2016-08-23 City Council - Full Agenda-17391.
2.
3.
4.
5
6
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
AUGUST 23, 2016, 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of August 16, 2016
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 16, 2016
3. Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Anne Johnson ($500,000.00), and Frontier
(amount undetermined).
4. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
1. Economic Development Commission Presentation (20 min.)
2. Edmonds School District Foundation Presentation on Youth Homelessness (15 min.)
AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON
THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS
STUDY ITEMS
1. Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals (60 min.)
2. Presentation of the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (15 min.)
3. Stormwater Management Code Update, Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter
18.30 (20 min.)
4. Authorization to contract with James G. Murphy to sell surplus city equipment (5 min.)
ACTION ITEMS
1. Authorization to modify an Agreement with the Cold Spring Granite Company for the Veteran's
Plaza (10 min.)
2. Presentation of Bids and Award for Downtown Restroom (5 min.)
REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
COUNCIL COMMENTS
CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(1)
Edmonds City Council Agenda
August 23, 2016
Page 1
13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION.
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
August 23, 2016
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of August 16, 2016
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
08-16-2016 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
AUGUST 16, 2016
The City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the
Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The Council then convened in the Jury
Meeting Room.
Elected Officials Present
Kristiana Johnson, Council President
Mike Nelson, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Tom Mesaros, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Mayor Earling
Others Present
Mary Ann Hardie, HR Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING PER RCW 42.30.140(4)(A).
The City Council adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to discuss collective bargaining per RCW
42.30.140(4)(a).
I\ 13Lei 0-,,]
O
The meeting was adjourned at 6:54 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 1
Packet Pg. 4
4.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of August 16, 2016
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
08-16-2016 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 5
4.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
August 16, 2016
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Kristiana Johnson, Council President
Michael Nelson, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Scott James, Finance Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Andrew Pierce, Legislative/Council Assistant
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5"' Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Council President Johnson advised the presenter for Item 5.1 will arrive at approximately 8:00 p.m.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER, MOVING ITEM 5.1 TO
ITEM 8.1. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda items approved are as follows:
APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 2, 2016
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 9, 2016
3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 9, 2016
4. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM BRUCE WHITE
(AMOUNT UNDETERMINED)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 1
Packet Pg. 6
4.2.a
5. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS
6. JUNE 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
7. SENIOR CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
5. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
2. PRESENTATION OF NATIONAL CITIZEN SURVEY RESULTS
Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick Doherty provided background:
• Pursuant City Council approval and funding, the National Citizen Survey, administered by the
National Research Center (NRC), was conducted between 6/3/16 and 7/17/16 in Edmonds
• Survey is conducted in a scientifically valid, statistically significant fashion
• Surveys were sent to 2,200 randomly selected households
• Online, opt -in survey was open from 7/1/16 to 7/17/16
• Responses to the randomized survey totaled 586, or 28%, within 20-40% national average.
• Constitutes statistically significant survey response.
• 320 online responses were received
• 906 total responses
• Results were combined since both samples were most similar in NRC's national experience
• Increased confidence level to only 3% margin of error
Mr. Doherty described the Community Livability Report:
• NRC conducts detailed analysis and draws conclusions in so-called "Community Livability
Report"
• 3 pillars of community:
o Community characteristics
o Governance
o Participation
• Across eight central facets of community:
o Safety
o Mobility
o Natural Environment
o Built Environment
o Economy
o Recreation and Wellness
o Education and Enrichment
o Community Engagement
• Benchmarking
o Comparison against nationwide averages
o Comparison against 25 Pacific NW cities 20,000 to 60,000 population
o Compare/contrast across 5 demographic cohorts:
■ Length of residency in Edmonds
■ Annual household income
■ Rent or own dwelling unit
■ Age
■ Gender
He provided summary conclusions:
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 2
Packet Pg. 7
4.2.a
• Overwhelming majority of residents gave Edmonds a resounding thumbs -up!
• Indicators of Quality of Life
0 93% - Overall image
0 86% - Neighborhood
0 92% - Place to raise children
0 87% - Place to retire
0 96% - Overall appearance
• Edmonds is a great place to live, with 9 in 10 residents positively rating overall image, overall
appearance and Edmonds as a great place to raise children, among other attributes. Ninety-six
percent of respondents rated Edmonds as an excellent or good place to live, much higher than
responses in nationwide surveys and those from throughout the Pacific Northwest.
• Safety is an asset and a priority, with 9 in 10 residents stating they feel safe in Edmonds and also
identifying safety as a priority to focus on in coming years.
• The economy is important to residents and highly rated in Edmonds. About 8 in 10 residents
rated the City's economic health as positive, although it is recognized that more jobs in Edmonds
for Edmonds residents would be desirable as only 3 in 10 work in the city.
• The City supports a culture of diversity and opportunities for citizen engagement. At least three-
quarters of residents gave excellent/good ratings to opportunities for cultural/arts/events
engagement. Also, up to 6 in 10 felt that the City has high levels of community engagement and
is open to people of diverse backgrounds.
• Respondents rated the following well above national averages:
o Ease of walking
o Overall natural environment
o Air quality
o Vibrant downtown area
o Mental health care
o Healthcare
o Adult education
o Traffic flow
o Cleanliness
o Public places
o Places to visit
o Preventative health services
o Cultural/arts/music activities
o Social events and activities
• Only one category ranked lower than national averages:
o Affordable quality housing
Mr. Doherty reviewed responses to five customized questions, unique to Edmonds:
• How likely or unlikely would you be to support increased local public funding for the following
transportation -related services in Edmonds?
o Repair/replacement of existing sidewalks — 86% favorable
o Repair and/or maintenance of City streets — 88% favorable
o Construction of new sidewalks — 84% favorable
o Expansion of bicycle facilities — 59% favorable
• How likely or unlikely would you be to support increased local public funding for the following
parks and recreation -related services in Edmonds?
o Acquisition of parkland, beachfront — 77% favorable
o Capital projects such as Civic Field, Marina Beach Park, etc. — 83% favorable
o Upgrading Frances Anderson Center — 79% favorable
o Upgrading maintenance levels of existing parks — 85% favorable
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 3
Packet Pg. 8
4.2.a
• Please indicate whether or not you currently experience discrimination in Edmonds based on
your:
o Sexual orientation or gender identity — 2%
o Disability — 3%
o Religion — 3%
o National origin — 3%
o Race — 4%
o Gender — 3%
o Age — 5%
How likely or unlikely would you be to support increased funding to enhance the following
Edmonds Police -related services?
o Domestic violence services — 89% favorable
o Increased patrol presence for crime deterrence, detection and apprehension — 89% favorable
o Crime prevention services — 89% favorable
o Youth Services programs (High School Resource Officer, DARE, GREAT, etc.) — 74%
favorable
o Crime analysis — 82% favorable
o Traffic enforcement — 65% favorable
Rate how various media are regular source of information for you about City functions, activities,
programs and events through the following channels
o Word of mouth — 36%
o Posters, banners or other signage — 32%
o Online media — 46%
o Printed media — 43%
o City website or Facebook page — 26%
He described survey responses related to community focus moving forward:
• Residents believe the following should be areas of focus over the next two years:
o Overall quality of natural environment — 83%
o Overall quality of built environment — 79%
o Health and wellness opportunities — 65%
o Sense of community — 84%
Mr. Doherty advised survey information will be placed on the City's website and a press release issued
tomorrow.
Councilmember Tibbott asked whether the location of the responses was known. Mr. Doherty referred to
a map that identified the households that received surveys; location information is not available for the
online respondents.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she took the survey and forwarded it to her friends. She relayed a concern
she heard that there were no dollar amounts associated with any of the questions. In utopia all the projects
would be great but in reality the estimates are $5+ million for Marina Beach, $8+ million for Civic Field,
etc. She asked how the survey data would be used. Mr. Doherty said the questions asked whether the
respondent supported increased funding; there was some debate among staff about whether to included
numbers but there was concern it began to sound like a referendum and the amounts are unknown. This
survey provides one piece of information for the Council when debating priorities during the budget
process. For example, if the Council is debating improving Marina Beach Park versus another park, this
may be one piece of information showing the public's support for Marina Beach.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 4
Packet Pg. 9
4.2.a
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled when the Council originally reviewed the questions there was
reference to a levy and the recommendation was to remove that. She commented people may indicate
support for a concept but will not support it when the actual cost is presented She asked how the survey
results would be integrated with the Strategic Action Plan (SAP). Mr. Doherty said following the
presentation to Council and posting information on the website, there are plans for an open house in
September to share this information with the public The SAP items could be displayed on boards in the
room while the survey information is shared to determine whether the SAP items are still important.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed, noting over time the SAP items should be whittled down to what is
reality.
Councilmember Nelson commented it was great to see that the natural environment scored the highest. He
observed only the question related to discrimination included a note from the survey: NOTE: While low
absolute figures, it is important to recognize that for some of these categories (sexual orientation,
disability, national origin, and race) the portion of the Edmonds population who fall within those cohorts
is mostly under 10016, making these response rates more significant within each cohort (e.g., 2% of the
population stating they experience discrimination based on sexual orientation, when approximately 5-
10% of the population may be a member of this cohort, meaning that 20% to 45% of that cohort may be
experiencing discrimination). Councilmember Nelson said if a certain segment of a population is being
discriminated against, that needs to be considered. Mr. Doherty commented that is the reason for the
Diversity Commission, their programs and outreach; in forums the Diversity Commission has had, some
people still feel they are experiencing discrimination.
Councilmember Nelson asked what was learned from the survey that was not known before. Mr. Doherty
answered the age discrimination was the youngest cohort and that 42% get information via print media.
Generally speaking in reviewing the questions, he expected Edmonds to score high and that happened.
Councilmember Nelson remarked he likes both forms of media.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to the way the questions were framed; many begin with the phrase,
"Would you support increased local public funding for..." He questioned whether the response rate would
have been as favorable if the question stated, "Would you be willing pay an increased local tax rate for
improved streets and sidewalks in Edmonds." Mr. Doherty recalled the Council debated that language
before approving the survey; an earlier version included more directed language related to a levy or
increased property taxes and the decision at the time was it was too directive and sounded too much like a
poll. He agreed the way the question was worded lost a little precision but the problem with specifying a
funding source is that funding source may not make the most sense in the future which increases the
complexity of the question. He was counseled by NRC to make the question more generic, recognizing it
does not provide precision but provides one point of information. Councilmember Teitzel asked whether
most respondents knew that when reading the question. Mr. Doherty answered the language was not very
complicated so he assumed they would understand it meant more funds although they would not know
whether it was a tax, a fee or a re -appropriation of existing funds.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the survey tells the City what is being done right and what
could be done better. She supported providing information to the Diversity Commission and potentially to
other commissions. She noted although respondents indicate a willingness to spend more money on
public safety, roads, and parks, voters recently did not support a $0.02 sales tax increase for public safety.
She recognized the reasons for not including a dollar amount in the survey but questioned whether the
results would be the same if an amount were included. Mr. Doherty responded the percentages in the 80s
and 90s indicate there is a lot support for some kind of funding increases. As those issues arise during this
and subsequent budget cycles, this survey can be used as a piece of information indicating support for
those subject matters. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed, noting countywide funding is different
than in funding in our own backyard. She agreed the survey results will be of value to the City. Mr.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 5
Packet Pg. 10
4.2.a
Doherty said he likely will return to Council in three years asking whether to do the survey again; those
results would illustrate how the City is doing then compared to 2016 as well as compared to other cities.
Mayor Earling said the survey results indicate the community's level of satisfaction community as well as
information regarding where improvements are needed/wanted.
3 to 0104001 B[K1]0T lu I oleo V
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said when driving along 71h Avenue tonight and looking at Civic Field, he
recognized that great open space accommodates events and sports on the same field. He encouraged the
City to maintain the space without too many impediments. Next, he said the National Citizens Survey was
a waste of time and money and should not be given much credit, commenting he would not take the time
to answer the questions. He referred to the Council's 4-3 decision to remove themselves from quasi-
judicial hearings, deciding that the Council was not smart enough to handle court -type proceeding that are
important to the public. He recalled the hard work he did on quasi-judicial matters when he was on the
Council. When Councilmembers participate in quasi-judicial hearings, they look harder at the code and
realize changes need to be made. He pointed out land use is always changing and there is not enough
public participation in land use decisions, leaving it up to staff where sometimes things get out of hand.
The Council has ability to assist citizens and ensure things are done correctly. He concluded the Council
made the wrong decision.
Dorothy Trennen, Edmonds, a member of the Edmonds Housing Task Force, a citizen group advocating
for housing for those in need, urged the Council to focus on the affordable housing that may be going in
as part of Westgate redevelopment. Mayor Earling suggested she provide comments regarding Westgate
during the public hearing.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION TO DESIGNATE WESTGATE MIXED -USE
ZONE DISTRICT AS RESIDENTIAL TARGETED AREA
Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick Doherty explained on July 26, 2016 the
Council passed a resolution of intent, a step required by State law to consider the Westgate Mixed Use
(WMU) Zone as a residential targeted area for the potential implementation of the Multifamily Tax
Exemption Program and set a public hearing for tonight. The reason the Council chose the WMU Zone
was the implementation of a plan for zoning for that mixed use center 11/2 years ago. There has been little
development activity in that area and he learned most neighboring jurisdictions have this provision.
Following the public hearing, the Council has the opportunity to designate the Westgate area as a
residential targeted area. That action does not institute the program; it simply designates Westgate as an
area where the program may be instituted. Staff will come back to Council in the next couple months with
the code provisions, ordinance, public hearing, etc. and the Council can debate the particulars of the
program at that time. The proposed action tonight is to pass the resolution to designate the WMU zone as
a residential target area.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to language in Section 1 of the resolution that states the WMU Zone
lacks sufficient affordable housing. If the resolution and subsequent processes are approved and Westgate
is redeveloped to include affordable housing, he asked what mechanism ensures those units are rented to
people who meet that demographic. Mr. Doherty referred to Section Lb that states the district lacks
sufficient available, desirable and convenient residential housing including affordable housing, noting that
section does not refer only to affordable housing. Statutory provisions at the State level provide two
incentives options, 1) 8-year tax exemption for projects that do not include affordable housing, and 2) a
50% bonus, 12-year exemption for projects if 20% of the units are affordable. He noted in any
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 6
Packet Pg. 11
4.2.a
development, some units are more affordable than others such as smaller units or units that face another
building. There is a multistep process; applicants seeking this provision apply to the City, the City
Council approves the preliminary contract; once the project is complete, the applicant returns to execute
contract. The contract states they recognize the duty to provide those housing units in accordance with a
formula for affordable for the entirety of the exemption period as well as provide an annual report to the
City regarding compliance. If the applicant does not comply, they lose the exemption.
Mayor Earling opened the public hearing.
George Keefe, Edmonds, urged the Council to adopt a development plan that provides for a 20%
affordable housing mandate with a 12-year tax incentive. The report card on child homelessness for the
2012-2013 school year ranks the State of Washington 40`h in the United States. There were 61,000
homeless children in Washington; Washington ranked lower than Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana,
Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas. The Washington statewide homeless student report by district for
the school year 2014-2015 reports the Edmonds School District had 600 homeless students, 40-60
homeless students in each of 10 grades; two-thirds were doubled up sharing housing due to loss of
housing or income hardship, more than 100 were in shelters, more than 50 were in hotels/motels and 11
were unsheltered. Such statistics about children are shameful; he commented on the difficult to do
homework in the backseat of a car or in tent city. All children deserve a home in which to study, learn and
thrive. He urged the Council to begin to address the need for affordable housing in Edmonds.
Carolyn Harris, Edmonds, a member of the Edmonds Housing Task Force, agreed with Mr. Keefe,
regarding the need for affordable housing. She explained a family is supposed to pay 30% of their income
in rent; a family she put in affordable housing recently pays 75% of their income in rent. The poverty
level in 1995 was $25,000/year; the poverty level now for a family of 4 is $24,000, yet the same housing
she put refugees in in 1995 that rented for $500/month now rents for $1500/month. There is no place for
people to live and there is a great deal of discrimination against the poor. Edmonds needs affordable
housing and needs to do something significant. She encouraged the Mayor to be the spirit of Edmonds
and for homeless children. There is a very diverse student population in Edmonds; 30 different countries
are represented in the children bused into Westgate, Chase Lake, and College Place. Thirty-nine children
who are residents of Edmonds are homeless. She noted there is little assistance for homeless children as
there is no welfare and HUD has stopped taking applications and has not increased their housing for 15
years. She urged Edmonds to take actions like Bellingham, Everett, and Seattle have done.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said Westgate is crowded now and difficult to negotiate. He recognized
Westgate could be developed to some degree including residential against the hillside but did not think
there was enough room at Westgate to make it a district for this purpose and felt it was premature to put
Westgate in a new category. He recognized there were problems with housing but did not think this
program was appropriate for this area. He questioned the financial benefit of this program to the City.
Mayor Earling closed the public hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS,
TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 1368, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, TO DESIGNATE THE WESTGATE MIXED -USE ZONE DISTRICT AS A
RESIDENTIAL TARGETED AREA FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A
MULTIFAMILY TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. ACTION ITEMS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 7
Packet Pg. 12
4.2.a
PRESENTATION AND AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT WITH HWA GEOSCIENCES FOR THE FISHING PIER
REHABILITATION PROJECT
City Engineer Rob English explained this is a supplemental agreement for additional inspection services
on the fishing pier project. The original contract, executed in March 2016, for $61,000 was followed by
the first supplemental agreement executed earlier this summer for additional testing and inspection. The
services included in this supplemental agreement total $13,891. As the concrete repairs are ongoing; this
is an estimated amount. Staff is working with the contractor on testing issues and may need to return to
Council depending on how that is resolved. He recommended approval of the supplemental agreement so
funds are available to continue inspection and testing. There were plans for a soft opening of the pier by
the end of this week; however, recent developments have moved the soft opening to September 2 due to
issues with the rail and rail supports as well as the waterline and the materials needed to correct it. There
was also a change from a clear concrete deck surface sealant to an opaque sealer.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT.
Council President Johnson inquired about the funding source. Mr. English answered it is paid from the
management reserve which is comprised of grant funds.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. AUTHORIZATION TO JOIN THE KING COUNTY LAWSUIT REGARDING RONALD
WASTEWATER DISTRICT SERVICE AREA
Public Works Director Phil Williams explained industrial land in southwest Snohomish County, Pt.
Wells, has been proposed for significant residential development, potentially 3,000 residential units.
Shoreline has been working with the property owner/developer to put the project together. The proposal
went to the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board who issued decisions related to service providers
that were contrary to King County and Shoreline's interests. Those decisions were appealed and without
any action by Snohomish County were subsequently abandoned. The parties are asking King County to
opine regarding whose stormwater service area Pt. Wells is in. Olympic View Water & Sewer District
(OVWSD), based largely in Snohomish County, feel Pt. Wells is in their service area and Edmonds
supports OVWSD's position. He requested the Council authorize the City Attorney to take the necessary
actions to have Edmonds added to the action in King County.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO INTERVENE AS A DEFENDANT IN
KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 16-2-15331-3 SEA, CAPTIONED AS
RONALD WASTEWATER DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF VS. OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER
DISTRICT ET AL., DEFENDANTS, TO PROTECT THE CITY OF EDMONDS' INTEREST IN
RECEIVING WASTEWATER FLOWS FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE POINT
WELLS AREA OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess.
3. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE
Senior Planner Kernen Lien explained:
• Pursuant to RCW 90.58.090(2)(e), the City of Edmonds has two options for responding to
Ecology's conditional approval:
1. Agree to the proposed changes, or
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 8
Packet Pg. 13
4.2.a
2. Submit an alternative proposal. Ecology will then review the alternative(s) submitted for
consistency with the purpose and intent of the changes originally submitted by Ecology with
the Shoreline Management Act.
Ecology's reply to the City's initial response — October 31 st
Mr. Lien reviewed Ecology's required changes and Council action to date:
Ecology Required Change 1Update Critical Area Ordinance reference
• Required change to reference Ord. 4026 dated May 3, 2016
• August 2nd — Council voted to accept change
Ecology Required Change 2 — Replace Appendix B
• Required change is to replace Appendix B
under Ord. 4026 (minus exceptions)
• August 2nd — Council voted to accept change
with the critical area regulations adopted in 2016
Ecology Required Change 3 - Critical Area Provisions Requiring Shoreline Variance
• Required change would eliminate SMP 24.40.020.0
• August 2nd — Council voted to accept change
Ecology Required Change 4 — Critical Area Exceptions
• Required change would modify list to only except critical area variance (ECDC 23.40.210) and
geologically hazardous areas allowed activities (ECDC 23.80.040.13)
• August 2nd — Council voted to accept change
Ecology Required Change 5 — SMP Wetland Section
• SMP 24.40.0201 contains wetland regulations for shoreline jurisdiction based on Ecology's
Guidance for Small Cities
• Required change would remove SMP 24.40.020.F
• Since the City adopted the CAO, Ecology published Guidance for Critical Area Ordinances
o Council requested information regarding the difference between Guidance for Small Cities
and Guidance for Critical Area Ordinances
■ Council packet contains a comparison done by Paul Anderson, Ecology (Exhibit 4)
• Updated critical area regulations wetland section is based on Ecology's Guidance for Small Cities
• Physically Separated/Functionally Isolated Buffer
Councilmember Teitzel referred to the statement in Exhibit 4 (packet page 486), "For water quality
improvement, the benefit of buffers is achieved within the first 60-75 feet and wider buffer are providing
primarily habitat value." In the UMU IV the buffer was set at 50 feet, less than 60-75 feet. He asked how
Mr. Anderson's recommendation regarding a 50-foot buffer width squared with his comments in Exhibit
4. Paul Anderson, Wetland Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology, responded the
statement was related to buffers that are primarily intact, well vegetated to start with, and was a general
statement about buffer function. The 50-feet proposed for the Harbor Square area would be restored
buffer via mitigation to compensate for increased land use intensity. There would be some water quality
benefit but redevelopment would also occur consistent with current stormwater standards. That statement
was not that a 60-75-foot buffer would apply; it was a general statement about the functions that buffers
provide.
Recognizing the buffer is measured from ordinary high water mark (OHWM), Councilmember Tibbott
asked if there was any estimate/guess regarding how the OHWM could change with daylighting of
Willow Creek and a more natural tidal flow into the marsh and how that would affect where the buffer is
measured from. Mr. Anderson referred to a graphic Mr. Lien displayed two meetings ago that illustrated
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 9
Packet Pg. 14
4.2.a
the estimated shift of ordinary high water as a result of daylighting Willow Creek. The graphics that have
been displayed are planning level estimates; the OHWM and the wetland edge would not be precisely
determined until a development proposal is submitted. Mr. Lien displayed a 2008 WSDOT survey of the
marsh that identified the salt tolerant vegetation that existed at that time. He identified an additional area
on the aerial image that was likely to become salt marsh if Willow Creek is daylighted and there is free
flow tidal influence into the marsh. He clarified the boundaries of marsh would not change but the
ecological makeup of a certain portion would change. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his understanding
the OHWM currently extends roughly to the base of the dike and would expand somewhat to the east with
additional flows. Mr. Lien agreed.
Councilmember Buckshnis said in Mr. Anderson's comparison, the changes are not that significant and
she questioned why not update the CAO based on the most recent BAS. Mr. Anderson answered that
could be done, it was a Council decision; they were not recommending one way or another. They were
okay with leaving the the reference to Guidance to Small Cities in the CAO especially since the new
guidance came out after the Council's recent adoption of the CAO. Councilmember Buckshnis said
although she had not done a comparison of the tables, it appeared the basis for the 10-year update was
revising buffers widths and discussing the difference between Category I and II wetlands. Mr. Anderson
commented it wasn't a 10-year update, it just happened to be that the BAS was published in 2005 and all
the documents that have come out since then have been based on the 2005 guidance. The update in June
provided clarification; some people were misinterpreting the buffer table in the Guidance for Small Cities.
He was unsure why Category II estuarine wetland were not included in the Small Cities Guidance but it is
now included. All the tables arise from Volume 2 of the BAS document; Appendix 8C is the origin of the
tables. The guidance in June was to clean up and clarify.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented if the SMP is based on 2005 the marsh is still Category I. Mr.
Anderson disagreed, that is not the not rating system, it is the BAS; the state rating system is a separate
document. Councilmember Buckshnis said if the City utilizes this data, it clearly identifies the marsh as a
Category II. Mr. Anderson answered it is based on the current rating system which is not in these
documents. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed, stating that is why the current documents should be
updated with these new rulings.
Councilmember Tibbott referred to the buffers for Category II wetlands in the 2016 Guidance. Mr.
Anderson referring to Table XX.1 (packet page 495) explaining these were separated out due to the belief
that estuarine and interdunal wetland had special enough characteristics that the buffer widths should not
be based solely on wetland ratings score. The current wetland rating system only goes into detail for
freshwater wetlands. Estuarine wetlands are identified separately because there is not a system for rating
them, the habitat functions are not as well understood and interdunal wetlands are a unique system. For
the salt marsh portion of Edmonds Marsh, only the estuarine buffer widths would be used and the habitat
score would not be considered in establishing the buffer.
Councilmember Tibbott concluded from the table that BAS suggests there should be a 110 buffer in that
area. Mr. Anderson said Table XX.1 would be 150 feet; Table XX.3 would be 110 feet on a Category II
wetland. The minimization measures in XX.2 need to be included or a wildlife corridor established that is
100 feet wide. If either can be done, it qualifies for the reduced buffer width of 110 feet. If a wildlife
corridor cannot be established or the minimization measures included, the buffer is 150 feet in Table
XX.3. Mr. Lien added this assumes a vegetated buffer exists and there is not already existing
development. If development occurred in an area where there was an existing buffer, this guidance would
apply in that area. Mr. Anderson agreed, pointing out the 50-foot buffer with setback in the required
changes is a restored buffer which is not what these tables are referencing. These tables apply to a well
vegetated or any remaining portion of a well vegetated buffer.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 10
Packet Pg. 15
4.2.a
Councilmember Tibbott concluded from the explanation that these tables have nothing to do with the
Edmonds Marsh. Mr. Anderson they have nothing to do with the marsh along the west, north and east
side; there is still some intact buffer on the south side and there may be 150 feet of forest in the southeast
corner. When the buffer along Harbor Square was measured, the only effective buffer that exists is 13 feet
to the top of the berm. Mr. Lien displayed an aerial view of the impacted buffer, explaining Ecology
Required Change 5 is related to the wetland section of the SMP and making it consistency with the CAO.
While related, is a separate issue from Ecology Required Change 7 which is related to the appropriate
setback and buffer for the area next to the marsh. The SMP establishes specific setbacks and buffer for the
marsh based on site specific characteristics; this is more general guidance.
Councilmember Nelson said given that this would apply to a portion of the Edmonds Marsh, the June
2016 Guidance should apply to the CAO.
COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS. TO
USE THE JUNE 2016 GUIDANCE FOR CAO UPDATES FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON TO
UPDATE THE CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE.
Development Services Director Shane Hope said a new CAO cannot be adopted on the spot; this is
direction to use this as guidance in future discussions. Mr. Lien said the Ecology required change is
whether the wetland section in the SMP are consistent with the CAO. If the Council accepts this change,
it utilizes the current CAO. If the Council wants to use the 2016 update in the SMP, that alternative would
need to be proposed to Ecology. If that is the Council's direction, he will need to review the wetland
section to determine what should be removed such as the physical separated/functionally isolated
provision. It may be that the table is retained because the rest is consistent with the CAO. Councilmember
Nelson said if staff needs more time, that is his intent. Mr. Lien suggested the Council vote on that and he
will take a closer look and bring it back to Council.
Council President Johnson asked staff to explain what this would mean to the adopted CAO and the
process that would be followed to make changes to the adopted CAO. Ms. Hope said her understanding is
the Council is providing an alternative to Ecology's required change on the wetland section and
referencing the newer guidance. While it could create a need to revise the CAO, that would not happen
now but as part of a future process and Mr. Lien could return with the details at a future meeting. She
suggested the Council indicate their preference related to the SMP response.
Councilmember Teitzel pointed out the CAO was considered and adopted before the June 16, 2016
report. There will be timing issues in the future as new science continually emerges and he did not want
the Council reopening the CAO and SMP to integrate new information. This may be a unique
circumstance as the report impacts both the CAO and SMP. Mr. Lien pointed out there are periodic
updates of the CAO and SMP and agreed this was a unique situation. Ms. Hope said cities typically do
not amend the CAO within 1-2 years of adoption. However, that decision is still ahead regardless of
tonight's decision.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether physically separated/functionally isolated was changed to
interrupted buffer in the CAO. Mr. Lien explained in the section of the SMP that Ecology recommends be
removed, 24.40.020.17, there is a physically separated/functionally isolated buffer. If the Council wants to
include the 2016 guidance from Ecology in the SMP, he would need to review 24.40.020.F to see what
needs to be retained to include the 2016 update; it was likely only the buffer table needed to included.
Councilmember Buckshnis said Mr. Anderson's summary indicates it cleans things up and provides better
guidance; therefore, she feels it may be advantageous to do this as an alternative. Mr. Lien said one of the
reasons for the CAO integration was to have the same regulation apply within shoreline jurisdiction that
apply outside shoreline jurisdiction. Different guidance in the SMP defeats that purpose. Updating the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 11
Packet Pg. 16
4.2.a
CAO would be a separate action and follow a different timeline. Ms. Hope pointed out it would require a
full public process and may take a few months.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked how it would affect the October 31, 2016 deadline. Ms. Hope said staff
will research what could be done that would have the least disruption. Councilmember Buckshnis
preferred to get done before October 3, 2016. David Pater, Regional Shoreline Planner, Washington
State Department of Ecology, clarified it would not delay the SMP process, it cleans up Ecology's
Required Change 5 and the changes would be reflected in the table. There would be some deviation until
the CAO is updated.
Mr. Lien clarified the motion as follows:
WITH REGARD TO ECOLOGY REQUIRED CHANGE 5, USE 2016 ECOLOGY GUIDANCE ON
WETLANDS IN THE SMP.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Lien said he will return at future meeting with information regarding how it is integrated.
Ecology Required Change 6 — UMU IV Interim Desi ig a� tion
• UMU IV shoreline environment established as an interim designation
• Required change would eliminate the interim designation
• Changing interim designation would require an SMP amendment
• If Council proposes to keep interim designation, a clear purpose and specific timeline should be
developed with stakeholders
Councilmember Buckshnis said if Ecology has already not agreed to an interim, there is no reason to use
an interim. Even though she believed all the logic and past discussions on the interim, she did not support
this because she did not want to waste time.
Council President Johnson said she was tasked with reaching out to stakeholders to determine whether
they were interested in participation in an interim designation. She reported the Port was not interested in
an interim designation so there was not agreement amongst the stakeholders. Without the Port's interest in
an interim designation, it does not make sense for the City to pursue it.
COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO
REMOVE THE INTERIM DESIGNATION OF UMU IV FOR THE PURPOSES OF
ESTABLISHING A BUFFER FOR THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM. UPON ROLL
CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS MESAROS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO.
Ecology required Change 7 — UMU IV Setback/Buffer
• Council approved SMP established a 100-foot setback with the requirement to establish a 50-foot
vegetative buffer within the setback with redevelopment in the UMU IV environment
• Required change would establish a 65-foot setback with the requirement to establish a 50-foot
vegetative buffer within the setback with redevelopment in the UMU IV environment
• Larger setback/buffer vs. Smaller setback/buffer
o Large setback/buffer may perpetuate status quo
o Smaller setback/buffer may provide incentive for redevelopment and buffer restoration
Mr. Lien displayed an aerial image of the original UMU III, explaining when it was first determined that
the Edmonds Marsh was a shoreline of the state instead of an associated wetland and the shoreline
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 12
Packet Pg. 17
jurisdiction was extended, a new environment for the Harbor Square and the property on the south side of
the marsh (Chevron property) was established. When originally established, it was an Urban Mixed Use
III environment which also included residential development. The initial proposal developed by staff
included only a 25-foot setback which was based on the contract rezone for the Harbor Square property
which has as 25-foot open space area adjacent to the marsh. At the Planning Board, the SMP was slowed
to coincide with the Port of Edmonds Harbor Square Master Plan process so they could be discussed
concurrently. The Planning Board recommended a 50-foot setback as measured from OHWM; implicit in
that 50-foot setback, although not described in detail in the SMP, was with redevelopment of Harbor
Square there would be enhancement of the buffer around the marsh although the amount to be revegetated
was not specified.
Mr. Lien continued, the Council discussed options related to the buffer and setback, including a 150-foot
setback as measured from the edge of the marsh with a 50-foot vegetated buffer. This option arose from
some confusion of the buffer setback issue and where it was measured from. A lot of Council discussions
regarding buffers and setbacks revolved around Appendix L of a grant guidance document on three
specific water quality grants. The Council wanted a 50-foot vegetated buffer and it as thought at the time
that according to Appendix L a 100-foot buffer applied which was added to the 50-foot buffer for a total
of 150 feet. During discussions about where buffer and setback are measured from, the Council ultimately
adopted the 100-foot setback as measured from the OHWM and within the 100-foot setback a
requirement to establish a 50-foot vegetated buffer with redevelopment of Harbor Square.
Mr. Lien explained Ecology's required change is a 65-foot setback from the edge of the marsh with a 50-
foot vegetated buffer within it. His understanding of Ecology's buffer and setback requirements consider
existing conditions. Buffers provide two functions, water quality and habitat. The habitat value landward
of the marsh is diminished. Water quality could be provided with a vegetated buffer and water quality can
be met with a small buffer than habitat. Ecology recommended 65 feet because the CAO requires a 15-
foot building setback in addition to the buffer. One of the main criteria of the SMP is meeting the no net
loss requirement. He read from the SMP handbook regarding buffers and setback, "Some local
governments with intensely developed shorelines have established only setbacks from the OHWM.
Vegetation conservation is required and planting new vegetation and replacing noxious weeks and
invasive plants with native plants and other habitat improvements are required for new or expanded
development." That was implicit in the Planning Board's recommendations and somewhat more explicit
in the Council's adopted 100-foot setback and 50-foot vegetated buffer as well as in Ecology's required
change. hi response to questions regarding why this is different than BAS, he explained the primary
reason is looking at existing conditions on the ground. As there basically is no buffer or severely impacted
buffer particularly on the Harbor Square side, consideration is given to what can be done to improve
exiting conditions. He suggested a smaller setback buffer may provide incentive for improvements; a
larger buffer is just a line on ground when no buffer exists.
Councilmember Teitzel said buffers, setbacks, shoreline setbacks and structure buffers are confusing and
complicated and only apply to to UMU IV. He referred to a statement in Ecology's findings and
conclusions (Attachment A, packet page 262), "SMP-required change number three requires a 50-foot
buffer with a minimum 15-foot structural buffer setback." Councilmember Teitzel agreed with that logic,
finding it consistent with the CAO. In order to simplify, he suggested using Ecology's language
throughout the SMP related to a buffer and a structural setback. He recognized that would require
changing the shoreline bulk and dimensional standards but could be done by removing the quantification
footnote and stating in the UMU IV there is a 50-foot buffer and 15-foot structural setback.
Councilmember Tibbott agreed with Councilmember Teitzel's suggestion for consistency in the way
buffers and setbacks are described. He observed there is currently a 25-foot setback or buffer. Mr. Lien
said the 1980s contract rezone for Harbor Square established General Commercial zoning with certain
restrictions. The contract rezone established a 25-feet open space zone from the edge of the marsh to
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 13
Packet Pg. 18
provide an ecological separation for the marsh; it is not specifically identified in the contract rezone as a
buffer or setback. Councilmember Tibbott asked the difference between an open space and a vegetated
buffer. Mr. Lien answered open space is a zoning term. There is a chapter in the ECDC regarding open
space and allowed uses. A vegetated buffer is intended to provide some ecological benefit to an adjacent
critical area, stream, wetland, etc. Two primary functions of a buffer are water quality and habitat.
Generally wider buffers are driven by habitat need; water quality standards can be met with smaller
buffers.
If the Council adopted a 50-foot vegetated buffer, Councilmember Tibbott assumed the area north and
south of the marsh would look significant different than it does today with just open space. Mr. Lien
answered not immediately. The 50-foot vegetated buffer is established with redevelopment within the
shoreline jurisdiction. Currently the 50-foot area is not vegetated all the way around the marsh; that buffer
would be established as mitigation for development. With regard to a 15-foot setback landward of the 50-
foot buffer, Councilmember Tibbott asked if impervious surfaces would be allowed in that building
setback. Mr. Lien referred to page 54 of the SMP, Shoreline Bulk and Dimensional Standards; the left
side of column has the different uses that could occur within shoreline jurisdiction; across the top are the
shoreline environments. He referred to shore setback for commercial development in UMU IV, 150150.
Footnote 18 states setback from new development with UMU IV is 100 feet; new development activities
within the UMU IV environment require the establishment of a 50-foot vegetated buffer. The 100150
applies to other uses, not just structures; even parking within the UMU IV would be required to be
setback 100 feet from the edge of the marsh. Ecology's required change would change 100150 in the table
to 65/50. He clarified it is not just a structural setback; it is a use setback.
Councilmember Tibbott asked if there are other significant uses other than buildings and parking. Mr.
Lien said recreation has a 15-foot setback. Councilmember Tibbott inquired about a pervious walking
trail. Mr. Lien said trails are addressed in the SMP; access to the shoreline is a critical component of the
Shoreline Management Act (SMA). There are specific regulations regarding trails in the shoreline area.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled a long discussion she and Mr. Lien had with a citizen regarding
comments 17-23 about the buffer and setback starting at the same point of origin which is contrary to
what was done previously. She asked Mr. Lien to explain how the 100-foot buffer/setback language
occurred and how the 100-foot setback and 50-foot buffer was determined. Mr. Lien referred to Comment
1 and his response (packet page 271) regarding the buffer/setback combination, "Chapter 11 of the SMP
Handbook notes, "Shoreline setbacks are the distances separating two features such as a structure and the
water, or a structure and the buffer." The SMP handbook also notes, "Some local governments with
intensely developed shorelines have established only setbacks from the OHWM. Vegetation conservation
is required." With the SMP, buffer is defined as the area adjacent to a critical area and/or shoreline that is
required for the continued maintenance, function, and/or structural stability of the critical area and/or
shoreline. Buffer widths vary depending on the relative quality and sensitivity of the area being protected.
Unlike zoning or shore setbacks, buffer areas are intended to be left undisturbed, or may need to be
enhanced to support natural processes, functions and values. Shore setback is also defined in the SMP, the
minimum distance between a structure or use and the shoreline ordinary high water mark."
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the citizen saying he hoped Ecology required Edmonds to clear up
this confusion and determine if the 50-foot buffer and 100-foot setback from any new development is
appropriate for the UMU IV.
Councilmember Nelson recalled Ecology's PowerPoint presentation regarding buffers stated the State
Supreme Court ruled that under GMA there is no requirement to restore degraded buffers and that that
same principle applied to the Edmonds Marsh and Harbor Square. The case, Snohomish Indian Tribal
Community versus Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board was related to the GMA
and competing river and agricultural farming land. Mr. Anderson agreed it was the Skagit River and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 14
Packet Pg. 19
4.2.a
reestablishing buffers on agricultural land to support salmon. Councilmember Nelson pointed out the
SMA was never mentioned in that case. Mr. Anderson agreed. Councilmember Nelson asked whether the
requirement not to restore degraded buffers been brought to the State Supreme Court. Mr. Anderson
answered he was not aware it had but it has been reviewed as a land use issue, not taking property without
due process. Mr. Pater added this is addressed in the State Shoreline Master Program Guidelines in the
WAC. In Edmonds the status of the ecology function was established in 2007 with the shoreline inventory
and characterization. In the case of the marsh, the inventory and characterization assumed the shoreline
jurisdiction at that time went to the edge of the wetland until Mr. Anderson's research in 2010 that
determined the jurisdiction extended further. That set the baseline for no net loss of ecological functions.
Anything above that is considered restoration unless redevelopment of Harbor Square and Unocal sites
increases the intensity of uses and warrants mitigation. Legally the State cannot force a jurisdiction to
restore an area; it is purely voluntary. Councilmember Nelson observed if the baseline was established in
2007 and then further research was done in 2010, who knows what happened in those 3 years. Mr. Pater
agreed it was always a moving target which was one of problems with prolonged local processes. He
agreed things have changed since 2007.
Councilmember Nelson said the requirement for no restoration is under WAC 173-26-241 standards
which states, "Master programs shall establish a comprehensive program of use regulations for shorelines
and shall incorporate provisions for specific uses consistent with the following as necessary to assure
consistency with the policy of the act and where relevant within the jurisdiction." That WAC, under
Commercial development states, "Master programs shall first give preference to water -dependent
commercial uses over nonwater-dependent commercial uses; and second, give preference to water -related
and water -enjoyment commercial uses over nonwater-oriented commercial uses" as well as "Master
programs should require that public access and ecological restoration be considered as potential
mitigation of impacts to shoreline resources and values for all water -related..." and "Master programs
shall prohibit nonwater-oriented commercial uses on the shoreline unless they meet the following criteria:
he use is part of a mixed -use project that includes water -dependent uses and provides a significant public
benefit with respect to the Shoreline Management Act's objectives such as providing public access and
ecological restoration." Councilmember Nelson asked how this applies to UMU IV. Mr. Pater pointed out
Harbor Square is not a water -dependent use. Mr. Lien said the Edmonds Marsh is different type of
shoreline environment than Puget Sound. Puget Sound has navigable waters and is appropriate for water -
dependent uses; the Edmonds Marsh is not an environment where there will be water dependent uses. The
SMA focuses on navigable waterways. Councilmember Nelson said restoration cannot be required yet the
WAC states nonconforming uses can require restoration. Mr. Pater answered that is restoration through
mitigation. Mitigation is a requirement when increasing the intensity of development. The SMA is a
balancing act between public access and protecting shoreline resources and allowing water -dependent
uses.
Councilmember Nelson appreciated the balancing act and wanted to ensure there was a balance. He felt
there was an imbalance and he wanted to restore the balance. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said there has
been some confusion about restoration mitigation because of the way Ecology distinguishes between the
two. The buffers the Council is discussing will only apply when redevelopment occurs. He disagreed with
Ecology's conclusion that the Council was limited by what currently exists because the buffers the
Council will be establishing are only relevant in the context of redevelopment, not what currently exists.
COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
ADOPT THE 65-FOOT SETBACK/BUFFER AS RECOMMENDED BY ECOLOGY.
Councilmember Mesaros appreciated Mr. Taraday's clarification. He acknowledged everyone would like
to have a 100-foot buffer to protect the marsh; however, that does not exist. The Council could approve
that and many in the City would be happy but it would only be an approval on paper due to the amount of
development that exists in that area. He expressed support for the motion, finding the 50 foot plus 15 feet
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 15
Packet Pg. 20
4.2.a
appropriate and that buffer will be established as redevelopment occurs. He was hopeful with this
setback/buffer the Port would do something.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas did not support the motion. She was uncertain the Council was ready to
determine the best buffer, whether it is a 50-foot buffer and a 15-foot setback, she was not clear that was
enough. She has her own opinion about the buffer but that is irrelevant to this motion.
Councilmember Nelson also opposed the motion, commenting not one size fit all. There are parts of the
marsh buffer that are vegetated and parts that are not; to establish a blanket setback/buffer for the entire
marsh did not make sense using BAS. For example, in the Willow Creek area where there is the intent to
bring back juvenile salmon, taking away the existing buffer does not make sense. Mr. Lien clarified
Councilmember Nelson's comment, explaining this buffer would only apply within shoreline jurisdiction.
The southwest corner of the marsh where a buffer exists is outside outside shoreline jurisdiction and
whatever buffer is established in the CAO or the wetland section of the SMP would apply in that area.
The 65-foot setback/50-foot buffer would not apply because it is outside the shoreline jurisdiction.
Councilmember Nelson said he still has an issue with the Harbor Square area that is much more
salvageable and one size does not fit all. He said that setback/buffer was a minimum and the City can do
better.
Councilmember Teitzel expressed support for the motion. He explained the Council could potentially
approve a 100 buffer/setback but that means Harbor Square would remain as it currently exists, dooming
the marsh to the existing 12-13 foot open space and providing less opportunity for recovery over time. He
wanted to see the marsh recover and the best way to do that was to give deference to Ecology's expertise.
He agreed it was a balancing act and this was a compromise to improve the quality of the marsh.
Councilmember Buckshnis did not support the motion. She recommended Ecology adhere to its own
literature and guidance. The 50-feet was supposedly an agreed -upon amount with some stakeholders that
the City was not a part of. She recalled a meeting with Mr. Stockdale at Ecology who talked about
mitigation and how the area could be redone as part of redevelopment.
With regard to marsh recovery, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled reading that having buildings
and people closer to the marsh does not help the marsh's recovery. Mr. Pater said that is not in the
findings and conclusions. Mr. Lien referred to the last bullet on the PowerPoint related to Ecology
Required Change 7, the buffer around the marsh is disturbed, establishing a large setback and buffer may
perpetuate the status quo because there is no incentive for redevelopment. A smaller setback and buffer
may provide incentive for redevelopment and establish a buffer, improving existing conditions. He
concluded a larger buffer would be nice but he questioned whether that was reality or just a line on the
ground.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how development improved the marsh. Mr. Lien answered the
buffer is not established unless redevelopment occurs. A large setback discourages redevelopment so the
buffer s not established. Development and restoration are not a no sum gain; environmental and economic
benefits can be realized with development. Mr. Taraday said the last bullet in the PowerPoint assumes
that all other things are equal. There are other tools the Council can use to incentivize redevelopment;
buffer width is a major factor but it is not the only way. He agreed in the absence of redevelopment there
would not be a vegetated buffer; either redevelopment or a lot of money would be required to create a
vegetated buffer. Upon the occurrence of a certain amount of redevelopment, property owners would be
required to create a vegetated buffer; the Council is deliberating on how much of a vegetative buffer
would be required.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 16
Packet Pg. 21
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked who determines the benefit of development via an incentive. Mr.
Taraday answered the Council controls what it values as a beneficial development or mitigation via
establishing shoreline environments, corresponding zoning, uses, building heights and other factors to
incentivize development. Mr. Lien clarified the difference between what the Council adopted and what
Ecology is proposing; both require establishing a 50-foot vegetated buffer, the difference is the setback.
Where the Council had a 100-foot setback, Ecology is proposing a 65-foot setback, a difference of 35 feet
in the setback area.
