effectively operate and manage the library without the
advice of the city's public library board; and
WHEREAS, both the mayor and the city's public library board are recommending that
the board be dissolved and that the code sections related to the board be repealed;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 10.50 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Public Library Board," is
hereby repealed and the city's public library board is hereby dissolved.
Section 2. The city's 2001 Library Annexation Agreement with the Sno-Isle Regional
Library District should be amended to reflect the board's dissolution.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Packet Pg. 192
4.12.a
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 193
4.12.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REPEALING CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE
EDMONDS CITY CODE AND DISSOLVING THE
CITY'S PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2016.
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
3
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 194
4.12.b
T']Im E. Healy901 Bell St., Edmonds, WA 98020
Home: 425-673-7187
Cell: 425-971-5482
E-mail: Tim.Healy@edmondswa.gov
December 17, 2015
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
Edmonds City Council
City Hall
121 5th Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE: Mayor's recommendation to the Edmonds City Council to "De -formalize or disband the Library
Board"
Dear Council President Fraley-Monillas and members of the Edmond City Council:
At the December 7, 2015 meeting of the Edmonds Library Board, the board discussed a recommendation by
Edmonds Mayor Dave Earling to de -formalize or disband the library board as part of an effort to reduce costs
associated with the large number of city sponsored boards and commissions. After extensive debate and
discussion, the board voted four to one to support the Mayor's recommendation to disband the library board.
The board was originally formed before the Edmonds Library became part of the Sno-Isle Library
System. Its mission was to advise the Mayor and City council on the policies, rules, and regulations of
the use of the library and its facilities; and the budget, administration, and scope of services provided by
the library. Since formally becoming part of the Sno-Isle system several years ago, all of those
regulatory functions are managed directly by the Sno-Isle system and its library board. The Edmonds
Library Board is now largely symbolic advocacy group and has no clear charter or authority.
Although all of the board members are passionate about the importance of the library and its services,
we recognize that the advocacy role is already filled by the Edmonds Friends of the Library. We
believe the resources currently used to staff and administer the Edmonds Library Board would be best
allocated to other boards or commissions with a clear mandate to truly advise the Mayor and City
Council.
So on behalf of myself and board members Joyce Hudemann, Joanne Peterson, and Susan Schalla, I
respectfully ask that the Edmonds City Council accept the Mayor's recommendation to disband the
Edmonds Library Board.
Sincerely,
Tim E. Healy
Edmonds Library Board
Packet Pg. 195
4.13
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Ordinance Amending Edmonds City Code Chapter 10.95 - Citizens' Tree Board
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: City Council
Preparer: Andrew Pierce
Background/History
In 2010, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 3807 establishing the Citizens' Tree Board.
Council discussed this at the 6/14 Council meeting and resolved to amend the language as provided in
the attached Ordinance.
Staff Recommendation
None
Narrative
The Citizens' Tree Board Chair has the ability to specify the board's own meeting time and place. In
addition, the code currently specifies that the annual report is required in December.
Below are excerpts from the original code and suggested new language after reviewing the code with
the current Tree Board Members:
10.95.020 Officers of board - Meetings - Forum.
...The regular public meeting of the board shall be held at such time or place as may be determined by
the chair or a majority of the members of the board. [Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010].
SUGGESTION: The language could be changed to: The Edmonds Tree Board shall meet on the first
Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. at such locations as it shall establish throughout the city of
Edmonds.
NOTE: This language is consistent with some other commissions (Sister City) but the original language is
also consistent with other commissions (Cemetery Board).
10.95.030 Powers and duties. SUGGESTIONS:
A. The board is empowered to advise and make recommendations to the mayor and city council and, as
appropriate, to the planning board and other boards or commissions of the city on such matters
including but not limited to:
1. ^^velepiRg a The board may assist in developing a tree ordinance or an Urban Forest Management
Program desigRed to help preserve and protect existing trees, encourage planting of additional trees,
safeguard trees on parcels where construction or renovation is occurring or planned to occur, and
Packet Pg. 196
4.13
encouraging the Edmonds citizenry to become active stewards of the urban forest.
2. Increasing community outreach and education regarding the value of trees, proper selection of trees,
and correct methods for planting of and caring for trees.
3. Working with civic, religious, and citizen groups to organize invasive plant removal and native
vegetation planting in accord with the department of parks, recreation and cultural services.
4. Coordinating with other citizen groups to specific projects.
5. Facilitating relevant grant applications supporting ecology and watershed protection projects.
6. Sponsoring an annual Arbor Day Event.
7. Working towards achieving and maintaining a SAT Tree City USA' status.
10.95.030 B. The board shall provide an annual report to the city council within the first quarter iR
December of each year. [Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010].
NOTES for SUGGESTIONS:
10.95.030.1: The board is neither the administration nor Council and therefore should not have any
power to develop code.
10.95.030.7: The City has achieved the Tree City USA status and the board should now attempt at
maintaining this prestigious designation.
10.95.030 B: Given the nature of December City Council Meeting schedules and the Tree Board's past
annual reports not occurring in December, this language is more acceptable.
Attachments:
2016-06-16 tree board ordinance Update
Packet Pg. 197
4.13.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS THAT
GOVERN THE CITIZENS' TREE BOARD.
WHEREAS, the City has achieved the Tree City USA status and the citizens' tree board
should now seek to maintain this prestigious designation; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to have the board's regular meeting time established by
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the first quarter of the year works better than the month of December as a
time for the board to report to the city council; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 10.95.020 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Officers of board —
Meetings -- Forum," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in strike thr-o g ):
10.95.020 Officers of board — Meetings — Forum.
Members of the board sew shall meet and organize by election, from the
members of the board, a chair and vice chair and other officers as may be determined by the
board. It shall be the duty of the chair to preside at all meetings. The vice chair shall perform this
duty in the absence of the chair. A majority of the filled positions on the board shall constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business. The beafrl is expeeted to meet monthly ^ other -wise
agreed to by the board. The regular- publie meeting of the board shall be held at stieh time er--
The board
shall meet regularly on the first Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. at such location within the
city of Edmonds as it shall establish from time to time.
