2016-10-25 City Council - Full Agenda-17771.
2.
3.
4.
5
6
7.
8.
9.
10.
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
OCTOBER 25, 2016, 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of October 18, 2016
2. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
3. Authorization for Mayor to Sign an Amendment to Washington State Recreation and
Conservative Office Salmon Project
4. Authorization for Mayor to Sign Supplemental Agreement with Shannon & Wilson for the
Willow Creek Daylighting Project
5. Resolution of Intent to Assume the Duties of the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District and
setting a public hearing on November 15, 2016
AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON
THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS
STUDY ITEMS
1. Agreement For Wastewater Treatment, Disposal and Conveyance Services (35 min.)
2. Presentation of the Proposed 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvement Program
(30 minutes)
3. Discussion regarding the 2017 Proposed City Budget (60 min.)
REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETIINGS
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
COUNCIL COMMENTS
CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(1)
RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
October 25, 2016
Page 1
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of October 18, 2016
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Packet Pg. 2
4.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
October 18, 2016
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Kristiana Johnson, Council President
Michael Nelson, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
B. McIntyre, Police Officer
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir.
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Scott James, Finance Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Andrew Pierce, Legislative/Council Assistant
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5tn Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of
Councilmember Mesaros.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Councilmember Nelson said the Consent Agenda included an ordinance establishing the Multifamily
Family Tax Exemption Program which provides affordable housing incentives, a big deal for Edmonds,
and he thanked the Council for adopting it.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 11, 2016
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 1
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
2. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM ODELL HOBBS
($500,000.00)
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS
4. 2016 3RD QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENT
5. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BERGER ABAM FOR THE FISHING PIER
REHABILITATION PROJECT
6. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2015 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
7. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ADA CURB RAMP UPGRADES PROJECT ON 3RD
AVE
8. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
TO FUND MINOR UTILITY RELOCATIONS FOR THE MADRONA ELEMENTARY
WALKWAY PROJECT
9. ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC 8.64.68 - PARKING TIME LIMIT MODIFICATIONS
ON MAIN ST. BETWEEN 3RD AVE AND 2ND AVE & 2ND AVE BETWEEN MAIN ST.
AND BELL ST.
10. ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MULTI -FAMILY TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM
5. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
1. PRESENTATION BY DIVERSITY COMMISSION
Economic Development & Community Services Director Doherty introduced Pat Valle. Ms. Valle
provided background on the Diversity Commission, noting there is currently a vacancy:
• April 2015 — Diversity Commission Ordinance passed by City Council
• October 27, 2015 Mayor and City Council appointed total of 9 members:
o George Basioli
o Tung Bui
o Gayle Ketzel (now open)
o Maria Montalvo
o Diana White
o Mario Brown, Chair
o Ed Dorame, Vice Chair
o Adam Khan
o Pat Valle
Ms. Valle relayed the Commission's 2016 Work Plan:
• Mission Statement
o Promote and embrace diversity through action, education, and guidance; foster an
understanding that includes, accepts, respects and appreciates each individual member of our
community by:
o providing information, education, and communication that facilitates understanding of
diversity and to celebrate and respect individual differences;
o recommending to the Mayor and City Council opportunities to promote diversity programs,
and providing guidance to ensure an accessible, safe, welcoming and inclusive government
and community; and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 2
Packet Pg. 4
o supporting, challenging, and guiding government and the community to eliminate and prevent
all forms of discrimination
• Goals
o GOAL 1 - Increase the capacity of Commissioners
o GOAL 2 - Strive to develop a common community understanding of diversity and related
issues
o GOAL 3 - Create a public presence for the work of the Commission
Ms. Valle highlighted the Commission's accomplishments:
• Diversity Forum — April 6, 2016
o Representatives of organizations, agencies and other groups serving the full spectrum of
diverse communities in the greater Snohomish County area.
o Intention was to learn about existing network of groups and services in our communities,
thereby helping to identify opportunities for partnership, complementary programs and/or
unmet demand
o Approximately 30 attendees with great participation and commentary
• Fourth of July Parade Diversity contingent
• Announcements by Diversity Commission on City's Facebook page
• Diversity Commission quarterly column in Edmonds Beacon
• Identified need for more diversity depicted in tourism advertising, leading Economic
Development Department to commission new photo shoot with models representing greater
community diversity
• Immigrant and Refugee Forum — October 12, 2016
She highlighted upcoming events:
• "World Cafe ' community cultural conversation, tentatively planned for late fall
• Youth Diversity Engagement Event — in planning for mid -winter
Council President Johnson said she has attended and enjoyed all the Diversity Commission's events. She
pointed out each commission in the City can have a student representative. The position is open to any
high school or college student living in Edmonds. She suggested the Youth Diversity Engagement may be
an opportunity to identify a student interested in that position.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented the 2017 budget includes $6,000 plus $3,000 for Diversity
Commission and asked if that was sufficient, recognizing the good work the Diversity Commission has
done. Mr. Doherty said that is the same as the 2016 budget and covers a staff person 20 hours/month and
a budget for events. He advised last week's Immigrant and Refugee Forum was taped and will be posted
on the Diversity Commission's web page.
Councilmember Teitzel said certain segments of Edmonds' population, such as immigrants with language
and cultural issues, may view the City as a monolithic, intimidating entity. He was hopeful the Diversity
Commission could become a friendly front door to them and asked if people with language or cultural
issues have approached the commission. Ms. Valle said she has not seen people approaching the Diversity
Commission directly. She relayed a commissioner's idea to create a postcard -size questionnaire/survey
with an opportunity for comment and questions such as what services they need, their first impression of
Edmonds, etc. The Diversity Commission has extensively discussed how to encourage residents of the
bowl and people of color who live along Highway 99 to mingle more regularly and comfortably. She was
encouraged by Councilmember Teitzel's question because it invites discussion about future actions/steps
the Diversity Commission can take and indicates the commission is on the right track.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 3
Packet Pg. 5
4.1.a
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented it was a pleasure to be the Council liaison to the Diversity
Commission. The commission is developing cardstock to display in public places like the library, City
Hall, etc. that provides information on the Diversity Commission. There are plan to also display the cards
in places on the east side of Edmonds which is more diverse.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled at the Immigration and Refugee Forum the presenter
congratulated the Edmonds on having a population that is 78% Caucasian and 22% non -Caucasian and
commented the non -Caucasian population is growing annually.
Councilmember Nelson thanked the Diversity Commission for their mission of acceptance, respect and
celebrating diversity, a breath of fresh air in the current political climate. He found the commission's first
event, the Diversity Forum, eye opening and asked whether the commission planned to follow-up with
those organizations or hold another Diversity Forum next year. Ms. Valle said the commission plans to
host another Diversity Forum and to follow-up with the organizations, particularly the 3-4 who made a
definite ask. She commented because the commission is such a diverse group, it has sometimes been a
struggle to feel comfortable but commissioners are beginning to gel. She will pursue the idea of follow-up
with those organizations with the commission.
Mayor Earling thanked Ms. Valle for her presentation and for her service.
2. HEARING EXAMINER REPORT
Hearing Examiner Phil Olbrechts explained since his last report, he has had only four hearings. Ironically,
this month he is holding four hearings. Mr. Olbrechts reviewed his report:
Blomenkamp Judicial Remand (8/30/16): Decision revised upon judicial remand to require that
required replacement trees have a minimum caliper of three inches in addition to a condition already
requiring the trees be at least ten feet in height.
In 2015, Mr. Blomenkamp requested redress via ECDC 20.40.100 for damage to several large trees on his
property caused by a development on adjoining property that damaged his tree roots on that adjoining
property. The examiner determined that Mr. Blomenkamp was entitled to relief under ECDC 20.40.100.
Unfortunately, ECDC 20.40.100 did not provide any standards on how damage to Mr. Blomenkamp's
trees should be remedied. Recognizing that it wasn't feasible and likely not even possible to replace 100+
foot trees with trees of similar height, the examiner looked to other parts of the code for guidance on what
could be feasibly required of a developer to remedy tree damage. The only code standards that suggested
what type of tree heights may be available at a nursery was the City's landscaping standards, which
included maximum tree heights of ten feet. The examiner also looked to ECDC 18.45.075 for an objective
standard on tree replacement ratios, which requires three replacement trees for every tree damaged by a
developer in violation of the City's clearing and grading standards. Based upon these code standards, the
examiner required the developer to replace each damaged tree with three trees of the same species at least
ten feet in height. Mr. Blomenkamp appealed the decision to Snohomish County Superior Court based
upon a wide range of issues. The superior court sustained the examiner's 12-page decision on all points
with the proviso that the replacement trees should have a minimum caliper of three inches as also required
by ECDC 18.45.075. The examiner's 8/30/16 remand decision added the three-inch caliper requirement to
the examiner's final Blomenkamp decision as required by the superior court. Unique provision, staff
working on making more consistent with case law.
Mr. Olbrechts commented this subject is a legal minefield, referring to a court decision in April, Mustoe
v. Ma, that determined it is not a nuisance if someone cuts trespassing tree roots even if it damages the
tree roots on the adjoining property. He said if this issue arose again, that case would need to be addressed
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 4
Packet Pg. 6
4.1.a
in determining whether it was a nuisance. He recognized this is a unique provision in Edmonds' code and
staff is working on making the code consistent with applicable case law.
City of Edmonds Downtown Public Restroom (7/20/16): Approved. Variance and conditional use
permit to install a prefabricated 520 square foot 11-foot high public restroom building in the north parking
lot of City Hall. The variance was for waiver of eight development standards, including minimum height,
allowed uses, access and landscaping as well as four design standards (one of which required transparent
windows).
Dietz Critical Areas Reasonable Use (4/7/16): Approved. The applicant requested a reasonable use
waiver to a 100-foot critical areas buffer of Shell Creek in order to build a home with a 336 square foot
footprint at 742 Daily Street. To assure that functions and values of the creek would not be compromised,
the proposal involved 1,617 square feet of stream buffer enhancement with native trees and shrubs, a five-
year monitoring plan, a fence to prevent further encroachment into the stream buffer and notice on title. A
prior reasonable use request by Jordan Schenk for the same property had been denied in 2014 for a
proposed home with a building footprint of 626 square feet. One primary reason for the Schenk denial
was the inclusion of a large second story overhang that threatened to block sunlight to surrounding stream
vegetation. The Dietz proposal contains no overhang and is significantly smaller than the Schenk home
proposed in 2014. Staff recommended approval of the Dietz application and denial of the Schenk
application. Minimum reasonable use was premised on the minimum building footprint necessary to
accommodate a two -car garage. The recent trend in "tiny houses" with livable space of 120 square feet or
less may be grounds for further limiting building area in reasonable use applications.
Bridge Animal Referral Center (3/4/16): Approved. Conditional use permit to operate a 24-hour
veterinary clinic that specializes in cancer specialty care in an existing building located at 8401 Main
Street. The surrounding area is primarily single-family residential with some BN zoned property to the
north, including a veterinary clinic. Neighbors expressed concern over noise caused by barking dogs and
late night parking. The applicant was very conscientious about addressing neighborhood concerns and
proposed numerous design measures for the interior of the building that reduced noise impacts.
Edmonds Public Works Noise Variance (2/11/16): Noise variance approved. The City's Public Works
department requested a variance to nighttime noise limits for five nonconsecutive nights for sewer
maintenance project on SR 99 between 216th and 220th Streets SW.
Council President Johnson referred to the Dietz reasonable use waiver, commenting at some point staff
proposed selling the property to adjoining property owners. Mr. Olbrechts said he was aware staff asked
adjoining property owners if they were willing to buy the property to avoid a reasonable use request. City
Attorney Jeff Taraday explained part of the analysis done leading up to the hearing before the Hearing
Examiner was to evaluate what efforts had been made to make reasonable use of the property. If there had
been interested parties willing to purchase the property such as neighbors who would not have needed to
build on the property and make it part of their yard, that would have allowed for reasonable use of the
property without additional construction. That analysis was necessary to determine whether the applicant
could meet the criterion. Mr. Olbrechts commented the selling price of property was $20,000; if the
neighbors did not want a house on the property, that would have been a moderately painful way to avoid
it. He commented the $20,000 selling price when lots are typically $200,000 made it difficult to assess the
reasonable use.
Council President Johnson said had the Council been asked, she was certain the Council would have been
very interested in this purchasing property as it would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the
affordable price would allow it to be purchased using Council Contingency funds and more importantly it
is located along a fish -bearing creek where there have been many donations of property. She asked how to
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 5
Packet Pg. 7
4.1.a
ensure in the future that the Council is offered opportunities to purchase property like this, particularly
since the Council is no longer in a quasi-judicial position. She would have loved for the Council to have
been offered an opportunity to purchase this property. Mr. Taraday answered it is tricky because the City
is regulating this property. If the City is trying to regulate property at same time it is trying to purchase
the property, the City is liable to be charged with purposefully overregulating the property out of an
interest in acquiring it at low price. It is one thing if the property owner unilaterally initiates an offer to
the City, but when an application for development is already pending, that makes it very difficult to enter
into negotiations with the property owner. He said staff could give that some additional thought but it was
a very tricky situation. Council President Johnson said she figured it would be but given this situation, she
wanted to know if anything could be done by ordinance or resolution for the Council to be included in the
potential purchase of a property when it is offered to adjoining neighbors. Mr. Olbrechts suggested a
proactive citywide program that identified property the City would like to buy before development
applications are submitted.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to the Blomenkamp case, relaying he had visited the site and seen the
grading and the trees that were damaged very close to the property line on the west side of the
development. He asked whether Mr. Olbrechts' order specified where the replacement trees would be
planted relative to the property line. Mr. Olbrechts said the trees were to be planted in the same location.
It was his understanding that Mr. Blomenkamp has not pursued that yet because the decision is under
appeal.
If the trees are 10 feet tall when planted, reaching 30-40 feet in 10 years with the root structure expanding
accordingly, Councilmember Teitzel asked whether Mr. Blomenkamp would have any liability if the root
structure damaged the bulkhead on the property line. Mr. Olbrechts said when the trees are planted, that
would be something Mr. Blomenkamp would need to consider. If a property owner's tree roots trespass
onto someone's property and cause damage, the property owner is responsible. Councilmember Teitzel
observed that would be true even though Mr. Blomenkamp's trees were there before the development
occurred. Mr. Olbrechts referred to the Mustoe v. Ma case where the court considered the roots to be
trespassing. To be fair, someone could not be told they could not develop their property because an
adjoining property owner's tree roots infringe on the entire area but by the same token, he was surprised
the court did not delve into what happens if tree roots are cut and tree falls on the neighbor's house,
whether it would be okay to cut tree roots in that case. Reading that case literally, it seems like that is
what it says but he imagined to the point a hazardous situation is created, it could not be taken that far.
According to that decision, short of that, a property owner has the right to get rid of roots on their
property. Councilmember Teitzel summarized it would be important that the new trees be sited in such a
way that they likely won't cause damage to the bulkhead which may require moving them westward. Mr.
Olbrechts said there was flexibility in his decision regarding the location of the trees.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Dietz critical area reasonable use and asked if this was the
same property in the Steve Schaefer et al closed record review. Mr. Taraday answered no. Mr. Olbrechts
said the applicant in 2002 was Schenk. Councilmember Buckshnis commented in a critical area no house
was better than a tiny house.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out to the City's Planning Department that tiny houses are
starting to pop up in various places. She commented her 20-something niece who is a communication
professional and a minimalist is building one in her front yard in Portland and plans to rent out her house.
She suggested the City think about what do about tiny houses, envisioning it will come up more often in
the future.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 6
Packet Pg. 8
4.1.a
Natalie Shippen, Edmonds, referred to comments during audience comments at the October 11 meeting
made by a group of shop owners from the Downtown Business Alliance that the revised sign code is
harmful to their businesses. The second speaker identified her by name and claimed that she chastised
shop owners in front of their customers which Ms. Shippen assured she had not done. She understood that
people who speak during audience comments are not sworn to tell the truth but the Council must take
their statements seriously. To obtain complete testimony, she requested the woman who made that charge
publicly name for the Council the shop owners whom she alleges were chastised and embarrassed. She
assured she reserved her chastisements for City Council in regard to that legislation.
Joe Scordino, Edmonds, retired fishery biologist, speaking for a large number citizens concerned about
future of Edmonds Marsh, said the group agreed to have one speaker to limit the meeting time they
consumed. At his request, numerous people in audience who supported his statements stood. He said the
group present in the audience is only a portion of the people who are signatories to a letter sent to various
entities and is increasing in number. He relayed the group's support for the draft letter to Ecology
regarding the Shoreline Master Program; the group thanks the Council for using BAS in setting the 110-
foot buffer plus 15-foot setback for the Edmonds Marsh and assures the community supports the decision.
They understand the 110-foot buffer will need to be approved by Ecology and are committed to engaging
with Ecology on having the 110-foot buffer supported. Their email to Ecology demonstrates their
commitment to begin engaging with Ecology on approving buffer. The group sent a letter to all the
property owners around the Edmonds Marsh about the need to preserve and enhance the marsh. He urged
the Council to consider the group's request to establish a task force consisting of the property owners as
well as concerned citizens and organizations such as the Pilchuck Audubon Society to begin working on
measures to prevent further degradation of the marsh and to develop plans for enhancing the marsh for the
enjoyment of future generations. The group of concerned citizens is prepared to follow-up with the Port
of Edmonds, WSDOT, BNSF, Chevron and the City to begin working on preserving and enhancing the
marsh.
Scott Blomenkamp, Edmonds, said Mr. Olbrechts' report was inaccurate, 12 counts were not approved,
one was remanded. He referred to Section 18.45.075, a redress for removal of trees, which states up to
three trees of sufficient caliber to adequately replace the tree removed. He questioned whether the Council
thought a 42-inch caliber tree was adequately replaced by three 3-inch trees. If that was the will of the
Council, he recommended changing the code to state the size of tree that was necessary, not the
minimum. He referred to the Council's interest in critical areas, suggesting citizens' property was also
important. With regard to the Mustoe v. Ma case, he said it did not address RCW 64.12.030, the state
statute regarding timber trespass. There have been two cases regarding roots with BNSF. He remarked
this case has cost the City a considerable amount for something that could have been addressed at the
Hearing Examiner level. There still has not been any discussion regarding Section 20.100.040 which
refers to code sections that no longer exist such as 20.91 and 20.100.030.
Marlin Phelps, Edmonds, commented the City plays with unicorns and butterflies and looked the other
way because there is no graffiti, vagrants or wild children playing in the streets. The Council has allowed
the Police Department to manifest into a vile, violent monster with no regard. In his 107`h hearing last
Monday, the judge ordered another competency evaluation; yet his 4th grade and 6th grade teachers went
out of their way to tell his mom he was the best student they had had in 30 years. At 18 years old, he
moved to Arizona and attended UTI, graduating at 19 and at 20 he became the first and youngest
instructor to receive a perfect evaluation. He assured he is a competent man and has a wonderful parrot
left to him by his aunt. He suggested googling Einstein the Parrot, who has nothing on his parrot who can
draw a graph. He suggested the Council would be subject to the court of public opinion next; people hate
it when their family member is maliciously prosecuted in 107 hearings. He asserted the Police broke his
arm; he still does not know why because he was innocent. It is the Council's job to make the law apply
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 7
Packet Pg. 9
4.1.a
and Judge Linda Coburn needs to adhere to the constitution; he deserves his constitutional rights in the
courtroom.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said a 110-foot buffer is too much, gives no consideration to the Harbor
Square property and the Council has created a problem. He referred to last week's question about the
Multimodal Fund and was surprised by staff s response that they did not know but thought it was okay.
He requested an explanation be provided regarding that fund and what staff discovered regarding its
creation, its purpose and whether the funds could be placed in the General Fund. He referred to the
Mayor's Advisory Committee on the At -Grade Crossing which included considerations of the original
multimodal facility which may be the only way to get ferry traffic across the tracks. He suggested holding
funds with that designation until the Task Force's recommendation is presented to the Council. He
concluded his comments stating the sound system in Council Chambers is terrible, he cannot hear
whether in the audience or watching on TV.
Alex Witenberg, Edmonds, thanked Public Works Director Phil Williams and Public Works staff for
providing sand and sandbags over the weekend. He and his dad filled sandbags in anticipation of the
apocalyptic storm that did not materialize. Providing sand and sandbags was a great service for citizens
and had the storm have been as bad as advertised, the sandbags would have been needed.
7. ACTION ITEMS
1. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE
Senior Planner Kernen Lien relayed the Council has been working through the Shoreline Master Plan
(SMP) responses to Ecology required changes. He identified the first three exhibits in the Council packet:
• Exhibit 1: Cover letter summarizing the City's responses to Ecology's required changes and one
recommended change.
• Exhibit 2: Table of the eight required changes proposed by Ecology and the City Council's
responses and rationale
• Exhibit 3: Memo prepared by the City Attorney with rationale for Required Change #7 and the
buffer and setback around the marsh.
Mr. Lien sought Council feedback on whether staff accurately captured the Council decisions on those
eight items. If so, he recommended the Council vote tonight and if there were any changes, they could be
brought back next week for a final review.
Councilmember Buckshnis commended Mr. Lien for his work and said staff had captured everything she
has said over the last three years.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked Mr. Lien for his yeoman's work. He referred to the second page of
Exhibit 1, the cover letter and the paragraph that begins "Finally." The second sentence in the paragraph
states this is not the appropriate time to consider residential development because current zoning does not
allow it. He suggested that statement goes too far, pointing out this item is not a required change by
Ecology but only a recommendation. As such, the Council is only required to acknowledge receipt of the
recommendation and not justify any particular action.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
AMEND THE PARAGRAPH TO READ: "FINALLY THE CITY ACKNOWLEDGES
ECOLOGY'S RECOMMENDED CHANGE TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE URBAN MIXED USE IV ENVIRONMENT BUT DECLINES TO IMPLEMENT
THIS CHANGE AT THIS TIME. HOWEVER7, THE COUNCIL DOES NOT FEEL THIS IS THE
APPROPRIATE, T-2104-E, TO CONSIDER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTICUL A R1 V
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 8
Packet Pg. 10
4.1.a
Councilmember Tibbott agreed more information than required was included in the letter and he would be
satisfied with inserting a period after the comma. He found the explanation in the table excellent, a good
clarification that explains the principle. He preferred not to include any nuance explanations in the letter
to keep it simple and clear.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas did not support the motion as the explanation provided the rationale.
Councilmember Teitzel said the sentence "However, the Council does not feel this is the appropriate time
to consider residential development, particularly since the current zoning of Harbor Square site does not
permit residential development." while true, may signal the Council is prejudging a potential application
in the future which he wanted to avoid. An application may or may not be received in the future and he
did not find that language necessary. As that item is a recommendation from Ecology, not a requirement,
he preferred not to go there.
Council President Johnson recognized the benefit of the proposed amendment. Regardless of whether the
motion passed, she said it is the current contract rezone that does not allow residential development so
that would be a more accurate statement.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION ENDED IN A TIE (3-3); COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS
NELSON, BUCKSHNIS AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
Mr. Taraday advised as this was not a vote on an ordinance, resolution or payment, Mayor Earling could
vote to break the tie.
MAYOR EARLING VOTED YES AND THE MOTION CARRIED (4-3).
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, FOR APPROVAL.
Councilmember Tibbott expressed concern the letter to Ecology does not reference the dissenting votes
particularly related to the setbacks which seems to indicate the entire Council was in complete agreement
with regard to the setback. He assumed the intent of the letter was to capture the outcome, however, it
would be more accurate if there were some indication related to the dissenting votes especially regarding
the setbacks which has been a very important part of SMP discussion. He had several questions related to
that issue, including whether there had ever been a place in the Puget Sound region where a buffer of that
size in an urban environment had ever been restored. The City is about to embark on a very ambiguous
program that gives preference to very large existing pieces of infrastructure such as the railroad and
highway which puts other private property owners at a disadvantage.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas raised a point of order. Mayor Earling requested Councilmember Tibbott
speak to the motion. Councilmember Tibbott said the letter to Ecology does not reference that there was
some dissent related to the recommendations and that there were serious questions remaining. Mr. Lien
responded his intent with the letter was to capture the Council's actions, not all the Council's various
opinions.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether letters, ordinances, etc. state who supported or opposed
an action. City Attorney Jeff Taraday responded as a general rule the Council acts by majority vote
whether it is a 4-0, 7-0 or 4-3 vote. Ordinances themselves do not record the vote; the vote is reflected in
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 9
Packet Pg. 11
4.1.a
the minutes of the meeting where action was taken. Mayor Earling said the Council is not voting on an
ordinance, the decision is approving a letter to be sent to Ecology.
Councilmember Teitzel recognized his was a minority opinion but he continued to be very disturbed
about where the Council was headed. The Council was on the cusp of sending a letter to Ecology
recommending a 110-foot buffer and a 15-foot setback although the Port of Edmonds has been clear that
will not work for them for redevelopment. If the Council submits the letter and Ecology accepts the
Council's recommendation, the City is locked into a buffer that is not workable.
Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas and Buckshnis raised a point of order that Councilmember Teitzel was
not speaking to the motion and was rehashing what the Council has discussed for the past six weeks.
Mayor Earling requested Councilmember Teitzel speak to the motion. Councilmember Teitzel said he
was stating the reason he did not support the letter as written. Although he would dearly love to see the
marsh restored, he was concerned that this letter if adopted will not have that result and will result in
decades of the status quo with Harbor Square continuing exactly as it is with the same dimensions which
is not good for the marsh or the City. For those reasons, in good conscience, he could not support the
proposed letter.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the letter, stating the Council cannot look into a crystal
ball and see what will happen in the next ten years. She objected to Councilmembers continuing to
belabor and rehash opinions that have been previously stated.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. VOTE ON CALL FOR THE
QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING NO.
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess.
8. STUDY ITEMS
1. AMENDMENT TO WASHINGTON STATE RECREATION AND CONSERVATIVE
OFFICE SALMON PROJECT
Keeley O'Connell, Project Manager, explained a grant was awarded to the City by the Recreation and
Conservation Office (RCO) in 2014, but there has not been a need to utilize the funding on the
daylighting project until this year. RCO has requested the City consider a scope of work change related to
a possible alternative alignment of the daylight channel that would be more beneficial to habitat and
salmon. Staff agreed with that suggestion which is the reason for this amendment. Along with an
alternative alignment, RCO requested the City also study water quality and soil quality in the marsh as it
pertains to fish access and exposure. The scope has been rewritten and submitted to RCO. Staff
recommends approval of the amendment to allow staff to proceed with the revised scope of work.
Councilmember Nelson asked why RCO requested the City consider an alternative alignment. Ms.
O'Connell explained during a site visit in February 2016 for a different round of funding, RCO and staff
were looking at the proposed straight alignment along railroad tracks across the Unocal property, the
alignment initially considered as it pertained to the Edmonds Crossing project. As an opportunity
presented itself for that property to potentially have some flexibility, RCO requested the City consider an
alternative alignment that would move it away from the railroad tracks and allow for some buffer. In the
current alignment, there is no space on the west side between the channel and the railroad tracks for any
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 10
Packet Pg. 12
4.1.a
buffer. Consideration of the alternative alignment will include the City having a stakeholder conversation
with WSDOT Ferries Division to obtain a memorandum of understanding between the City and Ferries
with regard to which alignment could move forward into design. Understandably, the State does not want
to pay for design work on a channel that will never happen so they first want to determine the alternatives
available followed by a conversation between the City and Ferries.
Councilmember Nelson asked if she foresaw that extending the timeline of daylighting Willow Creek.
Ms. O'Connell responding she did not think it would extend the timeline; the grant work would be
completed by approximately June 2016 which would not push out the daylighting. The project still has a
way to go toward implementation including a fair amount of fundraising plus the Unocal property is
currently not available under the existing property owner, Chevron, and it is uncertain when that property
will transfer to the State.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented she has had the pleasure of attending meetings with the scientists.
She suggested inviting the Council to the event this weekend and recommended scheduling this for
approval on the Consent Agenda.
Councilmember Tibbott inquired about the source of funding. Ms. O'Connell explained this grant was
awarded by RCO from the Salmon Recovery Funding Board. This scope of work will use the funds
awarded in 2014 and the City will apply for future funding with RCO. RCO has been clear they want an
agreement between the City and Ferries regarding the alignment that would be designed before they will
award the City additional funds for design. Councilmember Tibbott clarified the existing grant will cover
the additional work. Ms. O'Connell agreed the proposed scope of work would be funded via the grant and
the required match.
Councilmember Tibbott observed Chevon owns both the alignment along the railroad track as well as the
new alignment that will be considered. Ms. O'Connell responded the existing alignment is owned by the
City; the new alignment would be across the Unocal which today is owned by Chevron with the intent it
will be owned by the State in the future. Councilmember Tibbott asked whether the current property
owners would be agreeable to the alternative alignment. Ms. O'Connell responded Chevron has indicated
they are not because they have no interest in the property once it is cleaned up and Ecology allows them
to transfer it which has been the intent for multiple decades. The new identified property owner, WSDOT
Ferries Division, is open to those conversations. Councilmember Tibbott agreed it was great idea to study
the alternative alignment, particularly since it would provide more buffer.
Councilmember Teitzel asked whether the cleanup of the Unocal site would have any effect on the design
of the channel and how whether it effects when work could commence. Ms. O'Connell responded the
cleanup should not impact the ultimate design of the channel, based on the extensive cleanup that has
been done to date. Ongoing monitoring has continued to identify hot spots; Ecology has required Chevron
to develop a plan to manage those hot spots and remove the contaminated material. There is no reason to
think there is a large amount of unidentified contamination still on the site once Ecology acknowledges
Chevron has completed the cleanup and can transfer the property. Contingencies have been included in
the budget for implementation because of unknowns that can be encountered on a contaminated site. She
did not anticipate the timing would be impacted and the cleanup process would have no impact on the
alignment. The alignment will be based on what is the most habitat friendly and still work within the
needs of the site.
Councilmember Teitzel asked whether the dredging of the new channel could begin before the cleanup
was completed. Ms. O'Connell answered it could not because the property would not transfer to the State
prior to completion of the cleanup and Chevron would not work with City to make that alignment happen
sooner.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 11
Packet Pg. 13
4.1.a
Council President Johnson relayed her understanding that the original alignment was along the pipe and
the new alignment proposed for study would be where water would naturally flow if not in a pipe. Ms.
O'Connell answered yes, although none of this was very natural because the downtown core and the area
had been altered so much that none of the creek alignment was similar to what existed historically.
However, an alignment that was pulled away from the railroad tracks even 50 feet would allow for more
sinuosity in the channel which could add habitat complexity and allow for some buffer.
It was the consensus of Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda.
2. PRESENTATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH SHANNON & WILSON
FOR THE WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PROJECT
Keeley O'Connell, Project Manager, explained this is the agreement to utilize the funding in the previous
agenda item to amend the contract with Shannon & Wilson to consider the alternative alignment, do water
quality and soil quality sampling and reporting and be available to the City for the conversations with
WSDOT Ferries in the next round of fund in mid-2017.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to Task 3, Sediment and Stormwater sampling and reporting, advising
that the EWHS Stream Team has been doing stormwater sampling. He asked whether the results of the
sampling done by Shannon & Wilson would be compared with the Steam Team's results. Ms. O'Connell
answered that would be the intent; this additional research/sampling can be used to verify past sampling
as well as will include sampling of sites not being sampled by the Students Saving Salmon group. She
anticipated the additional sampling would create a more robust data set.
It was the consensus of Council to schedule approval on the Consent Agenda.
3. PARK IMPACT FEES REPORT
Finance Director Scott James presented the Park Impact Fees Report:
• In late 2013 the City began collecting Park Impact Fees.
• RCW and City Code Section 3.36 states that the Impact Fees must be used for capital
• improvements to parks facilities that will benefit the new growth and development.
• Once collected, the City has 10 years to spend the funds.
• Park Impact Fees are to be used for public improvements that will increase overall capacity and
benefit new development. For example:
o Publicly owned parks and open space.
o Capital equipment in parks and open space, such as playgrounds, restrooms, or parking
facilities.
o Increasing waterfront access.
o Increasing connectivity, such as adding bike lanes and trails
• Park Impact Fees are not to be used for projects that are for maintenance or ongoing operations,
or that do not increase capacity. For example:
o Correcting deficiencies in existing public facilities.
o Daylighting of Willow Creek.
o Purchase of maintenance equipment such as lawn mowers, tractors, or other vehicles.
• Park Impact Fees Collected
2013 $2,934
2014 $203,503
2015 $129,340
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 12
Packet Pg. 14
4.1.a
2016 (to date) $335,223
Total Fees Collected $671,000
Less Amount Expended $0
Total Available to Spend $671,000
The City has collected $246,649 from single- and multi -family dwellings and $424,351 from
commercial projects.
The Parks Department has programmed $500,000 of this money to be spent in 2017 out of the
Capital Fund to support the Waterfront Redevelopment project.
o This project will open up more access to the waterfront in front of the Senior Center, and will
complete the Waterfront Walkway
Councilmember Teitzel asked whether Park Impact Fees could be used for the new restroom at Civic
Field. Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite answered Park Impact Fees can be used for some of the
development of Civic Field because the project will add capacity to a current park. Park Impact Fees can
be used to purchase park land, develop new parks and/or add capacity to current parks to accommodate
growth.
4. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE 2017 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET
Mayor Earling requested Council hold questions until staff completed their presentation. Public Works
Director Phil Williams explained Public Works is a collection of funds and divisions. The presentation
will include the three utilities: stormwater, water and sewer; roads (Fund 111 - street maintenance and
112 - street construction); administrative, engineering, facilities and fleet. He displayed a picture of the
award -winning Five Corners roundabout, advising on November 1 WSDOT will present the City the
Director's Award, a statewide competition.
Mr. Williams reviewed Public Works Utilities:
2016 Accomplishments
Stormwater
o C/B's serviced 2,922 of 6,702
o M/H's serviced 639 of 1,491
o Total structures serviced 3,561 of 8,193 (43.5%)
0 2,810 ft. new storm lines installed
o Completed the 60% design of the Dayton St. Pump Station
o Completed the 30% design of the utility improvements on Dayton 3rd to 9tb
o Construction completed on 105`h/106`h Ave SW storm project
o Began preliminary (30%) design for the Willow Creek Daylight Project
o Completed the Stormwater Management Code Update
o Will complete the LID Integration code update by 12/16
o Completed the 30% design of the Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
Water
0 4,825 ft of water main replacement
0 3,400 linear feet of pavement overlay on City streets
o New Water Comprehensive Plan 95% complete by year-end
Sewer
0 2,000 ft of sewer main replacement
0 6,400 ft of CIPP Sewer re -lining
o LS#1 Pump Station Metering and Flow Study complete by year-end
0 1,075 linear feet of pavement overlay on City streets
o Completed ESCO #4 at WWTP — energy efficient blowers, nozzles and baffles in ABs
o Will complete Clarifier #3 floor repair at the WWTP
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 13
Packet Pg. 15
4.1.a
Combined
o Completed the 3rd year of a six -year rate adjustment package to achieve debt independence
for pipe installs and rehabs
o Last three years are 2017-2019 (Public Hearing 11/1/2016)
2017 Utility Budget issues
o Three-year rate adjustment package
o Lake Ballinger Sewer Trunk Main Study (3rd qtr 2017)
0 2016 Water System Comprehensive Plan finalized and adopted
o Stormwater Comp Plan Update prepared in 2017
0 5-Corners Reservoir re-coating/re-plumbing, roof repair ($1.8M)
0 7,300 ft. new water lines, 2,900 ft. new sewer lines, 3,000 ft. CIPP — Total Utility Capital -
$14.7M
o ESCO Project #5 at WWTP — replace belt filter presses with screw conveyors ($1.905M)
o Complete SCADA Controls Project ($223k)
o Total Utility Capital Projects: $14.7 million
Decision packages (DP) 60-72 ($439,810)
o DP62: $25k - Truck -mounted air compressor (421)
o DP63: $50k - Storm code training and outreach (422)
o DP64: $65k - Increased NPDES Phase 11 permit compliance costs (422)
o DP66: $15k - Emergency generator plugs for lift stations (423)
o DP67: $20k - Fall protection equipment — lift stations (423)
o DP68: $15k - Replacement push camera (423)
o DP69: $75k - Replacement 50kw emergency generator (423)
o DP71: $35k - Convert five (5) replacement work trucks to propane use
o DP72: $115k - Replace 1957 PW Operations building emergency generator
o DP60-70: $21,810
Expenditures
2016
2016 YE
Expenditures
Modified
Estimate
2017 Budget
Discussion
Budget
Utilities — Water,
$38,695,620
$32,220,230
$35,236,370
Three-year rate
Sewer, Stormwater
package decision
Mr. Williams reviewed Public Works Roads — Fund 111 and 112
2016 Accomplishments
o Pavement Preservation — 8.7 lane miles ($1.4M)
o Construction completed on 228th St/76th Ave Improvements (total cost $7.8M)
o Completed 238th St. new sidewalk, rain gardens, storm system, and paving
o Construction will be completed on 236th St. walkway ($717,000)
o Design completed on 76th/212th Intersection Improvements and corridor striping, bids too
high, new TIB grant applied for — Spring bid - construction in 2017 (Total Project Cost
$8.3M)
o Waterfront Access/At-grade crossing study completed ($690,000)
o Trackside (Wayside) Warning Horn System completed by year-end $300,000
Challenges/Opportunities 2017
o Pavement Preservation - $1,100,000 new money for 2017 — 6.5 lane miles +
o $900,000 for 1 lane -mile on 84th (grant funded) + 1 lane mile from utilities - Total 7.5 lane
miles
o Determine next steps in Waterfront Access Study
o Need to continue replacing/upgrading signal cabinets $70,000/year
o Discuss new TBD Authorities
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 14
Packet Pg. 16
4.1.a
Decision Packages / Changes
o DP39:
Waterfront At -Grade Crossing Design Development - $150,000 (GF)
o DP44:
212th St. Ped crossing lights at EWHS replacement - $20,000 (111)
o DP45:
Replace two (2) signal cabinets - $70,000(111)
o DP47:
220th St SW Traffic Signal coordination - $47,000 (112)
o DP48:
Audible Ped signals — ADA compliance - $20,000(112)
o DP49:
Minor sidewalk program - $100,000 (REET 1)
o DP50:
Pavement Preservation Program $1.1 million (REET 1 &2)
o DP51:
SR99 Access Management - $300,000 (BEET 1)
o DP52:
Traffic Calming - $20,000 (REET1)
o DP53:
ADA Curb Ramps - $25,000 (REET2)
o DP54:
Pavement Preservation Carry Forward - $165,000 (REET)
o DP40,43,46: CTR, Synchro & tree expenses - $14,500 (111&GF)
Expenditures
Expenditures
2016
2016 YE
2017 Budget
Discussion
Modified et
Est mate
Fund 111/112
1 $10,335,140
$7,000,828
10,909,216
Capital Driven
Mr. Williams reviewed Public Works Administration, Engineering, Facilities, Fleet:
• 2016 Accomplishments
Engineering
o Engineering Reviews (YTD September)
■ 335 Engineering permits were issued for right-of-way construction, sewer installation,
street use and encroachments.
■ 1800 inspections were performed by the Engineering Division
■ $108,500 collected in traffic impact fees
■ Permits were issued and inspections performed for numerous large development projects:
Point Edwards Building 10, Edmonds Post Office, Seabrook Plat (9th &
Caspers), Hyde Park Townhomes, Memory Care, and 7 short plats.
■ Permits were issued for 30 single family residential projects.
■ Permits were issued for over 250 additions/remodels & miscellaneous projects.
Fleet
o Purchased, equipped, and commissioned 10 new vehicles for Police - $363,000
o Three (3) new vehicles for Engineering - $81,000
o One vehicle for Development Services - $29,000
o Two (2) vehicles for the Street Department - $56,000
o Four (4) vehicles for Parks - $238,000
o Total = $767,000
o Converted 4 more vehicles to propane
o Will complete propane canopy over fueling station
o Broke even on the propane fueling program investment
o Continued the conversion to the Ford Explorer platform (5 in-service)
Facilities
o In-house remodel of Finance offices and Green Room construction
o ESCO IV for Library HVAC
o Meadowdale Clubhouse re -roofing project and Leaf Guard gutter system
o Audio Visual upgrades at City Council Chambers
o In -House Exterior painting of Old Public Works Building
o City Hall carpet replacement phase one
o Installation of Public Restroom and Plaza at exterior of City Hall
o In -House City Hall Fire Door repaired
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 15
Packet Pg. 17
4.1.a
o Frances Anderson Center floor repairs
o Senior Center Dental Van exterior electrical connection
Decision Packages/ Changes
Facilities DP30-42)
o DP41: Replace FAC Roof on gym and Oldest building - $350,000 (depends on capital
appropriation from legislature)
o DP42: Capital renewal projects on City buildings - $300,000 (REET1)
o DP30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37: Training, small equipment, vehicle main., overtime, etc. -
$40,500 (421,422,423,001)
Fleet
o DP71: Convert 5 new work trucks to Bi-Fuel propane - $35,000 (511)
o DP72: Replace Public Works Maintenance Facility emergency generator and install
automatic transfer switch - $115,000 (511)
o New Vehicles
0 10 New Vehicles, 2 small equipment
■ (2) Police staff vehicles ($64K)
■ (3) Police patrol vehicles ($180K)
■ Street 40ft bucket truck ($135)
■ Street utility truck ($60K)
■ Street flatbed truck ($49K)
■ Parks flatbed trucks ($92K)
■ Parks equipment (mowers)
Mr. Williams displayed a reviewed a graph of the City's Capital Program 2008-2017, highlighting 2017
totals:
• Fund 423 Sewer: $ 5,135,070
• Fund 422 Storm: $ 4,058,099
• Fund 421 Water: $ 5,517,640
• Fund 112: $ 7,062,022
• Parks: $ 3,595,000
• General Fund Total: $25,637,830
Mr. Williams reviewed expenditures:
Expenditures
2016Bud
2016 YE
2017 Budget
Discussion
Modified et
Estimate
Engineering,
$8,692,740
$5,947,626
$6,738,620
No ECO project
Facilities, Fleet,
in 2016 - $400k in
Engineering
total capital
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if there was a long term plan to convert more City buildings to
solar energy. Mr. Williams said when the Edmonds Solar Cooperative sponsored the panels on the
Frances Anderson Center, there was thought that that could be expanded in the future. The tax credits
expired and although the Solar Cooperative still exists the primary driving force passed away recently.
The City has not been approached to sponsor another project and PUD has not offered any assistance. The
existing panels work great as was anticipated but there is no effort to expand that program.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled the existing solar panels pay for themselves via energy
efficiencies. Mr. Williams answered it depends, the payback for solar power payback is very long. Solar
power is wonderful from an environment perspective, but tax credits are key to a project penciling out.
Many of the tax credits for investments in solar are no longer available, not enough to get the Edmonds
Solar Cooperative to sponsor another project. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was hopefully there would
be another project in the future.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 16
Packet Pg. 18
4.1.a
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern with Mr. Williams reviewing 27 pages of financials and 42
decision packages and suggested in the future the presentation be divided into funds with questions after
each, noting she has now numerous questions.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern that some of the decision packages do not tie to the
numbers, for example, DP32, $6,000 in additional professional services, but the budget item is $5,000.
She asked why that increase in professional services was proposed. Mr. Williams responded that decision
package was for Facilities, Fund 001; in the past Facilities had not much professional services funding
although staff has had to seek professional advice on some repairs over the past year such as electrical.
The new Facilities Manager Tom Sullivan believes it would be advantageous to have a small amount of
money to hire expertise when needed.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Herrera consulting contract that is now up to $220,000,
commenting the budget includes a decision package for $50,000 and asked if that was an addition to the
Herrera contract. City Engineer Rob English responded the $50,000, DP63, is in the 2017 budget to pay
the balance of the work Herrera will do.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked how the $150,000 amount for the Waterfront At -Grade Crossing Design
Development (DP39) was how determined. Mayor Earling responded it was presupposed that number
would carry more influence as the City begins to talk with principals involved in first round of
discussions such as Sound Transit, Community Transit, BNSF, and the Port. The City need to have a
good, solid amount to show its interest. In discussions with Representative Judy Clibborn, House Chair,
she has been clear the City needs a good, strong pronouncement for any future project. Mr. Williams said
$100,000 of the first $690,000 was expended on the alternatives analysis. He was hopeful the remaining
funds plus $150,000 would attract contributions from those partners.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to DP46, $8,000 for tree maintenance. She relayed the Tree Board's
question regarding how Public Works replaces trees and how the $8,000 for tree maintenance was
determined. Mr. Williams responded Public Works often gets involved with removing dead trees; the
workload related to trees funded from Fund 111 has increased tremendously. For example, the recent
change in the code necessitates hiring an arborist to justify tree removal. The department spends more
than $8,000 on trees but this would help fund those efforts.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to DP41, $350,000 for the Frances Anderson Center gym roof, and
asked if that was the location of the solar panels. Mr. Williams assured it was not. Councilmember
Buckshnis relayed her understanding this project would not be funded unless a grant is secured. Mr.
Williams answered the Council is approving the budgetary expense but that is caveated by the statement
that staff will find the money. If the money is not identified, the roof will not be replaced. A much smaller
roof repair may be done to extend the roof's life a few years but a complete reroof will not be done until a
source of funds is identified. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has an issue with how that was
presented. She offered to email other questions to staff.
In response to Councilmember Buckshnis' question about the $350,000 for the Frances Anderson Center
roof, Mayor Earling recalled there were very small grants allocated by the legislature last year, often no
more than $50,000. There will be larger grants this year; in speaking with Representatives Lillian Ortiz -
Self and Strom Peterson, that project will be at the top of their list for inclusion in the State's capital
budget. Although it does appear in the budget, he was guardedly optimistic it would be funded through
the legislature.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 17
Packet Pg. 19
4.1.a
Councilmember Teitzel, the Council liaison for the Historic Preservation Commission, said the Museum
has a list of 30 building repairs, some quite urgent such as rotting window frames. He asked how much of
the $300,000 in the 2017 budget was allocated for that building. Mr. Williams said Tom Sullivan is
working with museum management particularly in regard to two windows on the east side that need to be
replaced; the goal will be to accomplish that in 2017. Councilmember Teitzel commented due to the
historical significance of the building, it is important to replace wood with wood which may increase the
cost. He asked if there was grant funding available for such repairs. Mr. Williams answered the City did
receive some funding from Historic Preservation when the building exterior was redone. He was
uncertain funds would be available for these type of repairs but staff will research.
Council President Johnson suggested Councilmembers copy Finance Director Scott James and
Legislative/Council Assistant Andrew Pierce when sending questions to staff so that a list of
questions/answers could be maintained.
Councilmember Nelson inquired about a photograph in staff s PowerPoint. Mr. Williams said it was a
photograph of the inside of a sewer line showing root intrusion.
Councilmember Nelson referred to DP52, $20,000 for traffic calming, observing that was the same
funding level as 2016 and asked how many projects that funded. Mr. Williams answered it depends on the
project. For example, in 2015 approximately $19,000 was spent on improvements to Olympic View
Drive. The funding does not go far with projects like concrete bulb -outs but would go further with
signage. Councilmember Nelson commented the funding seemed low.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked for clarification regarding where Councilmembers should direct their
questions. Council President Johnson suggested Councilmember direct their questions to staff and copy
Mr. James and Mr. Pierce. Mr. Williams said he will copy the Council on any answers he provides. Mr.
James recalled when staff received questions from Council last year, the reply was sent to all
Councilmembers and the Directors. He recommended following that procedure again to eliminate
duplicate questions.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed interest in Councilmembers having time to ask questions and
hear answers during a Council meeting as that provided a clearer picture and ability to ask follow-up
questions. She pointed out once the Mayor presents the budget, it is the Council's budget and it is not a
bad thing to have face-to-face discussions and Q&A. She expressed interest in having more time at
Council meetings to review issues.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling reported:
• Four Councilmembers signed up for the AWC dinner at Scotts. He envisioned it would be a
valuable session, Governor Inslee will attend.
• Following a meeting with PUD, PUD has agreed to reduce the lights to 3000K, the level most of
the concerned citizens found acceptable.
• The final public meeting regarding the Civic Field is tomorrow from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. in the
Library Plaza Room.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Nelson made the following statement: Looking back on the year since our Council
created the Edmonds Diversity Commission, boy has our national climate changed. Every day throughout
our country, folks have come out, whether they are elected officials, candidates, individuals, or
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 18
Packet Pg. 20
organizations, saying hateful and hurtful things because someone looks different than they do, practices a
different religious or is of the opposite sex. Now more than ever we need to hear the drumbeat of voices
celebrating our differences like our very own Diversity Commission that we heard from tonight. Can we
afford to stay silent, averting our eyes, living with this uncomfortable unease, ashamed of what we are
hearing and seeing nationally, hoping this will all just go away? It's not going away. Like Walt Whitman,
it is time that we each step out publicly and make a barbaric yelp over the roofs of the world, sharing the
goodness that exists in all of us. A message like our wonderful city that accepts, respects, celebrates all
people, all races, all sexual orientations and all religions makes communities stronger and better.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked Councilmember Nelson for his comments. In response to Mr.
Hertrich's comments regarding the Multimodal Fund, she reported on her discussion with Mr. James and
with Stephen Clifton, the former Economic Development Director, who were able to shed light on this
topic. Mr. Clifton provided a historical perspective regarding the Multimodal Fund and agreed with Mr.
James that the $53,000 in the Multimodal Fund was money that Edmonds contributed; the grants were
restricted to the multimodal project and had dried up because they were not used in the time allowed. Mr.