Councilmember Tibbott spoke in favor of the motion. Redevelopment has the potential of establishing a
vegetated buffer as well as compliance with new stormwater regulations which would be a significant
improvement to the water quality that currently drains directly into marsh. Second, it would meet the no
net loss requirement particularly on the southeast side of the marsh where the larger buffer that currently
exists could be improved. The Council is currently discussing the setback for the SMP but in the future
will be considering zoning for Harbor Square or the south side of marsh which can fine-tune in ways that
cannot be done in the SMP. He was supportive of this setbackibuffer as a starting point.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. MOTION TO CALL FOR
THE QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION FAILED (3-4) COUNCILMEMBERS MESAROS,
TEITZEL, AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO.
Council President Johnson suggested the Council continue its discussion regarding the SMP after the
following presentation.
1. OFFICE OF NEIGHBORHOODS PRESENTATION ON HOMELESS OUTREACH BY
SGT. IAN HURI OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Sgt. Ian Huri, Snohomish County Sheriffs Department, explained a few years ago Snohomish County
realized, specifically in the jail, there was a large problem with opioid abuse and the impacts and cost it
had on the community. The jail and human services at the County level partnered and determined the
needs were with the frequent jail utilizers as well as those in need in the community. The needs of
frequent jail utilizers do not necessarily match the needs of low income families in the community as a
whole. What a family in need requires from human services and can easily acquire by following the
proper channels is not the same for an opioid addict or someone with metal health problems. The issue
was how first responders effectively respond to crises they are called to.
The jail began a program, Jail Transitional Services, that looked at how to end the cycle of homelessness,
drug abuse and provide proper mental health treatment and other post -incarceration options. The business
model is broken; the cycle is patrol is called to a nuisance complaint, trespasser, shoplifter, etc., they are
arrested for the crime, usually a misdemeanor level offense, booked into Snohomish County Jail, solving
the problem for about eight hours. As soon as the person is released, they still do not have housing, they
are still addicted and will steal, etc. to get better. When he first started in law enforcement 13 years ago,
methamphetamine was a big problem in Snohomish County. Although meth addicts do crazy things under
the influence, the long term impacts on their health and the community's health are very different than
what is seen now. With opioid addicts, their daily goal is to get enough of the drug to not feel sick (the
worst flu multiplied by ten). He described a couple of people he interviewed today, both were using over
a gram of heroin/day just to keep from getting sick. One is working full-time under the table and is just
getting by, has no place to live, and all the money he earns goes to heroin.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 17
Packet Pg. 22
4.2.a
The Sheriff's Office started a unit called the Office of Neighborhoods that began by looking at other
agencies and in-house jail studies to determine how to better serve these groups. They visited Santa
Monica Police Department to learn about their community's efforts to address homelessness and tried to
implement some of their programs. One giant takeaway from Santa Monica was not only did they have a
very effective homeless community program that works on the municipal level, human services could be
integrated with law enforcement more effectively. In the previously described cycle, people have the co-
occurring problems like chemical dependency, homelessness, mental illness, were not connecting with
services that were available to them. The Office of Neighborhoods includes a social worker to help law
enforcement navigate those services with clients. They quickly realized simply giving someone direction
wasn't effective; they were not showing up because so many have lost life skills and they are unable to
proceed when encountering minor roadblocks. They realized more handholding would be required such as
social workers who drive people to their appointments; very labor intensive but people began realizing
they could follow through.
Drug treatment is used with most clients as a way to get housing. Housing in Everett has a less than 2%
vacancy rate; landlords are more likely to rent to someone with a stable income than someone working
through drug treatment and has no income. With drug treatment, they qualify for a county grant problem
that provides three months of free housing; their full-time job during that three months is intensive
outpatient. The Office of Neighborhoods began to piece together the assets in Snohomish County and
throughout the State. He noted if the existing16 detox beds in Snohomish County were doubled or tripled,
they could be quickly filled. Opioid addicts go through five days of detox before inpatient. Clients are
sent to Spokane, Palm Springs and elsewhere to get help. The goal is not to make them another city's
problem; they want them back in Snohomish County where they grew up and where they went to local
schools and they want them healthy. When clients return to Snohomish County, they go straight into the
three months of free housing and three months of subsidized housing; during the second three months
they complete outpatient and 90 meetings in 90 days and start looking for jobs, go back to school, and
find other programs while self -managing their issues and begin tapering off the hand holding.
Last year's Point in Time count found an increase in unsheltered and homeless individuals. Although
below record numbers, it found a higher percentage of the homeless that are opioid addicts. The Office of
Neighborhoods' approach is working; approximately 60 people began detox, 55 completed detox and
went to an in -patient facility, 35 graduated and 9 are still in treatment which is much better compared to
10% national average success rate. Their program has only been in operation since August 2015 and at
full-strength with him, two deputies and two social workers since March 2016. Social liberals love this
idea because it is the right thing to do to help people instead of continually incarcerating people. Fiscal
conservatives want to know the savings. He provided an example, Edmonds books an opioid addict into
the Snohomish County jail who then hurts themselves enough to be taken to the hospital. Two custody
deputies accompany the person to the hospital and remain with them, probably on overtime. The person is
probably prescribed medication that is dispensed by medical personnel at the jail. The program he
described was about 1/4 of that cost. The 211 program, run by Volunteers of America, manages flex funds
for law enforcement and is available to any jurisdiction. Officers only need to call and ask for emergency
flex funds for a person such as emergency housing for the night. He recommended the City looking for
ideas and use Santa Monica as an example. The goal is law enforcement, judges, prosecutors, defense,
and human services working together to help transition people from chronic homelessness into housing.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said in working with Robin Fenton and the Law and Justice
Commission, it was important for people to understand this is low barrier housing which does not prevent
people from housing due to alcohol or drug addiction. She commented one of the hardest parts of getting
a job and moving forward beyond treatment is not having a place to shower, wash clothes or an address.
Snohomish County has the highest opioid heroin abuse in the nation. Having these services provided by
the Sheriff's Office with Everett has done a lot for Everett. She thanked them for what they are doing.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 18
Packet Pg. 23
4.2.a
Councilmember Buckshnis also commended the Office of Neighborhoods for their program. She asked
how many clients were veterans. Sgt. Huri answered the population they have helped in Snohomish
County has included four veterans who were connected with Veteran Services of Snohomish County.
There are other frequent jail utilizers that have served in the military but for some reason do not claim
veteran's status. Of the four, two were referred to VA Seattle for drug treatment and housing and the
others were helped locally via VA Services of Snohomish County. He said Veterans Services has begun
serving veterans effectively and the end result is seen on the street in that homeless veterans and under -
housed veterans are not seen as frequently as they were 2-3 years ago.
For Councilmember Buckshnis, Sgt. Huri explained some of the material he provided was research done
by Robin Fenton and Snohomish County Human Services prior to the implementation of the Office of
Neighborhoods, their reference point regarding what they have and what they need. They have a lot of
opioid, mental health and homeless issues in the jail and frequent utilizers; what they need is drug
treatment, low barrier housing where relapses are not the end of the world. He believes in the housing first
model and has seen it work. Of the three clients who have relapsed, two are still housed and the third has
been homeless for a week and is getting back into the program. Relapses are shorter and the chance of
reoffending can be better managed via housing.
Observing the model he described is based in Snohomish County, Council President Johnson asked what
1-2 things Edmonds could do as a city of 40,000 to make a difference. Sgt. Huri recommended getting all
the stakeholders together to discuss how to solve the problem as a community. Law enforcement, human
services, or fire cannot solve the problem by themselves. He recommended getting human service, police,
fire, prosecutor, public defense attorney and possibly a judge together to look at frequent utilizers that hit
the legal system or emergency department repeatedly, and determine how to intervene as a group. A
connection between law enforcement and human services is vital.
Councilmember Nelson commented the region has auto theft and gang task forces, this is obviously a
regional problem and the homeless likely go to Mukilteo, Edmonds and Everett. He suggested all
Snohomish County cities chip in officers and funding for a regional solution. Sgt. Huri said he was a fan
of that approach; they have discussed that with some cities, providing assistance even one day a week. He
agreed with a regional approach where budgets allow.
3. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE - Continued
Council President Johnson said this is area where the City Council could benefit from some expert advice.
The Council does not have all the answers tonight which is the reason some Councilmembers were
reluctant to accept Ecology's proposal.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO NOT ACCEPT ECOLOGY'S RECOMMENDATION ON THIS SUBJECT AND
COME BACK WITH AN ALTERNATIVE TO ECOLOGY.
Council President Johnson reiterated neither she nor other Councilmembers have all the information. She
wanted to make a decision based on science and in order for the City Council to move forward, she felt
more work needed to be done. Mayor Earling asked the nature of the work.
Councilmember Mesaros questioned whether a motion was needed. Rather than passing a motion saying
more research was needed, he preferred to do the research. He suggested simply requesting more
information, reviewing the information and making a decision.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 19
Packet Pg. 24
4.2.a
Councilmember Teitzel agreed with Councilmember Mesaros, commenting the Council has received a
great deal of information and can always ask for more. Councilmembers have studied the issue for many
hour as well as talked to experts and stakeholders. He was frustrated and sad because although he dearly
wanted to see the marsh recover and be a host to salmon and be a refuge for birds, he was concerned if the
Council continued to debate the issue of setback and buffers and Council decided there should be larger
buffer such as 100 feet or 150 feet, it was a hollow victory because it was on paper only and the existing
conditions would continue which would not benefit the marsh or the environment. He preferred the
Council have positive motion on the issue so the marsh can begin to recover.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said if movement was desired, she was ready to propose a width tonight.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO CALL FOR A 75-FOOT BUFFER BASED ON THE
WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND A 15-FOOT SETBACK.
Mayor Earling ruled the amendment was unrelated to the motion.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF
THE SECONDER.
Council President Johnson commented the City has a history of many different setbacks, proposals and
scientific tables. She needs independent advice to help her understand what is the most defensible position
for the City. Once the information is provided, the Council can make a recommendation. Without
sufficient evaluation of all the different requirements as well as what that means for Edmonds, this is the
best step to take rather than make a decision based on a table, recommendation or position. She wanted a
defensible, rational, scientifically based decision that the City can live with. Mr. Pater said that is the
same thing Ecology struggled with when recommending the 50-foot buffer and 15-foot setback. The SMP
was adopted in 2014 and public comment was taken in the spring. Ecology listened to everyone involved
including the Port, Chevron, Unocal, WSDOT, Councilmembers and staff in an effort to move the process
forward. Although he understood Council President Johnson's desire for more information, that
information may not be available until the site is redeveloped. It is a complicated site and the City is
charting new territory because it is a compromised system, Harbor Square is part of the wetland, there is a
dike, etc.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if Council President Johnson was suggesting an outside source
help determine the best step. Council President Johnson agreed that was her thinking.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS MESAROS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:15 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
It was agreed the Council would continue discussing the SMP at a future meeting.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling offered congratulations to the community and the Chamber for a successful Taste of
Edmonds, with particular thanks to the Chamber for lowering the music volume. He has heard from
several citizens that the volume was much better than in recent years.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 20
Packet Pg. 25
Mayor Earling relayed he introduced the concert in the park last week, attended by approximately 400
people. He encouraged citizens to attend the concerts in the park as well as the concerts at Hazel Miller
Plaza.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested Councilmembers who attend conferences on behalf of the
City provide a report to Council regarding what they learned.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked the citizens who called and emailed her regarding the quasi-judicial
process. The reason she amended the motion to not have the issue scheduled on the Consent Agenda and
instead take a vote at that meeting was because placing it on the Consent Agenda would simply result in it
being pulled and having the same argument and the same vote. She encouraged citizens to contact
Councilmembers and/or talk to the media.
Council President Johnson thanked everyone who attend the Taste and helped with the Waste
Management stations. The stations are a commitment by the City to have zero waste and a wonderful
opportunity to educate the public regarding how to recycle everything in the waste stream. She
appreciated the attendance at the Old Settlers Picnic, commenting this was the first time she attended and
she was glad she did. She expressed thanks to Chris who has taken over this project for the City.
Councilmember Teitzel reported in working with the postmaster and the postmaster getting input from
citizens regarding the value of a downtown drive -up mailbox at 2nd and Main, the postmaster has agreed
to have a box installed in the downtown core area. He, Mr. Williams and the postmaster have been
looking for a location and have narrowed it to 2-3 locations. Unfortunately, the postal maintenance crew
removed the existing drive -up mailbox today without the postmaster's knowledge. They will attempt to
have the process of installing a new mailbox accelerated.
Councilmember Mesaros reported the Pacific Little League lost to Bend, Oregon earlier this week, ending
their attempt at the Little League World Series. He encouraged the public to wish the players well and
was glad they had an opportunity to play in the regional playoffs.
11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
This item was not needed.
12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
This item was not needed.
13. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:09 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 16, 2016
Page 21
Packet Pg. 26
4.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Anne Johnson ($500,000.00), and Frontier (amount
undetermined).
Staff Lead: {Type Name of Staff Lead}
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Linda Hynd
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages by minute entry.
Narrative
Anne Johnson
($500,000.00)
Frontier
Claims Department
P.O. Box 60770
Oklahoma City, OK 73146-4066
(amount undetermined)
Attachments:
Johnson Claim for Damages_Redacted
Frontier Claim 8-10-2016
Packet Pg. 27
+'CF'V9 �� CITY OF EllMONDS
�U� 1 J M6 P, CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM
Date Claim Form
' CITYCUW Received by City
%1 , who currently resides a
mailing address C--
home hone ork phone # f25. iaJ.04V who resided a�
at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is '/E�1 1 is claiming damages
against 1?Ti in the sum of $.5C'V Cr:)0 arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
DATE OF OCCURRENCE: ! � TIME:
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE:
DESCRIPTION: V i O V p.-+To r)s tF 'KCW (0 0, 1$O (yY ,d ' U 0 '
1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe tlje injury or damage.
1-n ve. lov n r� N t Q C r)n �5 n (-A 1. �7 `f�1 tv r'aCarn A O Gy') L tLL yl 10/1 Q
1 (attach'an extra sheet for additional information, if Vded)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and pha a numbers.
n iCLr,I L
f
3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes -X— No
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy #:
License Plate # _
Type Auto:
(year)
DRIVER:
Address:
Phone#:
Passengers:
Name:
Address:
* * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY
Driver License #
(make) (model)
_ OWNER:
Address:
Phone#:
Name:
Address:
m
E
L
0
E
U
N
r
Form Revised 05/06/14 Page 1 of 2
Packet Pg. 28
4.3.a
* * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * *
I, - ape, 4 . plf+t' smn , being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above
described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledge that any
information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.
X dd�� � -
LL
Signature of Claimant(s)
State of Washington
County of _ K 10-J
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A-0ht; S • -�*"S,1--is the person who appeared before me, and said
person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
qmp-
Dated: f �Zf
t � - .■DO 1#
do
goTgq�,
Sig e� ` N i � `..
•
Title J ' C�`
My appointment expires: "'l %ny �j� "q
����■ WAVOZo `
Please present the completed claim form to:
City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 51h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
m
ts�
L
�°
E
U
tV
to
Fenn Revised 05/06/14
Page 2 of 2
Packet Pg. 29
ft,an-her
Welcome to the New Frontier
*****NOTICE OF CLAIM*****
Date: 08-10-2016
CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
To: CITY OF EDMONDS
CITY CLERK
CITY HALL
121 5TH AVENUE N
EDMONDS, WA 98020
4.3.b
CMR CLAIMS DEPARTME
P.O. BOX 60770
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73146-0770
1-866-887-4066
CERTIFIED MAIL# 9171 9690 0935 0095 9749 31
RE: Damage to FRONTIER Property
FRONTIER Claim Num:
WAFR16190400
Damage/Discovery Date:
08-02-2016
Damage Location:
8001 SIERRA DR, EDMONDS, WA
Damage County:
SNOHOMISH
Damage Amount:
UNDETERMINED
Dear Sir/Madam:
RECEIVED
A ill • r
EDMONDS CITY CLERK
Please be advised that FRONTIER Facilities sustained damage as a result of the negligent acts or
omissions by employees or agents of CITY OF EDMONDS.
Investigation has revealed that on or about 08-02-2016 employees or agents of CITY OF
EDMONDS, D AND G BACKHOE WAS DOING WORK FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND
DAMAGED A FRONTIER BURIED CABLE in the area of 8001 SIERRA DR, EDMONDS, WA.
This letter is the written presentment of FRONTIER's claim pursuant to Washington Statute (RCW
4.96.020(2)) .
REQUEST FOR GOVERNMENTAL NOTICE FORM
If your Governmental Entity requires the completion of its own form to complete proper notice, please
forward a copy to the address listed above. Every good faith effort has been made to identify the proper
office and address to perfect our notice. Please forward to your attorney, if misdirected, to contact us.
Matters herein stated are alleged on information and belief this pleader believes to be true. If there is
insurance to cover this matter, kindly advise as to the name of the insurance company, its address and the
claim number assigned. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact rq�NIV"t11't'�'���.�,
1-800-321-4158 ext 8232. ��•�0CAL F,V,
# 15003346
Sincerely, — E(p. 04110/19
Chelsea Dongelewic
NOTARY �.F OF...OV(N- >;
IIIIF1111111
CMR Claims DEPT Commission Expires
N
N
a�
E
L
0
E
2
U
N
t0
r
to
0
N
0
r
E
2
U
a�
c
0
U-
c
a�
E
t
c�
Q
Packet Pg. 30
4.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #221351 through #221460 dated August 18, 2016 for $634,145.54.
Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #62286 through #62295 for $513,710.39, benefit checks
#62296 through #62301 and wire payments of $562,429.15 for the pay period August 1, 2016 through
August 15, 2016.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
Financial Impact
Claims $634,145.54
Payroll Employee checks and direct deposit $513,710.39
Payroll Benefit checks and wire payments $562,429.15
Total Payroll $1,076,139.54
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claim cks 08-18-16
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 08-18-16
payroll summary 08-19-16
payroll benefit 08-19-16
Packet Pg. 31
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221351 8/18/2016 069798 A.M. LEONARD INC
221352 8/18/2016 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX
221353 8/18/2016 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
C116097380
PM: TOOLS AND SUPPLIES
PM: TOOLS AND SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Tota
816238
ESCC T-SHIRTS
ESCC t-shirts
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
9.8% Sales Tax
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
816328
SUMMER SOFTBALL SHIRTS
SUMMER SOFTBALL SHIRTS
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
221354 8/18/2016 060205 ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP 14190647-00
221355 8/18/2016 001528 AM TEST INC
221356 8/18/2016 070976 AMERESCO INC
93935
1
Tota
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
Tota
FAC MAINT - TRUCK SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Truck Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Tota
WWTP: ICP SCAN & MERCURY B
ICP Scan & Mercury by CVAA-
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Tota
WWTP: 7/3-7/30/16 PHASE 5 ENE
4.4.a
Page: 1
c
ca
lid
U
a�
CF
Amoun c
0-
m
614.0,
1 : 614.0, 'a
4-
w
c
m
354.4( -a
c
c�
34.7< o
a
1,680.2( E
164.6( u
I: 2,233.9� o
cu
CF >
0
a
173,844.8, Q
1 : 173,844.8,
r
to
59.9( m
ao
5.81 ao
I : 65.7 , w
Y �
E
ca
75.0(
1 : 75.0(
m
Ri E
R
.r
r
a
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 32
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
221356 8/18/2016 070976 AMERESCO INC (Continued)
2
221357 8/18/2016 074695 AMERICAN MESSAGING W4101046QH
221358 8/18/2016 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 161846-1673
221359 8/18/2016 075688 ANDOR, JOHNNY
221360 8/18/2016 001634 AQUA QUIP
221361 8/18/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
180853-1673
080516
1017155-1
1988721342
PO # Description/Account
Construction
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
Retainage
423.100.223.400
WWTP: PROF SERVICES FOR PF
Professional Services (including sale
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
Tota
WATER WATCH PAGER FEES
Water Watch Pager Fees
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
Tota
APA MEMBERSHIP-JEN MACHUG
MEMBERSHIP-JEN MACHUGA
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
APA MEMBERSHIP-KERNAN LIEN
MEMBERSHIP-KERNAN LIEN
001.000.62.558.60.49.00
Tota
ESCC STUDENT DEL DRIVER
Driving services for 2016 ESCC stu
138.200.21.557.21.49.00
Tota
WWTP: CHLORINE 3" SILK TABS
Chlorine 3" Silt Tabs
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
Tota
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
4.4.a
Page: 2
c
ca
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
82,385.1�
a�
L
-3,751.6( =a
4-
aD
c
53,008.5�
131,642.1;
c�
0
4.5. a
1 : 4.5,
%
4-
0
306.0(
0
a
369.0( Q
1 : 675.0(
r
to
de
400.0(
1 : 400.0(
r
0
N
499.9: U
M
49.0( 6
1 : 548.9'.
m
E
t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 33
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221361 8/18/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
1988731942
WWTP: UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MA
wwtp uniforms
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
wwtp mats & towels
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
1988731943
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
1988731944
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
1988735905
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT:
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
4.4.a
Page: 3
c
ca
hd
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
m
24.9(
a�
L
2.4z =a
d
c
5.1(
110.9E c�a
0
0.5(
c�
a
10.8E
U
w
56.7: 0
0
24.9( a
Q
2.4z r
1.6' m
r
ao
6.1' r
0
0
6.1' Y
6.1' •�
6.1'
m
6.0E
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 34
4.4.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
08/17/2016
9:03:24AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
W
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
221361
8/18/2016
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
a
9.8% Sales Tax
m
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.1(
9.8% Sales Tax
a�
L
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6( =a
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6(
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6(
9.8% Sales Tax
ca
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6( p
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.5t o-
1988735906
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
17.3,
9.8% Sales Tax
4-
C
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
0.6:
9.8% Sales Tax
o
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.7( a
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
Q
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
6.4( r
Total:
300.2i
221362
8/18/2016
075721 ARCON TENANT IMPROV CONTRACTOF 080216
HYDRANT METER RENTAL - DEPO:
Deposit less rental rate for 4 months,.
421.000.245.110
750.0( r
Total:
750.0( o
221363
8/18/2016
072576 ARTACCESS
14119
ARTACCESS
N
ARTACCESS
E
117.100.64.573.20.41.40
88.0( f°
Total:
88.0(
r
c
221364
8/18/2016
064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC
S 082097
ALERTON SYSTEM - PREV MAINT f
E
Alerton System - Prev Maint 8/1-10/3,
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 35
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221364 8/18/2016 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
221365 8/18/2016 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 44884
221366 8/18/2016 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC
221367 8/18/2016 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC
221368 8/18/2016 075344 BIRCH, BONNIE
45053
10747
10822
7969
8/9 CONCERT HMP
221369 8/18/2016 075391 BORGNES, PHILIP A 8/9 OUTDOOR MOVIES
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Tota
ROUGH BOX - SEAVER
ROUGH BOX - SEAVER
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
ROUGH BOX - HARRISON
ROUGH BOX - HARRISON
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
Tota
SENIOR SOFTBALL LEAGUE LO
SENIOR SOFTBALL LEAGUE LO
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
SUMMER TENNIS TOURNAMENT
SUMMER TENNIS TOURNAMENT
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.25.31.00
Tota
E6GA.SERVICES THRU 7/22/16
E6GA.Services thru 7/22/16
423.200.75.594.35.41.00
Tota
8/9/16 BONNIE BIRCH DUO CONC
8/9/16 BONNIE BIRCH DUO CONC
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Tota
8/9/16 OUTDOOR MOVIES NITES
4.4.a
Page: 5
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
2,866.5( -a)
280.9, aa)
L
3,147.4,
4-
aD
c
m
460.0(
c
c�
530.0(
990.0( a
WE E
W E f°
U
12.0( o
M
1.1E c
TI a
TI Q-
167.5( Q
16.4.
1 : 197.1(
r
ao
r
ao
2,847.6E w
1: 2,847.6E
E E
E
250.0(
1 : 250.0( m
E
2(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 36
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221369 8/18/2016 075391 BORGNES, PHILIPA
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
4.4.a
Page: 6
c
ca
hd
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
8/9/16 OUTDOOR MOVIES NITES 2(
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
2,500.0(
Total:
2,500.0( i
=a
221370 8/18/2016 075342 BORUCHOWITZ, ROBERT 2016-07 JULY PUBLIC DEFENSE COSTS
=
JULY 2016 PUBLIC DEFENSE COST
4-
c
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
770.8:
Total :
770.&
c
221371 8/18/2016 075723 BOWEN, HOLLY 8/12 REFUND 8/12/16 REFUND CLASS CANCELLE
f°
8/12/16 REFUND CLASS CANCELLE
0 L
001.000.239.200
70.0( M
Total:
70.0(
E
221372 8/18/2016 067391 BRAT WEAR 19502 INV#19502 - EDMONDS PD - HARD\
EMBROIDER NAME TAG ON SHIRT!
,-
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
24.0( c
REMOVE/REPLACE NAMETAG-SHIP
>
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
20.0( a
REMOVE /REPLACE NAMETAG-JUN
Q.
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
12.0( Q
SEW SGT CHEVRONS ON SHIRTS,
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
20.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
7.4E
19503 INV#19503 - EDMONDS PD - HARD\
00
r
METAL NAMETAG - HARDWICK
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
14.9E w
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
1.4 1 E
Total :
99.81 'ca
221373 8/18/2016 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 20938 YOGA 20938 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20938 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
180.4E t
R
.r
r
a
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 37
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221373 8/18/2016 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
221374 8/18/2016 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL
221375 8/18/2016 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
20944 YOGA 20944 YOGA INSTRUCTION
20944 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
4.4.a
Page: 7
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
U)
0
a
m
351.0(
L
Total : 531.4E 'a
14272889 WWTP: 7/1-7/28/16 EDMONDS SEC
a
Task Order 1: Ph. 101 & Ph 102.-
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
1,953.0(
O&M Professional Services: Task Orc
c�
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
116.5( _
Total:
2,069.5( o
316058 PW YARD - ROCK
PW Yard - Rock
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
PW Yard - Rock
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
PW Yard - Rock
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
PW Yard - Rock
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
317258 PW YARD - ROCK
PW Yard - Rock
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
PW Yard - Rock
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
PW Yard - Rock
c�
a
E
312.5(
4-
0
312.5(
0
312.5( a
Q.
Q
312.5E
r
to
30.6:
m
30.6: r
r
30.6< c
N
30.6: U
E
.2
966.2' U
r
c
m
966.2' E
t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 38
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221375 8/18/2016 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
PW Yard - Rock
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
4.4.a
Page: 8
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
966.2' -0a
966.2' aUi
L
=a
94.6E
W
c
94.6E
94.6E c�a
0
94.6E
c�
Total: 5,616.31 a
221376 8/18/2016 075278 BURNS, HOUSTON 8/5-8/12 FIELD ATTEN
8/5-8/12/16 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTEI`
E
8/5-8/12/16 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTEI`
U
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
135.0( o
Total:
135.0( 16-
0
221377 8/18/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 16286969
CONTRACT CHARGE FOR COPIER
a
Monthly contract charge for Council
Q-
Q
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
27.9�
9.8% Sales Tax
to
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
2.7E
Total:
30.71 m
r
221378 8/18/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC 9433752440
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
r
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
105.0( w
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.9E E
9433752441
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
ca
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
55.0(
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
5.Z
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 39
4.4.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 9
08/17/2016
9:03:24AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
a�
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
221378
8/18/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC
(Continued)
a
9433752442
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
m
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
55.0( i
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
5.2:
9433768489
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
c
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
55.0(
9.5% Sales Tax
ca
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
5.2< o
9433768491
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
a
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
105.0( E
9.5% Sales Tax
.@
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.9£ U
9433805673
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
o
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
352.1( o
9.5% Sales Tax
a
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
33.4E Q
9433813609
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
r
Roadway - Asphalt
to
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
320.6(
9.5% Sales Tax
m
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
r
30.4(
9433820861
STREET -CEMENT
r
Street - Cement
o
111.000.68.542.61.31.00
171.7E Y
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.61.31.00
16.3, .
Total : 1,335.X
221379
8/18/2016 064291 CENTURY LINK
206-Z02-0478
r
WWTP: 8/2/16 TELEMETRY CIRCU
m
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES-
E
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
147.5z
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 40
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221379 8/18/2016 064291 064291 CENTURY LINK
221380 8/18/2016 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
PLN20160030
PLN20160031
221381 8/18/2016 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 12408
221382 8/18/2016 065519 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 2016 #2
221383 8/18/2016 075291 CLEARSTREAM RECYCLING 2017
221384 8/18/2016 072848 COPIERS NW 1423581
1423582
PO # Description/Account
Tota
PLN20160030 RESTROOM LAND
PLN20160030 RESTROOM LAND
132.000.64.594.76.65.00
PLN20160031 RESTROOM LAND
PLN20160031 RESTROOM LAND
132.000.64.594.76.65.00
Tota
E7AC.SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
E7AC.Signal Maintenance
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
Tota
NARCOTICS BUY FUND - EDMON
NARCOTICS BUY FUND - 2016 #2
104.100.41.521.21.49.00
Tota
RECYCLE - BAGS / SHIPPING
Recycle - Bags / Shipping
421.000.74.537.90.49.00
Tota
INV#1423581 ACCT#HMH636 - ED
LEASE #IRC5045 7/5 TO 8/4/16
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
INV#1423582 ACCT#HMH636 - ED
4,425 B/W COPIES 7/5 TO 8/4/16
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
2,954 COLOR COPIES 7/5 TO 8/4/
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
4.4.a
Page: 10
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
1 : 147.51 0
am
m
1,637.0(
U: a
c
1,662.0(
1 : 3,299.0(
c
c�
0
L
1,707.7( ca
1,707.7(
E
D M
U
w
5,000.0( c
I: 5,000.0( >
0
Q
L
Q.
Q
186.3( r
186.3(
M m
r
ao
226.7, r
0
0
22.2, Y
M
E
35.4(
1 E
138.81
E
t
17.0E
.r
r
Q
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 41
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221384 8/18/2016 072848 072848 COPIERS NW
221385 8/18/2016 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
221386 8/18/2016 075153 DOPPS, MARIA
221387 8/18/2016 007253 DUNN LUMBER
221388 8/18/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
4.4.a
Page: 11
c
lid
ca
U
w
U
_ Amoun };
(Continued) Total: 440.3' 0
m
16-3684 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8/02/2016
08/02/2016 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE:
001.000.25.514.30.41.00 561.0(
Total: 561.0(
13397
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
13568
INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
Tota
4132194
PM: LUMBER
PM: LUMBER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4138667
FAC MAINT - RAIN JACKET - D H
Fac Maint - Rain Jacket - D Housler
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
Tota
1-00655
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON S
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON S
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
1-00925
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
1-01950
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AV
a
c
m
100.8E c
c�
0
100.8E ca
1 : 201.7,
E
w
34.3( c
c�
3.2E o
OL a
i
a
66.3(
6.3(
1 : 110.2;
T r
T o
41.1 0 Y
AV
AV E
w
44.7' U
E
r
44.7' E
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 42
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221388 8/18/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
221389
221390
221391
221392
8/18/2016 075566 EHRBAR, PAMELA
8/18/2016 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
1-03950
1-05350
1-05705
1-13975
1-14000
BID-081216
152614
8/18/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR44486
8/18/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH713537
PO # Description/Account
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (NORTH) 20
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTO
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 20
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 20
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / M
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / M
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METE
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
CITY HALL 115 5TH AVE N / METE
CITY HALL 115 5TH AVE N / METE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
Tota
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 7/26
Administrative Serivices for Ed!, BID
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
Tota
RADIX MONTHLY MAINTAGREEM
Radix Monthly Maint Agreement -
421.000.74.534.80.48.00
Tota
COPIER OVERAGE CHARGE
Copier overage charges for Council
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
LEGAL ADS-PLN20160033
Tota
4.4.a
Page: 12
c
ca
N
U)
lid
a�
_ Amoun };
0
0-
0 -0a
+.
622.3� m
L
0
0 •'
125.1E
El
El
83.8(
R o
R
602.1 1 a
R
R
143.9E
I: 1,708.0E '0-8 >
0
L
a
1,306.5( Q
I : 1,306.5(
r
E
152.0(
1 : 152.0( co
ao
0
N
11.8E E
w
1.1( 6
1 : 13.0'
m
E
t
R
.r
r
a
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 43
4.4.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 13
08/17/2016
9:03:24AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
a�
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
221392
8/18/2016
009350
EVERETT DAILY HERALD
(Continued)
a
LEGAL ADS-PLN20160033
m
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
56.7(
Total:
56.7E i
=a
221393
8/18/2016
063953
EVERGREEN STATE HEAT & A/C
31504
CITY HALL - COOLING SYSTEM REI
=
City Hall - Cooling System Repairs
4-
c
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
235.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
23.0, c�
Total:
258.01 o
221394
8/18/2016
066378
FASTENAL COMPANY
WAMOU40798
STORM - EYEWARE
L
Storm - Eyeware
Q"
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
43.7( .
9.8% Sales Tax
f°
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
4.2� o
WAMOU40854
WWTP: AB -NYLON INSERTS 1/4T
AB -NYLON INSERTS 1/4T
@
o
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
5.3, a
9.8% Sales Tax
Q
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
0.5,
Total:
53.9,
221395
8/18/2016
009815
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
0517441
METER - #2036 M-METERIPERL-01
Meter - #2036 M-METERIPERL-01-0
t°
r
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
2,437.8(
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
238.9( w
Total:
2,676.7(
E
221396
8/18/2016
075536
FREGON ESE ASSOCIATES
438-007
HWY 99 SUBAREA PLAN -CONSULT
M
HWY 99 SUBAREA PLAN -CONSULT
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
9,317.5(
Total:
9,317.5(
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 44
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221397 8/18/2016 011900 FRONTIER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
253-011-1177
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
425-712-0417
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
425-712-0423
WWTP: 8/7-9/6/16 AFTER HOUR BU
WWTP: AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LI
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
425-712-8251
PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX,
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN'
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
425-745-4313
CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M
CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSIOI`
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
4.4.a
Page: 14
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
6.3�
a�
L
24.2� =a
4-
24.2� c
m
24.2�
c�
24.Z o
L
24.3( a
E
33.3E u
4-
0
33.3E
0
L
Q
Q.
71.2( Q
r
16.Z
m
r
81.4:
r
ao
68.4( G
N
68.4( 0
M
91.1E 6
c
am
131.5(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 45
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
221397 8/18/2016 011900 FRONTIER (Continued)
425-771-4741
425-775-1344
425-775-7865
221398 8/18/2016 075163 GARCIA-GARCIA, CESAR 13719
221399 8/18/2016 011480 GAYDOS, KEN GAYDOS 07/16
221400 8/18/2016 075725 GIRLS ROCK MATH 2O913 GIRLS ROCK MAT
PO # Description/Account
4.4.a
Page: 15
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
0-
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/II
m
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/II
130.000.64.536.20.42.00
83.3' m
L
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
001.000.64.571.23.42.00
64.6(
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI'
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
66.5<
INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
Tota
Tota
GAYDOS INT'L CONF OF POLICE
AIRFARE TO/FM NEW MEXICO
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
LUNCH - 7/10 @ HOTEL RESTAU
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
BREAKFAST 7/11 @ HOTEL REST)
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
BREAKFAST 7/12 @ HOTEL REST
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
SIX NIGHTS LODGING @ CONFE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
Tota
20913 GIRLS ROCK MATH CAMP
20913 GIRLS ROCK MATH CAMP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
937.4' o
155.3, •�
155.3, U
4-
0
RA
l
c�
0
429.2( a
Q.
250.0( Q
�
20.2(
.,
m
12.6( r
AI 06
r
12.6( c
RE w
829.4z
I: 1,554.1( E
r
c
3,894.0(
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 46
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
221400
8/18/2016 075725 075725 GIRLS ROCK MATH
221401
8/18/2016 075726 GORDON & MARLENE HORMAN
221402 8/18/2016 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS
221403 8/18/2016 072417 HAGAN, SUSAN
221404 8/18/2016 013140 HENDERSON, BRIAN
221405 8/18/2016 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
4.4.a
Page: 16
c
ca
lid
U
w
U
_ Amoun };
(Continued) Total: 3,894.0( a
m
3-15225 #611133690-TW UTILITY REFUND
#611133690-TW Utility refund due to
411.000.233.000 134.9E
Total: 134.9E
672903
8/11 REFUND
001
221406 8/18/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1024879
1083615
OLD PW SECURITY
Old PW Security
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Tota
8/11/16 REFUND CLASS CANCEL
8/11/16 REFUND CLASS CANCEL
001.000.239.200
Tota
LEOFF 1 REIMBURSEMENT CLAI
LEOFF 1 PRESC. REIMBURSEME
009.000.39.517.20.23.00
Tota
ESFB.SERVICES THRU 7/1/16
ESFB.Services thru 7/1/16
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
Tota
CITY HALL DEV SVC PERMIT CO
City Hall Dev Svc Permit Counter
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
CITY PARK BUILDING - SUPPLIES
City Park Building - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
a
c
m
55.0( c
1 : 55.0(
0
L
LE
L E Q-
52.0( E
1 : 52.0(
U
w
M o
N'
64.8( o
I : 64.8( a
Q
r
0
6,250.4'
1 : 6,250.4' m
r
r
0
71.1: Y
6.7E E
r
27.7z r-
E
2.61
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 47
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221406 8/18/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
14662
FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Truck Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
2022079
FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Truck Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
2022135
MUSEUM - SUPPLIES
Museum - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
22365
FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Truck Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
22413
WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
23197
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
24978
CITY HALL DEV SVC PERMIT CO
4.4.a
Page: 17
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
a)
11.1: aa)
L
=a
1.0f
a�
c
m
57.8(
c�
5.5( o
L
0
a
26.9: E
2.5E
4-
0
U�
ca
30.9z o
a
Q.
2.9z Q
r
251.0:
m
r
23.8E ao
r
06
0
54.5z Y
5.1E .
�
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 48
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
221406 8/18/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued)
33390
33391
4574259
5011507
5021744
520121
573196
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
WATER RETURNS
Water Returns
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
WATER SUPPLIES
Water Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
City Hall Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
CITY HALL DEV SVC PERMIT CO
City Hall Dev Svc Permit Counter
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Truck Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.4.a
Page: 18
U�
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
6.2z -0a
a�
L
-68.8,
4
m
52.3:
0
4.9,
ca
a
E
37.9z
3.6( o
0
0
L
23.8E a
Q
2.21 r
0
18.6E m
r
ao
1.71 r
0
N
Y
61.4<
E
5.8z
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 49
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
221406 8/18/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued)
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
6010068
CITY HALL DEV SVC PERMIT CO
4.4.a
Page: 19
U�
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
1.0z
�
65.5E
d
c
6.2:
c
c�
10.4z o
UN E
2.8.
4-
0
0.21
0
a
Q.
25.8( Q
r
2.4:
m
r
60.9E
r
00
5.7� o
N
29.9E .E
c�
2.8:
m
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 50
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221406 8/18/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
7096921
SEWER - SUPPLIES
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
8021211
FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Truck Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
8024010
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
80292
ROADWAY SUPPLIES
Roadway Supplies
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
8590649
ROADWAY - SUPPLIES
Roadway - Supplies
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9013361
CITY HALL DEV SVC PERMIT CO
City Hall Dev Svc Permit Counter
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9014795
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES
4.4.a
Page: 20
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
116.8, -0a
11.1( aUi
L
4-
37.9E c
m
3.6'
c�
0 j 44.8, ,
ca
a
4.2E
U
102.9z o
9.7E o
a
0.
Q
46.4E r
to4.4,
m
r
ao
92.9E
0
8.8< Y
Uh 0
E
29.1 � 2
r
2.70 a0i
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 51
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221406 8/18/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
221407
221408
8/18/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
9025107
9053756
2831265
KE-19191910111
2836906
8/18/2016 068712 INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES LLC 141321
PO # Description/Account
Gymnastics Supplies
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
TRAFFIC SUPPLIES
Traffic Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Tota
WWTP: LINERS RETURNED/CRE
Genuine Joe trash liners 39X56
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: 43X46 TRASH CAN LINER
Genuine Joe 43X46 TRASH CAN LI
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: RETURNED LINERS FRO
returned Genuine Joe 39X56 trash
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Tota
HYDRANT USE PERMIT DEPOSIT
Hydrant Use Permit Deposit Refund
4.4.a
Page: 21
c
ca
lid
U
W
Amoun };
0
a
am
23.7 1
a�
L
2.2E
4.
W
c
40.7E M
3.8, m
E
1.8( 'M
I: 1,624.5E U
0
DI
0
L
35.9E a
Q
3.5< r
S
N
31.6E m
r
3.1'
M 00
0
ca Y
-35.9� U
E
-3.5: 2
1 : 34.8(
c
R m
E
t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 52
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
221408 8/18/2016 068712 INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES LLC (Continued)
221409
221410
221411
E2GB.Ret Release
8/18/2016 075661 JANET MAPLES DESIGN /IZZY GIRL BID-08052016
8/18/2016 075378 JUMPIN J'S JUMP ROPE CHAMPS 21191 JUMP ROPE CAMP
8/18/2016 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 300051685
221412 8/18/2016 074135 LAFAVE, CAROLYN
081516
PO # Description/Account
421.000.245.110
E2GB.RETAINAGE RELEASE
E2GB.Retainage Release
423.000.223.400
Tota
SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT 8/1
Social Media Management for 8/1-8
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
Tota
21191 JUMP ROPE CAMP INSTRU
21191 JUMP ROPE CAMP INSTRU
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Tota
INV#300051685 ACCT#100828 - E
HON COMFORTASK CHAIRS
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
Tota
ESCC STUDENT DELEGATION
mileage for ESCC student delegatio
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
ESCC student delegation welcome
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
ESCC student delegation luncheon
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
ESCC student delegation lucheons
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
ESCC student delegation UW Activi
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
ESCC student delegation lunches
4.4.a
Page: 22
c
ca
lid
U
W
_ Amoun };
0
a
950.0( -0)
U
a�
L
6,901.5z
1 : 7,851.5�
W
4 a0i
/1
510.0(
1 : 510.0( —
0
L
C >'
0
C 0'
2,047.5( ,
I: 2,047.5(
w
DI 0
0
978.6( o
a
Q.
95.9( Q
I : 1,074.5(
n
r
15.0(
s
di r
247.3( c
Y
150.9<
113.1(
ty
56.3(
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 53
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221412 8/18/2016 074135 LAFAVE, CAROLYN
221413 8/18/2016 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING
221414 8/18/2016 069862 MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND
221415 8/18/2016 019582 MANOR HARDWARE
221416 8/18/2016 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN
221417 8/18/2016 075722 MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
ESCC student delegation thank you
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
Tota
4487511
INVOICE#4487511 SHREDDING S
INVOICE#4487511-
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
INVOICE#4487511-
001.000.31.514.23.41.00
Tota
1438-21
ECDC REWRITE -CONSULTING
ECDE REWRITE -CONSULTING
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
1438-22
ECDC REWRITE ADDENDUM -CO
ECDC REWRITE ADDENDUM -CO
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
Tota
728634-00
TRAFFIC - TOOL REPAIR
Traffic - Tool Repair
111.000.68.542.64.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.48.00
4.4.a
Page: 23
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
129.5, -0a
c +.
3.7£
L
1 : 716.0E
Ef a
c
m
2.3<
c
c�
2.3: o
1 : 4.6E
c�
a
E
2,935.0(
N: w
0
N:
369.2E c
I: 3,304.2E a
0.
i
a
0
36.0(
3.5<
Total : 39.5: ao
r
50 LEOFF 1 REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM o
LEOFF 1 LTC REIMBURSEMENT Y
009.000.39.517.20.29.00 8,410.5(
Total: 8,410.5(
11009196 WWTP: PVC TYPE I SHEETS
PVC TYPE I SHEETS
m
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 82.3, E
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 54
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221417 8/18/2016 075722 MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
221418 8/18/2016 075559 MUSIC CENTER OF THE NORTHWEST 8/7 CONCERT CP
221419 8/18/2016 074724 NEWMAN-BURROW LLC
221420 8/18/2016 075724 NORMAN, BILL
221421 8/18/2016 025690 NOYES, KARIN
221422 8/18/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
51733
8/10 REFUND
000 00 670
654083
734860
PO # Description/Account
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Tota
8/7/16 CONCERT CP CENTERPIE(
8/7/16 CONCERT CP CENTERPIE(
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Tota
FALL DIGITAL CRAZE
FALL DIGITAL CRAZE
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
Tota
8/10/16 REFUND
8/10/16 REFUND
001.000.239.200
Tota
PLANNING BOARD MIN-7.27.16
PLANNING BOARD MIN-7.27.16
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
Tota
PW - OFFICE SUPPLIES
PW - Office Supplies
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
PM: CARTRIDGES, USB DRIVES
PM: CARTRIDGES, USB DRIVES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4.4.a
Page: 24
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
8.0 1
90.35
=a
4-
aD
c
500.0(
500.0(
c
c�
0
512.0( ca
512.0(
E
U
8.0( o
8.0( >
0
L
Q
Q.
Q
245.0( r
245.0(
m
r
ao
31.9( o
0
3.1z Y
E
201.9(
r
19.8(
Total : 256.8E
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
221423 8/18/2016 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER July, 2016
221424 8/18/2016 073714 OLBRECHTS & ASSOC PLLC
221425 8/18/2016 064068 PACIFIC ART PRESS
JULY HE SVCS
65765
PO # Description/Account
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSIN
Emergency Medical Services & Traun
001.000.237.120
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.237.130
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.237.150
State Patrol Death Investigation
001.000.237.330
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.237.180
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.237.200
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.237.250
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.237.290
Multi -Model Transportation
001.000.237.300
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis
001.000.237.170
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
Total
JULY HE SVCS PLN20160031 PLN21
JULY HE SVCS PLN20160031 PLN21
132.000.64.594.76.41.00
Total
STAGES BROCHURE
STAGES BROCHURE
4.4.a
Page: 25
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
1,344.5'
a�
L
27,133.1' =a
4-
209.0( c
m
41.8E
c�
6,359.8< 0
L
96.4z a
E
2,662.0( 'M
U
w
525.4( 0
33.3: o
a
Q.