Packet Pg. 198
4.13.a
Section 2. Section 10.95.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Powers and duties," is
hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
40.95.030 Powers and duties.
A. The board is empowered to advise and make recommendations to the mayor and city
council and, as appropriate, to the planning board and other boards or commissions of the city on
such matters including but not limited to:
1. The Commission may assist in dDeveloping a tree ordinance and an Urban Forest
Management Program designe to help preserve and protect existing trees, encourage planting of
additional trees, safeguard trees on parcels where construction or renovation is occurring or
planned to occur, and encouraging the Edmonds citizenry to become active stewards of the urban
forest.
2. Increasing community outreach and education regarding the value of trees, proper
selection of trees, and correct methods for planting of and caring for trees.
3. Working with civic, religious, and citizen groups to organize invasive plant removal
and native vegetation planting in accord with the department of parks, recreation and cultural
6YO"IFIRIC-1-1
4. Coordinating with other citizen groups to specific projects.
5. Facilitating relevant grant applications supporting ecology and watershed protection
projects.
6. Sponsoring an annual Arbor Day Event.
7. Working towards achieviagement and maintaining a of Tree City USA® status.
B. The board shall provide an annual report to the city council in Deee,.,. be f within the
first quarter of each year.
Packet Pg. 199
4.13.a
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect
thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 200
4.13.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS THAT
GOVERN THE CITIZENS' TREE BOARD.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of 12016.
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
Arl
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 201
5.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Commendation to Honor Sandy Chase for Her Years of Service to the City of Edmonds (10 Min.)
Staff Lead: Andrew Pierce
Department: City Council
Preparer: Andrew Pierce
Background/History
The Council wishes to commend Sandy Chase for her years of dedicated and honorable service to the
City of Edmonds.
Staff Recommendation
Draft of Commendation forthcoming.
Narrative
N/A
Packet Pg. 202
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/21/2016
Closed record review and action on the Planning Board's recommendation to approve a City -sponsored
rezone of 21802 98th Ave. W from Open Space (OS) to Single Family Residential (RS-8) in File No.
PLN20160019. (15 min.)
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Mike Clugston
The purpose of this City -sponsored project is to rezone the subject parcel from Open Space (OS) to
Single Family Residential (RS-8) to bring zoning for the site into agreement with the Comprehensive Plan
and the existing use on the site.
Rezones are Type IV-B permits where the Planning Board conducts a public hearing and forwards a
recommendation to the City Council for closed -record review and a final decision.
Adopt the ordinance in Exhibit 3 approving the rezone.
While reviewing a building permit for a nearby site, staff noticed that the subject parcel was zoned Open
Space (OS) rather than Single Family Residential (RS-8) like the parcels surrounding it on the east side of
98th Avenue West north of 220th Street SW. The parcel used to be the site of an old City -owned water
storage facility and so was zoned Open Space. However, that facility was removed in the late 1960s,
which was confirmed by Public Works. The parcel should have been rezoned from Open Space to Single
Family Residential at that time but wasn't. Despite that, in 1971 the City approved a building permit for
the existing single family residence on the lot (BLD19710149) and later a pool in 1976 (BLD19760367).
Exhibit 1 contains the draft minutes from the June 8 Planning Board public hearing
Exhibit 2 is the staff report to the Planning Board with attachments
Exhibit 3 is the rezone ordinance approved by the City Attorney as to form
Attachments:
Ex 1 - Draft minutes from June 8 Planning Board public hearing
Ex 2 - Staff report to the Planning Board
Ex 3 - Ordinance approved to form
Packet Pg. 203
7.1.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
June 8, 2016
Chair Lovell called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety
Complex, 250 — 5`h Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Philip Lovell, Chair
Carreen Rubenkonig, Vice Chair
Matthew Cheung
Alicia Crank
Nathan Monroe
Daniel Robles
Valerie Stewart
Samuel Kleven, Student Representative
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Todd Cloutier (excused)
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Mike Clugston, Senior Planner
Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
Jerry Bevington, Video Recorder
Karin Noyes, Recorder
BOARD MEMBER STEWART MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF MAY 25, 2016 BE APPROVED AS
SUBMITTED. VICE CHAIR RUBENKONIG SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
Chair Lovell added a discussion about the Development Services Director's Report to Planning Board under "New
Business." The remainder of the agenda was accepted as presented.
RI1171 Bl>,[y D[4111u iu 104010
No one in the audience indicated a desire to comment during this portion of the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONE AT 21805 — 98TH AVENUE WEST
Chair Lovell explained that the purpose of the open record hearing is for the Planning Board to address the rezone application
to rezone the property located at 21805 — 9$`h Avenue West from Open Space (OS) to Single Family Residential (RS-8). He
opened the public hearing and read a script that outlined the rules and procedures for the hearing. He emphasized that
members of the public who would like to speak at any future appeal on the matter would need to testify during the hearing to
preserve their ability to participate in the future. He reminded the Board of the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine and asked if
any member of the Planning Board had engaged in communication with opponents or proponents regarding the subject of the
hearing outside of the hearing process. All of the Board Member answered no. Next, Chair Lovell asked if any of the Board
Members had a conflict of interest or believes that he/she cannot hear and consider the application in a fair and objective
Packet Pg. 204
7.1.a
manner, and all of the Board Members answered no. Lastly, he asked if anyone in the audience had an objection to any of the
Board Members participating as a decision maker in the hearing, and no objections were made.
Chair Lovell explained that because the Planning Board is making an evidentiary record that may be relied upon in the future,
it is important that they ask any and all questions of speakers during the hearing. One of the most important purposes of the
hearing is to ensure that all relevant facts are brought to light through the process. Upon Chair Lovell's direction, everyone
who planned to testify at the hearing affirmed that the testimony he/she would provide would be the truth, the whole truth and
nothing but the truth.