Clifton agreed it was appropriate to move the funds into the General Fund.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked the citizens who have contacted Councilmembers regarding the
Edmonds Marsh. Tonight's action was the final chapter; she thanked Mayor Earling, Shane Hope, Kernen
Lien and everyone who has assist with the SMP.
Council President Johnson reported:
• Final public meeting regarding the Civic Field is tomorrow om 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. in the Library
Plaza Room.
• League of Women Voter of Snohomish County is sponsoring a movie, "Our children Are Not for
Sale" on Thursday, Nov 17 from 6:30 — 9 p.m. at the Edmonds Unitarian Universalist Church.
• Ed! is offering an amnesty program for people to return their green umbrellas.
• Tickets are still available for the All Aboard Museum Heritage Days Benefit.
• The Council has received many comments about the new sign code. A discussion will be
scheduled in early November. The Council supports a prosperous downtown, supports businesses
and encourages everyone to shop in Edmonds including the businesses on the side streets.
Councilmember Tibbott reported:
• He met with several business owners this week who are affected by the sign code which gave him
a greater appreciation for the difficulties they face with regard to obtaining signage in time for the
enforcement period. He was pleased the Council is talking about it and expressed his appreciation
to Councilmember Nelson for drafting a resolution that will help extend the conversation
regarding the sign code and downtown businesses.
• He thanked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas for the update on the Multimodal Fund.
• He attended the Diversity Commission's Immigrant and Refugee forum and found it very
interested. He encouraged the City to publicize those events beyond the circle of people who
normally attend City events and possibly partner with other groups. He had some ideas for
publicizing events.
• Meadowdale High School vs. Edmonds-Woodway High School football game on Friday at 5 p.m.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported only about 30 people attend the Diversity Commission's
Immigration & Refugee Forum although a bigger turnout had been expected. An event planned for
November has been cancelled and will be rescheduled to allow the Commission time to assess better ways
of getting the word out to different groups. Although there were signs and My Edmonds News published
an article, it was not well publicized on the Hwy 99 corridor where the diversity exists.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 19
Packet Pg. 21
4.1.a
11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
This item was not needed.
12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
This item was not needed.
13. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:43 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 18, 2016
Page 20
Packet Pg. 22
4.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #222379 through #222506 dated October 20, 2016 for $1,235,244.23.
Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #62356 through #62367 for $507,662.87, benefit checks
#62368 through #62373 and wire payments of $557,959.61 for the pay period October 1, 2016 through
October 15, 2016.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
Fiscal Impact
Claims $1,235,244.23
Payroll Employee checks and direct deposit $507,662.87
Payroll Benefit checks and wire payments $557,959.61
Total Payroll $1,065,622.48
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claim cks 10-20-16
claim cks 10-20-16a
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-20-16
payroll summary 10-20-16
payroll benefits 10-20-16
Packet Pg. 23
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
222379
10/20/2016 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
15-41810
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
15-43412
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
15-43489
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
15-43511
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Tota
222380
10/20/2016 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
374710
PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CO
PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CO
222381 10/20/2016 072189 ACCESS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 1631452
222382 10/20/2016 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
222383 10/20/2016 065568 ALLWATER INC
090216045A
091616034
COURT SHRED
COURT SHRED
001.000.23.523.30.49.00
Tota
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
Tota
FINANCE DEPT WATER
Water - Balance owing on invoice -
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
FINANCE DEPT WATER
Water
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 1
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun N
0
a
0)137.0, La)161.6( c
m
c
173.2(
N
CF
0
L
157.0( a
1 : 628.8,
Nl U
1 0
137.2E
1 : 137.2E c
L
Q
Q
Q
LO
77.0( N
co
I : 77.05
�
CF N
141,270.7( o
I: 141,270.7( w
v
E
W
2.0( 6
c
m
43.6( t
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 24
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222383 10/20/2016 065568 ALLWATER INC
222384 10/20/2016 070976 AMERESCO INC
222385 10/20/2016 065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH
222386 10/20/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
100316097
FINANCE DEPT WATER
Water
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
100316098
WWTP: OCT 2016 DRINKING WA
October 2016 Water services (plus
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Tota
2
WWTP: PROJECT C431 PH 5 EN
Construction Services
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
Retainage
423.100.223.400
3
WWTP: PROJECT C431 PH 5 EN
Professional Services
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
9.8% Sales Tax
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
Tota
7008910350
WWTP: MOTOR-WEG ELECTRIC l
Motor
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Tota
1988836732
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVIC
4.2.a
Page: 2
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
30.5E 4)
L
TE
4-
35.0. c
c�
358,419.0z L,
ca
a
-16,321.4E
U
96,666.0E 0
9,473.2 0
I: 448,236.91 a
Q.
Q
E
LO
N
943.5,
m
122.8z
N
r
0
104.5( c
1 : 1,170.8E w
E
54.5,
r
c
m
E
24.9(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 25
E
LO
N
943.5,
m
122.8z
N
r
0
104.5( c
1 : 1,170.8E w
E
54.5,
r
c
m
E
24.9(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 25
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
222386 10/20/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued)
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
1988840723
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MA
4.2.a
Page: 3
T:
T:
T:
�
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
2.4z
�
1.6' E.
�
6.1'
�
6.1' c�a
�
T:
T� o
6.1' `>,
a
6.1'
6.0£ U
0
AT
0.6( Ln
N
co
0.6(
m
r
0.6( o
N
0
0.5£ w
�c
5.6£
18.4(
m
0.5( t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 26
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222386 10/20/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
222387 10/20/2016 071377 ARGUELLES, ERIN
222388 10/20/2016 072576 ART ACCESS
222389 10/20/2016 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM
222390 10/20/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
9.8% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
Tota
10/16 WOTS REIMB
10/16 WOTS REIMBURSEMENT
10/16 WOTS REIMB
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
Tota
14201
ARTACCESS LISTING
ARTACCESS LISTING
123.000.64.573.20.41.40
Tota
0978560-IN
WWTP: 9/30/16 DIESEL FUEL
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.32.00
ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (includ
423.000.76.535.80.32.00
Tota
90625
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILL
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
9.6% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
9.6% Sales Tax
4.2.a
Page: 4
c
ca
hd
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
1.8(
143.6: L
=a
4.
W
c
426.7,
426.7:
c
c�
0
88.0( ca
1 : 88.0(
E
U
w
305.1' c
e >
3,113.3. a
I : 3,418.4: 0
S LO
N
co
91.2E
m
r
91.2E o
N
0
94.0( w
328.3( U
w
328.2� 6
c
8.7(
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 27
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222390 10/20/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
222391 10/20/2016 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 45815
222392 10/20/2016 070641 BHARTI KIRCHNER
222393 10/20/2016 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC
WOTS KIRCHNER PANEL
WOTS KIRCHNER PRESET
540617
222394 10/20/2016 075817 BLACK LION CONSTRUCTION SRVCS BLD20161158
222395 10/20/2016 073062 BLUE FLAME
222396 10/20/2016 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
BLD20160521
12400
PO # Description/Account
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
9.6% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
ROUGH BOX-KEMP
ROUGH BOX-KEMP
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
4.2.a
Page: 5
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
U)
0
a
8.7(
9.01 a0i
L
Total : 959.6: 'a
Tota
WOTS KIRCHNER PANELIST
WOTS KIRCHNER PANELIST
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
WOTS KIRCHNER PRESENTATIO
WOTS KIRCHNER PRESENTATIO
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
Tota
E3DD.FULL SIZE PLAN COPIES
E3DD.Full Size Plan Copies
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
Tota
REFUND- PERMIT, BLD20161158,
REFUND- PERMIT, BLD20161158,
001.000.257.620
Tota
REFUND- PERMIT, BLD2016-0521
REFUND- PERMIT, BLD2016-0521
001.000.257.620
Tota
E5GA/E5JA/E4GB.SERVICES THR
ESGA.Services thru September 201
423.200.75.594.35.41.00
4-
a�
c
m
460.0(
460.0(
0
65.0(
N �
N U
145.0( o
210.0( _
cu
a
Q.
108.7' Q
108.7' N
w
G
G
r
20.0( c
1 : 20.0( c
n Y
� 0
60.0( .
1 : 60.0(
U c
m
6 E
16,728.8(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 28
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222396 10/20/2016 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
222397 10/20/2016 067391 BRAT WEAR
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
E4GB.Services thru September 2016
423.200.75.594.35.41.00
ESJA.Services thru September 2016
421.200.74.594.34.41.00
12404
E6FB.SERVICES THRU SEPTEMBE
E6FB.Services thru September 2016
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
Total:
19994
INV#19994 - EDMONDS PD - YAMAI`
S/S TRADITIONAL SHIRTS - STRUIV
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
S/S TRADITIONAL SHIRT - YAMANE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
L/S TRADITIONAL SHIRTS -STRUM
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
L/S CLASS A SHIRT - STRUM
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
L/S TRADITIONAL SHIRT - YAMANE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
L/S CLASS A SHIRT - YAMANE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
S/S CONTEMPORY SHIRT-YAMANE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
EMBROIDER NAME 5 SHIRTS-STRI
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
EMBROIDER NAME 3 SHIRTS -YAM/
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
UNIFORM PANTS - YAMANE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
UNIFORM PANTS - STRUM
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
UNIFORM PAN TS - ROTH
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
4.2.a
Page: 6
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
m
4,728.2(
a�
L
1,996.71 =a
a�
c
1,545.7E
24,999.5:
c�
0
177.0( Q
59.0(
128.0( o
64.0( o
L
a
0.
64.0( Q
64.0( C'4
82.0( m
r
40.0( N
0
24.0( Y
178.0( .
c�
89.0( r
c
m
89.0( E
R
.r
r
a
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 29
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
222397 10/20/2016 067391 BRAT WEAR (Continued)
222398 10/20/2016 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 5174 YOGA
5183 YOGA
5186 YOGA
5189 PILATES
222399 10/20/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 16606143
16606144
16609415
222400 10/20/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC 9434191937
PO # Description/Account
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.71.24.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Tota
5174 YOGA INSTRUCTION
5174 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
5183 YOGA INSTRUCTION
5183 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
5186 YOGA INSTRUCTION
5186 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
5189 PILATES INSTRUCTION
5189 PILATES INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Tota
WWTP: 10/1-10/31/16 MO CHG - C
10/1-10/31/16 MO Chg for CONT
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
CANON CONTRACT CHARGES C
contract charges for C2501F
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
ENG. COPIER OCTOBER 2016
Eng. Copier October 2016
001.000.67.518.21.45.00
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 7
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
57.5,
a�
L
46.1E =a
1,161.61
a�
c
m
405.9( r-
0
594.0� a
E
339.3( U
w
0
342.0( 0
1 : 1,681M a
C a
RA( 'O
N
82.4E
25
m
r
26.4z N
0
2.6( w
E
307.1:
1 : 418.6,
r
c
m
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 30
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222400 10/20/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9434191938
STORM - DUMP FEES
Storm - Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
9434191939
STORM DUMP FEES
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
9434214395
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9434228760
STORM DUMP FEES
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
9434228761
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9434228763
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9434228764
STORM DUMP FEES
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
9434257506
ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 8
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
212.1( -0)
20.1E 4)
L
4-
632.1 £ c
m
627.3(
0
178.5( a
E
16.9(
U
4-
0
496.8z to
0
L
a
0.
280.0( Q
LO
26.6( "
m
55.0( c
N
5.Z
N
Y
195.1( .
c�
r
269.9(
E
t
25.6E
.r
r
Q
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 31
4.2.a
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222400 10/20/2016 068484 068484 CEMEX LLC
222401 10/20/2016 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
222402 10/20/2016 074423 CHAN, YVONNE
222403 10/20/2016 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS
222404 10/20/2016 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Page: 9
c
ca
lid
U
w
U
_ Amoun };
(Continued)
Total:
3,041.6:a
m
RN09161028
WWTP: 9/30/16 CYLINDER RENTAL
9/30/16 nitrogen, oxygen, carbon
m
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
64.0(
9.8% Sales Tax
=
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
6.2 ,
Total:
70.2,
10182016
TRAVEL TO NEOGOV CONFERENC
c
ROUNDTRIP FLIGHT TO LAS VEGA
f°
001.000.22.518.10.49.00
161.2( o
Total:
161.2( M
a
E6FE.STF20160020
E6FE.STF20160020 SEPA
E6FE.STF20160020 SEPA
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
610.0( ,-
Total:
610.0( c
c�
12506
WWTP: SEPTEMBER 2016 M/O & &
o
September 2016 2016 M/O & SEWEF a
423.000.75.535.80.47.20 27,602.0( Q
12519 WWTP: OCTOBER 2016 M/O & SEV1 LO
October 2016 M/O & SEWER N
co
423.000.75.535.80.47.20 27,602.0(
222405 10/20/2016 073573 CLARK SECURITY PRODUCTS INC 23K-129345
23K-130787
Tota
FAC MAINT - KEY SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Key Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Freight
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
CITY HALL - DOOR SUPPLIES
City Hall - Door Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
1 : 55,204.0(
0
N
O
49.5( Y
11.0, .E
c�
5.9:
c
m
E
t
249.5.
.r
r
Q
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 32
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
222405
10/20/2016 073573 CLARK SECURITY PRODUCTS INC
(Continued)
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Tota
222406
10/20/2016 004095 COASTWIDE LABS
GW2901039
FAC MAINT - LINERS, SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Liners, Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
GW2906791
FAC MAINT - VAC PARTS AND LA
Fac Maint - Vac Parts and Labor
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
GW2906792
FAC MAINT - VERSAMATIC PART
Fac Maint - Versamatic Parts & La
4.2.a
Page: 10
b
Packet Pg. 33
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
222406 10/20/2016 004095 COASTWIDE LABS (Continued)
N W 2906792
N W 2906794
N W 2916087
N W 2916493
IINTPOW Ej 031I
222407 10/20/2016 061529 COMPTON, DOUGLAS BB13448
PO # Description/Account
Fac Maint - Parts and Repairs
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
FAC MAINT - VERSAMATIC PART
Fac Maint - Versamatic Parts and L
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
FAC MAINT - VERSAMATIC PARTS
Fac Maint - Versamatic Parts and R
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
CLEANER FOR CLASSROOMS
CLEANER FOR CLASSROOMS
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
PM: TT, DISNF CLEANER
PM: TT, DISNF CLEANER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM: TT
PM: TT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Tota
SICK LEAVE BUYBACK REFUND
REFUND HOLDAY (9/5/16) FOR SI
001.000.41.521.22.11.00
4.2.a
Page: 11
c
ca
lid
U
W
_ Amoun };
0
a
am
45.3z
4.4z =a
S�
ak d
c
62.8(
6.1: c�a
i
480.5: C*4
47.0£ m
r
0
N
61.6(
N
6.01
2,601.6' •�
r
CI
139.7z E
t
R
.r
r
a
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 34
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
222407 10/20/2016 061529 061529 COMPTON, DOUGLAS (Continued)
222408 10/20/2016 072848 COPIERS NW 1453905
1453906
222409 10/20/2016 075826 DAHN DESIGN LLC 1
222410 10/20/2016 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3318014
222411 10/20/2016 064531 DINES, J EAN N I E 16-3705
222412 10/20/2016 075468 DRAMA KIDS 5027 DRAMA KIDS
222413 10/20/2016 007253 DUNN LUMBER 4261538
PO # Description/Account
Tota
INV#1453905 ACCT#HMH636 - ED
LEASE #IRC5045 9/5 TO 10/4/16
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
INV#1453906 ACCT#HMH636 - ED
3,168 B/W COPIES 9/5 TO 10/4/16
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
1,414 COLOR COPIES 9/5 TO 10/4
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
Tota
E4MB.INTERPRETIVE SIGNS
E4MB.Interpretive Signs
016.000.66.518.30.41.00
Tota
BUSINESS RECRUITMENT AD IN
Business recruitment ads in DJC fo
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
4.2.a
Page: 12
c
ca
lid
U
W
_ Amoun };
I : 139.7� 0
CL
M
m
226.7 ia
22.2, c
M
25.3z r-
66.4(
ca
a
9.0(
I : 349.75
w
0
r
r
Q
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 35
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222413 10/20/2016 007253 DUNN LUMBER
222414 10/20/2016 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10066307 PM: COMB WR POL
PM: COMB WR POL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10066421 PM: MTRC SEAL
PM: MTRC SEAL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
222415 10/20/2016 071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ECA-10112016
222416 10/20/2016 073461 EDMONDS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 10/14 REFUND
222417 10/20/2016 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC E1762963
E1763009
Tota
Tota
TOURISM PROMOTION FOR ECA
Tourism promotion award to ECA fo
120.000.31.575.42.41.40
Tota
10/14/16 REFUND DAMAGE DEP
10/14/16 REFUND DAMAGE DEP
001.000.239.200
Tota
PRE -EMPLOYMENT TESTING (PD
PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL E
001.000.22.521.10.41.00
PRE -EMPLOYMENT TESTING (PD
PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL E
001.000.22.521.10.41.00
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 13
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
am
57.7:
a�
L
5.4£ =a
I: 63Z
W
c
m
65.4: cm
0
6.4'
0
a
38.2(
3.7, o
I : 113.8( 0
0
B a
r Q•
Q
12,500.0(
1 : 12,500.0( N
W
OS
OS
200.0( N
1 : 200.0( c
Y
XA
133.0(
XA
195.0( m
1 : 328.0(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 36
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222418 10/20/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
1-00575
OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / ME-
OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / ME-
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-00655
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
1-00825
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-00875
SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST / METER 11
SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST / METER 11
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-00925
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AV
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AV
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
1-01950
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE,
LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE,
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
1-02125
SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ M
SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-03710
SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST / METER
SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-03900
SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / MET[
SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / MET[
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-03950
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (NORTH) 200
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
1-05125
SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METE
SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-05285
SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / MI
SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / MI
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
4.2.a
Page: 14
c
ca
hd
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
m
963.9�
a�
L
41.1
d
c
m
1,411.8(
c�
0
41.1 0
0
a
E
41.1
4-
0
41.1 0
0
L
a
Q.
115.7( Q
LO
N
co
41.1
m
r
0
179.5E N
0
N
Y
589.3 1
E
105.0E
c
m
E
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 37
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222418 10/20/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
1-05340
SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / MET[
SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / MET[
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-05350
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200
OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
1-05650
CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71,
CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71,
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-05675
CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP /
CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP /
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-05700
SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER
SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-05705
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
1-09650
SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST / METER i
SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST / METER i
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-09800
SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / MET[
SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / MET[
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-10778
FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75'
FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75'
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-10780
SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER
SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1-13975
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
1-16130
SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METEI
SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METEI
4.2.a
Page: 15
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
a)
73.1' aa)
L
=a
4-
224.2: c
m
41.1 0 M
0
874.7� Q
E
413.8,
4-
0
ns
87.3: o
L
a
Q.
Q
147.6z
LO
co
76.6E
r
0
N
140.51 c
N
Y
158.2� ,
ca
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 38
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
222418 10/20/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued)
1-16300
1-16420
1-16450
1-16630
1-17475
1-19950
1-36255
222419 10/20/2016 075566 EHRBAR, PAMELA BID-101816
222420 10/20/2016 068803 EJ USA INC 110160080600
PO # Description/Account
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / ME
SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / ME
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER
LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER
CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST / METE
SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST / METE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / ME
SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / ME
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METE
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / ME
SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / ME
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
Tota
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 10/4
Administrative services for BID
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
STORM - GRATES
Storm - Grates
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 16
R
R
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
126.3z -0a
TI },
TI
L
282.5' 15
6' 4-
6' d
c
51.8'
1
1
c�
264.7( o
a
630.3, E
TI
TI
232.8: o
TE
TE
-1
R �
R 0
0
L
78.9< a
Q
LO
41.1 04
w
I : 8,227.05
m
r
O
N
442.5( c
1 : 442.5( w
E
1,917.0(
r
c
187.8
t
R
.r
r
a
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 39
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222420 10/20/2016 068803 068803 EJ USA INC
222421 10/20/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
AR50843
AR50844
PO #
Description/Account
WATER SEWER COPY USE
Water Sewer Copy Use
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Water Sewer Copy Use
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
PW COPY USE
PW Copy Use
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
PW Copy Use
111.000.68.542.90.31.00
PW Copy Use
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
PW Copy Use
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
PW Copy Use
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
PW Copy Use
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 17
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
2,104.8, 0
CL
am
U
m
8.8£
4
8.8 , c
m
0.8 i
c
c�
0.8m0
a
33.2:
18.8: U
4-
0
18.8<
0
L
13.2£ a
13.2( �n
N
W
13.2£
m
3.2( c
N
1.8E c
N
Y
1.8E
E
1.3(
r
1.3(
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 40
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
222421 10/20/2016 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued)
AR51782
222422 10/20/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH724181
EDH724989
EDH725864
222423 10/20/2016 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU41452
WAMOU41547
222424 10/20/2016 062290 FEDEX KINKOS OFFICE AND PRINT 10/01/16
PO # Description/Account
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT
2600-
Maintenance for printers 09/21/16 -
001.000.31.518.88.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.31.518.88.48.00
Tota
PB PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FO
PB Public Hearing Notice for CIP/C
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
CITY ORDINANCE 4043
ORDINANCE SUMM 4043
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
CITY ORDINANCE 4044
CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4044
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
Tota
PM: SUPPLIES
PM: SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM: SUPPLIES
PM: SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 18
0
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
1.2( -a
02 },
a�
L
307.2(
4
30.1' c
I : 478.4'
R
c�
FF —
53.3,
0
a
34.4( •�
U
4-
0
24.0E @
I : 111.8( p
L
Q
Q.
Q
-25.2E N
w
-2.4E �.
m
r
O
N
28.9E o
N
2.81
Total: 4.0E E
M
INVOICE DATED 10/1/16, ACCT#95C U
PROJECT BOOKS (SWAT)
628.000.41.521.23.31.00 1,552.0
9.8% Sales Tax t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 41
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
222424 10/20/2016 062290 FEDEX KINKOS OFFICE AND PRINT
(Continued)
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
Tota
222425 10/20/2016 011900 FRONTIER
425-712-0417
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
425-712-0423
WWTP: 10/7-11/6/16 AFTER HOU
222426 10/20/2016 075163 GARCIA-GARCIA, CESAR 15259
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 19
R
71.1E
X, ca
a
N'
16.3E •�
N' U
81.9( 0
N'
68.8( 0
N' a
68.8( Q
N'
91.7: 04
m
83.1, r
0
N
O
64.4E Y
613.0(
E
105.3. c
1 : 105.3, E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 42
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
222427
10/20/2016 075825 GARRISON, DENINE
DGARRISON
REIMBURSEMENT FOR WORK CC
BUFFER SOLNS/ROSOLIC ACID/
4.2.a
Page: 20
�
E
S
s
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0-
-0a
99.9'
I : 99.9'
=a
U =
4-
c
1,778.0(
13.2, cm
0
175.5z
ca _ a
300.0(
29.4( o
2,296.1E 0
0
a
Q.
Q
5,101.1E
N
co
5,226.3E
10,327.51 r
0
N
0
N
423.5'
E
41.5( 'm
465.0' U
C
r
c
, m
P( E
t
R
.r
r
a
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 43
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
222431 10/20/2016 012560 HACH COMPANY (Continued)
222432 10/20/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1011611
1582228
2025176
2025231
3034254
4021777
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Tota
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
OLD PW - ARTWORKS SUPPLIES
Old PW - Artworks Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC - SUPPLIES
FAC - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 21
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
687.9E
41.61 a0i
L
=a
71.5'
801.1< c
m
c
c�
91.0' o
8.6E a
E
3.3E U
4-
0
0.3,
0
a
27.8 Q
2.6E �
m
23.6E r
0
N
2.2E
N
Y
122.9, E
11.6E
c
m
E
9.4
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 44
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
222432 10/20/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued)
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4021817
LIBRARY - SUPPLIES
Library - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4024950
STREET - CRACK SEAL FOR 2320
Street - Crack Seal for 23201 75th
4.2.a
Page: 22
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
0.9(
5D
8.3E
d
c
0.7�
PI
1 �
�
14.9E o
L
1.4, a
E
10.8,
4-
0
1.01
0
L
Q
0.
50.3( Q
LO
4.7E C*4
m
r
20.9E c
N
1.9� o
N
11.9 1 .E
c�
1.1z
m
E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 45
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222432 10/20/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
6034151
FAC - SUPPLIES
FAC - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7021379
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
8022771
STORM- SUPPLIES FOR DITCH O
Storm- Supplies for Ditch on 80th &
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
8095858
CITY HALL - MEDIA BOX
City Hall - Media Box
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Truck 5 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9022680
FAC - SUPPLIES
FAC - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9572675
PS - REPLACEMENT BATTERIES
4.2.a
Page: 23
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
25.6( -0)
2.4:
L
4.
10.2E c
m
0.9E
c�
0: j 77.8,
ca
a
1�
7.4(
N
U
9.9E o
0.9E o
a
Q.
Q
14.91
N
co
25.9E
m
r
2.91 c
N
4.1
N
U
104.6< .E
c�
9.9z
m
E
t
U
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 46
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222432 10/20/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
222433 10/20/2016 075824 HOOKS, KARENA
222434 10/20/2016 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC
222435 10/20/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 24
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
69.7,
6.6, a0i
L
Total : 807.81 'a
001 DIVERSITY COMMISSION PROFES;
a
Diversity Commission professional
001.000.61.557.20.41.00
300.0(
Total:
300.0(
27007 WWTP: 100-1300 GEOTECHNICAL;
0
GEOTECHNICAL 100-1300
ca
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
3,710.9,
Tota
2848718
CHAIR
CHAIR
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
2862872
WWTP: PENS/DESK PADS/C-FOL
Supplies:
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2863552
WWTP: LEGAL SZ CLIPBOARDS+
LEGAL SIZE: CLIPBOARDS+SHEE
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2863556
WWTP: FACIAL TISSUE
Facial Tissue Boxes
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
3,710.9, .9
U
4-
0
385.0( >
0
L
Q
37.7: o
D
LO
N
193.7'
18.9E
S N
T c
15.2( w
1.4E E
9.6E
m
E
0.9:
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 47
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222435 10/20/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
222436 10/20/2016 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.2.a
Page: 25
c
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Un
lid
a�
Amoun };
(Continued)
a
2863557
JULIAN DAILY APPOINTMENT BOOT
Burkhardt's Day Counter Daily Calen(
-a)
+,
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
95.5 0 aci
L
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
9.3 1
2864099
BINDERS FOR 2017 BUDGET
c
1.5" Business Source Standard
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
104.7E
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
10.2 o
2865516
STENO NOTEBOOKS
Tops Gregg Prism Steno Notebooks -
a
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
36.4(
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
3.5E u
2866614
CITY CLERKS OFFICE SUPPLIES
o
FASTENER FOLDERS, AVERY EAS`
001.000.25.514.30.31.00
118.9( o
9.8% Sales Tax
a
001.000.25.514.30.31.00
11.6( Q
2866734
WWTP: BINDER COVERS, WHITE C
,n
BINDER COVERS, WHITE GEL PEN
N
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
20.5(
9.8% Sales Tax
m
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
r
2.0' c
Total:
1,075.75 c
300-10013480
SEWER - WORK JACKET
(n
Sewer - Work Jacket
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
39.9E E
9.8% Sales Tax
f°
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
3.9.
300-10014350
WATER - 2 WORK PARKAS
m
Water - 2 Work Parkas
E
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
79.9(
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 48
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222436 10/20/2016 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
222437 10/20/2016 072422 JE HORTON INTERPRETING SVCS 13802
222438 10/20/2016 067568 KPG INC
222439 10/20/2016 069343 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES INC
222440 10/20/2016 066522 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC
910016
1607898-1283
E4CD.Pmt 5
222441 10/20/2016 074662 LATITUDE GEOGRAPHICS GROUP INV0004423
PO # Description/Account
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
Tota
INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
4.2.a
Page: 26
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun
};
_
0
0-
a)
7.8<
1 : 131.6(
L
=a
4-
W
c
106.0E
Total :
106.0E
c
ESDA.SERVICES THRU 9/25/16
ESDA.Services thru 9/25/16
0 L
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
13,618.3E M
Total:
13,618.3E
E
TO 16-04.SECONDARY CLARIFIER
TO 16-04.Secondary Clarifier #3 thru
,-
423.100.76.594.39.41.10
937.0( o
Total:
937.0( >
0
L
E4CD.PMT 5 THRU 9/30/16
0.
Q.
E4CD.Pmt 5 thru 9/30/16
Q
112.000.68.595.33.65.00
43,109.4< <n
Total :
43,109.41 co
GEOCORTEX ESSENTIALS ANNUAI
to
Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint
c
001.000.62.558.60.48.00
1,850.0( N
Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint
422.000.72.531.90.48.00
462.5( Y
Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint
111.000.68.542.90.48.00
462.5( .
Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint
f°
421.000.74.534.80.48.00
462.5( r
Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint
423.000.75.535.80.48.00 462.5( E
R
.r
r
a
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 49
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222441 10/20/2016 074662 LATITUDE GEOGRAPHICS GROUP
222442 10/20/2016 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC
222443 10/20/2016 067631 LODESTAR COMPANY INC
222444 10/20/2016 072320 MACK, LINDA
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
4.2.a
Page: 27
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
am
181.3(
a�
L
45.3: =a
45.3: c
m
45.3:
c�
45.3' 0
Total: 4,062.6(
a
20263 expenses 08-16 REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPE
08-16 reimbursement for expenses - to
001.000.36.515.31.41.00 93.4E Z
Oct-16 10-16 LEGALS FEES o
10-16 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.31.41.00 42 640.0( o
144086
AQ33567
AQ33567
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.62.558.60.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.48.00
Tota
WWTP: MAINTENANCE #1254 WA
MAINTENANCE #1254 WATER/SO
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Tota
SICK LEAVE BUYBACK REFUND
REFUND HOLIDAY (9/5) & OT FOR
001.000.41.521.71.11.00
SICK LEAVE BUYBACK REFUND
REFUND OT FOR SICK LEAVE BU
001.000.41.521.71.11.00
Tota
T
� L
I: 42,733.4E 0-
Q
`n
U
N
co
559.0(
m
54.7£ r
1 : 613.71 N
0
N
S
249.8: E
Y
20.2 0
I : 270.1(
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 50
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222445 10/20/2016 075480 MADATH, DONNA
222446 10/20/2016 069862 MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND
222447 10/20/2016 061900 MARC
222448 10/20/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
222449 10/20/2016 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
5015 LITTLE FISHES
1438-24
1438-25
0591320-IN
83315871
5226 FELDENKRAIS
222450 10/20/2016 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 16782
16783
4.2.a
Page: 28
c
ca
lid
U
a�
PO # Description/Account Amoun };
5015 LITTLE FISHES INSTRUCTION
U)
0
5015 LITTLE FISHES INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
445.5(
Total:
445.5( i
=a
ECDC REWRITE
ECDC REWRITE
4.
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
1,200.0(
ECDC REWRITE ADDENDUM #1
ECDC REWRITE ADDENDUM #1
c�
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
430.2E _
Total:
1,630.2E
c�
WWTP: ENERGIZER LIFT ST, SUPE
Q'
ENERGIZER LIFT ST, SUPER-ZYME
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
1,861.6( TU
9.8% Sales Tax
4-
0
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
182.4< =
Tota
WWTP: PRESSURE REGULATOR
Pressure Regulator
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Tota
5226 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIO
5226 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIO
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Tota
STREET FILE SCANNING
Street File Scanning
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
CITY CLERKS - DOCUMENTS SC
I : 2,044.0:
0
Q
Q.
Q
211.3( N
w
7.9�
1 : 219.3E
0
N N
0
N
496.0(
1 : 496.0(
r
2,635.4.
AN E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 51
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222450 10/20/2016 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD
222451 10/20/2016 074831 MILLER PAINT COMPANY
222452 10/20/2016 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
4.2.a
Page: 29
c
ca
U
a�
_ Amoun };
0
a
DOCUMENTS SCANNED - BITONAL m
001.000.25.514.30.41.00 206.2,
9.8% Sales Tax
L
001.000.25.514.30.41.00 20.2' 15
Tota
29730829 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES
Traffic - Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
29745481 TRAFFIC - PAINT TRUCK SUPPLI
Traffic - Paint Truck Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
29782538 TRAFFIC - PAINT TRUCK PARTS
Traffic - Paint Truck Parts & Supplie
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
246469 STORM TOOL RENTAL
Storm Tool Rental
422.000.72.531.40.45.00
9.8% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.45.00
246788 STREET - SUPPLIES
Street - Supplies
111.000.68.542.71.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.71.31.00
2,861.8E
E8
&
W
c
m
16.9(
0
1.6(
a
21.9( 5
2.1, o
: 0
s 0
0
L
1,753.9( a
171.8£ "
Total: 1,968.41 N
Tota
co
m
r
75.0( N
0
7.3E w
E
54.8£ 2
U
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 52
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
222453 10/20/2016 075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING
18
WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PR,
Tasks 1: Parks Project Mgmt and
125.000.64.575.50.41.00
Tasks 3: Engineering Grant Writing
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
Task 5: Engineering WWU Sustainab
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
Total
222454 10/20/2016 075770 NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST
12251158
7900044080303286 POSTAGE 09/2C
POSTAGE ADDED TO POSTAGE MA
001.000.25.514.30.42.00
Total
222455 10/20/2016 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC
0550151152
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151153
YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET
YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151154
HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC
HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151155
PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCK[
PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151156
SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET
SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151157
WILLOW CREEK HONEY BUCKET
WILLOW CREEK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151158
CIVIC 6TH & BELL HONEY BUCKET
CIVIC 6TH & BELL HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151159
EDMONDS ELEMENTARY HONEY B
4.2.a
Page: 30
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
937.5(
125.0( =5
4.
437.5( c
1,500.0(
c
c�
0
3,000.0( ">%
3,000.0( a
E
U
587.6: o
0
309.2' a
Q.
Q
218.7E N
m
113.8E r
0
N
0
113.8E w
E
113.8E
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 53
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account
222455 10/20/2016 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC (Continued)
222456 10/20/2016 064215 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIP CO
222457 10/20/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
EDMONDS ELEMENTARY HONEY B
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151160
MADRONA ELEMENTARY HONEY B
MADRONA ELEMENTARY HONEY B
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151161
MARINA BEACH HONEY BUCKET
MARINA BEACH HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151162
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151163
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON
CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151164
BALLINGER PARK HONEY BUCKET
BALLINGER PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
0550151165
DAYTON ST HONEY BUCKET
DAYTON ST HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
Total
2742612-00
WWTP: RADIAL FAN (KAESER)
RADIAL FAN (KAESER)
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
154535 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES
PW Office Supplies
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
4.2.a
Page: 31
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
m
111.6E
a�
L
111.6E
a�
c
m
2,938.8E
c�
0
113.8E
ca
a
111.6E ru
0
a
Q.
150.0( Q
5,222.5'
N
co
m
1,422.0( r
0
N
40.8E
N
Y
143.3(
1,606.2' E
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 54
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222457 10/20/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
222458 10/20/2016 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
222459 10/20/2016 065787 PATRIOT DIAMOND INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
177067
213112
220091
3745-446383
PO # Description/Account
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
PW OFFICE SUPPLIES
PW Office Supplies
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
P&RADMIN: BANDAIDS, CLIPS, LE
P&RADMIN: BANDAIDS, CLIPS, LE
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
PM: INK CARTRIDGE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
P&RADMIN: PAPER, ARTS COMM
P&RADMIN: PAPER
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
ARTS COMM: ENVELOPES
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
PM: BELT
PM: BELT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 32
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
0.9' -0a
U
a�
L
26.0z
4
2.5z
m
13.7(
0
119.6z
c�
a
1.3z E
11.7: u
4-
0
73.4E o
a
0.
14.7E Q
LO
7.2( C*4
1.4E w
r
Total : 282.1 , c
N
O
N
Y
47.7(
E
4.6E
Total : 52.41
c
A06534 ROADWAY - CONCRETE BLADE SU E
E
Roadway - Concrete Blade Supplies
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222459 10/20/2016 065787 PATRIOT DIAMOND INC
222460 10/20/2016 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC
222461 10/20/2016 027450 PAWS
222462 10/20/2016 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
Freight
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 33
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
U)
0
a
328.0(
24.0(
L
Total : 352.0( 'a
111430
INV#111430 - EDMONDS PD
TOW 2016 TOYOTA #AZD9341
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
Tota
Sept 2016
INVOICE 10/10/16 FOR SEPT 201
RTG FEE FOR #A33391028
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
RTG FEE/BOARD FOR VARIOUS
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
RGT FEE FOR #33567978
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
RTG FEE/BOARD FOR #33391028
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
SEPT 2016
SEPTEMBER 2016 ANIMAL SHEL
TE
4-
a�
c
m
166.0(
c
c�
16.2 - —
1 : 182.2 i
c�
6A a
E
-20.0(
w
0
-200.0(
0
-20.0( a
Q.
Q
-35.0(
U*)N
5 co
2,975.0(
D r
220.0( N
1 : 2,920.0( o
N
S Y
U
H� E
29.0( 'ca
14.3E
44
E t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
222462 10/20/2016 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC (Continued)
K582578
222463 10/20/2016 075432 POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES IF-1262889
222464 10/20/2016 073988 PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING W15501
W 15502
222465 10/20/2016 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200016558856
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
WWTP: LEV USE CORRECT ITEM
LEV USE CORRECT ITEM 156486
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Tota
INV#IF-1262889 - EDMONDS PD -
PTH-IIIA HELMETS
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.35.00
Tota
STREET - CONCRETE GRINDING/
STREET - CONCRETE GRINDING/
111.000.68.542.61.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.61.48.00
STREET - CONCRETE GRINDING/
STREET - CONCRETE GRINDING/
111.000.68.542.61.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.61.48.00
Tota
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / M
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / M
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
4.2.a
Page: 34
c
ca
lid
U
W
_ Amoun };
0
a
-29.0( -0a
-14.3£ 4)
L
1
4.
26.4' c
m
14.3E
c�
4.0( o
I : 44.75 j,
c�
a
H
E
cu
1,760.0( 6
4-
0
11.3(
1 : 1,771.3( 0
L
Q
l Q
8,412.5( N
w
824.4:
r
O
N
2,467.5( c
N
241.8,
1: 11,946.2E E
E
E
75.0(
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 34
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222465 10/20/2016 046900 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
222466 10/20/2016 030695 PUMPTECH INC
222467 10/20/2016 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
222468 10/20/2016 070955 R&R STAR TOWING
222469 10/20/2016 074156 RAZZ CONSTRUCTION INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
Tota
0107749-IN
WWTP: CREDIT AGAINST INV.010
Diaphragm-hypalon neoprene billed
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
0109579-IN
WWTP: MECH. SEAL THREADED
MECH. SEAL THREADED
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Tota
00000166981
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-KRANZLE
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-KRANZLE
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
00000168654
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HARRISO
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-HARRISO
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 35
c
ca
lid
U
a�
_ Amoun };
1 : 75.0E a
m
7
m
-248.0(
-14.2(
m
-25.7'
c
c�
1,194.0(
ca
a
22.5(
119.2' U
1 : 1,047.7: o
R c
R a
125.0( Q
N
N `n
N
125.0(
1 : 250.0(
r
116861 INV#116861 - EDMONDS PD
o
TOW 2005 HONDA CIVIC #AUV345E
N
0
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
166.0( w
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
16.2 , E
E4MB.Pmt 7
E4MB.PMT 7 THRU 9/30/16
E4MB.Pmt 7 thru 9/30/16
016.000.66.594.19.65.00
Tota
182.2,
c
23,076.5( t
Page: 35
Packet Pg. 58
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
222469 10/20/2016 074156 074156 RAZZ CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)
222470 10/20/2016 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 624811
222471 10/20/2016 072440 SCORDINO, JOE
222472 10/20/2016 074906 SITE WORKSHOP LLC
222473 10/20/2016 036955 SKY NURSERY
0
4300
T-0811235
T-0812497
222474 10/20/2016 075628 SNO CO DEPT OF EMERG MGMT 1000418514
Description/Account
Tota
INV#624811 CUST #1733 - EDMO
CLEANFIRE 40 S&W 180GR
001.000.41.521.23.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.23.31.00
Tota
E7FG.REIMBURSEMENT FOR ST
E7FG.Reimbursement for Students
001.000.39.554.90.49.00
Tota
VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE A
VETERANS PLAZA LANDSCAPE A
132.000.64.594.76.41.00
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 36
c
ca
U
a�
_ Amoun };
I: 23,076.5E a
m
NE
m
4,566.6(
447.5< c
1 : 5,014.1;
UC
c
S f°
410.7: o
I : 410.7< ca
a
R E
R .2
1,442.0( ,-
I: 1,442.0( c
c�
N o
N Q-
Q.
279.8: Q
LO
04
26.5E
m
r
109.9� c
N
0
10.4E
1 : 426.8!
E
11,658.2E
Total: 11,658.2! y
E
222475 10/20/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0255-4 WWTP: 9/3-10/4/16 FLOW METER 2
R
.r
r
a
Page: 36
Packet Pg. 59
FLOWER PROGRAM LIBRARY CO
FLOWER PROGRAM LIBRARY CO
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
PM:CYPRESS
PM:CYPRESS
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
Tota
Q4-2016 EMERGENCY SERVICES
Q4-2016 Emergency Services
001.000.39.525.60.51.00
UC
c
S f°
410.7: o
I : 410.7< ca
a
R E
R .2
1,442.0( ,-
I: 1,442.0( c
c�
N o
N Q-
Q.
279.8: Q
LO
04
26.5E
m
r
109.9� c
N
0
10.4E
1 : 426.8!
E
11,658.2E
Total: 11,658.2! y
E
222475 10/20/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0255-4 WWTP: 9/3-10/4/16 FLOW METER 2
R
.r
r
a
Page: 36
Packet Pg. 59
FLOWER PROGRAM LIBRARY CO
FLOWER PROGRAM LIBRARY CO
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
PM:CYPRESS
PM:CYPRESS
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
Tota
Q4-2016 EMERGENCY SERVICES
Q4-2016 Emergency Services
001.000.39.525.60.51.00
4.2.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 37
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code : usbank
U
a�
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
222475 10/20/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
(Continued)
a
9/3-10/4/16 WWTP: FLOW METER 2
m
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
17.9E
2002-6027-1
YOST POOL
a�
L
YOST POOL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,247.3E
2004-9683-4
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
w
c
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
64.7 ,
2007-2302-1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
o
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
26.3( j,
2008-6924-6
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACF
f°
a
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD BLEACF
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
43.5z
2011-8453-8
HICKMAN PARK
HICKMAN PARK
o
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
93.9E
2014-3123-6
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
o
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
L
Q-
Q.
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
17.4, Q
2014-3124-4
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC
LO
coo
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
16.8E
2014-4175-5
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
r
0
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
308.1 z N
2014-5305-7
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
c
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
(n
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
150.9'
2019-2988-2
WWTP: 9/3-10/4/16 FLOW METER 8
E
WWTP 9/3-10/4/16 FLOW METER 8,
f°
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
17.9E
2022-5062-7
9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED
m
9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED
E
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
17.4,
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 37
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222475 10/20/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
222476 10/20/2016 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
222477 10/20/2016 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
2022-8945-0
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
2025-4064-7
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
2025-7952-0
WWTP: 9/1-9/30/16 ENERGY MGMT
9/1-9/30/16 WWTP ENERGY MANA,
423.000.76.535.80.47.61
2036-5215-1
FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191
FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
2044-2584-7
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
2202-1638-6
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
2205-4757-4
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
Tota I :
2016-3389 AUG 2016 INMATE MEDICAL CHAR(
INMATE MEDS - AUG 2016
001.000.39.523.60.31.00
SCJ INMATE MEDS 8/16 CREDIT FOR SCJ INMATE MEDS - F
CREDIT FOR INMATE MEDS - AUG
001.000.39.523.60.31.00
Total
69169 PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES
PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
ILLEGAL DUMPING
4.2.a
Page: 38
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
78.3E
L
4-
16.8E c
m
9.1z
0
122.0, a
E
58.2
4-
0
c�
66.6< o
L
a
Q.
Q
42.9'
LO
2,416.9E coo
T-
m
r
266.8E N
0
N
-148.9E cYi
117.8� E
r
c
792.0( E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 38
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222477 10/20/2016 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
222478 10/20/2016 038100 SNO-KING STAMP
222479 10/20/2016 069844 SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PLLC
222480 10/20/2016 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
4.2.a
Page: 39
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
0-
15.0( m
Total : 807.0( 41
60489 INV#60489 - EDMONDS PD
LOCKER MAGNET - POLAND
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
MAGMATE PLATES - POLAND
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
1160917-1
1161007-1
1161007-2
1161012-1
80758/1
Tota
WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS
Water Supply Improvements Projec
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS
Water Supply Improvements
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
WATER SYSTEM TECH SUPPORT
Water System Tech Support
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS
Water Supply Improvements User
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
Tota
SEWER - WORK COVERALLS
Sewer - Work Coveralls
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
Water - Work Jacket
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
Freight
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
t
a�
L
=a
4.5(
m
6.0(
c
c�
2.71 o
1.3( a
I : 14.5E
F U
w
0
9,960.0(
0
a
3,660.0( Q
LO
N
559.8'
Gu
1,920.0( N
I : 16,099.8' o
N
E
112.9E '�
60.5(
m
E
8.8,
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 39
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222480 10/20/2016 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
222481 10/20/2016 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.24.00
9.8% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
L116829 09-16 AUDIT FEES
09-16 Audit Fees
001.000.39.514.20.51.00
09-16 Audit Fees
111.000.68.543.30.51.00
09-16 Audit Fees
421.000.74.534.80.51.00
09-16 Audit Fees
422.000.72.531.90.51.00
09-16 Audit Fees
423.000.75.535.80.51.00
09-16 Audit Fees
423.000.76.535.80.51.00
09-16 Audit Fees
511.000.77.548.68.51.00
222482 10/20/2016 066574 STATE OF WA SECRETARY OF STATE 00007084
222483 10/20/2016 071585 STERICYCLE INC
3003589252
Tota
4.2.a
Page: 40
c
ca
lid
U
W
Amoun };
0
a
a)
4.7<
a�
L
11.9z =a
4
6.3�
205.3:
c
ca
0
508.1,
ca
a
15.0'
185.0z
4-
0
99.3:
�a
0
L
261.5,
a
Q
68.5z
LO
co
26.1 �
Total:
1,163.7E w
r
INV#00007084 - CITY CLERKS
N
SCAN PAPER DOCUMENTS - GRAE
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
1,729.2' Y
Total:
1,729.2' u
E
INV#3003589252 CUST#6076358 - E
ca
MINIMUM MONTHLY SERVICE CHG
001.000.41.521.80.41.00
10.3( c
Tota
Page: 40
Packet Pg. 63
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222484 10/20/2016 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC
222485 10/20/2016 027269 THE PART WORKS INC
222486 10/20/2016 049500 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST
222487 10/20/2016 074249 THORNQUIST, LINDA
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.2.a
Page: 41
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun j
19850
WATER - EDMONDS / SEATTLE INT
rn
a
Water - Edmonds / Seattle Intertie
m
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
714.0(
19857
WATER - SEATTLE INTERTIE TROU
a�
L
Water - Seattle Intertie Troubleshootir
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
242.0(
19932
SEWER - POINT EDWARDS OIU
c
Sewer - Point Edwards OIU
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
377.3(
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
36.9E o
Total:
1,370.31, j,
c�
a
INV03289
FAC - PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FAC - Plumbing Supplies
E
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
150.3. 6
Freight
p
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7.6:
9.8% Sales Tax
p
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
L
15.4E m
Total:
173.4! Q
834869548
COURT MANUALS
N
COURT MANUALS
co
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
378.8.
Total:
378.8, r
0
LThornquist2016
TRAINING CONFERENCE CHELAN-
c
mileage reimbursment 334 mi X.54
w
001.000.62.524.20.43.00 180.3(
Hotel costs E
001.000.62.524.20.43.00 280.2, 'W
WSAPT Conference U
001.000.62.524.20.49.00 90.0(
Total: 550.5E
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 41
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
222488
10/20/2016 075141 TREATMENT EQUIPMENT COMPANY
1495
WWTP: MEDIA 55# SACKS
MEDIA 55# SACKS
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
222489
10/20/2016 070902 ULVESTAD, KAREN
5066 DIGITAL PHOTO
5066 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY INSI
5066 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY INSI
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
222490
10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
2519
INV#2519 10/06/16 - EDMONDS PD
MAIL UNIFORM ITEMS TO BRATWE
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
VARIDEST FOR RICHARDSON
001.000.41.521.21.31.00
LODGING/COLL RECON/SACKVILLI
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
CRASH DATA RENEWAL
001.000.41.521.71.35.00
2985
WWTP: 10/2016 CC AMAZON/SEAT'
Amazon: Pens, Post -it notes, binding
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Evergreen Safety Council: Forklift
423.000.76.535.80.49.71
3249
HOTEL FOR JUDGE'S CONFERENC
HOTEL FOR JUDGE'S CONFERENC
001.000.23.512.50.43.00
POSTAGE FOR PASSPORTS
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
3314
INV#3314 10/06/16 - LAWLESS - ED
COLEMAN INSTANT CANOPY
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 42
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
4,300.0(
4)
475.0( =a
4
467.9( c
5,242.9(
c
c�
0
112.5( ">%
112.5( a
E
.2
U
11.2 0
to
395.0( c
L
a
379.5( Q
899.0( N
w
m
309.2( r
0
N
265.0(
N
Y
109.5, E
70.9E
r
c
m
E
294.8,
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 42
Packet Pg. 65
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222490 10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
LOW ROLL TRAINING KIT
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
TRAINING SIMULATOR MAINT KI
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
LOW ROLL TRAINING SIMILATOR
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
TRAINING SIMILATOR END CAPS
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
20XP LED BATTERIES
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
REG/CDR TECH CLASS/STRUM
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
3520 INV#3520 10/06/16 POLICE #2 - E
SHARPS CONTAINERS
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
HALO CHEST VENTS
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
HANDGUN PISTOL SAFE
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
MEALS/SWAT ADV/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
MEAL/SWAT ADV/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
FEDEX CHG #16-17518
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG #16-225904,22981
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG RETURN SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FEDEX CHG #16-22287
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
MEAL/SWAT ADV/LIM
4.2.a
Page: 43
T
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
am
498.6�
�
34.4: =a
4.