33.3: Q
66.5'
42.8:
238.1'
38,786.4; w
v
E
2
784.0( U
784.0( r
c
m
E
t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
221425
8/18/2016
064068 PACIFIC ART PRESS
(Continued)
123.000.64.573.20.49.00
9.8% Sales Tax
123.000.64.573.20.49.00
Tota
221426
8/18/2016
065051 PARAMETRIX INC
21-24106
WWTP: 7/3-7/31/16 PLC&SCADA
Tota
221428 8/18/2016 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 19651 INV 19651 EDMONDS PD - JULY 2
PEP ONLINE TEST (2)
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
Tota
221429 8/18/2016 064552 PITNEY BOWES 06906203 CANCELATION CONTRACT#16077
CANCELATION OF PITNEY BOWE
001.000.25.514.30.45.00
Tota
221430 8/18/2016 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC J974488 WWTP: FORCE K/O PCH
FORCE K/O PCH
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
4.4.a
Page: 26
SY
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
0-
518.7( -a)
50.8: aa)
L
I : 569.5:
a
c
c(
17,172.8(
en
c�
4,080.0( o
11,028.3E ma-
1 32,281.2!
U
4-
0
166.0(
0
16.2 1 a
1 : 182.2 i Q
0' r
40.0( "
1 : 40.0(
ao
3( r
ao
S c
250.0(
1 : 250.0(
1,443.1z
r
a
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221430 8/18/2016 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
221431 8/18/2016 072384 PLAY-WELLTEKNOLOGIES
221432 8/18/2016 073231 POLYDYNE INC
221433 8/18/2016 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
221434 8/18/2016 075719 ROOSENDAAL, CRAIG
221435 8/18/2016 075637 SCHNEIDER, P DIANE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
J989838
WWTP: SRNRELF CRDCN, COND
ISRNRELF CRDCN, CONDUITS, R
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Tota
21202 LEGO CAMPS
21202 LEGO CAMPS
21202 LEGO CAMPS
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
21203 LEGO CAMPS
21203 LEGO CAMPS
21203 LEGO CAMPS
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Tota
1069227
WWTP: CLARIFLOC
Clarifloc
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
Tota
03870 PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FO
PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FO
422.000.72.531.90.51.00
Tota
BLD2016-0648 PERMIT REFUND
PERMIT REFUND
001.000.257.620
Tota
13606 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
4.4.a
Page: 27
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
141.4< -0a
U +.
D
L
48.8 1
4.7� c
I : 1,638Z
c
c�
R
R
2,352.0(
ca
a
2,688.0( •�
I: 5,040.0(
w
0
0
8,184.0( a
I : 8,184.0( Q
r
�
2,770.7� "
I : 2,770.75 t°
ao
ao
0
900.0( Y
1 : 900.0(
r
107.6. or)
Total: 107.6, E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 58
4.4.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 28
08/17/2016
9:03:24AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
a�
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
221436
8/18/2016
072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC
61416310
WWTP: FILTER CARTRIDGE PD10
0
FILTER CARTRIDGE PD10
a
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
238.9z
Freight
L
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
16.6z =a
Total:
255.51
a�
221437
8/18/2016
074911 SEATTLE HEALTHY POOLS
390
YOST POOL TILE WORK
m
YOST POOL TILE WORK
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
414.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
—
0
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
40.5 1
391
YOST POOL LANE LINES
a
YOST POOL LANE LINES
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
874.0E
9.8% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.31.00
85.6E o
397
YOST POOL TILE WORK
0
YOST POOL TILE WORK
0
0
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
L
322.0( 0-
9.8% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
31.5(
Total:
r
1,767.81
221438
8/18/2016
074906 SITE WORKSHOP LLC
4220
VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE AR
.,
VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE AR
m
r
132.000.64.594.76.41.00
1,562.2E °r°
Total:
1,562.2E c
221439
8/18/2016
065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY
20900 SKYHAWKS
20900 SKYHAWKS
N
20900 SKYHAWKS
E
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
542.5( 'ca
20901 SKYHAWKS
20901 SKYHAWKS
20901 SKYHAWKS
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
1,721.2E
20905 SKYHAWKS
20905 SKYHAWKS
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 59
4.4.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 29
08/17/2016
9:03:24AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
a�
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
221439
8/18/2016
065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY
(Continued)
a
20905 SKYHAWKS
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
625.6,
20906 SKYHAWKS
20906 SKYHAWKS
aci
L
20906 SKYHAWKS
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
828.1 , E.
20907 SKYHAWKS
20907 SKYHAWKS
w
c
20907 SKYHAWKS
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
2,247.5( -o
20911 SKYHAWKS
20911 SKYHAWKS
20911 SKYHAWKS
o
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
1,666.2E j,
Total:
7,631.21 a
221440
8/18/2016
037303 SNO CO FIRE DIST # 1
16-113
INV#16-113 - EDMONDS PD
NITRILE GLOVES - LARGE
U
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
394.8( p
NITRILE GLOVES - MEDIUM
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
98.7( p
NITRILE GLOVES - EXTRA LARGE
a
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
98.7( Q
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
r
58.0:
Total:
650Z v
221441
8/18/2016
037801 SNO CO HUMAN SERVICE DEPT
1000416702
Q2-16 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS &'
r
Quarterly Liquor Board Profits
00
r
001.000.39.566.10.51.00
1,742.6, c
Quarterly Liquor Excise Taxes
w
001.000.39.566.10.51.00
854.1'
Total:
29596.7! E
221442
8/18/2016
037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2002-0255-4
WWTP: 7/7-8/8/16 FLOW METER 24
WWTP: 7/7 - 8/8/16 FLOW METER 2
c
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
18.5,
t
2004-9683-4
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221442 8/18/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
2006-5164-4
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2007-2302-1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
2008-6924-6
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACF
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACF
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2011-8453-8
HICKMAN PARK
HICKMAN PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2014-3123-6
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
2014-5305-7
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2017-9000-3
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
2019-2988-2
WWTP: 7/7-8/8/16 FLOW METER 84
WWTP FLOW METER 8421 244TH
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
2022-5062-7
9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED
9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2022-8945-0
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
2044-2584-7
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
4.4.a
Page: 30
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
58.1:
a�
L
728.3� V.
a)
c
m
24.3(
c�
0
31.2: j,
0
a
E
74.2z
4-
0
15.1 0
0
L
a
Q.
58.5: Q
r
0
21.1E
m
r
ao
18.5z r
0
0
N
Y
15.7<
E
76.1:
c
m
E
37.8(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221442 8/18/2016 037375 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
221443 8/18/2016 069043 SOLEIL, MAYA
221444 8/18/2016 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
221445 8/18/2016 072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT
221446 8/18/2016 074877 SYRENS VOICE
4.4.a
Voucher List
Page: 31
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
U
a�
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
(Continued)
Total:
1,178.0' 0
m
8/11 CONCERT HMP
8/11/16 CONCERT HMP MAYA SOLE
8/11/16 CONCERT HMP MAYA SOLE
U
W
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
600.0(
Total:
600.0(
4-
a�
104757
WWTP: 7/16 ROLLOFF ASH DISPO:
m
Ash Disposal for WWTP
423.000.76.535.80.47.65
3,422.1 E c
20921 BEACH CAMP
20929 BEACH CAMP
8/4 CONCERT HMP
221447 8/18/2016 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18126185
18126668
18127078
Tota
20921 BEACH CAMP
20921 BEACH CAMP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
20929 BEACH CAMP SLEEPOVER
20929 BEACH CAMP SLEEPOVER
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Tota
8/4/16 CONCERT HMP SEASTAR
8/4 CONCERT HMP
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Tota
STORM - MARKING PAINT, SUPPL
Storm - Marking Paint, Supplies
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
STORM -WORK GLOVES
Storm -Work Gloves
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
ROADWAY - SUPPLIES
Roadway - Supplies
3,422.1(
0
L
a
13,588.0( E
U
w
11,448.0( o
25,036.0( >
0
L
Q
Q.
Q
400.0( r
400.0(
m
r
ao
287.0' r
0
28.1 < Y
E
174.9,
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
221447 8/18/2016 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued)
221448 8/18/2016 073621 TANIMURA, NAOAKI
221449 8/18/2016 075491 TAYLOR'S EXCAVATORS INC
21068 KENDO
21069 KENDO
E3DB.Pmt 7
221450 8/18/2016 075139 THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP INC 108311
221451 8/18/2016 075560 TREJO SAVANI, ELSPETH
221452 8/18/2016 068407 TROUT UNLIMITED
221453 8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
8/14 CONCERT
21216 FISH FOR KIDS
0781
PO # Description/Account
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
Tota
21068 KENDO INSTRUCTION
21068 KENDO INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
21069 KENDO INSTRUCTION
21069 KENDO INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Tota
E3DB.PMT 7 THRU 6/3/16
E3DB.Pmt 7 thru 6/3/16
112.000.68.595.33.65.00
E3DB.Ret. 7
112.000.223.400
Tota
E4FE.SERVICES THRU 7/1/16
E4FE.Services thru 7/1/16
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
Tota
8/14 CONCERT ORCHESTRA ZAR
8/14 CONCERT ORCHESTRA ZAR
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Tota
21216 FISHING FOR KIDS INSTR
21216 FISHING FOR KIDS INSTR
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Tota
COUNCIL CREDIT CARD
4.4.a
Page: 32
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
79.9:
7.8z aa)
L
594.9�
4-
a�
c
m
228.0(
c
c�
1,361.0(
1,589.0( a
E
ns
U
49,653.0� o
-2,482.6( c
47,170.4: a
Q.
Q
r
CO
6,076.5(
1 : 6,076.5( "
m
r
A
A r
ao
1,100.0( c
1 : 1,100.0( Y
UC E
UC
169.4(
1 : 169.4( y
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 63
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221453 8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
PCC Food for Counicl Meeting
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
QFC Food for Council Meeting
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
Office Depot - Namebadges for Coun
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
Coscto - July 4 Parade Supplies
001.000.11.511.60.31.00
2519
INV#2519 08/08/16 - POLICE #1 - El
MAIL FLASHLIGHTS FOR REPAIR
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
AIRFAIR/KINNEY-BCKGRD CHECK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
MEAL/KINNEY-BCKGRD CHECK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
FUEL/KINNEY-BCKGRD CHECK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
PARKING/KINNEY-BCKGRD CHECK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
MEAL/KINNEY-BCKGRD CHECK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
LODGING/KINNEY-BCKGRD CHECI•
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
PROMOTION CERT - HARDWICK
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
2985
WWTP: 8/16 CC-STAPLER,MICROP
Staples - USB Microphone & Cable-
423.000.76.535.80.35.00
Market Forge Door Gasket Replacem
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
3249
PASSPORT MAILING
PASSPORT MAILING
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
3314
INV#3314 08/08/16 - LAWLESS - ED
4.4.a
Page: 33
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
53.6'
a�
L
6.9£ =a
µ..
98.7( c
m
191.8z c
ca
0
16.8( L>%
c�
a
783.2(
24.4E
4-
0
24.01
0
L
46.7E Q
Q
40.2' r
0
218.9(
m
r
120.0 1 a0
r
ao
0
192.7'
U
32.9E
c
109.6E
t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221453 8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
FATAL PLUS SOLUTION -ANIMAL CC
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
250 - 1OX13 BROWN ENVELOPES
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
250 - 9X12 BROWN ENVELOPES
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
3520
INV#3520 08/08/16 - POLICE #2 - EE
ENERGIZER 2032 BATTERIES
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
DURACELL 9 V BATTERIES
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
LEATHER MTRCYCL JACKET-STRU
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
OMNIVORE 1 YR REN. 7/21-7/20/17
001.000.41.521.21.35.00
EPD PROMO PENS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
FEDEX CHG #16-16747,17080
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG #16-17518
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG RETURN TO BRATWE/
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG #15-3344
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG #13664
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG #16-18386
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
4675
NORBERTS: SPOTTING BELT FOR
NORBERTS: SPOTTING BELT FOR
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
ARTS NORTHWEST: MEMBERSHIP
117.100.64.573.20.49.00
4.4.a
Page: 34
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
75.5(
a�
L
38.2E =a
4-
42.1 � c
m
16.7: c�a
0
20.81 L>%
c�
a
1,230.0(
99.0( U
4-
0
270.9:
0
L
15.4: a
Q
15.3' r
14.0'
m
r
17.5( ao
r
ao
17.5(
N
15.3' U
482.6,
m
145.0( t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 34
Packet Pg. 65
4.4.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 35
08/17/2016
9:03:24AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
a�
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
221453
8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
(Continued)
a
ORIENTAL TRADING CO: SUPPLIES
m
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
218.4E
AMAZON: TENNIS NET
a0i
L
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
334.0( 15
FASTSIGNS: SIGN LF
117.200.64.575.50.49.00
121.0E
VISTAPRINT: EXPO BANNERS
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
168.8'
QUICKEXHIBITS: EXPO BANNERS-
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
440.8: p
AMAZON: LAMINATING POUCH WA
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
44.6z a
EBAY: ALPHABET ANIMALS FOR FP
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
31.91, 5
CONSUMER CRAFTS: SUMMER CA
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
w
15.6E C
AMAZON: CAMP GT STORAGE SHE
f°
001.000.64.571.26.31.00
58.1. o
OFFICE DEPOT: WOTS SUPPLIES
Q'
Q.
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
253.9� Q
AMAZON: WELDER ADAPER GENE
r
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
92.6<
AMAZON: CAMP GT STORAGE SHE
001.000.64.571.26.31.00
58.1,
4697
MAYOR'S MEETING LUNCH
ao
Sno Cty Cities Dinner
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
35.0(
markers
138.200.21.557.21.31.00
13.9E
poster paints
5
138.200.21.557.21.31.00
29.9� 6
brush set c
138.200.21.557.21.31.00 9.3E E
glitter markers
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 35
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221453 8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
138.200.21.557.21.31.00
2016 Mayor's Meeting Luncheon
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
2016 Mayor's Meeting luncheon tip
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
2016 Mayor's Meeting luncheon ice
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
ESCC student delegation Burke Muse
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
ESCC student delegation Mariners
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
EASC Port Report
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
ESCC welcome dinner supplies
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
9.8% Sales Tax
138.200.21.557.21.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
5179 COMPUTER STUFF
Amazon - Wellness Committee suppl
001.000.22.518.10.49.00
Amazon - iPad cases for Water/Sewe
421.000.74.534.80.35.00
Amazon - iPad cases for Water/Sewe
423.000.75.535.80.35.00
Newegg.com - Intel NUC BOXNUC61!
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
Newegg.com - Kingston 8GB Ram 2E
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
Curvature - Catalyst 3650 Standalone
001.000.31.518.87.35.00
Newegg.com - ORICO M31-14 High Sr
001.000.31.518.88.31.00
4.4.a
Page: 36
c
ca
lid
U
W
Amoun };
0
a
14.9( -0)
1,799.4( i
=a
150.0(
W
c
5.01
50.0( c�a
0
360.0( L>%
ca
a
25.0(
117.7� U
0
2.Z
0
L
176.3: a
Q
r
38.9(
140.4' m
r
ao
140.4' o
0
1, 322.2,
91.6z
2, 099.8 0
m
110.81 t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 36
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221453 8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
Newegg.com - Intel NUC BOXNUC61!
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
Newegg.com - Kingston ValueRAM 81
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
BulkRegister.com - Domain Name
001.000.31.518.88.49.00
Newegg.com - APC Back -UPS ES 35
001.000.31.518.88.31.00
Abe's of Maine - Samsung 4K UHD
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
Newegg.com - Intel NUC BOXNUC61!
001.000.31.518.88.35.00
Newegg.com - Rosewill RCDC-1401E?
001.000.31.518.88.31.00
BulkRegister - Domain Name Registri
001.000.31.518.88.49.00
Amazon - Microsoft Power Supply for
001.000.31.518.88.31.00
Newegg.com - ID TECH IDMB-33513
001.000.31.518.88.31.00
Amazon - Surface Pen for Surface 3 -
001.000.31.518.88.31.00
Newegg.com - ASUS VE228H 21.5" f
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
Symantec - File Share Encryption 1 y
001.000.31.518.88.41.00
5593 RECORDING FEES
SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC
4.4.a
Page: 37
c
ca
lid
U
W
Amoun };
0
a
a)
1,215.8E
a)
L
91.6z =a
4-
117.8z
m
139.7(
c�
2,987.0( 0
L
1,243.9< a
E
43.3< 'ca
U
29.9E 0
53.0E o
a
Q.
106.0( Q
r
45.8E
240.9,1 t°
ao
576.4(
0
N
122.0(
M
122.0( u
Page: 37
Packet Pg. 68
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221453 8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
5923
PAPER, OFFICESPACE ONLINE LIS
Paper for Edmonds business surveys
001.000.61.558.70.31.00
Reservation for Economic Alliance
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
Registration for VisitSeattle.org
001.000.61.558.70.49.00
Monthly business property database
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
Registration for Patrick Doherty to
001.000.61.557.20.49.00
7081
WFOA TRAINING FOR D TURLEY
WFOA - CAFR Training Advanced Gc
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
7476
INV#7476 08/08/16 - BARD - EDMOI`
STREAMLIGHT FLASHLIGHTS
001.000.41.521.40.35.00
TLO SEARCHES 7/2016
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
7483
MAYOR'S MONTHLY LUNCHEON MI
July Mayor's luncheon meeting
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
August Mayor's luncheon meeting
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
8296
WFOA CONFERENCE FOR S JAME
WFOA 2016 Annual Conference
001.000.31.514.20.49.00
8304
US BANK VISA BILL
BAREFOOT STUDENT - MEMBERS[
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
CL JOB POSTING ASS GYM/YOUTH
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
CL JOB POSTING PARKS BEAUTIFI
4.4.a
Page: 38
c
ca
lid
U
W
Amoun };
0
a
17.0( -0)
U
a�
L
26.3(
4-
35.0( c
m
60.0(
c�
100.0( o
L
275.0( a
E
300.0(
w
0
251.4z o
a
Q.
26.2: Q
r
to
13.0(
m
r
14.0( ao
r
06
0
325.0( Y
U
E
100.0(
45.0( a0i
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 38
Packet Pg. 69
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221453 8/18/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
8304
9821
221454 8/18/2016 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 6070126
PO # Description/Account
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
CL JOB POSTING REC LEADER - G
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
CL JOB POSTING GYM INST.
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
CL JOB POSTING PARKS LABOREF
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
NEOGOV CONFERENCE - YVONNE
001.000.22.518.10.49.00
BAREFOOT STUDENT MEMBERSHI
BAREFOOT STUDENT - MEMBERS[
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
INV#9821 08/08/16 - GREENMUN - E
BIANCHI RADIO HOLDER
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
OTTERBOX IPHONE CASE
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
SHIPPING TRAINING SUPPLIES
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
REG-MEHL/INVEST OFFICER SHOC
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
REG-SCHEELE/PROP ROOM MGT
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
BOOK -UNDERSTAND POLICE KILLI
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
USB CABLES FOR PATROL CARS
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
Total
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
4.4.a
Page: 39
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
CL
45.0( -0)
45.0( aa)
L
=a
90.0( 4-
W
c
90.0( M
825.0( m
0
L
-50.0( a
E
to
35.1, w
0
25.1 '
0
L
13.5( a
Q
299.0( r
0
375.0(
m
r
25.5 0
r
ao
34.7E o
23,642.9' Y
U
E
89.4(
c
m
89.4( E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 39
Packet Pg. 70
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
221454 8/18/2016 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR (Continued)
PO # Description/Account
4.4.a
Page: 40
lid
ca
U
w
U
_ Amoun };
0
0-
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
92.1(
Total:
270.9( L
221455
8/18/2016 075720 VAN TASSELL, KATRINA
BID-073016
PRODUCTION & EDITING OF VIDE
=a
=
Production & editing of video clips to
4-
c
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
300.0(
Total :
300.0(
c
221456
8/18/2016 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC
986
FALL SUMMIT CORT
f°
FALL SUMMIT CORT
0 L
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
149.0( ca
Total:
149.0(
E
221457
8/18/2016 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE
201126915
INV 201126915 EDMONDS PD - MEI-
HANDGUN INSTRUCTOR 1 - MEHL
,-
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
750.0( c
Total:
750.0( >
0
L
221458
8/18/2016 075155 WALKER MACY LLC
P3282.01-3
CIVIC FIELD MASTER PLAN
0-
Q.
CIVIC FIELD MASTER PLAN
Q
125.000.64.576.80.41.00
r
14,636.7�to
Total :
14,636.7t
221459
8/18/2016 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
87428
WATER - WORK JEANS (5) P ROCH
m
Water - Work Jeans (5) P Rochford
o
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
193.4E r
9.5% Sales Tax
c
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
18.3E Y
TR-299652
FAC MAINT - WORK JEANS (4) - J R
Fac Maint - Work Jeans (4) - J Rolfe
E
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
170.9(
9.2% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
15.7:
TR-300377
FAC MAINT - WORK JEANS - D HOL
E
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 40
Packet Pg. 71
vchlist
08/17/2016 9:03:24AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
221459 8/18/2016 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
4.4.a
Page: 41
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
r a)
238.4z
a�
L
21.9z =a
Total : 658.9(
aD
221460 8/18/2016 073079 ZONES INC K04093410101 INV#K04093410101 CUST#0058931' m
PENTEX PERFORATED PAPER ROL
001.000.41.521.11.31.00 951.2(
9.8% Sales Tax
0
001.000.41.521.11.31.00 93.2, L
110 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
110 Vouchers in this report
Fac Maint - Work Jeans - D Housle
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
9.2% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
Tota
Bank tota
Total voucher
1: 1,044.4; a
1 : 634,145.51 .E
s : 634,145.51 c
Page: 41
Packet Pg. 72
r
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
ui
Accounting
Project
41
a�
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
E
STM
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
c484
E5FE
Q
STR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
3
SWR
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
c390
E2GB
c
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c398
E3GA
STR
2014 Chip Seals
c451
E4CB
rn
a�
STM
2014 Drainage Improvements
c433
E4FA
STM
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
N
STR
2014 Overlay Program
c438
E4CA
WTR
2014 Waterline Overlays
c452
E4CC
v
STM
2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E41FC
L
STM
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
c466
E5FA
STR
2015 Overlay Program
c463
E5CA
m
SWR
2015 Sewerline Overlays
i007
E5CC
SWR
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
c441
E4GA
STR
2015 Traffic Calming
c471
E5AB
p
L
WTR
2015 Waterline Overlays
c475
E5CB
WTR
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
c440
E4J13
STR
2016 Overlay Program
i008
E6CA
v
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c469
E5GA
o
SWR
2016 Sewerline Overlays
i010
E6CC
WTR
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
c460
E4JC
WTR
2016 Waterline Overlays
i009
E6CB
Q
WTR
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
c468
E5JA
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
i013
E6GA
co
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6J13
m
STR
220th Street Overlay Project
c462
E4CD
r
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
c
WTR
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
c418
E3J13
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
m
E
STR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
Z
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
o
a
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
y
STM
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
i012
E6FC
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
r
STR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
c392
E2AB
s
m
FAC
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
c476
E5LA
Li
STR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
a�
STR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
E
t
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
PRK
City Spray Park
c417
E4MA
r
Q
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c456
E4GB
Revised 8/16/2016
Packet Pg. 73
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Protect Engineering
Accounting Project
Number Number
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB
WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 74
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
ElFM
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c472
E5FC
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
General
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
c478
E5DB
FAC
ESCO III Project
c419
E3LB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E51KA
STIR
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
E8MA
STIR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
sol l
E5GB
STM
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
c434
E4FB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E2FA
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
i011
E6FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E3FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
c376
E1 FN
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
FAC
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
c444
E4LA
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
E5FD
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
STIR
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
c427
E3AB
STIR
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
c454
E4DB
STIR
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
s014
E6AA
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
STM
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
c429
E3FG
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
SW Edmonds-105th/l06th Ave W Storm Improvements
c430
E3FH
STIR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
STIR
Train Trench - Concept
c453
E4DA
STIR
Transportation Plan Update
c391
E2AA
STM
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
c467
E5FB
UTILITIES
Utility Rate Update
s013
E6JA
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
STM
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
c459
E4FF
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
E5HA
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 75
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
STR
E1AA
c342
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR 368
ve W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E1DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STM
yton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM
E1 FN
c376
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STR
ransportation Plan Updat
STR
E2AB
c392
9th Avenue Improvement Project
STR
E2AD
NE1Wy
99 Enhancements (Phase
STM
E2FA
c378
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW t an Park Infiltration System
STM
E2FC
c380
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR
0
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STR
E3AB
c427
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR
E3DC
c424
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR
E3
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR
E3DE
c426
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STM
E3FC
c408
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM
E3FE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
STM
E3FG
c429
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM
E3FH
c430
SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements
SWR
E3GA
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Pr '
WTR
E3J13
c418
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC
E3LB
c419
ESCO III Proje INV
STR
E4CA
c438
2014 Overlay Program
STR
E4CB
c451
2014 Chip Seals
WTR
E4CC
c452
2014 Waterline Overlays
STR
E4CD
c462
220th Street Overlay Project
STR
E4DA
c453
Train Trench - Concept
STR
E4DB
c454
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
STM
E4FA
c433
2014 Drainage Improvements
STM
c434
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM
E4FC
c435
2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
NET
c436
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
`STM
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
SWR
E4GA
c441
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
`,SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
T
to
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 76
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Project
Proiect
Accounting
N
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
E
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
WTR
E4JB
c440
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR
E4JC
c460
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
FAC
E4LA
c444
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
PRK
E4MA
c417
City Spray Park
c�
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c�
STIR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
+;
STIR
E5AB
c471
2015 Traffic Calming
p
STIR
E5CA
c463
2015 Overlay Program
WTR
E5CB
c475
2015 Waterline Overlays
v
m
SWR
E5CC
i007
2015 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
d
General
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
m
STM
E51FA
c466
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
C
STM
E5FB
c467
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
cc
STM
E5FC
c472
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
A
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
Q.
STM
E51FE
c484
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
SWR
E5GA
c469
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c�
SWR
E5GB
s011
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5JA
c468
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
Q
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
Q'
Q
WTR
E5KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
co
FAC
E5LA
c476
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
STIR
E6AA
s014
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
STIR
E6CA
i008
2016 Overlay Program
r
0
WTR
E6CB
i009
2016 Waterline Overlays
N
L
SWR
E6CC
i010
2016 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
Z
STIR
E6DB
s016
ADA Transition Plan
L
STM
E61FA
i011
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
IL
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
STM
E6FC
i012
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
SWR
E6GA
i013
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
r
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
m
L
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
u_
WTR
E6J13
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
N
PRK
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
E
STIRE7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
r
Q
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PM
E7MA
c276
Dayton Street Plaza
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 77
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Project
Proiect
Accounting
Funding Number
Number Proiect Title
PM EBMA
c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 78
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Proiect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Proiect Title
PM
E7MA
c276
Dayton Street Plaza
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E1AA
c342
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STM
E1 FM
c374
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM
E1 FN
c376
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM
E21FA
c378
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM
E2FB
c379
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM
E2FC
c380
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR
E2GB
c390
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STIR
E2AA
c391
Transportation Plan Update
STIR
E2AB
c392
9th Avenue Improvement Project
SWR
E3GA
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
STIR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM
E3FC
c408
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM
E31FE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
PRK
E4MA
c417
City Spray Park
WTR
E3J13
c418
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC
E3LB
c419
ESCO III Project
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STIR
E3DC
c424
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STIR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STIR
E3DE
c426
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STIR
E3AB
c427
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STM
E3FG
c429
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM
E3FH
c430
SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM
E41FA
c433
2014 Drainage Improvements
STM
E4FB
c434
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM
E4FC
c435
2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STIR
E4CA
c438
2014 Overlay Program
WTR
E4J13
c440
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR
E4GA
c441
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
FAC
E41-A
c444
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STIR
E4CB
c451
2014 Chip Seals
WTR
E4CC
c452
2014 Waterline Overlays
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 79
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
N
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
j_
STR
E4DA
c453
Train Trench - Concept
STR
E4DB
c454
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GB
c456
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
STM
E4FF
c459
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
c�
WTR
E4JC
c460
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
c�
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
+;
STR
E4CD
c462
220th Street Overlay Project
p
STR
E5CA
c463
2015 Overlay Program
STM
E51FA
c466
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
v
m
STM
E5FB
c467
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
WTR
E5JA
c468
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
d
SWR
E5GA
c469
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
m
STR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
C
STR
E5AB
c471
2015 Traffic Calming
cc
STM
E5FC
c472
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
A
WTR
E51KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
Q.
STR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
WTR
E5CB
c475
2015 Waterline Overlays
c�
FAC
E5LA
c476
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
General
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
Q
PRK
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
Q'
Q
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
co
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STM
E5FE
c484
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
STR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
r
0
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase IICD
N
L
STR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
SWR
E5CC
i007
2015 Sewerline Overlays
Z
STR
E6CA
i008
2016 Overlay Program
L
WTR
E6CB
i009
2016 Waterline Overlays
IL
SWR
E6CC
i010
2016 Sewerline Overlays
t°n
STM
E61FA
iol 1
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM
E6FC
i012
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
r
SWR
E6GA
i013
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
s
d
L
WTR
E6J13
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
u_
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
N
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
E
SWR
E5GB
s011
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
t
r
Q
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
STR
E6AA
s014
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 80
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Proiect
Accounting
Funding Number
Number Proiect Title
STIR E6DB
s016 ADA Transition Plan
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 81
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Protect
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
FAC
A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
c476
E5LA
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
ESCO III Project
c419
E3LB
FAC
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
c444
E41-A
General
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
c478
E5DB
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
E8MA
PRK
City Spray Park
c417
E4MA
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
STM
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
c484
E5FE
STM
2014 Drainage Improvements
c433
E4FA
STM
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STM
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
c466
E5FA
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
STM
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
i012
E6FC
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
E1 FM
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c472
E5FC
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
STM
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
c434
E4FB
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E2FA
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
i011
E6FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E3FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
c376
E1 FN
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
E5FD
STM
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
c429
E3FG
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
c430
E3FH
STM
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
c467
E5FB
STM
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
c459
E4FF
STR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
STR
2014 Chip Seals
c451
E4CB
STR
2014 Overlay Program
c438
E4CA
STR
2015 Overlay Program
c463
E5CA
STR
2015 Traffic Calming
c471
E5AB
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 82
4.4.b
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Protect
Fundinq
Protect Title
Number
Number
STR
2016 Overlay Program
i008
E6CA
STR
220th Street Overlay Project
c462
E4CD
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
STR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
c392
E2AB
STR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
STR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
STR
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
STR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
STR
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
c427
E3AB
STR
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
c454
E4DB
STR
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
s014
E6AA
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
STR
Train Trench - Concept
c453
E4DA
STR
Transportation Plan Update
c391
E2AA
SWR
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehablitation
c390
E2GB
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c398
E3GA
SWR
2015 Sewerline Overlays
i007
E5CC
SWR
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
c441
E4GA
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c469
E5GA
SWR
2016 Sewerline Overlays
iolo
E6CC
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
i013
E6GA
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c456
E4GB
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
sol l
E5GB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
UTILITIES
Utility Rate Update
s013
E6JA
WTR
2014 Waterline Overlays
c452
E4CC
WTR
2015 Waterline Overlays
c475
E5CB
WTR
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
c440
E4JB
WTR
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
c460
E4JC
WTR
2016 Waterline Overlays
io09
E6CB
WTR
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
c468
E5JA
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6JB
WTR
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
c418
E3JB
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
E5JB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E5KA
Revised 8/16/2016 Packet Pg. 83
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
4.4.b
Funding Project Title
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
Project Engineering
Accounting Project
Number Number
c446 E4HA
c481 E5HA
Revised 8/16/2016
Packet Pg. 84
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 781 (08/01/2016 to 08/15/2016)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
-ed2
REGULAR HOURS
Educational Pay Correction
0.00
-156.28
111
ABSENT
NO PAY LEAVE
40.00
0.00
112
ABSENT
NO PAY NON HIRED
16.00
0.00
118
ABSENT
UNPAID L & 1
13.00
0.00
120
SICK
SICK LEAVE - L & 1
28.00
629.54
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
335.42
12,028.77
122
VACATION
VACATION
1,914.75
70,559.80
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
10.00
454.65
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
28.00
870.57
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
219.75
8,175.86
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
144.00
5,137.49
130
COMP HOURS
Holiday Compensation Used
39.00
1,442.75
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
40.00
1,673.64
141
BEREAVEMENT
BEREAVEMENT
61.00
2,521.20
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Day Used
188.00
6,823.35
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
61.53
2,773.59
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
1.00
65.67
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
16,806.65
593,198.55
193
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
4.50
101.18
205
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME .5
112.50
1,972.31
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
7.50
234.25
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
48.00
2,258.25
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
13.00
1,301.70
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
493.75
32,146.05
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
3.50
207.93
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
111.53
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,031.11
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
1,280.20
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP
59.50
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME
122.50
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME
4.50
0.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
24.95
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
143.91
boc
MISCELLANEOUS
BOC II Certification
0.00
84.53
08/17/2016 Packet Pg. 85
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 781 (08/01/2016 to 08/15/2016)
4.4.c
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstructionist
0.00
107.89
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
147.28
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
622.35
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
75.00
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
102.75
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
989.84
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
731.26
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
891.06
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
5,117.28
fmla
ABSENT
FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID
48.00
0.00
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
102.75
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
888.29
Ig10
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY 5.5%
0.00
396.36
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
737.53
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
997.22
Iq3
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY 6%
0.00
5,661.69
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
240.75
Iq6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
274.08
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1.5%
0.00
931.11
Iq9
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3.5%
0.00
82.46
mels
SICK
Medical Leave Sick
40.00
1,630.91
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
200.57
pds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
47.12
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
1,923.49
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER
0.00
157.56
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%
0.00
514.51
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
157.56
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
323.67
20,903.35 $771,149.39
Total Net Pay: $513,710.39
08/17/2016 Packet Pg. 86
4.4.d
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 781 - 08/01/2016 to 08/15/2016
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
62296
08/19/2016
chap1
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
50.00
62297
08/19/2016
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
2,925.00
62298
08/19/2016
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
388.00
62299
08/19/2016
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
789.99
62300
08/19/2016
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
5,111.30
62301
08/19/2016
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
2,149.81
11,414.10
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
2432
08/19/2016
awc
AWC
321,036.93
2435
08/19/2016
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
19,766.00
2436
08/19/2016
us
US BANK
109,040.15
2437
08/19/2016
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N3177131
94,624.55
2440
08/19/2016
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
5,715.92
2441
08/19/2016
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
158.00
2442
08/19/2016
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
673.50
551,015.05
Grand Totals: 562,429.15
8/ 17/2016
.r
.y
O
Direct Deposit
0.00
0.00
i
0.00
0.00
0.00
c
0.00
c
0.00
0
L
Q
Direct Deposit
E
M
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
L
a
0.00
Q
0.00
m
0.00
v
co
0.00
a6
0
0
a
c
m
0
L
Q
d
E
t
V
a
Q
Packet Pg. 87
5.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Economic Development Commission Presentation (20 min.)
Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty
Department: Economic Development
Preparer: Patrick Doherty
Background/History
From June of 2009 through December 2015 a 17-member Citizens Economic Development Commission
served Edmonds, pursuant to Edmonds City Code Chapter 10.75. The code provisions enabling that
commission expired at the end of 2015, and on February 2, 2016 a new nine -member Citizens Economic
Development Commission was established pursuant to City Council -approved amendments to Chapter
10.75.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Since its creation this past Spring the new Economic Development Commission has met monthly to
identify key priorities for its continuing work in the short-term and long-term. Jamie Reece, Chair of the
Commission, will be presenting a brief PowerPoint presentation that will share the Commission's work
to date, with a particular emphasis on their work program priorities for the rest of this year and beyond
into 2017.
Packet Pg. 88
5.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Edmonds School District Foundation Presentation on Youth Homelessness (15 min.)
Staff Lead: Andrew Pierce
Department: City Council
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
ESD Foundation Director Anderson will provide information to the City Council on youth homelessness.
Packet Pg. 89
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals (60 min.)
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
December 20, 2011. An amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan, which includes the Sunset Ave.
Walkway is passed.
April 17, 2012. A Resolution of the Council in support of pursuing an RCO grant for the design of City
Park and the Sunset Overlook projects is passed.
June 4, 2013. A Resolution of the City Council in strong support of a 2013 Transportation Investment
Package, including the Sunset Avenue Walkway is passed.
December 3, 2013. Public Comment and discussion of the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project.
March 4, 2014. Discussion and potential action regarding modifying or terminating the Sunset Walkway
Project.
March 25, 2014. Public comment and continued discussion of the Sunset Avenue Project.
April 1, 2014. A continuation of discussion concerning the project.
June 24, 2014. The City's Transportation Improvement Plan, including the Sunset Avenue Walkway
Project passes.
July 16, 2014. A motion to amend the Transportation Improvement Plan to remove the Sunset Avenue
Walkway Project was defeated.
August 19, 2014. A proposal to restripe Sunset Avenue to emulate what the project may look like as a
proof -of -concept was approved.
May 5, 2015. An update to the status of the proof -of -concept was presented.
August 25, 2015. A presentation of traffic and pedestrian data was presented.
December 8, 2015. A motion to strip the term 'multiuse' and replace it with the term 'walkway' in
describing the project was approved.
February 9, 2016. A presentation of the public survey results was presented to the Council.
Packet Pg. 90
7.1
May 24, 2016. Several design concepts were presented, and Public Works was asked to bring a proposal
at a later Council meeting so that staff could move forward with design.
Staff Recommendation
That Council authorize Public Works to re -start design activities regarding the Sunset Avenue Walkway,
which will be incorporated into future utility projects, and until those projects are complete, allow
interim improvements to address current concerns with parking, pedestrian safety, and wrong -way
motorists.
Narrative
This presentation will provide an overall proposed design effort, along with several
concepts for low-cost interim improvements to the current configuration.
Over the last approximately two years there has been a growing awareness that any
construction of the Sunset Avenue Walkway will need to be sequenced behind several
significant upgrades to City utilities. These utility projects will impact significant portions
of the street surface. This will result in the replacement of a large percentage of the
existing roadway. Furthermore, the design, funding, and construction of the
underground utilities are likely to push walkway construction further into the future,
perhaps by several years. Staff is asking for authorization to continue the design of the
walkway project so these utility projects can be designed with a clear picture of how the
street level improvements are expected to look. In that way the surface restoration
required after completing utility upgrades can be done in a way to reduce duplication
and lower the cost of the future surface improvements. Examples of some
recommended design features that could be done as part of utility upgrading include
the design of the Sunset Overlook, the table -top intersection at Edmonds Street, in
addition to other required surface fixtures, landscaping, and amenities.
If construction of a "permanent" project is not imminent it leaves the question of how
to address the current "temporary"configuration. The pilot project that re -striped
Sunset Avenue to include the walkway was completed and fully opened for public use
on September 18th of 2014. Several field adjustments were made to the walkway
application as it was installed, and subsequent, targeted adjustments to particular areas
have also been made as needed when issues have been identified.
There are, however, several items that would benefit from additional interim solutions
while we wait for the permanent project to be built. These include improvements at the
angled parking area, a method for discouraging wrong -way traffic on the road, and
installing a physical separator between the walkway and the roadway, and other
improvements that will be discussed in the presentation. There are also some very -low
cost improvements that should be considered, such as reducing parking times and
adding some additional parallel parking.
It is hoped that Council will give staff clear direction on the interim improvements being
recommended as well as the clear authority to continue with the design of the
permanent project which has been in suspension for approximately two years.
Attachments:
Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW
Packet Pg. 91
4
(.n
rb
o
r-�-
o
C
�^
r0
rb
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
7.1.a
!4R
JAM
Sunset Avenue Walkway
Design Proposals
--Continue with overall Project Design
Packet Pg. 93
7.1.a
31,1'' ii I r AMMVR
JAM
AV
Sunset Avenue Walkway
Design Proposals
--Continue with overall Project Design
--Incorporate Project Design into coming Utilities PrcjE
Packet Pg. 94
7.1.a
31,1'' ii I r AMMVR
JAM
AV
Sunset Avenue Walkway
Design Proposals
--Continue with overall Project Design
--Incorporate Project Design into upcoming Utilities Projects
--Apply low-cost interim solutions to address issues with
current configuration
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
7.1.a
Overlook —Concept Design, 2020s Construction
LAM
�T
Packet Pg. 97
0
' .
n
O10
.i
rTl
Ln
1
I
I
rb
• •
ro
�.
- ON
V
3
a1
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
rn�'
` V
ftftft ,
�r
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
ro
ro
ro
ro
4k
j 'A_
.t3
Q
ro
W
Ln
Z3 <
rb
Ln rb
vi
mkR
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
� r
W !N k4
�yzNJ
�-r3
C ~1
� O
M Ln
tn
Q
�.: to
� o �
o � a
�.,•, • N O
N Oo
i Ll
w fb
w�- s rb v1
`(:
f
P
P.jm
O.
L-11
0
X
M
rt
(Q
0
00
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
V
3
a1
M
O
CD3
CD
�
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
Decisions Needed
Final Design Issues:
• Should the final design move the
3-5 feet further west and change
approximately 5 deg.?
— Staff recommendation -yes
angled parking area
the angle used by
• Should s
table-top
intersection be
added at Edmonds
Street
to
calm
traffic
and
improve
pedestrian
safety?
— Staff recommendation - yes
• Should the numb
reduced from the
13 as discussed?
!r of angle parking spaces be
current 21 spaces to either 15 or to
— Staff recommendation —13
�a
U)
0
0.
0
a`
a�
y
as
0
a
y
_
3
LO
CL
N
W
H
LL
CD
r
M
N
00
O
_
0
CU
CL
fC
w
w
Q
Packet Pg. 110
Decisions Needed
Final Design Issues (cont.)
• Should the width of the walkway be maintained
at the current 8 feet or narrowed to 6 feet or 5
feet?
— Staff recommendation - no
• Should a modified c-curb be installed along the
edge of the walkway where possible to better
separate automobile traffic from pedestrian
traffic?
— Staff recommendation - yes
Packet Pg. 111
Decisions Needed
Final Design Issues (cont.)
• Should 7-9 additional parallel parking spaces be
added to Sunset where driveway issues don't
exist or where they can be mitigated?
— Staff recommendation —yes
• Should the Sunset Avenue Overlook and an
extension of the walkway on Gaspers Street be
designed as part of the project with continued
and frequent public involvement?
— Staff recommendation -yes
LO
r
d
N
H
LL
CD
0
r
M
N
00
O
_
O
r
CU
CL
Packet Pg. 112
7.1.a
Decisions Needed
Final Design Issues (cont.)
1-1
Should appropriate signage and and changes
in raised islands be made on Gaspers to
further discourage and/or
driving on Sunset?
— Staff recommendation —yes
prevent wrong way
Should parking restrictions on Sunset be
changed from 4-hours to 3-hours or 2-hours?
— Staff recommendation — 3-hours
N
a
0
M
N
W
O
a
E
a
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
Decisions Needed
Interim Improvement Design Issues:
1-1
Should appropriate signage and and changes
d
in raised islands be made on Gaspers to
further discourage and/or
driving on Sunset?
— Staff recommendation —yes
prevent wrong way
Should parking restrictions on Sunset be
N
U_
CD
0
M
All
N
O
_
0
changed from 4-hours to 3-hours or 2-hours?
E
U
fC
w
w
Q
— Staff recommendation — 3-hours
Packet Pg. 115
Decisions Needed
Interim Improvement Design Issues:
Should the final design move the angled
�a
U)
0
0.
0
a`
a�
y
as
0
3
Q
y
_
3
parking area 3-5 feet further west and changeLO
the angle used by approximately 5 deg.?
a
— Staff recommendation —yes Q
0
Should the number of angle parking spaces b
CD
reduced from the current 21 spaces to either
15 or to 13 as discussed? a
d
— Staff recommendation —13
Packet Pg. 116
Decisions Needed
Interim Improvement Design Issues:
• Should a modified c-curb be installed along the
edge of the walkway where possible to better
separate automobile traffic from pedestrian
traffic?
— Staff recommendation - yes
• Should 7-9 additional parallel parking spaces be
added to Sunset where driveway issues don't
exist or where they can be mitigated?
— Staff recommendation —yes
LO
r
CL
N
W
H
LL
to
0
r
M
N
00
O
_
O
r
E
w
Q
Packet Pg. 117
Decisions Needed
Interim Improvement Design Issues:
1-1
Should appropriate signage and and changes
d
in raised islands be made on Gaspers to
further discourage and/or
driving on Sunset?
— Staff recommendation —yes
prevent wrong way
Should parking restrictions on Sunset be
N
U_
CD
0
M
All
N
O
_
0
changed from 4-hours to 3-hours or 2-hours?
E
U
fC
w
w
Q
— Staff recommendation — 3-hours
Packet Pg. 118
Decisions Needed
• Should a decision package be submitted to make inte
improvements as discussed?
rp
&a
Packet Pg. 119
ICJ
Attachment: Sunset Presentation 082316 DRAFT R2 PHW (1459 : Sunset Ave Walkway Design Proposals)
7.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Presentation of the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (15 min.)
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On May 24, 2016, staff presented the draft 2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program to Council.
On June 7, 2016, a Public Hearing was held on the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program
Staff Recommendation
Place the Resolution on the consent agenda for the City Council meeting on September 6, 2017.
Narrative
The Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a transportation planning document that
identifies funded, partially funded, and unfunded projects that are planned or needed over the next six
calendar years. The TIP also identifies the expenditures and secured or reasonably expected revenues
for each of the projects included in the TIP. The City practice in preparing the TIP each year has been to
keep it financially constrained the first 3 years (2017-2019), but not the last 3 years (2020-2022).
RCW 35.77.010 and 36.81.121 require that each city update and adopt their TIP prior to adoption of the
budget. A copy of the adopted TIP will be submitted to the Puget Sound Regional Council, Washington
State Department of Transportation, and adjacent jurisdictions after it has been approved by City
Council.
Some of the projects in the TIP are shown as funded through secured or unsecured Federal / State
grants, as well as from the local funds. Due to a shortfall in transportation funding, a number of
unsecured State and Federal transportation grants have been programmed to fund projects beginning in
2020. Most transportation grants are competitive, and the success of how many grants are secured in
the future will depend on other transportation needs and funding requests in the region. Projects not
identified in this document may not be eligible for Federal / State funding. All projects in the
2017-2022 TIP are identified in the 2015 Transportation Plan. Since the June 7t", 2016 Public Hearing,
the following projects have been added / modified to the document:
The funding source for the 84t" Ave. W Overlay from 220t" St. SW to 212" St. SW has been
modified from "unsecured" to "Federal secured", since a grant will be awarded later this
year.
Packet Pg. 121
7.2
The funding amount identified for the Hwy 99 Safety Improvements from 224t" St. SW to
220t" St. SW in 2017 has been increased from $10,000 to $300,000 since additional
improvements need to be completed (Federal grant recently submitted).