Mr. Clugston referred the Board to the Staff Report, which included the following attachments:
• Attachment 1 — Zoning Map
• Attachment 2 — Aerial Photograph
• Attachment 3 — State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist and Determination of Non -Significance (DNS)
• Attachment 4 — Public Notice Documentation
Mr. Clugston explained that the purpose of the City -sponsored application is to rezone the parcel from Open Space (OS) to
Single Family Residential (RS-8) to bring the zoning for the site into agreement with the Comprehensive Plan and the
existing uses on the site. He advised that while reviewing a building permit for a nearby site, staff noticed that the subject
parcel was zoned OS rather than RS-8 like the parcels surrounding it on the east side of 98`h Avenue West north of 220`h
Street SW. The parcel used to be the site of an old City -owned water storage facility and was zoned OS. When the facility
was removed in the late 1960s, the parcel should have been rezoned from OS to RS-8, but it was not. Despite that, in 1971,
the City approved a building permit for the existing single-family residence on the lot. A permit for a pool was later
approved in 1976.
Mr. Clugston referred to the Staff Report, and reviewed the criteria that the Board must consider when reviewing rezone
applications:
A. Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Clugston pointed
out that the entire area is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Single Family Urban, and either RS-8 or RS-10
zoning would be compatible with this land -use designation.
B. Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and whether
the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district Mr. Clugston said staff believes the
proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and the proposed zone district. The existing uses
on the parcel have been going on for many years and the rezone would simply change the zoning of the parcel to
reflect what is happening on the site.
C. Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land use and zoning of
surrounding or nearby property. Mr. Clugston advised that the current uses on the parcel are actually non-
conforming because the parcel was never rezoned in the 1970's from OS to RS-8. Changing the zoning, as
proposed, would bring the existing uses into conformance.
D. Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in
the city policy to justify the rezone. Mr. Clugston explained that, in this case, the site has been home to a single-
family residence for 45 years and there have not been any changes in the surrounding area during that time. The
area is still overwhelming developed as single-family residential uses. The proposed rezone would bring the site
into consistency with the remainder of the area.
E. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing
zone and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained
undeveloped compared to the surrounding area and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning. Mr. Clugston said
staff believes that RS-8 zoning is appropriate for the site, which has been the home of a residential use for 45 years.
Planning Board Minutes
June 8, 2016 Page 2
Packet Pg. 205
F. Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease
in value to the property owners. Mr. Clugston said that rezoning the subject parcel would bring it into agreement
with the Comprehensive Plan and make the existing development on the site conforming.
Based on the findings of fact, analysis, conclusions and attachments to the Staff Report, Mr. Clugston recommended the
Board make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the rezone request as presented.
Chair Lovell invited members of the audience to participate in the public hearing, but none came forward. As there were no
further questions from the Board, Chair Lovell closed the testimony portion of the hearing and invited the Board to begin its
deliberations.
Chair Lovell asked if the property owner is aware of and understands the proposed rezone. Mr. Clugston answered
affirmatively. Chair Lovell noted that there is an easement on the subject parcel that serves as access to the single-family
residential home located behind it. He asked if the owner of the subject parcel has jurisdiction over the access driveway. Mr.
Clugston said the owner of the subject parcel must have granted an easement to the owner of the rear parcel, but the easement
would not have any bearing on the proposed rezone.
Board Member Crank asked if there is documentation that affirms the fact that the property owner has been appraised of the
rezone application and agrees with it. Mr. Clugston said a letter was sent to the property owner and was included as an
attachment in the Staff Report. He also spoke to the property owner by phone. Board Member Cheung asked if the owner of
property behind the subject parcel was also notified of the change. Mr. Clugston answered that all property owners within
300 feet of the subject parcel were notified by mail, and a sign was posted on the site, as well. In addition, the rezone was
advertised on the City's website and in THE EVERETT HERALD. The rezone would not have any impact to the access
easement. The intent is to simply make what is already developed on the site conform to the Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Map.
Vice Chair Rubenkonig commented that, typically, jurisdictions handle rezones on a once -a -year basis. She asked if this is
the City's general policy, as well. Mr. Clugston answered that area -wide rezones and those that require a Comprehensive
Plan amendment are usually scheduled once a year, but site -specific rezones that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
are moved forward when the application is received.
Board Member Stewart asked about the size of the subject parcel, and Chair Lovell answered that it is 10,016 square feet.
Board Member Stewart pointed out that lots in the RS-8 zone must be a minimum of 8,000 square feet, and the portion of the
property that is identified as access easement would not be counted as part of the lot area. Mr. Clugston affirmed that the
subject parcel has sufficient lot area to meet the requirements of the RS-8 zone.
Board Member Stewart asked if the owner of the subject parcel has been paying property taxes based on the OS zoning. If
so, will the tax amount change when the property is rezoned? Mr. Clugston answered that he is fairly certain the property has
been taxed as a single-family residence for the past 45 years and only the zoning map is incorrect.
VICE CHAIR RUBENKONIG MOVED THAT THE BOARD ADOPT THE FINDINGS OF FACT, ANALYSIS,
CONCLUSIONS AND ATTACHMENTS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND FORWARD A
RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE
PROPERTY AT 21805 — 98TH AVENUE WEST FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(RS-8). BOARD MEMBER MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
DELIBERATION ON POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE EDMONDS SIGN CODE REGARDING THREE
POTENTIAL OPTIONS FOR DEALING WITH TEMPORARY SIGNS AND OTHER AMENDMENTS TO
ADDRESS A NUMBER OF MINOR CLARIFICATIONS AND CODE LANGUAGE UPDATESASSUES
Mr. Lien referred the Board to the staff report, and recalled that the following three options were presented at the public
hearing on May 25'h:
Planning Board Minutes
June 8, 2016 Page 3
Packet Pg. 206
CITY OF EDMONDS
121- 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT
FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
To: Edmonds Planning Board
From:
Michael Clugs on, AICP
Associate Planner
Date: June 1, 2016
File: PLN20160019
Hearing Date, Time, and Place:
I. INTRODUCTION
A. APPLICATION
1. Applicant: City of Edmonds
June 8. 2016. at 7:00 PM
Edmonds City Council Chambers
Public Safety Complex
250 - 5th Avenue North
2. Site location: 21805 98th Ave. W (Tax Parcel #: 27032500111700)
3. Request: The purpose of this City -sponsored project is to rezone the subject parcel
from Open Space (OS) to Single Family Residential (RS-8) to bring zoning for the site
into agreement with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing use on the site.