670.6, c
m
171.5:
c�
117.8� o
L
285.0( a
E
12.0( 'ca
DP
w
0
99.7,
0
L
87.4E a
Q
57.9E Ul)
N
co
24.1,
m
r
6.7E o
N
0
17.5�
N
15.3z
ca
14.5'
Page: 43
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222490 10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
FOOD/SWAT ADV/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
MEAL/SWAT ADV/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
STEEL WALL SAFE
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
DYMO ADDRESS LABELS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
FOOD/SWAT ADV/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
MEAL/SWAT ADV/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
FOOD/SWAT AVD/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
MEAL/SWAT ADV/LIM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
FEDEX CHG #16-23761
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
FOOD/CNOA/POFF
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
MEAL/CNOA/POFF
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
FOOD/CNOA/POFF
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
LODGING/CNOA/POFF
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
3520
INV#3520 10/06/16 - POLICE 2 - C
RETURN HANDGUN SAFE
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
G REFUND POLICE CAR CUTOUTS-
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
4675
4675 PARKS CREDIT CARD
AMAZON: LAMINATING POUCHE
4.2.a
Page: 44
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
8.5( -0)
U
3.9�
=a
51.0(
aD
c
35.2�
27.7( c�a
S
0
5.1E L>%
ca
a
34.91
3.9� U
0
26.4E
0
L
15.31 a
Q
63.4( Ul)
N
co
28.1(
m
r
37.1 < o
N
0
120.0(
RI
U
-40.6 1
C
-64.9E
m
E
U
R
.r
r
a
Page: 44
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222490 10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
FASTSIGNS: WOTS STANDS
117.100.64.573.20.35.00
WSU: RECERTAND IPM WORKSHC
001.000.64.576.80.49.00
AMAZON: CLOCK FOR ROOM 123
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
AMAZON: LOCK FOR KITCHEN CAE
001.000.64.571.29.31.00
AMAZON: STAMP FOR GYMNASTIC
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
AMAZON: CUTSHIELD SLEEVE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
AMAZON: STAMPS FOR GYMNASTI
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
AMAZON: STAMPS
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
AMAZON: WOTS SUPPLIES
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
AMAZON: PRESCHOOL PROGRAM
001.000.64.571.28.31.00
AMAZON: FOOTBALL GOAL POST I`
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
LOWES: STEP LADDER FOR STATIi
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
LOWES: SHELVES FOR DISCOVER
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
PANNERA: WOTS LUNCHES
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
OBDK: OWL PELLETS FOR CAMPS
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
AMAZON: DOCENT VESTS FOR VO
001.000.64.571.23.24.00
ORIENTAL TC: CAMP PRIZES/SUPF
4.2.a
Page: 45
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
a
46.9 1
535.0' a0i
L
=a
720.0(
aD
c
11.9£
9.0( c�a
0
10.9� L>%
ca
a
57.0(
31.9� U
0
15.3£
0
L
10.9£ a
Q
25.4E LO
N
co
45.8(
m
r
64.9' o
N
0
149.2£
N
2,168.4E U
66.4: U
Page: 45
Packet Pg. 68
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222490 10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
AW POTTERY: POTS PURCHASE
127.000.64.575.50.31.00
4697
AWC REGIONAL MEETING
Fine point marking pens
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
post it notes
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
9V batteries
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
binder clips
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
shipping & handling
001.000.21.513.10.31.00
11x17 flyer paper
138.100.21.557.21.31.00
shipping & handling
138.100.21.557.21.31.00
cold cups
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
shipping & handling
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
hot cups
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
AWC Regional Meeting
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
5593
RECORDING FEES, STANDING D
SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDI
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDI
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
DESK RISER - RECORDS MNGMT
001.000.25.514.30.31.00
USB FLASH DRIVE 4GB
4.2.a
Page: 46
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
N
0
a
42.9( -0)
D +.
1,725.0( m
4.
8.1( c
m
18.5(
c�
7.9: o
L
6.1( a
E
w
35.7� 0
8.4: o
a
0.
38.0( Q
LO
04
3.0(
70.5(
r
0
45.0( c
EF
NC Y
153.0(
NC w
153.0( 6
565.4:
t
R
.r
r
a
Page: 46
Packet Pg. 69
4.2.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 47
10/20/2016
8:20:56AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
a�
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
222490
10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
(Continued)
a
001.000.25.514.30.31.00
33.6 1 m
5923
REFRESHMENTS, HERALD SUBSC
Refreshments for survey open house
L
001.000.61.557.20.49.00
9.9� ia
Annual subscription to Everett Herald
;'
001.000.61.557.20.49.00
99.9E
Office Space.com monthly website foi
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
100.0(
7476
INV#7476 10/06/16 - BARD - EDMO�
SUPERSAAS TRAINING
o
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
23.0( j,
TLO SEARCHES 09/2016
a
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
37.2E E
7483
OCTOBER MAYOR'S MEETING LUN
.@
October Mayor's Meeting Luncheon
U
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
13.0( o
Leg agenda luncheon meeting
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
35.5E o
Civic field/Boys & Girls club luncheon Q-
Q.
001.000.21.513.10.49.00 29.4z Q
8017 ENG CREDIT CARD CHARGES THR
E7FG.Photometer Kit
N
001.000.39.554.90.49.00
2,776.0,
Hague.MRSC Contracting Workshop:
m
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
r
70.0( c
Hauss.ITE September 2016 Meeting
N
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
55.0(
9-Volt Batteries for Smart Level
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
19.9E
Edwards-APWA Membership Dues
E
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
117.0( U
Installation of PVC Water & Sewer
r
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
49.0(
Hauss-ITE Membership Dues
E
t
R
.r
r
a
Page: 47
Packet Pg. 70
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222490 10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
8304
OCT2016 HR VISA BILL
WA HR ACADEMY REGISTRATION
001.000.22.518.10.49.00
CRAIGSLIST JOB POSTING: COU
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
CRAIGSLIST JOB POSTING: GYM
001.000.22.518.10.41.40
LODGING FOR MAH AT WAPELR
4.2.a
Page: 48
A
c
ca
lid
U
W
Amoun };
0
a
300.0( -0a
1.9( aUi
L
=a
( 4-
700.0( c
90.0(
Ni c�
90.0( o
110.9( a
E
n •�
209.0( U
4-
0
87.6. >
0
394.0( a
Q
115.2E ,n
N
co
120.7E
m
r
164.60 c
N
0
184.4.
N
32.9:
GE
17.5(
S
R
.r
r
a
Page: 48
Packet Pg. 71
4.2.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 49
10/20/2016
8:20:56AM
City of Edmonds
ca
lid
Bank code :
usbank
U
a�
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun };
222490
10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
(Continued)
a
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
16.1: m
9821
INV#9821 10/06/16 GREENMUN - LC
S
TRANS LODGING TO CARD #2519
L
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
-75.9(
BID-1687
POSTAGE, BIKE RACK REPLACEMI
Replacement of damaged bike rack.
w
c
140.000.61.558.70.31.00
1,136.1
Postage to return sample umbrellas
140.000.61.558.70.49.00
15.6'
Total:
19,481.9( _
222491 10/20/2016 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0689764-WA
222492 10/20/2016 075821 US REIF FIRDALE VILLAGE WA LLC BLD20160955
222493 10/20/2016 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC
222494 10/20/2016 063439 WA DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE
8046444859
9357
222495 10/20/2016 069582 WAGNER CONSTRUCTION 023
WATER - DOT EXAM
Water - DOT Exam
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
Tota
REFUND- PERMIT, BLD20160955
REFUND- PERMIT, BLD20160955
001.000.257.620
Tota
WWTP: TUBING SL .375X.625 IN 5
TUBING SL .375X.625 IN 50-FT
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Tota
E3FE.HPA PERMIT APPLICATION
E3FE.HPA Permit Application Fee-
422.200.72.594.31.41.00
Tota
LOG CABIN - CLEAN, STAIN, MAIN
Log Cabin - Clean, Stain, Maint
120.000.31.575.42.41.50
0
L
a
99.0( •�
1 : 99.0(
4-
Al
AI c
1,105.5( a
I : 1,105.5( Q
0 u)
N
co
135.3'
m
r
13.2E N
1 : 148.51 o
FI w
U
150.0(
150.0( 6
r
T
m
E
t
3,700.0(
.r
r
a
Page: 49
Packet Pg. 72
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222495 10/20/2016 069582 WAGNER CONSTRUCTION
222496 10/20/2016 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
222497 10/20/2016 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS
222498 10/20/2016 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
9.8% Sales Tax
120.000.31.575.42.41.50
Tota
117002291
INV#117002291 EDM301 - EDMON
BACKGROUND CHECKS-SEPT 20
001.000.237.100
Tota
116-592
STREET - TREE REMOVAL - 7915
Street - Tree Removal - 7915 201 st
111.000.68.542.71.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.71.48.00
116-593
STREET - TREE REMOVAL 711 OL
Street - Tree Removal 711 Olympic
111.000.68.542.71.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.71.48.00
Tota
9773302
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9775457
FAC MAINT - CLEANING SUPPLIE
Fac Maint - Cleaning Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9786454
FAC MAINT - VAC FILTERS
Fac Maint - Vac Filters
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
4.2.a
Page: 50
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
0-
a)
362.6(
I: 4,062.6( i
=a
D7
11 �
250.7E
I : 250.7E
c
2( f°
0
L
700.0( M
a
68.6( .
Y f°
U
A, 4-
0
680.0( 0
0
66.6z a
1 : 1,515.2, Q
LO
N
co
135.4( "
to
r
13.2 N
S c
N
1,050.3.
E
102.9: 'ca
c
339.6(
t
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 50
Packet Pg. 73
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
222498 10/20/2016 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
222499 10/20/2016 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
222500 10/20/2016 074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH
222501 10/20/2016 072939 WESTERN WHOLESALE SUPPLY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
7181
7182
SEP-16
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 51
c
ca
lid
U
a�
Amoun };
0
0-
33.2E m
Total: 1,674.8(
INV#7181 - EDMONDS PD
1,000 CRIMINAL TRESPASS WAR
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
1 TIME NEW SET UP CHARGE
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
INV#7182 - EDMONDS PD
167 INVENTORY/RETURN FORMS
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
Tota
INV#SEP-16 CUST ID-EDMONDS
RANGE USAGE-GAGNER 9/2/16
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
RANGE USAGE-MCINTYRE 9/21/1
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
RANGE USAGE-JOHNSEN 9/22/1
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
RANGE USAGE-HWANG 9/28/16
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
297365 TRAFFIC - TRANSFER TAPE
Traffic - Transfer tape
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Tota
P[
a�
L
=a
NI "
308.0(
m
25.0(
c
c�
32.6< o
0
a
78.0( E
.2
7.6z U
1 : 451.2 0
o
0-
13.6E Q
6
13.6E N
6 tO
13.6(
r
13.6( N
0
5.3( w
I : 60.0( cYi
E
93.7,
m
E
9.1E
R
.r
r
Q
Page: 51
Packet Pg. 74
vchlist
10/20/2016 8:20:56AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
222501 10/20/2016 072939 072939 WESTERN WHOLESALE SUPPLY (Continued)
222502 10/20/2016 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 18060
222503 10/20/2016 075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR
222504 10/20/2016 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC
126 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
126 Vouchers in this report
Description/Account
Tota
PM: VINE MAPLE
PM: VINE MAPLE
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
4.2.a
Page: 52
c
ca
U
a�
_ Amoun };
1 : 102.9( a
am
m
28.0(
2.7z c
Total :
30.71 a)
SEPT 2016 EPD SEPT 2016 INMATE HOUSING & ME
c
INMATE HOUSING - SEPT 2016 - 21
f°
001.000.39.523.60.51.00
3,120.7E o
INMATE MEDS SEPT 2016
001.000.39.523.60.31.00
5.41
INMATE HOSPITAL SERVICES
001.000.39.523.60.41.00
202.0( TU
Total:
3,328.2, o
1069.2 SEPT-16 RETAINER
f°
Monthly Retainer
a
001.000.36.515.33.41.00
17,430.0( o
Appeal Review 5z0201665 / 16-1-OOC
001.000.36.515.33.41.00
312.5( N
Motions 3.5 hearing EMC 6z0407289
co
001.000.36.515.33.41.00
300.0( "
Total :
to
18,042.5(
Bank total :
0
1,010,863.3, c
Total vouchers :
1.010.863.31
Page: 52
Packet Pg. 75
Y
V
E
fC
V
a+
Q
4.2.b
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 1 -0
10/20/2016
11:29:10AM
City of Edmonds
Y
m
Bank code :
usbank
U
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
.W
Description/Account Amoun p
Q.
222505
10/20/2016 075764 MCCLURE AND SONS INC
c465-1Construction
WWTP: C465 CLARIFIER PROJ COI
Construction services through 9/15/1( U
423.100.76.594.39.65.10 234,972.0(
Retainage r
423.100.223.400-10,700.0( m
Total: 224,272.0( y
222506
10/20/2016 062693 US BANK
0781
COUNCIL CREDIT CARD
c
SCC Registration Fee - Paypal Snoh(
001.000.11.511.60.49.00 35.0( p
SCC Registraiton Fee - Paypal Snoh(
001.000.11.511.60.49.00 35.0( a
Council Office Supplies - The Papery
001.000.11.511.60.31.00 10.5(
Council Office Supplies - Office Depo
001.000.11.511.60.31.00 24.9�
9.8% Sales Tax
001.000.11.511.60.31.00 3.4( o
Total: 108.8t a
a
2
Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total : 224,380.8�
N
t0
2
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers : 224,380.8$ r
to
0
N
O
r
N
Y
V
E
.2
V
C
N
E
t
V
fC
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 76
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STM
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
c484
E5FE
STR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
STM
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
c491
E61FE
SWR
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
c390
E2GB
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c398
E3GA
STR
2014 Chip Seals
c451
E4CB
STM
2014 Drainage Improvements
c433
E41FA
STM
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STR
2014 Overlay Program
c438
E4CA
WTR
2014 Waterline Overlays
c452
E4CC
STM
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
c466
E51FA
STR
2015 Overlay Program
c463
E5CA
SWR
2015 Sewerline Overlays
i007
E5CC
SWR
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
c441
E4GA
STR
2015 Traffic Calming
c471
E5AB
WTR
2015 Waterline Overlays
c475
E5CB
WTR
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
c440
E4J13
STR
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
i016
E6DC
STR
2016 Overlay Program
i008
E6CA
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c469
E5GA
SWR
2016 Sewerline Overlays
i010
E6CC
WTR
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
c460
E4JC
WTR
2016 Waterline Overlays
i009
E6CB
WTR
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
c468
E5JA
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
i013
E6GA
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6J13
SWR
2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
c492
E6GC
WTR
2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project
c493
E6JC
STR
220th Street Overlay Project
c462
E4CD
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
WTR
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
c418
E3J13
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STM
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
i012
E6FC
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
STR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
c392
E2AB
FAC
A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
c476
E51-A
STR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
STR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
PRK
City Spray Park
c417
E41VIA
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c456
E4GB
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
STR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 77
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
E5J13
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
E1 FM
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c472
E5FC
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
General
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
c478
E5DB
FAC
ESCO III Project
c419
E3LB
PRK
FAC Band Shell Replacement
c477
E6MB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E5KA
STR
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
E8MA
STR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s011
E5G13
STM
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
c434
E4FB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E2FA
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
i011
E61FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E3FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
c376
E1 FN
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
FAC
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
c444
E4LA
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
E5FD
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
STR
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
c427
E3AB
STR
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
c454
E4DB
STR
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
s014
E6AA
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
STM
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
c429
E3FG
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1DA
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
c430
E3FH
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
STR
Train Trench - Concept
c453
E4DA
STR
Transportation Plan Update
c391
E2AA
STM
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
c467
E5FB
UTILITIES
Utility Rate Update
s013
E6JA
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
STM
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
c459
E4FF
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
E5HA
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 78
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
1AA
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR
ElCA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
-
E1DA
W
Sunset Walkway Improveme
STM
E1 FM
c374
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
moor—
errinville Creek Culvert Replacemen
STR
E2AA
c391
Transportation Plan Update
9th Avenue Improvement Projectis
STR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvement
STM
E2FB
c379
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Studl
c380
SWR
E2GB
c390
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
c427
Corridor Transportation Stud
STR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR
R"
c424 IF
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Av
STR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR
E3DE
c426
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STM
E3FC
c408
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Driv
STM
E3FG
c429
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
ElrS
W Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
SWR
E3GA
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
location (2013
FAC
E3LB
c419
ESCO III Project
STR
E4CA
c43
2014 Overlay Program i
STR
E4CB
c451
2014 Chip Seals
WTR
E4CC
2014 Waterline Overlays
STR
E4CD
c462
220th Street Overlay Project
STR
Train Trench - Concept
STR
E4DB
c454
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
STM
014 Drainage Improvements W
STM
E4FB
c434
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM
c435
ek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
STM
E4FF
c459
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
SWR
E4GA
c441
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
SWR
E4GB
c456
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c440
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR
E4JC
c460
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
F
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
PRK
E4MA
c417
City Spray Park
F
dmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
STR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 79
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
E5AB
2015 Traffic Calming
STIR
E5CA
c463
2015 Overlay Program
E5CB
Epw
2015 Waterline Overlays
SWR
E5CC
i007
2015 Sewerline Overlays
c474
Bikelink Project
General
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM
E5FB
c467
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
rSTM
E5FC
1W
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
STM
E5FE
c48
2th Ave & Sierra StormwatdWstem Improvements
SWR
E5GA
c469
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
SWR
E5GB
0
ke Ballinger Trunk Sewer Stu
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5JA
c468
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR
E5J13
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
FAC
E5LA
c476
A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
UTILITIES
E5NA
tandard Details Updates
STIR
E6AA
s014
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
STIR
llff'i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6CA
i008
2016 Overlay Program
WTR
i009 7r
2016 Waterline Overlays
SWR
E6CC
i010
2016 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E6DA
c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STIR
E6DB
s016
ADA Transition Plan
STIR
E6DC
i016
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STM
E6FA
i011
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
WTA c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
STM
E6FC
i012
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
KTM
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
STM
E6FE
c491
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
WR
i013
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
SWR
c492
2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
WTR
E6,113
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects ilk
WTR
E6JC
c493
2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project
PRK
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
PRK
E6MB
c477
FAC Band Shell Replacement
0
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
ayton Street Plaza
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 80
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Protect
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
PM
E7MA
c276
Dayton Street Plaza
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STR
E1AA
c342
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
ElCA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STM
E1 FM
c374
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM
E1 FIN
c376
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM
E2FA
c378
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM
E2FB
c379
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM
E2FC
c380
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR
E2GB
c390
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STIR
E2AA
c391
Transportation Plan Update
STIR
E2AB
c392
9th Avenue Improvement Project
SWR
E3GA
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
STIR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM
E3FC
c408
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM
EYE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
PRK
E4MA
c417
City Spray Park
WTR
E3JB
c418
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC
E3LB
c419
ESCO III Project
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STIR
E3DC
c424
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STIR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STIR
E3DE
c426
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STIR
E3AB
c427
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STM
E3FG
c429
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM
E3FH
c430
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM
E4FA
c433
2014 Drainage Improvements
STM
E4FB
c434
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STIR
E4CA
c438
2014 Overlay Program
WTR
E4J13
c440
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR
E4GA
c441
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
FAC
E4LA
c444
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STIR
E4CB
c451
2014 Chip Seals
WTR
E4CC
c452
2014 Waterline Overlays
STIR
E4DA
c453
Train Trench - Concept
STIR
E4DB
c454
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GB
c456
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
STM
E4FF
c459
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
WTR
E4JC
c460
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 81
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STIR
E4CD
c462
220th Street Overlay Project
STIR
E5CA
c463
2015 Overlay Program
STM
E5FA
c466
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM
E5FB
c467
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
WTR
E5JA
c468
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
SWR
E5GA
c469
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
STIR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
STIR
E5AB
c471
2015 Traffic Calming
STM
E5FC
c472
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
WTR
E5KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
STIR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
WTR
E5CB
c475
2015 Waterline Overlays
FAC
E5LA
c476
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
PRK
E6MB
c477
FAC Band Shell Replacement
General
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
PRK
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5J13
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STM
E5FE
c484
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
STM
E6FE
c491
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
SWR
E6GC
c492
2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E6JC
c493
2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
SWR
E5CC
i007
2015 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E6CA
i008
2016 Overlay Program
WTR
E6CB
i009
2016 Waterline Overlays
SWR
E6CC
i010
2016 Sewerline Overlays
STM
E6FA
i011
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM
E6FC
i012
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
SWR
E6GA
i013
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
E6JB
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6DC
i016
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
SWR
E5GB
s011
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
STIR
E6AA
s014
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
STIR
E6DB
s016
ADA Transition Plan
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 82
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
FAC
A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
c476
E5LA
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
ESCO III Project
c419
E3LB
FAC
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
c444
E41-A
General
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
c478
E5DB
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
E8MA
PRK
City Spray Park
c417
E4MA
PRK
FAC Band Shell Replacement
c477
E6MB
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
STM
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
c484
E5FE
STM
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
c491
E6FE
STM
2014 Drainage Improvements
c433
E4FA
STM
2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
c466
E5FA
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
STM
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
012
E6FC
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
E1 FM
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c472
E5FC
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
STM
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
c434
E4FB
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E2FA
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
011
E6FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E3FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
c376
E1 FN
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
E5FD
STM
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
c429
E3FG
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
c430
E3FH
STM
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
c467
E5FB
STM
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
c459
E4FF
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STIR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
STIR
2014 Chip Seals
c451
E4CB
STIR
2014 Overlay Program
c438
E4CA
STIR
2015 Overlay Program
c463
E5CA
STIR
2015 Traffic Calming
c471
E5AB
STIR
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
016
E6DC
STIR
2016 Overlay Program
i008
E6CA
STIR
220th Street Overlay Project
c462
E4CD
STIR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STIR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 83
4.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
ElCA
STR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
c392
E2AB
STIR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
STR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
STR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
STR
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
STR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
STR
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
c427
E3AB
STR
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
c454
E4DB
STR
SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th)
s014
E6AA
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
STR
Train Trench - Concept
c453
E4DA
STR
Transportation Plan Update
c391
E2AA
SWR
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
c390
E2GB
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c398
E3GA
SWR
2015 Sewerline Overlays
i007
E5CC
SWR
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
c441
E4GA
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c469
E5GA
SWR
2016 Sewerline Overlays
i010
E6CC
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
i013
E6GA
SWR
2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
c492
E6GC
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c456
E4GB
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s011
E5GB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
UTILITIES
Utility Rate Update
s013
E6JA
WTR
2014 Waterline Overlays
c452
E4CC
WTR
2015 Waterline Overlays
c475
E5CB
WTR
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
c440
E4JB
WTR
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
c460
E4JC
WTR
2016 Waterline Overlays
i009
E6CB
WTR
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
c468
E5JA
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
014
E6JB
WTR
2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project
c493
E6JC
WTR
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
c418
E3J13
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
E5JB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E5KA
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
E5HA
Revised 10/19/2016 Packet Pg. 84
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 785 (10/01/2016 to 10/15/2016)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
-ed2
REGULAR HOURS
Educational Pav Correction
0.00
-156.28
111
ABSENT
NO PAY LEAVE
40.00
0.00
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
624.00
22,149.74
122
VACATION
VACATION
835.75
35,019.62
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
64.25
2,646.60
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
39.00
1,289.43
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
110.00
4,289.64
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
195.50
8,455.57
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
32.00
1,472.80
132
JURY DUTY
JURY DUTY
18.00
561.45
141
BEREAVEMENT
BEREAVEMENT
71.00
3,225.51
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kellv Dav Used
72.00
3,165.48
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
69.66
2,890.70
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
16,058.80
617,977.07
196
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
27.25
1,009.64
205
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME .5
11.50
195.07
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
14.68
478.41
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
48.00
2,341.81
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
24.00
2,177.67
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
239.75
15,472.52
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
39.75
2,599.66
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,221.64
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
436.50
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP
17.00
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME
153.00
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME
15.50
0.00
902
MISCELLANEOUS
BOOT ALLOWANCE
0.00
113.60
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
24.95
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
143.91
boc
MISCELLANEOUS
BOC 11 Certification
0.00
84.53
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstruction ist
0.00
107.89
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
147.28
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION Ill PAY
0.00
626.36
m
cQ
c00„ 0/201')ni F
Attachment:
payroll summary 10-20-16
(1625 : Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct
deposit, checks and wire payments.)
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 785 (10/01/2016 to 10/15/2016)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
75.00
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
102.75
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
989.84
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
793.44
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
891.06
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
5,117.28
fmla
ABSENT
FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID
37.50
0.00
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
102.75
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
888.29
Ig10
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY 5.5%
0.00
396.36
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
737.53
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
842.56
Iq3
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY 6%
0.00
5,893.68
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
240.75
Ici6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
275.57
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1.5%
0.00
931.11
Iq9
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3.5%
0.00
82.46
mels
SICK
Medical Leave Sick
160.00
6,109.00
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
200.57
nds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
47.12
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
1,970.13
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
0.00
157.56
sd2.5%
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY 2.5%
0.00
153.41
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%
0.00
207.68
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
157.56
slw
SICK
SICK LEAVE ADD BACK
447.15
0.00
str
MISCELLANEOUS
STREET CRIMES
0.00
418.92
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
323.67
19,465.04
$758,274.82
Total Net Pay:
$507,662.87
m
cQ
cO 0/20
Attachment: payroll summary 10-20-16
(1625 : Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.)
P-
N
porn 2 o a
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 785 - 10/01/2016 to 10/15/2016
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
62368
10/20/2016
chapl
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
50.00
0.00
62369
10/20/2016
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
2,983.50
0.00
62370
10/20/2016
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
388.00
0.00
62371
10/20/2016
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
739.99
0.00
62372
10/20/2016
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
4,927.00
0.00
62373
10/20/2016
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
2,149.81
0.00
11,238.30
0.00
Bank: wire -
US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
2460
10/20/2016
awc
AW C
325,413.61
0.00
2463
10/20/2016
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N3177B1
89,178.46
0.00
2464
10/20/2016
us
US BANK
105,740.82
0.00
2465
10/20/2016
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
19,917.00
0.00
2468
10/20/2016
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
5,665.92
0.00
2469
10/20/2016
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
158.00
0.00
2470
10/20/2016
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
647.50
0.00
546,721.31
0.00
Grand Totals:
0.00
557,959.61
P-
N
'Doge 1 io
Attachment: payroll benefits 10-20-16 (1625 : Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.)
4.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Authorization for Mayor to Sign an Amendment to Washington State Recreation and Conservative Office
Salmon Project
Staff Lead: Carrie Hite
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On March 3, 2015, Council authorized the Mayor to sign Salmon Project Agreement (Project Number 14-
1299P) for the Willow Creek Daylighting Project.
On October 18, 2016, staff presented this item to Council and it was forwarded to the October 25th
consent agenda for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the amendment.
Narrative
This grant was awarded and secured by the City of Edmonds from the Recreation and Conservation
Office (RCO) Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) in December 2014. Originally, the grant's scope
of work was for 30% design of the Willow Creek daylighting project. RCO Technical Review Panel
requested the City consider using this grant to develop an alternative tidal channel alignment across
the Unocal property that would enhance habitat for fish and other wildlife. SRFB Technical Review
panel also requested the City study water quality and soil quality in the marsh as it pertains to a fish
access and exposure. City of Edmonds staff and consultant, Keeley O'Connell, agreed that it would be
beneficial and timely to utilize the grant funding to explore better habitat options for daylighting
Willow Creek, and studying water quality and soil quality specifically as it pertains to fish habitat in the
marsh. The revised project description is on the "Amendment Agreement Description" page of the
amendment.
Staff recommends approval of the amendment to allow staff and the consultant to proceed with the
revised scope of work.
Packet Pg. 88
Natural Resources Building
1111 Washington St SE
Olympia WA 98501
PO Box 40917
Olympia WA 98504-0917
September 16, 2016
Dave Earling
City of Edmonds
121 5th Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
�•`� 5W,4. o�
e l
Ix �
x
n
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RECREATION AND CONSERVATION OFFICE
RE: Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design, RCO #14-1299P
Amendment # 1
Dear Mr. Earling:
4.3.a
(360) 90
TTY (360) 902-1996
Fax: (360) 902-3026
E-mail: info@rco.wa.gov
Web site: www.rco.wa.gov
In response to your request to amend the above -referenced Project Agreement, we have
reviewed the circumstances and pertinent RCWs, WACs, and program policies relating to your
request. As a result, I am approving an amendment to the Willow Creek Daylighting
Preliminary Design project.
Enclosed are two original amendments to the Project Agreement. Please sign both
amendments, retain one for your records, and return one original. If you have any questions,
please call Josh Lambert at (360) 725-3935, or send an e-mail to Josh.Lambert@rco.wa.gov.
Sincerely,
4p
Kaleen Cottingh
Director
Enclosures
cc: Keeley O'Connell
Recreation and Conservation Funding Board • Salmon Recovery Funding Board
Washington Invasive Species Council • Governor's Salmon Recovery Office
AMENDCVR.RPT Habitat and Recreation Lands Coordinating Group
Packet Pg. 89
4.3.a
Amendment Special Conditions
Project Sponsor: City of Edmonds
Project Title: Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design
Special Conditions
Project Number: 14-1299 P
Amendment Number: 1
a) Design and Restoration Project Deliverables:
The project will meet the standards for Design and Restoration Project Deliverables described in Manual 18 (2016)
Appendix D-1 "Conceptual Design Deliverables". Submit the following deliverables to your SRFB grants manager
along with any assessment, -data collection summaries and report's, and feasibility deliverables funded in the scope
of work.
a) Description of the project site and the problems within the context of salmon recovery.
b) Identification of specific goals and objectives for addressing the problems.
c) Identification and conceptual design of alternative(s) for achieving the project objectives. Each conceptual
design alternative must include a description of the design and a plan view drawing of existing site conditions
and the proposed project on accurately scaled site plans. The plan view drawing must include an area/location
map, property boundaries (either surveyed or approximated based on assessor's data), landownership, roads or
other infrastructure as appropriate, scale, north arrow, water bodies and direction of flow, bank -full width or
mean high water line for marine waters, and approximate dimensions of proposed elements.
d) Evaluation and discussion of stakeholder comments and the pros and cons of each alternative.
e) Selection of the preferred alternative(s).
f) Rough construction cost estimate of the preferred alternative(s). (optional)
b) Condition: SRFB Review of Draft Conceptual Design: Project sponsor will submit a draft version of conceptual
design deliverables for SRFB review panel design for review and comment. Review may take 30-60 day upon current
work load of review panel members.
c) Condition: Control and Tenure established, and MOU provided to SRFB: Project sponsor will provide a signed
Landowner Acknowledgement Form from WDDOT-Ferries and a written report of negotiations between the City and
WDDOT-Ferries that includes an MOU between these two parties clearly stating the agreed upon preferred alternative
channel alignment across the Unocal property (future WDSOT property) including any communicated intention and/or
commitment from WDDOT-Ferries to adopt or incorporate the concept into their future development of the project
permanent.
d) Cultural Resources
The cultural resources assessment was completed for a portion of the site (the marina beach property) under a prior
phase of the project and is attached in PRISM. The future restoration project will be subject to the National Historic
Preservation Act, Section 106, but preliminary designs may require additional ground disturbing activities for
geotechnical and other investigations. In order to be exempt from Governor's Executive Order 05-05 Archaeological and
Cultural Resources (EO 05-05) as described in Section 9 of this project agreement, sponsor must have an archaeologist
monitor any ground disturbing activities necessary for design development, and incorporate observations and resuats into
the Cultural Resources Assessment that will be prepared for the Section 106 consultation.
Please note, in order for a future RCO funded restoration project to be exempt from EO 05-05, the Section 106 Area of
Potential Effect (APE) must include all ground -disturbing activities (e.g., restoration staging area, riparian planting
areas). The sponsor is encouraged to work with the federal permitting agency to,align the Section 106 APE with the
scope of work subject to a future RCO funded restoration project proposal. If the APE does not include all
ground -disturbing activities proposed for RCO funding, RCO will need to initiate cultural resources consultation following
EO 05-05 for those activities not included in the federal APE.
ASPECCOND.RPT September 16, 2016 1 Packet Pg. 90
4.3.a
Amendment Agreement Description
Project Sponsor: City of Edmonds Project Number: 14-1299 P
Project Title: Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design Amendment Number: 1
Agreement Description
City of Edmonds will use this funding to develop a conceptual design of an alternative channel alignment across the
Unocal property portion of the project. An alternative channel will consider a wider, meandering channel setback from
the railroad tracks that would allow for increased channel complexity, reduced velocities and enhanced habitat value.
This phase of the project will also assess sediment quality in key locations where interior channels for water conveyance
and juvenile salmon habitat enhancement will be located within the marsh, (based on final feasibility findings in planning
project 13-1107) and water quality data of freshwater and stormwater inputs to the marsh. Hydraulic modeling needed
prior to moving into design will be completed during this project phase. This includes modeling habitat conditions of the
daylight channel configuration for channel depth and temperature, modeling operational criteria and layout of the
floodgate, and flows in the daylight channel along Marina Beach Park to assess for potential safety hazards. Lastly, key
communications with stakeholders will continue in this project phase, primarily with Washington Department of
Transportation- Ferries Division who is slated to be the future owner of the Unocal Property. Deliverables for this project
will meet all requirements of Manual 18: Appendix D-1 Conceptual Design Deliverables. In addition, project deliverables
will include a Landowner Acknowledgement Form from WSDOT-Ferries and a report of negotiations between the City
and WSDOT-Ferries that includes an MOU between these two parties clearly stating the preferred alternative channel
alignment across the Unocal property.
The overall goal is restoration of Edmonds Marsh, a remnant barrier estuary located in the nearshore within the City of
Edmonds (WRIA 8). This future restoration action is being designed to benefit juvenile
Chinook salmon.
This project builds upon previous planning grants (11-1553 and 13-1107) focused on feasibility and conceptual design
alternatives for the marsh restoration project.
AAGREEDSC.RPT September 16, 2016 Packet Pg. 91
4.3.a
Amendment Eligible Scope Activities
Project Sponsor: City of Edmonds Project Number:14-1299
Project Title: Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design Project Type: Planning
Program: Salmon Federal Projects Amendment #: 1
Planning Metrics
Worksite #1, Edmonds Marsh
Targeted salmonid ESU/DPS (A.23)
Targeted species (non-ESU species):
Area Encompassed (acres) (B.O.b.1):
Miles of Stream Affected (B.O.b.2):
Chinook Salmon -Puget Sound ESU,
Chum Salmon -Puget Sound/Strait of
Georgia ESU, Coho Salmon -Puget
Sound/Strait of Georgia ESU
Cutthroat
28.0
0.10
Restoration Planning And Coordination Project
Conducting habitat restoration scoping and feasibility studies (B.1.b.8)
Project Identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment (B.1.b.8.a): Draft Puget Sound Salmon Recovery
Plan, Several Authors, June 30, 2005 -
revised December 2005,
http://www.psp.wa.gov/SR_map.php
Shannon&Wilson. 2013. Willow Creek
Daylighting Final- Early Feasibility Study,
Edmonds, WA. Shannon & Wilson, Inc.
400 N 34th St, Suite 100, Seattle, WA
98103. 21-1-12393-206.
a�
a�
U
3
0
c
m
E
c
m
E
a
O
U
N
N
t0
AELIGREIM.RPT September 16, 2016
Packet Pg. 92
Amendment Eligible Scope Activities
4.3.a
Description of the Plan (B.1.b.8.b)-.
Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish
watershed contains two major river
systems, three large lakes, and 80 miles
of shoreline. Species in the WRIA 8
watershed include Chinook, sockeye,
coho, kokanee, steelhead, bull trout, anc
rainbow and coastal cutthroat. Listed
Chinook species include the
Sammamish and Cedar River
populations. Ecosystem Diagnosis and
Treatment will determine the quantitative
goals for in stream and landscape
habitats, and Chinook goals would
increase productivity to twice the current
juvenile survival. Limiting factors for
Chinook include altered hydrology, loss
of floodplain connectivity, lack of riparian
vegetation, disrupted sediment
processes, loss of channel and shorelinE
complexity, fish passage barriers, and
degraded waiver/sedii- lent quality.
Conservation Strategy objectives will
maintain, restore, or enhance watershed
processes that create favorable habitat
characteristics, enhance habitat and
connecting corridors, maintain a
well -dispersed network of high -quality
refuge habitats and connect high quality
and recovered habitats for population
expansion centers. Strategies include
protect and manage upper watershed's
intact habitat, encourage direction of
growth into existing urban areas,
manage rural development to
avoid/reduce impact, restore productivity
and rearing habitat in Cedar and
Sammamish Rivers, and Lake
Washington and tributaries, improve
habitat in Lake Washington and Ship
Canal, and restore the nearshore where
possible.
lie
a�
a�
U
3
0
c
m
E
c
am
E
a
O
U
N
N
co
c
a�
E
c
m
E
a
O
U
r
c
m
E
M
U
R
r
r
Q
AELIGREURPT
September 16, 2016
Pa
Packet Pg. 93
ti WASHINGTON STATE
Recreation and
Conservation Office Amendment to Project Agreement
Project Sponsor: City of Edmonds Project Number: 14-1299P
Project Title: Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design Amendment Number: 1
Amendment Type:
Project Type Change
Amendment Description:
Sponsor has provided a revised budget and scope to amend project type from currently preliminary design, to a
feasibility analysis, bio-geo sampling and analysis, with conceptual design (Appendix D-1) deliverables in response
to SRFB review panel comments. Project will be conditioned, for review of project deliverables and to secure
control and tenure, prior to approving the project to move forward with a preliminary design phase. This project
type change and scope was recommended by and approved by RCO Director in person, on 8/18/2016.
Agreement Terms
In all other respects the Agreement, to which this is an Amendment, and attachments thereto, shall
remain in full force and effect. In witness whereof the parties hereto have executed this Amendment.
State Of Washington
Recreation and Conservation Office
BY: &A
Kaleen Cottinq
TITLE: Director
DATE:��
Pre -approved as to form.
BY /S/
Assistant Attorney General
City of Edmonds
AGENCY:
BY:
TITLE:
DATE:
SAL Project Project Type Change Amendment
General Fund - Federal
AMENAGR1.RPT
RCW
Packet Pg. 94
��- WASHI'J,, 1 O: STATE
Recreation and
Conservation Office Amendment to Project Agreement
Project Sponsor: City of Edmonds Project Number: 14-1299P
Project Title: Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design Amendment Number: 1
Amendment Type:
Project Type Change
Amendment Description:
Sponsor has provided a revised budget and scope to amend project type from currently preliminary design, to a
feasibility analysis, bio-geo sampling and analysis, with conceptual design (Appendix D-1) deliverables in response
to SRFB review panel comments. Project will be conditioned, for review of project deliverables and to secure
control and tenure, prior to approving the project to move forward with a preliminary design phase. This project
type change and scope was recommended by and approved by RCO Director in person, on 8/18/2016.
Agreement Terms
In all other respects the Agreement, to which this is an Amendment, and attachments thereto, shall
remain in full force and effect. In witness whereof the parties hereto have executed this Amendment.
State Of Washington
Recreation and Conservation Office
.I
BY:
Kaleen Cottinq
TITLE: Director
DATE: 4, �1-o'
M
Pre -approved as to form:
/S/
Assistant Attorney General
City of Edmonds
AGENCY:
BY:
TITLE:
DATE:
Please sign and return to:
Recreation and Conservation Office
PO Box 40917
Olympia, WA 98504-0917
SAL Project Project Type Change Amendment
General Fund - Federal
AMENAGRIRPT
RC
Packet Pg. 55
4.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Authorization for Mayor to Sign Supplemental Agreement with Shannon & Wilson for the Willow Creek
Daylighting Project
Staff Lead: Carrie Hite
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On March 18, 2014, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with
Shannon & Wilson to complete the final feasibility study for the Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds
Marsh restoration project.
On February 3, 2015, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Shannon &
Wilson for the final feasibility study of the Willow Creek Daylight Project to for perform additional work
for the Edmonds Marsh restoration project.
On October 18, 2016, staff presented this item to Council and it was forwarded to the October 25th
consent agenda for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement.
Narrative
The City has an existing grant agreement with RCO (#14-1299) to move the Willow Creek daylighting
project toward design that went into effect in December 2014. The City was able to use remaining grant
funding from previous RCO grants through 2015 and is now ready to begin work on the 14-1299 grant
agreement. Staff recommends approval of the supplement to allow Shannon & Wilson to proceed with
the next phase of design work.
The fee to complete the services outlined in the Supplement Agreement is $181,706. The RCO grant 14-
1299 ($157,331) and local match ($36,160) will fund the supplemental services. The remaining balance
of grant and local match will fund staff time spent on the project.
Proposed Scope of Work for Shannon & Wilson contract:
Task 1: Project Administration
Project Administration includes time for Consultant to manage this project to meet all deliverables in a
timely and affective manner. Activities includes invoicing, preparation and submittal of progress and
final reports, contract compliance, coordination of sub -contractors, and general project
communications.
Packet Pg. 96
4.4
Deliverables: Progress and Final Reports
Task 2: Expanded Marsh Restoration Alternative conceptual design
The Expanded Marsh Restoration Alternative will provide a conceptual design of an alternative channel
across the Unocal property. This task includes a conceptual drawing, description, grading plan, cost
estimates, and calculations of habitat area increases compared to the base alternatives. This task also
includes hydraulic modeling of the Expanded Marsh Restoration Alternative and the entire daylight
channel through BNSF ROW and across Marina Beach Park. This modeling will provide depth, velocity,
and inundation information, a fish habitat summary of the alternative using the hydraulic modeling
results, and up to three alternative grading plans and model geometric plans to evaluate complex,
composite channel with riparian and marsh vegetation, large woody debris and internal channel
sinuosity along the daylight channel reach between the BNSF railroad bridge and Edmonds Marsh.
Deliverables: Conceptual Design Report
Task 3: Sediment and Stormwater sampling and reporting
Sediment quality will be tested at up to seven locations: Willow Creek tributary upstream from the
Edmonds Marsh near the hatchery; Shellabarger Creek tributary upstream from the SR-104 crossing and
Edmonds Marsh; Three tidal channel excavation areas in Edmonds Marsh along the Willow Creek,
Shellabarger Creek and Harbor Square Outfall future tidal channel locations; Lower Willow Creek
existing daylight channel between the BNSF and Unocal property; Marina Beach Park shoreline.
Laboratory analysis will be performed for the following constituents: Grain size, Chlorophyll a, Benthic
Macroinvertebrates and Periphyton, Ammonia, Nitrate -Nitrite, Total Sulfides, Volatile Organic
Compounds, Semi -volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs including Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons),Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Herbicide/Pesticides, Tetrabutyltin,
Metals (Priority Pollutant Metals), Total Phosphorous, Total Organic Carbon, PCBs and Organochlorine
Pesticides.
Stormwater sampling will include four quarterly sampling events for water quality at the tributary, lower
daylight channel and marine beach areas. The fall event will be a first flush sampling event following a
rainstorm. Sampling will be at the tributary, lower daylight channel and marine beach areas. Sampling
will test for temperature, D.O., pH, Turbidity, Conductivity, Total Suspended Solids, Total Phosphorus,
Total Persulphate Nitrogen, Chloride, Hardness, Metals (Priority Pollutant Metals), Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons, Herbicide/Pesticides, Fecal Coliform.
Deliverables: Draft and Final Stormwater and Sediment Quality Monitoring Reports and
Recommendations
Task 4: Outreach meetings
The Consultant will attend the following outreach and coordination meetings with the City with
adjacent property owners. Meetings will include City internal coordination meetings, BNSF Outreach
Meeting, WSDOT Ferries Outreach Meeting, Ecology and Chevron/Unocal Outreach Meeting
Task 5: Hydraulic Modeling and Analysis
Upon completion of the feasibility study (Proj # 13-1107), several hydraulic modeling tasks remained for
the project. These hydraulic modeling tasks will be performed to inform the preliminary
design, including the following:
Daylight Channel Habitat Complexity - Develop up to three alternative grading plans
Packet Pg. 97
4.4
and model geometric plans to evaluate complex, composite channel with riparian and marsh
vegetation, large woody debris and internal channel sinuosity along the daylight channel reach
between the BNSF railroad bridge and Edmonds Marsh (see conceptual design map included in
this grant packet for reference locations).
Floodgate Operations - The project will install a floodgate near the existing stormwater pipe
connection beneath the BNSF railroad and Admiral Way. The hydraulic modeling analysis will
include rough grading plans for a protective berm tying to the BNSF railroad ROW, and the
Unocal property. The floodgate operations conditions will be evaluated for fish habitat
conditions.
Marina Beach Park - Public safety at Marina Beach Park is of concern. The hydraulics analysis
will evaluate up to three geometric alternatives that vary the tidal channel profile elevations and
channel cross section geometry. The Marina Beach Park conditions will be evaluated for depth
and velocity and human safety conditions.
Deliverables: Schematic plans of floodgate, berm rough grading plans, Admiral Way stormwater pipe
modifications, and daylight channel reconfiguration preliminary grading plans and details. Draft and
Final Hydraulics Report.
Packet Pg. 98
Original Contract No.
Supplemental Agreement 2 No.
CITY OF EDMONDS DAVE EARLING
1215T"AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA98020 - 425-771-0220 - FAX425-672-5750 MAYOR
Website: www.edmondswa.gov
0 igg° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Project
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and
Shannon & Wilson, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", entered into an underlying
agreement for design, engineering and consulting services with respect to a project known as
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration project, dated March 26, 2014; and
WHEREAS, additional work has been identified for the final feasibility study of the
Willow Creek Daylight project, to perform additional work for the Edmonds Marsh project,
and to reduce flooding at Dayton Street & SRI04; NOW, THEREFORE,
In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties
thereto as follows:
1. The underlying Agreement of March 26, 2014 between the parties, incorporated
by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the following respects:
1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement
shall be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the
stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if
herein set forth.
1.2 The $314,459 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement
and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, and which was increased by $38,160 by
the Supplemental Agreement No. 1, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed
amount of $181,706 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental
agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to
a new total not -to -exceed amount of $534,325 ($314,459, plus $38,160, plus $181,706).
1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying agreement consisting of the rate and cost
reimbursement schedule is hereby amended to include the form set forth on the attached
Exhibit A to this addendum, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
2. In all other respects, the underlying agreement between the parties shall remain in
full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein.
Packet Pg. 99
4.4.a
DONE this
CITY OF EDMONDS
Bv:
Mayor David O. Earling
day of , 20
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF )
SHANNON & WILSON, INC.
By: _
Title:
On this day of , 20 , before me, the under -signed, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared , to me known to be the of
the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to
be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the
seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
Packet Pg. 100
4.4.a
SCOPE OF SERVICES
(Revised Oct. 4, 2016)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SHANNON MLSQN, INC.
Page
BACKGROUND INFORMATION................................................................................................ I
SCOPEOF SERVICES...................................................................................................................1
Task1 Project Administration........................................................................................................I
Task 2 Expanded Marsh Alternative Conceptual Design and Modeling........................................2
Task 3 Sediment and Stormwater Sampling and Reporting...........................................................3
Task 3.1 Sediment Quality Field Sampling and Laboratory Testing..............................................3
Task 3.2 Water Quality Field Sampling and Laboratory Testing...................................................4
Task 3.3 Water and Sediment Quality Reporting...........................................................................5
Task4.0: Outreach Meetings..........................................................................................................5
Task 5.0 Hydraulic Modeling - Daylight Channel, Floodgate and Marina Beach Park.................6
Packet Pg. 101
4.4.a
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Willow Creek Daylight Project has completed a feasibility study for the daylight of Willow
Creek from Edmonds Marsh through Marina Beach Park both owned by the City of Edmonds
(City). Upon completion of the feasibility study, the project established a preferred daylight
alignment through the Marina Beach Park, along the Union Oil Company of California (Unocal)
Property, adjacent to the BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) right-of-way (ROW). The alignment
of the daylight channel and key project components, such as BNSF railroad bridge crossing,
floodgates, and upstream tidal channel connections have been accepted and are moving forward
into preliminary design associated with this scope of services.
The preliminary design will include typical channel cross sections of bioengineered channel
design with protective geotextile liner, as well as tidal channel connections to the marsh and
upstream culverts and tributaries. Civil and structure designs will include preliminary design of
the flood gate structure, BNSF railroad bridge abutments and identification of temporary shoring
systems, and the retaining wall near the BNSF bridge and steep hillslope near Marina Beach
Park.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The preliminary design scope of services is described below.
Task 1 Project Administration
The Consultant will provide project management including organization and management of the
services described in this scope, including the following tasks:
■ Schedule
■ Invoicing
■ Progress Reports
■ General Communications
■ Contract Compliance
■ Coordination of sub -consultants and team members
Deliverables
Project schedule.
Monthly progress reports and invoices.