The 220t" St. SW Coordination project from Hwy. 99 to 76t" Ave. W has been added (grant
recently submitted).
95t" Pl. W Walkway from 224t" St. SW to 220t" St. SW has been added (grant recently
submitted).
15t" St. SW Walkway from 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S has been added in 2017 (Minor Sidewalk
Program).
The funding for the Minor Sidewalk Program is eliminated in 2017, since staff is proposing to
fund the 151h St. SW Walkway project from 81h Ave. S to 91h Ave. S.
Attachments:
Resolution for TIP
2017-22 6-yrTIP Version
Packet Pg. 122
7.2.a
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2017-2022
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND
DIRECTING FILING OF THE ADOPTED PROGRAM WITH
THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 and 36.81.121 require that each city and town is
required to adopt a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and file a copy of such adopted
program with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT); and
WHEREAS, the TIP identifies all planned projects over the next 6 years, along
with the appropriate funding source; now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Transportation Improvement Program is hereby adopted pursuant
to the requirements of RCW 35.77.010 and 36.81.121 to be effective on September 71h, 2016 and
to continue in full force and effect until amended. A copy of such Transportation Improvement
Program for the years 2017 to 2022 is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this
reference as fully as if herein set forth.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby requested and directed to file a certified copy
of the Transportation Improvement Program with the Washington State Department of
Transportation.
-1-
Packet Pg. 123
7.2.a
RESOLVED this day of 32016.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, DAVE O. EARLING
-2-
Packet Pg. 124
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
Grant Opportunity
Proj
Phasect es)
(2017-2022)
Total Cost
Source(s)
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
New projects not included in 2016-2021 TIP
Secured rant since 2016-2021 TIP
Recently submitted gmnt
Preservation/Maintenance Projects:
Annual Street Preservation
Grind pavement, overlay, chip seal,
Possible Grant
Engineering
$1,900,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$900,000
$1,000,000
Program
&
&
$0
(State)
and slurry seal
Local Funds
Construction
$10,976,000
Local, General Fund
$1,190,000
$1,420,000
$2,000,000
$2,060,000
$2,120,000
$2,186,000
84th Ave. W Oveday from
220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
Grind pavement and overlay Or
Possible Grant
&
Engineering
&
$750,000
$0
(Federal, secured)
(State)
$750,000
Local Funds
Construction
$190,000
Local, General Fund
$190,000
Citywide Signal
Upgrade traffic signal cabinets and
Possible Grant
Engineering
$650,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$325,000
$325,000
Improvements
&
&
$0
(State)
improve technology
Local Funds
Construction
$0
Local
Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades
Possible grant
Engineering
$287,500
(Federal, unsecured)
$37,500
$250,000
Upgrade traffic signal
&
&
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$212,500
Local
$37.500
1 $175,000
238th @ 100th Ave. Signal Upgrades
Rebuild traffic signal system
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
with new signal mast arms, cabinet, and
Possible Grant
&
$765,000
(State, unsecured)
$765,000
video detection
Construction
$0
Local
Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades
Possible grant
Engineering
$287,500
(Federal, unsecured)
$37,500
$250,000
Upgrade traffic signal
&
&
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$87,500
Local
$37,500
$50,000
TOTAL
$2,130,000
$1,420,000
$2,900,000
$3,225,000
$3,945,000
$2,486,000
Safety Capacity Projects:
228th St. SW. Corridor Safety
Construct missing roadway link on 228th St. SW between
Secured grant
$10,000
(Federal, secured)
$10,000
Improvements
Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W, with various utility upgrades.
&
Construction
$0
(State)
Local Funds
$0
Local
228th St. SW. from
Widen roadway to add two-way left turn lane along stretch or
Possibe grant
$50,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$50,000
Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W
left turn lanes at specific intersections.
&
Design
$0
(State)
Install sidewalk and bike lanes.
Local Funds
$50,000
Local
$50,000
76th Av. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection
Re -design intersection to reduce intersection delay and
$3,006,500
(Federal, secured)
$2,920,000
$86,500
$1,930,827
(State, unsecured)
$1,930,827
$113,500
Improvements
improve level of service (LOS). Various utility
Secured Grant
(Local, Traffic Impact Fees)
$100,000
$13,500
improvements are also included in the project.
&
Construction
$776,475
(Local, Fund 421)
$776,475
$450,528
Local Funds
(Local, Fund 422)
$450,528
$718,685
Loral, Fund 423
$718,685
Hwy. 99 Safety Improvements
Install C-Curb along this section of Hwy. 99 to restrict left turns into
Local Funds /
Design,
$4,012,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$300,000
$700,000
$474,000
$2,538,000
from 216th St. SW to 224th St. SW
driveway from the two-way left turn lane and add left turn pockets
Possible Grant
ROW, &
$0
(State, secured)
in certain areas.
Construction
$282,000
Local, General Funds
$282,000
SR-99 Gateway / Revitalization
Install gateway elements and safety improvements
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
along the SR-99 Corridor.
Grant secured
&
$5,000,000
(State, secured)
$500,000
$4,500,000
Construction
$0
Local
SR 524 (196th St. SW) @
Design intersection improvements and addition of guardrail on
Design
$0
(Federal)
881h Ave W. Intersection
the west side of intersection due to 12' vertical drop (grade.
Possible Grant
$122,000
(State, unsecured)
$122,000
$71,000
Improvements
adjustment to improve sight distance to be considered).
Local, traffic impact fees
$71,000
ROW acquisition
ROW
$0
(Federal)
&
$87,500
(State, unsecured)
$87,500
$87,500
Local
$87:500
Complete intersection improvements
Construction
$585,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$585,000
Local Funds
$0
(State)
$0
Local
Main St. @ 9th Ave.
Installation of traffic signal or mini -roundabout.
Possible grant
Engineering
$788,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$118,000
$670,000
&
&
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$123,000
Local
$18,000
1 $105,000
76th Av. W @ 220th St. SW
Installation of new traffic signal to convert existing split phasing for
Possible Grant
Engineering,
$5,186,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$951,500
$951,500
$3,283,000
Intersection Improvements
eastbound and westbound movements to concurrent lef turn phasing
&
ROW, &
$0
(State)
with addition of right turn lane for the southbound movement.
Local Funds
Construction
$809,000
Local
$148,500
$148,500
$512,000
220th St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination
Coordinate the traffic signals along 76th Ave. W
Engineering
$300,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$300,000
from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W to
Possible Grants
&
$0
(State)
improve corridor efficiencies through adaptive system.
Construction
$0
Local
Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW
Widen 212th St. SW to add a WB and EB left turn lane.
Possible Grants
Engineering,
$2,427,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$152,000
$943,000
$1,332,000
Intersection Improvements
Provide protected / permissive left turn phasing for both
&
ROW, &
$0
(State)
movements shared jurisdiction with Cityof Lynnwood)
Local Funds
Construction
$379,000
Local w/ _It,
i of Lynnwood)
$23,000
$148,000
$208,000
V
Page 1 N
Attachment: 2017-22 6-yrTIP Version (1458 : 2017-2022 TIP - Presentation)
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2017-2022)
Grant Opportunity
Project
(2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
Phase(s)
Total Cost
Source(s)
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW
Widen 216th St. SW to add a WB and EB left turn lane.
Possible Grants
Engineering,
$2,021,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$142,000
$289,000
$1,590,000
Intersection Improvements
Provide protected / permissive left turn phasing for both
&
ROW, &
$0
(State)
movements.
Local Funds
Construction
$314,000
Local, w/ City of Lynnwood)
$22,000
$45,000
$247,000
Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW
Widen 220th St .SW to add westbound right turn lane and
Possible Grants
Engineering,
$2,783,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$152,000
$939,000
$1,692,000
Intersection Improvements
Hwy. 99 to add 2nd southbound left turn lane.
&
ROW, &
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$432,000
Local, w/. City Mountlake Terrace)
1 $23,000
$146,000
1 $263,000
SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / 15th St. SW
Extend SR-104 Westbound left turn lane and complete pedestrian
Possible Grants
Engineering,
$179,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$15,000
$164,000
Intersection Improvements
and bicycle improvements with signage and traffic signal
&
&
$0
(State)
improvements.
Local Funds
Construction
$15,000
Local
$15,000
SR-104 @ 95th PI. W
Modify existing signal timing to include protected left turn phasing
Possible Grants
Engineering,
$420,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$65,000
$355,000
Intersection Improvements
and provide C-Curb with left turn channeli-tion
&
&
$0
(State)
for access management.
Local Funds
Construction
$75,000
Local
$10,000
$65,000
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW
Install traffic signal and other
Possible Grants
Engineering,
$1,157,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$173,000
$984,000
Intersection Improvements
improvement intersections.
&
ROW, &
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$181,000
Local
$27,000
$154,000
Type 2 Raised Pavement
Install Type 2 Raised Pavement Markers
Engineering
$100,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$100,000
Markers
along the centerline of arterials and collectors, improving
Possible Grant
&
$0
(State)
roadway safety during night hours and on rainy days
Construction
$0
Local
Trackside Warning Systerm
Install Wayside Homs
$0
(Federal)
at Dayton St. and Main St.
at (2) railroad crossings, reducing noise levels
Local Funds Only
Construction
$0
(State)
railroad crossings
within Downtown Edmonds during train crossings.
$10,000
Local, General Fund
$10,000
TOTAL
$7,516,515
$800,000
$474,000
$5,168,000
$6,782,000
$14,312,000
Pedestrian Projects:
Sunset Ave. Walkway
Provide walkway on the west side of Sunset Av.,
Secured Grant,
Engineering
$44,000
(Federal, secured)
$44,000
from Bell St. to Caspem St.
w/ various utility upgrades.
$687,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$687,000
$650,000
Unsecured Grant, &
&
(Local, Fund 421)
$75,000
$575,000
$200,000
(Local, Fund 423)
$50,000
$150,000
Local Funds
Construction
$692,000
Local
$5,000
$687,000
Maplewood Walkway from Main St. to
Install sidewalk on Maplewood St. from Main St. to 200th St. SW,
Engineering
$1,591,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$100,000
$130,000
$1,361,000
200th St. SW
creating connection to Maplewood Elementary and Yost Park.
Possible Grant
&
$0
(State)
Construction
$0
Local
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S
Install sidewalk on Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S, creating
Engineering
$789,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$56,000
$600,000
$133,000
to 9th Ave. S
connections to Westgate and Sherwood Elementary Schools.
Possible grant
&
$0
(State)
Construction
$0
Local
80th Ave. W Walkway from
Install sidewalk on 80th Ave. W from 2121h St. SW to 206th St. SW,
Engineering
$1,449,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$100,000
$110,000
$1,239,000
212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
creating connections to Chase Lake and College Place
Possible Grant
&
$0
(State)
Elementary Schools.
Construction
$0
Local
Citywide Pedestrian
Add Flashing pedestrian beacons, HAWK signal, or pedestrian actuations
Engineering
$1,310,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$100,000
$800,000
$410,000
Crossing Enhancements
existing signal at various location throughout the City
Possible Grants
&
$0
(State)
to improve pedestrian safety.
Construction
$0
Local
95th PI. SW Walkway from
Install sidewalk on 95th PI. W from
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
Possible Grants
&
$468,000
(State, unsecured)
$80,000
$388,000
to improve pedestrian safety.
Construction
$117,000
Local
$20,000
$97,000
Dayton St. Walkway from 7th Ave. S to
Install sidewalk on the south side of Dayton St.
Possible Grant
Engineering
$37,500
(Federal, unsecured)
$37,500
8th Ave. S
&
&
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$37,500
Local
$37,500
232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to
Install sidewalk on one side of 232nd St. SW
Possible Grant
Engineering
$1,055,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$100,000
$955,000
SR-104
&
&
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$250,000
Local
$100,000
$150,000
236th St. SW Walkway from SR-104 to
Provide sidewalk on south side of 236th St.
Secured Grant
$10,000
(Federal,secured)
$10,000
Madrona Elementary
&
Construction
$0
(State)
Local Funds
$10,000
Local, Fund 422
$10,000
236th St. SW Walkway from SR-104 to
Provide sidewalk on one side of 236th St. SW
Possible Grant
Engineering
$697,500
(Fedeml,unsecured)
$106,500
$591,000
97th PI. W
&
&
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$697,500
Local
$106,500
$591,000
84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to
Provide sidewalk on one side of 841h Ave. W
Possible Grant
Engineering
$45,000
(Fedeml,unsecured)
$45,000
234th St. SW
&
&
$0
(State)
Local Funds
Construction
$45,000
Local
$45,000
2nd Ave. S Walkway from James St.
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
to Main St.
Provide sidewalk along short missing link.
Local Funds Only
&
$0
(State)
Construction
$30,000
Local
$30,000
fl1
<i
rtF-41
(Q
Page 2
J°' Attachment: 2017-22 6-yrTIP Version (1458 : 2017-2022 TIP - Presentation)
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2017-2022)
Grant Opportunity
Project
(2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
Phase(s)
Total Cost
Source(s)
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
218th St. SW Walkway from 76th Ave. W to
Possible Grant
Engineering
$615,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$100,000
$515,000
Install sidewalk along missing link
&
&
$0
(State)
84th Ave. W
Local Funds
Construction
$600,000
Local
$100,000
$500,000
Wanut St. Walkway from 3rd Ave. to 4th Ave.
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
Install sidewalk along short missing link
Possible Grant
&
$105,000
(State, unsecured)
$105,000
Construction
$0
Local
216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99
Install 300' sidewalk on the north side of 216th St. SW
Possible Grant
Engineering
$137,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$137,000
to 72nd Ave. W
&
&
$0
(State)
from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W
Local Funds
Construction
$20,000
Local
$20,000
238th St. SW Walkway from SR-104
Install 800' of sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW
Secured Grant
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
to Hwy. 99
&
&
$294,000
(State, secured)
$294,000
from SR-104 to Hwy. 99
Local Funds
Construction
$95,000
Local
$95,000
15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
Install sidewalk on the south side of 15th St. SW from
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
Local Funds
&
$0
(State)
8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
Construction
$200,000
Local
$200,000
4th Ave. Corridor Enhancement
Create corridor improvements to encourage pedestrian
Possible Grant
Engineering
$3,450,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$100,000
$1,000,000
$2,350,000
Walkway
activity along 4th Ave. N from Main St. to
&
&
$0
(State)
3rd Ave. N from Downtown retail to Edmonds Center for the Arts
Local Funds
Construction
$675,000
Local, Fund 125
$100,000
1 $150,000
$425,000
Minor Sidewalk
Complete sidewalk missing links (from Short Walkway list of
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
Program
2015 Transportation Plan or other identified projects)
Local Funds
&
$0
(State)
Construction
$1,000,000
Local, General Fundt$50,OOOI
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
ADA Curb Ramps Improvements
Construct Citywide ADA compliant curb ramps where
Possible Grant
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
facilities don't exist nor meet current standards
&
Local Funds
&
Construction
$750,000
900,000
(State, unsecured)
Local, General Fund
$50,000
1 $50,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
Audible Pedestrian
Install audible pedestrian signals to
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
Signals
pedestrians heads at signalized intersections to improve
Possible Grant
&
$0
(State)
pedestrians with disabilities safety
Construction
$25,000
Local
$25,000
TOTAL
$1,314,000
$2,375,000
$793,000
$6,179,000
$3,432,000
$5,685,000
Bike -Link Install bike lanes and sharrows [ key bicycle locations to ) g ( (Fede 91) )
complete missinglinks such as along76th Ave. W, 212th St. SW... Secured rent Construction $560,000 Verdant rant $560,000
Traffic Calmina / Non -Motorized Transportation Safetv Protects
Traffic Calming Program /
Traffic circles, speed cushions,
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
Non -Motorized Transportation
radar feedback signs, bulb -outs, etc.
Local Funds only
&
$0
(State)
1
1
Safety
Construction 1
$120,000
(Local, General Fund)
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
Ferry Projects
Ferry Storage Improvements from
Provide additional ferry storage area closer to the Ferry Terminal
Engineering
$357,000
(Federal, unsecured)
$357,000
Dayton St. to Pine St.
(through striping revisions / C-Curb addition...).
Possible Grant
&
$0
(State)
Construction
$0
Local
Traffic Plannina Projects:
Edmonds Waterfront
Study: 1) Waterfront Access issues emphasizing and prioritizing near term solutions t(
Engineering
$0
Port of Edmonds
Analysis
providing emergency access; 2) At -grade conflicts where Main and Dayton St. interSE
Unsecured Grant and
&
$0
(State)
$865,000
BNSF rail lines; 3) Pedesitrian /Bicycle Access; 4) Options to the Edmonds Crossin
(Federal, unsecured)
$200,000
$665,000
Multimodal Terminal Pro'act identified as Modified Alternative 2 within the 2004 EIS
Local Funds
Planning
$135,000
Local, General Funds
$31,000
$104,000
Citywide
Complete an compliance evaluation of all existing ADA
Engineering
$0
(Federel)
Transition Plan
curb ramps, as well as long range plan on how to address
Local Funds Only
&
$0
(State)
those deffciencies.
Planning
$50,000
Local, General Funds
$50,000
Pavement Rating
Analyse the pavement condition of all arterial, collector, and local streets
$0
(Federal)
Study
to determine the stretches to be repaved as part of future
Local Funds Only
Planning
$0
(State)
annual overa s.
$30,000
Local / General Funds
$30,000
Transportation Plan Update
Engineering
$0
(Federal)
Update Transportation Plan
Local Funds Only
&
$0
(State)
Planning
$175,000
Local
$175,000
TOTAL
1 $311,000
$769,000
$0
$0
$175,000
so
Total $73,228,515
Page 3
$11,851,515 $5,384,000 $4,187,000 $14,949,000 $14,354,000 $22,503,000
Attachment: 2017-22 6-yrTIP Version (1458 : 2017-2022 TIP - Presentation)
City of Edmonds
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2017-2022)
Grant Opportunity
Project
(2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
Phases)
Total Cost
source(s)
2017
2018
2019
M.
2021
2022
Total Federal
$5,190,000
$3,091,500
$1,917,000
$8,794,000
$8,699,000
$12,647,000
Tolal Federal (Secured/
$3:734,000
$86,500
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Federal (Unsecured)
$1,456,000
$3,005,000
$1,917,000
$8,794,000
$8,699,000
$12,647,000
Total State
$2,304,827
$388,000
$0
$1,242,000
$837,500
$4,750,000
Total State (Secured)
$294,000
$0
$0
$0
$50() 00
$4,500,000
Total State (Unsecured)
$2,010,827
$388,000
$0
$1,242,000
$337,500
$250,000
Total Verdant
$560,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Verdant (Secured)
$560,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Port of Edmonds
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Local Fund
$4,096,688
$1,904,500
$2,270,000
$4,913,000
$4,671,500
$5,106,000
Total Local (Fund 112)
$125,000
$0
$0
$1,137,000
$1,738,500
$1,307,000
Total Local (Fund 125)
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$150,000
$425,000
Toal Local (Fund 421)
$851,475
$0
$0
$575,000
$0
$0
Total Local (Fund 422)
$460,528
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Local (Fund 4231
$768,685
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
Total Local with other jurisdictions
$0
$0
$0
$68,000
$339,000
$718,000
Total Local (Tra10c Impact Fees)
$100,000
$13,500
$0
$71,000
$0
$0
Total Local (General Fundl
$1,571,000
$1,794,000
$2,270,000
$2,812,000
$2,370,000
$2,436,000
fl1
<i
rtF41(Q
Page 4
J00 Attachment: 2017-22 6-yrTIP Version (1458 : 2017-2022 TIP - Presentation)
7.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Stormwater Management Code Update, Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 (20
min.)
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Rob English
Background/History
On August 2, 2016, a public hearing was held on the proposed update to the stormwater management
code.
On June 14, 2016, staff provided an update on the required stormwater code changes.
Staff Recommendation
Prepare an Ordinance and place it on the consent agenda for a City Council meeting in late September.
Narrative
A public hearing was held on the proposed stormwater code on August 2, 2016. The item is being
presented to the City Council for further discussion. Staff has made minor revisions, since the August
2nd City Council meeting, to correct terminology and improve wording to make it more clear and
concise.
The proposed stormwater code has been sent to the State for review and the SEPA process is
anticipated to be completed in September.
Staff recommends placing an ordinance on the consent agenda for a future City Council meeting in
September, to adopt the proposed stormwater management code changes and make it effective on
January 1, 2017.
The following documents are attached for reference:
Attachment 1 Proposed Stormwater Code
Attachment 2 Redlined Changes since August 2, 2016
Attachment 3 Original Redlined Changes
Attachment 4 August 2, 2016 Staff Presentation
BACKGROUND:
The City of Edmonds is a Department of Ecology Phase II Western Washington Municipal Stormwater
Permittee. As a Phase II permit holder, the City is required to update our stormwater code by December
31, 2016 to meet the minimum requirements of the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual.
This includes reviewing and revising all development -related codes, rules, and standards to incorporate
Packet Pg. 129
7.3
and require Low Impact Development principles and best management practices to make Low Impact
Development the preferred and commonly used approach to site development. The goal is to infiltrate,
disperse, and retain stormwater runoff onsite to the extent feasible.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - ECDC 18.30-FINAL DRAFT-08.22.2016
Attachment 2 - ECDC 18.30-FINAL DRAFT-08.23.2016-redlines from 08.02.2016 version
Attachment 3 - ECDC 18.30-Redline Version
Attachment 4 - SW Code Council Public Hearing-20160802
Packet Pg. 130
7.3.a
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Chapter 18.30
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Sections:
18.30.000 Purposes.
18.30.010 Definitions.
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
18.30.030 Applicability.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
18.30.050 Administration.
18.30.060 Requirements.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeal.
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
18.30.000 Purposes.
Page 1/23
A. To set forth standards for managing stormwater runoff from construction and development sites to minimize:
1. Degradation of surface water quality by controlling the scouring and sedimentation of creeks, streams,
wetlands, ponds, lakes, other water bodies.
2. Degradation of groundwater quality.
3. Damage to adjacent and other downstream private properties from erosion or other impacts from stormwater
runoff.
4. Damage of City -owned parcels, City roads, rights -of -way and associated infrastructure.
B. To comply with requirements in the Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal
Stormwater Permit as issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology).
C. To complement site planning activities that minimize:
1. Impervious surfaces area.
2. The loss of native or non-native site vegetation.
3. The generation of stormwater runoff.
D. To make low impact development (LID) the preferred and commonly used approach to site development; to require
LID be considered at the site planning stage; and to implement LID BMPs unless they are infeasible.
E. To require that all publicly -owned and privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control best management
practices (BMPs)/Facilities are operated, maintained and repaired in manner that conforms to this chapter.
F. To provide the authority for the City to inspect privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control
BMPs/Facilities.
G. To provide enforcement procedures for ensuring compliance with this chapter.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 131
7.3.a
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 2/23
18.30.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
Arterial. A road or street primarily for through traffic. The term generally includes roads or streets considered
collectors. It does not include local access roads which are generally limited to providing access to abutting property.
See also RCW 35.78.010, RCW 36.86.070, and RCW 47.05.021.
Adjustment. A variation in the application of a minimum requirement to a particular project. Adjustments provide
substantially equivalent environmental protection.
Applicant. The owning individual(s) or corporations or their representatives applying for the permits or approvals
described in this chapter.
Approval. The proposed work or completed work conforming to this chapter as approved by the public works Director
or their designee.
Best management practices (BMPs). The schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures,
and structural and/or managerial practices approved by the City that, when used singly or in combination, prevent or
reduce the release of pollutants and other adverse impacts to waters of Washington State.
Bioretention. Engineered facilities that treat stormwater by passing it through a specified soil profile, and either retain
or detain the treated stormwater for flow attenuation. Refer to the 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington (SWMMWW), Chapter 7 of Volume V for bioretention BMP types and design specifications.
Category 1 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.1 through No.S. See ECDC 18.30.60.C.
Category 2 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.l through No.9. See ECDC 18.30.60.C.
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL). An individual who has current certification through an
approved erosion and sediment control training program that meets the minimum training standards established by
Ecology (see BMP C160 in the SWMMWW). A CESCL is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion
and sediment control. The CESCL must have the skills to assess site conditions and construction activities that could
impact the quality of stormwater and, the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the
quality of stormwater discharges. Certification is obtained through an Ecology approved erosion and sediment control
course. Course listings are provided online at Ecology's website.
City's municipal separate storm sewer system or "MS4." A conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads
with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or storm drains)
that are owned or operated by the City of Edmonds, designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater, and are
not a combined sewer nor part of a publicly owned treatment works as defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) 122.2, and which is defined as "large" or "medium" or "small" or otherwise designated by Ecology pursuant to
40 CFR 122.26.
Clearing. The destruction and removal of vegetation by manual, mechanical, or chemical methods.
Commercial Agriculture. Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2) and activities involved in
the production of crops or livestock for commercial trade. An activity ceases to be considered commercial agriculture
when the area on which it is conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or has lain idle for more
than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation program, or unless the activity
is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an existing and ongoing agricultural
activity.
Common plan of development or sale. A site where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking
place at different times on different schedules and/or by different contractors, but still under a single plan. Examples
include: 1) phase projects and projects with multiple filings or lots, even if the separate phases or filings/lots will be
constructed under separate contract or by separate owners (e.g., a development where lots are sold to separate
builders); 2) a development plan that may be phased over multiple years, but is still under a consistent plan for
long-term development; 3) projects in a contiguous area that maybe unrelated but still under the same contract, such
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 132
7.3.a
Edmonds Page 3/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
as construction of a building extension and a new parking lot at the same facility; and 4) linear projects such as roads,
pipelines, or utilities. If the project is part of a common plan of development or sale, the disturbed area of the entire
plan must be used in determine permit requirements.
Converted vegetation (areas). The change in land cover changed from native vegetation, pasture scrub/shrub, or
unmaintained non-native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or where native vegetation is converted to pasture.
Creek. Is synonymous with "streams," which is defined in ECDC 23.40.320.
Detention facility. An above or below ground facility, such as a pond or tank, that temporarily stores stormwater
runoff and subsequently releases it at a slower rate than it is collected by the drainage facility system. There is little or
no infiltration of stored stormwater.
Development. Land -disturbing activities, including Class IV general forest practices that are conversions from timber
land to other uses. Creation or addition of hard surfaces, or replacement of hard surface that is not part of a routine
maintenance activity. Structural development, including construction, installation, replacement, or expansion of a
building or other structure. Subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and applied in Chapter
58.17 RCW
Director. The City's Public Works and Utilities Director or a designee with an appropriate background in engineering
or another related discipline.
Discharge point. The location where a discharge leaves the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) through the
City's MS4 facilitiesBMPs designed to infiltrate.
Ecology. The Washington State Department of Ecology.
Effective impervious surface. Those impervious surfaces that are connected via sheet flow or discrete conveyance to a
drainage system. Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are considered ineffective if: 1) the runoff is
dispersed through at least 100 feet of native vegetation in accordance with BMP T5.30 — "Full Dispersion," as
described in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW; 2) residential roof runoff is infiltrated in accordance with
downspout Full Infiltration Systems in BMP T5.10A in Volume III of the SWMMWW; or 3) approved continuous
runoff modeling methods indicate the entire runoff file is infiltrated.
Erodible or leachable materials. Wastes, chemicals, or other substances that measurably alter the physical or chemical
characteristics of runoff when exposed to rainfall. Examples include erodible soils that are stockpiled, uncovered
process wastes, manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage dumpster leakage.
Erosion. The wearing away of the land surface by running water, wind, ice, or other geological agents, including such
processes as gravitational creep. Also, detachment and movement of soil or rock fragments by water, wind, ice, or
gravity. See the SWMMWW Glossary for examples of types of water erosion.
Excavation. The mechanical removal of earth material.
Exception. Relief from the application of a minimum requirement to a project.
Fill. A deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.
Groundwater. Water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the land surface or below a water body.
Hard surface. An impervious surface, a permeable pavement, or a vegetated roof.
Highway. A main public road connecting towns and cities. In Edmonds, this includes State Route 99, State Route 524,
and portions of State Route 104, that are classified as principal arterials in the City's comprehensive transportation
plan.
Illicit discharge. Any direct or indirect non-stormwater discharge to the City's MS4, groundwaters, or a water body,
except as expressly allowed by ECDC Chapter 7.200.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 133
7.3.a
Edmonds Page 4/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Impervious surface. A non -vegetated surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle
as under natural conditions prior to development. A non -vegetated surface area which causes water to run off the
surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to
development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways,
parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam
or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Open, uncovered retention/detention
facilities shall not be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of determining whether the thresholds for
application of minimum requirements are exceeded. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall be considered
impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. Outdoor swimming pools shall be considered impervious
surfaces in all situations. In addition, lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, and other areas that have modified
runoff characteristics resulting from the addition of underdrains and impermeable or low permeability liners are to be
considered impervious surfaces. If no liner is installed, these areas (lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses,
etc.) served by underdrains may be considered pervious if the underdrain is set a minimum of 8 inches above the
in -situ soils in a manner to allow infiltration over the facility bottom.
Lake. An inland body of fresh water surrounded by land.
Land disturbing activity. Any activity that results in a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and
non -vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land -disturbing activities include but are not limited to
demolition, clearing, grading, filling, and excavation. Compaction that is associated with stabilization of structures
and road construction shall also be considered a land -disturbing activity. Vegetation maintenance practices, including
landscape maintenance and gardening, are not considered land -disturbing activity. Stormwater facility maintenance is
not considered land disturbing activity if conducted according to established standards and procedures.
Low impact development (LID). A stormwater and land use strategy that strives to mimic pre -disturbance hydrologic
processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and transpiration by emphasizing conservation, use of on -site
features, site planning, and distributed stormwater management practices that are integrated into a project design.
LID Best Management Practices (BMPs). Distributed stormwater management practices, integrated into a project
design, that emphasize pre -disturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and
transpiration. LID BMPs include, but are not limited to, bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof
downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water
re -use.
LID principles. Land use management strategies that emphasize conservation, use of on -site natural features, and site
planning to minimize impervious surfaces, native vegetation loss, and stormwater runoff.
Maintenance. Repair and maintenance activities conducted on currently serviceable structures, facilities, and
equipment that involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing and results in no significant adverse
hydrologic impact. It includes those usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation in the use of
structures and systems. Those usual activities may include replacement of dysfunctional facilities, including cases
where environmental permits require replacing an existing structure with a different type structure, as long as the
functioning characteristics of the original structure are not changed. One example is the replacement of a collapsed,
fish blocking, round culvert with a new box culvert under the same span, or width, of roadway. In regard to stormwater
facilities, maintenance includes assessment to ensure ongoing proper operation, removal of built up pollutants (i.e.,
sediments), replacement of failed or failing treatment media, and other actions taken to correct defects as identified in
the maintenance standards of Chapter 4, Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Maximum extent practicable (MEP). Refers to paragraph 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act which reads
as follows: Permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers shall require controls to reduce the discharge of
pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and system,
design, and engineering methods, and other such provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate
for the control of such pollutants.
MS4. The City's municipal separate storm sewer system.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 134
7.3.a
Edmonds Page 5/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Native vegetation. Vegetation comprised of plant species, other than noxious weeds, indigenous to the coastal region
of the Pacific Northwest which could have been reasonably expected to occur naturally on the site. Examples include
trees such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big -leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as
willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam flower, and fireweed.
Natural drainage systems and outfalls. The location of the channels, swales, and other non -manmade conveyance
systems as defined by the earliest documented topographic contours existing for the subject property, either from maps
or photographs, or such other means as appropriate.
Outfall. A point source as defined by 40 CFR 122.2 at the point where a discharge leaves the City's MS4 and enters a
surface receiving waterbody or surface receiving waters. Outfall does not include pipes, tunnels, or other conveyances
which connect segments of the same stream or other surface waters and are used to convey primarily surface waters
(i.e., culverts).
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs. A synonym for Low Impact Development BMPs.
Permeable pavement. Pervious concrete, porous asphalt, permeable pavers or other forms of pervious or porous
paving material intended to allow passage of water through the pavement section. It often includes an aggregate base
that provides structural support and acts as a stormwater reservoir.
Pervious Surface. Any surface material that allows stormwater to infiltrate into the ground. Examples include lawn,
landscape, pasture, native vegetation areas, and permeable pavements.
Person. Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal
corporation, agency of the state, or City government unit, however designated.
Pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS). Those hard surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in
stormwater runoff. See the listing of surfaces under pollution -generating impervious surface.
Pollution -generating impervious surface (PGIS). Those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant source of
pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to: vehicular use; industrial activities
(as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or
chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall; metal roofs unless they are coated with
an inert, non -leachable material (e.g., baked -on enamel coating); or roofs that are subject to venting significant
amounts of dusts, mists, or fumes from manufacturing, commercial, or other indoor activities.
Pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS). Any non -impervious surface subject to vehicular use, industrial
activities (as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); or storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes,
or chemicals, and that receive direct rainfall or run-on or blow-in of rainfall, use of pesticides and fertilizers, or loss of
soil. Typical PGPS include permeable pavement subject to vehicular use, lawns, and landscaped areas including: golf
courses, parks, cemeteries, and sports fields (natural and artificial turf).
Pre -developed condition. The native vegetation and soils that existed at a site prior to the influence of Euro-American
settlement. The pre -developed condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover unless reasonable, historic
information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement.
Project site. That portion of a property, properties, and/or right-of-way subject to land -disturbing activities, new hard
surfaces, or replaced hard surfaces. For projects that involve land disturbing activity on one or more parcels and land
disturbing activity in the City right-of-way, the "Project site" includes all areas of land disturbance. If the project is
part of a common development plan or sale, the disturbed area of the entire plan shall be used in determining permit
requirements.
Rain garden. A non -engineered shallow landscaped depression, with compost -amended native soils and adapted
plants. The depression is designed to pond and temporarily store stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, and to allow
stormwater to pass through the amended soil profile.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 135
7.3.a
Edmonds Page 6/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Receiving waterbody or Receiving waters. Naturally and/or reconstructed naturally occurring surface water bodies,
such as creeks, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and marine waters, or groundwater, to which a MS4
discharges.
Replaced hard surface. For structures means the removal and replacement of hard surfaces down to the foundation. For
other hard surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and replacement.
Replaced impervious surface. For structures, the removal and replacement of any exterior impervious surfaces down
to the foundation. For other impervious surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and
replacement.
Roadway. Traveled hard surface portion of any public or private road or street.
Road -related project. A project that all of, or the majority of, the new or replaced hard surface consist of roadway,
shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, or walkways, either publicly or privately funded.
Runoff. Water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers, streams,
springs, seeps, ponds, lakes and wetlands, as well as shallow ground water. It also means the portion of rainfall or
other precipitation that becomes surface flow and interflow.
Site. The area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels of land that is (are) subject to development. For
road projects, or utility projects in the right-of-way, the length of the project site and the right-of-way boundaries
define the site.
Slope. The degree of deviation of a surface from the horizontal; measured as a numerical ratio, percent, or in degrees.
Expressed as a ratio, the first number is the horizontal distance (run) and the second is the vertical distance (rise), as
2:1. A 2:1 slope is a 50 percent slope. Expressed in degrees, the slope is the angle from the horizontal plane, with a
90-degree slope being vertical (maximum) and 45 degrees being a 1:1 or 100 percent slope.
Soil. The unconsolidated mineral and organic material on the intermediate surface of the earth that serves as a natural
medium for the growth of land plants.
Source control BMPs. A structure or operation that is intended to prevent pollutants from coming into contact with
storm water through physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that are sources of pollutants.
The SWMMWW separates source control BMPs into two types. Structural source control BMPs are physical,
structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to prevent pollutants from entering stormwater.
Operational BMPs are non-structural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants from entering stormwater. See
Volume IV of the SWMMWW for details.
Stormwater facility. A constructed component of a stormwater drainage system, designed and constructed to perform
a particular function or multiple functions. Stormwater facilities include, but are not limited to, pipes, swales, ditches,
culverts, street gutters, detention ponds, retention ponds, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices, catch basins,
oil/water separators, and biofiltration swales.
Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). The Washington State Department of
Ecology's 2012 (as amended in 2014) Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Referred to as the
2014 SWMMWW.
Stormwater site plan. The comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary for
regulatory agencies to evaluate a proposed development project for compliance with stormwater requirements.
Contents of the Stormwater Site Plan will vary with the type and size of the project, and individual site characteristics.
It includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Construction SWPPP) and a Permanent Stormwater
Control Plan (PSC Plan). Guidance on preparing a Stormwater Site Plan is contained in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the
SWMMWW.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/Facilities. Detention facilities, treatment BMPs/facilities,
bioretention, vegetated roofs, and permeable pavements that help meet Minimum Requirements No.6 (Treatment),
Minimum Requirement No.7 (Flow Control), or both as described in ECDC 18.30.060.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 136
7.3.a
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 7/23
Threshold discharge area. An on -site area that drains to either a single natural discharge location or multiple natural
discharge locations that combine within one -quarter mile downstream (as determined by the shortest flowpath). The
examples below and in Figure G.1 presented in Volume I of the SWMMWW illustrate this definition. The purpose of
this definition is to clarify how the thresholds of this code are applied to project sites with multiple discharge points.
Example of a Site with a
Example of a Site with
Example of a Site with
Single Natural Discharge
Multiple Natural
Multiple Natural Discharges
and a Single Threshold
Discharges and a Single
and Multiple Threshold
Discharge Area
Threshold Discharge Area
Discharge Areas
4Natural
Natural Natural
,N ral Natural
bischar�"4--
:flischarge� •�
Discharge Dischalge •. ",
Dischprge-----• -..
------ -- Area
Area 1 Area 2
Area 1 Area 2
THRESHOLD
THRE HOLD
HRESHOLD THRESHOLD
DFSOHARGE
AREA.
�NSC ARGE--�
ISCHARGE DISCHI�RGE-;
(Shaded),
,A '"
AREA Tti, A1�EA2
�ed)
(ha)',""{
�
Natural
�� Natural —� i
� Natural s
Discharge
discharge
Discharge
i Location
l Location i
Location f
r
r
%Mile Downstream -_----------------
------
Nhortest flow path)
j
Vehicular Use. Regular use of an impervious or pervious surface by motor vehicles. The following are subject to
regular vehicular use: roads, un-vegetated road shoulders, bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway, driveways,
parking lots, unrestricted access fire lanes, vehicular equipment storage yards, and airport runways.
The following are not considered subject to regular vehicular use: paved bicycle pathways separated from and not
subject to drainage from roads for motor vehicles, restricted access fire lanes, and infrequently used maintenance
access roads.
Waterbody. Surface waters including rivers, streams, lakes, marine waters, estuaries, and wetlands.
Waters of the state. Includes those waters defined as "waters of the United States" in 40 CFR Subpart 122.2 within the
geographic boundaries of Washington State, and "waters of the state" as defined in Chapter 90.48 RCW which
includes lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters and all other surface waters and
water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington.
Wetlands. As defined in ECDC 23.40.005. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
A. The Public Works and Utilities Director shall administer this chapter and shall be referred to as the Director.
B. The Director shall have the authority to develop, implement, and enforce policies and procedures to administer and
enforce this chapter per ECDC 18.30.110 and 18.30.120, such as the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 137
7.3.a
Edmonds Page 8/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
C. The requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements. They do not replace, repeal, abrogate, supersede, or
affect any other more stringent requirements, rules, regulations, covenants, standards, or restrictions. Where this
chapter imposes requirements that are more protective of human health or the environment than those set forth
elsewhere, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. When this chapter imposes requirements that are less protective
of human health or the environment than those set forth elsewhere, the provisions of the more protective requirements
shall prevail.
D. The Director shall have the authority to impose additional requirements on a project or site to meet the purpose of
this chapter based on site -specific factors including, but not limited to, location, soil conditions, slope, and designated
use.
E. Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws, nor do they
indicate compliance with any other laws. Compliance is still required with all applicable federal, state and local laws
and regulations, including rules promulgated under authority of this chapter.
F. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all impacts to the environment. Thus,
compliance with this chapter should not be construed as mitigating all drainage water or other environmental impacts,
and additional mitigation may be required to protect the environment pursuant to other applicable laws and
regulations. The primary obligation for compliance with this chapter and for preventing environmental harm on or
from property is placed upon the applicant. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.030 Applicability.
A. This chapter applies to applications submitted on or after January 1, 2017 and applications submitted prior to
January 1, 2017, which have not started construction by January 1, 2022.
B. This chapter applies to the following actions on sites that discharge to the City's MS4 or discharges to waters of
the state whether or not a City -issued permit is required:
1. Land -disturbing activity, or
2. Creation of new hard surfaces, or
3. Replacement of existing hard surfaces, or
4. Conversion of pervious surfaces, or
5. New connections to the City's MS4, or
6. Any other actions that can increase the volume or rate of stormwater runoff, or cause the generation of
pollutants, from the site.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
A. Full Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are exempt from the provisions of this
chapter:
1. Forest practices regulated under WAC Title 222, except for Class IV general forest practices that are
conversions from timberland to other uses, are exempt from the provisions of the minimum requirements.
2. Commercial agriculture practices that involve working land for production are generally exempt. However,
land conversion from timberland to agriculture and the construction of impervious surfaces are not exempt.
3. Construction of drilling sites, waste management pits, and associated access roads, and construction of
transportation and treatment infrastructure such as pipelines, natural gas treatment plants, natural gas pipeline
compressor stations, and crude oil pumping stations are exempt. Operators are encouraged to implement and
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 138
7.3.a
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 9/23
maintain best management practices to minimize erosion and control sediment during and after construction
activities to help ensure protection of surface water quality during storm events.
4. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are exempt: pothole and square -cut patching,
overlaying existing asphalt or concrete pavement with asphalt or concrete without expanding the area of
coverage, shoulder grading, reshaping/regrading drainage systems, crack sealing, resurfacing with in -kind
material without expanding the road prism, pavement preservation activities that do not expand the road
prism, and vegetation maintenance.
B. Partial Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are partially exempt from the provisions
of this chapter:
1. Underground utility projects that replace the ground surface with in -kind material or materials with similar
runoff characteristics are only subject to Minimum Requirement No. 2, Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention.
2. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are considered development, and therefore are
not categorically exempt. The extent to which these requirements apply is explained for each circumstance.
a. Removing and replacing a paved surface to base course or a lower level, or repairing the pavement base:
If impervious surfaces are not expanded, Minimum Requirements No. 1 — No. 5 apply when the
thresholds identified for development projects in ECDC 18.30.060 are met. Where appropriate, project
proponents are encouraged to look for opportunities to use permeable and porous pavements.
b. Extending the pavement edge without increasing the size of the road prism or paving graveled shoulders:
these are considered new impervious surfaces and are subject to the minimum requirements that are
triggered when the thresholds identified for development projects in ECDC 18.30.060 are met.
c. Resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, asphalt, or concrete; or upgrading from gravel to asphalt or
concrete; or upgrading from a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal") to asphalt or concrete: these are
considered new impervious surfaces and are subject to the minimum requirements that are triggered
when the thresholds identified for development projects in ECDC 18.30.060 are met.
18.30.050 Administration.
A. Application, Submittals, and Review.
1. The Director shall review all plans and all other submittals required by ECDC 18.30.050.A.3 for compliance
with this chapter when:
a. An application for a City permit is required under all other chapters of ECDC Title 18 or 19, or
b. A subdivision application is submitted per ECDC 20.75.040.
In all other situations when actions under ECDC 18.30.030 apply to a project site, review shall be under a
Stormwater permit.
3. All stormwater review submittals shall contain, in addition to the information required under any other
applicable City code, a Stormwater Site Plan as described in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (see
ECDC 18.30.060) and any other information required by the Director.
B. Inspections.
1. The Director shall inspect projects at various stages of the work to determine if they comply with the
requirements of this chapter, and enforcement actions shall be taken as necessary. These inspections will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Prior to site clearing and construction to assess site erosion potential, and
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 139
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 10/23
b. During construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment
controls and other approved plan components, and
c. All permanent stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities and catch basins in new
residential developments every six months until 90 percent of the lots are constructed (or when
construction is stopped and the site is fully stabilized) to identify maintenance needs and enforce
compliance with maintenance standards as needed, and
d. Upon completion of construction and prior to final approval to ensure proper installation of permanent
stormwater control facilities and verify that a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for
maintenance is assigned for stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities, and
e. Post -Construction inspections per ECDC 18.30.090.
2. When reasonably required by the Director to accomplish the purpose of this chapter or to comply with local,
state or federal law or regulation on stormwater, special inspection or testing shall be performed by the
applicant.
C. Fees. Application, review and inspection fees as set in ECDC Chapter 15.00 shall be paid.
18.30.060 Requirements.
A. Documents. The sources of the stormwatcr management requirements for the City are from the following
documents:
1. Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, Appendix 1, modification date January 16,
2015
2. 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)
3. The Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
In the event of conflicts between the various provisions, the more stringent provision shall apply.
B. Illicit Discharges and Connections. Non-Stormwater illicit discharges, including spills, into the MS4,
groundwaters, or a water body from any developed or undeveloped lands are prohibited per ECDC Chapter 7.200
C. Thresholds and Applicability
The thresholds outlined in this section are only applicable to ECDC 18.30.060.C. See also the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum for supplemental information on thresholds.
a. All development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 2.
b. Category 1 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5. Category 1
includes projects that:
i. Result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Have land disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
c. Category 2 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9. Category 2
includes projects that:
i. Result in 5,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Convert 0.75 acres, or more, of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or
iii. Convert 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
2. Additional Requirements for road -related projects. For road -related projects, runoff from the new hard
surfaces (including pavement, shoulders, curbs, and sidewalks) and the converted vegetation areas shall meet
all the minimum requirements if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more. In addition, if the new
hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 140
7.3.a
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 11/23
the project limits, runoff from the new and replaced hard surfaces and the converted vegetation areas shall
meet all the minimum requirements. The project limits shall be defined by the length of the project and the
width of the right-of-way.
New Connections to the City's MS4 when the proposed connection does not involve activity that meets the
definition of development. Sites that are not currently connected to the City's MS4 but that wish to connect
directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 may be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval. For
sites that propose to drain greater than or equal to 2,000 square feet of hard surface area to the City's MS4,
minimum requirements and BMPs associated with stormwater flow control and/or water quality treatment
(such as those outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.D [I] through [9]) may be required if the connection poses any
risk to downstream systems such as erosion, flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water quality
degradation, or other related impacts.
D. Minimum Technical Requirements. This section describes the minimum technical requirements for stormwater
management at development sites.
1. Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans
The City shall require a Stormwater Site Plan from all projects meeting the thresholds in ECDC 18.30.060.0
Stormwater Site Plans shall use site -appropriate development principles to retain native vegetation and
minimize impervious surfaces to the extent feasible. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance
with Chapter 3 of Volume 1 of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater
Addendum.
2. Minimum Requirement No. 2 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
a. Thresholds:
i. All development projects are responsible for preventing erosion and discharge of sediment and
other pollutants into receiving waters. Compliance with this minimum requirement can be
achieved for an individual site if the site is covered under Ecology's General NPDES Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities and fully implementing the
requirements of that permit.
ii. A Construction SWPPP is required for all projects which a) result in 2,000 square feet or more
of new plus replaced hard surface area, b) where a structure with an exterior hard surface area of
at least 2,000 square feet is being demolished, c) which disturb 7,000 square feet or more of
land, or d) when the site falls within the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area, Landslide
Hazard Area or steep slope critical area. Projects that do not meet any of the above criteria are
not required to prepare a Construction SWPPP, but must consider all of the elements listed
below for Construction SWPPPs and develop controls for all Construction SWPPP elements
that pertain to the project site.
b. General Requirements:
The SWPPP shall include a narrative and drawings. All BMPs shall be clearly referenced in the
narrative and marked on the drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation to
explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for the project. Each of the thirteen
elements referenced below must be considered and included in the SWPPP unless site
conditions render the element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly
justified in the narrative of the SWPPP.
ii. Clearing and grading activities for developments shall be permitted only if conducted pursuant
to an approved site development plan (e.g., building permit, subdivision approval) that
establishes permitted areas of clearing, grading, cutting, and filling. These permitted clearing
and grading areas and any other areas required to preserve critical or sensitive areas, buffers,
native growth protection easements, or tree retention areas as required by the City, shall be
delineated on the site plans and the development site.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 141
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 12/23
iii. The SWPPP shall be implemented beginning with initial land disturbance and until final
stabilization. Sediment and Erosion control BMPs shall be consistent with the BMPs contained
in Chapter 4 of Volume II of the SWMMWW.
c. Seasonal Work Limitations:
From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities may only be
authorized by the City if it can be demonstrated that silt -laden runoff will be prevented from leaving the
site through a combination of the following:
Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil type, and proximity to
receiving waters; and
ii. Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and
iii. Proposed erosion and sediment control measures, in accordance with ECDC 18.30.060.D.2.d
below.
Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the City may expand or restrict the
seasonal limitation on site disturbance. The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing
and grading limitations, except for sites lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide
hazard area as defined by ECDC 19.10.020.F:
Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs,
ii. Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the soil
or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil, and
iii. Activities where there is one hundred percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the site
in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities.
d. Construction SWPPP Elements
Construction SWPPP elements are required in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.5.2 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
3. Minimum Requirement No. 3 — Source Control of Pollution
All known, available and reasonable source control BMPs must be required for all projects approved by the
City. Source control BMPs must be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with Volume IV of the
SWMMWW. All single family residential projects shall, at a minimum, incorporate required BMPs from
SWMMWW Volume IV, S411 — BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management.
4. Minimum Requirement No. 4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the natural
location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the project site
must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters and down gradient properties.
The discharge must have an identified overflow route that is safe and certain, and leads to the ultimate outfall
location (such as a receiving water or municipal drainage system). All outfalls require energy dissipation.
To demonstrate compliance with this core requirement, all projects shall submit an off -site qualitative
analysis. If an existing problem (or potential future problem after development) is identified, mitigation will
be required to prevent worsening of that problem. A quantitative analysis may be required for any project
deemed to need additional information or where the project proponent or the City determines that a
quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the conveyance system.
See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on complying with this requirement.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 142
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
5. Minimum Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management
a. Applicability:
Page 13/23
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs are required in accordance with the following project
thresholds, standards, and lists to infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff on -site to the extent
feasible without causing flooding or erosion impacts. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater
Addendum for additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
b. Project Thresholds:
There are five project scenarios outlined below that determine the applicability of Minimum
Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management. The first four scenarios apply to projects that
discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4. The fifth scenario applies to project discharges that do
not enter the City's MS4. Note that more than one of the five scenarios may apply to a given project:
Retrofit. Projects that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain
existing hard surfaces on the parcel or common plan of development that do not drain to an
approved Stormwater management facility are required to provide On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs to manage a portion of those existing hard surfaces that will remain after
project completion. BMPs from List No.I (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d) shall be applied to a
minimum of 25 percent of those existing unmanaged surfaces, but to no more than the area
equal to the proposed new plus replaced hard surfaces.
Only for those existing unmanaged hard surfaces that remain after project completion,
applicants are not required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility for
these existing surfaces (as is required under ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b [ii] and [iii] below).
However, if it is determined that the minimum 25 percent requirement cannot be met due to
BMP infeasibility, documentation of BMP infeasibility is required. In addition, when runoff
from exiting unmanaged hard surfaces is mixed with runoff from new plus replaced hard
surfaces, those BMPs must be selected and designed in accordance with the requirements for
management of new plus replaced hard surfaces (per sections [ii] and [iii] below). See the
SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on On -site
Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
ii. Category 1. Category 1 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and
are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.1 for all new plus replaced hard
surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iii. Category2. Category 2 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and
are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.2 for all new plus replaced
hard surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.e); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 143
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 14/23
iv. Direct Discharge Requirement. Projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound through the
City's MS4 (in accordance with the restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound
presented in Section 2.5.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW) do not have to achieve the LID
Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or full
dispersion, but must meet the following:
a. Projects must implement BMP T5.13 (Post -Construction Soil Quality & Depth); BMPs
T5.I OA Downspout Full Infiltration Systems, T5.1 OB Downspout Dispersion Systems, or
T5.1 OB Perforated Stub -out Connections; and BMP T5.11 Concentrated Flow Dispersion
or T5.12 Sheet Flow Dispersion; if feasible for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and
land disturbed. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for
additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
b. Edmonds Way specific requirements. After applying the requirements in item (a) above,
for all remaining project site runoff (e.g., from unmanaged surfaces, or from overflow
from on -site BMPs), the post -development 10-, and 100-year recurrence interval peak
flows shall not exceed, 0.25 and 0.45 cubic feet per second per acre of impervious surface
area, respectively. See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details.
V. Projects that do not drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 are required to implement one
of the following:
a. Project sites may discharge to the downstream private property (e.g., projects located
above BNSF property) with approval from the downstream property owner(s).
b. Project sites may discharge runoff to an on -site system.
For sites located within earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, a geotechnical design, analysis, and report by a geotechnical
engineer is required for the on -site system. On -site Stormwater Management
BMPs from List No.1 in ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d shall be evaluated for all
new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed. Projects are not required
to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility. The project
applicant may be subject to an extra permit processing fee for City review of
the geotechnical analysis. Projects are required to comply with all other
applicable City requirements, such as ECDC 19.10 (earth subsidence and
landslide hazard areas).
ii. For sites located outside earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.ii and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iii shall be
followed to evaluate site appropriate BMP's.
Subject to prior approval by the City, project sites may pump on -site runoff to the City's
MS4. A quantitative downstream analysis in accordance with Minimum Requirement No.
4 and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum will be required. If the City's MS4 does not
have adequate capacity to receive the applicant's pumped flows, the applicant is required
to install an on -site detention system to store runoff and pump it to the MS4 at an
approved rate.
c. LID Performance Standard
For projects that elect to meet the LID Performance Standard to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii)
and (iii), Stormwater discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations
for the range of pre -developed discharge rates from 8 percent of the 2-year peak flow to 50 percent of the
2-year peak flow from the project site. Refer to the Standard Flow Control Requirement section in
Minimum Requirement No. 7 for information about the assignment of the pre -developed condition.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 144
7.3.a
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 15/23
Project sites that must also meet Minimum Requirement No. 7 shall match flow durations between 8
percent of the 2-year flow through the full 50-year flow.
d. List No.I for Category 1 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
For projects that elect to use List No. 1 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum; and Competing Needs Criteria
listed in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Roofs:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW,
or Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5. I OA in Section 3.1.1 of
Volume III of the SWMMWW.
ii. Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14A in Chapter 5 of Volume V, or Bioretention in
accordance with Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or bioretention
facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the overflow which is at
least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
iii. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP T5.1 OB in Section 3.1.2 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
iv. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP T5.1 OC in Section 3.1.3 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The City
may waive the requirement to install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum
Requirement #4, or available City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
Other Hard Surfaces:
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW
ii. Permeable Pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW, or Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14A in Chapter 5 of Volume V, or
Bioretention in accordance with Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or
bioretention facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the
overflow which is at least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
iii. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
iv. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The City
may waive the requirement to install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum
Requirement #4, or available City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
e. List No.2 for Category 2 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 145
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 16/23
For projects that elect to use List No. 2 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (iii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW; and Competing Needs Criteria listed in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Roofs:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW,
or Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5. I OA in Section 3.1.1 of
Volume III of the SWMMWW.
ii. Bioretention (See Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum
horizontally projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total
surface area draining to it.
iii. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP T5.1OB in Section 3.1.2 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
iv. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP T5.1 OC in Section 3.1.3 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. Note that if
the project is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to be installed
to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5. In addition, the City may waive the requirement to
install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum Requirement #4, or available
City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
Other Hard Surfaces:
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
ii. Permeable pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
iii. Bioretention (See Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum
horizontally projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total
surface area draining to it.
iv. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. Note that if
the project is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to be installed
to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5. In addition, the City may waive the requirement to
install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum Requirement #4, or available
City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 146
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
6. Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment
Page 17/23
a. Project Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider
those hard and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC 18.30.060.C.2.
For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and the converted
vegetation areas. The following require construction of stormwater treatment facilities:
Projects in which the total of pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS) is 5,000 square feet or
more in a threshold discharge area of the project, or
ii. Projects in which the total of pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS) — not including
permeable pavements — is 0.75 acres or more in a threshold discharge area, and from which
there will be a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site.
b. Treatment -Type Thresholds and Facility Sizing:
Treatment -Type Thresholds in accordance with Step 2 (Oil Control), Step 4 (Phosphorus
Treatment), Step 5 (Enhanced Treatment), and Step 6 (Basic Treatment) of Chapter 2, Section
2.1, Volume V of the SWMMWW. Phosphorus treatment shall be required for projects draining
to Hall Creek and Lake Ballinger.
ii. Treatment Facility Sizing, including Water Quality Design Storm Volume, Water Quality
Design Flow Rate, and Downstream Facilities, of Chapter 2, Section 2.5.6, Volume I of the
SWMMWW.
c. Treatment Facility Selection, Design, and Maintenance
Stormwater treatment facilities shall be:
i. Selected in accordance with the process identified in Chapter 4 of Volume I, and Chapter 2 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW,
ii. Designed in accordance with the design criteria in Volume V of the SWMMWW, and
iii. Maintained in accordance with the maintenance schedule in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
d. Additional Requirements
The discharge of untreated stormwater from pollution -generating surfaces to ground water will not
be authorized by the City. All associated runoff must be treated using On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs designed to provide the required level of treatment in accordance with Chapter
5, Volume V and Chapter 7, Volume V of the SWMMWW; or by infiltration through soils meeting
the soil suitability criteria in Chapter 3 of Volume III of the SWMMWW.
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control
a. Applicability: Flow control is required on projects meeting the thresholds summarized below to reduce
the impacts of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces and land cover conversions. Flow control in
accordance with Minimum Requirement No. 7 is not required for projects that discharge directly to, or
indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound (other minimum requirements may still apply). See
ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Section 2.5.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW for additional restrictions
applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound.
If the discharge drains to a stream that leads to a wetland, or to a wetland that has an outflow to a stream,
both this minimum requirement (Minimum Requirement No. 7) and Minimum Requirement No. 8
apply.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 147
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 18/23
b. Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider only
those impervious, hard, and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC
18.30.060.C.2. For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and
the converted vegetation areas. The following circumstances require achievement of the standard flow
control requirement for western Washington:
Projects in which the total of effective impervious surfaces is 10,000 square feet or more in a
threshold discharge area, or
ii. Projects that convert 0.75 acres or more of vegetation to lawn or landscape, or convert 2.5 acres
or more of native vegetation to pasture in a threshold discharge area, and from which there is a
surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site, or
iii. Projects that through a combination of hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas cause a
0.10 cubic feet per second (cfs) increase or greater in the 100-year flow frequency from a
threshold discharge area as estimated using the Western Washington Hydrology Model or other
approved model and one -hour time steps (or a 0.15 cfs increase or greater using 15-minute time
steps).
Standard Flow Control Requirement (applies to discharges directly or indirectly to the City's MS4,
except for projects that meet the direct discharge requirements outlined in "a" above): Stormwater
discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations for the range of
pre -developed discharge rates from 50 percent of the 2-year peak flow up to the full 50-year peak flow.
The pre -developed condition to be matched shall be a forested land cover unless reasonable, historic
information is available that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement (modeled as "pasture" in the
Western Washington Hydrology Model). This standard requirement is waived for sites that will reliably
infiltrate all the runoff from hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas.
d. Additional Requirement: Flow Control BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance
with Volume III of the SWMMWW or an approved equivalent.
8. Minimum Requirement No. 8 — Wetlands Protection
a. Applicability: The requirements below apply only to projects whose stormwater discharges into a
wetland, either directly or indirectly through a conveyance system.
b. Thresholds: The thresholds identified in Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment, and
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control shall also be applied to determine the applicability of this
requirement to discharges to wetlands.
c. Standard Requirement: Projects shall comply with Guide Sheets No. 1 through No. 3 in Appendix I-D of
the SWMMWW. The hydrologic analysis shall use the existing land cover condition to determine the
existing hydrologic conditions unless directed otherwise by a regulatory agency with jurisdiction.
d. Additional Requirements: Stormwater treatment and flow control facilities shall not be built within a
natural vegetated buffer, except for:
i. Necessary conveyance systems as approved by the City; or
ii. As allowed in wetlands approved for hydrologic modification or treatment in accordance with
Guide Sheet 2 in Appendix I-D of the SWMMWW.
An adopted and implemented basin plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 of
Appendix 1 of the Phase II NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 148
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
9. Minimum Requirement No. 9 — Operation and Maintenance
Page 19/23
An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions in Volume I and Volume V of the
SWMMWW is required for proposed Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/facilities. The party (or
parties) responsible for maintenance and operation shall be identified in the operation and maintenance
manual. For private facilities approved by the City, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be
retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site, and shall be transferred with the property to the new
owner. For public facilities, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be retained in the
appropriate department. A log of maintenance activity that indicates what actions were taken shall be kept
and be available for inspection.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeals.
A. Exceptions.
1. The Director may approve a request for an exception to the minimum requirements of this chapter following
legal public notice of an application for an exception and of the Director's decision on the application. All
legal public notice related to this request for an exception shall be in the manner prescribed in ECDC
20.03.002 and the applicant shall pay all costs to publish the legal public notices required by this provision.
The Director shall provide and keep written findings of fact of the decision.
2. The approval of the exception shall only be granted when the applicant demonstrates that the requirement
would cause a severe and unexpected economic hardship. To determine whether the requirement imposes a
severe and unexpected economic hardship on the project applicant, the applicant must document for City
review and approval, all of the following, at a minimum:
a. The current, pre -project use of the site; and
b. How application of the requirement(s) for which an exception is being requested restricts the proposed
use of the site compared to the restrictions that existed prior to adoption of this chapter; and
c. The possible remaining uses of the site if the exception were not granted; and
d. The possible uses of the site that would have been allowed prior to the adoption of this chapter; and
e. A comparison of the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of the requirements versus
the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of requirements that existed prior to
adoption of the requirements of this chapter; and
f. The feasibility of the applicant to alter the project to apply the requirements of this chapter.
3. Any exception must meet the following criteria:
a. The exception will not increase risk to the public health and welfare, nor be injurious to other properties
in the vicinity and/or downstream, and to the quality of waters of the state; and
b. The exception is the least possible exception that could be granted to comply with the intent of the
minimum requirements.
4. An exception to the requirements shall only be granted to the extent necessary to provide relief from the
economic hardship as determined by the Director, to alleviate the harm or threat of harm to the degree that
compliance with the requirement becomes technically feasible, or to perform the emergency work that the
Director determines is warranted.
5. The Director may require an applicant to provide additional information at the applicant's expense, including
(but not limited to) an engineer's report or analysis.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 149
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 20/23
6. When an exception is granted, the Director may impose new or additional requirements to offset or mitigate
harm or the threat of harm that may be caused by granting the exception, or that would have been prevented
if the exception had not been granted.
B. Adjustments.
1. The Director may approve a request for adjustments to the requirements of this chapter when the Director
finds that:
a. The adjustment provides substantially equivalent environmental protection; and
b. The objectives of safety, function, environmental protection, and facility maintenance are met, based on
sound engineering practices.
During construction, the Director may require, or the applicant may request, that the construction of drainage
control facilities and associated project designs be adjusted if physical conditions are discovered on the site
that are inconsistent with the assumptions on which the approval was based, including (but not limited to)
unexpected soil or water conditions, weather -generated problems, or changes in the design of the improved
areas; and
A request by the applicant for an adjustment shall be submitted to the Director for review and approval prior
to implementation. The request shall be in writing and shall provide facts substantiating the requirements of
subsection (C)(1) of this section, and if made during construction, the factors in subsection (C)(2) of this
section. Any such modifications made during the construction of drainage control facilities shall be included
with the final approved drainage control plan.
C. Appeal.
1. The Director's decision on an application for an exception or adjustment may appeal to the hearing examiner
in accordance with a Type II appeal process in ECDC Chapter 20.06.
2. The applicant shall carry the burden of proof.
3. The decision of the hearing examiner is appealable to superior court in accordance with Chapter 36.70C
RCW. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
A. Access. Proper ingress and egress shall be provided to the City to inspect or perform any duty imposed upon the
City by this Title. The City shall notify the responsible party in writing of a failure to provide access. If the responsible
parry fails to respond within seven days from the receipt of notification, the City may order the work required
completed or otherwise address the cause of improper access. The obligation for the payment of all cost that may be
incurred or expended by the City in causing such work to be done shall be imposed on the person holding title to the
subject property
B. Covenants. Maintenance covenants shall be required for each site/lot that will be maintained by a private entity
such as an individual, corporation, or homeowner's association. The maintenance covenant shall address or append
requirements and responsibilities for long-term management and maintenance the applicable BMP(s). Maintenance
covenants shall be as specified in City Engineering Division documents or approved by the Director, and recorded
with Snohomish County and on all proper deeds [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
Proper construction inspection and maintenance of stormwater facilities is essential for the protection of the City's
MS4 and the environment.
A. Stormwater Maintenance and Inspection Standards. Stormwater facilities shall be inspected and maintained per the
requirements of Volume I and Volume V of the SWMMWW. For systems which do not have a maintenance standard,
the owner shall develop a standard based on guidelines from the manufacturer, designer, or a registered professional
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 150
7.3.a
Edmonds Page 21/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
engineer and submit the standards to the Director for approval. The purpose of the maintenance standard is to
determine if maintenance is required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facility's required condition at
all times between inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between inspections is not a violation of this
chapter.
B. Ownership. Stormwater facilities are either privately or publicly owned and maintained. All stormwater facilities
that serve private property are private, unless an agreement between the property owner and the City states otherwise.
Stormwater facilities that are privately owned by a homeowner's association or similar organization also are private.
The City may offer an incentive program to owners to support the proper maintenance of private storm drainage
facilities.
C. Public Stormwater Facilities. The City shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing
public stormwater facilities as funded through the Stormwater Utility.
D. Maintenance and Inspection of Permanent Facilities. All privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls shall
be maintained by the owner, or the homeowner or owner association ("owner") if one is established as part of a
residential or commercial development. All private storm drainage facilities shall be regularly inspected to ensure
proper operation and shall monitor the facility or control as required or as set forth in the SWMMWW. The Owner
shall maintain records of inspection and maintenance, disposal receipts, and monitoring results. The records shall
catalog the action taken, the person who took it, the date said action was taken, how it was done, and any problems
encountered or follow-up actions required. The records shall be made available to the City upon request. The Owner
shall maintain a copy of the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Manual (if required) on site, and shall make
reference to such document in real property records filed with Snohomish County, so others who acquire real property
served by the privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls are notified of their obligation to maintain such
facilities or controls.
E. City Inspection of private stormwater facilities. The City shall have the authority to periodically inspect private
stormwater facilities, including low impact development stormwater facilities, for compliance with this chapter.
F. Right of Entry. An authorized representative of the City may enter private property at all reasonable times to
conduct inspections, tests or to carry out other duties imposed by the a state or Federal program provided that the City
makes a good faith effort to notify the property owner or person responsible for the premises prior to entering and
presents proper credentials to that person. If entry is refused or cannot be obtained, the Director shall have recourse to
every remedy provided by law to secure entry, including but not limited to, obtaining an administrative warrant for
entry.
G. Right of Entry for Illicit Discharge. In the event of an illicit discharge from a privately -owned stormwater facility
caused by improper maintenance or operation or other circumstance, the provisions of ECC 7.200 shall apply.
H. Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon written notice by the City, a private stormwater facility shall be promptly
repaired and/or brought up to applicable standards by the property owner or the person responsible for said facility. If
a private stormwater facility serves multiple lots and the responsibility for maintenance has not been specified on a
recorded subdivision plat, short plat, or other legal document, maintenance, operation and repair responsibility shall
rest with the homeowners' association, if one exists, or otherwise with the properties served by the facility, or finally,
with the owners of the property on which the facilities are located.
I. Disposal of Waste from Maintenance Activities. Disposal of waste from maintenance activities shall be conducted
in accordance with the minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling, Chapter 173-304 WAC, guidelines
for disposal of waste materials from storm water maintenance activities, and where appropriate, the Dangerous Waste
Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
A. General enforcement action shall be in accordance with this chapter whenever a person has violated any provision
of this chapter. The choice of enforcement action is at the discretion of the City.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 151
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 22/23
B. Civil Penalties Adopted. ECDC Chapter 20.110 enforcement procedures are herein adopted in full, as modified in
this chapter, with the proviso that repeat offenders or violations deemed an immediate public hazard shall be subject to
compliance and appeal timelines as deemed appropriate by the Director based on the specific nature of the violation.
C. Maintenance Orders. The Director shall have the authority to issue to an owner or person an order to maintain or
repair a component of a stormwater facility or BMP to bring it into compliance with this chapter, the SWMMWW, the
Edmonds Stormwater Addendum, and the Edmonds Community Development Code. The order shall include:
1. A description of the specific nature, extent and time of the violation and the damage or potential damage that
reasonably might occur;
2. A notice that the violation or the potential violation cease and desist and, in appropriate cases, the specific
corrective actions to be taken; and
3. A reasonable time to comply, depending on the circumstances.
D. Civil Penalty. A person who fails to comply with the requirements of this chapter, who fails to conform to an
approval or order issued, who undertakes development without first obtaining approval, or who fails to comply with a
stop work order issued under these regulations shall be subject to a civil penalty levied in accordance with the
provisions of ECDC Chapter 20.110; provided, however, that the appeal process shall commence with a notice of
violation as provided in ECDC 20.110.040.13.
1. Civil penalties for code violations shall be imposed in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter
20.110; provided, however, that in addition to the penalties set forth in that chapter, the hearing examiner is
authorized to levy a penalty of up to twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per occurrence based upon an
assessment of the following factors. Where such factors are present, the hearing examiner is authorized to
levy such penalty after taking into consideration the full impact of the violation and any mitigating
circumstances (see subsection (2) below):
a. The violation created a risk to public health and the significance of the risk.
b. The violation damaged the environment and the significance of the damage.
c. The violation caused damage to public and private property and the significance of such damage.
d. A history of similar violations, if any.
e. The economic benefit of the violations, if any, to the person or entity responsible for the violations.
2. Mitigating circumstances which may be used to offset or reduce the time resulting from the application of the
preceding factors are limited to:
a. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and no history of similar violations.
b. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and a history of one or two similar violations
(lesser reduction).
c. A "voluntary compliance agreement" is defined as a legally binding agreement entered into between the
City and the alleged violators, by which the violator(s) acknowledge the existence of the violation, waive
all appeal rights, and agree to and do pay a fine in an amount stipulated to between the violator and the
City.
3. If the violation(s) are not corrected as ordered, or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into within
that time period and no appeal is filed, the penalty for the next 15-day period shall be 150 percent of the
initial penalties, and the penalties for the next 15-day period shall be 200 percent of the initial penalties. The
intent of this subsection is to increase penalties beyond the maximum penalties stated as an additional means
to achieve timely compliance.
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 152
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 23/23
Unless otherwise provided in a voluntary compliance agreement, civil penalties shall be paid within 30 days
of service of the notice and order or stop work order if not appealed. Payment of the civil penalties assessed
under this chapter does not relieve a person found to be responsible for a code violation of his or her duty to
correct the violation or to pay any and all civil penalties or other cost assessments issued pursuant to this
chapter.
The City may suspend immediate payment of civil penalties if the person responsible for a code violation has
entered into a voluntary compliance agreement. Penalties shall begin to accrue again pursuant to the terms of
the voluntary compliance agreement if any necessary permits applied for are denied, canceled or not
pursued, if corrective action identified in the voluntary compliance agreement is not completed as specified,
or if the property is allowed to return to a condition similar to that condition which gave rise to the voluntary
compliance agreement; provided, however, that additional penalties shall not be imposed until additional
notice and opportunity for hearing have been provided in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110.
Civil penalties assessed create joint and several personal obligations in all persons responsible for a code
violation.
E. The determination of the hearing examiner issued in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110 shall be appealable to
the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 36.70C RCW.
F. The remedies provided for in this section shall not be exclusive. The City may also use other civil and
administrative remedies available to it, including but not limited to the remedies provided in ECDC Title 19 and the
state building and dangerous buildings codes
I
Version: August 22, 2016
Packet Pg. 153
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Chapter 18.30
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Sections:
18.30.000 Purposes.
18.30.010 Definitions.
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
18.30.030 Applicability.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
18.30.050 Administration.
18.30.060 Requirements.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeal.
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
Page 1/23
18.30.000 Purposes.
A. To set forth standards for managing stormwater runoff from construction and development sites to minimize:
1. Degradation of surface water quality by controlling the scouring and sedimentation of creeks, streams,
wetlands, ponds, lakes, other water bodies.
2. Degradation of groundwater quality.
3. Damage to adjacent and other downstream private properties from erosion or other impacts from stormwater
runoff.
4. Damage of City -owned parcels, City roads, rights -of -way and associated infrastructure.
B. To comply with requirements in the Phase 11 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal
Stormwater Permit as issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology).
C. To complement site planning activities that minimize:
1. Impervious surfaces area.
2. The loss of native or non-native site vegetation.
3. The generation of stormwater runoff.
D. To make low impact development (LID) the preferred and commonly used approach to site development; to require
LID be considered at the site planning stage; and to implement LID BMPs unless they are infeasible.
E. To require that all publicly -owned and privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control best management
practices (BMPs)/Facilities are operated, maintained and repaired in manner that conforms to this chapter.
F. To provide the authority for the City to inspect privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control
BMPs/Facilities.
G. To provide enforcement procedures for ensuring compliance with this chapter.
18.30.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
Packet Pg. 154
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 2/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Arterial. A road or street primarily for through traffic. The term generally includes roads or streets considered
collectors. It does not include local access roads which are generally limited to providing access to abutting property
See also RCW 35.78.010, RCW 36.86.070, and RCW 47.05.021.
Adjustment. A variation in the application of a minimum requirement to a particular project. Adjustments provide
substantially equivalent environmental protection.
Applicant. The owning individual(s) or corporations or their representatives applying for the permits or approvals
described in this chapter.
Approval. The proposed work or completed work conforming to this chapter as approved by the public works Director
or their designee.
Best management practices (BMPs). The schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures,
and structural and/or managerial practices approved by the City that, when used singly or in combination, prevent or
reduce the release of pollutants and other adverse impacts to waters of Washington State.
Bioretention. Engineered facilities that treat stormwater by passing it through a specified soil profile, and either retain
or detain the treated stormwater for flow attenuation. Refer to the 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington (SWMMWW), Chapter 7 of Volume V for bioretention BMP types and design specifications.
Category 1 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.l through No.S. See ECDC 18.30.60.0
Category 2 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.l through No.9. See ECDC 18.30.60.0
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL). An individual who has current certification through an
approved erosion and sediment control training program that meets the minimum training standards established by
Ecology (see BMP C160 in the SWMMWW). A CESCL is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion
and sediment control. The CESCL must have the skills to assess site conditions and construction activities that could
impact the quality of stormwater and, the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the
quality of stormwater discharges. Certification is obtained through an Ecology approved erosion and sediment control
course. Course listings are provided online at Ecology's website.
City's municipal separate storm sewer system or "MS4." A conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads
with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or storm drains)
that are owned or operated by the City of Edmonds, designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater, and are
not a combined sewer nor part of a publicly owned treatment works as defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) 122.2, and which is defined as "large" or "medium" or "small" or otherwise designated by Ecology pursuant to
40 CFR 122.26.
Clearing. The destruction and removal of vegetation by manual, mechanical, or chemical methods.
Commercial Agriculture. Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2) and activities involved in
the production of crops or livestock for commercial trade. An activity ceases to be considered commercial agriculture
when the area on which it is conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or has lain idle for more
than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation program, or unless the activity
is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an existing and ongoing agricultural
activity.
Common plan of development or sale. A site where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking
place at different times on different schedules and/or by different contractors, but still under a single plan. Examples
include: 1) phase projects and projects with multiple filings or lots, even if the separate phases or filings/lots will be
constructed under separate contract or by separate owners (e.g., a development where lots are sold to separate
builders); 2) a development plan that may be phased over multiple years, but is still under a consistent plan for
long-term development; 3) projects in a contiguous area that may be unrelated but still under the same contract, such
as construction of a building extension and a new parking lot at the same facility; and 4) linear projects such as roads,
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
a�
0
U
c
a�
E
d
O
C
O
L
d
M
3
E
L
0
N
c0
C
O
.y
L
d
to
O
N
N
O
O
O
E
0
w
J
a
Z
LL
O
M
C6
U
0
U
W
N
C
0
E
t
v
R
a
C
N
E
t
t�
O
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 155
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 3/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
pipelines, or utilities. If the project is part of a common plan of development or sale, the disturbed area of the entire
plan must be used in determine permit requirements.
Converted vegetation (areas). The change in land cover changed from native vegetation, pasture scrub/shrub, or
unmaintained non-native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or where native vegetation is converted to pasture.
Creek. Is synonymous with "streams," which is defined in ECDC 23.40.320.
Detention facility. An above or below ground facility, such as a pond or tank, that temporarily stores stormwater
runoff and subsequently releases it at a slower rate than it is collected by the drainage facility system. There is little or
no infiltration of stored stormwater.
Development. Land -disturbing activities, including Class IV general forest practices that are conversions from timber
land to other uses. Creation or addition of hard surfaces, or replacement of hard surface that is not part of a routine
maintenance activity. Structural development, including construction, installation, replacement, or expansion of a
building or other structure. Subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and applied in Chapter
58.17 RCW
Director. The City's Public Works and Utilities Director or a designee with an appropriate background in engineering
or another related discipline.
Discharge point. The location where a discharge leaves the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) through the
City's MS4 facilitiesBMPs designed to infiltrate.
Ecology. The Washington State Department of Ecology.
Effective impervious surface. Those impervious surfaces that are connected via sheet flow or discrete conveyance to a
drainage system. Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are considered ineffective if: 1) the runoff is
dispersed through at least 100 feet of native vegetation in accordance with BMP T5.30 — "Full Dispersion," as
described in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW; 2) residential roof runoff is infiltrated in accordance with
downspout Full Infiltration Systems in BMP T5.10A in Volume III of the SWMMWW; or 3) approved continuous
runoff modeling methods indicate the entire runoff file is infiltrated.
Erodible or leachable materials. Wastes, chemicals, or other substances that measurably alter the physical or chemical
characteristics of runoff when exposed to rainfall. Examples include erodible soils that are stockpiled, uncovered
process wastes, manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage dumpster leakage.
Erosion. The wearing away of the land surface by running water, wind, ice, or other geological agents, including such
processes as gravitational creep. Also, detachment and movement of soil or rock fragments by water, wind, ice, or
gravity. See the SWMMWW Glossary for examples of types of water erosion.
Excavation. The mechanical removal of earth material.
Exception. Relief from the application of a minimum requirement to a project.
Fill. A deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.
Groundwater. Water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the land surface or below a water body.
Hard surface. An impervious surface, a permeable pavement, or a vegetated roof.
Highway. A main public road connecting towns and cities. In Edmonds, this includes State Route 99, State Route 524,
and portions of State Route 104, that are classified as principal arterials in the City's comprehensive transportation
plan.
Illicit discharge. Any direct or indirect non-stormwater discharge to the City's MS4, groundwaters, or a water body,
except as expressly allowed by ECDC Chapter 7.200.
Version: SeptembeF4Aqgust 22, 20156
to
C
O
.y
L
N
to
O
N
N
O
00
O
E
O
L
w
J
a
Z
LL
O
M
O
U
0
U
W
r
Q
Packet Pg. 156
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 4/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Impervious surface. A non -vegetated surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle
as under natural conditions prior to development. A non -vegetated surface area which causes water to run off the
surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to
development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways,
parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam
or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Open, uncovered retention/detention
facilities shall not be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of determining whether the thresholds for
application of minimum requirements are exceeded. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall be considered
impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. Outdoor swimming pools shall be considered impervious
surfaces in all situations. In addition, lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, and other areas that have modified
runoff characteristics resulting from the addition of underdrains and impermeable or low permeability liners are to be
considered impervious surfaces. If no liner is installed, these areas (lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses,
etc.) served by underdrains may be considered pervious if the underdrain is set a minimum of 8 inches above the
in -situ soils in a manner to allow infiltration over the facility bottom.
Lake. An inland body of fresh water surrounded by land.
Land disturbing activity. Any activity that results in a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and
non -vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land -disturbing activities include but are not limited to
demolition, clearing, grading, filling, and excavation. Compaction that is associated with stabilization of structures
and road construction shall also be considered a land -disturbing activity. Vegetation maintenance practices, including
landscape maintenance and gardening, are not considered land -disturbing activity. Stormwater facility maintenance is
not considered land disturbing activity if conducted according to established standards and procedures.
Low impact development (LID). A stormwater and land use strategy that strives to mimic pre -disturbance hydrologic
processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and transpiration by emphasizing conservation, use of on -site
features, site planning, and distributed stormwater management practices that are integrated into a project design.
LID Best Management Practices (BMPs). Distributed stormwater management practices, integrated into a project
design, that emphasize pre -disturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and
transpiration. LID BMPs include, but are not limited to, bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof
downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water
re -use.
LID principles. Land use management strategies that emphasize conservation, use of on -site natural features, and site
planning to minimize impervious surfaces, native vegetation loss, and stormwater runoff.
Maintenance. Repair and maintenance activities conducted on currently serviceable structures, facilities, and
equipment that involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing and results in no significant adverse
hydrologic impact. It includes those usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation in the use of
structures and systems. Those usual activities may include replacement of dysfunctional facilities, including cases
where environmental permits require replacing an existing structure with a different type structure, as long as the
functioning characteristics of the original structure are not changed. One example is the replacement of a collapsed,
fish blocking, round culvert with a new box culvert under the same span, or width, of roadway. In regard to stormwater
facilities, maintenance includes assessment to ensure ongoing proper operation, removal of built up pollutants (i.e.,
sediments), replacement of failed or failing treatment media, and other actions taken to correct defects as identified in
the maintenance standards of Chapter 4, Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Maximum extent practicable (MEP). Refers to paragraph 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act which reads
as follows: Permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers shall require controls to reduce the discharge of
pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and system,
design, and engineering methods, and other such provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate
for the control of such pollutants.
MS4. The City's municipal separate storm sewer system.
Version: SeptembeF4Aqgust 22, 201-56
J
a
Z
LL
O
M
O
U
0
U
W
r
Q
Packet Pg. 157
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 5/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Native vegetation. Vegetation comprised of plant species, other than noxious weeds, indigenous to the coastal region
of the Pacific Northwest which could have been reasonably expected to occur naturally on the site. Examples include
trees such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big -leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as
willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam flower, and fireweed.
Natural drainage systems and outfalls. The location of the channels, swales, and other non -manmade conveyance
systems as defined by the earliest documented topographic contours existing for the subject property, either from maps
or photographs, or such other means as appropriate.
Outfall. A point source as defined by 40 CFR 122.2 at the point where a discharge leaves the City's MS4 and enters a
surface receiving waterbody or surface receiving waters. Outfall does not include pipes, tunnels, or other conveyances
which connect segments of the same stream or other surface waters and are used to convey primarily surface waters
(i.e., culverts).
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs. A synonym for Low Impact Development BMPs
Permeable pavement. Pervious concrete, porous asphalt, permeable pavers or other forms of pervious or porous
paving material intended to allow passage of water through the pavement section. It often includes an aggregate base
that provides structural support and acts as a stormwater reservoir.
Pervious Surface. Any surface material that allows stormwater to infiltrate into the ground. Examples include lawn,
landscape, pasture, native vegetation areas, and permeable pavements.
Person. Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal
corporation, agency of the state, or City government unit, however designated.
Pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS). Those hard surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in
stormwater runoff. See the listing of surfaces under pollution -generating impervious surface.
Pollution -generating impervious surface (PGIS). Those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant source of
pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to: vehicular use; industrial activities
(as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or
chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall; metal roofs unless they are coated with
an inert, non -leachable material (e.g., baked -on enamel coating); or roofs that are subject to venting significant
amounts of dusts, mists, or fumes from manufacturing, commercial, or other indoor activities.
Pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS). Any non -impervious surface subject to vehicular use, industrial
activities (as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); or storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes,
or chemicals, and that receive direct rainfall or run-on or blow-in of rainfall, use of pesticides and fertilizers, or loss of
soil. Typical PGPS include permeable pavement subject to vehicular use, lawns, and landscaped areas including: golf
courses, parks, cemeteries, and sports fields (natural and artificial turf).
Pre -developed condition. The native vegetation and soils that existed at a site prior to the influence of Euro-American
settlement. The pre -developed condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover unless reasonable, historic
information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement.
Project site. That portion of a property, properties, and/or right-of-way subject to land -disturbing activities, new
impervious -hard surfaces, or replaced impervious -hard surfaces. For projects that involve land disturbing activity on
one or more parcels and land disturbing activity in the City right-of-way, the "Project site" includes all areas of land
disturbance. If the project is part of a common development plan or sale, the disturbed area of the entire plan shall be
used in determining permit requirements.
Rain garden. A non -engineered shallow landscaped depression, with compost -amended native soils and adapted
plants. The depression is designed to pond and temporarily store stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, and to allow
stormwater to pass through the amended soil profile.
Version: SeptembeF4Aqgust 22, 20156
J
a
z
LL
O
M
00
U
0
U
W
N
C
d
E
t
v
R
a
C
N
E
t
t�
O
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 158
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 6/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Receiving waterbody or Receiving waters. Naturally and/or reconstructed naturally occurring surface water bodies,
such as creeks, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and marine waters, or groundwater, to which a MS4
discharges.
Replaced hard surface. For structures means the removal and replacement of hard surfaces down to the foundation. For
other hard surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and replacement.
Replaced impervious surface. For structures, the removal and replacement of any exterior impervious surfaces down
to the foundation. For other impervious surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and
replacement.
Roadway. Traveled impervious -hard surface portion of any public or private road or street.
Road -related project. A project that all of, or the majority of, the new or replaced hard surface consist of roadway,
shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, or walkways, either publicly or privately funded.
Runoff. Water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers, streams,
springs, seeps, ponds, lakes and wetlands, as well as shallow ground water. It also means the portion of rainfall or
other precipitation that becomes surface flow and interflow.
Site. The area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels of land that is (are) subject to development. For
road projects, or utility projects in the right-of-way, the length of the project site and the right-of-way boundaries
define the site.
Slope. The degree of deviation of a surface from the horizontal; measured as a numerical ratio, percent, or in degrees.
Expressed as a ratio, the first number is the horizontal distance (run) and the second is the vertical distance (rise), as
2:1. A 2:1 slope is a 50 percent slope. Expressed in degrees, the slope is the angle from the horizontal plane, with a
90-degree slope being vertical (maximum) and 45 degrees being a 1:1 or 100 percent slope.
Soil. The unconsolidated mineral and organic material on the intermediate surface of the earth that serves as a natural
medium for the growth of land plants.
Source control BMPs. A structure or operation that is intended to prevent pollutants from coming into contact with
storm water through physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that are sources of pollutants.
The SWMMWW separates source control BMPs into two types. Structural source control BMPs are physical,
structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to prevent pollutants from entering stormwater.
Operational BMPs are non-structural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants from entering stormwater. See
Volume IV of the SWMMWW for details.
Stormwater facility. A constructed component of a stormwater drainage system, designed and constructed to perform
a particular function or multiple functions. Stormwater facilities include, but are not limited to, pipes, swales, ditches,
culverts, street gutters, detention ponds, retention ponds, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices, catch basins,
oil/water separators, and biofiltration swales.
Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). The Washington State Department of
Ecology's 2012 (as amended in 2014) Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Referred to as the
2014 SWMMWW.
Stormwater site plan. The comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary for
regulatory agencies to evaluate a proposed development project for compliance with stormwater requirements.
Contents of the Stormwater Site Plan will vary with the type and size of the project, and individual site characteristics.
It includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Construction SWPPP) and a Permanent Stormwater
Control Plan (PSC Plan). Guidance on preparing a Stormwater Site Plan is contained in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the
SWMMWW.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/Facilities. Detention facilities, treatment BMPs/facilities,
bioretention, vegetated roofs, and permeable pavements that help meet Minimum Requirements No.6 (Treatment),
Minimum Requirement No.7 (Flow Control), or both as described in ECDC 18.30.060.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
J
a
z
O
M
00
U
0
U
W
N
C
d
E
t
v
R
a
C
N
E
t
t�
O
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 159
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 7/23
Threshold discharge area. An on -site area that drains to either a single natural discharge location or multiple natural
discharge locations that combine within one -quarter mile downstream (as determined by the shortest flowpath). The
examples below and in Figure G.1 presented in Volume I of the SWMMW W illustrate this definition. The purpose of
this definition is to clarify how the thresholds of this code are applied to project sites with multiple discharge points.
Example of a Site with a
Example of a Site with
Example of a Site with
Single Natural Discharge
Multiple Natural
Multiple Natural Discharges
and a Single Threshold
Discharges and a Single
and Multiple Threshold
Discharge Area
Threshold Discharge Area
❑is charge Areas
Natllra!
•- Mscharge—"•"."
NAgral Natural
bischiMe"..-- ---Discharge----- -."
Natural Natural
" ---bischarge",_ Discharge-----• -..
"""""""-"l Area
Area 1 Area 2
Area 1 Area 2
THRESHOLD
DfSCHARGE
_---- THRE HOLD
W "�""' ""
HREStiOLD THRESHD
DISCHARB
AREA_
NSC ARG�-�
SCHARGE
Shaded ti
[ }
\A
AREA 1%• 4T EA2
.4
ed)
,
...... "
Natural � �
Natural
i Discharge
��
Discharge
Natural s
Discharge i
Location
Location
's
Location F
' r
� 1
% M i le Downstream .!-----------------
--- -------------- ^- --
(shortest flow Path)
4---
Vehicular Use. Regular use of an impervious or pervious surface by motor vehicles. The following are subject to
regular vehicular use: roads, un-vegetated road shoulders, bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway, driveways,
parking lots, unrestricted access fire lanes, vehicular equipment storage yards, and airport runways.
The following are not considered subject to regular vehicular use: paved bicycle pathways separated from and not
subject to drainage from roads for motor vehicles, restricted access fire lanes, and infrequently used maintenance
access roads.
Waterbody. Surface waters including rivers, streams, lakes, marine waters, estuaries, and wetlands.
Waters of the state. Includes those waters defined as "waters of the United States" in 40 CFR Subpart 122.2 within the
geographic boundaries of Washington State, and "waters of the state" as defined in Chapter 90.48 RCW which
includes lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters and all other surface waters and
water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington.
Wetlands. As defined in ECDC 23.40.005. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Art. A), 2016].
Version: 4Au�st 2222, 201-56
Packet Pg. 160
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
Page 8/23
A. The Public Works and Utilities Director shall administer this chapter and shall be referred to as the Director.
B. The Director shall have the authority to develop, implement, and enforce policies and procedures to administer and
enforce this chapter per ECDC 18.30.110 and 18.30.120, such as the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum.
C. The requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements. They do not replace, repeal, abrogate, supersede, or
affect any other more stringent requirements, rules, regulations, covenants, standards, or restrictions. Where this
chapter imposes requirements that are more protective of human health or the environment than those set forth
elsewhere, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. When this chapter imposes requirements that are less protective
of human health or the environment than those set forth elsewhere, the provisions of the more protective requirements
shall prevail.
D. The Director shall have the authority to impose additional requirements on a project or site to meet the purpose of
this chapter based on site -specific factors including, but not limited to, location, soil conditions, slope, and designated
use.
E. Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws, nor do they
indicate compliance with any other laws. Compliance is still required with all applicable federal, state and local laws
and regulations, including rules promulgated under authority of this chapter.
F. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all impacts to the environment. Thus,
compliance with this chapter should not be construed as mitigating all drainage water or other environmental impacts,
and additional mitigation may be required to protect the environment pursuant to other applicable laws and
regulations. The primary obligation for compliance with this chapter and for preventing environmental harm on or
from property is placed upon the applicant. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.030 Applicability.
A. This chapter applies to applications submitted on or after January 1, 2017 and applications submitted prior to
January 1, 2017, which have not started construction by January 1, 2022.
B. This chapter applies to the following actions on sites that discharge to the City's MS4 or discharges to waters of
the state whether or not a City -issued permit is required:
1. Land -disturbing activity, or
2. Creation of new hard surfaces, or
3. Replacement of existing hard surfaces, or
p
4. Conversion of pervious surfaces, or
5. New connections to the City's MS4, or
6. Any other actions that can increase the volume or rate of stormwater runoff, or cause the generation of
pollutants, from the site.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
A. Full Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are exempt from the provisions of this
chapter:
1. Forest practices regulated under WAC Title 222, except for Class IV general forest practices that are
conversions from timberland to other uses, are exempt from the provisions of the minimum requirements.