4. Review process:
a. Rezone (Type IV-B permit) — Planning Board conducts a public hearing and
forwards a recommendation to the City Council for closed -record review and a
final decision.
5. Compliance required with:
a. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.01 (Types of
Development Project Permits)
b. ECDC Chapter 20.15A (Environmental Review - SEPA)
c. ECDC Chapter 20.40 (Rezones)
City of Edmonds cQ Planning Board
m
a
z
Go
rn
LO
0
00
r
N
r
M
C
0
N
d
N
r
M
Packet Pg. 207
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND ANALYSIS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site Development and Zoning
a. Facts
Size: According to the County Assessor, 21805 98th Ave. W is 10,016 +/-
square feet.
ii. Zoning: The current zoning map dated April 2015 shows the subject parcel
as Open Space (Attachment 1).
iii. Land Use: There is a single family residence, pool and associated
appurtences at the subject site.
2. Neighboring Development and Zoning
a. Facts
L North/East/South: These parcels are all zoned Single Family Residential
(RS-8) and developed accordingly.
ii. West: Across 98th Ave. W, the parcels are all zoned Single Family
Residential (RS-10) and developed accordingly.
B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
1. Fact: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on May 10, 2016 (Attachment
3). No comments or appeals were received. Because this is a non -project action,
further environmental review may be required with subsequent requests for
specific project approvals.
C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE COMPLIANCE
1. ECDC Section 20.40 (Rezones)
a. Facts
While reviewing a building permit for a nearby site, staff noticed that the
subject parcel was zoned Open Space (OS) rather than Single Family
Residential (RS-8) like the parcels surrounding it on the east side of 98th
Avenue West north of 220th Street SW. The parcel used to be the site of an
old City -owned water storage facility and so was zoned Open Space.
However, that facility was removed in the late 1960s, which was confirmed
by Public Works. The parcel should have been rezoned from Open Space to
Single Family Residential at that time but wasn't. Despite that, in 1971 the
City approved a building permit for the existing single family residence on
the lot (BLD19710149) and later a pool in 1976 (BLD19760367).
ii. The existing use and structures on the site are nonconforming but would be
2
Packet Pg. 208
7.1.b
made conforming by the change in zoning from OS to RS-8.
iii. Requests to amend the official zoning map require compliance with ECDC
20.40 which includes SEPA review and public notice.
b. Analysis
The following is an analysis of the proposed rezone against the six decision
criteria as required in ECDC 20.40.010.
Whether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel
is designated Single Family Urban 1 and the RS-8 zone is one of the
implementing zones for that designation.
ii. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning
ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the
proposed zone district.
The proposed rezone is consistent with the zoning ordinance and RS-8 zone
district. As noted previously, all the parcels surrounding the subject parcel
east of 98th Ave. W are zoned RS-8.
iii. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and
zoning of surrounding or nearby property.
The current use at the parcel is nonconforming relative to the OS zone and
rezoning the site RS-8 will bring the use into conformance. The proposed
change will also bring the zoning into alignment with the surrounding
parcels.
iv. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate
or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone.
The subject parcel should have been rezoned prior to redevelopment in
1971. There has been no change in the single family neighborhood and
nearby uses since then.
v. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses
allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor
could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped
compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the some
zoning.
As with the immediately surrounding parcels, the subject parcel is
economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed in the RS-8 zone.
vi. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the
potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners.
Rezoning the subject parcel would bring it into agreement with the
Packet Pg. 209
7.1.b
Comprehensive Plan and make the existing development at the site
conforming.
D. PUBLIC COMMENTS
To date, no public comments have been received regarding the subject application.
III. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the Findings of Fact, Analysis and Attachments in this report, staff proposes that
the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to approve this request to
rezone 21805 98th Ave. W from Open Space (OS) to Single Family Residential (RS-8).
IV. ATTACHMENTS
1. Zoning map (April 2015)
2. Aerial photo of vicinity
3. SEPA checklist and Determination of Nonsignificance, issued May 10, 2016
4. Public notice documentation
V. PARTIES OF RECORD
Jesse Miles
21805 98th Ave. W
Edmonds, WA 98020
4
Packet Pg. 210
>
I I I
Q
- , .
216TH PL SW
--T
I
--Single
M
Family
Residential
area -of
(RS-10)
Proposed
Rezone W
Q
F—
LU
Q
219TH ST EN
VISTA PL
=
Single
Family
Residential
r(RS� S)
- 220TH ST
Sw
-- - - --- - --
01 EON
Zoning Map Correction
21805 98th Ave. W
PLN20160019
Zoning Map
N
1 inch = 150 feet
Attachment 1
PLN20160019 Packet Pg. 211
i QF Eb4,0
a
` v �6
U N
Jai°
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220
WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: The purpose of this City -sponsored project is to rezone the subject parcel from
Open Space (OS) to Single Family Residential (RS-8) to bring zoning for the site into agreement with the
Comprehensive Plan. The zoning for this parcel should have been changed after pubic facilities were
removed from the site and before a single family residence was approved and constructed in 1971. Site -
specific rezones are a Type IV-B decision with a public hearing before the Planning Board and closed -
record review and decision by the City Council.