21-2-62139-001-L1-Scope of Services_REV5.docx
21-2-62139-001
Packet Pg. 102
4.4.a
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC.
Assumptions
■ The contract period of performance is twelve months: October 2016 through October
2017.
Task 2 Expanded Marsh Alternative Conceptual Design and Modeling
The current hydraulic modeling alternatives analysis recognizes lateral constraints of the BNSF
Railway, and the proposed WSDOT Ferries Edmonds Crossing project to be implemented at
some unknown time in the future. There is interest by the City and salmon granting agencies to
evaluate a larger habitat restoration alternative that expands the daylight channel, tidal marsh,
floodplain and riparian areas beyond the daylight channel limits, into the proposed WSDOT
Edmonds Crossing parking areas. The following tasks will be performed in support of the
Expanded Marsh Restoration Habitat and Hydraulic Modeling for the Willow Creek Daylight
project alternative.
■ Develop a conceptual restoration plan with input from the City Public Works and
Parks Department, and the project team hydraulic engineer, wetland scientist and fish
biologist.
■ Develop an alternative description, grading plan, cost estimates, and calculations of
habitat area increases compared to the base alternatives described in the Feasibility
Study.
■ Perform hydraulic modeling of the Expanded Marsh Restoration Alternative and
provide depth, velocity, inundation information.
■ Provide a fish habitat summary of the Expanded Marsh Restoration Alternatives
using the hydraulic modeling results.
Using the concept design plans and hydraulic modeling data described above with data from the
original Feasibility Study Report, develop in a Conceptual Design Report comparing the two
alternatives. The report will be submitted to the City of Edmonds, and shared with project
stakeholders and property owners such as WSDOT and discussed as part of Task 4.0 Outreach
Meetings.
Deliverables
■ Draft Expanded Conceptual Restoration Design and Modeling Report (To be updated
as part of Draft and Final Hydraulic Modeling Report).
Assumptions
■ Hydraulic modeling will utilize existing models and hydrology from previous studies.
21-2-62139-001-LI-Scope of Services_REV5.docx 21-2-62139-001
2
Packet Pg. 103
4.4.a
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC.
Task 3 Sediment and Stormwater Sampling and Reporting
The City is currently under an Ecology Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, and is executing a
series of programs to improve stormwater quality in its drainage basins. Within the Phase II
Municipal Stormwater Permit, there are a range of requirements for stormwater monitoring, with
implementation of monitoring programs designated as the responsibility of the City (permittee).
To date an integrated stormwater and sediment quality sampling program has not been developed
for the Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek and Marina Beach Park drainage basin. The following
scope of services attempts to meet the requirements of the Phase II Stormwater and Sediment
Quality Monitoring guidelines. The sampling frequencies in this scope of services reflect those
outlined in the stormwater and sediment monitoring guidelines and QAPPs.
Neither the Upper Willow nor Shellabarger Creek drainage basin contains significant industrial
development, with the exception of the Unocal property at the downstream end of the marsh.
Stormwater pollutants that may enter upstream from the Marsh are likely the typical ones found
in urban and roadway runoff and residential development (e.g., petroleum products, heavy
metals, bacteria and fecal coliform, nutrients, waste, and suspended sediments). Pollutants that
may enter the marsh from adjacent BNSF Railway and Unocal property petroleum operations are
similar, but more likely petroleum based products.
Recently, questions have been posed by granting agencies regarding the water and sediment
quality within the proposed Willow Creek Daylight project. The following tasks include the
scope of services outlines sediment and "storm" water quality sampling to be performed in
support of the Willow Creek Daylight, and indirectly the Marina Beach Park Master Plan and
Renovation project. The CONSULTANT will perform environmental sampling of stormwater
and sediment within the Edmonds Marsh and the associated reporting.
Task 3.1 Sediment Quality Field Sampling and Laboratory Testing
Perform sampling at up to seven sampling locations will be in the following general locations
■ Willow Creek tributary upstream from the Edmonds Marsh near the hatchery.
■ Shellabarger Creek tributary upstream from the SR-104 crossing and Edmonds
Marsh.
■ Three tidal channel excavation areas in Edmonds Marsh along the Willow Creek,
Shellabarger Creek and Harbor Square Outfall future tidal channel locations.
■ Lower Willow Creek existing daylight channel between the BNSF and Unocal
property.
■ Marina Beach Park shoreline.
21-2-62139-001-L1-Scope of Services_REV5.docx
21-2-62139-001
Packet Pg. 104
4.4.a
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC.
The project will utilize existing water and sediment quality monitoring — Quality Assurance
Project Plans and procedures including:
WDOE, 2011 (DRAFT) Status and Trends Stormwater Monitoring and Assessment
Strategy for Small Streams, An Addendum to Quality Assurance Monitoring Plan.
WDOE, 2010 Quality Assurance Monitoring Plan Ambient Biological Monitoring in
Rivers and Streams: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Periphyton.
Sediment quality sampling and laboratory analysis will include:
■ One sampling event for sediment quality.
Seven locations for sediment quality. At four of the sampling locations, samples will
be collected at 0.5 feet below the ground surface. At the three tidal channel
excavation sampling locations, samples collected at 2 feet, and a composite sample
from 4 feet and 6 feet below ground surface (bgs). Ten sediment samples total.
Perform laboratory analysis for the following constituents:
■ Grain size,
■ Chlorophyll a,
■ Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Periphyton,
■ Ammonia,
■ Nitrate -Nitrite,
■ Total Sulfides,
■ Volatile Organic Compounds,
■ Semi -volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs including Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons),
■ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons,
■ Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
■ Herbicide/Pesticides
■ Tetrabutyltin,
■ Metals (Priority Pollutant Metals),
■ Total Phosphorous,
■ Total Organic Carbon,
■ PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides.
Task 3.2 Water Quality Field Sampling and Laboratory Testing
Perform sampling at up to seven sampling locations will be in the following general locations:
■ Sampling will be at the tributary, lower daylight channel and marine beach areas, and
not in the proposed tidal channel excavation areas.
Water quality sampling and laboratory analysis will include:
■ Four quarterly sampling events for water quality. The fall event will be a first flush
sampling event following a rainstorm.
Perform laboratory analysis or document field measurements of the following constituents:
■ Temperature
21-2-62139-001-LI-Scope of Services_REV5.docx 21-2-62139-001
4
Packet Pg. 105
4.4.a
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC.
■ D.O.
■ pH
■ Turbidity
■ Conductivity
■ Total Suspended Solids
■ Total Phosphorus
■ Total Persulphate Nitrogen
■ Chloride
■ Hardness
■ Metals (Priority Pollutant Metals)
■ Fecal Coliform
Task 3.3 Water and Sediment Quality Reporting
The CONSULTANT will provide Stormwater and Sediment Quality Monitoring Report to the
City of Edmonds.
Deliverables:
■ Draft and Final Stormwater and Sediment Quality Monitoring Report to the City of
Edmonds
Assumptions:
■ No Sampling and Analysis Plan will be developed.
■ No duplicate sampling will be performed.
■ No Investigation -derived waste (IDW) will be generated.
■ PBDEs or Hormone Disrupting Chemicals laboratory analyses are not included.
Task 4: Outreach Meetings
The Consultant will attend the following outreach and coordination meetings with the City with
adjacent property owners.
■ City internal coordination meetings (three meetings)
■ BNSF Outreach Meeting
■ WSDOT Ferries Outreach Meeting
■ Ecology and Chevron/Unocal Outreach Meeting
Deliverables
■ Power point presentations, graphics, agenda and meeting notes for each of the
meetings.
Assumptions
■ City will schedule and coordinate each of the meetings.
■ Meetings will be held at the City facilities.
21-2-62139-001-L1-Scope of Services_REV5.docx
5
21-2-62139-001
Packet Pg. 106
4.4.a
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC.
Task 5.0 Hydraulic Modeling - Daylight Channel, Floodgate and Marina Beach Park
Upon completion of the feasibility study, several hydraulic modeling tasks remained for the
project. These hydraulic modeling tasks will be performed to inform the study preliminary
design, including the following:
Daylight Channel Habitat Complexity — Develop up to three alternative grading plans
and model geometric plans to evaluate complex, composite channel with riparian and
marsh vegetation, large woody debris and internal channel sinuosity along the
daylight channel reach between the BNSF railroad bridge and Edmonds Marsh. The
modeling will focus on daily tidal exchanges with spring inflows to replicate late
spring and early summer juvenile chinook migration periods. The daylight channel
fish habitat conditions (depth, velocity, and cover) will be reviewed for each of
alternatives.
Floodgate Operations — The project will install a floodgate near the existing
stormwater pipe connection beneath the BNSF railroad and Admiral Way. The
hydraulic modeling analysis will include rough grading plans for a protective berm
tying to the BNSF railroad ROW, and the Unocal property. The floodgate operations
conditions will be evaluated for fish habitat conditions. The hydraulics analysis will:
— Identify the target design elevation for the protective berm and include the berm
in the hydraulic model.
— Evaluate up to three tailwater conditions each, for the 10-, 50-, and 100-year
flood runoff conditions (nine total).
— Evaluate floodgate operating closure conditions.
— Evaluate the effects of the Dayton Street Pump Station on the daylight project
using a station flow rating curve discharging into the Shellabarger Creek storage
pond.
■ Marina Beach Park — Public safety at Marina Beach Park is of concern. The
hydraulics analysis will evaluate up to three geometric alternatives that vary the tidal
channel profile elevations and channel cross section geometry. The Marina Beach
Park conditions will be evaluated for depth and velocity and human safety conditions.
Revised conceptual plans, hydraulic modeling analyses, combined with water and sediment
quality information, and information regarding fish habitat and buffer improvements will be used
to inform the City of potential benefits, as well as communicate with adjacent property owners
and granting agencies regarding the benefits and outcomes of both the current feasibility
preferred alternative and the potentially expanded alternative described above. The expanded
hydraulic modeling effort will use HEC-RAS21) to graphically visualize tidal channel habitat
functions and flood conditions and processes, and the modified conceptual plan layout will
provide information on riparian buffer and railroad offset conditions.
21-2-62139-001-L1-Scope of Services_REV5.docx
IN
21-2-62139-001
Packet Pg. 107
4.4.a
SHANNON 6WILSON, INC.
Deliverables
■ Draft and Final Willow Creek Daylight Hydraulics Report.
Assumptions
■ Prior to starting Task 5.0 the City will provide a MOU with WSDOT identifying the
preferred daylight alternative.
■ Hydraulic modeling will utilize existing models and hydrology from previous studies.
■ The Dayton Street Pump Station modeling project will provide updated flood flow
information for the floodgate operating scenarios described above.
■ Climate change modeling scenarios are not included in the analysis.
21-2-62139-001-L1-Scope of Services_REV5.docx
7
r
N
21-2-62139-001
Packet Pg. 108
TABLE 1
4.4.a
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
FY-2016-2017, CONTRACT (RCO 14-1299)
Design Phase
Total
Tasks
Description
1.0
Project Management
$13,121
2.0
Hydraulic Modeling of Expanded Restoration Alternative
$521520
3.0
Sediment and Water Quality Sampling
3.1
Sediment Quality Sampling
$37,105
3.2
Water Quality Sampling
$181490
3.3
Reporting
$131800
4.0
Outreach Meetings
$13,050
5.0
Hydraulic Modeling - Daylight Channel, Floodgate, Marina Beach Park
$331620
Subtotal
$181,706
21-2-62139-001-L1 T1-T3 REVS
— — Packet Pg. 109
TABLE 2
DETAILED COST ESTIMATE
4.4.a
Design Phase
Labor
Ex enses
Total
VP
$225.00
Sr. Prof. III
$150.00
Sr. Prof. I
$120.00
Prof. Ill Sr.
Tech
$100.00
Sr. Adman
$100.00
Hour Total
S&W Labor
S&W Expenses
Confluence
Tasks
Description
1.0
Project Management
52
14
66
$13,100
$21
$13,121
2.0
Hydraulic Modeling of Expanded Restoration Alternative
32
48
2201
48
14
362
1 $47,000
$520
$5,000
$52,520
3.0
Sediment and Water Quality Sampling
3.1
ISediment Quality Sampling
4
8
50
16
2
80
$9,900
$27,205
$37,105
3.2
Water Quality Sampling
4
8
50
16
1
79
$9,800
$8,690
$18,490
3.3
Reporting
4
8
48
4
64
$8,260
$540
$5,000
$13,800
4.0
Outreach Meetings
40
8
20
2
70
$12,800
$250
$13,050
5.0
Hydraulic Modeling - Daylight Channel, Floodgate, Marina Beach Park
32
48
120
16
2
218
$30,600
S520
$2,500
$33,620
Subtotal
168
128
508
91,
39
721
$131,460
$37,746
$12,500
$181,706
21-2-62139-001-L1 T1-T3 REV5
Packet P9, 110
TABLE3
EXPENSES
1
NameW
Admin
Descri Hon I
Reproduction - B&W and Color reports, maps, etc.
Unit
LS
Amount
1
Unit Price
$21.00
Total
$21
2
Hydraulic Modeling of Expanded Restoration Alt.
Reproduction - B&W and Color reports, maps, etc.
LS
2
$260.00
$520
3.1
Travel - Sediment
Seattle to Edmonds
MI
40
$0.54
$22
3.1
Field Equipment
Miscellaneous Field Equipment
EA
1
$204.00
$204
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Sediment Grain Size (ASTM D6913)
EA
10
$135.00
$1,350
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Ammonia (SM 4500 NH3 D,F)
EA
10
$20.00
$200
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Nitrate -Nitrite (EPA 300.0)
EA
10
$35.00
$350
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Total Sulfides (SM 4500 S2, F)
EA
10
$30.00
$300
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
VOCs (EPA 8260C/624)
EA
10
$145.00
$1,450
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
SVOCs and PAHs (EPA 8270D/625)
EA
10
$325.00
$3,250
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
TPH (VPH + EPH, NWVPH & EPA 8021B, NWEPH)
EA
10
$400.00
$4,000
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
SVOCs and PAHs (EPA 8270D/625)
EA
10
$325.00
$3,250
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides (EPA 8081/8082)
EA
10
$150.00
$1,500
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Tetrabutlytin
EA
10
$300.00
$3,000
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Metals (Priority Pollutants EPA 6020/200.8/CVAA)
EA
10
$155.00
$1,550
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Total Phosphorus (EPA 365.3)
EA
10
$35.00
$350
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
TOC (SM 5310B,C / EPA 9060A)
EA
10
$40.00
$400
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides (EPA 8081/8082)
EA
10
$150.00
$1,500
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Benthic Macroinvertebrates Shipping
EA
1
$250.00
$250
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Macroinvertebrates and Chlorophyll a
EA
7
$300.00
$2,100
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Periphyton
EA
7
$300.00
$2,100
3.1
Sediment Quality Samples
Reproduction - B&W and Color reports, maps, etc.
LS
1
$79.00
$79
3.2
Travel -WQ
Seattle to Edmonds
MI
120
$0.54
$65
3.2
Multiprobe (Temp, pH, DO, Cond.)
Weekly
WK
4
$500.00
$2,000
3.2
Water Quality Samples
Total Suspended Solids
EA
20
$20.00
$400
3.2
Water Quality Samples
Total Phosphorus (EPA 365.3)
EA
20
$35.00
$700
3.2
Water Quality Samples
Total Persulphate Nitrogen
EA
1 20
$20.00
$400
3.2
Water Quality Samples
Chloride
EA
20
$25.00
$500
3.2
Water Quality Samples
Hardness
EA
20
$35.00
$700
3.2
Water Quality Samples
Metals (Priority Pollutants EPA 6020/200.8/CVAA))
EA
20
$155.00
$3,100
3.2
Water Quality Samples
Fecal Coliform
EA
20
$40.00
$800
3.1
Water Quality Samples
Reproduction - B&W and Color reports, maps, etc.
LS
1
$74.00
$25
3.3
Water & Sediment Sampling Reports
Reproduction - B&W and Color reports, maps, etc.
LS
2
$270.00
$540
4.0
Outreach Meetings
Mileage
MI
210
$0.54
$113
4.0
Outreach Meetings
Reproduction - Maps, Figures, Posters, Handouts
LS
1
$137.00
$137
5.0
Hydraulic Modeling - Daylight Channel, Floodgate, Marina
Beach Park
1 Reproduction - B&W and Color reports, maps, etc.
LS
2
$260.00
$520
Total
1$37,746
Notes:
B&W = black and white
LS = lump sum
MI = mile
4.4.a
C
Q
21-2-62139-001-1-1_T1-T3_REV5 Packet Pg. 111
TABLE 4
ESTIMATED SCHEDULE
4.4.a
Tasks
2.0
Descri tion
NTP
Hydraulic Modeling of Expanded Restoration Alternative
Calendar Days
0
60
Est. Date
10/15/16
12/14/16
3.1
Sediment Quality Sampling
60
12/14/16
3.2
Water Quality Sampling
60
12/14/16
3.3
Water Quality and Sediment Reporting Q4-16
60
12/14/16
4.0
Outreach Meetings
150
3/14/17
5.0
Hydraulic Modeling - Daylight Channel, Floodgate, Marina
Beach Park Draft Report
210
5/13/17
3.3
Water Quality and Sediment Reporting Q3-17
330
9/10/17
5.0
Hydraulic Modeling - Daylight Channel, Floodgate, Marina
Beach Park Final Report
330
9/10/17
0
c
m
aEi
a
a
3
c
0
3r
06
c
0
c
c
Cn
r
tV
to
r
C
d
E
d
d
L
Q
t_
c�
G
0
Q
Q
v/
0
N
06
C
O
C
C
R
t
r
C
O
E
t
v
R
Q
21-2-62139-001-L1 T1-T3 REVS
- - Packet Pg. 112
4.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Resolution of Intent to Assume the Duties of the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District and setting a
public hearing on November 15, 2016
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
On September 20, 2016, the Edmonds City Council adopted Resolution No. 1370, declaring the City
Council's intention to consider the assumption of the rights, powers, functions and obligations of the
Edmonds Transportation Benefit District, and set a public hearing date for October 4, 2016.
On October 4, 2016, the City Council held a public hearing at which all interested parties were invited to
appear and be heard. Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council determined that
the public interest and welfare would be satisfied by the City's assumption of the rights, powers,
functions and obligations of the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District and requested the City
Attorney to prepare an ordinance to effect this change.
However, staff discovered a defect in the public hearing notice procedure; the hearing was required to
be published twice, but it was only published once. Therefore, Council must pass a new resolution
establishing a new hearing date, which must be published twice in the City's newspaper of record. The
proposed hearing date is November 15, 2016, which allows the City to meet the publication
requirements.
Staff Recommendation
That City Council pass the attached resolution establishing a new hearing date of November 15, 2016 on
the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
Pursuant to Ordinance 3707, and codified in Chapter 3.65 of the Edmonds Municipal Code, the City of
Edmonds City Council established a transportation benefit district to be known as the Edmonds
Transportation Benefit District in November 2009, with geographical boundaries comprised of the
corporate limits of the City of Edmonds at the time the ordinance was adopted or as they may have
existed after future annexations. The 2015 State Legislature adopted Second Engrossed Substitute
Senate Bill (2ESSB) 5987, the majority of which became effective on July 15, 2015. Section 301 of 2ESSB
5987 authorizes any city in which a transportation benefit district has been established pursuant to
Chapter 36.73 RCW within boundaries coterminous with the boundaries of the city, to assume the
rights, powers, functions, and obligations of the TBD, by way of adoption of an ordinance or resolution
of the city legislative authority.
Packet Pg. 113
4.5.a
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER THE ASSUMPTION OF THE RIGHTS,
POWERS, FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE
EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the 2015 Legislature adopted Second Engrossed Substitute Senate
Bill (2ESSB) 5987, the majority of which became effective on July 15, 2015; and
WHEREAS, Section 301 of 2ESSB 5987 authorizes any city in which a
transportation benefit district ("TBD") has been established pursuant to Chapter 36.73
RCW within boundaries coterminous with the boundaries of the city, to assume the
rights, powers, functions, and obligations of the TBD, by way of adoption of an
ordinance or resolution of the city legislative authority; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance and codified in Chapter 3.65 of the Edmonds
Municipal Code, the City of Edmonds City Council established a transportation benefit
district to be known as the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District, with geographical
boundaries comprised of the corporate limits of the City of Edmonds at the time the
ordinance was adopted or as they may exist after future annexations; and
WHEREAS, Section 302 of 2ESSB 5987 provides that the assumption of the
rights, powers, functions, and obligations of a transportation benefit district may be
initiated by the adoption of an ordinance or resolution by the city legislative authority
indicating its intention to conduct a hearing concerning the assumption of such rights,
powers, functions, and obligations, setting a time and place at which the city legislative
authority will consider the proposed assumption of the rights, powers, functions and
I
Packet Pg. 114
4.5.a
obligations of the transportation benefit district, and stating that all persons interested
may appear and be heard; and
WHEREAS, section 302 of 2ESSB 5987 provides that the ordinance or resolution
of intention must be published at least two times during the two weeks preceding the
scheduled hearing in newspapers of daily general circulation printed or published in the
city in which the transportation benefit district is located; and
WHEREAS, Section 303 of ESSB 5987 provides that if, after receiving
testimony, the city legislative authority determines that the public interest or welfare
would be satisfied by the city assuming the rights, powers, immunities, functions, and
obligations of the TBD, the city legislative authority may declare that to be its intent and
assume such rights, powers, immunities, functions, and obligations by ordinance or
resolution, providing that the city is vested with every right, power, immunity, function
and obligation currently granted to or possessed by the TBD; and
WHEREAS, upon assumption of the rights, powers, immunities, functions, and
obligations of the TBD by the City, the governing body established by RCW 36.73.020
must be abolished; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council of Edmonds to consider the
assumption of rights, powers, functions, and obligations of the Edmonds TBD, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to set a public hearing as required by
Section 302 of 2ESSB 5987;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City of Edmonds intends to consider the assumption of the rights,
powers, functions, and obligations of the Edmonds TBD.
2
Packet Pg. 115
4.5.a
2. A public hearing concerning the assumption of the rights, powers,
functions and obligations of the Edmonds TBD shall be held on November 15, 2016.
3. All persons interested, including those with protests and objections to the
assumption of rights, powers, functions, and obligations of the TBD, may appear and be
heard at said public hearing.
4. At the conclusion of the public hearing, if the City Council determines that
the public interest or welfare would be satisfied by the City assuming the rights, powers,
immunities, functions, and obligations of the TBD, the City Council may declare that to
be its intent, and assume such rights, powers, immunities, functions and obligations by
way of ordinance or resolution, providing that the City is vested with every rights, power,
immunity, function and obligation currently granted to or possessed by the TBD.
5. The City Clerk shall give notice of the public hearing set herein in the
manner so required by Section 302 of 2ESSB 5987.
RESOLVED this 25th day of October 2016.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, DAVID O. EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: October 21, 2016
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: October 25, 2016
RESOLUTION NO.
3
Packet Pg. 116
6.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Agreement For Wastewater Treatment, Disposal and Conveyance Services (35 min.)
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Pamela Randolph
Background/History
This is the first introduction of the agreement; it has not been previously presented for City Council
review.
Staff Recommendation
This is an informational discussion at this time.
Narrative
The City entered into an original agreement with our wastewater treatment partners in 1988. The basis
of the original agreement was to allocate capacity which determined the share of capital expense each
partner would be responsible for. The agreement also determined how ongoing operations and
maintenance expenses would be allocated. The contract will expire in May of 2018.
Staff worked with our treatment plant partners, Olympic View Water and Sewer District, the City of
Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Wastewater District over the past year to develop a draft agreement.
The draft agreement removes language solely referencing the construction of a new plant, clarifies
language which was a source of past disagreements and includes concepts and issues that were not
envisioned in the original agreement.
For example;
The draft contract defines Service Area Commitments which are designed to ensure that all new
services within our respective collection systems will be conveyed and treated in Edmonds,
The draft contract defines a process in which joint use conveyance lines that need repair or have
reached capacity can be managed and paid for,
The draft contract defines a high strength discharge fee,
The draft contract expands the Pretreatment authority that the City of Edmonds has with our
Partners to ensure compliance.
Staff seeks City Council input/feedback on the draft agreement at this time to ensure it meets long term
City needs. The contract term, if approved as is, would expire December 31, 2048 to coincide with other
long term contract commitments.
Attachments:
Final Draft for CC review
Packet Pg. 117
6.1.a
I FINAL DRAFT
2 AGREEMENT FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND CONVEYANCE
3 SERVICES
5 THIS AGREEMENT is effective as of the day of , 2016, by and among the
6 City of Mountlake Terrace, Olympic View Water and Sewer District, and Ronald Wastewater
7 District (each individually, a "Participant") and the CITY OF EDMONDS (the "City")
8 (collectively, the "Parties,"), all municipal corporations of the State of Washington.
10 WHEREAS, the City's wastewater treatment and disposal facilities (the "Facilities") are being
11 operated to meet the discharge limitations of the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
12 System waste discharge permit; and
13
14 WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain the capacity of the Facilities at the 2nd Avenue and
15 Dayton Street site in order to meet current domestic wastewater treatment needs of various
16 public entities located in or near the City and to provide projected ultimate treatment capacity for
17 the City and the Participants as defined under "Allocated Capacity"; and
18
19 WHEREAS, the Participants wish the City to continue the operation and maintenance of
20 certain transmission, metering, and pumping facilities, which are used jointly by some or all of
21 the Participants and the City; and
22
23 WHEREAS, the City desires to plan and provide for the long-term capital and operational
24 needs of the Facilities, which may include mandated technological and regulatory changes and
25 increased capacity and space demands; and
26
27 WHEREAS the Participants desire to provide for a method of overseeing construction,
28 operation, maintenance, and expansion of the facilities; and to provide a procedure for reviewing
29 and commenting upon the Treatment Plant annual budgets; and
30
31 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to provide for an integrated Industrial Pretreatment program
32 within their respective service areas as required by the Department of Ecology ("DOE") and/or
33 the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"); and
34
35 WHEREAS, the Parties executed a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") in 1987 setting
36 forth a number of principles and expressing their intent to enter into an Agreement for
37 wastewater treatment, disposal and transport services; incorporated herein by reference for
38 historical context but has no further force or effect; and
39
40 WHEREAS, the Parties executed an agreement dated May 17, 1988 for constructing and
41 providing for Maintenance and Operation of joint sewer facilities (the "1988 Agreement"); and
42
43 WHEREAS, the Wastewater Treatment Plant that was proposed in the 1988 Agreement was
44 constructed and completed; and
45
- 1 -
Packet Pg. 118
6.1.a
46 WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds negotiated an agreement with King County regarding a
47 flow swap that included the area around Lake Ballinger and Richmond Beach Pump Station
48 which resulted in an agreement signed July 20, 1988, which was later superseded by an
49 agreement signed October 6, 2000 and amended in June 18, 2012; and
50
51 WHEREAS, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued for
52 operation of the plant defines exceeding plant capacity in terms of monthly average daily flows
53 (MADF) while the 1988 Agreement defines it in terms of annual average daily flows (AADF),
54 and the Parties wish to establish flow measurements and capacities in MADF for consistency
55 with the conditions and limitations in the NPDES permit; and
56
57 WHEREAS, financing, operations and regulations have changed since 1988 that give rise to
58 the need to update the 1988 Agreement; and
59
60 WHEREAS, the 1988 Agreement prohibited the capital improvement fund from debt service
61 payments for capital improvement projects and the Parties wish to establish the practice of
62 allowing the capital improvement fund to pay for capital projects through debt financing;
63
64 Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises provided for
65 herein, the Parties hereto for themselves, their assigns and successors in interest, agree as
66 follows:
67
68 Section 1- Definitions
69
70 For the purpose of this Agreement, the following words shall have the following meanings
71 unless another meaning is clearly intended:
72
73 1.1. "AADF" means annual average daily flow, and shall mean the total flow of domestic
74 sewage in millions of gallons during a full calendar year divided by the number of days in such
75 year, expressed in MGD.
76
77 1.2. "Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage" means the maximum amount of Domestic
78 Sewage that the City and each Participant is authorized by this Agreement to transmit to the
79 Facilities, measured in volume, as shown on the Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage table in
80 Exhibit A. Volume shall be measured by metered Domestic Sewage flow expressed in MGDs of
81 AADF and/or MADF, as described in Section 5.2. A substitute for direct metering is to be used
82 where co -mingled flows described in Section 6.5 make direct measurement impractical.
83
84 1.3 "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODY' (as defined in the NPDES permit) means an
85 indirect way of measuring the quantity of organic material present in an effluent that is utilized
86 by bacteria. Although BOD is not a specific compound, it is defined as a conventional pollutant
87 under the Federal Clean Water Act.
88
89 1.4 "Capital Projects" means capital improvements, major replacements or major repairs that
90 are not included within regular Operations and Maintenance costs.
91
- 2 -
Packet Pg. 119
6.1.a
92 1.5 "Capital Project Costs" means: (1) the cost of preparing the planning studies and
93 engineering plans and specifications for the capital improvements; (2) the amounts paid to
94 contractors for work performed under contracts for construction, installation and inspection of
95 the capital improvements; (3) the recorded pay and expenses of employees of the City directly
96 related to the design, construction, installation and inspection of the capital improvements, but
97 not including any general City overhead; (4) the cost of materials, equipment and supplies
98 directly related to the capital improvements; (5) the cost of acquiring and condemning land,
99 easements and rights -of -way for, or related to, the capital improvements; (6) the cost of legal,
100 engineering and other professional services related to the financing, planning, acquisition,
101 construction, installation and inspection of the capital improvements and to the resolving of any
102 disputes or lawsuits related thereto, provided, however, that these costs are attributed to the
103 project as a whole and not to the City's separate share; (7) the cost of obtaining necessary permits
104 and franchises and (8) other costs reasonably related to the planning, design, project
105 administration, construction management, debt service and general project management for the
106 capital improvements.
107
108 1.6. "Capacity Limit" means the maximum amount of sewage that can be discharged by the
109 City or a Participant, as shown on the Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage table in
110 Exhibit A, unless the transfer of capacities is made between or among Parties per Section 5.4.
111
112 1.7. "City„ means the City of Edmonds or its successor.
113
114 1.8. "Customer" means a "single family residence" and/or an equivalent customer unit
115 (ECU), as defined below.
116
117 1.9. "DOE" means the Washington State Department of Ecology or its successor.
118
119 1.10. "Domestic Sewage" means sanitary wastes normally collected from residential
120 establishments, and shall include commercial and industrial wastes of similar strength or quality,
121 and other commercial and/or industrial wastes that are pre-treated in accordance with City and/or
122 Participant requirements meeting DOE and EPA guidelines. Domestic Sewage shall exclude
123 ground water, storm water, drain water, and industrial wastes not pre-treated in accordance with
124 City and/Participant requirements meeting DOE and EPA guidelines.
125
126 1.11 "Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant" EWTP means the wastewater treatment
127 plant at 200 2nd Ave S., Edmonds WA.
128
129 1.12. "Edmonds Way Trunk line" means the sewer line connected to the discharge pipe
130 from King County's Ballinger Pump Station and running to the EWTP, as shown in Exhibit D.
131 The trunk line shall include: the gravity sewer line between the original Ballinger Lift Station
132 and King County's Ballinger Lift Station; the pressure main in 244th St between King County's
133 connection and continuing to the point on Highway 99 where the line changes to gravity; the
134 gravity line between Highway 99 and the point at which the sewer line enters the headworks at
135 the EWTP.
136
137 1.13. "EPA" means the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or its successor.
- 3 -
Packet Pg. 120
6.1.a
138
139 1.14. "Equivalent Customer Unit (ECU) is a unit of measure developed to ensure all Parties
140 report system utilization in a consistent manner. The ECU count is used in the yearly
141 reconciliation. One (1) ECU is assessed for either 1017 cubic feet per month of residential water
142 billed, or a private well discharging to the sewerage system or a HSD. The ECU count is further
143 described in Exhibit B.
144
145 1.15 "Extraordinary Costs" means costs over and above typical Operations and
146 Maintenance Costs. This may include additional pumping costs, costs to treat HSDs or increased
147 disposal costs.
148
149 1.16. "Facilities" means the EWTP, the Edmonds Way Trunk line, the outfall and the
150 diffuser, and the field flow meters (as defined below), all as shown in Exhibit D.
151
152 1.17 "Facilities Capital Improvement Fund (FCIF)" means a dedicated capital improvement
153 fund established and maintained by the City whose purpose is to fund capital improvements,
154 major replacements, or major repairs to the facilities.
155
156 1.18. "Field flow meters" means the flow meters and related appurtenances that are installed
157 in the Facilities or Internal System for the purpose of measuring the Parties quantity of flow as
158 necessary to administer this Agreement. The current field flow meters installed at the time of
159 this agreement are: Meter 1, Meter 2, Meter 3, Meter 4, Meter A, Meter B, Meter C, Meter D and
160 Meter E. Although the meter installed may measure the flow from one or more Parties, the
161 meters shall be considered as one of the Facilities as described in Section 1.11, since the purpose
162 of the flow meter is to determine the quantity of flow discharged by one or more Parties.
163
164 1.19. "Flow" means the volume of sewage in gallons per unit of time
165
166 1.20. "High Strength Discharger (HSD)" means a discharger in the City's or a Participant's
167 internal system that has been identified as typically having concentrations above the limits found
168 in Exhibit B.
169
170 1.21. "Influent Point" means the point at which Parties Internal System connects to the
171 Facilities.
172
173 1.22. "Internal System" means all sewer lines, pump stations, and other sewer facilities
174 upstream from the Influent Point owned and operated by any one of the Parties.
175
176 1.23. "Joint Use" is when the Internal System of any one of the Parties or outside entity is
177 used by another one of the Parties or outside entity to transport, pump or measure sewage within
178 the collection system. The Joint Use areas are described in Exhibit G and Exhibit H.
179
180 1.24. "MGD" means million gallons per day, referring to a rate of sewage flow.
181
- 4 -
Packet Pg. 121
6.1.a
182 1.25. "MADF" means the monthly average daily flow, and shall mean the total flow of
183 domestic sewage in millions of gallons (MG) during a full calendar month divided by the
184 number of days in that month, expressed in MGD.
185
186 1.26. "NPDES Permit" means a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Waste
187 Discharge Permit granted to the City.
188
189 1.27. "Operations and Maintenance Costs" (O&M Costs) means all reasonable direct costs
190 and expenses incurred by the City in causing the Facilities to be operated and maintained in good
191 repair, working order and condition, but shall not include any depreciation, taxes or charges in
192 lieu of taxes levied or imposed by the City. The term "taxes" shall not include sales tax imposed
193 pursuant to State statutes on all transactions within the City and paid on day to day operating
194 purchases. It shall also mean administering a joint Industrial Pre-treatment Program, as
195 described in Section 5.7. These costs include, but are not limited to, labor, power, light, water,
196 heat, phones, chemicals, equipment, tools, materials, supplies, minor repairs, insurance
197 premiums, engineering services, attorney services (except for legal action occurring between
198 Parties included in this Agreement), other contract services, rent and inspection.
199
200 1.28. "Overhead Costs" means the City's general administrative, supervisory and other
201 indirect costs related to the operation and maintenance of the Facilities. Overhead Costs shall be
202 a fixed twenty (20) percent of direct O&M costs.
203
204 1.29. "Oversight Committee" means the committee of that name referenced in Section 8 of
205 this Agreement.
206
207 1.30. "Participant" means Mountlake Terrace, Olympic View Water and Sewer District and
208 Ronald Wastewater District or their successors and assigns, which are each referred to
209 individually as a "Participant" and which are collectively referred to as the "Participants."
210
211 1.31. "Parties" means the City and the Participants.
212
213 1.32. "Service Area" means the service area within which the City or a Participant is
214 responsible for providing wastewater collection services, as depicted on Exhibit F.
215
216 1.33. "Service Area Commitment" means that all wastewater flows generated within a
217 Participant's Service Area as depicted on Exhibit H, are, or committed to be, conveyed and/or
218 treated by the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant.
219
220 1.34. "Significant Industrial User (SILT)" means all Industrial Users subject to Categorical
221 Pre-treatment Standards under 40 CFR 403.6 and 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N and
222 any other Industrial User that: discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of
223 process wastewater to the POTW (excluding sanitary, noncontact cooling and boiler blowdown
224 wastewater); contributes a process waste stream which makes up five (5) percent or more of the
225 average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the POTW Treatment plant or is designated
226 as such by the Control Authority on the basis that the Industrial User has a reasonable potential
- 5 -
Packet Pg. 122
6.1.a
227 for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any Pre-treatment standard or
228 requirement (in accordance with 40 CFR 403.8(f)(6)).
229
230 1.35. "Total Suspended Solids (TSS)" means the particulate material (either organic or
231 inorganic) in a body of water (or representative sample) that are suspended.
232
233 Section 2. Purpose
234
235 It is the purpose of this Agreement to assist in guiding the activities, resources and effort of the
236 Parties to provide the citizens of the Parties with efficient, high quality and well -maintained
237 wastewater treatment, transport and disposal at a reasonable cost.
238
239 Section 3. Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage
240
241 The Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage for each of the Parties is as shown in Exhibit A,
242 unless the transfer of capacities is made between or among Parties per Section 5.4.
243
244 Section 4. Upgrading or Expanding the Facilities
245
246 4.1. Required Upgrades. If the City is required by applicable laws or regulations to upgrade or
247 expand the Facilities to provide a higher level of wastewater treatment or to modify the methods
248 and/or locations of wastewater discharge, each Participant shall, if it desires to continue
249 discharging Domestic Sewage into the Facilities, pay the Participant's proportionate share, as set
250 forth in Section 3, of the cost of constructing such additional improvements, adding needed
251 equipment and/or acquiring land, whether by purchase or lease. The City and each Participant
252 shall seek opportunities to minimize or avoid the cost of additional improvements through
253 mutually agreeable modifications in the quantity and quality of Domestic Sewage discharged by
254 the Participant. In lieu of paying for its share of the cost of constructing such additional
255 improvements, any Participant may, at its discretion, discontinue discharge of Domestic Sewage
256 into the Facilities and then pay only those charges described in Section 7.3 of this Agreement for
257 the life of the Agreement or until such Participant regularly discharges more than 0.4 MGD.
258
259 4.2 Optional Upgrades. Optional upgrades are the sole responsibility of the City. Optional
260 upgrades are defined as a construction or improvement that is required to facilitate City business
261 not specifically referenced in this Agreement. Upgrades to the appearance, functionality and/or
262 serviceability of the Facilities are not considered optional.
263
264 Section 5. Sewage Treatment
265
266 5. 1. Facility Loading_. The City shall receive, transport, and treat by means of the Facilities,
267 Domestic Sewage discharged by the Parties up to the EWTP Facility Loading design and
268 Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage, subject to the current NPDES permit, applicable laws
269 and regulations. The City will provide this capacity as long as the Parties shall require it, barring
270 events and circumstances which are beyond the City's control. However, this Agreement creates
271 no obligation by the City beyond the term of this Agreement. If and when the City nears
272 eighty-five (85) percent of the MADF design for three (3) consecutive months, or is projected to
- 6 -
Packet Pg. 123
6.1.a
273 exceed such design, the Oversight Committee will meet to plan for treatment plant expansion.
274
275 5. 2. Capacity Limits. Neither the City or a Participant may discharge into the Facilities any
276 Domestic Sewage in amounts greater than its Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage.
277
278 If the City determines that in a calendar year the amount of the City's or a Participant's AADF is
279 in excess of the Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage, the City or Participant shall pay, in
280 addition to its ordinary charges described in Section 7.1, any Extraordinary Costs incurred by the
281 City to treat the excess Domestic Sewage, as well as costs related to Capital Project Costs to treat
282 and transport the Participant's excess capacity in that year.
283
284 If the City determines that the amount of the City's or a Participant's MADF is in excess of the
285 Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage in any period of three (3) or more consecutive calendar
286 months, the City or Participant shall pay, in addition to its ordinary charges described in
287 Section 7.1, any Extraordinary Costs incurred by the City to treat the excess Domestic Sewage,
288 as well as Capital Project Costs to treat and transport the excess capacity in those months.
289
290 If the Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage as measured in terms of AADF and MADF are
291 both exceeded for the City or a Participant in a calendar year, the City or Participant shall pay the
292 Extraordinary Costs and Capital Project Costs for exceeding the AADF Capacity Limit or shall
293 pay the Extraordinary Costs and related Capital Project Costs of exceeding the MADF Capacity
294 Limit, whichever is larger for that year. The Extraordinary Costs and related Capital Project
295 Costs for exceeding the AADF Capacity Limit and the MADF Capacity Limit shall not be
296 additive for a Participant in any calendar year.
297
298 Capital Project Costs for treating sewage flows beyond the Allocated Capacity of Domestic
299 Sewage limit without prior arrangements, such as described below, shall be charged according to
300 the methodologies described in Section 5.4 on Transfers of Capacity, and shall be credited to the
301 Parties based upon the difference between its Capacity Limit and its AADF or MADF. The City
302 shall account to any Participant for its additional costs.
303
304 Any additional costs collected by the City for flow received in excess of Allocated Capacity of
305 Domestic Sewage shall be credited to the total O&M cost prior to apportionment of O&M Costs
306 to the other Parties that are within their respective Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage. The
307 City's acceptance of excess amounts on any occasion or occasions shall not bind the City to
308 accept excess Domestic Sewage amounts on any other occasion.
309
310 When the AADF reaches eight -five (85) percent of the City or a Participant's annual Allocated
311 Capacity of Domestic Sewage in a calendar year, or the MADF reaches eighty-five (85) percent
312 of the monthly Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage for three (3) consecutive months, or
313 when the projected increases would reach the City or a Participant's Capacity Limit within five
314 (5) years, the City or the Participant shall notify the Oversight Committee in order to commence:
315
316 • planning for treatment of its domestic sewage beyond its Allocated Capacity of
317 Domestic Sewage (potential transfer of capacity),
318 • planning for treatment plant expansion,
- 7 -
Packet Pg. 124
6.1.a
319 • a determination by the Oversight Committee that the service area of the projected
320 increase may be better served by another entity.
321
322 5.3. Notification of Nearing Capacity Limit. When the City or a Participants flow reaches
323 eighty-five (85) percent of its AADF of Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage for a calendar
324 year or its MADF of Domestic Sewage for three (3) consecutive months, the City shall notify the
325 Participant and the Oversight Committee in writing within thirty (30) days of discovery. The
326 City or Participant shall commence the preparation of plans to use its remaining Allocated
327 Capacity and to provide for additional capacity beyond the Capacity Limit. The Participant shall
328 be responsible for providing the City with information on any anticipated development which
329 would increase flows beyond its Capacity Limit.
330
331 5.4. Transfer of Capacity. If the City or a Participant desires to discharge greater amounts of
332 Domestic Sewage into the Facilities than are allocated as set forth herein, the City or Participant
333 may request to purchase additional capacity from one or more of the Parties with unused
334 purchased capacity in the Facilities. If the City or a Participant determines that its Allocated
335 Capacity of Domestic Sewage is excessive, it may offer to sell such excess capacity to any of the
336 Parties. In no event may the total Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage of the Parties after the
337 transfer exceed the total Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage of the Parties before the
338 transfer. It is fully recognized by the City and the Participants that any transfer of capacity,
339 whether temporarily or permanently, by any of the Parties is voluntary. The willingness of the
340 City or Participant to enter into a transfer arrangement and the term of such arrangement shall
341 not be subject to review by the Oversight Committee or to arbitration. Any cost of capacity
342 transfer will be negotiated by the Parties involved. The methodology that derived the initial
343 capacity charge, Exhibit C, may be used as a basis for future negotiations.
344
345 The City shall be notified of all pending and final transfers of capacity and of all terms of such
346 transfers in writing, and shall make this information available to all Participants.
347
348 5.4.1. Cost of Capacity Transfer. The cost of transferring such capacity may be determined by
349 the Future Value method, which is based on the principle that the capacity purchaser should
350 reimburse the capacity seller for all previous payments which the seller has made for the
351 transferred capacity, and for the compounded costs of such payments, as defined by an interest
352 rate which the City or the Participant could have expected to receive by investing these
353 payments. The interest rate may be set by the capacity seller and should be consistent with
354 generally accepted public accounting principles. Exhibit C describes the methodology that would
355 be used to derive the capacity transfer price at any future year.
356
357 5.4.2. Alternative Costs of Capacity Transfer. Any two (2) Participants, or any Participant and
358 the City, may agree to different terms than those described above and in the methodology in
359 Exhibit C.
360
361 5.4.3. Temporary Capacity Transfers. Temporary capacity transfers will be permitted from
362 Parties having excess capacity to the City or Participant needing capacity on the basis of any
363 terms negotiated between the affected Parties for a period not exceeding five (5) years.
364 Participants agreeing to a temporary capacity transfer shall notify the City of the terms of their
- 8 -
Packet Pg. 125
6.1.a
365 arrangement. Terms shall include a plan for ending the temporary transfer by demonstrating
366 how permanent provisions are to be made.
367
368 5. 5. Treatment of Domestic Sewage Only. Except as provided in Section 5.6 for wastewater
369 from a HSD, Parties may not discharge any wastewater other than Domestic Sewage into the
370 Facilities without first requesting authority and being granted authority through the permitting
371 process. The City is obligated to treat only Domestic Sewage and may reject all other forms of
372 wastewater, and the City may refuse to transport and treat Domestic Sewage from those portions
373 of any Participant's sewage collection system which do not conform to DOE and/or EPA
374 standards for Domestic Sewage.
375
376 5. 6. High Strength Dischargers. While there has historically been, and continues to be, a
377 presumption that the Parties sewage flows are domestic residential flows with approximately
378 equivalent concentrations of BOD and TSS, the Parties shall identify and measure, as necessary,
379 sewer discharges within their internal system with BOD and TSS concentrations that meet the
380 definition of high strength wastewater. Those concentrations of BOD and TSS are set forth in
381 Exhibit B and may be modified based on either regulatory requirements or generally accepted
382 industry practices. The additional treatment costs for treating high strength wastewater shall be
383 directly applied to in the City or Participant whose internal system the discharge of high strength
384 wastewater originated, and, unlike general O&M costs, shall not be based on overall sewage
385 flow levels of the City and the Participant, except as specifically provided herein.
386
387 The wastewater from all HSDs shall be representatively measured to determine the strength and
388 quantity of the discharge as explained in Section 5.6.1. All Parties with an HSD to their system
389 shall be charged as noted in Section 5.6.2.
390
391 5.6.1. Highgth Dischargepling. When the City or Participant is notified or
392 suspects that there is a HSD in the system, the City shall measure the flow quantities and
393 concentration of BOD and TSS from such discharger. Since the sampling methodology and
394 frequency may vary between businesses and types of businesses, the Parties involved will jointly
395 agree upon a sampling plan for discharge analysis. In the event that an agreement cannot be
396 reached, the City will hire an outside firm to develop a sampling plan for the HSD in question.
397 Following an initial wastewater characterization and load calculation, the City will be
398 responsible for conducting ongoing measurement of the HSDs wastewater to verify the waste
399 concentrations and loading and will perform routine sampling and analysis methodology and
400 frequency in accordance with the agreed upon sampling plan. Results of the HSD testing will
401 determine the ECU count for the HSD. Costs associated with measurement, sampling and
402 analysis are considered direct costs.
403
404 Restaurants shall not be classified as HSDs with regard to Section 5.6 of this Agreement.
405
406 5.6.2. ECU Determination and Pa, ments. As part of the reconciliation of payments for
407 treatment (direct O&M Costs) each year, Parties with HSDs will supply flow quantities and
408 wastewater BOD and TSS concentrations for each HSD to the City. The City will then calculate
409 the total pounds of BOD and of TSS in excess of the levels listed in Exhibit B by each such HSD
410 and convert each weight to ECUs based on the equivalence of high strength wastewater as set
- 9 -
Packet Pg. 126
6.1.a
411 forth in Exhibit B. In the event an HSD exceeds the levels in Exhibit B for multiple parameters,
412 the higher of the two ECU values for an individual HSD shall be the ECU value for that HSD.
413 ECUs shall be calculated in fractional parts. The ECUs calculated for HSD will be added to
414 other ECUs counts to determine that Parties total flow, to be used to determine the Parties share
415 of annual O&M Costs.
416
417 5. 7. Pre -Treatment Ordinances. Parties shall maintain a Pre -Treatment ordinance (or
418 resolution as may be appropriate) that meets both City, State and/or Federal requirements in
419 regards to prohibiting discharge of waste other than Domestic Sewage into their internal system.
420 The City shall be responsible for the administration and operation of a joint pre-treatment
421 program which monitors and regulates sewer discharges that flow to the EWTP. Administration
422 and operation shall include, but not be limited to, developing procedures, forms and instructions;
423 categorizing dischargers; records keeping; compliance tracking; establishment of annual limits;
424 field sampling; testing and monitoring; communication with commercial and industrial
425 dischargers; preparation of control documents; enforcement and compliance and preparation of
426 permits. All City costs incurred from the administration and operation of a pre-treatment
427 program shall be included in the direct costs of O&M of the treatment plant. The City shall be
428 responsible for costs relating to identification and sampling of dischargers, issuance of control
429 documents, and issuance of permits up to a SIU, enforcement of compliance and collection of
430 any special fees, penalties or other associated Extraordinary Costs.
431
432 5.7.2. Significant Industrial Users. In the event that an individual discharger within the
433 service area requires permit authority beyond the City's ability to issue, the DOE will solely be
434 responsible for permit review and issuance. The discharger will be responsible for all fees
435 assessed either through the permitting process, Extraordinary Costs or compliance sampling.