Version: SeptembeF4Aqgust 22, 20156
Packet Pg. 161
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 9/23
2. Commercial agriculture practices that involve working land for production are generally exempt. However,
land conversion from timberland to agriculture and the construction of impervious surfaces are not exempt.
3. Construction of drilling sites, waste management pits, and associated access roads, and construction of
transportation and treatment infrastructure such as pipelines, natural gas treatment plants, natural gas pipeline
compressor stations, and crude oil pumping stations are exempt. Operators are encouraged to implement and
maintain best management practices to minimize erosion and control sediment during and after construction
activities to help ensure protection of surface water quality during storm events.
4. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are exempt: pothole and square -cut patching,
overlaying existing asphalt or concrete pavement with asphalt or concrete without expanding the area of
coverage, shoulder grading, reshaping/regrading drainage systems, crack sealing, resurfacing with in -kind
material without expanding the road prism, pavement preservation activities that do not expand the road
prism, and vegetation maintenance.
B. Partial Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are partially exempt from the provisions
of this chapter:
1. Underground utility projects that replace the ground surface with in -kind material or materials with similar
runoff characteristics are only subject to Minimum Requirement No. 2, Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention.
2. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are considered development, and therefore are
not categorically exempt. The extent to which these requirements apply is explained for each circumstance.
a. Removing and replacing a paved surface to base course or a lower level, or repairing the pavement base:
If impervious surfaces are not expanded, Minimum Requirements No. 1 — No. 5 apply when the
thresholds identified for development projects in ECDC 18.30.060 are met. Where appropriate, project
proponents are encouraged to look for opportunities to use permeable and porous pavements.
b. Extending the pavement edge without increasing the size of the road prism or paving graveled shoulders:
these are considered new impervious surfaces and are subject to the minimum requirements that are
triggered when the thresholds identified for development projects in ECDC 18.30.060 are met.
c. Resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, asphalt, or concrete; or upgrading from gravel to asphalt or
concrete; or upgrading from a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal') to asphalt or concrete: these are
considered new impervious surfaces and are subject to the minimum requirements that are triggered
when the thresholds identified for development projects in ECDC 18.30.060 are met.
18.30.050 Administration.
A. Application, Submittals, and Review.
1. The Director shall review all plans and all other submittals required by ECDC 18.30.050.A.3 for compliance
with this chapter when:
a. An application for a City permit is required under all other chapters of ECDC Title 18 or 19, or
b. A subdivision application is submitted per ECDC 20.75.040.
2. In all other situations when actions under ECDC 18.30.030 apply to a project site, review shall be under a
Stormwater permit.
3. All stormwater review submittals shall contain, in addition to the information required under any other
applicable City code, a Stormwater Site Plan as described in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (see
ECDC 18.30.060) and any other information required by the Director.
Version: SeptembeF4Aqgust 22, 20156
Packet Pg. 162
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
B. Inspections.
Page 10/23
1. The Director shall inspect projects at various stages of the work to determine if they comply with the
requirements of this chapter, and enforcement actions shall be taken as necessary. These inspections will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Prior to site clearing and construction to assess site erosion potential, and
b. During construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment
controls and other approved plan components, and
c. All permanent stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities and catch basins in new
residential developments every six months until 90 percent of the lots are constructed (or when
construction is stopped and the site is fully stabilized) to identify maintenance needs and enforce
compliance with maintenance standards as needed, and
d. Upon completion of construction and prior to final approval to ensure proper installation of permanent
stormwater control facilities and verify that a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for
maintenance is assigned for stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities, and
e. Post -Construction inspections per ECDC 18.30.090.
2. When reasonably required by the Director to accomplish the purpose of this chapter or to comply with local,
state or federal law or regulation on stormwater, special inspection or testing shall be performed by the
applicant.
C. Fees. Application, review and inspection fees as set in ECDC Chapter 15.00 shall be paid.
18.30.060 Requirements.
A. Documents. The sources of the stormwater management requirements for the City are from the following
documents:
1. Western Washington Phase H Municipal Stormwater Permit, Appendix 1, modification date January 16,
2015
2. 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)
3. The Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
In the event of conflicts between the various provisions, the more stringent provision shall apply.
EB. Illicit Discharges and Connections. Non-stormwater illicit discharges, including spills, into the MS4, t
groundwaters, or a water body from any developed or undeveloped lands are prohibited per ECDC Chapter 7.200.
C. Thresholds and Applicability
1. The thresholds outlined in this section are only applicable to ECDC 18.30.060.C. See also the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum for supplemental information on thresholds.
a. All development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 2.
b. Category 1 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5. Category 1
includes projects that:
i. Result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Have land disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
c. Category 2 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9. Category 2
includes projects that:
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 +
Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at:
Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Inc
at: 0.25"
C
O
.y
L
N
co
O
N
N
O
M
O
E
O
L
w
N
d
C
L
m
O
N
M
N
M
O
t—
LL
C
J
Q
Z
LL
O
M
O
c.�
C
V
W
N
C
d
E
t
V
M
Q
r.+
C
N
E
t
U
O
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 163
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 11/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
i. Result in 5,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Convert 0.75 acres, or more, of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or
iii. Convert 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
2hard suFfaees (including paveraent, shoulders, cuFbs, and sidewalks) and the converted vegeta , ticm Area , q sha , 11 4:n
all dhe rAinim-um requifements only if the new hafd surfaces total 5,000 squia-re, -feet- om mwne and total 50 pereent or
,Additional Requirements for road -related projects. For road -related
projects, runoff from the new hard surfaces (including -pavement, shoulders, curbs, and sidewalks) and the
converted vegetation areas shall meet all the minimum requirements if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square
feet or more. In addition, if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more and total 50 percent or more of
the existing hard surfaces within the project limits, runoff from the new and replaced hard surfaces and the
converted vegetation areas shall meet all the minimum requirements. The project limits shall be defined by the
length of the project and the width of the right-of-way.
New Connections to the City's MS4 when the proposed connection does not involve activity that meets the
definition of development. Sites that are not currently connected to the City's MS4 but that wish to connect
directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 may be allowed on a case -by -case basis, subject to City approval. For
sites that propose to drain greater than or equal to 2,000 square feet of irnpeFvieus-hard surface area to the
City's MS4, minimum requirements and BMPs associated with stormwater flow control and/or water quality
treatment (such as those outlined in ECDC 18.30.060.1) [1] through [9]) may be required if the connection
poses any risk to downstream systems such as erosion, flooding, property damage, habitat damage, water
quality degradation, or other related impacts.
D. Minimum Technical Requirements. This section describes the minimum technical requirements for stormwater
management at development sites.
1. Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans
The City shall require a Stormwater Site Plan from all projects meeting the thresholds in ECDC 18.30.060.C.
Stormwater Site Plans shall use site -appropriate development principles to retain native vegetation and
minimize impervious surfaces to the extent feasible. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance
with Chapter 3 of Volume 1 of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater
Addendum.
2. Minimum Requirement No. 2 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (S)NPPP)
a. Thresholds:
All development projects are responsible for preventing erosion and discharge of sediment and
other pollutants into receiving waters. Compliance with this minimum requirement can be
achieved for an individual site if the site is covered under Ecology's General NPDES Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities and fully implementing the
requirements of that permit.
A Construction SWPPP is required for all projects which a) result in 2,000 square feet or more
of new plus replaced hard surface area, b) where a structure with an exterior hard surface area of
at least 2,000 square feet is being demolished, c) which disturb 7,000 square feet or more of
land, or d) when the site falls within the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area, Landslide
Hazard Area or steep slope critical area. Projects that do not meet any of the above criteria are
not required to prepare a Construction SWPPP, but must consider all of the elements listed
below for Construction SWPPPs and develop controls for all Construction SWPPP elements
that pertain to the project site.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Space Af
10 pt, Line spacing: single, Don't adju
space between Latin and Asian text, D
adjust space between Asian text and
numbers, Tab stops: 0.5", Left
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman,
Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0.2-
No bullets or numbering
m
0
c�
.r
c
d
E
d
O
C
O
L
d
3
E
L
0
N
O
C
O
.y
N
to
O
N
N
O
00
O
E
0
w
r
Q
Packet Pg. 164
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
b. General Requirements:
Page 12/23
i. The SWPPP shall include a narrative and drawings. All BMPs shall be clearly referenced in the
narrative and marked on the drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation to
explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for the project. Each of the thirteen
elements referenced below must be considered and included in the SWPPP unless site
conditions render the element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly
justified in the narrative of the SWPPP.
ii. Clearing and grading activities for developments shall be permitted only if conducted pursuant
to an approved site development plan (e.g., building permit, subdivision approval) that
establishes permitted areas of clearing, grading, cutting, and filling. These permitted clearing
and grading areas and any other areas required to preserve critical or sensitive areas, buffers,
native growth protection easements, or tree retention areas as required by the City, shall be
delineated on the site plans and the development site.
iii. The SWPPP shall be implemented beginning with initial land disturbance and until final
stabilization. Sediment and Erosion control BMPs shall be consistent with the BMPs contained
in Chapter 4 of Volume II of the SWMMWW.
c. Seasonal Work Limitations:
From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities may only be
authorized by the City if it can be demonstrated that silt -laden runoff will be prevented from leaving the
site through a combination of the following:
i. Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil type, and proximity to
receiving waters; and
ii. Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and
iii. Proposed erosion and sediment control measures, in accordance with ECDC 18.30.060.D.2.d
below.
Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the City may expand or restrict the
seasonal limitation on site disturbance. The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing
and grading limitations, except for sites lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide
hazard area as defined by ECDC 19.10.020.F:
i. Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs,
ii. Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the soil
or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil, and
iii. Activities where there is one hundred percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the site
in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities.
d. Construction SWPPP Elements
i. Construction SWPPP elements are required in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.5.2 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum.
3. Minimum Requirement No. 3 — Source Control of Pollution
All known, available and reasonable source control BMPs must be required for all projects approved by the
City. Source control BMPs must be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with Volume IV of the
SWMMWW. All single family residential projects shall, at a minimum, incorporate required BMPs from
SWMMWW Volume IV, S411 — BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
Packet Pg. 165
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 13/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
4. Minimum Requirement No. 4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the natural
location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the project site
must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters and down gradient properties.
The discharge must have an identified overflow route that is safe and certain, and leads to the ultimate outfall
location (such as a receiving water or municipal drainage system). All outfalls require energy dissipation.
To demonstrate compliance with this core requirement, all projects shall submit an off -site qualitative
analysis .,,...,as, F,.am e_,.m tiie site to the _ewes..:.,.. w t, _ If an existing problem (or potential future problem
after development) is identified, mitigation will be required to prevent worsening of that problem. A
quantitative analysis may be required for any project deemed to need additional dewtrstrearn-information or
where the project proponent or the City determines that a quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the
off -site impacts or the capacity of the conveyance system. See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for
additional details on complying with this requirement.
5. Minimum Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management
a. Applicability:
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs are required in accordance with the following project
thresholds, standards, and lists to infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff on -site to the extent
feasible without causing flooding or erosion impacts. See the SWMMW W and the Edmonds Stormwater
Addendum for additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
b. Project Thresholds:
There are five project scenarios outlined below that determine the applicability of Minimum
Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management. The first four scenarios apply to projects that
discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4. The fifth scenario applies to project discharges that do
not enter the City's MS4. Note that more than one of the five scenarios may apply to a given project:
i. Retrofit. Projects that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain
existing hard surfaces on the parcel or common plan of development that do not drain to an
approved stormwater management facility are required to provide On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs to manage a portion of those existing hard surfaces that will remain after
project completion. BMPs from List No.l (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d) shall be applied to a
minimum of 25 percent of those existing unmanaged surfaces, but to no more than the area
equal to the proposed new plus replaced hard surfaces.
Only for those existing unmanaged hard surfaces that remain after project completion,
applicants are not required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility for
these existing surfaces (as is required under ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b [ii] and [iii] below).
However, if it is determined that the minimum 25 percent requirement cannot be met due to
BMP infeasibility, documentation of BMP infeasibility is required. In addition, when runoff
from exiting unmanaged hard surfaces is mixed with runoff from new plus replaced hard
surfaces, those BMPs must be selected and designed in accordance with the requirements for
management of new plus replaced hard surfaces (per sections [ii] and [iii] below). See the
SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on On -site
Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
Category 1. Category 1 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and
are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.1 for all new plus replaced hard
surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d); or
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
J
a
Z
LL
O
M
C6
U
0
U
W
r
Q
Packet Pg. 166
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 14/23
Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iii. Category 2. Category 2 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and
are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.2 for all new plus replaced
hard surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.e); or
Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
Direct Discharge Requirement. Projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound through the
City's MS4 (in accordance with the restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound
presented in Section 2.5.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW) do not have to achieve the LID
Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or full
dispersion, but must meet the following:
a. Projects must implement BMP T5.13 (Post -Construction Soil Quality & Depth); BMPs
T5.10A Downspout Full Infiltration Systems, T5.10B Downspout Dispersion Systems, or
T5.10B Perforated Stub -out Connections; and BMP T5.11 Concentrated Flow Dispersion
or T5.12 Sheet Flow Dispersion; if feasible for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and
land disturbed. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for
additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
Edmonds Way specific requirements. After applying the requirements in item (a) above,
for all remaining project site runoff (e.g., from unmanaged surfaces, or from overflow
from on -site BMPs), the post -development 10-, and 100-year recurrence interval peak
flows shall not exceed, 0.25 and 0.45 cubic feet per second per acre of impervious surface
area, respectively. See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details.
Projects that do not drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 are required to implement one
of the following:
a. Project sites may discharge to the downstream private property (e.g., projects located
above BNSF property) with approval from the downstream property owner(s).
b. Project sites may discharge runoff to an on -site system.
For sites located within earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, a geotechnical design, analysis, and report by a geotechnical
engineer is required for the on -site system. On -site Stormwater Management
BMPs from List No.1 in ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d shall be evaluated for all
new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed. Projects are not required
to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility. The project
applicant may be subject to an extra permit processing fee for City review of
the geotechnical analysis. Projects are required to comply with all other
applicable City requirements, such as ECDC 19.10 (earth subsidence and
landslide hazard areas).
For sites located outside earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.ii and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iii shall be
followed to evaluate site appropriate BMP's.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
J
a
Z
LL
O
M
O
U
0
U
W
r
a
Packet Pg. 167
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 15/23
c. Subject to prior approval by the City, project sites may pump on -site runoff to the City's
MS4. A quantitative downstream analysis in accordance with Minimum Requirement No.
4 and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum will be required. If the City's MS4 does not
have adequate capacity to receive the applicant's pumped flows, the applicant is required
to install an on -site detention system to store runoff and pump it to the MS4 at an
approved rate.
c. LID Performance Standard
For projects that elect to meet the LID Performance Standard to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii)
and (iii), sormwater discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations
for the range of pre -developed discharge rates from 8 percent of the 2-year peak flow to 50 percent of the
2-year peak flow from the project site. Refer to the Standard Flow Control Requirement section in
Minimum Requirement No. 7 for information about the assignment of the pre -developed condition.
Project sites that must also meet Minimum Requirement No. 7 shall match flow durations between 8
percent of the 2-year flow through the full 50-year flow.
d. List No.l for Category 1 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
For projects that elect to use List No. 1 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum; and Competing Needs Criteria
listed in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
i. Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Roofs:
i. Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW,
or Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.10A in Section 3.1.1 of
Volume III of the SWMMWW.
ii. Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14A in Chapter 5 of Volume V, or Bioretention in
accordance with Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or bioretention
facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the overflow which is at
least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
iii. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP TS.IOB in Section 3.1.2 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
iv. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP TS.IOC in Section 3.1.3 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The City
may waive the requirement to install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum
Requirement #4, or available City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
Other Hard Surfaces:
i. Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
Packet Pg. 168
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 16/23
ii. Permeable Pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW, or Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14A in Chapter 5 of Volume V, or
Bioretention in accordance with Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or
bioretention facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the
overflow which is at least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
iii. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
iv. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The City
may waive the requirement to install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum
Requirement #4, or available City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
e. List No.2 for Category 2 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9.
For projects that elect to use List No. 2 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (iii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW; and Competing Needs Criteria listed in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
i. Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Roofs:
i. Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW,
or Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.10A in Section 3.1.1 of
Volume III of the SWMMWW.
ii. Bioretention (See Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum
horizontally projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total
surface area draining to it.
iii. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP TS.IOB in Section 3.1.2 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
iv. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP TS.IOC in Section 3.1.3 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. Note that if
the project is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to be installed
to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5. In addition, the City may waive the requirement to
install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum Requirement #4, or available
City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
Other Hard Surfaces:
i. Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
ii. Permeable pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
Packet Pg. 169
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 17/23
iii. Bioretention (See Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum
horizontally projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total
surface area draining to it.
iv. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. Note that if
the project is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to be installed
to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5. In addition, the City may waive the requirement to
install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum Requirement #4, or available
City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
6. Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment
a. Project Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider
those hard and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC 18.30.060.C.2.
For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and the converted
vegetation areas. The following require construction of stormwater treatment facilities:
i. Projects in which the total of pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS) is 5,000 square feet or
more in a threshold discharge area of the project, or
ii. Projects in which the total of pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS) — not including
permeable pavements — is 0.75 acres or more in a threshold discharge area, and from which
there will be a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site.
b. Treatment -Type Thresholds and Facility Sizing:
i. Treatment -Type Thresholds in accordance with Step 2 (Oil Control), Step 4 (Phosphorus
Treatment), Step 5 (Enhanced Treatment), and Step 6 (Basic Treatment) of Chapter 2, Section
2.1, Volume V of the SWMMWW. Phosphorus treatment shall be required for projects draining
to Hall Creek and Lake Ballinger.
ii. Treatment Facility Sizing, including Water Quality Design Storm Volume, Water Quality
Design Flow Rate, and Downstream Facilities, of Chapter 2, Section 2.5.6, Volume I of the
SWMMWW.
c. Treatment Facility Selection, Design, and Maintenance
Stormwater treatment facilities shall be:
i. Selected in accordance with the process identified in Chapter 4 of Volume I, and Chapter 2 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW,
ii. Designed in accordance with the design criteria in Volume V of the SWMMWW, and
iii. Maintained in accordance with the maintenance schedule in Volume V of the SWMMWW.
d. Additional Requirements
The discharge of untreated stormwater from pollution -generating surfaces to ground water will not
be authorized by the City. All associated runoff must be treated using On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs designed to provide the required level of treatment in accordance with Chapter
5, Volume V and Chapter 7, Volume V of the SWMMWW; or by infiltration through soils meeting
the soil suitability criteria in Chapter 3 of Volume III of the SWMMWW.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
Packet Pg. 170
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
7. Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control
Page 18/23
a. Applicability: Flow control is required on projects meeting the thresholds summarized below to reduce
the impacts of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces and land cover conversions. Flow control in
accordance with Minimum Requirement No. 7 is not required for projects that discharge directly to, or
indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound (other minimum requirements may still apply). See
ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Section 2.5.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW for additional restrictions
applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound.
If the discharge drains to a stream that leads to a wetland, or to a wetland that has an outflow to a stream,
both this minimum requirement (Minimum Requirement No. 7) and Minimum Requirement No. 8
apply.
Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider only
those impervious, hard, and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC
18.30.060.C.2. For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and
the converted vegetation areas. The following circumstances require achievement of the standard flow
control requirement for western Washington:
Projects in which the total of effective impervious surfaces is 10,000 square feet or more in a
threshold discharge area, or
Projects that convert 0.75 acres or more of vegetation to lawn or landscape, or convert 2.5 acres
or more of native vegetation to pasture in a threshold discharge area, and from which there is a
surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site, or
iii. Projects that through a combination of hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas cause a
0.10 cubic feet per second (cfs) increase or greater in the 100-year flow frequency from a
threshold discharge area as estimated using the Western Washington Hydrology Model or other
approved model and one -hour time steps (or a 0.15 cfs increase or greater using 15-minute time
steps).
Standard Flow Control Requirement (applies to discharges directly or indirectly to the City's MS4,
except for projects that meet the direct discharge requirements outlined in "a" above): Stormwater
discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations for the range of
pre -developed discharge rates from 50 percent of the 2-year peak flow up to the full 50-year peak flow.
The pre -developed condition to be matched shall be a forested land cover unless reasonable, historic
information is available that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement (modeled as "pasture" in the
Western Washington Hydrology Model). This standard requirement is waived for sites that will reliably
infiltrate all the runoff from hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas.
d. Additional Requirement: Flow Control BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance
with Volume III of the SWMMWW or an approved equivalent.
8. Minimum Requirement No. 8 — Wetlands Protection
a. Applicability: The requirements below apply only to projects whose stormwater discharges into a
wetland, either directly or indirectly through a conveyance system.
b. Thresholds: The thresholds identified in Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment, and
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control shall also be applied to determine the applicability of this
requirement to discharges to wetlands.
c. Standard Requirement: Projects shall comply with Guide Sheets No. 1 through No. 3 in Appendix I-D of
the SWMMWW. The hydrologic analysis shall use the existing land cover condition to determine the
existing hydrologic conditions unless directed otherwise by a regulatory agency with jurisdiction.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
J
a
Z
LL
0
M
O
U
0
U
W
r
Q
Packet Pg. 171
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 19/23
d. Additional Requirements: Stormwater treatment and flow control facilities shall not be built within a
natural vegetated buffer, except for:
i. Necessary conveyance systems as approved by the City; or
ii. As allowed in wetlands approved for hydrologic modification or treatment in accordance with
Guide Sheet 2 in Appendix I-D of the SWMMWW.
An adopted and implemented basin plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 of
Appendix 1 of the Phase II NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit.
9. Minimum Requirement No. 9 — Operation and Maintenance
An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions in Volume I and Volume V of the
SWMMWW is required for proposed Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/facilities. The party (or
parties) responsible for maintenance and operation shall be identified in the operation and maintenance
manual. For private facilities approved by the City, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be
retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site, and shall be transferred with the property to the new
owner. For public facilities, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be retained in the
appropriate department. A log of maintenance activity that indicates what actions were taken shall be kept
and be available for inspection.
18.30.070 Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeals.
A. Exceptions.
1. The Director may approve a request for an exception to the minimum requirements of this chapter following
legal public notice of an application for an exception and of the Director's decision on the application. All
legal public notice related to this request for an exception shall be in the manner prescribed in ECDC
20.03.002 and the applicant shall pay all costs to publish the legal public notices required by this provision.
The Director shall provide and keep written findings of fact of the decision.
2. The approval of the exception shall only be granted when the applicant demonstrates that the requirement
would cause a severe and unexpected economic hardship. To determine whether the requirement imposes a
severe and unexpected economic hardship on the project applicant, the applicant must document for City
review and approval, all of the following, at a minimum:
a. The current, pre -project use of the site; and
b. How application of the requirement(s) for which an exception is being requested restricts the proposed
use of the site compared to the restrictions that existed prior to adoption of this chapter; and
c. The possible remaining uses of the site if the exception were not granted; and
d. The possible uses of the site that would have been allowed prior to the adoption of this chapter; and
e. A comparison of the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of the requirements versus
the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of requirements that existed prior to
adoption of the requirements of this chapter; and
f. The feasibility of the applicant to alter the project to apply the requirements of this chapter.
3. Any exception must meet the following criteria:
a. The exception will not increase risk to the public health and welfare, nor be injurious to other properties
in the vicinity and/or downstream, and to the quality of waters of the state; and
b. The exception is the least possible exception that could be granted to comply with the intent of the
minimum requirements.
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 201-56
Packet Pg. 172
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 20/23
4. An exception to the requirements shall only be granted to the extent necessary to provide relief from the
economic hardship as determined by the Director, to alleviate the harm or threat of harm to the degree that
compliance with the requirement becomes technically feasible, or to perform the emergency work that the
Director determines is warranted.
5. The Director may require an applicant to provide additional information at the applicant's expense, including
(but not limited to) an engineer's report or analysis.
6. When an exception is granted, the Director may impose new or additional requirements to offset or mitigate
harm or the threat of harm that may be caused by granting the exception, or that would have been prevented
if the exception had not been granted.
B. Adjustments.
The Director may approve a request for adjustments to the requirements of this chapter when the Director
finds that:
a. The adjustment provides substantially equivalent environmental protection; and
b. The objectives of safety, function, environmental protection, and facility maintenance are met, based on
sound engineering practices.
During construction, the Director may require, or the applicant may request, that the construction of drainage
control facilities and associated project designs be adjusted if physical conditions are discovered on the site
that are inconsistent with the assumptions on which the approval was based, including (but not limited to)
unexpected soil or water conditions, weather -generated problems, or changes in the design of the improved
areas; and
3. A request by the applicant for an adjustment shall be submitted to the Director for review and approval prior
to implementation. The request shall be in writing and shall provide facts substantiating the requirements of
subsection (C)(1) of this section, and if made during construction, the factors in subsection (C)(2) of this
section. Any such modifications made during the construction of drainage control facilities shall be included
with the final approved drainage control plan.
C. Appeal.
1. The Director's decision on an application for an exception or adjustment may appeal to the hearing examiner
in accordance with a Type II appeal process in ECDC Chapter 20.06.
2. The applicant shall carry the burden of proof.
3. The decision of the hearing examiner is appealable to superior court in accordance with Chapter 36.70C
RCW. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.080 Access and Covenants.
A. Access. Proper ingress and egress shall be provided to the City to inspect or perform any duty imposed upon the
City by this Title. The City shall notify the responsible party in writing of a failure to provide access. If the responsible
party fails to respond within seven days from the receipt of notification, the City may order the work required
completed or otherwise address the cause of improper access. The obligation for the payment of all cost that may be
incurred or expended by the City in causing such work to be done shall be imposed on the person holding title to the
subject property
B. Covenants. Maintenance covenants shall be required for each site/lot that will be maintained by a private entity
such as an individual, corporation, or homeowner's association. The maintenance covenant shall address or append
requirements and responsibilities for long-term management and maintenance the applicable BMP(s). Maintenance
covenants shall be as specified in City Engineering Division documents or approved by the Director, and recorded
with Snohomish County and on all proper deeds [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
J
a
Z
LL
O
M
00
U
0
U
W
N
C
d
E
t
v
R
a
C
N
E
t
t)
O
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 173
7.3.b
Edmonds Page 21/23
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities.
Proper construction inspection and maintenance of stormwater facilities is essential for the protection of the City's
MS4 and the environment.
A. Stormwater Maintenance and Inspection Standards. Stormwater facilities shall be inspected and maintained per the
requirements of Volume I and Volume V of the SWMMWW. For systems which do not have a maintenance standard,
the owner shall develop a standard based on guidelines from the manufacturer, designer, or a registered professional
engineer and submit the standards to the Director for approval. The purpose of the maintenance standard is to
determine if maintenance is required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facility's required condition at
all times between inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between inspections is not a violation of this
chapter.
B. Ownership. Stormwater facilities are either privately or publicly owned and maintained. All stormwater facilities
that serve private property are private, unless an agreement between the property owner and the City states otherwise.
Stormwater facilities that are privately owned by a homeowner's association or similar organization also are private.
The City may offer an incentive program to owners to support the proper maintenance of private storm drainage
facilities.
C. Public Stormwater Facilities. The City shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing
public stormwater facilities as funded through the Stormwater Utility.
D. Maintenance and Inspection of Permanent Facilities. All privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls shall
be maintained by the owner, or the homeowner or owner association ("owner") if one is established as part of a
residential or commercial development. All private storm drainage facilities shall be regularly inspected to ensure
proper operation and shall monitor the facility or control as required or as set forth in the SWMMWW. The Owner
shall maintain records of inspection and maintenance, disposal receipts, and monitoring results. The records shall
catalog the action taken, the person who took it, the date said action was taken, how it was done, and any problems
encountered or follow-up actions required. The records shall be made available to the City upon request. The Owner
shall maintain a copy of the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Manual (if required) on site, and shall make
reference to such document in real property records filed with Snohomish County, so others who acquire real property
served by the privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls are notified of their obligation to maintain such
facilities or controls.
E. City Inspection of private stormwater facilities. The City shall have the authority to periodically inspect private
stormwater facilities, including low impact development stormwater facilities, for compliance with this chapter.
F. Right of Entry. An authorized representative of the City may enter private property at all reasonable times to
conduct inspections, tests or to carry out other duties imposed by the a state or Federal program provided that the City
makes a good faith effort to notify the property owner or person responsible for the premises prior to entering and
presents proper credentials to that person. If entry is refused or cannot be obtained, the Director shall have recourse to
every remedy provided by law to secure entry, including but not limited to, obtaining an administrative warrant for
entry.
G. Right of Entry for Illicit Discharge. In the event of an illicit discharge from a privately -owned stormwater facility
caused by improper maintenance or operation or other circumstance, the provisions of ECC 7.200 shall apply.
H. Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon written notice by the City, a private stormwater facility shall be promptly
repaired and/or brought up to applicable standards by the property owner or the person responsible for said facility. If
a private stormwater facility serves multiple lots and the responsibility for maintenance has not been specified on a
recorded subdivision plat, short plat, or other legal document, maintenance, operation and repair responsibility shall
rest with the homeowners' association, if one exists, or otherwise with the properties served by the facility, or finally,
with the owners of the property on which the facilities are located.
I. Disposal of Waste from Maintenance Activities. Disposal of waste from maintenance activities shall be conducted
in accordance with the minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling, Chapter 173-304 WAC, guidelines
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20136
J
a
Z
LL
O
M
CO
U
0
U
W
N
r
C
d
E
t
v
R
a
C
C)
E
t
t�
M
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 174
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 22/23
for disposal of waste materials from storm water maintenance activities, and where appropriate, the Dangerous Waste
Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC.
18.30.100 Enforcement Procedures.
A. General enforcement action shall be in accordance with this chapter whenever a person has violated any provision
of this chapter. The choice of enforcement action is at the discretion of the City.
B. Civil Penalties Adopted. ECDC Chapter 20.110 enforcement procedures are herein adopted in full, as modified in
this chapter, with the proviso that repeat offenders or violations deemed an immediate public hazard shall be subject to
compliance and appeal timelines as deemed appropriate by the Director based on the specific nature of the violation.
C. Maintenance Orders. The Director shall have the authority to issue to an owner or person an order to maintain or
repair a component of a stormwater facility or BMP to bring it into compliance with this chapter, the SWMMW W, the
Edmonds Stormwater Addendum, and the Edmonds Community Development Code. The order shall include:
1. A description of the specific nature, extent and time of the violation and the damage or potential damage that
reasonably might occur;
2. A notice that the violation or the potential violation cease and desist and, in appropriate cases, the specific
corrective actions to be taken; and
3. A reasonable time to comply, depending on the circumstances.
D. Civil Penalty. A person who fails to comply with the requirements of this chapter, who fails to conform to an
approval or order issued, who undertakes development without first obtaining approval, or who fails to comply with a
stop work order issued under these regulations shall be subject to a civil penalty levied in accordance with the
provisions of ECDC Chapter 20.110; provided, however, that the appeal process shall commence with a notice of
violation as provided in ECDC 20.110.040.B.
1. Civil penalties for code violations shall be imposed in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter
20.110; provided, however, that in addition to the penalties set forth in that chapter, the hearing examiner is
authorized to levy a penalty of up to twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per occurrence based upon an
assessment of the following factors. Where such factors are present, the hearing examiner is authorized to
levy such penalty after taking into consideration the full impact of the violation and any mitigating
circumstances (see subsection (2) below):
a. The violation created a risk to public health and the significance of the risk.
b. The violation damaged the environment and the significance of the damage.
c. The violation caused damage to public and private property and the significance of such damage.
d. A history of similar violations, if any.
e. The economic benefit of the violations, if any, to the person or entity responsible for the violations.
2. Mitigating circumstances which may be used to offset or reduce the time resulting from the application of the
preceding factors are limited to:
a. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and no history of similar violations.
b. Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and a history of one or two similar violations
(lesser reduction).
c. A "voluntary compliance agreement' is defined as a legally binding agreement entered into between the
City and the alleged violators, by which the violator(s) acknowledge the existence of the violation, waive
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20136
Packet Pg. 175
7.3.b
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 23/23
all appeal rights, and agree to and do pay a fine in an amount stipulated to between the violator and the
City.
3. If the violation(s) are not corrected as ordered, or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into within
that time period and no appeal is filed, the penalty for the next 15-day period shall be 150 percent of the
initial penalties, and the penalties for the next 15-day period shall be 200 percent of the initial penalties. The
intent of this subsection is to increase penalties beyond the maximum penalties stated as an additional means
to achieve timely compliance.
4. Unless otherwise provided in a voluntary compliance agreement, civil penalties shall be paid within 30 days
of service of the notice and order or stop work order if not appealed. Payment of the civil penalties assessed
under this chapter does not relieve a person found to be responsible for a code violation of his or her duty to
correct the violation or to pay any and all civil penalties or other cost assessments issued pursuant to this
chapter.
5. The City may suspend immediate payment of civil penalties if the person responsible for a code violation has
entered into a voluntary compliance agreement. Penalties shall begin to accrue again pursuant to the terms of
the voluntary compliance agreement if any necessary permits applied for are denied, canceled or not
pursued, if corrective action identified in the voluntary compliance agreement is not completed as specified,
or if the property is allowed to return to a condition similar to that condition which gave rise to the voluntary
compliance agreement; provided, however, that additional penalties shall not be imposed until additional
notice and opportunity for hearing have been provided in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110.
6. Civil penalties assessed create joint and several personal obligations in all persons responsible for a code
violation.
E. The determination of the hearing examiner issued in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110 shall be appealable to
the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 36.70C RCW.
The remedies provided for in this section shall not be exclusive. The City may also use other civil and
administrative remedies available to it, including but not limited to the remedies provided in ECDC Title 19 and the
state building and dangerous buildings codes
Version: SeptembeF4August 22, 20156
J
a
z
u=
0
M
O
U
0
U
W
r
Q
Packet Pg. 176
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Chapter 18.30
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Sections:
18.30.000Purpose Purposes.
18.30.010 Definitions.
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
18.30.030 Applicability.
18.30.040 Exemptions.
18.30.050 Administration.
18.30.050 Pr-eje,.t elassifieatien.
18.30.060 S*afm water management requirements Requirements.
18.30.070 Exemptions, exeeptions, adjustments and appeal Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeal.
18.30.080 E^^^m^p'^, deeds, Access and eaveaan4sCovenants.
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and „ aipAenanee r-e Maintenance Roles and
respensibilitiesR
18.30.100 Enforcement pfocedufesProcedures.
18.30.000 Pu-rposePurposes.
Page 1/30
existing storm water systems that directly or indireetly discharge to the eivy storm water A. To set forth
standards for managing stormwater runoff from construction and development sites to minimize:
1. Degradation of surface water quality by controlling the scouring and sedimentation of creeks, streams,
wetlands, ponds, lakes, other water bodies.
2. Degradation of groundwater quality.
3. Damage to adjacent and other downstream private properties from erosion or other impacts from stormwater
runoff.
4. Damage of City -owned parcels, City roads, rights -of -way and associated infrastructure.
B. To comply with requirements in ^ manner that oomplies with the Wester Washington -the Phase II National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit as issued by the Washington State
Department of Ecology.- (Ecology).
C. To complement site planning activities that minimize:
1. Impervious surfaces area.
The--, Ed-m-offlids City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, ffe, eurreat Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 177
7.3.c
Edmonds
Chapter 19.30 STORM AL TER NIAN GENILINT
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
2. The loss of native or non-native site vegetation.
3. The generation of stormwater runoff.
Page 2/30
D. To make low impact development (LID) the preferred and commonly used approach to site development; to require
LID be considered at the site planning stage; and to implement LID BMPs unless they are infeasible.
E. To i3r-avide for- insi3eetion aad maifAeaa-nee ef ster-m,�A,ater facilities in the e4v te easttr-e that these f4eilities Derfor
F: To require that all p. lie and pr-iv. e s*e: w er ��publicly-owned and privately -owned Stormwater
Treatment and Flow Control best management practices (BMPs)/Facilities are operated, maintained, and repaired in a
manner that conforms to this chapter.
G. To establish the mininium standards that must be met for oomplianee,
14F. To provide ^^ the authority for all—Mhethe City to inspect privately -owned Stormwater Treatment and
maintain sta f... wa4er- f eili Flow Control BMPs/Facilities.
G. To provide enforcement procedures for ensuring compliance with this chapter.
18.30.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
L`Arterial. A road or street primarily for through traffic. The term generally includes roads or streets considered
collectors. It does not include local access roads which are generally limited to providing access to abutting property
See also RCW 35.78.010, RCW 36.86.070, and RCW 47.05.021.
Adjustment. A variation in the application of a minimum requirement to a particular project. Adjustments
provide substantially equivalent environmental protection.
L`Applicant" means the. The owning individual(s) or corporations or their representatives applying for the permits or
approvals described in this chapter.
L'Approval. The proposed work or completed work conforming to this chapter as approved by the public
works direetefDirector or their designee.
"Best management practice (BN4P)" means the sehe ulepractices (BMPs). The schedules of activities,
prohibitienprohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and structural and/or managerial practices approved by
the 64yCity that, when used singly or in combination, prevent or reduce the release of pollutants and other adverse
impacts to waters of Washington State.
LBioretention. Engineered facilities that treat stormwater by passing it through a specified soil profile, and either retain
or detain the treated stormwater for flow attenuation. Refer to the 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington (SWMMWW), Chapter 7 of Volume V for bioretention BMP types and design specifications.
Category 1 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.l through No.S. See ECDC 18.30.60.C.
Category 2 Project Site. A project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.I through No.9. See ECDC 18.30.60.C.
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL). An individual who has current certification through an
approved erosion and sediment control training program that meets the minimum training standards established by
Ecology (see BMP C160 in the SWMMWW). A CESCL is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion
and sediment control. The CESCL must have the skills to assess site conditions and construction activities that could
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, are--, e_-,urremt ffi-r-ough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 178
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 3/30
impact the quality of stormwater and, the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the
quality of stormwater discharges. Certification is obtained through an Ecology approved erosion and sediment control
course. Course listings are provided online at Ecology's website.
City's municipal separate storm sewer system'—' or "MS4 ."A conveyance or system of conveyances
(including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or
storm drains) that are owned or operated by the eityCity of Edmonds, designed or used for collecting or conveying
ovate stormwater, and are not a combined sewer nor part of a publicly owned treatment works as defined in 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 122.2, and which is defined as "large" or "medium" or "small" or otherwise
designated by Ecology pursuant to 40 CFR 122.26.
"Clearing" means the act. The destruction and removal of vegetation, including grubbing. by
manual, mechanical, or chemical methods.
L'Commercial Agriculture. Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2) and activities involved
in the production of crops or livestock for commercial trade. An activity ceases to be considered commercial
agriculture when the area on which it is conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or has lain idle
for more than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation program, or unless the
activity is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an existing and ongoing
agricultural activity.
Common plan of development or sale" means a. A site where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may
takebe taking place at different times on different schedules and/or by different contractors, but still under a single
plan. For example! „hale Examples include: 1) phase projects and projects with multiple filings or lots, even if the
separate phases or filings/lots will be constructed under separate contract or by separate owners (e.g., a development
where lots are sold to separate builders); 2) a development plan that may be phased over multiple years, but is still
under a consistent plan for long-term development; ef3) projects in a contiguous area that may be unrelated but still
under the same contract, such as construction of a building extension and a new parking lot at the same facility; and 4)
linear projects such as roads, pipelines, or utilities. If the project is part of a common plan of development or sale, the
disturbed area of the entire plan must be used in determine permit requirements.
,>
means land disturbing operations including elearing, grading, or excavation that disturbs
"Converted pervious sur?aee" means-t evegetation (areas). The change in land cover changed from native vegetation,
pasture scrub/shrub, or unmaintained non-native vegetation to lawn, lands ape, or landscaped areas, or where native
vegetation is converted to pasture -areas.
L'Creeks. Is synonymous with "stfeastreams," which is defined in ECDC 23.40.005320.
"Critical areas" is defined in I CDC 23.40.005.
"Design stora' means a rainfall event or pattern of events for use in analyzing and designing drainage faeilities.
"Deten4ion" means a f4eility fer eapArelling sterm wmer ruflog for a preseribed design sterm and releasing the Storm
water at a preseribed rate
LDetention facility. An above or below ground facility, such as a pond or tank, that temporarily stores stormwater
runoff and subsequently releases it at a slower rate than it is collected by the drainage facility system. There is little or
no infiltration of stored stormwater.
Development. Land -disturbing activities, including Class IV general forest practices that are conversions from timber
land to other uses. Creation or addition of hard surfaces, or replacement of hard surface that is not part of a routine
maintenance activity. Structural development, including construction, installation, replacement, or expansion of a
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode -are eurrent Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 179
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 4/30
building or other structure. Subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and applied in Chapter
58.17 RCW
Director" means the public works aireete . The City's Public Works and Utilities Director or a designee with an
appropriate background in engineering or another related discipline.
"Discharge point. The location where a discharge leaves the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) through
the City's MS4 facilities/BMPs designed to infiltrate.
Ecology. The Washington State Department of Ecology.
"Effective impervious surface. Those impervious surfaces that are connected via sheet flow or discrete
conveyance to a drainage system including the ciy's N4S4.. Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are
considered ineffective if: 1) the runoff is dispersed through at least 100 feet of native vegetation in accordance with
BMP T5.30 — "Full Dispersion," as described in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the Star -.water Management N4an....1 f r
Westo..., Washington (2005) SWMMWW; 2) residential roof runoff is infiltrated in accordance with downspout Full
Infiltration Systems in BMP T5.10A in Volume III of the SWMMWW; or 3) approved continuous runoff modeling
methods indicate the entire runoff file is infiltrated.
"Erosion" means the displaeement of any earffi material or existing vegetation by rainfall, storm water runoff-, or
seepage.
"Erodible or leachable materials. Wastes, chemicals, or other substances that measurably alter the physical or
chemical characteristics of runoff when exposed to rainfall. Examples include erodible soils that are stockpiled,
uncovered process wastes, manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage dumpster leakage.
Erosion. The wearing away of the land surface by running water, wind, ice, or other geological agents, including such
processes as gravitational creep. Also, detachment and movement of soil or rock fragments by water, wind, ice, or
gravity. See the SWMMWW Glossary for examples of types of water erosion.
Excavation'=. The mechanical removal of dearth material.
°`Exceptions Relief from the application of a minimum requirement to a project.
L'Fi11!Lmeans-a. A deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.
L'Groundwater. Water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the land surface or below a water body.
"Hard surface. An impervious surface, a permeable pavement, or a vegetated roof.
Highway. A main public road connecting towns and cities. In Edmonds, this includes State HighwayRoute
99, State Route 524, and portions of State Highwa 104, beththat are classified as principal arterials in the
citylsCity's comprehensive transportation plan.
L'Illicit discharge" ea y. Any direct or indirect ,meta.- . , ate non-stormwater discharge to the eitylsCity's
MS4, groundwaters, or a water body, except as expressly allowed by ECDC Chapter 7.200EGG.
"Impervious surface. A non -vegetated surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into
the soil mantle as' sunder natural conditions prior to development, res'a ing it ste . A non -vegetated surface
area which causes water Ito run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow eempare
to s*a-n Water- ....ne ff,.>,.,..aete -isti s from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common
impervious surfaces include4, but are not limited to) rooftops, roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or
storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces
that similarly impede the natural infiltration of stafm wate stormwater. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities
. Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 180
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 5/30
shall not be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of determining whether the thresholds for application of
minimum requirements are exceeded. However-, epeeOpen, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall be
considered impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. Outdoor swimming pools shall be considered
impervious surfaces in all situations. In addition, lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, and other areas that
have modified runoff characteristics resulting from the addition of underdrains and impermeable or low permeability
liners are to be considered impervious surfaces. If no liner is installed, these areas (lawns, landscaping, sports fields,
golf courses, etc.) served by underdrains may be considered pervious if the underdrain is set a minimum of 8 inches
above the in -situ soils in a manner to allow infiltration over the facility bottom.
"Lake" means an. An inland body of fresh water surrounded by land.
"Land -disturbing activity. Any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil
cover (both vegetative and nonvegetat ve) non -vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land -disturbing
activities include but are not limited to demolition, clearing, grading, filling, and excavation. Compaction that is
associated with stabilization of structures and road construction shall also be considered a land -disturbing activity.
Vegetation maintenance practices, including landscape maintenance and gardening, are not considered
land -disturbing activity. Stormwater facility maintenance is not considered land disturbing activity if conducted
according to established standards and procedures.
L'Low impact development" means deve opm^ff* ean"eted in a ...a (LID). A stormwater and land use strategy that
seeksto ^' Aely prevent alterations to the Natural ydrologystrives to mimic pre -disturbance
hydrologic processes of the infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and transpiration by emphasizing conservation,
use of on -site. Low impaot deve opmen4 includes features, site planning and design to redue^ alterations of natural soil
and vegetati nme imperviouss surkwes,, and specifiedistributed stormwater management practices that
help to replieme aa�ur l hydrology stiek asare integrated into a project design.
LID Best Management Practices (BMPs). Distributed stormwater management practices, integrated into a project
design, that emphasize pre -disturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and
transpiration. LID BMPs include, but are not limited to, bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavements, s,
ail amend en4s bioretenti^n systems, ^^a roof downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal
excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water re -use.
LID principles. Land use management strategies that emphasize conservation, use of on -site natural features, and site
planning to minimize impervious surfaces, native vegetation loss, and stormwater runoff.
"Maintenance. Repair and maintenance activities conducted on currently serviceable structures,
facilities, and equipment that involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing; and results in no
significant adverse hydrologic impact. It includes those usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation
in the use of structures and systems. Those usual activities may include replacement of dysfunctional facilities,
including cases where environmental permits require replacing an existing structure with a different type structure, as
long as the functioning characteristics of the original structure are not changed. One example is the replacement of a
collapsed, fish blocking, round culvert with a new box culvert under the same span, or width, of roadway. In regard to
stormwater facilities, maintenance includes assessment to ensure ongoing proper operation, removal of built up
pollutants (i.e., sediments), replacement of failed or failing treatment media, and other actions taken to correct defects
as identified in the maintenance standards of Chapter 4, Volume V of the SWMMWW.
"Maximum ex4ent feasible" means the requirement is to be fully implemented, constrained only by the physical
limitations of the site, practical eonsiderations of engineering design, and reasonable considerations of financial eosts
and environmental ^tom
"Maximum extent practicable (MEP). Refers to paragraph 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act which
reads as follows: Permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers shall require controls to reduce the discharge of
pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and system,
design, and engineering methods, and other such provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate
for the control of such pollutants.
The--, Edmonds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 181
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
MS4" means the eity s. The City's municipal separate storm sewer system.