Proponent: City of Edmonds
Location of proposal, including street address if any: 21805 98'h Ave. W (Tax ID # 27032500111700)
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection
have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted
under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as
provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied
that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created.
An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency. This information is available to the public on request.
XX There is no comment period for this DNS.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by
Project Planner: Mike Clugston, Associate Planner
Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Development Services Director
Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220
Date: May 10 2016 Signature..!/ �
C a r,C
XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Development Services Director, at 121
5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons
for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized
affidavit form no later than May 24. 2016. You should be prepared to make specific factual
objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
XX Posted on May 10 2016, at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety
Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA
Center (SEPAunit0).ecy.wa.gov). Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site.
XX Distributed notice to "Checked" Agencies below.
The SEPA Checklist, project plans, location map, and DNS are available at www.edmondswa.cov through the
Permits Online link. Search for file number PLN20160019. These materials are also available for review at the
Planning Division which is located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 5`h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020.
Page 1 of 2
SEPA DNS PLN20160019 DOCX
5/4/16 SEPA
Attachment 3
PLN20160019
Packet Pg. 213
7.1.b
XX Environmental Review Section
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Email: SEPAunit = eaLwa.gov
XX COMCAST
Outside Flant Engineer, North Region
1525 75t St SW Ste 200
Everett, WA 98203
XX Edmonc ;hoof District No. 15
Attn.: Planning and Property Manager
20420 68th Avenue West
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400
XX
XX
XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation
Attn: Ramin Paxooki
SnoKing Developer Services, MS 221 XX
15700 Dayton Ave. N.
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
XX Puget Sound Regional Council
Attn.: S.R.C.
1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98104-1035
XX Snohomish County Planning &
Development Services
3000 Rockefeller
Everett, WA 98201
XX Snohomish County Public Works
Attn.: Environmental Coordinator
3000 Rockefeller M/S 607
Everett, WA 98201
XX Snohomish County Fire District No. 1
Attn.: Director of Fire Services
12310 Meridian Avenue South
Everett, WA 98208-5728
Attachments
c: SEPA Notebook
Community Transit
Attn.: Brent Russell
7100 Hardeson Road
Everett, WA 98203
Dean Saksena, Senior Manager
Snohomish Co. PUD
PO Box 1107
Everett, WA 98206-1107
Donna J. Bunten
Department of Ecology
Shorelands & Environ. Assist. Program
PO Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
XX Kristin Kelly
Snoh. Co/Skagit Co. Program Director, Futurewise
Smart Growth Dir., Pilchuck Audubon Society
1429 Avenue D., PMB 532
Snohomish, WA 98290
Email: Kristin futurewise.or
XX Swedish Hospital
21601 76th Avenue West
Edmonds, WA 98026
Page 2 of 2
SEPA DNS PLN20160019.DOCX
5/4116 SEPA
Packet Pg. 214
0V ED4 7.1.b
s
C:iTY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist; is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Site -specific rezone to correct zoning map for parcel at 21805 98'" Ave. W
2. Name of applicant: City of Edmonds
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Mike Clugston, AICP, Associate Planner — 425.771.0220
City of Edmonds Development Services Department —121 5'h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020
4. Date checklist prepared: April 20, 2016
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Planning Board hearing and City Council closed -record review and decision — Spring 2016
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
None known
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None known
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Pending rezone, file # PLN20160019
m
Q
z
r
0
rn
0
0
0
r
N
m
c
0
N
d
N_
M
Page 1 of 10
environmental checklist pht20160019.doc:4.19.2016 Packet Pg. 215
7.1.b
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The purpose of this City -sponsored project is to rezone the subject parcel from Open Space (OS) to Single Family
Residential (RS-8) to bring zoning for the site into agreement with the Comprehensive Plan.
While reviewing a building permit for a nearby site, staff noticed that the subject parcel was zoned Open Space (OS)
rather than Single Family Residential (RS-8) like the parcels surrounding it on the east side of 98`" Avenue West north of
220th Street SW. The parcel used to be the site of an old City -owned water storage facility and so was zoned Open
Space. However, that facility was removed in the late 1960s, which was confirmed by Public Works. The parcel should
have been rezoned from Open Space to Single Family Residential at that time but wasn't. Despite that, in 1971 the City
approved a building permit for the existing single family residence on the lot (BLD19710149) and later a pool in 1976
(BLD19760367).
Site -specific rezones are a Type IV-B decision with a public hearing before the Planning Board and closed -record
review and decision by the City Council.
rn
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
tn
oco
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
coo
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
N
to this checklist.
SEC 25 TWP 27 RGE 03 - BEG NW COR SE1/4 SWI/4 NE1/4 TH N89*13 06E 30FT TO TPB TH N89*13 06E 100FT
04
THS01 *22 12E 100FT THS89*13 06 W I00FT THN01 *22 12W I00FT TO TPB.
c i
21805 98`" Avenue West (Tax ID: 27032500111700) — see attached map
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, .
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Less than 5% slope
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know
the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Alderwood Urban Land Complex, 2-8% slopes
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
None known
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source
of fill.
No grading proposed with rezone application
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Not applicable — no grading proposed
Page 2 of 10
environmental checklist pla20160019.doc: 4 19 2016 Packet Pg. 216
7.1.b
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
Not applicable — no change to impervious surface proposed
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
None — no changes proposed
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial
wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
None — no changes proposed M
t
00
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. M
0
No — none known 00
r
N
r
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: f°
m
c
None — not applicable N
m
3. WATER
N
r
M
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and M
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If m
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Cn
No
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
b. Ground:
Page 3 of 10
environmental checklist pin20160019 doc: 4 19 2016 Packet Pg. 217
7.1.b
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, it
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None — not applicable
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
m
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any Q
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
00
If so, describe. M
LO
None — not applicable 00
r
N
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. M
m
No changes proposed
0
N
d
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
None — no changes are proposed N
M
4. Plants
L
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Typical of a residential area m
✓ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
✓ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
a
✓ shrubs y
t
✓ grass o
0
pasture
0
a
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
N
other types of vegetation: w
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
None proposed
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
No landscaping proposed — no changes to site proposed
5. Animals
Page 4 of 10
environmental checklist p1n20160019 doc: 4.19 2016 Packet Pg. 218
7.1.b
a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site: Typical of a developed residential area
✓ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
ai
None known Q
z
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: rn
None — no changes proposed c
00
r
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a.
b.
m
What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed c
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. m
No changes proposed
N
r
Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
L
No 0
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
None
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
No
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
Typical noise from residential area
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise
would come from the site.