436
437 Section 6. Operation, Treatment, Quality of the Facilities and the Parties Internal Systems
438
439 6. 1. Operation and Maintenance of the Facilities. The City shall own and shall be responsible
440 for the operation and maintenance of the Facilities subject to the terms of this Agreement. The
441 Facilities shall be operated and maintained in accordance with high engineering standards and
442 the standards established by the EPA, the DOE and other federal, state and local agencies with
443 jurisdiction. The quantity of Domestic Sewage discharged by Parties into the Facilities shall be
444 metered at the Influent Point, with the exception of co -mingled flows, which will be accounted
445 for by other generally accepted methods using either ECUs, directly measured flows or other
446 methods approved by the Oversight Committee. The Field flow meter that measures the Parties
447 discharge of Domestic Sewage into the Facilities shall be calibrated by the City at least once
448 each calendar year in the presence of any Participant that so desires and may be inspected by any
449 Participant at the expense of such Participant at any time upon reasonable notice to the other.
450 The City will continue to monitor other relevant variables such as water consumption by the
451 Parties, rainfall, flow variations and other suitable variables which will be used to provide
452 redundancy for failed meters.
453
454 6. 2. Reporting Requirements. Parties will supply accurate and timely reports required in
455 support of this Agreement and in order to meet all regulatory requirements.
456
- 10 -
Packet Pg. 127
6.1.a
457 6.2.1 On or before April 1 of each year, each Participant shall provide the City with:
458 annual water consumption reports (for the months of January, February, March, April, November
459 and December from the prior year, the total number of customers connected to the sewer system
460 utilizing a private well and HSD flows and concentrations in a given zone. Exhibit E depicts the
461 various sewer zones.
462
463 6.2.2 The City shall daily read and record the amount of Domestic Sewage, measured in
464 MGD, discharged into the EWTP. The City shall quarterly estimate the Domestic Sewage,
465 measured in MGD, discharged into the facilities by the City and Participants. The City will
466 notify each Participant if and when eighty-five (85) percent of its Capacity Limit has been
467 reached and each month that the eighty-five (85) percent Capacity Limit is exceeded.
468
469 6.2.3 Each Participant who has been notified that it has reached eighty-five (85) percent of
470 its allocated capacity shall at least once every calendar quarter thereafter advise the City in
471 writing of any governmental or private actions that will affect the volume and quality of such
472 Participant's Domestic Sewage flow, including but not limited to, the issuance of building
473 permits, sewer permits, water permits, plat approvals, the adoption of land use and zoning
474 ordinances or amendments thereto and the execution of developer extension contracts. A
475 Participant who has been notified that it has reached eighty-five (85) percent of their capacity
476 shall report quarterly their efforts to either; reduce usage or negotiate capacity from the City or
477 another Participant; refer to Sections 5.2 — 5.4.
478
479 6.2.4 If the City reaches eighty-five (85) percent of either of its Capacity Limits, the City
480 shall at least once every calendar quarter thereafter advise the Participants in writing of any
481 governmental or private actions that will affect the volume and quality of the City's Domestic
482 Sewage flow, including, but not limited to, the issuance of building permits, sewer permits, water
483 permits, plat approvals, the adoption of land use and zoning ordinances or amendments thereto,
484 and the execution of developer extension contracts.
485
486 6. 3. Internal Systems. The City and Participants shall operate and maintain its Internal
487 System at its sole expense, including all of its facilities as required to maintain the volume and
488 quality of Domestic Sewage within the limits set forth in this Agreement. The Parties shall
489 observe the American Public Works Association (APWA) (or an agreed equivalent) standards
490 and practices in the construction, operation and maintenance of its Internal System with
491 particular attention to the following: (a) minimizing entry into the sewerage system of
492 groundwater and/or surface water (I/I - infiltration and inflow); (b) maintaining a favorable
493 character and quality of Domestic Sewage in accordance with the standards set forth in
494 Section 5.6; (c) eliminating septicity and objectionable odors, entry of petroleum wastes or other
495 chemicals and/or wastes detrimental to sewer lines, pumping stations, the Facilities and the
496 waters of Puget Sound and (d) maintaining an efficient and economical utility operation while
497 achieving optimum pollution and environmental control. The City and Participants shall prevent,
498 except for unusual circumstances to be reviewed and recommended by the Oversight Committee,
499 the connection of any storm or drainage facilities to its Internal System.
500
501 The City and Participants shall periodically inspect its Internal System to ensure adherence to
502 applicable standards and to minimize infiltration, exfiltration and deposits of rock or other
Packet Pg. 128
6.1.a
503 debris. The City or Participants, at any reasonable time and upon reasonable notice, may inspect
504 any Internal System and/or the Facilities of the City or any Participant.
505
506 The City shall give written notice to all Participants of any condition within any Participant's
507 Internal System that violates this Agreement or applicable laws, regulations or permits. If the
508 Participant does not correct such condition within a reasonable time after receiving written notice
509 thereof, the Participant shall pay any reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred in
510 connection with such condition. If the Participant discharges into the Facilities any solids,
511 liquids, gases, toxic substances or other substances which could reasonably be determined to
512 cause damage to the Facilities, or is creating a public nuisance or a hazard to life or property, the
513 Participant shall either immediately discontinue the discharge of such substances or pay for the
514 costs of modifying the Facilities so that they are capable of satisfactorily handling such
515 substances. Because substandard conditions of Domestic Sewage may cause serious damage to
516 the Facilities, the Participant shall cooperate with any City determination regarding the
517 composition of Domestic Sewage and, after compliance, may thereafter cause to be arbitrated the
518 reasonableness of that order in accordance with Section 10.
519
520 The City shall report to the Participants any condition within the City's Internal System that
521 violates this Agreement or applicable laws, regulations or permits. If the City does not correct
522 such condition within a reasonable time after discovering the condition, the City shall pay any
523 reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred in connection with such condition. If the
524 City discharges into the Facilities any solids, liquids, gases, toxic substances or other substances
525 which could reasonably be determined to cause damage to the Facilities, or is creating a public
526 nuisance or a hazard to life or property, the City shall either immediately discontinue the
527 discharge of such substances or pay for the costs of modifying the Facilities so that they are
528 capable of satisfactorily handling such substances. Because substandard conditions of Domestic
529 Sewage may cause serious damage to the Facilities, the City shall cooperate with any
530 determination by the Participants regarding the composition of Domestic Sewage and, after
531 compliance, may thereafter cause to be arbitrated the reasonableness of that order in accordance
532 with Section 10.
533
534 The Parties shall cooperate with each other to determine the source of possible violations of
535 applicable law, regulations, and permits (including applicable NPDES permits). In the event the
536 City is fined or otherwise penalized by local, State, or Federal agencies for failure to operate or
537 maintain the Facilities in accordance with the requirements of the regulatory agencies, and it is
538 demonstrated that such failure is due in whole or in part to the City or Participant's discharge of
539 Domestic Sewage in violation of this Agreement, then the City or Participant shall pay its
540 allocable share (as determined by the Parties or by an arbitrator in accordance with Section 10)
541 of the costs of such fines or penalties. If the City is fined due to a Participant's discharge, then
542 the responsible Participant shall pay its share of the associated administrative, legal and
543 engineering costs incurred by the City in connection with the fines or penalties (as determined by
544 the Parties or by an arbitrator in accordance with Section 10).
545
546 6. 4. Joint Use of Collection Systems. It is recognized by the Parties that as a practical means
547 of transporting sewage, the City or a Participant, upon agreement, may discharge sewage into a
- 12 -
Packet Pg. 129
6.1.a
548 collection and transmission system which is part of the Internal System of another. The joint use
549 facilities are shown on the Service Area maps in Exhibit G and Exhibit H.
550
551 The joint usage of such Internal Systems shall be agreed to by all Parties affected. Every effort
552 will be made to ensure that each Parties' volume of flow that is routed through a joint use area is
553 accurately accounted for. The Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage is based on a volume of
554 flow and not necessarily the conveyance route.
555
556 6.4.1 While the Internal Systems are the individual responsibility of the respective owner (City
557 or Participant) to maintain, O&M Costs may be shared on a proportional basis. Proportional
558 shares will determined by the meters, ECU count and water usage within the joint use area. The
559 owner agrees to notify all other users of its Internal System (if possible) prior to major
560 rehabilitation work in order to better understand costs, coordinate flow and to ensure adequate
561 capacity for future use.
562
563 6.4.2 If the City or a Participant determines that a collection line or portion of the transmission
564 system in a joint use area must be replaced and/or increased in size to meet future growth or to
565 reroute flows, the owner will coordinate with all affected Parties to evaluate flows, capacity
566 requirements and approach. All affected Parties agree to pay a proportional share based on the
567 capacity needs. The owner is responsible for determining the ultimate approach and cost
568 allocation.
569
570 6.5. Joint Use of Collection System Owned by Other Entities: It is recognized by the Parties
571 that flows maybe transferred, pumped or redirected, as needed, to maintain the integrity of the
572 system during maintenance or high flow periods. Invoices presented to the City for pumping
573 and/or treatment (both O&M Costs and/or Capital Project Costs) by any other entity will be
574 shared based on flow and ECU count, between the Parties.
575
576 Section 7. Payment for Operation, Maintenance and Overhead Costs for the Treatment of
577 Domestic Sewage
578
579 7. 1. Monthly Payments. Each Participant shall make monthly payments to the City for the
580 transportation and treatment of each Participant's Domestic Sewage. The monthly payments shall
581 consist of one -twelfth (1/12) of the Participant's proportionate share of the O&M Costs adopted
582 in the annual budget of the City for the Facilities. Each Participant's percentage share of the total
583 annual O&M Costs shall be determined by dividing the AADF of the Participant for the calendar
584 year preceding the budget year by the sum of the AADF of all agencies sending flow to the plant
585 for the calendar year preceding the budget year. If the total amount paid by the Participant during
586 any calendar year is different from the amount due and owing for the calendar year based on
587 actual AADF and O&M Costs and Overhead Costs, a final adjusting bill or payment shall be
588 made by the City by May 1 of the subsequent year, with the adjustment being paid or credited in
589 six (6) equal monthly installments. The estimated current monthly payments shall be computed
590 on the basis of the following formula:
591
592 Allocation = (Most recent January through December flow %) X (Adopted O&M Budget)/12
593
- 13 -
Packet Pg. 130
6.1.a
594 Note: for the purposes of this Agreement, the O&M budget shall include direct costs, including
595 overhead.
596
597 The City shall provide the Participants with a full accounting of all flows for each calendar year,
598 as well as a separate summary of the actual O&M Costs incurred during the previous calendar
599 year. The flows and costs will include all Facilities and shall be provided at the earliest time
600 possible during the calendar year and no later than May 1, barring unforeseen circumstances.
601
602 Each Participant's monthly payments shall be due at the earliest date depending on the
603 Participant's accounts payable cycle. In the event that any Participant's payment is received more
604 than forty-five (45) days after receipt of City's bill, the City shall be entitled to a late payment
605 surcharge equal to the interest which the payment would have earned for the period in excess of
606 forty-five (45) days, based on an interest rate typically used for municipal investing purposes.
607
608 7. 2. Overhead Costs. Each Participant will pay an Overhead Cost equal to twenty (20)
609 percent of the direct O&M Costs allocable to that Participant. The Overhead Cost applies to the
610 City's general administrative, supervisory and other indirect costs related to the operation and
611 maintenance of the Facilities. The Overhead Cost percentage may be reviewed and modified by
612 the Oversight Committee at the request of the City or Participants.
613
614 7. 3. Standby Maintenance Charge_ Whenever a Participant discontinues the discharge of
615 Domestic Sewage into the Facilities or discharges less than 0.3 MGD of Domestic Sewage into
616 the Facilities for a period of thirty (30) days or more, the Participant shall pay to the City in lieu
617 of the monthly charge described above (Section 7.1) until it regularly discharges more than 0.3
618 MGD, a standby maintenance charge, which shall be a monthly fee calculated by the City to
619 provide for the Participant's proportionate share (as defined in Section 3.2) of the City's fixed
620 (not related to amount of sewage) costs of operating and maintaining the Facilities in a condition
621 of readiness to accept and treat Domestic Sewage at the full capacity of the Facilities. The
622 Participant shall give the City written notice of its intention to discontinue the discharge of
623 Domestic Sewage (or to reduce its regular discharge to less than 0.3 MGD) at least two (2)
624 months prior to such discontinuance, and shall give the City two (2) months' notice of its
625 intention to commence discharging Domestic Sewage over 0.3 MGD Facilities. Overhead Costs
626 shall be added to this charge.
627
628 7. 4. Facilities Capital Improvements Fund. The City shall establish a Facilities Capital
629 Improvements Fund (FCIF) to handle future capital improvements, major replacements or major
630 repairs to the facilities. Such contributions shall be assessed as needed to maintain a minimum
631 fund balance of $550,000 for the purpose of providing emergency reserves for unanticipated
632 major repairs or replacements. Each Participant shall contribute to the fund in the same ratio as
633 its allocated capacity percentage.
634
635 The City shall establish and annually update a six -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for
636 the Facilities, as well as the proposed method of funding for projects contained in the program.
637 The Parties understand that the six -year CIP is a best attempt to plan for the immediate future but
638 that, given the age of the plant and nature of the business, priorities may change. The Oversight
639 Committee will have input regarding the proposed projects and method of funding.
640
- 14 -
Packet Pg. 131
6.1.a
641 The majority of capital improvements, major replacements or major repairs to the facilities will
642 be paid for by the Facilities Capital Improvements Fund. Significant (approximately $lM or
643 more) projects which could easily exhaust the Facilities Capital Improvements Fund may be
644 financed through an alternative funding method; however, all Parties must be in agreement if
645 funds are to be borrowed to finance a project.
646
647 Every five (5) years the minimum amount of the fund shall be increased to reflect inflationary
648 cost increases using commonly accepted indices as the Engineering News Record (ENR)
649 Construction Index. The increase will be capped at no more than ten (10) percent in any one five-
650 year period.
651
652 Revenue to the fund from interest, incentives or outside treatment of solids will be applied
653 proportionately to all the Parties.
654
655 Grants, depending on the application process and type of grant may be sought individually or
656 jointly. In the case of a joint application, all grant proceeds will be applied proportionately to all
657 Parties. In the case of the City or any Participant applying separately for a grant, the grant could
658 be used to offset their allocation of cost.
659
660 7.5. Rates. Parties shall establish rates and/or collect fees for sewer service in amounts at least
661 sufficient to pay for: (a) the operation and maintenance of the respective sewer system, including
662 its share of the Facilities and (b) the principal of and interest on any and all revenue obligations
663 that constitute a charge upon the revenues of each of the Parties respective sewer system.
664
665 7.6. Books and Accounts. The City shall keep full and complete books of accounts showing
666 the O&M Costs incurred in connection with the Facilities and the portion thereof applicable to
667 each of the Participants. The costs of keeping those books shall be considered to be an O&M
668 Cost to the City. Audits of the books shall be performed every three (3) years, unless waived by
669 the Oversight Committee, and the cost shall be considered a direct cost of the EWTP. More
670 frequent audits, if requested by any Participant, shall be charged to the Participant(s) making the
671 request.
672
673 Section 8. Oversight Committee
674
675 8.1. Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee exists for the purpose of: (a) advising
676 the City concerning operation, maintenance and improvements of the Facilities, (b) giving the
677 Parties the opportunity to resolve any disagreements that may arise between or among them with
678 respect to the operation, maintenance and improvement of the Facilities and (c) for the additional
679 purposes described in this Agreement. The Oversight Committee shall consist of a designated
680 representative (or designated alternate representative) from each of the Parties. Parties shall have
681 one vote each.
682
683 8.2. Oversightof Operations and Maintenance. The Oversight Committee shall meet at least
684 quarterly unless, by a vote of at least a majority of the votes held by the Parties, the Oversight
685 Committee decides to meet less frequently. At each meeting of the Oversight Committee the City
686 shall report to the Participants concerning the operation, maintenance and improvements of the
687 Facilities.
- 15 -
Packet Pg. 132
6.1.a
688
689 On or before September 1 of each year, the City shall provide to the Participants a preliminary
690 proposed budget for operation, maintenance and improvement of the Facilities for the next year.
691 The City shall review and consider any reports and recommendations made by the Oversight
692 Committee on subjects and matters related to operation and maintenance, and improvement to
693 the facilities.
694
695 Section 9. Replacement Standards; Insurance
696
697 9. 1. Replacement and Rehabilitation Standards. Replacement, reconstruction, rehabilitation,
698 expansion or upgrading of the Facilities shall be in accordance with applicable federal and state
699 laws and regulations. Additions, betterments and improvements to the Facilities of the City shall
700 be installed and constructed in accordance with generally recognized engineering standards at
701 least equal to the standards of the City and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and
702 local laws and regulations.
703
704 9. 2. Insurance. The City shall purchase and maintain on behalf of all the Participants, through
705 either companies or insurance pools, insurance for property damage and liability coverage
706 sufficient to pay for all loss or damage to the Facilities resulting from their operation in a normal
707 and prudent manner. Each Participant shall purchase and maintain, through companies or
708 insurance pools, insurance sufficient to pay for all loss or damage to the Facilities caused by the
709 operation of its Internal System. In the alternative, the City or a Participant may set aside cash in
710 a reserve fund in an amount to meet requirements established by the State.
711
712 Section 10. Dispute Resolution
713
714 10.1 Mediation. It is the intent of the Parties to resolve all disputes between them without
715 litigation, to the extent possible. Therefore, in the event of a dispute between or among any of
716 the Parties concerning any matters arising under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the
717 dispute will first be considered by the Oversight Committee in a non -binding manner. If the
718 dispute is not settled by the Oversight Committee within sixty (60) days of the dispute being
719 identified, within thirty (30) days thereafter, the City or any Participant may pursue mediation
720 through a process to be mutually agreed upon in good faith between the Parties to the dispute,
721 which may include binding or non -binding decisions or recommendations. The Parties to the
722 dispute shall mutually agree upon a mediator(s), who shall be an individual(s) skilled in the legal
723 and business aspects of the subject matter of this Agreement. If the Parties to the dispute cannot
724 agree upon a mediator, the matter shall be submitted to Judicial Arbitration and Mediation
725 Services, Inc. (JAMS) and request made that a mediator(s) be appointed. The Parties to the
726 dispute shall share equally the costs of mediation and assume their own costs. This requirement
727 to mediate the dispute may only be waived by mutual written agreement before the City or a
728 Participant may proceed to arbitration as provided by this Agreement.
729
730 10.2 Arbitration. In the event that a dispute between or among any of the Parties, concerning any
731 matters arising under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, cannot be resolved through
732 the processes outlined above, unless specifically excluded from arbitration, the dispute will be
733 placed before an arbitrator in the King/Snohomish County vicinity approved by the Parties to the
- 16 -
Packet Pg. 133
6.1.a
734 dispute.
735
736 The Parties to the dispute shall select an arbitrator within ninety (90) days to hear the dispute.
737 The Parties to the dispute will each choose five (5) arbitrators from the Judicial Arbitration and
738 Mediation Services, Inc. (JAMS) and/or Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) list of arbitrators and
739 submit to the City who will prepare the arbitrators list. After receipt of same, the Parties to the
740 dispute shall, within fourteen (14) calendar days, alternately strike the names of the arbitrators
741 until only one name remains. The arbitrator shall be asked to render a decision within thirty (30)
742 days of the close of the hearing, unless the Parties to the dispute mutually agree to an extension.
743
744 The arbitrator shall be authorized to grant any temporary, preliminary or permanent equitable
745 remedy or relief it deems just and equitable and within the scope of this Agreement, including,
746 without limitation, an injunction or order for specific performance. Notwithstanding this
747 agreement to arbitrate, The City or Participant may seek emergency equitable relief before the
748 Snohomish County Superior Court in order to maintain the status quo pending arbitration and
749 hereby agree to submit to the exclusive personal jurisdiction of the Snohomish County Superior
750 Court for such purpose. A request for interim measures shall not be deemed a waiver of the right
751 to arbitrate.
752
753 Except as prohibited by law, the City or Participant prevailing in any arbitration brought to
754 enforce this Agreement shall be entitled to recover costs including reasonable attorney's
755 fees. The arbitrator's fees and costs shall be shared equitably by the Parties to the dispute unless
756 determined otherwise by the arbitrator. This Agreement shall in all respects be governed by the
757 laws of the State of Washington. Venue for any action to enforce any provision of this
758 Agreement shall be exclusively in King or Snohomish County depending on the arbitrator
759 chosen. The Parties, by their signatures to this Agreement, agree to submit to said arbitrator's
760 jurisdiction and to waive all defenses related to jurisdiction and venue. However, the Parties by
761 agreement may mutually waive arbitration in which case disputes will be brought before the
762 Snohomish County Court.
763
764 Section 11. Successors and Assigns
765
766 This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon successors in interest and
767 assigns of the Parties and is not intended to confer rights or benefits upon any third party except
768 as expressly stated herein. Performance of the obligations undertaken by the City or Participants
769 may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the other, which consent shall not be
770 unreasonably withheld.
771
772 Section 12. Amendment or Modification
773
774 No amendment or modification to this Agreement, including any addition or deletion thereto,
775 shall be effective unless approved and executed by the Parties in the same form and manner as,
776 and subject to, the remaining provisions of this Agreement. In the event the City contracts with
777 any Participant in a manner that modifies the term of this Agreement, the City and that
778 Participant shall offer the other Participants the opportunity to incorporate the same terms in this
- 17 -
Packet Pg. 134
6.1.a
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
Agreement or in additional contracts, assuming the modifications are applicable to the
Participants.
Section 13. Governing Laws
This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington. Venue in connection with any legal proceeding affecting this Agreement shall be in
the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Snohomish County.
Section 14. Number and gender
Whenever applicable the use of the singular number shall include the plural, the use of the plural
number shall include the singular and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders.
Section 15. Notice
All notices and payments relating to this Agreement shall be made in writing and delivered to the
following addresses, unless the City and Participants are otherwise previously notified in writing:
To the City:
City of Edmonds
121 51h Ave. North
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Section 16. Term and Termination
To the Participant:
City of Mountlake Terrace
P.O. Box 72
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043-0072
Olympic View Water and Sewer District
8128 228 Street SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
Ronald Wastewater District
17505 Linden Ave. N.
P. O. Box 33490
Seattle, WA 98133
The term of this Agreement shall be effective immediately upon acceptance through
December 31, 2048. Three (3) years prior to the end of this period, the Parties will negotiate in
good faith towards the continuance of this Agreement with the understanding that the economic
terms of continued participation will reflect the investment of the Participants in the Facilities
and the remaining useful life and remaining capacity of the Facilities at that time.
Participants wishing to terminate this agreement must notify the Parties five (5) years prior to the
intended termination. The cost of terminating the contract will include Standby Maintenance
Charges, as defined in Section 7.3, and Facilities Capital Improvement Fund expenses for an
additional five (5) years after termination.
- 18 -
Packet Pg. 135
6.1.a
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
Section 17. Arbitration Ruling, Memorandum of Understandings, 1988 Agreement
This Agreement supersedes and replaces the 1988 Agreement, the Arbitration Ruling, and all
Memorandum of Understanding documents, all of which will have no further force and effect.
Section 18. Exhibits
All exhibits attached to this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference.
EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE, to be effective as of the date set forth above, or such later
effective date as may be required under Chapter 3 9.3 4 RCW, if applicable.
CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
By
City Manager
OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
C
President, Board of Commissioners
- 19 -
CITY OF EDMONDS
By_
Mayor
RONALD WASTEWATER
DISTRICT
I0
President, Board of Commissioners
Packet Pg. 136
6.1.a
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
Exhibit A
Allocated Capacity and Proportionate Share
ALLOCATED CAPACITY OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE OF THE
EDMONDS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IN MGD
CATEGORIES
ALLOCATED CAPACITY AND
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION %
PARTY
AADF
MADF
EDMONDS
4.6216
5.9929
50.787
M.L.TERRACE
2.1088
2.7345
23.174
OVWSD
1.5061
1.953
16.551
RWD
0.8634
1.1196
9.488
TOTALS
9.10
11.8
100
NOTE:
AADF- ANNUAL
AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
MADF- MONTHLY AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
- 20 -
Packet Pg. 137
6.1.a
863
864 Exhibit B
865
866 Equivalent Customer Units Calculation
867
868 In areas of co -mingled and/or unmetered flows, direct measurement of one Participant's flows
869 through the Internal System of another Participant may not be practical. In such a case the Parties
870 agree to allocate the sewage flows based on Equivalent Customer Units (ECU's). ECU's are
871 based on total water consumption, the total number of customers connected to the sewer system
872 utilizing a private well and HSD equivalents in a given zone.
873
874 Methodologies:
875
876 1. 1 ECU is assessed for every 1017 cu. ft. of water usage per month on average. 1017 cu
877 ft. is the average water usage for a typical single family home. All water usage during
878 the months of January — April and November — December will be reported in cu. ft./
879 month / zone. This data will be used to assess the total ECU count per zone based on
880 water usage.
881
882 Total Yearly Water Consumption in a given zone = (Jan+Feb+Mar+Apr+Nov+Dec)/ 6 * 12
883
884 Total Yearly Water Consumption/ 12 = Monthly Average
885
886 Monthly Average/ 1017 cu. ft. _ # of ECU's
887
888
889 2. 1 ECU is assessed based upon each sewage user in a zone that utilizes a private well for
890 their water source.
891
892 3. 1 ECU is assessed for every HSD whose BOD or TSS is > 250 mg/1(monitoring is
893 triggered by a SIU or Industrial Discharge permit issued by the DOE). 1 ECU is assessed
894 per 16 pounds of BOD or TSS per month.
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
- 21 -
Packet Pg. 138
6.1.a
Exhibit C
Project Costs and Financing Parameters
Total Cost
$39,500,000
Bond Interest
8%
Future Value Interest Rate
8%
Grant
50%
Term
20
(defined by capacity seller on the basis
of a commonly used public finance
Capacity
(MGD's)
9.075
Yearly Payment
$22,166
index for municipal investments. It can
be equal to the bonding interest rate.)
1988 Net cost of 0.1
MGD (Approx. 430 Homes
$217,631
Future Value of 0.1 MGD in year 20 $1,014,368
Average daily flow from a typical home, gal.
230
Annual value equals the difference between successive future values
Actual Debt
Cumulative
Year
Service
Value
Future Value
Annual Value
Year
Future Value
Annual Va
1
$22,166
$22,166
$22,166
$22,166
31
$2,365,140
$175,19(
2
$22,166
$44,332
$46,106
$23,939
32
$2,554,351
$189,211
3
$22,166
$66,499
$71,960
$25,855
33
$2,758,699
$204,34f
4
$22,166
$88,665
$99,883
$27,923
34
$2,979,395
$220,69(
5
$22,166
$110,831
$130,040
$30,157
35
$3,217,747
$238,35,
6
$22,166
$132,997
$162,610
$32,569
36
$3,475,166
$257,42(
7
$22,166
$155,163
$197,784
$35,175
37
$3,753,180
$278,01;
8
$22,166
$177,329
$235,773
$37,989
38
$4,053,434
$300,25z
9
$22,166
$199,496
$276,801
$41,028
39
$4,377,709
$324,27`
10
$22,166
$221,662
$321,112
$44,310
40
$4,727,925
$350,21'
11
$22,166
$243,828
$368,967
$47,855
41
$5,106,160
$378,23z
12
$22,166
$265,994
$420,650
$51,684
42
$5,514,652
$408,49;
13
$22,166
$288,160
$476,469
$55,818
43
$5,955,824
$441,17,
14
$22,166
$310,327
$536,752
$60,284
44
$6,432,290
$476,46(
15
$22,166
$332,493
$601,859
$65,106
45
$6,946,874
$514,5K
16
$22,166
$354,659
$672,174
$70,315
46
$7,502,624
$555,75(
17
$22,166
$376,825
$748,114
$75,940
47
$8,102,833
$600,21(
18
$22,166
$398,991
$830,129
$82,015
48
$8,751,060
$648,22'
19
$22,166
$421,157
$918,705
$88,576
49
$9,451,145
$70008`
20
$22,166
$443,324
$1,014,368
$95,663
50
$10,207,237
$756:09,
21
$1,095,517
$81,149
51
$11,023,815
$816,575
22
$1,183,159
$87,641
52
$11,905,721
$881,90`
23
$1,277,811
$94,653
53
$12,858,178
$952,45f
24
$1,380,036
$102,225
54
$13,886,833
$1,028,65
25
$1,490,439
$110,403
55
$14,997,779
$1,110,94
26
$1,609,674
$119,235
56
$16,197,602
$1,199,82
27
$1,738,448
$128,774
57
$17,493,410
$1,295,8C
28
$1,877,524
$139,076
58
$18,892,882
$11399,47
29
$2,027,726
$150,202
59
$20,404,313
$1,511,43
30
$2,189,944
$162,218
60
$22,036,658
$1,632,34
907 The Future Value detailed above will be used to determine the capital value of permanent transfers of capacity.
908 The Annual Value detailed above will be used to determine the capital value of temporary transfers of capacity. The
909 monthly value in any calendar year will be one twelfth of the annual value for the year.
910
- 22 -
3
d
.r
Q
Packet Pg. 139
6.1.a
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
Exhibit D
Edmonds Trunk Line, Meters and Outfall
Treatme!E52�JJE52
Plant Out
ES
Treatment
Plant
E51
City of
Edmonds
f
�t3
W1 ]1II
�I1 E40
W1DE30
05
W1A
1 04
City of
Woodway
Meter 4
WOODWAY I (abandoned)
C+�3
Legend
■ Meter
��Sewer Oi fall Line
O SewerTwrk Line
1 Mile
MMMOMI
E1A
WL1 L3
J-I
E1
E2 f
i
E7
E42 VA
I
Meter 3
02
Meter C
R2
City of
Shoreline
City of
Lynnwood
P7
----------- - M2
Meter 1 f41
01 -
iE21 Meter 2 city Of
Mountlake
/ Terrace
mi
E1 M1
Meter D 1
- E9
9ter B Meter A
R1
City.fF"^'°^4'" p Edmonds WWTP
zoo znd A- s
U"°"'''"A'a°'° Trunk Line, Meters, and Outfall
- 23 -
J— a ey 2016
d
Q
Packet Pg. 140
6.1.a
918
919
920 Sewer Zones
W1 E3
W16
W1A
WWTP Zone
Et E52 03
WOOBWAY
- E1A - E7 - 04
E1E E7A 05
- E2 E9 P1
- E21 _ LIE PARK
E3 i L2 R1
_ E36 ._ L3 R2
- E4 _ M1 RONALD
EA) MZ W1
- E42 - M3 - W1A
- E5 01 W19
E51 02 WOODWAY
1 Mile
Cmu of Edmonds WWTP
2 C0 2nd Ave 5
FLmand s, WA 48010
921
922
04
Exhibit E
PARK
E1 B
L1ES L2
E1 A
PARK
AM E!
02 E9 :adi
fit
Edmonds WWTP A
Sewer Zones
Jan—ry 2016
- 24 -
3
d
Q
Packet Pg. 141
6.1.a
923
924
925
926
927
928
Exhibit F
Participants Jurisdictions
0
i II 3:#1 City of
,lu Lynnwood
Ij
—
I
Z3
_
Edmondsr'
Sewer
%
_ ..
I • . . �r� •1
i
�
• �� 1
:� 4
a
46 �.
�
1
,i
1
City of
hoax Mountlake
1
Terrace 1`
Olympic
♦•
�♦
View y` 1
Sewer' 1
i
Pal
.
t •�
ip
.
Rona6 �'
�
�
•
5ewex �
- Edmonds Sencce Boundary all
Distric
ftnald Meter B/C j
1
R—ld Sewer District
Edmonds Sewer
;
Otympic View Sewer
r
City of Mountlake Terrace
y
1
7 Mile
1
20 2ndEdmondsp Edmonds WWTP
760 2nd A. 5 1
Edmonds, WA 1,1111
.a �mr���„„� p�L Service Area
�em..m.�.�xmr.m.�. w�uT..n.��.rmim�l�•R`��aneslJ u.ss.emn.n...�e Jsn—Y 2016
— 25 —
Packet Pg. 142
6.1.a
929
930
931
932
Exhibit G
Edmonds WWTP Influent Flowchart
ZONEL75y ONE M-7 CNE M11-1 ZONE EOB ZONE R-D1
ZONE E-2 1
® �® PUMP STATIGJ � ZONE&1
ZONE Eo7 � ZOONE 0.1 ~ ZONE R-2 � �1 OVWD R 6EACH U
/ ZONE B-5 PS.
ZONE E-21 OWVD EDMOND5 EDMON DS WOODWAY
ZOIJE 41 Z(NJE EEO ZOc
MT-
ZCN EE-7A ZONE 0.3 ~7
EDMONDS ZOYE E�2E V aM DSO ZONE W-IW-I I
ZONE E-30 � EDMONOS
WAD � 0�1P ZONE E-SZ
ZPNE Rd IXJE OA � � ZONE E-3
METER AT INFLUENT BEACH
YJVY7P METER AT INFLUENT
1YYJ7P METER AT
WWTP
- 26 -
Packet Pg. 143
6.1.a
933
934
935
936
Exhibit H
Collection Overview
E46—
■ Meter
E1A
4- NffTP OULWL
—SR104 Trunk
— Edmonds Force Maim
•
/
— Edmonds Mains
♦
Lyrmvood mains
OIY.pi Yiew Maim
.P7
C
— 7l—W Mains
L
— MLT Mm"
y
LIFdmendss�comrmtmert Area
Es—
T— —t
PLant OatlalL •~
E52
Edmonds
ES'
r
L3
Treatment •.
PWnt
t`3
f
f E51
E4
E2 LE1 /.r
I E3
I
E7
\ W1
4
E42J
E2
M2 r
+
jW16 - E D
II11
E40y
L
M1f
Meter 1 '1
1
r WIA
O�
1O7 Meter2
city of
4,
E21
t e 1
Meter 4
Wood ay (a6andonetl)
M1
/
0
Meter E
E
EaR
City of
WODDWAY
El M3
1
Brier
f
/
/
04
1
Meter 3 V`
Meter D
R. D2
E9
Meterr
`mrI
µeter5 µeterA EiYIC
WWrP Zone
R2
-
I
"
El Mi
EIA M2
!
i
E15 M3
■
E2 01
E21 02
E3 03
E30 04
City of Lake
E4 04R
5
Forest Park
E40 05
E42 P1
E5 PARK
E51 R1
E52 R2
E7 RONALD
VA Wl
rs
E9 W1A
L10 W10
L2 WOODWAY
L3
1 Mile
L i
"`Y°'Um° d ""` Edmonds WWTP zeo zed nre s l
EdmorWs. WA 9EV20 /�
-•� Collection System Overview Mamh2016
- 27 -
3
d
tr
Q
Packet Pg. 144
6.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Presentation of the Proposed 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvement Program (30
minutes)
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
None.
Staff Recommendation
A Public Hearing has been scheduled for November 1, 2016.
Narrative
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital
projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a
list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the
City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital
projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects
are identified within the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan
projects which encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects.
CIP vs. CFP
The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to
different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying
those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital
needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City levels of service standards. The CFP is also required to be
consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are
restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP.
The proposed 2017-2022 CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has three project sections comprised of
General, Transportation and Stormwater. The proposed 2017-2022 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP
has two sections related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's
financial fund numbers. Exhibit 3 is a comparison that shows added, deleted and changed projects
between last year's CFP/CIP to the proposed CFP/CIP.
The CFP and CIP were presented to the Planning Board on September 28th and a public hearing was
held on October 12th. The Planning Board provided comments and recommended the CFP and CIP be
forwarded to the City Council for approval. The minutes (draft for October 12th) from the Planning
Board meeting are attached as Exhibits 4 and 5.
Packet Pg. 145
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
U~�
2017-2022
St. �
P-3
%�p
DRAFT
Packet Pg. 146
M
N
iu
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
G�
z
UAttachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
n
OM
M
N
M
N
iu
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Parks, General, and Regional Projects
(2017-2022)
Current
Grant
Project
(2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
Opportunity
Phase
Total Cost
Revenue Source
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Aquatic Facility
Meet citizen needs for an Aquatics
$0
Public Vote
Center (Feasibility study complete
Unknown
Conceptual
$0
G.O. Bonds
August 2009).
$0
$0
Total
5-$23 M
Civic Center Development
City master plan in progress
$0
Public Vote
RCO Land
Conceptual
$135,000
REET 1 / Grants
$135,000
Acquisition
$0
G.O. Bonds
$135000
Total
$135,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$3,135,000
Community Park / Athletic Complex -
In cooperation with ESD#15 develop
$0
Capital Campaign
Old Woodway High School: Phase 2 and 3
a community park and athletic
RCO
Phasel
$0
REET 2
complex.
Complete
$0
School District
$0
Foundation
$0
Grants
$0
Total
Unknown
Parks & Facilities Maintenance & Operations
Replace / Renovate deteriorating
$0
Public Vote
Building
building in City Park.
Unknown
Conceptual
$0
G.O. Bonds
$0
$0
Total
$3-4M
Waterfront RedevlopmenWVaterfront Walkway
Rehabilitate grounds, parking, beach
$1,600,000
REET / Grants
$1,600,000
Completion
access and area around Senior
Unknown
Conceptual
$0
G.O. Bonds
Center, walkway access.
$500,000
Park Impact Fees
$500,000
$0
Private Partnership
$2,100,000
Total
$2,100,000
Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry / Mutimodal
Relocate ferry terminal to Marina
EIS
$0
Federal (Unsecured)
Facility
Beach.
US DOT
Completed
$0
State Funds
$0
Total
Unknown
Public Market (Downtown Waterfront)
Acquire and develop property for a
year round public market.
Unknown
Conceptual
$0
Grants
I
$0
Total
Unknown
Edmonds Waterfront Analysis
Develop alternatives to improve
$150,000
General Local Funds
$150,000
emergency access and safety
Unknown
Conceptual
$0
Grants
improvements.
$150,000
Total
$150,000
Unknown
Total CFP 1 1 $2,385,000 1 Annual CFP Totals 1 $2,250,000 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,500,000 1 $1,500,000
6.2.a
C
O
y+
y+
C
G1
N
(D
IL
N
N
O
N
ti
r
O
N
IL
U-
'a
L)
y+
a
Packet Pg. 150
M
N
iu
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.2.a
PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 —
$23,000,000
Man
t
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study
completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the
consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the
summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of
its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of
Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the
current pool.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$5m - $23m
x all or part of this Project may quality for 1% for the Arts
r
Q
7
Packet Pg. 152
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,135,000
/ Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of
the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some
grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park at this
site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds
applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$135,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
TOTAL
$135,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
Packet Pg. 153
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
Complex at the Former Woodway High School
FORMER WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL
ATHLETIC FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
PRE PAnto fOX THE E DMON DS SCHOOL DISH ICT
ra CIA HOGAN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted
or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District,
community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon
successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project for all 3 phases.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under maintained
facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing controlled
access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized
area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the future for an
additional $6-8M.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-
COST
2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTALI
I
I
Unknown
" all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
S
2
r
r
c
m
U)
a�
L
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
d
LL
U
d
U
an
co
9
Packet Pg. 154
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million
Maintenance & Operations Building
Building Outline
Perime(er zone — 4,200 st
Existing Fence Line
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the
end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this
existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City
parks and Capital facilities for the long term.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real
estate taxes.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3m - $4m
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
10
Packet Pg. 155
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.2.a
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,100,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
Euf�� 1�C R�.� �•{yljl ��
- To Bncn }-
7 -�
' -----
--------------
------ ®R.--�
A 4
kYr�4
Prapvwd Rmw4
W arerlront Ganrer
1
- � raAm°wrtdno
� rrnrprre�
BEa Ova � j�� 1�• 4�EEYw'�trrbn-
. �.�•
$
nop..W ww.e��w
ia. trm
9�rrti yggtr pl.�n q
O �-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic
Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$100,000
Construction
$2,000,000
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$2,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
11
Packet Pg. 156
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.2.a
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Crossing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
WSDOT Ferry / Multimodal Facility
011114*�M*
Modified
Pt. Edwards Alternative
p
-
uHacu
paf of�'s„y,�
�.r
ym ee mnmaol
A1r4r
IMrJ�
yQy„
mom am
Edw��.ls
Z
.e+.s..nm
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Crossing is multimodal transportation center that will
provide the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting
various forms of travel including rail, ferry, bus, walking and ridesharing.
NOTE: The design of Marina Beach Park is a separate project.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide an efficient point of connection between
existing and planned transportation modes.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-
2037
Engineering &
Administration
of Way
—Right
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
Unknown
S
O
d
N
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
d
LL
U
d
U
Cn
r
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
12
Packet Pg. 157
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
Waterfront)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public
market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community
gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a
valuable asset to Edmonds.
SCHEDULE:
This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners
willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished
by 2018.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
Unknown
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
13
Packet Pg. 158
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Waterfront ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
Analysis
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Alternative analysis to study, 1) Waterfront access issues
emphasizing and prioritizing near term solutions to providing emergency access, also
including, but not limited to, 2) At grade conflicts where Main and Dayton Streets
intersect BNSF Rail lines, 3) Pedestrian/bicycle access, and 4) Options to the Edmonds
Crossing Multimodal Terminal Project (Identified as Modified Alternative 2) within the
2004 Final Environmental Impact Statement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve waterfront access.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$150,000
Unknown
14
Packet Pg. 159
cn O
y
y
O
rt
c Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
n
ITI
It
P,
N
M
N
iu
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Transportation Projects
(2017-2022)
Grant
(2017-2022)
Project Name Purpose
Opportunity
Project Phase
Total Cost
Funding Source
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Safety / r-rity Gnalv_ci_c
228th St. SW Corridor Safety
Realign highly skewed intersection to
$25,000
(Federal or State secured)
$25,000
Improvements
address safety and improve
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
operations; create new east -west
corridor between SR-99 and 1-5.
Construction
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI.
Install two-way left turn lanes and
$0
(Federal or State secured)
W
sidewalks to improve capacity and
pedestrian safety (project split with
$375,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$75,000
$300,000
$8,690,000
Snohomish County)
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$1,356,000
$375,000
Total
$75,000
$300,000
$10,046,000
76th Av. W @ 212th St. SW
Intersection improvements to
$3,006,500
(Federal or State secured)
$2,920,000
$86,500
Intersection Improvements
improve intersection delay and level
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
of service (LOS).
Construction
$0
(Unsecured)
$2,086,663
(Local Funds)
$2,073,163
$13,500
$5,093,163
Total
$4,993,163
$100,000
Highway 99 Gateway / Revitalization
Install gateway elements and safety
$10,000,000
(Federal or State secured)
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
improvements along SR-99 Corridor.
$2,600,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$1,600,000
$1,000,000
$72,400,000
State
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
Appropriation
$300,000
(Local Funds)
$300,000
$12,900,000
Total
$300,000
$6,600,000
$6,000,000
$72,400,000
SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave W
Improve intersection safety by
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Intersection Improvements
converting a stop controlled
$744,500
(Federal or State unsecured)
$122,000
$87,500
$535,000
intersection for NB and SB
movements to a signalized
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
intersection.
$158,500
(Local Funds)
$71,000
$87,500
$903,000
Total
$193,000
$175,000
$535,000
Main St. and 9th Ave S
Install traffic signal to improve
$0
(Federal or State secured)
intersection delay and Level of
Service (mini roundabout is an
$894,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$118,000
$776,000
alternative solution).
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$17,000
(Local Funds)
$17,000
$911,000
Total
$135,000
$776,000
76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW
Convert split phasing operation for
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Intersection Improvements
EB and We movements to
$5,637,450
(Federal or State unsecured)
$285,450
$1,557,000
$3,795,000
concurrent through movements, with
protected / permissive LT phasing.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$287,550
(Local Funds)
$44,550
$243,000
$5,925,000
Total
$330,000
$1,800,000
$3,795,000
Hwy 99 @ 212th St SW Intersection
Widen 212th St. SW to add a
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Improvements
westbound left turn lane for 200'
$2,783,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$152,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
storage length and an eastbound left
turn lane.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$23,000
(Local Funds)
$23,000
$2,806,000
Total
$175,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
6.2.a
C
O
y+
y+
C
d
N
i
N
N
(D
N
ti
O
N
IL
LL
'a
L)
C1
r
r
v
N
N
O
N
ti
r
O
N
a
LL
V
L
0
r
t
K
LLI
y.i
C
d
E
t
ti
y+
y+
a
Packet Pg. 162
00
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Transportation Projects
(2017-2022)
Grant
�Project!Phasj
(2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
Opportunity
To
'ding Source
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023.2037
Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection
Widen 216th St. SW to add a left
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Improvement
turn lane for eastbound and
$2,313,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$142,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
westbound movements.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$22,000
(Local Funds)
$22,000
$2 335 000
Total
$164,000
$334 000
$1 837 000
Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection
Widen 220th St. SW and Hwy 99 to
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Improvement
add a westbound right turn lane (for
325, storage length) and a soutbound
$3,192,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$152,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
left turn lane (for 275' storage
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
length).
$23,000
(Local Funds)
$23,000
$3,215,000
Total
$175,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / 15th St. SW
Extend left turn storage area for W B
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Intersection Improvements
movement on SR-104 w/ various
$179,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$15,000
$164,000
bicycle and pedestrian
improvements.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$15,000
(Local Funds)
$15,000
$194,000
Total
$30,000
$164,000
SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection
Convert EB and W B LT along SR-
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Improvements
104 to protected LT phasing;
$485,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$65,000
$420,000
upgrade ADA curb ramps; and add
C-Curb for access management
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$10,000
(Local Funds)
$10,000
$495,000
Total
$75,000
$420,000
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection
Install traffic signal to improve
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Improvements
vehicular and pedestrian safety;
$1,311,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$173,000
$1,138,000
revise geometry to allow for safer
turns.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$27,000
(Local Funds)
$27,000
$1,338,000
Total
$200,000
$1,138,000
Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W
Install traffic signal to reduce the
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Intersection Improvements
intersection delay and improve Level
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$1,183,000
of Service.
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$1,183,000
84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th
Install two-way left turn lanes and
$0
(Federal or State secured)
St. SW)
sidewalk to improve capacity and
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$15,441,000
pedestrian safety (split with
Snohomish County)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$15,441,000
6.2.a
C
O
y+
C
d
N
d
L
N
N
O
N
1-
r
O
N
IL
LL
'a
L)
01
r
N
N
O
N
ti
r
O
N
a
LL
V
0
r
y+
Z
t
K
LLI
y.i
C
d
E
t
ti
y+
y+
a
Packet Pg. 163
(D
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Transportation Projects
(2017-2022)
Grant (2017-2022)
Project Name Purpose Opportunity LojectPhasj To 'ding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023.20
SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W Intersection /
Implement Westgate Circulation
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Westgate Area Improvements
Access Plan, midblock pedestrian
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$1,017,468
crossings along 100th Ave. W, and
rechannelization with bike lanes /
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
sharrows along 100th Ave. W.
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$1 017 468
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection
Add a 2nd W B left turn lane (split
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Improvements
with Shoreline).
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$3,017,000
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$3,017 000
Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW
Install traffic signal to improve Level
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Intersection Improvements
of Service and intersection delay.
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$610,000
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$610 000
Non -motorized Pedestrian / Bicvcle Proiects
Sunset Ave. Walkway from Bell St. to
Provide walkway on the west side of
$157,121
(Federal or State secured)
$157,121
Caspers St.
Sunset Ave, with various utility
Possible
$1,870,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$1,870,000
upgrades.
RCO / TIB Grant
Design
$0
(Unsecured)
for construction
$751,129
(Local Funds)
$26,129
$725,000
$2,778,250
Total
$183,250
$2,595,000
Dayton St. between 7th Ave. S to 8th
Provide safe sidewalk along short
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Ave. S Walkway
missing link.
$37,500
(Federal or State unsecured)
$37,500
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$37,500
(Local Funds)
$37,500
$75,000
Total
$75,000
232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to
Improve pedestrian safety along
$0
(Federal or State secured)
SR-104
232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. to
$1,205,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$100,000
$1,105,000
SR-104.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$100,000
(Local Funds)
$100,000
$1,305,000
Total
$200,000
$1,105,000
238th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to
Improve pedestrian safety along
$12,000
(Federal or State secured)
$12,000
104th Ave. W
238th St. SW from 100th Ave. to
104th Ave.
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
Construction
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$12,000
Total
$12,000
236th St SW from Edmonds Way (SR-
Improve pedestrian safety along
$50,600
(Federal or State secured)
$50,600
104) to Madrona Elementary
236th St. SW, creating a safe
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
pedestrian connection from SR-104
to Madrona school.
Construction
$0
(Unsecured)
$38,000
(Local Funds)
$38,000
$88,600
Total
$88,600
236th St SW from Edmonds Way
Improve pedestrian safety along
$0
(Federal or State secured)
(SR-104) to 97th Ave. W
236th St. SW, creating a safe
$1,288,500
(Federal or State unsecured)
$106,500
$1,182,000
pedestrian connection from
SR-104.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$106,500
(Local Funds)
$106,500
$1,395,000
Total
$213,000
$1,182,000
6.2.a
C
O
y+
y+
C
d
N
d
L
N
N
(D
tV
ti
r
O
N
IL
LL
ci
a
c)
t71
r
v
tV
N
O
tV
I-
T_
O
tV
a
LL
V
0
r
y+
Z
t
K
LLI
y.i
C
d
E
t
ti
y+
a
Packet Pg. 164
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Transportation Projects
(2017-2022)
Grant
(2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
O ortunit
Project Phase
Total Cost
Funding Source
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023.2037
84th Ave. W from 238th St. SW to
Improve pedestrian safety along 84th
$0
(Federal or State secured)
234th St. SW
Ave. W. from 238th St. SW to 234th
$90,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$90,000
$495,000
St. SW.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$90,000
Total
$90,0001
$495,000
80th Ave. W from 212th St SW to
Improve pedestrian safety along 80th
$0
(Federal or State secured)
206th St. SW
Ave. W, within proximity to Edmonds
$1,439,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$210,000
$1,229,000
Woodway High School.