Page 6/30
`Native vegetation" fneans vegeta . Vegetation comprised of plant species4, other than noxious weeds), indigenous
to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest which could have been reasonably expected to occur naturally on the
site. Examples include trees such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big -leaf maple, and vine
maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam
flower, and fireweed.
L'Natural drainage systems and outfalls=mean the. The location of the channels, swales, and other
neffmanmadenon-manmade conveyance systems as defined by the earliest documented topographic contours existing
for the subject property, either from maps or photographs, or such other means as appropriate.
plans,'!New development" means land disturbing aetivities, ineluding Class 13.1 general forest praetiees that are eonver-sio
from timber land to other uses per RCW 76 09.050; stvdetural development, ineluding eonstruetion or installation of
building er- at -her struetufe; er-eation of impetwiiaus swir-A-estes; and s4division, sheft s4division, and binding site
as defined and applied in Chapter- 58.17 R-CW. Pr-ojeets meeting the deAnition of redevelopment shali not be
nsiderea new devel pme . Outfall. A point source as defined by 40 CFR 122.2 at the point where a discharge leaves
the City's MS4 and enters a surface receiving waterbody or surface receiving waters. Outfall does not include pipes,
tunnels, or other conveyances which connect segments of the same stream or other surface waters and are used to
convey primarily surface waters (i.e., culverts).
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs. A synonym for Low Impact Development BMPs.
Permeable pavement. Pervious concrete, porous asphalt, permeable pavers or other forms of pervious or porous
paving material intended to allow passage of water through the pavement section. It often includes an aggregate base
that provides structural support and acts as a stormwater reservoir.
Pervious Surface. Any surface material that allows stormwater to infiltrate into the ground. Examples include lawn,
landscape, pasture, native vegetation areas, and permeable pavements.
Person. Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal
corporation, agency of the state, or City government unit, however designated.
Pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS). Those hard surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in
stormwater runoff. See the listing of surfaces under pollution -generating impervious surface.
Pollution -generating impervious surface (PGIS). Those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant source of
pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to: vehicular use; industrial activities
(as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or
chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall; metal roofs unless they are coated with
an inert, non -leachable material (e.g., baked -on enamel coating); or roofs that are subject to venting significant
amounts of dusts, mists, or fumes from manufacturing, commercial, or other indoor activities.
Pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS). Any non -impervious surface subject to vehicular use, industrial
activities (as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); or storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes,
or chemicals, and that receive direct rainfall or run-on or blow-in of rainfall, use of pesticides and fertilizers, or loss of
soil. Typical PGPS include permeable pavement subject to vehicular use, lawns, and landscaped areas including: golf
courses, parks, cemeteries, and sports fields (natural and artificial turf).
Pre -developed condition. The native vegetation and soils that existed at a site prior to the influence of Euro-American
settlement. The pre -developed condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover unless reasonable, historic
information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement.
Project site. That portion of a property, properties, and/or right-of-way subject to land -disturbing activities, new hard
surfaces, or replaced hard surfaces. For projects that involve land disturbing activity on one or more parcels and land
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, -are, eurremit 0hrough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 182
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 7/30
disturbing activity in the City right-of-way, the "Project site" includes all areas of land disturbance. If the project is
part of a common development plan or sale, the disturbed area of the entire plan shall be used in determining permit
requirements.
_ ---- __1 r-
- r t __._ __, ------------, -a
_ __, t __ ... , r-�
� _- ---r-
corporation, ageneystate, of the or
cc
local unit,overnment however designated.
impeFvieus
0prepeAies, er righ4 ef way subjeet
if the is
te land disturbinge
development
new
th-e
or replaeed
disihar-h-ed the
surfaees. projeet part of
be in deter
a eommon
is disehafged
plan or sale,
wrea of entire plan shall
"Reeeiving
used -mining permit requiremen4s.
to
waters" means water-bedies
setffee of st,.rm water „ via sheet
or- stwfaee wa4er- systems whiek suffaee
flew.
Funeff
via a point
L'Rain garden. A non -engineered shallow landscaped depression, with compost -amended native soils and adapted
plants. The depression is designed to pond and temporarily store stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, and to allow
stormwater to pass through the amended soil profile.
Receiving waterbody or Receiving waters. Naturally and/or reconstructed naturally occurring surface water bodies,
such as creeks, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and marine waters, or groundwater, to which a MS4
discharges.
Replaced hard surface. For structures means the removal and replacement of hard surfaces down to the foundation. For
other hard surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and replacement.
Replaced impervious surface" means, fo. For structures, the removal and replacement of any exterior impervious
surfaces erdown to the foundation. For other impervious surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base
course and replacement. For- sites with existifig single family dwelling units (as defined in ECDC 2 i.90.080), a pr-64ec4
shall not be eensidered replaeed impei=Aeus sur-faee fer- the purposes of this ehapter-, unless the pr-ejeet site has one aer-e
in this seetien-.)
"`Roadway" means the traveled imper-..;,.. Traveled hard surface portion of any public or private road or street.
L'Road-related project. A project that all of, or the majority of, the new or replaced hard surface consist of roadway,
shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, or walkways, either publicly or privately funded.
Runoff. Water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers, streams,
springs, seeps, ponds, lakes and wetlands, as well as shallow ground water. It also means the portion of rainfall or
other precipitation that becomes surface flow and interflow.
Site. The area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels of land that is (are) subject to
development er redo elepment. For road projects, or utility projects in the right-of-way, the length of the project site
and the right-of-way boundaries define the site.
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, ffe, eurreat Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 183
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 8/30
L'Slope''—means the. The degree of slaetdeviation of a surface from the horizontal; measured as a numerical ratio,
percent, or in degrees. Expressed as a ratio, the first number is the horizontal distance (run) and the second is the
vertical distance (rise), as 2:1. A 2:1 slope is a 50 percent slope. Expressed in degrees, the slope is the angle from the
horizontal plane, with a 90-degree slope being vertical (maximum) and 45 degrees being a 1:1 or 100 percent slope.
"Soil1Lmeanie. The unconsolidated mantlemineral and organic material on the intermediate surface of the earth that
serves as a natural medium for the growth of land plants.
L'Source control" eans BMPs. A structure or operation that is intended to prevent pollutants from coming into
contact with storm water through physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that are sources of
pollutants. The SWMMWW separates source control BMPs into two types. Structural source control BMPs are
physical, structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to prevent pollutants from entering
stormwater. Operational BMPs are non-structural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants from entering
stormwater. See Volume IV of the SWMMWW for details.
Stormwater facility. A constructed component of a storm wate stormwater drainage system,
designed and constructed to perform a particular function or multiple functions. Storm wme facilities
include, but are not limited to, pipes, pwnpiag systeffis-,swales, ditches, culverts, street gutters, ^a'e'�detention
basins -,ponds, retention ponds, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices, catch basins, oil/water separators, and
^lluta * removal devices.biofiltration swales.
"Storm waterStormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). The Washington State
Department of Ecology's 2012 (as amended in 2014) Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.
Referred to as the 2014 SWMMWW.
Stormwater site plan. The comprehensive report and rise iatea pop containing all of the technical
information and analysis necessary for * regulatory agencies to evaluate a proposed new development er-
redevelopmen* project for compliance with staffn wa4e stormwater requirements. Contents of the storm ,, a4ef site
planStormwater Site Plan will vary with the type and size of the project, and individual site characteristics. It
may-
includeincludes a constmetion storm water pollution prevention plan (contra ^^Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (Construction SWPPP) and a permanent storm water ^^^*rol I' Permanent Stormwater Control Plan
(PSC plarr}Plan). Guidance on preparing a Stormwater Site Plan is contained in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the
SWMMWW.
L'Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/Facilities. Detention facilities, treatment BMPs/facilities,
bioretention, vegetated roofs, and permeable pavements that help meet Minimum Requirements No.6 (Treatment),
Minimum Requirement No.7 (Flow Control), or both as described in ECDC 18.30.060.
Threshold discharge area�n. An on -site area that drains to either a single natural discharge location or multiple
natural discharge locations that combine within one -quarter mile downstream (as determined by the shortest
flowpath). The examples below and in Figure 2-G.1 presented in Volume I of the S*^.....water Ma-aagefnei . Mai+u.' f r
Weston. Washington (2005)SWMMWW illustrate this definition. The purpose of this definition is to clarify how the
thresholds of this code are applied to project sites with multiple discharge points.
. Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 184
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 9/30
Example of a Site with a
Example of a Site with
Example of a Site with
Single Natural Discharge
Multiple Natural
Multiple Natural Discharges
and a SingleThreshold
Discharges and a Single
and Multiple Threshold
Discharge Area
Threshold Discharge Area
Discharge Areas
Natural
•'•
-Natural Natural
N44al Natural
bischarge-
;Discharger•_
Discharge-..-- discharge-----• -.-
�ischgge Y.
-- Area
Area 1 Area 2
Area 1 Area 2
THRESHOLD
DFSOHARGE
— ---THRE HOLD
HRES11OLD THRESHGL
DISCWR
r', AREA.,
CSC ARG�.--
15CHAFZGE
r
(Shaded)ti4
A FA-
AREA i,, AAEA 2
I add
Natural
i Natural —
Natural
f Discharge
Discharge
Discharge
Location
Location
•i =
Location F
i
1
'ti
4 f
� �
r
Y. Mile Downstream - ------------------------+-----------------
fshorlest flow pathl
jy
Vehicular Use. Regular use of an impervious or pervious surface by motor vehicles. The following are subject to
regular vehicular use: roads, un-vegetated road shoulders, bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway, driveways,
parking lots, unrestricted access fire lanes, vehicular equipment storage yards, and airport runways.
The following are not considered subject to regular vehicular use: paved bicycle pathways separated from and not
subject to drainage from roads for motor vehicles, restricted access fire lanes, and infrequently used maintenance
access roads.
Waterbody. Surface waters including rivers, streams, lakes, marine waters, estuaries, and wetlands.
Waters of the state. Includes those waters defined as "waters of the United States" in 40 CFR Subpart 122.2
within the geographic boundaries of Washington State, and "waters of the state" as defined in Chapter 90.48 RCW
which includes lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters and all other surface
waters and water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington.
°`Wetlands —are as. As defined in ECDC 23.40.005. [Ord. 37924026 § 1—,204-0 (Att. A), 2016].
18.30.020 Authority and Regulation.
A. The public works aireeter or ^ desig e-ePublic Works and Utilities Director shall administer this chapter and shall
be referred to as the d-ireeterDirector.
B. The direeterDirector shall have the authority to develop -and, implement, and enforce policies and procedures to
administer and enforce this chapter.- per ECDC 18.30.110 and 18.30.120, such as the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
The--, Edmonds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode -are eurrent Glar-ough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 185
7.3.c
Edmonds Page 14,114
Edmonds Page 10/30
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
O
E
M
O
th this tef. r�3-792 1, 2010].
>
-e1 §
C
�E
This chapter applies if .,,y of the following pertains to a site:
0
E
1. issuance of a city permit is required under all other chapters of ECDC
Title 18 or . E
O
a 2.C. A iS SUbMitted p D 2 75
v
sea
3•
C
proposed project:
p
O
E
a. involves 500 square feet or more of land distff-bing aetivity,
new impervious surfaee, or replaeed 'a
Title 23) farming be
++
there is the for
and ongoing or gardening aetivities shall
exeluded unless potenfial sueh
Q
b. is 500
lineal feet treneh d
a utility or other eonstmetion projeet consisting of
or more of excavation.
O
area buffer.
C
d
E
This ehaptef applies to aetions whenever the difeeteF deteffflines there
is a potential d
R
of C
'
' IC
2. Aviolation federal laws,
to
of applieable city, state, or regulations,
or permits related water quality. L
if has been issued
R
for in (A)
a city permit or a subdivision appheation submitted
a site, as provided subsection of -
is the this be
those if the triggered i
seetion, requirements of ehapter shall administered under
permits. site aetivities
E
bseetion this do issued
the this be O
(A)(3) or (B) of section not neeessitate a eity
permit, requirements of ehapter shall
The requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements. They do not replace, repeal, abrogate, supersede, or
Ln
W
affect any other more stringent requirements, rules, regulations, covenants, standards, or restrictions. Where this
chapter imposes requirements that are more protective of human health or the environment than those set forth
c
elsewhere, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. When this chapter imposes requirements that are less protective
w
of human health or the environment than those set forth elsewhere, the provisions of the more protective requirements
shall prevail.
m
c
ED. The director shall have the authority to impose additional requirements that apply te on a project or site
�
will diffe o meet the purpose of this chapter based on {site -specific factors including, but are -not limited to}—
�
following: p eet scope and , fig r.,tio physical site ,a,,,racteristies site location and conditions.-
o
18.30.050. stelz ...,tor ffl o eI4 ro 0 e is ., e ,less fibed i ECDC; 1 0 3n 06n slope, and designated use.
U
EE. Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws, nor do
W
they indicate compliance with any other laws. Compliance is still required with all applicable federal, state and local
,
laws and regulations, including rules promulgated under authority of this chapter.
�" �
2
GF. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all impacts to the environment. Thus,
c
d
E
compliance with this chapter should not be construed as mitigating all drainage water or other environmental impacts,
and additional mitigation may be required to protect the environment pursuant to other applicable laws and
M
Q
regulations. The primary obligation for compliance with this chapter and for preventing environmental harm on or
from property is placed upon the applicant. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
m
E
Q
. Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 186
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 11/30
1 ,30,030 Applicability,
i�30.0 4 0-Y7cd MiHxStf-atieir.
A. This chapter applies to applications submitted on or after January 1, 2017 and applications submitted prior to
January 1, 2017, which have not started construction by January 1, 2022.
This chapter applies
A. Appliemians. All storm water- review submit4als shall eantain, in addition to the infer-mation r-equired under- a -ay
other applieable city code, a storm water site plan as deseribed in the storm water- supplemen4 (see ECDC 18.30.060)
and other infer-mation as the director- shall . .
B. to the following actions on sites that discharge to the City's MS4 or discharges to waters of the state whether or
not a City -issued permit is required:
1. The d reefer shall review all plansfor o „1:.,nee with this ,.L.apter
projeets for approval at various stages of the work to determine that they are being constFueted per the
approved storm water site plans. Stages of work requiring inspeetion include (but are not limited to)
preeonstmetion, installation fBN4n land Land -disturbing aetivities installation ofti lities landseapingT-
and
ehapter or to eomply with loeal, state or fedeFal law or regulation on storm water-, a speeial inspeetion or
testing shall be performed. The drainage system shall be installed eoneurrently with site development a
shall be eempleted as shwA% on the approved plan befer-e eity appFeval of an eeetipaney per-mit of final
inspeetion.activity, or
D2. Creation of new hard surfaces, or
3. Replacement of existing hard surfaces, or
4. Conversion of pervious surfaces, or
5. New connections to the City's MS4, or
6. Any other actions that can increase the volu or rate of stormwater runoff, or cause the generation of
pollutants, from the site.
I I I----�------- --------
----------eeerae're:�eer+�si��!erssriiTifri�s���!* �f�r�teyc.Ts�
18.30.050 Projeet elassil0eat-ion.
For puiposes of this ehapter, projeets are eiassified as large site, small site, or minor site as deseribed below, primarily
based on the extent of land disturbing aetivities.
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, -are, eurremit Ular-ough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Attachment 3 - ECDC 18.30-Redline Version (1465 : Stormwater Management Code Update, Edmonds Community Development
7.3.c
Edmonds Page 14,114
Edmonds Page 13/30
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
4)
E
la.
O
N,.SSN4RNe.5 On Site StefmwateFNUnagemefit;
2
d
vi. SSN4R No. 7 Flow Centrol. This SSN4R may be waived
by the director- based on the extent
of C
appheation of SSN4R No. 5 to infiltrate, disperse, and retain
storm water nmoff on site without
causing-
flooding or erosion impaet, per the criteria in the storm
water s"pleme
E
vii. SSN4R No 8 Wetland Preteetion;
E
O
v}i}. �Slbll?c lye.
V
C
.
E
W
++
landseaped
,of,
!Z
d
O
i. SSN4R Ne 1 Prep..,•.,tie e f St...-.n...4er Site Plan;
C
Plan;
d
SSN4R No. 3 SoureeControl Pollution-,
n}. of
C
�
iv. cc>\aD Ne A Prmese.•ymie« „fN t..,•.,1 rlFaif age Systems ..,,.,1 Ott f 11s.
,
N,.SSN4RNe.5 Oa Site Stei4nwa4efManagement;
y+
v}. SSN4 TATo. 6 R-uneffe—me-nt;
E
L
O
vii. SW No '7 Fio=v` Gontre-lr,
ix. cc>\an No. 9 Opera m and 1\ ai tenan,.o.
,
C
1n Off Site n,,.,lysisMitigation;
O
x.cc>\anNo. and
V)
L
xi. SSN4R No. 11 Finaneial Liability.
>
Aay the SSN4Rs be by the dir-eetof
to the
e. or all of may required on a+ty small site pr-ejeet
based factors ineluding, but limited to, loeation,
meet pufpose-af
ehapter off site speeifie not soil
designated,
slope,this
eonditions,
Gi
c3.
O
M
Minof Site Pfejeets. The fellewing mini fi4s apply te fninof site projee
O
U
W
M
puTese ef this ehapter based en site speeifie faeters ineluding, W4 net lifnited to, laea4ioa, soil eeaditie*s-,
r+
slepe, anddesi-pmed use. r�3792 § 1, 2". d
E
s
M
70 Exemptions, e3keeptions, adjustments and appeal.Q
c
A. Full Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are exempt from the provisions of this
chapter:
The--, Edmonds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremat t-h-rough Ordinanee 4037, passed Q
. Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 189
7.3.c
Edmonds Page 14,114
Edmonds Page 14/30
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
1. Forest practices regulated under WAC Title 222, except for Class IV general forest practices that are
conversions from *��timberland to other uses, are exempt from the provisions of the minimum
requirements.
2. Commercial agriculture practices that involve working land for production are generally exempt. However,
land conversion from timberland to agriculture and the construction of impervious surfaces are not exempt.
3. Construction of drilling sites, waste management pits, and associated access roads, and construction of
transportation and treatment infrastructure such as pipelines, natural gas treatment plants, natural gas pipeline
compressor stations, and crude oil pumping stations are exempt. Operators are encouraged to implement and
maintain best management practices to minimize erosion and control sediment during and after construction
activities to help ensure protection of surface water quality during storm events.
4. Roadway Pr-oj The following readwaypavement maintenance practices or activities are exempt: pothole
and square -cut patching, overlaying existing asphalt or concrete pavement with asphalt or concrete without
expanding the area of coverage, shoulder grading, reshaping/regrading drainage systems, crack sealing,
resurfacing with in -kind material without expanding the road prism, ^pavement preservation
activities that do not expand the road prism, and vegetation maintenance.
a. For large site projects o ly *1t B. Partial Exemptions. The following land uses and land -disturbing activities are
partially exempt from the provisions of this chapter:
Underground utility projects that replace the ground surface with in -kind material or materials with similar
runoff characteristics are only subject to Minimum Requirement No. fead2, Construction Stormwater
Pollution Prevention. "I \
4-.2. The following pavement maintenance practices or activities are considered redevelopmen4development, and
therefore are not categorically exempt. The extent to which this exemption apphesthese requirements apply is
explained for each circumstance.
a. Removing and replacing a paved surface to base course or a lower level, or repairing the
feadwaypavement base: iflf impervious surfaces are not expanded, lafge site pr-ejeet mini
requirements No 1 throughMinimum Requirements No. 1 — No. 5 apply. However, i
- mob- ., _ t.-.I--------.---»----...1 - .... -, ____ - - _......_y .,��»��
required when the thresholds identified for development projects in ECDC 18.30.060 are met. Where
appropriate, project proponents are encouraged to look for opportunities to use permeable and porous
pavements.
b. i4—.Extending the pavement edge without increasing the size of the road prism or paving graveled
shoulders: these are considered new impervious surfaces and are subject to the minimum requirements
that are triggered when the thresholds identified for rr^a^velopme development projects in ECDC
18.30.060 are met.
c. ii4—.Resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, asphalt, or concrete; or upgrading from gravel to
asphalt or concrete; or upgrading from a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal') to asphalt or
concrete: these are considered new impervious surfaces and are subject to the minimum requirements
that are triggered when the thresholds identified for r-edev�development projects in ECDC
18.30.060 are met.
18.30.050 Administration.
A. Application, Submittals, and Review.
1. The Director shall review all plans and all other submittals required by ECDC 18.30.050.A.3 for compliance
with this chapter when:
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 190
7.3.c
Edmonds Page 14,114
Edmonds Page 15/30
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
a. An application for a City permit is required under all other chapters of ECDC Title 18 or 19, or
b. A subdivision application is submitted per ECDC 20.75.040.
2. In all other situations when actions under ECDC 18.30.030 apply to a project site, review shall be under a
Stormwater permit.
3. All stormwater review submittals shall contain, in addition to the information required under any other
applicable City code, a Stormwater Site Plan as described in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum (see
ECDC 18.30.060) and any other information required by the Director.
B. Inspections.
1. The Director shall inspect projects at various stages of the work to determine if they comply with the
requirements of this chapter, and enforcement actions shall be taken as necessary. These inspections will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Prior to site clearing and construction to assess site erosion potential, and
b. During construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment
controls and other approved plan components, and
c. All permanent stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities and catch basins in new
residential developments every six months until 90 percent of the lots are constructed (or when
construction is stopped and the site is fully stabilized) to identify maintenance needs and enforce
compliance with maintenance standards as needed, and
d. Upon completion of construction and prior to final approval to ensure proper installation of permanent
stormwater control facilities and verify that a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for
maintenance is assigned for stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities, and
e. Post -Construction inspections per ECDC 18.30.090.
2. When reasonably required by the Director to accomplish the purpose of this chapter or to comply with local,
state or federal law or regulation on stormwater, special inspection or testing shall be performed by the
applicant.
C. Fees. Application, review and inspection fees as set in ECDC Chapter 15.00 shall be paid.
18.30.060 Requirements.
A. Documents. The sources of the stormwater management requirements for the City are from the following
documents:
1. Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, Appendix 1, modification date January 16,
2015
2. 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)
3. The Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
In the event of conflicts between the various provisions, the more stringent provision shall apply.
B. Illicit Discharges and Connections. Non-stormwater illicit discharges, including spills, into the MS4,
groundwaters, or a water body from any developed or undeveloped lands are prohibited per ECDC Chapter 7.200.
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, ffe, eurreat Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 191
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
C. Thresholds and Applicability
Page 16/30
The thresholds outlined in this section are only applicable to ECDC 18.30.060.C. See also the Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum for supplemental information on thresholds.
a. All development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement No. 2.
b. Category 1 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
Category 1 includes projects that:
i. Result in 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Have land disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
c. Category 2 project sites shall comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9. Category 2
includes projects that:
i. Result in 5,000 square feet, or greater, of new plus replaced hard surface area, or
ii. Convert 0.75 acres, or more, of vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or
iii. Convert 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
4-.2. Additional Requirements for road -related projects. For road -related projects, runoff from the new hard
surfaces (including pavement, shoulders, curbs, and sidewalks) and the converted vegetation areas shall meet
all the minimum requirements if the new hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more. In addition, if the new
hard surfaces total 5,000 square feet or more and total 50 percent or more of the existing hard surfaces within
the project limits, runoff from the new and replaced hard surfaces and the converted vegetation areas shall
meet all the minimum requirements. The project limits shall be defined by the length of the project and the
width of the right-of-way.
D. Minimum Technical Requirements. This section describes the minimum technical requirements for stormwater
management at development sites.
1. Minimum Requirement No. 1 — Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans
The City shall require a Stormwater Site Plan from all projects meeting the thresholds in ECDC 18.30.060.C.
Stormwater Site Plans shall use site -appropriate development principles to retain native vegetation and
minimize impervious surfaces to the extent feasible. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance
with Chapter 3 of Volume 1 of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater
Addendum.
4-.2. Minimum Requirement No. 2 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention.. Plan (SWPPP)
a. Thresholds:
All development projects are responsible for preventing erosion and discharge of sediment and
other pollutants into receiving waters. Compliance with this minimum requirement can be
achieved for an individual site if the site is covered under Ecology's General NPDES Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities and fully implementing the
requirements of that permit.
ii. A Construction SWPPP is required for all projects which a) result in 2,000 square feet or more
of new plus replaced hard surface area, b) where a structure with an exterior hard surface area of
at least 2,000 square feet is being demolished, c) which disturb 7,000 square feet or more of
land, or d) when the site falls within the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area, Landslide
Hazard Area or steep slope critical area. Projects that do not meet any of the above criteria are
not required to prepare a Construction SWPPP, but must consider all of the elements listed
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, -are, eurremit 0hrough Ordinanee 4037, passed haly . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 192
7.3.c
Edmonds Page 14,114
Edmonds Page 17/30
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
below for Construction SWPPPs and develop controls for all Construction SWPPP elements
that pertain to the project site.
b. General Requirements:
The SWPPP shall include a narrative and drawings. All BMPs shall be clearly referenced in the
narrative and marked on the drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation to
explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for the project. Each of the thirteen
elements referenced below must be considered and included in the SWPPP unless site
conditions render the element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly
justified in the narrative of the SWPPP.
ii. Clearing and grading activities for developments shall be permitted only if conducted pursuant
to an approved site development plan (e.g., building permit, subdivision approval) that
establishes permitted areas of clearing, grading, cutting, and filling. These permitted clearing
and grading areas and any other areas required to preserve critical or sensitive areas, buffers,
native growth protection easements, or tree retention areas as required by the City, shall be
delineated on the site plans and the development site.
iii. The SWPPP shall be implemented beginning with initial land disturbance and until final
stabilization. Sediment and Erosion control BMPs shall be consistent with the BMPs contained
in Chapter 4 of Volume II of the SWMMWW.
c. Seasonal Work Limitations:
From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities may only be
authorized by the City if it can be demonstrated that silt -laden runoff will be prevented from leaving the
site through a combination of the following:
Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil type, and proximity to
receiving waters; and
ii. Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and
iii. Proposed erosion and sediment control measures, in accordance with ECDC 18.30.060.D.2.d
below.
Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the City may expand or restrict the
seasonal limitation on site disturbance. The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing
and grading limitations, except for sites lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide
hazard area as defined by ECDC 19.10.020.F:
Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs,
ii. Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the soil
or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil, and
iii. Activities where there is one hundred percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the site
in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities.
d. Construction SWPPP Elements
Construction SWPPP elements are required in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.5.2 of
Volume I of the SWMMWW and the requirements in the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum
3. Minimum Requirement No. 3 — Source Control of Pollution
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, are--, e_-,urremt Glar-ough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 193
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 18/30
All known, available and reasonable source control BMPs must be required for all projects approved by the
City. Source control BMPs must be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with Volume IV of the
SWMMWW. All single family residential projects shall, at a minimum, incorporate required BMPs from
SWMMWW Volume IV, S411 — BMPs for Landscaping and Lawn/Vegetation Management.
4. Minimum Requirement No. 4 — Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls
Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained, and discharges from the project site shall occur at the natural
location, to the maximum extent practicable. The manner by which runoff is discharged from the project site
must not cause a significant adverse impact to downstream receiving waters and down gradient properties.
The discharge must have an identified overflow route that is safe and certain, and leads to the ultimate outfall
location (such as a receiving water or municipal drainage system). All outfalls require energy dissipation.
To demonstrate compliance with this core requirement, all projects shall submit an off -site qualitative
analysis. If an existing problem (or potential future problem after development) is identified, mitigation will
be required to prevent worsening of that problem. A quantitative analysis may be required for any project
deemed to need additional information or where the project proponent or the City determines that a
quantitative analysis is necessary to evaluate the off -site impacts or the capacity of the conveyance system.
See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on complying with this requirement.
5. Minimum Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management
a. Applicability:
On -site Stormwater Management BMPs are required in accordance with the following project
thresholds, standards, and lists to infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff on -site to the extent
feasible without causing flooding or erosion impacts. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater
Addendum for additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
b. Project Thresholds:
There are five project scenarios outlined below that determine the applicability of Minimum
Requirement No. 5 — On -site Stormwater Management. The first four scenarios apply to projects that
discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4. The fifth scenario applies to project discharges that do
not enter the City's MS4. Note that more than one of the five scenarios may apply to a given project:
Retrofit. Projects that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and that contain
existing hard surfaces on the parcel or common plan of development that do not drain to an
approved stormwater management facility are required to provide On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs to manage a portion of those existing hard surfaces that will remain after
project completion. BMPs from List No.I (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d) shall be applied to a
minimum of 25 percent of those existing unmanaged surfaces, but to no more than the area
equal to the proposed new plus replaced hard surfaces.
Only for those existing unmanaged hard surfaces that remain after project completion,
applicants are not required to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility for
these existing surfaces (as is required under ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b [ii] and [iii] below).
However, if it is determined that the minimum 25 percent requirement cannot be met due to
BMP infeasibility, documentation of BMP infeasibility is required. In addition, when runoff
from exiting unmanaged hard surfaces is mixed with runoff from new plus replaced hard
surfaces, those BMPs must be selected and designed in accordance with the requirements for
management of new plus replaced hard surfaces (per sections [ii] and [iii] below). See the
SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details on On -site
Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
The--, Edmonds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 194
7.3.c
Edmonds
Chapter 19.30 STORM ALATER MANAGEMENT
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 19/30
ii. Category 1. Category 1 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and
are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.1 for all new plus replaced hard
surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iii. Category 2. Category 2 project sites that discharge directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 and
are required to comply with Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9 (per ECDC
18.30.060.C) shall either:
a. Use On -site Stormwater Management BMPs from List No.2 for all new plus replaced
hard surfaces and land disturbed (See ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.e); or
b. Demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard (See ECDC
18.30.060.D.5.c). Projects selecting this option cannot use rain gardens. They may choose
to use bioretention BMPs as described in the SWMMWW.
iv. Direct Discharge Requirement. Projects that discharge directly to Puget Sound through the
City's MS4 (in accordance with the restrictions applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound
presented in Section 2.5.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW) do not have to achieve the LID
Performance Standard, nor consider bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavement, or full
dispersion, but must meet the following:
a. Projects must implement BMP T5.13 (Post -Construction Soil Quality & Depth); BMPs
T5.I OA Downspout Full Infiltration Systems, T5.1 OB Downspout Dispersion Systems, or
T5.1 OB Perforated Stub -out Connections; and BMP T5.11 Concentrated Flow Dispersion
or T5.12 Sheet Flow Dispersion; if feasible for all new plus replaced hard surfaces and
land disturbed. See the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for
additional details on On -site Stormwater Management BMP infeasibility.
b. Edmonds Way specific requirements. After applying the requirements in item (a) above,
for all remaining project site runoff (e.g., from unmanaged surfaces, or from overflow
from on -site BMPs), the post -development 10-, and 100-year recurrence interval peak
flows shall not exceed, 0.25 and 0.45 cubic feet per second per acre of impervious surface
area, respectively. See the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum for additional details.
V. Projects that do not drain directly or indirectly to the City's MS4 are required to implement one
of the following:
a. Project sites may discharge to the downstream private property (e.g., projects located
above BNSF property) with approval from the downstream property owner(s).
b. Project sites may discharge runoff to an on -site system.
For sites located within earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, a geotechnical design, analysis, and report by a geotechnical
engineer is required for the on -site system. On -site Stormwater Management
BMPs from List No.I in ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.d shall be evaluated for all
new plus replaced hard surfaces and land disturbed. Projects are not required
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, ffe, eurreat t-la-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 195
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 20/30
to evaluate BMPs in priority order or document infeasibility. The project
applicant may be subject to an extra permit processing fee for City review of
the geotechnical analysis. Projects are required to comply with all other
applicable City requirements, such as ECDC 19.10 (earth subsidence and
landslide hazard areas).
ii. For sites located outside earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas or their
buffers, ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.ii and ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.iii shall be
followed to evaluate site appropriate BMP's.
Subject to prior approval by the City, project sites may pump on -site runoff to the City's
MS4. A quantitative downstream analysis in accordance with Minimum Requirement No.
4 and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum will be required. If the City's MS4 does not
have adequate capacity to receive the applicant's pumped flows, the applicant is required
to install an on -site detention system to store runoff and pump it to the MS4 at an
approved rate.
c. LID Performance Standard
For projects that elect to meet the LID Performance Standard to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii)
and (iii), stormwater discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations
for the range of pre -developed discharge rates from 8 percent of the 2-year peak flow to 50 percent of the
2-year peak flow from the project site. Refer to the Standard Flow Control Requirement section in
Minimum Requirement No. 7 for information about the assignment of the pre -developed condition.
Project sites that must also meet Minimum Requirement No. 7 shall match flow durations between 8
percent of the 2-year flow through the full 50-year flow.
d. List No.I for Category 1 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 5.
For projects that elect to use List No. 1 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (ii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW and the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum; and Competing Needs Criteria
listed in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Roofs:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW,
or Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.1 OA in Section 3.1.1 of
Volume III of the SWMMWW.
ii. Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14A in Chapter 5 of Volume V, or Bioretention in
accordance with Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or bioretention
facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the overflow which is at
least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
iii. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP TS.IOB in Section 3.1.2 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit t-la-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 196
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 21/30
iv. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP T5.1 OC in Section 3.1.3 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The City
may waive the requirement to install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum
Requirement #4, or available City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
Other Hard Surfaces:
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW
ii. Permeable Pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW, or Rain Gardens in accordance with BMP T5.14A in Chapter 5 of Volume V, or
Bioretention in accordance with Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW. The rain garden or
bioretention facility must have a minimum horizontal projected surface area below the
overflow which is at least 5 percent of the area draining to it.
iii. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
iv. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. The City
may waive the requirement to install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum
Requirement #4, or available City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
e. List No.2 for Category 2 project sites: On -site Stormwater Management BMPs for Projects Triggering
Minimum Requirements No. 1 through No. 9.
For projects that elect to use List No. 2 to comply with ECDC 18.30.060.D.b (iii), for each surface,
consider the BMPs in the order listed for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is considered
feasible. No other On -site Stormwater Management BMP is necessary for that surface. Feasibility shall
be determined by evaluation against design criteria, limitations, and infeasibility criteria identified for
each BMP in the SWMMWW; and Competing Needs Criteria listed in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
Lawn and landscaped areas:
Roofs:
Post -Construction Soil Quality and Depth in accordance with BMP T5.13 in Chapter 5 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW.
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW,
or Downspout Full Infiltration Systems in accordance with BMP T5.10A in Section 3.1.1 of
Volume III of the SWMMWW.
ii. Bioretention (See Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum
horizontally projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total
surface area draining to it.
iii. Downspout Dispersion Systems in accordance with BMP TS.IOB in Section 3.1.2 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
iv. Perforated Stub -out Connections in accordance with BMP T5.1 OC in Section 3.1.3 of Volume
III of the SWMMWW.
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit t-la-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 197
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 22/30
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. Note that if
the project is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to be installed
to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5. In addition, the City may waive the requirement to
install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum Requirement #4, or available
City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
Other Hard Surfaces:
Full Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.30 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW
ii. Permeable pavement in accordance with BMP T5.15 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the
SWMMWW.
iii. Bioretention (See Chapter 7 of Volume V of the SWMMWW) facilities that have a minimum
horizontally projected surface area below the overflow which is at least 5 percent of the total
surface area draining to it.
iv. Sheet Flow Dispersion in accordance with BMP T5.12, or Concentrated Flow Dispersion in
accordance with BMP T5.11 in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW.
V. Detention vaults or pipes in accordance with the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum. Note that if
the project is required to construct a flow control facility to comply with Minimum
Requirement No. 7 (per ECDC 18.30.060.D.7), a detention vault is not required to be installed
to meet Minimum Requirement No. 5. In addition, the City may waive the requirement to
install a detention vault if the downstream analysis in Minimum Requirement #4, or available
City data, indicate that peak flow control is not beneficial.
6. Minimum Requirement No. 6 — Runoff Treatment
a. Project Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider
those hard and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC 18.30.060.C.2.
For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and the converted
vegetation areas. The following require construction of stormwater treatment facilities:
Projects in which the total of pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS) is 5,000 square feet or
more in a threshold discharge area of the project, or
ii. Projects in which the total of pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS) — not including
permeable pavements — is 0.75 acres or more in a threshold discharge area, and from which
there will be a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site.
b. Treatment -Type Thresholds and Facility Sizing:
Treatment -Type Thresholds in accordance with Step 2 (Oil Control), Step 4 (Phosphorus
Treatment), Step 5 (Enhanced Treatment), and Step 6 (Basic Treatment) of Chapter 2, Section
2.1, Volume V of the SWMMWW. Phosphorus treatment shall be required for projects draining
to Hall Creek and Lake Ballinger.
ii. Treatment Facility Sizing, including Water Quality Design Storm Volume, Water Quality
Design Flow Rate, and Downstream Facilities, of Chapter 2, Section 2.5.6, Volume I of the
SWMMWW.
c. Treatment Facility Selection, Design, and Maintenance
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 198
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Stormwater treatment facilities shall be:
Page 23/30
Selected in accordance with the process identified in Chapter 4 of Volume I, and Chapter 2 of
Volume V of the SWMMWW,
ii. Designed in accordance with the design criteria in Volume V of the SWMMWW, and
iii. Maintained in accordance with the maintenance schedule in Volume V of the SWMMWW
d. Additional Requirements
The discharge of untreated stormwater from pollution -generating surfaces to ground water will not
be authorized by the City. All associated runoff must be treated using On -site Stormwater
Management BMPs designed to provide the required level of treatment in accordance with Chapter
5, Volume V and Chapter 7, Volume V of the SWMMWW; or by infiltration through soils meeting
the soil suitability criteria in Chapter 3 of Volume III of the SWMMWW.
Minimum Requirement No. 7 — Flow Control
a. Applicability: Flow control is required on projects meeting the thresholds summarized below to reduce
the impacts of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces and land cover conversions. Flow control in
accordance with Minimum Requirement No. 7 is not required for projects that discharge directly to, or
indirectly through the City's MS4 to Puget Sound (other minimum requirements may still apply). See
ECDC 18.30.060.D.5.b.iv and Section 2.5.7 of Volume I of the SWMMWW for additional restrictions
applicable to direct discharges to Puget Sound.
If the discharge drains to a stream that leads to a wetland, or to a wetland that has an outflow to a stream,
both this minimum requirement (Minimum Requirement No. 7) and Minimum Requirement No. 8
apply-
b. Thresholds: When assessing road -related projects against the following thresholds, only consider only
those impervious, hard, and pervious surfaces that are subject to this minimum requirement per ECDC
18.30.060.C.2. For all other projects, the requirements apply to the new plus replaced hard surfaces and
the converted vegetation areas. The following circumstances require achievement of the standard flow
control requirement for western Washington:
Projects in which the total of effective impervious surfaces is 10,000 square feet or more in a
threshold discharge area, or
ii. Projects that convert 0.75 acres or more of vegetation to lawn or landscape, or convert 2.5 acres
or more of native vegetation to pasture in a threshold discharge area, and from which there is a
surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site, or
iii. Projects that through a combination of hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas cause a
0.10 cubic feet per second (cfs) increase or greater in the 100-year flow frequency from a
threshold discharge area as estimated using the Western Washington Hydrology Model or other
approved model and one -hour time steps (or a 0.15 cfs increase or greater using 15-minute time
steps).
c. Standard Flow Control Requirement (applies to discharges directly or indirectly to the City's MS4,
except for projects that meet the direct discharge requirements outlined in "a" above): Stormwater
discharges shall match developed discharge durations to pre -developed durations for the range of
pre -developed discharge rates from 50 percent of the 2-year peak flow up to the full 50-year peak flow.
The pre -developed condition to be matched shall be a forested land cover unless reasonable, historic
information is available that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement (modeled as "pasture" in the
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, -are, eurremit 0hrough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 199
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 24/30
Western Washington Hydrology Model). This standard requirement is waived for sites that will reliably
infiltrate all the runoff from hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas.
d. Additional Requirement: Flow Control BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance
with Volume III of the SWMMWW or an approved equivalent.
8. Minimum Requirement No. 8 - Wetlands Protection
a. Applicability: The requirements below apply only to projects whose stormwater discharges into a
wetland, either directly or indirectly through a conveyance system.
b. Thresholds: The thresholds identified in Minimum Requirement No. 6 - Runoff Treatment, and
Minimum Requirement No. 7 - Flow Control shall also be applied to determine the applicability of this
requirement to discharges to wetlands.
c. Standard Requirement: Projects shall comply with Guide Sheets No. 1 through No. 3 in Appendix I-D of
the SWMMWW. The hydrologic analysis shall use the existing land cover condition to determine the
existing hydrologic conditions unless directed otherwise by a regulatory agency with jurisdiction.
d. Additional Requirements: Stormwater treatment and flow control facilities shall not be built within a
natural vegetated buffer, except for:
Necessary conveyance systems as approved by the City; or
ii. As allowed in wetlands approved for hydrologic modification or treatment in accordance with
Guide Sheet 2 in Appendix I-D of the SWMMWW.
An adopted and implemented basin plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 of
Appendix 1 of the Phase II NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit.
Minimum Requirement No. 9 - Operation and Maintenance6. With r-espeet to ~eplaeea e ff ees
SSN4R 8 (wetlands pr-eteetiea) (er- the asseeia4ed applieabl �_ir-emefAs for- lafge sites) should the
eity adopt a plan and sehedule that fialfills th ' . ts thr-aidg� - . I . nage eat+tr-el plan .,
via
An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions in Volume I and Volume V of the
SWMMWW is required for proposed Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control BMPs/facilities. The party (or
parties) responsible for maintenance and operation shall be identified in the operation and maintenance
manual. For private facilities approved by the City, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be
retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site, and shall be transferred with the property to the new
owner. For public facilities, a copy of the operation and maintenance manual shall be retained in the
appropriate department. A log of maintenance activity that indicates what actions were taken shall be kept
and be available for inspection.
18.30.070
13==Exceptions, Adjustments, and Appeals.
4—
A. Exceptions.
1. The dir-eete Director may approve a request for an exception to the minimum requirements of this chapter
following legal public notice of an application for an exception and of the Director's decision on
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 200
7.3.c
Edmonds Page 14,114
Edmonds Page 25/30
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
the application. All legal public notice related to this request for an exception shall be in the manner
prescribed in ECDC 20.03.002 and the applicant shall pay all costs to publish the legal public notices
required by this provision. The director Director shall provide and keep written findings of fact of the
decision.
The approval of the exception shall only be granted when the applicant demonstrates that the exception will ^*
increase risks to publie health, safety, and welfare, or to water quality, or to publie and private property in the
vioinity or downstream of the property, and the exeeption shall be the least possible exeeption that eoul
granted and still provide eomplianee with the intent of th i i itirements. in addition, the exeeption
shall enly be gran4ed when it has been deter -mined by the direetor- thm one or mere ef the follewing applies:
ache -requirement would cause a severe and unexpected €inaneialeconomic hardship that outweighs the
requirement's benefits, and the er;teri for ., adjustment e „t be et; or
ham. To determine whether the requirement would eause harm or a significant threat of harm to publie
health, safety, and welfare, the environment, or publie and pFivate property, and the oriteria for an
adjustment cannot be met; o
e. The requirement is not technically feasible, and the oriteria for an adjustment cannot be met; 0
,l An emerge.,;r..., r; o sts th..t « s;t..tes approval of the v rtion
2. imposes a severe and
unexpected economic hardship shall aos^r;hv, at a rr.;..;rr.0 on the project applicant, the applicant must
document for City review and approval, all of the following:, at a minimum:
a. a -.-The current, pre -project use of the site; and
b. b-How application of the requirement(s) for which an exception is being requested restricts the proposed
use of the site compared to the restrictions that existed prior to adoption of this chapter; and
c. e-The possible remaining uses of the site if the exception were not granted; and
d. d-The possible uses of the site that would have been allowed prior to the adoption of this chapter; and
e. e-A comparison of the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of the requirements
versus the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of requirements that existed prior to
adoption of the requirements of this chapter; and
f. The feasibility of the applicant to alter the project to apply the requirements of this chapter.
3. Any exception must meet the following criteria:
a. The exception will not increase risk to the public health and welfare, nor be injurious to other properties
in the vicinity and/or downstream, and to the quality of waters of the state; and
b. The exception is the least possible exception that could be granted to comply with the intent of the
minimum requirements.
3-A. An exception to the requirements shall only be granted to the extent necessary to provide relief from the
economic hardship as determined by the dir-e6tefDirector, to alleviate the harm or threat of harm to the
degree that compliance with the requirement becomes technically feasible, or to perform the emergency
work that the direeto Director determines is warranted.
4.5.5-The direeterDirector may require an applicant to provide additional information at the applicant's expense,
including (but not limited to) an engineer's report or analysis.
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 201
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 26/30
-5-.6.6-When an exception is granted, the dir-eeteeDirector may impose new or additional requirements to offset or
mitigate harm or the threat of harm that may be caused by granting the exception, or that would have been
prevented if the exception had not been granted.
CB. Adjustments.
1. The di-ect Director may approve a request for adjustments to the requirements of this chapter when the
derDirector finds that:
a. a -.-The adjustment provides substantially equivalent environmental protection; and
b. b-The objectives of safety, function, environmental protection, and facility maintenance are met, based
on sound engineering practices.
2—During construction, the directorDirector may require, or the applicant may request, that the construction
of drainage control facilities and associated project designs be adjusted if physical conditions are discovered
on the site that are inconsistent with the assumptions on which the approval was based, including (but not
limited to) unexpected soil or water conditions, weather -generated problems, or changes in the design of the
improved areas; and
3—A request by the applicant for an adjustment shall be submitted to the di-ree4orDirector for review and
approval prior to implementation. The request shall be in writing and shall provide facts substantiating the
requirements of subsection (C)(1) of this section, and if made during construction, the factors in subsection
(C)(2) of this section. Any such modifications made during the construction of drainage control facilities
shall be included with the final approved drainage control plan.
13C. Appeal.
1. The Director's decision on an application for an exception or adjustment may appeal to the
hearing examiner in accordance with a Type II appeal process in ECDC Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
2. The applicant shall carry the burden of proof.
3. The decision of the hearing examiner is appealable to superior court in accordance with Chapter 36.70C
RCW. [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
1 18.30.080 Easements, deeds -,Access and covenants.Covenants.