Page 5 of 10
environmental checklist pin20160019 doc:4192016 Packet Pg. 219
None — no changes proposed
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site has been home to a single family residence since 1971 and is surrounded by similar residential uses.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No
C. Describe any structures on the site.
The site contains a single family residence and a pool.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Open Space (OS)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Single Family Urban 1
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
None
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
No changes
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None — no changes
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None — not applicable
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
This rezone is intended to bring the zoning on the parcel into agreement with the Comprehensive Plan.
m
Q
t
0
M
0
0
0
r
N
M
m
c
0
N
d
N
r
M
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
No change
Page 6 of 10
environmental checklist pIn20160019 doc: 4 19.2016 Packet Pg. 220
7.1.b
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
No change
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle _
exterior building material(s) proposed?
No structures proposed
Q
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
M
00
M
None
`O
0
00
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
r
N
r
M
None
c
0
N
11. Light and Glare
a.
What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? r
M
No development is proposed
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Not applicable
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
No changes proposed
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Noneproposed
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Westgate Elementary School is within '/ mile of the subject site.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
No
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None — Not applicable
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
No
Page 7 of 10
environmental checklist pin20160019 doc: 4.19,2016 Packet Pg. 221
7.1.b
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
None
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Should archaeological materials or human remains be observed duringproject activities, all work in immediate
vicinity should stop. The State Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (360.586 3065), the Planning
Division (425.771.0220), and the County Coroner (if applicable) should be contacted immediately. Compliance
with all applicable laws (RCW 27.53, 27.44, & WAC 25-48) is required -failure to do so could constitute a Class
C Felony.
14. Transportation ai
Q
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
00
system. Show on site plans, if any. a)
LO
No change. The parcel has existing driveway access to 981" Ave. W. 000
r
N
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit a
stop?
0
No. Transit stops are located within `/4 mile to the east on 220'" Street SW and 961" Avenue W. 4)
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N
M
No change
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
No change
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None — not applicable
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No — no change
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
None
16. Utilities
Page 8 of 10
environmental checklist pin20160019 doe: 4 19 2016 Packet Pg. 222
7.1.b
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone,
sanitary sewer, sei�iie=svtci�►, �►>kf�cf:
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
No new utilities are proposed with the rezone.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to Q
make its decision. M
00
/ �j M
� ( 1 16 00
`n
N
Signature of Proponent Date Submitted M
m
c
0
N
d
W
N
r
M
Page 9 of 10
environmental checklist p1n20160019.doc: 4.19.2016 Packet Pg. 223
7.1.b
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
It will not — there is no new development proposed.
Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
N/A
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
It will not — there is no new development proposed.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
N/A
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
It will not —there is no new development proposed.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
N/A
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or
under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
5.
6.
7
It will not — there is no new development proposed.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
N/A
How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land
or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
The proposal will correct the zoning map and make it consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Enforcement of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
It will not — there is no new development proposed.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
N/A
Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
No conflicts are known.
m
Q
z
00
M
LO
0
00
r
N
r
M
m
c
0
N
m
N
r
M
Page 10 of 10
environmental checklist pin20160019. doc: 4 19 2016 Packet Pg. 224
7.1.b
SCANNED
CITY OF EDMONDS AFR 19 2015
1215th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.eov
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION
"�c. 18911
April 19, 2016
Jesse Miles
21805 98th Ave. W
Edmonds, WA 98020
Subject: ZONING MAP CLEAN UP— PROPOSED CHANGE AT 21805 98T" AVE. W
(PLN 20160019)
Dear Mr. Miles,
My name is Mike Clugston — I work with the City of Edmonds in the Development Services
Department. While recently reviewing a building permit for another nearby parcel, I noticed
that your parcel was zoned Open Space (OS) rather than Single Family Residential (RS-8) like the
parcels around you on the east side of 98th Avenue West (see the map on the back). This
seemed odd and it turns out that your parcel used to be the site of an old City -owned water
storage facility and so was zoned Open Space —that made sense. However, that facility was
removed in the late 1960s and the parcel should have been rezoned at that time from Open
Space to Single Family Residential because in 1971 the existing single family residence was
approved and built (permit BLD19710149) followed by the pool in 1976 (permit BLD19760367).
For whatever reason, the zoning map was never officially updated but now I need to clean up
the map and bring it into alignment with the use that has been going on at your parcel for the
last 45 years.
Unfortunately, I can't simply change the map administratively in the office so I'll need to take
the project to the Planning Board and City Council for their approval. As part of that, I must
post your property with a land use sign describing the project and notify your neighbors within
300' that this is happening. This work will be occurring over the next few months and the
outcome will be that your parcel will be rezoned from Open Space to RS-8, just like the rest of
the parcels on your side of the block. This change must take place before any additional
permits can be obtained for work at your site.
You don't need to do anything for this clean-up project to go forward but if you have any
questions, please contact me at (425) 771-0220 or michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov and we
can go over it in more detail.