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$1 439 000
Total
$210,000
$1 229 000
2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St.
Provide safe sidewalk along short
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Walkway
missing link.
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$30,000
(Local Funds)
$30,000
$30,000
Total
$30,000
Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th
Provide safe sidewalk, connecting to
$0
(Federal or State secured)
St. SW
ex. sidewalk along 200th St. SW
$1,591,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$230,000
$681,000
$680,000
(direct link to Maplewood Elementary
School).
Possible grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$1,591,000
Total
$230,000
$681,000
$680,000
95th Pl. W from 224th St. SW to 220th
Provide sidewalk on one side of 95th
$0
(Federal or State secured)
St. SW
PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St.
$409,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$84,000
$325,000
SW completing missing link)
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$141,000
(Local Funds)
$21,000
$120,000
$550,000
Total
$105,000
$445,000
218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to
Provide safe sidewalk along a
$0
(Federal or State secured)
84th Ave. W
missing link of 218th St. SW. from
76th Ave. to 84th Ave.
$978,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$100,000
$878,000
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$327,000
(Local Funds)
$100,000
$227,000
$1,305,000
Total
$200,000
$1,105,000
Walnut St from 3rd Ave. S to 4th Ave.
Provide short missing link.
$0
(Federal or State secured)
S Walkway
$105,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$105,000
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$105,000
Total
$105,000
216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99
Provide sidewalk on north side of
$0
(Federal or State secured)
to 72nd Ave W
216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd
$137,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$137,000
Ave W (completing missing link)
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$20,000
(Local Funds)
$20,000
$157,000
Total
$157,000
238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy. 99
Provide sidewalk on north side of
$316,800
(Federal or State secured)
$316,800
238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy.
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
99 (completing missing link)
Design
$0
(Unsecured)
$96,200
(Local Funds)
$96,200
$413,000
Total
$413,000
15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th
Provide sidewalk on south side of
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Ave. S
15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th
$200,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$200,000
Ave. S (completing missing link)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$30,000
(Local Funds)
$30,000
$230,000
Total
$30,000
$200,000
6.2.a
C
O
y+
y+
C
d
N
d
L
N
N
O
N
ti
r
O
N
IL
LL
'a
L)
CD
v
N
N
O
N
r
ti
r
O
N
a
LL
V
L
0
r
y+
t
K
LLI
y.i
C
d
E
t
a
Packet Pg. 165
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Transportation Projects
(2017-2022)
Grant
�ProjectPhasj
(2017-2022)
Project Name
Purpose
Opportunity
To
'ding Source
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023.2037
Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave.
Provide sidewalk on one side of Elm
$0
(Federal or State secured)
S
Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
$789,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$156,000
$633,000
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$789,000
Total
$156 000
$633 000
Minor Sidewalk Program
Complete short sidewalk stretches
$0
(Federal or State secured)
throughout the City (annual program)
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$320,000
(Local Funds)
$70,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$700,000
$320 000
Total
$70,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$700 000
191 at St. SW from 80th Ave. W to
Provide sidewalk on one side of
$0
(Federal or State secured)
76th Ave. W
191 th St. SW from 80th Ave. to 76th
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$630,000
Ave. (completing missing link)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$630 000
104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane from
Provide sidewalk on west side of
$0
(Federal or State secured)
238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W
104th Ave. from 238th St. SW to
$0
(Federal State
$990,000
106th Ave. W (completing missing
or unsecured)
link)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$990 000
80th Ave. W from 218th St. SW to
Provide sidewalk on one side of 80th
$0
(Federal or State secured)
220th St. SW
Ave. W from 218th St. SW to 220th
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$315,000
St. SW (completing missing link)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$315,000
84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to
Provide sidewalk on one side of 84th
$0
(Federal or State secured)
186th St. SW
Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$315,000
St. SW
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$315,000
236th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th
Provide sidewalk on one side of
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Ave. W
236th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th
Ave. W
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$765,000
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$765 000
238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th
Provide sidewalk on one side of
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Ave. W
238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th
Ave W
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$1,170,000
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$1,170,000
6.2.a
C
O
y+
r+
C
N
N
d
L
0.
N
N
(D
N
ti
O
N
IL
LL
'a
L)
CD
r
r
v
N
N
O
N
ti
r
O
N
a
LL
V
L
0
r
r+
Z
t
K
LLI
C
d
E
t
ti
y+
y+
a
Packet Pg. 166
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Transportation Projects
(2017-2022)
Grant (2017-2022)
Project Name Purpose Opportunity LojectPhasj To 'ding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023.20
80th Ave. W / 180th St. SW from
Provide sidewalk on one side of 80th
$0
(Federal or State secured)
188th St. SW to OVD
Ave. W / 180th St. SW from 188th
State
$1,350,000
St. SW to OVD
$0
(Federal or unsecured)
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$1 350 000
189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to
Provide sidewalk on one side of
$0
(Federal or State secured)
76th Ave. W
189th Pl. SW from 80th Ave. W to
76th Ave. W
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$585,000
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$0
Total
$585,000
Ferry/Railroad
Ferry Storage Improvements from
Improve ferry queueing by extending
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Pine St. to Dayton St.
ferry storage area along SR-104
$357,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$357,000
(striping changes).
Possible Grant
Conceptual
$0
(Unsecured)
$0
(Local Funds)
$357,000
Total
$357,000
Traffic Plannina Proiects
Trackside Warning System at Dayton
Install wayside horns at bath
$0
(Federal or State secured)
St. and Main St. Railroad Crossings
crossings to reduce noise from train
horns.
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
Design /
$0
(Unsecured)
Construction
$10,000
(Local Funds)
$10,000
$10,000
Total
$10,000
Total CFP 1 1 $49,300,013 1 Annual CFP Totals 1 $6,070,013 1 $150,000 1 $50,000 1 $5,760,000 1 $18,278,000 1 $18,992,000 1 $111,029,468
Revenue Summary by Year
Totals
Source
2017
J 2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
$13,568,021
Total Federal & State Secured
$3,481,521
$86,500
$o
$0
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
$30,809,950
Total Federal &State Unsecured)
$0
$0
$0
$4,517,450
$12,577,500
$13,715,000
$108,363,468
$0
Unsecured
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$610,000
$4,947,0421
LocalFundsl
$2,613,4921
$63,500
$50,000
$1,242,550
$700,500
$277,000
$2,056,000
6.2.a
C
O
y+
r+
C
d
N
d
L
IL
N
N
(D
N
r
1-
cm
IL
LL
L)
'a
L)
CD
r
t0
r
N
N
O
N
I-
r
O
N
IL
LL
V
L
0
1r
X
LU
y.+
d
E
t
t.:
a
Packet Pg. 167
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 228 th St. SW Corridor ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,300,000
Safety Improvements
J
1
2
r
c�
c
m
N
L
a
N
N
0
N
ti
T
0
N
(L
u_
c�
(L
c�
CD
co
T
�r
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) Extend 2281h St across the unopened right-of-way to 76th Avenue West 2)
Signalize the intersection of 2281h St SW @ SR99 and 2281h St. SW @ 761h Ave. West 3) Construct a raised
median in the vicinity of 761h Avenue West. 4) Add illumination between 2241h St SW and 2281h St SW on SR 99 5)
Overlay of 228th St. SW from 801h Ave. W to — 2,000' east of 76th Ave. W.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will improve access / safety to the 1-5 / Mountlake Terrace
Park & Ride from SR99. This east / west connection will reduce demand and congestion along two east -west
corridors (220th Street SW and SR104). Roadway safety will also be improved as SR 99/ 228th Street SW will
become a signalized intersection. 228th St. SW is being overlaid from 80th Pl. W to — 1,000 LF east of 72"d Ave. W.
as well as 76th Ave. W from 228th St. SW to Hwy. 99. The project consists of various utility upgrades.
SCHEDULE: Construction began in 2015 and substantial completion was obtained in May 2016. Physical
completion is scheduled to be reached in October 2016. The only remaining task in 2017 is the completion of the
Federal documentation. Federal and State grants were secured for the construction phase. This project was
combined into one construction contract with the Hwy. 99 (Phase 3) Lighting project.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering,
Administration, and
ROW
Construction
$25,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$25,000
' All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts
23
Packet Pg. 168
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 228 th St. SW from Hwy. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,421,000
99 to 95t" PI. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228t St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95t PI. W to three lanes
(with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety and traffic
flow along this corridor.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2021 (pending funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$75,000
$300,000
Construction
$9,821,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$300,000
$9,821,000
24
Packet Pg. 169
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 76 Ave W @ 212 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,500,000
Intersection Improvements
1
i
i
0
tUMUNUb-VVUUUVVHY
HIGH SCHOOL
I
OFFICE
W
a
R
Fi
1301
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left -turn lane to convert the signal
operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected -permissive phasing. Add a right -turn
lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of
various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level
of service to LOS C.
SCHEDULE: Design was completed in May 2016. The project was advertised in June 2016 but the
lowest bid was rejected since it was - approx. $1.3 Million over budget. The project is scheduled to be
re -advertised in early 2017. A TIB grant to cover the possible shortfall was submitted in August 2016.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$4,993,163
$100,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$4,993,163
$100,000
25
Packet Pg. 170
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $85,000,000
Gateway/Revitalization
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider
replacement sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center
medians for access control and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better
stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead
utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access
management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2017 (pending approval of the 2017
decision package).An HSIP grant was also submitted in July 2016 for this project. The
construction phase is scheduled to begin in 2021 (pending additional funding / $10M from
Connecting Washington allocation has been secured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$300,000
$6,600,000
Administration
& ROW
Construction
$6,000,000
$72,400,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$300,000
$6,600,000
$6,000,000
$72,400,000
26
Packet Pg. 171
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (196t" St. SW)/ 88t" ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000
Ave. W Intersection Improvements
SEVEN DAY
ADVENl1ST
CHURCH 4
196TH Sf SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196 th St. SW @ 88 th Ave. W.
The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and
southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also
address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one
concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be
implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are
met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the
Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the
intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196t" St. SW.
SCHEDULE: The intersection LOS must meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants and be approved
by WSDOT since 196t" St. SW is a State Route (SR524). No funding is currently allocated to this
project (pending grant funding).
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$193,000
$175,000
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$535,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$193,000
$175,000
$535,000
Q
27
Packet Pg. 172
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9th Ave. S :1 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $911,000
BELL Sr
I .WM6
LLF W
a _ a
MAIN St
W
a
S
H
DAYTON 5 ,
Z
WADE JAM ES
THEATER
J
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal (or mini -roundabout is an alternative
solution).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all
approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's
concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the
intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$135,000
Construction
$776,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$135,000
$776,000
28
Packet Pg. 173
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 220" St SW @ 76t" Ave W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
Intersection Improvements $5,925,000
2,9rH sr sw
J
21919
J
J J
3 414
I' Lri
,a
Ui
in
J _J
1 2215TPLSW
TOP FOODS JSTARBU KS
J
220TH ST SW —
1
r
LYNWOOD
HONDA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right
turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for
eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during
southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D.
SCHEDULE: Engineering, ROW, and construction scheduled between 2020 and 2022
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering & ROW
$330,000
$1,800,000
Administration
Construction
$3,795,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$330,000
$1,800,000
$3,795,000
' All or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the arts
29
Packet Pg. 174
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000
intersection improvements
21 g sw:T I
i
W
W Paalung
sign
Shop
/
n
7313
P.u.o
3 Edmonds
Edmonds
/
W Family Clinic ei
ADD Publm%Torks
KENNEL
21 1 27114 /
f Apt.
Q
�azp
211 /
mlla n
2h7e109BAb
n
ox/
/
/
212TH ST Sw
Z1 St
M.-
730,'er CLIPIC
7303"3' ^
n
n Pbol
7W4 "1" 7302 "2"
PARK & RIDE
215TH
W
ST SW
U
W
0
a
PLANT
AEGIS
W SWEDISH
k�MDNnSCAM— '
/
ALLIED /
ROOFING /
B&M /
CON ST
21414 /
21448 /
/
NCnONRLD' 9(
/ 01
1ALUE /
PILLAGE /
16TH ST/SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 212 th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200'
storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left
turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in
2015 Transportation Plan: #4)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding).The
project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is in Lynnwood.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering,
ROW, &
Administration
$175,000
$1,091,000
Construction
$1,540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
30
Packet Pg. 175
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000
intersection improvements
21410
13�
21408w 214021d12
21405
04
LU
N
I{
U
2> 1420
<
MCDONAL6' C
2i43�
un
O an
z 150
r
215 AEGIS
21558
VALUE
2
VILLAGE
ST
SW
-me �/ �
216Tll ST SW
21600 {� 21619
KRUGER
CLINIC f
170,
21632 ��
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216t St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for and an
eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and
westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
ROW &
Administration
$164,000
$334,000
Construction
$1,837,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$164,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
31
Packet Pg. 176
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000
intersection improvements
TOP FOODS
V �
19TH sT SW /
21919 STARBU S
/
/
220TH Sr SW •/�— —
7514
I
I
FUN TA 91A
1221 STPLSW LYNWGOD
HONOA a
I
Uc"s
I
I
13
I w zzzz �
H
hm
I
I 224TH
Ei
FZ/—
/TR"E E R INN
L7
w .F 7223'J'
A.dy's
N td .O. 7391 R
A
r_
a �
a S
H ¢ nm
rsw
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325'
storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275' storage length.
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #1).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and
safety.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
& ROW
$175,000
$1,085,000
Construction
$1,955,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
32
Packet Pg. 177
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 226 1h St. SW / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $194,000
15t" St. SW Intersection Improvements
ALrL_L1
LL
14TH WAY SW .
226TH ST SW
uJ 226TH PL SW
14 F-T
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend the left turn lane for the westbound movement on SR-104.
Complete various pedestrian and bicycle intersection improvements. This project was
identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety at the
intersection and improve traffic flow along the SR-104 corridor.
SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$30,000
Construction
$164,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$164,000
33
Packet Pg. 178
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000
Intersection Improvements
W
r
06
L 06
06
L
Cn
WESTOAT C FIAPE
PARKING
'H ST S
■
1
WESTGATE
CHAPEL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access
management.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.
SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$75,000
Construction
$420,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$420,000
34
Packet Pg. 179
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000
Intersection Improvements
■
To Hwy 99
i
10
239TH ST SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation.
This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in
2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,138,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,138,000
S
0
c
m
a�
a
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
to
LL
U
d
U
N
N
O
N
ti
O
35
Packet Pg. 180
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76 Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000
N
SEAVIEW
PARK
3
PLSW
186TH ST SW
m m
POST 3�
OFFICE, a
I
I
I
I
I
1 .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for
all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The
projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards
(LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2037
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$983,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,183,000
36
Packet Pg. 181
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84 Ave. W (212 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000
to 238" St. SW)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84 th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and
sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list
of the 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along
this collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with
their own facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any
back-up to the through lane when insufficient gaps are provided.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2037
(unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since
half the project is in Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$2,000,000
Administration
Construction
$13,441,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$15,441,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
37
Packet Pg. 182
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468
Intersection Improvements
•
h0
__ L_
EDMONDS WAY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block
pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential
addition of bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor
Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$867,468
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,017,468
38
Packet Pg. 183
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76t Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000
Intersection Improvements
x
M1
M1 y
UJ
O
7M
N
��45 . ■ N
Y O
N
ti
- -EDL WIW Dri 1ELAY- - - - — - - - - — LAKE BALLING €R WAY
--� - ---- --�-_ N
d
LL
U
d
U
an
co
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a 2 nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified
in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037. The project cost would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds
since half the intersection is in Shoreline.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$453,000
Construction
$2,564,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3,017,000
39
Packet Pg. 184
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 174t" St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000
SW Intersection Improvements
L+ 4 + — Meadowdale Middle School — — —
J—/, Parking L—
b 6WI St. Thomas Moore
—� a e
I Catholic School
B Ilfield
y
/ sa��arY
I 1—F1 I—"
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50'
storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for
eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay.
(ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers
accessing either street.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2037
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$100,000
Construction
$510,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$610,000
40
Packet Pg. 185
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,000,000
from Bell St to Caspers St.
s UHDVIEwavrs
♦ ♦ �� I■� 11111■0 I
NONE 0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing
waterfront (— 1/2 mile / more recent project).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements have been installed to evaluate the alignment of the
proposed walkway. Additional modification to the temporary improvements will be completed
in 2017 (since construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2019 / 2020 when utility
improvements are scheduled along this stretch). No grant funding has yet been secured for
the construction phase. The design phase will be completed in 2017.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$183,250
Administration
Construction
$2,595,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$183,250
$2,595,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
41
Packet Pg. 186
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000
between 7t" Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S
MAIM ST
z NO -ISLE FRANCES ANDERSON 4v0 tA
W
❑ Q �
660 701
DAYTOM ST
w MAPLE 5T
T � a
k
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 250') on
Dayton St. between 7t" Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S (ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in
2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$75,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
42
Packet Pg. 187
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 232 nd St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 100t" Ave. W to SR-104
EDMONDS WAY
Wt'.11VARS
.,
LLJ
a�
2 ■
LOTH '
CHURCH ■ ■
■ ■ I Uj
7 I ■
` ■■ _
� Its■ t
a jr
�Q'k C 2
ESTATES AY I _ PARK
28
I l2� REC 2
J ' Y9 ROOM 98 7 6 5 .,
30 2 75 �
37 3 1 14 7• +-'
J \32 45 111 32
N
■ ■ ■■ a`
r
r N
- O
i \� ti
1 r
��■ N
:ssos ic, a
LL
t
co
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232"d St. SW from 1 00Ave. W to SR-104.
This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
43
Packet Pg. 188
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,400,000
100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W and Stormwater
Improvements
2
�
Pp
COMM
wn
m
Z
LIBRARY
m
a
BASEBALL
2357
FIELD
23 TO 42
OLD WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL
236TH PL SW
HICKMAN PARK I
0
0
a
}
x
J
Y
237TH PLSW
3 3
a w
a
V1
tj 0
0
a
d
a
23STF1 ST SW
N
6
� M -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of -- 1,200' of sidewalk on the north side of 238t St. SW
from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W. as well as sharrows. Stormwater improvements will also be
incorporated into the project.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety and create a safe pedestrian
connection between 100th Ave. W and 104th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: Construction is complete. The project was funded by the Safe Routes to School
grant program. Stormwater improvements were funded by the Stormwater Utility Fund 422.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$12,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$12,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
1=
2
C
d
to
L
a
N
N
O
N
I`
T
O
N
a
LL
c�
a
c�
O
�O
44
Packet Pg. 189
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 236 1h St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $900,000
Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary School
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an — 800' sidewalk on the south side of 236 th St. SW
from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary as well as the addition of sharrows along that stretch.
(This is only part of a stretch of Walkway project, which ranked #1 in the Long Walkway list in
the 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route near
Madrona Elementary School and along 236t" St. SW.
SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to start in Fall 2016 and be completed by Spring
2017. The project is funded through the Safe Routes to School Grant program, Fund 422 for
stormwater improvements, and REET funds for the pavement reconstruction.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$88,600
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$88,600
45
Packet Pg. 190
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 236 th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000
from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W
sr'sw
■
'232NPL 5�
]MRilllw.
■
� 1 �
�: �
F� ..
Jr
Jr
a
NEW
xyk�H:rL-sw ■
Ym 234TFiTST'SW=
■41
_
_ vmmI
T
`
235..H:Sr SW
ff
w
c�■r■
236TH - SW m � - f • . �
�..�
23GTH-57_S7WA'
L ,
■
I'
-2367HPCSw
1 ■
■ _
■
a
�
237TH PL SWNoll
a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236 nd St. SW from
Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$213,000
Construction
$1,182,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$213,000
$1,182,000
C
O
R
c
m
U)
4)
d
N
N
O
N
ti
0
^N
(L
LL
U
d
U
O�
t0
v
46
Packet Pg. 191
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84 1h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
From 238t" St. SW to 234t" ST. SW
aI°r n Sfi
PARH�
EDNpHDS +nrIRL
GALL
APTS
m
W
�_ LL Q
LL NORTH
CHRISTLUTHERAN CHURCH ,"',� HAVEN z�
MANOR w pC 0
ti � �
PART{ a 0
&RIDE AI R m
OFFICE U
H ST SW x}
236:1 4 i
2363 SAFEWAY $ d
23605 Wn L NJIHG R
23601 SUNSET N
23619 0 W (V
P 'n•1L LO'N 0
Q 6ROCK N
71, R AURORA I11-1 ti
S MARKETPLACE T-
T a O
N FA MILY PANCAKE cm
v 7-77 f1 LL
V
73$TH 5T 5W
7 SEOUL V
23821 PLAZA
=
23827 O7 I coo
Y TRAVEL LODGE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84 th Ave. W from 238 thSt .SW to 234 th St.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$495,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$90,000
$495,000
47
Packet Pg. 192
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 801Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,439,000
from 206t" St. SW to 212t" ST. SW
I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80t Ave. W from 206t St. SW to 212 th St.
SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized
transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: 2020-2022 (funding unsecured). A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grant to fund
the design phase was submitted in May 2016 (response scheduled for Spring 2017).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$210,000
Construction
$1,229,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$210,000
$1,229,000
48
Packet Pg. 193
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2" Ave. S Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
James St. to Main St.
4t
3�
<1 NG
4
IJ
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
2"d Ave. S between Main St.
2015 Transportation Plan).
Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100') on
and James St. (Ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: 2020
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$30,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
49
Packet Pg. 194
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,591,000
from Main St. to 200th St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200t St.
SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W,
adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #22 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood
Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized
transportation to walk to / from school.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2020 and construction in 2022 (funding unsecured).
A grant application through Safe Routes to School Program was submitted in May 2016 for
design funding (response scheduled for Spring 2017).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$230,000
Administration
Construction
$681,000
$680,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1
$230,000
$681,000
$680,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
50
Packet Pg. 195
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 95 1h PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000
2241" ST. SW to 220t" St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95 th PI. W from 224 th ST. SW to 220th ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #9 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2020 and construction in 2021 (funding unsecured).
A TIB grant application was submitted in August 2016 to fund this project (response scheduled
for November 2016).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2036
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$105,000
Construction
$445,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
$445,000
51
Packet Pg. 196
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 21 8thSt. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 76t" Ave. W to 84t" Ave. W
MENNEN
YEMEN
w.
�� i_ � ■�� _ IIIIIIL�
Tsoer' rsos ••x•
2
r
c�
c
i
a
NNO
Dj�
N�
r
O
a EVEx e
N
NE LT
CENT ER
^
I.Y
V
a
c�
co
T
�r
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218t St. SW from 76t Ave. W to 84 th Ave.
W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
52
Packet Pg. 197
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from 3r ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000
Ave. S to 4t" Ave. S
ARTS
W ENTER
a
Z UNDOW NEI
N
ALDER
ALDER ST
346
414 412 410
arking
5
5
LA
UJ
o SOUND VIEW
o:
HOWELL WAY
W
a
2
V
DAYTON ST
tMILLTOWN
MAPLE ST
FETRIC
ALDER ST
N
W
a FBECKWT'S
Z
BAN K
T-
409 530Pancak
407 540 Hau s
4003 546 0
401 w
a
WALNUT Sr
--F
GREGORY
e
H
525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on
Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4t" Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction
$95,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
c
2
d
N
L
IL
N
N
O
N
ti
T
O
N
IL
LL
c�
IL
c�
O
co
T
�r
53
Packet Pg. 198
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 216 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000
Hwy. 99 to 72"d Ave. W
7200
PARK & RIDE
7309
5TEVE N J
MAN oa
M1 2140
21407
21507
21511
� y
IL
0 211 52
M STEVEN
CO U RT
21527
216T
120
EVENS
FILION
��
21500
AEGIS
21600
KRUGER
CLINIC
210
B &M40
CONS
21410 2140$ 0.
21401 21412 r
21420
21431 MCDONALD'
Ln
Ilk
21558
VALUE
VILLAGE
216 TIl
{ 21619
*A�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216 th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to
72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #4 in the
Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000
Construction
$127,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$157,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
54
Packet Pg. 199
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.2.a
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $491,000
Hwy. 99 to SR-104
i
1
L
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #12 in Long Walkway list from 2015 Transportation Plan.
Install 5' sidewalk on the north side of 238t" St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating
safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76t" Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is underway and will be completed by early 2017. Construction
is scheduled for 2017. A TIB grant was secured to fund the design and construction phases.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$413,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$413,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
55
Packet Pg. 200
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 15 St. SW Walkway from 8 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $240,000
Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
813 495
/ _F 1440 m
f23 / r
( 8(5 811 98
vial M1 v 9111,
982
1439 807 809 1457 \ y
7
Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
a/ 5
9906 4832
226W
9826
9
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add missing sidewalk link along 15 St. SW from 8t Ave. S to 9t
Ave S
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and providing
pedestrian connection from 9th Ave. S.
SCHEDULE: The design phase will be completed in 2017.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000
Construction
$200,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$200,000
all or part of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts.
56
Packet Pg. 201
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $789,000
8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S
IR
4
�^
I
r.
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8t Ave. S to 9t Ave. S. This
project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (funding unsecured). A Safe Routes to School grant application was
submitted in May 2016 to fund the design and construction phases of this project (response
scheduled for Spring 2017.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$156,000
Construction
$633,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$156,000
$633,000
57
Packet Pg. 202
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Minor Sidewalk Program ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: varies
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete missing sidewalk along short segments throughout the
City.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: annual program
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$10,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
Construction
$60,000
$45,000
$45,000
$45,000
$45,000
$45,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$70,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
58
Packet Pg. 203
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000
from 80t" Ave. W to 76t" Ave. W
o�.
z
a
i r
192ND PL 5W
1�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76t Ave.,
with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$630,000
S
U)
a
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
d
LL
U
d
U
co
59
Packet Pg. 204
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 104 th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000
from 238t" St. SW to 106t" Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104 th Ave. W from 238t ST. SW to 106t
Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$840,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$990,000
60
Packet Pg. 205
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 218t" St. SW to 220t" St. SW
n
STEVE
Golden
,
HEAL
Leaves
i
EVENS
A K
—
LEGEND
WES1
x
ESTATES
ISLE
'
J
218TH ST SW
219TH ST SW
■
r m
16
i
' , d M1
-
Iti -
--- -----_220TH STSW_
—-------�T---------
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80t Ave. W from 218t ST. SW to 220t ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$55,000
Construction
$260,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
61
Packet Pg. 206
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84 1h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 188t" St. SW to 186t" St. SW
r`T rucq�
5■■
i i
.}
'■
��lWr
ri
186TH ST W
i
■-d6
OF-`
`
,7 ��
■
w
L
i
M—m mm m d r■
■
18 PH 5 5W
■
r
1
L A
F
■� �
188TH 5T 5W
r
L
I I
r
_ L
r
rr1Fr-
r
SFASAFW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84 th Ave. W from 188t St. SW to 186t St.
SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$60,000
Construction
$255,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
62
Packet Pg. 207
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 236 th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000
from Hwy 99 to 76t" Ave. W
■
PARK
& RIDE
236TH ST SW_
23607
23603 SAFEN
23605 � KJI
23607 NON
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236t St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76t Ave. W.
This project ranked #11 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$650,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$765,000
63
Packet Pg. 208
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238thSt. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000
from Hwy 99 to 76t" Ave. W
1
III PARIOHOS
r
JL
NA LN
'
,
■
'
APTS
•n•HIRL
BALL
•
1
Mr
r.
u
1
Ov
NORTH
m
CH RIST LH THE RAN CHURCH
PARK
S
N
& RIDE
� � R
-
2
TH T
OFFICE
r
23667
23663
23606
SAFEWAY �
23667
N4N
L HJIHG R
'
L • .
23619
O
SUNSET
'•A•1L LO•h:
P
Q
, BROOK
R AURORA
rotas
-
`
g MARKETPLACE
FA MILV PA NCAKE
r
H
V
.7-'
'
23$TH 5T 5W
■
"' seouL
■_
`
■ ■
e 23821 PLAZA
,♦ 1 ■ I I`1
' .
23827 �DG'
TRAVEL LOE
ST. FRANCIS
-MISISON TACOTIM MOTEL . . . - ■
WHSE ■
■ _+ K&EMOTEL ' 1 ■
AI, 1:11 RIl RIl III F 1 ■ ■ ■ ,
IN
■
E
r t
;,.�E
:yA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238t St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76t Ave. W
This project ranked #12 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$175,000
Construction
$995,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,170,000
64
Packet Pg. 209
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 80 Ave. W / 180" St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,350,000
SW Walkway from 188" St. SW to OVD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188 th St. SW to OVD. This
project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$270,000
Construction
$1,080,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,350,000
65
Packet Pg. 210
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 189thPI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
from 80t" Ave. W to 76t" Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189t PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76 th Ave.
W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2037
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2037
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$470,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$585,000
66
Packet Pg. 211
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000
Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle
storage for ferry users.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to
local driveways.
SCHEDULE: 2020 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$50,000
Construction
$307,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$357,000
67
Packet Pg. 212
6.2.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Trackside Warning System ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $350,000
@ Dayton and Main St. RR Crossing
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install Trackside Warning System @ Dayton and Main St.
Railroad Crossings.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce noise from train horns at both intersections.
SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to be completed by late 2016 or early 2017.
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$10,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
68
Packet Pg. 213
n
OM
U
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
M
N
M
N
iu
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
City of Edmonds
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Stormwater Projects
(2017-2022)
6.2.a
Project Name
Purpose
Grant Opportunity
Grant/Date
Current Project
Phase
(2017-2022)
Total Cost
2017
201
2019
2020
2021
2022
Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage
Add lift station and other new infrastructure to reduce
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Improvements.
intersection flooding.
Design
$0
(Federal or State unsecured)
$1,950,000
(DebUStormwater Fees)
$1,900,000
$50,000
$1,950,000
Total
$1,900,000
$50,000
Willow Creek/Daylighting
Daylight channel to allow better connnectivity with the Puget
RCO SRF Grant
$0
(Federal or State secured)
Sound to benefit fish and reduce flooding.
Possible Grant/TBD
Study
$4,200,000
(Federal or State unsecured)
$225,000
$225,000
$1,800,000
$1,950,000
$1,420,000
(DebUStormwater)
$75,000
$75,000
$600,000
$650,000
$20,(
$5,620,000
Total
$300,000
$300,000
$2,400,000
$2,600,000
$20,(
Perrinville Creek High Flow
Find solution to high peak stream flows caused by excessive
Ecology Grant
$510,375
(Federal or State secured)
$5101,375
Reduction/Management Project -
stormwater runoff that erodes the stream, causes flooding
Possible Grant/TBD
Design
$1,087,500
(Federal or State unsecured)
$337,500
$375000
$375000
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
and has negative impacts on aquatic habitat.
$582,625
(DebUStormwater Fees)
$170,125
$112,500
$125:000
$125:000
$50,(
$2,180,500
Total
$680,500
$450,000
$500,000
$500,1)
$50,(
Total CFP $9,750,500 Annual CFP Totals $2,880,500 1 $800,000 1 $2,900,000 1 $3,100,000 1 $0 $70,OOC
v
Revenue Summary by Year
Totals
Source
2017
1 2018
1 2019
2020
2021
2022
$510,375
Total Federal& State (Secured)
$510,375
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,287,500
Total Federal & State
(Unsecured)
$225,000
$562,500
$2,175,000
$2,325,000
$0
$3,952,625
Debt/ Stormwater Fees
$2,145,125
$237,500
$725,000
$775,000
$0
$70,(
Packet Pg. 216
M
N
iu
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.2.a
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St and Hwy 104 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,227,700
Drainage Improvements
�ZtG`
d�4 o°
9@
31
$p
200
GQ
!Tqk 1461
301
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add lift station in the Beach Place parking lot and other new
infrastructure.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To reduce flooding at the intersection of Dayton St and
State Hwy 104.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2019
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$100,000
Construction
$1,800,000
$50,000
1% for Art
$10,000
TOTAL
$1,900,000
$50,000
c
0
r
c�
c
m
N
L
a
N
N
O
N
ti
T
O
N
a
a_
V
a
CD
coo
T
�r
73
Packet Pg. 218
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Willow Creek Daylighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,825,000
Edmonds Marsh as seen from the viewing platform.
Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source:
www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-u /n aallery_php
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Building on the studies completed in 2013 and 2015 that assessed the
feasibility of daylighting the Willow Creek channel, this project will likely construct a new tide gate and
1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane. Funds will be used for
design and construction but exact breakdown cannot be assessed at this time.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The daylighting of Willow Creek will help reverse the negative
impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped in the early
1960s. This project will provide habitat for salmonids, including rearing of juvenile Chinook. This project,
along with its companion CIP projects "Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements" and "Dayton Street
Pump Station," will also help reduce the flooding problem at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton
Street.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$459,278
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$459,278
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
74
Packet Pg. 219
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.2.a
PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,532,950
Reduction/Management Project
Talhot
Frederick
a
C
n
m
1 4t
185th 0D
M
U
87th
cv 1
AQ7{L
172n
w
t 73 d �0
a
Perrinville d4
Creek th
78th
77th' 1
78th
-w
1 Oth m
181s
to
m a
�RRfL n n
t
Perrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision that
will be addressed by restoration.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A flow reduction study for the Perrinville Creek basin was
completed in 2014. This study recommended a number of flow control and water quality
projects to improve the conditions in Perrinville Creek. The City applied for and won a grant
from the Department of Ecology for $633,750 to design and construct a stormwater infiltration
facility in Seaview Park. The 2017 budget is for that facility. The dollars allocated in the out
years are to implement additional water quality and flow control projects in the Perrinville Creek
basin as recommended by the Flow Reduction Study.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased
flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low -gradient downstream
reaches of the creek. Before any habitat improvements can be implemented, the flows must be
controlled or these improvements will be washed away.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
COST
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$35,000
$50,000
50000
50000
$50,000
$50,000
Construction
$944,000
$400,000
$450,000
$450000
1% for Art
$3,950
$1,125
$1,250
$1,250
TOTAL
$982,950
$451,125
$501,250
$501,250
$50,000
$50,000
75
Packet Pg. 220
6.2.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2017-2022
ECM
0
x�p
Packet Pg. 221
CD
N
Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Draft CIP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
6.2.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2017-2022)
Table of Contents
GENERAL
016
Building
Maintenance
Public Works
7
112
Transportation
Public Works
9
125
Capital
Projects Fund
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
12
126
Special Capital /
Parks Acquisition
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
14
129
Special Projects
Parks & Recreation
16
132
Parks Construction
(Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
17
421
Water Projects
Public Works
19
422
Storm Projects
Public Works
20
423
Sewer Projects
Public Works
22
423.76
Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Public Works
24
PARKS — PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Capital
Parks & Recreation/
125
Projects Fund
Public Works
27
Special Capital /
Parks & Recreation/
126
Parks Acquisition
Public Works
61
Parks Construction
132
Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
64
Packet Pg. 223
CD
N
Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Draft CIP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
G�
z
U
N
Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Draft CIP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
n
00
CD
N
CD
N
Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Draft CIP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
6.2.b
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 016 - Buildina Maintenance
Proiects for 2017-2022
PROJECT NAME
CFP
2016
E
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
(20Total
2)
ADA Improvements- City Wide
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$20,000
Anderson Center Accessibility
$10,000
$5,000
$5,000
$20,000
Anderson Center Interior Painting
$20,000
$30,000
$50,000
Anderson Center Exterior Painting
$15,000
$15,000
Anderson Center Radiator Replacement
$25,000
$85,000
$110,000
Anderson Center Exterior Repairs
$75,000
$75,000
Anderson Center Exterior Flashing
$10,000
$5,000
$5,000
$20,000
Anderson Center Blinds
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$20,000
Anderson Center HVAC control install
$20,000
$5,000
$25,000
Anderson Center Steam Radiator Retrofits
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$20,000
Anderson Center Asbestos Abatement
$20,000
$20,000
$40,000
Anderson Center Flooring/Gym
$25,000
$25,000
$50,000
Anderson Center Countertop Replacement
$20,000
$20,000
$40,000
Anderson Center Carpeting
$7,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$37,000
Anderson Center Oil Tank Decommissioning
$30,000
$30,000
Anderson Center Elevator Replacement
$225,000
$225,000
Anderson Center Roof Replacement
$350,000
$25,000
$375,000
Cemetery Building Gutter Replacement
$8,000
$8,000
City Hall Carpet Replacement
$25,000
$50,000
$25,000
$75,000
City Hall Window Failed Window Seal Replacements
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$20,000
City Hall Elevator Replacement
$225,000
$225,000
City Hall Exterior Cleaning and Repainting
$85,000
$20,000
$105,000
City Hall Roof Repairs
$15,000
$100,000
$115,000
City Hall HVAC
$5,000
$5,000
$20,000
$20,000
$25,000
$25,000
$95,000
City Hall Security Measures
$5,000
$30,000
$10,000
$40,000
City Park Maint. Bldg. Roof
$25,000
$25,000
ESCO III Project
$0
ESCO IV Project
$0
ESCO _ Project
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$370,000
Fishing Pier Rehab
$1,870,650
$2,000
$2,000
Fire Station #16 Painting
$10,000
$10,000
Fire station #16 Generator
$43,000
$5,000
$48,000
Fire Station #16 Carpet
$20,000
$10,000
$30,000
Fire Station #16 HVAC Replacement
$30,000
$30,000
Fire Station #17 Ceiling repairs
$25,000
Fire Station #17 Carpet
$12,000
$12,000
Fire Station #17 Interior Painting
$15,000
$15,000
Fire Station #20 Carpet
$15,000
$15,000
Fire Station #20 Interior Painting
$10,000
$10,000
Fire Station #20 Stairs and Deck Replacement
$40,000
$40,000
Grandstand Exterior and Roof Repairs
$0
Library Plaza Appliance Replacement
$15,000
$5,000
$20,000
Library Plaza Brick Fagade Addition
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
Library Wood Trim
$10,000
$5,000
$15,000
Library West Deck Waterproofing and Garage Repair
$20,000
$5,000
$25,000
Meadowdale Clubhouse Roof Replacement
$50,000
$50,000
Meadowdale Flooring Replacement
$25,000
$25,000
Meadowdale Clubhouse Gutter Replacement
1
1 $15,000
$10,000
1
1
$10,000
1
Meadowdale Clubhouse Ext. Surface Cleaning
I
1
L
$5,000
1
1
$5,000
Meadowdale Clubhouse Flooring Replacement Partial
I
I
$15,000
$10,000
$10,000
1
1
$35,000
C
O
r
R
C
d
to
d
IL
N
N
O
N
ti
0
N
IL
ILL
ci
'a
-
01
t0
N
N
O
N
ti
0
N
a
v
w
L
0
N
t
K
W
C
G1
E
t
v
a
Packet Pg. 227
6.2.b
W
Meadowdale Clubhouse Fire Alarm Replacement
$25,000
$25,000
Misc. Fire Sprinkler System Repairs
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$15,000
$15,000
$60,000
Museum East Window Replacement
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$100,000
Museum Exterior Door Replacement
$5,000
$5,000
$10,000
City Wide Capital renewal
$300,000
$300,000
$350,000
$350,000
$400,000
$400,000
$2,100,000
Misc. / Unanticipated Buliding Maintenance
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$25,000
$20,000
$20,000
$10,000
$120,000
Public Safety/Fire Station #17 Soffit Installation
$4,000
$4,000
Public Safety Exterior Painting
$25,000
$25,000
Public Safety Council Chamber Carpet
$20,000
$5,000
$25,000
Public Safety HVAC Repairs & Maintenance
$10,000
$10,000
Public Works Failed Window Seal Replacement
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$15,000
Public Works Decant Improvements
$0
Senior Center Misc Repairs & Maintenance
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$40,000
Senior Center Siding/ Sealing (CDBG)
$0
Total Projects
$2,010,650 $907,000 $877,000 $1,040,000 $782,000 $1,090,000 $665,000 $5,361,000
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Beginning Cash Balance(January 1st
$52,400
$80,000
$75,000
$98,000
-$42,000
$76,000
-$114,000
Interest Earnings
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Contribution from Gen Fund #001 and other
$56,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
Contribution from REET Fund #126
$300,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
Contribution from REET Fund #125
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
Unsecured Funding
$0
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
WA Dept. of Ecology Grant
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
WDFW & RCO Grants for Fishing Pier Secured
$1,770,650
$2,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Reimbursement from 125 Fund for Fishing Pier
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Utility Grant Funding Estimated
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
WA State HCPF Grant Funding Secured
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Revenues
$1,979,050 $982,000 $975,000 $998,000 $858,000 $976,000 $786,000
Total Revenue
$1,979,050
$9$9082,000
$975,000
$998,000
$858,000
$976,000
$786,000
Total Project
($2,010,650)
7,000
($877,000)
($1,040,000)
($782,000)
($1,090,000)
($665,000)
Ending Cash Balance
I
I -$31,600
1 $75,0001
$98,000
-$42,000
$76,000
-$114,000
$121,000
Packet Pg. 228
6.2.b
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 112 - Transportation Projects Projects for 2017-2022
PROJECT NAME CFP E 2016 mate 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 (20Total 2)
Annual Street Preservation Program (Overlays, Chip Seals, Etc.
$1,162,764
$1,091,200
$1,420,000
$2,900,000
$2,060,000
$3,120,000
$2,350,000
$12,941,200
220th St. SW Overlay from 76th Ave W to 84th Ave W
$215,000
$10,000
$10,000
84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
$900,000
$900,000
Citywide - Signal Improvements
$325,000
$325,000
$650,000
Puget Dr. OVD Signal Upgrades
$75,000
$425,000
$500,000
Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave 238th St. SW
$750,000
$750,000
Main St. 3rd Signal Upgrades
$75,000
$300,000
$375,000
Safety / Capacity Analysis
212th St. SW / 84th Ave Five Corners Roundabout
X
$9,791
$0
228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements
X
$1,129,944
$25,000
$25,000
228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W
X
$75,000
$300,000
$375,000
76th Ave W 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
X
$376,051
$4,993,163
$100,000
$5,093,163
Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization
X
$300,000
$6,600,000
$6,000,000
$12,900,000
SR 524 196th St. SW / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements
X
$193,000
$175,000
$535,000
$903,000
Main St. 9th Ave.
X
$135,000
$776,000
$911,000
220th St SW 76th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements
X
$330,000
$1,800,000
$3,795,000
$5,925,000
Hwy 99 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements
X
$175,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
$2,806,000
Hwy. 99 216th St. SW Intersection Improvements
X
$164,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
$2,335,000
Hwy. 99 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
X
$175,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
$3,215,000
SR-104 226th St. SW / 15th St. SW Intersection Improvements
X
$30,000
$164,000
$194,000
SR-104 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements
X
$75,000
$420,000
$495,000
SR-104 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements
X
$200,000
$1,138,000
$1,338,000
Ci ide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
$20,000
$0
220'" St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination from Hwy 99 to 76`" Ave
$300,000
$300,000
Non -motorized transportation Projects
Sunset Ave Walkway from Bell St. to Cas ers St.
X
$2,000
$183,250
$2,595,000
$2,778,250
Dayton St. from 7th Ave. S to 8th Ave. S Walkway
X
$75,000
$75,000
232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. to SR-104
X
$200,000
$1,105,000
$1,305,000
238th St. SW from 100th Ave W to 104th Ave W
X
$455,661
$12,000
$12,000
236th St. SW from Edmonds Way / SR-104 to Madrona Elementary
X
$791,841
$88,600
$88,600
236th St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W
X
$213,000
$1,182,000
$1,395,000
84th Ave. W from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW
X
$90,000
$90,000
80th Ave. W from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
X
$210,000
$1,239,000
$1,449,000
2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St. Walkway
X
$30,0001
$30,000
218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
X
$200,000
$1,105,000
$1,305,000
Walnut St. from 3rd Ave. to 4th Ave. Walkway
X
$105,000
$105,000
216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W
X
$157,000
$157,000
238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy. 99
X
$67,000
$413,000
$413,000
Citywide Crossing Enhancement
$120,000
$940,000
$1,060,000
Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
X
$156,000
$633,000
$789,000
Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW Walkway
X
$230,000
$681,000
$680,000
$1,591,000
ADA Curb Rams Improvements
$25,000
$25,000
$50,000
$50,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,625,000
Audible Pedestrian Signals
$20,000
1
$20,000
95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
X
$105,000
$445,000
$550,000
15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave S
X
$50,535
$0
15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
X
$10,000
$30,000
$200,000
1 $230,000
Hwy 99 Enhancement Phase 3
$140,011
$8,000
1 $8,000
Minor Sidewalk Program
X
1 $40,000
$70,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$320,000
ADA Curb Ramps along3rd Ave S from Main St to Pine St
$512
$500
$500
Verdant Citywide Bicycle Improvements
1 $89,687
1 $652,5001
1 $652,500
Traffic Calming Projects
Traffic Calmin Program / non -motorized transportation safe $20,0001 $20,0001 $20,0001 $20,0001 $20,0001 $20,0001 $20,000 $120,000
Packet Pg. 229
O
Fer Projects
Fer Stora a Im rovements from Pine St. to Dayton St. X $357,000 $357,000
Traffic Planning Projects
Ci ide ADA Transition Plan $50,000 $60,000 $60,000
Trackside Warning Sys or Quiet Zone Dayton/Main St. RR Crossings X $333,280 $10,000 $10,000
Total Projects $4,989,077 $9,212,213 $1,640,000 $3,020,000 $9,810,000 $23,693,000 $22,162,000 $69,537,213
Debt Service on Loan (1) 220th St Design i $18,687 1 $18,5961 19,506 $18,415 $18,3251 18,325 $18,325
Debt Service on Loan 2 220th St Construction $22,023 $21,917 $21,811 $21,706 $21,494 $21,494 $21,494
Debt Service on Loan (3) 100th Ave Road Stabilization $34,525 $34,3611 $34,1961 $34,0321 $33,8681 $33,8681 $33,868
Total Debt
$75,235 $74,874 $75,513 $74,153 $73,687 $73,687 $73,687
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
Estimate
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Beginning Cash Balance
$9,000
$17,233
$163,030
$314,017
$479,864
$228,627
$99,940
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
P50,000
Multi -Modal Revenue
$50,000
$110,000
$110,000
$110,000
$110,000
$110,000
$110,000
Reimbursement - Fund 125 Annual Street Preservation Program
$186,000
$305,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
Reimbursement - Fund 126 Annual Street Preservation Program
$880,000
$786,200
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
Contribution - General Fund for Annual Street Preservation Program
$96,764
Reimbursement - Fund 126 220th St. SW Overlay from 76th to 84th
$29,025
$1,350
Reimbursement - Fund 126 84th Ave. W Overlay from 212th to 220th
$208,800
Reimbursement - Fund 423 for 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement
$150
Reimbursement - Mountlake Terrace for 228th St. SW Improvements(Overlay)
$3,725
Reimbursement - Fund 421 for 76th Ave W @ 212th St. Intersection Improvements
$6,690
$776,475
Reimbursement - Fund 422 for 76th Ave W @ 212th St. Intersection Improvements
$7,926
$450,528
Reimbursement - Fund 423 for 76th Ave W @ 212th St. Intersection Improvements
$4,866
$718,685
Reimbursement - Wave / Comcast for 76th Ave W @ 212th St. Intersection Improvements
$127,475
Reimbursement - Fund 126 for Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
$20,000
Reimbursement - Fund 126 for 220th St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination from Hwy. 99 to 76th
$47,000
Reimbursement - Fund 126 for Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization
$300,000
Reimbursement - Fund 421 for Sunset Ave. Walkway
$575,000
Reimbursement - Fund 423 for Sunset Ave. Walkway
$150,000
Reimbursement - Fund 422 for 238th St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W
$274,824
Reimbursement - PSE for 238th St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W
$55,159
Reimbursement - Fund 422 for 236th St. SW Walkway from SR-104 to Madrona School
$189,475
$25,000
Reimbursement - General Fund for pavement work in 236th St. SW Walkway
$250,270
Reimbursement - Fund 126 for 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
$10,000
Reimbursement - Fund 125 for 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
$30,000
Reimbursement - Fund 126 for Minor Sidewalk Program
$40,000
Reimbursement - Fund 125 for Minor Sidewalk Program
$70,000
Reimbursement - Fund 126 ADA Curb Ramp Improvements
$25,000
Reimbursement - Fund 125 ADA Curb Ramp Improvements
$25,000
Reimbursement - Fund 125 Audible Pedestrian Signals
$20,000
Reimbursement - Fund 125 - Hwy 99 Lighting (Phase 3)
$30,000
Reimbursement - Fund 126 for Traffic Calming Program
$20,000
$20,000
Reimbursement - Fund 126 for Citywide ADA Transition Plan
$50,000
$60,000
Reimbursement - General Fund for Trackside Warning System
$43,280
Reimbursement - Fund 126 Trackside Warning System
$290,000
$10,000
Reimbursement - Fund 422 (STORMWATER)
$0
Traffic Impact Fees
$150,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
Total Revenues
$2,872,154 $4,358,746 $1,223,030 $1,374,017 $2,264,864 $1,288,627 $1,159,940
Packet Pg. 230
6.2.b
Grants 2016-2022
2016
Estimate
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Federal for 220th St. SW Overlay from 76th Ave to 84th Ave
$185,975
$8,650
(Federal) for 84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
$691,200
Federal for 212th 84th Five Corners Roundabout
$3,949
(Federal) for 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
$838,514
$25,000
State for 228th St. SW Corridor Im rovements
$238,565
(Federal) for 76th Ave W @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
$141,587
$2,920,000
$86,500
State Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
(Federal) Sunset Ave. Walkway from Bell St. to Caspers St.