A. Easements. A publie sterm drainage inspeetion easement shall be required v4wre-.-Access. Proper ingress and egress
shall be provided to the City to inspect or perform any duty imposed upon the City by this Title. The City shall notify
the responsible party in writing of a failure to provide access. If the responsible party fails to respond within seven
days from the receipt of notification, the City may order the work required completed or otherwise address the cause of
improper access. The obligation for the payment of all cost that may be incurred or expended by the City in causing
such work to be done shall be imposed on the person holding title to the subject property
these storm water best management pracfces confines to fimetion& Covenants. Maintenance covenants shall be
required for each site/lot that will be maintained by a private entity such as designed.
Rase a ffts shall be an individual, corporation, or homeowner's association. The maintenance covenant shall address
or append requirements and responsibilities for long-term management and maintenance the applicable BMP(s).
Maintenance covenants shall be as specified in o.,gi ffee -inn div sio City Engineering Division documents or approved
by the directorDirector, and recorded with Snohomish County and on all proper deeds.
The--, Edim-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 202
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 27/30
B. Deeds and Covenants fer- Lew impaet Development. Deed restr4etiens and eeveaaa4s shall be r-eqttif-ed 99F all sit
ftmetion as designed. The deed restrietiens of eevefia-fits shall address er append fequiremeffts a -ad responsibilities
long term management and inaintenanee of these best management prae [Ord. 3792 § 1, 2010].
18.30.090 Post Construction Inspection and maintenanee rolesMaintenance Roles and
responAesResponsibilities.
Proper construction inspection and maintenance of storm wate stormwater facilities (including ing eonst etion BNWs' is
essential for the protection of the eiPfIsCity's MS4 and the environment. laspeetion and m .mien., e of all steizm
water facilities shall be required in aceor-dance with the storm water supplement.
A. Storm Wate Stormwater Maintenance and Inspection Standards. Storm wate Stormwater facilities shall be
inspected and maintained per the requirements of the storm water � .o *Volume I and Volume V of the
SWMMWW. For systems which do not have a maintenance standard, the owner shall develop a standard based on
guidelines from the manufacturer, designer, or a registered professional engineer and submit the standards to the
director- for apprev-a Director for approval. The purpose of the maintenance standard is to determine if maintenance is
required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facility's required condition at all times between
inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between inspections is not a violation of this chapter.
B. Ownership. Storm wate Stormwater facilities are either privately or publicly owned and maintained. All storm
waterstormwater facilities that serve commercial and industrial site private property are private. Storm drama
facilities, unless an agreement between the property owner and the City states otherwise. Stormwater facilities or -
controls -that are privately owned by a homeowner's association or similar organization also are private. The City may
offer an incentive program to owners to support the proper maintenance of private storm drainage facilities.
C. Public Stormwater Facilities. The City shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing
public stormwater facilities as funded through the Stormwater Utility.
D. Maintenance and Inspection of Permanent Facilities. All privately owned storm drainage facilities or controls shall
be maintained by the owner, or the homeowner or owner association ("owner") if one is established as part of a
residential or commercial development. All private storm drainage facilities shall be regularly inspected to ensure
proper operation and shall monitor the facility or control as required or as set forth in theme
„�SWMMWW. The eOwner shall maintain records of inspection and maintenance, disposal receipts,
and monitoring results. The records shall catalog the action taken, the person who took it, the date said action was
taken, how it was done, rests is of any r mitering off +t, and any problems encountered or follow-up actions required.
The records shall be made available to the eityCity upon request. The a Owner shall maintain a copy of the
Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Manual (if required) on site, and shall make reference to such document in
real property records filed with Snohomish County, so others who acquire real property served by the privately owned
storm drainage facilities or controls are notified of their obligation to maintain such facilities or controls.
1. Within one year for wet pool f4eilities and retention'detention faeilities;
z. Within six months for typieal maintenanee-,
3. Within omenthsvrev'Ing,
4. Within two yeafs for maintenance that requir-es eapital eanstr+Ietion of less than
.
EE. City Inspection of private stormwater facilities. The City shall have the authority to periodically inspect private
stormwater facilities, including low impact development stormwater facilities, for compliance with this chapter.
F. Right of Entry. An authorized representative of the City may enter private property at all reasonable times to
conduct inspections, tests or to carry out other duties imposed by the a state or Federal program provided that the City
The--, Ed-m-onds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, -are, e_-,urremt Glar-ough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 203
7.3.c
Edmonds Page 14/44
Edmonds Page 28/30
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
E
makes a good faith effort to notify the property owner or person responsible for the premises prior to entering and
Q.
m
presents proper credentials to that person. If entry is refused or cannot be obtained, the Director shall have recourse to
m
every remedy provided by law to secure entry, including but not limited to, obtaining an administrative warrant for
entry.
c
0
G. Right of Entry for Illicit Discharge. In the event of an illicit discharge from a privately -owned stormwater facility
E
caused by improper maintenance or operation or other circumstance, the provisions of ECC 7.200 shall apply.
E
0
U
H. Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon written notice by the City, a private stormwater facility shall be promptly
repaired and/or brought up to applicable standards by the property owner or the person responsible for said facility. If
c
a private stormwater facility serves multiple lots and the responsibility for maintenance has not been specified on a
E
recorded subdivision plat, short plat, or other legal document, maintenance, operation and repair responsibility shall
w
rest with the homeowners' association, if one exists, or otherwise with the properties served by the facility, or finally,
with the owners of the property on which the facilities are located.
c
a
I. Disposal of Waste from Maintenance Activities. Disposal of waste from maintenance activities shall be conducted
in accordance with the h4nimumminimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling, Chapter 173-304 WAC,
guidelines for disposal of waste materials from storm water maintenance activities, and where appropriate, the
0
V
Dangerous Waste Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC.
F. City inspection. The inspection drainage f4eilities is to
E
regular- of privately owned storm or eontrels essential ena
the city to evaluate the operation of the eity's MS4 and the en-vironment. The eity shall have aeoess to
m
proper private
storm water facilities for inspeetion to enstire they are operated and main4ained in aeeor-danee vflith EGG
0
c
properly
drainage f eil;ties [Ord' 3 792 § 1 20101.
L
r
18.30.100 Enforcement pfoc esProcedures.
t4
E
L
A. General enforcement action shall be in accordance with this chapter whenever a person has violated any provision
0
Cn
of this chapter. The choice of enforcement action is at the discretion of the eit The seve ity f any penalty shall be
based en the natwe of the vialatien, the dafflage, er risk to the publie er to publie r-esetifees, or- the degree of bad faith
Ln
m
of the person „jeet to the en f r,.oment aetio .City.
�
c
B. Notiee of Violation and Order- to Correet. The direetoF shall have the authority to serve a person a notice of violat 0
and or -der to eorreet O�OVQTC) if an aetion is being undertaken in violation of this •issuanee of any otherL y
`d
warning, notiee, or or -der is not a eondition pFeeedent for the direetor to issue an • /
l
0
in M
desist, oappFapFime eases, the speei
W
U
• il ith ; U
W
M
2
either by certified ,v..,:l with fetff receipt C
0
rolls of the Snohomish County assessor as die- E
M
r
r
Q
C
E
t
0
rnugQ
t, OrdinA4ipp 4037 r ..oa r,,,., n �n, Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 204
7.3.c
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 29/30
B. Civil Penalties Adopted. ECDC Chapter 20.110 enforcement procedures are herein adopted in full, as modified in
this chapter, with the proviso that repeat offenders or violations deemed an immediate public hazard shall be subject to
compliance and appeal timelines as deemed appropriate by the Director based on the specific nature of the violation.
C. Maintenance Orders. The dir-eetefDirector shall have the authority to issue to an owner or person an order to
maintain or repair a component of astorm wate stormwater facility or BMP to bring it into compliance with this
chapter, the storm water s,.ppleme SWMMWW, the Edmonds Stormwater Addendum, and the Edmonds Community
Development Code. The order shall include: _
1. 4-.A description of the specific nature, extent and time of the violation and the damage or potential damage
that reasonably might occur;
2. 2-.A notice that the violation or the potential violation cease and desist and, in appropriate cases, the specific
corrective actions to be taken; and
3. 3-A reasonable time to comply, depending on the circumstances.
D. Civil Penalty. A person who fails to comply with the requirements of this chapter, who fails to conform to an
approval or order issued, who undertakes new development without first obtaining approval, or who fails to comply
with a stop work order issued under these regulations shall be subject to a civil penalty levied in accordance with the
provisions of ECDC Chapter 20.110ECDE; provided, however, that the appeal process shall commence with a notice
of violation as provided in ECDC 20.110.040(.B)-..
Civil penalties for code violations shall be imposed in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter
20.110; provided, however, that in addition to the penalties set forth in that chapter, the hearing
examiner is authorized to levy a penalty of up to $twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per occurrence based
upon an assessment of the following factors. Where such factors are present, the hearing examiner is
authorized to levy such penalty after taking into consideration the full impact of the violation and any
mitigating circumstances (see subsection (D)(2) ^ below):
a. a. The violation created a risk to public health and the significance of the risk.
b. b-The violation damaged the environment and the significance of the damage.
c. e-The violation caused damage to public and private property and the significance of such damage.
d. d A history of similar violations, if any.
e. e-The economic benefit of the violations, if any, to the person or entity responsible for the violations.
2. Mitigating circumstances which may be used to offset or reduce the time resulting from the application of
the preceding factors are limited to:
a. a -.-Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and no history of similar violations.
b. b-Full compliance with a voluntary compliance agreement and a history of one or two similar violations
(lesser reduction).
c. c-.-A "voluntary compliance agreement" is defined as a legally binding agreement entered into between
the cityCity and the alleged violators, by which the violator(s) acknowledge the existence of the
violation, waive all appeal rights, and agree to and do pay a fine in an amount stipulated to between the
violator and the eiyCity.
The--, Edmonds City Code and Gonmnunity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed July . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 205
Edmonds
Edmonds
Chapter 18.30 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Page 30/30
3—If the violation(s) are not corrected as ordered, or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into
within that time period and no appeal is filed, the penalty for the next 15-day period shall be 150 percent of
the initial penalties, and the penalties for the next 15-day period shall be 200 percent of the initial penalties.
The intent of this subsection is to increase penalties beyond the maximum penalties stated as an additional
means to achieve timely compliance.
Unless otherwise provided in a voluntary compliance agreement, civil penalties shall be paid within 30
days of service of the notice and order or stop work order if not appealed. Payment of the civil penalties
assessed under this chapter does not relieve a person found to be responsible for a code violation of his or her
duty to correct the violation or to pay any and all civil penalties or other cost assessments issued pursuant to
this chapter.
The eityCity may suspend immediate payment of civil penalties if the person responsible for a code
violation has entered into a voluntary compliance agreement. Penalties shall begin to accrue again pursuant
to the terms of the voluntary compliance agreement if any necessary permits applied for are denied, canceled
or not pursued, if corrective action identified in the voluntary compliance agreement is not completed as
specified, or if the property is allowed to return to a condition similar to that condition which gave rise to the
voluntary compliance agreement; provided, however, that additional penalties shall not be imposed until
additional notice and opportunity for hearing have been provided in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110
ECDC.
6-Civil penalties assessed create joint and several personal obligations in all persons responsible for a code
violation.
E. The determination of the hearing examiner issued in accordance with ECDC Chapter 20.110ECDC shall be
appealable to the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 36.70C RCW
F. The remedies provided for in this section shall not be exclusive. The eityCity may also use other civil and
administrative remedies available to it, including but not limited to the remedies provided in ECDC Title 19 and the
state building and dangerous buildings codes. [Ord �792 § 1 20101.
The--, Edmonds City Code and Gonmutmity Development Gode, ffe, eurremit Ula-Fough Ordinanee 4037, passed . Version:
September 8, 2015
Packet Pg. 206
VW
c
0
a
VQ
N
r+
N
N
O
N
n
O 4
Attachment: Attachment 4 - SW Code Council Public Hearing-20160802 (1465 : Stormwater Management
i
c
0
O
h
n
r-+
n
0
rD
Attachment: Attachment 4 - SW Code Council Public Hearing-20160802 (1465 : Stormwater Management
Why is the Code being updated?
Mandated by Department of Ecology
Compliance with 2013-2018 Western Washington Phase II
Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Permit) required
Compliance with 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for
Western Washington (Ecology's Manual) required
(Edmonds is essentially implementing identical requirements
as 87 "NPDES Phase II" municipalities across western
Washington)
c
aD
E
L
E
L
0
U)
LO
CD
IV
N
O
00
O
0
N
al
C
0
U
a�
0
U
a
r
E
w
r
a
(H arMar) A
LVA I Packet Pg. 209
What changes can be expected?
Most substantial change has to do with new Low
Impact Development requirements ("Minimum
Requirement (MR) #5" in the Permit)
Affects small projects (>2,000 sq. ft. of impervious)
More complex site assessment requirements
Additional City review requirements
VAI Packet Pg. 210
What changes can be expected? m
Stormwater Management (SWM)
L
- MR #5: Implementation
Category 1
Project Sites
(Trigger MR #1-#5)
Category 2
Project Sites
(Trigger MR #1-#9)
5
LO
CD
N
O
00
List #1 orto
0
N
Modeling
Cu
(LID Performance Standard]
O
U
a�
O
List #2 or
Modeling y
(LID Performance Standard)
a
w
r
a
VAI Packet Pg. 211
"List 1" and "List 2" _
L
List 1 and List 2 provide options, established by Department of
0
Ecology, for managing stormwater runoff on a project site. �'
Roofs
N
O
O
53
0
N
al
C
CU
O
-
2
V
d
C
7
O
U
d
O
U
0
E
t
V
R
Separate lists must be followed for each type of surface.
LWA I H
Packet Pg. 212
"i ist 1" and "List 2"
L
In design, all SWM options must be considered in the order listed. 0
0
The first option that is considered feasible is to be used.LO
1. Soil Quality and Depth
Roofs W7
1. Full Dispersion or Downspout
Full Infiltration
2. Rain Gardens [or Bioretention]
3. Downspout Dispersion Systems
4. Perforated Stub -out
Connections
5. Detention pipes or vaults
(City -specific standard)
N
O
O
O
r Other Hard Surfaces
0
N
tM
C
�L
R
_j
d
a
0
RV MMMV U
1. Full Dispersion co
2. Permeable Pavement [or
Rain Gardens or Bioretentic
E
3. Sheet Flow Dispersion, or
2
Concentrated Flow Dispersi
4. Detention pipes or vaults
'
(City -specific standard)
w
a
(H a E) E) a D A
L&A I Packet Pg. 213
What changes can be expected?
City will not require historical tracking of
impervious surface area on individual properties.
Stormwater management of at least 25% of existing
unmanaged impervious surfaces, but no more than
area equal to proposed
(retrofitting).
new plus replaced area
c
aD
E
(D
L
E
L
O
r
U)
LO
IV
N
O
00
O
0
N
al
C
�L
2
V
0
U
a�
0
U
E
a
r
E
w
r
a
(H aDDar) A
LVA I Packet Pg. 214
7.3.d
F ^ 9
The project includes an existing
"unmanaged" parking lot, and
an existing structure. The
project will tear down and
rebuild the structure, but will
not alter the parking area. The
project discharges to the City's
storm system.
Triggers Minimum
Requirements No. 1-5
Plus Retrofit Requirement
Project site contains
existing hard surfaces that
do not drain to an approved
stormwater management
facility, and will not be
modified as part of the
proposed project.
c
a
E
m
c
List No. 1
L
Existing hard surfaces: Use o
any BMPs from List No. 1 to
manage at least 25% of
existing unmanaged surface o
00
area. BMPs are not required
0
to be evaluated in priority
order or document
infeasibility. _
1 0
0
U
Minimum Req. 5 Applies 00
for Replaced Structure
r
New/Replaced surfaces: Sei 0
details on requirements in
Project Scenarios 2-5. a
0
E
w
a
9 Packet Pg. 215
IN -
�.
eaaeaI
The project results in 3,000
square feet of new plus
replaced hard surface area
and discharges to the City's
storm system.
10
Triggers Minimum
Requirements No. 1-5
• Result in 2,000 square feet or
greater of new plus replaced
hard surface area, or
• Has land disturbing activity of
7,000 square feet or greater
List No. 1 or
Modeling
(LID Performance
Standard)
11�
� �II II
�
The project removes and
replaces structures and
pavement totaling 12,000
square feet of area and
discharges to the City's
storm system.
11
Triggers Minimum
Requirements No. 1-9
• Result in 5,000 square feet or
greater of new plus replaced
hard surface area, or
• Convert 0.75 acres, or more, of
vegetation to lawn or
landscaped areas, or
• Convert 2.5 acres, or more, of
native vegetation to pasture
List No. 2 or
Modeling
(LID Performance
Standard)
7.3.d
The project is located in a
direct discharge basin and
includes specific requirements
for the Edmonds Way basin.
The project results in 3,000
square feet of new plus
replaced hard surface area.
13
Triggers MRs No. 1-5
(Category 1 Project)
Direct Discharge to Puget Sound
CATEGORY 1 OR 2
PROJECTS
Only a subset of
List No. 1 applies
If project is also located in the Provide peak flow
Edmonds Way basin control for all
remaining project
site runoff
The project removes and
replaces structures and
pavement totaling 6,000
square feet and does NOT
discharge to the City's storm
system.
Triggers Min. Req. No. 1-9
(Category 2 Project)
M
c
CATEGORY 1 OR 2 '
PROJECTS
L
r
3
E
L
O
Approval from LO
LO
Discharge to Downstream Downstream
Property Owner(s) co
0
Discharge On -site to List No.
BMP (not required to be
evaluated in priority order or
document infeasibility)
Pump On -Site Runoff to City's
storm system
0
N
01
CU
d
Geotech Required
Peer Review Fee
L
O
U
a�
O
Quantitative
Downstream Analysis
a
s
r
r
ZI
14 1 Packet Pg. 219
Schedule / Status
June 14, 2016 — City Council Study Session
July 20, 2016 — Public Meetings
• August 2, 2016 — City Council Public Hearing
August 16, 2016 — City Council Action Item (Seeking
approval of code with an effective date of Jan 1, 2017)
Fall 2016 — Completion of Stormwater
Development of implementation tools
checklists)
Addendum.
(e.g., review
WAI Packet Pg. 220
7.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Authorization to contract with James G. Murphy to sell surplus city equipment (5 min.)
Staff Lead: Mike Adams
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Royce Napolitino
Background/History
Previously, the city has utilized the services of James G. Murphy Auctioneers to sell surplus city vehicles
and equipment.
The City vehicles being submitted for review.
Unit# 58-STR 1999 Dodge % ton pickup
VIN# 3B7KC26ZIXM557492
Unit# 79-POL 1991 GMC Step Van
VIN# 1GTHP32KOM3502431
Unit# 203-POL 2008 Harley Davidson FLHTP
VIN# 1HD1FMM138Y704203
Unit# 277-POL 2005 Dodge Stratus
VIN# 1133AL46T651\1645277
Unit# 405-POL 2008 Harley Davidson FLHTP
VIN# 1HD1FMM198Y705405
Unit# 495-FLT 1999 GMC 5-15 Pickup
VIN# 1GTCS19X3XK513495
Unit# 681-POL 2006 Ford Crown Victoria VIN# 2FAHP71W76X135681
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that authorization be granted to Public Works to contract with James G. Murphy
Auctioneers to sell surplus city vehicles.
Narrative
The utilization of James G. Murphy Auctioneers for the sale of surplus vehicles has proven to be a cost
effective method to manage surplus items. The surplus sales monies will be considered 2016 Revenue
for the B-Fund Replacement Account.
Packet Pg. 221
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Authorization to modify an Agreement with the Cold Spring Granite Company for the Veteran's Plaza (10
min.)
Staff Lead: Carrie Hite
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Rob English
Background/History
On January 20, 2015, Council approved the concept for the Veterans Plaza.
On August 2, 2016, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign the revised Goods & Materials Agreement
for the procurement of stone cladding, paving and site furnishings for the Edmonds Veterans Plaza from
Cold Spring Granite Company.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the Change Authorization document.
Narrative
On August 2, 2016 City Council authorized the signing of a Goods & Materials Agreement with
Cold Spring Granite Company for the procurement of stone cladding, paving and site furnishings
for the Veterans Plaza. Meanwhile, VFW Post 8870, the project sponsor, has received so many
contributions for the Veterans Plaza from that the number of donors outnumbers the quantity
of donor pavers available in the plaza. To accommodate all of the additional donors, Cold Spring
Granite Company will provide 1 foot square pavers in place of the previously ordered 1 foot by 2
foot pavers to provide more opportunities for donor recognition. The Change Authorization has
been reviewed and approved by Legal.
Attachments:
Change Authorization
Revised Goods Materials Agreement - Signed
Packet Pg. 222
8.1.a
� /�
14 >lwlkll * ._ .
�
CHANGE AUTHORIZATION
Date:0f3115/2016
REPLACEMENT PIECES:
❑ Purchaser hereby pays the cost for the replacement pieces listed below.
❑ ADDITIONS ❑ DELETIONS ® MODIFICATIONS
Purchaser hereby agrees to accept the changes specified and further agrees to pay the amounts as shown.
TO: City of Edmonds - City Clerk (J361721)
ATTN: Henry Schroder, P.E.
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
PHONE: 425-771-0220
FAX: 425-672-5750
JOB NO: 1003707
NAME: Veterans Plaza
LOCATION: Edmonds, WA
Change size of typical Academy Black pavers to 1 1-3/4" x 11-3/4"
----------- please sign and return allowing drafting to incorporate change
$ 950.00
*Price DOES NOT include any applicable taxes. CURRENT TAXES WILL BE ADDED AT THE TIME
OF THE INVOICING UNLESS AN APPROVED EXEMPT TAX CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN RECEIVED PRIO
TO INVOICING.
Shop Drawings Weeks Shop Tickets Weeks O Initial O Partial O Complete
Delivery: Start delivery weeks after receipt of approved shop drawings, cutting lists or shop
tickets with all pertinent cutting information & signed Change Authorization. Balance of
delivery per mutually agreed upon schedules for shop drawing submission, approvals, &
fabrication time.
Please sign and return this Proposal & return via fax, this will authorize us to
AMOUNT
$950.00
*TOTAL
$950.00 USD
NOTE: This Change Authorization becomes part of and is specifically incorporated as a part of the existing contract and is subject to the
same terms and conditions contained therein.
Please sign and return a copy of this form and retain a copy for your records. No work will commence until this signed form is returned.
ACCEPTED BY BUYER: City of Edmonds - City Clerk COLD SPRING GRANITE COMPANY
(J361721)
BUYER
SIGNATURE: (Officer or Authorized Rep) DATE
17482 Granite West Road, Cold Spring, MN 56320-4578 USA
P:800-328-5040 P:320-685-3621 F:320-685-8490
Tom Eisenschenk
PROP Y: PROJECT MANAGER
' DATE
CS-031-2(MAY2013)
a
Packet Pg. 223
GOODS & MATERIALS AGREEMENT
between the City of Edmonds
and
Coldspring
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made by and between the City of Edmonds, a
Washington municipal corporation (the "City"), and Coldspring located and doing business
at 17482 Granite West Road, MN 56320-4578, telephone number (800) 328-55040,
respectively (the "Vendor") as a sole source procurement contract for goods and materials.
AGREEMENT
I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. The Vendor shall provide the following goods
and materials to the City:
Exterior stone paving, stone cladding and stone site furnishings as follows:
Manufacturer Name / Part Description
Coldspring
- 556 square feet of Academy Black paving, 1-15/16" thick, Thermal
finish
- 24 square feet of Academy Black steps, 6-1/8" thick, Thermal finish
- 1065 square feet of Mountain Green wall cladding, varying
thicknesses, Diamond 10, Diamond 100 finish
- 50 square feet of Mountain Green seat cubes, 1' — 3" thick, Diamond 10
finish
- 103 square feet of Mountain Green Type 2 benches, 6" thick, Diamond
100, Diamond 10 finish
- Shop Drawings
Goods and materials shall comply with Site Workshop LLC drawings T0.00,
L1.10, L2.10, L3.00, L3.01, L3.20, L3.40 and L3.50 dated May 10, 2016 and
specification Section 044256 — Exterior Stone Cladding, Section 321440 —
Stone Paving and Section 129310 — Stone Site Furnishings dated June 17,
2016.
Veteran's Plaza
PN E6MA/c480
Packet Pg. 224
Price includes freight. Unloading is not included.
Reference: Coldspring quote dated 7/6/16 (4 pages).
II. TIME OF COMPLETION. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, the
Vendor shall provide and deliver shop drawings to the City of Edmonds four to five weeks
after the Agreement is signed and start delivery of stone paving, cladding and site
furnishings eight to ten weeks after receipt of approved shop drawings. Delivery of goods
and materials shall be to the City of Edmonds Veteran's Plaza, 250 5th Avenue N, Edmonds,
WA and. Time is of the essence for this Agreement. The delivery date shall be mutually
agreed upon between 8:00 AM and 2:00 PM, Monday through Friday only.
III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Vendor an amount not to exceed One
Hundred Forty-four Thousand, One Hundred Twelve Dollars and Fifty Cents ($144,112.50),
including freight and Washington State Sales Tax, for the goods and materials included in
this Agreement. The City shall pay the Vendor the full amount of invoice within 30 days of
receipt of all merchandise listed above when received in good condition.
If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify the Vendor and
reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the
parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion.
Certification of Price: The Vendor hereby certifies that the City is receiving the lowest price
offered as compared to the Vendors' similarly situated clients, terms and conditions.
Defective Goods. The Vendor guarantees the City that the goods and materials shall be free
of any and all defects in the workmanship and materials. The City reserves its right to
withhold payment from the Vendor for any defective or unauthorized goods or materials.
Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. VENDOR ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PAYMENT SHALL
CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE
AND IDENTIFIED BY VENDOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME REQUEST FOR FINAL
PAYMENT IS MADE.
IV. WARRANTY. See attachment "A"
V. INDEMNIFICATION. See attachment "A"
Veteran's Plaza
C:PN E6MA/c480
Packet Pg. 225
VI. INSURANCE. The Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which
may arise from or in connection with the provision of goods or materials to the City.
No Limitation. The Vendors' maintenance of insurance as required by the
Agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Vendor to the coverage
provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available
at law or in equity.
Minimum Scope of Insurance. The Vendor shall obtain insurance of the types described
below:
Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office
(ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover products liability. The City shall be
named as an insured under the Vendors' Commercial General Liability insurance
policy using ISO Additional Insured -Vendors Endorsement CG 20 15 or a substitute
endorsement providing equivalent coverage.
Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Vendor shall maintain the following insurance limits:
Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no Iess than
$1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and a $2,000,000
product liability aggregate limit.
Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to
contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. The Vendors' insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect
the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage
maintained by the City shall be excess of the Vendors' insurance and shall
not contribute with it.
2. The Vendors' insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written
notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the
City.
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII.
Verification of Coverage. The Vendor shall furnish the City with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not
necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance
requirements of the Vendor before goods or materials will be accepted by the City.
Veteran's Plaza
CPN E6MA/c480
2
Packet Pg. 226
VII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
A. Non -Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict
performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement,
or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall
not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements
or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect.
B. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. Both parties agree to bring suit only
in the Minnesota state court located in the Count of Stearns, State of Minnesota.
BOTH PARTIES CONSENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE
DISTRICT COURT, STEARNS COUNTY, FOR ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES ARISING
OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT. Violation of this covenant will bar recovery by BUYER in
any other court.
C. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall
be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement,
unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective
three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and
shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in
this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
D. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party
without the written consent of the non -assigning party shall be void. If the non -
assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made
without additional written consent. a�
�n
E. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the c
provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly E
authorized representative of the City and Vendor. L
F. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Q
Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior y
verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such
statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part M
of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby
made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits c
to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms °
of this Agreement shall prevail.
N
G. Compliance with Laws. The Vendor agrees to comply with all federal,
state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the
future become applicable to Vendors' business, equipment, and personnel engaged
�a
Veteran's Plaza a .
CPN E6MA f c4•84
4
Packet Pg. 227
in the provision of goods or materials as set forth in this Agreement or accruing out
of the provision of those goods or materials.
IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become
effective on the last date entered below.
VENDOR:
CITY OF EDMONDS:
-
- By:
Print Name, fz �tn rY1�
Its W uj- a-e l
Print Name: David 0. Earling
Its Mayor
DATE:
DATE:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
VENDOR:
CITY OF EDMONDS:
Coldspring
City Clerk, City of Edmonds
17482 Granite West Road
121 5th Avenue North
MN 56320-4578
Edmonds, WA 98020
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
Scott Passe , City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
Vt'.Y:(:.rarl's Plaza
C:PN E()MA/c480
Packet Pg. 228
ATTACHMENT G0A"
WARRANTY. Subject to natural differences in color and other characteristics common in stone,
Vendor promises to City the material sold follows the description of material in the Agreement, is
free of defects, and meets the version of the National Building Granite Quarries Association, Inc.
specification in place as of the date of the contract.
WARRANTY REMEDY AND LIMITATION OF WARRANTY REMEDY. The only
remedy for breach of these promises shall be, at the Vendor's discretion, correction of the materials,
replacement of the materials, refund of the amount by which the value of the materials is reduced by
defect, or any combination of these alternatives. The remedies stated in this paragraph are sole and
exclusive remedies.
DISCLAIMER OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES. THERE IS NO IMPLIED WARRANTY
OF MERCHANTABILITY AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS
FOR CITY'S PARTICULAR PURPOSE; THE IMPLIED WARRANTY OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND THE IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR CITY'S
PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED.
City shall NOT in any event be entitled to recover consequential damages.
TIME LIMITATION. To make a warranty claim, City must give Vendor written notice of the
breach within 30 days of discovering the breach. No warranty claim can be made more than 1 year
after Vendor delivers goods to City.
CITY'S OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY VENDOR: In claims by any third party in any
action or proceeding wherein it is determined that Vendor is at fault, this paragraph does not require Q
indemnity by the City. However, in any other action or proceeding by a third party in which a third to
le
party makes a claim against Vendor and it is determined that Vendor is not at fault, then and in that 77
event, City shall indemnify the Vendor and hold the Vendor harmless from any and all such claims. .a
In any action by a third party wherein fault is apportioned between City and Vendor, each party shall
be responsible only for the portion of the fault attributed to it. This agreement is not for the benefit
in
of any third party.
c
d
E
m
m
L
a
N
f�
�L
M
G
Packet Pg. 229
COLDS PR I NGTm
DATE: 06 Jul 2016
ATTN: Henry Schroder, P.E.
COMPANY: City of Edmonds - City Clerk
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
PROPOSAL & AGREEMENT (Material Supply Only)
Proposed By: Lisa Hennen
PROJECT: Veterans Plaza
LOCATION: Edmonds, WA
JOB NUMBER:
PHONE: 425-771-0220
FAX: 425-672-5750
Unless revoked earlier in accordance with the attached Terms & Conditions, this quote expires after 30 days.
COLD SPRING GRANITE COMPANY d.b,a Coldspring (Hereinafter "Seller") of Cold Spring, MN, proposes to furnish materials as
described below.
The following bid documents, drawings & specifications will be referred to as Agreement Documents and shall apply insofar as
these documents do not conflict with the terms and conditions of this agreement.
REFERENCE:
Reference the attached bid documents:
1. Exhibit A — Bid Clarifications dated 6 July, 2016
2. Exhibit B —Quantities dated 6 July, 2016
3. Terms & Conditions
Please review, sign and return — this will authorize Coldspring to proceed with this as an order
MATERIAL / FINISH: Academy Black@, Mountain Green@ / Thermal, Diamond(B) 10, DiamondO 100
The Agreement Documents, so for as they relate to material listed herein, are made a part of this Agreement.
Seller's Standard Anchors are Included: ❑ NO ® YES Seller's Shop Drawings are Included: ❑ NO Z YES
Contract Price: $131,250.00 U5D*
*Contract Price DOES NOT include any applicable taxes. CURRENT TAXES WILL BE ADDED AT THE TIME OF THE
INVOICING UNLESS AN APPROVED EXEMPT TAX CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN RECEIVED PRIOR TO INVOICING.
Materials to be delivered F.O.B. Edmonds, WA
City, State, ZIP Code NOTE: Change of delivery address may affect applicable tax rate.
PAYMENT TERMS: Paid as shipped, net 30 days, no retainer. In the event purchaser delays shipment of
scheduled fabricated material, terms will be paid as fabricated, net 30 days, no retainer.
(Subject to Credit Approval. Payment can be made by business check or wire transfer. Payment with order can eliminate the need for this agreement.)
SHOP DRAWINGS: 44-5 weeks SHOP TICKETS: weeks O Initial O Partial 40 Complete submission
DELIVERY: Start delivery 8-10 weeks after receipt of approved shop drawings or cutting lists with all necessary cutting information &
returned signed Agreement. Balance of delivery per mutually agreed upon schedules for shop drawing submissions, approvals, and
fabrication time. A 107. minimum upcharge of the total contract amount applies for expedited delivery.
THIS PROPOSAL & AGREEMENT FOR MATERIAL INCORPORATES ALL OF THE TERMS & CONDITIONS PRINTED ON THE
FRONT OF THIS DOCUMENT AND/OR INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS.
Buyer hereby accepts Seller's offer to sell and agrees to perform In accordance with all terms and conditions. The document is not a binding
agreement until accepted and signed by Coldspring Authorized Signer; however, Buyer, by acceptance of the first delivery of material will be
deemed to have accepted all terms and conditions contained herein regardless of whether this document has been executed by Buyer. The
recipient agrees and acknowledges that this bid proposal is proprietary and confidential and shall not be disseminated or disclosed to any
third -parties without the express written consent of the Seller, This provision is binding upon receipt of this document and regardless as to whether It is
signed by either party or whatever materials are delivered.
ACCEPTED BY BUYER: City of Edmonds - City Clerk COLD SPRING GRANITE COMPANY
SIGNATURE: (Officer or Authorized Rep)
17482 Granite West Road, Cold Spring, MN 56320-4578
T: 800-551-7502 F: 320-685-8490
DATE
ACCEPTED BY: Coldspring Authorized Signer DATE
CS-031 -1 (APR2014)
Packet Pg. 230
0 COLDS PR ING""
Exhibit A - Bid Clarification
Project: Veterans Plaza
Location: Edmonds, WA
06 July 2016
1 This proposal is based on Site Workshop LLC drawings T0.00, 1-1.10, L2.10, L3.00, L3.01, L3.20,
L3.40 and L3.50 dated May 10, 2016, and specifications 'Section 044256 - Exterior Stone
Cladding' and 'Section 321440 - Stone Paving' dated June 17, 2016.
2 Physical property testing, anchor testing, and samples for testing are not included in this
proposal. Gratis historical test data is available on request.
3 Standard Coldspring anchors and anchor provisions are a part of this proposal. Backup
framing materials, miscellaneous support metals, and fasteners that tie the granite anchors
back to the structure are not included.
4 Design and engineering of the granite and anchorage systems are the responsibility of
others.
5 Pavers are priced 1-15/16" + 1 /8" - 1 /16" thick.
77
6 Stair treads are priced 6 1 /8" +/- 1 /8" thick. Exposed edges will be gauged to a uniform
thickness. c
a�
7 Paver engraving is not included in this proposal.
c
a�
8 (5) Veterans Wall medallions are included and priced as sandblast incised with standar E
accenting. L
a�
a
9 All paving is priced 'flat'. Warped tops and/or feathered edges (to accommodate grade w
changes) are not included.
as
M
10 Shop drawings are included.
11 Price includes freight to Edmonds, WA. Unloading will be the responsibility and expense of °o
others.
as
N
N
17482 Granite West Road, Cold Spring, MN 56320 T 800.328.5040 W www.coldspringusa.com
Q
Rev: Apr13
Page 1 of 1
Packet Pg. 231
�ErsnCOLDSPRING-
Project:
Veterans Plaza
Location:
Edmonds, WA
Item
Description
1
Paving
2
Steps
3
Veterans Wall
4
Seat cubes
5
Type 2 benches
Exhibit B - Quantities
Granite
Academy Black
Academy Black
Mountain Green
Mountain Green
Mountain Green
Finish
Thermal
Thermal
Diamond 10, Diamond 100
Diamond 10
Diamond 100, Diamond 10
The piece counts and square foot values noted are for reference only. They are based on Coldspring's
internal estimate surveys which include calculated rough stock overages utilized
in the fabrication processes and will not reflect finished, in place coverages.
'Contract Price DOES NOT include any applicable taxes. CURRENTTAXES WILL BE ADDED AT THE TIME OF INVOICING
UNLESS AN APPROVED EXEMPT TAX CERT€FICATE HAS BEEN RECEIVED PRIOR TO INVOICING.
17482 Granite West Road, Cold Spring, MN 56320 T800.328.5040 W www.coldspringuso.com
Thickness Sq Ft
1-15/16'
556
6-1 /8"
24
various
1,065
1'-3"
50
6"
103
1,799
06 July 2016
Amount
$
19,760.00
$
2,020.00
$
67,680.00
$
25,260.00
$
16,530.00
$
131,250.00
TAXES **
Rev: Apr13
Page 1 of 1
Attachment: Revised Goods Materials Agreement - Signed (1466 : Authorization to modify an Agreement with the Cold Spring Granite
8.1.b
CSGC, d.b.a. Coidspring
- TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. WARRANTY. Subject to natural differences in color and other
13. FIELD MEASUREMENTS: Seller is NOT responsible for making, verifying, or
characteristics common in stone, Seiler promises to Buyer that the
ensuring the accuracy of field measurements for the materials sold
material sold follows the description of material in the Agreement, Is
hereunder nor for any loss or damage arising as a result of Inaccurate
free of defects, and meets the version of the National Building
field measurements or discrepancies between information supplied by
Granite Quarries Association, Inc. specification in place as of the
Buyer and actual field dimensions,
date of the contract.
14. ENGINEERING & DESIGN: Engineer's calculations (sealed or unsealed) or
2. WARRANTY REMEDY AND LIMITATION OF WARRANTY REMEDY. The
engineer's seal on shop drawings are specifically excluded. Seller is NOT
only remedy for breach of these promises shall be, at the Seller's
responsible for any engineering or design with regard to the work on this
discretion, correction of the materials, replacement of the
project. Shop drawings, if provided by Seller, will show stone anchoring
materials, refund of the amount by which the value of the
methods and/or design concepts which must be approved by Buyer's
materials is reduced by defect, or any combination of these
engineer within the context of the Buyer's overall engineering and design
alternatives. The remedies stated in this paragraph are sole and
requirements of the project.
exclusive remedies.
15. PAYMENT, PERFORMANCE, OR SUPPLY BONDS: No bonds are Included Ir
3. DISCLAIMER OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES. THERE IS NO IMPLIED
Agreement Price.
WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED
16. PUBLIC PROJECTS: Upon request, Buyer will supply Seller with a copy of
WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR BUYER'S PARTICULAR PURPOSE; THE
Buyer's Labor and Material Payment Bond prior to initial shipment of
IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY AND THE IMPLIED
material on public projects.
WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR BUYER'S PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
17. SUPERSEDING CLAUSE: This document contains the terms and condition;
HEREBY DISCLAIMED.
upon which Seller offers this quotation for materials and/or services on the
4. Buyer shall NOT in any event be entitled to recover consequential
project referred to herein. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the term!
damages.
and conditions contained in this document supersede all conflicting a
5. TiME LIMITATION. To make a warranty claim, Buyer must give Seller
otherwise inconsistent terms and conditions contained elsewhere.
written notice of the breach within 30 days of discovering the
18, CHANGE ORDERS/REPLACEMENT PIECES: Change orders anc
breach, No warranty claim can be made more than 1 year after
replacement pieces shall be priced separately from this Agreement anc
Seller delivers goods to Buyer.
Seiler will NOT begin work on any change orders or replacement piece;
6. CONDITIONS BEYOND CONTROL OF SELLER. Seller will not be liable
without the order and price being put in writing and the Buyer's writter
for any delay or failure to make delivery occasioned in whole or
acknowledgement of the change order.
part by the owner, architect, general contractor, Buyer or any of
19. INVOICES & PAYMENT: Invoices for materials sold hereunder will be
Buyer's subcontractors or materialmen or by any cause beyond
provided to Buyer monthly as material is fabricated. Payment is due 3(
Seller's control, including, without limitation, failure of Buyer to return
days from date of invoice unless other terms are specifically agreed to it
approved shop drawings to Seller on schedule, strikes, lockouts, fire,
writing. Payments are due within thirty (30) days of invoice. date whethe
embargoes, war, terrorists attacks or other outbreaks or hostilities,
or NOT delivery of material has been made and whether or NOT Buye
inability of Seller to obtain shipping space, governmental acts and
has been paid by the owner or other Contractor. Failure of Buyer to pa,
regulations, accidents, acts of God, influenza or other sickness
Seller in accordance with the payment terms of this Agreement is c
outbreaks, or other conditions beyond Seller's control. In the event
breach and relieves Seller of the obligation to ship material to Buyer; afte
of any delay not excused as provided herein, Seller's liability shall
such breach by Buyer, Seller may require full payment in advance fo
be limited as provided for in paragraphs 2 and 4,
future delivery of materials to Buyer. It is agreed the buyer will pay Seller'
7. BUYER'S OBLIGATION TO INSPECT UPON DELIVERY. Buyer will
reasonable attorney's fees in any action for the collection of amount
inspect material before material is unloaded from the freight
due.
hauler, and will note in writing all visible damage on the freight
20. CANCELLATION OR RESTOCKING CHARGE: Orders cancelled by Buyer wi
receipt before the material is removed from freight hauler. Except
be subject to a cancellation or restocking charge. Charges will includ(
as to damage which is concealed at the time of inspection,
fabrication and/or administrative expense.
material unloaded without such written record of damage shall be
21. ASSIGNMENT: This agreement may NOT be assigned by Buyerwithout thf
deemed delivered in good condition. Concealed damage must
written consent of Seller.
be noted by Buyer in writing, with proper documentation, and must
22. SEVERABILITY: If any provision of this agreement is determined to bf
be reported by Buyer to Seiler within ten days of delivery.
unenforceable or invalid, the unenforceable or invalid part shall bE
8. FREIGHT: Freight rates have been established based upon current
deemed severed from this agreement, and the remaining portions of thi
fuel prices/surcharges. Seiler reserves the right to review fuel
agreement shall be carried out with the same force as if the severe(
prices/surcharges in the event the project is delayed through no
portions had NOT been part of this agreement.
fault of Seller. Changes will be communicated via Change
23. APPLICABLE LAW: This agreement shall be governed by the laws of th(
Authorization and fully executed prior to shipment.
State of Minnesota.
9. BUYER'S OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY SELLER: In claims by any third
24. FORUM SELECTION: Both parties agree to bring suit only in the Minnesotc
party in any action or proceeding wherein it Is determined that
state court located in the County of Stearns, State of Minnesota. BOTI
Seller is at fault, this paragraph does not require indemnity by the
PARTIES CONSENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE DISTRIC
Buyer. However, in any other action or proceeding by a third party
COURT, STEARNS COUNTY, FOR ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES ARISING OU
in which a third party makes a claim against Seller and It is
OF THIS AGREEMENT. Violation of this covenant will bar recovery b
determined that Seller is not at fault, then and in that event, Buyer
BUYER In any other court.
shall indemnify the Seller and hold the Seller harmless from any and
25, CREDIT AVAILABILITY: Should credit availability be granted by Seller, o
all such claims. In any action by a third party wherein fault is
decisions with respect to the extension or continuation of credit shall b,
apportioned between Buyer and Seller, each party shall be
the sole discretion of Seller. Seller may terminate any credit availabilit
responsible only for the portion of the fault attributed to it. This
within its sole discretion.
agreement is not for the benefit of any third party.
26. EO Clause: When applicable, the contractor and subcontractor sha
10. BACK CHARGES: Buyer agrees that Buyer will NOT have the right
abide by the requirements of 41 CFR 60-1.4(a), 60-300.5(a), 60-741.5(c
of offset against the Agreement price or the right to back charge
and Appendix A of Subpart A of 29 CPR 471. These regulations prohib
the Agreement unless an officer of the Seller has agreed to such
discrimination against qualified individuals based on their status e
charges in writing.
protected veterans or individuals with disabilities, and prohib
11. LIEN WAIVERS: Seller will furnish interim partial lien waivers for
discrimination against all individuals based on their race, color, rellgioi
payments received. Seller agrees to furnish a final release of lien
sex, or national origin. Moreover, these regulations require that covere
upon receipt of final payment. Buyer acknowledges that Seller is
prime contractors and subcontractors take affirmative action to emplo
required by law to file pre -lien notices in certain states.
and advance in employment individuals without regard to race, colo
12. MATERIAL ONLY: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the
religion, sex, national origin, protected veteran status or disability.
Agreement Documents, Seller will provide only materials ready to
set and will not provide shelf angles, caulking, testing,
Form CS-031-01 (07Aug1 +,
engineering, support steel, mockups or setting.
Q
Packet Pg. 233
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/23/2016
Presentation of Bids and Award for Downtown Restroom (5 min.)
Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty
Department: Economic Development
Preparer: Patrick Doherty
Background/History
The Strategic Action Plan includes Action Item 3a.2 that reads as follows:
Develop a public restroom facility to serve pedestrians, customers, and tourists in the Downtown
district.
In pursuit of this Action Item, and in response to public demand, the City Council approved a preliminary
budget allocation of $260,000 in the 2016 budget to develop a Downtown restroom on the City -owned
parking lot adjacent to City Hall. That allocation was comprised of $110,000 from the General Fund,
$90,000 from REET 1, and $60,000 from the Lodging Tax Fund 120. In addition, the Edmonds Downtown
Alliance has committed $10,000, and the Noon Rotary Club has committed $5,000 (with a prospective
match by the Rotary District office of $5,000). On April 19, 2016 City Council approved an enhanced
restroom design that includes a unisex/family restroom, along with the associated costs, for a total cost
of $390,000 ($X total in City money) and approved purchase of the restroom unit from CXT, Inc.
Staff Recommendation
Staff will provide the bid results, construction budget and potential recommendation to award the
project during the staff presentation.
Narrative
On 8/3/16 the City issued a "Project Invitation" for bids from the MRSC Small Works Roster for site work
involving grading, new underground utilities, precast pavers, asphalt paving and patching, masonry,
carpentry, irrigation, landscaping, site restoration, and after -market architectural treatment of the
prefab restroom unit, per City -approved design. The engineer's estimate included in the Project
Invitation is $134,800. Bids were solicited through Noon, August 19, 2016 and will be presented at the
8/23/16 City Council meeting. Staff will review the low bidder's submittal to determine if it is complete
and acceptable prior to the City Council meeting.
Packet Pg. 234