Attachment 4
PLN20160019
Packet Pg. 225
Sincerely,
Mike Clugston, AICP
Associate Planner
Packet Pg. 226
CITY OF EOMONDS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND SEPA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
NAME OF PROPONENT: City of Edmonds
FILE NUMBER: PLN20160019
PROJECT LOCATION: 21805 98th Ave. W, Edmonds, WA
(Tax Parcel ID: 27032500111700)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this City -sponsored project is to rezone the
subject parcel from Open Space (OS) to Single Family
Residential (RS-8) to bring zoning for the site into 0
agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning for 00
this parcel should have been changed after pubic facilities
were removed from the site and before a single family
residence was approved and constructed in 1971. c
Site -specific rezones are a Type IV-B decision with a
public hearing before the Planning Board and closed -
record review and decision by the City Council.
PUBLIC HEARING: The hearing will be held before the Planning Board on
June 8, 2016 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at
250 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2) for the above project:
DATE DNS ISSUED: May 10, 2016
SEPA MATERIALS: The SEPA checklist, DNS and related materials are
available for review at the Planning Division, located on the
second floor of Edmonds City Hall, 121 5th Ave N,
Edmonds, WA 98020 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and
4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday (8:30 — 12:00 only on
Wednesday) or online at www.edmondswa.gov through
the Online Permits link on the Permit Assistance page.
Search for permit PLN20160019.
APPEAL PERIOD: You may appeal this determination by filing a written
appeal citing the specific reasons for appeal with the
required appeal fee no later than May 24, 2016 by
4:00 PM.
CITY CONTACT Mike Clugston, Associate Planner
michael.clu stun edmondswa. ov
425-771-0220
PUBLISH, May 10, 2016
Packet Pg. 227
7.1.b
logo
Pam
MIN
300' Mailing list buffer
21805 98th Ave. W
PLN20160019
Vicinity Map
a'
00
W)
CD
00
N
is
O
C
O
N
N_
M
A
N
1 inch = 300 feet
Packet Pg. 228
7.1.b
27032500115300
2703250011540027032500111000
FINLON DONNA J
MACLEOD JAMES J & LAURA SHEREE
REHFELDT DONALD & JOANNE
21820 98TH AVE W
BRUNT
BR
21812 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
912 SEA SEA VISTA TA PL
EDMONDS, WA
98020
98020
98020
27032500114200
27032500110400
27032500110000
WILLCOCK WILLIAM T
CAVAGNARO GLENNA DEE WILCOX
WAHL THOMAS & KIMBERLY A
918 SEA VISTA PL
21728 98TH AVE W
21708 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
EDMONDS,WA
EDMONDS, WA
98020
98020
98020
27032500109900
STINE TODD A & SARAH L
21702 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700300500
GERALD & HELEN ROWE
21719 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700300700
00559700300800
KLOPFENSTEIN JOSHUA E & KRISTIN
RAFIPOUR KEYKHOSROW
M
21807 97TH AVE W
21727 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
EDMONDS, WA
98020
98020
00559700301000
00559700200300
ALDIANO FELIPE S JR & MEHETABEL
WEIRAUCH PEGGY A
P
21701 98TH AVE W
21823 97TH AVE W
EDMODNS, WA
EDMONDS, WA
98020
98200
00559700200500
EMERY KARI & ANDREW
21715 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700200801
STEVENSON SANDRA J
21807 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700201000
NELSON ROBERT J & STEPHANIE A
21802 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700201300
NEWSOME KAREN
21714 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700200600
ROCHESTER LUCILE
21725 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700200800
SELGA BEVERLY & BAKKER
PATRICIA
21817 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700201100
RANSTROM RAY A
21726 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700201400
DURR BARBARA
21710 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
27032500111900
27032500111800
AUSTIN LAWRENCE R & MARY ANN
LUPTON MARTIN & JEANNINE
21822 97TH AVE W
21821 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
EDMONDS, WA
98020
98020
00559700300600
DEREZES TINA
21723 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700300900
GOW DAVID M
21819 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700200400
MEICHO CARY
21702 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700200700
KALAPACA PETER F
21729 98TH W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700200900
KRZESZOWSKI TRUST
18915 94TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700201200
OLSON GARY M
21718 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700201500
SMITH MILDRED M
21704 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
27032500111700
MILES JESSE DAVID
21805 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
Packet Pg. 229
7.1.b
27032500110900
VANHEE LEROY & PHYLLIS
LORRAINE TRUST
21804 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
27032500113600
BUCKLIN STEVEN & ELISA
910 SEA VISTA PL
EDMONDS, WA
98020
27032500113400
MARSH JOSEPH A
21716 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700301100
HOPPE RAYMOND H
9615 219TH ST SW
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700400800 27032500112100
GLASSBURN RICHARD & KATHLEEN MCCULLOCH JAMES C & VERNA R
21911 98TH ST W 21829 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA EDMONDS, WA
98020 98020
27032500111300
ENSTAD VIRGINIA
21824 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00637000000100
SHIGENO RONALD T & GLORIA H
21910 98TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
00559700400600
GOODEY NATHAN & KAITLIN
PHILLIPS
21900 97TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA
98020
27032500112000
SEILER PAUL R & CAROLINE R
1112 E ALDER LANE
MOUNT PROSPECT, IL
60056
Packet Pg. 230
7.1.b
File No.: PLN20160019
Applicant: City of Edmonds
DECLARATION OF POSTING
On the loth day of May, 2016, the attached Notice of Application and SEPA
Determination was posted as prescribed by Ordinance and in any event where
applicable on or near the subject property.
I, Michael D. Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws
of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this loth day of
May, 2016, at Edmonds, Washington.
Signed:
Packet Pg. 231
7.1.b
FILE NO.: PLN20160019
APPLICANT: CITY
DECLARATION OF MAILING NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING & SEPA DETERMINATION
On the 1 Oth day of May 2016, the attached Notice of Public Hearing & SEPA Determination was
mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the
above -referenced application.
I, Diane Cunningham, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this loth day of May 2016 at Edmonds,
Washington.