$1,730
$157,121
State for 238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy. 99
$55,520
$316,800
(State) 238th St. SW from 100th Ave W to 104th Ave W
$125,678
$12,000
State 15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave S
$44,588
(Federal) 236th St. SW from Edmonds Way / SR-104 to Madrona Elementary
$359,460
$50,600
Federal Hwy 99 Enhancement Phase 3
$110,011
$4,500
(Federal) ADA Curb Ramps along 3rd Ave. S from Main St. to Pine St.
§14127
Verdant Verdant Citywide Bicycle Improvements
$89:687
1 $652,500
Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Secured $2,209,391 $4,838,371 $86,500 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Grants 2016-2022 1 Estimate
Grants/ Loans Sought / Funding (not Secured)
Annual Street Preservation Program (Overlays, Chip Seals, Etc
$720,000
$1,300,000
$1,360,000
$1,420,000
$1,650,000
Annual Street Preservation Program Federal Funds Overla s, Chip Seals, Etc
$900,000
$1,000,000
Citywide Safety Improvements - Signal Cabinet
$325,000
$325,000
Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades
$75,000
$425,000
Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave W @ 238th St SW
$750,000
Main St @ 3rd Ave Signal Upgrades
$37,500
$300,000
228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W
$75,000
$300,000
Hwy. 99 Gateway / Revitalization
$1,600,000
$1,000,000
220' St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination from Hwy 99 to 76`" Ave
$253,000
196th St SW @ 88th Ave W - Intersection Improvements
$122,000
$87,500
$535,000
Main a 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements
$118,000
$776,000
76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
$285,450
$1,800,000
$3,795,000
Hwy 99 @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
$152,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
Hwy 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Improvements
$142,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
Hwy 99 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
$152,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
SR-104 @ 226th / 15th Intersection Improvements
$15,000
$164,000
SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements
$65,000
$420,000
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements
$173,000
$1,138,000
Sunset Ave Walkway from Bell St to Cas ers St
$1,870,000
Dayton St. Walkway from 7th to 8th Ave.
$37,500
232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-104
$100,000
$1,105,000
236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th PI. W
$106,500
$1,182,000
84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th to 234th
$90,000
80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th to 206th
$210,000
$1,239,000
218th St. SW Walkway from 76th to 84th
$200,000
$878,000
Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd to 4th
$105,000
216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 72nd Ave W
$137,000
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
$120,000
$940,000
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
$156,000
$633,000
15th St. SW Walkwa from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
$200,000
Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th
$230,000
$681,000
$680,000
ADA Curb Rams Improvements
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
$84,000
$325,000
Ferry Storage Improvements
1 $357.000
Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Sought / Funding (not secured) $0 $253,000 $720,000 $2,200,000 $7,847,450 $17,578,000 $16,165,000
Grant / Not Secured Funding Subtotal $2,209,391 $5,091,371 $806,500 $2,200,000 $7,847,450 $22,578,000 $21,165,000
Total Revenues & Grants
$5 081 545
$9 450 117
$2,029 530
$3 574 017
$10,112 314
$23 866 627
$22,324,940
Total Projects
$4 989 077
$9 212 213
$1,640,000
$3 020 000
$9,890,000
$23 693 000
$22,162,000
Total Debt
$75 235
$74 874
$75,513
$74153
$73,687
$73 687
$73,687
Ending Cash Balance
$17 233
$163 030
$314,017
$479 864
$228,6271
$99 940
$89,253
Packet Pg. 231
6.2.b
N
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 125 - Capital Projects Fund
Projects for 2017-2022
PROJECT NAME
CFP
E tomate
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
(20Total 2)
Park Development Projects*
Anderson Center Field / Court / Stage
$191,870
$5,000
$10,000
$5,000
$5,000
$25,000
Brackett's Landing Improvements
$50,000
$100,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$115,000
City Park Improvements
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$75,000
Civic Center Improvements/Grandstand demolition
X
$100,000
$5,000
$10,000
$10,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,125,000
Sunset Avenue Walkway
$0
Fishing Pier & Restrooms
$100,000
$75,000
$5,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$120,000
Community Garden
X
$0
$155,000
$155,000
Maplewood Park Improvements
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$15,000
Marina Beach Park Improvements
$100,000
$325,000
$500,000
$500,000
$5,000
$1,330,000
Mathay Ballinger Park
$0
$20,000
$5,000
$5,000
$30,000
Meadowdale Clubhouse Grounds
$75,000
$5,000
$5,000
$10,000
Meadowdale Pla ields
$0
$500,000
$500,000
Pine Ridge Park Improvements
$5,000
$5,000
$10,000
Seaview Park Improvements
$50,000
$10,000
$5,000
$65,000
Sierra Park Improvements
$70,000
$70,000
Waterfront Redevelopment / Waterfront Walkway Completion
X
$425,000
$425,000
Yost Park / Pool Improvements
$120,000
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
$245,000
Parklet development, 4th Ave cultural corridor
$10,000
$30,000
$40,000
$70,000
City Gateway replacements
$10,000
$30,000
$30,000
City Park Storage Building
$200,000
$200,000
Veteran's Plaza
$30,000
$30,000
Outdoor Fitness Zones
$0
$75,000
$75,000
Citvwide Park Improvements*
Citywide Beautification
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$126,000
Flower Pole Replacement
$0
$20,000
$20,000
Misc Paving
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$40,000
Citywide Park Improvements/Misc Small Projects
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$240,000
Sports Fields Upgrade / Playground Partnership
$20,000
$5,000
$25,000
$25,000
$55,000
S ecialized Projects*
A vatic Center Facility (dependent upon successful capital campaign) X $0
Trail Development*
Misc Unpaved Trail / Bike Path Improvements 1 $10,0001 1 $10,0001 1 1 $20,000
Planning
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility & Restoration
X
$32,150
$80,000
$30,000
$30,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$155,000
Edmonds Cemetery Mapping Project
$0
Civic Center Master Plan
$80,000
$20,000
$20,000
Waterfront Development / Waterfront Waiw-a-y
$25,000
$100,000
$100,000
Pine Ridge Park Forest Management Study
$40,000
$40,000
Total Parks Projects $895,020 $2,026,000 $746,000 $726,000 $746,000 $651,000 $641,000 $5,536,000
Packet Pg. 232
D..hlir W-4- P-i-f.
Pavement Preservation Program
$186,000
$305,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,555,000
Highway 99 Lighting Phase 3
$30,000
$0
Upgrade Curb Ramps to ADA Stds
$25,000
$25,000
Audible Pedestrian Signals
$20,000
$20,000
Minor Sidewalk Program
$100,000
$100,000
Building Maintenance
$0
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$500,000
Total Public Works Projects
Total Project Costs (Parks & Public Works)
Raimhursamanfs
$216,000 $450,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $2,200,000
$1,111,020 $2,476,000 $1,096,000 $1,076,000 $1,096,000 $1,001,000 $991,000 $7,736,000
Reimbursement to Park Fund 132 (Waterfront Redevelopment/Walkway Completion)
$525,000
Reimbursement to Park Fund 132 (Veteran's Plaza)
$30,000
Reimbursement to Park Fund 132 Outdoor Fitness Zones
$75,000
Reimburesement to Park Fund 132 City Park Storage rebuild
$200,000
Reimbursement to Park Fund 132 Civic Grandstand demo
$100,000
Reimbursement to Park Fund 132 (Dayton St Plaza
Reimbursement to Building Maintenance Fund 016(Fishing Pier
$100,000
Reimbursement to Park Fund 132(Community Garden
X
$155,000
Reimbursement to Street Fund 112 Pavement Preservation Pro ram
$186,000
$305,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
Reimbursement to Street Fund 112 (Highway 99 Lighting Phase 3
$30,000
Reimbursement to Street Fund 112 (Upgrade Curb Ramps to ADA Stds)
$25,000
Reimbursement to Street Fund 112 Audible Pedestrian Signals)
$20,000
Reimbursement to Street Fund 112 Minor Sidewalk Pro ram
$100,000
Reimbursement to Street Fund 016(Building Maintenance
$0
$100,0001
$100,0001
$100,0001
$100,000
$100,000
Total Reimbursements
w Total Projects & Reimbursements
$316,000 $1,535,000 $3501000 $3501000 $3501000 $3501000 $3501000
$1,427,020 $4,011,000 $1,446,000 $1,426,000 $1,446,000 $1,351,000 $1,341,000
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
Estimate
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Beginning Cash Balance(January 1st
$ 1,629,534
$ 1,865,814
$ 701,714
$ 818,414
$ 855,414
$ 772,914
$ 786,714
Real Estate Tax 1/4%
$ 1,335,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 1,100,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
Donations
Investment Interest
$ 12,300
$ 11,900
$ 12,700
$ 13,000
$ 13,500
$ 14,800
$ 14,000
Total Revenues $ 2,976,834 $ 3,177,714 $ 1,914,414 $ 1,931,414 $ 1,868,914 $ 1,787,714 $ 1,800,714
Total Revenue
1
1 $ 2,976,834
$ 3,177,714
$ 1,914,414
$ 1,931,414
$ 1,868,914
$ 1,787,714
$ 1,800,714
Total Projects
-$1,111,020
-$2,476,000
-$1,096,000
-$1,076,000
-$1,096,000
-$1,001,000
-$991,000
Endin Cash Balance
$ 1,865,814
$ 701,714
$ 818,414
$ 855,414
$ 772,914
$ 786,714
$ 809,714
*Projects in all categories may be eligible for 1%for art with the exception of planning projects.
C
O
r
R
w
C
d
N
d
L
d
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
IL
ILL
U
IL_
U
t71
tD
Packet Pg. 233
6.2.b
Capital Improvements Program
P.-i 19A . A...inl r-ifal/Pant. A-,iaifi-
P-i-fa f- qn1 Z9n99
PROJECT NAME
CFP
Estimate
lma
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Total
(2017-2022)
Debt Service on City Hall
$0
Debt Service Marina Bch/Library Roof
$83,228
$82,028
$80,828
$79,628
$83,428
$325,912
Debt Service on PSCC Purchase
$56,198
$60,298
$54,298
$53,398
$52,498
$138,725
$140,275
$499,492
Debt Service on FAC Seismic retrofit
$29,957
$29,621
$29,640
$29,630
$29,981
$29,887
$29,763
$178,522
Total Debt $169,383 $171,947 $164,766 $162,656 $165,907 $168,612 $170,038 $1,003,926
Parks Projects
Total Parks Projects $492,180 $275,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,275,000
P..hlir W-k. Prni-fc
Annual Street Preservation Program
$880,000
$995,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$3,245,000
220th St Overlay
$29,025
$1,350
$1,350
Trackside Warning System
$290,000
$10,000
$10,000
Signal Cabinet Upgrades
$70,000
$0
Upgrade Curb Ramps to ADA Stds
$25,000
$0
ADA Transition Plan
$50,000
$60,000
$66,000
Traffic Calming Program
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
Protective/Permissive Traffic Signal Conv
1
$20,00011
1
1
1
1
1 0
Minor Sidewalk Program
$50,000
$0
Hwy 99 Gateway/Revitalization (Access Management)
1
$300,000
$300,000
220th St Signal Coordination
1
1 $47,0001
1
1
1
1
1 $47,000
Building Maintenance
I 11
$300,0001
$200,0001
$200,0001
$200,0001
$200,0001
$200,0001
$1,300.000
Total Public Works Projects
Total Project Cost (Parks and Public Works)
RA-h..,-.nfs
$1,434,025 $1,733,350 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $4,983,350
$1,926,205 $2,008,350 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 $6,258,350
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for Annual Street Preservation Program
$880,000
$995,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000
$3,245,000
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for 220th St Overlay
$29,025
$1,350
$1,350
Reimbursement to Fund 132 for Land/Civic Acquisition
$492,180
$0
Reimbursement to Fund 132 for Waterfront Redevelopment
$75,000
$75,000
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for Trackside Warning System
$290,000
$10,000
$10,000
Reimbursement to Fund 111 for Signal Cabinet Upgrades
$70,000
$0
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for Upgrade Curb Ramps to ADA Stds
$25,000
$0
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for ADA Transition Plan
$50,000
$60,000
$60,000
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for Traffic Calming Program
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
Reimbursement to Fund 112 Protective/Permissive Traffic Signal Conv
$20,000
$0
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for Minor Sidewalk Program
$50,000
$0
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for SR99 Access Management
$300,006
$300,000
Reimbursement to Fund 112 for 220th St Signal Coordination
$47,000
Reimbursement to Fund 016 for Building Maintenance
$300,000
$200,000
$200,0001
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$1,300,000
Total Project & Reimbursements
$1,926,205 $1,808,350 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $5,011,350
I_
O
r
R
C
0)
N
Q)
L
(L
tV
N
O
N
ti
O
N
IL
LL
U
'a
ci
01
GO
Packet Pg. 234
6.2.b
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
Estimate
2017
2018
9114a
2020
ML2021
2
Beginning Cash Balance(January 1st
$2,239,006
$1,495,118
$629,221
$827,255
$926,199
$919,892
$912,880
Real estate Tax 1/4%/1 st Qtr %
$1,335,000
$1,300,000
$1,200,000
$1,100,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Interest Earnings
$16,700
$14,400
$12,800
$11,600
$9,600
$11,600
$11,000
Total Revenues $3,590,706 $2,809,518 $1,842,021 $1,938,855 $1,935,799 $1,931,492 $1,923,880
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Grants 2016-2022 Estimate
Grants/ Loans Souaht (not Secured)
Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Secured $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Revenue & Grants & Subsidy
$3,590,706
$2,809,518
$1,842,021
$1,938,855
$1,935,799
$1,931,492
$1,923,880
Total Debt
($169,383)
($171,947)
($164,766)
($162,656)
($165,907)
($168,612)
($170,038)
Total Project & Reimbursements
($1,926,205)
($2,008,350)
($850,000)
($850,000)
($850,000)
($850,000)
($850,000)
Ending Cash Balance
$1,495,118
$629,221
$827,255
$926,199
$919,892
$912,880
$903,842
to
Packet Pg. 235
6.2.b
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 129 - Special Projects
Projects for 2017-2022
PROJECT NAME
CFP
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
E
(20Total
2)
$0
Total Projects
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
Estimate
Beginning Balance(January 1st
$17,922
$17,922
$17,922
$17,922
$17,922
Investment Interest
Total Revenues $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $0 $0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Grants 2016-2022
Estimate
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Revenues & Grants
1
1 $17,922
$17,9221
$17,9221
$17,9221
$17,922
$0
$0
Total Construction Projects
1
1 $0
$0
1 $0
1 $0
1 $0
1 $0
$0
Ending Cash Balance
1
1 $17,922
$17,922
$1779221
$17,922
$177922
$0
$0
8
C
R
C
d
N
d
L-
a.
N
N
O
N
ti
0
N
IL
LL
ci
'a
ci
01
tO
Packet Pg. 236
6.2.b
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 132 - Parks Construction
Projects for 2017-2022
PROJECT NAME
CFP
2016
Estimate
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Total
(20 2)
4th Ave Corridor Enhancement
$1,425,000
$2,900,000
$4,325,000
Cultural Heritage Tour and Way -Finding Signage
$0
Dayton Street Plaza
$130,000
$30,000
$30,000
Civic Center Acquisition/Development/Stadium demo
$992,180
$135,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$3,135,000
Waterfront Redevelopment / Waterfront Walkway Completion
$25,000
$2,100,0001
1
$2,100,000
City Park Revitalization
$192,805
$0
Community Garden
$155,000
$155,000
Wetland Mitigation
$0
Edmonds Marsh/Daylighting Willow Creek/Marina Beach
$200,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$3,200,000
Fishing Pier Rehab
$0
Public Market (Downtown Waterfront)
X
$0
Outdoor Fitness Zones
1
$175,000
$175,000
City Park Maintenance Storage Building
1
1 $250,0001
1
1
$250,000
Veteran's Plaza
I
1
1 $550,0001
1
1
1 $550,000
Total Projects
$1,339,985 $3,595,000 $1,425,000 $4,400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $13,920,000
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
Estimate
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
022
Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)
$560,500
$1,422,185
$2,327,526
$2,527,526
$1,877,526
$1,577,526
$2,677,526
Beg Balance Park Impact Fees
$336,920
$815,855
Park Impact Fees
$478,935
$119,486
Beginning Cash Balance Milltown
Beginning Cash Balance Cultural Heritage Tour
Reimbursement from Fund 125 Waterfront development
$525,000
Reimbursement from Fund 126 for Waterfront development
$75,000
Park Impact Fees/Waterfront development
$500,000
Reimbursement from Fund 117-200 for Cultural Heritage Tour
Reimbursement from Fund 120 for Cultural Heritage Tour
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for City Park Storage Building
$200,000
Reimbursement from Fund 127-200 for Cultural Heritage Tour
Reimbursement from Fund 120 for Way -Finding Signage Grant Match
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for Outdoor Fitness Zones
$75,000
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for Veteran's Plaza
$30,000
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for Civic Demolition
$100,000
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for Community Garden
$155,000
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for Waterfront Redevelopment
$0
Reimbursement from Fund 126 for Civic Acquisition
$492,180
Contribution from 01 for Edmonds Marsh
$200,000
$200,000
$200,0001
$200,0001
$200,0001
$200,000
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for Marsh/Marina Beach
Reimbursement from Fund 125 for Fishing Pier
Investment Interest
$830
rotal Revenues
$2,069,365 $4,217,526 $2,527,526 $2,727,526 $2,077,526 $1,777,526 $2,677,526
Packet Pg. 237
6.2.b
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Grants 2016-2022 Estimate
Grants/ Loans (Secured)
4th Ave / Cultural Heritage Tour Preserve America/National Park Service
Dayton Street Plaza (Arts Fest. Found./Hubbard Trust/Ed in Bloom)
Interurban Trail (Federal CMAQ)
RCO City Park
$192,805
Fire Insurance City park storage
$50,000
RCO State grant /Civic Acquisition ( $1 M directly to escrow)
Snohomish County Tourism for Way -Finding
Conservation Futures/Civic Acquisition
$500,000
Wetland Mitigation
RCO/Civic Demolition
$35,000
Outdoor Fitness Zones grant
Veterans Plaza: various donations/grants
$520,000
RCO/Fishing Pier
Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Secured
Grants/ Loans Sought (not Secured)
$692,805 $605,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4th Ave Corridor Enhancement (state, federal, other)
$1,425,000
$2,900,000
Outdoor Fitness Zones
$100,000
RCO Waterfront Development ( Sr Ctr)
$1,000,000
Edmonds Marsh/Marina Beach
$650,000
$1,000,000
Veterans Plaza
Civic Development
$2,400,000
Bond funding/Civic
Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Sought (not secured)
Grants Subtotal
w
$0 $1,100,0001 $1,425,0001 $3,550,0001 $1,000,0001 $2,400,000 $0
$692,80511 $1,705,0001 $1,425,0001 $3,550,0001 $1,000,0001 $2,400,000 $0
Total Revenues & Cash Balances & Grants
$2,762,170
$5,922,5261
$3,952,526
$6,277,526
$3,077,526
$4,177,526
$2,677,526
Total Construction Projects
(1,339,985)
($3,595,000)
($1,425,000)
($4,400,000)
($1,500,000)
($1,500,000)
($1,500,000)
EndingCash Balance
$1,422,185
$2,327,5261
$2,527,526
$1,877,5261
$1,577,526
$2,677,526
$1,177,526
'Projects may be partially eligible for 1 % for Art
Packet Pg. 238
6.2.b
Z8
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 421 - Water Proiects
Proiects for 2017-2022
PROJECT NAME
CFP
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Esti16 mate
(20Total 2)
2015 Replacement Program
$634,176
$0
2016 Replacement Program
$1,416,688
$30,000
$30,000
2016 Waterline Overlays
$62,072
$0
Dayton Ave 3rd to 9th Utility Improvements
$327,000
$311,000
$311,000
2017 Replacement Program
$302,948
$2,288,815
$2,288,815
2017 Waterline Overlays
$210,000
$210,000
2018 Replacement Program
$400,000
$2,003,080
$2,403,080
2019 Replacement Program
$299,079
$2,200,664
$2,499,743
2020 Replacement Program
$328,580
$3,013,510
$3,342,090
2021 Replacement Program
$449,946
$3,134,050
$3,583,996
2022 Replacement Program
$467,944
$3,259,412
$3,727,356
2023 Replacement Program
$486,661
$486,661
Five Corners Reservoir Recoating
$114,41211
$1,885,588
1 $1,885,588
2016 Water System Plan Update
$144,50011
$4,0001
1
1
1
1
1 $4,000
Total Projects
Reimbursements & Contributions
$3,001,796 $5,129,403 $2,302,159 $2,529,244 $3,463,456 $3,601,994 $3,746,073 $20,772,329
Reimbursement to Street Fund 112 (228th Project) 1
$2
$0
Reimbursement to Street Fund 112 (212th & 76th Improvements)
$6,690
$776,815
$776,815
$0
Reimbursement to Fund 117 1 % Arts (2017 Watermain)
$0
Total Reimbursements
Total Water Projects
$6,692 $776,815 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $776,815
$3,008,488 $5,906,218 $2,302,159 $2,529,244 $3,463,456 $3,601,994 $3,746,073 $21,549,144
Revenues & Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
Estimate
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Beginning Balance (January 1st)
Connection Fee Proceeds
$301,400
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
Interfund Reimbursement from Fund 423 (Dayton 3rd to 9th)
$100,000
$100,000
Interfund Reimbursement from Fund 422 (Dayton 3rd to 9th)
$137,500
$100,000
2015 Bond
General Fund Fire Hydrant Improvements
$51,006
$70,000
$123,900
$128,856
$134,010
$139,370
Total Secured Revenue (Utility Funds, Grants Loans, misc) $589,906 $370,000 $223,900 $228,856 $234,010 $239,370 $100,000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Unsecured Revenue 2015-2021 Estimate
New revenue, grants, loans, bonds, interest, transfers
Total Unsecured Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Revenues
Total Projects & Reimbursements
Ending Cash Balance
IF
O
r
C
d
N
L
a
N
N
O
N
h
0
N
a
LL
U
a_
U
Packet Pg. 239
6.2.b
10
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 422 Storm Projects for 2017-2022
PROJECT NAME CFP 2016 2 17 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
Estimate (2017-2022)
SW Edmonds Basin Study Implementation Projects
105th & 106th Ave SW Drainage Improvement Project. 1 $654,7411 $2,0001 1 1 1 1 1$2,000
Edmonds Marsh Related Projects
Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements- Dayton St Pump Station
(See Note1)
X
$267,700
$1,900,000
$50,000
1
1
1
$1,950,000
Willow Cr - Final Feasibility Study / Design/Construction (See Note 1 and
Note 2)
X
$38,698
$459,278
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
"$300,000
$1,959,278
Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements
1
1
$200,000
$500,000
$50,000
$750,000
Willow Creek Pipe Rehabilitation
$82,500
$82,500
$550,000
$715,000
Northstream Projects
Northstream Culvert Abandonment South of Puget Dr - Assessment /
Stabilization 1 1 $36,595 $153,530 $153,530
Rehab/Re lace of Northstream Culvert under Puget Dr 113 215 $432,5601 $5,0001 1 1 $437,560
Perrinville Creek Basin Projects
Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects - Seaview Infiltration (See
Note1
X
$116,000
$979,000
$979,000
Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects (See Note 2)
X
1
$450,000
$500,000
$500,000
$50,000
$50,000
$1,550,000
Storm Drainage Im rovement Projects
Im rovements - 88th Ave W and 194th St SW
$4,195
1
1
1
1
1
$0
Improvements - Sierra PI- 12th Ave N to Olympic
1 $522,75111
$2,0001
1
1
1
1
1 $2,000
Annually Funded Projects
Ci -wide Draina a Replacement Projects
$306,900
$150,000
$2,050,000
$1,250,000
$1,800,000
$1,800,000
$1,872,000
$8,922,000
Lake Ballinger Associated Proiects
$17,000
4,0001
$66,0001
$68,0001
$68,0001
$70,0001
$70,000
$406,000
$0
Compliance -Related Projects
Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan (including asset
management Ian
$25,000
$195,000
1
1
1
$195,000
Total Project $2,102.795 $4.619.868 $3.503.500 $2.718.000 $2.668.000 $2.220.000 $2.292.000 $18.021.368
Packet Pg. 240
6.2.b
Estimate 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 (20Total 2)
Reimbursements
Tn 112 -Street Fund
SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 3 - Drainage portion of 238th SW
Sidewalk project (connect sumps on 238th St SW to Hickman Park
Infiltration System)
$362,053
$0
76th Ave W & 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
$7,926
$450,528
$450,528
236th SW Walkwav Project
$214,500
$0
UtilitV Replacements Da on btwn 3rd & 9th Ave
$137,500
$100,000
$100,000
$0
Total Reimbursements to 112 Fund $721.979 $550.528 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550.528
Tn 117 - Arte
105th & 106th Ave SW Drainage Improvement Project
$4,923
$0
City-wide Drainage Replacement Projects
$1,443
$500
$500
Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects - Seaview Infiltration
$3,950
$3,950
Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects
$1,125
$1,250
$1,250
$3,625
Edmonds Marsh/Shellabar er Cr/Willow Cr - Feasibility Study/Marsh
$0
76th Ave W & 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
$4,505
$4,505
Improvements - Sierra PI- 12th Ave N to Olympic
$3,598
$0
236th SW Walkwav Project
$1,150
$0
Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements- Dayton St Pump Station
$10,000
$10,000
Total Reimbursements to 117 Fund
Total Reimbursements
Total Project & Reimbursements
N
$11,114 $18,955 $1,125 $1,250 $1,250 $0 $0 $22,580
$733.093 $569.483 $1.125 $1.250 $1.250 $0 $0 $573.108
$2,835,888 $5,189,351 $3,504,625 $2,719,250 $2,669,250 $2,220,000 $2,292,000 $18,594,476
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
Estimate
is
3eginning Balance(January 1st
Proceeds of Long-term debt Bonds
Estimated Connection Fees (capital facilities charge)
$31,975
$30,000
$31,000
$32,000
$33,000
$34,000
$35,000
Grants (Secured) - Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr - Final
Feasibility Study/Marsh Restoration See Note 1
$31,500
$384,505
Grants (Secured) - Perrinville Creek Flow Management -Seaview Infiltration
See Note 1
X
$87,000
$546,750
Total Secured Revenues
$150,475 $961,255 $31,000 $32,000 $33,000 $34,000 $35,000
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Unsecured Revenue 2015-2021
Estimate
Proceeds of Long-term debt Bonds
Grants (Unsecured) - Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects (See
Note 2)
X
$337,500
$375,000
$375,000
$37,500
$37,500
Grants (Unsecured) - Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr-
Feasibility Study/Marsh Restoration See Note 2
X
$225,000
$225,000
$225,000
$225,000
$225,000
Grants (Unsecured) - Dayton St & Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements (See
Note 3)
X
$950,000
$25,000
Total Unsecured Revenues $0 $950,000 $587,500 $600,000 $600,000 $262,500 $262,500
Total Revenue
Total Project & Transfers
Ending Cash Balance
Notes:
1. All or part of this project funded bV secured grants or grants will be pursued, see Revenue section for details.
2 Assumes grant funding is 75 % of total project costs per year beginning 2018
3. Assumes grant funding is 50 % of total project costs per year beginning 2017
Packet Pg. 241
6.2.b
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 423 - Sewer Proiects
Proiects for2017-2022
PROJECT NAME
CFP
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022ima
Est
(2017-2022)
Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitations
$0
Sewer Main Replacement and CIPP
$0
$0
2015 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$88,000
$0
2016 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$1,520,362
$11,000
$11,000
2016 Sewerline Overlays
$217,250
$0
2017 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$245,750
$1,364,905
$1,364,905
2017 Sewerline Overlays
1
$220,000
$220,000
2018 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$287,113
$1,598,462
$1,885,575
2019 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$295,726
$1,646,416
$1,942,142
2020 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$304,598
$1,695,809
$2,000,406
2021 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$313,736
$1,746,683
$2,060,419
2022 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
$323,148
$1,816,550
$2,139,698
2023 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements
1 $336,074
1 $336,074
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation
$1,182,263
$312,0001
$424,360
1 $437,091
1 $450,204
1 $463,710
1 $482,258
1 $2,569,622
Infiltration & Inflow Study & Projects
Lift Station 1 Metering & Flow Stud $185,000 $0
N Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Stud $124,000 66,0001 1 1 1 1$166,000
N
Total Projects $3,562,625 $2,361,018 $2,318,548 $2,388,105 $2,459,748 $2,533,541 $2,634,882 $14,695,841
Reimbursements & Contributions
Reimbursement to Fund 421 (Dayton 3rd to 9th $100,000 $100,0001 1 1 1 1 1 $100,000
Reimbursement to Fund 112 228th Project $150 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0
Reimbursement to Fund 112 (212th & 76th Improvements) 1 1 $4,866 $718,6851 1 1 1 1 1 $718,685
Total Reimbursements $105,016 $818,685 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $818,685
Total Projects, Transfers & Reimbursements $3,667,641 $3,179,703 $2,318,548 $2,388,105 $2,459,748 $2,533,541 $2,634,882 $15,514,526
C
O
r
R
w
C
d
N
d
IL
N
N
0
N
ti
0
N
IL
LL
ci
a_
ci
01
coo
Packet Pg. 242
6.2.b
and Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
Estimate
2017
019
2020 2021Revenues
Be innin Balance Janua 1stSewer
Connection Fees
$310,200
$100,000j2E018
$100,000
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000
2015 Bond
Total Secured Revenue (Utility Funds, Grants Loans, misc) $310,200 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Unsecured Revenue 2016-2022
Estimate
New revenue, grants, loans, bonds, interest, transfers
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Unsecured Revenue
Total Revenues
Total Projects & Reimbursements
Ending Cash Balance
N
W
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Packet Pg. 243
6.2.b
N
Capital Improvements Program
Fiinrl d91 7R - Wnctownfor Trantmant Plant
Prniartc Mr 91317-9n99
PROJECT NAME
CFP
16
E 20mate
2
2019
2020
2021
2022
(20Total 2)
Repair and Replacement
$250,000
$250,000
$330,000
$330,000
$250,000
$1,410,000
Construction Projects - In House
$20,000
$20,000
$40,000
Construction Projects Contracted
$3,112,120
$2,125,000
$250,000
$250,000
$300,000
$600,000
$250,000
$3,775,000
Debt Service - Principle and Interest
$257,516
$256,163
$255,371
$255,929
$256,371
$256,902
$222,847
$1,503,583
Total Project
Projects less revenue from outside partnership
$3,369,636 $2,381,163 $755,371 $755,929 $906,371 $1,206,902 $722,847
$3,321,586 $2,346,113 $740,321 $740,879 $891,321 $1,191,852 $722,847
Revenues and Cash Balances 2016-2022
2016
stimate
2019
2020
2021
2022
Beginning Cash Balance(January 1st
$200,000
$200,000
-&�
$200,000
$550,000
$550,000
$550,000
$550,000
Intergovernmental
$3,321,586
$2,346,113
$740,321
$740,879
$891,321
$1,191,852
$722,847
Interest Earnings
$50
$50
$50
$50
$50
$50
Miscellaneous biosolids, Lynnwood, etc
$40,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
Grants, Incentives and Rebate for En e y Eff. Projects
$8,00011
$20,000
Subtotal $3,569,636 $2,581,163 $955,371 $1,305,929 $1,456,371 $1,756,902 $1,272,847
Total Revenue
$3,569,636
$2,581,163
$955,371
$1,305,929
$1,456,371
$1,756,902
$1,272,847
Total Project
($3,369,636)
($2,381,163)
($755,371)
($755,929)
($906,371)
($1,206,902)
($722,847)
Ending Cash Balance
1
$200,00011
$200,0001
$200,000
$550,0001
$550,000
$550,000
$550,000
Interest earned estimated at 0.75 % per year
Contribution breakdown by agency
2016
Estimate
2017 2
2019
20
20
Edmonds
50.79%
$1,686,934
$1,191,520 $375,987
$376,270
$452,675
$605,306
$367,112
Mountlake Terrace
23.17%
$769,744
$543,688 $171,562
$171,691
$206,555
$276,200
$167,513
OI m is View Water & Sewer District
16.55%
$549,756
$388,305 $122,531
$122,623
$147,523
$197,263
$119,638
Ronald Sewer District
9.49%
$315,152
$222,599 $70,242
$70,295
$84,569
$113,083
$68,584
TOTALS
1 100.00%
$3,321,586
$2,346,113 $740,321
$740,879
$891,321
$1,191,852
$722,847
*In 2019 per the agreement, fund balance will increase to $550,000.
C
O
r
R
C
d
N
d
L
(L
N
N
O
N
I-
T-
O
N
IL
LL
c)
'a
v
c)
V-
tO
n
Packet Pg. 244
N
CJl
Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Draft CIP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
n
00
CD
N
Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Draft CIP 2017-2022 (1619 : CIP/CFP 2017-2022 - Presentation)
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $25,000
Field/Court/Stage
700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities
and children's play equipment.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center
serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various
special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$5,000
$0
$5,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$5,000
$0
$5,000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
27
Packet Pg. 247
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Brackett's Landing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $115,000
Improvements
lo
South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound
North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park
South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park
through Deed -of -Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench
maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat
improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom
phased rehabilitation in 2018.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park,
regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$100,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$5,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$100,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$5,000
' all or part of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
IF
0
r
r
c
m
as
L
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
a-
LL
L)
a-
U
O�
28
Packet Pg. 248
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Improvements I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
City Park.
Continued pathway, access improvements and ongoing upgrades to
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Make ongoing upgrades to City Park as referenced in the
PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
$15,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts
29
Packet Pg. 249
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,325,000
Improvements / Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition. As part
of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the
stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some
grant funds available to assist with this.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$100,000
$5,000
$10,000
$10,000
$600,000
$600,000
TOTAL
$100,000
$5,000
$10,000
$10,000
$600,000
$600,000
30
Packet Pg. 250
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Avenue Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ See
Transportation CIP
dobw -0111111111",
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a multi -use path on the west side of Sunset Ave with
expansive views of the Puget Sound and the Olympic Mountains. The multi -use path will connect
the downtown business district, surrounding neighborhoods, water access points, and the
existing parks and trails system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This multi -use path has been a priority for the City of
Edmonds for several years. It is included in 5 different City plans, the Transportation
Improvement Plan, Non -Motorized Section; the Parks Recreation and Open Plan; the City
comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan; the Capital Improvement Plan; and the Shoreline
Master Program. Specifically, the Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan identified Sunset
Avenue Overlook priorities, namely improved connectivity and multi -modal access, complete the
bicycle and pedestrian route system, identify scenic routes and view areas, and landscape
improvements.
SCHEDULE:
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
31
Packet Pg. 251
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms I ESTIMATED COST: $120,000
LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re -tile and
renovate restroom facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and
enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$75,000
$5,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$5,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
32
Packet Pg. 252
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.2.b
PROJECT NAME: Community Garden ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000
}
ar r
1-
^ a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Locate and develop a community garden site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This was formerly planned for the Former Woodway HS
site. This is adopted as part of the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$155,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
33
Packet Pg. 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
Improvements
89t" Place West and 197t" Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and
natural trail system to Maplewood Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
34
Packet Pg. 254
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park ESTIMATED COST: $1,330,000
Improvements
South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with
federal transportation funds.
WWRC / IAC Acquisition Proiect; Protected throuqh Deed -of -Right RCW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
2018-2020.
Begin development of Master plan, daylighting Willow Creek in
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional
waterfront park system.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$325,000
$500,000
$500,000
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$325,000
$500,000
$500,000
$5,000
$0
x all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
35
Packet Pg. 255
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
781h Place W. & 241st St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$20,000
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$20,000
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
36
Packet Pg. 256
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
Grounds
6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and
landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation
that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care,
recreation classes and preschool activities.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
37
Packet Pg. 257
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Playfields I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with City of Lynnwood and Edmonds School District to
renovate Meadowdale Playfields..
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Partnership to leverage funds, renovate two multi use
athletic fields and softball fields. Increase field accessibility and use for Edmonds citizens.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
38
Packet Pg. 258
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
Improvements
83`d Avenue West and 2041" St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County
22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife
habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street
connecting to Yost Park. Forest Management Study in 2018
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional
trail connections.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
40000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
I $0
$400001
$5,000
1 $0
1 $5,000
1$0
New additions meet the 1 % for the Arts Ordinance requirements
39
Packet Pg. 259
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park ESTIMATED COST: $65,000
Improvements
801h Street West and 1861h Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed -
Of -Right
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Maintenance of
tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area. Replace roof on restrooms.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court,
parking and tennis courts.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$50,000
$0
$10,000
$0
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$50,000
$0
$10,000
$0
$5,000
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
40
Packet Pg. 260
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sierra Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $70,000
LACE LEA FJAPAN ESF MAPLE
{Acrr pol—lum di —cure)
ihlkderld unus shrub or t—Ts.melee [o Japan and Dore . l!
is urually many elemmed and Is lice moll ale.' end drllra, oS
all mopirs. Its leaves are 7 to a inches in t-Vh Mee flaeip cul
Inrn rhreadllke aryl ions. -cmf color .a Ott hp s'at" hui l6p
ues common colon ore hrlphi gmen and red, 'I hne lrres
harr a mnuaJeJ frm nlrh x'eeplhµ bra,chn. The, cmn he
In tubs and are erceueni for hommL
4 r
80`h Street West and 1911h Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improve pathways and interpretive braille signs. Field renovation
to include field drainage for turf repair.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, portable restroom facilities,
basketball hoops, parking and Braille interpretive trail for the blind.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$70,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$70,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
41
Packet Pg. 261
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $525,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
------------
A—
Propvwd Edmonds
Wam(from Garver
Arws;
-ycox ww •a u.v�
r ,o. yyr .wo r
r,ce w careha •••r+•• s+� w.ra.
swv. - •su •n•
-•
.
�H•WWIw��
r
M[YJf.W Rv.p
& t.R. �
rswq'i0°�"
C•�eou aewm bAv+�r.
U++d VM.y
M9gwed Tbrn pfl w
Ygn.Y.gron JN� b �..
� W ran p.ur� o
wipf..d Mc`+.{4 Pw�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic
Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
$100,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$425,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$525,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
42
Packet Pg. 262
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Yost Park / Pool ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $245,000
Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and
unanticipated repairs. Add in -pool play amenities. Park site improvements and repairs to trails
and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping, parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion
control. ADA improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for
environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
43
Packet Pg. 263
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Parklet Development, 4"' ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $70,000
Avenue Cultural Corridor
A parklet is a small urban park that is made by creating a sidewalk extension that provides
more space and amenities for people using the street. Usually parklets are installed on top of
parking lanes and use one or more parking spaces, but do not permanently impact the
underlying street. Parklets typically extend out from the sidewalk at the level of the sidewalk to
the width of the adjacent parking space creating a patio and seating area, often including
plantings. Parklets are public space and open to everyone.
10
A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop one or more parklets on the 4 th Avenue Cultural Corridor.
The first parklet will be created on 4t" Avenue adjacent to the ECA. The design will be
developed with Parks crew and an artist/landscape consultant.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide a small urban park along the 4 th Avenue Cultural
Corridor with views of Puget Sound and seating on a popular walking route. Parklets are a
resting and a gathering space and highlight the social function integral to streets. The
importance of additional small gathering spaces is referred to in both the Community Cultural
Plan and the PROS Plan.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$30,000
$0
$0
$40,000
$0
$0
TOTAL
$30,000
$0
$0
$40,000
$0
$0
44
Packet Pg. 264
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Gateway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
Replacements
(.
ot 1,
th
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Design and construct new gateway elements at SR 104 and 5
Ave. S and at Sunset and Main St. to replace aging and deteriorated signage.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The PROS Plan, Community Cultural Plan and Streetscape
Plan all refer to the importance of these visual "gateways" to the City of Edmonds. New signage
with artistic elements will enhance the gateways and reinforce Edmonds reputation as a cultural
destination for visitors.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Repairs &
Maintenance
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
45
Packet Pg. 265
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Storage Building � ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a new City Park Storage Building
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Construct a new City Park storage building to replace the
previous storage building which was destroyed by fire in 2016.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
46
Packet Pg. 266
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000
Veteran's Plaza
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The establishment of a Veteran's Plaza was unanimously
approved by the City Council in 2014. It will serve as a tribute to the patriotic and courageous
men and women who served this nation. The Plaza will reflect the bravery, sacrifice and
strength they gave our country. The design will accommodate flagpoles (in their existing
location), space for display of military seals and a Plaza, seating areas for reflection, some
educational monuments or placards, and existing hardscape and significant trees. The
address is 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 and is adjacent to the Edmonds Public
Safety Building.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Veteran's Plaza will serve as a focal point which
raises awareness of the contributions made by veterans and illustrates the high respect the
citizens of Edmonds have for the men and women who have defended the rights and
freedoms of this nation. It will provide a tribute for the men and women who have served and
are serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. The Plaza will establish a central site
for the citizens of Edmonds to conduct official observances, activities and ceremonies to honor
veterans including Veterans Day.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2021
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
-Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$30,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
x all or part of this Project may quality for I % for the Arts
47
Packet Pg. 267
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
48
Packet Pg. 268
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $126,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include Library, Senior Center, outdoor
plazas, City Park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree
plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide
comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
49
Packet Pg. 269
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Flower Pole Replacement I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $20,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed
throughout City.
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed
throughout City.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
50
Packet Pg. 270
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Paving I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 40,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Includes miscellaneous small paving and park walkway
improvements citywide.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Capital improvement needs citywide in park system.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$10,000
* all or a portion of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
2006 Miscellaneous Paving
51
Packet Pg. 271
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $240,000
Improvements / Misc Small Projects
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements
including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking
fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and
equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway
entrances into the city and 4t" Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the
Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities
and streetscape improvements in public areas.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering / Administration
Construction
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
52
Packet Pg. 272
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $55,000
Playground Partnerships
a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring
jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create
neighborhood park facilities at non -City facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create
additional facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$5,000
$25,000
$0
$25,000
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$5,000
$25,000
$0
$25,000
$0
$0
53
Packet Pg. 273
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 20,000
Trail / Bike Path Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the
goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the
comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to
meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path
improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with
engineering funding.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$0
$0
* all or part of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
54
Packet Pg. 274
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Cultural Arts Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $unk
Needs Study
- 4J
I Al
- .fir i• Y � LAJ
r ,.1
_ [R
J
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initiate feasibility study of providing and promoting Cultural / Arts
facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts facilities is a high
priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001 and in the 2008
update process.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for
public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority
creates the need to study performance, management and long term potential for arts related
facilities.
SCHEDULE:
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
55
Packet Pg. 275
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh Feasibility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000
& Restoration / Walkway
South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL
23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the
comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water
impacts. Continue to support daylighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Continue to
maintain current sidewalk / pathway/boardwalk. For 2018, a section of the boardwalk will be
replaced. Continue to work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, Earthcorps and others in the
rejuvenation and management of the marsh.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh
water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird
sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of design of daylighting Willow Creek
using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management
Plan, as well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
COST
Professional
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
Services
Construction
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$80,000
$30,000
$30,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
56
Packet Pg. 276
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Cemetery ESTIMATED COST: $ 100,000
Mapping
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Memorial Cemetery was deeded to the City in 1982.
The City has been operating the cemetery with no markings, rows, aisles, or surveyed
mapping. It is essential that the City survey/map/and mark the cemetery so as to effectively
manage the plots.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Operations of a public cemetery, with effective and
accurate stewardship.
SCHEDULE: 2015-2021
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
$100,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
57
Packet Pg. 277
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Master Plan � ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $20,000
V
6t" Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Civic property was purchased from the Edmonds School
District in 2016. A Master Plan process is underway to develop a long term plan for the
property.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To determine the best use and future plans for
redevelopment at Civic Center.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/StudyPlanning/Study
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
IF
2
c
m
a�
d
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
d
LL
L)
d
U
rn
m
58
Packet Pg. 278
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $525,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
------------
A—
Propvwd Edmonds
Wam(from Garver
Arws;
-ycox ww •a u.v�
r ,o. yyr .wo r
r,ce w careha •••r+•• s+� w.ra.
swv. - •su •n•
-•
.
�H•WWIw��
r
M[YJf.W Rv.p
& t.R. �
rswq'i0°�"
C•�eou aewm bAv+�r.
U++d VM.y
M9gwed Tbrn pfl w
Ygn.Y.gron JN� b �..
� W ran p.ur� o
wipf..d Mc`+.{4 Pw�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic
Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
$100,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$425,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$525,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
59
Packet Pg. 279
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
Improvements
83`d Avenue West and 2041" St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County
22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife
habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street
connecting to Yost Park. Forest Management Study in 2018
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional
trail connections.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
40000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
I $0
$400001
$5,000
1 $0
1 $5,000
1$0
New additions meet the 1 % for the Arts Ordinance requirements
60
Packet Pg. 280
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.2.b
PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,003,926
Capital Projects and Acquisitions
F.--
� RL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on:
Marina Beach / Library Roof: $82,028
PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $60,298
Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $29,621
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
Principal &
Interest
$171,947
$164,766
$162,656
$165,907
$168,612
$170,038
TOTAL
$171,947
$164,766
$162,656
$165,907
$168,612
$170,038
" all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
C
2
a+
fC
a+
C
d
N
N
L
N
N
O
N
ti
O
N
d
LL
L)
d
U
rn
m
61
Packet Pg. 281
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,200,000
Space / Land
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens that
fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open
space.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
$2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Land
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200000
62
Packet Pg. 282
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.2.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
G � VOW
rti
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Redevelop waterfront to secure access to Puget Sound for public
use as indentified in the Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public ownership of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
63
Packet Pg. 283
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 4" Avenue ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,325,000
Corridor Enhancement
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Begin 4 th Avenue site development with temporary and/or moveable
surface elements and amenities to begin drawing attention and interest to the corridor and create
stronger visual connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Possible
projects may include surface art, interpretive signage and wayfinding, or low level lighting.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4t" Ave. Improvements will
enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the
downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center for
the Arts. Timing for 30% design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will
assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the total project
implementation phase.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$1,425,000
$2,900,000
$0
$0
$1
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$1,425,000
$2,900,000
$0
$0
$1
" all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
64
Packet Pg. 284
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Cultural Heritage Tour and ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: TBD
Way -Finding Signage
:191Al0]►10I•y9I91►i►Ii1(GAT1►[ato1MtoI1k; 0 G : I : I:]IETC Iatell] V
(Proposed sites)
N
2
2'r qS
ti y
�
a
Q a s
F
Z
2 ® 5pr�yne 5[
�
e
p2
A i
V ® y
?
s
® D
I
C
Oa[t. 5[
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a downtown Edmonds walking tour highlighting a dozen historic
sites with artist made interpretive markers, and add way -finding signage for the downtown area.
Completed.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Promote tourism and economic development in the core
downtown. The walking tour and interpretive signage focuses on local history and as unique artist
made pieces also reflect the arts orientation of the community. Improved way -finding signage which
points out major attractions and services/amenities such as theaters, museums, beaches, train station,
shopping, dining and lodging promotes both tourism and economic vitality in the downtown /waterfront
activity center.
SCHEDULE: 2015-2021
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering & Administration
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
65
Packet Pg. 285
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Dayton Street Plaza ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Renovate small park and plaza at north end of old public works
building, 2nd & Dayton Street. Improve landscaping, plaza, and accessibility.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Capital improvements to public gathering space and
creation of additional art amenities and streetscape improvements in downtown on main
walking route. Financial support from Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, Hubbard Foundation
and Edmonds in Bloom.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
66
Packet Pg. 286
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,135,000
/ Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition
of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has
some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park
at this site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant
funds applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$135,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
TOTAL
$135,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
67
Packet Pg. 287
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,100,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
------------
A—
Propvwd Edmonds
Waterfront Genrer
ArUS;
-ycox ww •a u.v�
r ,o. yyr .wo r
r,ce w careha •••r+•• s+� w.ra.
swv. - •su •n•
f
-•
.
�H•WWIw��
r
M[YJf.W Rv.p
& t.R. �
rswq'i0°�"
C•�eou aewm bAv+�r.
U++d VM.y
�}�
k.myWa�wrmfL.'.
M9gwed Tbrn pfl w
Ygn.Y.gron JN� b �..
� W ran p.ur� o
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic
Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$100,000
Construction
$2,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$2,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
68
Packet Pg. 288
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.2.b
PROJECT NAME: Community Garden ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000
}
ar r
1-
^ a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Locate and develop a community garden site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This was formerly planned for the Former Woodway HS
site. This is adopted as part of the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$155,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
69
Packet Pg. 289
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Wetland Mitigation I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: TBD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive
management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to
support day -lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation
of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the
Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the
marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and freshwater
marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary.
Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as
defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available
through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2015-2021
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
70
Packet Pg. 290
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.2.b
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh / Willow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,200,000
Creek Daylighting
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive
management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to
support day -lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation
of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the
Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the
marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water
marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary.
Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as
defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available
through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2015-2021
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$200,000
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1 $200,000
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$0
$0
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
71
Packet Pg. 291
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
Waterfront)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public
market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community
gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a
valuable asset to Edmonds.
SCHEDULE:
This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners
willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished
by 2017.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022-2027
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.72 Packet Pg. 292
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$175,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$175,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
73
Packet Pg. 293
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Storage Building � ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a new City Park Storage Building
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Construct a new City Park storage building to replace the
previous storage building which was destroyed by fire in 2016.
SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Construction
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
74
Packet Pg. 294
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000
Veteran's Plaza
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The establishment of a Veteran's Plaza was unanimously
approved by the City Council in 2014. It will serve as a tribute to the patriotic and courageous
men and women who served this nation. The Plaza will reflect the bravery, sacrifice and
strength they gave our country. The design will accommodate flagpoles (in their existing
location), space for display of military seals and a Plaza, seating areas for reflection, some
educational monuments or placards, and existing hardscape and significant trees. The
address is 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 and is adjacent to the Edmonds Public
Safety Building.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Veteran's Plaza will serve as a focal point which
raises awareness of the contributions made by veterans and illustrates the high respect the
citizens of Edmonds have for the men and women who have defended the rights and
freedoms of this nation. It will provide a tribute for the men and women who have served and
are serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. The Plaza will establish a central site
for the citizens of Edmonds to conduct official observances, activities and ceremonies to honor
veterans including Veterans Day.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2021
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Planning/Study
-Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$550,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$550,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
x all or part of this Project may quality for I % for the Arts
75
Packet Pg. 295
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2016 TO 2017)
6.2.c
ADDED PROJECTS
FUND I PROJECT NAME I CFP I DESCRIPTION
112
84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
Complete overlay along 84th Ave. W from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
112
220th St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
Improve traffic flow along 220th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W with the
installation of coordination system
112
236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
X
Improve pedestrian safety along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
112
238th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
X
Improve pedestrian safety along 238th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
112
80th Ave. W / 180th St. SW Walkway from 188th St. SW to OVD
X
Improve pedestrian safety along 80th / 180th St. SW from 188th St. SW to OVD
112
189th PI. W Walkway from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave W
X
Improve pedestrian safety along 89th Pl. W from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
112
15th St. SW Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
X
Improve pedestrian safety along 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
112
Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW
X
Improve pedestrian safety along Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW
112
95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
X
Improve pedestrian safety along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
112
Citywide Crossing Enhancement
Improve safety at various pedestrian crossings throughout the City
016
Museum exterior door replacements
Replace non -historic doors to comply with historic registry specifications
016
Museum East window replacement
double hung sash approved by State Historic Architect
016
Library West deck water seal and repair parking ceiling
Waterproof deck and repair pan -deck ceiling at covered parking
016
FAC metal flashing replacement and repair
Remove and replace failed metal flashing as needed to eliminate water intrusion
016
PW replace failed insulated window units
Replace glazing at failed window units
016
CH replace failed insulated window units
Replace glazing at failed window units
016
FAC add building controls to both boiler systems
Add Alerton building controls to existing boilers
016
FAC steam radiator retrofits
Retrofit steam radiators as needed to replace abandoned or leaking radiators
016
Exterior building washing, sealing and painting
Wash seal and paint building exteriors
016
Replace carpeting and flooring
Replace warn carpeting and flooring as necessary
016
CH electrical infastructure survey and replacement
Survey and replace electrical infastructure at CH, phase 1 of 5
016
Clean and maintenance City facility roofs
Cleand inspect and maintain roofs of all City Facilities
016
CH Planned maintenance and replacemnet of HVAC
Replace failed HVAC unit and maintain all existing end of life HVAC infastructure.
Yearly program
016
Retro comission City building
Retro Commission a City building to bring HVAC operation to engineered
specifications and optimize DDC system and energy performance.
016
CH heat tape installation
Add freeze protection to uninsulated vulnerable water pipes
016
Museum structural analysis of upper fagade
Analysis of upper fagade structrure since previous stop gap repair measure
016
Failed sash and glazing replacement
Replace failed window sash and glazing at various non -historic locations
016
MCH replace damaged and warn flooring at kitchen and entry
Replace existing damaged and warn flooring at Kitchen and entry
N
N
0
N
ti
0
N
a
a
U
a
v
rn
coo
C
O
N
�L
ca
E
O
U
a_
U
a
U_
U
.r
a
Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 296
125
Civic Center Grand stand removal
x
Consistent with Civic planning process, master plan
125
Community Garden
Consistent with PROS plan.
125
City Park Storage buidling
Replacement from fire.
125
Waterfront Redevelopment/Walkway completion
Consistent with PROS plan.
125
Upgrade Curb Ramps to ADA Stds
2017 Project budget will be funded by REET 2 revenue.
125
Audible Pedestrian Signals
2017 Project budget will be funded by REET 2 revenue.
125
Minor Sidewalk Program
2017 Project budget will be funded by REET 2 revenue.
126 Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization (Access Management) 1 12017 Project budget will be funded by REET 1 revenue.
126 220th St. Signal Coordination 1 12017 Project budget will be funded by REET 1 revenue.
132
Civic Stadium Demolition
Consistent with PROS plan, master plan
132
Waterfront Revel opment/Walkway Completion
Consistient with PROS plan
132
Community Garden
Consistent with PROS plan.
132
City Park Storage buidling
Replacement from fire.
421 2023 Replacement Program Estimated future costs for waterline replacements.
421 2017 Waterline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements.
423 2023 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements/rehab/impr.
423 2017 Sewerline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewerline repl/rehab/impr.
6.2.c
Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 297
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2016 TO 2017)
6.2.c
DELETED PROJECTS
I
CFP
I
DESCRIPTION
FUND
PROJECT NAME
112
Five Corners Roundabout
X
Completed in 2016
112
Arterial Street Signal Coordination
Identified as 220th St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W.
112
Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
Completed in 2016
112
Type 2 Pavement Markers
Project to be addressed as part of future overlay projects
112
15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave. S
X
Completed in 2016
112
Transportation Plan Update
Completed in 2015
112
SR-104 Transportation Corridor Study
lCompleted in 2015
112
Traffic Calming Program
X
I Non -growth related project
113 Multimodal Transportation Fund X Fund Deleted per City Council action on October 18, 2016
016
Council/Court Chamber AV upgrade
Audio Visual upgrade project
016
MCH gutter replacement
Replacement of rain gutters
016
Estimate of CH security needs
Estimate and survey of necessary security upgrades
016
FAC spot flooring replacement in Beach Ranger office
Replace carpeting at Ranger offices
016
FS16 Generator replacement
Replace emergency generator at FS
421 2014 Replacement Program I lCompleted in 2015.
421 2015 Waterline Overlays I lComoleted in 2015.
422
Improvements - Dayton 3rd to 9th
This project was combined with the waterline/sewerline project that covers that
same area.
422
Storm System Video Assessment
Deleted. This project will be covered as part of operations and maintenance.
Operations and maintenance will do this work as part of their operations and
maintenance tasks.
423
2015 Sewerline Overlays
Completed in 2015.
423
Lift Stations 3,4,5,9,10,11,12,14,15
Completed in 2015.
423
Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Completed in 2015.
423
Phase 2 Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Completed in 2015.
Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 298
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2016 TO 2017)
6.2.c
CHANGED PROJECTS
FUND PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE
016 1
CH security upgrades SecurityUpgrades on hold until recommendations and estimate arrive.
423.76
Repair and Replacement
The Secondary Clarifier #3 Structural Repair contract was awarded in 2016. The
contractor will not be able to complete the work by the Oct. 2016 so the project
may need to be extended. Pagoda repairs have been placed on hold for time
being.
423.76
Upgrades
Offsite Flow Telemetry project was completed in 2016. The Control System
Upgrade will replace aging control system equipment, provide for redundancy and
upgrade the operating platform. The 600 PLC is the final element and is
scheduled for spring 2017. The project completion was pushed back in order to
coordinate work with Phase 5 Energy Project. The SSI project is on hold awaiting
EPA approval to install and test the mercury modules. We continue to report
compliance status on a monthly basis. The Phase 4 energy improvement project
is in close out. The Phase 5 Energy Improvement project has been started. By the
end of 2016 the solids conveyor and sludge hopper should be upgraded and the
new 126 HP blower has been installed. The project has given us the opportunity
Ito optimize the aeration control system.
423.76
Studies and Consulting
In the future we will be to study Peracetic Acid disinfection however this may put
off until 2018.
Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 299
6.2.d
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
September 28, 2016
Chair Lovell called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety
Complex, 250 — 5`' Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Philip Lovell, Chair
Carreen Rubenkonig, Vice Chair
Matthew Cheung
Alicia Crank
Nathan Monroe
Valerie Stewart
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Todd Cloutier (excused)
Daniel Robles (excused)
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director
Jerry Bevington, Video Recorder
Karin Noyes, Recorder
BOARD MEMBER STEWART MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 BE APPROVED AS
CORRECTED. BOARD MEMBER MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
There was no one in the audience.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD
Chair Lovell referred to Page 3, which contains a brief update on the Waterfront Access Study. He clarified that a second
public meeting was recently held, and his understanding is that the Task Force will be making a recommendation to the City
Council via Mayor Earling sometime in October.
PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2017-2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
Mr. English started his presentation by providing a diagram to illustrate the components of the CIP and CFP, particularly
noting differences between the two documents and where they overlap. He explained that both plans identify the six -year
capital projects with funding sources, but the CIP also identifies six -year maintenance projects with funding sources and the
Packet Pg. 300
CFP identifies long-range (20 year) capital project needs. The CFP is divided into three project sections: General (parks,
buildings and regional projects), Transportation (safety/capacity and pedestrian bicycle projects), and Utilities. The CIP is
organized based on the City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the six -
year period. He summarized that the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, linking those
projects to the various City funds and revenues, and the CFP is intended to identify longer -term capital needs (not
maintenance) and be tied to City level -of -service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with other elements of
the Comprehensive Plan, (i.e. transportation, parks, etc.), and there are restrictions on how often a CFP can be amended.
There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. He reviewed each of the funds as follows:
• Fund 112 — Transportation. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 116 — Building Maintenance. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 125 — Capital Projects. This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation and Public Works Departments.
Money for this fund comes from the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET), and the dollars are split between the two
departments.
• Fund 126 — Special Capital/Park Acquisition. This fund is supported by REET funds and is managed by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
• Fund 129 — Special Projects. This fund is currently idle and was last used for the Highway 99 International District
Lighting Project that was completed a few years ago. Any new capital project would program into this fund.
• Fund 132 — Parks Construction (Grant Funding). This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department.
• Fund 421— Water Projects. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 422 — Storm Projects. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 423 — Waste Water Treatment Plant. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department.
Next, Mr. English recapped some of the larger projects that have been completed or the City is working towards completion
of in 2016:
• The 228`h Street Corridor Improvement Project started in May of 2015 and reached substantial completion in March of
2016. The project included a new signalized intersection that connects 2281h Street east to west across Highway 99 and
into Mountlake Terrace, providing a new east/west connection to Interstate 5.
• Safety improvements were completed with a median down Highway 99 to eliminate the left turns from south bound
Highway 99 to 76`h Avenue West. This should help reduce accidents and provide safety turning movements.
• A sidewalk improvement project on 238th Street between 100th and 104`h Streets was completed via a Safe Routes to
Schools Grant. Stormwater funds were used to improve drainage, including bio-retention rain gardens in key locations.
The street was also overlaid using funds from the Pavement Restoration Program.
• Sewer mains were replaced on Walnut Street, and the project also included new pavement via the Pavement Restoration
Program.
• On September 271h, the City Council approved a contract for a project on the south side of 2361h Street between SR-104
and Madrona School. The project will include a new sidewalk, with a five-foot path to cross over to school, and curbs
and gutters will also be installed. The pavement is in poor condition, so the roadway will be rebuilt. The project will
include stormwater and water main work, as well. The City is coordinating with the School District's plan to rebuild the
school starting in 2017 to provide a sidewalk leading into the school property.
• As part of the Pavement Preservation Program, 9.6 lane miles of roadway were repaved, and pedestrian curb ramp
upgrades were completed.
• REET dollars (125 and 126 Funds) were used to fund the 2016 Pavement Preservation Program, single cabinet upgrades,
traffic calming program, curb ramp upgrades, and an ADA transition plan update.
Mr. English reviewed the projects that will be funded in 2017 via the 112 Fund as follows:
Planning Board Minutes
September 28, 2016 Page 2
Packet Pg. 301
6.2.d
The 76th Avenue West and 212th Street Intersection Improvement Project was bid out in May. However, given the
bidding climate, the bids came in much higher than the engineer's estimate. Only two bids were received and both were
high. The City elected to reject both bids and rebid the project during the winter months. That means the project would
likely start in the spring of 2017. In the meantime, the City has applied for additional grant funding from the
Transportation Improvement Board, but won't know the outcome of the application until November. This large project
will add capacity to the intersection and underground utilities.
Chair Lovell pointed out that the project is identified in the CIP as being unfunded at this time. Mr. English said the City
has secured federal funding for the project, and has applied for additional grant funding, as well. Chair Lovell referred to
the spreadsheet on Page 9 and said it is unclear how much grant funding has been secured in 2016 and how much needs
to be secured in 2017. Mr. English agreed to revisit the numbers and update them accordingly. He suggested that
perhaps the labels needed to be corrected to more clearly reflect the intent. He said that in addition to grant funding for
the project, additional funding will come from the water and storm utility funds, since infrastructure needs to be replaced
in the intersection prior to pavement work being done.
• Citywide bicycle improvements will continue in 2017. For example, a striping project will occur on 76th Avenue West to
add bicycle lanes and change a four -lane facility into a 3-lane facility. This project will likely be bid in conjunction with
the intersection improvements to get some economy.
• The 238th Street Walkway Project from SR-104 to SR-99 will also be completed in 2017. The City received a grant from
the State Transportation Improvement Board and design work has been started.
• The City received federal funding to move forward with an overlay of 84th Avenue from 200th Street to 212th Street
during the summer of 2017.
• REET dollars will be used to install Trackside Warning Systems at Main and Dayton Streets to reduce the sound
footprint that the current train horns have. The warning systems will be permanently installed at the intersections, and
the horns will blow whenever a train is passing through Edmonds in either direction. The noise from the horns will be
more focused at the intersections so there will be less impact to surrounding properties.
Mr. English summarized that the Water Utility Fund (421) supported the replacement of 4,850 feet of water main in 2016,
and 3,400 feet of street affected by waterline replacements was overlaid. In 2017 it is anticipated that 7,300 feet of water
main will be replaced and 8,200 feet of street affected by waterline replacement will be overlaid.
Mr. English also reviewed that the Stormwater Utility Fund (422) supported the 238th Street drainage improvements that were
completed in 2016, as well as the new pipe and infiltration gallery in southwest Edmonds between 106th and 105th Street.
The 2017 projects include the Seaview infiltration project, further design of the Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh project, an
update of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan, and installation of the Dayton Street Pump Station. He explained that the
Seaview project is funded via a grant and will help reduce the number of surges from stormwater flowing into Perrinville
Creek. The Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh project is ongoing, and it is anticipated that final design work and permitting can
move forward in 2017. He explained that during heavy rain events and high tide, the intersection at Dayton Street and SR-
104 floods. Given its proximity to the marsh, Willow Creek, the outfall, and the tide, the solution is complicated. As
proposed, a lift station will be installed off of Dayton Street in the fishing pier parking lot as a first step to solve the flooding
problems at the intersection.
Lastly, Mr. English reviewed that in 2016 the Sewer Utility Fund (423) supported the replacement of 2,000 feet of sewer
main and the rehabilitation of 6,400 feet of sewer main using the cured -in -place process (CIPP). In addition, it funded 1,075
of pavement overlay on streets affected by the sewer main replacement projects. It is anticipated that 2,900 feet of sewer
main will be replaced in 2017, with 3,000 feet of CIPP rehabilitation and pavement overlay on 8,600 feet of street affected by
sewer main replacement. A large wastewater treatment project is in process near the ferry holding lanes where the secondary
clarifier is being replaced. The project should be completed in October.
Planning Board Minutes
September 28, 2016 Page 3
Packet Pg. 302
6.2.d
Chair Lovell asked if the Edmonds Waterfront Analysis relates to the work being done by the Railroad Crossing Task Force.
Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Chair Lovell asked why no funding has been set aside for this project in the next four
years. Mr. English said there is still momentum to move a crossing project forward, and the task force will continue its work.
The Mayor is currently working on the 2017 budget, which will be presented to the City Council in October. They will know
more about funding after the draft budget has been released. In addition, the City has applied for some transportation grants
to continue the work. At this point, it is too early to know if there will be funding for the project, and it was included in the
CFP as a placeholder.
Mr. English summarized that staff begins working on the CIP and CFP updates in July, and a preliminary draft is typically
presented to the Planning Board in September. A public hearing on the CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12' , after
which the Board will forward a recommendation to the City Council. Updated documents will be provided at the hearing,
including more detailed information to outline the differences between 2016 and 2017. Staff is scheduled to make an initial
presentation to the City Council on October 18th, with a public hearing on November I". Using the Board's input and public
comments, the City Council will discuss the draft documents and make revisions. It is anticipated that final adoption will
occur in November or December. Once adopted, the CFP will be included as part of the next batch of Comprehensive Plan
Amendments.
Board Member Monroe requested more information about the Citywide Capital Renewal Program, which is listed on Page 11
of the CIP. Ms. Hite said this program is managed by the Facilities Division. She explained that, in years past, the program
has had minimal funding, and many infrastructure renewal projects have been deferred. This year, Mayor Earling is
proposing that a lump sum be set aside for doing renewal of the City's capital assets. The Capital Facilities Manager has
prepared a list of needs, and the projects will be funded by the $1.5 million set aside for the Capital Renewal Program. The
intent is to chip away at the projects each year. For example, there are numerous needs at the Frances Anderson Center that
have been deferred from previous years.
Board Member Stewart said she is excited to see the projects that have been accomplished during the year, as well as projects
that will happen going forward. She asked if staff could provide the Board and City Council with a copy of the list of
projects associated with the Capital Renewal Project. Ms. Hite agreed to provide the list as an attachment for the public
hearing.
Board Member Stewart asked if City staff works to coordinate infrastructure projects so they can be done simultaneously.
For example, are sewer and water main replacements coordinated so they are completed before a street is overlaid. Mr.
English answered affirmatively. Once a significant project has been identified, City staff inspects the condition of other
elements, such as water and sewer mains. If needed, the pro�ects can be done simultaneously. For example, he referred to
the Dayton Street Project that took place between P and 9 Avenues, which was initiated as a stormwater improvement.
After doing a comprehensive review of the other utilities, the project was expanded to include water and sewer main
improvements, as well. The project at the 212th Street intersection is another example of a combined project. It initially
started as a transportation capacity project, but after evaluating the condition of the utilities, replacement of the sewer and
stormwater mains were incorporated into the project.
Board Member Stewart reviewed that frontage improvements, including sidewalks, are required for any new development in
the City. She voiced concern that, sometimes the improvements that are made are torn up just a few years later to
accommodate a City improvement project. She asked if it is possible for City staff to help developers anticipate the future
improvements and perhaps postpone or defer the frontage improvements until the City's larger project moves forward. Mr.
English said City staff has more control when it comes to coordinating City projects, but it is more difficult for private
development. A good example is the 200th Street Overlay Project. A developer found out about the project via the
notification process and the City worked with the developer to get the connections made to the City's systems before the
overlay project moved forward. He said staff tries to coordinate city projects and development proposals through the
building permit application. Ideally, the City can hold off on a project to allow a developer to get his/her work done, but he
acknowledged that is not always the case. Board Member Stewart summarized that the City should do its part to help
property owners by allowing them to postpone the improvements until they can be coordinated with larger, planned City
projects.
Planning Board Minutes
September 28, 2016 Page 4
Packet Pg. 303
6.2.d
Board Member Stewart asked if Planning Board Members would have an opportunity to provide feedback relative to the
fitness stations that are proposed for City parks. Ms. Hite answered that she would love to have feedback from the Board as
the project moves forward.
Board Member Stewart asked if funding for open space acquisition is included in the CIP. Ms. Hite answered that she
programs $200,000 into each year's budget for open space acquisition. She agreed it is important to include this in the yearly
discussions, and she will add it to her presentation for the public hearing. She said it would be helpful to have feedback from
the Board as to whether they support rolling this funding over from year-to-year until an opportunity comes up. Board
Member Stewart observed that, as land continues to be developed, the City should remain open to opportunities to acquire
open space. Once land is developed, the opportunity will be lost.
Board Member Cheung asked how the City prioritizes the capital improvement projects. Mr. English explained that, from a
pavement preservation standpoint, staff evaluates the condition of the pavement each year and places a rating on the streets.
They also try to coordinate the work with needed utility replacement projects. For example, a street overlay may be
postponed if the City knows that a water or sewer main project will be needed in the near future so that the two projects can
be coordinated and completed at the same time. As far as capital project prioritization, there is very limited funding, and the
City typically uses grant opportunities as a way to prioritize these projects. First, they look at the prioritized list of projects in
the 2015 Transportation Improvement Plan. As grant opportunities come up, staff selects the most competitive projects that
fit the particular grant requirements. Typically, the transportation capital infrastructure budget is very small (between
$140,000 and $150,000). Additional funding for capital projects comes from grants and from traffic impact fees. On the
other hand, Mayor Earling has made pavement preservation a priority for the past few years.
Board Member Cheung asked how citizens can recommend transportation improvement projects for inclusion in the
Transportation Improvement Plan. Mr. English explained that, from a planning standpoint, staff uses the list that is included
in the Transportation Improvement Plan, which an adopted element of the Comprehensive Plan. Adoption of the
Transportation Improvement Plan included an extensive public process that allowed the public to identify projects they felt
were most important. During the most recent update, a sidewalk committee was formed to evaluate each street and identify
where sidewalks are needed. Citizens can contact the Public Works or Engineering Department to provide feedback on
potential projects, and staff will evaluate the situation to determine what the appropriate solution might be. Vice Chair
Rubenkonig added that the Police Department also takes note of situations were a high number of accidents are occurring.
Board Member Crank said she appreciates the work that was done at the intersection of 228th Street and Highway 99.
However, some people are questioning the design of the median, which appears to have benches where people can sit. Mr.
English advised that the design was intended to provide relief to the median's appearance. There are a lot of design options
to choose from, but it was felt that the concrete or grass median was not very aesthetically pleasing for this location. Given
the speed of traffic along the corridor, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) also felt that the taller
median was needed for safety reasons. The center section of the median has a colored concrete stamp that was intended to
provide an aesthetic element to the median as opposed to a concrete covered center.
Board Member Crank referred to the new flashing traffic signal that was installed at Edmonds Way and 232nd Street. She
asked if the area is currently being monitored and if there has been an uptick in traffic volumes as a result of the new
marijuana business and proposed new residential development. Mr. English agreed to looking into the issue and provide a
better answer about traffic volumes at the public hearing. He recalled that the SR-104 Corridor Analysis that was recently
completed looked at the entire corridor through Edmonds. It identified several recommendations for capital improvement
projects to make the corridor more pedestrian friendly and safe.
Board Member Crank asked if there have been any reports of traffic accidents associated with the newly installed Luminous
Forest. Ms. Hite advised that the Police Department had some concerns when the it was first installed, and the artist advised
that after the installation has been on for one month, the surface will become scratched and dim. She hasn't heard of any
accidents on 4tb Avenue to date.
Board Member Crank said she would love to see the community garden concept come to fruition. It would be a very
attractive amenity for apartment dwellers. Ms. Hite agreed, but explained that the City has had a difficult time finding an
appropriate location. It was originally planned for the south side of the Old Woodway High School site, but because of
Planning Board Minutes
September 28, 2016 Page 5
Packet Pg. 304
6.2.d
controversy surrounding the athletic fields, staff decided against pursuing that location. She expressed her belief that the park
in Esperance would be good location for a community garden, and she will continue to work with Snohomish County to
make that happen.
Vice Chair Rubenkonig said she has had a long-standing concern about the intersection at 76th Avenue and 212th Street for a
number of years. The last time the CIP was before the Board, she requested that the City consider placing an "all walk"
crossing at this intersection. She lives in the area and is at the intersection often. It seems like an all walk would make it
faster for the students to get across the road. She asked if this could be included in the 2016 CIP. Mr. English said the
concept has been discussed by staff and it comes down to finding a balance between pedestrian safety and getting vehicles
through the intersection. He agreed to talk to the Transportation Engineer to get more information about the concept and then
report back to the Board at their next meeting.
Chair Lovell observed that this is the first time that neither the CIP nor CFP identifies funding for the Edmonds Crossing
Project. He assumes that staff will provide an explanation for this change and indicate whether the funds that were
previously allocated would be used elsewhere. Mr. English said there have been no changes associated with the Edmonds
Crossing Project. The project is currently identified as unknown based on WSDOT's current planning horizon for the multi -
modal terminal, which is beyond 2035 or even 2040. Although the project is still included on WSDOT's list of future
improvements, it remains unfunded, and the City does not know when funding will be allocated for it to move forward.
When the capital plan for the ferry is updated in the future, the City may have more information about the project's timing.
Chair Lovell commented that it is good to see that there are a lot of projects taking shape to meet the needs and cravings of
the citizens. Things are moving towards the betterment of the City's infrastructure overall. He asked if there has been any
interface between various City departments and the Tree Board, particularly in regard to street trees. The impact that some
species of street trees can have on sidewalk infrastructure is becoming a big concern, as repair and/or replacement is often
required. He noted that concern has also been raised about the types of trees that are planted at the Civic Center Field, which
could end up blocking views. Ms. Hite said managing trees requires a joint effort, and the Parks, Planning and Public Works
staff all work with the Tree Board, depending on the topic. Chair Lovell said he has heard that effort is being made to ensure
that new trees are selected to be the right species, size and growth pattern to protect the City's infrastructure.
Chair Lovell announced that a public hearing on the draft CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12th. He encouraged Board
Members to forward any outstanding questions directly to staff so they can be answered at the public hearing.
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Lovell reviewed the updated Extended Agenda, noting that a public hearing on the CIP and CFP is scheduled for
October 12th. Staff will also present an update on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments pertaining to parks, Highway 99,
street trees and water. On October 26th, the agenda will include a presentation on the University of Washington/Forterra Plan
that was prepared for Five Corners, a discussion on the land use procedures code update, and an update on the Highway 99
Subarea Plan.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Lovell did not provide any additional comments.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Board Member Crank reported that she and Vice Chair Rubenkonig attended the City's Volunteer Dinner.
Board Member Monroe reported on his attendance at the September 21st meeting of the Edmonds Citizens Economic
Development Commission where they put together a list of recommendations related to the Civic Field Master Plan. Most of
the recommendations were driven by economic development. For example, they want to see a playfield that can attract users
who will presumably shop in downtown Edmonds. The list was presented to the City Council on September 27th.
Planning Board Minutes
September 28, 2016 Page 6
Packet Pg. 305
be invited to provide feedback. An on-line open house will follow for two weeks to solicit additional public feedback. At
the close of the on-line open house, the hybrid design will be presented to the Planning Board for a public hearing and
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council will also conduct a public hearing before making a final decision on
the master plan design.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD
Chair Lovell referred the Board to the written report that was provided by the Development Services Director. He reported
that he and Vice Chair Rubenkonig met recently with Mayor Earling and received an update on the Sustainable Cities
Partnership, a collaboration between Western Washington University and the City of Edmonds. Mayor Earling advised that
there is currently a lot of activity and the students are moving forward with the projects identified as part of the program. He
spoke very positively about the experience thus far.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED 2017-2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
Chair Lovell reviewed the rules and procedures for the public hearing, which would start with a staff report by Mr. English
and Ms. Hite.
Mr. English started his presentation by providing a diagram to illustrate the components of the CIP and CFP, particularly
noting the differences between the two documents and where they overlap. The CFP is a planning document that includes
the 20-year projects and 6-year projects to address roads. The CIP identifies the short-term horizon projects that include both
capital and maintenance projects over the next six years. The overlap is where the six -year capital projects relate to growth;
these projects will be in both plans. The CFP is divided into three project sections: General (parks, buildings and regional
projects), Transportation (safety/capacity and pedestrian bicycle projects), and Utilities. The CIP is organized based on the
City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the six -year period. He
reviewed each of the funds as follows:
• Fund 112 — Transportation. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 116 — Building Maintenance. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 125 — Capital Projects. This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation and Public Works Departments.
Money for this fund comes from the Real Estate Excise Tax (BEET), and the dollars are split between the two
departments.
• Fund 126 — Special Capital/Park Acquisition. This fund is supported by REET funds and is managed by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
• Fund 129 — Special Projects. This fund is currently idle and was last used for the Highway 99 International District
Lighting Project that was completed a few years ago. Any new capital project would program into this fund.
• Fund 132 — Parks Construction (Grant Funding). This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department.
• Fund 421— Water Projects. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 422 — Storm Projects. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 423 — Waste Water Treatment Plant. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department.
Next, Mr. English recapped some of the larger projects that have been completed or the City is working towards completion
of in 2016:
• The 228 h Street Corridor Improvement Project started in May of 2015 and reached substantial completion in March of
2016. The project included a new signalized intersection that connects 228th Street east to west across Highway 99 and
into Mountlake Terrace, providing a new east/west connection to Interstate 5.
• The 228"' Street Sidewalk Improvement Project connects 100"b Street to 104`h Street with sidewalks on the north side.
This project was funded by a Safe Routes to Schools Grant.
Planning Board Minutes
October 12, 2016 Page 2
Packet Pg. 306
6.2.e
• The Pavement Restoration Program is a program that Mayor Earling has prioritized and funded for the fourth year in a
row using Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue from the 126 Fund.
• A walkway project will start soon on 236th Street, from SR-104 to Madrona School. This project will also be funded by
a Safe Routes to Schools Grant.
Mr. English reviewed some of the projects that will be funded in 2017:
• The 76"h Avenue West and 212th Street Intersection Improvement Project was bid out in May. However, given the
bidding climate, the bids came in much higher than the engineer's estimate. The City elected to reject the bids and rebid
the project during the winter months. That means the project would likely start in the spring of 2017. In the meantime,
the City has applied for additional grant funding from the Transportation Improvement Board, but won't know the
outcome of the application until November.
• Citywide bicycle improvements will continue in 2017. For example, a striping project will occur on 76th Avenue West in
conjunction with the intersection improvements described above. As proposed, the roadway would change from four to
three lanes, and a bicycle lane would be added.
• The 238th Street Walkway Project from SR-104 to SR-99 will also be completed in 2017. The City received a grant from
the State Transportation Improvement Board and design work has been started.
• The City received federal funding to move forward with an overlay of 841h Avenue from 2001h Street to 212th Street
during the summer of 2017.
• REET dollars will be used to install Trackside Warning Systems on Railroad Avenue at the Main and Dayton Street
intersections to reduce the sound footprint that the current train horns have. The warning systems will be permanently
installed at the intersections, and the horns will blow whenever a train is passing through Edmonds in either direction.
The noise from the horns will be more focused at the intersections so there will be less impact to surrounding properties.
Mr. English advised that, since the Board's last meeting, the Mayor approved his "decision package, which identifies projects
that staff identified for 2017. The package includes:
• Funding of $1.1 million for the Pavement Preservation Program, which is a critical piece of the City's ability to maintain
infrastructure.
• Funding for pre -design work for the access management on SR-99 between 216'h and 2241h Streets. The City has
observed a higher accident problem along this stretch of roadway related to the two-way left turn lane on SR-99. The
intent is to go forward with pre -design of the improvements in 2017.
• In coordination with Mountlake Terrace, the City has applied for a grant to coordinate the signals on 2201h Street, which
is badly needed. If the grant application is successful, the 2017 budget includes the matching funds to move the project
forward.
• $150,000 has been set aside to match grant dollars to continue to pursue alternatives for a waterfront at -grade crossing.
The committee will present the results of their study to the Mayor soon, and a presentation will be made to the City
Council in late October or early November.
• The proposed 2017 budget includes funding to replace 7,300 feet of water main and 2,900 feet of sewer main. It also
includes funding to rehabilitate 3,000 feet of sewer main.
Ms. Hite reviewed the 2016 projects that were completed by the Parks and Recreation Department in 2016 as follows:
Planning Board Minutes
October 12, 2016 Page 3
Packet Pg. 307
6.2.e
• The City acquired the Civic Field property and is currently in the process of completing a master plan for its
redevelopment. The consultant is working on a hybrid plan that will be unveiled at a public open house on October 19th
• The spray park at City Park was opened in the spring and had a very successful summer.
• The Dayton Street Plaza is nearly completed and it is already heavily used. They are currently in the last stages of
landscaping.
• The temporary art installation (Luminous Forest) on 4th Avenue was completed, and wayfinding signs were installed
throughout the City.
• The Marina Beach Park Master Plan was completed in early 2016, and the intent is to formally adopted the plan into the
City's Comprehensive Plan before the end of the year.
• The Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project is nearing completion, and it expected to open with a ribbon -cutting ceremony on
November 15"h.
• The Downtown Public Restroom Project is currently under construction near City Hall.
• The Yost Spa Project is currently in progress. However, the project had to be redesigned in order to meet current code
requirements.
• The Frances Anderson Center Stage Replacement Project is currently in progress.
• The design work for the Veteran's Project was completed. The City received two bids that were higher than the
engineer's estimate, and the project is being rebid.
• The playground equipment at Marina Beach Park has been replaced, and they are currently working to replace the
equipment at the Meadowdale Preschool playground.
Next, Ms. Hite reviewed the proposed 2017 projects as follows:
• The Edmonds Marsh and Daylighting of Willow Creek Project is ongoing. The City has obtained grant funding to
continue the feasibility study, and they have applied for other competitive grants, as well.
• Parklet Projects will move forward in 2017, as will the Outdoor Fitness Zone Project
• Gateway replacement is ongoing and in process.
• The City is partnering with the City of Lynnwood to rehabilitate the Meadowdale Playfields.
• The City's storage building burned down earlier in the year, and the City has received reimbursement from its insurance
company. Considering the storage needs of both the Facilities and Parks and Recreation Departments, staff is proposing
that the building be rebuilt to a size that is nearly 2.5 times larger but in the same location.
• There is funding left from the state grant that was used to acquire Civic Field, and the City has received permission from
the State to use the funds to demolish the grandstands.
• Funding was set aside in the 2016 CIP for a community garden, and staff is working with Snohomish County regarding
the possibility of partnering to create a community garden as Esperance Park.
• The bids received for the Veteran's Plaza were rejected, and the City will go out to bid again soon. They expect to break
ground in early 2017 and open the plaza in May of 2017.
Planning Board Minutes
October 12, 2016 Page 4
Packet Pg. 308
6.2.e
The Senior Center is undertaking a capital program to redevelop the site into a Waterfront Center, and the City has
discussed the opportunity to redevelop the waterfront at the same time. This will involve removing the existing creosote
pilings, reconfiguring the park, adding a bioswale and raingardens to filter runoff from the parking lot before it goes into
the Sound, adding a hand boat launch, providing more access to the beach, and adding a picnic area with a natural access
to the senior center. In addition, the City is currently in discussions with the owners of the Ebb Tide Condominiums to
complete the waterfront walkway in front of their building within the City's 10-foot easement. The City has applied for
two $50,000 grants, and the project has scored high on both. The City has also set aside park impact fee dollars for the
proj ect.
• Land acquisition is a high priority in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, and the proposed budget sets
aside an additional $200,000 for this purpose. The intent is to having matching funds for grants available when
opportunities to acquire land come about.
Ms. Hite said staff is recommending that the Cultural Arts Facilities Needs Study be deleted from the CFP. While the study
could still be done, it would be more of an operational project than a capital project. If a study determines that the City needs
a facility at some point in the future, it can be added to the CFP. Also, the Downtown Restroom Project should be completed
by the end of the year and can be removed from the 2017 CFP.
Ms. Hite advised that, since the last meeting, the CIP was updated to highlight "land acquisition" as a goal.
As requested by the Board at their last meeting, Mr. English provided a handout that lists the needs that were identified by the
Capital Facilities Manager for the 2017 Citywide Capital Renewal Program. He explained that, in past years, the budget for
capital facilities maintenance has been about $55,000. The Capital Facilities Manager requested that this amount be
increased up to $400,000 to quick start the program of investing in and maintaining the City's existing facilities. The projects
include roof repairs, painting, carpeting, seal coating, etc.
Mr. English recalled that the Board also asked him to provide more information about traffic volumes on SR-104. He
advised that the State does a number of traffic counts along the highway starting from the Ferry Terminal all the way to
Interstate 5. While the 2016 counts are not available, the 2015 counts can be compared to previous years. The counts
conclude that there was no increase in traffic volume from the ferry to 238th Street, but there was a small increase of 2% from
2401h Street to Interstate 5. At their last meeting, Board Member Crank asked how new development along SR-104 might
impact traffic volumes. He learned that the new development she referred to was actually permitted by Snohomish County so
the City does not have any transportation data. However, it is likely that the development had very little impact to the overall
traffic volumes on the highway.
Mr. English recalled that, at their last meeting, Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked about the possibility of adding an "all -walk"
phase at the intersection of 2121h Street and 76t1i Avenue to provide a safer pedestrian access for high school students. He
acknowledged that the concept has been used in select locations across the country, and it amounts to adding another phase to
the signal timing that closes the movement of traffic on all four lanes of the intersection to allow pedestrians to cross. He
explained that the City's current Level of Service (LOS) Standard for arterials is LOS D or better, and the proposed project
would improve the intersection to LOS D. If an all -walk phase were added, the standard at the intersection would change to
LOS E. He reminded the Board that the City secured a $3.96 million grant from the Congestion, Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) Fund, and the purpose of the grant was to improve air quality by reducing emissions and congestion. As currently
proposed, the intersection project would reduce emissions for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and oxides of
nitrogen. The benefit of the project is that reducing congestion will bring down emissions and that is why the City received
the funding. It would be difficult to change the project to add an all -walk phase because it would reduce the LOS standard
and increase emissions. Staff is proposing that the project be constructed as currently designed.
Mr. English summarized his presentation by reviewing that after the public hearing the Board will be asked to forward a
recommendation to the City Council. The CIP and CFP, along with the Board's recommendation, will be presented to the
City Council for a study session, followed by a public hearing on November I't
Planning Board Minutes
October 12, 2016 Page 5
Packet Pg. 309
6.2.e
Chair Lovell opened the public portion of the hearing. However, there was no one in the audience, and the public portion of
the hearing was subsequently closed.
Board Member Crank asked if the overlay project on 84th Avenue between 220th Street and 212th Street would take place
while school is in session. Mr. English said that, if all goes well, the intent is to do the work during the summer when school
is on break.
Board Member Crank said she is glad to hear that the City's goal is to do the Waterfront Redevelopment Project in tandem
with the Senior Center's Waterfront Center Project. She said she serves on the Senior Center Board, and the plan to talk
about fundraising and strategies at their upcoming retreat.
Board Member Crank referred to the funding set aside for land acquisition and asked if there are targeted properties the City
is looking to acquire. Ms. Hite answered that the PROS Plan identifies areas of the City that are not as well served by parks
and open space, and the City will look for opportunities to acquire additional land to serve these neighborhoods. In addition,
the City is always looking for opportunities to acquire properties along Shell Creek and other properties that run parallel to
the watersheds. However, the City must also consider the need to maintain the park space it already has. It requires a
balancing act.
Board Member Crank thanked Mr. English for providing data about traffic volumes on SR-104. She appreciates that data is
needed to make a case for improvements, and she looks forward to comparing 2016 data to previous years to determine the
impact of new development. She noted that, just tonight, the light stopped blinking because there was an emergency vehicle
coming through the intersection. People are accustomed to the light blinking, and a car was almost hit when it did not stop at
the light. She said she hopes new data will support the need for a study to see if mitigation is needed.
Board Member Cheung asked if the Traffic Engineer's analysis of an all -walk phase at the intersection of 212th Street and
76th Avenue considered that the phase would only need to be activated during certain times of the day (when students arrive,
when students leave, and when students go to lunch). Mr. English acknowledged that the phase could be timed to only
activate during certain times of the day, but the morning period when students are arriving at school is also during the peak
commute period. Board Member Cheung asked if LOS D could be maintained with an all -walk phase that only operate
during certain times of the day as described above. Mr. English said more traffic modeling would be needed to answer that
question.
Vice Chair Rubenkonig commented that adding an all -walk phase at the intersection of 76th Avenue and 212th Street would
minimize the pedestrians' exposure to pollution. Mr. English agreed that is possible, but it would depend on when the
pedestrian reaches the intersection. Depending on the phase of the light, a pedestrian may have to wait longer if an all -walk
phase were added. He also voiced concern that students may get impatient waiting for the signal and cross against traffic.
Chair Lovell asked if the Traffic Engineer has solicited feedback from the Edmonds School District relative to the proposed
changes at the intersection of 76th Avenue and 212th Street. Mr. English answered that the City has worked closely with the
school district to coordinate the phasing of the intersection improvements, and the school district has voiced support for the
proposed changes. The district has not requested an all -walk phase.
Ms. Clark said she uses the intersection at 76th Avenue and 212th Street often, and it could use some work. She often has to
wait about five minutes to cross the street, and she knows that some students become impatient and jay walk. Mr. English
explained that, currently, the intersection lacks turning movement, which means it takes longer for cars and pedestrians to get
through the sequence. With the proposed changes, the left turn lanes going north/south will go at the same time, which
allows the light to cycle faster. The same would be done for the east/west lanes.
Board Member Cheung asked if the intersection improvements would include left turns on a blinking light. Mr. English said
they have not made a firm decision on this option because it could lead to conflicts with the high school. A left -turn arrow
would hold up pedestrians. With a flashing yellow light for left turns, there is a potential that a student could be hit while
using a crosswalk if a driver sees a break in traffic and initiates the turn. Staff will continue to evaluate the option, but his
first thought is that it would not be appropriate in this location. Board Member Cheung asked if it would be possible to time
the lights so that the flashing turn is available only when school is not in session. Mr. English agreed that is a possibility.
Planning Board Minutes
October 12, 2016 Page 6
Packet Pg. 310
Chair Lovell thanked Ms. Hite and Mr. English for providing responses to the issues and concerns raised by the Board at
their last meeting. He asked that these responses also be conveyed to the City Council for consideration in their review of the
CIP and CFP.
Chair Lovell requested clarification on the funding that is currently available for the Veteran's Plaza. Ms. Hite answered that
the City will contribute $30,000 to the project, and the remaining portion of the $550,000 cost will come from fundraising.
Chair Lovell asked if the City is contemplating that work will start on the Waterfront Center and Waterfront Redevelopment
Projects in 2017. Ms. Hite said the goal is to do the projects in tandem. However, it is possible that the Senior Center will
not reach its funding goal in time to complete the project during the fish window, and the Waterfront Center Project will have
to be postponed until 2018. Based on grant funding, it may be necessary for the City to move forward with the Waterfront
Redevelopment Project in 2017. Again, she said the City's goal is to move the two projects forward in 2017, hoping that the
Senior Center will be ready, as well. Board Member Crank advised that the Senior Center's target is to break ground on the
project in September of 2017. Ms. Hite emphasized that there is a fish window that limits when waterfront development can
occur, and it happens to be during the summer months. Ms. Crank said the Senior Center Board's goal is to meet that
window.
Board Member Robles asked for clarification of the small boat launch that is proposed as part of the waterfront
redevelopment project. Ms. Hite said this would be a hand launch facility that is not meant for large boats. She referred to
the proposed design of the project and noted the location of the boat launch. She explained that the ramp would serve a dual
purpose for launching small watercraft (kayaks, paddleboards, etc.) and providing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
access.
Board Member Stewart referred to Page 150 of the Staff Report that describes the Edmonds Marsh Feasibility and
Restoration/Walkway Project, which is estimated to cost $155,000. She asked if the project would include a new walkway
around the marsh. Ms. Hite said the project includes restoration of the current walkway, which is queued up for 2017.
However, the work done by the Western Washington University Students as part of the Sustainable Cities Project will
include consideration of a boardwalk all the way around the marsh. Several community citizens have volunteered to
participate on a focus group to discuss the concept further.
Board Member Stewart asked if the walkway that is proposed in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums would be ADA
accessible. Ms. Hite answered that there would be two sections of stairs to provide broader accessibility, but the boardwalk
would all be accessible. The boardwalk proposed in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums would connect the north and south
portions of the existing boardwalk together.
Board Member Stewart noted that there are redundancies in the CIP, as some projects appear to be listed twice, and the dollar
amounts do not match up. Ms. Hite said the redundancy has to do with the different funds that are used for the projects. In
many cases, funding will come from a variety of sources and/or funds.
Board Member Stewart said she is glad that the documents identify certain properties the City is keeping an eye on for park
acquisition. There is forest land in the northern portion of the City that has been on and off the market for quite some time
and is part of the Perrinville Creek Drainage Basin. There is a real desire in the neighborhood for the City to acquire this
property, and it can only happen if funding is available. She suggested that the City allocate a significantly larger amount in
2017 to allow the City to competitively bid for the property. Ms. Hite commented that this would be difficult. She explained
that Mayor Earling weighs out all of the priorities for the City and attempts to balance all needs when allocating the REET
dollars in the 126 Fund. For example, the 126 Fund is also used to support the Street Preservation and Facilities Restoration
Programs, which both have a backlog of projects. In addition to acquiring more park and open space, it is also important for
the City to adequately maintain their existing properties. However, she agreed to make note of Board Member Stewart's
request when presenting the CIP and CFP to the City Council. Board Member Stewart commented that the City could
establish a donor program to provide funding support for future park and open space acquisition. Ms. Hite agreed and said
that she has been working with Council Member Mesaros to pursue this option further. Board Member Stewart agreed to
assist in the effort.
Planning Board Minutes
October 12, 2016 Page 7
Packet Pg. 311
6.2.e
Vice Chair Rubenkonig requested clarification relative to the schedule for the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project, which is
described on Page 58 of the Staff Report. Mr. English reviewed that staff provided a report to the City Council in August
relative to the concept of building a walkway on the west side of Sunset Avenue. Currently, there is temporary striping that
designates a walkway area, but there has been quite a lot of discussion about where the parking should be located, what kind
of parking should be provided, etc. Parallel with the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project is a utility improvement project. The
City is considering options for improving the lift station on Sunset Avenue south of Caspers Street to install a new gravity
line to take sewage to the treatment plant rather than having to pump it. A waterline also needs to be replaced. No
permanent walkway or designated parking would be constructed until after the utility work has been completed in 2017. He
agreed to clarify the schedule in the project description.
Vice Chair Rubenkonig observed that the proposed sidewalk project on 232nd Street SW from 100th Avenue W to SR-104
(Page 60 of the Staff Report) would provide the fastest walking route to Westgate from the intersection with SR-104, and the
City should encourage people to use it as such. She also suggested that the CIP and CFP should include a listing of the
sources recommending action to help citizens know how long a project has been in the making, and the embedded vicinity
maps may be easier to navigate if compass points were included. While providing footage of the sidewalk projects has
begun, it could be completed, and highlighting project areas could assist the reader in identifying the size and location of the
proposed work.
Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked for clarification about the Pine Ridge Forest Management Study, which is described on
Page 105 of the Staff Report. In particular, she asked if the City has done similar studies for other parks in the past. Ms. Hite
explained that the Public Works, Planning and Parks Departments are coordinating an effort to complete an Urban Forestry
Management Plan for the entire City in 2016 and 2017, but there are a lot of older trees in Pine Ridge Park that warrant an
evaluation to assess the City's liability, etc.
Chair Rubenkonig pointed out that the acronym WWTP (Page 117 of the Staff Report) should be spelled out as the Waste
Water Treatment Plant. She also referred to the Table that lists the publicly -owned facilities in Edmonds and other nearby
areas and suggested that the Civic Center Playfield should be removed from the list of school district properties and added to
the list of City -owned properties.
VICE CHAIR RUBENKONIG MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM (CIP) AND CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) FOR 2016 THROUGH 2O22 TO THE CITY
COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL BASED ON THE COMMENTS PROVIDED BY THE
BOARD. BOARD MEMBER STEWART SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
THE BOARD RECESSED THE MEETING FOR A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK AT 8:20 P.M. THE MEETING
RECONVENED AT 8:27 P.M.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Mr. Chave reviewed that the most recent Comprehensive Plan update was completed in 2015, and included a major review as
required by the Growth Management Act. Typically, the City undertakes relatively minor amendments in intervening years.
This year's amendments will include the following:
Amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated CFP.
Amending the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan to include the adopted Marina Beach Master Plan as
a new "Appendix D." Appendix A would also be amended to acknowledge and reflect the Marina Beach Master
Plan.
Amending the Capital Facilities Element to add an implementation action that would read, "Develop level of service
standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 and consider including the standards in the Comprehensive
Plan."
In addition to the amendments listed above, Mr. Chave advised that two more substantial amendments are currently being
developed: The Water Comprehensive Plan and the Street Tree Plan. Drafts of each of the plans are due before the end of
Planning Board Minutes
October 12, 2016 Page 8
Packet Pg. 312
6.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2016
Discussion regarding the 2017 Proposed City Budget (60 min.)
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
Mayor presented his recommended 2017 Budget to Council on October 11, 2016.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
During tonight's Council Meeting, staff will provide Council presentations of their 2017 budget requests.
Tentative Department Budget Presentations are scheduled as follows:
October 18th:
Public Works Utilities, Street, Public Works Administration, Facilities Maintenance, Equipment Rental
and Engineering.
October 25th:
1. Economic Development; 2. Development Services; 3. Parks; 4. Human Resources; 4. City Attorney and
5. Municipal Court.
November 1st:
1. Police Dept.; 2. City Clerk; 3. Mayor's Office, Council; 4. Finance & Information Services and 5. Non -
departmental.
November 7th:
Revenue Sources and Public Comment.
November 15th:
Public Hearing and Potential Adoption of the 2017 Budget and Public Comment.
November 22nd:
Public Hearing and Potential Adoption of the 2017 Budget (if necessary)
December 6th:
2017 Budget Review Adoption of the 2017 Budget (if necessary)
Packet Pg. 313