Signed:
{BFP747887.D0C;1\00006.900000\ }
Packet Pg. 232
7.1.b
Everett Daily Herald
Affidavit of Publication
State of Washington)
County of Snohomish } ss
Kathleen Landis being first duly sworn, upon
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the first publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH698633 PLN20160019 as
it was published in the regular and entire issue
of said paper and not as a supplement form
thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such
publication commencing on 05/10/2016 and
ending on 05/10/2016 and that said newspaper
was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period.
The amount of the fee for such publication is
$67.08, -
Subscribed and sworn before me on this
-/0 day of
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington.
City of Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416
DIANE CUNNINGHAM
DEBRA ANN GRIGG
Notary Public
State of Washington
My Commission Expires
October 31, 2017
Packet Pg. 233
CITY OF EDMONDS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND WA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
NAME OF PROPONENT: Oita[ Edmonds
FILE NUMBER: PLl'120160019
PROJECT LOCATION: �2T4805 ax 00 Pars. W. Edmonds, WA
2500111100)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: norpulrpose o1 We Wily -sponsored
SipproJecl is to rezone the sub1act parcel Irom Open Space [OS] to
nglo Family Residentlat (RS•S) to bringg zon all. for the site into
agreement with the Comprehensive Pfan.The zoning for thla
parcel should have been changed attar pubic facllltras were
removed from the site and before a singte family residence was
sTprovedand constructed In 1971•
.Sle-apec[ffc rezanea are a Type IV-B decision with a public
hearing before the Planning Board and closed -record review and
dach4on by the Clly Council.
PUBLIC NEARING: The haar1n will be held before the Planning
Board on Jung 6. 2016 at 7 p.m. In the Council Chambers
located at 250 51h Ave. N. Edmonds. WA 98020
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Cty of Edmonds has issued
a Dale rminatton at Nonslgniticanoe pursuant to WAC 197-11-
B40 2] for the above project:
DAT� ONSISSUED:May10,2016
SEPA MATERIALS: The SEPA cheekllS1, DNS and related
materlais are avellable for review at the Ptanaingg Division,
located on the "cand floor of Edmonds City Hall, f21 51h Ave
N, Edmonds, WA 98020 between the hours of 6:00 A.M. and
4.30 P.M. Monday through Friday (8:30 - 12:00 only on
Wednesday or online at through The
Online Parm is flak on the rmlt Ass stance page. Search for
permlt12LN20160019.
APPEAL PERTOD:You may appeal lb Is deter min a eon by liling a
welitea appeal citing the Sped 11G reasons fora eat with the
required appeal fee no later than May 24, 2018 by 4: PM.
CITY CONTACT: M1ke�Clu atom, Associateiate Pler
d2S771u2� EDH698633
ubllshed: May 10, 2016.
m
Q
z
00
rn
to
0
00
fV
fC
C
O
N
0)
ii
x
w
c
m
E
z
U
r
Q
Packet Pg. 234
7.1.c
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
AND APPROVING A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR ONE
PARCEL LOCATED AT 21805 98' AVENUE WEST FROM
OPEN SPACE (OS) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-
8); AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE CITY' S OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Planning
Board, which after an open -record public hearing on June 8, 2016, is recommending approval of
a rezone of one parcel comprising 10,016 square feet, more or less, located at 21805 98tn
Avenue West from Open Space (OS) to Single -Family Residential (RS-8); and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the minutes of the hearing before the
Planning Board, which were attached to the council agenda memo as Exhibit 1; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Planning Division Advisory Report,
Findings, Analysis, and Recommendation dated June 1, 2016, which was attached to the council
agenda memo as Exhibit 2; and
WHEREAS, a closed -record hearing on the Planning Board's recommendation
was held by the City Council on June 21, 2016; and
WHEREAS, this rezone will bring the existing legally permitted single family
residence and appurtenances on the parcel into conformance and bring the zoning of the subject
parcel into agreement with the Comprehensive Plan; and
-1-
Packet Pg. 235
7.1.c
WHEREAS, the property at 21805 981h Avenue West is depicted in a zoning map
included as Attachment 1 to the Planning Division Advisory Report, Findings, Analysis, and
Recommendations dated June 1, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council agrees with the Planning Board's analysis
that the proposed rezone is in the public interest and satisfies all applicable criteria of the
Edmonds Community Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. For its findings and conclusions in support of the rezone effected by
this ordinance, the City Council hereby adopts by reference the findings and conclusions
contained in the Planning Division Advisory Report, Findings, Analysis and Recommendations
dated June 1, 2016 (File No. PLN20160019).
Section 2. The parcel located at 21805 981h Avenue West, Washington and shown
on the attached zoning map (Exhibit A) is hereby rezoned from Open Space (OS) to Single -
Family Residential (RS-8). Exhibit A attached hereto is hereby incorporated by this reference as
if herein set forth in full.
Section 3. The Development Services Director or designee is hereby authorized
and directed to make appropriate amendments to the Edmonds Zoning Map in order to properly
designate the rezoned property as Single -Family Residential (RS-8) pursuant to Section 2 of this
ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
-2-
Packet Pg. 236
7.1.c
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
M.
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVID O. EARLING
-3-
Packet Pg. 237
7.1.c
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVING A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR ONE PARCEL
LOCATED AT 21805 981h AVENUE WEST FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-8); AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE CITY'S
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2016.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 238
7.1.c
Exhibit A
See attached zoning map
-5-
Packet Pg. 239
7.1.c
>
Q
216TH PL SW
H
Single
Family
CO
Residential
Area -of
(RS_ 10)
Proposed
Rezone W
>
Q
W
>
Q
219TH ST
VISTA pL
=
Single
CO
Family
Residential
-----------
(RSL 8)
-22OT-H----- ST SW
-_--- -
°p EDito
ell
Zoning Map Correction
21805 98th Ave. W
PLN20160019
Zoning Map
Q
00
CD
LO
0
00
N
r
R
N
a
O
N
N
N_
M
O
4-
0
d
O
0
M
x
w
E
a
N
1 inch = 150 feet
Packet Pg. 240